Agenda, regular meeting — Alhambra City Council, August 25, 2025 (part 4 of 4)

feature that is either a contributing characteristic of the resource or visible from any public right - of-way; alter, restore, reconstruct, demolish, remove, replace, or relocate any permanent sign visible from a public right-of-way; or alter, restore, reconstruct, demolish, remove, replace, or relocate any interior characteristic that was identified as contributing during the designation without being granted a certificate of appropriateness, except as provided under division 6 of this article. Approval of such work shall be required even if no other permits or entitlements are required by the city. Procedures are set forth in section 17-142 for the granting of a certificate of appropriateness in cases of substantial economic hardship.

(b) Minor alterations. The commission may, by resolution, adopt a list of those types of alterations that are subject to approval of a certificate of appropriateness that are deemed to be "minor" in nature. The commission may modify the list of minor alterations from time to time by resolution as circumstances warrant. Applications for certificates of appropriateness involving only minor alterations shall be reviewed pursuant to procedures in section 17-142(e).

23. Economic hardship provision? Significant documentation required such as real estate taxes from prior 2 years, annual debt service, assessed land value, estimate from an architect, reports, etc.

24. Does the City administer Mills Act
contracts?
Yes

25. Other available incentives? State Historic Building Code, fee relief, setback flexibility, relief from non-conforming parking requirements, recognition, and financial benefits

ATTACHMENT 7
Security Awareness Learn more
Report Email Trust Email
The email came from an external source.

From: Philip Chan
To: Alhambra Historic Preservation
Subject: 1719 S. Second Ave Alhambra
Date: Wednesday, May 29, 2024 9:24:37 AM
Attachments: attachment-1.png
attachment-2.png
attachment-3.png
Hi,

The property at 1719 S. Second Ave Alhambra is listed on the draft historic resources survey. It is listed under ‘local’ resources.

If we have another survey by another historian with a more in depth study of the property proofing that is not historical significant, are we about to obtain a demolition of the property now?

What is the procedure for demolition the property for new construction?

Please advise.

Thanks,

Philip K. Chan AIA | Architect

PDS Studio Inc.

Architecture + Design
711 S. First Ave, Arcadia, CA 91006
o-626-294-9402 c-626-524-2901

From: Squarespace
To: Alhambra Historic Preservation
Subject: Form Submission - Contact Us
Date: Friday, May 31, 2024 12:27:26 PM
Sent via form submission from City of Alhambra Historic Preservation Program Name: Elsa Y.

Email: [email protected]
Message: While cleaning I found a couple framed photos and I realized they were photos of Alhambra in the 19th-20th century. I don't believe they are originals, but I wanted to run them by you in case they were of interest. Let me know and I can send some photos over for confirmation. Thanks.

Manage Submissions
Does this submission look like spam? Report it here.

Security Awareness Learn more
Report Email Trust Email
The email came from an external source.

From: Stephanie Hodal
To: Alhambra Historic Preservation
Subject: Quest re Context Statement and Resource Survey Date: Thursday, August 15, 2024 12:55:03 PM
Attachments: attachment-1.png
attachment-2.png
attachment-3.png
I am completing a Cultural Resource Study for a property in Ramona Park and am referencing the recently completed Context Statement and Resource Survey.

On your website the two documents are listed as final. Have they also been adopted by the city as the official final documents?

Thanks for letting me know.

Stephanie.

Stephanie C. Hodal
Cultural Resources Planner

SAN FRANCISCO | SAN JOSE | LOS ANGELES | SACRAMENTO

523 W. 6th Street, Suite 1013, Los Angeles, California 90013 213.537.1025 (direct) | 213.221.1200 (main) | 617.417.7924 (mobile) [email protected] | www.page-turnbull.com

We imagine change in historic and contemporary environments to cultivate thriving, sustainable, and resilient communities.

Security Awareness Learn more
Report Email Trust Email
The email came from an external source.

The email was sent from a personal email address.

From: Grace W Hurd
To: Siva, Yalini; Alhambra Historic Preservation
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Fwd: Historic Preservation Program CORRECTIION RE PHONE NUMBER Date: Saturday, September 14, 2024 1:29:14 PM
Attachments: attachment-1.png
attachment-2.png
attachment-3.png
attachment-4.png
attachment-5.png
Hello Ms. Siva,
My telephone number for return call is 626-716-6439. Correcting typo in previous email.

Thank you.

Grace
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Grace W Hurd <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, Sep 11, 2024, 8:38 PM
Subject: Re: Historic Preservation Program
To: <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>, Frederick Hurd <[email protected]> Subject: St. Therese Church - Alhambra & Architectural Style Hello,
Thank you for sending this to me. I grew up in Alhambra and lived there from approx. 1969-79 and I attended St. Therese School on Vega and Alhambra Road. My husband and I are still parishioners at St. Therese Church, although we now live in Pasadena. However, my family no longer owns property in Alhambra, having sold my father's house on No. Stoneman in 2015.

I think perhaps you sent this to me because I listed St. Therese Church when you were first circulating paperwork regarding historic consideration for Alhambra. I write now, along with my husband, to say that we are surprised to see that St. Therese Church is described as "Spanish Colonial Revival" style of architecture. It is also described as "20th Century Revival", which makes no sense. If it was erected in the 20th Century, it cannot be 20th Century revival. It's just 20th Century.

It is obvious to us that St. Therese’s most prominent architectural style is Art Deco as evidenced by its sleek modernism, the date of its construction, the background of the architect, the prominent Art Deco frieze on the facade and the overall geometric design of the tower. So many features on the interior, as well, point to Art Deco, to include the horizontal design, height and fabulous use of light, geometric design, the overall feeling of lightness and the subtle attention to detail, all which point to a church dedicated to a French female saint (including the fleur-de-lis pattern on the wall behind the altar).

The noted architectural elements of asymmetrical facade, irregular plan and horizontal massing, varied gable or hipped roofs with clay barrel tiles, plaster veneered exterior walls, arcades or colonnades, balconies, decorative grilles of wood, wrought iron or plaster are not unique to Spanish Colonial Revival architecture alone, but can be found in many architectural styles, including Art Deco, which gained prominence the 1920's and 30's and got its name from the 1925 International Exhibition of Modern Decorative and Industrial Arts held in Paris.

If we look at the façade of the Church of St. Charles Borromeo in North Hollywood (1959) also by J. Earl Trudeau, perhaps here, we see Spanish Colonial Revival, but that is a very different design of church than St. Therese. Here, the architect set out to do something Spanish. At St.

Therese, he set out to do something French and 20th Century, which is the Art Deco style.

I also cannot help looking at the Carmelite Convent at Alhambra Road without acknowledging how similar it is to the convent where St. Therese lived in Lisieux. Although it is a different time period and a different architect, I think it is evident that the Carmelites hoped to recreate St.

Therese in Alhambra through the architecture of the convent and the church. Other considerations might be the prominence and popularity of St. Therese following her canonization, especially during the late 1940's/early 50's.

St. Therese is open and filled with light, expressing the language of Art Deco. It is a modern church design. This was the feeling I had and the words I would have used, had I known them, upon entering St. Therese Church for the first time in 1969 as a 12-year-old child. It had such an impact on me. I was glad my family had found such a wonderful church.

For your consideration.

Sincerely,

Graceann Weigel Hurd (Grace) & Frederick Hurd
On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 3:45 PM Alhambra Historic Preservation <[email protected]> wrote:

Security Awareness Learn more
Report Email Trust Email
The email came from an external source.

The email was sent from a personal email address.

From: Joanna
To: Alhambra Historic Preservation; Siva, Yalini
Subject: Historic Preservation Program - Question
Date: Monday, September 16, 2024 9:23:50 AM
Attachments: attachment-1.png
attachment-2.png
Hello,
I received a letter in the mail regarding the Historic Preservation Program, which states that my property (1221-1223 S Palm Avenue, Alhambra CA 91803) is listed on the Historic Resources survey.

I just purchased this property several months ago, and do NOT want the house listed as a historic home. Is there a way to remove this property from the list of potential historic homes? Thank you for your help.

Joanna
From: P.J. Guida
To: Alhambra Historic Preservation
Subject: Re: Historic Preservation Program - District 3 Community Meeting: October 9 @ 6 p.m.

Date: Thursday, September 26, 2024 11:49:39 PM
Thank you very much for the information and hosting this important meeting.

We are traveling at the moment and will not be able to attend. Please keep us posted and updated on any news for district 3. I assure you that if we were in town-we would make a vocal presence.

We have been especially interested in short-term rentals - creating an ongoing concern. As well, these same owners have made additions (ADUs) that do not conform to the architectural design and standards of this historic area. A complete disregard for preservation of the neighborhood.

I have written several times to the city manager and made complaints to the online rental companies.

We need help with these issues- we’re losing our neighborhood - its becoming a hotel zone.

Sincerely,
P.J. Guida
626-695-1278
On Sep 27, 2024, at 1:30 AM, Alhambra Historic Preservation <[email protected]> wrote:

attachment-1.png>

Security Awareness Learn more
Report Email Trust Email
The email came from an external source.

The email was sent from a personal email address.

