Cities Index.
Correspondence - Updated 6/17

Alameda City Council
June 17, 2025

Document
Correspondence - Updated 6/17
Meeting
June 17, 2025
Body
Alameda City Council
Original file
743 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on legistar1.granicus.com. That file is the official record.

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… June 17, 2025 Mayor Marilyn Ezzy Ashcraft Vice Mayor Michele Pryor Councilmember Greg Boller Councilmember Tony Daysog Councilmember Tracy Jensen RE: Agenda Item 7-A Various Actions Related to Potential Sale of 13 Acres of Land in the Enterprise District for Pacific Fusion Research and Development Facility Dear Members of the City Council: Community Action for a Sustainable Alameda (CASA) is a community-wide coalition dedicated to raising awareness, mobilizing community action, and facilitating the implementation of the City’s Climate Action and Resiliency Plan and more generally to increase community sustainability and well-being. We are thrilled that Alameda Point has been the destination for so many green tech companies, including Pacific Fusion. We are writing to support the actions related to the potential sale of land to Pacific Fusion. § Pacific Fusion is demonstrating technology that could help reduce our reliance on fossil fuels and mitigate the impacts of climate change. If successful, Pacific Fusion could change our path towards adaptation and resilience and reduce the impacts of sea level rise. § Pacific Fusion will be an anchor facility in the Site B Enterprise District at Alameda Point and will contribute to the development of the utility and streets infrastructure. § Pacific Fusion will create 250 clean tech jobs in Alameda and will significantly contribute to Alameda’s economy. § Pacific Fusion has committed to address concerns that the public has about safety and radioactive waste. As an island city, Alameda is uniquely vulnerable to the impacts of climate change. We need to invest in those solutions and providing a long-term support to Pacific Fusion is part of that solution. Sincerely, Ruth Abbe, Steering Committee Community Action for a Sustainable Alameda

RE: June 17th AGENDA ITEM: 7-A 2025-5088
Dear Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft, Vice Mayor Pryor, and Councilmembers Boller, Daysog, and Jensen, City

Manager

Ott

and

Base

Reuse

Director

Thorne-Lyman,

We’re a group of Alameda parents with young children writing to express strong support for the City moving forward with the sale

of

property

at

Alameda

Point

to

Pacific

Fusion.

This

project

isn’t

just

about

filling

a

blank

lot—it’s

about

sparking

a

transformation

that

could

energize

our

city’s

economy

and

signal

that

Alameda

is

a

magnet

for

innovative

companies

solving

critical

problems.

Clean,

abundant

energy

is

vital

for

the

future

of

our

kids,

the

world,

and

this

Island.

A Spark for Jobs, Innovation & Development
We’ve

already

seen

Alameda

companies

like

Makani,

Saildrone,

Kairos,

Natel,

and

Rain

generate

cross-pollination

of

talent

and

ideas.

The

same

is

true

in

biotech,

with

Penumbra,

Abbott,

and

Excelxis.

Pacific

Fusion

has

the

potential

to

anchor

a

new

sector

in

clean

energy

and

advanced

R&D—bringing

hundreds

of

high-skill

jobs

for

scientists

and

engineers,

while

also

supporting

construction

and

trades

work

to

build

it.

Healthy

cities

are

a

mix

of

housing,

education,

recreation,

and

employment.

While

bold

plans

for

Alameda

Point

have

often

stalled,

this

project

stands

out

as

a

focused

first

step—with

defined

milestones

and

timelines

we

can

build

from.

This project is highly aligned with the city’s existing goals for Alameda Point, our General Plan, and our climate goals. The required infrastructure

investment

will

also

make

nearby

parcels

in

the

Enterprise

District

more

appealing

to

future

development.

A

stronger

tax

base

and

a

more

diversified

budget

will

also

be

a

boon.

As

the

City

enters

the

next

phase

of

negotiations,

we

urge

you

to

stay

firm

on

Alameda’s

long-term

goals.

With

Pacific

Fusion

weighing

Livermore

as

an

alternative

and

Hines

designing

for

flexibility,

it’s

critical

that

Alameda

secures

lasting

value.

This

site

should

strengthen

our

clean

energy

and

R&D

ecosystem—not

default

to

a

generic

commercial

use.

Public

land

must

deliver

public

benefit.

Fusion, Not Fission
We

understand

that

energy

projects

of

this

nature

can

raise

concerns.

But

this

is

not

fission.

It

uses

no

uranium

or

plutonium,

carries

no

risk

of

meltdown,

no

chain

reaction,

and

produces

no

long-lived

radioactive

waste.

Fusion

works

by

combining

atoms

at

very

high

temperatures,

and

if

those

conditions

aren’t

maintained,

the

reaction

simply

stops.

This

facility

is

not

a

power

plant—it’s

for

research

and

demonstration.

