City of Alameda
City Council Handbook & Code of Conduct
Mayor Marilyn Ezzy Ashcraft
Vice Mayor John Knox White
Council Member Jim Oddie
Council Member Tony Daysog
Council Member Malia Vella
Table of Contents
Title Page No.
A. Ethics 3
B. Conduct 5
1. Elected and Appointed Officials’ Conduct with One Another 5
2. Elected and Appointed Officials’ Conduct with City Staff 7
3. Elected and Appointed Officials’ Conduct with the Public 10
4. Council Conduct with Other Public Agencies 12
5. Council Conduct with Boards and Commissions 12
6. Agenda Setting 12
7. Conduct with the Media 12
C. Sanctions 13
D. Principles of Proper Conduct 14
E. Checklist for Monitoring Conduct 15
F. Glossary of Terms 15
G. Implementation 16
APPENDIX A - Model of Excellence Member Statement 17
Policy Purpose
The City Council has adopted a Code of Ethics and Conduct for its members, as well as the City’s boards and commissions , to ensure the integrity of local government and its effected, and fair operation.
A. ETHICS
The residents and businesses of Alameda are entitled to have fair, ethical , and accountable local government which has earned the public’s full confidence for integrity. In keeping with the City of Alameda Commitment to Excellence (see Appendix A) , the effective function of democratic government therefore requires:
public officials, both elected and appointed, comply with both the letter and spirit of the laws and policies affecting the operations of government;
public officials be independent, impartial and fair in their judgment and actions; public office be used for the public good, not for personal gain; and public deliberations a nd processes be conducted openly, unless legally confidential, in an atmosphere of respect and civility.
The Ethics section of the City’s Code of Ethics and Conduct provides guidance on questions of right and wrong.
1. Act in the Public Interest . Recogni zing that stewardship of the public interest must be their primary concern, members will work for the common good of the people of Alameda and not for any private or personal interest, and they will assure fair and equal treatment of all persons, claims and transactions coming before the City Council, boards and/or commissions.
2. Comply with both the spirit and the letter of the Law and City Policy . Members shall comply with the laws of the nation, the State of California and the City of Alameda in the performance of their public duties. These laws include, but are not limited to: the United States and California constitutions; the Alameda City Charter; laws pertaining to conflicts of interest, election campaigns, financial disclosures, employer responsibilities, and open processes of government; and City ordinances and policies.
3. Conduct of Members . The professional and personal conduct of members must be above reproach and avoid even the appearance of impropriety. Members shall refrain from abusive conduct, personal charges or verbal attacks upon the character or motives of other members of Council, boards and commissions, the staff, and/or public.
4. Respect for Process. Members shall perform their duties in accordance with the processes and rules of order established by the City Council and board and commissions governing the deliberation of public policy issues, meaningful involvement of the public, and implementation of policy decisions of the City Council by City staff.
5. Conduct of Public M eetings. Members shall prepare themselves for public issues; listen courteously and attentively to all public discussions before the body; and focus on the business at hand. They shall refrain from interrupting other speakers; making personal comments not germane to the business of the body; or otherwise interfering with the orderly conduct of meetings.
6. Decisions Based on Merit. Members shall base their decisions on the merits and substance of the matter at hand, rather than on unrelated considerations.
7. Communication. Members shall publicly disclose substantive information that is relevant to a matter under consideration by the Council or boards and commissions, which they may have received from sources outside of the public decision-making process.
8. Conflict of Interest . In order to assure their independence and impartiality on behalf of the common good, members shall not use their official positions to influence government decisions in which they have a material financial interest, or where they have an o rganizational responsibility or personal relationship which may give the appearance of a conflict of interest.
In accordance with the law, members shall disclose investments, interests in real property, sources of income, and gifts; and they shall abstain from participating in deliberations and decision-making where conflicts may exist.
9. Gifts and Favors. Members shall not take any special advantage of services or opportunities for personal gain, by virtue of their public office that are not available to the public in general. They shall refrain from accepting any gifts, favors or promises of future benefits which might compromise their independence of judgment or action or give the appearance of being compromised.
10. Confidential Information. Members shall respect the confidentiality of information concerning the property, personnel , and/ or affairs of the City. They shall neither disclose confidential information without proper legal authorization, nor use such information to advance their personal, financial, and/or other private interests.
11. Use of Public Resources. Members shall not use public resources not available to the public in general, such as City staff time, equipment, supplies or facilities, for private gain or personal purposes.