From: armando macedo
To: Alhambra Historic Preservation
Subject: Historic Preservation Program
Date: Wednesday, October 2, 2024 4:24:33 PM
Attachments: attachment-1.png
attachment-2.png
To Whom It May Concern,
My wife and I own the home located at 436 N. Almansor St in Alhambra, which has been designated as a historic home.

We would like to know if your organizatioon can provide any guidance with respect to a home addition project we're contemplating.

Thank you,
Armando Macedo
[email protected]
626-222-9412
Security Awareness Learn more
Report Email Trust Email
The email came from an external source.

From: Jocelyne Rojas
To: Alhambra Historic Preservation
Subject: Please specify address- Historic Preservation Program/Phase 3 CITY OF ALHAMBRA Date: Wednesday, October 2, 2024 7:56:35 AM
Attachments: attachment-2.png
attachment-3.png
Historic Preservation ProgramPhase 3 CITY OF ALHAMBRA.pdf Good morning!
We are an organization that manages 100 plus churches, and we received this letter in the mail a couple of weeks ago..

I would like to know if you can help me by specifying to which our churches/property this notice pertains to?
See attached.

Thank you!
Jocelyne Rojas
Executive Assistant
to Chris Jordan,
Asset and Risk Management Director
Southern California Conference
of Seventh-day Adventists
1535 E. Chevy Chase Dr.

Glendale, CA 91206
818-546-8407 Ext: 419
[email protected]
scc.adventist.org

Security Awareness Learn more
Report Email Trust Email
The email came from an external source.

The email was sent from a personal email address.

From: Tiffany Zhong
To: Alhambra Historic Preservation
Cc: Caleb To
Subject: Question on Alhambra Historic Preservation Program Date: Monday, October 7, 2024 6:59:49 PM
Attachments: attachment-1.png
attachment-2.png
Hello Yalini,
I received mail regarding the District 3 Community Meeting being held this Wed, Oct 9.

Unfortunately, I won't be able to attend, but I would love to review the presentation on historic preservation ordinances to learn more. Would you be able to send me the presentation? Thank you!
Best regards,
Tiffany Zhong
Security Awareness Learn more
Report Email Trust Email
The email came from an external source.

The email was sent from a personal email address.

From: Yi Nicholson
To: Alhambra Historic Preservation
Subject: Council District 5 Zoom Meeting
Date: Monday, October 7, 2024 10:12:30 AM
Attachments: attachment-1.png
attachment-2.png
Morning -
I missed the Oct. 2, 2024 Zoom Meeting. On the website, it says I can find a recording of that meeting. Can you please direct me to it as I do not see it on the website.

Thank you.

Best,
Yi Nicholson
Security Awareness Learn more
Report Email Trust Email
The email came from an external source.

The email was sent from a personal email address.

From: Adele Andrade Stadler
To: Alhambra Historic Preservation
Subject: Historical road
Date: Tuesday, October 15, 2024 3:31:21 PM
Attachments: attachment-1.png
attachment-2.png
road.jpg
Please make sure roads are looked at too.

Sincerely
Adele Andrade Stadler

Security Awareness Learn more
Report Email Trust Email
The email came from an external source.

The email was sent from a personal email address.

From: Kimberly Clark
To: Siva, Yalini
Subject: Historic Preservation ordinance
Date: Thursday, October 17, 2024 3:31:48 PM
Attachments: attachment-1.png
attachment-2.png
I'm interested to know where I can find the map showing the proposed Landmark designations and future potential designations and historic district for district 4. Please provide link as soon as possible.

We would appreciate it so much.

Thank you.

Security Awareness Learn more
Report Email Trust Email
The email came from an external source.

The email was sent from a personal email address.

From: Steven Li
To: Alhambra Historic Preservation
Subject: We reject list our property on the Historic Preservation List Date: Friday, October 18, 2024 9:30:42 PM
Attachments: attachment-1.png
attachment-2.png
Dear Yalinni Siva:

My name is Steven Li and my wife name is HongYan FangLi, our property is at 19 W.

Pine Street, Alabama, CA 91801. We strong oppose to put our property on the Historic Preservation List. We believe the Alhambra city authority might save this money and put it on the public safety, for instance, the intersection in front of my property( the W. Pine and N.

Atlantic Blvd.)has traffic collapsed once a month. Moreover, we have observed vehicles drive over speed limite(especially during morning traffic rushing hours)and run over red lights everyday. The city should install traffic/speed cameras and enforce the law more strictly. It is not only good for public safety but is also great source to generate the income for the city revenue.

Thank you very much
Yours sincerely
Steven Li and HongYan FangLi
My Cell Phone: 415-987-3027

Security Awareness Learn more
Report Email Trust Email
The email came from an external source.

The email was sent from a personal email address.

From: Thanos Trezos
To: Alhambra Historic Preservation
Cc: McCurley, Maia; Kaly Trezos; Marina Trezos
Subject: Re: Historic Preservation Ordinance
Date: Tuesday, October 22, 2024 11:46:41 PM
Attachments: attachment-2.png
attachment-3.png
Ordinance impact.xlsx
Oops! See correct table
Thanos Trezos
On Tuesday, October 22, 2024 at 11:28:35 PM PDT, Thanos Trezos <[email protected]> wrote:

Dear Yalini Siva,
I own property at N. Story Place and fully support the creation of a Historic Preservation Ordinance. I’ve attended the two in-person meetings, and while I am generally in favor, I still have some concerns and questions about the potential impacts of the ordinance on my property and the City as a whole.

I would greatly appreciate it if you could address my questions below or, alternatively, if the City’s consultants could provide clarification during the upcoming online meetings for phase 3 of the program:
1. In Appendix D (pages 952-1116) of the Historic Resources Survey Report, properties within the proposed historic districts are classified as either contributing or non- contributing. For non-contributing properties, two of the listed reasons are “Significantly Altered” and “Extensively Altered.” Could you clarify the difference between these two classifications? What are some examples of alterations that would qualify as “significant” versus “extensive”? Specifically, what are the “significant alterations” noted for the property located at 509 N. Story Place? 2. The Discussion Draft of the Historic Preservation Ordinance defines “major alterations” and “minor alterations” using subjective terms like “significant features” and “insignificant features.” How might these classifications impact specific projects that homeowners may want to undertake on their properties? Can the ordinance specify a maximum time frame for delays that homeowners might face as a result of the ordinance? Furthermore, how does the ordinance affect properties located either inside or outside the boundaries of historic districts? What is the impact on non- contributing, contributing, or individually eligible properties within a historic district? For reference, I have attached a table of potential projects, and I kindly request that you provide feedback on each scenario.

I look forward to your response. Should you need further information or wish to discuss anything in detail, please feel free to contact me at (626) 787-4757.

Sincerely,
Thanos Trezos
Ordinary house Individually eligible house Non-contributor house Contributor house Not visible from the street
Bathroom remodeling
Kitchen remodeling
Windows replacement
Painting interior
Painting exterior
Install new AC
Replace floors
Room addition
Construct ADU
Upgrade electrical Service
Visible from the street
Replace roof
Replace driveway
Install solar panels
Painting exterior
Windows replacement
Add/remove trees
Within the boundaries of an hist Outside historic district boundariesPotential Project Individually Eligible house
toric District
Ordinary house Individually eligible house Non-contributor house Contributor house Not visible from the street
Bathroom remodeling
Kitchen remodeling
Windows replacement
Painting interior
Painting exterior
Install new AC
Replace floors
Room addition
Construct ADU
Upgrade electrical Service
Visible from the street
Replace roof
Replace driveway
Install solar panels
Painting exterior
Windows replacement
Add/remove trees
Within the boundaries of an hist Outside historic district boundariesPotential Project Individually Eligible house
toric District
From: Kimberly Clark
To: McCurley, Maia
Subject: Re: Historic Preservation ordinance
Date: Wednesday, October 23, 2024 12:42:57 PM
Who are you McCurley and or Maia. So far from what I read from the draft is quite concerning.

Especially that with this ordinance that will pass because of the Measure V. That it looks to put the City of Alhambra on the property deeds for 10 years. Then it will automatically renew forever. Until a petition is filed by the owner to cancel the Mills act. contract with the city.

Idea, before the Mills act contract is signed by the City, why not have a signed " release of property back to owner, on said date (10 year anniversary). Cancellation of the Mills act. At the same time. 10 years is a long time. Anything can happen. I haven't found anything that will allow an owner to refinance his home or use it as collateral for a loan in case of a financial emergency if property is under the Mills act.

I hope Alhambra will point this out in the next meeting.

Thank you for your email. Concerned citizens are looking more for the residential tracks or homes that the city is looking into. I understand this is a volunteery program. Not mandatory if your home happens to be considered.

I just don't understand why The City of Alhambra would take a loss on property taxes when, when city is so run down, dirty, no support for new business, streets need repair.

