Agenda packet — American Canyon City Council, February 21, 2023 (part 19 of 20)

Findings: Less than significant cumulative impact (Draft EIR, Page 4-14). No mitigation is necessary.

Facts in Support of Findings
The geographic scope of the cumulative transportation analysis is the nine county San Francisco Bay Area region. VMT is evaluated and regulated at a regional level and, thus, the San Francisco Bay Area region is an appropriate geographical area.

Impact TRANS-1 concluded that the proposed project would not have a significant impact on the circulation system and, therefore, no mitigation would be necessary. As such, the proposed project would not have a cumulatively considerable contribution in this regard. Impact TRANS-2 concluded that the proposed project would not have a significant impact on VMT because the proposed project would have a VMT rate of 16.24, well below the regional average of 23.00. As such, the proposed project would not have a cumulatively considerable contribution to VMT.

With respect to Impact TRANS-3, the potential hazards from design features or incompatible uses are project site specific (e.g., site access, sight distance, etc.) and would not combine with other projects. The proposed project and other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects have complied and must comply with local, standard requirements for transportation-related design features specifically adopted to avoid and reduce hazards from project design or the location of incompatible uses, thereby reducing the potential for significant cumulative impacts to less than significant levels.

With respect to Impact TRANS-4, the provision of adequate emergency access is site specific and would not combine with other projects. The proposed project and other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects must comply with local, standard requirements for adequate emergency access specifically adopted to avoid or reduce the potential for inadequate access.

Furthermore, the proposed project and other projects would not have significant impacts on the 3783
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations performance of the study intersections and, therefore, it can be inferred that it would also not impair emergency response to the project vicinity.

1.5.12 - Utilities and Service Systems
Potential Effect
Impact USS-1: The proposed project would not require the City of American Canyon to obtain additional water supplies in order to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry, and multiple dry years (Draft EIR Pages 3.13-16—31).

Findings: Less than significant impact (Draft EIR Page 3.13-31). No mitigation is necessary.

Facts in Support of Findings
The analysis in the water supply assessment (WSA) shows that the City’s water supply is sufficient to meet projected demand, in all years and under all normal-, dry-, and multi-dry year scenarios. The analysis shows that demand will exceed supply during some dry years, but the City will still be able to meet demand through the use of carryover State Water Project (SWP) water or through some combination of carryover SWP water, Advanced Table A Water, demand reductions, and/or additional purchases on the open market. In addition, recycled water supply in the City is available to meet existing and projected demand and available in sufficient volume to support non-potable uses at the project site. Use of recycled water at the site will increase the City’s utilization of this supply.

Phases 1 and 2
Potable water demand for the project was estimated by CBG Engineers based on demand factors contained in the 2016 City of American Canyon Potable Water Master plan (Draft EIR, Table 3.13-3).

The average day demand of 0.015 gallons per day/square-foot used to calculate the estimates are believed to be an overly high estimate of water use for this project. To provide a more realistic estimate of potable water demand for the proposed Giovannoni Logistics Center Project, the WSA prepared for the proposed project (Draft EIR, Appendix I) averaged the demand rates of the Napa Airport Corporate Center (NACC) (0.006 gpd/square-foot), the CBG Engineers estimate (0.015 gpd/square-foot), and the Suisun Logistics Center (0.01 gpd/square-foot) (Draft EIR, Appendix B), resulting in an average day demand of 0.009 gpd/square-foot. The WSA estimates the total potable water demand of the proposed project at buildout to be 23.9 AFY (15.9 AFY less than the usage originally estimated by CBG Engineers) (Draft EIR, Table 3.13-3).

For the purposes of the WSA, all indoor water demand is assumed to be from potable water. In the future, recycled water could be used for non-potable indoor uses, further reducing potable water demand. Table 3.13-3 of the Draft EIR shows the estimated potable water demand for each building of the proposed project.

Recycled Water
The proposed project would use recycled water for all irrigation needs and for toilet flushing.

Estimated recycled water use within the project is summarized in Table 3.13-3 of the Draft EIR. The current project plans do not have estimates for the area of irrigated landscaping; thus demand was approximated by applying the average ratio of 0.604 between irrigated area and building footprint from the neighboring NACC project, with a demand factor of 2.5 acre-feet/acre (from Table 3.13 in 3784
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 36 the 2010 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP)). The irrigation demand of the proposed project may be lower if landscaping with lower-than-typical irrigation needs is used. Actual use per building may vary based on final site plans, but total use is expected to be consistent with (or less than) these assumptions (Draft EIR, Table 3.13-3).

Project Demand Comparison to Urban Water Management Plan Potable Water Demand
The proposed project is expected to use 133.3 AFY less water than expected under the 2015 UWMP growth scenario. Implementation of the City’s Zero Water Footprint Policy would result in an additional 23.9-acre-foot reduction in potable water demand relative to the UWMP systemwide demand analysis (Draft EIR, Table 3.13-4).

Recycled Water
The American Canyon UWMP assumes irrigation use to be 2.5 acre-feet of water per acre of landscaping but did not project recycled water demand associated with particular parcels anticipated for development. Because recycled water use offsets demand for potable (or raw imported) water and it is in the City’s best interest to maximize use of recycled water, the project’s recycled water demand is assessed relative to the recycled water demand goals outlined in the UWMP.

The 2016 Recycled Water Master Plan showed a delivery of 248 acre-feet for an existing 21 users between August 2013 and July 2014. In 2019, 282 acre-feet of recycled water was delivered to customers which is still below the projected 391 acre-feet of recycled water in 2020. The proposed project would add an estimated 82.1 AFY of recycled water demand.

Systemwide Demand
Recent Actual System Demand
Table 3.13-5 of the Draft EIR shows the actual water usage within the City’s distribution area since the 2015 UWMP was completed, as well as the interpolated yearly demand based on the projections in the UWMP. Since 2015, potable water demand has been much lower than that anticipated in the UWMP.

Projected System Demand
The 2015 UWMP projected future demand on a parcel-by-parcel basis relative to expected growth under the City’s general plan. The analysis assumed that recycled water would be available to meet a portion of the total demand, with the remainder supplied by potable water. Table 3.13-6 of the Draft EIR shows the water demand as presented in the 2015 UWMP.

Unbilled Water Losses
The UWMP assumed that unbilled water losses would be 7.5 percent for each year between 2020- 2040, consistent with standards adopted by the California Urban Water Conservation Council. In 2015, water delivery and water use records indicate that system losses were 22 percent. In 2015, the City replaced more than 120 segments of residential service lines as part of its program to reduce distribution system losses. The City assumed it would reduce system losses to 7.5 percent of the total potable and raw water deliveries by 2020.
3785
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations Supply and Demand Comparison
The scenarios presented herein have been summarized from the 2015 UWMP analysis for citywide system planning. This analysis addresses potable and recycled water separately.

Potable Water
The City’s potable water supply relies exclusively on imported water, both from the SWP and through the City of Vallejo. A percentage of the full contracted amount is assumed for each source type under each scenario. These percentages are based on guidance by California Department of Water Resources (DWR), analysis in the City’s UWMP and the Vallejo UWMP. The supply and demand for potable water under ‘normal year,’ ‘single dry year,’ and ‘multiple dry year’ scenarios is discussed as follows.

Normal Year
The UWMP concluded that future supply is available to meet anticipated demand in normal years through buildout in 2035, as does the analysis in the WSA (Table 8). Excess supply in normal years ranges from a low of 2,653 in 2040 to a high of 3,497 AFY in 2025 (Draft EIR, Table 3.13-9).

Single Dry Year
The 2015 UWMP shows that single dry year supply is not significantly currently constrained and the City will be able to reliably meet potable demand until the year 2030. Single dry year deficiencies are anticipated starting in 2035 (Draft EIR, Table 3.13-9). The City has several options available to resolve dry year supply deficiencies.

Multiple Dry Years
The multiple dry year scenario, as described in the UWMP, consists of three consecutive years of reduced water deliveries, though none are reduced to the same degree as the single dry year scenario. The 2015 UWMP projects that water supply will exceed demand during a 3-year drought through the full 2040 planning period (Draft EIR, Table 3.13-9).

Potable Water Deficiency Resolution
This section describes a series of options available to the City to eliminate supply shortages in several of the “dry year” and “multiple dry year” planning scenarios in order to provide reliable supply. Estimated SWP carryover water would be sufficient to eliminate dry year supply shortfalls and could also be used in combination with drought demand reductions to further improve supply reliability.

State Water Project Carryover Water
If the City does not use its entire allotment of Table A water in a given year, the remaining water will carry over to the following year, assuming there is adequate storage in SWP reservoirs to contain the excess supply. Between 2015 and 2020, the City has stored between 35 and 2,600 acre-feet of carryover water in a given year (Draft EIR, Table 3.13-10), which has helped to meet demand during recent dry years. This is not considered a consistent yearly supply for planning purposes, but it does allow the City extra flexibility during droughts. As such, the carryover water has been incorporated into the analysis in the WSA.
3786
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 38 It is assumed that 1,156 acre-feet of carryover water would be available at the beginning of a dry year and the first year of a multi-year drought. Projected excess normal year supply ranges from 2,653 to 3,497 acre-feet for 2020-2040, suggesting that 1,156 acre-feet is a reasonable and somewhat conservative estimate for planning purposes. In the second and third year of a multi-year drought, the remaining carryover supply (presuming there is any) would continue to carry over to subsequent years to supplement supplies.

Under the above assumptions, the City would be able to meet projected supply deficiencies under all dry and multiple dry year scenarios within the planning period (2015-2040) through the use of available carryover water.

Advanced Table A Program
The Advanced Table A Program allows the Napa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, the Solano County Water Agency, and Yuba City (along with subcontractors to those agencies, which includes American Canyon) to borrow against future SWP deliveries during times when annual deliveries are not sufficient to meet demand. Should all Table A and Table A carryover water be used, the City could request an advance of up to 949 acre-feet from future years’ Table A allotments. The projections in Table 3.13-11 of the Draft EIR do not rely on the use of the Advanced Table A Program water to meet dry year demand, as estimated Table A carryover is enough to cover supply deficiencies for all scenarios. However, this program provides an important tool available to the City should unforeseen circumstances result in significantly lower-than-expected carryover.

Drought Year Demand Reductions
The demand projections in the 2015 UWMP and the analysis in the WSA were not explicitly adjusted for voluntary or mandatory water use reduction measures that may be implemented in response to drought conditions. The City has a Water Shortage Contingency Plan that outlines water demand reduction measures that could be utilized when water supply is constrained.

On June 1, 2021, the City declared a Stage 1 drought emergency that called for a voluntary reduction from residential and commercial customers. On July 20, 2021, the City declared a Stage 2 drought emergency requiring all water customers to reduce their water use by 20 percent. As of the end of August 2021, water conservation measures have resulted in an 18 percent decrease from residential customers and 13 percent decrease from commercial customers.

Because estimated carryover water was sufficient to satisfy projected shortages, the supply and demand analysis in Table 3.13-11 does not account for drought year demand reduction. However, the City may choose to use these measures to provide additional flexibility during droughts.

Assuming drought reductions of 13 percent, similar to what was achieved in 2014, the City could be expected to reduce demand in future years ranging between 305 acre-feet in 2015 and 537 acre-feet in 2040 (Draft EIR, Table 3.13-12). These measures could be used in conjunction with the above measures to provide an additional buffer, as needed, if other supplies are unexpectedly curtailed.

Open Market Purchases
The City has the option to purchase additional water from a variety of other sources on an asneeded and as-available basis. These potential purchases were not considered as a reliable long3787 City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations term supply for the purposes of the WSA. Open Market Purchases can provide additional operational flexibility for the City during dry periods when other supplies are reduced.

Recycled Water
The City’s recycled water system has a supply capacity of up to 1,271 AFY by 2035, and NapaSan has agreed to provide up to 591 acre-feet to supply the northern portion of the Airport Industrial Area (which is located within the City’s water service area). Practically, however, the City produces recycled water to meet demand, as shown in Table 3.13-8. Recycled water is assumed to be 100 percent available during single- and multi-year-drought scenarios. Table 3.13-9 of the Draft EIR presents recycled water supply versus demand for the 2015-2040 planning period under various year-type scenarios.

The UWMP projected 1,862 acre-feet of recycled water use by 2035. Recent recycled water use has been much lower than projected in the UWMP. The City expects a significant expansion in the recycled water delivery system by 2035, allowing full use of the system by that time. Recycled water demand by sector is shown in Table 3.13-13 of the Draft EIR.

Potential Effect
Impact USS-2: The proposed project would not create a need for new or expanded wastewater collection or treatment facilities (Draft EIR Pages 3.13-31—32).

Findings: Less than significant impact (Draft EIR Page 3.13-32). No mitigation is necessary.

Facts in Support of Findings
Phases 1 and 2
The proposed project would be served by City of American Canyon for wastewater collection and treatment. The proposed project would connect to both an existing 12-inch diameter sewer line within Green Island Road and a future sewer line within the Devlin Road extension. Both lines convey effluent to the Green Island Road Sanitary Pump Station and ultimately the City’s Water Reclamation Facility. The proposed project would generate 402,500 gallons of effluent per day (0.41 mgd) at buildout. Phase 1 of the proposed project would generate 276,800 gallons per day (0.28 mgd) and Phase 2 would generate 125,700 gallons (0.13 mgd) (Draft EIR, Table 3.13-14).

The Water Reclamation Facility has an existing design capacity of 2.5 mgd, with a phased improvement plan outlined to increase the plant capacity over time to 4 mgd. The proposed project’s wastewater generation of 0.41 mgd would represent 16 percent of the existing treatment capacity and 10 percent of the future capacity. As such, existing and planned treatment capacity would be sufficient to serve the proposed project.

Potential Effect
Impact USS-3: The proposed project would not result in a need for new or expanded off-site storm drainage facilities (Draft EIR Pages 3.13-32—33).

Findings: Less than significant impact (Draft EIR Page 3.13-33). No mitigation is necessary. 3788
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 40 Facts in Support of Findings
The proposed project would increase the amount of impervious surface coverage on the project site and would create the potential for increased runoff leaving the project site that may create potential flooding conditions in downstream waterways.

The proposed project would provide 110,766 square feet (2.6 acres) of storm drainage retention onsite. A network of underground piping ranging from 12- to 48-inches in diameter would convey runoff to bioretention and detention basins in the northern portion of the property.

In accordance with applicable provisions of Section C.3 of the San Francisco Bay RWQCB Municipal Regional Permit (Order No. R2-2015-0049, NPDES Permit No. CAS612008) (or more recent permit) as required under Mitigation Measure (MM) HYD-1b, the proposed project would implement LID stormwater management methods into the on-site storm drainage system consisting of rainwater harvesting and use, infiltration, evapotranspiration, or biotreatment.

These measures would serve to slow, reduce, and meter the volume of runoff leaving the project site and ensure that downstream storm drainage facilities are not inundated with project-related stormwater such that new or expanded facilities would be required.

Potential Effect
Impact USS-4: The proposed project’s solid waste would not create a need for additional landfill capacity (Draft EIR Pages 3.13-33—34).

Findings: Less than significant impact (Draft EIR Page 3.13-34). No mitigation is necessary.

Facts in Support of Findings
This impact discussion assesses whether the proposed project would be served by a landfill with adequate capacity or comply with federal, State, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. Solid waste would be generated by construction and operational activities.

Construction Waste
Using a nonresidential construction waste generation rate published by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), development of the proposed project would generate an estimated 6,536 cubic yards of construction debris (Draft EIR, Table 3.13-15). This waste volume represents less than 0.01 percent of the 38.8 million cubic yards of remaining capacity at the Potrero Hills Landfill. Moreover, these values do not account for construction and demolition (C&D) debris recycling that would serve to divert waste from the landfill.

Operational Waste
Based on rates provided by Cal Recycle, the proposed project would generate an estimated 8,064 cubic yards of operational solid waste on an annual basis at buildout (Draft EIR, 3.13-16). This waste volume represents less than 0.01 percent of the 38.8 million cubic yards of remaining capacity at the Potrero Hills Landfill. Moreover, these values do not account for recycling and waste reduction activities that would serve to divert waste from the landfill. 3789
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations Cumulative Impacts
The proposed project, in conjunction with other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable developments, would not have a cumulatively significant impact related to utilities and service systems (Draft EIR, Page 4-14–16).

Findings: Less than significant cumulative impact (Draft EIR, Page 4-16). No mitigation is necessary.

Facts in Support of Findings
Water
The geographic scope of the cumulative potable water analysis is the City of American Canyon Public Works Department service area, which includes the American Canyon city limits.

As previously discussed, the proposed project’s demands would represent less than 1 percent of potable water supplies and 7 percent of recycled water supplies. Furthermore, the City of American Canyon’s 2015 UWMP estimates that sufficient water is available to meet the needs of the service area through the year 2040, which accounts for the City of American Canyon’s long-term growth assumptions. The City has adopted the Zero Water Footprint Policy that requires all new development to completely offset its potable water demand. The proposed project is required to comply with this policy, as would other projects listed in Table 4-1 of the Draft EIR that are served by the City of American Canyon’s Water Service Area.

For those projects that are located within the City’s water service area and areas in the County that were included in the original water district service area, the 2015 UWMP anticipates adequate water supplies for all water year scenarios through 2040. These projects also would be required to demonstrate that they would be served with potable water service as a standard requirement of the development review process, and these projects may be required to implement water conservation measures and to meet the requirements of the Zero Water Footprint Policy. Furthermore, the proposed project does not require any off-site water facilities to be constructed and expanded and, thus, would not result in physical impacts on the environment from such activities.

Notably, Volume 2 of the Final EIR included an updated version of the Water Supply Assessment (WSA) prepared for the Project (dated December 6, 2022). The original WSA had been included within Appendix I to the Draft EIR. Volume 2 of the Final EIR also includes a technical memorandum prepared by WSA author Balance Hydrologics addressing whether the conclusions of the updated WSA remained valid in light of (i) the City Council’s adoption on September 6, 2022 (via Resolution 2022-84) of an amendment to the City’s 2015 UWMP to demonstrate compliance with Policy WR P1 (Reduce Reliance on the Delta Through Improved Regional Water Self -Reliance) of the Delta Plan adopted by the Delta Stewardship Council and (ii) the City’s 2020 UWMP, which had been released to the public on January 18, 2023. The new memorandum concluded that neither the City Council’s adoption of Resolution 2022-84 nor the 2020 UWMP provided any basis for altering the conclusion from the original and updated WSAs that the City’s water system can meet the projected water demand of the Giovannoni Logistics Center Project in addition to existing and planned future uses over a 20-year projected time frame.
3790
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 42 Wastewater
The geographic scope of the cumulative wastewater analysis is the American Canyon Wastewater Treatment Plant service area, which encompasses the American Canyon city limits and areas within the Napa County Airport Industrial Park south of Fagan Creek.

The treatment plant has an existing design capacity of 2.5 million gallons per day (mgd) and the City has plans to increase it to 4 mgd over time. All future projects that are tributary to the American Canyon Wastewater Treatment Plant would be required to demonstrate that sewer service is available to ensure that adequate sanitation can be provided. As previously discussed, the proposed project’s estimated wastewater generation would represent 10 percent of the average daily flow treated by the expanded WWTP.

The sewer flows assumed from the proposed project are significantly less than anticipated for industrial projects in previous City planning documents. This is a result of the conservation activities that reduce water use and, in turn, reduce sewer flows. The original planning documents were drafted prior to the State passing all the conservations laws (2008-2010) and before the City defined the Zero Water Footprint Policy. The City has verified that the treatment plant has enough capacity to serve the planned development for Phases 1 and 2 of the proposed project, along with other projects that would be tributary to the WWTP.

Storm Drainage
All future development projects in the City are required to provide storm drainage facilities that collect and detain stormwater. The storm drainage facility shall include provisions for future upstream development and no development shall discharge at a rate that exceeds the capacity of any portion of the existing downstream system. Runoff from storms up to the 100-year return frequency are conveyed through storm facilities and disposed of in a manner that protects public and private improvements from flood hazards. The proposed project would install an on-site storm drainage system consisting of inlets, piping, and a series of detention basins. The peak discharge from the detention basin shall not exceed 90 percent of the undeveloped peak flow from the 24- hour, 100-year storm event. As such, the proposed project would ensure no net increase in stormwater would leave the project site during a peak storm event and would avoid cumulatively significant stormwater impacts to downstream waterways at times when capacity is most constrained. The proposed project would implement standard stormwater pollution prevention measures during construction to ensure downstream water quality impacts are minimized to the greatest extent possible. In addition, the proposed project would provide water quality measures to prevent pollution during project operations. Most past, and all present and reasonably foreseeable future development must comply with these State and local requirements that ensure no significant adverse cumulative impacts would result.

Solid Waste
The geographic scope of the cumulative solid waste analysis is the City of American Canyon.

American Canyon Recology provides solid waste and recycling collection services to commercial customers in the City of American Canyon.
3791
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations Many past and all present and reasonably foreseeable future development projects, which have or would generate construction and operational solid waste and, depending on the volumes and end uses, have been or would be required to implement recycling and waste reduction measures. As previously discussed, the proposed project’s construction and operational solid waste generation would represent less than 1 percent of the remaining capacity at this facility. As such, landfill capacity is sufficient to serve the proposed project as well as existing and planned land uses in the City of American Canyon for the foreseeable future. Additionally, the nearby Devlin Road Transfer Station offers construction and demolition debris recycling and incentivizes such activities through pricing. Thus, it would be expected that some of the projects listed in Table 4-1 of the Draft EIR would use such debris recycling services, which would divert materials from landfills, thereby extending the operational life of Potrero Hills Landfill.

1.6 - Potential Environmental Effects Which Can Be Mitigated Below a Level of Significance
The City of American Canyon hereby finds that feasible mitigation measures have been identified in the EIR that will avoid or substantially lessen the following potentially significant environmental impacts (i.e., mitigate them to a less than significant level). The potentially significant impacts, and the mitigation measures that will reduce them to a less than significant level, are as follows:

1.6.1 - Aesthetics
Potential Effect
Impact AES-3: The proposed project may create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area (Draft EIR Page 3.1-6–7).

Findings: Less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated (Draft EIR, Page 3.1-7).

Mitigation Measures
MM AES-3 Prior to issuance of building permits for the proposed project, the project applicant shall prepare and submit a photometric plan to the City of American Canyon for review and approval which demonstrates that all exterior light fixtures would be directed downward or employ full cut-off fixtures to minimize light spillage and avoid interference with aviation operations at the Napa County Airport. The approved plan shall be incorporated into the proposed project.

Facts in Support of Findings
Phases 1 and 2
The proposed project development would result in the installation of new sources of light and glare on the project site. These new sources of light include additional street lighting along internal roadways, building-mounted light fixtures, and pole-mounted light fixtures within parking areas.

Additionally, illuminated signage may be employed. Mitigation Measure (MM) AES-3 requires the 3792
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 44 project applicant to prepare and submit a photometric plan to the City of American Canyon for review and approval to demonstrate that all exterior light fixtures would be directed downward or employ full cut-off fixtures to minimize light spillage and avoid interference with aviation operations at the Napa County Airport. Downward-directed lighting and full cut-off fixtures would prevent the trespass of light and glare onto neighboring properties or conflict with aviation operations.

The City finds that MM AES-3 is feasible, is adopted, and will further reduce impacts related to light and glare. Accordingly, the City finds that, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(1) and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(1), changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project that mitigate or avoid the potentially significant impacts as identified in the EIR. Therefore, impacts associated with aesthetics would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated.

1.6.2 - Biological Resources
Potential Effect
Impact BIO-1: The proposed project could have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive or special-status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or Unites States Fish and Wildlife Service (Draft EIR Page 3.3-22–28; Final EIR, vol. 2, Pages 4-1 – 4-2; see also Final EIR, vol. 2, Master Response A).

Findings: Less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated (Draft EIR, Page 3.-26).

Mitigation Measures
MM BIO-1a Pre-construction surveys for Swainson’s hawk shall be conducted in the project site vicinity prior to initiation of project construction activities and each year following initiation of construction if project activities are delayed or discontinued for 7 or more days prior to the first required survey period (March 20 to April 5) and are scheduled to recommence construction activities during the second survey period but before August 1. These pre-construction surveys shall include investigation of all potential nesting trees within a half-mile radius around all project activities and shall be completed for at least two survey periods immediately prior to commencement of project construction. Surveys shall be conducted in accordance with CDFW’s “Recommended timing and methodology for Swainson’s Hawk Nesting Surveys in California’s Central Valley” (CDFW 2000) to maximize the potential for locating nesting Swainson’s hawk and reduce the potential for nest failures due to project activities and/or disturbances.

If no nesting Swainson’s hawks are found during the first or second required survey periods starting March 20 and extending to April 20, then project construction may commence. If during the third survey (June 10 to July 30) Swainson’s hawks are 3793
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations found to be nesting in the project vicinity and construction has commenced, it shall be assumed the Swainson’s hawk commenced nesting and thus the Swainson’s hawk are habituated to the ambient level of noise and disturbance emanating from the project site. If Swainson’s hawks are found to be nesting within 0.25-mile of the project site, a non-disturbance buffer shall be established to keep all construction activities a minimum of 0.25-mile from the nest site. The CDFW shall be consulted regarding the adequacy of the buffer established by the qualified Raptor Biologist. At that time the necessity for acquiring a Fish and Game Section 2081 Incidental Take Permit (ITP) authorization would be determined. An ITP authorization shall be required if there were a valid concern the project activities would result in the “take” of an adult Swainson’s hawk, eggs, or nestlings.

Surveys shall be conducted by a qualified Raptor Biologist with at least a minimum of a 4- year college degree in wildlife biology or related environmental science, familiarity with Swainson’s hawk and its local ecology, and 2 years of experience surveying for and detecting Swainson’s hawk pursuant to “Recommended timing and methodology for Swainson’s Hawk Nesting Surveys in California’s Central Valley” survey protocol. No disturbance such as construction or earthmoving activity shall occur within the established buffer zone until it is determined by a qualified Raptor Biologist that the young have fledged or that the nesting cycle is complete based on monitoring of the active nest by a qualified Biologist.

MM BIO-1b No more than 30 days prior to the first ground disturbance activity, pre-construction golden eagle nesting surveys shall be conducted in the project vicinity by a qualified Raptor Biologist. The qualified Raptor Biologist shall have a minimum of a 4- year college degree in wildlife biology or related environmental science, at least 2 years conducting wildlife surveys, and a familiarity with golden eagle and its local ecology.

Pre-construction surveys shall include investigation of all potential nesting trees within a survey area determined by the qualified Raptor Biologist, but no less than a 1 mile radius around all project activities. If active golden eagle nests are identified within any trees within the survey areas a 1 mile radius of the project site, a qualified Raptor Biologist shall establish a protection buffer of approximately 1 mile feet that is adequate to ensure noise or activity from the proposed project would not cause nest disturbance of young or adult bird mortality. Buffer zones may vary in size as some golden eagles are more acclimated to disturbance than others. Size of buffer zone may be modified by the qualified Raptor Biologist considering the type of construction activity that may occur and the behavioral factors and extent that golden eagle may have acclimated to disturbance. No construction or earthmoving activity shall occur within the established buffer zone until it is determined by a qualified Raptor Biologist that the young golden eagles have fledged or that the nesting cycle is complete based on monitoring of the active nest by the qualified Biologist.

MM BIO-1c Prior to ground disturbance, a pre-construction nesting survey shall be conducted for northern harrier and short-eared owl by a qualified Raptor Biologist if construction is scheduled during the nesting season (February 1 through September 3794
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 46 1). The qualified Raptor Biologist shall have at least 2 years of experience surveying for and detecting nesting northern harrier and short-eared owl. To determine whether northern harrier or short-eared owl is nesting on-site, a qualified Raptor Biologist(s) shall conduct walking transects through the project site grassland habitat searching for nests and minimum 500-foot radius from project site. Where the survey area encroaches onto private property not accessible to the public (e.g., fenced in commercial property, residential backyard, etc., the qualified Biologist shall either contact the property owner for permission to physically access the property or conduct a visual survey of adjacent areas by scanning with binoculars or a spotting scope. An active northern harrier or short-eared owl nest must be protected by implementing a minimum 500-foot radius buffer zone around the nest marked with orange construction fencing. If an active nest is located outside of the project site, the buffer shall be extended onto the project site and demarcated where it intersects the project site. Size of buffer zone could be increased considering the type of construction activity that may occur, physical barriers between the construction site and active nest, and the behavioral factors and extent that northern harrier or short-eared owl may have acclimated to disturbance. No construction or earthmoving activity shall occur within the established buffer zone until it is determined by a qualified Raptor Biologist that the young have fledged or that the nesting cycle is otherwise determined to be complete based on monitoring of the active nest by a qualified Raptor Biologist.

MM BIO-1d Prior to any ground disturbance, pre-construction surveys for burrowing owl shall be conducted within a minimum of 150 meters of the project site. Where the survey area encroaches onto private property not accessible to the public (e.g., fenced in commercial property, residential backyard, etc.), the qualified Biologist shall either contact the property owner for permission to physically access the property or conduct a visual survey of adjacent areas by scanning with binoculars or a spotting scope. The pre-construction surveys shall be conducted within 2 weeks prior to the onset of any ground-disturbing activities. Surveys shall be conducted by a qualified Biologist following California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) 2012 staff report survey methods and Biologist qualifications to establish the status of burrowing owl on the project site.
• If burrowing owl are found to occupy the project site during the nonbreeding season (September 1 to January 31), occupied burrows shall be avoided by establishing a no-disturbance buffer zone a minimum of 100 feet around the burrow. Buffers may be adjusted to address site-specific conditions using the impact assessment approach described in the CDFW 2012 staff report. If a qualified Raptor Biologist determines the location of an occupied burrow/s may be impacted even with a 100-foot buffer, or the burrow(s) are in a location(s) on the project site where a buffer cannot be established without preventing the proposed project from moving forward, then a passive relocation effort may be instituted to relocate the individual(s) out of harm’s way pursuant to a 3795
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations Burrowing Owl Exclusion Plan prepared in accordance with the CDFW 2012 staff report.
• If burrowing owl are found to be present during the breeding season (February 1 to August 31), the proposed project ground-disturbing activities shall follow the CDFW 2012 staff report recommended avoidance protocol whereby occupied burrows shall be avoided with a no-disturbance buffer.
• If burrowing owls are ultimately found on the site and burrow eviction/ relocation of burrowing owls during the non-nesting season is a selected strategy to move forward with the project without direct impacts to burrowing owl individuals, the applicant shall coordinate this effort with CDFW and provide habitat mitigation consistent with the 2012 CDFW Staff Report on burrowing owl.

Facts in Support of Findings
Implementation MM BIO-1a, MM BIO-1b, MM BIO-1c and MM BIO-1d would avoid the “take” of Swainson’s hawk and golden eagle defined by California Endangered Species Act (CESA); avoid disturbing a northern harrier or burrowing owl active nest; and avoid harming a burrowing owl during the nonbreeding season if it is occupying a burrow within the project site.

Special-status Plants
HBG retained Dr. Brent Helm of Helm Biological Consulting, a division Tansley Team, Inc., to conduct botanical surveys for the presence of special-status plant species with the potential to occur at the site. These botanical surveys utilized CDFW protocols identified in “Protocols for Surveying and Evaluating Impacts to Special Status Native Plant Populations and Sensitive Natural Communities” dated March 20, 2018.

Helm Biological Consulting conducted a 10-mile radius search using the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) and determined 23 special-status plant species were associated with habitats that are known to occur near the project site. Helm Biological Consulting conducted botanical surveys during the spring of 2021 and survey dates were chosen based on when the special-status plants would be in bloom or otherwise visible. Based on the Helm Biological Consulting botanical survey results, no special-status plant species occur on the project site. Therefore, no impacts to special-status species would occur from construction of the proposed project.

Special-status Animals
Monarch Butterfly
No trees are present on the project site so there is no possibility for the presence of a monarch butterfly overwintering site at the project site. Studies of the site or portions of the site have not indicated the presence of milkweed plants of the genus Asclepias that serve as the larval host plant for monarchs. Therefore, no potentially significant impacts to monarch butterflies would result from construction of the proposed project.

Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp
LSA Inc. conducted dry season vernal pool fairy shrimp surveys in summer of 2016, and Monk & Associates, Inc. conducted wet season vernal pool fairy shrimp surveys in winter of 2016-2017. 3796
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 48 Survey methods were conducted in accordance with the USFWS revised Survey Guidelines for the Listed Large Branchiopods (May 31, 2015). No vernal pool fairy shrimp were observed during the dry or wet season surveys. Therefore, no impacts to vernal pool fairy shrimp would result from construction of the proposed project.

California Red-legged Frog
A habitat assessment prepared for the project site by Rana Resources found that the project site lacks habitat necessary to support the California red-legged frog. There is no suitable breeding or rearing habitat for California red-legged frog on-site due to the shallow and ephemeral nature of the seasonal wetlands and the lack of any suitable riparian vegetation for cover. Therefore, no impacts to California red-legged frog would result from construction of the proposed project.

Western Pond Turtle
Suitable habitat for western pond turtle does not occur on the site due to the shallow and ephemeral nature of the seasonal wetlands, which are inundated for only about 3 to 4 months out of the year and even less in drought years. Surrounding uplands of suitable shrub/woodlands and appropriate basking sites are also lacking. No impacts to western pond turtle would result from development of the proposed project.

Swainson’s Hawk
The operative significance thresholds for impacts to Swainson’s hawk are (i) whether the proposed project would have a substantial adverse effect on the species, either directly or through habitat modifications, or (ii) whether the project would substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of the species. Although the project will result in a net loss of foraging habitat, such a net loss occurring in the particular area in which the project site is located will not cause either a substantial adverse effect on the species, a substantial reduction in its numbers, or a substantial restriction of its range. There is no need to “net out the impact of a proposed project” for that impact to be less than significant. (See Save Panoche Valley v. San Benito County (2013) 217 Cal.App.4th 503, 529). There are no trees located on the project site, and no large trees capable of supporting nesting by Swainson’s hawk in the immediate project vicinity. The non-native grasslands and seasonal wetlands and swales found on the property provide suitable foraging habitat for Swainson’s hawk that may nest away from the project site. Swainson’s hawk was observed foraging on the site during surveys conducted in April and May 2021. Development of the proposed project would remove some foraging area for this species. However, development of the proposed project would also provide and preserve in perpetuity approximately 44.8 acres of open space that would include habitat currently suitable for foraging by the Swainson’s hawk. The adjacent Napa Logistics Park Project has preserved 37 acres of grassland and wetlands in perpetuity that provides foraging habitat for Swainson’s hawk. Between these two preservation areas abutting and directly adjacent to the project site, approximately 82 acres of suitable habitat would be available for the Swainson’s hawk.

In addition, there are several large open space preserves within 2 and 5 miles of the project site, which combined provide approximately 2,000 acres of suitable foraging habitat. The relatively small loss of foraging habitat on the project site will not affect the range of the species or cause the loss of substantial numbers of individual hawks. The proposed 45-acre Wetland Preserve with its seasonal wetlands would be available to provide foraging habitat for the Swainson’s hawk in perpetuity.

Additionally, less than 2 miles from the project site are 620 acres of dedicated open space (Newell 3797
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations Open Space) that are also preserved in perpetuity. The Newell Open Space appears to primarily comprise annual grassland with discrete areas of oak woodland and riparian woodland. Further, the Newell Open Space abuts other dedicated open space preserves, including the 1,039-acre Lynch Canyon Open Space Park and the American Canyon 308-acre California red-legged frog preserve.

Combined, these open spaces dedicate over 2,000 acres of open space that can be used for foraging by the Swainson’s hawk because the open space supports the small mammals, amphibians, reptiles, and birds on which Swainson’s hawks prey. This demonstrates that based on the limited number of Swainson’s hawk records in Napa County, there is more than sufficient foraging habitat in the area that will be preserved in perpetuity to support actively nesting hawks and that further provide foraging habitat for other raptors of concern, specifically golden eagles and western burrowing owls.

Accordingly, the proposed project would not result in significant impacts to foraging habitat either directly, indirectly, or cumulatively. The net loss of foraging habitat resulting from the proposed project will not cause either a substantial adverse effect on the species, a substantial reduction in its numbers, or a substantial restriction of its range. Construction of the proposed project would not be expected to affect the nesting population of Swainson’s hawk known from Napa County. Accordingly, additional preservation over and above the 45-acre Wetland Preserve is not warranted for the proposed project. Based upon the limited number of known Swainson’s hawk to occur within a 10- mile radius of the project site and the acreage of existing foraging habitat currently protected, the proposed project would not result in significant impacts to foraging habitat directly, indirectly, or cumulatively. Therefore, no mitigation is warranted for Swainson’s hawk foraging habitat.

Although eucalyptus and other large trees located within about 0.25 mile from the project site provide potential nesting habitat, no nesting by Swainson’s hawk (or any raptor species) was noted during surveys for nesting Swainson’s hawk conducted by HBG in April and May 2021. Preconstruction nesting surveys, as described in MM BIO-1a, are warranted to ensure that the proposed project will not impact Swainson’s hawk.

Golden Eagle
There are no trees located on the project site, and no large trees capable of supporting nesting by golden eagle in the immediate vicinity of the project site; however, the non-native grasslands and seasonal wetlands and swales found on the property provide suitable foraging habitat for golden eagle that may nest away from the project site. Accordingly, for the same reasons the proposed project would not result in an indirect or cumulative loss of Swainson’s hawk foraging habitat, it would also not result in a significant indirect or cumulative loss of golden eagle foraging habitat.

A single golden eagle was observed exhibiting foraging behavior on the site in spring 2021. No nesting by golden eagle (or any raptor species) was noted during surveys for nesting Swainson’s hawk conducted in April and May 2021.

As golden eagle has been known to nest in the general area of the City of American Canyon, future nesting in suitable nest trees as close as about 0.25 mile from the project site cannot be ruled out.

Pre-construction surveys for golden eagle, as described in MM BIO-1b, are warranted to ensure that construction activities do not result in impacts to nesting individuals of this species. 3798
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 50 Northern Harrier
Suitable nesting habitat for the northern harrier (a State Designated Species of Special Concern) occurs within the non-native grasslands and seasonal wetlands and swales found within the project site. Northern harrier individuals were observed foraging over the project site during both winter and spring (breeding) seasons during surveys conducted by Helm Biological Consulting. Preconstruction surveys for northern harrier, as described in MM BIO-1c, are warranted to ensure that construction activities do not result in impacts to nesting harriers.

Burrowing Owl
A small number of burrowing owl have been recorded in the CNDDB within the general project vicinity, with the nearest reports from as close as about 1.7 miles north of the project site and about

2.5 miles south. No burrowing owl or occupied California ground squirrel burrows were observed on the project site during a field review conducted by Helm Biological Consulting in December 2020 and April and May 2021, or during previous biological studies conducted by Monk & Associates, LSA Associates, or Rana Resources. It is possible that ground squirrel could establish colonies on the site in the future prior to project construction, providing new occupiable habitats for burrowing owl. The proposed project shall implement MM BIO-1d to ensure that no burrowing owl would be impacted by construction activities.

Tricolored Blackbird
Helm Biological Consulting has concluded that vegetative characteristics of preferred nesting habitat for tricolored blackbird does not occur at the project site. Therefore, no impacts to tricolored blackbird nesting colonies would result from implementation of the proposed project.

The City finds that MM BIO-1a, MM BIO-1b, MM BIO-1c and MM BIO-1d are feasible, are adopted, and will further reduce impacts to related species. Accordingly, the City finds that, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(1) and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(1), changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project that mitigate or avoid the potentially significant impacts as identified in the EIR. Therefore, impacts associated with biology would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated.

Potential Effect
Impact BIO-2: The proposed project could have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulation or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or United States Fish and Wildlife Service (Draft EIR

Page 3 ends

Findings: Less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated (Draft EIR, Page 3.3-29).

