Cities Index.
Minutes, regular meeting

Alhambra City Council
May 11, 2026

Document
Minutes, regular meeting
Meeting
May 11, 2026
Body
Alhambra City Council
Original file
278 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on www.alhambraca.gov. That file is the official record.

1 5-11-26

MINUTES
Regular Meeting

ALHAMBRA CITY COUNCIL
Council Chambers, 111 South First Street
May 11, 2026
6:00 p.m.

ROLL CALL: At 6:09 p.m., on Monday, May 11, 2026, the Alhambra City Council met in the Council Chambers of Alhambra City Hall.

PRESENT: LEE, MAZA, WANG, ANDRADE-STADLER, MALONEY
ABSENT: NONE
Officials Present: City Manager Binnquist, Assistant City Manager Garcia, City Attorney Montes, Assistant City Clerk Lamb McCarthy, Director of Parks and Recreation Macias, Director of Finance Lieu, Director of Community Development Ho, Associate Planner Vargas, Director of Public Works and Utilities Ahlen, Chief of Fire Department Ragusa, Chief of Police Kennedy, Director of Library Services LohGuan, Director of Human Resources Ko, Management Analyst Alvarez
FLAG SALUTE: Led by Mayor Maloney
LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: We acknowledge that the land on which we are gathered is the traditional, ancestral, and unceded territory of the Gabrielino/Tongva peoples. We seek to prioritize respect for the historic culture and contemporary presence of the native peoples throughout California, especially in the greater Los Angeles/Alhambra area. We come with respect and gratitude for the Gabrielino/Tongva people who still consider themselves the caretakers of this land. It is through their examples that we are reminded of our greater responsibility to take care of Mother Earth and to take care of each other.

CEREMONIAL

1. PROCLAMATION: ASIAN AMERICAN NATIVE HAWAIIAN PACIFIC ISLANDER HERITAGE MONTH – F2M26-3
City Council ratified the action of Mayor Maloney in proclaiming May 2026 as Asian American Native Hawaiian Pacific Islander Heritage Month in Alhambra.

PUBLIC COMMENT FOR NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS (TIME LIMITATIONS: 3 MINUTES PER SPEAKER, 30 MINUTES TOTAL)
1) Caleb Kwok spoke against a 48-unit apartment development at 824 W. Hellman Ave., Monterey Park.
2) Kven Lee spoke against a 48-unit apartment development at 824 W. Hellman Ave., Monterey Park.
3) Carolyn Johansen spoke against a 48-unit apartment development at 824 W. Hellman Ave., Monterey Park.
2 5-11-26
4) Martha Yoselentz spoke against a 48-unit apartment development at 824 W. Hellman Ave., Monterey Park.
5) Bruce Mok spoke against a 48-unit apartment development at 824 W. Hellman Ave., Monterey Park.
6) Fidel Moreno, representing Silverstone Property Management, spoke about property management services.
7) Lewis McCammon discussed the recent Planning Commission meeting regarding 234 S.

Marguerita Ave. and historic preservation
8) David Bond, via Zoom, spoke against Flock, Automated License Plate Recognition Software, and any new Police positions created.
9) Chris Olsen, via Zoom, discussed the recent Planning Commission meeting regarding 234 S. Marguerita Ave. and historic preservation.
10) Wzixiang Zhu, via Mandarin translator, spoke against a 48-unit apartment development at 824 W. Hellman Ave., Monterey Park.

PUBLIC HEARING

2. PUBLIC HEARING TO ADOPT ORDINANCE O2M26-4863 APPROVING ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT AMD-26-04 MAKING GENERAL CLARIFYING UPDATES TO THE CITY’S ZONING CODE; AND DETERMINE THIS ACTION IS EXEMPT FROM CEQA – F2M20-24, N2M26-46, O2M26-4863
Associate Planner VARGAS presented Notice No. N2M26-46 for the City Council to hold a public hearing to consider an ordinance approving a Zoning Text Amendment amending various sections of Title 23 (Zoning) of the Alhambra Municipal Code, as well as adding new sections, to address new State legislation, eliminate inconsistencies, clarify ambiguous provisions, correct typographical and formatting errors, and modify use allowances. This is a City-initiated application. From time-to-time updates are made to the Alhambra Municipal Code (AMC) to address new State legislation, clarify ambiguous provisions, or delete outdated language. While some of these changes require immediate consideration by the Council, most can be addressed periodically. Accordingly, staff brings a code clean-up ordinance to the Council on an annual basis to address modifications needed due to new legislation, as well as other suggested clarifying changes. Clean-ups to the Zoning Code are processed separately from clean-ups to the rest of the AMC as Planning Commission review is required for Zoning and General Plan Amendments.

Similar to prior clean-ups, this update would address new State legislation, eliminate inconsistencies, and create greater clarity in implementing the Zoning Code. This Zoning Code clean-up included both proposed amendments and additions. Amendments consisted of revisions to existing sections of the AMC, while additions incorporated entirely new sections into the AMC. The nature of and reasoning for each proposed amendment and addition could be classified by five (5) general categories: 1.) Clarification; 2.) Consistency; 3.) Compliance with State laws/Federal laws; 4.) Typographical & Formatting; and 5.) Use Allowances & Regulations. Some of the proposed amendments and additions were a combination of these five categories. In Attachment 1 of the staff 3 5-11-26
report for this item, each proposed amendment/addition was briefly described in a table, which included a breakdown of the categories applicable to each amendment/addition. All of the proposed amendments and additions were reviewed for consistency with the City’s General Plan, as required by AMC Section 23.40.080 (General Plan Consistency Required for Zoning Amendments).

At their April 6, 2026 regular meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed amendments and additions in Ordinance No. O2M26-4863, and adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 26-02 by a vote of 7-0, recommending the City Council approve Zoning Text Amendment AMD-26-04, with one minor revision to verbiage for tandem parking standards (incorporated at the recommendation of staff) and a request to verify accuracy of language included in two sections pertaining to Urban Dwelling Units (SB 9 Units). The recommendations by the Planning Commission were listed in Planning Commission Resolution No. 26-02, which was Attachment 3 of the staff report for this item, and appropriate revisions were incorporated into Ordinance No. O2M26-4863.

The City reviewed the environmental impacts of this Ordinance under the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq. “CEQA”) and the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 Cal. Code of Regs. §§ 15000, et seq., the “CEQA Guidelines”). This Ordinance was not subject to further review environmental review because: (1) it would not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15060(c)(2); (2) there was no possibility that this Ordinance would have a significant effect on the environment (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15061(b)(3)); and (3) the Ordinance, by itself, does not constitute a “project” as defined in section 21065 of the Public Resources Code and the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15378). It could be seen with certainty that there was no possibility that this Ordinance would have a significant effect on the environment.

