Cities Index.
Exhibit 2 - Jurisdictional CIP Policy Chart

Alameda City Council
December 5, 2023

Document
Exhibit 2 - Jurisdictional CIP Policy Chart
Meeting
December 5, 2023
Body
Alameda City Council
Original file
204 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on legistar1.granicus.com. That file is the official record.

Rent Control Jurisdic�ons with CIP Applica�ons Separate from Fair Return Processes Renter Popula�on per 2017 American Community Survey census data Page 1 of 2 Jurisdic�on Renter Popula�on Cost Threshold
Staff
Determina�on/
Hearing Officer
Tenant
Hardship
Op�on
Project Cost
Recovery
Pass Through Increase
Cap
Los Angeles 2,321,544 N/A Staff No 50% $55/month
San Francisco 477,798 N/A Hearing Officer Yes
1-5 Units = 100%
6+ Units = 50%
Seismic – 100%
$30/month or no more
than 5% of current rent
San Jose 418,053 N/A Hearing Officer No 100% 3% of current rent Oakland 238,645 N/A Hearing Officer No 70%
10% including
AGA + Banking, no more
than 30% increase in
5-year period
Santa Ana 180,991 N/A Hearing Officer No 100% 10% of current rent Hayward 73,110 N/A Hearing Officer No 50% 10% including
AGA + Banking
Mountain View 44,744 N/A Hearing Officer Yes
1-5 Units = 90%
6-20 Units = 75%
21+ Units = 50%
5% of current rent
Alameda
(currently) 38,581 8* the monthly
rent on all units Staff No 100% No Cap
Culver City 17,270 N/A Staff Yes 50% 3% of current rent
Rent Control Jurisdic�ons that Address Capital improvements Only via Fair Return Processes Renter Popula�on per 2017 American Community Survey census data Page 2 of 2 Jurisdic�on Renter Popula�on
Sacramento 245,752
Santa Ana 180,991
Santa Monica 60,544
Berkeley 57,909
Richmond 54,524
An�och 44,096
Gardena 38,581
West Hollywood 28,673
Palm Springs 28,062
East Palo Alto 20,811
Beverly Hills 18,803
Los Gatos 17,862

← All documents from this meeting