On Mon, Oct 21, 2024, 5:11 PM McCurley, Maia <[email protected]> wrote:

Good afternoon Kimberly,

You can find the Historic Resource Survey online at the project website (www.HistoricAlhambra.com) under the documents page. The Historic Resources Survey identifies potentially eligible historic resources and potentially eligible historic districts. Please note that no historic resources nor any historic districts have been officially designated as of yet; this is still to be determined by the Ordinance, which is still in draft form and still needs to be reviewed by Commissions and the City Council. The map of potentially eligible historic resources and potentially eligible historic districts can be found on page 21 of the Historic Resources Survey document. The Ramona Park Craftsman Residential Historic District, which is located within Council District 4, has been identified as a potentially eligible historic district. Let me know if you have any additional questions.

Best regards,

Maia McCurley | Principal Planner
Community Development Department
111 S. First St. | Alhambra, CA 91801
T: 626-570-5042 | F: 626-458-4201
www.cityofalhambra.org

City Hall Hours:

M-Th: 7:00 am-5:30 pm
F: Closed

From: Kimberly Clark <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2024 3:31 PM
To: Siva, Yalini <[email protected]>
Subject: Historic Preservation ordinance

I'm interested to know where I can find the map showing the proposed Landmark designations and future potential designations and historic district for district 4. Please provide link as soon as possible.

We would appreciate it so much.

Thank you.

Security Awareness Learn more
Report Email Trust Email
The email came from an external source.

The email was sent from a personal email address.

From: jaime nieves
To: Alhambra Historic Preservation
Subject: Question regarding Historic Preservation Program Date: Friday, October 25, 2024 2:15:03 PM
Attachments: attachment-1.png
attachment-2.png
Good Afternoon, Yalini,
My name is Jaime Nieves and I am the pastor of Sage Granada Park United Methodist Church in Alhambra. Our church building is located at 1850 W. Hellman Ave in Council District 4, I believe.

I was surprised to receive the City of Alhambra's letter a month or so ago stating that our church property is listed on the city's Historic Resources Survey. What does that mean, exactly? Does that mean that our church building is being considered for official designation as an Historical Site? Any information you could give me, or to which you could direct me would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you so much for your assistance.

Blessings,
Jaime
Rev. Jaime Nieves
Sage Granada Park UMC
1850 W. Hellman Ave.

Alhambra, CA 91803
(626) 284-3229 - (Church)
(303) 475-4990 - (Cell)
From: [email protected]
To: Alhambra Historic Preservation
Subject: Re: Historic Preservation Program - District 1 Community Meeting: November 6 @ 6 p.m.

Date: Thursday, October 31, 2024 2:54:26 PM
Attachments: attachment-1.png
If it were in person I would. I do Zoom meetings all the time for work. But prefer in-person.

Barbara
Barbara Beckley
Freelance journalist
Editor, Travelscope Magazine
Member -- Society of American Travel Writers
300 S. Almansor Street
Alhambra, CA 91801
P: 626-284-5735
M: 626-824-0290
Email: [email protected]
Facebook: www.facebook.com/BarbaraBeckley.9
Twitter: www.twitter.com/PinkTennisCats
Instagram: www.instagram.com/BeckleyBarbara

Sent from AOL Desktop
In a message dated 10/24/2024 2:13:19 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [email protected] writes:

Security Awareness Learn more
Report Email Trust Email
The email came from an external source.

The email was sent from a personal email address.

From: mary heidsman
To: Alhambra Historic Preservation
Subject: District 2 meeting
Date: Thursday, October 31, 2024 8:02:50 AM
Attachments: attachment-1.png
attachment-2.png
Hi,
I forgot to log in for the meeting yesterday. I would like to know more about what is going on though. Is there additional information?
Thank you,
Mary Heidsman
Security Awareness Learn more
Report Email Trust Email
The email came from an external source.

The email was sent from a personal email address.

This email is from an unfamiliar sender outside your organization.

From: Hong Yan Fang Li
To: Alhambra Historic Preservation
Subject: Historic preservation ordinance
Date: Wednesday, November 6, 2024 10:57:17 PM
Attachments: attachment-5.png
attachment-6.png
Here is the answer to your question.

Security Awareness Learn more
Report Email Trust Email
The email came from an external source.

The email was sent from a personal email address.

This email is from an unfamiliar sender outside your organization.

From: [email protected]
To: Alhambra Historic Preservation
Subject: Historic Preservation Ordinance
Date: Wednesday, November 6, 2024 8:21:07 PM
Attachments: attachment-1.png
attachment-2.png
Hello Maia,

Would the City of Alhambra hold off the issuance of demolition permit if a property has been flagged as a potential historic property? However since it is still an ordinance, is the City required to process the request by a certain time frame if all requirements are met?

Best Regards,

Karen Shyong

Security Awareness Learn more
Report Email Trust Email
The email came from an external source.

The email was sent from a personal email address.

From: Joe Gallegos
To: Melissa Michelson
Cc: Reynoso, Vanessa; McCurley, Maia
Subject: Re: Due Thursday: Draft Ordinance Comments
Date: Thursday, November 7, 2024 3:31:12 PM
Attachments: attachment-1.png
attachment-2.png
attachment-3.ico
attachment-4.png
attachment-8.png
Good questions.

On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 8:33 AM Melissa Michelson <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Vanessa,
Thank you for the email reminder, and thank you for the FAQs web page. I shared my appreciation for that page’s thoroughness at the last City Council meeting. If I’ve somehow missed that an answer is on the FAQ, just let me know and I’ll re-visit it.
(As an aside, I’m told by a resident that the online Questionnaire that is due Nov. 17 doesn’t allow respondents to tick off more than one identifier in the last question. Could you please check on that and fix that glitch if it still exists, then let me know when it’s fixed so I can get back to him? Thank you.) When responding to the questions at our Dec. 4 commission meeting, I’d appreciate if the answers are identified as my questions, or answered all at once during the presentation, whatever is easier and makes the most sense to the presenters. That way, I can know each of my questions are being addressed and I don’t have to take up unnecessary time at the meeting re-asking the questions. As you can see, there is a good amount of them. An email response a few days before the meeting, in addition to oral response at the commission meeting would be ideal, so I can digest the answers, and most appreciated.

What sections do ADUs fall under; what language can be incorporated about how those would be treated and/or defined; what state law would supersede this ordinance as it relates to ADUs, if any? Where is ADU defined in the ordinance and/or referred to in Alhambra’s code? To compare, how are ADU’s differently addressed in 2-3 other cities with robust and/or recently revised or created ordinances?
What is a ’secondary facade’ as listed in T (b) p. 4 and V (b)? Please define.

Please define ’significant feature” (see Part V (c), for example.) On p. 6, under “Intent” it mentions "potentially eligible" and “eligible”. They are also mentioned on p. 2 “Applicability” and again on p. 12. Please define.

On p. 5, Part W (b), why is there an exception made for solar panels? Please list the city or state code reference if there is one.

On p. 3 definition of “historic resource”, does that include contributors to historic districts? What’s the definition of ‘historic significance’?
p. 9 under “historic district": what is a ‘preservation plan’ and ‘design guidelines’.

Where are those in the consultant’s Phase 2 Survey report to see an example? Please define.

On p. 13, part 2 Demolition Findings: what does “reasonable economic use” mean? What if it’s a residence? How will economic hardship be quantified and where is the form for owner to fill out? What is definition of “Rehabilitation”
On p. 14, “Certificates of Hardship” what is being referred to here specifically that would be ‘adversely affecting the significance of a historic resource”? Is it demolition? Alteration? Relocation? All of the above, other?
What definition is being used for ‘reasonable rate of return’ (p. 14) What is the definition of ‘remodel’ (p. 14, Section B) or is there another word that can be used so as to be consistent with the rest of the ordinance? On p. 17, “unsafe or dangerous conditions”, Part A refers to CA Historical Building Code. Does CEQA also apply here, and would it make sense to include that reference here, too? To be clear, is the currently written language on p. 11-13 what was shown in the flowcharts at the 5 community meetings? Please flesh out what ‘incentives’ are referred to on p. 16, Part B, because I don’t read any in that section. Please provide a list of other potential incentives that other cities offer.

In the Questionnaire due Nov. 17, what are examples of "further review" in terms of ‘additional individual evaluation’ in Q2 of the survey? and what would be a best practice timeline for handling flagged properties/additional individual evaluation?
As discussed at the Nov. 6 community meeting, “historic assessment as part of project review process”:
what are some options that other cities use for who pays for professional expert opinion when making changes or additions to the inventory or district boundaries or creating new districts? How much does that run, for example if HRG were to do it vs. other possibilities, like hiring a single historic architect? Please provide specific pricing examples, not generic ‘depends’ answer.

Of course this is non-binding; just your current rates at this moment in time would work, whether it’s per property, per hours, per square mileage, etc.

Who will have been involved in answering my Qs above?(city staff, consultants, or both). I would like to know who is providing the answer for each, ie, the source.

Finally, at last night’s community meeting, someone asked a question about SB9 and whether historic districts would be exempt from SB9. She said they would not. I looked at the bill and SB9 says the property must abide by this: (6) The development is not located within a historic district or property included on the State Historic Resources Inventory, as defined in Section 5020.1 of the Public Resources Code, or within a site that is designated or listed as a city or county landmark or historic property or district pursuant to a city or county ordinance. Unless I'm missing something, could someone please clarify or correct the statement for the record? Bill Text - SB-9 Housing development:
approvals.
legislature.ca.gov
Thank you, and I look forward to hearing the presentation at the next commission meeting.