Open Public Hearing: Mayor Maloney opened the public hearing.

Public Comment:
1) Brian Maida expressed concerns regarding the recent zoning amendments, noting that the smoke shop would cease operations due to the new zoning requirements, highlighting businesses were not involved early in the decision-making process and urged the City Council to reconsider these standards.
2) Sara Durghalli raised objections to the vape and smoke shop regulations, due to the insufficient public noticing timelines and the additional requirements on the current business.
3) Scott Abdulhai concerned on impact of current businesses and transparency of the noticing to businesses.
4) Lewis McCammon commented that AB130, noting his understanding on state mandated laws but recommended that public hearings remain accessible to ensure transparency and community involvement.

Close Public Hearing: After receiving public comment, Mayor Maloney closed the public hearing.
4 5-11-26
Discussion: Vice Mayor Andrade-Stadler received clarification on the three-year period to implement the proposed changes.

Councilmember WANG supported implementing restrictions on data centers and emphasized the buffer requirement for vape and smoke shops, mandating that these businesses be spaced at least 600 feet apart, with a minimum separation of 1,000 feet to maintain distinction between them. She recommended that applications for Conditional Use Permits be processed within three years to ensure compliance for continued operation. Businesses that fail to meet the distance requirements after this period should be subject to closure.

Councilmember LEE spoke in opposition of allowing vape and smoke shops within the City, and urged for the City Council to include grocery stores and other retail outlets within this requirement to limit the amount of buffer areas available for additional business to come in.

Council Member MAZA expressed opposition to the proposed requirement requiring relocation of vape and smoke shops within three years and discussed the new regulations, emphasizing that they should not adversely affect current vape and smoke shops if there are no performance concerns. The proposal aims to ensure that businesses continue to operate in accordance with established performance standards.

Mayor MALONEY spoke on the proposal to utilize a Director’s hearing, which aims to increase efficiency of approval timelines, as the director is able to hold more hearings over the Planning Commission meetings that are held twice a month. The directors hearing would still require proper noticing of the affect residence and news paper posting requirements. He wasn't aware that some smoke shops may need to close and is concerned about the current 5 businesses operating under existing regulations.

Vice Mayor ANDRADE-STADLER proposed reviewing a performance report on the current businesses to help identify a balance approach that support existing establishments.

Mayor MALONEY noted that if the City Council's goal is to prohibit smoke and vape shops, it should be reflected in the ordinances rather than focusing on increasing buffer zones or adding additional businesses within the designated areas.

City Attorney Villegas clarified the City Council could: Businesses that are in compliance will be grandfathered and required to go through the CUP process, thus becoming legally non-conforming uses. If any businesses were cited, they should be addressed accordingly.

Action Taken: City Council took the following actions:
1) Directed the City Attorney to introduce and give first reading by title, only waiving further reading to Ordinance entitled:

Ordinance No. O2M26-4863: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Alhambra adopting Zoning Text Amendment AMD-26-04, amending the Alhambra Municipal Code to address new state laws, eliminate inconsistencies, clarify ambiguous provisions, correct typographical and formatting errors, and modify use 5 5-11-26
allowances
with the amendment for Smoke and Vape provisions, allowing existing businesses to operate under a CUP, to be obtained within a three years period and subject to a compliant performance review, and removing buffer restrictions. Additionally, no longer permitting smoke and vape retail shops in Alhambra.
which ordinance shall return for a second reading and adoption at the next City Council meeting on June 22, 2026; and,
2) Determined the action was exempt from CEQA.

Vote: Moved: LEE Seconded: MAZA
Ayes: MAZA, LEE, WANG, MALONEY, ANDRADE-STADLER
Noes: NONE

Absent: NONE

3. PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE & IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 2026- 2027 RENEWAL – F2M26-28, N2M26-51, R2M26-13
Director of Public Works and Utilities AHLEN delivered a staff report. This was the time and place set by Notice No. N2M26-51 for the City Council to hold a public hearing to consider the following:

A. The Public Works Maintenance and Improvement District No. 1 - Zone A includes the downtown area only and was established to provide a source of funding to operate and maintain specialized improvements. Those improvements include items such as decorative sidewalk planters, landscape medians, decorative sidewalk and paving and the Washington Twin streetlights. This assessment is proposed to be unchanged from the 2025-26 level; and,
B. The Public Works Maintenance and Improvement District No. 1 - Zone B was established to fund debt service on a bond issue and ongoing maintenance and operation of the City’s streetlights, sidewalks, curb and gutters, streets, street trees, median landscaping and municipal parking lots and structures. The work is performed by a combination of a concrete crew, a two-person electrical crew (who also maintain traffic signals), an asphalt crew, and contractors. This assessment is proposed to be unchanged from the 2025-26 level; and,
C. The Public Works Maintenance and Improvement District No. 1 - Zone C was established in 1987 and includes generally those properties located on both sides of Main Street, between Atlantic and Palm, and on both sides of Palm, between Main and Commonwealth. The purpose of Zone C is to provide funding for the ongoing maintenance and operation of the public improvements, which were constructed in the Auto Row area and include the grass parkway, the feature lights between Atlantic and Olive, and the street trees. This assessment is proposed to be unchanged from the 2025-26 level.

Opened & Closed the Public Hearing: Mayor MALONEY opened the public hearing and as there was no one present who wished to speak, closed the same.

Discussion: Vice Mayor ANDRADE-STADLER motioned to approve the 6 5-11-26
resolution. Councilmember WANG and City Attorney MONTES discussed the process to increase fee rates. Mr. AHLEN provided further clarification regarding the current funding level. Ms. WANG supported the resolution, and suggested that the City could reconsider increasing the fees in time. Mayor MALONEY supported a future review of the rates.

Action Taken: City Council adopted Resolution No. R2M26-13 entitled: A Resolution of the Alhambra City Council ordering the renewal of the City of Alhambra Public Works Maintenance and Improvements District No. 1 for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 confirming the Assessment Diagram and Assessment therefor and providing for the Assessment Levy in connection therewith renewing the Public Works Maintenance and Improvement District for the 2026-2027 Fiscal year at the same rates since 1996-97; and, directed staff to undertake the steps necessary to finalize Council’s action.