It

will

be

regulated

by

the

California

Department

of

Public

Health,

and

third-party

safety

assessments

have

shown

minimal

risk

to

the

surrounding

community,

even

under

conservative

scenarios.

The

state

also

requires

financial

guarantees

to

ensure

safe

decommissioning

when

the

time

comes.

These

protections

matter—and

should

be

kept

visible

to

the

public

as

the

project

advances.

Transparent

Progress

Pacific

Fusion

has

shown

a

welcome

commitment

to

transparency,

participating

in

public

hearings,

engaging

directly

with

residents,

and

working

closely

with

City

departments.

That

matters.

Bold

climate

action

must

be

built

on

public

trust.

The

path

to

a

clean

energy

future

should

be

lit

by

open

dialogue

and

grounded

in

local

values.

Alamedans

should

help

shape

the

direction—not

just

watch

it

unfold.

We

appreciate

Pacific

Fusion’s

community

approach

so

far,

and

urge

continued

vigilance

to

ensure

this

remains

an

ultra-safe,

transparent,

and

accountable

project

as

it

moves

forward.

The Changing Winds
As

an

island

city,

we

will

feel

the

impacts

of

climate

change

directly.

With

federal

climate

leadership

shifting

dangerously

off-course,

cities

like

ours

must

chart

our

own

future.

We

want

our

children

to

grow

up

in

a

city—and

a

nation—that

doesn’t

just

react

to

the

future,

but

helps

shape

it.

If

we

want

Alameda

Point

to

be

more

than

vacant

lots

and

unrealized

potential,

we

need

to

say

yes

to

opportunities

like

this,

ones

that

invest

in

our

land,

our

values,

and

our

people.

Let’s spark the future—right here, in Alameda.

Sincerely,

Thushan

Amarasiriwardena
,

product

manager

in

civic

tech,

parent

of

two

Kate

Stirr
,

policy

executive

in

climate

tech,

parent

of

two

Drew

Dara-Abrams
,

transportation

tech

entrepreneur,

parent

of

two

Ryan

Bird
,

clean

energy

consultant,

parent

of

two

Maria

Piper
,

technical

solutions

consultant,

parent

of

three

Sean

Noonan
,

startup

exec,

parent

of

two

Jason

Purdy
,

product

manager,

parent

of

two

Robin

Oliva-Kraft
,

product

manager,

parent

of

three

Downtown Alameda Business Association 2447 Santa Clara Ave, Suite #302 Alameda, CA 94501 Phone: (510) 523-1392 Off[email protected] 2025 Board of Directors

Ron Mooney President Tony Yu President-Elect

Sadia Kazi-Koya Past President

Steve Busse Treasurer

Sabrina Cazarez Secretary
Directors At Large

William Allen Naomi Berghoef Aaron Kraw
Committee Chairs

Shannon Marsdon Marketing Committee Outreach Committee Clean, Green & Safe Committee

Director Emeritus

Kyle Conner Donna Layburn
Staff

Kathy Weber Executive Director Allison Grant Membership & Events Alison Walker Membership & Events June 16, 2025 SUBJECT: 7-A 2025-5088 Support for Pacific Fusion Dear Honorable Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft and Members of the Alameda City Council, On behalf of the Downtown Alameda Business Association (DABA), I am writing to express our strong support for the proposed Pacific Fusion research and development facility at Alameda Point.

This project represents a transformative opportunity for our city. The billion-dollar capital investment by Pacific Fusion stands as one of the largest private investments in Alameda’s history and signals tremendous confidence in our community’s future. The facility is projected to create 250 high-quality, local jobs, along with additional work for construction and trades professionals—directly contributing to Alameda’s economic vitality.

Over the next ten years, the project is expected to generate approximately $120 million in combined sales, use, and property tax revenue—critical funding that can support essential city services and infrastructure. Importantly, the increased presence of a high-tech workforce and visiting partners is likely to result in more patronage of Alameda’s local businesses—our restaurants, retail shops, and service providers—further energizing the downtown district and the broader city economy.

Beyond direct economic impact, Pacific Fusion is breathing life into an underutilized area of Alameda Point. The project acts as a catalyst for continued redevelopment in the Enterprise District and paves the way for future investment by improving essential infrastructure. Their upgrades will not only serve the immediate site but will enhance connectivity and access for future businesses.

We are also encouraged by Pacific Fusion’s thoughtful and proactive engagement with the community. Their commitment to transparency and education—evidenced by public town halls and family-friendly events—illustrates a genuine desire to be a long-term, responsible neighbor. The facility is being designed with the highest safety standards and community considerations in mind, with no noise or vibration during operation, no continuous production activity, and minimal strain on the city’s power grid. Additionally, their approach to radiation safety and materials handling is in line with—or exceeds—the rigorous standards of federal and state regulators.

