Cities Index.
Minutes, first session

Alhambra City Council
December 11, 2023

Document
Minutes, first session
Meeting
December 11, 2023
Body
Alhambra City Council
Original file
342 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on www.alhambraca.gov. That file is the official record.

1 12-11 -2 3
Unofficial until approved by the
Alhambra City Council

MINUTES
Regular Meeting

ALHAMBRA CITY COUNCIL
December 11 , 202 3
6:0 0 p.m.

ROLL CALL: At 6: 1 8 p.m., on Monday, December 11 , 202 3 , the Alhambra City Council met in the Council Chambers of Alhambra City Hall
PRESENT: ANDRADE-STADLER, LEE , MALONEY , PÉREZ, MAZA
ABSENT: NONE
Officials Present: City Manager Binnquist, City Attorney Montes, Assistant City Manager Garcia, Deputy City Manager Stover, City Clerk Myles, Director of Finance Lieu, Director of Parks and Recreation Macias, Director of Library LohGuan, Director of Community Development Ho, Director of Human Resources Ko , Chief of Police Kennedy , Principal Planner McCurley , Battalion Chief Petta FLAG SALUTE : Led by Mayor Maza
LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT : We acknowledge d that the land on which we are gathered is the traditional, ancestral, and unceded territory of the Gabrielino/ Tongva peoples. We seek to prioritize respect for the historic culture and contemporary presence of the native peoples throughout California, especially in the greater Los Angeles/Alhambra area. We come with respect and gratitude for the Gabrielino/ Tongva people who still consider themselves the caretakers of this land. It is through their examples that we are reminded of our greater responsibility to take care of Mother Earth and to take care of each other.

COUNCIL BUSINESS
1 . REQUEST FOR COUNCILMEMBER PARTICIPATION VIA VIDEO/TELECONFERENCE PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54953(F) – F2M23-7, M2M23-180 City Attorney MONTES delivered a staff report. On October 9, 2023, Councilmember Andrade-Stadler requested that her Council colleagues vote to allow her participation via video/teleconference at the October 23, 2023 City Council meeting due to medical reasons.

Under current Government Code section 54953(f), this was allowable action if approved by the City Council.

Discussion: Councilmember ANDRADE-STADLER confirmed there were no other adults in the room with her at her location. She stated that she was undergoing a medical treatment which compromised her immune system.

Action Taken: City Council approved Councilmember Andrade-Stadler ’s request by motion and vote d to allow her to participate and vote remotely via video/teleconference in City Council meetings due to an emergency medical reason under Government Code Section 54953(f). (M2M23-180 )
Vote: Moved: PÉREZ Seconded: LEE
Ayes: MALONEY, LEE , PÉREZ, MAZA
Noes : NONE

Absent: NONE
Abstain: ANDRADE-STADLER
2 12-11 -2 3
MAZA : Mayor MAZA requested to move the consent calendar portion of the agenda to after the ceremonial items. There were no objections.

CEREMONIALS

2. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE: WINNIE KWAN-SAM – F2M23-3
Mayor MAZA and the City Council commend ed and thank ed Clerical Assistant III Winnie Kwan-Sam for her 34 years of faithful and loyal service to the Police Department and the City of Alhambra. Mayor MAZA present ed a Certificate of Service plaque to Ms. Kwan-Sam for her outstanding work for the City.

3. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE: DENISE FERNANDEZ – F2M23-3 Mayor MAZA and the City Council commend ed and thank ed Dispatcher Denise Fernandez for her 24 years of faithful and loyal service to the Police Department and the City of Alhambra.

Mayor MAZA present ed a Certificate of Service plaque to Ms. Fernandez for her outstanding work for the City. Ms. FERNANDEZ expressed her gratitude for her years of service.

CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING

4. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING FOR COUNCIL DELIBERATION CONCERNING ORDINANCE O2M23-4823 APPROVING ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT AMD-23-10 (THE COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO THE CITY OF ALHAMBRA ZONING CODE [TITLE 23 OF THE ALHAMBRA MUNICIPAL CODE]) AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENT AMD-23-09 (AN AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF ALHAMBRA OFFICIAL ZONING MAP); AND A RESOLUTION APPROVING GENERAL PLAN TEXT AMENDMENT AMD-23-08 (AN

AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN CHAPTER OF THE CITY OF ALHAMBRA GENERAL PLAN, VISION 2040), GENERAL PLAN MAP AMENDMENT AMD-23-07 (AN AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF ALHAMBRA GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP), AND INITIAL STUDY/NEGATIVE DECLARATION – F2M20-24, N2M23-127, O2M23-4823, R2M23-54
Director of Community Development HO made a presentation, which is on file with the City Clerk ’s Office. This was the time and place set by Notice No. N2M23-127 and duly continued from the November 13, 2023 meeting, for the City Council to hold a public hearing to consider a General Plan Map Amendment, General Plan Text Amendment, Zoning Map Amendment and Zoning Text Amendment adopting the comprehensive update to the City of Alhambra Zoning Code (Title 23 of the Alhambra Municipal Code), an Amendment to the City of Alhambra Official Zoning Map, an Amendment to the Land Use and Community Design Chapter of the City of Alhambra General Plan, Vision 2040, and an Amendment to the City of Alhambra General Plan Land Use Map (the “Project ”); and to adopt the Initial Study/Negative Declaration for the Project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

At the November 13, 2023 meeting, the City Council heard a presentation on the comprehensive update to the City of Alhambra Zoning Code (Title 23 of the Alhambra Municipal Code) and then opened the public hearing to receive public testimony. After closing the public testimony portion of the public hearing, the City Council began their deliberations with discussion of the Planning Commission ’s recommended revisions to the proposed Zoning Code, including the recommended maximum height allowances in the EMC (East Main Corridor) zone. The City Council voted 3-2, to revise the maximum height allowance in the EMC zone to 3 stories and 35 ’ in height above-ground between Chapel Avenue and Granada Avenue as a first step in their deliberations. The City Council then moved to continue the public 3 12-11 -2 3
hearing to the December 11, 2023 meeting for purposes of further Council deliberation and possible action only (no further public comment).

At the conclusion of the November 13, 2023 meeting, the Council also asked staff to identify certain information already existing in the record for Council ’s use at the December 11, 2023 meeting. Specifically, the City Council asked to be directed to information on the RHNA (Regional Housing Needs Assessment) allocation and required RHNA buffer. This information, specifically figures and tables with data on the City ’s site capacity and the estimated surplus, or buffer, above the City ’s RHNA requirement, was included in the 2021-2029 Housing Element that was re-adopted by the City Council at a public hearing on October 9, 2023. The provided figures and tables from the 2021-2029 Housing Element identified the theoretical and realistic capacity. As stated in the Housing Element, the theoretical capacity of 23,470 units assumed redevelopment of rezoned and upzoned sites at maximum densities; however, only a share of this theoretical capacity were sites with any realistic potential to redevelop. The Housing Element applied adjustments, which took into consideration realistic capacity and redevelopment potential. As a result, the adjusted capacity for new sites after completion of necessary rezoning and upzoning was only 5,562 units. The capacity of 5,562 units at new sites contributed to the City ’s total adopted sites inventory capacity of 7,642 units, which provided a buffer of 11% above the required RHNA of 6,825 units.

The staff reports and attachments from all previous Planning Commission and City Council presentations on the Zoning Code, including the staff report and attachments prepared for the public hearing on November 13 th , are available through the project website at:
https://www.alhambracodeupdate.com/participate .