Vote: Moved: ANDRADE-STADLER Seconded: WANG
Ayes: ANDRADE-STADLER, LEE, MAZA, WANG, MALONEY
Noes: NONE

Absent: NONE

4. PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) AND HOME PROGRAMS 2026-2027 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN) – F2M26-30, N2M26- 35, M2M26-70
Management Analyst ALVAREZ delivered a staff report. This was the time and place set by Notice No. N2M26-35 for the City Council to hold a public hearing regarding Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME funding for the City of Alhambra’s proposed 2026-2027 Annual Action Plan to receive comment pursuant to and in compliance with the Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) pre-submission requirements as outlined in Section 24 Part 91 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

The City adopts a one-year Action Plan that outlines specific program activities and funding allocations for the upcoming program year using CDBG and HOME funds, in accordance with HUD requirements. The Action Plan is developed in alignment with the City’s five-year Consolidated Plan that was adopted in FY 2025-2026. HUD has officially notified the City of its funding allocations for FY 2026-2027. The City of Alhambra would receive approximately $823,981 in CDBG funds, an increase of $8,181 from prior year, and $395,699.04 in HOME funds, a decrease of $8,584.28 from prior year’s allocation.

The Proposed Work Program for CDBG funds for FY 2026-2027 were presented in two alternative schedules based on the approval status of a Section 108 Loan to assist in building the community center: Under Schedule A, the City anticipated the approval of a Section 108 Loan, which would result in the allocation of $318,000.00 toward the first-year loan repayment obligation. As a result, funding available for direct program activities was adjusted accordingly. Under Schedule B, if the Section 108 Loan was not approved, no debt service payment would be required. As a result, the funding originally designated for loan repayment was reallocated to Housing Rehabilitation and Code Enforcement. The use of Schedule B would not constitute a substantial amendment to the Annual Action Plan. The complete breakdown of funding allocations for the Proposed Work Program (CDBG) Schedule A, Proposed Work Program (CDBG) Schedule B, and Proposed Work Program (HOME) were outlined in the May 11, 2026 staff report by the Assistant City Manager and Management Analyst.

As part of the citizen participation process for the Annual Action Plan, the City conducted two interactive pre-planning sessions with the HCDA Citizen Advisory Committee on 7 5-11-26
February 3, 2026, and April 7, 2026. These sessions focused on identifying funding priorities and developing program recommendations. To ensure broad community input, the City extended invitations to 110 community organizations serving low- and moderateincome populations, as well as to neighboring jurisdictions to the April 7, 2026 meeting.

The HCDA Citizen Advisory Committee reviewed the draft Annual Action Plan on May 5, 2026, and unanimously recommended it be approved by Council.

Open Public Hearing: Mayor Maloney opened the public hearing.

Public Comment: Lewis McCammon discussed the process for the Annual Action Plan and the role of the HCDA Citizen Advisory Committee.

Close Public Hearing: After receiving public comment, Mayor Maloney closed the public hearing.

Discussion: None.

Action Take: City Council approved the proposed FY 2026- 2027 Annual Action Plan for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Investment Partnerships programs, and authorized staff to submit these plans to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). (M2M26-70)
Vote: Moved: ANDRADE-STADLER Seconded: WANG
Ayes: MAZA, WANG, ANDRADE-STADLER, LEE, MALONEY
Noes: NONE

Absent: NONE

PRESENTATIONS

5. AMENDED BUDGET REVIEW AND RESOLUTION ADOPTING FY 2026-27 BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS – F2M25-17, R2M26-12
Director of Finance LIEU delivered the presentation and staff report. On June 23, 2025, the City Council adopted the Fiscal Years 2025-26 and 2026-27 Budget. On February 23, 2026, the Mid-Year Budget Review was presented, and the City Council approved the recommended budget adjustments for Fiscal Year 2025-26. Since then, staff has continued to monitor revenues and expenditures and is now presenting the Amended Budget Review to update the City’s financial projections and appropriations for Fiscal Year 2026-27. Fiscal Year 2025-26 ended with an unappropriated surplus of $2,007,354, primarily attributable to higher-than-anticipated revenues. These increases were driven by stronger-than-projected property tax receipts resulting from rising assessed values, CPI adjustments, and property reassessments, as well as growth in service charges, grant reimbursements, and interest earnings. These gains were partially offset by declines in sales tax revenues and transfers supporting capital improvement projects. For Fiscal Year 2026-27, staff presents an Amended General Fund Budget reflecting a projected deficit of $1,482,209. When combined with the Fiscal Year 2025-26 surplus, the overall unappropriated surplus is $525,145. Historically, such surpluses have been allocated to priority needs, including reserve contributions, capital repair and replacement, pension and retirement obligations, and the acquisition of essential equipment. Appropriations to these efforts are made through City Council-approved budget adjustments. City Manager BINNQUIST requested Council review the 2026 Strategic Plan Funding Recommendations and provide direction to staff.
8 5-11-26
Discussion: Council provided funding recommendations for 2026 Strategic Plan goals and how to allocate monies from the $525,145.00 surplus. Council had a robust discussion and reached consensus to allocate funds for the following: expand the CERT Program for $500,000.00, upgrade Gateway Plaza, including a landscape plan, for $10,000.00, add funds to Sidewalk Repairs for $150,000.00, add funds to the Sustainability Plan projects for $160,145.00, and add $200,00.00 to the Reserves fund.

City Manager BINNQUIST provided clarification during the discussion as needed.

In their discussion, Council noted the other unfunded Strategic Plan Goals and discussed their importance. Council directed staff to continue to seek additional funding sources. Ms.

BINNQUIST stated that staff would update Council at the mid-year point and would continue seeking grants and not move forward with General Fund money. Ms. LIEU then continued her budget presentation.

Action Taken: City Council received and filed the Amended Budget Review for Fiscal Year 2026-27 and related reports; and, adopted Resolution No. R2M26-12 entitled: A Resolution of the Alhambra City Council adopting Fiscal Years 2025-26 and 2026-27 Budget adjustments of the City of Alhambra, Golf Course Clubhouse Corporation, Alhambra Capital Improvements Corporation, Alhambra Parking Authority, Alhambra Facilities Financing Authority and the Alhambra Public Financing Authority approving the Fiscal Year 2026-27 budget adjustments.

Vote: Moved: MAZA Seconded: ANDRADE-STADLER
Ayes: LEE, ANDRADE-STADLER, WANG, MAZA, MALONEY
Noes: NONE

Absent: NONE
CONSENT AGENDA (Item Nos. 6 – 22): (TIME LIMITATIONS: 5 MINUTES PER SPEAKER FOR ONE ITEM, 10 MINUTES PER SPEAKER FOR 2+ ITEMS)
All items listed under the Consent Agenda, with the exception of Item Nos. 10, 17, 20, 21, and 22, were considered by the City Council to be routine and were enacted by one motion.

