1 8-25 -25
Unofficial until approved by the
Alhambra City Council
MINUTES
Regular Meeting
ALHAMBRA CITY COUNCIL
August 25 , 2025
6:0 0 p.m.
ROLL CALL: At 6:06 p.m., on Monday, August 25 , 2025, the Alhambra City Council met in the Council Chambers of Alhambra City Hall.
PRESENT: MAZA, MALONEY, WANG, ANDRADE-STADLER, LEE
ABSENT: NONE
Officials Present : City Manager Binnquist, Assistant City Manager Garcia, Deputy City Manager Hembree, City Attorney Montes, City Clerk Myles, Director of Parks and Recreation Macias, Director of Finance Lieu, Director of Community Development Ho, Principal Planner McCurley, Director of Public Works and Utilities Ahlen, Chief of Police Kennedy, Chief of Fire Department Ragusa, Director of Library Services LohGuan, Director of Human Resources Ko, Manag ement Analyst Alvarez, Public Information Specialist Rodriguez
FLAG SALUTE : Mayor Lee
ANDRADE-STADLER : Councilmember ANDRADE-STADLER requested that Item No. 2 be moved to after Public Comment for Non-Agendized Items due to the number of speakers as well as the number of student speakers in the audience. Mayor LEE agreed to the change in agenda order.
LEE: Mayor Lee read the City ’s Mission Statement as follows: The City of Alhambra is dedicated to responsive, creative leadership and quality services, ensuring desirable neighborhoods and a supportive business environment, while being sensitive to the diversity of our community.
LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT : We acknowledge that the land on which we are gathered is the traditional, ancestral, and unceded territory of the Gabrielino/Tongva peoples. We seek to prioritize respect for the historic culture and contemporary presence of the native peoples throughout California, especially in the greater Los Angeles/Alhambra area. We come with respect and gratitude for the Gabrielino/Tongva people who still consider themselves the caretakers of this land. It is through their examples that we are reminded of our greater responsibility to take care of Mother Earth and to take care of each other.
PUBLIC COMMENT FOR NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS – F2M25-4
1) Gabe GUTIERREZ, 3312 W. Hellman Ave., requested the City return the stop sign at Hellman and Westmont. He also distributed copies of the intersection review for Hellman Ave. and Westmont Dr., which is on file in the City Clerk ’s office.
2) Fernando MARQUEZ, 3308 W. Hellman Ave., requested the City return the stop sign at Hellman and Westmont.
3) Henry AVILES, 3401 Julip Place, requested the City return the stop sign at Hellman and Westmont. 4) Rose DARENSBOURG, 2420 Capetown Ave., requested the City return the stop sign at Hellman and Westmont. She also distributed a community petition requesting the return of the stop sign, which is on file in the City Clerk ’s office.
5) John NEGRETE, 2001 Westmont Dr., requested the City return the stop sign at Hellman and Westmont. 2 8-25 -25
6) Suzi DUNKEL-SOTO, 2213 Winthrop Dr., requested the City return the stop sign at Hellman and Westmont.
7) Kevin LEE, 525 Howard St., discussed changes the Los Angeles County Development Authority made to standardize payment for Section 8 and the negative impacts to providing Section 8 housing. 8) Jim ROMAN requested the City return the stop sign at Hellman and Westmont. 9) Stephen TRAPANI, 508 S. Chapel Ave., discussed street light outage, graffiti, and trash in the streets.
He requested that outages be reported by City workers rather than relying on residents. 10) Antonio GARDEA, 2905 W. Norwood Pl., requested the City return the stop sign at Hellman and Westmont.
PRESENTATIONS
2. CONSIDERATION OF SUPPORTING THE ALHAMBRA TEACHERS ASSOCIATION FOOD PANTRY – F2M25-7, F2M25-17, M2M25-123
Councilmember ANDRADE-STADLER provided information regarding the item. At the July 28, 2025 Council Meeting, Councilmember Andrade-Stadler requested a donation of $60,000.00 to the Alhambra teachers Association (ATA) Food Pantry. A request from ATA and Urban Visionaries was subsequently submitted to the City for the amount of $60,000.00.
Urban Visionaries and ATA s ought to address food insecurity, provide immigrant resources and address systematic barriers faced by Alhambra students and families. The funding would assist approximately 500 Alhambra students and families. A donation of $60,000.00 would require a draw down from the General Fund Reserves. The Alhambra Municipal Code and Resolution No. R2M25-8 establish the placement of the General Fund Reserves, which are one-time unappropriated surplus funds for the City ’s unanticipated or deferred needs. A target of 30% in General Fund Reserves has been established by the City Council and was included in the City ’s 2025 Strategic Plan. The current reserve balance is 20.6%, or $20,578,968. If approved, an account number and transfer of $60,00.00 from the general fund will be initiated.
Li ’i Furimoto, representing Urban Visionaries, and Tammi Scor c ia , representing the Alhambra Teachers Association, were present to answer questions.
Public Comment:
The following people spoke in favor of the item:
1) Tammy Scorcia, 1318 E. Dalton Ave., Glendora, representing the Alhambra Teachers Association
2) Li ’i Furumoto, 3030 W. Main St., representing Urban Visionaries 3) Demitri Vera, resident at Atlantic and Main
4) Jay Xu, 22 South El Molino St.
5) Barry Tang, 1809 Pepper Street
6) Shirley Tatsuno, 1408 S. Fifth St.
7) Lucas Yu, a resident of 4 th St.
8) Edward Escarsega, via Zoom , also made suggestions for accountability and for the city to draw up a Memorandum of Understanding.
The following person spoke against the item:
1) Ron Sahu, via Zoom , also submitted his comments via email which are on file in the City Clerk ’s office.
3 8-25 -25
The following people made additional comments:
1) Jennifer NG, S. Cordova St., asked for clarification regarding community outreach and asked for clarification regarding community donations. She supported the organization but questioned the precedent set by the City making a donation with public funds. She questioned why the organization had not sought out 501(c)(3) status.
2) Lewis McCAMMON, 105 N. Cordova St., reported that he had received an email from Mr. Sahu regarding his concerns and went on to discuss additional information. He spoke in support of the organization and made suggestions for policies for future donations going forward as well as accountability reports from organizations. He also supported Ms. Ng ’s comments regarding the organization ’s status as a tax-exempt charity organization.
