Settlement Agreement
This Settlement Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into this __ day of March 2025 ("Effective Date"), by and between the City of Oakland, a municipal corporation, acting by and through its Board of Port Commissioners ("Port" or "Port of Oakland"), the City of Alameda, a municipal corporation ("City'' or "City of Alameda") and Citizens League for Airport Safety and Serenity, a nonprofit corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of California ("CLASS") (each individually a "Party" or collectively, "Parties") in reference to the following facts and circumstances.
RECITALS
A. This Agreement is entered into in good faith for the purpose of settling the disputes between the Parties relating to the Final Environmental Impact Report certified on November 21, 2024, State Clearinghouse Number 2021050164 ("EIR"), for the Oakland Airport Terminal Modernization and Development Project ("Project").
B. This Agreement does not constitute an admission by any of the Parties of the strength or weakness of the other side's claims or defenses.
C. The Parties acknowledge that the City and CLASS each have an interest in (a) ensuring that Port considers and discloses how future expansion of Oakland Airport ("Airport" or "OAK") facilities under the Project fits into long-term plans for the Airport, (b} ensuring that Port considers and discloses the short-and long-term environmental impacts of any future expansion of Airport facilities under the Project, and (c) avoiding _or minimizing environmental impacts (and, in particular, nighttime noise impacts) from Airport operations on those who reside, work, or recreate in the City. The City and CLASS each submitted multiple comment letters to the Port regarding these interests and concerns in connection with the Port's publication of both the draft and final EIR.
D. The Parties also acknowledge Port's interest in (a) the safe and efficient operation of the Airport; (b) responding to and seeking to accommodate the demand for air transportation at the Airport; (c) responding to and balancing the concerns of all of its neighboring communities, affected communities, Airport users, and tenants; (d) providing sufficient facilities for existing and future air carriers operating at the Airport; (e) complying with all federal and state laws, orders, and requirements; and (f) moving swiftly to address all safety, security, or emergency related matters at ttie Airport.
E. The Parties have previously entered into several other settlement agreements regarding the Port's operation of the Airport, including: (1) the July 1976 Settlement Agreement; (2) the November 14, 2001 Phase 1 Agreement; and (3) the October 8, 2002 Phase 2 Agreement, (collectively, the "Earlier Settlement Agreements").
Some signatories to the Earlier Settlement Agreements are not signatories to the instant Agreement. The Parties and certain other entities jointly produced a March 8, 2013, Written Compliance Plan, with the stated purpose of meeting certain requirements set forth in the Earlier Settlement Agreements. That Written Compliance Plan, which was not formally adopted by the Port, served as the basis for the OAK Noise Plan that is attached hereto as Exhibit A adopted as part of this Agreement.
1 AGREEMENT
Based on the recitals set forth above, and in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants, and obligations herein, the sufficiency of which consideration is hereby expressly acknowledged by all Parties, the Parties agree as follows:
1. Restatement of and Recommitment to Earlier Settlement Agreements, Including Measures to Address Noise Abatement Procedures Relating to Departures
A. Project Construction Noise Plan: The Port shall develop or require all prime construction contractors to develop a construction noise plan limiting construction-related noise increases to no more than 5 dBA above baseline exterior noise levels from the Project ("Construction Noise Plan"). The Construction Noise Plan shall include monitoring prior to the start of Project construction to establish baseline exterior noise levels to compare against for the 5 dBA inc[ease threshold ("Baseline").
The Construction· Noise Plan shall include a section describing noise monitoring equipment, locations, and methods for establishing a representative Baseline. The Construction Noise Plan shall include a provision that states that, if noise levels exceed 5 dBA above the Baseline at any monitored location, the Port shall require . the contractor to implement additional noise measures to reduce noise increase to below 5 dBA above Baseline. Noise attenuation measures to reduce the threshold exceedance could include, but are not limited to, noise curtains, noise blankets, or temporary sound walls during construction.
The Construction Noise Plan shall include an outreach program to inform the public of upcoming construction activities and Project status. Outreach may include but is not limited to OAK bulletins, community advisories, website updates, stakeholder meetings, and City of Alameda council meetings. Stakeholder outreach shall also include public and private schools, as mutually determined by the Port and the City of Alameda. '
The Port shall comply with City of Oakland's noise and construction ordinances in effect at the time of construction. The noisiest on~site construction activities shall avoid noise-sensitive times of the day, as feasible, including between the hours of 7:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. Monday through Friday and 8:00 p.m. to 9:00 a.m. Saturday, Sunday, and Federal holidays. Stationary source equipment that can be used flexibly with regard to relocation (such as generators and compressors) shall be located at the greatest distance practical from noise-sensitive iand uses. "Quiet design" air compressors and other quieter construction equipment shall be used when feasible and when such technology and equipment is commercially available.
2 B. OAK Noise Plan: Attached hereto, as Exhibit A, and incorporated as part of this Agreement by this reference is the OAK Noise Plan. The OAK Noise Plan reflects the steps the Port will implement to encourage and maximize aircraft compliance, and to discourage and minimize any diminution in compliance, with the noise abatemept procedures ("NAP") specified therein and other existing and ongoing OAK procedures. The Port shall prominently post the OAK Noise Plan on the Port's website and shall distribute relevant provisions of it to all Port staff and contractors involved in noise abatement efforts and implementation of other terms of this Agreement.
C. Staffing: The Port shall provide the level of staff that it reasonably determines is necessary to implement the OAK Noise Plan.
D. Compliance with Other Earlier Settlement Obligations: The Parties shall continue to comply with the Earlier Settlement Agreements. Nothing in this Settlement Agreement shall be construed to diminish or waive any Party's obligations under the Earlier Settlement Agreements:
E. Quieter Aircraft: The Port shall continue to encourage airlJne and cargo carriers to use Stage 4 or quieter aircraft and technologies at OAK, as feasible.
F. Coordination with Aircraft Operators: The Port shall use good faith best efforts to encourage aircraft operators, including FedEx, to reengage in discussions regarding testing and timely implementation of flight departure changes to further reduce cargo jet noise.
2. . The Project's Inclusion of Dual Taxiways/Taxiway B A. Taxiway Bravo: The Parties acknowledge that maintaining access between OAK's North_ and South Fields via TaxiwayBravo is of critical importance to airport operations and the community's noise concerns. The Parties further acknowledge that to help maintain such access as aircraft activity increases at OAK, if a new terminal is constructed parallel to Taxiway Bravo, then the Project must include a new taxiway parallel to Taxiway Bravo to enable uninterrupted flow between the North and South Fields and, among other things, facilitate use of Runway 12/30 by North Field aircraft whenever feasible. The Port shall plan, design, and undertake project construction activities to facilitate aircraft movements between North and South Field and minimize operational impacts, to the-extent possible, on existing Taxiway Bravo.
Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a depiction of the possible alignment of a new secondary, parallel taxiway. This exhibit is provided for illustrative purposes only to demonstrate how - aircraft push backs and maneuvering could possibly be accommodated with full buildout of the Project without impacting flows on Taxiway Bravo.if the new terminal were constructed parallel to Taxiway Bravo. Based on the final proposed terminal concourse and gate configuration and alignment, the 3 Port shall plan, design, and construct the proposed apron and airfield configuration (e.g., taxiway and taxilane) to safely and efficiently accommodate aircraft pushbacks, and both passenger and cargo aircraft maneuvers to and from the South Field runway, to the extent possible and, to the maximum extent possible minimize impacts to Taxiway Bravo and facilitate the use of Runway 12/30 by North Field aircraft. The new parallel taxiway shall be constructed and operational prior to OAK beginning use of any gate at the new terminal if the new terminal is constructed parallel to Taxiway Bravo.
3. Port-City Collaboration; FAA Coordination to Improve Departure Procedures
A. Board of Port Commissioners and Alameda City Council Collaboration: The Port and the City agree to establish annual meetings between I
a committee of the Board of Port Commissioners and the Alameda City Council ("Joint Meetings"). No more than three members of the Board of Port Commissioners and no more than two members of the Alameda City Council shall be named to this Joint Committee at any given time. The Joint Meetings shall be advisory and informational only and shall be established to allow the Board of Port Commissioners and the Alameda City Council' to report on and discuss joint Port and City projects and concerns. The. Joint Meetings shall only be required to be held for a period of two years, following execution of this Agreement arid shall be held no more frequE:lntly than once a year. If there is no material update to report, the Parties may mutually agree to cancel an annual update and extend the report period for an additional year, but in no event shall a Joint Committee meeting be required later than five years following the Port's application for a building permit for the new • terminal contemplated by the Project.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the new terminal is not constructed within five (5) years following execution of this Agreement, the Joint Committee may mutually agree to include one additional Joint Meeting prior to the start of construction of the new terminal (i.e., when the Port submits a building permit application to the - City of Oakland).
The Joint Meetings shall be administratively the responsibility of the City of Alameda including, but not limited to, reserving the meeting location(s), drafting _ the agenda, and providing accessible meetings.
B. FAA Coordination: The Port shall use its good faith best efforts to coordinate with the Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA") to maximize use of procedures to minimize noise impacts to surrounding communities and to educate air traffic control ("ATC") personnel at the Airport. The City of Alameda shall use its good faith best efforts to coordinate with the FAA to maximize use of procedures to minimize noise impacts to surrounding communities. . . 4 Plans
C. Coordinate with SFO Roundtable: The Port shall attend the • San Francisco International Airport ("SFO") Roundtable as feasible and advocate that SFO take actions re.commended by a majority of the Noise Forum members in accordance with the Noise Forum bylaws and other applicable laws and regulations. •
4. Project Status Reports, Periodic Noise Reports, and Traffic Control A. Project Status Report: The Port shall provide to the City and CLASS a detailed implementation schedule for the construction and activation of the new terminal ("Project Status Report") as soon as practicable and in any event, no later than at least 180 days prior to the start of construction on the new terminal. The Project Status Report shall include, but is not limited to information on the following:
i. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program compliance ii. Compliance with the OAK Noise Plan, including the provision of the Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report(s)
iii. Results of Air Quality monitoring (Section 6 A., below) iv. TOM Plan (Section 6 D., below)
At the request of City staff, but no earlier than thirty (30) days after the Project Status Report is prepared, the Port shall meet with City staff and make a public presentation to the Community of Harbor Bay Isle Owners' Association (CHBIOA) followed by a presentation to the City Council summarizing the findings in the Project Status Report. At the request of CLASS, Port staff shall meet with CLASS representatives to discuss the Project Status Report. Project status briefings will also be provided at the quarterly Airport Noise Forum and Aviation· Stakeholder Advisory Committee meeting, or other applicable regular OAK meetings held by the Port. Additionally, the Port will continue to produce and make available to the public reports detailing noise at OAK as outlined in the OAK Noise Plan.
B. Periodic Noise Status Reports: No sooner than three (3) years after the Port provides the Project Status Report described in the preceding paragraph, and once every three years thereafter as requested by the City or CLASS, the Port shall prepare a Periodic Noise Status Report. Each Periodic Noise Status Report shall include a rolling three-year trend chart for the aircraft noise abatement procedures to be presented by Port staff at a meeting of the Alameda City Council at the request by the City of Alameda. Each Periodic Noise Status Report shall also include a trend chart that documents the three-year quarterly values (number of aircraft flights and compliance percentages) demonstrating the overall effectiveness of the actions included-in the OAK Noise Plan. Within thirty (30) days after the presentation of each Periodic Noise Status Report to the City Council, CLASS or the City may request to meet and confer with the Port, in which case the 5 Parties shall meet and confer within thirty (30) days thereafter to discuss whether there are additional feasible measures that the Port could take to address any noise events identified in the Project Status Report.
C. Traffic Control Plans:
i. Operations. The Port shall develop a traffic control plan prior to construction of the new terminal that discourages travel through • the City of Alameda, other than by Alameda residents or Alameda businesses, for the purposes of reaching the Airport, where feasible.
ii. Construction. Prior to start of construction of the new terminal, the Port shall require contractors to prepare a traffic control plan as part of the Construction Safety and Phasing Plans (CSPPs) that is required for every construction project at the Airport. These traffic control plans shall include agreement on use of materials staging areas and designated haul routes.
5. Ongoing Applicability of Master Plan to the Project
By entering into this Agreement, the Port confirms, as of the execution of this Agreement, that the Master Plan,adopted by the Board of Port Commissioners in March 2006, continues to serve as a guiding planning document for OAK and the Project development. •
• 6. Installation of Air Monitors and Development of a Transportation Demand Management ("TDM") Program with Measures to Reduce Construction Impacts, Including Air Quality and GHG Emissions
A. Air Quality Monitoring: The Port shall install fence line air quality monitor(s) no later than one year after the opening of the new terminal and the monitor(s) shall be maintained for a period of five (5) years thereafter. The air quality monitoring program document shall be provided to the City. The Port shall include results of the Air Quality monitoring in the Project Status Report (Section
5.A, above).
B. Project Design: The Port maintains that it currently implements environmental initiatives that reduce emissions from its operations and incorporates sustainability design in development at OAK. Consistent with the Port's existing commitments, the Port shall comply with the City of Oakland's Green Building ordinance in effect at the time the building permit(s) are issued.
The Port shall incorporate into the design of the Project sustainable or environmentally responsible design methods, such as utilizing LEED, Envision, or other similar rating systems to guide the development of OAK-specific toolkits that would help integrate operational carbon reduction measures. • 6 C. Construction Vehicles: The Port maintains that it encourages contractors to utilize the best available zero emission technology to the extent feasible. Consistent with past practices during construction, the Port shall use Zero Emission Vehicles (ZEV) or Tier 4 construction equipment and renewable diesel fuel as feasible and commercially available. Contractors shall also be required to prepare an air quality management plan to reduce dust and air quality impacts from construction activities prior to the start of construction. This plan may include but is not limited to measures such as: an idling policy, speed limits, management of exposed surfaces, and monitoring of high wind conditions.
D. Transportation Demand Management {TOM) Plan: The Port shall prepare a TDM Plan prior to construction of the new terminal. The purpose of the TDM Plan is to focus on methods to influence travel behavior by encouraging the use of alternative modes of transportation and aiming to reduce traffic congestion and improve efficiencies. The specific components of the TOM Plan shall include, but are not limited to, providing information for employees such as alternative transportation options including rideshare programs and any available commuter benefits/ incentives for use of public transit. The TOM Plan shall also include measures to discourage trips originating outside the City of Alameda from tllSing City of Alameda local roads as a bypass route to access the Airport. These measures shall include the Port utilizing wayfinding and signage to direct vehicle traffic to access the Airport through primary access routes (98th Avenue and Hegenberger Road in Oakland). Parking lot access shall be addressed during design, and the Port shall evaluate the location and configuration of driveways to minimize impacts on adjacent roadways. In alignment with the TOM Plan and the Port's intent to avoid traffic impacts to the City of Alameda, the Port shall design access (ingress and egress) to the Upland Lot (as defined in the EIR) from Air Cargo Way to the extent feasible. However, this does not preclude the Port from designing a right turn exit only onto Ron Cowan Parkway from the Upland Lot. The access design to the Upland Lot (and the North Field Lot as defined in the EIR) shall take into account OAK operations, traffic and safety design standards, and shall not result in any new environmental impacts or increase to environmental impacts disclosed in the EIR. Furthermore, to the extent feasible, the Port shall collaborate with the City to seek preferential routing on online map platforms, to ensure that digital navigation services do not direct airport-bound traffic through Alameda.
E. Doolittle Drive Improvements: The Port shall continue to collaborate with the City of Alameda, the City of Oakland, East Bay Regional Park District, Caltrans, and the Oakland Alameda Adaptation Committee Community Partners on the Complete Streets Improvements on Doolittle Drive. The Port shall provide support for Caltrans' implementation of the project,, including providing Port resources, e.g., staffing or consulting resources, to complete the Caltrans-required Project Initiation Document.
7 F. Support of Unleaded Aviation Gasoline and Sustainable Aviation Fuel:
The Port promotes the use of unleaded aviation gas (Avgas) and the phase-out of leaded avgas. The Port shall continue to take reasonable steps to encourage use of unleaded Avgas as an option at OAK to the extent it is commercially available and technically feasible. Additionally, the Port shall continue to encourage airlines. serving OAK to increase their purchase and usage of sustainable aviation fuel ("SAF"). The Port has informed the Parties that OAK tenants are already increasing purchases of SAF: In 2024, approximately 5% of all jet fuel used by commercial airlines at OAK was SAF and approximately 15% of jet fuel used by business aviation at OAK was also SAF. The Parties recognize that the availability of the feedstocks • required to produce SAF is currently limited; however, the Port is working with and shall continue to work with SAF producers and distributors to understand and address the barriers to increased production and engage with airlines to promote additional SAF use at OAK.
7. Additional Terms
A. Covenant Not to Sue: In consideration for the promises set forth in this Agreement, the City and CLASS covenant and agree they will not file suit, assert any claim, or otherwise pursue or cause pursuit of a challenge to the Project described in the EIR or to any other environmental review (e.g., environmental review for the Project under the National Environment Policy Act), approval or perrnit by any governmental or administrative agency in connection with such Project, to the extent such other environmental review, approval or permit is consistent with and not in excess of the Project described in the EIR.
B. Mutual Release: In consideration for the promises set forth in this Agreement, except for the Parties' respective obligations expressly set forth in this Agreement, each of the Parties do hereby mutually release, acquit, and forever 1 discharge the other Party, from any and all claims, obligations, costs, expenses, . damages, losses, liabilities, suits, debts, demands, and benefits (including attorneys' fees and costs actually incurred) ("claims") of whatever character, in law or in equity, known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, matured or unmatured, of any kind or nature whatsoever, now existing, based on any act, omission, event, occurrence, or nonoccurrence giving rise to or related to the Project and dispute set forth in the Agreement recitals ..
C. Release of Unknown Claims: For the purpose of implementing a full and complete release, the Parties expressly acknowledge that the releases they give in this Agreement are intended to include in effect, without limitation, claims relating to the Project and dispute described in the recitals of which the Party had no knowledge existed or suspected existed in its favor at the time this Agreement is executed, regardless of whether the knowledge of such claims, or the facts upon which they might be based, would materially have affected the settlement of this matter, and that the consideration given under the Agreement was also for the 8 release of those claims and contemplates the extinguishment of any such unknown claims. In furtherance of the settlement, the Parties waive any right they may have under California Civil Code § 1542 (and other similar statutes and regulations), which states:
A general release does not extend to claims that the creditor or releasing party does not know or suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of executing the release and that, if known by him or her, would have materially affected his or her settlement with the debtor or released party.
D. Enforcement of Construction Conditions: To the extent feasible, the Port shall incorporate all construction-related requirements contained in this Agreement into applicable Requests for Proposals ("RFPs'\ bid specifications, and contract documents. such as the Construction Safety and Phasing Plans (CSPPs) to better as~ure implementation of such provisions.
E. Term: This Agreement shall remain in full force and effect unless and until it is terminated by written consent of all of the Parties.
F. Binding on. Successors: This Agreement shall be binding on the Parties and their successors, including but not limited to any successor government agencies or entities responsible for the operation of the Airport.
G. Reporting Requirements: If the Port determines that the reporting requirements under this Agreement are unduly burdensome, the Parties shall meet and confer in an attempt to modify the Agreement to reduce the reporting burden on Port while still providing the remaining Parties with the substance of the information provided by the prescribed reports.
H. Performance of Agreement:
i. The Parties each agree to do all things necessary or convenient to carry out and effectuate the terms of this Agreement and not to do anything that will interfere with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
ii. If a dispute arises concerning a Party's compliance with this Agreement, and if no exigent circumstances require immediate court proceedings, the Party asserting a breach shall provide notice of that assertion to the allegedly breaching Party. Within twenty-one (21) days of the receipt of that notice, if the circumstances constituting the alleged breach have not been cured and if no exigent circumstances require immediate court 9 proceedings, the Parties shall meet and confer to attempt in good faith to resolve the dispute.
I
I. Attorneys' Fees and Costs: Each Party shall bear its own attorneys' fees, costs, and other legai expenses incurred in connection with their disputes regarding the EIR and the preparation of this Agreement. In the event suit i,s brought or a claim is made to enforce this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorneys' fees and costs.
J. Mutually Drafted Agreement: Each of the Parties has been fully and competently represented by counsel of its own choosing in the negotiation and drafting of this Agreement. Accordingly, the Parties agree that any ruie of construction of contracts resolving any ambiguities against the drafting party shall be inapplicable to this Agreement. Further, each of the Parties acknowledges that it has read this entire document, including the attached exhibits, and fully understands its terms and effect.
• K. Integrated Agreement: This Agreement, together with the Earlier Settlement Agreements, contains the entire agreement of the Parties and supersedes any prior written or oral agreements or understandings.
Notwithstanding the preceding sentence and any other provision of this Agreement, this Agreement shall not supersede or modify any Party's rights or obligations under Earlier Settlement Agreements. None of the Parties is relying upon any promise, representation, or statement not contained in this Agreement.
The Parties acknowledge that this Agreement provides for the Parties to take actions 0r refrain from taking actions at different times, and that the taking or forbearance of certain of those actions, one accomplished, could not be undone.
Accordingly, the Parties expressly waive any potential right to seek to modify or vacate the terms of this Agreement, except by a further writing signed by each of the Parties. • •
L. No Third-Party Rights: This Agreement is not intended to, and shall not, create.any rights in favor of any persons other than the Parties.
M. Warranties of Authority: The signatories to this Agreement hereby represent and warrant that they are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of the parties for which they have all necessary lawful authority, and have taken all necessary actions, to execute this Agreement.
N. Press Statement: The Parties will jointly draft and issue a press statement regarding this Agreement, which will $erve as the basis for the Parties' responses to press inquiries. AIJ responses to press inquiries will be consistent with the content of the press statement. •
0. Notice: All notices required by this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed properly delivered, given, or served when (i) personally delivered 10 to a Party (ii) delivered by internationally recognized overnight courier service, or (iii) mailed by certified U.S. mail, postage prepaid, or (iv) by email, where receipt of the email is confirmed in writing, to the representative party to whom such notice is to be given at the following addresses, respectively:
To City:
City Manager
City of Alameda
2263 Santa Clara Avenue
Room 320
Alameda, CA 94501
[email protected]
To Port:
Executive Director
Port of Oakland
530 Water Street, 6th Floor
Oakland, CA 94607
[email protected]
To CLASS:
Robert "Perl" Perlmutter
Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger LLP
396 Hayes Street
San Francisco, CA 94102
[email protected]_m
With a copy to:
City Attorney
• City of Alameda
2263 Santa Clara Avenue
Room 280
Alameda, CA 94501
[email protected]
With a copy to:
Port Attorney
Port of Oakland
530 Water Street, 4th Floor
Oakland, CA 94607
[email protected]
[email protected]
With a copy to:
CLASS
3195 Mecartney Rd.
Alameda, CA 94502
[email protected]
P. Headings: Paragraph headings are for convenience only and are not a substantive part of this Agreement.
Q. Execution in Counterparts: This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of which together shall constitute an original or equivalent thereto. A signed copy of this Agreement delivered via email shall be deemed to have the same legal effect as delivery of an original signed copy.
[Signatures Continued on Next Page]
11 PORT OF OAKLAND
Dated: Mar 6, 2025 By:
p-;y-
Kristi McKenney (Mar 6, 2025 10:58 PST)
Kristi McKenney PA#: 2025-60
Executive Director Port Reso No.:
CITY OF ALAMEDA
Dated: By:
Jennifer Ott
City Manager
CITIZENS LEAGUE FOR AIRPORT
SAFETY AND SERENITY
Dated: Mar 5, 2025 By:
~~~
Jon W. Ha~S 18:14 PST)
Jon Hamilton
President
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
PORT OF OAKLAND
Mar 5, 2025 ~ -Dated: By:
Mary C. Richardson
Port Attorney
CITY OF ALAMEDA
Dated: By:
YIBIN SHEN
City Attorney
CITIZENS LEAGUE FOR AIRPORT
SAFETY AND SERENITY
Mar 5, 2025 'Robert Pert111utter
Dated: By: Robert Perlmutter (Mar 5, 202518:04 PST)
ROBERT "PER~ PERLMUTTER
Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger LLP
12 EXHIBIT A
[See Attached]
I ~ OAK
OAK Noise Plan
PREPARED BY: Port of Oakland
March 2025
OAK Noise Plan
TABLE OF CONTENTS
OAK Noise Plan Introduction .... . .. .. .. . . . .. . .. .. . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . .. . .. .. . . .. .. .... . . . .. .. .. . . ... . .. .. . .. .. Page 3 Section 1. Noise Abatement Procedure Summaries ............................................. Page 4.
Section 2. Quarterly Report Format .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .... .. .. .. .. .. Page 6 Section 3. Port ofOakland Reasonable Efforts .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. Page 7 Section 4. Definitions of Compliance Monitoring Terminology .. ...... .. . .... .. .. .. .... .... Page 9 Section 5. Noise Abatement Procedures (NAPs) ................................................. Page 10 Section 6. Updates to Noise Plan .... .. .. .. .. ...... ..... .. .... .. .. .... .... .. .. .... .. .... .... .. .... ..... Page 13 Appendices
1. Copy of Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report
2. Copy of Airport Operations Directive 615.5
3. Copy of Engine Run-up Report form
4. Copy of Tenant Acknowledgement Notice
5. Copy of FBO Pilot Welcome Letter
OAK Noise Plan Page 2 of 13
OAK Noise Plan
Introduction
Produced by the City of Oakland, a municipal corporation, acting by and through its Board of Port Commissioners ("Port of Oakland" or "Port") in collaboration with, and approved by, representatives of Citizens League for Airport Safety and Serenity (CLASS) and the City of Alameda (CITY) (collectively, the Parties).
The Oakland International Airport (OAK) Noise Plan is designed to meet certain requirements set forth by the (1) Amended and Restated Agreement entered into as of November 14, 2001 (Phase One Agreement); (2) the Phase Two Agreement entered into as of October 8, 2002 (Phase Two Agreement between the Port of Oakland, the City of Alameda, CLASS); and the March 19, 2025 Settlement Agreement between the Port of Oakland, City of Alameda and CLASS, collectively, the "Agreements" as well as additional procedures OAK has implemented to ac;tdress noise impacts from flight operations at OAK. • Contents of Aircraft Noise Mitigation Plan
Section 1:
Describes each of the aircraft noise abatement procedures included in the OAK Noise Plan and the Agreements. •
Section 2:
Provides a summarized review of the quarterly report format ( Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report) that generally applies to each element of the report
Section 3:
Provides a list of proactive or remedial actions that the Port has instituted and/or agrees to take as reasonable efforts intended to assure that aircraft operating at the Airport will comply with noise abatement procedures described in the OAK Noise Plan and the Agreements, to the extent permitted by applicable laws and regulations (hereafter, collectively, "applicable laws").
Section 4:
Provides a glossary or definitions of the terminology utilized to describe reasons for compliance and non-compliance provided in summary form in the comment sections of the noise abatement procedure reports.
Section 5:
Provides detailed compliance monitoring actions and the compliance reporting formats specific to each of the aircraft noise abatement procedures to be utilized by aircraft operating at the Airport.
Section 6:
Provides the process for updating the Noise Plan to implement new or modified noise abatement procedures or.make other appropriate changes. • OAK Noise Plan Page 3 of 13
Section 1. Noise Abatement Procedure Summaries
The following are summaries of the aircraft noise abatement procedures that are listed in Exhibit D of the Phase One Settlement Agreement. Each of these procedures shall be utilized by aircraft using the Airport, as appropriate, to the extent permitted by applicable law at the discretion of the FAA as long as the applicable procedures may be safely implemented. In addition, OAK posts "Fly Quiet Procedures" on the airport's website.
Items noted with an asterisk below are not specifically included in any settlement agreement but are additional measures created and implemented by the Port to reduce noise in communities surrounding OAK.
A. Engine Maintenance Run-Up Noise Limits
The Port maintains an aircraft engine run-up restriction policy at OAK under Operations Directive Number 616.5, as may be amended. Directive 616.5, the Aircraft Engine Maintenance Run-ups/Ground Run-up Enclosure Use Policy, is intended to ensure that engine run-up noise levels during the evening hours, from 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. should not exceed 75 decibels and from 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. engine run-up noise levels should not exceed 70 decibels, as measured by the Port's noise measurement system in residential areas of Bay Farm Island.
In 2002, the 1Port installed a $4.2 million Ground Run-Up Enclosure (GRE) facility, large enough to accommodate a Boeing 747 aircraft. The GRE reduces noise from engine maintenance by approximately 17 decibels and is leveraged to operate within the noise levels identified above. All aircraft operators subject to Operations Directive Number 616.5, should use the GRE to minimize the noise generated by Aircraft Engine Maintenance Run-ups/Ground Run-ups in accordance with Directive 616.5. Maximum noise levels are reviewed at the noise monitoring terminal located on Beach Road (NMT #15) when a power engine run-up occurs between 7:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. daily. A non-compliant engine run-up will equal or exceed Lmax 75 dB between 7:00 p.m. and 10:00 p.m. and will equal or exceed Lmax 70 dB between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m.
B. North Field VFR Aircraft Departure Procedure*
Noise abatement procedures for North Field VFR (Visual Flight RuJes), which are applicable 24/7 for aircraft departures from Runways 28R/L or 33 instruct pilots, safety permitting, to make a right crosswind turn over San Leandro Bay until reaching 1-880 (Nimitz Freeway) and continue per FAA air traffic control instructions.
Whenever safely possible, pilots are requested to avoid flying over nearby residential areas. A noncompliant departure is defined as a VFR departure from Runways 28R/L or 33 that flies over Alameda residential areas when it would have been safe to follow the VFR noise abatement procedure.