Director of Community Development HO referred to the 20 provisions or comments provided by the Planning Commission, indicated the 10 items for which Staff and the Planning Commission were not in alignment, and stated that staff was prepared to present all items together or address each item individually where Council could deliberate and provide direction to Staff. Mayor MAZA requested that Council deliberate each point individually.

Discussion: Director of Community Development HO discussed comment #2: 100% residential uses in the Central Business District (CBD).

Vice Mayor PÉREZ discussed banning housing on the first floor and if it conflicted with State law. Mr. HO responded to questions. Councilmember MALONEY noted the importance of consistency with the Council decision regarding the Housing Element , discussed an incentive program for developers to put in commercial uses on the ground floor of buildings.

Councilmember LEE noted that it was ideal to have commercial spaces on the ground floor, noted that the recommendation made by the Planning Commission was strong language, inquired about the process to obtain minor-use permits, and noted her support for staff ’s recommendation. Mr. HO responded to questions. Mayor MAZA noted his support for staff ’s recommendation for 100% residential use on the ground floor and expressed his support for an incentive program for developers to keep commercial on the ground floor.

Action Taken: The City Council supported staff ’s recommendation for comment #2 and directed staff to explore a potential incentive program for developers to keep commercial on the ground floor.

Vote: Moved: MALONEY Seconded: PÉREZ
Ayes: MALONEY, ANDRADE-STADLER, LEE, PÉREZ, MAZA
Noes : NONE

Absent: NONE
Discussion : Mr. HO discussed comment #5: PO & I Zones: Multifamily Residential Uses. 4 12-11 -2 3
Ms. PÉREZ inquired about the Planning Commission ’s concern related to superfund sites, inquired about a project admitted by right vs. a project requiring a conditional use permit, and noted that she preferred the Planning Commission ’s recommendation. Mr. HO responded to questions. Mr. MALONEY noted that requiring conditional use permits could be seen as a barrier to development by HCD. Mr. HO responded to questions and City Attorney MONTES discussed the difference between a CPU vs. a RPD process. Ms. ANDRADE-STALDER inquired about the status of the updated RPD process. Mr. MONTES provided clarification.

The Council continued to discuss staff ’s recommendation vs. the Planning Commission ’s recommendation. Ms. LEE noted her support for the Planning Commission ’s recommendation.

Mr. MAZA noted his support for staff ’s recommendation and suggested the Council could come back at a later date and review the modified RPD process. Ms. PÉREZ noted her support for Mayor MAZA ’s recommendation. M r. MALONEY also expressed his support for the recommendation as long as it did not impact by-right projects.

Action Taken: The City Council supported staff ’s recommendation for comment #5, along with the modifications to the RPD sections of the code to be consistent with the housing element, and that the Council will look at future modifications of the RPD process.

Vote: Moved: MAZA Seconded: MALONEY
Ayes: PÉREZ, MALONEY, MAZA
Noes : LEE, ANDRADE-STADLER

Absent: NONE
Discussion : Mr. HO discussed comment #6: Minimum Residential Side Yard Setbacks.

Ms. LEE discussed privacy concerns for single story properties if multiple story properties were built around it, inquired about current multiple story properties next to single-story properties, and Mr. HO responded to questions. Mr. MALONEY expressed his support for the Planning Commission ’s recommendation. M r. MAZA expressed his support to protect single-story residential homes and referenced an example of Main St. where a multi-level car dealership overlook ed a single-story residential home.

Ms. LEE noted that she would rather see developments not be built directly to the property line, stated that neither solution presented by staff or the Planning Commission would solve the problem, and recommended tabling this item for discussion at a future meeting. Ms.

ANDRADE-STADLER noted that she did not want to see future developments similar to the car dealership next to the residential home and supported Ms. LEE ’s recommendation to table the item unless the Council c ould come to a resolution. M r. MALONEY noted his preference to make a determination on this item at this meeting, noted the proposed regulations would provide mitigation measures to help ensure that situations such as the car dealership would not happen in the future.

Ms. PÉREZ inquired about similar regulations from other cities in the area. Mr. MAZA and Mr.

HO provided clarification. Mr. MAZA noted that he would support staff ’s recommendation, with the provision that the Council revisit this issue in the future. Ms. LEE noted that staff ’s recommendation was a step forward in trying to mitigate the negative impacts in the neighborhoods with respect to multi-story buildings in residential neighborhoods and expressed support to bring this discussion back to the Council in mid-2024.

Action Taken: The City Council supported staff ’s recommendation for comment #6 and directed staff to bring back a discussion in mid-2024 with alternative options. 5 12-11 -2 3
Vote: Moved: LEE Seconded: MAZA
Ayes: ANDRADE-STADLER, PÉREZ, MALONEY, LEE, MAZA
Noes : NONE

Absent: NONE
Discussion : Mr. HO discussed comment #8: RM, RH Zones: Maximum Stories.

Ms. ANDRADE-STADLER expressed support for staff ’s recommendation. Ms. LEE inquired about examples in the City where RL would be next to RH zones. Mr. HO provided examples.

Ms. LEE stated that she underst ood the intention behind the Planning Commission ’s recommendation but expressed her support for the staff ’s recommendation. Mr. MAZA reiterated Councilmember LEE ’s comments and expressed his support for staff ’s recommendation.

Action Taken: The City Council supported staff ’s recommendation for comment # 8.

Vote: Moved: ANDRADE-STADLER Seconded: PÉREZ
Ayes : MALONEY, LEE, ANDRADE-STADLER, PÉREZ, MAZA
Noes : NONE

Absent: NONE
Discussion : Mr. HO discussed comment #22: Non-Residential Zones: Maximum Stories & Heights.

Ms. PÉREZ discussed the border of the Central Business District (CBD) and if the area west of Almansor St. should be included in the CBD, and supported keeping buildings at no more than 3-stories that were located near residential zones. Mr. MALONEY discussed the pros and cons of including or not including the streets. Ms. ANDRADE-STADLER reiterated the comments by Vice Mayor PÉREZ and noted that it was critical to include alleys in the buffer zones. Ms. LEE discussed including the alleys or streets in the buffer zone and expressed support for staff ’s recommendation. Mr. MAZA expressed support for additional buffer area and expressed support for Planning Commission ’s recommendation.

The Council discussed the differences between staff ’s recommendation vs. the Planning Commission's recommendation. Mr. HO noted that if they count ed the street and alley as a buffer, that would support staff ’s recommendation. Mr. MONTES provided further clarification.

Ms. LEE expressed her support for staff ’s recommendation as-is.

Action Taken: The City Council supported staff ’s recommendation for comment #22.

Vote: Moved: LEE Seconded: ANDRADE-STADLER
Ayes : LEE, MALONEY, PÉREZ, ANDRADE-STADLER, MAZA
Noes : NONE

Absent: NONE
RECESS & RECONVENE : Mayor Maza called for a brief recess at 8:30 p.m . and the meeting resumed with all Councilmembers present at 8:45 p.m.

Discussion : Mr. HO discussed comment #23: Maximum Heights in the East Main Corridor (EMC ). Mr. HO referred to Council ’s deliberation at the November 13, 2023 public hearing and stated that Staff required direction as to the building height standard.

