Cities Index.
Correspondence - Updated 12/2

Alameda City Council
November 18, 2025

Document
Correspondence - Updated 12/2
Meeting
November 18, 2025
Body
Alameda City Council
Original file
3.8 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on legistar1.granicus.com. That file is the official record.

From: Mitch B
To: CITYCOUNCIL-List
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Written comment for item 7D of 12/2/25 City Council Meeting Date: Tuesday, December 2, 2025 10:16:06 AM
Hello,
I will be making a public comment on item 7D for the 12/2/25 City Council Meeting and wanted to share a written copy with linked citations.

Last week I received an instagram ad from an account called the “Coalition for Responsible Celebration” urging me to “Take Action!” because Alameda is considering a “balloon sales ban” and “local businesses need my help!”. I found this a little funny as this isn’t a balloon sales ban, it’s a mylar balloon sales ban, and you would think that an organization supporting responsible celebration would be supportive of choosing one of the thousands of other ways to celebrate that don’t include single-use disposable plastic in a form that is particularly dangerous to wildlife, can easily be transported into inaccessible wilderness, and wastes helium, a non-renewable resource required for medical equipment. So I decided to investigate further.

The “Coalition for Responsible Celebration” claims their mission is to “position balloons and celebration products as special and affordable ways to celebrate by promoting safe environmental product practices, driving sustainable solutions with responsible product stewardship” (https://www.coalitionforresponsiblecelebration.org/about ). And while they do
technically advocate for tying down balloons and properly disposing them after use, the majority of their online presence is instead focused on promoting balloons and targeted advertising against municipalities banning or restricting balloon use. This targeted advertising is not just something they carelessly post online to check a box, but something they actually spend money on. And they’re spending a lot of money because these ads do not stop. Where does this money come from?
While the CRC claims they support local businesses, they are instead funded by the world’s largest balloon manufacturers:
-Qualatex
-Pioneer Balloon Company
-Gemar
-Grabo Balloons
-Sempertex
All of this money is drowning out the perspectives of those who don’t have the ability to spam ads in everyone’s faces including the ratepayers of Alameda Municipal Power, marine and avian wildlife dying slow and brutal deaths, and the children and future generations who will have to live with this pollution.

Now, is this the most important agenda item the council will see this year? Probably not. But if international corporations are spending money to misinform the public and influence politics about balloons all the way down at the local level, you have to wonder what other more important topics are being influenced. Large automakers spend millions of dollars each year on superbowl ads alone, but you’ll never see a single superbowl ad for more affordable modes of transportation like bikes and public transit. It shouldn’t be a surprise that now as a result some people believe that cars are the only “valid” mode of transportation. The housing crisis is terrible for many people struggling to afford rent, but has been extremely profitable for realtors. The largest funder of political campaigns in San Francisco’s history, the source of a whopping 10% of all campaign funding in San Francisco for the last 4 years, was founded by 2 realtor lobbyists (https://missionlocal.org/2024/04/bigmoneysf-how-one-group-quickly- became-the-800-pound-gorilla-of-san-francisco-politics/). Terrible decisions get made if you only listen to people who have money.

I urge this council to confirm the banning of mylar balloons, but also do a very difficult thing for every other vote you cast. Before you vote, muster up all the humility you can, and consider how advertising and big money lobbying has adversely impacted the perspective of not just the constituents who speak to you, but more importantly, your own perspective on every topic you vote upon.

Thank you,
-Mitch Ball
From: Karly Kaufman
To: CITYCOUNCIL-List
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Opposition to mylar balloon ban
Date: Tuesday, December 2, 2025 9:40:24 AM
Good morning,
First let me say that I am an environmental scientist by training and fully aware of the environmental and infrastructure impacts associated with helium mylar balloons. I applaud efforts to make the City more environmentally friendly and prevent damage to public infrastructure.

However, I do not think this is the right approach - the tradeoff of damage to our local businesses is not worth the environmental benefit of this ban. This ban would just push sales elsewhere and would hurt our local businesses.

