AGENDA
ALISO VIEJO CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 17, 2026
7:00 PM
CITY HALL
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
12 JOURNEY, ALISO VIEJO, CA
TELECONFERENCE LOCATION*:
104 Mule Deer Rd
West Montana, MO 59758
*Pursuant to Government Code Section 54953(b), a member of the City Council will participate in this meeting via teleconference.
Mayor Max Duncan
Mayor Pro Tem Mike Munzing
Councilmember Tiffany Ackley
Councilmember Tim Zandbergen
Councilmember Garrett Dwyer
WELCOME to the City of Aliso Viejo City Council meeting. Those persons wishing to address the City Council are requested to complete and submit to the City Clerk a “Request to Address City Council” form available at the entrance to the City Council Chamber s. Speakers will be called at the appropriate time as their interested matter is heard. COMMENTS WILL BE LIMITED TO THREE MINUTES PER SPEAKER. Council proceedings are recorded.
It is the City's intention to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) . If you need special assistance to participate in the meeting, the City will make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility and/or accommodations. [28 CFR 35.102- 35.104 ADA Title II] Please contact the City Clerk's Office at (949) 425- 2505 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting.
Regular meetings of the City Council are held on the first and third Wednesday of the month at the City Hall Council Chambers, 12 Journey, Aliso Viejo. Copies of the agenda are available in the lobby at City Hall on the Thursday preceding a regularly scheduled City Council meeting. All communications received by the City regarding an agenda item have been included in the agenda materials. Supplemental documents relating to specific agenda items, including communications received after agenda delivery, are presented at the dais and in the Public Copy agenda binder at the time of the meeting. Supplemental documents are also available for review in the City Clerk's office, 12 Journey, Aliso Viejo. For more information, please contact City Hall at (949) 425- 2505.
This meeting will be broadcast live on Cox Communications Channel 851, AT&T U -Verse Channel 99 and the City's website. By attending the City Council Meeting, you are giving your permission to be televised. The Council Meetings are rebroadcast on Wednesday at 7:00 p.m. on Cox Communications Channel 851, AT&T U -Verse Channel 99, and can be viewed on the internet at www.avcity.org.
BRETT CHANNING SCOTT C. SMITH MARIA KENDIG
CITY MANAGER CITY ATTORNEY CITY CLERK
1 PLEASE SILENCE ALL CELL PHONES AND OTHER
ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT WHILE CITY COUNCIL IS IN SESSION
ROLL CALL
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION:
1. SPECIAL PRESENTATION:
1.1 BUSINESS SPOTLIGHT - SOKA UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA
2. ADDITIONS, DELETIONS, REORDERING TO THE AGENDA:
3. COMMUNITY INPUT:
Members of the public wishing to address the City Council are requested to complete and submit to the City Clerk a "Request to Address City Council" form available at the entrance to the City Council Chambers. In compliance with the Brown Act, no discussion or action may be taken on comments received at this time, except the City Council may briefly respond to statements made or questions posed. Comments are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker.
4. CONSENT CALENDAR:
All matters listed on the Consent Calendar will be acted upon by one vote unless members of the City Council, or staff request a matter to be discussed and/or removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. Items removed from the Consent Calendar will be discussed and voted upon immediately following City Council action on the remainder of the Consent Calendar.
4.1 WAIVE THE READING OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Recommended Action: Approve the reading by title only of all ordinances and resolutions wherein the titles appear on the public agenda; said titles shall be determined to have been read by title, and further reading is waived.
4.2 APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Recommended Actions:
1. Approve the minutes as submitted for the March 31, 2026, Special Meeting.
2. Approve the minutes as submitted for the June 3, 2026, Regular Meeting.
DRAFT 2026-03-31 Special Meeting Minutes
DRAFT 2026-06-03 Regular Meeting Minutes
2 4.3 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING
OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS FOR QUALIFYING HOUSING PROJECTS
AND DETERMINING THE ACTION TO BE EXEMPT FROM CEQA
Recommended Action: Conduct a second reading and adopt an Ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 2026-254: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ALISO VIEJO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ALISO VIEJO
MUNICIPAL CODE TO ESTABLISH OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS FOR
QUALIFYING HOUSING PROJECTS AND DETERMINING THE ACTION TO BE
EXEMPT FROM CEQA
Staff Report
Attachment 1 - Ordinance 2026-254
ODS Manual
4.4 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
Recommended Action: Ratify accounts payable checks and electronic funds transfers issued between May 22, 2026, and June 4, 2026, in the amount of $212,361.86.
Staff Report
Attachment - Accounts Payable Report
4.5 FISCAL YEAR 26 -27 PROJECT LIST FOR ROAD MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION ACCOUNT FUNDING (SB 1)
Recommended Action: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Aliso Viejo which adopts a list of projects for fiscal year 2026- 27 funded by SB 1: The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017.
Staff Report
Attachment - Resolution
4.6 RENEWED MEASURE M ELIGIBILITY
Recommended Actions:
1. Adopt a 7-year Capital Improvements Program (CIP) for Street Projects;
2. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Aliso Viejo concerning the status of the Pavement Management Plan; and
3. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Aliso Viejo concerning the status of the Local Signal Synchronization Plan.
Staff Report
Attachment 1 - 7-year Capital Improvements Program for Street Projects Attachment 2 - Pavement Management Plan Resolution
Attachment 3 - Pavement Management Plan
Attachment 4 - Resolution for Local Signal Synchronization Plan Attachment 5 - Local Signal Synchronization Plan
3 4.7 INVESTMENT POLICY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-27
Recommended Action: Adopt a Resolution approving the Investment Policy for Fiscal Year 2026-27 and rescinding Resolution No. 2025-06 in its entirety.
Staff Report
Attachment 1 - Resolution
Attachment 2 - FY 2026-27 Investment Policy - Clean
Attachment 3 - FY 2026-27 Investment Policy - Redline
Attachment 4 - Resolution 2025-06
4.8 AWARD CONTRACT TO AXXESS DOOR COMMERCIAL SOLUTIONS FOR
THE ALISO VIEJO RANCH AUTOMATIC DOOR (ADA) UPGRADE PROJECT Recommended Actions:
1. Approve the contract documents, specifications, and plans for the Aliso Viejo Ranch Automatic Door (ADA) Upgrade Project;
2. Award a contract in the amount of $64,935.46 to Axxess Door Commercial Solutions as the lowest responsible bidder for the Aliso Viejo Ranch Automatic Door (ADA) Upgrade Project;
3. Authorize the City Manager to execute a contract with Axxess Door Commercial Solutions;
4. Authorize City staff to provide total compensation to Axxess Door Commercial Solutions up to $67,435.67 plus $3,246.77 (5% of the contract amount) to allow for contingencies, totaling $68,182.23; and
5. Declare this project categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) process Per Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Chapter 3, Article 19, Section 15301 (Class 1: Existing Facilities).
Staff Report
Attachment - Contract with Axxess Door Commercial Solutions
4.9 THIRD AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH MIKE LINARES, INC. FOR CDBG ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
Recommended Actions:
1. Approve a Third Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Aliso Viejo and Mike Linares, Inc. to extend the term of the agreement and to increase the total contract amount to $183,800; and
2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the third amendment to the contract.
Staff Report
Attachment 1 - Original Professional Services Agreement Attachment 2 - 3rd Amendment Agreement
4 PUBLIC HEARING:
5.1 PROPOSITION 218 HEARING FOR SOLID WASTE RATE INCREASE Recommended Actions:
1. Conduct a public hearing on the solid waste rate increases; and
2. Adopt a Resolution adopting solid waste service charges.
Staff Report
Attachment - Resolution
Presentation
DISCUSSION:
6.1 PUMP TRACK PROJECT
Recommended Action:
Provide direction to staff on the approval or disapproval of the Pump Track Capital Improvement Project initially proposed by Mayor Max Duncan for Fiscal Year 2026-27. Approval of the project would include the following:
1. Staff working with Aliso Viejo Community Association (AVCA) to obtain approval for a location and a land- use agreement for the construction and operation of a pump track.
2. Staff undergoing the purchasing process for the design and construction of the pump track, which may include using a cooperative purchasing agreement. Contracts for the design and construction of the project will be brought to City Council for approval.
Staff Report
Attachment 1 - Presentation
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT:
ANNOUNCEMENTS / COUNCIL COMMENTS / COMMITTEE UPDATES:
ADJOURNMENT: The Regular City Council Meeting scheduled for July 1, 2026, has been cancelled. The next Regular City Council Meeting will be held on Wednesday, July 15, 2026, at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 12 Journey, Aliso Viejo, California.
5 CITY OF ALISO VIEJO
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING
March 31, 2026, 9:00 a.m.
Aliso Viejo Center
31 Santa Barbara Drive
Aliso Viejo, California
CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Duncan called the Special Meeting of the City Council of the City of Aliso Viejo to order at 9:00 a.m.
ROLL CALL:
PRESENT: MAYOR MAX DUNCAN
MAYOR PRO TEM MIKE MUNZING
COUNCILMEMBER TIFFANY ACKLEY
COUNCILMEMBER GARRETT DWYER
COUNCILMEMBER TIM A. ZANDBERGEN
ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: SCOTT SMITH, CITY ATTORNEY
CLOSED SESSION:
PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT
Pursuant to Government Code section 54957(b)(1)
Title: City Manager
CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6
Agency Designated Representatives: City Manager Recruitment Ad Hoc Committee
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
None.
REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION:
City Attorney Scott Smith stated no reportable action was taken.
ADJOURNMENT: Mayor Duncan adjourned the meeting at 1 p.m. to April 1 , 2026, Regular City Council Meeting.
6
Special Meeting Minutes
City Council Meeting
Respectfully submitted: Approved by:
________________________ ________________________
LAUREN TORRES MAX DUNCAN
DEPUTY CITY CLERK MAYOR
7 CITY OF ALISO VIEJO
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING
June 3, 2026
Council Chambers, City Hall, 12 Journey
Aliso Viejo, California
CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Duncan called the Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Aliso Viejo to order at 7:02 p.m.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: MAYOR MAX DUNCAN
MAYOR PRO TEM MIKE MUNZING
COUNCILMEMBER TIFFANY ACKLEY
COUNCILMEMBER GARRETT DWYER
COUNCILMEMBER TIM A. ZANDBERGEN
ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: BRETT CHANNING, CITY MANAGER
SCOTT SMITH, CITY ATTORNEY
ANN EIFERT, DIRECTOR OF FINANCIAL SERVICES
SO KIM, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
SHAUN PELLETIER, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
MARIA KENDIG, DIRECTOR OF GOVERNMENT SERVICES/CITY
CLERK
LIZZY MENDOZA, RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES
MANAGER
ISAAC AZIZ, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MANAGER
CAPT. RYAN BUHR, ALISO VIEJO POLICE SERVICES
DIVISION CHIEF REID GIBSON, ORANGE COUNTY FIRE AUTHORITY
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Brett Channing led the Pledge of Allegiance.
1. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS:
None.
2. ADDITIONS, DELETIONS, REORDERING TO THE AGENDA:
None.
3. COMMUNITY INPUT:
1. Marie commented on market rate housing availability, illegal short-term rentals posted on web and noted that city had not applied for state grant funding for affordable housing and sustainable communities.
8
Minutes of the Regular
City Council Meeting
4. CONSENT CALENDAR:
Motion: Councilmember Ackley moved, and Mayor Pro Tem Munzing seconded to approve the recommended actions for items 4.1, 4.2, and 4.4 through 4.14. Motion carried 5-0. Councilmember Ackley pulled item 4.3 for separate action.
4.1 APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Recommended Actions:
1. Approve the minutes as submitted for the May 20, 2026, Regular Meeting.
2. Approve the minutes as submitted for the May 27, 2026, Special and Adjourned Regular Meetings.
4.2 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
Recommended Action: Ratify accounts payable checks and electronic funds transfers issued between May 8, 2026, and May 21, 2026, in the amount of $574,630.82.
4.3 TREASURER’S STATEMENT – APRIL 2026
Recommended Action: Receive and file the April 2026 Treasurer’s Statement.
Councilmember Ackley inquired about negative CFD funds and long-term interest rates. Director of Financial Services Eifert provided background information.
Motion: Councilmember Ackley moved, and Councilmember Dwyer seconded to approve the recommended actions for Items 4.3. Motion carried 5-0.
4.4 BIENNIAL REVIEW OF THE CITY’S CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE Recommended Action: Direct staff to conduct a review of the City’s Conflict of Interest Code and return to the City Council with its findings and any recommended updates by October 1, 2026.
4.5 GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION – NOVEMBER 3, 2026
Recommended Actions:
1. Adopt Resolution 2026-05 C alling for the holding of a Regular General Municipal Election to be held on Tuesday, November 3, 2026, for the election of certain officers as required by the provisions of the laws of the State of California relating to general law cities;
2. Adopt Resolution 2026-06 C alling for the holding of a Special Municipal Election to be held on Tuesday, November 3, 2 026, for the election of certain officers as required by the provisions of the laws of the State of California relating to general law cities;
3. Adopt Resolution 2026-07 R equesting the Orange County Board of Supervisors to consolidate the Regular Genera l Municipal Election to be held 9
Minutes of the Regular
City Council Meeting
on Tuesday, November 3, 2026, with the Statewide General Election to be held on the same date pursuant to Section 10403 of the California Elections Code;
4. Adopt Resolution 2026-08 Requesting the Orange County Board of Supervisors to consolidate the Special Municipal Election to be held on Tuesday, November 3, 2026, with the Statewide General Election to be held on the same date pursuant to Section 10403 of the California Elections Code; and
5. Adopt Resolution 2026-09 Adopting regulations pertaining to candidate statements submitted to the voters for an election to be held on Tuesday, November 3, 2026.
4.6 APPROVAL OF COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITIES
OF ALISO VIEJO, LAGUNA NIGUEL, LAGUNA HILLS, AND MISSION VIEJO FOR
THE ALICIA PARKWAY REGIONAL TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION
PROGRAM PROJECT
Recommended Actions:
1. Approve the Cooperative Agreement by and between the City of Laguna Niguel and the cities of Aliso Viejo, Laguna Hills, and Mission Viejo for the Alicia Parkway Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program Project;
2. Authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute the agreement; and
3. Authorize the City Manager to execute future amendments to the agreement.
4.7 AWARD CONTRACT TO GMU ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS FOR ON -CALL
GEOTECHNICAL AND MATERIAL TESTING SERVICES
Recommended Actions:
1. Award a contract to GMU Engineers & Geologists, Inc. (GMU) to perform geotechnical and materials testing services; and
2. Authorize the City Manager to execute a professional services contract with GMU for an amount not to exceed $200,000.
4.8 SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT WITH NV5, INC. FOR
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION SERVICES
Recommended Actions:
1. Approve a second amendment to the agreement with NV5, Inc. to perform construction inspection services that renews the agreement for an additional one-year term and increases the total compensation under the agreement by $360,000 for a total contract amount of $660,000; and
2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the second amendment to the contract.
4.9 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT WITH NV5, INC. FOR ON -CALL
CIVIL ENGINEERING SERVICES
Recommended Actions:
1. Approve a first amendment to the agreement wit h NV5, Inc. to perform on -call civil engineering services that renew the agreement for an additional one -year 10
Minutes of the Regular
City Council Meeting
term and increases the total compensation under the agreement by $50,000 for a total contract amount of $100,000; and
2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the first amendment to the contract.
4.10 THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT WITH NIEVES LANDSCAPE, LLC.
FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES
Recommended Action:
1. Approve a third amendment to the agreement with Nieves Landscape, LLC to perform landscape maintenance services that renews the agreement for an additional five -year term and increases the total compensation under the agreement by $1,090,000.00 total contract amount of $2,180,000; and
2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the third amendment to the contract.
4.11 SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT WITH GREAT SCOTT TREE SERVICES, INC. FOR TREE MAINTENANCE SERVICES
Recommended Actions:
1. Approve a second amendment to the agreement with Great Scott Tree Services, Inc. to renew the agreement for an additional three-year term for tree maintenance services, and increase the total compensation amount by $101,000 to $277,000; and
2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the second amendment to the contract.
4.12 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE DECLARING PRIMA
FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN CITY STREETS
Recommended Action: Conduct a second reading and adopt an Ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 2026-253 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ALISO VIEJO CALIFOR NIA, DECLARING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN CITY STREETS.
4.13 AGREEMENT WITH ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 CROSSING GUARD SERVICES
Recommended Action: Authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement with All City Management Services, Inc. for school crossing guard services for fiscal year (FY) 2026-27.
4.14 AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF ORANGE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026 -27
LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES
Recommended Action: Approve and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement with the County of Orange for Fiscal Year 2026 -27 law enforcement services in the amount of $11,550,802.
11
Minutes of the Regular
City Council Meeting
5. PUBLIC HEARING:
5.1 REPORT ON STAFF VACANCIES, RECRUITMENT, AND RETENTION
EFFORTS
Recommended Actions:
1. Conduct the public hearing; and
2. Receive and file the report on staff vacancies, recruitment, and retention efforts.
Mayor Duncan opened the Hearing. There were no speakers and the hearing closed.
Motion: Councilmember Zandbergen moved and Councilmember Dwyer seconded to approve the recommended actions. Motion carried 5-0.
5.2 ZONING CODE AMENDMENT ZA -2026-01004: OBJECTIVE DESIGN
STANDARDS FOR QUALIFYING RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS
Recommended Actions:
1. Find that Zoning Code Amendment ZA -2026-02004 is exempt from the provisions of the Calif ornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines; and
2. Introduce for first reading of an Ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 2026 - 254 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALISO
VIEJO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ALISO VIEJO MUNICIPAL CODE TO
ESTABLISH OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS FOR QUALIFYING
HOUSING PROJECTS AND DETERMINING THE ACTION TO BE EXEMPT FROM CEQA.
Director of Community Development Kim introduced Allen Lunas, consultant from PlaceWorks who provided an overview and responded to questions from Councilmembers. Planning Consultant presented the proposed Objective Design Standards for qualifying residential projects. The presentation reviewed the purpose and applicability of the standards, r elated zoning code amendments, stakeholder outreach, and proposed site planning, architectural, and large -scale residential design requirements.
Mayor Duncan opened the Hearing.
The following spoke on the matter:
1. Marie T suggested community input be included in addition to developers.
There were no other speakers, and the Mayor closed the Hearing.
Motion: Councilmember Ackley moved and Councilmember Dwyer seconded to approve the recommended actions. Motion carried 5-0.
12
Minutes of the Regular
City Council Meeting
6. DISCUSSION:
6.1 ADOPTION OF TELECONFERENCING DISRUPTION POLICY AND
COMMUNITY OUTREACH AND PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT PLAN IN
COMPLIANCE WITH SENATE BILL 707 (SB707)
Recommended Actions:
1. Adopt Resolution 2026-10, a new City Council policy addressing a disruption of telephonic or internet servi ce during City Council meetings, in compliance with Senate Bill 707 and Government Code Sections 54953.9 and 54953.10; and
2. Approve the SB 707 Community Outreach and Public Engagement Plan to encourage participation by historically underrepresented and unde rserved communities.
Director of Government Services/City Clerk Kendig provided an overview of new legislation and policy requirements.
Motion: Councilmember Zandbergen moved and Councilmember Ackley seconded to approve the recommended actions. Motion carried 5-0.
6.2 PROPOSED ANNUAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-27
Recommended Actions:
1. Adopt Resolution 2026-11 adopting the Annual Budget for Fiscal Year 2026 - 27;
2. Adopt Resolution 2026-12 approving updated City Salary Schedules to include cost-of-living adjustments of 3.2% and the addition of Principal Civil Engineer and Principal Planner job classifications, effective July 1, 2026; and
3. Adopt Resolution 2026-13 setting the annual appropriations limit for Fiscal Year 2026-27.
Director of Financial Services Eifer presented proposed budget and responded to questions from Councilmembers. The City Council requested that a 5 -year Forecast be presented within the next 60 days.
Motion: Mayor Pro Tem Munzing moved and Councilmember Zandbergen seconded to approve the recommended actions. Motion carried 5-0.
7. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT:
City Manager Channing reported that he was entering the third week of his tenure and expressed appreciation to City staff for their efforts in maintaining operations over the past six months. He highlighted the recent budget adoption and encouraged residen ts to participate in the City's summer recreation classes and camps, noting that scholarships are available for eligible participants. He also announced the upcoming Shakespeare by the Sea performance at Soka University on July 23, 2026, and reminded the c ommunity 13
Minutes of the Regular
City Council Meeting
that applications for the Citizen of the Year, Senior of the Year, and Youth of the Year awards will be accepted through June 30, 2026.
8. ANNOUNCEMENTS / COUNCIL COMMENTS / COMMITTEE UPDATES:
Councilmember Ackley:
Inquired about the deadline for submitting nominations for Citizen of the Year. City Manager Channing stated that nominations are due by June 30 and that the information is posted online.
Noted that any additional comments will be submitted in writing.
Councilmember Dwyer:
Announced the City's upcoming 25th Anniversary Celebration, including recognition of the winning anniversary logo. He noted that the City will host a booth highlighting summer programs and activities and that a community celebration is scheduled for July 15, 2026.
Reported that the Orange County Mosquito and Vector Control District detected West Nile virus activity and encouraged residents to eliminate standing water and take precautions to avoid mosquito bites. Additional information is available at OCVector.org.
Attended the Memorial Day ceremony at El Toro Memorial Park and recognized those who have served in the military.
Attended the Orange County Fire Authority's Best and Bravest Awards Ceremony on May 29, 2026, and congratulated Division Chief Reid Gibson on being recognized as a Chief of the Year nominee.
Attended the Boys & Girls Club Youth of the Month event on May 21, 2026. Attended the Second Harvest Great Futures Market food distribution event held earlier that day.
Councilmember Zandbergen:
Attended the Memorial Day ceremony at El Toro Memorial Park. Attended the Orange County Fire Authority's Best and Bravest Awards Ceremony. Requested discussion regarding the placement of additional speed feedback signs at strategic locations throughout the City. He sug gested evaluating potential permanent locations near The Ranch and along both sides of Aliso Creek Road and exploring partnership opportunities with the Aliso Viejo Community Association regarding use of its electronic signs.
Inquired about the schedule for bicycle lane striping and upcoming street resurfacing projects.
Mayor Pro Tem Munzing:
Attended a Memorial Day observance.
Participated in the Aliso Viejo Community Association and City Subcommittee meeting, where several matters of mutual interest were discussed. Commented on recent reductions to speed limits within the City. 14
Minutes of the Regular
City Council Meeting
Attended the Orange County Fire Authority's Best and Bravest Awards Ceremony in his capacity as an OCFA Board Member and congratulated Division Chief Reid Gibson on his recognition.
Reported that the Orange County Fire Authority is finalizing labor negotiations with its firefighters.
Wished residents a safe and enjoyable summer.
Mayor Duncan
Commented on the positive and productive meeting between the City and the Aliso Viejo Community Association Subcommittee.
Reflected on the life and contributions of Ron Withnell and requested that the meeting be adjourned in his memory.
9. ADJOURNMENT: Mayor Duncan adjourned the meeting at 9:16 p.m. to the next regularly scheduled City Council meeting on Wednesday, June 17, 2026, at 7:00 p.m.
Adjourned In Memory of
Ron Whitmill
Respectfully submitted: Approved by:
____________________________ _____________________________
MARIA KENDIG MAX DUNCAN
CITY CLERK MAYOR
15 City of Aliso Viejo
AGENDA ITEM
DATE: June 17, 2026
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Maria Kendig, Director of Government Services/City Clerk
SUBJECT: SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE
ESTABLISHING OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS FOR QUALIFYING
HOUSING PROJECTS AND DETERMINING THE ACTION TO BE
EXEMPT FROM CEQA
Recommended Action:
Conduct a second reading and adopt an Ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 2026 -254: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALISO VIEJO, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING THE ALISO VIEJO MUNICIPAL CODE TO
ESTABLISH OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS FOR
QUALIFYING HOUSING PROJECTS AND DETERMINING THE
ACTION TO BE EXEMPT FROM CEQA
Fiscal Impact:
None.
Discussion:
On June 3, 2026 , the City Council approved the introduction and first reading of the subject Ordinances by 5-0 vote. If adopted, the Ordinances will take effect 30 days after adoption.
Attachment:
1. Ordinance
16 60367.01100\45049645.1
ORDINANCE NO. 2026-254
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALISO
VIEJO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ALISO VIEJO MUNICIPAL
CODE TO ESTABLISH OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS FOR
QUALIFYING HOUSING PROJECTS AND DETERMINING THE
ACTION TO BE EXEMPT FROM CEQA
WHEREAS, in recent years , legislation, including Senate Bill 35 ( “SB 35 ”), requires certain housing projects to be reviewed using objective design standards (“ODS”) in order to address the statewide housing shortage and streamline approval of housing projects; and
WHEREAS, objective standards are measurable, clearly defined, verifiable, and quantifiable and do not rely on personal or subjective judgment by a reviewing authority; and
WHEREAS, the City of Aliso Viejo (“City”) currently applies the design standards set forth in Section 15.62 of the Aliso Viejo Municipal Code (“AVMC”), which include standards that are subjective in nature and cannot be applied to projects eligible for ministerial approval under SB 35; and
WHEREAS, in November 2025, the City received funding through the Orange County Council of Governments (“OCCOG”) Regional Early Action Planning (“REAP 2.0”) grant program to prepare ODS; and
WHEREAS, the City has developed an ODS Manual with assistance from PlaceWorks, to provide detailed, objective criteria covering aspects of design , including, but not limited to, site planning, open space, building mass and scale, and materials; and
WHEREAS, the City conducted outreach to the development community, including holding a Developer Roundtable on May 14, 2026 to introduce the concept of ODS and solicit public and stakeholder input on the draft ODS Manual, and incorporated feedback where appropriate; and
WHEREAS, on May 21, 2026, a public notice of the public hearing was published in the Laguna Niguel News; and
WHEREAS, on June 3, 202 6, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law and introduced an Ordinance amending Section s 15.62.010 and
15.62.040 of the Aliso Viejo Municipal Code to establish ODS; and
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
17
Ordinance No. 2026-254
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Aliso Viejo does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The recitals above are each incorporated by reference and adopted as findings by the City Council.
SECTION 2. CEQA. The City Council finds that Zoning Code Amendment Z A- 2026-01004 is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, which provides that a project is exempt from CEQA if the activity is covered by the common sense exemption that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no po ssibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Zoning Code Amendment ZA -2026-01004 will not have a significant effect on the environment as it simply establishes objective desi gn review standards for residential projects and does not authorize construction or development. Therefore, the City Council finds that this Ordinance is exempt from CEQA. As the City receives individual qualifying residential project applications, project s subject to discretionary review will be reviewed in accordance with CEQA and projects subject to ministerial approval under SB 35 will be exempt from CEQA (pursuant to Government Code section 21080(b)(1)).
SECTION 3. Approval of Findings for a Zoning Code Amendment. In accordance with AVMC section 15.78.050(E), the City Council hereby makes the following findings of fact and approves a Zoning Code Amendment ZA-2026-01004 to adopt the Objective Design Standards Manual to establish clear and measurable cri teria for qualifying residential projects, as set forth in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
1. Public Welfare. Approval of Zoning Code Amendment ZA-2026-01004 will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and general welfare. Zoning Code A mendment ZA-2026-01004 maintains appropriate development standards and land use compatibility and will not result in adverse impacts to surrounding properties or the community.
2. General Plan Consistency. Zoning C ode Amendment ZA-2026-01004 is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the general plan and any applicable specific plan. Zoning Code Amendment ZA-2026-01004 supports General Plan Goal H -1, “Encourage a diversity of housing types and provide affordability levels within Aliso Viejo to meet the needs of community residents,” Goal H-2, “Create safe and aesthetically pleasing neighborhoods, and provide adequate housing to meet the needs of all household types and income groups,” and Goal H -3b, “Increase the supply of affordable housing in high opportunity areas.”
SECTION 4. Code Amendment. Section 15.62.10 of the Aliso Viejo Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
18
Ordinance No. 2026-254
15.62.010 Purpose and intent.
This chapter sets out standards for physical design in Aliso Viejo. It provides architectural, landscape and site planning criteria for the design and review of proposed commercial, office, industrial, residential, and other development within the city. [Ord. 2011 -131 § 3 (Exh. A)].
This chapter operates in conjunction with the City’s adopted Objective Design Standards, which provide quantifiable design metrics for certain housing projects in Aliso Viejo.
SECTION 5. Code Amendment. Section 15.62.40 of the Aliso Viejo Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
15.62.040 Applicability of design standards.
A. Applicability.
1. Projects Subject to Design Review. Except for those projects identified in subsection (A)(2) of this section, the following projects shall be subject to design review under the provisions of this chapter or the City’s Objective Design Standards:
Projects w hich require a site development or conditional use permit pursuant to Chapter 15.74 AVMC and which: (a) involve new building construction; or (b) involve exterior alterations to existing buildings and/or sites. For such alterations, the design standards shall apply only to the portions of the project being altered and only design measures connected to the proposed improvements shall be required.
2. Projects Not Subject to Design Review. The following projects are not subject to design review:
a. Construction of an individual single -family detached home by an owner-builder;
b. Alterations to existing single-family detached homes; c. Interior alterations to existing buildings;
d. Applications which do not involve building construction.
3. Projects Subject to Objective Design Standards. The following projects are subject to design review under the City’s adopted Objective Design Standards, in lieu of the provisions of this chapter:
a. Single-family and/or duplex neighborhoods, multi -family, and mixed-use developments that dedicate at least 20 percent of base units as affordable to low income households on sites identified in the City’s Housing Element to accommodate the l ower income regional housing needs allocation ( RHNA), consistent with Government Code Section 65583.2, subdivisions (c), (h), and (i). b. Single-family and/or duplex neighborhoods, multi -family, and mixed-use developments that dedicate at least 10 percent of base units as affordable to low income households, on sites that are not 19
Ordinance No. 2026-254
identified in the City’s adopted Housing Element and meet all SB 35 eligibility requirements pursuant to Government Code Section 65913.4.
c. Substantiative renovations or structural alte rations of the building types listed in subsection (A)(3)(a) and (A)(3)(b), when 50 percent or more of the exterior walls or roof are demolished as part of the renovation.
B. Architectural Standards.
1. Commercial Standards. The commercial architectural standards of AVMC 15.62.090 shall apply to the following projects:
a. Freestanding retail buildings, shopping centers, restaurants, and other commercial development.
b. Civic centers.
c. Institutional buildings, such as churches, libraries, museums, schools, and colleges.
d. Small-scale hotels and hospitals, three stories or less. e. Mixed use projects which are predominantly commercial but which also includ e other uses within the same building or cluster of buildings (e.g., residential units above retail stores or professional offices within a commercial building or shopping center), excepting those projects subject to the City’s Objective Design Standards.
2. Office and Industrial Standards. The office-industrial architectural standards of AVMC 15.62.100 shall apply to the following projects:
a. Office and industrial buildings and parks.
b. Utility substations.
c. Large-scale hotels and hospitals, four stories or above. d. Mixed use projects which are predominantly office or industrial but which also contain small incidental commercial uses, such as a sandwich shop.
3. Office and Industrial Buildings in Commercial Areas. Notwithstanding the provisions of subsections (A)(1) and (2) of this section, in order to promote consistent design quality within the community’s retail commercial areas, the city shall have the discretion of applying the commercial architectural standards of AVMC 15.62.090 to office, industrial, or other buildings proposed for such commercial areas.
4. Residential Standards. The residential architectural standards of AVMC 15.62.120 shall apply to projects with two or more residential units, excepting those projects subject to the City’s Objective Design Standards.
C. Determinations Regarding Applicability. When it is not immediately apparent whether a proposed project is subject to the provisions of this chapter under the 20
Ordinance No. 2026-254
categories listed in this section, the director shall decide. The director’s decision shall be based on his or her determination of the most applicable category of the project and the goal and objectives set out in AVMC 15.62.020. [Ord. 2011 -131 § 3 (Exh. A)].
D. Amendments to the Objective Design Standards Manual. Any future amendments to the Objective Design Standards Manual shall be adopted by City Council resolution.
SECTION 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance takes effect 30 days after its adoption.
SECTION 7. Publication. The City Clerk is directed to certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and post or publish this Ordinance as required by law.
SECTION 8. Custodian of Records. The custodian of records for this Ordinance is the City Clerk and the records compris ing the administrative record are located at 12 Journey, Suite 100, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656.
SECTION 9. Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance or its application to any person or circumstance is held to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction , such invalidity has no effect on the other pro visions or applications of the O rdinance that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this extent, the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. The City Council declares t hat it would have adopted this Ordinance irrespective of the invalidity of any portion thereof.
PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this __ day of June 2026.
____________________________
Max Duncan
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Best Best & Krieger LLP
___________________________
Scott Smith,
City Attorney
21
Ordinance No. 2026-254
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS
CITY OF ALISO VIEJO )
I, Maria Kendig, City Clerk of the City of Aliso Viejo, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2026 -254 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at the regular meeting of the City Council on the 3rd day of June, 2026, and thereafter, said Ordinance was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on the ___ day of June 2026, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Councilmembers: _
NOES: Councilmembers: _
ABSENT: Councilmembers: _
______________________________
Maria Kendig,
City Clerk
22
Ordinance No. 2026-254
EXHIBIT A
OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS MANUAL
23 RESIDENTIAL
Objective Design Standards
City of Aliso Viejo
Adopted XX, 2026
24 ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Prepared for:
Funded by:
Prepared by:
Adopted by City Council:
25 TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Applicability
2.1 Access and Circulation
2.2 Streets
2.3 Off Street Parking Bays
2.4 Screening of Equipment and Facilities
2.5 Outdoor Lighting
2.6 Pedestrian Circulation
2.7 Bikeways and Equestrian Trails
2.8 Parks and Open Space
2.9 Trash Enclosures
3.1 Color and Style
06 09
10 16
16 16
16 17
17 17
19 26
Cont.TABLE OF CONTENTS
3.2 Architectural Styles
3.3 Building Elevations
3.4 Roofs
3.5 Materials
3.6 Doors, Windows, and Trim
3.7 Garages and Carports
3.8 Accessory Elements
4.1 Threshold and Applicability
4.2 Site Planing
4.3 Architecture and Materials
4.4 Landscape and Open Space
4.5 Mixed Use
36 39
40 41
42 43
45 46
47 48
48 27
Chapter 1
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Applicability
INTRODUCTION
28 CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
6 1.2 State Requirements
Senate Bill 330 (SB 330) established the Housing Crisis Act of 2019 (HCA) to increase residential unit development; protect existing housing inventory; and expedite permit processing.
In addition, SB 35 requires local entities to streamline the approval by providing a ministerial process through which a project is only reviewed against objective standards.
For the purposes of SB 330 and SB 35, an eligible “housing development project” must be a multifamily or mixed-use project (with at least 2/3rd of the square footage being for residential uses).
Under these laws, cities and counties are prohibited from denying a housing development project or reducing its
density based on a subjective design standard. A project can only be reviewed against “objective, quantifiable, written development standards, conditions and policies,” and can only be denied if certain findings described in Gov. Code §65589.5(j) are met.
1.1 Introduction
Development and design standards regulate development
intensity, style, size, and orientation. Objective design standards (ODS) are measurable, verifiable, and quantifiable, supporting consistent housing design in the community.
Ultimately, the standards contained in this document will provide for a predictable and equitable path for new housing in the City of Aliso Viejo.
This document provides clear and useful standards for
the design of residential development in Aliso Viejo.
These standards are written as minimum design standards for site and structure design but also offer various
recommendations and guidelines for quality and character.
Proposed projects must comply with all applicable building permit requirements, zoning code requirements, and other development standards found in the City of Aliso Viejo’s Development Code (AVMC).
29 CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
7 1.3 Applicability
Refer to Section 15.62.040 of the AVMC for applicability provisions and the list of project types that are required to be reviewed through these Objective Design Standards.
These standards do not apply to minor renovations (i.e. when less than 50 percent of the exterior walls or roof are demolished as part of the renovation) and routine
maintenance of residential (single-family, multi-family, and mixed use) developments, even if such projects are
qualifying SB 35 projects.
For SB 35 developments including, spanning or creating
multiple lots, these standards apply to all lots proposed for multi-family housing, mixed-use developments, and any
associated amenities, open space, or utilities that would serve multi-family or mixed-use units.
These standards are in addition to the standards of the underlying base zone. In the event of conflicting standards between these standards and the base zone, the more
restrictive standard shall apply. For projects located in a Specific Plan, and if there is a conflict between the City’s ODS and the Specific Plan’s objective standards, the Specific Plan’s objective standards shall prevail. Proposed projects must also comply with all other applicable local and state ordinances and codes.
1.4 Document Organization
These objective design standards serve as a stand-alone illustrated document, empowered by appropriate reference within the City’s Development Code.
The standards contained in this document are split into three chapters. Chapter 2 consists of site planning standards, including those pertaining to access and circulation, streets, off-street parking, screening of equipment and facilities, outdoor lighting, pedestrian circulation, parks and open space, and trash enclosures.
Chapter 3 includes architectural standards, and includes a menu of architectural styles new residential development in Aliso Viejo shall adhere to. Standards pertaining to building elevations, roofs, materials, doors, windows, and garages are also included in this chapter.
Finally, Chapter 4 includes additional standards for
large-scale residential, which is defined as residential developments at 25 or more units per acre.