Ms. PÉREZ noted that the Council had a lot of feedback from residents on this item and they were comfortable with a consistent 3-story height across the EMC. Mr. MALONEY noted that the proposal of 75-feet or 55 -feet in that area was not appropriate and expressed support for 6 12-11 -2 3
a 3-story height limi t. Mr. MALONEY and Mr. HO discussed the effect of reduced building heights on fulfilling RHNA goals . Mr. MALONEY and Mr. HO discussed the previously approved setback limits. Mr. MALONEY expressed support for allowing additional density in the area near Almansor St. to Chapel Ave. to reduce the pressure in the remainder of the East Main Corridor. Ms. PÉREZ inquired about the borders of the EMC and Mr. HO provided clarification stating that the western border of the EMC was at Chapel Ave up to Granada and allow for 3-stories at 35-feet . He stated that under the Draft Zoning Code everything east of Granada prohibited housing and the maximum building height was 2-stories at 25-feet. Mr.

HO also clarified the buffer zones near residential zones. Mr. MALONEY and Mr. HO discussed ground floor commercial building heights depending on the type of development.

Mr. MALONEY and Mr. HO discussed incentives to encourage ground floor commercial or retail space.

Ms. ANDRADE-STADLER expressed support for 3-story height limits from Chapel Ave. to the end of the east side of the EMC. Ms. LEE noted that keeping a 3-story height limit would bring consistency throughout the City. Mr. MAZA supported 5-story height limits from Chapel Ave. to Almansor St. Ms. LEE referred to the previous discussion related to the EMC, the need for subterranean parking, reiterated her thoughts that there need ed to be consistency throughout the City and supported a 3-story height limit. Ms. ANDRADE-STADLER provided background on the area of Main St. that border ed San Gabriel and how the Council was willing to go to 3- story height limits as opposed to 2-story height limits. Mr. MAZA inquired about the RHNA impacts to the City if there was a restriction of 3-story height limits from Chapel Ave. to Almansor St. Mr. HO provided clarification.

Mr. MAZA and Mr. MONTES discussed comments made by Ms. Lee that this item had been previously voted on. Mr. MONTES clarified that although Council was taking intermediate motions by voting on individual items to establish consensus, there was no final action until Council gave first reading to the ordinance and then second reading. He stated that until the final motion to approve the ordinance was given, none of the motions were legally binding. He made reference to several variables that required additional clarification pertaining to the area between Granada and the eastern City limit.

The Council continued to discuss a 3-story height limits vs. a 5-story height limit and potential areas in the City that could accommodate higher density. Ms. PÉREZ and Ms. LEE discussed the difference between 35-feet and 40-feet and mixed-use projects east of Granada. Mr.

MALONEY supported 40-feet heights to be consistent with the rest of the City. Mr. HO clarified that the RM zone has a 35-feet height limit. Ms. LEE and Mr. HO discussed housing east of Granada and the perspectives of residents as expressed over previous developments . Ms.

LEE supported 2-story mixed use commercial and residential development east of Granada.

Mr. MALONEY suggested adjusting the block between Chapel and Almansor to 4-stories, and Almansor to eastern boundary at 3-stories at 35-feet with residential use unless the development included ground floor commercial use in which case the height limit would be 40-feet. Ms. LEE expressed she did not want to vote again on an area that had been previously decided upon. She stated that she supported allowing housing from Granada to eastern border at 2-stories to potentially attract small businesses on the ground floor. Council continued to discuss changes to direction regarding building height in the area between Chapel and Granada as well as building heights from Granada to the eastern border.

Ms. ANDRADE-STADLER motioned to include 3-stories at 35-feet from Chapel to the eastern City limit. Ms. LEE requested an amendment changing it from Granada Ave. to the eastern City limit, due to the previous vote regarding the area from Chapel to Granada. Ms.

ANDRADE-STADLER agreed to the amendment and Ms. LEE seconded the motion. Ms.

Andrade-Stadler, Ms. Lee, and Ms. Pérez voted “yes. ” Mr. MALONEY and Mr. MAZA voted “no ” due to the lack of 5-feet in building height and the limitations on potential commercial development.
7 12-11 -2 3
Action Taken: The City Council supported 3-story height limits from Granada Ave . to the Eastern City limit.

Vote: Moved: ANDRADE-STADLER Seconded: LEE
Ayes : ANDRADE-STADLER, LEE, PÉREZ
Noes : MALONEY, MAZA

Absent: NONE
Discussion : Ms. PÉREZ encouraged Ms. LEE to reach out to individuals in her district who ha d concerns and continued to discuss the differences between 35-feet and 40-feet and the ways it may impact developers ’ interest in bringing worthwhile projects to Alhambra. She inquired about the process to approve the final zoning code changes and Mr. MONTES provided clarification regarding the adoption process . Mr. MAZA discussed the impacts of putting restrictions on parcels where housing was being built and specifically referred to the developers of 801 E. Main St and potential affordable housing projects.

Discussion: Mr. HO discussed comment #24: Industrial Zones: Maximum Stories & Heights.

Action Taken: The City Council supported the Planning Commission ’s recommendation for comment #24.

Vote: Moved: ANDRADE-STADLER Seconded: LEE
Ayes: MALONEY, PÉREZ, ANDRADE-STADLER, LEE, MAZA
Noes : NONE

Absent: NONE
Discussion : Mr. HO discussed comment #39: Common Open Space Requirements.

Ms. LEE inquired about why the Planning Commission was focusing on the RM zone, inquired if developments are required to have front yard space, and Principal Planner MCCURLEY and Mr. HO responded to questions.

Mr. MALONEY expressed concern with concrete open space and supported a requirement that would include potted plants or green space to make the space usable. Ms. PÉREZ supported mandating installing plants or green space in open spaces.

Action Taken: The City Council supported designing common space that accommodate d amenities that include d but were not limited to urban furniture, landscaping, family friendly uses, and some kind of shade structure, with the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development.

Vote: Moved: MALONEY Seconded: PÉREZ
Ayes: LEE, PÉREZ, ANDRADE-STADLER, MALONEY , MAZA
Noes : NONE

Absent: NONE
Discussion : Mr. HO discussed additional recommendation #1: Affordable Housing on Religious Facility Sites – Affordability Requirements.

Ms. PÉREZ noted that State laws ma de this requirement confusing and inquired about the percentage threshold for affordable housing approval. Mr. MONTES responded to questions.

Mr. MALONEY inquired if the City was forced to use State law as a guide and Mr. MONTES 8 12-11 -2 3
provided clarification. Ms. ANDRADE-STADLER inquired about the income levels that would be qualified for affordable housing and Ms. PÉREZ provided clarification and noted that lower income levels would not benefit from this affordable housing.

Ms. LEE discussed the struggles of moderate to low-income individuals and stated the City need ed to create housing opportunities for those individuals.

Mr. MAZA expressed support for staff ’s recommendation.

Action Taken: The City Council supported staff ’s recommendation for additional recommendation #1.

Vote: Moved: MAZA Seconded: MALONEY
Ayes: PÉREZ, MALONEY, ANDRADE-STADLER, LEE, MAZA
Noes : NONE

Absent: NONE
Discussion : Mr. HO discussed additional recommendation #4: PO Development Standards – Provisions for “30 acres or more ”
Ms. ANDRADE-STADLER inquired about T he Alhambra project and how many housing units the developer was building per acre. Mr. HO responded to questions.

Ms. LEE discussed the density requirements if the lot was more or less than 10,000 square feet, inquired how many lots in the City were 30 acres or more, inquired how many unit s a 43 - acre lot could accommodate, and Mr. HO responded to questions.

Ms. PÉREZ expressed support for Planning Commission ’s recommendation.