For example, there are some wonderful balloon artists in Alameda that create beautiful balloon sculptures and don't even use helium in their balloons. It is the helium balloons that cause the most damage when they escape, it hardly seems fair to negatively impact balloon artists who are not part of the problem.

I hope you will reconsider this total ban and look for alternatives such as public education instead. Thank you for your consideration.

Best,
Karly Kaufman
Alameda resident

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

December 1, 2025

Mayor Marilyn Ezzy Ashcraft
Vice Mayor Michele Pryor
Councilmember Greg Boller
Councilmember Tony Daysog
Councilmember Tracy Jensen

RE: Agenda Item 7-D Recommendation to Provide Direction on an Ordinance to Ban the Sale and Distribution of Mylar Balloons in Alameda.

Dear Members of the City Council:

Community Action for a Sustainable Alameda (CASA) is a community-wide coalition dedicated to raising awareness, mobilizing community action, and facilitating the implementation of the City’s Climate Action and Resiliency Plan and more generally to increase community sustainability and well-being.

We encourage the City Council to move forward to develop an ordinance to ban the sale and distribution of metallic foil (aka Mylar) balloons. In fact, we support the banning of all balloons.

1) According the Ocean Conservancy, balloons are the third most deadly ocean trash.

2) Coastal communities across the state and around the country, like Alameda, have banned the sale of all balloons, including East Hampton, Encinitas, Del Mar, Laguna Beach, and Solana Beach.

3) Metallic foil (Mylar) balloons are the source of power outages in Alameda and across the country.

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

4) Balloons are not recyclable or compostable and must be landfilled at the end of their useful life (which is very short). Latex balloons typically last only 12–24 hours and metallic foil (Mylar) balloons last just 5–7 days.

5) Alameda has been a leader in reducing plastic waste through its Alameda Disposable Food Service Ware Reduction Law.

6) Alameda can continue its leadership by banning the sale of all balloons, including metallic foil (Mylar) balloons.

Sincerely,

Ruth Abbe, Steering Committee
Community Action for a Sustainable Alameda

From: Sanjida Nahar
To: City Clerk
Cc: Duncan McFetridge; Jackson McFetridge
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Updated Letter of Opposition for Tomorrow’s Meeting Date: Monday, December 1, 2025 1:48:23 PM
Attachments: image001[76].png
Sign On Letter - Alameda .pdf
Hello,
I hope this message finds you well. Please find attached the updated letter expressing our strong opposition to the proposed ordinance that would ban the sale and distribution of Mylar (metallic) balloons in Alameda.

We appreciate the Council’s commitment to environmental stewardship and public safety, and we respectfully ask that you consider balanced alternatives to a full ban.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Best,
Sanjida
STRATEGY EXECUTION OUTCOMES

Sanjida Nahar
Vice President
[email protected]
818 912 9055

City of Alameda City Council 2263 Santa Clara Avenue Alameda, CA 94501 December 1, 2025 Dear Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft and Members of the Alameda City Council, We, the undersigned businesses and organizations, respectfully submit this letter to urge the Council

to

adopt

recommendations

that

address

foil-balloon

safety

without

imposing

a

ban

on

their

sale

and

distribution

in

Alameda.

While

we

fully

support

the

City’s

goals

of

reducing

powerline-related

outages,

protecting

the

grid,

and

advancing

sustainability,

we

believe

a

sales

and

use

ban

goes

further

than

necessary

to

mitigate

the

specific

risks

posed

by

Mylar

(foil)

balloons.

Such

an

approach

would

unintentionally

burden

small

businesses

and

limit

community

celebrations

without

measurably

improving

reliability

compared

to

more

targeted

interventions.

As

retailers,

employers,

and

community-serving

organizations

with

deep

roots

in

Alameda,

we

encourage

the

Council

to

prioritize

public

education,

responsible-use

practices,

and

other

less

restrictive

strategies

that

directly

address

powerline

hazards

while

preserving

local

traditions

and

the

economic

vitality

of

neighborhood

shops.