12. Representation of Private Interests. Members of Council shall not appear on behalf of the private interests of third parties before the Council or any board, commission, or proceeding of the City, nor shall members of boards and commissions appear before their own bodies or before the Council on behalf of the private interests of third parties on matters related to the areas of service of their bodies.
13. Advocacy. Members shall represent the official policies or positions of the City Council, board or commission to the best of their ability when designated as delegates for this purpose. When presenting their individual opinions and positions, members shall explici tly state they do not represent their body or the City of Alameda, nor will they allow the inference that they do.
Councilmembers and board and commission members have the right to endorse candidates for all Council seats or other elected offices. It is inappropriate to mention or display endorsements during Council meetings, board/commission meetings, or other official City meetings.
14. Policy Role of Members. Members shall respect and adhere to the council-manager structure of City’s government as outlined by the Alameda City Charter. In this structure, the City Council determines the policies of the City with the advice, information , and analysis provided by the public, boards and commissions, and City staff. Except as provided by the City Charter, members therefore shall not interfere with the administrative functions of the City or the professional duties of City staff; nor shall they impair the ability of staff to implement Council policy decisions.
15. Independence of boards and comm issions. Because of the value of the independent advice of boards and commissions to the public decision- making process, members of Council shall refrain from using their position to influence the deliberations or outcomes of board and commission proceedings.
16. Positive Work Place Environment . Members shall support the maintenance of a positive and constructive work place environment for City employees and for residents and businesses dealing with the City. Members shall recognize their special role in dealings with City employees to in no way create the perception of inappropriate direction to staff.
B. CONDUCT
The Conduct section of the City’s Code of Ethics and Conduct is designed to describe the manner in which Councilmembers and board and commission me mbers should treat one another, City staff, constituents, and others they come into contact with in representing the City of Alameda.
The constant and consistent theme through all of the conduct guidelines is "respect." Councilmembers experience huge workloads and tremendous stress in making decisions that could impact thousands of lives. Despite these pressures, elected and appointed officials are called upon to exhibit appropriate behavior at all times. Demonstrating respect for each individual through w ords and actions is the touchstone that can help guide Councilmembers and board and commission members to do the right thing in even the most difficult situations.
1. Elected and Appointed Officials’ Conduct with One Another
Elected and appointed bodies are composed of individuals with a wide variety of backgrounds, personalities, values, opinions, and goals. Despite this diversity, all have chosen public service as a way to enhance the community. In all cases, this common goal should be acknowledged even though individuals may "agree to disagree" on contentious issues.
1(a). In Public Meetings
Use formal titles
Elected and appointed officials should refer to one another formally during public meetings, such as Mayor, Vice Mayor, Chair, Commissioner or Councilmember followed by the individual’s last name.
Practice civility and decorum in discussions and debate Difficult questions, tough challenges to a particular point of view, and criticism of ideas and information are legitimate elements of a free de mocracy in action. This does not allow, however, public officials to make belligerent, personal, impertinent, slanderous, threatening, abusive, or disparaging comments. No shouting or physical actions that could be construed as threatening will be tolerated.
Honor the role of the chair in maintaining order
It is the responsibility of the chair to keep the comments of members on track during public meetings.
Members should honor efforts by the chair to focus discussion on current agenda items. If there is disagreement about the agenda or the chair’s actions, those objections should be voiced politely and with reason.
Avoid personal comments that could offend other members If a member is personally offended by the remarks of another member, the offended memb er should make notes of the actual words used and call for a "point of personal privilege" that challenges the other member to justify or apologize for the language used. The chair will maintain control of this discussion.
Demonstrate effective problem-solving approaches
Members have a public stage to show how individuals with disparate points of view can find common ground and seek a compromise that benefits the community as a whole.
Outside of official board or commission meetings, individual board and commission members are not authorized to represent the City or their board or commission unless specifically designated by the Council or the board or commission to do so for a particular purpose. In private settings, board and commission members may communicate at any time and on any subject with individual members of the City Council, and may express to them individual viewpoints and opinions. In public, however, all members shall represent the official policies or positions of their board or commission, with the following exception. During a Council public hearing on any item addressed by the board or commission, any member may speak under standard time limits, but shall indicate whether their testimony represents an official position (majority opinion) or a minority opinion of the board/commission to which they belong. The chair shall represent the majority view of the board or commission, but may report on any minority views as well, including his or her own. When an official board or commission position differs from staff’s recommendation on a particular policy issue, then at the Council’s discretion additional time may be provided to the chair of the board or commission (or his/her designee) to explain the position of the board/commission or to rebut statements made by staff or the public. If new information is brought to light during a public hearing which was not shared previously with the board or commission, the Council may allow the board or commission chair to respond. If the Council deems the new information sufficient to warrant additional study, then by majority vote Council may remand the issue back to the board or commission for further study prior to taking other action itself.
