1 AGENDA
ALISO VIEJO CITY COUNCIL
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 2025
7:00 PM REGULAR MEETING
CITY HALL
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
12 JOURNEY
ALISO VIEJO, CA
Mayor Tiffany Ackley
Mayor Pro Tem Max Duncan
Councilmember Richard Hurt
Councilmember Mike Munzing
Councilmember Tim Zandbergen
WELCOME to the City of Aliso Viejo City Council meeting. Those persons wishing to address the City Council are requested to complete and submit to the City Clerk a “Request to Address City Council” form available at the entrance to the City Council Chamber s. Speakers will be called at the appropriate time as their interested matter is heard. COMMENTS WILL BE LIMITED TO THREE MINUTES PER SPEAKER. Council proceedings are recorded.
It is the City's intention to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) . If you need special assistance to participate in the meeting, the City will make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility and/or accommodations. [28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title II] Please contact the City Clerk's Office at (949) 425-2505 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting.
Regular meetings of the City Council are held on the first and third Wednesday of the month at the City Hall Council Chambers, 12 Journey, Aliso Viejo. Copies of the agenda are available in the lobby at City Hall on the Thursday preceding a regularly scheduled City Council meeting. All communications received by the City regarding an agenda item have been included in the agenda materials. Supplemental documents relating to specific agenda items, including communications received after agenda delivery, are presented at the dais and in the Public Copy agenda binder at the time of the meeting. Supplemental documents are also available for review in the City Clerk's office, 12 Journey, Aliso Viejo. For more information, please contact City Hall at (949) 425- 2505.
This meeting will be broadcast live on Cox Communications Channel 851, AT&T U -Verse Channel 99 and the City's website. By attending the City Council Meeting, you are giving your permission to be televised. The Council Meetings are rebroadcast on Wednesday at 7:00 p.m. on Cox Communications Channel 851, AT&T U -Verse Channel 99, and can be viewed on the internet at www.avcity.org.
MITZI ORTIZ SCOTT C. SMITH JANET MARTINEZ
CITY MANAGER CITY ATTORNEY CITY CLERK
1 2
PLEASE SILENCE ALL CELL PHONES AND OTHER
ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT WHILE CITY COUNCIL IS IN SESSION
CALL TO ORDER: Regular Meeting
ROLL CALL
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION:
1. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS:
1.1 PRESENTATION BY THE ORANGE COUNTY MOSQUITO AND VECTOR CONTROL
DISTRICT
2. ADDITIONS, DELETIONS, REORDERING TO THE AGENDA:
3. COMMUNITY INPUT:
Members of the public wishing to address the City Council are requested to complete and submit to the City Clerk a "Request to Address City Council" form available at the entrance to the City Council Chambers. In compliance with the Brown Act, no discussion or action may be taken on comments received at this time, except the City Council may briefly respond to statements made or questions posed. Comments are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker.
4. CONSENT CALENDAR:
All matters listed on the Consent Calendar will be acted upon by one vote unless members of the City Council, or staff request a matter to be discussed and/or removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. Items removed from the Consent Calendar wi ll be discussed and voted upon immediately following City Council action on the remainder of the Consent Calendar.
4.1 WAIVE THE READING OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Recommended Action: Approve the reading by title only of all ordinances and resolutions wherein the titles appear on the public agenda; said titles shall be determined to have been read by title, and further reading is waived.
4.2 APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Recommended Action: Approve the Minutes as submitted for the January 15, 2025, Regular Meeting.
Draft Minutes - January 15, 2025 Regular Meeting
4.3 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
Recommended Action: Ratify accounts payable checks and electronic funds transfers issued between December 20, 2024, and January 16, 2025, in the amount of $1,681,919.55.
Staff Report
Attachment - Accounts Payable Report
2 3
4.4 TREASURER’S STATEMENT – DECEMBER 2024
Recommended Action: Receive and file the December 2024 Treasurer’s Statement.
Staff Report
Attachment - December 2024 Treasurer’s Statement
4.5 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH STC TRAFFIC, INC. TO PROVIDE
TRAFFIC STUDY PEER REVIEW SERVICES
Recommended Action: Approve and authorize the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with STC Traffic, Inc. for traffic study peer review consulting services.
Staff Report
Attachment 1 - Agreement
4.6 STATUS UPDATE ON DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NEGOTIATIONS Recommended Action: Receive and file.
Staff Report
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
5.1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A 748 SQUARE FOOT ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT WITH A 668 SQUARE FOOT ATTACHED GARAGE THAT EXCEEDS THE HEIGHT LIMIT OF 25’ (27’ PROPOSED) AT 25 ALISAL COURT (USE- 2024-00012).
Recommended Action: Adopt a Resolution approving a Conditional Use Permit to construct a 748 square foot accessory dwelling unit with a 668 square foot attached garage that exceeds the height limit of 25 feet (27 feet proposed) at 25 Alisal Court (USE-2024-00012).
Staff Report
Attachment 1 - Resolution
Attachment 2 - Proposed Plans
Attachment 3 - Applicant's Letter
Attachment 3.1 - Letter from AVCA.pdf
Attachment 4 - Presentation
6. DISCUSSION:
6.1 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT AND CONDITION ANALYSIS
Recommended Action: Receive Staff presentation.
Staff Report
Attachment 1 - Presentation
Attachment 2 - Phase I Pavement Report.pdf
Attachment 3 - Phase II Pavement Report.pdf
6.2 BIKE LANE DISCUSSION
Recommended Action: Receive presentation and provide direction to Staff.
Staff Report
Attachment 1 - Bike Lane Map
Attachment 2 - Presentation
3 4
6.3 AGREEMENT WITH GFIVE ENTERPRISES INC. DBA ADVANCED POOL
SPECIALISTS FOR THE AQUATIC CENTER POOL DECK SURFACE
REHABILITATION PROJECT
Recommended Action:
1. Approve Contract Documents, Specifications, and Plans for Aquatic Center Pool Deck Rehabilitation Project;
2. Award an agreement in the amount of $238,312.00 to GFive Enterprises Inc. dba Advanced Pool Specialists for Aquatic Center Pool Deck Surface Rehabilitation Project;
3. Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with GFive Enterprises Inc. dba Advanced Pool Specialists;
4. Authorize City staff to make total compensation to GFive Enterprises Inc. dba Advanced Pool Specialists up to $238,312.00 plus $23,831.20 (10% of the agreement amount) to allow for contingencies, totaling 262,143.20; and
5. Declare this project categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) process Per Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Chapter 3, Article 19, Section 15301 (Class 1: Existing Facilities).
Staff Report
Attachment 1 - Agreement
7. CITY MANAGER' S REPORT:
8. ANNOUNCEMENTS / COUNCIL COMMENTS / COMMITTEE UPDATES:
9. ADJOURNMENT:
The next regularly scheduled City Council meeting is February 19, 2025.
4
Regular Meeting Minutes
CITY OF ALISO VIEJO
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING
JANUARY 15, 2025, 7:00 PM
Council Chambers, City Hall, 12 Journey
Aliso Viejo, California
CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Ackley called the Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Aliso Viejo to order at 7:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: MAYOR TIFFANY ACKLEY
MAYOR PRO TEM MAX DUNCAN
COUNCILMEMBER RICHARD W. HURT
COUNCILMEMBER MIKE MUNZING
COUNCILMEMBER TIM A. ZANDBERGEN
ABSENT: NONE
STAFF PRESENT: MITZI ORTIZ, CITY MANAGER
HONGDAO NGUYEN, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
JANET MARTINEZ, CITY CLERK
ANN EIFERT, FINANCIAL SERVICES DIRECTOR
SHAUN PELLETIER, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
SO KIM, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
ROSE RIVERA, SENIOR PLANNER
LIZZY MENDOZA, RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES MANAGER
ISAAC AZIZ, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MANAGER
CAPT. RYAN BUHR, CHIEF OF POLICE SERVICES
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: City Clerk Janet Martinez led the pledge of allegiance.
1. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS:
1.1 RECOGNITION OF ALISO VIEJO LITTLE LEAGUE - 10 & 12 YEAR OLD ALL STARS DISTRICT 55 & SECTION 10 CHAMPIONS
Mayor Ackley presented the certificates of recognition to 10-Year-Old All-Stars Team Manager Jeff Perkins, who commented on the team’s accomplishments.
Mayor Ackley presented the certificates of recognition to 12-Year-Old All-Stars Team Manager Ryan Johnson, who commented on the team’s accomplishments. 5
Regular Meeting Minutes
1.2 RECOGNITION OF 2024 MAYOR MIKE MUNZING
Mayor Ackley presented the recognition to Councilmember Munzing. Janelle Atienza, Field Representative for Assemblymember Dinae Dixon presented a certificate of recognition. Councilmember Munzing expressed his appreciation to City staff, Council colleagues, and residents.
1.3 INTRODUCTION OF CITY CLERK JANET MARTINEZ
Mayor Ackley introduced City Clerk Janet Martinez. City Manager Mitzi Ortiz provided additional comments. City Clerk Janet Martinez expressed her appreciation for the welcome.
1.4 INTRODUCTION OF CHIEF OF POLICE SERVICES CAPTAIN RYAN BUHR Mayor Ackley introduced Chief of Police Services Captain Ryan Buhr. City Manager Mitzi Ortiz provided additional comments. Chief of Police Services Captain Ryan Buhr expressed his appreciation for the welcome.
2. ADDITIONS, DELETIONS, REORDERING TO THE AGENDA:
None.
3. COMMUNITY INPUT:
1. Finn Sullivan commented on a donation drive benefitting Los Angeles fire victims.
4. CONSENT CALENDAR:
Unless otherwise indicated below, the following pertains to all items on the Consent Calendar.
Motion: Councilmember Hurt moved and Councilmember Munzing seconded to approve the recommended actions. Motion carried 5-0.
4.1 WAIVE THE READING OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Recommended Action: Approve the reading by title only of all ordinances and resolutions wherein the titles appear on the public agenda; said titles shall be determined to have been read by title, and further reading is waived.
4.2 APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Recommended Action: Approve the Minutes as submitted for the December 4, 2024 Regular Meeting.
6
Regular Meeting Minutes
4.3 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
Recommended Action: Ratify accounts payable checks and electronic funds transfers issued between November 22, 2024, and December 19, 2024, in the amount of $1,998,474.57.
4.4 TREASURER’S STATEMENT – NOVEMBER 2024
Recommended Action: Receive and file the November 2024 Treasurer’s Statement.
4.5 MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN CITY OF ALISO VIEJO, CITY
OF LAGUNA HILLS, CITY OF LAKE FOREST, CITY OF MISSION VIEJO, AND CITY
OF LAGUNA NIGUEL FOR SHARING OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
RESOURCES
Recommended Action: Authorize the City Manager to execute the Memorandum of Agreement by and between the City of Aliso Viejo, City of Laguna Hills, City of Lake Forest, City of Mission Viejo, and City of Laguna Niguel for sharing of emergency management resources.
4.6 AGREEMENT WITH TROY AND BANKS, INC. FOR COST REDUCTION
CONSULTING SERVICES
Recommended Action:
1. Approve an agreement with Troy and Banks, Inc. for cost reduction consulting services; and
2. Authorize the City Manager to execute a professional services agreement with Troy and Banks, Inc. in the amount not-to-exceed $49,999 through June 30, 2026.
4.7 AUTHORIZE THE RENEWAL OF ARCTIC WOLF MANAGED DETECTION AND
RESPONSE CYBERSECURITY SOLUTION
Recommended Action:
1. Approve and authorize the City Manager to issue a purchase order to RedNight Consulting Inc., authorized reseller of Artic Wolf, Inc., in the amount of $34,996.45 for Fiscal Year 2024-25 for the renewal of cloud-based cybersecurity event log aggregation, threat detection and response, and Security Operations Center services; and
2. Authorize the City Manager to administratively approve up to two additional renewals of the purchase order on the same terms with an annual increase not-to-exceed 3% per year for Fiscal Years 2025-26 through 2026-27.
4.8 FIRST AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. FOR THE CITY’S PERMITTING SOFTWARE
7
Regular Meeting Minutes
Recommended Action: Approve and authorize the City Manager to execute a First Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Tyler Technologies, Inc. for the City’s permitting software to increase the total compensation by $73,352.
4.9 SPECIAL EVENT SPONSORSHIP PROGRAM
City Manager Mitzi Ortiz responded to questions regarding advertising.
Recommended Action: Approve and authorize the proposed Special Event Sponsorship Policy and Procedures.
Motion: Councilmember Hurt moved and Councilmember Munzing seconded to approve the recommended actions. Motion carried 5-0.
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
5.1 CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW FOR A RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY AT 26800-26970
ALISO VIEJO PARKWAY
City Manager Mitzi Ortiz introduced Community Development Director So Kim, who provided an overview. Staff and the applicant responded to questions regarding proposed garage sizes, parking, traffic impacts, unit layouts, sales model of duplex units, EV charging stations, gas or electric utilities, estimated construction timeline, and estimated price range of units. Mayor Ackley opened the public hearing and the following provided comment:
1. Alp Kalaycioglu expressed concerns about the project
2. Matt Young with Glaukos expressed concerns about the project.
3. Jeff Merritt expressed support for the project.
4. Art Camoia expressed concerns about the project.
5. Kevin A. expressed opposition to the project.
There were no other comments. Mayor Ackley closed the public hearing.
5.2 CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW FOR A TOWNHOME COMMUNITY AT 400-700
FREEDOM LANE
City Manager Mitzi Ortiz introduced Senior Planner Rose Rivera, who provided an overview. Staff and the applicant responded to questions regarding garage sizes, unit layouts, parking, gas or electric utilities, affordable units, estimated price ranges, traffic impacts, density bonus, amenities, noise mitigation, and ventilation requirements.
Mayor Ackley opened the public hearing and there were no requests to speak. Mayor Ackley closed the public hearing.
6. DISCUSSION:
None.
8
Regular Meeting Minutes
7. CITY MANAGER' S REPORT:
City Manager Mitzi Ortiz commented on disaster preparedness resources available on the City’s website; announced winter registration for recreation classes; and announced the Aliso Viejo Rental Showcase to be held on January 26, 2025, from 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. at Aliso Viejo Ranch.
8. ANNOUNCEMENTS / COUNCIL COMMENTS / COMMITTEE UPDATES:
Councilmember Munzing:
Expressed enthusiasm for the new year ahead
Offered wishes for a safe recovery to OCSD Deputy Clara Dossland Wished a happy birthday to Mayor Pro Tem Duncan and Councilmember Zandbergen Councilmember Zandbergen:
Attended All is Bright Celebration and Tree Lighting Ceremony Attended Boys & Girls Club holiday events
Councilmember Hurt:
Attended SJHTCA Board meeting
Shared information about phishing scam affecting FasTrak customers Commended Aliso Viejo businesses on raising funds for fire victims Mayor Pro Tem Duncan:
Commented on recent wildfires
Expressed gratitude for the opportunity to serve as Mayor Pro Tem Congratulated Mayor Ackley on being appointed as Mayor Welcomed Councilmember Zandbergen to the City Council Complimented OCSD Deputy Aaron Barragan for work with local e-bike riders Obtained consensus to consider amendment to City’s e-bike ordinance Mayor Ackley:
Wished a happy birthday to Councilmember Hurt
Expressed enthusiasm for the new year ahead
Asked Councilmember Hurt to adjourn the meeting
9. ADJOURNMENT: Councilmember Hurt adjourned the meeting in memory of resident Joe Brooks at 9:26 p.m. to the regularly scheduled City Council meeting of February 5, 2025.
Respectfully submitted: Approved by:
________________________ ________________________
JANET MARTINEZ TIFFANY ACKLEY
CITY CLERK MAYOR
9 City of Aliso Viejo
AGENDA ITEM
DATE: February 5, 2025
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Ann Eifert, Director of Financial Services
SUBJECT: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
Recommended Action:
Ratify accounts payable checks and electronic funds transfers issued between December 20, 2024, and January 16, 2025, in the amount of $1,681,919.55.
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditures in the amount of $1,681,919.55.
Background:
The City issues accounts payable checks on a bi-weekly basis and presents it to City Council for ratification at its next regularly scheduled City Council meeting.
Discussion:
The attached registers containing checks and electronic funds transfers issued between December 20, 2024, and January 16, 2025, for $1,681,919.55, are being presented for ratification. All payments have been made in compliance with the City’s purchasing policy and procedures. Payments have been reviewed and approved by the appropriate departmental staff. The issued accounts payable checks and electronic funds transfers have been reviewed and deemed in accordance with the fiscal year budget by the Director of Financial Services.
Attachment:
1. Accounts Payable Report
10 Accounts Payable
Description (Item)Vendor Name Amount
101 - GENERAL FUND
DEC'24 BBK CELLULARBEST BEST & KRIEGER 1,332.50
DEC'24 BBK CEQA & ENVIRONMENTAL (SPECIALIZED)BEST BEST & KRIEGER 32.50 DEC'24 BBK MAJOR GENERAL PLAN UPDATEBEST BEST & KRIEGER 867.00 DEC'24 BBK APPLICANT INITIATED REIMB (AIR)BEST BEST & KRIEGER 1,760.10 FEB'25 VISION - DDCHOICE BUILDER 24.19
FEB'25 DENTAL - DDCHOICE BUILDER 145.88
FEB'25 DENTAL - RCCHOICE BUILDER (145.88)
FEB'25 VISION - RCCHOICE BUILDER (24.19)
FEB'25 DENTAL INSURANCECHOICE BUILDER 1,830.38
FEB'25 DENTAL - RHCHOICE BUILDER 96.90
FEB'25 VISION - RHCHOICE BUILDER 15.03
FEB'25 VISION INSURANCECHOICE BUILDER 283.36
CEQA PROFESSIONAL SERVICESDE NOVO PLANNING GROUP 2,135.00 NOV'24 CAA - ST. MARY'S GRADING - S.WILSONCHARLES ABBOTT ASSOC INC 47.50 NOV'24 CAA - KAISER GRADING - S.WILSONCHARLES ABBOTT ASSOC INC 47.50 NOV'24 TRAFFIC CONSULTANT SERVICESSTC TRAFFIC, INC 2,780.00 NOV'24 TRAFFIC CONSULTANT SERVICESSTC TRAFFIC, INC 4,425.00 SAPP-2024-00017_11 DUNLIN LN_SUNRUN CANCELLEDSUNRUN INSTALLATION SERVICES 153.50 SAPP-2024-00017_11 DUNLIN LN_SUNRUN CANCELLEDSUNRUN INSTALLATION SERVICES 43.03 SAPP-2024-00025_28 TANGLEWOOD_SUNRUN CANCELLEDSUNRUN INSTALLATION SERVICES 153.50 SAPP-2024-00025_28 TANGLEWOOD_SUNRUN CANCELLEDSUNRUN INSTALLATION SERVICES 43.03 JAN'25 CALPERS HEALTH PREMIUMCALPERS HEALTH 28,430.42
SW COMPUTER LOAN AGREEMENTSUSAN WILSON 961.05
NOV'24 LANDSCAPE PLAN REVIEW - 95 ARGONAUTRJM DESIGN GROUP INC 877.50 NOV'24 LANDSCAPE PLAN REVIEW - 400-700 FREEDOM LNRJM DESIGN GROUP INC 780.00 CEQA PROFESSIONAL SERVICESDE NOVO PLANNING GROUP 4,694.00 ENG2243_GLAUKOSGLAUKOS CORPORATION (2,337.39)
ENG2244_GLAUKOSGLAUKOS CORPORATION 1,535.66
ENG2242_GLAUKOSGLAUKOS CORPORATION 17,302.30
CD-2024-00107_2 AMBER_HOYT ROOFSHOYT ROOFS 500.00
68,789.37
CITY COUNCIL
RH 10/16-10/18/24 CALCITIES CONF-T&E REIMBURSEMENTRICHARD HURT III 179.29 01/06 - MM - COUNCIL PORTRAITSIMONSON PHOTOGRAPHY, INC 382.51 DL 11/26 LOCC - MAYORS & COUNCILMEMBERS ACAD TIM ZUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 675.00 11/17/24-12/16/24 CITY COUNCIL PHONE LINESAT&T 237.43
DL 10/22 LAKE FOREST FLORAL - VETERANS DAY WREATHUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 420.56 CITY COUNCIL TOTAL: 1,894.79
CITY MANAGER
DL 12/02 CITYBREA-OCCMA LUNCHEON-MO DL SP AE IA LMUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 390.00 DL 11/27 ICSC - MEMBERSHIP MOUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 125.00 JAN'25 PG - HEALTH PREMIUMCALPERS HEALTH 158.00
11/17/24-12/16/24 CITY MANAGER PHONEAT&T 45.47
11/17/24-12/16/24 HR PHONEAT&T 50.51
CITY MANAGER TOTAL: 768.98
HUMAN RESOURCES
11/20 CITY CLERK BACKGROUND CHECKSMARTHIRE, A DIVISION OF KROUT & SCHNEIDER, INC 92.00 DL 11/05 PAVILIONS-WVPP TRAINING-SNACKS/DRINKS*US BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 197.75 DL 11/04 STARBUCKS - INTERVIEW PANELUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 28.20 FEB'25 EAP PROGRAMHEALTH AND HUMAN RESOURCE CENTER INC 102.90 PC 10/30 TOWN&COUNTRY-PERS ED FORUM-HOTELUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 609.00 PC 10/29 TOWN&COUNTRY-PERS ED FORUM-MEALUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 22.32 PC 11/20 URBANE CAFE-TRAINING LUNCHUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 366.79 PC 10/28 TOWN&COUNTRY-PERS ED FORUM-MEALUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 45.87 PC 11/20 OPAH-REC SPEC PANEL LUNCHUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 142.53 11 Description (Item)Vendor Name Amount
PC 11/13 STARBUCKS-CLERK INTERVIEWUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 12.20 PC 11/14 STARBUCKS-CLERK INTERVIEWUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 5.25 PC 11/14 STARBUCKS-CLERK INTERVIEWUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 12.00 PC 11/05 WEBBS-CLERK PANEL LUNCHUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 130.68 PC 11/26 TARGET - GC FOR OCHRC LUNCHEON RAFFLEUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 25.00 HUMAN RESOURCES TOTAL: 1,792.49
CITY CLERK
REF0011706537 - 12/12 NIB AQUATIC CTR POOL REHABCALIFORNIA NEWSPAPERS PARTNERSHIP 468.59 FY24-25 CITY CLERK-OFFICE SUPPLIESSTAPLES ADVANTAGE 271.91 MO 12/11-12/13/24 LOCC NEW LAW CONF REIMBMITZI ORTIZ 1,173.91 CITY CLERK TOTAL: 1,914.41
CITY ATTORNEY
DEC'24 BBK GENERAL RETAINER LEGAL SERVICESBEST BEST & KRIEGER 24,150.00 DEC'24 BBK LABOR/BENEFITSBEST BEST & KRIEGER 97.50
DEC'24 NPDES NEW PERMIT (NON-RETAINER)BEST BEST & KRIEGER 737.70 CITY ATTORNEY TOTAL: 24,985.20
FINANCE
FEB'25 ADMIN FEECHOICE BUILDER 30.00
NOV'24 PARS REP FEESPARS (PHASE II SYSTEMS AND CALIFORNIA CORPORATION) 300.00 AE 11/27 GFOA ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP - M. MARTINEZUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 150.00 JAN'25 CALPERS ADMIN FEECALPERS HEALTH 74.38
2024 AVPC TAX FILINGS FY 23-24DAVIS FARR LLP 437.50
DEC'24 FIN OFFICE SUPPLIESSTAPLES ADVANTAGE 20.03
FINANCE TOTAL: 1,011.91
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
JAN'25 NETWORK SUPPORT & SECURITYNEXUS IS INC 416.67
DEC'24 ENERGOV & GISJOSE RUEL FABELLA DIRA 1,500.00
IA 11/28 EOC YOUTUBE SUBSCRUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 72.99 IA 12/07 GODADDY - DOMAIN RENEWALUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 55.16 IA 12/16 WAITWHILE SUBSCRIPTIONUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 196.00 IA 12/19 STAPLES - POWER BANK AND MICEUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 183.14 IA 12/11 AT&T - COUNCIL MEMBER PHONE CASEUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 75.43 IA 12/05 STAPLES - KEYBOARDSUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 75.41 IA 11/27 BLUEBEAM SUB - PLNG PROJ MARKUPSUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 2,340.00 IA 12/19 GODADDY-ALISOVIEJOFAMILYRESOURCCENTER.COMUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 45.34 IA 12/21 GODADDY - ALISOVIEJOAQUATICCENTERUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 22.17 IA 11/30 DIGITAL RIVER STELLAR - DATA RECOVERYUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 299.00 12/23/24-01/22/25 CH O365 LICENSING AND SUPPORTTANGENT COMPUTERS INC 2,976.70 JAN'25 OFFSITE BACKUP STORAGELUNAVI, INC 604.25
11/22/24-12/21/24 CH-ALARM/POTS LINEAT&T 3,789.29
JAN'25 ACCT#0202 CH CABLE TVCOX COMMUNICATIONS, INC 206.73 JAN'25 ACCT#8802 CH INTERNET - FIBER (600MB)COX COMMUNICATIONS, INC 1,500.00 JAN'25 ACCT#9302 LAB INTERNETCOX COMMUNICATIONS, INC 85.39 DEC'24-DEC'25 GOTOMEETING BUSINESSGOTO TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC 780.00 11/17/24-12/16/24 FLEET COMPLETE GPSAT&T 202.32
11/17/24-12/16/24 EOC MIFIAT&T 160.96
11/17/24-12/16/24 CITY HALL MIFIAT&T 123.72
11/17/24-12/16/24 EOC PHONES LINESAT&T 110.03
JAN'25 CH GOTO VOIP SERVICE & SUPPORTGOTO COMMUNICATIONS 1,999.94 LAPTOP REIMBURSEMENT - TZTIM ZANDBERGEN 1,650.00
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TOTAL: 19,470.64
NON-DEPARTMENTAL
JAN'25 - RECORDS OFF SITE STORAGECERTIFIED RECORDS MANAGEMENT 449.73 JAN'24 C5300S COPY ROOM LEASE (2624) - PRINCIPALRICOH USA 617.99 JAN'24 C5300S COPY ROOM LEASE (2624) - INTERESTRICOH USA 76.21 DEC'24 VISTA PARK TREE TRIMMINGGREAT SCOTT TREE SERVICE, INC 3,374.00 DEC'24 AMAZON-AWARDS FOR HOLIDAY LUNCHEONAMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES INC 16.15 DEC'24 AMAZON-HOLIDAY CANDY FOR HOLIDAY LUNCHEONAMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES INC 37.61 DEC'24 AMAZON-TABLE COVERS FOR HOLIDAY LUNCHEONAMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES INC 25.19 PLATES & BADGES-MARTINEZ & COUNCILJ&M TROPHIES INC 101.35 JAN'25 VP LIGHTING PARTSCONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS, INC 483.42 DEC'24 RICOH 2504EX FRONT COUNTER PRINTS (4456)RICOH USA 71.87 JAN'25 RICOH RSI CLOUD SUBSCRIPTION (SW1860708)RICOH USA 24.31 12 Description (Item)Vendor Name Amount
JAN'25 CH & STE 200 FIRST AID MAINT. & SUPPLIESCINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 290.81 DEC'24 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE VISTA PARKNIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 1,064.97 AE 12/02 HARBOR STATION HOA DUES-DEC'24 89 PLAYAUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 191.01 DEC'24-2.37 HRS-PUBLIC INFORMATIONKYRSTI NICOLE ASHMALL 213.30 DL 12/05 BRUEGGER'S BAGELS - J MARTINEZ WELCOMEUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 65.71 EM 12/12 TRADER JOE'S - HOLIDAY LUNCHEON SUPPLIESUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 50.00 EM 12/19 BAGELS & BREW-HOLIDAY LUNCHEON - REFUNDUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM (1,979.04) EM 12/12 TRADER JOE'S - HOLIDAY LUNCHEON SUPPLIESUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 72.06 EM 12/11 SMART AND FINAL-HOLIDAY LUNCHEON SUPPLIESUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 87.57 EM 12/17 COSTCO - HOLIDAY LUNCHEON SUPPLIESUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 117.82 EM 12/12 TARGET-HOLIDAY LUNCHEON SUPPLIES & PRIZESUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 140.00 EM 12/03 COSTCO - STAFF HOLIDAY LUNCHEON SUPPLIESUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 125.91 EM 12/19 BAGELS & BREW-HOLIDAY LUNCHEON UPD PRICEUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 1,830.97 EM 12/18 BAGELS & BREW-HOLIDAY LUNCHEON CATERINGUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 1,979.04 JAN'25 REMOVAL OF BANNERS - HOLIDAYVIGICABI INC 1,449.00 JB 12/10 COSTCO - HOLIDAY LUNCHEONUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 38.76 2025 MUSIC LICENSE FEESESAC RIGHTS MANAGEMENT INC 1,982.00 12/04/24-01/04/25 MTR#13016735 89 PLAYA CIR GASTHE GAS COMPANY 1.76 DEC'24 ACCT#2427 89 PLAYA CIR ELECTRICITYSO CAL EDISON 48.77 DL 10/29 AMAZON-HALLOWEEN LUNCHEON GIFTCARDSUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 40.00 DL 10/26 AMAZON-HALLOWEEN LUNCHEON SUPPLIESUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 51.53 DL 10/29 SMART&FINAL-HALLOWEEN ACTIVITY SUPPLIESUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 60.46 DL 10/30 SMART&FINAL-HALLOWEEN LUNCHEON SUPPLIESUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 81.79 DL 10/30 TARGET-HALLOWEEN LUNCHEON GIFTCARDSUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 25.00 DL 10/31 BAGELS&BREW-HALLOWEEN LUNCHEON CATERINGUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 931.97 DL 10/30 TARGET-HALLOWEEN ACTIVITY SUPPLIESUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 53.60 JNL 12/21 HOBBY LOBBY - HOLIDAY PARTY BRAG BOARDUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 1.72 MO 12/14 CANVA SUBSCRIPTIONUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 119.99 ACCT#64101 VISTA WATER SVCMOULTON NIGUEL WATER DIST 679.99 PC 10/26 AMAZON-LUNCHEON ACTIVITY-BALLOON TAPEUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 24.77 PC 11/18 RALPHS-CC DINNER DRINKSUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 54.87 PC 10/26 AMAZON-LUNCHEON ACTIVITY-BALLOONSUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 62.38 PC 11/14 PLUMERIA CAFE-LUNCHEON ACTIVITY WINNERSUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 125.51 NON-DEPARTMENTAL TOTAL: 15,361.83
C. S. ADMINISTRATION
DEC'24 SMP R&CS CONTRIBUTIONCABCO YELLOW INC 636.00
DEC'24 AMAZON-2 NEW NET LIGHTS FOR TREE LIGHTINGAMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES INC 62.48 DEC'24 AMAZON-NEW UPLIGHTS FOR TREE LIGHTINGAMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES INC 198.20 DEC'24 AMAZON-GREEN ZIP TIES FOR TREE LIGHTINGAMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES INC 9.64 DEC'24 AMAZON-CHRISTMAS SQUISHY TOY GIVEAWAYS CWCAMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES INC 13.95 DEC'24 AMAZON-BLACK CABLE TIES FOR TREE LIGHTINGAMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES INC 18.31 DEC'24 AMAZON-CHRISTMAS FIDGET TOY GIVEAWAYS CWCAMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES INC 20.46 DEC'24 AMAZON-CHRISTMAS TABLE COVERS CWCAMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES INC 28.00 WINTER 2025 BROCHURE 32 PAGE SELF COVERADVANTAGE MAILING, LLC 12,792.55 TREE LIGHTING 2024 PHOTOGRAPHYERIC WINTER 600.00
EM 12/06 STADIUM BREW - TREE LIGHTING STAFF MEALUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 383.40 JB 12/17 TARGET - HOLIDAY SUPPLIESUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 29.31 JB 11/26 COSTCO - PLASTIC GAME CUPS CWCUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 26.92 JB 12/04 DOLLAR TREE - PLASTIC GAME CUPS CWCUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 5.39 JB 12/19 TARGET - HOLIDAY SUPPLIES- RETURNUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM (10.77) JB 12/02 WALMART - BATTERIESUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 35.46 JB 11/26 COSTCO-CLEANING/BREAKROOM SUPPLIESUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 164.67 JAN'25 HW - HEALTH PREMIUMCALPERS HEALTH 158.00
JAN'25 DP - HEALTH PREMIUMCALPERS HEALTH 158.00
NOV'24 SMP FUND R&CS CONTRIB TRANSPORTATIONCABCO YELLOW INC 708.00 2024 AV HOLIDAY TREE - REMOVAL SERVICEJONES FOREST PRODUCTS LLC 3,000.00 JNL 12/11 SMART AND FINAL - CWTC EVENT SUPPLIESUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 10.96 JNL 12/16 SMART AND FINAL - CWTC SUPPLIES RETURNEDUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM (9.99) JNL 12/17 RALPHS - CWTC EVENT SUPPLIESUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 2.29 JNL 12/12 SMART AND FINAL - CWTC EVENT SUPPLIESUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 29.97 C. S. ADMINISTRATION TOTAL: 19,071.20
IGLESIA PARK
NOV'24 PVM IGLESIA PARK MAINTENANCEPV MAINTENANCE INC 971.14 DEC'24 PVM IGLESIA PARK MAINTENANCEPV MAINTENANCE INC 858.00 13 Description (Item)Vendor Name Amount
DEC'24 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE IGLESIA PARKNIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 7,085.61 DEC'24 ACCT#7997 IGLESIA PARK ELECTRICITYSO CAL EDISON 337.77 8/08/24-12/09/24 MTR#4114 IGLESIA PARK WATEREL TORO WATER DISTRICT 3,213.25 8/08/24-12/09/24 MTR#3499 IGLESIA PARK WATEREL TORO WATER DISTRICT 3,539.95 IGLESIA PARK TOTAL: 16,005.72
IGLESIA BUILDING
JAN'25 IGLESIA ACCESS CONTROLSONITROL ORANGE COUNTY LLC 109.39 DEC'24 ACCT#7997 IGLESIA BLDG ELECTRICITYSO CAL EDISON 1,114.43 8/08/24-12/09/24 MTR#5016 IGLESIA PARK BLDG WATEREL TORO WATER DISTRICT 1,056.29 IGLESIA BUILDING TOTAL: 2,280.11
IGLESIA PARK COMMUNITY CENTER
NOV'24 ELEMENTARY & TEEN KEYSTONE PROGRAMBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CAPISTRANO VALLEY 15,000.00 OCT'24 ELEMENTARY & TEEN KEYSTONE PROGRAMBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CAPISTRANO VALLEY 15,000.00 IGLESIA PARK COMMUNITY CENTER TOTAL: 30,000.00
PLANNING
JAN'25 MF - HEALTH PREMIUMCALPERS HEALTH 158.00
DEC'24 SAFETY ELEMENT UPDATEATLAS PLANNING SOLUTIONS 1,400.00 DEC'24 AFFORD. HOUSING CONSULTANT SERVICESREBECCA J CAHA 1,425.00 PLANNING TOTAL: 2,983.00
BUILDING
DEC'24 CAA CONTRACT SERVICES - BUILDING SERVICESCHARLES ABBOTT ASSOC INC 95,638.69 NOV'24 CAA CONTRACT SERVICES - BUILDING SERVICESCHARLES ABBOTT ASSOC INC 36,177.62 BUILDING TOTAL: 131,816.31
CODE ENFORCEMENT
JAN'24 SIDEWALK VENDING TASKFORCEPV MAINTENANCE INC 1,582.00 DEC'24 CAA CONTRACT SERVICES - CODE ENFORCEMENTCHARLES ABBOTT ASSOC INC 5,270.00 NOV'24 CAA CONTRACT SERVICES - CODE ENFORCEMENTCHARLES ABBOTT ASSOC INC 8,500.00 SK 12/03 EXTRA SPACE STORAGE-CONFISCATED TACO STANUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 631.20 CODE ENFORCEMENT TOTAL: 15,983.20
ENGINEERING (GENERAL)
JAN'25 PVM WAREHOUSE LEASEPV MAINTENANCE INC 1,035.00
DEC'24 LANDSCAPE INSPECTION SERVICESRICHARD FISHER ASSOCIATES 3,996.23 NOV'24 CAA - NPDESCHARLES ABBOTT ASSOC INC 9,586.25
