Cities Index.
Presentation - Revised

Alameda City Council
December 2, 2025

Document
Presentation - Revised
Meeting
December 2, 2025
Body
Alameda City Council
Original file
306 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on legistar1.granicus.com. That file is the official record.

INCLUSIONARY HOUSING

ORDINANCE UPDATE

CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP
DECEMBER 2, 2025

BACKGROUND
Current ordinance:
• 15% affordable units for projects of 5+ units.
• Existing income mix no longer reflects current housing needs.

Housing Element Direction (Program 7):
• Calls for shifting toward deeper affordability.
• Ensure requirements remain feasible for housing development.

Why Update Now:
• Total RHNA (2023-2031): 5,353 units; Progress to date: 447 units. • Maintain eligibility for State/Regional funding tied to housing affordability.

CITY COUNCIL, DECEMBER 2, 2025 – INCLUSIONARY HOUSING ORDINANCE UPDATE 2

STATE AND REGIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Under State Law
 Cities may require 15% affordable
rental units
 Must offer alternative compliance
options
 State may review ordinances for
feasibility

Transit Oriented Communities
Funding Eligibility
 Rental: 15% <= Low Income
 Ownership: 15% <= Moderate
Income
 In-lieu fee: $100,000 per unit
 Waivers allowed only if infeasibility
is demonstrated
3CITY COUNCIL, DECEMBER 2, 2025 – INCLUSIONARY HOUSING ORDINANCE UPDATE

PROCESS AND ENGAGEMENT
Feasibility Study:

Conducted by StreetLevel Advisors to
model income mixes, feasibility, and
cost impacts.

Internal stakeholders:
• Housing and Human Services
Division
• Alameda Housing Authority
• Planning Board subcommittee
members
External stakeholders:
• Market-rate developers
• Nonprofit affordable housing
developers
Planning Board workshops:
• January 17, 2025
• May 27, 2025
• November 10, 2025
4 CITY COUNCIL, DECEMBER 2, 2025 – INCLUSIONARY HOUSING ORDINANCE UPDATE KEY FINDINGS - Market Realities & Feasibility
What We Learned About Feasibility:
• Rental and ownership projects have different economics • Updated ratios can keep overall costs similar to today’s ordinance • Small adjustments can encourage either on-site units or in-lieu fees Will this Make a Difference?
Refining inclusionary requirements helps, but broader economic factors (materials, labor, financing) ultimately determine feasibility. 5 CITY COUNCIL, DECEMBER 2, 2025 – INCLUSIONARY HOUSING ORDINANCE UPDATE KEY FINDINGS – HOUSING NEED
Targeting Alameda’s Housing Need
• Moderate-Income rentals often mirror market rents and offer limited added benefit.
• Low-Income units best match unmet rental housing needs in Alameda.
• Very Low-Income units are typically produced through
larger nonprofit or publicly funded projects w/ the
Alameda Housing Authority.
6 CITY COUNCIL, DECEMBER 2, 2025 – INCLUSIONARY HOUSING ORDINANCE UPDATE KEY FINDINGS – IN LIEU FEES
7 Fee Structure
• Expand in-lieu fees to all project types
• Set fees comparable to on-site unit costs
• Use per-square-foot rates so fees scale with unit size Policy & Legal Considerations
• Expanding fees to larger projects will require a nexus study • Fees can be calibrated to guide outcomes:
• Higher fees to incentivize on-site units.
• Lower fees to incentivize fee payment to fund affordable housing. • Structure allows the City to adjust over time to changing housing needs.

CITY COUNCIL, DECEMBER 2, 2025 – INCLUSIONARY HOUSING ORDINANCE UPDATE

OTHER KEY FINDINGS
8 Criteria for Clustered Option
• Allows larger projects to separate affordability levels (MOD onsite; deeper-affordability off-site).
• Off-site units may be delivered by nonprofit partners (e.g., AHA). • Requires establishing better, clearer criteria and a formal review process.

