AMENDED EXHIBIT 3 – DECISION MAKING TABLE
EXISTING REVIEW PROCESS
Application Type
Role of Review Authority(1)
Planning
Director City Engineer Planning Board City Council
Parcel Map Recommendation Recommendation Recommendation Decision Tentative Tract Map Recommendation Recommendation Recommendation Decision Final Map/Improvements - Recommendation - Decision
Certificate of Compliance Recommendation Decision (1) - - Lot Line Adjustment Recommendation Decision (1) - -
Parcel Map Waiver Recommendation Recommendation - Decision Reversion to Acreage - Recommendation - Decision
Time Extension Decision - - -
(1) Note: At its sole discretion, the review authority may transfer original hearing jurisdiction to a higher body.
PROPOSED REVIEW PROCESS (1)
Application Type
Role of Review Authority
Basis for
Change Planning
Director City Engineer Planning
Board City Council
Tentative Parcel Map Decision Recommendation Appeal/Call Appeal/Call Streamlining Parcel Map Decision Recommendation Appeal/Call Appeal/Call Streamlining Tentative Tract Map Recommendation Recommendation Decision Appeal/Call Streamlining Final Map /
Improvements
- Recommendation - Decision No Change
Certificate of
Compliance
Recommendation Decision - - No Change
Lot Line Adjustment Recommendation Decision - - No Change Parcel Map Waiver Decision Recommendation Appeal/Call Appeal/Call Streamlining Technical Corrections Recommendation Decision - - State Law Technical
Amendments
Decision Recommendation Appeal/Call Appeal/Call State Law Urban Lot Split Decision Recommendation - - State Law
Reversion to Acreage - Recommendation - Decision No Change Time Extension Decision - - - No Change
(1) Note: Recommended additions and changes to the current process are shown in italics NOTE: Decisions of the Planning Director, City Engineer and Planning Board would remain subject to appeal and call for review as provided in AMC section 30-25.