Cities Index.
Agenda, closed session

Adelanto City Council
May 25, 2022

Document
Agenda, closed session
Meeting
May 25, 2022
Body
Adelanto City Council
Pages
20
Original file
49.9 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on adelanto.granicus.com. That file is the official record.

Date
Effluent WEEKLY Influent
448
Sulfate Sulfide Total Phenols Total
Phenols
Tot Petr
Hydrocarbons
VOC's SVOC's
Inorganic
Constituent
s
Boron Flouride Chloride Sodium
mg/l mg/l mg/l as C6H5OH mg/L mg/L ug/l ug/l ug/l mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/l 4/1/2022
4/2/2022
4/3/2022
4/4/2022
4/5/2022
4/6/2022 110 ND ND 0.38 0.7 100.0 110
4/7/2022
4/8/2022
4/9/2022
4/10/2022
4/11/2022
4/12/2022
4/13/2022
4/14/2022
4/15/2022
4/16/2022
4/17/2022
4/18/2022
4/19/2022
4/20/2022
4/21/2022
4/22/2022
4/23/2022
4/24/2022
4/25/2022
4/26/2022
4/27/2022
4/28/2022
4/29/2022
4/30/2022
Total
Average 110 0.10 0.020 0.38 0.70 100 110
Maximum 110 0.10 0.020 0.38 0.70 100 110
Minimum 110 0.10 0.020 0.38 0.70 100 110
RDL 0.1 0.02 See attached laboratory results

ADELANTO WWTP SUMMARY REPORT

Page 3 ends

Date
Eff. semi-annual Apr & Oct Annually in October Effluent semi annual April & October 449
Section C
Collection System Report
450

PROJECT STATUS REPORT & PROJECTIONS
Project Name: City of Adelanto
Department: Collection System
Month: April 2022
Prepared By: PERC Water Corporation

PROJECT STATUS REPORT
Date Footage Mo/Yr Area Locations That Need Attention
April 2022 0/0 • No Annual
cleaning
• Monthly enhanced maintenance
areas
• Quarterly enhanced maintenance
areas
TABLE OF CONTENTS:
01) Adelanto Enhanced Maintenance 04-22
02) Adelanto Enhanced Maintenance Annual Log 2022
LIST OF NOTES:
01) On 4-13-22 PERC staff responded to a possible sewer spill located at Lee and Larkspur. Upon arrival PERC staff did not see any water on the ground, and started to open manholes in the area in search of a backup. All manholes in the area we found to be free flowing with no restrictions. After more research it was determined that the residents in the area were concerned that the plugged storm drains on the north side of Lee would not allow rain water to flow off of the street. 02) On 4-19-22 PERC staff cleaned the lift station wet well with the Vactor 03) On 4-20-22 PERC staff responded to a possible sewer spill located at 10357 Kaytlyn. Upon arrival PERC staff did not see any water on the ground, and started to open manholes in the area in search of a backup. After more research it was determined that the resident was concerned that the plugged storm drains in the area would not allow rain water to flow off of the street. 04) On 4-20-22 PERC staff responded to a possible sewer back up located at 10488 Zinfandel. Upon arrival there was no sewer on the ground, and the manholes in the area were free flowing. After more questions with the resident it was determined that they needed to have a plumber come out to the house and clean their lateral.
451
City of Adelanto Enhanced Maintenance Collection System Operator: Shawn Month: April 2022 Date Location Street & Cross Street Feet
Cleaned
Comments
1 4/18/2022 Pearmain & Taylor 275 Cleaned south, greasy 2 4/18/2022 Pearmain & Taylor 285 Cleaned west
3 4/18/2022 Pearmain & Cactus 400 Cleaned south
4 4/18/2022 Cactus & Caliente 700 Cleaned west
5 4/18/2022 Joshua & Verbena 200 Cleaned west
6 4/18/2022 Verbena & Mojave 500 Cleaned west
7 4/18/2022 Verbena & Mojave 500 Cleaned south
8 4/18/2022 Vintage 500 Cleaned west very dirty low flow 9 4/18/2022 Vintage & Aster 500 Cleaned west very dirty low flow 10 4/18/2022 1st Mh N Muskrat & Forest 500 Cleaned north 11 4/18/2022 1st Mh N Muskrat & Forest 500 Cleaned south 12 4/25/2022 Bellflower & Auburn 460 Cleaned north, greasy & heavy grease build up in MH 13 4/25/2022 Bellflower & Auburn 500 Cleaned west, greasy & heavy grease build up in MH 14 4/25/2022 1st Mh W Auburn and 395 400 Cleaned west, greasy & heavy grease build up in MH 15 4/25/2022 1st Mh E Auburn and 395 500 Cleaned west
16 4/25/2022 Bartlett & Lilac 700 Cleaned west
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
^
Total Feet 7,420
452
MONTHLY Map pg. JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Bellflower & Auburn 460 N 500 W 10-Feb 23-Feb 25-Apr
1st Mh W 395 & Auburn 400 W 10-Feb 23-Feb 25-Apr
1st Mh E 395 & Auburn 500 W 10-Feb 23-Feb 25-Apr
Pearmain & Taylor 275 S & 285 W 8 10-Feb 23-Feb 18-Apr
Pearmain & Cactus 300 E & 400 S 10 10-Feb 23-Feb 18-Apr 1st Mh W Aster & Vintage 500 W 41 10-Feb 23-Feb 18-Apr
Aster & Vintage 500 W 41 10-Feb 23-Feb 18-Apr

BI-MONTHLY JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV

QUARTERLY JAN APR JUL OCT
Verbena & Mojave W 500 W & S 23 10-Feb 18-Apr
1st mh N Forest & Muskrat 500 N&S 10-Feb 18-Apr
Joshua & Verbena 200 W 17 10-Feb 18-Apr
Cactus & Caliente 400 W 8.9 10-Feb 18-Apr
Bartlett & Lilac 10-Feb 18-Apr

BI-ANNUAL JAN JUL
Geo East
453
Section D
Bio-Solids Report
454
April 2022 Section D – Bio-solids Report
Adelanto Wastewater Treatment System
Bio-solids Report
In April 2022, PERC Water Staff performed dewatering procedures to dewater 1,972,045 gallons of bio-solids from the aerated solids holding tank. See data table below for amounts and disposal costs. Wet tons of bio-solids were removed at an average total solids concentration of 22%. End dump trailers were collected periodically by GIC Corporation and delivered to Synagro composting facility in Helendale, CA.

Wet Tons Dry Tons Wet Tons Dry Tons
January 351.66 63.30 13 13 $5,608.98 $9,962.53 $15,571.50 $44.28 February 297.52 53.55 11 11 $4,745.44 $8,428.74 $13,174.19 $44.28 March 256.83 46.23 906.01 163.08 10 10 $4,096.44 $7,275.99 $11,372.43 $44.28 April 326.76 71.89 13 13 $5,211.82 $9,257.11 $14,468.93 $44.28 May 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 #DIV/0!
June 0.00 326.76 71.89 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 #DIV/0!
July 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 #DIV/0!
August 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 #DIV/0!
September 0.00 0.00 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 #DIV/0!
October 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 #DIV/0!
November 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 #DIV/0!
December 0.00 0.00 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 #DIV/0!
Total Tons 1232.77 234.97 1232.77 234.97 47 47 $19,662.68 $34,924.37 $54,587.06 #DIV/0! Metric Tons 1118.12 213.12 1118.12 213.12 total total total total total average 2022 BIO-SOLIDS HAULED
Adelanto production Quarter # of GIC
end dump
Removed
# Synagro
loads
received
Total Hauling
Cost
Total
Tipping Fee
Cost
Total Cost Total Cost Per
Ton
455
April 2022 Section D – Bio-solids Report
Adelanto Wastewater Treatment System
Burrtec hauls off screenings/rags and recycle product from the facility each month. See data table below for bins removed from the Facility.

RECYCLE
# of Bins ft3
yards # of Bins
January 20 40 2
February 20 40 2
March 23 46 2
April 22 44 2
May 0
June 0
July 0
August 0
September 0
October 0
November 0
December 0
Total 85 170 8
2022 SCREENINGS/GRIT HAULED
456
Section E
Preventive Maintenance
CMMS Report
457
April 2022 Section E Completed Work Orders
Adelanto Wastewater Treatment System
Completed Work Orders
Below is a list of the Adelanto’s Wastewater System’s completed work orders for the month of April: 136 tasks completed
Completed
Date
Asset ID Asset Description Brief Description
4/1/2022 LIFTSTATION Pump station lift station float alarm 4/1/2022 ADELPNFLTS FILTERS Clean VFD Panel Filters
4/4/2022 AD_SH_ANDRITZ Andritz Centrifuge Run Andritz centrifuge 4/4/2022 ADPOLYUNIT Polymer unit Clean polymer flow sensor 4/4/2022 AD_SH_CENTRISYS Centrisys Centrifuge Lubricate Housing Seal Assembly 4/4/2022 AD_SH_CENTRISYS Centrisys Centrifuge Lubricate Solids and Liquid end Headwall External Assembly
4/11/2022 AD_SH_ANDRITZ Andritz Centrifuge Run Andritz centrifuge 4/11/2022 ADPOLYUNIT Polymer unit Clean polymer flow sensor 4/11/2022 AD_SH_CENTRISYS Centrisys Centrifuge Lubricate Housing Seal Assembly 4/11/2022 AD_SH_CENTRISYS Centrisys Centrifuge Lubricate Solids and Liquid end Headwall External Assembly
4/12/2022 ADSCCLW Sludge Thickener
West
Scum Pit
4/12/2022 ADSCCLE Sludge Thickener
East
Scum Pit
4/14/2022 ADINFEFFSMPLRS Influent and Effluent
sampler
Semi-annual samples due next
week
4/14/2022 ADINFEFFSMPLRS Influent and Effluent
sampler
Clean Influent Effluent Sampler
4/14/2022 AD_SC-CLRFYR-N North Clarifier Weekly Clarifier check 4/14/2022 AD_SC-CLRFYR-S South Clarifier Weekly Clarifier check 4/14/2022 AD_AZ_BLWR1 Aerzen Blower 1 Change and wash pre-filters 4/14/2022 AD_AZ_BLWR2 Aerzen Blower 2 Change and wash pre-filters 4/14/2022 AD_AZ_BLWR3 Aerzen Blower 3 Change and wash pre-filters 4/14/2022 ADSCCLW Sludge Thickener
West
Sludge thickener check
4/14/2022 ADSCCLE Sludge Thickener
East
Sludge thickener check
4/14/2022 AD_SCADA SCADA system Scada Test
4/14/2022 ADEYEWSHST eye wash eye wash/shower weekly check 4/14/2022 AD_DOPROBES D O probes on North
and South Basins
Clean D.O. Probes on North and
South Basin
458
April 2022 Section E Completed Work Orders
Adelanto Wastewater Treatment System
4/14/2022 AD_RCYCLPMP1 Recycle pump 1 for
new plant water
system
Bump motor for Recycle pump
4/14/2022 AD_RCYCLPMP2 Recycle pump 2 for
new plant water
system
Bump motor for Recycle pump
4/14/2022 AD_RAS_PMPS RAS pumps Swap RAS pumps
4/14/2022 AD_RPTS Reports Collections, IPP, Emaint
4/14/2022 ADPLGPD1 Pipe Plug (pig) Check plug
4/14/2022 AD_SC-CLRFYR-N North Clarifier Weekly Clarifier check 4/14/2022 AD_SC-CLRFYR-S South Clarifier Weekly Clarifier check 4/14/2022 ADSCCLW Sludge Thickener
West
Sludge thickener check
4/14/2022 ADSCCLE Sludge Thickener
East
Sludge thickener check
4/14/2022 AD_SCADA SCADA system Scada Test
4/14/2022 AD_BLWR_BLD BUILDINGS Replacement of Blower Building Filters
4/14/2022 AD_HW-GC-CPT1 Grit Collector CPT 1 Monthly cpt inspection 4/14/2022 AD_HW-GC-CPT2 Grit Collector CPT 2 Monthly cpt inspection 4/14/2022 AD_DOPROBES D O probes on North
and South Basins
Clean D.O. Probes on North and
South Basin
4/14/2022 AD_RCYCLPMP1 Recycle pump 1 for
new plant water
system
Bump motor for Recycle pump
4/14/2022 AD_RCYCLPMP2 Recycle pump 2 for
new plant water
system
Bump motor for Recycle pump
4/14/2022 AD_HW-GP-P1 Grit Pump 1 grit pump belt check
4/14/2022 AD_HW-GP-P2 Grit Pump 2 grit pump belt check
4/14/2022 AD_HW-FR-E Flex Rake East Flexrake check
4/14/2022 ADPLGPD1 Pipe Plug (pig) Check plug
4/14/2022 AD_SC-CLRFYR-N North Clarifier Weekly Clarifier check 4/14/2022 AD_SC-CLRFYR-S South Clarifier Weekly Clarifier check 4/14/2022 AD_AZ_BLWR1 Aerzen Blower 1 Change and wash pre-filters 4/14/2022 AD_AZ_BLWR2 Aerzen Blower 2 Change and wash pre-filters 4/14/2022 AD_AZ_BLWR3 Aerzen Blower 3 Change and wash pre-filters 4/14/2022 ADSCCLW Sludge Thickener
West
Sludge thickener check
4/14/2022 ADSCCLE Sludge Thickener
East
Sludge thickener check
4/14/2022 AD_SCADA SCADA system Scada Test
4/15/2022 AD_HW-GP-M1 Grit Pump 1 Motor Lubrication Grease 459
April 2022 Section E Completed Work Orders
Adelanto Wastewater Treatment System
4/15/2022 AD_HW-GP-M2 Grit Pump 2 Motor Lubrication Grease 4/15/2022 AD_SH-POL-M Polymer Motor polymer pump gear box oil check 4/17/2022 AD_HAZ-WST Haz waste check
sheet
Check and fill out weekly check
sheet
4/17/2022 AD_RCYCLPMP1 Recycle pump 1 for
new plant water
system
Bump motor for Recycle pump
4/17/2022 AD_RCYCLPMP2 Recycle pump 2 for
new plant water
system
Bump motor for Recycle pump
4/17/2022 AD_HAZ-WST Haz waste check
sheet
Check AGST binder and make
sure it is up to date
4/17/2022 AD_TRAC Tractor Check oil in tractor
4/18/2022 AD_HAZ-WST Haz waste check
sheet
Check AGST binder and make
sure it is up to date
4/18/2022 AD_PONDS Percolation Ponds Rotate ponds
4/18/2022 AD_SH-CENTRISYS-MM Centrisys Muffin
Monster
Centrisys Muffin Monster
lubrication grease
4/18/2022 ADPHECMD Probe Calibrate pH and EC probes
4/18/2022 BELLFLOWER_AUBURN Collection Systems Bellflower and Auburn 4/18/2022 HOTLIST Collection Systems Pearmain and Taylor 4/18/2022 HOTLIST Collection Systems Pearmain and Cactus 4/18/2022 HOTLIST Collection Systems Aster and Vintage
4/18/2022 HOTLIST Collection Systems Verbena & Mojave
4/18/2022 HOTLIST Collection Systems Forest and Muskrat 4/18/2022 HOTLIST Collection Systems Joshua & Verbena
4/18/2022 AD_HAZ-WST Haz waste check
sheet
Check and fill out weekly check
sheet
4/18/2022 AD-FAK First aid kits Monthly first aid kits check 4/18/2022 BELLFLOWER_AUBURN Collection Systems Manhole inspection 4/18/2022 AD_HAZ-WST Haz waste check
sheet
Check AGST binder and make
sure it is up to date
4/18/2022 AD_SH_ANDRITZ Andritz Centrifuge Lubricate support bearing and motors
4/18/2022 AD_DOPROBES D O probes on North
and South Basins
Clean D.O. Probes on North and
South Basin
4/18/2022 AD_SH_ANDRITZ Andritz Centrifuge Run Andritz centrifuge 4/19/2022 LIFTSTATION Pump station Wet well grease cleaning 4/19/2022 LIFTSTATION Pump station air release debris removal 4/19/2022 LIFTSTATION Pump station lift station float alarm 4/19/2022 AD_GD Multi gas detector Multi Gas Detector Calibration 4/19/2022 FIREEXTR Fire Extinguisher fire extinguisher inspection 4/19/2022 LIFTSTATION Pump station lift station float alarm 460
April 2022 Section E Completed Work Orders
Adelanto Wastewater Treatment System
4/19/2022 ADPLGPD1 Pipe Plug (pig) Check plug
4/19/2022 ADPOLYUNIT Polymer unit Clean polymer flow sensor 4/19/2022 AD_SC-CLRFYR-N North Clarifier Weekly Clarifier check 4/19/2022 AD_SC-CLRFYR-S South Clarifier Weekly Clarifier check 4/19/2022 AD_SH_CENTRISYS Centrisys Centrifuge Lubricate Housing Seal Assembly 4/19/2022 AD_SH_CENTRISYS Centrisys Centrifuge Lubricate Solids and Liquid end Headwall External Assembly
4/20/2022 AD_BIOSOLIDS Biosolids Bio solids sampling
4/20/2022 AD-PORT-GEN Generators RUN PORTABLE GENERATOR FOR 15 MINUTES
4/20/2022 AD_HW-GP-P1 Grit Pump 1 grit pump check
4/20/2022 AD_HW-GP-P2 Grit Pump 2 grit pump check
4/20/2022 ADSCCLW Sludge Thickener
West
Sludge thickener check
4/20/2022 ADSCCLE Sludge Thickener
East
Sludge thickener check
4/20/2022 AD_SC-RAS-P1 Sludge Thickener RAS
Pump 1
Sludge Thickener R.A.S. pump
inspection
4/20/2022 AD_SC-RAS-P2 Sludge Thickener RAS
Pump 2
Sludge Thickener R.A.S. pump
inspection
4/21/2022 AD_HAZ-WST Haz waste check
sheet
Check and fill out weekly check
sheet
4/22/2022 AD_DOPROBES D O probes on North
and South Basins
Clean D.O. Probes on North and
South Basin
4/22/2022 AD_RCYCLPMP1 Recycle pump 1 for
new plant water
system
Bump motor for Recycle pump
4/22/2022 AD_RCYCLPMP2 Recycle pump 2 for
new plant water
system
Bump motor for Recycle pump
4/22/2022 AD_HAZ-WST Haz waste check
sheet
Check AGST binder and make
sure it is up to date
4/23/2022 AD_SCADA SCADA system Scada Test
4/23/2022 AD_AZ_BLWR1 Aerzen Blower 1 Aerzen Blower filter inspection 4/23/2022 AD_AZ_BLWR2 Aerzen Blower 2 Aerzen Blower filter inspection 4/23/2022 AD_AZ_BLWR3 Aerzen Blower 3 Aerzen Blower filter inspection 4/25/2022 AD_8INPORTPMP 8 Inch portable pump Run 8 in portable pump 4/25/2022 BELLFLOWER_AUBURN Collection Systems Manhole inspection 4/25/2022 AD_SC-PT Scum pit Clarifier scum pit
4/25/2022 AD_SC-PW-P_NORTH Plant Water Pump
North
plant water pump check
4/25/2022 AD_SC-PW-P_NORTH Plant Water Pump
North
plant water pump belt check
461
April 2022 Section E Completed Work Orders
Adelanto Wastewater Treatment System
4/25/2022 AD_SC-PW-P_SOUTH Plant Water Pump
South
plant water pump check
4/25/2022 AD_SC-PW-P_SOUTH Plant Water Pump
South
plant water pump belt check
4/25/2022 AD_SH_ANDRITZ Andritz Centrifuge Run Andritz centrifuge 4/26/2022 ADPLGPD1 Pipe Plug (pig) Check plug
4/26/2022 ADPOLYUNIT Polymer unit Clean polymer flow sensor 4/26/2022 ADSCCLE Sludge Thickener
East
Scum Pit
4/26/2022 AD_SC-CLRFYR-S South Clarifier Weekly Clarifier check 4/26/2022 AD_AZ_BLWR1 Aerzen Blower 1 Change and wash pre-filters 4/26/2022 AD_AZ_BLWR2 Aerzen Blower 2 Change and wash pre-filters 4/26/2022 AD_AZ_BLWR3 Aerzen Blower 3 Change and wash pre-filters 4/26/2022 AD_SH_CENTRISYS Centrisys Centrifuge Lubricate Housing Seal Assembly 4/26/2022 AD_SH_CENTRISYS Centrisys Centrifuge Lubricate Solids and Liquid end Headwall External Assembly
4/27/2022 ADSCCLW Sludge Thickener
West
Sludge thickener check
4/27/2022 ADSCCLW Sludge Thickener
West
sludge thickener drive chain
check
4/27/2022 ADSCCLE Sludge Thickener
East
Sludge thickener check
4/27/2022 ADSCCLE Sludge Thickener
East
sludge thickener drive chain
check
4/27/2022 AD_SCADA SCADA system Scada Test
4/28/2022 ADELPNFLTS FILTERS Clean VFD Panel Filters
4/28/2022 ADINFEFFSMPLRS Influent and Effluent
sampler
Clean Influent Effluent Sampler
4/28/2022 AD_SIPS-ST SIPS Station sips station motor check 4/28/2022 AD_HAZ-WST Haz waste check
sheet
Check and fill out weekly check
sheet
4/29/2022 AD_DOPROBES D O probes on North
and South Basins
Clean D.O. Probes on North and
South Basin
4/29/2022 AD_RCYCLPMP2 Recycle pump 2 for
new plant water
system
Bump motor for Recycle pump
4/29/2022 AD_HAZ-WST Haz waste check
sheet
Check AGST binder and make
sure it is up to date
462
Section F
SSMP/IPP Report
463
April 2022 Section F – IPP / SSMP Report
Adelanto Wastewater Treatment System

INDUSTRIAL PRETREATMENT PROGRAM (IPP) & SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT

PLAN (SSMP)
Staff is reviewing all users and scheduling inspections for May 2022. Listed are April’s 2022 activities:
· No inspections done due to COVID-19 and social distancing. · Receiving flow and pH data from MK Magnetics periodically with their discharge to city sewer.
· Received and reviewed LADWP second water reduction demand letter. · On 4-6-2022 inspected LADWP. Found percolation ponds not in use. Appears to have lower flows from previous inspections.
464
Section G
Laboratory Results
465
Client Name:

Report Date:

PERC Water Corp
19101 Jonathan St.

Dave Kachelski
Adelanto, CA 92301
Contact:

Address: Project Number:

Analytical Report: Page 1 of 12
Project Name:
29-Apr-2022
Work Order Number: C2D0650
Received on Ice (Y/N): Yes Temp: °C 5
PERC - Quarterly Effluent M/J/S/D
Adelanto WWTP
C2D0650
Attached is the analytical report for the sample(s) received for your project. Below is a list of the individual sample descriptions with the corresponding laboratory number(s). Also, enclosed is a copy of the Chain of Custody document (if received with your sample(s)). Please note any unused portion of the sample(s) may be responsibly discarded after 30 days from the above report date, unless you have requested otherwise.

Thank you for the opportunity to serve your analytical needs. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this report please contact our client service department.

Sample Identification
Lab Sample # Client Sample ID Matrix Date Sampled By Date Submitted By C2D0650-01 Liquid 04/6/22 5:30 Tristan Hause Courier (Lisa Penunuri) - DE
Influent ---ROUTINE--- 04/06/22 14:45
C2D0650-02 Liquid 04/6/22 5:20 Tristan Hause Courier (Lisa Penunuri) - DE
Effluent ---ROUTINE--- 04/06/22 14:45
mailing
P.O. Box 432
Riverside, CA 92502-0432
CA ELAP No. 2698
EPA No. CA00102
NELAP No. OR4035
LACSD No. 10119
P (951) 653-3351
F (951) 653-1662
www.babcocklabs.com
location
6100 Quail Valley Court
Riverside, CA 92507-0704
466
Client Name:

Report Date:

PERC Water Corp
19101 Jonathan St.

Dave Kachelski
Adelanto, CA 92301
Contact:

Address: Project Number:

Analytical Report: Page 2 of 12
Project Name:
29-Apr-2022
Work Order Number: C2D0650
Received on Ice (Y/N): Yes Temp: °C 5
PERC - Quarterly Effluent M/J/S/D
Adelanto WWTP
C2D0650
Laboratory Reference Number
Sample Description
04/06/22 05:30
Sampled Date/Time Received Date/Time
04/06/22 14:45
Matrix
Influent Liquid
C2D0650-01
Analyte(s) Result RDL MDL Units Method Analysis Date Analyst Flag Solids
Total Dissolved Solids 590 10 10 mg/L SM 2540C 04/12/22 19:55 AXM Total Suspended Solids 200 10 10 mg/L SM 2540D 04/13/22 23:55 RRC Aggregate Organic Compounds
Biochemical Oxygen Demand 260 50 50 mg/L SM 5210B 04/07/22 00:58 DFL Nutrients
Ammonia-Nitrogen 37 5.1 mg/L SM4500NH3H
G

0.5 04/08/22 10:53 YVD
Kjeldahl Nitrogen 46 4.0 3.7 mg/L EPA 351.2 04/22/22 19:38 TRS mailing
P.O. Box 432
Riverside, CA 92502-0432
CA ELAP No. 2698
EPA No. CA00102
NELAP No. OR4035
LACSD No. 10119
P (951) 653-3351
F (951) 653-1662
www.babcocklabs.com
location
6100 Quail Valley Court
Riverside, CA 92507-0704
467
Client Name:

Report Date:

PERC Water Corp
19101 Jonathan St.

Dave Kachelski
Adelanto, CA 92301
Contact:

Address: Project Number:

Analytical Report: Page 3 of 12
Project Name:
29-Apr-2022
Work Order Number: C2D0650
Received on Ice (Y/N): Yes Temp: °C 5
PERC - Quarterly Effluent M/J/S/D
Adelanto WWTP
C2D0650
Laboratory Reference Number
Sample Description
04/06/22 05:20
Sampled Date/Time Received Date/Time
04/06/22 14:45
Matrix
Effluent Liquid
C2D0650-02
Analyte(s) Result RDL MDL Units Method Analysis Date Analyst Flag Cations
Sodium 110 1.0 0.66 mg/L EPA 200.7 04/13/22 23:12 HRL
Anions
Nitrate as N 0.45 0.20 0.16 mg/L EPA 300.0 04/07/22 01:56 DNF Nitrite as N ND 0.1 0.09 mg/L EPA 300.0 04/07/22 01:56 DNF Solids
Total Dissolved Solids 520 10 10 mg/L SM 2540C 04/12/22 19:55 AXM Total Suspended Solids 6 2 2 mg/L SM 2540D 04/13/22 23:55 RRC Aggregate Organic Compounds
Biochemical Oxygen Demand 9.0 5.0 5.0 mg/L SM 5210B 04/07/22 01:01 DFL Surfactants
MBAS 0.10 0.08 0.03 mg/L SM 5540C 04/07/22 08:30 TJK
Nutrients
Kjeldahl Nitrogen 3.1 0.4 0.4 mg/L EPA 351.2 04/22/22 19:39 TRS Total Nitrogen 3.6 0.70 mg/L Calculation
Metals and Metalloids
Boron 0.38 0.10 0.033 mg/L EPA 200.7 04/13/22 23:12 HRL mailing
P.O. Box 432
Riverside, CA 92502-0432
CA ELAP No. 2698
EPA No. CA00102
NELAP No. OR4035
LACSD No. 10119
P (951) 653-3351
F (951) 653-1662
www.babcocklabs.com
location
6100 Quail Valley Court
Riverside, CA 92507-0704
468
Client Name:

Report Date:

PERC Water Corp
19101 Jonathan St.

Dave Kachelski
Adelanto, CA 92301
Contact:

Address: Project Number:

Analytical Report: Page 11 of 12
Project Name:
29-Apr-2022
Work Order Number: C2D0650
Received on Ice (Y/N): Yes Temp: °C 5
PERC - Quarterly Effluent M/J/S/D
Adelanto WWTP
C2D0650
Notes and Definitions
J Estimated value
NR: Not Reported
ND: Analyte NOT DETECTED at or above the Method Detection Limit (if MDL is reported), otherwise at or above the Reportable Detection Limit (RDL)
RDL: Reportable Detection Limit
MDL: Method Detection Limit
* / (Non-NELAP): NELAP does not offer accreditation for this analyte/method/matrix combination e-Standard_No Alias.rpt
This report applies only to the sample(s) analyzed. As a mutual protection to clients, the public, and Babcock Laboratories, Inc., this report is submitted and accepted for the exclusive use of the Client to whom it is addressed. Interpretation and use of the information contained within this report are the sole responsibility of the Client. Babcock Laboratories, Inc. is not responsible for any misinformation or consequences that may result from misinterpretation or improper use of this report. This report is not to be modified or abbreviated in any way.

Additionally, this report is not to be used, in whole or in part, in any advertising or publicity matter without written authorization from Babcock Laboratories, Inc. The liability of Babcock Laboratories, Inc. is limited to the actual cost of the requested analyses, unless otherwise agreed upon in writing. There is no other warranty expressed or implied.

Enclosed are the analytical results for the submitted sample(s). Babcock Laboratories certify the data presented as part of this report meet the minimum quality standards in the referenced analytical methods. Any exceptions have been noted.

Approval
cc:

Alexis Nicole Harold For Cindy A. Waddell
mailing
P.O. Box 432
Riverside, CA 92502-0432
CA ELAP No. 2698
EPA No. CA00102
NELAP No. OR4035
LACSD No. 10119
P (951) 653-3351
F (951) 653-1662
www.babcocklabs.com
location
6100 Quail Valley Court
Riverside, CA 92507-0704
469
Client Name:

Report Date:

PERC Water Corp
19101 Jonathan St.

Dave Kachelski
Adelanto, CA 92301
Contact:

Address: Project Number:

Analytical Report: Page 12 of 12
Project Name:
29-Apr-2022
Work Order Number: C2D0650
Received on Ice (Y/N): Yes Temp: °C 5
PERC - Quarterly Effluent M/J/S/D
Adelanto WWTP
C2D0650
mailing
P.O. Box 432
Riverside, CA 92502-0432
CA ELAP No. 2698
EPA No. CA00102
NELAP No. OR4035
LACSD No. 10119
P (951) 653-3351
F (951) 653-1662
www.babcocklabs.com
location
6100 Quail Valley Court
Riverside, CA 92507-0704
470
Client Name:

Report Date:

PERC Water Corp
19101 Jonathan St.

Dave Kachelski
Adelanto, CA 92301
Contact:

Address:

Project Number:

Analytical Report: Page 1 of 4
Project Name:

Adelanto WWTP
PERC - Quarterly Effluent

M/J/S/D
15-Apr-2022 Work Order Number:

Received on Ice (Y/N): Yes Temp: °C 5
C2D0753
Attached is the analytical report for the sample(s) received for your project. Below is a list of the individual sample descriptions with the corresponding laboratory number(s). Also, enclosed is a copy of the Chain of Custody document (if received with your sample(s)). Please note any unused portion of the sample(s) may be responsibly discarded after 30 days from the above report date, unless you have requested otherwise.

Thank you for the opportunity to serve your analytical needs. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this report please contact our client service department.

Lab Sample # Client Sample ID Matrix Date Sampled
Sample Identification
By Date Submitted By
C2D0753-01 Liquid 04/06/22 05:20 Tristan Hause 04/06/22 14:45 Courier (Lisa Penunuri) -
DE
Effluent ---ROUTINE---
mailing
P.O. Box 432
Riverside, CA 92502-0432
CA ELAP No. 2698
EPA No. CA00102
NELAP No. OR4035
LACSD No. 10119
P (951) 653-3351
F (951) 653-1662
www.babcocklabs.com
Babcock Laboratories, Inc. - Riverside
6100 Quail Valley Court
Riverside, CA 92507-0704
471
Client Name:

Report Date:

PERC Water Corp
19101 Jonathan St.

Dave Kachelski
Adelanto, CA 92301
Contact:

Address:

Project Number:

Analytical Report: Page 2 of 4
Project Name:

Adelanto WWTP
PERC - Quarterly Effluent

M/J/S/D
15-Apr-2022 Work Order Number:

Received on Ice (Y/N): Yes Temp: °C 5
C2D0753
Laboratory Reference Number
Sample Description
04/06/22 05:20
Sampled Date/Time Received Date/Time
04/06/22 14:45
Matrix
Effluent Liquid
C2D0753-01
Analyte(s) Result RDL MDL Units Method Analysis Date Analyst Flag Testing performed by: Babcock Laboratories, Inc. - Riverside CA ELAP No. 2698, EPA No. CA00102, NELAP No. OR4035
Anions
Chloride 100 1.0 0.30 mg/L EPA 300.0 04/08/22 02:55 KBS Sulfate 110 0.50 0.23 mg/L EPA 300.0 04/08/22 02:55 KBS Fluoride 0.7 0.1 0.02 mg/L SM 4500F C 04/15/22 12:10 YVD Aggregate Organic Compounds
Phenols ND 0.020 0.013 mg/L EPA 420.4 04/14/22 12:53 YVD General Inorganics
Sulfide ND 0.10 0.10 mg/L SM 4500S2 D 04/13/22 09:10 BZB mailing
P.O. Box 432
Riverside, CA 92502-0432
CA ELAP No. 2698
EPA No. CA00102
NELAP No. OR4035
LACSD No. 10119
P (951) 653-3351
F (951) 653-1662
www.babcocklabs.com
Babcock Laboratories, Inc. - Riverside
6100 Quail Valley Court
Riverside, CA 92507-0704
472
Client Name:

Report Date:

PERC Water Corp
19101 Jonathan St.

Dave Kachelski
Adelanto, CA 92301
Contact:

Address:

Project Number:

Analytical Report: Page 3 of 4
Project Name:

Adelanto WWTP
PERC - Quarterly Effluent

M/J/S/D
15-Apr-2022 Work Order Number:

Received on Ice (Y/N): Yes Temp: °C 5
C2D0753
Notes and Definitions
J Estimated value
NR: Not Reported
ND: Analyte NOT DETECTED at or above the Method Detection Limit (if MDL is reported), otherwise at or above the Reportable Detection Limit (RDL)
RDL: Reportable Detection Limit
MDL: Method Detection Limit
* / ''' : NELAP does not offer accreditation for this analyte/method/matrix combination e-Short_No Alias.rpt
This report applies only to the sample(s) analyzed. As a mutual protection to clients, the public, and Babcock Laboratories, Inc., this report is submitted and accepted for the exclusive use of the Client to whom it is addressed. Interpretation and use of the information contained within this report are the sole responsibility of the Client. Babcock Laboratories, Inc. is not responsible for any misinformation or consequences that may result from misinterpretation or improper use of this report. This report is not to be modified or abbreviated in any way.

Additionally, this report is not to be used, in whole or in part, in any advertising or publicity matter without written authorization from Babcock Laboratories, Inc. The liability of Babcock Laboratories, Inc. is limited to the actual cost of the requested analyses, unless otherwise agreed upon in writing. There is no other warranty expressed or implied.

Enclosed are the analytical results for the submitted sample(s). Babcock Laboratories certify the data presented as part of this report meet the minimum quality standards in the referenced analytical methods. Any exceptions have been noted.

Approval
cc:

Alexis Nicole Harold For Cindy A. Waddell
mailing
P.O. Box 432
Riverside, CA 92502-0432
CA ELAP No. 2698
EPA No. CA00102
NELAP No. OR4035
LACSD No. 10119
P (951) 653-3351
F (951) 653-1662
www.babcocklabs.com
Babcock Laboratories, Inc. - Riverside
6100 Quail Valley Court
Riverside, CA 92507-0704
473
Client Name:

Report Date:

PERC Water Corp
19101 Jonathan St.

Dave Kachelski
Adelanto, CA 92301
Contact:

Address:

Project Number:

Analytical Report: Page 4 of 4
Project Name:

Adelanto WWTP
PERC - Quarterly Effluent

M/J/S/D
15-Apr-2022 Work Order Number:

Received on Ice (Y/N): Yes Temp: °C 5
C2D0753
mailing
P.O. Box 432
Riverside, CA 92502-0432
CA ELAP No. 2698
EPA No. CA00102
NELAP No. OR4035
LACSD No. 10119
P (951) 653-3351
F (951) 653-1662
www.babcocklabs.com
Babcock Laboratories, Inc. - Riverside
6100 Quail Valley Court
Riverside, CA 92507-0704
474
Client Name:

Report Date:

PERC Water Corp
19101 Jonathan St.

Dave Kachelski
Adelanto, CA 92301
Contact:

Address: Project Number:

Analytical Report: Page 1 of 10
Project Name:
03-May-2022
Work Order Number: C2D1498
Received on Ice (Y/N): Yes Temp: °C 2
PERC - Weekly/BiWeekly WW
Adelanto WWTP
C2D1498
Attached is the analytical report for the sample(s) received for your project. Below is a list of the individual sample descriptions with the corresponding laboratory number(s). Also, enclosed is a copy of the Chain of Custody document (if received with your sample(s)). Please note any unused portion of the sample(s) may be responsibly discarded after 30 days from the above report date, unless you have requested otherwise.

Thank you for the opportunity to serve your analytical needs. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this report please contact our client service department.

Sample Identification
Lab Sample # Client Sample ID Matrix Date Sampled By Date Submitted By C2D1498-01 Liquid 04/13/22 6:15 Tristan Hause Courier
(Guillermo)-DE
Influent Wastewater 04/13/22 10:55
C2D1498-02 Liquid 04/13/22 6:20 Tristan Hause Courier
(Guillermo)-DE
Effluent Wastewater 04/13/22 10:55
mailing
P.O. Box 432
Riverside, CA 92502-0432
CA ELAP No. 2698
EPA No. CA00102
NELAP No. OR4035
LACSD No. 10119
P (951) 653-3351
F (951) 653-1662
www.babcocklabs.com
location
6100 Quail Valley Court
Riverside, CA 92507-0704
475
Client Name:

Report Date:

PERC Water Corp
19101 Jonathan St.

Dave Kachelski
Adelanto, CA 92301
Contact:

Address: Project Number:

Analytical Report: Page 2 of 10
Project Name:
03-May-2022
Work Order Number: C2D1498
Received on Ice (Y/N): Yes Temp: °C 2
PERC - Weekly/BiWeekly WW
Adelanto WWTP
C2D1498
Laboratory Reference Number
Sample Description
04/13/22 06:15
Sampled Date/Time Received Date/Time
04/13/22 10:55
Matrix
Influent Liquid
C2D1498-01
Analyte(s) Result RDL MDL Units Method Analysis Date Analyst Flag Solids
Total Suspended Solids 280 20 20 mg/L SM 2540D 04/17/22 17:23 DFL Aggregate Organic Compounds
Biochemical Oxygen Demand 280 50 50 mg/L SM 5210B 04/13/22 21:42 DFL Nutrients
Ammonia-Nitrogen 40 5.1 mg/L SM4500NH3H
G

0.5 04/18/22 18:18 TRS
Kjeldahl Nitrogen 49 4.0 3.7 mg/L EPA 351.2 04/28/22 13:24 BAA mailing
P.O. Box 432
Riverside, CA 92502-0432
CA ELAP No. 2698
EPA No. CA00102
NELAP No. OR4035
LACSD No. 10119
P (951) 653-3351
F (951) 653-1662
www.babcocklabs.com
location
6100 Quail Valley Court
Riverside, CA 92507-0704
476
Client Name:

Report Date:

PERC Water Corp
19101 Jonathan St.

Dave Kachelski
Adelanto, CA 92301
Contact:

Address: Project Number:

Analytical Report: Page 3 of 10
Project Name:
03-May-2022
Work Order Number: C2D1498
Received on Ice (Y/N): Yes Temp: °C 2
PERC - Weekly/BiWeekly WW
Adelanto WWTP
C2D1498
Laboratory Reference Number
Sample Description
04/13/22 06:20
Sampled Date/Time Received Date/Time
04/13/22 10:55
Matrix
Effluent Liquid
C2D1498-02
Analyte(s) Result RDL MDL Units Method Analysis Date Analyst Flag Anions
Nitrate as N 1.2 0.20 0.16 mg/L EPA 300.0 04/14/22 07:11 DNF Nitrite as N 0.2 0.1 0.09 mg/L EPA 300.0 04/14/22 07:11 DNF Solids
Total Suspended Solids 4 2 2 mg/L SM 2540D 04/17/22 17:23 DFL Aggregate Organic Compounds
Biochemical Oxygen Demand ND 10 10 mg/L SM 5210B 04/13/22 21:46 DFL Nutrients
Kjeldahl Nitrogen 1.5 0.4 0.4 mg/L EPA 351.2 04/29/22 17:08 TRS Total Nitrogen 2.8 0.70 mg/L Calculation
mailing
P.O. Box 432
Riverside, CA 92502-0432
CA ELAP No. 2698
EPA No. CA00102
NELAP No. OR4035
LACSD No. 10119
P (951) 653-3351
F (951) 653-1662
www.babcocklabs.com
location
6100 Quail Valley Court
Riverside, CA 92507-0704
477
Client Name:

Report Date:

PERC Water Corp
19101 Jonathan St.