Individual opinions and positions may be expressed by board and commission members regarding items that have not come before the particular board/commission to which they belong. When presenting their individual opinions and positions, members shall explicitly state they do not represent their body or the City of Alameda, nor will they allow the inference that they do.
Although a board or commission may disagree with the final decision the Council makes, the board or commission shall not act in any manner contrary to the established policy adopted by the Council.
1(b). In Private Encounters
Continue respectful behavior in private
The same level of respect and consideration of differing points of view that is deemed appropriate for public discussions should be maintained in private conversations.
Be aware of the insecurity of written notes, voicemail messages, and email Technology allows words written or said without much forethought to be distributed wide and far.
Would you feel comfortable to have this note shared with others ? How would you feel if this voicemail message were played on a speaker phone in a full office? What would happen if this email message were forwarded to others? Written notes, voicemail messages and email should be treated as potentially "public" communication.
Even private conversations can have a public presence
Elected and appointed officials are always on display – their actions, mannerisms, and language are monitored by people around them that they may not know. Lunch table conversations will be eavesdropped upon, parking lot debates will be watched, and casual comments between individuals before and after public meetings noted.
In private, board and commission members may communicate at any time and on any subject with the City Council, and may express to Council individual viewpoints and opinions.
2. Elected and Appointed Officials’ Conduct with City Staff
Governance of a City relies on the cooperative efforts of elected officials, who set policy, appointed officials who advise the elected, and City staff who implements and administers the Council’s policies. Therefore, every effort should be made to be cooperative and show mutual respect for the contributions made by each individual for the good of the community.
Treat all staff as professionals
Clear, honest communication that respects the abilities, experience, and dignity of each individual is expected. Poor behavior towards staff is not acceptable.
Member questions/inquiries to City staff
1. General. Council and board/commission communications with City staff should be limited to normal City business hours unless the circumstances warrant otherwise.
2. Routine Requests for Information and Inquiries . Members may contact staff directly for information made readily available to the gen eral public on a regular basis (e.g., “What are the library’s hours of operation?” or “How does one reserve a tee time at the golf course?”). Under these circumstances staff shall treat the member no differently than they would the general public, and the member shall not use their elected status to secure preferential treatment. The C ity Manager does not need to be advised of such contacts.
3. Non-Routine Requests for Readily Available Information. Members may also contact staff directly for easily retrievable information not routinely requested by the general public so long as it does not require staff to discuss the issue or express an opinion (e.g., “How many traffic lights are there in the City?” or “Under what circumstances does the City lower its flags to half-mast?”).
4. Non-Routine Requests Requiring Special Effort . Any member request or inquiry that requires staff to compile information that is not readily available or easily retrievable and/or that requests staff to express an opinion (legal or otherw ise) must be directed to the City Manager, or to the City Attorney, as appropriate (e.g., “How many Study Issues completed over the past five years have required 500 or more hours of staff time?”, or “What is the logic behind the City’s sign ordinances affecting businesses?”). The City Manager (or City Attorney as appropriate) shall be responsible for distributing such requests to his/her staff for follow-up. Responses to such requests shall be copied to all Councilmembers (if originating from a Councilmemb er), relevant board or commission members (if originating from a board or commission member), the City Manager , the City Attorney as appropriate and affected department directors.
5. Meeting Requests. Any member request for a meeting with staff must be directed to the City Manager or City Attorney, as appropriate.
Do not disrupt City staff from their jobs
Elected and appointed officials should not disrupt City staff while they are in meetings, on the phone, or engrossed in performing their job functions in order to have their individual needs met. Do not attend City staff meetings unless requested by staff – even if the elected or appointed official does not say anything, his or her presence implies support, shows partiality, may intimidate staff, and hampers staff’s ability to do their job objectively.