C. SILENT Departure Procedure
The SILENT departure is an FAA conventional instrument departure procedure at OAK, designed to reduce noise from turbojet and turbofan aircraft departures between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. The SILENT departure procedure is described as a turbojet aircraft take-off from Runway 30 that turns left on a heading of 270 degrees to intercept and proceed via the SFO R-342 (the San Francisco VOR1 342 degree radial).
Note that a 10-minute.buffer (10:00 p.m. to 10: 10 p.m. and 6:50 a.m. and 7:00 a.m) is applied to this procedure as aircraft anticipated to depart shortly before 10:00 p.m. or shortly after 7:00 a.m. might depart a few minutes before or after their expected departure time due to taxi time or unexpected delays. Buffer-time departures are noted in quarterly reports but are not considered non-compliant.
D. HUSSH Departure Procedure*
The HUSSH departure procedure is an FAA Area Navigation (RNAV)2 instrument departure procedure at OAK, designed to generally mimic the initial heading and noise reduction benefit of the SILENT departure.
This departure procedure, using satellite-based navigation technologies, is assigned between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. and requires departing aircraft to turn left towards the HUSSH waypoint, located near the middle of the Bay, before proceeding northbound up the middle of the Bay towards the NIITE waypoint. 1 Very High Frequency Omnidirectional Range (VOR) is a ground-based radio navigation system used by aircraft.
2 RNA V, or Area Navigation, is a method of navigation that permits aircraft operation on any desired flight path within the coverage of ground- or space-based navigation aids or within the limits of the capability of self-contained aids, or a combination of these.
OAK Noise Plan Page 4 of 13
E. SUNNE Departure Procedure*
The SUNNE departure procedure is a conventional departure used at nighttime that turns aircraft roughly 180 degrees to the left after departure, away from Alameda. Use of this procedure is limited due to conflicts with SFO arrivals but may be used when practicable.
Note that a 10-minute buffer (10:00 p.m. to 10: 10 p.m. and 6:50 a.m. and 7:00 a.m) is applied to this procedure as aircraft anticipated to depart shortly before 10:00 p.m. or shortly after 7:00 a.m. might depart a few minutes before or after their expected departure time due to taxi t_ime or unexpected delays. Buffer-time departures are noted in quarterly reports but are not considered non-complying.
F. OAKLAND Departure Procedure*
To reduce noise to areas near the departure end of Runway 30, OAK has collaborated with FAA to shift the initial heading of the OAKLAND departure procedure from 296 degrees to 290 degrees. This procedure , which is assigned to certain aircraft during the day (7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.), requires pilots to make a six degree left turn after departing OAK and reaching a s·afe altitude. Specific headings on this procedure may change from time to time due to magnetic shift or operational reasons.
G. North Field Quiet Hours Procedures (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) The Quiet Hours procedures provide recommendations to pilots using the North Field and is intended to minimize noise from 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. for residents living near OAK. To achieve this goal, a variety of noise abatement departure and arrival procedures and recommendations, to be utilized when safety, weather, and ATC instructions permit, have been developed for the North Field. These are:
1. Encouraging pilots of fixed and rotary wing aircraft to avoid-, as much as possible, flying over hotels and residential areas.
2. The use of the SALAD departure procedure from Runways 28L/28R
3. Runway 28L is the preferred landing runway.
4. Runways 10R and 28R are the preferred departure runways.
5. No left turn departures from Runways 10 L/R.
6. No straight out departures from Runway 10L.
7.AII aircraft over 75,000 pounds are directed to use Runways 12/30.
8. Use only full runway-length departures from the chosen North Field runway.
H. Preferential Runway Use Procedures (24-hour program) The North Field Preferential Runway Use noise abatement procedure states that the aircraft listed below should not depart at any time of the day from Runways 28R/L or land on Runways 1 0R/L, except during emergencies, when Runway 12/30 is not available closed for construction, maintenance, repairs, or by any cause beyoQd the control of the Port. Pilots are requested to use Runway 12/30 whenever possible. • Turbo-:iet and turbo-fan powered aircraft. •
• Turbo-prop aircraft over 17,000 pounds.
• Four-engine reciprocating powered aircraft.
• Surplus military aircraft over 12,500 pounds.
Regularly scheduled passenger and cargo airlines or regional jet commercial passenger aircraft operations shall not land on Runways 28UR at the North Field, except for emergencies or when Runway 12/30 is closed for maintenance or repairs. • •
I. Landing Airplanes (24-hour prograrn):
• On landings, avoid flying over residential areas as much as possible. • No straight-in land,ings to Runway 15, unless required by wind or safety conditions J. Touch & Go Operations (24-hour program): .
• Runway 28L is the preferred touch-and-go runway; fly counter-clockwise, making a left crosswind turn as soon as practicable
K. Daytime Operations (7:00 a.m. to 10:00p.m.):
• Departures off Runways 28R/L:
OAK Noise Plan Page 5 of 13
o Make right crosswind turn over San Leandro Bay until reaching 1-880 (Nimitz Freeway) and continue per ATC instructions.
o No straight out departures.
• Departures off Runway 33:
o Make right northerly turn over San Leandro Bay until reaching 1-880 Freeway and continue per A TC instructions.
o No straight out or left crosswind/downwind departures.
L. Other Noise Abatement techniques : OAK provides and will continue to provide on the OAK website, as appropriate, information related to general noise abatement recommendations such as those produced by the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA) and other pilot groups3. These recommendations are only general in nature and it is up to the pilot to determine whether or not following these procedures is advisable in any given situation as safety is paramount in any flight. Currently, OAK shares some of the following AOPA recommendations:
i. Avoid noise-sensitive areas to the extent practical
ii. Gain altitude as quickly as possible upon takeoff without compromising safety iii. Make first power reduction at 500' if consistent with safety iv. Modulate RPMs to reduce noise
v. Retract landing gear either as soon as landing straight ahead on the runway can no longer be accomplished or as soon as the aircraft achieves a positive rate of climb vi. Maintain best-angle-of-climb airspeed upon reaching 50' or an altitude that provides clearance from terrain or obstacles prior to accelerating to best-rate-of-climb airspeed Section 2. Quarterly Report Format
Section 4.4(e)(1) of the Phase One Agreement references a "quarterly written report" that the Port is to provide that identifies certain North Field operations or engine run-up events that do not conform with applicable noise abatement procedures, " ... identifying the persons responsible, explaining the reason for the deviation, describing the efforts taken by the Port to notify the responsible persons of the deviation and prevent future deviations by such persons, summarizing any response received by the Port, and appending a copy of any such written notification and response." The Port fulfills the quarterly written report requirement by producing the Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report , which shall be published four times per year, and which .may be modified from time to time as mutually agreed upon by the Port and the Noise Forum. The format of this report as of the publication of this document is shown on Appendix 5.
In keeping with the terminology the Parties have historically used in relation to the Phase One Agreement and the Phase Two Agreement, this Noise Plan uses the terms "compliant" and "non-compliant" to refer both to: a) actions the Port has the power to implement unilaterally, without the voluntary cooperation of third parties; and b) actions by third parties that the Port cannot require, e.g., adherence by pilots or airlines to desired noise abatement measures that are not mandated by laws or regulations. For avoidance of doubt, the Port is "in compliance" with the Agreements and the OAK Noise Plan if the Port has taken the actions that it is required to take (e.g., to issue a report or take a particular step to encourage pilots or airlines to implement a noise abatement procedure).A determination that a third party is not "in compliance" with a term of the Agreements or the OAK Noise Plan indicates that third party has not conformed with applicable noise abatement procedures; such a determination does not itself indicate a failure by any third parties to comply with any legal duty, whether created by law or regulation. Such a determination also does not itself indicate a failure by the Port to comply with any legal duty, whether created by law or regulation, or by the terms of the Agreements and the OAK Noise Plan, although it may be relevant to whether the Port has fulfilled other obligations in the Agreements or the OAK Noise Plan
A. Following is a description of the prescribed format for the Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report (Report).
The Report provides introductory statements regarding roles and responsibilities , safety concerns and a general disclaimer. Specifically, the Report currently includes:
1. A summary description of each noise abatement procedure. 3 https://www .aopa .org/-/media/Files / AOP A/Home / Advocacy / AOP ANoiseSteps.pdf OAK Noise Plan Page 6 of 13
2. Subject to approval of the Noise Forum, an explanation in the description section identifying the actions Port staff shall take· for non-compliant activity.
3. A glossary of the terms or classifications that are utilized to explain the differences between compliant and non-compliant aircraft operations and pilot or air traffic controller actions. All exempted actions that apply to any particular procedure will also be identified and described.
4. A summary table for each noise abatement procedure which identifies statistical information on relevant aircraft operations and the number of complying versus non-complying operations. A performance value shall be provided in terms of the percentage of activity that conformed with the requirements of a particular procedure. •
5. A list of all non-compliant or exempt aircraft operations for each procedure along with a summarized explanation for any non-compliant or exempt activity. The information shall include the date and time of the activity, aircraft type, flight number and/or aircraft registration number (if available), flight • destination if available, and runway used. Exempted aircraft operations shall include an explanation as to why the flight was exempted from a noise abatement procedure.
6. The Port will mai_ntain records indicating when written communication was made with aircraft operators who may be responsible for any non-compliant activity for a period of no less than two years. The Port will maintain records documenting any written communications made with any aircraft owner/operator of a non-compliant aircraft event for a period of no less than two years. The Parties may review the communication documentation upon request.
B. Other Reports
1. Noise abatement procedure performance data shall periodically be used for compliance trend analysis. •
2. The number and type of qutreach activities conducted by the Port will be provided periodically to the Forum.
Section 3. Port of Oakland Reasonable Efforts
The Port has included in this Noise Plan certain efforts undertaken by the Port to demonstrate the Port's reasonable and good faith, best efforts to enhance program effectiveness. Such actions shall include:
1. Conducting pilot outreach and engagement.
2. Contacting non-compliant operators. The Port reaches out to non-compliant operators advising them of noise abatement procedures in an effort to eliminate repeated non-compliance. Such communication is intended to be timely, and ideally within three business days. In the event an operator commits several noncom pliant actions, the Port will consult with the Forum and/or the North Field/South Field Research Group to explore methods of mitigating the likelihood of future incidents.
3. Conducting timely compliance monitoring with best efforts to issue a letter, email, or phone call within 3 business days of the non-compliant event.
J
4. Continuously upgrading ANOMS as ne.cessary to automate the process of identifying noncompliant aircraft to the greatest extent possible ..
5. Ensuring the Port has access to a database of registered aircraft operators, enabling prompt response to non-compliant activities.
6. Maintaining a recording system of radio frequencies as necessary to ensure aircraft compliance of noise abatement procedures can be determined. Port shall periodically, as necessary, review tower recordings of instructions on non-compliant departures from the North Field to help determine whether additional outreach/engagement needs to happen with FAA staff to encourage pilot compliance with NAPs.
7. Update OAK website as necessary to improve pilot access to NAPs and OAK's other noise abatement efforts.
8. Exploring the use of other technology to improve pilot knowledge of, and compliance with, NAPs.
OAK Noise Plan Page 7 of 13
9. The Port shall not, without approval from the Noise Forum, create or modify any categories of aircraft operations as presented in the quarterly reports that determine the compliance of a particular operation.
A. Program non-compliance notification procedures
The Port will take specific actions when any aircraft activities at the Airport do not comply with the Port's aircraft noise abatement procedures. Most actions will consist of documented communication to FAA air traffic control or the owner/operator of the aircraft involved with any non-complying operations. This comrnunication is intended to not only reinforce noise abatement procedures but to provide education to pilots and controllers aboutthe importance of such procedures. The actions taken by the Port will follow the "reasonable effort" methodology described above and may vary according to the nature of the noise abatement procedure, the reason for the non-compliant activity, the level of attention required for the most desirable results, and whether or not a pilot or operator has specifically identified to the Port that they do not intend to follow noise-abatement procedures even though they are aware of their existence.
B. Communications with the Federal Aviation Administration In accordance with Section 4.4 of the Phase One Agreement and Section 4.2 of the Phase Two Agreement, the Port shall take the following steps with respect to the Port's communications and interactions with the FAA:
1. Sponsor Northern California TRACON Tours in coordination with, and subject to the approval of, the NorCal TRACON for accommodation; a minimum of one tour will be scheduled annually as long as there is sufficient interest and participation by the Noise Forum or with an airfield research group. or community members.
2. Issue periodic reminders to FAA air traffic control management to encourage implementation of noise abatement procedures on Southeast Plan operations.
3. Communicate with FAA promptly as problems with compliance with the noise abatement procedures are identified or arise.
4. Maintain, Airport Operations Manager, or designee, meetings with local Air Traffic Control Tower (ATCT) Management.
5. Request and encourage FAA representation at airport research group and Noise Forum Meetings.
6. Offer educational sessions to air traffic controllers as needed to heighten awareness of the aircraft noise abatement program and the importance of and reasons to support the program and encourage their suggestions regarding implementation of noise abatement procedures.
C. Distribution of noise abatement information to fixed base operators and flight schools AAs necessary, update and distribute aircraft noise abatement procedure information to all fixed base operators and flight schools at OAK. In these materials, the Port, subject to the limitations of applicable laws, shall urge each such operator to use its good faith, best efforts to encourage compliance with these procedures. The Port will provide and maintain other educational materials at FBO facilities as needed.
D. Request signed acknowledgments from all existing and future lessees Following the Phase One Agreement, Port staff conducted a year-long program in 2002 to acquire signed acknowledgements from tenants of the receipt of the notification from the Port, urging aircraft operators, subject to the limitations of applicable laws, to use their good faith, best efforts to comply with the noise abatement procedures. The Port has developed an updated acknowledgement form, which may be updated from time to time, and shall distribute it to existing and future tenants in accordance with the provisions of Section 4.4(e)(2) of the Phase One Agreement.
In addition, the Port will schedule briefings, and/or provide information, to all new corporate tenants who operate aircraft or flight service enterprises to review the Port's aircraft noise abatement procedures.
E. Education & outreach programs
The Port shall conduct routine educational meetings with pilots, FAA ATCT staff, FBOs and other flight service providers operating at the Airport to increase compliance with noise abatement procedures. The following provisions shall apply to education and outreach programs:
1. Pilot and/or airport user educational outreach programs will be offered as needed. Port shall invite Noise Forum to attend.
OAK Noise Plan Page 8 of 13
2. Education and outreach meetings will be structured to promote awareness of applicable aircraft noise abatement procedures. The most recent quarterly noise abatement program report statistics will be provided at education and outreach meetings. •
3. Port shall provide season-specific outreach efforts, as necessary, to advise FAA of the likelihood of Southeast Plan operations between the months of October and March to ensure they understand noise procedures related to jet arrivals on the North Field. • \
4. The Port shall continue to publish multimedia content related to noise abatement procedures on its website and other platforms utilized by pilots.
5. The Port shall offer educational sessions to FAA air traffic controllers as needed, subject to approval by the FAA, to heighten awareness of noise procedures, to identify the importance of supporting the noise program, and to solicit input in methods for improving noise procedures at OAK
6. The Port shall offer educational sessions to members of the Noise Forum and members of associated subcommittees.
7. The Port shall conduct outreach to the City in advance of large scheduled events that are hosted at OAK, such as Fleet Week.
F. Research Groups and activities
The Port shall continue to research and consider development of program enhancements or additional noise abatement procedures that may be implemented safely and in compliance with applicable laws, in cooperation with the memberships of the Noise Forum, the North Field and South Field Research Groups and.other groups and/or noise-related committees that may be formed from time to time. Port staff, or consultant, should regularly conduct research on noise abatement programs at other airports and, to the extent they can provide benefit at OAK, discuss those measures in the Noise Forum and/or North Field/South Field research groups.
G. Performance monitoring and trend analysis
On at least an annual basis, or as otherwise determined by the Forum, the Port shall produce a rolling three year trend chart for the aircraft noise abatement procedures to be presented to the Parties and other community representatives at the airport research group meetings. The trend chart will report the three-year quarterly values (number of aircraft flights and compliance percentages) and shall be utilized to measure the overall effectiveness of the actions included in this OAK Noise Plan. This analysis will assist the program stakeholders to determine if any further steps should be taken to improve noise abatement procedures, e.g. additional research and development. Potential additional actions may include enhanced or expanded monitoring activity as welf as a discontinuation of monitoring activities in the event it is unnecessary to maintain compliance actions due to the success of a procedure or the termination of an operational activity (e.g. airlines do not perform training flights any longer at OAK).
H. Optional action by the Parties
In the event that noise abatement procedure performance levels for operations at the Airport are unacceptable to the Parties, at the request of the Parties, the Port shall schedule a consultation meeting with the Parties at which meeting the Port and the Parties shall consider recommendations for modifying or expanding any of the current noise abatement procedures in this OAK Noise Plan. • Section 4. Compliance Monitoring Terminology
The Noise/Environmental Conformance Office reviews flight track data and air traffic control communications' recordings, along with other data resources, to determine compliance with aircraft noise abatement procedures. This support information is reported in the var,ious lists that document aircraft landing and departures relevant to the noise abatement procedures that are monitored for compliance. Comments are provided in these lists that summarize the circumstances or the reason that most appropriately explains the Port's determination as to whether or not the aircraft flight was complying or non-complying with noise abatement procedures. Terms and definitions used in the Quarterly Noise Reports may be amended from time to time as mutually agreed upon by the Port and the Forum. • OAK Noise Plan Page 9 of 13
Section 5. Noise Abatement Procedures
5.1. Engine Maintenance Run-Up Noise Limits
A. Procedure Information
Maximum noise levels shall be reviewed at the permanent noise microphone located on Beach Road (RMT #15) adjacent to the Airport when a power engine run-up occurs between 7:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. daily.
Aircraft engine run-up information is correlated to maximum noise level data collected from RMT 15. A non compliant engine run-up equals or exceeds 75 dB (Lmax) between 7:00 p.m. and 10:00 p.m. and 70 dB (Lmax) between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m.
B. Airport Operations Directive
Airport Directive 616.5, current version.
C. Applicable Forms
See Appendix 3.
D. Compliance Monitoring
Airport Operations staff are required to maintain activity reports for all engine maintenance run-ups. Port staff shall continue to review these reports and noise measurements at RMT 15 to determine if any noise events exceed the established noise level restrictions during any aircraft engine maintenance run-up that is performed during the evening and nighttime hours. Staff shall compare the engine run-up activity reports with noise measurements generated at both RMT 15 and RMT 16 (located in the Ground Run-up Enclosure (GRE).
If a non-compliant run-up occurs, the Port staff investigates the occurrence and coordinates with Airport Operations and the aircraft operator/airline to minimize future non-compliant run-up operations. Historically noise measurements exceeding the limit are rare and those noise levels were only slightly higher than the established limit. Noise measurements above the noise limits may be caused by any number of factors, including weather conditions or conditions beyond the control of any aircraft operator, and engine run-ups have historically been a rare source of non-compliance with the noise abatement procedure.
E. Report Format
Engine Maintenance Run-up Procedure reports shall provide a summary table that provides the number of engine maintenance run-ups performed under the evening and nighttime procedures, individually, for each month along with the number of run-ups that created noise measurements that exceeded the maximum level allowed. The report shall provide a complete listing of all engine run-ups for the calendar quarter along with information on the operator, aircraft type, engine power levels, date and time of activity, and the location where the run-up was performed.
5.2. North Field VFR Aircraft Departure Procedures
A. Procedure Information
This report provides information on noncompliant VFR aircraft departures compared to all flights recorded by ANOMS during the calendar quarter reported. A noncompliant departure is defined as a VFR departure from Runways 28R/L or 33 that flies over Alameda residential areas when it would have been safe to follow the VFR noise abatement procedure.
Many VFR aircraft that fly over Alameda residences on departure from the North Field may need to do so in order to maintain safe separation from other general aviation aircraft flying in the vicinity of the airport. Often aircraft on arrival flight patterns from the north and east of the airport are flying in directions opposite from those aircraft that are departing from the North Field. In these circumstances, departing VFR aircraft are considered to be in compliance with the noise abatement procedure.
B. Compliance Monitoring
ANOMS identifies aircraft departures that fly VFR over residential areas in Alameda or Bay Farm Island. Port staff reviews each flight track for such departures, using the flight replay feature, to determine if any potential airspace conflict may have occurred resulting in a compliant aircraft departure. In any event where an aircraft is determined to be not in compliance with the noise abatement procedure, the Port will make best efforts to contact the owner/operators.
OAK Noise Plan Page 10 of 13
C. Report Format
The report includes a table that summarizes compliance with VFR aircraft noise abatement departure procedures for the reported calendar quarter, along with similar tables for each month of the calendar quarter.
The summary table also provides the number of total VFR and IFR aircraft departures and the runways used for these departures. A procedure performance percentage is provided on the compliance rate.
The report also includes a table listing all VFR aircraft departures that flew over residential areas of Alameda and identifies non-compliant aircraft departures and departures considered to be compliant. Explanatory comments are provided regarding the reason why the aircraft departure was determined to be compliant.
5.3. Silent Departure Procedure
A. Procedure Information
When flying the Silent departure procedure, aircraft are further from residential areas and there is less aircraft noise impact on residences than there would be when departing aircraft fly straight out over the San Francisco Bay on a runway heading. When safe to do so, the FAA air traffic controllers assign this departure procedure between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. for turbojet aircraft departures.
Although the Silent departure procedure is assigned to turbojet aircraft that depart off Runway 30 between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m., a buffer zone of ten minutes is applied for monitoring performance. Turbojet aircraft departures between 10:00 p.m. and 10:10 p.m., as well as those between 6:50 a.m. and 7:00 a.m., are considered meeting the noise abatement departure procedure even if they do not fly the Silent departure procedure. These "buffer zone" departures will be identified and appear in the tables in the report in black text, while the aircraft that are identified as noncom pliant will appear in red text.
The buffer zone is appiied because two different air traffic controllers may be involved in directing a pilot on departure from the airport. The "clearance delivery" air traffic controller is the first controller who'instructs the pilot prior to taxiing to the runway and assigns the departure procedure. The second air traffic controller is responsible for directing the aircraft onto taxiways and releasing the aircraft onto the runway for departure.
Several minutes may pass between instructions from one controller to the next and aircraft normally scheduled to depart before 10:00 p.m. and are not assigned the Silent departure procedure may be delayed a few minutes and depart shortly after 10:00 p,m .. In a similar situation, turbojet aircraft that are scheduled to depart after 7:00 a.m. may depart a few minutes earlier than the actual scheduled time.
B. Compliance Monitoring
Non-compliance with the Silent departure procedure occurs when a turbojet aircraft, departing from Runway 30, does not make the initial 270 degrees heading turn and/or passes over Alameda instead of following. the Silent departure pattern up the San Francisco Bay. ANOMS filters out those aircraft deemed not to have flown the procedure as designed.
Non-compliance is reported to the FAA Air Traffic Control Tower to encourage communications that would help minimize. the number of future non-compliant departures. Since the FAA is responsible for assigning the Silent departure procedure to a pilot, non-compliance is not reported to the air carrier involved unless the incidence is determined to be the fault of the pilot. Note: Due to a historically consistent high compliance rate (99%) with the Silent Departure Procedure, the Port does not routinely communicate with the FAA ATC or the air carriers.
C. Report Format
This rep9rt includes a summary table for nighttime Runway 30 turbojet aircraft departures and Silent departure compliance performance based upon the percentage those departures that follow the Silent . departure procedure. The report also includes a list of all Silent noncompliant departures which separately identifies any "buffer zone" departures. Flight track maps are also included displaying all Silent noncompliant departures for each month during the reported calendar quarter.
5.4. North Field Quiet Hours Procedures (10 PM to 7 AM) A. Procedure Information
The Quiet Hours procedures provide recommendations to pilots using the North Field on runway use and a choice of departure procedures. If the procedures are flown as intended, aircraft will avoid flying over nearby residential areas on Bay Farm Island, East End Alameda, and the Davis WesUTimothy Drive area of San Leandro between the hours of 10:00 p.rn. and 7:00 a.m.
OAK Noise Plan Page 11 of 13
Pilots are requested to avoid flying over nearby residential areas when landing or departing the North Field and to follow prescribed procedures when safety, weather and ATC instructions permit. These procedures include: •
• Runways 1 OR and 28R being designated as the preferred departure runways. • Left turns from Runways 1 OR/Lare discouraged.
• Straight out Runway 1 0L departures are discouraged.
• All aircraft over 75,000 pounds are requested to use Runways 12/30. • Full-length departures from the chosen North Field Runway are encouraged.
For VFR and I FR aircraft departures using Runway 1 0R/L, pilots may choose from the following departure procedures, wind and weather permitting:
• For Runway 10R departures, pilots are requested to use the 140-180 degree departure headings when able for E/SE-bound departures or continue to fly right turns over the airport for NINE-bound departures when able from Runways 10R or 10L.
For nighttime landings, pilots are advised that Runway 28L is the preferred runway. For all nighttime flights, pilots are advised to fly aircraft, including helicopters, over freeways and water as much as possible to avoid flying over hotels and residential areas.
B. Compliance Monitoring
The ANOMS filters out all aircraft departures that fly over residential areas during the Quiet Hours in Alameda, Bay Farm Island or the Davis West/Timothy Drive areas of San Leandro. Port staff reviews each flight track, using the ANOMS flight replay feature, to determine if an airspace conflict may have occurred. An aircraft departure is considered compliant if there was a potential airspace conflict or if it is otherwise exempted. If the aircraft is determined to be non-compliant with the noise abatement procedure, the Port will mail a letter to or e-mail the aircraft owner/operator to advise them of the non-compliant flight and to provide educational material. The Port shall continue to make best efforts to ensure that the letter or email and educational material is received by the intended recipient.
C. Report Format
The Quiet Hours report includes a table that summarizes compliance with the North Field Quiet Hours aircraft noise abatement procedure for the reported calendar quarter by each month. The report also includes a table listing all aircraft departures that flew over residential areas of Alameda. Explanatory'comments are provided for non-compliant aircraft departures as well as for the aircraft that are exempt from the procedure to explain the reason why the aircraft departure was determined to be compliant. Flight track maps are also provided.
5.5. Preferential Runway Use Procedures
A. Procedure Information
Neither the Airport nor the FAA Air Traffic Controllers may restrict a pilot's access to an available runway based solely on noise considerations. However, the Port will advise FAA ATCT staff and pilots and operators that turbo-jet and turbo-fan powered aircraft, four engine reciprocating powered aircraft, and turbo-prop aircraft over 17,000 pounds, and surplus military aircraft over 12,500 pounds should not, at any time, depart from ' Runway 28R/L or land on Runway 1 0R/L, except during emergencies or when Runway 12/30 is not available.
The Port will provide a community advisory and will publish on the OAK website an advisory of any work on Runway 12/30 that is more than minimal and that will cause Runway 12/30 to be closed; provided, however, that no notice shall be given when the Port closes Runway 12/30 after midr:iight on Monday mornings for routine maintenance and inspections.
B. Compliance Monitoring
AN OMS filters out any aircraft departures or landings that do not appear to meet the requirements of the preferential runway use procedure. Port staff reviews each flight track, sometimes using the flight replay feature, and the audio recordings of the ATC and pilot communications to determine the cause for the noncompliant aircraft flight. In any event where an aircraft is determined to be not in compliance with the noise abatement procedure, the Port will mail a letter to or e-mail the aircraft owner/operator or the FAA ATC to advise them of the non-compliant flight and to provide educational material. The Port shall continue to make best efforts to ensure that the letter or email and educational material is received by the intended recipient.
OAK Noise Plan Page 12 of 13
C. Report Format
The report includes two tables that summarize compliance with the Preferential Runway Use Procedures for the reported calendar quarter by month. One table summarizes North Field jet departure (or any other noncompliant aircraft departure) activity and provides compliance performance statistics. Another table summarizes North Field jet landing (or any other non-compliant aircraft landing) activity and provides compliance performance statistics. The report also includes a table listing all non-compliant and exempted aircraft departures or landings that flew over residential areas of Alameda along with explanatory comments.
6. Updates to OAK Noise Plan
The format and content of the various reports listed in this Noise Plan are subject to change upon approval by the Noise Forum, and the Parties agree to review and update the document as necessary to reflect any modifications or refinements required over time. In addition.the Port may update this Noise Plan from time to time to incorporate changes to FAA laws and regulations and to implement new best practices in aircraft noise abatement. Before updating this Plan, the Port shall bring the changes to the Noise Forum for discussion. In the event the Parties believe the proposed amendments are inconsistent in any manner with the prior settlement agreements, at the request of the Parties, the Port shall schedule a consultation meeting with the Parties at which meeting the Port and the Parties shall consider recommendations for modifying the amendments to comply with such settlement agreements.
OAK Noise Plan Page 13 of 13
APPENDIX 1
[See Attached]
((ID) PORT OF OAKLAND
Seaport. Airport. Everyone's Port.
I ~ OAK
The best way to San Francisco Bay.
Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report
Fourth Quarter 2024
Prepared by
Oakland Airport (OAK)
Noise/Environmental Compliance Office
January 9, 2025
Table of Contents
(Click on a link below for direct access.)