30 Chapter 2
2.1 Access and Circulation
2.2 Streets
2.3 Off Street Parking Bays
2.4 Screening of Equipment and Facilities
2.5 Outdoor Lighting
2.6 Pedestrian Circulation
2.7 Bikeways and Equestrian Trails
2.8 Parks and Open Space
2.9 Trash Enclosures
SITE PLANNING
31 CHAPTER 2
SITE PLANNING
9 2.1 Access and Circulation
1. Connections to Existing Network. Where an existing public or private street terminates at the project boundary, the project shall align any connecting internal street or pedestrian pathway within 15 degrees of the existing alignment unless prevented by topography, easements, or existing utilities
2. Entries.
a. Project Identification. Identification signs shall be provided for all residential projects. Such signs shall conform to the limitations on size, height, and placement set out in Chapter 15.34 AVMC.
b. Entry Location. Project entries shall not be located closer than 100 feet from an intersection/ curb return. If the parcel frontage is less than 100 feet from curb return the curb cut shall be located as far from the curb return as possible. A curb return is the point where the radius of a curve or intersection ends.
c. Entry Design. Entry landscape treatment shall be in accordance with the landscape standards of AVMC 15.62.060.
d. Gated Entries. Gate-guarded entries shall be regulated in accordance with city regulations governing gate-guarded neighborhoods as set out in AVMC 15.14.200.
3. Transit. Projects with a bus or transit stop along its frontage shall incorporate turnouts according to the standards of the applicable transit agency or school district. 32 CHAPTER 2
SITE PLANNING
10 2.2 Streets
Residential developments shall feature a circulation system with a clear hierarchy of streets, either public or private, that allows for efficient ingress and egress of vehicles, safe and convenient pedestrian connections throughout the development, and other associated infrastructure. An exhibit demonstrating that all portions of a project’s roadway system adheres to one of the following street types shall be included. Street types shall not be combined with another street type. Public streets contained in a residential development shall adhere to AVMC 14.10.060. Private streets shall adhere to AVMC 14.10.040 and the design standards contained in this document.
Residential alleys provide dedicated
vehicle access to the garages of
individual residential units. Residential
alleys are the least pedestrian-oriented
street type.
Lane courts provide both vehicular
and pedestrian access to multiple
residences. Front doors open onto the
lane court, which features distinct
paving to demarcate the court’s dual
functions.
Neighborhood entries serve as the primary access point(s) to a residential neighborhood, and may feature gates, special landscape treatments, and monumentation.
Residential drives are the primary street
typology for residential neighborhoods,
connecting various dwelling units
with other portions of the community
through features such as front doors,
pedestrian walkways, and landscaping.
A system of pedestrian walkways shall
also connect all residential dwellings to
the public sidewalk, parking facilties,
common open areas, waste and recycling
enclosures, and mailboxes, as described
in Section 2.6.
Residential lanes provide vehicular
and pedestrian access to multiple
residences in the form of a shared
street. This street type features
distinct entry paving and landscaping
to demarcate the lane’s dual functions.
33 CHAPTER 2
SITE PLANNING
11 1. Neighborhood Entries. All neighborhood entries
shall adhere to the following standards:
a. Garages for individual units are not permitted
to be accessed from neighborhood entries.
b. A pedestrian walkway at least 4 feet
wide is required on at least one side of a
neighborhood entry.
c. A 5-foot wide landscaped area is required
along the full length of a neighborhood entry.
This landscaped area may be adjacent to the
required pedestrian walkway.
Neighborhood entries serve as the primary access point(s) to a residential neighborhood, and may feature gates,
special landscape treatments, and monumentation. Guest
and/or new resident parking is also permitted within a
Neighborhood Entry.
Neighborhood Entries
34 CHAPTER 2
SITE PLANNING
12 2. Residential Drives. All residential drives shall adhere to the following standards:
a. A pedestrian walkway at least 4 feet wide is
required on at least one side of a residential drive.
b. In addition to the pedestrian walkway, a 5-foot
wide landscaped area is required on both sides of
a Rresidential drive. Street trees shall be installed
within this landscaped area.
c. Only residential units that feature both their
primary unit entries and garages on same
elevation/façade may provide direct vehicular
access onto a residential drive.
Residential drives are the primary street typology for
residential neighborhoods, connecting various dwelling units with other portions of the community through features such as front doors, pedestrian walkways, and landscaping. Parallel parking is permitted on residential drives.
Residential Drives
35 CHAPTER 2
SITE PLANNING
13 3. Residential Alleys. All residential alleys
shall adhere to the following standards:
a. Pedestrian walkways are not required
along residential alleys.
b. Primary dwelling entries (aka front
doors) are prohibited along residential
alleys, but may be provided along
another elevation, such as an adjacent
residential drive.
c. The garage of a unit adjacent to a
residential alley shall be accessed from
the residential alley.
Residential Alleys
Residential alleys provide dedicated vehicle access
to the garages of individual residential units. They
are the least pedestrian-oriented street type.
36 CHAPTER 2
SITE PLANNING
14 4. Residential Lanes. All residential lanes shall adhere to the following standards:
a. Residential lanes shall be at least 30 feet wide, as measured from garage-to-garage.
b. Patterned/colored pavers, brick, colored concrete,
or stamped concrete that differ from adjacent paving
shall be provided at the first 10 feet of each entrance to the residential lane.
c. At least 5% of the area of a residential lanes shall be landscaped.
d. At least 2 trees shall be planted at each entry to a residential lane.
e. A maximum of 32 dwelling units may feature
vehicular access from a single residential lane.
Residential lanes provide both vehicular and pedestrian access to multiple residences in the form of a shared street. This street type features distinct entry paving and landscaping to demarcate the lane’s dual use as a pedestrian and vehicular space.
Residential Lanes
37 CHAPTER 2
SITE PLANNING
15 Lane Courts
5. Lane Courts. All lane courts shall adhere to the
following standards:
a. Lane courts shall be at least 30 feet wide, as
measured garage-to-garage.
b. The entire length of a lane court colored/
patterned with pavers, concrete, stamped
asphalt, or brick.
c. At least 5% of the area of a lane court shall be
landscaped.
d. At least 2 trees shall be planted at the vehicular
entry to a lane court.
e. A maximum of 10 dwelling units may feature
vehicular access from a single lane court.
Lane courts provide both vehicular and pedestrian access to multiple residences, and feature a single vehicular access point. Front doors open onto the lane court, which features distinct paving to demarcate the court’s dual use as a
pedestrian and vehicular space.
38 CHAPTER 2
SITE PLANNING
16 2.3 Off Street Parking Bays
Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with the ratios set out in AVMC 15.38.030.
2.4 Screening of Equipment and Facilities
Screening of equipment and facilities shall conform to the provisions of AVMC 15.62.080.
2.5 Outdoor Lighting
Outdoor lighting shall conform to the provisions of AVMC 15.62.070.
2.6 Pedestrian Circulation
In addition to the street types described in Section B, Streets, a system of pedestrian walkways shall connect all residential dwelling units to the public sidewalk, parking facilities, common open areas, waste and recycling enclosures, mailboxes, and other such features provided in the development. This system shall adhere to the following standards:
1. Connectivity. Pedestrian walkways shall not terminate at streets, but shall either:
a. Merge with a sidewalk running parallel with the street. b. Traverse the street via crosswalks demarcated with paint or decorative paving, provided that this crosswalk connects to:
i. A sidewalk on the other side of the street
ii. Another pedestrian walkway
iii. Common open area
iv. Recreational amenities
2. Paving. Pedestrian walkways shall be paved.
3. Width. Pedestrian walkways shall be at least 4 feet wide. 39 CHAPTER 2
SITE PLANNING
17 2.7 Bikeways and Equestrian Trails
Bikeways and equestrian/hiking trails shall be provided in conjunction with each residential development in accordance with the City’s General Plan, Development Code, and other applicable plans and ordinances.
2.8 Parks and Open Space
1. Landscaping. Landscape treatments shall be in accordance with the landscape standards of AVMC
15.62.060.
2. Common open area. In addition to public parkland contributions, residential projects shall provide usable common open area pursuant to AVMC 15.10.030. a. Location. All residential units shall be within 300 feet of a common open area. b. Setbacks. Common open areas shall be separated from arterial streets, service areas, and nonresidential uses by at least 10 feet. This 10-foot separation shall not be utilized in calculating open space.
2.9 Trash Enclosures
Residential trash enclosures shall conform to the same provisions as nonresidential enclosures set forth in AVMC 15.62.080 and shall accommodate the storage of trash, recycling, and organic waste containers.
Residential trash storage for single-family and duplexes shall not encroach into the unobstructed vehicular space required in Section AVMC 15.38.030. If stored in a garage, space for trash, recycling, and organic waste containers shall be at least 3 feet deep. This space may be located beside or behind the required unobstructed vehicular space.
40 Chapter 3
3.1 Color and Style
3.2 Architectural Styles
3.3 Building Elevations
3.4 Roofs
3.5 Materials
3.6 Doors, Windows, and Trim
3.7 Garages and Carports
3.8 Accessory Elements
ARCHITECTURE
41 CHAPTER 3
ARCHITECTURE
19 3.1 Color and Style
Residential developments shall provide multiple colors schemes as they increase in scale.
If multiple color schemes are provided, a single color scheme shall be dedicated to no less than 30 percent of all residential buildings.
1. Residential developments with 25 to 50 single-family/duplex units, or 6 to 10 multifamily buildings shall provide a minimum of two distinct color schemes.
2. Residential developments with 51 to 100 single-family/duplex units, or 11 to 20 multifamily buildings shall provide at least two of the architectural styles in this section, each with at least one distinct color scheme.
3. Residential developments with 101 or more single-family/duplex units, or 21 or more multifamily buildings shall provide at least three of the architectural styles in this section, each with at least one distinct color scheme.
If multiple housing typologies (e.g. single-family units and townhomes) are proposed within a single development, the required number of styles for each typology may differ depending on the overall number of units or buildings provided in each typology.
3.2 Architectural Styles
All new residential developments shall adhere to one of the architectural styles contained in this section. All proposed design elements that define the chosen architectural style shall also meet the other standards contained in this document.
Architectural design elements and materials shall be consistent throughout the project, recognizing that a building is three dimensional and must feature architectural detailing on all sides. To provide guidance on architectural styles, the standards offer a menu of architectural traditions:
• Spanish Revival
• Tuscan
• Modern Ranch
• Modern
Each style contains a list of required architectural characteristics pertaining to roofs, walls, doors, and windows. In addition, all styles contain a menu of options that shall be included to provide architectural detailing to the building.
Styles may not be mixed within a single building.
42 CHAPTER 3
ARCHITECTURE
20 A. Spanish Revival
Spanish Revival style, also known as Spanish Colonial,
Mission, or Monterey, is characterized by picturesque
combinations of simple rectilinear forms of varying
heights. The buildings are capped with gabled or
hipped roofs of red clay barrel tiles with little or no eave overhang. Courtyards and well-detailed structural
elements, such as pergolas, trellises or loggias and
arcades often provide another layer to the massing.
Elements such as balconies, towers, chimneys and
other tile, wood, or wrought iron details add accents.
Asymmetrical facades are common with arches over
windows and doorways.
43 CHAPTER 3
ARCHITECTURE
21 All Spanish Revival style residential buildings shall adhere to the following standards:
1. Low pitched (4:12 maximum) gable roofs. The pitch shall remain constant. Roofs shall be clay tile or concrete/cement tile roofs.
Common tile shapes include both Spanish (S-shaped) and Mission (half-cylinder) types. Additional forms are permitted as follows:
a. Hipped roofs may be used in combination with gables or on a tower element, b. Shed roofs may used in conjunction with verandas and minor “lean-to” structures, c. Flat roofs with parapets shall not exceed 40% of the total roof area;
2. At least 25% of the eaves shall have a minimum overhang of 9 inches with exposed rafter tails;
3. Primary facades shall be off-white, cream, or tan stucco with a smooth or lightly textured finish (i.e. minimum 16/20 finish, hand troweled or smaller particles). Window and doors shall be in a dark, contrasting color (such as black, navy blue, or forest green);
4. At least two types/shapes of windows shall be used. At least 50% of the windows shall have a vertical proportion. Windows over 5 feet in width shall be multi-paned;
5. All entrance doors shall be recessed at least 6 inches and banded with ceramic tile, molded plaster or painted accents; and
6. Wood or manufactured wood products shall be for at least one architectural element (such as posts and exposed beams; spindles and grill work; window frames, shutters, etc.).
3 2
4 5
6 1
44 CHAPTER 3
ARCHITECTURE
22 In addition, duplexes and detached single-family Spanish Revival buildings shall include at least two of the following features; buildings with 10 units or less shall feature at least three of the following features, and buildings with 11 or more units shall include at least four of the following features:
1. Use a minimum 3-inch wide by 1.5-inch thick flat casing on all non-recessed windows;
2. Provide verandas for at least 50 percent the total units in the building, each with a minimum depth of 6 feet and a minimum width of 10 feet;
3. Install awnings with metal spear supports at least 1 inch in diameter and spaced no more than 4 feet apart for at least 20% the total window count;
4. Provide shutters for at least 20% of the total window count;
5. Construct chimneys extending at least 2 feet above the roof ridge, featuring either a decorative cap, tile surrounding, or overhanging roof element;
6. Include a minimum of two decorative masonry, clay tile, or simulated vents per elevation, each at least 144 square inches in size;
7. Apply decorative tile accents covering at least 5% of the surface area around door and window openings, built-in seating, paving, or stairs;
8. Feature exposed, dark-stained timber structural elements such as beams, columns, and corbels with a minimum width of 4 inches.
45 CHAPTER 3
ARCHITECTURE
23 9. Integrate one or more arched elements measuring at least 5 feet wide and 8 feet tall;
10. Utilize paired wood (or wood simulated) garage doors with at least two pieces of 18-inch iron or simulated iron strap hardware per door leaf;
11. Use shutters that match the door or trim accent color and are sized to cover 100% of the window opening width;
12. Design stepped-down ends that are at least 5 feet wide and 10 feet lower than the primary building mass;
13. Maintain three or more roof planes and/or ridge lines with a minimum slope of 3:12;
14. Build upper floor cantilevered balconies that project a minimum of 3 feet from the building face;
15. Define courtyards and walkways using verandas or pergolas with a minimum clear depth of 8 feet that cover at least 25% of the courtyard perimeter;
16. Utilize arcades with a minimum walkway width of 6 feet and arch spans of at least 4 feet to define primary circulation paths or courtyard edges;
17. Construct wingwalls with a minimum thickness of 1 foot or ground-level columns with a minimum diameter of 10 inches; and/or
18. Employ wrought iron for at least one architectural element, such as balcony railings at least 3 feet high, hardware, light fixtures, or gates.
46 CHAPTER 3
ARCHITECTURE
24 B. Tuscan
Tuscan style is an interpretation of traditional Mediterranean architectural style joined by rural Italian elements. Key elements include the use of stone and stucco, light earth tones, and red tile roofs. Classical elements such as columns and arches and decorative iron work add visual complexity.
Squared towers and projections speak to Italianate
references. Porches and porticoes are common, as are
vertically oriented, recessed windows.
47 CHAPTER 3
ARCHITECTURE
25 All Tuscan style residential buildings shall adhere to the following standards:
1. Low-pitched hip or gable roof (maximum 6:12 slope) and at least 3 roof levels;
2. Roof material shall be composed of tiles;
3. Large overhanging eaves (minimum 12 inches) along primary elevation;
4. Flat stucco walls in earth tones shall be utilized, with earth toned being defined as a color with a lightness (light reflective) value of 25 to 60 that is composed of a mixture of any shade of brown and any shade of any other color or colors;
5. At least 50% of windows shall be recessed 3 to 9 inches from outer wall on primary façade and shall feature brown or beige trim; and
6. At least one casement window per unit shall be provided on single-family/duplex buildings, and shall be paired with four-pane patterns for narrow windows and eight-pane patterns for wider windows. 3 2
4 5
1 6
48 CHAPTER 3
ARCHITECTURE
26 In addition, duplexes and detached single-family Tuscan buildings shall include at least two of the following features; buildings with 10 units or less shall feature at least three of the following features, and buildings with 11 or more units shall include at least four of the following features:
1. Arched wall niches with a minimum depth of 8 inches and a height-to-width ratio of at least 1.5:1 to ensure a vertical proportion;
2. Carved medallions with a minimum diameter of 12 inches and a depth of projection between 1.5 and 3 inches from the wall surface;
3. Ceramic inset tiles of 4x4 or 6x6 inches and recessed so the tile face sits flush with the surrounding stucco or stone finish;
4. Corner quoins: each block must have a minimum vertical height of 12 inches, with lengths alternating between 18 and 24 inches, and forming an interlocking pattern;
5. Decorative clavos, spaced no more than 6 to 8 inches apart on center along the perimeter or panels of wooden doors and shutters;
6. Decorative corbels with a minimum vertical height of 10 inches and a projection (run) that supports at least 60% of the overhanging element’s depth;
7. Decorative plaster friezes between 8 and 18 inches in height, located within the top 10% of the wall’s total vertical height;
8. Timber lintels with a minimum cross-section of 6x8 inches and extend at least 4 inches beyond the width of the window opening on both sides;
49 CHAPTER 3
ARCHITECTURE
27 9. Juliet balconies, not more than 1 foot deep;
10. Sconces with a minimum height of 18 inches (excluding the mounting arm).
11. Scrolled window grilles projecting at least 4 to 6 inches from the window pane at their furthest point;
12. Stone window sills at least 3 inches thick and projecting a minimum of 2.5 inches beyond the finished wall surface to create a distinct shadow line;
13. Terracotta chimney pots standing between 18 and 36 inches tall, with a minimum wall thickness of 0.75 inches;
14. Tiered water features with a least two levels of basins, with the primary basin having a minimum diameter of 36 inches;
15. Trellis rafter tails extending at least 12 inches beyond the outermost supporting beam; or
16. Wrought iron finials extending a minimum of 8 to 12 inches above the ridge line or railing cap, with a base diameter of at least 2 inches.
50 CHAPTER 3
ARCHITECTURE
28 C. Modern Ranch
Modern Ranch style is the synthesis of the
California Ranch and the Modern Farmhouse
styles. It merges the horizontal emphasis of
the 19th-century Western vernacular with
the clean lines and verticality of current
residential form. This style prioritizes
seamless indoor-outdoor connections,
utilizing a sophisticated palette and a
mixture of rustic and industrial materials.
Modern Ranch shall not be applied to
buildings over 3 stories in height, or to any
Large-Scale Residential project.
51 CHAPTER 3
ARCHITECTURE
29 All modern ranch buildings shall adhere to the following standards:
1. Roofs shall be a combination of low-pitched hipped or gable-on-hip forms (3:12 to 5:12 slope) and prominent gabled or shed roof accents (minimum 6:12 slope).
2. Primary roof surfaces shall consist of dark architectural-grade asphalt shingles or synthetic slate. Accent roof planes, such as those over porches or bay windows, must utilize standing-seam metal or copper.
3. Eaves shall be a minimum of 2 feet along the primary elevation. Rafters may be boxed or open with exposed timber tails, emphasizing the horizontal plane.
4. Facades must utilize at least two materials: horizontal clapboard or smooth stucco (sand/dash finish) for the primary body, and board-and-batten siding or corrugated metal covering at least 15% of the exterior surface.
5. Windows shall feature slim-profile frames (steel, aluminum, or wood). At least 50% of the windows must feature a vertical proportion of at least 1.5:1.
6. Facade colors shall be restricted to pastels, grays, or earth tones, being defined as a color with a lightness (light reflective) value of 25 to 60 that is composed of a mixture of any shade of brown and any shade of any other color or colors. Contrasting dark accents (black or charcoal) or white accents are required for window sashes, doors, and architectural metalwork. 3 1
4 5 6
2 2
5 52
CHAPTER 3
ARCHITECTURE
30 In addition, single-family and duplex modern ranch buildings shall include two of the following features; buildings with up to 10 residential units shall include at least three of the following features; and buildings with 11 or more residential units shall feature at least four of the following features:
1. 3 to 6-inch unadorned board trim around all window and door openings;
2. A wide front porch recessed under the primary roofline, supported by square columns or wrought iron supports;
3. A wide brick or natural stone chimney located on the primary or street-facing façade;
4. Integration of clerestory windows within the upper triangular portion of gable ends;
5. Cantilevered eaves or patio covers extending at least 5 feet from the facade, supported by industrial metal or heavy timber columns;
6. Wall-mounted gooseneck light fixtures used as the primary exterior illumination for entries and garage doors;
7. Garage doors or large entries featuring carriage-style detailing or “Dutch door” split configurations.
8. At least three distinct wall planes across the primary elevation; 53 CHAPTER 3
ARCHITECTURE
31 9. Metal-clad awnings without side supports installed over ground-level windows;
10. The inclusion of at least one hexagonal, octagonal, or circular “moon” window or gate at the primary entrance;
11. Architectural massing inspired by rural granaries or tank houses (e.g., a vertical tower element for a stairwell);
12. Built-in wood or metal window boxes or balconettes on at least 20% of the street-facing windows;
13. Use of shed or gabled dormers to break up large roof planes;
14. Dark-color wood trellises or heavy timber lintels (minimum 6x8 inches) positioned above ground-floor openings;
15. Application of plank-style, louvered, or framed wood shutters on at least 20% of windows on a publicly visible elevation, finished in a darker accent color;
16. Use of unadorned corrugated metal panels for focal wall sections or as “eyebrow” awnings over secondary entries; or
17. Inclusion of at least one projecting bay window on the front facade, which may utilize a standing-seam metal or copper roof regardless of the primary roof material. 54 CHAPTER 3
ARCHITECTURE
32 D. Modern
Modern architecture is the post-World War II iteration of the International Style, which was characterized by geometric forms, smooth wall surfaces, and an absence of exterior decoration.
Modern architecture represents the adaptation of these elements to the local climate and topography, as well as the postwar need for efficiently-built homes. In Southern California, this often meant the use of wood post-and-beam construction. Modernism is often characterized by a clear expression of structure and materials, large expanses of glass, and open interior plans.
55 CHAPTER 3
ARCHITECTURE
33 All modern buildings shall adhere to the following standards:
1. Flat, low pitched, folded plate, or butterfly roofs shall be utilized (4:12 slope max). Tile roofs are prohibited. a. Flat-roofed buildings shall incorporate a decorative molding (minimum 6-inch height for single-story, 12-inch for multi-story) that projects from the wall plane.
b. Minimum 12-inch overhangs are required for at least 50 percent of the roofline.
2. The primary wall materials shall be either glass, concrete block veneer, natural stone, metal panels or wood. At least 20 percent of the street-facing façade shall be composed of glass/windows.
3. Primary facade colors shall be restricted to off-whites, greys, metallic shades, or earth-tones. Brighter colors with a light reflectance value (LRV) greater than 70 may only be used on recesses and detailing shall be reserved for recesses and architectural detailing. Contrasting accent colors (black or charcoal) are required for window sashes, doors, and architectural metalwork.
4. Primary entrances must be recessed by a minimum of 12 inches to create shadow lines.
5. Windows shall feature metal (steel/aluminum) frames. Frames shall not be white.
6. Windows shall be square or rectangular.
1 2
3 4
5 6
56 CHAPTER 3
ARCHITECTURE
34 In addition, single-family and duplex modern buildings shall include two of the following features; buildings with up to 10 residential units shall include at least three of the following features; and buildings with 11 or more residential units shall feature at least four of the following features:
1. Aluminum louvers consisting of fixed or operable horizontal slats with an anodized or powder-coated finish;
2. Board and batten siding consisting of vertical boards 8 to 12 inches wide, with 1 to 2-inch wide battens;
3. Breeze block consisting of hollow-core masonry units with geometric apertures, stacked in a continuous plane;
4. Cantilevered upper stories projecting at least 3 feet beyond the ground-floor wall plane, supported without visible vertical columns;
5. Clerestory windows consisting of a horizontal band of glazing positioned located immediately beneath the roofline;
6. Colonnades consisting of at least three columns spaced at regular intervals of 6 to 10 feet, forming a continuous covered exterior walkway;
7. Corner windows consisting of glazing units joined at a 90-degree angle using mitered glass or a minimal-profile mullion less than 3 inches wide;
8. Decorative water feature consisting of a geometric pool or fountain with a minimum surface area of 100 square feet;
57 CHAPTER 3
ARCHITECTURE
35 9. Exposed post-and-beam construction consisting of a visible structural framework of wood or steel members, articulated as the primary load-bearing system;
10. Floor-to-ceiling glass walls consisting of glazing units extending from the finished floor to the ceiling, utilizing slender frames;
11. Horizontal beveled windows consisting of bands of windows featuring beveled glass or frames, oriented horizontally;
12. Horizontal trellis consisting of a wood or metal framework of horizontal members, providing shade over at least 50 square feet of exterior space;
13. Metal shadowbox frames consisting of recessed window assemblies within a metal frame that projects at least 4 inches from the exterior wall surface;
14. Metal sunshades consisting of fixed horizontal or vertical metal fins mounted over glazing, with a projection depth-to-height ratio of at least 1:2;
15. Natural stone cladding consisting of travertine, marble, or granite applied in large-format slabs or ashlar patterns with a matte or honed finish;
16. Pivot-style front door, utilizing a concealed vertical pivot hinge system instead of side- mounted hinges;
17. Raised podium foundation consisting of a visible slab or masonry plinth that elevates the primary floor plate at least 3 feet above the finished grade;
18. Vertical metal slat awnings consisting of vertical metal slats spaced no more than 4 inches apart, projecting at least 1 foot from the facade.
58 CHAPTER 3
ARCHITECTURE
36 3.3 Building Elevations
Massing
Primary elevations shall incorporate design features such as offsets, balconies, projections, window reveals, or similar elements to preclude large expanses of uninterrupted building. Along the vertical face of a structure, such features shall occur at a minimum of every 35 feet along neighborhood entries and residential drives:
1. Recesses (e.g. patio, forecourt, garage, balcony, etc.) with a minimum depth of 4 feet and a width of 10 feet.
2. Projections (e.g. floor area, bay window, covered entry, etc.) with a minimum depth of 2 feet and a width of 4 feet.
3. Offsets in the facade of 2 feet or greater.
Entrances
Residential entrances shall take the form of recesses, porches, stoops, overhangs, or forecourts for each primary dwelling unit.
1. Recesses. A recess is a portion of a building that is set back from other portions of the elevation. If used to demarcate an entrance, recesses shall adhere to the following standards:
a. Units. A single entry recess may serve up to two residential units. b. Width/Length. An entry recess shall be at least 5 feet wide, or 8 feet wide if used by two units.
c. Depth. An entry recess shall be at least 3 feet deep. d. Height. The recess shall extend from grade to roof.
e. Finish Level Above Sidewalk. An entryway solely utilizing the recess frontage may be flush with the sidewalk.
59 CHAPTER 3
ARCHITECTURE
37 2. Porches. A porch is a roofed, unenclosed room attached to the exterior of a building that provides a physical transition between the sidewalk and the building. If provided, porches shall adhere to the following standards:
a. Units. A single porch may serve no more than two residential units b. Width/Length. If provided, porches shall be at least 10 feet wide if serving one unit, or 12 feet wide if serving two units.
c. Depth. Porches shall be at least 6 feet deep.
d. Height. The clearance between the floor of the porch and the underside of the roof eave shall be at least 8 feet.
3. Stoops. A stoop is a stair and landing leading directly from the sidewalk to a building entrance. The ground floor of the building is typically raised to provide increased privacy for the rooms facing the public street. If provided, stoops shall adhere to the following standards:
a. Units. An individual stoop may serve up to two residential units. b. Width/Length. If provided, stoops shall be at least 3 feet wide. c. Depth. Stoops shall be at least 3 feet deep. All stoop entries shall be recessed into the building façade by 1 foot.
d. Height. An overhang above a stoop shall feature an 8 foot height clearance. 60 CHAPTER 3
ARCHITECTURE
38 4. Overhangs. An overhang is a frontage wherein the building façade features a projection that covers the entrance of a dwelling unit. If provided, overhangs shall adhere to the following standards:
a. Width/Length. If provided, overhangs shall be at least 5 feet wide. b. Depth. Overhangs shall be at least 2 feet deep. If used in conjunction with a stoop, the overhang shall be at least as deep as the stoop.
c. Height. The clearance between the floor of the entryway and the underside of the overhang shall be at least 8 feet.
5. Forecourts. A forecourt is formed when a building is designed around an open space defined by the surrounding building walls. Forecourts may provide additional open space for units, and offer additional spaces for landscaping. If provided, forecourts shall adhere to the following standards:
a. Width/Length. If provided, forecourts shall be at least 10 feet wide if serving one unit, 12 feet wide if serving two or three units, or 15 feet wide if serving four units. b. Depth. Forecourts shall be at least as deep as they are wide. c. Stairs. Stairs within a forecourt access units on an upper story. 61 CHAPTER 3
ARCHITECTURE
39 3.4 Roofs
1. Roofline Modulation. Residential buildings two or more stories shall incorporate at least one of the following:
a. Roofline Variation. Variation in roof height and/or ridgeline as follows:
i. One story: Not required
ii. Two stories: 2 feet for every 30 linear feet
iii. Three stories: 2 feet for every 50 linear feet
iv. Four+ stories: 3 feet for every 75 linear feet
b. Pitched Roof Variation. Use of dormers, cross-gable and/or hipped roof lines.
2. Flat Roofs. Flat roofs shall not cover more than 50 percent of the building’s footprint, and shall feature a screening parapet topped with a coping, cornice at least 3 feet in height. a. Modern-style buildings may feature flat roofs that cover 100 percent of its footprint.
3. Roof-Mounted Equipment. Roof-mounted equipment (e.g., air conditioning, heating, ventilation, and associated vents and exhausts) on multifamily buildings shall be screened from a horizontal line of sight pursuant to AVMC 15.62.080.
4. Antennas. Wireless communications, television, dish, amateur radio, and other antennas shall comply with the provisions of Chapters 15.42 and 15.44 AVMC. 62 CHAPTER 3
ARCHITECTURE
40 3.5 Materials
1. Material List. Residential developments shall adhere to Table 3-1.
2. Four-Sided Architecture. All elevations shall contain the same primary materials and trim treatment.
3. Material Changes. Changes in material or color shall occur at inside corners of intersecting walls or at architectural features that break up the wall plane, such as columns.
LOCATION PERMITTED MATERIALS
ROOFS
Clay, slate, or concrete roof tiles
Composite shingles
Standing seam metal
BUILDING WALLS
Stucco
Fiber-Cement Siding
Brick
Stone
Metal
Ignition-Resistant Wood
Ceramic Tile
Glass (glazing less than 15%)
FREE STANDING WALLS
Wood
Stucco over CMU block
Wrought iron
Brick
Table 3-1. Material List
63 CHAPTER 3
ARCHITECTURE
41 3.6 Doors, Windows, and Trim
1. Trim. All windows and exterior doors shall either be recessed from the plane of the surrounding exterior wall or shall have a trim or windowsill. a. When trim is used, a minimum of 0.5 inch by 3 inch trim is required, which is of a different color to the primary color of the building.
b. On stucco walls, when no trim is used, a minimum of 1 inch deep, raised relief around the window is required.
c. On brick or stone walls, when no trim is used, a minimum 2 inch wide brickmold is required around windows.
2. Door Elements. Additional elements required for front doors include:
a. Doorbells shall be provided within 2 feet of the front door. b. Entry doors for individual units shall include a viewport.
3. Window Elements. Additional requirements for windows include:
a. Glass shall be clear without reflective coating or dark tinting. Lightly tinted glazing less than 15% is acceptable.
b. Openable windows shall include screens.
64 CHAPTER 3
ARCHITECTURE
42 3.7 Garages and Carports
1. Recess. Garage doors shall be set back at least 6 to 18 inches from the rest of the façade.
2. Treatments. Garage fixtures and wall treatments shall utilize materials and colors otherwise permitted for the selected architectural style category. Garages shall feature at least two of the following design elements:
a. Driveway, residential lane, or lane court composed of patterned and/or colored pavers, brick, decorative colored concrete, stamped concrete, or permeable materials. b. Roof overhang at least 1 foot in depth.
c. Windows on the garage door.
d. Sectional rollup doors.
e. Trellis at least 2 feet in depth.
f. Side-loading.
g. Decorative light fixture, consistent with the chosen architectural style.
3. Carports. Carport structures shall utilize the same colors, architectural finishes, and roofing materials as the residential building(s) it serves. 65 CHAPTER 3
ARCHITECTURE
43 3.8 Accessory Elements
1. Patios. If provided as individual dwelling unit open space, private patios shall adhere to the following standards:
a. Patios shall have a minimum area of 60 square feet with a minimum dimension of 6 feet in each direction.
b. Patios shall be separated from common or public areas by a fence or wall.
2. Balconies. If provided as individual dwelling unit open space, balconies shall adhere to the following standards:
a. Balconies shall have a minimum area of 50 square feet with a minimum dimension of 5 feet in one direction. This dimension excludes areas for permanent equipment and storage. b. Balconies shall be recessed a minimum of 1 foot partially recessed into the building façade.
The maximum projection shall be 50 percent of the balcony’s full depth or 5 feet, whichever is less.
c. The underside of projecting balconies shall be finished with building material as the rest of the structure.
d. No balconies shall overhang into the public right-of-way or sidewalk, not including the portion of the building setback behind the existing lot line.
3. Roof Decks. If provided as individual dwelling unit open space, roof decks shall adhere to the following standards:
a. Roof decks shall have a minimum area of 50 square feet with a minimum dimension of 5 feet in one direction. This dimension excludes areas for permanent equipment and storage. b. The sides of the roof deck shall be finished with building material that matches the rest of the building.
c. Roof decks shall not overhang from the building façade.
4. Mailboxes.
a. Mailboxes shall be located within one block of the residential units. 66 Chapter 4
4.1 Threshold and Applicability
4.2 Site Planing
4.3 Architecture and Materials
4.4 Landscape and Open Space
4.5 Mixed Use
LARGE SCALE
RESIDENTIAL
67 45
CHAPTER 4
LARGE SCALE RESIDENTIAL
4.1 Threshold and Applicability
The supplemental standards in this section apply to residential developments with a density of 25 units per acre or more.
Typical typologies at this level of density include apartments, built either as a wrap around a parking structure or built atop a parking podium. These types of buildings are much larger than typical residential structures found in Aliso Viejo, which are generally single-family homes, townhomes, duplexes, and smaller-scale apartments up to three stories in height.
The design standards in this section for higher density residential projects are intended to supplement, and are in addition to, the overall design standards of the rest of this document. These standards have been calibrated to address design issues that arise with larger residential or mixed-use buildings.
68 46
CHAPTER 4
LARGE SCALE RESIDENTIAL
4.2 Site Planning
1. Scale. Larger structures shall utilize major modulations, and may utilize elevated pedestrian walkways to connect different wings of a building that are formed by major modulations to provide ADA-compliant pedestrian access between all residential units and shared amenities of a development. For the purposes of this section, large buildings are defined as structures containing 60 or more residential units.
2. Corner Elements. Large multifamily buildings and mixed-use buildings sited on a corner shall provide at least two of the following features:
a. Tower or dome element at least 5 feet in height
b. Recess or projection, at least 5 feet in depth, 20 feet in width, and at least as tall as wide
c. Diagonal/curved walls at corner, at least 25 feet in length d. Entrance at corner
e. Color and material variation from the primary façade with an area of at least 25 feet by 25 feet.
f. Plaza or gathering area, with at least 1,000 square feet of paving.
3. Elevated Pedestrian Walkways. If provided, an elevated pedestrian walkway (or skybridge) connects two different buildings or different wings of the same building, and shall adhere to the followings standards:
a. Width. The walkway shall have a minimum width of 5 feet and a maximum width of 8 feet.
b. Height. The minimum height clearance from the ground to an elevated pedestrian walkway shall be 12 feet. The interior vertical clearance for each level of a pedestrian walkway shall be 8 feet.
69 47
CHAPTER 4
LARGE SCALE RESIDENTIAL
4.3 Architecture and Materials
1. Major Modulations. A major modulation in facade depth, extending from grade to roof, shall be provided along facades greater than 150 feet in length. For such facades, a major modulation shall be provided for each 150 feet of building frontage. Major modulations shall be at least 10 feet deep and 25 feet in length.
2. Minor Modulations. A 5-foot change in facade depth no shorter than 15 feet in length and 10 feet in height shall be provided for every 50 feet of building frontage. Required minor modulations may be situated adjacent to, but not within, a major modulation, and shall feature a different depth than the major modulation.
3. Stepbacks. As required in Table 15.18.030 of the AVMC, all minimum perimeter setbacks shall be increased one foot for every foot in height above 35 feet (except for setbacks from interior property lines).
4. Roofline Modulation. Large buildings shall also utilize at least one of the following techniques to modulate their rooflines, in addition to the standard roofline modulation listed in Section 3.4.
a. Reduced Floor Area. The uppermost floor features a footprint up to 75 percent the size of the floor below.
b. Unit Type. Use of loft-style units on the uppermost floor with ceilings at least 5 feet taller than the floor below.
c. Unit Count. Provide up to 75 percent the number of units on the uppermost floor as compared to the floor below.
5. Blank Façades. A blank façade is a portion of a façade without a window, balcony, and/ or doorways more than 30 feet in any direction. Features such as trellises, screens, modulations, material changes, and landscaping shall cover at least 50 percent of all blank façades.
