Aliso Viejo City Council
December 14, 2022

1 AGENDA (Revised)

ALISO VIEJO CITY COUNCIL
WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 14, 2022
7:00 PM ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING

City Hall
Council Chambers
12 Journey
Aliso Viejo, CA

Mayor Ross Chun
Mayor Pro Tem Richard W. Hurt
Councilmember Tiffany Ackley
Councilmember David C. Harrington
Councilmember Mike Munzing

WELCOME to the City of Aliso Viejo City Council meeting. Those persons wishing to address the City Council are requested to complete and submit to the City Clerk a “Request to Address City Counc il” form available at the entrance to the City Council Chambers. Speakers will be called at the appropriate time as their interested matter is heard. COMMENTS WILL BE LIMITED TO THREE MINUTES PER SPEAKER. Council proceedings are recorded.

It is the City’s intention to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If you need special assistance to participate in the meeting, the City will make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility and/or accommodations. [28 CFR 35.102- 35.104 ADA Title II] Please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (949) 425- 2505 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting.

Regular meetings of the City Council are held on the first and third Wednesday of the month at the City Hall Council Chambers, 12 Journey, Aliso Viejo. Copies of the agenda are available in the lobby at City Hall on the Thursday preceding a regularly sched uled City Council meeting. All communications received by the City regarding an agenda item have been included in the agenda materials. Supplemental documents relating to specific agenda items, including communications received after agenda delivery, are presented at the dais and in the Public Copy agenda binder at the time of the meeting. Supplemental documents are also available for review in the City Clerk’s office, 12 Journey, Aliso Viejo. For more information, please contact City Hall at (949) 425- 2505.

This meeting will be broadcast live on Cox Communications Channel 851, AT&T U -Verse Channel 99 and the City's website. By attending the City Council Meeting, you are giving your permission to be televised. The Council Meetings are rebroadcast on Wednesday at 7:00 p.m. on Cox Communications Channel 851, AT&T U - Verse Channel 99, and can be viewed on the internet at www.avcity.org.

DAVID A. DOYLE SCOTT C. SMITH MITZI ORTIZ

CITY MANAGER CITY ATTORNEY CITY CLERK
1 2

PLEASE SILENCE ALL CELL PHONES AND OTHER

ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT WHILE CITY COUNCIL IS IN SESSION

CALL TO ORDER: CONVENE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING

ROLL CALL

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:

1. POST ELECTION MATTERS:

1.1. CERTIFICATION OF OFFICIAL ELECTIONS RESULTS
Recommended Action: Adopt a Resolution reciting the facts of the General Municipal Election held on November 8, 2022, declaring the result and such other matters as provided by law.

Staff Report
Attachment 1 - Resolution
Attachment 2 - Ordinance

1.2. RECOGNITION OF OUTGOING COUNCILMEMBER DAVID C. HARRINGTON

RECESS AND RECONVENE

1.3. OATH OF OFFICE CEREMONY AND INSTALLATION OF COUNCILMEMBER

TIFFANY ACKLEY

1.4. OATH OF OFFICE CEREMONY AND INSTALLATION OF COUNCILMEMBER MAX DUNCAN

2. ADDITIONS, DELETIONS, REORDERING TO THE AGENDA:

3. COMMUNITY INPUT:

Members of the public wishing to address the City Council are requested to complete and submit to the City Clerk a “Request to Address City Council” form available at the entrance to the City Council Chambers. In compliance with the Brown Act, no discussion or action may be taken on comments received at this time, except the City Council may briefly respond to statements made or questions posed. Comments are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker.

2 3

4. CONSENT CALENDAR:

All matters listed on the Consent Calendar will be acted upon by one vote unless members of the City Council, or staff request a matter to be discussed and/or removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. Items removed from the Consent Calendar will be discussed and voted upon immediately following City Council action on the remainder of the Consent Calendar.

4.1. WAIVE THE READING OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Recommended Action: Approve the reading by title only of all ordinances and resolutions wherein the titles appear on the public agenda; said titles shall be determined to have been read by title, and further reading is waived.

4.2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Recommended Action: Approve the Minutes as submitted for the November 16, 2022 Regular Meeting.

Draft Minutes - November 16, 2022 Regular Meeting

4.3. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCES REGARDING A SPECIFIC

PLAN AMENDMENT AND A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE COMMONS

SPECIFIC PLAN
Recommended Action:

1. Find that the Project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (Infill Development);

2. Give second reading and adopt an Ordinance (Attachment 1) entitled: AN

ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALISO VIEJO, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2 FOR THE COMMONS AT ALISO

VIEJO TOWN CENTER AND DETERMINE THE PROJECT TO BE
CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM CEQA UNDER CLASS 32 (PLANNING APPLICATION SP-22-00001); and

3. Give second reading and adopt Ordinance (Attachment 2) entitled: AN ORDINANCE

OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF T HE CITY OF ALISO VIEJO, CALIFORNIA,

APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ALISO VIEJO AND VALUEROCK ALISO VIEJO, LLC FOR SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2 (THE

COMMONS AT ALISO VIEJO TOWN CENTER) PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65864 ET SE Q. AND DETERMINE THE PROJECT TO BE CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM CEQA UNDER CLASS 32 (PLANNING APPLICATION DA-22-00001).

Staff Report
Attachment 1 - Specific Plan Amendment Ordinance
Attachment 2 - Development Agreement Ordinance

4.4. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
Recommended Action:

1. Ratify accounts payable checks and electronic funds transfers issued October 27, 2022, in the amount of $725,675.47;

2. Ratify accounts payable checks and electronic funds transfers issued November 10, 2022, in the amount of $1,238,790.98; and
3 4

3. Ratify accounts payable checks and electronic funds transfers issued November 22, 2022, in the amount of $743,562.60.

Staff Report
Attachment 1 - Accounts Payable Report

4.5. MEASURE M2 EXPENDITURE REPORT
Recommended Action: Adopt a Resolution approving the City’s annual Measure M2 expenditure report for fiscal year ending June 30, 2022.

Staff Report
Attachment 1 - Resolution
Attachment 2 - Measure M2 Expenditure Report

4.6 RESOLUTION EXTENSION AUTHORIZING VIRTUAL CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS PURSUANT TO ASSEMBLY BILL 361
Recommended Action: Move to reconfirm findings under Assembly Bill 361 and extend Resolution No. 2021-27 to continue virtual City Council meetings.

Staff Report
Attachment 1 - Resolution No. 2021-27

5. PUBLIC HEARINGS:

None.

6. DISCUSSION:

6.1. CITY COUNCIL REORGANIZATION
Recommended Action: Select a Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem in accordance with Ordinance No. 2001-022, for the 2023 calendar year.

Staff Report

6.2. CITY COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS TO SERVE ON REGIONAL BOARDS,

COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES
Recommended Action:

1. Review and update Council appointment list to regional boards, commissions, and committees; and

2. If needed, adopt a Resolution designating and appointing the City’s representative to the Orange County Fire Authority Board of Directors.

Staff Report
Attachment 1 - 2022 Appointment List
Attachment 2 - Resolution

7. CITY MANAGER' S REPORT:

4 5

8. ANNOUNCEMENTS / COUNCIL COMMENTS / COMMITTEE UPDATES:

9. ADJOURNMENT:

The next regularly scheduled City Council meeting is December 21, 2022.

5 City of Aliso Viejo

AGENDA ITEM
DATE: December 14, 2022
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Mitzi Ortiz, Director of Government Services
SUBJECT: CERTIFICATION OF OFFICIAL ELECTIONS RESULTS
Recommended Action:

Adopt a Resolution reciting the facts of the General Municipal Election held on November 8, 2022, declaring the result and such other matters as provided by law.

Fiscal Impact:

Funding for the 2022 General Municipal Election in the amount of $85,000 was included in the FY 2022-23 Budget. The final invoice has not been received from the Orange County Registrar of Voters as of this time.

Background:

On June 1, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2022-10 calling the General Municipal Election on November 8, 2022, for the election of two members of the City Council. The City Council also adopted Resolution No. 2022-11 requesting that the County of Orange consolidate the election with the Statewide General Election held on the same day. The election was held with five nominees on the ballot: Tiffany Ackley, Payal Avellan, Max Duncan, Arthur Osorio, and Tara Ricksen.

The City Council had previously adopted Resolution No. 2021-32 approving the inclusion of the following ballot measure on the November 8, 2022 ballot:

Shall an ordinance be adopted by the City of Aliso Viejo to limit consecutive years of service by members of the City Council to a combined total of two four-year terms with the ability to again serve as a member after a lapse of service of at least two years? YES
NO
Resolution No. 2020-11 also authorized the Orange County Registrar of Voters (ROV) to canvass the returns of the General Municipal Election on behalf of the City. The California Elections Code requires completion of the canvass to occur no later than the 30th day after the election, or December 8, 2022. As the regularly scheduled City Council meeting 6

would have been held on December 7th, one day prior to the canvass completion deadline, it was prudent to postpone the December 7th meeting to December 14, 2022.

Discussion:

California Elections Code Section 10262(b) provides that in consolidated elections, upon receipt of the results following the canvass of the returns, the City elections official shall certify the results to the governing body no later than the next regularly scheduled City Council meeting or at a special meeting called for this purpose.

The Orange County Registrar of Voters has provided the results of the canvass of the election to the City elections official. The vote counts for the City Council candidates are as follows, with the top two candidates being elected to office:

Tiffany Ackley 7,721 (27.84%)
Max Duncan 7,132 (25.71%)
Tara Ricksen 5,758 (20.76%)
Payal Avellan 5,252 (18.93%)
Arthur Osorio 1,875 (6.76%)
The vote counts for the ballot measure are as follows, with the ballot measure passing:

Yes 14,597 (84.86%)
No 2,604 (15.14%)
California Elections Code Section 10263 requires the City Council adopt a resolution reciting the fact of the election and declaring elected the persons for whom the highest number of votes were cast for each office prior to the installation of new officers.

Furthermore, pursuant to California Elections Code Section 9217, with the passing of the ballot measure, the related ordinance shall take effect ten days following adoption of said resolution.

Attachment:

1. Resolution

2. Ordinance
7

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALISO

VIEJO, CALIFORNIA, RECITING THE FACT OF THE GENERAL
MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD ON NOVEMBER 8, 2022 D ECLARING

THE RESULT AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS PROVIDED BY LAW

WHEREAS, a Gener al Municipal Election was held and conducted in the City of Aliso Viejo, California, on Tuesday, November 8, 2022, as required by law; and

WHEREAS, notice of the election was given in time, form and manner as provided by law; that voting centers were properly established; that election officers were appointed and that in all respects the election was held and conducted and the votes were cast, received and canvassed and the returns made and declared in time, form and manner as required by the provisions of the laws of the State of California relating to general law cities; and

WHEREAS, the Orange County Registrar of Voters canvassed the returns of the election and has certified the results to this City Council, the results are received, attached and made a part hereof as “Exhibit A.”

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALISO VIEJO,

CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. That the whole number of ballots cast in the vote ce nters was 3,236, and the whole number of vote-by-mail ballots cast in the City was 15,219, making a total of 18,455 ballots cast in the City.

SECTION 2. That the names of persons voted for at the election for Member of the City Council are as follows:

Tiffany Ackley
Payal Avellan
Max Duncan
Arthur Osorio
Tara Ricksen

That the measure voted upon at the election is as follows:

Shall an ordinance be adopted by the City of Aliso Viejo to limit consecutive years of service by members of the City Council to a combined total of two four -year
terms with the ability to again
serve as a member after a lapse of service of at least two years? YES
NO

8

SECTION 3. That the number of votes given at vote centers and the number of votes given in the City to each of the persons above named for the respective offices for which the persons were candidates and for and against the measure were as listed in “Exhibit A” attached.

SECTION 4. The City Council does declare and determine that Tiffa ny Ackley was elected as Member of the City Council for the full term of four years; and Max Duncan was elected as Member of the City Council for the full term of four years. That as a result of the election, a majority of the voters voting on the measure relating to City Council Member term limits did vote in favor of it, and that the measure was carried, and shall be deemed adopted and ratified.

SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall enter on the recor ds of the City Council of the City, a statement of the re sult of the election, showing: (1) the whole number of ballots cast in the City; (2) the names of the persons voted for; (3) the measure voted upon; (4) for what office each person was voted for; ( 5) the number of votes given at vote cente rs to each person, and for and agains t t he measure; and ( 6) t he total number of votes given to each person, and for and against the measure.

SECTION 6. That the City Clerk shall immediately make and deliver to each of the persons so elected a Certificate of Election signed by the City Clerk and authenticated; that the City Clerk sh all also administer to each person elected the Oath of Office prescribed in the Constitution of the State of California and shall have them subscribe to it and file it in the office of the City Clerk. Each and all of the persons so elected shall then be i nducted into the respective office to which they have been elected.

SECTION 7. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of December, 2022.

__________________________
Ross Chun
Mayor

APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:

__________________________ __________________________
Scott C. Smith, City Attorney Mitzi Ortiz, MMC, City Clerk 9

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.

CITY OF ALISO VIEJO )

I, MITZI ORTIZ, City Clerk of the City of Aliso Viejo, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 20 22-__ duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Aliso Viejo at their regular meeting held on the 14th day of December, 2022, by the following roll call vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

___________________________

MITZI ORTIZ, MMC

CITY CLERK

(SEAL)

10 11
12 Vote Center Totals
District
Registration
Ballots Cast
Turnout (%)

MAX DUNCAN

PAYAL AVELLAN

TIFFANY ACKLEY

TARA RICKSEN

ARTHUR OSORIO
Orange County 32,133 3,236 10.1 1,724 512 819 1,409 285 Orange County 32,133 3,236 10.1 1,724 512 819 1,409 285 40th Congressional District 32,133 3,236 10.1 1,724 512 819 1,409 285 37th Senate District 32,133 3,236 10.1 1,724 512 819 1,409 285 72nd Assembly District 32,133 3,236 10.1 1,724 512 819 1,409 285 5th Supervisorial District 32,133 3,236 10.1 1,724 512 819 1,409 285 Aliso Viejo 32,133 3,236 10.1 1,724 512 819 1,409 285
State Board of Equalization
(4th District)
32,133 3,236 10.1 1,724 512 819 1,409 285
County Board of Education
Trustee Area 5
32,133 3,236 10.1 1,724 512 819 1,409 285
South Orange County
Community College District
32,133 3,236 10.1 1,724 512 819 1,409 285
South Orange County
Community College District
Trustee Area 3
22,962 2,375 10.3 1,272 372 603 1,029 198
South Orange County
Community College District
Trustee Area 6
9,171 861 9.4 452 140 216 380 87
Capistrano Unified School
District
29,728 3,037 10.2 1,631 474 768 1,328 264
Capistrano Unified School
District Trustee Area 5
29,728 3,037 10.2 1,631 474 768 1,328 264
Laguna Beach Unified School
District
1,435 138 9.6 77 22 33 64 8
Saddleback Valley Unified
School District
970 61 6.3 16 16 18 17 13
Saddleback Valley Unif Sch Dist
Trustee Area 1
785 57 7.3 16 14 16 16 11
Saddleback Valley Unif Sch Dist
Trustee Area 2
185 4 2.2 0 2 2 1 2
Municipal Water District Of
Orange County
32,133 3,236 10.1 1,724 512 819 1,409 285
Municipal Water District of
Orange County Div 5
32,133 3,236 10.1 1,724 512 819 1,409 285
Moulton-Niguel Water District 31,163 3,175 10.2 1,708 496 801 1,392 272 El Toro Water District 970 61 6.3 16 16 18 17 13
Capistrano Unified School
District - SFID 3
29,728 3,037 10.2 1,631 474 768 1,328 264
Historical 2010 - 48th
Congressional District
32,133 3,236 10.1 1,724 512 819 1,409 285
Historical 2010 - 36th Senate
District
32,133 3,236 10.1 1,724 512 819 1,409 285
Historical 2010 - 73rd
Assembly District
32,133 3,236 10.1 1,724 512 819 1,409 285
Historical 2010 - State Board of
Equalization (4th District)
32,133 3,236 10.1 1,724 512 819 1,409 285
Historical 2010 - 5th
Supervisorial District
32,133 3,236 10.1 1,724 512 819 1,409 285
Historical 2010 - County Board
of Education Trustee Area 5
32,133 3,236 10.1 1,724 512 819 1,409 285
Vote Center Totals 32,133 3,236 10.1 1,724 512 819 1,409 285 12/02/2022 3:07 PM Page 2767District Results Report - November 08, 2022 CITY OF ALISO VIEJO Member, City Council
13 Vote by Mail
Totals
District
Registration
Ballots Cast
Turnout (%)

MAX DUNCAN

PAYAL AVELLAN

TIFFANY ACKLEY

TARA RICKSEN

ARTHUR OSORIO
Orange County 32,133 15,219 47.4 5408 4740 6902 4349 1590 Orange County 32,133 15,219 47.4 5408 4740 6902 4349 1590 40th Congressional District 32,133 15,219 47.4 5408 4740 6902 4349 1590 37th Senate District 32,133 15,219 47.4 5408 4740 6902 4349 1590 72nd Assembly District 32,133 15,219 47.4 5408 4740 6902 4349 1590 5th Supervisorial District 32,133 15,219 47.4 5408 4740 6902 4349 1590 Aliso Viejo 32,133 15,219 47.4 5408 4740 6902 4349 1590 State Board of Equalization
(4th District)
32,133 15,219 47.4 5408 4740 6902 4349 1590
County Board of Education
Trustee Area 5
32,133 15,219 47.4 5408 4740 6902 4349 1590
South Orange County
Community College District
32,133 15,219 47.4 5408 4740 6902 4349 1590
South Orange County
Community College District
Trustee Area 3
22,962 10,636 46.3 3869 3296 4821 3071 1097
South Orange County
Community College District
Trustee Area 6
9,171 4,583 50.0 1539 1444 2081 1278 493
Capistrano Unified School
District
29,728 14,160 47.6 5115 4401 6445 4080 1445
Capistrano Unified School
District Trustee Area 5
29,728 14,160 47.6 5115 4401 6445 4080 1445
Laguna Beach Unified School
District
1,435 710 49.5 215 241 312 187 81
Saddleback Valley Unified
School District
970 349 36.0 78 98 145 82 64
Saddleback Valley Unif Sch Dist
Trustee Area 1
785 227 28.9 41 85 106 53 56
Saddleback Valley Unif Sch Dist
Trustee Area 2
185 122 65.9 37 13 39 29 8
Municipal Water District Of
Orange County
32,133 15,219 47.4 5408 4740 6902 4349 1590
Municipal Water District of
Orange County Div 5
32,133 15,219 47.4 5408 4740 6902 4349 1590
Moulton-Niguel Water District 31,163 14,870 47.7 5330 4642 6757 4267 1526 El Toro Water District 970 349 36.0 78 98 145 82 64
Capistrano Unified School
District - SFID 3
29,728 14,160 47.6 5115 4401 6445 4080 1445
Historical 2010 - 48th
Congressional District
32,133 15,219 47.4 5408 4740 6902 4349 1590
Historical 2010 - 36th Senate
District
32,133 15,219 47.4 5408 4740 6902 4349 1590
Historical 2010 - 73rd
Assembly District
32,133 15,219 47.4 5408 4740 6902 4349 1590
Historical 2010 - State Board of
Equalization (4th District)
32,133 15,219 47.4 5408 4740 6902 4349 1590
Historical 2010 - 5th
Supervisorial District
32,133 15,219 47.4 5408 4740 6902 4349 1590
Historical 2010 - County Board
of Education Trustee Area 5
32,133 15,219 47.4 5408 4740 6902 4349 1590
Vote by Mail Totals 32,133 15,219 47.4 5,408 4,740 6,902 4,349 1,590 12/02/2022 3:07 PM Page 2768District Results Report - November 08, 2022 CITY OF ALISO VIEJO Member, City Council
14 Grand Totals
District
Registration
Ballots Cast
Turnout (%)