Dave Kachelski
Adelanto, CA 92301
Contact:

Address: Project Number:

Analytical Report: Page 9 of 10
Project Name:
03-May-2022
Work Order Number: C2D1498
Received on Ice (Y/N): Yes Temp: °C 2
PERC - Weekly/BiWeekly WW
Adelanto WWTP
C2D1498
Notes and Definitions
J Estimated value
NR: Not Reported
ND: Analyte NOT DETECTED at or above the Method Detection Limit (if MDL is reported), otherwise at or above the Reportable Detection Limit (RDL)
RDL: Reportable Detection Limit
MDL: Method Detection Limit
* / (Non-NELAP): NELAP does not offer accreditation for this analyte/method/matrix combination e-Standard_No Alias.rpt
This report applies only to the sample(s) analyzed. As a mutual protection to clients, the public, and Babcock Laboratories, Inc., this report is submitted and accepted for the exclusive use of the Client to whom it is addressed. Interpretation and use of the information contained within this report are the sole responsibility of the Client. Babcock Laboratories, Inc. is not responsible for any misinformation or consequences that may result from misinterpretation or improper use of this report. This report is not to be modified or abbreviated in any way.

Additionally, this report is not to be used, in whole or in part, in any advertising or publicity matter without written authorization from Babcock Laboratories, Inc. The liability of Babcock Laboratories, Inc. is limited to the actual cost of the requested analyses, unless otherwise agreed upon in writing. There is no other warranty expressed or implied.

Enclosed are the analytical results for the submitted sample(s). Babcock Laboratories certify the data presented as part of this report meet the minimum quality standards in the referenced analytical methods. Any exceptions have been noted.

Approval
cc:

Alexis Nicole Harold For Cindy A. Waddell
mailing
P.O. Box 432
Riverside, CA 92502-0432
CA ELAP No. 2698
EPA No. CA00102
NELAP No. OR4035
LACSD No. 10119
P (951) 653-3351
F (951) 653-1662
www.babcocklabs.com
location
6100 Quail Valley Court
Riverside, CA 92507-0704
478
Client Name:

Report Date:

PERC Water Corp
19101 Jonathan St.

Dave Kachelski
Adelanto, CA 92301
Contact:

Address: Project Number:

Analytical Report: Page 10 of 10
Project Name:
03-May-2022
Work Order Number: C2D1498
Received on Ice (Y/N): Yes Temp: °C 2
PERC - Weekly/BiWeekly WW
Adelanto WWTP
C2D1498
mailing
P.O. Box 432
Riverside, CA 92502-0432
CA ELAP No. 2698
EPA No. CA00102
NELAP No. OR4035
LACSD No. 10119
P (951) 653-3351
F (951) 653-1662
www.babcocklabs.com
location
6100 Quail Valley Court
Riverside, CA 92507-0704
479
Client Name:

Report Date:

PERC Water Corp
19101 Jonathan St.

Dave Kachelski
Adelanto, CA 92301
Contact:

Address: Project Number:

Analytical Report: Page 1 of 11
Project Name:
06-May-2022
Work Order Number: C2D2412
Received on Ice (Y/N): Yes Temp: °C 3
PERC - Weekly/BiWeekly WW
Adelanto WWTP
C2D2412
Attached is the analytical report for the sample(s) received for your project. Below is a list of the individual sample descriptions with the corresponding laboratory number(s). Also, enclosed is a copy of the Chain of Custody document (if received with your sample(s)). Please note any unused portion of the sample(s) may be responsibly discarded after 30 days from the above report date, unless you have requested otherwise.

Thank you for the opportunity to serve your analytical needs. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this report please contact our client service department.

Sample Identification
Lab Sample # Client Sample ID Matrix Date Sampled By Date Submitted By C2D2412-01 Liquid 04/20/22 5:30 Tristan Hause Courier
(Guillermo)-DE
Influent Wastewater 04/20/22 10:47
C2D2412-02 Liquid 04/20/22 5:40 Tristan Hause Courier
(Guillermo)-DE
Effluent Wastewater 04/20/22 10:47
mailing
P.O. Box 432
Riverside, CA 92502-0432
CA ELAP No. 2698
EPA No. CA00102
NELAP No. OR4035
LACSD No. 10119
P (951) 653-3351
F (951) 653-1662
www.babcocklabs.com
location
6100 Quail Valley Court
Riverside, CA 92507-0704
480
Client Name:

Report Date:

PERC Water Corp
19101 Jonathan St.

Dave Kachelski
Adelanto, CA 92301
Contact:

Address: Project Number:

Analytical Report: Page 2 of 11
Project Name:
06-May-2022
Work Order Number: C2D2412
Received on Ice (Y/N): Yes Temp: °C 3
PERC - Weekly/BiWeekly WW
Adelanto WWTP
C2D2412
Laboratory Reference Number
Sample Description
04/20/22 05:30
Sampled Date/Time Received Date/Time
04/20/22 10:47
Matrix
Influent Liquid
C2D2412-01
Analyte(s) Result RDL MDL Units Method Analysis Date Analyst Flag Solids
Total Dissolved Solids 700 20 20 mg/L SM 2540C 04/24/22 14:08 AMB Total Suspended Solids 240 10 10 mg/L SM 2540D 04/26/22 17:35 RRC Aggregate Organic Compounds
Biochemical Oxygen Demand 300 50 50 mg/L SM 5210B 04/20/22 21:49 AMB N-BOD1, N-BOD2
Nutrients
Ammonia-Nitrogen 43 5.1 mg/L SM4500NH3H
G

0.5 04/25/22 18:22 TRS
Kjeldahl Nitrogen 57 4.0 3.7 mg/L EPA 351.2 05/05/22 18:56 TRS mailing
P.O. Box 432
Riverside, CA 92502-0432
CA ELAP No. 2698
EPA No. CA00102
NELAP No. OR4035
LACSD No. 10119
P (951) 653-3351
F (951) 653-1662
www.babcocklabs.com
location
6100 Quail Valley Court
Riverside, CA 92507-0704
481
Client Name:

Report Date:

PERC Water Corp
19101 Jonathan St.

Dave Kachelski
Adelanto, CA 92301
Contact:

Address: Project Number:

Analytical Report: Page 3 of 11
Project Name:
06-May-2022
Work Order Number: C2D2412
Received on Ice (Y/N): Yes Temp: °C 3
PERC - Weekly/BiWeekly WW
Adelanto WWTP
C2D2412
Laboratory Reference Number
Sample Description
04/20/22 05:40
Sampled Date/Time Received Date/Time
04/20/22 10:47
Matrix
Effluent Liquid
C2D2412-02
Analyte(s) Result RDL MDL Units Method Analysis Date Analyst Flag Anions
Nitrate as N 0.25 0.20 0.16 mg/L EPA 300.0 04/21/22 18:40 EZV Nitrite as N ND 0.1 0.09 mg/L EPA 300.0 04/21/22 18:40 EZV Solids
Total Dissolved Solids 550 10 10 mg/L SM 2540C 04/24/22 14:08 AMB Total Suspended Solids 6 2 2 mg/L SM 2540D 04/26/22 17:35 RRC Aggregate Organic Compounds
Biochemical Oxygen Demand 9.3 5.0 5.0 mg/L SM 5210B 04/20/22 21:52 AMB N-BOD1, N-BOD2
Surfactants
MBAS 0.06 0.08 0.03 mg/L SM 5540C 04/20/22 21:45 DAD J
Nutrients
Kjeldahl Nitrogen 3.6 0.4 0.4 mg/L EPA 351.2 05/05/22 19:25 TRS Total Nitrogen 3.8 0.70 mg/L Calculation
mailing
P.O. Box 432
Riverside, CA 92502-0432
CA ELAP No. 2698
EPA No. CA00102
NELAP No. OR4035
LACSD No. 10119
P (951) 653-3351
F (951) 653-1662
www.babcocklabs.com
location
6100 Quail Valley Court
Riverside, CA 92507-0704
482
Client Name:

Report Date:

PERC Water Corp
19101 Jonathan St.

Dave Kachelski
Adelanto, CA 92301
Contact:

Address: Project Number:

Analytical Report: Page 10 of 11
Project Name:
06-May-2022
Work Order Number: C2D2412
Received on Ice (Y/N): Yes Temp: °C 3
PERC - Weekly/BiWeekly WW
Adelanto WWTP
C2D2412
Notes and Definitions
J Estimated value
N-BOD1 Dilution water blank exceeds 0.20 mg/L. As per method, data is reportable as qualified.

N-BOD2 The LCS is outside method acceptance limits. As per method, data is reportable as qualified.

Q-BOD2 This LCS is outside method acceptance limits. As per method, data is reportable as qualified.

QFpas Follow-up result within laboratory acceptance criteria.

QMint Due to matrix interference, the MS and/or MSD did not meet laboratory acceptance criteria.

NR: Not Reported
ND: Analyte NOT DETECTED at or above the Method Detection Limit (if MDL is reported), otherwise at or above the Reportable Detection Limit (RDL)
RDL: Reportable Detection Limit
MDL: Method Detection Limit
* / (Non-NELAP): NELAP does not offer accreditation for this analyte/method/matrix combination e-Standard_No Alias.rpt
This report applies only to the sample(s) analyzed. As a mutual protection to clients, the public, and Babcock Laboratories, Inc., this report is submitted and accepted for the exclusive use of the Client to whom it is addressed. Interpretation and use of the information contained within this report are the sole responsibility of the Client. Babcock Laboratories, Inc. is not responsible for any misinformation or consequences that may result from misinterpretation or improper use of this report. This report is not to be modified or abbreviated in any way.

Additionally, this report is not to be used, in whole or in part, in any advertising or publicity matter without written authorization from Babcock Laboratories, Inc. The liability of Babcock Laboratories, Inc. is limited to the actual cost of the requested analyses, unless otherwise agreed upon in writing. There is no other warranty expressed or implied.

Enclosed are the analytical results for the submitted sample(s). Babcock Laboratories certify the data presented as part of this report meet the minimum quality standards in the referenced analytical methods. Any exceptions have been noted.

Approval
cc:

Alexis Nicole Harold For Cindy A. Waddell
mailing
P.O. Box 432
Riverside, CA 92502-0432
CA ELAP No. 2698
EPA No. CA00102
NELAP No. OR4035
LACSD No. 10119
P (951) 653-3351
F (951) 653-1662
www.babcocklabs.com
location
6100 Quail Valley Court
Riverside, CA 92507-0704
483
Client Name:

Report Date:

PERC Water Corp
19101 Jonathan St.

Dave Kachelski
Adelanto, CA 92301
Contact:

Address: Project Number:

Analytical Report: Page 11 of 11
Project Name:
06-May-2022
Work Order Number: C2D2412
Received on Ice (Y/N): Yes Temp: °C 3
PERC - Weekly/BiWeekly WW
Adelanto WWTP
C2D2412
mailing
P.O. Box 432
Riverside, CA 92502-0432
CA ELAP No. 2698
EPA No. CA00102
NELAP No. OR4035
LACSD No. 10119
P (951) 653-3351
F (951) 653-1662
www.babcocklabs.com
location
6100 Quail Valley Court
Riverside, CA 92507-0704
484
Client Name:

Report Date:

PERC Water Corp
19101 Jonathan St.

Dave Kachelski
Adelanto, CA 92301
Contact:

Address: Project Number:

Analytical Report: Page 1 of 10
Project Name:
12-May-2022
Work Order Number: C2D3343
Received on Ice (Y/N): Yes Temp: °C 6
PERC - Weekly WW
Adelanto WWTP
C2D3343
Attached is the analytical report for the sample(s) received for your project. Below is a list of the individual sample descriptions with the corresponding laboratory number(s). Also, enclosed is a copy of the Chain of Custody document (if received with your sample(s)). Please note any unused portion of the sample(s) may be responsibly discarded after 30 days from the above report date, unless you have requested otherwise.

Thank you for the opportunity to serve your analytical needs. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this report please contact our client service department.

Sample Identification
Lab Sample # Client Sample ID Matrix Date Sampled By Date Submitted By C2D3343-01 Liquid 04/27/22 5:45 Tristan Hause Courier (Lisa Penunuri) - DE
Influent ---ROUTINE--- 04/27/22 13:56
C2D3343-02 Liquid 04/27/22 5:55 Tristan Hause Courier (Lisa Penunuri) - DE
Effluent ---ROUTINE--- 04/27/22 13:56
mailing
P.O. Box 432
Riverside, CA 92502-0432
CA ELAP No. 2698
EPA No. CA00102
NELAP No. OR4035
LACSD No. 10119
P (951) 653-3351
F (951) 653-1662
www.babcocklabs.com
location
6100 Quail Valley Court
Riverside, CA 92507-0704
485
Client Name:

Report Date:

PERC Water Corp
19101 Jonathan St.

Dave Kachelski
Adelanto, CA 92301
Contact:

Address: Project Number:

Analytical Report: Page 2 of 10
Project Name:
12-May-2022
Work Order Number: C2D3343
Received on Ice (Y/N): Yes Temp: °C 6
PERC - Weekly WW
Adelanto WWTP
C2D3343
Laboratory Reference Number
Sample Description
04/27/22 05:45
Sampled Date/Time Received Date/Time
04/27/22 13:56
Matrix
Influent Liquid
C2D3343-01
Analyte(s) Result RDL MDL Units Method Analysis Date Analyst Flag Solids
Total Suspended Solids 230 10 10 mg/L SM 2540D 05/03/22 22:32 RRC Aggregate Organic Compounds
Biochemical Oxygen Demand 230 50 50 mg/L SM 5210B 04/27/22 22:05 DFL Nutrients
Ammonia-Nitrogen 36 5.1 mg/L SM4500NH3H
G

0.5 05/02/22 21:42 TRS
Kjeldahl Nitrogen 46 4.0 3.7 mg/L EPA 351.2 05/09/22 22:58 TRS mailing
P.O. Box 432
Riverside, CA 92502-0432
CA ELAP No. 2698
EPA No. CA00102
NELAP No. OR4035
LACSD No. 10119
P (951) 653-3351
F (951) 653-1662
www.babcocklabs.com
location
6100 Quail Valley Court
Riverside, CA 92507-0704
486
Client Name:

Report Date:

PERC Water Corp
19101 Jonathan St.

Dave Kachelski
Adelanto, CA 92301
Contact:

Address: Project Number:

Analytical Report: Page 3 of 10
Project Name:
12-May-2022
Work Order Number: C2D3343
Received on Ice (Y/N): Yes Temp: °C 6
PERC - Weekly WW
Adelanto WWTP
C2D3343
Laboratory Reference Number
Sample Description
04/27/22 05:55
Sampled Date/Time Received Date/Time
04/27/22 13:56
Matrix
Effluent Liquid
C2D3343-02
Analyte(s) Result RDL MDL Units Method Analysis Date Analyst Flag Anions
Nitrate as N 0.27 0.20 0.16 mg/L EPA 300.0 04/27/22 23:58 DNF Nitrite as N ND 0.1 0.09 mg/L EPA 300.0 04/27/22 23:58 DNF Solids
Total Suspended Solids 2 2 2 mg/L SM 2540D 05/03/22 22:32 RRC Aggregate Organic Compounds
Biochemical Oxygen Demand ND 5.0 5.0 mg/L SM 5210B 04/27/22 22:24 DFL Nutrients
Kjeldahl Nitrogen 2.0 0.4 0.4 mg/L EPA 351.2 05/11/22 12:52 BAA Total Nitrogen 2.2 0.70 mg/L Calculation
mailing
P.O. Box 432
Riverside, CA 92502-0432
CA ELAP No. 2698
EPA No. CA00102
NELAP No. OR4035
LACSD No. 10119
P (951) 653-3351
F (951) 653-1662
www.babcocklabs.com
location
6100 Quail Valley Court
Riverside, CA 92507-0704
487
Client Name:

Report Date:

PERC Water Corp
19101 Jonathan St.

Dave Kachelski
Adelanto, CA 92301
Contact:

Address: Project Number:

Analytical Report: Page 9 of 10
Project Name:
12-May-2022
Work Order Number: C2D3343
Received on Ice (Y/N): Yes Temp: °C 6
PERC - Weekly WW
Adelanto WWTP
C2D3343
Notes and Definitions
J Estimated value
QFnt The referenced sample did not require this QC analyte, so a follow-up is not needed.

QMout MS and/or MSD recovery did not meet laboratory acceptance criteria.

QOcal The concentration indicated for this analyte is an estimated value above the calibration range of the instrument.

NR: Not Reported
ND: Analyte NOT DETECTED at or above the Method Detection Limit (if MDL is reported), otherwise at or above the Reportable Detection Limit (RDL)
RDL: Reportable Detection Limit
MDL: Method Detection Limit
* / (Non-NELAP): NELAP does not offer accreditation for this analyte/method/matrix combination e-Standard_No Alias.rpt
This report applies only to the sample(s) analyzed. As a mutual protection to clients, the public, and Babcock Laboratories, Inc., this report is submitted and accepted for the exclusive use of the Client to whom it is addressed. Interpretation and use of the information contained within this report are the sole responsibility of the Client. Babcock Laboratories, Inc. is not responsible for any misinformation or consequences that may result from misinterpretation or improper use of this report. This report is not to be modified or abbreviated in any way.

Additionally, this report is not to be used, in whole or in part, in any advertising or publicity matter without written authorization from Babcock Laboratories, Inc. The liability of Babcock Laboratories, Inc. is limited to the actual cost of the requested analyses, unless otherwise agreed upon in writing. There is no other warranty expressed or implied.

Enclosed are the analytical results for the submitted sample(s). Babcock Laboratories certify the data presented as part of this report meet the minimum quality standards in the referenced analytical methods. Any exceptions have been noted.

Approval
cc:

Alexis Nicole Harold For Cindy A. Waddell
mailing
P.O. Box 432
Riverside, CA 92502-0432
CA ELAP No. 2698
EPA No. CA00102
NELAP No. OR4035
LACSD No. 10119
P (951) 653-3351
F (951) 653-1662
www.babcocklabs.com
location
6100 Quail Valley Court
Riverside, CA 92507-0704
488
Client Name:

Report Date:

PERC Water Corp
19101 Jonathan St.

Dave Kachelski
Adelanto, CA 92301
Contact:

Address: Project Number:

Analytical Report: Page 10 of 10
Project Name:
12-May-2022
Work Order Number: C2D3343
Received on Ice (Y/N): Yes Temp: °C 6
PERC - Weekly WW
Adelanto WWTP
C2D3343
mailing
P.O. Box 432
Riverside, CA 92502-0432
CA ELAP No. 2698
EPA No. CA00102
NELAP No. OR4035
LACSD No. 10119
P (951) 653-3351
F (951) 653-1662
www.babcocklabs.com
location
6100 Quail Valley Court
Riverside, CA 92507-0704
489
Section H
Ground Water Monitoring
Report
490
5122 Bolsa Avenue, Suite 107• Huntington Beach, CA 92647 • (P) 714.890.7129 • (F) 714.890.7149 www.atlasenvironmental.com • License Number A729641
Since 1991
Remediation
Design and
Implementation
Programs

Groundwater,
Soil and Air
Compliance
Sampling and
Reporting

Phase I and II
Commercial and
Industrial Site
Assessments

Discharge
Permitting

Spill Prevention,
Countermeasur
es and Control

Environmental
Health and
Safety Specialists

Feasibility and
Risk Analysis

Hazardous
Waste
Management
and Monitoring

May 18, 2022
Mr. David Kachelski
Chief Plant Operator, Perc Water
City of Adelanto Waste Water Treatment Plant
11600 Air Expressway
Adelanto, California 92311
RE: Adelanto Waste Water Treatment Plant
Groundwater Monitoring Report
April 2022 Sampling
WDID No. R6V-2013-0058
Dear Mr. Kachelski,
Atlas Environmental Engineering, Inc. (ATLAS) is pleased to present the enclosed the Groundwater Monitoring Report – April 2022 Sampling, dated May 18, 2022, for the above referenced project. The report describes the semi-annual groundwater monitoring and sampling activities that occurred at the Adelanto Wastewater Treatment Plant. All sampling activities were conducted as outlined in the adopted board order #R6V-2013- 0058. If you have any questions or require any additional information, please contact me at (714) 890-7129.

Sincerely,
ATLAS ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, INC.

Karl H. Kerner, P.E.

Senior Engineer
491

GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT
APRIL 2022 SAMPLING

ADELANTO WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT

ADELANTO, CALIFORNIA
May 18, 2022
Prepared for:

City of Adelanto Waste Water Treatment Plant
11600 Air Expressway
Adelanto, California 92311
Prepared by:

ATLAS ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING, INC.
5122 Bolsa Avenue, Suite 107
Huntington Beach, California 92649
(714) 890-7129
492
SITE LOCATION: Adelanto Waste Water Treatment Plant
OWNER/OPERATOR: Perc Water
CONTACT: Mr. David Kachelski
LEAD AGENCY: Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board Introduction
Site Activities this Quarter
=
permit compliance.
= All groundwater monitoring wells were gauged and sampled as outlined in the WDR permit. Field data was recorded onto Project Status Reports and included in Appendix B.
= Well MW-1 was replaced with well MW-1A and therefore MW-1 was not sampled. = Gauging data from well BZ-01 was coordinated and obtained from the adjacent former George Air Force Base. = Groundwater gauging summary for BZ-01 is included in Appendix C. =
=
Appendix B. Well locations and groundwater elevation contours are included as Figures 2 and 3. = Groundwater monitoring well completion data, current groundwater elevation data and groundwater analytical results are included as Tables 1 and 2.
= Groundwater elevation over Time Graph is included as Figure 4. = Nitrate as Nitrogen Concentrations over Time Graph is included as Figure 5. = April 13, 2022 Analytical Report and associated Chain-of-Custody are included in Appendix D.

Future Site Activities
=
Gauging Summary
Total Groundwater Monitoring Wells: 10
Groundwater Monitoring Wells Gauged this Quarter: 10
Groundwater Monitoring Wells Sampled this Quarter: 10
Depth to Groundwater (ft bgs): 35.00 (MW-2) to 66.35 (MW-9) SC Logistic Airport Well (Former George AFB) (ft bgs): 62.51 BZ-01 Groundwater Elevation (msl): 2766.87 (MW-9) to 2804.83 (MW-2) Groundwater Gradient (ft/ft):

Groundwater Flow Direction:

Field Measurements
Conductivity 702 MW-5 to 861 MW-9
pH 6.00 MW-6 to 7.06 MW-1A
Temperature 21.66 MW-1A to 24.44 MW-5
Dissolved Oxygen 1.91 MW-6 to 7.31 MW-5
Turbidity 0.00 MW-9 to 18.80 MW-5

0.01 (North of the Site) / 0.002 (South of the Site)
NTU
All groundwater monitoring wells were analyzed for the constituents listed in the WDR permit. uS/cm
pH Units
mg/L
Measurements
Minimum Detection Maximum Detection Reported In
oC

GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT
APRIL 2022 SAMPLING
MAY 18, 2022
On April 13, 2022, groundwater monitoring and sampling were conducted as part of the semi-annual schedule for WDR Approximately 26.4 gallons of groundwater were purged prior to sampling wells using low flow sampling techniques.

The work has been conducted in accordance with the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Lahontan Region’s Board Order No. R6V-2013-0058 Waste Discharge Requirements (WDR) for Adelanto Waste Water Treatment Plant. A site description and geologic and hydrologic information are included in Appendix A and site vicinity map included as Figure 1.

ADELANTO WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT
Purge water was disposed of on adjacent land surfaces at each well. Low flow sampling procedures are included in Semi-annual groundwater monitoring and sampling anticipated for October 2022 and reporting by December 2022.

Variable
5122 Bolsa Avenue, Suite 107 • Huntington Beach, CA 92649 • (P) 714.890.7129 • (F) 714.890.7149 www.atlasenvironmental.com • License Number A729641
AWWTP-APR2022xls Page 1 of 3
493
494
Attachments
Figures
Figure 1 - Site Vicinity Map
Figure 2 - Groundwater Monitoring Well Locations
Figure 3 - Groundwater Elevation Contour
Figure 4 - Groundwater Elevation over Time Graph
Figure 5 - Nitrate as N Concentrations over Time Graph
Tables
Table 1 - Groundwater Monitoring Well Completion Data
Table 2 - Current Groundwater Quality Analysis
Table 3 - Historic Groundwater Quality Analysis
Appendix A
Site Description, Geologic and Hydrogeologic Background Appendix B
April 2022 Project Status Reports, Field Data Sheets and Sampling Procedures Appendix C
Groundwater Gauging Summary - BZ-01
Appendix D
April 2022 Analytical Report and Chain-of-Custody
www.atlasenvironmental.com • License Number A729641
5122 Bolsa Avenue, Suite 107 • Huntington Beach, CA 92649 • (P) 714.890.7129 • (F) 714.890.7149 AWWTP-APR2022xls Page 3 of 3
495

FIGURES
496
USGS Map Name: Adelanto, California
5122 Bolsa Ave, #107
Huntington Beach,
California 92649

ADELANTO WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT
19101 JONATHAN STREET
ADELANTO, CALIFORNIA 92301

SITE VICINITY MAP
FIGURE 1
SITE
497
498
499
2750
2760277027802790280028102820
07/06/09 11/18/10 04/01/12 08/14/13 12/27/14 05/10/16 09/22/17 02/04/19 06/18/20 10/31/21 03/15/23 E‐Water (ft msl)
Date
FIGURE 4
Groundwater Elevation over Time
Adelanto Wastewater Treatment Plant
Adelanto, California
MW‐1AMW‐2MW‐3MW‐4MW‐5MW‐6MW‐7MW‐8MW‐9MW‐10
500
0 2468
10121416182022242628303234363840
07/06/09 11/18/10 04/01/12 08/14/13 12/27/14 05/10/16 09/22/17 02/04/19 06/18/20 10/31/21 03/15/23 Nitrate as N (mg/L)
Date
Figure 5
Nitrate as Nitrogen Concentrations over Time
Adelanto Wastewater Treatment Plant
Adelanto, California
MW‐1AMW‐2MW‐3MW‐4MW‐5MW‐6MW‐7MW‐8MW‐9MW‐10
501
TABLES
502
DIAMETER SCREEN Total  SWE
(inches) INTERVAL Depth (ft msl)
(ft bgs) (ft bgs)
MW‐1 2 150‐172 172 ‐
MW‐1A 4 80‐100 101 2844.46
MW‐2 2 90‐120 120 2839.83
MW‐3 2 90‐120 120 2846.24
MW‐4 2 61‐101 101 2849.28
MW‐5 2 69‐114 114 2858.89
MW‐6 2 40‐89.5 89.5 2833.24
MW‐7 4 75‐105 106 2842.57
MW‐8 4 55‐85 86 2833.6
MW‐9 4 74‐104 105 2833.22
MW‐10 4 70‐100 101 2850.75
Notes:

SWE ‐ Surveyed Well Elevation
ft msl ‐ Feet Mean Sea Level
ft bgs ‐ Feet Below Ground Surface
WELL ID
TABLE 1
WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAIL
ADELANTO WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT
ADELANTO, CALIFORNIA

Page 1 of 1 ends

503
MW‐1A 4/13/22 2844.46 40.06 2804.40 734 7.06 21.66 6.23 6.60 470 0.59 0.43 110 96 0.70 0.5 MW‐2 4/13/22 2839.83 35.00 2804.83 789 6.39 22.61 2.63 23.30 520 2.10 1.10 100 100 0.73 0.7MW‐3 4/13/22 2846.24 43.80 2802.44 767 6.32 24.16 6.31 3.20 510 0.47 0.47 100 110 0.26 0.4MW‐4 4/13/22 2849.28 51.70 2797.58 753 6.77 22.88 4.80 53.90 500 1.90 1.90 96 110 0.15 0.5 MW‐5 4/13/22 2858.89 63.72 2795.17 702 6.51 24.44 7.31 18.80 470 3.30 3.30 84 110 0.054 0.5 MW‐6 4/13/22 2833.24 42.41 2790.83 791 6.00 23.88 1.91 7.50 520 0.48 0.37 100 100 0.35 0.6MW‐7 4/13/22 2842.57 58.81 2783.76 806 6.42 23.88 2.19 1.60 540 0.87 0.87 100 110 0.25 0.4 MW‐8 4/13/22 2833.60 45.00 2788.60 849 6.19 24.38 1.99 7.70 560 0.70 0.48 110 110 0.33 0.5 MW‐9 4/13/22 2833.22 66.35 2766.87 861 6.43 22.33 6.79 0.00 580 1.30 1.10 110 130 0.24 0.4 MW‐10 4/13/22 2850.75 55.93 2794.82 784 6.47 22.72 4.00 3.60 520 <1.6 1.50 110 110 0.18 0.4 SWE TDSDTW ftE‐Water  ft msl‐ Chemical  std units
NS mg/lN/A J+ NTU
E‐Water
(ft msl) Cond. (uS/cm) pH              (pH Units)
Nephelometric Turbity Unit
Total
Nitrogen
(mg/L)
Nitrate as
Nitrogen
(mg/L)
Chloride
(mg/L)
TABLE 2
CURRENT GROUNDWATER QUALITY ANALYSIS
Adelanto Wastewater Treatment Plant
Adelanto, California
Sample ID Sample Date SWE (ft msl)
FIELD MEASUREMENTS LABORATORY ANALYSES
DTW
(ft)
Sulfate
(mg/L)
Boron
(mg/L)
Fluoride
(mg/L)
Notes:

Survey Well Elevation Total Dissolved Solids
Temperature
(oc) DO      (mg/L) TDS         (mg/L)
Depth to Water FeetElevation of Water Feet Mean Sea Level Standard pH units
No MCL or California Secondary MCL for Drinking Water Milligram per liter or parts per millionNot Available / Not Accessible / No Sample Collected Result is above the MDL, but below the PQL; Value is approximateRe‐sampled on alternate date due to lab holding time expiration for sample 10/18/2021.

Turbidity
(NTU)

Page 1 of 1 ends

504
MW‐1A 2/23/2012 2844.46 2781.36 5.30 5.3
MW‐1A 5/17/2012 2844.46 2781.36 7.80 7.8MW‐1A 8/15/2012 2844.46 2780.98 7.50 7.5MW‐1A 11/15/2012 2844.46 2781.47 7.00 7 MW‐1A 2/13/2013 2844.46 2779.36 4.50 4.5MW‐1A 5/16/2013 2844.46 2792.27 21.00 21MW‐1A 7/11/2013 2844.46 2794.56 3.80 3.8MW‐1A 4/18/2014 2844.46 2800.64 0.20 2.7MW‐1A 10/17/2014 2844.46 2798.66 0.34 0.2MW‐1A 4/15/2015 2844.46 2802.66 2.70 0.34 MW‐1A 10/22/2015 2844.46 2799.42 0.20 0.2MW‐1A 4/14/2016 2844.46 2798.31 0.44 0.44 MW‐1A 10/13/2016 2844.46 2804.7 0.84 0.84
MW‐1A 4/14/2017 2844.46 2801.29 1.20 1.2MW‐1A 10/12/2017 2844.46 2801.45 0.51 0.51 MW‐1A 4/19/2018 2844.46 2801.67 0.20 0.2MW‐1A 10/18/2018 2844.46 2806.01 0.50 0.5MW‐1A 4/11/2019 2844.46 2805.56 0.17 0.17 MW‐1A 10/17/2019 2844.46 2803.36 0.69 0.69
MW‐1A 4/16/2020 2844.46 2806.96 0.59 0.59
MW‐1A 10/23/2020 2844.46 2803.31 1.60 1.6
MW‐1A 4/7/2021 2844.46 42.42 2802.04 903 6.88 18.97 6.22 480.00 1.00 0.73 110 100 0.36 0.5 MW‐1A+ 12/03/21 2844.46 36.70 2807.76 840 7.70 21.11 4.11 460.00 0.83 0.83 120 110 0.37 0.5 MW‐1A 4/13/22 2844.46 40.06 2804.40 734 7.06 21.66 6.23 6.60 470 0.59 0.43 110 96 0.70 0.5 MW‐2 12/18/2010 2839.83 2784.23MW‐2 2/23/2011 2839.83 2784.08MW‐2 6/9/2011 2839.83 2783.73MW‐2 8/22/2011 2839.83 2784.33MW‐2 10/24/2011 2839.83 2783.15MW‐2 2/23/2012 2839.83 2782.35 0.20 0.2MW‐2 5/17/2012 2839.83 2782.63 0.20 0.2 MW‐2 8/15/2012 2839.83 2781.59 0.20 0.2
MW‐2 11/15/2012 2839.83 2781.61 0.20 0.2
MW‐2 2/13/2013 2839.83 2779.46 0.20 0.2
MW‐2 5/16/2013 2839.83 2785.9 5.90 0.2
MW‐2 10/11/2013 2839.83 2790.33 3.20 3.2
MW‐2 4/18/2014 2839.83 2796.02 0.20 0.71
MW‐2 10/17/2014 2839.83 2797.93 0.20 0.2
MW‐2 4/15/2015 2839.83 2798.32 0.71 0.2
MW‐2 10/22/2015 2839.83 2796.04 0.20 0.2
MW‐2 4/14/2016 2839.83 2801.08 0.20 0.2
Cond. (uS/cm) pH              (pH Units)
TABLE 3
HISTORICAL GROUNDWATER QUALITY ANALYSIS
Adelanto Wastewater Treatment Plant
Adelanto, California
Sample ID Sample Date SWE (ft msl)
FIELD MEASUREMENTS LABORATORY ANALYSES
DTW
(ft)
E‐Water
(ft msl)
Chloride
(mg/L)
Sulfate
(mg/L) Boron  (mg/L) Fluoride       (mg/L) Temperature (oc) DO      (mg/L) TDS          (mg/L) Total Nitrogen  (mg/L) Nitrate as  Nitrogen  (mg/L) Turbidity      (NTU)

Page 1 of 7 ends

505
Cond. (uS/cm) pH              (pH Units)
TABLE 3
HISTORICAL GROUNDWATER QUALITY ANALYSIS
Adelanto Wastewater Treatment Plant
Adelanto, California
Sample ID Sample Date SWE (ft msl)
FIELD MEASUREMENTS LABORATORY ANALYSES
DTW
(ft)
E‐Water
(ft msl)
Chloride
(mg/L)
Sulfate
(mg/L) Boron  (mg/L) Fluoride       (mg/L) Temperature (oc) DO      (mg/L) TDS          (mg/L) Total Nitrogen  (mg/L) Nitrate as  Nitrogen  (mg/L) Turbidity      (NTU) MW‐2 10/13/2016 2839.83 2801.58 0.20 0.2
MW‐2 4/14/2017 2839.83 2799.33 0.55 0.55
MW‐2 10/12/2017 2839.83 2799.33 0.32 0.32
MW‐2 4/19/2018 2839.83 2799.98 1.20 1.2
MW‐2 10/18/2018 2839.83 2808.94 2.20 2.2MW‐2 4/11/2019 2839.83 2809.27 0.20 0.2MW‐2 10/17/2019 2839.83 2801.55 0.36 0.36 MW‐2 4/16/2020 2839.83 2810.59 0.20 0.2
MW‐2 10/23/2020 2839.83 2810.07 0.20 0.2MW‐2 4/7/2021 2839.83 39.57 2800.26 872 7.39 20.42 1.40 480.00 1.80 0.63 100 100 0.42 0.7MW‐2 10/18/21 2839.83 36.22 2803.61 906 7.08 18.40 2.08 520.00 4.50 0.22 100 100 0.38 0.7MW‐2 4/13/22 2839.83 35.00 2804.83 789 6.39 22.61 2.63 23.30 520 2.10 1.10 100 100 0.73 0.7MW‐3 12/18/2010 2846.24 2784.24MW‐3 2/23/2011 2846.24 2783.34MW‐3 6/9/2011 2846.24 2783.04MW‐3 8/22/2011 2846.24 2783.49MW‐3 10/24/2011 2846.24 2782.74MW‐3 2/23/2012 2846.24 2782.01MW‐3 5/17/2012 2846.24 2781.75MW‐3 8/15/2012 2846.24 2781.24MW‐3 11/15/2012 2846.24 2781.14MW‐3 2/13/2013 2846.24 2779.93 0.20 0.20 MW‐3 5/16/2013 2846.24 2781.51MW‐3 7/11/2013 2846.24 2784.06 1.40 1.40 MW‐3 4/1/2014 2846.24 2789.9 2.80 3.90
MW‐3 10/1/2014 2846.24 2793.05 1.60 2.80
MW‐3 4/15/2015 2846.24 2793.64 3.90 1.60
MW‐3 10/22/2015 2846.24 2796.26 1.40 1.40MW‐3 4/14/2016 2846.24 2796.57 1.50 1.50 MW‐3 10/13/2016 2846.24 2798.04 1.20 1.20
MW‐3 4/14/2017 2846.24 2798.1 1.50 1.50
MW‐3 10/12/2017 2846.24 2787.91 0.92 0.92MW‐3 4/19/2018 2846.24 2798.53 1.00 1.00 MW‐3 10/18/2018 2846.24 2799.34 1.20 1.20
MW‐3 4/11/2019 2846.24 2799.99 0.62 0.62
MW‐3 10/17/2019 2846.24 2800.89 0.51 0.51
MW‐3 4/16/2020 2846.24 2800.89 0.29 0.29MW‐3 10/23/2020 2846.24 2801.16 0.20 0.20 MW‐3 4/7/2021 2846.24 45.63 2800.61 880 7.54 22.76 2.35 490.00 0.61 0.61 99 120.00 0.28 0.40MW‐3 10/18/21 2846.24 46.20 2800.04 880 8.18 20.52 1.91 510.00 0.71 0.71 94 120 0.29 0.50MW‐3 4/13/22 2846.24 43.80 2802.44 767 6.32 24.16 6.31 3.20 510 0.47 0.47 100 110 0.26 0.4

Page 2 of 7 ends

506
Cond. (uS/cm) pH              (pH Units)
TABLE 3
HISTORICAL GROUNDWATER QUALITY ANALYSIS
Adelanto Wastewater Treatment Plant
Adelanto, California
Sample ID Sample Date SWE (ft msl)
FIELD MEASUREMENTS LABORATORY ANALYSES
DTW
(ft)
E‐Water
(ft msl)
Chloride
(mg/L)
Sulfate
(mg/L) Boron  (mg/L) Fluoride       (mg/L) Temperature (oc) DO      (mg/L) TDS          (mg/L) Total Nitrogen  (mg/L) Nitrate as  Nitrogen  (mg/L) Turbidity      (NTU) MW‐4 12/18/2010 2849.28 2783.08MW‐4 2/23/2011 2849.28 2783.28MW‐4 6/9/2011 2849.28 2782.58MW‐4 8/22/2011 2849.28 2782.28MW‐4 10/24/2011 2849.28 2781.98MW‐4 2/23/2012 2849.28 2781.47 11.00 11.00MW‐4 5/17/2012 2849.28 2781.17 12.00 12.00 MW‐4 8/15/2012 2849.28 2780.7 15.00 15.00
MW‐4 11/15/2012 2849.28 2780.32 21.00 21.00
MW‐4 2/13/2013 2849.28 2779.88 28.00 28.00MW‐4 5/16/2013 2849.28 2779.76 20.00 20.00 MW‐4 7/11/2013 2849.28 2779.78 8.20 8.20
MW‐4 4/1/2014 2849.28 2782.12 6.40 6.50
MW‐4 10/1/2014 2849.28 2783.49 5.20 6.40
MW‐4 4/15/2015 2849.28 2784.61 6.50 5.20
MW‐4 10/22/2015 2849.28 2785.77 4.30 4.30
MW‐4 4/14/2016 2849.28 2787.21 4.10 4.10
MW‐4 10/13/2016 2849.28 2787.58 3.70 3.70
MW‐4 4/14/2017 2849.28 2789.18 4.20 4.20
MW‐4 10/12/2017 2849.28 2789.03 3.60 3.60
MW‐4 4/19/2018 2849.28 2789.78 3.60 3.60
MW‐4 10/18/2018 2849.28 2789.76 3.70 3.70
MW‐4 4/11/2019 2849.28 2790.4 3.20 3.20
MW‐4 10/17/2019 2849.28 2791.23 3.00 3.00
MW‐4 4/16/2020 2849.28 2791.26 2.50 2.50
MW‐4 10/23/2020 2849.28 2792.31 2.40 2.40
MW‐4 4/07/21 2849.28 56.92 2792.36 892 7.85 22.82 5.16 510.00 3.10 2.40 98 120.00 0.17 0.50MW‐4 10/18/21 2849.28 57.00 2792.28 887 9.24 20.53 4.90 520.00 2.50 2.50 92 120 0.17 0.50MW‐4 4/13/22 2849.28 51.70 2797.58 753 6.77 22.88 4.80 53.90 500 1.90 1.90 96 110 0.15 0.5MW‐5 12/18/2010 2858.89 2782.99MW‐5 2/23/2011 2858.89 2783.20MW‐5 6/9/2011 2858.89 2782.44MW‐5 8/22/2011 2858.89 2782.28MW‐5 10/24/2011 2858.89 2782.09MW‐5 2/23/2012 2858.89 2781.51 10.00 10.00 MW‐5 5/17/2012 2858.89 2781.26 12.00 12.00
MW‐5 8/15/2012 2858.89 2780.79 11.00 11.00
MW‐5 11/15/2012 2858.89 2780.49 11.00 11.00
MW‐5 2/13/2013 2858.89 2779.98 13.00 13.00
MW‐5 5/16/2013 2858.89 2779.89 14.00 14.00