70 48
CHAPTER 4
LARGE SCALE RESIDENTIAL
4.4 Landscape and Open Space
Landscaping shall be provided in accordance with the provisions of AVMC 15.62.060.
4.5 Mixed Use
1. Distribution of Uses.
a. A minimum of 50 percent of a mixed-use building’s commercial or office components shall be located on the ground floor. b. Common residential open space shall not be publicly-accessible.
2. Entrances.
a. Entrances to upper floor uses shall be provided through a common entrance fronting a street. b. There shall be a ground-floor entrance to either a commercial, residential, open space, or parking use every 50 feet along the building’s street-facing frontages.
3. Building Design.
a. Service entries, loading areas, and trash areas associated with commercial uses shall not be immediately adjacent to residential uses.
b. The windows, doors, and other access points of commercial uses shall be oriented to not face residential uses within 50 feet.
4. Horizontal Mixed Use.
a. Commercial buildings shall face public streets and be sited either adjacent to or in front of the residential component of a horizontal mixed-use development.
b. Residential uses shall be located at the rear or sides of the site. c. Parking for commercial uses shall be located at the center of the site, allowing the parking to provide a buffer from on-site residential uses and maximize shared parking opportunities between residential and commercial uses. d. If provided, dedicated private residential parking areas shall be separated from public commercial parking with a dedicated entrance.
e. The commercial, residential, and open space areas of a horizontal mixed use project shall be connected via internal pathways. 71 Aliso Viejo
OBJECTIVE DESIGN
STANDARD CHECKLIST
72 General Standards
Design Standards Applicant City Use Only
Complete N/A Complete N/A
2.1 Access and Circulation
Connections to Existing Network. Where an existing public or private street terminates at the project boundary, the project shall align any connecting internal street or pedestrian pathway within 15 degrees of the existing alignment unless prevented by topography, easements, or existing utilities Project Identification. Identification signs shall be provided for all residential projects. Such signs shall conform to the limitations on size, height, and placement set out in Chapter 15.34 AVMC.
Entry Location. Project entries shall not be located closer than 100 feet from an intersection/curb return. If the parcel frontage is less than 100 feet from curb return the curb cut shall be located as far from the curb return as possible. A curb return is the point where the radius of a curve or intersection ends.
Entry Design. Entry landscape treatment shall be in accordance with the landscape standards of AVMC
15.62.060.
Gated Entries. Gate-guarded entries shall be regulated in accordance with city regulations governing gate- guarded neighborhoods as set out in AVMC 15.14.200.
Transit. Projects with a bus or transit stop along its frontage shall incorporate turnouts according to the standards of the applicable transit agency or school district.
Residential complex developments 81 or more single-family/duplex units, or 21 or more multifamily buildings shall shall provide three architectural styles from Chapter 4, each with at least three distinct color schemes.
2.2 Streets
Public streets contained in a residential development shall adhere to AVMC 14.10.060.
Private streets shall adhere to AVMC 14.10.040 and the design standards contained in this document.
Neighborhood Entries. All neighborhood entries shall adhere to the following standards:
Garages for individual units are not permitted to be accessed from neighborhood entries.
A pedestrian walkway at least 4 feet wide is required on at least one side of a neighborhood entry.
A 5-foot wide landscaped area is required along the full length of a neighborhood entry. This landscaped area may be adjacent to the required pedestrian walkway.
Residential Drives. All residential drives shall adhere to the following standards:
A pedestrian walkway at least 4 feet wide is required on at least one side of a residential drive.
In addition to the pedestrian walkway, a 5-foot wide landscaped area is required on both sides of a Rresidential drive. Street trees shall be installed within this landscaped area.
Only residential units that feature both their primary unit entries and garages on same elevation/façade may provide direct vehicular access onto a residential drive. 73 General Standards
Design Standards Applicant City Use Only
Complete N/A Complete N/A
Residential Alleys. All residential alleys shall adhere to the following standards:
Pedestrian walkways are not required along residential alleys.
Primary dwelling entries (aka front doors) are prohibited along residential alleys, but may be provided along another elevation, such as an adjacent residential drive.
The garage of a unit adjacent to a residential alley shall be accessed from the residential alley.
Residential Lanes. All residential lanes shall adhere to the following standards:
Residential lanes shall be at least 30 feet wide, as measured from garage-to-garage.
Patterned/colored pavers, brick, colored concrete, or stamped concrete that differ from adjacent paving shall be provided at the first 10 feet of each entrance to the residential lane.
At least 5% of the area of a residential lanes shall be landscaped.
At least 2 trees shall be planted at each entry to a residential lane.
A maximum of 32 dwelling units may feature vehicular access from a single residential lane.
Lane Courts. All lane courts shall adhere to the following standards:
Lane courts shall be at least 30 feet wide, as measured garage-to-garage.
The entire length of a lane court colored/patterned with pavers, concrete, stamped asphalt, or brick.
At least 5% of the area of a lane court shall be landscaped.
At least 2 trees shall be planted at the vehicular entry to a lane court.
A maximum of 10 dwelling units may feature vehicular access from a single lane court.
2.3 Off-Street Parking Bays - Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with the ratios set out in AVMC 15.38.030.
2.4 Screening of Equipment and Facilities - Screening of equipment and facilities shall conform to the provisions of AVMC 15.62.080.
2.5 Outdoor Lighting - Outdoor lighting shall conform to the provisions of AVMC 15.62.070. 74 General Standards
Design Standards Applicant City Use Only
Complete N/A Complete N/A
2.6 Pedestrian Circulation
In addition to the street types described in Section B, Streets, a system of pedestrian walkways shall connect all residential dwelling units to the public sidewalk, parking facilities, common open areas, waste and recycling enclosures, mailboxes, and other such features provided in the development.
Connectivity. Pedestrian walkways shall not terminate at streets, but shall either:
Merge with a sidewalk running parallel with the street or Traverse the street via crosswalks demarcated with paint or decorative paving Paving. Pedestrian walkways shall be paved.
Width. Pedestrian walkways shall be at least 4 feet wide.
2.7 Bikeways and Equestrian Trails - Bikeways and equestrian/hiking trails shall be provided in conjunction with each residential development in accordance with the City’s General Plan, Development Code, and other applicable plans and ordinances.
2.8 Parks and Open Space
Landscaping. Landscape treatments shall be in accordance with the landscape standards of AVMC
15.62.060.
Common open area. In addition to public parkland contributions, residential projects shall provide usable common open area pursuant to AVMC 15.10.030.
Location. All residential units shall be within 300 feet of a common open area.
Setbacks. Common open areas shall be separated from arterial streets, service areas, and nonresidential uses by at least 10 feet. This 10-foot separation shall not be utilized in calculating open space.
2.9 Trash Enclosures - Residential trash enclosures shall conform to the same provisions as nonresidential enclosures set forth in AVMC 15.62.080 and shall accommodate the storage of trash, recycling, and organic waste containers. Residential trash storage for single-family and duplexes shall not encroach into the unobstructed vehicular space required in Section AVMC 15.38.030.
If stored in a garage, space for trash, recycling, and organic waste containers shall be at least 3 feet deep.
This space may be located beside or behind the required unobstructed vehicular space. 75 General Standards
Design Standards Applicant City Use Only
Complete N/A Complete N/A
3.1 Color and Style
If multiple color schemes are provided, a single color scheme shall be dedicated to no less than 30 percent of all residential buildings.
Residential developments with 25 to 50 single-family/duplex units, or 6 to 10 multifamily buildings shall provide a minimum of two distinct color schemes.
Residential developments with 51 to 100 single-family/duplex units, or 11 to 20 multifamily buildings shall provide at least two of the architectural styles in this section, each with at least one distinct color scheme.
Residential developments with 101 or more single-family/duplex units, or 21 or more multifamily buildings shall provide at least three of the architectural styles in this section, each with at least one distinct color scheme.
3.2 Architectural Styles
All new residential developments shall adhere to one of the architectural styles contained in this section Styles may not be mixed within a single building.
Spanish Revival - All Spanish Revival style residential buildings shall adhere to the following standards:
Low pitched (4:12 maximum) gable roofs. The pitch shall remain constant. Roofs shall be clay tile or concrete/cement tile roofs. Common tile shapes include both Spanish (S-shaped) and Mission (half-cylinder) types.
Flat roofs with parapets shall not exceed 40% of the total roof area; At least 25% of the eaves shall have a minimum overhang of 9 inches with exposed rafter tails; Primary facades shall be off-white, cream, or tan stucco with a smooth or lightly textured finish (i.e. minimum 16/20 finish, hand troweled or smaller particles). Window and doors shall be in a dark, contrasting color (such as black, navy blue, or forest green);
At least two types/shapes of windows shall be used. At least 50% of the windows shall have a vertical proportion. Windows over 5 feet in width shall be multi-paned; All entrance doors shall be recessed at least 6 inches and banded with ceramic tile, molded plaster or painted accents; and
Wood or manufactured wood products shall be for at least one architectural element (such as posts and exposed beams; spindles and grill work; window frames, shutters, etc.). 76 General Standards
Design Standards Applicant City Use Only
Complete N/A Complete N/A
Spanish Revival - Duplexes and detached single-family Spanish Revival buildings shall include at least two of the following features; buildings with 10 units or less shall feature at least three of the following features, and buildings with 11 or more units shall include at least four of the following features:
Use a minimum 3-inch wide by 1.5-inch thick flat casing on all non-recessed windows; Provide verandas for at least 50 percent the total units in the building, each with a minimum depth of 6 feet and a minimum width of 10 feet;
Install awnings with metal spear supports at least 1 inch in diameter and spaced no more than 4 feet apart for at least 20% the total window count;
Provide shutters for at least 20% of the total window count; Construct chimneys extending at least 2 feet above the roof ridge, featuring either a decorative cap, tile surrounding, or overhanging roof element;
Include a minimum of two decorative masonry, clay tile, or simulated vents per elevation, each at least 144 square inches in size;
Apply decorative tile accents covering at least 5% of the surface area around door and window openings, built-in seating, paving, or stairs;
Feature exposed, dark-stained timber structural elements such as beams, columns, and corbels with a minimum width of 4 inches.
Integrate one or more arched elements measuring at least 5 feet wide and 8 feet tall; Utilize paired wood (or wood simulated) garage doors with at least two pieces of 18-inch iron or simulated iron strap hardware per door leaf;
Use shutters that match the door or trim accent color and cover 100% of the window opening width; Design stepped-down ends that are at least 5 feet wide and 10 feet lower than the primary building mass; Maintain three or more roof planes and/or ridge lines with a minimum slope of 3:12; Build upper floor cantilevered balconies that project a minimum of 3 feet from the building face; Define courtyards and walkways using verandas or pergolas with a minimum clear depth of 8 feet that cover at least 25% of the courtyard perimeter;
Utilize arcades with a minimum walkway width of 6 feet and arch spans of at least 4 feet to define primary circulation paths or courtyard edges;
Construct wingwalls with a minimum thickness of 1 foot or ground-level columns with a minimum diameter of 10 inches; and/or
Employ wrought iron for at least one architectural element, such as balcony railings at least 3 feet high, hardware, light fixtures, or gates.
77 General Standards
Design Standards Applicant City Use Only
Complete N/A Complete N/A
Modern Ranch - All modern ranch buildings shall adhere to the following standards:
Roofs shall be a combination of low-pitched hipped or gable-on-hip forms (3:12 to 5:12 slope) and prominent gabled or shed roof accents (minimum 6:12 slope).
Primary roof surfaces shall consist of dark architectural-grade asphalt shingles or synthetic slate. Accent roof planes, such as those over porches or bay windows, must utilize standing-seam metal or copper.
Eaves shall be a minimum of 2 feet along the primary elevation. Rafters may be boxed or open with exposed timber tails, emphasizing the horizontal plane.
Facades must utilize at least two materials: horizontal clapboard or smooth stucco (sand/dash finish) for the primary body, and board-and-batten siding or corrugated metal covering at least 15% of the exterior surface.
Windows shall feature slim-profile frames (steel, aluminum, or wood). At least 50% of the windows must feature a vertical proportion of at least 1.5:1.
Facade colors shall be restricted to pastels, grays, or earth tones. Contrasting dark accents (black or charcoal) or white accents are required for window sashes, doors, and architectural metalwork.
Modern Ranch - single-family and duplex modern ranch buildings shall include two of the following features; buildings with up to 10 residential units shall include at least three of the following features; and buildings with 11 or more residential units shall feature at least four of the following features:
3 to 6-inch unadorned board trim around all window and door openings; A wide front porch recessed under the primary roofline, supported by square columns or wrought iron supports; A wide brick or natural stone chimney located on the primary or street-facing façade; Integration of clerestory windows within the upper triangular portion of gable ends; Cantilevered eaves or patio covers extending at least 5 feet from the facade, supported by industrial metal or timber columns; Wall-mounted gooseneck light fixtures used as the primary exterior illumination for entries and garage doors; Garage doors or large entries featuring carriage-style detailing or “Dutch door” split configurations; At least three distinct wall planes across the primary elevation; Metal-clad awnings without side supports installed over ground-level windows; The inclusion of at least one hexagonal, octagonal, or circular “moon” window or gate at the primary entrance; Architectural massing inspired by rural granaries or tank houses (e.g., a vertical tower element for a stairwell); Built-in wood or metal window boxes or balconettes on at least 20% of the street-facing windows; Use of shed or gabled dormers to break up large roof planes; Dark-color wood trellises or heavy timber lintels (minimum 6x8 inches) positioned above ground-floor openings; Application of plank-style, louvered, or framed wood shutters on at least 20% of windows on a publicly visible elevation, finished in a darker accent color;
Use of unadorned corrugated metal panels for focal wall sections or as “eyebrow” awnings over secondary entries; or Inclusion of at least one projecting bay window on the front facade, which may utilize a standing-seam metal or copper roof regardless of the primary roof material. 78
General Standards
Design Standards Applicant City Use Only
Complete N/A Complete N/A
Modern - All modern buildings shall adhere to the following standards:
Flat, low pitched, folded plate, or butterfly roofs shall be utilized (4:12 slope max). Tile roofs are prohibited.
Flat-roofed buildings shall incorporate a decorative molding (minimum 6-inch height for single-story, 12-inch for multi-story) that projects from the wall plane.
Minimum 12-inch overhangs are required for at least 50 percent of the roofline.
The primary wall materials shall be either glass, concrete block veneer, natural stone, metal panels or wood. At least 20 percent of the street-facing façade shall be composed of glass/windows.
Primary facade colors shall be restricted to off-whites, greys, metallic shades, or earth-tones.
Primary entrances must be recessed by a minimum of 12 inches to create shadow lines.
Windows shall feature metal (steel/aluminum) frames. Frames shall not be white.
Windows shall be square or rectangular.
Modern - single-family and duplex modern buildings shall include two of the following features; buildings with up to 10 residential units shall include at least three of the following features; and buildings with 11 or more residential units shall feature at least four of the following features:
Aluminum louvers consisting of fixed or operable horizontal slats with an anodized or powder-coated finish; Board and batten siding consisting of vertical boards 8 to 12 inches wide, with 1 to 2-inch wide battens; Breeze block consisting of hollow-core masonry units with geometric apertures, stacked in a continuous plane; Cantilevered upper stories projecting at least 3 feet beyond the ground-floor wall plane, supported without visible vertical columns;
Clerestory windows consisting of a horizontal band of glazing positioned located immediately beneath the roofline; Colonnades consisting of at least three columns spaced at regular intervals of 6-10 feet; Corner windows consisting of glazing units joined at a 90-degree angle using mitered glass or mullion less than 3 inches wide; Decorative water feature consisting of a geometric pool or fountain with a minimum surface area of 100 square feet; Exposed post-and-beam construction consisting of a visible structural framework of wood or steel members, articulated as the primary load-bearing system;
Floor-to-ceiling glass walls consisting of glazing units extending from the finished floor to the ceiling, utilizing slender frames; Horizontal beveled windows consisting of bands of windows featuring beveled glass or frames, oriented horizontally; Horizontal trellis consisting of a wood or metal framework, providing shade over at least 50 square feet of exterior space; Metal shadowbox frames consisting of recessed window assemblies within a metal frame that projects at least 4 inches; Metal sunshades consisting of fixed metal fins mounted over glazing, with a projection depth-to-height ratio of at least 1:2; Pivot-style front door, utilizing a concealed vertical pivot hinge system instead of side-mounted hinges; Raised podium foundation that elevates the primary floor plate at least 3 feet above the finished grade; Vertical metal slat awnings consisting spaced no more than 4 inches apart, projecting at least 1 foot from the facade. 79 General Standards
Design Standards Applicant City Use Only
Complete N/A Complete N/A
3.3 Building Elevations
Primary elevations shall incorporate design features such as offsets, balconies, projections, window reveals, or similar elements to preclude large expanses of uninterrupted building. Along the vertical face of a structure, such features shall occur at a minimum of every 35 feet along neighborhood entries and residential drives Residential entrances shall take the form of recesses, porches, stoops, overhangs, or forecourts for each primary dwelling unit.
Recesses
Units. A single entry recess may serve up to two residential units.
Width/Length. An entry recess shall be at least 5 feet wide, or 8 feet wide if used by two units.
Depth. An entry recess shall be at least 3 feet deep.
Height. The recess shall extend from grade to roof.
Finish Level Above Sidewalk. An entryway solely utilizing the recess frontage may be flush with the sidewalk.
Porches
Units. A single porch may serve no more than two residential units Width/Length. Porches shall be at least 10 feet wide if serving one unit, or 12 feet wide if serving two units.
Depth. Porches shall be at least 6 feet deep.
Height. The clearance between the floor of the porch and the underside of the roof eave shall be at least 8 feet.
Stoops
Units. An individual stoop may serve up to two residential units.
Width/Length. If provided, stoops shall be at least 3 feet wide.
Depth. Stoops shall be at least 3 feet deep. All stoop entries shall be recessed into the building façade by 1 foot.
Height. An overhang above a stoop shall feature an 8 foot height clearance.
Overhangs
Width/Length. If provided, overhangs shall be at least 5 feet wide.
Depth. Overhangs shall be at least 2 feet deep. If used in conjunction with a stoop, the overhang shall be at least as deep as the stoop.
Height. The clearance between the floor of the entryway and the underside of the overhang shall be at least 8 feet.
Forecourts
Width/Length. If provided, forecourts shall be at least 10 feet wide if serving one unit, 12 feet wide if serving two or three units, or 15 feet wide if serving four units.
Depth. Forecourts shall be at least as deep as they are wide.
Stairs. Stairs within a forecourt access units on an upper story. 80 General Standards
Design Standards Applicant City Use Only
Complete N/A Complete N/A
3.4 Roofs
Roofline Modulation. Residential buildings two or more stories shall feature roofline modulation and/or pitched roof variation.
Flat Roofs. Flat roofs shall not cover more than 50 percent of the building’s footprint, and shall feature a screening parapet topped with a coping, cornice at least 3 feet in height. (Modern style buildings exempt from requirement) Roof-Mounted Equipment. Roof-mounted equipment (e.g., air conditioning, heating, ventilation, and associated vents and exhausts) on multifamily buildings shall be screened from a horizontal line of sight pursuant to AVMC 15.62.080.
Antennas. Wireless communications, television, dish, amateur radio, and other antennas shall comply with the provisions of Chapters 15.42 and 15.44 AVMC.
3.5 Materials
Material List. Residential developments shall adhere to Table 3-1 of the ODS.
Four-Sided Architecture. All elevations shall contain the same primary materials and trim treatment.
Material Changes. Changes in material or color shall occur at inside corners of intersecting walls or at architectural features that break up the wall plane, such as columns.
3.6 Doors, Windows, and Trim
Trim. All windows and exterior doors shall either be recessed from the plane of the surrounding exterior wall or shall have a trim or windowsill.
When trim is used, a minimum of 0.5 inch by 3 inch trim is required, which is of a different color to the primary color of the building.
On stucco walls, when no trim is used, a minimum of 1 inch deep, raised relief around the window is required.
On brick or stone walls, when no trim is used, a minimum 2 inch wide brickmold is required around windows.
Doorbells shall be provided within 2 feet of the front door.
Entry doors for individual units shall include a viewport.
Glass shall be clear without reflective coating or dark tinting. Lightly tinted glazing less than 15% is acceptable.
Openable windows shall include screens.
3.7 Garages and Carports
Recess. Garage doors shall be set back at least 6 to 18 inches from the rest of the façade.
Treatments. Garage fixtures and wall treatments shall utilize materials and colors otherwise permitted for the selected architectural style category. Garages shall feature at least two design elements listed in the ODS.
Carports. Carport structures shall utilize the same colors, architectural finishes, and roofing materials as the residential building(s) it serves.
81 General Standards
Design Standards Applicant City Use Only
Complete N/A Complete N/A
3.8 Accessory Elements
Patios shall have a minimum area of 60 square feet with a minimum dimension of 6 feet in each direction.
Patios shall be separated from common or public areas by a fence or wall.
Balconies shall have a minimum area of 50 square feet with a minimum dimension of 5 feet in one direction. This dimension excludes areas for permanent equipment and storage.
Balconies shall be recessed a minimum of 1 foot partially recessed into the building façade. The maximum projection shall be 50 percent of the balcony’s full depth or 5 feet, whichever is less.
The underside of projecting balconies shall be finished with building material as the rest of the structure.
No balconies shall overhang into the public right-of-way or sidewalk, not including the portion of the building setback behind the existing lot line.
Roof decks shall have a minimum area of 50 square feet with a minimum dimension of 5 feet in one direction. This dimension excludes areas for permanent equipment and storage.
The sides of the roof deck shall be finished with building material that matches the rest of the building.
Roof decks shall not overhang from the building façade.
Mailboxes shall be located within one block of the residential units.
4.1 Large Scale Residential - The supplemental standards in this section apply to residential developments with a density of 25 units per acre or more.
4.2 - Site Planning
Larger (60+ unit) structures shall utilize major modulations, and may utilize elevated pedestrian walkways to connect different wings of a building that are formed by major modulations to provide ADA-compliant pedestrian access between all residential units and shared amenities of a development.
Corner Elements. Large multifamily buildings and mixed-use buildings sited on a corner shall provide at least two decorative features listed in the ODS.
Elevated Walkway Width. The walkway shall have a minimum width of 5 feet and a maximum width of 8 feet.
Elevated Walkway Height. The minimum height clearance from the ground to an elevated pedestrian walkway shall be 12 feet.
The interior vertical clearance for each level of a pedestrian walkway shall be 8 feet. 82 General Standards
Design Standards Applicant City Use Only
Complete N/A Complete N/A
4.3 Architecture and Materials
Major Modulations. A major modulation in facade depth, extending from grade to roof, shall be provided along facades greater than 150 feet in length. For such facades, a major modulation shall be provided for each 150 feet of building frontage. Major modulations shall be at least 10 feet deep and 25 feet in length.
Minor Modulations. A 5-foot change in facade depth no shorter than 15 feet in length and 10 feet in height shall be provided for every 50 feet of building frontage.
Stepbacks. As required in Table 15.18.030 of the AVMC, all minimum perimeter setbacks shall be increased one foot for every foot in height above 35 feet (except for setbacks from interior property lines).
Roofline Modulation. Large buildings shall also utilize at least one of the following techniques to modulate their rooflines, in addition to the standard roofline modulation listed in Section 3.4.
Blank Façades. Features such as trellises, screens, modulations, material changes, and landscaping shall cover at least 50 percent of all blank façades
4.4 Landscaping and Open Space - Landscaping shall be provided in accordance with the provisions of AVMC 15.62.060.
4.5 - Mixed Use
A minimum of 50 percent of a mixed-use building’s commercial or office components shall be located on the ground floor.
Common residential open space shall not be publicly-accessible.
Entrances to upper floor uses shall be provided through a common entrance fronting a street.
There shall be a ground-floor entrance to either a commercial, residential, open space, or parking use every 50 feet along the building’s street-facing frontages.
Service entries, loading areas, and trash areas associated with commercial uses shall not be immediately adjacent to residential uses.
The windows, doors, and other access points of commercial uses shall be oriented to not face residential uses within 50 feet.
Commercial buildings shall face public streets and be sited either adjacent to or in front of the residential component of a horizontal mixed-use development.
Residential uses shall be located at the rear or sides of the site.
Parking for commercial uses shall be located at the center of the site, allowing the parking to provide a buffer from on-site residential uses and maximize shared parking opportunities between residential and commercial uses.
If provided, dedicated private residential parking areas shall be separated from public commercial parking with a dedicated entrance.
The commercial, residential, and open space areas of a horizontal mixed use project shall be connected via internal pathways. 83 City of Aliso Viejo
AGENDA ITEM
DATE: June 17, 2026
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Ann Eifert, Director of Financial Services
SUBJECT: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
Recommended Action:
Ratify accounts payable checks and electronic funds transfers issued between May 22, 2026, and June 4, 2026, in the amount of $212,361.86.
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditures in the amount of $212,361.86.
Background:
The City issues accounts payable checks on a bi-weekly basis and presents them to the City Council for ratification at its next regularly scheduled City Council meeting.
Discussion:
The attached registers containing checks and electronic funds transfers issued between May 22, 2026, and June 4, 2026, for $212,361.86, are being presented for ratification. All payments have been made in compliance with the City’s purchasing policy and procedures. Payments have been reviewed and approved by the appropriate departmental staff. The issued accounts payable checks and electronic funds transfers have been reviewed and deemed in accordance with the fiscal year budget by the Director of Financial Services.
Attachment:
1. Accounts Payable Report
84 Accounts Payable
Description (Item)Vendor Name Amount
101 - GENERAL FUND
APR'26 BBK CEQA & ENVIRONMENTAL-SHEABEST BEST & KRIEGER 8,813.80 APR'26 BBK APP INITIATED REIMB(AIR)-SHEABEST BEST & KRIEGER 4,572.50 APR'26 BBK APP INITIATED REIMB(AIR)-MERITAGEBEST BEST & KRIEGER 2,542.50 APR'26 BBK APP INITIATED REIMB(AIR)-CITYSIDE FIBERBEST BEST & KRIEGER 1,081.00 APR'26 FISCAL IMPACT SERVICESKOSMONT & ASSOCIATES 105.30 APR'26 LANDSCAPE PLAN PEER REVIEW-POLARIS PROJECTRJM DESIGN GROUP INC 877.65 APR'26 LANDSCAPE PLAN REVIEW - 15 ARGONAUTRJM DESIGN GROUP INC 780.00 APR'26 TRAFFIC STUDY PEER REVIEW SERVICESSTC TRAFFIC, INC 400.00 APR'26 TRAFFIC STUDY PEER REVIEW SERVICESSTC TRAFFIC, INC 1,150.00 APR'26 TRAFFIC STUDY PEER REVIEW-POLARISADVANTEC CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC 990.00 CD-2026-01022_54-64 MEADOWOOD_ROOF PROROOF PRO 500.00
CD-2025-00108_159-173 NIGHT HERON LN_ANTIS ROOFINGANTIS ROOFING & WATERPROOFING 1,700.00 MAY'26 AP SECURE LIVE SCAN FEESCHARLES C STILL 67.00
CS 5/12 RALPHS-CPR TRAININGUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 86.67 CS 5/15 PAVILIONS-CPR TRAININGUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 98.76 CS 5/18 CHICK-FIL-A CITY MANAGER WELCOME BREAKFASTUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 327.67 JUL'26 EAP PROGRAMHEALTH AND HUMAN RESOURCE CENTER INC 102.90 MAR'26 - CCLK OFFICE SUPPLIESSTAPLES ADVANTAGE 98.18
AE 5/14 TOWN AND COUNTRY-CAPIO CONF PKG L. TORRESUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 60.00 AVMC-WEB UPDATE/9PGS ORD2026-252ICC GENERAL CODE, INC 193.50 APR'26 BBK GENERAL RETAINER LEGAL SERVICESBEST BEST & KRIEGER 25,792.00 APR'26 AGENDA REPORTS (NON-RETAINER)BEST BEST & KRIEGER 679.80 APR'26 BBK LABOR & EMPLOYMENT (SPECIALIZED)BEST BEST & KRIEGER 6,419.50 APR'26 BBK GENERAL LITIGATIONBEST BEST & KRIEGER 416.40 APR-JUN'26 SALES TAX CONTRACT SERVICEHINDERLITER DE LLAMAS & ASSOCIATES 2,500.00 APR-JUN'26 SALES TAX RECOVERY SERVICEHINDERLITER DE LLAMAS & ASSOCIATES 574.05 APR-JUN'26 SALES TAX CONTRACT SERVICEHINDERLITER DE LLAMAS & ASSOCIATES 74.00 IA 10/28 GOOGLE - EOC YOUTUBE SUBSCRUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 82.99 IA 11/19 AMAZON PRIME-VIDEOUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 8.07 IA 11/12 GODADDY.COM-ALISOVIEJOFAMILYRESOURCECENTEUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 22.19 IA 11/08 GODADDY.COM-ALISOVIEJOCONFCENTER.COMUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 22.19 IA 11/16 WAITWHILE SUBSCRIPTIONUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 196.00 IA 11/11 GODADDY.COM-AVCITY DOMAIN RENEWALUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 158.35 IA 11/01 GODADDY.COM-SSLVPN.AVCITY.ORGUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 99.99 IA 11/23 AMAZON PRIME-VIDEO CHANNELUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 7.49 IA 10/22 TOWN AND COUNTRY RESORT-MISAC 2025 CONFUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 1,041.72 IA 11/18 PHILZ COFFEE-IT DEPT MTGUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 28.12 APR'26 RICOH COPY ROOM LEASE (2624)-PRINCIPALRICOH USA 638.66 APR'26 RICOH COPY ROOM LEASE (2624)-INTERESTRICOH USA 55.54 MAY'26 RICOH COPY ROOM LEASE (2624)-PRINCIPALRICOH USA 640.07 MAY'26 RICOH COPY ROOM LEASE (2624)-INTERESTRICOH USA 54.13 JUN'26 RICOH COPY ROOM LEASE (2624)-PRINCIPALRICOH USA 641.47 JUN'26 RICOH COPY ROOM LEASE (2624)-INTERESTRICOH USA 52.73 NOV'25-JAN'26 RICOH 2504EX SUITE 200 PRINTS (2936)RICOH USA 19.42 JAN'26 RICOH 2504EX FRONT COUNTER PRINTS (4456)RICOH USA 64.54 FEB'26 RICOH RSI CLOUD SUBSCRIPTION (SW1860708)RICOH USA 25.53 JAN'26 RICOH 2504 BACK-OFFICE PRINTS (4542)RICOH USA 75.60 DEC'25-FEB'26 RICOH C5300S PRINT ROOM PRINTS(2624)RICOH USA 227.40 FEB'26 RICOH 2504EX FRONT COUNTER PRINTS (4456)RICOH USA 76.60 MAR'26 RICOH RSI CLOUD SUBSCRIPTION (SW1860708)RICOH USA 25.53 FEB'26 RICOH 2504 BACK-OFFICE PRINTS (4542)RICOH USA 71.89 MAR'26 RICOH 2504EX FRONT COUNTER PRINTS (4456)RICOH USA 65.48 APR'26 RICOH RSI CLOUD SUBSCRIPTION (SW1860708)RICOH USA 25.53 MAR'26 RICOH 2504 BACK-OFFICE PRINTS (4542)RICOH USA 87.40 FEB-MAR'26 RICOH 2504EX SUITE 200 PRINTS (2936)RICOH USA 17.19 APR'26 RICOH 2504EX FRONT COUNTER PRINTS (4456)RICOH USA 55.28 85 Description (Item)Vendor Name Amount
MAY'26 RICOH RSI CLOUD SUBSCRIPTION (SW1860708)RICOH USA 25.53 APR'26 RICOH 2504 BACK-OFFICE PRINTS (4542)RICOH USA 65.92 MAR'26-2 CH & STE 200 FIRST AID MAINT & SUPPLIESCINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 198.85 MAR'26 - COPY&BREAKROOM SUPPLIES NON DEPARTMENTALSTAPLES ADVANTAGE 400.88 MAY'26 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE VISTA PARKNIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 1,100.11 MAY'26 VEHICLE FUELVOYAGER FLEET SYSTEMS INC 880.29
