Cities Index.
Exhibit 1: Bridge Waterway Study Schedule and Cost

Alameda City Council
September 17, 2024

Document
Exhibit 1: Bridge Waterway Study Schedule and Cost
Meeting
September 17, 2024
Body
Alameda City Council
Original file
70 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on legistar1.granicus.com. That file is the official record.

If yes, what is the estimated indirect cost rate? ______

JASO NDJFM A MJJASO NDJFM A MJJASO NDJFM A MJ
01 $0 $1,530 $0 $1,530
02 $0 $2,943 $0 $2,943
1 $113,120 $15,000 $0 $128,120
2 $245,443 $28,500 $0 $273,943
3 $35,266 $3,500 $0 $38,766
4 $28,122 $3,644 $0 $31,766
5 $48,641 $6,301 $0 $54,942
6 $9,478 $1,228 $0 $10,706
$480,070 $62,646 $0 $542,716
Draft and Final Reports
City Commission/Council Presentations
Totals
FY 2025/26 FY 2026/27
Task
#
Estimated
Local
In-Kind Match*
Estimated Total
Project Cost*
FY 2024/25
Grant Amount*
Estimated
Local Cash
Match*
Task Title
Advisory Committee Meetings
Project Administration
(no more than 5% of total grant funds)
Consultant Procurement
Data Collection and Simulation Model Development
Data Analysis and Simulation Runs
Key Stakeholder Outreach
Local Match Calculator (posted on-line)Use the Local Match Calculator to ensure that grant and local match amounts are correct:

Reimbursements/
Invoicing
Disclaimers
Agency commits to the Cost and Schedule below.  Any changes will need to be approved by Caltrans prior to initiating any Cost and Schedule change or amendment.

Use only whole dollars in the financial information fields. No roundin g up or down and no cents.

Does your agency plan to request reimburesement for indirect costs? Does your agency plan to use the Tapered Match approach for invoicing purposes? California Department of Transportation
Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant Program

COST AND SCHEDULE
Grant Category Sustainable Communities Competitive Technical Oakland-Alameda Estuary Waterway Study
FY 2024-25Grant Fiscal Year
City of Alameda
Project Title
Organization
(Legal name)
Yes
No
Yes
No

← All documents from this meeting