Page 3 of 7 ends

507
Cond. (uS/cm) pH              (pH Units)
TABLE 3
HISTORICAL GROUNDWATER QUALITY ANALYSIS
Adelanto Wastewater Treatment Plant
Adelanto, California
Sample ID Sample Date SWE (ft msl)
FIELD MEASUREMENTS LABORATORY ANALYSES
DTW
(ft)
E‐Water
(ft msl)
Chloride
(mg/L)
Sulfate
(mg/L) Boron  (mg/L) Fluoride       (mg/L) Temperature (oc) DO      (mg/L) TDS          (mg/L) Total Nitrogen  (mg/L) Nitrate as  Nitrogen  (mg/L) Turbidity      (NTU) MW‐5 7/11/2013 2858.89 2780.11 5.20 5.20
MW‐5 4/18/2014 2858.89 2787.64 4.50 4.50
MW‐5 10/17/2014 2858.89 2789.90 4.30 4.50
MW‐5 4/15/2015 2858.89 2786.44 4.50 4.30
MW‐5 10/22/2015 2858.89 2789.74 4.00 4.00
MW‐5 4/14/2016 2858.89 2791.49 4.00 4.00
MW‐5 10/13/2016 2858.89 2791.45 3.90 3.90
MW‐5 4/14/2017 2858.89 2792.45 3.80 3.80
MW‐5 10/12/2017 2858.89 2792.45 3.40 3.40
MW‐5 4/19/2018 2858.89 2792.14 3.90 3.90
MW‐5 10/18/2018 2858.89 2792.99 4.20 4.20
MW‐5 4/11/2019 2858.89 2793.99 3.80 3.80
MW‐5 10/17/2019 2858.89 2793.77 3.70 3.70
MW‐5 4/16/2020 2858.89 2794.54 3.20 3.20
MW‐5 10/23/2020 2858.89 2795.19 3.20 3.20
MW‐5 4/07/21 2858.89 63.70 2795.19 812 7.50 23.15 6.37 460.00 3.80 3.80 83 120.0 0.06 0.5MW‐5 10/18/21 2858.89 64.32 2794.57 806 9.09 20.64 7.20 460.00 3.80 3.80 78 120 0.051 0.5MW‐5 4/13/22 2858.89 63.72 2795.17 702 6.51 24.44 7.31 18.80 470 3.30 3.30 84 110 0.054 0.5MW‐6 12/18/2010 2833.24 2773.94MW‐6 2/23/2011 2833.24 2774.09MW‐6 6/9/2011 2833.24 2773.34MW‐6 8/22/2011 2833.24 2773.43MW‐6 10/24/2011 2833.24 2773.14MW‐6 2/23/2012 2833.24 2772.47 1.60 1.60 MW‐6 5/17/2012 2833.24 2772.23 2.60 2.60
MW‐6 8/15/2012 2833.24 2771.46 2.70 2.70
MW‐6 11/15/2012 2833.24 2771.46 2.90 2.90
MW‐6 2/13/2013 2833.24 2770.75 2.50 2.50MW‐6 5/16/2013 2833.24 2772.03 1.90 1.90 MW‐6 7/11/2013 2833.24 2774.44 8.20 8.20
MW‐6 4/18/2014 2833.24 2780.87 25.00 37.00
MW‐6 10/17/2014 2833.24 2783.87 18.00 25.00
MW‐6 4/15/2015 2833.24 2784.31 37.00 18.00
MW‐6 10/22/2015 2833.24 2785.49 11.00 11.00
MW‐6 4/14/2016 2833.24 2783.14 8.80 8.80
MW‐6 10/13/2016 2833.24 2787.15 5.30 5.30
MW‐6 4/14/2017 2833.24 2785.64 5.70 5.70
MW‐6 10/12/2017 2833.24 2787.84 3.80 3.80MW‐6 4/19/2018 2833.24 2787.12 3.10 3.10 MW‐6 10/18/2018 2833.24 2789.51 2.00 2.00
MW‐6 4/11/2019 2833.24 2790.24 0.76 0.76

Page 4 of 7 ends

508
Cond. (uS/cm) pH              (pH Units)
TABLE 3
HISTORICAL GROUNDWATER QUALITY ANALYSIS
Adelanto Wastewater Treatment Plant
Adelanto, California
Sample ID Sample Date SWE (ft msl)
FIELD MEASUREMENTS LABORATORY ANALYSES
DTW
(ft)
E‐Water
(ft msl)
Chloride
(mg/L)
Sulfate
(mg/L) Boron  (mg/L) Fluoride       (mg/L) Temperature (oc) DO      (mg/L) TDS          (mg/L) Total Nitrogen  (mg/L) Nitrate as  Nitrogen  (mg/L) Turbidity      (NTU) MW‐6 10/17/2019 2833.24 2790.44 1.20 1.20
MW‐6 4/16/2020 2833.24 2790.52 0.42 0.42
MW‐6 10/23/2020 2833.24 2789.54 0.85 0.85
MW‐6 4/07/21 2833.24 43.22 2790.02 1010 8.12 21.57 2.91 560.00 0.90 0.76 120 130.0 0.37 0.5 MW‐6 10/18/21 2833.24 41.63 2791.61 966 7.65 19.54 1.91 550.00 0.63 0.53 110 120.0 0.40 0.6MW‐6 4/13/22 2833.24 42.41 2790.83 791 6.00 23.88 1.91 7.50 520 0.48 0.37 100 100 0.35 0.6MW‐7 2/23/2012 2842.57 2765.54 1.40 1.40MW‐7 5/17/2012 2842.57 2765.36 1.30 1.30 MW‐7 8/15/2012 2842.57 2765.07 1.20 1.20
MW‐7 11/15/2012 2842.57 2764.84 1.10 1.10
MW‐7 2/13/2013 2842.57 2764.61 1.30 1.30
MW‐7 5/16/2013 2842.57 2765.61 0.88 0.88
MW‐7 7/11/2013 2842.57 2765.07 1.00 1.00
MW‐7 4/1/2014 2842.57 2772.11 2.60 1.60
MW‐7 10/1/2014 2842.57 2773.72 3.20 2.60
MW‐7 4/15/2015 2842.57 2766.22 1.60 3.20
MW‐7 10/22/2015 2842.57 2776.13 3.20 3.20
MW‐7 4/14/2016 2842.57 2776.68 3.30 3.30
MW‐7 10/13/2016 2842.57 2778.49 2.50 2.50
MW‐7 4/14/2017 2842.57 2778.63 2.10 2.10
MW‐7 10/12/2017 2842.57 2780.04 1.60 1.60
MW‐7 4/19/2018 2842.57 2779.71 1.70 1.70
MW‐7 10/18/2018 2842.57 2781.82 1.50 1.50
MW‐7 4/11/2019 2842.57 2782.42 1.10 1.10
MW‐7 10/17/2019 2842.57 2782.77 1.10 1.10
MW‐7 4/16/2020 2842.57 2783.05 0.74 0.74
MW‐7 10/23/2020 2842.57 2782.93 0.86 0.86
MW‐7 4/07/21 2842.57 59.21 2783.36 929 7.42 22.37 2.11 520.00 1.00 1.00 100 110.0 0.27 0.4MW‐7 10/18/21 2842.57 58.00 2784.57 909 8.68 19.98 1.41 520.00 1.00 1.00 96 120.0 0.27 0.4MW‐7 4/13/22 2842.57 58.81 2783.76 806 6.42 23.88 2.19 1.60 540 0.87 0.87 100 110 0.25 0.4MW‐8 2/23/2012 2833.60 2771.61 2.30 2.30 MW‐8 5/17/2012 2833.60 2771.33 2.10 2.10
MW‐8 8/15/2012 2833.60 2770.85 2.20 2.20
MW‐8 11/15/2012 2833.60 2770.5 2.40 2.40
MW‐8 2/13/2013 2833.60 2769.87 2.30 2.30
MW‐8 5/16/2013 2833.60 2770.5 1.30 1.30
MW‐8 7/11/2013 2833.60 2772.22 3.00 3.00
MW‐8 4/18/2014 2833.60 2777.85 16.00 5.00
MW‐8 10/17/2014 2833.60 2780.40 24.00 16.00
MW‐8 4/15/2015 2833.60 2781.45 5.00 24.00

Page 5 of 7 ends

509
Cond. (uS/cm) pH              (pH Units)
TABLE 3
HISTORICAL GROUNDWATER QUALITY ANALYSIS
Adelanto Wastewater Treatment Plant
Adelanto, California
Sample ID Sample Date SWE (ft msl)
FIELD MEASUREMENTS LABORATORY ANALYSES
DTW
(ft)
E‐Water
(ft msl)
Chloride
(mg/L)
Sulfate
(mg/L) Boron  (mg/L) Fluoride       (mg/L) Temperature (oc) DO      (mg/L) TDS          (mg/L) Total Nitrogen  (mg/L) Nitrate as  Nitrogen  (mg/L) Turbidity      (NTU) MW‐8 10/22/2015 2833.60 2782.85 33.00 33.00
MW‐8 4/14/2016 2833.60 2781.11 38.00 38.00
MW‐8 10/13/2016 2833.60 2784.07 21.00 21.00
MW‐8 4/14/2017 2833.60 2783.16 18.00 18.00
MW‐8 10/12/2017 2833.60 2785.09 12.00 12.00
MW‐8 4/19/2018 2833.60 2784.6 7.10 7.10MW‐8 10/18/2018 2833.60 2786.47 4.70 4.70 MW‐8 4/11/2019 2833.60 2787.34 2.80 2.80
MW‐8 10/17/2019 2833.60 2787.77 2.10 2.10
MW‐8 4/16/2020 2833.60 2787.92 1.30 1.30
MW‐8 10/23/2020 2833.60 2787.49 1.00 1.00
MW‐8 4/07/21 2833.60 45.66 2787.94 1020 8.50 21.92 2.08 580.00 2.10 2.10 120 120.0 0.39 0.5MW‐8 10/18/21 2833.60 44.55 2789.05 951 7.36 20.12 1.59 540.00 1.20 1.20 110 120.0 0.41 0.5MW‐8 4/13/22 2833.60 45.00 2788.60 849 6.19 24.38 1.99 7.70 560 0.70 0.48 110 110 0.33 0.5MW‐9 2/23/2012 2833.22 2751.21 3.70 3.70 MW‐9 5/17/2012 2833.22 2751.31 3.50 3.50
MW‐9 8/15/2012 2833.22 2751.19 3.20 3.20
MW‐9 11/15/2012 2833.22 2750.99 3.30 3.30
MW‐9 2/13/2013 2833.22 2750.7 3.10 3.10
MW‐9 5/16/2013 2833.22 2750.73 2.80 2.80
MW‐9 7/11/2013 2833.22 2750.75 3.00 3.00
MW‐9 4/18/2014 2833.22 2752.93 2.90 2.50MW‐9 10/17/2014 2833.22 2754.71 3.20 2.90 MW‐9 4/15/2015 2833.22 2756 2.50 3.20
MW‐9 10/22/2015 2833.22 2757.28 3.70 3.70MW‐9 4/14/2016 2833.22 2758.05 4.10 4.10 MW‐9 10/13/2016 2833.22 2759.12 3.40 3.40
MW‐9 4/14/2017 2833.22 2759.92 3.30 3.30
MW‐9 10/12/2017 2833.22 2761.02 2.80 2.80
MW‐9 4/19/2018 2833.22 2761.51 3.00 3.00MW‐9 10/18/2018 2833.22 2762.64 2.80 2.80 MW‐9 4/11/2019 2833.22 2763.72 2.30 2.30
MW‐9 10/17/2019 2833.22 2764.24 2.10 2.10
MW‐9 4/16/2020 2833.22 2765.02 1.60 1.60MW‐9 10/23/2020 2833.22 2765.49 1.60 1.60 MW‐9 4/07/21 2833.22 67.43 2765.79 1020 8.30 22.47 6.95 570.00 1.70 1.70 110 140.0 0.23 0.5 MW‐9 10/18/21 2833.22 66.73 2766.49 1000 8.57 20.29 6.20 590.00 1.80 1.80 110 140.0 0.26 0.4MW‐9 4/13/22 2833.22 66.35 2766.87 861 6.43 22.33 6.79 0.00 580 1.30 1.10 110 130 0.24 0.4 MW‐10 2/23/2012 2850.75 2773.95 2.80 2.80
MW‐10 5/17/2012 2850.75 2774.01 2.60 2.60

Page 6 of 7 ends

510
Cond. (uS/cm) pH              (pH Units)
TABLE 3
HISTORICAL GROUNDWATER QUALITY ANALYSIS
Adelanto Wastewater Treatment Plant
Adelanto, California
Sample ID Sample Date SWE (ft msl)
FIELD MEASUREMENTS LABORATORY ANALYSES
DTW
(ft)
E‐Water
(ft msl)
Chloride
(mg/L)
Sulfate
(mg/L) Boron  (mg/L) Fluoride       (mg/L) Temperature (oc) DO      (mg/L) TDS          (mg/L) Total Nitrogen  (mg/L) Nitrate as  Nitrogen  (mg/L) Turbidity      (NTU) MW‐10 8/15/2012 2850.75 2773.77 2.70 2.70MW‐10 11/15/2012 2850.75 2773.75 3.20 3.20MW‐10 2/13/2013 2850.75 2773.32 3.50 3.50MW‐10 5/16/2013 2850.75 2775.25 3.60 3.60MW‐10 7/11/2013 2850.75 2777.57 4.80 4.80MW‐10 4/18/2014 2850.75 2784.96 4.00 4.90MW‐10 4/17/2014 2850.75 2785.83 3.10 4.00MW‐10 4/15/2015 2850.75 2787.92 4.90 3.10MW‐10 10/22/2015 2850.75 2788.33 1.70 1.70MW‐10 4/14/2016 2850.75 2790.71 1.30 1.30MW‐10 10/13/2016 2850.75 2790.41 1.00 1.00MW‐10 4/14/2017 2850.75 2791.40 1.20 1.20MW‐10 10/12/2017 2850.75 2792.55 1.20 1.20MW‐10 4/19/2018 2850.75 2791.57 1.50 1.50MW‐10 10/18/2018 2850.75 2792.93 1.50 1.50MW‐10 4/11/2019 2850.75 2793.42 1.10 1.10MW‐10 10/17/2019 2850.75 2794.16 1.80 1.80 MW‐10 4/16/2020 2850.75 2794.01 1.40 1.40MW‐10 10/23/2020 2850.75 2794.45 1.30 1.30MW‐10 4/07/21 2850.75 55.60 2795.15 979 7.80 20.97 1.87 530.00 1.50 1.40 110 110.0 0.35 0.4MW‐10 10/18/21 2850.75 56.04 2794.71 943 8.66 19.14 1.93 570.00 2.00 2.00 100 120.0 0.33 0.4MW‐10 4/13/22 2850.75 55.93 2794.82 784 6.47 22.72 4.00 3.60 520 <1.6 1.50 110 110 0.18 0.4 SWE TDSDTW ftE‐Water  ft msl‐ Chemical  std unitsNS mg/lN/A J+ NTU Total Dissolved SolidsFeetFeet Mean Sea LevelStandard pH unitsMilligram per liter or parts per millionResult is above the MDL, but below the PQL; Value is approximate Survey Well Elevation
Notes:

Depth to WaterElevation of WaterNo MCL or California Secondary MCL for Drinking WaterNot Available / Not Accessible / No Sample CollectedRe‐sampled on alternate date due to lab holding time expiration for sample 10/18/2021.  Nephelometric Turbity Unit

Page 7 of 7 ends

511

APPENDIX A
512
Site Description
The subject site is located in the northern portion of the City of Adelanto, approximately 2,500 feet east of US Highway 395, northeast of the intersection of Auburn Avenue and Jonathan Street, in the County of San Bernardino. A site vicinity map is included as Figure 1. The Southern California Logistics Airport (former George Air Force Base) lies approximately, 0.5 miles due east of the site. The site lies at an elevation of approximately 2,842 feet above mean sea level. With the exception of the Shadow Mountain area north of Adelanto, topography across the area is relatively flat and featureless, sloping gently towards the north-northeast at an average gradient of approximately 25 feet per mile. The only surface water drainage of any observable significance is close proximity to the site is a desert wash that extends in a northwestsoutheast manner about 2,000 feet due west and 3,000 feet due south of the site. This drainage joins Fremont Wash approximately 3.5 miles northwest of the site, and from there finds confluence with the Mojave River near the own of Helendale, approximately 11 miles northeast of the site.

The facility began treating wastewater in 1998 with an initial design capacity of 1.5 MGD. Treated effluent is discharged into a series of excavated percolation ponds along the northern and central portions of the site. Since 1998, the amount of effluent required to be handled by the facility has risen significantly. Recent improvements to the facility have resulted in the significant increase in plant capacity to 3.0 MGD, and as of March 2013, the WWTP no longer bypasses excess wastewater to the Victor Valley Wastewater Reclamation Authority (VVWRA) treatment plant, but handles, treats, and disposes of all waste it receives onsite.

The facility includes ten (10) groundwater monitoring wells (MW-1A, MW-2 through MW-10) that are used to monitor groundwater conditions surrounding the facility.

Groundwater monitoring well locations are depicted on Figure 2.

Well installation activities were conducted in 1998 for wells MW-2 and MW-3, 2011 for wells MW-7, MW-8, and MW-9. Due to the extended screen length in existing well MW1, well MW-1A was installed as a replacement well for well MW-1 to provide a shallower screen depth that were more consistent with wells MW-2 through MW-10.

Current semi-annual groundwater monitoring and sampling only includes wells MW-1A, MW-2 through MW-10. The wells are sampled every April and October as outlined in the WDR permit. A summary of the completion detail is included as Table 1. 513
Geologic and Hydrogeologic Settings
The subject site is located in the high desert region of the Mojave Desert of southern California. The area is situated on a broad erosional plain of coalescing alluvial fans.

Geologic units Characteristic of alluvial fans include interbedded deposits of clastic sediments and eroded debris laid down in high energy fluvial systems such as braided stream channels and flood events typical of desert environments. Subsurface materials included interbedded layers of sands, silts, gravels and cobbles, and other varying mixtures. Clay layers, calcareous soils (cacliche), and evaporite deposits can occur but are generally of limited thickness and areal extent.

The subject site is part of the Mojave River Valley Groundwater Basin (which includes upper, middle and lower sub-basins), and are managed by the Mojave Water Agency.

Regional groundwater flow direction are to the north-northeast toward the Mojave River.

According to the California Department of Water Resources, there are two distinct waterbearing units present in the area of the subject site1 . The first is described as a Pleistocene
and younger floodplain unit (called the “Floodplain Unit”) that extends 50 to 200 feet deep in the Basin. The other is described as a Pliocene and younger fan unit (called the “Fan Unit”) that includes unconsolidated to partially consolidated alluvial fan deposits up to 1,000 feet thick. The available geologic information suggests that the site is primarily underlain by the Fan Unit.
1 California’s Groundwater, California Department of Water Resources Bulletin 118, update 2/27/2004, Upper Mojave River Valley Groundwater Basin.
514

APPENDIX B
515
AEEI JOB NO.: AWWTP Q222
DATE: 2022

GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELLS

WELL ID
DTW
(feet)
TOTAL
VOLUME
PURGED DTB DIA.

Screen
Interval
Milliliters (mL) Feet Inch Feet
CDTW
(feet)
SWE
(ft msl)
E-WAT (ft
msl)
MW-1A 40.06 10000 101.00 4.00 80-100 40.06 2844.46 2804.40 No Odor / Clear MW-2 35.00 10000 118.00 2.00 90-102 35.00 2839.83 2804.83 No Odor / Clear MW-3 43.80 10000 120.00 2.00 90-102 43.80 2846.24 2802.44 No Odor / Clear MW-4 51.70 10000 101.00 2.00 61-101 51.70 2849.28 2797.58 No Odor / Clear MW-5 63.72 10000 114.00 2.00 69-114 63.72 2858.89 2795.17 No Odor / Clear MW-6 42.41 10000 89.50 2.00 40-89.5 42.41 2833.24 2790.83 No Odor / Clear MW-7 58.81 10000 103.00 4.00 75-105 58.81 2842.57 2783.76 No Odor / Clear MW-8 45.00 10000 86.00 4.00 55-85 45.00 2833.60 2788.60 No Odor / Clear MW-9 66.35 10000 103.00 4.00 74-104 66.35 2833.22 2766.87 No Odor / Clear MW-10 55.93 10000 101.00 4.00 70-100 55.93 2850.75 2794.82 No Odor / Clear

E X P L A N A T I O N

DTW - DEPTH TO WATER FROM SURFACE DTP - DEPTH TO PRODUCT FROM SURFACE

MEASUREMENTS IN FEET DTB - DEPTH TO BOTTOM DIA - WELL DIAMETER CDTW - CORRECTED DEPTH TO WATER FOR PRESENCE OF FREE PRODUCT (USING SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF 0.755) NA - NOT AVAILABLE

SWE - SURVEYED WELL HEAD ELEVATION E-WAT - ELEVATION OF WATER

R E M A R K S
All purged water was discharged on the ground next to the well. Low flow sampling conducted.

GROUNDWATER REMOVED: 100000 mL
DATA RECORDED BY:KK ENTERED BY: JD
(714) 890 - 7129
April 13,
Semi-Annual
ELEVATION Notes

PROJECT STATUS REPORT
Adelanto Waste Water Treatment Plant
(AWWTP)
19101 Jonathan Street
Adelanto, California 92301

ATLAS ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING, INC.
5122 BOLSA AVENUE, SUITE 107
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526

PROCEDURE FOR LOW-FLOW (MINIMAL DRAWDOWN) PURGING AND SAMPLING Introduction
The Low-Flow purging and sampling technique is the preferred procedure for groundwater sampling under a wide range of hydrogeologic settings. The objective of low-flow/minimal drawdown purging is to obtain a sample that is most representative of the ambient groundwater conditions near the well, taking into consideration aquifer heterogeneities and site-specific subsurface conditions, without imparting bias due to excessive pump rates or formation stress.

The Low-Flow method of purging and sampling involves using a pump to purge water at a constant low rate to achieve field parameter stabilization, while minimizing stress on the aquifer. This method has been well documented as a preferred methodology for collecting representative samples from groundwater (Low-Flow (Minimal Drawdown), Ground-Water Sampling Procedures, Puls and Barcelona, USEPA, April 1996). LowFlow purging is considered by leading researchers as superior to bailing and high-rate pumping and results in a more representative sample than the typical “three volume” well purge methodology or well evacuation.

This procedure is accomplished by measuring field parameters at periodic intervals during purging with a flow cell container. The flow cell is an inline purge cell, which will allow the sample technician to constantly monitor field water quality parameters such as temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, and conductivity. Other techniques or containers can be used to collect samples for periodic measurements, provided that periodic and representative samples can be collected.

The following sections provide a general discussion on each aspect of the Low-Flow procedure with bulleted items being procedural steps.

Equipment
Dedicated pumps are ideal for low flow purging. Sites that have observation wells without dedicated pumps will require the use of portable (non-dedicated) pumps (bailers cannot to be used for low-flow purging). The sampling team should have all equipment necessary for purging and sampling wells at low flow rates. Other equipment may include:
o Water Level Tape or other water level measuring device; o Flow cell to monitor field parameters;
o Calibrated purge water container;
o Dedicated pump system or disposable sample tubing (for non-dedicated pumps); and
o Field Meters for pH, Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen, and Conductivity/Specific Conductance.

Prior to each sampling event the field probes will be calibrated in accordance with the owner’s manual provided and the site-specific sampling plan. Field probes should be checked for drift every four hours or at the end of the day at a minimum. 527

PROCEDURE FOR LOW-FLOW (MINIMAL DRAWDOWN) PURGE AND SAMPLING 1 It is important to identify the range, resolution and accuracy of the instruments used to determine if the selected stabilization criteria can be measured. If the instruments available cannot accurately measure the stabilization criteria above, consult with the regulatory program manager to determine if different criteria values would be appropriate for your sampling program.

Decontamination
Sites that have observation wells without dedicated pumps will require the use of nondedicated pumps. All non-dedicated equipment used during the purging and sampling process must be decontaminated prior to each use, including tubing, unless it is disposable):
o Downhole equipment, such as a water level indicator, is to be triple-rinsed between well locations.
o Discard disposable polyethylene tubing used with non dedicated pumps after use at each well.

Sample bottles will be provided and properly prepared by the analytical laboratory scheduled to perform the analysis. No cleaning or preparation of sampling bottles by field personal will be performed.

Purge Volumes and Monitoring Frequency
Low-flow purging does not require the calculation of the water volume in the well, since purging is based solely on indicator parameter stabilization. Rather, the volume of the pump and discharge tubing are necessary for making calculations needed to determine field measurement frequency and/or the minimum purge (“passive”) sampling system purge volume. Pump chamber or bladder volumes can be obtained from the manufacturer. Volumes of the sample tubing can be calculated or taken from the table below.

Discharge Tubing Volumes
Tubing Diameter Volume/foot
1/2" OD/3/8” ID 20 ml
3/8” OD/1/4” ID 10 ml
1/4" OD/1/8” ID 5 ml
Well casing volumes should only be calculated if required by Permit or State Regulation and recorded on field information forms. In addition, well casing volumes may be needed in any case where parameter stabilization is not achieved after a three-casingvolume purge (see below).

Sampling equipment volumes are calculated or recorded for use in determining the frequency of field measurements. Depending on the equipment configuration, calculate and record the volume of the pump and sample tubing using the methodology described 528

PROCEDURE FOR LOW-FLOW (MINIMAL DRAWDOWN) PURGE AND SAMPLING 2 above (the volumes are typically converted to liters). The frequency of field readings is based on the time required to purge at least one volume of the pump and tubing system. For example, a pump and tubing volume of 500-ml purged at a rate of 250 ml/minute will be purged in two minutes; readings should be at least two minutes apart.

In any case, it is important to ensure that the field parameters are measured on independent samples of water.

Purge Rates
The objective of the purging process is to remove sufficient water from within the well screen zone to result in a sample that is representative of actual aquifer conditions adjacent to the well. The sampling pump or pump intake should be located within the well screen. This pump location is already established for dedicated pumps. For nondedicated pumps, the intake is placed within the screened interval, typically in the center of the screen. If the water column in the screen is shorter than the overall screen length, the pump should be placed lower in the screen but no lower than about 6-12 inches from the bottom of the screen to avoid picking up any settled solids in the well.

A low pumping rate (typically less than 1,000 ml/min) is used to minimize drawdown within the well and formation and mobilization of formation solids. Lower flow rates may be required during sampling. Flow rate is determined by measuring the time it takes to fill a calibrated container, or by measuring the volume of one pump discharge cycle and multiplying this volume by the number of cycles per minute (e.g., 125 ml/cycle x 4 CPM = 500 ml/min). Drawdown is monitored by measuring the water level below the top of the well casing with a water level indicator or similar device (e.g. transducer) while pumping. Drawdown will be stabilized during purging. Flow rates and drawdown are recorded on a field log, field data form or with a data logger. o Measure water levels prior to initiating purging;
o Calculate well volumes, if required by permit;
o Calculate sampling system volume and determine indicator parameter measurement frequency;
o Lower water level meter probe to 1-2 feet below static water level; o Connect the flow cell to the discharge tube from the pump; o Begin purge at a rate of 100-200 ml/min (or at a rate determined from prior events);
o Check drawdown with a water level tape while pumping; o If drawdown stabilizes quickly, increase the pumping rate in increments of 100 ml/min until drawdown increases, then reduce the rate slightly after a few minutes to achieve a stable pumping water level;
o If the water level continues to drop, reduce purge rate by 100 ml/min increments until the water level stabilizes;
o Once water level stabilization is achieved, proceed to indicator parameter stabilization.
529

PROCEDURE FOR LOW-FLOW (MINIMAL DRAWDOWN) PURGE AND SAMPLING 3 Parameter Stabilization
Parameter stabilization ensures that the well is adequately purged and sampled groundwater is representative of formation water. In order to determine when a well has been adequately purged, samplers should:
o Monitor pH, specific conductance, and dissolved oxygen of the ground water removed during purging;
o Observe and record the water level drawdown; and
o Record the purge rate and note the volume of water removed if required by guidance or permit.

A well is adequately purged when the pH, specific conductance, and dissolved oxygen stabilize. Stabilization occurs as follows:
pH: +/- 0.2 pH units
Conductance: +/- 5 % of reading value
Dissolved oxygen: +/- 10.0% or 0.2 mg/L, whichever is greater.

Temperature is not a reliable indicator of stabilization, being affected by ambient temperature at the well head, sunlight, and some sampling devices such as electric pumps. Temperature is typically measured to provide correction for temperature dependent parameters (e.g., DO % saturation, pH, and specific conductance).

While turbidity is not a direct measurement of water chemistry and is not used as an indicator parameter of stabilization, it is useful to support data from metals analyses. To avoid artifacts in sample analysis, turbidity should be as low as possible when samples are taken. Turbidity should be measured at least three times, once when purging is initiated, again after the water level in the well stabilizes, and again when the water chemistry indicator parameters being measured are stable. Turbidity should also be measured any time the pumping rate is increased or the water level in the well drops noticeably. If the initial turbidity reading is high (>50 NTU) and the second reading is not significantly lower, the pump rate should be reduced. The turbidity value measured prior to sampling will be recorded. If this value exceeds 50 NTU, procedures should be reviewed and the source of the elevated turbidity determined.

Sampling
Wells should be sampled immediately upon completion of purging operations. Once the water level stabilizes, the purge rate should remain constant during low-flow sampling (generally less than 500 ml/min). For VOCs, lower sampling rates (100 - 200 milliliters/minute) may be required.
o Record field parameters prior to sampling;
o Record depth to water levels prior to sampling (note if the well has not stabilized). 530

PROCEDURE FOR LOW-FLOW (MINIMAL DRAWDOWN) PURGE AND SAMPLING 4 o Record the flow rate determined using a calibrated measuring device; o Disconnect the flow cell other equipment from the pump discharge tube; o Collect samples from the pump discharge tube
o Collect large volume samples first (e.g.,1 liter bottles), then VOC samples, and any filtered samples last;
If, after three well volumes have been removed, the chemical parameters have not stabilized according to the above criteria, the sampling team may elect to collect a sample. The conditions of sampling should be noted in the field log or field information form.

Low Yield Formations
In some situations, even with very slow purge rates, the well drawdown may not stabilize. In this case, sampling the water within the well screen zone provides the best opportunity to determine the formation water chemistry, as well evacuation can greatly affect sample chemistry through changes in dissolved gas levels, dissolved metals and VOCs.

Attempts should be made to avoid purging wells to dryness. This can usually be accomplished by slowing the purge rate. If the well is evacuated during the purging procedures shown above, the sample may be collected as soon as a sufficient volume of water has recovered in the well. If the well goes dry repeatedly (i.e. over multiple monitoring events) prior to sampling, then a minimum purge or “passive” sampling approach should be used in lieu of well evacuation.

Minimum Purge (“Passive”) Sampling
For wells that cannot achieve a stabilized water level and purge dry even at very low pumping rates, an alternative to the traditional evacuation approach is to use minimum purge (sometimes called “passive”) sampling techniques to avoid the pitfalls of well evacuation and obtain a better estimation of the formation water quality. Sampling the water present in the screen zone provides the greatest chance of obtaining samples with minimal alteration of the chemistry. Although the low movement rate of the ground water in the screen provides only a limited exchange, avoiding the alteration caused by the factors mentioned above is really the best alternative.

The minimum purge approach requires the removal of the smallest possible purge volume prior to sampling, generally limited to the volume of the sampling system. The sampling system volume is minimized by using very small diameter tubing and the smallest possible pump chamber volume. Plastic tubing should have sufficient wall thickness to minimize the potential for oxygen transfer through the tubing when pumping at very low flow rates. After purging 1-3 volumes of the sampling system, samples are taken from the subsequent water pumped. Since minimum purge sampling requires the minimum possible disturbance to the water column and surrounding formation, dedicated sampling systems are required for this approach. 531

PROCEDURE FOR LOW-FLOW (MINIMAL DRAWDOWN) PURGE AND SAMPLING 5 The pumping rates used for minimum purge sampling are much lower than for low-flow purging, generally 100 ml/minute or less. Drawdown is expected, since it cannot be avoided; however, it is still advisable to pump at the lowest possible rate to limit drawdown to the minimum possible. Monitoring indicator parameters for stability is not part of this approach, since the intention is not to purge until stabilization of these measurements. The pH, specific conductance and turbidity or any other required field parameters should be measured during collection of the sample from the recovered volume. Regulatory approval should be obtained prior to collecting a sample using this method.

Field Records
Field information must be recorded during purging and sampling. At a minimum, the following information should be included in the field forms for each groundwater monitoring well.
o Purge Information (pumping rate, purge volume if required); o Equipment Specifications (pump type, filter type and pore size if used); o Well Data (depth to water, total depth, groundwater elevation); o Field Measurements during purging and at the time of sample collection; and o General weather conditions or other comments
This data is to be recorded on field forms and/or in a data logger.

Other Technical Issues
The following are other technical issues addressed as follows by the facility:
o Dedicated pump intakes are generally set at the middle of the screen. Where water levels have dropped due to drought conditions, the sampling team may lower the pump in order to obtain sufficient sample.
o For wells installed in bedrock, packers are only required to seal off the zone of interest if the bedrock has been determined to be competent (e.g. is not highly fractured).
o The flow cell system does not require decontamination between wells, because the act of purging removes any liquids from other wells and because sampling takes place upstream of the flow cell and only after disconnecting the pump discharge tubing.
532

APPENDIX C
533
BZ‐01 4/07/22 2840.92 62.51 2778.41 111.95 ‐ 131.95 4.00 Sch 40 PVC SWE
DTW
E‐Water
ft Feet
ft msl
GROUNDWATER GAUGING SUMMARY
Former George Air Force Base
Adelanto, California
Sample ID Sample Date SWE
(ft msl)
DTW
(ft)
E‐Water
(ft msl)
Screen Interval
(ft bgs)
Casing Diameter
(Inches) Casing Material
Notes:

Survey Well Elevation
Depth to Water
Elevation of Water
Feet Mean Sea Level

Page 1 of 1 ends

534

APPENDIX D FIGURES
535
Client Name:

Report Date:

PERC Water Corp
19101 Jonathan St.

Dave Kachelski
Adelanto, CA 92301
Contact:

Address: Project Number:

Analytical Report: Page 1 of 18
Project Name:
12-May-2022
Work Order Number: C2D1503
Received on Ice (Y/N): Yes Temp: 3 °C
PERC - Semi-Annual MW
AWWTP - Q222
C2D1503
Attached is the analytical report for the sample(s) received for your project. Below is a list of the individual sample descriptions with the corresponding laboratory number(s). Also, enclosed is a copy of the Chain of Custody document (if received with your sample(s)). Please note any unused portion of the sample(s) may be responsibly discarded after 30 days from the above report date, unless you have requested otherwise.

Thank you for the opportunity to serve your analytical needs. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this report please contact our client service department.

Sample Identification
Lab Sample # Client Sample ID Matrix Date Sampled By Date Submitted By C2D1503-01 Liquid 04/13/22 11:00 Client Courier (Lisa
P.) - DE
MW-1A 04/13/22 13:07
C2D1503-02 Liquid 04/13/22 11:30 Client Courier (Lisa
P.) - DE
MW-2 04/13/22 13:07
C2D1503-03 Liquid 04/13/22 11:50 Client Courier (Lisa
P.) - DE
MW-3 04/13/22 13:07
C2D1503-04 Liquid 04/13/22 6:45 Client Courier (Lisa
P.) - DE
MW-4 04/13/22 13:07
C2D1503-05 Liquid 04/13/22 7:10 Client Courier (Lisa
P.) - DE
MW-5 04/13/22 13:07
C2D1503-06 Liquid 04/13/22 7:55 Client Courier (Lisa
P.) - DE
MW-6 04/13/22 13:07
C2D1503-07 Liquid 04/13/22 9:15 Client Courier (Lisa
P.) - DE
MW-7 04/13/22 13:07
C2D1503-08 Liquid 04/13/22 7:35 Client Courier (Lisa
P.) - DE
MW-8 04/13/22 13:07
C2D1503-09 Liquid 04/13/22 8:30 Client Courier (Lisa
P.) - DE
MW-9 04/13/22 13:07
C2D1503-10 Liquid 04/13/22 10:30 Client Courier (Lisa
P.) - DE
MW-10 04/13/22 13:07
mailing
P.O. Box 432
Riverside, CA 92502-0432
CA ELAP No. 2698
EPA No. CA00102
NELAP No. OR4035
LACSD No. 10119
P (951) 653-3351
F (951) 653-1662
www.babcocklabs.com
location
6100 Quail Valley Court
Riverside, CA 92507-0704
536
Client Name:

Report Date:

PERC Water Corp
19101 Jonathan St.

Dave Kachelski
Adelanto, CA 92301
Contact:

Address: Project Number:

Analytical Report: Page 2 of 18
Project Name:
12-May-2022
Work Order Number: C2D1503
Received on Ice (Y/N): Yes Temp: 3 °C
PERC - Semi-Annual MW
AWWTP - Q222
C2D1503
Laboratory Reference Number
Sample Description
04/13/22 11:00
Sampled Date/Time Received Date/Time
04/13/22 13:07
Matrix
MW-1A Liquid
C2D1503-01
Analyte(s) Result RDL MDL Units Method Analysis Date Analyst Flag Anions
Chloride 110 1.0 0.30 mg/L EPA 300.0 04/14/22 08:19 DNF Sulfate 96 0.50 0.23 mg/L EPA 300.0 04/14/22 08:19 DNF
Nitrate as N 0.43 0.20 0.16 mg/L EPA 300.0 04/14/22 08:19 DNF Fluoride 0.5 0.1 0.02 mg/L SM 4500F C 04/25/22 13:02 ALD Nitrite as N ND 0.1 0.09 mg/L EPA 300.0 04/14/22 08:19 DNF Solids
Total Dissolved Solids 470 10 10 mg/L SM 2540C 04/19/22 22:18 AMB Nutrients
Kjeldahl Nitrogen 0.2 0.1 0.09 mg/L EPA 351.2 05/03/22 14:26 BAA Total Nitrogen 0.59 0.40 mg/L Calculation
Metals and Metalloids
Boron 0.70 0.20 0.067 mg/L EPA 200.7 04/26/22 18:46 HRL mailing
P.O. Box 432
Riverside, CA 92502-0432
CA ELAP No. 2698
EPA No. CA00102
NELAP No. OR4035
LACSD No. 10119
P (951) 653-3351
F (951) 653-1662
www.babcocklabs.com
location
6100 Quail Valley Court
Riverside, CA 92507-0704
537
Client Name:

Report Date:

PERC Water Corp
19101 Jonathan St.

Dave Kachelski
Adelanto, CA 92301
Contact:

Address: Project Number:

Analytical Report: Page 3 of 18
Project Name:
12-May-2022
Work Order Number: C2D1503
Received on Ice (Y/N): Yes Temp: 3 °C
PERC - Semi-Annual MW
AWWTP - Q222
C2D1503
Laboratory Reference Number
Sample Description
04/13/22 11:30
Sampled Date/Time Received Date/Time
04/13/22 13:07
Matrix
MW-2 Liquid
C2D1503-02
Analyte(s) Result RDL MDL Units Method Analysis Date Analyst Flag Anions
Chloride 100 1.0 0.30 mg/L EPA 300.0 04/14/22 08:38 DNF Sulfate 100 0.50 0.23 mg/L EPA 300.0 04/14/22 08:38 DNF Nitrate as N 1.1 0.20 0.16 mg/L EPA 300.0 04/14/22 08:38 DNF Fluoride 0.7 0.1 0.02 mg/L SM 4500F C 04/25/22 13:02 ALD Nitrite as N ND 0.1 0.09 mg/L EPA 300.0 04/14/22 08:38 DNF Solids
Total Dissolved Solids 520 10 10 mg/L SM 2540C 04/19/22 22:18 AMB Nutrients
Kjeldahl Nitrogen 0.9 0.1 0.09 mg/L EPA 351.2 05/03/22 14:30 BAA Total Nitrogen 2.1 0.40 mg/L Calculation
Metals and Metalloids
Boron 0.73 0.20 0.067 mg/L EPA 200.7 04/26/22 18:48 HRL mailing
P.O. Box 432
Riverside, CA 92502-0432
CA ELAP No. 2698
EPA No. CA00102
NELAP No. OR4035
LACSD No. 10119
P (951) 653-3351
F (951) 653-1662
www.babcocklabs.com
location
6100 Quail Valley Court
Riverside, CA 92507-0704
538
Client Name:

Report Date:

PERC Water Corp
19101 Jonathan St.

Dave Kachelski
Adelanto, CA 92301
Contact:

Address: Project Number:

Analytical Report: Page 4 of 18
Project Name:
12-May-2022
Work Order Number: C2D1503
Received on Ice (Y/N): Yes Temp: 3 °C
PERC - Semi-Annual MW
AWWTP - Q222
C2D1503
Laboratory Reference Number
Sample Description
04/13/22 11:50
Sampled Date/Time Received Date/Time
04/13/22 13:07
Matrix
MW-3 Liquid
C2D1503-03
Analyte(s) Result RDL MDL Units Method Analysis Date Analyst Flag Anions
Chloride 100 1.0 0.30 mg/L EPA 300.0 04/14/22 08:54 DNF Sulfate 110 0.50 0.23 mg/L EPA 300.0 04/14/22 08:54 DNF Nitrate as N 0.47 0.20 0.16 mg/L EPA 300.0 04/14/22 08:54 DNF Fluoride 0.4 0.1 0.02 mg/L SM 4500F C 04/25/22 13:02 ALD Nitrite as N ND 0.1 0.09 mg/L EPA 300.0 04/14/22 08:54 DNF Solids
Total Dissolved Solids 510 10 10 mg/L SM 2540C 04/19/22 22:18 AMB Nutrients
Kjeldahl Nitrogen ND 0.1 0.09 mg/L EPA 351.2 05/03/22 14:32 BAA Total Nitrogen 0.47 0.40 mg/L Calculation
Metals and Metalloids
Boron 0.26 0.10 0.033 mg/L EPA 200.7 04/26/22 18:50 HRL mailing
P.O. Box 432
Riverside, CA 92502-0432
CA ELAP No. 2698
EPA No. CA00102
NELAP No. OR4035
LACSD No. 10119
P (951) 653-3351
F (951) 653-1662
www.babcocklabs.com
location
6100 Quail Valley Court
Riverside, CA 92507-0704
539
Client Name:

Report Date:

PERC Water Corp
19101 Jonathan St.