Discussion: Councilmember MAZA spoke in support of the Alhambra Teachers Association (ATA) and the Food Pantry. He discussed the Council ’s role as responsible stewards of the City ’s money. Mr. MAZA and Ms. FURUMOTO discussed Urban Visionaries and their relationship with Alhambra Unified School District (AUSD) in assessing the families in need, as well as their partnership with other organizations and agencies to procure the food for the Pantry. Mr. MAZA and Ms. BINNQUIST discussed the Reserve Funds. Mr. MAZA and Ms.
FURUMOTO went on to discuss how Urban Visionaries has worked to make the Food Pantry sustainable to meet the needs of the community through partnership with other agencies to procure food as well as their occasional purchase of culturally specific food items for families.
Mr. MAZA stated that he supported the donation although he stated that Council needed to be careful moving forward with the City reserve funds. He added that Council could make personal donations from their City stipends and committed to his own such donation.
Vice Mayor MALONEY spoke regarding food and housing insecurity in the community and stated that in a larger sense, this qualified as an emergency with regards to additional concerns in the community related to federal immigration enforcement. He stated that the Council did have some latitude and discretion with the reserve fund and that he would support this donation. Mr. MALONEY and Ms. FURUMOTO discussed why the money would be allocated to Urban Visionaries as a 501 (c)( 3 ) organization working with ATA. Ms. FURUMOTO explained the relationship between Urban Visionaries, ATA, and AUSD as well as the roles taken by each group. Ms. FURUMOTO and Mr. MALONEY discussed how the money would be used from this one -time donation, as well as Urban Visionaries plans to secure future funding sources. Mr. MALONEY went on to discuss the need for the Food Pantry to have a more sustainable plan for the future, the difficulties in relying on donations, and the appropriateness of using general fund reserve money. He suggested that Urban Visionaries consider devoting 10% of funds to dedicated administrative costs in order to create a plan to seek grants for program deliverables. He suggested that the City create an actual agreement of Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Urban Visionaries that would outline all parameters and what the deliverables would be. He further requested this include copies of receipts and timesheets for public transparency. He cited similar agreements with other groups and requested a report in 6 months to Council. He emphasized the importance of an agreement that would describe the scope of work and create transparency for the public in identifying deliverables. He echoed Mr. Maza in stressing that this was a one-time grant and that Council would have to be more careful about spending reserve funds in the future.
Councilmember WANG spoke regarding the need in the community but added that she wanted to understand the agreement. Ms. WANG, City Manager BINNQUIST, and Ms. FURUMOTO further discussed the relationship between Urban Visionaries, ATA, and AUSD in the operation of the Food Pantry. Ms. WANG and Ms. BINNQUIST went on to discuss the City ’s lack of a framework for evaluating support for non-profits, the lack of previous precedent of donations, service agreement contracts with other non-profit organizations, the Reserve Fund Policy, and Strategic Plan Goals related to the Reserve Funds. Ms. WANG expressed concerns with the donation and the appropriateness of using reserve funds for a one-time donation. She went 4 8-25 -25
on to discuss the purpose of the Reserve Fund, the need to maintain a reserve fund in case of an economic downturn, the need for a policy or procedure to spend taxpayer funds in an equitable and fair manner. She added that she would also be happy to personally donate as suggested by Mr. Maza or to assist in any way with fundraising or volunteering. She referred to the proposal submitted where a majority of funds would go to a multilingual coordinator and suggested that rather than a donation, that Council delegate City Board and Commission members help to find volunteers to help in this effort. She further suggested that the City help identify grants for Urban Visionaries. She stated that should Council identify food insecurity as a priority, then they should create a policy to handle similar requests. She stated that she would like a process similar to other City contract agreements associated with an approved Request for Proposal process.
Councilmember ANDRADE-STADLER and Ms. BINNQUIST discussed the Reserve Fund.
Ms. ANDRADE-STADLER made a motion to approve the donation with additions suggested by Mr. Maloney to include a report back to Council in 6 months, to increase the administrative allotment to 6%, and to draft an MOU with the City. She stated that she understood her colleagues ’ concerns, but added that these were unprecedented times with families in need.
She agreed that there needed to be a stronger process in place for donations .
Mayor LEE discussed her past relationship with ATA and expressed concern with donating to an organization with which she was personally associated with. She went on to discuss the Reserve Fund and the need for a process to make donations from the fund. Ms. LEE and City Attorney MONTES discussed state laws regarding the use of public funds as a gift for both charter law cities and general law cities. Ms. LEE went on to discuss the Reserve Fund Policy in place and stated that she did not support the donation without an agendized discussion to amend the policy. She went on to question naming ATA in the agreement when the money would go to Urban Visionaries. She further discussed the need to maintain the Reserve Fund for use in cases of emergency or economic downturn. Ms. LEE made a substitute motion to table the item until Council could have an agendized discussion to amend the Reserve Fund Policy to include donations or gifts.
Mr. MALONEY seconded Ms. Andrade-Stadler ’s motion, but offered amendments to her motion. He suggested that the language be amended to omit mention of ATA since it would be going to Urban Visionaries, requested that this be called a grant rather than a donation, and requested a grant agreement which would allow for legal requirements of the grantee. He further suggested a moratorium for any future expenditures of the General Fund Reserves for similar requests from non-profits for grants, until staff and Council could develop a policy under the Reserve Fund Policy as well as a separate policy for grant agreements. Ms. ANDRADE- STADLER accepted the amendments to her motion and called for the vote.
Ms. LEE repeated her substitute motion on the table. Mr. MALONEY and Ms. LEE discussed his amendments. Ms. LEE asked if Staff would draft the grant agreement, which Mr.
MALONEY confirmed. Ms. LEE asked if Mr. Maloney would consider an additional amendment to reduce the cost. Mr. MALONEY offered an explanation regarding operating costs of nonprofits but declined the suggestion. They continued to discuss the role of volunteers versus paid coordinators as well as donating money for food procurement as opposed to administrative costs . Ms. ANDRADE-STADLER called again for the vote on her motion.
Ms. LEE stated that she would not support the donation. Ms. WANG expressed concern with the donation and seconded Ms. Lee ’s substitute motion to table discussion until Council and staff could develop a criteria. Ms. LEE restated her motion to table the discussion, which Ms.
WANG seconded. Ms. LEE called for the vote on her motion. Mr. MALONEY and Mr. MONTES discussed Rosenberg ’s Rules of Order in which case the substitute motion would be voted on before the original motion.
5 8-25 -25
SUBSTITUTE MOTION: To table the item until Council and staff could draft a donation program which would reflect equity, fairness, and accountability for the future.