2.57 acres of seasonal wetlands and 1.13 acres of vernal pools from Phase 2, and to ensure there is no-net loss of wetland area, the applicant shall establish/create

0.992 acre of palustrine emergent wetlands (2:1 ratio) for Phase 1 concurrent with project construction, and 2.57 acres of seasonal wetlands (1:1 ratio) and 1.13 acres of vernal pool wetlands (1:1 ratio) for Phase 2 at least 1 year prior to the start of Phase 2 construction, on the 45-acre Wetland Preserve. The established/created wetlands will be constructed a minimum of 20 feet from the Napa Logistics Park sewer and recycled water pipeline easement or unpaved access road associated with the easement. The established/created wetlands shall be monitored for a minimum of 5 years to ensure the wetlands meet the USACE’s and RWQCB’s definition of a wetland.

Facts in Support of Findings
The proposed project would impact a total of 3.70 acres of wetland. Implementation of MM BIO-2 would offset permanent impacts to the palustrine emergent wetlands and vernal pools and ensure there is no net loss of wetland area.

The portion of the project site along the northern boundary contained within the confines of No Name Creek would be subject to the regulatory jurisdiction of the CDFW under Fish and Game Code Section 1602. No impacts would occur and there would be no requirement to obtain a Streambed Alteration Agreement from the CDFW. As the area of No Name Creek is contained within the approximately 45-acre Wetland Preserve, no impacts to the palustrine emergent wetland swale/seasonal wetland associated with No Name Creek would occur from either Phase 1 or 2 of the proposed project.

The City finds that MM BIO-2 is feasible, is adopted, and will further reduce impacts related to wetlands. Accordingly, the City finds that, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(1) and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(1), changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project that mitigate or avoid the potentially significant impacts as identified in the EIR. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated.

Potential Effect
Impact BIO-3: The proposed project could have a substantial adverse effect on State or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruptions, or other means (Draft EIR Page 3.3-29–36; Final EIR, vol. 2, Pages 4-3 – 4-7; see also Final EIR, vol. 2, Master Response C).

Findings: Less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated (Draft EIR, Page 3.3-32).

Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects as identified in the EIR (State CEQA Guidelines § 15091(a)(1)).
3800
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 52 Mitigation Measures
MM BIO-3a Prior to issuance of the Phase 1 grading permit, the project applicant shall apply for and obtain a Nationwide Permit from the San Francisco District of the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) for discharge within 0.004 acre of wetlands/waters of the United States under Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 404 jurisdiction. For the USACE permit to be valid, the applicant shall apply for and obtain the accompanying Section 401 Water Quality Certification from the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (San Francisco Bay RWQCB). The applicant shall apply for and obtain a separate Waiver of Waste Discharge Requirements from the San Francisco Bay RWQCB for impacts to 0.496 acre of wetlands/waters of the State. To offset the loss of 0.496 acre of permanent wetland impacts and to ensure there is no-net loss of wetland area, the applicant shall establish/create 0.992 acre of wetlands (2:1 ratio), prior to or concurrent with the start of construction, on the 45-acre Wetland Preserve. The established/created wetlands shall be monitored for a minimum of 5 years to ensure the wetlands meet the USACE’s and RWQCB’s definition of a wetland. The applicant shall implement the terms of the approved permit(s).

MM BIO-3b Prior to issuance of the Phase 2 grading permit, the project applicant shall apply for and obtain an Individual Permit from the San Francisco District of the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) for the placement of fill material within approximately 3.7 acres of wetlands/waters of the United States under Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 404 jurisdiction. For the USACE permit to be valid, the applicant shall apply for and obtain the accompanying Section 401 Water Quality Certification from the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (San Francisco Bay RWQCB). The applicant shall apply for and obtain a separate Waiver of Waste Discharge Requirements from the San Francisco Bay RWQCB for the discharge of fill material within approximately 3.7 acres of waters of the State. To offset the loss of

3.7 acres of permanent wetland impacts and to ensure there is no-net loss of wetland area or permanent loss of functions and values, the applicant shall establish/create 2.57 acres of seasonal wetlands (1:1 ratio) and 1.13 acres of vernal pools (1:1 ratio), at a minimum of 1 year prior to the start of construction, on the 45- acre Wetland Preserve. The established/created wetlands and vernal pools shall be monitored for a minimum of 5 years to ensure the wetlands meet the USACE’s and RWQCB’s definition of a wetland. The applicant shall implement the terms of the approved permit(s).

MM BIO-3c Prior to issuance of the Phase 1 grading permit, a Wetland Mitigation and Monitoring Plan shall be prepared and submitted to the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (San Francisco Bay RWQCB) for review as part of the process for obtaining a permit from the agency. The Wetland Mitigation and Monitoring Plan shall address the loss of 0.496 acre of wetlands impact due to Phase 1 of the proposed project as well as the potential loss of approximately 3.7 acres of wetlands that as part of Phase 2. The Wetland Mitigation and Monitoring Plan shall include in irrevocable instrument (e.g., deed restriction or conservation easements) 3801
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations that shall restrict use of both the 0.992 acre of created wetlands for Phase 1 as well as approximately 3.7 acres of additional wetlands created for Phase 2. The Wetland Mitigation and Monitoring Plan shall also include a long-term endowment that would be fully funded by the proposed project to manage the approximately 45-acre open space preserve and created wetlands in perpetuity. If additional wetland mitigation lands are required to compensate for wetland impacts associated with Phase 2, wetlands shall be established/created at a minimum 1:1 ratio (1 acre established/created for every acre permanently impacted) on appropriate mitigation land, approved by the RWQCB and United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), within the Phase 2 project site’s Hydraulic Unit Code (HUC) 10 watershed. The established/created wetlands shall be monitored for a minimum of 5 years to ensure the wetlands meet the USACE’s and RWQCB’s definition of a wetland. The applicant shall implement the terms of the approved permit(s).

MM BIO-3d Prior to issuance of the Phase 1 and Phase 2 grading permit, a Wetland Mitigation and Monitoring Plan shall be submitted to the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (San Francisco Bay RWQCB) for review as part of the process for obtaining a permit from the agency. The Wetland Mitigation and Monitoring Plan shall be prepared in accordance with the Subpart J–Compensatory Mitigation for Losses of Aquatic Resources outlined in the California State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) Procedures, and in accordance with the State Water Board Implementation Guidance dated April 2020, and in accordance with the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Compensatory Mitigation Rule (33 Code of Federal Regulations Part 332)
The basic objective of the Wetland Mitigation and Monitoring Plan is to ensure that project wetland impacts, and compensatory mitigation proposed to offset the wetland impacts, shall provide a no-net-loss of area of wetlands, and wetlands established/created shall be in-kind to the wetlands impacted. In summary, the Wetland Mitigation and Monitoring Plan shall at a minimum:

1. Preserve 7.58 acres of existing seasonal wetlands and 0.13 acre of vernal pools within the 45-acre Wetland Preserve.

2. Establish within the Wetland Preserve approximately 0.992 acre of seasonal wetlands in advance of or concurrent with implementation of Phase 1 impacts to

0.496 acre of palustrine emergent wetlands at a 2:1 ratio.

3. Establish within the Wetland Preserve approximately 2.57 acres of seasonal wetlands and 1.13 acres of vernal pools in advance of implementation of future Phase 2, assuming Phase 2 is built out, to address the potential maximum losses of approximately 3.7 acres of wetlands that may occur.

4. Provide financial assurances to ensure a high level of confidence that the compensatory mitigation shall be successfully completed, in accordance with applicable performance standards.

5. Design ecological performance standards to assess whether the Wetland Mitigation and Monitoring Plan is achieving the overall objectives, so that it can be objectively evaluated to determine whether it is developing into the desired 3802
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 54 resource type (vernal pool, seasonal wetland e.g.), and attaining any other applicable metrics such as acres, number of native plant species, water saturation and/or ponding depth etc.

6. Monitor the site for a duration necessary to determine whether the Wetland Mitigation and Monitoring Plan is meeting the performance standards.

Established palustrine emergent wetlands and vernal pools typically develop quickly on soils with clay restrictive horizon. The 45-acre Wetland Preserve does have a clay restrictive layer approximately 8–18 inches below the surface, therefore a 5-year monitoring period would be sufficient to determine whether performance standards are met. This monitoring period may be extended if performance standards are not met due to how the wetlands were constructed or natural events such as severe droughts.

7. Protect the approximately 45-acre Wetland Preserve in perpetuity using a conservation easement and provide an endowment sufficient to fund the LongTerm Management Plan.

Physical structure such as topographic complexity and physical features that may provide habitat for aquatic species (e.g., boulders, woody debris etc.) shall be recorded and used to design the created/established wetlands. The purpose of this assessment is to ensure the design of the wetlands shall provide habitat that is similar to the wetlands being impacted to ensure the impacted wetlands are mitigated in-kind.

Performance Standards
Performance Standards shall include at a minimum the following:

Years 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 Performance Standards for Wetland Hydrology Each year wetland hydrology shall be measured during the winter when surface and/orsubsurface hydrology would be observable. A minimum of 1 data point shall be taken in each of the established/created wetlands. In addition, wetland hydrologic indicators shall be recorded each spring during the vegetation monitoring period.

Year 1:

Performance standard would be met for Year 1-5 if:
• The created wetlands remain inundated to a minimum depth of 0.5 inch or greater for at least 7 days and/or saturated for at least 14 days and/or at least 3803
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations one primary or two secondary wetland hydrology indicators listed in the Arid West Region Wetland Determination Data Forms are recorded.

Contingency Measures:

If the annual performance standard is not being met for any given monitoring year the Permittee shall prepare an analysis of the cause(s) of failure and, if determined necessary, implement remedial action. If the Plan Area has not met the performance standard, the Permittee’s maintenance and monitoring obligations shall continue until the RWQCB and CDFW give final project confirmation.

Remedial action may include re-grading to achieve wetland hydrology, which would improve hydric soil formation.

Years 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 Performance Standards for Increase in Colonization of Wetland Vegetation
Each year during the spring or early summer wetland vegetation cover shall be measured by conducting a site visit and recording absolute cover and dominant plant species observed within the wetland buffer area. A minimum of 1 data point shall be taken in each of the established/created wetlands. The colonization of wetland vegetation shall be measured by determining overall absolute plant cover values each year. Thisshall be accomplished by measuring absolute cover values within a 5-foot radius sample plot every 50 feet along a transect through each established/created wetland. In addition, to monitor for invasive plant species within the uplands which are not detected in the baseline survey, a minimum of three 5- foot radius sample plots on the east side and three on the west side will be placed at random upland locations along a linear transect east to west within the Wetland Preserve. During Year 4 and 5 the managed landscaped areas within the development will be visually surveyed for evidence of invasive plant species.

Performance Standards for each monitoring year are listed below.

Year 1:

Performance standard would be met for Year 1 if:
• At least one hydrophytic plantspecies colonizesthe established/created seasonal wetlands and vernal pools; and
• The average absolute cover of wetland vegetation within an established/created seasonal wetlands and vernal pools is 5 percent or greater.

Year 2:

Performance standard would be met for Year 2 if:
• At least one hydrophytic plantspecies colonizesthe established/created seasonal wetlands and vernal pools; and
• The average absolute cover of wetland vegetation within an established/created seasonal wetlands and vernal pools is 10 percent or greater. 3804
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 56 Year 3:

Performance standard would be met for Year 3 if:
• Atleast two hydrophytic plantspecies colonizesthe established/created seasonal wetlands;
• At least two native hydrophytic plantspecies colonizes the established/created vernal pools and at least one is a vernal pool habitat indicator species; and • The average absolute cover of wetland vegetation within an established/created seasonal wetlands and vernal pools is 20 percent or greater and comprised of native and naturalized species.

Year 4:

Performance standard would be met for Year 4 if:
• Atleast two hydrophytic plantspecies colonize the established/created seasonal wetlands.
• At least two native hydrophytic plantspecies colonizes the established/created vernal pools and at least one is a vernal pool habitat indicator species. • The average absolute cover of wetland vegetation within an established/created seasonal wetland and vernal pool is 30 percent or greater. • To meet the wetland performance standard invasive plant species within the wetlands shall not comprise greater than 5 percent of the total absolute cover. To meet the upland performance standard, invasive plant species, which currently are not supported in the uplands within the Wetland Preserve, shall not comprise greater than 5 percent of the total absolute cover. Invasive plants shall be defined as species rated as “High” by California Invasive Plant Council (Cal-IPC) and species on the ”Alert” or “Watch” list with a High rating. • The managed landscaped areas within the development will be visually surveyed for evidence of invasive plant species. To meet the managed landscape performance standard, invasive plant species, which currently are not supported in the uplands within the Wetland Preserve, shall not comprise greater than 5 percent of the total absolute cover. Invasive plants shall be defined as species rated as “High” by California Invasive Plant Council (Cal-IPC) and species on the ”Alert” or “Watch” list with a High rating.

Year 5:

To meet the upland performance standard, invasive plant species, which currently are not supported in the uplands, within the Wetland Preserve shall not comprise greater than 5 percent of the total absolute cover. Invasive plants shall be defined as species rated as “High” by California Invasive Plant Council (CalIPC) and species on the “Alert” or “Watch” list with a High rating. • The managed landscaped areas within the development will be visually surveyed for evidence of invasive plant species. To meet the managed landscape performance standard, invasive plant species, which currently are not supported in the uplands within the Wetland Preserve, shall not comprise greater than 5 percent of the total absolute cover. Invasive plants shall be defined as species rated as “High” by California Invasive Plant Council (Cal-IPC) and species on the “Alert” or “Watch” list with a High rating.

Contingency Measures:

If the annual performance standard is not being met for any given monitoring year the Permittee shall prepare an analysis of the cause(s) of failure and, if determined necessary, implement remedial action. Remedial action may include hydroseeding with native species, or addition of supplemental topsoil or mulch to promote growth, control of invasive using mechanical equipment, grazing animals.

Year 5 No-Net-Loss Performance Standard for Phase 1 Impacts Performance standard would be met for Year 5 when;
• A wetland delineation is performed and verified by the USACE and confirms a minimum of 0.992 acre of wetlands have been established/created within the Wetland Preserve.

Year 5 No-Net-Loss Performance Standard for Phase 2 Impacts The Phase 2 no-net-loss performance standard would be measured when an application for the Phase 2 project is submitted to the RWQCB and USACE, and the Phase 2 project is approved. Once Phase 2 has been approved by the RWQCB and USACE, this performance standard may be modified depending on the level of wetland impacts authorized by the RWQCB and USACE, meaning this performance standard may decrease if the wetlands impacted for Phase 1 are less than 3.7 acres.

Performance standard would be met for Year 5 when;
3806
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 58 • A wetland delineation is performed and verified by the USACE and confirms a minimum of 2.57 acres ofseasonal wetland and 1.13 acres of vernal pools have been established/created within the Wetland Preserve.

Year 5 Long-Term Protection and Long-Term Funding
Performance standard would be met for Year 5 once:
• The Wetland Preserve has been placed under a conservation easement; and • A long-term financing mechanism (e.g., non-wasting endowment, trusts, contractual arrangement etc.) to fund implementation of the long-term management of the Wetland Preserve has been secured.

Facts in Support of Findings
Implementation of MM BIO-3a, MM BIO-3b, MM BIO-3c, and MM BIO-3d, would offset permanent impacts in-kind to the palustrine emergent wetland and in-kind to the vernal pools and ensure there is no net loss of wetland area.

Region 1 of the USFWS developed the “Recovery Plan for Vernal Pool Ecosystems of California and Southern Oregon” dated December 15, 2005. The recovery plan includes designated “core” areas that are specific sites necessary to recover endangered or threatened species or to conserve the species of concern addressed in this recovery plan. The project site is near two core areas referred to as the “Napa River Core Area.” The project site itself is not within a core area and does not support vernal pool complexes that support plants and animals targeted in the USFWS recovery plan.

Furthermore, Phase 1 of the proposed project would establish a 45-acre Wetland Preserve that may provide long-term, beneficial impacts to the adjacent Napa River Core Area and recovery plan by providing protected wetland and vernal pool habitat in proximity to the Napa River Core Area. For these reasons, no adverse impacts to the Napa River Core Area would occur from construction of the proposed project. No mitigation is warranted for the Napa River Core Area.

Phase 1
Grading activities would result in the permanent placement of fill material (soil) into 0.496 acres of palustrine emergent wetlands considered waters of the State under the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act. Of the 0.496 acres of waters of the State, the USACE has determined 0.004 acres are considered waters of the United States under the federal CWA. The applicant would be required to obtain a Nationwide Permit from the USACE for discharge within 0.004 acre of wetlands under CWA Section 404 jurisdiction along with an accompanying Section 401 Water Quality Certification from the San Francisco Bay RWQCB. The applicant would also need to obtain a separate Waiver of Waste Discharge from the San Francisco Bay RWQCB for impacts to 0.496 acre of waters of the State, as described in MM BIO-3a. The City of American Canyon processed a separate Nationwide Permit for impacts to 0.21 acre on the 8.3-acre project site for the Devlin Road/Vine Trail Extension project.

Exhibit 3.3-4 of the Draft EIR depicts the Wetlands Mitigation Plan, and Draft EIR Table 3.3-1 details enumeration of the wetland impacts within the proposed project development. 3807
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations Phase 2
Phase 2 of the proposed project would impact approximately 2.57 acres of seasonal wetlands and

1.13 acres of vernal pool wetlands considered both waters of the State and waters of the United States (Draft EIR, Exhibit 3.3-5). Per MM BIO-3b, the applicant would be required to obtain an Individual Permit from the USACE and submit a plan to compensate for wetland losses as well as a detailed alternatives analysis under the Section 404(b)(1) guidelines. A CWA Section 401 Water Quality Certification from the San Francisco Bay RWQCB and a Waiver of Waste Discharge Requirements for San Francisco Bay RWQCB pursuant to the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act would also be required.

MM BIO-3d would require a detailed Wetland Mitigation and Monitoring Plan be prepared and submitted to the San Francisco Bay RWQCB for review as part of the process for obtaining a permit from the agency.

The City finds that MM BIO-3a, MM BIO-3b, MM BIO-3c and MM BIO-3d are feasible, are adopted, and will further reduce impacts related to riparian habitat, wetlands and natural communities.

Accordingly, the City finds that, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(1) and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(1), changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project that mitigate or avoid the potentially significant impacts as identified in the EIR. Therefore, impacts associated with biology would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated.

Potential Effect
Impact BIO-4: The proposed project could interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors or impeded the use of wildlife nursery sites (Draft EIR Page 3.3-37–39; Final EIR, vol. 2,

Page 4 ends

Findings: Less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated (Draft EIR, Page 3.3-39).

Mitigation Measures
MM BIO-4 If construction occurs during the breeding season of migratory and resident birds (February 1 to August 31), a qualified Biologist shall conduct a pre-construction breeding bird survey in areas of suitable habitat within 7 days prior to the onset of construction activity. Surveys shall be conducted within the project footprint and 100 feet from the construction limits for nesting passerines, 250 feet from the construction limits for nesting accipiters and a minimum of 500 feet from the construction limits for nesting raptors. If the survey area is found to be absent of nesting birds, no further mitigation would be required. However, if construction activities are delayed by more than 7 days, an additional nesting bird survey shall be performed. If bird nests are found, appropriate buffer zones shall be established around all active nests to protect nesting adults and their young from direct or 3808
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 60 indirect impacts related to project construction disturbance. Size of buffer zones shall be determined per recommendations of the qualified Biologist based on-site conditions and species involved, but typical buffers around active nests are 500 feet for large raptors such as buteos, 250 feet for small raptors such as accipiters, and 100 feet for passerines (songbirds) and other bird species. For special status species, a 0.25-mile buffer shall be established for nesting Swainson’s hawk; 1 mile for golden eagle; and a 500-foot buffer for nesting tricolored blackbirds. If an active nest is located outside of the project site, the buffer shall be extended onto the project site and demarcated where it intersects the project site. Buffer zones shall be maintained until it can be documented that either the nest has failed, or the young have fledged.

Facts in Support of Findings
Phases 1 and 2
The development of the proposed project would not result in significant impacts to movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species, migratory wildlife corridors or use of wildlife nursery sites on the site. As discussed previously, the proposed project contains mitigation measures to address impacts to sensitive habitat, including the preparation and implementation of a detailed Compensatory Wetland Mitigation Plan. As previously discussed, the site design includes the preservation of the approximately 45-acre Wetland Preserve. Any species of fauna that may be displaced during preparation of the site for development of the proposed project should find nearby available habitats, including habitats within the Wetland Preserve and the 37-acre preserve on the adjacent property. The major wildlife corridor along No Name Creek will remain unaffected as the entirety of No Name Creek shall be incorporated into the Wetland Preserve. The proposed project would not result in substantial change in animal populations at the site, nor would it cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels.

Nesting Birds
Nesting bird species protected by the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) or California Fish and Game Code could be impacted during project construction. If construction occurs during the breeding season of migratory and resident birds (February 1 to August 31), MM BIO-4 would require a qualified Biologist conduct a pre-construction breeding bird survey in areas of suitable habitat within 15 days prior to the onset of construction activity in order to reduce any potential impacts to nesting birds to less than significant levels.

Water Quality
Construction activities for Phase 1 of the proposed project will occur within 0.496 acre of wetlands near areas within the upper reaches of No Name Creek. Construction of Phase 2 may affect 3.7 acres of wetlands near No Name Creek. However, implementation of a SWPPP, with identification of proper construction techniques and BMPs, would be required and would provide assurance that water quality of nearby waterways is not affected by on-site construction activities. Indirect impacts to resident animal populations in downstream areas would not result from the proposed project due to elevated turbidity levels from increased sedimentation or increases in other contaminants in stormwater runoff.
3809
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations The City finds that MM BIO-4 is feasible, is adopted, and will further reduce impacts related to biological resources. Accordingly, the City finds that, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(1) and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(1), changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project that mitigate or avoid the potentially significant impacts as identified in the EIR. Therefore, impacts associated with biology would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated.

Cumulative Impacts
The proposed project’s cumulative impacts related to biological resources would be less than significant. (Draft EIR, Page 4-5–7; Final EIR, vol. 2, Master Responses A and C).

Findings: Less than significant cumulative impact with mitigation incorporated (Draft EIR, Page 4-7). Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects as identified in the EIR (State CEQA Guidelines § 15091(a)(1)).

Mitigation Measures
MM BIO-1a, MM BIO-1b, MM BIO-1c, MM BIO BIO-1d, MM BIO-2, MM BIO-3a, MM BIO-3b, and MM BIO-4.

Facts in Support of Findings
The geographic scope of the cumulative biological resources analysis is a 0.5-mile radius of the project site. The project site is located at the transition between urban development and the marshes associated with the Napa River; accordingly, habitats in these areas tend to be disrupted and impacts would be localized.

The proposed project has the potential to impact special-status plant species and several specialstatus bird species, including Swainson’s hawk, golden eagle, northern harrier, and burrowing owl.

With the implementation of MM BIO-1a through MM BIO-2, impacts to these species as a result of development of the proposed project would be reduced to less than significant levels. Although there would be loss of foraging habitat, the cumulative loss of this resource would not be considerable due to the abundance of habitat in the American Canyon area. These mitigation measures would be consistent with other mitigation measures implemented for other projects within the local vicinity of the proposed project including the Devlin Road project and the Green Island Road Reconstruction and Widening project. With the implementation of these mitigation measures, any potentially significant cumulative impacts of the probable future projects in Table 4-1 of the Draft EIR, together with the proposed project, would be reduced to less than significant levels.

The proposed project would impact approximately 0.496 acres of palustrine emergent wetlands.

Plans for wetland mitigation, including the preservation of an approximately 44.8-acre Wetland Preserve, to include existing wetlands as well as established/created wetlands, are intended to offset wetland impacts of buildout development of the project site. No Name Creek is contained within the approximately 44.8-acre Wetland Preserve; no impacts to the palustrine emergent wetland swale associated with No Name Creek would occur from the proposed project in the area east of Devlin Road. No impacts would occur to areas that would be subject to California Department of Fish and 3810
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 62 Wildlife (CDFW) jurisdiction under Fish and Game Code Section 1602, therefore the development of the proposed project would not result in greater cumulative impacts to sensitive natural communities or riparian habitats.

The development of Phase 1 and 2 of the proposed project would impact 0.496 acres of palustrine emergent wetlands considered waters of the State under the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act as well as 0.004 acres of palustrine emergent wetlands considered waters of the United States.

As described in MM BIO-3a, these impacts would require that the applicant apply for and obtain a Nationwide Permit from the USACE and a Section 401 Water Quality Certification from the San Francisco Bay RWQCB for discharge within 0.004 acres of wetlands. The applicant would also need to apply for and obtain a separate Waiver of Waste Discharge from the San Francisco Bay RWQCB for impacts to 0.496 acres of waters of the State.

The development of Phase 2 of the proposed project would impact approximately 3.7 acres of wetlands considered both waters of the United States and State. These impacts would require that the applicant submit a separate application for an Individual Permit from USACE to include a plan to compensate for wetland losses as well as a detailed alternatives analysis under the Section 404(b)(1) guidelines to include a detailed evaluation of both on-site and off-site alternatives for the proposed project. Similar to Phase 1, these impacts would also require a Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 401 Water Quality Certification and a Waiver of Waste Discharge Requirements from the San Francisco Bay RWQCB, as described in MM BIO-3b.

As described in MM BIO-2, to compensate the loss of these wetlands an approximately 44.8-acre Wetland Preserve fronting the northern boundary of the project site would preserve 7.71 acres of existing wetlands and create approximately 4.7 acres of new wetlands within the Wetland Preserve.

The creation of this Wetland Preserve and new wetlands would help offset any significant cumulative impacts to jurisdictional wetlands by the proposed project or other projects listed in Table 4-1 of the Draft EIR and reduce them to less than significant levels overall.

The wildlife corridor along No Name Creek would remain unaffected by the development of the proposed project and would be entirely contained and incorporated into the Wetland Preserve.

Therefore, the proposed project would not result in substantial change in animal populations at the site, nor would it cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels. Additionally, the requirement for the implementation of a SWPPP would assure that water quality of nearby waterways is not affected by on-site construction activities. This mitigation measure would be consistent with other mitigation measure implemented for other projects listed in Table 4-1, including the Devlin Road project and the Green Island Road Reconstruction and Widening project.

As a result, the proposed project would not result in greater cumulative impacts to potential wildlife corridors.

The development of the proposed project does have the potential to impact nesting birds if construction includes the removal of vegetation occurs during the breeding season (February 1 to August 31). However, the implementation of MM BIO-4 would avoid direct and indirect impacts to nesting birds by requiring pre-construction nesting bird surveys and establishing buffer zones around any active nests. This mitigation measure would be consistent with other mitigation measures 3811
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations implemented for other projects listed in Table 4-1 of the Draft EIR, including the Devlin Road project and the Green Island Road Reconstruction and Widening project. With the implementation of MM BIO-4a, any cumulative impacts by the proposed project would be reduced to less than significant levels.

The City finds that MM BIO-1a, MM BIO-1b, MM BIO-1c, MM BIO BIO-1d, MM BIO-2, MM BIO-3a, MM BIO-3b, and MM BIO-4 are feasible, are adopted, and will further reduce cumulative impacts related to biological resources. Accordingly, the City finds that, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(1) and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(1), changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project that mitigate or avoid the potentially significant impacts as identified in the EIR. Therefore, direct and indirect cumulative impacts associated with biology would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated.

1.6.3 - Cultural Resources and Tribal Cultural Resources Potential Effect
Impact CUL-2: The proposed project could cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5 (Draft EIR Pages 3.4-21–22).

Findings: Less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated (Draft EIR, Page 3.4-22).

Mitigation Measures
MM CUL-2a No ground disturbance shall take place within 100 feet of informal archaeological resource 483A-001. The resource shall be preserved in place.

MM CUL-2b An Archaeologist who meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards for archaeology shall be present on-site during all earth disturbing activities. If prehistoric or historic-period archaeological resources are encountered, all construction activities within 100 feet of the find shall halt and the City of American Canyon shall be notified. Prehistoric archaeological materials may include obsidian and chert flaked stone tools (e.g., projectile points, knives, scrapers) or toolmaking debris; culturally darkened soil (“midden”) containing heat-affected rocks, artifacts, or shellfish remains; and stone milling equipment (e.g., mortars, pestles, hand stones, or milling slabs); and battered stone tools, such as hammerstones and pitted stones. Historic-period materials might include stone, concrete, or adobe footings and walls; filled wells or privies; and deposits of metal, glass, and/or ceramic refuse.

The Archaeologist shall inspect the findings within 24 hours of discovery. If it is determined the project could damage a historical resource or a unique archaeological resource (as defined pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines), mitigation shall be implemented in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21083.2 and Section 15126.4 of the CEQA Guidelines, with a preference for preservation in 3812
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 64 place. Consistent with Section 15126.4(b)(3), this may be accomplished through planning construction to avoid the resource; incorporating the resource within open space; capping and covering the resource; or deeding the site into a permanent conservation easement. If avoidance is not feasible, a qualified Archaeologist shall prepare and implement a detailed treatment plan in consultation with the City of American Canyon. Treatment of unique archaeological resources shall follow the applicable requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21083.2. Treatment for most resources would consist of (but would not be limited to) sample excavation, artifact collection, and site documentation, with the aim to target the recovery of important scientific data contained in the portion(s) of the significant resource to be impacted by the proposed project. The treatment plan shall include provisions for analysis of data in a regional context, reporting of results within a timely manner, curation of artifacts and data at an approved facility, and dissemination of reports to local and State repositories, libraries, and interested professionals.

Facts in Support of Findings
Records search results from the NWIC identified one informal archaeological resource (483A-001) within the project site and three prehistoric archaeological resources (P-28-000643, P-28-001156 and P-28-002458) located within the 0.5-mile records search radius. Additionally, the Sacred Lands Files search conducted by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) came back positive for TCRs within the project site. Resource 483A-001 is located within 44.8 acres of the project site that will remain undeveloped for the purposes of environmental conservation, and will not be subjected to any ground-disturbing activities. MM CUL-2a ensures that no ground disturbance shall take place within 100 feet of informal archaeological resource 483A-001. The resource shall be preserved in place.

No additional archaeological resources were encountered during the pedestrian field survey; however, poor soil visibility and the presence of several archaeological resources in the immediate vicinity increases the possibility of resources being encountered during project construction.

Implementation of MM CUL-2b requires a qualified Archaeologist to be present on-site during all earth disturbing activities, reducing potential impacts to archaeological resources that may be discovered during project construction. If a potential resource is identified, construction would be required to stop until appropriate identification and treatment measures are implemented.

The City finds that MM CUL-2a and MM CUL-2b are feasible, are adopted, and will further reduce impacts related to archaeological resources. Accordingly, the City finds that, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(1) and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(1), changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project that mitigate or avoid the potentially significant impacts as identified in the EIR. Therefore, impacts associated with archaeological resources would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. 3813
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations Potential Effect
Impact CUL-3: The proposed project could disturb human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries (Draft EIR Pages 3.4-23–24).

Findings: Less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated (Draft EIR, Page 3.4-23).

Mitigation Measures
MM CUL-3 In the event of the accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains, CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5, Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, and Public Resources Code Sections 5097.94 and Section 5097.98 shall be followed. If during project construction, there is accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains, the following steps shall be taken:

1. There shall be no further excavation or disturbance within 100 feet of the remains until the County Coroner is contacted to determine whether the remains are Native American and if an investigation of the cause of death is required. If the Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Coroner shall contact the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) within 24 hours, and the NAHC shall identify the person or persons it believes to be the Most Likely Descendant (MLD) of the deceased Native American. The MLD may make recommendations to the landowner or the person responsible for the excavation work within 48 hours, for means of treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains, and any associated grave goods as provided in Public Resource Code Section 5097.98.

2. Where the following conditions occur, the landowner or authorized representative shall rebury the Native American human remains and associated grave goods with appropriate dignity either in accordance with the recommendations of the MLD or on the project site in a location not subject to further subsurface disturbance:
• The NAHC is unable to identify an MLD or the MLD failed to make a recommendation within 48 hours after being notified by the commission. • The descendant identified fails to make a recommendation. • The landowner or authorized representative rejects the recommendation of the descendant, and mediation by the NAHC fails to provide measures acceptable to the landowner.

Additionally, California Public Resources Code Section 15064.5 requires the following relative to Native American Remains:
• When an initial study identifies the existence of, or the probable likelihood of, Native American Remains within a project, a lead agency shall work with the appropriate Native Americans as identified by the NAHC as provided in Public 3814
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 66 Resources Code Section 5097.98. The applicant may develop a plan with respect to their respective individual development proposals for treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains, and any items associated with Native American Burials with the appropriate Native Americans as identified by the NAHC.

Facts in Support of Findings
While no formal cemeteries or areas containing human remains are known to be in the project vicinity, the possibility always exists that construction-related ground disturbance may uncover previously undiscovered human remains. In the unlikely event such a discovery is made, CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5, Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, and Public Resources Code Sections 5097.94 and Section 5097.98 must be followed. Implementation of MM CUL-3, which details inadvertent discovery procedures, would reduce potential impacts to previously undiscovered human remains to a less than significant level.

The City finds that MM CUL-3 is feasible, is adopted, and will further reduce impacts related to previously undiscovered human remains. Accordingly, the City finds that, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(1) and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(1), changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project that mitigate or avoid the potentially significant impacts as identified in the EIR. Therefore, impacts associated with cultural resources would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated.

Potential Effect
Impact CUL-4: The proposed project may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a Tribal Cultural Resource (Draft EIR Pages 3.4-24–26).

Findings: Less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated (Draft EIR, Page 3.4-26).

Mitigation Measures
MM CUL-4 A Tribal Monitor representing the Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation shall be present during all project-related ground disturbance. Additionally, the Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation’s Treatment Protocol (Protocol) shall be followed with respect to Tribal Cultural Resources (TCRs). The purpose of the Protocol is to formalize procedures for the treatment of Native American human remains, grave goods, ceremonial items, and items of cultural patrimony, if any are found in conjunction with development, including archaeological studies, excavation, geotechnical investigations, grading, and any ground-disturbing activity. This Protocol also formalizes procedures for Tribal Monitoring during archaeological studies, grading, and ground-disturbing activities.
3815
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations

1. Cultural Affiliation: The Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation (Tribe) traditionally occupied lands in Yolo, Solano, Lake, Colusa, and Napa Counties. The Tribe has designated its Cultural Resources Committee (Committee) to act on the Tribe's behalf with respect to the provisions of this Protocol. Any human remains which are found in conjunction with projects on lands culturally affiliated with the Tribe shall be treated in accordance with Section III of this Protocol. Any other cultural resources shall be treated in accordance with Section IV of this Protocol.

2. Inadvertent Discovery of Native American Human Remains: Whenever Native American human remains are found during the course of a project, the determination of Most Likely Descendant (MLD) under California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 will be made by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) upon notification to the NAHC of the discovery of said remains at a project site. If the location of the site and the history and prehistory of the area is culturally affiliated with the Tribe, the NAHC contacts the Tribe; a Tribal member will be designated by the Tribe to consult with the landowner and/or project proponents. Should the NAHC determine that a member of an Indian tribe other than Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation is the MLD, and the Tribe agrees with this determination, the terms of this Protocol relating to the treatment of such Native American human remains shall not be applicable; however, that situation is very unlikely.

The Tribe shall have the final determination as to the disposition and treatment of human remains and grave goods. Said determination may include avoidance of the human remains, reburial on-site, or reburial on tribal or other lands that will not be disturbed in the future. The Tribe may wish to rebury said human remains and grave goods or ceremonial and cultural items on or near the site of their discovery, in an area which will not be subject to future disturbances over a prolonged period of time. Reburial of human remains shall be accomplished in compliance with the California Public Resources Code Sections 5097.98(a) and (b). The term "human remains" encompasses more than human bones because the Tribe’s traditions call for the burial of associated cultural items with the deceased (funerary objects), and/or the ceremonial burning of Native American human remains, funerary objects, grave goods, and animals. Ashes, soils, and other remnants of these burning ceremonies, as well as associated funerary objects and unassociated funerary objects buried with or found near the Native 3816
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 68 American Remains are to be treated in the same manner as bones or bone fragments that remain intact.

5. Treatment of Cultural Resources: Treatment of all cultural items, including ceremonial items and archaeological items will reflect the religious beliefs, customs, and practices of the Tribe. All cultural items, including ceremonial items and archaeological items, which may be found at a project site shall be turned over to the Tribe for appropriate treatment, unless ordered by a court or agency of competent jurisdiction. The project proponent shall waive any and all claims to ownership of Tribal ceremonial and cultural items, including archaeological items, which may be found on a project site in favor of the Tribe.

If any intermediary, (for example, an Archaeologist retained by the project proponent) is necessary, said entity or individual shall not possess those items for longer than is reasonably necessary, as determined solely by the Tribe.

Facts in Support of Findings
Records search results from the NWIC indicate several prehistoric sites are located within the project vicinity, and a review of the NAHC Sacred Lands File was positive for recorded TCRs being located within the project site. On February 9, 2021, a response was received from the Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation stating that the project site falls within the Tribe’s traditional use area and could impact known cultural resources important to the Tribe, constituting a significant impact. Implementation of Tribe-provided recommended mitigation measures and protocols, MM CUL-4, would reduce potential impacts to TCRs to a less than significant level. 3817
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations The City finds that MM CUL-4 is feasible, is adopted, and will further reduce impacts related to TCRs.

Accordingly, the City finds that, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(1) and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(1), changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project that mitigate or avoid the potentially significant impacts as identified in the EIR. Therefore, impacts associated with cultural resources would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated.

Potential Effect
Impact CUL-5: The proposed project may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource (Draft EIR Pages 3.4-26–27).

Findings: Less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated (Draft EIR, Page 3.4-27).

Mitigation Measures
MM CUL-2a, MM CUL-2b, MM CUL-3 and MM CUL-4.

Facts in Support of Findings
FCS sent letters containing project information and requesting any additional information to each tribal representative identified by the NAHC on February 8, 2021. A second follow up letter and/or email was sent on May 13, 2021. On May 21, 2021, a third and final attempt was made via phone call. On February 9, 2021, a response was received from the Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation stating that the project site falls within the Tribe’s traditional use area and could impact known cultural resources important to the Tribe. The Tribe provided recommended mitigation measures and protocols (MM CUL-4).

Tribal consultation pursuant to AB 52 has been initiated by the City of American Canyon and is ongoing. The City of American Canyon, in its capacity as Lead Agency, has not identified any TCRs within the project site that are significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. However, the possibility remains that TCRs in the form of subsurface archaeological resources or human remains may be encountered during project construction.

Implementation of MM CUL-2a, MM CUL-2b, MM CUL-3, and MM CUL-4 would require construction monitoring by a qualified Archaeologist and Native American Monitor. These measures would reduce potential impacts to TCRs to a less than significant level.

The City finds that MM CUL-2a and MM CUL-2b are feasible, are adopted, and will further reduce impacts related to archaeological resources. Accordingly, the City finds that, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(1) and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(1), changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project that mitigate or avoid the potentially significant impacts as identified in the EIR. Therefore, impacts associated with archaeological resources would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. 3818
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 70 Cumulative Impacts
With the implementation of mitigation, the proposed project would not result in a significant cumulative impact to cultural resources in the City of American Canyon or surrounding area. (Draft EIR, Page 4-7–8).

Findings: Less than significant cumulative impact with mitigation incorporated (Draft EIR, Page 4-8). Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects as identified in the EIR (State CEQA Guidelines § 15091(a)(1)).

Mitigation Measures
MM CUL-2a, MM CUL-2b, MM CUL-3 and MM CUL-4.

Facts in Support of Findings
The geographic scope of the cumulative cultural resources analysis is a 0.5-mile radius of the project site. Cultural resource impacts tend to be localized because the integrity of any given resource depends on what occurs only in the immediate vicinity around that resource, such as disruption of soils; therefore, in addition to the project site (including the off-site construction areas), the area near the project site would be the area most affected by project activities (generally within a 500- foot radius).

No listed historic or archaeological resources are within the project boundaries. Thus, none would be adversely impacted by project construction, therefore no cumulative impacts would occur within the City of American Canyon or its immediate vicinity. Construction activities associated with cumulative development projects in the project vicinity may have the potential to encounter undiscovered cultural resources. The cumulative projects listed in Table 4-1 of the Draft EIR would be required to mitigate impacts through compliance with applicable federal and State laws governing cultural resources.