Term of Affordability
• Defines how long units must remain deed-restricted affordable. • Best practice is shifting from a 59-year term to 99 years.

CITY COUNCIL, DECEMBER 2, 2025 – INCLUSIONARY HOUSING ORDINANCE UPDATE

INCOME LIMITS & RENT / SALES PRICES
Affordability
Category
Area Median
Income Level
Income Limit
(4-person HH)
Maximum
Rent
Maximum
Sale Price
Very Low (VLI) 50% AMI $79,900 $2,000 $108,000
Low (LI) 80% AMI $125,050 $3,250 $279,000
Median (MED) 100% AMI $159,800 $3,650 $364,000
Moderate (MOD) 120% AMI $191,750 $4,050 $449,000
9 • Alameda County AMI (2024): $159,800 for 4-person household • All values are approximate / rounded
CITY COUNCIL, DECEMBER 2, 2025 – INCLUSIONARY HOUSING ORDINANCE UPDATE 10 RENTAL INCLUSIONARY REQUIREMENT
CITY COUNCIL, DECEMBER 2, 2025 – INCLUSIONARY HOUSING ORDINANCE UPDATE Recommended Rental Requirement
11 Require Rental Units at 15% Low Income (or equivalent)  Maintains the overall inclusionary requirement at 15%.  Aligns with AB 1505 and TOC eligibility for 15% of rental units to be provided at Low Income (or equivalent).
 Targets households not already served by market-rate or nonprofit development.
 Avoids reserving units at rent levels already attainable without subsidy.

CITY COUNCIL, DECEMBER 2, 2025 – INCLUSIONARY HOUSING ORDINANCE UPDATE Recommended Rental Requirement
12 Very Low
Income Low Income Moderate
Income TOTAL COST / SF
Existing 4% 4% 7% 15% $17.50
Option 1 * -- 15% -- 15% $20.00
Option 2 5% 5% -- 10% $19.00
Option 3 8% -- -- 8% $19.50
*Primary staff recommendation
NOTE: Costs are relative using baseline assumptions – per month CITY COUNCIL, DECEMBER 2, 2025 – INCLUSIONARY HOUSING ORDINANCE UPDATE 13 OWNERSHIP INCLUSIONARY REQUIREMENT
CITY COUNCIL, DECEMBER 2, 2025 – INCLUSIONARY HOUSING ORDINANCE UPDATE Recommended Ownership Requirement
14 Require Ownership Units at 5% Low and 10% Moderate Income (or equivalent)
 Maintains the current overall share of 15% deed-restricted units.  Expands ownership opportunities for lower income households.  Meets TOC criteria requiring 15% of ownership units at Moderate Income or equivalent.
 Better reflects local ownership demand while reducing required per-unit subsidy.
 Provides eligibility for a 5% density bonus and incentives.

CITY COUNCIL, DECEMBER 2, 2025 – INCLUSIONARY HOUSING ORDINANCE UPDATE Recommended Ownership Requirement
15 Very Low
Income Low Income Moderate
Income TOTAL COST / UNIT
Existing 4% 4% 7% 15% $10,350
Option 1 -- -- 15% 15% $8,250
Option 2 -- 6% 6% 12% $7,650
Option 3 -- 10% -- 10% $7,250
Option 4 * -- 5% 10% 15% $9,125
* Primary staff recommendation
• NOTE: Costs are relative using baseline assumptions – at time of sale CITY COUNCIL, DECEMBER 2, 2025 – INCLUSIONARY HOUSING ORDINANCE UPDATE Recommended In-Lieu Fee Framework
16 Expand the In-Lieu Fee to Apply to All Housing Projects  Creates a consistent and flexible local funding source for affordable housing.
 Supports grants that require local match contributions.  Helps serve very low, extremely low, and special-needs households.  Enables programs such as acquisition/rehab, seismic/flood upgrades, and nonprofit pre-development.
 Expanding fees to larger projects will require a nexus study.