Never publicly criticize an individual employee
Elected and appointed officials should never express concerns about the performance of a City employee in public, to the employee directly, or to the employee’s manager. Comments about staff performance should only be made to the City Manager , or City Attorney as appropriate, through private correspondence or conversation.
Do not get involved in administrative functions
Elected and appointed officials must not attempt to influence City staff on the making of appointments, awarding of contracts, selecting of consultants, processing of development applications, or granting of City licenses and permits.
Check with City staff on correspondence before taking action
Before sending correspondence, Councilmembers should check with City staff to see if an official City response has already been sent or is in progress.
Limit requests for staff support
Routine secretarial support will be provided to all Councilmembers. The Council Executive Assistant opens all mail for Councilmembers, unless a Councilmem ber requests other arrangements. Mail addressed to the Mayor is reviewed first by the City Manager who notes suggested action and/or follow-up items.
Requests for additional staff support – even in high priority or emergency situations – should be made to the City Manager, and/or City Attorney as appropriate, who are responsible for allocating City resources in order to maintain a professional, well-run City government.
Do not solicit political support from staff
Elected and appointed officials should not solicit any type of political support (financial contributions, display of posters or lawn signs, name on support list, etc.) from City staff. City staff may, as private residents with constitutional rights, support political candidates but all such activities must be done away from the workplace.
3. Elected and Appointed Officials’ Conduct with the Public
3(a). In Public Meetings
Making the public feel welcome is an important part of the democratic process. No signs of partiality, prejudice or disrespect should be evident on the part of individual members toward an individual participating in a public forum. Every effort should be made to be fair and impartial in listening to public testimony.
Be welcoming to speakers and treat them with care and gentleness . While questions of clarification may be asked, the official’s primary role during public testimony is to listen. "I give many public presentations so standing up in front of a group and using a microphone is not new to me. But I found that s peaking in front of Council was an entirely different experience. I was incredibly nervous and my voice was shaking. I think the reason was because the issue was so personal to me. The Council was going to take a vote that would affect my family’s daily life and my home. I was feeling a lot of emotion. The way that Council treats people during public hearings can do a lot to make them relax or to push their emotions to a higher level of intensity."
Be fair and equitable in allocating public hearing time to individual speakers.
The chair will determine and announce limits on speakers at the start of the public hearing process.
Questions should not be asked for the express purpose of allowing one speaker to evade the time limit imposed on all others (e.g., “Was there something else you wanted to say?”).
No speaker will be turned away unless he or she exhibits inappropriate behavior. Each speaker may only speak once during any particular agenda item unless the chair requests additional clarification later in the process. After the close of the public hearing, no more public testimony will be accepted unless the chair reopens the public hearing for a limited and specific purpose.
Give the appearance of active listening
It is disconcerting to speakers to have members not look at them when they are speaking. It is fine to look down at documents or to make notes, but reading for a long period of time or gazing around the room gives the appearance of disinterest. Be aware of facial expressions, especially those that could be interpreted as "smirking," disbelief, anger, or boredom.
Maintain an open mind
Members of the public deserve an opportunity to influence the thinking of elected and appointed officials. To express an opinion or pass judgment prior to the close of a public hearing casts doubt on a member’s ability to conduct a fair review of the issue. This is particularly important when officials are serving in a quasi-judicial capacity.
Ask for clarification, but avoid debate and argument with the public If speakers become flustered or defensive by questions, it is the responsibility of the chair to attempt to calm and focus the speaker and to maintain the order and decorum of the meeting. Questions by members to the public testifying should seek to clarify or expand information. It is never appropriate to belligerently challenge or belittle the speaker. Members’ personal opinions or inclinations about upcoming votes should not be revealed until after the public hearing is closed.
No personal attacks of any kind, under any circumstance Members should be aware that their body language and tone of voice, as well as the words they use, can appear to be intimidating or aggressive.
Follow parliamentary procedure in conducting public meetings The City Clerk serves as advisory parliamentarian for the City and is available to answer questions or interpret situations according to parliamentary procedures. The chair, subject to the appeal of the full Council or board/commission makes final rulings on parliamentary procedure.
3(b). In Unofficial Settings
Make no promises on behalf of the Council, board/commission or City Members will frequently be asked to explain a Council or board/commission action or to g ive their opinion about an issue as they meet and talk with constituents in the community. It is appropriate to give a brief overview of City policy and to refer to City staff for further information. It is inappropriate to overtly or implicitly promise Council or board/commission action, or to promise City staff will do something specific (fix a pothole, remove a library book, plant new flowers in the median, etc.).