Vote: Moved: LEE Seconded: WANG
Ayes: WANG, LEE
Noes: MALONEY, MAZA, ANDRADE-STADLER
Absent: NONE
The motion failed.
Council next voted on the amended original motion to draft a grant agreement between the City of Alhambra and Urban Visionaries for $60,000 from the General Fund Reserves, and that a moratorium be placed on similar grants until Council could discuss amendments to the Reserve Fund Policy and draft a grant agreement policy. The motion carried at a vote of 3 to
2. Mr. MAZA emphasized that he would vote on this as a one-time action due to the emergency.
Mr. MONTES requested clarification from Mr. Maloney and Ms. Andrade-Stadler and asked if the motion was intended for staff to create the grant agreement and move forward or if they would like staff to draft the agreement for Council approval at the next meeting. Mr. MALONEY clarified that between the original motion and the amended motion, the parameters were well described and that staff was equipped to follow through.
Action Taken : City Council awarded a one-time grant of $60,000 to Urban Visionaries for food distribution and immigrant resources for high need families in Alhambra ; provided direction to staff regarding the grant agreement; directed staff to undertake the steps necessary to finalize Council ’s action; and placed a moratorium on any similar donations until such a time as a policy could be created to govern use of public funds for grants.
Vote: Moved: ANDRADE-STADLER Seconded: MALONEY
Ayes: MALONEY, MAZA, ANDRADE-STADLER
Noes: WANG, LEE
Absent: NONE
RECESS & RECONVENE : Mayor LEE called for a brief recess at 8:34 p.m. and the meeting resumed with all Councilmembers present at 8:50 p.m.
LEE : Vice Mayor Lee recused herself from the discussion of Item No. 1 due to property which may be affected by the Ordinance. Ms. LEE left Council Chambers at 8:51 p.m.
PUBLIC HEARING
1. PUBLIC HEARING TO ADOPT AN ORDINANCE APPROVING ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT AMD-25-03, AMENDING TITLE 23 (ZONING) OF THE ALHAMBRA MUNICIPAL CODE TO INCORPORATE CHAPTER 23.23 (HISTORIC PRESERVATION) AND OTHER ASSOCIATED AMENDMENTS, AND AMENDING CHAPTER 2.41 (HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION); AND DETERMINE THIS ACTION IS EXEMPT FROM CEQA – F2M20-51, N2M25-101, O2M25-4848 , M2M25-130
Director of Community Development HO delivered a staff report and Kari FOWLER, from the Historic Resources Group (HRG), and Evanne St. Charles, from Architectural Resources Group, delivered a presentation, which is on file in the City Clerk ’s office. Christine Lazzaretto, from Historic Resources Group, was also present to answer questions. Mr. HO stated that 6 8-25 -25
Senior Planner McCURLEY and several Planning Commissioners were also present in the audience.
This was the time and place set by Notice No. N2M25-101 for the City Council to hold a public hearing to consider an application for Zoning Text Amendment AMD-25-03 to adopt a Historic Preservation Ordinance. Zoning Text Amendment AMD-25-03 is a City-initiated application to adopt a Historic Preservation Ordinance establishing regulations and standards for designating historic resources within the City and regulating designated resources as part of a comprehensive Historic Preservation Program, as well as amending various sections of the Alhambra Municipal Code to establish consistency with the proposed Historic Preservation Ordinance. Adoption and implementation of a Historic Preservation Ordinance aligns with the goals, policies, and objectives set forth in the City ’s General Plan and the City Council 2025 Strategic Plan. The revised Historic Preservation Ordinance establishe d regulations and standards for the treatment of historic resources City-wide that were intended to: 1.) Balance the interests of the community and individual property owners; 2.) Provide recognition of and protection for existing historic resources; 3.) Establish incentives to encourage rehabilitation and preservation of historic resources; and 4.) Add predictability to the local development process. The Ordinance, which would apply City-wide, establishe d the process for determining a property ’s status as a historic resource. Statuses include d : (1) eligible or potentially eligible individual resource; (2) contributor or non-contributor in an eligible or potentially eligible historic district; (3) designated landmark; or (4) contributor or non-contributor in a designated historic district.
The City ’s Historic Resources Survey preliminarily identified potentially eligible individual resources and potentially eligible historic districts; however, further evaluation in the form of a Historic Resource Assessment would be necessary to determine whether a property is an eligible resource, and a historic resources survey report would be necessary to determine if an area with a grouping of resources qualifies as an eligible historic district. While the Ordinance d id provide procedures which would allow an owner to object to a designation nomination, it d id not allow a property owner to “opt-out ” of being subject to the regulations and requirements implemented under the Ordinance.
At their July 7, 2025 regular meeting, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to review the updated Historic Preservation Ordinance and adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 25-04 (Attachment 2 of the Staff Report dated 8-25-25 ) by a vote of 7-0, recommending City Council approval of Zoning Text Amendment AMD-25-03, with three (3) additional recommendations. The Planning Commission ’s recommendations were identified in Section 3 of Planning Commission Resolution No. 25-04 which wa s Attachment 2 of the Staff Report for this item. The proposed Historic Preservation Ordinance, along with the recommendations of the Historic Preservation Commission and Planning Commission, were presented to the City Council for final consideration and adoption. Staff also recommend ed the City Council consider an additional suggested revision, which would provide additional clarity in Section 23.23.090, Alterations to Historic Resources. Staff ’s recommendation was to clarify that all contributing and non-contributing resources in potentially eligible and eligible Historic Districts were exempt from review; however, any designated historic landmarks, eligible individual historic resources, or potentially eligible individual historic resources within the Historic Districts would still be subject to the applicable review requirements for these types of individual resources.
Finally, The City reviewed the environmental impacts of this Ordinance under the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq. “CEQA ”) and the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 Cal. Code of Regs. §§ 15000, et seq., the “CEQA Guidelines ”). This Ordinance was not subject to further environmental review because: (1) it would not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15060(c)(2); (2) there was no possibility that this 7 8-25 -25
Ordinance w ould have a significant effect on the environment (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15061(b)(3)); (3) the proposed amendments w ould assure the maintenance, restoration, enhancement, or protection of the environment (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15308); and (4) the Ordinance, by itself, d id not constitute a “project ” as defined in section 21065 of the Public Resources Code and the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15378). It can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that this Ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment.