MAX DUNCAN

PAYAL AVELLAN

TIFFANY ACKLEY

TARA RICKSEN

ARTHUR OSORIO
Orange County 32,133 18,455 57.4 7132 5252 7721 5758 1875 Orange County 32,133 18,455 57.4 7132 5252 7721 5758 1875 40th Congressional District 32,133 18,455 57.4 7132 5252 7721 5758 1875 37th Senate District 32,133 18,455 57.4 7132 5252 7721 5758 1875 72nd Assembly District 32,133 18,455 57.4 7132 5252 7721 5758 1875 5th Supervisorial District 32,133 18,455 57.4 7132 5252 7721 5758 1875 Aliso Viejo 32,133 18,455 57.4 7132 5252 7721 5758 1875 State Board of Equalization
(4th District)
32,133 18,455 57.4 7132 5252 7721 5758 1875
County Board of Education
Trustee Area 5
32,133 18,455 57.4 7132 5252 7721 5758 1875
South Orange County
Community College District
32,133 18,455 57.4 7132 5252 7721 5758 1875
South Orange County
Community College District
Trustee Area 3
22,962 13,011 56.7 5141 3668 5424 4100 1295
South Orange County
Community College District
Trustee Area 6
9,171 5,444 59.4 1991 1584 2297 1658 580
Capistrano Unified School
District
29,728 17,197 57.8 6746 4875 7213 5408 1709
Capistrano Unified School
District Trustee Area 5
29,728 17,197 57.8 6746 4875 7213 5408 1709
Laguna Beach Unified School
District
1,435 848 59.1 292 263 345 251 89
Saddleback Valley Unified
School District
970 410 42.3 94 114 163 99 77
Saddleback Valley Unif Sch Dist
Trustee Area 1
785 284 36.2 57 99 122 69 67
Saddleback Valley Unif Sch Dist
Trustee Area 2
185 126 68.1 37 15 41 30 10
Municipal Water District Of
Orange County
32,133 18,455 57.4 7132 5252 7721 5758 1875
Municipal Water District of
Orange County Div 5
32,133 18,455 57.4 7132 5252 7721 5758 1875
Moulton-Niguel Water District 31,163 18,045 57.9 7038 5138 7558 5659 1798 El Toro Water District 970 410 42.3 94 114 163 99 77
Capistrano Unified School
District - SFID 3
29,728 17,197 57.8 6746 4875 7213 5408 1709
Historical 2010 - 48th
Congressional District
32,133 18,455 57.4 7132 5252 7721 5758 1875
Historical 2010 - 36th Senate
District
32,133 18,455 57.4 7132 5252 7721 5758 1875
Historical 2010 - 73rd
Assembly District
32,133 18,455 57.4 7132 5252 7721 5758 1875
Historical 2010 - State Board of
Equalization (4th District)
32,133 18,455 57.4 7132 5252 7721 5758 1875
Historical 2010 - 5th
Supervisorial District
32,133 18,455 57.4 7132 5252 7721 5758 1875
Historical 2010 - County Board
of Education Trustee Area 5
32,133 18,455 57.4 7132 5252 7721 5758 1875
Vote Center Totals 32,133 3,236 10.1 1,724 512 819 1,409 285 Vote by Mail Totals 32,133 15,219 47.4 5,408 4,740 6,902 4,349 1,590 Grand Totals 32,133 18,455 57.4 7,132 5,252 7,721 5,758 1,875 12/02/2022 3:07 PM Page 2769District Results Report - November 08, 2022 CITY OF ALISO VIEJO Member, City Council
15 Vote Center Totals
District
Registration
Ballots Cast
Turnout (%)
Yes
No
Orange County 32,133 3,236 10.1 2,436 611
Orange County 32,133 3,236 10.1 2,436 611
40th Congressional District 32,133 3,236 10.1 2,436 611 37th Senate District 32,133 3,236 10.1 2,436 611
72nd Assembly District 32,133 3,236 10.1 2,436 611
5th Supervisorial District 32,133 3,236 10.1 2,436 611
Aliso Viejo 32,133 3,236 10.1 2,436 611
State Board of Equalization
(4th District)
32,133 3,236 10.1 2,436 611
County Board of Education
Trustee Area 5
32,133 3,236 10.1 2,436 611
South Orange County
Community College District
32,133 3,236 10.1 2,436 611
South Orange County
Community College District
Trustee Area 3
22,962 2,375 10.3 1,793 441
South Orange County
Community College District
Trustee Area 6
9,171 861 9.4 643 170
Capistrano Unified School
District
29,728 3,037 10.2 2,282 575
Capistrano Unified School
District Trustee Area 5
29,728 3,037 10.2 2,282 575
Laguna Beach Unified School
District
1,435 138 9.6 107 24
Saddleback Valley Unified
School District
970 61 6.3 47 12
Saddleback Valley Unif Sch Dist
Trustee Area 1
785 57 7.3 44 11
Saddleback Valley Unif Sch Dist
Trustee Area 2
185 4 2.2 3 1
Municipal Water District Of
Orange County
32,133 3,236 10.1 2,436 611
Municipal Water District of
Orange County Div 5
32,133 3,236 10.1 2,436 611
Moulton-Niguel Water District 31,163 3,175 10.2 2,389 599 El Toro Water District 970 61 6.3 47 12
Capistrano Unified School
District - SFID 3
29,728 3,037 10.2 2,282 575
Historical 2010 - 48th
Congressional District
32,133 3,236 10.1 2,436 611
Historical 2010 - 36th Senate
District
32,133 3,236 10.1 2,436 611
Historical 2010 - 73rd
Assembly District
32,133 3,236 10.1 2,436 611
Historical 2010 - State Board of
Equalization (4th District)
32,133 3,236 10.1 2,436 611
Historical 2010 - 5th
Supervisorial District
32,133 3,236 10.1 2,436 611
Historical 2010 - County Board
of Education Trustee Area 5
32,133 3,236 10.1 2,436 611
Vote Center Totals 32,133 3,236 10.1 2,436 611
12/02/2022 3:07 PM Page 3854District Results Report - November 08, 2022 I-City of Aliso Viejo
16 Vote by Mail
Totals
District
Registration
Ballots Cast
Turnout (%)
Yes
No
Orange County 32,133 15,219 47.4 12161 1993
Orange County 32,133 15,219 47.4 12161 1993
40th Congressional District 32,133 15,219 47.4 12161 1993 37th Senate District 32,133 15,219 47.4 12161 1993
72nd Assembly District 32,133 15,219 47.4 12161 1993
5th Supervisorial District 32,133 15,219 47.4 12161 1993 Aliso Viejo 32,133 15,219 47.4 12161 1993
State Board of Equalization
(4th District)
32,133 15,219 47.4 12161 1993
County Board of Education
Trustee Area 5
32,133 15,219 47.4 12161 1993
South Orange County
Community College District
32,133 15,219 47.4 12161 1993
South Orange County
Community College District
Trustee Area 3
22,962 10,636 46.3 8482 1404
South Orange County
Community College District
Trustee Area 6
9,171 4,583 50.0 3679 589
Capistrano Unified School
District
29,728 14,160 47.6 11367 1836
Capistrano Unified School
District Trustee Area 5
29,728 14,160 47.6 11367 1836
Laguna Beach Unified School
District
1,435 710 49.5 546 98
Saddleback Valley Unified
School District
970 349 36.0 248 59
Saddleback Valley Unif Sch Dist
Trustee Area 1
785 227 28.9 167 46
Saddleback Valley Unif Sch Dist
Trustee Area 2
185 122 65.9 81 13
Municipal Water District Of
Orange County
32,133 15,219 47.4 12161 1993
Municipal Water District of
Orange County Div 5
32,133 15,219 47.4 12161 1993
Moulton-Niguel Water District 31,163 14,870 47.7 11913 1934 El Toro Water District 970 349 36.0 248 59
Capistrano Unified School
District - SFID 3
29,728 14,160 47.6 11367 1836
Historical 2010 - 48th
Congressional District
32,133 15,219 47.4 12161 1993
Historical 2010 - 36th Senate
District
32,133 15,219 47.4 12161 1993
Historical 2010 - 73rd
Assembly District
32,133 15,219 47.4 12161 1993
Historical 2010 - State Board of
Equalization (4th District)
32,133 15,219 47.4 12161 1993
Historical 2010 - 5th
Supervisorial District
32,133 15,219 47.4 12161 1993
Historical 2010 - County Board
of Education Trustee Area 5
32,133 15,219 47.4 12161 1993
Vote by Mail Totals 32,133 15,219 47.4 12,161 1,993
12/02/2022 3:07 PM Page 3855District Results Report - November 08, 2022 I-City of Aliso Viejo
17 Grand Totals
District
Registration
Ballots Cast
Turnout (%)
Yes
No
Orange County 32,133 18,455 57.4 14597 2604
Orange County 32,133 18,455 57.4 14597 2604
40th Congressional District 32,133 18,455 57.4 14597 2604 37th Senate District 32,133 18,455 57.4 14597 2604
72nd Assembly District 32,133 18,455 57.4 14597 2604
5th Supervisorial District 32,133 18,455 57.4 14597 2604 Aliso Viejo 32,133 18,455 57.4 14597 2604
State Board of Equalization
(4th District)
32,133 18,455 57.4 14597 2604
County Board of Education
Trustee Area 5
32,133 18,455 57.4 14597 2604
South Orange County
Community College District
32,133 18,455 57.4 14597 2604
South Orange County
Community College District
Trustee Area 3
22,962 13,011 56.7 10275 1845
South Orange County
Community College District
Trustee Area 6
9,171 5,444 59.4 4322 759
Capistrano Unified School
District
29,728 17,197 57.8 13649 2411
Capistrano Unified School
District Trustee Area 5
29,728 17,197 57.8 13649 2411
Laguna Beach Unified School
District
1,435 848 59.1 653 122
Saddleback Valley Unified
School District
970 410 42.3 295 71
Saddleback Valley Unif Sch Dist
Trustee Area 1
785 284 36.2 211 57
Saddleback Valley Unif Sch Dist
Trustee Area 2
185 126 68.1 84 14
Municipal Water District Of
Orange County
32,133 18,455 57.4 14597 2604
Municipal Water District of
Orange County Div 5
32,133 18,455 57.4 14597 2604
Moulton-Niguel Water District 31,163 18,045 57.9 14302 2533 El Toro Water District 970 410 42.3 295 71
Capistrano Unified School
District - SFID 3
29,728 17,197 57.8 13649 2411
Historical 2010 - 48th
Congressional District
32,133 18,455 57.4 14597 2604
Historical 2010 - 36th Senate
District
32,133 18,455 57.4 14597 2604
Historical 2010 - 73rd
Assembly District
32,133 18,455 57.4 14597 2604
Historical 2010 - State Board of
Equalization (4th District)
32,133 18,455 57.4 14597 2604
Historical 2010 - 5th
Supervisorial District
32,133 18,455 57.4 14597 2604
Historical 2010 - County Board
of Education Trustee Area 5
32,133 18,455 57.4 14597 2604
Vote Center Totals 32,133 3,236 10.1 2,436 611
Vote by Mail Totals 32,133 15,219 47.4 12,161 1,993
Grand Totals 32,133 18,455 57.4 14,597 2,604
12/02/2022 3:07 PM Page 3856District Results Report - November 08, 2022 I-City of Aliso Viejo
18

ORDINANCE NO. ______

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ALISO VIEJO, CALIFORNIA,

AMENDING THE ALISO VIEJO MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD SECTION

2.04.125 REGARDING COUNCILMEMBER TERM LIMITS, SUBJECT TO

THE APPROVAL OF THE ELECTORS VOTING ON THE MEASURE IN
THE GENERAL ELECTION HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 2022.

NOW THEREFORE, THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF ALISO VIEJO DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Term Limits
Pursuant to Government Code section 36502, subdivision (b) and subject to the approval of a majority of the voters of the City of Aliso Viejo, the Aliso Viejo Municipal Code is hereby amended to add section 2.04.125, Term Limits, to chapter 2.04, City Council, of title 2, Administration and Personnel to read as follows:

2.04.125 Term Limits
A. No person shall be eligible to serve as a member of the City Council for more than two consecutive four-year terms following the adoption of this ordinance commencing with the, and including those persons elected to serve as a member of the City Council in the November 8, 2022 election. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any person who is appointed by the City Council or elected to fill a vacant office of a member of the City Council for the balance of a four-year term, but serves less than two years in that office, shall be eligible for nomination and election for two consecutive four-year terms thereafter.

B. Any person who shall be ineligible for election, appointment, or further services as a member of the City Council due to the limitation set forth in subsection A of this section, shall again be eligible for election or appointment as a member of the City Council, and a new period of consecutive years of service shall commence, provided that at least two years has or will have elapsed between the most recent date of such person’s prior service as a member of the City Council and the effective date of such person’s most recent election or appointment to such office.

C. The phrase “two years” as used in subsection B of this section shall mean the period between the date of the declaration of the results of any general municipal election held in November of an even numbered year and the date of the declaration of the results of any general municipal election held in November of any immediately preceding or immediately succeeding even- numbered year, even though such period may be more or less than an actual period of two years.
19

Section 2. Voter Approval, Prospective Application, and Effective Date Except as provided in section 3 below, this ordinance shall take effect if approved by a majority of the eligible voters of the City of Aliso Viejo voting in the general election held on Tuesday, November 8, 2022, and shall only apply prospectively beginning with the terms of members of the City Council that start after the November 8 election. If so approved, this ordinance becomes effective 10 days after the City Council declares and certifies the results of the election by resolution.

Section 3. Severability
If any provision of this ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of the ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this ordinance are severable. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance irrespective of the invalidity of any particular portion thereof.

Section 4. Publication
The City Clerk is hereby directed to publish this ordinance at least once, within 15 days after the election results are certified, in a newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Aliso Viejo.

I certify that Ordinance No. _____ was adopted by the electorate of the City of Aliso Viejo at the general election held on November 8, 2022. This ordinance was adopted as a result of the passage of Measure ___. Please refer to Resolution No. _______ for the recitation of the election results.

Mitzi Ortiz, MMC
City Clerk
20

Regular Meeting Minutes

CITY OF ALISO VIEJO

CITY COUNCIL MINUTES

REGULAR MEETING
NOVEMBER 16, 2022, 7:00 P.M.

Council Chambers, City Hall, 12 Journey
Aliso Viejo, California
City Council conducted this meeting in accordance with California Government Code Section 54953(e)(2) and COVID-19 pandemic protocols.

CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Chun called the Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Aliso Viejo to order at 7:05 p.m.

ROLL CALL:

PRESENT: MAYOR ROSS CHUN (via teleconference)
MAYOR PRO TEM RICHARD HURT (via teleconference)
COUNCILMEMBER TIFFANY ACKLEY (via teleconference)
COUNCILMEMBER DAVID C. HARRINGTON (via teleconference)
COUNCILMEMBER MIKE MUNZING (via teleconference)
ABSENT: NONE
STAFF PRESENT: DAVID A. DOYLE, CITY MANAGER
SCOTT C. SMITH, CITY ATTORNEY

CHARLENE CHENG, DEPUTY CITY CLERK / MANAGEMENT ANALYST

ANN EIFERT, FINANCIAL SERVICES DIRECTOR

SHAUN PELLETIER, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

SO KIM, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR

ROSE RIVERA, SENIOR PLANNER

LIZZY MENDOZA, RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES MANAGER

ISAAC AZIZ, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MANAGER
CAPT. SCOTT MERRILL, CHIEF OF POLICE SERVICES
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Councilmember Ackley led the pledge of allegiance.

1. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS:

1.1. RECOGNITION OF SUPERNOVA AWARD RECIPIENTS -BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA

EL CAMINO REAL DISTRICT
Mayor Chun presented certificates of recognition to Alexandra Nottage and Christian Guerrero. El Camino Real District STEM Coordinator Gary Ibañez provided program information and expressed his appreciation.
21

Regular Meeting Minutes

1.2. TRUSTED PARTNER - ALISO VIEJO COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION Mayor Chun presented the certificate of recognition to AVCA President Lisa Naegele. Ms.

Naegele expressed her appreciation.

2. ADDITIONS, DELETIONS, REORDERING TO THE AGENDA:

Mayor Chun obtained consensus to add a Proclamation recognizing Small Business Saturday on November 26, 2022.

3. COMMUNITY INPUT:

1. Michele Saward requested information regarding the implementation of SB 987.

4. CONSENT CALENDAR:

Unless otherwise indicated below, the following pertains to all items on the Consent Calendar.

Motion: Councilmember Ackley moved and Mayor Pro Tem Hurt seconded to approve the recommended actions. Motion carried 5-0.

4.1. WAIVE THE READING OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Recommended Action: Approve the reading by title only of all ordinances and resolutions wherein the titles appear on the public agenda; said titles shall be determined to have been read by title, and further reading is waived.

4.2. RESOLUTION EXTENSION AUTHORIZING VIRTUAL C ITY COUNCIL MEETINGS PURSUANT TO ASSEMBLY BILL 361
Recommended Action: Move to reconfirm findings under Assembly Bill 361 and extend Resolution No. 2021-27 to continue virtual City Council meetings.

4.3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Recommended Action: Approve the Minutes as submitted for the November 2, 2022 Special Meeting and the November 2, 2022 Regular Meeting.

4.4. TREASURER’S STATEMENT – SEPTEMBER 2022
Recommended Action: Approve September 2022 Treasurer’s Statement. 22

Regular Meeting Minutes

4.5. THIRD AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CIVIC SOLUTIONS, INC. TO PROVIDE PLANNING CONSULTING SERVICES Recommended Action: Approve and authorize the City Manager to execute a Third Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Civic Solutions, Inc. for planning consulting services to increase the total compensation by an amount not to exceed $50,000 and extend the term to June 30, 2022.

4.6. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO EXECUTE ALL RIGHT-OF-

WAY CERTIFICATIONS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS FOR ALL STATE AND/OR

FEDERALLY FUNDED PROJECTS
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 2022-29 authorizing the City Engineer to execute all right-of- way certifications and other documents for all state and/or federally funded projects and to sign all state and/or federal funding documents associated with grant funding allocations between the City of Aliso Viejo and the State of California.

5. PUBLIC HEARINGS:

5.1. REQUEST TO APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2 AND A

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT TO ALLOW FOR THE SALES AND SERVICE OF NON- INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE VEHICLES (SP-2022-0001 AND DA-2022- 00001), A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW TESLA MOTORS, INC. TO OPERATE AT 26501 ALISO CREEK ROAD (USE-2022- 00009), AND DETERMINE THE PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM CEQA UNDER CLASS 32
City Manager David Doyle introduced Senior Planner Rose Rivera, who provided an overview. ValueRock Realty Senior Managing Director Dennis Vaccaro, Troy Thomas, and Tesla Infrastructure Development Design Manager Dhwani Dave provided additional information. Staff and applicant responded to questions regarding anticipated sales tax revenue, sales process, hours of operation, vehicle storage, and square footage.

Councilmember commented on the matter. Mayor Chun opened the public hearing and the following person provided comment:

1. Michele Saward requested information regarding parking.

There were no other comments. Mayor Chun closed the public hearing.

Recommended Action:

1. Open and conduct a public hearing;

2. Find that the Project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (Infill Development);

3. Introduce and approve for first reading an Ordinance entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALISO VIEJO, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2 FOR THE COMMONS AT ALISO VIEJO TOWN CENTER AND 23

Regular Meeting Minutes

DETERMINE THE PROJECT TO BE CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM CEQA UNDER CLASS 32 (PLANNING APPLICATION SP-2022-00001);

4. Introduce and approve for first reading an Ordinance entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALISO VIEJO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ALISO VIEJO AND VALUEROCK ALISO VIEJO, LLC FOR SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2 (THE COMMONS AT

ALISO VIEJO TOWN CENTER) PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65864 ET SEQ. AND DETERMINE THE PROJECT TO BE CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM CEQA UNDER CLASS 32 (PLANNING APPLICATION DA-2022-00001); and

5. Adopt a Resolution No. 2022-230 approving a Conditional Use Permit for Tesla Motors, Inc. to sell, lease, and service its vehicles at 26501 Aliso Creek Road and determine the project to be categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act under Class 32 (PLANNING APPLICATION USE-2022-00009).

Motion: Councilmember Munzing moved and Councilmember Harrington seconded t o approve the recommended actions. Motion carried 5-0.

5.2. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE TO ADOPT UPDATED 2022

BUILDING CODES
City Manager David Doyle provided an overview. Mayor Chun opened the public hearing.

There were no comments. Mayor Chun closed the public hearing.

Recommended Action:

1. Find that the Ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15378(a) and 15061(b)(3) as the activity does not qualify as a project and is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing significant effect on the environment.

2. Conduct a public hearing to consider and adopt Ordinance No. 2022-233 entitled: AN

ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALISO VIEJO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTERS 13.02 & 13.04 OF TITLE 13 OF THE ALISO

VIEJO MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE FOLLOWING MODEL CODES INTO THE ALISO VIEJO MUNICIPAL CODE: (1) CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, VOLUMES 1 & 2, 2022 EDITION; WITH AMENDMENTS; (2) CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE, 2022 EDITION; (3) CALIFO RNIA PLUMBING CODE, 2022 EDITION; (4) CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE, 2022 EDITION; (5) INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE; 2021 EDITION (6) CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, 2022 EDITION; (7) CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE, 2022 EDITION; (8) CALIFORNIA REFERENCED STANDARDS CODE, 2022 EDITION; (9) CALIFORNIA EXISTING BUILDING CODE, 2022 EDITION (10) CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE, 2022 EDITION; WITH AMENDMENTS; (11) CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE, 2022 EDITION; AND (12) CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE, 2022 EDITION, WITH AMENDMENTS.

Motion: Councilmember Ackley moved and Mayor Pro Tem Hurt seconded to approve the recommended actions. Motion carried 5-0.
24

Regular Meeting Minutes

5.3. APPLICATION FOR THE PERMANENT LOCAL HOUSING ALLOCATION (PLHA)

FUNDING FROM THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY

DEVELOPMENT FOR ELIGIBLE HOUSING-RELATED PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS City Manager David Doyle introduced Community Development Director So Kim, who provided an overview. Staff responded to questions regarding application process and funding allocation. Councilmember commented on the matter. Mayor Chun opened the public hearing. There were no comments. Mayor Chun closed the public hearing.

Recommended Action: Conduct a public hearing and adopt Resolution No. 2022-31 authorizing the application submittal for the Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) funding from the California Department of Housing and Community Development for housing-related eligible activities.

Motion: Mayor Pro Tem Hurt moved and Councilmember Ackley seconded to approve the recommended actions. Motion carried 5-0.

6. DISCUSSION:

6.1. SECOND AMENDMENT TO CITY MANAGER EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT City Attorney Scott Smith provided an overview. Councilmembers commented on the matter.

Recommended Action: Approve the Second Amendment to Employment Agreement between the City of Aliso Viejo and David A. Doyle.

Motion: Councilmember Harrington moved and Councilmember Munzing seconded t o approve the recommended actions. Motion carried 5-0.

7. CITY MANAGER' S REPORT:

City Manager David Doyle expressed his appreciation to the City Council; extended birthday wishes to City Attorney Scott Smith; announced All is Bright Holiday Celebration and Tree Lighting Ceremony from 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. on December 1, 2022 at Aliso Viejo Town Center; and donation opportunities for Boys & Girls Clubs of Capistrano Valley Operation Holiday Homework event.

8. ANNOUNCEMENTS / COUNCIL COMMENTS / COMMITTEE UPDATES:

Councilmember Ackley: None.

Councilmember Harrington: None.
25

Regular Meeting Minutes
Councilmember Munzing: None.