QUARTERLY AIRCRAFT NOISE REPORT INTRODUCTION
QUARTERLY REPORTS SUMMARY TABLE
NORTH FIELD REPORTS
1. !et Aircraft Departure Procedure for Runways 28R/L
2. Iet Aircraft Landing Procedure for Runways 10R/L
3. North Field VFR Aircraft Departure Procedure
4. North Field Quiet Hours Procedures
5. North Field Quiet Hours SEL Report
SOUTH FIELD REPORTS
6. Runway 30 BFI Right Turn Departure Procedure
7. Night Time Departure Procedure
8. Rolling Take-off Night Departure Procedure
9. Runway 12 Night Departure Procedure
10. Engine Run-up Program
11. Runway 30 East Turn Departure Procedure
12. Cross Over 100 Degree Radial Procedure
MONTHLY AIRCRAFT NOISE COMPLAINT REPORTS
AIRPORT OPERATIONS SUMMARY TABLES
DEFINITIONS OF TERMINOLOGY FOR COMPLIANCE MONITORING
APPENDICES
• Iet Aircraft Departure List for Calendar Quarter
• Iet Aircraft Landing List for Calendar Quarter
• North Field VFR Departure List for Calendar Quarter
• North Field Quiet Hours Departure List for Calendar Quarter • North Field Quiet Hours SEL List for Calendar Quarter • Runway 30 BFI Right Turn Departure List for Calendar Quarter • Night Time Departure List for Calendar Quarter
• Runway 12 Night Departure List for Calendar Quarter
• Engine Run up List for Calendar Quarter
Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report Page 2 of 53
Page
4 5
6 7
7 8
10, 11
12 12
13 14
15 15
16 17,18, 19
20 23
Al
Fourth Quarter 2025
• Runway 30 East Turn Departure List
• Cross Over 100 Degree Radial List
• Sample noncompliance letter for Jet Aircraft Departure Program • Sample noncompliance letter for Jet Aircraft Landing Program • Sample noncompliance letter for NF VFR Departure Program • Sample noncompliance letter for NF Quiet Hours Program Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report Page 3 of 53 Fourth Quarter 2025
QUARTERLY REPORT INTRODUCTION
The Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report presents compliance monitoring information on various aircraft noise abatement programs managed by the Noise/Environmental Compliance Office at OAK as required by various settlement agreements with local communities. In addition a variety of other aircraft noise reduction and aircraft operational reports are included. These noise abatement programs are designed to reduce the impacts of aircraft noise on communities near OAK.
COMPLIANCE BEYOND THE CONTROL OF THE PORT OF OAKLAND
Noise abatement procedures (NAP) at OAK are based upon a number of voluntary actions that air traffic controllers and pilots may take to help reduce the impacts of aircraft noise on communities adjacent to the airport. The airport has no authority in regards to the movement of aircraft or the direction of flight. The authority to regulate flight patterns of aircraft is vested exclusively in the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). FAA air traffic controllers have the responsibility for directing aircraft on the ground and in flight and the pilot in command has the final authority as to the safe flight of her /his aircraft. Pilots in command make the final decisions relative to runway use; therefore, pilots may request to use any available runway. Neither the Airport nor the FAA air traffic controllers may restrict a pilot's access to an available runway.
SAFETY COMES FIRST
Safety always takes precedence over noise abatement procedures and pilots must follow air traffic control instructions and other safety considerations caused by weather, potential air space conflicts or emergencies. FAA may advise pilots or pilots may determine on their own that there is another nearby aircraft that must be avoided to maintain safe aircraft separation. Safe separation of aircraft may result in a flight over residential areas. Military, law enforcement and medical aircraft flights also may have an operational need to fly over residential areas and are exempt from the noise abatement procedures.
DISCLAIMER
The Port of Oakland's Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System (AN OMS) is the source of the data used in this report. Although f.\NOMS is a very sophisticated computer program that provides a state-of-the-art solution for monitoring aircraft operations, problems with the system's data integration and analysis programs occasionally cause erroneous information or loss of data. Usually errors are minimal and are limited to such things as aircraft departure assignment to an inappropriate runway designation or providing incomplete aircraft identification information regarding a specific flight track.
Also, the Federal Aviation Administration allows for certain tolerances in the accuracy of radar data, and ANOMS relies on FAA air traffic control radar data for its database and reporting capability. At times flight track data is lost due to FAA or Port of Oakland equipment failure. Since the NorCal TRACON radar equipment was updated in October 2002, radar data has been very consistent and more complete than in the past. Airport staff carefully reviews the data for accuracy and will make corrections whenever possible
Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report Page 4 of 53 Fourth Quarter 2025
QUARTERLY REPORTS COMPLIANCE COMPARISON SUMMARY TABLE
The compliance monitoring summary table below provides a comparison of the noise abatement procedure compliance rate statistics of the current calendar quarter with the previous year's calendar quarter report.
Compliance Monitoring Quarterly Summary Comparison
Fourth Quarter 2024
2023Q4 2024Q4
Com pl. N/C Compl. N/C
Runway 28R/L Jet Departure Compliance 93% 7% 93% 7%
Total Airport-wide Corporate Jet Departures 2,111 154 2,306 165 Runway 10R/L Jet Landing Compliance 83% 17% 88% 12%
Total Southeast Plan Corporate Jet Landings 163 33 204 29 North Field VFR Departure Compliance 92% 8% 90% 10%
Total Runways 28R/l & 33 Departures 228 19 386 45
North Field Quiet Hours Compliance 82% 18% 86% 14%
Total North Field Quiet Hours Departures 206 46 226 36
Runway 30 BFI Right Turn Departure Compliance 100% 0% 100% 0% Total Runway 30 Turbojet Departures 15,637 2 14,696 9
Night Time Departure Compliance 99% 1% 99% 1%
Total Runway 30 Night Turbojet Departures 3,260 30 2,791 34 Runway 12 Night Departure Compliance 60% 40% 98% 2%
Total Runway 12 Night Turbojet Departures 32 21 131 2
Runway 30 East Turn Departure Compliance 100% 0% 100% 0% Total Runway 30 East Turn Departures 3,943 3 3,434 0
100 Degree Radial Turbojet Landing Compliance 98% 2% 99% 1% Total 100 Degree Radial Turbojet Landings 1,005 19 682 7 Engine Runup Program Compliance 100% 0% 100% 0%
Total Evening and Nighttime Engine Runups 14 0 10 0
Note: N/C means non-compliant. Percentage values are rounded out. (Return to Table of Contents)
Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report Page 5 of 53 Fourth Quarter 2025
NORTH FIELD REPORTS
NORTH FIELD PREFERENTIAL RUNWAY USE PROCEDURES
The North Field Preferential Runway Use noise abatement procedure program states that the following aircraft should not depart from Runways 28R/L, nor land on Runways lOR/L, except during emergencies, whenever Runways 12/30 are closed or by any cause beyond the control of the Airport.
• Turbo-jet and turbo-fan powered aircraft.
• Turbo-props over 17,000 pounds.
• Four-engine reciprocating powered aircraft.
• Surplus military aircraft over 12,500 pounds.
For the purposes of this report and noise abatement procedure, a corporate jet is defined as a jet aircraft whose typical activities are associated with the North Field facilities and services.
This could include jet aircraft weighing over 75,000 lbs.
RUNWAY 28R/L JET AIRCRAFT DEPARTURE NOISE ABATEMENT PROCEDURE To measure the compliance rate for the jet departure noise abatement procedure, only corporate or charter jet aircraft using facilities at the North Field are evaluated and included in the number of flights (airport-wide corporate jet departures). Charter or air carrier-type aircraft may not be included in the total number of compliant departures, but will be included as a non-compliant departure when they occur.
Runway 28R/L Jet Departure Procedure
Compliance Summary
Fourth Quarter 2024
October November December Quarterly
Airport-wide Corporate Jet Departures 801 801 869 2,471 Com pliant Corporate Jet Departures 737 754 815 2,306
Non-com pliant Corporate Jet Departures 64 47 54 165
Corporate Jet Departure Compliance Rate 92% 94% 94% 93% Excused Jet Departures 55 17 31 103
The section below corrpares corrpliance perforrrance to airport-wide jet departures.
Airport-wide Jet Departures 5,516 5,232 5,480 16,228
Com pliant Airport-wide Jet Departures 5,452 5,185 5,426 16,063 Non-compliant Airport-wide Jet Departures 64 47 54 165
Airport-wide Jet Departure Compliance Rate 99% 99% 99% 99% (Return to Table of Contents)
Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report Page 6 of 53 Fourth Quarter 2025 RUNWAY 1OR/L JET AIRCRAFT LANDING NOISE ABATEMENT PROCEDURE To measure the compliance rate for the jet landing noise abatement procedure, only corporate or charter jet aircraft using facilities at the North Field are evaluated and included in the number of flights (SE Plan corporate jet landings). Charter or air carrier-type aircraft may not be included in the total number of compliant landings, but will be included as a non-compliant landing when they occur.
Jet Aircraft Landing NAP for Runway 10R/L
Compliance Summary
Fourth Quarter 2024
October November December Quarterly
Southeast (SE) Plan Corporate Jet Landings• 0 150 83 233 Com pliant SE Plan Corporate Jet Landings 0 129 75 204
Non-com pliant SE Plan Corporate Jet Landings 0 21 8 29 SE Plan Corporate Jet Landing Compliance Rate NIA 86% 90% 88% The section below corrpares corrpliance performance to total airport-wide SE Ran jet landings.
Airport-wide SE Plan Jet Landings 0 716 447 1,163
Airport-wide Com pliant SE Plan Jet Landings 0 695 439 1,134 Airport-wide Non-compliant SE Plan Landings 0 21 8 29
Airport-wide Jet Landing SEPlanCompliance Rate NIA 97% 98% 98% • Note: During Southeast Aan, business jets rray land on Runways 10R/L and 12. (Return to Table of Contents)
NORTH FIELD VFR AIRCRAFT DEPARTURE PROCEDURE
The North Field VFR (visual flight rules) noise abatement procedure is designed for Runways 28R/L or 33 aircraft departures to minimize flights over residential areas of Alameda. Pilots are instructed to make a right turn over San Leandro Bay until reaching Interstate 880. A noncom pliant departure is defined as a VFR departure from Runways 28R/L or 33 that flies over Alameda residential areas when it may have been safe to follow the VFR noise abatement procedure.
North Field VFR Aircraft Departure NAP
Compliance Summary
Fourth Quarter 2024
October November December Quarterly
Total VFR Departures 207 107 117 431
Total VFRDepartures Over Alameda 64 55 49 168
Com pliant Departures 189 94 103 386
Non-com pliant Departures 18 13 14 45
Compliance Rate 91% 88% 88% 90%
(Return to Table of Contents)
Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report Page 7 of 53 Fourth Quarter 2025
NORTH FIELD QUIET HOURS PROCEDURES
The North Field Quiet Hours Procedures were designed to minimize aircraft noise on residential areas adjacent to the North Field from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. daily. If the procedures are flown as intended, aircraft will avoid flying over nearby residential areas on Bay Farm Island, the Fernside area of Alameda, the Davis West/Timothy Drive and Neptune drive areas of San Leandro.
Pilots are requested to follow these procedures when safety, weather and ATC instructions permit:
• Runways l0R and 28R are the preferred departure runways. • No left turns from Runways l0R/L.
• No straight out departures from Runway l0L.
• All aircraft over 75,000 pounds are directed to use Runways 12/30. • Use only full-length departures from the chosen North Field Runway. • VFR and SALAD !FR departures from Runway 28R
• The VFR departure shall include a right crosswind or additional downwind segment avoiding Bay Farm Island and the main island of Alameda. • The SALAD Instrument Departure Procedure is designed for aircraft to climb out on departure to a right turn heading to the east, which will normally prevent aircraft flying over residential areas of Alameda and Bay farm Island.
• For VFR and !FR Runway l0R/L departures, pilots are requested to use the 180 degree departure heading when able for E/SE-bound departures or continue to fly right turns over the airport for N/NE-bound departures .
• Runway 28L is the preferred landing runway.
North Field Quiet Hours Compliance Summary
(10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.)
Fourth Quarter 2024
October November December Quarterly
Total Night Departures (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) 107 95 60 262 Com pliant Night Departures 96 80 50 226
Average Compliant Departures per Night 3.1 2.6 1.6 2.48 Non-Compliant Night Departures 11 15 10 36
Average Non-Com pliant Departures per Night 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.4 Night Departure Compliance Rate 90% 84% 83% 86%
(Return to Table of Contents)
NIGHTTIME SEL NOISE MEASUREMENTS REPORT
The Nighttime SEL Noise Measurements Report provides a summary of aircraft departure noise measurements of SEL (sound exposure level) that are equal to or greater than 80 dB (decibels). The data is being reported in this format to simplify the aircraft noise event review process by focusing on the most significant noise events and to the levels that may cause sleep disturbance for some residents in adjacent communities. All aircraft noise measurements between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. are evaluated in this report. Supplementary tables 2 and 3 provide data for aircraft departure Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report Page 8 of 53 Fourth Quarter 2025 noise measurements based upon the runway used for departure. (Note: All community-based NMTs are included in the report with the exception of NMT 15, which is used for monitoring compliance with the aircraft engine maintenance run-up noise abatement program. For this purpose, noise measurements at NMT 15 are correlated with those at NMT 16 during aircraft engine run-up activities conducted in the Ground Run-up Enclosure or GRE.) Noise Monitor Terminal (NMT) Locations
(Return to Table of Contents)
Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report Page 9 of 53 Fourth Quarter 2025 Table 1. North Field Night Aircraft Departure SEL Noise Measurements Total Aircraft Departures= 262
Fourth Quarter 2024 (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.)
Aircraft Noise Events Aircraft Noise Events Aircraft Noise Events Total NMT Aircraft Noise SB. 80 - 84.9 dBA SB. 85 - 89.9 dBA SB. l!:90 dBA Aircraft Number Events Below Noise SB. 80 dBA Amount Nightly As Percentage Amount Nightly As Percentage Amount Nightly As Percentage Events Average of Departures Average of Departures Average of Departures 1 2 1 0.0 0.2% 0 0.0 0.0% 0 0.0 0.0% 3
2 0 0 0.0 0.0% 0 0 .0 0.0% 0 0.0 0.0% 0
3 49 3 0 .0 0.5% 0 0 .0 0.0% 0 0.0 0.0% 52
4 93 76 0.8 13.4% 48 0.5 8.5% 16 0.2 2.8% 233
5 109 25 0.3 4.4% 14 0.2 2.5% 22 0.2 3.9% 170
6 60 8 0 .1 1.4% 16 0.2 2.8% 12 0.1 2.1% 96
7 17 12 0.1 2.1% 13 0.1 2.3% 3 0.0 0.5% 45
8 53 19 0.2 3.4% 3 0 .0 0.5% 0 0.0 0.0% 75
9 17 10 0.1 1.8% 5 0.1 0.9% 1 0.0 0.2% 33
10 136 43 0.5 7.6% 3 0.0 0.5% 1 0.0 0.2% 183
11 4 2 0.0 0.4% 0 0 .0 0.0% 1 0.0 0.2% 7
12 12 7 0 .1 1.2% 1 0 .0 0.2% 0 0.0 0.0% 20
13 9 0 0 .0 0.0% 0 0.0 0.0% 0 0.0 0.0% 9
14 87 0 0 .0 0.0% 1 0 .0 0.2% 0 0.0 0.0% 88
All NMTs 648 206 2 0 104 1 0 56 1 0 1014
(Return to Table of Contents)
Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report Page 10 of 53 Fourth Quarter 2025 Table 2. Aircraft SEL Noise Measurements in Alameda - Total Aircraft Departures= 234 Fourth Quarter 2024 (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.)
Aircraft Noise Events Aircraft Noise Events Aircraft Noise Events Total NMT Aircraft Noise SB. 80 - 84.9 dBA SB. 85 - 89.9 dBA SB.~ 90 dBA Aircraft Number Events Below Noise
SB. 80 dBA Amount Nightly As Percentage Amount Nightly As Percentage Amount Nightly As Percentage Average of Departures Average of Departures Average of Departures Events 3 49 3 0.0 1.3% 0 0.0 0.0% 0 0.0 0.0% 52
4 93 76 0.8 31.8% 48 0.5 20.1% 16 0.2 6.7% 233
5 109 25 0.3 10.5% 14 0.2 5.9% 22 0.2 9.2% 170
6 60 8 0.1 3.3% 16 0.2 6.7% 12 0.1 5.0% 96
7 17 12 0.1 5.0% 13 0.1 5.4% 3 0.0 1.3% 45
8 53 19 0.2 7.9% 3 0 .0 1.3% 0 0.0 0.0% 75
Total 381 143 1.6 94 1.0 53 0.6 671
Table 3. Aircraft SEL Noise Measurements in San Leandro - Total Aircraft Departures= 28 Fourth Quarter 2024 (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.)
Aircraft Noise Events Aircraft Noise Events Aircraft Noise Events Total NMT Aircraft Noise SB. 80 - 84.9 dBA SB. 85 - 89.9 dBA SB.~ 90 dBA Aircraft Number Events Below Noise SB. 80 dBA Amount Nightly As Percentage Amount Nightly As Percentage Amount Nightly As Percentage Average of Departures Average of Departures Average of Departures Events 2 0 0 0.0 0.0% 0 0.0 0.0% 0 0.0 0.0% 0
9 17 10 0.1 3.0% 5 0.1 1.5% 1 0.0 0.3% 33
10 136 43 0.5 13.1% 3 0.0 0.9% 1 0 .0 0.3% 183
11 4 2 0.0 0.6% 0 0.0 0.0% 1 0.0 0.3% 7
12 12 7 0.1 2.1% 1 0 .0 0.3% 0 0.0 0.0% 20
13 9 0 0.0 0.0% 0 0 .0 0.0% 0 0.0 0.0% 9
14 87 0 0 .0 0.0% 1 0 .0 0.3% 0 0 .0 0.0% 88
Total 265 62 0.7 10 0.1 3 0.0 340
(Return to Table of Contents)
Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report Page 11 of 53 Fourth Quarter 2025
SOUTH FIELD REPORTS
RUNWAY 30 BFI RIGHT TURN DEPARTURE PROCEDURE
Turbojet aircraft should not make a right turn on departure from Runway 30 and pass over Bay Farm Island. This noise abatement procedure is historically referred to as the "No Right Turn Climb-out Departure Procedure".
Runway 30 Bay Farm Right Turn Departure Procedure
Compliance Summary
Fourth Quarter 2024
October November December Quarterly
Runway 30 Turbojet Departures 5,393 4,417 4,895 14,705
Com pliant Departures 5,392 4,409 4,895 14,696
Non-compliant Departures 1 8 0 9
Percentage of Non-compliance 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.1%
Compliance Rate 100% 100% 100% 100%
(Return to Table of Contents)
NIGHT TIME DEPARTURE PROCEDURE
The HUSSH departure is a FAA (RNAV) departure procedure at OAK established to reduce noise on residential communities at nighttime. The HUSSH departure procedure is described as a turbojet aircraft take-off from Runway 30 climb heading 296 degrees to at or above 520 feet, then left turn direct HUSSH This departure procedure is assigned between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. for Runway 30 turbojet aircraft departures.
Night Time Procedure Departure NAP
Compliance Summary 10:00 pm - 7:00 am
Fourth Quarter 2024
October November December Quarterly
Runway 30 Nighttime Turbojet Departures 1,084 851 890 2,825 Buffer Time Departures 12 4 10 26
Com pliant Departures 1,076 836 879 2,791
Non-com pliant Departures 8 15 11 34
HUSSH gate misses 3 10 8 21
NIITE gate misses 6 11 9 26
REBAS gate misses 8 15 11 34
Compliance Rate 99% 98% 99% 99%
(Return to Table of Contents)
Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report Page 12 of 53 Fourth Quarter 2025
ROLLING TAKE - OFF NIGHT DEPARTURE PROCEDURE FOR FEDEX
The rolling takeoff noise abatement departure procedure was designed to reduce the impacts to San Leandro residents from back-blast noise generated by late night Runway 30 departures of FedEx jet aircraft between the hours of 1:00 a.m. and 5:00 a.m. Aircraft noise measurements taken at NMT #2, located at the San Leandro Marina, are compared with those measurements taken in 2002 prior to implementation of the noise abatement procedure. During late nighttime hours, an air traffic controller will give "departure clearance" as the aircraft is entering the runway so that the aircraft will continue its departure roll down the runway without stopping. This action is considered a rolling takeoff.
The first table below provides the noise measurements for this current calendar quarter whereas the second table provides the noise measurements for the previous year's calendar quarter for comparison purposes. The chart provides a representation of the seasonal comparative changes.
The Report is dependent on back-blast data collected by the noise monitor deployed at the San Leandro Marina {NMT #2). Due to construction work at the San Leandro Marina, the noise monitor had to be removed on April 20. 2023. The monitor will be redeployed once works are complete. This report cannot be created .
(Return to Table of Contents)
Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report Page 13 of 53 Fourth Quarter 2025 Summary of Calendar Quarter of Previous Year
The Report is dependent on back-blast data collected by the noise monitor deployed at the San Leandro Marina (NMT #2). Due to construction work at the San Leandro Marina, the noise monitor had to be removed on April 20, 2023 . The monitor will be redeployed once works are complete. This report cannot be created.
(Return to Table of Contents)
RUNWAY 12 NIGHT DEPARTURE PROCEDURE
The Runway 12 Night Departure Procedure is an informal radial heading departure procedure at Oakland International Airport established to reduce noise on San Leandro residential communities at nighttime. Turbojet aircraft should depart from Runway 12 and make a right turn to a heading of 140 degrees between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m.
Runway 12 Night Departure NAP Compliance Summary
(10:00 PM to 7:00 AM)
Fourth Quarter 2024
October November December Quarterly
Jet Departures 0 2 131 133
Non-Com pliant Departures 0 1 1 2
Com pliant Departures 0 1 130 131
Compliance Rate No SE Plan 50% 99% 98%
Note: The noise abaterrent procedure is officially implerrented between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m nightly. (Return to Table of Contents)
ENGINE RUN-UP PROCEDURE PROGRAM
The Port of Oakland maintains an aircraft engine run-up procedure policy at OAK and regulates enforcement of the program under Operations Directive Number 616.5. The directive requires regulation of all engine run-ups for aircraft over 12,500 pounds and all military type aircraft and specifies the location and time-of-day for this activity. Maximum noise levels are reviewed at the noise monitoring terminal located on Beach Road (NMT #15) when a power engine run-up occurs between 7:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. daily. A non-compliant engine run-up will equal or exceed Lmax 75 dB between 7:00 p.m. and 10:00 p.m. and will equal or exceed Lmax 70 dB between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m ..
Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report Page 14 of 53 Fourth Quarter 2025 Engine Run-up Program
Fourth Quarter 2024
' October November December Quarter
Runups - 7:00 PM to 10:00 PM 1 1 3 5
Runups Greater Than 75 dBA 0 0 0 0
Runups -10:00 PM to 7:00 AM 2 2 1 5
Runups Greater Than 70 dBA 0 0 0 0
Total Evening and Nighttime Runups 3 3 4 10
Total Non-compliant Runups 0 0 0 0
Compliance Rate 100% 100% 100% 100%
(Return to Table of Contents)
RUNWAY 30 EAST TURN DEPARTURES PROCEDURE
Runway 30 turbojet departures should not turn right over Alameda residential areas until reaching 3,000 feet above airport ground level.
Runway 30 East Turn Departures at 3,000 feet Procedure
Compliance Summary
Fourth Quarter 2024
October November December Quarterly
Total Runway 30 East Turn Turbojet 1,311 936 1,187 3,434 Deoartures Non-com pliant Turbojet Departures 0 0 0 0
Total Turbojet Aircraft Above 2,900 Feet 1,311 936 1,187 3,434 ASL* Compliance Rate 100% 100% 100% 100%
Excused Turbojet Departures 21 3 1 25
Note: A tolerance factor that accounts _for potential errors in aircraft altttude measurements of 100 feet is applied on any aircraft passing through the gate so that aircraft below 2,900 feet are to be flagged as non-compliant. (Return to Table of Contents)
Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report Page 15 of 53 Fourth Quarter 2025 100 DEGREE RADIAL TURBOJET LANDING PROCEDURE
For Runway 30 downwind approaches over the East Bay, turbojet aircraft should not be descended below 3,000 feet above airport ground level until crossing the OAK 100 degree radial.
Cross Over 100 Degree Radial at 3,000 Feet Procedure
Compliance Summary
Fourth Quarter 2024
October November December Quarterly
Turbojets on Downwind RNY 30 Approach 263 204 222 689
Non-com pliant Turbojets 1 3 3 7
Total Turbojet Aircraft Above 3K Feet ASL• 262 201 219 682 Compliance Rate 100% 99% 99% 99%
Note: A tolerance factor that accounts for potential errors in aircraft alt~ude measurements of 100 feet is applied on any aircraft passing through the gate so that aircraft below 2,900 feet are to be flagged as non-compliant. (Return to Table of Contents)
Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report Page 16 of 53 Fourth Quarter 2025 Oakland Airport (OAK)
Noise Complaint Summary
October 2024
Community Callers Complaints
A larreda( BFO 45 324
Alarreda(Central) 5 29
Albany 0 0
Berkeley 5 455
Castro Valley 2 36
Fremont 0 0
Hayward 3 7
Kensington 0 0
Oakland 9 2555
Piedmont 0 0
Richmond 2 32
San Francisco 4 20
San Leandro 1 1
Union City 1 22
San Lorenzo 1 1
Other Communtties 12 43
Total 90 3525
Com plaints by Type
E-mail 2460
View point App 1065
Com plaints by Time of Day
Day ( 0700 - 1900) 889
Evening ( 1900 - 2200) 991
Night ( 2200 - 0700) 1645
Com plaints by Type of Operation
Arrivals 2301
Departures 1017
Over-flights 134
Touch & Go 73
Not Linked to an Operation 0
Com plaints by Type of Aircraft
Business Jet 294
Helicopter 54
Jet 2721
Military 0
Not Reported (not linked to an aircraft) 0
Other (Type information not available) 33
Propeller 370
Turbo-prop 53
(Return to Table of Contents)
Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report Page 17 of 53 Fourth Quarter 2025 Oakland Airport (OAK)
Noise Complaint Summary
November 2024
Community Callers co·m plaints
Alameda(BFO 29 322
Alameda(Central) 4 46
Albany 0 0
Berkeley 2 289
Castro Valley 1 20
Fremont 0 0
Hayward 1 1
Kensington 0 0
Oakland 9 1790
Piedmont 0 0
Richmond 2 292
San Francisco 0 0
San Leandro 3 16
Union City 1 4
San Lorenzo 0 0
Other Corrmunities 10 26
Total 62 2806
Com plaints by Type
E-mail 2079
View point App 727
Com plaints by Time of Day
Day ( 0700 - 1900) 820
Evening ( 1900 - 2200 ) 899
Night ( 2200 - 0700 ) 1087
Com plaints by Type of Ope ration
Arrivals 1591
Departures 1054
Over-flights 56
Touch & Go 105
Not Linked to an Operation 0
Com plaints by Type of Aircraft
Business Jet 128
Helicopter 17
Jet 2358
Military 0
Not Reported (not linked to an aircraft) 0
Other (Type information not available) 25
Propeller 227
Turbo-prop 51
(Return to Table of Contents)
Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report Page 18 of 53 Fourth Quarter 2025 Oakland Airport (OAK)
Noise Complaint Summary
December 2024
Community Callers Complaints
Alameda(BFI) 36 569
Alameda(Central) 15 60
Albany 0 0
Berkeley 1 435
Castro Valley 2 25
Fremont 0 0
Hayward 0 0
Kensington 0 0
Oakland 9 3211
Piedmont 0 0
Richmond 2 288
San Francisco 0 0
San Leandro 1 12
Union City \ 1 4
San Lorenzo 0 0
Other Communities 9 36
Total 76 4640
Com plaints by Type
E-mail 3348
View point App 1292
Com plaints by Time of Day
Day ( 0700 - 1900) 639
Evening ( 1900 - 2200 ) 884
Night ( 2200 - 0700 ) 3117
Com plaints by Type of Operation
Arrivals 3266
Departures 1288
Over-flights 47
Touch & Go 39
Not Linked to an Operation 0
Com plaints by Type of Aircraft
Business Jet 190
Helicopter 31
Jet 4223
Military 0
Not Reported (not linked to an aircraft) 0
Other (Type information not available) 18
Propeller 106
Turbo-prop 72
(Return to Table of Contents)
Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report Page 19 of 53 Fourth Quarter 2025
AIRPORT OPERATIONS SUMMARY TABLES
Note: The source of the data provided in the summary tables below is the Port of Oakland's Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System or AN OMS.
Operations Table 1. Provides a summary of North Field aircraft departures by runway as well as the volume of aircraft departures relative to the direction of air traffic flow during nighttime hours .
North Field Night Departures by Runway
(10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.)