Additionally, the implementation of standard construction mitigation measures would ensure undiscovered cultural resources are not adversely affected by project-related construction activities, which would prevent the destruction or degradation of potentially significant cultural resources in the project vicinity. Given the standard archaeological resources mitigation measures that would apply to the cumulative projects listed in Table 4-1 (including the proposed project), the cumulative impact related to archaeological resources would be less than significant with mitigation (MM CUL2a, 2b, and 3).

There is the possibility that previously undiscovered Tribal Cultural Resources (TCRs) could be encountered by subsurface earthwork activities associated with the cumulative projects; however, the implementation of MM CUL-4 would ensure that undiscovered TCRs are not adversely affected by cumulative project-related construction activities. Given the low potential for disruption, the standard conditions of approval, and mitigation measures that cumulative projects would be required to implement, the proposed project, in conjunction with other planned and approved projects, would result in a less than significant cumulative impact with mitigation related to TCRs. 3819
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations The City finds that MM CUL-2a, MM CUL-2b, MM CUL-3, and MM CUL-4, are feasible, are adopted, and will further reduce cumulative impacts related to cultural resources. Accordingly, the City finds that, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(1) and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(1), changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project that mitigate or avoid the potentially significant impacts as identified in the EIR. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in a significant cumulative impact to cultural resources in the City of American Canyon or surrounding area.

1.6.4 - Geology, Soils and Seismicity
Potential Effect
Impact GEO-1: The proposed project may expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects associated with seismic hazards (Draft EIR Pages 3.5-12–14).

Findings: Less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated (Draft EIR, Page 3.5-14).

Mitigation Measures
MM GEO-1a Prior to the issuance of building permits for each Phase 2 structure, the project applicant shall submit plans to the City of American Canyon for review and approval that demonstrate a minimum 50-foot setback between the West Napa Fault and each building. The approved plans shall be incorporated into the proposed project.

MM GEO-1b Prior to the issuance of building permits for each Phase 1 and 2 structure, the project applicant shall submit a design-level Geotechnical Investigation to the City of American Canyon for review and approval. The investigation shall be prepared by a qualified engineer and identify grading and building practices necessary to achieve compliance with the latest adopted edition of the California Building Standards Code (CBC) geologic, soils, and seismic requirements, including abatement of expansive soil conditions. The report shall also determine the final design parameters for walls, foundations, foundation slabs, and surrounding related improvements (e.g., utilities roadways, parking lots, and sidewalks). The measures identified in the approved report shall be incorporated into the project plans and all applicable constructionrelated permits.

Facts in Support of Findings
Fault Rupture
Phase 1
There are no active earthquake faults within Phase 1. For these reasons, Phase 1 of the proposed project would not be subject to fault rupture during a seismic event nor would it exacerbate exposure to fault rupture hazards.
3820
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 72 Phase 2
Cornerstone Earth Group conducted a Geological Fault Investigation in 2017 that identified the precise location of the West Napa Fault within Phase 2 of the project site. Pursuant to State law, a 50-foot setback must be established from the fault to the nearest building. Mitigation Measure (MM) GEO-1a requires the applicant to prepare and submit plans for Phase 2 when building permits are sought, demonstrating the required setbacks and ensuring that the proposed project does not exacerbate exposure to fault rupture hazards.

Strong Ground Shaking
Phases 1 and 2
Phase 1 is located in a seismically active region of California and is susceptible to strong ground shaking during a seismic event.

A design-level geotechnical report for the proposed project would be prepared by the time building permits are sought and would provide recommendations to minimize ground shaking hazards.

Accordingly, MM GEO-1b would require the applicant to submit such a study to the City of American Canyon for review and approval. Standard soil engineering and building design practices would include standards for foundations and structural support of buildings to ensure that they withstand strong ground shaking during a seismic event and avoid the exacerbation of exposure to such hazards. The implementation of this mitigation measure would ensure that the proposed project is not exposed to strong ground shaking hazards.

Ground Failure and Liquefaction
Phases 1 and 2
The Geotechnical Engineering Report determined that the project site is underlain by high plasticity soils, which are considered too stiff and dense to be susceptible to liquefaction. Thus, the proposed project would not be susceptible to ground failure, liquefaction, or liquefaction-related phenomena and impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation is required.

Landslides
Phases 1 and 2
The project site contains relatively flat relief, with an approximately 15-foot difference in elevation across the site. There are no slopes near the project site that may be susceptible to landslides during a seismic event. There is no potentially significant environmental impact and no mitigation is required.

The City finds that MM GEO-1a and MM GEO-1b are feasible, are adopted, and will further reduce impacts related to fault rupture and ground shaking. Accordingly, the City finds that, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(1) and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(1), changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project that mitigate or avoid the potentially significant impacts as identified in the EIR. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated.
3821
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations Potential Effect
Impact GEO-2: The proposed project may result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil (Draft EIR Pages 3.5-14–15).

Findings: Less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated (Draft EIR, Page 3.5-15).

Mitigation Measures
MM HYD-1a Prior to issuance of grading permits for the proposed project, the applicant shall submit to the City of American Canyon for review and approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) in accordance with the requirements of the statewide Construction General Permit. The SWPPP shall be designed to address the following objectives: (1) all pollutants and their sources (e.g., runoff), including sources of sediment associated with construction, construction site erosion, and all other activities associated with construction activity, are controlled; (2) where not otherwise required to be under a Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) permit, all non-stormwater discharges are identified and either eliminated, controlled, or treated; (3) site Best Management Practices (BMPs) (e.g., silt fencing, street sweeping, routine inspection, etc.) are effective and result in the reduction or elimination of pollutants in stormwater discharges and authorized non-stormwater discharges from construction activity; and (4) stabilization BMPs are installed to reduce or eliminate pollutants after construction are completed. The SWPPP shall be prepared by a qualified SWPPP developer. The SWPPP shall include the minimum BMPs required for the identified Risk Level. BMP implementation shall be consistent with the BMP requirements in the most recent version of the California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) Stormwater Best Management Handbook–Construction or the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Stormwater Quality Handbook Construction Site BMPs Manual. The SWPPP shall be implemented during construction.

Facts in Support of Findings
The proposed project would involve grading, building construction, paving, and utility installation activities that may cause erosion and sedimentation which could accumulate in downstream waterways, resulting in the blockage of flows, potentially causing increased localized ponding or flooding. MM HYD-1a in Section 3.8, Hydrology and Water Quality, of the Draft EIR would require the implementation of stormwater quality control measures during construction activities to prevent pollutants from entering downstream waterways.

The City finds that MM HYD-1a is feasible, is adopted, and will further reduce impacts related to erosion and sedimentation. Accordingly, the City finds that, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(1) and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(1), changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project that mitigate or avoid the potentially 3822
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 74 significant impacts as identified in the EIR. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated.

Potential Effect
Impact GEO-4: The proposed project may create substantial risks to life or property as a result of expansive soil conditions on the project site (Draft EIR Page 3.5-16).

Findings: Less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated (Draft EIR, Page 3.5-16).

Mitigation Measures
MM GEO-1b Prior to the issuance of building permits for each Phase 1 and 2 structure, the project applicant shall submit a design-level Geotechnical Investigation to the City of American Canyon for review and approval. The investigation shall be prepared by a qualified engineer and identify grading and building practices necessary to achieve compliance with the latest adopted edition of the California Building Standards Code (CBC) geologic, soils, and seismic requirements, including abatement of expansive soil conditions. The report shall also determine the final design parameters for walls, foundations, foundation slabs, and surrounding related improvements (e.g., utilities roadways, parking lots, and sidewalks). The measures identified in the approved report shall be incorporated into the project plans and all applicable constructionrelated permits.

Facts in Support of Findings
The Geotechnical Engineering Report found that the project site is underlain by soils with high clay content and are therefore capable of being expansive. The design-level Geotechnical Investigation required by MM GEO-1b would outline standard grading and soil engineering practices to abate these potential hazards.

The City finds that MM GEO-1b is feasible, is adopted, and will further reduce impacts related to expansive soils. Accordingly, the City finds that, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(1) and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(1), changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project that mitigate or avoid the potentially significant impacts as identified in the EIR. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated.

Potential Effect
Impact GEO-5: The proposed project may directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature (Draft EIR Page 3.5-16—17).

Findings: Less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated (Draft EIR, Page 3.5-17).

Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project 3823
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects as identified in the EIR (State CEQA Guidelines § 15091(a)(1)).

Mitigation Measures
MM GEO-5 If potential fossils are discovered during project implementation, all earthwork or other types of ground disturbance within 100 feet of the find shall stop immediately until a qualified professional Paleontologist can assess the nature and importance of the find. Based on the scientific value or uniqueness of the find, the Paleontologist shall either record the find and recommend that the City of American Canyon allow work to continue or recommend salvage and recovery of the fossil. The Paleontologist shall, if required, propose modifications to the stop-work radius based on the nature of the find, site geology, and the activities occurring on the site.

If treatment and salvage is required, recommendations will be consistent with Society of Vertebrate Paleontology guidelines and currently accepted scientific practice. If required, treatment for fossil remains shall include preparation and recovery of fossil materials so that they can be housed in an appropriate museum or university collection, and, if required, shall also include preparation of a report for publication describing the finds.

Facts in Support of Findings
The surface of the project site consists of Holocene fan deposits (Qf), Holocene–Pleistocene fan deposits (Qpf), early to middle Pleistocenefan or terrace deposits (Qoa), and the Pliocene Huichica Formation (Th). Also in the surrounding 0.5-mile radius (dashed outline) are modern artificial fill (af, afbm), Holocene–Pleistocene landslide deposits (Qls), the Plio-Pleistocene Petaluma Formation (Tsp), the Pliocene Sonoma Volcanics andesite (Tsv), and the Cretaceous Great Valley Sequence (Kgv).

Modern and Holocene deposits are too young to be fossiliferous, whereas andesite is a nonfossiliferous volcanic rock. Additionally, there are no recorded vertebrate or plant localities within Napa County.

For these reasons, the project site is not located in an area that is considered likely to have paleontological resources present. However, if significant paleontological resources are discovered, implementation of MM GEO-5 will reduce this potential impact to a less than significant level. There are no unique geologic features present on the project site or off-site development areas.

The City finds that MM GEO-5 is feasible, is adopted, and will further reduce impacts related to undiscovered paleontological resources. Accordingly, the City finds that, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(1) and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(1), changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project that mitigate or avoid the potentially significant impacts as identified in the EIR. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated.
3824
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 76 1.6.5 - Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Energy
Potential Effect
Impact GHG-1: The proposed project would generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment (Draft EIR Page 3.6-50—62).

Findings: Less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated (Draft EIR, Page 3.6-62).

Mitigation Measures
MM GHG-1a Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the project applicant shall provide the City of American Canyon with documentation (e.g., site plans) demonstrating project construction will include the following construction Best Management Practices (BMPs):
• At least 15 percent of the construction fleet for each project phase shall be alternatively fueled or electric.
• At least 10 percent of building materials used for project construction shall be sourced from local suppliers.
• At least 65 percent of construction and demolition waste materials shall be recycled or reused.
• At least one contractor that has a business location in American Canyon shall be contracted for project construction.
• All construction contracts shall include language that requires all off-road equipment with a power rating below 19 kilowatts (e.g., plate compactors, pressure washers) used during construction be electrically powered. • Architectural coatings used for project construction shall be “Low-VOC,” containing no greater than 50 grams of volatile organic compounds (VOC) per liter of product.
• Project construction shall prohibit the use of generators and shall establish grid power connection to electrical equipment needs.
• Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to 5 minutes (as required by the California Airborne Toxics Control Measure [ATCM] Title 13, Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations). Clear signage regarding idling restrictions shall be provided for construction workers at all access points.
• All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer’s specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified mechanic and determined to be running in proper condition prior to operation.
• The prime construction contractor shall post a publicly visible sign with their telephone number and contractor to contact. The construction contractor shall take corrective action within 48 hours. The Bay Area Air Quality Management 3825
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations District (BAAQMD) phone number shall also be identified and visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations.

MM GHG-1b Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the project applicant shall provide the City of American Canyon with documentation (e.g., site plans) demonstrating the proposed project is designed without the use of any natural gas -fueled appliances or natural gas plumbing.

MM GHG-1c Prior to issuance of any building permits, the project applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City of American Canyon (e.g., shown on site plans), that the proposed buildings are designed and will be built to, at a minimum, the Tier 2 advanced energy efficiency requirements of the Nonresidential Voluntary Measures of the California Green Building Standards Code, Division A5.2, Energy Efficiency, as outlined under Section A5.203.1.2.2.

MM GHG-1d Prior to issuance of any building permits, the project applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City of American Canyon (e.g., shown on site plans), that the proposed parking areas for passenger automobiles and trucks are designed and will be built to accommodate electric vehicle (EV) charging stations. At a minimum, the parking shall be designed to accommodate a number of EV charging stations equal to the Tier 2 Nonresidential Voluntary Measures of the California Green Building Standards Code, Section A5.106.5.3.2.

Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the project applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City of American Canyon (e.g., shown on site plans), that each loading dock is outfitted with at least one 240-volt outlet to accommodate truck and Transport Refrigeration Unit (TRU) charging and/or electrical power connection while trucks are loading and unloading goods.

MM GHG-1e Prior to the issuance of any building permit for the proposed project, the project applicant shall provide the City with documentation (e.g., site plans) demonstrating to the City’s satisfaction that the electricity demand will be supplied with 100 percent carbon-free electricity sources through the year 2045.

Facts in Support of Findings
The proposed project would generate GHG emissions during construction and operation. Neither the BAAQMD nor City have an emissions threshold for determining potentially significant impacts related to construction GHG emissions; therefore, the BAAQMD’s recommended GHG-reducing BMPs were utilized as the basis for determining the proposed project’s construction-related impact.

The proposed project would include the applicable GHG-reducing BMPs during construction through implementation of MM GHG-1a. MM GHG-1a notably has more construction BMPs than those recommended by the BAAQMD. The project applicant has identified these additional construction BMPs as feasible and applicable means to maximize GHG emission reductions during project construction; therefore, MM GHG-1a incorporates additional BMPs beyond those recommended by the BAAQMD to further the proposed project’s contribution to its “fair share” in GHG emission reductions during construction toward the State’s long-term climate goal of carbon neutrality by 3826
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 78 2045. Because MM GHG-1a would require the proposed project to meet and exceed implementation of the BAAQMD-recommended BMPs for reducing construction GHG emissions, project construction would be considered to commit its “fair share” of GHG emission reductions consistent with the State’s long-term climate goal of carbon neutrality and would therefore be less than significant.

GHG emissions associated with full operation of the proposed project for the anticipated first operation in 2023 are shown in Table 3.6-4 of the Draft EIR, which incorporates implementation of MMs AIR-2c and AIR-2d. As discussed in Section 3.2, Air Quality, of the Draft EIR, MM AIR-2c would be required to ensure the use of low-VOC (i.e., reactive organic gas [ROG]) architectural coating products that contain no more than 50 grams of VOC per liter of product to reduce the generation of ROG emissions during project operation. Any GHG emissions generated during architectural coating reapplication would be captured under area-source emissions as shown in Table 3.6-4 of the Draft EIR. As shown therein, area-source emissions generated during project operation would be less than

0.5 MT CO2e per year and was therefore rounded down to zero. As such, MM AIR-2c would result in a negligible effect on operational GHG emissions generated by the proposed project.

As discussed in Section 3.2, Air Quality of the Draft EIR, MM AIR-2d would be required to ensure the trucking fleet accessing the project site would be comprised of vehicles no older than model year 2014 to reduce tailpipe nitrogen oxide (NOX) emissions. Model year 2014 was selected because it is the first homogenous model year for a trucking fleet in Napa County, based on EMFAC2017 data, to demonstrate a reduction in NOX emissions when compared with unmitigated emission estimates.

This is considered a feasible trucking mitigation measure as the ARB’s Truck and Bus Regulation101 would otherwise require trucks greater than a 26,000-pound gross vehicle weight rating which operate in California to be no older than 2010 model year by the time the proposed project would become operational in 2023. This would allow the proposed project to utilize trucks which are 9 years old and would not constitute an infeasible financial burden.

While the trucking fleet serving the proposed project would represent the greatest GHG emission source during project operation, as illustrated in Table 3.6-4 of the Draft EIR, MM AIR-2d was determined to be the most feasible trucking mitigation to reduce tailpipe emissions of all types, including GHG emissions, due to the size of the trucking fleet. With over 500 trucks accessing the proposed project each day, the financial burden associated with implementing more stringent trucking mitigation is very likely to amount a cost greater than what a “prudent investor” would otherwise bear to develop the proposed project. In addition, the other principal emission source of passenger vehicles would not be possible to mitigate through project design as the operation of privately owned vehicles by employees and visitors would not be under the direct control of the proposed project.

Moreover, as discussed under Impact GHG-1, MMs GHG-1b through GHG-1e would ensure project consistency with the BAAQMD’s proposed 2022 GHG significance thresholds, as refined by the City, by prohibiting the use of natural gas infrastructure, complying with the Tier 2 EV charging infrastructure requirements of CALGreen, complying with the Tier 2 energy efficiency standards of CALGreen, and sourcing project electricity consumption from carbon-free sources. In addition, MMs GHG-1b through GHG-1e would reduce the proposed project’s reliance on fossil fuels and reduce the potential for wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources. 3827
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations Lastly, as discussed further under Impact GHG-1, the proposed project would demonstrate a 15 percent reduction in employee-generated VMT from the region’s existing employee VMT, consistent with the BAAQMD’s proposed 2022 GHG significance thresholds for VMT reductions for other identified land use types, including office uses, which the City has determined are similar to industrial uses. In addition, the proposed project’s trucking operations would be subject to incrementally more stringent tailpipe emission standards and fleet turnover requirements through various ARB programs and rules, further facilitating the use of EVs and reducing the generation of truck-generated GHG emissions. The City finds that MM GHG-1a through MM GHG-1e are feasible, are adopted, and will further reduce impacts related to GHG emissions. Accordingly, the City finds that, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(1) and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(1), changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project that mitigate or avoid the potentially significant impacts as identified in the EIR. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated.

Potential Effect
Impact GHG-3: The proposed project would not result in a potential significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources during project construction or operation. (Draft EIR Pages 6.6-69—73)
Findings: Less than significant impact (Draft EIR Page 3.6-72). Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects as identified in the EIR (State CEQA Guidelines § 15091(a)(1)).

Mitigation Measures
Implement Mitigation measures MM GHG-1a through MM GHG-1e.

Facts in Support of Findings
A significant impact would occur if the proposed project would result in the inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary use of energy.

Construction
The anticipated construction schedule for the proposed project was assumed to begin in January 2022 and conclude in August 2023. If the anticipated construction schedule moves to later years, construction energy demand would likely decrease because of improvements in technology and more stringent regulatory requirements. Project construction would require energy for the manufacture and transportation of building materials, preparation of the site (e.g., site clearing, and grading), and the actual construction of the building. Petroleum-based fuels such as diesel fuel and gasoline would be the primary sources of energy for these tasks. Construction equipment is estimated to consume a total of 51,911 gallons of diesel fuel and an estimated 337,528 gallons of gasoline and diesel would be consumed by vehicle travel during construction (Draft EIR, Appendix B).

Other equipment could include construction lighting, field services (office trailers), and electrically driven equipment such as pumps and other tools. Singlewide mobile office trailers are commonly used in construction staging areas. A typical 720-square-foot office trailer would consume 3828
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 80 approximately 20,152 kilowatt-hours (kWh) during the 20-month construction phase (Draft EIR, Appendix B).

The proposed project’s construction is not anticipated to result in unusually high energy use.

Limitations on idling of vehicles and equipment and requirements that equipment be properly maintained would result in fuel savings. Similarly, compliance with State regulations would limit idling from both on-road and off-road diesel-powered equipment and are enforced by the ARB.

Additionally, the overall construction schedule and process is already designed to be efficient to avoid excess monetary costs. For example, equipment and fuel are not typically used wastefully due to the added expense associated with renting the equipment, maintaining it, and fueling it.

Therefore, the opportunities for future efficiency gains during construction are limited. Therefore, it is anticipated that the construction phase of the proposed project would not result in wasteful, inefficient, and unnecessary consumption of energy.

Operation
Operation of the proposed project would consume an estimated 24,495,402 kWh of electricity and an estimated 9,060,000 kBTU of natural gas annually under the cold storage project scenario and an estimated 8,834,476 kWh of electricity and an estimated 8,260,000 kBTU of natural gas annually under the dry storage project scenario (Draft EIR, Table 3.6-7). As previously discussed, the proposed project would be considered to result in a potentially significant impact if it would result in wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources. Considering the guidance provided by Appendix F of the CEQA Guidelines and the Appellate Court decision in League to Save Lake Tahoe Mountain etc. v. County of Placer (2022) 75 Cal.App.5th 63, 164-168, the proposed project would be considered to result in wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources if it would conflict with the following energy conservation goals:
• Decreasing overall per capita energy consumption;
• Decreasing reliance on fossil fuels such as coal, natural gas, or oil; and • Increasing reliance on renewable energy sources.

Decreasing Overall Per Capita Energy Consumption
The proposed project would result in an approximately 29 percent reduction in employee VMT from regional average estimates, which would result in an overall decrease in per capita transportation energy consumption with respect to employee transportation energy resources. Trucking activities envisioned by the proposed project would be generally controlled by new technologies and the mandatory turnover of fleets through medium and heavy-duty truck emission standards and regulations (Draft EIR Pages 3.6-50—60). Moreover, the movement of freight goods and trucking and locomotive travel distances subsequent to that activity is largely dictated by market demand rather than the implementation of specific development projects. As such, the proposed project would not change overall energy consumption related to trucking and locomotive activities, and overall energy consumption related to employee transportation would decrease from the region’s current average employee transportation behavior.
3829
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations Because energy consumption data for the City is not available, County estimates were used to determine the proposed project’s per capita energy consumption. The County currently has estimated per capita energy consumption of 7,471 kWh and 28.45 MMBtu per year. The proposed project would result in up to 24,495,402 kWh per year and up to 9,060 MMBtu per year under a cold storage scenario starting in 2023 without considering any mitigation (Draft EIR, Table 3.6-7). The number of estimated employees is used to identify the proposed project’s per capita energy consumption. The proposed project’s estimated 3,643 employees would result in a per capita energy consumption of 6,724 kWh per year and 2.49 MMBtu per year, both of which would be below the County’s average electricity and natural gas consumption rates.

With implementation of MM GHG-1c, the proposed project is likely to consume less electricity than what is disclosed in Table 3.6-7 of the Draft EIR due to the required additional energy efficiency improvements and the fact that CalEEMod Version 2020.4.0 assumes minimum energy efficiency design compliance with the 2019 California Building Code. Should the permitting of the proposed project occur after January 1, 2023, the proposed project would be subject to additional energy efficiency standards beyond what is currently required at the time of this analysis. Nonetheless, implementation of MM GHG-1b would require the proposed project to implement an all-electric building design, likely resulting in greater electricity consumption than what would otherwise occur but reducing natural gas-related energy consumption by 100 percent, thereby contributing to the overall decrease in per capita energy consumption.

Decreasing Reliance on Fossil Fuels
The proposed project would be considered to conflict with this criterion if it did not take steps to decrease the reliance on fossil fuels. The implementation of MMs GHG-1a, GHG-1b, and GHG-1d would actively promote the proposed project’s decreased reliance on fossil fuels through the design and operation of the proposed project. MM GHG-1a would require the project applicant to utilize electric and alternatively fueled construction equipment and local contractors, among other requirements, which would reduce the proposed project’s commitment of fossil fuel energy resources during project construction. MM GHG-1b would require the proposed project to prohibit the installation of natural gas infrastructure, thereby precluding the proposed project’s future use of natural gas. Lastly, MM GHG-1d would require the proposed project to source 100 percent of its electricity from carbon-free sources.

Increasing Reliance on Renewable Energy Sources
As previously discussed, MM GHG-1a and MM GHG-1b would increase the proposed project’s reliance on renewable energy sources during project construction. MM GHG-1c would require the proposed project’s buildings be designed and constructed in accordance with the State’s Tier 2 Nonresidential Building Energy Efficiency Standards. The proposed project would also be designed to accommodate rooftop photovoltaic panel arrays should they be installed. MM GHG-1e would additionally require that the proposed project source its electricity consumption from carbon-free sources, either with on-site renewable generation technologies or through subscription with a 100 percent carbon-free electricity service with PG&E or MCE.

In addition, MM GHG-1d would require the proposed passenger vehicle and truck parking areas to accommodate more EV charging stations than would be required with minimum code compliance.

Loading docks would also be required to contain 240-volt outlets to accommodate EV and TRU 3830
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 82 charging for trucks. At a minimum, the parking shall be designed to accommodate EV charging stations in an amount equal to the Tier 2 Nonresidential Voluntary Measures of the California Green Building Standards Code, Section A5.106.5.3.2. As a result, the proposed project’s energy consumption would not be wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary.

The City finds that MM GHG-1a through MM GHG-1e are feasible, are adopted, and will further reduce impacts related to GHG emissions. Accordingly, the City finds that, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(1) and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(1), changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project that mitigate or avoid the potentially significant impacts as identified in the EIR. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated.

1.6.6 - Hydrology and Water Quality
Potential Effect
Impact HYD-1: Construction activities and changes to drainage patterns associated with the proposed project may degrade surface water quality in downstream water bodies (Draft EIR Page

3.8-10—12).

Findings: Less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated (Draft EIR, Page 3.8-12).

Mitigation Measures
MM HYD-1a Prior to issuance of grading permits for the proposed project, the applicant shall submit to the City of American Canyon for review and approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) in accordance with the requirements of the statewide Construction General Permit. The SWPPP shall be designed to address the following objectives: (1) all pollutants and their sources (e.g., runoff), including sources of sediment associated with construction, construction site erosion, and all other activities associated with construction activity, are controlled; (2) where not otherwise required to be under a Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) permit, all non-stormwater discharges are identified and either eliminated, controlled, or treated; (3) site Best Management Practices (BMPs) (e.g., silt fencing, street sweeping, routine inspection, etc.) are effective and result in the reduction or elimination of pollutants in stormwater discharges and authorized non-stormwater discharges from construction activity; and (4) stabilization BMPs are installed to reduce or eliminate pollutants after construction are completed. The SWPPP shall be prepared by a qualified SWPPP developer. The SWPPP shall include the minimum BMPs required for the identified Risk Level. BMP implementation shall be consistent with the BMP requirements in the most recent version of the California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) Stormwater Best Management Handbook–Construction or the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Stormwater Quality 3831
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations Handbook Construction Site BMPs Manual. The SWPPP shall be implemented during construction.

MM HYD-1b Prior to the issuance of building permits, the project applicant shall submit a Stormwater Control Plan to the City of American Canyon for review and approval.

The plan shall be developed using the California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) “New Development and Redevelopment Handbook” and include the applicable provisions of Section C.3 of the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Municipal Regional Permit (Order No. R2-2015-0049, NPDES Permit No. CAS612008 (or more recent permit). The Stormwater Control Plan shall identify pollution prevention measures and Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control stormwater pollution from operational activities and facilities and provide maintenance in perpetuity. The Stormwater Control Plan shall include Low Impact Development (LID) design concepts, as well as concepts that accomplish a “first flush” objective that would remove contaminants from the first 2 inches of stormwater before it enters area waterways. The project applicant shall also prepare and submit an Operations and Maintenance Agreement to the City, identifying procedures to ensure stormwater quality control measures work properly during operations.

Facts in Support of Findings
Phases 1 and 2
Chemicals, such as gasoline, diesel fuel, lubricating oil, hydraulic oil, lubricating grease, automatic transmission fluid, paints, solvents, glues, and other substances, could be used during construction and an accidental release of any of these substances could degrade the quality of the surface water runoff and adversely affect receiving waters. As such, MM HYD-1a would require the development and implementation of a SWPPP to outline site-specific stormwater quality control measures (such as Best Management Practices [BMPs]) during construction activities to prevent pollutants from entering downstream waterways.

The increase in impervious area increases the efficiency by which sediment and other pollutants are delivered downstream. Concentration of flow by the storm drain system could increase the erosive energy of flows, thereby increasing sediment supply from the project site. Runoff from landscaped areas may also contain residual pesticides and nutrients. Consequently, there is potential for longterm degradation of runoff water quality from the implementation of the project. The project proposes the following post-construction stormwater management features, according to a threetiered LID/BMP design approach:
• The purpose of site design BMPs is to maintain pre-development runoff characteristics, protect sensitive resource areas, and attempt to minimize new impervious areas. The site has been designed to limit the amount of disturbed area and new impervious areas. • Source control BMPs use structural controls and operational procedures to limit pollutants at their source. The project would implement the following source control BMPs: mark “No Dumping! Flows to River” on storm drain inlets; plumb interior floor drains to sanitary sewer; carefully manage pesticide use for landscaped areas; post “Do Not Dump Hazardous Materials 3832
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 84 Here” on refuse areas; utilize enclosed trash compactors; grade loading docks to minimize run-on and contain spills; and drain parking areas to bioretention planters. • Treatment control BMPs are designed to reduce the amount of pollutants in stormwater and to reduce runoff rates or volumes. All new impervious areas will be routed through either a bioretention basin or an infiltration planter. The floors of bioretention basins will be amended with a layer of gravel overlain by a layer of specialized biosoil. The biosoil will be a sandy loam material to promote infiltration while allowing for vegetation to establish. An underdrain will be installed to facilitate infiltration as the local soils have low infiltration potential.

Bioretention basins have been configured to drain within 48 hours to prevent vector concerns.

Additionally, the wetland preserve would facilitate the natural sequestration of stormwater pollutants leaving the project site.

MM HYD-1b would require (1) that the Stormwater Control Plan be reviewed and verified by the City of American Canyon to ensure the proposed stormwater controls are adequate pursuant to the requirements of Order No. R2-2015-0049 (or more recent permit), and (2) that an operation and maintenance program is in place to ensure the long-term functionality of the stormwater controls.

Various RWQCBs determined that BMPs in MM HYD-1b are known to be effective in protecting receiving waters.

The City finds that MM HYD-1a and MM HYD-1b are feasible, are adopted, and will further reduce impacts related to surface water quality. Accordingly, the City finds that, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(1) and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(1), changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project that mitigate or avoid the potentially significant impacts as identified in the EIR. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated.

1.6.7 - Land Use
Potential Effect
Impact LU-3: The proposed project may conflict with the applicable provisions of the Napa County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (Draft EIR Page 3.9-49—52).

Findings: Less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated (Draft EIR, Page 3.9-42).

Mitigation Measures
MM AES-3 and MM LU-3
MM LU-3 Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall retain a qualified Biologist to assess potential wildlife hazards to aviation. The assessment shall evaluate the characteristics of the emergent wetlands, drainages, other potential wildlife attractant features (i.e., ponded water) located within the open space area and 3833
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations identify management practices (e.g., storm drainage, vegetation, etc.) to prevent the creation of attractants for large flocks or birds or other wildlife species that may present safety hazards to aviation activities. As part of the assessment, the applicant shall consult with Napa County Airport and Napa County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) representatives, as appropriate, regarding findings and recommendations. The applicant shall submit a report to the City of American Canyon prepared by a qualified Biologist that confirms the wildlife hazard assessment’s findings and recommendations are incorporated into the design of the open space preserve.

Facts in Support of Findings
Phases 1 and 2
Airport Land Use Compatibility Review
The project site falls within the Napa County ALUCP Area.

The (ALUCP) establishes policies and compatibility zones addressing four key focus areas: noise, safety, airspace protection, and overflight. The project site falls entirely within Zone D. Zone D encompasses the common traffic pattern. These areas are routinely overflown by aircraft. Zone D is characterized by moderate risk, frequent noise intrusion and routine overflights below 1,000 feet above ground level.

Within Zone D, indoor uses are limited to densities of no more than 100 people per net acre. Uses with an outdoor component can have up to 150 people per net acre. The ALUCP does not limit the number of people that can be clustered in any one acre of the parcel within Zone D.

Additionally, the ALUCP prohibits residential uses and uses posing hazards to flight. Hazards to flight include objects that penetrate FAR Part 77 airspace surfaces, uses that would attract large numbers of birds, and uses that would create smoke, glare, distracting lights, or electronic interference.

Maximum Density
The proposed project includes several buildings that would facilitate development of industrial uses, including warehousing, manufacturing, and general office uses. These land uses are generally consistent with ALUCP criteria, provided that the uses do not attract large concentrations of people.

The ALUCP sets forth a maximum density criterion of 100 people per net acre for Zone D. The ALUCP identifies three methods for calculating density: (1) parking ordinance; (2) maximum occupancy; and (3) other methodologies in cases where density cannot be reasonably estimated based upon parking or square footage.

The maximum occupancy methodology is most appropriate because it is based on typical Building Code occupancy limits, which can be calculated based on the known project characteristics. Because the ancillary office space within each building is the most intense use, it has been broken out separately from the warehouse use.2 Table 3.9-3 of the Draft EIR summarizes the maximum occupancy calculation.

The project complies with the density recommendation of no more than 100 persons per net acre (Draft EIR, 3.9-4).
3834
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 86 Wildlife Attractants
The two aspects of the proposed project that have the greatest potential for creating aviation safety hazards are the open space area and the stormwater basins.

As previously discussed, a 45-acre Wetland Preserve will be established as part of the proposed project. This area contains wetlands that currently attract wildlife (e.g., avian species). Avian species are considered potential hazards to aviation activities due to the potential for bird strikes. The proposed project would create new wetland features to offset those impacted as result of the proposed project. However, it would not substantially increase the bird attractant potential because the new compensatory wetlands represent a small portion of the total open space area. Thus, the proposed project would not introduce new aviation hazards in this respect.

The proposed stormwater basins would be designed to drain out within 48 hours of a 10-year storm event, minimizing the amount of time the basins would hold standing water. This would reduce their avian attractant attributes. Additionally, basins would not represent a greater attractant than standing water in the project vicinity during and immediately after a storm event.

Furthermore, the proposed project would result in an approximately 163-acre reduction in avian foraging habitat as a result of the development of the proposed structures and infrastructure. The proposed project also would include landscaping and on-site drainage facilities that would be designed and managed to discourage wildlife use of the site. This would further minimize the avian attractant attributes of the project site relative to existing conditions.

Overall, the proposed project would not increase the avian attractant attributes of the project site or nearby areas under the Napa County Airport flight path compared to existing conditions.

The ALUCP indicates that projects that have the potential to attract wildlife are required to prepare a Wildlife Hazards Assessment and MM LU-3 would require the preparation of such an assessment and implementation of the recommendations into the design of the open space area.

Light, Glare, Dust, Steam, and Other Aviation Hazards
The ALUCP Policy 3.3.5 states the following:

Policy 3.3.5 Land uses which may produce hazards to aircraft in flight shall not be permitted within any airport's planning area. Specific characteristics to be avoided include: (1) glare or distracting lights which could be mistaken for airport lights; (2) sources of dust, steam, or smoke which may impair pilot visibility; (3) sources of electrical interference with aircraft communications or navigation; and (4) any use which may attract large flocks of birds, especially landfills and certain agricultural uses.

MM AES-3 requires all exterior lighting to use full cut-off fixtures and be directed downward to prevent interference with Napa County Airport operations. Together, the implementation of these two mitigation measures would ensure that the proposed project would not create hazards to aviation.

The City finds that MM AES-3 and MM LU-3 are feasible, are adopted, and will further reduce impacts related to land use. Accordingly, the City finds that, pursuant to Public Resources Code 3835
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations Section 21081(a)(1) and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(1), changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project that mitigate or avoid the potentially significant impacts as identified in the EIR. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated.

1.6.8 - Noise
Potential Effect
Impact NOI-1: The proposed project could generate a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in noise-sensitive locations in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies (Draft EIR Page 3.10-15—22).

Findings Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated (Draft EIR, Page 3.10-22).

Mitigation Measures
MM NOI-1 Implementation of the following multi-part mitigation measure is required to reduce potential construction period noise impacts:
• The construction contractor shall ensure that all equipment driven by internal combustion engines shall be equipped with mufflers that are in good condition and appropriate for the equipment.
• The construction contractor shall ensure that unnecessary idling of internal combustion engines (i.e., idling in excess of 5 minutes) is prohibited. • The construction contractor shall utilize “quiet” models of air compressors and other stationary noise sources where technology exists. • At all times during project grading and construction, the construction contractor shall ensure that stationary noise-generating equipment shall be located as far as practicable from sensitive receptors and placed so that emitted noise is directed away from adjacent residences.
• The construction contractor shall ensure that the construction staging areas shall be located to create the greatest feasible distance between the staging area and noise-sensitive receptors nearest the project site.
• The construction contractor shall ensure that all on-site construction activities, including the operation of any tools or equipment used in construction, drilling, repair, alteration, grading, or demolition work, are limited to between the daytime hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday. No construction shall be permitted on Sundays and federal holidays. 3836
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 88 Facts in Support of Findings
Construction
A significant impact would occur if construction noise impacts were greater than 75 dBA between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. or greater than 60 dBA from 7:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m., per the City’s policies, and would result in a substantial temporary increase in ambient noise levels that could result in annoyance or sleep disturbance of nearby sensitive receptors.

Construction-related Traffic Noise
Short-term noise impacts could result from the transport of workers and construction equipment and materials to and from the project site. This would incrementally increase noise levels on access roads leading to the site. Because workers and construction equipment would use existing routes, noise from passing trucks would be similar to existing vehicle-generated noise on these local roadways. Typically, a doubling of the Average Daily Traffic (ADT) hourly volumes on a roadway segment is required in order to result in an increase of 3 dBA in traffic noise levels. This is the lowest change that can be perceptible to the human ear in outdoor environments. Project-related construction trips would not be expected to double the hourly or daily traffic volumes along any roadway segment in the project vicinity. For this reason, short-term intermittent noise from construction trips would not be expected to result in a perceptible increase in hourly or daily average traffic noise levels in the project vicinity.

Construction Equipment Operational Noise
Short-term noise impacts could result from construction activity related to the proposed project.

Similarities in the dominant noise sources and patterns of operation allow construction-related noise ranges to be categorized by work phase.

The site preparation phase involves the use of earthmoving equipment, which tends to generate the highest noise levels. Typical operating cycles for these types of construction equipment may involve 1 or 2 minutes of full power operation followed by 3 or 4 minutes at lower power settings.

Construction of the project is expected to require the use of scrapers, bulldozers, water trucks, haul trucks, and pickup trucks. The maximum noise level generated by each scraper, bulldozer and grader is assumed to be 85 dBA Lmax at 50 feet from this equipment. (Draft EIR, Table 3.10-2). Each doubling of sound sources with equal strength increases a sound level by 3 dBA. Thus, a reasonable worstcase combined noise level during this phase of construction would be 90 dBA Lmax at a distance of 50 feet from the acoustic center of a construction area. This would result in a reasonable worst-case hourly average of 86 dBA Leq.

The closest façade of the closest noise-sensitive receptor to the project site would be located 1,240 feet from the acoustic center of construction activity where multiple pieces of heavy construction equipment would operate simultaneously during construction of the proposed parking areas near the project’s northeastern boundary. At this distance, construction noise levels could range up to approximately 62 dBA Lmax, with a relative worst-case hourly average of 57 dBA Leq at this receptor.

These noise levels could occur temporarily.
3837
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations These construction noise levels are within the construction noise limits established by the City of no greater than 75 dBA during the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.; but these levels could exceed the City’s nighttime threshold for construction noise of 60 dBA. Thus, MM NOI-1 would require all onsite construction activities be limited to between the daytime hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. MM NOI-1 would further reduce impacts from construction noise by requiring mufflers on construction equipment powered by internal engines. MM NOI-1 also would require contractors to limit idling times of vehicles with internal combustion engines to 5 minutes or less and utilize quiet mode on air compressors and other stationary noise sources. Furthermore, MM NOI-1 would require contractors to locate stationary noise-generating equipment as far away as the equipment allows and also be placed such that noise is directed away from adjacent residential homes.

Operation
Implementation of the project would result in mobile and stationary operational noise sources.