Mayor Pro Tem Hurt:
 Announced OC Public Libraries Literacy Festival
Mayor Chun:
 Attended Don Juan Avila Elementary School Veterans Day Event  Announced Aliso Viejo Chamber of Commerce Celtic Christmas VIP Event  Encouraged residents to visit local businesses

9. ADJOURNMENT: Mayor Chun adjourned the meeting at 8:06 p.m. to the regularly scheduled meeting of December 7, 2022.

Respectfully submitted: Approved by:
________________________ ________________________

MITZI ORTIZ, MMC ROSS CHUN

CITY CLERK MAYOR
26 City of Aliso Viejo

AGENDA ITEM
DATE: December 14, 2022
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: So Kim, Director of Community Development
Rose Rivera, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCES REGARDING A

SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT AND A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT

FOR THE COMMONS SPECIFIC PLAN
Recommended Actions:

1. Find that the Project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (Infill Development);

2. Give second reading and adopt an Ordinance (Attachment 1) entitled:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALISO VIEJO, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2 FOR THE COMMONS AT ALISO

VIEJO TOWN CENTER AND DETERMINE THE PROJECT TO BE
CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM CEQA UNDER CLASS 32 (PLANNING APPLICATION SP-22-00001); and

3. Give second reading and adopt an Ordinance (Attachment 2) entitled:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALISO VIEJO,

CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ALISO VIEJO AND VALUEROCK ALISO VIEJO, LLC FOR SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2 (THE COMMONS AT ALISO VIEJO TOWN CENTER) PURSUANT TO
CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65864 ET SEQ. AND DETERMINE

THE PROJECT TO BE CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM CEQA UNDER CLASS 32 (PLANNING APPLICATION DA-22-00001).

Background:

On November 16, 2022, the City Council approved the introduction and first reading of the subject Ordinances by a unanimous vote. If adopted, the Ordinances would take effect in 30 days.
27

City Attorney:

The City Attorney has reviewed the staff report.

Attachments:

1. Ordinance – Specific Plan Amendment

2. Ordinance – Development Agreement
28

ORDINANCE NO. 2022-______

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALISO
VIEJO, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2 FOR THE

COMMONS AT ALISO VIEJO TOWN CENTER AND DETERMINE THE

PROJECT TO BE CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM CEQA UNDER
CLASS 32 (PLANNING APPLICATION SP-22-00001)
WHEREAS, on November 12, 1993, the County of Orange approved Site Plan SP 93- 099 for a major retail store and restaurant use development; and WHEREAS, on November 16, 2005, the City Council adopted Ordinance 2005-080, approving the Commons at Aliso Viejo Town Center Specific Plan No. 2; and WHEREAS, on July 20, 2022, the City Council approved Planning Application SDP-2022- 00001 for a site development permit to allow for exterior modifications to the building and parking lot of the former Lowe’s building, including redesign of the primary building elevations, modifications to the landscaping and parking lot; and WHEREAS, on July, 25, 2022 Troy Thomas on behalf of ValueRock Aliso Viejo, LLC, submitted an application to initiate an amendment to the Commons at Aliso Viejo Town Center Specific Plan which would conditionally permit the sale, lease, and service of new (used as an accessory use) electric or non-internal combustion engine vehicles; and WHEREAS, together, the Specific Plan Amendment, Conditional Use Permit, and Development Agreement constitute the “Project” for purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.) (“CEQA”); and WHEREAS, the City may amend a Specific Plan pursuant to Government Code Sections 65450 et seq. and Aliso Viejo Zoning Code Chapter 15.78; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Title 14, California Code of Regulations, Section 15367, the City of Aliso Viejo (“City”) is Lead Agency for purposes of the Project; WHEREAS, the City has reviewed the proposed Project and has determined that it is Categorically Exempt from environmental review under CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (Infill Development);
WHEREAS, the City has determined that none of the Exceptions to the Categorical Exemptions outlined in Title 14, California Code of Regulations Section 15300.2 applies to the Project; and
WHEREAS, the foregoing exemption is sufficient to independently exempt the Project from CEQA;
29

WHEREAS, on November 3, 2022 a public notice was published in the Laguna Niguel News, providing a notice of a public hearing before the City Council on November 16, 2022: and
WHEREAS, the City held a public hearing on November 16, 2022, at which time all interested persons had the opportunity to appear and be heard on the matter of adopting the Codes as amended herein; and
WHEREAS, any and all other legal prerequisites relating to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALISO VIEJO, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Specific Plan. The City Council hereby approves an amendment to Specific Plan No. 2 to allow sale, lease, and service of new (used as an accessory use) vehicles and equipment and within a maximum area of 217,000 square feet of the Specific Plan area; and charging or alternative energy stations with incidental service and repair.

SECTION 2. Specific Plan. The following sections of the Specific Plan No. 2 is hereby amended to read as follows:

4.2 Definitions (Page IV-3)
Energy Facility - Any public or private processing, producing, generating, storing, transmitting, or recovery facility for electricity, natural gas, or other source of alternative energy.

Table IV-1 (Page IV-9)
Charging station with incidental service and repair – Permitted Table IV-1 (Page IV-9)
Electric or non-internal combustion of new (used as an accessory use) engine vehicle and equipment sales, lease, and service – Conditionally Permitted SECTION 3. Specific Plan. The following uses are hereby removed from Table IV- 1: gas or charge station; sale, vehicle parts, new; tires, batteries, accessories, lube, oil change, smog check, and air conditioning.

SECTION 4. CEQA. Based on the review of the entire record, including the Staff Report, any public comments or testimony presented to the City Council, and the facts outlined below, the City Council hereby finds and determines that the proposed Project is categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines section 15332 (Class 32: In-Fill Development Projects). The Class 32 exemption specifically exempts from further CEQA review projects characterized as in-fill development meeting each of the following conditions.
30

First, the project must be consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. Here, the general plan designation is Town Center Commercial and High Density Residential. According to the General Plan’s Land Use Element, the Town Center Commercial designation allows for " a mixture of uses within the Aliso Viejo Town Center including community retail and commercial services, theaters, art galleries and entertainment facilities, hotels/motels and restaurants, recreation and community facilities." The Project consists of a Conditional Use Permit (“CUP”) to allow the Applicant to occupy a portion of the vacant building to sell, lease, and service its electric vehicles.

Automotive use is compatible with zoning and land uses on nearby properties. South of the Specific Plan area is the Town Center, which includes Pep Boys, an automotive parts store. Further south are two auto repair shops. As such, the proposed use would be consistent with other commercial uses in the City, and thus, it would be consistent with the intent of the Town Center Commercial designation as outlined in the Land Use Element. Furthermore, the Project is consistent with the following goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan and therefore, this finding can be made. a. Goal LU-1: Provide a diverse mix of land uses to meet the future needs of all residents and the business community. The Project expands the types of permitted uses in the Specific Plan area. Currently, the surrounding area— and the City more broadly—lacks many essential car services. The Project would thus diversify the available land uses by allowing a new type of use that may attract more tenants in the vacant shopping center. b. Goal LU-3.1: Promote development of revenue-generating land uses to help defray the costs of other uses demanding City services. The Project will allow automotive sales and leases, which creates a new type of revenue- generating land use that was previously prohibited. Additional revenue collected from vehicles sales or lease activity will help defray the costs of other uses demanding City services.
c. Goal LU-4: Ensure that future development is mutually beneficial to both the environment and the community. The Project allows for the sales of EV or non-internal combustion engine vehicles that have no tailpipe emissions, minimizing greenhouse gas and smog pollutants. Additionally, the number of vehicle trips generated by an auto use is only a third of the former shopping center use, further minimizing the carbon footprint and emissions. Electric charging stations are also relatively small, requiring only minimal space, eliminating the need to develop large areas, such as traditional gas stations.

The Project consists of a conditional use permit to allow for Tesla to occupy a portion of the vacant building to sell, lease, and service its vehicles. As such, the proposed use would be consistent with other commercial uses in the City, and thus, it would be consistent with the intent of the Town Center Commercial designation as outlined in the Land Use Element. Assuming that the City Council approves the specific plan amendment 31

and conditional use permit, the Project would be consistent with all applicable zoning designations and regulations.

Second, the proposed development must occur within city limits, on a Project site of no more than five acres and be substantially surrounded by urban uses. Here, the Project consists of a 53,660 square foot tenant space within an existing commercial building. This building is located within the City’s limits and is substantially surrounded by urban uses, including professional offices to the west, State Route 73 to the north, high-density residential to the east, and commercial/retail uses to the south. Thus, the Project meets this finding.

Third, the project site must have no value has habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species. Here, the Project site is located in a highly developed part of the City and is surrounded by a predominantly urbanized mix of land uses. The Project site has been disturbed as a result of past grading activities and primarily contains sparse ruderal vegetation and no natural drainage courses, wetlands, or woodlands. Based on the developed/disturbed nature of the Project site and surrounding area, the only wildlife species that are expected to occur on site include common species typically found in urbanized settings. Based on the specific habitat requirements, none of the endangered, rare, or threatened species can reasonably be expected to occur on the Project site.

Therefore, the Project site has no habitat value.

Fourth, approval of the project must not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. A traffic analysis prepared by the City’s traffic consultant determined that the vehicle trips generated by the automotive sales and service use would be less than that of the previous commercial use. The project will not result in significant noise impacts beyond other uses that are currently permitted in the specific plan. Furthermore, all sales and services uses will be conducted within the existing building. Thus, the Project would result in a less than significant impact related to both localized and regional air quality.

Fifth, the project site must be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The Project site is already within the service area of the Orange County Fire Authority and Orange County Sheriff’s Department. The Project would not directly or indirectly result in an increase in populations, and thus, would not increase demand for additional public services. In addition, the Project site is located in a developed portion of the City that is already served by existing utilities. Given the close proximity to existing utilities, including domestic and recycled water, sanitary sewer, and electricity, adjacent utilities can be extended onto the Project site with nominal environmental impacts.

Thus, the project qualifies for the Class 32 exemption.

None of the exceptions to the use of the Class 32 categorical exemption identified in State CEQA Guidelines section 15300.2 apply. The Project will not result in a cumulative impact from successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time. Due to the relatively minor scope of the Project, the developed/ disturbed nature of the Project site, 32

and mandatory adherence with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and guidelines, any incremental, individual-level impact resulting from Project construction and operations would remain less than significant and would not constitute a considerable contribution to potential regional cumulative impacts in the greater Project region.

Additionally, all other related projects would presumably be required by the applicable lead agency to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local regulatory requirements and incorporate all feasible mitigation measures to further ensure that their potentially cumulative impacts would remain at less-than-significant levels. Moreover, there are no unusual circumstances surrounding the Project that result in a reasonably possibility of a significant effect on the environment. The proposed use does not represent a new or unique use or activity that does not already occur in the City and through the Project region. Additionally, there is no evidence of unique conditions (e.g., unique geotechnical characteristics that would result in impacts to either the project or adjacent land use), either on site or within the Project area, and no unusual circumstances have been identified by the City, other agencies, or local stakeholders. The Project is not expected to be affected by unusual circumstances or otherwise unforeseen conditions.

Further, the Project will not damage scenic resources, including trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources because, according to the California Department of Transportation, the only “Officially Designated State Scenic Highway” in Orange County is the segment of SR-91 (Riverside Freeway) located approximately between SR- 55 and the Orange County/Riverside County line, approximately 20 miles north of the Project site. In addition, although designated an “Eligible State Scenic Highway” and not an “Officially Designated State Scenic Highway,” the SR-1 (South Coast Highway), is located approximately 5 miles east of SR-1, due to natural topographical variations and intervening development, the Project site is not directly visible from SR-1.

Finally, the Project does not include any hazardous waste sites, and the Project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. A review of both GeoTracker and EnviroStor found that no sites occur in the immediate vicinity of the Project site that currently have an “open” cleanup case and are presently undergoing remediation activities. The entirety of the Project site has been heavily disturbed over the years as a result of both the existing development on site and past grading activities. As such, significant surficial and subsurface archaeological and paleontological resources are unlikely to occur on site. Moreover, due to the relatively newer age of the existing onsite development, no structural improvements are old enough to be considered eligible for listing as a state and/or federal historic resource.

Thus, the Class 32 exemption applies, and no further environmental review is required.

SECTION 5. Findings. After receiving public testimony, reviewing the evidence submitted by staff and discussing the proposed ordinance, the City Council hereby finds that the amendment proposed to Specific Plan No. 2 herein are supported by the following findings:
33

A. Public Welfare. Approval of the specific plan or specific plan amendment will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare. Approval of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment (“SPA”) to permit new (used as an accessory use) electric or non-internal combustion engine vehicle sales, lease, and service will not create adverse impacts to the public. Unlike traditional fuel-dependent vehicles, electric vehicles (“EV”) have no tailpipe emissions, minimizing greenhouse gas and smog pollutants. Electric vehicles are naturally quieter than fuel-dependent vehicles as they lack internal combustion engines. Traditional vehicles make combustion noise while the only noise emitting from EVs may be minimal humming. Additionally, STC Traffic, Inc, City’s traffic consultant, reviewed the proposed project and determined that the trip generation quantity resulting from auto sales will be significantly less than the existing shopping center use. Furthermore, public chargers can be installed on or adjacent to any existing parking space with minimal space, unlike typical gas stations. As for servicing EVs, it is limited to maintenance service and no paint or collision repair. Therefore, the noise levels would be equivalent or less than the following uses that are already permitted or conditionally permitted under the Specific Plan:
plant nurseries, dance halls, outdoor theaters, drive throughs, animal grooming and veterinary services, and printing and publishing. Further, automotive uses are permitted in the surrounding area, suggesting that a similar use in the Specific Plan area will not constitute a significant change for the community. For example, a Pep Boys tire shop is located in the Town Center, directly across the Specific Plan area.

Beyond that, two car repair shops are located immediately south of the Town Center. The specific plan area is convenient for automotive uses, as it is bordered by CA-73 to the north and public right of ways to the east (Aliso Creek Road) and south (Enterprise). It is also located in the City’s center near several retail and commercial areas like the Town Center. This location suggests that the proposed use may create an even more centralized location to accomplish other errands and activities, such as employment, food shopping, clothing retail, and dining. The City lacks many essential vehicle services with no major car dealerships. Residents looking to buy or lease a vehicle inevitably must leave City boundaries to do so.

Not only does this make purchasing a car more cumbersome for residents, but it also redirects revenue away from the City.

B. General Plan Consistency. The specific plan or amendment is consistent with the following goals, objectives, and policies of the general plan:
1) Land Use Element, Goal 1: Provide a diverse mix of land uses to meet the future needs of all residents and the business community. The SPA expands the types of permitted uses in the Specific Plan area. Currently, the surrounding area—and the City more broadly—lacks many essential car services. The SPA would thus diversify the available land uses by allowing a new type of use that may attract more tenants in the vacant shopping center. 34

2) Land Use Element, Goal 3.1: Promote development of revenue-generating land uses to help defray the costs of other uses demanding City services. The SPA will allow automotive sales and leases, which creates a new type of revenue-generating land use that was previously prohibited. Additional revenue collected from vehicles sales or lease activity will help defray the costs of other uses demanding City services.
3) Land Use Element, Goal 4: Ensure that future development is mutually beneficial to both the environment and the community. The SPA allows for the sales of EV or non-internal combustion engine vehicles have no tailpipe emissions, minimizing greenhouse gas and smog pollutants. Additionally, the number of vehicle trips generated by an auto use is only a third of the former shopping center use, further minimizing the carbon footprint and emissions.

Electric charging stations are also relatively small, requiring only minimal space, eliminating the need to develop large areas, such as traditional gas stations.

C. Land Use Compatibility. The specific plan or amendment is compatible with the zoning and land use on nearby properties. The SPA to allow certain automotive uses is compatible with zoning and land uses on nearby properties. South of the Specific Plan area is the Town Center, which includes Pep Boys, an automotive parts store. Further south are two automotive repair shops. Northeast of the Specific Plan area is CA-73 and its entry and exit ramps. Northwest are professional office buildings, separated by approximately 140 of landscaped open space. While there is high density residential development to the east, they are separated by a six-lane major thoroughfare (Aliso Creek Road).

D. Property Suitability. The specific plan or amendment is suitable for the location, access, visual character and topography of the subject property. The proposed automotive use in the Specific Plan area is suitable for the location as it is at the commercial core of the City, bordered by CA-73 to the north and existing automotive uses to the south. Further, the Specific Plan area’s location near retail would allow the community to accomplish multiple errands in one trip. Access is also suitable given its proximity to major City thoroughfares like the CA-73, Aliso Creek Road, and Aliso Viejo Parkway. The Specific Plan area is separated from its surrounding areas by large embankments and landscaping, including dozens of mature trees.

SECTION 6. Effective Date. This ordinance takes effect 30-days after its adoption.

SECTION 7. Notice of Exemption. The City Council hereby directs staff to prepare and file a Notice of Exemption with the Orange County Clerk within five (5) working days of the approval of the proposed Project.

SECTION 8. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this ordinance, is for any reason held to be invalid or 35

unconstitutional by the decision of any court or competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrases, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof, be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 9. City Clerk’s Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause the same to be posted at the duty designated posting places within the City and published once within fifteen days after passage and adoption as required by law; or, in the alternative, the City Clerk may cause to be published a summary of this Ordinance in the Office of the City Clerk five days prior to the date of adoption of this Ordinance, and, within fifteen days after adoption, the City Clerk shall cause to be published the aforementioned summary and shall post a certified copy of this Ordinance, together with the vote for and against the same, in the Office of the City Clerk.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of December, 2022. __________________________
Ross Chun
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:

__________________________ __________________________
Scott C. Smith, City Attorney Mitzi Ortiz, MMC, City Clerk 36

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.

CITY OF ALISO VIEJO )
I, MITZI ORTIZ, City Clerk of the City of Aliso Viejo, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that foregoing Ordinance No. 2022_____ was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Aliso Viejo at their regular meeting held on the _____ day of ______________, 2022, by the following roll call vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:
___________________________

MITZI ORTIZ, MMC

CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
I hereby certify that the foregoing is the original of Ordinance No. 2022-_____ duly passed and adopted by the Aliso Viejo City Council at its regular meeting held _______________, 2022 and that the Summary of the Ordinance was published on _______________ and _______________ in the Aliso Viejo News.
___________________________

MITZI ORTIZ, MMC

CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
37

ORDINANCE NO. 2022-____

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALISO

VIEJO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE CITY OF ALISO VIEJO AND VALUEROCK ALISO
VIEJO, LLC FOR SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2 (THE COMMONS AT ALISO

VIEJO TOWN CENTER) PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT
CODE SECTION 65864 ET SEQ. AND DETERMINE THE PROJECT TO BE CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM CEQA UNDER CLASS 32
(PLANNING APPLICATION DA-2022-00001)
WHEREAS, the City of Aliso Viejo (“City”) has found that development agreements strengthen the public planning process, encourage private participation in comprehensive planning by providing a greater degree of certainty in that process, reduce the economic costs of development, allow for the orderly planning of public improvements and services, allocate costs to achieve maximum utilization of public and private resources in the development process, and ensure that appropriate measures to enhance and protect the environment are achieved; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to California Government Code section 65864 et seq., the City is authorized to enter into development agreements providing for the development of land under terms and conditions set forth therein; and
WHEREAS, Valuerock Aliso Viejo, LLC (“Applicant”) is the owner in fee of that certain real property located in the City of Aliso Viejo, County of Orange, State of California, more particularly described in Exhibit “A,” attached hereto and incorporated herein (“Property”).

Applicant desires to amend the Commons at Aliso Viejo Town Center Specific Plan to allow for the sales, delivery and service of new electric or non-internal combustion engine vehicles with a conditional use permit; and
WHEREAS, together, the Specific Plan Amendment, Conditional Use Permit, and Development Agreement constitute the “Project” for purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.) (“CEQA”); and WHEREAS, because of the logistics, magnitude of the expenditure and considerable lead time prerequisite to planning and developing the Project, Applicant has proposed to enter into a development agreement concerning the Project (“Development Agreement”) to provide assurances that the Project can proceed without disruption caused by a change in the City's planning policies and requirements except as provided in the Development Agreement, which assurance will thereby reduce the actual or perceived risk of planning for and proceeding with development of the Project; and WHEREAS, the City desires the timely, efficient, orderly and proper development of the Project in furtherance of the goals of the General Plan and the Specific Plan; and 38

WHEREAS, the City Council has found that this Development Agreement is consistent with the City's General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that by entering into the Development Agreement: (i) the City will promote orderly growth and quality development on the Property in accordance with the goals and policies set forth in the General Plan; (ii) significant benefits will be created for City residents and the public generally from increased employment, parks and or park improvements, and the public gathering opportunities created by the Project; and
WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City and Applicant to establish certain conditions and requirements related to review and development of the Project which are or will be the subject of subsequent development applications and land use entitlements for the Project as well as the Development Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the City and Applicant have reached mutual agreement and desire to voluntarily enter into the Development Agreement to facilitate development of the Project subject to the conditions and requirements set forth therein; and WHEREAS, on November 16, 2022, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing and considered evidence concerning the Development Agreement; and WHEREAS, the terms and conditions of the Development Agreement have undergone review by the City Council at a publicly noticed hearing and have been found to be fair, just, and reasonable, and consistent with the General Plan; and WHEREAS, the City has reviewed the proposed Project and has determined that it is Categorically Exempt from environmental review under CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (Infill Development);
WHEREAS, the City has determined that none of the Exceptions to the Categorical Exemptions outlined in Title 14, California Code of Regulations Section 15300.2 applies to the Project; and
WHEREAS, the foregoing exemptions are sufficient to independently exempt the Project from CEQA;
WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALISO VIEJO DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The recitals above are each incorporated by reference and adopted as findings by the City Council.
39

Section 2. CEQA. Based on the review of the entire record, including the Staff Report, any public comments or testimony presented to the City Council, and the facts outlined below, the City Council hereby finds and determines that the proposed Project is categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines section 15332 (Class 32: In-Fill Development Projects). The Class 32 exemption specifically exempts from further CEQA review projects characterized as in-fill development meeting each of the following conditions.