Melissa Michelson
Vice-Chair, Alhambra Historic Preservation Commission
[email protected]
Google voice: (909) 784-5690
On Nov 5, 2024, at 11:25 AM, Reynoso, Vanessa <[email protected]> wrote:

Hello Commissioners,

Just a friendly reminder about submitting your questions regarding the Draft Historic Preservation Ordinance to me by Thursday, November 7th.

Thank you,
Vanessa.

Vanessa Reynoso | Deputy Director
Community Development Department
111 S. First St. | Alhambra, CA 91801
T: 626-570-5033
www.cityofalhambra.org

City Hall Hours:

M-TH 7:00 am-5:30 pm; Closed on Friday

From: Reynoso, Vanessa
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2024 11:30 AM
To: Reynoso, Vanessa <[email protected]>; [email protected] Cc: McCurley, Maia <[email protected]>
Subject: Draft Ordinance

Good morning, Commissioners

This email is sent to follow up with you on a couple of items:

1. DRAFT ORDINANCE: As you are aware, the draft Historic Preservation Ordinance has been made available for public review for quite some time. It is posted on the project website (historicalahmbra.com) and is directly accessible through the following link:
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5ff7afc7c2e0046116a6010c/t/66f60d9aecd09d164069efb7/1728920988556/City+of+Alhambra+Draft+HP+Ordinance+%28DISCUSSION+DRAFT+FOR+DISTRIBUTION%29.pdf

In preparation for the Commission’s December 4th meeting, please be sure to have read through the Draft Ordinance. To facilitate efficiency at the meeting, we also want to allow Commissioners to submit questions ahead of time.

If you have questions regarding the Draft Ordinance document only, please submit your written questions to me no later than noon on Thursday, November 7. Staff will work with HRG to incorporate responses into their presentation at the December 4th meeting for questions received by this time.

2. PROJECT WEBSITE: The project website has been updated and includes a new standalone FAQ page that consolidates information already existing on the site and new information. We will continue to update this page of the website throughout the process and will be sending out an eblast to those interested in receiving project updates. Please refer to this page before submitting any questions in the event that they may have already been answered. I look forward to receiving your questions!

Also, as a reminder…to avoid any potential Brown Act issues, please do not “reply all”.

Regards,
Vanessa.

Vanessa Reynoso | Deputy Director
Community Development Department
111 S. First St. | Alhambra, CA 91801
T: 626-570-5033
www.cityofalhambra.org

City Hall Hours:

M-TH 7:00 am-5:30 pm; Closed on Friday
Security Awareness Learn more
Report Email Trust Email
The email came from an external source.

The email was sent from a personal email address.

From: John Gilb
To: McCurley, Maia
Subject: Re: Historic Preservation Questionnaire
Date: Thursday, November 7, 2024 1:44:17 PM
Attachments: attachment-2.png
attachment-3.png
attachment-4.png
attachment-5.png
attachment-9.png
Alhambra Ordinance.pdf
My apologies. Here is the completed.questionnaire.

John Gilb
200 Champion Pl
Alhambra CA. 91801
[email protected]

From: McCurley, Maia <[email protected]>
Date: Thursday, November 7, 2024 at 1:41 PM
To: John Gilb <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Historic Preservation Questionnaire
Thanks, John. I’ve received your comment but your questionnaire was not attached. Were you intending to attach the completed questionnaire as a PDF? Or did you complete the questionnaire online here:
https://forms.gle/Zsp9rkn56HADwTqx8? Also, it looks like there was a typo in the e-mail address which is why it was not going through earlier. The correct e-mail address is [email protected].

Best regards,

Maia McCurley | Principal Planner
Community Development Department
111 S. First St. | Alhambra, CA 91801
T: 626-570-5042 | F: 626-458-4201
www.cityofalhambra.org

City Hall Hours:

M-Th: 7:00 am-5:30 pm
F: Closed

From: John Gilb <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2024 1:37 PM
To: McCurley, Maia <[email protected]>
Subject: Historic Preservation Questionnaire

To whom it may concern:

Please find attached a completed questionnaire in connection with Phase 3 of the Historic Preservation Program for the City of Alhambra.

THE CITY OF ALHAMBRA DOES NOT NEED A HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE. THIS IS A WASTE OF THE CITY’S LIMITED RESOURCES AND THE VALUABLE TIME OF IT’S RESIDENTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS.

Perhaps more time, money and energy could be spent on basic services such as improving the condition of our roads and the safety of our overall community.

Sincerely,

John Gilb
200 Champion Pl
Alhambra CA. 91801
[email protected]

From: Ho, Andrew
To: McCurley, Maia; Reynoso, Vanessa
Subject: FW: Historic Preservation Ordinance
Date: Thursday, November 14, 2024 10:09:18 AM
Attachments: attachment-1.png
attachment-5.png
Here are Ramona Convent’s concerns about the HP ordinance. Could we have someone pull the development agreement regarding the performing arts center.

Andrew Ho | Director
Community Development Department
111 S. First St. | Alhambra, CA 91801
T: 626-570-5041 | F: 626-458-4201
www.cityofalhambra.org

From: Kathleen Callaway <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, November 8, 2024 10:56 AM
To: Ho, Andrew <[email protected]>
Subject: Historic Preservation Ordinance

Andrew, thank you for your presentation at the meeting yesterday.

I had a couple of questions.

I know you said the “right of refusal” of the designation by the owner has not been considered.

My concern fright now for Ramona Convent Secondary School more concerns our property rights.

1. We have a current development agreement with the city to build a performing arts building – would the ordinance impact that agreement.

2. More important – should the school close sometime in the future and we want to sell the property, would we be able to do so – or would some sort of “eminent domain” prevent us from doing so?

Thanks for your help…and if these questions are still to be answered, I hope the commission would give them serious consideration. Ramona is older than the city by about 14 years; however, our historic building was so badly damaged in the 19897 earthquake, it had to be demolished and the current main building was erected.

Other buildings date from 1950’, 1967, 1980, 1987.

Sister Kathleen Callaway

Sent from Mail for Windows

Security Awareness Learn more
Report Email Trust Email
The email came from an external source.

The email was sent from a personal email address.

This email is from an unfamiliar sender outside your organization.

From: kathryn cheung
To: Alhambra Historic Preservation
Subject: Historic Preservation Ordinance Questionnaire
Date: Friday, November 8, 2024 1:05:10 PM
Attachments: attachment-2.png
attachment-3.png
Historic Preservation Ord Questionaire 11-8-24.pdf
Dear Sir/Madam,

Please see the attached Historic Preservation Ordinance Questionnaire.

Thanks.

Kathryn Cheung

Security Awareness Learn more
Report Email Trust Email
The email came from an external source.

The email was sent from a personal email address.

This email is from an unfamiliar sender outside your organization.

From: Philip McC
To: Alhambra Historic Preservation
Cc: violet aguilar
Subject: Historic Preservation survey - please consider our late entry Date: Saturday, November 23, 2024 2:02:08 PM
Attachments: attachment-2.png
attachment-3.png
Alhambra+HP+Ordinance_Questionnaire_FINAL+9-26-2024v2.pdf Hi Maia,
My wife and I just returned from traveling and just saw the 11/18 deadline. We would love for our voices to be included in the Historic Preservation Ordinance survey results. (We are very much in favor of it.)
Thank you for considering.

Sincerely,
Philip & Violet McCanless
Security Awareness Learn more
Report Email Trust Email
The email came from an external source.

The email was sent from a personal email address.

This email is from an unfamiliar sender outside your organization.

From: Allen Chen
To: Alhambra Historic Preservation
Subject: Historic Preservation Questionnaire
Date: Monday, November 25, 2024 10:43:36 AM
Attachments: attachment-2.png
attachment-3.png
IMG_20241125_0001.pdf
Please see attached.

Thank you!
Sincerely,
Allen Chen
JK Restaurant Equipment Inc.
3060 W. Valley Blvd
Alhambra, CA 91803
[email protected]
(626) 282-3928
From: Squarespace
To: Alhambra Historic Preservation
Subject: Form Submission - Contact Us
Date: Wednesday, December 11, 2024 5:38:14 PM
Sent via form submission from City of Alhambra Historic Preservation Program Name: Grace Mellis
Email: [email protected]
Message: Our property on 218 Main street was given a letter saying that we were under consideration for historical preservation. As a National Charity Owned thrift shop our building neither has any cultural or architectural significance that should be preserved. As such we are opposed to being included in the list of buildings. We are near the Pedrini Music which is on the other side of Chicken bun bun but the Pedrini building is currently undergoing renovation as far as we can tell and the chicken bun bun is very modern and we are very much an 1980s shopfront and neither want nor need architectural preservation. Please let us know what other feedback we need to give and where. Regards, Grace Mellis - MSA Director Manage Submissions
Does this submission look like spam? Report it here.