Dave Kachelski
Adelanto, CA 92301
Contact:

Address: Project Number:

Analytical Report: Page 5 of 18
Project Name:
12-May-2022
Work Order Number: C2D1503
Received on Ice (Y/N): Yes Temp: 3 °C
PERC - Semi-Annual MW
AWWTP - Q222
C2D1503
Laboratory Reference Number
Sample Description
04/13/22 06:45
Sampled Date/Time Received Date/Time
04/13/22 13:07
Matrix
MW-4 Liquid
C2D1503-04
Analyte(s) Result RDL MDL Units Method Analysis Date Analyst Flag Anions
Chloride 96 1.0 0.30 mg/L EPA 300.0 04/14/22 09:10 DNF
Sulfate 110 0.50 0.23 mg/L EPA 300.0 04/14/22 09:10 DNF Nitrate as N 1.9 0.20 0.16 mg/L EPA 300.0 04/14/22 09:10 DNF Fluoride 0.5 0.1 0.02 mg/L SM 4500F C 04/25/22 13:02 ALD Nitrite as N ND 0.1 0.09 mg/L EPA 300.0 04/14/22 09:10 DNF Solids
Total Dissolved Solids 500 10 10 mg/L SM 2540C 04/19/22 22:18 AMB Nutrients
Kjeldahl Nitrogen ND 0.1 0.09 mg/L EPA 351.2 05/03/22 14:33 BAA Total Nitrogen 1.9 0.40 mg/L Calculation
Metals and Metalloids
Boron 0.15 0.10 0.033 mg/L EPA 200.7 04/26/22 18:52 HRL mailing
P.O. Box 432
Riverside, CA 92502-0432
CA ELAP No. 2698
EPA No. CA00102
NELAP No. OR4035
LACSD No. 10119
P (951) 653-3351
F (951) 653-1662
www.babcocklabs.com
location
6100 Quail Valley Court
Riverside, CA 92507-0704
540
Client Name:

Report Date:

PERC Water Corp
19101 Jonathan St.

Dave Kachelski
Adelanto, CA 92301
Contact:

Address: Project Number:

Analytical Report: Page 6 of 18
Project Name:
12-May-2022
Work Order Number: C2D1503
Received on Ice (Y/N): Yes Temp: 3 °C
PERC - Semi-Annual MW
AWWTP - Q222
C2D1503
Laboratory Reference Number
Sample Description
04/13/22 07:10
Sampled Date/Time Received Date/Time
04/13/22 13:07
Matrix
MW-5 Liquid
C2D1503-05
Analyte(s) Result RDL MDL Units Method Analysis Date Analyst Flag Anions
Chloride 84 1.0 0.30 mg/L EPA 300.0 04/14/22 09:26 DNF
Sulfate 110 0.50 0.23 mg/L EPA 300.0 04/14/22 09:26 DNF Nitrate as N 3.3 0.20 0.16 mg/L EPA 300.0 04/14/22 09:26 DNF Fluoride 0.5 0.1 0.02 mg/L SM 4500F C 04/25/22 13:02 ALD Nitrite as N ND 0.1 0.09 mg/L EPA 300.0 04/14/22 09:26 DNF Solids
Total Dissolved Solids 470 10 10 mg/L SM 2540C 04/19/22 22:18 AMB Nutrients
Kjeldahl Nitrogen ND 0.1 0.09 mg/L EPA 351.2 05/03/22 14:35 BAA Total Nitrogen 3.3 0.40 mg/L Calculation
Metals and Metalloids
Boron 0.054 0.10 0.033 mg/L EPA 200.7 04/26/22 18:54 HRL J mailing
P.O. Box 432
Riverside, CA 92502-0432
CA ELAP No. 2698
EPA No. CA00102
NELAP No. OR4035
LACSD No. 10119
P (951) 653-3351
F (951) 653-1662
www.babcocklabs.com
location
6100 Quail Valley Court
Riverside, CA 92507-0704
541
Client Name:

Report Date:

PERC Water Corp
19101 Jonathan St.

Dave Kachelski
Adelanto, CA 92301
Contact:

Address: Project Number:

Analytical Report: Page 7 of 18
Project Name:
12-May-2022
Work Order Number: C2D1503
Received on Ice (Y/N): Yes Temp: 3 °C
PERC - Semi-Annual MW
AWWTP - Q222
C2D1503
Laboratory Reference Number
Sample Description
04/13/22 07:55
Sampled Date/Time Received Date/Time
04/13/22 13:07
Matrix
MW-6 Liquid
C2D1503-06
Analyte(s) Result RDL MDL Units Method Analysis Date Analyst Flag Anions
Chloride 100 1.0 0.30 mg/L EPA 300.0 04/14/22 09:42 DNF Sulfate 100 0.50 0.23 mg/L EPA 300.0 04/14/22 09:42 DNF Nitrate as N 0.37 0.20 0.16 mg/L EPA 300.0 04/14/22 09:42 DNF Fluoride 0.6 0.1 0.02 mg/L SM 4500F C 04/25/22 13:02 ALD Nitrite as N ND 0.1 0.09 mg/L EPA 300.0 04/14/22 09:42 DNF Solids
Total Dissolved Solids 520 10 10 mg/L SM 2540C 04/19/22 22:18 AMB Nutrients
Kjeldahl Nitrogen 0.1 0.1 0.09 mg/L EPA 351.2 05/03/22 14:36 BAA Total Nitrogen 0.48 0.40 mg/L Calculation
Metals and Metalloids
Boron 0.35 0.10 0.033 mg/L EPA 200.7 04/26/22 18:56 HRL mailing
P.O. Box 432
Riverside, CA 92502-0432
CA ELAP No. 2698
EPA No. CA00102
NELAP No. OR4035
LACSD No. 10119
P (951) 653-3351
F (951) 653-1662
www.babcocklabs.com
location
6100 Quail Valley Court
Riverside, CA 92507-0704
542
Client Name:

Report Date:

PERC Water Corp
19101 Jonathan St.

Dave Kachelski
Adelanto, CA 92301
Contact:

Address: Project Number:

Analytical Report: Page 8 of 18
Project Name:
12-May-2022
Work Order Number: C2D1503
Received on Ice (Y/N): Yes Temp: 3 °C
PERC - Semi-Annual MW
AWWTP - Q222
C2D1503
Laboratory Reference Number
Sample Description
04/13/22 09:15
Sampled Date/Time Received Date/Time
04/13/22 13:07
Matrix
MW-7 Liquid
C2D1503-07
Analyte(s) Result RDL MDL Units Method Analysis Date Analyst Flag Anions
Chloride 100 1.0 0.30 mg/L EPA 300.0 04/14/22 09:59 DNF Sulfate 110 0.50 0.23 mg/L EPA 300.0 04/14/22 09:59 DNF Nitrate as N 0.87 0.20 0.16 mg/L EPA 300.0 04/14/22 09:59 DNF Fluoride 0.4 0.1 0.02 mg/L SM 4500F C 04/25/22 13:02 ALD Nitrite as N ND 0.1 0.09 mg/L EPA 300.0 04/14/22 09:59 DNF Solids
Total Dissolved Solids 540 10 10 mg/L SM 2540C 04/19/22 22:18 AMB Nutrients
Kjeldahl Nitrogen ND 0.1 0.09 mg/L EPA 351.2 05/03/22 14:37 BAA Total Nitrogen 0.87 0.40 mg/L Calculation
Metals and Metalloids
Boron 0.25 0.10 0.033 mg/L EPA 200.7 04/26/22 18:58 HRL mailing
P.O. Box 432
Riverside, CA 92502-0432
CA ELAP No. 2698
EPA No. CA00102
NELAP No. OR4035
LACSD No. 10119
P (951) 653-3351
F (951) 653-1662
www.babcocklabs.com
location
6100 Quail Valley Court
Riverside, CA 92507-0704
543
Client Name:

Report Date:

PERC Water Corp
19101 Jonathan St.

Dave Kachelski
Adelanto, CA 92301
Contact:

Address: Project Number:

Analytical Report: Page 9 of 18
Project Name:
12-May-2022
Work Order Number: C2D1503
Received on Ice (Y/N): Yes Temp: 3 °C
PERC - Semi-Annual MW
AWWTP - Q222
C2D1503
Laboratory Reference Number
Sample Description
04/13/22 07:35
Sampled Date/Time Received Date/Time
04/13/22 13:07
Matrix
MW-8 Liquid
C2D1503-08
Analyte(s) Result RDL MDL Units Method Analysis Date Analyst Flag Anions
Chloride 110 1.0 0.30 mg/L EPA 300.0 04/14/22 10:15 DNF Sulfate 110 0.50 0.23 mg/L EPA 300.0 04/14/22 10:15 DNF Nitrate as N 0.48 0.20 0.16 mg/L EPA 300.0 04/14/22 10:15 DNF Fluoride 0.5 0.1 0.02 mg/L SM 4500F C 04/25/22 13:02 ALD Nitrite as N 0.1 0.1 0.09 mg/L EPA 300.0 04/14/22 10:15 DNF Solids
Total Dissolved Solids 560 10 10 mg/L SM 2540C 04/19/22 22:18 AMB Nutrients
Kjeldahl Nitrogen 0.1 0.1 0.09 mg/L EPA 351.2 05/03/22 14:39 BAA Total Nitrogen 0.70 0.40 mg/L Calculation
Metals and Metalloids
Boron 0.33 0.10 0.033 mg/L EPA 200.7 04/26/22 19:00 HRL mailing
P.O. Box 432
Riverside, CA 92502-0432
CA ELAP No. 2698
EPA No. CA00102
NELAP No. OR4035
LACSD No. 10119
P (951) 653-3351
F (951) 653-1662
www.babcocklabs.com
location
6100 Quail Valley Court
Riverside, CA 92507-0704
544
Client Name:

Report Date:

PERC Water Corp
19101 Jonathan St.

Dave Kachelski
Adelanto, CA 92301
Contact:

Address: Project Number:

Analytical Report: Page 10 of 18
Project Name:
12-May-2022
Work Order Number: C2D1503
Received on Ice (Y/N): Yes Temp: 3 °C
PERC - Semi-Annual MW
AWWTP - Q222
C2D1503
Laboratory Reference Number
Sample Description
04/13/22 08:30
Sampled Date/Time Received Date/Time
04/13/22 13:07
Matrix
MW-9 Liquid
C2D1503-09
Analyte(s) Result RDL MDL Units Method Analysis Date Analyst Flag Anions
Chloride 110 1.0 0.30 mg/L EPA 300.0 04/14/22 10:31 DNF Sulfate 130 0.50 0.23 mg/L EPA 300.0 04/14/22 10:31 DNF Nitrate as N 1.1 0.20 0.16 mg/L EPA 300.0 04/14/22 10:31 DNF Fluoride 0.4 0.1 0.02 mg/L SM 4500F C 04/25/22 13:02 ALD Nitrite as N 0.2 0.1 0.09 mg/L EPA 300.0 04/14/22 10:31 DNF Solids
Total Dissolved Solids 580 10 10 mg/L SM 2540C 04/19/22 22:18 AMB Nutrients
Kjeldahl Nitrogen ND 0.1 0.09 mg/L EPA 351.2 05/03/22 14:40 BAA Total Nitrogen 1.3 0.40 mg/L Calculation
Metals and Metalloids
Boron 0.24 0.10 0.033 mg/L EPA 200.7 04/26/22 19:31 HRL mailing
P.O. Box 432
Riverside, CA 92502-0432
CA ELAP No. 2698
EPA No. CA00102
NELAP No. OR4035
LACSD No. 10119
P (951) 653-3351
F (951) 653-1662
www.babcocklabs.com
location
6100 Quail Valley Court
Riverside, CA 92507-0704
545
Client Name:

Report Date:

PERC Water Corp
19101 Jonathan St.

Dave Kachelski
Adelanto, CA 92301
Contact:

Address: Project Number:

Analytical Report: Page 11 of 18
Project Name:
12-May-2022
Work Order Number: C2D1503
Received on Ice (Y/N): Yes Temp: 3 °C
PERC - Semi-Annual MW
AWWTP - Q222
C2D1503
Laboratory Reference Number
Sample Description
04/13/22 10:30
Sampled Date/Time Received Date/Time
04/13/22 13:07
Matrix
MW-10 Liquid
C2D1503-10
Analyte(s) Result RDL MDL Units Method Analysis Date Analyst Flag Anions
Chloride 110 5.0 1.5 mg/L EPA 300.0 04/14/22 10:47 DNF
Sulfate 110 2.5 1.2 mg/L EPA 300.0 04/14/22 10:47 DNF
Nitrate as N 1.5 1.0 0.78 mg/L EPA 300.0 04/14/22 10:47 DNF Fluoride 0.4 0.1 0.02 mg/L SM 4500F C 04/25/22 13:02 ALD Nitrite as N ND 0.5 0.5 mg/L EPA 300.0 04/14/22 10:47 DNF N_RLd Solids
Total Dissolved Solids 520 10 10 mg/L SM 2540C 04/19/22 22:18 AMB Nutrients
Kjeldahl Nitrogen ND 0.1 0.09 mg/L EPA 351.2 05/03/22 14:42 BAA Total Nitrogen ND 1.6 mg/L Calculation
Metals and Metalloids
Boron 0.18 0.10 0.033 mg/L EPA 200.7 04/26/22 19:33 HRL mailing
P.O. Box 432
Riverside, CA 92502-0432
CA ELAP No. 2698
EPA No. CA00102
NELAP No. OR4035
LACSD No. 10119
P (951) 653-3351
F (951) 653-1662
www.babcocklabs.com
location
6100 Quail Valley Court
Riverside, CA 92507-0704
546
Client Name:

Report Date:

PERC Water Corp
19101 Jonathan St.

Dave Kachelski
Adelanto, CA 92301
Contact:

Address: Project Number:

Analytical Report: Page 12 of 18
Project Name:
12-May-2022
Work Order Number: C2D1503
Received on Ice (Y/N): Yes Temp: 3 °C
PERC - Semi-Annual MW
AWWTP - Q222
C2D1503
Result RDL Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Analyte(s) Limit Flag
Anions - Batch Quality Control
Batch 2D13068 - Analyzed as Received IC
Blank (2D13068-BLK1) Prepared & Analyzed: 04/14/22
Nitrite as N ND 0.1 0.09 mg/L
Sulfate ND 0.50 0.23 mg/L
Chloride ND 1.0 0.30 mg/L
Nitrate as N ND 0.20 0.16 mg/L
LCS (2D13068-BS1) Prepared & Analyzed: 04/14/22
Nitrite as N 2.34 0.1 0.09 mg/L 2.50 94 90-110
Sulfate 23.7 0.50 0.23 mg/L 25.0 95 90-110
Chloride 24.3 1.0 0.30 mg/L 25.0 97 90-110
Nitrate as N 5.32 0.20 0.16 mg/L 5.65 94 90-110
Matrix Spike (2D13068-MS1) Source: C2D1469-01 Prepared & Analyzed: 04/14/22 Nitrite as N 2.47 0.1 0.09 mg/L 2.50 0.136 93 80-120
Sulfate 98.5 0.50 0.23 mg/L 25.0 73.9 99 75-128
Chloride 115 1.0 0.30 mg/L 25.0 90.2 100 84-129
Nitrate as N 10.1 0.20 0.16 mg/L 5.65 4.20 104 75-131
Matrix Spike (2D13068-MS2) Source: C2D1477-01 Prepared & Analyzed: 04/14/22 Nitrite as N 2.41 0.1 0.09 mg/L 2.50 0.114 92 80-120
Sulfate 81.6 0.50 0.23 mg/L 25.0 56.8 99 75-128
Chloride 118 1.0 0.30 mg/L 25.0 93.9 98 84-129
Nitrate as N 46.4 0.20 0.16 mg/L 5.65 40.8 98 75-131
Matrix Spike Dup (2D13068-MSD1) Source: C2D1469-01 Prepared & Analyzed: 04/14/22 Nitrite as N 2.41 0.1 0.09 mg/L 2.50 0.136 91 80-120 2 20 Sulfate 98.2 0.50 0.23 mg/L 25.0 73.9 97 75-128 0.3 20
Chloride 115 1.0 0.30 mg/L 25.0 90.2 100 84-129 0.1 20
Nitrate as N 10.0 0.20 0.16 mg/L 5.65 4.20 103 75-131 0.9 20 mailing
P.O. Box 432
Riverside, CA 92502-0432
CA ELAP No. 2698
EPA No. CA00102
NELAP No. OR4035
LACSD No. 10119
P (951) 653-3351
F (951) 653-1662
www.babcocklabs.com
location
6100 Quail Valley Court
Riverside, CA 92507-0704
547
Client Name:

Report Date:

PERC Water Corp
19101 Jonathan St.

Dave Kachelski
Adelanto, CA 92301
Contact:

Address: Project Number:

Analytical Report: Page 13 of 18
Project Name:
12-May-2022
Work Order Number: C2D1503
Received on Ice (Y/N): Yes Temp: 3 °C
PERC - Semi-Annual MW
AWWTP - Q222
C2D1503
Result RDL Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Analyte(s) Limit Flag
Anions - Batch Quality Control
Batch 2D25034 - Analyzed as received
Blank (2D25034-BLK1) Prepared & Analyzed: 04/25/22
Fluoride 0.0311 0.1 0.02 mg/L J
LCS (2D25034-BS1) Prepared & Analyzed: 04/25/22
Fluoride 0.852 0.1 0.02 mg/L 0.800 106 90-110
Matrix Spike (2D25034-MS1) Source: C2D1503-01 Prepared & Analyzed: 04/25/22 Fluoride 0.955 0.1 0.02 mg/L 0.400 0.505 112 75-125
Matrix Spike Dup (2D25034-MSD1) Source: C2D1503-01 Prepared & Analyzed: 04/25/22 Fluoride 0.963 0.1 0.02 mg/L 0.400 0.505 114 75-125 0.8 20 mailing
P.O. Box 432
Riverside, CA 92502-0432
CA ELAP No. 2698
EPA No. CA00102
NELAP No. OR4035
LACSD No. 10119
P (951) 653-3351
F (951) 653-1662
www.babcocklabs.com
location
6100 Quail Valley Court
Riverside, CA 92507-0704
548
Client Name:

Report Date:

PERC Water Corp
19101 Jonathan St.

Dave Kachelski
Adelanto, CA 92301
Contact:

Address: Project Number:

Analytical Report: Page 14 of 18
Project Name:
12-May-2022
Work Order Number: C2D1503
Received on Ice (Y/N): Yes Temp: 3 °C
PERC - Semi-Annual MW
AWWTP - Q222
C2D1503
Result RDL Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Analyte(s) Limit Flag
Solids - Batch Quality Control
Batch 2D19076 - Analyzed as received
Blank (2D19076-BLK1) Prepared & Analyzed: 04/19/22
Total Dissolved Solids ND 10 10 mg/L
Duplicate (2D19076-DUP1) Source: C2D1503-09 Prepared & Analyzed: 04/19/22 Total Dissolved Solids 579 10 10 mg/L 583 0.7 20
Duplicate (2D19076-DUP2) Source: C2D1503-10 Prepared & Analyzed: 04/19/22 Total Dissolved Solids 518 10 10 mg/L 519 0.2 20
mailing
P.O. Box 432
Riverside, CA 92502-0432
CA ELAP No. 2698
EPA No. CA00102
NELAP No. OR4035
LACSD No. 10119
P (951) 653-3351
F (951) 653-1662
www.babcocklabs.com
location
6100 Quail Valley Court
Riverside, CA 92507-0704
549
Client Name:

Report Date:

PERC Water Corp
19101 Jonathan St.

Dave Kachelski
Adelanto, CA 92301
Contact:

Address: Project Number:

Analytical Report: Page 15 of 18
Project Name:
12-May-2022
Work Order Number: C2D1503
Received on Ice (Y/N): Yes Temp: 3 °C
PERC - Semi-Annual MW
AWWTP - Q222
C2D1503
Result RDL Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Analyte(s) Limit Flag
Nutrients - Batch Quality Control
Batch 2E02067 - Acid Digest
Blank (2E02067-BLK1) Prepared: 05/02/22 Analyzed: 05/03/22 Kjeldahl Nitrogen ND 0.1 0.09 mg/L
LCS (2E02067-BS1) Prepared: 05/02/22 Analyzed: 05/03/22 Kjeldahl Nitrogen 0.861 0.1 0.09 mg/L 1.00 86 80-120
Matrix Spike (2E02067-MS1) Source: C2D1503-01 Prepared: 05/02/22 Analyzed: 05/03/22 Kjeldahl Nitrogen 1.08 0.1 0.09 mg/L 1.00 0.158 92 42-154 Matrix Spike Dup (2E02067-MSD1) Source: C2D1503-01 Prepared: 05/02/22 Analyzed: 05/03/22 Kjeldahl Nitrogen 1.15 0.1 0.09 mg/L 1.00 0.158 100 42-154 7 25 mailing
P.O. Box 432
Riverside, CA 92502-0432
CA ELAP No. 2698
EPA No. CA00102
NELAP No. OR4035
LACSD No. 10119
P (951) 653-3351
F (951) 653-1662
www.babcocklabs.com
location
6100 Quail Valley Court
Riverside, CA 92507-0704
550
Client Name:

Report Date:

PERC Water Corp
19101 Jonathan St.

Dave Kachelski
Adelanto, CA 92301
Contact:

Address: Project Number:

Analytical Report: Page 16 of 18
Project Name:
12-May-2022
Work Order Number: C2D1503
Received on Ice (Y/N): Yes Temp: 3 °C
PERC - Semi-Annual MW
AWWTP - Q222
C2D1503
Result RDL Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Analyte(s) Limit Flag
Metals and Metalloids - Batch Quality Control
Batch 2D21052 - EPA 200.2
Blank (2D21052-BLK1) Prepared: 04/21/22 Analyzed: 04/26/22 Boron ND 0.10 0.033 mg/L
LCS (2D21052-BS1) Prepared: 04/21/22 Analyzed: 04/26/22 Boron 0.777 0.10 0.033 mg/L 0.833 93 85-115
Matrix Spike (2D21052-MS1) Source: C2D1248-02 Prepared: 04/21/22 Analyzed: 04/26/22 Boron 1.11 0.20 0.067 mg/L 0.833 0.244 104 70-130
Matrix Spike Dup (2D21052-MSD1) Source: C2D1248-02 Prepared: 04/21/22 Analyzed: 04/26/22 Boron 1.04 0.20 0.067 mg/L 0.833 0.244 96 70-130 6 20
Batch 2D25015 - EPA 200.2
Blank (2D25015-BLK1) Prepared: 04/25/22 Analyzed: 04/26/22 Boron ND 0.10 0.033 mg/L
LCS (2D25015-BS1) Prepared: 04/25/22 Analyzed: 04/26/22 Boron 0.782 0.10 0.033 mg/L 0.833 94 85-115
Matrix Spike (2D25015-MS1) Source: C2D1503-09 Prepared: 04/25/22 Analyzed: 04/26/22 Boron 1.01 0.10 0.033 mg/L 0.833 0.237 93 70-130
Matrix Spike Dup (2D25015-MSD1) Source: C2D1503-09 Prepared: 04/25/22 Analyzed: 04/26/22 Boron 1.05 0.10 0.033 mg/L 0.833 0.237 98 70-130 4 20
mailing
P.O. Box 432
Riverside, CA 92502-0432
CA ELAP No. 2698
EPA No. CA00102
NELAP No. OR4035
LACSD No. 10119
P (951) 653-3351
F (951) 653-1662
www.babcocklabs.com
location
6100 Quail Valley Court
Riverside, CA 92507-0704
551
Client Name:

Report Date:

PERC Water Corp
19101 Jonathan St.

Dave Kachelski
Adelanto, CA 92301
Contact:

Address: Project Number:

Analytical Report: Page 17 of 18
Project Name:
12-May-2022
Work Order Number: C2D1503
Received on Ice (Y/N): Yes Temp: 3 °C
PERC - Semi-Annual MW
AWWTP - Q222
C2D1503
Notes and Definitions
J Estimated value
N_RLd The reporting limit has been raised due to sample dilution. The dilution was required to get one or more target analytes within the calibration range of the instrument.

NR: Not Reported
ND: Analyte NOT DETECTED at or above the Method Detection Limit (if MDL is reported), otherwise at or above the Reportable Detection Limit (RDL)
RDL: Reportable Detection Limit
MDL: Method Detection Limit
* / (Non-NELAP): NELAP does not offer accreditation for this analyte/method/matrix combination e-Standard_No Alias.rpt
This report applies only to the sample(s) analyzed. As a mutual protection to clients, the public, and Babcock Laboratories, Inc., this report is submitted and accepted for the exclusive use of the Client to whom it is addressed. Interpretation and use of the information contained within this report are the sole responsibility of the Client. Babcock Laboratories, Inc. is not responsible for any misinformation or consequences that may result from misinterpretation or improper use of this report. This report is not to be modified or abbreviated in any way.

Additionally, this report is not to be used, in whole or in part, in any advertising or publicity matter without written authorization from Babcock Laboratories, Inc. The liability of Babcock Laboratories, Inc. is limited to the actual cost of the requested analyses, unless otherwise agreed upon in writing. There is no other warranty expressed or implied.

Enclosed are the analytical results for the submitted sample(s). Babcock Laboratories certify the data presented as part of this report meet the minimum quality standards in the referenced analytical methods. Any exceptions have been noted.

Approval
cc:

Cindy A. Waddell
mailing
P.O. Box 432
Riverside, CA 92502-0432
CA ELAP No. 2698
EPA No. CA00102
NELAP No. OR4035
LACSD No. 10119
P (951) 653-3351
F (951) 653-1662
www.babcocklabs.com
location
6100 Quail Valley Court
Riverside, CA 92507-0704
552
Client Name:

Report Date:

PERC Water Corp
19101 Jonathan St.

Dave Kachelski
Adelanto, CA 92301
Contact:

Address: Project Number:

Analytical Report: Page 18 of 18
Project Name:
12-May-2022
Work Order Number: C2D1503
Received on Ice (Y/N): Yes Temp: 3 °C
PERC - Semi-Annual MW
AWWTP - Q222
C2D1503
mailing
P.O. Box 432
Riverside, CA 92502-0432
CA ELAP No. 2698
EPA No. CA00102
NELAP No. OR4035
LACSD No. 10119
P (951) 653-3351
F (951) 653-1662
www.babcocklabs.com
location
6100 Quail Valley Court
Riverside, CA 92507-0704
553

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
DATE: May 25, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Brenda Clark, CMC, City Clerk
BY: City Attorney
SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR ADOPTION OF CHAPTER

9.110 TO THE ADELANTO MUNICIPAL CODE FOR A NOISE CONTROL

ORDINANCE
STAFF RECOMMENDS:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt proposed Ordinance No. 631, also referred to as “Noise Control”, designed to limit the adverse effects of unwanted and intrusive noises within the City of Adelanto (“City”). This Ordinance will create criteria and procedures for the measuring of sound levels in accordance with various zoning areas, as well as penalties for noise level violations pursuant to the Adelanto Municipal Code. It shall take effect thirty (30) days after passage.

BACKGROUND:

California Health and Safety Code Section 46001 empowers cities to declare, prohibit, and abate nuisances. These nuisances include excessive noise that at high volumes create serious hazards to public health and welfare. Continuous bombardment of noise within City limits can lead to physiological, psychological, and economic damage. Staff seeks passage of this Noise Control ordinance to promote a safe and nuisance free environment in the City.

ANALYSIS:

The proposed ordinance sets ambient noise level limitations for residential, commercial, and industrial areas. Commercial and industrial areas have higher designated base ambient noise levels than residential areas. The ordinance calls for a lower residential base noise level during evening times (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.).

A noise violation is determined using a specified sound meter placed either at a complaining party’s property line closest to the noise source or along the offending property’s boundary line where the noise level is at a maximum. Prohibited noise levels are those lasting between five and twenty decibels above the prescribed ambient noise levels for specified time periods.

Relevant factors for determining violations include, but are not limited to, the sounds levels of the ambient and offending noise(s), the noise’s proximity to sleeping facilities, the relevant properties’ nature and zoning, the nature and origin of the noise, and when the prospective violation occurs.
554
May 25, 2022

Page 2 ends

Classified Noise Disturbances & Exemptions
The ordinance provides a list of acts classified as noise disturbances if they emit noise exceeding the prescribed decibel levels. These include the use of:
• Stereos (including car stereos), musical instruments, and loudspeakers; • Non-permitted street sales by shouting except at specified licensed public events; • Car horns, modified car mufflers, and the racing of automotive engines while a vehicle is stationary;
• Firearms and explosives;
• Loading and unloading cargo during certain evening and early morning hours; • Testing of emergency and nonemergency signals during specified times; and Classified noise disturbances also include creating excessive within or adjacent to “noise sensitive zones,” which include:
• Hospitals and nursing homes;
• Police or Sheriff’s station, and fire stations;
• Schools, including nursery schools and preschools; and • Libraries and courthouses
Additionally, the use of power tools and landscaping equipment are specified as noise disturbances if used during specified times.

The eleven exemptions include: noises pertaining to:
• Emergencies and emergency responses;
• Warning devices;
• Public and private construction projects;
• Outdoor gatherings and activities conducted pursuant to required permits; • Roadway traffic;
• Airport operations;
• Trash collection; and
• Noncommercial public speaking with the use of a loudspeaker upon issuance of a variance.

Enforcement
Violations of the proposed Noise Control ordinance are considered public nuisances.

Enforcement can be made in one of two ways:

1. Through the summary abatement procedures delineated in Section 1.20.070. a. Where violations present “an imminent danger or hazard or is imminently injurious to the public health or safety.”
b. Enforcement officer attempts contact with responsible person and demands immediate abatement.
c. If unable to make contact or responsible person does not abate, then enforcement offer is “authorized to take all actions deemed reasonably necessary to correct the Code violation or abate the public nuisance with the use of City forces or its agents or representatives.” (Sec. 120.070.(B)(1)(c).)

2. If feasible, initial written warning provided to responsible person, with notices for 555
May 25, 2022

Page 3 ends

subsequent violations.
a. Written warning not ineffective due to refusal to sign. b. If refusal to sign/accept warning, then warning can be posted in a conspicuous place on the offending property with a copy subsequently mailed via certified mail. (Sec. 1.20.020(D).)
The ordinance defines the responsible person as the person who owns, leases, or is lawfully in charge of the property or motor vehicle where the violation occurs, or the person who owns or controls the source of the excessive noise. If a minor, then it is the minor’s parent or guardian.

First violations are punishable with a fine not exceeding $1,000.00, pursuant to Chapter 1.20 of the Adelanto Municipal Code. Fines for subsequent violations within a twelve-month period escalate from maximums of $1,250.00 for a second conviction, $1,500 for a third conviction, and $2,000 for a fourth and any subsequent conviction.

The City Attorney shall have discretion to charge such violations as an infraction based on the facts and circumstances of any alleged violation.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The ordinance calls for the use of a Type S2A Sound Level Meter. The City should apportion at minimum $600.00 for the purchase of such device. There is no other additional cost to the city.
556
1 ORDINANCE NO. 628

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL, OF THE

CITY OF ADELANTO, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 9.110 (NOISE CONTROL) TO TITLE 9 (PUBLIC PEACE, SAFETY

AND MORALS) OF THE ADELANTO MUNICIPAL CODE REGULATING NOISE LEVELS WHEREAS, the City of Adelanto is a municipal corporation, duly organized under the constitution and laws of the State of California;
WHEREAS, pursuant to its police power, the City may enact and enforce laws within its boundaries which promote the public health, morals, safety, or general welfare of the community, and are not in conflict with general laws;
WHEREAS, California Health and Safety Code Section 46001 provides that the City of Adelanto may make and enforce additional regulations to declare, prohibit, and abate nuisances within its jurisdictional limits;
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that it has a responsibility to protect the health and welfare of its citizens by the control, prevention, and abatement of excessive noise; WHEREAS, the City Council finds that excessive noise in residential areas is detrimental to public health and welfare and constitutes a serious and imminent hazard and a public nuisance, and is imminently injurious to public health and safety;
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that City residents should be provided a peaceful environment free from the intrusion of noise that jeopardizes their health or welfare; WHEREAS, the City Council finds and recognizes that while certain levels of noise are unavoidable, the elimination of noise beyond that which is essential to everyday living is beneficial to all residents of the City; and
WHEREAS, the City Council seeks to establish the means to prevent and abate intrusions of excessive noise upon its residents and achieve an environment facilitating public health and welfare;

NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ADELANTO DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The recitals set forth above are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by this reference as if set forth in full herein.

Section 2. Chapter 9.110 of Title 9, is hereby added to the Adelanto Municipal Code to read as follows:
557
2 Chapter 9.110 Noise Control
Sections:

9.110.010 Purpose

9.110.020 Definitions

9.110.030 Noise Measurement Criteria

9.110.040 Noise Measurement Procedure

9.110.050 Base Ambient Noise Levels

9.110.060 Noise Levels Prohibited

9.110.070 Noise Source Exemptions

9.110.080 Disturbing Noises Prohibited

9.110.090 Noise Disturbances- Acts Specified

9.110.100 Public Nuisance

9.110.110 Notice and Penalties

9.110.120 Additional Penalties

9.110.010 Purpose.

The purpose of this chapter is to establish criteria and standards for the regulation of noise levels within the City of Adelanto. The City Council declares and finds that excessive noise levels are detrimental to the public health, welfare, and safety and are contrary to the public interest. It is this chapter’s intent to protect persons form excessive levels of noise from sources including but not limited to; persons, animals, or fowl; automobiles, motorcycles, engines, machines, or other mechanical devices; and loudspeakers, speakers, musical instruments, stereos, radios, televisions, record players or other amplifying devices. This chapter includes standards for the measurement of noise levels to ensure that noise levels do not disturb and interfere with the peace, comfort, or repose of the residents of the neighborhood from which the noise is emitted.

9.110.020 Definitions.

The following words and phrases, whenever used in this Chapter, shall have the meanings defined in this section unless the context clearly requires otherwise:

A. “A-weighted sound level” means the sound pressure level in decibels as measured on a sound level meter using A-weighting network. The level to read is designated db(A) or dB(A).

B. “Ambient Noise level” means the all-encompassing noise level associated with a given environment, being a composite of sounds from all sources, excluding any intrusive noise.
558
3 C. "Commercial area" means any area occupied by businesses which sell, rent, trade, or store goods, or which provide a service.

D. "Decibel (dB)" means a unit for measuring the amplitude of a sound, equal to twenty (20) times the logarithm to the base 10 of the ratio of the pressure of the sound measured to the reference pressure, which is twenty (20) micropascals (twenty (20) micronewtons per square meter).

E. "Emergency" means any occurrence or set of circumstances involving actual or imminent danger, physical trauma or property damage that demands immediate action.

F. "Emergency work" means any work performed for the purpose of preventing or alleviating the danger, physical trauma or property damage threatened or caused by an emergency.

G. "Industrial area" means any area occupied by land uses whose primary operation involves manufacturing, assembling, processing, or otherwise treating raw materials, semifinished products, or finished products, for packaging and distribution to either wholesale or retail markets.

H. "Noise" means any sound which annoys or disturbs humans, or which causes or tends to cause an adverse psychological or physiological effect on humans.

I. "Noise disturbance" means any sound which (a) endangers or injures the safety or health of humans or animals, or (b) annoys or disturbs a reasonable person of normal sensitivities, or (c) endangers or injures personal or real property.

J. "Noise sensitive zone" means any area designated for the purpose of insuring exceptional quiet, including a school (including nursery school and preschool), church, library, courthouse, daycare facility, while the same is in use, or any hospital, nursing home, or care facility.

K. "Noise source" means a disturbance-causing operation which originates from a single unit or noise generating mechanism which operates simultaneously.

Example of a single noise source is the combination of motor, pump, and compressor; or a power plant with several boilers.

L. "Noise zone" means defined areas or regions of a generally consistent land use community wherein the ambient noise levels are generally similar (within a range of five (5) decibels). Typically, most sites within any given noise zone will be of comparable proximity to major noise sources.
559
4 M. "Noncommercial purpose" means the use, operation, or maintenance of any sound equipment for other than a commercial purpose, including, but not limited to, philanthropic, political, patriotic and charitable purposes.

N. “Person” means any natural person, partnership, cooperative association, corporation, personal representative, receiver, trustee, assignee, or any other legal entity.

O. "Public space" means any real property or structures thereon which are owned or controlled by a governmental entity and normally accessible to the public, including but not limited to parks and other recreation areas.

P. "Public right-of-way" means any street, avenue, boulevard, highway, sidewalk or alley or similar place which is owned or controlled by a governmental entity.

Q. “Responsible person” means any person who owns, leases, or is lawfully in charge of the property or motor vehicle where the noise violation takes place, or any person who owns or controls the source of the noise or violation. If the responsible person is a minor, then the parent or guardian who has custody of the child at the time of the violation shall be the responsible person who is liable under this chapter.

R. "Sound" means an oscillation in pressure, particle displacement, particle velocity or other physical parameter, in a medium with internal forces that causes compression and rarefaction of that medium. The description of sound may include any characteristic of such sound, including duration, intensity, and frequency.

S. "Sound amplifying equipment" means any machine or device for the amplification of the human voice, or music, or any other sound, excluding standard automobiles when used and heard only by the occupants of the vehicle in which the device is installed and, as used in this Chapter, warning devices on authorized emergency vehicles or horns or other warning devices on any vehicle used only for traffic safety purposes.

T. "Sound level" means the weighted sound pressure level obtained by the use of a sound level meter and frequency weighting network, such as A, B or C, as specified in American National Standards Institute specifications for sound level meters (ANSI S1.4-l971 or the latest approved revision thereof). If the frequency weighting employed is not indicated, the A-weighting shall apply.

U. "Sound level meter" means an instrument, including a microphone, an amplifier, an output meter, and frequency weighting networks for the measurement of sound levels, which satisfies the requirements pertinent for type S2A meters in American National Standards Institute specifications for sound level meters, S1.4- 1971, or the most recent revision thereof.
560
5 V. "Vibration" means mechanical motion of the earth or ground, building, or other type of structure, induced by the operation of any mechanical device or equipment located upon or affixed thereto.

9.110.030 Noise Measurement Criteria.

Any noise level measurements made pursuant to the provisions of this chapter shall be performed using a sound level meter as defined in this chapter. The location selected for measuring exterior noise levels shall be at the property line of the property containing the offending noise source at which the noise level is at a maximum, or along the affected property’s boundary line closest to the noise source.

9.110.040 Noise Measurement Procedure.

A. The measurement procedure presented in this Section assumes that personnel performing the noise measurements have been trained in the use of the instruments and in interpretation of measured data. Upon receipt of a complaint from a citizen, an agent of the City, equipped with sound level measurement equipment satisfying the requirements specified in Section 9.110.020, shall investigate the complaint. The investigation shall consist of a measurement and the gathering of data to adequately define the noise problem, and shall include the following:

1. Nonacoustic Data.
a. Type of noise source.
b. Location of noise source relative to complainant's property. c. Time period during which noise source is considered by complainant to be intrusive.
d. Total duration of noise produced by noise source.
e. Date and time of noise measurement survey.

2. Procedure. Utilizing the A weighting scale of the sound level meter and the slow meter response, the noise level shall be measured at a position or positions along the complainant's property line closest to the noise source or at the location along the offending property’s boundary line where the noise level is at a maximum. In general, the microphone shall be located five feet (5') above the ground and ten feet (10') or more from the nearest reflective surface, where possible. However, in those cases where another elevation is deemed appropriate, the latter shall be utilized. If the noise complaint is related to interior noise levels, interior noise measurements shall be made at a point at least four feet (4') from the wall, ceiling, or floor 561
6 nearest the noise source with windows in the normal seasonal configuration.

Calibration of the instrument being used shall be performed immediately prior to and following the recording of any noise data utilizing the acoustic calibrator.

9.110.050 Base Ambient Noise Levels.

All ambient noise measurements shall commence in decibels within the respective zones and times as follows:

Zone Time Sound Level Decibels
All Residential Zones 10:01pm to 7:00am
7:01am to 10:00pm
45 dB(A)
55dBA
All Commercial Zones Anytime 70 dB(A)
All Industrial Zones Anytime 75 dB(A)
If the ambient noise level exceeds the applicable limit as noted in the above table, the ambient noise level shall be the standard.

9.110.060. Noise Levels Prohibited
A. Unless otherwise permitted, noise levels shall not exceed the ambient noise levels in Section 9.11.050 by the following dB(A) levels for the cumulative period of time specified:

1. Less than 5dB(A) for a cumulative period of more than thirty minutes in any hour.

2. Less than 10 dB(A) for a cumulative period of more than fifteen minutes in any hour.

3. Less than 15 dB(A) for a cumulative period of more than five minutes in any hour.

4. Less than 20 dB(A) for a cumulative period of more than one minute in any hour.

5. 20 dB(A) or more for any period of time.

9.110.070 Noise Source Exemptions.

A. The following activities shall be exempted from the provisions of this chapter:

1. All mechanical devices, apparatus or equipment used, related to or connected with emergency machinery, vehicles or work including for the purpose of responding to an emergency, or necessary to restore, preserve, protect or save lives or property from imminent danger of loss or harm. 562
7 2. Warning devices that are required by law to protect the health, safety and welfare of the community.