First, the project must be consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. Here, the general plan designation is Town Center Commercial and High Density Residential. According to the General Plan’s Land Use Element, the Town Center Commercial designation allows for " a mixture of uses within the Aliso Viejo Town Center including: community retail and commercial services, theaters, art galleries and entertainment facilities, hotels/motels and restaurants, recreation and community facilities." The Project consists of a Specific Plan Amendment (“SPA”) to allow for the sale, lease, and service of new (used as an accessory use) electric or non-internal combustion engine vehicles in the Commons at Aliso Viejo Town Center. The SPA to allow automotive use is compatible with zoning and land uses on nearby properties. South of the Specific Plan area is the Town Center, which includes Pep Boys, an automotive parts store. Further south are two auto repair shops. As such, the proposed use would be consistent with other commercial uses in the City, and thus, it would be consistent with the intent of the Town Center Commercial designation as outlined in the Land Use Element. Furthermore, the Project is consistent with the following goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan and therefore, this finding can be made. a. Goal LU-1: Provide a diverse mix of land uses to meet the future needs of all residents and the business community. The Project expands the types of permitted uses in the Specific Plan area. Currently, the surrounding area— and the City more broadly—lacks many essential car services. The SPA would thus diversify the available land uses by allowing a new type of use that may attract more tenants in the vacant shopping center. b. Goal LU-3.1: Promote development of revenue-generating land uses to help defray the costs of other uses demanding City services. The Project will allow automotive sales and leases, which creates a new type of revenue- generating land use that was previously prohibited. Additional revenue collected from vehicles sales or lease activity will help defray the costs of other uses demanding City services.
c. Goal LU-4: Ensure that future development is mutually beneficial to both the environment and the community. The Project allows for the sales of EV or non-internal combustion engine vehicles have no tailpipe emissions, minimizing greenhouse gas and smog pollutants. Additionally, the number of vehicle trips generated by an auto use is only a third of the former shopping center use, further minimizing the carbon footprint and emissions. Electric 40

charging stations are also relatively small, requiring only minimal space, eliminating the need to develop large areas, such as traditional gas stations.

The Project consists of a Specific Plan Amendment to allow for the sale, lease, and service of new (used as an accessory use) electric or non-internal combustion engine vehicles in the Commons at Aliso Viejo Town Center. As such, the proposed use would be consistent with other commercial uses in the City, and thus, it would be consistent with the intent of the Town Center Commercial designation as outlined in the Land Use Element. Assuming that the City Council approves the specific plan amendment, the Project would be consistent with all applicable zoning designations and regulations.

Second, the proposed development must occur within city limits, on a Project site of no more than five acres and be substantially surrounded by urban uses. Here, the Project consists of a 53,660 square foot tenant space within an existing commercial building. This building is located within the City’s limits, and is substantially surrounded by urban uses, including professional offices to the west, State Route 73 to the north, high-density residential to the east, and commercial/retail uses to the south. Thus, the Project meets this finding.

Third, the project site must have no value has habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species. Here, the Project site is located in a highly developed part of the City and is surrounded by a predominantly urbanized mix of land uses. The Project site has been disturbed as a result of past grading activities and primarily contains sparse ruderal vegetation and no natural drainage courses, wetlands, or woodlands. Based on the developed/disturbed nature of the Project site and surrounding area, the only wildlife species that are expected to occur on site include common species typically found in urbanized settings. Based on the specific habitat requirements, none of the endangered, rare, or threatened species can reasonably be expected to occur on the Project site.

Therefore, the Project site has no habitat value.

Fourth, approval of the project must not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. A traffic analysis prepared by the City’s traffic consultant determined that the vehicle trips generated by the automotive sales and service use would be less than that of the previous commercial use. The project will not result in significant noise impacts beyond other uses that are currently permitted in the specific plan. Furthermore, all sales and services uses will be conducted within the existing building. Thus, the Project would result in a less than significant impact related to both localized and regional air quality.

Fifth, the project site must be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The Project site is already within the service area of the Orange County Fire Authority and Orange County Sheriff’s Department. The Project would not directly or indirectly result in an increase in populations, and thus, would not increase demand for additional public services. In addition, the Project site is located in a developed portion of the City that is already served by existing utilities. Given the close proximity to existing 41

utilities, including domestic and recycled water, sanitary sewer, and electricity, adjacent utilities can be extended onto the Project site with nominal environmental impacts.

Thus, the project qualifies for the Class 32 exemption.

None of the exceptions to the use of the Class 32 categorical exemption identified in State CEQA Guidelines section 15300.2 apply. The Project will not result in a cumulative impact from successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time. Due to the relatively minor scope of the Project, the developed/ disturbed nature of the Project site, and mandatory adherence with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and guidelines, any incremental, individual-level impact resulting from Project construction and operations would remain less than significant and would not constitute a considerable contribution to potential regional cumulative impacts in the greater Project region.

Additionally, all other related projects would presumably be required by the applicable lead agency to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local regulatory requirements and incorporate all feasible mitigation measures to further ensure that their potentially cumulative impacts would remain at less-than-significant levels. Moreover, there are no unusual circumstances surrounding the Project that result in a reasonably possibility of a significant effect on the environment. The proposed use does not represent a new or unique use or activity that does not already occur in the City and through the Project region. Additionally, there is no evidence of unique conditions (e.g., unique geotechnical characteristics that would result in impacts to either the project or adjacent land use), either on site or within the Project area, and no unusual circumstances have been identified by the City, other agencies, or local stakeholders. The Project is not expected to be affected by unusual circumstances or otherwise unforeseen conditions.

Further, the Project will not damage scenic resources, including trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources because, according to the California Department of Transportation, the only “Officially Designated State Scenic Highway” in Orange County is the segment of SR-91 (Riverside Freeway) located approximately between SR- 55 and the Orange County/Riverside County line, approximately 20 miles north of the Project site. In addition, although designated an “Eligible State Scenic Highway” and not an “Officially Designated State Scenic Highway,” the SR-1 (South Coast Highway), is located approximately 5 miles east of SR-1. Due to natural topographical variations and intervening development, the Project site is not directly visible from SR-1.

Finally, the Project does not include any hazardous waste sites, and the Project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. A review of both GeoTracker and EnviroStor found that no sites occur in the immediate vicinity of the Project site that currently have an “open” cleanup case and are presently undergoing remediation activities. The entirety of the Project site has been heavily disturbed over the years as a result of both the existing development on site and past grading activities. As such, significant surficial and subsurface archaeological and paleontological resources are unlikely to occur on site. Moreover, due to the relatively newer age of the existing 42

onsite development, no structural improvements are old enough to be considered eligible for listing as a state and/or federal historic resource.

Thus, the Class 32 exemption applies, and no further environmental review is required.

Section 3. Findings. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65867.5 and Aliso Viejo Municipal Code Section 15.82.010, and based on the entire record before the City Council and all written and oral evidence presented to the City Council, the City Council hereby makes and adopts the following findings:

A. Public health, safety and welfare. The Development Agreement (“DA”) is a binding development agreement that vest certain development rights to the property owner. The proposed DA assures the property owner of the subject site the right to allow the sales, lease, and service of new (used as an accessory use) electric or non-internal combustion engine vehicles. In exchange, the City receives public benefits in the form of bringing a major car dealership into the City that would generate a new revenue stream to fund critical resources and provide access to additional publicly accessible electric vehicle charging stations. The proposed automotive use is limited to electric or non- internal combustion engine vehicles, which minimizes tailpipe emissions, smog, noise, and the number of trips. These improvements along with a new revenue source improve, and do not degrade public health, safety and general welfare.

B. The Project is consistent with the following goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan and therefore, this finding can be made.
a. Goal LU-1: Provide a diverse mix of land uses to meet the future needs of all residents and the business community. The Project expands the types of permitted uses in the Specific Plan area. Currently, the surrounding area—and the City more broadly—lacks many essential car services. The SPA would thus diversify the available land uses by allowing a new type of use that may attract more tenants in the vacant shopping center.
b. Goal LU-3.1: Promote development of revenue-generating land uses to help defray the costs of other uses demanding City services. The Project will allow automotive sales and leases, which creates a new type of revenue-generating land use that was previously prohibited. Additional revenue collected from vehicles sales or lease activity will help defray the costs of other uses demanding City services. c. Goal LU-4: Ensure that future development is mutually beneficial to both the environment and the community. The Project allows for the sales of EV or non- internal combustion engine vehicles have no tailpipe emissions, minimizing greenhouse gas and smog pollutants. Additionally, the number of vehicle trips generated by an auto use is only a third of the former shopping center use, further minimizing the carbon footprint and emissions. Electric charging stations are also relatively small, requiring only minimal space, eliminating the need to develop large areas, such as traditional gas stations.
43

SECTION 4. Compliance with Development Agreement Statute. The Development Agreement complies with the requirements of Government Code Sections 65864 through 65869.5 because the Agreement provides assurance to the Applicant for the development of the Project. The Development Agreement specifies the duration of the Agreement, permitted uses of the property, density and intensity of use, and provision of public benefits to the City. Specifically, the Development Agreement provides for a term that shall expire upon the issuance of the final Certificate of Occupancy for the Project, unless an extension of the term is negotiated by the parties. In exchange, the Development Agreement requires the Applicant to provide the City with a eight publicly accessible charging stations.

SECTION 5. Approval and Execution. The City Council hereby approves and adopts the Development Agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and incorporated herein by reference and any conforming changes acceptable to the Community Development Director. The Applicant’s representatives shall sign the Development Agreement and return two conformed copies of it to the City Clerk within 30 days of the City Council’s adoption of this Ordinance. The City’s representatives shall sign the Development Agreement upon the expiration of the period provided by applicable law, including but not limited to Government Code Section 65009, for challenging the following land use approvals for development of the Project: Specific Plan Amendment (Planning Application SP-2022-00001).

SECTION 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance becomes effective on the date that is 30 days following the City Council’s approval of a Specific Plan Amendment to allow for the sale and service of new (used as an accessory use) electric or non-internal combustion engine vehicles at the Property.

SECTION 7. Recording. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65868.5, within ten (10) days following the execution of the Development Agreement by all parties, the City Clerk shall record with the Orange County Recorder a copy of the Development Agreement.

SECTION 8. Custodian of Records. The documents related to this Ordinance are on file and available for public review at Aliso Viejo City Hall, 12 Journey, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656. The City Clerk is the custodian of these documents.

SECTION 9. Notice of Exemption. The City Council hereby directs staff to prepare and file a Notice of Exemption with the Orange County Clerk within five (5) working days of the approval of the proposed Project.

SECTION 10. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance for any reason is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any 44

one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, calluses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 11. Publication. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it, or a summary of it, to be published once within fifteen (15) days of adoption in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published within the City of Aliso Viejo, and shall post a certified copy of this Ordinance, including the vote for and against the same, in the Office of the City Clerk in accordance with Government Code Section 36993.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of December 2022.

__________________________
Ross Chun
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:

__________________________ __________________________
Scott C. Smith, City Attorney Mitzi Ortiz, MMC, City Clerk 45

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.

CITY OF ALISO VIEJO )
I, MITZI ORTIZ, City Clerk of the City of Aliso Viejo, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that foregoing Ordinance No. 2022_____ was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Aliso Viejo at their regular meeting held on the _____ day of ______________, 2022, by the following roll call vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:
___________________________

MITZI ORTIZ, MMC

CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
I hereby certify that the foregoing is the original of Ordinance No. 2022-_____ duly passed and adopted by the Aliso Viejo City Council at its regular meeting held _______________, 2022 and that the Summary of the Ordinance was published on _______________ and _______________ in the Aliso Viejo News.
___________________________

MITZI ORTIZ, MMC

CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
46

EXHIBIT “A”

PROPERTY LOCATION
47

EXHIBIT “B”

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
48

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT

BY AND BETWEEN

CITY OF ALISO VIEJO AND

VALUEROCK ALISO VIEJO, LLC
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into as of the ____ day of __________, 20____ by and between the CITY OF ALISO VIEJO, a municipal corporation (the “City”), and ValueRock Aliso Viejo, a Delaware limited liability company (“Owner”).

RECITALS
A. Owner is the owner of certain real property in the City of Aliso Viejo, County of Orange, State of California more fully described in EXHIBIT “A” hereto (“Property”) improved with buildings commonly known as the Commons at Aliso Viejo (“Building”). The Property is located within the boundaries of the Commons Specific Plan (“Specific Plan”). There are other owners in the Specific Plan but they are not party to this Agreement.

B. The City is authorized to enter into development agreements with any persons having legal or equitable development interests in real property located within the City pursuant to California Government Code Section 65864 et seq. The City has adopted rules and regulations for consideration of development agreements, pursuant to Government Code Section 65865, in Chapter 15.82 of the Aliso Viejo Municipal Code (“Code”).

C. The terms and conditions of this Agreement have been found by the City to be fair, just, and reasonable. The project contemplated by this Agreement is a Specific Plan Amendment to allow the sale and delivery of new electric or non-internal combustion engine vehicles at the Property as set forth in Section 1.4 below (“Project”). The Project would permit these uses with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The public health, safety, and welfare of the residents of the City will be served by entering into this Agreement because the Project will further the goals of the Specific Plan to encourage the sale of best-in-class electric or non-internal combustion engine automobiles, promote and facilitate the usage of clean-energy vehicles, expand the City’s charging infrastructure, and contribute to the vibrancy of the Commons.

D. This Agreement will serve to implement policies and objectives set forth in elements of the City of Aliso Viejo General Plan and the Specific Plan, and, with the approval of this Agreement and the Specific Plan Amendment (“Project Approval”), pursuant to the findings issued in connection with the Project Approval, the City confirms that the Project is consistent with the General Plan and the Specific Plan.

E. This Agreement will provide assurance to the Owner that it can implement the Project and continue its operation and that the conditions imposed by the City with respect to the construction and land use for the Project will not change after the approval of the Project. 49

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals, the mutual covenants and conditions herein contained, and other good and valuable considerations, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

1. THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PROCESS

1.1. Applicable Rules. For purposes of this Agreement, “Applicable Rules” shall mean:
(1) The ordinances, resolutions, rules, regulations, requirements, and official policies of the City governing the development and use of land, including, without limitation, the permitted use of land, the density or intensity of use, subdivision requirements, timing and phasing of development, the maximum height and size of buildings, the provisions for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes, and the design, improvement, construction, and initial occupancy standards and specifications applicable to the Project, including without limitation the General Plan, the Specific Plan, and the Zoning Ordinance, all as in force as of the date of effectiveness of Ordinance No. ____-______, adopted by the City Council on _________, 20____ (“Approval Date”) ; and (2) All ordinances, resolutions, codes, rules, regulations and official policies of the City approving this Agreement by the City Council and shall also include the terms and conditions set forth in the Project Approval and this Agreement.

Applicable Rules do not include any City ordinance, resolution, code, rule, regulation or official policy governing:
(A) The conduct or taxation of businesses, professions, and occupations, (B) The control and abatement of nuisances,
(C) The granting of encroachment permits and the conveyance of rights and interests which provides for the use of or the entry upon public property, as may be approved by mutual agreement between Owner and City, or (D) The exercise of the power of eminent domain.

Owner would not enter into this Agreement or agree to provide the public benefits, commitments, and considerations, if it were not for the certainty provided by the agreement of the City that the Project can be operated during the Term of this Agreement in accordance with the Applicable Rules and the Project Approval.

1.2. Statement of Benefits and Considerations. In consideration of the substantial benefits, commitments and consideration to be provided by Owner pursuant to this Agreement and in order to strengthen the public planning process, the City hereby provides Owner assurance that it can proceed with the construction and use of the Property, Building, and Project for the Term of this Agreement pursuant to the Applicable Rules.

1.3. City Council Findings.

1.3.1. The City Council finds that review of the environmental impacts of the Agreement and the approval of the Specific Plan Amendment for the Project has been conducted in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act 50

(“CEQA”), Public Resources Code §§ 21000 et seq ., and the State and local guidelines adopted thereunder, and the City Council has given consideration to such environmental review prior to its approval of this Agreement and the Project Approval and has undertaken all actions necessary to comply with CEQA.

1.3.2. The City Council finds that this Agreement and the Project Approval include public benefits which are intended to enhance the quality and diversity of the uses available within the Specific Plan.

1.3.3. The City Council further finds that this Agreement is consistent with the General Plan, the Specific Plan, and all other applicable plans, policies, and regulations, of the City of Aliso Viejo, as set forth in the Project Approval.

1.4. Project Approvals. The Project would provide an amendment to the text of Specific Plan, Table IV-1 such that the following uses be permitted with a Conditional Use Permit.

Electric or non-internal combustion engine vehicles must comprise 100 percent of the total sales revenue of any approved Conditional Use Permit and no more than 217,000 square feet of automotive uses shall be permitted at the Property. The permitted uses include:
(1) Sale and delivery of new vehicles and equipment,
(2) Sale and delivery of used vehicles as an accessory use to the sale and delivery of new vehicles and equipment,
(3) Vehicle service, repair, and installation as an accessory use to the sale and delivery of new vehicles and equipment, and
(4) Charging or alternative energy station(s) with incidental service and repair.

1.5. Term. This Agreement shall commence on the date that is 30 days following the City Council’s approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow for the sale of electric or non- internal combustion engine vehicles at the Property or 30 days following the Approval Date, whichever is later (“Commencement Date”) . The Term shall expire upon the issuance of the final Certificate of Occupancy for the Project. The parties may negotiate to extend the term of this Agreement for additional periods of length to be determined by the parties.

2. VESTED DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS

2.1. Vested Rights. Subject to the terms, conditions, and covenants of this Agreement, the Owner shall have a vested right to use the Property in accordance with, and to the extent of, the Project Approvals, and subject to the Applicable Rules.

2.2. Future Ministerial Permits. The Owner (or any Tenant) may seek additional ministerial permits as required by the City, including, without limitation, building permits, as needed to implement the Project Approvals. The City agrees that it will not unreasonably withhold or unreasonably condition any Ministerial Permits which must be issued by the City in order for the land use and construction of the Project to proceed.

3. PUBLIC BENEFITS
51

3.1. The City lacks essential car services that its residents seek. Significantly, the City has no major car dealerships. Aliso Viejo residents looking to buy or lease a new car often leave City boundaries to do so. Not only does this make buying a car more cumbersome for residents, it redirects revenue away from the City, which precludes the tax base growth and thus the general welfare. Therefore, the public will benefit from the Project by convenient access to new best-in-class automobiles and related accessory services.

Moreover, the City will receive significant additional tax revenue from automobile sales, which will fund critical City services.

3.2. The Project is intended to bolster efforts to make the City a leader in clean-energy vehicles and spur growth in energy-efficient and green technology automobile companies. To this end, the City wants to increase access to publicly accessible clean-energy vehicle charging stations, some of which support faster charging than are available from existing domestic supplies. The project is committed to enabling the City to increase its commercial charging infrastructure and to create a robust charging experience for residents and visitors alike.

Therefore, the Owner shall install and provide at least eight (8) publicly accessible electric vehicle charging stations at the Property, of which two (2) charging stations shall provide ports with either CHAdeMO and/or SAE connectors. The electric vehicle charging stations shall include at least Alternating Current (“AC”) Level 2 equipment, which offers charging through a 208 volt or 240 volt AC plug. These stations will be located in the existing public parking lot adjacent to the Building.

4. GENERAL PROVISIONS

4.1. Assignment. Owner shall have the right to sell, transfer, convey, mortgage, encumber or assign the Property in whole or in part to any person, partnership, joint venture, firm, trust corporation or other entity at any time during the Term in Owner’s sole and absolute discretion and without consent of the City.

4.2. Termination. As to the Property and all of the rights of Owner hereunder, and except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, this Agreement shall be deemed terminated and of no further effect upon the expiration of the Term of this Agreement.

4.3. Cooperation and Implementation. City represents that it will cooperate in good faith with Owner to the fullest extent reasonable and feasible to implement this Agreement. Upon satisfactory completion by Owner of all of preliminary actions to be initially taken by Owner and payment of all applicable fees to be initially paid by Owner, in both cases pursuant to this Agreement, City shall promptly commence and diligently proceed to complete all steps necessary for the implementation of this Agreement and the development of the Project in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, including, but not limited to, the processing and checking of any and all of the following which may be filed or submitted by or on behalf of Owner: (i) Project Approvals, agreements, covenants and related matters to the extent required under the terms of this Agreement, (ii) plans, specifications and other documents necessary for the implementation of the Project, and (iii) requests for inspections. Owner shall, in a timely manner, provide City with all 52

documents, plans and other information reasonably necessary for the City to carry out its obligations hereunder.

4.4. Continued Processing. The filing of any lawsuit(s) by a third party (not a party to this Agreement) after the Approval Date against the City and/or Owner relating to this Agreement or to other development issues affected the Project shall not delay or stop the processing or issuance of any permit or authorization necessary for development of Project, unless the City reasonably and in good faith determines that such delay is legally required.

4.5. Notices. All notices or other communications required hereunder shall be in writing and shall be personally delivered or sent by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt required, or by electronic PDF transmission followed by delivery of a “hard” copy, and shall be deemed received on the date of receipt personally, by registered or certified mail or by email.

If to the City: With a copy to:

City Manager Scott C. Smith
City of Aliso Viejo Best Best & Krieger
12 Journey 18101 Von Karman Avenue #1000
Aliso Viejo, California 92656 Irvine, California 92612
Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected]
If to Owner: With a copy to:

Dennis Vaccaro Spencer B Kallick
ValueRock Realty Partners Allen Matkins LLP
18301 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 850 1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1800 Irvine, California 92612 Los Angeles, California 90067-6019 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected]

4.6. Modification, Amendment, or Extension. Subject to any notice and hearing requirements imposed by law, this Agreement may be modified, amended and/or extended from time to time by mutual written consent of the City and Owner in the same manner as its adoption by ordinance as set forth in Government Code Sections 65867, 65867.5 and 65868.

4.7. Governing State Law. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.
53

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have each executed this Agreement on the date first written above.