Fourth Quarter 2024
October November December Quarterly Percentage
Runway 28L 8 2 6 16 15%
Runway 28R 30 22 19 71 65%
Runway 33 1 0 1 2 2%
Alameda Overflights 39 24 26 89 82%
Runway 10L 1 3 2 6 6%
Runway 10R 0 10 3 13 12%
Runway 15 1 0 0 1 1%
San Leandro Overflights 2 13 5 20 18%
Total Departures 41 37 31 109 100%
Operations Table 2. Provides a summary of North Field aircraft departures by runway as well as by the number of IFR versus VFR departures
North Field VFR/IFR Departures by Runway
Fourth Quarter 2024
October November December 2024
VFR Departures
Runway 28L 7 4 0 11
Runway 28R 27 26 26 79
Runway 33 26 14 18 58
VFR Departures 60 44 44 148
IFR Departures
Runway 28L 238 114 128 480
Runway 28R 214 201 248 663
Runway 33 18 9 26 53
IFR Departures 470 324 402 1,196
Total Departures 530 368 446 1,344
(Return to Table of Contents)
Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report Page 20 of 53 Fourth Quarter 2025 Operations Table 3. Runway Us"e by Aircraft Category
OAK Aircraft Operations by Category and Runway
Fourth Quarter 2024
Aircraft Category
12 30 South Field 15 33 10L 10R 28L 28R PAD1 North Field Grand Total Corporate Jets 190 122 - - - 4 39 330 1,770 - 2,143 2,143 Helicopters - 1 1 - - - - - - 87 87 88
Commercial Jets 840 11,702 12,542 - - - - 56 8 - 64 12,606 Military - - - - - - - - - - - -
Arrivals
Propeller 1 2 3 13 54 20 5 151 • 1,049 - 1,292 1,295
Regional Jets 88 446 534 - - - 2 29 562 - 593 1,127
Turboprops - 46 46 2 - 19 45 274 559 - 899 945
Unknown - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sub-totals 1,119 12,319 13,126 15 54 43 91 840 3,948 87 5,078 18,204 Corporate Jets 42 1,963 2,005 - 4 17 193 127 125 - 466 2,471 Helicopters - - - - - - - - - 88 88 88
Commercial Jets 913 11,703 12,616 - - - - 9 3 - 12 12,628 Military - - - - - - - - - - - -
Departures
Propeller - 4 4 66 664 17 3 48 533 - 1,331 1,335
Regional Jets 79 1,039 1,118 - - - 7 1 2 - 10 1,128
Turboprops - 7 7 1 16 49 29 383 454 - 932 939
Unknown - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sub-totals 1,034 14,716 15,750 67 684 83 232 568 1,117 88 2,839 18,589 Touch & Go Sub-totals - 14 14 7 399 15 - 55 676 1 1,153 1,167 Grand Total 2,153 27,049 28,890 89 1,137 141 323 1,463 5,741 176 9,070 37,960 Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report Page 21 of 53 Fourth Quarter 2025 Operations Table 4. Runway Use by Jet Aircraft Category
RUNWAYS
Aircraft Category
Fourth Quarter 2024
12 30 South Field 15 33 10L 10R 28L 28R PAD1 North Field Grand Total Comrrercial Jets 840 11 ,702 12,542 - - - - 56 8 - 64 12,606 Arrivals
Regional Jets 88 446 534 - - - 2 29 562 - 593 1,127
Commercial Jet Sub-totals 928 12,148 13,076 - - - 2 85 570 - 657 13,733 Corporate Jets 190 122 312 - - 4 39 330 1,770 - 2,143 2,455 All Jet Arrivals Sub-totals 1,118 12,270 13,388 - - 4 41 415 2,340 - 2,800 16,188 Comrrercial Jets 913 11,703 12,616 - - - - 9 3 - 12 12,628 Departures
Regional Jets 79 1,039 1,118 - - - 7 1 2 - 10 1,128
Commercial Jet Sub-totals 992 12,742 13,734 - - - 7 10 5 - 22 13,756 Corporate Jets 42 1,963 2,005 - 4 17 193 127 125 - 466 2,471 All Jet Departures Sub-totals 1,034 14,705 15,739 - 4 17 200 137 130 - 488 16,227 Grand Total 2,152 26,975 29,127 - 4 21 241 552 2,470 - 3,288 32,415 (Return to Table of Contents)
Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report Page 22 of 53 Fourth Quarter 2025
DEFINITIONS OF TERMINOLOGY USED IN COMPLIANCE MONITORING COMMENT SECTION The Noise/Environmental Compliance Office reviews flight track data and air traffic control communications' recordings, along with other data resources, to determine compliance with aircraft noise abatement procedures. This support information is reported in the various lists that document aircraft landing and departures relevant to the noise abatement procedures that are monitored for compliance. Comments are provided in these lists that summarize the circumstances or the reason that most appropriately explains the reviewer's determination as to whether or not the aircraft flight was compliant or non-compliant with noise abatement procedures. The definitions of the summarized comments or terms are described below.
Airspace Conflict Potential: Pilot or air traffic controller may have needed to maintain safe separation between a non-compliant aircraft and other aircraft in the vicinity of the airport. (Separation of aircraft: some aircraft are able to decrease speed better than others or fly faster than other aircraft and reach minimum safe separation from aircraft in front or behind. These conditions, although rare, are very difficult to avoid.) These situations may occur when aircraft depart from the North Field on a VFR flight or when jets land on Runway 12 during Southeast Plan traffic flow. In these circumstances the reviewer has made a determination, based upon visual evidence, that the flight, which would normally be considered non-compliant, is exempt for safety considerations.
Air Traffic Conflict: The reviewer has found clear and specific evidence that the pilot or air traffic controller was required to maintain safe separation between a non-compliant aircraft and other aircraft in the vicinity of the airport. (Separation of aircraft: some aircraft are able to decrease speed better than others or fly faster than other aircraft and reach minimum safe separation from aircraft in front or behind. These conditions, although rare, are very difficult to avoid.) These situations may occur, for example, when aircraft depart from the North Field on a VFR flight or when jets land on Runway 12 during Southeast Plan traffic flow and an air traffic controller diverts the jet to land on the North Field. In these circumstances the flight, which would normally be considered non- com pliant, is exempt for safety considerations.
ATC Did Not Advise: Refers to an aircraft flight compliance determination investigation when the air traffic controller does not cite or improperly cites the pilot instructions to use Runway 12/30 for noise abatement. The Air Traffic Control ("ATC") audio file(s) should be used for documentation.
In this event, the ATC rather than the aircraft owner or operator will be notified of non-compliance with the noise compliance procedures.
ATC Instructions: Refers to an aircraft flight compliance determination investigation when the air traffic controller instructs a pilot to perform an action that could be for safety or traffic flow reasons. The ATC audio file(s) should be used for documentation. In this event, the aircraft operations and air traffic control are considered in compliance with the noise abatement procedure. N Number not included because the non-compliant flight was solely due to ATC Instructions.
Audio Not Available: Refers to an aircraft flight compliance determination investigation when the ATC audio file is lost or unusable due to a recording system technical failure. In this event, the associated flight is considered not in compliance with the noise abatement procedure even though there may otherwise be a specific reason that could have exempted the flight from a determination of non-compliance.
Audio Not Reviewed: Refers to an aircraft flight compliance determination investigation when the ATC audio file has not been reviewed for some reason other than for a technical failure of the Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report Page 23 of 53 Fourth Quarter 2025 recording system. In this event, the associated flight is considered not in compliance with the noise abatement procedure even though there may be a specific reason that could have exempted the flight from a determination of non-compliance.
Departure Timing: An air traffic controller may instruct a pilot to depart from Runways 28R/L to hasten a departure time in order to maintain an appropriate flow or departure time to avoid aircraft delays. This activity or action will be investigated to determine if the aircraft flight was in compliance with noise abatement procedures. N Number not included because the non-compliant flight was solely due to ATC Instructions.
Excused by Reprocessing: The reviewer has found clear and specific evidence through flight replay or flight track analysis that a flight was compliant with the airport noise abatement program.
These conditions are rare but do happen on occasions. These situations may occur, for example, when a flight has to perform a go around to land on a runway, which then may fly through multiple noise abatement procedure gates. In these circumstances the reviewer has made a determination, based upon visual evidence, that the flight, which would normally be considered non-compliant, is exempt.
Flight Replay Not Reviewed: Refers to an aircraft flight compliance determination investigation when the NOMS flight replay was not employed to review the aircraft flight for airspace use or safety reasons. In this event, the associated flight is considered not in compliance with the noise abatement procedure even though there may be a specific reason that could have exempted the flight from a determination of non-compliance.
IFR Training: Some aircraft are departing VFR (Visual Flight Rules apply) but the pilots or student pilots may be practicing flying IFR (Instrument Flight Rules specified by the FM for flight under weather conditions in which visual reference cannot be made to the ground and the pilot must rely on instruments to fly and navigate) in which case the pilots direct departing aircraft in a specific heading (i.e. 310 degrees). Based upon the aircraft departure trajectory (straight-line departure at approximately 310 degrees heading), the reviewer may judge that an aircraft flight is a potential IFR training flight. This aircraft departure will be considered compliant with noise abatement procedures.
Law Enforcement: An aircraft piloted by law enforcement officials may need to divert from the noise abatement procedure due to public safety concerns or to perform their law enforcement duties. Law enforcement aircraft flights over residential areas are considered exempt from noise abatement procedures due to the nature of the mission and operational necessity.
Lifeguard Medical: Medical operations such as organ or patient transportation are exempt from noise abatement procedures due to the nature of the mission and operational necessity.
Not Acceptable: This term is used to describe an aircraft that was not in compliance with one of the airport's voluntary aircraft noise abatement procedures. These aircraft departures or arrivals are considered to be non-compliant with noise abatement procedures unless determined to be exempt for a specific reason as judged by the reviewer.
Pilot Refusal: Although air traffic controllers normally instruct jet aircraft pilots to taxi to Runway 30 to depart for noise abatement purposes, FM regulations allow pilots to refuse departure from Runways 28R/L. Typically, the jet aircraft pilots notified the Port of Oakland that they will no longer taxi to Runway 30 for departure for operation consideration. Pilot refusal are considered not in compliance with the noise abatement procedures.
Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report Page 24 of 53 Fourth Quarter 2025 Pilot Request: Although air traffic controllers normally instruct jet aircraft pilots to taxi to Runway 30 to depart for noise abatement purposes, FAA regulations allow pilots to request departure from Runways 28R/L. Also, FAA air traffic controllers at Northern California TRACON or the OAK Control Tower normally guide jet aircraft to land on Runway 12 during the Southeast Plan air traffic pattern. However, pilots may request to land on Runways 10R/L when safe conditions exist. Pilot requests are normally granted although these requests are considered not in compliance with the noise abatement procedures.
Runway Maintenance: This term is used when the either the South Field or North Field runways are closed due to construction, maintenance, Foreign Object Debris (FOD) removal, runway repair, or an emergency.
Runway /Taxiway Maintenance: This term is used when the either the South Field or North Field taxiways are closed due to construction, maintenance, Foreign Object Debris (FOD) removal, runway repair, or an emergency.
Southeast Plan Constraints: An aircraft may land on Runway 10R/L to alleviate airspace congestion due to Southeast Plan constraints on Runway 12. In this event, flight replay or ATC recordings is reviewed to determine if there were constraints on Runway 12. The associated flight is considered in compliance with the noise abatement program for constraint and safety reasons.
South Field Closure/Repair: The South Field (Runway 12/30) was closed due to construction, maintenance, Foreign Object Debris (FOD) removal, runway repair, or an emergency. Routine South Field maintenance is scheduled each Monday between 12:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. because there are the fewest scheduled air carrier flights during that time, which minimizes the need to use the North Field. Aircraft flights normally considered to be non-compliant would be exempt from complying with any relevant noise abatement procedures in the event of the closure of the South Field run~ay.
Special Event: An air traffic controller may instruct a pilot to depart from Runways 28R/L after a special event i.e. Super Bowl, NBA Finals to hasten a departure time in order to maintain an appropriate flow or departure time to avoid aircraft delays. This activity or action will be investigated to determine if the aircraft flight was in complianc.e with noise abatement procedures.
N Number not included because the non-compliant flight was solely due to ATC Instructions.
Straight Out: This term describes a non-compliant aircraft flight that departs with a runway heading departure from R~nways 10R/L or,28R/L and flew over nearby residential areas.
System Error: This term is used to describe an aircraft operation that is recognized incorrectly by NOMS system. For example, an aircraft arrival may be assigned an operation type departure. This aircraft operation will be considered compliant with noise abatement procedures.
Temporary Flight Restriction (TFR): A Temporary Flight Restriction (TFR) is a type of Notices to Airmen (NOT AM). A TFR defines an area restricted to air travel due to a hazardous condition, a special event, or a general warning for the entire FAA airspace. The associated flight is considered in compliance with the noise abatement program for constraint and safety reasons.
Time Buffer: Aircraft departures from 10:00 tol0:10 p.m. and from 6:50 to 7:00 a.m. fall within the long established "buffer time period" in which an aircraft flight is not considered non-compliant with noise abatement procedures even though the flight would normally be non-compliant during the nighttime hours. These flights will be deemed exempt from the procedures as the departure was slightly delayed or slightly ahead of the scheduled time as fixed by the air traffic controller who Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report Page 25 of 53 Fourth Quarter 2025 provides clearance instructions to the pilot. Although the actual scheduled time of departure is between 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m., the aircraft is released to the runway either early or too late.
VFR Departure: This term is used to describe an aircraft assumed to be flying under Visual Flight Rules (VFR) on departure and flew over nearby residential areas. These aircraft departures are considered to be non-compliant with noise abatement procedures unless determined to be exempt for a specific reason as judged by the reviewer.
Wide Salad: This term is applied by the reviewer when an aircraft flies a SALAD ONE departure turn but the turn was wide and resulted in a flight over Alameda residential areas. The reviewer would determine that this flight is non-compliant with noise abatement procedures. 315 Degree Heading: This term is used to describe an aircraft that the reviewer assumed was flown under either IFR or VFR and made a turn to a 315 degree heading flying over nearby residential areas. These aircraft departures are considered to be non-compliant with noise abatement procedures unless determined to be exempt for a specific reason as judged by the reviewer.
Nighttime SEL Noise Measurement Summary Definitions
These terms are used in the Nighttime SEL Report.
Lmax (maximum sound level): the Lmax metric represents the highest instantaneous noise level heard at a receiver site during a single aircraft event (arrival or departure). However, since this metric describes only the instantaneous maximum noise value, it provides no information on the duration of noise exposure.
SEL (sound exposure level): The SEL metric represents the sound energy detected above a threshold, which is 10 decibels below the peak noise level, for a noise event as a factor of both intensity and duration of that noise event. The SEL represents the cumulative acoustical energy of the event but as though it had occurred within one second. Thus, for example, two events with the same intensity but different durations can be differentiated with the longer duration event having a higher SEL. In general, an aircraft SEL level is approximately 8-10 dB higher than the Lmax, or peak, noise level.
(Return to Table of Contents)
Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report Page 26 of 53 Fourth Quarter 2025
APPENDICES
Runway 28R/L Jet Departure List for Calendar Quarter
Date/Time Flight Tail Aircraft Beacon Runway Aircraft Category Comments Excused Number Number Type Code 10/9/2024 6:27 GL5T 3604 28L B ATC Instructions No
11/24/2024 20:25 EJA256 N256QS CL60 3374 28R B ATC Instructions No 10/6/2024 12:02 F900 3213 28R B ATC Instructions No
11/26/2024 11:05 EJA819 N819QS C700 4212 28L B ATC Instructions No ATC Instructions 4
11/16/202414 :41 FTH99 N99LM C25B 3613 28R B Audio Not Available No 11/16/202414 :01 F900 3773 28R B Audio Not Available No 11/15/2024 14:02 N509RP N509RP C550 4250 28R B Audio Not Available No 11/17/2024 19:16 GLF5 6374 28L B Audio Not Available No 11/18/2024 0:28 BBQ9705 N625SW B733 3334 28L J Audio Not Available No 11/14/2024 8:24 GLF5 3663 28R B Audio Not Available No
11/14/2024 9:54 GA6C 4275 28R B Audio Not Ava11able No
11/15/2024 9:23 GA6C 3742 28R B - Audio Not Available No 11/14/2024 19:00 N889CM N889CM EA50 4235 28L B Audio Not Available No Audio Not Available 9
10/21/2024 10:00 VJA310 N310JE CL35 6304 28L B Departure Timing No 10/15/2024 8:07 F900 3673 28L B Departure Timing No
10/14/2024 10:46 LXJ422 N422FX E545 3760 28L B Departure Timing No 10/13/2024 17:41 LJ60 4207 28R B Departure Timing No
10/12/2024 10:04 LXJ598 N598FX CL35 3712 28R B Departure Timing No 10/2/2024 9:59 GLF4 6305 28L B Departure Timing No
10/3/2024 18:01 PXT55 N525B C25B 3336 28R B Departure Timing No 12/30/2024 23:37 N831DX N831DX SF50 4565 28R B Departure Timing No 12/28/2024 12:00 C25C 3236 28R B Departure Timing No
12/26/2024 12:02 PXT680 N680PC C680 3256 28L B Departure Timing No 12/20/2024 12: 12 LXJ417 N417FX E545 4241 28L B Departure Timing No 12/14/2024 15:05 S1S522 N522AD CL35 3277 28R B Departure Timing No Departure Timing 12
10/10/2024 15:04 N887CD N887CD SF50 4523 28L B Fleet Week Yes 10/11/2024 13:51 F900 2230 28L B Fleet Week Yes
10/10/2024 14:58 N515LT N515LT CL60 3671 28L B Fleet Week Yes 10/13/2024 15:22 PXT578 N578CJ C25B 4553 28R B Fleet Week Yes 10/11/202414:11 PXT504 N504FM C25A 2231 28R B Fleet Week Yes 10/11/2024 14:54 C25B 4555 28R B Fleet Week Yes
10/12/2024 14:21 CL30 3360 28R B Fleet Week Yes
10/13/2024 14:10 GLF4 1741 28L B Fleet Week Yes
Fleet Week 8
10/3/2024 9:29 N862LG N862LG E55P 1702 28L B Lifeguard Medical Yes 10/3/2024 11 :39 JLG806 N806GJ H25B 3706 28L B Lifeguard Medical Yes 10/3/2024 14:38 LN54DD N54DD C560 4521 28L B Lifeguard Medical Yes 10/3/2024 20:23 LN54DD N54DD C560 3644 28L B Lifeguard Medical Yes 10/4/2024 1: 55 LN54DD N54DD C560 3306 28R B Lifeguard Medical Yes 10/4/2024 6:52 LN810BE N810BE C560 3201 28R B Lifeguard Medical Yes 10/6/2024 7:22 LN864AM N864AM H25B 3612 28R B Lifeguard Medical Yes 10/7/202414:13 LN54DD N54DD C560 4262 28R B Lifeguard Medical Yes 10/7/2024 22:19 LN54DD N54DD C560 3324 28R B Lifeguard Medical Yes Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report Page 27 of 53 Fourth Quarter 2025 Date/Time Flight Tail Aircraft Beacon Runway Aircraft Category Comments Excused Number Number Type Code 10/8/2024 17:49 Medevac GALX 4263 28L B Lifeguard Medical Yes 10/8/2024 1 8:08 Medevac C560 3230 28R B Lifeguard Medical Yes 10/9/2024 3:09 Medevac C560 4202 28R B Lifeguard Medical Yes 10/9/2024 12:31 Medevac FApO 3342 28L B Lifeguard Medical Yes 10/9/2024 19:07 LN131RR LN131RR C560 4574 28R B Lifeguard Medical Yes 10/9/2024 22:43 LNSCM36 LN360SN LJ60 4242 28R B Lifeguard Medical Yes 10/10/2024 4:29 LN131RR LN131RR C560 4203 28R B Lifeguard Medical Yes 10/14/2024 12:38 JLG806 N806GJ H25B 1744 28L B Lifeguard Medical Yes 10/15/2024 8:58 Medevac ASTR 3676 28R B Lifeguard Medical Yes 10/16/2024 13:07 LN968SR N968SR C560 4540 28L B Lifeguard Medical Yes 10/16/2024 20:32 LN968SR N968SR C560 3301 28L B Lifeguard Medical Yes 10/17/2024 10:38 LN116AA N116AA C25B 3633 28R B Lifeguard Medical Yes 10/17/2024 10:54 LN149WW N149WW · C25B 3655 28R B Lifeguard Medical Yes 10/17/2024 12:42 LN968SR N968SR C560 4541 28L B Lifeguard Medical Yes 10/17/2024 19:28 LN968SR N968SR C560 3765 28L B Lifeguard Medical Yes 10/19/2024 7:34 LN51GJ N51GJ LJ35 3366 28L B Lifeguard Medical Yes 10/20/2024 13:25 LN681HC N681HC CLSO 3611 28L .B Lifeguard Medical Yes 10/22/2024 2: 13 LN116AA N116AA C25B 3256 28L B Lifeguard Medical Yes 10/22/2024 2:48 LN287LS LN287LS BE40 3275 28R B Lifeguard Medical Yes 10/22/2024 12:52 LN518KH N518KH G150 1732 28L B Lifeguard Medical Yes 10/22/2024 16:27 LN90J N90J LJ35 1744 28L B Lifeguard Medical Yes 10/22/2024 20: 13 LN509RP N509RP C550 4217 28R B Lifeguard Medical Yes 10/25/2024 15:30 LN131RR N131RR C560 4233 28L B Lifeguard Medical Yes 10/25/2024 22:41 LN131RR N131RR C560 4543 28R B Lifeguard Medical Yes 10/25/2024 23:53 LN904LR N904LR C560 3236 28R B Lifeguard Medical Yes 10/26/2024 18:23 LNXAKID • LNXAKID LJ35 3647 28R B Lifeguard Medical Yes 10/27/2024 20:15 LN910DF LN910DF C650 1724 28L B Lifeguard Medical Yes 10/29/2024 13:08 Medevac GALX 4242 28L B Lifeguard Medical ,Yes 10/30/2024 1 :37 LN810BE N810BE C560 3240 28L B Lifeguard Medical Yes 10/30/2024 21 :00 GLEX 3373 28L B Lifeguard Medical Yes 11/8/2024 3:37 LN131RR LN131RR C560 4245 28R B Lifeguard Medical Yes 11/9/2024 11 :31 LN131RR N131RR C560 4203 28L- B Lifeguard Medical Yes 11/9/2024 18:08 LN131RR N131RR C560 4211 28R B Lifeguard Medical Yes 11/10/2024 10:36 LN131RR LN131RR C560 4201 28R. B Lifeguard Medical Yes 11/10/2024 17:37 LN131RR N131RR C560 4234 28R B Lifeguard Medical Yes 11/13/202417:35 LN81GJ N81GJ LJ35 3335 28L B Lifeguard Medical Yes 11/15/2024 6:26 LN149WW N149WW C25B 1712 28R B Lifeguard Medlcal Yes 11/18/2024 15:11 LN968SR N968SR C560 4517 28R B Lifeguard Medical Yes 11/19/2024 0:07 LN968SR N968SR C560 3231 28R B Lifeguard Medical Yes 11/23/2024 11:47 CGBSW CGBSW ASTR 1752 28L B Lifeguard Medical Yes 11/24/2024 10:12 LN54DD N54DD C560 4564 28L B Lifeguard Medical Yes 1·1,24/2024 16:21 LN54DD N54DD C560 3277 28L B Lifeguard Medical Yes 11/26/2024 2:24 CGBSW CGBSW ASTR 3316 28L B Lifeguard Medical Yes 11/26/2024 11 :54 Medevac Medevac LJ35 3377 28L B Lifeguard Medical Yes 11/26/2024 17:45 C560 4254 28R B Lifeguard Medical Yes
12/1/202410:12 LN968SR N968SR C560 4216 28R B Lifeguard Medical Yes 12/1/2024 13:38 JLG806 N806GJ H25B 3611 28L B Lifeguard Medical Yes 12/2/2024 18:12 LN289RT N289RT C25A 4232 28R B Lifeguard Medical Yes 12/3/2024 12:11 Medevac Medevac G150 4237 28R B Lifeguard Medical Yes 12/3/2024 19:22 Medevac Medevac G150 4245 28R B Lifeguard Medical Yes 12/4/2024 13:21 Medevac Medevac C560 4257 28R B Lifeguard Medie,11 Yes Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report Page 28 of 53 • Fourth· Quarter 2025 Date/Time Flight Tail Aircraft Beacon Runway Aircraft Category Comments Excused Number Number Type Code 12/5/2024 1:53 LN810BE N810BE C560 3237 28R B Lifeguard Medical Yes 12/5/2024 3 57 LN51GJ LN51GJ LJ35 3357 28L B Lifeguard Medical Yes 12/9/202418 31 Medevac Medevac GALX 4531 28L B Lifeguard Medical Yes 12/10/2024 4:27 LN54DD N54DD C560 3316 28R B Lifeguard Medical Yes 12/14/2024 18 54 LN810BE N810BE C560 3206 28R B Lifeguard Medical Yes 12/18/2024 20:10 Medevac Medevac C550 4221 28R B Lifeguard Medical Yes 12/19/2024 5:07 Medevac Medevac C550 ·4243 28R B Lifeguard Medical Yes 12/19/2024 11:48 LN509RP LN509RP C550 4557 28R B Lifeguard Medical Yes 12/19/2024 18:06 LN509RP N509RP C550 4220 28R B Lifeguard Medical Yes 12/19/2024 18:13 LN680AG N680AG C680 1774 28R B Lifeguard Medical Yes 12/22/2024 14:20 Medevac Medevac GALX 4566 28R B Lifeguard Medical Yes 12/22/2024 16:13 LN54DD N54DD C560 4507 28L B Lifeguard Medical Yes 12/22/2024 22:14 Medevac Medevac C550 4250 28R B Lifeguard Medical Yes 12/22/2024 22:24 LN54DD N54DD C560 3250 28L B Lifeguard Medical Yes 12/23/2024 8 06 Medevac Medevac C550 4243 28R B Lifeguard Medical Yes 12/23/2024 17:29 LN810BE N810BE C560 3235 28R B Lifeguard Medical Yes 12/24/2024 12:43 Medevac Medevac C550 4261 28R B Lifeguard Medical Yes 12/24/2024 18:54 Medevac Medevac C550 4244 28R B Lifeguard Medical Yes 12/27/2024 9:45 LN54DD N54DD C560 4216 28R B Lifeguard Medical Yes 12/27/2024 16:38 LN54DD N54DD C560 3666 28R B Lifeguard Medical Yes 12/28/2024 11 :02 LN810BE N810BE C560 4572 28R B Lifeguard Medical Yes 12/28/2024 18:54 LN810BE N810BE C560 3217 28R B Lifeguard Medical Yes Lifeguard Medical 82