Make no personal comments about other members
It is acceptable to publicly disagree about an issue, but it is unacceptable to make derogatory comments about other members, their opinions, and actions.
Remember that despite its operational capacity , Alameda is a small town at heart Members are constantly being observed by the community every da y that they serve in office. Their behaviors and comments serve as models for proper deportment in the City of Alameda. Honesty and
respect for the dignity of each individual should be reflected in every word and action taken by members, 24 hours a day, seven days a week. It is a serious and continuous responsibility.
4. Council Conduct with Other Public Agencies
Be clear about representing the City or personal interests When representing the City, the Councilmember must support and advocate the official City position on an issue, not a personal viewpoint. Outside of official board or commission meetings, board and commission members are not authorized to represent the Cit y or their board or commission unless specifically designated by the Council or the board or commission to do so for a particular purpose.
When representing another organization whose position is different from the City, the Councilmember should withdraw from voting on the issue if it significantly impacts or is detrimental to the City’s interest. Councilmembers should be clear about which organizations they represent and inform the Mayor and Council of their involvement.
Correspondence also should be equally clear about representation City letterhead may be used when the Councilmember is representing the City and the City’s official position. A copy of official correspondence should be given to the Council Executive Assistant to be filed in the Council Office as part of the permanent public record.
City letterhead should not be used for non- City business nor for correspondence representing a dissenting point of view from an official Council position.
5. Council Conduct with Boards and Commissions
The City has established several boards and commissions as a means of gathering more community input. Residents who serve on boards and commissions are likely to become more involved in government and serve as advisors to the City Council. They are a valua ble resource to the City’s leadership and should be treated with appreciation and respect.
If attending a board or commission meeting, be careful to only express personal opinions Councilmembers may attend any board or commission meeting, which are always open to any member of the public. However, they should be sensitive to the way their participation - especially if it is on behalf of an individual, business , or developer - could be viewed as unfairly affecting the process. Any public comments by a Counc ilmember at a board or commission meeting should be clearly made as individual opinion and not a representation of the feelings of the entire City Council.
Limit contact with board and commission members to questions of clarification It is inappropriate for a Councilmember to contact a board or commission member to lobby on behalf of an individual, business, or developer, and vice versa. It is acceptable for Councilmembers to contact board or commission members in order to clarify a position taken by the board or commission.
Remember that boards and commissions serve the community, not individual Councilmembers The City Council appoints individuals to serve on boards and commissions, and it is the responsibility of boards and commissions to follow policy established by the Council. But board and commission
members do not report to individual Councilmembers, nor should Councilmembers feel they have the power or right to threaten board and commission members with removal if they disagree about an issue. Appointment and re-appointment to a board or commission should be based on such criteria as expertise, ability to work with staff and the public, and commitment to fulfilling official duties. A board or commission appointment should not be used as a political "reward."
Be respectful of diverse opinions
A primary role of boards and commissions is to represent many points of view in the community and to provide the Council with advice based on a full spectrum of concerns and perspectives.
Councilmembers may ha ve a closer working relationship with some individuals serving on boards and commissions, but must be fair and respectful of all residents serving on boards and commissions.
Keep political support away from public forums
Board and commission members may offer political support to a Councilmember, but not in a public forum while conducting official duties. Conversely, Councilmembers may support board and commission members who are running for office, but not in an official forum in their capacity as a Councilmember.
6. Agenda Setting
The agenda is the official guide for Council meetings. Prepared by staff, the agenda includes current legislative and policy issues that Council reviews and, on which the Council may take action. By law and subject to ver y limited exceptions, the Council cannot take action on items or issues which are not listed on the agenda.
The City Manager, City Clerk, and City Attorney may meet with the Mayor, and other members of the Council as necessary, to collaborate on the set ting of the agenda. Unless otherwise specifically directed by the Council, the City Manager, City Clerk, and City Attorney shall have final authority to set the agenda for their respective area of administrative responsibility.
7. Conduct with the Media
Board and commission members are not authorized to represent the City outside of official board/commission meetings unless specifically authorized to do so.
Councilmembers are frequently contacted by the media for background and quotes.
The best advice for dealing with the media is to never go "off the record" Most members of the media represent the highest levels of journalistic integrity and ethics, and can be trusted to keep their word. But one bad experience can be catastrophic. Words that are not said cannot be quoted.