Across our businesses, celebration products—including balloons—play an important role in supporting

families,

schools,

small

events,

cultural

traditions,

and

local

gatherings.

Many

of

us

employ

Alameda

residents,

sponsor

community

activities,

and

serve

customers

who

depend

on

responsible,

high-quality

celebration

materials.

Because safety and environmental responsibility are central to how we operate, our businesses already

take

meaningful

steps

to

reduce

risks.

We

do

not

sell

or

promote

balloons

intended

for

release,

and

retailers

ensure

that

every

inflated

foil

balloon

is

properly

weighted
,

secured,

and

accompanied

by

clear

guidance

on

safe

handling

and

proper

disposal.

The

vast

majority

of

balloon purchases in Alameda are for indoor use , where there is no risk of contact with power lines

or

other

infrastructure.

For these reasons, a complete sales and distribution ban would place significant burdens on responsible

local

retailers

and

community

organizations

without

addressing

the

primary

cause

of

incidents
—the

improper

release

of

balloons

after

purchase.

This

behavior

can

be

addressed

most

effectively

through

education,

retailer–City

collaboration,

and

targeted

public

outreach,

rather

than

through

a

blanket

prohibition

on

lawful

products

that

can

and

are

used

safely.

It is also important to recognize that the State of California has already acted decisively through AB

847,

which

mandates

a

statewide

shift

to

non-conductive

foil

balloon

technology.

This

law

directly

addresses

the

very

issue

at

the

heart

of

AMP’s

concerns,

requiring

manufacturers

to

transition

away

from

conductive

foil

balloons

altogether.

With

a

statewide

phase-out

already

in

progress,

a

local

sales

ban

would

duplicate

existing

efforts

while

placing

disproportionate

burdens

on

Alameda

businesses.

We also have concerns that a full ban would unintentionally:
● Shift consumer purchases to retailers in neighboring cities or to unregulated online sellers,

● Reduce in-person opportunities for safety guidance at the point of sale, and ● Harm small businesses that depend on celebration products to sustain operations.

These consequences would not meaningfully reduce balloon misuse; instead, they would remove the

very

partners—local

retailers—who

are

best

positioned

to

educate

the

public

and

promote

safe,

responsible

use.

We believe Alameda can achieve its environmental and grid-reliability goals through more balanced

and

effective

strategies
,

including:

● A targeted ban on intentional balloon releases , ● City-retailer partnerships to promote safe handling and proper disposal, ● Public education campaigns addressing behaviors linked to power outages and litter, and These approaches directly respond to the underlying causes of environmental or electrical issues while

preserving

community

celebrations,

protecting

small

businesses,

and

maintaining

local

consumer

choice.

We welcome the opportunity to partner with the City of Alameda and Alameda Municipal Power on

solutions

that

keep

celebrations

safe,

protect

the

environment,

and

support

a

thriving

local

economy.

Together,

we

can

address

community

concerns

in

a

way

that

is

practical,

effective,

and

respectful

of

the

businesses

and

families

who

call

Alameda

home.

Thank you for your leadership and for considering an approach that reflects Alameda’s values of sustainability,

fairness,

and

community

partnership.

Sincerely,
Maria Stockham, Executive Director Coalition for Responsible Celebration Jennifer Silberman, SVP Chief Sustainability Officer Dollar Tree Tim James, Director of Local Government Relations

California Grocers Association Shariff Sayed, Partner On-Site Discount City Ingelore Dubs, Owner Dubs Deluxe Georgie Torres, Owner Georgie’s Party & Flowers Erika Stolyar, Owner Pop And Celebrate Michelle Ando, Owner Michelle’s Balloon Twisting Decor & More Salvador Tovar, Owner Sparky’s Balloons Jazmyn Flowers, Owner Balloons With A&Z Dave Floral, Chief Commercial Officer Mayflower Distributing