Mobile Source Operational Noise Impacts
A significant impact would occur if implementation of the proposed project would result in a substantial increase in traffic noise levels compared with traffic noise levels existing without the project. A change of 5 dBA is considered the minimum readily perceptible change to the human ear in outdoor environments. Therefore, for purposes of this analysis, a 3 dBA or greater increase above traffic noise levels that would exist without the project would be considered a substantial permanent increase in traffic noise levels.

The traffic study prepared by W-Trans concluded that the highest traffic noise level increase with implementation of the proposed project would occur along South Kelly Road under Existing Plus Project conditions and would result in traffic noise levels ranging up to 59.1 dBA Ldn as measured at 50 feet from the centerline of the nearest travel lane, representing an increase of 2.5 dBA over existing conditions for this roadway segment (Draft EIR, Table 3.10-6). This increase is less than a 3 dBA or greater increase that would be considered a substantial increase.

Stationary Source Operational Noise Impacts
A significant impact would occur if operational noise levels generated by stationary noise sources at the proposed project site would result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in excess of the City’s noise performance standards. The City requires that new industrial, commercial, and related land uses demonstrate that they would not directly cause ambient noise levels to exceed an exterior Ldn of 65 dBA in areas containing housing, schools, health care facilities, or other “noisesensitive” land uses.

Parking Lot Activities
The proposed project would generate noise from parking lot activities. Typical parking lot activities generate noise levels ranging from approximately 60 dBA to 70 dBA Lmax at 50 feet.

The closest façade of the nearest noise-sensitive receptor to the project site would be located 1,360 feet southwest of the nearest proposed parking areas. Noise levels associated with daily parking lot activities would attenuate to approximately 41 dBA Lmax at this façade. Assuming a reasonable worstcase scenario of one parking movement for every parking stall within a single hour would result in an hourly average noise level of 24 dBA Leq as measured at this nearest façade. If these noise levels 3838
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 90 were to occur every hour for a 24-hour period, they would result in a reasonable worst-case average noise level of 30 dBA Ldn as measured at this nearest receptor (Draft EIR, Appendix G).

Therefore, the proposed project’s reasonable worst-case parking lot noise levels would not cause ambient noise levels to exceed an exterior Ldn of 65 dBA as measured at the nearest receptor.

Existing traffic noise levels along Green Island Road are 62 dBA Ldn (Draft EIR, Table 3.10-6).

Therefore, project parking lot activities would not result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity.

Mechanical Equipment Operations
The proposed project would generate noise from new exterior mechanical equipment sources. A reference noise level for typical rooftop mechanical ventilation systems was used. Noise levels from commercially available rooftop mechanical ventilation equipment range from 50 dBA to 60 dBA Leq at a distance of 25 feet.

The closest façade of the nearest noise-sensitive receptor to the project site would be located approximately 1,470 feet southwest of the nearest potential location for proposed rooftop mechanical ventilation equipment. At this distance, noise generated by typical rooftop mechanical ventilation equipment would attenuate to below 22 dBA Leq at the nearest façade. If these noise levels were to occur every hour for a 24-hour period, they would result in a reasonable worst-case average noise level of 29 dBA Ldn as measured at this nearest receptor (Draft EIR, Appendix G).

Therefore, the proposed project’s reasonable worst-case mechanical ventilation equipment operation noise levels would not cause ambient noise levels to exceed an exterior Ldn of 65 dBA as measured at the nearest receptor. As discussed above, existing traffic noise levels along Green Island Road are 62 dBA Ldn. Therefore, noise levels from proposed mechanical ventilation equipment operations would not result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity.

Truck Loading Activities
Noise would be also generated by truck loading and unloading activities at the loading docks along the western side of the proposed building and at the proposed surface level loading areas on the north and south sides of the building. Typical maximum noise levels from truck loading and unloading activity are 70 dBA Lmax as measured at 50 feet.

The closest façade of the nearest noise-sensitive receptor to the project site would be located approximately 1,600 feet from the nearest loading docks. Assuming a reasonable worst-case scenario of one truck loading operation for every loading stall and every loading dock within a single hour would result in an hourly average noise level of 40 dBA Lmax and 29 dBA Leq as measured at the nearest façade of the residence. If these noise levels were to occur every hour for a 24-hour period, they would result in a reasonable worst-case average noise level of 35 dBA Ldn as measured at this nearest receptor (Draft EIR, Appendix G).

The proposed project’s reasonable worst-case truck loading/unloading activity noise levels would not cause ambient noise levels to exceed an exterior Ldn of 65 dBA as measured at the nearest receptor. As discussed above, existing traffic noise levels along Green Island Road are 62 dBA Ldn. 3839
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations Therefore, project truck loading/unloading activities would not result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity.

Stationary Source Operational Noise Impact Conclusion
None of the project stationary operational noise sources would result in an increase of 3 dBA or greater above the City’s performance threshold of 65 dBA Ldn for stationary noise sources as measured at the nearest sensitive receptor. Table 3.10-7 of the Draft EIR provides a summary of the stationary source operation noise impacts.

The City finds that MM NOI-1 is feasible, is adopted, and will further reduce impacts related to noise.

Accordingly, the City finds that, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(1) and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(1), changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project that mitigate or avoid the potentially significant impacts as identified in the EIR. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated.

1.7 - Impacts Identified in the Draft EIR as Being Significant and Unavoidable Even After the Incorporation of All Feasible Mitigation Measures The Lead Agency hereby finds that, despite the incorporation of feasible mitigation measures outlined in the EIR and the attached MMRP, the following impacts from the proposed project and related approvals cannot be fully mitigated to a less than significant level and a Statement of Overriding Considerations is therefore included herein. There are no feasible mitigation measures, including those proposed by parties who submitted comments on the Draft EIR, that can reduce these impacts to less than significant levels.

1.7.1 - Air Quality
Impact AIR-1: The proposed project would conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan (Draft EIR Pages 3.2-38–45; Final EIR, vol. 2, Page 4-1).

Findings: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects as identified in the EIR. (State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15091(a)(1).) However, impacts would still remain significant and unavoidable even with mitigation incorporated. Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measure or project alternatives identified in the EIR. (State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15091(a)(3).) (Draft EIR, Page 3.2-45).

Mitigation Measures
MM AIR-2a The following Best Management Practices (BMPs), as recommended by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD), shall be included in the design of the project and implemented during construction:
• All active construction areas shall be watered at least two times per day. 3840
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 92 • All exposed non-paved surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and access roads) shall be watered at least three times per day and/or non-toxic soil stabilizers shall be applied to exposed non-paved surfaces. • All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off-site shall be covered and/or shall maintain at least 2 feet of freeboard. • All visible mud or dirt tracked out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited.
• All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 miles per hour. • All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. Building pads shall be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used.
• Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to 5 minutes (as required by the California Airborne Toxics Control Measure (ATCM) Title 13, Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations). Clear signage regarding idling restrictions shall be provided for construction workers at all access points.
• All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer’s specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified mechanic and determined to be running in proper condition prior to operation.
• The prime construction contractor shall post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact regarding dust complaints. The City and the construction contractor shall take corrective action within 48 hours. The BAAQMD’s phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations.

MM AIR-2b Prior to the issuance of grading or building permits, the project applicant shall provide the City with documentation demonstrating the use of “Low-VOC” architectural coatings during the proposed project's construction. “Low-VOC” architectural coatings used during project construction shall not exceed 50 grams of reactive organic gases (ROG) or volatile organic compounds (VOC) per liter of product.

MM AIR-2c Prior to issuing any certificate of occupancy for the proposed project, the project applicant shall provide the City with documentation demonstrating the use of “LowVOC” architectural coatings and electric landscaping equipment during the operation of the proposed project. “Low-VOC” architectural coatings used during project operation shall not exceed 10 grams of reactive organic gases (ROG) or volatile organic compounds (VOC) per liter of product. Landscaping equipment referred to in this requirement shall include lawnmowers, leaf blowers, and chainsaws.

MM AIR-2d Prior to issuing the certificate of occupancy for the proposed project, the project applicant shall provide the City with documentation demonstrating the use of a 3841
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations truck fleet that meets or exceeds model year 2014 for all heavy-duty trucks during operation of the proposed project. If the project applicant does not own the truck fleet that would be used during operation of the proposed project, the project applicant shall provide the City with documentation from the truck fleet owner or operator demonstrating that trucks utilized for operation of the proposed project will meet or exceed model year 2014. If any change occurs where a new truck fleet is utilized during operation of the proposed project, the project applicant shall provide the City with documentation demonstrating that the new truck fleet meets or exceeds this requirement.

To monitor and ensure that trucks that meet a model year of 2014 or newer are used for the proposed project, the fleet operator shall maintain records of all trucks and equipment associated with the proposed project’s operation and make these records available to the City upon request. Alternatively, the City may require periodic reporting and provision of written records by operators and conduct regular inspections of the records to the maximum extent feasible and practicable.

MM AIR-2e Prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy for each building with dock doors, signage shall be posted identifying idling restrictions and contact information to report violations to the building manager.

MM AIR-2f Prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy for each building with a separate end user, the City shall confirm that the end user has prepared a Transportation Demand Management Plan (TDM Plan). The TDM Plan shall be prepared by a qualified transportation consultant and identify strategies to reduce single-occupant vehicle trips. Examples of TDM strategies may include but are not limited to:
• Ridesharing/Ride Matching
• Vanpools
• Transit subsidies
• Preferential parking for rideshare or vanpool vehicles • Employee lockers
• Secure bicycle parking
• Employee locker rooms
• Provide TDM information in employee breakroom
MM AIR-2g As a part of future lease agreements, the project proponent shall provide all future tenants at the project site information on available California Air Resources Board (ARB) and Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) incentive programs, such as the Carl Moyer Program and the Voucher Incentive Program, that support upgrading truck fleets to clean air technology equipment.

Facts in Support of Findings
The BAAQMD 2017 Clean Air Plan is a regional and multiagency effort to reduce air pollution in the Air Basin. A consistency determination with the 2017 Clean Air Plan fulfills the CEQA goal of 3842
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 94 informing decision-makers of the proposed project's environmental effects under consideration early enough to ensure that air quality concerns are fully addressed.

In part, the regional population, housing, and employment projections developed by the ABAG for the San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin (SFAAB) are based on cities’ general plan land use designations.

These projections form the foundation for the emissions inventory of the 2017 Clean Air Plan.

Projects consistent with the local general plan are considered consistent with the regional air quality plan. The project site is designated “Industrial” by the City of American Canyon General Plan and zoned “General Industrial.” The proposed project is consistent with these General Plan land use designations. Thus, the proposed project would generally be consistent with the underlying general plan land use designation and would not have the potential to substantially affect housing, employment, and population projections in the region that are the basis of the 2017 Clean Air Plan projections. The proposed project would not conflict with the control measures of the 2017 Clean Air Plan (Draft EIR, Table 3.2-9).

The BAAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Guidelines further recommend determining a project’s consistency with the 2017 Clean Air Plan, in part, by determining a project’s consistency with the significance thresholds presented in Table 3.2-7 of the Draft EIR. As discussed under Impact AIR-2 below, the proposed project would generate emissions which exceed the BAAQMD’s significance thresholds after the implementation of applicable and feasible mitigation and would result in a significant and unavoidable impact. As discussed below under Impact AIR-2, implementation of MM AIR-2a and MM AIR-2b would sufficiently reduce project construction emissions to less than significant levels.

Implementation of MM AIR-2c and MM AIR-2d would not be sufficient to reduce project operation emissions to less than significant levels.

As discussed under Impact AIR-2, unmitigated project operation would result in ROG and NOX emissions which exceed BAAQMD significance thresholds. NOX emissions generated during project operation would principally be generated by the operation of the trucking fleet, irrespective of whether the fleet would accommodate the use of TRUs. MM AIR-2d would be required to ensure the trucking fleet accessing the project site would be comprised of vehicles no older than model year 2014 to reduce tailpipe NOX emissions. MM AIR-2e would require that anti-idling signage be posted in loading dock areas. MM AIR-2f requires that a TDM Program be implemented.

As discussed further in Impact AIR-2 below, implementation of MM AIR-2c would result in a reduction of ROG emissions under both dry storage and cold storage scenarios; however, these emissions would still exceed the BAAQMD significance thresholds for ROG emissions of 10 tons per year and 54 average pounds per day. Furthermore, as discussed in Impact AIR-2, with the implementation of MM AIR-2d, NOX emissions during project operation would be reduced under both dry storage and cold storage scenarios; however, emissions would still exceed the BAAQMD significance thresholds for NOX emissions of 10 tons per year and 54 average pounds per day.

Because the proposed project would generate emissions which exceed the BAAQMD’s significance thresholds and BAAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Guidelines recommend determining a project’s consistency with the 2017 Clean Air Plan, in part, by determining a project’s consistency with the 3843
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations BAAQMD significance thresholds, the proposed project would be inconsistent with the 2017 Clean Air Plan.

The City finds that MM AIR-2a through MM AIR-2g are feasible, are adopted, and will reduce impacts to the greatest extent feasible. However, impacts would still remain significant and unavoidable even with mitigation incorporated.

Impact AIR-2: The proposed project would result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is nonattainment under an applicable deferral or State ambient air quality standard (Draft EIR Pages 3.2-45–59).

Mitigation Measures
MM AIR-2a, MM AIR-2b, MM AIR-2c, MM AIR-2d, MM AIR-2e, MM AIR-2f and MM AIR-2g.

Facts in Support of Findings
This impact is related to the cumulative effect of a project’s regional criteria pollutant emissions. The cumulative analysis focuses on whether a specific project would result in cumulatively considerable emissions. According to Section 15064(h)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines, the existence of significant cumulative impacts caused by other projects alone does not constitute substantial evidence that the project’s incremental effects would be cumulatively considerable. Rather, the determination of cumulative air quality impacts for construction and operational emissions is based on whether the project would result in regional emissions that exceed the BAAQMD regional thresholds of significance for construction and operations on a project level. A project that would not exceed the BAAQMD thresholds of significance on the project level also would not be considered to result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to these regional air quality impacts.

Construction
Construction Fugitive Dust
The BAAQMD bases the determination of significance for fugitive dust on a consideration of the BMPs to be implemented. If all appropriate emissions control measures are implemented for a project as recommended by the BAAQMD, then fugitive dust emissions during construction are not considered significant. MM AIR-2a would ensure implementation of construction BMPs recommended by the BAAQMD irrespective of the emissions reductions achieved by those BMPs.

With this mitigation measure, short-term construction fugitive dust impacts would be less than significant.
3844
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 96 Construction Air Pollutant Emissions: ROG, NOX, PM10, PM2.5 CalEEMod, Version 2020.4.0, was used to estimate the proposed project’s construction emissions.

Estimated construction emissions are compared with the applicable thresholds of significance established by the BAAQMD to assess ROG, NOX, exhaust PM10, and exhaust PM2.5 construction emissions to determine significance for this impact. As the BAAQMD dust control measures would be required to ensure fugitive dust impacts are less than significant, the emission estimates shown below account for the implementation of MM AIR-2a.

ROG emissions generated mainly during architectural coating activities during project construction would exceed BAAQMD significance thresholds (Draft EIR, Table 3.2-10), requiring the implementation of MM AIR-2b, which would require the use of low-VOC (i.e., ROG) architectural coating products during project construction. MM AIR-2b would result in reducing ROG emissions from 68 average pounds per day to 33 average pounds per day, which is below the BAAQMD significance threshold of 54 pounds per day for ROG emissions during project construction (Draft EIR, Table 3.2-11). Therefore, project construction emissions would be less than significant with the implementation of MMs AIR-2a and AIR-2b.

Operation
Operational Air Pollutant Emissions: ROG, NOX, PM10, PM2.5 Operational emissions would include area, energy, and mobile sources. Area sources would include emissions from architectural coatings, consumer products, and landscape equipment. Energy sources include emissions from the combustion of natural gas for water heaters and other heat sources. Mobile sources include exhaust and road dust emissions from the automobiles that would travel to and from the project site. Mobile sources also include exhaust from trailer-mounted TRUs which would accompany any freight truck carrying refrigerated goods. Stationary sources include emissions from stationary source equipment, such as backup generators, that would require a permit issued by the BAAQMD. Pollutants of concern include ROG, NOX, PM10, and PM2.5.

Project operations were analyzed at full buildout immediately following the completion of construction for Phase 2 in August 2023 as a conservative estimate of operational emissions beginning in the earliest year of full operation.

The cold storage project scenario would also include the operation of TRUs, which are analyzed using weighted averages for emission factors retrieved from the ARB’s OFFROAD2017 database for in-state truck TRUs, in-state van TRUs, in-state gen-set TRUs, in-state trailer TRUs, out-of-state gen-set TRUs, out-of-state trailer TRUs, and locomotive TRUs, all utilizing aggregate horsepower bins. These vehicle categories encompass all possible TRU emission factors contained in the database. Each truck is assumed to be accompanied by a TRU and each of the 528 truck trips is one-way, this analysis assumes a truck and TRU population of 266. Each TRU is assumed to spend an average of four hours running on-site for unloading and loading purposes, and an average of two hours off-site traveling to and from the Port of Oakland.

The locomotive emission estimates assume a monthly average of 500,000 ton-miles of locomotive deliveries. Assuming an average travel distance of 50 miles and an average loaded railcar weight of 65 tons, this would represent nearly two loaded, 20-railcar locomotive deliveries per week. 3845
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations Operational emission estimates for the proposed project are contained in Table 3.2-12 of the Draft EIR. For detailed assumptions used to estimate emissions, see Draft EIR, Appendix B.

The proposed project would result in operational-related criteria air pollutants or ozone precursors which would exceed the BAAQMD’s thresholds of significance, specifically with respect to ROG and NOX emissions (Draft EIR, Table 3.2-12). MM AIR-2c would be required to ensure the use of low-VOC architectural coatings for any reapplication of paints and coatings and the use of electric landscaping equipment, including chainsaws, lawnmowers, and leaf blowers during project operation. The trucking fleet would generate the majority of operational NOX emissions, thus MM AIR-2d would be required to ensure that a more fuel-efficient, lower-emission trucking fleet—one which demonstrates a model year 2014 or newer for all heavy-duty trucks upon first implementation—is utilized during project operation.

Under a dry storage scenario, implementation of MM AIR-2c would result in a reduction of ROG emissions during project operation from approximately 13 tons per year and 70 average pounds per day to approximately 12 tons per year and 64 average pounds per day, which would still exceed the BAAQMD significance thresholds for ROG emissions of 10 tons per year and 54 average pounds per day. Under a cold storage scenario, implementation of MM AIR-2c would result in a reduction of ROG emissions during project operation from approximately 16 tons per year and 90 average pounds per day to approximately 15 tons per year and 85 average pounds per day, which would still exceed the applicable BAAQMD significance thresholds (Draft EIR, Table 3.2-13).

Under a dry storage scenario, implementation of MM AIR-2d would result in a reduction of NOX emissions during project operation from approximately 40 tons per year and 217 average pounds per day to approximately 35 tons per year and 192 average pounds per day, which would still exceed the BAAQMD significance thresholds for NOX emissions of 10 tons per year and 54 average pounds per day. Under a cold storage scenario, implementation of MM AIR-2d would result in a reduction of NOX emissions during project operation from approximately 71 tons per year and 388 average pounds per day to approximately 66 tons per year and 362 average pounds per day, which would still exceed the applicable BAAQMD significance thresholds (Draft EIR, Table 3.2-13).

CalEEMod, Version 2020.4.0, utilizes a Statewide average VOC (i.e., ROG) per building square-foot metric, irrespective of land use type, derived from the ARB’s Statewide 2008 Consumer Product Inventory. Nonresidential land uses, such as the proposed project, are likely to result in fewer operational ROG emissions generated by the use of consumer products than what is demonstrated in this analysis. The principal source for operational ROG emissions would be the use of consumer products by employees and visitors and these uses would not be under the control of the property owner or tenant. As such, mitigation targeting the use of consumer products was omitted from this analysis.

Operational Carbon Monoxide Hotspot
The CO emissions from traffic generated by the proposed project are a concern at the local level.

The BAAQMD recommends a screening analysis to determine whether a project has the potential to contribute to a CO hotspot. The screening criteria identify when site-specific CO dispersion modeling 3846
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 98 is necessary. The proposed project would result in a less than significant impact to air quality for local CO if all the following screening criteria are met:

1. The project is consistent with an applicable congestion management program established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways, regional transportation plan, and local congestion management agency plans; and

2. The project traffic would not increase traffic volumes at affected intersections to more than 44,000 vehicles per hour; and

3. The project traffic would not increase traffic volumes at affected intersections to more than 24,000 vehicles per hour where vertical and/or horizontal mixing is substantially limited (e.g., tunnel, parking garage, bridge underpass, natural or urban street canyon, below-grade roadway).

The Traffic Impact Study (TIS) prepared for the proposed project concluded that no intersections impacted by the proposed project would experience traffic volumes of 44,000 vehicles per hour.

Nonetheless, accumulation of local CO concentration can occur when a transportation facility’s design or orientation prevents the adequate dispersion of CO emissions from vehicles. However, adjacent roadways that would receive new vehicle trips generated by the proposed project do not include roadway segments where vertical or horizontal atmospheric mixing is substantially limited.

As discussed in Section 3.12, Transportation of the Draft EIR, all studied roadway segments and intersections would operate at acceptable levels of service with traffic generated by the proposed project in combination with existing traffic levels. Because the proposed project would operate at acceptable levels of service consistent with the City of American Canyon standards, the proposed project would be consistent with an adopted congestion management program. Therefore, the proposed project would not exceed the CO screening criteria and would have a less than significant impact related to CO.

Consequently, implementation of MM AIR-2a and MM AIR-2b would sufficiently reduce project construction emissions to less than significant levels; however, implementation of MM AIR-2c and MM AIR-2d would not be sufficient to reduce project operation emissions to less than significant levels. The City finds that MM AIR-2a through MM AIR-2g are feasible, are adopted, and will reduce impacts to the greatest extent feasible. However, impacts related to project operation emissions would remain significant and unavoidable even with mitigation incorporated.

Cumulative Impacts
Because of emissions from existing nearby projects, the proposed project would have a significant cumulative impact on air quality. (Draft EIR, Page 4-4–5).

Findings: Significant cumulative impact (Draft EIR, Page 4-5). Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects as identified in the EIR. (State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15091(a)(1).) However, impacts would still remain significant and unavoidable even with mitigation incorporated. Specific economic, legal, social, 3847
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measure or project alternatives identified in the EIR. (State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15091(a)(3).)
Facts in Support of Findings
The geographic scope of the cumulative air quality analysis is the San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin, which covers all or portions of the counties of Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Sonoma, and Solano. The BAAQMD CEQA Guidelines’ cumulative significance criteria are used in the cumulative analysis of air quality.

A project would be judged to conflict with or obstruct implementation of the regional air quality plan if it would result in substantial new regional emissions not foreseen in the air quality planning process. Regional emissions forecasts in the air quality plan are based on population and employment forecasts based on City and County General Plans. The proposed project is consistent with land use designations and applicable goals and policies of the American Canyon General Plan, site zoning, and other applicable land use regulatory documents and thus is considered planned growth. Because the proposed project would not result in unplanned growth or in VMT, it would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the air quality plan in this regard. Additionally, the proposed project would meet all of the applicable Land Use Measures and Energy and Climate Measures contained in the BAAQMD’s Clean Air Plan.

If a project does not exceed the BAAQMD established numerical thresholds, its emissions would not be cumulatively considerable, resulting in less than significant air quality impacts to the region‘s existing air quality conditions. As discussed in Impact AIR-2, the proposed project would emit operational criteria pollutant emissions (ROGs and oxides of nitrogen) at levels that would exceed the BAAQMD CEQA Guidelines and significance thresholds. Proposed mitigation would not reduce these emissions to below BAAQMD thresholds. Therefore, the proposed project would contribute to a cumulatively considerable (i.e., significant and unavoidable) regional air quality impact with regard to criteria pollutants and consistency with the BAAQMD’s current Clean Air Plan.

1.7.2 - Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Energy
Cumulative Impacts
The proposed project’s cumulative impacts related to greenhouse gas emissions would be cumulatively significant. (Draft EIR, Page 4-9–10).

Findings: Significant cumulative impact (Draft EIR, Page 4-10). Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects as identified in the EIR. (State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15091(a)(1).) However, impacts would still remain significant and unavoidable even with mitigation incorporated. Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measure or project alternatives identified in the EIR. (State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15091(a)(3).)
3848
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 100
Facts in Support of Findings
The geographic scope of the cumulative GHG emissions analysis is the San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin, which covers all or portions of the counties of Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Sonoma, and Solano. In a larger sense, however, the relevant geographic area is the entire Earth, as explained by the California Supreme Court. “[B]ecause of the global scale of climate change, any one project’s contribution is unlikely to be significant by itself.” (Center for Biological Diversity v. Department of Fish and Wildlife (2015) 62 Cal.4th 204, 219.) “’With respect to climate change, an individual project's emissions would most likely not have any appreciable impact on the global problem by themselves, but they would contribute to the significant cumulative impact caused by GHG emissions from other sources around the globe. The question therefore becomes whether the proposed project’s incremental addition of GHG emissions is “cumulatively considerable” in light of the global problem, and thus significant.’” (Id., quoting Crockett, Addressing the Significance of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Under CEQA: California's Search for Regulatory Certainty in an Uncertain World (July 2011) Golden Gate U. Envtl. L.J. 203, 207–208).) The proposed project would emit new GHG emissions, as would other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable projects within the Air Basin. The BAAQMD has not set a numerical threshold of significance for GHG emissions from construction, but has set a threshold for GHG emissions from operation as well as a threshold on a per-service population basis. The proposed project would comply with relevant elements of the City of American Canyon EECAP, but would exceed both of the BAAQMD operational GHG thresholds and as such could be considered cumulatively significant. GHG emissions from the proposed project’s potential new stationary source were found to exceed the BAAQMD significance threshold for GHG from stationary sources and as such could be considered cumulatively significant. Therefore, the proposed project, in conjunction with other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future development in the Air Basin and around the world, would result in a significant cumulative GHG emissions impact.

1.8 - Findings Regarding Alternatives

1.8.1 - Introduction
This section presents findings regarding alternatives to the proposed project. The section provides a summary and discussion of the feasibility of the following alternatives evaluated in the Draft EIR:
• Alternative 1: No Project/No Development Alternative. The project site would remain undeveloped for the foreseeable future and no development would occur. • Alternative 2: No Project/Existing General Plan Alternative. A 2.4-million-square-foot food and beverage processing facility would be developed on the project site. • Alternative 3: Reduced Density Alternative. A 1.6-million-square-foot logistics center would be developed on the project site, which represents a 25 percent reduction in square footage relative to the proposed project. The layout and project boundaries would remain the same as the proposed project.
3849
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations • Alternative 4: Phase 1 Only Alternative. Phase 1 of the proposed project would be developed, which consists of approximately 1.1 million square feet of high-cube warehouse on 95 acres.

Phase 2 would not be developed, and the remaining 113 acres would remain undeveloped.

In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6, the EIR contained a comparative impact assessment of alternatives to the proposed project. The primary purpose of this analysis is to provide decision-makers and interested agencies, organizations and individuals with information about a reasonable range of potentially feasible project alternatives, which could avoid or reduce any of the proposed project’s significant adverse environmental effects. Important considerations for the alternatives analyses are noted below:
• An EIR need not consider every conceivable alternative to a project; • An EIR should identify alternatives that were considered by the lead agency, but rejected as infeasible during the scoping process;
• Reasons for rejecting an alternative include:
- Failure to meet most of the basic project objectives identified in Section 1.3.2, Project Objectives;
- Infeasibility; and
- Inability to avoid significant environmental effects.

With respect to project alternatives, “[t]he issue of feasibility arises at two different junctures: (1) in the assessment of alternatives in the EIR and (2) during the agency’s later consideration of whether to approve the project.” (California Native Plant Society v. City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Cal. App. 4th 957, 981 (CNPS), citing Mira Mar Mobile Community v. City of Oceanside (2004) 119 Cal.App.4th 477, 489 (Mira Mar).) “But ‘differing factors come into play at each stage.’” (CNPS, supra, 177 Cal.App.4th at p. 981, citing Kostka & Zischke, Practice Under the Cal. Environmental Quality Act [Cont.Ed.Bar 2d ed. 2009] (Kostka) § 15.9, p. 740.) “For the first phase—inclusion in the EIR—the standard is whether the alternative is potentially feasible.” (CNPS, supra, 177 Cal.App.4th at p. 981, citing Mira Mar, supra, 119 Cal.App.4th at p. 489; CEQA Guidelines, § 15126.6, subd. (a).) “By contrast, at the second phase—the final decision on project approval—the decision-making body evaluates whether the alternatives are actually feasible.” (CNPS, supra, 177 Cal.App.4th at p. 981, citing CEQA Guidelines, § 15091, subd. (a)(3).) “At that juncture, the decisionmakers may reject as infeasible alternatives that were identified in the EIR as potentially feasible.” (CNPS, supra, 177 Cal.App.4th at p. 981, citing Mira Mar, supra, 119 Cal.App.4th at p. 489.) “While it is up to the EIR preparer to identify alternatives as potentially feasible, the decisionmaking body ‘may or may not reject those alternatives as being infeasible’ when it comes to project approval.” (CNPS, supra, 177 Cal.App.4th at p. 999, quoting Sierra Club v. County of Napa, supra, 121 Cal.App.4th at p. 1504.) “Rejection by the decision makers does not undermine the validity of the EIR's alternatives analysis.” (CNPS, supra, 177 Cal.App.4th at p. 999, citing Mira Mar, supra, 119 Cal.App.4th at p. 489.) “Like mitigation measures, potentially feasible alternatives ‘are suggestions which may or may not be adopted by the decisionmakers.’” (CNPS, supra, 177 Cal.App.4th at p. 999, quoting No Slo Transit, Inc. v. City of Long Beach (1987) 197 Cal.App.3d 241, 256.) 3850
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 102
“When it comes time to decide on project approval, the public agency’s decision-making body evaluates whether the alternatives are actually feasible.” (CNPS, supra, 177 Cal.App.4th at p. 999, citing Mira Mar, supra, 119 Cal.App.4th at p. 489, and CEQA Guidelines, § 15091, subd. (a)(3).) “While staff may draft the necessary findings, the decision-making body is responsible for the ultimate determination of feasibility, which cannot be delegated.” (CNPS, supra, 177 Cal.App.4th at p. 999, citing CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15025, subd. (b)(2), § 15091, subd. (a)(3).) “At this final stage of project approval, the agency considers whether “[s]pecific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations ... make infeasible the mitigation measures or alternatives identified in the environmental impact report.” (CNPS, supra, 177 Cal.App.4th at p. 1000, citing Pub. Resources Code, § 21081, subd. (a)(3).) “Broader considerations of policy thus come into play when the decision-making body is considering actual feasibility than when the EIR preparer is assessing potential feasibility of the alternatives.” (CNPS, supra, 177 Cal.App.4th at p. 1000.) Thus, “it does not subvert the CEQA environmental review process for the ultimate decision maker to reject as infeasible alternatives identified in the EIR.” (Ibid.) At the decision-making stage, “‘feasibility' under CEQA encompasses 'desirability' to the extent that desirability is based on a reasonable balancing of the relevant economic, environmental, social, and technological factors." (City of Del Mar v. City of San Diego (1982) 133 Cal.App.3d 410, 417; CNPS, supra, 177 Cal.App.4th at p. 1001; San Diego Citizenry Group v. County of San Diego (2013) 219 Cal.App.4th 1, 17.)
The concept of “feasibility” also encompasses the question of whether a particular alternative promotes the underlying goals and objectives of a project. (Sierra Club v. County of Napa (2004) 121 Cal.App.4th 1490, 1506-1509 [upholding CEQA findings rejecting alternatives in reliance on applicant’s project objectives]; see also CNPS, supra, 177 Cal.App.4th at p. 1001 [“an alternative ‘may be found infeasible on the ground it is inconsistent with the project objectives as long as the finding is supported by substantial evidence in the record’”], quoting Kostka, § 17.30, p. 825); Citizens for Open Government v. City of Lodi (2012) 205 Cal.App.4th 296, 314-315 (Citizens for Open Government) [court upholds agency’s project approval where a rejected alternative would not “entirely fulfill” a particular project objective and “would be ‘substantially less effective’ in meeting” the lead agency’s “goals”]; In re Bay-Delta Programmatic Environmental Impact Report Coordinated Proceedings(2008) 43 Cal.4th 1143, 1165, 1166 (Bay-Delta) [“a lead agency may structure its EIR alternative analysis around a reasonable definition of underlying purpose and need not study alternatives that cannot achieve that basic goal”]; and Sequoyah Hills Homeowners Assn. v. City of Oakland (1993) 23 Cal.App.4th 704, 715 [court upholds finding rejecting lower density housing alternative as infeasible, citing city council’s conclusion that the fact that “‘the houses would be necessarily more expensive than those of the proposed project’ and would defeat the project objective of providing the ‘the least expensive single-family housing for the vicinity’”].)
CEQA does not require that an analysis of alternate sites always be included in an EIR. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(f)(2), in making the decision to include or exclude analysis of an alternate site, the “key question and first step in analysis is whether any of the significant effects of 3851
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations the project would be avoided or substantially lessened by putting the project in another location.

Only locations that would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the project need to be considered for inclusion in the EIR.”
The Draft EIR evaluates the feasibility of three alternative locations located within 1 mile of the project site either in the City of American Canyon or within unincorporated Napa County (Draft EIR, Exhibit 5-1). The three alternative locations considered in the Draft EIR are Sentinels of Freedom Property, Commerce Court, and Hess Vineyards. All three alternative locations do not constitute feasible alternatives because none of the properties are owned, controlled, or otherwise accessible to the project applicant and each of the properties are too small to accommodate the level of development contemplated by the proposed project. Furthermore, the Commerce Court location is the subject of an active development application and the Hess Vineyards location was re-designated from “Industrial” to “Agriculture, Watershed, and Open Space” by the Napa County Zoning Ordinance in 2008. None of these three sites would meet CEQA Guidelines criteria for a feasible alternative location (Draft EIR, Table 5-8).

Alternative 1: No Project/No Development Alternative.

CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(e) requires that an EIR evaluate a “No Project Alternative,” which is intended to allow decision-makers to compare the impacts of approving the proposed project with the impacts of not approving the proposed project. In cases where the project constitutes a land development project, the No Project Alternative is the “circumstance under which the project does not proceed.” For many projects, the No Project Alternative represents a “No Development” scenario, in which the project site remains in its existing condition and no development occurs for the foreseeable future. However, CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(e)(3)(B) establishes that “If disapproval of the project under consideration would result in predictable actions by others such as the proposal of some other project, this ‘no project’ consequence should be discussed.” In the interests of informed decision-making, the EIR considered both a No Project/No Development Alternative and a No Project/Existing General Plan Alternative.

The No Project/No Development Alternative would avoid the proposed project’s significant and unavoidable impacts and would avoid any potential impacts related to all environmental topical areas. However, this alternative would not advance any of the project objectives, including those related to facilitating the development of land planned for business park/industrial uses to its highest and best use; positively contributing to the local economy; providing the City of American Canyon with a high-quality, employment-generating industrial development; and serving local and regional demand for manufacturing, logistics warehouse, and other industrial uses. Finally, it should be noted that the project site is zoned for industrial use, has been the subject of previous industrial development proposals, and is currently served with infrastructure suitable for this type of development. Thus, should the proposed project not advance, it would be expected that another industrial development proposal would be submitted.

Finding: Based on the discussion in the EIR and all other evidence before it, the City finds that the No Project/No Development Alternative does not advance any of the project objectives and would therefore represent an undesirable policy outcome. 3852
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 104
The City Council therefore rejects the No Project/No Development Alternative as infeasible.

Alternative 2: No Project/Existing General Plan Alternative.

Under the No Project/Existing General Plan Alternative, a 2.4-million- square- foot food and beverage processing facility would be developed on the project site. This alternative would not avoid the significant and unavoidable air quality and GHG emissions impacts associated with the proposed project and in fact would increase the severity of these impacts. The No Project/Existing General Plan Alternative would increase the severity of impacts associated with land use, noise, public services, transportation, and utilities. Additionally, the No Project/Existing General Plan Alternative would have similar impacts on aesthetics, biological resources, cultural resources, geology, hazards, and hydrology and water quality.
• The No Project/Existing General Plan Alternative, in theory, would advance most of the project objectives, including those related to facilitating the development of land planned for business park/industrial uses to its highest and best use; positively contributing to the local economy; providing the City of American Canyon with a high-quality, employment-generating industrial development. The change of the end use, however, would not advance as well as the proposed project the objectives of promoting economic growth in American Canyon by attracting new industries; promoting development that generates net positive tax revenues for the City by generating more in new tax revenues than are consumed by City expenditures on services provided to the development; and creating new employment opportunities for residents of Napa County and the surrounding region. The City is unaware of any proposal to develop a new beverage processing facility in the project area, making the economic benefits of such a use more hypothetical than real at present.

Finding: Based on the discussion in the EIR and all other evidence before it, the City Council finds that the No Project/Existing General Plan Alternative does not advance all of the project objectives, or does not advance them as well as the proposed project would, and thus would represent a less desirable policy outcome as compared with the proposed project, which would fully meet the project objectives and is an active development proposal would bring the City of American Canyon all of the benefits set forth in the Statement of Overriding Considerations. Because of the strong market for logistics and warehousing uses, which reflects consumers’ growing preferences for home deliveries of items formerly purchased at so-called brick and mortar retail facilities, the City Council sees the proposed project as an opportunity to allow an entrepreneur to serve the City’s residents and the residents of the larger region in a manner that is beneficial to both the entrepreneur and the residents, as well as to the City itself. The City Council sees no reason to impose on the applicant a development configuration or land use substantially at odds with what the applicant has proposed, particularly when such a configuration or use would produce greater levels of some environmental impacts. A local agency decisionmaking body “may approve a developer’s choice of a project once its significant adverse environmental effects have been reduced to an acceptable level that is, all avoidable significant damage to the environment has been eliminated and that 3853
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations which remains is otherwise acceptable.” (Laurel Hills Homeowners Assn. v. City Council (1978) 83 Cal.App.3d 515, 521 (Laurel Hills); see also Citizens for Open Government, supra, 205 Cal.App.4th at pp. 314-315 [court upholds agency’s project approval where a rejected alternative would not “entirely fulfill” a particular project objective and “would be ‘substantially less effective’ in meeting” the agency’s “goals”].) For all of these reasons, and each of them, the City Council rejects Alternative 2 as infeasible.

Alternative 3: Reduced Density Alternative.

Under the Reduced Density Alternative, a 1.6-million- square- foot logistics center would be developed on the project site, which represents a 25 percent reduction in square footage relative to the proposed project. The layout and project boundaries would remain the same as the proposed project. The alternative would lessen the severity of, but would not avoid, the significant and unavoidable air quality and GHG emissions impacts associated with the proposed project.

Additionally, the Reduced Density Alternative would lessen the severity of several of the significant impacts that can be reduced to a level of less than significant with mitigation (e.g., hydrology and water quality, and noise).

Although the Reduced Density Alternative would advance all of the project objectives, several of them would be advanced to a lesser degree, resulting in fewer positive economic benefits. For example, this alternative would be expected to employ fewer workers than the proposed project and would generate less tax revenue for the City. More specifically, this alternative would be less effective than the proposed project in meeting objectives related to promoting economic growth in American Canyon by attracting new industries; promoting development that generates net positive tax revenues for the City by generating more in new tax revenues than are consumed by City expenditures on services provided to the development; creating new employment opportunities for residents of Napa County and the surrounding region; and facilitating the development of land planned for business park/industrial uses to its highest and best use.