NOV'24 CAA - SOLID WASTECHARLES ABBOTT ASSOC INC 3,122.50 JAN'25 MURCAL IOT SMARTCOMMAND MONITORING SERVICEMURPHY SWITCH OF CA 450.00 11/17/24-12/16/24 PUBLIC WORKS TABLETSAT&T 120.72
10/17/24 H20 FOR HOAS EVENT - AV CITY CONTRIBUTIONMOULTON NIGUEL WATER DIST 423.03 FY24-25 NPDES COST SHARE AGMT #D02-048COUNTY OF ORANGE 109,894.87 SP 12/03 ASCE MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 2025US BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 321.00 ENGINEERING (GENERAL) TOTAL: 128,949.60
STREET MAINTENANCE
DEC'24 PVM STREET MAINTENANCE MOE TAXPV MAINTENANCE INC 20,884.08 STREET MAINTENANCE TOTAL: 20,884.08
LAW ENFORCEMENT-CONTRACT
JAN'25 LAW ENFORCEMENT/BODY CAMERAS/IN CAR VIDEOCOUNTY OF ORANGE 892,517.60 LAW ENFORCEMENT-CONTRACT TOTAL: 892,517.60
LAW ENFORCEMENT-OTHER
NOV'24 POLICE SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIESSTAPLES ADVANTAGE 963.43 DEC'24 POLICE SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIESSTAPLES ADVANTAGE 46.79 12/08-12/21/24 413.11 HRS-CROSSING GUARD SERVICESALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES 13,847.45 AV 11/28 CSG NEMA - NAT'L EMERGENCY MGT ASSOCUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 187.50 AV 11/27 IACP -INTERNATIONAL ASSOC CHIEF OF POLICEUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 220.00 AV 12/05 WEBB'S GRAINWORKS-MEETING AV CITY STAFFUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 94.78 RD 11/22 CHEVRON - CAR WASH FOR UNIT 2716US BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 29.99 RD 12/13 THE TOLL ROADSUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 575.00 RD 12/19 RENAISSANCE CLUBSPORT - STAFF MEETINGUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 464.19 RD 11/30 TARGET - CANDY CANES TREE LIGHTING EVENTUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 24.10 RD 12/06 JM TROPHIES - BRASS NAME PLATE FOR PLAQUEUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 21.50 RD 11/29 RALPHS - WATER TREE LIGHTING EVENTUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 52.01 RD12/10 SOUTH COASTTROPHY- STAFFBEVERAGE CONTAINEFUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 1,031.17 RD 12/05 SGT PEPPERERONIS-FOOD TREE LIGHTING EVENTUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 142.23 11/17/24-12/16/24 PALS PHONE LINEAT&T 45.47
14 Description (Item)Vendor Name Amount
11/24-12/07/24 229.38 HRS-CROSSING GUARD SERVICESALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES 7,688.82 LAW ENFORCEMENT-OTHER TOTAL: 25,434.43
EOC
DL 12/14 EXTRA SPACE - OFFSITE UNIT #A1554US BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 290.00 DEC'24 EOP UPDATEATLAS PLANNING SOLUTIONS 1,605.00
ALL HAZARDS READY GUIDE SPANISHCLAUDINE JAENICHEN 3,275.00 DL 11/14 LIFE STORAGE - OFFSITE UNIT #A1554US BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 290.00 SL 12/18 TERRA MIA PIZZERIA - MEETING SUPPLIESUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 150.31 SL 12/17 HOBBY LOBBY - FOOD EXPLORER MTG TRAININGUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 18.53 SL 12/05 SELF PARKING - PARKING FOR MEETINGUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 10.00 EOC TOTAL: 5,638.84
GENERAL FUND TOTAL: 1,427,553.71
102 - GEN. FD-CITY HALL
NON-DEPARTMENTAL
JAN'25 CH INTRUSION DETECTIONSONITROL ORANGE COUNTY LLC 383.54 JAN'25 CH ACCESS CONTROLSONITROL ORANGE COUNTY LLC 609.40 DEC'24 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE CHNIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 701.73 JAN'25 CH ELEVATOR MAINTENANCETHURSTON ELEVATOR CONCEPTS INC 137.00 JAN-DEC'25 GENERATOR MONITORING SUBSCRIPTION CHAYANTRA INC 240.00 JAN'25 CH ASO ASSOCIATION DUESPACIFIC PARK II ASSOCIATION 502.00 12/03/24-01/03/25 MTR#16122180 CH GAS SVCTHE GAS COMPANY 935.95 DEC'24 ACCT#7189 CH ELECTRICITYSO CAL EDISON 4,699.25
ACCT#65408/65407/65406 CH WATER SVCMOULTON NIGUEL WATER DIST 611.61 NON-DEPARTMENTAL TOTAL: 8,820.48
GEN. FD-CITY HALL TOTAL: 8,820.48
103 - GF-AV RECREATION SERVICES
RECREATION SERVICES
DEC'24 PVM AVR MAINTENANCEPV MAINTENANCE INC 681.00
JAN'25 AVR - CASH COURIER SERVICEGARDAWORLD 546.74
12/27 AVR LINEN DRY CLEANINGPRESTIGIOUS CLEANERS LLC 13.99 12/27 AVR LINEN DRY CLEANINGPRESTIGIOUS CLEANERS LLC 381.02 JAN'25 AVCENTER AND AQC ACCESS CONTROLSONITROL ORANGE COUNTY LLC 125.20 JAN'25 AVR ACCESS CONTROLSONITROL ORANGE COUNTY LLC 535.57 OCT-DEC'24 C2500 AVR PRINTS (8774)RICOH USA 340.20
DEC'24 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE AVRNIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 2,341.86 DEC'24 RENEWABLE FARMSAARON FLORA 9,244.43
12/23/24-01/22/25 AVR O365 LICENSING AND SUPPORTTANGENT COMPUTERS INC 525.30 JB 11/25 HOBBY LOBBY-REPLACEMENT RENTAL ARCHUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 70.55 11/22/24-12/21/24 AVR-ALARM/POTS LINEAT&T 1,263.10
DEC'24 CREDIT CARD SERVICE FEES - POSCSG FORTE PAYMENTS, INC 340.59 DEC'24 CREDIT CARD SERVICE FEES - WEBCSG FORTE PAYMENTS, INC 330.85 FALL2024-FAL129 IMPROV - 4 PARTICIPANTSJENNIFER BALES 264.00 FALL2024-FAL040/135/028/032 GYMNASTICS-21 PARTICIPTUMBLE-N-KIDS, INC 1,301.40 FALL2024-FAL107/181/184 HULA - 11 PARTICIPANTSANGIE DOROTHY ABAD 441.00 FALL2024-FAL062 SPORTS - 3 PARTICIPANTSEPC PLAYTIME 250.20 FALL2024-FAL605 DANCE - 2 PARTICIPANTSSWAY BALLROOM INC 96.00 FALL2024-FAL132 GUITAR/UKULELE - 3 PARTICIPANTSRONALD GORMAN 153.00 FALL2024-FAL011 MUSIC -10 PARTICIPANTSMUSIC MOVES ACADEMY INC 240.00 12/18 AVR BOTTLED WATER SERVICEDS SERVICES OF AMERICA, INC 54.75 11/17/24-12/16/24 REC TABLETAT&T 40.24
11/17/24-12/16/24 REC PHONE LINESAT&T 181.88
DEC'24 GCF SECURITY SERVICESLYONS SECURITY SERVICE IN 291.38 DEC'24 AVR EVENT SECURITY SERVICESLYONS SECURITY SERVICE IN 1,165.50 DEC'24 RCS OFFICE SUPPLIESSTAPLES ADVANTAGE 8.39
9/08/24-12/01/24 HOOPERSFACILITRON, INC. 76.33
DEC'24 ACCT#4551 FARM ELECTRICITYSO CAL EDISON 321.87
DEC'24 ACCT#6247 AVR ELECTRICITYSO CAL EDISON 3,255.20
9/08/24-12/08/24 ANHS TENNISFACILITRON, INC. 191.34
JAN'25 AVR GOTO VOIP SERVICE & SUPPORTGOTO COMMUNICATIONS 666.64 KB 12/18 MCFADDDEN DALE-AVR DOLLY WHEELS REPAIUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 287.12 ACCT#105234/104936/104935/104986 RANCH WATER SVCMOULTON NIGUEL WATER DIST 1,239.94 15 Description (Item)Vendor Name Amount
ACCT#104515/104519 FARM WATER SVCMOULTON NIGUEL WATER DIST 280.02 11/09/24-12/14/24 SKYHAWKSFACILITRON, INC. 67.38
RECREATION SERVICES TOTAL: 27,613.98
GF-AV RECREATION SERVICES TOTAL: 27,613.98
203 - GAS TAX
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
DEC'24 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MONITORINGHARTZOG & CRABILL INC 2,750.00 DEC'24 TRAFFIC CALMING GUIDELINESRK ENGINEERING GROUP INC 4,500.00 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING TOTAL: 7,250.00
STREET MAINTENANCE
DEC'24 PVM STREET MAINTENANCE GAS TAXPV MAINTENANCE INC 25,524.99 NOV'24 STREET SWEEPING SERVICESSCA OF CA LLC 8,972.06
DEC'24 STREET SWEEPING SERVICESSCA OF CA LLC 8,972.06
DEC'24 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE MEDIANSNIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 1,641.51 DEC'24 ACCT#2125 GS1 MEDIANSSO CAL EDISON 20.87
NOV'24 DATABASE MAINT + 37 TICKETSUNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT OF SOUTHERN CA 78.45 DEC'24 DATABASE MAINT + 33 TICKETSUNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT OF SOUTHERN CA 71.05 NOV'24 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE ROUTINEBEAR ELECTRICAL SOLUTIONS INC 3,225.90 NOV'24 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE RESPONSEBEAR ELECTRICAL SOLUTIONS INC 15,097.10 8/08/24-12/09/24 MTR#5675CALLE CORTEZ MEDIAN WATEREL TORO WATER DISTRICT 539.08 DEC'24 ACCT#6377 LS2 ST LIGHTS ELECTRICITYSO CAL EDISON 1,292.07 DEC'24 ACCT#7241 LS1 ST LIGHTS ELECTRICITYSO CAL EDISON 17,730.67 DEC'24 ACCT#8254 TC1 ST LIGHTS ELECTRICITYSO CAL EDISON 4,075.68 ACCT#64613/64615/65346 MEDIANS WATER SVCMOULTON NIGUEL WATER DIST 801.23 STREET MAINTENANCE TOTAL: 88,042.72
GAS TAX TOTAL: 95,292.72
204 - MEASURE M
GEN-MEASURE M
DEC'24 M2 FUND TRANSPORTATION SVCCABCO YELLOW INC 2,544.00 NOV'24 M2 FUND TRANSPORTATION SVCCABCO YELLOW INC 2,832.00 GEN-MEASURE M TOTAL: 5,376.00
MEASURE M TOTAL: 5,376.00
215 - PUBLIC SAFETY GRANTS
LAW ENFORCEMENT-OTHER
AV 11/27 SP N-EAR.COM - TACTICAL EARPIECESUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 298.00 DEC'24 AUTOMATED FINGERPRINT IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMCOUNTY OF ORANGE 1,518.00 JAN'25 E CITATION/MDC EQUIPMENTCOUNTY OF ORANGE 6,120.27 LAW ENFORCEMENT-OTHER TOTAL: 7,936.27
PUBLIC SAFETY GRANTS TOTAL: 7,936.27
225 - INTEGRATED WASTE MGMT FD
GEN-TECHNOLOGY GRANTS
NOV'24 CAA - CONTRACT SERVICES - SB1383CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOC INC 285.00 GEN-TECHNOLOGY GRANTS TOTAL: 285.00
INTEGRATED WASTE MGMT FD TOTAL: 285.00
241 - TECHNOLOGY FUND
GEN-TECHNOLOGY GRANTS
JAN-MAR'25 GRANICUS-WEBSTREAMINGGRANICUS INC 4,380.49
DEC'24-CITY COUNCIL MTG 12/4ERIC WINTER 665.38
GEN-TECHNOLOGY GRANTS TOTAL: 5,045.87
TECHNOLOGY FUND TOTAL: 5,045.87
251 - FEDERAL GRANTS
GEN-FEDERAL GRANT
JUL'24 CDBG-CV PROFESSIONAL SERVICESMIKE LINARES INC 330.00 JUL'24 CDBG PROFESSIONAL SERVICESMIKE LINARES INC 1,320.00 AUG'24 CDBG PROFESSIONAL SERVICESMIKE LINARES INC 1,155.00 16 Description (Item)Vendor Name Amount
AUG'24 CDBG-CV PROFESSIONAL SERVICESMIKE LINARES INC 220.00 SEP'24 CDBG PROFESSIONAL SERVICESMIKE LINARES INC 880.00 SEP'24 CDBG-CV PROFESSIONAL SERVICESMIKE LINARES INC 55.00 OCT'24 CDBG CONSULTANT SERVICESMIKE LINARES INC 1,430.00 GEN-FEDERAL GRANT TOTAL: 5,390.00
FEDERAL GRANTS TOTAL: 5,390.00
261 - CITY FAC.-AQUATIC CENTER
GEN-AQUATIC CENTER
JAN'25 AQC - CASH COURIER SERVICEGARDAWORLD 490.94
DEC'24 AQC TREE TRIMMINGGREAT SCOTT TREE SERVICE, INC 2,175.60 DEC'24 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE AQCNIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 944.42 JAN'25 ACCT#6701 AQC INTERNETCOX COMMUNICATIONS, INC 510.81 DEC'24 POOL MAINTENANCEAQUATIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC 2,693.00 12/04/24-01/04/25 MTR#15672349 AQC GAS SVCTHE GAS COMPANY 4,258.02 KB 12/02 SCP DISTRIBUTORS - AQC POOL LIGHT REPAIRUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 192.51 KB 12/12 THE HOMEDEPOT - AQC WATERLINE REPAIRUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 59.24 KB 11/26 THE HOME DEPOT-AQC POOL DECK LIGHTINGUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 86.52 ACCT#64095/64096 AQC WATER SVCMOULTON NIGUEL WATER DIST 593.95 GEN-AQUATIC CENTER TOTAL: 12,005.01
CITY FAC.-AQUATIC CENTER TOTAL: 12,005.01
311 - STREET IMPROVEMENTS
STREETS & HIGHWAYS
DEC'24 ALISO CREEK REHAB DESIGNENGINEERING RESOURCES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 8,430.00 ALISO CREEK AND ENTERPRISE VIDEO DETECTION UNITJTB SUPPLY COMPANY, INC 24,705.38 NOV'24 ALISO VIEJO PARKWAY REHAB DESIGNENGINEERING RESOURCES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 2,848.75 STREETS & HIGHWAYS TOTAL: 35,984.13
STREET IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL: 35,984.13
331 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
CITY HALL - ROOFTOP UNIT HVAC REPLACEMENT PROJECTCREATIVE AIR MECHANICAL SERVICES, LLC 48,252.00 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL: 48,252.00
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL: 48,252.00
731 - CFD 2005-01
TRUST FUND
OCT-DEC'24 CFD ANNUAL ADMIN SERVICESKOPPEL & GRUBER PUBLIC FIN. 2,364.38 TRUST FUND TOTAL: 2,364.38
CFD 2005-01 TOTAL: 2,364.38
GRAND TOTAL: 1,681,919.55
Fund Summary
Payment AmountFund Expense Amount
101 - GENERAL FUND 1,427,553.711,427,553.71
102 - GEN. FD-CITY HALL 8,820.488,820.48
103 - GF-AV RECREATION SERVICES 27,613.9827,613.98
203 - GAS TAX 95,292.7295,292.72
204 - MEASURE M 5,376.005,376.00
215 - PUBLIC SAFETY GRANTS 7,936.277,936.27
225 - INTEGRATED WASTE MGMT FD 285.00285.00
241 - TECHNOLOGY FUND 5,045.875,045.87
251 - FEDERAL GRANTS 5,390.005,390.00
261 - CITY FAC.-AQUATIC CENTER 12,005.0112,005.01
311 - STREET IMPROVEMENTS 35,984.1335,984.13
331 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 48,252.0048,252.00
17 Fund Summary
Payment AmountFund Expense Amount
731 - CFD 2005-01 2,364.382,364.38
1,681,919.55Grand Total: 1,681,919.55
18 Accounts Payable Payable Dates: 12/20/2024 - 01/16/2025 1/15/2025 2:04:52 PM Page 9 of 11
Report Summary
Fund Summary
Payment AmountFund
101 - GENERAL FUND 1,427,553.71
102 - GEN. FD-CITY HALL 8,820.48
103 - GF-AV RECREATION SERVICES 27,613.98
203 - GAS TAX 95,292.72
204 - MEASURE M 5,376.00
215 - PUBLIC SAFETY GRANTS 7,936.27
225 - INTEGRATED WASTE MGMT FD 285.00
241 - TECHNOLOGY FUND 5,045.87
251 - FEDERAL GRANTS 5,390.00
261 - CITY FAC.-AQUATIC CENTER 12,005.01
311 - STREET IMPROVEMENTS 35,984.13
331 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 48,252.00
731 - CFD 2005-01 2,364.38
1,681,919.55Grand Total:
Account Summary
Payment AmountAccount Number Account Name
101-1203-000 ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 961.05
101-2505-000 DENTAL INSURANCE PA… 1,927.28
101-2506-000 MEDICAL INSURANCE P… 28,430.42
101-2508-000 VISION INSURANCE PAY… 298.39
101-2602-000 PLANNING DEPOSIT 19,683.60
101-2603-000 ENGINEERING DEPOSIT 16,595.57
101-2606-000 C & D DEPOSIT 500.00
101-32010 BUILDING PERMITS 307.00
101-32020 ELECTRICAL PERMITS 86.06
101-4-1101-4501-000 ADVERTISING & PROMO… 420.56
101-4-1101-4511-000 COMMUNICATION 237.43
101-4-1101-4520-000 MTGS/CONF./TRNG & D… 854.29
101-4-1101-4601-000 SUPPLIES 382.51
101-4-1501-4206-000 MEDICAL INSURANCE 158.00
101-4-1501-4511-000 COMMUNICATION 95.98
101-4-1501-4520-000 MTGS/CONF./TRNG & D… 390.00
101-4-1501-4521-000 MEMBERSHIP & DUES 125.00
101-4-1503-4309-000 OTHER CONTRACTUAL S… 194.90
101-4-1503-4520-000 MTGS/CONF./TRNG & D… 1,241.73
101-4-1503-4601-000 SUPPLIES 25.00
101-4-1503-4612-000 OPERATING SUPPLIES 330.86
101-4-1601-4303-000 LEGAL NOTICES 468.59
101-4-1601-4520-000 MTGS/CONF./TRNG & D… 1,173.91
101-4-1601-4601-000 SUPPLIES 271.91
101-4-2101-4304-000 LEGAL SERVICES 24,150.00
101-4-2101-4532-000 SPECIAL PROJECTS 97.50
101-4-2101-4701-000 NPDES 737.70
101-4-2501-4301-000 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 437.50
101-4-2501-4309-000 OTHER CONTRACTUAL S… 404.38
101-4-2501-4521-000 MEMBERSHIP & DUES 150.00
101-4-2501-4601-000 SUPPLIES 20.03
101-4-3101-4301-000 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,916.67
101-4-3101-4305-000 TECHNOLOGY SERVICES 8,251.37
101-4-3101-4481-000 COMPUTER EXPENSE 9,302.60
101-4-3501-4301-000 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 213.30
101-4-3501-4422-000 EQUIP RENTAL LEASE - P… 617.99
101-4-3501-4431-000 BUILDING & GROUND M… 5,843.92
101-4-3501-4471-000 RENT 449.73
101-4-3501-4513-000 PRINTING 96.18
101-4-3501-4521-000 MEMBERSHIP & DUES 1,982.00
19 Accounts Payable Payable Dates: 12/20/2024 - 01/16/2025 1/15/2025 2:04:52 PM Page 10 of 11
Account Summary
Payment AmountAccount Number Account Name
101-4-3501-4542-000 INTEREST EXPENSE - LEA… 76.21
101-4-3501-4553-000 COMMUNITY BRANDING 1,568.99
101-4-3501-4601-000 SUPPLIES 392.16
101-4-3501-4612-000 OPERATING SUPPLIES 4,121.35
101-4-4101-4206-000 MEDICAL INSURANCE 316.00
101-4-4101-4501-000 ADVERTISING & PROMO… 12,792.55
101-4-4101-4524-000 RECREATION-SENIOR TR… 1,344.00
101-4-4101-4527-000 REC-CITY SPECIAL EVENTS 4,418.52
101-4-4101-4601-000 SUPPLIES 200.13
101-4-4102-4411-000 UTILITIES 7,090.97
101-4-4102-4431-000 BUILDING & GROUND M… 8,914.75
101-4-4103-4411-000 UTILITIES 2,170.72
101-4-4103-4431-000 BUILDING & GROUND M… 109.39
101-4-4104-4529-000 REC-YOUTH PROGRAMS 30,000.00
101-4-4401-4206-000 MEDICAL INSURANCE 158.00
101-4-4401-4309-000 OTHER CONTRACTUAL S… 1,425.00
101-4-4401-4731-000 GENERAL PLAN 1,400.00
101-4-4402-4751-000 C.S-BUILDING 131,816.31
101-4-4403-4761-000 C.S-CODE ENFORCEMENT 15,983.20
101-4-4501-4471-000 RENT 1,035.00
101-4-4501-4521-000 MEMBERSHIP & DUES 321.00
101-4-4501-4562-000 PERMITS 109,894.87
101-4-4501-4612-000 OPERATING SUPPLIES 120.72
101-4-4501-4701-000 NPDES 10,459.28
101-4-4501-4702-000 AB939-SOLID WASTE 3,122.50
101-4-4501-4741-000 C.S-CITY ENGINEERING 3,996.23
101-4-4503-4771-000 C.S-STREET MAINTENAN… 20,884.08
101-4-5101-4308-000 LAW ENFORCEMENT 892,517.60
101-4-5102-4511-000 COMMUNICATION 45.47
101-4-5102-4516-000 FUEL 604.99
101-4-5102-4520-000 MTGS/CONF./TRNG & D… 966.47
101-4-5102-4612-000 OPERATING SUPPLIES 2,281.23
101-4-5102-4721-000 C.S-CROSSING GUARDS 21,536.27
101-4-5401-4301-000 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,605.00
101-4-5401-4471-000 RENT 580.00
101-4-5401-4520-000 MTGS/CONF/TRNG & D… 178.84
101-4-5401-4612-000 OPERATING SUPPLIES 3,275.00
102-4-3501-4411-000 UTILITIES 6,246.81
102-4-3501-4431-000 BUILDING & GROUND M… 2,573.67
103-4-4105-4305-000 TECHNOLOGY SERVICES 3,456.01
103-4-4105-4309-000 OTHER CONTRACTUAL S… 3,080.65
103-4-4105-4411-000 UTILITIES 4,495.14
103-4-4105-4431-000 BUILDING & GROUND M… 4,475.48
103-4-4105-4451-000 FARM OPERATING EXPE… 10,137.70
103-4-4105-4511-000 COMMUNICATION 222.12
103-4-4105-4561-000 TAXES/FEES/PERMITS 1,218.18
103-4-4105-4601-000 SUPPLIES 63.14
103-4-4105-4612-000 OPERATING SUPPLIES 395.01
103-4-4105-4620-000 MINOR EQUIPMENT 70.55
203-4-4502-4301-000 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7,250.00
203-4-4503-4411-000 UTILITIES 24,459.60
203-4-4503-4771-000 C.S-STREET MAINTENAN… 45,639.00
203-4-4503-4772-000 C.S-STREET SWEEPING 17,944.12
204-4-6104-4309-000 OTHER CONTRACTUAL S… 5,376.00
215-4-5102-4803-000 PUBLIC SAFETY EQUIPM… 7,936.27
225-4-6141-4309-000 OTHER CONTRACTUAL S… 285.00
241-4-6141-4309-000 OTHER CONTRACTUAL S… 665.38
241-4-6141-4481-000 IT/COMPUTER EQUIPM… 4,380.49
20 Accounts Payable Payable Dates: 12/20/2024 - 01/16/2025 1/15/2025 2:04:52 PM Page 11 of 11
Account Summary
Payment AmountAccount Number Account Name
251-4-6151-4309-000 OTHER CONTRACTUAL S… 5,390.00
261-4-6161-7401-000 EQUIPMENT MAINTENA… 2,693.00
261-4-6161-7411-000 UTILITIES 5,362.78
261-4-6161-7421-000 BUILDING & GROUND M… 3,458.29
261-4-6161-7445-000 FEES & PERMITS 490.94
311-4-8301-5501-000 DESIGN 11,278.75
311-4-8301-5701-000 CONSTRUCTION 24,705.38
331-4-8701-5910-000 IMPROVEMENTS 48,252.00
731-4-7501-4542-000 INTEREST & FISCAL CHGS 2,364.38
Grand Total: 1,681,919.55
Project Account Summary
Payment AmountProject Account Key
**None** 1,549,428.30
0635910 48,252.00
1002FALL 3,080.65
10034301 1,605.00
1345701 24,705.38
1385501 11,278.75
9014612 54.87
9024612 4,000.77
9294520 179.29
9314520 675.00
9934527 1,490.37
CDBGCV4309 605.00
ENG 2242 17,302.30
ENG 2243 -2,337.39
ENG 2244 1,535.66
ENG 2254 47.50
ENG 2256 47.50
SB13834309 285.00
SDP-2022-0004 13,913.60
SDP-2024-00001 3,657.50
SDP-2024-00002 780.00
USE-2024-00003 1,332.50
Grand Total: 1,681,919.55
21 City of Aliso Viejo
AGENDA ITEM
DATE: February 5, 2025
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Ann Eifert, Director of Financial Services/City Treasurer SUBJECT: TREASURER’S STATEMENT – DECEMBER 2024
Recommended Action:
Receive and file the December 2024 Treasurer’s Statement.
Fiscal Impact:
No Fiscal Impact.
Background:
Per City policy, the Finance Department presents the monthly Treasurer’s Statement for the City Council’s review. This statement shows the cash balance for all City funds, a breakdown of bank account balances, investment account balances and the effective yield earned from investments.
Discussion:
The City’s portfolio consists of investments in Certificates of Deposits, US Treasuries, US Federal Agencies, Corporate Bonds, and Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF). All funds invested with LAIF are available for withdrawal within 24 hours.
The Treasurer’s Statement provides information regarding the City’s investment portfolio and activity during the reporting month. The City’s investment portfolio is in compliance with all government codes as well as the City’s investment policy. Interest is credited to the City’s bank account monthly and allocated among the City’s funds. The current portfolio provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the upcoming operating expenses and spending requirements for the next 6 months.
Attachment:
1. December 2024 Treasurer’s Statement
22 TREASURER'S MONTHLY CASH STATEMENT
BEGINNING ENDING
BALANCE RECEIPTS DISBURSEMENTS BALANCE
CASH BALANCE (ALL FUNDS) 8,106,106.62$ 4,648,464.99$ 2,936,377.58$ 9,818,194.03$ CITY TRUST FUNDS:
AV RANCH FOUNDATION 100.00$ 100.00 CFD 2005-01 172,281.32 $ 556,854.41 736,760.77 (7,625.04) COMMUNITY TRUST 5,562.68$ 5,562.68
CASH BALANCE TOTALS 8,284,050.62$ 5,205,319.40$ 3,673,138.35$ 9,816,231.67$ SUMMARY OF CASH:
DEMAND DEPOSITS: GENERAL ACCOUNT 405,759.45 $
INVESTMENTS: LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FD 7,642,981.28$
MONEY MARKET/SWEEP ACCOUNT 1,767,490.94$
TOTAL CASH 9,816,231.67 $
Years to Maturity for December 2024 1.62
Weighted Average Yield for December 2024 4.000%
All investments are placed in accordance with the City of Aliso Viejo's Investment Policy.
The above summary provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six month's estimated expenditures.
Other monies held include Cash with Fiscal Agent, Investments, Payroll and AV Center. 39,075,323.88$ Cash With Fiscal Agent COPS/CFD 2005-01 2,290,193.17
Cash With Investment Advisor City Investments 34,684,688.24 AV Center 1,543,985.26
PR Account 554,492.60
Petty Cash 1,964.61
GRAND TOTAL OF CITY FUNDS 48,891,555.55$
CITY OF ALISO VIEJO
December 31, 2024
23 Portfolio Summary
CURRENT
MONTH
Beginning 36,359,820.87
Contributions/Withdrawals 0.00
Management Fees 0.00
Custodian Fees (229.68)
Realized Gains Losses 1,657.05
Purchased Interest 0.00
Interest Received 90,930.94
ENDING 36,452, 179. 18
4.00 Weighted Average Yield to Maturity
1.62 Weighted Average Maturity (Y ears)
1.83 Portfolio Effective Duration (Y ears)
1.62 Weighted Average Life (Y ears)
AA
Average Credit Rating
Reconciliation
Sector Allocation
• 1 U.S. Treasuries 52.00%
• 1 LGIP 17.24%
• 1 U.S. Agencies 10.22%
• 1 Corporate Bonds 9.57%
• 1 Negotiable CD's 6.99%
• 1 Money Market Funds 3.99%
Maturity Distribution
Projected Monthly Income Schedule
CITY OF ALISO VIEJO
DECEMBER 31, 2024
24 CITY OF ALISO VIEJO | DECEMBER 31, 2024
CUSIP DESCRIPTION
TRADE DA TE
SETTLE DA TE PAR V ALUE
PRINCIPAL COST
PURCHASED
INTEREST TOT AL COST
YIELD TO
MA TURITY
MA TURITY
DAT E
DA YS TO
MA TURITY
MARKET PRICE
MARKET V ALUE
UNREALIZED
GAIN/LOSS
BOOK V ALUE
% OF
MV
MOODY'S
S&P
RA TING
CITY OF ALISO VIEJO
LGIP
CALAIF California LAIF 12/31/2024
12/31/2024 7,642,981.28 7,642,981.28
0.00 7,642,981.28 4.43 1 1.00
7,642,981.28
0.00 7,642,981.28 17.24
LGIP TOT AL 7,642,981.28 7,642,981.28
0.00 7,642,981.28 4.43 1 1.00
7,642,981.28
0.00 7,642,981.28 17.24 NA
MONEY MARKET
FUNDS
31846V567 FIRST AMER:GVT
OBLG;Z
12/31/2024
12/31/2024 1,767,490.94 1,767,490.94
0.00 1,767,490.94 4.35 1 1.00
1,767,490.94
0.00 1,767,490.94 3.99 Aaa
AAA
MONEY MARKET
FUNDS TOT AL 1,767,490.94 1,767,490.94
0.00 1,767,490.94 4.35 1 1.00
1,767,490.94
0.00 1,767,490.94 3.99 AAA
U.S. TREASURIES
912797KJ5 US TREASURY BILL
03/20/25
05/08/2024
05/08/2024 2,000,000.00 1,913,519.58
0.00 1,913,519.58 5. 16 03/20/2025 79 99. 11
1,982, 130.54
68,610.96
1,913,519.58 4.47 P-1
A-1 +
912797LB1 US TREASURY BILL
05/15/25
06/11/2024
06/13/2024 1,000,000.00 953,923.20
0.00 953,923.20 5. 19 05/15/2025 135 98.47
984,692.65
32,818.78
951,873.87 2.22 P-1
A-1 +
912797LB1 US TREASURY BILL
05/15/25
05/31/2024
05/31/2024 1,000,000.00
951,873.87
0.00 951,873.87 5.24 05/15/2025 135 98.47
984,692.65
30,769.45
953,923.20 2.22 P-1
A-1 +
91282CHL8 US TREASURY 4.625
06/30/25
11/10/2023
11/10/2023 1,000,000.00 993,398.44
0.00 993,398.44 5.05 06/30/2025 181 100.23
1,002,343.75
8,945.31
993,398.44 2.26 Aaa
AA+
91282CEY3 US TREASURY 3.000
07 /15/25
05/30/2023
05/30/2023 1,000,000.00 973,437.50
0.00 973,437.50 4.32 07 /15/2025 196 99.34
993,437.50
20,000.00
973,437.50 2.24 Aaa
AA+
91282CFE6 US TREASURY 3. 125
08/15/25
01/13/2023
01/13/2023 1,000,000.00 980,078.13
0.00 980,078.13 3.94 08/15/2025 227 99.32
993, 164.06
13,085.93
980,078.13 2.24 Aaa
AA+
91282CFP1 US TREASURY 4.250
10/15/25
05/30/2023
05/30/2023 1,000,000.00 1,000,625.00
0.00 1,000,625.00 4.22 10/15/2025 288 100.02
1,000,234.38
(390.62)
1,000,625.00 2.26 Aaa
AA+
912828M56 US TREASURY 2.250
11/15/25
05/30/2023
05/30/2023 1,000,000.00 955, 117. 19
0.00 955, 117. 19 4. 19 11/15/2025 319 98.29
982,851.56
27,734.37
955, 117. 19 2.22 Aaa
AA+
91282CGL9 US TREASURY 4.000
02/15/26
05/30/2023
05/30/2023 1,000,000.00 997,578. 13
0.00 997,578. 13 4.09 02/15/2026 411 99.74
997,382.81
(195.32)
997,578. 13 2.25 Aaa
AA+
91282CGV7 US TREASURY 3.750
04/15/26
01/22/2024
01/22/2024 1,200,000.00 1, 187,437.50
0.00 1, 187,437.50 4.24 04/15/2026 470 99.36
1, 192,359.37
4,921.87
1, 187,437.50 2.69 Aaa
AA+
91282CCF6 US TREASURY 0.750
05/31/26
06/13/2022
06/13/2022 1,000,000.00 915,976.56
0.00 915,976.56 3.01 05/31/2026 516 95.24
952,421.88
36,445.32
915,976.56 2. 15 Aaa
AA+
91282CCJ8 US TREASURY 0.875
06/30/26
06/29/2022
06/29/2022 1,000,000.00 913, 125.00
0.00 913, 125.00 3.20 06/30/2026 546 95. 16
951,601.56
38,476.56
913, 125.00 2. 15 Aaa
AA+
91282CCP4 US TREASURY 0.625
07 /31/26
01/13/2023
01/13/2023 1, 100,000.00 987,292.97
0.00 987,292.97 3.73 07 /31/2026 577 94.51
1,039,628.91
52,335.94
987,292.97 2.34 Aaa
AA+
91282CJT9 US TREASURY 4.000
01/15/27
01/22/2024
01/22/2024 1,000,000.00 996,718.75
0.00 996,718.75 4. 12 01/15/2027 745 99.52
995, 156.25
(1,562.50)
996,718.75 2.24 Aaa
AA+
912828X88 US TREASURY 2.375
05/15/27
06/29/2022
06/29/2022 1,000,000.00 962,851.56
0.00 962,851.56 3.20 05/15/2027 865 95.77
957,734.38
(5, 117. 18)
962,851.56 2. 16 Aaa
AA+
Position Statement
25 CITY OF ALISO VIEJO | DECEMBER 31, 2024
CUSIP DESCRIPTION
TRADE DA TE
SETTLE DA TE PAR V ALUE
PRINCIPAL COST
PURCHASED
INTEREST TOT AL COST
YIELD TO
MA TURITY
MA TURITY
DAT E
DA YS TO
MA TURITY
MARKET PRICE
MARKET V ALUE
UNREALIZED
GAIN/LOSS
BOOK V ALUE
% OF
MV
MOODY'S
S&P
RA TING
9128282R0 US TREASURY 2.250
08/15/27
01/13/2023
01/13/2023 1,050,000.00 990,322.27
0.00 990,322.27 3.60 08/15/2027 957 95.05
997,992. 19
7,669.92
990,322.27 2.25 Aaa
AA+
9128284N7 US TREASURY 2.875
05/15/28
09/18/2024
09/19/2024 1,000,000.00 979,882.81
0.00 979,882.81 3.47 05/15/2028 1,231 95.54
955,390.63
(24,492. 18)
979,882.81 2. 15 Aaa
AA+
91282CCR0 US TREASURY 1.000
07 /31/28
09/18/2024
09/19/2024 1,000,000.00 910,507.81
1,358.70 911,866.51 3.50 07 /31/2028 1,308 89.04
890,390.63
(20, 117. 18)
910,507.81 2.01 Aaa
AA+
91282CCV1 US TREASURY 1. 125
08/31/28
12/21/2023
12/21/2023 1,000,000.00 878,750.00
0.00 878,750.00 3.98 08/31/2028 1,339 89.20
892,031.25
13,281.25
878,750.00 2.01 Aaa
AA+
91282CDF5 US TREASURY 1.375
10/31/28
12/21/2023
12/21/2023 1,500,000.00 1,328,906.25
0.00 1,328,906.25 3.98 10/31/2028 1,400 89.57
1,343,554.70
14,648.45
1,328,906.25 3.03 Aaa
AA+
91282CJR3 US TREASURY 3.750
12/31/28
01/22/2024
01/22/2024 1,000,000.00 987,695.31
0.00 987,695.31 4.03 12/31/2028 1,461 97.78
977,812.50
(9,882.81)
987,695.31 2.21 Aaa
AA+
91282CLR0 US TREASURY 4. 125
10/31/29
11/25/2024
11/26/2024 1,000,000.00 996,445.31
2,962.71 999,408.02 4.21 10/31/2029 1,765 98.88
988,750.00
(7,695.31)
996,445.31 2.23 Aaa
AA+
U.S. TREASURIES
TOTAL 23,850,000.00 22,755,463. 14
4,321.41 22,759,784.55 4. 13 665 96.80
23,055,754. 14
300,291.00
22,755,463. 14 52.00 AA+
U.S. AGENCIES
3137EAEX3 FREDDIE MAC 0.375
09/23/25 MTN
10/20/2020
10/20/2020 500,000.00 497,505.00
0.00 497,505.00 0.48 09/23/2025 266 97.22
486, 110.00
(11,395.00)
497,505.00 1. 10 Aaa
AA+
3130AK5J1 FHLBANKS 0.700
09/18/26 '24
02/16/2023
02/16/2023 1,000,000.00 872,060.00
0.00 872,060.00 4.61 09/18/2026 626 93.76
937,550.00
65,490.00
872,060.00 2. 11 Aaa
AA+
3130ASD63 FHLBANKS 3.250
06/28/27 '24
06/28/2022
06/28/2022 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00
0.00 1,000,000.00 3.25 06/28/2027 909 97.08
970,840.00
(29, 160.00)
1,000,000.00 2. 19 Aaa
AA+
3133EPAU9 FED FARM CR BNKS
3.875 07 /14/27
02/16/2023
02/16/2023 1,000,000.00 990,390.00
0.00 990,390.00 4. 12 07 /14/2027 925 98.91
989, 140.00
(1,250.00)
990,390.00 2.23 Aaa
AA+
3136G4X99 FANNIE MAE 0.740
08/25/27 '24
04/06/2023
04/06/2023 1,000,000.00 876,610.00
0.00 876,610.00 3.82 08/25/2027 967 90.41
904,070.00
27,460.00
876,610.00 2.04 Aaa
AA+
3130B2GZ2 FHLBANKS 4.200
08/13/29 '26
08/21/2024
08/23/2024 250,000.00 250,000.00
0.00 250,000.00 4.20 08/13/2029 1,686 97.68
244, 195.00
(5,805.00)
250,000.00 0.55 Aaa
AA+
U.S. AGENCIES
TOTAL 4,750,000.00 4,486,565.00
0.00 4,486,565.00 3.59 838 95.51
4,531,905.00
45,340.00
4,486,565.00 10.22 AA+
NEGOTIABLE CD'S
61690UUJ7 MSBNA 1.800 02/27 /25 02/28/2020
02/28/2020 245,000.00 244,416.90
0.00 244,416.90 1.85 02/27 /2025 58 99.58
243,980.80
(436. 10)
244,416.90 0.55 NA
NA
14042RPG0 CAPITL ONE NA 1.600
04/08/25
04/09/2020
04/09/2020 245,000.00 244,412.00
0.00 244,412.00 1.65 04/08/2025 98 99.23
243, 111.05
(1,300.95)
244,412.00 0.55 NA
NA
866264DP6 SUMMIT ST A TE BNK
0.850 05/15/25
05/18/2020
05/18/2020 245,000.00 244,402.20
0.00 244,402.20 0.90 05/15/2025 135 98.45
241,192.70
(3,209.50)
244,402.20 0.54 NA
NA
33847E3J4 FLAGST AR BNK 0.900
05/15/25
05/15/2020
05/15/2020 245,000.00 245,000.00
0.00 245,000.00 0.90 05/15/2025 135 98.56
241,462.20
(3,537.80)
245,000.00 0.54 NA
NA
89235MJS1 TOYOT A FINL SVGS
0.800 06/30/25
06/30/2020
06/30/2020 245,000.00 245,000.00
0.00 245,000.00 0.80 06/30/2025 181 97.75
239,489.95
(5,510.05)
245,000.00 0.54 NA
NA
59013KLQ7 MERRICK BANK 0.550
12/30/25
12/30/2020
12/30/2020 245,000.00
245,000.00
0.00 245,000.00 0.55 12/30/2025 364 95.53
234,055.85
(10,944. 15)
245,000.00 0.53 NA
NA
Position Statement
26 CITY OF ALISO VIEJO | DECEMBER 31, 2024
CUSIP DESCRIPTION
TRADE DA TE
SETTLE DA TE PAR V ALUE
PRINCIPAL COST
PURCHASED
INTEREST TOT AL COST
YIELD TO
MA TURITY
MA TURITY
DAT E
DA YS TO
MA TURITY
MARKET PRICE
MARKET V ALUE
UNREALIZED
GAIN/LOSS
BOOK V ALUE
% OF
MV
MOODY'S
S&P
RA TING
02007GXG3 ALL Y BANK 3.450
08/04/26
08/04/2022
08/04/2022 245,000.00 245,000.00
0.00 245,000.00 3.45 08/04/2026 581 97.77
239,541.40
(5,458.60)
245,000.00 0.54 NA
NA
38149MYB3 GOLDMAN BANK USA
1.000 08/11/26
08/11/2021
08/11/2021 245,000.00 245,000.00
0.00 245,000.00 1.00 08/11/2026 588 94.03
230,371.05
(14,628.95)
245,000.00 0.52 NA
NA
90348JR93 UBS USA 0.950 08/11/26 08/11/2021
08/11/2021 245,000.00 245,000.00
0.00 245,000.00 0.95 08/11/2026 588 94.29
231,020.30
(13,979.70)
245,000.00 0.52 NA
NA
254673N44 DISCOVER BANK 3.500
07/29/27
08/03/2022
08/03/2022 245,000.00 245,000.00
0.00 245,000.00 3.50 07/29/2027 940 96.77
237,095.60
(7,904.40)
245,000.00 0.53 NA
NA
87164XN93 SYNCHRONY BANK
3.500 08/05/27
08/05/2022
08/05/2022 245,000.00 245,000.00
0.00 245,000.00 3.50 08/05/2027 947 96.76
237,050.75
(7,949.25)
245,000.00 0.53 NA
NA
02589ADQ2 AM EX BK 3.450 08/10/27 08/12/2022
08/12/2022 245,000.00 243,775.00
0.00 243,775.00 3.56 08/10/2027 952 95.44
233,828.00
(9,947.00)
243,775.00
0.53 NA
NA
58404DVV0 MEDALLION BANK 3.800
08/30/29
08/21/2024
08/30/2024 245,000.00 245,000.00
0.00 245,000.00 3.80 08/30/2029 1,703 100.00
245,000.00
0.00 245,000.00 0.55 NA
NA
NEGOTIABLE CD'S
TOTAL 3, 185,000.00 3, 182,006. 10
0.00 3, 182,006. 10 2.04 558 97.28
3,097, 199.65
(84,806.45)
3, 182,006. 10 6.99 NA
CORPORA TE BONDS
64952WDL4 NYL GLOBAL FUND
2.000 01/22/25
01/22/2020
01/22/2020 500,000.00 498,205.00
0.00 498,205.00 2.08 01/22/2025 22 99.86
499,280.00
1,075.00
498,205.00 1. 13 Aaa
AA+
14913UAR1 CTRPLLR FIN SERV
4.400 10/15/27 MTN
11/25/2024
11/26/2024 500,000.00 498,865.00
2,505.56 501,370.56 4.48 10/15/2027 1,018 99.59
497,960.00
(905.00)
498,865.00 1. 12 A2
A
24422EWR6 JOHN DEERE CAP 4.750
01/20/28 MTN
11/25/2024
11/26/2024 500,000.00 504,235.00
8,312.50 512,547.50 4.46 01/20/2028 1, 115 100.50
502,510.00
(1,725.00)
504,235.00 1. 13 A1
A
931142FB4 WALMART 3.900
04/15/28 '28
11/25/2024
11/26/2024 325,000.00 320,619.00
1,443.54 322,062.54 4.33 04/15/2028 1,201 98.23
319,260.50
(1,358.50)
320,619.00 0.72 Aa2
AA
58933YBD6 MERCK & CO 1.900
12/10/28 '28
11/25/2024
11/26/2024 500,000.00 452,905.00
0.00 452,905.00 4.47 12/10/2028 1,440 90.21
451,030.00
(1,875.00)
452,905.00 1.02 A1
A+
17275RBR2 CISCO SYSTEMS 4.850
02/26/29 '29
11/01/2024
11/04/2024 500,000.00 506,060.00
4,580.56 510,640.56 4.53 02/26/2029 1,518 100.60
503,010.00
(3,050.00)
506,060.00 1. 13 A1
AA-
023135CG9 AMAZON.COM 3.450
04/13/29 '29
11/01/2024
11/04/2024 500,000.00 481,580.00
1,006.25 482,586.25 4.37 04/13/2029 1,564 95.91
479,535.00
(2,045.00)
481,580.00 1.08 A1
AA
30303M8S4 MET A PLA TFORMS 4.300
08/15/29 '29
11/01/2024
11/04/2024 500,000.00 496,070.00
5,076.39 501, 146.39 4.48 08/15/2029 1,688 98.69
493,445.00
(2,625.00)
496,070.00 1. 11 Aa3
AA-
857449AE2 ST A TE STR BK TR 4.782
11/23/29
11/25/2024
11/26/2024 500,000.00 502, 115.00
66.42 502, 181.42 4.69 11/23/2029 1,788 99.62
498,075.00
(4,040.00)
502, 115.00 1. 12 Aa2
AA-
CORPORA TE BONDS
TOTAL 4,325,000.00 4,260,654.00
22,991.22 4,283,645.22 4.20 1,260 98.23
4,244, 105.50
(16,548.50)
4,260,654.00 9.57 A+
CITY OF ALISO VIEJO
TOTAL 45,520,472.22 44,095, 160.46
27,312.63 44, 122,473.09 4.00 591 44,339,436.51
244,276.05
44,095, 160.46 100.00 AA
GRAND TOT AL 45,520,472.22 44,095, 160.46
27,312.63 44, 122,473.09 4.00 591 44,339,436.51
244,276.05
44,095, 160.46 100.00 AA
Position Statement
27 CITY OF ALISO VIEJO | DECEMBER 31, 2024
Transaction Statement
CITY OF ALISO VIEJO
TRADE DA TE SETTLE DA TE CUSIP DESCRIPTION PAR V ALUE BOOK V ALUE TOTAL NET
REALIZED
GAIN/LOSS
MA TURITY
12/03/2024 12/03/2024 3133ELCP7 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS FUNDING CORP
1.625 12/03/2024 (235,000.00) 233,926.05 235,000.00 1,073.95 12/12/2024 12/12/2024 61760A4F3 Morgan Stanley Private Bank, National Association
1.95 12/12/2024 (245,000.00) 244,416.90 245,000.00 583. 10 MA TURITY TOT AL (480,000.00) 478,342.95 480,000.00 1,657.05 28 City of Aliso Viejo
AGENDA ITEM
DATE: February 5, 2025
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: So Kim, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH STC TRAFFIC, INC.