As Alameda continues to position itself as a regional hub for science, sustainability, and innovation, we believe that welcoming Pacific Fusion supports that vision. Their mission and operations align with Downtown Alameda’s values of environmental stewardship, responsible development, and inclusive economic growth.

We encourage the City Council to support this project and help realize its many long-term benefits for Alameda.

Sincerely,

Kathy Weber, Executive Director

From: Shelby S
To: Tod Hickman
Cc: City Clerk; Lara Weisiger; Tracy Jensen; Tony Daysog; Greg Boller; Michele Pryor; Marilyn Ezzy Ashcraft Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: PUBLIC COMMENT 6-17-25 Agenda 7A Pacific Fusion Date: Monday, June 16, 2025 3:16:53 PM
Dear Councilmembers and Madam Clerk,
I am writing to confirm that the recent correspondence submitted by Tod Hickman, in which I was cc'd and referenced (below), was sent with my full knowledge and authorization. I affirm that Mr. Hickman was speaking on my behalf, and I fully support the content and concerns expressed in that message.

Please include this confirmation in the official record and consider our positions as aligned in full.

Sincerely,
Shelby Sheehan
Alameda NAS Historic Preservationists
On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 2:40 PM Tod Hickman <[email protected] > wrote:

Alameda City Council,
In reference to the June 17, 2025 Agenda Item 7-A, Pacific Fusion; For the Public Record - We Object to this Project. Once again City staff are trying to illegally circumvent the CEQA process and fast track a project that in no way complies with conditions required for development at this site.

The 300-page report titled "City of Alameda Environmental Checklist For Streamlined Review", fails to adequately address the numerous issues related to CEQA, including, but not limited to;

1. This project at this location is a violation of the Regulatory Framework for Alameda Point.

2. This project is a violation of allowed uses at this location and violates the zoning code.

3. This project fails to comply with the 2014 EIR and previous governing actions for the Base, including the 1996 Base Reuse Plan.

4. This document misapplies non-existent CEQA exemptions to this location.

5. Numerous violations of Law are present throughout this document.

6. This document violates numerous government ethics and rules.

7. Numerous Violations of CEQA implementing procedures are present.

8. This document intentionally downplays the nuclear waste component of this project and fails to address the hazards of the actual NUCLEAR wastes produced.

9. There is no Responsible Agency listed for Nuclear Waste on the 2014 AP EIR so how possibly could this project be categorically exempt? Not possible.

10. Is The City Council reading these documents?
Respectfully,
Tod Hickman
and on behalf of Shelby Sheehan cc'd in this email
Alameda NAS Historic Preservationists
--
Shelby
510-435-9263
"The righteousness of the oppressed will not go unheard." From: Tod Hickman
To: City Clerk; Lara Weisiger; Tracy Jensen; Tony Daysog; Greg Boller; Michele Pryor; Marilyn Ezzy Ashcraft; Shelby S
Subject: [EXTERNAL] PUBLIC COMMENT 6-17-25 Agenda 7A Pacific Fusion Date: Monday, June 16, 2025 2:40:39 PM
Alameda City Council,
In reference to the June 17, 2025 Agenda Item 7-A, Pacific Fusion; For the Public Record - We Object to this Project. Once again City staff are trying to illegally circumvent the CEQA process and fast track a project that in no way complies with conditions required for development at this site.

The 300-page report titled "City of Alameda Environmental Checklist For Streamlined Review", fails to adequately address the numerous issues related to CEQA, including, but not limited to;

1. This project at this location is a violation of the Regulatory Framework for Alameda Point.

2. This project is a violation of allowed uses at this location and violates the zoning code.

3. This project fails to comply with the 2014 EIR and previous governing actions for the Base, including the 1996 Base Reuse Plan.

4. This document misapplies non-existent CEQA exemptions to this location.

5. Numerous violations of Law are present throughout this document.

6. This document violates numerous government ethics and rules.

7. Numerous Violations of CEQA implementing procedures are present.

8. This document intentionally downplays the nuclear waste component of this project and fails to address the hazards of the actual NUCLEAR wastes produced.

9. There is no Responsible Agency listed for Nuclear Waste on the 2014 AP EIR so how possibly could this project be categorically exempt? Not possible.

10. Is The City Council reading these documents?
Respectfully,
Tod Hickman
and on behalf of Shelby Sheehan cc'd in this email
Alameda NAS Historic Preservationists
June 13, 2025
Mayor Marilyn Ezzy Ashcraft
Members of the Alameda City Council
Re: Support for Pacific Fusion Project at Alameda Point
Dear Mayor Ashcraft and Members of the City Council,
On behalf of the West Alameda Business Association (WABA), I would like to express our support for the proposed Pacific Fusion project at Alameda Point.