CITY OF ALISO VIEJO OWNER
___________________________ _______________________________ By: By:

Name: Name:

Title: Title:
54 City of Aliso Viejo

AGENDA ITEM
DAT
E: December 14, 2022
TO
: Mayor and City Council
F
ROM: Ann Eifert, Director of Financial Services
SUBJ
ECT: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
Recommended Actions:

1. Ratify accounts payable checks and electronic funds transfers is sued October 27, 2022, in the amount of $725,675.47;

2. Ratify accounts payable checks and electronic funds transfers issued November 10, 2022, in the amount of $1,238,790.98; and

3. Ratify accounts payable checks and electronic funds tr ansfers issued November 22, 2022, in the amount of $743,562.60.

Fiscal Impact:

Expenditures in the amount of $2,708,029.05
Background:

The City i ssues acco unts paya ble checks on bi- weekly basis and presents i t to City Council for ratification at its next regularly scheduled City Council meeting.

Discussion:

The attached register containing checks and electronic funds transfers dated October 27, 2022, through November 22, 2022, for $2,708,029.05 is being presented for ratification.

All payments have been made in compliance with the City’s purchasing policy and procedures. Payments have been reviewed and approved by the appropriate departmental staff. The issued accounts payable checks and electronic funds transfers have been reviewed and deemed accurate by the Director of Financial S ervices.

Attachment:

1. Accounts Payable Report
55 Accounts Payable
10/27/2022
Description (Item)Vendor Name Amount
101 - GENERAL FUND
REF0011558081-9/8 SDP-2022-0002/CITYLIGHTS-PHCALIFORNIA NEWSPAPERS PARTNERSHIP 570.40 REF0011558074-9/8PA22-001/STADIUM-PUBLIC HEARINGCALIFORNIA NEWSPAPERS PARTNERSHIP 582.80 NOV'22 LIFE INSURANCEUNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE CO. 1,295.84 NOV'22 CALPERS HEALTH PREMIUMCALPERS HEALTH 24,086.40
NOV'22-COUNCIL-CALPERS HEALTH PREMIUMCALPERS HEALTH 3,247.69 SEP'22 ENG 2247/SUMMIT IV-3RD PLAN CHECKRJM DESIGN GROUP INC 328.15 AUG'22 SDP 2022-0001/COMMONS-PLNG SRVCIVIC SOLUTIONS INC 1,320.00 AUG'22 SPA-2022-0001/COMMONS CONSULTANT SERVICESCIVIC SOLUTIONS INC 680.00 AUG'22 ENV21-001/TRANSWESTERN PLNG CONSULTANT SRVCIVIC SOLUTIONS INC 240.00 SEP'22 SPA-2022-0001/COMMONS CONSULTANT SERVICESCIVIC SOLUTIONS INC 1,080.00 BLDR22-00064-C&D REFUND-EDWARD TALLEY/94 PLATEAUEDWARD TALLEY 500.00 33,931.28

CITY COUNCIL
SEP'22-CC PHONE LINESAT&T 247.30
CITY COUNCIL TOTAL: 247.30

CITY MANAGER
NOV'22-PG-HEALTH PREMIUMCALPERS HEALTH 149.00
SEP'22-HR PHONE LINEAT&T 49.46
SEP'22-CM PHONE LINEAT&T 192.70
CITY MANAGER TOTAL: 391.16

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
AUG'22 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SERVICESKOSMONT & ASSOCIATES 3,468.40 AUG'22 BBK-89 PLAYA CIRLE PO#5822BEST BEST & KRIEGER 855.12 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TOTAL: 4,323.52

HUMAN RESOURCES
HR-OFFICE SUPPLIES-HANGING FOLDERSSTAPLES ADVANTAGE 32.31 HUMAN RESOURCES TOTAL: 32.31

CITY CLERK
REF0011561808 &11559162-ORD ADPTN E-BIKES PNCALIFORNIA NEWSPAPERS PARTNERSHIP 737.80 MO-OCT'22-OCT'23 MMASC MEMBERSHIP RENEWALMMASC 90.00
CITY CLERK TOTAL: 827.80

CITY ATTORNEY
MAR'22 BBK - #801 TOWN CTR SPECIFIC PLANBEST BEST & KRIEGER 705.50 AUG'22 BBK - AGENDA REPORTSBEST BEST & KRIEGER 1,478.70 AUG'22 BBK- #801 TOWN CTR SPECIFIC PLANBEST BEST & KRIEGER 3,047.80 AUG'22 BBK LABOR & EMPLOYMENTBEST BEST & KRIEGER 657.30 AUG'22 BBK-MAJOR GENERAL PLAN UPDATEBEST BEST & KRIEGER 3,515.40 AUG'22 BBK LEGAL SERVICESBEST BEST & KRIEGER 23,288.00
CITY ATTORNEY TOTAL: 32,692.70

FINANCE
JUL-SEP'22 INVESTMENT ADVISORY SERVICESFHN FINANCIAL MAIN STREET ADVISORS LLC 3,750.00 NOV'22 CALPERS ADMIN FEECALPERS HEALTH 85.07
NOV'22 CALPERS ADMIN FEECALPERS HEALTH 10.72
FY22-23 SB90 STATE MANDATE COST-1ST PAYMENTMGT OF AMERICA LLC 1,300.00 AUG'22 PARS REP FEESPARS 300.00
FINANCE TOTAL: 5,445.79

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
10/10-11/9/22 ACCT#0202-CH-TV/CABLECOX COMMUNICATIONS, INC 131.29 10/6-11/5/22 ACCT#8802-CH INTERNETCOX COMMUNICATIONS, INC 1,500.00 10/19-11/18/22 ACCT #9302-CH-IT SERVER ROOMCOX COMMUNICATIONS, INC 85.39 SEP'22-4 EOC PHONESAT&T 107.82
SEP'22-CH FLEET COMPLETEAT&T 127.36
SEP'22-EOC MIFIAT&T 160.96
56 Description (Item)Vendor Name Amount
SEP'22-CH 4 MIFIAT&T 164.50
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TOTAL: 2,277.32

NON-DEPARTMENTAL
OCT'22 VISTA PARK LIGHTING SRVPEAK LIGHTING & ELECTRIC INC 107.71 9/1-9/30/22 RICOH 2504EX FRONT COUNTER-COPIESRICOH USA 202.35 9/12-10/11/22 RICOH 2504 BACK OFFICE-COPIESRICOH USA 82.17 OCT'22 VISTA LANDSCAPING SRVNIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 1,028.96 FY22-23 SCAG DUESSCAG 5,880.00
NON-DEPARTMENTAL TOTAL: 7,301.19
C. S. ADMINISTRATION
NOV'22-DP-HEALTH PREMIUMCALPERS HEALTH 149.00
NOV'22-HW-HEALTH PREMIUMCALPERS HEALTH 149.00
DEP-2022 TREE LIGHTING-JOLLY JUMP RENTALSM&J PAUL ENTERPRISES INC 6,441.75 DEP-12/16 BREAKFAST W/SANTA EVT-JOLLY JUMP RENTALSM&J PAUL ENTERPRISES INC 1,674.50 DEC'22 TREE LIGHTING EVT INSURANCEALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC 880.00 12/6/22 BREAKFAST WITH SANTA EVT INSURANCEALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC 398.00 SEP'22 SMP GEN FUND TRANSPORTATION SRVCABCO YELLOW INC 423.50 FY22-23 COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE GRANTWELLNESS & PREVENTION FOUNDATION 2,000.00 C. S. ADMINISTRATION TOTAL: 12,115.75

IGLESIA PARK
OCT'22 IGLESIA PARK NET REPLACEMENTDAVID HAUPTMAN CO., INC 301.70 OCT'22 IGLESIA LANDSCAPING SRVNIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 6,846.00 SEP'22 ACCT#7997 IGLESIA PARK ELECTRICITYSO CAL EDISON 135.13 IGLESIA PARK TOTAL: 7,282.83

IGLESIA BUILDING
10/17-11/16/22 IGLESIA ALARM MONITORING SRVPROTECTION ONE ALARM MONITORING INC 50.00 OCT'22 IGLESIA JANITORIAL SERVICESTEAM ONE MANAGEMENT SERVICES 950.00 SEP'22 ACCT#7997 IGLESIA BUILDING ELECTRICITYSO CAL EDISON 1,447.86 IGLESIA BUILDING TOTAL: 2,447.86

PLANNING
NOV'22-MF-HEALTH PREMIUMCALPERS HEALTH 149.00
8/2-9/1/22 AVTC- PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICESBRIAN JAMES CORNELIUS 11,383.00 9/2-10/1/22 AVTC- PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICESBRIAN JAMES CORNELIUS 10,233.00 AUG'22 PLANNING CONSULTING SERVICESCIVIC SOLUTIONS INC 29,820.00 SEP'22 PLANNING CONSULTING SERVICESCIVIC SOLUTIONS INC 16,780.00 PLANNING TOTAL: 68,365.00

CODE ENFORCEMENT
SOUND LEVEL CALIBRATIONCALRIGHT INSTRUMENTS INC 170.00
CODE ENFORCEMENT TOTAL: 170.00

ENGINEERING (GENERAL)
SEP'22-PW TABLETSAT&T 120.72
SEP'22 ON CALL LANDSCAPE & ARCHITECTURAL SRVRICHARD FISHER ASSOCIATES 4,113.44 ENGINEERING (GENERAL) TOTAL: 4,234.16

LAW ENFORCEMENT-OTHER
SEP'22-PALS PHONE LINEAT&T 44.43
LAW ENFORCEMENT-OTHER TOTAL: 44.43
GENERAL FUND TOTAL: 182,130.40
102 - GEN. FD-CITY HALL

NON-DEPARTMENTAL
OCT'22 CH JANITORIAL SRV & WINDOW CLEANINGTEAM ONE MANAGEMENT SERVICES 4,080.00 OCT'22 CITY HALL LIGHTING SRVPEAK LIGHTING & ELECTRIC INC 147.70 SEP'22-CH 2ND FLOOR PMZ 1ST RE-LAMPCONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS, INC 271.53 SEP'22-CH 2ND FLOOR PMZ-2ND RE-LAMPCONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS, INC 271.53 OCT'22 CITY HALL PLANT MAINTENANCEFOSTERS' GARDENS INC 115.00 OCT'22 CITY HALL LANDSCAPING SRVNIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 678.00 SEP'22 CH DIR ELEVATOR SURVEYDEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS 225.00 NON-DEPARTMENTAL TOTAL: 5,788.76
GEN. FD-CITY HALL TOTAL: 5,788.76
57 Description (Item)Vendor Name Amount
103 - GF-AV RECREATION SERVICES

RECREATION SERVICES
10/15/22 AVR DRY CLEANING SERVICEPRESS-TIGE ENTERPRISES INC 254.77 10/21/22 AVR DRY CLEANING SERVICEPRESS-TIGE ENTERPRISES INC 72.58 SEP'22-4 REC PHONE LINESAT&T 178.76
SEP'22-REC TABLETSAT&T 40.24
9/28 AVR BOTTLED WATER SERVICESDS SERVICES OF AMERICA, INC 57.40 OCT'22 AV RANCH LIGHTING SRVPEAK LIGHTING & ELECTRIC INC 209.79 OCT'22 RANCH PLANT MAINTENANCEFOSTERS' GARDENS INC 110.00 7/1-9/30/22 RICOH C2500 AVR-COPIESRICOH USA 394.64
OCT'22 AVR FIRST AID SERVICESCINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 209.70 10/1/22-9/30/23- AVR FIRE ALARM MONITORINGSIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 1,080.00 OCT'22 RANCH LANDSCAPING SRVNIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 2,262.67 FALL2022-AFS125/AFS127 SPANISH CLASS-9 PARTTLP EDUCATION LLC 660.00 FALL2022-AFS032/034/035 SOCCER-31 PARTICIPANTSROUND STAR WEST, LLC 2,473.80 FALL2022- AFS276/AFS270 PRE-K READINESS-13 PARTREADWRITE EDUCATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC 1,563.00 FALL2022-AFS193-SENIOR CARDIO- 2 PARTICIPANTSBETTER LIFE HEALTH INC 96.00 FALL2022-AFS139/143/185/189 LINE DANCE-23PARTCAROLYN WOJCIECHOWSKI 378.00 FALL2022-AFS014/080/005 HIP HOP DANCE-13 PARTEVER AFTER EVENT PRODUCTIONS LLC 729.50 FALL2022-AFS002/11/008 BALLET-7 PARTICIPANTSEVER AFTER EVENT PRODUCTIONS LLC 310.80 RECREATION SERVICES TOTAL: 11,081.65
GF-AV RECREATION SERVICES TOTAL: 11,081.65
203 - GAS TAX

STREET MAINTENANCE
OCT'22 INSTALL NEW POLE & SIGNAL GEAR-HOLLYOAKBEAR ELECTRICAL SOLUTIONS INC 37,208.70 SEP'22 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MONITORING-ROUTINEBEAR ELECTRICAL SOLUTIONS INC 3,162.60 SEP'22 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MONITORING RESPONSEBEAR ELECTRICAL SOLUTIONS INC 5,604.57 OCT'22 MEDIANS LANDSCAPING SRVNIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 1,586.00 SEP'22 ACCT#6953 ST LGHTS & TRAFFIC CONTROLLERSSAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC 2,515.64 STREET MAINTENANCE TOTAL: 50,077.51
GAS TAX TOTAL: 50,077.51
204 - MEASURE M

GEN-MEASURE M
SEP'22 SMP M2 FUND TRANSPORTATION SRVCABCO YELLOW INC 1,694.00 GEN-MEASURE M TOTAL: 1,694.00
MEASURE M TOTAL: 1,694.00
215 - PUBLIC SAFETY GRANTS

LAW ENFORCEMENT-OTHER
OCT'22 AFISCOUNTY OF ORANGE 1,904.00
LAW ENFORCEMENT-OTHER TOTAL: 1,904.00
PUBLIC SAFETY GRANTS TOTAL: 1,904.00
251 - FEDERAL GRANTS

GEN-FEDERAL GRANT
REF0011555801-9/1 FY21-22 CAPER PNCALIFORNIA NEWSPAPERS PARTNERSHIP 713.00 GEN-FEDERAL GRANT TOTAL: 713.00
FEDERAL GRANTS TOTAL: 713.00
261 - CITY FAC.-AQUATIC CENTER
JUL'22-AQ CTR-RETENTION FEESPREMIER AQUATIC SERVICES (1,208.30) AUG'22-AQ CTR-RETENTION FEESPREMIER AQUATIC SERVICES (1,208.30) SEP'22-AQ CTR-RETENTION FEESPREMIER AQUATIC SERVICES (1,208.30) OCT'22-AQ CTR-RETENTION FEESPREMIER AQUATIC SERVICES (1,208.30) AQ CTR-JUL-SEP'22 SALES TAX REIMBPREMIER AQUATIC SERVICES 647.92 -4,185.28

GEN-AQUATIC CENTER
OCT'22 AQ CTR JANITORIAL SERVICESTEAM ONE MANAGEMENT SERVICES 2,100.00 JUL'22-AQ CTR-MANAGEMENT FEESPREMIER AQUATIC SERVICES 12,083.00 58 Description (Item)Vendor Name Amount
AUG'22-AQ CTR-MANAGEMENT FEESPREMIER AQUATIC SERVICES 12,083.00 SEP'22-AQ CTR-MANAGEMENT FEESPREMIER AQUATIC SERVICES 12,083.00 OCT'22-AQ CTR-MANAGEMENT FEESPREMIER AQUATIC SERVICES 12,083.00 OCT'22 AQ CTR LIGHTING SRVPEAK LIGHTING & ELECTRIC INC 131.91 8/11 AQ CTR MELODEE ICE CREAMSAREEN INC 1,030.50
OCT'22 AQ CTR LANDSCAPING SRVNIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 912.48 OCT'22 AQ CTR POOL CHEMICAL MAINT-MURIATIC ACIDHASA INC 202.24 OCT'22 AQ CTR POOL CHEMICAL MAINT-CHLORINEHASA INC 780.80 AQ CTR-UNIFORMS FOR SWIM INST-INV#77784-02WATERMENPREMIER AQUATIC SERVICES 1,066.73 AQ CTR-SEP'22 SWIM DIAPERS-SPLASH ABOUT REIMBPREMIER AQUATIC SERVICES 1,423.00 AQ CTR-SP/ FACILITY OPERATOR LICENSE KNORR COURSEPREMIER AQUATIC SERVICES 550.00 AQ CTR-DON JUAN AVILA BOO BASH FUNDRAISER - SILVERPREMIER AQUATIC SERVICES 250.00 AQ CTR-AUG'22 INDEED LIFEGUARD ADPREMIER AQUATIC SERVICES 299.99 AQ CTR-SEP'22 INDEED LIFEGUARD ADPREMIER AQUATIC SERVICES 248.59 AQ CTR-JUL-SEP'22 SALES TAX REIMBPREMIER AQUATIC SERVICES 17.08 JUL-SEP'22 AQ CTR-MTR#4987 ELECTRICITYALISO VIEJO BANQUET CENTER LLC 11,382.08 GEN-AQUATIC CENTER TOTAL: 68,727.40
CITY FAC.-AQUATIC CENTER TOTAL: 64,542.12
311 - STREET IMPROVEMENTS
AUG'22 #135 SLURRY SEAL RETENTION PMTALL AMERICAN ASPHALT (19,541.70) -19,541.70

STREETS & HIGHWAYS
AUG'22 #135 SLURRY SEAL AND REHABILITATIONALL AMERICAN ASPHALT 390,833.98 SEP'22 #134 ALISO CREEK RD REHAB-ENT/SR73LOCAL AGENCY ENGINEERING, INC 1,052.50 SEP'22 SLURRY SEAL INSPECTION SERVICESCIVIL SOURCE, AN NV5 COMPANY 21,980.00 SEP'22 ALISO CREEK RD REHAB-ENT TO SR73 DESIGNENGINEERING RESOURCES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 337.50 SEP'22 ENTERPRISE REHAB - ACR TO AVP DESIGNENGINEERING RESOURCES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 831.00 STREETS & HIGHWAYS TOTAL: 415,034.98
STREET IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL: 395,493.28
331 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
SEP'22 AV RANCH LIGHT POST IMPROVEMENTPV MAINTENANCE INC 6,828.05 9/28 #057 CH 2ND FLOOR HVAC IMPROVEMENTHARBOR POINTE AIR CONDITIONING & CONTROL SYSTEMS, INC 3,251.15 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL: 10,079.20
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL: 10,079.20
731 - CFD 2005-01

TRUST FUND
JUL-SEP'22 CFD ADMIN SERVICESKOPPEL & GRUBER PUBLIC FIN. 2,171.55 TRUST FUND TOTAL: 2,171.55
CFD 2005-01 TOTAL: 2,171.55
GRAND TOTAL: 725,675.47
59 Accounts Payable
11/10/2022
Description (Item)Vendor Name Amount
101 - GENERAL FUND
AUG'22 CAA ENG 5046 NX UTILITIESCHARLES ABBOTT ASSOC INC 201.50 AUG'22 CAA ENG 5008 THE GAS COMPANYCHARLES ABBOTT ASSOC INC 226.69 AUG'22 CAA ENG 2243 GLAUKOS SITE 2CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOC INC 226.69 AUG'22 CAA ENG 5003 COXCHARLES ABBOTT ASSOC INC 302.25
AUG'22 CAA ENG 5064 CLEAR THOUGHT CORPCHARLES ABBOTT ASSOC INC 327.44 AUG'22 CAA ENG 2248 SUMMIT IVCHARLES ABBOTT ASSOC INC 500.36 AUG'22 CAA ENG 5002 AT&TCHARLES ABBOTT ASSOC INC 654.88 AUG'22 CAA ENG 5004 MNWDCHARLES ABBOTT ASSOC INC 730.44 AUG'22 CAA ENG 2248-AP ENGINEERING & TESTINGCHARLES ABBOTT ASSOC INC 852.50 AUG'22 CAA ENG 5067 WEBBS GRAINWORKSCHARLES ABBOTT ASSOC INC 1,460.88 AUG'22 CAA ENG 5005 SCE - SADDLEBACKCHARLES ABBOTT ASSOC INC 25.19 AUG'22 CAA-7 COMPUTER STATIONS LEASE CREDITCHARLES ABBOTT ASSOC INC (350.00) SEP'22 CAA ENG 2241 OMEGA PAVINGCHARLES ABBOTT ASSOC INC 125.09 SEP'22 CAA ENG 5003 COXCHARLES ABBOTT ASSOC INC 151.13
SEP'22 CAA ENG 5064 CLEAR THOUGHTCHARLES ABBOTT ASSOC INC 151.13 SEP'22 CAA ENG 5004 MNWDCHARLES ABBOTT ASSOC INC 201.50 SEP'22 CAA ENG 2243 GLAUKOS SITE 2CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOC INC 250.18 SEP'22 CAA ENG 5005 SCE - SADDLEBACKCHARLES ABBOTT ASSOC INC 403.00 SEP'22 CAA ENG 5067 WEBBS GRAINWORKSCHARLES ABBOTT ASSOC INC 403.00 SEP'22 ENG 2251-AP ENGINEERING & TESTINGCHARLES ABBOTT ASSOC INC 682.00 SEP'22 CAA ENG 2250 CITY LIGHTSCHARLES ABBOTT ASSOC INC 688.00 SEP'22 ENG 2250-AP ENGINEERING & TESTINGCHARLES ABBOTT ASSOC INC 852.50 SEP'22 CAA ENG 5002 AT&TCHARLES ABBOTT ASSOC INC 982.31 SEP'22 CAA-7 COMPUTER STATIONS LEASE CREDITCHARLES ABBOTT ASSOC INC (350.00) CP-LE DEPUTY APPRECIATION LUCHEON/DINNER EVTUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 679.44 AUG'22 BBK-PA21-025/FENNEL RESTAURANTBEST BEST & KRIEGER 1,411.00 BLDR22-00245-CANCELED PERMIT-ADVANCED PERMIT SRVADVANCED PERMIT SERVICES 292.58 BLDC22-00015-C&D REFUND-PACIFIC TUSK /95 ENTPACIFIC TUSK BUILDERS 500.00 P#21-1713-CANCELED PERMIT-ADVANCED PERMIT SRVADVANCED PERMIT SERVICES 193.73 12,775.41