Vice Mayor MALONEY asked for clarification regarding the different categories , including landmark status , eligible individual historic resources and potentially eligible resources, and the process to seek designation through the Historic Resources Assessment (HRA). Ms.
FOWLER and Ms. St. CHARLES provided clarification regarding terms and process.
Open Public Hearing : Vice Mayor Maloney opened the public hearing.
Public Comment:
The following people supported the Ordinance:
1) Chris O lson
2) Bert Ng, 203 S. Cordova St.
3) Jennifer Ng, S. Cordova St.
4) Shirley Tatsuno, 1408 S. Fifth St, also discussed her concerns with the ordinance. 5) William Henderson, 620 N. Stoneman Ave., representing the Alhambra Chamber of Commerce 6) Joyce Amaro, 6 th St.
7) Lewis McCammon, 105 N. Cordova St.
8) Melissa Michelson
9) Rosalind Sagara, representing the Los Angeles Conservancy, via Zoom 10) Oscar Amaro, via Zoom
11) Erica Garcia, via Zoom , representing the Planning Commission, also clarified the Commission ’s recommendation regarding staffing.
The following people spoke against the Ordinance:
1) Jason Carroll, 2360 W. Main St. , also distributed handouts to the Council which are on file in the City Clerk ’s office.
2) Andre Ransons, 809 W. Hellman Ave.
3) Patricia Murphy, 1009 N. Granada Ave.
4) Brett Meredith, 819 W. Commonwealth Ave., representing Atherton Baptist Homes 5) Alb orz Mohtashami, 1621 S. Monterey St.
6) Anna Fosselman, via Zoom
Close Public Hearing : After receiving public testimony, Vice Mayor Maloney closed the public hearing.
Discussion : Councilmember WANG discussed the importance of the Historic Preservation Ordinance and acknowledged the concerns of the public. Ms. WANG and Mr.
HO discussed the different categories for homes under the Historic Preservation Ordinance, the types of major or minor alterations allowable under the ordinance, and provisions for economic hardship. Mr. HO, City Attorney MONTES , and Principal Planner McCURLEY continued to provide clarification regarding economic hardship provisions. Ms. WANG and Ms.
McCURLEY went on to discuss the incentives for property owners as designated landmarks , the eligible properties noted in the Historic Resources Assessment, and the appeal process for property owners . Ms. WANG supported the ordinance and requested staff explore further incentives for commercial and residential propert y owners.
Councilmember MAZA thanked staff, Council, the consultant, and community members such 8 8-25 -25
as the Historical Society and Alhambra Preservation Group for all their work. He supported the ordinance but expressed some concerns regarding commercial properties and private property rights. Mr. MAZA, Ms. FOWLER, and Ms. ST. CHARLES discussed the Historic Resouces Survey process, when residents would have to pay for a Historic Resources Assessment during a major alteration or demolition, identification of interior of a building during project review, property sales, and Accessory Dwelling Unit design oversight. Ms. McCURLEY also provided clarification regarding Accessory Dwelling Units. Mr. MAZA, Ms. FOWLER, and Ms. ST. CHARLES discussed the formation of an Historic District and the City ’s ability to apply for State Certified Local Government Status . Mr. MAZA stated that his biggest concern was regarding commercial properties but stated that the ordinance could be assessed over time and could be improved over time.
Councilmember ANDRADE-STADLER thanked staff, the Historic Preservation Commission, and the Planning Commission for their work and commented on the many changes seen in the community. Ms. ANDRADE-STADLER, Ms. FOWLER, Ms. ST. CHARLES, and Ms.
LAZZARETTO discussed owner consent allowable under other cities ’ ordinances as well as the provisions in the proposed ordinance. Ms. ANDRADE-STADLER supported Ms. Wang ’s suggestion for staff to explore other incentives for property owners.
Vice Mayor MALONEY thanked staff, consultants and Commission members for their work and supported the ordinance. He went on to discuss governmental regulation of private property , acknowledged the concerns of private property owners, and the methods for property owners to object. Mr. MALONEY and Mr. MONTES discussed policies to address additional costs and the Planning Commission recommendation. Mr. MALONEY stated that he felt the importance of the ordinance was to protect elements which were identified in the survey, stated that he looked forward to further discussions of smaller details such as demolition certificates, briefly discussed the difficulties of downzoning, and briefly discussed the difficulties of interior assessment. Mr. MALONEY and Mr. MONTES discussed the supermajority vote of Council.
He stated that he would like further discussion regarding cost to property owners, the application process, and technical assistance for applicants.
Mr. MAZA motioned to approve the ordinance, which was seconded by Mr. MALONEY. Mr.
MONTES asked for confirmation regarding changes to the ordinance including the Historic Preservation Commission recommendations regarding definitions of word changes to historic resources and properties; the Planning Commission recommendation regarding findings; and s taff ’s textual recommendation which identifies the scope of review necessary for properties.
Mr. MAZA confirmed that these changes were included in his motion to approve. Mr. MONTES asked for confirmation regarding Planning Commission ’s recommendations regarding financial assistance policies which would be drafted at a later date. Mr. MAZA confirmed that the motion included this direction to staff. Ms. WANG suggested that staff also look into options and mitigations for time and cost burdens on the property owners. Mr. MAZA agreed to the suggestion and added that staff review the policies of other cities. Mr. MONTES asked for clarification regarding the Planning Commission recommendation on the composition of the Historic Preservation Commission. Mr. MALONEY, Mr. MONTES, and Ms. McCURLEY discussed the recommendation to add a qualified historic consultant by modifying Title 2 in the Alhambra Municipal Code. Mr. MALONEY agreed that while there should be a qualified historic consultant for the commission, that the Municipal Code should not be amended to specifically require it.
Action Taken : City Council:
1. Conduct ed a Public Hearing to receive public testimony ;
2. Directed staff to include Historic Preservation Commission recommendations regarding certain definitions , Planning Commission recommendations regarding 9 8-25 -25
findings, and s taff ’s recommendations regarding the scope of review necessary for properties in the proposed ordinance; direct ed staff to further review the Planning Commission ’s recommendation to consider financial assistance for the preparation of Historic Resources Assessments and present to Council at a later date ; directed staff review the Historic Preservation ’s recommendation to consider a reduction in building permit fees and present to Council at a later date ; and introduce d and g ave first reading by title only, waiving further reading to the following ordinance entitled:
Ordinance No. O2M25-4848 : AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALHAMBRA ADOPTING ZONING TEXT
AMENDMENT AMD-25-03, AMENDING TITLE 23 (ZONING) OF THE
ALHAMBRA MUNICIPAL CODE TO INCORPORATE CHAPTER
23.23 (HISTORIC PRESERVATION) AND OTHER ASSOCIATED
AMENDMENTS, AND AMENDING CHAPTER 2.41 (HISTORIC
PRESERVATION COMMISSION)
which ordinance shall return for a second reading and adoption at the next City Council meeting on September 8, 2025 ; and,
3. Determine d this action was exempt from CEQA. ( M2M25-130 ) Vote: Moved: MAZA Seconded: MALONEY
Ayes: MAZA, MALONEY, WANG, ANDRADE-STADLER
Noes: NONE
Absent: LEE
LEE: Mayor Lee returned to Council Chambers at 11:47 p.m.