6. AWARD CONTRACT: PURCHASE OF CARBON MEDIA FOR THE GROUND WATER TREATMENT PLANT – F2M26-6B, RFP2M26-3, C2M26-26, M2M26-69 On March 23, 2026, the City Council approved distribution of a Request for Proposals for the purchase of carbon filter media for the Ground Water Treatment Plant. On April 23, 2026, two proposals were received. Staff conducted a review and evaluation of the responding proposals and Calgon Carbon Corporation was selected based on their qualifications, standards of quality, capability to deliver product throughout the contract term, third party hauling company’s reputation, flexibility, references and cost of the product. Additionally, Calgon Carbon Corporation provides carbon that is approved by the State of California State Water Resources Control Board - Division of Drinking Water to be used at the City’s Ground Water Treatment Plant.

Discussion: None.

Action Taken: City Council awarded a contract, subject to final language approval by the City Manager and City Attorney, by and between the City of Alhambra and the Calgon Carbon Corporation for the purchase and installation of carbon filter media at the 9 5-11-26
Ground Water Treatment Plant in an amount not to exceed $350,000.00 for one year, with two additional two-year renewal options, for a total amount not to exceed $1,050,000.00 over a three-year period, authorized the City Manager to execute the extensions if the services are satisfactory; and directed staff to undertake the steps necessary to finalize Council's action. (M2M26-69)
Vote: Moved: ANDRADE-STADLER Seconded: LEE
Ayes: LEE, ANDRADE-STADLER, WANG, MAZA, MALONEY
Noes: NONE

Absent: NONE

7. AWARD CONTRACT: PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES FOR PRIORITY PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT – F2M25-62, RFP2M25-26, C2M26-27, M2M26-71
On March 11, 2024, the City Council adopted the City’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvement Plan (“Walk, Bike, Move Alhambra!”), which established a vision for biking and pedestrian infrastructure and facilitates further planning and funding support for the implementation of the City’s multi-modal transportation goals. The City received a Funding Agreement in the amount of $14,387,027.50 in Measure R funds for the Citywide Priority Pedestrian Improvement Project on October 6, 2025. The funding would cover the design, engineering, and construction associated with improving the eight priority pedestrian locations identified in the City’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvement Plan. On December 8, 2025, staff obtained authorization to distribute the Request for Proposals for design engineering services for priority pedestrian improvements. The design engineering service would cover the Project’s Phase 1 PS&E and Phase 2 Preliminary Engineering. Staff received and reviewed four proposals. AYCE Consulting Engineers, Inc. was selected based on their technical approach, project team qualifications, relevant experience, references, and completeness and quality of the proposal.

Discussion: None.

Action Taken: City Council awarded a contract to AYCE Consulting Engineers, Inc., subject to final language approval by the City Manager and City Attorney, in the amount of $878,325.22 for professional engineering design services for the City’s Priority Pedestrian Improvements under the Alhambra Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvement Plan, and directed staff to undertake the steps necessary to finalize the Council’s action. (M2M26-71)
Vote: Moved: ANDRADE-STADLER Seconded: LEE
Ayes: LEE, ANDRADE-STADLER, WANG, MAZA, MALONEY
Noes: NONE

Absent: NONE

8. LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR THE COALITION TO PROTECT COMMUNITY SERVICES – F2M26-19, M2M26-72
On May 4, 2026, the California Joint Power Insurance Authority (CJPIA), reached out to the City requesting support for a new legislative advocacy effort, led by the CJPIA - the Coalition to Protect Community Services. Since 2018, the City has been a member of CJPIA, one of the largest municipal self-insurance pools in the state of California, with more than 125 member cities and public agencies. In recent years, the liability 10 5-11-26
environment for local agencies has become increasingly challenging, with costs rising sharply due to higher claim severity, a more complex litigation landscape, and broader systematic factors affecting CJPIA member agencies and public agencies throughout the state. Rising liability costs are directly impacting local budgets and essential community services, which is why CJPIA sought support for this new legislative advocacy effort. The Coalition would bring cities, counties, schools, special districts and other local agencies together to advocate for a more balanced and sustainable liability environment though targeted reforms to state law. Per CJPIA, the effort is focused on protecting public resources while ensuring fair compensation for people injured by local government negligence.

Discussion: None.

Action Taken: City Council approved the letter of support for the Coalition to Protect Community Services as outlined in the May 11, 2026 staff report by the Director of Human Resources and Risk Management; and, directed staff to undertake the steps necessary to finalize the City Council’s action. (M2M26-72) Vote: Moved: ANDRADE-STADLER Seconded: LEE
Ayes: LEE, ANDRADE-STADLER, WANG, MAZA, MALONEY
Noes: NONE

Absent: NONE

9. APPROVAL OF CONTRACT WITH THE ALHAMBRA CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT ASSOCIATION (ACBDA) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027 – F2M21-50, C2M26-28, M2M26-73
Since 1974, the City has maintained an agreement with the ACBDA to provide promotional support to the merchants in the Alhambra Central Business District of Association. These merchants are assessed in accordance with the Alhambra Municipal Code Section

5.04.201. The City collects the assessment and allocates it for marketing and promotion activities specific to the Business District area. According to the City’s agreement with the ACBDA, a maximum of ninety percent (90%) of the total funds collected each year by the City may be allocated to the ACBDA. The Fiscal Year 2026- 2027 minimum allocation total was estimated to be $85,500. In previous years, the estimated minimum has been exceeded This year, ACBDA requested a $80,000 advance on the agreement. The proposed work plan for 2026-2027 was attached with a focus on branding, events//programing, business support and engagement.

Discussion: None.

Action Taken: City Council awarded a contract to the Alhambra Central Business District Association (ACBDA), subject to final language approval by the City Manager and City Attorney, for the promotion of the Central Business District for the 2026-2027 Fiscal Year; and, directed staff to undertake the steps necessary to finalize the Council’s action. (M2M26-73)
Vote: Moved: ANDRADE-STADLER Seconded: LEE
Ayes: LEE, ANDRADE-STADLER, WANG, MAZA, MALONEY
Noes: NONE

Absent: NONE
11 5-11-26

10. AGREEMENT TO LEASE A PORTION OF THE CITY OF ALHAMBRA’S RAYMOND BASIN WATER RIGHTS TO THE HUNTINGTON LIBRARY – F2M9-62, M2M26-74 The City owns 1031 acre-feet of water rights in the Raymond Basin for Fiscal Year 2025-

26. Respectively, the City pays $36,304.00 in assessment fees (annually) for water rights in the Raymond Basin. While the City does not have an operable production well located in the Raymond Basin, and while the City will not use its Raymond Basin water rights this year (unused water rights are lost each year), the City has the option to lease its water rights to interested parties for a fee. The Huntington Library has offered to lease 100-acre feet of the City’s Raymond Basin rights at $550.00 per acre foot for a total of $55,000.00 for the year.