From: Sanjida Nahar
To: City Clerk
Cc: Maria Stockham; Duncan McFetridge
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Opposition to Proposed Mylar Balloon Sale & Use Ban — Letter Attached Date: Tuesday, November 18, 2025 2:53:26 PM
Attachments: image001[23].png
Sign On Letter - Alameda .pdf
Dear Mayor Ashcraft and Councilmembers,
I hope this message finds you well. Please find attached a formal letter expressing our strong opposition to the proposed ordinance that would ban the sale and distribution of Mylar (metallic) balloons within the City of Alameda. We appreciate the Council’s dedication to environmental stewardship and public safety, and we respectfully request that you consider alternatives to a full ban, such as enhanced education, targeted release restrictions, and retailer-partnering strategies.

Key points in our submitted letter include:

The balloon ban, as currently drafted, would create significant unintended consequences for small retailers, local celebratory traditions, and low-income families who rely on affordable event supplies.

A comprehensive ban risks shifting demand to less regulated alternatives, or driving purchases outside the city limits—negating the ordinance’s intended benefits.

We support the goals of litter reduction and safety, and believe those objectives can be met more equitably and cost-effectively through a suite of less-disruptive measures (for example: mandatory retailer signage, voluntary release prohibition zones, community clean-up programs).

We urge the Council to extend the stakeholder engagement period, include retailers and the event-service community in dialogue, and evaluate pilot programs before enacting a full prohibition.

We stand ready to assist with outreach, educational materials, or partnership efforts to help achieve your litter-reduction and environmental-safety goals without undermining the celebratory economy or placing undue burdens on small businesses.

Thank you very much for your time and consideration. We look forward to the opportunity to engage further on this important matter and appreciate your service to our city.

STRATEGY EXECUTION OUTCOMES

Sanjida Nahar
Vice President
[email protected]
818 912 9055

City of Alameda City Council 2263 Santa Clara Avenue Alameda, CA 94501 November 18, 2025 Dear Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft and Members of the Alameda City Council, We, the undersigned businesses and organizations, respectfully submit this letter to urge the Council

to

adopt

recommendations

that

address

foil-balloon

safety

without

imposing

a

ban

on

their

sale

and

distribution

in

Alameda.

While

we

fully

support

the

City’s

goals

of

reducing

powerline-related

outages,

protecting

the

grid,

and

advancing

sustainability,

we

believe

a

sales

and

use

ban

goes

further

than

necessary

to

mitigate

the

specific

risks

posed

by

Mylar

(foil)

balloons.

Such

an

approach

would

unintentionally

burden

small

businesses

and

limit

community

celebrations

without

measurably

improving

reliability

compared

to

more

targeted

interventions.

As

retailers,

employers,

and

community-serving

organizations

with

deep

roots

in

Alameda,

we

encourage

the

Council

to

prioritize

public

education,

responsible-use

practices,

and

other

less

restrictive

strategies

that

directly

address

powerline

hazards

while

preserving

local

traditions

and

the

economic

vitality

of

neighborhood

shops.

Across our businesses, celebration products—including balloons—play an important role in supporting

families,

schools,

small

events,

cultural

traditions,

and

local

gatherings.

Many

of

us

employ

Alameda

residents,

sponsor

community

activities,

and

serve

customers

who

depend

on

responsible,

high-quality

celebration

materials.

Because safety and environmental responsibility are central to how we operate, our businesses already

take

meaningful

steps

to

reduce

risks.

We

do

not

sell

or

promote

balloons

intended

for

release,

and

retailers

ensure

that

every

inflated

foil

balloon

is

properly

weighted
,

secured,

and

accompanied

by

clear

guidance

on

safe

handling

and

proper

disposal.

The

vast

majority

of

balloon purchases in Alameda are for indoor use , where there is no risk of contact with power lines

or

other

infrastructure.

For these reasons, a complete sales and distribution ban would place significant burdens on responsible

local

retailers

and

community

organizations

without

addressing

the

primary

cause

of

incidents
—the

improper

release

of

balloons

after

purchase.