3. SENATE BILL (SB) 79 (WIENER), THE ABUNDANT & AFFORDABLE HOMES NEAR TRANSIT ACT – F2M25-19
Director of Community Development HO delivered a staff report and presentation, which is on file in the City Clerk ’s office. SB 79 (Wiener), also known as the "Abundant & Affordable Homes Near Transit Act", is a California bill aimed at increasing housing density near public transportation stops. It would allow multi-family residential development, potentially up to seven stories, near train stations and bus rapid transit stops which are stops that have dedicated bus lanes with 15 minute or less headways during peak commuting hours, overriding many local zoning laws. The bill is designed to address the state's housing crisis by boosting housing supply, encouraging public transit use, and reducing reliance on cars. Possible impacts to the City of Alhambra will be focused on the southern portion of the City that may fall within half-mile of the CalState LA Metrolink station. The station may be considered a Tier 3 transit-orientated development stop which could allow developments of up to 45 feet high, 60 units per acre, and a F.A.R. of 2.0. Otherwise, there will be no direct impact to Alhambra as Alhambra does not have any qualifying “transit-oriented development stops ” including any bus service meeting the standards of paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 21060.2 of the Public Resources Code. Key aspects of SB 79 include allowing higher density housing near major transit stops, including apartments and other multi-family dwellings. This potentially includes areas currently zoned for single-family homes. The bill would also allow transit agencies more flexibility in developing land they own, potentially leading to more housing and increased ridership. It would also create statewide standards for housing developments near high frequency transit stops. The bill does require any proposed development would need to provide housing for lower income households with different percentage rates of the total units by different income levels pursuant to Section 50106 of the Health and Safety Code. SB 79 has passed the California State Senate and is now in the Assembly. If passed by the Assembly 10 8-25 -25
and signed by the Governor, it will become law and go into effect on July 1, 2026.
Approximately, 150 cities have submitted letters of opposition through CalCities under a coalition.
Public Comment:
The following people spoke in favor of SB79:
1) Alborz Mohtashami, 1621 S. Monterey St.
2) Elliott Lee, 812 Curtis Ln.
3) Omar Galicia, via Zoom
The following people expressed concerns with SB79:
1) Jennifer Ng, S. Cordova St., distributed a handout to Council and requested clarification regarding this bill ’s effect on the City.
2) Lewis McCammon, 105 N. Cordova St., distributed a handout to Council 3) Melissa Michelson, representing the Emery Park Community Group Discussion: Vice Mayor MALONEY thanked staff for their information and stated that it seemed as though the affected area would be very small. He stated that he looked forward to the State Assembly process and the amendments made. Councilmember MAZA supported the letter of opposition. Councilmember WANG and Director of Community Development HO further discussed the bill and its potential effect on the City given the area in question. She discussed the intention of the bill and the ways it failed to recognize the specific needs at the local level. Mayor LEE and Mr. HO discussed the potential impacts of the bill .
Ms. LEE went on to discuss the concerns of residents and their opposition to the bill, the letter of opposition, her concerns regarding the State ’s overreach, other local cities ’ opposition, the local burden of additional housing, and the erosion of democracy. She stated that the City of Alhambra officially opposed SB79.
Action Taken : City Council receive d and file d this informational report.
CONSENT AGENDA (Item Nos. 4 – 1 8 )
All items listed under the Consent Agenda were considered by the City Council to be routine and were enacted by one motion .
4. NOTICE OF COMPLETION: DESIGN AND PURCHASE OF ALHAMBRA PLACEMAKING SIGNAGE PROJECT – F2M24-51, C2M25-1, M2M25-124 On January 13, 2025, the City Council awarded a contract to Square Signs LLC dba Front Signs for $159,665.55 for the Design and Purchase of Alhambra Placemaking Signage Project. The Placemaking Signs were installed at Alhambra, Almansor and Granada Parks.
There were no change orders associated with the project. This project was inspected by staff, and all work was completed in accordance with the City ’s requirements and specifications. As such, it was appropriate for the City Council to accept this project as complete.
Discussion: None.
Action Taken : City Council accept ed the work of Square Signs LLC dba Front Signs for the Design and Purchase of Alhambra Placemaking Signage Project as complete in the amount of $159,665.55; direct ed the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the County of Los Angeles for recordation; instruct ed the Finance Director to release the 5 percent 11 8-25 -25
retention 35 days from the date of recordation, if no liens are filed; and direct ed staff to undertake the steps necessary to finalize Council ’s action. ( M2M25-124 ) Vote: Moved: ANDRADE-STADLER Seconded: MALONEY
Ayes: ANDRADE-STADLER, WANG, MALONEY, MAZA, LEE
Noes: NONE
Absent: NONE
5. NOTICE INVITING BIDS: STORY PARK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT – F2M22-37 , N2M25- 111
The Story Park Improvement Project sought to convert the vacant pool space adjacent to the Joslyn Center into a green space. The pool has been out of service for many years. The project was funded by Proposition 68 Statewide Park Program. Specifications and bid documentation were completed for the Project, which include d : Old pool and building removal; New landscaping around the new green space; New picnic tables with shade umbrellas; A small walking trail; and, Upgraded lighting. Project bids would be due no later than 10:30 a.m. on September 18, 2025 in the Office of the City Clerk, and would be opened at 11:00 a.m. that same day.
Discussion : None.
Action Taken : City Council authoriz ed staff to circulate a Notice Inviting Bids to prospective contractors for the construction of the Story Park Improvement Project with bids due September 18, 2025 ; and , direct ed staff to undertake the steps necessary to finalize Council ’s action.