3. The provisions of this regulation shall not preclude the construction, operation, maintenance and repairs of equipment, apparatus or facilities of park and recreation projects, public works projects or essential public works services and facilities.

4. Activities conducted on the grounds of any elementary, intermediate, secondary, or post-secondary school during regular hours of operation.

5. Outdoor gatherings, public dances and shows, provided said events are authorized by the City.

6. Activities conducted in public parks and public playgrounds, provided said events are conducted pursuant to a permit as required by this Code.

7. Any activity to the extent regulation thereof has been preempted by state or federal law.

8. Traffic on any roadway or railroad right-of-way, including public transit operations.

9. The operation of any airport.

10. Construction, alteration, and demolition activity on private properties that are determined by the director of building and safety to be essential to the completion of a project.

11. Refuse collection conducted by the City’s franchised waste collection service(s).

12. Sounds generated in commercial and industrial zones that are necessary and incidental to the uses permitted therein.

13. Sounds generated in connection with speech or communication protected by the U.S. Constitution or the California Constitution, except to the extent such sounds are subject to permissible time, manner and place restrictions.

9.110.080 Disturbing Noises Prohibited.

A. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Chapter, and in addition thereto, it is unlawful for any person to willfully make or continue, or cause to be made or continued, a loud, unnecessary or unusual noise which disturbs the peace and quiet of any neighborhood or which causes any discomfort or annoyance to any reasonable person of normal sensitiveness residing in the area.

B. The standards that shall be considered in determining whether a violation of the provisions of this Section exist shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
563
8 1. The sound level of the objectionable noise.

2. The sound level of the ambient noise.

3. The proximity of the noise to residential sleeping facilities.

4. The nature and zoning of the area within which the noise emanates and the area where it is received.

5. The density of the inhabitation of the area within which the noise emanates and where it is received.

6. The time of day or night the noise occurs.

7. The duration of the noise and its tonal, informational or musical content.

8. Whether the nature of the noise is usual or unusual.

9. Whether the origin of the noise is natural or unnatural.

10. Whether the noise is continuous, recurrent, or intermittent.

11. Whether the noise is produced by a commercial or noncommercial activity.

9.110.090 Noise Disturbances - Acts Specified.

The following acts, and the causing or permitting thereof, are declared to be in violation of this Chapter:

A. Radios, television sets, musical instruments, and similar devices. Operating, playing, or permitting the operation or playing of any radio, car radio, stereo, car stereo, stereo receiver, computer, compact disc player, tape recorder, cassette player, television set, phonograph, drum, musical instrument, or similar device, which produces or reproduces sound such that the sound therefrom creates a noise disturbance across a residential real property line, including partitions common to two residences within a building, or at any time violates the provisions of Sections

9.110.060. Notwithstanding the provisions of any other Section in this Chapter, the provisions of this subsection may be enforced by a peace officer.

B. Loudspeakers (amplified sound). Using or operating for any purpose any loudspeaker, loudspeaker system, or similar device between the hours of ten p.m. and eight a.m. the following day, such that the sound therefrom creates a noise disturbance across a residential real property line, including partitions common to two residences within a building, or at any time violates the provisions of Sections

9.110.060, except for any noncommercial public speaking, public assembly or other activity for which a variance has been issued by the appropriate City department.

C. Street sales. Offering for sale, selling anything or advertising by shouting or outcry within any residential or commercial area or noise sensitive zone of the City except by variance issued by the appropriate City department. The provisions of this subsection shall not be construed to prohibit the selling by outcry of merchandise, food and beverages at licensed sporting events, parades, carnivals, fairs, circuses or other similar licensed public entertainment events. 564
9 D. Automobile horns. Sounding any horn or signal device on any automobile, motorcycle, bus, or other motor vehicle in any other manner or circumstances or for any other purpose than required or permitted by the Vehicle Code or other California law.

E. Automotive engines and mufflers. Racing the engine of any motor vehicle while the vehicle is not in motion, except when necessary to do so in the course of repairing, adjusting or testing the same. Additionally, operating or permitting the use of any motor vehicle on any public right-of-way or public place or on private property within a residential zone for which the exhaust muffler, intake muffler or any other noise abatement device has been modified or changed in a manner such that the noise emitted by the motor vehicle is increased above that emitted by the vehicle as originally manufactured.

F. Loading and unloading. Loading, unloading, opening, closing or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or similar objects between the hours of ten p.m. and seven a.m. the following day in such a manner as to cause a noise disturbance across a residential real property line or at any time to violate the provisions of Sections 9.110.060.

G. Vibration. Operating or permitting the operation of any device that creates vibration which is above the vibration perception threshold of an individual at or beyond the property boundary of the source if on private property or at one hundred fifty feet (150') (forty-six (46) meters) from the source if on a public space or public right-of-way. For the purposes of this subsection, "vibration perception threshold" means the minimum ground or structure-borne vibrational motion necessary to cause a normal person to be aware of the vibration by such directed means as, but not limited to, sensation by touch or visual observation of moving objects. The perception threshold shall be presumed to be .001 g's in the frequency range 0—30 hertz and .003 g's in the frequency range between thirty and one hundred hertz.

H. Explosives, firearms, and similar devices. Using or firing explosives, firearms, firecrackers, or similar devices such that the sound therefrom creates a noise disturbance across a real property line, or within a noise sensitive zone, public space or public right-of-way, without first obtaining a variance issued by an authorized City employee.

I. Stationary nonemergency signaling devices.

1. Sounding or permitting the sounding of any electronically amplified signal from any stationary bell, chime, siren, whistle, or similar device, intended primarily for nonemergency purposes, from any place, for more than ten (10) seconds in any hourly period.
565
10 2. Houses of religious worship and chimes in the civic center shall be exempt from the operation of this provision.

3. Sound sources covered by this provision and not exempted under Subsection 9.110.090.I.2 of this Section may be exempted by a variance issued by the appropriate City department.

J. Emergency signaling devices.

1. The intentional sounding or permitting the sounding outdoors of any fire, burglar or civil defense alarm, siren, whistle or similar stationary emergency signaling device, or any motor vehicle burglar alarm, except for emergency purposes or for testing, as provided in Subsection

9.110.090.J.2.

2. Testing of a stationary emergency signaling device shall not occur before eight a.m. or after seven p.m. Any such testing shall only use the minimum cycle test time. In no case shall such test time exceed ten (10) seconds.

3. Testing of the complete emergency signaling system, including the functioning of the signaling device and the personnel response to the signaling device shall not occur more than once in each calendar month.

Such testing shall not occur before eight a.m. or after seven p.m. The time limit specified in Subsection 9.110.090.J.2 of this Section shall not apply to such complete system testing.

4. Sounding or permitting the sounding of any exterior burglar or fire alarm unless such alarm is automatically terminated within fifteen (15) minutes of activation. Such testing shall not occur before eight a.m. or after seven p.m.

K. Noise sensitive zones.

1. Creating or causing the creation of any sound within any noise sensitive zone, so as to exceed the specified land use noise standards set forth in Sections 9.110.060; or

2. Creating or causing the creation of any sound within or adjacent to any noise sensitive zone containing a hospital, nursing home, police or Sheriff’s station, fire station, school (including nursery school and preschool), library, courthouse, or other designated use so as to interfere with the functions of such activity or annoy the patients or participants of such activity(ies).
566
11 L. Domestic power tools and landscaping equipment.

1. Operating or permitting the operation of any mechanically powered saw, sander, drill, grinder, lawn or garden tool, or similar tool between nine p.m. and seven a.m. the following day so as to create a noise disturbance across a residential or commercial real property line.

2. Any motor, machinery, pump, etc., shall be sufficiently enclosed or muffled and maintained so as not to create a noise disturbance.

3. Operating leaf blowers, consisting of portable power equipment used in any landscape maintenance, construction, property repair or property maintenance for the purpose of blowing, dispersing or redistributing dust, dirt, leaves, grass clippings, cuttings, or trimmings from plants, trees or other debris is unlawful if operated within any residential area or in any nonresidential area within four hundred feet (400') of any residential area in the City between the hours after eight p.m. and before seven a.m. Monday through Friday, after seven p.m. and before nine a.m. on Saturdays, and after seven p.m. and before ten a.m. on Sundays and legal holidays. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 9.110.110, violations of this subsection shall be infractions except as specifically provided in this Section. The first violation in any one (1) year period shall be subject to a fine of fifty dollars ($50.00); a second violation in any one (1) year period shall be subject to a fine of seventy-five dollars ($75.00); a third violation in any one (1) year period shall be subject to a fine of one hundred and fifty dollars ($150.00). A fourth or subsequent violation of this Subsection in any one (1) year period may be filed as a misdemeanor pursuant to Section 1.20.010.

Notwithstanding the provisions of any other Section in this Chapter, the provisions of this subsection may be enforced by a peace officer.

M. Air-conditioning or air refrigerating equipment. Operating or permitting the operation of any air-conditioning or air refrigerating equipment in such a manner as to exceed any of the following sound levels measured as specified in the American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Engineers Code of Recommended Practices:

Measurement Location Units Installed Before 01-01-80
dB(A)
Units Installed After 01-01-80
dB(A)
Any point on neighboring
property line, five feet above
grade level, no closer than three
feet from any wall
60 55
567
12 Center of neighboring patio five
feet above grade level, no closer
than three feet from any wall
55 50
Outside the neighboring living
area window nearest the
equipment location, not more
than three feet from the window
opening, but at least three feet
from any other surface
55 50

9.110.100 Public Nuisance.

A violation of this chapter by any person responsible for committing, causing or maintaining such violation shall constitute a public nuisance that shall be subject to the provisions of Chapters 9.110 and 1.20 of this code.

9.110.110 Notice and Penalties.

Enforcement of any provision of this chapter may be made through Section

1.20.070.

A violation of any provision of this chapter shall, if feasible, first be the subject of a written notice to the responsible person that if, within a twelve (12) month period following the initial response, city personnel, including a peace officer, are again required to respond to the same person for violating this chapter, a criminal and/or administrative citation will be issued pursuant to Chapter 1.20 of this Code. Such notice shall be signed by the responsible person, however, such notice shall not be ineffective due to a party’s refusal to sign. If a responsible person declines or refuses to accept or sign any warning or notice, then such warning or notice may be issued pursuant to Section 1.20.020.D. Subsequent violation(s) occurring after issuance of a written warning shall be cause for a criminal and/or administrative citation to be issued pursuant to Chapter 1.20 and subject to appropriate legal action as provided by law including criminal and/or civil enforcement.

Notwithstanding section 9.110.090.L.3, any person found to be violating any provision of this chapter shall be punishable in accordance with Chapter 1.20 and a fine not to exceed $1,000.00 for the first violation.

Any person convicted of a subsequent violation under this chapter shall, for each separate violation, be subject to: (A) a fine in an amount not to exceed one thousand two hundred fifty dollars ($1,250.00) for a second conviction of the same offense within a twelve-month period from the date of the first offense; and (B) a fine in an amount not to exceed fifteen hundred dollars ($1,500) for the third conviction of the same offense within a twelve-month period from the date of the first offense.

The fine for a fourth and any subsequent conviction(s) of the same offense within 568
13 a twelve-month period from the date of the first offense shall be two thousand dollars ($2,000.00).

In addition, in the discretion of the city attorney and based upon the specific facts and circumstances presented to him or her, any such violation may be charged as an infraction subject to the penalties contained in Chapter 1.20.

9.110.120 Additional Penalties
Nothing in this chapter shall preclude the city from pursuing any other legal remedies provided by this code or otherwise available to the city in law or in equity.

Section 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its final passage.

Section 4. Severability. Should any section or provision of this Ordinance be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, that decision shall not affect the validity of this Ordinance as a whole or any part thereof, other than the part so declared to be invalid.

Section 5. Certification/Summary. Following the City Clerk’s certification that the citizens of Adelanto have approved this Ordinance, the Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be entered in the book of original ordinances of said City; and shall cause the same, or a summary thereof, to be published as required by law.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this _________ day of _______, 2022. ______________________________
Gabriel Reyes, Mayor
_______________________________
Brenda Lopez, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
Marc Tran, City Attorney
569

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
DATE: May 25, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Jessie Flores, City Manager
BY: Marc Tran, City Attorney
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF A 30-DAY RESOLUTION REGARDING THE

CONDUCT OF TELECONFERENCED MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND OTHER CITY BODIES UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54953(e)
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

It is staff's recommendation that the City Council adopt and approve the attached resolution, permitting the City conduct public meetings virtually for all public bodies subject to the Brown Act in accordance with the requirements of Government Code Section 54953(e), which will require reauthorization every (thirty) 30 days.

BACKGROUND:

On March 4, 2020, Governor Gavin Newsom proclaimed a State of Emergency throughout the state of California, in response to the rapid spread and threat of the Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19), which still remains in effect. On March 10, 2020, the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino proclaimed the existence of a local emergency for all of San Bernardino County (“County”) in response to the outbreak of COVID-19 and its impact on the County. On March 13, 2020, the Adelanto City Council (“City Council”) declared a local emergency in response to the conditions of extreme peril to the safety of persons within the City as a result of the rapid spread of COVID-19.

On September 16, 2021, Governor Newsom signed Assembly Bill (AB) 361 (Rivas, 2021), which authorizes local agencies to continue to hold public meetings remotely under modified teleconferencing requirements set forth in the Brown Act (Government Code section 54953(e)) during a state-declared emergency, as that term is defined, and when either state or local health officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing, or in situations when the legislative body has determined that meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees. AB 361 went into effect immediately and sunsets on January 1, 2024.

Under AB 361, legislative bodies of the City can meet remotely during a declared State of Emergency by the Governor that includes the jurisdictional boundaries of the City, if the legislative body determines that one of the following is also true:

1. State or local officials have imposed or recommend social distancing; or 570

2. To determine, by a majority vote, whether to hold remote meetings as a result of the State of Emergency, because meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees; or

3. The legislative body holds a meeting having already determined by a majority vote to hold remote meetings.

Modified Brown Act requirements under AB 361, include, among other provisions, that:
• Members of the public must be allowed to address the body and offer comments in real-time during the meeting.
• In the event of a technical disruption, the public agency cannot take any further action on the agenda until the issue is resolved.
• Public agencies may not require public comments be submitted in advance (this is still a permissible option but cannot be the only option).
• Members of the public must be given a reasonable time to register to provide public comment, if necessary, and agencies that provide a timed public comment period shall not close the remote public comment option until that timed period has expired.

The statewide declaration of emergency continues, in addition, the “SBCOVID-19” section of the San Bernardino County website continues to state that masks are strongly recommended for all persons, regardless of vaccine status, in indoor public settings and businesses. With the recommendation that masks continue to be used and the newly detected variant, the City has satisfied the requirements to hold meetings under the modified teleconferenced rules.

Once the initial authorizing resolution is adopted, ongoing authorization every thirty (30) days is required by majority vote. If the legislative body desires to use the teleconference exception available under Government Code Section 54953(e), it must confirm the circumstances of the State of Emergency thirty (30) days after the first teleconference meeting and every thirty (30) days thereafter.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact to the City.

ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution No. 22-35
571
- 1 -
RESOLUTION NO. 22-35

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ADELANTO, COUNTY OF

SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, PROCLAIMING A LOCAL EMERGENCY,

RATIFYING THE PROCLAMATION OF A STATE OF EMERGENCY BY GOVERNOR NEWSOM ON MARCH 4, 2020, AND AUTHORIZING REMOTE TELECONFERENCE

MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY BOARDS, AND ALL COMMISSIONS OF THE CITY OF ADELANTO, FOR THE PERIOD FROM MAY 25, 2022, THROUGH JUNE 24, 2022, PURSUANT TO BROWN ACT PROVISIONS SET FORTH UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54953(e)
WHEREAS, COVID-19 (also known as the “Coronavirus Disease”) is a respiratory disease that was first reported in China in December 2019, it has now spread throughout the state of California, including throughout the City of Adelanto (“City”); and WHEREAS, on March 4, 2020, Governor Gavin Newsom declared a State of Emergency in response to the rising cases of COVID-19 throughout the state of California; and WHEREAS, on March 10, 2020, the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino proclaimed the existence of a local emergency for all of San Bernardino County (“County”) in response to the outbreak of COVID-19 and its impact on the County; and WHEREAS, on March 13, 2020, in response to the conditions of extreme peril to the safety of persons within the City of Adelanto, the Adelanto City Council (“City Council”) declared a local emergency; and
WHEREAS, on March 17, 2020, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-29-20, which allowed local governments meet remotely without adherence to the traditional teleconferencing rules set forth in the Ralph M. Brown Act (“Brown Act”), this waiver was extended through September 30, 2021, by Executive Order N-08-21; and WHEREAS, on September 16, 2021, Governor Newsom signed into law Assembly Bill No. 361 (“AB 361”), which, until January 1, 2024, authorizes a local agency to use teleconferencing without complying with the teleconferencing requirements imposed by the Brown Act, when a legislative body of a local agency holds a meeting during a declared State of Emergency, as that term is defined, when state or local health officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing or when the legislative body has determined that meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees; and WHEREAS, the “SBCOVID-19” section of the San Bernardino County website states that masks are strongly recommended for all persons, regardless of vaccine status, in indoor public settings and businesses; and
WHEREAS, AB 361 requires the legislative body take no further action on agenda items when there is a disruption which prevents the public agency from broadcasting the meeting, or in 572
RESOLUTION NO. 22-35
- 2 -
the event of a disruption within the local agency’s control which prevents members of the public from offering public comments, until public access is restored; and WHEREAS, AB 361 prohibits the legislative body from requiring public comments to be submitted in advance of the meeting and specifies that the legislative body must provide an opportunity for the public to address the legislative body and offer comment in real time; and WHEREAS, AB 361 prohibits the legislative body from closing the public comment period and the opportunity to register to provide public comment, until the public comment period has elapsed or until a reasonable amount of time has elapsed, as specified; and WHEREAS, all City Council, Board, and Commission meetings are open and public, as required by the Brown Act, so that any member of the public may attend, participate, and watch the City Council or City Commission conduct their business; and WHEREAS, the City finds that the continuous spread of COVID-19 throughout the community has caused, and will continue to cause, conditions of peril to the safety of persons within the City that are likely to be beyond the control of the City; and WHEREAS, the City continues to recommend measures to promote social distancing which include recommending staff and civilians wear masks in City buildings; and WHEREAS, in light of the continuing State declaration of emergency resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, the local recommendations for masks for all individuals, and the imminent risks to the health and safety of attendees at meetings conducted in person due to the spread of COVID-19, the City Council desires to make the findings required by Government Code Section 54953(e) to allow the City Council and all City Boards and Commissions to meet under the abbreviated teleconferencing procedures.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ADELANTO DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference.

SECTION 2. The City Council hereby considers the conditions of the State of Emergency in the County and City and proclaims that a local emergency in response to the COVID-19 pandemic persists.

SECTION 3. The City Council hereby ratifies the Governor of the State of California’s Proclamation of State of Emergency, effective as of its issuance date of March 4, 2020.

SECTION 4. The City Manager or designee and legislative bodies of the City are hereby authorized and directed to take all actions necessary to carry out the intent and purpose of this Resolution including, continuing to conduct open and public meetings in accordance with Government Code section 54953(e) and other applicable provisions of the Brown Act. 573
RESOLUTION NO. 22-35
- 3 -
SECTION 5. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption and shall be effective from May 25, 2022, until the earlier of June 24, 2022, or such time as the City Council adopts a subsequent resolution in accordance with Government Code section 54953(e)(3) to extend the time during which the legislative bodies of the City of Adelanto may continue to teleconference without compliance with paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) of section 54953.

SECTION 6. All portions of this Resolution are severable. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Resolution.

SECTION 7. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and that the same shall be in full force and effect.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of May 2022. ______________________________
Gabriel Reyes, Mayor
_______________________________
Brenda Lopez, City Clerk
574
RESOLUTION NO. 22-35
- 4 -
I, Brenda Lopez, City Clerk of the City of Adelanto, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 22-35 was duly and regularly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Adelanto on this 25th day of May, 2022 be the following vote to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS THEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and affix the official seal of the City of Adelanto on the 25th day of May, 2022
______________________________
Brenda Lopez, City Clerk
575

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
DATE: May 25, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Jessie Flores, City Manager
BY: Angel Castellanos, Finance Director; Derik Despain, Senior Accountant SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 26 TO THE AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FOR THE SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT TO PROVIDE CITY LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023 IN THE AMOUNT OF $7,042,015 AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AMENDMENT.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the City Council approve Amendment No. 26 to the agreement with the County of San Bernardino for the Sheriff’s Department to provide City law enforcement services for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 in the amount of $7,042,015 and authorize the City Manager to execute the amendment.

BACKGROUND:

On December 11, 2001, the City Council approved entering into an agreement (Contract Number 01- 1251) (the “Agreement”) with the County of San Bernardino for the Sheriff’s Department to provide law enforcement services (the “Services”) to the City. For Fiscal Year 2021-2022, the City’s level of service is

22.11 for safety personnel and 8.91 for general personnel at a cost of $6,935,064.

The proposed Amendment No. 26 (the “Amendment”) maintains both the safety level ofservice at 22.11 personnel and the general level of service at 8.91 personnel at a total cost of $7,042,015, which is a $106,951 (1.52%) increase over the prior fiscal year. A breakdown of the level of service is included in Attachment 1.

In addition to the Services cost, the City isresponsible for actual overtime costs, on-call costs, all fuel and vehicle maintenance costs, and professional services costs above the contract formula, which are billed to the City on a quarterly invoice.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The total annual cost for FY22/23 is $7,042,015, which will be included in the forthcoming budget.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Amendment No. 26 to the law enforcement services Agreement 576
577
578
579
580

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
DATE: May 25, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Brian Wolfe, City Engineer
SUBJECT: PROPOSED RESOLUTION APPROVING UTILITY EASEMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE DURATION OF A VERIZON LEASE AT 11720 BARTLETT AVE, ADELANTO, CALIFORNIA STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Approval of the attached resolution which grants a utility easement to Verizon for the duration of the existing lease.

BACKGROUND:

This agenda item arises from Verizon’s request for a utility easement through a city owned lot to their wireless tower. The wireless tower is located on property leased from the City. The lease began in 2002 and is attached to this Staff Report as Attachment 1. The lease is due to terminate in 2027. Access to the leased area is through a city owned lot from the right of way.

The duration of the easement is for the remainder of the existing lease, absent any lease extension.

Verizon and the City may negotiate for either a new agreement or lease extension closer to the expiration of the existing lease. Verizon has indicated that the easement is necessary for their existing wireless tower and improving wireless service in the area.

The proposed easement is in furtherance of continuing to collect rental payments from Verizon. The City currently collects $1,083.33 per month from the lease. Verizon will still be required to obtain building permits for any future construction.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None
ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 – Existing Lease
2 – Resolution No. 22-26
- Exhibit A: Grant of Utility Easement
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
RESOLUTION NO. 22-26

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

ADELANTO, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA,

APPROVING AN UTILITY EASEMENT AGREEMENT FOR
THE DURATION OF A VERIZON LEASE AT 11720 BARTLETT

AVE, ADELANTO, CALIFORNIA
WHEREAS, the City of Adelanto (“City”) and Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership doing business as Verizon Wireless (“Verizon”) entered into that certain agreement entitled “Land Lease Agreement” dated August 19, 2002 (“Agreement”) for the purpose of leasing land for the construction and operation of cellular tower; and
WHEREAS, Verizon requires a utility easement through an adjacent city lot located approximately at 11720 Bartlett Avenue (APN: 0459-176-13) for the installation and use of fiber optics from the right-of-way to their leased area and such easement shall expire upon the expiration of the lease, set to expire in 2027.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ADELANTO DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The recitals above are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference.

SECTION 2. The City Council of the City of Adelanto hereby authorizes the City Manager to enter into, make non-material changes, and execute the Grant of Utility Easement, attached hereto as Exhibit A. The City Council further authorizes all other further actions, and the execution and delivery of all other documents required or deemed necessary, to effectuate the purpose of this Resolution.

SECTION 3. This Ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under the following provisions of the CEQA Guidelines: Section 15304(f) because it only involves minor trenching, backfilling and the surface is restored after the installation of utility lines; Section 15061(b)(3) because there is no possibility that it may have a significant effect upon the environment; and Section 15301 because it involves minor alteration with negligible expansion of an existing facility being used for publicly owned utility used to provide a public utility.

SECTION 4. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall attest to the passage of this Resolution.

This Resolution shall become effective upon its adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Adelanto at the regular meeting of this 25th day of May, 2022.

Gabriel Reyes, Mayor
ATTEST:

Brenda Lopez, City Clerk
596
Resolution No. 22-26

Page 3 ends

I, Brenda Lopez, City Clerk of the City of Adelanto, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 22-26 was duly and regularly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Adelanto on this 25th day of May, 2022 be the following vote to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS THEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and affix the official seal of the City of Adelanto on the 25th, day of May 2022
______________________________
Brenda Lopez, City Clerk
597

EXHIBIT A
598

GRANT OF UTILITY EASEMENT
THIS GRANT OF UTILITY EASEMENT (“Easement”) is dated as of the , 2022, by the City of Adelanto (hereinafter “Grantor”) and Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership, a California limited partnership dba Verizon Wireless (hereinafter “Grantee”).

WHEREAS, Grantor isthe owner of certain real property located at 11720 Bartlett Avenue, Adelanto, California and legally described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and made a part hereof (the “Property”).
day of
WHEREAS, Grantor and Grantee are parties to that certain Land Lease Agreement dated August 19, 2002 (the “Lease”) pursuant to which Grantee leases ground space (“Leased Premises”) at the Property for the operation of a communications facility at the Property.

WHEREAS, Grantee desires to install an additional fiber connection at the Property and Grantor has agreed to convey to Grantee an easement over, under and across the Property (the “Easement Area”) as described and depicted in Exhibit “B” attached hereto and made a part hereof.

NOW, THEREFORE,for and in consideration ofthe covenants contained herein, the parties agree as follows:

1. Grant of Easement. Grantor hereby grants to Grantee, its successors and assigns, a nonexclusive easement over, under and acrossthe Easement Area for the purposes of ingress and egress and for constructing, maintaining, operating, repairing and replacing utility lines, cables and conduits to and from the Leased Premises.

Each party shall utilize its estate in a manner which will minimize interference with the other party’s use of its estate.
a.
b. Upon completion of construction, Grantee shall restore the Easement Area to substantially its pre-existing condition.

2. No Permanent Structures. Grantor hereby covenants for and on behalf of itself, its heirs, successors or assigns, that neither it, nor any of them, shall construct or permit to be constructed, any building or any other permanent structure within the Easement Area, or make any permanent excavation, or permit any permanent excavation to be made within the Easement Area.

3. Term. The easement, rights, and privileges herein granted shall be for a term coinciding with the term of the Lease, including any renewals or extensionsthereof, and shall, without any further action on the part of Grantor or Grantee, terminate immediately upon the termination of the Lease for any reason by either party thereto. Upon termination of this Easement for any reason, at Grantor’srequest, Grantee shall execute with acknowledgement and deliver a notice of termination in form suitable for recording in the official records of the County.

Spruce
150528825 1
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
DATE: May 25, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Jessie Flores, City Manager
BY: Angel Castellanos, Director of Finance
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 22-34 APPROVING A HOTEL

TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX REBATE INCENTIVE PROGRAM
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 22-34 approving a Hotel Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) Rebate Incentive Program to aid in attracting investment and assisting in the development of hotels in the City.

BACKGROUND:

A Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) is a tax that is levied on the privilege of using a hotel or motel accommodation. The tax was originally designed to compensate local government for the increased public service costs incurred by serving local tourists and is recognized as a stable source of general fund monies to cities.

In May 2007, the City of Adelanto (“City”) approved and adopted Ordinance No. 461 to establish a TOT, which was thereafter codified under Chapter 3.40 of the Adelanto Municipal Code. The City’s current TOT is a tax of ten percent (10%) charged to transient guests in hotels and motels located within City limits. (Muni. Code § 3.40.030 (A).)
Of the ten percent (10%) levied, eight percent (8%) of the TOT is received and deposited into the City’s general fund for use in any manner deemed to benefit the City, and the remaining two percent (2%) is used for economic development activities of the City. (Muni. Code § 3.40.030 (B).) By way of illustration, a hotel room charge of one hundred dollars ($100) would levy a TOT amount of ten dollars ($10). Of that $10 collected, eight dollars (8%) is dedicated to the City’s general fund, and the remaining two dollars (2%) is dedicated to the City’s economic development activities.

To encourage luxury hotel development, City staff proposes a TOT Rebate Incentive Program to owners and operators of 4- or 3-star/diamond or higher rated hotels located within City limits. City staff believes that such a program would encourage the development of new hotels and promote reinvestment of existing hotels in the City.

The following is a summary of the proposed Program’s purpose, eligibility, limitations and process:
609
Program Purpose:

To offer a financial incentive program that encourages the development of new hotels (four- or threestar/diamond hotel rating or higher) and promotes reinvestment in existing hotels in the City.

Program Description:

As stated above, the City currently has a TOT of ten percent (10%), of which eight percent (8%) collected is direct revenue to the City and two percent (2%) collected is used for economic development.

The TOT rebate to eligible hotel developers under this TOT Rebate Incentive Program will be no more than half (50%) of the TOT the City receives from that same eligible hotel operator or developer for a fixed period of ten (10) years, which will be documented in a binding TOT Rebate Incentive Agreement.

City will fund the TOT rebate with the two percent (2%) of the collected TOT dedicated for economic development, plus three percent (3%) of the TOT collected and dedicated for the City’s general fund.

Therefore, under this Rebate Incentive Program, the City will temporarily receive a TOT of five percent (5%) (as opposed to ten percent (10%)) until the TOT Rebate Incentive Agreement expires.

The individual TOT Rebate Incentive Program Agreement will not be extended beyond the fixed term of ten (10) years. The hotel must receive a Certificate of Occupancy within eighteen (18) months of development plan approval to be eligible for this program, unless another time frame is included in the agreement. If at any time during the term of the TOT Rebate Incentive Agreement the hotel’s rating falls below a four or three star or four or three diamond hotel rating, the agreement shall immediately be terminated.

The applicant must enter into a binding agreement with the City prior to, or at the time of, development application approval.

Estimated TOT revenues shall be based on revenue proforma from like hotel developments (i.e. franchise operator, similar or same brand), as documented in a report subject to the review and approval of the City Finance Director. Actual rebates will be based on actual TOT remitted by the hotel, not estimated amounts.

Subsidies in excess of $100,000 will require a public hearing and a detailed report as required by Government Code section 53083. Subsidies in excess of 1.75% of the project cost require that prevailing wages be paid.

Program Eligibility
This Program is applicable to hotels within the City limits that meet four or three star/diamond hotel ratings or higher, under rating criteria established by the American Automobile Association (AAA), JD Power and Associates, or comparable hotel rating entity.

Existing hotels are also eligible for the Program. Existing hotels must measurably improve the quality of the hotel through either increased capacity or ability to charge higher room rates and/or enhancements to the hotel’s ratings by AAA, JD Power and Associates, or comparable hotel rating entity.

Eligible hotels must have fifty (50) or more rooms and feature hotel operations on a 24 hour per day, 7 days per week basis. The hotel must offer, at a minimum, the following services: housekeeping, food and beverage, room service, banquet and meeting services, concierge, bell service and parking.

Eligible hotels must provide independent, third party, certification acceptable to the City indicating the level of the quality of the hotel as four or three stars/diamond or higher on a yearly basis, during the incentive time period.
610
Program Financial Need:

As part of the application, the applicant must complete a feasibility analysis to demonstrate a funding gap between operating performance and project development or improvement cost. The analysis will be independently reviewed by a City consultant, and must prove that, but for this program, the development or improvement would not occur.

Program Limitations:
(1) The TOT rebate will be no more than half of the ten percent (10%) TOT received by City from eligible operators for a fixed period of not more than ten (10) years. City will fund TOT rebate to hotel operators with the two percent (2%) of the collected TOT used for economic development, plus three percent (3%) of the TOT deposited in the City’s general fund.

Therefore, under this Rebate Incentive Program, the City will temporarily receive no less than five percent (5%) in TOT until the TOT Rebate Incentive Program Agreement expires. (2) Renovated hotels are eligible to receive a TOT rebate of five percent (5%) of the increment above existing TOT levels for up to 10 years.
(3) Any change in star rating below 3 stars for the applicant throughout the lifetime of the Agreement will result in termination of the Agreement.
(4) The hotel must receive a Certificate of Occupancy within 18 months of development plan approval in order to be eligible for this program, unless another time frame is included in the agreement.
(5) The amount of the TOT rebate shall be no greater than the funding gap. (6) The applicant must enter into a binding agreement with the City prior to, or at the time of, development application approval.
(7) Estimated TOT revenues shall be based on revenue proforma from like hotel developments (i.e., franchise operator, similar or same brand) as documented in a report subject to the review and approval of the City Finance Director. Actual rebates will be based upon actual TOT remitted by the hotel, not estimated amounts.

Application Process:

Along with the formal development submittal, the applicant of the proposed hotel must submit a letter of request to Economic Development to participate in the program. The applicant must include the following as part of the application:
(1) Estimated total construction cost
(2) Project timeline
(3) Requested estimated taxes to be reimbursed (to be verified by Finance Department) (4) Third party certification of the development’s rating status (or proposed development) (5) Independent third-party feasibility analysis showing market demand for additional hotel rooms (at a four star or diamond level or higher) within City limits (6) Feasibility analysis demonstrating the need for an economic development subsidy (7) Pro-forma that includes:
a. Projected sales
b. Estimated sales tax revenues to be generated
c. Transient Occupancy Tax
d. Number of new jobs created with corresponding position titles and salary ranges for each position
After a letter is received by Economic Development, the City Manager’s office will schedule an Economic Development Subcommittee meeting to discuss the request from the applicant. Economic Development will also give notice to the Director of Finance, Director of Community Development, and Project Manager regarding the request and the Subcommittee meeting. 611
If the reimbursement is recommended by the Subcommittee, Economic Development will coordinate with Project Manager in Planning regarding the scheduling of the Public Hearing and notify the applicant.

The Applicant must enter into a binding agreement with the City prior to, or at the time of, development application approval. Economic Development will coordinate with the City Attorney’s office for the creation of the TOT Rebate Incentive Agreement. Agreements must be approved no later than the time of project approval by the appropriate hearing body. If the project approval is only subject to Planning Commission approval, the application must be approved at City Council prior to Planning Commission approval.

Reimbursement
Actual rebates will be based upon actual TOT remitted by the hotel, NOT estimated amounts.

The City will rebate fifty percent (50%) of the actual TOT remitted to the applicant after the first full year of operation and annually thereafter until the term of the program ends, or the maximum rebate amount has been reached. The Finance Department will reconcile the TOT payments received from the applicant and create a check request with the appropriate amount to be reimbursed. Finance will issue a check to the applicant within 30 days of the closing of the twelfth full month of operation after Certificate of Operation is issued.

Hotel must provide an independent, third-party certification to the Department of Economic Development indicating the designation of the hotel (four- or three-star or diamond or higher) on a yearly basis, during the incentive time period.

Program applicants will follow all procedures required by Government Code § 53083; AB 562 (2013), including prevailing wage, public hearings and reporting requirements.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The Hotel Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) Rebate Incentive Program will result in a fifty percent (50%) decrease in the amount of TOT the City receives from eligible hotel operators.

ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution No. 22-34
612
RESOLUTION NO. 22-34

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

ADELANTO, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA,

APPROVING A HOTEL TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX REBATE

INCENTIVE PROGRAM
WHEREAS, Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) is a tax that is levied on the privilege of using a hotel or motel accommodation, which was originally designed to compensate local government for the increased public service costs incurred by serving local tourists and is recognized as a stable source of general fund monies to cities; and, WHEREAS, in May 2007, the City of Adelanto (“City”) approved and adopted Ordinance No. 461 to establish a TOT, which was thereafter codified under Chapter 3.40 of the Adelanto Municipal Code; and,
WHEREAS, the City’s current TOT is a tax of ten percent (10%) charged to transient guests in hotels and motels located within City limits pursuant to Adelanto Municipal Code section

3.40.030 (A); and,
WHEREAS, of that ten percent (10%) levied, eight percent (8%) of the TOT is received and deposited into the City’s general fund for use in any manner deemed to benefit the City, and the remaining two percent (2%) is used for economic development activities of the City pursuant to Adelanto Municipal Code section 3.40.030 (B); and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has made economic development a high priority and seeks to develop possible incentives to renovate or update commercial areas in the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to develop the Hotel Transient Occupancy Tax Rebate Incentive Program (“Program”) to owners and operators of 4- or 3-star/diamond or higher rated hotels located within City limits; and
WHEREAS, the Program is designed to encourage the development of new high-quality hotels and promote reinvestment in existing hotels in the City; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Adelanto does hereby approve a Hotel Transient Occupancy Tax Rebate Incentive Program attached hereto as Exhibit A to this Resolution.
613
Resolution No. 22-34

Page 2 ends

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is authorized to undertake such further actions, such as minor amendments to the Program, as may be necessary and desirable to carry out the intent of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of May, 2022. ______________________________
Gabriel Reyes, Mayor
_______________________________
Brenda Lopez, City Clerk
614
Resolution No. 22-34

Page 3 ends

I, Brenda Lopez, City Clerk of the City of Adelanto, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 22-34 was duly and regularly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Adelanto on this 25th day of May, 2022 be the following vote to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS THEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and affix the official seal of the City of Adelanto on the 25yh day of May, 2022.
______________________________
Brenda Lopez, City Clerk
615
EXHIBIT A TO RESOLUTION NO. 22-34

CITY OF ADELANTO

HOTEL TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX REBATE INCENTIVE PROGRAM
Program Purpose:

To offer a financial incentive program that encourages the development of new hotels (four- or three-star/diamond hotel rating or higher) and promotes reinvestment in existing hotels in the City.

Program Description:

The City currently has a TOT of ten percent (10%), of which eight percent (8%) is direct revenue to the City and two percent (2%) is used for economic development. The TOT rebate to eligible hotel developers and operators under the TOT Rebate Incentive Program will be no more than five percent (5%) of that ten percent (10%) (i.e., half of) TOT received by City from an operator for a fixed period of ten (10) years, which is to be documented in a binding TOT Rebate Incentive Agreement.

City will fund the five percent (5%) TOT rebate to operators with the two percent (2%) of the TOT used for economic development, plus three percent (3%) of the TOT deposited in the City’s general fund. Therefore, under this Rebate Incentive Program, the City will temporarily receive no less than five percent (5%) in TOT until the TOT Rebate Incentive Agreement expires.

The individual TOT Rebate Incentive Program Agreement will not be extended beyond the fixed term of ten (10) years. The hotel must receive a Certificate of Occupancy within eighteen (18) months of development plan approval in order to be eligible for this program, unless another time frame is included in the agreement. If at any time during the term of the TOT Rebate Incentive Agreement the hotel’s rating falls below a four or three star or four or three diamond hotel rating, the agreement shall immediately be terminated.

The applicant must enter into a binding agreement with the City prior to, or at the time of, development application approval.

Estimated TOT revenues shall be based on revenue proforma from like hotel developments (i.e. franchise operator, similar or same brand), as documented in a report subject to the review and approval of the City Finance Director. Actual rebates will be based on actual TOT remitted by the hotel, not estimated amounts.

Subsidies in excess of $100,000 will require a public hearing and a detailed report as required by Government Code section 53083. Subsidies in excess of 1.75% of the project cost require that prevailing wages be paid.
616
Program Eligibility
This Program is applicable to hotels within the City limits that meet four or three star/diamond hotel ratings or higher, under rating criteria established by the American Automobile Association (AAA), JD Power and Associates, or comparable hotel rating entity.

Existing hotels are also eligible for the Program. Existing hotels must measurably improve the quality of the hotel through either increased capacity or ability to charge higher room rates and/or enhancements to the hotel’s ratings by AAA, JD Power and Associates, or comparable hotel rating entity.

Eligible hotels must have fifty (50) or more rooms and feature hotel operations on a 24 hour per day, 7 days per week basis. The hotel must offer, at a minimum, the following services:
housekeeping, food and beverage, room service, banquet and meeting services, concierge, bell service and parking.

Eligible hotels must provide independent, third party, certification acceptable to the City indicating the level of the quality of the hotel as four or three stars/diamond or higher on a yearly basis, during the incentive time period.

Program Financial Need:

As part of the application, a feasibility analysis must be completed by the applicant to demonstrate a funding gap between operating performance and project development or improvement cost. The analysis will be independently reviewed by a City consultant, and must prove that, but for this program, the development or improvement would not occur.