Mr. MALONEY inquired if the Council would downzone the property if it approve d the Planning Commission ’s recommendation. Mr. MONTES provided clarification. Mr. MALONEY expressed concern with the no-net loss rule with HCD but stated he was inclined to support the Planning Commission ’s recommendation . He inquired about comment #1: low barrier navigation centers, and if staff and the Planning Commission were on the same page. Mr. HO responded to questions. Mr. MALONEY inquired about RPD process and clarified that statutory by-right projects would not be included, referenced the proposed zoning map and stated that Burke Heritage Park and the Alhambra A rch should be designated as public facilities. Mr. MONTES stated that there should not be any issues with no-net loss with references to T he Alhambra Project if they were to go down to 43 units per acre.

Action Taken: The City Council supported Planning Commission ’s recommendation for additional recommendation #4.

Vote: Moved: PÉREZ Seconded: LEE
Ayes: ANDRADE-STADLER, MALONEY, LEE, PÉREZ, MAZA
Noes : NONE

Absent: NONE
Discussion : Ms. MCCURLEY went over the Planning Commission ’s zoning classification and land-use recommendation matrix.

Mr. MAZA supported keeping a buffer between residential and commercial sites. Ms. PÉREZ inquired if the future Chinatown Service Development was ok ay with the split zone designation and Ms. MCCURLEY responded to questions. Mr. MALONEY expressed concern with the use of the property in the next 50 or 60 years with split zone designation. Ms. ANDRADE- 9 12-11 -2 3
STADLER inquired if the designation was removed if the lots were merged together and Ms.

MCCURLEY provided clarification. Mr. MAZA inquired if there were additional lots in the City that would be under split-zone designations and Principal Planner MCCURLEY provided clarification. Ms. PÉREZ expressed support to move forward with Planning Commission ’s recommendation with 17 S. Cordova and 21 S. Cordova and to move forward with staff ’s commendation on the remaining sites.

Action Taken: The City Council supported moving forward with the Planning Commission ’s recommendation with 17 S. Cordova and 21 S. Cordova and moving forward with staff ’s recommendation on the remaining sites.

Vote: Moved: PÉREZ Seconded: ANDRADE-STADLER
Ayes: LEE, MALONEY, PÉREZ, ANDRADE-STADLER, MAZA
Noes : NONE

Absent: NONE
Discussion : Mr. MONTES provided an overview of the Planning Commission recommendations that the Council agreed to at this meeting.

Ms. PÉREZ made a motion to extend the CBD to west of Almansor St. Seconded by Mr.

MALONEY. Ms. LEE noted that extending the CBD would affect the height requirements that the Council previously voted on. Mr. HO and Mr. MONTES provided clarification. Ms. PÉREZ asked if the City would meet the housing requirements with HCD in keeping the current height requirements and Mr. HO answered affirmatively. Ms. PÉREZ withdrew he r motion to extend the CBD to Almansor St.

Councilmember LEE clarified that her concerns with extending the height limits were mainly due to pedestrian safety in that area as increased units would increase the number of people in the area.

Action Taken: City Council:

1. Determined which of the highlighted Planning Commission ’s recommendations to include and directed the City Attorney to introduce and give first reading by title only, waiving further reading to the following ordinance entitled:

Ordinance No. O2M23-4823: AN ORDINANCE OF THE ALHAMBRA CITY COUNCIL ADOPTING ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT AMD-23-10, THE COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO THE CITY OF ALHAMBRA ZONING CODE (TITLE 23 OF THE ALHAMBRA MUNICIPAL CODE), AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENT AMD-23-09, AN AMENDMENT

TO THE CITY OF ALHAMBRA OFFICIAL ZONING MAP
which ordinance would return for a second reading and adoption at the next City Council meeting; and,

2. Determined which of the Planning Commission ’s highlighted recommendations to include and adopted the following Resolution entitled:

Resolution No. R2M23-54: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN TEXT AMENDMENT AMD-23-08, AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DESIGN CHAPTER OF THE CITY OF ALHAMBRA GENERAL PLAN, VISION 2040; GENERAL PLAN MAP AMENDMENT AMD-23-07, AN AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF ALHAMBRA GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP; AND ADOPTING THE INITIAL

STUDY/NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PROJECT PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA).
10 12-11 -2 3
Vote: Moved: ANDRADE-STADLER Seconded: LEE
Ayes: MALONEY, ANDRADE-STADLER, LEE, PÉREZ, MAZA
Noes : NONE

Absent: NONE
CONSENT AGENDA (Item Nos. 5 -24 )
All other items listed under the Consent Agenda were considered by the City Council to be routine and were enacted by one motion.

5. AWARD CONTRACT: PURCHASE OF WATER METERS – F2M23-6B, C2M23-91, M2M23- 199
Every year, the Utilities Department implements a water meter replacement program to replace broken, old, and inaccurate water meters throughout the City. Water meters are also required for new development and to complete meter installations for the Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) System. Replacement of water meters is critical to ensure meter accuracy for billing. At this time, staff need ed to order meters to place into inventory to enable the meter replacement program for the AMI system. The Sensus Flexnet System is utilized in Alhambra to read the water meters on a bi-monthly basis. Thirkettle Corporation dba Aqua-Metric Sales Company is the sole distributor in the State of California of Sensus Meters, which is the meter supported by the Sensus Flexnet AMI System.

Discussion : None
Action Taken: City Council award ed a contract, subject to final language approval by the City Manager and City Attorney, by and between the City of Alhambra and Thirkettle Corporation dba Aqua-Metric Sales Company, for the purchase of water meters and accessories in an amount not to exceed $250,000.00; and, direct ed staff to undertake the steps necessary to finalize Council ’s action. ( M2M23-199 ) Vote: Moved: PÉREZ Seconded: MALONEY
Ayes: MALONEY, ANDRADE-STADLER, LEE, PÉREZ, MAZA
Noes : NONE

Absent: NONE

6. CONTRACT AMENDMENT: ALMANSOR COURT EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT – F2M23-41, C2M23-46, M2M23-200
At the June 26, 2023, City Council meeting, Tom ’s Construction was awarded a contract to make improvements as part of the Almansor Court Exterior Improvements Project for $299,215.00. Staff received a request for change orders in the amount of $47,500.00 due to unforeseen additional work that was not included in the original agreement. The work included the following: repainting the metal/plastic rear glass section of the banquet hall; painting the top trim/crown and metal cap around the Almansor Court building; repairing rusted metal gates; replacing broken roof tile; painting of 6 metal bollards; and, removing and repour concrete in the path of travel areas. American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding was available to cover the additional cost associated with the change orders.

Discussion : None
11 12-11 -2 3
Action Taken: City Council approve d a contract amendment, subject to final language approval by the City Manager and City Attorney, to the contract with Tom ’s Construction (C2M23-46) for change orders, which increased $47,500.00 to the agreement not to exceed $346,715.00; and, direct ed staff to undertake the steps necessary to finalize the Council ’s action. ( M2M23-200 )
Vote: Moved: PÉREZ Seconded: MALONEY
Ayes: MALONEY, ANDRADE-STADLER, LEE, PÉREZ, MAZA
Noes : NONE

Absent: NONE

7. APPROVAL OF BUDGET AMENDMENT FOR STAFFING IN THE HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT – F2M23-17, F2M23-2, M2M23-201
City staff was recently informed about the planned retirement of the existing Executive Assistant in the Human Resources Department. When a vacancy in a position is created within a department, City staff will often take the opportunity to review and evaluate existing staffing structures. In this case, after reviewing, it was determined that the Department would most benefit from replacing the Executive Assistant position with a Confidential Management Analyst. Examples of the specialized responsibilities the Confidential Management Analyst – Human Resources would be tasked with include but are not limited to: monitoring and management of the City ’s liabilities claims, managing and tracking of the department ’s budgetary expenditures and contracts, assisting with workers compensation claims, utilization of best practices to limit City ’s exposure to liabilities and risk, and maintaining the City ’s property schedule with the City ’s existing insurance providers. Staff request ed the City Council approve an amendment to the FY 2023-2025 Adopted Budget to remove one Executive Assistant – Human Resources position and one part-time Human Resources Technician and add one Confidential Management Analyst – Human Resources position to the Human Resources Department.