Public Comment: Adam Bray-Ali, also submitted his comments via email, and requested additional information regarding the item.

City Manager BINNQUIST and Director of Public Works and Utilities AHLEN provided clarification and background of the item.

Discussion: Mayor MALONEY and Councilmember WANG discussed the item with Mr. AHLEN, who provided clarification about fees, water rights, and lease options in future years.

Action Taken: City Council authorized staff to enter into a lease agreement with The Huntington Library, subject to final language approval by the City Manager and City Attorney, for 100 acre-feet of water rights in the Raymond Basin for a total of $55,000.00; authorized the City Manager or designee to sign the lease agreement and related documents; directed the Finance Director to deposit the revenue from said lease into account 401.00.00000.00000.449250; and, directed staff to undertake the steps necessary to finalize Council’s action. (M2M26-74)
Vote: Moved: ANDRADE-STADLER Seconded: MAZA
Ayes: LEE, ANDRADE-STADLER, WANG, MAZA, MALONEY
Noes: NONE

Absent: NONE

11. AWARD CONTRACT: SEWER MAIN REPLACEMENT PROJECT ON GLENAVEN

AVENUE, ORANGE GROVE AVENUE, MIDWICK DRIVE, LA GOLONDRINA AVENUE, AND ROSS AVENUE – F2M24-64, N2M26-29, C2M26-29, M2M26-75 On March 9, 2026, the City Council approved the distribution of Notice Inviting Bids for the Project. On April 23, 2026, seven bids were received and opened by the City Clerk ranging from $2,624,055.52 to $4,718,298.00. GRBCON, Inc. submitted the lowest qualified bid at $2,624,055.52. Staff reviewed the bid submitted by GRBCON, Inc. and found it to be in full compliance and conformance with the project specifications.

Discussion: None.

Action Taken: City Council approved a contract, subject to final language approval by the City Manager and City Attorney, by and between the City of Alhambra and GRBCON, Inc. for the Sewer Replacement Project on Glenaven Avenue, Orange Grove Avenue, Midwick Drive, La Golondrina Avenue, and Ross Avenue in an amount not to 12 5-11-26
exceed $2,624,055.52; directed the Finance Director to appropriate funds in the amount of $1,524,055.22 from the Sewer Fund Balance; and, directed staff to undertake the steps necessary to finalize the Council’s action. (M2M25-75)
Vote: Moved: ANDRADE-STADLER Seconded: LEE
Ayes: LEE, ANDRADE-STADLER, WANG, MAZA, MALONEY
Noes: NONE

Absent: NONE

12. APPROVE AN APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS FOR THE STORY PARK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT – F2M22-37, C2M25-74, M2M26-76
On December 8, 2025, the City Council awarded a contract to Ankor Associates, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $776,930 for the Story Park Improvement Project. At the time, the City anticipated receiving $161,793 in Measure A entitlement funds; however, appropriation of those funds was deferred pending final allocation approval from Los Angeles County. On February 10, 2026, Los Angeles County approved the Measure A allocation in the amount of $138,100. In addition, staff intends to utilize CalRecycle Beverage Container Recycling Grant funds to support the installation of a bottle-filling water station at Story Park. Staff requested the City Council direct the Finance Director to appropriate the necessary Measure A and CalRecycle & Beverage Grant funds to fully support project completion.

Discussion: None.

Action Taken: City Council appropriated funds to the Story Park Improvement Project in an amount not to exceed $147,490 from Cal Recycle & Beverage Grant and Measure A fund; and, directed staff to undertake the steps necessary to finalize the Council’s action. (M2M26-76)
Vote: Moved: ANDRADE-STADLER Seconded: LEE
Ayes: LEE, ANDRADE-STADLER, WANG, MAZA, MALONEY
Noes: NONE

Absent: NONE

13. RESOLUTION APPROVING A REVISED COMPREHENSIVE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) WITH THE ALHAMBRA POLICE OFFICERS’
ASSOCIATION (APOA) – F2M26-2, R2M26-14, C87-16C, M2M26-77 Previously, the City Council approved a revised MOU between the City and APOA on April 28, 2025. Periodically, the need will arise to update and/or revise existing MOU language in order to clarify benefits or revise MOU language for compliance purposes. Changes proposed included: revision to language to death benefits for APOA members; revision to language pertaining to uniform allowance and cleaning; and, addition of Senior Detective premium pay. These changes were reviewed and approved by the APOA.

Discussion: None.

Action Taken: City Council adopted Resolution No. R2M26-14 entitled: A Resolution of the Alhambra City Council approving a revised Comprehensive Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Alhambra and the Alhambra Police Officers’ Association that included clarifying language for existing benefits, revision of 13 5-11-26
existing language for CalPERS compliance purposes and the addition of one new special assignment pay benefit; and, directed staff to undertake the steps necessary to finalize Council’s action. (M2M26-77)
Vote: Moved: ANDRADE-STADLER Seconded: LEE
Ayes: LEE, ANDRADE-STADLER, WANG, MAZA, MALONEY
Noes: NONE

Absent: NONE

14. RESOLUTION APPROVING A REVISED COMPREHENSIVE MEMORANDUM OF

UNDERSTANDING (MOU) WITH THE ALHAMBRA POLICE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION (APMA) – F2M26-2, R2M26-15, C2M11-32, M2M26-78 Previously, the City Council approved a revised MOU between the City and APMA on August 26, 2024. Periodically, the need will arise to update and/or revise existing MOU language in order to clarify benefits or revise MOU language for compliance purposes.

Changes proposed included: revision to language to death benefits for APMA members; revision to language pertaining to uniform allowance and cleaning; and, addition of one Assistant Police Chief and decrease of one Police Lieutenant. These changes were reviewed and approved by the APMA.

Discussion: None.

Action Taken: City Council took the following actions: 1) Adopted Resolution No.