Program Limitations:
(1) The TOT rebate will be no more than five percent (5%) (i.e., half) of the ten percent (10%) TOT received by City from Operator for a fixed period of ten (10) years. City will fund the five percent (5%) TOT rebate to Operator with the two percent (2%) of the TOT used for economic development, plus three percent (3%) of the TOT deposited in the City’s general fund. Therefore, under this Rebate Incentive Program, the City will temporarily receive no less than five percent (5%) in TOT until the TOT Rebate Incentive Program Agreement expires.
(2) Renovated hotels are eligible to receive a TOT rebate of five percent (5%) of the increment above existing TOT levels for up to 10 years. (3) Any change in star rating below 3 stars for the applicant throughout the lifetime of the Agreement will result in termination of the Agreement.
(4) The hotel must receive a Certificate of Occupancy within 18 months of development plan approval to be eligible, unless the agreement includes another time frame. (5) The amount of the TOT rebate shall be no greater than the funding gap. (6) The applicant must enter into a binding agreement with the City prior to, or at the time of, development application approval.
(7) Estimated TOT revenues shall be based on revenue proforma from like hotel developments (i.e., franchise operator, similar or same brand) as documented in a report subject to the review and approval of the City Finance Director. Actual rebates will be based upon actual TOT remitted by the hotel, not estimated amounts. 617
Application Process:

Along with the formal development submittal, the applicant of the proposed hotel must submit a letter of request to Economic Development to participate in the program. The applicant must include the following as part of the application:
(1) Estimated total construction cost
(2) Project timeline
(3) Requested estimated taxes to be reimbursed (to be verified by Finance Department) (4) Third party certification of the development’s rating status (or proposed development) (5) Independent third-party feasibility analysis showing market demand for additional hotel rooms (at a four star or diamond level or higher) within City limits (6) Feasibility analysis demonstrating the need for an economic development subsidy (7) Pro-forma that includes:
a. Projected sales
b. Estimated sales tax revenues to be generated
c. Transient Occupancy Tax
d. Number of new jobs created with corresponding position titles and salary ranges for each position
After a letter is received by Economic Development, the City Manager’s office will schedule an Economic Development Subcommittee meeting to discuss the request from the applicant.

Economic Development will also give notice to the Director of Finance, Director of Community Development, and Project Manager regarding the request and the Subcommittee meeting.

If the reimbursement is recommended by the Subcommittee, Economic Development will coordinate with Project Manager in Planning regarding the scheduling of the Public Hearing and notify the applicant.

The Applicant must enter into a binding agreement with the City prior to, or at the time of, development application approval. Economic Development will coordinate with the City Attorney’s office for the creation of the TOT Rebate Incentive Agreement. Agreements must be approved no later than the time of project approval by the appropriate hearing body. If the project approval is only subject to Planning Commission approval, the application must be approved at City Council prior to Planning Commission approval.

Reimbursement
Actual rebates will be based upon actual TOT remitted by the hotel, NOT estimated amounts.

The City will rebate fifty percent (50%) of the actual TOT remitted to the applicant after the first full year of operation and annually thereafter until the term of the program ends, or the maximum rebate amount has been reached. The Finance Department will reconcile the TOT payments received from the applicant and create a check request with the appropriate amount to be reimbursed. Finance will issue a check to the applicant within 30 days of the closing of the twelfth full month of operation after Certificate of Operation is issued. 618
Hotel must provide an independent, third-party certification to the Department of Economic Development indicating the designation of the hotel (four- or three-star or diamond or higher) on a yearly basis, during the incentive time period.

Program applicants will follow all procedures required by Government Code § 53083; AB 562 (2013), including prevailing wage, public hearings and reporting requirements. 619

CITY OF ADELANTO

HOTEL TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX REBATE INCENTIVE AGREEMENT This Hotel Transient Occupancy Tax Rebate Incentive Agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into this ____ day of ____________, 20____, by and between the City of Adelanto (“City”) and ________________ (“Operator”). City and Operator are sometimes individually referred to as “Party” and collectively as “Parties.”

RECITALS
A. Operator has represented that it will operate a ______________ Hotel consisting of _______ rooms on a ______-acre site addressed as _____________________________ (“Hotel”).

The site is more precisely described on Attachment A, which is attached and incorporated by this reference (“Site”) and the Hotel is described further in the __________________ Plan, as amended in Planning Case # _______________, approved by the City Council on ______________, 20____, and in Resolution No. _____; and,
B. Operator anticipates that the Hotel will generate transient occupancy taxes (“TOT”) in the approximate amount of ____________________ Dollars during the first ten (10) years of the Hotel’s operation; and,
C. City is authorized to collect TOT from hotels and motels throughout the City pursuant to Ordinance No. 461, which established the City’s TOT and which was thereafter codified under Chapter 3.40 of the Adelanto Municipal Code, as well as Revenue and Taxation Code section 7280; and,
D. Pursuant to Section 3.40.030 of the Adelanto Municipal Code, City is authorized to impose a TOT on all hotel guests at a rate of ten percent (10%) charged to transient guests in hotels and motels located within City limits. (Muni. Code § 3.40.030 (A).) Of the ten percent (10%) levied, eight percent (8%) of the TOT is received and deposited into the City’s general fund for use in any manner deemed to benefit the City, and the remaining two percent (2%) is used for economic development activities of the City; and, E. Hotel will be required to collect the TOT and remit said tax to the City; and, F. On __________, 2022, City adopted a TOT Rebate Incentive Program (“Program”) (Ordinance No. _____) for the purpose of encouraging the development of new high-quality hotels and promote reinvestment in existing hotels in the City. Under this Program, the TOT rebate to Operator will be no more than five percent (5%) (i.e., half) of the ten percent (10%) TOT received by City from Operator for a fixed period of ten (10) years; and, 620
G. City will fund the five percent (5%) TOT rebate to Operator by combining two percent (2%) of the TOT used for economic development and three percent (3%) of the TOT deposited in the City’s general fund account; and,
H. Hotel is located within City limits and qualifies for incentives pursuant to the Program; and,
I. City wishes to provide Operator with economic incentives for the Hotel in order that the Hotel will increase the economic climate for businesses and citizens in the City, provide employment and other needed services, and generate TOT revenue in excess of amounts made available in the form of incentives.

AGREEMENT
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing Recitals and the following mutual covenants, agreements, conditions and representations, and for other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledge, the Parties agree as follows:

1. Term. This Agreement shall commence automatically on the date, which the City Council adopts a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute this Agreement and end no later than ten (10) years therefrom, as set forth below.

2. Incentive Payments. In exchange for the Operator’s covenants and commitments set forth in this Agreement, when the Hotel is built and operated on the Site and subject to the limitations herein, the City agrees to provide, on an annual basis, paid as set forth herein, economic incentive payments (“Incentive Payments”) to Operator for the reasons stated above.

3. Remittance of Incentive Payments.

A. Incentive Amount. The amount of remittance by City to Operator pursuant to this Agreement and the Program shall be as follows:
(1) An amount equal to fifty percent (50%) of the prior calendar year's TOT actually collected for the Hotel, and deposited by City into its general fund or used for economic development, based upon returns filed pursuant to Section 3.40.080 of the Adelanto Municipal Code or any successor code section shall be paid to Operator on an annual basis (“Incentive Payment”). The City shall retain 100% of TOT collections that exceed the yearly Incentive Payments shown in Attachment B, except that if the cumulative Incentive Payments have not reached the maximum amount of $_____________, or fifty percent (50%) of the TOT actually collected, by the end of year ten (10), the maximum Incentive Payment to the Hotel in year ten (10) shall be up to $_____________.
621
(2) Notwithstanding the foregoing, in no event shall the cumulative Incentive Payments exceed $______________, or fifty percent (50%) of the TOT actually collected.
(3) The first and last annual Incentive Payments shall be based upon the portion of the prior calendar year during which operations have commenced as defined and required in Section 7.

B. Manner of Remittance.
(1) Operator shall collect and remit to the City ten percent (10%) of the total room revenue levied on Hotel occupants on a calendar quarterly basis (“Hotel TOT”). Said remittance shall be made within thirty (30) days following the end of the calendar quarter. Upon receipt of the remittance, City shall have thirty (30) days to review and audit, at is own expense, all amounts so received.
(2) Of the ten percent (10%) remitted by Operator to the City in Hotel TOT, no more than five percent (5%) (i.e., half) of the Hotel TOT is eligible for rebate under this Program. City shall remit to Operator an amount equal to fifty percent (50%) of the Hotel TOT received by City. Specifically, City shall fund the five percent (5%) TOT rebate remittance to Operator as follows: two percent (2%) of the TOT used for economic development plus three percent (3%) of the TOT deposited in the City’s general fund account, during years one (1) through ten (10) of the Hotel’s operation, reviewed and approved pursuant to the provisions of this paragraph.
(3) In the event City does not remit the reimbursement within thirty (30) days of receipt of Hotel TOT from Operator, Operator shall be entitled to a ___ percent (___%) penalty plus ___ percent (___%) annual interest on any unpaid amount until the Hotel TOT is reimbursed. The penalty and interest shall be applied to the Operator’s share of TOT. A ten (10) day grace period shall be applied for unforeseen circumstances beyond the City’s control.

Examples may include bank or postal service error or extreme medical emergency on the part of individuals responsible for making the payment.
(4) In the event that the City increases the TOT rate, the amount of TOT eligible for Incentive Payments payable to Operator under this Agreement shall remain at five percent (5%) (i.e., half) of the Hotel TOT collected and remitted to the City by Operator. (5) In the event that the City decreases the TOT rate, the Incentive Amounts payable to the Operator shall be reduced accordingly on a pro rata basis. However, the total amount of the TOT to be remitted to Operator pursuant to this Agreement shall remain at ________________ Dollars, or ___ percent (__%) of the total construction cost of the Hotel. 622
(6) If Operator uses a third-party company to collect room revenues on behalf of the Operator, such third-party company shall levy TOT and remit the required portion to the City according to this Agreement. Operator shall require any third-party online booking services that collect room revenues on behalf of the Hotel to collect and remit Hotel TOT to the City in accordance with this Agreement.
(7) The Parties expressly acknowledge that this Agreement does not create a debt of the City to Operator, but rather an obligation to pay Incentive Payments only upon City’s receipt of Hotel TOT in accordance with the Adelanto Municipal Code and the terms of this Agreement.

C. Time of Remittance. The Incentive Payment shall be paid through a series of Annual Incentive Payments commencing on ___________ of the calendar year following the commencement of operations, until such time as the maximum amount set forth above has been paid. However, in no event shall any Annual Incentive Payments be made after the tenth (10th) anniversary of the first Incentive Payment.

D. Time Limits. If either Party fails to act pursuant to the timelines set forth in this Section, or the other Party wishes to challenge the action, the challenging Party shall provide written notification within sixty (60) days. Notice shall be mailed with the United States Mail, postage prepaid, certified mail, return receipt requested, and shall be considered received three (3) days after mailing. Failure to notify the other Party of the breach shall constitute a waiver of the breach and an inability to seek such payments under this Agreement.

4. Annual Audit. Operator agrees to provide a letter by February 1 of each year following implementation of this Agreement, signed by a certified public accountant attesting that all TOT revenues have been collected and submitted in accordance with the Adelanto Municipal Code and this Agreement.

5. Record Retention. Operator agrees to retain all unaudited Hotel financial records regarding Hotel’s revenues subject to TOT during the term of this Agreement plus five (5) years.

Operator agrees to make the Hotel’s financial records regarding revenues subject to TOT available to the City within thirty (30) days of a written request for auditing purposes. However, once records have been supplied or audited, Operator’s obligation to provide those records shall cease.

6. Conditions of Incentive Payments. Operator covenants and agrees for itself, its successors, assigns, and every successor in interest to the Site, as follows:

A. During the term of this Agreement, the Hotel shall maintain a four or three star/diamond or higher pursuant to AAA, JD Power and Associates, or comparable hotel rating entity. Hotel must provide independent, third party, certification acceptable to the City indicating the level of the quality of the hotel as four or three stars/diamond or higher on a yearly 623
basis, during the incentive time period. Any change in star rating below three stars for the Hotel throughout the lifetime of the Agreement will result in termination of the Agreement.

B. Operator must receive a Certificate of Occupancy within 18 months of development plan approval and the Hotel shall open for business in such a manner as to generate TOT no later than ______________, 20_____, and at all times during this Agreement shall operate the Hotel in a commercially reasonable and productive manner. City shall respond in a prompt and expeditious fashion to all permit submittals by Operator and any delay resulting from the City’s failure to respond in a prompt and expeditious fashion shall entitle Operator to request a commensurate extension of the commencement date set forth earlier in this Section. City shall not unreasonably withhold approval of any such request. Likewise, Operator may request an extension of the commencement date as a result of any delay caused by fire, strikes, or labor disputes, riot, war, acts of God, governmental orders or regulations or similar contingencies, which are beyond the control of Operator, and City shall not unreasonably withhold approval of any such request.

C. During the term of this Agreement, Operator covenants and agrees for itself, its successors, assigns, and every successor in interest to the Site or any part thereof, that the Operator shall maintain the Site and the Hotel to the curb line, in good condition conforming to all applicable local laws, and the violation of any such laws, whether or not civil or criminal action is commenced for such violation, shall be a breach of this Agreement. Operator shall keep the Site free from any accumulation of debris or waste materials. Operator shall maintain the landscaping required to be planted on the Site in a healthy condition in accordance with the approved landscape plan. The Site shall be maintained in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Adelanto Municipal Code. The foregoing covenants shall run with the land.

7. Compliance with Governmental Requirements. Operator shall carry out the operation of the Hotel in conformity with all Governmental Requirements. Upon the request of the City, the Operator shall certify to the City that it is in compliance with the requirements of this Section. “Governmental Requirements” means all laws, ordinances, statutes, codes, rules, regulations, orders and decrees of the United States, the State, the County, the City, or any other political subdivision in which the Site is located, and of any other political subdivision, agency or instrumentality exercising jurisdiction over the City, the Operator or the Site, including all applicable state labor standards, the City zoning and development standards, building, plumbing, mechanical and electrical codes, and all other provisions of the City’s Municipal Code, and all applicable disabled and handicapped access requirements, including without limitation the Americans With Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. Section 12101, et seq., Government Code Section 4450, et seq., Government Code Section 11135, et seq., and the Unruh Civil Rights Act, Civil Code Sections 51, et seq. If Applicable, Operator and its contractors and subcontractors shall comply with all governmental requirements applicable to public works, including without limitation the payment of prevailing wages in compliance with Labor Code Section 1770, et seq., keeping of all records required pursuant to Labor Code Section 1776, complying with the 624
maximum hour requirements of Labor Code Sections 1810 through 1815, and complying with all regulations and statutory requirements pertaining thereto.

8. Payment of Transient Occupancy Taxes. The specific and timely performance of all obligations of Operator to pay TOT pursuant to Chapter 3.40 of the Adelanto Municipal Code is a material part of this Agreement, and this Agreement shall not alter any provision of the Adelanto Municipal Code or the California Revenue and Taxation Code pertaining to TOT, and all such taxes shall be due and payable at all times according to law. Nothing in this Agreement shall relieve Operator of its obligations to file all returns and other reports in a timely manner, and to remit the full amount of TOT due and payable to the City pursuant to Chapter 3.40 the Adelanto Municipal Code. The failure of Operator to make all TOT payments lawfully due and payable under the applicable sections of the Adelanto Municipal Code shall render this Agreement null and void, provided that City shall have first given Operator written notice of such failure and 60 days opportunity to cure. Thereafter, in the event such failure has not been cured in full, City shall be under no obligation to make any further Incentive Payments.

9. Operator Tax Responsibility. Operator shall be responsible for any and all tax obligations and/or other Operator expenses associated with this Agreement.

10. Disclosures. Operator is informed and hereby acknowledges that the City is uncertain as to whether the benefits conferred by this Agreement create a public work for prevailing wage purposes, which, in turn, requires the payment of prevailing wages on the Hotel project. Operator expressly and affirmatively acknowledges that the City’s representation of uncertainty, as specifically set forth in this Agreement, is the sole and complete representation made by the City regarding the prevailing wage issue. Operator hereby acknowledges that Operator has been informed of the City’s uncertainty in this regard. Operator may wish to treat this Agreement as an event triggering the consequences attendant with a prevailing wage project to remove any uncertainty; Operator is encouraged to seek the advice of its own attorney(s) as to this issue, prior to the execution of this Agreement. Operator’s execution of this Agreement is an acknowledgment that such independent advice and counsel has been obtained.

11. Operator’s Indemnity. Operator shall indemnify the City, its elected officials, directors, officers, employees, volunteers, independent contractors, and agents from any and all claims, damages, penalties, losses, costs, expenses (including reasonable attorney’s fees and costs), injuries and liabilities of any kind or nature arising out of or caused by any of Operator’s negligence, gross negligence, or willful misconduct under this Agreement, whether such activities or performance thereof be by Operator or anyone directly or indirectly employed by or contracted with Operator and whether such damage shall accrue or be discovered before or after the commencement of operation of the Hotel, including but not limited to all claims that the benefits conferred by the City under this Agreement create a public work for prevailing wage purposes thereby requiring the payment of prevailing wages, and all claims challenging the legality, constitutionality or enforceability of this Agreement, including but not limited to the City’ authority to pay TOT Incentive Amounts.
625
Operator further agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend the City from any and all claims, damages, penalties, losses, costs, expenses (including reasonable attorney’s fees and costs), injuries and liabilities of any kind or nature, made against the City, its elected officials, directors, officers, employees, volunteers, independent contractors, and agents, arising from a claimed relationship of partnership or joint venture between the City and the Operator with respect to the development, operation, maintenance or management of the Site or the Hotel The City’s rights of indemnity, as expressly set forth in this Agreement, shall not depend upon the actual payment of any claim, damage, penalty, loss, cost, expense (including reasonable attorney’s fees and costs), injury or liability sustained by Operator and/or its contractors, subcontractors, agents and/or employees.

In the event that the City tenders the defense and indemnification of a claim contemplated by this Agreement to Operator and/or to his/her/its contractors, subcontractors, agents and/or employees, the City shall be entitled to actively supervise the claim and/or the defense of the same, shall be authorized to select and retain its own separate independent counsel, at Operator’s and/or to his/her/its contractors, subcontractors, agents and/or employees’ expense, as necessary, which decision shall be made solely and exclusively by the City, and the City must consent to the disposition of any such claim, including but not limited to, the settlement of any such claim.

12. Taxes and Assessments. At all times, the Operator shall pay prior to delinquency all ad valorem real estate taxes and assessments on the Hotel, subject to the Operator’s right to contest in good faith any such taxes. Operator shall remove or have removed any levy or attachment made on the Site or any part thereof with respect to real estate taxes and assessments on the Site accruing after the commencement of the Term, or assure the satisfaction thereof within a reasonable time. The Operator shall not apply for or receive any exemption from the payment of property taxes or assessments on any interest in or to the Site or the Hotel.

13. Relationship Between City and Operator. It is hereby acknowledged that the relationship between the City and the Operator is not that of a partnership or joint venture and that the City and the Operator shall not be deemed or construed for any purpose to be the agent of the other. Accordingly, except as expressly provided herein or in the Attachments hereto, the City shall have no rights, powers, duties or obligations with respect to the development, operation, maintenance or management of the Hotel. Operator agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend the City from any claim made against the City arising from a claimed relationship of partnership or joint venture between the City and the Operator with respect to the development, operation, maintenance or management of the Site or the Hotel.

14. City Approvals and Actions. City shall maintain authority of this Agreement and the authority to implement this Agreement through the City Manager (or his duly authorized representative). The City Manager shall have the administrative authority to make approvals, issue interpretations, waive provisions, and/or enter into amendments of this Agreement on behalf of the City so long as such actions do not materially or substantially change the uses or development 626
permitted on the Site, or add to the costs incurred or to be incurred by the City as specified herein, and such approvals, interpretations, waivers and/or amendments may include extensions of time to perform as specified in the Schedule of Performance. All other material and/or substantive interpretations, waivers, or amendments shall require the consideration, action and written consent of the City Council.

15. Restrictions on Transfer, Conveyance, Assignment of Hotel.

A. The qualifications and identity of the Operator are of particular concern to the City. It is because of those qualifications and identity that the City has entered into this Agreement with the Operator. Accordingly, commencing on the date of this Agreement and continuing until the end of the term, (i) no voluntary or involuntary successor in interest of the Operator shall acquire any rights or powers under this Agreement, (ii) Operator shall not make any total or partial sale, transfer, conveyance, assignment, subdivision, refinancing or lease of the whole or any part of the Site or the Hotel thereon, (collectively referred to herein as a “Transfer”), without the prior written approval of the City, except as expressly set forth herein. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, no transfer shall be permitted unless it is with respect to the entirety of the Hotel.

B. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement to the contrary, City approval of a Transfer shall not be required in connection with any of the following:
i. Any Transfer to an entity or entities in which Operator retains at least fifty-one percent (51%) of the ownership or beneficial interest and retains management and control of the transferee entity or entities.
ii. The conveyance or dedication of any portion of the Site to the City or other appropriate governmental agency, or the granting of easements or permits to facilitate the Hotel.
iii. Any requested assignment for financing purposes (subject to such financing being leasehold financing and considered and approved by the City pursuant to this Section).

C. City agrees that it will not unreasonably withhold approval of a request for approval of a Transfer made pursuant to this Section, provided the Operator delivers written notice to the City requesting such approval accompanied by evidence regarding the proposed transferee’s development and/or operational qualifications and experience, and its financial commitments and resources, in sufficient detail to enable the City to evaluate the proposed assignee or purchaser pursuant to the criteria set forth in this Section and as reasonably determined by the City. The City may, in considering any such request, take into consideration such factors as: (i) the quality of any proposed new and/or replacement operator, (ii) the proposed transferee’s past performance as operator of similar developments, (iii) the current financial condition of the proposed transferee, 627
and similar factors. City agrees not to unreasonably withhold its approval of any such requested Transfer, taking into consideration the foregoing factors. An assignment and assumption agreement in form reasonably satisfactory to the City Attorney shall also be required for all proposed Transfers. Within thirty (30) days after the receipt of the Operator’s written notice requesting City approval of a transfer pursuant to this Section, City shall either approve or disapprove such proposed assignment or shall respond in writing by stating what further information, if any, the City reasonably requires in order to determine the request complete and determine whether or not to grant the requested approval. Upon receipt of such a response, the Operator shall promptly furnish to the City such further information as may be reasonably requested.

16. Successors and Assigns. All of the terms, covenants and conditions of this Agreement shall be binding upon the Operator and its permitted successors and assigns. Whenever the term “Operator” is used in this Agreement, such term shall include any other permitted successors and assigns as herein provided.

17. Default.

A. Defaults. Any one or all of the following events shall constitute a default by Operator:
i. Any misleading statement, misrepresentation or warranty of Operator herein or in any other writing at any time furnished by Operator to City that materially harms the City or materially diminishes the benefit of the Agreement to the City; ii. Nonperformance, when due, of any of the obligations described herein, or failure to perform any obligation or covenant contained herein if noncompliance is not cured by Operator within 60 days after written notice of noncompliance is provided to Operator by the City;
iii. The filing by or against Operator of a petition for relief under the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 or any bankruptcy or debtor relief law; iv. A general assignment by Operator for the benefit of creditors or the appointment of any receiver or trustee of all or any portion of the assets of Operator; v. The transfer or assignment of this Agreement prior to opening the Hotel or commencing Hotel operations.

B. Remedies. Upon the occurrence of a default, the City, at its option, may declare this Agreement to be in default, and, in such event, the City shall have all of the rights and remedies prescribed at law or in equity. Following an event of default, the City shall have no further obligation to disburse all or any portion of the Incentive Payments. 628

18. Contingent on City Council’s Approval. Operator understands and acknowledges that this Agreement is subject to approval by the City Council of the City of Adelanto and that it cannot be fully performed by the City unless and until such approval has been duly and regularly made. The terms, conditions, and covenants as set forth herein are all made expressly contingent upon approval by the City Council. In the event this Agreement is not approved, neither Party shall be obligated to perform and is released and discharged by the other from any and all obligations hereunder.

19. Legal Advice. Each party represents and warrants to the other the following: they have carefully read this Agreement, and in signing this Agreement, they do so with full knowledge of any right which they may have; they have received independent legal advice from their respective legal counsel as to the matters set forth in this Agreement, or have knowingly chosen not to consult legal counsel as to the matters set forth in this Agreement; and, they have freely signed this Agreement without any reliance upon any agreement, promise, statement or representation by or on behalf of the other party, or their respective agents, employees, or attorneys, except as specifically set forth in this Agreement, and without duress or coercion, whether economic or otherwise.

20. Entire Agreement. This Agreement and its Attachments are the entire understanding of the parties, and there are no other terms or conditions, written or oral, controlling this matter. In the event of any conflict between this Agreement and any of its Attachments, the provisions of this Agreement must prevail. If the parties desire to amend this Agreement, the amendment must be executed by all parties in writing.

21. Severability. The invalidity in whole or in part of any provision of this Agreement will not void or affect the validity of any other provisions of this Agreement.

22. Amendment. This Agreement may not be altered or amended except in a writing signed by both Parties or their respective successor and assigns.

23. Choice of Law. This Agreement is governed by the laws of the State of California.

Venue for all actions arising from this Agreement must be exclusively in the state or federal courts located in San Bernardino County, California.

24. Notices. Any statements, communications or notices to be provided pursuant to this Agreement must be sent to the attention of the persons who have signed below. Each party agrees to promptly send notice of any changes of contact or other information to the other party, at the address first written above.

25. Non-Liability of Officials and Employees of the City. No elected official, directors, officers, employees, volunteers, independent contractors, or agents of the City or the City shall be personally liable hereunder, in the event of any default or breach by the City or for 629
any amount, which may become due to the Operator or its successors, or on any obligations under the terms of this Agreement.

26. Attorneys’ Fees. In any action between the parties to interpret, enforce, reform, modify, rescind, or otherwise in connection with any of the terms or provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in the action shall be entitled, in addition to damages, injunctive relief, or any other relief to which it might be entitled, reasonable costs and expenses including, without limitation, litigation costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties below are authorized to act on behalf of their organizations and have executed this Agreement as of the date set forth below.

DATED this ______ day of ______________, 20___.

CITY OF ADELANTO
By:

Jessie Flores
City Manager
[Name]
[Title]
ATTEST:

City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

City Attorney
630

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
DATE: May 25, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Jessie Flores, City Manager
BY: Brian D. Wolfe, Contract City Engineer
SUBJECT: Adopt Safe Routes to School Plan for Three Schools by Resolution.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

City Council adopt the Safe Routes to School Plan for Three Schools by Resolution.

BACKGROUND:

Beginning October 2018 the City of Adelanto partnered with the Local Governments Commission (LGC) and later Alta + Planning Group to propose a planning grant for a new safe routes to school project.

LGC and Alta provided technical assistance and two community organizations were consulted to prepare the grant application. Three schools were identified as needing a plan for transportation infrastructure and outreach; Victoria Magathan Elementary School, Donald F. Bradach Elementary School and Adelanto High School.

Adelanto was awarded the grant by Caltrans on May 17, 2019. Since that time LGC, Alta and two community groups; Healthy Adelanto and El Sol Education Center meet with community members to determine needs of pedestrian and bicyclists while accessing the subject schools. Various recommended improvements such as bike lanes, sidewalks and crosswalks are initiated within the Safe Routes to School Plan. All deliverables, including draft and final version of the plan have been submitted to Caltrans. A Resolution by the City is required per Caltrans for their project close-out.

Staff recommends City Council accept the final Safe Routes to School Plan for Three Schools by Resolution.

FISCAL IMPACT:

No further impact. Project is complete and Adelanto has already contributed it match fund obligation.

ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution 22-36
Safe Routes to School plan
631
RESOLUTION NO. 22-36

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

ADELANTO ADOPTING THE FINAL ADELANTO SAFE

ROUTES TO SCHOOL PLAN FOR THREE SCHOOLS
WHEREAS, the City of Adelanto was granted a Sustainable Communities Planning grant for certain transportation planning; and WHEREAS, the City of Adelanto (Adelanto) and the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) entered into an agreement for Caltrans to convey grant funds subject to duties and obligations of Adelanto; and WHEREAS, Adelanto obligation included, but was not limited to local match commitment, quarterly reports and deliverables; and
WHEREAS, Adelanto entered into agreements with consultants and non-profit organizations to engage citizens at-large to develop a Safe Route to School plan for three specific schools for purposes of improving school zone safety while increasing walking and bicycle riding to school; and
WHEREAS, the scope of work for meeting project objectives has been substantially completed within project budget and schedule; and WHEREAS, the draft Safe Route to School Plan was presented to Adelanto Planning Commission at their November 17, 2021 meeting and recommended for City Council acceptance.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Adelanto, State of California accepts the Adelanto Safe Routes to School Plan dated November 2021.

ADOPTED this 25th day of May, 2022.

Gabriel Reyes
Mayor
632

APPROVED
Marc Tran, City Attorney
By:

AYES: Councilmembers
NOES: Councilmembers
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers
NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers _

CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY
I, Brenda Lopez, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 22-36 to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of _________ on ______________, 2022.

Date:

Brenda Lopez
Clerk of the Council
City of Adelanto
633
Adelanto Safe Routes to School Plan
November 2021
634
ii

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

PUBLIC PARTICIPANTS
Thank you to the people of Adelanto who participated
in this planning process through public comment forms,
input maps, interviews, and meetings.

PROJECT TEAM
City of Adelanto
Local Government Commission
El Sol Neighborhood Educational Center
Healthy Adelanto
Alta Planning + Design
635

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2 Adelanto Today . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 3 Outreach + Engagement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 4 Improving Safe Routes to School in Adelanto . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 5 Encouraging Safe Routes to School in Adelanto . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 6 Implementing Safe Routes to School in Adelanto . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 636
1 1
Introduction
637
Adelanto SRTS Plan | Introduction
2 Introduction
The Adelanto Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Plan is a
partnership project of the City of Adelanto, the Local
Government Commission (LGC), El Sol Neighborhood
Education Center (El Sol), and Healthy Adelanto. The
City of Adelanto received funding from the California
Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Sustainable
Communities Planning Grant Program to develop the SRTS
Plan and review walking and biking conditions around the three project schools.

The SRTS Plan aims to improve walking and bicycling
conditions for students who attend Adelanto High School, Donald F. Bradach Elementary School, and Victoria
Magathan Elementary School. These three schools were
selected for this project based on their close proximity to each other, as well as their lack of infrastructure for students walking or bicycling to school as compared to
other schools in Adelanto.

Rising concern
about safety of
walking & biking
Increased tra c
at and around
school
More parents
driving children
to school
Fewer students
walking & biking
to school
KIDS WHO WALK OR BIKE TO SCHOOL:

THE VICIOUS CYCLE OF

INCREASED TRAFFIC LEADING

TO REDUCED WALKING
AND BICYCLING:
*More information, including primary sources, can be found at http://guide.saferoutesinfo.org

THE PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN WALKING

OR BIKING TO SCHOOL HAS DROPPED

PRECIPITOUSLY WITHIN ONE GENERATION

MOST KIDS ARE NOT GETTING

ENOUGH PHYSICAL ACTIVITY

ROADS NEAR SCHOOLS ARE

CONGESTED, DECREASING SAFETY

AND AIR QUALITY FOR CHILDREN
Arrive alert and able to
focus on school
Are more likely to be a healthy
body weight
Are less likely to suer from
depression and anxiety
Get most of the recommended 60
minutes of daily physical activity
during the trip to and from school
Demonstrate improved test scores
and better school performance*
48%
13%
1969 2009
Why Safe Routes to School?
638
3 to thrive – including school. Getting around via active modes of travel such as walking, biking, and using public transit also creates opportunities for physical activity, encourages social cohesion, and reduces contributions to climate change and air pollution.

SRTS best practice strategies are commonly referred to as the “6 Es” — Education, Encouragement, Engagement,
Equity, Engineering, and Evaluation. Each “E’ is meant
to remove barriers that prevent students from walking
and biking to school. SRTS is typically divided into two categories — infrastructure and non-Infrastructure.
• Infrastructure, also called engineering, seeks to
improve the physical built environment that makes
active modes of travel safe, convenient, and
comfortable. Infrastructure is an important part of
SRTS because it allows communities to design and
build sidewalks, paths, crossings, and streets that are safer for all users and more conducive for using active modes of transportation.
• Non-infrastructure, also called encouragement or
education, complements infrastructure by promoting
activities that make active modes of travel to school
more attractive, fun, and interesting while also
teaching skills to do so safely.

The City and the SRTS project team listened to school
staff, parents and caregivers, residents, and students
to understand mobility challenges around each
school. The SRTS Plan provides a background on SRTS,
existing conditions in Adelanto, details on the SRTS Plan development process, and SRTS recommendations for
each project school. Policy and funding opportunities
will support staff in seeking further funding and ways of implementing the specific recommendations in this Plan, to improve walking and bicycling conditions for Adelanto families.

What is Safe Routes to School?
Safe Routes to School (SRTS) is a strategy to improve
pedestrian and bicycle travel conditions around schools in order to increase opportunities for students and
their families to use active modes of transportation for the school commute. All students should have safe,
accessible, and convenient transportation options,
especially if their families do not own or have access to a car. Lack of access to a car should not limit a person’s access to opportunities and to the places they need
639
Adelanto SRTS Plan | Introduction
4 SRTS is a critical part of building healthier, safer, and more equitable communities. SRTS has myriad
benefits including:
• Improved safety for pedestrians
and bicyclists
• Reduced traffic congestion
• Improved air quality
• Improved health
• Improved academic
achievement
• Fundamental and lifelong
pedestrian skills learned
• Benefit to the local economy
• Better sense of community
• More transportation options for
everyone
• Strengthened family bonds
How to use this SRTS Plan
The SRTS Plan documents the activities, data collection, and analyses that resulted in infrastructure and noninfrastructure recommendations. Various stakeholders can use the SRTS Plan to identify the content that is important and relevant to them. The following are some examples:

Parents/Caregivers can use the SRTS Plan to understand
the conditions at their student’s school and to become
familiar with the suggested routes for walking and biking to school as well as the recommendations made.

Adelanto Elementary School District and Victor Valley
Union High School District can use the SRTS Plan
to develop programs that promote alternatives to
automobile trips to school. They can also use the findings in the SRTS Plan to obtain grant funding or achievement awards.

City of Adelanto Staff can use the SRTS Plan to identify issues and opportunities related to suggested routes
for walking and biking and to prioritize short-term and long-term infrastructure improvements. City staff can
use the SRTS Plan to work with County staff to coordinate improvements and develop an overall approach to
addressing access to school. Staff can also use the SRTS Plan to pursue SRTS funding opportunities.
640
5 2
Adelanto Today
641
Adelanto SRTS Plan | Adelanto Today
6 Adelanto Today
The City of Adelanto is located in the south-central
Mojave Desert, approximately 35 miles north of the
City of San Bernardino and approximately 60 miles
northeast of the City of Los Angeles. The nearest towns are Victorville and Apple Valley to the southeast. More than 85 percent of land in Adelanto is undeveloped.

Adelanto residents are employed in diverse industries, with the largest percent of the population, 20%, employed
in the educational, health and social services sectors.

The second most common employment sector is
manufacturing, with over 19.0% of the residents employed in this sector. Retail trade ranks third, with 12.4% of residents employed in retail.

The focus of the Adelanto SRTS Plan are three schools
located in the southern portion of Adelanto—Adelanto
High School, Donald F. Bradach Elementary, and Victoria Magathan Elementary. Figure 1 shows a map of these
schools. Enrollment at each school is approximately 480 students at Donald F. Bradach, 530 students at Victoria Magathan, and 2000 students at Adelanto High School.

While the focus of the SRTS Plan is the three project
schools mentioned above, it is important to understand
the entire context of the City of Adelanto as presented in this chapter.
642
7 VILLA ST

EL MIRAGE RD

HOLLY RD

ADELANTO RD

ASTER RD

MOUNTAIN VIEW RD

COLUSA RD

AUBURN AVE

CACTUS RD

POPPY RD

HOOK BLVD

LEE AVE

DESERT FLOWER RD

BEAVER RD

PEARMAIN ST

REDONDO RD HOLLY ST

VINTON RD

OTTER AVE

NEVADA RD

RHODE ISLAND ST

CALLEJA RD

BEAVER AVE

EMERALD RD

SIERRA RD

AMETHYST RD

MESA LINDA RD

N PERIMETER RD

EL PRIVELEGIO ST

SARATOGA ST

SANDSTONE RD

CALENDULA RD

LAUREL RD

PAMELA LN

LAUREL AVE

BADGER AVE

ST THERESA AVE

BARCELONA AVE

CLL JARO

QUAIL COVE PL

CALIHAN RD

RICHARDSON RD

DAISY RD

ASTER RD

HOLLY RD

EMERALD RD

LILAC RD

PEARMAIN ST

BARTLETT AVE

AIR BASE RD

LESSING AVE

RANCHO RD

YUCCA RD

COLUSA RD

ADELANTO ADELANTO

HIGH SCHOOL HIGH SCHOOL

DONALD F BRADACH DONALD F BRADACH

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

VICTORIA MAGATHAN VICTORIA MAGATHAN

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
City Boundaries
Park
Project School
Project Location

CITY OF ADELANTO, CA
02 1
Miles
Figure 1 Project Location Map
643
Adelanto SRTS Plan | Adelanto Today
8 ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN
The City of Adelanto adopted Adelanto in
Motion: An Active Transportation Plan (AT Plan) in
December 2020. The AT Plan established a new
commitment to walking and biking in Adelanto,
moving away from the auto-centric, inequitable
approach of the past and toward a sustainable,
multi-modal transportation system that serves all
residents, regardless of age, ability, identity, or
income.

The AT Plan was created through intensive
collaboration between various City departments,
an advisory committee, multiple community
organizations, and most importantly, our residents.

Using this feedback, data analytics, and best
practices, the AT Plan defined an ambitious
active transportation system and introduced
a comprehensive collection of programs and
policies.
644
9 MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME
The overall median household income in Adelanto
is $34,446, which is significantly lower than San
Bernardino County’s median household income of
$60,420. Households in the central part of the city
have the lowest median incomes, but all areas are
significantly below the County’s median household
income.

DEMOGRAPHICS
Adelanto is home to more than 32,000 residents,
according to 2017 American Community Survey
five-year estimates. Approximately 86% of Adelanto
residents identify as non-white. Census tracts’
populations can range from 76% people of color to
90%. Higher concentrations of non-white populations
are located within the eastern half of the city, where
most residences are located.

AGE
When compared to San Bernardino County’s
population, Adelanto is younger, with the majority
of residents between the ages of 0 and 39 years old.

This difference is also reflected in the median age for each geography, which in Adelanto is 27.5 years and
in San Bernardino County is 33.4 years. Conversely,
Adelanto has a much lower proportion of older adults
in the city than found in the county or state. Figure 2 shows the population of the city by age range.
645
Adelanto SRTS Plan | Adelanto Today
10 HEALTHY PLACES INDEX SCORES
To further understand existing conditions in Adelanto,
the project team conducted an assessment of
health and community conditions related to
active transportation using a customized score of
the California Healthy Places Index (HPI). Overall,
Adelanto has an HPI of 3.5 suggesting that Adelanto
experiences poorer conditions than almost every
other city in the state. Figure 2 shows the HPI scores
for the areas where the three project schools are
located, which are 1.0 for Adelanto High School, 9.0
for Donald F. Bradach Elementary School, and 12.0
for Victoria Magathan Elementary School. The table
below shows the scores relative to each other, and
the maximum score of 100.

HEALTHY PLACES INDEX
The HPI, which pools data from 2006 to 2018 depending
on the variable and data source, aggregates a collection of community characteristics that predict life expectancy and allows users to see how public health intersects with transportation, climate, and more. Characteristics included in the HPI score consist of social equity, healthcare access, economic, educational, housing, transportation, and
environmental factors such as air and water pollutants.

The HPI then generates a composite score based on 25
weighted variables and additional support layers that can be used to compare the relative health impacts of living in different locations throughout California, and later, inform and drive policy decisions. The higher the score, the healthier the community conditions are based on 25 community
characteristics. Places with HPI scores of 25.0 or lower are considered to be the least healthy places in California.

The HPI is another tool used in California’s Active
Transportation Program grant application program. A
census tract HPI score must be 25.0 or lower to qualify as a disadvantaged community and therefore, eligible for up to 10 additional points in the overall grant application. However, the HPI also offers subcategories and customizable scores that can be adjusted for targeted analyses. The tool allows for analysis at various geographic levels, including Census tracts, zip codes, census-designated places, cities, counties, and more.
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
100
City of Adelanto Adelanto High
School
Donald F.

Bradach
Victoria
Magathan
Healthy Places Index
Disadvantaged Community
646
11 VILLA ST

EL MIRAGE RD

HOLLY RD

ADELANTO RD

ASTER RD

MOUNTAIN VIEW RD

COLUSA RD

AUBURN AVE

CACTUS RD

POPPY RD

HOOK BLVD

LEE AVE

DESERT FLOWER RD

BEAVER RD

PEARMAIN ST

REDONDO RD HOLLY ST

VINTON RD

OTTER AVE

NEVADA RD

RHODE ISLAND ST

CALLEJA RD

BEAVER AVE

EMERALD RD

SIERRA RD

AMETHYST RD

MESA LINDA RD

N PERIMETER RD

EL PRIVELEGIO ST SARATOGA ST

SANDSTONE RD

CALENDULA RD

LAUREL RD

PAMELA LN

LAUREL AVE

BADGER AVE

ST THERESA AVE

BARCELONA AVE

CLL JARO

QUAIL COVE PL

CALIHAN RD

RICHARDSON RD

DAISY RD

ASTER RD

HOLLY RD

EMERALD RD

LILAC RD

PEARMAIN ST

BARTLETT AVE

AIR BASE RD

LESSING AVE

RANCHO RD

YUCCA RD

COLUSA RD
Victorville
1%
7%
33%
0%
0%
12%
7%
5%
35%
3%
9%
46%
28%
2%
4%
29% 23% 17% 15%

ADELANTO

HIGH SCHOOL

DONALD F BRADACH

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

VICTORIA MAGATHAN

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
0-20%
20-40%
40-60%
60-80%
80-100%
City Boundaries
Park
Project School

HEALTHY PLACES INDEX

CITY OF ADELANTO, CA
HPI Score
0 1 2
Miles
Figure 2 Adelanto Healthy Places Index Scores
647
Adelanto SRTS Plan | Adelanto Today
12 CALENVIROSCREEN
The California Office of Environmental Health Hazard
Assessment developed the CalEnviroScreen tool
to identify communities that are disproportionately
burdened by multiple sources of pollution. Areas with
a higher score experience a much higher pollution
burden than areas with lower scores. This is also a tool used in California’s Active Transportation Program grant application scoring. Just like the HPI, communities
that score in the most burdened 25% of the state are
considered to be disadvantaged and are eligible for up
to 10 additional points in the overall grant application scoring.