CITY COUNCIL, DECEMBER 2, 2025 – INCLUSIONARY HOUSING ORDINANCE UPDATE CITY COUNCIL, DECEMBER 2, 2025 – INCLUSIONARY HOUSING ORDINANCE UPDATE 17

LOCAL IN-LIEU FEES
Other cities collect fees per unit, based on valuation
$27.50 Existing Fee
Equivalent
$50 - Recommended
For-Sale In-lieu Fee
$25 - Recommended
Rental In-lieu Fee
Recommended In-Lieu Fee Framework
18 Small Projects
(5-9 units)
All Projects
(5+ units) Rental For Sale
Existing Fee
(small projects) $28,149 / unit
Equivalent to
Existing Fee $27.50
Equivalent to
Existing Unit
Requirements
$17.50 $62.00
Staff
Recommendation $25.00 $50.00
• Fees are per net square foot of floor area in the project • Allow partial fee for partial units
CITY COUNCIL, DECEMBER 2, 2025 – INCLUSIONARY HOUSING ORDINANCE UPDATE Recommended Clustered Development
Approach
Clustered Development Should be Encouraged
 Establish clear criteria for evaluating clustered proposals.  Designate the City Manager as the decision-maker.
 Require review by Housing & Human Services and the
Housing Authority.
 Consider competitiveness for external funding sources.  Ensure clustered proposals are equivalent to other
compliance options.
19 CITY COUNCIL, DECEMBER 2, 2025 – INCLUSIONARY HOUSING ORDINANCE UPDATE 20 Recommended Affordability Term
Extend Term of Affordability
 Existing requirement: 59 years
 Proposed requirement: 99 years
Aligns with best practice and preserves long-term
affordability
CITY COUNCIL, DECEMBER 2, 2025 – INCLUSIONARY HOUSING ORDINANCE UPDATE 21 Planning Board/Developer Feedback
Planning Board Feedback:
• Supports staff’s primary recommendation and expanding flexibility • Supports temporary relief measures to support housing production Developer Feedback:
• Support allowing in-lieu fees for larger projects
• Request lower fee levels (as low as $10/sq ft) to improve feasibility Staff Response:
• Support expanding compliance options; will prepare nexus study. • Caution: Reducing inclusionary requirements alone may not guarantee new housing, as feasibility depends on broader market conditions.

CITY COUNCIL, DECEMBER 2, 2025 – INCLUSIONARY HOUSING ORDINANCE UPDATE 22 RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY
Compliance Option Existing
Requirements
Proposed Rental Proposed Ownership
Inclusionary Units 15% =
7% MOD +
4% LI +
4% VLI
15% Low Income
And other options in Table 2
5% Low Income & 10%
Moderate
And other options in Table 3
In-Lieu Fee
(Subject to nexus
study)
Projects with
5 to 9 units only:
$28,149 per unit
All projects > 5 units:
$25 per net sq ft
All projects > 5 units:
$50 per net sq ft
Clustered Option Subject to
Planning Board
approval
• Establish standard
procedures
• Require City Manager
approval
• Ensure competitiveness for
leveraged funding.
• Require land + cash equal
to the in-lieu fee value.

Same as Rental
Period of Affordability 59 years 99 years 99 years
CITY COUNCIL, DECEMBER 2, 2025 – INCLUSIONARY HOUSING ORDINANCE UPDATE

NEXT STEPS

1. Prepare a draft ordinance for Planning Board and City Council review in Spring 2026.

2. Work with City Attorney on a Nexus Study for expanding in-lieu fees (separate track from the ordinance update).

3. Implement any additional direction from the City Council. 23 CITY COUNCIL, DECEMBER 2, 2025 – INCLUSIONARY HOUSING ORDINANCE UPDATE

← All documents from this meeting