12/20/2024 15:30 N300DG N300DG SF50 4505 28L B Pilot Requested No 12/20/2024 17:26 N175EM N175EM E50P 1727 28L B Pilot Requested No 12/20/2024 21:33 MXY6308 N126BZ E190 3306 28L R Pilot Requested No 12/23/2024 12:08 N300DG N300DG SF50 4504 28L B Pilot Requested No /
12/24/2024 12:41 C750 3716 28L B Pilot Requested No
12/26/2024 12:28 N850RT GLF4 3205 28L B Pilot Requested No 12/27/2024 12:25 PXT656 N656SM C25B 3301 28R B Pilot Requested No 12/27/2024 13:38 CTL35 N719CA LJ35 2207 28R B Pilot Requested No 12/28/2024 13:28 TFF988 N488VC CL35 6356 28L B Pilot Requested No 12/28/2024 14:39 EJA586 N586QS C68A 6303 28R B Pilot Requested No 12/30/2024 10:16 TIV685 N685VM C680 3637 28L B Pilot Requested No 12/30/2024 19:16 C25A 6375 28R B Pilot Requested No
11/8/2024 14:54 LXJ366 N366FX E55P 6370 28R B Pilot Requested No 11/8/2024 17:03 ASP511 CFIAS C25A 3615 28R B Pilot Requested No 11/10/2024 13:26 VNT495 N495DD CL60 6355 28R B Pilot Requested No 11/10/2024 15:44 GLF5 1741 28L B Pilot Requested No
11/10/2024 16:12 GLF5 6305 28R B Pilot Requested No
11/13/2024 17:09 EJA933 N933QS C68A 3326 28R B Pilot Requested No 11/18/2024 13:47 N729HB L39 3710 28R J Pilot Requested No 11/18/2024 15:29 N798T N798T C56X 3334 28R B Pilot Requested No 11/18/2024 17:03 EJA541 N541QS C68A 3645 28R B Pilot Requested No 11/18/2024 18:35 KFS12 N229CK FA20 1711 28R B Pilot Requested No 11/19/2024 6:18 GDG626 N626NT F2TH 3355 28L B Pilot Requested No 11/19/2024 15:00 H25B 1765 28R B Pilot Requested No
11/23/2024 14:44 N729HB N729HB L39 340 28R J Pilot Requested No 11/23/2024 21:16 VJT981 9HVJZ GLEX 3345 28L B Pilot Requested No 11/24/2024 11 :57 GLF5 3703 28L B Pilot Requested No
11/24/2024 12:11 N862LG N862LG E55P 1725 28L B Pilot Requested No Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report Page 29 of 53 Fourth Quarter 2025 Date/Time Flight Tail Aircraft Beacon Runway Aircraft Category Comments Excused Number Number Type Code 11/24/2024 22:05 N525JN N525JN C25A 4531 28R B Pilot Requested No 11/25/2024 20:05 TIV85 N85VM C25B 3370 28R B Pilot Requested No 11/26/2024 13:16 FTH444 N444AM C25B 3360 28R B Pilot Requested No 11/26/2024 14:23 C56X 4540 28L B Pilot Requested No
11/26/2024 16:50 N24AH N24AH SF50 3204 28L B Pilot Requested No 11/27/2024 12:55 N636DK N636DK E55P 4264 28R B Pilot Requested No 11/27/2024 15:41 N729HB L39 5364 28L J Pilot Requested No 11/29/2024 10:36 N729HB L39 6342 28R J Pilot Requested No 11/29/2024 12:22 PXT525 N525B C25B 3604 28R B Pilot Requested No 11/29/2024 12:59 N806SQ N806SQ C650 3624 28L B Pilot Requested No 11/29/2024 13:36 GALX 4267 28R B Pilot Requested No
12/1/2024 14:43 N175EM N175EM E50P 4557 28R B Pilot Requested No 12/1/2024 16:20 GAGG 3605 28L B Pilot Requested No
12/2/202410:07 GA6C 4512 28R B Pilot Requested No
12/2/2024 15: 09 F2TH 3636 28L B Pilot Requested No
12/2/202415:31 C56X 1764 28R B Pilot Requested No
12/3/2024 12:42 JRE832 N832JS C56X 3340 28R B Pilot Requested No 12/3/2024 13:40 N300MG N300MG E55P 3306 28R B Pilot Requested No 12/3/2024 14:15 PXT415 N415PC C25B 1725 28R B Pilot Requested No 12/3/2024 16:19 GLF5 3652 28L B Pilot Requested No
12/3/202418:19 N888DH N888DH CL60 1755 28L B Pilot Requested No 12/5/2024 12:58 CL35 6365 28L B Pilot Requested No
12/5/2024 14:38 GALX 4557 28L B Pilot Requested No
12/6/2024 9:01 GLF5 3633 28L B Pilot Requested No
12/6/2024 22:39 N551SJ N551SJ C551 3362 28L B Pilot Requested No 12/8/2024 12:14 KOW910 N910E C750 3334 28L B Pilot Requested No 12/8/2024 13:23 XLJ784 N784CC LJ45 3606 28R B Pilot Requested No 12/10/2024 16:03 N504YH N504YH HDJT 4234 28L B Pilot Requested No 12/11/2024 9:19 LXJ372 N372FX E55P , 4521 28R B Pilot Requested No 12/11/2024 9:28 F900 3272 28R B Pilot Requested No
12/11/2024 16:51 N559WJ N559WJ C550 4501 28R B Pilot Requested No 12/12/2024 10:27 XBJST XBJST C650 1773 28R B Pilot Requested No 12/12/2024 10:41 F2TH 3242 28L B Pilot Requested No
12/12/2024 14:02 N504YH HDJT 4277 28L B Pilot Requested No 12/14/2024 11 :31 G280 3337 28L B Pilot Requested No
12/14/2024 13:53 N504YH A64AFA HDJT 4211 28L B Pilot Requested No 12/14/2024 14:32 EJA913 N913QS C68A 1755 28L B Pilot Requested No 12/15/2024 11:40 N504YH N504YH HDJT 4527 28L B Pilot Requested No 12/15/2024 16:04 EJA914 N914QS C68A 4230 28R B Pilot Requested No 12/16/2024 17:08 GLF5 3215 28L B Pilot Requested No
12/16/2024 17:33 F2TH 4543 28L B Pilot Requested No
12/17/2024 14:01 RKJ948 N948TX C750 4533 28R B Pilot Requested No 12/17/2024 14:04 JTL555 N555TF GLF4 1725 28L B Pilot Requested No 12/18/2024 16:06 N240BR N240BR C240 3632 28R G Pilot Requested No 12/19/2024 7:43 SCW3801 N916SW CRJ2 3234 28R R Pilot Requested No 12/20/2024 12:02 GLF5 3637 28L B Pilot Requested No
12/20/2024 13:27 JRE827 N827JS C56X 3266 28R B Pilot Requested No 12/20/2024 13:44 N504YH N504YH HDJT 6345 28L B Pilot Requested No 10/4/2024 12: 16 C501 2225 28R B Pilot Requested No
10/4/2024 13:00 GA6C 4222 28L B Pilot Requested No
10/4/2024 15:54 FA7X 3626 28L B Pilot Requested No
Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report Page 30 of 53 Fourth Quarter 2025 Date/Time Flight Tail Aircraft Beacon Runway Aircraft Category Comments Excused Number Number Type Code 10/5/2024 11:52 N862LG N862LG E55P 1735 28L B Pilot Requested No 10/5/2024 15: 16 FA7X 3222 28R B Pilot Requested No
10/6/2024 10: 17 FA7X 3754 28L B Pilot Requested No
10/7/2024 12:46 N22PB N22PB PC24 3232 28L B Pilot Requested No 10/7/2024 16:27 F2TH 3731 28L B Pilot Requested No
10/9/2024 10:17 VNT71 N71HC C56X 3312 28R B Pilot Requested No 10/10/2024 9: 55 N524HP N524HP SF50 3201 28R B Pilot Requested No 10/12/2024 15:26 N444RL N444RL EA50 3720 28R B Pilot Requested No 10/13/2024 9:26 N815RM N815RM HDJT 3273 28R B Pilot Requested No 10/13/2024 10:29 GLF5 3240 28L B Pilot Requested No
10/14/2024 8:36 PPJJA PPJJA E550 3236 28R B Pilot Requested No 10/ 14/2024 11 :00 JRE799 N799JS C25B 1774 28L B Pilot Requested No 10/15/2024 8:09 EJA523 N523QS C68A 4264 28R B Pilot Requested No 10/16/2024 8:09 RKJ232 N232CF C750 4201 28R B Pilot Requested No 10/17/2024 6:24 N815RM N815RM HDJT 3237 28R B Pilot Requested No 10/17/2024 12:49 N51GJ N51GJ LJ35 3244 28L B Pilot Requested No 10/19/2024 7:47 LXJ657 N657FX GLF6 3323 28L B Pilot Requested No 10/19/2024 18:24 N501JG N501JG C560 4214 28L B Pilot Requested No 10/20/2024 17:50 N401FT N401FT GLF4 1775 28L B Pilot Requested No 10/21/2024 8:57 N123ED N123ED H25B 3370 28L B Pilot Requested No 10/22/2024 9:33 F2TH 4227 28L B Pilot Requested No
10/22/2024 14:07 XBJST XBJST C650 1762 28R B Pilot Requested No 10/22/2024 15:34 RKJ232 N232CF C750 3763 28L B Pilot Requested No 10/22/2024 21 :06 JNX01 N331XA C25B 3223 28R B Pilot Requested No 10/23/2024 8:06 F2TH 3675 28L B Pilot Requested No
10/24/2024 7:47 GLF5 4553 28R B Pilot Requested No
10/24/2024 8:23 HER348 N348CF C750 4563 28R B Pilot Requested No 10/24/2024 13:06 GLF5 3611 28L B Pilot Requested No
10/24/2024 16:09 EJA827 N827QS C700 4530 28L B Pilot Requested No 10/25/2024 9:05 RKJ232 N232CF C750 3241 28L B Pilot Requested No 10/25/2024 13:21 KOW818 N818CF C750 6363 28L B Pilot Requested No 10/26/2024 21 :21 KOW818 N818CF C750 4226 28R B Pilot Requested No 10/26/2024 23:11 EJA902 N902QS C68A 4215 28R B Pilot Requested No 10/27/2024 14:29 N578JG N578JG CL60 3715 28R B Pilot Requested No 10/28/2024 9:39 PRE20 N20BL GALX 3777 28L B Pilot Requested No 10/28/2024 10:33 EJM505 N577JM E55P 6317 28R B Pilot Requested No 10/28/2024 16:50 EJA842 N842QS C700 1722 28L B Pilot Requested No 10/29/2024 9:44 CL60 3710 28L B Pilot Requested No
10/29/2024 14:38 RKJ750 N750GM C750 4241 28R B Pilot Requested No 10/29/2024 15:19 LXJ539 N539FX CL35 1737 28R B Pilot Requested No 10/29/2024 15:23 EJA605 N605QS C68A 6376 28R B Pilot Requested No 10/29/2024 15:36 F900 3363 28R B Pilot Requested No
10/29/2024 19:14 GA6C 4262 28L B Pilot Requested No
10/29/2024 19: 52 F2TH 3313 28R B Pilot Requested No
10/30/2024 9:31 EJA782 N782QS CL35 3203 28L B Pilot Requested No 10/30/2024 9:37 VJT592 9HVFL CL60 1743 28L B Pilot Requested No 10/30/2024 9:54 WUP918 N918TX C750 3375 28L B Pilot Requested No 10/30/2024 14:07 LXJ449 N449FX E545 3620 28L B Pilot Requested No 10/30/2024 16:46 EJM505 N577JM E55P 3364 28L B Pilot Requested No 10/31/2024 7:23 GLF5 1734 28L B Pilot Requested No
10/31/2024 10:02 C25A 3753 28L B Pilot Requested No
Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report Page 31 of 53 Fourth Quarter 2025 Date/Time Flight Tail Aircraft Beacon Runway Aircraft Category Comments Excused Number Number Type Code 10/31/2024 19:35 GLFS 3231 28L B Pilot Requested No
11/2/2024 13:30 C56X 1712 28L B Pilot Requested No
11/3/2024 11 :48 GLF5 1745 28L E\ Pilot Requested No
11/3/2024 14:06 EJA707 N707QS CL35 3616 28L B Pilot Requested No 11/3/202417:39 FA7X 3650 28L B Pilot Requested No
11/4/202411 :16 C56X 3633 28R B Pilot Requested No
11/5/2024 16:41 E550 3274 28L B Pilot Requested No
11/7/2024 8:16 GLF5 1703 28L B Pilot Requested No
11/7/2024 16:25 GLF5 3637 28L B Pilot Requested No
11/7/2024 20:31 FASO 4512 28L B Pilot Requested No
Pilot Requested 140
10/6/2024 22:49 SWA5680 N909WN B737 3260 28L J RWY 30 Routine Closure Yes 10/7/2024 5:17 SWA261 N1809U B38M 3302 28L J RWY 30 Routine Closure Yes 10/7/2024 5:23 SWA427 N8738K B38M 3303 28L J RWY 30 Routine Closure Yes 10/7/2024 5:35 NKS278 N976NK A20N 3204 28L J RWY 30 Routine Closure Yes 10/14/2024 1:54 SWA2988 N230WN B737 3357 28L J RWY 30 Routine Closure Yes 10/21/2024 4:57 GLFS 3374 28L B RWY 30 Routine Closure Yes 12/16/2024 5:35 NKS278 N992NK A20N 3315 28L J RWY 30 Routine Closure Yes 12/16/2024 5:36 SWA329 N8797Q B38M 3277 28L J RWY 30 Routine Closure Yes RWY 30 Routine 8 Closure
10/14/2024 16:46 SIS61 N615KJ C25B 3212 28L B Safety/Emergency Yes 10/27/2024 10:17 GASC 4264 28L B Safety/Emergency Yes
11/9/2024 11:19 VNT495 N495DD CL60 3664 28R B Safety/Emergency Yes 11/10/2024 13:21 E190 3773 28R R Safety/Emergency Yes
12/6/2024 9: 18 GLF6 3765 28L B Safety/Emergency Yes
Safety/Emergency 5
Grand Count 268
(Return to Table of Contents)
Runway 10R/L Jet Aircraft Landing List for Calendar Quarter Date/Time Flight Tail . Aircraft Beacon Runway Aircraft Category Comments Excused Number Number Type Code 11/13/2024 11 :05 LXJ554 N554FX CL30 1005 10L B ATC Instructions No ATC Instructions 1
11/21/2024 16:38 LXJ483 N483FX GLF4 2066 10R B ATC Request No 11/21/2024 9:05 N344QS N344QS E55P 3250 10R B ATC Request No 11/21/2024 10:25 EJA511 N511QS C68A 4573 10R B ATC Request No 11/21/202416 :34 N525JN N525JN C25A 4262 10R B ATC Request No 11/21/2024 17:54 N288G N288G C525 2003 10R B ATC Request No ATC Request 5
11/20/2024 17:40 JSX656 N262JX E135 1343 10R R Air Traffic Conflict Yes Air Traffic Conflict 1
11/22/2024 10:04 SKW3478 N413SY E75L 7766 10R R Excused by reprocessing Yes Excused by 1 reorocessina
Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report Page 32 of 53 Fourth Quarter 2025 Date/Time Flight Tail Aircraft Beacon Runway Aircraft Category Comments Excused Number Number Type Code 11/13/2024 15:46 LN81GJ N81GJ LJ35 2660 10R B Lifeguard Medical Yes 12/13/2024 20:41 LN149WW N149WW C25B 3573 10R B Lifeguard Medical Yes 11/21/2024 1 :15 LN968SR N968SR C560 4213 10L B Lifeguard Medical Yes Lifeguard Medical 3
12/13/2024 12:17 C25M 3736 10R B Pilot Requested No
12/13/2024 12:51 EJA125 N125QS GL5T 1017 10R B Pilot Requested No 12/13/2024 11 :05 N756TG N756TG CL30 4151 10R B Pilot Requested No 12/13/2024 10:11 N914LD N914LD F2TH 2427 10R B Pilot Requested No 11/30/2024 9:22 PXT525 N525B C25B 7264 10L B Pilot Requested No 11/30/2024 8:55 EJA417 N417QS E55P 1643 10R B Pilot Requested No 11/22/2024 9:05 N500XX N500XX GA5C 4561 10R B Pilot Requested No 11/21/2024 22:14 PXT150 N150TG C680 7650 10R B Pilot Requested No 11/21/2024 21 :58 GLF5 7437 10R B Pilot Requested No
11/21/2024 21 :05 PXT525 N525B C25B 3035 10R B Pilot Requested No 11/21/2024 16:52 EJA642 N642QS C56X 1534 10R B Pilot Requested No 11/21/2024 12:14 N604BS N604BS CL60 6030 10R B Pilot Requested No 11/21/2024 11 :45 GLF5 4246 10L B Pilot Requested No
11/20/2024 20:09 CL30 3502 10R B Pilot Requested No
11/20/2024 10:36 N149HC N149HC C550 2074 10R B Pilot Requested No 11/13/2024 15:42 GLF5 6064 10R B Pilot Requested No
11/13/202415 :11 LJ45 1531 10R B Pilot Requested No
11/13/202415:08 CY0602 N600SJ LJ60 3062 10R B Pilot Requested No 11/13/2024 14:20 PXT96 N96PX C25B 6737 10R B Pilot Requested No 12/13/2024 19: 11 EJA598 N59BQS C6BA 2577 10R B Pilot Requested No 12/13/2024 18:47 FA7X 1317 10R B Pilot Requested No
12/13/2024 17:04 ASP8 14 CFSBR E545 7005 10R B Pilot Requested No 12/13/2024 15:38 GLF6 3205 10R B Pilot Requested No
Pilot Requested 23
12/13/2024 14:17 EJA504 N504QS C68A 4536 10R B Southeast Plan Constraints Yes 12/13/2024 14:04 N732SC N732SC LJ31 4043 10R B Southeast Plan Constraints Yes 12/13/2024 14:50 LXJ514 N514FX CL35 4264 10R B Southeast Plan Constraints Yes 12/21/2024 8:24 N67CC N67CC C25A 7310 10R B Southeast Plan Constraints Yes 12/21/2024 9:11 GLF4 2266 10R B Southeast Plan Constraints Yes 12/26/2024 15:10 PXT150 N150TG C680 4247 10R B Southeast Plan Constraints Yes 12/13/2024 14:55 KOW992 N992MG C750 3761 10R B Southeast Plan Constraints Yes 12/13/2024 14:13 STT68 N268PJ PC24 1526 10R B Southeast Plan Constraints Yes 12/13/2024 14:10 EJA777 N777QS CL35 4565 10R B Southeast Plan Constraints Yes 12/13/2024 16:01 N504YH A64AFA HDJT 1 4624 10R B Southeast Plan Constraints Yes 12/13/2024 15:54 EJA622 N622QS C68A 4512 10R B Southeast Plan Constraints Yes Southeast Plan 11 Constraints
Grand Count 45
(Return to Table of Contents)
Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report Page 33 of 53 Fourth Quarter 2025 North Field VFR Departure List for Calendar Quarter
Date/Time Runway Flight Tail Aircraft Beacon Code Comments Excused Number Number Type 11/16/202416:18 28R N405D8 N405D8 T206 5302 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 11/16/2024 16:22 28L N632PM N632PM PA46 5341 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 11/17/20241351 28R N315L N315L M20P 324 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 11/17/2024 13:58 PAD1 CMOS N838CS EC35 5342 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 11/23/2024 12:56 28R LNC4 5370 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 11/29/2024 11 :44 28R N553TP N553TP P28A 4547 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 11/29/202411:53 28R N109LD N109LD P28A 4571 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 11/29/2024 12:24 33 N728GD N728GD RVS 5351 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 11/29/2024 12:56 33 N619MC N619MC S22T 5326 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 11/30/2024 17:17 PAD1 CMD0B N838CS EC35 5367 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 11/30/2024 17:27 28R N257CD N257CD SR20 3215 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 12/1/2024 12:48 28R N109LD N109LD P28A 5360 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 12/2/2024 11: 13 33 N84DL N84DL C172 4510 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 12/2/2024 12:03 28R TOG132 BE20 4576 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 12/2/2024 14:31 33 N22QT N22QT DA40 4230 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 12/3/2024 14 41 28R NGF6325 N8255E BE33 3244 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 12/5/2024 20:00 28R N363K N363K C172 5363 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 12/7/2024 13:54 33 N619MC N619MC S22T 5345 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 12/8/2024 11 :04 33 N109LD N109LD P28A 315 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 12/10/2024 16:30 28R BYF17 N236SP C172 343 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 12/10/2024 17:02 28R N2TL N2TL BE95 5322 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 12/10/2024 18:23 28R N5276P N5276P C172 316 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 12/10/2024 18:30 33 XSN90 N905LB PC12 315 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 12/15/2024 11 :22 33 N44PF N44PF P28A 5331 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 12/15/2024 11 :54 PAD1 CMD0S N838CS EC35 5307 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 12/15/2024 16:15 28R N2669N N2669N C340 5347 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 12/18/2024 14:33 28R N759HJ N759HJ C182 4552 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 12/18/2024 16:05 28R N442EG N442EG S22T 4555 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 12/18/2024 16:06 28R N240BR N240BR C240 3632 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 12/19/2024 12:20 33 FFLB00 LNC4 5347 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 12/20/2024 16:38 28R N61AP N61AP BE20 5372 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 12/20/2024 17:22 28R N1868H N1868H P28A 4543 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 12/30/2024 14:35 28R N759HJ N759HJ C182 334 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 12/30/2024 14:55 33 N4910A N4910A C180 372 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 12/31/2024 10:38 PAD1 CMD0S N838CS EC35 5316 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 12/31/2024 12:29 28R N345UW N345UW RVS 3201 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 10/1/2024 10:09 33 N28641 N28641 AAS 4514 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 10/2/2024 7:14 28L BXR1960 N106VE C208 342 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 10/2/2024 10: 12 28L N2195M N2195M P28B 377 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 10/4/2024 9:54 33 N734BN N734BN C172 4535 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 10/4/2024 11 :22 33 N21866 N21866 P28A 4221 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 10/4/2024 12:07 28L N1530W N1530W BE35 4275 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 10/4/2024 14:12 33 N375M N375M RV? 354 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 10/4/2024 17:40 28R N888UM N888UM S22T 3201 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 10/6/2024 11 :23 33 N301 EF N301EF VELO 4542 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 10/6/2024 12:25 33 N153HP N153HP GAS 4501 Air Traffic Conflict Yes Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report Page 34 of 53 Fourth Quarter 2025 Datemme Runway Flight Tail Aircraft Beacon Code Comments Excused Number Number Type 10/6/2024 14:13 2BR N739UL N739UL C172 4547 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 10/6/2024 14:40 2BR N473SA N473SA BE36 3764 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 10/6/2024 20:13 33 N22QT N22QT DA40 5347 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 10/9/2024 15:46 33 N68459 N68459 C152 5354 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 10/9/2024 16:42 2BL N59146 N59146 C206 4227 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 10/9/2024 19:38 PAD1 CMDB NB38CS EC35 5330 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 10/10/2024 14:16 28R N250BS N2508S T210 4240 Air Traffic Conflict Yes , 10/13/2024 17:59 33 N312JL N312JL HXB 4534 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 10/18/2024 13:16 33 N20506 N20506 M20T 4251 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 10/18/2024 13:38 33 N727NG N727NG BE33 3335 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 10/18/2024 14:30 33 N312LL N312LL T18 4214 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 10/18/2024 15:04 33 N6605D N6605D C172 4562 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 10/18/2024 20:57 28R N405DB N405DB T206 1732 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 10/19/2024 15:42 28R N405DB N405DB. T206 3634 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 10/20/2024 13:28 28R NBB7DC N887DC B350 5353 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 10/20/2024 14:00 33 N33377 N33377 P28A 4213 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 10/20/2024 15:20 PAD1 REH18 N312RX EC35 4521 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 10/20/2024 16:52 28R N2117D N2117D BE35 3333 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 10/20/2024 17:02 PAD1 CMD8 N838CS EC35 321 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 10/20/2024 17:55 33 N296ME N296ME C172 5351 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 10/21/2024 11:41 33 N3959L N3959L C172 5340 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 10/21/2024 13:12 33 PA46 3203 Air Traffic Conflict Yes
10/21/2024 17:33 33 N3959L N3959L C172 4541 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 10/21/2024 17:51 2BR N68459 N68459 C172 5315 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 10/23/2024 11 :46 , 28L N6242F N6242F C172 5332 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 10/23/2024 16:46 28R N903PJ N903PJ PC12 4270 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 10/24/2024 12:08 28R N24498 N24498 C152 4217 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 10/26/2024 14:34 28R N42BG N42BG P46T 4234 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 10/28/2024 13:58 33 PA46 4506 Air Traffic Conflict Yes
10/29/2024 7:49 2BL BXR8604 N9623B C208 4505 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 10/29/2024 11 :23 33 N6605D N6605D C172 5354 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 10/30/202415:17 33 N12RT N12RT LNGD 4553 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 11/1/2024 12:24 PAD1 ARG2 H500 5376 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 11/1/2024 13:05 33 NB312H N8312H P28A 4560 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 11/1/2024 13:06 28L N5138V N5138V C172 3261 Air Traffic Cor,flict Yes 11/1/2024 18:00 28R N210NL N210NL P210 4505 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 11/2/2024 15:37 28R N727VT N727VT C182 5314 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 11/5/2024 10:27 28R' XSN82 N82NG PC12 4260 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 11/5/2024 14:02 33 N93214 N93214 C152 5315 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 11/5/2024 14:21 28L N444FC N444FC BT36 4566 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 11/5/2024 17:46 28R N24498 N24498 C152 5332 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 11/7/2024 8:42 28R PA46 1707 Air Traffic Conflict Yes
1.1/8/2024 11:22 33 N109LD N109LD P28A 4557 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 11/8/2024 11 :48 33 N4826T N4826T P28A 4233 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 11/8/2024 12:57 33 N20506 N20506 M20T 4554 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 11/8/202417:15 33 N7914G N7914G C172 5372 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 11/8/2024 17:30 PAD1 CMD8 N838CS EC35 327 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 11/10/2024 11 :28 28R N8085W N8085W P28A 5316 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 11/14/202415:03 28R N6JS N6JS S22T 6317 Air Traffic Conflict Yes Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report Page 35 of 53 Fourth Quarter 2025 Date/Time Runway Flight Tail Aircraft Beacon Code Comments Excused Number Number Type 11/14/202416:32 28R N21866 N21866 P28A 371 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 11/15/20241:14 PAD1 CMD8 N838CS EC35 372 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 11/15/2024 10 54 28R N109LD N109LD P28A 4556 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 11/15/2024 15: 12 33 N512HW N512HW S22T 363 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 11/16/2024 12:31 28L N21866 N21866 P28A 4220 Air Traffic Conflict Yes Air Traffic Conflict 100