Finding: Based on the discussion in the EIR and all other evidence before it, the City Council finds that the Reduced Density Alternative advances several project objectives to a lesser degree than the proposed project and would therefore represent a less desirable policy outcome as compared with the proposed project, which would fully meet the project objectives and would bring the City of American Canyon all of the benefits set forth in the Statement of Overriding Considerations. The primary difference between the alternative and the proposed project is that the alternative is 25 percent smaller. The City Council sees no compelling need to impose such a size reduction on the applicant in light of the economic challenges associated with developing land (i.e., “making it pencil”). As a representative of the applicant has said, “Buzz Oates LLC will establish an entitled logistics center serving significant unmet demand for new warehousing and logistics space”; “[t]he market for logistics facilities is a highly competitive market and we must balance costs with the ability to attract tenants”; and “[w]e do not believe … that we can take on any additional costs without undermining the prudence of the huge investments that are we making.” 3854
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 106
(Letter from Joe Livaich, Buzz Oates LLC, to Brent Cooper, City of American Canyon (Dec. 2, 2022 [Appendix N to Final EIR, vol. 2].)
The City Council is inclined to defer to the applicant with regard to the optimal size of the project, given the economic realities the applicant is facing and the fact that environmental impacts of the alternative would not be substantially less than those of the project. A local agency decision-making body “may approve a developer’s choice of a project once its significant adverse environmental effects have been reduced to an acceptable level that is, all avoidable significant damage to the environment has been eliminated and that which remains is otherwise acceptable.” (Laurel Hills, supra, 83 Cal.App.3d at p. 521; see also Citizens for Open Government, supra, 205 Cal.App.4th at pp. 314-315 [court upholds agency’s project approval where a rejected alternative would not “entirely fulfill” a particular project objective and “would be ‘substantially less effective’ in meeting” the agency’s “goals”].) For all of these reasons, and each of them, the City Council rejects Alternative 3 as infeasible.

Alternative 4: Phase 1 Only Alternative.

Under the Phase 1 Only Alternative, only Phase 1 of the proposed project would be developed, which consists of approximately 1.1 million square feet of high-cube warehouse on 95 acres. Phase 2 would not be developed, and the remaining 113 acres would remain undeveloped. This alternative would lessen the severity of, but would not avoid, the significant and unavoidable air quality and GHG emissions impacts associated with the proposed project. Additionally, the Phase 1 Only Alternative would lessen the severity of several of the significant impacts that can be reduced to a level of less than significant with mitigation (e.g., biological resources, cultural resources, hydrology and water quality, and noise).

The Phase 1 Only Alternative would advance all of the project objectives, but several of them would be advanced to a lesser degree, resulting in fewer positive economic benefits and employing fewer workers than the proposed project. More specifically, this alternative would be less effective than the proposed project in meeting objectives related to promoting economic growth in American Canyon by attracting new industries; promoting development that generates net positive tax revenues for the City by generating more in new tax revenues than are consumed by City expenditures on services provided to the development; creating new employment opportunities for residents of Napa County and the surrounding region; and facilitating the development of land planned for business park/industrial uses to its highest and best use.

As a practical matter, the project applicant has a 100-year lease agreement with the property owner, and it would be impractical to forego development on the Phase 2 portion of the project site.

Moreover, the project site is the single largest undeveloped site in the City of American Canyon and is zoned for industrial use. Preserving 113 acres of the site as a wetland preserve would not represent the highest and best use of the property, particularly since approximately 44.8 acres of the project site would be assigned for this use.
3855
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations Finding: Based on the discussion in the EIR and all other evidence before it, the City Council finds that the Phase I Only Alternative advances several project objectives to a lesser degree than the proposed project and would therefore represent a less desirable policy outcome as compared with the proposed project, which would fully meet the project objectives and would bring the City of American Canyon all of the benefits set forth in the Statement of Overriding Considerations. The primary difference between the alternative and the proposed project is the amount and size of the development that would occur. The applicant would be prohibited from building a second phase, notwithstanding the general plan and zoning designations of the site, which favor development. The City Council sees no compelling need to impose such a size reduction on the applicant in light of the clear economic benefits of the second phase and the fact that the applicant, consistent with the planned uses for the property, has invested in the project in the hope of developing both phases, at a pace dictated by market conditions. The City Council concludes that the second phase is important to the applicant from an economic standpoint. (See, e.g., Letter from Joe Livaich, Buzz Oates LLC, to Brent Cooper, City of American Canyon (Dec. 2, 2022 [Appendix N to Final EIR, vol. 2].) The second phase would also generate tax revenues for the City, employ local residents, and serve local and regional demand for logistics and warehousing uses.

The City Council is inclined to defer to the applicant with regard to the optimal size of the project, given the economic realities the applicant is facing. A local agency decision-making body “may approve a developer’s choice of a project once its significant adverse environmental effects have been reduced to an acceptable level that is, all avoidable significant damage to the environment has been eliminated and that which remains is otherwise acceptable.” (Laurel Hills, supra, 83 Cal.App.3d at p. 521; see also Citizens for Open Government, supra, 205 Cal.App.4th at pp. 314-315 [court upholds agency’s project approval where a rejected alternative would not “entirely fulfill” a particular project objective and “would be ‘substantially less effective’ in meeting” the agency’s “goals”].) For all of these reasons, and each of them, the City Council rejects Alternative 4 as infeasible.

Environmentally Superior Alternative
Section 15126.6(e)(2) of the State CEQA Guidelines indicates that an analysis of alternatives to a proposed project shall identify an environmentally superior alternative among the alternatives evaluated in an EIR.

Three of the project alternatives would lessen the environmental impacts relative to the proposed project to a certain degree (as described above and further in the Draft EIR). The No Project/Existing General Plan Alternative would result in greater environmental impacts in some environmental topic areas. If the No Project/No Development Alternative is the environmentally superior alternative— which is the case here as it avoids all project impacts, but fails to satisfy any of the project objectives—the EIR must also identify another environmentally superior alternative among the remaining alternatives. Based on these Findings, of the three remaining alternatives, the Phase I 3856
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 108
Only Alternative would be considered the environmentally superior alternative, even though it fails to fully implement project objectives and is therefore infeasible.

1.9 - Findings Regarding Cumulative Impacts
Consistent with CEQA’s requirements, the EIR for the proposed project includes an analysis of cumulative impacts in every topical discussion. As discussed above, except as to cumulative air quality impacts, all other cumulative impacts associated with the proposed project are less than significant with the implementation of applicable mitigation and compliance with applicable regulations. Cumulative air quality impacts remain significant even with incorporation of all feasible mitigation.

1.10 - Findings Regarding Growth Inducement
State CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.2(e) requires a discussion of the ways in which a proposed project could foster economic or population growth, or the construction of additional housing, either directly or indirectly, in the surrounding environment. Typical growth-inducing factors might be the extension of urban services or transportation infrastructure to a previously unserved or underserved area, or the removal of major barriers to development.

There are two types of growth-inducing impacts that a project may have: direct and indirect. To assess the potential for growth-inducing impacts, the project’s characteristics that may encourage and facilitate activities that individually or cumulatively may affect the environment must be evaluated (CEQA Guidelines § 15126.2(e)). CEQA Guidelines, as interpreted by the City, state that a significant growth-inducing impact may result if the project would:
• Induce substantial population growth in an area (for example, by proposing new homes and commercial or industrial businesses beyond the land use density/intensity envisioned in the general plan);
• Substantially alter the planned location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the population of an area; or
• Include extensions of roads or other infrastructure not assumed in the general plan or adopted capital improvements project list when such infrastructure exceeds the needs of the project and could accommodate future developments.

Direct growth-inducing impacts occur when the development of a project imposes new burdens on a community by directly inducing unplanned population growth, or by leading to the construction of additional developments in the same area. Also included in this category are projects that remove physical obstacles to population growth (such as a new road into an undeveloped area or a WWTP with excess capacity that could allow additional development in the service area). Construction of these types of infrastructure projects cannot be considered isolated from the development they facilitate and serve. Projects that physically remove obstacles to growth, or projects that indirectly induce growth may provide a catalyst for future unrelated development in an area such as a new residential community that requires additional commercial uses to support residents. 3857
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations The proposed project does not include residential uses and therefore would not directly induce population growth.

The proposed project would develop approximately 2.4 million square feet of new high-cube warehouse uses and would employ an estimated 1,200 workers during construction and 3,643 workers when fully operational at buildout. The proposed project’s warehouses would likely be built incrementally over a period of years and, thus, jobs would be added in phases as the project builds out. As such, there would not be an “overnight” influx of new employment opportunities.

The California Employment Development Department estimated the combined Napa-Solano labor force at 273,500 in October 2021, which is sufficiently large enough to fill the proposed project’s estimated employment opportunities such that unplanned growth would not occur.

During the NOP review period, the County of Napa requested the Draft EIR evaluate whether there is sufficient housing for project employees. Because prospective employees have not been identified, statements about housing for project employees would be speculative. Nonetheless, the City of American Canyon has more than 2,400 dwelling units in the pipeline (Draft EIR, Table 4-1). The City’s population was estimated to be 20,837. Thus, the addition of more than 2,400 dwelling units to the City’s housing inventory would more than offset the employment growth attributable to the proposed project.

The proposed project would be served by connections to existing water, wastewater, storm drainage, electricity, and natural gas lines that exist in Green Island Road or Devlin Road. No extension of infrastructure into unserved areas would be required and, therefore, no removal of physical barriers to growth would occur. As such, the proposed project would not indirectly induce substantial population growth (Draft EIR, Pages 6-1—2).

1.11 - Findings Regarding Significant Irreversible Environmental Changes According to Sections 15126(c) and 15126.2(d) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the Lead Agency must address any significant irreversible environmental changes that would occur should the project be implemented. Generally, a project would result in significant irreversible environmental changes if any of the following would occur:
• The project would involve a large commitment of nonrenewable resources; • The primary and secondary impacts of the project would generally commit future generations to similar uses;
• The project involves uses in which irreversible damage could result from any potential environmental accidents; or
• The proposed consumption of resources is not justified.

Construction of the proposed project would include the consumption of resources that are not replenishable, or which may renew so slowly to be considered nonrenewable. These resources would include the following: certain types of lumber and other forest products; aggregate materials used in concrete and asphalt such as sand, gravel, and stone; metals such as steel, copper, and lead; 3858
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 110
petrochemical construction materials such as plastics; and water. Fossil fuels such as gasoline and oil would also be consumed in the use of construction vehicles and equipment. Development would not be expected to involve an unusual commitment of nonrenewable resources, nor be expected to consume any resources in a wasteful manner. Construction-related impacts related to electricity and fuel consumption would be less than significant.

The irreversible long-term environmental changes associated with the proposed project would include an increase in local and regional vehicular traffic, and the resultant increase in air pollutants, GHG emissions, and noise generated by this traffic. The proposed project would also irreversibly increase the commitment of energy resources, potable water supply, wastewater treatment, solid waste disposal, and public services, such as providing police and fire services, to support the proposed project through its lifetime. However, features incorporated into the proposed project and proposed mitigation measures would minimize the significant effects of the environmental changes associated with the proposed project to the maximum degree feasible.

As explained in the Draft EIR, the proposed project will not result in the wasteful, inefficient, and unnecessary consumption of energy, will not cause the need for additional natural gas or electrical energy-producing facilities, and, therefore, will not create a significant impact on energy resources.

Rather, the proposed project would be well-positioned to serve the North Bay Counties of Napa, Solano, and Sonoma due to its proximity to SR-29/SR-12 corridors.

1.12 - Findings Regarding Recirculation
During the public review period after the Draft EIR was published, the City received certain additional information. Lead Agency staff and consultants involved in preparing the various studies, reports and analyses included in the Draft EIR have also presented additional information since the publication of the Draft EIR. Some of this information was contained in comments submitted on the Draft EIR, and in responses to those comments contained in the Final EIR. Other information was presented at or before public meetings/hearings on the EIR. The EIR incorporates feasible mitigation, additions, clarifications, modifications, and other changes, in response to comments and as determined appropriate by Lead Agency staff and required under CEQA.

Under Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n v. Regents of Univ. of Cal. (1993) 6 C4th 1112 (Laurel Heights II) and the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal Code Regs §15088.5(a)(3)), when information added to the Final EIR consists of a suggested additional mitigation measure, recirculation is required only if the new mitigation measure meets all of the following criteria (South County Citizens for Smart Growth v. County of Nevada (2013) 221 Cal.App.4th 316, 330):
• It is feasible;
• It is considerably different from the alternatives or mitigation measures already evaluated in the Draft EIR;
• It would clearly lessen the project's significant environmental impacts; and • It is not adopted.
3859
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations Recirculation is only required only if each of the above tests is met. (South County Citizens, supra at 330). As described in detail in Table 31 of Volume 1 of the Final EIR, mitigation measures proposed during the public comment period are either (1) not necessary; (2) not feasible; (3) or are already included as mitigation. (See also Final EIR, vol. 2, Responses to Comments AB.NOV. 17-10 and CBD8.) MM AIR-2e and MM AIR-2f have been adopted to further reduce air quality impacts as noted in Final EIR, Vol. 1, Section 5, Errata. Neither additional mitigation measure has any significant effects.

However, the residual significance of Impact AIR-1 and AIR-2 remains significant and unavoidable even with the implementation of the additional mitigation.

Nor does the new information in Volume 2 of the Final EIR necessitate recirculation, as some commenters have suggested. In particular, as explained in Master Response B, information regarding the construction of a gravel road on the project site above a sewer alignment serving the Napa Logistics Park Phase 2 project did not disclose any previously undisclosed significant environmental effects or any substantial increases in the severity of previously disclosed environmental impacts.

Rather, the sewer lines and the gravel road were the subject or prior CEQA analysis for a different project and were constructed only after receipt of all required permits and other regulatory approvals. The wetlands mitigation for the proposed project remains viable notwithstanding the existence of the gravel road, which will be temporary in character, in any event.

The City Council has considered all relevant information including the opinions and comments of interested agencies, organizations and individuals. The Lead Agency finds that the additional mitigation does not meet the test for recirculation. Additionally, the City finds that none of the additional information provided during the public comment period demonstrates any of the following situations requiring recirculation identified in CEQA Guideline 15088.5 have occurred:
• A new significant environmental impact that would result from the project (or any alternative) or from a new mitigation measure proposed to be implemented. • A substantial increase in the severity of an environmental impact would result unless mitigation measures are adopted that reduce the impact to a level of insignificance. • A feasible project alternative or mitigation measure considerably different from others previously analyzed would clearly lessen the significant environmental impacts of the project (or an alternative), but the project's proponents decline to adopt it. • The Draft EIR was so fundamentally and basically inadequate and conclusory in nature that meaningful public review and comment were precluded.

Based on the foregoing and as explained in more detail in the Final EIR, and having reviewed all the information in the record of proceedings, the City Council of American Canyon hereby finds that this additional information does not constitute significant new information nor does it require recirculation of the EIR. The additional information merely clarifies or amplifies an adequate EIR.

1.13 - Statement of Overriding Considerations
CEQA requires that a Lead Agency’s decision-making body balance the benefits of a project against its unavoidable environmental risk in determining whether to approve the project. If the decisionmaking body determines that the benefits outweigh the unavoidable adverse effects, those effects 3860
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 112
may be considered “acceptable” pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15093(a). CEQA requires that the decision-making body support, in writing, the specific reasons for considering a project acceptable when significant impacts are infeasible to mitigate. Those reasons must be based on substantial evidence in the EIR or elsewhere in the administrative record pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15093(b). The decision-making body’s written reasons are referred to as a Statement of Overriding Considerations.

As explained in the above Findings of Fact, most of the project’s impacts on the environment would either be insignificant or, through the incorporation of mitigation measures as conditions of approval of the project, can be reduced to less than significant. As set forth in Section 1.7 above, however, even with implementation of all available mitigation, the proposed project would result in significant unavoidable impacts related to project level inconsistencies with the BAAQMD regional air quality plan and cumulative criteria pollutant emissions. Further, as set forth in Section 1.8 above, there are no feasible alternatives to the project, which would mitigate or avoid those environmental impacts and which would meet project objectives. Accordingly, as set forth below, the City of American Canyon declares that pursuant to the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15093, the City of American Canyon has balanced the benefits of the proposed project against any unavoidable environmental impacts in determining whether to approve the proposed project. Pursuant to the State CEQA Guidelines, if the benefits of the proposed project outweigh the proposed project’s unavoidable adverse environmental impacts, those impacts may be considered “acceptable.” Having reduced the adverse significant environmental effect of the proposed project to the extent feasible by adopting the mitigation measures contained in the EIR, the MMRP, and these Findings, having considered the entire administrative record on the proposed project, and having weighed the benefits of the proposed project against its unavoidable adverse impact after mitigation, the City of American Canyon has determined that each of the following social, economic and environmental benefits of the proposed project separately and individually outweigh all the potential unavoidable adverse impacts and render those potential adverse environmental impacts acceptable based upon the following overriding considerations:
• The project applicant would construct the Napa Valley Vine Trail segment along the project frontage with Devlin Road.
• The proposed project would provide and preserve in perpetuity approximately 45 acres of wetlands that would include habitat currently suitable for foraging by the Swainson’s hawk.

This permanent preservation respects the natural environment and provides both open space and aesthetic relief from developed urban areas.
• The proposed project would contribute to the City’s economic base and is estimated to create 3,643 new local employment opportunities that would Improve American Canyon’s jobshousing ratio. The development of up to 3,643 new jobs in a housing-rich part of the Bay Area region would allow employees to work closer to where they live, thereby reducing vehicle miles traveled.
• The proposed project would stimulate capital investment and expand the tax base. 3861
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations • The proposed project would meet demand for, bring new businesses to the City and develop compatible land uses near the Napa County Airport. By developing the proposed project’s 2.4 million square feet of high-cube warehouse near the airport and transportation corridors, it would contribute to reducing trip length by locating these facilities closer to customers within this region.
• The proposed project would advance the City’s goal of orderly development that maintains American Canyon’s distinctive character. The proposed project would promote the development of industries that capitalize on the geographic advantages of the City while ensuring consistency with the patterns and distribution of use and density depicted on the Land Use Plan Map (Figure 1-1 of the General Plan).
• The proposed project would help maintain consistency with and carry out the goals, objectives, and policies of the City of American Canyon General Plan. The stated goals, objectives, and policies set forth in the City's Land Use and Planning element recognize the need to accommodate new development by providing a full mix of uses to support its population. Providing new commercial opportunities would help implement several General Plan goals as illustrated in Table 3.9-2 of the Draft EIR.

The substantial evidence supporting the enumerated benefits of the Project can be found in the preceding findings, in the Project itself, in the record of proceedings as defined below, in the City's General Plan, and in pertinent sections of the City’s Zoning Ordinance. Each of the overriding considerations set forth above constitutes a separate and independent ground for finding that the benefits of the proposed project outweigh its significant adverse environmental effects and is an overriding consideration warranting approval. Thus, if a court were to find that any particular benefit is not supported by substantial evidence, the City Council would rely on whatever benefit(s) that the court did find were supported by substantial evidence.

Custodian of Record; Scope and Content of Record
The documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which these Findings have been based are located at the Community Development Department at 4381 Broadway Street, Suite 201, American Canyon, CA 94503. This information is provided in compliance with Public Resources Code Section 21081.6.

Various documents, information, testimony, reports, studies, analyses and other materials (both oral and written) constitute the record upon which the City bases these Findings and are the basis for the City’s approval and/or adoption contained herein. These Findings cite specific pieces of evidence, but none of the City's findings are based solely on those cited pieces of evidence. Rather, these Findings are based upon the entire record, and the Lead Agency intends to rely upon all supporting evidence in the record for each of its conclusions contained herein.

The documents in the record include all items referenced in Public Resources Code Section 21167.6(e):
(i) All project application materials;
3862
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 114
(ii) The project EIR (including the Draft EIR, the Final EIR, and all appendices attached thereto); (iii) All staff reports and related documents prepared by the lead agency and/or consultants with respect to the lead agency’s compliance with the substantive and procedural requirements of this division and with respect to the action on the project; (iv) All staff reports and related documents prepared by the lead agency and written testimony or documents submitted by any person relevant to any findings or Statement of Overriding Considerations adopted by the lead agency pursuant to this division; (v) All documentary and oral evidence received and reviewed at public hearings, public meetings, study sessions, and workshops on the Project EIR, and any transcript or minutes of the proceedings at which any advisory body or decision-making body heard testimony on, or considered the Project EIR;
(vi) All notices issued by the lead agency to comply with this division or with any other law governing the processing and approval of the project;
(vii) All written comments received in response to, or in connection with, the Project EIR, including comments on the Draft EIR;
(viii) All written evidence or correspondence submitted to, or transferred from, the lead agency with respect to compliance with this division or with respect to the project; (ix) Any proposed decisions or findings submitted to the decision-makers by lead agency staff, or the project proponent, project opponents, or other interested agencies, organizations and/or individuals;
(x) The documentation of the final decision, including the Project EIR and all documents, in addition to those referenced in paragraph (c), cited or relied on in the findings or in a Statement of Overriding Considerations adopted pursuant to this division; (xi) For documentary and informational purposes, all locally-adopted land use plans and ordinances, including, without limitation, general plans, specific plans and ordinances, master plans together with environmental review documents, findings, mitigation monitoring programs, and other documentation relevant to planned growth in the area; (xii) Any other written materials relevant to the lead agency’s compliance with this division or to its decision on the merits of the project, including any drafts of any environmental document or portions thereof, which have been released for public review, and copies of studies or other documents relied upon in any environmental document prepared for the project and either made available to the public during the public review period or included in the lead agency's files on the project, and all internal agency communications, including staff notes and memoranda related to the project or to compliance with this division; (xiii) The full written record before any inferior administrative decision-making body whose decision was appealed to a superior administrative decision-making body prior to the filing of litigation; and
(xiv) Any additional items not included above if otherwise required by law. 3863
City of American Canyon—Giovannoni Logistics Center Project CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations FirstCarbon Solutions
Appendix A:

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
3864
NORTH AMERICA | EUROPE | AFRICA | AUSTRALIA | ASIA
WWW.FIRSTCARBONSOLUTIONS.COM
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
for the
Giovannoni Logistics Center Project
Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of American Canyon, Napa County, California
Prepared for:

City of American Canyon
4381 Broadway Street, Suite 201
American Canyon, CA 94503
707.647.5345
Contact: Brent Cooper, AICP, Community Development Director Prepared by:

FirstCarbon Solutions
2999 Oak Road, Suite 250
Walnut Creek, CA 94597
925.357.2562
Contact: Mary Bean, Project Director
Grant Gruber, Project Manager
Report Date: January 27, 2022
ATTACHMENT 1. Exhibit E Giovannoni MMRP
3865

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
3866
City of American Canyon–Giovannoni Logistics Center Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Preface
FirstCarbon Solutions 1 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/5460/54600001/MMRP/54600001 Giovannoni Logistics Center Project MMRP.docx

PREFACE
Section 21081.6 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15097 require a Lead Agency to adopt a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) whenever it adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) in conjunction with a project approval.

The purpose of the MMRP is to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures occurs during project implementation.

The Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) prepared for the Giovannoni Logistics Center Project concluded that project implementation could result in potentially significant effects on the environment and mitigation measures were incorporated into the proposed project or are required as a condition of project approval that reduce these potential impacts to a less than significant level. This MMRP documents how and when the mitigation measures adopted by the lead agency will be implemented and confirms that potential environmental impacts are reduced to less than significant levels as identified in the MND.

This document does not discuss those subjects that the environmental analysis demonstrates would result in less than significant impacts and for which no mitigation was proposed or necessary. 3867

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
3868
City of American Canyon
Giovannoni Logistics Center Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 3 https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/5460/54600001/MMRP/54600001 Giovannoni Logistics Center Project MMRP.docx Table 1: Giovannoni Logistics Center Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial

3.1 Aesthetics, Light, and Glare
MM AES-3: Prior to issuance of building permits for the proposed project, the project applicant shall prepare and submit a photometric plan to the City of American Canyon for review and approval which demonstrates that all exterior light fixtures would be directed downward or employ full cut-off fixtures to minimize light spillage and avoid interference with aviation operations at the Napa County Airport. The approved plan shall be incorporated into the proposed project.

Approval of plan Prior to issuance of
building permits for
the proposed project
City of American
Canyon

3.2 Air Quality
MM AIR-2a: The following Best Management Practices (BMPs), as recommended by the Bay Area Air Quality Management
District (BAAQMD), shall be included in the design of the project and implemented during construction:
• All active construction areas shall be watered at least two times per day.
• All exposed non-paved surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and access roads) shall be watered at least three times per day and/or non-toxic soil stabilizers shall be applied to exposed non-paved surfaces. • All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off-site shall be covered and/or shall maintain at least 2 feet of freeboard.
• All visible mud or dirt tracked out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street
sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power
sweeping is prohibited.
• All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 miles per hour.

Notes on construction
plans; Site inspection
During construction City of American
Canyon
3869
City of American Canyon
Giovannoni Logistics Center Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 4 https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/5460/54600001/MMRP/54600001 Giovannoni Logistics Center Project MMRP.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
• All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. Building pads shall be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used.
• Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting
equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum
idling time to 5 minutes (as required by the California Airborne Toxics Control Measure (ATCM) Title 13, Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations). Clear signage
regarding idling restrictions shall be provided for
construction workers at all access points.
• All construction equipment shall be maintained and
properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer’s
specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified mechanic and determined to be running in proper condition prior to operation.
• The prime construction contractor shall post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to
contact regarding dust complaints. The City and the
construction contractor shall take corrective action within 48 hours. The BAAQMD’s phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations.

MM AIR-2b: Prior to the issuance of grading or building permits, the project applicant shall provide the City with documentation demonstrating the use of “Low-VOC”
architectural coatings during the proposed project's
construction. “Low-VOC” architectural coatings used during project construction shall not exceed 50 grams of reactive organic gases (ROG) or volatile organic compounds (VOC) per liter of product.

Submittal of
documentation
Prior to the issuance
of grading or building
permits
City of American
Canyon
MM AIR-2c: Prior to issuing any certificate of occupancy for the proposed project, the project applicant shall provide the City with documentation demonstrating the use of “Low-VOC” Submittal of
documentation
Prior to issuing any
certificate of
City of American
Canyon
3870
City of American Canyon
Giovannoni Logistics Center Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 5 https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/5460/54600001/MMRP/54600001 Giovannoni Logistics Center Project MMRP.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
architectural coatings and electric landscaping equipment during the operation of the proposed project. “Low-VOC” architectural coatings used during project operation shall not exceed 10 grams of reactive organic gases (ROG) or volatile organic compounds (VOC) per liter of product. Landscaping equipment referred to in this requirement shall include lawnmowers, leaf blowers, and chainsaws.
occupancy for the
proposed project
MM AIR-2d: Prior to issuing the certificate of occupancy for the proposed project, the project applicant shall provide the City with documentation demonstrating the use of a truck fleet that meets or exceeds model year 2014 for all heavy-duty trucks during operation of the proposed project. If the project applicant does not own the truck fleet that would be used during operation of the proposed project, the project applicant shall provide the City with documentation from the truck fleet owner or operator demonstrating that trucks utilized for operation of the proposed project will meet or exceed model year 2014. If any change occurs where a new truck fleet is utilized during operation of the proposed project, the project applicant shall provide the City with documentation
demonstrating that the new truck fleet meets or exceeds this requirement.

Submittal of
documentation
Prior to issuing the
certificate of
occupancy for the
proposed project
City of American
Canyon
MM AIR-2e: Prior to the issuance of the certificate of
occupancy for each building with dock doors, signage shall be Site inspection Prior to the issuance
of the certificate of
occupancy for each
City of American
Canyon
3871
City of American Canyon
Giovannoni Logistics Center Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 6 https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/5460/54600001/MMRP/54600001 Giovannoni Logistics Center Project MMRP.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
posted identifying idling restrictions and contact information to report violations to the building manager.
building with dock
doors
MM AIR-2f: Prior to the issuance of the certificate of
occupancy for each building with a separate end user, the City shall confirm that the end user has prepared a Transportation Demand Management Plan (TDM Plan). The TDM Plan shall be prepared by a qualified transportation consultant and identify strategies to reduce single-occupant vehicle trips. Examples of TDM strategies may include but are not limited to:
• Ridesharing/Ride Matching
• Vanpools
• Transit subsidies
• Preferential parking for rideshare or vanpool vehicles • Employee lockers
• Secure bicycle parking
• Employee locker rooms
• Provide TDM information in employee breakroom
Submittal of
documentation
Prior to the issuance
of the certificate of
occupancy for each
building with a
separate end user
City of American
Canyon
MM AIR-2g: As a part of future lease agreements, the project proponent shall provide all future tenants at the project site information on available California Air Resources Board (ARB) and Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD)
incentive programs, such as the Carl Moyer Program and the Voucher Incentive Program, that support upgrading truck fleets to clean air technology equipment.

Submittal of
documentation
Prior to the issuance
of the certificate of
occupancy
City of American
Canyon

3.3 Biological Resources
MM BIO-1a: Pre-construction surveys for Swainson’s hawk shall be conducted in the project site vicinity prior to initiation of project construction activities and each year following initiation of construction if project activities are delayed or discontinued for 7 or more days prior to the first required survey period (March 20 to April 5), and are scheduled to Notes on construction
plans; Submittal of
documentation; Site
inspection
Prior to initiation of
project construction
activities and each
year following
initiation of
construction if
City of American
Canyon
3872
City of American Canyon
Giovannoni Logistics Center Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 7 https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/5460/54600001/MMRP/54600001 Giovannoni Logistics Center Project MMRP.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
recommence construction activities during the second survey period but before August 1. These pre-construction surveys shall include investigation of all potential nesting trees within a half-mile radius around all project activities and shall be completed for at least two survey periods immediately prior to commencement of project construction. Surveys shall be
conducted in accordance with CDFW’s “Recommended timing and methodology for Swainson’s Hawk Nesting Surveys in
California’s Central Valley” (CDFW 2000) to maximize the potential for locating nesting Swainson’s hawk and reduce the potential for nest failures due to project activities and/or disturbances.

If no nesting Swainson’s hawk are found during the first or second required survey period starting March 20, and
extending to April 20, then project construction may
commence. If during the third survey (June 10 to July 30) Swainson’s hawk are found to be nesting in the project vicinity and construction has commenced, it shall be assumed the Swainson’s hawk commenced nesting and thus the Swainson’s hawk are habituated to the ambient level of noise and
disturbance emanating from the project site.

If Swainson’s hawk are found to be nesting within 0.25 mile of the project site, a non-disturbance buffer shall be established to keep all construction activities a minimum of 0.25 mile from the nest site. The CDFW shall be consulted regarding the adequacy of the buffer established by the qualified Raptor Biologist. At that time the necessity for acquiring a Fish and Game Section 2081 Incidental Take Permit (ITP) authorization would be determined. An ITP authorization shall be required if there were a valid concern the project activities would result in the “take” of an adult Swainson’s hawk, eggs, or nestlings.

Surveys shall be conducted by a qualified Raptor Biologist with at least a minimum of a 4-year college degree in wildlife project activities are
delayed or
discontinued for 7 or
more days prior to
the second survey
period (March 20 to
April 5)
3873
City of American Canyon
Giovannoni Logistics Center Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 8 https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/5460/54600001/MMRP/54600001 Giovannoni Logistics Center Project MMRP.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
biology or related environmental science, familiarity with Swainson’s hawk and its local ecology, and 2 years of
experience surveying for and detecting Swainson’s hawk
pursuant to “Recommended timing and methodology for
Swainson’s Hawk Nesting Surveys in California’s Central Valley” survey protocol. No disturbance such as construction or earthmoving activity shall occur within the established buffer zone until it is determined by a qualified Raptor Biologist that the young have fledged or that the nesting cycle is complete based on monitoring of the active nest by a qualified Biologist.

MM BIO-1b: No more than 30 days prior to the first ground disturbance activity, pre-construction golden eagle nesting surveys shall be conducted in the project vicinity by a qualified Raptor Biologist. The qualified Raptor Biologist shall have a minimum of a 4-year college degree in wildlife biology or related environmental science, at least 2 years conducting wildlife surveys, and a familiarity with golden eagle and its local ecology. Pre-construction surveys shall include
investigation of all potential nesting trees within a survey area determined by the qualified Raptor Biologist, but no less than a 1-mile radius around all project activities. If active golden eagle nests are identified within any trees within the survey areas a 1-mile radius of the project site, a qualified Raptor Biologist shall establish a protection buffer of approximately 1 mile that is adequate to ensure noise or activity from the proposed project would not cause nest disturbance of young or adult bird mortality. Buffer zones may vary in size as some golden eagles are more acclimated to disturbance than others. Size of buffer zone may be modified by the qualified Raptor Biologist considering the type of construction activity that may occur and the behavioral factors and extent that golden eagle may have acclimated to disturbance. No construction or
earthmoving activity shall occur within the established buffer zone until it is determined by a qualified Raptor Biologist that Notes on construction
plans; Submittal of
documentation; Site
inspection
No more than 30
days prior to the first
ground disturbance
activity
City of American
Canyon
3874
City of American Canyon
Giovannoni Logistics Center Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 9 https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/5460/54600001/MMRP/54600001 Giovannoni Logistics Center Project MMRP.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
the young golden eagles have fledged or that the nesting cycle is complete based on monitoring of the active nest by a qualified Biologist.

MM BIO-1c: Prior to ground disturbance, a pre-construction nesting survey shall be conducted for northern harrier and short-eared owl by a qualified Raptor Biologist if construction is scheduled during the nesting season (February 1 through September 1). The qualified Raptor Biologist shall have at least 2 years of experience surveying for and detecting nesting northern harrier and short-eared owl. To determine whether northern harrier or short-eared owl is nesting on-site, a qualified Raptor Biologist(s) shall conduct walking transects through the project site grassland habitat searching for nests and minimum 500-foot radius from the project site. Where the survey area encroaches onto private property not accessible to the public (e.g., fenced in commercial property, residential backyard, etc., the qualified Biologist shall either contact the property owner for permission to physically access the
property or conduct a visual survey of adjacent areas by scanning with binoculars or a spotting scope. An active northern harrier or short-eared owl nest must be protected by implementing a minimum 500-foot radius buffer zone around the nest marked with orange construction fencing. If an active nest is located outside of the project site, the buffer shall be extended onto the project site and demarcated where it
intersects the project site. Size of buffer zone could be modified increased considering the type of construction activity that may occur, physical barriers between the
construction site and active nest, and the behavioral factors and extent that northern harrier or short-eared owl may have acclimated to disturbance. No construction or earthmoving activity shall occur within the established buffer zone until it is determined by a qualified Raptor Biologist that the young have fledged or that the nesting cycle is otherwise determined to be Notes on construction
plans; Submittal of
documentation; Site
inspection
Prior to ground
disturbance
City of American
Canyon
3875
City of American Canyon
Giovannoni Logistics Center Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 10 https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/5460/54600001/MMRP/54600001 Giovannoni Logistics Center Project MMRP.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
complete based on monitoring of the active nest by a qualified Raptor Biologist.

MM BIO-1d: Prior to any ground disturbance, pre-construction surveys for burrowing owl shall be conducted within a
minimum of 150 meters of the project site. Where the survey area encroaches onto private property not accessible to the public (e.g., fenced in commercial property, residential backyard, etc.), the qualified Biologist shall either contact the property owner for permission to physically access the
property or conduct a visual survey of adjacent areas by scanning with binoculars or a spotting scope. The preconstruction surveys shall be conducted within 2 weeks prior to the onset of any ground-disturbing activities. Surveys shall be conducted by a qualified Biologist following California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) 2012 staff report survey methods and Biologist qualifications to establish the status of burrowing owl on the project site.
• If burrowing owl are found to occupy the project site during the nonbreeding season (September 1 to January 31),
occupied burrows shall be avoided by establishing a nodisturbance buffer zone a minimum of 100 feet around the burrow. Buffers may be adjusted to address site-specific conditions using the impact assessment approach described in the CDFW 2012 staff report. If a qualified Raptor Biologist determines the location of an occupied burrow/s may be
impacted even with a 100-foot buffer, or the burrow(s) are in a location(s) on the project site where a buffer cannot be established without preventing the proposed project from moving forward, then a passive relocation effort may be instituted to relocate the individual(s) out of harm’s way pursuant to a Burrowing Owl Exclusion Plan prepared in
accordance with the CDFW 2012 staff report.
• If burrowing owl are found to be present during the
breeding season (February 1 to August 31), the proposed Notes on construction
plans; Submittal of
documentation; Site
inspection
Prior to any ground
disturbance
City of American
Canyon
3876
City of American Canyon
Giovannoni Logistics Center Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 11 https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/5460/54600001/MMRP/54600001 Giovannoni Logistics Center Project MMRP.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
project ground-disturbing activities shall follow the CDFW 2012 staff report recommended avoidance protocol
whereby occupied burrows shall be avoided with a nodisturbance buffer. • If burrowing owls are ultimately found on the site and burrow eviction/ relocation of burrowing owls during the non-nesting season is a selected strategy to move forward with the project without direct impacts to burrowing owl individuals, the applicant shall coordinate this effort with CDFW and provide habitat mitigation consistent with the 2012 CDFW Staff Report on burrowing owl.

MM BIO-2: To offset the loss of the 0.496 acre of seasonal wetland impacts from Phase 1, and 2.57 acres of seasonal wetlands and 1.13 acres of vernal pools from Phase 2, and to ensure there is no-net loss of wetland area, the applicant shall establish/create 0.992 acre of palustrine emergent wetlands (2:1 ratio) for Phase 1 concurrent with project construction, and 2.57 acres of seasonal wetlands (1:1 ratio) and 1.13 acres of vernal pool wetlands (1:1 ratio) for Phase 2 at least 1 year prior to the start of Phase 2 construction, on the 45-acre Wetland Preserve. The established/created wetlands will be constructed a minimum of 20 feet from the Napa Logistics Park sewer and recycled water pipeline easement or unpaved
access road associated with the easement. The
established/created wetlands shall be monitored for a
minimum of 5 years to ensure the wetlands meet the USACE’s and RWQCB’s definition of a wetland.

Submittal of
documentation
Prior to issuance of
grading permits
City of American
Canyon
MM BIO-3a: Prior to issuance of the Phase 1 grading permit, the project applicant shall apply for and obtain a Nationwide Permit from the San Francisco District of the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) for discharge within 0.004 acre of wetlands/waters of the United States under Clean Water Act Section 404 jurisdiction. For the USACE permit to be Submittal of
documentation
Prior to issuance of
the Phase 1 grading
permit
City of American
Canyon; San
Francisco District of
the United States
Army Corps of
Engineers; San
3877
City of American Canyon
Giovannoni Logistics Center Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 12 https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/5460/54600001/MMRP/54600001 Giovannoni Logistics Center Project MMRP.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
valid, the applicant shall apply for and obtain the
accompanying Section 401 Water Quality Certification from the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (San Francisco Bay RWQCB). The applicant shall apply for and obtain a separate Waiver of Waste Discharge Requirements from the San Francisco Bay RWQCB for impacts to 0.496 acre of
wetlands/waters of the State. To offset the loss of 0.496 acre of permanent wetland impacts and to ensure there is no-net loss of wetland area, the applicant shall establish/create 0.992 acre of wetlands (2:1 ratio), prior to or concurrent with the start of construction, on the 45-acre Wetland Preserve. The
established/created wetlands shall be monitored for a
minimum of 5 years to ensure the wetlands meet the USACE’s and RWQCB’s definition of a wetland. The applicant shall implement the terms of the approved permit(s).

Francisco Bay
Regional Water
Quality Control
Board
MM BIO-3b: Prior to issuance of the Phase 2 grading permit, the project applicant shall apply for and obtain an Individual Permit from the San Francisco District of the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) for the placement of fill material within approximately 3.7 acres of wetlands/waters of the United States under Clean Water Act Section 404
jurisdiction. For the USACE permit to be valid, the applicant shall apply for and obtain the accompanying Section 401 Water Quality Certification from the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (San Francisco Bay RWQCB). The applicant shall apply for and obtain a separate Waiver of Waste Discharge Requirements from the San Francisco Bay RWQCB for the discharge of fill material within approximately 3.7 acres of waters of the State. To offset the loss of 3.7 acres of permanent wetland impacts and to ensure there is no-net loss of wetland area or permanent loss of functions and values, the applicant shall establish/create 2.57 acres of seasonal wetlands (1:1 ratio) and 1.13 acres of vernal pools (1:1 ratio), at a minimum of 1 year prior to the start of construction, on the 45- Submittal of
documentation
Prior to issuance of
the Phase 2 grading
permit
City of American
Canyon; San
Francisco District of
the United States
Army Corps of
Engineers; San
Francisco Bay
Regional Water
Quality Control
Board
3878
City of American Canyon
Giovannoni Logistics Center Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 13 https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/5460/54600001/MMRP/54600001 Giovannoni Logistics Center Project MMRP.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
acre Wetland Preserve. The established/created wetlands and vernal pools shall be monitored for a minimum of 5 years to ensure the wetlands meet the USACE’s and RWQCB’s definition of a wetland. The applicant shall implement the terms of the approved permit(s).