Discussion : None
Action Taken: City Council took the following actions: 1) Approve d a budget amendment to remove one full-time Executive Assistant – Human Resources and one part- time Human Resources Technician and to add one full-time Confidential Management Analyst – Human Resources in the Human Resources Department; 2) Direct ed the Finance Director to move forward with the proposed budgetary amendments; and. 3) Direct ed staff to undertake the steps necessary to finalize the City Council ’s action. ( M2M23-201 ) Vote: Moved: PÉREZ Seconded: MALONEY
Ayes: MALONEY, ANDRADE-STADLER, LEE, PÉREZ, MAZA
Noes : NONE

Absent: NONE

8. AUTHORIZE RFP: CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION

SERVICES FOR PEDESTRIAN COUNTDOWN SIGNAL HEADS AT VARIOUS

SIGNALIZED INSTERSECTIONS THROUGHOUT THE CITY (FEDERALLY FUNDED PROJECT HSIP-5130(022)) – F2M23-73, RFP2M23-30
On November 13, 2023, the City Council approved the circulation of the Notice of Inviting Bids for construction of the Pedestrian Countdown Signal Head Systems Project at various intersections throughout the City (HSIP-5130(022)). Once installed, these signals would help pedestrians assess if there was sufficient time to cross the street. The project consist ed of 12 12-11 -2 3
installing countdown signal heads at various intersections throughout the City. Pursuant to the project, staff sought to distribute a Request for Proposals for Construction Management and Construction Inspection Services.

Public Comment: Lewis MCCAMMON, 105 N. Cordova, recommended utilizing the pedestrian head start feature on crosswalks.

Discussion : None
Action Taken: City Council authorize d the distribution of a Request for Proposals for Construction Management and Construction Inspection Services for the Pedestrian Countdown Signal Head at Various Signalized Intersections throughout the City (Federally Funded Project HSIP-5130(022)), with proposals due no later than 4:00 p.m. on January 18, 2024.

Vote: Moved: PÉREZ Seconded: MALONEY
Ayes: MALONEY, ANDRADE-STADLER, LEE, PÉREZ, MAZA
Noes : NONE

Absent: NONE

9. AWARD CONTRACT: PURCHASE OF MOTOROLA MOBILE RADIOS FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT – F2M23-6B, N2M23-128, C2M23-92, M2M23-202
On October 23, 2023, the City Council authorized the circulation of a Notice Inviting Bids for the purchase of Motorola mobile radios. The project will upgrade the City ’s fifty-seven Police Department mobile radios. On November 16, 2023, the City Clerk received one bid from Motorola Solutions, Inc. in the amount of $424,379.42. The bid includes the Los Angeles County discount of 27% for government agencies. Staff has reviewed the bid and found it is in full compliance and conformance with the bid specifications.

Discussion : None
Action Taken: City Council award ed a contract, subject to final language approval by the City Manager and City Attorney, to Motorola Solutions, Inc. in the amount of $424,379.42 for the purchase of Motorola radios; authorize d the Chief of Police to execute said agreement; and, direct ed staff to undertake the steps necessary to finalize Council ’s action. (M2M23-202 ) Vote: Moved: PÉREZ Seconded: MALONEY
Ayes: MALONEY, ANDRADE-STADLER, LEE, PÉREZ, MAZA
Noes : NONE

Absent: NONE

10. NOTICE OF COMPLETION: POLICE DEPARTMENT BUILDING ROOFING PROJECT – F2M23-43, C2M23-51, M2M23-203
On June 26, 2023, the City Council awarded a contract to Wiltshire Urethane Foam Company for the Police Department Building Roofing Project in the amount of $320,400.00. There was one change order in the amount of $20,500.00 to cover an additional 100 square feet of roof.

The existing rock roof was removed over the Motor ’s garage, and it was replaced with the current treatment. This project was inspected by staff and all work was completed in accordance with the City ’s requirements and specifications. As such, it was appropriate for the City Council to accept this project as complete and instruct that the Notice of Completion be filed with the County of Los Angeles Recorder ’s Office. 13 12-11 -2 3
Discussion : None
Action Taken: City Council accept ed the work of Wiltshire Urethane Foam Company for the repair and application of polyurethane foam sealer to the Police Department building roof as complete in the amount of $340,900.00; direct the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the County of Los Angeles for recordation; instruct ed the Finance Director to release the 5% retention 35 days from the date of recordation if no liens are filed; and, direct ed staff to undertake the steps necessary to finalize Council ’s action. ( M2M23-203 ) Vote: Moved: PÉREZ Seconded: MALONEY
Ayes: MALONEY, ANDRADE-STADLER, LEE, PÉREZ, MAZA
Noes : NONE

Absent: NONE

11. NOTICE OF COMPLETION: WELL NO. 12 PUMP REPLACEMENT – F2M23-57, C2M23- 56, M2M23-204
On July 24, 2023, the City Council awarded a contract to Tri County Pump Company for the Well No. 12 Pump Replacement in the amount of $103.663.80. There were no change orders authorized to complete the project. The project was completed in accordance with the City ’s requirements and specifications. As such, it was appropriate for the City Council to accept the project as complete and instruct the City Clerk that the Notice of Completion be filed with the County of Los Angeles Recorder ’s Office.

Discussion : None
Action Taken: Council accept ed the work of Tri County Pump Company for the Well No. 12 Pump Replacement as complete in the amount of $103,663.80; direct ed the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the County of Los Angeles for recordation; instruct ed the Finance Director to release the five percent retention 35 days from the date of recordation if no liens are filed, and, direct ed staff to undertake the steps necessary to finalize Council ’s action. ( M2M23-204 )
Vote: Moved: PÉREZ Seconded: MALONEY
Ayes: MALONEY, ANDRADE-STADLER, LEE, PÉREZ, MAZA
Noes : NONE

Absent: NONE

12. RESOLUTION APPROVING A REQUEST TO AMEND THE ALHAMBRA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ’S BYLAWS AND DETERMINE THIS ACTION IS EXEMPT FROM CEQA – F86- 191, F2M21-54, R2M23-57
The Alhambra Historical Society was founded in 1966 with the objective to encourage and promote the research and study of history and its relationship to the population and the development of Alhambra and the surrounding San Gabriel Valley. On September 28, 1992, the City Council adopted Resolution No. R92-46, in which the City assumed responsibility for operating the Alhambra Historical Society Museum and created the Museum ’s Board of Directors. The Alhambra Historical Museum displays a collection of artifacts related to the City of Alhambra ’s history housed in an eleven-room museum located at 1550 W Alhambra Road (corner of Alhambra Road and Bushnell Avenue). The Historical Society ’s bylaws were last amended on January 22, 1992. Pursuant to a 1992 agreement between the City and the Historical Society, any change to the by-laws requires City Council approval. On November 14 12-11 -2 3
6, 2023, the Historical Society submitted a draft of its proposed revised bylaws to the City Clerk ’s Office. Adopting the proposed resolution would approve the new by-laws and supersede any inconsistencies in the 1992 Agreement between the City and the Historical Society.