The Mayor is the official spokesperson for the City on City positions.
The Mayor is the designated representative of the Council to present and speak on an official City position. If an individual Councilmember is contacted by the media, the Councilmember should be clear about whether their comments represent the official City position or a personal viewpoint.
Choose words carefully and cautiously
Comments taken out of context can cause problems. Be especially cautious about humor, sardonic asides, sarcasm, or word play. It is never appropriate to use personal slurs or swear words when talking with the media.
C. SANCTIONS
Model of Excellence
City Councilmembers, board and commission members, and Council appointees who do not sign the Model of Excellence (see Appendix A) shall be ineligible for intergovernmental assignments or Council subcommittees.
Ethics Training for Local Officials
City Councilmembers, board and commission members, and Council appointees who are out of compliance with State- or City-mandated requirements for ethics training shall not represent the City on intergovernmental assignments or Council sub-committees, and may be subject to sanctions.
Public Disruption
Members of the public who do not follow proper conduct after a warning in a public hearing may be barred from further testimony at that meeting and/or removed from the Council Chambers.
Inappropriate Staff Behavior
Councilmembers should refer to the City Manager , or City Attorney as appropriate, any City staff who do not follow proper conduct in their dealings with Councilmembers, other City staff, or the public. These employees may be disciplined in accordance with standard City procedures for su ch actions. (Please refer to the section on Council Conduct with City Staff for more details on interaction with Staff.)
Councilmembers Behavior and Conduct – Compliance and Enforcement The Code of Ethics and Conduct expresses standards of ethical conduct expected for members of the City Council, boards and commissions. Members themselves have the primary responsibility to assure that ethical standards are understood and met, and that the public can continue to have full confidence in the integrity of gove rnment. The chairs of boards and commissions and the Mayor and Councilmembers have the additional responsibility to intervene when actions of members that appear to be in violation of the Code of Ethics and Conduct are brought to their attention.
Councilmembers should point out to the offending Councilmember infractions of the Code of Ethics and Conduct. If the offenses continue, then the matter should be referred to the Mayor in private. If the Mayor is the individual whose actions are being challenged, then the matter should be referred to the Vice Mayor.
It is the responsibility of the Mayor to initiate action if a Councilmember’s behavior may warrant sanction. If no action is taken by the Mayor, the alleged violation(s) can be brought up with the ful l Council in a public meeting.
Board and Commission Members Behavior and Conduct
Counseling, verbal reprimands, and written warnings may be administered by the Mayor to board and commission members failing to comply with City policy. These lower levels o f sanctions shall be kept private to the degree allowed by law. Copies of all written reprimands administered by the Mayor shall be distributed in memo format to the chair of the respective board or commission, the city clerk, the city attorney, the city manager, and the City Council. Written reprimands administered by the Mayor shall not be included in packets for public meetings and shall not be publicized except as required under the Public Records Act.
The City Council may impose sanctions on board and commission members whose conduct does not comply with the City’s policies, up to and including removal from office. Any form of discipline imposed by Council shall be determined by a majority vote of at least a quorum of the Council at a noticed public meeting and such action shall be preceded by a Report to Council with supporting documentation. The Report to Council shall be distributed in accordance with normal procedures, including hard copies to numerous public facilities and posting online. Any Report to Council addressing alleged misconduct by a board or commission member shall be routed through the Office of the City Attorney for review of whether any information is exempt from disclosure (subject to redaction) based on privacy interests authorized under the Public Records Act.
When deemed warranted, the Mayor or majority of Council may call for an investigation of board or commission member conduct. Should the City Manager or City Attorney believe an investigation is warranted, they shall confer with the Council. The Council may ask the City Manager and/or the City Attorney to investigate the allegation and report the findings.
The results of any such investigation shall be provided to the full Council in the form of a Report to Council, and shall be placed on the agenda of a noticed public meeting as “Information Only”. Any such report shall be made public and distributed in accordance with normal procedures (i.e., hard copies to numerous public locations and posted online). Any report to Council addressing the investigation of board and commission members shall be routed through the Office of the City Attorney for review of whether any information is exempt from disclosure (subject to redaction) based on privacy interests authorized under the Public Records Act.