10/15/2024 19:57 28R N91338 N91338 P28A 325 Excused by reprocessing Yes 10/22/2024 13:00 33 N20506 N20506 M20T 4542 Excused by reprocessing Yes 11/15/2024 12:40 28R PC12 3722 Excused by reprocessing Yes 11/19/20241412 28R N368BW N368BW BE60 353 Excused by reprocessing Yes 11/29/2024 10: 00 28R N3CK N3CK S22T 5351 Excused by reprocessing Yes 12/6/2024 17:46 28R N415DL N415DL PC12 4270 Excused by reprocessing Yes 12/8/2024 14:23 28R N218RW N218RW S22T 5303 Excused by reprocessing Yes 12/11/2024 10:35 28R N413AK N413AK SR22 5334 Excused by reprocessing Yes 12/11/2024 2214 28R BYF41 N1483L C182 340 Excused by reprocessing Yes 12/18/2024 8:50 28R BXR8604 N4674B C208 4250 Excused by reprocessing Yes 12/18/2024 21:26 28R N3955X N3955X P28A 3361 Excused by reprocessing Yes Excused by 11 reorocessinq
10/10/2024 22:44 PAD1 CMD8 N838CS EC35 355 Lifeguard Medical Yes 11/6/2024 1 :23 PAD1 CMD8 N838CS EC35 320 Lifeguard Medical Yes 11/7/2024 2:07 PAD1 CMD4 N892CS EC35 5325 Lifeguard Medical Yes 11/14/2024 20:53 PAD1 REH18 N312RX EC35 4206 Lifeguard Medical Yes 11/15/2024 8:42 PAD1 CMD08 N838CS EC35 5326 Lifeguard Medical Yes 11/24/2024 19:24 PAD1 CMDS N838CS EC35 5324 Lifeguard Medical Yes 11/26/2024 20 36 PAD1 CMD8 N838CS EC35 345 Lifeguard Medical Yes 12/1/2024 0:09 PAD1 CMD8 N838CS EC35 5306 Lifeguard Medical Yes 12/13/2024 19:57 PAD1 CMD8 N838CS EC35 361 Lifeguard Medical Yes 12/24/2024 21 :29 PAD1 CMD8 N838CS EC35 375 Lifeguard Medical Yes Lifeguard Medical 10
11/23/2024 5:08 28R N78874 N78874 M20P 4232 Not Acceptable No 11/28/2024 8:59 28R N257CD N257CD SR20 4215 Not Acceptable No 11/28/2024 11 :31 33 N2315M N2315M PA12 4561 Not Acceptable No 11/28/2024 13:46 28R N782JB N782JB M20T 3245 Not Acceptable No Not Acceptable 4
10/3/2024 6:59 28L BXR1960 N9623B C208 340 Time Buffer Yes 12/5/2024 22:07 28R N200SN N200SN SW3 3211 Time Buffer Yes Time Buffer 2
10/1/2024 9:15 28R T210 5341 VFR Departure No
10/1/2024 10:00 33 N9148W N9148W M20T 4557 VFR Departure No 10/1/2024 10:58 28R T210 3354 VFR Departure No
10/1/2024 12:22 28R N24498 N24498 C152 4557 VFR Departure No 10/1/2024 13:15 28R N708WA N708WA P46T 5323 VFR Departure No 10/1/2024 22:38 28R N915L N915L C172 5377 VFR Departure No 10/4/2024 20:10 28R N875DM N875DM BE20 3233 VFR Departure No 1017/2024 12:02 28R N599PM N599PM SR22 6333 VFR Departure No 10/8/2024 7:55 28R C208 366 VFR Departure No
10/10/2024 20:33 28R N850CM N850CM B60T 3727 VFR Departure No 10/10/2024 22: 12 28R N73311 N73311 C172 4275 VFR Departure No Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report Page 36 of 53 Fourth Quarter 2025 Date/Time Runway Flight Tail Aircraft Beacon Code Comments Excused Number Number Type 10/12/2024 17:26 28R N405DB N405DB T206 6306 VFR Departure No 10/13/2024 15:00 28R N151AF N151AF P51 3772 VFR Departure No 10/15/2024 9: 12 33 BXR8603 N106VE C208 334 VFR Departure No 10/18/2024 9:54 33 N3959L N3959L C172 4570 VFR Departure No 10/23/2024 7 :27 28R N903PJ N903PJ PC12 3260 VFR Departure No 10/23/2024 18:37 28R N733ZK N733ZK C172 4236 VFR Departure No 10/24/2024 10:09 33 N619MC N619MC S22T 4263 VFR Departure No 11/5/2024 15:07 28R N257CD N257CD SR20 4201 VFR Departure No 11/6/2024 15:35 28R T210 3645 VFR Departure No
11/9/2024 9:07 33 N5009Q N5009Q C310 5366 VFR Departure No 11/10/202418 :19 28R N456CS N456CS C182 5331 VFR Departure No 11/10/2024 20:52 28R PC12 317 VFR Departure No
11/12/2024 12:26 33 N6605D N6605D C172 4214 VFR Departure No 11/12/2024 20:39 28R FDY8022 N874SA PC12 365 VFR Departure No 11/14/2024 19:36 33 N8312H N8312H P28A 4266 VFR Departure No 11/24/2024 9:48 33 PIAT 4266 VFR Departure No
12/1/2024 10:30 33 N619MC N619MC S22T 4271 VFR Departure No 12/2/2024 10:16 33 PIAT 4261 VFR Departure No
12/4/2024 14:20 33 N52789 N52789 C172 5325 VFR Departure No 12/4/2024 19:28 33 N8312H N8312H P28A 4232 VFR Departure No 12n/2024 15:41 33 N375M N375M RV7 5321 VFR Departure No 12/9/2024 10:18 33 PIAT 4571 VFR Departure No
12/9/2024 16:58 28R N106VE N106VE C208 1200 VFR Departure No 12/10/2024 10:55 33 N619MC N619MC SR22 4552 VFR Departure No 12/10/2024 19:19 33 N8312H N8312H P28A 4566 VFR Departure No 12/11/2024 9:52 33 PIAT 4546 VFR Departure No
12/18/2024 10:55 33 N22QT N22QT DA40 376 VFR Departure No 12/25/2024 21 :00 28R BE20 4241 VFR Departure No
12/31/2024 13:26 28R T210 4211 VFR Departure No
VFR Departure 40
12/5/2024 23:13 28R N233ME N233ME C182 3234 Wide Salad No Wide Salad 1
Grand Count 168
{Return to Table of Contents)
North Field Quiet Hours Departure List for Calendar Quarter Date/Time Flight Tail Aircraft Beacon Runway Comments Excused Number Number Type Code 10/9/2024 6:27 GL5T 3604 28L A TC Instructions No
A TC Instructions 1
11/15/20241 :14 CMD8 N838CS EC35 372 PAD1 Air Traffic Conflict Yes Air Traffic Conflict 1
11/18/2024 0:28 BBQ9705 N625SW B733 3334 28L Audio Not Available No Audio Not Available 1
10/6/2024 0: 28 N334AM N334AM PC12 4567 10L Excused by reprocessing Yes Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report Page 37 of 53 Fourth Quarter 2025 Date/Time Flight Tail Aircraft Beacon Runway Comments Excused Number Number Type Code 11/6/2024 5:23 N504FM N504FM C25A 375 10R Excused by reprocessing Yes 11/14/2024 6: 19 PCM8709 N995FE C208 4203 28L Excused by reprocessing Yes 11/21/2024 6:34 PCM8709 N707FX C208 4277 10R Excused by reprocessing Yes 12/11/2024 22:14 BYF41 N1483L C182 340 28R Excused by reprocessing Yes 12/14/2024 6:27 FGR750 N750FR FASO 3320 10R Excused by reprocessing Yes 12/26/2024 5:46 XSN06 N61RJ PC12 3235 10L Excused by reprocessing Yes 12/26/2024 6:42 PCM8709 N744FX C208 4236 10R Excused by reprocessing Yes Excused by 8 reprocessing
10/7/2024 0:40 N982HP N982HP AS50 351 PAD1 Law Enforcement Yes Law Enforcement 1
10/9/2024 3:09 Medevac C560 4202
'
28R Lifeguard Medical Yes
10/9/2024 22:43 LNSCM36 LN360SN LJ60 4242 28R Lifeguard Medical Yes 10/10/2024 4:29 LN131RR LN131RR C560 4203 28R . Lifeguard Medic.al Yes 10/10/2024 22:44 CMD8 N838CS EC35 355 PAD1 Lifeguard Medical Yes 10/12/2024 4:17 CMD4 N321RX EC35 4551 PAD1 Lifeguard Medical Yes 10/16/2024 2:33 REH50 N913RX BE20 4505 28R Lifeguard Medical Yes .10/22/2024 2: 13 LN116M N116M C25B -3256 28L Lifeguard Medical Yes 10/22/2024 2:48 LN287LS LN287LS BE40 3275 28R Lifeguard Medical Yes 10/25/2024 3:51 LNJZ2 BE20 4243 28R Lifeguard Medical Yes 10/25/2024 22:41 LN131RR N131RR C560 4543 28R Lifeguard Medical Yes 10/25/2024 23:53 LN904LR N904LR C560 3236 28R Lifeguard Medical Yes 10/26/2024 22:45 Medevac BE20 4555 28R Lifeguard Medical Yes 10/28/2024 O: 14 CMD13 N833CS EC35 5334 PAD1 Lifeguard Medical Yes 10/30/2024 1 :37 LN810BE N810BE C560 3240 28L Lifeguard Medical Yes 11/5/20241:41 LN914DK LN914DK BE9L 3272 28R Lifeguard Medical Yes 11/6/2024 1 :23 CMD8 N838CS EC35 320 PAD1 Lifeguard Medical Yes 11/7/2024 2:07 CMD4 N892CS EC35 5325 PAD1 Lifeguard Medical Yes 11/8/2024 3:37 LN131RR LN131RR C560 4245 28R Lifeguard Medical Yes 11/9/2024 6:12 Medevac Medevac BEST 4532 28R Lifeguard Medical Yes 11/11/2024 22:51 CMD70 N370CS BE20 4277 28R Lifeguard Medical Yes 11/15/2024 6:26 LN149WW N149WW C25B 1712
'
28R Lifeguard Medical Yes
11/19/2024 0:07 LN968SR N968SR C560 3231 28R Lifeguard Medical Yes 11/19/2024 23:15 CMD8 N838CS EC35 4552 PAD1 Lifeguard Medical Yes 11/20/2024 0:22 CMD07 N832CS EC35 3371 PAD1 Lifeguard Medical Yes 11/26/2024 2:24 CGBSW CGBSW ASTR 3316 28L Lifeguard Medical Yes 12/1/2024 0:09 CMD8 N838CS EC35 5306 PAD1 Lifeguard Medical Yes 12/5/2024 1 :53 LN810BE N810BE C560 3237 28R Lifeguard Medical Yes 12/5/2024 3:57 LN51GJ LN51GJ LJ35 3357 28L Lifeguard Medical Yes 12/13/2024 4:48 REH50 N911RX BE20 4512 28R Lifeguard Medical Yes • 12/16/2024 2:04 N892CS N892CS EC35 5344 PAD1 Lifeguard_ Medical Yes 12/20/2024 4:01 N838CS N838CS EC35 1200 PAD1 Lifeguard Medical Yes 12/21/2024 2:34 LN498GF N498GF PC12 4542 28L Lifeguard Medical Yes 12/22/2024 22:14 Medevac Medevac C550 4250 28R Lifeguard Medical Yes 12/22/2024 22:24 LN54DD .N54DD C560 3250 28L Lifeguard Medical Yes 12/25/2024 4:39 LN498GF N498GF PC12 4563 28R Lifeguard Medical Yes 12/28/2024 1:00 Medevac Medevac BE20 4532 28R Lifeguard Medical Yes 10n/2024 22: 19 LN54DD N54DD C560 3324 28R Lifeguard Medical Yes 10/4/2024 1:55 LN54DD N54DD C560 3306 28R Lifeguard Medical Yes Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report Page 38 of 53 Fourth Quarter 2025 Date/Time Flight Tail Aircraft Beacon Runway Comments Excused Number Number Type Code 10/4/2024 6:52 LN810BE N810BE C560 3201 28R Lifeguard Medical Yes Lifeguard Medical 39
11/15/2024 4:18 N325RX N325RX EC35 1200 PAD1 Not Acceptable No 11/19/2024 6:18 GDG626 N626NT F2TH 3355 28L Not Acceptable No 11/21/2024 22:20 GALX 3201 10R Not Acceptable No
11/21/2024 23:05 N100VE N100VE CL60 3371 10R Not Acceptable No 11/21/2024 23:41 N281SC N281SC F2TH 3326 10R Not Acceptable No 11/22/2024 0:06 GLEX 3376 10R Not Acceptable No
11/23/2024 5:08 N78874 N78874 M20P 4232 28R Not Acceptable No 11/24/2024 23:54 CL60 4237 10L Not Acceptable No
11/28/2024 0:23 N26EM N26EM PA46 3254 28R Not Acceptable No 12/14/2024 0:30 ASTR 3244 10R Not Acceptable No
12/14/2024 4:09 GLF4 3327 10R Not Acceptable No
Not Acceptable 11
10/17/2024 6:24 N815RM N815RM HDJT 3237 28R Pilot Requested No 10/26/2024 23: 11 EJA902 N902QS C68A 4215 28R Pilot Requested No 12/6/2024 22:39 N551SJ N551SJ C551 3362 28L Pilot Requested No Pilot Requested 3
10/6/2024 22:49 SWA5680 N909WN B737 3260 28L RWY 30 Routine Closure Yes 10/7/2024 5:17 SWA261 N1809U B38M 3302 28L RWY 30 Routine Closure Yes 10/7/2024 5:23 SWA427 N8738K B38M 3303 28L RWY 30 Routine Closure Yes 10/7/2024 5:35 NKS278 N976NK A20N 3204 28L RWY 30 Routine Closure Yes 10/14/2024 1:54 SWA2988 N230WN B737 3357 28L RWY 30 Routine Closure Yes 10/21/2024 4:57 GLF5 3374 28L RWY 30 Routine Closure Yes 12/16/2024 5:35 NKS278 N992NK A20N 3315 28L RWY 30 Routine Closure Yes 12/16/2024 5:36 SWA329 N8797Q B38M 3277 28L RWY 30 Routine Closure Yes RWY 30 Routine Closure 8
12/1/2024 22:12 N69P N69P PC12 3736 28R Strraight-out Departure No Strraight-out Departure 1
10/3/2024 6:59 BXR1960 N9623B C208 340 28L Time Buffer Yes 10/9/2024 6:59 PCM8260 N781FE C208 4214 28L Time Buffer Yes 11/8/2024 6: 55 PCM8260 N892FE C208 4533 28L Time Buffer Yes 11/21/2024 6:52 PCM8711 N872FE C208 4256 10R Time Buffer Yes 11/24/2024 22:05 N525JN N525JN C25A 4531 28R Time Buffer Yes 11/27/2024 6:50 S22T 4211 28R Time Buffer Yes
11/27/2024 6:53 PCM8710 N872FE C208 4253 28L Time Buffer Yes 12/5/2024 22:07 N200SN N200SN SW3 3211 28R Time Buffer Yes 12/6/2024 6:57 PCM8679 N969FE C208 4216 28L Time Buffer Yes 12/26/2024 22 08 N78874 N78874 M20P 4224 10L Time Buffer Yes Time Buffer 10
10/10/2024 22:12 N73311 N73311 C172 4275 28R VFR Departure No VFR Departure 1
11/19/2024 6:44 BE9T 4243 28R Weather/Wind Conditions No Weather/Wind 1 Conditions
10/1/2024 22:38 N915L N915L C172 5377 28R Wide Salad No 10/4/2024 1:24 N26EM N26EM M600 3222 28R Wide Salad No
10/4/2024 2:05 N224JM N224JM S22T 3347 28R Wide Salad No 10/17/2024 23:31 N617BG N617BG PC12 4273 28R Wide Salad No Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report Page 39 of 53 Fourth Quarter 2025 Date/Time Flight Tail Aircraft Beacon Runway Comments Excused Number Number Type Code 10/18/ 2024 23:35 BE20 4566 28R Wide Salad No
10/20/ 2024 6:46 BE20 4560 28R Wide Salad No
10/28/2024 1 :26 BE20 4507 28R Wide Salad No
1117/2024 23:07 TN61AP N61AP BE20 3376 28R Wide Salad No 11/8/2024 6:40 N515TW N515TW PC12 3665 28R Wide Salad No 11/11/2024 1 :56 N914DK N914DK BE9L 3204 28R Wide Salad No 11/ 13/2024 6:45 PCM8711 N872FE C208 4272 28L Wide Salad No 12/5/2024 23:13 N233ME N233ME C182 3234 28R Wide Salad No 12/17/2024 6:08 PCM8709 N984FE C208 4240 28L Wide Salad No 12/17/2024 6:36 PCM8711 N762FE C208 4541 28L Wide Salad No 12/18/2024 6:26 PCM8711 N762FE C208 21 240 28L Wide Salad No 12/20/2024 22:27 N61AP N61AP BE20 6374 28R Wide Salad No 12/27/2024 4:46 BE20 4220 28R Wide Salad No
Wide Salad 17
Grand Count 103
(Return to Table of Contents)
North Field Quiet Hours SEL List for Calendar Quarter
Date Time NMT Lmax SEL Duration Flight Tail Aircraft Runway (seconds) Number Number Type 10/2/2024 6:57 14 76.6 85 14 PCM8679 N771FE C208 28L
10/4/2024 1 :56 4 76.5 86.9 27 LN54DD N54DD C560 28R
10/4/2024 1 :56 5 76.8 87.2 31 LN54DD N54DD C560 28R
10/4/2024 6:53 4 84.7 91.9 23 LN810BE N810BE C560 28R
10/4/2024 6:53 5 87.8 93.9 24 LN810BE N810BE C560 28R
10/4/2024 6:53 6 84.2 91.8 29 LN810BE N810BE C560 28R
10/6/2024 22:50 4 84.4 91.4 26 SWA5680 N909WN B737 28L
10/6/2024 22:50 5 88.4 95.1 27 SWA5680 N909WN B737 28L
10/6/2024 22:50 6 83.7 92 27 SWA5680 N909WN B737 28L
10/6/2024 22:50 7 79.3 88 .. 3 26 SWA5680 N909WN B737 28L 10/7/2024 5:18 4 83.7 90 25 SWA261 N1809U B38M 28L
10/7/2024 5:18 5 87.4 93.8 20 SWA261 N1809U B38M 28L
10/7/2024 5:18 6 80.6 89.3 27 SWA261 N1809U B38M 28L
10/7/2024 5:23 4 80.9 87.8 24 SWA427 N8738K B38M 28L
10/7/2024 5:23 5 85.8 92.1 21 SWA427 N8738K B38M 28L
10/7/2024 5:23 6 79 87.9 25 SWA427 N8738K B38M 28L
10/7/2024 5:35 4 80.7 87.3 28 NKS278 N976NK A20N 28L
10/7/2024 5:35 5 82.4 89.6 25 NKS278 N976NK A20N 28L
10/7/2024 5:36 6 78.4 87 24 NKS278 N976NK A20N 28L
10/7/2024 22:20 4 81.7 88.1 17 LN54DD N54DD C560 28R
10/7/2024 22:20 5 81 .9 88.6 16 LN54DD N54DD C560 28R
10/7/2024 22:20 6 79.9 87.2 22 LN54DD N54DD C560 28R
10/9/2024 3: 10 4 86.4 93.9 41 Medevac C560 28R
10/9/2024 3: 10 5 85.3 94.4 38 Medevac C560 28R
10/9/2024 6:28 4 83.7 90.3 22 GL5T 28L
10/9/2024 6:28 5 91 .8 97 18 GL5T 28L
10/9/2024 6:28 6 87.5 94.2 26 GL5T 28L
Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report Page 40 of 53 Fourth Quarter 2025 Date Time NMT Lmax SEL Duration Flight Tail Aircraft Runway (seconds) Number Number Type 10/9/2024 6:28 7 81.5 89.6 20 GL5T 28L
10/9/2024 22:44 4 82.5 89 17 LNSCM36 LN360SN LJ60 28R
10/9/2024 22:44 5 79.6 87.8 18 LNSCM36 LN360SN LJ60 28R 10/9/2024 22:44 6 78.6 85.7 18 LNSCM36 LN360SN LJ60 28R 10/10/2024 4:29 5 84.7 92.7 27 LN131RR LN131RR C560 28R 10/10/2024 4:29 4 88.2 96.8 35 LN131RR LN131RR C560 28R 10/10/2024 4:29 6 85.2 92.3 22 LN131RR LN131RR C560 28R 10/14/20241:54 4 79.2 87.8 24 SWA2988 N230WN 8737 28L
10/14/2024 1 :54 5 83.4 90.9 25 SWA2988 N230WN 8737 28L 10/17/2024 6:25 4 83 89.4 20 N815RM N815RM HDJT 28R
10/17/2024 6:25 5 77 85.9 23 N815RM N815RM HDJT 28R
10/17/2024 6:25 6 77.9 86.2 23 N815RM N815RM HDJT . 28R 10/21/2024 4:57 5 86.2 92.4 20 GLF5 28L
10/21/2024 4:57 4 83.9 89.8 18 GLF5 28L
10/21/2024 4:57 6 82.9 89.4 24 GLF5 28L
10/21/2024 4:57 7 76.9 85.1 19 GLF5 28L
10/22/2024 2: 14 5 84.5 91 .2 29 LN116AA N116AA C25B 28L 10/22/2024 2:14 4 79.9 87.3 18 LN116AA N116AA C25B 28L
10/22/2024 2: 14 6 79.7 88 27 LN116AA N116AA C25B 28L
10/22/2024 2:49 4 93.5 100.3 23 LN287LS LN287LS 8E40 28R 10/22/2024 2:49 5 86.3 93.2 31 LN287LS LN287LS 8E40 28R 10/22/2024 2:49 6 86.9 95 35 LN287LS LN287LS 8E40 28R
10/22/2024 2:49 7 82.2 91.6 31 LN287LS LN287LS 8E40 28R 10/22/2024 6:50 7 71 85.5 80 PCM8711 N867FE C208 28L
10/23/2024 6:21 4 80.9 84.9 9 PCM8711 N920FE C208 28L
10/23/2024 6:52 8 75.9 86.2 28 PCM8710 N744FX C208 28L
10/24/2024 6:37 4 83.8 87.2 10 PCM8711 N920FE C208 28L
10/25/2024 3:51 4 83.3 86.6 12 LNJZ2 BE20 28R
10/25/2024 22:42 4 90.9 98.1 28 LN131RR N131RR C560 28R 10/25/2024 22:42 5 85.5 94.1 34 LN131RR N131RR C560 28R 10/25/2024 22:42 6 88 96.5 47 LN131RR N131RR C560 28R
10/25/2024 22:42 7 81.9 91 .6 27 LN131RR N131RR C560 28R 10/25/2024 23:53 4 83.5 95.1 39 LN904LR N904LR C560 28R 10/25/2024 23:53 5 82.5 93.3 41 LN904LR N904LR C560 28R 10/25/2024 23:53 6 79 90.5 54 LN904LR N904LR C560 28R
10/25/2024 23:54 7 74.2 86.1 47 LN904LR N904LR C560 28R 10/26/2024 22:46 4 83 86.6 13 Medevac 8E20 28R
10/26/2024 23: 11 4 81.4 88.1 20 EJA902 N902QS C68A 28R 10/26/2024 23: 11 5 80.4 87.1 14 EJA902 N902QS C68A 28R 10/28/2024 1 :26 4 83.1 86.5 12 8E20 28R
10/29/2024 6:37 7 68 86.3 80 PCM8711 N867FE C208 28L
10/30/2024 1 :38 4 76.9 86 28 LN810BE N8108E C560 28L
10/30/2024 1 :38 5 79 88 35 LN810BE N8108E C560 28L
11/5/2024 1 :42 4 86.2 90.2 36 LN914DK LN914DK 8E9L 28R 11/5/2024 1 :43 8 82.6 87.5 11 LN914DK LN914DK 8E9L 28R 11/7/2024 23:07 4 80.2 85.1 11 TN61AP N61AP 8E20 28R
11/8/2024 3:37 4 86.9 94.7 31 LN131RR LN131RR C560 28R
11/8/2024 3:37 5 89.3 96.6 27 LN131RR LN131RR C560 28R
11/8/2024 3:37 6 86 94.3 29 LN131RR LN131RR C560 28R
11/11/2024 1 :56 4 83.1 86.4 12 N914DK N914DK BE9L 28R
11/12/2024 6:26 4 81 .1 85.9 11 PCM8711 N872FE C208 28L Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report Page 41 of 53 Fourth Quarter 2025 Date Time NMT Lmax SEL Duration Flight Tail Aircraft Runway (seconds) Number Number Type 11/13/2024 6:32 4 82.1 85.5 12 PCM8709 N762FE C208 28L
11/13/2024 6:46 4 81 .5 86 12 PCM8711 N872FE C208 28L
11/14/2024 6:21 4 82 86.6 13 PCM8709 N995FE C208 28L
11/15/2024 6:27 4 80.7 89.4 30 LN149VVVV N149VVVV C25B 28R 11/15/2024 6:27 5 81 .3 89.4 30 LN149VVVV N149VVVV C25B 28R 11/15/2024 6:27 6 77.8 87.9 39 LN149VVVV N149VVVV C25B 28R 11/18/2024 0:28 5 83.2 92.3 35 BBQ9705 N625SW B733 28L
11/18/2024 0:28 4 82.5 92 36 BBQ9705 N625SW B733 28L
11/18/2024 0:29 6 78.8 89.6 47 BBQ9705 N625SW B733 28L
11/18/2024 0:29 7 75.8 87.3 42 BBQ9705 N625SW B733 28L
11/19/2024 0:08 4 82.6 95.1 70 LN968SR N968SR C560 28R
11/19/2024 0:08 5 81.4 93.8 62 LN968SR N968SR C560 28R
11/19/2024 0:08 6 79.4 92 78 LN968SR N968SR C560 28R
11/19/2024 0:08 7 73.8 87.6 57 LN968SR N968SR C560 28R
11/19/2024 0:08 8 73.2 86.5 43 LN968SR N968SR C560 28R
11/19/2024 6:18 4 81.8 89.4 24 GDG626 N626NT F2TH 28L
11/19/2024 6:18 5 84.5 92.5 24 GDG626 N626NT F2TH 28L
11/19/2024 6:18 6 81.5 90.1 32 GDG626 N626NT F2TH 28L
11/19/2024 6:19 7 75.8 85.9 24 GDG626 N626NT F2TH 28L
11/19/2024 6:43 7 73.5 86 80 BE9T 28R
11/19/2024 6:44 4 79.6 85.4 13 BE9T 28R
11/19/2024 6:48 4 81.1 86 17 PCM8709 N896FE C208 28R
11/21/2024 2:07 9 76.2 87.2 34 LN968SR N968SR C560 10L
11/21/2024 6:34 10 76.9 85.3 80 PCM8709 N707FX C208 10R 11/21/2024 22:21 9 80.1 87.2 17 GALX 10R
11/21/2024 22:21 12 79 86.6 27 GALX 10R
11/22/2024 6:45 10 76 86.4 49 NJZ3 N999NJ GALX 10R
11/22/2024 6:45 9 79.8 88.6 26 NJZ3 N999NJ GALX 10R
11/22/2024 6:59 9 81 88.8 25 VJA549 N549XJ CL30 10R
11/23/2024 6:46 4 80 85.7 12 PCM8702 N872FE C208 28L
11/24/2024 22:06 4 80.5 88.5 24 N525JN N525JN C25A 28R
11/24/2024 22:06 5 79.1 87.5 26 N525JN N525JN C25A 28R
11/24/2024 22:06 6 76 85.5 32 N525JN N525JN C25A 28R
11/26/2024 2:25 4 81 87.9 25 CGBSW CGBSW ASTR 28L
11/26/2024 2:25 5 92.2 97.1 18 CGBSW CGBSW ASTR 28L
11/26/2024 2:25 6 88.5 94.1 25 CGBSW CGBSW ASTR 28L
11/26/2024 2:25 7 80.7 89.1 27 CGBSW CGBSW ASTR 28L
11/26/2024 6 :40 4 81.2 85.8 12 PCM8711 N762FE C208 28L 11/27/2024 6:37 4 81.4 85.6 12 PCM8711 N762FE C208 28L
11/27/2024 6:51 4 80.1 86.4 19 S22T 28R
11/27/2024 6:54 4 81 .3 86.1 13 PCM8710 N872FE C208 28L 11/29/2024 6:32 4 82.6 86.7 12 PCM8711 N762FE C208 28L
12/3/2024 0:06 4 80.8 85.1 11 N912MF N912MF BE20 28R
12/5/2024 1 :54 4 82.5 90.2 23 LN810BE N810BE C560 28R
12/5/2024 1 :54 5 80.8 88.7 25 LN810BE N810BE C560 28R
12/5/2024 1 :54 6 76.6 86 21 LN810BE N810BE C560 28R
12/5/2024 3:57 5 95.5 98.9 12 LN51GJ LN51GJ LJ35 28L
12/5/2024 3:57 6 93.2 96.6 12 LN51GJ LN51GJ LJ35 28L
12/5/2024 3:58 7 87.6 92.5 14 LN51GJ LN51GJ LJ35 28L
12/5/2024 23:14 4 77.7 86.5 23 N233ME N233ME C182 28R
12/6/2024 6:58 5 82.1 85.6 10 PCM8679 N969F.E C208 28L
Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report Page 42 of 53 Fourth Quarter 2025 Date Time NMT Lmax SEL Duration Flight Tail Aircraft Runway (seconds) Number Number Type 12/6/2024 22:40 5 86.1 91 .9 27 N551SJ N551SJ C551 28L
12/6/2024 22:40 6 82.9 89.2 17 N551SJ N551SJ C551 28L
12/10/2024 4:27 4 77.1 87 31 LN54DD N54DD C560 28R
12/10/2024 4:27 5 80 89.4 · 36 LN54DD N54DD C560 28R
12/13/2024 4:48 4 84.1 87.6 9 REH50 N911RX BE20 28R
12/13/2024 6:16 4 80.7 86.3 12 PCM8709 N722FX C208 28L
12/13/2024 6:44 4 81 .6 85.1 10 PCM8711 N762FE C208 28L 12/14/2024 2:49 9 80.3 87.9 17 LN149V\NV N149V\NV C25B 10R 12/14/2024 6:27 4 80.9 89.4 40 FGR750 N750FR FA50 10R
12/14/2024 6:28 10 81 .8 91.3 75 FGR750 N750FR FA50 10R 12/14/2024 6:28 9 89.3 96.2 36 FGR750 N750FR FA50 10R
12/14/2024 6:28 11 84 92.3 32 FGR750 N750FR FA50 10R
12/16/2024 5:35 4 81 .2 87.1 27 NKS278 N992NK A20N 28L
12/16/2024 5:35 5 85.4 91.5 19 NKS278 N992NK A20N 28L
12/16/2024 5:35 6 80 87.8 20 NKS278 N992NK A20N 28L
12/16/2024 5:37 4 83.5 90.4 29 SWA329 N8797Q B38M 28L
12/16/2024 5:37 5 85.7 93.3 25 SWA329 N8797Q B38M 28L
12/16/2024 5:37 6 80.3 89.7 23 SWA329 N8797Q B38M 28L
12/16/2024 5:37 7 76.8 86.8 25 SWA329 N8797Q B38M 28L
12/17/2024 6:10 4 79.2 85.3 15 PCM8709 N984FE C208 28L
12/18/2024 6:1 5 4 81 .6 85.8 10 PCM8709 N772FE C208 28L 12/20/2024 6:25 4 79.2 86.4 21 S22T 28R
12/22/2024 22:14 4 84.6 90.3 15 Medevac Medevac C550 28R 12/22/2024 22: 14 5 82.7 89.5 16 Medevac Medevac C550 28R 12/22/2024 22: 14 6 82.9 88.8 16 Medevac Medevac C550 28R 12/22/2024 22: 14 7 77.2 85 17 Medevac Medevac C550 28R 12/22/2024 22:25 4 76.2 85.3 27 LN54DD N54DD C560 28L
12/22/2024 22:25 5 79.5 88.4 22 LN54DD N54DD C560 28L
12/24/2024 6:35 4 80.4 85.1 12 PCM8711 N762FE C208 28L
12/26/2024 6:43 10 77.3 85.1 80 PCM8709 N744FX C208 10R 12/28/2024 1 :01 4 84.4 88.4 12 Medevac Medevac BE20 28R (Return to Table of Contents)
Runway 30 BFI Right Turn Departure List for Calendar Quarter Date/Time Flight Tail Airline Aircraft Type Aircraft Comment Excused Number Number Category 10/10/2024 11: 13 SWA SWA2623 B38M J N8867Q Fleet Week Yes 10/10/2024 13:00 SKW SKW4134 E75L R N272SY Fleet Week Yes 10/13/2024 15:33 ASA ASA1218 B39M J N933AK Fleet Week Yes 10/13/2024 15: 13 F2TH B Fleet Week Yes
10/13/2024 14:27 SWA SWA4152 B737 J N232WN Fleet Week Yes 10/13/2024 14:22 SWA SWA1474 B38M J N8926Q Fleet Week Yes 10/13/2024 13:53 SWA SWA332 B38M J N8885Q Fleet Week Yes 10/13/2024 12 59 SKW SKW4134 E75L R N276SY Fleet Week Yes 10/13/2024 12:37 SWA SWA1059 B737 J N932WN Fleet Week Yes 10/13/2024 12:19 SWA SWA2897 B38M J N8877Q Fleet Week Yes 10/12/2024 14:42 ASA ASA1247 B737 J N612AS Fleet Week Yes 10/12/202414 :10 SWA SWA4202 B737 J N7861J Fleet Week Yes Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report Page 43 of 53 Fourth Quarter 2025 Date/Time Flight Tail Airline Aircraft Type Aircraft Comment Excused Number Number Category 10/12/2024 13:13 EJA EJA696 C68A 8 N696QS Fleet Week Yes 10/10/2024 1319 PXT PXT150 C680 8 N150TG Fleet Week Yes 10/10/2024 13 22 SWA SWA3746 838M J N8806Q Fleet Week Yes 10/10/2024 14:43 SWA SWA2960 8737 J N225WN Fleet Week Yes 10/10/2024 14:44 FOX FDX3884 8763 J N188FE Fleet Week Yes 10/10/2024 15:29 ASA ASA1247 8739 J N467AS Fleet Week Yes 10/10/2024 15:37 FOX FDX3312 8763 J N144FE Fleet Week Yes 10/10/2024 16:11 SWA SWA1474 8738 J N8519R Fleet Week Yes 10/10/2024 16:17 FOX FDX9183 877L J N855FO Fleet Week Yes 10/10/2024 17: 10 GLF4 8 Fleet Week Yes
10/10/2024 17:11 SWA SWA4020 8737 J N792SW Fleet Week Yes 10/11/2024 12:25 SWA SWA914 8737 J N401WN Fleet Week Yes 10/11/2024 12:41 SWA SWA4270 8738 J N8689C Fleet Week Yes 10/11/2024 12:48 SWA SWA4522 8737 J N468WN Fleet Week Yes 10/11/2024 12:54 SWA SWA1441 8737 J N298WN Fleet Week Yes 10/11/2024 12:59 WSN WSN95 J328 J N395MS Fleet Week Yes 10/11/2024 13:00 SWA SWA1969 8737 J N245WN Fleet Week Yes 10/11/2024 13:32 SWA SWA3746 8738 J N8581Z ' Fleet Week Yes 10/11/2024 14:22 SKW SKW4134 E75L R N285SY Fleet Week Yes 10/11/2024 14:38 SWA SWA9005 8737 J N467WN Fleet Week Yes 10/11/2024 15:45 ASA ASA1247. 8739 J N477AS Fleet Week Yes 10/11/2024 16:19 RKJ RKJ225 C750 8 N225GT Fleet Week Yes 10/12/2024 12:26 SWA SWA3777 838M J N8812Q Fleet Week Yes 10/12/2024 12:34 JTL JTL222 C750 8 N222FY Fleet Week Yes 10/12/2024 12:55 GLFS 8 Fleet Week Yes
10/12/2024 13:06 WSN WSN95 J328 J N395MS Fleet Week Yes Fleet Week 38
12/14/2024 12:10 SWA SWA4861 838M J N8889Q Not Acceptable No 12/14/2024 11 :03 SWA SWA2651 8737 J N943WN Not Acceptable No 12/14/2024 10:23 SWA SWA2077 8737 J N961WN Not Acceptable No 12/14/2024 9:50 SWA SWA902 8737 J N915WN Not Acceptable No 12/10/2024 2:56 GALX 8 Not Acceptable No
11/11/2024 15:31 N881VP C56X 8 N881VP Not Acceptable No 12/19/2024 4:53 UPS UPS2947 MO11 J N294UP Not Acceptable No 12/10/2024 15:24 FOX FOX3854 8763 J N276FE Not Acceptable No 12/28/2024 7:34 PXT PXT150 C680 8 N150TG Not Acceptable No Not Acceptable 9
(Return to Table of Contents)
Night Time Departure Procedure List for Calendar Quarter Date/Time Airline Flight Aircraft Aircraft Tail Number Comment Excused Number Type Category 10/2/2024 6: 19 UPS UPS2945 MO11 J N260UP Air Traffic Conflict Yes 10/4/2024 6:37 SWA SWA2515 8738 J N8687A Air Traffic Conflict Yes 10/5/2024 6: 11 UPS UPS5945 8763 J N368UP Air Traffic Conflict Yes 10/6/2024 6:18 SWA SWA1994 838M J N8781Q Air Traffic Conflict Yes 10/9/2024 6:34 UPS UPS2633 8763 J N385UP Air Traffic Conflict Yes Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report Page 44 of 53 Fourth Quarter 2025 Date/Time Airline Flight Aircraft Aircraft Tail Number Comment Excused Number Type Category 10/10/2024 6:30 UPS UPS2951 B752 J N420UP Air Traffic Conflict Yes 10/10/2024 6:49 UPS UPS2941 B763 J N358UP Air Traffic Conflict Yes 10/13/2024 6:12 SWA SWA1994 B38M J N8758L Air Traffic Conflict Yes 10/18/2024 6:42 SWA SWA2515 B38M J N8908Q Air Traffic Conflict Yes 10/28/2024 22:49 DAL DAL540 B739 J N926DZ Air Traffic Conflict Yes 10/29/2024 23:07 GLF6 B Air Traffic Conflict Yes