As an organization dedicated to advancing economic vitality, sustainability, and community well-being in West Alameda and across the Island, we see great promise in this project. It offers a rare opportunity to bring innovative energy technology to our community while delivering substantial local benefits.

Pacific Fusion is projected to create hundreds of high-quality jobs and significant new economic activity — both of which will ripple through our small businesses and local workforce. The investment in core infrastructure at Alameda Point is equally important, helping to unlock an area of the city that holds tremendous potential for long-term growth.

Perhaps most exciting is the project’s alignment with our community’s environmental values. Advancing clean, safe energy solutions is essential to building a resilient future. Hosting a project of this caliber will further strengthen Alameda’s leadership in sustainability and innovation.

We also appreciate Pacific Fusion’s commitment to engaging with the local community and supporting educational opportunities in STEM — investments that will pay dividends for our young people and the broader region.

We hope the Council will move this project forward with an eye toward its broad potential for Alameda.

As always, WABA is ready to work alongside the City, and our partners to support opportunities that grow good jobs, foster innovation, and make our city even stronger.

Thank you for your leadership and consideration.

Sincerely,
Elissa Glickman
Executive Director
West Alameda Business Association

Pier 9, Suite 111, The Embarcadero, San Francisco, CA 94111 T. 415.291.3377 F. 415.291.3388 www.SanFranciscoBayFerry.com

June 12, 2025

Mayor Ezzy-Ashcraft and City Council
2263 Santa Clara Avenue
Alameda, CA 94501

Via email:

[email protected]

Dear Mayor Ezzy-Ashcraft and City Council:

San Francisco Bay Ferry (SF Bay Ferry) strongly supports Pacific Fusion’s proposal to develop a renewable energy and clean tech R&D facility on Site B at Alameda Point. With facilities in Livermore and Fremont, Pacific Fusion is interested in constructing a one-of-a-kind, state-of-the-art headquarters facility, which would include office, laboratory, and research and development space in which approximately 200 people would be permanently employed. The company is considering Alameda and one other East Bay location as finalists for this facility.

SF Bay Ferry, a service of the Water Emergency Transportation Authority (WETA), is a regional public transit agency tasked with operating and expanding ferry service on the San Francisco Bay and with coordinating the water transit response to regional emergencies. SF Bay Ferry carries approximately three million passengers annually utilizing a fleet of 19 high-speed passenger-only ferry vessels. SF Bay Ferry currently serves the cities of Alameda, Oakland, Richmond, San Francisco, South San Francisco, and Vallejo.

SF Bay Ferry supports increased employment opportunities within the City of Alameda, and specifically Alameda Point, as more jobs located in the City of Alameda means more potential ferry passengers to and from SF Bay Ferry’s three ferry terminals in Alameda. We appreciate the City of Alameda’s careful consideration of creating a vibrant, mixed-use development that supports thousands of jobs, attracts visitors, creating a thriving community with ferry service as the main form of public transportation.

The East Bay region is home to a dynamic and thriving innovation ecosystem. The region’s manufacturing legacy and leadership in multiple technologies create a unique synergy that promotes cross-disciplinary innovation, with growing R&D investments in biosciences, climatetech, semiconductors, food and beverage, and transportation. The diversity of these economic activities keeps the region thriving and growing.

Pacific Fusion’s expanded presence in the East Bay will create and increase green job opportunities in various sectors, including engineering, science, manufacturing, and research and development. The addition of Pacific Fusion to the Alameda Point community furthers the dynamic ecosystem at the Point as their goals complement the region’s climate action and resiliency efforts while bolstering economic development.

We encourage the City of Alameda to explore creating a catalytic investment with Pacific Fusion at Alameda Point.

Sincerely,

Seamus Murphy
Executive Director

From: Jeffrey Gould
To: City Clerk
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Item 7A, June 17 .. Why I"m opposed to Pacific Fusion at Alameda Point Date: Thursday, June 5, 2025 11:52:20 PM
Hello Ms Mayor, City Council members,
I hope you will read this important article on fusion reactors from the 'Bulletin of Atomic Scientists' - one of the most respected sources for information on nuclear issues:
https://thebulletin.org/2017/04/fusion-reactors-not-what-theyre-cracked-up-to-be/ While this Pacific Fusion project is being touted as clean energy, a source of revenue, jobs etc .. It's inappropriate due to the many undisclosed risks to our community, our security and our local environment. It represents too high a risk for our island and the surrounding area. These issues need to be addressed in public discussion not fast-tracked as is evident in the hastily prepared and wholy inadequate (CEQA) material within this agenda item.
-- Using our limited land resources that should be going to local clean energy research and production for this project -- a money laundering scheme masquerading as a high order tech promise with many instances of cost overruns, leaks, unattainable goals already behind it is not something we as a city should condone or be a host for.

Thank You,
- former AMP PUB commissioner Jeffrey Gould

← All documents from this meeting