TO PROVIDE TRAFFIC STUDY PEER REVIEW SERVICES
Recommended Action:
Approve and authorize the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with STC Traffic, Inc. for traffic study peer review consulting services.
Fiscal Impact:
There will be no fiscal impact as project applicants will be required to submit deposits up front to cover the cost of STC Traffic, Inc. services.
Background:
In September 2022, the City Manager authorized a professional services agreement with STC Traffic, Inc. (STC) to peer review traffic analyses submitted by applicants for development projects, with a budget of $50,000, an initial term ending in December 2022, and with options to renew the agreement for two additional one-year terms through 2024.
In December 2022, the City Manager approved the first amendment, extending the agreement term by one year to December 31, 2023. In August 2023, the City Council approved a second amendment, increasing the total compensation from $50,000 to $100,000. In December 2023, the City Manager approved a third amendment, extending the agreement for an additional year, now ending on December 30, 2024.
In November 2024, the City Council approved an amendment to extend the agreement beyond the original renewal term to June 2027 to allow STC to complete review of projects already in progress. Staff informed the City Council at that time that Staff will conduct a Request for Proposal per the Purchasing Policy for traffic study peer review consulting services for new development projects.
29
Discussion:
Recently, several new development projects have been submitted to the City. With the increase in new development applications with anticipated peer review needs, Staff released a notice inviting informal bids for traffic study peer review consulting services in December 2024. The notice was emailed to various consulting firms recommended by other Orange County cities. Staff received six proposals in response to the City’s request for proposals. All six proposals were from reputable firms with comparable qualifications and experience with similar costs, ranging up to $375 in hourly rates.
STC Inc. (“STC”) has been providing quality traffic study peer review consulting services for the past few years. They are familiar with the City and its community concerns and have established team familiarity with City Staff. STC proposes the same key personnel and rates that range up to $290 per hour. Working with the same firm would result in efficiency, as there will be no learning curve in terms of communication styles, response rates, and expectations. Staff has been satisfied with STC’s performance on past projects and expect consistent service levels. Therefore, Staff recommends that the City Council consider awarding STC a new agreement for traffic study peer review services through June 30, 2027, with the option to extend for an additional two years by the City Manager.
The compensation will be set in an amount not to exceed $150,000, which will be fully funded upfront by development applicants.
Attachment:
1. Agreement
30 60367.01100\33488377.1
- 1 -
CITY OF ALISO VIEJO
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR
TRAFFIC STUDY PEER REVIEW SERVICES
1. PARTIES AND DATE.
This Agreement is made and entered into this day of , 2025, by and between the City of Aliso Viejo, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of California with its principal place of business at 12 Journey, Suite 100, Aliso Viejo, California 92656 (“City”) and STC TRAFFIC, INC. , a CORPORATION, with its principal place of business at 5973 AVENIDA ENCINAS, SUITE 218, CARLSBAD, CA 92008 (“Consultant”).
City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to herein as “Party” and collectively as “Parties.”
2. RECIT
ALS.
2.1 Consultant.
Consultant desires to perform and assume responsibility for the provision of professional TRAFFIC STUDY PEER REVIEW SERVICES required by the City on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Consultant represents that it is experienced in providing professional TRAFFIC STUDY PEER REVIEW SERVICES to public clients, is licensed in the State of California, and is familiar with the plans of City.
2.2 Project.
City desires to engage Consultant to render such services for DEVELOPMENT projects (“Project”) as set forth in this Agreement.
3. TERMS.
3.1 Scope of Services and Term.
3.1.1 General Scope of Services. Consultant promises and agrees to furnish to the City all labor, materials, tools, equipment, services, and incidental and customary work necessary to fully and adequately supply the professional TRAFFIC STUDY PEER REVIEW SERVICES consultant services necessary for the Project (“Services”). The Services are more particularly described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. All Services shall be subject to, and performed in accordance with, this Agreement, the exhibits attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations.
3.1.2 Term. The term of th is Agreement shall be from FEBRUARY 6, 2025 to JUNE 30, 2027, unless earlier terminated as provided herein. The City Manager shall have the unilateral option, at its sole discretion, to renew this Agreement annually for no mor e than two additional one-y ear terms.***] Consultant shall complete the Ser vices within the term of this Ag reement, and shall meet any other established schedules and deadlines. 31 60367.01100\33488377.1
- 2 -
3.1.3 Consultant acknowledges and agrees that Consultant’s compensation, as set forth in Paragraph 3.3.1 herein, shall be the sole responsibility of, and be paid for fully by, DEVELOPMENT PROJECT APPLICANTS . Consultant shall not commence Services pursuant to this Agreement until such time as it has been advised, in writing, by City that DEVELOPMENT PROJECT APPLICANTS has deposited with City funds sufficient to fully pay Consultant’s compensation.
3.2 Responsibilities of Consultant.
3.2.1 Control and Payment of Subordinates; Independent Contractor. The Services shall be performed by Consultant or under its supervision. Consultant will determine the means, methods and details of performing the Services subject to the requirements of this Agreement. City retains Consultant on an independent contractor basis and not as an employee.
Consultant shall complete, execute, and submit to City a Request for Taxpayer Identification Number and Certification (IRS FormW -9) prior to commencement of any Services under this Agreement. Neither City, nor any of its officials, officers, directors, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant retains the right to perform similar or different services for others during the term of this Agreement. Any additional personnel performing the Services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall also not be employees of City and shall at all times be under Consultant’s exclusive direction an d control. Consultant shall pay all wages, salaries, and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance of Services under this Agreement and as required by law. Consultant shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such additional personnel, including, but not limited to: social security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, disability insurance, and workers’ compensation insurance.
3.2.2 Schedule of Services.
3.2.2.1 Consultant shall perform the Services expeditiously, within the term of this Agreement. Consultant represents that it has the professional and technical personnel required to perform the Services in conformance with such conditions. In order to facilitate Consultant’s conformance with the Schedule, City shall respond to Consultant’s submittals in a timely manner. Upon request of City, Consultant shall provide a more detailed schedule of anticipated performance to meet the Schedule of Services.
3.2.2.2 Neither City nor Consultant shall be considered in default of this Agreement for delays in perfor mance caused by circumstances beyond the reasonable control of the non-p erforming Party. For purposes of this Agreement, such circumstances include a Force Ma
jeure Event. A Force Majeure Event shall mean an event that materially affects a Party’s performance and is one or more of the following: (1) Acts of God or other natural disasters; (2) terrorism or other acts of a public enemy; (3) orders of governmental authorities (including, without limitation, unreasonable and unforeseeable delay in the issuance of permits or approvals by governmental authorities that are required for the Services); (4) strikes
and other organized labor action occurring at the site and the effects thereof on the S
ervices, only to the extent such strikes and other organized labor action are beyond the control of Consultant and its subcontractors, and
32 60367.01100\33488377.1
- 3 -
to the extent the effects thereof cannot be avoided by use of replacement workers; and (5) pandemics, epidemics or quarantine restrictions. For purposes of this section, “orders of governmental authorities,” includes ordinances, emergency proclamations and orders, rules to protect the public health, welfare and safety, and other actions of a public agency applicable to the Services and Agreement.
3.2.2.3 Should a Force Majeure Event occur, the non -performing Party shall, within a reasonable time of being prevented from performing, give written notice to the other Party describing the circumstances preventing continued performance and the efforts being made to resume performance of this Agreement. Force Majeure Events and/or delays, regardless of the Party responsible for the delay, shall not entitle Consultant to any additional compensation.
Notwithstanding the foregoing in this section, the City may stil l terminate this Agreement in accordance with the termination provisions of this Agreement.
3.2.3 Conformance to Applicable Requirements. All work prepared by Consultant shall be subject to the approval of City.
3.2.4 S ubstitution of Key Personnel . Consultant has represented to City that certain key personnel will perform and coordinate the Services under this Agreement. Should one or more of such personnel become unavailable, Consultant may substitute other personnel of at least equal competence upon written approval of City. In the event that City and Consultant cannot agree as to the substitution of key personnel, City shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement for cause. As discussed below, any personnel who f ail or refuse to perform the Services in a manner acceptable to the City, or who are determined by the City to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Project or a threat to the safety of persons or property, shall be promptly removed from the Project by the Consultant at the request of the City. The key personnel for performance of this Agreement are as follows: PHILIP WRAGG.
3.2.5 C
ity’s Representative . The City hereby designates the City Manager, or his or her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement (“City’s Representative”). City’s Representative shall have the power to act on behalf of the City for all purposes under this Contract. The City Manager hereby designates COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR, or his or her designee, as the City’s contact for the implementation of the Services hereunder. Consultant shall not accept direction or orders from any person other than the City’s Representative or his or her designee.
3.2.6 C
onsultant’s Representative. Consultant hereby designates PHILIP WRAGG, or his or her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement (“Consultant’s Representative”). Consultant’s Representative shall have full authority to represent and act on behalf of the Consultant for all purposes under thi s Agreement. The Consultant’s Representative shall supervise and direct the Services, using his best skill and attention, and shall be responsible for all means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures and for the satisfactory coordination of all portions of the Services under this Agreement.
3.2.7 C
oordination of Services . Consultant agrees to work closely with City staff in the performance of Services and shall be available to City’s staff, consultants and other staff at all reasonable times.
33 60367.01100\33488377.1
- 4 -
3.2.8 Standard of Care; Performance of Employees. Consultant shall perform all Services under this Agreement in a skillful and competent manner, consistent with the standards generally recognized as being employed by professionals in the same discipline in the State of California. Consultant represent s and maintains that it is skilled in the professional calling necessary to perform the Services. Consultant warrants that all employees and subconsultants shall have sufficient skill and experience to perform the Services assigned to them. Finally, Consultant represents that it, its employees and subconsultants have all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to perform the Services and that such licenses and approvals shall be maintained throughout the term of this Agreement. As provided for in the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, Consultant shall perform, at its own cost and expense and without reimbursement from the City, any services necessary to correct errors or omissions which are caused by the Consultant’s failure to comply with the standard of care provided for herein. Any employee of the Consultant or its sub-consultants who is determined by the City to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Project, a threat to the safety of persons or property, or any employee who fails or refuses to perform the Services in a manner acceptable to the City, shall be promptly removed from the Project by the Consultant and shall not be re-employed to perform any of the Services or to work on the Project.
3.2.9 L
aws and Regulations . Consultant shall keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations in any manner affecting the performance of the Project or the Services, including all Cal/OSHA requirements, and shall give all notices required by law. Consultant shall be liable for all violations of such laws and regulations in connection with Services. If the Consultant performs any work knowing it to be contrary to such laws, rules and regulations, Cons ultant shall be solely responsible for all costs arising therefrom.
Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold City, its officials, directors, officers, employees and agents free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with such laws, rules or regulations.
3.2.10 I
nsurance.
3.2.10.1 Time for Compliance . Consultant shall not commence Work under this Agreement until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City that it has secured all insurance required under this section. In addition, Consultant shall not allow any subconsultant to commence work on any subcontract until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City that the subconsultant has secured all insurance required under this section.
3.2.10.2 T
ypes of Insurance Required . As a condition precedent to the effectiveness of this Agreement for work to be performed hereunder and without limiting the indemnity provisions of the Agreement, the Consultant in partial performance of its obligations under such Agreement, shall procure and maintain in full force and effect during the term of the Agreement, the following policies of insurance. If the existing policies do not meet the Insurance Requirements set forth herein, Consultant agrees to amend, supple ment or endorse the policies to do so.
(a) Commercial General Liability: Commercial General Liability Insurance which affords coverage at least as broad as Insurance 34 60367.01100\33488377.1
- 5 -
Services Office “occurrence” form CG 0001, with minimum limits of at least $1,000,000 per occurrence, and if written with an aggregate, the aggregate shall be double the per occurrence limit.
Defense costs shall be paid in addition to the limits.
The policy shall contain no endorsements or provisions limiting coverage for (1) contractual liability; (2) cross liability exclusion for claims or suits by one insured against another; or (3) contain any other exclusion contrary to the Agreement.
(b) Automobile Liability Insurance: Automobile Liability Insurance with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Form CA 0001 covering “Any Auto” (Symbol 1) with minimum limits of $1,000,000 each accident.
(c) Professional Liability: Professional Liability insurance with minimum limits of $1,000,000. Covered professional services shall specifically include all work to be performed under the Agreement and delete any exclusions that may potentially affect the wo rk to be performed (for example, any exclusions relating to lead, asbestos, pollution, testing, underground storage tanks, laboratory analysis, soil work, etc.).
If coverage is written on a claims- made basis, the retroactive date shall precede the effective date of the initial Agreement and continuous coverage will be maintained or an extended reporting period will be exercised for a period of at least three (3) years from termination or expiration of this Agreement.
(d) Workers’ Compensation: Workers’ Compensation Insurance, as required by the State of California and Employer’s Liability Insurance with a limit of not less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and disease.
3.2.10.3 Endorsements. Required insurance policies shall not be in compliance if they include any limiting provision or endorsement that has not been submitted to the City for approval.
(a) The policy or policies of insurance required by Section 3.2.10.2 (a) Commercial General Liability and (c) Contractor’s Pollution Liability shall be endorsed to provide the following:
(1) Additional Insured: The City of Aliso Viejo, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers shall be
additional insureds with regard to liability and defense of suits or claims arising out of the performance of the
Agreement.
35 60367.01100\33488377.1
- 6 -
Additional Insured Endorsements shall not (1) be restricted to “ongoing operations”; (2) exclude “contractual liability”; (3) restrict coverage to “sole” liability of Consultant; or (4) contain any other exclusions contrary to the Agreement. (2) Cancellation: Required insurance policies shall not be canceled or the coverage reduced until a thirty (30) day written notice of cancellation has been served upon the City except ten (10) days shall be allowed for non -payment of premium.
(b) The policy or policies of insurance required by Section 3.2.10.2 (b) Automobile Liability and (d) Professional Liability shall be endorsed to provide the following:
(1) Cancellation: Required insurance policies shall not be canceled or the coverage reduced until a thirty (30) day written notice of cancellation has been served upon the City except ten (10) days shall be allowed for non -payment of premium.
(c) The policy or policies of insurance required by Section 3.2.10.2 (e) Workers’ Compensation shall be endorsed to provide the following:
(1) Waiver of Subrogation: A waiver of subrogation stating that the insurer waives all rights of subrogation against the indemnified parties.
(2) Cancellation: Required insurance policies shall not be canceled or the coverage reduced until a thirty (30) day written notice of cancellation has been served upon the City except ten (10) days shall be allowed for non -payment of premium.
3.2.10.4 Primary and Non -Contributing Insurance . All insurance coverages shall be primary and any other insurance, deductible, or self-insurance maintained by the indemnified parties shall not contribute with this primary insurance. Policies shall contain or be endorsed to contain such provisions.
3.2.10.5 W aiver of Subrogation. Required insurance coverages shall not prohibit Consultant from waiving the right of subrogation prior to a loss. Consultant shall waive all subrogation rights against the indemnified parties. Policies shall contain or be endorsed to contain such provisions.
3.2.10.6 D
eductible . Any deductible or self -insured retention must be approved in writing by the City and shall protect the indemnified parties in the same manner and to the same extent as they would have been protected had the policy or policies not contained a deductible or self-insured retention.
36 60367.01100\33488377.1
- 7 -
3.2.10.7 Evidence of Insurance. The Consultant, concurrently with the execution of the Agreement, and as a condition precedent to the effectiveness thereof, shall deliver either certified copies of the required policies, or original certificates and endorsements on forms approved by the City. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy shall be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. At least fifteen (15 days) prior to the expiration of any such policy, evidence of insurance showing that such insurance coverage has been renewed or extended shall be filed with the City. If such coverage is cancelled or reduced, Consultant shall, within ten (10) days after receipt of written notice of such cancellation or reduction of coverage, file with the City evidence of insurance showing that the required insurance has been reinstated or has been provided through another insurance company or companies.
3.2.10.8 F
ailure to Maintain Coverage. Consultant agrees to suspend and cease all operations hereunder during such period of time as the required insurance coverage is not in effect and evidence of insurance has not been furnished to the City. The City shall have the right to withhold any payment due Consultant until Consultant has fully complied with the insurance provisions of this Agreement.
In the event that the Consultant’s operations are suspended for failure to maintain required insurance coverage, the Consultant shall not be entitled to an extension of time for completion of the Services because of production lost during suspension.
3.2.10.9 Acceptability of Insurers . Each such policy shall be from a company or companies with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VII and authorized to do business in the State of California, or otherwise allowed to place insurance through surplus line brokers under applicable provisions of the California Insurance Code or any federal law.
3.2.10.10 I
nsurance for Subconsultants. All Subconsultants shall be included as additional insureds under the Consultant’s policies, or the Consultant shall be responsible for causing Subconsultants to purchase the appropriate insurance in compliance with the terms of these Insurance Requirem ents, including adding the City as an Additional Insured to the Subconsultant’s policies.
3.2.11 S
afety . Consultant shall execute and maintain its work so as to avoid injury or damage to any person or property. In carrying out its Services, the Consultant shall at all times be in compliance with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regu lations, and shall exercise all necessary precautions for the safety of employees appropriate to the nature of the work and the conditions under which the work is to be performed. Safety precautions where applicable shall include, but shall not be l imited to: (A) adequate life protection and life saving equipment and procedures; (B) instructions in accident prevention for all employees and subconsultants, such as safe walkways, scaffolds, fall protection ladders, bridges, gang planks, confined space procedures, trenching and shoring, equipment and other safety devices, equipment and wearing apparel as are necessary or lawfully required to prevent accidents or injuries; and (C) adequate facilities for the proper inspection and maintenance of all safety measures.
3.3 Fees and Payments.
37 60367.01100\33488377.1
- 8 -
3.3.1 Compensation. Consultant shall receive compensation, including authorized reimbursements, for all Services rendered under this Agreement at the rates set forth in Exhibit “B” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The total compensation shall not exceed ONE HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($150,000) (“Total Compensation”) without written approval of City’s CITY MANAGER. Extra Work may be authorized, as described below, and if authorized, will be compensated at the rates and manner set forth in this Agreement.
3.3.2 Payment of Compensation.
Consultant shall submit to City a monthly itemized statement which indicates work completed and hours of Services rendered by Consultant. The statement shall describe the amount of Services and supplies provided since the initial commencement date, or since the start of the subsequent billing periods, as appropriate, through the date of the statement. City shall, within 45 days of receiving such statement, review the statemen t an d pay all non- disputed and approved charges thereon; provided, however, that if funds deposited with City by DEVELOPMENT APPLICANTS, as set forth in Paragraph 3.1.3 herein, are insufficient to pay such monthly statement, payment to Consultant shall not be made until such time as fun ds have been d eposited with City by DEVELOPMENT APPLICANTS to pay Consultant’s monthly statement.
3.3.3 Reimbursement for Expenses. Consultant shall not be reimbursed for any expenses unless authorized in writing by City.
3.3.4 Extra Work. At any time during the term of this Agreement, City may request that Consultant perform Extra Work. As used herein , "Ex tra Work" means any work which is determined by City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which the Parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at th e execution of this Agreement. Consultant shall not perform, nor be compensated for, Ex tra Work without written authorization from th e City.
3.3.5.1 Consultant is aware of the r equirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., (“Prevailing Wage Laws”), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requir ements on “public works” and “maintenance” projects. If th e Services are being performed as part of an applicable “public works” or “maintenance” project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. City shall provide Consultant with a copy of the prev ailing rates of per diem wages in effect at the commencement of this Agreement. Consultant shall make copies of th e prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the Services available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at the Consultant’ s principal place of business and at the project site. It is the intent of the parties to effectuate the requirements of sections 1771, 1774, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1813, and 1815 of the Labor Code within this Agreement, and Consultant shall therefore comply with such Labor Code sections to the fullest extent required by law. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected o fficials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleg ed failure to comply with the Prevailin g Wage Laws. 38 60367.01100\33488377.1
- 9 -
3.3.5.2 If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable “public works” or “maintenance” project, in addition to the foregoing, then pursuant to Labor Code sections 1725.5 and 1771.1, the Consultant and all subconsultants must be registered with the De partment of Industrial Relations (“DIR”). Consultant shall maintain registration for the duration of the project and require the same of any subconsultants. This project may also be subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the DIR. It shall be Contractor’s sole responsibility to comply with all applicable registration and labor compliance requirements, including the submission of payroll records directly to the DIR.
3.4 Accounting Records.
3.4.1 Mai
ntenance and Inspection . Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to all costs and expenses incurred under this Agreement. All such records shall be clearly identifiable. Consultant shall allow a representative of City during normal business hours to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to the Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment under this Agreement.
3.5 G
eneral Provisions.
3.5.1 T ermination of Agreement.
3.5.1.1 Grounds for Termination. City may, by written notice to Consultant, terminate the whole or any part of this Agreement at any time and without cause by giving written notice to Consultant of such termination, and specifying the effective date thereof, at least seven (7) days before the effective date of such termination. Upon termination, Consultant shall be compensated only for those services which have been adequately rendered to City, and Consultant shall be entitled to no further compensation. Consult ant may not terminate this Agreement except for cause. The rights and remedies of the City provided in this section shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law, equity or under this Agreement.
3.5.1.2 Effect of Termination .
If this Agreement is terminated as
provided herein, City may require Consultant to provide all finished or unfinished Documents and Data and other information of any kind prepared by Consultant in connection with the performance of Services under this Agreement. Consultant shall be required to provide such document and other information within fifteen (15) days of the request.
3.5.1.3 Additional Services. In the event this Agreement is terminated in whole or in part as provided herein, City may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as it may determine appropriate, services similar to those terminated.
3.5.2 Delivery of Notices. A
ll notices permitted or required under this Agreement
shall be given to the respective parties at the following address, or at such other address as the respective parties may provide in writing for this purpose:
Consultant:
39 60367.01100\33488377.1
- 10 -
STC TRAFFIC, INC.
5973 AVENIDA ENCINAS, SUITE 218
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
ATTN: PHILIP WRAGG
City:
City of Aliso Viejo
12 Journey, Suite 100
Aliso Viejo, CA 92656
Attn: SO KIM, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
Such notice shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed, forty- eight (48) hours after deposit in the U.S. Mail, first class postage prepaid and addressed to the party at its applicable address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate not ice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service.
3.5.3 Ownership of Materials and Confidentiality.
3.5.3.1 Documents & Data; Licensing of Intellectual Property . This Agreement creates a non -exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are pre pared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement (“Documents & Data”). Consultant shall require all subconsultants to agree in writing that City is granted a non-exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subconsultant prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were prepared by design professionals other than Consultant or provided to Consultant by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents and Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City’s sole risk.
3.5.3.2 C
onfidentiality . All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written information, and other Documents and Data either created by or provided to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement shall be held confidential by Consultant. Such materials shall not, without the prior written consent of City, be used by Consultant for any purposes other than the performance of the Services. Nor shall such materials be disclosed to any person or entity not connected with the performance of the Services or the Project. Nothing furnished to Consultant which is otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known, or has become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use City’s name or insignia, photographs of the Project, or any publicity pertaining to the Services or the Project in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other similar medium without the prior written consent of City.
40 60367.01100\33488377.1
- 11 -
3.5.3.3 Confidential Information. The City shall refrain from releasing Consultant’s proprietary information (“Proprietary Information”) unless the City’s legal counsel determines that the release of the Proprietary Information is required by the California Public Records Act or other applicable state or federal law, or order of a court of competent jurisdiction, in which case the City shall notify Consultant of its intention to release Proprietary Information.
Consultant shall have five (5) working days after receipt of the Release Notice to give City written notice of Consultant’s objection to the City’s release of Proprietary Information. Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, and its officers, directors, employees, and agents from and against all liability, loss, cost or expense (including attorney’s fees) arising out of a legal action brought to compel the release of Proprietary Information. City shall not release the Proprietary Information after receipt of the Objection Notice unles s either: (1) Consultant fails to fully indemnify, defend (with City’s choice of legal counsel), and hold City harmless from any legal action brought to compel such release; and/or (2) a final and non- appealable order by a court of competent jurisdiction requires that City release such information.
3.5.4 F
raud Policy. Consultant shall provide a copy of the City’s Fraud Prevention Policy to each of its employees assigned to perform Services under this Agreement. Consultant shall submit to the City a statement signed by an authorized representative for Consultant certifying receipt of the City’s Fraud Prevention Policy. A finding by the City that any of Consultant’s employees have committed fraud against the City or have violated the City’s Fraud Prevention Policy shall be grounds for appropriate discipline, up to and including such employee’s removal from performance of this Agreement at City’s request and/or termination of this Agreement.
Consultant shall reimburse the City for any costs and expenses associated with fraud against the City.
3.5.5 C
ooperation; Further Acts . The Parties shall fully cooperate with one another, and shall take any additional acts or sign any additional documents as may be necessary, appropriate or convenient to attain the purposes of this Agreement.
3.5.6 A
ttorney’s Fees. If either party commences an action against the other party, either legal, administrative or otherwise, arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to have and recover from the losing pa rty reasonable attorney’s fees and all other costs of such action.
3.5.7 In
demnification .
3.5.7.1 To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall defend (with counsel of City’s choosing), indemnify and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees, volunteers and agents free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liability, loss, damage or injury of any kind, in law or equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of, pertaining to, or incident to any alleged acts, errors or omissions, or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officials, officers, employees, subcontractors, consultants or agents in connection with the performance of the Consultant's Services, the Project or this Agreement, including without limitation the payment of all damages, expert witness fees and attorneys fees and other related costs and expenses except such loss or damage caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City. Consultant's obligation to indemnify shall survive expiration or termination of this Agreement and shall not be restricted to 41 60367.01100\33488377.1
- 12 -
insurance proceeds, if any, received by the Consultant or the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents or volunteers.
3.5.7.2 If Consultant’s obligation to defend, indemnify, and/or hold harmless arises out of Consultant’s performance as a “design professional” (as that term is defined under Civil Code section 2782.8), then, and only to the extent required by Civil Code section 2782.8, which is fully incorporated herein, Consultant’s indemnification obligation shall be limited to claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant, and, upon Consultant obtaining a final adjudication by a court of competent jurisdiction, Consultant’s liability for such claim, including the cost to defend, shall not exceed the Consultant’s proportionate percentage of fault.
3.5.8 Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior negotiations, understandings or agreements. This Agreement may only be modified by a writing signed by both parties.
3.5.9 G
overning Law . This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in Orange County.
3.5.10 T ime of Essence. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement.
3.6 C ity’s Right to Employ Other Consultants . City reserves right to employ other consultants in connection with this Project.
3.7 S uccessors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding on the successors and assigns of the parties.
3.8 A ssignment or Transfer. Consultant shall not assign, hypothecate, or transfer, either directly or by operation of law, this Agreement or any interest herein without the prior written consent of the City. Any attempt to do so shall be null and void, and any assignees, hypothecate s or transferees shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer.
3.9 C
onstruction; References; Captions. Since the Parties or their agents have participated fully in the preparation of this Agreement, the language of this Agreement shall be construed simply, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any Party. Any term referencing time, days or period for performance shall be deemed calendar days and not work days.
All references to Consultant include all personnel, employees, agents, and subconsultants of Consultant, except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. All references to City include its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. The captions of the various articles and paragraphs are for convenience and ease of reference only, and do not define, limit, augment, or describe the scope, content, or intent of this Agreement.
3.10 A
mendment; Modification . No supplement, modification, or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing and signed by both Parties. 42 60367.01100\33488377.1
- 13 -
3.11 Waiver. No waiver of any default shall constitute a waiver of any other default or breach, whether of the same or other covenant or condition. No waiver, benefit, privilege, or service voluntarily given or performed by a Party shall give the other Party any contractual rights by custom, estoppel, or otherwise.