10/30/2024 6:41 SWA SWA427 B737 J N457WN Air Traffic Conflict Yes 11/9/2024 6:16 FOX FDX435 B763 J N196FE Air Traffic Conflict Yes 11/11/2024 5 36 SWA SWA3074 B738 J N8575Z Air Traffic Conflict Yes 11/16/2024 6:26 PXT PXT862 E55P B N862LG Air Traffic Conflict Yes 11/17/2024 6:28 SWA SWA1381 B738 J N8628A Air Traffic Conflict Yes 12/1/2024 6:16 F2TH B Air Traffic Conflict Yes
12/1/2024 6:17 SWA SWA1404 B738 J N8545V Air Traffic Conflict Yes 12/1/2024 22:30 UPS UPS2453 MD11 J N262UP Air Traffic Conflict Yes 12/7/2024 5:36 SWA SWA3074 B38M J N8905Q Air Traffic Conflict Yes 12/13/2024 6:30 UPS UPS5945 MD11 J N259UP Air Traffic Conflict Yes 12/15/2024 6:20 SWA SWA756 B737 J N7749B Air Traffic Conflict Yes 12/27/2024 5:13 SWA SWA3877 B738 J N8676A Air Traffic Conflict Yes 12/27/2024 5:20 SWA SWA1542 B737 J N7887A Air Traffic Conflict Yes Air Traffic Conflict 24
10/14/2024 5:20 SWA SWA261 B38M J N8705Q Excused by reprocessing Yes 10/16/2024 2:35 FOX FDX1879 B763 J N280FE Excused by reprocessing Yes 10/18/2024 6:33 FOX FDX435 MD11 J N528FE Excused by reprocessing Yes 10/29/2024 2: 58 FOX FOX37 MD11 J N621FE Excused by reprocessing Yes 12/12/2024 2:52 FOX FOX1879 B763 J N173FE Excused by reprocessing Yes 12/16/2024 23:18 GALX B Excused by reprocessing Yes
Excused by 6 reprocessing
10/4/2024 5:36 SWA SWA8508 B737 J N291WN Not Acceptable No 10/6/2024 0:46 N641TW CL60 B N641TW Not Acceptable No
10/7/2024 6:21 SWA SWA974 B38M J N8740A Not Acceptable No 10/20/2024 4:05 UPS UPS947 B763 J N328UP Not Acceptable No 10/20/2024 4:07 FOX FDX411 MD11 J N599FE Not Acceptable No 10/22/2024 23:25 VOS VOS5323 A20N J N548VL Not Acceptable No 10/29/2024 4:51 FOX FDX417 A306 J N731FD Not Acceptable No 10/30/2024 3:59 EJA EJA729 CL35 B N729QS Not Acceptable No 11/3/2024 5:46 SWA SWA1665 B737 J N7811F Not Acceptable No 11/5/2024 4:54 FOX FDX417 A306 J N730FD Not Acceptable No 11/15/2024 22: 11 SWA SWA4569 B737 J N7738A Not Acceptable No 11/23/2024 5: 32 SWA SWA3074 B38M J N8933Q Not Acceptable No 11/23/2024 6:28 FOX FOX435 B763 J N180FE Not Acceptable No 11/26/2024 22:22 SWA SWA3849 B38M J N8756S Not Acceptable No 11/26/2024 22:26 SWA SWA4062 B737 J N7852A Not Acceptable No 11/26/2024 22:46 USC USC47 LJ35 B N217CK Not Acceptable No 11/26/2024 23:08 VOi VOl1773 A321 J XAVLZ Not Acceptable No 11/27/2024 22:50 NKS NKS1448 A320 J N636NK Not Acceptable No 11/27/2024 22:59 EJA EJA635 C68A B N635QS Not Acceptable No 11/27/2024 23:09 SWA SWA3849 B38M J N8756S Not Acceptable No 11/27/2024 23:14 SWA SWA4062 B737 J N7735A Not Acceptable No 11/27/2024 23:18 VOi VOl1773 A321 J XAVRC Not Acceptable No 11/27/2024 23:52 F900 B Not Acceptable No
12/1/2024 22:45 SWA SWA4718 B737 J N404WN Not Accep table No Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report Page 45 of 53 Fourth Quarter 2025 Date/Time Airline Flight Aircraft Aircraft Tail Number Comment Excused Number Type Category 12/1/2024 23:07 VOi VOI1773 A21N J XAVUB Not Acceptable No 12/8/2024 3:19 UPS UPS945 MD11 J N273UP Not Acceptable No 12/8/2024 23:29 VOi VOl1773 A321 J XAVLJ Not Acceptable No 12/9/2024 6:09 LXJ LXJ336 E545 B N336FX Not Acceptable No 12/10/2024 2:56 GALX • B Not Acceptable No
12/15/2024 23:21 VIV VIV587 A320 J XAVAU Not Acceptable No 12/18/2024 4:08 FDX FDX77 B77L J N879FD Not Acceptable No 12/19/2024 4:53 UPS UPS2947 MD11 J N294UP Not Acceptable No 12/27/2024 5:21 SWA SWA1665 B738 J N8650F Not Acceptable No 12/27/2024 5:33 SWA SWA157 B737 J N551WN Not Acceptable No Not Acceptable 34
10/1/2024 6:58 FDX FDX864 B763 J N191FE Time Buffer Yes 10/5/2024 6:58 SWA SWA261 B738 J N8648A Time Buffer Yes 10/9/2024 6:57 FDX FDX3671 B77L J N875FD Time Buffer Yes 10/9/2024 6:59 FDX FDX3647 B763 J N153FE Time Buffer Yes 10/15/2024 6:55 FDX FDX864 B763 J N163FE Time Buffer Yes 10/22/2024 6:58 SWA SWA427 B737 J N7735A Time Buffer Yes 10/23/2024 6:58 SWA SWA1900 B737 J N288WN Time Buffer Yes 10/29/2024 5:58 N2AK SF50 B N2AK Time Buffer Yes
10/29/2024 6:58 UPS UPS2951 B752 J N457UP Time Buffer Yes 10/30/2024 6:57 UPS UPS2945 MD11 J N262UP Time Buffer Yes 10/30/2024 6:58 SWA SWA1900 B737 J N217JC Time Buffer Yes 10/31/2024 6:56 UPS UPS2941 B763 J N358UP Time Buffer Yes 11/5/2024 6:59 UPS UPS2941 B763 J N369UP Time Buffer Yes 11/9/2024 6:59 SWA SWA887 B738 J N8693A Time Buffer Yes 11/12/2024 6:59 FDX FDX864 B763 J N129FE Time Buffer Yes 11/14/2024 6:57 UPS UPS2941 B763 J N361UP Time Buffer Yes 12/1/2024 22:00 SWA SWA4599 B738 J N8538V Time Buffer Yes 12/1/2024 22:08 VOS VOS4323 A20N J N549VL Time Buffer Yes 12/4/2024 6:51 HAL HAL23 A21N J N223HA Time Buffer Yes
12/9/2024 6:59 HAL HAL23 A21N J N215HA Time Buffer Yes
12/11/2024 6:59 FDX FDX864 B763 J N282FE Time Buffer Yes 12/13/2024 6:58 UPS UPS2941 B763 J N396UP Time Buffer Yes 12/16/2024 6:59 HAL HAL23 A21N J N220HA Time Buffer Yes 12/22/2024 22:00 GALX B Time Buffer Yes
12/24/2024 6:57 FDX FDX3671 B77L J N876FD Time Buffer Yes 12/31/2024 6:58 SWA SWA1358 B738 J N8681 M Time Buffer Yes Time Buffer 26
Grand Count 90
(Return to Table of Contents)
Runway 12 Night Departure List for Calendar Quarter
Date/Time Airline Flight Aircraft Aircraft Tail No Comment Excused No Type Category 12/27/2024 4:08 FDX FDX5319 B77L J N868FD Not Acceptable No Not Acceptable 1
11/25/2024 4:20 FDX FDX417 B763 J N168FE Pilot Refusal No Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report Page 46 of 53 Fourth Quarter 2025 Date/Time Airline Flight Aircraft Aircraft Tail No Comment Excused No Type Category Pilot Refusal 1
11/21/2024 3:59 FDX FDX9077 MD11 J N610FE System Error Yes System Error 1
Grand Count 3
(Return to Table of Contents)
Engine Run-up List for Calendar Quarter
Date Request Air Aircraft Engine(s) Power Location Proposed Lmax Lmax Time Carrier Start Time >70 dB >75 dB
101412024 1209 PCJ C25A 2 High HG6 1500 NIA NIA
1011212024 0626 PCJ C25A 2 High GRE 0628 NO NIA
1011812024 1107 TWY C56X 1 High HG6 1115 NIA NIA
1012412024 0900 PCJ C25A 2 High HG6 0910 NIA NIA
1012412024 1942 FOX 8757 2 High GRE 2000 NIA NO
1012512024 1738 FOX MO11 2 High GRE 1800 NIA NIA
1012812024 0040 FOX MO11 3 High GRE 0050 NO NIA
111712024 0833 HAL 8767 2 High GRE 0845 NIA NIA
1111512024 2056 FOX 8767 2 High GRE 2115 NIA NO
1111612024 2320 FOX 8777 2 High GRE 2345 NO NIA
1112312024 0900 UPS 8767 2 High GRE 0900 NIA NIA
1112412024 2127 HAL A320 2 High GRE 2230 NO NIA
1113012024 0744 UPS 8767 1 High GRE 0800 NIA NIA
1113012024 0954 UPS 8767 2 High GRE 1030 NO NO
121412024 0252 FOX A320 2 High GRE 0345 NO NIA
121512024 1103 FOX A320 2 High GRE 1110 NIA NIA
121612024 1450 VHT FA20 2 High HG6 1510 NIA NIA
121912024 0903 PCJ C25A 1 High HG6 0904 NIA NIA
1211212024 1756 TWY GALX 2 High HG6 1830 NIA NIA
1211812024 0730 PCJ C500 1 High HG6 0745 NIA NIA
1212212024 1330 PCJ C500 1 High HG6 1340 NIA NIA
1212312024 1457 PCJ C525 2 High HG6 1530 NIA NIA
1212512024 2020 FOX 8777 1 High GRE 2030 NIA NO
1212612024 1254 KFS G100 2 High HG6 1300 NIA NIA
1213012024 1105 PCJ C56X 1 High HG6 1915 NIA NO
1212912024 1907 PCJ C56X 2 High GRE 1915 NIA NO
(Return to Table of Contents)
Runway 30 East Turn Departures List for Calendar Quarter Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report Page 47 of 53 Fourth Quarter 2025 Date Time Airline Flight Aircraft Altitude (ft) Comment Excused Number Type 12/5/2024 17:04 SKW SKW3903 E75L 2870 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 11/12/202419 :1 5 FOX FDX1268 8763 2880 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 11/3/2024 20:06 SWA SWA4625 8738 2591 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 11/1/2024 19:47 SWA SWA1130 8738 2562 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 10/27/2024 10:45 LXJ LXJ377 E55P 2598 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 10/2/2024 18:58 FOX FOX1645 8763 2782 Air Traffic Conflict Yes 10/4/2024 10:20 QXE QXE2005 E75L 2723 Air Traffic Conflict Yes Air Traffic Conflict 7
10/11/2024 13:32 SWA SWA3746 8738 1873 Fleet Week Yes
10/11/2024 14:22 SKW SKW4134 E75L 2421 Fleet Week Yes
10/11/2024 15:45 ASA ASA1247 8739 1692 Fleet Week Yes
10/12/2024 14:42 ASA ASA1247 8737 1922 Fleet Week Yes
10/13/2024 1219 SWA SWA2897 838M 2034 Fleet Week Yes
10/13/2024 12:59 SKW SKW4134 E75L 246~ Fleet Week Yes
10/13/2024 13:53 SWA SWA332 838M 1883 Fleet Week Yes
10/13/2024 14:22 SWA SWA1474 838M 1909 Fleet Week Yes
10/13/2024 1427 SWA SWA4152 8737 1988 Fleet Week Yes
10/11/2024 1300 SWA SWA1969 8737 2070 Fleet Week Yes
10/11/2024 12 54 SWA SWA1441 8737 2004 Fleet Week Yes
10/11/2024 12:48 SWA SWA4522 8737 1935 Fleet Week Yes
10/10/2024 17: 11 SWA SWA4020 8737 1847 Fleet Week Yes
10/10/2024 16:17 FOX FDX9183 877L 1653 Fleet Week Yes
10/10/2024 16: 11 SWA SWA1474 8738 1686 Fleet Week Yes
10/10/2024 13:22 SWA SWA3746 838M 1886 Fleet Week Yes
10/10/2024 13:00 SKW SKW4134 E75L 2493 Fleet Week Yes
10/12/2024 12 26 SWA SWA3777 838M 1935 Fleet Week Yes
Fleet Week 18
Grand Count 25
(Return to Table of Contents)
100 Degree Radial Turbojet Landing List for Calendar Quarter Date Time Flight Aircraft Airline Altitude (ft) Comment Excused Number Type 10/18/2024 7:47 SWA967 8738 SWA 2887 Excused bv reprocessinq Yes 12/30/2024 19:36 SWA353 8738 SWA 2883 Excused by reprocessinq Yes 12/25/2024 21 29 SWA346 8737 SWA 2887 Excused bv reprocessina Yes Excused bv reprocessin<1 3
12/1/2024 7:23 SWA427 838M SWA 2769 Not Acceptable No
12/31/2024 10:22 WSN95 J328 WSN 2618 Not Acceptable No
11/24/2024 18:22 SWA2026 8737 SWA 2700 Not Acceptable No 11/17/2024 7:19 SWA956 838M SWA 2749 Not Acceptable No
11/4/2024 13 :35 ASA1240 8737 ASA 2637 Not Acceptable No 10/20/2024 13:05 SWA4496 838M SWA 2851 Not Acceptable No 12/6/2024 17 :30 SWA745 8737 SWA 2683 Not Acceptable No Not Acceotable 7
Grand Count 10
(Return to Table of Contents)
Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report Page 48 of 53 Fourth Quarter 2025 North Field Jet Departure Procedure
Sample Noncompliance Contact Letter
({())) PORT OF OAKLAND
Seaport. Airport. Everyone's Port.
January 8, 2024
Aircraft Owner/Operator
xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx
Via email: aircraftowner/operator@bankofutah .com
Dear Aircraft Owner/Operator :
The jet aircraft identified below was observed departing from Runway 28L or 28R, which is an operation not in compliance with the noise abatement program at OAK. For complete information about our noise procedures see the Pilot Information sheet attached.
Event date: 1/7/2024
Time of departure : 1223 hrs. local
Aircraft Type: C525
Aircraft Tail Number or Flight Number: N417XX
The enclosed flight track map illustrates the flight identification and path of the aircraft operation.
Please use Runway 12/30 for turbojet aircraft departures .
The Port of Oakland understands that at times, safety, construction , operational necessity, or ATC instructions prevent aircraft from complying with this program . However, we urge you to help us be a good neighbor and comply with the voluntary noise abatement procedure whenever safely possible.
If circumstances warranted a non-compliant operation or you have further questions , please call me at (510) 563-3349 , or e-mail at [email protected] Sincerely,
Airport Noise Management Office
Enclosures : Flight Track Map
Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report Page 49 of 53 Fourth Quarter 2025 North Field Jet Landing Procedure
Sam~le Noncompliance Contact Letter
((I)}) PORT OF OAKLAND
Seaport. Airport. Everyone's Port.
February 9, 2024
Aircraft Owner/Operator
xxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxx
Via email: aircraftowner/ope rator@aircorp .com
Dear Aircraft Owner/Operator:
The jet aircraft identified below was observed landing on Runway 1 0L or 1 OR, which is an operation not in compliance with the noise abatement program at OAK. For complete information about our noise procedures see the Pilot Information.sheet attached.
Event date: 2/8/2024
Time of landing: 1345 hrs. local
Aircraft Type: E55P
Aircraft Tail Number or Flight Number: N11 0XX
The enclosed flight track map illustrates the flight identification and path of the aircraft operation.
Please use Runway 12 for turbojet aircraft landings when airport is in southeast flow configuration.
The Port of Oakland understands that at times, safety, construction, operational necessity, or ATC instructions prevent aircraft from complying with this program. However, we urge you to help us be a good neighbor and comply with the voluntary noise abatement procedure whenever safely possible.
If circumstances warranted a non-compliant operation or you have further questions, please call me at (510) 563-3349, or e-mail at [email protected] Sincerely,
Airport Noise Management Office
Enclosures: Flight Track Map
Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report Page 50 of 53 Fourth Quarter 2025 North Field VFR Departure Procedure
Sample Noncompliance Contact Letter
«o}) PORT OF OAKLAND
Seaport . Airport. Everyone's Port.
March 23, 2024
Aircraft Owner/Operator
xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx
Via email: aircraftowner/[email protected]
Dear Aircraft Owner/Operator :
The aircraft identified below was observed departing from Runway 28R/L or 33 and was flown over residential areas adjacent to the airport. This flight was not in compliance with the VFR departure noise abatement procedure at OAK. For complete information about our noise procedures see the Pilot Information sheet attached.
Event date: 3/22/2024
Time of departure : 1003 hrs. local
Aircraft Type: C172
Aircraft Tail Number or Flight Number: N310XX
The enclosed flight track map illustrates the flight identification and path of the aircraft operation.
Please use the noise abatement departure procedure and avoid flying over residential areas whenever safely possible. Always follow ATC instructions for safe aircraft separation.
The Port of Oakland understands that at times, safety, construction, operational necessity, or ATC instructions prevent aircraft from complying with this program. However, we urge you to help us be a good neighbor and comply with the voluntary noise abatement procedure whenever safely possible.
If circumstances warranted a non-compliant operation or you have further questions, please call me at (510) 563-3349, or e-mail at [email protected] Sincerely,
Airport Noise Management Office
Enclosures: Flight Track Map
{Return to Table of Contents)
Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report Page 51 of 53 Fourth Quarter 2025 North Field Quiet Hours Procedure
Sample Noncompliance Contact Letter
«D}) PORT OF OAKLAND
Seaport. Airport. Everyone's Port.
January 15, 2024
Aircraft Owner/Operator
xxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxx
Via email: aircraftowner/operator@aircraft .com
Dear Aircraft Owner/Operator:
The aircraft identified below was observed departing from a North Field runway and was flown over a residential area adjacent to the airport. This flight was not in compliance with the Quiet Hours noise abatement program at OAK. For complete information about our noise procedures see the Pilot Information sheet attached.
Event date: 1/14/2024
Time of departure : 2223 hrs local
Aircraft Type: PAY2
Aircraft Tail Number or Flight Number: N22XX
The enclosed flight track map illustrates the flight identification and path of the aircraft operation.
Please use the preferred runway and the noise abatement departure procedure.
The Port of Oakland understands that at times, safety, construction, operational necessity, or ATC instructions prevent aircraft from complying with this program. However, we urge you to help us be a good neighbor and comply with the voluntary noise abatement procedure whenever safely possible.
If circumstances warranted a non-compliant operation or you have further questions, please call me at (510) 563-3349, or e-mail at jrichardson@portoakland .com Sincerely,
Airport Noise Management Office
Enclosures: Flight Track Map
Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report Page 52 of 53 Fourth Quarter 2025 Helicopter Flight Procedure
Sample Noncompliance Contact Letter
«D}) PORT OF OAKLAND
Seaport. Airport. Everyone's Port.
March 7, 2024
Helicopter Owner/Operator
xxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxx
Via email: helicopterowner/[email protected]
Dear Helicopter Owner/Operator:
The Oakland Airport Noise Office is reaching out to helicopter operators to seek your continued support of the Oakland Noise Abatement Program. By avoiding certain noise sensitive areas located in close proximity to the airport, you are helping us to be a good neighbor to our local citizens.
For complete information about our noise procedures see the Pilot Information sheet attached.
In addition, the following recommendations are made for news helicopter operators :
1. Maintain appropriate altitudes.
2. Alternate hover locations whenever possible to minimize noise impacts.
3. Use the 880 corridor to help keep away from residential areas.
4. Keep noise to a minimum by use of optimum pitch and power settings for noise control.
It is understood that there may be times when your aircraft may need to fly over a residential area for safety reasons or to comply with air traffic control, but we ask that all pilots familiarize themselves with our noise sensitive areas and avoid those areas whenever possible.
With your assistance and cooperation, we trust that all efforts are being done to reduce aviation noise and be a good neighbor to our surrounding communities.
If you have further questions, please call (510) 563-3349, or e-mail [email protected] Sincerely,
Airport Noise Management Office
Enclosures: Flight Track Map
(Return to Table of Contents)
Quarterly Aircraft Noise Report Page 53 of 53 Fourth Quarter 2025 APPENDIX2
[See Attached]
ORE POLlCY DIRECTIVE
October I , 20 11
Subject:
Date:
Number:
PURPOSE
OAKLAND INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
OPERATIONS DIRECTIVE
A~-craft Engine Maintenance Run-ups/Ground Run-up Enclosure Use Policy Rev: October 1, 2011
616.5 (Supercedes all pt·eviously dated versions of this directive)
1. The goal of this policy is to minimize noise impacts upon communities in the vicinity of the airport and to accommodate aircraft operators requiring engine run-ups.
2. It is the intent of Oakland International Airport to utilize the Ground Run-up Enclosure (ORE) to mitigate noise impacts to surrounding communities. Toward that end, Airside Operations staff will require the use of the ORE for certain types of engine run-ups. Refusal to use the ORE for any reason when required or requested may result in a denial of permission to conduct the intended run~up. Use of the ORE must conform to al\ ·aspects of the procedures set forth in this directive.
DEFINITIONS
1. Aircraft Engine Maintenance Run-ups: operation of airc1-aft engines for the purpose of a.~sessing engine performance before, during, and after maintenance and/or repairs. Operations NOT INCLUDED as aircraft engine maintenance run-ups are those performed for "warming ut' and routine engine'and instrument checks ("pre-flight,, run-ups) prior to take-off for all aircraft types.
2. Revenue Flight: a commercial airline flight or .any other flight, which generates revenue for the aircraft operator.
(,
3. Emergency Flight: aircraft serving in an emergency capacity, including but not limited to police, frre, search and rescue, "life-flight'~ operations, air ambulance, aerial tankers, or transport of emergency supplies and/m• personnel.
4. Special Flight: aircraft in the service of federal, state and local law enforcement, military, or a mission pertinent to national security.
• 5. Non-Compliant Run-Up: Any Aircraft Engine Maintenance Run-up that does not comply with the provisions contained in this Directive, or that exceeds the noise limits contained in the 1976 Settlement Agreement, Section 6, SubsectionD (see details on page 4 of this Directive.
GRE POLICY DIRECTIVE
October 1, 20 I 1
POLICY
1. Aircraft operators must get authorization from Airside Operations prior to conducting any aircraft engine maintenance run-ups, excluding idle power nm-ups. Contact Airside Operations at (510) 563--3361.
2. North Field Aircraft: All engine maintenance run-ups above idle power must be perfonned at either the GRE or North Field/Hangar 6 Blast Fence unless authorized by the MOD as described in the following section. Turbojet aircraft weighing above 75,000 pounds must use the GRE at all times, and between 2200 and 0700 hrs local time, engine maintenance run-ups above idle power must be performed at the GRE for all turbojet aircraft, all military/military surplus aircraft, and aircraft in excess of 12,500 pounds.
3. South Field Aircraft: All engine maintenance run-ups above idle power for aircraft in excess of 12,500, all turbojet aircraft, and all military/military surplus airctaft normally operating at the South F~eld complex must be performed at the GRE at all times.
4. The Ground Run-up Enclosure (GRE) is n01mally available 24/7, year-round.
5. The time limit for engine maintenance run-ups is 90 minutes maximum if another aircrnft operator(s) requests the use of the GRE. Conflicts in scheduling of rnn-ups will be settled by Airside Operations.
6. If the GRE is required for deicing operations,. access to the GRE may be delayed. Alternate run-up locations may be authorized for use during deicing operations as necessary.
7. The airport reserves the right to revise this policy at any time.
8. Additional procedures apply for aircraft operators who are under special watch condition. See Airside Operations Administrative Procedures Sect. 7.
ALTERNATE AIRCRAFT ENGINE RUN-UP LOCATIONS
Approved alternate aircraft engine maintenance run-ups locations when the GRE is not available or approved by Airside Operations;
1. North Field/Hangar 6 Blast Fence.
2. Runway 29 aircraft run-up area.
3. Unusual operational circumstances may require Airside Operations to authorize run-ups in other safe and appropriately paved areas on the airport with Operations Superintendent or Manager authorization (i.e. Taxiway W west of Taxiway Y).
4. The Outdoor Test Stand (Test Cell Number 2) located at the North Airport. This area is restricted to daytime operations only, with no runs between 2200 and 0700 local time.
GRE POLlCY DIRECTIVE
October I, 2011
GENERAL PROCEDURES
1. Aircraft operators performing approved idle power engine runs within the South Terminal ramp complex must ensure that appropriate safety measures are tutde1taken throughout the duration of the idle run. These measures include. but are not be limited to. spotter personnel to alert vehicular and pedestda11 traffic to remain clear of intakes, tailpipes, propellers ru1djet blast.
2. Aircraft operators will contact the FAA control tower and advise the controller of their intentions to perform a run-up, and also verify that they have approval granted by Airside Operations, prior to starting the run-up opemtion at the assigned location. The aircraft operator will monitor the appropriate ground control frequency during the rnn-up, and comply with instructions and safety advisories issued by the controller.
3. Aircraft operators will ensure that any operators of grotmd service vehicles accompanying an aircraft to a run-up location that. is only accessible via a movement area have valid movement area driver endorsements and maintain direct radio contact . with the FAA. control tower.
Aircraft under tow may have vehicles that are not in radio contact when being used as wing walkers. In the case of a non-radio equipped vehicle performing wing walker functions, it must remain with the aircraft during the entire time spent on active movement .areas and under .control of the tug operator. All vehicles associated with the 11.m-up operation must obey instructions provided by Air Traffic Control Towel' staff~ as well as airpo1t rules and regulations ..
4. Aircraft mechanics issued OAK "Visitor" SIDA badges~ must be escorted to run-up locations tha.t are only accessible via a 01ovement c1.i'ea. They may access run-up locations accessible via non-movement areas (e.g. ORB or North Field/Hangar 6 Blast Fence) without escorts, in accordance with non~movement area dtiving regulations (e.g use ofVSRs). 5, Aircraft operators will notify Airside Operations when a pre-approved run-up will be delayed by more than 30 minutes, or when the run-up is canceled. NOTE: Lapses of time more than 45 111.inutes between shut-downs and re-:starts of the engines being run-up will require an additional approval from Airside pperations. '
6. Aircraft Operators will notify Airside Operations when the run-up has been completed ahd provide actual start and end times, and other information ifnecessaty.