MM BIO-3c: Prior to issuance of the Phase 1 grading permit, a Wetland Mitigation and Monitoring Plan shall be prepared and submitted to the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (San Francisco Bay RWQCB) for review as part of the process for obtaining a permit from the agency. The Wetland Mitigation and Monitoring Plan shall address the loss of 0.496 acre of wetlands impact due to Phase 1 of the
proposed project as well as the potential loss of approximately

3.7 acres of wetlands that as part of Phase 2. The Wetland Mitigation and Monitoring Plan shall include in irrevocable instrument (e.g., deed restriction or conservation easements) that shall restrict use of both the 0.992 acre of created wetlands for Phase 1 as well as approximately 3.7 acres of additional wetlands created for Phase 2. The Wetland
Mitigation and Monitoring Plan shall also include a long-term endowment that would be fully funded by the proposed
project to manage approximately 45-acre open space preserve and created wetlands in perpetuity. If additional wetland mitigation lands are required to compensate for wetland impacts associated with Phase 2, wetlands shall be
established/created at a minimum 1:1 ratio (1 acre
established/created for every acre permanently impacted) on appropriate mitigation land, approved by the RWQCB and
United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), within the Phase 2 project site’s Hydraulic Unit Code (HUC) 10 watershed.

The established/created wetlands shall be monitored for a minimum of 5 years to ensure the wetlands meet the USACE’s and RWQCB’s definition of a wetland. The applicant shall implement the terms of the approved permit(s).

Submittal of
documentation
Prior to issuance of
the Phase 1 grading
permit
City of American
Canyon; San
Francisco Bay
Regional Water
Quality Control
Board
3879
City of American Canyon
Giovannoni Logistics Center Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 14 https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/5460/54600001/MMRP/54600001 Giovannoni Logistics Center Project MMRP.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
MM BIO-3d: Prior to issuance of the Phase 1 and Phase 2 grading permit, a Wetland Mitigation and Monitoring Plan shall be submitted to the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (San Francisco Bay RWQCB) for review as part of the process for obtaining a permit from the agency. The Wetland Mitigation and Monitoring Plan shall be prepared in accordance with the Subpart J–Compensatory Mitigation for Losses of Aquatic Resources outlined in the California State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board)
Procedures, and in accordance with the State Water Board Implementation Guidance dated April 2020, and in accordance with the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
Compensatory Mitigation Rule (33 Code of Federal Regulations Part 332)
The basic objective of the Wetland Mitigation and Monitoring Plan is to ensure that project wetland impacts, and
compensatory mitigation proposed to offset the wetland
impacts, shall provide a no-net-loss of area of wetlands, and wetlands established/created shall be in-kind to the wetlands impacted. In summary, the Wetland Mitigation and Monitoring Plan shall at a minimum:

1. Preserve 7.58 acres of existing seasonal wetlands and 0.13 acre of vernal pools within the 45-acre Wetland Preserve.

2. Establish within the Wetland Preserve approximately 0.992 acre of seasonal wetlands in advance of or concurrent with implementation of Phase 1 impacts to 0.496 acre of
palustrine emergent wetlands at a 2:1 ratio.

3. Establish within the Wetland Preserve approximately 2.57 acres of seasonal wetlands and 1.13 acres of vernal pools in advance of implementation of future Phase 2, assuming
Phase 2 is built out, to address the potential maximum
losses of approximately 3.7 acres of wetlands that may
occur.

Submittal of
documentation
Prior to issuance of
the Phase 1 and
Phase 2 grading
permit
City of American
Canyon; San
Francisco Bay
Regional Water
Quality Control
Board
3880
City of American Canyon
Giovannoni Logistics Center Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 15 https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/5460/54600001/MMRP/54600001 Giovannoni Logistics Center Project MMRP.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial

4. Provide financial assurances to ensure a high level of confidence that the compensatory mitigation shall be
successfully completed, in accordance with applicable
performance standards.

5. Design ecological performance standards to assess whether the Wetland Mitigation and Monitoring Plan is achieving the overall objectives, so that it can be objectively evaluated to determine whether it is developing into the desired resource type (vernal pool, seasonal wetland e.g.), and attaining any other applicable metrics such as acres, number of native plant species, water saturation and/or ponding depth etc.

6. Monitor the site for a duration necessary to determine whether the Wetland Mitigation and Monitoring Plan is
meeting the performance standards. Established palustrine emergent wetlands and vernal pools typically develop
quickly on soils with clay restrictive horizon. The 45-acre Wetland Preserve does have a clay restrictive layer
approximately 8–18 inches below the surface therefore a 5- year monitoring period would be sufficient to determine whether performance standards are met. This monitoring
period may be extended if performance standards are not met due to how the wetlands were constructed or natural events such as severe droughts.

7. Protect the approximately 45-acre Wetland Preserve in perpetuity using a conservation easement, and provide an endowment sufficient to fund the Long-Term Management
Plan.

8. An overall assessment of the condition of the wetlands that shall be permanently impacted by the proposed project shall be conducted using the California Rapid Assessment Method (CRAM) for depressional wetlands, or a hybrid approach
based on CRAM. Each similar wetland type that may be
impacted shall be assessed to describe the floristic
community and record the native and non-native dominant 3881
City of American Canyon
Giovannoni Logistics Center Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 16 https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/5460/54600001/MMRP/54600001 Giovannoni Logistics Center Project MMRP.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
plants within the vernal pool and palustrine emergent
wetlands. Physical structure such as topographic complexity and physical features that may provide habitat for aquatic species (e.g., boulders, woody debris etc.) shall be recorded and used to design the created/established wetlands. The purpose of this assessment is to ensure the design of the wetlands shall provide habitat that is similar to the wetlands being impacted to ensure the impacted wetlands are
mitigated in-kind
Performance Standards
Performance Standards shall include at a minimum the
following:

Years 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 Performance Standards for Wetland Hydrology
Each year wetland hydrology shall be measured during the winter when surface and/or subsurface hydrology would be observable. A minimum of 1 data point shall be taken in each of the established/created wetlands. In addition, wetland hydrologic indicators shall be recorded each spring during the vegetation monitoring period.

Year 1:

Performance standard would be met for Year 1-5 if:
• The created wetlands remain inundated to a minimum depth of 0.5 inch or greater for at least 7 days and/or saturated for at least 14 days and/or at least one primary or two
secondary wetland hydrology indicators listed in the Arid West Region Wetland Determination Data Forms are
recorded.

Contingency Measures:

If the annual performance standard is not being met for any given monitoring year the Permittee shall prepare an analysis of the cause(s) of failure and, if determined necessary, 3882
City of American Canyon
Giovannoni Logistics Center Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 17 https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/5460/54600001/MMRP/54600001 Giovannoni Logistics Center Project MMRP.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
implement remedial action. If the Plan Area has not met the performance standard, the Permittee’s maintenance and
monitoring obligations shall continue until the RWQCB and USACE give final project confirmation.

Remedial action may include re-grading to achieve wetland hydrology, which would improve hydric soil formation.

Years 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 Performance Standards for Increase in Colonization of Wetland Vegetation
Each year during the spring or early summer wetland
vegetation cover shall be measured by conducting a site visit and recording absolute cover and dominant plant species observed within the wetland buffer area. A minimum of 1 data point shall be taken in each of the established/created wetlands. The colonization of wetland vegetation shall be measured by determining overall absolute plant cover values each year. Thisshall be accomplished by measuring absolute cover values within a 5-foot radius sample plot every 50 feet along a transect through each established/created wetland. In addition, to monitor for invasive plant species within the uplands which are not detected in the baseline survey, a minimum of three 5-foot radius sample plots on the east side and three on the west side will be placed at random upland locations along a linear transect east to west within the Wetland Preserve. During Year 4 and 5 the managed
landscaped areas within the development will be visually surveyed for evidence of invasive plant species. Performance Standards for each monitoring year are listed below.

Year 1:

Performance standard would be metfor Year 1 if:
• At least one hydrophytic plantspecies colonizes the
established/created seasonal wetlands and vernal pools; and 3883
City of American Canyon
Giovannoni Logistics Center Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 18 https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/5460/54600001/MMRP/54600001 Giovannoni Logistics Center Project MMRP.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
• The average absolute cover of wetland vegetation within an established/created seasonal wetlands and vernal pools is 5 percent or greater.

Year 2:

Year 3:

Performance standard would be metfor Year 3 if:
• Atleast two hydrophytic plantspecies colonizes the
established/created seasonal wetlands;
• At least two native hydrophytic plantspecies colonizes the established/created vernal pools and at least one is a vernal pool habitat indicator species; and
• The average absolute cover of wetland vegetation within an established/created seasonal wetlands and vernal pools is 20 percent or greater and comprised of native and naturalized species.

Year 4:

Performance standard would be metfor Year 4 if:
• Atleast two hydrophytic plantspecies colonize the
established/created seasonal wetlands.
• At least two native hydrophytic plantspecies colonizes the established/created vernal pools and at least one is a vernal pool habitat indicator species.
• The average absolute cover of wetland vegetation within an established/created seasonal wetland and vernal pool is 30 percent or greater.
3884
City of American Canyon
Giovannoni Logistics Center Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 19 https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/5460/54600001/MMRP/54600001 Giovannoni Logistics Center Project MMRP.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
• To meet the wetland performance standard invasive plant species within the wetlands shall not comprise greater than 5 percent of the total absolute cover. To meet the upland performance standard, invasive plant species, which currently are not supported in the uplands within the Wetland Preserve, shall not comprise greater than 5 percent of the total absolute cover. Invasive plants shall be defined as species rated as “High” by California Invasive Plant Council (Cal-IPC) and species on the ”Alert” or “Watch” list with a High rating. • The managed landscaped areas within the development will be visually surveyed for evidence of invasive plant species.

To meet the managed landscape performance standard,
invasive plant species, which currently are not supported in the uplands within the Wetland Preserve, shall not comprise greater than 5 percent of the total absolute cover. Invasive plants shall be defined as species rated as “High” by
California Invasive Plant Council (Cal-IPC) and species on the ”Alert” or “Watch” list with a High rating.

Year 5:

Performance standard would be metfor Year 5 if:
• At least two hydrophytic plantspecies documented during the CRAM assessment for the palustrine emergent wetlands impacted on the Phase 1 project site colonize the
established/created seasonal wetlands.
• At least two native vernal pool habitat indicator species documented during the CRAM assessment for the vernal
pool on the Phase 2 project site colonizes the
established/created vernal pools.
• The average absolute cover of wetland vegetation within the established/created seasonal wetland (non-vernal pool
wetlands) is 40 percent or greater; and the average absolute cover of wetland vegetation within the established/created vernal poolsis 40 percent or greater of which greater than 50 3885
City of American Canyon
Giovannoni Logistics Center Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 20 https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/5460/54600001/MMRP/54600001 Giovannoni Logistics Center Project MMRP.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
percent of the vegetation cover consists of two or more dominate native vernal pool habitat indicator plants.
• To meet the wetland performance standard invasive plant species within the wetlands shall not comprise greater than 5 percent of the total absolute cover. To meet the upland performance standard, invasive plant species, which
currently are not supported in the uplands, within the
Wetland Preserve shall not comprise greater than 5 percent of the total absolute cover. Invasive plants shall be defined as species rated as “High” by California Invasive Plant Council (Cal-IPC) and species on the ”Alert” or “Watch” list with a High rating.
• The managed landscaped areas within the development will be visually surveyed for evidence of invasive plant species.

Contingency Measures:

If the annual performance standard is not being met for any given monitoring year the Permittee shall prepare an analysis of the cause(s) of failure and, if determined necessary, implement remedial action. Remedial action may include
hydroseeding with native species, or addition of supplemental topsoil or mulch to promote growth, control of invasive using mechanical equipment, grazing animals.

Year 5 No-Net-Loss Performance Standard for Phase 1 Impacts Performance standard would be met for Year 5 when;
3886
City of American Canyon
Giovannoni Logistics Center Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 21 https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/5460/54600001/MMRP/54600001 Giovannoni Logistics Center Project MMRP.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
• A wetland delineation is performed and verified by the USACE and confirms a minimum of 0.992 acre of wetlands
have been established/created within the Wetland Preserve.

Year 5 No-Net-Loss Performance Standard for Phase 2 Impacts The Phase 2 no-net-loss performance standard would be
measured when an application for the Phase 2 project is submitted to the RWQCB and USACE, and the Phase 2 project is approved. Once Phase 2 has been approved by the RWQCB and USACE, this performance standard may be modified
depending on the level of wetland impacts authorized by the RWQCB and USACE, meaning this performance standard may
decrease if the wetlands impacted for Phase 1 are less than 3.7 acres.

Performance standard would be met for Year 5 when;
• A wetland delineation is performed and verified by the USACE and confirms a minimum of 2.57 acres of seasonal
wetland and 1.13 acres of vernal pools have been
established/created within the Wetland Preserve.

Year 5 Long-Term Protection and Long-Term Funding
Performance standard would be met for Year 5 once:
• The Wetland Preserve has been placed under a conservation easement; and
• A long-term financing mechanism (e.g., non-wasting
endowment, trusts, contractual arrangement etc.) to fund implementation of the long-term management of the
Wetland Preserve has been secured.

MM BIO-4: If construction occurs during the breeding season of migratory and resident birds (February 1 to August 31), a qualified Biologist shall conduct a pre-construction breeding bird survey in areas of suitable habitat within 7 days prior to the onset of construction activity. Surveys shall be conducted Notes on construction
plans; Submittal of
documentation; Site
inspection
If construction occurs
during the breeding
season of migratory
and resident birds
City of American
Canyon
3887
City of American Canyon
Giovannoni Logistics Center Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 22 https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/5460/54600001/MMRP/54600001 Giovannoni Logistics Center Project MMRP.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
within the project footprint and 100 feet from the construction limits for nesting passerines, 250 feet from the construction limits for nesting accipiters and a minimum of 500 feet from the construction limits for nesting raptors. If the survey area is found to be absent of nesting birds, no further mitigation would be required. However, if construction activities are delayed by more than 7 days, an additional nesting bird survey shall be performed. If bird nests are found, appropriate buffer zones shall be established around all active nests to protect nesting adults and their young from direct or indirect impacts related to project construction disturbance. Size of buffer zones shall be determined per recommendations of the
qualified Biologist based on site conditions and species involved, but typical buffers around active nests are 500 feet for large raptors such as buteos, 250 feet for small raptors such as accipiters, and 100 feet for passerines (songbirds) and other bird species. For special-status species, a 0.25-mile buffer shall be established for nesting Swainson’s hawk; 1 mile for golden eagle; and a 500-foot buffer for nesting tricolored blackbirds. If an active nest is located outside of the project site, the buffer shall be extended onto the project site and demarcated where it intersects the project site. Buffer zones shall be maintained until it can be documented that either the nest has failed, or the young have fledged.
(February 1 to
August 31)

3.4 Cultural Resources and Tribal Cultural Resources
MM CUL-2a: No ground disturbance shall take place within 100 feet of informal archaeological resource 483A-001. The
resource shall be preserved in place.

Notes on construction
plans; Site inspection
During construction City of American
Canyon
MM CUL-2b: An Archaeologist who meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards for archaeology shall be present on-site during all earth disturbing activities. If prehistoric or historic-period archaeological resources are encountered, all construction activities within 100 feet of the Notes on construction
plans; Site inspection;
Submittal of
documentation
During construction City of American
Canyon
3888
City of American Canyon
Giovannoni Logistics Center Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 23 https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/5460/54600001/MMRP/54600001 Giovannoni Logistics Center Project MMRP.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
find shall halt and the City of American Canyon shall be notified. Prehistoric archaeological materials may include obsidian and chert flaked stone tools (e.g., projectile points, knives, scrapers) or toolmaking debris; culturally darkened soil (“midden”) containing heat-affected rocks, artifacts, or shellfish remains; and stone milling equipment (e.g., mortars, pestles, hand stones, or milling slabs); and battered stone tools, such as hammerstones and pitted stones. Historic-period materials might include stone, concrete, or adobe footings and walls; filled wells or privies; and deposits of metal, glass, and/or ceramic refuse.

Treatment for most resources would consist of (but would not be limited to) sample excavation, artifact collection, and site documentation, with the aim to target the recovery of
important scientific data contained in the portion(s) of the significant resource to be impacted by the proposed project.

The treatment plan shall include provisions for analysis of data in a regional context, reporting of results within a timely 3889
City of American Canyon
Giovannoni Logistics Center Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 24 https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/5460/54600001/MMRP/54600001 Giovannoni Logistics Center Project MMRP.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
manner, curation of artifacts and data at an approved facility, and dissemination of reports to local and State repositories, libraries, and interested professionals.

MM CUL-3: In the event of the accidental discovery or
recognition of any human remains, CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5, Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, and Public Resources Code Sections 5097.94 and Section 5097.98 shall be followed. If during project construction, there is accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains, the following steps shall be taken:

1. There shall be no further excavation or disturbance within 100 feet of the remains until the County Coroner is
contacted to determine whether the remains are Native
American and if an investigation of the cause of death is required. If the Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Coroner shall contact the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) within 24 hours, and the NAHC shall identify the person or persons it believes to be the Most Likely Descendant (MLD) of the deceased Native
American. The MLD may make recommendations to the
landowner or the person responsible for the excavation work within 48 hours, for means of treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains, and any associated grave goods as provided in Public Resource Code Section 5097.98.

Notes on construction
plans; Site inspection;
Submittal of
documentation
During construction City of American
Canyon
3890
City of American Canyon
Giovannoni Logistics Center Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 25 https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/5460/54600001/MMRP/54600001 Giovannoni Logistics Center Project MMRP.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
• The descendant identified fails to make a
recommendation.
• The landowner or authorized representative rejects the recommendation of the descendant, and mediation by the
NAHC fails to provide measures acceptable to the
landowner.

Additionally, California Public Resources Code Section 15064.5 requires the following relative to Native American Remains:
• When an initial study identifies the existence of, or the probable likelihood of, Native American Remains within a project, a lead agency shall work with the appropriate
Native Americans as identified by the NAHC as provided in Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. The applicant may each develop a plan with respect to their respective
individual development proposals for treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains, and any items associated with Native American Burials with the
appropriate Native Americans as identified by the NAHC.

MM CUL-4: A Tribal Monitor representing the Yocha Dehe
Wintun Nation shall be present during all project-related ground disturbance. Additionally, the Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation’s Treatment Protocol (Protocol) shall be followed with respect to Tribal Cultural Resources (TCRs). The purpose of the protocol is to formalize procedures for the treatment of Native American human remains, grave goods, ceremonial items, and items of cultural patrimony, if any are found in conjunction with development, including archaeological studies,
excavation, geotechnical investigations, grading, and any ground-disturbing activity. This Protocol also formalizes procedures for Tribal Monitoring during archaeological studies, grading, and ground-disturbing activities.

Notes on construction
plans; Site inspection;
Submittal of
documentation
During construction City of American
Canyon
3891
City of American Canyon
Giovannoni Logistics Center Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 26 https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/5460/54600001/MMRP/54600001 Giovannoni Logistics Center Project MMRP.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial

1. Cultural Affiliation: The Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation (Tribe) traditionally occupied lands in Yolo, Solano, Lake, Colusa, and Napa Counties. The Tribe has designated its Cultural
Resources Committee (Committee) to act on the Tribe's
behalf with respect to the provisions of this Protocol. Any human remains which are found in conjunction with projects on lands culturally affiliated with the Tribe shall be treated in accordance with Section III of this Protocol. Any other cultural resources shall be treated in accordance with
Section IV of this Protocol.

2. Inadvertent Discovery of Native American Human Remains:

Whenever Native American human remains are found during the course of a project, the determination of Most Likely Descendant (MLD) under California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 will be made by the Native American
Heritage Commission (NAHC) upon notification to the NAHC of the discovery of said remains at a project site. If the location of the site and the history and prehistory of the area is culturally affiliated with the Tribe, the NAHC contacts the Tribe; a Tribal member will be designated by the Tribe to consult with the landowner and/or project proponents.

3. Treatment of Native American Remains: In the event that Native American human remains are found during
development of a project and the Tribe or a member of the Tribe is determined to be MLD pursuant to Section II of this Protocol, the following provisions shall apply. The Medical Examiner shall immediately be notified, ground-disturbing activities in that location shall cease and the Tribe shall be 3892
City of American Canyon
Giovannoni Logistics Center Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 27 https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/5460/54600001/MMRP/54600001 Giovannoni Logistics Center Project MMRP.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
allowed, pursuant to California Public Resources Code
Section 5097.98(a), to (1) inspect the site of the discovery and (2) make determinations as to how the human remains and grave goods shall be treated and disposed of with
appropriate dignity. The Tribe shall complete its inspection and make its MLD recommendation within 48 hours of
getting access to the site. The Tribe shall have the final determination as to the disposition and treatment of human remains and grave goods. Said determination may include avoidance of the human remains, reburial on-site, or reburial on tribal or other lands that will not be disturbed in the future. The Tribe may wish to rebury said human remains and grave goods or ceremonial and cultural items on or near the site of their discovery, in an area which will not be subject to future disturbances over a prolonged period of time. Reburial of human remains shall be accomplished in compliance with the California Public Resources Code
Sections 5097.98(a) and (b). The term "human remains"
encompasses more than human bones because the Tribe’s
traditions call for the burial of associated cultural items with the deceased (funerary objects), and/or the ceremonial
burning of Native American human remains, funerary
objects, grave goods, and animals. Ashes, soils, and other remnants of these burning ceremonies, as well as associated funerary objects and unassociated funerary objects buried with or found near the Native American remains are to be treated in the same manner as bones or bone fragments
that remain intact.

4. Non-Disclosure of Location of Reburials: Unless otherwise required by law, the site of any reburial of Native American human remains shall not be disclosed and will not be
governed by public disclosure requirements of the California Public Records Act, California Government Code Section
6250 et seq. The Medical Examiner shall withhold public 3893
City of American Canyon
Giovannoni Logistics Center Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 28 https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/5460/54600001/MMRP/54600001 Giovannoni Logistics Center Project MMRP.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
disclosure of information related to such reburial pursuant to the specific exemption set forth in California Government Code Section 6254(r). The Tribe will require that the location for reburial is recorded with the California Historic Resources Inventory System (CHRIS) on a form acceptable to the CHRIS center. The Tribe may also suggest the landowner enter into an agreement regarding the confidentiality of site
information that will run with title on the property.

5. Treatment of Cultural Resources: Treatment of all cultural items, including ceremonial items and archaeological items will reflect the religious beliefs, customs, and practices of the Tribe. All cultural items, including ceremonial items and archaeological items, which may be found at a project site shall be turned over to the Tribe for appropriate treatment, unless ordered by a court or agency of competent
jurisdiction. The project proponent shall waive any and all claims to ownership of Tribal ceremonial and cultural items, including archaeological items, which may be found on a project site in favor of the Tribe. If any intermediary, (for example, an Archaeologist retained by the project
proponent) is necessary, said entity or individual shall not possess those items for longer than is reasonably necessary, as determined solely by the Tribe.

6. Inadvertent Discoveries: If additional significant sites or sites not identified as significant in a project environmental review process, but later determined to be significant, are located within a project impact area, such sites will be subjected to further archaeological and cultural significance evaluation by the project proponent, the Lead Agency, and the Tribe to determine whether additional mitigation
measures are necessary to treat sites in a culturally
appropriate manner consistent with CEQA requirements for mitigation of impacts to cultural resources. If there are human remains present that have been identified as Native 3894
City of American Canyon
Giovannoni Logistics Center Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 29 https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/5460/54600001/MMRP/54600001 Giovannoni Logistics Center Project MMRP.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
American, all work will cease for a period of up to 30 days in accordance with Federal Law.

3.5 Geology, Soils, and Seismicity
MM GEO-1a: Prior to the issuance of building permits for each Phase 2 structure, the project applicant shall submit plans to the City of American Canyon for review and approval that demonstrate a minimum 50-foot setback between the West
Napa Fault and each building. The approved plans shall be incorporated into the proposed project.

Submittal of
documentation
Prior to the issuance
of building permits
for each Phase 2
structure
City of American
Canyon
MM GEO-1b: Prior to the issuance of building permits for each Phase 1 and 2 structure, the project applicant shall submit a design-level Geotechnical Investigation to the City of American Canyon for review and approval. The investigation shall be prepared by a qualified engineer and identify grading and building practices necessary to achieve compliance with the latest adopted edition of the California Building Standards Code (CBC) geologic, soils, and seismic requirements, including abatement of expansive soil conditions. The report shall also determine the final design parameters for walls, foundations, foundation slabs, and surrounding related improvements (e.g., utilities roadways, parking lots, and sidewalks). The measures identified in the approved report shall be incorporated into the project plans and all applicable construction-related permits.

Submittal of
documentation
Prior to the issuance
of building permits
for each Phase 1 and
2 structure
City of American
Canyon
MM GEO-5: If potential fossils are discovered during project implementation, all earthwork or other types of ground
disturbance within 100 feet of the find shall stop immediately until a qualified professional Paleontologist can assess the nature and importance of the find. Based on the scientific value or uniqueness of the find, the Paleontologist shall either record the find and recommend that the City of American Canyon allow work to continue or recommend salvage and
recovery of the fossil. The Paleontologist shall, if required, Notes on construction
plans; Site inspection;
Submittal of
documentation
During construction City of American
Canyon
3895
City of American Canyon
Giovannoni Logistics Center Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 30 https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/5460/54600001/MMRP/54600001 Giovannoni Logistics Center Project MMRP.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
propose modifications to the stop-work radius based on the nature of the find, site geology, and the activities occurring on the site. If treatment and salvage is required,
recommendations will be consistent with Society of Vertebrate Paleontology guidelines and currently accepted scientific practice. If required, treatment for fossil remains shall include preparation and recovery of fossil materials so that they can be housed in an appropriate museum or university collection, and, if required, shall also include preparation of a report for publication describing the finds.

3.6 Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Energy
MM GHG-1a: Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the project applicant shall provide the City of American Canyon with documentation (e.g., site plans) demonstrating project construction will include the following construction Best Management Practices (BMPs):
• At least 15 percent of the construction fleet for each project phase shall be alternatively fueled or electric.
• At least 10 percent of building materials used for project construction shall be sourced from local suppliers.
• At least 65 percent of construction and demolition waste materials shall be recycled or reused.
• At least one contractor that has a business location in American Canyon shall be contracted for project
construction.
• All construction contracts shall include language that requires all off-road equipment with a power rating below 19 kilowatts (e.g., plate compactors, pressure washers) using during construction be electrically powered.
• Architectural coatings used for project construction shall be “Low-VOC,” containing no greater than 50 grams of volatile organic compounds (VOC) per liter of product.

Submittal of
documentation; Notes on
construction plans; Site
inspection
Prior to the issuance
of any grading
permits
City of American
Canyon
3896
City of American Canyon
Giovannoni Logistics Center Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 31 https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/5460/54600001/MMRP/54600001 Giovannoni Logistics Center Project MMRP.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
• Project construction shall prohibit the use of generators and shall establish grid power connection to electrical
equipment needs.
• Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to 5 minutes (as required by the California Airborne Toxics Control Measure [ATCM] Title 13, Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations). Clear signage regarding idling
restrictions shall be provided for construction workers at all access points.
• All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer’s specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified mechanic and
determined to be running in proper condition prior to
operation.
• The prime construction contractor shall post a publicly visible sign with their telephone number and contractor to contact. The construction contractor shall take corrective action within 48 hours. The BAAQMD’s phone number shall also be identified and visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations.

MM GHG-1b: Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the project applicant shall provide the City of American Canyon with documentation (e.g., site plans) demonstrating the proposed project is designed without the use of any natural gas -fueled appliances or natural gas plumbing.

Submittal of
documentation
Prior to the issuance
of any building
permits
City of American
Canyon
MM GHG-1c: Prior to issuance of any building permits, the project applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City of American Canyon (e.g., shown on-site plans), that the proposed buildings are designed and will be built to, at a minimum, the Tier 2 advanced energy efficiency requirements of the Nonresidential Voluntary Measures of the California Submittal of
documentation
Prior to the issuance
of any building
permits
City of American
Canyon
3897
City of American Canyon
Giovannoni Logistics Center Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 32 https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/5460/54600001/MMRP/54600001 Giovannoni Logistics Center Project MMRP.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
Green Building Standards Code, Division A5.2, Energy
Efficiency, as outlined under Section A5.203.1.2.2.

MM GHG-1d: Prior to issuance of any building permits, the project applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City of American Canyon (e.g., shown on-site plans), that the proposed parking areas for passenger automobiles and trucks are designed and will be built to accommodate electric vehicle (EV) charging stations. At a minimum, the parking shall be designed to accommodate a number of EV charging stations equal to the Tier 2 Nonresidential Voluntary Measures of the California Green Building Standards Code, Section
A5.106.5.3.2.

Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the project applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City of American Canyon (e.g., shown on-site plans), that each loading dock is outfitted with at least one 240-volt outlet to
accommodate truck and Transport Refrigeration Unit (TRU) charging and/or electrical power connection while trucks are loading and unloading goods.

Submittal of
documentation
Prior to the issuance
of any building
permits
City of American
Canyon
MM GHG-1e: Prior to the issuance of any building permit for the proposed project, the project applicant shall provide the City with documentation (e.g., site plans) demonstrating to the City’s satisfaction that the electricity demand will be supplied with 100 percent carbon-free electricity sources through the year 2045.

Submittal of
documentation
Prior to the issuance
of any building
permit for the
proposed project
City of American
Canyon

3.8 Hydrology and Water Quality
MM HYD-1a: Prior to issuance of grading permits for the proposed project, the applicant shall submit to the City of American Canyon for review and approval a Storm Water
Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) in accordance with the requirements of the statewide Construction General Permit.

The SWPPP shall be designed to address the following
Notes on construction
plans; Site inspection;
Submittal of
documentation
Prior to issuance of
grading permits for
the proposed project
City of American
Canyon
3898
City of American Canyon
Giovannoni Logistics Center Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 33 https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/5460/54600001/MMRP/54600001 Giovannoni Logistics Center Project MMRP.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
objectives: (1) all pollutants and their sources (e.g., runoff), including sources of sediment associated with construction, construction site erosion, and all other activities associated with construction activity, are controlled; (2) where not otherwise required to be under a Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) permit, all non-stormwater discharges are identified and either eliminated, controlled, or treated; (3) site Best Management Practices (BMPs) (e.g., silt fencing, street sweeping, routine inspection, etc.) are effective and result in the reduction or elimination of pollutants in stormwater discharges and authorized non-stormwater
discharges from construction activity; and (4) stabilization BMPs are installed to reduce or eliminate pollutants after construction are completed. The SWPPP shall be prepared by a qualified SWPPP developer. The SWPPP shall include the
minimum BMPs required for the identified Risk Level. BMP implementation shall be consistent with the BMP requirements in the most recent version of the California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) Stormwater Best Management
Handbook–Construction or the California Department of
Transportation (Caltrans) Stormwater Quality Handbook
Construction Site BMPs Manual. The SWPPP shall be
implemented during construction.

MM HYD-1b: Prior to the issuance of building permits, the project applicant shall submit a Stormwater Control Plan to the City of American Canyon for review and approval. The plan shall be developed using the California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) “New Development and Redevelopment
Handbook” and include applicable provisions of Section C.3 of the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Municipal Regional Permit (Order No. R2-2015-0049, NPDES Permit No. CAS612008 (or more recent permit). The Stormwater Control Plan shall identify pollution prevention measures and Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control Site inspection; Submittal
of documentation
Prior to the issuance
of building permits
City of American
Canyon
3899
City of American Canyon
Giovannoni Logistics Center Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 34 https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/5460/54600001/MMRP/54600001 Giovannoni Logistics Center Project MMRP.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
stormwater pollution from operational activities and facilities and provide maintenance in perpetuity. The Stormwater
Control Plan shall include Low Impact Development (LID) design concepts, as well as concepts that accomplish a “first flush” objective that remove contaminants from the first 2 inches of stormwater before it enters area waterways. The project applicant shall also prepare and submit an Operations and Maintenance Agreement to the City, identifying
procedures to ensure stormwater quality control measures work properly during operations.

3.9 Land Use
MM LU-3: Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall retain a qualified Biologist to assess potential wildlife hazards to aviation. The assessment shall evaluate the
characteristics of the emergent wetlands, drainages, other potential wildlife attractant features (i.e., ponded water) located within the open space area and identify management practices (e.g., storm drainage, vegetation, etc.) to prevent the creation of attractants for large flocks or birds or other wildlife species that may present safety hazards to aviation activities.

As part of the assessment, the applicant shall consult with Napa County Airport and Napa County Airport Land Use
Commission (ALUC) representatives, as appropriate, regarding findings and recommendations. The applicant shall submit a report to the City of American Canyon prepared by a qualified Biologist that confirms the wildlife hazard assessment’s findings and recommendations are incorporated into the
design of the open space preserve.

Submittal of
documentation
Prior to issuance of
grading permits
City of American
Canyon

3.10 Noise
MM NOI-1: Implementation of the following multi-part
mitigation measure is required to reduce potential
construction period noise impacts:

Notes on construction
plans; Site inspection
During construction City of American
Canyon
3900
City of American Canyon
Giovannoni Logistics Center Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 35 https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/5460/54600001/MMRP/54600001 Giovannoni Logistics Center Project MMRP.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for
Verification
Verification of Completion
Date Initial
• The construction contractor shall ensure that all equipment driven by internal combustion engines shall be equipped with mufflers that are in good condition and appropriate for the equipment.
• The construction contractor shall ensure that unnecessary idling of internal combustion engines (i.e., idling in excess of 5 minutes) is prohibited.
• The construction contractor shall utilize “quiet” models of air compressors and other stationary noise sources where technology exists.
• At all times during project grading and construction, the construction contractor shall ensure that stationary noisegenerating equipment shall be located as far as practicable from sensitive receptors and placed so that emitted noise is directed away from adjacent residences.
• The construction contractor shall ensure that the
construction staging areas shall be located to create the greatest feasible distance between the staging area and noise-sensitive receptors nearest the project site.

The construction contractor shall ensure that all on-site construction activities, including the operation of any tools or equipment used in construction, drilling, repair, alteration, grading, or demolition work, are limited to between the daytime hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday through
Saturday. No construction shall be permitted on Sundays and federal holidays.
3901

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
3902
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON APPROVING THE GIOVANNONI LOGISTICS CENTER PHASE 1 DESIGN PERMIT TO ALLOW UP TO 1,069,904 SQUARE FEET OF HIGH-CUBE WAREHOUSE USES ON 70.2 ACRES LOCATED NORTH OF GREEN ISLAND ROAD AND EAST OF DEVLIN ROAD, APN 057-090-008, 057-130-034, 057-130-036, (FILE NO. PL 20-0042) WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 65300 of the State Planning and Zoning Law, the City of American Canyon (City) adopted a General Plan to provide comprehensive long-range planning and a blueprint of the City’s future form, including land use and circulation maps that specify the roadway network and the distribution of types and intensities of land; and
WHEREAS, Buzz Oates LLC, (“applicant”), submitted a Giovannoni Logistics Center Phase 1 Design Permit application to develop a 70.2-acre area east of Devlin Road fortwo high-cube warehouse buildings totaling 1,069,904 square feet (the proposed project); and
WHEREAS, Building A, located at 300 Green Island Road, is proposed to be 627,976 square feet, and may be rail-served by the adjacent Napa Branch Line; and
WHEREAS, Building B, located at 1200 Devlin Road, is proposed to be 469,512 square feet; and WHEREAS, both buildings would provide docks, grade level roll-up doors, and trailer parking stalls and enclosed with a secure perimeter; and
WHEREAS, access would be restricted to authorized users; and WHEREAS, on November 17, 2022, the Planning Commission conducted a duly-noticed public hearing to evaluate the Giovannoni Logistics Center Phase 1 Design Permit and heard all public speakers and considered all written materials including the staff report and oral testimony given at the meeting; and WHEREAS, on February 21, 2023, the City Council certified that the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH# 2021010104) has been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and as adequately reflects the City’s independent judgement and analysis regarding the potential environmental impacts associated with the Giovannoni Logistics Center Project, and adopt CEQA Findings of Fact, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, for the Project, and adopt the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Project; and
WHEREAS, the Giovannoni Logistics Center Final EIR specifically evaluated the Phase 1 Design Permit at a Project level and the City Council reviewed and considered the information contained in the Final EIR prior to approving the proposed project; and
WHEREAS, on December 6, 2022 and February 21, 2023, the City Council conducted a duly-noticed public hearing to evaluate the Giovannoni Logistics Center Phase 1 Design Permit and heard all public speakers and considered all written materials including the staff report and oral testimony given at the meeting.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council makes all the required findings to approve the Giovannoni Logistics Center Phase 1 Design Permit, as follows:

SECTION 1: Design Permit Findings
ATTACHMENT 2. CC Giovannoni Design
Permit Reso
3903
Approval of the Design Permit requires all the following findings be made, pursuant to American Canyon Municipal Code Section 19.41.050:

A. The project complies with all applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance and any applicable approvals granted for the project by any decision-making authority.

The proposed two warehouses comply with the General Industrial zoning height, bulk, and setback regulations.

B. The project and its design comply with any applicable design guidelines.

The project complies with the design and development principles set out in the General Plan as Policy 1.22.4 and 1.22., as follows:
• The architectural façade includes a variety of colors, materials, and articulating features.

There are changes in color that vary from white and gray. The architectural detailing around windows, building corners, parapet, and articulated sidings of the main entrance gives a sense of human scale. There are also scoring lines on the concrete shell walls that break up the expanse.
• The main entry into the warehouse provides transparent building elements into the ground floor, and the exterior scoring lines gives the external appearance a modern look for an industrial facility. The ground floor of the southern elevation has store-front like windows that capture natural light.
• The façade includes articulation, gray painted squares, and a white parapet trim to provide visual relief and interest.
• The southwest building entrance is clearly identified with the articulated white and grey siding. The entrance also has storefront like windows for natural light. • The building design includes tall parapet to screen rooftop structures and the mechanical equipment and a condition of approval requires adequate equipment screening at the time of building permit issuance.
• The site is well landscaped, including trees throughout the parking areas and along the southern, western, and northern edges of the site, and plantings within the stormwater bioretention area that runs along the northwest side of the site. • There are clearly marked pedestrian routes in the parking lot leading to the front office of the building.

C. The project and its design comply with all applicable general plan policies.

The project complies with all applicable general plan policies because the proposed use is included in the Industrial use designation; the building and site design comply with the Design Guidelines set out in the General Plan as Policy 1.22.4 and 1.22.7; and the project will contribute to the provision of necessary transportation improvements called for in the 2018 Circulation Element update because it will pay the Traffic Impact Fees, as periodically adjusted.

D. The project complies with applicable policies of Napa County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. 3904
The project site falls entirely within Zone D of the Napa County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP) Area. Zone D is characterized by moderate risk, frequent noise intrusion, and routine overflights below 1,000 feet above ground level. The ALUCP indicates that warehousing, low intensity light industrial uses and office uses are normally acceptable uses.

The ALUCP sets forth maximum density criterion of 100 people per net acre for Zone D Therefore, the proposed project complies with the building height requirements of the Napa County Airport land use compatibility plan. As described in the Giovannoni Logistics Center Final EIR (SCH# 2021010104), the maximum site density complies with the density recommendation of no more than 100 persons per net acre.

In addition to the 70.2-acre development site, an additional 45 acres of the project site would be permanently preserved as a Wetland Preserve. This area contains wetlands that currently attract wildlife (e.g., avian species). Avian species are considered potential hazards to aviation activities due to the potential for bird strikes. The two aspects of the proposed project that have the greatest potential for creating aviation safety hazards are the open space area and the stormwater basins.