3.12 N
o Third Party Beneficiaries. There are no intended third party beneficiaries of any right or obligation assumed by the Parties.
3.13 I nvalidity; Severability . If any portion of this Agreement is declared invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect.
3.14 P
rohibited Interests. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom.
3.15 E
qual Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subconsultant, employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex or age.
Such non- discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. Consultant shall also comply with all relevant provisions of City’s Minority Business Enterprise program, Affirmative Action Plan or other related programs or guidelines currently in effect or hereinafter enacted.
3.16 L
abor Certification . By its signature hereunder, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Worker’s Compensation or to undertake self -insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services.
3.17 A
uthority to Enter Agreement . Consultant has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement. Each Party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and bind each respective Party.
3.18 C
ounterparts . This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original.
3.19 D eclaration of Political Contributions . Consultant shall, throughout the term of this Agreement, submit to City an annual statement in writing declaring any political contributions 43 60367.01100\33488377.1
- 14 -
of money, in-kind services, or loan made to any member of the City Council within the previous twelve-month period by the Consultant and all of Consultant’s employees, including any employee(s) that Consultant intends to assign to perform the Services described in this Agreement.
3.20 Subcontracting.
3.20.1 Prior Approval Required . Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work required by this Agreement, except as expressly stated herein, without prior written approval of City. Subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement.
[Signatures on following page.]
44 60367.01100\33488377.1
- 15 -
SIGNATURE PAGE TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF ALISO VIEJO AND STC TRAFFIC, INC.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Professional Services Agreement on this ____ day of __________, 2025.
CITY OF ALISO VIEJO
Approved:
By:
Mitzi Ortiz
City Manager
ATTEST:
By: _______________________________
Janet Martinez
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________
Best Best & Krieger LLP
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO COMPLIANCE
WITH BUDGET
By:
Ann Eifert
Director of Financial Services
STC TRAFFIC, INC.
[If Corporation, TWO SIGNATURES,
Presid
ent OR Vice President AND Secretary
OR Treasurer REQUIRED]
By:
Its:
Printed Name:
By:
Its:
Printed Name:_________________________
Jason Stack
Sandra Sass
CFO
President
45 60367.01100\33488377.1
- 16 -
CITY OF ALISO VIEJO
DECLARATION OF POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS
Using the space provided below, please list any political contributions of money, in-kind services, or loans made to any member of the City Council within the last twelve (12) months by Consultant and all of Consultant’s employees, including any employee(s) that applicant intends to assign to perform the work or services described in this Agreement:
To the best of my knowledge, I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and was executed at:
City/County/State Date
Name of Business Print Name
Signature
NOTE: THIS DECLARATION IS INCLUDED AS PART OF THE AGREEMENT AND MUST BE SIGNED AND ATTACHED HERETO.
Carlbad/ San Diego/ CA
01/22/2025
STC Traffic, Inc.
Jason Stack, President
none 46
60367.01100\33488377.1
- 17 -
CITY OF ALISO VIEJO
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT OF FRAUD POLICY
I hereby acknowledge that I have received a copy of the City’s “Fraud Prevention Policy” dated October 1, 2008. I understand that I am to promptly read its contents and distribute copies to employees assigned to perform Services for the City of Aliso Viejo.
To the extent that provisions of this policy conflict with previously issued policies or practices, whether or not such policies and practices were contained in written policies, this policy shall prevail.
Name of Business Print Name
Signature
Date
STC Traffic, Inc.
Jason Stack, President
01/22/2025
47 City of Aliso Viejo
COUNCIL POLICY
SUBJECT
FRAUD PREVENTION POLICY
RES. NO.
2005-
056
POLICY NO.
400-15
EFF. DATE
10/01/2008
PAGE
1 of 8
PURPOSE
To establish Policy and procedures for the prev ention and detection of fraud and other related dishonest activities against th e City and, when appropriate, to pursue legal remedies available under the law.
This Policy has been established to ensure that elected officials, officers, employees, and members of advisory boards, commissions and committees of the City of Alis o Viejo are aware of the following:
1. Acts that are considered to be fraudulent;
2. Procedures for reporting suspected fraudulent acts;
3. Steps to be taken when fraud or other rela ted dishonest activities are suspected; and
4. Consequences to expect when a dishonest act is reported.
Further, this Policy delineates management’s responsibility for instituting and maintaining a system of internal control to prevent and detect fraud, misappropriations and other irregularities, and to be alert for any indications of such misconduct.
POLICY
1. GENERAL
The City of Aliso Viejo is committed to protecting its assets against the risk of loss or misuse.
Accordingly, it is the policy of the City to identify and promptly investig ate any possibility of fraudulent or related dishonest ac tivities against the City and, w hen appropriate, to pursue legal remedies available under law.
2. DEFINITIONS
a. Fraud
– Fraud and other similar irregularities including, but not limited to:
i. claim for reimbursement of expenses that are not job-related or authorized by current policy;
ii. forgery or unauthorized alteration of doc uments (checks, time sheets, independent contractor agreements, purchase orders, budgets, etc.); 48 City of Aliso Viejo
COUNCIL POLICY
SUBJECT
FRAUD PREVENTION POLICY
RES. NO.
2005-
056
POLICY NO.
400-15
EFF. DATE
10/01/2008
PAGE
2 of 8
iii. misappropriation of City assets (funds, securi ties, supplies, furniture, equipment, etc.);
iv. improprieties in the handling or reporting of money or financial transactions;
v. authorizing or receiving payment for goods not received or services not performed;
vi. computer-related activity involving unauthor ized alteration, destruction, forgery, or manipulation of data or misappropriation of City-owned software;
vii. misrepresentation of information on documents;
viii. any violation of Federal, State, or Local laws related to dishonest activities or fraud;
ix. seeking or accepting anything of material value from those doing business with the City, including vendors, consultants, contract ors, lessees, applicants, and grantees.
Materiality is determined by t he City’s Conflict of Interest Code, which incorporates the Fair Political Practices Commission’s regulations;
x. obtaining profit or personal ga in as a result of “insider” knowledge of City activities;
xi. disclosing confidential and proprietary information to outside parties; or
xii. Intentional, false representation or concealment of material fact for the purpose of personal gain.
b. Employee
– Any individual or group of individuals who receive co mpensation, either full or part-time, from the City of Alis o Viejo for employment or prov iding services. The term also includes any volunteer who provides services to the City through an official arrangement with the City or a City organization, as well as cons ultants, vendors, contra ctors, outside agencies and/or any other parties with a business relationship with the City of Aliso Viejo.
c. Official
- Elected officials, officers, and me mbers of advisory or appointed boards, commissions and committees.
d. Management – Any administrator, manager, director , supervisor, or other individual who manages or supervises funds or other resources, including human resources.
49 City of Aliso Viejo
COUNCIL POLICY
SUBJECT
FRAUD PREVENTION POLICY
RES. NO.
2005-
056
POLICY NO.
400-15
EFF. DATE
10/01/2008
PAGE
3 of 8
e. Internal Auditor – Any person or persons assigned by the City Manager to investigate any fraud or similar activity.
f. External Auditor – Independent audit prof essionals who perform annual audits of the City’s financial statements.
3. INVESTIGATION
a. It is the City’s intent to fu lly investigate any suspected acts of fraud. An objective and impartial investigation will be conducted regardless of the posit ion, title, length of service or relationship with the City of any party who mi ght be or become involv ed in or becomes the subject of such investigation.
b. Each department of the Ci ty is responsible for institut ing and maintain ing a system of internal control to provide r easonable assurance for the prev ention and detection of fraud.
Management should be familiar with the types of improprieties that might occur within their area of responsibility and be alert for any indications of such conduct.
c. The Internal Auditor, in conjunction with the City Attorney, has the primary responsibility for the investigation of fraud.
d. Throughout the investigation, the Internal Auditor will info rm the City Manager of pertinent investigative findings.
e. Employees will be gr anted “whistle-blower protection,” as described below when acting in accordance with this Policy. When informed of suspected fraud, neither the City nor any person acting on behalf of the City shall:
i. dismiss or threaten to dismiss the Employee reporting the suspected fraud;
ii. discipline, suspend, or th reaten to discipline or sus pend the Employee reporting the suspected fraud;
iii. impose any penalty upon the Employee reporting the suspected fraud, or;
iv. intimidate or coerce the Employ ee reporting the suspected fraud.
50 City of Aliso Viejo
COUNCIL POLICY
SUBJECT
FRAUD PREVENTION POLICY
RES. NO.
2005-
056
POLICY NO.
400-15
EFF. DATE
10/01/2008
PAGE
4 of 8
Violations of these “whistle-blower protections” may result in discipline up to and including dismissal.
f. Upon conclusion of the investigation, the results will be reported to the City Manager.
g. The City Manager, following review of investi gation results, will take appropriate disciplinary action regarding Employee misconduct. Discipl inary action can include termination of employment or a contract, and referral of the case to the District Attorney’s Office for possible prosecution.
h. The City will pursue every r easonable effort, including court or dered restitution, to obtain recovery of City losses from the offender, or other appropriate sources.
PROCEDURE
1. RESPONSIBILITIES OF OFFICIALS
a. If an Official has reason to su spect that a fraud has occurred, he or she shall immediately contact the City Manager.
b. An Official shall not attempt to investi gate the suspected fraud or discuss the matter with anyone other than the City Manager.
c. The alleged fraud or audit in vestigation shall not be di scussed with the media by any person other than through the City Manager in consultation with the City Attorney and the Internal Auditor.
2. MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITIES
a. Management is responsible for detecting, pr eventing and reporting frau d in their areas of responsibility.
b. Each manager should be familiar with the types of fraud t hat might occur in his or her area and be alert for any indication that fraud is or was in existence in his or her area.
c. When fraud is detected or suspected, M anagement should determine whether an error or mistake has occurred or if there may be dishonest or fraudulent activity.
51 City of Aliso Viejo
COUNCIL POLICY
SUBJECT
FRAUD PREVENTION POLICY
RES. NO.
2005-
056
POLICY NO.
400-15
EFF. DATE
10/01/2008
PAGE
5 of 8
d. If Management determines a suspected activity may involve fraud, they should contact their immediate supervisor. In the event the acti vity involves the immediate supervisor, the activity should be reported to the Department Director.
e. Upon being notified of su spected fraud, Department Direc tors shall inform the City Manager.
f. Management should not attempt to conduct in dividual investigations, interviews, or interrogations. However, Management is re sponsible for taking appropriate corrective actions to ensure adequate controls exist to prevent reoccurrences of fraud.
g. Management shall cooperate fully with the Inte rnal Auditor, other involved departments, and law enforcement agencies in the detection, reporting, and investigation of fraud, including the prosecution of offenders.
h. Management will have full and unrestricted access to all necessary records and personnel.
All City furniture and c ontents, including desks and computer s, are open to inspection at any time. There is no assumption of privacy.
i. In dealing with suspected fr aud, great care must be taken. Management should not:
i. make accusations;
ii. alert individuals suspected of committi ng fraud that an investigation is underway;
iii. treat individuals suspected of committing fraud unfairly, or;
iv. make statements that could lead to claims of false accusations or other offenses.
j. In handling suspected fraud activities , Management has the responsibility to:
i. make no contact (unless requested) with the individual suspected of committing fraud to determine facts or demand restitution. U nder no circumstances should there be any reference to “what you did”, “the crime”, “the fraud”, “the misappropriation”, etc.;
ii. avoid discussing the case, fa cts, suspicions, or allegations with anyone outside the City, unless specifically directed to do so by the City Attorney;
52 City of Aliso Viejo
COUNCIL POLICY
SUBJECT
FRAUD PREVENTION POLICY
RES. NO.
2005-
056
POLICY NO.
400-15
EFF. DATE
10/01/2008
PAGE
6 of 8
iii. avoid discussing the case with anyone in side the City other than the City Manager, Internal Auditor, or City Attorney or law enforcement personnel;
iv. direct all inquiries from the individual suspected of co mmitting fraud, or his or her representative, to the City M anager or City Attorney. All inquiries by an attorney representing the individual suspected of committing fraud should be directed to the City Attorney. All inquiries from the media should be directed to the City Manager, and;
v. take appropriate corrective and disciplinar y action, up to and including dismissal, if authorized by and in conformance with the City’s personnel policies.
3. EMPLOYEE RESPONSIBILITIES
a. Employees should report detected or sus pected fraud to the Employee’s supervisor.
b. In the event the suspected fraud involves the Employee’s immediate supervisor, the Employee shall make the report directly to the next higher level of Management and/or the City Manager.
c. The reporting Employee shall refr ain from further investigation of the incident, confrontation with the alleged violator, or further discussion of the incident with anyone, unless requested by the City Manager, Internal Auditor, City Attorney, or law enforcement personnel.
4. INTERNAL AUDITOR RESPONSIBILITIES
a. Upon assignment by the City Manager, the Inte rnal Auditor will promptly investigate the fraud.
b. In all circumstances wher e there appears to be reasonable gr ounds for suspecting that a fraud has taken place, the Internal Auditor, in consultation with the City Attorney, will contact appropriate law enforcement personnel.
c. The Internal Auditor shall be available and receptive to receiving relevant, confidential information to the extent allowed by law.
d. If evidence is uncovered showing possible fraud, the Internal Auditor will proceed as follows:
53 City of Aliso Viejo
COUNCIL POLICY
SUBJECT
FRAUD PREVENTION POLICY
RES. NO.
2005-
056
POLICY NO.
400-15
EFF. DATE
10/01/2008
PAGE
7 of 8
i. discuss the findings with Management and t he City Manager to dete rmine if disciplinary actions should be taken;
ii. report to the External Audito r such activities in order to assess the effect of the fraud activity on the City’s financial statements;
iii. coordinate with Managem ent regarding notification to insurers and filing of insurance claims;
iv. take immediate action, in consultation wit h the City Attorney, to prevent the theft, alteration, or destruction of evidentiary record s. Such action shall include, but is not limited to:
(A) removing the records and placing them in a secure location, or limiting access to the location where the records currently exist, and;
(B) preventing the individual suspected of committing the fraud from having access to the records.
e. In consultation with the City Attorney and appropriate law enforcement personnel, the Internal Auditor may disclose particulars of the investigation with potential witnesses if such disclosure would further the investigation.
f. If the Internal Auditor is contacted by the media regar ding an alleged fraud or investigation, the Internal Auditor will direct all inquiries to the City Manager.
g. At the conclusion of the in vestigation, the Internal Audito r will document the results in a confidential memorandum report to the City Manager and the City Attorney. If the report concludes that the allegations are supported by evidence, the report will be forwarded to appropriate law enforcement personnel.
h. Unless exceptional circumstances exist, a per son under investigation for fraud is to be given notice in writing of essent ial particulars of t he allegations following the conclusion of the investigation. Where not ice is given, the person agains t whom allegations are being made may submit a written expl anation to the Internal Auditor no later than seven (7) calendar days after notice is received.
i. The Internal Auditor shall make recomm endations to the appropria te department for 54 City of Aliso Viejo
COUNCIL POLICY
SUBJECT
FRAUD PREVENTION POLICY
RES. NO.
2005-
056
POLICY NO.
400-15
EFF. DATE
10/01/2008
PAGE
8 of 8
assistance in the prevention of future similar occurrences. j. Upon completion of the investigation, including all legal and personnel actions, all records, documents, and other evidentiary materi al, obtained from the department under investigation will be returned by the Internal Auditor to that department.
DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS
Any Employee found to be responsible for fraud or who knowingly makes false allegations in violation of this Policy shall be subject to a ppropriate disciplinary action, up to and including termination of employment and/or te rmination of the contract. Th e severity of the disciplinary action will be based upon the circumstances of t he violation and in accordance with the City’s personnel policies. The City will assess any re medial measures necessary to address and correct the circumstance and pr event reoccurrence in the futu re. Remedial measures may include, but are not limited to, disciplinary action, reorganizati on of personnel, training and education, counseling and/or other employee assistance.
EXCEPTIONS
There will be no exceptions to this Policy unle ss provided and approved by the City Manager and the City Attorney.
55 60367.01100\33488377.1
A-1
EXHIBIT “A”
SCOPE OF SERVICES
56 10
STC Traffic, Inc. | City of Aliso Viejo - Peer Review Services for Traffic Studies Project Approach
A key element of permitting land development
projects involves reviewing traffic studies for
potential impacts to Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)
to ensure compliance with CEQA and non-CEQA
requirements related to Level of Service (LOS)
for the operation of the local roadway network.
STC is well-versed in understanding VMT analysis
and the requirements established by SB 743
through the State of California Governor’s Office
of Planning and Research. We have updated
TIA guidelines for numerous local agencies to
include VMT as the new metric for assessing
project-specific transportation impacts for
CEQA compliance. STC is familiar with the City’s
Transportation Impact Guidelines for CEQA
and General Plan Consistency (May 2020),
including requirements for Local Transportation
Assessments (Non-CEQA) involving roadway and
intersection operations.
We understand the roles and context for each
of these reviews. This includes navigating the
important difference between VMT analysis
(for CEQA requirements) and traffic operations
analysis (for roadway system safety, performance,
maintenance, and capacity needs). Our staff will
work with the City and the applicant to develop
solutions where impacts are identified.
Part of the process is being readily available for
meetings with City staff and the applicant to
clarify comments and/or resolve design issues.
We steer these conversations into a collaborative
process. Our goal is to help expedite these
reviews to keep the permit process moving
forward while ensuring adherence to engineering
standards. We understand the level of pressure
that City staff are put under to manage and
facilitate land development reviews. Many of
these projects provide significant economic value
to the City and ongoing tax revenues.
Our staff have a unique understanding having
worked at the highest levels of local government,
including STC’s QA/QC Manager, David DiPierro,
who served as the City Traffic Engineer for the
City of Oceanside. We’ve applied this intimate
knowledge to our approach to managing on-
call contracts and have trained our staff on the
importance of responsive communications.
Scope of Work
STC will provide peer review services as- needed
for various traffic and transportation submittals,
including Level of Service studies, Vehicle
Miles Traveled studies, Parking studies and
other documentation as requested by the City.
Studies will be compared with the requirements
of the City of Aliso Viejo Transportation
Impact Guidelines for CEQA and General Plan
Consistency (May 2020) as well as with County
and State guidelines where it is deemed
appropriate.
Project Manager, Philip Wragg, AICP , will be
directly responsible for handling day-to-day
activities for the contract. STC will take part
in coordination meetings with City staff and
applicant’s consultants as well as attend, and
present at Planning Commission and City Council
meetings upon request.
Review letters will include a request to provide
response to comments, which will be reviewed
with subsequent submittals if provided. Typically,
three reviews are required before documentation
is approved.
57 60367.01100\33488377.1
C-1
EXHIBIT “B”
COMPENSATION
In the event that this Agreement is renewed pursuant to Section 3.1.2, the rates set forth above may be adjusted each year at the time of renewal in accordance with the annual average Consumer Price Index of the prior calendar year, All Urban Consumers, Los Angeles-Long Beach- Anaheim up to a maximum percentage of five percent (5%). 58 15
STC Traffic, Inc. | City of Aliso Viejo - Peer Review Services for Traffic Studies Cost Proposal
STC’s detailed fee schedule is provided in the table below. It includes hourly rates for all classifications.
STC Traffic is a local business and there are no direct costs for mileage.
Outsourced reimbursable expenses such as printing and reproduction, deliveries and overnight shipping, computerized plotting, materials, etc., will be charged to the client at the consultant’s cost without mark-up.
Hourly Rates
Executive/Management Classifications
Principal-In-Charge $290
Senior Principal Manager $270
Principal Manager $260
Senior Project Manager $240
Project Manager III $220
Project Manager II $210
Project Manager I $200
Professional Engineering Classifications
Principal Engineer $230
Senior Project Engineer $210
Project Engineer III $190
Project Engineer II $160
Project Engineer I $140
Professional Planning Classifications
Principal Planner $200
Senior Project Planner $180
Project Planner III $170
Project Planner II $140
Project Planner I $120
Hourly Rates
Technical/Specialized Classifications
Senior Systems Engineer/Technical Specialist $220
Systems Engineer / Technical Specialist III $200
Systems Engineer / Technical Specialist II $170
Systems Engineer / Technical Specialist I $150
Construction Manager $240
Senior Construction Engineer/Inspector $220
Construction Engineer/Inspector III $190
Construction Engineer/Inspector II $160
Construction Engineer/Inspector I $140
Senior Drafter $160
Drafter III $150
Drafter II $130
Drafter I $110
Other Classifications
Intern $100
Expert Witness $400
59 City of Aliso Viejo
AGENDA ITEM
DATE: February 5, 2025
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: So Kim, Community Development Department
SUBJECT: STATUS UPDATE ON DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NEGOTIATIONS Recommended Action:
Receive and file.
Discussion:
Recently, several new development projects have been submitted to the City, necessitating development agreements (DAs) due to amendments to the general plan and zoning designations. A DA is a contract between the City and the developer, outlining conditions, terms, restrictions, and regulations for the development project. It ensures that the property owner can implement and operate the project without changes to the imposed conditions after approval. The DA may include fees, such as park in-lieu fees, to mitigate impacts on parks, schools, traffic, etc.
To negotiate the DA terms, the City Council directed Staff to collaborate with a third-party consultant, Kosmont & Associates (Kosmont), to work with the Applicant and report on progress. Below is a list of pending projects and the status of DA negotiations:
Avalon Bay at The Commons: A draft DA has been prepared. However, Staff anticipates renegotiating the terms as the Applicant is redesigning the project to address the City Council’s previous concerns.
26800-26970 Aliso Viejo Parkway: A formal application has yet to be submitted.
Once submitted, DA negotiations will begin.
95 Argonaut: A kickoff meeting has been completed. The Applicant is preparing information for Kosmont to conduct a fiscal impact analysis. 400-600 Freedom Lane: A kickoff meeting has been completed. The Applicant is preparing information for Kosmont to conduct a fiscal impact analysis. 60 City of Aliso Viejo
AGENDA ITEM
DATE: February 5, 2025
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: So Kim, Community Development Director
Michael Delgadillo, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A 748 SQUARE FOOT ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT WITH A 668 SQUARE FOOT ATTACHED GARAGE THAT EXCEEDS THE HEIGHT LIMIT OF 25’ (27’ PROPOSED) AT 25 ALISAL COURT (USE-2024-00012).
Recommended Action:
Adopt a Resolution approving a Conditional Use Permit to construct a 748 square foot accessory dwelling unit with a 668 square foot attached garage that exceeds the height limit of 25 feet (27 feet proposed) at 25 Alisal Court (USE-2024-00012).
Fiscal Impact:
None.
Background:
On November 4, 2024, Bob Bunyan (“Applicant”) submitted an application, requesting to construct a 748 square foot accessory dwelling unit (“ADU”) with a 668 square foot attached garage at 25 Alisal Court. The proposed ADU is proposed along the south side yard area of the property. A deck is proposed to the north facade of the ADU that would connect the upper floor of the ADU to the existing residence. The ADU is designed to match the architectural style, color, and materials of the existing residence. 61
Image 1. Project site facing west. Image 2. Aerial Image of Vicinity Discussion:
California Government Code Section 66317 states that permit applications for ADUs shall be considered and approved ministerially without discretionary review or a hearing.
However, any proposed ADU which does not conform to the objective standards of the City’s ADU ordinance may be allowed with a Conditional Use Permit (“ CUP”). The proposed ADU exceeds the height limit imposed by AVMC 15.14.080(H)(2)(d), which states that an ADU that is attached to the primary dwelling may not exceed 25 feet in height or the height limitation imposed by the underlying zone that applies to the primary dwelling, whichever is lower. Since the height limit for the primary dwelling unit is 35 feet per the Glenwood Specific Plan, the maximum allowed height for the proposed ADU is 25 feet. Additionally, the applicant is re questing a deviation from a window requirement, which is detailed further in Finding No. 4 below.
Pursuant to Aliso Viejo Municipal Code (“AVMC”) Section 15.14.080 (Accessory Dwelling Units), any proposed ADU that does not conform to all objective standards requires an approval of a CUP, subject to the following findings of approval established in AVMC Section 15.74.040.
1. Consistency with General Plan. The land use is consistent with the general plan and any applicable specific plan.
In 2004, t he Glenwood Specific Plan was adopted, consistent with the General Plan, for the development of the larger Aliso Viejo Resort and Golf Club. The Glenwood Specific Plan permits, among other developments, single-family dwellings with ADUs. Additionally, AVMC 15.14.080 deems ADU developments consistent with the allowable density for the lot . As no changes are proposed to the existing residential land use, this finding can be made.
2. Consistency with Zoning Code. The land use and associated development conform to the permitted use provisions and development standards of this zoning code and are consistent with this code and any applicable specific plan.
62
As previously mentioned, the Glenwood Specific Plan permits the development of ADUs. The ADU with the attached garage is compliant with the minimum required setbacks, interior dimensions (20’ by 20’), and lot coverage as set forth in the Glenwood Specific Plan and AVMC 15.14.080, except for the overall building height. The proposed 27’ tall ADU exceeds the Code required 25’ height limit (AVMC 15.14.080(H)(2)(d)). The Applicant is requesting a 2’ increase in the overall building height to accommodate a garage ceiling height of 11.55’. The property owners are professional stunt car drivers, and they are requesting a higher garage ceiling to install vehicle lifts for additional storage and security. While the proposed building height is taller than 25’, it will remain shorter than the existing primary residence, which conforms with the Glennwood Specific Plan allowed maximum height of 35’. As the property is located at the end of the street, with the ADU positioned against a non-residential property and away from other neighboring residential properties, most of the building will be screened by the existing residence, except for the front facade. Also, the proposed ADU matches the architectural style, color, and material of the primary residence. The proposed ADU complies with the Glenwood Specific Plan in that the entry is oriented towards the street, front setback is consistent with the primary residence, balcony defuses direct effect of sunlight to the lower floor, and includes roofline variations and facade articulations, and covered outdoor spaces to reduce the apparent mass.
For these reasons, the proposed ADU is consistent with the zoning code and the Glenwood Specific Plan and therefore, this finding can be made.
3. Compliance with CEQA. Processing and approval of the permit application are in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act.
The proposed use is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (New Construction of Small Structures, Section 15303) as the proposal consists of the construction of small accessory structures, and therefore, this finding can be made.
4. Surrounding Uses. Approval of the application will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare or injurious to or incompatible with other properties or land uses in the vicinity.
As discussed in Finding No. 2 above, the proposed ADU will be compatible with the surrounding uses as it will be positioned against a non-residential property and away from other neighboring residential properties; matches the primary residence in orientation, materials, architectural style, and color; and includes design elements to visually break the mass and scale of the building. Thus, the 2’ increase to the overall height will not create conditions materially detrimental to adjacent properties. In addition to the 2’ building height increase, the Applicant is requesting to deviate from the following window regulation set forth in AVMC
15.14.080(I)(7)(E): all windows located less than 30’ from a property line that is not a public right-of-way must utilize obscure glass. The intent of this regulation is to 63
minimize privacy impact on other properties. The Applicant is requesting to use non-obscure glass for all windows, except for bathroom windows. The windows located at the front facade face a public street and this regulation does not apply.
The windows located along the south side facade faces a row of trees in front of a parking lot of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. The windows located along the north side façade faces the existing primary residence. The windows to the rear facade face a slope. Due to the location of the ADU, none of the proposed windows will cause privacy impacts to adjacent properties. Therefore, the proposed 2’ increase in overall building height and the use of non-obscure windows will not cause materially detrimental impacts to surrounding properties and this finding can be made.
Public Notice:
On January 16, 2025, a public notice was published in the Laguna Niguel News and mailed to all property owners within 300’ of the subject site. No public comments were received in response.
Attachments:
1. Resolution
2. Proposed Plans
3. Applicant’s Letter
3.1. Letter from AVCA
4. Presentation
64 60367.01460\34673878.3
Attachment 1
RESOLUTION NO. 2025- ____
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALISO
VIEJO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A 748 SQUARE FOOT ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT
WITH A 668 SQUARE FOOT ATTACHED GARAGE THAT EXCEEDS
THE HEIGHT LIMIT OF 25 FEET (27 FEET PROPOSED) AT 25 ALISAL
COURT AND FINDING THE PROJECT CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT
FROM CEQA (USE-2024-00012)
WHEREAS, on December 4, 2024, the Applicant, Bob Bunyan, representing Samuel Hubinette, submitted an application for a request to construct an accessory dwelling unit with an attached garage that exceeds the height limit of 25 feet (27 feet proposed) at 25 Alisal Court (“Project”); and
WHEREAS, on January 16, 2025, a public notice of the public hearing was published in the Laguna Niguel News and mailed to all property owners within 300 feet of the subject site; and
WHEREAS, on February 5, 2025, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law and considered public testimony and evidence and recommendations presented by staff in the agenda report and oral presentation; and WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALISO VIEJO, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: Determination of Recitals. The City Council hereby finds and determines that all the recitals set forth above are true and correct. The above recitals are hereby incorporated as substantive findings of this Resolution.
Section 2: Approval of Project and Findings for Conditional Use Permit. In accordance with AVMC 15.74.040(D), the City Council hereby makes the following findings of fact and approves a Conditional Use Permit (USE-2024-00012) for the request to construct an accessory dwelling unit that exceeds the height limit of 25 feet (27 feet proposed), subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit “A” and project plans set forth in Exhibit “B”, which are both attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
1. Consistency with General Plan. The land use is consistent with the general plan and any applicable specific plan. In 2004, the Glenwood Specific Plan was adopted, consistent with the General Plan, for the development of the larger Aliso Viejo Resort and Golf Club. The Glenwood Specific Plan permits, among other developments, single-family dwellings with ADUs. Additionally, AVMC
15.14.080 deems ADU developments consistent with the allowable density for the lot.
65 60367.01460\34673878.3 Page 2 of 7
2. Consistency with Zoning Code. The land use and associated development conform to the permitted use provisions and development standards of this zoning code and are consistent with this code and any applicable specific plan.
The Glenwood Specific Plan permits the development of ADUs. The ADU with the attached garage is compliant with the minimum required setbacks, interior dimensions (20’ by 20’), and lot coverage as set forth in the Glenwood Specific Plan and AVMC 15.14.080, except for the overall building height. The proposed 27’ tall ADU exceeds the Code required 25’ height limit (AVMC
15.14.080(H)(2)(d)). The Applicant is requesting a 2’ increase in the overall building height to accommodate a garage ceiling height of 11.55’. The property owners are professional stunt car drivers, and they are requesting a higher garage ceiling to install vehicle lifts for additional storage and security. While the proposed building height is taller than 25’, it will remain shorter than the existing primary residence, which conforms with the Glenwood Specific Plan allowed maximum height of 35’. As the property is located at the end of the street, with the ADU positioned against a non-residential property and away from other neighboring residential properties, most of the building will be screened by the existing residence, except for the front facade. Also, the proposed ADU matches the architectural style, color, and material of the primary residence. The proposed ADU complies with the Glenwood Specific Plan in that the entry is oriented towards the street, front setback is consistent with the primary residence, balcony defuses direct effect of sunlight to the lower floor, and includes roofline variations and facade articulations, and covered outdoor spaces to reduce the apparent mass.
3. Compliance with CEQA. Processing and approval of the permit application are in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. The proposed use is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (New Construction of Small Structures, Section 15303) as the proposal consists of the construction of small accessory structures.
4. Surrounding Uses. Approval of the application will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare or injurious to or incompatible with other properties or land uses in the vicinity.
The proposed ADU will be compatible with the surrounding uses as it will be positioned against a non-residential property and away from other neighboring residential properties; matches the primary residence in orientation, materials, architectural style, and color; and includes design elements to visually break the mass and scale of the building. Thus, the 2’ increase to the overall height will not create conditions materially detrimental to adjacent properties. In addition to the 2’ building height increase, the Applicant is requesting to deviate from the following window regulation set forth in AVMC 15.14.080(I)(7)(E): all windows located less than 30’ from a property line that is not a public right-of- way must utilize obscure glass. The intent of this regulation is to minimize privacy impact on other properties. The Applicant is requesting to use non- 66 60367.01460\34673878.3 Page 3 of 7
obscure glass for all windows, except for bathroom windows. The windows located at the front facade face a public street and this regulation does not apply. The windows located along the south side facade face a row of trees in front of a parking lot of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. The windows located along the north side façade face the existing primary residence. The windows to the rear façade face a slope. Due to the location of the ADU, none of the proposed windows will cause privacy impacts to adjacent properties.
Section 3: Filing of Notice of Exemption. The City Council hereby authorizes and directs staff to prepare, execute and file with the Orange County Clerk a Notice of Exemption for the proposed project.
Section 4: Location of Documents. The administrative record for the Project is maintained at City Hall located at 12 Journey, Suite 100, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656. The custodian of records is the City Clerk.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of February 2025. _____________________________
Tiffany Ackley
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
_____________________________ _____________________________ Scott C. Smith, City Attorney Janet Martinez, City Clerk 67 60367.01460\34673878.3 Page 4 of 7
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ALISO VIEJO )
I, JANET MARTINEZ, City Clerk of the City of Aliso Viejo, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that foregoing Resolution No. 2025-___ was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Aliso Viejo at their regular meeting held on the 5th day of February, 2025, by the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
___________________________
JANET MARTINEZ
CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
68 60367.01460\34673878.3 Page 5 of 7
EXHIBIT “A”
Conditions of Approval
25 Alisal Court (USE-2024-00012)
1. Project Description. This approval permits the construction of a 27’ tall, 748 square foot accessory dwelling unit (“ADU”) with a 668 square foot attached garage. The ADU shall provide permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking, and sanitation.
2. Parking. One off-street parking space is required for the ADU.
3. Setback. The following minimum setbacks shall apply: 10’ front and 4’ side- and rear- setbacks.
4. Lot Coverage. Total lot coverage of the lot shall not exceed 75 percent.
5. Fire Sprinklers. Fire sprinklers approved by Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA), are required in an ADU if sprinklers are required in the primary residence when constructed.
6. Rental Term. The ADU shall not be rented for a term that is shorter than 30 consecutive days.
7. No Separate Conveyance. An ADU or JADU may be rented, but, except as otherwise provided in Government Code Section 66341, no ADU or JADU may be sold or otherwise conveyed separately from the lot and the primary dwelling (in the case of a single-family lot) or from the lot and all of the dwellings (in the case of a multifamily lot).
8. Development Per Approved Plans. This approval constitutes a precise plan for the location and design of uses, structures, features, and materials submitted with this application. Development shall occur substantially as shown on the plans approved by this Project and set forth in Exhibit B, subject to any modifications imposed by the conditions of approval herein, as confirmed by the Director of Community Development. Any land use, construction, or improvement not specifically approved by this conditional use permit and site development permit is not permitted and must be addressed in a separate and subsequent application and review. Relocation, alteration or addition to any use, structure, feature or material not specifically approved shall require an amendment to the approved plans unless the Director of Community Development determines such modifications are minor and consistent with the spirit and intent of the original approving action, and that the action would have been the same for the modifications as for the approved plans. The Director of Community Development may approve such minor modifications in accordance with AVMC Section
15.74.110.
69 60367.01460\34673878.3 Page 6 of 7
9. Payments of Fees. The Applicant and Applicant's successors in interest shall be responsible for payment of all applicable fees along with reimbursement for all City expenses in ensuring compliance with these conditions.
10.Compliance with Conditions. The Applicant shall be fully responsible for knowing and complying with all conditions of approval, including making conditions known to City staff for future governmental permits or actions on the project site. Failure to abide by and faithfully comply with any and all conditions attached to granting these permits may constitute grounds for revocation of the permit(s) in accordance with AVMC Section 15.74.120. This Resolution and Conditions of Approval shall be incorporated into building plans to all applicable reviewing agencies or authorities.
11.Compliance with City Codes. The approved project shall comply with all applicable provisions of the municipal code, including but not limited to provisions of building codes, Glenwood Specific Plan, and any conditions imposed as part of the approval process.
12.Fire Safety and Prevention. The Applicant is responsible for compliance with all applicable fire prevention standards and permits.
13.Materials and Colors. The materials and colors of the exterior walls and roof must match those of the primary dwelling.
14.Roof Slope. The roof slope must match that of the dominant roof slope of the primary dwelling. The dominant roof slope is the slope shared by the largest portion of the roof.
15.Exterior Lighting. The exterior lighting must be designed or shielded to direct lights downward or as otherwise required by the building or fire code.
16.Exterior Entrance. The ADU must have an independent exterior entrance, apart from that of the primary dwelling.
17.Placement of Mechanical Equipment. Mechanical equipment may not be placed within four feet of an adjacent property.
18.Indemnification. The Applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold the city, and/or any of its officials (appointed or elected), officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, harmless from any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, writs of mandamus, and other actions and proceedings (whether legal, equitable, declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature), and alternative dispute resolution procedures (including, but not limited to arbitrations, mediations, and other such procedures), judgments, orders, and decisions (collectively 'Actions'), brought against the city, and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that 70 60367.01460\34673878.3 Page 7 of 7
challenge, attack, or seek to modify, set aside, void, or annul, any action of, or any permit or approval issued by the city and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof (including actions approved by the voters of the city) for or concerning the project, whether such Actions are brought under the Ralph M. Brown Act, California Environmental Quality Act, Planning and Zoning Law, Subdivision Map Act, Community Redevelopment Law, Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1085 or 1094.5, or any other federal, state, or local constitution, statute, law, ordinance, charter, rule, regulation, or any decision of a court of competent jurisdiction. It is expressly agreed the city shall have the right to approve, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, legal counsel providing the city's defense, and that Applicant shall reimburse city for any costs and expenses directly and necessarily incurred by the city in the course of the defense. The city shall promptly notify the Applicant of any action brought, and city shall cooperate with the Applicant in defense of the action.