Discussion : None
Action Taken: City Council adopt ed Resolution No. R2M23-57 entitled: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Alhambra approving a request of the Alhambra Historical Society to amend its bylaws recommending that the Alhambra Historical Society ’s proposed bylaws be adopted and determine this action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act.

Vote: Moved: PÉREZ Seconded: MALONEY
Ayes: MALONEY, ANDRADE-STADLER, LEE, PÉREZ, MAZA
Noes : NONE

Absent: NONE

13. ACCEPT DONATION: ALHAMBRA CIVIC CENTER LIBRARY – F2M23-12, M2M23-205 Staff request ed that the City Council accept the gift of $10,000 from the Alhambra Public Library Foundation to be used to support the purchase of materials to be circulated via the Emery Park book locker and vending machine. The funds would be utilized to purchase books and materials in the three primary community languages for circulation. The book locker and vending machine would be purchased with grant funds from the State of California.

Discussion : None
Action Taken: City Council accept ed a $10,000 donation from the Alhambra Public Library Foundation to support the purchase of materials to be circulated via the Emery Park book locker and vending machine; appropriate d revenue and expenditure funds in the amount of $10,000; and, direct ed staff to undertake the steps necessary to finalize Council ’s action. (M2M23-205 )
Vote: Moved: PÉREZ Seconded: MALONEY
Ayes: MALONEY, ANDRADE-STADLER, LEE, PÉREZ, MAZA
Noes : NONE

Absent: NONE

14. ACCEPT DONATION: ALHAMBRA CIVIC CENTER LIBRARY 2024 SUMMER READING PROGRAM – F2M23-12, M2M23-206
Staff request ed that the City Council accept the gift of $27,000 from the Alhambra Public Library Foundation to be used to support the Library ’s 2024 Summer Reading Program. The generously donated funds would be used to provide marketing and outreach, books for giveaway, program incentives, a slate of programming by outside vendors, and programming refreshments.

Discussion : None
Action Taken: City Council accept ed a $27,000 donation from the Alhambra Public Library Foundation to support the Library ’s Annual Summer Reading Program; appropriate revenue and expenditure funds in the amount of $27,000; and, direct ed staff to undertake the 15 12-11 -2 3
steps necessary to finalize Council ’s action. ( M2M23-206 ) Vote: Moved: PÉREZ Seconded: MALONEY
Ayes: MALONEY, ANDRADE-STADLER, LEE, PÉREZ, MAZA
Noes : NONE

Absent: NONE

15. NOTICE INVITING BIDS: ALMANSOR GYMNASIUM WINDOW REPLACEMENT PROJECT – F2M23-77, N2M23-147
The original windows installed in 1951 reached the end of their usable life and need ed replacement. The Almansor gymnasium need ed double-pane energy-efficient windows to replace existing windows. Specifications and bid documentation were completed for the Almansor Gym Window Replacement Project. The project would include new windows and repair window closures. Bids would be due no later than 10:30 a.m. on January 25, 2024, in the office of the City Clerk and would be opened at 11:00 a.m. that same day.

Discussion : None
Action Taken: City Council authorize d staff to circulate a Notice Inviting Bids to prospective contractors for the Almansor Gymnasium Window Replacement Project; and, direct ed staff to undertake the steps necessary to finalize Council ’s action.

Vote: Moved: PÉREZ Seconded: MALONEY
Ayes: MALONEY, ANDRADE-STADLER, LEE, PÉREZ, MAZA
Noes : NONE

Absent: NONE

16. CONTRACT AMENDMENT: LAND MANAGEMENT AND PERMITTING SOFTWARE SYSTEM – F2M18-21, C2M18-60, M2M23-208
In 2018, the City Council awarded a contract to Tyler Technologies, Inc. for the development of a new land management and permitting software system. Tyler Technologies developed a custom system for Alhambra that officially launched in 2020. The online system has provide d 24/7 access to property information and provides the public the ability to apply for, pay, and receive permits online. On December 12, 2022, the City Council approved a one-year contract Amendment with Tyler Technologies, Inc. to provide a “client services account manager ” through the Energov Assist Complete program. The City has benefited from the program by completing required configuration changes and strategic planning for system updates. The City ’s land management software has undergone several configuration improvements over the last year and can benefit from additional modifications related to process streamlining and future upgrades. Staff requested the City Council approve a Second Amendment for an additional 3 years, through November 30, 2026, to align with the master contract for the overall Tyler online permitting system.

Discussion : None
Action Taken: City Council approve d a Second Amendment, subject to final language approval by the City Manager and City Attorney, with Tyler Technologies, Inc. for an additional 3 years through November 2026 in an amount not to exceed $264,810 for account management services related to the City ’s land management and permitting software system; and, direct ed staff to undertake the steps necessary to finalize the Council ’s action. (M2M23- 208 )
16 12-11 -2 3
Vote: Moved: PÉREZ Seconded: MALONEY
Ayes: MALONEY, ANDRADE-STADLER, LEE, PÉREZ, MAZA
Noes : NONE

Absent: NONE

17. CONSIDERATION OF A SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE DISPOSITION AND

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (DDA) WITH AMERICAN FAMILY HOUSING FOR A PROPOSED 50 UNIT AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT IN DOWNTOWN ALHAMBRA – F2M19-39, R2M20-40, M2M23-209
In November 2020, the City Council approved a DDA with American Family Housing to build a 50-unit affordable housing project on a City owned parcel currently used as a surface parking lot in the downtown district between 1 st and 2 nd Streets, south of Main Street between Rick ’s and the AT&T building. In January 2022, the City Council approved a First Amendment to the DDA clarifying 29 public parking spaces. Since then, the City granted AFH several extensions (first, to November 15, 2022, then to December 30, 2022, then to August 31, 2023 and finally to November 30, 2023) to obtain all necessary funding for constructing the project. To date, AFH made several efforts to obtain financing. In 2022, AFH was awarded 4% tax credits from the State; however, they returned the allocation due to rising construction costs, and applied for larger tax credit allocations. In 2023 AFH applied for 9% State tax credits but were not successful in receiving funding from the State. Moving forward in 2024, AFH ’s plan is to reapply for 4% tax credit with the State and also partnering with Los Angeles County to increase the County ’s share of funding towards the project. As a result, a Second Amendment to the DDA was presented to update the terms including but not limited to: Time: Extending the DDA financing deadline to 8/31/2024 (if financing is not obtained, City may terminate the DDA.); Partnership: Reassign the partner from National Core to VP Mariposa LLC; and, Construction timeline: The construction time frame would be increased from 16 months to 20 months. Subsequently, once AFH could obtain additional County funding and State Tax Credits, a Third Amendment would be brought back for the Council to consider that would reflect the new funding sources and revise the unit counts from 25 units to 35 units of extremely low-income units and from 24 units to 14 low-income units as a result of the funding sources.

Public Comment: Lewis MCCAMMON, 105 N. Cordova, stated that he was glad to see the project moving forward and discussed the City ’s RHNA requirements in regards to the Bob Wondries site.