R2M26-15 entitled: A Resolution of the Alhambra City Council approving a revised Comprehensive Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Alhambra and the Alhambra Police Management Association that includes clarifying language for existing benefits, revision of existing language for CalPERS compliance purposes and the addition of one Assistant Police Chief; and, directed staff to undertake the steps necessary to finalize Council’s action. (M2M26-78)
Vote: Moved: ANDRADE-STADLER Seconded: LEE
Ayes: LEE, ANDRADE-STADLER, WANG, MAZA, MALONEY
Noes: NONE

Absent: NONE

15. AWARD CONTRACT: PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES TO PREPARE A

FEASIBILITY STUDY ON THE CREATION OF A BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT

DISTRICT (BID) OR A PROPERTY AND BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PBID) – F2M25-61, RFP2M25-25, C2M26-30, M2M26-79
On December 8, 2025, the City Council authorized the distribution of a Request for Proposals (RFP) to prospective firms and consultants to conduct create a feasibility study for a Business Improvement District (BID) or a Property and Business Improvement District (PBID) within Downtown Alhambra. Prospective consultants were given until March 19, 2026 to submit proposals to the City. The City received four (4) proposals. Staff evaluated all proposals, interviewed three proposers through the week of April 27, 2026 and selected Civitas and CSS as the most qualified consultant. Staff reviewed and evaluated the proposals based on the RFP requirements, which included understanding of the project scope, approach and methodology, experience with community outreach and creation of BID/PBID districts, and project cost.
14 5-11-26
Discussion: None.

Action Taken: City Council awarded a contract, in an amount not-to-exceed $86,525, to Civitas Advisors (Civitas) and Community Strong Strategies (CSS), subject to final language approval by the City Manager and City Attorney, to create a feasibility study for a Business Improvement District (BID) or a Property and Business Improvement District (PBID) within Downtown Alhambra; and directed staff to undertake the steps necessary to finalize the Council’s action. (M2M26-79)
Vote: Moved: ANDRADE-STADLER Seconded: LEE
Ayes: LEE, ANDRADE-STADLER, WANG, MAZA, MALONEY
Noes: NONE

Absent: NONE

16. RENEWAL OF MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE ALHAMBRA

UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT (AUSD) FOR SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICERS FOR FY 2026-27 – F2M20-57, C2M20-37, M2M26-80
Both the Alhambra Police Department and AUSD believe that the continuation of the School Resource Officer (SRO) Program would further the goal of maintaining a safe school environment for students and staff. The existing MOU with AUSD for an SRO Program would expire on June 30, 2026. Renewing this MOU would provide police officers to the District during the academic school year calendar through June 30, 2027. AUSD would reimburse the City for services in an amount not to exceed $526,248.00 annually.

Time was charged by itemized timecard hourly and billed to AUSD.

Discussion: None.

Action Taken: City Council approved the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Alhambra Unified School District (AUSD) to continue the School Resource Officer (SRO) Program for Fiscal Year 2026-2027, contingent upon entry into a reimbursement agreement for the cost of such services with AUSD; authorized the Chief of Police to execute the Renewal to the Memorandum of Understanding; and directed staff to undertake the steps necessary to finalize Council’s action. (M2M26-80) Vote: Moved: ANDRADE-STADLER Seconded: LEE
Ayes: LEE, ANDRADE-STADLER, WANG, MAZA, MALONEY
Noes: NONE

Absent: NONE

17. AWARD OF CONTRACT: PROFESSIONAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND SUPPORT SERVICES FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT – F2M26-28, RFP2M26-2, C2M26-31, M2M26-81
On March 9, 2026, the City Council approved the distribution of a Request for Proposals (RFP) seeking proposals for Professional Information Technology and Support Services.

On April 15, 2026, the City received seven proposals. Four Police Department employees evaluated and ranked the proposals in accordance with the criteria stated in the RFP. The proposal received from SDI Presence, LLC (SDI) had the highest ranking and meets the City’s evaluation criteria including experience with similar projects involving municipalities, knowledge and hands-on experience with relevant government and public safety software 15 5-11-26
applications, qualifications and experience of proposed staff, hours and rates, and references.

Public Comment:
1) Gary Young, via Zoom, questioned if the contract would include any responsibilities with Flock Safety system. He suggested the City provide a transparency portal regarding ALP systems.
2) Yabi, via Zoom, questioned if the contract would interact with Flock Safety and expressed concerns regarding ALP systems, drone records, and government transparency.

Discussion: Chief of Police KENNEDY responded to public comment and provided clarification regarding the contract item. Mayor MALONEY and Chief KENNEDY discussed the transparency portal suggested by the public.

Action Taken: City Council awarded a contract to SDI Presence, LLC., subject to final language approval by the City Manager and City Attorney, to provide Professional Information Technology (IT) and Support Services to the Alhambra Police Department for a three-year term with two one-year optional extensions in an amount not to exceed $219,240 for the first year, with an annual CPI increase each year thereafter in a not to exceed amount of 5%; authorized the Chief of Police to execute the said agreement and the two one-year extensions, which shall be contingent on satisfactory performance and available budget; authorized the City Manager or her designee to amend the contract for other necessary IT related services outside the scope of the agreement if such amendment is within her authority; and, directed staff to undertake the steps necessary to finalize the Council’s action. (M2M26-81)
Vote: Moved: ANDRADE-STADLER Seconded: MAZA
Ayes: LEE, WANG, ANDRADE-STADLER, MAZA, MALONEY
Noes: NONE

Absent: NONE

18. PERSONNEL ACTIONS – F2M26-2
Discussion: None.

Action Taken: City Council ratified the actions of the City Manager set forth in that certain Personnel Actions document dated May 11, 2026 showing the various appointments, classifications, salary changes, etc., since the last City Council meeting.

Vote: Moved: ANDRADE-STADLER Seconded: LEE
Ayes: LEE, ANDRADE-STADLER, WANG, MAZA, MALONEY
Noes: NONE

Absent: NONE

19. DEMANDS – F2M26-1
Discussion: None.

Action Taken: City Council approved as submitted Final Check List (266247 thru 266359 and 1407 thru 1407) in the amount of $356,768.13 and EFTS in the amount of 16 5-11-26
$207,595.76 for the period ending April 23, 2026 and Schedule of Wire Transfers in the amount of $445,025.82 for the week ending April 17, 2026; Final Check List (266360 thru 266367 and 1408 thru 1585) in the amount of $65,573.92 for the period ending May 1, 2026; and, Final Check List (266368 thru 266529 and 1586 thru 1587) in the amount of $1,283,615.00 and EFTS in the amount of $191,456.60 for the period ending April 30, 2026 and Schedule of Wire Transfers in the amount of $4,950,386.86 for the week ending April 24, 2026.