19.Actions by City Council. Decisions by the city council are final and shall become effective immediately except as otherwise provided in the approving action and except for actions by ordinance.
20.Expiration. This approval shall expire and be of no further force or effect if:
a. Expiration of Period of Validity. The permit is not established within two years of the permit’s effective date, or such other time period designated by the permit approval, by state law, or by this code; or
b. Abandonment. After establishment, the use or activity for which the permit was approved is discontinued or abandoned for a period of one year.
21.Time Extensions. Upon application before expiration of the period of validity, the original decision-making authority may grant or conditionally grant an extension to the period of validity for up to one year per extension if it finds that such an extension is justified by the circumstances of the original findings for the project can still be made with, if necessary, the imposition of conditions not originally imposed on the project. The filing of an application for extension shall stay expiration of the permit until action is taken on the time extension by the decision- making authority. No more than two one-year extensions may be granted or conditionally granted.
22.Revocation. This approval may be revoked by the original decision-making authority pursuant to the provisions of AVMC 15.74.120. 71 72
73 74
75 76
77 78
79 80
81 82
83 84
85 86
87 88
89 90
91 92
93 94
95 Accessory Dwelling Unit
25 Alisal Court
USE-2024-00012
City Council
February 5, 2025
96 2
Proposal and Site Plan
• A proposed two-story structure:
o A 668 SF garage, storage area,
sauna, and covered patio on the
first floor
o A 748 SF ADU with an attached
balcony, and deck connecting to the
existing residence
97 3
First Floor Second Floor 98
4 99
5 South, North, and West
Elevations
100
Staff Recommendation to City Council:
Adopt a Resolution approving Conditional Use Permit
to construct a 748 square foot accessory dwelling unit
with a 688 square foot attached garage that exceeds
the height limit of 25' (27' proposed) at 25 Alisal Court (USE-2024-00012).
6101
60367.01100\34434765.2
City of Aliso Viejo
AGENDA ITEM
DATE: February 5, 2025
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Shaun Pelletier, Director of Public Works/City Engineer SUBJECT: PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT AND CONDITION ANALYSIS
Recommended Action:
Receive Staff presentation.
Fiscal Impact:
There is no fiscal impact for this report.
Background:
Since the City’s incorporation in 2001, staff has evaluated public streets and annually prepared a 7-year capital improvement project (CIP) list and a biannual pavement management program (PMP) including a pavement condition index (PCI) evaluation to meet OCTA Measure M eligibility requirements. These are utilized to prioritize maintenance and capital projects with the funding available to extend pavement life. Since Aliso Viejo is the youngest incorporated Orange County city, the streets are also relatively young. Most of the residential areas were developed prior to incorporation, between 1984 and 2001. The main arterial streets date back to the late 70s.
Asphalt pavements are typically designed to last 20-30 years, and with proper maintenance can last much longer. Preventive maintenance generally includes 2 categories: Slurry Seal and Asphalt Overlay. Slurry seal is a low cost ($0.50/SF) maintenance tool that extends pavement life by reducing the oxidation caused by the sun.
Oxidation causes asphalt to become brittle and therefore deteriorate. Slurry seal can be viewed as a sunscreen for pavements. This surface treatment is considered effective for 5-10 years, and the city has had a regular slurry seal program in place since 2002, reoccurring on a 5-7 year cycle.
Since slurry seal is not a structural improvement, at times the wearing course of a pavement needs to be replaced. This is achieved with a midrange cost ($5.50/SF) asphalt overlay that is typically 2-3 inches thick. Depending on the existing condition, the street 102
60367.01100\34434765.2
will be fully or partially milled before applying this overlay. This method is generally considered to provide 10-20 years of additional life.
When the pavement condition becomes too deteriorated for either method to be successful, a mid to high cost ($10/SF) full street reconstruction is required. Enterprise recently utilized this method for a small segment, but no other city streets have required this to date. This cost can grow 2-3 times larger if the concrete curb and gutter and drainage systems also need to be replaced.
The funding sources available for street maintenance and capital projects include Gas Tax, OCTA Measure M, and most recently SB1 Gas Tax. Grant funds for pavement maintenance are not readily available, but staff has been successful in obtaining them when the opportunity exists. Annual revenue amounts do vary, but the FY 2024-25 budget anticipated the following.
Gas Tax $1,407,500
SB1 Gas Tax $1,330,000
Measure M $1,000,000
Most of the Gas Tax funds are expended on normal operations and maintenance such as minor street and sidewalk repairs, storm drain cleaning, street sweeping, traffic signal operation and repair, median landscaping, and streetlight electric utility costs. The remaining revenues from the 3 sources are applied towards capital improvement projects or held in reserves for emergency purposes. For reference, actual recent CIP expenditures are shown below.
FY 20-21 $2,327,098
FY 21-22 $1,500,043
FY 22-23 $2,897,938
FY 23-24 $1,169,244
FY 24-25 Budget $2,972,710
Discussion:
Council previously requested a pavement analysis that went beyond the typical PCI evaluation completed biannually for OCTA Measure M requirements. This request was based on a concern some street segments may not have been built to acceptable standards prior to incorporation. More specifically, we have found that some streets were constructed with asphalt directly on subgrade (compacted earth) rather than an aggregate base layer. Both methods can be acceptable, depending on the thickness of the asphalt layer.
Staff contracted with geotechnical consultant GMU to complete a citywide evaluation of the pavement structure conditions. Testing included pavement cores to determine asphalt thickness and if aggregate base existed, as well as deflection testing. The result was a two-phase report indicating conditions and rehabilitation recommendations based upon 103
60367.01100\34434765.2
both the PCI report and the structural findings. The report and PCI will each be used to prioritize projects and determine the rehabilitation methods in upcoming years.
The summary of the structural report does conclude that overall, the city’s pavement system is in good condition and should remain in good condition with the ongoing pavement management strategies already in place. The main obstacle will always be funding, particularly with costs continuing to rise faster than revenues. Per the latest PMP, we are projected to need about $2.34 million per year to maintain or slightly increase the PCI which is currently 82. At current estimated funding levels of about $1.91 million per year the PCI is projected to drop to 80 after 7 years. It is important to maintain the PCI at 75 or above both to ensure that the pavement system remains in good condition, but also because certain Measure M competitively funded projects have a 10% reduced matching amount with an average of at least 75. The City has always set 80 as the goal to be met and will continue to strive to meet it.
Public streets are considered the largest asset the city owns and therefore will continue to be a priority to maintain at the highest level possible. The tools and programs we have in place have been successful, and they will be evaluated along with revenue sources as time moves on and the city streets age to ensure continued success.
Attachment:
1. Presentation
2. Phase 1 Pavement Report
3. Phase 2 Pavement Report
104
Pavement Condition and
Practices Overview
February 5th, 2025
105
Presentation Outline
2 Findings and
Recommendations
Is the pavement condition
at risk? What is being done to monitor, design,
and improve the roadway network?
106
Service Life of Pavement
3 107
City’s Proactive Approach
• Pavement Management Plan
Network Level Pavement Evaluation
Bird’s eye view
Good tool for planning, budgeting, scheduling
• Pavement Evaluation and Improvement
Project Level Pavement Evaluation
Detailed Focus on Areas Due for Improvement
Coring
Deflection Testing
Optimized Improvement Recommendations
• Construction Inspection and Testing
4 108
2024 Pavement Conditions Map
5 • Approximately 72.2 Centerline
Miles
• More than 15 Million SF
• Average PCI of 82
MPAH has a PCI of 79
Local streets has a PCI of 85
• Neighboring Cities
Laguna Niguel: 78 (2024)
Newport Beach: 81 (2024)
San Clemente: 88 (2023)
Irvine: 86 (2022)
City of Aliso Viejo
Network
109
6 Maintenance and
Rehabilitation Plan
110
Pavement
Evaluation and
Improvement
7 Phase 2Phase 1
111
Pavement Cores
8 Phase 2Phase 1
112
Pavement Deflection
Testing Data Map
9 • 7% of the entire network needed
additional investigation
24% of those streets were structurally
inadequate
113
Findings
• Aggregate Base Influence:
-As long as the AC layer is sufficiently thick, the lack of an aggregate base layer does not have a significant negative pavement performance impact
-Lack of aggregate base limits future strategies
• Aging Influence:
Nearly all the streets exhibit various degrees of aging-related distress • Load-related Distresses:
Several streets exhibit various degrees of load-related distress • Complete replacement is not needed for nearly all streets Continuous monitoring of the pavement is recommended
10114
Improvement Strategies
• Maintenance
Slurry Seal with localized repairs (i.e., patches) and crack filling City is exploring new technologies for crack filling
Tiered crack approach
• Rehabilitation
Mill and Overlay with localized repairs and crack filling Target localized repairs for areas that need more extensive isolated treatments Interlayer system
Fiber-reinforced AC
Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix (ARHM)
• Reconstruction
Full-Depth Reclamation (FDR) with Cement Stabilized Pulverized Base (CSPB) 11115
Past and Future Phases
Past Projects:
• Slurry Seal Projects
2018-19
2019-20
2021-22
2022-23
• Rehab Project
Aliso Viejo Parkway from Cedarbrook to Moulton Parkway Glenwood Terrace Neighborhood
Alicia Parkway from Pacific Park Drive to Laguna Court Pacific Park Drive from Aliso Viejo Parkway to Aliso Creek Road Windsong, Cedarbrook, and Park Avenue
Deerhurst, Foxborough, and Wolverine Way
Aliso Creek Road from Wolverine to Alicia Parkway
Enterprise Street from Aliso Viejo Parkway to Aliso Creek Road Future Projects:
• Slurry Seal Projects
“Orange” Streets…….
• Rehab Project
Aliso Creek Road from Enterprise to SR 73
Glenwood Drive from SR 73 to Aliso Creek Road
Aliso Viejo Parkway from Enterprise to Aliso Creek Road 12 116
Recap
13 Findings and
Recommendations
Is the pavement condition
at risk? What is being done to
monitor, design, and
improve the roadway
network?
117
Summary
Continue proactively maintaining the roadway network
Continue executing innovative, practical, and cost-effective treatments
Optimize the remaining life
Remove-and-replace is not needed to install AB
Increase pavement funding level by total of $3M over 7 years ($450K annually).
14118
Questions?
15119
“Zone 4”, “Zone 5”, and Select CIP Streets
City of Aliso Viejo, California
Pavement Evaluation and Repair Recommendations Report
DRAFT
March 15, 2021
GMU Project No. 20-100-00
GMU
23241 Arroyo Vista
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
120
Mr. Quang Le, CITY OF ALISO VIEJO
Pavement Evaluation and Repair Recommendations Report, “Zone 4”, “Zone 5”, and Select CIP Streets, City of Aliso Viejo, California DRAFT
March 15, 2021 1 GMU Project 20-100-00
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Description Page
1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 3
1.1 PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................... 3
1.2 SCOPE .................................................................................................................................. 3
2. LOCATION AND PROJECT INFORMATION ........................................................................ 4
3. FIELD EXPLORATION ............................................................................................................ 4
3.1 PAVEMENT SURFACE CONDITION ASSESSMENT .................................................... 4
3.1.1 Select CIP Streets ........................................................................................................... 4
3.1.2 Zone 4 (Orange) Streets ................................................................................................. 5
3.1.3 Zone 5 (Red) Streets ...................................................................................................... 5
3.2 PAVEMENT CORINGS ...................................................................................................... 5
3.2.1 Select CIP Streets ........................................................................................................... 5
3.2.2 Zone 4 Streets ................................................................................................................ 6
3.2.3 Zone 5 Streets ................................................................................................................ 6
4. LABORATORY TESTING........................................................................................................ 6
5. PAVEMENT ENGINEERING ANALYSIS .............................................................................. 7
6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................................... 7
6.1 CONCLUSIONS................................................................................................................... 7
6.2 RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................................................................... 9
6.3 UNSTABLE MATERIALS .................................................................................................. 9
6.4 SPECIFICATIONS ............................................................................................................. 10
7. EXPECTATIONS ..................................................................................................................... 10
7.1 REFLECTIVE CRACKING ............................................................................................... 10
7.2 DESIGN LIFE .................................................................................................................... 10
8. LIMITATIONS ......................................................................................................................... 11
9. CLOSURE ................................................................................................................................ 12
121
Mr. Quang Le, CITY OF ALISO VIEJO
Pavement Evaluation and Repair Recommendations Report, “Zone 4”, “Zone 5”, and Select CIP Streets, City of Aliso Viejo, California DRAFT
March 15, 2021 2 GMU Project 20-100-00
Attachments:
Plate 1 – Project Limits Map
Plate 1.1 – Project Limits Table
Plate 2 – AC Core Hole Location Map
Plate 3 – Pavement Coring Summary Table
Appendix A – Select Photographs
Appendix B – Laboratory Data Summary
Appendix C – Pavement Repair Recommendations
122
Mr. Quang Le, CITY OF ALISO VIEJO
Pavement Evaluation and Repair Recommendations Report, “Zone 4”, “Zone 5”, and Select CIP Streets, City of Aliso Viejo, California DRAFT
March 15, 2021 3 GMU Project 20-100-00
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES
This report presents a summary of our pavement evaluation of various streets maintained by the City of Aliso Viejo . Specifically, the streets considered in this study include “Zone 4 (orange)”, “Zone 5 (red)”, and certain collector or arterial streets planned for improvement b etween fiscal years 2021 to 2024. The primary objectives of this evaluation include:
• Determining if aggregate base (AB) exist beneath the asphalt concrete (AC) pavement. • Providing our opinion and conclusion with regard to lack of AB and if this is detrimen tal to pavement performance.
• Determining if the condition of the subject streets is suitable for the pavement maintenance and/or repair types scheduled.
• Providing conceptual pavement repair recommendations to improve the condition of the subject streets.
Information such as the pavements’ current surface condition, coring data, and laboratory testing results was evaluated and analyzed to develop our conclusions and recommendations.
1.2 SCOPE
The following scope of work was performed, as outlined in our scope and fee proposal dated September 22, 2020:
1. Pavement surface condition assessments were performed to evaluate the general condition of the subject streets.
2. Coring locations were selected in areas of interest and delineated. Dig Alert was notified to identify potential conflicts with known underground utilities prior to drilling.
3. Asphalt concrete (AC) corings were performed at various locations throughout the street segments to measure and identify the various pavement layers, including AC thicknesses, aggregate base thicknesses (where present), and subgrade soil types.
4. Samples collected from the pavement corings were returned to our laboratory and tested for various engineering properties, including R -value, soil classification, and moisture content testing.
5. Pavement engineering analysis was performed to develop pavement repair recommendations.
6. This report was prepared to summarize our work, findings, conc lusions, and repair recommendations for the improvement of the subject streets.
123
Mr. Quang Le, CITY OF ALISO VIEJO
Pavement Evaluation and Repair Recommendations Report, “Zone 4”, “Zone 5”, and Select CIP Streets, City of Aliso Viejo, California DRAFT
March 15, 2021 4 GMU Project 20-100-00
2. LOCATION AND PROJECT INFORMATION
This project involved performing a limited evaluation of a significant number of the City’s streets.
The following table summarizes the quantity of streets evaluated for this study.
Table 1: Summary of Streets Evaluated
Description Approximate Quantities Comments
Select CIP Streets
(purple)
15 street segments
3.6 centerline miles
Primarily arterial or collector
streets.
Zone 4 Streets
(orange)
48 street segments
7.2 centerline miles
Primarily collector or
residential streets.
Zone 5 Streets
(red)
39 street segments
6.4 centerline miles
Primarily collector or
residential streets.
Total 97 street segments
16 centerline miles
The general locations of the roadway segments considered in this study are illustrated on Plate 1 – Project Limits Map and summarized within Plate 1.1 – Project Limits Table.
3. FIELD EXPLORATION
3.1 PAVEMENT SURFACE CONDITION ASSESSMENT
Pavement surface condition assessment s were performed in November 2020. The type, severity, and extent of the various observed distresses were documented in general accordance with ASTM D6433. Select photographs of the pavement surface condition is presented in Appendix A – Select Photographs.
3.1.1 Select CIP Streets
In summary, for the CIP streets evaluated as part of this study, predominate distresses observed include:
• Alligator cracking: low- to high-severity
• Longitudinal cracking: low- to medium-severity
• Transverse cracking: low- to medium-severity
• Potholes: low- to medium-severity
• Weathering: low- to medium-severity
Overall, the condition of the various CIP streets ranged from “ Poor” to “ Fair”, depending on location.
124
Mr. Quang Le, CITY OF ALISO VIEJO
Pavement Evaluation and Repair Recommendations Report, “Zone 4”, “Zone 5”, and Select CIP Streets, City of Aliso Viejo, California DRAFT
March 15, 2021 5 GMU Project 20-100-00
3.1.2 Zone 4 (Orange) Streets
In summary, predominate distresses observed include:
• Longitudinal cracking: low- to medium-severity
• Transverse cracking: low- to medium-severity
• Weathering: low- to medium-severity
Overall, the condition of the zone 4 streets ranged from “Good” to “Very Good”.
3.1.3 Zone 5 (Red) Streets
In summary, predominate distresses observed include:
• Alligator cracking: low-severity
• Longitudinal cracking: low- to medium-severity
• Transverse cracking: low- to medium-severity
• Weathering: low- to medium-severity
Overall, the condition of the zone 5 streets ranged from “Good” to “Very Good”.
3.2 PAVEMENT CORINGS
A total of 24 pavement coring locations were explored on November 11, 12, and 13, 2020 within the subject streets. Eight (8) coring locations were performed within each group of streets (“select CIP”, Zone 4, and Zone 5). The locations were selected based on the information gathered from the visual pavement surface condition assessments, as well as to gather subsurface data from distributed and representative locations throughout the project limits.
The corings were performed using a 6-inch-diameter electric core drill. The thickness of the asphalt concrete (AC), and underlying aggregate base (AB) layers, where encountered, was recorded. The depth to subgrade and visual classification of the subgrade samples were also logged during the pavement corings . Bulk samples of the subgrade were collected and delivered to GMU’s laboratory for further evaluation. Drive samples were collected at the top of the subgrade at select locations. The corings were backfilled with aggregate base and capped with asphalt concrete cold patch.
The results of the pavement corings are provided within Plate 2 – AC Core Hole Location Map and Plate 3 – Pavement Coring Summary Table.
3.2.1 Select CIP Streets
Along the various CIP street segments, the existing roadway is surfaced w ith 4.5- to 11.0-inch thick asphalt concrete (AC) pavement. The average AC thickness is approximately 7.5 inches. 125
Mr. Quang Le, CITY OF ALISO VIEJO
Pavement Evaluation and Repair Recommendations Report, “Zone 4”, “Zone 5”, and Select CIP Streets, City of Aliso Viejo, California DRAFT
March 15, 2021 6 GMU Project 20-100-00
Beneath the AC layer, the subgrade soil varies and included clayey SAND (SC), silty SAND (SM), and clayey SILT (ML).
An aggregate base (AB) layer was not encountered beneath the AC layer at any of the 8 coring locations explored within this group of streets.
3.2.2 Zone 4 Streets
Along the various zone 4 streets , the existing roadway is surfaced with 3.0 - to 9.5 -inch thick asphalt concrete (AC) pavement. The average AC thickness is approximately 6.5 inches.
Out of the 8 coring locations performed within Zone 4, one coring location ( C-5 located on Sherwood Drive), revealed an aggregate base (AB) layer below the AC layer. The AB layer at this location is 6 -inch thick. All other coring locations in Zone 4 revealed an AC layer constructed directly on top of subgrade.
The subgrade soil varies and included clayey SAND (SC) and clayey SILT (ML) materials.
3.2.3 Zone 5 Streets
Along the various zone 5 streets , the existing roadway is surfaced with 4. 25- to 9.0-inch thick asphalt concrete (AC) pavement. The average AC thickness is approximately 7.0 inches.
Beneath the A C layer, the subgrade soil varies between clayey SAND (SC), silty SAND (SM), clayey SILT (ML), and sandy CLAY (CL).
An aggregate base (AB) layer was not encountered beneath the AC layer at any of the 8 coring locations explored within this group of streets.
4. LABORATORY TESTING
Laboratory tests were performed on select samples obtained retrieved from the corings to evaluate various engineering properties of the subgrade soils. The laboratory tests performed include:
• R-value
• Sieve No. 200 wash for soil classification
• Atterberg Limits for soil classification
• Maximum density and optimum moisture content
• In-place moisture/density
The results of the laboratory testing are summarized and presented in Appendix B – Laboratory Data Summary.
126
Mr. Quang Le, CITY OF ALISO VIEJO
Pavement Evaluation and Repair Recommendations Report, “Zone 4”, “Zone 5”, and Select CIP Streets, City of Aliso Viejo, California DRAFT
March 15, 2021 7 GMU Project 20-100-00
5. PAVEMENT ENGINEERING ANALYSIS
Engineering analyses was performed in accordance with the Cal trans Highway Design Manual.
Topic 633 of the Cal trans Design Manual was followed to develop pavement thickness design recommendations. This design method considers the relationship between the subgrade R -value, gravel factor of the various pavement layers, and the traffic index (TI).
Traffic indices (TI’s) were assumed for use in our analysis. A traffic engineer should confirm the suitability of these assumptions.
The results of GMU’s laboratory R -value tests were used in the analysis. Design R -values were selected based on actual R-value results. If coring was not performed on a specific street, R-value results from nearby coring locations with similar subgrade soi l types were used as the design R - value.
6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
6.1 CONCLUSIONS
Pavement performance and deterioration is influenced by many factors. Some of these factors include the type and thickness of the pavement structural section, climate (temperature and moisture), material properties , construction variability, traffic volumes, subgrade strength, age, maintenance/rehabilitation work history, and more.
• Aggregate Base Influence: One of the objectives of this evaluation is to identify presence of aggregate base, as well as whether its absence would have a significant influence on pavement performance.
First, it is important to recognize the primary function of pavement, which is to transmit forces induced by traffic loads from the pavement surface into the underlying subgrade soil. The pavement structure should not exceed a certain level of permanent deforma tion over its design life period. To achieve this, various types of pavement structural materials are constructed on top of the subgrade surface to protect it from developing excess permanent deformation . The types and thicknesses of the pavement structura l material layers are selected based on a number of factors, such as traffic loading condition s, subgrade soil strength, and economy.
The pavement structural layers making up the overall pavement structure must be of sufficient types and thicknesses to pr otect the subgrade soil from excessive permanent deformation over its design life period. Different combinations of pavement layer types and thicknesses can be utilized to achieve this objective . The combination of layer types and thickness must ultimately be of sufficient thickness to achieve structural adequacy.
127
Mr. Quang Le, CITY OF ALISO VIEJO
Pavement Evaluation and Repair Recommendations Report, “Zone 4”, “Zone 5”, and Select CIP Streets, City of Aliso Viejo, California DRAFT
March 15, 2021 8 GMU Project 20-100-00
The two most common pavement section types are full -depth AC (AC on subgrade) pavement or composite AC/AB (AC over AB over subgrade) pavement. Streets can be constructed without an aggregate base layer, in this case referred to as full -depth AC, per recognized pavement structural design manuals, including Orange County Highway Design Manual, Caltrans Highway Design Manual, and other established pavement design standards. In summary, the lack of an aggregate base layer is not detrimental for pavement performance, but its absence requires a thicker AC layer to compensate for it.
In summary, in general, the lack of an aggregate base layer is not detrimental to pavement performance, provided that the AC layer is adequately thick. Streets absent of an aggregate base layer can still be cost -effectively maintained and rehabilitated , allowing for the roadway life to be extended and the life cycle cost of the street minimized.
For the streets eval uated for this particular study, all but one of the pavement corings performed revealed a pavement structural section consisting of AC constructed directly on top of subgrade (no aggregate base). The only coring location, performed on Sherwood Drive, revealed a pavement structural section consisting of 3 -inch thick AC over 6 -inch thick AB over subgrade soil. Through pavement structural thickness analysis, this 3 -inch thick AC section provides approximately the same load -carrying capacity as a pavement structural section consisting of 5.5 -inch AC over subgrade. The average of all full -depth AC core samples drilled from residential streets was 6.0 inches.
• Aging Influence: Streets will age and deteriorate during its design life period as it experiences aging and traffic loading. Nearly all streets evaluated for this study have developed varying degrees of expected aging-related distresses, including raveling/weathering and longitudinal, transverse, and block cracking. As the pavement ages, it oxidizes and becomes increasingly brittle, leading to development of these types of distress. As these cracks worsen over time, moisture is allowed through the cracks. Excess moisture that saturates the underlying subgrade material will weaken its support, leading to deve lopment of more severe and eventually load -related distresses (i.e., permanent deformation, alligator cracking, depressions, potholes etc.).
Expansive subgrade soil, which is known to exist throughout the region and was identified in some of the coring locations (including lean and fat clays from coring locations C-6, C- 10, and C-13), will also contribute to development of longitudinal, transverse, and block cracking pavement distress types. Expansive subgrade soil expands as its moisture content increases and contracts as it dries. This cycling of wetting/drying and expansion/contraction contributes to development and worsening of these distress types.
• Localized Areas of Structural Failure: Localized areas of structural failure (i.e., isolated areas cont aining medium - or high -severity alligator cracking and/or depressions) w ere encountered at various locations throughout. Widespread areas of structural failure were 128
Mr. Quang Le, CITY OF ALISO VIEJO
Pavement Evaluation and Repair Recommendations Report, “Zone 4”, “Zone 5”, and Select CIP Streets, City of Aliso Viejo, California DRAFT
March 15, 2021 9 GMU Project 20-100-00
not encountered, indicating that in general, the pavement structural section offers adequate structural capacity.
In summary, the absence of aggregate base for the subject streets is not detrimental to pavement performance. Significant additional funding will be required (at least 3 to 6 times current funding levels) in order to reconstruct the roadways with an aggregate base laye r. The subject streets can still be cost-effectively maintained and rehabilitated to extend their service life.
6.2 RECOMMENDATIONS
Recommendations are summarized in Appendix C – Pavement Repair Recommendations for each group of streets in tabular format. Note that this project involved evaluating a substantial number of streets. To minimize repetitiveness and to consider the unique condition of each group of streets, important information is provided within the footnotes of the table.
The final pavement repair recommendation for each street is provided in the right most column within the Appendix C – Pavement R epair Recommendations tables. “Maint .” describes performing localized AC repairs, crack repairs, and application of a slurry seal. “Rehab.” refers to performing localized AC repairs, crack repairs, cold milling (either edge or uniform cold milling, depending on whether structural capacity improvements are needed), installing an AC leveling course (d epending on whether the AC cores separated at the lift interphase during drilling), installing an interlayer system (to reduce reflective cracking growth potential when full -depth cracks were identified within the AC cores), and constructing an AC or ARHM overlay.
6.3 UNSTABLE MATERIALS
Based on the soil types encountered and the moisture contents measured from select samples collected, it is our opinion that there is some potential for unstable materials to be exposed during construction.
If unstable materials are exposed, the following recommendations can be implemented. Unstable or soft subgrade conditions can be identified during construction by surface yielding under rubber- tired equipment loading and/or the inability to achieve proper compaction. The condition of the subgrade should be evaluated by GMU during the scarification and re-compaction efforts.
Drying back of localized wet soil conditions can be performed to address unstable soils if time allows. If drying back soil is not a practical option , we recommend increasing the AC base lift thicknesses by an additional 4 to 8 inches to “bridge” over the unstable conditions. The recommended thicknesses of remediation could be greater, or less, depending on the conditions encountered. Any areas that require remediation should be observed by the project geotechnical engineer to confirm the effectiveness of the recommendations provided herein.
The intent of these recommended remediation methods is to achieve a non-yielding subgrade when subjected to relatively heavy, rubber-tired construction equipment loading such as a loaded water 129
Mr. Quang Le, CITY OF ALISO VIEJO
Pavement Evaluation and Repair Recommendations Report, “Zone 4”, “Zone 5”, and Select CIP Streets, City of Aliso Viejo, California DRAFT
March 15, 2021 10 GMU Project 20-100-00
truck or loader with full bucket. The remediated areas should be proof -rolled with this t ype of equipment after remediation to confirm that the subgrade is unyielding. Pavement constructed on top of an unstable section will likely not achieve the required compaction and/or will experience reduced pavement life.
6.4 SPECIFICATIONS
We recommend following the City of Aliso Viejo Specifications and the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (Greenbook) when implementing these repair recommendations.
Requirements specified within the Greenbook should be followed, including but not limited to:
• Pavement surface preparation and tack coat application prior to installation overlay; • Subgrade, aggregate base, and asphalt concrete relative compaction requirements; • AC mixture requirements, including binder content, gradation, and Hveem Stabili ty requirements;
• AC paving operations, including temperatures, lift thicknesses, rolling patterns, and more.
7. EXPECTATIONS
7.1 REFLECTIVE CRACKING
Reflective cracking is the propagation of the pre-existing underlying cracks through the new overlay. The rate at which remaining underlying cracks reflect through the surface is dependent on a number of factors that are challenging to predict. Some of these factors include the width of underlying cracks that rem ain after milling, variability in traffic loading, climate conditions (temperature swings resulting in expansion/contraction), and strength of the underlying section(s) supporting the overlay.
The rule-of-thumb for reflective cracking is that cracks will propagate approximately 1-inch per year. In other words, there is potential for underlying cracks to grow to the surface within approximately 2 years for a 2-inch overlay when using conventional AC.
7.2 DESIGN LIFE
Excluding the potential for reflective cracking to propagate sooner and assuming that construction is performed in accordance with our recommendations and specifications, we estimate that implementing the recommended pavement repair will meet the requested 20 -year design life .
Please note, the pavement will develop distresses with time and should not be expected to remain completely crack free for the full duration of the 20 -year design-life period. Proper pavement maintenance, including localized AC repairs when needed, crack repairs, and proper maintenance, should be performed to achieve a full 20-year design life. Areas that are structurally deficient and do not receive localized repairs may not achieve the full 20-year design life. 130
Mr. Quang Le, CITY OF ALISO VIEJO
Pavement Evaluation and Repair Recommendations Report, “Zone 4”, “Zone 5”, and Select CIP Streets, City of Aliso Viejo, California DRAFT
March 15, 2021 11 GMU Project 20-100-00
8. LIMITATIONS
These recommendations are only intended to support the pavement repair map for the subject site.
All parties reviewing or utilizing this report should recognize that the findings, conclusions, and recommendations presented represent the results of our professional engineering efforts and judgments. Due to the inexact nature of the state of the art of these professions and the possible occurrence of undetected variables in subsurface conditions, we cannot guarantee that the conditions actually encountered during construction will be the same as those observed and sampled during our study or that there are no unknown subsurface conditions which could have an adverse effect on the use of the roadway. We have exercised a degree of care comparable to the standard of practice presently maintained by other professionals in the fields of geotechnical engineering and pavement engineering, and believe that our findings present a reasonably representative description of conditions and their probable influence on the grading and use of the streets. Surface cracks may develop sooner or later depending on a number of factors that are hard to predict or not provided to us, such as actual traffic volumes or the extent and severity of subsurface cracks that remain upon milling.
Because our conclusions and recommendations are based on a limited amount of geotechnical exploration and analysis, all parties should recognize the need for possible revisions to our conclusions and recommendations during construction of the project. The recommendations provided in this report are based on the assumption that an adequate program of observations and testing will be conducted by our firm during the construction phases in order to evaluate compliance with our recommendations and to provide r evised recommendations if necessary depending on conditions encountered.
GMU’s recommendations for this project are, to a high degree, dependent upon appropriate quality control of subgrade preparation, mix design compliance, and pavement construction proc esses.
Accordingly, the recommendations are made contingent upon the opportunity for GMU to observe the proposed construction. If parties other than GMU are engaged to provide such services, such parties must be notified that they will be required to assume complete responsibility as the engineer of record of the project by concurring with the recommendations in this letter and/or by providing alternative recommendations.
GMU performed its evaluation using the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar circumstances by reputable civil and/or geotechnical engineering professionals with experience in this area in similar soil conditions. No other warranty, either expressed or implied, is made as to the conclusions and recommendations contai ned in this report. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the City of Aliso Viejo in accordance with generally accepted pavement engineering practices.
131
Mr. Quang Le, CITY OF ALISO VIEJO
Pavement Evaluation and Repair Recommendations Report, “Zone 4”, “Zone 5”, and Select CIP Streets, City of Aliso Viejo, California DRAFT
March 15, 2021 12 GMU Project 20-100-00
9. CLOSURE
We appreciate this opportunity to provide our pavement evaluation services on you project. If there are any questions concerning our findings or recommendations, please do not hesitate to contact us and we will be happy to discuss them with you.
Respectfully submitted,
GMU GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
Ali Zalghout, M.Sc.