CITY COUNCIL
DL-TA 2022 ACC-OC LEADERSHIP CONF REGISUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 250.00 DL-RH 2022 ACC-OC LEADERSHIP CONF REGISUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 250.00 DL - RC LOCC CONF LODGING - CREDITUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM (100.00) DL- RC LOCC CONF LODGING - CREDITUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM (219.77) CITY COUNCIL TOTAL: 180.23

CITY MANAGER
11/18-05/18/23 LA TIMES SUBSCRIPTIONLOS ANGELES TIMES 234.00 DD-CM FASTRACK/TOLL ROADS MONTHLY CHARGESUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 335.00 DD-2023 CALCITIES REGISTRATION CM CONFUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 750.00 CITY MANAGER TOTAL: 1,319.00

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
SEP'22 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SERVICESKOSMONT & ASSOCIATES 3,217.50 OCT'22 BUSINESS OF THE MONTH-ACRISURE INSURANCEERIC WINTER 735.42 SK-WELCOME LUNCH FOR CANDY- AVILAS EL RANCHITOUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 176.00 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TOTAL: 4,128.92

HUMAN RESOURCES
DL-AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC JOB ADUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 195.00 PC - 10/4 CJPIA ED FORUM UBERUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 10.20 PC - 10/08 CJPIA ED FORUM UBERUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 51.00 PC - 10/7 CJPIA ED FORUM UBERUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 12.75 PC - 10/4 CJPIA ED FORUM UBERUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 51.00 PC - 10/3 CJPIA ED FORUM AMTRACK TRANSP CREDITUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM (1.90) PC - 10/5 CJPIA ED FORUM BREAKFASTUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 30.01 PC-10/4-10/7 CJPIA ED FORUM HOTELUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 834.15 60 Description (Item)Vendor Name Amount
PC - 10/7 CJPIA ED FORUM LUNCHUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 27.93 PC-10/4 CJPIA ED FORUM UBERUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 11.80 PC - 10/7 CJPIA ED FORUM UBERUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 11.80 PC-FY22-23 IPMA MEMBERSHIP RENEWALUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 156.00 DL-10/11 STARBUCKS ASSOC PLANNER PANELUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 24.85 SK-9/23 & 10/11 INTERVIEW PANEL LUNCHUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 214.79 PC-9/28 STARBUCKS IT ANALYST 2ND INTERVIEWUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 10.50 PC-9/23 STARBUCKS ASSIST PLANNER PANELUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 13.85 HUMAN RESOURCES TOTAL: 1,653.73

CITY CLERK
MO-1/1-12/31/23 ICMA MEMBERSHIP DUESICMA 200.00
LASERFICHE USERS ENERGOV INTEGRATION SUPPORT&SETUPECS IMAGING INC 39,169.00 CC-OFFICE SUPPLIESSTAPLES ADVANTAGE 20.99
LL-M.ROCHA IIMC MEMBERSHIPUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 115.00 LL-L.LONG CCAC MEMBERSHIPUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 200.00 CITY CLERK TOTAL: 39,704.99

FINANCE
AE-12/6-12/7/22 GOVERNMENT TAX WEBINARUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 475.00 SM-11/4-11/6/22 CSMFO ANNUAL WEEKEND TRAININGUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 575.00 FINANCE TOTAL: 1,050.00

NON-DEPARTMENTAL
NOV'22 OFF SITE STORAGE RECORDSCERTIFIED RECORDS MANAGEMENT 414.55 JR-HALLOWEEN DECOR 99 CENT STORE-REIMBJOANNA RAMIREZ 11.20 JR-HALLOWEEN DECOR JOANN-REIMBJOANNA RAMIREZ 10.47
JR-HALLOWEEN DECOR DOLLAR TREE-REIMBJOANNA RAMIREZ 9.53 JR-HALLOWEEN DECOR HOBBY LOBBY-REIMBJOANNA RAMIREZ 6.45 JR-HALLOWEEN DECOR DOLLAR TREE-REIMBJOANNA RAMIREZ 5.39 JR-HALLOWEEN DECOR 99 CENT STORE-REIMBJOANNA RAMIREZ 20.01 OCT'22 CH COFFEE/WATER FILTRATION SERVICENESTLE WATERS NORTH AMERICA 49.54 PLATES & BADGES - E.LIMONES & C.NOCKJ&M TROPHIES INC 80.92 CEN-COPY & BREAK ROOM SUPPLIESSTAPLES ADVANTAGE 507.65
OCT'22 CITY CAR FUELVOYAGER FLEET SYSTEMS INC 654.36
DL-RETURN HALLOWEEN SUPPLIES-TARGETUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM (8.97) LL-10/19 CC DINNERS-URBAN PLATESUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 192.18 LL-COSTCO SUPPLIESUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 259.38 LL-10/5 CC DINNERS-THAI BITEUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 189.88 SM-10/31 QTRLY LUNCHEON SUPPLIES-FIVE BELOWUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 22.63 DL-HALLOWEEN SUPPLIES-TARGETUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 10.79 DL-HALLOWEEN SUNDAES-SMART & FINALUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 62.88 SM-10/31 QTRLY LUNCHEON SUPPLIES-DOLLARTREEUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 16.16 9/19-10/17/22 MTR#2206 VISTA PARK WATER SERVICEMOULTON NIGUEL WATER DIST 658.60 NOV'22 VETERANS DAY BANNERS INSTALLATION SRVVIGICABI INC 1,400.00 8/29-11/28/22 POSTAGE MACHINE LEASEQUADIENT LEASING USA INC 590.39 NON-DEPARTMENTAL TOTAL: 5,163.99
C. S. ADMINISTRATION
DEP-2022 AV HOLIDAY TREE PLATFORMSPECIAL EVENT CONTRACTORS LLC 2,825.00 2022 HEALTH FAIR EVENT GIVEAWAY4IMPRINT INC 429.92
LM-CPRS JOB POSTINGUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 125.00 JB-VILLAINS WORKSHOP-DOMINO'SUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 79.04 JB-VILLAINS WORKSHOP SUPPLIES-MICHAELSUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 7.79 JB-VETERANS VIDEO-VIDDAYUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 5.00 JB-VILLAINS WORKSHOP SUPPLIES-RALPHSUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 13.45 JB-EVENT SUPPLIES-FUN EXPRESSUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 174.90 NL-EVENT BACKDROP AND FRAME-AMAZONUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 108.47 JB-VILLAINS EDIBLE CRAFT SUPPLIES-RALPHSUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 11.50 JB-HEALTH FAIR SUPPLIES-AMAZONUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 22.53 JB-ADDITIONAL TREE DECOR-HOBBY LOBBYUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 300.41 NL- HEALTH FAIR EVENT SUPPLIES-AMAZONUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 22.96 NL-HEALTH FAIR EVENT TABLE COVERS-AMAZONUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 24.34 JB-TREE LIGHTING SNOW-HOBBY LOBBYUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 27.97 LM-FUN EXPRESS- AVCA SPONSORSHIP- FALL FESTIVALUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 105.62 JB-B&GC PUMPKIN DONATION TABLECLOTHS-AMAZONUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 18.85 JB-B&GC PUMPKINSUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 219.45
2023 JAMFEST STAFF SHIRTSMANHATTAN STITCHING COMPANY INC 416.27 61 Description (Item)Vendor Name Amount
2022 AV HOLIDAY TREE-2ND INSTALJONES FOREST PRODUCTS LLC 13,980.00 C. S. ADMINISTRATION TOTAL: 18,918.47

IGLESIA PARK
9/12-10/11/22 MTR #3499 IGLESIA PARK WATER SRVEL TORO WATER DISTRICT 892.41 9/12-10/11/22 MTR #4114 IGLESIA PARK WATER SRVEL TORO WATER DISTRICT 774.75 KB-IP BASKETBALL HOOP HARDWARE-DENAULTSUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 12.10 IGLESIA PARK TOTAL: 1,679.26

IGLESIA BUILDING
OCT'22 IGLESIA CENTER DOOR REPAIRUNITED BUILDING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES LLC 990.00 OCT'22 IGLESIA PEST CONTROL SRVZAPP PEST MANAGEMENT 75.00 9/12-10/11/22 MTR#1850 IGLESIA BLDG WATER SRVEL TORO WATER DISTRICT 219.11 IGLESIA BUILDING TOTAL: 1,284.11

PLANNING
10/2-11/1/22 AVTC PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SRVBRIAN JAMES CORNELIUS 8,100.00 OCT'22 AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROFESSIONAL SRVREBECCA J CAHA 2,450.00 PLANNING TOTAL: 10,550.00

BUILDING
AUG'22 CAA BUILDING SERVICESCHARLES ABBOTT ASSOC INC 51,874.55 SEP'22 CAA BUILDING SERVICESCHARLES ABBOTT ASSOC INC 48,926.90 BUILDING TOTAL: 100,801.45

CODE ENFORCEMENT
AUG'22 CAA CODE ENFORCEMENTCHARLES ABBOTT ASSOC INC 8,459.06 SEP'22 CAA CODE ENFORCEMENTCHARLES ABBOTT ASSOC INC 8,540.79 CODE ENF-10/11-CALRIGHT INSTRUMENTS FEDEXFEDERAL EXPRESS 14.65 CODE ENFORCEMENT TOTAL: 17,014.50

ENGINEERING (GENERAL)
KB-T4 RECERTIFICATION STATE WATER RESOURCES-REIMBKYLE BOLENDER 105.00 AUG'22 CAA NPDES COSTSCHARLES ABBOTT ASSOC INC 16,969.70 AUG'22 CAA SOLID WASTECHARLES ABBOTT ASSOC INC 10,100.07 AUG'22 CAA PW ENGINEERING-ADMINCHARLES ABBOTT ASSOC INC 2,695.51 SEP'22 CAA NPDES COSTSCHARLES ABBOTT ASSOC INC 15,750.52 SEP'22 CAA SOLID WASTECHARLES ABBOTT ASSOC INC 8,561.73 SEP'22 CAA PW ENGINEERING-ADMINCHARLES ABBOTT ASSOC INC 6,342.40 ENGINEERING (GENERAL) TOTAL: 60,524.93

STREET MAINTENANCE
AUG'22 CAA STREET MAINTENANCECHARLES ABBOTT ASSOC INC 11,877.04 SEP'22 CAA STREET MAINTENANCECHARLES ABBOTT ASSOC INC 6,023.98 STREET MAINTENANCE TOTAL: 17,901.02

LAW ENFORCEMENT-CONTRACT
NOV'22 LAW ENFORCEMENTCOUNTY OF ORANGE 798,643.94
NOV'22 BODY WORN CAMERACOUNTY OF ORANGE 13,912.44
NOV'22 IN CAR VIDEOCOUNTY OF ORANGE 7,823.85
NOV'22 CONTRACT PAYMENT CREDITCOUNTY OF ORANGE (2,066.06) LAW ENFORCEMENT-CONTRACT TOTAL: 818,314.17

LAW ENFORCEMENT-OTHER
OCT'22 MOTORCYCLE FUEL & CAR WASHESVOYAGER FLEET SYSTEMS INC 898.19 CP-LE DEPUTY APPRECIATION LUCHEON/DINNER EVTUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 530.00 CP-LE DEPUTY APPRECIATION LUCHEON/DINNER EVTUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 789.41 LAW ENFORCEMENT-OTHER TOTAL: 2,217.60

CRIME PREVENTION
CP-BUSINESS CARD HOLDERS/LAMINATING SHEETSSTAPLES ADVANTAGE 42.63 SM-ANNUAL CANVA SUBS FOR SOCIAL MEDIA POSTSUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 119.99 CRIME PREVENTION TOTAL: 162.62
EOC
11/14/22-5/14/23-RENTAL OFFSITE STORAGE #A1554LIFE STORAGE #961 1,650.00 DL - 9/14-10/14- RENTAL OFFSITE STORAGE #A1554US BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 316.25 DL - 10/14-11/14- RENTAL OFFSITE STORAGE #A1554US BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 275.00 EOC TOTAL: 2,241.25
GENERAL FUND TOTAL: 1,117,585.65
62 Description (Item)Vendor Name Amount
102 - GEN. FD-CITY HALL

NON-DEPARTMENTAL
OCT'22 CITY HALL PEST CONTROL SRVZAPP PEST MANAGEMENT 75.00 OCT'22 CITY HALL JANITORIAL SUPPLIESGORM, INC 569.37
NOV'22 CITY HALL ELEVATOR MONITORING SRVTHURSTON ELEVATOR CONCEPTS INC 131.00 9/19-10/17/22 MTR#8510 CITY HALL WATER SRVMOULTON NIGUEL WATER DIST 158.63 9/19-10/17/22 MTR#6010 CITY HALL WATER SRVMOULTON NIGUEL WATER DIST 147.23 9/19-10/17/22 MTR#7051 CITY HALL WATER SRVMOULTON NIGUEL WATER DIST 326.44 NOV'22 CITY HALL HOA FEESPACIFIC PARK II ASSOCIATION 347.27 NON-DEPARTMENTAL TOTAL: 1,754.94
GEN. FD-CITY HALL TOTAL: 1,754.94
103 - GF-AV RECREATION SERVICES

RECREATION SERVICES
9/13/22 AV RANCH FIRE SUPPRESSION INSPECTIONMASTER PROTECTION LP 350.00 FALL2022-AFS253 PAINT -10 PARTICIPANTSRACHEL M WESTFALL 240.00 FALL 2022-AFS179 CREATIVITY WRKSHP-2 PARTKIMBERLY KRANTZ 48.00 FALL2022 AFS112/113/041 BASKETBALL-22 PARTBREAKTHROUGH SPORTS LLC 996.00 10/25 OLIVE TREE REPLACEMENT-GOLD COAST FARM-REIMBAARON FLORA 900.00 FALL2022-AFS106/103/100/030 TENNIS-22 PARTJOHN DAVID ALLEN JR 628.80 11/5 AVR DRY CLEANING SERVICESPRESS-TIGE ENTERPRISES INC 483.84 OCT'22 AV RANCH PEST CONTROL SRVZAPP PEST MANAGEMENT 445.00 SEP'22 AV RANCH JANITORIAL SUPPLIESGORM, INC 419.19
OCT'22 AV RANCH JANITORIAL SUPPLIESGORM, INC 730.70
7/25-8/5/22 AVMS FACILITY PERMIT#13507CAPISTRANO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 466.20 8/8-8/12/22 AVMS FACILITY PERMIT#13508CAPISTRANO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 233.10 8/1-8/5/22 AVMS FACILITY PERMIT#13514CAPISTRANO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 56.25 7/11-8/5/22 AVMS FACILITY PERMIT#13516CAPISTRANO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 329.60 7/5-8/12/22 AVMS FACILITY PERMIT#13520CAPISTRANO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 451.82 8/1-8/5/22 AVMS FACILITY PERMIT#13525CAPISTRANO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 89.00 7/9-8/13/22 AVMS FACILITY PERMIT#14466CAPISTRANO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 259.74 7/9-8/13/22 AVMS FACILITY PERMIT #14467CAPISTRANO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 13.50 6/12-8/14/22 ALISO NIGUEL HS FACILITY PERMIT#14468CAPISTRANO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 63.38 6/12-8/21/22 AVMS FACILITY PERMIT#14469CAPISTRANO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 306.36 8/26/22 AVMS ENCANTO MOVIE NIGHT P#14537CAPISTRANO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 169.59 OCT'22 AV RANCH ELECTRONIC CONTROL EQUIP. PARTCONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS, INC 283.33 7/11 AV RANCH BARN MINI-SPLIT LEAK REPAIRHARBOR POINTE AIR CONDITIONING & CONTROL SYSTEMS, INC 440.00 8/23 AV RANCH HVAC PREVENTATIVE MAINTHARBOR POINTE AIR CONDITIONING & CONTROL SYSTEMS, INC 2,938.09 AUG'22 CUSD TRANSPORTATION FOR SUMMER CAMPCAPISTRANO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 2,475.00 RCS OFFICE SUPPLIESSTAPLES ADVANTAGE 94.01
OCT-DEC'22 FARM AQUAPONICS MAINTHASA INC 440.00
FALL2022 AFS203/204 SOCCER TOTS-12 PARTSKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY, INC 676.80 NL-WHENTOWORK SUBSCRIPTION RENEWALUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 220.00 KB-RETURN RIVOTS FOR SIGN-HOMEDEPOTUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM (11.07) KB-AVR RIVOTS FOR SIGN REPAIR-HOMEDEPOTUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 13.51 NL-OUTDOOR TRASH HINGES-HOME DEPOTUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 42.95 KB-AVR BACK HALLWAY PATCH & PAINT-HOMEDEPOTUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 116.13 KB-SIGNS HARDWARE REPAIR-HOMEDEPOTUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 47.51 NL-BACKUP RENTAL SUPPLIES-AMAZONUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 36.40 JB-SUPPLY BINS-TARGETUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 33.26 JB-COFFEE CUPS/ZIPLOCS/GAFFER TAPE-WALMART PT 1US BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 106.66 NL- CLOROX WIPES-AMAZONUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 12.90 JB-COUNCIL CHAMBER ART SUPPLIES-AMAZONUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 9.16 JB-PRESCHOOL CHAIRS-AMAZONUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 349.98 JB-RECHARGABLE TRIPOD LIGHTS-WALMART PT 2US BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 377.39 FALL2022-AFS223/281 HIP HOP-7 PARTICIPANTSFITNESS WITH FLAVOR LLC 180.00 FALL2022 - AFS025 PLAYBALL- 7 PARTICIPANTSOC PLAYBALL EPC 336.00 2023 SUMMER CAMP SHIRTSMANHATTAN STITCHING COMPANY INC 1,520.00 9/19-10/17/22 MTR #0819 AV RANCH WATER SRVMOULTON NIGUEL WATER DIST 127.55 9/26-10/24/22 MTR#1100 AV RANCH WATER SRVMOULTON NIGUEL WATER DIST 218.03 9/19-10/17/22 MTR#5356 AV RANCH WATER SRVMOULTON NIGUEL WATER DIST 326.44 9/19-10/17/22 MTR#7892/6534 AV RANCH WATER SRVMOULTON NIGUEL WATER DIST 644.85 9/26-10/23/22 MTR #0958 AV RANCH WATER SERVICEMOULTON NIGUEL WATER DIST 278.58 63 Description (Item)Vendor Name Amount
9/19-10/17/22 MTR #0973 AV RANCH WATER SERVICEMOULTON NIGUEL WATER DIST 85.56 RECREATION SERVICES TOTAL: 20,099.09
GF-AV RECREATION SERVICES TOTAL: 20,099.09
203 - GAS TAX

TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
9/1-10/14/22 PAVEMENT EVALUATION PHASE IIGMU GEOTECHNICAL INC 37,461.50 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING TOTAL: 37,461.50

STREET MAINTENANCE
NOV'22 DATABASE MAINTENANCE & 39 TICKETSUNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT OF SOUTHERN CA 78.25 APR'22 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MONITORING-RESPONSEBEAR ELECTRICAL SOLUTIONS INC 1,655.10 9/12-10/11/22 MTR #5675 CALLE CORTEZ WATER SERVICEEL TORO WATER DISTRICT 119.43 9/26-10/24/22 MTR #8838 MEDIANS WATER SRVMOULTON NIGUEL WATER DIST 286.47 9/26-10/24/22 MTR#6544 MEDIANS WATER SRVMOULTON NIGUEL WATER DIST 358.80 9/26-10/24/22 MTR #2066 MEDIANS WATER SRVMOULTON NIGUEL WATER DIST 117.67 OCT'22 STREET LIGHTS LS2 ELECTRICITYSO CAL EDISON 1,122.42 OCT'22 STREET LIGHTS LS1 ELECTRICITYSO CAL EDISON 15,851.30 STREET MAINTENANCE TOTAL: 19,589.44
GAS TAX TOTAL: 57,050.94
215 - PUBLIC SAFETY GRANTS

LAW ENFORCEMENT-OTHER
CP-1ST REPONDER 26 HANDCUFFS EQUIP/COPS-GALLSUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 1,904.74 NOV'22 MOTORCYCLE REPLACEMENT COSTSCOUNTY OF ORANGE 65.92 NOV'22 E CITATION REPLACEMENT COSTSCOUNTY OF ORANGE 91.82 NOV'22 E CITATION RECURRING COSTSCOUNTY OF ORANGE 291.45 NOV'22 MDC REPLACEMENTCOUNTY OF ORANGE 1,550.49
NOV'22 MDC RECURRINGCOUNTY OF ORANGE 4,043.58
LAW ENFORCEMENT-OTHER TOTAL: 7,948.00
PUBLIC SAFETY GRANTS TOTAL: 7,948.00
241 - TECHNOLOGY FUND

GEN-TECHNOLOGY GRANTS
OCT'22 CC MTGS/SPRTZONE/SITE VISIT/ADMINERIC WINTER 1,243.21 GEN-TECHNOLOGY GRANTS TOTAL: 1,243.21
TECHNOLOGY FUND TOTAL: 1,243.21
245 - DEVELOPMENT IMPACT

GEN-DEVELOPMENT IMPACT
KB-38 COLONIAL WAY PLUMBING REPAIR-HOMEDEPOTUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 21.44 SP-38 COLONIAL WAY APPLIANCES-HOME DEPOTUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 3,978.24 SEP'22 ACCT 700758434556 38 COLONIAL WAY PO#5719SO CAL EDISON 8.36 GEN-DEVELOPMENT IMPACT TOTAL: 4,008.04
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT TOTAL: 4,008.04
261 - CITY FAC.-AQUATIC CENTER