This

behavior

can

be

addressed

most

effectively

through

education,

retailer–City

collaboration,

and

targeted

public

outreach,

rather

than

through

a

blanket

prohibition

on

lawful

products

that

can

and

are

used

safely.

It is also important to recognize that the State of California has already acted decisively through AB

847,

which

mandates

a

statewide

shift

to

non-conductive

foil

balloon

technology.

This

law

directly

addresses

the

very

issue

at

the

heart

of

AMP’s

concerns,

requiring

manufacturers

to

transition

away

from

conductive

foil

balloons

altogether.

With

a

statewide

phase-out

already

in

progress,

a

local

sales

ban

would

duplicate

existing

efforts

while

placing

disproportionate

burdens

on

Alameda

businesses.

We also have concerns that a full ban would unintentionally:
● Shift consumer purchases to retailers in neighboring cities or to unregulated online sellers,

● Reduce in-person opportunities for safety guidance at the point of sale, and ● Harm small businesses that depend on celebration products to sustain operations.

These consequences would not meaningfully reduce balloon misuse; instead, they would remove the

very

partners—local

retailers—who

are

best

positioned

to

educate

the

public

and

promote

safe,

responsible

use.

We believe Alameda can achieve its environmental and grid-reliability goals through more balanced

and

effective

strategies
,

including:

● A targeted ban on intentional balloon releases , ● City-retailer partnerships to promote safe handling and proper disposal, ● Public education campaigns addressing behaviors linked to power outages and litter, and ● Reasonable in-store safety requirements, such as mandatory balloon weights and warning labels.

These approaches directly respond to the underlying causes of environmental or electrical issues while

preserving

community

celebrations,

protecting

small

businesses,

and

maintaining

local

consumer

choice.

We welcome the opportunity to partner with the City of Alameda and Alameda Municipal Power on

solutions

that

keep

celebrations

safe,

protect

the

environment,

and

support

a

thriving

local

economy.

Together,

we

can

address

community

concerns

in

a

way

that

is

practical,

effective,

and

respectful

of

the

businesses

and

families

who

call

Alameda

home.

Thank you for your leadership and for considering an approach that reflects Alameda’s values of sustainability,

fairness,

and

community

partnership.

Sincerely,
Maria Stockham, Executive Director Coalition for Responsible Celebration Jennifer Silberman, SVP Chief Sustainability Officer

Dollar Tree Tim James, Director of Local Government Relations California Grocers Association Shariff Sayed, Partner On-Site Discount City Ingelore Dubs, Owner Dubs Deluxe Georgie Torres, Owner Georgie’s Party & Flowers Erika Stolyar, Owner Pop And Celebrate Michelle Ando, Owner Michelle’s Balloon Twisting Decor & More Salvador Tovar, Owner Sparky’s Balloons Jazmyn Flowers - Owner Balloons With A&Z

From: Jose Padilla
To: City Clerk
Cc: Jose Padilla
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Alameda Michaels Store Comments on Foil Balloon Ordinance Date: Tuesday, November 18, 2025 11:55:44 AM
Michaels Stores, Inc.
2650 5th St
Alameda, California 94501
11/18/2025
Dear Council Members:

Michaels appreciates the opportunity to comment on Alameda’s proposed ordinance addressing the sale and distribution of foil balloons (commonly referred to as “Mylar balloons”). We share the City’s commitment to environmental sustainability and grid reliability, and we value the thoughtful approach taken by City staff and Alameda Municipal Power (AMP).

At Michaels, our purpose is to fuel the joy of creativity and celebration. Our Alameda store employs local residents and serves families, teachers, and event planners who rely on high-quality celebration materials. We take our role in the community seriously.

Our store does not promote balloons intended for release, and every inflated foil balloon leaving our store is secured. We provide clear guidance on safe handling and proper disposal. The vast majority of foil balloon purchases at our Alameda store are for indoor use.

Accordingly, there is little to no risk of contact with overhead power lines.