Pavement Staff Engineer
Roger W. Schlierkamp, M.Sc., PE 81529
Director of Pavement Engineering
132
00 3000'
Date:
Project No.:
Plate
Project Limits Map
20-100-00
March 15, 2021
1 UNINC.
LAGUNA
LAGUNA
HILLS
NIGUEL
LAGUNA WOODS
ALISO VIEJO
ALISO CREEK RD
LEGEND
ZONE 4
CA - 73
ALISO VIEJO PKWY
MOULTON PKWY
PACIFIC PARK DR
EL TORO RD
ALICIA PKWY
WOODCANYON
DR
ZONE 5
SELECT CIP STREETS
133
Street Name Functional
Classification Zone From To Length (ft)
Deerhurst LOCAL 4 (Orange) Wolverine Foxborough 1,808
Deerhurst LOCAL 4 (Orange) Foxborough Pacific Park Dr 1,747 Foxborough LOCAL 4 (Orange) Deerhurst Dead End 705
Wolverine Way LOCAL 4 (Orange) Aliso Creek Sandcastle 954 Wolverine Way LOCAL 4 (Orange) Sandcastle CDS 1,064
Aliso Creek Rd MPAH NA Aliso Viejo Pkwy / Wolverine Wy Liberty 1,767 Aliso Creek Rd MPAH NA Liberty Pursuit 942
Aliso Creek Rd MPAH NA Pursuit Wood Canyon Dr 985
Aliso Creek Rd MPAH NA Wood Canyon Dr City Limits (Bridge) 750 Enterprise LOCAL 3 (Yellow) Aliso Viejo Pkwy Summit 1,000 Enterprise LOCAL 3 (Yellow) Summit Aliso Creek Rd 2,035 Argonaut LOCAL 1 (Blue) Aliso Creek Rd Argonaut 1,483
Argonaut LOCAL 1 (Blue) Argonaut Argonaut 1,633
Argonaut LOCAL 1 (Blue) Argonaut Glenwood Drive 396
Columbia LOCAL 1 (Blue) Aliso Creek Road Aliso Viejo Pkwy 1,618 Autumnglen LOCAL 4 (orange) Aliso Creek Rd Summerfield 1,320 Summerfield LOCAL 4 (orange) Autumnglen Aliso Creek 1,543 Springdale LOCAL 4 (orange) Summerfield Dead End 408
Deerhurst LOCAL 4 (orange) Wolverine Foxborough 1,808
Deerhurst LOCAL 4 (orange) Foxborough Pacific Park Dr 1,747 Foxborough LOCAL 4 (orange) Deerhurst Dead End 705
Wolverine Way LOCAL 4 (orange) Aliso Creek Sandcastle 954 Wolverine Way LOCAL 4 (orange) Sandcastle CDS 1,064
Glenhurst LOCAL 4 (orange) Aliso Creek Gate 1,040
Knollwood LOCAL 4 (orange) Wood Canyon Dr City Line 528 Wood Canyon Dr MPAH 4 (orange) Aliso Creek Las Flores 1,104 Wood Canyon Dr MPAH 4 (orange) Las Flores Valencia 1,664 Wood Canyon Dr MPAH 4 (orange) Valencia Tivoli 1,009
Wood Canyon Dr MPAH 4 (orange) Tivoli Cottage Ln 989
Wood Canyon Dr MPAH 4 (orange) Cottage Ln SOKA South Entrance 1,577 Wood Canyon Dr MPAH 4 (orange) SOKA South Entrance Calypso St 1,102 Wood Canyon Dr MPAH 4 (orange) Calypso St Oak View Dr 1,642 Wood Canyon Dr MPAH 4 (orange) Oak View Dr Huntington Ln (Access Rd) 1,410 Wood Canyon Dr MPAH 4 (orange) Huntington Ln (Access Rd) Westridge Dr 1,167 Laurelwood LOCAL 4 (orange) Wood Canyon Cameo Dr 251
Cameo Dr LOCAL 4 (orange) Laurelwood St Charlemont Dr 752 Chancey Ct LOCAL 4 (orange) Cameo Dr Dead End 158
Charlemont Dr LOCAL 4 (orange) Cameo Dr Deerborn Dr 333 Deerborn Dr LOCAL 4 (orange) Cameo Dr Calypso St 854
Deerborn Dr LOCAL 4 (orange) Calypso St Sherwood Dr 528 Calypso St LOCAL 4 (orange) Wood Canyon Dr Sunbury Dr 580 Sunbury Dr LOCAL 4 (orange) Sherwood Dr Calypso St 618
Sherwood Dr LOCAL 4 (orange) Deerborn Dr Sunbury Dr 528 Somerset Dr LOCAL 4 (orange) Sunbury Dr Brookstone Pl 264 Brookstone Pl LOCAL 4 (orange) Somerset Dr Seton Dr 180 Seton Dr LOCAL 4 (orange) Brookstone Pl Sunbury Dr 310
Cliffwood LOCAL 4 (orange) Cranwell Chesterwood 628
Stockbridge LOCAL 4 (orange) Chesterwood Cranwell 653
Barrington LOCAL 4 (orange) Cranwell Chesterwood 264
Chesterwood LOCAL 4 (orange) Cliffwood Barrington 528
Cranwell LOCAL 4 (orange) Barrington Cliffwood 528
Berkshire LOCAL 4 (orange) Cranwell Chesterwood 264
Oakgrove Dr LOCAL 4 (orange) Wood Canyon Dr Halfway South 1,340 Mallorn Dr LOCAL 4 (orange) Rowan Dr Dead End 1,186
Birch Dr LOCAL 4 (orange) Rowan Dr Mallorn Dr 270
Rowan Dr LOCAL 4 (orange) Mallorn Birch 389
CIP & Misc Streets (FY 20-21 through 22-23)
Zone 4 Street List
Plate 1.1 - Project Limits Table DRAFT
Project No. 20-100-00
Plate 1.1 - Project Limits Table
134
Walnut Dr LOCAL 4 (orange) Mallorn Dr End 264
Beech Dr LOCAL 4 (orange) Poplar Dr Pacific Grove Dr 792 Chestnut Dr LOCAL 4 (orange) Beech Dr Pacific Grove Dr 528 Sequoia Dr LOCAL 4 (orange) Pacific Grove Dr Beech Dr 728 Maple Dr LOCAL 4 (orange) Poplar Dr Pacific Grove Dr 567 Pacific Grove Dr LOCAL 4 (orange) Oakgrove Dr Maple Dr 528 Poplar Dr LOCAL 4 (orange) Maple Dr Beech Dr 528
Heather Ridge LOCAL 5 (red) Pacific Park Dr Woodside 471 Woodside LOCAL 5 (red) Morning Ridge Creekside 807
Creekside LOCAL 5 (red) Woodside Morningridge 792
Morning Ridge LOCAL 5 (red) Alicia Pkwy Creekside 561
Morning Ridge LOCAL 5 (red) Creekside Woodside 1,126
City Lights Dr LOCAL 5 (red) Pacific Park Prvt Prop 1,390 Journey LOCAL 5 (red) Aliso Creek Pacific Park Dr 1,829 Journey LOCAL 5 (red) Journey (N) Journey (S) 3,207
Liberty LOCAL 5 (red) Aliso Viejo Pkwy 1033' s/o Aliso Viejo Pkwy 1,033 Liberty LOCAL 5 (red) 1033' s/o Aliso Viejo Pkwy Pursuit 2,179 Liberty LOCAL 5 (red) Pursuit Aliso Creek Rd 955
Orion LOCAL 5 (red) Liberty End 447
Pursuit LOCAL 5 (red) Liberty Rue Du Chateau 890
Pursuit LOCAL 5 (red) Rue Du Chateau Lyon Ridge 1,538
Pursuit LOCAL 5 (red) Lyon Ridge Aliso Creek Rd 1,580
Duray Ct LOCAL 5 (red) Monstad St End 264
Monstad St LOCAL 5 (red) Pursuit Grindlay Pl 984
Monstad St LOCAL 5 (red) Monstad St End 68
Kewen Wy LOCAL 5 (red) Grindlay Pl Monstad St 538
Grindlay Pl LOCAL 5 (red) Monstad St Kewen Wy 190
Lyon Ridge LOCAL 5 (red) Lyon Ridge Dead End 796
Lyon Ridge LOCAL 5 (red) Pursuit Lyon Ridge 157
Lyon Ridge LOCAL 5 (red) Lyon Ridge Dead End 88
Mesa Cr LOCAL 5 (red) Lyon Ridge End 260
Oakview Dr LOCAL 5 (red) Wood Canyon Dr Crimson Canyon 943 Oakview Dr LOCAL 5 (red) Crimson Canyon Endless Vista 1,486 Oakview Dr LOCAL 5 (red) Endless Vista Gate 2,018
Southern Hills Dr LOCAL 5 (red) Bel Flora Ct Dead End 976 Bel Flora Ct LOCAL 5 (red) Oakview Dr Country Walk Dr 542 Country Walk Dr LOCAL 5 (red) Southern Hills Dr Bel Flora Ct 542 Westridge Dr LOCAL 5 (red) Oakview Dr Wood Canyon Dr 874 Midnight Ct LOCAL 5 (red) Dawn Ln Dead End 158
Dawn Ln LOCAL 5 (red) Oakview Dr Dusk Wy 1,255
Dusk Wy LOCAL 5 (red) Dawn Ln Evening Light 264
Evening Light Ln LOCAL 5 (red) Dusk Wy Dawn Ln 866
Style Dr LOCAL 5 (red) Gatewood Dr Dead End 410
Style Dr LOCAL 5 (red) Style Dr End 63
Gatewood Dr LOCAL 5 (red) Oakview Dr Dead End 1,136
Shining Star Wy LOCAL 5 (red) Gatewood Dr End 102
Zone 5 Street List
Plate 1.1 - Project Limits Table
135
00 3000'
Date:
Project No.:
Plate
AC Core Hole Location Map
20-100-00
March 15, 2021
2 C-4
C-7
C-6
C-11
C-3
C-2
C-1
UNINC.
UNINC.
LAGUNA
LAGUNA
HILLS
NIGUEL
LAGUNA WOODS
ALISO VIEJO
ALISO CREEK RD
LEGEND
AC CORE LOCATION
CA - 73
C-14
C-16
C-15
C-9
C-10
C-23
C-12
C-8
ALISO VIEJO PKWY
MOULTON PKWY
PACIFIC PARK DR
EL TORO RD
ALICIA PKWY
C-17
C-19
C-21
C-20
C-13
WOODCANYON
DR
C-24
C-22
C-5
C-18
AC CORE
HOLE #
AC THICKNESS
(INCHES)
AB THICKNESS
(INCHES) SUBGRADE MC ZONE SHEET
C-1 6 ML 45.1% 4 2.1
C-2 5.5 SC 4 2.2
C-3 9.5 SC 4 2.3
C-4 8.75 ML 27.9% 4 2.4
C-5 3 6 ML 16.1% 4 2.5
C-6 5.5 CH 4 2.6
C-7 7.5 ML 31% 4 2.7
C-8 7 4 2.8
C-9 4.75 5 2.9
C-10 8 CL/ML 5 2.10
C-11 8 SM 5 2.5
C-12 8.75 ML 5 2.11
C-13 4.25 CL 21.6% 5 2.12
C-14 8.25 ML 24.4% 5 2.13
C-15 6 5 2.14
C-16 6.5 SC 16.7% 5 2.15
C-17 4.5 SC 4 2.16
C-18 9 SM 19.7% SELECT CIP
STREET 2.16
C-19 7 ML 22.6% SELECT CIP
STREET 2.17
C-20 4.5 ML 56.0% SELECT CIP
STREET 2.18
C-21 6.5 SC 37.1% SELECT CIP
STREET 2.19
C-22 8.75 SM SELECT CIP
STREET 2.20
C-23 11 SELECT CIP
STREET 2.21
C-24 9.5 SC 15.1% SELECT CIP
STREET 2.22
136
C-1
SUMMERFIELD
SPRINGDALE
MAYFAIR
AUTUMNGLEN
MEADWOBROOK
00100'
Date:
Project No.:
Plate
AC Core Hole Map
20-100-00
March 15, 2021
2.1 LEGEND
C-1AC CORE HOLE LOCATION
SUBGRADE: ML
6 INCHESAC
MC: 45.1%
137
C-2 GLENHURST
MATISSE CIR
MATISSE CIR
GAUGUIN CIR
00100'
Date:
Project No.:
Plate
AC Core Hole Map
March 15, 2021
20-100-002.2
LEGEND
C-2AC CORE HOLE LOCATION
SUBGRADE: SC
5.5 INCHES
AC
138
C-3
WOOD CANYON DR
KNOLLWOOD
LAS FLORES
LAS FLORES
LAS FLORES
00100'
Date:
Project No.:
Plate
AC Core Hole Map
20-100-00
March 15, 2021
2.3 LEGEND
C-3AC CORE HOLE LOCATION
SUBGRADE: SC
9.5 INCHES
AC
139
C-4
SOUTHERN
HILLS RD
COUNTRY WALK DR
WOOD CANYON DR
W HUNTINGTON LN
00100'
Date:
Project No.:
Plate
AC Core Hole Map
20-100-00
March 15, 2021
2.4 LEGEND
C-4AC CORE HOLE LOCATION
SUBGRADE: ML
8.75 INCHES
AC
MC: 27.9%
140
C-5
C-11
LIBERTY
SHERWOOD DR
SETON DR
SOMERSET DR
SUNBURY DR
00100'
Date:
Project No.:
Plate
AC Core Hole Map
20-100-00
March 15, 2021
2.5 LEGEND
C-11AC CORE HOLE LOCATION
SUBGRADE: ML
6 INCHES
3 INCHES
ACAB
MC: 16.1%
SUBGRADE: SM
8 INCHES
AC
141
C-6
CRANWELL
STOCKBRIDGE
CLIFFWOOD
BERKSHIRE
CHESTERWOOD
BOUNDARY OAK
WOOD CANYON DR
00100'
Date:
Project No.:
Plate
AC Core Hole Map
20-100-00
March 15, 2021
2.6 LEGEND
C-6AC CORE HOLE LOCATION
SUBGRADE: CH
5.5 INCHES
AC
142
C-7
BIRCH DR
ROWAN DR
WALNUT DR
MALLORN DR
PACIFIC GROVE DR
BOUNDARY OAK
00100'
Date:
Project No.:
Plate
AC Core Hole Map
20-100-00
March 15, 2021
2.7 LEGEND
C-7AC CORE HOLE LOCATION
SUBGRADE: ML
7.5 INCHES
AC
MC: 31%
143
C-8
PACIFIC PARK DR
ALISO VIEJO PKWY
POPLAR DR
MYRTLE DR
SEQUOIA DR
MAPLE DR
CHESTNUT DR
00100'
Date:
Project No.:
Plate
AC Core Hole Map
20-100-00
March 15, 2021
2.8 LEGEND
C-8AC CORE HOLE LOCATION
7 INCHES
AC
144
C-9
ALICIA PKWY
MORNING RIDGE
CREEKSIDE
BRAMBLE LN
RAMBLING LN
ABBEYWOOD LN
00100'
Date:
Project No.:
Plate
AC Core Hole Map
20-100-00
March 15, 2021
2.9 LEGEND
C-9AC CORE HOLE LOCATION
4.75 INCHES
AC
145
C-10
JOURNEY
JOURNEY
ALISO CREEK RD
00100'
Date:
Project No.:
Plate
AC Core Hole Map
20-100-00
March 15, 2021
2.10 LEGEND
C-10AC CORE HOLE LOCATION
SUBGRADE: CL/ML
8 INCHES
AC
146
C-12
ST MARY'S SCHOOL
PURSUIT
LYON RIDGE
MESS CIR
LYON RIDGE
00100'
Date:
Project No.:
Plate
AC Core Hole Map
20-100-00
March 15, 2021
2.11 LEGEND
C-12AC CORE HOLE LOCATION
SUBGRADE: ML
8.75 INCHES
AC
147
C-13
MONSTAD ST
KEWEN WAY
DURAY CT
PURSUIT
00100'
Date:
Project No.:
Plate
AC Core Hole Map
20-100-00
March 15, 2021
2.12 LEGEND
C-13AC CORE HOLE LOCATION
SUBGRADE: CL
4.25 INCHES
AC
MC: 21.6%
148
C-14
REMINGTON LN
DURANGO CT
OAK VIEW DR
ENDLESS VISTA
ENDLESS VISTA
ENDLESS VISTA
00100'
Date:
Project No.:
Plate
AC Core Hole Map
20-100-00
March 15, 2021
2.13 LEGEND
C-14AC CORE HOLE LOCATION
SUBGRADE: ML
8.25 INCHES
AC
MC: 24.4%
149
C-15
WESTRIDGE
OAK VIEW DR
DAWN LN
MIDNIGHT CT
EVENING LIGHT LN
EVENING LIGHT LN
WILD ROSE PL
00100'
Date:
Project No.:
Plate
AC Core Hole Map
20-100-00
March 15, 2021
2.14 LEGEND
C-15AC CORE HOLE LOCATION
6 INCHES
AC
150
C-16
ENDLESS VISTA
GATEWOOD DR
STYLE DR
OAK VIEW DR
ENDLESS VISTA
00100'
Date:
Project No.:
Plate
AC Core Hole Map
20-100-00
March 15, 2021
2.15 LEGEND
C-16AC CORE HOLE LOCATION
SUBGRADE: SC
6.5 INCHES
AC
MC: 16.7%
151
C-17
C-18 DEERHURST
WOLVERINE WAY
SANDCASTLE
SANDCASTLE
ALISO NIGUEL HIGH SCHOOL
00100'
Date:
Project No.:
Plate
AC Core Hole Map
20-100-00
March 15, 2021
2.16 LEGEND
C-18AC CORE HOLE LOCATION
SUBGRADE: SM
9 INCHES
AC
MC: 19.7%
SUBGRADE: SC
4.5 INCHES
AC
152
C-19
ENTERPRISE
VANTIS DR
SUMMIT
00100'
Date:
Project No.:
Plate
AC Core Hole Map
20-100-00
March 15, 2021
2.17 LEGEND
C-19AC CORE HOLE LOCATION
SUBGRADE: ML
7 INCHES
AC
MC: 22.6%
153
C-20
COLUMBIA
COLUMBIA
COLUMBIA
00100'
Date:
Project No.:
Plate
AC Core Hole Map
20-100-00
March 15, 2021
2.18 LEGEND
C-20AC CORE HOLE LOCATION
SUBGRADE: ML
4.5 INCHES
AC
MC: 56.0%
154
C-21
GLENWOOD DR
ARGONAUT
ARGONAUT
ARGONAUT
00100'
Date:
Project No.:
Plate
AC Core Hole Map
20-100-00
March 15, 2021
2.19 LEGEND
C-21AC CORE HOLE LOCATION
SUBGRADE: SC
6.5 INCHES
AC
MC: 37.1%
155
C-22
WOLVERINE WAY
ALISO VIEJO PKWY
ALISO CREEK RD
00100'
Date:
Project No.:
Plate
AC Core Hole Map
20-100-00
March 15, 2021
2.20 LEGEND
C-22AC CORE HOLE LOCATION
SUBGRADE: SM
8.75 INCHES
AC
156
C-23
ALISO CREEK RD
PURSUIT
GLENHURST
WOOD CANYON DR
BELVEDERE
00100'
Date:
Project No.:
Plate
AC Core Hole Map
20-100-00
March 15, 2021
2.21 LEGEND
C-23AC CORE HOLE LOCATION
11 INCHES
AC
157
C-24
ALISO CREEK RD
PURSUIT
GLENHURST
00100'
Date:
Project No.:
Plate
AC Core Hole Map
20-100-00
March 15, 2021
2.22 LEGEND
C-24AC CORE HOLE LOCATION
SUBGRADE: SC
9.5 INCHES
AC
MC: 15.1%
158
Core ID C-1 C-2 C-3 C-4 C-5 C-6
Location
Description
Autumnglen,
Westbound Direction
Glenhurst,
Northbound direction
Wood Canyon Drive,
Northbound direction
Wood Canyon Drive,
Northbound direction
Sherwood Drive,
Eastbound Direction
Stockbridge,
Southbound direction
Pavement
Section(s)
6" thick
Crack extends through entire
AC core sample
2 intact lifts: 2.5" & 3.5"
5.5" thick
Crack extends through entire
AC core sample
9.5" thick
Hairline-width crack extends
2.75 inches through AC core
sample
4 intact lifts: 2", 2", 3", & 2.5"
8.75" thick
1/8-inch width crack extends
through entire AC core sample
2 intact lifts: 2" cap, and 6.75"
3" thick
1/4-inch width crack extends
through entire AC core
sample
5.5" thick
Crack extends through entire
AC core sample
2 separated lifts: 2.5" and 3"
Aggregate Base (AB)
Description N/A N/A N/A N/A
6" thick
damp, and loose based on
difficulty of excavation
N/A
Subgrade
Description
6" to 28" depth:
Diatamaceous Earth/SANDY
SILT (ML): Light Yellow, damp
to moist, fine grained sand, soft
5.5" to 39" depth:
CLAYEY SAND (SC): Light
yellow, moist, fine to medium
grained sand, soft
9.5" to 32" depth:
CLAYEY SAND (SC): Brown,
dry to damp, medium grained
sands, soft
8.75" to 39" depth:
SILTY CLAY (ML): Light yellow,
damp to moist, fine grained, firm
9" to 44" depth:
SILTY CLAY (ML): Olive,
dampt to moist, medium
grained sands, firm
5.5" to 44" depth:
FAT CLAY (CH): Olive, damp to
moist, fine grained, firm
Maximum Depth Refusal at 28" Refusal at 39" Refusal at 32" Refusal at 39" Refusal at 44" Refusal at 44" Core ID C-7 C-8 C-9 C-10 C-11 C-12
Location
Description
Rowan Drive,
Southbound direction
Maple Drive,
Southbound direction
Creekside,
Southbound direction
Journey,
Northbound direction
Liberty,
Southbound direction
Pursuit,
Westbound Direction
Asphalt Concrete (AC)
Section
7.5" thick
1/2-inch width crack extends
through entire AC core sample
3 lifts: 1.5", 2.75", & 3.25",
7" thick
No cracking
4.75" thick
1/2-inch width crack extends
through entire AC core sample
8" thick
No Cracking
8" thick
1/4-inch width crack extends
through entire AC core
sample
2 separated lifts: 6.5" and
1.5"
8.75" thick
Crack extends through entire
AC core sample
Aggregate Base
Description N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Subgrade
Description
7.5" to 45" depth:
SILTY CLAY (ML): Olive, very
moist, medium grained sands,
firm
7" to 36" depth:
SANDY CLAY (CL): Olive,
damp to moist, medium grained
sands, very soft
4.75" to 48" depth:
SANDY CLAY (CL): Dark
Brown, damp to moist, medium
grained sands, soft
8" to 48" depth:
SILTY CLAY (ML): Brown,
moist, medium grained sand,
soft
8" to 48" depth:
SILTY SAND (SM): Olive,
damp to moist, medium
grained sand, loose
8.75" to 48" depth:
SILTY CLAY (ML): Light yellow,
damp, medium grained sand,
soft
Maximum Depth Refusal at 45" Refusal at 36" 48" 48" 48" 48" Plate 3 - Pavement Coring Summary Table
City of Aliso Viejo - "Zone 4", "Zone 5", and Select CIP Streets Pavement Evaluation Project No. 20-100-00
Corings performed on November 11, 12, and 13 of 2020
159
Core ID C-13 C-14 C-15 C-16 C-17 C-18
Location
Description
Monstad Street,
middle of the street
Oak View Drive,
Southbound direction
Dawn Lane,
Westbound direction
Gatewood Drive,
Eastbound direction
Deerhurst,
Southbound direction
Wolverine Way,
Southboound direction
Pavement
Section(s)
4.25" thick
Crack extends through entire
AC core sample
8.25" thick
1/8-inch width crack extends
1.75" through AC core sample
2 separated lifts: 1.75" and
6.5"
6" thick
1/4-inch width crack extends
through entire AC core sample
2 separated lifts: 2.25" and
3.75"
6.5" thick
Crack extends 5" through AC
core sample
2 separated lifts: 2" and 4.5"
4.5" thick
Crack extends through entire
AC core sample
2 separated lifts: 1.5" and 3"
9" thick
Crack extends 3.5" through
AC Core sample
2 intact lifts: 2" and 7"
Aggregate Base (AB)
Description N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Subgrade
Description
4.25" to 48" depth:
SANDY CLAY(CL): Olive,
damp to moist, fine grained
sand, firm
8.25" to 48" depth:
SILTY CLAY (ML): Light
yellow, damp to moist, fine
graind silty/medium grained
sand, loose
6" to 43" depth:
SILTY SAND (SM): Olive,
damp to moist, medium grained
sands, loose
6.5" to 48" depth:
CLAYEY SAND (SC): Olive,
moist, fine grained sands,
medium dense
4.5" to 48" depth:
CLAYEY SAND (SC): Olive,
damp to moist, fine grained
sands, loose
9" to 48" depth:
SILTY SAND(SM): Olive, dry
to damp, medium grained
sands, loose
Maximum Depth 48" 48" Refusal at 43" 48" 48" 48" Core ID C-19 C-20 C-21 C-22 C-23 C-24
Location
Description
Enterprise,
Northbound direction
Columbia,
Northbound direction
Argonaut,
Northbound direction
Aliso Creek Road,
Southbound direction
Aliso Creek Road,
Southbound direction
Aliso Creek Road,
Northbound direction
Asphalt Concrete (AC)
Section
7" thick
Crack extends 1.75" through
AC core sample
2 separated lifts: 1.75" and
5.25"
4.5" thick
Crack extends through AC
core sample
6.5" thick
Crack extends 5.5" through AC
core sample
8.75" thick
1/4-inch width crack extends 3"
through AC core sample
11" thick
1/2-inch width crack extends 5"
through AC core sample
2 separated lifts: 7.75" and
3.25"
9.5" thick
1/4-inch width crack extends 3"
through AC core sample
4 intact layers: 3", 1.5", 2.5",
and 2.5"
Aggregate Base
Description N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Subgrade
Description
7" to 34.5" depth:
SILTY CLAY (ML): Light yellow,
damp, fine grains, soft
4.5" to 48" depth:
CLAYEY SILT(ML): Light
yellow, damp to moist,fine
grains, soft
6.5" to 24" depth:
CLAYEY SAND (SC): Brown,
dry to damp, medium grained
sands, loose
24" to 48" depth:
SANDY CLAY (CL): Brown,
damp, medium grained sands,
medium dense
8.75" to 48" depth:
SILTY SAND (SM): Light
yellow, damp to moist, medium
grained sands, loose
11" to 34" depth:
CLAYEY SAND(SC): Olive, dry
to damp, fine grained sands,
medium dense
34"to 38" depth:
SILTY SAND(SM): Olive, damp
to moist, loose
9.5" to 48" depth:
CLAYEY SAND (SC): Light
brown, damp to moist, medium
grained sands, medium dense
Maximum Depth Refusal at 34.5" 48" 48" 48" 48" 48"
Plate 3 - Pavement Coring Summary Table
City of Aliso Viejo - "Zone 4", "Zone 5", and Select CIP Streets Pavement Evaluation Project No. 20-100-00
Corings performed on November 11, 12, and 13 of 2020
160
Appendix A
Select Photographs
161
Appendix A
Photo 1: Core location C-1 on Autumnglen Street, part of zone 4 streets. Core located within area containing medium-severity transverse cracking and low-severity weathering.
Photo 2: Core sample C-1 measuring 6-inch thick asphalt concrete (AC), and revealing a crack that extends through the entire AC layer.
162
Appendix A
Photo 3: Core location C-4 on Wood Canyon Drive, part of zone 4 streets. Core located within area containing low-severity alligator cracking and low-severity weathering.
Photo 4: Core sample C-4 measuring 8.75-inch thick AC.
163
Appendix A
Photo 5: Core location C-11 on Liberty Street, part of zone 5. Core located within area containing medium-severity transverse cracking, low- to medium-severity “bump-and-sag”, and low-severity weathering.
Photo 6: Core sample C-11 measuring 8.0-inch thick AC.
164
Appendix A
Photo 7: Core location C-14 on Oak View Drive, part of zone 5 streets. Core located within area containing to low- to medium-severity transverse cracking and low-severity weathering.
Photo 8: Core sample C-14 measuring 8.25-inch thick AC. 165
Appendix A
Photo 9: Core location C-19 on Enterprise Road, part of the select CIP streets. Core located within area containing to medium- to high-severity alligator cracking and medium-severity weathering.
Photo 10: Core sample C-19 measuring 7.0-inch thick AC.
166
Appendix A
Photo 11: Core location C-22 on Aliso Creek Road, a CIP street. Core located within area containing to low-severity alligator cracking, low- to medium-severity longitudinal cracking, and medium-severity weathering.
Photo 12: Core sample C-22 measuring 8.75-inch thick AC.
167
Appendix B
Laboratory Data Summary
168
C- 1 0.5 NA ML 45.1 62 71 76.0 36.0
C- 2 0.5 NA SC 42 36 19 17 47
C- 3 0.75 NA SC 44 30 19 11 30
C- 4 0.75 NA ML 27.9 76 64 94.0 23.0
C- 5 0.5 NA ML 16.1 109 83 115.0 14.0
C- 6 0.5 NA CH 76 50 28 22 22
C- 7 0.67 NA ML 31.0 89 95 101.5 18.0
C-10 0.75 NA CL-ML 29 24 19 5 15
C-11 0.75 NA SM 115.0 9.5
C-12 0.75 NA ML 112.0 16.0
C-13 0.33 NA CL 21.6 97 81 115.0 14.0
C-14 0.75 NA ML 24.4 100 98 38
C-16 0.5 NA SC 16.7 111 89 115.0 14.0
C-17 0.33 NA SC 50 31 19 12 12
C-18 0.5 NA SM 19.7 100 80 36
C-19 0.5 NA ML 22.6 90 72 11
C-20 0.5 NA ML 56.0 63 92 34
C-21 0.5 NA SC 37.1 77 85
C-22 0.75 NA SM 6 73
C-24 0.75 NA SC 15.1 104 69 121.0 11.0
SUMMARY OF SOIL LABORATORY DATA
TABLE B-1
USCS
Group
Symbol
PIPL
Sample Information
Boring
Number
In Situ
Water
Content,
%
In Situ
Dry Unit
Weight,
pcf
<2µ,
%
Elevation,
feet
Geologic
Unit
LL Maximum
Dry Unit
Weight,
pcf
Sand,
% pH
R-Value
Chemical Test Results
Expansion
Index
Min.
Resistivity
(ohm/cm)
Chloride
(ppm)
Sulfate
(ppm)
Atterberg Limits
In Situ
Satur-
ation,
%
Depth,
feet
Compaction
<#200,
%
Gravel,
%
Sieve/Hydrometer
Optimum
Water
Content,
%
Project No. 20-100-00
Project: Aliso Viejo City Wide Pavement Evaluation
GMU_TABLE_SOIL_LAB_DATA 20-100-00.GPJ FNC AB GWGN01.GDT 1/4/21 169
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 0 20 40 60 80 100
PL
17 11
22 5
12 LL
PI
Test
Symbol
Depth
(feet)
Geologic
Unit
C- 2
C- 3
C- 6
C-10
C-17
CLAYEY SAND (SC)
CLAYEY SAND (SC)
FAT CLAY (CH)
SILTY CLAY, CLAYEY SILT (CL-ML)
CLAYEY SAND (SC)
36 30
50 24
31 Boring
Number
19 19
28 19
19 Classification
"A" LINE
PLASTICITY INDEX (PI)
LIQUID LIMIT (LL)
CL or OL
ML or OL MH or OH
CH or OH
CL-ML
ATTERBERG LIMITS
0.5 0.8
0.5 0.8
0.3 Insitu Water
Content (%)
Project: Aliso Viejo City Wide Pavement Evaluation
Project No. 20-100-00
LIMITS 20-100-00.GPJ 2/9/21
170
60 65
70 75
80 85
90 95
100
105
110
115
120
0 10 20 30 40 50
MOISTURE CONTENT (%)
SG=2.60
SG=2.70
36 C- 1
Symbol
CLAYEY SILT (ML)
Classification
DRY DENSITY (pcf)
Optimum
Moisture
Content, %
Maximum
Dry Density,
pcf
Depth
(feet)
0.5 Geologic
Unit
COMPACTION TEST DATA
76 Boring
Number
Project: Aliso Viejo City Wide Pavement Evaluation
Project No. 20-100-00
DVTCOMP 20-100-00.GPJ 2/9/21
171
80 85
90 95
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
135
140
0 10 20 30 40 50
MOISTURE CONTENT (%)
SG=2.60
SG=2.70
23 C- 4
Symbol
CLAYEY SILT (ML)
Classification
DRY DENSITY (pcf)
Optimum
Moisture
Content, %
Maximum
Dry Density,
pcf
Depth
(feet)
0.8 Geologic
Unit
COMPACTION TEST DATA
94 Boring
Number
Project: Aliso Viejo City Wide Pavement Evaluation
Project No. 20-100-00
DVTCOMP 20-100-00.GPJ 2/9/21
172
80 85
90 95
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
135
140
0 10 20 30 40 50
MOISTURE CONTENT (%)
SG=2.60
SG=2.70
14 C- 5
Symbol
CLAYEY SILT (ML)
Classification
DRY DENSITY (pcf)
Optimum
Moisture
Content, %
Maximum
Dry Density,
pcf
Depth
(feet)
0.5 Geologic
Unit
COMPACTION TEST DATA
115
Boring
Number
Project: Aliso Viejo City Wide Pavement Evaluation
Project No. 20-100-00
DVTCOMP 20-100-00.GPJ 2/9/21
173
80 85
90 95
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
135
140
0 10 20 30 40 50
MOISTURE CONTENT (%)
SG=2.60
SG=2.70
18 C- 7
Symbol
CLAYEY SILT with SAND (ML)
Classification
DRY DENSITY (pcf)
Optimum
Moisture
Content, %
Maximum
Dry Density,
pcf
Depth
(feet)
0.7 Geologic
Unit
COMPACTION TEST DATA
101.5
Boring
Number
Project: Aliso Viejo City Wide Pavement Evaluation
Project No. 20-100-00
DVTCOMP 20-100-00.GPJ 2/9/21
174
80 85
90 95
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
135
140
0 10 20 30 40 50
MOISTURE CONTENT (%)
SG=2.60
SG=2.70
9.5 C-11
Symbol
SILTY SAND (SM)
Classification
DRY DENSITY (pcf)
Optimum
Moisture
Content, %
Maximum
Dry Density,
pcf
Depth
(feet)
0.8 Geologic
Unit
COMPACTION TEST DATA
115
Boring
Number
Project: Aliso Viejo City Wide Pavement Evaluation
Project No. 20-100-00
DVTCOMP 20-100-00.GPJ 2/9/21
175
80 85
90 95
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
135
140
0 10 20 30 40 50
MOISTURE CONTENT (%)
SG=2.60
SG=2.70
16 C-12
Symbol
CLAYEY SILT (ML)
Classification
DRY DENSITY (pcf)
Optimum
Moisture
Content, %
Maximum
Dry Density,
pcf
Depth
(feet)
0.8 Geologic
Unit
COMPACTION TEST DATA
112
Boring
Number
Project: Aliso Viejo City Wide Pavement Evaluation
Project No. 20-100-00
DVTCOMP 20-100-00.GPJ 2/9/21
176
80 85
90 95
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
135
140
0 10 20 30 40 50
MOISTURE CONTENT (%)
SG=2.60
SG=2.70
14 C-13
Symbol
SANDY CLAY (CL)
Classification
DRY DENSITY (pcf)
Optimum
Moisture
Content, %
Maximum
Dry Density,
pcf
Depth
(feet)
0.3 Geologic
Unit
COMPACTION TEST DATA
115
Boring
Number
Project: Aliso Viejo City Wide Pavement Evaluation
Project No. 20-100-00
DVTCOMP 20-100-00.GPJ 2/9/21
177
80 85
90 95
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
135
140
0 10 20 30 40 50
MOISTURE CONTENT (%)
SG=2.60
SG=2.70
14 C-16
Symbol
CLAYEY SAND (SC)
Classification
DRY DENSITY (pcf)
Optimum
Moisture
Content, %
Maximum
Dry Density,
pcf
Depth
(feet)
0.5 Geologic
Unit
COMPACTION TEST DATA
115
Boring
Number
Project: Aliso Viejo City Wide Pavement Evaluation
Project No. 20-100-00
DVTCOMP 20-100-00.GPJ 2/9/21
178
80 85
90 95
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
135
140
0 10 20 30 40 50
MOISTURE CONTENT (%)
SG=2.60
SG=2.70
11 C-24
Symbol
CLAYEY SAND (SC)
Classification
DRY DENSITY (pcf)
Optimum
Moisture
Content, %
Maximum
Dry Density,
pcf
Depth
(feet)
0.8 Geologic
Unit
COMPACTION TEST DATA
121
Boring
Number
Project: Aliso Viejo City Wide Pavement Evaluation
Project No. 20-100-00
DVTCOMP 20-100-00.GPJ 2/9/21
179
PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: 20-100-00
SAMPLE LOCATION: SAMPLE NUMBER: C-2
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: SAMPLE DEPTH: 5.5" - 28"
SAMPLED BY: TESTED BY: ER
DATE TESTED: 12/2/2020
AB C
21.0 22.9 24.9
959 974 996
2.36 2.43 2.53
101.8 98.8 95.5
350 270 170
321 201 122
57 16 4
44 87 113
4.86 4.99 5.49
58 30 16
54 29 16
246.2 69.1 17.3
47 49
47 210
5.5 1.5
2100.0
R-VALUE BY EXPANSION PRESSURE:
R-VALUE TEST REPORT
EXPANSION PRESSURE (psf)
COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE, psi
TEST SPECIMEN
EXPANSION, Inches x 10exp-4
R-VALUE CORRECTED
UNIT MASS OF COVER MATERIAL, kg/m^3 (Assumed):
R-VALUE UNCORRECTED
EXPANSION PRESSURE AT 300 PSI EXUDATION:
RA
WEIGHT OF SAMPLE, grams
GRAVEL FACTOR (Assumed):
R-VALUE AT EQUILIBRIUM:
TRAFFIC INDEX (Assumed):
Aliso Viejo City Wide Pavement Evaluation
R-VALUE BY EXUDATION PRESSURE:
STABILITY Ph 2,000 lbs (160 psi)
TURNS DISPLACEMENT
Clayey Sand (SC)
EXUDATION PRESSURE, psi
MOISTURE AT COMPACTION %
HEIGHT OF SAMPLE, Inches
DRY DENSITY, pcf
0.0 50.0
100.0
150.0
200.0
250.0
300.0
350.0
400.0
450.0
500.0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
COVER THICKNESS BY STABILOMETER
(mm)
COVER THICKNESS BY EXPANSION PRESSURE
(mm)
COVER THICKNESS (STABILOMETER BY
EXPANSION PRESSURE)
0 50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
EXPANSION PRESSURE (PSF)
EXUDATION PRESSURE (PSI)
EXPANSION PRESSURE VS. EXUDATION
PRESSURE
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
R-VALUE
EXUDATION PRESSURE (PSI)
R-VALUE VS. EXUDATION PRESSURE
CT-301
ASTM-D2844
180
PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: 20-100-00
SAMPLE LOCATION: SAMPLE NUMBER: C-3
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: SAMPLE DEPTH: 9.5" - 32"
SAMPLED BY: TESTED BY: ER
DATE TESTED: 12/3/2020
AB C
18.2 19.7 20.6
1024 1041 1090
2.44 2.48 2.64
107.6 106.3 103.7
320 240 170
394 314 185
42 16 14
64 90 94
4.29 4.35 5.00
47 31 26
47 31 29
181.4 69.1 60.5
30 30
NA
60 5.5
1.5 2100.0
R-VALUE BY EXPANSION PRESSURE:
R-VALUE TEST REPORT
EXPANSION PRESSURE (psf)
COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE, psi
TEST SPECIMEN
EXPANSION, Inches x 10exp-4
R-VALUE CORRECTED
UNIT MASS OF COVER MATERIAL, kg/m^3 (Assumed):
R-VALUE UNCORRECTED
EXPANSION PRESSURE AT 300 PSI EXUDATION:
RA
WEIGHT OF SAMPLE, grams
GRAVEL FACTOR (Assumed):
R-VALUE AT EQUILIBRIUM:
TRAFFIC INDEX (Assumed):
Aliso Viejo City Wide Pavement Evaluation
R-VALUE BY EXUDATION PRESSURE:
STABILITY Ph 2,000 lbs (160 psi)
TURNS DISPLACEMENT
Clayey Sand (SC)
EXUDATION PRESSURE, psi
MOISTURE AT COMPACTION %
HEIGHT OF SAMPLE, Inches
DRY DENSITY, pcf
0.0 50.0
100.0
150.0
200.0
250.0
300.0
350.0
400.0
450.0
500.0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
COVER THICKNESS BY STABILOMETER
(mm)
COVER THICKNESS BY EXPANSION PRESSURE
(mm)
COVER THICKNESS (STABILOMETER BY
EXPANSION PRESSURE)
0 50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
EXPANSION PRESSURE (PSF)
EXUDATION PRESSURE (PSI)
EXPANSION PRESSURE VS. EXUDATION
PRESSURE
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
R-VALUE
EXUDATION PRESSURE (PSI)
R-VALUE VS. EXUDATION PRESSURE
CT-301
ASTM-D2844
181
PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: 20-100-00
SAMPLE LOCATION: SAMPLE NUMBER: C-6
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: SAMPLE DEPTH: 5" - 44"
SAMPLED BY: TESTED BY: ER
DATE TESTED: 11/4/2020
AB C
28.3 26.5 25.0
1018 997 978
2.56 2.47 2.40
94.0 96.8 98.8
140 180 220
209 303 419
50 6 70
120 111 98
3.89 3.72 3.81
18 23 29
18 23 27
216.0 25.9 302.4
22 22
27 30
5.5 1.5
2100.0
HEIGHT OF SAMPLE, Inches
DRY DENSITY, pcf
R-VALUE AT EQUILIBRIUM:
TRAFFIC INDEX (Assumed):
Aliso Viejo City Wide Pavement Evaluation
R-VALUE BY EXUDATION PRESSURE:
STABILITY Ph 2,000 lbs (160 psi)
TURNS DISPLACEMENT
Fat Clay (CH)
EXUDATION PRESSURE, psi
UNIT MASS OF COVER MATERIAL, kg/m^3 (Assumed):
R-VALUE UNCORRECTED
EXPANSION PRESSURE AT 300 PSI EXUDATION:
RA
WEIGHT OF SAMPLE, grams
GRAVEL FACTOR (Assumed):
TEST SPECIMEN
EXPANSION, Inches x 10exp-4
R-VALUE CORRECTED
MOISTURE AT COMPACTION %
R-VALUE BY EXPANSION PRESSURE:
R-VALUE TEST REPORT
EXPANSION PRESSURE (psf)
COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE, psi
0.0 50.0
100.0
150.0
200.0
250.0
300.0
350.0
400.0
450.0
500.0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
COVER THICKNESS BY STABILOMETER
(mm)
COVER THICKNESS BY EXPANSION PRESSURE
(mm)
COVER THICKNESS (STABILOMETER BY
EXPANSION PRESSURE)
0 50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
EXPANSION PRESSURE (PSF)
EXUDATION PRESSURE (PSI)
EXPANSION PRESSURE VS. EXUDATION
PRESSURE
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
R-VALUE
EXUDATION PRESSURE (PSI)
R-VALUE VS. EXUDATION PRESSURE
CT-301
ASTM-D2844
182
PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: 20-100-00
SAMPLE LOCATION: SAMPLE NUMBER: C-10
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: SAMPLE DEPTH: 8" - 48"
SAMPLED BY: TESTED BY: LA
DATE TESTED: 12/9/2020
AB C
12.3 14.9 16.3
1026 1115 1158
2.28 2.55 2.61
121.5 115.4 115.6
300 150 125
510 314 170
3 00
44 113 131
4.28 5.00 5.12
61 17 10
55 17 11
13.0 0.0 0.0
15 15
NA
0 5.5