JNL 4/22 NEKTER-QUARTERLY LUNCHEON RAFFLE PRIZESUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 30.90 JB 5/11 OC WINE MART & DELI-STAFF MEETINGUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 69.98 JB 5/13 COSTCO-BREAKROOM SUPPLIESUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 86.98 JNL 4/22 STARBUCKS-REC SPEC INTERVIEW PANEL COFFEEUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 17.45 JNL 4/23 WEBBS-REC SPEC INTERVIEW PANEL LUNCHUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 129.89 LOGO CONTEST FIRST PRIZE WINNER (LAYLA PEDROZA)RODRIGO PEDROZA 500.00 LOGO CONTEST 2ND PRIZE WINNER (SAVANNAH L ROMVARI)SAVANNAH LEIGH ROMVARI 250.00 MAY'26 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE IGLESIA PARKNIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 7,319.43 4/09/26-5/11/26 MTR#4114 IGLESIA PARK WATEREL TORO WATER DISTRICT 741.82 4/09/26-5/11/26 MTR#3499 IGLEISA PARK WATEREL TORO WATER DISTRICT 817.44 MAR'26 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES - IGLESIA CENTERSIGNAL HILL AUTO ENTERPRISES, INC 225.96 MAY'26 JANITORIAL SERVICES - IGLESIATEAM ONE MANAGEMENT 1,064.00 4/09/26-5/11/26 MTR#5016 IGLESIA PARK BLDG WATEREL TORO WATER DISTRICT 307.43 JUN'26 MURCAL IOT SMARTCOMMAND MONITORING SERVICEMURPHY SWITCH OF CA 450.00 MAY'26 SOUTH OC CITY ENG MEETING REIMB - QLQUANG LE 25.00 SP 4/29 CEAOC-5/04/26 MEETING-QL SPUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 60.00 SP 5/05 PWX-CONFERENCE REG 8/30-9/02/26-SPUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 919.00 SP 4/22 AMAZON-NPDES STORM SEWER TESTING DYEUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 39.24 MAY'26 BMW REPAIR-MOTORCYCLE SERVICESEAVCO INC 1,685.90 JD 4/24 THE TOLL ROADS OF OCUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 575.00 JD 5/14 WALMART-OFFICE SUPPLIESUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 4.12 JD 5/14 WALMART-OFFICE SUPPLIESUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 26.81 JD 4/29 TARGET-OFFICE SUPPLIESUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 33.47 JD 5/14 WALMART-OFFICE SUPPLIESUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 69.67 JD 5/14 SMART AND FINAL-CLEANING/BREAKRM SUPPLIESUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 85.06 JD 5/21 LOWES-WATER FILTER REPLACEMENTSUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 146.52 JD 5/14 KEURIG COFFEE- COFFEE MAKER AND FILTER KITUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 826.24 JD 5/19 WALMART-OFFICE SUPPLIESUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM (8.06) JD 4/25 ACCO BRANDS DIRECT-(3) MAGNETIC DRY ERASEUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 881.51 5/10-5/23/26 460 HRS-CROSSING GUARD SERVICESALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES 15,874.60 JAN'26 TECH CHARGES/RADIO REPAIRCOUNTY OF ORANGE 1,301.34 AED LICENSING RENEWAL AT AVRZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION 1,557.00 JD 4/30 AV SELF STORAGE-#75 PUBLIC SAFETY MAY'26US BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 490.00 GENERAL FUND TOTAL: 104,865.56
102 - GEN. FD-CITY HALL
JUN'26 CH ELEVATOR MAINTENANCETHURSTON ELEVATOR CONCEPTS INC 140.00 MAY'26 JANITORIAL MAINTENANCE - CHTEAM ONE MANAGEMENT 3,400.00 FY25-26 CH GENERATOR SCAQMD HOT SPOTS PROGRAM FEESOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MGMT DIST 172.49 MAY'26 CH INTERIOR PLANT MAINTENANCEFOSTERS' GARDENS INC 115.00 JUN'26 CH ASO ASSOCIATION DUESPACIFIC PARK II ASSOCIATION 641.00 MAY'26 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE CHNIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 200.00 MAY'26 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE CHNIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 524.89 GEN. FD-CITY HALL TOTAL: 5,193.38
103 - GF-AV RECREATION SERVICES
MAY'26 REC1 OTHER INCOME-ADMIN/NON-RESIDENT CTY006LIA BERMAN 15.00 MAY'26 REC1 CITY DAY CAMP REFUND CTY006LIA BERMAN 284.00 MAY'26 REC1REFUND FEE CTY006LIA BERMAN (50.00)
APR'26 PLUMBING PIPE REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT-AVRUNITED BUILDING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES LLC 1,520.00 SPRING2026-SPN097/095 DANCE-2 PARTICIPANTSROXANNE BELL 172.25 SPRING2026-SPN056/101 YOGA-19 PARTICIPANTSJOY E. TORRES 1,584.60 SPRING2026-SPN015 MUSIC-4 PARTICIPANTSMUSIC MOVES ACADEMY INC 432.00 SPRING2026-SPN085/210/087 DANCE-27 PARTICIPANTSYUKA GARRETT 1,536.00 SPRING2026-SPN054/024 GYMNASTICS-11 PARTICIPANTSTUMBLE-N-KIDS, INC 858.00 SPRING2026-SPN083 WATERCOLOR-5 PARTICIPANTSSAHAR ALVIRI 360.00 SPRING2026-SPN049 BROADWAY MUSICAL-6 PARTICIPANTSJENNIFER BALES 468.00 SPRING2026-SPN035/036 SOCCER-14 PARTICIPANTS425 VENTURES, LLC 1,344.60 86 Description (Item)Vendor Name Amount
SPRING2026-SPN084/SPN048 PIANO-11 PARTICIPANTSSOPHI ALBERT 924.00 MAY'26 GCF SECURITY SERVICESLYONS SECURITY SERVICE IN 1,741.25 MAY'26 AVR SECURITY SERVICESLYONS SECURITY SERVICE IN 3,876.25 SPRING2026-SPN107 YOGA-3 PARTICIPANTSRUIHONG LI 162.00
SPRING2026-SPN072/068/028 TENNIS-8 PARTICIPANTSJOHN DAVID ALLEN JR 282.60 SPRING2026-SPN201 BASKETBALL-5 PARTICIPANTSBREAKTHROUGH SPORTS LLC 204.00 SPRING2026-SPN100 TAI CHI-5 PARTICIPANTSRONALD S. COHAN 66.00 JAN-MAR'26 C2500 AVR PRINTS (8774)RICOH USA 379.91
MAY'26 AVR INTERIOR PLANT MAINTENANCEFOSTERS' GARDENS INC 110.00 APR'26 JANITORIAL SERVICES - AVRTEAM ONE MANAGEMENT 5,600.00 MAY'26 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE AVRNIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 2,419.14 5/07 SAFETY EQUIPMENT - AVRW W GRAINGER INC 281.51
5/22 EMERGENCY SAFETY SIGNAGE - AVRW W GRAINGER INC 26.88 JB 5/14 SWIMOUTLET-MEMBERSHIP FOR CDC RASHGUARDUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 5.37 JB 5/14 CHAUPAIN BAKERY-SUMMER CAMP INSTRUCTOR MTGUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 150.80 GF-AV RECREATION SERVICES TOTAL: 24,754.16
203 - GAS TAX
APR'26 TRAFFIC SIGNAL OPSITERIS, INC 5,558.00
MAY'26 USA DATABASE MAINT + 43 TICKETSUNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT OF SOUTHERN CA 102.45 MAY'26 ACCT#7241 LS1 ST LIGHTS ELECTRICITYSO CAL EDISON 18,795.27 MAY'26 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE MEDIANSNIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 1,695.68 FY25-26 ETWD CALLE CORTEZ MEDIANEL TORO WATER DISTRICT 176.59 GAS TAX TOTAL: 26,327.99
231 - OTHER GRANTS
APR'26 PLHA GRANT REIMBURSEMENT-CASE MANAGEMENTLAURA'S HOUSE 1,288.00 JUN'26 38 COLONIAL WAY HOA FEES- BALANCE DUEVANTIS MAINTENANCE CORPORATION 72.72 Q3 FY25-26 PLHA AFF0RDABLE HOUSING CASE MANAGEMENTFAMILY ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES 5,910.21 JUN'26 35 PLAYA CIR HOA FEE BALANCE DUEHARBOR STATION MAINTENANCE 70.00 JUN'26 89 PLAYA CIR HOA FEES BALANCE DUEHARBOR STATION MAINTENANCE 70.00 OTHER GRANTS TOTAL: 7,410.93
261 - CITY FAC.-AQUATIC CENTER
JUN'26 AQC RETENTION FEESPREMIER AQUATIC SERVICES (1,208.70) JAN'26 AQC 12/31 CDTA-OCT-DEC'25 SALES TAXPREMIER AQUATIC SERVICES 61.00 APR'26 AQC POOL CHEMICALS - CHLORINE & ACIDHASA INC 2,139.62 JUN'26 AQC MANAGEMENT FEESPREMIER AQUATIC SERVICES 12,087.00 MAY'26 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE AQCNIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 975.59 MAY'26 JANITORIAL SERVICES - AQCTEAM ONE MANAGEMENT 2,399.41 JAN'26 AQC 1/01 JACKRABBIT-SERVICE PLATFORMPREMIER AQUATIC SERVICES 315.00 JAN'26 AQC 1/19 HOME DEPOT-FACILITY SUPPLIESPREMIER AQUATIC SERVICES 32.28 JAN'26 AQC 1/22 CHEVRON-PROPANE EXCHANGEPREMIER AQUATIC SERVICES 28.00 JAN'26 AQC 1/15 WALMART-FACILITY SUPPLIESPREMIER AQUATIC SERVICES 74.63 JAN'26 AQC 1/19 AMAZON - FACILITY ITEMSPREMIER AQUATIC SERVICES 66.65 JAN'26 AQC 1/23 WALMART-FACILITY SUPPLIESPREMIER AQUATIC SERVICES 97.18 JAN'26 AQC 1/17 HOME DEPOT-FACILITY SUPPLIESPREMIER AQUATIC SERVICES 16.14 JAN'26 AQC 1/15 HOME DEPOT-FACILITY SUPPLIESPREMIER AQUATIC SERVICES 11.07 JAN'26 AQC 1/20 AMAZON - OFFICE SUPPLIESPREMIER AQUATIC SERVICES 18.05 JAN'26 AQC 1/20 AMAZON - MINOR EQUIPMENTPREMIER AQUATIC SERVICES 20.74 JAN'26 AQC 1/19 AMAZON - UMBRELLA BASESPREMIER AQUATIC SERVICES 760.14 JAN'26 AQC 1/31 INDEED-ADVERTISINGPREMIER AQUATIC SERVICES 53.80 JAN'26 AQC 1/31 GOOGLE-ADVERTISINGPREMIER AQUATIC SERVICES 302.63 CITY FAC.-AQUATIC CENTER TOTAL: 18,250.23
331 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
4/13-4/20/26 PORTABLE RESTR00MS - AQC IMPROVEMENTSUNITED SITE SERVICES OF CALIFORNIA, INC 350.73 LOCKER ROOM FLOOR RE-SURFACE PROJECT-AQCUNITED BUILDING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES LLC 23,250.00 SUITE 200 - POLICE SERVICES HALLWAY ENTRANCE SIGNSTARFISH SIGNS & GRAPHICS, INC 687.54 87 Description (Item)Vendor Name Amount
SP 05/06 AMAZON-VISTA PARK PLAYGROUND SEALANTUS BANK PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM 1,271.34 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL: 25,559.61
GRAND TOTAL: 212,361.86
Fund Summary
Payment AmountFund Expense Amount
101 - GENERAL FUND 104,865.56104,865.56
102 - GEN. FD-CITY HALL 5,193.385,193.38
103 - GF-AV RECREATION SERVICES 24,754.1624,754.16
203 - GAS TAX 26,327.9926,327.99
231 - OTHER GRANTS 7,410.937,410.93
261 - CITY FAC.-AQUATIC CENTER 18,250.2318,250.23
331 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 25,559.6125,559.61
212,361.86Grand Total: 212,361.86
88 Accounts Payable Payable Dates: 5/22/2026 - 6/4/2026 6/3/2026 6:03:23 PM Page 5 of 6
Report Summary
Fund Summary
Payment AmountFund
101 - GENERAL FUND 104,865.56
102 - GEN. FD-CITY HALL 5,193.38
103 - GF-AV RECREATION SERVICES 24,754.16
203 - GAS TAX 26,327.99
231 - OTHER GRANTS 7,410.93
261 - CITY FAC.-AQUATIC CENTER 18,250.23
331 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 25,559.61
212,361.86Grand Total:
Account Summary
Payment AmountAccount Number Account Name
101-2602-000 PLANNING DEPOSIT 20,231.75
101-2603-000 ENGINEERING DEPOSIT 1,081.00
101-2606-000 C & D DEPOSIT 2,200.00
101-4-1503-4309-000 OTHER CONTRACTUAL S… 169.90
101-4-1503-4520-000 MTGS/CONF./TRNG & D… 513.10
101-4-1601-4520-000 MTGS/CONF./TRNG & D… 60.00
101-4-1601-4601-000 SUPPLIES 98.18
101-4-1601-4734-000 CODIFICATION 193.50
101-4-2101-4304-000 LEGAL SERVICES 25,792.00
101-4-2101-4532-000 SPECIAL PROJECTS 7,099.30
101-4-2101-4735-000 LITIGATION 416.40
101-4-2501-4301-000 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,148.05
101-4-3101-4305-000 TECHNOLOGY SERVICES 82.99
101-4-3101-4481-000 COMPUTER EXPENSE 514.28
101-4-3101-4520-000 MTGS/CONF./TRNG & D… 1,069.84
101-4-3501-4421-000 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 227.40
101-4-3501-4422-000 EQUIP RENTAL LEASE - P… 1,920.20
101-4-3501-4431-000 BUILDING & GROUND M… 1,100.11
101-4-3501-4513-000 PRINTING 701.44
101-4-3501-4516-000 FUEL 880.29
101-4-3501-4542-000 INTEREST EXPENSE - LEA… 162.40
101-4-3501-4601-000 SUPPLIES 599.73
101-4-3501-4612-000 OPERATING SUPPLIES 30.90
101-4-4101-4520-000 MTGS/CONF./TRNG & D… 217.32
101-4-4101-4527-000 REC-CITY SPECIAL EVENTS 750.00
101-4-4101-4601-000 SUPPLIES 86.98
101-4-4102-4411-000 UTILITIES 1,559.26
101-4-4102-4431-000 BUILDING & GROUND M… 7,319.43
101-4-4103-4411-000 UTILITIES 307.43
101-4-4103-4431-000 BUILDING & GROUND M… 1,289.96
101-4-4501-4520-000 MTGS/CONF/TRNG & D… 1,004.00
101-4-4501-4701-000 NPDES 489.24
101-4-5102-4462-000 EQUIP MAINT-800MHZ … 1,301.34
101-4-5102-4516-000 FUEL 575.00
101-4-5102-4517-000 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 1,685.90
101-4-5102-4612-000 OPERATING SUPPLIES 2,065.34
101-4-5102-4721-000 C.S-CROSSING GUARDS 15,874.60
101-4-5401-4471-000 RENT 490.00
101-4-5401-4612-000 OPERATING SUPPLIES 1,557.00
102-4-3501-4431-000 BUILDING & GROUND M… 5,020.89
102-4-3501-4561-000 TAXES/FEES/PERMITS 172.49
103-34150 OTHER INCOME 15.00
103-34162 CITY CAMP REVENUE 284.00
103-34169 REFUNDS -50.00
103-4-4105-4305-000 TECHNOLOGY SERVICES 379.91
103-4-4105-4309-000 OTHER CONTRACTUAL S… 8,394.05
89 Accounts Payable Payable Dates: 5/22/2026 - 6/4/2026 6/3/2026 6:03:23 PM Page 6 of 6
Account Summary
Payment AmountAccount Number Account Name
103-4-4105-4431-000 BUILDING & GROUND M… 13,833.78
103-4-4105-4451-000 FARM OPERATING EXPE… 1,741.25
103-4-4105-4570-000 CITY CAMP EXPENSE 156.17
203-4-4502-4301-000 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5,558.00
203-4-4503-4411-000 UTILITIES 18,971.86
203-4-4503-4771-000 C.S-STREET MAINTENAN… 1,798.13
231-4-6131-4309-000 OTHER CONTRACTUAL S… 7,410.93
261-2102-000 VOUCHERS PAYABLE 61.00
261-2103-000 RETENTIONS PAYABLE -1,208.70
261-4-6161-7402-000 COMPUTER EXPENSE 315.00
261-4-6161-7421-000 BUILDING & GROUND M… 3,375.00
261-4-6161-7425-000 POOL MAINTENANCE 2,139.62
261-4-6161-7431-000 SUPPLIES 364.74
261-4-6161-7432-000 MINOR EQUIPMENT 760.14
261-4-6161-7441-000 MARKETING 356.43
261-4-6161-7451-000 MANAGEMENT FEES 12,087.00
331-4-8701-5910-000 IMPROVEMENTS 25,559.61
Grand Total: 212,361.86
Project Account Summary
Payment AmountProject Account Key
**None** 149,497.45
0055910 1,271.34
0575910 687.54
1002SPRING 8,394.05
10044309 7,410.93
1185910 23,600.73
9024612 30.90
9974570 156.17
ENG 5081 1,081.00
SDP-2024-00002 3,797.80
SDP-2025-00004 13,386.30
SDP-2026-01000 1,867.65
SDP-2026-01001 1,180.00
Grand Total: 212,361.86
90 City of Aliso Viejo
AGENDA ITEM
DATE: June 17, 2026
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Shaun Pelletier, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: FISCAL YEAR 2 6-27 PROJECT LIST FOR ROAD MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION ACCOUNT FUNDING (SB 1)
Recommended Action:
Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Aliso Viejo which adopts a list of projects for fiscal year 2026-27 funded by SB 1: The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017.
Fiscal Impact:
SB 1 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) funds are projected to be about $1,453,263 in FY 26-27.
Background:
The Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) funding began in January 2018, with funds collected of around $9.5 million through the remainder of this year and about $1,450,000 next fiscal year.
Current year funds were applied toward Glenwood Drive (73 to Aliso Creek) construction, and Aliso Viejo Parkway (Enterprise to Aliso Creek) design. Additional projects included Aliso Viejo Parkway (Enterprise to Aliso Creek) construction , Cedarbrook (Glenwood to Aliso Viejo Parkway) Rehabilitation construction, Slurry Seal Area 1 construction, all of which have been delayed until FY 26-27.
Discussion:
Use of RMRA funds requires additional reporting through the California Transportation Commission (CTC). Each year, the Council approved projects proposed to utilize the funds must be submitted to the CTC for approval. Expenditure reports are subsequent ly due at the end of each year to account for the funds. The required Resolution, adopting the project list to be sent to CTC, is attached for Council approval.
91
Projects utilizing SB 1 funds in FY 26-27 may include the following.
Cedarbrook (Glenwood to Aliso Viejo Parkway) Rehabilitation (Construction) Aliso Viejo Parkway (Enterprise to Aliso Creek) Rehabilitation (Construction) Slurry Seal Areas 1 and 2 (Construction)
Columbia & Argonaut Rehabilitation (Construction)
Staff recommends approval of the attached resolution.
Environmental:
Each proposed project will include required environmental actions prior to commencing construction.
Attachment(s):
1. Resolution
92 RESOLUTION NO. 2026-____
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ALISO VIEJO ADOPTING A LIST OF PROJECTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 FUNDED BY SB 1: THE ROAD REPAIR AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017
WHEREAS, Senate Bill 1 (SB 1), the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (Chapter 5, Statutes of 2017) was passed by the Legislature and Signed into law by the Governor in April 2017 in order to address the significant multi -modal transportation funding shortfalls statewide; and
WHEREAS, SB 1 includes accountability and transparency provisions that will ensure the residents of the City of Aliso Viejo are aware of the projects proposed for funding in our community and which projects have been completed each fiscal year; and
WHEREAS, the City of Aliso Viejo must adopt by resolution a list of all projects proposed to receive funding from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA), created by SB 1, which must include a description and the location of each proposed project, a proposed schedule for the project’s completion, and the estimated useful life of the improvement; and
WHEREAS, the City of Aliso Viejo , will receive an estimated $1,453,263 in RMRA funding in Fiscal Year 2026-27 from SB 1; and
WHEREAS, this is the ninth year in which the City of Aliso Viejo is receiving SB 1 funding and will enable the City to continue essential road maintenance and rehabilitation projects, safety improvements , and increasing access and mobility options fo r the traveling public that would not have other wise been possible without SB 1; and
WHEREAS, the City of Aliso Viejo used a Pavement Management System to develop the SB 1 project list to ensure revenues are being used on the most high-priority and cost-effective projects; and
WHEREAS, the funding from SB 1 will help the City of Aliso Viejo maintain and rehabilitate arterial, collector and/or local streets throughout the City this year as well as into the future; and
WHEREAS, the 201 8 California Statewide Local Streets and Roads Needs Assessment found that the City of Aliso Viejo’s streets are in a Good condition and this revenue will help us increase the overall quality of our road system and over the next decade will maintain our streets and roads in a Good condition; and
93 WHEREAS, the SB 1 project list and overall investment in our local streets and roads infrastructure with a focus on basic maintenance and safety, investing in complete streets infrastructure, and using cutting-edge technology, materials and practices, will have significant positive co-benefits statewide.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City of Aliso Viejo as follows:
1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.
2. The fiscal year 20 26-2027 list of projects planned to be funded with Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account revenues include:
1. Slurry Seal FY 26-27 – Area 1 (Construction)
Description: Street patching, crack filling, slurry seal, pavement markings
Estimated Construction Schedule:
Start 03/27 – Completion 06/27
Estimated Useful Life: 5-10 years
2. Slurry Seal FY 26-27 – Area 2 (Construction)
Description: Street patching, crack filling, slurry seal, pavement markings
Estimated Construction Schedule:
Start 03/27 – Completion 06/27
Estimated Useful Life: 5-10 years
3. Cedarbrook Rehabilitation – Glenwood Drive to Aliso Viejo Parkway (Construction)
Description: Prepare construction documents for street patching, asphalt milling, asphalt overlay, utility structure adjustments, sidewalk improvements, pavement markings
Estimated Pre-Construction Schedule:
Start 07/25 – Completion 09/25
Estimated Construction Schedule:
Start 07/26 – Completion 10/26
Estimated Useful Life: 10-20 years
4. Aliso Viejo Parkway Rehabilitation – Enterprise to Aliso Creek Road (Construction)
94 Description: Prepare construction documents for street patching, asphalt milling, asphalt overlay, utility structure adjustments, sidewalk improvements, pavement markings
Estimated Pre-Construction Schedule:
Start 07/24 – Completion 06/25
Estimated Construction Schedule:
Start 07/26 – Completion 10/26
Estimated Useful Life: 10-20 years
5. Columbia and Argonaut Rehabilitation – Entire Streets (Construction)
Description: Prepare construction documents for street patching, asphalt milling, asphalt overlay, utility structure adjustments, sidewalk improvements, pavement markings
Estimated Pre-Construction Schedule:
Start 07/25 – Completion 06/26
Estimated Construction Schedule:
Start 10/26 – Completion 12/26
Estimated Useful Life: 10-20 years
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of June, 2026.
________________________
Max Duncan
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
________________________ ________________________
Scott C. Smith Maria Kendig
City Attorney City Clerk
95 City of Aliso Viejo
AGENDA ITEM
DATE: June 17, 2026
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Shaun Pelletier, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: RENEWED MEASURE M ELIGIBILITY
Recommended Action:
1. Adopt a 7-year Capital Improvements Program (CIP) for Street Projects;
2. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Aliso Viejo concerning the status of the Pavement Management Plan; and
3. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Aliso Viejo concerning the status of the Local Signal Synchronization Plan.
Fiscal Impact:
The City will receive approximately $7. 78 million in FY 202 6-27 through FY 20 32-33 in Measure M2 Fair Share funds.
Background:
To maintain eligibility to receive Measure M2 sales tax revenue, the City is required to submit annual documentation on its transportation related programs to Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). Measure M2 Fair Share funds are made available to the City annually. Cities will be apportioned Measure M2 funds by applying a formula using population; miles of MPAH designated roadways, and taxable sales. The City has also applied for and received (or been awarded) about $2.3 million in competitive funds.
Every year, OCTA requires a submittal of the City’s programs and projects affecting circulation and transportation to verify that these elements are in alignment with Measure M2 and countywide plans. This year’s submittal requires the following documentation:
96
Measure M2 7-year Capital Improvement Program (7-year CIP) The City’s 7-year CIP is a transportation planning and fiscal forecasting document used to guide future programming for transportation CIP projects. The 7-year CIP is consistent with the proposed citywide CIP Budget for FY 26-27. The submittal of the 7-year CIP does not commit the City to fund the identified improvements, but projects must be included in the 7-year CIP to be eligible to receive Measure M2 funding. This document is updated every year to allow for changes based on maintenance needs or Ci ty Council priorities.
The CIP emphasizes projects that improve circulation, mitigate traffic congestion, and maintain the City’s investment in existing transportation infrastructure.
Pavement Management Plan Update (PMP)
Each jurisdiction is required to update and certify its Pavement Management Program (PMP) every two years. The PMP is a system to monitor the condition of and perform periodic maintenance and rehabilitation of City streets and roadways. City Staff has recently updated its PMP. The Pavemen t Condition Index (PCI) average for all City streets is 81, in the Good Condition range. The standard pavement condition categories list PCI ranges as follows: Very Good (86-100), Good (75-85), Fair (60-74), Poor (41-50) and Very Poor (0-40).
Local Signal Synchronization Plan (LSSP)
The City’s LSSP is a three -year plan identifying traffic signal synchronization, street routes, and traffic signals to be improved in the City. The LSSP must be consistent with the Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization netw ork in the City and must also be consistent with signal synchronization across jurisdictions. This element must be completed every three years to be eligible to receive Measure M2 funds. This year’s LSSP incorporate the traffic signals on the Pacific Park Corridor, which the City of Aliso Viejo be the lead agency in implementing.
Discussion:
The proposed 7 -year CIP for streets is attached. The 7 -year CIP includes the City approved 5-year plan which emphasizes rehabilitation work such as slurry sealing and overlays to maintain the condition of the City’s street network. The proposed projects have been assigned to each year based upon priority rankings. Since the exact amount of the funds are not known, it is possible that some projects may not be completed in a given year, but it is important to list them to ensure Measure M funds can be utilize d where appropriate. If projects are delayed due to funding, it is staff’s intention to still complete them in the priority ranking order.
97
Environmental:
Each proposed project will include required environmental actions prior to commencing construction.
Attachments:
1. 7-year Capital Improvements Program for Street Projects
2. Pavement Management Plan Resolution
3. Pavement Management Plan
4. Resolution for Local Signal Synchronization Plan
5. Local Signal Synchronization Plan
98 Orange County Transportation Authority
FY 2026/27 - FY 2032/33 Capital Improvement Program
TIP ID CP-12606 IMPLEMENTING AGENCY Aliso Viejo, City of Local Project Number: Project Title
Additional Project IDs: Accessible Pedestrian Signals (APS) Upgrade - CDBG (FY25-26 Carryover) Type of Work: Traffic Signals Project Description
Type of Work Description: Traffic Signals - Installnew traffic signals and equipment Upgrading assessible pedestrian signals at various locations Limits
Citywide
Project Notes
FISCALYEAR FUND TYPE ENGROWCON/IMPO&MTOTAL TOTALESCALATED 2027 Community DevelopmentBlock Grant $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $100,000 $102,800 2027 Measure M2 Local Fairshare $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $10,000 $10,280 Totals: $0 $0 $110,000 $0 $110,000 $113,080
Last Revised: 26-00 - In Progress Total Programmed: $110,000 TIP ID CP-12392 IMPLEMENTING AGENCY Aliso Viejo, City of Local Project Number: 24-LNIG-TSP-4047 Project Title
Additional Project IDs: Alicia Parkway TSSP
Type of Work: Traffic Signals Project Description
Type of Work Description: Traffic Signals -Coordinate signals within project limits Aliso Viejo's portion of signal timing and equipment upgrades to Alicia Parkway Limits
Alicia Parkway from North City Limits to South CityLimits Project Notes
Project approved during 2024 CTFP call forprojects. Laguna Niguel will act as lead agency.
FISCALYEAR FUND TYPE ENGROWCON/IMPO&MTOTAL TOTALESCALATED 2027 Measure M2 LocalFairshare $0 $0 $215,226 $0 $215,226 $221,252 2027 Traffic Signal Sync Program(TSSP) $0 $0 $53,806 $0 $53,806 $55,313 Totals: $0 $0 $269,032 $0 $269,032 $276,565
Last Revised: 26-00 - In Progress Total Programmed: $269,032 TIP ID CP-12383 IMPLEMENTING AGENCY Aliso Viejo, City of Local Project Number: Project Title
Additional Project IDs: Aliso Viejo Parkway Rehabilitation from Enterprise to Aliso Creek Road Type of Work: Road Maintenance Project Description
Type of Work Description: Road Maintenance -Rehabilitation of roadway Rehabilitation of roadway including full depth replacement of failed areas, pavement grinding, andasphalt overlay (3,300 lf) Limits
Aliso Viejo Parkway from Enterprise to Aliso CreekRoad
Project Notes
FISCALYEAR FUND TYPE ENGROWCON/IMP O&MTOTAL TOTALESCALATED 2027 Local Streets and Roadsapportionments $0 $0 $1,990,000 $0 $1,990,000 $2,045,720 2027 Measure M2 LocalFairshare $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $10,000 $10,280 Totals: $0 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $2,000,000 $2,056,000
Last Revised: 26-00 - In Progress Total Programmed: $2,000,000 6/4/26, 2:44 PM ocfundtracker.octa.net/CIP/report_project_listing https://ocfundtracker.octa.net/CIP/report_project_listing 1/599 TIP ID CP-10003 IMPLEMENTING AGENCY Aliso Viejo, City of Local Project Number: Project Title
Additional Project IDs: Annual Slurry Seal Program
Type of Work: Road Maintenance Project Description
Type of Work Description: Road Maintenance -Slurry seal of roadway Annual program for slurry seal of roadways on residential streets. One fifth of the streets are sealedeach year in accordance with the Pavement Management System.
Limits
Citywide
Project Notes
FISCALYEAR FUND TYPE ENG ROWCON/IMP O&MTOTAL TOTALESCALATED 2027 Measure M2 LocalFairshare $10,000 $0 $1,910,000 $0 $1,920,000 $1,973,480 2027 Local Streets and Roadsapportionments $0 $0 $15,000 $0 $15,000 $15,420 2028 Local Streets and Roadsapportionments $0 $0 $15,000 $0 $15,000 $15,852 2028 Measure M2 LocalFairshare $10,000 $0 $725,000 $0 $735,000 $776,168 2029 Measure M2 LocalFairshare $10,000 $0 $725,000 $0 $735,000 $797,621 2029 Local Streets and Roadsapportionments $0 $0 $15,000 $0 $15,000 $16,296 2030 Local Streets and Roadsapportionments $0 $0 $15,000 $0 $15,000 $16,752 2030 Measure M2 LocalFairshare $10,000 $0 $725,000 $0 $735,000 $819,675 2031 Local Streets and Roadsapportionments $0 $0 $15,000 $0 $15,000 $17,221 2031 Measure M2 LocalFairshare $10,000 $0 $725,000 $0 $735,000 $842,345 2032 Local Streets and Roadsapportionments $0 $0 $15,000 $0 $15,000 $17,703 2032 Measure M2 LocalFairshare $10,000 $0 $725,000 $0 $735,000 $865,651 2033 Measure M2 LocalFairshare $10,000 $0 $725,000 $0 $735,000 $889,609 2033 Local Streets and Roadsapportionments $0 $0 $15,000 $0 $15,000 $18,199 Totals: $70,000 $0 $6,365,000 $0 $6,435,000 $7,081,992
Last Revised: 26-00 - In Progress Total Programmed: $6,435,000 TIP ID CP-12384 IMPLEMENTING AGENCY Aliso Viejo, City of Local Project Number: Project Title
Additional Project IDs: Argonaut Rehabilitation
Type of Work: Road Maintenance Project Description
Type of Work Description: Road Maintenance -Rehabilitation of roadway Rehabilitation of roadway including full depth replacement of failed areas, pavement grinding, andasphalt overlay (3,300 lf) Limits
Argonaut between Argonaut and Argonaut andArgonaut between Glenwood Drive and AlisoCreek Road Project Notes
FISCALYEAR FUND TYPE ENGROWCON/IMPO&MTOTAL TOTALESCALATED 2028 Measure M2 Local Fairshare $0 $0 $40,000 $0 $40,000 $42,271 2028 Local Streets and Roadsapportionments $0 $0 $741,000 $0 $741,000 $783,077 Totals: $0 $0 $781,000 $0 $781,000 $825,348
Last Revised: 26-00 - In Progress Total Programmed: $781,000 6/4/26, 2:44 PM ocfundtracker.octa.net/CIP/report_project_listing https://ocfundtracker.octa.net/CIP/report_project_listing 2/5100 TIP ID CP-12607 IMPLEMENTING AGENCY Aliso Viejo, City of Local Project Number: Project Title
Additional Project IDs: Bike Lane Striping and Signing Improvement Project Type of Work: Bikeways Project Description
Type of Work Description: Bikeways -Reconstruction/rehabilitation of existing bike route Upgrade bike lane to incorporate buffered bike lanes and transition striping at conflict areas Limits
Citywide
Project Notes
Projected funded with AQMD AB2766.
FISCALYEAR FUND TYPE ENG ROWCON/IMP O&MTOTAL TOTALESCALATED 2027 Air QualityManagement District $10,000 $0 $1,425,000 $0 $1,435,000 $1,474,900 2027 Measure M2 LocalFairshare $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $10,000 $10,280 Totals: $10,000 $0 $1,435,000 $0 $1,445,000 $1,485,180
Last Revised: 26-00 - In Progress Total Programmed: $1,445,000 TIP ID CP-12601 IMPLEMENTING AGENCY Aliso Viejo, City of Local Project Number: Project Title
Additional Project IDs: Cedarbrook Rehabilitation Project between Glenwood and Aliso Viejo Parkway Type of Work: Road Maintenance Project Description
Type of Work Description: Road Maintenance -Rehabilitation of roadway Rehabilitation of roadway including full depth replacement of failed areas, pavement grinding, andasphalt overlay (3,200 lf) Limits
Cedarbrook between Glenwood and Aliso ViejoParkway
Project Notes
FISCALYEAR FUND TYPE ENGROWCON/IMP O&MTOTAL TOTALESCALATED 2027 Measure M2 LocalFairshare $0 $0 $1,085,000 $0 $1,085,000 $1,115,380 2027 Local Streets and Roadsapportionments $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $10,000 $10,280 Totals: $0 $0 $1,095,000 $0 $1,095,000 $1,125,660
Last Revised: 26-00 - In Progress Total Programmed: $1,095,000 TIP ID CP-12385 IMPLEMENTING AGENCY Aliso Viejo, City of Local Project Number: Project Title
Additional Project IDs: Columbia Street Rehabilitation
Type of Work: Road Maintenance Project Description
Type of Work Description: Road Maintenance -Rehabilitation of roadway Rehabilitation of roadway including full depth replacement of failed areas, pavement grinding, andasphalt overlay (3,600 lf) Limits
Columbia between Columbia and Columbia andColumbia between Aliso Creek Road and AlisoViejo Parkway Project Notes
FISCALYEAR FUND TYPE ENGROWCON/IMP O&MTOTAL TOTALESCALATED 2027 Measure M2 LocalFairshare $0 $0 $1,105,000 $0 $1,105,000 $1,135,940 2027 Local Streets and Roadsapportionments $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $10,000 $10,280 Totals: $0 $0 $1,115,000 $0 $1,115,000 $1,146,220
Last Revised: 26-00 - In Progress Total Programmed: $1,115,000 6/4/26, 2:44 PM ocfundtracker.octa.net/CIP/report_project_listing https://ocfundtracker.octa.net/CIP/report_project_listing 3/5101 TIP ID CP-10004 IMPLEMENTING AGENCY Aliso Viejo, City of Local Project Number: 14-ALSO-ECP-3728 Project Title
Additional Project IDs: Dairy Fork Wetland
Type of Work: Environmental Cleanup Project Description Type of Work Description: EnvironmentalCleanup - Constructed wetlands Maintenance of wetland to improve water quality of Dairy Fork sub-watershed.
Limits
Dairy Fork Tributary Outfall
Project Notes
FISCAL YEAR FUND TYPE ENG ROW CON/IMP O&M TOTAL TOTAL ESCALATED 2027 General Fund $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000
2028 General Fund $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000
2029 General Fund $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000
2030 General Fund $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000
2031 General Fund $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000
2032 General Fund $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000
2033 General Fund $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000
Totals: $0 $0 $0 $70,000 $70,000 $70,000
Last Revised: 26-00 - In Progress Total Programmed: $70,000 TIP ID CP-12885 IMPLEMENTING AGENCY Aliso Viejo, City of Local Project Number: Project Title
Additional Project IDs: FY26-27 Accessible Pedestrian Signals (APS) Upgrade - CDBG Type of Work: Traffic Signals Project Description
Type of Work Description: Traffic Signals - Installnew traffic signals and equipment Upgrading accessible pedestrian signals at various locations Limits
Citywide
Project Notes
FISCALYEAR FUND TYPE ENGROWCON/IMPO&MTOTAL TOTALESCALATED 2027 Community DevelopmentBlock Grant $0 $0 $230,000 $0 $230,000 $236,440 2027 Measure M2 Local Fairshare $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $10,000 $10,280 Totals: $0 $0 $240,000 $0 $240,000 $246,720
Last Revised: 26-00 - In Progress Total Programmed: $240,000 TIP ID CP-12888 IMPLEMENTING AGENCY Aliso Viejo, City of Local Project Number: 25-LNIG-TSP-5012 Project Title
Additional Project IDs: La Paz Road Traffic Signal Synchronization Project (TSSP) Type of Work: Traffic Signals Project Description
Type of Work Description: Traffic Signals -Coordinate signals within project limits Aliso Viejo's portion of signal timing and equipment upgrades to La Paz Road Limits
La Paz Road from Olympia Rd/Felipe Rd to CrownValley Parkway Project Notes
City of Laguna Niguel is project lead. Fundingreflects Aliso Viejo share.
FISCALYEAR FUND TYPE ENGROWCON/IMPO&MTOTAL TOTALESCALATED 2027 Traffic Signal Sync Program(TSSP) $0 $0 $329,885 $0 $329,885 $339,122 2027 Measure M2 LocalFairshare $0 $0 $82,471 $0 $82,471 $84,780 Totals: $0 $0 $412,356 $0 $412,356 $423,902
Last Revised: 26-00 - In Progress Total Programmed: $412,356 6/4/26, 2:44 PM ocfundtracker.octa.net/CIP/report_project_listing https://ocfundtracker.octa.net/CIP/report_project_listing 4/5102 TIP ID CP-12887 IMPLEMENTING AGENCY Aliso Viejo, City of Local Project Number: Project Title
Additional Project IDs: Oso Parkway, Pacific Park, and Glenwood Drive Traffic Signal Synchronization Project (TSSP) Type of Work: Traffic Signals Project Description
Type of Work Description: Traffic Signals -Coordinate signals within project limits Aliso Viejo's portion of Signal Synchronization Project on Oso Parkway, Pacific Park, and GlenwoodDrive Limits
Oso Parkway, Pacific Park, and Glenwood Drivefrom Moulton Parkway to County of Orange Project Notes
Anticipated award of Project P application for OsoParkway, Pacific Park Drive, and Glenwood DriveCorridor. ALiso Viejo is the lead agency.
FISCALYEAR FUND TYPE ENGROWCON/IMP O&M TOTAL TOTALESCALATED 2028 Traffic Signal SyncProgram (TSSP) $0 $0 $719,302 $0 $719,302 $760,147 2028 Measure M2 LocalFairshare $0 $0 $2,877,208 $0 $2,877,208 $3,040,587 2029 Traffic Signal SyncProgram (TSSP) $0 $0 $0 $188,000 $188,000 $188,000 2029 Measure M2 LocalFairshare $0 $0 $0 $47,000 $47,000 $47,000 Totals: $0 $0 $3,596,510 $235,000 $3,831,510 $4,035,734 Last Revised: 26-00 - In Progress Total Programmed: $3,831,510 TIP ID CP-10015 IMPLEMENTING AGENCY Aliso Viejo, City of Local Project Number: 17-ALSO-ECP-3878 Project Title
Additional Project IDs: Stormwater Litter Control Project - Phase 5 Type of Work: Environmental Cleanup Project Description Type of Work Description: EnvironmentalCleanup - Catchment Retrofit Storm Water Pollution Proj-This project will include installation of Bio Clean high Capacity Filter insertson storm drain catch basins located on Public Streets. ECP funding approved in 2017. This is formaintenance of catch basin filters.
Limits
Various catch basins throughout the City
Project Notes
FISCAL YEAR FUND TYPE ENG ROW CON/IMP O&M TOTAL TOTAL ESCALATED 2027 Gas Tax $0 $0 $0 $23,000 $23,000 $23,000
2027 General Fund $0 $0 $0 $7,000 $7,000 $7,000
Totals: $0 $0 $0 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000
Last Revised: 26-00 - In Progress Total Programmed: $30,000 TIP ID CP-10016 IMPLEMENTING AGENCY Aliso Viejo, City of Local Project Number: Project Title
Additional Project IDs: Wood Canyon Wetland
Type of Work: Environmental Cleanup Project Description Type of Work Description: EnvironmentalCleanup - Constructed wetlands Maintenance of wetland to improve water quality in the Wood Canyon Wetland Limits
Wood Canyon Wetland
Project Notes
Project not funded through Project x. Includesroadway run-off treatment.