Vote: Moved: ANDRADE-STADLER Seconded: MALONEY
Ayes: ANDRADE-STADLER, WANG, MALONEY, MAZA, LEE
Noes: NONE
Absent: NONE
6. NOTICE INVITING BIDS: GOLF COURSE PARKING AREA LANDSCAPE ENHANCEMENT PROJECT – F2M25-46, N2M25-112
The Golf Course Parking Area Landscape Enhancement Project aim ed to enhance the landscaped areas surrounding the golf course parking lot. The existing landscape feature d outdated and broken irrigation systems, along with missing plant materials that leave the area looking sparse and uninviting. The proposed improvements would significantly increase the visual appeal of the site, particularly in anticipation of the new dog park. Specifications and bid documentation were completed for the Project , which include d : Demolish ing existing plant materials; Improv ing the grading of the dirt slope; Integrat ing new soil into the existing slope; Install ing new water conservation system for irrigation; and, Add ing over 600+ new California native and drought tolerant plant materials. The project bids would be due no later than 10:30 a.m. on September 18, 2025 in the Office of the City Clerk, and would be opened at 11:00 a.m. that same day.
Discussion: None.
Action Taken : City Council authorize d staff to circulate a Notice Inviting Bids to prospective contractors for the Golf Course Parking Area Landscape Enhancement Project with bids due on September 18, 2025; and, direct ed staff to undertake the steps necessary to finalize Council ’s action.
12 8-25 -25
Vote: Moved: ANDRADE-STADLER Seconded: MALONEY
Ayes: ANDRADE-STADLER, WANG, MALONEY, MAZA, LEE
Noes: NONE
Absent: NONE
7. APPROVE MOU: MTA - NATIONAL TRANSIT DATABASE – F2M3-72, C2M25- 37 , M2M25- 125
Staff request ed that the City Council approve a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for collecting and reporting Alhambra ridership data for the National Transit Database for the reporting years 202 2 and 202 3 . The City of Alhambra is required to approve the MOU between Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA) and the City and submit an invoice to the MTA prior to June 30, 202 7 and June 30, 2028 respectively, in order to receive payment.
Discussion: None.
Action Taken : City Council approve d a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), subject to final language approval by the City Manager and City Attorney by and between the City of Alhambra and the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority for collecting and reporting data for the National Transit Database for the Report Year 2022 and 2023; direct ed the Director of Finance to invoice LACMTA in the amount of $178,639 for the 2021-22 Reporting Year and $177,014 for the 2022-23 Reporting Year once the MOU is executed; and, direct ed staff to undertake the steps necessary to finalize Council ’s action. (M2M24-125 )
Vote: Moved: ANDRADE-STADLER Seconded: MALONEY
Ayes: ANDRADE-STADLER, WANG, MALONEY, MAZA, LEE
Noes: NONE
Absent: NONE
8. AUTHORIZE RFP: WATER WELL MAINTENANCE SERVICES AND PUMP AND MOTOR REPAIRS – F2M25- 47 , RFP2M25-15
Maintaining the City ’s water well infrastructure is crucial for ensuring a consistent supply of clean and safe drinking water. Water Well maintenance services and pump and motor repairs were needed to maintain the well's performance, water quality, longevity of the well, and to prevent costly repairs or complete replacement. Regular water well maintenance and well rehabilitation not only extend the lifespan of wells but also prevent common issues that can lead to costly repairs. Annual water well maintenance is a proactive step to ensure adequate water flow and continued drinking water safety. This RFP was to be for a three-year contract for Water Well Maintenance Services and Pump and Motor Repairs.
Discussion : None.
Action Taken : City Council authorize d the distribution of a Request for Proposals (RFP) for Water Well Maintenance Services and Pump and Motor Repairs for the Utilities Division with proposals due no later than 4:00 p.m. on September 25, 2025; and, direct ed staff to undertake the steps needed to finalize Council ’s action.
Vote: Moved: ANDRADE-STADLER Seconded: MALONEY
Ayes: ANDRADE-STADLER, WANG, MALONEY, MAZA, LEE
Noes: NONE
Absent: NONE
13 8-25 -25
9. AUTHORIZE RFP: CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION
SERVICES FOR ALHAMBRA LIT CROSSWALK TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES PROJECT – F2M22-56, RFP2M25-16
On December 9, 2024, the City Council approved the circulation of the Notice of Inviting Bids for construction of the Alhambra Active Transportation Program (ATP), Lit Crosswalk Traffic Control Devices. The project consist ed of Lit Crosswalk Traffic Control Devices improvements at the following proposed locations: Main/Meridian; Valley/Monterey; Main/Marguerita; Chapel/Elgin; Main/Curtis; Valley/Date; Main/Vega; Main/Olive; and, Valley/Primrose.
Pursuant to the project, staff sought authorization to distribute a R equest for Proposals (R FP ) for Construction Management and Construction Inspection Services.
Discussion : None.
Action Taken : City Council authorize d the distribution of a Request for Proposals (RFP) for Construction Management and Construction Inspection Services for the Alhambra Active Transportation Program Lit Crosswalk Traffic Control Devices Project with proposals due no later than 4:00 p.m. on September 25, 2025.
Vote: Moved: ANDRADE-STADLER Seconded: MALONEY
Ayes: ANDRADE-STADLER, WANG, MALONEY, MAZA, LEE
Noes: NONE
Absent: NONE
10. AWARD CONTRACT: PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE CITY ’S HISTORIC PRESERVATION PROGRAM – F2M25-38, RFP2M25-8, C2M25- 38 , M2M25- 126
On May 12, 2025, the City Council authorized the distribution of a Request for Proposals (RFP) for professional consulting to assist in the administration of the City ’s Historic Preservation Program, and staffing of the City ’s Historic Preservation Commission. The City received four proposals by the close of the RFP deadline on July 24, 2025. Staff evaluated the four proposals and interviewed each of the consulting firms during the week of August 4, 2025. The proposals were reviewed and evaluated based on requirements outlined in the RFP, which included, but were not limited to, the understanding of the project scope, methodology, and approach, and specialized experience in historic preservation. After consideration, HRG was selected as the most qualified consultant. HRG brought over 35 years of experience as a historic preservation consulting firm devoted exclusively to providing historic preservation planning, architectural consultation, and development services. HRG demonstrated its expertise by preparing Alhambra ’s Historic Context Statement, conducting a Citywide Historic Resources Survey, and drafting the City ’s first Historic Preservation Ordinance. They also provided services in various capacities for the Cities of Pasadena, Pomona, Temple City, Glendale, Ventura, Riverside, Beverly Hills, Santa Monica, and Los Angeles, to name a few.