Figure 3 displays Adelanto’s CalEnviroScreen Scores.

Overall, the city has a high CalEnviroScreen score and
is considered to be a city that is burdened with multiple sources of pollution. Places with CalEnviro scores of

39.34% or more are considered to be the most burdened
with multiple sources of pollution. CalEnviro scores for the areas where the three project schools are located are
92% for Adelanto High School, 55% for Donald F. Bradach Elementary School, and 52% for Victoria Magathan
Elementary School.

Figure 3 Adelanto CalEnviroScreen Score
648
13 ADELANTO HIGH SCHOOL
Adelanto High School is located in the southern
portion of Adelanto, but the school is on San
Bernardino County owned land. The high school is
at the western end of Mojave Dr, which is the main
street used to access the campus. While Joshua Road
and Calendula Road border the campus on the east
and west, they are not through-roads. Many of the
more than 2,000 students, the majority of whom are
Adelanto city residents, access the school by walking
or biking through open desert lands for all or a portion of their trip to and from school.

As the campus is located on county land, there
is no development adjacent to the school which
presents access issues, debris/trash issues, and safety issues. Additionally, the lack of access points creates congestion on Mojave Dr. Families experience
dangerous driving behaviors including drivers failing
to stop or yield to pedestrians, obstructing the
roadway, and making illegal U-turns.

There were no collisions within a 1-mile radius of the
high school from 2014-2018.

Project Schools
The focus of the Adelanto SRTS Plan is Adelanto High
School, Donald F. Bradach Elementary, and Victoria
Magathan Elementary. Below are additional analyses
of the existing conditions for these schools including
school specific statistics, collision history, and physical conditions for each of the three schools.
649
Adelanto SRTS Plan | Adelanto Today
14 The existing conditions map, Figure 4, shows the
evaluation of a 1-mile radius around the school focusing on elements of the walking and bicycling environment,
including:
• Sidewalk Conditions
• Bicycle Infrastructure
• Stop Signs
• Bus Stops
• Curb Ramps
• Signalized Intersections
• Drop-off Locations
Key Findings:
• Overall lack of sidewalks creating discontinuous
pedestrian networks
• No bicycle facilities, signage, or striping
• Lack of pedestrian lighting
• Needed crossing improvements
• Located on County San Bernardino jurisdiction, not in Adelanto city limits
• Debris/trash in area adjacent to campus
• Vehicles speeds are high on Mojave Drive making it
uncomfortable for students walking or biking
• Lack of shade
650
15 Victorville

HOLLY RD

ASTER RD

VILLA ST

CACTUS RD

DAISY RD

LUPIN RD

VICTOR ST

MOJAVE DR

POPPY RD

BELLFLOWER ST

SENECA RD

LILAC RD

LABP & L RD

MOJAVE ST

LA PAZ ST

MESQUITE RD

VERBENA RD

PEARMAIN ST

MONTA VISTA RD

KOALA RD

JONATHON RD

STAR ST

CABRILLO ST

JOSHUA RD

PANSY RD

FREMONTIA AVE

BEGONIA RD

JONATHAN ST

DELICIOUS ST

DUNES DR

CALENDULA ST

JOSHUA ST

COMMERCE WAY

CORNELL ST

ZENDA ST

CALIENTE RD
IVY ST

MUSKRAT AVE

PANTHER AVE

SPRING ST

MESQUITE AVE

THORNDALE ST

ADELANTO RD

WINTER PL

PALM ST

RACCOON AVE

BONANZA RD

CALENDULA RD

RACHEL CT

FREMONTIA RD

STEVEN RD

ALEXANDRIA ST

MONTEZUMA ST

DAHLIA DR

DESERT ROSE DR

ACACIA RD

OTTER AVE

ARCADIAN ST

GOLDEN ST

CLIFFROSE CT

PAMELA LN

SAVANNA ST

ADDISON ST

CARRILLO ST

COLERIDGE ST

NICOLES WAY

CHESTNUT ST

FREMONT DR

TAYLOR ST

SUTTER WAY
BO CT

CAROLINE ST

EVEREST ST

TAMARISK RD

JEREMIAH ST

ROSEDALE DR SHERMAN WAY

MAVERICK DR

MCVAY LN

WILLOW LN

CAMBRIDGE ST

RUSSET PL

JUSTINE WAY PALMYRA ST JONATHON ST

DAWN ST

WAKEFIELD ST

IRIS ST

SANDSTONE ST

DANIELLE DR

WALLFLOWER CT

ARLINGTON ST

HORIZON WAY

DESERT GLEN ST

STOCKTON ST

VIRGINIA ST

TOLLIVER ST

PEMBERTON ST

KEARNY DR

PERSHING ST

RAINIER ST

OXFORD ST

COVE CT

PALO VERDE ST

LABP PL RD

MARSHAL RD

BLUFF CT

BARKER RD

ALAN ST

DRAGON TREE DR

BILTMORE ST

HICKORY ST

DOVE LN

ALTON PL

GAINES CT

DESERT ST

WESTBROOK DR

PLAINFIELD ST

BLUE MESA AVE

JESSICA WAY

COLERIDGE RD

CHESTERFIELD ST

GREENE CT

BASALT ST

ENGLISH CT

WOLCOTT ST

ALLISON ST

SUMMER ST

BELLEVUE ST

LIVE OAK LN

RADFORD AVE

SNAPDRAGON LN

MOSS CREEK CT

COSTELLO DR

BRANCH CT

MOORFIELD CIR

ROSE CT

TEAKWOOD WAY

CLEMSON CT

SAWTOOTH CT

VICTOR ST

LA PAZ ST

CACTUS RD

PANSY RD

SENECA RD

DELICIOUS ST

MUSKRAT AVE

CACTUS RD

WAKEFIELD ST

BONANZA RD

JOSHUA RD

JOSHUA ST

MOJAVE ST

LUPIN RD

LABP & L RD

PAMELA LN

VERBENA RD

PEARMAIN ST

POPPY RD

MOJAVE DR

JOSHUA ST

BONANZA RD

KOALA RD

ADELANTO

HIGH SCHOOL
0 1,250 2,500
Feet
Sidewalk
Missing Sidewalk
Stop Sign
Curb Ramp
Bus Stop
Drop Off/Pick Up
City Boundary
School

ADELANTO HIGH SCHOOL
Existing Conditions
Figure 4 Adelanto High School Existing Conditions
651
Adelanto SRTS Plan | Adelanto Today
16 DONALD F. BRADACH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Donald F. Bradach Elementary School is located in
the southern portion of Adelanto, but the school
is on San Bernardino County land. The school is at
the intersection of Bellflower Street and Lupin Road.

Bellflower Street is the main street used to access
the school and is the only paved road leading to
the school. In 2019-20, the school population was
431 students, the majority of whom are Adelanto
city residents. Bellflower Street is a high-speed road
with very limited pedestrian facilities and no bicycle
facilities.

Due to the age of students and the lack of highquality bicycle and pedestrian facilities, the primary way parents currently pick-up/drop-off students is
by driving. This creates some congestion issues on
Bellflower Street. While congestion occurs near the
school campus, the other segments of Bellflower that
lead to school have high vehicular speeds and lack
crossing facilities, making it uncomfortable and feel
unsafe for families to walk or bike to school.

There was one collision in December of 2014 on Bellflower Street. The collision occurred midday and the victim was an elderly pedestrian who sustained a minor injury. The cited reason was unsafe speed. This section of roadway
has limited off-street walking facilities. There are only partial sidewalks on the westside of the street.

The Existing Conditions map, Figure 5, shows the
evaluation of a 1-mile radius around the school focusing on the same elements as the Existing Conditions Adelanto High School map, Figure 4.

Key Findings:
• Overall lack of sidewalks limit pedestrian access
• A sidewalk present on the westside of Bellflower Street provides access to the school, but it is limited with no sidewalk north of the school
• Curb ramps directly in front of the school where limited sidewalks are present
• No bicycle facilities, signage, or striping
• Crossing improvements are needed along Bellflower
Street
• Located on County San Bernardino jurisdiction, not in Adelanto city limits
652
17 Victorville

HOLLY RD

DAISY RD

ASTER RD

VICTOR ST

LUPIN RD

CACTUS RD

POPPY RD

VILLA STLILAC RD

BELLFLOWER ST

VERBENA RD

STAR ST

JOSHUA RD

FREMONTIA AVE

JONATHAN ST

JOSHUA ST

CALIENTE RD

DELICIOUS ST

HOLLY ST

SPRING ST

RICHMOND AVE

ADELANTO RD

BONANZA RD

FREMONTIA RD

ALEXANDRIA ST

MONTEZUMA ST

REIMAN ST

SUTTER WAY

ROSEDALE DR

RUSSET PL

CHRISTOPHER ST

JONATHON ST

DAWN ST

WAKEFIELD ST

ARLINGTON ST

STOCKTON ST

VIRGINIA ST

PEMBERTON ST

HOOK BLVD

MARSHAL RD

LASSEN RD

FLOWER ST

BELLEVUE ST

KINGFORD AVE

ARLINGTON ST

LA PAZ ST

MOJAVE DR

PANSY RD

POPPY RD

VICTOR ST

MONTA VISTA RD

STAR ST

VERBENA RD

CACTUS RD

JOSHUA ST

MOJAVE ST

JOSHUA RD

PANSY RD PANSY RD
DONALD F.

BRADACH

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
395
395
0 750 1,500
Feet
Sidewalk
Missing Sidewalk
Stop Sign
Signalized Intersection
Curb Ramp
Bus Stop
Drop Off/Pick Up
City Boundary
School
DONALD F. BRADACH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Existing Conditions - 1 Mile Buffer
Figure 5 Donald F. Bradach Elementary School Existing Conditions 653
Adelanto SRTS Plan | Adelanto Today
18 VICTORIA MAGATHAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Victoria Magathan Elementary School is located in
the southern portion of Adelanto and is located within
the city itself, making it the only project school that is not on county land. While the school is in the city, it is adjacent to county land, so there is still a lack of overall development. The school is located at the
intersection of Holly Road and Delicious Street with the main entrance on Holly Road. Bellflower Street is still the main street that parents/caregivers take to access
Holly Road and the campus. In 2019-20, the school
population was 533 students.

There was one collision in January of 2014. The
collision occurred midday at the intersection of
Fremont Ave and Holly Road. The victim was an adult
pedestrian who sustained an injury, but it was not
severe.

The Existing Conditions map, Figure 6, shows the
evaluation of a 1-mile radius around the school.

Key Findings:
• Overall lack of sidewalks creating discontinuous
pedestrian networks
• No bicycle facilities, signage, or striping
• Lack of designated intersection crossings to provide
access from existing community to the south
• Adjacent to county land, which remains undeveloped
654
19 Victorville

HOLLY RD

DAISY RD

MOJAVE DR

LUPIN RD

ASTER RD

POPPY RD

LILAC RD

VERBENA RD

CACTUS RD

BELLFLOWER ST

MONTA VISTA RD

ADELANTO RD

PEARMAIN ST

PANSY RD

CASSIA RD

PRIMROSE RD

FREMONTIA AVE

HOLLY ST

RANCHO RD

JONATHAN ST

CASSIA ST

PRIMROSE ST

EL DORADO ST

JOSHUA RD

MONTEZUMA ST

HERMOSA RD

IRIS AVE

SIERRA AVE REDONDO RD

EL DORADO AVE

FREMONT DR

SUTTER WAY MAVERICK DR

POWER LINE RD

JONATHON ST

MESA LINDA RD

DESERT GLEN ST

MARSHAL RD

STADIUM RD

PALM AVE

COLERIDGE RD

PAMELA LN

MONTEZUMA ST

PANSY RD

MOJAVE DR

POPPY RD

RANCHO RD

DELICIOUS ST

CACTUS RD

FREMONTIA RD

PANSY RD

PRIMROSE RD

PANSY RD

CASSIA RD

JONATHAN ST

HERMOSA RD

LILAC RD
395
395

VICTORIA MAGATHAN

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Sidewalk
Missing Sidewalk
Stop Sign
Signalized Intersection
Curb Ramp
Bus Stop
Drop Off/Pick Up
City Boundary
School

VICTORIA MAGATHAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Existing Conditions
0 750 1,500
Feet
Figure 6 Victoria Magathan Elementary School Existing Conditions 655
Adelanto SRTS Plan | Adelanto Today
20 Key Takeaways
Adelanto city controlled-land and county controlledland in this area are still not fully developed, which means the schools are isolated from other land uses
and there are few paved roads that have direct
access to each campus. The roadways used to
access the three schools, Mojave Drive and Bellflower
Street, experience high vehicle speeds and traffic,
which make them unsafe and uncomfortable for
students and their families to walk or bike to school.

The existing conditions at all three campuses show
there are opportunities for improvement with the most
important issues being:
• Lack of continuous sidewalks
• County and City land is undeveloped
• Lack of bicycle facilities
• Need to improve intersections to help students and
families feel safer when crossing the street
• Vehicle speeds are high on school-access
roadways
The project recommendations in Chapter 4 and the
program and policy recommendations in Chapter 5
will work in tandem to help address the challenges that students face when trying to walk or bike to school.

These improvements are tailored to support the needs of students, some of the most vulnerable users, and to ensure that users of all ages and abilities can feel comfortable and confident while using them to get to and from school. 656
21 3
Outreach & Engagement
657
Adelanto SRTS Plan | Outreach & Engagement
22 Outreach & Engagement
The most important work done during any planning
process is outreach and engaging with stakeholders,
in order to develop a final plan that addresses their
priorities. The COVID-19 pandemic caused significant
challenges to “business as usual”, including limiting
how the project team was able to effectively engage
with project stakeholders. Therefore, the team made
several modifications to the outreach approach to
accommodate social distancing while still collecting
meaningful information from stakeholders. This chapter
provides a summary of this approach as well as the
stakeholder feedback that was used to inform the final
SRTS Plan.
658
23 VIRTUAL ENGAGEMENT
The project team coordinated with City staff to create
an online presence for the Adelanto SRTS Plan via a
standalone webpage on the City’s website (https://www.
ci.adelanto.ca.us/394/Adelanto-Safe-Routesto-SchoolPlan) to provide project information and solicit input. In addition, project team organizations, El Sol and Healthy Adelanto, promoted the project and opportunities for
input via their own virtual platforms.

ADELANTO SRTS PLAN ADVISORY GROUP
A SRTS Plan Advisory Group was established early on to
serve as a guiding body for the SRTS Plan development
process. Participants included representatives from:
• City of Adelanto
• Local Government Commission
• El Sol Neighborhood Center
• Healthy Adelanto
• Adelanto Elementary School District
• Victor Valley Union High School District
• Adelanto Coalition
• Adelanto High School
• Donald F. Bradach Elementary School
• Victoria Magathan Elementary School
• High Desert Outreach Center
• Office of Assemblyman Jay Abernolte
• San Bernardino County Schools Superintendent
• Victor Valley Transit Authority
The SRTS Plan Advisory Group met via video-conferencing three times over the course of the project. Each meeting gave participants an opportunity to learn about project activities, review and provide feedback on project
deliverables, and inform project priorities. The SRTS Advisory Group helped the project team effectively communicate
with project schools, identify priority corridors for additional review, and keep project activities on schedule.
659
Adelanto SRTS Plan | Outreach & Engagement
24 SCHOOL OBSERVATIONS AND WALK AUDIT
The project team conducted walk audits around each of
the project schools on October 26, 2020. The purpose of these observations was to understand school circulation patterns and identify barriers to walking and biking, and document unsafe behaviors. The project team was not
able to observe school drop-off or pick-up because
students were not attending school on-campus due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Instead, the project team relied on
participation from school staff to share information about traffic concerns during school drop-off and pick-up.

To supplant information collected during the walk
audits, an English/Spanish web-based mapping
tool was created and promoted via each school’s
communication channels and on the City of Adelanto’s
SRTS Plan webpage. The web-based mapping tool invited
respondents to “pin” locations on the map and write the issues or concerns for the marked location. The results of the mapping tool show that the majority of respondents
(50%) were most concerned about street crossings and
intersections near schools.

Walk audit participants note traffic concerns near a school in Adelanto. 660
25 STUDENT TALLIES AND PARENT SURVEYS
The project team intended to use the standard Student
Travel Tally form developed by the National Center for
SRTS to collect student travel modes at all project schools, once at the beginning of the project and once at the
end; however, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, student
travel tally data was not collected during the 2020-2021 school year.

Parents/guardians’ knowledge and attitudes about their
student’s travel habits, including walking and biking
to school were collected via an online questionnaire
sent to parents/caregivers at project schools and from
hardcopies distributed during student lunch pick up
times at the schools. Please note: survey questions
were framed as “pre-pandemic” or “post-pandemic”
and were not intended to collect information about
COVID-19 quarantine conditions. Forty-five people, with representation from all three project schools, completed the survey. The survey asked parents/caregivers how their student currently travels to and from school, the distance their family lives from school, challenges associated with walking and biking, and their overall attitudes toward
active modes of transportation.
• More than 70% of responding parents/caregivers
shared that “stranger danger” is a main reason they
do not allow their student to bike and walk to/from
school.
• A close second with slightly less than 70% of
respondents were lack of sidewalks, lack of bikeways,
unsafe intersections, and no Crossing Guards. The data
also showed that the vast majority of students arrived
and departed school via a family vehicle.

Tire marks indicate dangerous driving behavior near Adelanto schools. 661
Adelanto SRTS Plan | Outreach & Engagement
26 Figure 7 Parent Surveys (Top 5 Responses)

60.00% 65.00% 70.00% 75.00%
Lack of sidewalks and/or paths
Lack of bikeways
Unsafe intersections
No crossing guards
Stranger danger
Which concerns influence your decision
to NOT allow your child(ren) to walk or
bike to/from school?
662
27 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
Listening Sessions
In August 2020, four online listening sessions were
held in English and Spanish with parents and school
representatives from each of the schools. These sessions were held to help the team identify residents and school staff that were interested in Safe Routes to School and active transportation. The team educated attendees
about the project, the elements of SRTS, and identified problem areas providing the greatest challenges.

Student Engagement
Due to restrictions related to the COVID-19 pandemic,
the team was not able to hold in-person activities with students as desired. Through the help of the principals and teachers, several high school students participated in a mapping activity to identify their challenges in getting to and from the high school. They used the project’s online mapping tool to place pins at locations and provide their comments.

Two online workshops were held for all three schools
663
Adelanto SRTS Plan | Outreach & Engagement
28 School Workshops
Two online workshops were held for all three schools:
the English version on November 10, 2020 and
a Spanish version on November 12, 2020. These
workshops offered attendees the opportunity to
learn more about the SRTS Plan development process
and the benefits of SRTS projects and programs.

Participants were engaged through the use of polls
throughout each workshop to engage community
members, parents and caregivers, and school staff
about the challenges and opportunities with walking
and biking to and from school. While many parents
acknowledged they used cars to get their children to
and from school, they also indicated that they would
be more willing to organize and utilize walking school
buses and were open to letting their kids walk to and
from school if there were more comfortable sidewalks
and safer crossings available.

Popup Activities
The project team also hosted pop-up booths at three.

Booth attendees marked-up large aerial maps, which
included all project school locations and the preliminary project recommendations developed based on
previous community feedback. Each pop-up booth had
bilingual English/Spanish staff who facilitated the input and provided information about the SRTS Plan project.

These activities offered the team an opportunity to test whether they were on the right track with proposed
recommendations, and captured what the community
desired to see.
664
29 Improving Safe Routes
to School in Adelanto
4 665
Adelanto SRTS Plan | Improving Safe Routes to School in Adelanto 30 Improving Safe Routes to School in
Adelanto
This chapter introduces the bicycle and pedestrian
project recommendation for Adelanto High School,
Donald F. Bradach Elementary, and Victoria Magathan
Elementary. The City, working with these three schools and the County of San Bernardino, intends to identify funding and resources to implement these projects in the coming years to improve access and safety.

The following infrastructure recommendations are
considered planning-level meaning they will be used as a guide when implementing projects. In some cases, traffic impact analysis and more detailed design analysis will be required to evaluate specific site conditions and develop designs that reflect conditions and constraints.
666
31 How were these project
recommendations developed?
Developing recommendations is a multi-step process that requires understanding existing conditions, community
feedback, and project feasibility, among many other
factors. The community was able to provide firsthand
accounts of issues and challenges with accessing the
schools as well as what they wanted to see improved
moving forward. The project team reviewed and
analyzed all of these components to develop a
comprehensive approach to improve safety and active
transportation access to all three schools. As this is a SRTS project, the team developed projects that are meant
to support active transportation for students of all ages and abilities, to help create an active transportation
environment that is safe and inviting to help encourage and facilitate walking and biking to and from school.
667
Adelanto SRTS Plan | Improving Safe Routes to School in Adelanto 32 Design Toolkit
The elements that follow can be applied in combination
with one another to make walking, biking, taking transit, and driving more intuitive, safe, accessible, and enjoyable for all.

HAWK SIGNALS
A High-Intensity Activated Crosswalk Beacon (HAWK),
remains dark until activated by pressing the crossing
button. Once activated, the signal responds immediately with a flashing yellow pattern which transitions to a solid red light, providing unequivocal ‘stop’ guidance to
motorists. HAWK signals have been shown to elicit high
rates of motorist compliance.

RRFB SIGNALS
Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons
(RRFBs) are user-actuated warning beacons that
supplement pedestrian warning signs at unsignalized
intersections or mid-block crossings. RRFBs have also been shown to increase motor vehicle yielding compliance at
crossings of multi-lane or high-volume roadways. RRFBs
should be paired with a marked crosswalk, advanced
yield pavement markings, and push buttons allowing
pedestrians and bicyclists to activate the RRFBs.

HAWK Signal
RRFB Signal
668
33 HIGH-VISIBILITY CROSSWALK
High-visibility markings include ladder-style crosswalks, which include transverse lines in addition to bold bars across the crosswalk. These markings are more noticeable to drivers and are typically used where there is existing or anticipated high walking activity, where slower
walkers are expected (near schools and senior centers), at uncontrolled crossings, and where high numbers of
pedestrian related crashes have occurred. In school
areas, the crosswalks are yellow whereas outside school areas the crosswalks are white. In school areas, advance warning signage is recommended, particularly for school crosswalks. Crosswalks can be combined with curb
extensions to narrow crossing distances.

SIDEWALKS
Sidewalks are the most fundamental element of a
pedestrian network, as they provide an areas for
pedestrian travel separated from vehicle traffic. A typical sidewalk is paved, provides a minimum 5’ clear zone for pedestrians, and integrates a space for planting, street furniture, and transit stops.

High-Visibility Crosswalk
Sidewalk
669
Adelanto SRTS Plan | Improving Safe Routes to School in Adelanto 34 CURB EXTENSIONS
Curb extensions shorten pedestrian crossing distance,
increase visibility, and encourage turning vehicles to slow down. They can be used at any marked crossing where
the parking lane can absorb the extension of the curb.

MEDIAN REFUGE ISLANDS
Median refuge islands are protected spaces placed in the center of the street to facilitate bicycle and pedestrian crossings. Crossings of two-way streets are simplified by allowing bicyclists and pedestrians to navigate only one direction of traffic at a time. This treatment is most useful on high-volume multi-lane roadways that otherwise would be difficult to cross. Recommended minimum width for
pedestrian refuge islands is 6 feet.

CURB RAMPS
Curb ramps are required by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) at all crosswalks, including those that are
unmarked. They allow users of all abilities to transition from the street to the sidewalk.

Curb Extension
Median Refuge Island
Curb Ramp
670
35 PEDESTRIAN SCALE LIGHTING
Appropriately scaled street lighting provides a safer, more visible, and more inviting environment for all roadway
users. Pairing pedestrian-scaled street lighting with other improvements, such as street trees, helps alert motorists to the potential presence of pedestrians and bicyclists.

WAYFINDING AND SIGNAGE
Human-scale, versus vehicular-scale, wayfinding and
signage can make it easier to utilize walking and biking as a primary mode of transportation. Key destinations, such as parks, schools, and shopping areas are often included in a city’s wayfinding plan.

LEADING PEDESTRIAN INTERVALS
The leading pedestrian interval (LPI) gives pedestrians a walk signal a few seconds before motorists receive
a green light, which makes pedestrians more visible to
motorists making right turns.

BIKE BOXES
Bike boxes designate an area for bicyclists to queue
in front of automobiles, but behind the crosswalk, at
signalized intersections. These designs increase visibility and reduce vehicle incursion into crosswalks. Bike boxes also provide priority for cyclists when the light turns green and are helpful at facilitating left turns for cyclists.

BIKE PARKING
Adequate bike parking is in a secure place near desired destinations in visible, well-situated locations. Bicycle racks for short-term parking are relatively inexpensive and can be installed in unused space along building frontages, in furniture zones on sidewalks, or in underutilized parking spaces (often called a ‘bike corral’).

Bike corral parking
671
Adelanto SRTS Plan | Improving Safe Routes to School in Adelanto 36 Pedestrian scale lighting Wayfinding
Bike box
Leading pedestrian interval
672
37 SHARED-USE PATH (CLASS I)
Class I bikeways are completely separated from motor
vehicle traffic. These paths are typically located
immediately adjacent and parallel to a roadway, or on
its own independent right-of-way, such as within a park or along a body of water. Class I paths are comfortable for people of all ages and abilities.

Class I shared-use path

BIKE LANES (CLASS II)
Bike lanes are designated exclusively for bicycle use and are demarcated with pavement markings and signage.

They are located on the roadway directly adjacent to
motor vehicle travel lanes and follow the same direction as motor vehicles. Bike lanes provide visual separation from motor vehicles, which helps bicyclists and motorists anticipate on another’s movements and behaviors.

The optimal width of a bike lane is 6-feet. The minimum preferred width is 5-feet.

Class II bike lane
673
Adelanto SRTS Plan | Improving Safe Routes to School in Adelanto 38 BIKE ROUTE (CLASS III)
Class III bikeways are designated bicycle routes where
bicyclists and cars operate within the same travel lane, either side by side or in single file depending on roadway configuration. These facilities are best suited for local roads with low speeds and low traffic volumes. Shared
roadway treatments can include various forms of signage and shared lane markings that delineate a roadway as
a bicycle route and indicating that drivers must share the road and/or allow bicyclists to occupy the entire lane of travel.

Class III bike route

SEPARATED BIKEWAY (CLASS IV)
A separated bike lane combines the user experience of
a separated path with the on-street infrastructure of a conventional bike lane. A separated bike lane is physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and distinct from
the sidewalk. Separated bike lanes may be directional
(i.e., one-way) or bidirectional (i.e., two-way) and may be at street level, sidewalk level, or at an intermediate level. If at sidewalk level, a curb or median separates the facility from motor traffic, while different pavement color/ texture separates the facility from the sidewalk. If at street level, they can be separated from motor traffic by raised medians, on-street parking, or flexible delineators.

Class IV separated bikeway
674
39 Recommendations

ADELANTO HIGH SCHOOL
Recommendations for Adelanto High School focus on the school, as well as the Mojave Drive corridor, which is the main access road for the school. Recommendations include shared use paths that will create a continuous and separated facility from vehicular traffic to improve safety for high school students walking and biking to school. Additionally, pedestrian-scale lighting is included to accommodate students who are on campus later and for night time sports events. Combined recommendations maps for all three schools can be found in Appendix B.

Adelanto High School students walking to school.
675
Adelanto SRTS Plan | Improving Safe Routes to School in Adelanto 40 MATCH LINE

ADELANTO HIGH SCHOOL
Joshua Rd
Calendula St
Mojave Dr
1 2
3 3
4 5
Adelanto High School Recommendations
Formalize pick-up and drop-off with signage and curb markings Install 10 foot sidewalk on south side of Mojave Dr. from Calendula St to Daisy Rd Install high-visibility crosswalk with ADA curb ramps with detectable warning surface Install bicycle parking on campus
Install pedestrian scale lighting along Joshua Rd
I
1 2
4 Install traffic circle at Mojave Dr. and Calendula St. 3 5
6 Intall ADA curb ramps with detectable warning surface 7 Install 12 foot shared-use path along the north side of Mojave Dr from Joshua Rd to Bellflower St Install high-visibility crosswalk at Mojave Dr. and Joshua Rd. (3 legs) Install bulb-out at Mojave Dr and Josua Rd.

Install landscaping along north side of Mojave Dr between shared-use path and road 0 100 200 Feet
7 8
8 9
10 11
12 6
Recomendaciones para la preparatoria de Adelanto
Formalizar las áreas para dejar y recoger estudiantes con señalizacion y marcas en la banqueta IInstalar un paso peatonal de alta visibilidad con rampas peatonales con superficies podotáctiles de acuerdo con la ADA Instalar una banqueta de 10 pies en el lado sur de Mojave Dr de Calendula St to Daisy Rd Instalar estacionamiento para bicicletas en la entrada de la escuela Instalar un alumbrado público peatonal a lo largo de Joshua Rd. 1 2
4 Instalar una glorieta en Mojave Dr. y Calendula St.
3 5
6 Instalar rampas peatonales con superficies podotáctiles de acuerdo con la ADA 7 Instalar un camino de uso compartido de 12 pies a lo largo del lado norte de Mojave Dr de Joshua Rd to Bellflower St Instalar un paso peatonal de alta visibilidad en Mojave Dr. y Joshua Rd. (3 tramos) Instalar extensiones de acera en Mojave Dr. y Joshua Rd.

Instalar jardines en el lado norte de Mojave Dr. entre el camino de uso compartido y la carretera 8 9
10 9
10 11
12 12
Install pedestrian scale lighting along Mojave Dr.

Instalar alumbrado público peatonal a lo largo de Mojave Dr. 65’
10’
65’
50’
12’
5’
10’
11 12
5 Figure 8 Adelanto High School Recommendations Map
676
41 MATCH LINE

MATCH LINE

MATCH LINE
Mojave Dr Mojave Dr Aster Rd
Adelanto High School Recommendations
I
13 14
15 Intall ADA curb ramps with detectable warning surface Install bulb outs at Mojave Dr. and Aster Rd.

Install high-visibility crosswalk at Mojave Dr. and Aster Rd. (3 legs) 100 200 Feet
4 nstalar rampas peatonales con superficies podotáctiles de acuerdo con la ADA Instalar extensiones de acera en Mojave Dr. y Aster Rd.

Instalar un paso peatonal de alta visibilidad en Mojave Dr. y Aster Rd. (3 tramos) 4 10 11 12
13 14
12 15 15
15 15
0 13
14 15
50’
12’
5’
10’
52’
12’
5’
10’
Install 12 foot shared-use path along the north side of Mojave Dr from Joshua Rd to Bellflower St Install landscaping along north side of Mojave Dr between shared-use path and road 10 11
12 Install pedestrian scale lighting along Mojave Dr.
4 Install 10 foot sidewalk on south side of Mojave Dr. from Calendula St to Daisy Rd 4 Instalar una banqueta de 10 pies en el lado sur de Mojave Dr de Calendula St to Daisy Rd Instalar un camino de uso compartido de 12 pies a lo largo del lado norte de Mojave Dr de Joshua Rd to Bellflower St Instalar jardines en el lado norte de Mojave Dr. entre el camino de uso compartido y la carretera 10 Instalar alumbrado público peatonal a lo largo de Mojave Dr. 11 12
Recomendaciones para la preparatoria de Adelanto
4 10 11 12
12 677
Adelanto SRTS Plan | Improving Safe Routes to School in Adelanto 42 38’
12’
5’

MATCH LINE
Dawn St
Joshua St
Aster Rd
Hook Blvd

MATCH LINE
Install 12 foot shared-use path on west side of Aster Rd I
16 0 100 200
Feet
Adelanto High School Recommendations/
Recomendaciones para la Escuela Secundaria Adelanto
16 Recomendaciones para la preparatoria de Adelanto
16 Instalar un camino de uso compartido de 12 pies en el lado oeste de Aster Rd. 678
43 38’
12’
5’

MATCH LINE
Arlington St
Thorndale St
Villa St
Aster Rd
16 Install 12 foot shared-use path on west side of Aster Rd I
16 0 100 200
Feet
Adelanto High School Recommendations/
Recomendaciones para la Escuela Secundaria Adelanto
Recomendaciones para la preparatoria de Adelanto
16 Instalar un camino de uso compartido de 12 pies en el lado oeste de Aster Rd. 679
Adelanto SRTS Plan | Improving Safe Routes to School in Adelanto 44 17
18 19
20 53’
12’
5’
12’
12’

MATCH LINE

MATCH LINE
Mojave Dr
Verbena Rd
Daisy Rd
Mojave Dr
Adelanto High School Recommendations
I
17 18
19 20
0 100 200
Feet
17 18
19 20
10 11
12 10 11 12
12 Install 12 foot shared-use path along the north side of Mojave Dr from Joshua Rd to Bellflower St Install landscaping along north side of Mojave Dr between shared-use path and road Install pedestrian scale lighting along Mojave Dr.

Install high-visibility crosswalk at Daisy Rd and Mojave Dr (1 leg) Install high-visibility crosswalk at Verbena Rd and Mojave Dr (3 legs) Install ADA curb ramps with detectable warning surface
Install Assembly A school crossing signage
Instalar un camino de uso compartido de 12 pies a lo largo del lado norte de Mojave Dr de Joshua Rd to Bellflower St Instalar jardines en el lado norte de Mojave Dr. entre el camino de uso compartido y la carretera Instalar alumbrado público peatonal a lo largo de Mojave Dr.

Instalar un paso peatonal de alta visibilidad en Daisy Rd y Mojave Dr (1 tramos) Instalar un paso peatonal de alta visibilidad en Verbano Rd y Mojave Dr (3 tramos) Instalar rampas de bordillo de acuerdo con la ADA con domos truncados podotáctiles Instalar cruce de la escuela de Assembly A
Recomendaciones para la preparatoria de Adelanto
10 11
12 680
45 21
22 23
24 53’
12’
5’
12’
12’
11’

MATCH LINE
Mojave Dr
Alexandria St
Bellower St
Adelanto High School Recommendations
I
21 22
23 24 Intall ADA curb ramps with detectable warning surface at Bellflower St and Mojave Dr (all 4 corners)
Install high-visibility crosswalk at Mojave Dr and Bellflower St (4 legs) Install tra„c signal at Mojave Dr and Bellflower St
Install bulb outs at Mojave Dr and Bellflower St (all 4 corners) 0 100 200
Feet
Instalar rampas peatonales con superficies podotáctiles de acuerdo con la ADA en Bellflower St y Mojave Dr. (en las 4 esquinas)
Instalar un paso peatonal de alta visibilidad en Mojave Dr. y Bellflower St. (4 tramos) Instalar semáforo en Mojave Dr. y Bellflower St.

Instalar extensiones de banqueta en Mojave Dr. y Bellflower St. (las 4 esquinas) 10 11 12
12 Install 12 foot shared-use path along the north side of Mojave Dr from Joshua Rd to Bellflower St Install landscaping along north side of Mojave Dr between shared-use path and road Install pedestrian scale lighting along Mojave Dr.
10 11
12 10
11 12
Instalar un camino de uso compartido de 12 pies a lo largo del lado norte de Mojave Dr de Joshua Rd to Bellflower St Instalar jardines en el lado norte de Mojave Dr. entre el camino de uso compartido y la carretera Instalar alumbrado público peatonal a lo largo de Mojave Dr.

Recomendaciones para la preparatoria de Adelanto
21 22
23 24
681
Adelanto SRTS Plan | Improving Safe Routes to School in Adelanto 46 Aster Rd and Mojave Dr
Looking West
Joshua Rd and Mojave Dr
Looking West
Figure 9 Adelanto High School Street Cross Sections
682
47 DONALD F. BRADACH ELEMENTARY
Recommendations for Donald F. Bradach Elementary School focus on the school, as well as the Bellflower Street corridor, which is the main access road for the school. One of the most important recommendations is a shared use path separated from Bellflower Street, which will help elementary students access the school by active modes more safely and comfortably. This shared use path will be a clear path from the north and south to access the school. The shared use path will help students walk or bike to school without having to contend with the high vehicular speeds on Bellflower Street. Additionally, recommendations focused on providing improved crossing facilities at intersections.

Walk audit participants review the crosswalks near Bradach Elementary School. 683
Adelanto SRTS Plan | Improving Safe Routes to School in Adelanto 48 Bellower St
Mojave Dr
Donald F. Bradach Elementary School Recommendations
I 0 200 400
Feet
1 23

MATCH LINE
Recomendaciones para la Escuela Primaria Donald F. Bradach 19 20
21 22 Intall ADA curb ramps with detectable warning surface at Bellflower St and Mojave Dr (all 4 corners)
23 Install high-visibility crosswalk at Mojave Dr and Bellflower St (4 legs) Install traffic signal at Mojave Dr and Bellflower St
Install bulb outs at Mojave Dr and Bellflower St (all 4 corners) 1 2
3 Instalar rampas de bordillo de acuerdo con la ADA con domos truncados podotáctiles en Bellflower St y Mojave Dr (en las 4 esquinas)
Instalar un paso peatonal de alta visibilidad en Mojave Dr y Bellflower St (4 tramos) Instalar semáforo en Mojave Dr. y Bellflower St
Instalar extensiones de acera en Mojave Dr. y Bellflower St (las 4 esquinas) 19 20 21
22 23
Install 12 foot shared-use path on west side of Bellflower St from Mojave Dr to Donald F. Bradach ES
Instalar un camino de uso compartido de 12 pies en el lado oeste de Bellflower St de Mojave Dr a Donald F. Bradach ES
24 25
27 26
27 29
30 31
21 22
23 24
222725331
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 29
30 31
21 22
23 24
222725331
19 20
21 22
23 24 25
27 26 27
29 30 31
21 22
23 24
222725331
25’
12’
5’
10’
10’
Figure 10 Bradach Recommendations Map
684
49 DONALD F. BRADACH

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Lupin Rd
Bellower St
24 25

MATCH LINE

MATCH LINE
Donald F. Bradach Elementary School Recommendations
I
26 27
Install high-visibility crosswalk at Bellflower St and Lupin Rd (4 legs) Install 12 food shared-use path on north sde of Lupin Rd from Bellflower St to Jonathan St Install bulb-out on southwest corner of Bellflower St and Lupin Rd Install bike parking at school entrance
0 200 400
Feet
Recomendaciones para la Escuela Primaria Donald F. Bradach Instalar un paso peatonal de alta visibilidad en Bellflower St. y Lupin Rd (4 tramos).

Instalar un camino de uso compartido de 12 pies en el lado norte de Lupin Dr de Bellflower St y. Jonathan St
Instalar una extensión de acera en la esquina suroeste de Bellflower St y Lupin Rd Instalar un aparcamiento para bicicletas en la entrada de la escuela 24 25
27 34
26 29
30 31
26 27
28 29
26 27
29 30
31 26
27 28
29 3034
2729731
25 26
29 30
26 27
22925
28 23
23 Install 12 foot shared-use path on west side of Bellflower St from Mojave Dr to Donald F. Bradach ES
Instalar un camino de uso compartido de 12 pies en el lado oeste de Bellflower St de Mojave Dr a Donald F. Bradach ES
222723531
2322272531
52’
12’
5’
10’
10’
12’ 5’ 20’
30 Install 12 foot shared-use path on west side of Bellflower St from Lupin Rd to Holly Rd Instalar un camino de uso compartido de 12 pies en el lado oeste de Bellflower St de Lupin Rd a Holly Rd 30
25’
12’
5’
10’
10’
685
Adelanto SRTS Plan | Improving Safe Routes to School in Adelanto 50 Cactus Rd
Poppy Rd
Bellower St

MATCH LINE

MATCH LINE
Donald F. Bradach Elementary School Recommendations
I
Intall ADA curb ramps with detectable warning surface at Bellflower St and Cactus Rd Intall ADA curb ramps with detectable warning surface at Bellflower St and Poppy Rd Install high-visibility crosswalk at Bellflower St and Poppy Rd (1 leg) 0 200 400
Feet
Recomendaciones para la Escuela Primaria Donald F. Bradach 29 Instalar rampas peatonales con superficies podotáctiles de acuerdo con la ADA de Belflower St y Lupin Rd
28 29
Install high-visibility crosswalk at Bellflower St and Cactus Rd (2 legs) Instalar un paso peatonal de alta visibilidad en Bellflower St. y Cactus Rd. (2 tramos) 30 Instalar un paso peatonal de alta visibilidad en Bellflower St y Poppy Rd (1 tramos) 30 31
3034
33 34
31 32
33 34
31 31
32 29 Instalar rampas peatonales con superficies podotáctiles de acuerdo con la ADA de Bellflower St y Poppy Rd
34 2932
33 30 Install 12 foot shared-use path on west side of Bellflower St from Lupin Rd to Holly Rd Instalar un camino de uso compartido de 12 pies en el lado oeste de Bellflower St de Lupin Rd a Holly Rd 30
25’
12’
5’
10’
10’
686
51 Holly Rd
Bellower St

VICTORIA MAGATHAN

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

MATCH LINE
Donald F. Bradach Elementary School Recommendations
I
30 35
Install ADA curb ramps with detectable warning surface
Install high-visibility crosswalk at south leg of Bellflower St and Holly Rd 36 0 200 400
Feet
Recomendaciones para la Escuela Primaria Donald F. Bradach Instalar rampas peatonales con superficies podotáctiles de acuerdo con la ADA Instalar un paso peatonal de alta visibilidad en el tramo sur de Bellflower St y Holly Rd 34 Install 12 foot shared-use path on west side of Bellflower St from Lupin Rd to Holly Rd 30 Instalar un camino de uso compartido de 12 pies en el lado oeste de Bellflower St. 35 36
35 36
30 25’
12’
5’
10’
10’
687
Adelanto SRTS Plan | Improving Safe Routes to School in Adelanto 52 Bellflower St and Lupin Rd
Looking North
Mojave Dr and Bellflower St
Looking West
Figure 11 Donald F. Bradach Elementary School Street Cross Sections Looking North
Bellflower St and Lupin Rd
Looking North
688
53 VICTORIA MAGATHAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Recommendations for Victoria Magathan Elementary School focus on the school as well as the Bellflower Street corridor, which, similar to Donald F. Bradach Elementary School, is the main access road for the school. The shared use path recommendation along Bellflower Street will also help connections to Victoria Magathan Elementary School.