Vote: Moved: ANDRADE-STADLER Seconded: LEE
Ayes: LEE, ANDRADE-STADLER, WANG, MAZA, MALONEY
Noes: NONE

Absent: NONE

20. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE ADDING SECTION 3.12.180 (TWO YEAR BUDGETS) AND AMENDING SECTIONS 2.24.020©, 2.28.020©, 2.32.030(A),

2.34.020(C), 9.12.030 AND 19.01.010(SEC. 102)(G) OF THE ALHAMBRA MUNICIPAL

CODE PERTAINING TO THE QUALIFICATIONS FOR MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING

COMMISSION, PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION, LIBRARY BOARD AND

TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AS WELL AS DAYTIME LOITERING AND THE SALE OF SAFE AND SANE FIREWORKS – F2M26-16, O2M26-4862
The Alhambra Municipal Code (“AMC”) is a comprehensive gathering of ordinances adopted by the City Council covering a wide range of topics. From time-to-time updates are made to the AMC to address new state legislation, clarify ambiguous provisions, or delete outdated language. While some of these changes require immediate consideration by the Council, most can be addressed periodically. For this annual review, City staff suggested minor changes to the AMC to reflect current practices and clarify confusing parts of the AMC. First, City staff identified the proposed addition of Section 3.12.180 (Two Year Budget) which would allow for the preparation of two-year budgets, which has been staff’s and the Council’s recent practice and preference to better stabilize the City’s finances. Staff also identified proposed amendments to Sections 2.24.020, 2.28.020,

2.32.030, 2.34.020 (Qualifications – Parks & Recreation Commission, Board of Library Trustees and Transportation Commission) which would further clarify the residency requirements for members of those Boards/Commissions. Furthermore, staff proposed amendments to Section 9.12.030 (Loitering; Daytime) which would change the truancy hours from 8:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. daily to instead refer to “school hours,” given the variation in school hours on a daily basis, and by school. A minor stopped for a potential violation would only be cited if the particular school they attend was in session at that time and the minor was not excused from attendance. Finally, staff proposed an amendment to Section 19.01.010 (Sale of Safe and Sane Fireworks) to address an inconsistency between the fee amount currently stated in the City’s adopted ordinance as it pertained to the sales of Safe and Sane fireworks and the City’s adopted Master Fee Schedule. To ensure accuracy and flexibility moving forward, the proposed ordinance would remove the specific fee amount and instead direct the public to the City’s current fee schedule, as adopted and periodically updated by resolution of the City Council.

Public Comment: Lewis McCammon discussed the added requirements to Boards and Commissions as well as the other changes to AMC.

Discussion: None.
17 5-11-26
Action Taken: City Council declared introduced for its first reading the following ordinance entitled:

Ordinance No. O2M26-4862: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Alhambra, California, adding Section 3.12.180 (Two Year Budgets) and amending Sections 2.24.020©, 2.28.020©, 2.32.030(A), 2.34.020(C), 9.12.030 and 19.01.010(Sec. 102)(G) of the Alhambra Municipal Code pertaining to the qualifications for members of the Planning Commission, Parks & Recreation Commission, Library Board and Transportation Commission as well as Daytime Loitering and the Sale of Safe and Sane Fireworks which ordinance would return for a second reading and adoption at the next regular Council meeting.

Vote: Moved: ANDRADE-STADLER Seconded: MAZA
Ayes: LEE, WANG, ANDRADE-STADLER, MAZA, MALONEY
Noes: NONE

Absent: NONE

21. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE ALHAMBRA CITY COUNCIL AMENDING SECTIONS 6.36.030, 20.23.030, 22.08.060, 22.20.090, 22.24.080, AND

22.52.020; CHAPTERS 5.38, 5.52, 5.90, 5.92, AND 22.12; AND ADDING CHAPTER

22.30 OF THE ALHAMBRA MUNICIPAL CODE – F2M26-16, O2M26-4864 Periodically amendments are needed to the Alhambra Municipal Code (“AMC”) based upon changes in legislation and issues arising in implementation of the AMC. This ordinance contains updates to the AMC related to Community Development that are not contained within the Alhambra Zoning Code (“Zoning Code”). A similar clean-up ordinance amending the Zoning Code is also being considered by the City Council at their meeting on May 11, 2026. The proposed ordinance, which shows the proposed AMC text changes in strikethrough and underline, is provided as an attachment to the May 11, 2026 staff report by the Director of Community Development. The City reviewed the environmental impacts of this Ordinance under the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq. “CEQA”) and the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 Cal. Code of Regs. §§ 15000, et seq., the “CEQA Guidelines”). This Ordinance is not subject to further review environmental review because: (1) it will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15060©(2); (2) there is no possibility that this Ordinance will have a significant effect on the environment (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15061(b)(3)); and (3) the Ordinance, by itself, does not constitute a “project” as defined in section 21065 of the Public Resources Code and the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15378). It can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that this Ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment.

Public Comment: Lewis MCCAMMON noted the additional requirements for the Planning Commission, Parks and Recreation Commission, and Environmental Sustainability Commission, specifically that members must be residents of the City of Alhambra.

Discussion: None
Action Taken: City Council directed the City Attorney to introduce and give first reading by title only, waiving further reading to the following ordinance entitled Ordinance 18 5-11-26
No. O2M26-4864: An Ordinance of the Alhambra City Council amending Sections

6.36.030, 20.23.030, 22.08.060, 22.20.090, 22.24.080, and 22.52.020, and Chapters

5.38, 5.52, 5.90, 5.92, and 22.12, and adding Chapter 22.30 to the Alhambra Municipal Code and finding such actions exempt from further environmental review under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060©(2), 15061(B)(3), and 15378
Vote: Moved: ANDRADE-STADLER Seconded: MAZA
Ayes: LEE, WANG, ANDRADE-STADLER, MAZA, MALONEY
Noes: NONE

Absent: NONE

22. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE ADDING CHAPTER 6.29 (“RESIDENTIAL TENANT PROTECTIONS”) TO TITLE VI (HEALTH AND

SANITATION) OF THE ALHAMBRA MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING AN

INCREASED RELOCATION ASSISTANCE OBLIGATION ON CERTAIN NO-FAULT RESIDENTIAL EVICTIONS IN THE CITY OF ALHAMBRA – F2M26-7, O2M26-4861 Staff is requesting that the City Council consider second reading and adoption of an ordinance adding Chapter 6.29 (Residential Tenant Protections) To Title VI (Health and Sanitation) of the Alhambra Municipal Code establishing an increased relocation assistance obligation on certain no-fault residential evictions in the City of Alhambra. On April 13, 2026, the City Council directed staff to prepare an ordinance to increase relocation assistance payments for no-fault evictions from one (1) month to three (3) months’ rent. The proposed ordinance would add Chapter 6.29 to the City’s Municipal Code, requiring that in those circumstances where relocation assistance is required under AB 1482, that the obligation would be increased from one to three months. To the extent that an owner/landlord does not comply with this requirement, the ordinance provides that such noncompliance can be asserted as a defense in any action brought by the owner to recover possession of a residential unit. Under AB 1482, landlords are required to provide relocation assistance for certain no-fault evictions, including owner move-in, substantial rehabilitation, demolition, or withdrawal of units from the rental market. The proposed ordinance was given first reading at the April 27, 2026 City Council meeting.