The proposed project would create new wetland features to offset those impacted as result of the proposed project. However, it would not substantially increase the bird attractant potential because the new compensatory wetlands represent a small portion of the total open space area. Thus, the proposed project would not introduce new aviation hazards in this respect.

The proposed stormwater basins would be designed to drain out within 48 hours of a 10-year storm event. This rapid drainage rate would minimize the amount of time the basins would hold standing water, which, in turn, would reduce their avian attractant attributes. Additionally, standing water would be prevalent in many areas in the project vicinity during and immediately after a storm event; thus, the basins would not represent a greater attractant in this respect. Moreover, the basins are not intended to hold water for extended periods or to be used as an aesthetic water feature.

Furthermore, the proposed project overall would result in an approximately 163-acre reduction in avian foraging habitat as a result of the development of the proposed structures and infrastructure. This would further minimize the avian attractant attributes of the project site relative to existing conditions.

The ALUCP indicates that projects that have the potential to attract wildlife are required to prepare a Wildlife Hazards Assessment. Accordingly, Mitigation Measure LU-3 requires the preparation of such an assessment and implementation of the recommendations into the design of the open space area. This would serve to minimize, if not eliminate, the wildlife attractant attributes in a manner that reduces impacts to a level of less than significant. This mitigation measure has already been satisfied through the preparation by biologists in the consulting firm AECOM of the September 27, 2022, Wildlife Hazard Assessment for the Giovannoni Logistics Center Property. This document concluded, for a variety of reasons, that the proposed project would not cause an increase above the existing level of activity of birds or other wildlife, and thus did not propose any recommendations to modify the open space area design.

The proposed project’s end uses include high-cube warehouse and ancillary office, which are considered normally acceptable by the ALUCP as long as they do not create hazards. In this case, Mitigation Measure AES-3 requires all exterior lighting to use full cut-off fixtures and be directed downward to prevent interference with Napa County Airport operations. Moreover, the proposed project would reduce the amount of natural vegetation on the project site by 163 acres. The proposed project also would include landscaping and on-site drainage facilities that would be designed and managed to discourage wildlife use of the site. Mitigation Measure LU-3 requires the applicant to retain a qualified Biologist to prepare a 3905
wildlife hazard assessment that would identify any measures needed to reduce the bird attractant potential of the wetland area, consistent with the ALUCP’s policies. Collectively, the implementation of these two mitigation measures would ensure that the proposed project would not create hazards to aviation. As noted above, Mitigation Measure LU-3 has already been satisfied. The September 27, 2022, Wildlife Hazard Assessment for the Giovannoni Logistics Center Property summarized its key conclusions as follows:

The buildings associated with the project development site are not expected to result in a significant attraction of birds or other wildlife to the property. Some vegetation will be removed and replaced with buildings, resulting in the reduction of existing non-native grassland habitat within the development site. Anticipated changes to the existing wildlife habitat associated with the proposed construction activities include grading, excavation, permanent development, storm water controls, lighting, irrigation, noise, and increased human presence.

The development of Phase 1 and Phase 2 features is unlikely to result in an increase in wildlife activity due to the disturbances caused by the lighting, human presence, and noise associated with the new development site, in addition to the existing baseline noise and activity from nearby vehicular traffic and the Napa County Airport air and vehicular traffic. Natural or man-made features that could attract wildlife to the property post-construction include the proposed stormwater retention basins; however, the stormwater retention basins are unlikely to result in significant additional wildlife attraction because the systems are designed for quick drainage, and because the basins will be surrounded by development.

A majority of the wetland impacts will be mitigated at a 1:1 ratio, with only 0.496 acres of net gain in palustrine emergent wetlands across the site. The impacted wetlands are located within a contiguous grassland landscape and are, on average, no more than 1,500 feet south of the Proposed Wetland Preserve, where mitigation wetlands would be created among approximately 45 acres of existing wetlands. The creation of wetlands associated with the project is not expected to cause an overall increase in the current level of bird or other wildlife activity at the project site, because most of the wetlands being filled within the parcel would be replaced at a 1:1 ratio and would be located among existing wetland features that dominate the northern portion of the project site.

In summary, the construction and development associated with the Giovannoni Logistics Center would not cause an increase above the existing level of activity of birds or other wildlife. Therefore, the project land uses would not present a hazard to Napa County Airport flight operations. It is predicted that the overall wildlife activity on the property would remain at or below current levels, based on our understanding of the planned development and our best professional assessment of the existing habitat.

E. The project’s quality and character are compatible with the surrounding area, unless physically deteriorated or blighted, and will not be materially detrimental to existing development.

The project is compatible with the quality and character of the surrounding area because it maintains sufficient setbacks and has landscaped parking areas and perimeters. Additionally, the building is detailed with appropriate windows, doors, awnings, and a roofline with a parapet to screen roof level installations. The white and gray colors and sequential scoring match the adjacent warehouse buildings to the west and east of the site.

F. The proposed design is compatible with existing development in the area in terms of scale, height, bulk, proportion, materials, cohesiveness, and color, and the preservation of privacy. 3906
The project is compatible with existing development in the area as adjacent planned buildings are a similar scale and height. The building is setback from Devlin Road and Green Island Road and screened with landscaping that is native or adapted to the region. The design, exterior materials, and colors are industrial in character, but fit with the palette of other newly-constructed industrial buildings.

G. The design improves the community’s appearance by avoiding both excessive variety and monotonous repetition.

The project avoids monotonous repetition with architectural features around entrances and building corners, variation in elevation treatment, and a range of compatible colors on the exterior walls.

The grey trim differentiatesthis building from its neighbors. The site also has many landscaped areas which create separation and interest in the design.

H. The proposed design promotes a harmonious transition in terms of scale and character between areas of different general plan land use designations and zoning districts.

The project consists of two one-story distribution facilities. The perimeter landscaping consists of numerous deciduous and evergreen trees that complement the surroundings. The project buildings will be painted gray and white. The buildings will also be scored and the offices will have soft corners with transparent glass walls to reduce monotony.

I. The proposed design provides for adequate and safe on-site vehicular and pedestrian circulation.

Each building will have two driveway access points to the adjacent street. Entry points for each building provide good sight lines. The parking lot provides accessible parking, electric vehicle parking, and striped pedestrian pathways. The site will also provide sidewalks for the street and building entries. The site has adequate parking lot lighting that illuminates at night without producing glare onto neighboring parcels. The site will safely accommodate vehicular and pedestrian movements related to this industrial project.

SECTION 2: Conditions of Approval
General

1. The Design Permit approval is granted for two high-cube warehouse buildings within the Project totaling 1,069,904 square feet on a 70.2-acre site east of Devlin Road and north of Green Island Road.

Building A, located at 300 Green Island Road is proposed to be 627,976 square feet; and Building B, located at 1200 Devlin Road is proposed to be 469,512 square feet. (APN 057-360-007) as shown on Exhibit A. Exhibit A includes the following:
a. Architectural Plans prepared by RMW Architecture, dated 11-11-2020 consisting of 12 sheets, including Photometric Renderings, Preliminary Site Plan, Roof Plan Floor Plan, and Elevations b. Civil Plans prepared by CBG Engineers, dated 09-17-21 consisting of 6 sheets, Tentative Map, Existing Site Conditions, Preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan, Preliminary Utility Plan, Preliminary Stormwater Control Plan, and Preliminary Fire Access Plan. c. Preliminary Planting Plan prepared by RMW Architecture, dated 11-11-2020 consisting of 1 sheet. d. Photometric Plans prepared by Cal Lighting, dated 11-13-2020 consisting of 4 sheets, showing proposed lighting and site photometric plan.

2. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of American Canyon ("City"), its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, attorneys, representatives, boards, commissions, consultants, volunteers and agents from and against all claims, actions, including actions to arbitrate 3907
or mediate, damages, losses, judgments, liabilities, expenses and other costs, or proceedings against the City, its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, attorneys, representatives, boards, commissions, volunteers, or agents to attack, modify, set aside, void, or annul an approval, conditional approval, permit, entitlement, environmental document, environmental clearance, mitigation plan, or any other document or any of the proceedings, acts, or determinations taken, done, or made prior to granting of such approval, conditional approval, permit, entitlement, environmental clearance, environmental document, mitigation plan, or other documents, by the City, including, without limitation, an action against an advisory agency, appeal board, or legislative body within the applicable limitation period.

The obligation to defend, indemnify and hold the City harmless shall include the payment of all legal costs and attorney’s fees (including a third party award of attorney’s fees), arising out of, resulting from, or in connection with the City’s act or acts leading up to and including approval of any environmental document or mitigation plan granting approvals to the applicant, incurred on behalf of, or by, the City, its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, representatives, attorneys, boards, commissions, volunteers and agents in connection with the defense of any claim, action, or proceeding challenging the entire or a portion of an approval, conditional approval, permit, entitlement or any other document of any related claim.

The City will promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding, or the City fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the applicant shall not be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City.

In the event a legal challenge to a City permit, approval, conditional approval, environmental document, environmental clearance, mitigation plan, entitlement or any other document, proceeding, determination, or action related to the applicant’s project is successful, and an award of attorneys’ fees is granted against the City, the applicant shall be responsible to timely pay the full amount of such an award.

3. The applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or the revocation of the approval of this application.

4. The date upon which the approval is final shall be considered the day of the imposition of the fees, dedications, reservations and exactions required by these conditions approval for the purposes of protesting the imposition pursuant to California Government Code Section 66020.

5. The application shall not be deemed final until the applicant and property owner(s) execute and return the “Confirmation of Conditions of Approval” form as shown as Exhibit B to this Resolution.

6. Expiration of this Approval. In accordance with American Canyon Municipal Code (ACMC) Section

19.41.060 the approval shall become null and void and of no effect if no construction permits have been issued and construction commenced within two years of the date upon which this approval is final.
3908
This provision shall not apply to applications approved in conjunction with another discretionary permit. In these cases, the expiration period shall coincide with that of the associated period.

An extension of time may be granted by the Community Development Director upon the written request by a responsible party before the expiration of the two-year period, provided that the Director can make the findings that there have been no substantial changes in the approved plans, and that there has been no change of circumstances which would prevent any of the required findings of approval to be made.

Planning

7. All plans submitted for review and approval and all development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved exhibits, except where modified by a condition of approval. The Community Development Director or designee may approve minor changes to the project as approved by the City Council on the plans submitted for the construction permits with a determination that the changes are in substantial compliance with the representation of the project as reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council, that the proposed change will be in compliance with the required development standards, and the change will not materially affect adjacent private or public property.

8. The conditions of this Permit shall be printed on the first sheet of each plan set submitted for a building permit pursuant to this Design Permit, under the title ‘Design Permit Conditions’. The second sheet may also be used if the first sheet is not of sufficient size to list all of the conditions. The sheet(s) containing the conditions shall be of the same size as those sheets containing the construction drawings; 8-1/2” by 11” sheets are not acceptable.

9. Plans submitted for building permits shall include all exterior site lighting including building mounted lighting, lighting within the parking areas and along walkways that provide a minimum of 1-foot candle illumination of these areas. Lighting shall be shielded as appropriate and avoid light spillage or glare from the project site. Exterior light fixtures on buildings shall be oriented downward and shall be shielded to return potential light and glare impacts.

10. All new roof top equipment is required to be screened with a parapet equal or taller than the mechanical equipment. Alternative methods and materials for screening will be subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Director.

11. This permit does not include approval for signs. The applicant shall obtain a separate sign permit prior to installation of any sign. The signs shall be subject to ACMC Section 19.23.

12. Prior to building permit issuance, the applicant shall submit final landscape plans that comply with the State of California Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. The landscape architect shall document and attest to the compliance with the State ordinance on the landscape plans. The plans shall incorporate the following requirements:
a. All trees must be 15 gallons in size or larger.
b. Provide cross sections for the north and south landscaping areas showing trees, landscaping, etc. that ensure that proposed trees would not be planted above proposed utilities or inappropriately planted in bio-retention areas. Ensure the landscape plans are reconciled with the civil plans and continue to provide a robust tree palette.
3909

13. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the project landscape architect shall certify that all plant materials have been installed in accordance with the approved landscape plan.

14. All tree stakes and ties shall be removed within one year following installation or as soon as trees are able to stand erect without support.

15. Clear sight triangles shall be maintained at all driveways. Low-lying plantings and other site fixtures, including signs, shall be no taller than 30 inches within the site vision triangles.

16. All planting shall be maintained in good growing condition. Such maintenance shall include, where appropriate, pruning, mowing, weeding, cleaning of debris and trash, fertilizing, and regular watering.

Whenever necessary, planting shall be replaced with other plant materials to ensure continued compliance with applicable landscaping requirements. Required irrigation systems shall be fully maintained in sound operating condition with heads periodically cleaned and replaced when missing to insure continued regular watering of landscape areas, and health and vitality of landscape materials.

Building and Safety

17. Construction and grading activities on the site shall be limited to between 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m.

Monday through Friday. Work between the hours of 6:00 pm and 7:00 am and work on weekends and holidays requires prior written approval from the Building Official. If weekends and holiday work is approved construction and grading activities on the site shall be limited to between 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Saturdays, and between 10:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on Sundays and State and Federal holidays.

18. All construction plans and buildings onsite shall conform to the California Code of Regulations, Title

24. All building plans shall include all necessary recommendations from the Geotechnical Report for the site, to be superseded only by the California Code if any conflicts arise.

19. According to CBC 11B-228.3.2.1, provide the applicable amount of electrical vehicle charging stations (EVCS) and van accessible EVCS spaces for the employee parking lot.

20. Prior to the final inspection, the applicant shall submit a letter of certification to the Building Official from the project architect, civil engineer, and landscape architect certifying that all improvements have been constructed in accordance with the approved building plans. A Certified Access Specialist (CASP) shall also submit a letter certifying that all improvements have been constructed in compliance with applicable state and federal accessibility standards. Determination of consistency shall be subject to the review and approval of the Building Official.

21. Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling: Prior to issuance of a building permit the applicant shall submit a Construction Waste Management (CWM) plan for the diversion of at least 70 percent of the debris from the building demolition and construction. The plan shall include the qualified recycler that will be used, the methods of managing diversion of construction materials on site, and the proposed documentation that will be submitted to confirm that the diversion goal has been met.

Fire Protection
The following Fire Protection conditions shall be satisfactorily addressed on the building permit submittal:

22. Prior to City issuance of the first building permit, in accordance with ACFPD Agreement 2022-29, the Applicant shall form a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District or similar public financing mechanism 3910
(CFD) on full legal parcels that are a part of the Project. A copy of Agreement 2022-29 is included with this Resolution as Exhibit C.

23. In accordance with the standard mitigation measures and conditions of approval set forth by the City of American Canyon, the developer shall pay the Fire Impact Fees (see current Standard Fees and Charges adopted by resolution), prior to the issuance of any building permits.

24. New buildings and additions to existing buildings shall conform to requirements set forth in the currently adopted editions of the California Building Code, California Fire Code, City of American Canyon standards and Nationally Recognized Standards.

25. There shall be no deferred submittals for fire protection equipment and related utilities. Fire protection plans shall not be attached to or bound with the building plan submittal package. This includes but is not limited to Automatic Fire Sprinkler, Fire Alarm, Fixed Fire Protection, and Civil plans.

26. All Fire-related underground piping and fire appurtenances shall be shown on the Civil plan submittal.

In addition to the Civil plan submittal, at least one (1) plan set under separate cover shall be submitted to American Canyon Building Division for routing to the American Canyon Fire Protection District detailing all underground piping and related fire appurtenances including but not limited to underground piping, underground sweep detail, underground trench details showing depth of burial, type of backfill, manufacturer’s specifications of piping, valves joints, fittings and calculated size and locations of thrust blocks, hydrants locations (designate public or private), gate shut-off valves, PIV’s, FDC’s, fire pumps, fire pump and/or riser rooms. The applicant will need to submit all related Fire information on a separate plan for Fire review. The Fire-related portions of the civil plan shall not be bound with the building plan.

27. Underground utility contractor, architect and fire sprinkler contractor shall coordinate the location of risers and control valves prior to the issuance of a building permit.

28. An approved water supply capable of supplying the required fire flow for fire protection systems shall be provided to all premises upon which facilities or buildings are hereby constructed or moved into or within the City. Required fire flow and hydrant distribution shall be in accordance with Appendix B and C of the California Fire Code. Applicant shall demonstrate on plan submittal; square footage of each building on plan and provide the required fire flow information. Applicant shall demonstrate that the number and spacing of onsite fire hydrants meets with requirements of the California Fire Code.

See sample below regarding fire flow and hydrant detail information needed.

BUILDING FIRE FLOW REQUIREMENTS – CFC TABLES B105.2 & B105.1(2)

INFORMATION BELOW IS A SAMPLE AND FOR REFERENCE ONLY
Table B105.1(2) – Building size = 129, 600 square feet
Construction type = Type IIA
FF = 5,250 gpm at 20 psi
Duration = 4 hours
Table B105.2 – Fire sprinkler allowance = - 50%
5,250 – 2,625 = 2,625 gpm
FF = 2,625 gpm @ 20 psi
3911
Duration = 2 hours
Table CC105.1 – Approximate number of hydrants = 3
Average spacing = 400 feet + 25% allowable increase = 500 Maximum distance from street or frontage = 225 feet = 50% allowable increase = 337.5

29. The fire protection equipment shall be located within an interior room having an approved exterior access door or in an exterior enclosure attached to the building, specifically, for the purpose of housing such equipment.

30. Prior to building permit issuance, provide a fire department circulation plan using the City’s ladder truck and demonstrate clear turning movements into and out of the project. The final design of fire department access components shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Marshal prior to installation. Please show how fire apparatus can position near the building on either side, with the ability to turn the apparatus around to leave the project site.

31. Fire Apparatus Access Roads shall be designed in accordance with provisions set forth in the California Fire Code Chapter 5 and Appendix D as amended by the City of American Canyon and the applicable Public Works Standard.

32. Fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed minimum width of 20 feet (curb to curb) and a minimum unobstructed vertical clearance of 13’ 6”. They shall have an all-weather paved surface capable of supporting a GVW of 71,000 pounds.

33. Access roads shall be completed with all-weather surfaces prior to the stockpiling of combustible materials or beginning combustible construction. Fire apparatus access shall be provided to within 150 feet of the most remote portions of all building from an approved exterior route. If this cannot be achieved fire apparatus turn-arounds will be needed.

34. Fire apparatus access roads shall not be obstructed in any manner, including the parking of vehicles.

Vertical traffic calming in the form of speed pumps, humps or dips are prohibited along fire access roads without prior approval of the fire Code Official. The minimum width and clearances established in Section 503.2.1 shall be maintained at all times.

35. When required by the Fire Chief, fire apparatus access roads shall be designated as Fire Lanes and appropriate signs and/or markings installed in accordance with the California Vehicle Code and approved City standards.

36. Where applicable, improvement plan submittals for permit shall include locations of fire lane red curbing and fire lane signage. Please refer to and include City Public Works Standard FP-2A & 2B with plan submittals for permitting.

37. The City of American Canyon requires that a fire hydrant be in service within 250 feet of the furthest point of construction prior to the stockpiling of combustible materials for the beginning of construction.

38. Fire Department Connections (FDC) shall be located not more than 100 ft. from the nearest fire hydrant.
3912

39. Improvement Plans submitted for permit shall include City of American Canyon “Underground” standards, detail drawings and the applicable City of American Canyon Public Works Standard detail (W-7A, B, C or D) for Fire Service double detector check installations. Also, a separate set of plans shall be submitted detailing all related underground Fire utilities and appurtenances including but not limited to; All underground piping, type, sizes, depth of burial, fittings, thrust blocks, risers, pumps, hydrants, FDC’s, etc.

40. System Protection Area Limitations NFPA 13 – 8.2.1 Maximum floor area on any one floor to be protected by sprinklers supplied by any one sprinkler system riser or combined system riser shall be as follows:

1. Light Hazard – 52,000 sf – per riser

2. Ordinary Hazard - 52,000 sf – per riser

3. *Extra Hazard – Hydraulically calculated - 40,000 sf – per riser

4. Storage – High-piled storage (as defined in 3.9.1.16) and storage covered by other NFPA standards – 40,000 sf – per riser
Public Works
General Conditions of Approval

41. The Applicant shall be responsible for all City plan check and inspection costs. The Applicant shall establish a Developer Deposit Account with the City upon the initiation of plan check services. The amount of the initial deposit shall be determined by the City Engineer. Additional funds may be required based upon actual costs.

42. All improvements shall be designed in accordance with the American Canyon Municipal Code (ACMC), City of American Canyon Engineering Standard Plans and Specifications for Public Improvements (City Standards), except as specifically noted otherwise in these conditions.

43. All new utilities to serve the project, shall be placed underground. Exceptions may be allowed for surface-mounted transformers, pedestal mounted terminal boxes, and meter cabinets.

44. Unless otherwise explicitly permitted, all existing wells, septic tanks, and/or underground fuel storage tanks shall be abandoned under permit and inspection of Napa County Department of Environmental Services or other designated agency. If there are none, the project engineer shall provide a letter describing the scope of the search done to make this determination.

45. A detailed Soils Investigation/Geotechnical Report shall be prepared and submitted for review. The report shall address, at a minimum, potential for liquefaction, R-values, expansive soils, and seismic risk. The improvement plans shall incorporate all design and construction criteria recommended in the Geotechnical Report.

46. A drainage report prepared by a California Registered Civil Engineer shall be submitted for review with the initial submittal of the Improvement Plans. The report shall include detailed hydrologic and hydraulic calculations to support the design and sizing of all public and private drainage facilities including storm drains and detention facilities. The report shall address existing downstream storm drain facilities and hydraulic conditions which may impact the design of proposed facilities and improvements.
3913

47. A final detailed post-construction Stormwater Control Plan (SWCP) that identifies and sizes all permanent post-construction stormwater treatment BMPs shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval. The SCWP shall be prepared in accordance with the latest edition of the Bay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association (BASMAA) Post-Construction Manual and the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Phase II Municipal Separate Storm Water System (MS4) General Permit (Order 2013-0001 DWQ). It is the City’s discretion whether to accept alternative treatment facilities other than bioretention.

48. A Post Construction Stormwater Operations and Maintenance Plan that includes a plan sheet showing all storm drain and water quality infrastructure that is to be maintained, along with detailed instructions and schedules for the ongoing maintenance and operation of all post-construction stormwater BMPs shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer. Once approved, the property owner(s) shall enter into an agreement with the City that provides the terms, conditions, and security associated with the ongoing requirements of the post-construction Stormwater Best Management Practices.

49. The Applicant shall secure all necessary rights-of-way and public and private easements for both onsite and offsite improvements. The applicant shall prepare all necessary legal descriptions and deeds.

50. To the extent any offsite public improvements require the acquisition of property not currently owned by the Applicant or the City, the Applicant shall first make a good-faith effort to acquire the necessary property rights, however if the Applicant makes such an effort and is unable to acquire such rights, then the Applicant may request the City acquire the necessary property rights through the exercise of eminent domain provided that the Applicant enters first into an agreement with the City to pay for all costs incurred by the City to acquire such rights and if the City does not acquire the rights necessary to allow the offsite public improvements to be completed by the Applicant within statutory timeline provided by law, then the Applicant shall be relieved of the obligation to construct those off-site improvements only to the extent they require property not currently owned by the Applicant or the City. The Applicant shall make a good-faith effort to identify and acquire the necessary property rights at the earliest opportunity.

51. The Applicant shall submit site Improvement Plans, prepared by a registered Civil Engineer, for review and approval of the City’s Public Works Department. Please be aware that this is separate submittal from the building permit application. The final plan set shall include all civil, landscape and joint trench drawings under a single cover sheet. No final grading or other construction shall be performed until the Improvement Plans have been approved. The Applicant shall not begin clearing, grubbing, or rough grading at the site prior to approval of the Improvement Plans, unless explicitly approved by the City of American Canyon through the standard grading and utilities only permit process. An Encroachment Permit is required for any work within City right of way. Encroachment Permits will not be issued prior to the approval of the Improvement Plans.

52. All public water service laterals or services (domestic, recycled and fire water) shall include approved backflow prevention devices.

53. Cathodic protection shall be provided for all water valves, fittings, hydrants, meters, backflow devices and other metal appurtenances, regardless of the findings of any soils corrosivity analysis. 3914

54. The Applicant shall keep adjoining public and private streets free and clean of project dirt, mud, materials, and debris during the construction period in accordance with SWPPP using appropriate BMPs and as is found necessary by the City Engineer.

55. If any hazardous material is encountered during the construction of this project, all work shall be immediately stopped and the Fire Department, Napa County Department of Environmental Services or other designated agency, and the City Inspector shall be notified immediately. Work shall not proceed until clearance has been issued by all of these agencies.

56. Prior to final preparation of the subgrade and placement of base materials, all underground utilities shall be installed, and service connections stubbed out behind the sidewalk. Public utilities, Cable TV, sanitary sewers, and water lines shall be installed in a manner that will not disturb the street pavement, curb, gutter and sidewalk, when future service connections or extensions are made.

57. Where soil or geologic conditions encountered in grading operations are different from that anticipated in the soil and/or geologic investigation report, or where such conditions warrant changes to the recommendations contained in the original soil investigation, a revised soil or geologic report shall be submitted for approval by the City Engineer. Additionally, if field conditions warrant installation of any subdrains, the location, size and construction details must be provided to the City for review and approval prior to construction.

58. All new fire hydrants shall be covered with burlap sacks until the hydrants have been tested and found to be in conformance with City flow requirements. No storage of combustible materials or construction of building shall be permitted until all hydrants meet City flow requirements.

59. Prior to placing the final lift of asphalt, all public storm drains and sanitary sewer lines shall be video inspected at the Applicant's expense. All video media (CD, DVD, or portable hard drive) shall be submitted to the City. If any inadequacies are found, they shall be repaired prior to the placement of the final lift of asphalt.

60. All streets, curbs, gutters, sidewalks or other public facilities damaged in the course of construction associated with this Project shall be the responsibility of the Applicant and shall be repaired to the satisfaction of the City at the Applicant's expense.

61. After all of the new underground utilities within existing public streets have been installed, the entire affected areas shall be milled and repaved to present a neat finished pavement area. Multiple trench patches are not acceptable.

62. All construction stormwater pollution prevention best management practices (BMP's) shall be installed as the first order of work and in accordance with the State Water Resources Control Board's General Construction Permit for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Construction and Land Disturbance Activities (Order 2009-0009-DWQ, as amended), the Applicant's Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), and the City’s Erosion and Sediment control Plan in accordance with the City’s MS4 Permit. All stormwater BMP's shall be maintained to the satisfaction of the Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD), Qualified SWPPP Practitioner (QSP), and the City Engineer.

63. With the exception of water used for loading and testing of potable water lines, all construction water used for the project shall be obtained from a source other than American Canyon potable water sources. The Applicant shall provide verification that an outside source of construction water, e.g., recycled water, has been established and will be available for the duration of the project construction. 3915

64. The development shall comply with the City’s Zero Water Footprint policy.

65. All landscaping shall be designed to use recycled water for irrigation. Recycled water landscaping shall be designed to comply with California Code of Regulations Title 22 and shall include design details to prevent runoff of recycled water. The irrigation system shall include an ET/SMART controller.

66. All buildings shall be dual plumbed to use recycled water for non-potable uses.

Public Works Special Conditions of Approval

67. The Applicant shall submit Improvement Plans prepared by a registered Civil Engineer (Engineer of Record) in substantial conformance with the preliminary civil plans titled “Giovannoni Logistics Center East Tentative Parcel Map” prepared by CBG Civil Engineers dated September 17, 2021, except as modified by these conditions.

68. Improvement Plans and Final Map shall be tied to the State of California coordinate system.

69. The Applicant shall construct all of the on-site private streets, water, recycled water, sewer, storm drainage and storm quality “Private Improvements” generally shown on the Preliminary Plans and more specifically described below. All private street, water, recycled watersewer, storm drainage and stormwater quality improvements shall be designed in accordance with the City of American Canyon Engineering Standard Plans and Specifications for Public Improvements (City Standards), except as specifically noted otherwise in these conditions.
a. Storm Drain Facilities:

Construct private on-site drainage facilities, detention facilities, and other appurtenances to collect and convey all surface drainage to an approved private storm drain facility or outfall.

Onsite drainage facilities shall provide for the positive drainage of all adjacent upstream or upgrade properties to prevent ponding. Existing run-on from adjacent properties shall not be obstructed and shall be conveyed onsite. Off-site peak storm water discharge shall not exceed 90% of the undeveloped peak flow from the 24-hour, 100-year event. The storm drains and detention facilities shall be substantially consistent with the Preliminary Plans. However, the sizing of all storm drains and detention facilities shall be determined by the approved final drainage report.
b. Stormwater Quality Facilities:

Permanent on-site private post-construction stormwater treatment BMPs shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the approved final SWCP. c. Recycled Water Services:

Separate recycled water services shall be provided for domestic non-potable uses and irrigation uses.

70. Per the Subdivision Improvement and Reimbursement Agreement between the City of American Canyon and DWF IV NLP II, LLC, Napa County Official Record 2018-0024204, the Applicant shall reimburse the City its fair share cost for the improvement of South Kelly Road from its intersection with Devlin Road up to intersection with Highway 29. The fair share cost is based on the project’s proportional share of net new trips.

71. Per the Subdivision Improvement and Reimbursement Agreement between the City of American Canyon and DWF IV NLP II, LLC, Napa County Official Record 2018-0024204, the Applicant shall reimburse the City its fair share cost for the construction of the Permanent Sewer Solution, which 3916
consists of new offsite public gravity sewer, pump station and force main which replaced the existing Green Island Pump Station. The fair share cost is based on the project’s sewer flow.

72. Prior to SUBMITTAL OF THE IMPROVEMENT PLANS, the Applicant shall:
a. Submit the City's "Improvement Plan Checklist".
b. Pay an initial cash deposit for City plan check services in amount to be determined by the City prior to the time of submittal. The Project engineer shall contact City staff to discuss submittal details to determine initial deposit amount.
c. Provide the following:
(1) Public Street Repair Plan
(2) Utility Plan and Joint Trench Plan
(3) Construction Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and a City Erosion and Sediment Control Plan
(4) Drainage Report
(5) Post-Construction Stormwater Control Plan (SWCP)
(6) Geotechnical Report
(7) Construction Traffic Control Plan.
(8) Traffic Impact Study
(9) Application for Water and Sewer Service

73. Pothole and physically determine (by way of a survey performed by the Engineer of record) the actual horizontal location and vertical depth of all existing underground utilities throughout the proposed area of work and provide the design of all new utility installations required to serve the project including a schedule for implementation of such work as to prevent disrupting of utility service to adjacent properties.

74. Prior to APPROVAL OF THE IMPROVEMENT PLANS, the Applicant shall:
a. Merge the two existing parcels (APNs 057-130-034 and 057-130-036) into a single parcel through the recordation of a lot merger or lot line adjustment. b. Provide written acknowledgment by the Geotechnical Engineer of Record that the Plans incorporate all design and construction criteria specified in the Geotechnical Report. c. Furnish proof of the acquisition of all rights of entry and/or temporary and permanent easements necessary to construct the project and the location of all such rights on the Plans. d. Furnish proof that all permits that may be required by the California Department of Fish & Wildlife, State and Regional Water Quality Control Board, US Army Corps of Engineers and any other regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over the proposed construction have been obtained. e. Fill out and submit the City’s Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (ESCP) Template. Applicant may refer to a SWPPP, as appropriate, by referencing page number within the SWPPP that addresses the requirements of the ESCP.
f. Submit a copy of the Notice of Intent and Wastewater Discharge Identification Number (WDID#) for coverage under the State Water Resources Control Board's General Construction Permit for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Construction and Land Disturbance Activities (Order 2009-0009-DWQ).

75. Prior to COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, the Applicant shall:
3917
a. Pay off all current account balances with the City of American Canyon. b. Pay an inspection fee in amount to be determined at the time of commencement for the City's inspection of the Public Improvements.
c. Conduct a pre-construction meeting with representatives of the City whereby the Applicant, the Legally Responsible Party (LRP), Qualified SWPPP Practitioner (QSP), Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD), and/or the Contractor provides the following:
(1) Six (6) full-size bond copies of the approved Improvement Plans for the City's use. (2) One (1) job-site copy of the latest edition of the City Standards for the Contractor use. (3) One (1) job-site copy of the SWPPP for use by the LRP, QSP, QSD, and Contractor. (4) Electronic copies of Improvement Plans and SWPPP.

76. Prior to APPROVAL OF A BUILDING PERMIT, the Applicant shall:

Pay all account balances and current City and American Canyon Fire District fees (Mitigation & Capacity) based on the rates in effect at the time of permit issuance. These fees include but may not be limited to the following: Traffic Mitigation, General Plan Update, Civic Facilities, Fire District, Water Capacity, Wastewater Capacity, Zero Water Footprint Mitigation, and Affordable Housing Nexus.

77. A. Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the Applicant shall enter into a Recorded a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Program Agreement (“TDM Agreement”) that ensures the cumulative Project trip generation does not exceed the Giovannoni Logistics Center Final EIR (SCH# 2021010104) Trip Generation assumptions. The TDM Agreement shall encompass the entire Giovannoni Logistics Center Project.

B. The TDM Agreement shall include a financial guarantee satisfactory to the City. The City shall deem the TDM program to be effective if the monitoring results indicate that AM peak-hour volumes are no more than 240 vehicles and PM peak-hour volumes are no more than 264 vehicles.

C. The TDM program shall be implemented at the applicant’s cost, with no cost to the City, regardless of the eventual mix of uses and shall at a minimum include a permanent vehicle counting station at the single public access point. Examples of measures that may be considered as part of an effective TDM program include but are not limited to the following:
• Starting and ending workday shifts during off-peak hours (i.e., not between 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. or 3:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.).
• Implement shuttle service to key employment centers or park-and-ride lots in the area for those employees whose workday shift start during peak hours. • Car-share program
• Shuttles to regional transit
• Transit subsidies
• Carpool/vanpool subsidies
• Employer-owned/sponsored vanpools
• Flex-time and telecommute programs
• Use of rail to transport employees and/or the delivery of goods D. The Applicant shall retain a transportation planning/ engineering consultant to analyze the effectiveness of the TDM program in a written report. The TDM Report will include data collected from the permanent vehicle counting station and a determination of employee commute methods, which shall be informed by surveying all employees working at the site. The TDM Report shall be 3918
submitted to the City on a periodic on-going basis and it shall form the basis of on-going determinations by the City as to the effectiveness of the TDM program. So long as the City deems the TDM program effective (i.e. when monitoring results indicate that AM peak-hour volumes are no more than 240 vehicles and PM peak-hour volumes are no more than 264 vehicles). At any time the City determines the Project exceeds the Giovannoni Logistics Center Final EIR (SCH# 2021010104) Trip Generation assumptions, the additional traffic impact shall be mitigated by Paragraph B.

E. If at any point the City determines the TDM program established as part of Paragraph A through D is not effective to reduce peak-hour traffic to within the TDM thresholds (240 vehicles during the AM peak hour and 264 vehicles during the PM peak hour), the Applicant shall pay an additional amount for each and every peak-hour trip that is recorded by the counting device that exceeds the TDM threshold, equal to the latest adopted Traffic Impact Fee (“TIF”) program in effect at the time. The “on-going TIF” paid pursuant to this condition of approval is in addition to the “one-time TIF” paid at the time of issuance of the first building permit.

78. Prior to OCCUPANCY OF THE BUILDING, the Applicant shall:
a. Restore all adjacent off-site road surfaces to pre-project conditions. b. Submit a certification by the Geotechnical Engineer of Record that all the work has been completed in substantial conformance with the recommendations in Soils Investigation/Geotechnical Report.
c. Provide a mylar and digital copy of the Improvement Plans that include all as-built or field changes, in digital (.pdf) and AutoCAD (.dwg) format, compatible with the City's current version, and tied to the City's coordinate system.
d. Provide a letter stating that all of the Developer’s Conditions of Approval have been met. e. Provide a letter from the Civil Engineer of Record certifying that all the site improvements were constructed and inspected in substantial conformance with the approved plans and City Standards.
f. Enter and record a post-construction Stormwater Operations and Maintenance Agreement with the City.

Mitigation Measures

79. MM AES-3: Prior to issuance of building permits for the proposed project, the project applicant shall prepare and submit a photometric plan to the City of American Canyon for review and approval which demonstrates that all exterior light fixtures would be directed downward or employ full cut-off fixtures to minimize light spillage and avoid interference with aviation operations at the Napa County Airport. The approved plan shall be incorporated into the proposed project.

80. MM AIR-2a: The following Best Management Practices (BMPs), as recommended by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD), shall be included in the design of the project and implemented during construction:
• All active construction areas shall be watered at least two times per day. • All exposed non-paved surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and access roads) shall be watered at least three times per day and/or non-toxic soil stabilizers shall be applied to exposed non-paved surfaces.
3919
• All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off-site shall be covered and/or shall maintain at least 2 feet of freeboard.
• All visible mud or dirt tracked out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited. • All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 miles per hour. All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. Building pads shall be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used. • Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to 5 minutes (as required by the California Airborne Toxics Control Measure (ATCM) Title 13, Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations). Clear signage regarding idling restrictions shall be provided for construction workers at all access points. • All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer’s specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified mechanic and determined to be running in proper condition prior to operation. • The prime construction contractor shall post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact regarding dust complaints. The City and the construction contractor shall take corrective action within 48 hours. The BAAQMD’s phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations.

81. MM AIR-2b: Prior to the issuance of grading or building permits, the project applicant shall provide the City with documentation demonstrating the use of “Low-VOC” architectural coatings during the proposed project's construction. “Low-VOC” architectural coatings used during project construction shall not exceed 50 grams of reactive organic gases (ROG) or volatile organic compounds (VOC) per liter of product.

82. MM AIR-2c: Prior to issuing any certificate of occupancy for the proposed project, the project applicant shall provide the City with documentation demonstrating the use of “Low-VOC” architectural coatings and electric landscaping equipment during the operation of the proposed project. “Low-VOC” architectural coatings used during project operation shall not exceed 10 grams of reactive organic gases (ROG) or volatile organic compounds (VOC) per liter of product. Landscaping equipment referred to in this requirement shall include lawnmowers, leaf blowers, and chainsaws.

83. MM AIR-2d: Prior to issuing the certificate of occupancy for the proposed project, the project applicant shall provide the City with documentation demonstrating the use of a truck fleet that meets or exceeds model year 2014 for all heavy- duty trucks during operation of the proposed project. If the project applicant does not own the truck fleet that would be used during operation of the proposed project, the project applicant shall provide the City with documentation from the truck fleet owner or operator demonstrating that trucks utilized for operation of the proposed project will meet or exceed model year 2014. If any change occurs where a new truck fleet is utilized during operation of the proposed project, the project applicant shall provide the City with documentation demonstrating that the new truck fleet meets or exceeds this requirement.

Alternatively, the City may require periodic reporting and provision of written records by operators and conduct regular inspections of the records to the maximum extent feasible and practicable. 3920

84. MM AIR-2e: Prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy for each building with dock doors, signage shall be posted identifying idling restrictions and contact information to report violations to the building manager.

85. MM AIR-2f: Prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy for each building with a separate end user, the City shall confirm that the end user has prepared a Transportation Demand Management Plan (TDM Plan). The TDM Plan shall be prepared by a qualified transportation consultant and identify strategies to reduce single-occupant vehicle trips. Examples of TDM strategies may include but are not limited to:
• Ridesharing/Ride Matching
• Vanpools
• Transit subsidies
• Preferential parking for rideshare or vanpool vehicles • Employee lockers
• Secure bicycle parking
• Employee locker rooms
• Provide TDM information in employee breakroom

86. MM AIR-2g: Prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy, as a part of future lease agreements, the project proponent shall provide all future tenants at the project site information on available California Air Resources Board (ARB) and Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) incentive programs, such as the Carl Moyer Program and the Voucher Incentive Program, that support upgrading truck fleets to clean air technology equipment.