From: Squarespace
To: Alhambra Historic Preservation
Subject: Form Submission - Contact Us
Date: Wednesday, January 1, 2025 6:41:00 PM
Sent via form submission from City of Alhambra Historic Preservation Program Name: Corinna Chan
Email: [email protected]
Message: Hi,
I been receiving letters about your historic presentation program. I don’t totally under understand it and I don’t really able to follow what is going on. Is there an option I can be taking out of this program? Please reply me through email.

Thank you,
Manage Submissions
Does this submission look like spam? Report it here.

Security Awareness Learn more
The email came from an external source.

The message has been classified as graymail.

The email was sent from a personal email address.

From: Corinna Chan
To: McCurley, Maia
Subject: Re: Form Submission - Contact Us
Date: Tuesday, January 7, 2025 7:42:23 AM
Attachments: attachment-1.png
attachment-2.png
Thank you for your reply and explaining. I think I will be waiting to see then.

Thank you very much.

Corinna
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 6, 2025, at 11:09 AM, McCurley, Maia <[email protected]> wrote:

Good morning Corinna,

Thank you for reaching out. You have likely been receiving notices in the mail because your residence and/or property has been identified as either a potentially eligible historic resource or is located within a potentially eligible historic district. At this time, the City is still in the process of developing a Historic Preservation Ordinance which would identify what regulations and standards, if any, would apply to these potentially eligible historic properties. Since a Historic Preservation Ordinance is still in development and nothing has been formally adopted, there is no Historic Preservation program in place and as such, there’s nothing to opt out of at this time. The notices you’re receiving are purely informational and are intended to keep you up to date on the City’s progress with the development of a Historic Preservation program. I hope this provides some clarification. Please let me know if you have any additional questions.

Best regards,

<attachment-

1.png>
Maia McCurley | Principal Planner
Community Development Department
111 S. First St. | Alhambra, CA 91801
T: 626-570-5042 | F: 626-458-4201
www.cityofalhambra.org
<attachment-2.jpeg>

<attachment-3.jpeg>

<attachment-4.jpeg>

<attachment-5.png>

City Hall Hours:

M-Th: 7:00 am-5:30 pm
F: Closed

From: Squarespace <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 1, 2025 6:36 PM
To: Alhambra Historic Preservation <[email protected]> Subject: Form Submission - Contact Us

Name: Corinna Chan
Email: [email protected]
Message: Hi,
I been receiving letters about your historic presentation program. I don’t totally under understand it and I don’t really able to follow what is going on. Is there an option I can be taking out of this program? Please reply me through email.

Thank you,
Sent via form submission from City of Alhambra Historic Preservation Program Name: Corinna Chan
Email: [email protected]
Message: Hi,
I been receiving letters about your historic presentation program. I don’t totally under understand it and I don’t really able to follow what is going on. Is there an option I can be taking out of this program? Please reply me through email.

Thank you,
Manage Submissions
Does this submission look like spam? Report it here.

From: Squarespace
To: Alhambra Historic Preservation
Subject: Form Submission - Contact Us
Date: Monday, January 20, 2025 6:43:30 PM
Inbound Shield™ has detected suspicious elements in this email. You are advised to be cautious when clicking on links or opening attachments I trust this email Report as malicious
Sent via form submission from City of Alhambra Historic Preservation Program Name: Anna Fosselman
Email: [email protected]
Message: Attention: Joyce Amaro
Melissa Michelson
Steven Chen
Dylan Littlefield
Bert Ng
My husband and I attended the Historic Preservation Meeting on December 4, 2024 as we have a commercial property listed in the Historical Resources Survey as a ”Potentially Eligible Property”. The meeting went extremely long, and unfortunately we had to leave after about 2 hours and didn’t get a chance to speak or ask questions. The entire presentation was a bit confusing and lengthy, and it would have been helpful to have the information and presentation slides in advance to look over. We appreciate the questions by the Commission to clarify and explain some of the nuances of the Historic Preservation Ordinance and the process.

We are greatly opposed to having our commercial building listed in any way as historical, and don’t see any factors contributing to its historical significance other than age. Having this designation on a commercial property would have an immediate negative affect on our property value. It would greatly limit our ability to lease or sell the property in the future, if it has a “historically designated" old brick building on the premises that is difficult to alter or remove. In our case, we are located on Alhambra’s Auto Row, so a likely candidate for lease or sale would be a car dealership. Having our building designated as historic and subject to restrictions would make it unusable for this purpose, and thus greatly limit our property's marketability and the value of our greatest asset.

Commercial properties should have a different treatment and criteria for being subjected to any historic designation that in any way inhibits or restricts its use, alteration or value. The City of Alhambra should follow the guidelines of the California Historical Register with respect to historic designations and NOT place any property on the list under the objection of the property owners.

We do see some value in preserving important historic resources, but the City of Alhambra should focus on designating properties and buildings owned by the city, public buildings or spaces, and homes where the owners choose to have their property designated as historic. It is unfair for the city and/or historic commission to put the financial and regulatory burden of historic preservation directly on the backs of property owners without their consent. There should be an acknowledgement that any historic designation will result in additional costs, restrictions, and extra procedures for alteration that will all be carried by the individual property owner.

We also attended the District 3 meeting on October 2, 2024 and an overwhelming majority of the attendees seemed to be opposed to having their properties designated as historic and subject to any additional restrictions and oversight. The results of the surveys presented at the December 4th meeting showed the respondents clearly in favor of no historic designation or the least restrictive designation for Alhambra. The City of Alhambra does not have the strong historic context of a city like Pasadena, and a Historic Preservation Program should not be forced on residents and property owners who are opposed to it. We urge the city council and the Historic Preservation Commission to listen to their constituents and not force a Historic Preservation Program where it’s not wanted.

Sincerely,
Chris & Anna Fosselman
Fosselman’s Ice Cream Co.
1824 W. Main Street
Alhambra, CA 91801
Manage Submissions
Does this submission look like spam? Report it here.

From: Binnquist, Jessica
To: Ho, Andrew; McCurley, Maia
Cc: Montes, Joseph; [email protected]
Subject: FW: Historic Preservation Program
Date: Tuesday, January 21, 2025 10:21:37 AM
Can you please forward this as requested to the Commission and the consultant, and respond after we’ve done so? Maybe also provide the upcoming meeting details too? Thanks!
Jessica

From: Anna & Chris Fosselman <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2025 6:57 PM
To: Uwanawich, Lorraine <[email protected]>
Subject: Historic Preservation Program

Mr. Maloney,

Below is a copy of the email sent to the City of Alhambra Historic Preservation Program project team, but I am not sure if it goes directly to the 5 members of the Historic Preservation Commission listed below or to the Historic Resources Group which was contracted to work on the Historic Preservation Ordinance. I am sending you a copy as our District 3 Council member, and if you have a way to forward it to those listed below that would be appreciated.

Thank you,
Chris & Anna Fosselman

January 20, 2025

TO: Alhambra Historic Preservation Commission Attention: Joyce Amaro
Melissa Michelson
Steven Chen
Dylan Littlefield
Bert Ng

My husband and I attended the Historic Preservation Meeting on December 4, 2024 as we have a commercial property listed in the Historical Resources Survey as a ”Potentially Eligible Property”. The meeting went extremely long, and unfortunately we had to leave after about 2 hours and didn’t get a chance to speak or ask questions. The entire presentation was a bit confusing and lengthy, and it would have been helpful to have the information and presentation slides in advance to look over. We appreciate the questions by the Commission to clarify and explain some of the nuances of the Historic Preservation Ordinance and the process.

We also attended the District 3 meeting on October 4, 2024 and an overwhelming majority of the attendees seemed to be opposed to having their properties designated as historic and subject to any additional restrictions and oversight. The results of the surveys presented at the December 4th meeting showed the respondents clearly in favor of no historic designation or the least restrictive designation for Alhambra. The City of Alhambra does not have the strong historic context of a city like Pasadena, and a Historic Preservation Program should not be forced on residents and property owners who are opposed to it. We urge the city council and the Historic Preservation Commission to listen to their constituents and not force a Historic Preservation Program where it’s not wanted.

Sincerely,

Chris & Anna Fosselman
Fosselman’s Ice Cream Co.
1824 W. Main Street
Alhambra, CA 91801

Interesting reading . . .

Historic Designations Are Ruining Cities
forbes.com

The Dark Side of Historic Preservation
discoursemagazine.com

After blowback from residents, Palo Alto slows
down push for 'historical' designations
paloaltoonline.com

From: Squarespace
To: Alhambra Historic Preservation
Subject: Form Submission - Contact Us
Date: Wednesday, January 22, 2025 4:30:48 PM
Sent via form submission from City of Alhambra Historic Preservation Program Name: Ray Van Ness
Email: [email protected]
Message: Hello, my fiance and I are frequent attendees of the AHPP and just had a quick question that you may be able to answer. We live in a 1912 Craftsman on the 600 block of Lindaraxa Park, and are considering if The Mills Act is a good option for us. Are you familiar with the Mills Act, and does Alhambra 'Participate'? Thank you, and sorry if any of these are silly questions.

Manage Submissions
Does this submission look like spam? Report it here.

From: Squarespace
To: Alhambra Historic Preservation
Subject: Form Submission - Contact Us
Date: Tuesday, March 25, 2025 5:25:30 PM
Sent via form submission from City of Alhambra Historic Preservation Program Name: Olga Alarid
Email: [email protected]
Message: Seems we are behind schedule. When will the ordinance go before planning? Thank you.