Discussion : None.
Action Taken : City Council award ed a contract to Historic Resources Group, subject to final language approval by the City Manager and City Attorney, in the not to exceed amount of $951,100 for five years through 2030 with an option for two five-year terms for professional consulting services to assist in the administration of the City ’s Historic Preservation Program, including staffing the City ’s Historic Preservation Commission; and, direct ed staff to undertake the steps necessary to finalize the City Council ’s action. ( M2M25-126 ) 14 8-25 -25
Vote: Moved: ANDRADE-STADLER Seconded: MALONEY
Ayes: ANDRADE-STADLER, WANG, MALONEY, MAZA, LEE
Noes: NONE
Absent: NONE
11. RESOLUTION: AUTHORIZATION FOR THE CITY MANAGER TO ACCEPT ON BEHALF
OF THE CITY THE CALTRANS SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (STPL) FUNDS – F2M25- 48 , R2M25-33
The City of Alhambra has been notified the Poplar Boulevard Street Rehabilitation Project that was submitted under STPL has been approved in the amount of $238,000. The project involve d paving Poplar from Main Street to Fremont Ave., some sidewalk repairs and the installation of ADA ramps. The Federal Funds for the Project would be distributed through the California Department of Transportation and Los Angeles County MTA. The contract documents require d the City Council to adopt a resolution designating an official to execute the agreements and supporting documents. Staff recommended the City Council designate the City Manager.
Discussion : None.
Action Taken : City Council adopt ed Resolution No. R2M25-33 entitled: A Resolution of the Alhambra City Council authorizing the City Manager to act on behalf of the City of Alhambra with respect to the Surface Transportation Program (STPL) Transportation Funds administered through the California Department of Transportation and Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) ; and, direct ed staff to undertake the steps necessary to finalize Council ’s action.
Vote: Moved: ANDRADE-STADLER Seconded: MALONEY
Ayes: ANDRADE-STADLER, WANG, MALONEY, MAZA, LEE
Noes: NONE
Absent: NONE
1 2 . ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY ACT (CEQA) INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (IS/MND) FOR THE GREEN STREET DEMONSTRATION PROJECT ON MAIN STREET; AUTHORIZE STAFF TO EXECUTE THE NOTICE OF DETERMINATION (NOD); AND
AUTHORIZE STAFF TO DISTRIBUTE A NOTICE INVITING BIDS (NIB) FOR CONSTRUCTION – F2M23-56 , R2M25-30, N2M25- 1 07 , M2M25-127 The Green Street Demonstration Project, which include d the installation of onsite stormwater capture, retention, reuse, and infiltration, is identified as a priority concept in the City ’s Stormwater Master Plan. The Stormwater Master Plan was developed in order to comply with the Safe Clean Water Program ’s stringent funding requirements by implementing a cost- effective strategy to identify opportunities for stormwater projects and prioritize the planning process. A feasibility study was completed and funded by the Safe Clean Water Technical Resources Program in order to prepare the Project for the design phase. In collaboration with the Project consultant (CWE), staff conducted five educational outreach presentations to the Alhambra community and held an additional workshop to discuss the CEQA IS/MND. The Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) and Notice of Intent to Adopt an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration were posted on the City ’s website and were made available for public review at City Hall, Alhambra Library, and the City ’s Police Department from March 6, 2025 – April 6, 2025. The Notice of Intent to adopt an IS/MND and public meeting notice (hearing) were also posted at City Hall for public review on March 3, 2025 and 15 8-25 -25
published in the Pasadena Star News on Tuesday, March 4, 2025, in accordance with CEQA.
Further compliance measures included the hearing in the form of a community meeting held on March 13, 2025. This meeting provided a public forum to discuss the project, IS/MND, and potential environmental impacts. Questions raised at the meeting were answered and concerns regarding parking, bus stops, and traffic patterns were addressed. Three comment letters on the proposed IS/MND were also received by the City before the end of the 30-day public review period on April 6, 2025. All actions required to be taken by applicable law related to the preparation, circulation, and review of the proposed IS/MND have been taken. A final IS/MND has been prepared consisting of the proposed IS/MND, all comments received during the public review period, and responses to all environmental impacts raised during the public review period. This final Initial S tudy /M itigated N egative D eclaration is posted on the City ’s websit e : https://www.alhambraca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/6698/_Final-MND Discussion: None.
Action Taken : City Council adopt ed Resolution No. R2M25-30 entitled: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Alhambra adopting the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Green Street Demonstration on Main Street Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and authorizing staff to execute the Notice of Determination ; approv e the Green Street Demonstration Project on Main Street ; authorize d staff to execute the Notice of Determination (NOD) ; authorize d staff to distribute a Notice Inviting Bids (NIB) for construction ; and , direct ed staff to undertake the steps necessary to finalize the Council ’s action. ( M2M25-127 )
Vote: Moved: ANDRADE-STADLER Seconded: MALONEY
Ayes: ANDRADE-STADLER, WANG, MALONEY, MAZA, LEE
Noes: NONE
Absent: NONE
13. APPROVE CHANGE ORDER: ROOF REPLACEMENT AT ALHAMBRA FIRE STATION 72 – F2M24-24, C2M25-22, M2M25- 128
On May 12, 2025, the City Council approved an award of c ontract to Rainy Day Roofing, Inc. for the Roof Replacement project at Alhambra Fire Station 72 in an amount not to exceed $140,429.58. When Rainy Day Roofing, Inc. started the work, they submitted Change Order No. 1 for all the wood and lumber that needed to be replaced upon inspection of the wood substrate during the pre-construction walk . Change Order No. 1 was in the amount of $17,780.00 and was previously approved. Subsequently, when the roof tiles were delivered, they were not the same as the existing roof tiles. It was discovered that in the scope of work developed by Weatherweld, the specifications asked for a one-layer flat tile versus the two - piece clay tile. As a result, a change order was necessary to match the same roof tiles to preserve the same look. The total amount for Change Order No. 2 is $94,394.21. With Change Order No. 1 and the approval of Change Order No. 2, the original contract amount of $140,429.58 will be increased by $112,174.21.
Discussion: None.