This improvement, as well as the new sidewalk on Delicious Street, provide connections from both east and west of the campus, allowing more students and their families to safely walk and bike to the school. In addition to the new sidewalks and shared use path, intersection improvements are recommended to help improve crossing conditions.

Walk audit participants review the infrastructure near Magathan Elementary School. 689
Adelanto SRTS Plan | Improving Safe Routes to School in Adelanto 54 Holly Rd
3 MATCH LINE

MATCH LINE
2 Victoria Magathan Elementary School Recommendations
I
1 Bellower St
4 Recomendaciones para la Escuela Primaria Victoria Magathan 4 303422
35 36 Install ADA curb ramps with detectable warning surface Install high-visibility crosswalk at south leg of Bellflower St and Holly Rd 30 Install 12 foot shared-use path on west side of Bellflower St from Mojave Dr to Holly Rd 37 Install sidewalk on south side of Holly Road from Bellflower St to school 35 36
Instalar rampas peatonales con superficies podotáctiles de acuerdo con la ADA Instalar un paso peatonal de alta visibilidad en el tramo sur de Bellflower St. y Holly Rd.

Instalar un camino de uso compartido de 12 pies en el lado oeste de Bellflower St. desde Mojave Dr hasta Holly Rd 35 36
30 Instalar una banqueta en el lado sur de Holly Road desde Bellflower St hasta la escuela 37 371
25’ 12’ 5’ 10’
10’
25’
6’
12’
12’
Figure 12 Magathan Recommendations Map
690
55 VICTORIA MAGATHAN

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Holly Rd
Delicious Rd
Poppy Rd
2 3

MATCH LINE
Victoria Magathan Elementary School Recommendations
I
Install bike parking at school entrance
Install high-visibility crosswalks at Delicious Rd and Holly Rd (W and S legs) Install ADA curb ramps with detectable warning surface at Holly Rd and Delicious Rd Install sidewalk on th west side of Delicious Rd between Holly Rd and Poppy Rd Install high-visibility crosswalks at Delicious Rd and Poppy Rd (all legs) Install ADA curb ramps with detectable warning surface at Delicious Rd and Poppy Rd Recomendaciones para la Escuela Primaria Victoria Magathan Instalar pasos peatonales de alta visibilidad en Delicious Rd y Holly Rd (tramos oeste y sur) 4 Instalar pasos peatonales de alta visibilidad en Delicious Rd y Poppy Rd (todos los tramos) 3 Instalar estacionamiento para bicicletas en la entrada de la escuela 4 Instalar una banqueta en el lado oeste de Delicious Road desde Holly Rd hasta Poppy Rd 381
39 40
41 42431
43 38
39 40
41 42
43 38
39 40
41 42
43 Instalar rampas peatonales con superficies podotáctiles de acuerdo con la ADA en Delicious Rd y Holly Rd Instalar rampas peatonales con superficies podotáctiles de acuerdo con la ADA en Delicious Rd y Poppy Rd 30’ 7’
12’
12’
691
Adelanto SRTS Plan | Improving Safe Routes to School in Adelanto 56 Delicious Rd and Poppy Rd
Looking South
Bellflower St and Holly Rd
Looking North
Figure 13 Victoria Magathan Elementary School Street Cross Sections Delicious Rd and Poppy Rd
Looking South
692
57 Encouraging Safe Routes
to School in Adelanto
5 693
Adelanto SRTS Plan | Encouraging Safe Routes to School in Adelanto 58 Encouraging Safe Routes to School in
Adelanto
Non-infrastructure strategies are an important part of
a comprehensive SRTS program. While infrastructure
improvements provide safer and more comfortable
routes, non-infrastructure SRTS programmatic activities like traffic safety education and walking and biking
celebrations build enthusiasm and encourage families
to choose active modes to get to and from school. In
addition, SRTS policies can provide support for active
transportation and can be an important first step towards implementing more costly infrastructure improvements.

Non-infrastructure strategies can also address immediate concerns like “stranger danger” and “unsafe crossings” by encouraging students and families to commute to school
in groups.

This chapter outlines program and policy
recommendations for Donald F. Bradach Elementary,
Victoria Magathan Elementary, and Adelanto High. While
these recommendations are specific to each school’s
needs and priorities, many of these recommendations
can be implemented in a broader school and
community context in all of Adelanto. Program and policy recommendations for each school are presented in the
tables below.
694
59 PROGRAM

OR POLICY DESCRIPTION RESPONSIBLE PARTY RESOURCES
Encourage
Carpooling
Carpooling gets cars off the street, which can improve traffic congestion around school and improve safety.

Parents/
Caregivers, School
• Marin County Safe Routes to School
SchoolPool Guide
Encourage
Parents and
Students to
Park and Walk
Park and Walk locations within walking distance from the school lessen the congestion around the schools, making it more comfortable and safer for those actively commuting to school.

Parents and caregivers can drop off older students or park and walk with their younger students. Potential Park and Walk locations have been included on the Suggested Route Maps created as a part of this Plan.

Students, Parents/
Caregivers,
Schools
• Suggested Routes Maps (See
Appendix)
• City of Portland, OR’s Park and Walk
information
Hire and
Train Crossing
Guards
Crossing Guards are an important part of the community and serve a vital role in the lives of students who walk or bicycle to school. Crossing Guards help students safely cross the street at key locations and remind drivers of the presence of pedestrians.

Additionally, training is essential to help ensure that anyone who is performing the duties of a Crossing Guard is doing so properly.

School, District
• California Active Transportation
Resource Center, www.
caatpresources.org
Implement
Board Policy
(BP) 5142.2
AESD has adopted BP 5142.2, which states:

The Governing Board recognizes that walking, bicycling, and other forms of active transport to school promote ‘ physical activity and reduce vehicle traffic and air pollution in the vicinity of schools. As part of the district’s coordinated approach to supporting student wellness and safety and
enhancing student learning, the Superintendent or designee shall develop and implement strategies to establish and promote safe routes to school program activities. The
Superintendent or designee may identify a program
coordinator or establish district and/or school site committees to oversee and coordinate related activities. The Superintendent or designee may collaborate with local public works and public safety departments, transportation agencies, other city and county agencies, school staff, parents/guardians and parent organizations, health organizations, community organizations, and/or businesses in the development, implementation, and evaluation of strategies.

District
• Local Control Accountability Plan
(LCAP). The LCAP is a three-year plan
that describes the goals, actions,
services, and expenditures to support
positive student outcomes that
address state and local priorities. The
LCAP provides an opportunity for
schools and school districts to allocate
funds to the programs and services
that meet their local needs, including
Safe Routes to School programs.

Donald F. Bradach Elementary and Victoria Magathan Elementary Schools | SRTS Program and Policy Recommendations 695
Adelanto SRTS Plan | Encouraging Safe Routes to School in Adelanto 60 PROGRAM

OR POLICY DESCRIPTION RESPONSIBLE PARTY RESOURCES
Neighborhood
Safety Signs
Yard signs can be used to remind neighbors, parents/caregivers, and others of relevant laws and safety tips such as no illegal turns, driving slower than the speed limit, and looking out for pedestrians. They can be strategically placed on school grounds (particularly near loading zones) and on adjacent residents' yards.

Students, Teachers,
Parents/Caregivers
• Lawn Sign Safety Campaign, available
from the San Mateo County Office
of Education Safe Routes to School
Program Parent and Community
Empowerment Toolkit
Pedestrian
and Bike
Safety
Education
Pedestrian and bicycle safety skills can be taught in the classroom or during PE using lesson plans that provide
pedestrian and bike education for students, including rules of the road and how to be safe while walking and biking. The curriculum can be structured for appropriate grade and age levels, which can be implemented as part of a school-wide, community wide, or statewide program. Pedestrian safety courses or programs will be most effective with K-3rd grades, and bicycle safety courses or programs will be most effective with 4th-8th grades.

School, District
• National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration’s Child Pedestrian
Safety Education
• Alameda County’s Safe Routes to
School Educator’s Guide
• Minnesota’s Walk! Bike! Fun!
• Orange County Safe Travels Education
Program (STEP) Distance Learning
Videos
Safe Driving
Pledge
Campaign
Parents and caregivers are often offenders when it comes to unsafe driving behaviors in school zones. A Safe Driving Pledge Campaign encourages residents, parents, and caregivers to drive safely near schools.

Parents/
Caregivers,
Schools
• San Bernardino County Safe Routes to
School, www.movetoschool.com
Walk and Bike
to School Days
Walk/Bike to School Days are designed to encourage students and families to choose walking and bicycling to school on specific days. They create an opportunity for schools to highlight the many benefits of walking and biking and promote pedestrian/bike safety for students.

Students, Parents/
Caregivers,
Schools
• Walk and Bike to School Day Resource
Center, www.walkbiketoschool.org
696
61 PROGRAM

OR POLICY DESCRIPTION RESPONSIBLE PARTY RESOURCES
Adopt and
Implement
Board Policy
(BP) 5142.2
VVUHSD has not adopted the California School Board
Association’s sample board and administrative regulations BP/AR 5142.2 – Safe Routes to School Program. Including SRTS language in a school board policy can be an important first step towards supporting SRTS activities in schools throughout the district, including Adelanto High School.

District
• Local Control Accountability Plan
(LCAP). The LCAP is a three-year plan
that describes the goals, actions,
services, and expenditures to support
positive student outcomes that
address state and local priorities. The
LCAP provides an opportunity for
schools and school districts to allocate
funds to the programs and services
that meet their local needs, including
Safe Routes to School programs.

Encourage
Carpooling Carpooling gets cars off the street, which can improve traffic congestion around school and improve safety.

Parents/
Caregivers, School • SchoolPool Guide
Encourage
Parents and
Students to
Park and Walk
Park and Walk locations within walking distance from the school lessen the congestion around the schools, making it more comfortable and safer for those actively commuting to school.

Parents and caregivers can drop off older or park and walk with their younger. Potential Park and Walk locations have been included on the Suggested Route Maps created as a part of this Plan.

Students, Parents/
Caregivers,
Schools
• Suggested Routes Maps (See
Appendix)
Hire and
Train Crossing
Guards
Crossing Guards cannot only help older students safely cross the street and remind drivers of the presence of pedestrians, but they can also serve as deterrents to bullying or other unwanted behaviors. Additionally, training is essential to help ensure that anyone who is performing the duties of a Crossing Guard is doing so properly.

School, District
• California Active Transportation
Resource Center, www.
caatpresources.org
Neighborhood
Safety Signs
Yard signs can be used to remind neighbors, parents/caregivers, and others of relevant laws and safety tips such as no illegal turns, driving slower than the speed limit, and looking out for pedestrians. They can be strategically placed on school grounds (particularly near loading zones) and on adjacent residents’ yards.

Students, Teachers,
Parents/Caregivers
• Lawn Sign Safety Campaign, available
from the San Mateo County Office
of Education Safe Routes to School
Program Parent and Community
Empowerment Toolkit
Adelanto High School | SRTS Program and Policy Recommendations 697
Adelanto SRTS Plan | Encouraging Safe Routes to School in Adelanto 62 PROGRAM

OR POLICY DESCRIPTION RESPONSIBLE PARTY RESOURCES
Facilitate a
Student-Led
Clean-up
Event
Adelanto High School has some of the same safety challenges as many schools, but because of its close proximity to vacant and open space, it faces the additional challenges to students wanting to walk or bike from illegal dumping, people not picking up their pets’ feces, and unlawful dirt bike and car racing. A Student-Led Clean-Up Event, organized by a student club or class, can bring attention to these issues, help students take ownership of their school community, and result in a more comfortable space for walking and biking.

Students, Teachers,
School • TBD
Safe Driving
Pledge
Campaign
Parents, caregivers, and students are often offenders when it comes to unsafe driving behaviors in school zones. A Safe Driving Pledge Campaign encourages residents, parents,
caregivers, and students to drive safely near schools.

Students, Parents/
Caregivers,
Schools
• San Bernardino County Safe Routes to
School, www.movetoschool.com
698
63 Implementing Safe Routes
to School in Adelanto
6 699
Adelanto SRTS Plan | Implementing Safe Routes to School in Adelanto 64 Implementing Safe Routes
to School in Adelanto
Funding for SRTS programs and projects may come from
a variety of sources including matching grants, sales
tax or other taxes, bond measures, or public/private
partnerships. Funding streams are increasingly becoming more competitive, requiring justifications that focus on equity, feasibility, and greenhouse gas emission reduction goals.

In order to help position Adelanto well for future
funding opportunities, the project team packaged all
recommendations into one project. A description of
funding opportunities are summarized in this chapter.
700
65 CALTRANS ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM
With the consolidation of federal funding sources in
MAP-21 and again under the FAST Act, the California
State Legislature has consolidated a number of statefunded programs centered on active transportation into a single program. The resulting Active Transportation
Program (ATP) consolidated the federal programs, Bicycle Transportation Account, the Safe Routes to Schools
Program, and the Recreational Trails Program. The ATP’s authorizing legislation (signed into law by the Governor on September 26, 2013) also includes placeholder language
to allow the ATP to receive funding from the newly
established Cap-and- Trade Program in the future. The
California Transportation Commission writes guidelines
and allocates funds for the ATP, while the ATP will be
administered by the Caltrans Division of Local Assistance.

The next statewide competitive ATP Call for Applications is expected to be released in late Spring 2022.

More information: www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/
atp/index.html

CALTRANS HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT

PROGRAM
The Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is a
data-driven funding program, and eligible projects must be identified through analysis of crash experience, crash potential, crash rate, or other similar metrics. Infrastructure and non-infrastructure projects are eligible for HSIP
funds. Bicycle and pedestrian safety improvements,
enforcement activities, traffic calming projects, and
crossing treatments for active transportation users in
school zones are examples of eligible projects. All HSIP projects must be consistent with the state’s Strategic
Highway Safety Plan. In California, HSIP is administered by Caltrans.

More information: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/
LocalPrograms/hsip.html
701
Adelanto SRTS Plan | Implementing Safe Routes to School in Adelanto 66 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF

GOVERNMENTS SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES

PROGRAM (SCP)
Created in 2005, the Southern California Association of Government (SCAG) Sustainable Communities Program
(SCP) can provide resources and assistance to Adelanto
to complete local planning efforts. The SCP provides
resources to support active transportation and multimodal efforts and sustainability, equity in transportation
planning, reductions in motorized vehicle miles traveled and reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. The SCP can fund quick build projects, SRTS Plans, active transportation infrastructure, and pedestrian plazas, and can assist
in evaluating the success of new infrastructure and
programming.

More information: https://scag.ca.gov/sustainablecommunities-program

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

AUTHORITY MEASURE I
Measure I is a half-cent sales tax in San Bernardino
County which can fund projects until 2040. Adelanto can apply for this grant to fund road maintenance, sidewalk installations, ADA upgrades and other transportation
improvements. Funding is distributed based on the
Measure I 2010-2040 Ordinance and Expenditure Plan
and the Strategic Plan. The San Bernardino County
Transportation Authority administers the revenue and is responsible for ensuring funds are used properly.

More information: https://www.gosbcta.com/funding/
measure-i

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

AUTHORITY TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT
The Transportation Development Act (TDA) provides
funding for building and maintaining bicycle and
pedestrian facilities. Funds can also be distributed to improve public transit stops, including construction of new sidewalks near a bus stop. San Bernardino County
Transportation Authority oversees the distribution of these funds. Bicycle projects must be included in San Bernardino County Transportation Authority Non-Motorized
Transportation Plan. Funding is available to cover up to 90% of total project costs, and 50% of the total funding available is reserved for smaller projects under $250,000.

More information: https://www.gosbcta.com/plan/
transportation-development-act-tda
702
67 Cost Estimates
Appendix A
703
Detailed Engineer's Estimate and Total Project Costs- Cycle 5 Important: Read the Instructions in the first sheet (tab) before entering data. Do not enter data in shaded fields (with formulas).

Project Information:

Agency: City of Adelanto Date: 7/27/2021
Project Description: Adelanto Safe Routes to School Improvements Project Location: Donald F. Bradach Elementary School
Licensed Engineer in responsible charge of preparing or reviewing this PSR-Equivalent Cost Estimate: License #:

Engineer's Estimate and Cost Breakdown:

Cost Breakdown
Engineer's Estimate (for Construction Items Only) ATP Eligible ATP Ineligible Corps/CCC Costs/Items Costs/Items to construct
Item
No. Item Quantity Units Unit Cost TotalItem Cost %$ %$ % $ General Overhead-Related Construction Items
1 Mobilization/ Demobilization 1 LS $100,000.00 $100,000 100% $100,000 2 Traffic Control and Construction Signing 1 LS $150,000.00 $150,000 100% $150,000 3 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan and BMP Implementation 1 LS $75,000.00 $75,000 100% $75,000 4 Clearing and Grubbing 1 LS $25,000.00 $25,000 100% $25,000 5 Unclassified Excavation (Including removals of AC, Base, PCC, C&G, etc) 1 LS $185,000.00 $185,000 100% $185,000 6 LS 100%
7 LS 100%
8 LS 100%
9 LS 100%
10 LS 100%
General Construction Items
11 Construct ADA Concrete Curb Ramp (Includes 2-ft AC Slot Trench) 14 EA $5,000.00 $70,000 100% $70,000 12 Construct PCC Sidewalk 84710 SF $12.00 $1,016,520 100% $1,016,520 13 Construct 6" Curb and Gutter 7060 LF $10.00 $70,600 100% $70,600 14 Thermoplastic High Visibility Crosswalk 1725 SF $25.00 $43,125 100% $43,125 15 Install Sign and Post 5 EA $375.00 $1,875 100% $1,875 16 Construct Curb Extension 5 EA $40,000.00 $200,000 100% $200,000 17 6" Asphalt Concrete (AC) Pavement 550 TON $140.00 $77,000 100% $77,000 18 8" Crushed Miscellaneous Base 185 CY $85.00 $15,725 100% $15,725 19 Install Traffic Signal at Mojave Dr and Bellflower St 1 EA $300,000.00 $300,000 100% $300,000 20 Install Bicycle Parking 10 EA $300.00 $3,000 100% $3,000 21 100%
22 100%
23 100%
24 100%
25 100%
26 100%
27 100%
28 100%
29 100%
30 100%
31 100%
32 100%
33 100%
34 100%
35 100%
36 100%
37 100%
38 100%
39 100%
40 100%
41 100%
42 100%
43 100%
44 100%
45 100%
46 100%
47 100%
48 100%
49 100%
50 100%
51 100%
52 100%
Subtotal of Construction Items: $2,332,845 $2,332,845
Construction Item Contingencies (% of Construction Items): 15.00% $349,927 $349,927 Total (Construction Items & Contingencies) cost: $2,682,772 $2,682,772 Project Delivery Costs:

Type of Project Cost Cost $
Preliminary Engineering (PE) ATP Eligible Costs Non-participating Costs Environmental Studies and Permits(PA&ED): $100,000
Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E): $325,000 "PE" costs / "CON" costs Total PE: $ $425,000 425,000 16% 25% Max
Right of Way (RW)
Right of Way Engineering:

Acquisitions and Utilities:

Total RW: $ -
Construction Engineering (CE) "CE" costs / "CON" costs
Construction Engineering (CE): 15% Max
Total Project Delivery: $425,000 $425,000
Total Construction Costs: $3,107,772 $2,682,772
ATP Eligible Costs Non-participating Costs
Total Project Cost: $2,682,772
Documentation of Ineligible (Non-Participating) Costs:

The Engineer's logic and/or calculations for splitting costs between ATP-Eligible and Non-participating costs must be documented in this section of the Estimate form.

Separate logic is required for each item which is partly ineligible for ATP funding or is required for the construction of an ineligible item/element of the project.

Item #: Description of Engineer's Logic: (See examples shown in the Instructions) $ 325,000
$ 100,000
$2,682,772
10/19/2021 1 of 1
704
Detailed Engineer's Estimate and Total Project Costs- Cycle 5 Important: Read the Instructions in the first sheet (tab) before entering data. Do not enter data in shaded fields (with formulas).

Project Information:

Agency: City of Adelanto Date: 7/27/2021
Project Description: Adelanto Safe Routes to School Improvements Project Location: Victoria Magatham Elementary School
Licensed Engineer in responsible charge of preparing or reviewing this PSR-Equivalent Cost Estimate: License #:

Engineer's Estimate and Cost Breakdown:

Cost Breakdown
Engineer's Estimate (for Construction Items Only) ATP Eligible ATP Ineligible Corps/CCC Costs/Items Costs/Items to construct
Item No. Item Quantity Units Unit Cost Total
Item Cost %$ %$ % $
General Overhead-Related Construction Items
1 Mobilization/ Demobilization 1 LS $50,000.00 $50,000 100% $50,000 2 Traffic Control and Construction Signing 1 LS $50,000.00 $50,000 100% $50,000 3 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan and BMP Implementation 1 LS $25,000.00 $25,000 100% $25,000 4 Clearing and Grubbing 1 LS $15,000.00 $15,000 100% $15,000 5 Unclassified Excavation (Including removals of AC, Base, PCC, C&G, etc) 1 LS $100,000.00 $100,000 100% $100,000 6 LS 100%
7 LS 100%
8 LS 100%
9 LS 100%
10 LS 100%
General Construction Items
11 Construct ADA Concrete Curb Ramp (Includes 2-ft AC Slot Trench) 4 EA $5,000.00 $20,000 100% $20,000 12 Construct PCC Sidewalk 47,496 SF $12.00 $569,952 100% $569,952 13 Construct 6" Curb and Gutter 4,589 LF $42.00 $192,717 100% $192,717 14 Thermoplastic High Visibility Crosswalk 1,416 SF $25.00 $35,400 100% $35,400 15 6" Asphalt Concrete (AC) Pavement 345 TON $140.00 $48,300 100% $48,300 16 8" Crushed Miscellaneous Base 115 CY $85.00 $9,775 100% $9,775 17 Install Bicycle Parking 10 EA $300.00 $3,000 100% $3,000 18 Install Sign and Post 5 EA $375.00 $1,875 100% $1,875 19 100%
20 100%
21 100%
22 100%
23 100%
24 100%
25 100%
26 100%
27 100%
28 100%
29 100%
30 100%
31 100%
32 100%
33 100%
34 100%
35 100%
36 100%
37 100%
38 100%
39 100%
40 100%
41 100%
42 100%
43 100%
44 100%
45 100%
46 100%
47 100%
48 100%
49 100%
50 100%
51 100%
52 100%
Subtotal of Construction Items: $1,121,019 $1,121,019
Construction Item Contingencies (% of Construction Items): 15.00% $168,153 $168,153 Total (Construction Items & Contingencies) cost: $1,289,172 $1,289,172 Project Delivery Costs:

Type of Project Cost Cost $
Preliminary Engineering (PE) ATP Eligible Costs Non-participating Costs Environmental Studies and Permits(PA&ED): $50,000
Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E): $150,000 "PE" costs / "CON" costs Total PE: $ $200,000 200,000 16% 25% Max
Right of Way (RW)
Right of Way Engineering:

Acquisitions and Utilities:

Total RW: $ -
Construction Engineering (CE) "CE" costs / "CON" costs
Construction Engineering (CE): $150,000 12% 15% Max
Total Project Delivery: $350,000 $350,000
Total Construction Costs: $1,639,172 $1,439,172
ATP Eligible Costs Non-participating Costs
Total Project Cost: $1,289,172
Documentation of Ineligible (Non-Participating) Costs:

The Engineer's logic and/or calculations for splitting costs between ATP-Eligible and Non-participating costs must be documented in this section of the Estimate form.

Separate logic is required for each item which is partly ineligible for ATP funding or is required for the construction of an ineligible item/element of the project.

Item #: Description of Engineer's Logic: (See examples shown in the Instructions) $ 150,000
$ 50,000
$1,289,172
$ 150,000
10/19/2021 1 of 1
705
Detailed Engineer's Estimate and Total Project Costs- Cycle 5 Important: Read the Instructions in the first sheet (tab) before entering data. Do not enter data in shaded fields (with formulas).

Project Information:

Agency: City of Adelanto Date: 7/27/2021
Project Description: Adelanto Safe Routes to School Improvements Project Location: Adelanto High School
Licensed Engineer in responsible charge of preparing or reviewing this PSR-Equivalent Cost Estimate: License #:

Engineer's Estimate and Cost Breakdown:

Cost Breakdown
Engineer's Estimate (for Construction Items Only) ATP Eligible ATP Ineligible Corps/CCC Costs/Items Costs/Items to construct
Item
No. Item Quantity Units Unit Cost TotalItem Cost %$ %$ % $ General Overhead-Related Construction Items
1 Mobilization/ Demobilization 1 LS $150,000.00 $150,000 100% $150,000 2 Traffic Control and Construction Signing 1 LS $100,000.00 $100,000 100% $100,000 3 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan and BMP Implementation 1 LS $45,000.00 $45,000 100% $45,000 4 Clearing and Grubbing 1 LS $25,000.00 $25,000 100% $25,000 5 Unclassified Excavation (Including removals of AC, Base, PCC, C&G, etc) 1 LS $225,000.00 $225,000 100% $225,000 6 LS 100%
7 LS 100%
8 LS 100%
9 LS 100%
10 LS 100%
General Construction Items
11 Construct ADA Concrete Curb Ramp (Includes 2-ft AC Slot Trench) 16 EA $5,000.00 $80,000 100% $80,000 12 Construct PCC Sidewalk 130,630 SF $12.00 $1,567,555 100% $1,567,555 13 Construct 6" Curb and Gutter 11293.3 LF $10.00 $112,933 100% $112,933 14 Thermoplastic High Visibility Crosswalk 2784 SF $25.00 $69,600 100% $69,600 15 Construct Traffic Circle with Pavement Markings 1 EA $100,000.00 $100,000 100% $100,000 16 Pedestrian Scale Lighting 1 LS $750,000.00 $750,000 100% $750,000 17 Install Bicycle Parking 10 EA $300.00 $3,000 100% $3,000 18 Install Landscaping 1 LS $150,000.00 $150,000 100% $150,000 19 6" Asphalt Concrete (AC) Pavement 850 TON $140.00 $119,000 100% $119,000 20 8" Crushed Miscellaneous Base 290 CY $85.00 $24,650 100% $24,650 21 100%
22 100%
23 100%
24 100%
25 100%
26 100%
27 100%
28 100%
29 100%
30 100%
31 100%
32 100%
33 100%
34 100%
35 100%
36 100%
37 100%
38 100%
39 100%
40 100%
41 100%
42 100%
43 100%
44 100%
45 100%
46 100%
47 100%
48 100%
49 100%
50 100%
51 100%
52 100%
Subtotal of Construction Items: $3,521,738 $3,521,738
Construction Item Contingencies (% of Construction Items): 15.00% $528,261 $528,261 Total (Construction Items & Contingencies) cost: $4,049,999 $4,049,999 Project Delivery Costs:

Type of Project Cost Cost $
Preliminary Engineering (PE) ATP Eligible Costs Non-participating Costs Environmental Studies and Permits(PA&ED): $125,000
Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E): $500,000 "PE" costs / "CON" costs Total PE: 625,000 $ $625,000 15% 25% Max
Right of Way (RW)
Right of Way Engineering:

Acquisitions and Utilities:

Total RW: - $
Construction Engineering (CE) "CE" costs / "CON" costs
Construction Engineering (CE): $385,000 10% 15% Max
Total Project Delivery: $1,010,000 $1,010,000
Total Construction Costs: $5,059,999 $4,434,999
ATP Eligible Costs Non-participating Costs
Total Project Cost: $4,049,999
Documentation of Ineligible (Non-Participating) Costs:

The Engineer's logic and/or calculations for splitting costs between ATP-Eligible and Non-participating costs must be documented in this section of the Estimate form.

Separate logic is required for each item which is partly ineligible for ATP funding or is required for the construction of an ineligible item/element of the project.

Item #: Description of Engineer's Logic: (See examples shown in the Instructions) $ 500,000
$ 125,000
$4,049,999
$ 385,000
10/19/2021 1 of 1
706
Adelanto SRTS Plan | Recommendations Maps
68 Recommendations Maps
Appendix B
707
Feet
0 100 200

MATCH LINE

MATCH LINE

MATCH LINE

MATCH LINE

ADELANTO HIGH SCHOOL
Joshua Rd
Calendula St
Mojave Dr
Mojave Dr Mojave Dr Aster Rd
1 2
3 3
4 5
Adelanto High School Recommendations
Formalize pick-up and drop-o with signage and curb markings Install 10 foot sidewalk on south side of Mojave Dr. from Calendula St to Daisy Rd Install high-visibility crosswalk with ADA curb ramps with detectable warning surface Install bicycle parking on campus
Install pedestrian scale lighting along Joshua Rd
I
1 2
4 Install tra
c circle at Mojave Dr. and Calendula St.
3 5
6 Intall ADA curb ramps with detectable warning surface 7 Install 12 foot shared-use path along the north side of Mojave Dr from Joshua Rd to Bellflower St Install high-visibility crosswalk at Mojave Dr. and Joshua Rd. (3 legs) Install bulb-out at Mojave Dr and Josua Rd.

Install landscaping along north side of Mojave Dr between shared-use path and road 0 100 200 Feet
7 8
8 9
10 11
12 6
Recomendaciones para la preparatoria de Adelanto
Formalizar las áreas para dejar y recoger estudiantes con señalizacion y marcas en la banqueta IInstalar un paso peatonal de alta visibilidad con rampas peatonales con superficies podotáctiles de acuerdo con la ADA Instalar una banqueta de 10 pies en el lado sur de Mojave Dr de Calendula St to Daisy Rd Instalar estacionamiento para bicicletas en la entrada de la escuela Instalar un alumbrado público peatonal a lo largo de Joshua Rd. 1 2
4 Instalar una glorieta en Mojave Dr. y Calendula St.
3 5
6 Instalar rampas peatonales con superficies podotáctiles de acuerdo con la ADA 7 Instalar un camino de uso compartido de 12 pies a lo largo del lado norte de Mojave Dr de Joshua Rd to Bellflower St Instalar un paso peatonal de alta visibilidad en Mojave Dr. y Joshua Rd. (3 tramos) Instalar extensiones de acera en Mojave Dr. y Joshua Rd.

Instalar jardines en el lado norte de Mojave Dr. entre el camino de uso compartido y la carretera 8 9
10 Adelanto High School Recommendations
I
13 14
15 Intall ADA curb ramps with detectable warning surface Install bulb outs at Mojave Dr. and Aster Rd.

Install high-visibility crosswalk at Mojave Dr. and Aster Rd. (3 legs) 100 200 Feet
4 nstalar rampas peatonales con superficies podotáctiles de acuerdo con la ADA Instalar extensiones de acera en Mojave Dr. y Aster Rd.

Instalar un paso peatonal de alta visibilidad en Mojave Dr. y Aster Rd. (3 tramos) 9 10
11 12
12 4
10 11 12
13 14
12 15 15
15 15
Install pedestrian scale lighting along Mojave Dr.

Instalar alumbrado público peatonal a lo largo de Mojave Dr. 0 13
14 15
65’
10’
65’
50’
12’
5’
10’
50’
12’
5’
10’
52’
12’
5’
10’
11 12
Install 12 foot shared-use path along the north side of Mojave Dr from Joshua Rd to Bellflower St Install landscaping along north side of Mojave Dr between shared-use path and road 10 11
12 Install pedestrian scale lighting along Mojave Dr.
4 Install 10 foot sidewalk on south side of Mojave Dr. from Calendula St to Daisy Rd 4 Instalar una banqueta de 10 pies en el lado sur de Mojave Dr de Calendula St to Daisy Rd Instalar un camino de uso compartido de 12 pies a lo largo del lado norte de Mojave Dr de Joshua Rd to Bellflower St Instalar jardines en el lado norte de Mojave Dr. entre el camino de uso compartido y la carretera 10 Instalar alumbrado público peatonal a lo largo de Mojave Dr. 11 12
Recomendaciones para la preparatoria de Adelanto
4 10 11 12
12 5
38’
12’
5’

MATCH LINE
Dawn St
Joshua St
Aster Rd
Hook Blvd

MATCH LINE
Install 12 foot shared-use path on west side of Aster Rd I
16 0 100 200
Feet
Adelanto High School Recommendations/
Recomendaciones para la Escuela Secundaria Adelanto
16 Recomendaciones para la preparatoria de Adelanto
16 Instalar un camino de uso compartido de 12 pies en el lado oeste de Aster Rd. 38’
12’
5’

MATCH LINE
Arlington St
Thorndale St
Villa St
Aster Rd
16 Install 12 foot shared-use path on west side of Aster Rd I
16 0 100 200
Feet
Adelanto High School Recommendations/
Recomendaciones para la Escuela Secundaria Adelanto
Recomendaciones para la preparatoria de Adelanto
16 Instalar un camino de uso compartido de 12 pies en el lado oeste de Aster Rd. 708
Bellower St
Mojave Dr
Donald F. Bradach Elementary School Recommendations
I 0 200 400
Feet
1 23

MATCH LINE
Recomendaciones para la Escuela Primaria Donald F. Bradach 19 20
21 22 Intall ADA curb ramps with detectable warning surface at Bellflower St and Mojave Dr (all 4 corners)
23 Install high-visibility crosswalk at Mojave Dr and Bellflower St (4 legs) Install traffic signal at Mojave Dr and Bellflower St
Install bulb outs at Mojave Dr and Bellflower St (all 4 corners) 1 2
3 Instalar rampas de bordillo de acuerdo con la ADA con domos truncados podotáctiles HQ%HOO³RZHU6W\0RMDYH'U
HQODVHVTXLQDV

,QVWDODUXQSDVRSHDWRQDOGHDOWDYLVLELOLGDGHQ0RMDYH'U\%HOO³RZHU6W WUDPRV

,QVWDODUVHPiIRURHQ0RMDYH'U\%HOO³RZHU6W
,QVWDODUH[WHQVLRQHVGHDFHUDHQ0RMDYH'U\%HOO³RZHU6W ODVHVTXLQDV
19 20
21 22
23 Install 12 foot shared-use path on west side of Bellflower St from Mojave Dr to Donald F. Bradach ES
,QVWDODUXQFDPLQRGHXVRFRPSDUWLGRGHSLHVHQHOODGRRHVWHGH%HOO³RZHU6WGH Mojave Dr a Donald F. Bradach ES
24 25
27 26
27 29
30 31
21 22
23 24
222725331
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 29
30 31
21 22
23 24
222725331
19 20
21 22
23 24 25
27 26 27
29 30 31
21 22
23 24
222725331
25’
12’
5’
10’
10’
DONALD F. BRADACH

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Lupin Rd
Bellower St
24 25

MATCH LINE

MATCH LINE
Donald F. Bradach Elementary School Recommendations
I
26 27
Install high-visibility crosswalk at Bellflower St and Lupin Rd (4 legs) Install 12 food shared-use path on north sde of Lupin Rd from Bellflower St to Jonathan St Install bulb-out on southwest corner of Bellflower St and Lupin Rd Install bike parking at school entrance
0 200 400
Feet
Recomendaciones para la Escuela Primaria Donald F. Bradach ,QVWDODUXQSDVRSHDWRQDOGHDOWDYLVLELOLGDGHQ%HOO³RZHU6W\/XSLQ5G WUDPRV

Instalar un camino de uso compartido de 12 pies en el lado norte de Lupin Dr de Bellflower St y. Jonathan St
,QVWDODUXQDH[WHQVLyQGHDFHUDHQODHVTXLQDVXURHVWHGH%HOO³RZHU6W\/XSLQ5G Instalar un aparcamiento para bicicletas en la entrada de la escuela 24 25
27 34
26 29
30 31
26 27
28 29
26 27
29 30
31 26
27 28
29 3034
2729731
25 26
29 30
26 27
22925
28 23
23 Install 12 foot shared-use path on west side of Bellflower St from Mojave Dr to Donald F. Bradach ES
,QVWDODUXQFDPLQRGHXVRFRPSDUWLGRGHSLHVHQHOODGRRHVWHGH%HOO³RZHU6WGH Mojave Dr a Donald F. Bradach ES
222723531
2322272531
52’
12’
5’
10’
10’
12’ 5’ 20’
30 Install 12 foot shared-use path on west side of Bellflower St from Lupin Rd to Holly Rd ,QVWDODUXQFDPLQRGHXVRFRPSDUWLGRGHSLHVHQHOODGRRHVWHGH%HOO³RZHU6WGH Lupin Rd a Holly Rd 30
25’
12’
5’
10’
10’
Cactus Rd
Poppy Rd
Bellower St

MATCH LINE

MATCH LINE
Donald F. Bradach Elementary School Recommendations
I
Intall ADA curb ramps with detectable warning surface at Bellflower St and Cactus Rd Intall ADA curb ramps with detectable warning surface at Bellflower St and Poppy Rd Install high-visibility crosswalk at Bellflower St and Poppy Rd (1 leg) 0 200 400
Feet
Recomendaciones para la Escuela Primaria Donald F. Bradach 29 Instalar rampas peatonales con superficies podotáctiles de acuerdo con la ADA de Belflower St y Lupin Rd
28 29
Install high-visibility crosswalk at Bellflower St and Cactus Rd (2 legs) ,QVWDODUXQSDVRSHDWRQDOGHDOWDYLVLELOLGDGHQ%HOO³RZHU6W\&DFWXV5G WUDPRV

30 ,QVWDODUXQSDVRSHDWRQDOGHDOWDYLVLELOLGDGHQ%HOO³RZHU6W\3RSS\5G WUDPRV

30 31
3034
33 34
31 32
33 34
31 31
32 29 Instalar rampas peatonales con superficies podotáctiles de acuerdo con la ADA de %HOO³RZHU6W\3RSS\5G
34 2932
33 30 Install 12 foot shared-use path on west side of Bellflower St from Lupin Rd to Holly Rd ,QVWDODUXQFDPLQRGHXVRFRPSDUWLGRGHSLHVHQHOODGRRHVWHGH%HOO³RZHU6WGH Lupin Rd a Holly Rd 30
25’
12’
5’
10’
10’
709
Holly Rd
3 MATCH LINE MATCH LINE
2 Victoria Magathan Elementary School Recommendations
I
1 Bellower St
4 Recomendaciones para la Escuela Primaria Victoria Magathan 4 303422
35 36 Install ADA curb ramps with detectable warning surface Install high-visibility crosswalk at south leg of Bellflower St and Holly Rd 30 Install 12 foot shared-use path on west side of Bellflower St from Mojave Dr to Holly Rd 37 Install sidewalk on south side of Holly Road from Bellflower St to school 35 36
Instalar rampas peatonales con superficies podotáctiles de acuerdo con la ADA,QVWDODUXQSDVRSHDWRQDOGHDOWDYLVLELOLGDGHQHOWUDPRVXUGH%HOO³RZHU6W\+ROO\5G,QVWDODUXQFDPLQRGHXVRFRPSDUWLGRGHSLHVHQHOODGRRHVWHGH%HOO³RZHU6WGHVGH0RMDYH'UKDVWD+ROO\5G 35 36
30 Instalar una banqueta en el lado sur de Holly Road desde Bellflower St hasta la escuela 37 371
25’ 12’ 5’ 10’
10’
25’
6’
12’
12’

VICTORIA MAGATHANELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Holly Rd
Delicious Rd
Poppy Rd
2 3

MATCH LINE
Victoria Magathan Elementary School Recommendations
I
Install bike parking at school entranceInstall high-visibility crosswalks at Delicious Rd and Holly Rd (W and S legs)Install ADA curb ramps with detectable warning surface at Holly Rd and Delicious RdInstall sidewalk on th west side of Delicious Rd between Holly Rd and Poppy RdInstall high-visibility crosswalks at Delicious Rd and Poppy Rd (all legs)Install ADA curb ramps with detectable warning surface at Delicious Rd and Poppy Rd Recomendaciones para la Escuela Primaria Victoria Magathan Instalar pasos peatonales de alta visibilidad en Delicious Rd y Holly Rd (tramos oeste y sur) 4 Instalar pasos peatonales de alta visibilidad en Delicious Rd y Poppy Rd (todos los tramos) 3Instalar estacionamiento para bicicletas en la entrada de la escuela 4 Instalar una banqueta en el lado oeste de Delicious Road desde Holly Rd hasta Poppy Rd 381
3940
41 42431
43 38
3940
414243
38 3940414243
Instalar rampas peatonales con superficies podotáctiles de acuerdo con la ADA en Delicious Rd y Holly RdInstalar rampas peatonales con superficies podotáctiles de acuerdo con la ADA en Delicious Rd y Poppy Rd 30’ 7’
12’
12’
710
711

← All documents from this meeting