GEN-AQUATIC CENTER
OCT'22 AQ CTR PEST CONTROL SRVZAPP PEST MANAGEMENT 75.00 AQ CTR OFFICE SUPPLIESSTAPLES ADVANTAGE 189.77
OCT'22 AQ CTR POOL CHEMICAL MAINTENANCEHASA INC 1,173.43 KB-POOL LIGHT REPAIR-SCP DISTRIBUTORSUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 115.41 9/18-10/17/22 MTR #6054 AQ CTR WATER SERVICEMOULTON NIGUEL WATER DIST 371.05 9/19-10/17/22 MTR#2996 AQ CTR WATER SRVMOULTON NIGUEL WATER DIST 226.69 SEP'22 AQ CTR MONTHLY MAINTENANCEKNORR SYSTEMS INC 1,792.64 GEN-AQUATIC CENTER TOTAL: 3,943.99
CITY FAC.-AQUATIC CENTER TOTAL: 3,943.99
331 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
OCT'22-CH SUITE 200-LIGHT SWITCH MOVEMENTPEAK LIGHTING & ELECTRIC INC 439.37 64 Description (Item)Vendor Name Amount
CH 2ND FLOOR HVAC IMPROVEMENT-MATERIALSHARBOR POINTE AIR CONDITIONING & CONTROL SYSTEMS, INC 1,500.00 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL: 1,939.37
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL: 1,939.37
741 - RENEWABLE FARMS
OCT'22 RENEWABLE FARMS-RETENTION PAYMENTAARON FLORA (2,579.75) -2,579.75

RECREATION SERVICES
OCT'22 RENEWABLE FARMS-PAYMENTAARON FLORA 25,797.50
RECREATION SERVICES TOTAL: 25,797.50
RENEWABLE FARMS TOTAL: 23,217.75
GRAND TOTAL: 1,238,790.98
65 Accounts Payable
11/22/2022
Description (Item)Vendor Name Amount
101 - GENERAL FUND
DEC'22 CALPERS HEALTH PREMIUMCALPERS HEALTH 24,933.62
DEC'22-COUNCIL-CALPERS HEALTH PREMIUMCALPERS HEALTH 3,247.69 DEC'22 DENTAL INSURANCECHOICE BUILDER 2,476.12
DEC'22 VISION INSURANCECHOICE BUILDER 392.44
SEP'22 BBK-SDP2022-00001/VALUE ROCKBEST BEST & KRIEGER 1,547.00 SEP'22 SOLID WASTE AUDITHF&H CONSULTANTS LLC 1,530.00
JUL'22 AV COMMONS REMODEL/SDP-2022-0001CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC 3,440.00 JUL'22 COMMONS SPA DA CUP/SPA-2022-00001CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC 1,360.00 P#21-0326-C&D REFUND-HOWARD BUILDING/45 ENTHOWARD BUILDING CORPORATION 500.00 P#20-1598-C&D REFUND-LOCKRIDGE CONST/20 ENTLOCKRIDGE CONSTRUCTION, INC 1,000.00 P#21-1057-C&D REFUND-BINNQUIST DEV/7 JOURNEYBINNQUIST DEVELOPMENT INC 500.00 P#22-0313-C&D REFUND-BRIANS POOL/25 CAPE CORALBRIAN'S POOL PLASTERING 500.00 P#22-0313/EP22-03-021-SURETY REFUND-BRIANS POOLBRIAN'S POOL PLASTERING 3,000.00 JUL-SEP'22 MOULTON PKWY FEES COLLECTEDCOUNTY OF ORANGE PFRD 340.38 JUL-SEP'22 CARITZ 2D FEES COLLECTEDCOUNTY OF ORANGE PFRD 750.51 SEP'22 SAN JOAQUIN ROAD FEESSAN JOAQUIN HILLS TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR AGENCY 2,324.07 47,841.83

CITY MANAGER
DEC'22-PG-HEALTH PREMIUMCALPERS HEALTH 149.00
CITY MANAGER TOTAL: 149.00

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
9/30-10/27/22 TOWN CENTER STORAGE BIN RENTALHAULAWAY STORAGE CONTAINERS INC 92.40 FY22-23 AV CHAMBER OF COMMERCE MEMBERSHIP DUESALISO VIEJO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 5,000.00 OCT'22 FISCAL ANALYSIS FOR COMMONSKOSMONT & ASSOCIATES 6,752.20 SEP'22 BBK-89 PLAYA CIRCLE PO#5822BEST BEST & KRIEGER 1,363.39 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TOTAL: 13,207.99

HUMAN RESOURCES
SEP'22-C.NOCK &E.LIMONES LIVE SCAN FEESCHARLES C STILL 124.00 OCT'22-GF/MD/RC LIVE SCAN FEESCHARLES C STILL 186.00
SEP'22-TB TESTS & EMPLOYEE EXAMSSOUTH COAST MEDICAL GROUP 230.00 HUMAN RESOURCES TOTAL: 540.00

CITY CLERK
REF0011564658 & REF0011567062 NOTICE PROP ADOPTIONCALIFORNIA NEWSPAPERS PARTNERSHIP 669.60 REF0011566696-10/27 NOTICE OF NOMINEES-ENGLISHCALIFORNIA NEWSPAPERS PARTNERSHIP 310.00 REF0011566699-10/27 NOTICE OF NOMINEES-SPANISHCALIFORNIA NEWSPAPERS PARTNERSHIP 353.40 MUNICIPAL CODE CUMULATIVE SUPPLEMENTICC GENERAL CODE, INC 614.70 CITY CLERK TOTAL: 1,947.70

CITY ATTORNEY
SEP'22 BBK LEGAL SERVICESBEST BEST & KRIEGER 22,138.67
SEP'22 BBK CODE ENFORCEMENTBEST BEST & KRIEGER 1,149.33 SEP'22 BBK LEGAL SERVICES-CCBEST BEST & KRIEGER 281.70
SEP'22 BBK LABOR & EMPLOYMENTBEST BEST & KRIEGER 3,411.70 SEP'22 BBK-MAJOR GENERAL PLAN UPDATE-SPECIAL PROBEST BEST & KRIEGER 3,096.90 SEP'22 BBK-LITIGATION PO#5824BEST BEST & KRIEGER 150,369.97 SEP'22 BBK - #801 TOWN CTR SPECIFIC PLANBEST BEST & KRIEGER 5,363.50 OCT'22 BBK -LITIGATION PO#5824BEST BEST & KRIEGER 57,645.58 CITY ATTORNEY TOTAL: 243,457.35

FINANCE
FY21-22 ACTUARIAL VALUATION & GASB 75 REPORTMACLEOD WATTS INC 4,250.00 DEC'22 CALPERS ADMIN FEECALPERS HEALTH 87.86
DEC'22 CALPERS ADMIN FEECALPERS HEALTH 10.72
NOV'22-CH-CASH COURIER SERVICEGARDAWORLD 465.26
DEC'22 ADMIN FEECHOICE BUILDER 35.00
SM-11/4-11/6 CSMFO CONF MILEAGE & PRKGSHERYLMARIE MARIANO 86.25 66 Description (Item)Vendor Name Amount
OCT'22 CITY AUDIT PROGRESS BILLINGROGERS ANDERSON MALODY & SCOTT LLP 14,500.00 OCT-DEC'22 PROPERTY TAX CONTRACT SERVICEHDL COREN & CONE 3,655.41 FY 21-22 ACFR STATISTICSHDL COREN & CONE 795.00
FY 21-22 ACFR STATISTICSHDL COREN & CONE 100.00
FINANCE TOTAL: 23,985.50

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
11/6-12/5/22 ACCT#8802-CH FIBER INTERNETCOX COMMUNICATIONS, INC 1,500.00 10/22-11/21/22 CH AT&T ELEVATOR LINEAT&T 1,336.17
10/19-11/18/22-CH-AT&T FIBER INTERNETAT&T 1,105.52
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TOTAL: 3,941.69

NON-DEPARTMENTAL
11/12-12/11/22 RICOH C5200S LEASERICOH USA 722.88
11/12-12/11/22 RICOH C5200S LEASE INTERESTRICOH USA 7.04 NOV'22 CITY HALL FIRST AID SUPPLIESCINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 189.04 NOV'22 VISTA LANDSCAPINGNIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 1,028.96
DEC'22 STORAGE UNIT RENT ADJ#519ALISO VIEJO SELF STORAGE 55.00 NON-DEPARTMENTAL TOTAL: 2,002.92
C. S. ADMINISTRATION
12/1/22 TREE LIGHTING EVENT PHOTOGRAPHY EVENTJESSICA ALCANTAR 550.00 DEC'22-HW-HEALTH PREMIUMCALPERS HEALTH 149.00
DEC'22-DP-HEALTH PREMIUMCALPERS HEALTH 149.00
OCT'22 SMP FUND TRANSPORTATION SRVCABCO YELLOW INC 472.50 12/1/22 TREE LIGHTING EVT-ADD'L JOLLY JUMP RENTALSM&J PAUL ENTERPRISES INC 558.00 12/1/22 TREE LIGHTING EVT-JOLLY JUMP RENTALSM&J PAUL ENTERPRISES INC 6,441.75 GENERAL PROMO ITEMS4IMPRINT INC 1,060.50
2023 SPRING EXPO GIVEAWAYS4IMPRINT INC 2,359.44
NRPA MEMBERSHIP RENEWALNATIONAL RECREATION AND PARK ASSOCIATION 700.00 LAGUNA CANYON FOUNDATION GRANT FUNDING FY22/23LAGUNA CANYON FOUNDATION 1,000.00 C. S. ADMINISTRATION TOTAL: 13,440.19

IGLESIA PARK
OCT'22 IGLESIA PARK MAINTENANCEPV MAINTENANCE INC 445.00 NOV'22 IGLESIA PARK LIGHTING SRVPEAK LIGHTING & ELECTRIC INC 159.90 NOV'22 IGLESIA LANDSCAPING SRVNIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 6,846.00 OCT'22 ACCT#7997 IGLESIA PARK ELECTRICITYSO CAL EDISON 210.68 IGLESIA PARK TOTAL: 7,661.58

IGLESIA BUILDING
11/17-12/16/22 IGLESIA ALARM MONITORING SRVPROTECTION ONE ALARM MONITORING INC 50.00 NOV'22 IGLESIA PEST CONTROL SRVZAPP PEST MANAGEMENT 75.00 NOV'22 IGLESIA JANITORIAL SRVTEAM ONE MANAGEMENT SERVICES 950.00 OCT'22 ACCT#7997 IGLESIA BLDG ELECTRICITYSO CAL EDISON 869.30 IGLESIA BUILDING TOTAL: 1,944.30

PLANNING
DEC'22-MF-HEALTH PREMIUMCALPERS HEALTH 149.00
JUL'22-AG 52HRS-PLNG CONSULTANT SERVICESSAGECREST PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC 7,280.00 JUL'22 PLANNING CONSULTING SERVICESCIVIC SOLUTIONS INC 10,010.00 JUL'22 PLANNING CONSULTING SERVICESCIVIC SOLUTIONS INC 13,000.00 PLANNING TOTAL: 30,439.00

ENGINEERING (GENERAL)
NOV'22 PUBLIC WORKS WAREHOUSE LEASEPV MAINTENANCE INC 1,035.00 FY22-23 SOC CO-OP WATERSHED AGREEMENTCOUNTY OF ORANGE 7,987.73 FY22-23 CO-PERMITTEE SHARED COST D04-50COUNTY OF ORANGE 20,169.44 ENGINEERING (GENERAL) TOTAL: 29,192.17

STREET MAINTENANCE
OCT'22 STREET MAINTENANCEPV MAINTENANCE INC 19,437.25
STREET MAINTENANCE TOTAL: 19,437.25

ANIMAL CONTROL
OCT-DEC'22 ANIMAL CARE SERVICESCITY OF MISSION VIEJO 110,669.00 ANIMAL CONTROL TOTAL: 110,669.00
GENERAL FUND TOTAL: 549,857.47
67 Description (Item)Vendor Name Amount
102 - GEN. FD-CITY HALL

NON-DEPARTMENTAL
OCT'22 CITY HALL MAINTENANCEPV MAINTENANCE INC 630.00
NOV'22 CITY HALL PEST CONTROL SRVZAPP PEST MANAGEMENT 75.00 NOV'22 CITY HALL JANITORIAL SRVTEAM ONE MANAGEMENT SERVICES 3,330.00 NOV'22 CITY HALL LIGHTING SRVPEAK LIGHTING & ELECTRIC INC 107.61 NOV'22 CITY HALL LANDSCAPING SRVNIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 678.00 OCT'22 MTR#6544 CITY HALL GAS SRVTHE GAS COMPANY 373.54 OCT'22 ACCT#7189 CITY HALL ELECTRICITYSO CAL EDISON 5,394.42 NON-DEPARTMENTAL TOTAL: 10,588.57
GEN. FD-CITY HALL TOTAL: 10,588.57
103 - GF-AV RECREATION SERVICES
CHECK REFUND FOR CANCELLED RENTALZACHERY KELL 2,190.00
CHECK REFUND FOR CANCELLED RENTAL - REFUND FEEZACHERY KELL (50.00) 2,140.00

RECREATION SERVICES
OCT'22 AV RANCH MAINTENANCEPV MAINTENANCE INC 558.00
FALL2022-AFS271 READING MATH & MORE-7 PARTREADWRITE EDUCATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC 1,281.00 FALL 2022-AFS261 SING & DANCE TOGETHER-6 PARTJENNIFER BALES 324.00 FALL 2022-AFS277 PRE-K READINESS-3 PARTREADWRITE EDUCATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC 243.00 FALL 2022-AFS022/018/020 TUMBLE-N-KIDS-18 PARTTUMBLE-N-KIDS, INC 822.00 FALL2022-AFS119 POETRY WRITING WRSHP-3 PARTKIMBERLY KRANTZ 81.00 FALL 2022-AFS194 SENIOR CARDIO-2 PARTBETTER LIFE HEALTH INC 96.00 NOV'22-AVR-CASH COURIER SERVICEGARDAWORLD 465.26
OCT'22 AV RANCH TREE TRIMMING SRVGREAT SCOTT TREE SERVICE, INC 4,111.00 NOV'22 AV RANCH PEST CONTROL SRVZAPP PEST MANAGEMENT 95.00 10/26 AVR BOTTLED WATER SERVICESDS SERVICES OF AMERICA, INC 68.13 OCT'22 AVR EVENT SECURITY SERVICESLYONS SECURITY SERVICE IN 3,563.00 OCT'22 AV RANCH JANITORIAL SUPPLIESGORM, INC 177.11
NOV'22 AV RANCH LIGHTING SRVPEAK LIGHTING & ELECTRIC INC 211.91 NOV'22 AVR FIRST AID SERVICESCINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 98.96 NOV'22 RANCH LANDSCAPING SRVNIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 2,262.67 FALL 2022- AFS044 CHEMKIDZ-5 PARTICIPANTSLAURELINDA HAUKSSON 630.00 FALL2022-AFS285 MUSIC TOGETHER-8 PARTICIPANTSMUSIC MOVES ACADEMY INC 720.00 AVR RESTAURANT ENVIRON HEALTH PERMIT PR0120598COUNTY OF ORANGE 662.00 WEDDING PRO PROGRAM SUBSCRIPTIONTHE KNOT WORLDWIDE INC 5,200.00 OCT'22 ACCT#4551 THE FARM ELECTRICITYSO CAL EDISON 707.11 OCT'22 ACCT#6247 AV RANCH ELECTRICITYSO CAL EDISON 2,769.95 OCT'22 ACCT#6247 AV RANCH TRACKED CHARGESSO CAL EDISON 960.28 RECREATION SERVICES TOTAL: 26,107.38
GF-AV RECREATION SERVICES TOTAL: 28,247.38
203 - GAS TAX

TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
OCT'22 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MONITORINGHARTZOG & CRABILL INC 3,048.72 OCT'22 CITYWIDE ADT FLOW MAP UPDATERK ENGINEERING GROUP INC 4,000.00 OCT'22 WOOD CANYON DRIVE TRAFFIC REVIEWRK ENGINEERING GROUP INC 1,160.00 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING TOTAL: 8,208.72

STREET MAINTENANCE
OCT'22 STREET MAINTENANCE (GAS)PV MAINTENANCE INC 23,756.65 NOV'22 MEDIANS LANDSCAPING SRVNIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 1,586.00 OCT'22 STREET LIGHTS TC1 ELECTRICITYSO CAL EDISON 3,458.24 STREET MAINTENANCE TOTAL: 28,800.89
GAS TAX TOTAL: 37,009.61
204 - MEASURE M

GEN-MEASURE M
OCT'22 SMP M2 FUND TRANSPORTATION SRVCABCO YELLOW INC 1,890.00 GEN-MEASURE M TOTAL: 1,890.00
MEASURE M TOTAL: 1,890.00
68 Description (Item)Vendor Name Amount
245 - DEVELOPMENT IMPACT

GEN-DEVELOPMENT IMPACT
38 COLONIAL WAY FLOORING SERVICEBRIAN BINIASZ 10,918.00 OCT'22 MTR#3825 38 COLONIAL WAY GAS SRVTHE GAS COMPANY 9.45 GEN-DEVELOPMENT IMPACT TOTAL: 10,927.45
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT TOTAL: 10,927.45
261 - CITY FAC.-AQUATIC CENTER
NOV'22-AQ CTR-RETENTION FEESPREMIER AQUATIC SERVICES (1,208.30) -1,208.30

GEN-AQUATIC CENTER
10/19-11/18/22 ACCT#6701-AQ CTR INTERNETCOX COMMUNICATIONS, INC 495.97 NOV'22 -AQ CTR-CASH COURIER SERVICEGARDAWORLD 465.25
NOV'22 AQ CTR PEST CONTROL SRVZAPP PEST MANAGEMENT 75.00 NOV'22-AQ CTR-MANAGEMENT FEESPREMIER AQUATIC SERVICES 12,083.00 NOV'22 AQUATIC CENTER LIGHTING SRVPEAK LIGHTING & ELECTRIC INC 129.15 NOV'22 AQ CTR LIGHTING PARTSCONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS, INC 48.49 NOV'22 AQ CTR JANITORIAL SRVTEAM ONE MANAGEMENT SERVICES 2,100.00 NOV'22 AQ CTR LANDSCAPING SRVNIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 912.48 OCT'22 MTR#2349 AQ CTR GAS SRVTHE GAS COMPANY 4,503.58 OCT'22 AQ CTR MONTHLY MAINTKNORR SYSTEMS INC 1,792.64
GEN-AQUATIC CENTER TOTAL: 22,605.56
CITY FAC.-AQUATIC CENTER TOTAL: 21,397.26
311 - STREET IMPROVEMENTS
#136 ALISO CREEK RD-WOLVERINE/ALICIA RETENTIONRJ NOBLE COMPANY 67,491.73 67,491.73

TRAFFICE SAFETY
OCT'22 #130 ALISO CREEK TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHARTZOG & CRABILL INC 3,562.50 TRAFFICE SAFETY TOTAL: 3,562.50

STREETS & HIGHWAYS
OCT'22 #134 ALISO CREEK RD REHAB-ENT/SR73LOCAL AGENCY ENGINEERING, INC 253.00 OCT'22 #134 ALISO CREEK RD REHAB-ENT/SR73 DESIGNENGINEERING RESOURCES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 4,642.50 OCT'22 #128 ENTERPRISE REHAB-ACR TO AVP DESIGNENGINEERING RESOURCES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 994.50 STREETS & HIGHWAYS TOTAL: 5,890.00
STREET IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL: 76,944.23
331 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
OCT'22 #057 CH STE 200-LIGHTING ALTERATIONSPEAK LIGHTING & ELECTRIC INC 345.33 NOV'22 CH 2ND FLOOR IMPROVEMENTS LGHT PARTSCONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS, INC 240.47 NOV'22 CH 2ND FLOOR IMPROVEMENTS-RE-KEYINGENTRY CONTROL, INC 215.19 #049 RANCH HVAC DOOR SWITCH CONTROLSHARBOR POINTE AIR CONDITIONING & CONTROL SYSTEMS, INC 5,899.64 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL: 6,700.63
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL: 6,700.63
GRAND TOTAL: 743,562.60
69 City of Aliso Viejo

AGENDA ITEM
DATE: December 14, 2022
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Ann Eifert, Director of Financial Services
SUBJECT: ANNUAL MEASURE M2 EXPENDITURE REPORT
Recommended Action:

Adopt a Resolution approving the City’s annual Measure M2 expenditure report for fiscal year ending June 30, 2022.

Fiscal Impact:

There is no financial impact in approving the annual expenditure report. The annual report is required to receive M2 funds.

Background:

Measure M2 provides funding to local agencies through a half cent sales tax measure for street and traffic related maintenance and improvements, as well as other transportation projects. Local jurisdictions are required to submit an annual report to the Orange County Transportation Authority to continue funding. The city receives approximately $800,000 annually in Measure M2 Funds.

Discussion:

Requirements for the Measure M2 funding program include an annual expenditure report for all Measure M2 revenues and expenditures during the fiscal year, including general fund monies expended to satisfy Maintenance of Effort requirements, and fund balances at the beginning and fiscal year end. The City received $902,573 in Measure M2 funding and expended $398,961 for fiscal year 2021-22. Projects funded by Measure M2 include the slurry seal project and senior mobility program. Fund balances will be reappropriated for future projects.