1.5 2100.0
HEIGHT OF SAMPLE, Inches
DRY DENSITY, pcf
R-VALUE AT EQUILIBRIUM:
TRAFFIC INDEX (Assumed):
Aliso Viejo City Wide Pavement Evaluation
R-VALUE BY EXUDATION PRESSURE:
STABILITY Ph 2,000 lbs (160 psi)
TURNS DISPLACEMENT
Silty Clay - Clayey Silt (CL-ML)
EXUDATION PRESSURE, psi
UNIT MASS OF COVER MATERIAL, kg/m^3 (Assumed):
R-VALUE UNCORRECTED
EXPANSION PRESSURE AT 300 PSI EXUDATION:
RA
WEIGHT OF SAMPLE, grams
GRAVEL FACTOR (Assumed):
TEST SPECIMEN
EXPANSION, Inches x 10exp-4
R-VALUE CORRECTED
MOISTURE AT COMPACTION %
R-VALUE BY EXPANSION PRESSURE:
R-VALUE TEST REPORT
EXPANSION PRESSURE (psf)
COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE, psi
0.0 50.0
100.0
150.0
200.0
250.0
300.0
350.0
400.0
450.0
500.0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
COVER THICKNESS BY STABILOMETER
(mm)
COVER THICKNESS BY EXPANSION PRESSURE
(mm)
COVER THICKNESS (STABILOMETER BY
EXPANSION PRESSURE)
0 50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
EXPANSION PRESSURE (PSF)
EXUDATION PRESSURE (PSI)
EXPANSION PRESSURE VS. EXUDATION
PRESSURE
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
R-VALUE
EXUDATION PRESSURE (PSI)
R-VALUE VS. EXUDATION PRESSURE
CT-301
ASTM-D2844
183
PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: 20-100-00
SAMPLE LOCATION: SAMPLE NUMBER: C-14
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: SAMPLE DEPTH: 8.25" - 48"
SAMPLED BY: TESTED BY: LA
DATE TESTED: 12/10/2020
AB C
29.4 31.0 32.9
945 1000 970
2.38 2.57 2.52
93.0 90.0 87.8
200 175 150
525 288 171
90 38 11
67 83 129
4.03 4.14 4.26
46 36 12
41 37 12
388.8 164.2 47.5
38 38
39 170
5.5 1.5
2100.0
R-VALUE BY EXPANSION PRESSURE:
R-VALUE TEST REPORT
EXPANSION PRESSURE (psf)
COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE, psi
TEST SPECIMEN
EXPANSION, Inches x 10exp-4
R-VALUE CORRECTED
UNIT MASS OF COVER MATERIAL, kg/m^3 (Assumed):
R-VALUE UNCORRECTED
EXPANSION PRESSURE AT 300 PSI EXUDATION:
RA
WEIGHT OF SAMPLE, grams
GRAVEL FACTOR (Assumed):
R-VALUE AT EQUILIBRIUM:
TRAFFIC INDEX (Assumed):
Aliso Viejo City Wide Pavement Evaluation
R-VALUE BY EXUDATION PRESSURE:
STABILITY Ph 2,000 lbs (160 psi)
TURNS DISPLACEMENT
CLAYEY SILT (ML)
EXUDATION PRESSURE, psi
MOISTURE AT COMPACTION %
HEIGHT OF SAMPLE, Inches
DRY DENSITY, pcf
0.0 50.0
100.0
150.0
200.0
250.0
300.0
350.0
400.0
450.0
500.0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
COVER THICKNESS BY STABILOMETER
(mm)
COVER THICKNESS BY EXPANSION PRESSURE
(mm)
COVER THICKNESS (STABILOMETER BY
EXPANSION PRESSURE)
0 50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
EXPANSION PRESSURE (PSF)
EXUDATION PRESSURE (PSI)
EXPANSION PRESSURE VS. EXUDATION
PRESSURE
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
R-VALUE
EXUDATION PRESSURE (PSI)
R-VALUE VS. EXUDATION PRESSURE
CT-301
ASTM-D2844
184
PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: 20-100-00
SAMPLE LOCATION: SAMPLE NUMBER: C-17
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: SAMPLE DEPTH: 4" - 48"
SAMPLED BY: TESTED BY: LA
DATE TESTED: 12/9/2020
AB C
16.0 18.2 20.3
1070 1034 1151
2.51 2.43 2.65
111.4 109.2 109.5
350 150 100
435 231 152
22 0
120 128 136
4.57 5.14 5.46
15 11 7
15 11 8
8.6 8.6 0.0
12 12
NA
10 5.5
1.5 2100.0
HEIGHT OF SAMPLE, Inches
DRY DENSITY, pcf
R-VALUE AT EQUILIBRIUM:
TRAFFIC INDEX (Assumed):
Aliso Viejo City Wide Pavement Evaluation
R-VALUE BY EXUDATION PRESSURE:
STABILITY Ph 2,000 lbs (160 psi)
TURNS DISPLACEMENT
CLAYEY SAND (SC)
EXUDATION PRESSURE, psi
UNIT MASS OF COVER MATERIAL, kg/m^3 (Assumed):
R-VALUE UNCORRECTED
EXPANSION PRESSURE AT 300 PSI EXUDATION:
RA
WEIGHT OF SAMPLE, grams
GRAVEL FACTOR (Assumed):
TEST SPECIMEN
EXPANSION, Inches x 10exp-4
R-VALUE CORRECTED
MOISTURE AT COMPACTION %
R-VALUE BY EXPANSION PRESSURE:
R-VALUE TEST REPORT
EXPANSION PRESSURE (psf)
COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE, psi
0.0 50.0
100.0
150.0
200.0
250.0
300.0
350.0
400.0
450.0
500.0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
COVER THICKNESS BY STABILOMETER
(mm)
COVER THICKNESS BY EXPANSION PRESSURE
(mm)
COVER THICKNESS (STABILOMETER BY
EXPANSION PRESSURE)
0 50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
EXPANSION PRESSURE (PSF)
EXUDATION PRESSURE (PSI)
EXPANSION PRESSURE VS. EXUDATION
PRESSURE
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
R-VALUE
EXUDATION PRESSURE (PSI)
R-VALUE VS. EXUDATION PRESSURE
CT-301
ASTM-D2844
185
PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: 20-100-00
SAMPLE LOCATION: SAMPLE NUMBER: C-18
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: SAMPLE DEPTH: 4" - 48"
SAMPLED BY: TESTED BY: ER
DATE TESTED: 12/3/2020
AB C
11.8 12.8 13.7
1062 1115 1141
2.31 2.50 2.57
124.6 119.8 118.4
350 250 180
425 328 262
6 00
41 66 94
4.24 4.79 5.29
63 43 25
58 43 26
25.9 0.0 0.0
36 36
NA
0 5.5
1.5 2100.0
R-VALUE BY EXPANSION PRESSURE:
R-VALUE TEST REPORT
EXPANSION PRESSURE (psf)
COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE, psi
TEST SPECIMEN
EXPANSION, Inches x 10exp-4
R-VALUE CORRECTED
UNIT MASS OF COVER MATERIAL, kg/m^3 (Assumed):
R-VALUE UNCORRECTED
EXPANSION PRESSURE AT 300 PSI EXUDATION:
RA
WEIGHT OF SAMPLE, grams
GRAVEL FACTOR (Assumed):
R-VALUE AT EQUILIBRIUM:
TRAFFIC INDEX (Assumed):
Aliso Viejo City Wide Pavement Evaluation
R-VALUE BY EXUDATION PRESSURE:
STABILITY Ph 2,000 lbs (160 psi)
TURNS DISPLACEMENT
SILTY SAND (SM)
EXUDATION PRESSURE, psi
MOISTURE AT COMPACTION %
HEIGHT OF SAMPLE, Inches
DRY DENSITY, pcf
0.0 50.0
100.0
150.0
200.0
250.0
300.0
350.0
400.0
450.0
500.0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
COVER THICKNESS BY STABILOMETER
(mm)
COVER THICKNESS BY EXPANSION PRESSURE
(mm)
COVER THICKNESS (STABILOMETER BY
EXPANSION PRESSURE)
0 50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
EXPANSION PRESSURE (PSF)
EXUDATION PRESSURE (PSI)
EXPANSION PRESSURE VS. EXUDATION
PRESSURE
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
R-VALUE
EXUDATION PRESSURE (PSI)
R-VALUE VS. EXUDATION PRESSURE
CT-301
ASTM-D2844
186
PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: 20-100-00
SAMPLE LOCATION: SAMPLE NUMBER: C-19
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: SAMPLE DEPTH: 6.5" - 34.5"
SAMPLED BY: TESTED BY: LA
DATE TESTED: 12/9/2020
AB C
32.0 33.9 37.4
870 930 910
2.34 2.55 2.50
85.4 82.5 80.3
200 200 100
497 372 163
52 26 41
98 129 126
4.04 4.27 4.73
28 12 12
25 12 12
224.6 112.3 177.1
11 11
NA
120
5.5 1.5
2100.0
R-VALUE BY EXPANSION PRESSURE:
R-VALUE TEST REPORT
EXPANSION PRESSURE (psf)
COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE, psi
TEST SPECIMEN
EXPANSION, Inches x 10exp-4
R-VALUE CORRECTED
UNIT MASS OF COVER MATERIAL, kg/m^3 (Assumed):
R-VALUE UNCORRECTED
EXPANSION PRESSURE AT 300 PSI EXUDATION:
RA
WEIGHT OF SAMPLE, grams
GRAVEL FACTOR (Assumed):
R-VALUE AT EQUILIBRIUM:
TRAFFIC INDEX (Assumed):
Aliso Viejo City Wide Pavement Evaluation
R-VALUE BY EXUDATION PRESSURE:
STABILITY Ph 2,000 lbs (160 psi)
TURNS DISPLACEMENT
CLAYEY SILT (ML)
EXUDATION PRESSURE, psi
MOISTURE AT COMPACTION %
HEIGHT OF SAMPLE, Inches
DRY DENSITY, pcf
0.0 50.0
100.0
150.0
200.0
250.0
300.0
350.0
400.0
450.0
500.0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
COVER THICKNESS BY STABILOMETER
(mm)
COVER THICKNESS BY EXPANSION PRESSURE
(mm)
COVER THICKNESS (STABILOMETER BY
EXPANSION PRESSURE)
0 50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
EXPANSION PRESSURE (PSF)
EXUDATION PRESSURE (PSI)
EXPANSION PRESSURE VS. EXUDATION
PRESSURE
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
R-VALUE
EXUDATION PRESSURE (PSI)
R-VALUE VS. EXUDATION PRESSURE
CT-301
ASTM-D2844
187
PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: 20-100-00
SAMPLE LOCATION: SAMPLE NUMBER: C-20
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: SAMPLE DEPTH: 4" - 48"
SAMPLED BY: TESTED BY: ER
DATE TESTED: 12/3/2020
AB C
44.0 47.5 53.3
787 802 828
2.43 2.39 2.53
68.2 69.0 64.7
350 250 140
398 233 150
19 9 32
69 87 119
4.12 4.36 4.78
44 32 15
42 28 15
82.1 38.9 138.2
34 34
NA
50 5.5
1.5 2100.0
HEIGHT OF SAMPLE, Inches
DRY DENSITY, pcf
R-VALUE AT EQUILIBRIUM:
TRAFFIC INDEX (Assumed):
Aliso Viejo City Wide Pavement Evaluation
R-VALUE BY EXUDATION PRESSURE:
STABILITY Ph 2,000 lbs (160 psi)
TURNS DISPLACEMENT
SANDY SILT (ML)
EXUDATION PRESSURE, psi
UNIT MASS OF COVER MATERIAL, kg/m^3 (Assumed):
R-VALUE UNCORRECTED
EXPANSION PRESSURE AT 300 PSI EXUDATION:
RA
WEIGHT OF SAMPLE, grams
GRAVEL FACTOR (Assumed):
TEST SPECIMEN
EXPANSION, Inches x 10exp-4
R-VALUE CORRECTED
MOISTURE AT COMPACTION %
R-VALUE BY EXPANSION PRESSURE:
R-VALUE TEST REPORT
EXPANSION PRESSURE (psf)
COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE, psi
0.0 50.0
100.0
150.0
200.0
250.0
300.0
350.0
400.0
450.0
500.0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
COVER THICKNESS BY STABILOMETER
(mm)
COVER THICKNESS BY EXPANSION PRESSURE
(mm)
COVER THICKNESS (STABILOMETER BY
EXPANSION PRESSURE)
0 50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
EXPANSION PRESSURE (PSF)
EXUDATION PRESSURE (PSI)
EXPANSION PRESSURE VS. EXUDATION
PRESSURE
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
R-VALUE
EXUDATION PRESSURE (PSI)
R-VALUE VS. EXUDATION PRESSURE
CT-301
ASTM-D2844
188
PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: 20-100-00
SAMPLE LOCATION: SAMPLE NUMBER: C-22
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: SAMPLE DEPTH: 8.75" - 48"
SAMPLED BY: TESTED BY: LA
DATE TESTED: 12/9/2020
AB C
12.3 12.9 13.5
1010 1014 1025
2.54 2.58 2.51
107.3 105.6 109.1
300 300 300
486 284 202
00 0
22 24 28
5.08 5.19 5.41
76 73 69
76 73 69
0.0 0.0 0.0
73 73
NA
0 5.5
1.5 2100.0
HEIGHT OF SAMPLE, Inches
DRY DENSITY, pcf
R-VALUE AT EQUILIBRIUM:
TRAFFIC INDEX (Assumed):
Aliso Viejo City Wide Pavement Evaluation
R-VALUE BY EXUDATION PRESSURE:
STABILITY Ph 2,000 lbs (160 psi)
TURNS DISPLACEMENT
SILTY SAND (SM)
EXUDATION PRESSURE, psi
UNIT MASS OF COVER MATERIAL, kg/m^3 (Assumed):
R-VALUE UNCORRECTED
EXPANSION PRESSURE AT 300 PSI EXUDATION:
RA
WEIGHT OF SAMPLE, grams
GRAVEL FACTOR (Assumed):
TEST SPECIMEN
EXPANSION, Inches x 10exp-4
R-VALUE CORRECTED
MOISTURE AT COMPACTION %
R-VALUE BY EXPANSION PRESSURE:
R-VALUE TEST REPORT
EXPANSION PRESSURE (psf)
COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE, psi
0.0 50.0
100.0
150.0
200.0
250.0
300.0
350.0
400.0
450.0
500.0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
COVER THICKNESS BY STABILOMETER
(mm)
COVER THICKNESS BY EXPANSION PRESSURE
(mm)
COVER THICKNESS (STABILOMETER BY
EXPANSION PRESSURE)
0 50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
EXPANSION PRESSURE (PSF)
EXUDATION PRESSURE (PSI)
EXPANSION PRESSURE VS. EXUDATION
PRESSURE
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
R-VALUE
EXUDATION PRESSURE (PSI)
R-VALUE VS. EXUDATION PRESSURE
CT-301
ASTM-D2844
189
Appendix C
Pavement Repair Recommendations
190
DRAFT
Table C-1: Select CIP Streets Pavement Repair Recommendations Street Name From To
2020
PMP
PCI
2020
PMP
Area
(SF)
Design Input
Parameters Structural Capacity
Findings &
Recommendations
Localized AC
Repair
Thickness
(inches)(2)(3)(6)
AC Leveling
Course
Thickness
(inches)(7)
AC/ARHM
Overlay
Thickness
(inches)
Reflective Cracking
Reduction
Recommendation
Additional
Comments
Recommended Repair
and Schedule Design
R-
value
Assumed
20-Year
TI(1)
Deerhurst Wolverine Foxborough 60 72,320 12 6.0 Note 10 8.5 1.0 2.0(9) Notes 4, 5 NA Rehab: 2021-22 Deerhurst Foxborough Pacific Park 55 69,880 12 6.0 Note 10 8.5 1.0 2.0(9) Notes 4, 5 NA Rehab: 2021-22 Foxborough Deerhurst Dead End 55 25,380 12 6.0 Note 10 8.5 1.0 2.0(9) Notes 4, 5 NA Rehab: 2021-22 Wolverine Aliso Creek Sandcastle 61 34,194 12 6.0 Note 10 8.5 1.0 2.0(9) Notes 4, 5 NA Rehab: 2021-22 Wolverine Sandcastle CDS 60 38,304 12 6.0 Note 10 8.5 1.0 2.0(9) Notes 4, 5 NA Rehab: 2021-22 Aliso Creek Rd
Wolverine
(Aliso Viejo
Pkwy)
Liberty SB: 55
NB: 66
SB: 83,266
NB: 83,066 50 9.0 Note 11 9.0 1.0 1.5(9) Notes 4, 9 NA Rehab: 2022-23 Aliso Creek Rd Liberty Pursuit SB: 67
NB: 72
SB: 43,666
NB: 43,430 50 9.0 Note 11 9.0 1.0 1.5(9) Notes 4, 9 NA Rehab: 2022-23 Aliso Creek Rd Pursuit Wood Cyn SB: 68
NB: 73
SB: 47,280
NB: 45,342 50 9.0 Note 11 9.0 1.0 1.5(9) Notes 4, 9 NA Rehab: 2022-23 Aliso Creek Rd Wood Cyn City Limits
(bridge)
SB: 67
NB: 69
SB: 35,520
NB: 35,830 50 9.0 Note 11 9.0 1.0 1.5(9) Notes 4, 9 NA Rehab: 2022-23 Enterprise Aliso Viejo Summit SB: 81
NB: 78
SB: 37,450
NB: 39,006 11 7.0 Note 10 10.5 1.0 2.0(9) Notes 4 NA Rehab: 2023-24 Enterprise Summit Aliso Creek SB: 58
NB: 36
SB: 77,915
NB: 78,936 11 7.0 Note 10 10.5 1.0 2.0(9) Notes 4 NA Rehab: 2023-24 Argonaut Aliso Creek Argonaut 64 65,252 34 6.0 Note 10 7.0 1.0 2.0(9) Notes 4, 5 NA Rehab: 2023-24 Argonaut Argonaut Argonaut 60 71,852 34 6.0 Note 10 7.0 1.0 2.0(9) Notes 4, 5 NA Rehab: 2023-24 Argonaut Argonaut Glenwood 70 17,432 34 6.0 Note 10 7.0 1.0 2.0(9) Notes 4, 5 NA Rehab: 2023-24 Columbia Aliso Creek Aliso Viejo 65 71,208 34 6.0 Note 10 7.0 1.0 2.0(9) Notes 4, 5 NA Rehab: 2023-24 Note (1): Traffic indices (TI’s) are assumed values. A traffic engineer should confirm these assumed values are valid.
Note (2): For areas containi ng medium- or high-severity load-related distresses (alligator cracking, depressions, potholes, etc.), perform full -depth localized AC repair with the thickness shown or match existing AC thickness, whichever is greater. The re commended thickness represents the total AC section (inclusive of AC leveling and AC/ARHM overlay layer thicknesses). We recommend processing, moisture conditioning, and re-compacting the top 6-inches of material below the bottom of excavation to at least optimum moisture content and at least 90 percent relative compaction.
Note (3): Areas that do not exhibit load-related distresses (alligator cracking, depressions, potholes) but contain relatively wide longitudinal/transverse cracks (≥3/4-inch wide) are recommended for 5.0-inch-thick localized AC repair (or the localized AC repair thickness if thinner), extending to 2 foot beyond the edge of the crack (4-foot wide minimum width).
Note (4): Fiber-reinforced AC (Forta-Fi or equivalent) is recommended for use with AC leveling and AC or ARHM overlay layers to reduce reflective cracking potential (not necessary for AC base layer).
Note (5): Pavement interlayer system, consisting of adequate tack application rate and Tensar GlasPave25, or equivalent, is recommended to be installed to further reduce reflective cracking potential.
Note (6): The recommended AC base course mix is Standard Specification for Public Works Construction (Greenbook) ½-inch maximum Type IIIC3 PG 64-10 AC.
Note (7): The recommended AC leveling course mix is Greenbook 3/8-inch maximum Type IIID3 PG 64-10 AC.
Note (8): The recommended AC overlay mix is Greenbook ½-inch maximum Type IIIC3 PG 64-10 AC.
Note (9): The recommended ARHM overlay mix is Greenbook ½-inch maximum ARHM-GG-C, except in cul-de-sac areas where conventional AC is recommended (Note 8).
Note (10): The existing AC section is inadequately thick. We recommend increasing the structural capacity of the roadway by thickening the existing AC pavement by least 2-inches in the travel lanes. Perform an edge mill and install the recommended overlay section to thicken the travel lanes and crown. Changes to cross slope should be reviewed and confirmed by the Project Civil Engineer for other considerations, such as drainage, super-elevation, etc.
Note (11): Other than the areas recommended for localized AC repair areas (which are areas recommended to be addressed through patching, Notes 2 and 6), the existing pavement appears to be structurally adequate and thickening of the roadway section is not necessary.
Therefore, perform either a uniform-depth mill across the full width of the roadway or an edge mill, whichever is more economical or appropriate for other considerations, such as drainage, superelevation, etc. as determined by the Project Civil Engineer. 191
DRAFT
Table C-2: Zone 4 Pavement Repair Recommendations
Street Name From To
2020
PMP
PCI
2020
PMP
Area
(SF)
Design Input
Parameters Structural
Capacity Findings
&
Recommendations
Localized
AC Repair
Thickness
(inches)(2)(3)(6)
AC Leveling
Course
Thickness
(inches)(7)
AC/ARHM
Overlay
Thickness
(inches)
Reflective
Cracking
Reduction
Recommendation
Additional
Comments
Recommended
Repair and
Schedule
Design
R-
value
Assumed
20-Yr
TI(1)
Autumnglen Aliso Creek Rd Summerfield 73 52,800 11 5.0 Note 10 7.0 1.0 1.5(8) Notes 4, 5 Note 13 Rehab: 2021-22 Summerfield Autumnglen Aliso Creek 74 61,720 11 5.0 Note 10 7.0 1.0 1.5(8) Notes 4, 5 Note 13 Rehab: 2021-22 Springdale Summerfield Dead End 75 11,016 11 5.0 Note 10 7.0 1.0 1.5(8) Notes 4, 5 Note 13 Rehab: 2021-22 Glenhurst Aliso Creek Gate 84 42,600 47 5.5 Note 11 6.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Maint: 2021-22 Knollwood Wood Canyon Dr City Line 75 21,120 30 6.0 Note 11 8.0 1.0 Rehab: 2022-23 Notes 4, 5 Note 13 Wood Canyon Dr Aliso Creek Las Flores 87 53,850 30 7.0 Note 11 10.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Maint: 2021-22 Wood Canyon Dr Las Flores Valencia 88 83,200 30 7.0 Note 11 10.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Maint: 2021-22 Wood Canyon Dr Valencia Tivoli 85 49,600 30 7.0 Note 11 10.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Maint: 2021-22 Wood Canyon Dr Tivoli Cottage Ln 82 48,900 30 7.0 Note 11 10.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Maint: 2021-22 Wood Canyon Dr Cottage Ln SOKA South
Entrance 90 93,897 30 7.0 Note 11 10.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Maint: 2021-22 Wood Canyon Dr SOKA South Entrance Calypso St 93 67,222 30 7.0 Note 11 10.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Maint: 2021-22 Wood Canyon Dr Calypso St Oak View Dr 89 98,612 30 7.0 Note 11 10.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Maint: 2021-22 Wood Canyon Dr Oak View Dr Huntington Ln
(Access Rd) 84 76,300 30 7.0 Note 11 10.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Maint: 2021-22 Wood Canyon Dr Huntington Ln
(Access Rd) Westridge Dr 90 62,535 30 7.0 Note 11 10.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Maint: 2021-22 Laurelwood Wood Canyon Cameo Dr 87 9,036 34 5.0 Note 11 4.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Assumes 6” AB exist. Maint: 2021-22 Cameo Dr Laurelwood St Charlemont Dr 86 27,022 34 5.0 Note 11 4.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Assumes 6” AB exist. Maint: 2021-22 Chancey Ct Cameo Dr Dead End 82 6,938 34 5.0 Note 11 4.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Assumes 6” AB exist. Maint: 2021-22 Charlemont Dr Cameo Dr Deerborn Dr 86 11,988 34 5.0 Note 11 4.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Assumes 6” AB exist. Maint: 2021-22 Deerborn Dr Cameo Dr Calypso St 89 30,744 34 5.0 Note 11 4.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Assumes 6” AB exist. Maint: 2021-22 Deerborn Dr Calypso St Sherwood Dr 88 19,008 34 5.0 Note 11 4.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Assumes 6” AB exist. Maint: 2021-22 Calypso St Wood Canyon Dr Sunbury Dr 86 20,880 34 5.0 Note 11 4.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Assumes 6” AB exist. Maint: 2021-22 Sunbury Dr Sherwood Dr Calypso St 87 22,248 34 5.0 Note 11 4.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Assumes 6” AB exist. Maint: 2021-22 Sherwood Dr Deerborn Dr Sunbury Dr 84 19,008 34 5.0 Note 11 4.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). 6” AB encountered. Maint: 2021-22 Somerset Dr Sunbury Dr Brookstone Pl 89 9,504 34 5.0 Note 11 4.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Assumes 6” AB exist. Maint: 2021-22 Brookstone Pl Somerset Dr Seton Dr 88 6,480 34 5.0 Note 11 4.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Assumes 6” AB exist. Maint: 2021-22 Seton Dr Brookstone Pl Sunbury Dr 89 11,160 34 5.0 Note 11 4.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Assumes 6” AB exist. Maint: 2021-22 Cliffwood Cranwell Chesterwood 87 18,840 22 4.5 Note 11 6.0 Note 14 2.0(8) Note 4 Note 13 Maint: 2021-22 Stockbridge Cranwell Chesterwood 84 22,855 22 4.5 Note 11 6.0 Note 14 2.0 (8) Note 4 Note 13 Maint: 2021-22 Barrington Cranwell Chesterwood 85 7,920 22 4.5 Note 11 6.0 Note 14 2.0 (8) Note 4 Note 13 Maint: 2021-22 Chesterwood Cliffwood Barrington 83 15,760 22 4.5 Note 11 6.0 Note 14 2.0 (8) Note 4 Note 13 Maint: 2021-22 Cranwell Barrington Cliffwood 76 15,840 22 4.5 Note 11 6.0 Note 14 2.0 (8) Note 4 Note 13 Maint: 2021-22 Berkshire Cranwell Chesterwood 84 12,800 22 4.5 Note 11 6.0 Note 14 2.0 (8) Note 4 Note 13 Maint: 2021-22 Oakgrove Dr Wood Canyon Dr Halfway South 76 53,480 22 4.5 Note 11 6.0 Note 14 2.0 (8) Note 4 Note 13 Maint: 2021-22 Mallorn Dr Rowan Dr Dead End 80 44,166 11 5.0 Note 11 8.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Maint: 2021-22 Birch Dr Rowan Dr Mallorn Dr 90 9,720 11 5.0 Note 11 8.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Maint: 2021-22 Rowan Dr Mallorn Birch 92 14,004 11 5.0 Note 11 8.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Maint: 2021-22 Walnut Dr Mallorn Dr End 90 10,954 11 5.0 Note 11 8.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Maint: 2021-22 Beech Dr Poplar Dr Pacific Grove Dr 83 31,680 11 5.0 Note 11 8.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Maint: 2021-22 Chestnut Dr Beech Dr Pacific Grove Dr 93 19,008 11 5.0 Note 11 8.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Maint: 2021-22 192
DRAFT
Sequoia Dr Pacific Grove Dr Beech Dr 95 26,208 11 5.0 Note 11 8.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Maint: 2021-22 Maple Dr Poplar Dr Pacific Grove Dr 83 22,680 11 5.0 Note 11 8.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Maint: 2021-22 Pacific Grove Dr Oakgrove Dr Maple Dr 87 21,120 11 5.0 Note 11 8.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Maint: 2021-22 Poplar Dr Maple Dr Beech Dr 88 21,120 11 5.0 Note 11 8.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Maint: 2021-22 Note (1): Traffic indices (TI’s) are assumed values. A traffic engineer should confirm these assumed values are valid.
Note (2): For areas containing medium- or high-severity load-related distresses (alligator cracking, depressions, potholes, etc.), perform full-depth localized AC repair with the thickness shown or match existing AC thickness, whichever is greater. The recommended thickness represents the total AC section (inclusive of AC leveling and AC/ARHM overlay layer thicknesses). We recommend processing, moisture conditioning, and re-compacting the top 6-inches of material below the bottom of excavation to at least optimum moisture content and at least 90 percent relative compaction.
Note (3): Areas that do not exhibit load-related distresses (alligator cracking, depressions, potholes) but contain relatively wide longitudinal/transverse cracks (≥3/4-inch wide) are recommended for 5.0-inch-thick localized AC repair (or the localized AC repair thickness if thinner), extending to 2 foot beyond the edge of the crack (4-foot wide minimum width).
Note (4): Fiber-reinforced AC (Forta-Fi or equivalent) is recommended for use with AC leveling and AC or ARHM overlay layers to reduce reflective cracking potential (not necessary for AC base layer).
Note (5): Pavement interlayer system, consisting of adequate tack application rate and Tensar GlasPave25, or equivalent, is recommended to be installed to further reduce reflective cracking potential.
Note (6): The recommended AC base course mix is Standard Specification for Public Works Construction (Greenbook) ½-inch maximum Type IIIC3 PG 64-10 AC.
Note (7): The recommended AC leveling course mix is Greenbook 3/8-inch maximum Type IIID3 PG 64-10 AC.
Note (8): The recommended AC overlay mix is Greenbook ½-inch maximum Type IIIC3 PG 64-10 AC.
Note (9): The recommended ARHM overlay mix is Greenbook ½-inch maximum ARHM-GG-C, except in cul-de-sac areas where conventional AC is recommended (Note 8).
Note (10): The existing AC section is inadequately thick. We recommend increasing the structural capacity of the roadway by thickening the existing AC pavement by least 2-inches in the travel lanes by performing an edge mill and installing the recommended overlay section to thicken the travel lanes and crown. Changes to cross slope should be reviewed and confirmed by the Project Civil Engineer for other considerations, such as drainage, super-elevation, etc.
Note (11): Other than the areas recommended for localized AC repair areas (which are areas recommended to be addressed through patching, Notes 2 and 6), the existing pavement appears to be structurally adequate and thickening of the roadway section is not necessary. Therefore, perform either a uniform-depth mill across the full width of the roadway or an edge mill, whichever is more economical or appropriate for other considerations, such as drainage, super-elevation, etc. as determined by the Project Civil Engineer.
Note (12): Current roadway condition is suitable for approximately 2 more cycles of maintenance (localized AC repairs, crack repairs, followed by slurry sealing), then pavement rehabilitation will likely be necessary.
Note (13): Current roadway condition warrants rehabilitation (localized repairs + mill/overlay), however, it can receive at most 1 more cycle of maintenance (localized AC repairs, crack repairs, followed by slurry sealing).
Note (14): Based on the pavement’s current condition, an AC leveling course does not appear to be required, therefore, it is not recommended at this time.
193
DRAFT
Table C-3: Zone 5 Pavement Repair Recommendations
Street Name From To
2020
PMP
PCI
2020
PMP
Area
(SF)
Design Input
Parameters Structural
Capacity Findings
&
Recommendations
Localized
AC Repair
Thickness
(inches)(2)(3)(6)
AC Leveling
Course
Thickness
(inches)(7)
AC/ARHM
Overlay
Thickness
(inches)
Reflective Cracking
Reduction
Recommendation
Additional
Comments
Recommended
Repair and
Schedule
Design
R-
value
Assumed
20-Yr
TI(1)
Heather Ridge Pacific Park Drive Woodside 65 18,725 15 5.0 Note 10 7.0 1.0 2.0(8) Notes 4, 5 Note 13 Maint: 2022-23 Woodside Morning Ridge Creekside 80 32,130 15 5.0 Note 10 7.0 1.0 2.0(8) Notes 4, 5 Note 13 Maint: 2022-23 Creekside Woodside Morningridge 76 31,680 15 5.0 Note 10 7.0 1.0 2.0(8) Notes 4, 5 Note 13 Maint: 2022-23 Morning Ridge Alicia Pkwy Creekside 70 22,440 15 5.0 Note 10 7.0 1.0 2.0(8) Notes 4, 5 Note 13 Maint: 2022-23 Morning Ridge Creekside Woodside 72 45,040 15 5.0 Note 10 7.0 1.0 2.0(8) Notes 4, 5 Note 13 Maint: 2022-23 City Lights Dr Pacific Park Prvt Prop 90 88,960 15 6.0 Note 11 8.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Maint: 2022-23 Journey Aliso Creek Pacific Park Dr 87 82,155 15 6.0 Note 11 8.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Maint: 2022-23 Journey Journey (N) Journey (S) 89 144,165 15 6.0 Note 11 8.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Maint: 2022-23 Liberty Aliso Viejo Pkwy 1033' s/o Aliso
Viejo Pkwy 79 66,112 50 7.0 Note 11 8.0 1.0 2.0(9) Notes 4, 5 Note 13 Rehab: 2023-24 Liberty 1033' s/o Aliso Viejo
Pkwy Pursuit 80 139,456 50 7.0 Note 11 8.0 1.0 2.0(9) Notes 4, 5 Note 13 Rehab: 2023-24 Liberty Pursuit Aliso Creek Rd 84 61,120 50 7.0 Note 11 8.0 1.0 2.0(9) Notes 4, 5 Note 13 Rehab: 2023-24 Orion Liberty End 90 20,115 50 7.0 Note 11 8.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Maint: 2022-23 Pursuit Liberty Rue Du Chateau 90 40,050 38 6.0 Note 11 7.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Maint: 2022-23 Pursuit Rue Du Chateau Lyon Ridge 80 69,210 38 6.0 Note 11 7.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Maint: 2022-23 Pursuit Lyon Ridge Aliso Creek Rd 85 71,100 38 6.0 Note 11 7.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Maint: 2022-23 Duray Ct Monstad St End 93 11,810 38 5.0 Note 11 5.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Maint: 2022-23 Monstad St Pursuit Grindlay Pl 84 40,610 38 5.0 Note 11 5.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Maint: 2022-23 Monstad St Monstad St End 80 6,010 38 5.0 Note 11 5.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Maint: 2022-23 Kewen Wy Grindlay Pl Monstad St 90 17,216 38 5.0 Note 11 5.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Maint: 2022-23 Grindlay Pl Monstad St Kewen Wy 78 8,850 38 5.0 Note 11 5.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Maint: 2022-23 Lyon Ridge Lyon Ridge Dead End 93 28,656 38 5.0 Note 11 5.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Maint: 2022-23 Lyon Ridge Pursuit Lyon Ridge 89 5,652 38 5.0 Note 11 5.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Maint: 2022-23 Lyon Ridge Lyon Ridge Dead End 93 3,168 38 5.0 Note 11 5.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Maint: 2022-23 Mesa Cr Lyon Ridge End 90 9,360 38 5.0 Note 11 5.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Maint: 2022-23 Oakview Dr Wood Canyon Dr Crimson Canyon 91 37,600 38 6.0 Note 11 8.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Maint: 2022-23 Oakview Dr Crimson Canyon Endless Vista 88 59,440 38 6.0 Note 11 8.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Maint: 2022-23 Oakview Dr Endless Vista Gate 87 80,370 38 6.0 Note 11 8.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Maint: 2022-23 Southern Hills Dr Bel Flora Ct Dead End 94 40,290 38 5.0 Note 11 6.0 1.0 2.0(9) Notes 4, 5 Note 13 Rehab: 2023-24 Bel Flora Ct Oakview Dr Country Walk Dr 88 21,680 38 5.0 Note 11 6.0 1.0 2.0(9) Notes 4, 5 Note 13 Rehab: 2023-24 Country Walk Dr Southern Hills Dr Bel Flora Ct 88 19,000 38 5.0 Note 11 6.0 1.0 2.0(9) Notes 4, 5 Note 13 Rehab: 2023-24 Westridge Dr Oakview Dr Wood Canyon Dr 84 34,480 38 5.0 Note 11 6.0 1.0 2.0(9) Notes 4, 5 Note 13 Rehab: 2023-24 Midnight Ct Dawn Ln Dead End 82 6,938 38 5.0 Note 11 6.0 1.0 2.0(9) Notes 4, 5 Note 13 Rehab: 2023-24 Dawn Ln Oakview Dr Dusk Wy 85 45,180 38 5.0 Note 11 6.0 1.0 2.0(9) Notes 4, 5 Note 13 Rehab: 2023-24 Dusk Wy Dawn Ln Evening Light 87 9,504 38 5.0 Note 11 6.0 1.0 2.0(9) Notes 4, 5 Note 13 Rehab: 2023-24 Evening Light Ln Dusk Wy Dawn Ln 88 31,176 38 5.0 Note 11 6.0 1.0 2.0(9) Notes 4, 5 Note 13 Rehab: 2023-24 Style Dr Gatewood Dr Dead End 94 17,510 47 5.0 Note 11 7.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Maint: 2022-23 Style Dr Style Dr End 90 3,528 47 5.0 Note 11 7.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Maint: 2022-23 Gatewood Dr Oakview Dr Dead End 94 45,450 47 5.0 Note 11 7.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Maint: 2022-23 Shining Star Wy Gatewood Dr End 94 4,922 47 5.0 Note 11 7.0 Rehabilitation is not due at this time (note 12). Maint: 2022-23
194
DRAFT
Note (1): Traffic indices (TI’s) are assumed values. A traffic engineer should confirm these assumed values are valid.