Discussion : None
Action Taken: City Council approve d a Second Amendment, subject to final language approval by the City Manager and City Attorney, to the Disposition and Loan Development Agreement (DDA) with American Family Housing (AFH); and, direct ed staff to undertake the steps necessary to finalize the Council ’s action, including, but not limited to the execution and recordation of all documents contemplated by the DDA . (M2M23-209 ) Vote: Moved: PÉREZ Seconded: MALONEY
Ayes: MALONEY, ANDRADE-STADLER, LEE, PÉREZ, MAZA
Noes : NONE

Absent: NONE

18. RESOLUTION: AUTHORIZATION TO ENTER INTO AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD – F2M23-16, R2M23-56
17 12-11 -2 3
California Revenue and Taxation Code (R&TC) Section 19551.1 authorizes the reciprocal exchange of limited tax information between a city and FTB. R&TC Section 19551.5 mandates cities provide city business licensing and tax information to FTB upon request. FTB recommend ed the City adopt a resolution executing the reciprocal agreement between FTB and the City of Alhambra. The data exchange would help FTB find businesses who d id not file income tax returns, and it would help the City identify unlicensed businesses within the jurisdiction. There were no costs to either party for the reciprocal agreement; it would assist, however, with generating more business license revenues.

Discussion : None
Action Taken: City Council adopt ed Resolution No. R2M23-56 entitled: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Alhambra authorizing the City Manager to execute Agreement with the State of California Franchise Tax Board authorizing the City Manager to execute a reciprocal agreement with the State of California Franchise Tax Board (FTB) for the exchange of tax data between the FTB and the City specific to City business license information for tax administration purposes; and, direct ed staff to undertake the steps necessary to finalize Council ’s action.

Vote: Moved: PÉREZ Seconded: MALONEY
Ayes: MALONEY, ANDRADE-STADLER, LEE, PÉREZ, MAZA
Noes : NONE

Absent: NONE

19. RESOLUTION APPROVING CHANGES TO THE CITY OF ALHAMBRA COMPENSATION

PLAN AND SALARY SCHEDULE FOR PART-TIME JOB CLASSIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL OF A PART-TIME FIRE PARAMEDIC INTERN CLASS SPECIFICATION – F2M23-3, R2M23-55, M2M23-210
California Public Employees ’ Retirement Law requires the City Council to approve and adopt salary schedules and pay rates for job classifications at a public meeting. Effective January 1, 2024, the State of California Department of Industrial Relations Minimum Wage Order mandates that minimum wage for employers with 26 or more employees, increase from $15.50 per hour to $16.00 per hour. The proposed Resolution provide d for salary increases for part- time hourly classifications to ensure compliance with the upcoming State of California mandated minimum wage increase. Additionally, the proposed Resolution include d the class specification for a part-time Fire Paramedic Intern for Council ’s approval. In staff ’s continued efforts to identify and develop opportunities to recruit and attract sworn Firefighter/Paramedics to the Fire Department, a new part-time class specification entitled Fire Paramedic Intern was created. To qualify as a part-time Fire Paramedic Intern, a candidate must be an existing Fire Cadet within the Fire Department ’s Cadet Program. This position would allow a limited number of candidates within our Fire Cadet program to be compensated at a part-time hourly rate while attending Paramedic school and training within the Fire Department ’s Cadet Program.

Public Comment: Lewis MCCAMMON, 105 N. Cordova, discussed the proposed compensation for the City ’s part-time employees as compared to fast food minimum wage jobs and noted that if the budget allow ed , the City should increase compensation w h ere possible.

Discussion : Vice Mayor PÉREZ discussed the City ’s challenges with filling vacant positions and requested a future City Council discussion regarding employee compensation.

Councilmember ANDRADE-STADLER reiterated the comments by Ms. PÉREZ , noted the high cost of living in California , and supported bringing back a future discussion regarding employee compensation.
18 12-11 -2 3
Action Taken: City Council adopt ed Resolution No. R2M23-55 entitled: A Resolution of the Alhambra City Council approving changes to the City of Alhambra Compensation Plan and Salary Schedule for part-time job classifications and approval of part-time Fire Paramedic Intern Class Specification ; and, direct ed the Finance Director to make necessary budget adjustments within the Fiscal Year 2023-24 and 2024-25 adopted budget to comply with the State mandated minimum wage increase and to enable the hiring of part-time Fire Paramedic Interns. ( M2M23-210 )
Vote: Moved: PÉREZ Seconded: MALONEY
Ayes: MALONEY, ANDRADE-STADLER, LEE, PÉREZ, MAZA
Noes : NONE

Absent: NONE

20. CONTRACT AMENDMENT: PURCHASE OF A TORO GROUNDMASTER RIDING MOWER – F2M21-6A, C2M21-52, M2M23-211
At the September 27, 2021, City Council meeting, Turf Star Western Inc. was awarded a contract to purchase a Toro Groundmaster Riding Mower for $84,606.66. Due to supply chain issues the mower was on order but was not available for delivery. On November 8, 2023, staff received the revised surcharge price increase invoice from Turf Star Western Inc. for $95,801.96 as a “materials surcharge ”. The original contract award was based on piggyback pricing through Sourcewell . The new piggyback pricing include d the surcharge as delineated in the attached quote.

Discussion : None
Action Taken: City Council approve d a contract amendment, subject to final language approval by the City Manager and City Attorney, to the contract with Turf Star Western Inc. (C2M21-52) for the purchase of one Toro Groundmaster riding mower, which will increase $11,195.30 to the agreement not to exceed $95,801.96; and, direct ed staff to undertake the steps necessary to finalize the Council ’s action. (M2M23-211 ) Vote: Moved: PÉREZ Seconded: MALONEY
Ayes: MALONEY, ANDRADE-STADLER, LEE, PÉREZ, MAZA
Noes : NONE

Absent: NONE

21. AWARD CONTRACT: COMMUNITY RISK REDUCTION BILLING SERVICES – F2M23-71, RFP2M23-26, C2M23-93, M2M23-213
On October 23, 2023, the City Council approved the distribution of a Request for Proposals (RPF) for Community Risk Reduction (CRR) billing services. There were two proposals received. Staff reviewed and evaluated the proposals based on the requirements of the RFP which included qualifications, experience, costs, approach, references, and quality. Wittman Enterprises, LLC was determined as best suited for the City ’s needs and proposed the lowest rate. The term of the proposed agreement with Wittman would be for three years, effective January 1, 2024, and would renew on January 1, 2027 for two terms of one-year each pursuant to satisfactory performance.

Discussion : None
19 12-11 -2 3
Action Taken: City Council award ed a contract, subject to final language approval by the City Manager and City Attorney, to Wittman Enterprises, LLC for billing services for a three- year period with an option for two (2) one-year contract extensions; authorize d the City Manager to execute the extensions if the services are satisfactory; authorize d the City Manager or designee to execute the necessary documents; and, direct ed staff to undertake the steps necessary to finalize Council ’s action. ( M2M23-213 ) Vote: Moved: PÉREZ Seconded: MALONEY
Ayes: MALONEY, ANDRADE-STADLER, LEE, PÉREZ, MAZA
Noes : NONE

Absent: NONE

22. PERSONNEL ACTIONS – F2M23-2
Discussion : None
Action Taken: City Council ratif ied the actions of the City Manager set forth in that certain Personnel Actions document dated December 11, 2023 showing the various appointments, classifications, salary changes, etc., since the last City Council meeting.