Manage Submissions
Does this submission look like spam? Report it here.

March 25, 2025

Historic Preservation Commission
City of Alhambra
111 1st Street
Alhambra, CA 91801

Subject: Recommendation for Historical Preservation Ordinance opt-in

Dear Historic Preservation Commissioners,

On behalf of the Alhambra Chamber of Commerce, I write to express our recommendation for an amendment to the historical preservation ordinance. The Alhambra Chamber of Commerce recommends that the City of Alhambra make its historical preservation ordinance opt-in, or otherwise if necessary include in their historical preservation ordinance the option for property owners of commercial and multi-family to opt-out from the designation consideration assessment list.

The Chamber further supports economic and other incentives for owners of historic properties to preserve these buildings. The Chamber supports historic preservation as a means to celebrate the community's past and will continue to do its part to work with businesses to preserve the character of the city while still promoting economic growth. Generally, it should not be the responsibility of property owners of commercial and multi-family to preserve buildings because of their age if they can't make them viable as spaces for economic activity, or if the ordinance would otherwise impose some undue financial or other burden on the property or business owner.

Our city needs to be appealing to businesses and property owners in order to grow and with the uncertainty in our current economy, it's essential that ordinances do not hinder growth or encourage business owners to look at neighboring cities due to unnecessary burdens.

Alhambra should remain a top choice for businesses and residents alike. We believe that making the historical preservation ordinate an opt-in will facilitate a business friendly environment, one that is flexible, attractive, and growth-oriented. As a result, Alhambra will be better positioned to attract diverse businesses, generate employment opportunities, and boost the local economy.

We sincerely hope the Historic Preservation Commissioners recognize how much this will impact the property and business community and will take into consideration the current and future needs of the residents.

104 SOUTH FIRST STREET, ALHAMBRA, CA 91801 • (626)282-8471 • Fax: (626) 282-5596

Thank you for your consideration and dedication to the betterment of Alhambra.

Sincerely, on behalf of the Chamber Board of Directors,

Maria Gao
President,
Alhambra Chamber of Commerce

CC:

104 SOUTH FIRST STREET, ALHAMBRA, CA 91801 • (626)282-8471 • Fax: (626) 282-5596

From: Andrew Salimian
To: McCurley, Maia
Cc: Adrian Fine
Subject: Alhambra HP Ordinance - Support
Date: Wednesday, May 28, 2025 4:04:57 PM
Attachments: Alhambra_Historic_Preservation_Ordinance-HPC-LAC.pdf Dear Maia McCurley,

I’m submitting a letter of support for tonight’s agenda item on the HP Ordinance. I know this is a last minute submission, but I hope it can be made part of the record. Can you please share it with the Commissioners?

I’ll be in attendance tonight to speak in support. Thank you for facilitating this meeting.

Andrew Salimian
Director of Advocacy
Los Angeles Conservancy
(213) 430-4203 | [email protected]

Pronouns: He/Him

laconservancy.org
E-News – Facebook – Twitter – Instagram

Membership starts at just $40
Join the Conservancy today

May 28, 2025

City of Alhambra
Historic Preservation Commission
111 S First Street
Alhambra, CA 91801
Attn: Maia McCurley, Principal Planner
[email protected]

Re: Zoning Text Amendment AMD-25-03 (Historic Preservation Ordinance)

Dear Members of the Historic Preservation Commission,

The Los Angeles Conservancy supports the Historic Preservation Ordinance as drafted and commends the hard of work of the Commission, City Staff and historic preservation consultants to provide an ordinance tailored to Alhambra’s unique identity. We have been honored to have followed this process and see the ordinance amended and customized in a process that sought to seek balance between preservation, economic development and property rights. We find that the resulting ordinance is thoughtful and will help Alhambra better preserve the historic places that contribute to its history and sense of community.

We believe this ordinance is overdue for the City of Alhambra, a city that prides itself in its history and neighborhood character. We are glad to see it finally nearing adoption. The ordinance incorporates best practices from modern preservation ordinances to provide a better process for all members of the community. The ordinance includes clearly delineated definitions of minor and negligible alterations, which are exempt from review in most circumstances, as opposed to major alterations that require review.

Homeowners who are simply maintaining their house by repairing windows, repainting, or replacing their roof should have a simple and clear process and it is provided here.

The Commission also worked diligently to recommend incentives that will help bolster this fledgling preservation program. The Mills Act, exemption

from design review, permit fee reductions, and reduced parking requirements will all provide useful incentives to encourage homeowners or business owners to designate their properties. It may be some years before even a handful of properties are formally designated, but it’s likely that those who are interested in these incentives may be among the first.

Finally, we are glad to see owner consent for designation addressed in a way that is practical.

Only in rare circumstances do City Councils override owner objection to designation, and a four vote requirement would essentially make it feasible in only the rarest of scenarios. We believe this is a reasonable compromise.

The Conservancy asks that you approve the ordinance as presented. We commend the Commission for its dedication to the preservation Alhambra. Thank you for your consideration.

About the Los Angeles Conservancy:

The Los Angeles Conservancy is the largest local historic preservation organization in the United States, with nearly 5,000 member households throughout the Los Angeles area. Established in 1978, the Conservancy works to preserve and revitalize the significant architectural and cultural heritage of Los Angeles County through advocacy and education.

Sincerely,

Andrew Salimian
Director of Advocacy

June 25, 2025

Chris Olson
President, Alhambra Planning Commission
City of Alhambra
111 1st Street
Alhambra, CA 91801

Subject: Recommendation for Historical Preservation Ordinance opt-in

Dear Ms. Olson,

On behalf of the Alhambra Chamber of Commerce, I am requesting an amendment to the proposed Historical Preservation Ordinance. We request that the City of Alhambra make its historical preservation ordinance opt-in for property owners of commercial properties. As the ordinance is currently written, this requires every property that appears to be historic to go through a costly process to prove it may not be if it wants to do any modifications. This is in contrast to other local ordinances that instead allow anyone to file a case with the city that presents the evidence as to why a property should be considered historic and then duly designated. There are many properties in the city that may be old in age but not historic just because they were built in the 20th century.

The Chamber supports historic preservation as a means to celebrate the community's past and will continue to do its part to work with businesses to preserve the character of the city while still promoting economic growth. It should not be the responsibility of commercial property owners to preserve buildings simply because of their age if they can't make them viable as spaces for economic activity, or if the ordinance would otherwise impose some undue financial or other burden on the property or business owner.

Our city needs to be appealing to businesses and property owners in order to grow and with the increasing uncertainty in our current economy, it's essential that ordinances do not hinder growth or encourage business owners to look at neighboring cities due to unnecessary burdens.

Alhambra should remain a top choice for businesses and residents alike. We believe that making the historical preservation ordinate an opt-in will facilitate a business friendly environment, one that is flexible, attractive, and growth-oriented, while still offering an opportunity for historic preservation on a case-by-case basis.

We realize this is an important issue to the residents and businesses of the city. If the Commission is not inclined to adopt an opt-in approach for commercial buildings, we would be open to exploring alternative solutions and compromises to lessen the economic burden this 104 SOUTH FIRST STREET, ALHAMBRA, CA 91801 • (626)282-8471 • Fax: (626) 282-5596

ordinance will have on businesses and buildings owners. The burden of preservation should be on a nominator, and not the property owner.

As a result, Alhambra will be better positioned to attract diverse businesses, generate employment opportunities, and boost the local economy. We implore the Planning Commissioners to recognize how an in-unless-proven-otherwise approach will negatively impact the business community.

Thank you for your consideration and dedication to the betterment of Alhambra.

Sincerely, on behalf of the Chamber Board of Directors,

Maria Gao
President,
Alhambra Chamber of Commerce

CC:

104 SOUTH FIRST STREET, ALHAMBRA, CA 91801 • (626)282-8471 • Fax: (626) 282-5596

1 McCurley, Maia
From: Wu, Megan
Sent: Tuesday, July 8, 2025 3:46 PM
To: McCurley, Maia
Subject: FW: Vision for Old Town Alhambra / historic preservation ordinance , fall 2025 Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
Forwarding in case you didn’t get this morning!

From: Wu, Megan
Sent: Tuesday, July 8, 2025 8:20 AM
To: McCurley, Maia <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: Vision for Old Town Alhambra / historic preservation ordinance , fall 2025

Got this email – not sure if it was sent to anyone else.

From: Marisela Diaz <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, July 7, 2025 6:04 PM
To: Wu, Megan <[email protected]>
Subject: Vision for Old Town Alhambra / historic preservation ordinance , fall 2025

Security Awareness

The email came from an external source.

The message has been classified as spam.

The email was sent from a personal email address.

Adopt the survey list as inventory , with all properties automatically considered protected

I am supportive of the vision of an old town, Alhambra preserving, and restoring the existing architectural character along E. Main St.

I am a long time resident of Alhambra since 1969 to present .

Marisela Diaz

Security Awareness
The email came from an external source.

The message has been classified as spam.

The email was sent from a personal email address.