Action Taken : City Council approve d Change Order No. 2 for the Roof Replacement Project at Alhambra Fire Station 72, increasing Contract No. C2M25-22 with Rainy Day Roofing, Inc. by $94,394.21, bringing the total revised contract value to an amount not to exceed $252,603.79 and if approved, authorize d a contract amendment in the amount of $94,394.21 for additional materials and labor, subject to approval by the City Manager and City Attorney; and, direct ed staff to undertake the steps necessary to finalize Council ’s action. (M2M25-128 )
16 8-25 -25
Vote: Moved: ANDRADE-STADLER Seconded: MALONEY
Ayes: ANDRADE-STADLER, WANG, MALONEY, MAZA, LEE
Noes: NONE
Absent: NONE
14. APPROVE CHANGE ORDER S : ROOF REPLACEMENT AT ALHAMBRA FIRE STATION 74 – F2M24-36, C2M25-21, M2M25- 129
On May 12, 2025, the City Council approved an award of contract to Superior Roofing Systems, Inc. for the Roof Replacement project at Alhambra Fire Station 74 in an amount not to exceed $125,256.00. Prior to the start date of the project, staff learned the roof tiles that were identified in the scope of work developed by Weatherweld asked for a one-layer tile instead of the two -piece clay tile currently on the building. As a result, a change order was necessary to match the same roof tiles and preserve the same look of the roof . Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $45,360 is the difference in price as a result of the change in the roof material. Furthermore, during the inspection and when work started, the contractor discovered additional plywood and insulation damage caused by termites. Thus, Change Order Nos. 2 and 3 were submitted for the plywood replacement in the upper deck and perimeter edge.
The total amount was $51,360.00.
Discussion: None.
Action Taken : City Council approve d Change Order Nos. 1, 2, and 3 for the Roof Replacement Project at Alhambra Fire Station 74, increasing Contract No. C2M25-21 with Superior Roofing Systems, Inc. by $96,720.00, bringing the total revised contract value to an amount not to exceed $221,796.00 and if approved, authorize a contract amendment in the amount of $96,720.00 for additional materials and labor, subject to approval by the City Manager and City Attorney; and, direct ed staff to undertake the steps necessary to finalize Council ’s action. ( M2M25-129 )
Vote: Moved: ANDRADE-STADLER Seconded: MALONEY
Ayes: ANDRADE-STADLER, WANG, MALONEY, MAZA, LEE
Noes: NONE
Absent: NONE
1 5 . TREASURER ’S REPORT – F2M25-1
Discussion: None.
Action Taken : City Council receive d and file d as submitted the Treasurer's Report prepared by the Director of Finance for the month of Ju ly 2025, listing all of the City's investments as of Ju ly 31 , 2025.
Vote: Moved: ANDRADE-STADLER Seconded: MALONEY
Ayes: ANDRADE-STADLER, WANG, MALONEY, MAZA, LEE
Noes: NONE
Absent: NONE
1 6 . MINUTES
Discussion: None.
17 8-25 -25
Action Taken : City Council review and approve as submitted the Minutes of the June 23 , 2025 regular meeting of the City Council and the July 28 , 2025 special meeting of the City Council.
Vote: Moved: ANDRADE-STADLER Seconded: MALONEY
Ayes: ANDRADE-STADLER, WANG, MALONEY, MAZA, LEE
Noes: NONE
Absent: NONE
1 7 . PERSONNEL ACTIONS – F2M25-2
Discussion: None.
Action Taken : City Council ratif ied the actions of the City Manager set forth in that certain Personnel Actions document dated August 25 , 2025 showing the various appointments, classifications, salary changes, etc., since the last City Council meeting.
Vote: Moved: ANDRADE-STADLER Seconded: MALONEY
Ayes: ANDRADE-STADLER, WANG, MALONEY, MAZA, LEE
Noes: NONE
Absent: NONE
1 8 . DEMANDS - F2M2 5 -1
Discussion: None.
Action Taken : City Council approve d as submitted Final Check List (259692 thru 259880 ) in the amount of $ 1,683,249.08 for the period ending June 26 , 2025 and Schedule of Wire Transfers in the amount of $ 14,677,634.10 for the week ending June 19 , 2025 ; Final Check List (9460 thru 9473 ) in the amount of $ 825.00 for the period ending June 30 , 2025; Final Check List (259881 thru 260051 and 260052 thru 260060 ) in the amount of $ 63,986.92 for the period ending Ju ly 1 , 2025; Final Check List (2 60162 thru 260167 ) in the amount $ 50,039.98 ; Final Check List (260061 thru 260161 ) in the amount of $ 483,790.72 for the period ending July 2 , 2025 and Schedule of Wire Transfers in the amount of $1,186,817.00 for the week ending June 27, 2025 ; Final Check List (260168 thru 260280 ) in the amount of $ 722,536.09 for the period ending July 10 , 2025 ; Final Check List (260281 thru 260333) in the amount of $2,525,438.05 for the period ending July 10, 2025 and Schedule of Wire Transfers in the amount of $5,178,330.94 for the week ending July 4, 2025; Final Check List (260473 thru 260532) in the amount of $2,138,124.75 for the period ending July 17, 2025 and Schedule of Wire Transfers in the amount of $944,251.86 for the week ending July 11, 2025; Final Check List (2600334 thru 260472) in the amount of $1,736,041.03 for the period ending July 17, 2025; and, Final Check List (9483 thru 9499) in the amount of $1,070,00 for the period ending July 22, 2025 .
Vote: Moved: ANDRADE-STADLER Seconded: MALONEY
Ayes: ANDRADE-STADLER, WANG, MALONEY, MAZA, LEE
Noes: NONE
Absent: NONE
PUBLIC COMMENT FOR NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS CONTINUED – F2M25-4 Lewis McCAMMON, 105 N. Cordova St., discussed AB 2097 and 2022 as discussed by the Planning Commission.
18 8-25 -25
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (ANNOUNCEMENTS & FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS) – F2M2 5 -7 Councilmember ANDRADE-STADLER addressed speakers ’ concerns regarding emailing Councilmembers and requested staff review the removal of the stop sign on Hellman Avenue . She informed the public of the “Go Alhambra ” app and recommended that more information be provided on the Utility bill for residents.
ADJOURNMENT : At 12:33 a .m. on August 26, 2025, there being no further business for the Council to transact, the Mayor, with the consent of the City Council, adjourned the meeting to the next regular meeting of the Alhambra City Council scheduled for Monday, September 8, 2025 at 6:00 p.m.
LAUREN MYLES, CMC
CITY CLERK
by
BRIANNA LAMB MCCARTHY
ASSISTANT CITY CLERK