Foil balloons are already regulated under California state law, including mandatory weights, warning labels, and restrictions on intentional release. Looking ahead, AB 847, passed in 2022, will require that by 2027 all foil balloons sold in the state meet strict electrical safety standards.

This proposed local ban duplicates those efforts is not necessary in light of the state-wide regulations, and implementing a total ban could result in unintended consequences, including:

Reducing tax revenue and foot traffic for local businesses Eliminating local jobs without effectively addressing environmental concerns In addition, banning local retailers from the sale of foil ballons will not eliminate the presence of foil ballons in Alameda. Customers will simply purchase ballons online or buy them outside of the city and bring them in.

Rather than enacting a blanket sales ban, we encourage the City of Alameda to consider more targeted and collaborative approaches, such as:

Public education campaigns promoting safe use and proper disposal Supporting the transition to safer, IEEE-compliant balloon products Enforcing existing state laws against balloon releases
At Michaels, we are committed to being part of the solution. Our teams are trained to follow state guidelines and we have signage in our stores to inform and educate customers on responsible balloon use.

We urge the Council to reject this ordinance and instead partner with local retailers like us to advance practical, effective strategies that serve the needs of Alameda residents and protect both the environment and our local economy.

Thank you for your leadership and for considering an approach that supports both environmental responsibility and the local businesses that serve Alameda residents.

Sincerely,
Jose Padilla
District Director, Bay Area
(M) 707-696-5856
[email protected]
Connect with Us:

Facebook
| Instagram | Twitter | Pinterest | YouTube | Join Our Team

*******CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE*******
This message and any attachments are confidential and only for addressed recipients. If you are not the intended recipient; printing, retaining, reproducing, disclosing or using any information contained is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender immediately and destroy the message and any attachments or copies (electronic or hard copy). This e-mail shall not be considered a legally binding agreement or amendment to any agreement.
***********************************
From: Elissa Glickman
To: City Clerk; Jennifer Ott
Cc: sharif sayed; Marie Ortega; Abby Thorne-Lyman; Dwayne Dalman Subject: [EXTERNAL] File #2025-5485 - Mylar Balloon Ordinances Date: Monday, November 17, 2025 9:16:31 AM
On behalf of the West Alameda Business Association (WABA) and the businesses in our district directly affected by the proposed ordinance regarding the sale and distribution of mylar (metallic) balloons, I am writing to respectfully request further review and deeper engagement with impacted retailers before the City moves forward.

WABA received notice of this agenda item on Thursday and quickly notified the businesses in our district who would be directly affected. However, these businesses had not previously been informed of the proposed changes, nor recall much engagement for input.

Two businesses in particular stand to be significantly affected:

Safeway (Alameda Landing location) – as a major retailer with balloon inventory and high customer volume.

Discount City – a small, long-standing West End business whose owner reports that approximately 80% of their balloon sales are mylar balloons. This represents a core part of their revenue.

In speaking with Discount City, they expressed that while they are fully sympathetic to the environmental and infrastructure concerns surrounding metallic balloons, but were understandably concerned this proposed ordinance would have a substantial impact on their operations.

A representative from Discount City will attend tomorrow’s meeting to respectfully request that the Council direct staff to revisit the ordinance and work more closely with affected businesses. Their goal is to collaboratively explore solutions that balance the very real environmental and utility challenges with policies that support economic vitality and the sustainability of both large and small retailers in our community.

For your convenience, I am cc’ing Ali and Sharif from Discount City should you wish to speak with them ahead of the meeting. Ali can also be reached by phone at 408-644-5930 (please note he is currently traveling in Spain).

Thank you for your thoughtful consideration of this matter. Our businesses deeply value their partnership with the City, and we look forward to a more in-depth and collaborative conversation about how to move forward in a way that meets our shared goals.

Warm regards,
Elissa Glickman
Executive Director
West Alameda Business Association (WABA)
------------------------------
Executive Director
West Alameda Business Association (WABA)
[email protected]
510-523-5955

← All documents from this meeting