FISCAL YEAR FUND TYPE ENG ROW CON/IMP O&M TOTAL TOTAL ESCALATED 2027 General Fund $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000
2028 General Fund $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000
2029 General Fund $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000
2030 General Fund $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000
2031 General Fund $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000
2032 General Fund $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000
2033 General Fund $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000
Totals: $0 $0 $0 $70,000 $70,000 $70,000
Last Revised: 26-00 - In Progress Total Programmed: $70,000 6/4/26, 2:44 PM ocfundtracker.octa.net/CIP/report_project_listing https://ocfundtracker.octa.net/CIP/report_project_listing 5/5103
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-____
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALISO VIEJO
CONCERNING THE STATUS AND UPDATE OF THE PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE MEASURE M2 (M2) PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the local jurisdiction is required to meet eligibility requirements and submit eligibility verification packages to the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) in order to remain eligible to receive M2 funds; and WHEREAS, the local jurisdict ion is required to adopt and update a Pavement Management Plan (PMP), using the required format, regarding the status of road pavement conditions and implementation of the PMP on a biennial basis; and WHEREAS, the local jurisdiction is required to provide a plan that manages the preservation, rehabilitation, and maintenance of paved roads by analyzing pavement life cycles, assessing overall system performance costs, and determining alternative strategies and costs necessary to improve paved roads.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council for the City of Aliso Viejo does hereby inform OCTA that:
a) The PMP is in conformance with the PMP Submittal Template provided in the Countywide Pavement Management Plan Guidelines. b) The City hereby adopts a PMP and has provided an updated PMP report, using the required format, to OCTA.
c) The Public Works Director or City Engineer is authorized to sign the PMP certification form.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 17th day of June, 2026.
________________________
Max Duncan
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
________________________ ________________________
Scott C. Smith Maria Kendig
City Attorney City Clerk
104
City of Aliso Viejo
Pavement
Management Plan
Prepared by: GMU Pavement Engineering
Submitted to OCTA: 5-22-2026
105
Pavement Management Plan Local Jurisdiction Submittal
Page | 1
Agency Submittal Table of Contents
I. Pavement Management Plan Certification ..................................................................................................... 2 II. Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................................... 3 III. Background ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 IV. Current Pavement Conditions (PCI) ................................................................................................................ 7 V. Projected Pavement Conditions (PCI) ............................................................................................................. 7 VI. Alternative Funding Levels .............................................................................................................................. 8 Maintain Existing Average Network PCI .......................................................................................................... 8 Improve Average Network PCI ......................................................................................................................... 8 VII. Current and Projected Backlog by Year of Pavement Maintenance Needs ................................................... 9 VIII. Centerline Mileage .......................................................................................................................................... 9 IX. Percentage of Network in Each of Five Condition Categories Based on Centerline Miles ........................... 10 X. Reduction in Local Match .............................................................................................................................. 11 XI. Appendix A – Seven-Year Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Plan Based on Current or Expected Funding Level and Maintenance of Current System PCIs ............................................................................. 12 XII. Appendix B – Complete Listing of Current Street Conditions ....................................................................... 13 XIII. Appendix C – GIS Digital Data ....................................................................................................................... 14 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 14 Structure of GIS Data ..................................................................................................................................... 14 XIV. Appendix D – Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan ................................................................................. 16 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 16 Objectives ...................................................................................................................................................... 16 Structure of QA/QC Plan ................................................................................................................................ 16 Condition Survey Procedures ......................................................................................................................... 17 Accuracy Required for Data Collection .......................................................................................................... 18 Random and Systematic Re-Inspections ........................................................................................................ 18 PCI Comparison with Past Surveys ................................................................................................................. 19 Inspector’s Qualifications and Experience ..................................................................................................... 20 Safety Procedures .......................................................................................................................................... 21 XV. Appendix E – Pavement Management Data Files ......................................................................................... 22 XVI. Appendix F – GIS Maps – Current Conditions (Optional) .............................................................................. 22
106
Pavement Management Plan Local Jurisdiction Submittal
Page | 2
I. Pavement Management Plan Certification
The City/County of Aliso Viejo certifies that it has a Pavement Management Plan in conformance with the criteria stated in the Orange County Transportation Authority Ordinance No. 3. This ordinance requires that a Pavement Management Plan be in place and maintained to qualify for allocation of revenues generated from renewed Measure M2.
The plan was developed by GMU Pavement Engineering using PAVER™, a pavement management system, conforming to American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard D6433, and contains, at a minimum, the following elements:
• Inventory of MPAH and local routes reviewed and updated biennially. The last update of the inventory was completed in December 2025 for Arterial (MPAH) streets and December 2025 for local streets. • Assessment of pavement condition for all routes in the system, updated biennially. The last field review of pavement condition was completed on December, 2025.
• Percentage of all sections of pavement needing:
o Preventative Maintenance:73.9%
o Rehabilitation: 26.1%
o Reconstruction: 0.0%
• Budget needs for Preventative Maintenance, Rehabilitation, and/or Reconstruction of deficient sections of pavement for:
o Current biennial period $18.9 million
o Following biennial period $2.1 million
• Funds budgeted or available for Preventative Maintenance, Rehabilitation, and/or Reconstruction:
o Current biennial period $5.5 million
o Following biennial period $5.5 million
• Backlog by year of unfunded pavement rehabilitation, restoration, and reconstruction needs. • The Pavement Management Plan is consistent with countywide pavement condition assessment standards as described in the OCTA Countywide Pavement Management Plan Guidelines adopted by the OCTA Board of Directors.
*An electronic copy of the Pavement Management Plan (with Paver or StreetSaver compatible files) has been, or will be, submitted with the certification statement.
A copy of this certification is being provided to the Orange County Transportation Authority.
Submitted by:
Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text.
Name (Print) Jurisdiction
Click here to enter a date.
Signed Date
Click here to enter text.
Title (Public Works Director and/or City Engineer)
107
Pavement Management Plan Local Jurisdiction Submittal
Page | 3
II. Executive Summary
Maintaining a roadway network constitutes one of the most significant expenses for any city. To strategically and methodically maintain its roadway network, the City of Aliso Viejo conducts routine and biennial pavement management plan updates. Beyond monitoring its roadway network condition, this type of study is used to assist policy makers in making decisions on its pavement maintenance funding levels, as well as to comply with the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Measure M2 Program. This report summarizes the findings and conclusions from the city’s 2026 PMP Update.
The City is responsible for maintaining a total of approximately 72.2 centerline miles of streets, comprising approximately 45.1 centerline miles of local streets and approximately 27.1 miles of the Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH). To monitor and analyze this vast network of streets and pertinent information, the City utilizes PAVER pavement management software. Pavement distress surveys are performed in compliance with the American Society of Testing and Materials standard ASTM D6433, as required by the Orange County Transportation Authority.
Table 1 below summarizes the current City of Aliso Viejo network’s Pavement Condition Index (PCI) breakdown by functional classification.
Table 1. Network PCI Breakdown by Functional Classification Functional Classification Pavement Area (SF) Centerline Mileage Weighted Average PCI Functional Classification Pavement Area (SF) Centerline Mileage Weighted Average PCI MPAH 6,404,999 27.1 79
Local 9,338,630 45.1 82
Total 15,743,629 72.2 81
Total 46,459,479 204.8 82
The current citywide weighted average Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of the City of Aliso Viejo is 8 1. Overall, approximately 7 4% (by area) of the City’s road network is in the “Very Good” and “Good” condition, approximately 26% of the roads are in the “Fair” and “Poor” condition categories, and less than 1% are in the “Very Poor” Category.
The following three budget scenarios were evaluated as part of this study.
Scenario 1: Current Funding Level ($2.75 million per year) The City of Aliso Viejo’s current annual budget for roadway maintenance and rehabilitation projects is $2.75 million.
Under this funding level, by fiscal year 2032/33, the network PCI is expected to decrease from its current 81 to a PCI of 80. Approximately 79% of the network is projected to remain in the “ Very Good” or “Good” condition categories, while 19% is projected to fall within the “Fair” or “Poor” categories and 2% within “Very Poor”. Over the same period, deferred maintenance is projected to grow to $19.8 million.
Scenario 2: Maintain Current Network PCI at 81 ($3.0 million per year) To maintain the current network PCI at 81, the City would need to allocate approximately $3 million annually, totaling $21 million over the next seven-year analysis period.
108
Pavement Management Plan Local Jurisdiction Submittal
Page | 4
Under this scenario, by fiscal year 2032/33, approximately 81% of the network is projected to remain in the “Very Good” and “Good” condition categories, while 17% is projected to fall within the “Fair” and “Poor” categories, and 2% will be in the “Very Poo r”. The deferred maintenance will decrease to $18.0 million by 2032/33.
Scenario 3: Increase Network PCI ($4.2 million per year) To improve the network PCI by one point to 82, the City would need to allocate approximately $4.2 million annually, totaling $29.4 million over the seven-year analysis period.
Under this scenario, by fiscal year 2032/33, approximately 85% of the network is projected to be in the “Very Good” or “Good” condition categories, while 13% is projected to fall within the “Fair” or “Poor” categories and 2% within “Very Poor”. Deferred maintenance is projected to decrease to $7.2 million by fiscal year 2032/33.
Summary of Recommendations
Based on the analysis and results of the study, GMU recommends the following:
• At a minimum, maintain the current funding level of $2.75 million annually (Scenario 1). Although the network PCI will drop by 1 point and the amount of “deferred maintenance” will increase, this funding level is expected to maintain eligibility for the Measure M2 CTFP 10% local match reduction. • Preferably, increase the funding level to $3.0 million annually (Scenario 2). This funding level is predicted to allow the network PCI to remain the same and not degrade, as well as reduce the amount of deferred maintenance. As demonstrated by the difference between Scenarios 2 and 3, recovering a single point of network PCI requires approximately $1.2 million in additional annual funding (or approximately $8.4M over a 7 -year period) , underscoring the cost -effectiveness of preventing degradation rather than recovering from it.
• Prioritize preserving streets at higher PCI levels to minimize life-cycle costs. Streets maintained in good or very good condition require less frequent intervention and avoid the escalation of minor distress into costly rehabilitation or reconstruction needs.
• Continuously monitor construction costs for implementation into future pavement management plan updates.
• Routinely update the Maintenance and Rehabilitation (M&R) history of all the streets in the network. • When specific streets are identified for improvement, perform project-level studies, including pavement coring, laboratory testing, and structural evaluation, to develop site-specific design recommendations rather than directly implementing the conceptual treatments identified in this report. This PMP is developed for network-level planning and funding purposes and does not incorporate detailed site-specific information such as subgrade condition, in-place pavement layer thicknesses, or laboratory test results.
• Evaluate additional rehabilitation strategies that reuse in-place materials, such as Full-Depth Reclamation (FDR) and Cold-In-Place Recycling (CIR), which can reduce construction costs and extend pavement life while supporting sustainability goals.
• Continue updating the pavement management plan on the OCTA-required biennial cycle to maintain eligibility for Measure M2 funding.
109
Pavement Management Plan Local Jurisdiction Submittal
Page | 5
III. Background
Maintaining a citywide street network is a complex undertaking. It involves multiple layers of information that can have significant impacts on pavement performance and maintenance costs, such as:
• Funding: The funding level impacts the type of repair strategies that can be implemented, the design life of the selected strategy, and the number of streets that can be improved within a given budget cycle.
• Pavement age and work history: The City’s streets were constructed at different times and have received various maintenance and rehabilitation treatments over their service lives. These differences directly influence current and projected future condition. • Pavement inventory: A current inventory of streets defines the limits of the study and the City’s area of responsibility and enables more accurate budget scenario analysis. • Historical costs for various types of repairs: Recent pavement maintenance/rehabilitation costs are reviewed and updated to improve the accuracy of future cost projections. • Current pavement condition: Pavement condition is objectively rated through field surveys in accordance with ASTM D6433 - Standard Practice for Roads and Parking Lots Pavement Condition Index Surveys.
• Predicted pavement condition: Future pavement condition is projected under various funding scenarios to illustrate the relationship between investment level and network performance.
GMU identified, analyzed, and summarized the above information in this 2026 PMP Update. This report should be considered a decision-support tool for determining pavement maintenance and rehabilitation funding levels..
The most cost-effective method for roadway maintenance is to keep them in “good” or better condition. Just like doing oil changes for vehicles, proactive pavement maintenance (i.e., slurry sealing) will help minimize future repair costs. Eventually, after so many oil changes, more costly but still relatively inexpensive repairs will be due (i.e., rehabilitation or mill-and-overlays). The most expensive approach is to “do nothing” or defer maintenance substantially, such that complete replacement will be the only option left to restore the pavement condition.
The following is a general description of the conceptual pavement repair strategies.
• Maintenance (Good - Very Good Condition): Pavements in “good” or “very good” condition category are typically identified for maintenance, which generally consists of crack repairs and slurry seal. For optimal performance, slurry seals are applied on streets in good or very good condition to help preserve the condition of the roadway. These treatments help seal minor surface cracks and serve as a protective surface membrane, acting as “sunblock” for the roadway surface. When properly applied to a suitable surface, slurry seals typically last approximately 5 to 7 years.
Pavement maintenance treatments applied on streets that are in unsuitable condition (worse than “good”) will result in reduced treatment performance and diminished protection of the underlying structural pavement section.
• Rehabilitation (Fair Condition): As the pavement ages and deteriorates to a “fair” condition, maintenance treatments are no longer sufficient. At this stage, the pavement will exhibit signs of significant aging-related distress and some load-related distress, such as alligator cracking.
Streets in this condition are typically identified for rehabilitation, which generally consists of performing a 2-inch or 3 -inch thick mill- and-overlay with a reflective cracking limiting system to reduce crack 110
Pavement Management Plan Local Jurisdiction Submittal
Page | 6
propagation potential. Localized areas of repair (i.e., patches) may also be required to address localized areas of load-related distress. Mill-and-overlays are typically performed once every 15 to 20 years.
• Reconstruction (Poor / Very Poor Condition): If streets deteriorate more rapidly than expected, or if maintenance/rehabilitation is deferred, they can deteriorate to a “poor” or worse condition category.
Streets in this condition are typically identified for reconstruction, which generally includes performing full-depth reclamation or remove-and-replace reconstruction.
The following graph illustrates this concept further.
Figure 1. Effect of Applying Maintenance on the Service Life of the Pavement.
The x- axis represents the age of the roadway, and the y -axis represents pavement condition (Pavement Condition Index). Following a proactive maintenance schedule (“timely pavement maintenance curve”) will help reduce pavement costs by several folds relativ e to the “reactive maintenance” or “pavement reconstruction” curves.
~$0.55 / square feet
Timely Pavement Maintenance
~$5 to $8 / square feet
Reactive Pavement Maintenance
~$11 to $18 / square feet
Complete Replacement
111
Pavement Management Plan Local Jurisdiction Submittal
Page | 7
IV. Current Pavement Conditions (PCI)
Current Network PCI Current MPAH PCI Current Local PCI
81 79 82
V. Projected Pavement Conditions (PCI)
Projected PCI by year under existing or expected funding levels for next seven fiscal years (“Today” is before June 30, 2026).
Fiscal Year Current Funding Entire Network
PCI MPAH Local
Today $1.4 million 81 79 82
2026-27 $2.75 million 81 77 83
2027-28 $2.75 million 81 77 83
2028-29 $2.75 million 81 78 83
2029-30 $2.75 million 82 77 84
2030-31 $2.75 million 81 77 83
2031-32 $2.75 million 80 76 83
2032-33 $2.75 million 80 75 83
The Local network is projected to benefit from concentrated investment in the near term; however, MPAH street conditions are expected to decline under current funding, driving the overall network PCI downward. 112
Pavement Management Plan Local Jurisdiction Submittal
Page | 8
VI. Alternative Funding Levels
Maintain Existing Average Network PCI
Fiscal Year Funding Level Entire Network
PCI MPAH Local
Today $1.4 million 81 79 82
2026-27 $3.0 million 81 77 83
2027-28 $3.0 million 81 78 83
2028-29 $3.0 million 82 78 84
2029-30 $3.0 million 82 77 85
2030-31 $3.0 million 82 78 84
2031-32 $3.0 million 81 76 83
2032-33 $3.0 million 81 76 83
Improve Average Network PCI
Fiscal Year Funding Level Entire Network
PCI MPAH Local
Today $1.4 million 81 79 82
2026-27 $4.2 million 81 78 83
2027-28 $4.2 million 82 80 83
2028-29 $4.2 million 83 80 85
2029-30 $4.2 million 83 81 85
2030-31 $4.2 million 83 82 84
2031-32 $4.2 million 83 81 84
2032-33 $4.2 million 83 82 83
113
Pavement Management Plan Local Jurisdiction Submittal
Page | 9
VII. Current and Projected Backlog by Year of Pavement Maintenance Needs
Fiscal Year Current Funding
Backlog Maintain PCI Backlog Increase PCI Backlog
Current $17.4 million $17.4 million $17.4 million
2026-27 $14.7 million $15.0 million $13.8 million
2027-28 $14.8 million $14.9 million $12.3 million
2028-29 $14.0 million $13.7 million $9.7 million
2029-30 $14.1 million $13.5 million $7.8 million
2030-31 $14.2 million $13.2 million $5.7 million
2031-32 $17.9 million $16.6 million $7.5 million
2032-33 $19.8 million $18.0 million $7.2 million
Under current funding, the backlog is projected to grow by $ 2.4 million; investing an additional $ 1.45 million annually (Scenario 3) would instead reduce the backlog by $10.2 million.
VIII. Centerline Mileage
Entire Pavement Network MPAH Local Roads
72.2 27.1 45.1
114
Pavement Management Plan Local Jurisdiction Submittal
Page | 10
IX. Percentage of Network in Each of Five Condition Categories Based on Centerline Miles
Condition
Category PCI Range Network
Percent
Area of
Total
Pavement
Area of
Pavement
(SF)
Percent
Centerline
Mileage of
Network
Centerline
Mileage of
Network
Very Good 86-100
MPAH 16.0% 2,523,854
40.1%
10.2 Local 25.2% 3,959,367 18.7
Good 75-85
MPAH 7.4% 1,161,136
33.8%
5.1 Local 25.0% 3,938,569 19.3
Fair 60-74
MPAH 13.3% 2,084,145
19.3%
9.0 Local 6.3% 993,544 5.0
Poor 41-59
MPAH 4.0% 635,864
6.8%
2.8 Local 2.8% 440,830 2.1
Very Poor 0-40
MPAH 0.0% 0
0.0%
0 Local 0.0% 6,320 0
115
Pavement Management Plan Local Jurisdiction Submittal
Page | 11
X. Reduction in Local Match
A local agency match reduction of 10% of the eligible cost for Project O submitted for consideration of funding through the Comprehensive Transportation Funding Programs (CTFP) call for projects is available if the local agency either:
a. Shows measurable improvement of paved road conditions during the previous reporting period defined as an overall weighted (by area) average system improvement of one Pavement Condition Index (PCI) point with no reduction in the overall weighted (by area) a verage PCI in the Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) or local street categories;
or
b. Have road pavement conditions during the previous reporting period, within the highest 20% of the scale for road pavement conditions in conformance with OCTA Ordinance No. 3, defined as a PCI of 75 or higher, otherwise defined as in “good condition”.
The City of Aliso Viejo meets criteria (b) with a current weighted average PCI of 81, therefore remains eligible for M2 funding and the CTFP 10% local match reduction.
116
Pavement Management Plan Local Jurisdiction Submittal
Page | 12
XI. Appendix A – Seven-Year Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Plan Based on Current or Expected Funding Level and Maintenance of Current System PCIs
The seven-year plan for road maintenance and rehabilitation should be based on current and projected budget.
Street sections selected for treatment should be identified here. Specific data to be submitted should follow the format below:
MPAH
Limits of Work
Street Name From To Length of
Segment
Width of
Segment
Pavement
Area
Type of
Treatment
Cost of
Treatment
Year of
Treatment
LOCAL
Limits of Work
Street Name From To Length of
Segment
Width of
Segment
Pavement
Area
Type of
Treatment
Cost of
Treatment
Year of
Treatment
Please attach the seven-year road maintenance and rehabilitation plan, following the above template, after this sheet. The plan should be labeled Appendix A.
117
From To
Alicia Parkway Pacific Park Morning Ridge 1,153 41 47,273 Type II Slurry Seal $26,000 2026/27 Alicia Parkway Morning Ridge 73 Overpass 514 41 21,074 Type II Slurry Seal $11,591 2026/27 Alicia Parkway 73 Overpass Holly Oak 520 41 21,320 Type II Slurry Seal $11,726 2026/27 Alicia Parkway Holly Oak North City Limits 1,396 41 57,236 Type II Slurry Seal $31,480 2026/27 Alicia Parkway Holly Oak 73 Overpass 523 42 21,966 Type II Slurry Seal $12,081 2026/27 Alicia Parkway Morning Ridge Pacific Park Dr 1,154 42 48,468 Type II Slurry Seal $26,658 2026/27 Aliso Creek Rd Pacific Park Dr Journey 1,397 48 67,056 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $36,881 2026/27 Aliso Creek Rd Journey Aliso Viejo Pkwy 1,102 48 52,896 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $29,093 2026/27 Aliso Creek Rd Wood Canyon Dr Pursuit 979 48 45,342 Type II Slurry Seal $24,938 2026/27 Aliso Creek Rd Autumnglen Enterprise 1,016 48 47,318 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $26,025 2026/27 Aliso Creek Rd Windsong 73 Toll Overpass 1,338 51 66,688 Type II Slurry Seal $36,679 2026/27 Aliso Viejo Parkway Cedarbrook Briarglen 1,540 49 73,910 Type II Slurry Seal $40,651 2026/27 Aliso Viejo Parkway Briarglen Moulton Pkwy 603 49 31,397 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $17,268 2026/27 Glenwood Dr Argonaut Aliso Creek Rd 1,072 42 44,954 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $24,725 2026/27 La Paz Road Pacific Park Drive North City Limits 2,105 33 69,465 Type II Slurry Seal $38,206 2026/27 La Paz Road North City Limits Pacific Park Dr 2,117 33 69,861 Type II Slurry Seal $38,424 2026/27 Pacific Park Dr Chase Canyon Vistas 1,320 42 53,940 Type II Slurry Seal $29,667 2026/27 Pacific Park Dr Canyon Vistas Coronado Cay 805 40 30,600 Type II Slurry Seal $16,830 2026/27 Pacific Park Dr Coronado Cay Enterprise 1,251 41 50,041 Type II Slurry Seal $27,523 2026/27 Pacific Park Dr Enterprise 73 Toll Overpass 477 41 20,407 Type II Slurry Seal $11,224 2026/27 Pacific Park Dr 73 Toll Overpass Enterprise 475 41 19,475 Type II Slurry Seal $10,711 2026/27 Pacific Park Dr Enterprise Coronado Cay 1,248 41 51,098 Type II Slurry Seal $28,104 2026/27 Pacific Park Dr Coronado Cay Canyon Vistas 807 41 33,087 Type II Slurry Seal $18,198 2026/27 Pacific Park Dr Aliso Creek Rd Bridge w/s 1,436 48 68,928 Type II Slurry Seal $37,911 2026/27 Pacific Park Dr Bridge w/s Aliso Creek Rd 1,436 96 68,928 Type II Slurry Seal $37,911 2026/27 Pacific Park Dr Aliso Creek Rd City Lights Dr 938 42 38,096 Type II Slurry Seal $20,953 2026/27 Alicia Parkway North City Limits Holly Oak 1,393 42 58,506 Type II Slurry Seal $33,144 2027/28 Aliso Creek Rd Aliso Viejo Pkwy Columbia 1,990 40 78,250 Mill and Overlay $514,015 2027/28 Aliso Creek Rd Glenwood Dr Columbia 1,784 41 71,694 Mill and Overlay + Localized Repairs $526,149 2027/28 Aliso Creek Rd Aliso Viejo Pkwy Liberty 1,767 48 83,266 Type II Slurry Seal $47,171 2027/28 Aliso Creek Rd Liberty Pursuit 942 48 43,666 Type II Slurry Seal $24,737 2027/28 Aliso Creek Rd Pursuit Wood Canyon Dr 985 48 47,280 Type II Slurry Seal $26,784 2027/28 Aliso Creek Rd Wood Canyon Dr City Limits (Bridge) 740 48 35,520 Type II Slurry Seal $20,122 2027/28 Aliso Creek Rd City Limits (Bridge) Wood Canyon Dr 750 48 35,830 Type II Slurry Seal $20,298 2027/28 Aliso Creek Rd Pursuit Liberty 935 48 43,430 Type II Slurry Seal $24,603 2027/28 Aliso Creek Rd Liberty Aliso Viejo Pkwy 1,767 48 83,066 Type II Slurry Seal $47,057 2027/28 Aliso Creek Rd Aliso Viejo Pkwy Windsong 1,044 41 41,254 Type II Slurry Seal $23,371 2027/28 Aliso Viejo Parkway Enterprise Vantis Dr 1,213 48 56,674 Mill and Overlay + Localized Repairs $386,003 2027/28 Aliso Viejo Parkway Moulton Pkwy Briarglen 603 49 29,547 Type II Slurry Seal $16,739 2027/28 Pavement Area
(SF)Street Name
Appendix A
Seven Year Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Plan Based on Expected Funding Level Width of
Segment
Length of
Segment
Limits of Work Year of
TreatmentCost of TreatmentConceptual Treatment Type
MPAH
Appendix A ‐ MPAH
1 of 3 118
From To
Pavement Area
(SF)Street Name
Appendix A
Seven Year Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Plan Based on Expected Funding Level Width of
Segment
Length of
Segment
Limits of Work Year of
TreatmentCost of TreatmentConceptual Treatment Type
MPAH
Aliso Creek Rd Autumnglen Pacific Park Dr 1,065 48 49,670 Mill and Overlay $311,298 2028/29 Aliso Creek Rd Westwing Hummingbird Ln 2,240 41 90,350 Mill and Overlay $515,450 2028/29 Aliso Viejo Parkway Briarglen Cedarbrook 1,540 49 75,360 Type II Slurry Seal $43,973 2028/29 Pacific Park Dr Bridge e/s Alicia Pkwy 1,197 48 56,256 Mill and Overlay $274,241 2028/29 Pacific Park Dr Aliso Niguel City Limits 1,656 42 67,742 Mill and Overlay $382,698 2028/29 Pacific Park Dr Alicia Pkwy Bridge e/s 1,167 48 56,016 Mill and Overlay + Localized Repairs $417,926 2028/29 Wood Canyon Dr Westridge Dr Pacific Park Dr 1,003 70 69,360 Type II Slurry Seal $40,472 2028/29 Alicia Parkway 73 Overpass Morning Ridge 513 42 21,546 Type II Slurry Seal $12,949 2029/30 Aliso Creek Rd Hummingbird Ln El Toro Rd 656 41 26,846 Mill and Overlay + Localized Repairs $252,164 2029/30 Aliso Creek Rd Columbia Aliso Viejo Pkwy 1,979 41 79,389 Mill and Overlay + Localized Repairs $677,350 2029/30 Pacific Park Dr Aliso Viejo Pkwy City Lights Dr 1,288 48 60,524 Type II Slurry Seal $36,375 2029/30 Aliso Viejo Parkway Vantis Dr Grand 1,005 48 48,240 Mill and Overlay + Localized Repairs $519,913 2030/31 Aliso Viejo Parkway Pacific Park Dr Liberty 1,824 40 71,336 Mill and Overlay + Localized Repairs $643,920 2030/31 Aliso Viejo Parkway Pacific Park Dr 1134 n/o Pacific Park Dr 1,134 51 56,036 Mill and Overlay + Localized Repairs $505,813 2030/31 Aliso Viejo Parkway Grand Vantis Dr 1,002 48 46,546 Mill and Overlay + Localized Repairs $429,999 2030/31 Pacific Park Dr Heather Ridge Alicia Pkwy 992 75 41,664 Mill and Overlay + Localized Repairs $454,853 2030/31 Alicia Parkway Pacific Park Morning Ridge 1,153 41 47,273 Type II Slurry Seal $30,142 2031/32 Alicia Parkway Morning Ridge 73 Overpass 514 41 21,074 Type II Slurry Seal $13,437 2031/32 Alicia Parkway 73 Overpass Holly Oak 520 41 21,320 Type II Slurry Seal $13,594 2031/32 Alicia Parkway Holly Oak North City Limits 1,396 41 57,236 Type II Slurry Seal $36,494 2031/32 Alicia Parkway Holly Oak 73 Overpass 523 42 21,966 Type II Slurry Seal $14,006 2031/32 Alicia Parkway Morning Ridge Pacific Park Dr 1,154 42 48,468 Type II Slurry Seal $30,903 2031/32 Aliso Creek Rd Pacific Park Dr Journey 1,397 48 67,056 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $42,755 2031/32 Aliso Creek Rd Wood Canyon Dr Pursuit 979 48 45,342 Type II Slurry Seal $28,910 2031/32 Aliso Creek Rd Autumnglen Enterprise 1,016 48 47,318 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $30,170 2031/32 Aliso Creek Rd Windsong 73 Toll Overpass 1,338 51 66,688 Type II Slurry Seal $42,521 2031/32 Aliso Viejo Parkway Cedarbrook Briarglen 1,540 49 73,910 Type II Slurry Seal $47,125 2031/32 La Paz Road Pacific Park Drive North City Limits 2,105 33 69,465 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $44,291 2031/32 La Paz Road North City Limits Pacific Park Dr 2,117 33 69,861 Type II Slurry Seal $44,544 2031/32 Pacific Park Dr Chase Canyon Vistas 1,320 42 53,940 Type II Slurry Seal $34,392 2031/32 Pacific Park Dr Canyon Vistas Coronado Cay 805 40 30,600 Type II Slurry Seal $19,511 2031/32 Pacific Park Dr Coronado Cay Enterprise 1,251 41 50,041 Type II Slurry Seal $31,906 2031/32 Pacific Park Dr Enterprise 73 Toll Overpass 477 41 20,407 Type II Slurry Seal $13,012 2031/32 Pacific Park Dr 73 Toll Overpass Enterprise 475 41 19,475 Type II Slurry Seal $12,417 2031/32 Pacific Park Dr Enterprise Coronado Cay 1,248 41 51,098 Type II Slurry Seal $32,580 2031/32 Pacific Park Dr Coronado Cay Canyon Vistas 807 41 33,087 Type II Slurry Seal $21,096 2031/32 Pacific Park Dr Aliso Creek Rd Bridge w/s 1,436 48 68,928 Type II Slurry Seal $43,949 2031/32 Pacific Park Dr Bridge w/s Aliso Creek Rd 1,436 96 68,928 Type II Slurry Seal $43,949 2031/32 Pacific Park Dr Aliso Creek Rd City Lights Dr 938 42 38,096 Type II Slurry Seal $24,290 2031/32 Appendix A ‐ MPAH
2 of 3 119
From To
Pavement Area
(SF)Street Name
Appendix A
Seven Year Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Plan Based on Expected Funding Level Width of
Segment
Length of
Segment
Limits of Work Year of
TreatmentCost of TreatmentConceptual Treatment Type
MPAH
Alicia Parkway North City Limits Holly Oak 1,393 42 58,506 Type II Slurry Seal $38,423 2032/33 Aliso Creek Rd Aliso Viejo Pkwy Liberty 1,767 48 83,266 Type II Slurry Seal $54,684 2032/33 Aliso Creek Rd Liberty Pursuit 942 48 43,666 Type II Slurry Seal $28,677 2032/33 Aliso Creek Rd Pursuit Wood Canyon Dr 985 48 47,280 Type II Slurry Seal $31,050 2032/33 Aliso Creek Rd Wood Canyon Dr City Limits (Bridge) 740 48 35,520 Type II Slurry Seal $23,327 2032/33 Aliso Creek Rd City Limits (Bridge) Wood Canyon Dr 750 48 35,830 Type II Slurry Seal $23,531 2032/33 Aliso Creek Rd Pursuit Liberty 935 48 43,430 Type II Slurry Seal $28,522 2032/33 Aliso Creek Rd Liberty Aliso Viejo Pkwy 1,767 48 83,066 Type II Slurry Seal $54,552 2032/33 Aliso Creek Rd 73 Toll Overpass Windsong 1,346 51 68,646 Type II Slurry Seal $45,082 2032/33 Aliso Creek Rd Windsong Aliso Viejo Pkwy 1,051 40 40,790 Type II Slurry Seal $26,788 2032/33 Aliso Creek Rd Aliso Viejo Pkwy Windsong 1,044 41 41,254 Type II Slurry Seal $27,093 2032/33 Aliso Viejo Parkway Moulton Pkwy Briarglen 603 49 29,547 Type II Slurry Seal $19,405 2032/33 Pacific Park Dr City Limits Aliso Niguel 1,656 42 69,552 Mill and Overlay + Localized Repairs $629,845 2032/33 Wood Canyon Dr Calypso St Oak View Dr 1,642 61 98,612 Type II Slurry Seal $64,762 2032/33 Appendix A ‐ MPAH
3 of 3 120
From To
Gala Ct Richmont Wy Dead End 264 36 10,754. Type II Slurry Seal $403 2026/27 Blue Heron Ln San Bittern Ln Dead End 567 36 21,612. Mill and Overlay + Localized Repairs $61,811 2026/27 Condor Ln Sanderling Ln Hummingbird Ln 126 36 4,536. Mill and Overlay + Localized Repairs $11,340 2026/27 Da Vinci Glenwood Dr Cedarbrook 1,943 43 83,549. Type II Slurry Seal $45,952 2026/27 Cedarbrook Aliso Viejo Pkwy Starcrest 1,295 40 51,800. Type II Slurry Seal $28,490 2026/27 Cedarbrook Da Vinci Glenwood Dr 1,071 43 46,703. Type II Slurry Seal $25,687 2026/27 Eastwing Heatherwood Aliso Creek 1,229 40 49,160. Type II Slurry Seal $27,038 2026/27 Eastwing Heatherwood Ramblewood 1,941 40 77,640. Type II Slurry Seal $42,702 2026/27 Grand Ave Aliso Viejo Pkwy Wood Canyon Dr 909 45 39,405. Type II Slurry Seal $21,673 2026/27 Enterprise Pacific Park Dr Antares 418 44 18,392. Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $10,116 2026/27 Canyon Vistas Pacific Park Wood Vista Way 953 40 37,970. Type II Slurry Seal $20,884 2026/27 Canyon Vistas Wood Vista Way Silkwood 1,569 40 62,760. Type II Slurry Seal $34,518 2026/27 Westwing Aliso Creek Ramblewood 2,548 40 101,770. Type II Slurry Seal $55,974 2026/27 Westwing Calle Corta Aliso Creek 1,784 40 71,360. Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $39,248 2026/27 Canyon Wren Ln Crane St El Toro Rd 1,208 40 48,230. Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $26,527 2026/27 Calle Corta Westwing El Toro Rd 1,364 40 54,470. Type II Slurry Seal $29,959 2026/27 Egret Ln Prarie Falcon Seagull Ln 2,039 40 81,500. Type II Slurry Seal $44,825 2026/27 Saddleridge Highpoint Dead End 1,097 36 40,742. Type II Slurry Seal $22,408 2026/27 Seagull Ln Surfbird Ln Canyon Wren Ln 933 40 37,320. Type II Slurry Seal $20,526 2026/27 Birchmont Cedarbrook Eastwind 804 40 32,160. Type II Slurry Seal $17,688 2026/27 Eastwind Amber Briarglen 1,571 30 47,130. Type II Slurry Seal $25,922 2026/27 Briarglen Eastwind Dahlia 1,077 32 34,304. Type II Slurry Seal $18,867 2026/27 Briarglen Dahlia Aliso Viejo Pkwy 1,001 32 32,032. Type II Slurry Seal $17,618 2026/27 Briarglen Briarglen Dead End 106 60 7,460. Type II Slurry Seal $4,103 2026/27 Coralwind Eastwind Dead End 615 36 23,390. Type II Slurry Seal $12,865 2026/27 Windflower Eastwind Dead End 792 36 29,762. Type II Slurry Seal $16,369 2026/27 Lynoak Briarglen Dead End 264 36 10,754 Type II Slurry Seal $5,915 2026/27 Solitaire Ln Seagull Ln Dead End 1,040 36 38,690 Type II Slurry Seal $21,280 2026/27 Swan Ln Surfbird Ln Dead End 370 36 14,510 Type II Slurry Seal $7,981 2026/27 Merlin Ave Surfbird Ln Moorhen Ln 1,672 34 56,788 Type II Slurry Seal $31,234 2026/27 Surfbird Ln Spoonbill Dr Seagull Ln 1,211 37 45,657 Type II Slurry Seal $25,112 2026/27 Deerhurst Wolverine Foxborough 1,808 40 72,320 Type II Slurry Seal $39,776 2026/27 Wolverine Way Sandcastle CDS 1,064 36 38,304 Type II Slurry Seal $21,067 2026/27 Wigeon Ln Cuervo Dr Pinyon Jay 264 39 10,296 Type II Slurry Seal $5,663 2026/27 Spoonbill Dr Surfbird Ln Lakespur Dr 528 40 21,120 Type II Slurry Seal $11,616 2026/27 Larkspur Dr Spoonbill Dr Skylark Dr 913 40 36,430 Type II Slurry Seal $20,037 2026/27 Skylark Dr Larkspur Dr Eastwing 1,166 40 46,520 Type II Slurry Seal $25,586 2026/27 Raven Ln Skylark Dr Dead End 1,490 36 54,800 Type II Slurry Seal $30,140 2026/27 Woodstork Ln Skylark Dr Bluejay Dr 264 36 9,464 Type II Slurry Seal $5,205 2026/27 Wood Canyon Dr Sanborn Grand 703 43 30,179 Type II Slurry Seal $16,599 2026/27 Appendix A