From: Eddy Liu
To: Alhambra Historic Preservation
Subject: 6 Halsted Circle
Date: Thursday, August 7, 2025 5:43:38 PM
Attachments: attachment-2.png
attachment-3.png
6 Halsted Circle-Historic Preservation Objection.pdf
Dear Sir,
I formally reject including or the possibility of including my property to the contributor list.

Please read the attached letter
Sincerely
D H Eddy Liu

ATTACHMENT 8
Alhambra Historic Preservation Ordinance
City Council Meeting
August 25, 2025

HISTORIC RESOURCES GROUP
WHY ARE WE HERE?
 Brief project update
 Overview of
methodology and
public outreach
 Review of HP
Ordinance
 City Council to take HP
Ordinance under
consideration
PHASE I: Historic Context Statement
COMPLETED March 2022

PROJECT OVERVIEW
 Framework for identifying and
evaluating historic resources
 Establishes historical themes
and eligibility standards
 Organized by chronological
periods from Native American
settlement to the present
 Emphasis on existing built
resources from 1875 to 1980

PHASE II: Historic Resources Survey
COMPLETED November 2023

PROJECT OVERVIEW
 Citywide field recon of all
19,000+ parcels
 Intensive-level field
documentation from
public right-of-way
 Potential eligibility for
local designation and/or
listing in the
California/National
Registers
PHASE III: Historic Preservation Ordinance
ONGOING 2024-2025

PROJECT OVERVIEW

WHAT DOES THE HP ORDINANCE DO?
 Provides recognition for the city’s historic resources  Provides protection for the city’s historic resources  Establish incentives to encourage rehabilitation of
historic resources
 Adds predictability to the local development
process
 Tailored to the needs of Alhambra and its historic
resources
 Critical component of any local HP program
 Consistent with CLG requirements
ORGANIZATION OF AN HP ORDINANCE?
 City duties and responsibilities
 Maintaining local register/inventoryAdministration
 Historic Resource assessments
 Major/minor alterations; demolitionProject Review
 Financial (Mills Act tax abatement)
 Process (waivers, streamlined review)Incentives
 Designation criteria & procedures
 Individual properties & historic districts
Evaluation &
Designation

SGV CITIES WITH HP ORDINANCES
 Arcadia (2019)
 Azusa (2001)
 Baldwin Park
(2012)
 Bradbury (2013)
 Covina (1997)
 Glendora (2014)
 Monrovia (1995)
 Pasadena (1969)
 Pomona (1988)
 San Gabriel (2017)
 San Marino (2018)
 Sierra Madre (1997)
 South El Monte (1989)
 South Pasadena
(1992)
 West Covina (2007)

METHODOLOGY/PUBLIC OUTREACH
OCT-NOV 2024Five (5)
Community Meetings
SEP 2024“Discussion Draft”
SEP-NOV 2024Questionnaires
DEC 2024-MAY 2025HPC Meetings
JUL 2025PC Meeting

KEY PROVISIONS

OPTION B

OPTION C

OPTION A
More Inclusive
Greater Protection
Higher Regulation
Common
Preservation
Practice
Less Inclusive
Lesser Protection
Lower Regulation
Options Presented to HPC
KEY PROVISION #1
How to use the Historic Resources Survey List/
Creation of an Inventory
Do not adopt the Survey list; receive and file
for informational purposes only, with a
requirement that all properties are
considered “flagged” for additional
evaluation (historic resources assessment).
(Option B)
KEY PROVISION #2
Age Requirement for Local Designation
No age requirement for local designation as
a Landmark.
(Option A/B)
KEY PROVISION #3
Integrity Threshold for Local Designation
Stated requirement that a property retain
sufficient integrity to convey its historic
significance for local designation as a
Landmark.
(Option B)
KEY PROVISION #4
Who is Allowed to Submit a Nomination
for Local Designation
Anyone can submit a nomination for local
designation as a Landmark.
(Option A/B)
KEY PROVISION #5
Who is Allowed to Prepare a Nomination
for Local Designation
Anyone can prepare a nomination for local
designation as a Landmark.
(Option A/B)
KEY PROVISION #6
Owner Consent Requirement
for Local Designation
No owner consent requirement for local
designation as a Landmark; City Council
can override owner objection only with a
supermajority vote (4-1) and only if
public benefit outweighs private burden.
(Option B)
KEY PROVISION #7
Required Percentage of Contributors
for Designation of a Historic District
Requirement of 50% + 1 of properties
within a proposed historic district
boundary be district contributors.
(Option A)
KEY PROVISION #8
Required Percentage of
Property Owner Approval
for Designation of a Historic District
Requirement that a minimum of 50% + 1
of property owners within a proposed
historic district boundary approve of
designation.
(Option A)
KEY PROVISION #9
Categorization of Major/Minor/Negligible
Alterations
Categorize more changes to historic
properties as “major alterations” subject
to a higher level of project review.
(Option A)
KEY PROVISION #10
Review of Alterations to Landscape
Changes to the landscape of a historic
property to be considered an alteration
subject to project review only if the
landscape is identified as a significant
feature in the evaluation/nomination for
local designation.
(Option B)
KEY PROVISION #11
Review of Alterations to Interiors
Changes to the interior of a historic
property to be considered an alteration
subject to project review only if the
interior is identified as a significant
feature in the nomination for local
designation.
(Option B)
KEY PROVISION #12
Mills Act Property Tax Abatement Program
City to participate in the Mills Act
program; all designated properties are
eligible, including California and National
Register-listed properties, local landmarks,
and contributors to designated historic
districts.
(Option A)
KEY PROVISION #13
Economic Hardship
Economic hardship provision to exempt a property
owner from the Ordinance due to extreme financial
hardship or adversity. For income-producing
properties, the hardship threshold is reasonable
rate of return; for non-income producing
properties, the hardship threshold is all reasonable
use of or return from the property.
(Option B)

HISTORIC DESIGNATION
Historic Landmark

APPLICATION
•Anyone may prepare and
submit an application for
designation.
•Owner consent for
submission of an
application is not
required.

OWNER

NOTIFICATION
•Owner is notified by letter
of application for
designation.
•Owner may object in
writing to designation.

PERMIT

MORATORIUM
•No major or minor
alteration permits may
be issued while an
application for designation
is in process.

HPC
•The Historic Preservation
Commission will hold a
public hearing to make a
determination on
designation eligibility and
submit a recommendation
to the City Council.

CITY COUNCIL
•City Council has sole
authority to designate a
Historic Landmark.
•City Council may override
an owner's objection to
designation with a
supermajority vote, and if
public benefit outweighs
private burden.

DEED RESTRICTION
•If designation is
approved, a deed
restriction shall be
recorded declaring the
formal designation.
•The deed restriction shall
be binding on all future
owners.

HISTORIC DESIGNATION
Historic District

APPLICATION
•Anyone may prepare and
submit an application for
designation.
•50% + 1 of property
owners within the district
must file their support in
writing with the
application.

PERMIT

MORATORIUM
•No major or minor
alteration permits for
contributors may be
issued while an
application for historic
district designation is in
process.

HPC
•The Historic Preservation
Commission will hold a
public hearing to make a
determination on
designation eligibility and
submit a recommendation
to the City Council.

CITY COUNCIL
•City Council has sole
authority to designate a
Historic District.
•City Council may override
owner objection to
designation with a
supermajority vote, and if
public benefit outweighs
private burden.

DEED RESTRICTION
•If designation is
approved, a deed
restriction shall be
recorded declaring the
formal designation.
•The deed restriction shall
be binding on all future
owners.

All designated properties (Historic Landmarks,
contributors to designated Historic Districts,
properties listed in the California or National
Registers) are eligible for:
 Mills Act Property Tax Abatement Program
 State Historical Building Code
 Exemption from Design Review
 Reduction of Building Permit Fees
 Waiver of parking requirements

HISTORIC DESIGNATION
Incentives for Designated Properties

PROJECT REVIEW
Designated Historic Landmark
MAJOR

ALTERATION
•Proposing major
alteration to a
designated Historic
Landmark.

C OF A
•A Certificate of
Appropriateness is
required to be
reviewed and
approved by the HPC.

MINOR

ALTERATION
•Proposing minor
alteration to a
designated Historic
Landmark.

C OF A
•A Certificate of
Appropriateness is
required to be
approved by the
Director.

DEMOLITION
•Proposing demolition
of a designated
Historic Landmark.

C OF D
•A Certificate of
Demolition is required
to be reviewed by the
HPC and approved by
City Council.

NEGLIGIBLE

ALTERATION
•Proposing negligible
alteration to a
designated Historic
Landmark.

EXEMPT FROM
REVIEW
•Project is exempt from
review under HP
Ordinance and issued
a waiver.

PROJECT REVIEW
Eligible Individual Historic Resource
MINOR

ALTERATION
•Proposing minor
alteration to an
eligible individual
historic resource.

EXEMPT FROM
REVIEW
•Project is exempt
from review under
HP Ordinance and
issued a waiver.

MAJOR

ALTERATION
•Proposing major
alteration to an
eligible individual
historic resource.

C OF A
•A Certificate of
Appropriateness is
required to be
reviewed and
approved by the HPC.