Vote: Moved: PÉREZ Seconded: MALONEY
Ayes: MALONEY, ANDRADE-STADLER, LEE, PÉREZ, MAZA
Noes : NONE

Absent: NONE

23. DEMANDS - F2M23-1
Discussion : None
Action Taken: City Council approve d as submitted Final Check List (243000 thru 243002) in the amount of $76,126.90 for the period ending September 21, 2023 and Schedule of Wire Transfers in the amount of $1,695,140.75 for the week ending September 15, 2023; Final Check List (8697 thru 8720) in the amount of $1,182.50 for the period ending September 26, 2023; Final Check List (243003 thru 243147) in the amount of $1,659,647.40 for the period ending September 28, 2023 and Schedule of Wire Transfers in the amount of $25,000.00 for the week ending September 22, 2023; Final Check List (243148 thru 243148) in the amount of $181.06 for the period ending September 28, 2023; Final Check List (243149 thru 243319) in the amount of $61,901.92 for the period ending October 3, 2023 and Schedule of Wire Transfers in the amount of $2,096,832.31 for the week ending September 29, 2023; and, Final Check List (243320 thru 243446) in the amount of $664,652.17 for the period ending October 5, 2023.

Vote: Moved: PÉREZ Seconded: MALONEY
Ayes: MALONEY, ANDRADE-STADLER, LEE, PÉREZ, MAZA
Noes : NONE

Absent: NONE

24. ADOPTION OF AN URGENCY ORDINANCE REGULATING MEDICINAL CANNABIS DELIVERY-ONLY RETAILERS – F2M23-78, O2M23-4824, M2M23-207 The California Legislature adopted Senate Bill 1886 (“SB 1186 ”) in 2022, entitled the Medicinal Cannabis Patients ’ Right of Access Act, which precludes cities and counties from adopting or 20 12-11 -2 3
enforcing regulations that prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the retail sale of medicinal cannabis by delivery. SB 1186 takes effect on January 1, 2024. SB 1186 allows cities and counties to adopt and enforce reasonable regulations on the retail sale by delivery of medicinal cannabis, including zoning requirements. Adoption of the permanent regulations must occur after the adoption of the new Zoning Code. The City Council opened the public hearing on the adoption of the Zoning Code update on November 13, 2023, and the matter was still under consideration by the Council. An ordinance establishing permanent regulations on medicinal cannabis delivery-only retailers was presented to the Planning Commission at its November 20, 2023 meeting and the Commission recommended Council adoption of that ordinance. The proposed urgency ordinance contain ed the same substantive regulations that were presented to the Planning Commission in the draft permanent ordinance. If the urgency ordinance was not adopted, the City w ould not have regulations in place by January 1, 2024. As of that date, the City ’s prohibition on medicinal cannabis delivery-only retailers w ould be unenforceable, and without regulations on such businesses in place a business of this kind could locate anywhere in the City, and the City would have no regulations in place to govern their location and operation.

The proposed ordinance would allow a delivery-only retailer of medicinal cannabis to be a conditionally permitted use in the Industrial zone. The retailer must only sell medicinal cannabis; the retail sale of adult-use (e.g., recreational) cannabis would remain prohibited. As a delivery-only business, there would be no storefront operations (no walk-in customers). The proposed ordinance also include d separation requirements for such businesses. A conditional use permit for a medicinal cannabis delivery-only retailer cannot be issued for any parcel that is within 600 feet of a school, park, licensed daycare facility, youth center, or licensed drug or alcohol rehabilitation facility, or within 1,000 feet of any parcel where another medicinal cannabis delivery-only retailer is operating. The ordinance also propose d that an annual business regulatory permit be required for such businesses. The proposed ordinance include d operational standards for these businesses. These include d security requirements, odor control measures, and a requirement that product not be visible from the exterior of the property. Failure to comply with the operational requirements could result in the regulatory permit being suspended, revoked or not renewed.

Discussion : None
Action Taken: City Council, by one motion, t ook the following actions:

1. Adopt ed by a 4/5 vote of the City Council the following urgency ordinance entitled:

Ordinance No. O2M23-4824 : An Urgency Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Alhambra, California enacted pursuant to California Government Code Sections 36937 and 65858 adopting an interim Urgency Ordinance to Implement California Law governing medicinal cannabis delivery-only retailers within the City
after which such ordinance went into effect immediately; and,

2. Direct ed staff to set a public hearing on an extension of the urgency ordinance (O2M23-4824) for the January 22, 2024 regular City Council meeting; and,

3. Direct ed staff to set a public hearing on the ordinance establishing permanent regulations on medicinal cannabis delivery-only retailers for the January 22, 2024 regular City Council meeting. ( M2M23-207 )
Vote: Moved: PÉREZ Seconded: MALONEY
Ayes: MALONEY, ANDRADE-STADLER, LEE, PÉREZ, MAZA
Noes : NONE

Absent: NONE
21 12-11 -2 3
PUBLIC COMMENT FOR NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS – F2M2 3 -4
1) Connie CERVANTES, 2038 South 2nd St., expressed concerns with the height limit of potential buildings on Hellman Ave . and Garfield Ave. and requested parking restrictions on 2 nd Street due to the number of cars that park the re to u tilize the nearby businesses.

Director of Community Development HO clarified the height limits that the Council adopted. 2) Jennifer NG, S. Cordova St., discussed the height requirements of the East Main Corridor, discussed protecting potential historic properties in the City, stated that S. Cordova St. is in need of a crosswalk to increase pedestrian safety , and thanked the Council, Planning Commission, and staff for their work on the zoning code update.
3) Lewis MCCAMMON, 105 N. Cordova St., discussed the new potential housing opportunities due to the changes in the zoning code updates, stated that there needs to be clarification with the border of the Central Business District and East Main Corridor in the area between Chapel Ave. and Almansor St. , and s uggested reviewing the housing element again during its mid-term review in 2025. 4) Olga ALARID, via Zoom, wished Councilmember ANDRADE-STADLER speedy recovery and expressed concern with potential 4-story and 5-story height requirements .

Public Comments submitted via Email and on file in the City Clerk ’s office : Jonathan HAWES requested the Council to pass a resolution condemning the crimes and schemes and protecting El Monte Mayor Jessica Ancona.

COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (ANNOUNCEMENTS & FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS) – F2M2 3 -7 Councilmember LEE thanked the Council and public for their h ard work on the zoning code updates and wished a Merry Christmas to everyone.

Councilmember MALONEY expressed appreciation for everyone ’s participation in the zoning code updates , wished everyone a Happy Holidays, and discussed the life of former Alhambra Mayor Stephen Sham.

Vice Mayor PÉREZ requested staff to follow-up with the parking issues on 2 nd Street that were referenced by Ms. Cervantes , wished everyone Happy Holidays, and expressed her condolences for former Mayor Stephen Sham.

Mayor MAZA discussed the memorial of former Mayor Stephen Sham, wished everyone a Happy Holidays, expressed appreciation that the Council was able to get through the zoning code updates, noted the holiday schedule for the Farmer ’s Market, highlighted the Fire Department ’s toy drive, discussed an upcoming Housing Clinic at the public library, noted that the City is looking for volunteers to decorate the City ’s Rose Parade Float, and noted that he would adjourn the meeting in memory of former Alhambra Mayor Stephen Sham.

ADJOURNMENT: At 11 :42 p.m. there being no further business for the Council to transact, the Mayor, with the consent of the City Council, adjourned their meeting , in memory of former Alhambra Mayor Stephen Sham, to the next regul ar meeting of the Alhambra City Council scheduled for Monday, January 8 , 202 4 at 6:00 p.m .

LAUREN MYLES, CMC

CITY CLERK

← All documents from this meeting