Seven Year Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Plan Based on Expected Funding Level LOCAL
Street Name Limits of Work Length of
Segment
Width of
Segment
Pavement Area
(SF) Conceptual Treatment Type Cost of
Treatment
Year of
Treatment
Appendix A ‐ Local Streets
1 of 10 121
From To
Appendix A
Seven Year Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Plan Based on Expected Funding Level LOCAL
Street Name Limits of Work Length of
Segment
Width of
Segment
Pavement Area
(SF) Conceptual Treatment Type Cost of
Treatment
Year of
Treatment
Wood Canyon Dr Grand Alastair 1,354 43 58,222 Type II Slurry Seal $32,022 2026/27 Chase Thisledown Paradise Bay 1,132 43 48,676 Type II Slurry Seal $26,772 2026/27 Sanborn Chase Aurora 1,189 36 42,804 Type II Slurry Seal $23,542 2026/27 Sanborn Aurora Wood Canyon Dr 999 36 35,824 Type II Slurry Seal $19,703 2026/27 Parisville Grand Dead End 398 36 15,578 Type II Slurry Seal $8,568 2026/27 Pierremont Parisville Dead end 910 36 33,950 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $18,673 2026/27 Nantais Pierremont Dead End 264 36 10,754 Type II Slurry Seal $5,915 2026/27 Caledon Ct Richmont Wy Dead End 321 36 12,806 Type II Slurry Seal $7,043 2026/27 Richmont Wy Caledon Ct Kara Ct 534 36 19,224 Type II Slurry Seal $10,573 2026/27 Kara Ct Richmont Wy Dead End 264 36 10,754 Type II Slurry Seal $5,915 2026/27 Plateau North End Picket Ln 1,342 36 49,562 Type II Slurry Seal $27,259 2026/27 Plateau Picket Ln South End 439 36 17,154 Type II Slurry Seal $9,435 2026/27 Ponderosa St Sanborn Northern Pine 131 40 5,160 Type II Slurry Seal $2,838 2026/27 Oak Ridge Cir Northern Pine Dead End 183 36 7,838 Type II Slurry Seal $4,311 2026/27 Boulder Cir Northern Pine Dead End 149 36 6,614 Type II Slurry Seal $3,638 2026/27 Moorhen Ln Westwing Mallard Dr 392 36 14,112 Type II Slurry Seal $7,762 2026/27 Cayman Brac Brittany Bay Laguna Madre 643 36 23,148 Type II Slurry Seal $12,732 2026/27 Laguna Madre Cayman Brac Cape Coral 284 36 10,224 Type II Slurry Seal $5,623 2026/27 Cape Coral Laguna Madre Brittany Bay 712 36 25,632 Type II Slurry Seal $14,098 2026/27 Palm Harbor Cayman Brac Cape Coral 292 36 10,512 Type II Slurry Seal $5,782 2026/27 Pinyon Jay Wigeon Ln Bob White 206 39 8,034 Type II Slurry Seal $4,419 2026/27 Peacock Ct Moorhen Ln Dead end 264 36 10,754 Type II Slurry Seal $5,915 2026/27 Silkwood Canyon Vistas Dead End 1,206 36 44,666 Type II Slurry Seal $24,567 2026/27 Bottlebrush Silkwood Hollyleaf 480 36 17,280 Type II Slurry Seal $9,504 2026/27 Hollyleaf Hopseed Bottlebrush 984 36 35,424 Type II Slurry Seal $19,483 2026/27 Hollyleaf Bottlebrush Dead End 1,111 36 40,786 Type II Slurry Seal $22,432 2026/27 Coffeeberry Hollyleaf Dead End 422 36 16,442 Type II Slurry Seal $9,043 2026/27 Sugar Gum Hollyleaf Dead End 335 36 13,310 Type II Slurry Seal $7,321 2026/27 Hopseed Hollyleaf Wood Vista 2,048 40 81,920 Type II Slurry Seal $45,056 2026/27 Golden Rain Hopseed Dead End 770 36 28,910 Type II Slurry Seal $15,901 2026/27 Lantana Hopseed Dead End 792 36 29,762 Type II Slurry Seal $16,369 2026/27 Stone Pine Hopseed Dead End 792 36 29,762 Type II Slurry Seal $16,369 2026/27 Wood Vista Wy Hopseed Canyon Vista 1,136 40 45,440 Type II Slurry Seal $24,992 2026/27 Coastal Oak Canyon Vistas Peppertree 1,848 36 66,408 Type II Slurry Seal $36,525 2026/27 Sprucewood Canyon Vistas Peppertree 2,423 36 87,108 Type II Slurry Seal $47,910 2026/27 Timberland Peppertree Dead End 2,213 36 84,228 Type II Slurry Seal $46,326 2026/27 Sagebrush Timberland Canyon Vistas 312 40 12,400 Type II Slurry Seal $6,820 2026/27 Elderwood Sagebrush Dead End 1,584 36 58,274 Type II Slurry Seal $32,051 2026/27 Peppertree Sprucewood End 1,046 40 42,690 Type II Slurry Seal $23,480 2026/27 Rosy Finch Ln Westwing Dead End 964 36 35,894 Type II Slurry Seal $19,742 2026/27 Appendix A ‐ Local Streets
2 of 10 122
From To
Appendix A
Seven Year Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Plan Based on Expected Funding Level LOCAL
Street Name Limits of Work Length of
Segment
Width of
Segment
Pavement Area
(SF) Conceptual Treatment Type Cost of
Treatment
Year of
Treatment
Pheasant Ln Westwing Dead End 950 36 35,450 Type II Slurry Seal $19,498 2026/27 King Eider Ln Calle Corta Dead End 970 36 36,170 Type II Slurry Seal $19,894 2026/27 Bob White Ln Pinyon Jay Cuervo Dr 264 39 10,276 Type II Slurry Seal $5,652 2026/27 Tanager Ln El Toro Rd Dead End 452 36 17,122 Type II Slurry Seal $9,417 2026/27 Northwinds Westwing Dead End 698 35 25,680 Type II Slurry Seal $14,124 2026/27 Tanglewood Westwing Dead End 1,050 36 38,990 Type II Slurry Seal $21,445 2026/27 Bay Laurel Westwing Coppercrest 514 40 20,560 Type II Slurry Seal $11,308 2026/27 Copper Crest End End 921 36 35,656 Type II Slurry Seal $19,611 2026/27 Nutcracker Ln Cuervo Dr Dead End 421 39 17,579 Type II Slurry Seal $9,669 2026/27 Hazelbranch Baylaurel Dead End 196 36 8,306 Type II Slurry Seal $4,568 2026/27 Stonebrook Westwing Dead End 528 36 20,258 Type II Slurry Seal $11,142 2026/27 Sandbridge Highpoint Heatherwood 1,169 40 46,760 Type II Slurry Seal $25,718 2026/27 Pathfinder Saddleridge Eaglepoint 264 36 9,504 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $5,227 2026/27 Heatherwood Eastwing Dead End 931 36 34,706 Type II Slurry Seal $19,088 2026/27 Cardinal Ave Canyon Wren Ln Bluebird ln 918 34 31,122 Type II Slurry Seal $17,117 2026/27 Ridgecrest Oakleigh Shorecliff 1,584 30 47,520 Type II Slurry Seal $26,136 2026/27 Shorecliff Ridgecrest Dead End 1,848 30 56,690 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $31,180 2026/27 Ramblewood Shorecliff Westwing 574 34 19,456 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $10,701 2026/27 Timberbluff Ramblewood Dead End 267 36 10,862 Type II Slurry Seal $5,974 2026/27 Flintstone Eastwing Dead End 1,320 30 40,850 Type II Slurry Seal $22,468 2026/27 Bluebird Ln Cardinal Ave Dead End 921 34 32,564 Type II Slurry Seal $17,910 2026/27 Crane St Canyon Wren Ln Prarie Falcon 101 40 4,010 Type II Slurry Seal $2,206 2026/27 Bells Vireo Ln Hummingbird Ln El Toro Road 488 40 19,470 Type II Slurry Seal $10,709 2026/27 Diamond Gate Lindengrove Dead End 1,481 36 54,706 Type II Slurry Seal $30,089 2026/27 Crystal Glen Diamondgate Dead End 332 36 13,202 Type II Slurry Seal $7,261 2026/27 Goldenfield Diamondgate Dead End 114 36 5,304 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $2,917 2026/27 Lindengrove Diamondgate Briarcliff 1,165 36 41,860 Type II Slurry Seal $23,023 2026/27 Grandbriar Briarcliff Dead End 792 36 29,762 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $16,369 2026/27 Satinbush Collingwood Dead End 141 36 6,326 Type II Slurry Seal $3,479 2026/27 Calle Cortez Via Iglesia Moulton Pkwy 443 36 14,903 Mill and Overlay $38,376 2027/28 Monstad St Monstad St End 68 70 6,010 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $11,916 2027/28 Goldfinch Ln Hummingbird Ln Woodswallow Ln 148 40 5,920 Mill and Overlay + Localized Repairs $22,790 2027/28 Willet Ln Hummingbird Ln Royal Turn Ln 232 36 8,352 Mill and Overlay $21,507 2027/28 Phoebe Ct Royal Tern Dead End 306 30 10,430 Mill and Overlay + Localized Repairs $36,204 2027/28 Laurelmont Alicia Parkway Hollyoak 1,338 40 53,435 Type II Slurry Seal $30,271 2027/28 Autumnglen Aliso Creek Rd Summerfield 1,320 40 52,800 Type II Slurry Seal $29,911 2027/28 Summerfield Autumnglen Aliso Creek 1,543 40 61,720 Type II Slurry Seal $34,965 2027/28 Foxborough Deerhurst Dead End 705 36 25,380 Type II Slurry Seal $14,378 2027/28 Glenhurst Aliso Creek Gate 1,040 40 42,600 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $24,133 2027/28 Boundary Oak Wood Canyon Dr Weybride Wy 864 40 34,420 Type II Slurry Seal $19,499 2027/28 Appendix A ‐ Local Streets
3 of 10 123
From To
Appendix A
Seven Year Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Plan Based on Expected Funding Level LOCAL
Street Name Limits of Work Length of
Segment
Width of
Segment
Pavement Area
(SF) Conceptual Treatment Type Cost of
Treatment
Year of
Treatment
Boundary Oak Weybridge Wy Pleasent Walk 1,178 40 47,120 Type II Slurry Seal $26,694 2027/28 Oakgrove Dr Wood Canyon Dr Pleasant Walk 1,340 40 53,480 Type II Slurry Seal $30,297 2027/28 Enterprise Aliso Viejo Pkwy Summit 1,000 39 37,450 Type II Slurry Seal $21,216 2027/28 Enterprise Summit Aliso Creek Rd 2,035 39 77,915 Type II Slurry Seal $44,139 2027/28 Enterprise Aliso Creek Rd Summit 2,024 39 78,936 Type II Slurry Seal $44,718 2027/28 Enterprise Summit Aliso Viejo Pkwy 1,004 39 39,006 Type II Slurry Seal $22,097 2027/28 Amber Eastwood Dead End 351 36 13,886 Type II Slurry Seal $7,866 2027/28 Spicewood Eastwind Dead End 815 36 30,590 Type II Slurry Seal $17,329 2027/28 Hollyoak Alicia Pkwy Laurelmont 1,225 40 49,000 Type II Slurry Seal $27,759 2027/28 Woodfield Pacific Park Dead End 654 28 19,312 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $10,940 2027/28 Surfbird Ln Seagull Ln Dead End 670 37 26,040 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $14,752 2027/28 Springdale Summerfield Dead End 408 27 11,016 Type II Slurry Seal $6,241 2027/28 Deerhurst Foxborough Pacific Park Dr 1,747 40 69,880 Type II Slurry Seal $39,587 2027/28 Wolverine Way Aliso Creek Sandcastle 954 36 34,194 Type II Slurry Seal $19,371 2027/28 Laurelwood Wood Canyon Cameo Dr 251 36 9,036 Type II Slurry Seal $5,119 2027/28 Charlemont Dr Cameo Dr Deerborn Dr 333 36 11,988 Type II Slurry Seal $6,791 2027/28 Chancey Ct Cameo Dr Dead End 158 36 6,938 Type II Slurry Seal $3,930 2027/28 Deerborn Dr Calypso St Sherwood Dr 528 36 19,008 Type II Slurry Seal $10,768 2027/28 Sherwood Dr Deerborn Dr Sunbury Dr 528 36 19,008 Type II Slurry Seal $10,768 2027/28 Sunbury Dr Sherwood Dr Calypso St 618 36 22,248 Type II Slurry Seal $12,604 2027/28 Calypso St Wood Canyon Dr Sunbury Dr 580 36 20,880 Type II Slurry Seal $11,829 2027/28 Brookstone Pl Somerset Dr Seton Dr 180 36 6,480 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $3,671 2027/28 Seton Dr Brookstone Pl Sunbury Dr 310 36 11,160 Type II Slurry Seal $6,322 2027/28 Poplar Dr Maple Dr Beech Dr 528 40 21,120 Type II Slurry Seal $11,965 2027/28 Beech Dr Poplar Dr Pacific Grove Dr 792 40 31,680 Type II Slurry Seal $17,947 2027/28 Pacific Grove Dr Oakgrove Dr Mallorn Dr 106 40 4,240 Type II Slurry Seal $2,402 2027/28 Chestnut Dr Beech Dr Pacific Grove Dr 528 36 19,008 Type II Slurry Seal $10,768 2027/28 Mallorn Dr Rowan Dr Dead End 1,186 36 44,166 Type II Slurry Seal $25,020 2027/28 Birch Dr Rowan Dr Mallorn Dr 270 36 9,720 Type II Slurry Seal $5,506 2027/28 Walnut Dr Mallorn Dr End 264 36 10,954 Type II Slurry Seal $6,205 2027/28 Stockbridge Boundary Oak Cranwell 653 35 22,855 Type II Slurry Seal $12,947 2027/28 Cliffwood Cranwell Chesterwood 628 30 18,840 Type II Slurry Seal $10,673 2027/28 Chesterwood Cliffwood Barrington 528 30 15,760 Type II Slurry Seal $8,928 2027/28 Berkshire Cranwell Chesterwood 388 30 11,640 Type II Slurry Seal $6,594 2027/28 Wood Canyon Dr Alastair Thistledown 542 43 23,306 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $13,203 2027/28 Sierra Cir Northern Pine Dead End 185 31 6,985 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $3,957 2027/28 Brittany Bay Cayman Brac Key Largo 310 36 11,160 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $6,322 2027/28 Cayman Brac Brittany Bay Key Largo 559 36 20,124 Type II Slurry Seal $11,400 2027/28 Sugarbush Bottlebrush Dead End 630 28 18,890 Type II Slurry Seal $10,701 2027/28 Deerwood Hopseed Dead End 950 36 35,390 Type II Slurry Seal $20,049 2027/28 Appendix A ‐ Local Streets
4 of 10 124
From To
Appendix A
Seven Year Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Plan Based on Expected Funding Level LOCAL
Street Name Limits of Work Length of
Segment
Width of
Segment
Pavement Area
(SF) Conceptual Treatment Type Cost of
Treatment
Year of
Treatment
Rock Rose Canyon Vistas Peppertee 2,073 36 74,628 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $42,277 2027/28 Maple Dr Poplar Dr Pacific Grove Dr 567 40 22,680 Type II Slurry Seal $12,848 2027/28 Highpoint Stonebrook Dead End 957 40 39,530 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $22,394 2027/28 Crossbow Sandbridge Saddleridge 293 36 10,548 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $5,975 2027/28 Eaglepoint End End 507 36 18,252 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $10,340 2027/28 Windstar Flintstone Dead End 95 30 4,100 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $2,323 2027/28 Firecrest Ln Songbird Ln Woodswallow Ln 156 36 5,616 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $3,181 2027/28 Prairie Falcon Crane St Dead End 829 40 34,320 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $19,442 2027/28 Helmcrest Briarcliff Dead End 634 36 24,074 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $13,638 2027/28 Collingwood Briarcliff Diamondgate 730 36 26,280 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $14,888 2027/28 Argonaut Argonaut Glenwood Dr 398 44 17,432 Mill and Overlay + Localized Repairs $92,469 2028/29 Via Iglesia Calle Cortez Moulton Pkwy 1,400 40 57,000 Mill and Overlay $149,365 2028/29 Grand Ave Aliso Viejo Pkwy Vantis Dr (pvt) 264 65 15,310 Mill and Overlay $40,606 2028/29 Journey Aliso Creek Pacific Park Dr 1,829 45 82,155 Type II Slurry Seal $47,937 2028/29 City Lights Dr Pacific Park Prvt Prop 1,390 64 88,960 Type II Slurry Seal $51,908 2028/29 Liberty Pursuit Aliso Creek Rd 955 64 61,120 Type II Slurry Seal $35,664 2028/29 Parkwood Eastwind Dead End 792 36 29,762 Type II Slurry Seal $17,366 2028/29 Woodside Morning Ridge Creekside 807 40 32,130 Type II Slurry Seal $18,748 2028/29 Creekside Woodside Morningridge 792 40 31,680 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $18,485 2028/29 Pursuit Liberty Rue Du Chateau 890 45 40,050 Type II Slurry Seal $23,369 2028/29 Pursuit Rue Du Chateau Lyon Ridge 1,538 45 69,210 Type II Slurry Seal $40,384 2028/29 Pursuit Lyon Ridge Aliso Creek Rd 1,580 45 71,100 Type II Slurry Seal $41,487 2028/29 Lyon Ridge Lyon Ridge Dead End 88 36 3,168 Type II Slurry Seal $1,849 2028/29 Monstad St Pursuit Grindlay Pl 984 40 40,610 Type II Slurry Seal $23,696 2028/29 Grindlay Pl Monstad St Kewen Wy 190 40 8,850 Type II Slurry Seal $5,164 2028/29 Kewen Wy Grindlay Pl Monstad St 538 32 17,216 Type II Slurry Seal $10,046 2028/29 Orion Liberty End 447 45 20,115 Type II Slurry Seal $11,737 2028/29 Knollwood Wood Canyon Dr City Line 528 40 21,120 Type II Slurry Seal $12,324 2028/29 Deerborn Dr Cameo Dr Calypso St 854 36 30,744 Type II Slurry Seal $17,939 2028/29 Cranwell Barrington Cliffwood 528 30 15,840 Type II Slurry Seal $9,243 2028/29 Dusk Wy Dawn Ln Evening Light 264 36 9,504 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $5,546 2028/29 Country Walk Dr Bel Flora Ct Southern Hills Dr 528 40 21,120 Type II Slurry Seal $12,324 2028/29 Southern Hills Dr Bel Flora Ct Dead End 976 40 40,290 Type II Slurry Seal $23,509 2028/29 Gatewood Dr Oakview Dr Dead End 1,105 40 45,450 Type II Slurry Seal $26,520 2028/29 Style Dr Gatewood Dr Dead End 410 36 17,510 Type II Slurry Seal $10,217 2028/29 Style Dr Style Dr End 63 56 3,528 Type II Slurry Seal $2,059 2028/29 Shining Star Wy Gatewood Dr End 102 36 4,922 Type II Slurry Seal $2,872 2028/29 Windsong Aliso Creek (West) Dead End 514 44 22,546 Type II Slurry Seal $2,587 2029/30 Heather Ridge Pacific Park Dr Woodside 471 40 18,725 Mill and Overlay $51,154 2029/30 Canyon Wren Ln Westwing Crane St 1,833 40 73,320 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $150,424 2029/30 Appendix A ‐ Local Streets
5 of 10 125
From To
Appendix A
Seven Year Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Plan Based on Expected Funding Level LOCAL
Street Name Limits of Work Length of
Segment
Width of
Segment
Pavement Area
(SF) Conceptual Treatment Type Cost of
Treatment
Year of
Treatment
Via Iglesia Calle Cortez Moulton Pkwy 1,950 40 78,000 Mill and Overlay $213,084 2029/30 Blackbird Ln Seagull Ln Dead End 886 36 33,146 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $1,268 2029/30 Golf Dr Glenwood End of City Right of Way 1,070 44 10,720 Mill and Overlay $5,896 2029/30 Brookline Brookline Glenwood 380 64 24,320 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $62,186 2029/30 Osprey Ave Surfbird Ln Dead End 264 37 11,018 Mill and Overlay $30,099 2029/30 Midnight Ct Dawn Ln Dead End 158 36 6,938 Mill and Overlay + Localized Repairs $18,954 2029/30 Blue Jay Dr Woodstork Ln Dead End East 398 36 15,548 Mill and Overlay $42,475 2029/30 Chickadee Ln Calle Corta Dead End 1,056 36 39,176 Mill and Overlay $102,849 2029/30 Shorecliff Ridgecrest Dead End 1,848 30 56,690 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $38,407 2029/30 Hummingbird Ln Aliso Creek San Bittern Ln 1,590 40 63,600 Mill and Overlay + Localized Repairs $173,745 2029/30 Hummingbird Ln San Bittern Ln Dead End 1,052 40 42,080 Mill and Overlay + Localized Repairs $118,979 2029/30 Starling Ln Hummingbird Ln Dead End 686 36 25,951 Mill and Overlay + Localized Repairs $70,894 2029/30 Coral Bill Ln Hummingbird Ln Woodswallow 158 40 6,320 Reconstruction $58,699 2029/30 Songbird Ln Trumpeter Ln Firecrest Ln 1,320 36 47,520 Mill and Overlay + Localized Repairs $129,817 2029/30 Trumpeter Ln Woodswallow Ln Songbird Ln 264 36 9,504 Mill and Overlay $25,652 2029/30 White Pelican Ln Blue Heron Ln Dead End 268 36 10,898 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $25,157 2029/30 Royal Tern Ln Dead End Phoebe 953 36 35,558 Mill and Overlay + Localized Repairs $97,139 2029/30 Falcon Crest Ln Royal Tern Ln Sanderling Ln 566 36 20,376 Mill and Overlay $55,664 2029/30 Sanderling Ln Falcon Crest Ln Hummingbird Ln 569 36 20,484 Mill and Overlay + Localized Repairs $55,959 2029/30 Mareblu Pacific Park Dead End 565 38 21,470 Mill and Overlay + Localized Repairs $58,653 2029/30 Oakview Dr Crimson Canyon Endless Vista 1,486 40 59,440 Type II Slurry Seal $35,724 2029/30 Oakview Dr Endless Vista Gate 2,018 40 80,370 Type II Slurry Seal $48,303 2029/30 Lyon Ridge Pursuit Lyon Ridge 157 36 5,652 Type II Slurry Seal $3,397 2029/30 Mesa Cr Lyon Ridge End 260 36 9,360 Type II Slurry Seal $5,625 2029/30 Pacific Grove Dr Oakgrove Dr Maple Dr 528 40 21,120 Type II Slurry Seal $12,693 2029/30 Barrington Cranwell Chesterwood 264 30 7,920 Type II Slurry Seal $4,760 2029/30 Dawn Ln Oakview Dr Dusk Wy 1,255 36 45,180 Type II Slurry Seal $27,153 2029/30 Bel Flora Ct Oakview Dr Country Walk Dr 542 40 21,680 Type II Slurry Seal $13,030 2029/30 Peppertree Pacific Park Dr Sprucewood 1,162 40 46,360 Type II Slurry Seal $27,863 2029/30 Sora Ct Westwing Dead End 73 36 3,478 Type II Slurry Seal $2,090 2029/30 Mayflower Shore Cliff Dead End 421 36 16,406 Mill and Overlay + Localized Repairs $84,201 2030/31 Cedarbrook Starcrest Windsong 900 40 35,920 Type II Slurry Seal $22,236 2030/31 Chase Paradise Bay Sanborn 658 43 28,294 Type II Slurry Seal $17,515 2030/31 Picket Ln Wood Canyon Plateau 143 36 5,098 Type II Slurry Seal $3,156 2030/31 Key Largo Sanborn Cayman Brae 595 36 21,420 Type II Slurry Seal $1,490 2031/32 Da Vinci Glenwood Dr Cedarbrook 1,943 43 83,549 Type II Slurry Seal $53,271 2031/32 Cedarbrook Aliso Viejo Pkwy Starcrest 1,295 40 51,800 Type II Slurry Seal $33,028 2031/32 Cedarbrook Da Vinci Glenwood Dr 1,071 43 46,703 Type II Slurry Seal $29,778 2031/32 Windsong Aliso Creek (East) Cedarbrook 1,400 40 56,000 Type II Slurry Seal $35,706 2031/32 Eastwing Heatherwood Aliso Creek 1,229 40 49,160 Type II Slurry Seal $31,345 2031/32 Appendix A ‐ Local Streets
6 of 10 126
From To
Appendix A
Seven Year Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Plan Based on Expected Funding Level LOCAL
Street Name Limits of Work Length of
Segment
Width of
Segment
Pavement Area
(SF) Conceptual Treatment Type Cost of
Treatment
Year of
Treatment
Eastwing Heatherwood Ramblewood 1,941 40 77,640 Type II Slurry Seal $49,504 2031/32 Grand Ave Aliso Viejo Pkwy Wood Canyon Dr 909 45 39,405 Type II Slurry Seal $25,125 2031/32 Enterprise Pacific Park Dr Antares 418 44 18,392 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $11,727 2031/32 Canyon Vistas Pacific Park Wood Vista Way 953 40 37,970 Type II Slurry Seal $24,210 2031/32 Canyon Vistas Wood Vista Way Silkwood 1,569 40 62,760 Type II Slurry Seal $40,016 2031/32 Westwing Aliso Creek Ramblewood 2,548 40 101,770 Type II Slurry Seal $64,889 2031/32 Westwing Calle Corta Aliso Creek 1,784 40 71,360 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $45,500 2031/32 Canyon Wren Ln Crane St El Toro Rd 1,208 40 48,230 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $30,752 2031/32 Calle Corta Westwing El Toro Rd 1,364 40 54,470 Type II Slurry Seal $34,730 2031/32 Cuervo Dr Canyon Wren Ln Wigeon Ln 1,066 36 38,376 Type II Slurry Seal $24,469 2031/32 Birchmont Cedarbrook Eastwind 804 40 32,160 Type II Slurry Seal $20,505 2031/32 Eastwind Amber Briarglen 1,571 30 47,130 Type II Slurry Seal $30,050 2031/32 Briarglen Eastwind Dahlia 1,077 32 34,304 Type II Slurry Seal $21,872 2031/32 Briarglen Briarglen Dead End 106 60 7,460 Type II Slurry Seal $4,757 2031/32 Coralwind Eastwind Dead End 615 36 23,390 Type II Slurry Seal $14,914 2031/32 Windflower Eastwind Dead End 792 36 29,762 Type II Slurry Seal $18,976 2031/32 Solitaire Ln Seagull Ln Dead End 1,040 36 38,690 Type II Slurry Seal $24,669 2031/32 Swan Ln Surfbird Ln Dead End 370 36 14,510 Type II Slurry Seal $9,252 2031/32 Merlin Ave Surfbird Ln Moorhen Ln 1,672 34 56,788 Type II Slurry Seal $36,208 2031/32 Surfbird Ln Spoonbill Dr Seagull Ln 1,211 37 45,657 Type II Slurry Seal $29,111 2031/32 Deerhurst Wolverine Foxborough 1,808 40 72,320 Type II Slurry Seal $46,112 2031/32 Wolverine Way Sandcastle CDS 1,064 36 38,304 Type II Slurry Seal $24,423 2031/32 Lyon Ridge Lyon Ridge Dead End 796 36 28,656 Type II Slurry Seal $18,271 2031/32 Wigeon Ln Cuervo Dr Pinyon Jay 264 39 10,296 Type II Slurry Seal $6,565 2031/32 Larkspur Dr Spoonbill Dr Skylark Dr 913 40 36,430 Type II Slurry Seal $23,228 2031/32 Skylark Dr Larkspur Dr Eastwing 1,166 40 46,520 Type II Slurry Seal $29,661 2031/32 Myrtle Dr Pacific Park Dr Poplar Dr 106 40 4,240 Type II Slurry Seal $2,703 2031/32 Woodstork Ln Skylark Dr Bluejay Dr 264 36 9,464 Type II Slurry Seal $6,034 2031/32 Wood Canyon Dr Sanborn Grand 703 43 30,179 Type II Slurry Seal $19,242 2031/32 Wood Canyon Dr Grand Alastair 1,354 43 58,222 Type II Slurry Seal $37,123 2031/32 Chase Thisledown Paradise Bay 1,132 43 48,676 Type II Slurry Seal $31,036 2031/32 Sanborn Chase Aurora 1,189 36 42,804 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $27,292 2031/32 Sanborn Aurora Wood Canyon Dr 999 36 35,824 Type II Slurry Seal $22,842 2031/32 Parisville Grand Dead End 398 36 15,578 Type II Slurry Seal $9,933 2031/32 Caledon Ct Richmont Wy Dead End 321 36 12,806 Type II Slurry Seal $8,165 2031/32 Richmont Wy Caledon Ct Kara Ct 534 36 19,224 Type II Slurry Seal $12,257 2031/32 Kara Ct Richmont Wy Dead End 264 36 10,754 Type II Slurry Seal $6,857 2031/32 Plateau North End Picket Ln 1,342 36 49,562 Type II Slurry Seal $31,601 2031/32 Plateau Picket Ln South End 439 36 17,154 Type II Slurry Seal $10,937 2031/32 Ponderosa St Sanborn Northern Pine 131 40 5,160 Type II Slurry Seal $3,290 2031/32 Appendix A ‐ Local Streets
7 of 10 127
From To
Appendix A
Seven Year Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Plan Based on Expected Funding Level LOCAL
Street Name Limits of Work Length of
Segment
Width of
Segment
Pavement Area
(SF) Conceptual Treatment Type Cost of
Treatment
Year of
Treatment
Boulder Cir Northern Pine Dead End 149 36 6,614 Type II Slurry Seal $4,217 2031/32 Moorhen Ln Westwing Mallard Dr 392 36 14,112 Type II Slurry Seal $8,998 2031/32 Cayman Brac Brittany Bay Laguna Madre 643 36 23,148 Type II Slurry Seal $14,759 2031/32 Paradise Bay Chase Cayman Brac 144 36 5,184 Type II Slurry Seal $3,305 2031/32 Laguna Madre Cayman Brac Cape Coral 284 36 10,224 Type II Slurry Seal $6,519 2031/32 Cape Coral Laguna Madre Brittany Bay 712 36 25,632 Type II Slurry Seal $16,343 2031/32 Palm Harbor Cayman Brac Cape Coral 292 36 10,512 Type II Slurry Seal $6,703 2031/32 Peacock Ct Moorhen Ln Dead end 264 36 10,754 Type II Slurry Seal $6,857 2031/32 Silkwood Canyon Vistas Dead End 1,206 36 44,666 Type II Slurry Seal $28,479 2031/32 Bottlebrush Silkwood Hollyleaf 480 36 17,280 Type II Slurry Seal $11,018 2031/32 Hollyleaf Hopseed Bottlebrush 984 36 35,424 Type II Slurry Seal $22,587 2031/32 Hollyleaf Bottlebrush Dead End 1,111 36 40,786 Type II Slurry Seal $26,005 2031/32 Coffeeberry Hollyleaf Dead End 422 36 16,442 Type II Slurry Seal $10,484 2031/32 Sugar Gum Hollyleaf Dead End 335 36 13,310 Type II Slurry Seal $8,487 2031/32 Hopseed Hollyleaf Wood Vista 2,048 40 81,920 Type II Slurry Seal $52,233 2031/32 Golden Rain Hopseed Dead End 770 36 28,910 Type II Slurry Seal $18,433 2031/32 Lantana Hopseed Dead End 792 36 29,762 Type II Slurry Seal $18,976 2031/32 Stone Pine Hopseed Dead End 792 36 29,762 Type II Slurry Seal $18,976 2031/32 Wood Vista Wy Hopseed Canyon Vista 1,136 40 45,440 Type II Slurry Seal $28,973 2031/32 Coastal Oak Canyon Vistas Peppertree 1,848 36 66,408 Type II Slurry Seal $42,342 2031/32 Sprucewood Canyon Vistas Peppertree 2,423 36 87,108 Type II Slurry Seal $55,541 2031/32 Timberland Peppertree Dead End 2,213 36 84,228 Type II Slurry Seal $53,704 2031/32 Sagebrush Timberland Canyon Vistas 312 40 12,400 Type II Slurry Seal $7,906 2031/32 Elderwood Sagebrush Dead End 1,584 36 58,274 Type II Slurry Seal $37,156 2031/32 Peppertree Sprucewood End 1,046 40 42,690 Type II Slurry Seal $27,219 2031/32 Erica Ln Grand Richemont Wy 146 36 5,176 Type II Slurry Seal $3,300 2031/32 Rosy Finch Ln Westwing Dead End 964 36 35,894 Type II Slurry Seal $22,886 2031/32 Pheasant Ln Westwing Dead End 950 36 35,450 Type II Slurry Seal $22,603 2031/32 King Eider Ln Calle Corta Dead End 970 36 36,170 Type II Slurry Seal $23,062 2031/32 Bob White Ln Pinyon Jay Cuervo Dr 264 39 10,276 Type II Slurry Seal $6,552 2031/32 Tanager Ln El Toro Rd Dead End 452 36 17,122 Type II Slurry Seal $10,917 2031/32 Northwinds Westwing Dead End 698 35 25,680 Type II Slurry Seal $16,374 2031/32 Tanglewood Westwing Dead End 1,050 36 38,990 Type II Slurry Seal $24,860 2031/32 Bay Laurel Westwing Coppercrest 514 40 20,560 Type II Slurry Seal $13,109 2031/32 Copper Crest End End 921 36 35,656 Type II Slurry Seal $22,734 2031/32 Nutcracker Ln Cuervo Dr Dead End 421 39 17,579 Type II Slurry Seal $11,208 2031/32 Hazelbranch Baylaurel Dead End 196 36 8,306 Type II Slurry Seal $5,296 2031/32 Stonebrook Westwing Dead End 528 36 20,258 Type II Slurry Seal $12,917 2031/32 Sandbridge Highpoint Heatherwood 1,169 40 46,760 Type II Slurry Seal $29,814 2031/32 Cardinal Ave Canyon Wren Ln Bluebird ln 918 34 31,122 Type II Slurry Seal $19,844 2031/32 Appendix A ‐ Local Streets
8 of 10 128
From To
Appendix A
Seven Year Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Plan Based on Expected Funding Level LOCAL
Street Name Limits of Work Length of
Segment
Width of
Segment
Pavement Area
(SF) Conceptual Treatment Type Cost of
Treatment
Year of
Treatment
Ridgecrest Oakleigh Shorecliff 1,584 30 47,520 Type II Slurry Seal $30,299 2031/32 Timberbluff Ramblewood Dead End 267 36 10,862 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $6,926 2031/32 Crane St Canyon Wren Ln Prarie Falcon 101 40 4,010 Type II Slurry Seal $2,557 2031/32 Bells Vireo Ln Hummingbird Ln El Toro Road 488 40 19,470 Type II Slurry Seal $12,414 2031/32 Satinbush Collingwood Dead End 141 36 6,326 Type II Slurry Seal $4,033 2031/32 Cedarbrook Glenwood Dr Rainwood 1,790 37 66,070 Mill and Overlay + Localized Repairs $259,554 2032/33 Laurelmont Alicia Parkway Hollyoak 1,338 40 53,435 Type II Slurry Seal $35,093 2032/33 Autumnglen Aliso Creek Rd Summerfield 1,320 40 52,800 Type II Slurry Seal $34,676 2032/33 Summerfield Autumnglen Aliso Creek 1,543 40 61,720 Type II Slurry Seal $40,534 2032/33 Foxborough Deerhurst Dead End 705 36 25,380 Type II Slurry Seal $16,668 2032/33 Glenhurst Aliso Creek Gate 1,040 40 42,600 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $27,977 2032/33 Boundary Oak Wood Canyon Dr Weybride Wy 864 40 34,420 Type II Slurry Seal $22,605 2032/33 Boundary Oak Weybridge Wy Pleasent Walk 1,178 40 47,120 Type II Slurry Seal $30,945 2032/33 Oakgrove Dr Wood Canyon Dr Pleasant Walk 1,340 40 53,480 Type II Slurry Seal $35,122 2032/33 Oakview Dr Wood Canyon Dr Crimson Canyon 943 40 37,600 Type II Slurry Seal $24,693 2032/33 Enterprise Aliso Viejo Pkwy Summit 1,000 39 37,450 Type II Slurry Seal $24,595 2032/33 Enterprise Summit Aliso Creek Rd 2,035 39 77,915 Type II Slurry Seal $51,169 2032/33 Enterprise Aliso Creek Rd Summit 2,024 39 78,936 Type II Slurry Seal $51,840 2032/33 Enterprise Summit Aliso Viejo Pkwy 1,004 39 39,006 Type II Slurry Seal $25,617 2032/33 Egret Ln Prarie Falcon Seagull Ln 2,039 40 81,500 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $53,524 2032/33 Saddleridge Highpoint Dead End 1,097 36 40,742 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $26,757 2032/33 Seagull Ln Surfbird Ln Canyon Wren Ln 933 40 37,320 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $24,509 2032/33 Amber Eastwood Dead End 351 36 13,886 Type II Slurry Seal $9,119 2032/33 Spicewood Eastwind Dead End 815 36 30,590 Type II Slurry Seal $20,090 2032/33 Hollyoak Alicia Pkwy Laurelmont 1,225 40 49,000 Type II Slurry Seal $32,180 2032/33 Woodfield Pacific Park Dead End 654 28 19,312 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $12,683 2032/33 Springdale Summerfield Dead End 408 27 11,016 Type II Slurry Seal $7,235 2032/33 Deerhurst Foxborough Pacific Park Dr 1,747 40 69,880 Type II Slurry Seal $45,893 2032/33 Wolverine Way Aliso Creek Sandcastle 954 36 34,194 Type II Slurry Seal $22,456 2032/33 Spoonbill Dr Surfbird Ln Lakespur Dr 528 40 21,120 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $13,870 2032/33 Laurelwood Wood Canyon Cameo Dr 251 36 9,036 Type II Slurry Seal $5,934 2032/33 Cameo Dr Laurelwood St Charlemont Dr 752 36 27,022 Type II Slurry Seal $17,746 2032/33 Charlemont Dr Cameo Dr Deerborn Dr 333 36 11,988 Type II Slurry Seal $7,873 2032/33 Chancey Ct Cameo Dr Dead End 158 36 6,938 Type II Slurry Seal $4,556 2032/33 Deerborn Dr Calypso St Sherwood Dr 528 36 19,008 Type II Slurry Seal $12,483 2032/33 Sherwood Dr Deerborn Dr Sunbury Dr 528 36 19,008 Type II Slurry Seal $12,483 2032/33 Sunbury Dr Sherwood Dr Calypso St 618 36 22,248 Type II Slurry Seal $14,611 2032/33 Calypso St Wood Canyon Dr Sunbury Dr 580 36 20,880 Type II Slurry Seal $13,713 2032/33 Brookstone Pl Somerset Dr Seton Dr 180 36 6,480 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $4,256 2032/33 Seton Dr Brookstone Pl Sunbury Dr 310 36 11,160 Type II Slurry Seal $7,329 2032/33 Appendix A ‐ Local Streets
9 of 10 129
From To
Appendix A
Seven Year Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Plan Based on Expected Funding Level LOCAL
Street Name Limits of Work Length of
Segment
Width of
Segment
Pavement Area
(SF) Conceptual Treatment Type Cost of
Treatment
Year of
Treatment
Poplar Dr Maple Dr Beech Dr 528 40 21,120 Type II Slurry Seal $13,870 2032/33 Beech Dr Poplar Dr Pacific Grove Dr 792 40 31,680 Type II Slurry Seal $20,805 2032/33 Pacific Grove Dr Oakgrove Dr Mallorn Dr 106 40 4,240 Type II Slurry Seal $2,785 2032/33 Chestnut Dr Beech Dr Pacific Grove Dr 528 36 19,008 Type II Slurry Seal $12,483 2032/33 Mallorn Dr Rowan Dr Dead End 1,186 36 44,166 Type II Slurry Seal $29,005 2032/33 Birch Dr Rowan Dr Mallorn Dr 270 36 9,720 Type II Slurry Seal $6,383 2032/33 Walnut Dr Mallorn Dr End 264 36 10,954 Type II Slurry Seal $7,194 2032/33 Stockbridge Boundary Oak Cranwell 653 35 22,855 Type II Slurry Seal $15,010 2032/33 Raven Ln Skylark Dr Dead End 1,490 36 54,800 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $35,989 2032/33 Cliffwood Cranwell Chesterwood 628 30 18,840 Type II Slurry Seal $12,373 2032/33 Chesterwood Cliffwood Barrington 528 30 15,760 Type II Slurry Seal $10,350 2032/33 Berkshire Cranwell Chesterwood 388 30 11,640 Type II Slurry Seal $7,644 2032/33 Wood Canyon Dr Alastair Thistledown 542 43 23,306 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $15,306 2032/33 Pierremont Parisville Dead end 910 36 33,950 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $22,296 2032/33 Nantais Pierremont Dead End 264 36 10,754 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $7,063 2032/33 Oak Ridge Cir Northern Pine Dead End 183 36 7,838 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $5,147 2032/33 Cayman Brac Brittany Bay Key Largo 559 36 20,124 Type II Slurry Seal $13,216 2032/33 Pinyon Jay Wigeon Ln Bob White 206 39 8,034 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $5,276 2032/33 Sugarbush Bottlebrush Dead End 630 28 18,890 Type II Slurry Seal $12,406 2032/33 Deerwood Hopseed Dead End 950 36 35,390 Type II Slurry Seal $23,242 2032/33 Rock Rose Canyon Vistas Peppertee 2,073 36 74,628 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $49,011 2032/33 Maple Dr Poplar Dr Pacific Grove Dr 567 40 22,680 Type II Slurry Seal $14,895 2032/33 Highpoint Stonebrook Dead End 957 40 39,530 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $25,961 2032/33 Crossbow Sandbridge Saddleridge 293 36 10,548 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $6,927 2032/33 Pathfinder Saddleridge Eaglepoint 264 36 9,504 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $6,242 2032/33 Heatherwood Eastwing Dead End 931 36 34,706 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $22,793 2032/33 Ramblewood Shorecliff Westwing 574 34 19,456 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $12,777 2032/33 Flintstone Eastwing Dead End 1,320 30 40,850 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $26,828 2032/33 Windstar Flintstone Dead End 95 30 4,100 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $2,693 2032/33 Bluebird Ln Cardinal Ave Dead End 921 34 32,564 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $21,386 2032/33 Diamond Gate Lindengrove Dead End 1,481 36 54,706 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $35,927 2032/33 Crystal Glen Diamondgate Dead End 332 36 13,202 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $8,670 2032/33 Goldenfield Diamondgate Dead End 114 36 5,304 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $3,483 2032/33 Lindengrove Diamondgate Briarcliff 1,165 36 41,860 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $27,491 2032/33 Grandbriar Briarcliff Dead End 792 36 29,762 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $19,546 2032/33 Helmcrest Briarcliff Dead End 634 36 24,074 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $15,810 2032/33 Collingwood Briarcliff Diamondgate 730 36 26,280 Type II Slurry Seal + Localized Repairs $17,259 2032/33 Appendix A ‐ Local Streets
10 of 10 130
Pavement Management Plan Local Jurisdiction Submittal
Page | 13
XII. Appendix B – Complete Listing of Current Street Conditions A complete listing of current pavement conditions should be included in this report. Specific data to be submitted should follow the format below:
MPAH
Street Name From To Width of Segment Area Current PCI Most Recent Inspection Date
LOCAL
Street Name From To Width of Segment Area Current PCI Most Recent Inspection Date
Please attach the complete street listing, following the above template, after this sheet. The pages should be labeled Appendix B.