It shall be the Council’s responsibility to determine the next appropriate action. Any such action taken by Council (with the exception of “take no further action”) shall be conducted at a noticed public hearing. These actions include, but are not limited to: discussing and counseling the individual on the violations; placing the matter on a future public hearing agenda to consider sanctions; forming a Council ad hoc subcommittee to review the allegation, the investigation, and its findings, as well as to recommend sanction options for Council consideration.
D. PRINCIPLES OF PROPER CONDUCT
Proper conduct IS …
Keeping promises
Being dependable
Building a solid reputation
Participating and being available
Demonstrating patience
Showing empathy
Holding onto ethical principles under stress
Listening attentively
Studying thoroughly
Keeping integrity intact
Overcoming discouragement
Going above and beyond, time and time again
Modeling a professional manner
Proper conduct IS NOT …
Showing antagonism or hostility
Deliberately lying or misleading
Speaking recklessly
Spreading rumors
Stirring up bad feelings, divisiveness
Acting in a self-righteous manner
It all comes down to respect
Respect for one another as individuals … respect for the validity of different opinions … respect for the democratic process … respect for the community that we serve.
E. CHECKLIST FOR MONITORING CONDUCT
o Will my decision/statement/action violate the trust, rights or good will of others? o What are my interior motives and the spirit behind my actions? o If I have to justify my conduct in public tomorrow, will I do so with pride or shame? o How would my conduct be evaluated by people whose integrity and character I respect? o Even if my conduct is not illegal or unethical, is it done at someone else’s painful expense? Will it destroy their trust in me? Will it harm their reputation? o Is my conduct fair? Just? Morally right?
o If I were on the receiving end of my conduct, would I approve and agree, or would I take offense? o Does my conduct give others reason to trust or distrust me? o Am I willing to take an ethical stand when it is called for? Am I willing to make my ethical beliefs public in a way that makes it clear what I stand for?
o Do I exhibit the same conduct in my private life as I do in my public life? o Can I take legitimate pride in the way I conduct myself and the example I set? o Do I listen and understand the views of others?
o Do I question and confront different points of view in a constructive manner? o Do I work to resolve differences and come to mutual agreement? o Do I support others and show respect for their ideas? o Will my conduct cause public embarrassment to someone else?
F. GLOSSARY OF TERMS
attitude The manner in which one shows one’s dispositions, opinions, and feelings
behavior External appearance or action; manner of behaving; carriage of oneself civility Politeness, consideration, courtesy
conduct The way one acts; personal behavior
courtesy Politeness connected with kindness
decorum Suitable; proper; good taste in behavior
manners A way of acting; a style, method, or form; the way in which thing are done point of order An interruption of a meeting to question whether rules or bylaws are being broken, such as the speaker has strayed from the motion currently under consideration
point of personal
privilege
A challenge to a speaker to defend or apologize for comments that a fellow member considers offensive
propriety Conforming to acceptable standards of behavior protocol The courtesies that are established as proper and correct respect The act of noticing with attention; holding in esteem; courteous regard
G. IMPLEMENTATION
As an expression of the standards of conduct for members expected by the City, the Ala meda Code of Ethics and Conduct is intended to be self -enforcing. It therefore becomes most effective when members are thoroughly familiar with it and embrace its provisions. For this reason, this document shall be included in the regular orientations for candidates for City Council, applicants to board and commissions, and newly elected and appointed officials. Members entering office shall sign a statement affirming they read and understood the City of Alameda Code of Ethics and Conduct.
APPENDIX A - Model of Excellence Member Statement
MODEL OF EXCELLENCE
Alameda City Council, Boards and Commissions
MEMBER STATEMENT
As a member of the Alameda City Council or of an Alameda board or commission, I agree to uphold the Code of Ethics and Conduct for Elected and Appointed Officials and conduct myself by the following model of excellence. I will:
• Recognize the worth of individual members and appreciate their individual talents, perspectives and contributions;
• Help create an atmosphere of respect and civility where individual members, City staff and the public are free to express their ideas and work to their full potential;
• Conduct my personal and public affairs with honesty, integrity, fairness and respect for others;
• Respect the dignity and privacy of individuals and organizations;
• Keep the common good as my highest purpose and focus on achieving constructive solutions for the public benefit;
• Avoid and discourage conduct which is divisive or harmful to the best interests of Alameda; and
• Treat all people with whom I come in contact in the way I wish to be treated.
I affirm that I have read and understood the City of Alameda Code of Ethics and Conduct for Elected and Appointed Officials.
Signature Date