AIRSIDE OPERATIONS ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES
1. Airside Operations personnel will receive and log all requests for aircraft engine maintenance run-ups in the MOD Daily Log, including the attachment of a completed Aircraft Engine Maintenance Run .. up Information Form. Personnel will submit forms in accordance with established procedures.
2. Airside Operations personnel wHI provide information about the Airport's policy on aircraft engine maintenance run-ups to the caller as necessary.
GRE POLICY DIRECTIVE
October l, 2011
3. The Airside Operations Manager-on-Duty (MOD) must approve or deny requests for l'un-ups and assign/approve locations for run-ups in accordance with this Directive. The MOD is responsible for ensuring that an MOD Daily Log entry is completed and the Aircraft Engine Maintenance Run-,up Information Form is completely filled out and submitted fol' all run-ups as requil'ed by this Directive.
4. The Airside Operations MOD and/or Coordinator will notify Airport 11/12/31 with infotmation about the l'Ull-Up and ensure that the run-up is verified and properly logged.
5. For all All engine maintenance run-ups above idle power, Airside Operations personnel must respond to the run-up location, observe and report the run-up, check that propel' safety precautions m·e in place, and note when the run-up has ended. The MOD has discretion to cancel/modify this requirement if staffing/workload conditions do not allow a response. A brief summary of the circumstances preventing a response shall be included on the run.:.up f01m.
6. Airside Operations personnel will immediately report non-approved and/or unsafe run"'ups and take appropriate action as directed by the MOD.
7. Special. Watch Procedure: The following procedures may he applied to specific aircraft operators in the event that the aircraft operator or airline creates more than one non-compliant aircraft engine run-up noise event within a single calendar year. This procedure will be applied following the second non-compliant noise event within the calendal' yeal'. The operatol' will be warned upon the first non-c;ompliant noise event.
a) Aircraft engine maintenance run-ups above idle will be restdcted between 2200 hours local time and 0700 hours local time, Monday through Saturday and all day (24 hours) during Sundays and holidays.
b) Aircraft engine maintenance run-ups may be pe1formed during the restricted hours if the aircraft is scl,eduled to operate a revenue flight, emergency flight or special ±light during those nighttime restriction hours or by 1200 hours local time following the nighttime restriction period.
c) The operator must provide flight infotmation documentation (including fl1ght number and no1mal scheduled depm1tJre time) when engine run-up authorization is requested. d) Port staff 11l.ust ensure that the scheduled depal'ture time meets the stipulations pr<:>Vided above and that the flight info1mation is noted on the Aircraft Engine Maintenance Run-up Form for any aircraft engine maintenance run-ups performed dudng the restricted periods. e) If all requirements itemized above are met, the run-up must be performed in the ORE,
INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF GRE
1. Responsible Parties - The Port of Oakland Airport Facilities Maintenance Department is responsible for the inspection and maintenance of the ORE and will coordinate all scheduled and nonscheduled maintenance requirements for this facility. The Aircraft owner/operator • assumes all liability with respect to damages to the ORE or surrounding facilities, or injuries to personnel caused by any portion of the run-up operation. Damages caused to the GRE must be immediately reported to Airside Operations by calling (510) 563-3361.
Page4 of 15
GRE POLICY DIRECTIVE
October I, 201 I
2. Daily /11spectio11s - Airside Operations shall make daily inspections of the ORE facility, looking for housekeeping and obvious maintenance issues. Maintenance and cleanup issues identified, which affect operation of the ORE shall be promptly reported to A/P Facilities for correction via an Airport Facilities Work Order.
NOTE: Airport Management may disapprove, cancel or terminate any aircraft engine maintenance run-up for any reason without prior notice.
Reference Infonnation:
1976 Settlement Agreement, Section 6, Subsection D
6.D "Port shall prohibit aircraft engine test run-ups between the hours of 1900 and 0700 except where the level of noise generated by such testing at the nearest present (as of July 2 I, 1976) residential property on Bay Farm Island does not exceed 75dBA between the hours of 1900 and 2200 and 70dBA between the hours of2200 and 0700 the following day."
Airside Operations Manager
Oakland International Airp01i
Attachments:
Attachment A- ORE Use Procedures
Attachment B -Aircraft Engine Maintenance Run-up Information F01m Attachment C - Aerodynamic Usability Windrose Low Bypass Aircraft Attachment D - Aerodynamic Usability Windrose Medium Bypass Aircraft Attachment E - Aerodynamic Usability Windrose High Bypass Aircraft Attachment F-Aerodynamic Usability Windrose B777 Aircraft Attachment 0- Aerodynamic Usability Windrose Turboprop Aircraft Attachment H - ORE Operations Policy Summary Sheet
Distribution:
Director of Aviation
Assistant Director of Aviation
Airside Operations Superintendents
Airside Operations Supervisors
Airside Operations Specialists
Noise Abatement Office
FAA Control Tower (2)
Senior Airp01t Properties Representative
Facilities Manager
GRE POLICY DIRECTrVE
October 1,2011
APPENDIX A.
Description of the GRE facility and general use considerations
1. Location a11d Access - The GRE is located ne~ the intersection of Taxiways Bravo and Tango, South of the ARFF Building. Aircraft will access the GRE from the adjacent Taxiway Bravo, to the North West of the ORE. Vehicles will access the GRE via the access road through Bravo Gate. Vehicles should park on the paved al'ea Southeast of the GRE.
2. Pllysical Dime11sions - The GRE is a three-sided, open structure. Aircraft will face the open end at a heading of 290°. Exterior dimensions are 300' wide by 3321 deep. The clear interior opening is 2601-611 wide. One window 31-211 x 6'-0" is provided in the North-East side of the GRE near the front of the stmcture to view aircraft operating within the GRE. •
3. Paveme11t Mal'kings .. Centerline: A 611 wide, yellow line is located in the center of the facility.
It is critical that the centerline of aircraft utilizing the GRE be parallel with the centerline of the facility. Nose wheel distance marks are provided for most wide body aircraft expected to utilize the facility. Tail Position: A snipe across the facility located 35' ahead of the jet blast deflector is provided, This stripe extends 10' up the s.ide-walls of the facility and is labeled ''No Tail Closer." Engine Position: A stripe across the facility~ located 60' ahead of the jet blast deflector is provided. This stripe extends 10' up the side-walls of the facility and is labeled 11No Nozzle Closer." Turn around Centerlines: Offset cente11ines on each side of the facility centerline are p1·ovided to guide power-in aircraft.
4. Utility Builtlings - Location: On the North-East side of the GRE. Size: 16' wide by 18' deep.
Approximately 50 percent of the building is allocated for GM control equipment. The remaining 50 percent is allocated for l"estrooms. Access: The control area of the building may be accessed by a 31 by 7' personnel doot on the North wall and one 6' x 71 double door on the south wall.
5, Electrical Systems, Llgl,ting, a11d lVavaitls 1- Low-level security lighting is provided within the GRE. The tights are on a photocell and will remain on after dark. Operational lighting is provided within the GRE, and must be activated by ground crew staff. These lights are ·also on a photocell to prevent their use during daylight hours. Obstruction Lights:·Nine red obstruction lights are provided along the top of the GRE structw·e and are continuously lit. Exit Lights: Exit :ijghts are provided over each egress door ih the GRE and are also continuously lit.
Grou11ding~ A continuous ground is provided for steel. GRE structures inaluding the jet blast deflector. Windsock: A lighted windsock is mounted 011 the Northwest side of the structure near the front of the GRE. Noise Monitoring System: A noise monitor is located at the rear of the facility behind the blast deflector. This monitor is connected to the noise office monitoring system and will log the noise levels and times of all run-ups within the GRE. CCTV Camera System: A closed circuit monitor will allow Airside Opetations to determine when the GRE is in use,
6. Aircraft size limitations~ Power-in, Power-out operations: All aircraft with wingspans up to 125 feet may power into the facility using no more than breakaway thrust. They should follow one of the offset centerlines for turn-around aircraft. Tug in. Power-out operations: Any aircraft
ORE POLICY DIRECTIVE
October 1, 2011
with a wingspan of less than 214 feet may use the facility. Aircraft with wingspans of greater than 125 feet will be backed into the facility with a tug. The provided nose wheel markings should be used. Aircraft may exit the facility using minimum power.
7. Aircraft Position - Aircraft shall be positioned facing straight out of the facility (parallel to the GRE centerline) .. Operation of aircraft at any angle other than parallel to the GRE centerline is prohibited. Tum-around Aircraft: Aircraft may enter from either the right or left side of the facility. They shall follow the tum-around centerlines on the pavement. When the nose wheel is inside the turn box, a minimum radius turn shall be fully completed so that the airctaft is facing out of the facility and is parallel to the GRE centerline before conducting high-power run-ups. Tow-in Procedures: All aircraft with wingspans in excess of 125 feet must be towed into the GRE. The aircraft will be towed (pushed backwards) into the GRE and centered on the • painted centerline. When exiting the GRE facility, the aircraft must contact F AA-ATCT prior to entering the Taxiway Bravo movement area. All aircraft are permitted to power out of the GRE facility upon completion of the engine run-up testing procedure using minimum power.
The aircraft shall be positioned so that no portion of the aircraft extends aft past the 11No Tail" line (located 35' ahead of the jet blast deflector). Also, the discharge nozzle of any engine which will be operated dming the test must be forward of the "No Engine11 line (located 60' ahead of thejet blast deflector). Aircraft shall be positioned as far as is practical into the GRE.
Aircraft with designated nose wheel markings must be correctly aligned on the appropriate wheel mark:
8. Wing Walkers - Airlines shall, at their discretion, use wing walkers when positioning aircraft within the GRE to prevent damage and to assure the aircraft is c011·ectly positioned within the GRE. It is recommended that two wing walkers (one on each side)be present during the tow in/tow-out or power-in/power-out operations when using the GRE. The wing walkers will give visual direction to the pilot, mechanic, or tow-tractor operator until the· aircraft has cleared the operational limits of the GRE. The use of wing walkers is at the discretion of the individual airlines.
9. Aerodynamic Considemtions - Prior to aircraft operation within the GRE, the operators shall determine the usability of the GRE based on the aircraft windrose (see Attachment "A" to this manual). Operators shall lookup the wind.rose for the test aircraft and compare the wind reported on the current A TIS to deterrnine if a successful test is likely. Operators shall monitor the windsock during testing to ensure the wind speed/direction does not become unfavorable while the test is underway. The operator shall consider wind gusts and changes of direction which would prevent successful testing in conditions which would otherwise be satisfactory.
The operator shall closely monitor engine-operating parameters and discontinue the test if parameters exceed engine manufacturer's limits or if variances in patameters indicate unsteady engine operation.
10. FOD Inspection - Upon anival at the GRE, but prior to taxiing or pushing in, conduct a visual inspection of the facility to ensure that nothing has been left in the enclosure that will interfere with turn around or the engine run-up. Also inspect the GRE for damage or other hazards.
Report any damage or other problems immediately to Airside Operations. Do not continue to use the facility until Airside Operations has given consent.
ORE POLICY DIRECTIVE
October t, 2011
GRE emergency considerations
I. Fire Extinguisl,ing Agents - Two fire extinguishers are on-site to handle minor fu·es when conducting engine groitnd rw1-up operations.
2. Communication with Flre Station - FAA ATCT may be contacted by l'adio to initiate contact with the Fire Department.
3. First~ai<l Kit - A first-aid kit and eyewash are located in the facility for providing immediate care for minor injuries. Notify airside operations to rep01t injuries and/or obtain, emergency medical assistance.
4. Plume - A telephone is located on the outside North wall of the GRE. Emergency contact. numbers are listed.
ORE POLICY DrRECTJVE
October I , 20 I l
~
APPENDIX B.
Oa kland International Airport
,., A division of the Port of Oakland
AIRCRAFT ENGINE MAINTENANCE RUN-UP INFORMATION
REQUEST DATE:
I I\ I 1~1==11 REQUESTTIME: HRS. LOCAL
I 11 1 I 11 11 J I Hawaiian Alaska Southw est Allegiant United FedEx CARRIER or
OPERATOR
81 II 11 Kaiser 11 OTHER: JetBlue US Airways
CALLER NAME
I II PHONE II II REG.# N
11 If II 11 ' I OTHeR I
8737 A320 8727 8767 G4
MAKE/:,1L .f F.I AIRCR FT
I 11 11 11 11
MD80 8757 OC10 MD11 CRJ I
NUMBER OF ENGINES TO BE TESTED
I m 0 GJ Q
ENGINE RUN-UP
I
IDLE (UP TO 30%) I I
MID (30-70%) I I
HIGH (70-100%) PQWER SETTING
I
I
I
I
LOCATION OF I
GRE 11 STADIUM# 11 GATE# 18~1
UPS/TANGO
I
ENGINE RUN-UP
I I OTHER:
I I
Hangar6 Blast Fence
PROPOSED START OF ENGINE RUN-UP TIME: HRS. LOCAL
PROPOSED END OF ENGINE RUN-UP TIME: HRS'. LOCAL
REVENUE FLIGHT INFORMA 11ON - ..... ~ ~
' Flight No. Dale Departure Time Used Only Wien Operator Is Under Special Walch (see GRE Polley Pg. 4)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
I REPORT TAKEN BY
II II A/P 10 APPROVAL
II :,,11 Jll r Jame
I ACTUAL START TIME
II II ACTUAL END TIME
II
ENGINE RUN FORM 2011-Od
j
I
I
I
I
I
ORE POLICY DIRECTIVE
October I, 20 11
APPENDIXC.
Oakland, California GRE
AIC
Nose
Aerodynamic Usability Windrose
Aircraft: Low Bypass
(B727, B737-200, etc.)
0 10
■High-Power Runs Possible
80 90
■High-Power Runs May be Possible (Dependent on Wind Stability & Engine Power Setting) High-Power Runs Unlikely
GRE POLlCY DIRECTIVE
October I, 2011
AIC
Nose
APPENDIXD.
Oakland, California GRE
Aerodynamic Usability Windrose
Aircraft: Medium Bypass
(A319, A320, A321, B737-300+, B747-200, DC-10, etc.)
0 10
■High-Power Runs Possible
80 90
■High-Power Runs May be Possible (Dependent on Wind Stability & Engine Power Setting) High-Power Runs Unlikely
GRE POLICY DIRECTIVE
October I, 20 I I
APPENDIXE.
Oakland, California GRE
AIC
Nme
:t
I
• I
I
II
I
~ I
I
Aerodynamic Usability Windrose
Aircraft: High Bypass
(B747-300+, B757, B767, MD-11, etc.)
0 10 I q
• ' I I
I q
I
~
)l:1 • . ..._:,.
i)--~-._
'-\,
':!.
•
I ~ I
I I
II •• . , a I
■High-Power Runs Possible
.,
-f~
';\ ,.,
<:
,
._\;
I
I
80 90
II
I
■High-Power Runs May be Possible (Dependent on Wind Stability & Engine Power Setting) High-Power Runs Unlikely
GRE POLICY DIRECTIVE
October I, 20 I I
APPENDIXF.
Oakland, California G RE
AIC
Nose
Aerodynamic Usability Windrose
Aircraft: B777
0 10
■High-Power Runs Possible
80 90
■High-Power Runs May be Possible (Dependent on Wind Stability & Engine Power Setting) High-Power Runs Unlikely
GRE POLICY DIRECTIVE
October I, 20 11
APPENDIXG.
Oakland, California GRE
Aerodynamic Usability Windrose
Aircraft: Turboprop
A/C
Nose
■High-Power Runs Possible
0 10
80 90
100
■High-Power Runs May be Possible (Dependent on Wind Stability & Engine Power Setting) High-Power Runs Unlikely
GRE POLICY DrRECTIVE
October I, 2011
APPENDIXH.
Oaklandlnternational Airport
:· A':a1v1~Jijiidrii~,.fe&r.to¥~~R1ana1
Engine Maintenance Run-up Operations
Obtain authorization from Alrsrde Operations prior to conducting any aircraft engine maintenance run-ups, exdtidlng Idle power run-ups.
Contact Airside Operations at (510} 563•3361.
Daytime (0700 hrs. to 2200 hrs. local)
North Field Aircraft: All engine maintenance run-ups above Idle power must be performed at either the GRE or North Field/Hangar 6 Blast Fence unless an alternate locat(on ts authorrzed bythe MOD.
Turbojet a·ircraftwetghlng above 75,000 pounds must use the GRE. south Field Aircraft: All engine maintenance run-ups above Idle powe.r for aircraft In excess of 12,500, all tt1rbojet aircraft, and all mriltary/mllitary ·surplus aircraft normally operating at the South Field complex must be performed at the GRE.
Nighttime (2~00 hrs. to 0700 hrs. local)
Between. 2200 and 0700 hrs local time; all engine maintenance run~ups above idle power must be performed qt tht! GRE for aircraft In excess of 12;500 pounds, all turbojet aircraft, and all mllltary/mllitary surplus aircraft.
The Ground Run-up Enclosure (GRE) is normally available 24/7, year-round.
The time limit for engine maintenance runMups is 90 minutes maximum if another .aircraft operator(s) requests the use of the GRE.
APPENDIX3
[See Attached]
Oakland lnternational Airport
A division of the Port of Oakland
1..:s==----=~-
AIRCRAFT ENGINE MAINTENANCE RUN-UP INFORMATION
I REQUEST DATE: 11 M ILiDI REQUESTTIME: HRS. LOCAL
CARRIER or
I Alaska I I Southwest I I Allegiant 11 Delta I I FedEx I I Hawaiian
OPERATOR
EJ I spirit 11 Contour I I Kaiser I I OTHER:
I CALLER NAME 11 II PHONE II II REG.# N ___ _
I A320 I I I 8767 11 G-4 I I OrnER MAKE/MODEL OF
1 8737 I 18727
AIRCRAFT
I MD80 I I 8757 I I DC10 I I MD11 11 CRJ I
I NUMBER OF ENGINES TO BE TESTED
II EJ EJ EJ EJ
ENGINE RUN-UP
I
IDLE (UP TO 30%)
I I
MID (30-70%)
I I
HIGH (70-100%)
POWER SETTING
LOCATION OF I GRE 11 STADIUM# I I GATE# I ~~ I UPS/TANGO
ENGINE RUN-UP
I Hangar 6 Blast Fence I I OTHER:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I PROPOSED ST ART OF ENGINE RUN-UP TIME: HRS. LOCAL I
I PROPOSED END OF ENGINE RUN-UP TIME: HRS. LOCAL I
REVENUE FLIGHT INFORMATION
,-.,,,,......, _ ............... .........,, .~
l
Flight No. Date Departure Time Used Only When Operator is Under Special Watch (see GRE Policy Pg. 4) ..._
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
I REPORT TAKEN BY 11 11 A/P 10 APPROVAL 11
::=I A=C=T=U=A=L=S=T=A=RT= Tl=M=E==:::::1::=1 =========:11 ACTUAL END TIME l::=I ==========:
MOD Name
ENGINE RUN FORM 2020-Nov
APPENDIX4
[See Attached]
OAKLAND AIRPORT
NOTICE TO ALL AIRPORT LESSEES
The City of Oakh:md, a municipal corporation, acting by and through its Board of Port Commissioners ("Port of Oakland"), the City of Alameda, the Citizens League for Airport Safety and Serenity (CLASS) and the Berkeley Keep Jets over the Bay Committee (KJOB) reached an agreement on November 14, 2001, which partially resolves the controversial issues surrounding expansion of the Oakland Airport ("OAK"). Under that agreement, the Port shall provide a copy of existing voluntary noise abatement procedures to all parties who have lease agreements with the Port at OAK.
The Port urges all Lessees to use their good faith, best efforts to comply with these important voluntary noise abatement procedures whenever practicable and to encourage any itinerant users of their facility also to comply with the procedures. To acknowledge receipt of this notification, the Port requests that you sign and return the attached Acknowledgment to the Noise/Environmental Compliance Office. Port of Oakland has a high priority to take all reasonable and practicable steps, within the confines of safety, applicable laws and regulations, to minimize airport noise impacts that may affect our neighbors.
Listed below are the noise abatement procedures which the Port encourages you to follow, safety permitting, to the fullest extent possible.
1. North Field Preferential Runway Use Program (24 hour/day program) The North Field Preferential Runway Use noise abatement procedure states that the aircraft listed below should not depart at any time of the day from Runways 28R/L or land on Runways 1 0R/L, except during emergencies, when Runway 12/30 is not available closed for construction, maintenance, repairs, or by any cause beyond the control of the Port. Pilots are requested to use Runway 12/30 whenever possible.
• Turbo-jet and turbo-fan powered aircraft.
• Turbo-prop aircraft over 17,000 pounds.
• Four-engine reciprocating powered aircraft.
• Surplus military aircraft over 12,500 pounds.
Regularly scheduled passenger and cargo airlines or regional jet commercial passenger aircraft operations shall not land on Runways 28L/R, except during emergencies, when Runway 12/30 is not available closed for construction, maintenance, repairs, or by any cause beyond the control of the Port.
2. North Field Quiet Hours Program (10 p.m. to 7 a.m.)
The Quiet Hours procedures provide recommendations to pilots using the North Field and is intended to minimize noise from 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. for residents living near OAK. To achieve this goal, a variety of noise abatement departure and arrival procedures and recommendations, to be utilized when safety, weather, and ATC instructions permit, have been developed for the North Field. These are:
(a) Encouraging pilots affixed and rotary wing aircraft to avoid, as much as possible, flying over hotels and residential areas.
NOTICE TO ALL AIRPORT LESSEES
Rev. March 2025
(b) Runway 28L is the preferred landing runway.
( c) Runways 1 OR and 28R are the preferred departure runways. (d) No left turn departures from Runways 10 UR.
(e) No straight out departures from Runway 1 0L.
(f) All aircraft over75,000 pounds are directed to use Runways 12/30. (g) Use only full runway-length departures from the chosen North Field runway.
3. Engine Run-up Policy
All engine testing above idle power run-ups should be performed in the Ground Run-up Enclosure (GRE) safety permitting and whenever available. Airport Operations Directive 616.5 provides the following criteria for engine run-ups:
(a) No aircraft engine shall be started, warmed..:up, or run-up except in areas designated by the Airport Manager.
(b) No aircraft engines shall be run-up between the hours of 7:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. (local time) without special permission from the Airport Manager.
(c) Night-time engine run-ups must not exceed the following noise levels atthe closest residential property on Bay Farm Island: 75 decibels between the hours of 7:00 p.m. and 10:00 p.m. and 70 decibels between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. the following day.
4. North Field VFR Flights
Noise abatement procedures for North Field VFR (Visual Flight Rules) aircraft departures from Runways 28R/L or 33 instruct pilots, safety permitting, to make a right crosswind turn over San Leandro Bay untn reaching 1-880 (Nimitz Freeway) and continue per FAA air traffic control instructions. Whenever safely possible, pilots are requested to avoid flying over nearby residential areas. A noncompliant departure is defined as a VFR departure from Runways 28R/L or 33 that flies over Alameda residential areas when it would have been safe to follow the VFR noise abatement procedure.
5. SILENT SID (10:00 pm to 7:00 am)
The SILENT departure is an FAA conventional instrument departure procedure at OAK, designed to reduce noise from turbojet and turbofan aircraft departures between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m.
The SILENT departure procedure is described as a turbojet aircraft take-off from Runway 30 that turns left on a heading of 270 degrees to intercept and proceed via the SFO R-342 (the San Francisco VOR 1 342 degree radial). •
Note that a 10-minute buffer (10:00 p.m. to 1 0: 1 0 p.m. and 6:50 a.m. and 7:00 a.m) is applied to this procedure as aircraft anticipated to depart shortly before 10:00 p.m. or shortly after 7:00 a.m. might depart a few minutes before or after their expected departure time due to taxi time or unexpected delays. Buffer-time departures are noted in quarterly reports but are not considered non-compliant. •
NOTICE TO ALL AIRPORT LESSEES.
Rev. March 2025
2 6. HUSSH SID (10:00 pm to 7:00 am)
The HUSSH departure procedure is an FAA Area Navigation (RNAV) instrument departure procedure at OAK, designed to generally mimic the initial heading and noise reduction benefit of the SILENT departure. This departure procedure, using satellite-based navigation technologies, is assigned between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. and requires departing aircraft to turn left towards the HUSSH waypoint, located near the middle of the Bay, before proceeding northbound up the middle of the Bay towards the NIITE waypoint.
7. SUNNE Departure Procedure
The SUN NE departure procedure is a conventional departure used at nighttime that turns aircraft roughly 180 degrees to the left after departure, away from Alameda. Use of this procedure is limited due to conflicts with SFO arrivals but may be used when practicable.
Note that a 10-minute buffer (10:00 p.m. to 10: 1 O p.m. and 6:50 a.m. and 7:00 a.m.) is applied to this procedure as aircraft anticipated to depart shortly before 10:00 p.m. or shortly after 7:00 a.m. might depart a few minutes before or after their expected departure time due to taxi time or unexpected delays. Buffer-time departures are noted in quarterly reports but are not considered non-conforming.
8. OAKLAND Departure Procedure (7:00 am to 10:00 pm)
To reduce noise to areas near the departure end of Runway 30, OAK has collaborated with FAA to shift the initial heading of the OAKLAND departure procedure from 296 degrees to 290 degrees.
This procedure, which is assigned to certain aircraft during the day (7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.), requires pilots to make a six-degree left turn after departing OAK and reaching a safe altitude.
Specific headings on this procedure may change from time to time due to magnetic shift or operational reasons.
9. Aircraft departing from Runway 30
Aircraft departing from Runway 30 should not make right turn climb-outs over Bay Farm Island.
10. Landing Airplanes (24-hour program)
(a) On landings, avoid flying over residential areas as much as possible. (b) No straight-in landings to Runway 15, unless required by wind or safety conditions.
11. Touch & Go Operations (24-hour program)
Runway 28L is the preferred touch-and-go runway; fly counter-clockwise, making a left crosswind turr:i as soon as practicable.
12. Daytime Operations (7:00 a.m. to 10:00p.m.)
Departures off Runways 28R/L:
(a) Make right crosswind turn over San Leandro Bay until reaching 1-880 (Nimitz Freeway) and continue per ATC instructions.
(b) No straight out departures.
NOTICE TO ALL AIRPORT LESSEES
Rev. March 2025
3 Departures off Runway 33:
(a) Make right northerly turn over San Leandro Bay until reaching 1-880 Freeway and continue per ATC instructions.
(b) No straight out or left crosswind/downwind departures. [Acknowledgment Continued on Next Page]
NOTICE TO ALL AIRPORT LESSEES
Rev. March 2025
4 Acknowledgment
We have received the Notice to Airport Lessees describing important noise abatement procedures for operating aircraft at the Oakland Airport.
Print Name:
Signature:
Company:
Date:
The Port of Oakland requests that you sign and return this Acknowledgment to the Airport Noise Management Office to [email protected] or Oakland Airport, One Airport Drive, Box 45, Oakland, CA 94621.
Your immediate attention to this would be greatly appreciated. Please contact the Airport Noise Abatement and Environmental Affairs Supervisor at 510-563-3349 if you have any questions.
NOTICE TO ALL AIRPORT LESSEES
Rev. March 2025
5 APPENDIX 5
[See Attached]
I ~ OAK
Welcome to Oakland Airport (OAK)!
Thank you for choosing to fly Oakland Airport (OAK)! To be a good neighbor and reduce noise for surrounding communities, OAK has developed noise abatement procedures and a preferential runway program, and we ask that pilots, safety permitting, follow these procedures whenever practicable. By following the guidelines below, polite pilots help improve quality of life for residents near OAK and help us maintain good relationships with our neighbors.
The QR code provides a link that describes our noise abatement procedures in detail, and we encourage operators to familiarize themselves with these procedures prior to departing or when landing at OAK. In summary, these procedures encourage the following:
Jet Operators ·
Avoid departing Runways 28L,
28R, and Runway 33. Instead,
choose Runway 30 for departure
during west flow .
VFR Prop/Turboprop Operators
When flying VFR, avoid overflying
the noise sensitive areas depicted
in the graphic.
Nighttime IFR Prop/Turboprop
Operators
When departing the North Field,
use the SALAD procedure when
able, making the turn as soon as
practicable after departure .
Helicopters
Fly over freeways and water to the
extent practicable
' ±\ POLITE PILOTS t $' ~ FLY ®UIET !!Y
Thank you for always choosing to
DEPART OFF OF RUNWAY 30.
Avoiding, whene~r possible, runway 28R or 28L.
In gratitude ,
OAK Noise Department staff
and your neighbors!
Taxi route
to
RUNWAY 30
II
OAK thanks you for familiariz ing yourself with noise abatement procedu res, and we hope to see you again soon!
POLITE PILOTS
~FLY®UIET;:_.,
Thank you for always choosing to
DEPART OFF OF RUNWAY 30.
Avoiding, whenever possible, runway 28R or 28L.
In gratitude,
OAK Noise Department staff
and your neighbors!
Taxi route
to
RUNWAY 30
Thank you for always choosing to
DEPART OFF OF RUNWAY 30.
Avoiding, whenever possible, runway 28R or 28L.
In gratitude,
OAK Noise Department staff
and your neighbors!
Taxi route
to
RUNWAY 30
EXHIBIT B
[See Attached]
Distances from Taxiway Bravo to Proposed Terminal
FedEx Apron
·------- Taxiway B
1---Ln
I'-
-Ln •
N
N
'°
PROPOSED TERMINAL BUILDING EDGE