131
Alicia Parkway Holly Oak 73 Overpass 42 21,966 88 6/27/2025 Alicia Parkway Pacific Park Morning Ridge 41 47,273 88 6/27/2025 Alicia Parkway Holly Oak North City Limits 41 57,236 90 6/27/2025 Alicia Parkway North City Limits Holly Oak 42 58,506 91 6/27/2025 Alicia Parkway Morning Ridge Pacific Park Dr 42 48,468 89 6/27/2025 Alicia Parkway 73 Overpass Morning Ridge 42 21,546 93 6/27/2025 Alicia Parkway 73 Overpass Holly Oak 41 21,320 87 6/27/2025 Alicia Parkway Morning Ridge 73 Overpass 41 21,074 86 6/27/2025 Aliso Creek Rd 73 Toll Overpass Enterprise 51 71,655 100 7/3/2025 Aliso Creek Rd Enterprise Autumnglen 48 47,218 73 7/1/2025 Aliso Creek Rd City Limits (Bridge) Wood Canyon Dr 48 35,830 94 7/1/2025 Aliso Creek Rd Enterprise 73 Toll Overpass 51 70,205 100 7/3/2025 Aliso Creek Rd Windsong 73 Toll Overpass 51 66,688 91 7/1/2025 Aliso Creek Rd Glenwood Dr Columbia 41 71,694 65 7/3/2025 Aliso Creek Rd Pursuit Wood Canyon Dr 48 47,280 94 7/1/2025 Aliso Creek Rd Pacific Park Dr Journey 48 67,056 79 7/1/2025 Aliso Creek Rd Journey Pacific Park Dr 48 68,304 74 7/1/2025 Aliso Creek Rd Eastwing Westwing 41 87,297 56 7/3/2025
Aliso Creek Rd Aliso Viejo Pkwy Windsong 41 41,254 92 7/1/2025 Aliso Creek Rd Pacific Park Dr Autumnglen 48 49,570 73 7/2/2025 Aliso Creek Rd Autumnglen Pacific Park Dr 48 49,670 68 7/2/2025 Aliso Creek Rd Wood Canyon Dr Pursuit 48 45,342 92 7/1/2025 Aliso Creek Rd Liberty Pursuit 48 43,666 95 7/1/2025
Aliso Creek Rd Liberty Aliso Viejo Pkwy 48 83,066 94 7/1/2025 Aliso Creek Rd Columbia Glenwood Dr 40 69,150 59 7/3/2025 Aliso Creek Rd Westwing Eastwing 41 88,970 59 7/3/2025
Aliso Creek Rd Hummingbird Ln El Toro Rd 41 26,846 60 7/2/2025 Aliso Creek Rd Aliso Viejo Pkwy Liberty 48 83,266 95 7/1/2025 Aliso Creek Rd Aliso Viejo Pkwy Journey 48 51,342 74 7/1/2025 Aliso Creek Rd El Toro Rd Hummingbird Ln 41 25,851 61 7/2/2025 Aliso Creek Rd Windsong Aliso Viejo Pkwy 40 40,790 95 7/1/2025 Aliso Creek Rd Wood Canyon Dr City Limits (Bridge) 48 35,520 93 7/1/2025 Aliso Creek Rd 73 Toll Overpass Windsong 51 68,646 95 7/1/2025 Aliso Creek Rd Columbia Aliso Viejo Pkwy 41 79,389 67 7/3/2025 Aliso Creek Rd Westwing Hummingbird Ln 41 90,350 70 7/3/2025 Aliso Creek Rd Pursuit Liberty 48 43,430 94 7/1/2025
Aliso Creek Rd Autumnglen Enterprise 48 47,318 78 7/1/2025 Aliso Creek Rd Hummingbird Ln Westwing 41 91,714 70 7/3/2025 Aliso Creek Rd Eastwing Glenwood Dr 41 46,371 56 7/3/2025 Aliso Creek Rd Glenwood Dr Eastwing 41 45,413 54 7/3/2025 Aliso Creek Rd Journey Aliso Viejo Pkwy 48 52,896 77 7/1/2025 Appendix B
Complete Street Listing Current Conditions
MPAH
Street Name From To Width of Segment Area (SF) Current PCI Most Recent Inspection Date
Appendix B ‐ MPAH
1 of 3 132
Appendix B
Complete Street Listing Current Conditions
MPAH
Street Name From To Width of Segment Area (SF) Current PCI Most Recent Inspection Date
Aliso Creek Rd Aliso Viejo Pkwy Columbia 40 78,250 66 7/3/2025 Aliso Viejo Parkway Columbia Aliso Creek Rd 45 70,615 68 7/3/2025 Aliso Viejo Parkway Endeavor Pacific Park Dr 48 54,432 64 7/3/2025 Aliso Viejo Parkway Briarglen Moulton Pkwy 49 31,397 80 7/3/2025 Aliso Viejo Parkway Cedarbrook Aliso Creek Rd 49 31,727 72 7/3/2025 Aliso Viejo Parkway Pacific Park Dr 1134 n/o Pacific Park Dr 51 56,036 74 7/3/2025 Aliso Viejo Parkway Aliso Creek Rd Cedarbrook 49 31,776 69 7/3/2025 Aliso Viejo Parkway Enterprise Columbia 45 76,995 53 7/3/2025 Aliso Viejo Parkway Liberty Aliso Creek Rd 40 49,440 77 7/3/2025 Aliso Viejo Parkway Liberty Pacific Park Dr 44 79,816 75 7/3/2025 Aliso Viejo Parkway Vantis Dr Grand 48 48,240 71 7/3/2025 Aliso Viejo Parkway Columbia Enterprise 45 76,360 53 7/3/2025 Aliso Viejo Parkway Briarglen Cedarbrook 49 75,360 92 7/3/2025 Aliso Viejo Parkway Vantis Dr Enterprise 48 56,334 65 7/3/2025 Aliso Viejo Parkway Grand Endeavor 48 55,426 75 7/3/2025 Aliso Viejo Parkway Grand Vantis Dr 48 46,546 73 7/3/2025 Aliso Viejo Parkway Aliso Creek Rd Columbia 49 76,848 54 7/3/2025 Aliso Viejo Parkway Aliso Creek Rd Liberty 44 52,592 75 7/3/2025 Aliso Viejo Parkway Endeavor Grand 49 58,163 77 7/3/2025 Aliso Viejo Parkway Cedarbrook Briarglen 49 73,910 87 7/3/2025 Aliso Viejo Parkway Enterprise Vantis Dr 48 56,674 70 7/3/2025 Aliso Viejo Parkway Pacific Park Dr Liberty 40 71,336 74 7/3/2025 Aliso Viejo Parkway Moulton Pkwy Briarglen 49 29,547 91 7/3/2025 Glenwood Dr Aliso Creek Rd Argonaut 42 43,164 70 7/2/2025 Glenwood Dr Argonaut Aliso Creek Rd 42 44,954 76 7/2/2025 Glenwood Dr Da Vinci City Limits 42 37,044 72 7/2/2025
Glenwood Dr City Limits Da Vinci 42 36,750 68 7/2/2025
Glenwood Dr Aliso Creek Rd Brookline 42 65,440 100 11/30/2025 Glenwood Dr SR 73 Bridge Brookline 42 41,874 100 11/30/2025 Glenwood Dr Cedarbrook Argonaut 42 38,560 73 7/2/2025
Glenwood Dr Brookline Aliso Creek Rd 42 65,062 100 11/30/2025 Glenwood Dr Cedarbrook Da Vinci 42 45,962 72 7/2/2025
Glenwood Dr Argonaut Cedarbrook 42 40,110 71 7/2/2025
Glenwood Dr Brookline SR 73 Bridge 42 41,774 100 11/30/2025 Glenwood Dr Da Vinci Cedarbrook 42 47,922 75 7/2/2025
La Paz Road Pacific Park Drive North City Limits 33 69,465 81 6/27/2025 La Paz Road North City LImits Pacific Park Dr 33 69,861 89 6/27/2025 Pacific Park Dr Enterprise Coronado Cay 41 51,098 83 6/27/2025 Pacific Park Dr Bridge w/s Aliso Creek Rd 96 68,928 81 6/30/2025 Pacific Park Dr Aliso Niguel City Limits 42 67,742 70 6/30/2025 Pacific Park Dr Aliso Niguel La Paz 42 26,544 75 6/30/2025 Appendix B ‐ MPAH
2 of 3 133
Appendix B
Complete Street Listing Current Conditions
MPAH
Street Name From To Width of Segment Area (SF) Current PCI Most Recent Inspection Date
Pacific Park Dr Coronado Cay Enterprise 41 50,041 84 6/27/2025 Pacific Park Dr La Paz Rd Heather Ridge 75 91,575 60 6/27/2025 Pacific Park Dr Aliso Creek Rd Bridge w/s 48 68,928 82 6/27/2025 Pacific Park Dr Chase Canyon Vistas 42 53,940 82 6/27/2025 Pacific Park Dr City Lights Dr Aliso Viejo Pkwy 42 52,796 93 6/27/2025 Pacific Park Dr Aliso Creek Rd City Lights Dr 42 38,096 86 6/27/2025 Pacific Park Dr Aliso Viejo Pkwy City Lights Dr 48 60,524 91 6/27/2025 Pacific Park Dr 73 Toll Overpass Enterprise 41 19,475 82 6/27/2025 Pacific Park Dr Chase Cheyenne 41 69,207 72 6/27/2025
Pacific Park Dr Coronado Cay Canyon Vistas 41 33,087 86 6/27/2025 Pacific Park Dr Cheyenne Wood Canyon Dr 41 50,881 72 6/27/2025 Pacific Park Dr Cheyenne Chase 42 72,156 72 6/27/2025
Pacific Park Dr La Paz Rd Aliso Niguel 42 26,796 47 6/30/2025 Pacific Park Dr Alicia Pkwy Bridge e/s 48 56,016 69 6/27/2025 Pacific Park Dr Canyon Vistas Coronado Cay 40 30,600 84 6/27/2025 Pacific Park Dr Aliso Viejo Pkwy Wood Canyon Dr 42 55,256 62 6/27/2025 Pacific Park Dr Wood Canyon Dr Cheyenne 42 50,662 76 6/27/2025 Pacific Park Dr Heather Ridge Alicia Pkwy 75 41,664 59 6/30/2025 Pacific Park Dr City Lights Dr Aliso Creek Rd 48 44,668 92 6/27/2025 Pacific Park Dr Canyon Vistas Chase 42 54,352 92 6/27/2025 Pacific Park Dr Bridge e/s Alicia Pkwy 48 56,256 72 6/27/2025 Pacific Park Dr Wood Canyon Dr Aliso Viejo Pkwy 48 64,068 75 6/27/2025 Pacific Park Dr Enterprise 73 Toll Overpass 41 20,407 82 6/27/2025 Pacific Park Dr City Limits Aliso Niguel 42 69,552 73 6/30/2025 Wood Canyon Dr Huntington Ln (Access Rd) Westridge Dr 55 62,535 92 7/2/2025 Wood Canyon Dr Valencia Tivoli 50 49,600 94 7/2/2025
Wood Canyon Dr Las Flores Valencia 50 83,200 93 7/2/2025 Wood Canyon Dr SOKA South Entrance Calypso St 61 67,222 94 7/2/2025 Wood Canyon Dr Oak View Dr Huntington Ln (Access Rd) 55 76,300 92 7/2/2025 Wood Canyon Dr Westridge Dr Pacific Park Dr 70 69,360 87 7/2/2025 Wood Canyon Dr Aliso Creek Las Flores 50 53,850 93 7/2/2025 Wood Canyon Dr Tivoli Cottage Ln 50 48,900 93 7/2/2025
Wood Canyon Dr Calypso St Oak View Dr 61 98,612 91 7/2/2025 Wood Canyon Dr Cottage Ln SOKA South Entrance 61 93,897 93 7/2/2025 Appendix B ‐ MPAH
3 of 3 134
Amber Eastwood Dead End 36 13,886. 91 5/30/2025
Argonaut Argonaut Argonaut 44 71,852. 52 6/16/2025
Argonaut Aliso Creek Rd Argonaut 44 65,252. 47 6/16/2025 Argonaut Argonaut Glenwood Dr 44 17,432. 48 6/16/2025
Autumnglen Aliso Creek Rd Summerfield 40 52,800. 84 6/30/2025 Barrington Cranwell Chesterwood 30 7,920. 91 5/30/2025
Bay Laurel Westwing Coppercrest 40 20,560. 84 5/28/2025 Bearberry Timberland Dead End 36 6,938. 71 6/12/2025
Beech Dr Poplar Dr Pacific Grove Dr 40 31,680. 90 6/6/2025 Bel Flora Ct Oakview Dr Country Walk Dr 40 21,680. 93 6/11/2025 Bells Vireo Ln Hummingbird Ln El Toro Road 40 19,470. 84 5/23/2025 Berkshire Cranwell Chesterwood 30 11,640. 86 5/30/2025
Birch Dr Rowan Dr Mallorn Dr 36 9,720. 87 6/6/2025
Birchmont Cedarbrook Eastwind 40 32,160. 86 5/30/2025
Blackbird Ln Seagull Ln Dead End 36 33,146. 82 5/29/2025 Blue Heron Ln San Bittern Ln Dead End 36 21,612. 59 5/23/2025 Blue Jay Dr Woodstork Ln Dead End West 36 18,170. 76 6/4/2025 Blue Jay Dr Woodstork Ln Dead End East 36 15,548. 69 6/4/2025 Bluebird Ln Cardinal Ave Dead End 34 32,564. 80 5/28/2025 Bob White Ln Pinyon Jay Cuervo Dr 39 10,276. 85 5/28/2025 Bottlebrush Silkwood Hollyleaf 36 17,280. 90 6/2/2025
Boulder Cir Northern Pine Dead End 36 6,614. 83 9/2/2025 Boundary Oak Weybridge Wy Pleasent Walk 40 47,120. 86 6/6/2025 Boundary Oak Wood Canyon Dr Weybride Wy 40 34,420. 89 6/6/2025 Briarcliff Lindengrove Westwing 36 41,034. 74 5/23/2025 Briarglen Briarglen Dead End 60 7,460. 81 5/30/2025
Briarglen Eastwind Dahlia 32 34,304. 90 5/30/2025
Briarglen Dahlia Aliso Viejo Pkwy 32 32,032. 85 5/30/2025 Brittany Bay Cayman Brac Key Largo 36 11,160. 78 6/2/2025 Brookline Brookline Glenwood 64 24,320. 73 6/30/2025
Brookline Aliso Creek Rd Dead End 44 69,404. 63 6/30/2025 Brookstone Pl Somerset Dr Seton Dr 36 6,480. 80 6/4/2025 Brooktree Oakleigh Dead End 30 15,210. 76 5/29/2025
Caledon Ct Richmont Wy Dead End 36 12,806. 88 6/2/2025
Calle Corta Westwing El Toro Rd 40 54,470. 84 5/28/2025 Calle Cortez Via Iglesia Moulton Pkwy 36 14,903. 70 6/11/2025 Calypso St Wood Canyon Dr Sunbury Dr 36 20,880. 89 6/4/2025 Cameo Dr Laurelwood St Charlemont Dr 36 27,022. 92 6/4/2025 Canyon Vistas Pacific Park Wood Vista Way 40 37,970. 89 6/27/2025 Canyon Vistas Wood Vista Way Silkwood 40 62,760. 85 6/27/2025 Appendix B
Complete Street Listing Current Conditions
Local Streets
Street Name From To Width of Segment Area (SF) Current PCI Most Recent Inspection Date Appendix B ‐ Local Streets
1 of 8 135
Appendix B
Complete Street Listing Current Conditions
Local Streets
Street Name From To Width of Segment Area (SF) Current PCI Most Recent Inspection Date Canyon Wren Ln Westwing Crane St 40 73,320. 75 5/28/2025 Canyon Wren Ln Crane St El Toro Rd 40 48,230. 79 5/28/2025 Cape Coral Laguna Madre Brittany Bay 36 25,632. 87 6/2/2025 Cardinal Ave Canyon Wren Ln Bluebird ln 34 31,122. 85 5/28/2025 Cayman Brac Brittany Bay Key Largo 36 20,124. 90 6/2/2025 Cayman Brac Brittany Bay Laguna Madre 36 23,148. 88 6/2/2025 Cedarbrook Windsong Park Ave 40 64,560. 93 5/30/2025
Cedarbrook Da Vinci Glenwood Dr 43 46,703. 82 5/30/2025 Cedarbrook Glenwood Dr Rainwood 37 66,070. 62 5/30/2025 Cedarbrook Starcrest Windsong 40 35,920. 91 5/30/2025
Cedarbrook Rainwood Aliso Viejo Pkwy 37 55,790. 72 5/30/2025 Cedarbrook Aliso Viejo Pkwy Starcrest 40 51,800. 82 5/30/2025 Chancey Ct Cameo Dr Dead End 36 6,938. 82 6/4/2025
Charlemont Dr Cameo Dr Deerborn Dr 36 11,988. 88 6/4/2025 Chase Thisledown Paradise Bay 43 48,676. 86 7/2/2025
Chase Paradise Bay Sanborn 43 28,294. 91 7/2/2025
Chase Sanborn Pacific Park Dr 43 25,241. 92 7/2/2025
Chesterwood Cliffwood Barrington 30 15,760. 88 5/30/2025 Chestnut Dr Beech Dr Pacific Grove Dr 36 19,008. 87 6/6/2025 Chickadee Ln Calle Corta Dead End 36 39,176. 73 9/2/2025 City Lights Dr Pacific Park Prvt Prop 64 88,960. 90 7/1/2025 Cliffwood Cranwell Chesterwood 30 18,840. 89 5/30/2025
Clusterberry Timberland Elderwood 36 5,608. 75 6/12/2025 Coastal Oak Canyon Vistas Peppertree 36 66,408. 87 6/12/2025 Coffeeberry Hollyleaf Dead End 36 16,442. 88 6/2/2025
Collingwood Briarcliff Diamondgate 36 26,280. 79 5/28/2025 Columbia Aliso Creek Rd Aliso Viejo Pkwy 44 71,208. 48 6/16/2025 Columbia Columbia Columbia 36 64,656. 43 6/16/2025
Columbia Columbia End 40 17,580. 46 6/16/2025
Condor Ln Sanderling Ln Hummingbird Ln 36 4,536. 64 5/22/2025 Copper Crest End End 36 35,656. 82 5/28/2025
Coral Bill Ln Hummingbird Ln Woodswallow 40 6,320. 33 5/23/2025 Coralwind Eastwind Dead End 36 23,390. 87 5/30/2025
Country Walk Dr Bel Flora Ct Southern Hills Dr 40 21,120. 90 6/11/2025 Crane St Canyon Wren Ln Prarie Falcon 40 4,010. 89 5/22/2025 Cranwell Barrington Cliffwood 30 15,840. 91 5/30/2025
Creekside Woodside Morningridge 40 31,680. 82 6/30/2025 Crestview Meadow Point Dead End 36 27,638. 73 5/23/2025 Crossbow Sandbridge Saddleridge 36 10,548. 79 5/29/2025 Crystal Glen Diamondgate Dead End 36 13,202. 81 5/23/2025 Appendix B ‐ Local Streets
2 of 8 136
Appendix B
Complete Street Listing Current Conditions
Local Streets
Street Name From To Width of Segment Area (SF) Current PCI Most Recent Inspection Date Cuervo Dr Canyon Wren Ln Wigeon Ln 36 38,376. 91 5/29/2025 Da Vinci Glenwood Dr Cedarbrook 43 83,549. 82 5/30/2025 Dawn Ln Oakview Dr Dusk Wy 36 45,180. 93 6/11/2025
Deerborn Dr Calypso St Sherwood Dr 36 19,008. 89 6/4/2025 Deerborn Dr Cameo Dr Calypso St 36 30,744. 91 6/4/2025
Deerhurst Foxborough Pacific Park Dr 40 69,880. 91 7/1/2025 Deerhurst Wolverine Foxborough 40 72,320. 91 7/1/2025
Deerwood Hopseed Dead End 36 35,390. 90 6/11/2025
Diamond Gate Lindengrove Dead End 36 54,706. 81 5/23/2025 Dove Ln Macaw St Dead End 36 16,454. 77 6/4/2025
Dunlin Ln Surfbird Ln Dead End 38 21,314. 74 5/29/2025
Duray Ct Monstad St End 40 11,810. 95 5/30/2025
Dusk Wy Dawn Ln Evening Light 36 9,504. 85 6/11/2025
Eaglepoint End End 36 18,252. 78 5/29/2025
Eastwind Amber Briarglen 30 47,130. 87 5/30/2025
Eastwing Heatherwood Ramblewood 40 77,640. 82 6/16/2025 Eastwing Heatherwood Aliso Creek 40 49,160. 84 6/16/2025 Eastwing Skylark Dr Aliso Creek Rd 40 21,570. 72 6/4/2025 Egret Ln Prarie Falcon Seagull Ln 40 81,500. 80 5/29/2025 Elderwood Sagebrush Dead End 36 58,274. 86 6/12/2025
Enterprise Summit Aliso Viejo Pkwy 39 39,006. 94 6/27/2025 Enterprise Antares Pacific Park Dr 35 16,180. 75 6/27/2025 Enterprise Antares Aliso Viejo Pkwy 44 76,318. 76 6/27/2025 Enterprise Pacific Park Dr Antares 44 18,392. 79 6/27/2025 Enterprise Aliso Creek Rd Summit 39 78,936. 94 6/27/2025 Enterprise Aliso Viejo Pkwy Summit 39 37,450. 95 6/27/2025 Enterprise Summit Aliso Creek Rd 39 77,915. 93 6/27/2025 Enterprise Aliso Viejo Pkwy Antares 35 61,970. 72 6/27/2025 Erica Ln Grand Richemont Wy 36 5,176. 91 6/12/2025
Evening Light Ln Dusk Wy Dawn Ln 36 31,176. 82 6/11/2025 Falcon Crest Ln Royal Tern Ln Sanderling Ln 36 20,376. 71 5/22/2025 Firecrest Ln Songbird Ln Woodswallow Ln 36 5,616. 78 5/23/2025 Flintstone Eastwing Dead End 30 40,850. 81 5/29/2025
Foxborough Deerhurst Dead End 36 25,380. 93 7/1/2025
Freedom Ln Liberty East End 33 35,550. 92 6/4/2025
Gala Ct Richmont Wy Dead End 36 10,754. 80 6/2/2025
Gatewood Dr Oakview Dr Dead End 40 45,450. 91 6/6/2025
Glenhurst Aliso Creek Gate 40 42,600. 79 7/1/2025
Golden Eagle Ct Surfbird Ln Dead End 37 11,018. 93 5/29/2025 Golden Rain Hopseed Dead End 36 28,910. 87 6/11/2025
Appendix B ‐ Local Streets
3 of 8 137
Appendix B
Complete Street Listing Current Conditions
Local Streets
Street Name From To Width of Segment Area (SF) Current PCI Most Recent Inspection Date Goldenfield Diamondgate Dead End 36 5,304. 80 5/23/2025 Goldfinch Ln Hummingbird Ln Woodswallow Ln 40 5,920. 57 5/23/2025 Golf Dr Glenwood End of City Right of Way 44 10,720. 73 6/16/2025 Grand Ave Aliso Viejo Pkwy Wood Canyon Dr 45 39,405. 83 7/2/2025 Grand Ave Aliso Viejo Pkwy Vantis Dr (pvt) 65 15,310. 69 7/2/2025 Grandbriar Briarcliff Dead End 36 29,762. 80 5/28/2025
Grindlay Pl Monstad St Kewen Wy 40 8,850. 89 5/30/2025
Hazelbranch Baylaurel Dead End 36 8,306. 83 9/2/2025
Heather Ridge Pacific Park Dr Woodside 40 18,725. 77 6/30/2025 Heatherwood Eastwing Dead End 36 34,706. 80 5/29/2025
Helmcrest Briarcliff Dead End 36 24,074. 79 5/23/2025
Highpoint Stonebrook Dead End 40 39,530. 79 5/29/2025
Hollyleaf Hopseed Bottlebrush 36 35,424. 87 6/2/2025
Hollyleaf Bottlebrush Dead End 36 40,786. 83 6/2/2025
Hollyoak Alicia Pkwy Laurelmont 40 49,000. 88 6/30/2025 Hopseed Hollyleaf Wood Vista 40 81,920. 84 6/12/2025
Hummingbird Ln Aliso Creek San Bittern Ln 40 63,600. 67 5/23/2025 Hummingbird Ln San Bittern Ln Dead End 40 42,080. 63 5/23/2025 Journey Aliso Creek Pacific Park Dr 45 82,155. 90 7/1/2025 Journey Journey (N) Journey (S) 45 144,165. 92 7/1/2025 Kara Ct Richmont Wy Dead End 36 10,754. 88 6/2/2025
Kewen Wy Grindlay Pl Monstad St 32 17,216. 89 5/30/2025 Key Largo Sanborn Cayman Brae 36 21,420. 83 6/2/2025
King Eider Ln Calle Corta Dead End 36 36,170. 82 5/28/2025 Knollwood Wood Canyon Dr City Line 40 21,120. 85 6/4/2025 Laguna Madre Cayman Brac Cape Coral 36 10,224. 89 6/2/2025 Lantana Hopseed Dead End 36 29,762. 82 6/11/2025
Larkspur Dr Spoonbill Dr Skylark Dr 40 36,430. 83 6/4/2025 Laurelmont Alicia Parkway Hollyoak 40 53,435. 86 6/30/2025 Laurelwood Wood Canyon Cameo Dr 36 9,036. 88 6/4/2025
Liberty 1033' s/o Aliso Viejo Pkwy Pursuit 64 139,456. 93 7/1/2025 Liberty Aliso Viejo Pkwy 1033' s/o Aliso Viejo Pkwy 64 66,112. 92 7/1/2025 Liberty Pursuit Aliso Creek Rd 64 61,120. 92 7/1/2025
Lilac Hollyleaf Dead End 36 6,615. 95 6/2/2025
Lindengrove Diamondgate Briarcliff 36 41,860. 80 5/23/2025 Lynoak Briarglen Dead End 36 10,754. 83 5/30/2025
Lyon Ridge Lyon Ridge Dead End 36 28,656. 92 5/30/2025
Lyon Ridge Pursuit Lyon Ridge 36 5,652. 93 5/30/2025
Lyon Ridge Lyon Ridge Dead End 36 3,168. 92 5/30/2025
Macaw St Larkspur Dr Dove 36 9,504. 72 6/4/2025
Appendix B ‐ Local Streets
4 of 8 138
Appendix B
Complete Street Listing Current Conditions
Local Streets
Street Name From To Width of Segment Area (SF) Current PCI Most Recent Inspection Date Mallard Dr Moorhen Dead End 36 16,802. 75 6/4/2025
Mallorn Dr Rowan Dr Dead End 36 44,166. 89 6/6/2025
Maple Dr Poplar Dr Pacific Grove Dr 40 22,680. 88 6/6/2025 Mareblu Pacific Park Dead End 38 21,470. 69 6/12/2025
Mayflower Shore Cliff Dead End 36 16,406. 58 5/29/2025
Meadow Point Skygate Diamondgate 40 19,440. 75 9/2/2025 Merlin Ave Surfbird Ln Moorhen Ln 34 56,788. 85 6/4/2025 Mesa Cr Lyon Ridge End 36 9,360. 93 5/30/2025
Midnight Ct Dawn Ln Dead End 36 6,938. 75 6/11/2025
Monstad St Pursuit Grindlay Pl 40 40,610. 88 5/30/2025
Monstad St Monstad St End 70 6,010. 74 9/2/2025
Moorhen Ln Westwing Mallard Dr 36 14,112. 82 6/4/2025
Morning Ridge Alicia Pkwy Creekside 40 22,440. 79 6/30/2025 Morning Ridge Creekside Woodside 40 45,040. 83 6/30/2025 Myrtle Dr Pacific Park Dr Poplar Dr 40 4,240. 91 6/6/2025 Nantais Pierremont Dead End 36 10,754. 80 6/2/2025
Northern Pine Loop Ponderosa Ponderosa 36 76,032. 84 6/2/2025 Northwinds Westwing Dead End 35 25,680. 84 5/28/2025
Nutcracker Ln Cuervo Dr Dead End 39 17,579. 89 5/28/2025 Oak Ridge Cir Northern Pine Dead End 36 7,838. 80 6/2/2025 Oakgrove Dr Wood Canyon Dr Pleasant Walk 40 53,480. 85 6/6/2025 Oakleigh Eastwing Brooktree 30 12,420. 73 5/29/2025
Oakview Dr Endless Vista Gate 40 80,370. 93 6/30/2025
Oakview Dr Wood Canyon Dr Crimson Canyon 40 37,600. 94 6/30/2025 Oakview Dr Crimson Canyon Endless Vista 40 59,440. 93 6/30/2025 Orion Liberty End 45 20,115. 87 7/1/2025
Osprey Ave Surfbird Ln Dead End 37 11,018. 72 5/29/2025 Pacific Grove Dr Oakgrove Dr Maple Dr 40 21,120. 91 6/6/2025 Pacific Grove Dr Oakgrove Dr Mallorn Dr 40 4,240. 87 6/6/2025 Palm Harbor Cayman Brac Cape Coral 36 10,512. 87 6/2/2025 Paradise Bay Chase Cayman Brac 36 5,184. 91 6/2/2025
Parisville Grand Dead End 36 15,578. 87 6/2/2025
Park Ave Cedarbrook Dead End 40 26,160. 93 6/30/2025
Parkwood Eastwind Dead End 36 29,762. 93 5/30/2025
Pathfinder Saddleridge Eaglepoint 36 9,504. 80 5/29/2025 Peacock Ct Moorhen Ln Dead end 36 10,754. 85 6/4/2025
Peppertree Sprucewood End 40 42,690. 82 6/12/2025
Peppertree Pacific Park Dr Sprucewood 40 46,360. 91 6/12/2025 Pheasant Ln Westwing Dead End 36 35,450. 89 5/28/2025
Phoebe Ct Royal Tern Dead End 30 10,430. 58 9/2/2025
Appendix B ‐ Local Streets
5 of 8 139
Appendix B
Complete Street Listing Current Conditions
Local Streets
Street Name From To Width of Segment Area (SF) Current PCI Most Recent Inspection Date Picket Ln Wood Canyon Plateau 36 5,098. 91 6/2/2025
Pierremont Parisville Dead end 36 33,950. 80 6/2/2025
Pinyon Jay Wigeon Ln Bob White 39 8,034. 79 5/29/2025
Plateau Picket Ln South End 36 17,154. 89 6/2/2025
Plateau North End Picket Ln 36 49,562. 88 6/2/2025
Plateau Wood Canyon Plateau 36 5,076. 93 6/2/2025
Ponderosa St Sanborn Northern Pine 40 5,160. 88 6/2/2025 Poplar Dr Maple Dr Beech Dr 40 21,120. 89 6/6/2025
Prairie Falcon Crane St Dead End 40 34,320. 78 5/22/2025 Prairie Falcon Egret Ln Crane St 40 48,920. 76 5/22/2025 Pursuit Lyon Ridge Aliso Creek Rd 45 71,100. 89 5/30/2025 Pursuit Rue Du Chateau Lyon Ridge 45 69,210. 85 5/30/2025 Pursuit Liberty Rue Du Chateau 45 40,050. 90 5/30/2025
Ramblewood Shorecliff Westwing 34 19,456. 80 5/29/2025
Raven Ln Skylark Dr Dead End 36 54,800. 80 6/4/2025
Richmont Wy Caledon Ct Kara Ct 36 19,224. 87 6/2/2025
Ridgecrest Oakleigh Shorecliff 30 47,520. 82 5/29/2025
Rock Rose Canyon Vistas Peppertee 36 74,628. 79 6/12/2025 Rosy Finch Ln Westwing Dead End 36 35,894. 89 5/29/2025 Rowan Dr Mallorn Birch 36 14,004. 93 6/6/2025
Royal Tern Ln Dead End Phoebe 36 35,558. 65 9/2/2025
Saddleridge Highpoint Dead End 36 40,742. 80 6/16/2025
Sagebrush Timberland Canyon Vistas 40 12,400. 90 6/12/2025 San Bittern Ln Hummingbird Ln Dead End 36 30,962. 51 5/23/2025 Sanborn Chase Aurora 36 42,804. 81 7/2/2025
Sanborn Aurora Wood Canyon Dr 36 35,824. 82 7/2/2025
Sandbridge Highpoint Heatherwood 40 46,760. 82 5/29/2025 Sanderling Ln Falcon Crest Ln Hummingbird Ln 36 20,484. 65 5/22/2025 Satinbush Collingwood Dead End 36 6,326. 83 5/28/2025
Scrub Oak Silkwood Dead End 36 17,558. 74 6/2/2025
Seagull Ln Surfbird Ln Canyon Wren Ln 40 37,320. 80 5/29/2025 Sequoia Dr Pacific Grove Dr Beech Dr 36 26,208. 93 6/6/2025 Seton Dr Brookstone Pl Sunbury Dr 36 11,160. 88 6/4/2025 Sherwood Dr Deerborn Dr Sunbury Dr 36 19,008. 89 6/4/2025 Shining Star Wy Gatewood Dr End 36 4,922. 86 6/6/2025
Shorecliff Ridgecrest Dead End 30 56,690. 78 9/2/2025
Sierra Cir Northern Pine Dead End 31 6,985. 78 6/2/2025 Silkwood Canyon Vistas Dead End 36 44,666. 86 6/2/2025
Skygate Westwing Meadow Point 40 42,240. 75 5/23/2025
Skylark Dr Larkspur Dr Eastwing 40 46,520. 86 6/4/2025
Appendix B ‐ Local Streets
6 of 8 140
Appendix B
Complete Street Listing Current Conditions
Local Streets
Street Name From To Width of Segment Area (SF) Current PCI Most Recent Inspection Date Solitaire Ln Seagull Ln Dead End 36 38,690. 89 5/29/2025 Somerset Dr Sunbury Dr Brookstone Pl 36 9,504. 77 6/4/2025 Songbird Ln Trumpeter Ln Firecrest Ln 36 47,520. 65 5/23/2025 Sora Ct Westwing Dead End 36 3,478. 91 5/29/2025
Southern Hills Dr Bel Flora Ct Dead End 40 40,290. 88 6/11/2025 Spicewood Eastwind Dead End 36 30,590. 91 5/30/2025
Spoonbill Dr Surfbird Ln Lakespur Dr 40 21,120. 81 6/4/2025 Springdale Summerfield Dead End 27 11,016. 82 6/30/2025 Sprucewood Canyon Vistas Peppertree 36 87,108. 84 6/12/2025 Starling Ln Hummingbird Ln Dead End 36 25,951. 66 5/23/2025 Stockbridge Boundary Oak Cranwell 35 22,855. 87 5/30/2025 Stone Pine Hopseed Dead End 36 29,762. 86 6/11/2025
Stonebrook Westwing Dead End 36 20,258. 82 5/29/2025
Style Dr Style Dr End 56 3,528. 89 6/6/2025
Style Dr Gatewood Dr Dead End 36 17,510. 91 6/6/2025
Sugar Gum Hollyleaf Dead End 36 13,310. 87 6/2/2025
Sugarbush Bottlebrush Dead End 28 18,890. 90 6/2/2025
Summerfield Autumnglen Aliso Creek 40 61,720. 86 6/30/2025 Sunbury Dr Sherwood Dr Calypso St 36 22,248. 86 6/4/2025 Surfbird Ln Seagull Ln Dead End 37 26,040. 77 5/29/2025 Surfbird Ln Spoonbill Dr Seagull Ln 37 45,657. 82 5/29/2025 Swan Ln Surfbird Ln Dead End 36 14,510. 85 6/4/2025
Tanager Ln El Toro Rd Dead End 36 17,122. 84 6/11/2025
Tanglewood Westwing Dead End 36 38,990. 85 5/28/2025
Thornbird Briarcliff Dead End 36 20,546. 76 5/28/2025
Timberbluff Ramblewood Dead End 36 10,862. 81 5/29/2025 Timberland Peppertree Dead End 36 84,228. 84 6/12/2025
Trumpeter Ln Woodswallow Ln Songbird Ln 36 9,504. 73 9/2/2025 Via Iglesia Calle Cortez Moulton Pkwy 40 78,000. 69 5/28/2025 Via Iglesia Calle Cortez Moulton Pkwy 40 57,000. 72 5/28/2025 Walnut Dr Mallorn Dr End 36 10,954. 82 6/6/2025
Westridge Dr Oakview Dr Wood Canyon Dr 40 34,480. 80 7/2/2025 Westwing Calle Corta Aliso Creek 40 71,360. 79 6/11/2025 Westwing Aliso Creek Ramblewood 40 101,770. 84 5/29/2025 White Pelican Ln Blue Heron Ln Dead End 36 10,898. 74 9/2/2025 Wigeon Ln Cuervo Dr Pinyon Jay 39 10,296. 85 5/29/2025
Willet Ln Hummingbird Ln Royal Turn Ln 36 8,352. 66 5/22/2025 Windflower Eastwind Dead End 36 29,762. 87 5/30/2025
Windsong Aliso Creek (West) Dead End 44 22,546. 81 6/30/2025 Windsong Aliso Creek (East) Cedarbrook 40 56,000. 91 6/30/2025 Windstar Flintstone Dead End 30 4,100. 79 5/29/2025
Appendix B ‐ Local Streets
7 of 8 141
Appendix B
Complete Street Listing Current Conditions
Local Streets
Street Name From To Width of Segment Area (SF) Current PCI Most Recent Inspection Date Wolverine Way Aliso Creek Sandcastle 36 34,194. 92 7/1/2025 Wolverine Way Sandcastle CDS 36 38,304. 88 7/1/2025
Wood Canyon Dr Grand Alastair 43 58,222. 81 7/2/2025
Wood Canyon Dr Sanborn Grand 43 30,179. 85 7/2/2025
Wood Canyon Dr Pacific Park Dr Sanborn 43 57,878. 75 7/2/2025 Wood Canyon Dr Alastair Thistledown 43 23,306. 79 7/2/2025 Wood Vista Wy Hopseed Canyon Vista 40 45,440. 82 6/12/2025 Woodfield Pacific Park Dead End 28 19,312. 79 6/30/2025 Woodside Morning Ridge Creekside 40 32,130. 87 6/30/2025 Woodstork Ln Skylark Dr Bluejay Dr 36 9,464. 90 6/4/2025 Woodswallow Ln Trumpeter Ln Firecrest Ln 36 47,520. 50 5/23/2025 Appendix B ‐ Local Streets
8 of 8 142
Pavement Management Plan Local Jurisdiction Submittal
Page | 14
XIII. Appendix C – GIS Digital Data
Introduction
The OCTA GIS Section maintains a spatial inventory of transportation infrastructure which mostly consists of major arterial streets, roads, and highways. A key component of road information is pavement condition.