Attachments:

1. Resolution

2. Measure M2 Expenditure Report for FY 2021-22
70

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALISO
VIEJO, CALIFORNIA, CONCERNING THE MEASURE M2 (M2)

EXPENDITURE REPORT FOR THE CITY OF CITY OF ALISO VIEJO
WHEREAS, local jurisdictions are required to meet eligibility requirements and submit eligibility verification packages to the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) in order to remain eligible to receive M2 funds; and
WHEREAS, local jurisdictions are required to adopt an annual M2 Expenditure Report as part of one of the eligibility requirements; and
WHEREAS, local jurisdictions are required to account for Net Revenues, developer/traffic impact fees, and funds expended by local jurisdiction in the M2 Expenditure Report that satisfy the Maintenance of Effort requirements; and
WHEREAS, the M2 Expenditure Report shall include all Net Revenue fund balances, interest earned and expenditures identified by type and program or project; and WHEREAS, the M2 Expenditure Report must be adopted and submitted to the OCTA each year within six months of the end of the local jurisdiction’s fiscal year to be eligible to receive Net Revenues as part of M2.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF ALISO VIEJO DOES HEREBY INFORM OCTA THAT:
a) The M2 Expenditure Report is in conformance with the template provided in the Measure M2 Eligibility Guidelines and accounts for Net Revenues including interest earned, expenditures during the fiscal year, and balances at the end of fiscal year.
b) The M2 Expenditure Report is hereby adopted by the City of Aliso Viejo. c) The City of Aliso Viejo Director of Financial Services is hereby authorized to sign and submit the M2 Expenditure Report to OCTA for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2022.
71

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of December, 2022. __________________________
Ross Chun
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:

__________________________ __________________________
Scott C. Smith, City Attorney Mitzi Ortiz, MMC, City Clerk 72

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.

CITY OF ALISO VIEJO )
I, MITZI ORTIZ, City Clerk of the City of Aliso Viejo, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 2022-__ duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Aliso Viejo at their regular meeting held on the 14th day of December, 2022, by the following roll call vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:
___________________________

MITZI ORTIZ, MMC

CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
73 City of Aliso Viejo
M2 Expenditure Report
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2022
Beginning and Ending Balances
Schedule 1
Line
No. Amount Interest
A-M Freeway Projects 1 -$ -$
O Regional Capacity Program (RCP) 2 -$ -$
P Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (RTSSP) 3 -$ -$ Q Local Fair Share 4 832,600$ -$
R High Frequency Metrolink Service 5 -$ -$
S Transit Extensions to Metrolink 6 -$ -$
T Convert Metrolink Station(s) to Regional Gateways that connect Orange County with High-Speed Rail Systems 7 -$ -$ U Senior Mobility Program or Senior Non-Emergency Medical Program 8 18,467$ 481$
V Community Based Transit/Circulators 9 -$ -$
W Safe Transit Stops 10 -$ -$
X Environmental Cleanup Program (Water Quality) 11 -$ -$ Other* 12 -$ -$
13 851,067$ 481$
Monies Made Available During Fiscal Year 14 902,573$ (40,196)$ 15 1,753,640$ (39,715)$
Expenditures During Fiscal Year 16 398,961$ -$
A-M Freeway Projects 17 -$ -$
O Regional Capacity Program (RCP) 18 -$ -$
P Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (RTSSP) 19 -$ -$ Q Local Fair Share 20 1,284,071$ (38,353)$
R High Frequency Metrolink Service 21 -$ -$
S Transit Extensions to Metrolink 22 -$ -$
T Convert Metrolink Station(s) to Regional Gateways that connect Orange County with High-Speed Rail Systems 23 -$ -$ U Senior Mobility Program or Senior Non-Emergency Medical Program 24 70,608$ (1,362)$
V Community Based Transit/Circulators 25 -$ -$
W Safe Transit Stops 26 -$ -$
X Environmental Cleanup Program (Water Quality) 27 -$ -$ Other* 28 -$ -$
* Please provide a specific description
Balances at End of Fiscal Year
Balances at Beginning of Fiscal Year
Balances at Beginning of Fiscal Year
Description
Total Monies Available (Sum Lines 13 & 14)
74 City of Aliso Viejo M2 Expenditure Report
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2022
Sources and Uses
Schedule 2
Line
No. Amount Interest
A-M Freeway Projects 1 -$ -$
O Regional Capacity Program (RCP) 2 -$ -$
P Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (RTSSP) 3 -$ -$ Q Local Fair Share 4 846,159$ (38,353)$
R High Frequency Metrolink Service 5 -$ -$
S Transit Extensions to Metrolink 6 -$ -$
T Convert Metrolink Station(s) to Regional Gateways that connect Orange County with High-Speed Rail Systems 7 -$ -$
U Senior Mobility Program or Senior Non-Emergency Medical Program 8 56,414$ (1,843)$ V Community Based Transit/Circulators 9 -$ -$
W Safe Transit Stops 10 -$ -$
X Environmental Cleanup Program (Water Quality) 11 -$ -$ Other* 12 -$ -$
13 902,573$ (40,196)$
A-M Freeway Projects 14 -$ -$
O Regional Capacity Program (RCP) 15 -$ -$
P Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (RTSSP) 16 -$ -$ Q Local Fair Share 17 394,688$ -$
R High Frequency Metrolink Service 18 -$ -$
S Transit Extensions to Metrolink 19 -$ -$
T Convert Metrolink Station(s) to Regional Gateways that connect Orange County with High-Speed Rail Systems
20 -$ -$
U Senior Mobility Program or Senior Non-Emergency Medical Program 21 4,273$ -$ V Community Based Transit/Circulators 22 -$ -$
W Safe Transit Stops 23 -$ -$
X Environmental Cleanup Program (Water Quality) 24 -$ -$ Other* 25 -$ -$
26 398,961$ -$
27 503,612$ (40,196)$
* Interest is negative due to market valuation entries during the end of the fiscal year 2021-22.

TOTAL BALANCE (Subtract line 26 from 13)
TOTAL EXPENDITURES (Sum lines 14 to 25)
Description
Revenues:

TOTAL REVENUES (Sum lines 1 to 12)
Expenditures:
75 City of Aliso Viejo
M2 Expenditure Report
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2022
Streets and Roads Detailed Use of Funds
Schedule 3
Line
No. MOE Developer /
Impact Fees+ O O
Interest P P
Interest Q Q
Interest X X
Interest
Other
M22
Other
M2
Interest
Other* TOTAL
1 137,071$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 137,071$ New Street Construction 2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Street Reconstruction 3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 394,688$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 394,688$ Signals, Safety Devices, & Street Lights 4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Pedestrian Ways & Bikepaths 5 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Storm Drains 6 7,931$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 7,931$ Storm Damage 7 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 8 7,931$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 394,688$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 402,619$ Right of Way Acquisition 9 -$ -$ -$
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
10 7,931$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 394,688$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 402,619$ Patching 11 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Overlay & Sealing 12 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Street Lights & Traffic Signals 13 416,118$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 416,118$ Storm Damage 14 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Other Street Purpose Maintenance 15 18,648$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 18,648$ 16 434,766$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 434,766$ 17 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,273$ -$ -$ 4,273$
18 579,768$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 394,688$ -$ -$ -$ 4,273$ -$ -$ 978,729$ 19 1 Includes direct charges for staff time Legend
2 Other M2 includes A-M, R,S,T,U,V, and W Project
+ Transportation related only A-M
* Please provide a specific description O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Other - Senior Mobility Program
Total Maintenance1
GRAND TOTALS (Sum Lines 1, 10, 16, 17)
Type of Expenditure
Indirect and/or Overhead
Construction & Right-of-Way
Total Construction1
Total Construction & Right-of-Way
Maintenance
Environmental Cleanup Program (Water Quality)
Senior Mobility Program or Senior Non-Emergency Medical Program Community Based Transit/Circulators
Convert Metrolink Station(s) to Regional Gateways that connect Orange County with High-Speed Rail Systems
Freeway Projects
Regional Capacity Program (RCP)
Local Fair Share
Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (RTSSP) Finance Director Confirmation
Any California State Constitution Article XIX streets and road eligible expenditure may be “counted” in local jurisdictions’ calculation of MOE if the activity is supported (funded) by a local jurisdictions’ discretionary funds (e.g. general fund). The California State Controller also provides useful information on Article XIX and the Streets and Highways Code eligible expenditures in its “Guidelines Relating to Gas Tax Expenditures for Cities and Counties”. I have reviewed and am aware of these guidelines and their applicability in calculating and reporting on Maintenance of Effort expenditures.

Finance Director initial: _______________
Description
Transit Extensions to Metrolink
Safe Transit Stops
High Frequency Metrolink Service
76 City of Aliso Viejo
M2 Expenditure Report
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2022
Local Fair Share Project List
Schedule 4

PROJECT NAME AMOUNT EXPENDED
Slurry Seal (#133) 394,688.00$
394,688.00$
77 78
City of Aliso Viejo

AGENDA ITEM
DATE: December 14, 2022
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Mitzi Ortiz, Director of Government Services
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION EXTENSION AUTHORIZING VIRTUAL CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS PURSUANT TO ASSEMBLY BILL 361
Recommended Action:

Move to reconfirm findings under Assembly Bill 361 and extend Resolution No. 2021-27 to continue virtual City Council meetings.

Fiscal Impact:

None.

Background:

Assembly Bill 361 (“AB 361”), effective October 1, 2021, waives certain provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act and allows legislative bodies to meet virtually until January 1, 2024, provided there is a state of emergency and either:

1. state or local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing; or

2. the legislative body determines by majority vote that meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health and safety of attendees.

Under AB 361, the City is not required to allow public access at teleconference locations; however, the City must provide access to meetings via a call-in option or internet-based service option so that members of the public may address the City Council in real time.

Additionally, every 30 days the City Council must reconsider the state of emergency and make the determination to continue meeting virtually in accordance with AB 361.

Discussion:

On October 20, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2021-27 authorizing virtual City Council meetings under AB 361, having found and determined that (1) a state of emergency related to COVID-19 is currently in effect; (2) state and local officials have 79

recommended measures to promote social distancing in connection with COVID-19; and (3) due to the COVID-19 emergency, meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health and safety of attendees. At subsequent meetings, the City Council has reconfirmed the findings and extended the resolution pursuant to AB 361.

Staff will agendize this matter for consideration at each City Council meeting until such time as the state of emergency has been terminated or the City Council determines that conditions no longer exist to prevent meeting safely in person.

Staff recommends that the City Council reconfirm the findings in Resolution No. 2021-27 continue to exist and approve the extension of the resolution.

Attachment:

1. Resolution No. 2021-27
80

RESOLUTION NO. 2021-27

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALISO

VIEJO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING VIRTUAL CITY COUNCIL
MEETINGS PURSUANT TO ASSEMBLY BILL 361

WHEREAS, the Aliso Viejo City Council (“Council”) is committed to preserving and nurturing public access and participation in meetings of the Council; and

WHEREAS, with the exception of closed sessions, all meetings of the Council are open and public, as required by the Ralph M. Brown Act (Cal. Gov. Code 54950 – 54963), so that any member of the public may attend and participate in the Council’s meetings; and

WHEREAS, starting in March 2020, in response to the spread of COVID-19 in the State of California, the Governor issued a number of executive orders aimed at containing the COVID-19 virus; and

WHEREAS, among other things, these orders wa ived certain requirements of the Brown Act to allow legislative bodies to meet virtually; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Governor’s executive orders, the Council has been holding virtual meetings during the pandemic in the interest of protecting the health and safety of the public, staff, and Councilmembers; and

WHEREAS, the Governor’s executive order related to the suspension of certain provisions of the Brown Act expires on September 30, 2021; and

WHEREAS, on September 16, 2021 the Governor signed Assembly Bill 361 (in effect as of October 1, 2021 – Government Code Section 54953(e)), which allows legislative bodies to meet virtually provided there is a state of emergency, and either (1) state or local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing; or (2) the legislative body determines by ma jority vote that meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health and safety of attendees; and

WHEREAS, such conditions now exist in Orange County, specifically, a state of emergency has been proclaimed related to COVID-19, state and local officials are recommending measures to promote social distancing, and because of the ongoing threat of COVID-19, meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health and safety of attendees;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE ALISO VIEJO CITY COUNCIL AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Recitals. The Recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated into this Resolution by this reference. 81

Section 2. Remote Teleconference Meetings. Consistent with the provisions of Government Code Section 54953(e), the Council finds and determines that (1) a state ofemergency related to COVID-19 is currently in effect; (2) state and local officials have recommended measures to promote social distancing in connection with COVID-19; and (3) due to the COVID-19 emergency, meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health and safety of attendees. Based on such facts, findings and determinations, the Council authorizes staff to conduct remote teleconference meetings of the Council under the provisions of Government Code Section 54953(e).

Section 3. Effective Date of Resolution. This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption and shall be effective for 30 days unless earlier extended by a majority vote of the Council in accordance with Section 4 of this Resolution.

Section 4. Extension by Motion. The Council may extend the application of this Resolution by motion and majority vote by up to 30 days at a time, provided that it makes all necessary findings consistent with and pursuant to the requirements of Section 54953(e)(3).

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of October, 2021.

Tiffany Ackley
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:

Scott C. Smith Mitzi Ortiz, MMC
City Attorney City Clerk
Mitzziiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii Ortiz,z,z,z,,z,z,z,z,,zz,zz,,,z,,z,,zz,,z,zz,,zz,z,zzzzz,z,,z,zzzz,,,zz,,,z,z,, MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMC City Clerk
82

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.

CITY OF ALISO VIEJO )
I, MITZI ORTIZ, City Clerk of the City of Aliso Viejo, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that foregoing Resolution No. 2021-27 was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Aliso Viejo at their regular meeting held on the 20th day of October 2021, by the following roll call vote, to wit:

AYES: Mayor Ackley, Mayor Pro Tem Chun, Councilmembers Harrington, Hurt and Munzing
NOES: None
ABSENT: None

MITZI ORTIZ, MMC

CITY CLERK
(SEAL)

MITZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZI ORTITITITITTITITTITITITITIITIITITITTITITITTITTITITITITTTITTITITITITTITITTTTTTITITITTTTITIITITITITITTTITITITTTITITITITTTTTITITTTTTTITTITTIITITTTITIITITITTIITTTITIITIITIIITTIITTITITIITTTTTTTITTTTTTTITITTTTTTTITTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT ZZZ,ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ MMC

CITY CLERK
83 City of Aliso Viejo

AGENDA ITEM
DATE: December 14, 2022
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Mitzi Ortiz, Director of Government Services
SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL REORGANIZATION
Recommended Action:

Select a Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem in accordance with Ordinance No. 2001-022, for the 2023 calendar year.

Fiscal Impact:

There is no fiscal impact to this action.

Background:

Ordinance No. 2001-022 provides for the selection of the Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem on an annual basis at the first meeting of the City Council in December of each year with their terms commencing on January 1st the following year.

Discussion:

To conduct the selection of the next Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem, the following steps are recommended:
 The City Clerk calls for a motion to nominate a member of the City Council to serve as Mayor for 2023.
 The City Clerk requests any additional nominations.
 Nominations are closed.
 A roll call vote is taken by the City Clerk for each nominee until a successful nominee receives a majority vote and is declared Mayor.

The process is then repeated for the position of Mayor Pro Tem.

Additionally, Council Policy 400-2 states that the Council seating order shall be at the discretion of the Mayor.
84 City of Aliso Viejo

AGENDA ITEM
DATE: December 14, 2022
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Mitzi Ortiz, Director of Government Services
SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS TO SERVE ON REGIONAL BOARDS,

COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES
Recommended Actions:

1. Review and update Council appointment list to regional boards, commissions, and committees; and

2. If needed, adopt a Resolution designating and appointing the City’s representative to the Orange County Fire Authority Board of Directors.

Fiscal Impact:

There is no fiscal impact to this action.

Background:

Councilmembers serve on various regional boards, commissions, and committees in order to represent the interests of the City of Aliso Viejo. The City Council traditionally reviews these appointments each year, following Council reorganization.

Discussion:

On November 30, 2022, the City Council received the current list of board, commission, and committee appointments. Staff did not receive any requests for changes to the Council-appointed regional appointments.

The following agency requires the Mayor to serve as the delegate; therefore, the appointment is automatic:

REGIONAL APPOINTMENTS
LOCC – OC Division City Selection Committee Mayor
Additionally, the City Council previously took action to make the following appointments to local boards and committees as indicated below:
85

LOCAL APPOINTMENTS
Board / Committee Appointment Date
City / CUSD Committee Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem 2/15/17
City / AVCA Committee Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem 2/15/17
Aliso Viejo Ranch Foundation Chun and Hurt 12/6/20
Staff recommends the City Council discuss and update the appointments for the 2023 calendar year. Staff will notify the various agencies of any changes to the appointments.

Changes to the OCFA delegate appointment must be formalized by Resolution, which is included as Attachment No. 2.

Please note that some appointments require filing of a Form 700 Statement of Economic Interests at the time of assuming or leaving office and annually. The Form 700 filings must be submitted directly to the subject agency.

Attachments:

1. 2022 Appointment List

2. Resolution Ratifying OCFA Appointment
86

* If the Mayor is unable to attend, he or she will select an alternate; if the Mayor is unavailable to select an alternate or has not chosen an alternate, the Mayor Pro Tem would automatically become the alternate.

If the Mayor Pro Tem is not available, the alternate would then be the pr eceding Mayor, and so on.

ALISO VIEJO CITY COUNCIL
REGIONAL APPOINTMENT LIST – 2022
(APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON 12/1/2021)

ORGANIZATION MEMBER ALTERNATE DAY/TIME LOCATION CONTACT City Council Appointments – Regional
Library Advisory
Board
Hurt Chun Quarterly, third
Thursday - 4:00
p.m.
1501 E. Saint
Andrew Place,
Santa Ana
Alejandra (Alex) Martinez
(714) 566-3011
alejandra.martinez.occr.ocgov.com
None
SJHTCA
San Joaquin Hills
Transportation
Corridor Agency
Hurt Chun Second Thursday
- 9:30 a.m.

TCA Offices
125 Pacifica, Suite
100, Irvine
Kaylee Doolittle
(949) 754-3492
[email protected]
[email protected]
$120 per mtg.
(max 18 per
quarter) & mileage
Files 700 form
OCFA
Orange County
Fire Authority
Chun N/A Fourth Thursday,
every other month
- 6:00 p.m.

OCFA Offices
1 Fire Authority
Road, Irvine
Maria Huizar
(714) 573-6040
[email protected]
$100 per mtg.

Files 700 form
Orange County
Vector Control
District
Hurt
(2 yr. term;
expires 1/1/23)
N/A Third Thursday -
3:00 p.m.

OCVCD Offices
13001 Garden
Grove Blvd
Tawnia Pett
(949) 971-2421
[email protected]
$100 per mtg.

Files 700 form
California JPIA Ackley Chun Annually CJPIA Offices
8081 Moody
Street, La Palma
Veronica Ruiz
(562) 467-8736
[email protected]
$100 stipend,
travel & lodging
CGA
Coastal Greenbelt
Authority
Ackley Chun Third Thursday,
every other month
- 3:00 p.m.

Council Chambers
24264 El Toro Rd,
Laguna Woods
Tene Greene
(949) 923-2200
[email protected]
None
South Orange
County Watershed
Mgmt Area
Ackley Public Works Quarterly, first
Thursday - 2:30
p.m.

Council Chambers
30111 Crown
Valley, LN
Jenna Voss
(714) 955-0652
[email protected]
None
Mayor Appointments – Regional
LOCC - Orange
County Division City
Selection
Committee
Mayor

Appointed as
needed*
As needed,
precedes League
Division meeting
Varies (714) 972-0077 None

87

* If the Mayor is unable to attend, he or she will select an alternate; if the Mayor is unavailable to select an alternate or has not chosen an alternate, the Mayor Pro Tem would automatically become the alternate.

If the Mayor Pro Tem is not available, the alternate would then be the pr eceding Mayor, and so on.

ALISO VIEJO CITY COUNCIL
LOCAL APPOINTMENT LIST – 2021

ORGANIZATION MEMBER MEMBER DAY/TIME LOCATION
City Council Appointments – Local
AV Ranch Foundation Chun Hurt As Needed Aliso Viejo City Hall Mayor / Mayor Pro Tem Appointments – Local
City / CUSD Committee Mayor

Mayor Pro Tem As Needed Aliso Viejo City Hall
City / AVCA Committee

Mayor

Mayor Pro Tem As Needed

Aliso Viejo City Hall

ORGANIZATIONS WITH CITY REPRESENTATIVES NOT APPOINTED BY CITY COUNCIL

ORGANIZATION MEMBER MEMBER DAY/TIME LOCATION
SCAG Transportation
Committee
Chun First Thursday of each month
at 10:30 a.m.

SCAG Main Office
818 W. 7th St., 12th Fl
Los Angeles

Orange County Waste
Management Commission
Harrington Quarterly, second Thursday of
the month (Mar., Jun., Sep.,
Dec) at 2:00 p.m.

OC Waste & Recycling
300 N. Flower, Rm
467
Santa Ana

ACC-OC Board of Directors Harrington Mission Viejo City Hall 200 Civic Center Drive
Mission Viejo

88

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALISO

VIEJO, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING AND APPOINTING ITS
REPRESENTATIVE TO THE ORANGE COUNTY FIRE AUTHORITY’S

BOARD OF DIRECTORS
WHEREAS, the City, as a “member” of the Orange County Fire Authority Joint Powers Authority (JPA) is entitled to appoint a representative director (“Director”) to the Orange County Fire Authority’s Board of Directors; and
WHEREAS, each member agency, by resolution of its governing body, shall designate and appoint one representative to act as its Director on the Authority Board of Directors, except the County whose Board of Supervisors shall appoint two representatives to act as its Directors; and
WHEREAS, each Director shall be a current elected member of the governing body; and WHEREAS, each Director shall hold office until the selection of a successor by the appointing body; and
WHEREAS, each Director is to serve at the pleasure of his or her appointing body and may be removed at any time, with or without cause, at the sole discretion of that appointing body; and
WHEREAS, any vacancy shall be filled in the same manner as the original appointment of a Director.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Aliso Viejo, California, does hereby designate and appoint _____________ as its Director to the Orange County Fire Authority Board of Directors.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of December, 2022. __________________________
Ross Chun
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:

__________________________ __________________________
Scott C. Smith, City Attorney Mitzi Ortiz, MMC, City Clerk 89