Public Comment:

The following people spoke against the proposed ordinance:
1) Adam Bray-Ali
2) Lorraine Clack
3) Charles Stapleton and Jose Ortiz
4) Joseph Ramos
5) Nanette Ong
6) Danny Sam
7) Mindy Ye, speaking on behalf of Becky Chan
The following people spoke in favor of the proposed ordinance:
8) Lewis McCammon
Discussion: Councilmember WANG and City Attorney MONTES discussed the ways the ordinance related to AB 1482. Mr. MONTES provided further clarification regarding the ordinance. Ms. WANG continued to address public concerns. She supported tenant relocation assistance, but stated that she would be open to additional 19 5-11-26
considerations to “mom and pop” landlords to mitigate the potential impacts on small property owners.

Councilmember MAZA expressed sympathy with the speakers as a property owner and realtor. He went on to discuss the recent case at 110 S. Chapel Ave and the need to support evicted people. He agreed with Ms. Wang’s suggestion to consider language to mitigate impact on small property owners. He suggested carving out 1-4 units, to include a section which would state that the 3 months relocation would apply in cases where the eviction is due to demolition or substantial remodel. He also requested staff return with more information regarding monitoring the ordinance.

Mayor MALONEY spoke to Council’s intent for the ordinance and spoke to the challenges to balance protecting tenants from landlords and protecting landlords with good intention.

Council continued to discuss SB 552 and guidelines for renovation as well as past cases where landlords have displaced tenants. Council discussed the need to prevent homelessness. Vice Mayor ANDRADE-STADLER supported the exception for 1-4 units and suggested more regulation for corporate owners.

Councilmember LEE and Mr. MONTES further discussed the exceptions provided in the proposed ordinance. Ms. LEE did not support further exception for 1-4 units and continued to support the ordinance as written. She stated that she could support exception for 1-2 units. Mr. MONTES provided further clarification as to the application of the ordinance.

Mr. MAZA motioned to move forward with the existing ordinance, with amendments for eviction related to demolition and to exclude 1-4 units from the ordinance. Ms. ANDRADESTADLER seconded the motion. Ms. LEE proposed a substitute motion for exceptions for single family homes and duplexes, which did not receive a second. Ms. Lee’s motion failed.

Council continued to discuss the ordinance and the proposed exemption for 1-4 units. Mr.

MONTES provided additional clarification and stated that due to the number of proposed changes, staff would have to bring the ordinance back revised for a first reading. Mr.

MALONEY clarified Council direction to amend the ordinance to create a new exemption for properties of 4 units or under, except in cases where the property is being demolition or substantial renovation then the 3 month assistance would apply. Mr. MONTES and Council discussed where in cases where the 3 months assistance would still apply under the ordinance. Mr. MAZA suggested Council review the ordinance after a year.

Action Taken: Council directed staff to return with revisions made to the ordinance for a first reading at the next City Council meeting.

PUBLIC COMMENT FOR NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS CONTINUED (TIME LIMITATION – 5

MINUTES PER SPEAKER)
Anthony Pham, via Zoom, discussed community concerns regarding Flock Safety and data privacy.

COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (ANNOUNCEMENTS & FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS) – F2M26-7 20 5-11-26
Vice Mayor ANDRADE-STADLER reported on community concerns regarding the preferred parking district on Hellman Ave. Ms. ANDRADE-STADLER requested Council consider an agendized discussion of the matter. She also requested Council send a letter of support for Moving Houses Altadena.

Council supported Ms. Andrade-Stadler’s request for an agendized discussion of the Preferred Parking Districts and the letter of support for Altadena. City Attorney MONTES provided clarification regarding Preferred Parking Districts and Council discussed the affected streets. City Manager BINNQUIST stated that staff would review the issue and bring back a report to Council for discussion.

Councilmember WANG reported on her attendance at the Annual Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Conference. She discussed the potential federal funding opportunity, the Surface Transportation Block Grant. She also reported discussion of affordable housing and the numerous organizations working with cities. Ms. WANG also discussed a meeting she attended for Los Angeles County Heat Action Policy.

Councilmember LEE referred to public commenters regarding parking issues and directed them to apply for traffic calming measures through the Public Works department. She went on to discuss the first 30 minutes for non-agendized Public Comment, and stated that she would prefer to be able to make comments after the speakers. She asked Council to support her request. City Attorney MONTES provided clarification. Mayor MALONEY expressed concerns with Council having longer conversations with the public for non-agendized items due to the constraints of the Brown Act. Ms. LEE and Ms. WANG discussed the suggestion and the best way to respond and foster communication. Ms. WANG suggested an agendized Council Communication portion after the 30-minute Public Comment for Non-Agendized Items. Councilmember MAZA supported the suggestion. Mr. MALONEY and Mr. MONTES continued to express concerns regarding the Brown Act. Mr. MALONEY suggested that the Mayor could exercise discretion in directing staff to followup with the speakers.

Mayor MALONEY announced upcoming City events, including Memorial Day Ceremony, and Summer Leisure Class open registration. He also reported on a recent meeting with staff and CalTrans and reminded the public of an upcoming Town Hall Meeting regarding the 710 Project.

He also noted that due to Memorial Day, there would not be a regular City Council Meeting on Monday, May 25, 2026. He also reported that the “ICE Free” signs were available at Alhambra City Hall. He further supported Ms. Andrade-Stadler’s suggestion of a letter supporting home relocation in Altadena.

ADJOURNMENT: At 11:26 p.m. there being no further business for the Council to transact, the Mayor, with the consent of the City Council, adjourned to the next regular meeting of the Alhambra City Council scheduled for Monday, June 22, 2026 at 6:00 p.m.

BRIANNA LAMB MCCARTHY

ASSISTANT CITY CLERK

← All documents from this meeting