DEMOLITION
•Proposing demolition
of an eligible
individual historic
resource.

C OF D
•A Certificate of
Demolition is required
to be reviewed and
approved by the HPC.

NEGLIGIBLE

ALTERATION
•Proposing negligible
alteration to an
eligible individual
historic resource.

EXEMPT FROM
REVIEW
•Project is exempt from
review under HP
Ordinance and issued
a waiver.

PROJECT REVIEW
Potentially Eligible Individual
Historic Resource

DEMOLITION
•Proposing demolition
of a potentially eligible
individual historic
resource.

HRA
•A Historic Resources
Assessment is
required to determine
status (eligible or
ineligible).

ELIGIBLE

DETERMINATION
•Resource is determined
eligible.
•Resources determined
ineligible are exempt
from review under HP
Ordinance.

C OF D
•A Certificate of
Demolition is required
to be reviewed and
approved by the HPC.

MAJOR

ALTERATION
•Proposing major
alteration to a
potentially eligible
individual historic
resource.

HRA
•A Historic Resources
Assessment is
required to determine
status (eligible or
ineligible).

ELIGIBLE

DETERMINATION
•Resource is determined
eligible.
•Resources determined
ineligible are exempt
from review under HP
Ordinance.

C OF A
•A Certificate of
Appropriateness is
required to be reviewed
and approved by the
HPC.

PROJECT REVIEW
Potentially Eligible Individual
Historic Resource
MINOR

ALTERATION
•Proposing minor
alteration to a
potentially eligible
individual historic
resource.

EXEMPT FROM
REVIEW
•Project is exempt
from review under
HP Ordinance and
issued a waiver.

NEGLIGIBLE

ALTERATION
•Proposing negligible
alteration to a
potentially eligible
individual historic
resource.

EXEMPT FROM
REVIEW
•Project is exempt
from review under
HP Ordinance and
issued a waiver.

PROJECT REVIEW
Designated Historic District
District Contributors
MINOR

ALTERATION
•Proposing minor
alteration to a
contributor to a
designated Historic
District.

C OF A
•A Certificate of
Appropriateness is
required to be
approved by the
Director.

MAJOR

ALTERATION
•Proposing major
alteration to a
contributor to a
designated Historic
District.

C OF A
•A Certificate of
Appropriateness is
required to be
reviewed and
approved by the HPC.

DEMOLITION
•Proposing demolition
of a contributor to a
designated Historic
District.

C OF A
•A Certificate of
Appropriateness is
required to be reviewed
and approved by the
HPC.

NEGLIGIBLE

ALTERATION
•Proposing negligible
alteration to a
contributor to a
designated Historic
District.

EXEMPT FROM
REVIEW
•Project is exempt from
review under HP
Ordinance and issued
a waiver.

PROJECT REVIEW
Designated Historic District
Non-District Contributors
MINOR

ALTERATION
•Proposing minor
alteration to a non-
contributor to a
designated Historic
District.

EXEMPT FROM
REVIEW
•Project is exempt
from review under
HP Ordinance and
issued a waiver.

MAJOR

ALTERATION
•Proposing major
alteration to a non-
contributor to a
designated Historic
District.

C OF A
•A Certificate of
Appropriateness is
required to be
approved by the
Director.

DEMOLITION
•Proposing demolition
of a non-contributor to
a designated Historic
District.

C OF A
•A Certificate of
Appropriateness is
required to be approved
by the Director.

NEGLIGIBLE

ALTERATION
•Proposing negligible
alteration to a non-
contributor to a
designated Historic
District.

EXEMPT FROM
REVIEW
•Project is exempt from
review under HP
Ordinance and issued
a waiver.

PROJECT REVIEW
Designated Historic District
New Construction of Primary Building

NEW CONSTRUCTION
•Proposing new construction of
a primary building in a
designated Historic District.

C OF A
•A Certificate of
Appropriateness is required to
be approved by the Director.

PROJECT REVIEW
Certificate of Economic Hardship

APPLICATION
•An owner of a
Designated Historic
Landmark, Eligible
Individual Historic
Resource, or
Contributor to a
designated Historic
District are eligible to
apply for a Certificate of
Economic Hardship.

HPC
•The Historic
Preservation
Commission will hold a
public hearing to approve,
conditionally approve, or
deny the application for a
Certificate of Economic
Hardship.

REQUIRED

FINDINGS
•HPC shall make the
required findings in
order to approve the
Certificate of Economic
Hardship.

HPC RECOMMENDED CHANGE (1 of 1)
Under Designation Procedures for Historic
Resources/Application for Designation, change the term
“property” to “historic resource”.
(HP Ord. Section 23.23.070(A)(4) b, c, d, h).
 Intent was to clarify that designation could be for a single property (“Historic Landmark”) or a group of
properties (“Historic District).
 Not a substantive change.
 Using the term “historic resource” might erroneously
suggest an application for designation could be made
only for properties previously evaluated as historic
resources.

PC RECOMMENDED CHANGE (1 of 3)
Under Criteria for Establishing Economic Hardship/
Income-Producing Properties and Non-Income
Producing Properties, revise language to refer explicitly to “paragraph (f) below”.
(HP Ord. Section 23.23.100(C) (1),(2))
 Proposed revisions provide useful clarification linking the Economic Hardship Criteria directly to the required findings that follow.
 Not a substantive change.

PC RECOMMENDED CHANGE (2 of 3)
Revise the composition of the HPC to include a
“qualified historic consultant” as a
voting member of the Commission.
 Per Staff, PC generally does not provide input on the Municipal Code.
 Per Staff, PC generally does not provide input on the composition and staffing of City boards and
commissions.
 Making an outside consultant a voting member of the
HPC would be inconsistent with City’s standard
practice with other Boards and Commissions (ex.

Design Review Board).

PC RECOMMENDED CHANGE (3 of 3)
City to consider providing financial assistance for the preparation of Historic Resource Assessments.
 HP Ordinance establishes that “potentially eligible”
properties are not automatic resources but are
“flagged” for additional evaluation.
 Requires a Historic Resource Assessment (HRA) that
provides further research, analysis, and findings.
 HRA finds the property “eligible” (subject to the HP
Ord) or “not eligible” (not subject to the HP Ord).
 HRA is prepared by a professional HP consultant, thus there are time and cost considerations (sample ranges:
$5k-$10k, 4-6 weeks)
STAFF RECOMMENDED CHANGE (1 of 1)
Under Alterations to Historic Resources, clarify that all contributing and non-contributing resources in potentially eligible or eligible Historic Districts are exempt from review; however, any designated historic landmarks,
eligible individual historic resources, or potentially eligible individual historic resources within the Historic Districts would still be subject to the applicable review
requirements for these types of individual resources.
(HP Ord. Section 23.23.090)
 Added language clarifies that individual historic
resources (potentially eligible, eligible or designated) within the boundaries of a Historic District are still
subject to review.

WRAPPING UP
 Any questions?
 Requesting City Council to vote to
adopt HP Ordinance
 Requesting City Council to provide
direction on recommendations from
Staff, HPC and PC

ATTACHMENT 9

NOTICE OF EXEMPTION

TO: FROM:

County Clerk, County of Los Angeles City of Alhambra
Environmental Filings Community Development
12400 East Imperial Highway, Room 1201 Department
Norwalk, CA 90650 111 South First Street
Alhambra, CA 91801

SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Exemption

PROJECT TITLE/LOCATION:

Zoning Text Amendment AMD-25-03

LEAD AGENCY:

City of Alhambra, Community Development Department
111 South First Street, Alhambra, CA 91801

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

This is a City-initiated application for Zoning Text Amendment AMD -25-03 to adopt a Historic Preservation Ordinance establishing regulations and standards for designating historic resources within the City and regulating designated resources as part of a comprehensive Historic Preservation Program, as well as amending various sections of the Alhambra Municipal Code to establish consistency with the proposed Historic Preservation Ordinance.

NAME OF PUBLIC AGENCY APPROVING THE PROJECT
City of Alhambra

NAME OF PERSON OR AGENCY CARRYING OUT PROJECT
City of Alhambra

EXEMPT STATUS
[ ] Ministerial (Sec. 21080(b)(1)); 15268);
[ ] Declared Emergency (Sec. 21080(b)(3)); 15269(a);
[ ] Emergency Project (Sec. 21080(b)(4)); 15269(b)(c). [X] Exemptions (Sec. 15060(c)(2); 15061(b)(3); 15308)

REASONS WHY PROJECT IS EXEMPT
The proposed Ordinance is not subject to environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) because the Ordinance is an activity that is excluded from the definition of a project by Section 21065 of the Public Resources Code and section 15378(b) of the State CEQA Guidelines. The proposed Ordinance amendments to the Municipal Code are organization or administrative activities of government which will not result in direct or indirect physical changes to the environment and are exempt from CEQA under Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations Sections 15060(c)(2), 15061(b)(3), and 15308.

Project Contact Person: Maia McCurley Phone: (626) 570-5042 Signature: Date: September 9, 2025
Title: Planning Manager

Alhambra City CouncilAugust 25, 2025

Alhambra City Council
August 25, 2025