Maintaining an inventory of pavement condition will enhance OCTA’s GIS visualization and analysis capabilities and assist in understanding the transportation investment needs throughout the region. Therefore, a GIS dataset in digital format should be included in this report.
If the agency is unable to provide pavement data in the requested GIS format, a request for exception must be submitted by the agency. When requesting an exception, the agency must provide a letter signed by the Public Works Director with an explanation an d a timeline of when the agency will have the capabilities of providing pavement data in the required GIS digital format.
Structure of GIS Data
The GIS dataset must consist of linear or polygon geographic features that represent road/street segments. All segments that are part of the report should be included in the GIS dataset. The attribute information of each segment should generally follow the format of the Complete Listing of Current Street Conditions in Appendix B above.
The GIS data requirements are discussed below. Most commercial and open -source GIS software provide industry-standard tools to manage GIS data to meet these requirements.
GIS Digital Data Format
The GIS data must be submitted in either one of the following formats:
• Esri Shapefile, or
• Esri File Geodatabase
Metadata
The GIS data are required to have associated metadata. The minimum metadata items required are:
• Title of Dataset
• Tags (A set of words that can be used by GIS to search for the resource. For example: “pavement”, “transportation”, “roads”)
• Summary (A brief purpose statement of the dataset)
• Description (A brief narrative of the dataset’s content) • Credits (A recognition of those who created or contributed to the resource)
143
Pavement Management Plan Local Jurisdiction Submittal
Page | 15
Spatial Geometry Type
The spatial geometry of the segment features should be lines that represent the roadway centerline as accurately as possible. Polygon features may be provided if they are the only spatial features available. If polygons are provided, they must spatially represent the paved surface of roadway segments.
Projection
The GIS data must have spatial reference information and have its coordinate system identified and embedded in or associated with the data file(s). All GIS data submitted to OCTA should be in the following projected coordinate system:
• NAD 1983 State Plane California VI FIPS 0406 (US Feet) - More information about this system can be found at: https://spatialreference.org/ref/epsg/nad83-california-zone-6-ftus/ GIS Feature Attributes
The required segment attributes are:
• Street name
• Unique segment identifier (Segment ID from original source if available) • Name of intersecting road at the beginning of a segment • Name of intersecting road at the end of the segment
• Current pavement condition index (PCI)
• Current PCI inspection date
• Length of road segment in feet
• Width of road segment in feet
• Paved area of road segment in square feet or square yards • Projected PCI at end of Seven-Year Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Plan Additional attributes such as number of through travel lanes, direction of travel and pavement surface type may be provided. An example of a GIS attribute table for road segments is shown below (Note that there are additional attributes such as surface, functional class, and number of travel lanes).
144
Pavement Management Plan Local Jurisdiction Submittal
Page | 16
XIV. Appendix D – Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan Introduction
When performing data collection in any field, the need for quality control is paramount as it is essential for accurate planning, analysis and design. This is particularly true for collecting pavement distress data for a pavement management system.
The Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Plan establishes minimum quality standards for performance and procedures for updates of the pavement management system.
If applicable, utilize the space below to include information on the agency’s QA/QC policies:
Click here to enter text.
Objectives
This document constitutes a formal QA/QC Plan for the City of Aliso Viejo . It was prepared on 3/31/2026 and last revised on 5/22/2026.
Specifically, it is intended for the 2026 Pavement Management Plan Update. The focus is on the collection of network-level pavement distress data (defined by National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Synthesis 401 Quality Management of Pavement Data Collection, as “Network -level data c ollection involves collection of large quantities of pavement condition data, which is often converted to individual condition indices or aggregated into composite condition indices.”)
This document also addresses the QA/QC plan requirements of the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA)’s “Countywide Pavement Management Plan Guidelines” (section 2.4), adopted in May 2010.
Structure of QA/QC Plan
The following components are addressed in this QA/QC Plan:
• Condition survey procedures used
• Accuracy required for data collection
• Inspector qualifications and experience
• Safety
145
Pavement Management Plan Local Jurisdiction Submittal
Page | 17
Condition Survey Procedures
The governing document in performing condition surveys for the City of Aliso Viejo is ASTM D6433 “Standard Practice for Roads and Parking Lots Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Surveys.” Both asphalt concrete (AC) and Portland cement concrete (PCC) pavements are included in this protocol. The following distresses are collected for each pavement type.
Asphalt Concrete AC Pavements
1. Alligator (fatigue) cracking
2. Bleeding
3. Block cracking
4. Bumps and sags
5. Corrugation
6. Depression
7. Edge cracking
8. Joint reflection cracking
9. Lane/Shoulder drop off
10. Longitudinal & Transverse cracking
11. Patching and utility cut patching
12. Polished aggregate
13. Potholes
14. Railroad crossing
15. Rutting
16. Shoving
17. Slippage cracking
18. Swell
19. Weathering
20. Raveling
Portland Cement Concrete (Jointed)
1. Blowup/buckling
2. Corner breaks
3. Divided slab
4. Durability (“D”) cracking
5. Faulting
6. Joint seal damage
7. Lane/shoulder drop off
8. Linear cracking
9. Patching (large) and utility cuts
10. Patching (small)
11. Polished aggregate
12. Popouts
13. Pumping
14. Punchout
15. Railroad crossing
16. Scaling, map cracking and crazing
17. Shrinkage cracks
18. Spalling (corner)
19. Spalling (joint)
Any exceptions to the above procedures are discussed before any surveys are performed. They are documented in the paragraphs below.
[Note to agency: these are usually related to distresses or situations that are not covered in the manuals.
Examples include roller check marks or edge cracking on streets with no curbs and gutters. Others include the raveling of surface seals or the use o f open-graded asphalt concrete mixes where the surface appears to have large voids present. Any modifications must be documented and included in this document. Photos are extremely helpful.]
All surveys are performed as walking surveys, and a minimum 10% sampling rate is utilized. Field crews typically consist of one person, with additional personnel assigned when surveying streets with high traffic volumes. The safety of field personnel is paramount in all instances. 146
Pavement Management Plan Local Jurisdiction Submittal
Page | 18
The sample unit selected must be representative of the entire pavement section. This assumes that the section is homogenous; if it is not homogeneous, then the section must be split according to the criteria agreed upon by the agency. Typically, the criteria used are:
• Pavement condition
• Construction age, if known
• Maintenance history, if known
• Traffic volumes (or functional classification as a surrogate) • Surface types (e.g. asphalt concrete or Portland cement concrete) • Geometric elements (e.g. widths)
Any modifications to the section inventory data are documented in the pavement management report.
A sample unit must be between 2,500 ± 1,000 square feet in conformance with ASTM D6433 protocols. Typical sample unit dimensions are 100 feet long by the width of the street. Streets that are wider than 40 feet wide will have shorter lengths (generally 50 feet) or if they are divided by a raised median, separate sample units will be taken in each direction.
Any pavement areas that are not representative of the section will be noted and surveyed as an additional sample unit.
Accuracy Required for Data Collection
The accuracy required for data collection has two components, both of which are further described in the following paragraphs.
• Re-inspections
• PCI comparisons with past surveys
Random and Systematic Re-Inspections
Random Re-inspections
Random re-inspections will include a representative selection across the following categories:
• Functional classes (i.e. MPAH, locals);
• Surface types (e.g. asphalt concrete or Portland cement concrete); • Pavement conditions (e.g. good, fair, poor);
• Inspectors;
• Geographical areas, if applicable.
Systematic Re-inspections
For systematic re-inspections, this could be due to noticed trends such as specific treatment types (e.g. open - graded mixes), a specific inspector or geographical area. In such cases, more than 5% will be re-inspected.
147
Pavement Management Plan Local Jurisdiction Submittal
Page | 19
Acceptability Criteria
At the time of re-inspection, the actual distresses will be re-inspected and verified, and any corrections made, if necessary. Distress types and severities must be the same and re-measured quantities within ±10% of the original measured quantity.
If corrections are required on more than 10% of the re-inspected sample unit, then an additional 5% will be re- inspected. This will continue until more than 95% of the re-inspected sections meet the acceptability criteria.
PCI Comparison with Past Surveys
As another level of quality control, the new PCIs are compared with the previous PCIs. If they differ by more than ±10 PCI points, these sections are automatically flagged for further investigation.
If PCI Increases 10 points
The section is investigated to see if a maintenance and rehabilitation event has occurred since the last survey, but has not been recorded. Typically, it may include activities such as:
• Crack sealing activities – changes medium or high severity cracking to low severity • Patching activities – alligator cracking that has been removed and patched, so that the resultant PCI is increased.
• Surface seals
• Overlay
• Others
Therefore, an up to date maintenance and rehabilitation history file in the pavement management database is desirable, both for historical accuracy as well as to provide additional quality control.
If PCI decreases 10 points
The section is checked to see if the average deterioration rate (usually 3 to 4 points per year) is exceeded. If the drop in PCI is within range of what is acceptable, no further action is required. If the drop is more than the acceptable range, a re -inspection will be performed. The default performance curves in the pavement management software form the basis for what is acceptable.
148
Pavement Management Plan Local Jurisdiction Submittal
Page | 20
Inspector’s Qualifications and Experience
The GMU personnel involved in pavement condition data collection and analysis for this project —regardless of survey method (walking, windshield, semi-automated, or fully automated)—are strongly recommended to attend formal ASTM D6433 distress training through eith er the annual OCTA training program or an internal training program.
Critical Requirement: All PCI results submitted as part of this project must be reviewed and signed by at least one inspector holding an active OCTA Pre-Qualification certificate. Reports that are not reviewed and signed by an OCTA pre-qualified inspector will not be accepted by OCTA. Local jurisdictions will be required to submit a revised report prepared by an OCTA pre-qualified inspector.
The table below identifies all project personnel involved in field data collection and QA/QC review, including their training credentials and OCTA Pre-Qualification status.
Inspector Name Role
(Field Inspector or
QA/QC Reviewer or
Both)
Date of ASTM
D6433
Training
Training
Conducted By:
OCTA Pre-Qualification
Active
(Y/N)
Expiration
Date
Certificate
Provided
with this
Report
(Y/N)
Amina Mannan QA/QC Reviewer July 2024 GMU and OCTA Y 07/30/2026 Y Mahmoud Khadem Both July 2024 GMU and OCTA Y 07/30/2026 Y Joseph Huynh Both August 2024 GMU and OCTA Y 06/30/2028 Y Rasheed Bilal Field Inspector April 2025 GMU and OCTA Y 06/30/2028 Y
Resumes of the technicians utilized on this project are included as an attachment.
149
Pavement Management Plan Local Jurisdiction Submittal
Page | 21
Safety Procedures
The GMU administers a health and safety program in compliance with the Cal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Title VIII, Section 3203. The program is documented in GMU’s Workplace Safety Manual.
Generally, the safety procedures include (Edit as applicable to agency):
• Inspectors to wear Class 2 or 3 safety vest at all times; • Flashing beacon on all vehicles utilized for surveys; and • Stopped vehicles to be parked at locations away from moving traffic (e.g. nearby parking, shoulders, etc.).
• Inspectors to survey the street from the curb or shoulder, especially when Arterials are being surveyed.
On streets where there is a high volume of traffic or high speeds, additional measures may be necessary, such as:
• Surveys to occur during off-peak periods or on weekends; • Additional inspector to watch out for traffic; and
• Traffic flaggers in extreme cases.
Attachments
A. Certificate of Prequalification – OCTA Pavement Inspector Prequalification Program B. Resumes of Field Inspectors
---End of QA/QC Plan---
150
CERTIFICATE
Amina Mannan
This certificate has been
presented to
for successfully meeting the requirements of the
OCTA 2024 Pavement Inspector Prequalification Program
using MANUAL survey techniques
Expiration:
7.30.2026
www.WestCoastEC.com/OCTA
Of Prequalification
151
CERTIFICATE
Mahmoud Khadem
This certificate has been
presented to
for successfully meeting the requirements of the
OCTA 2024 Pavement Inspector Prequalification Program
using MANUAL survey techniques
Expiration:
7.30.2026
www.WestCoastEC.com/OCTA
Of Prequalification
152
CERTIFICATE
Joseph Huynh
This certificate has been
presented to
for successfully meeting the requirements of the
OCTA 2026 Pavement Inspector Prequalification Program
using MANUAL survey techniques
Expiration:
6.30.2028
www.WestCoastEC.com/OCTA
Of Prequalification
153
CERTIFICATE
Rasheed Bilal
This certificate has been
presented to
for successfully meeting the requirements of the
OCTA 2026 Pavement Inspector Prequalification Program
using MANUAL survey techniques
Expiration:
6.30.2028
www.WestCoastEC.com/OCTA
Of Prequalification
154
30336 Esperanza, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688 | ph: 330.622.0916 | fax: 949.888.1380 | web: www.gmugeo.com Amina Mannan, Ph.D., P.E.
Senior Engineer, Pavement & Geotechnical Engineering
PROFESSION
Civil Engineer
REGISTRATION
Registered Civil Engineer (C98114)
State of California
EDUCATION
Ph.D. Civil Engineering
University of New Mexico,
Albuquerque
M.S. Civil Engineering
University of Akron, Akron, OH
B.S. Civil Engineering
Bangladesh University of Engineering
and Technology, Dhaka Bangladesh
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
GMU Geotechnical, Inc., RSM, CA
(2023 – Present)
Senior Engineer
Arias & Associates, Inc. San Antonio, TX
(2018 – 2023)
Senior Pavement & Geotechnical
Engineer
Applied Research Associates Inc.,
Gainesville, FL
(Feb 2018 – Sept 2018)
Pavement Condition Consultant for
FDOT
University of New Mexico, Albuquerque,
NM
(2012 – 2017)
Graduate Researcher
University of Akron, Akron, OH
(2010 – 2012)
Graduate Researcher
AFFILIATIONS
American Society of Civil Engineer
(ASCE)
PUBLICATIONS
Author of over 40 journal and
conference publications in pavement
materials and engineering
Amina is a highly experienced senior pavement and
geotechnical engineer with 15 years of experience in
pavement engineering and 5 years of experience in
geotechnical engineering projects. Her expertise
includes pavement condition assessment, material
testing, pavement evaluation/design, pavement
condition index, specification development, and mix
design development projects. In addition, she has
experience in geotechnical engineering, such as site
investigation, geotechnical analysis and design,
foundation design, slope stability analysis, construction monitoring, and risk assessment. Amina has had the
privilege of collaborating with state and local agencies, private sector clients, and civil engineering firms, and has previously worked with several state agencies
(e.g., NMDOT, FDOT, and TxDOT) on pavement and
geotechnical projects. Her unique proficiency in both
pavement and geotechnical engineering enables her to
provide her clients with high-quality, cost-effective, and reliable solutions.
• Advanced Non-Destructive Testing: Proficiency in
utilizing non-destructive testing methodologies such
as Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD), Ground
Penetrating Radar (GPR), Laser Crack Measurement
System (LCMS), and Profiler, for comprehensive
pavement condition assessments.
• Pavement Evaluation and Design: Demonstrated
expertise in employing various design methos,
including Caltrans, Greenbook, AASHTO’93, FAA,
AASHTOWare Pavement ME for the evaluation and
design of pavements.
• Pavement Management Plans (PMP): Experience in
formulating PMP using the Pavement Condition Index
(PCI), budget analysis and Maintenance and
Rehabilitation (M&R) planning using PAVER.
• Asphalt Mix Designs: Proficiency in designing
asphalt mixes, encompassing hot-mix asphalt (HMA)
and warm-mix asphalt (WMA) with and without RAP,
in accordance with Superpave mix design method.
• Geotechnical Data and Design
Recommendations: Expertise in providing
geotechnical data and design recommendations for
utilities, retaining walls, and bridges based on the in- situ lab testing of soil and rock.
• AC Laboratory Testing : Experience in laboratory
testing, including Dynamic Modulus Test, Low-
Temperature Cracking Test, Beam Fatigue Test,
Hamburg Wheel Tracking (HWT) Test, Moisture
Induced Sensitivity Test (MIST), and more.
• Asphalt Binder Testing : Experience in binder
testing, including Dynamic Shear Rheometer (DSR),
Dynamic Mechanical Analyzer (DMA), Bending Beam
Rheometers (BBR), Rotational Viscometer (RV), etc.
155
Amina Mannan 2
Select Pavement Management Plan (PMP) Projects
City of Newport Beach, Citywide Pavement Management Plan Updates for 2023 , 2025:
Managed the on-going, citywide pavement management plan study consisting of 205 centerline miles of streets to comply with OCTA Measure M2 funding requirements.
City of Laguna Niguel, CA, Citywide Pavement Management Plan Updates, 2020 to 2026 :
Pavement condition index (PCI) assessment of all city-maintained streets consisting of a total of approximately 141.5 centerline miles of streets and budget scenario analysis to help optimize the City’s pavement maintenance and rehabilitation schedule and budget (approximately $2.1M per year typically).
City of Aliso Viejo CA, Citywide Pavement Management Plan Updates, 2025 to 2028 :
Pavement condition index (PCI) assessment of all city-maintained streets consisting of a total of approximately 72.2 centerline miles of streets and budget scenario analysis to help optimize the City’s pavement maintenance and rehabilitation schedule and budget (approximately $1.75M per year typically).
City of San Fernando, 2024 Citywide Pavement Management Plan Update: Managed the City’s pavement management plan study consisting of 50 centerline miles of streets to comply with Los Angeles County Transportation Authority (METRO) pavement management requirements.
City of Hermosa Beach, 2024 Citywide Pavement Management Plan Update: Managed the City’s pavement management plan study consisting of 48 centerline miles of streets to comply with Los Angeles County Transportation Authority (METRO) pavement management requirements.
Groves at Orchard Hills Homeowners Association, Pavement Management Plan Update 2024, Irvine, CA: Updated the pavement management inventory and performed pavement management plan updates in 2024.
Casta Del Sol Community Association, Pavement Management Plan Update 2024, Mission Viejo, CA: Updated the pavement management system for approximately 22 centerline miles of streets managed by the HOA with a yearly street improvement budget of approximately $1.2M to $2.2M per year. Performing periodic reviews and updates to the community’s pavement management plan each year.
Canyon Lake Property Owners Association, Pavement Management Plan Update 2024, Canyon Lake, CA: Updated the pavement management system for approximately 37 centerline miles of streets managed by the HOA with a yearly street improvement budget of approximately $3M per year.
Oasis Palm Desert Homeowners Association Pavement Management Plan, 2023, Palm Desert, CA: Creating the HOA’s street network inventory, performing walking pavement condition assessment of the HOA streets, reviewing previous Maintenance and Rehabilitation (M&R) activities, performing various budget scenarios analysis, and recommending Maintenance and Rehabilitation (M&R) treatments for the next 5 years.
156
30336 Esperanza, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688 | ph: 949.888.6513 | fax: 949.888.1380 | web: www.gmugeo.com
MAHMOUD KHADEM, M.SC., E.I.T
Senior Staff Pavement Engineer
PROFESSION
Civil Engineer
EDUCATION
M.S. Civil Engineering
(Pavement/Materials
Engineering) University of
Nevada, Reno
M.S. Civil Engineering
(Structural Engineering)
University of Balamand,
Koura, Lebanon
B.Sc. Civil Engineering
University of Balamand,
Koura, Lebanon
CERTIFICATIONS
Engineer In Training (E.I.T)
OCTA Pavement Inspector
PROFESSIONAL
AFFILIATIONS
American Concrete Institute
(ACI)
American Society of Civil
Engineers (ASCE)
Mahmoud has been involved in a wide variety of
projects that are related to pavement designs,
laboratory testing, data analysis, pavement
rehabilitation, and preservation. Mahmoud’s current
work includes supporting a wide range of pavement
construction projects for multiple Cities and private
communities, and pavement engineering projects,
including pavement evaluations, pavement field
explorations, proposals, cost estimates preparation,
and network-level pavement management plans. His
work also extends to developing different project
maps using AutoCAD and ESRI ArcGIS.
Mahmoud’s experience in pavement management,
evaluation, design, and construction includes:
• Pavement Management Plans (PMP) for
local Cities and HOAs
• Budget analysis and Maintenance and
Rehabilitation (M&R) planning using PAVER
• Developing Plans, Specifications, and
Engineering Estimates (PS&E) for
pavement-related projects
• Pavement Condition Index (PCI)
calculations and analysis
• Non-destructive testing, including deflection
testing & ground-penetrating radar (GPR)
testing
• SuperPave and Hveem Asphalt Mix
designs.
• Pavement Design using Caltrans, AASHTO
1993, and Pavement ME methods
• Construction inspection, observation, and
testing
• SuperPave Asphalt Binder Testing and
Asphalt Mixture Performance Testing
• Pavement-related software: 3D-Move,
WESLEA, PAVEXpress, ILLI-PAVE,
AASHTOware Pavement ME Design,
MODULUS
157
30336 Esperanza, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688 | ph: 949.888.6513 | fax: 949.888.1380 | web: www.gmugeo.com
Joseph Huynh, MSc, EIT
Senior Staff Geotechnical Engineer
PROFESSION
Geotechnical Engineer
Civil Engineer
CERTIFICATIONS
Engineer-in-training (EIT)
OCTA Pavement Inspector
EDUCATION
M.S., Civil Engineering –
Geotechnical Emphasis,
California State Polytechnic
University, Pomona
B.S., Civil Engineering,
California State Polytechnic
University, Pomona
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
GMU Geotechnical, Inc.
(September 2023 – Present)
Senior Staff Geotechnical Engineer
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA
A3GEO, Inc.
(October 2021 – September 2023)
Senior Staff Engineer
Berkeley, CA
Converse Consultants
(February 2020 – October 2021)
Staff Engineer
Redlands, CA
Giles Engineering Associates, Inc.
(July 2016 – November 2019)
Engineering Technician
Orange, CA
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
American Society of Civil Engineers
(ASCE)
HONORS AND AWARDS
Cal Poly Pomona President’s Scholar,
2019-2020
ASCE, Orange County Branch
Outstanding Civil Engineer in
Community Services 2021
SUMMARY OF PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
Joseph has over 10 years of experience in the pavement and geotechnical engineering industry ranging from field and laboratory experience to staff and senior engineering tasks. His areas of expertise include:
• Site and subsurface investigations and sampling
• Field Data Collection using Manual and Semi-Automated surveys
• Pavement Condition Index (PCI) calculations and analysis • Non-destructive testing, including deflection testing & ground-penetrating radar (GPR) testing
• Laboratory data QA/QC
• Project research and documentation
• Project engineering support
• Geotechnical report preparation
• Coordination and performance of construction materials testing
• Documenting, researching, reviewing, and responding to contractor submittals and RFI’s
• Accreditation in 16 Caltrans test methods
• Technician oversight
• Use of computer aided design software, AutoCad, Finite Element Analysis, and Microstation
Major projects on which Joseph has served as an engineer include:
• Construction of an earthen embankment flood control
structure with the United States Army Corp of Engineers for River Road Dike, Eastvale, CA
• Construction inspection of SR-91 Widening, Corona, CA • Construction inspection of Hamner Avenue Bridge, Norco, CA
• Construction inspection of SR-60 Truck Climbing Lane, Beaumont, CA
• Pavement Management Plans for City of Newport Beach,
City of Hermosa Beach, City of Aliso Viejo, City of Laguna Niguel, and City of San Fernando Valley, CA
158
30336 Esperanza, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688 | ph: 949.888.6513 | fax: 949.888.1380 | web: www.gmugeo.com RASHEED BILAL, B.SC.
Staff Pavement Engineer
PROFESSION
Civil Engineer
E
DUCATION
B.Sc. Civil Engineering
U
niversity of Chico State,
Ch
ico, California
CE
RTIFICATIONS
OCTA Pavement Inspector
PR
OFESSIONAL
AFFILIATIONS
American Society of Civil
Engineers (ASCE)
Rasheed has been involved in a wide variety of
projects that are related to pavement design, data
analysis, and range from field and laboratory
experience. Rasheed’s current work includes
supporting a range of pavement construction projects
for multiple Cities and private communities ,
conducting pavement evaluations and field
explorations, proposals, BID packages, and cost
estimate preparation. Rasheed has extensive
experience conducting pavement investigations
including new road construction, full-depth
reclamation, mill and overlay, subgrade stabilization,
and production plant inspections.
R
asheed’s field responsibilities include maintaining
detailed reports, sampling construction materials, and
performing quality control and quality acceptance
testing. Rasheed monitors general paving methods to
establish compliance with Caltrans and Greenbook
standards. His role requires regular interaction with
paving contractors and city engineers to oversee
project execution, address challenges, and contribute
to high-quality roadway infrastructure.
Rasheed’s experience in pavement management,
evaluation, design, and construction includes:
• P
avement Management Plans (PMP) for
local Cities and HOAs
• Site and subsurface investigations and
s
ampling
• F
ield Data Collections using Manual and
Se
mi-Automated surveys
• Pavement Condition Index (PCI)
calculations and analysis
• Construction inspection, observation, and
t
esting
• C
oordination and performance of
construction materials testing
• T
echnician oversight
• Accreditation in Caltrans test methods
159
Pavement Management Plan Local Jurisdiction Submittal
Page | 22
XV. Appendix E – Pavement Management Data Files
The Pavement Management data files shall be submitted to OCTA in spreadsheet format. This must include the following information:
• Street name and limits for all public streets
• Street identifiers (Branch ID, Section ID)
• Direction (if applicable)
• Beginning and ending of each section
• Length, widths, and true areas
• Functional Classification (MPAH, Local)
• Number of travel lanes
• PCI and date of inspection
• Type of recommended treatment
• Cost of recommended treatment
• Street geometry as linear or polygon features
The Pavement Management data files are submitted here as an electronic copy sent via email as an attachment, via a link to an online storage device site, such as DropBox and/or OneDrive, or USB drive , and/or included as Appendix E.
XVI. Appendix F – GIS Maps – Current Conditions (Optional) If included, attach and label Appendix F.
160
161
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-____
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALISO VIEJO
CONCERNING THE UPDATE OF THE LOCAL SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PLAN FOR THE MEASURE M (M2) PROGRAM.
WHEREAS, the Orange County Transportation Authority has developed the Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan to identify traffic signal synchronization street routes and traffic signals within and across jurisdictional boundaries, and defines the means of implementing the Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program; and
WHEREAS, the Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program requires that local jurisdictions adopt a Local Signal Synchronization Plan consistent with the Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan as a key component of local jurisdictions’ efforts to synchronizing traffic signals across local jurisdictions’ boundaries; and WHEREAS, the Local Signal Synchronization Plan must be updated by June 30, 2026 to continue to be eligible to receive Net Revenues as part of Measure M2; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council for the City of Aliso Viejo, does hereby inform OCTA that:
a) The City adopts and maintains a Local Signal Synchronization Plan which includes goals that are consistent with those outlined as part of the Regional Signal Synchronization Master Plan, including signal synchronization across jurisdictions.
b) The Local Signal Synchronization Plan identifies traffic signal synchronization street routes, including all elements of the Regional Signal Synchronization Network located within the City. c) The Local Signal Synchronization Plan includes the traffic signal inventory for all traffic s i g n a l synchronization street routes. d) The Local Signal Synchronizatio n Plan includes a three -year plan showing capital, operations, and maintenance of signal synchronization along the traffic signal synchronization street routes and traffic signals.
e) The Local Signal Synchronization Plan includes an update on the status and performance of traffic signal synchronization activities. f) The Local Signal Synchronization Plan includes a discussion on the review and revision, as may be necessary, on the timing of traffic signals on the traffic signal synchronization street routes.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 17th day of June, 2026. 162
________________________
Max Duncan
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
________________________ ________________________
Scott C. Smith Maria Kendig
City Attorney City Clerk
163
June 30, 2026
Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA)
ATTN: Alicia Yang
Regional Modeling and Traffic Operations
Planning Division
P.O. Box 14184
Orange, CA 92863-1584
Subject: Local Signal Synchronization Plan Submitta l as Part of the Measure M2 Eligibility Process
Dear Ms. Yang:
The City of Aliso Viejo is pleased to submit its up dated Local Signal Synchronization Plan as part of the Measure M2 eligibility process. The submittal includes the following components:
1. A completed “Local Signal Synchronization Plan C onsistency Review Checklist” form establishing consistency between the Local Sig nal Synchronization Plan and the Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan.
2. An updated Local Signal Synchronization Plan for Fiscal Years 2026/2027 to 2028/29 including all required elements as identifi ed in the “Guidelines for the Preparation of Local Signal Synchronization Plans”.
3. An updated GIS-based traffic signal inventory.
The City of Aliso Viejo looks forward to continuing the implementation of the beneficial programs and construction projects made possible by Measure M2. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at (949) 425-2531.
Sincerely,
Quang Le, P.E.
Associate Engineer
Enclosures:
A. Local Signal Synchronization Plan Consistency Re view Checklist B. Local Signal Synchronization Plan
164
A.
i
LOCAL SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PLAN
CONSISTENCY REVIEW CHECKLIST
The Local Agency Name: CITY OF ALISO VIEJO
Plan Date: JUNE 30, 2026
Local agencies must submit a copy of their Local Si gnal Synchronization Plan, and any supporting documentation, including the completed consistency review checklist below.
Local Agency Statement
Page #s in
LSSP
Provided
or N/A
1) Signal synchronization goals of the agency are
consistent with those outlined as part of the Regional
Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan.
PAGES
2 - 5 Provided
2) Traffic signal synchronization street routes are
identified, including all corridors along the regional signal synchronization network located within the local agency.
PAGES
6 - 8 Provided
3) Traffic signal inventory for all traffic signal
synchronization street routes.
PAGE S
9 - 11 Provided
4) Three-year plan separately showing costs, available funding, and phasing for capital, operations, and
maintenance of signal synchronization along the traffic signal synchronization street routes and traffic signals which may include unconstrained and build-out
scenarios.
PAGES
12 - 15 Provided
5) Signal synchronization review, revision, and
assessment of synchronization activities along the traffic signal synchronization street routes and traffic signals.
PAGES
16 - 22 Provided
I certify that the above statements are true to the best of my knowledge.
___________________________________________________ ________________ Signature Date
Quang Le, P.E., Associate Engineer
Printed Name, Title
165
B.