Note (2): For areas containing medium- or high-severity load-related distresses (alligator cracking, depressions, potholes, etc.), perform full-depth localized AC repair with the thickness shown or match existing AC thickness, whichever is greater. The recommended thickness represents the total AC section (inclusive of AC leveling and AC/ARHM overlay layer thicknesses). We recommend processing, moisture conditioning, and re-compacting the top 6-inches of material below the bottom of excavation to at least optimum moisture content and at least 90 percent relative compaction.
Note (3): Areas that do not exhibit load-related distresses (alligator cracking, depressions, potholes) but contain relatively wide longitudinal/transverse cracks (≥3/4-inch wide) are recommended for 5.0-inch-thick localized AC repair (or the localized AC repair thickness if thinner), extending to 2 foot beyond the edge of the crack (4-foot wide minimum width).
Note (4): Fiber-reinforced AC (Forta-Fi or equivalent) is recommended for use with AC leveling and AC or ARHM overlay layers to reduce reflective cracking potential (not necessary for AC base layer).
Note (5): Pavement interlayer system, consisting of adequate tack application rate and Tensar GlasPave25, or equivalent, is recommended to be installed to further reduce reflective cracking potential.
Note (6): The recommended AC base course mix is Standard Specification for Public Works Construction (Greenbook) ½-inch maximum Type IIIC3 PG 64-10 AC.
Note (7): The recommended AC leveling course mix is Greenbook 3/8-inch maximum Type IIID3 PG 64-10 AC.
Note (8): The recommended AC overlay mix is Greenbook ½-inch maximum Type IIIC3 PG 64-10 AC.
Note (9): The recommended ARHM overlay mix is Greenbook ½-inch maximum ARHM-GG-C, except in cul-de-sac areas where conventional AC is recommended (Note 8).
Note (10): The existing AC section is inadequately thick. We recommend increasing the structural capacity of the roadway by thickening the existing AC pavement by least 2 -inches in the travel lanes by performing an edge mill and installing the recommended overlay section to thicken the travel lanes and crown. Changes to cross slope should be reviewed and confirmed by the Project Civil Engineer for other considerations, such as drainage, super-elevation, etc.
Note (11): Other than the areas recommended for localized AC repair areas (which are areas recommended to be addressed through patching, Notes 2 and 6), the existing pavement appears to be structurally adequate and thickening of the roadway section is not necessary. Therefore, perform either a uniform-depth mill across the full width of the roadway or an edge mill, whichever is more economical or appropriate for other considerations, such as drainage, superelevation, etc. as determined by the Project Civil Engineer.
Note (12): Current roadway condition is suitable for approximately 2 more cycles of maintenance (localized AC repairs, crack repairs, followed by slurry sealing), then pavement rehabilitation will likely be necessary.
Note (13): Current roadway condition warrants rehabilitation (localized repairs + mill/overlay), however, it can receive at most 1 more cycle of maintenance (localized AC repairs, crack repairs, followed by slurry sealing).
195
“Zone 1”, “Zone 2”, “Zone 3”, and Select CIP and
Miscellaneous Streets
City of Aliso Viejo, California
Pavement Evaluation and Improvement Recommendations Report
September 25, 2024
GMU Project No. 20-100-01
GMU
30336 Esperanza
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
DRAFT
196
Mr. Quang Le, CITY OF ALISO VIEJO
Pavement Evaluation and Improvement Recommendations Report, “Zone 1”, “Zone 2”, “Zone 3”, and Select CIP and Miscellaneous Streets, City of Aliso Viejo, California
September 20, 2024 1 GMU Project 20-100-01
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Description Page
1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 3
1.1 PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................... 3
1.2 SCOPE .................................................................................................................................. 3
2. LOCATION AND PROJECT INFORMATION ........................................................................ 4
3. FIELD EXPLORATION ............................................................................................................ 5
3.1 PAVEMENT SURFACE CONDITION ASSESSMENT .................................................... 5
3.2 PAVEMENT CORINGS ...................................................................................................... 5
3.2.1 Select CIP & Miscellaneous Streets .............................................................................. 5
3.2.2 Select Zone 1 Streets ...................................................................................................... 6
3.2.3 Select Zone 2 Streets ...................................................................................................... 6
3.2.4 Select Zone 3 Streets ...................................................................................................... 6
3.3 FALLING-WEIGHT DEFLECTOMETER TESTING ........................................................ 7
4. LABORATORY TESTING........................................................................................................ 9
5. PAVEMENT ENGINEERING ANALYSIS .............................................................................. 9
6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................... 10
6.1 CONCLUSIONS................................................................................................................. 10
6.2 RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................................... 11
6.3 UNSTABLE MATERIALS ................................................................................................ 11
6.4 SPECIFICATIONS ............................................................................................................. 12
7. EXPECTATIONS ..................................................................................................................... 12
7.1 REFLECTIVE CRACKING ............................................................................................... 12
7.2 DESIGN LIFE OF REHABILITATION RECOMMENDATIONS .................................. 13
8. LIMITATIONS ......................................................................................................................... 13
9. CLOSURE ................................................................................................................................ 14
DRAFT
197
Mr. Quang Le, CITY OF ALISO VIEJO
Pavement Evaluation and Improvement Recommendations Report, “Zone 1”, “Zone 2”, “Zone 3”, and Select CIP and Miscellaneous Streets, City of Aliso Viejo, California
September 20, 2024 2 GMU Project 20-100-01
Attachments:
Plate 1 – Project Limits Map
Plate 1.1 – Project Limits Table
Plate 2 – AC Coring Location Map
Plate 3 – Pavement Coring Summary Table
Plate 4 – Pavement Deflection Testing Data Map
Appendix A – Select Photographs
Appendix B – Laboratory Data Summary
Appendix C – Pavement Repair Recommendations
DRAFT
198
Mr. Quang Le, CITY OF ALISO VIEJO
Pavement Evaluation and Improvement Recommendations Report, “Zone 1”, “Zone 2”, “Zone 3”, and Select CIP and Miscellaneous Streets, City of Aliso Viejo, California
September 20, 2024 3 GMU Project 20-100-01
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES
This report presents a summary of our pavement evaluation of various streets maintained by the City of Aliso Viejo. Specifically, the streets considered in this study include a majority of “Zone 1 (blue)”, “Zone 2 (green)”, “Zone 3 (yellow)”, and certain collector, arterial, and miscellaneous streets (purple) planned for improvement in the coming years.
GMU previously provided the City with a Pavement Evaluation and Repair Recommendations Report for CIP, “Zone 4,”, “Zone 5” and CIP and Misc street segments, dated March 15, 2021.
1.2 SCOPE
The following scope of work was performed, as outlined in our scope and fee proposal dated November 12, 2021:
• Pavement surface condition assessment s were performed to evaluate the general condition of the subject streets.
• Coring locations were selected in areas of interest and delineated , in collaboration with the City of Aliso Viejo. Dig Alert was notified to identify potential conflicts with known underground utilities prior to drilling.
• Asphalt concrete (AC) corings were performed at various locations throughout the street segments to measure and identify the in-situ pavement layer types and thicknesses , including AC, aggregate base, treated soil, and subgrade materials. • Pavement deflection testing was performed using a Falling-Weight Deflectometer (FWD) to collect deflection data for pavement structural evaluation and overlay thickness analysis and design for some selected streets.
• Samples collected from the pavement corings were returned to our laboratory and tested for various engineering properties, including R -value, soil classification, and moisture content testing.
• Pavement engineering analysis was performed to develop pavement repair recommendations.
• This report was prepared to summarize our work, findings, conclusions, and repair recommendations for the improvement of the subject streets.
DRAFT
199
Mr. Quang Le, CITY OF ALISO VIEJO
Pavement Evaluation and Improvement Recommendations Report, “Zone 1”, “Zone 2”, “Zone 3”, and Select CIP and Miscellaneous Streets, City of Aliso Viejo, California
September 20, 2024 4 GMU Project 20-100-01
2. LOCATION AND PROJECT INFORMATION
This project involved performing a limited evaluation of a significant number of the City’s streets. The following table summarizes the number and length of streets evaluated for this study.
Table 1: Summary of Streets Evaluated
Description Approximate Quantities Comments
Select CIP & Miscellaneous
Streets
(purple)
4 street segments
1 centerline miles
Primarily arterial or collector
streets.
Select Zone 1 Streets
(blue)
52 street segments
8.7 centerline miles
Primarily collector or
residential streets.
Select Zone 2 Streets
(green)
59 street segments
8.6 centerline miles
Primarily collector or
residential streets.
Select Zone 3 Streets
(yellow)
66 street segments
10.3 centerline miles
Primarily collector or
residential streets.
Total 181 street segments
28.6 centerline miles
The general locations of the roadway segments considered in this study are illustrated on Plate 1 – Project Limits Map and summarized within Plate 1.1 – Project Limits Table.
DRAFT
200
Mr. Quang Le, CITY OF ALISO VIEJO
Pavement Evaluation and Improvement Recommendations Report, “Zone 1”, “Zone 2”, “Zone 3”, and Select CIP and Miscellaneous Streets, City of Aliso Viejo, California
September 20, 2024 5 GMU Project 20-100-01
3. FIELD EXPLORATION
3.1 PAVEMENT SURFACE CONDITION ASSESSMENT
Pavement surface condition assessments were performed during August 2022. The type, severity, and extent of the various observed distresses were assessed in general accordance with ASTM D6433. Select photographs of the pavement surface condition are presented in Appendix A – Select Photographs.
3.2 PAVEMENT CORINGS
A total of 40 pavement coring location s were explored from August 29 through September 9, 2022, within the subject streets . The locations were selected based on the information gathered from the visual pavement surface condition assessments, as well as subsurface data from distributed and representative locations throughout the project limits. The locations of the pavement corings are illustrated on Plate 2 – AC Coring Location Map.
The corings were performed using a 6-inch- diameter electric core drill. The thickness of the asphalt concrete (AC), and underlying aggregate base (AB) layers, where encountered, was recorded. The depth to subgrade and visual classification of the subgrade samples were also logged during the pavement corings. Bulk samples of the subgrade were collected and delivered to GMU’s laboratory for further evaluation. Drive samples were collected at the top of the subgrade at select locations. The corings were backfilled with aggregate base and capped with asphalt concrete cold patch.
Plate 3 – Pavement Coring Summary Table provides additional information gathered from the pavement corings.
3.2.1 Select CIP & Miscellaneous Streets
A total of 4 corings were performed within the various CIP & Miscellaneous Street segments.
The existing roadway is surfaced with 8.0- to 15.25- inch thick asphalt concrete (AC) pavement.
The average AC thickness is approximately 13.25 inches.
Beneath the A C layer, the subgrade soil varies and includes Sandy E lastic SILT (MH), Silty SAND (SM), and Diatomaceous SILT (ML). The Diatomaceous SILT was encountered at C-2, located on Glenwood Drive.
An aggregate base (AB) layer was not encountered beneath the AC layer at any of the 4 coring locations explored within this group of streets.
DRAFT
201
Mr. Quang Le, CITY OF ALISO VIEJO
Pavement Evaluation and Improvement Recommendations Report, “Zone 1”, “Zone 2”, “Zone 3”, and Select CIP and Miscellaneous Streets, City of Aliso Viejo, California
September 20, 2024 6 GMU Project 20-100-01
3.2.2 Select Zone 1 Streets
A total of 11 corings were performed within the Zone 1 streets. The existing roadway is surfaced with 5.0- to 8.75-inch thick asphalt concrete (AC) pavement. The average AC thickness is approximately 6.5 inches.
Out of the 11 coring locations performed within Zone 1, only one coring location (C-26 located on Surfbird), revealed an aggregate base (AB) layer below the AC layer. The AB layer is 4.25 inches thick. Also, a 6.75- inch thick cement -treated base (CTB) was encountered at coring location C -20 (on Cedarbrook) . For all other coring locations in Zone 1, the AC layer was constructed directly on top of the subgrade.
The subgrade soil varies and includes Silty SAND (SM), Clayey SAND (SC), E lastic SILT (MH), Diatomaceous SILT (ML), and Sandy Lean CLAY (CL) materials. The Diatomaceous SILT was encountered at C-20.
3.2.3 Select Zone 2 Streets
A total of 11 corings were performed within the Zone 2 streets. The existing roadway is surfaced with 3.5- to 6.5-inch thick asphalt concrete (AC) pavement. The average AC thickness is approximately 4.25 inches.
Out of the 11 coring locations performed within Zone 2, five coring locations (C-31 through C- 35) revealed an aggregate base (AB) layer below the AC layer , while the remaining four coring locations did not. The AB layer, where encountered, ranges from 4.5- to 6.25 inches thick, with an average thickness of 5-inches. A cement-treated base (CTB) layer was encountered in 2 out of 11 locations. The CTB layer is 10- and 12.25-inches thick at c oring locations C -36 and C -37 respectively. All other coring locations in Zone 2 revealed an AC layer constructed directly on top of the subgrade.
The subgrade soil varies and includes Silty SAND (SM), Clayey SAND (SC), and Sandy Lean CLAY (CL) materials.
3.2.4 Select Zone 3 Streets
A total of 14 corings were performed along the Zone 3 streets. The existing roadway is surfaced with 5.5- to 1 3-inch thick asphalt concrete (AC) pavement. The average AC thickness is approximately 8.5 inches.
Beneath the AC layer, the subgrade soil varies and included Clayey SAND (SC), Sandy Elastic SILT (MH), Sandy CLAY (CL), and Fat CLAY (CH).
An aggregate base (AB) layer was not encountered beneath the AC layer at any of the 14 coring locations explored within this group of streets.
DRAFT
202
Mr. Quang Le, CITY OF ALISO VIEJO
Pavement Evaluation and Improvement Recommendations Report, “Zone 1”, “Zone 2”, “Zone 3”, and Select CIP and Miscellaneous Streets, City of Aliso Viejo, California
September 20, 2024 7 GMU Project 20-100-01
3.3 FALLING-WEIGHT DEFLECTOMETER TESTING
Falling weight deflectometer (deflection) testing was performed on September 15, 2022 in accordance with Caltrans Test Method CT 356. In summary, this test method involved applying a 9,000- pound impact load to the pavement surface and measuring the pavement’s deflection response. Higher deflection readings generally indicate lower pavement structural strength often due to thinner pavement, soft subgrade, more deteriorated pavement condition, or a combination of these factors.
Tests were conducted at intervals of approximately 150 to 200 feet on selected streets within the project limits. These streets were strategically chosen to provide representative data across the entire project area. Each deflection test point was geo -referenced using GPS, and the tests were staggered across lanes in both travel directions to enhance coverage.
Results of the deflection tests are visually depicted in Plate 4 – Pavement Deflection Testing Data Map and summarized in the following table.
Table 2: Deflection Analysis Summary and Findings
Zone Section
Design
20-Year
Traffic
Index
(TI)
“AC
Thickness”
for Analysis
Tolerable
Deflections
at Surface
(TDS), mils
80th
percentile of
measured
surface
deflection
(D80)
Findings
Select CIP &
Miscellaneous
Streets
Aliso Creek Road
From Enterprise to SR 73 11.0 0.5 11.0 5.7 Structurally adequate
Glenwood Dr
from SH 73 to Aliso Creek
Road
11.0 0.5 11.0 7.8 Structurally
adequate
Golf Dr
from Glenwood Dr to Santa
Barbara Dr
6.0 0.5 25.0 14.1 Structurally
adequate
Zone 1
Brookline
from Aliso Creek Road to CDS 7.0 0.5 20.0 29.3 Structurally inadequate
Cedarbrook
from Glenwood Dr to Aliso
Viejo Pkwy
7.0 0.45 21.0 19.3 Structurally
adequate
Mallard Dr
from Moorhen Ln to CDS 5.0 0.45 35.0 17.7 Structurally
adequate
DRAFT
203
Mr. Quang Le, CITY OF ALISO VIEJO
Pavement Evaluation and Improvement Recommendations Report, “Zone 1”, “Zone 2”, “Zone 3”, and Select CIP and Miscellaneous Streets, City of Aliso Viejo, California
September 20, 2024 8 GMU Project 20-100-01
Zone Section
Design
20-Year
Traffic
Index
(TI)
“AC
Thickness”
for Analysis
Tolerable
Deflections
at Surface
(TDS), mils
80th
percentile of
measured
surface
deflection
(D80)
Findings
Osprey Ave
from Surfbird to CDS 5.0 0.5 32.0 40.9 Structurally
inadequate
Surfbird Ln
from Merlin Ave to Seaguil Ln 5.5 0.5 28.0 11.8 Structurally adequate
Zone 2
EaglePoint
from CDS to CDS 5.0 0.35 40.0 26.2 Structurally
adequate
Golden Field
from Diamond Gate to CDS 5.0 0.5 32.0 23.8 Structurally adequate
Hummingbird Ln
from Aliso Creek Rd to CDS 6.0 0.5 25.0 31.0 Structurally inadequate
Mareblu
from Pacific Park Dr to CDS 6.0 0.5 25.0 29.6 Structurally inadequate
Phoebe Ct
from Royal Tern to CDS 5.0 0.5 32.0 29.2 Structurally
adequate
San Bittern Ln
from Humington Ln to CDS 5.0 0.5 32.0 25.6 Structurally adequate
Zone 3
Enterprise
from Pacific Park Dr to Aliso
Viejo Pkwy
7.0 0.5 20.0 8.6 Structurally
adequate
Chase
from Pacific Park Dr to
Sanborn
7.0 0.5 20.0 11.6 Structurally
adequate
DRAFT
204
Mr. Quang Le, CITY OF ALISO VIEJO
Pavement Evaluation and Improvement Recommendations Report, “Zone 1”, “Zone 2”, “Zone 3”, and Select CIP and Miscellaneous Streets, City of Aliso Viejo, California
September 20, 2024 9 GMU Project 20-100-01
Zone Section
Design
20-Year
Traffic
Index
(TI)
“AC
Thickness”
for Analysis
Tolerable
Deflections
at Surface
(TDS), mils
80th
percentile of
measured
surface
deflection
(D80)
Findings
Oak Grove
from Wood Canyon Dr to
Pleasant Walk
6.0 0.5 25.0 26.2 Structurally
inadequate
Pierremont
from ParisVille to CDS 5.0 0.5 32.0 21.1 Structurally
adequate
Rockrose
from Peppertree to
Canyon Vistas
5.5 0.5 28.0 23.7 Structurally
adequate
Sanborn Ln
from Chase to Aurora 6.0 0.5 25.0 10.4 Structurally
adequate
4. LABORATORY TESTING
Laboratory tests were performed on select samples obtained retrieved from the corings to evaluate various engineering properties of the subgrade soils. The laboratory tests performed include:
• R-value
• Sieve No. 200 wash for soil classification
• Atterberg Limits for soil classification
• Maximum density and optimum moisture content
• In-place moisture/density
• pH
• Sulfate
The results of the laboratory testing are summarized and presented in Appendix B – Laboratory Data Summary.
5. PAVEMENT ENGINEERING ANALYSIS
Engineering analyses was performed in accordance with the 6th edition of the Caltrans Highway Design Manual. Topic 633 of the Caltrans Design Manual was followed to develop pavement thickness design recommendations. This design method considers the relationship between the DRAFT
205
Mr. Quang Le, CITY OF ALISO VIEJO
Pavement Evaluation and Improvement Recommendations Report, “Zone 1”, “Zone 2”, “Zone 3”, and Select CIP and Miscellaneous Streets, City of Aliso Viejo, California
September 20, 2024 10 GMU Project 20-100-01
subgrade R-value, gravel factor of the various proposed pavement layers, and the traffic index (TI).
Traffic indices (TI’s) were assumed for use in our analysis. A traffic engineer should confirm the suitability of these assumptions.
The results of GMU’s laboratory R -value tests were utilized in the analysis. Design R -values were determined based on these laboratory tests. For streets where coring was not performed, R - value results from nearby coring locations with similar subgrade soil types were used as the design R-value.
6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
6.1 CONCLUSIONS
Based on our work and findings described in Sections 1 through 5 of this report, it is our opinion that multiple influencing factors have contributed to the roadway’s current condition. These factors are summarized as follows:
• Aggregate Base Influence: One of the objectives of this study is to identify the presence of aggregate base, as well as whether its absence would have a significant influence on pavement performance.
Similar to the findings from the phase -1 streets, this study also indicates that the lack of an aggregate base layer does not negatively impact pavement performance, as long as the AC layer is sufficiently thick. Streets without an aggregate base can still be maintained and rehabilitated cost -effectively, extending the roadway's lifespan and minimizing its life cycle costs.
• Aging Influence: Over time, streets naturally age and deteriorate due to environmental factors and traffic loading. All the streets evaluated in this study exhibit various degrees of aging-related distress, including raveling, weathering, and longitudinal, transverse, and block cracking. As pavement ages, it oxidizes and becomes brittle, leading to the development of these distresses. As the cracks progress, they allow moisture to infiltrate the pavement, which, when absorbed by the underlying subgrade, weakens its structural support. This can lead to more severe load -related distresses, such as permanent deformation, alligator cracking, depressions, and potholes.
Expansive subgrade soil, which is prevalent in the region and identified at several coring locations (including lean and fat clays from coring locations C-7, C-9, C-14, C-18, and C- 26), also contributes to the development of longitudinal, transverse, and block cracking.
This type of soil expands when its moisture content increases and contracts as it dries.
DRAFT
206
Mr. Quang Le, CITY OF ALISO VIEJO
Pavement Evaluation and Improvement Recommendations Report, “Zone 1”, “Zone 2”, “Zone 3”, and Select CIP and Miscellaneous Streets, City of Aliso Viejo, California
September 20, 2024 11 GMU Project 20-100-01
The repeated wetting and drying cycles cause expansion and contraction of the subgrade, which further exacerbates these distress types.
• Load-related distresses: Several load -related distresses were observed, including areas of alligator cracking, particularly concentrated within the wheel paths. Additionally, localized areas of structural failure, such as isolated regions with medium- to high- severity alligator cracking and/or depressions, were identified at various locations.
However, widespread structural failure was not detected, suggesting that the pavement’s structural section generally provides adequate load- bearing capacity , except for select streets determined to be structurally inadequate through deflection testing.
• Separated Lifts : Some asphalt concrete (AC) core samples separated at the interface between the AC lifts during coring or laboratory evaluation. This condition is typically caused by insufficient application of tack coat (the adhesive used to bond the overlaying lift to the underlying lift) during previous construction.
Most of the streets evaluated are in a condition suitable for another cycle of maintenance improvements (i.e., one more round of patch repairs, crack sealing, and slurry sealing). The streets should be re -evaluated approximately 6 years after its next cycle of slurry seal maintenance to determine if a more robust strategy, such as rehabilitation, will be necessary at that time.
6.2 RECOMMENDATIONS
Recommendations are provided in Appendix C – Pavement Repair Recommendations, which provides a tabular summary for each street zone. Given the extensive number of streets evaluated in this project, footnotes within the table offer important information specific to each group of streets, minimizing repetition while addressing the unique conditions of each area.
The final pavement repair recommendation for each street is listed in the rightmost column of the tables in Appendix C – Pavement Repair Recommendations. "Maint." refers to performing localized asphalt concrete (AC) repairs (i.e., patches), crack repairs, and applying a slurry seal. "Rehab." involves localized AC repairs, crack repairs, cold milling (either edge milling or uniform milling, depending on the need for structural capacity improvements), installing an AC leveling course (if AC cores separated at the lift interface during drilling), placing an interlayer system (to mitigate the potential for reflective cracking where full -depth cracks were identified in the AC cores), and applying an AC or asphalt rubber hot mix (ARHM) overlay.
6.3 UNSTABLE MATERIALS
Based on the soil types encountered and the moisture contents measured from select samples collected, it is our opinion that there is some potential for unstable materials to be exposed during construction.
DRAFT
207
Mr. Quang Le, CITY OF ALISO VIEJO
Pavement Evaluation and Improvement Recommendations Report, “Zone 1”, “Zone 2”, “Zone 3”, and Select CIP and Miscellaneous Streets, City of Aliso Viejo, California
September 20, 2024 12 GMU Project 20-100-01
If unstable materials are exposed, the following recommendations can be implemented. Unstable or soft subgrade conditions can be identified during construction by surface yielding under rubber-tired equipment loading and/or the inability to achieve proper compaction. The condition of the subgrade should be evaluated by GMU during the scarification and re-compaction efforts.
Drying back of localized wet soil conditions can be performed to address unstable soils if time allows. If drying back soil is not a practical option, we recommend increasing the AC base lift thicknesses by an additional 4 to 8 inches to “bridge” over the unstable conditions. The recommended thicknesses of remediation could be greater, or less, depending on the conditions encountered. Any areas that require remediation should be observed by the project geotechnical engineer to confirm the effectiveness of the recommendations provided herein.
These recommended remediation methods intend to achieve a non- yielding subgrade when subjected to relatively heavy, rubber-tired construction equipment loading such as a loaded water truck or loader with full bucket. The remediated areas should be proof -rolled with this type of equipment after remediation to confirm that the subgrade is unyielding. Pavement constructed on top of an unstable section will likely not achieve the required compaction and/or will experience reduced pavement life.
6.4 SPECIFICATIONS
We recommend following the City of Aliso Viejo Specifications and the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (Greenbook) when implementing these repair recommendations.
Requirements specified within the Greenbook should be followed, including but not limited to:
• Pavement surface preparation and tack coat application before installation of the overlay; • Subgrade, aggregate base, and asphalt concrete relative compaction requirements; • AC mixture requirements, including binder content, gradation, and Hveem Stability requirements;
• AC paving operations, including temperatures, lift thicknesses, rolling patterns, and more.
7. EXPECTATIONS
7.1 REFLECTIVE CRACKING
Reflective cracking refers to the propagation of pre -existing underlying cracks through a new overlay. The rate at which these underlying cracks reflect to the surface depends on several factors, many of which are difficult to predict with precision. Key factors include the width of the underlying cracks remaining after milling, variability in traffic loading, climate conditions (such as temperature fluctuations causing expansion and contraction), and the strength of the underlying pavement layers supporting the overlay.
DRAFT
208
Mr. Quang Le, CITY OF ALISO VIEJO
Pavement Evaluation and Improvement Recommendations Report, “Zone 1”, “Zone 2”, “Zone 3”, and Select CIP and Miscellaneous Streets, City of Aliso Viejo, California
September 20, 2024 13 GMU Project 20-100-01
A general rule of thumb for reflective cracking is that cracks tend to propagate at a rate of approximately 1 inch per year. This suggests that for a 2- inch overlay using conventional asphalt concrete (AC), there is potential for underlying cracks to reach the surface within approximately two years.
7.2 DESIGN LIFE OF REHABILITATION RECOMMENDATIONS
Excluding the potential for reflective cracking to propagate sooner and assuming that rehabilitation construction is performed per our recommendations and the project specifications, we estimate that the proposed pavement repairs will achieve a 15 - to 20- year design life.
However, it is important to note that the pavement will naturally develop distresses over time and should not be expected to remain entirely crack-free throughout the 15- to 20-year period. Proper pavement maintenance, including localized AC repairs when needed, crack repairs, and proper maintenance, should be performed to achieve the intended design life. Areas that are structurally deficient and do not receive appropriate localized repairs may not meet the full intended lifespan.
8. LIMITATIONS
These recommendations are only intended to support the pavement repair map for the subject site. All parties reviewing or utilizing this report should recognize that the findings, conclusions, and recommendations presented represent the results of our professional engineering efforts and judgments. Due to the inexact nature of the state of the art of these professions and the possible occurrence of undetected variables in subsurface conditions, there is no guarantee that the conditions actually encountered during construction will be the same as those observed and sampled during our study or that there are no unknown subsurface conditions which could have an adverse effect on the use of the roadway . We have exercised a degree of care comparable to the standard of practice presently maintained by other professionals in the fields of geotechnical engineering and pavement engineering, and believe that our findings present a reasonably representative description of conditions and their probable influence on the grading and use of the streets. Surface cracks may develop sooner or later depending on several factors that are hard to predict or not provided to us, such as actual traffic volumes or the extent and severity of subsurface cracks that remain upon milling.
Because our conclusions and recommendations are based on a limited amount of geotechnical exploration and analysis, all parties should recognize the need for possible revisions to our conclusions and recommendations during the construction of the project. The recommendations provided in this report are based on the assumption that an adequate program of observations and testing will be conducted by our firm during the construction phases to evaluate compliance with our recommendations and to provide revised recommendations if necessary, depending on conditions encountered.
DRAFT
209
Mr. Quang Le, CITY OF ALISO VIEJO
Pavement Evaluation and Improvement Recommendations Report, “Zone 1”, “Zone 2”, “Zone 3”, and Select CIP and Miscellaneous Streets, City of Aliso Viejo, California
September 20, 2024 14 GMU Project 20-100-01
GMU’s recommendations for this project are, to a high degree, dependent upon appropriate quality control of subgrade preparation, mix design compliance, and pavement construction processes. Accordingly, the recommendations are made contingent upon the opportunity for GMU to observe the proposed construction. If parties other than GMU are engaged to provide such services, such parties must be notified that they will be required to assume complete responsibility as the engineer of record of the project by concurring with the recommendations in this letter and/or by providing alternative recommendations.
GMU performed its evaluation using the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar circumstances by reputable civil and/or geotechnical engineering professionals with experience in this area in similar soil conditions. No other warranty, either expressed or implied, is made as to the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the City of Aliso Viejo in accordance with generally accepted pavement engineering practices.
9. CLOSURE
We appreciate this opportunity to provide our pavement evaluation services on you project. If there are any questions concerning our findings or recommendations, please do not hesitate to contact us and we will be happy to discuss them with you.
Respectfully submitted,
GMU GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
Amina Mannan, PhD, PE
Senior Engineer
Roger Schlierkamp, M.Sc., PE
Principal, Director of Pavement Engineering
DRAFT
210
00 2000'
UNINC.
UNINC.
LAGUNA
LAGUNA
HILLS
NIGUEL
LAGUNA WOODS
LEGEND
ZONE 1
Date:
Project No.:
Plate
Project Limits Map
20-100-01
September 20, 2024
1 ALICIA PKWY
MOULTON PKWY
CA - 73
PACIFIC PARK DR
ALISO VIEJO PKWY
ALISO CREEK RD
EL TORO RD
GLENWOOD DR
ZONE 2
ZONE 3
CIP AND MISCELLANEOUS
STREETS
DRAFT
211
Street Name Functional
Classification Zone From To Length (ft)
Aliso Creek Rd MPAH NA 73 Toll Overpass Enterprise 1,405 Glennwood Dr MPAH NA 73 Toll Overpass Brookline 997
Glennwood Dr MPAH NA Brookline Aliso Creek Road 1,549
Golf Drive Local NA Santa Barbara Drive Glenwood Drive 1,400 Blue Jay Dr LOCAL 1 (blue) Woodstork Ln Dead End West 470 Blue Jay Dr LOCAL 1 (blue) Woodstork Ln Dead End East 398 Woodstork Ln LOCAL 1 (blue) Blue Jay Dr Skylark Dr 264
Skylark Dr LOCAL 1 (blue) Eastwing Larkspur Dr 1,166
Raven Ln LOCAL 1 (blue) Skylark Dr Dead End 1,490
Larkspur Dr LOCAL 1 (blue) Skylark Dr Spoonbill Dr 913
Macaw St LOCAL 1 (blue) Dove St Larkspur Dr 264
Dove Ln LOCAL 1 (blue) Macaw St Dead End 424
Spoonbill Dr LOCAL 1 (blue) Surfbird Ln Lakespur Dr 528 Merlin Ave LOCAL 1 (blue) Surfbird Ln Moorhen Ln 1,672
Moorhen Ln LOCAL 1 (blue) Westwing Mallard Dr 392
Mallard Dr LOCAL 1 (blue) Moorhen Dead End 432
Peacock Ct LOCAL 1 (blue) Moorhen Ln Dead End 264
Eastwing LOCAL 1 (blue) Aliso Creek Rd Skylark Dr 528
Westwing LOCAL 1 (blue) Calle Corta Aliso Creek 1,784
Pheasant Ln LOCAL 1 (blue) Westwing Dead End 950
Rosy Finch Ln LOCAL 1 (blue) Westwing Dead End 964
Chickadee Ln LOCAL 1 (blue) Calle Corta Dead End 1,056
King Eider Ln LOCAL 1 (blue) Calle Corta Dead End 970
Sora Ct LOCAL 1 (blue) Westwing Dead End 73
Calle Corta LOCAL 1 (blue) Westwing El Toro Rd 1,364
Swan Ln LOCAL 1 (blue) Surfbird Ln Dead End 370
Dunlin Ln LOCAL 1 (blue) Surfbird Ln Dead End 528
Surfbird LOCAL 1 (blue) Spoonbill Dr Seagull Ln 1,211
Surfbird LOCAL 1 (blue) Seagull Ln Dead End 670
Solitaire Ln LOCAL 1 (blue) Seagull Ln Dead End 1,040
Blackbird Ln LOCAL 1 (blue) Seagull Ln Dead End 886
Seagull LOCAL 1 (blue) Surfbird Ln Canyon Wren Ln 933
Canyon Wren Ln LOCAL 1 (blue) Westwing Crane St 1,833
Canyon Wren Ln LOCAL 1 (blue) Crane St El Toro Rd 1,208 Golden Eagle Ct LOCAL 1 (blue) Surfbird Ln Dead End 264 Osprey Ave LOCAL 1 (blue) Surfbird Ln Dead End 264
Egret Ln LOCAL 1 (blue) Prairie Falcon Seagull Ln 2,039 Crane St LOCAL 1 (blue) Canyon Wren Ln Prairie Falcon 101 Prairie Falcon LOCAL 1 (blue) Egret Ln Crane St 1,223
Prairie Falcon LOCAL 1 (blue) Crane St Dead End 829
Cuervo Dr LOCAL 1 (blue) Canyon Wren Ln Wigeon Ln 1,066 Nutcracker Ln LOCAL 1 (blue) Cuervo Dr Dead End 421
Bob White Ln LOCAL 1 (blue) Pinyon Jay Cuervo Dr 264
Pinyon Jay Ln LOCAL 1 (blue) Wigeon Ln Bob White Ln 206 Wigeon Ln LOCAL 1 (blue) Cuervo Dr Pinyon Jay 264
Cardinal Ave LOCAL 1 (blue) Canyon Wren Ln Bluebird Ln 918 Bluebird Ln LOCAL 1 (blue) Cardinal Ave Dead End 921
Brookline LOCAL 1 (blue) Brookline Glenwood Drive 380
Brookline LOCAL 1 (blue) Aliso Creek Rd Dead End 1,551
Cedarbrook LOCAL 1 (blue) Rainwood Aliso Viejo Pkwy 1,510 Plate 1.1 - Project Limits Table
Project No. 20-100-01
Select CIP & Miscellaneous Streets
Zone 1
Plate 1.1 - Project Limits Table