87. MM BIO-1a: Pre-construction surveys for Swainson’s hawk shall be conducted in the project site vicinity prior to initiation of project construction activities and each year following initiation of construction if project activities are delayed or discontinued for 7 or more days prior to the first required survey period (March 20 to April 5), and are scheduled to recommence construction activities during the second survey period but before August 1. These pre-construction surveys shall include investigation of all potential nesting trees within a half-mile radius around all project activities and shall be completed for at least two survey periods immediately prior to commencement of project construction. Surveys shall be conducted in accordance with CDFW’s “Recommended timing and methodology for Swainson’s Hawk Nesting Surveys in California’s Central Valley” (CDFW 2000) to maximize the potential for locating nesting Swainson’s hawk and reduce the potential for nest failures due to project activities and/or disturbances.

If no nesting Swainson’s hawk are found during the first or second required survey period starting March 20 and extending to April 20, then project construction may commence. If during the third surveys (June 10 to July 30) Swainson’s hawk are found to be nesting in the project vicinity and construction has commenced, it shall be assumed the Swainson’s hawk commenced nesting and thus the Swainson’s hawk are habituated to the ambient level of noise and disturbance emanating from the project site.

If Swainson’s hawk are found to be nesting within 0.25 mile of the project site, a non-disturbance buffer shall be established to keep all construction activities a minimum of 0.25 mile from the nest site. The CDFW shall be consulted regarding the adequacy of the buffer established by the qualified Raptor Biologist. At that time the necessity for acquiring a Fish and Game Section 2081 Incidental Take Permit (ITP) authorization would be determined. An ITP authorization shall be required if there were 3921
a valid concern the project activities would result in the “take” of an adult Swainson’s hawk, eggs, or nestlings.

88. Surveys shall be conducted by a qualified Raptor Biologist with at least a minimum of a 4- year college degree in wildlife biology or related environmental science, familiarity with Swainson’s hawk and its local ecology, and 2 years of experience surveying for and detecting Swainson’s hawk pursuant to “Recommended timing and methodology for Swainson’s Hawk Nesting Surveys in California’s Central Valley” survey protocol. No disturbance such as construction or earthmoving activity shall occur within the established buffer zone until it is determined by a qualified Raptor Biologist that the young have fledged or that the nesting cycle is complete based on monitoring of the active nest by a qualified Biologist.

89. MM BIO-1b: No more than 30 days prior to the first ground disturbance activity, pre-construction golden eagle nesting surveys shall be conducted in the project vicinity by a qualified Raptor Biologist.

The qualified Raptor Biologist shall have a minimum of a 4- year college degree in wildlife biology or related environmental science, and at least 2 years of experience surveying for and detecting nesting golden eagles and its local ecology. Preconstruction surveys shall include investigation of all potential nesting trees within a survey area determined by the qualified Raptor Biologist, but no less than a 0.5- mile radius around all project activities. If active golden eagle nests are identified within any trees within the survey areas a 1.0-mile radius of the project site, a qualified Raptor Biologist shall establish a protection buffer of approximately 1.0 mile that is adequate to ensure noise or activity from the proposed project would not cause nest disturbance of young or adult bird mortality. Buffer zones may vary in size as some golden eagles are more acclimated to disturbance than others. Size of buffer zone may be modified by the qualified Raptor Biologist considering the type of construction activity that may occur and the behavioral factors and extent that golden eagle may have acclimated to disturbance. No construction or earthmoving activity shall occur within the established buffer zone until it is determined by a qualified Raptor Biologist that the young golden eagles have fledged or that the nesting cycle is complete based on monitoring of the active nest by a qualified Biologist.

90. MM BIO-1c: Prior to ground disturbance, a pre-construction nesting survey shall be conducted for northern harrier and short-eared owl by a qualified Raptor Biologist if construction is scheduled during the nesting season (February 1 through September 1). The qualified Raptor Biologist shall have at least 2 years of experience surveying for and detecting nesting northern harrier and short-eared owl. To determine whether northern harrier or short-eared owl is nesting on-site, a qualified Raptor Biologist(s) shall conduct walking transects through the project site grassland habitat searching for nests and minimum 500-foot radius from the project site. Where the survey area encroaches onto private property not accessible to the public (e.g., fenced in commercial property, residential backyard, etc., the qualified Biologist shall either contact the property owner for permission to physically access the property or conduct a visual survey of adjacent areas by scanning with binoculars or a spotting scope. An active northern harrier or short-eared owl nest must be protected by implementing a minimum 500-foot radius buffer zone around the nest marked with orange construction fencing. If an active nest is located outside of the project site, the buffer shall be extended onto the project site and demarcated where it intersects the project site. Size of buffer zone could be modified increased considering the type of construction activity that may occur, physical barriers between the construction site and active nest, and the behavioral factors and extent that northern harrier or short-eared owl may have acclimated to disturbance. No construction or earthmoving activity shall occur within the established buffer zone until it is determined by a qualified Raptor Biologist that the young have fledged or that the nesting cycle is otherwise determined to be complete based on monitoring of the active nest by a qualified Raptor Biologist. 3922

91. MM BIO-1d: Prior to any ground disturbance, pre- construction surveys for burrowing owl shall be conducted within a minimum of 150 meters of the project site. Where the survey area encroaches onto private property not accessible to the public (e.g., fenced in commercial property, residential backyard, etc.), the qualified Biologist shall either contact the property owner for permission to physically access the property or conduct a visual survey of adjacent areas by scanning with binoculars or a spotting scope. The pre- construction surveys shall be conducted within 2 weeks prior to the onset of any ground-disturbing activities. Surveys shall be conducted by a qualified Biologist following California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) 2012 staff report survey methods and Biologist qualifications to establish the status of burrowing owl on the project site. a. If burrowing owl are found to occupy the project site during the nonbreeding season (September 1 to January 31), occupied burrows shall be avoided by establishing a no- disturbance buffer zone a minimum of 100 feet around the burrow. Buffers may be adjusted to address site-specific conditions using the impact assessment approach described in the CDFW 2012 staff report. If a qualified Raptor Biologist determines the location of an occupied burrow/s may be impacted even with a 100-foot buffer, or the burrow(s) are in a location(s) on the project site where a buffer cannot be established without preventing the proposed project from moving forward, then a passive relocation effort may be instituted to relocate the individual(s) out of harm’s way pursuant to a Burrowing Owl Exclusion Plan prepared in accordance with the CDFW 2012 staff report.
b. If burrowing owl are found to be present during the breeding season (February 1 to August 31), the proposed project ground-disturbing activities shall follow the CDFW 2012 staff report recommended avoidance protocol whereby occupied burrows shall be avoided with a nodisturbance buffer. c. If burrowing owls are ultimately found on the site and burrow eviction/ relocation of burrowing owls during the non-nesting season is a selected strategy to move forward with the project without direct impacts to burrowing owl individuals, the applicant shall coordinate this effort with CDFW and provide habitat mitigation consistent with the 2012 CDFW Staff Report on burrowing owl.

92. MM BIO-2: Prior to issuance of grading permits. To offset the loss of the 0.496 acre of seasonal wetland impacts from Phase 1, and 2.57 acres of seasonal wetlands and 1.13 acres of vernal pools from Phase 2, and to ensure there is no-net loss of wetland area, the applicant shall establish/create

0.992 acre of palustrine emergent wetlands (2:1 ratio) for Phase 1 concurrent with project construction, and 2.57 acres of seasonal wetlands (1:1 ratio) and 1.13 acres of vernal pool wetlands (1:1 ratio) for Phase 2 at least 1 year prior to the start of Phase 2 construction, on the 45-acre Wetland Preserve. The established/created wetlands will be constructed a minimum of 20-feet from the Napa Logistics Park sewer and recycled water pipeline easement or unpaved access road associated with the easement. The established/created wetlands shall be monitored for a minimum of 5 years to ensure the wetlands meet the USACE’s and RWQCB’s definition of a wetland.

93. MM BIO-3a: Prior to issuance of the Phase 1 grading permit, the project applicant shall apply for and obtain a Nationwide Permit from the San Francisco District of the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) for discharge within 0.004 acre of wetlands/waters of the United States under Clean Water Act Section 404 jurisdiction. For the USACE permit to be valid, the applicant shall apply for and obtain the accompanying Section 401 Water Quality Certification from the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (San Francisco Bay RWQCB). The applicant shall apply for and obtain a separate Waiver of Waste Discharge Requirements from the San Francisco Bay RWQCB for impacts to 0.496 acre of wetlands/waters of the State. To offset the loss of 0.496 acre of permanent 3923
wetland impacts and to ensure there is no- net loss of wetland area, the applicant shall establish/create 0.992 acre of wetlands (2:1 ratio), prior to or concurrent with the start of construction, on the 45-acre Wetland Preserve. The established/created wetlands shall be monitored for a minimum of 5 years to ensure the wetlands meet the USACE’s and RWQCB’s definition of a wetland. The applicant shall implement the terms of the approved permit(s).

94. MM BIO-3c: Prior to issuance of the Phase 1 grading permit, a Wetland Mitigation and Monitoring Plan shall be prepared and submitted to the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (San Francisco Bay RWQCB) for review as part of the process for obtaining a permit from the agency.

The Wetland Mitigation and Monitoring Plan shall address the loss of 0.496 acre of wetlands impact due to Phase 1 of the proposed project as well as the potential loss of approximately 3.7 acres of wetlands that as part of Phase 2.

The Wetland Mitigation and Monitoring Plan shall include in irrevocable instrument (e.g., deed restriction or conservation easements) that shall restrict use of both the 0.992 acre of created wetlands for Phase 1 as well as approximately 3.7 acres of additional wetlands created for Phase 2.

The Wetland Mitigation and Monitoring Plan shall also include a long-term endowment that would be fully funded by the proposed project to manage approximately 45-acre open space preserve and created wetlands in perpetuity. If additional wetland mitigation lands are required to compensate for wetland impacts associated with Phase 2, wetlands shall be established/created at a minimum 1:1 ratio (1 acre established/created for every acre permanently impacted) on appropriate mitigation land, approved by the RWQCB and United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), within the Phase 2 project site’s Hydraulic Unit Code (HUC) 10 watershed. The established/created wetlands shall be monitored for a minimum of 5 years to ensure the wetlands meet the USACE’s and RWQCB’s definition of a wetland. The applicant shall implement the terms of the approved permit(s).

95. MM BIO-3d: Prior to issuance of the Phase 1 and Phase 2 grading permit, a Wetland Mitigation and Monitoring Plan shall be submitted to the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (San Francisco Bay RWQCB) for review as part of the process for obtaining a permit from the agency.

The Wetland Mitigation and Monitoring Plan shall be prepared in accordance with the Subpart J– Compensatory Mitigation for Losses of Aquatic Resources outlined in the California State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) Procedures, and in accordance with the State Water Board Implementation Guidance dated April 2020, and in accordance with the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Compensatory Mitigation Rule (33 Code of Federal Regulations Part 332).

96. The basic objective of the Wetland Mitigation and Monitoring Plan is to ensure that project wetland impacts, and compensatory mitigation proposed to offset the wetland impacts, shall provide a nonet-loss of area of wetlands, and wetlands established/created shall be in-kind to the wetlands impacted. In summary, the Wetland Mitigation and Monitoring Plan shall at a minimum:
a. Preserve 7.58 acres of existing seasonal wetlands and 0.13 acre of vernal pools within the 45-acre Wetland Preserve.
b. Establish within the Wetland Preserve approximately 0.992 acre of seasonal wetlands in advance of or concurrent with implementation of Phase 1 impacts to 0.496 acre of palustrine emergent wetlands at a 2:1 ratio.
c. Establish within the Wetland Preserve approximately 2.57 acres of seasonal wetlands and 1.13 acres of vernal pools in advance of implementation of future Phase 2, assuming Phase 2 is built out, to address the potential maximum losses of approximately 3.7 acres of wetlands that may occur.
3924
d. Provide financial assurances to ensure a high level of confidence that the compensatory mitigation shall be successfully completed, in accordance with applicable performance standards. e. Design ecological performance standards to assess whether the Wetland Mitigation and Monitoring Plan is achieving the overall objectives, so that it can be objectively evaluated to determine whether it is developing into the desired resource type (vernal pool, seasonal wetland e.g.), and attaining any other applicable metrics such as acres, number of native plant species, water saturation and/or ponding depth etc.
f. Monitor the site for a duration necessary to determine whether the Wetland Mitigation and Monitoring Plan is meeting the performance standards. Established palustrine emergent wetlands and vernal pools typically develop quickly on soils with clay restrictive horizon. The 45-acre Wetland Preserve does have a clay restrictive layer approximately 8–18 inches below the surface therefore a 5- year monitoring period would be sufficient to determine whether performance standards are met. This monitoring period may be extended if performance standards are not met due to how the wetlands were constructed or natural events such as severe droughts. g. Protect the approximately 45-acre Wetland Preserve in perpetuity using a conservation easement, and provide an endowment sufficient to fund the Long-Term Management Plan. h. An overall assessment of the condition of the wetlands that shall be permanently impacted by the proposed project shall be conducted using the California Rapid Assessment Method (CRAM) for depressional wetlands, or a hybrid approach based on CRAM. Each similar wetland type that may be impacted shall be assessed to describe the floristic community and record the native and nonnative dominant plants within the vernal pool and palustrine emergent wetlands. Physical structure such as topographic complexity and physical features that may provide habitat for aquatic species (e.g., boulders, woody debris etc.) shall be recorded and used to design the created/established wetlands. The purpose of this assessment is to ensure the design of the wetlands shall provide habitat that is similar to the wetlands being impacted to ensure the impacted wetlands are mitigated in-kind.

Performance Standards
Performance Standards shall include at a minimum the following:

Years 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 Performance Standards for Wetland Hydrology Each year wetland hydrology shall be measured during the winter when surface and/or subsurface hydrology would be observable. A minimum of 1 data point shall be taken in each of the established/created wetlands. In addition, wetland hydrologic indicators shall be recorded each spring during the vegetation monitoring period.

Year 1:

Performance standard would be met for Year 1-5 if:
• The created wetlands remain inundated to a minimum depth of 0.5 inch or greater for at least 7 days and/or saturated for at least 14 days and/or at least one primary or two secondary wetland hydrology indicators listed in the Arid West Region Wetland Determination Data Forms are recorded.
3925
Contingency Measures:

If the annual performance standard is not being met for any given monitoring year the Permittee shall prepare an analysis of the cause(s) of failure and, if determined necessary, implement remedial action. If the Plan Area has not met the performance standard, the Permittee’s maintenance and monitoring obligations shall continue until the RWQCB and CDFW give final project confirmation.

Remedial action may include re-grading to achieve wetland hydrology, which would improve hydric soil formation.

Years 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 Performance Standards for Increase in Colonization of Wetland Vegetation
Each year during the spring or early summer wetland vegetation cover shall be measured by conducting a site visit and recording absolute cover and dominant plant species observed within the wetland buffer area. A minimum of 1 data point shall be taken in each of the established/created wetlands. The colonization of wetland vegetation shall be measured by determining overall absolute plant cover values each year. Thisshall be accomplished by measuring absolute cover values within a 5-foot radius sample plot every 50 feet along a transect through each established/created wetland. In addition, to monitor for invasive plant species within the uplands which are not detected in the baseline survey, a minimum of three 5-foot radius sample plots on the east side and three on the west side will be placed at random upland locations along a linear transect east to west within the Wetland Preserve.

Performance Standards for each monitoring year are listed below.

Year 1:

Year 2:

Year 3:
3926
Performance standard would be met for Year 3 if:
• Atleast two hydrophytic plantspecies colonizesthe established/created seasonal wetlands; • At least two native hydrophytic plantspecies colonizesthe established/created vernal pools and at least one is a vernal pool habitat indicator species; and • The average absolute cover of wetland vegetation within an established/created seasonal wetlands and vernal pools is 20 percent or greater and comprised of native and naturalized species.

Year 4:

Invasive plants shall be defined as species rated as “High” by California Invasive Plant Council (Cal-IPC) and species on the ”Alert” or “Watch” list with a High rating.

Year 5:

Invasive plants shall be defined as species rated as “High” by California Invasive Plant Council (Cal-IPC) and species on the ”Alert” or “Watch” list with a High rating.

Contingency Measures:

If the annual performance standard is not being met for any given monitoring year the Permittee shall prepare an analysis of the cause(s) of failure and, if determined necessary, implement remedial action. Remedial action may include hydroseeding with native species, or addition of supplemental topsoil or mulch to promote growth.

Once Phase 2 has been approved by the RWQCB and USACE, this performance standard may be modified depending on the level of wetland impacts authorized by the RWQCB and USACE, meaning this performance standard may decrease if the wetlands impacted for Phase 1 are less than 3.7 acres.

Performance standard would be met for Year 5 when;
• A wetland delineation is performed and verified by the USACE and confirms a minimum of

2.57 acres ofseasonal wetland and 1.13 acres of vernal pools have been established/created within the Wetland Preserve.

Year 5 Long-Term Protection and Long-Term Funding
Performance standard would be met for Year 5 once:
• The Wetland Preserve has been placed under a conservation easement; and A long-term financing mechanism (e.g., non-wasting endowment, trusts, contractual arrangement etc.) to fund implementation of the long-term management of the Wetland Preserve has been secured.

97. MM BIO-4: If construction occurs during the breeding season of migratory and resident birds (February 1 to August 31), a qualified Biologist shall conduct a pre-construction breeding bird survey in areas of suitable habitat within 7 days prior to the onset of construction activity. Surveys shall be 3928
conducted within the project footprint and 100 feet from the construction limits for nesting passerines, 250 feet from the construction limits for nesting accipiters and a minimum of 500 feet from the construction limits for nesting raptors. If the survey area is found to be absent of nesting birds, no further mitigation would be required. However, if construction activities are delayed by more than 7 days, an additional nesting bird survey shall be performed.

If bird nests are found, appropriate buffer zones shall be established around all active nests to protect nesting adults and their young from direct or indirect impacts related to project construction disturbance. Size of buffer zones shall be determined per recommendations of the qualified Biologist based on site conditions and species involved, but typical buffers around active nests are 500 feet for large raptors such as buteos, 250 feet for small raptors such as accipiters, and 100 feet for passerines (songbirds) and other bird species. For special status species, a 0.25-mile shall be established for nesting Swainson’s hawk; 1.0 mile for golden eagle; and a 500-foot buffer for nesting tricolored blackbirds. If an active nest is located outside of the project site, the buffer shall be extended onto the project site and demarcated where it intersects the project site. Buffer zones shall be maintained until it can be documented that either the nest has failed, or the young have fledged.

98. MM CUL-2a: No ground disturbance shall take place within 100 feet of informal archaeological resource 483A-001. The resource shall be preserved in place.

99. MM CUL-2b: An Archaeologist who meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards for archaeology shall be present on-site during all earth disturbing activities. If prehistoric or historic-period archaeological resources are encountered, all construction activities within 100 feet of the find shall halt and the City of American Canyon shall be notified. Prehistoric archaeological materials may include obsidian and chert flaked stone tools (e.g., projectile points, knives, scrapers) or toolmaking debris; culturally darkened soil (“midden”) containing heat-affected rocks, artifacts, or shellfish remains; and stone milling equipment (e.g., mortars, pestles, hand stones, or milling slabs); and battered stone tools, such as hammerstones and pitted stones. Historic- period materials might include stone, concrete, or adobe footings and walls; filled wells or privies; and deposits of metal, glass, and/or ceramic refuse.

Consistent with Section 15126.4(b)(3), this may be accomplished through planning construction to avoid the resource; incorporating the resource within open space; capping and covering the resource; or deeding the site into a permanent conservation easement. If avoidance is not feasible, a qualified Archaeologist shall prepare and implement a detailed treatment plan in consultation with the City of American Canyon. Treatment of unique archaeological resources shall follow the applicable requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21083.2. Treatment for most resources would consist of (but would not be limited to) sample excavation, artifact collection, and site documentation, with the aim to target the recovery of important scientific data contained in the portion(s) of the significant resource to be impacted by the proposed project. The treatment plan shall include provisions for analysis of data in a regional context, reporting of results within a timely manner, curation of artifacts and data at an approved facility, and dissemination of reports to local and State repositories, libraries, and interested professionals.
100. MM CUL-3: In the event of the accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains, CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5, Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, and Public Resources Code 3929
Sections 5097.94 and Section 5097.98 shall be followed. If during project construction, there is accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains, the following steps shall be taken:
a. There shall be no further excavation or disturbance within 100 feet of the remains until the County Coroner is contacted to determine whether the remains are Native American and if an investigation of the cause of death is required. If the Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Coroner shall contact the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) within 24 hours, and the NAHC shall identify the person or persons it believes to be the Most Likely Descendant (MLD) of the deceased Native American. The MLD may make recommendations to the landowner or the person responsible for the excavation work within 48 hours, for means of treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains, and any associated grave goods as provided in Public Resource Code Section 5097.98. b. Where the following conditions occur, the landowner or authorized representative shall rebury the Native American human remains and associated grave goods with appropriate dignity either in accordance with the recommendations of the MLD or on the project site in a location not subject to further subsurface disturbance:
• The NAHC is unable to identify an MLD or the MLD failed to make a recommendation within 48 hours after being notified by the commission.
• The descendant identified fails to make a recommendation. • The landowner or authorized representative rejects the recommendation of the descendant, and mediation by the NAHC fails to provide measures acceptable to the landowner.

Additionally, California Public Resources Code Section 15064.5 requires the following relative to Native American Remains:
(1) When an initial study identifies the existence of, or the probable likelihood of, Native American Remains within a project, a lead agency shall work with the appropriate Native Americans as identified by the NAHC as provided in Public Resources Code Section 5097.98.

The applicant may each develop a plan with respect to their respective individual development proposals for treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains, and any items associated with Native American Burials with the appropriate Native Americans as identified by the NAHC.
101. MM CUL-4: A Tribal Monitor representing the Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation shall be present during all project-related ground disturbance. Additionally, the Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation’s Treatment Protocol (Protocol) shall be followed with respect to Tribal Cultural Resources (TCRs). The purpose of the protocol is to formalize procedures for the treatment of Native American human remains, grave goods, ceremonial items, and items of cultural patrimony, if any are found in conjunction with development, including archaeological studies, excavation, geotechnical investigations, grading, and any ground-disturbing activity. This Protocol also formalizes procedures for Tribal Monitoring during archaeological studies, grading, and ground-disturbing activities. a. Cultural Affiliation: The Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation (Tribe) traditionally occupied lands in Yolo, Solano, Lake, Colusa, and Napa Counties. The Tribe has designated its Cultural Resources Committee (Committee) to act on the Tribe's behalf with respect to the provisions of this Protocol.

Any human remains which are found in conjunction with projects on lands culturally affiliated with the Tribe shall be treated in accordance with Section III of this Protocol. Any other cultural resources shall be treated in accordance with Section IV of this Protocol. b. Inadvertent Discovery of Native American Human Remains: Whenever Native American human remains are found during the course of a project, the determination of Most Likely Descendant 3930
(MLD) under California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 will be made by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) upon notification to the NAHC of the discovery of said remains at a project site. If the location of the site and the history and prehistory of the area is culturally affiliated with the Tribe, the NAHC contacts the Tribe; a Tribal member will be designated by the Tribe to consult with the landowner and/or project proponents.

Should the NAHC determine that a member of an Indian tribe other than Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation is the MLD, and the Tribe agrees with this determination, the terms of this Protocol relating to the treatment of such Native American human remains shall not be applicable; however, that situation is very unlikely.
c. Treatment of Native American Remains: In the event that Native American human remains are found during development of a project and the Tribe or a member of the Tribe is determined to be MLD pursuant to Section II of this Protocol, the following provisions shall apply. The Medical Examiner shall immediately be notified, ground-disturbing activities in that location shall cease and the Tribe shall be allowed, pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(a), to (1) inspect the site of the discovery and (2) make determinations as to how the human remains and grave goods shall be treated and disposed of with appropriate dignity. The Tribe shall complete its inspection and make its MLD recommendation within 48 hours of getting access to the site. The Tribe shall have the final determination as to the disposition and treatment of human remains and grave goods. Said determination may include avoidance of the human remains, reburial on-site, or reburial on tribal or other lands that will not be disturbed in the future. The Tribe may wish to rebury said human remains and grave goods or ceremonial and cultural items on or near the site of their discovery, in an area which will not be subject to future disturbances over a prolonged period of time. Reburial of human remains shall be accomplished in compliance with the California Public Resources Code Sections 5097.98(a) and (b). The term "human remains" encompasses more than human bones because the Tribe’s traditions call for the burial of associated cultural items with the deceased (funerary objects), and/or the ceremonial burning of Native American human remains, funerary objects, grave goods, and animals. Ashes, soils, and other remnants of these burning ceremonies, as well as associated funerary objects and unassociated funerary objects buried with or found near the Native American remains are to be treated in the same manner as bones or bone fragments that remain intact. d. Non-Disclosure of Location of Reburials: Unless otherwise required by law, the site of any reburial of Native American human remains shall not be disclosed and will not be governed by public disclosure requirements of the California Public Records Act, California Government Code Section 6250 et seq. The Medical Examiner shall withhold public disclosure of information related to such reburial pursuant to the specific exemption set forth in California Government Code Section 6254(r). The Tribe will require that the location for reburial is recorded with the California Historic Resources Inventory System (CHRIS) on a form acceptable to the CHRIS center. The Tribe may also suggest the landowner enter into an agreement regarding the confidentiality of site information that will run with title on the property.
e. Treatment of Cultural Resources: Treatment of all cultural items, including ceremonial items and archaeological items will reflect the religious beliefs, customs, and practices of the Tribe. All cultural items, including ceremonial items and archaeological items, which may be found at a project site shall be turned over to the Tribe for appropriate treatment, unless ordered by a court or agency of competent jurisdiction. The project proponent shall waive any and all claims to ownership of Tribal ceremonial and cultural items, including archaeological items, which may be found on a project site in favor of the Tribe. If any intermediary, (for example, an Archaeologist retained by the project proponent) is necessary, said entity or individual shall not possess those items for longer than is reasonably necessary, as determined solely by the Tribe. 3931
f. Inadvertent Discoveries: If additional significant sites or sites not identified as significant in a project environmental review process, but later determined to be significant, are located within a project impact area, such sites will be subjected to further archaeological and cultural significance evaluation by the project proponent, the Lead Agency, and the Tribe to determine whether additional mitigation measures are necessary to treat sites in a culturally appropriate manner consistent with CEQA requirements for mitigation of impacts to cultural resources. If there are human remains present that have been identified as Native American, all work will cease for a period of up to 30 days in accordance with Federal Law. 102. MM GEO-1b: Prior to the issuance of building permits for each Phase 1 and 2 structure, the project applicant shall submit a design-level Geotechnical Investigation to the City of American Canyon for review and approval. The investigation shall be prepared by a qualified engineer and identify grading and building practices necessary to achieve compliance with the latest adopted edition of the California Building Standards Code (CBC) geologic, soils, and seismic requirements, including abatement of expansive soil conditions. The report shall also determine the final design parameters for walls, foundations, foundation slabs, and surrounding related improvements (e.g., utilities roadways, parking lots, and sidewalks). The measures identified in the approved report shall be incorporated into the project plans and all applicable construction-related permits. 103. MM GEO-5: If potential fossils are discovered during project implementation, all earthwork or other types of ground disturbance within 100 feet of the find shall stop immediately until a qualified professional Paleontologist can assess the nature and importance of the find. Based on the scientific value or uniqueness of the find, the Paleontologist shall either record the find and recommend that the City of American Canyon allow work to continue or recommend salvage and recovery of the fossil.

The Paleontologist shall, if required, propose modifications to the stop-work radius based on the nature of the find, site geology, and the activities occurring on the site. If treatment and salvage is required, recommendations will be consistent with Society of Vertebrate Paleontology guidelines and currently accepted scientific practice. If required, treatment for fossil remains shall include preparation and recovery of fossil materials so that they can be housed in an appropriate museum or university collection, and, if required, shall also include preparation of a report for publication describing the finds.
104. MM GHG-1a: Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the project applicant shall provide the City of American Canyon with documentation (e.g., site plans) demonstrating project construction will include the following construction Best Management Practices (BMPs):
a. At least 15 percent of the construction fleet for each project phase shall be alternatively fueled or electric.
b. At least 10 percent of building materials used for project construction shall be sourced from local suppliers.
c. At least 65 percent of construction and demolition waste materials shall be recycled or reused.
d. At least one contractor that has a businesslocation in American Canyon shall be contracted for project construction.
e. All construction contracts shall include language that requires all off-road equipment with a power rating below 19 kilowatts (e.g., plate compactors, pressure washers) using during construction be electrically powered.
f. Architectural coatings used for project construction shall be “Low-VOC,” containing no greater 3932
than 50 grams of volatile organic compounds (VOC) per liter of product. g. Project construction shall prohibit the use of generators and shall establish grid power connection to electrical equipment needs.
h. Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to 5 minutes (as required by the California Airborne Toxics Control Measure [ATCM] Title 13, Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations). Clear signage regarding idling restrictions shall be provided for construction workers at all access points. i. All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer’s specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified mechanic and determined to be running in proper condition prior to operation. j. The prime construction contractor shall post a publicly visible sign with their telephone number and contractor to contact. The construction contractor shall take corrective action within 48 hours. The BAAQMD’s phone number shall also be identified and visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations.
105. MM GHG-1b: Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the project applicant shall provide the City of American Canyon with documentation (e.g., site plans) demonstrating the proposed project is designed without the use of any natural gas -fueled appliances or natural gas plumbing. 106. MM GHG-1c: Prior to issuance of any building permits, the project applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City of American Canyon (e.g., shown on-site plans), that the proposed buildings are designed and will be built to, at a minimum, the Tier 2 advanced energy efficiency requirements of the Nonresidential Voluntary Measures of the California Green Building Standards Code, Division A5.2, Energy Efficiency, as outlined under Section A5.203.1.2.2. 107. MM GHG-1d: Prior to issuance of any building permits, the project applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City of American Canyon (e.g., shown on-site plans), that the proposed parking areas for passenger automobiles and trucks are designed and will be built to accommodate electric vehicle (EV) charging stations. At a minimum, the parking shall be designed to accommodate a number of EV charging stations equal to the Tier 2 Nonresidential Voluntary Measures of the California Green Building Standards Code, Section A5.106.5.3.2. 108. MM GHG-1d: Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the project applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City of American Canyon (e.g., shown on-site plans), that each loading dock is outfitted with at least one 240-volt outlet to accommodate truck and Transport Refrigeration Unit (TRU) charging and/or electrical power connection while trucks are loading and unloading goods.
109. MM GHG-1e: Prior to the issuance of any building permit for the proposed project, the project applicant shall provide the City with documentation (e.g., site plans) demonstrating to the City’s satisfaction that the electricity demand will be supplied with 100 percent carbon-free electricity sources through the year 2045. As City decision maker, the City Council requires this mitigation measure be accomplished with on-site solar panel electricity. 110. MM HYD-1a: Prior to issuance of grading permits for the proposed project, the applicant shall submit to the City of American Canyon for review and approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) in accordance with the requirements of the statewide Construction General Permit.

The SWPPP shall be designed to address the following objectives: (1) all pollutants and their sources 3933
(e.g., runoff), including sources of sediment associated with construction, construction site erosion, and all other activities associated with construction activity, are controlled; (2) where not otherwise required to be under a Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) permit, all non-stormwater discharges are identified and either eliminated, controlled, or treated; (3) site Best Management Practices (BMPs) (e.g., silt fencing, street sweeping, routine inspection, etc.) are effective and result in the reduction or elimination of pollutants in stormwater discharges and authorized nonstormwater discharges from construction activity; and (4) stabilization BMPs are installed to reduce or eliminate pollutants after construction are completed. The SWPPP shall be prepared by a qualified SWPPP developer. The SWPPP shall include the minimum BMPs required for the identified Risk Level. BMP implementation shall be consistent with the BMP requirements in the most recent version of the California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) Stormwater Best Management Handbook–Construction or the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Stormwater Quality Handbook Construction Site BMPs Manual. The SWPPP shall be implemented during construction.
111. MM HYD-1b: Prior to the issuance of building permits, the project applicant shall submit a Stormwater Control Plan to the City of American Canyon for review and approval. The plan shall be developed using the California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) “New Development and Redevelopment Handbook” and include applicable provisions of Section C.3 of the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Municipal Regional Permit (Order No. R2-2015- 0049, NPDES Permit No. CAS612008 (or more recent permit). The Stormwater Control Plan shall identify pollution prevention measures and Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control stormwater pollution from operational activities and facilities and provide maintenance in perpetuity. The Stormwater Control Plan shall include Low Impact Development (LID) design concepts, as well as concepts that accomplish a “first flush” objective that remove contaminants from the first 2 inches of stormwater before it enters area waterways. The project applicant shall also prepare and submit an Operations and Maintenance Agreement to the City, identifying procedures to ensure stormwater quality control measures work properly during operations. 112. MM LU-3: Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall retain a qualified Biologist to assess potential wildlife hazards to aviation. The assessment shall evaluate the characteristics of the emergent wetlands, drainages, other potential wildlife attractant features (i.e., ponded water) located within the open space area and identify management practices (e.g., storm drainage, vegetation, etc.) to prevent the creation of attractants for large flocks or birds or other wildlife species that may present safety hazards to aviation activities. As part of the assessment, the applicant shall consult with Napa County Airport and Napa County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) representatives, as appropriate, regarding findings and recommendations. The applicant shall submit a report to the City of American Canyon prepared by a qualified Biologist that confirms the wildlife hazard assessment’s findings and recommendations are incorporated into the design of the open space preserve.
113. MM NOI-1: Implementation of the following multi-part mitigation measure is required to reduce potential construction period noise impacts:
a. The construction contractor shall ensure that all equipment driven by internal combustion engines shall be equipped with mufflers that are in good condition and appropriate for the equipment.
b. The construction contractor shall ensure that unnecessary idling of internal combustion engines (i.e., idling in excess of 5 minutes) is prohibited.
3934
c. The construction contractor shall utilize “quiet” models of air compressors and other stationary noise sources where technology exists.
d. At all times during project grading and construction, the construction contractor shall ensure that stationary noise- generating equipment shall be located as far as practicable from sensitive receptors and placed so that emitted noise is directed away from adjacent residences. e. The construction contractor shall ensure that the construction staging areas shall be located to create the greatest feasible distance between the staging area and noise-sensitive receptors nearest the project site.
114. MM NOI-1: The construction contractor shall ensure that all on-site construction activities, including the operation of any tools or equipment used in construction, drilling, repair, alteration, grading, or demolition work, are limited to between the daytime hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.

Monday through Saturday. No construction shall be permitted on Sundays and federal holidays.

PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council of the City of American Canyon held on the 21st day of February, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
____________________________
Leon Garcia, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________ ___________________________ Taresa Geilfuss, CMC, City Clerk William D. Ross, City Attorney EXHIBITS:

A. Giovannoni Logistics Center Design Permit Plans
B. Confirmation of Conditions of Approval
C. ACFPD Resolution 2022-29
3935
project number :
scale :
stamp
drawn by :
checked by :
plot date :
approved for the architect by :
approved for the owner by :
sheet no. :

PRELIMINARY DESIGN DOCUMENTS FOR:

CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON, CALIFORNIA
GREEN ISLAND ROAD AT HIGHWAY 29

GIOVANNONI
2204049.00

AS NOTED
RDG/AG 11-11-2020
JDL

A PLANNING SUBMITTAL

INITIAL DESIGN REVIEW
11-11-2020
issue : description : date :
555 CAPITOL MALL SUITE 900
SACRAMENTO, CA 95814
PHONE: 916.379.3800

LOGISTICS CENTER
OWNER / DEVELOPER:

GENERAL CONTRACTOR:
1718 Third Street
Suite 101
Sacramento
California 95811
RMW
Architecture
Interiors
Office
916 449-1400
rmw.com
A00.1

COVER SHEET
VICINITY MAP: PROJECT TEAM: SHEET INDEX:

P:925-866-0322 x247
CIVIL ENGINEER:

CBG CIVIL ENGINEERINGS
2633 CAMINO RAMON, SUITE 350
SAN RAMON, CA 94583

ANDREA BELLANCA,
[email protected]
OWNER

BUZZ OATES
SACRAMENTO, CA 95814

DEVELOPMENT PROJECT MANAGER
[email protected]

JEFF LEONHARDT,
SACRAMENTO, CA 95811
1718 3RD STREET, SUITE 101

RMW ARCHITECTURE & INTERIORS
ARCHITECT:

P: 916-379-3800
P:916-449-1400 x405 [email protected]
[email protected]

ERIC DEARING
SACRAMENTO, CA 95821
3323 WATT AVE, #229
VISTA PARKS LANDSCAPING, INC.

LANDSCAPE DESIGNER
P: 916-681-2227 F: 916-681-2228
555 CAPITOL MALL, STE. 900

PROJECT ARCHITECT &
A00.1 COVER SHEET *
A00.2 PROJECT RENDERINGS *
A01.0 PRELIMINARY MASTER SITE PLAN *
A01.1 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN - BLDG A*
A01.2 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN - BLDG B*
A01.7 SITE DETAILS
A02.1 PRELIMINARY FLOOR PLAN - BLDG A
A02.2 PRELIMINARY FLOOR PLAN - BLDG B
A02.7 PRELIMINARY ROOF PLAN - BLDG A
A02.8 PRELIMINARY ROOF PLAN - BLDG B
A03.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BLDG A*
A03.2 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BLDG B*
CIVIL
TM-1 TITLE SHEET AND SITE PLAN
TM-2 EXISTING CONDITIONS
TM-3 PRELIMINARY GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN
TM-4 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN
TM-5 PRELIMINARY STORM WATER CONTROL PLAN
TM-6 PRELIMINARY FIRE ACCESS PLAN

LANDSCAPE
LP PRELIMINARY PLANTING PLAN *
*DENOTES A SHEET TO BE PRINTED IN FULL COLOR

PROJECT DESIGNER

VICE PRESIDENT
giovannoni

LOGISTICS CENTER
PLANNING SUBMITTAL DRAWINGS FOR:

GREEN ISLAND ROAD AT HIGHWAY 29

CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON, CA
Site: The project site is located along Lincoln Highway 29 & Green Valley Road. in the City of American Canyon, California. The project will include approximately +/- 70 acres of land and encompass two separate buildings. Buildings A and B will be located on the East side of Devlin Road.

Total has a Gross Square Footage of all buildings will be +/- 1.07 million sf of floor space. See individual building square footages below:

Building A: 627,976 square feet.

Building B: 469,512 square feet.

Industrial buildings will be of Type VB construction, site cast, tilted concrete panels with a variety of architectural enhancements. The typical wall panels are to be enhanced with reveals and a textured elastomeric, multicolored coating system. The areas around the building entries are also enhanced with tinted glazing in aluminum frames with overhead steel-framed painted canopies. The placement of these enhancements is focused at those locations most visible from the public roadways.

Site Access and Parking:

Entry into the site can be accessed at three entrance drives proposed along Green Island Road. Additional site entry can be obtained at Delvin Road The site will include a semi-truck access aisles that will be separate from employee vehicle parking.

Signage: The proposed signage in this submittal includes is for reference only. Criteria for future tenant signage will be provided at a later and under a separate permit as required.

Landscaping: The project will be fully landscaped using plants appropriate for and indigenous to the City of American Canyon. Low water use plants will be used extensively, while moderate water use plants will be concentrated at accent points, such as driveways and building entries. For further landscaping design information, see "Design Notes" on the LP Preliminary Landscape Plan.

Sustainable Materials & Construction Practices: The project will incorporate a variety of sustainable materials and construction practices to include the following: 1) A storm water pollution prevention plan to minimize contamination, erosion, and dust pollution during construction. All storm water runoff from impervious surfaces (roofs and paving) will be routed through a specially designed water quality detention and treatment basin.

Additionally, on-site detention will be provided to meet the City of American Canyon standards. 2) Storage and collection of recyclable materials. 3) Construction waste management. 4) Environmental tobacco smoke control. 5) Heat reflecting roof membranes. 6) Light pollution reduction. 7) Water efficient landscaping. 8) Water use reduction methods. 9) Low VOC emitting sealants, adhesives, coatings, floorings, and wood materials. 10) Roof structures designed to accommodate additional weight for roof-top photovoltaic electricity generation panel arrays. 11) California Green Building Code compliant electric vehicle charging stations at seven locations. 12) The project architect is a LEED accredited professional and will apply his knowledge of LEED techniques and practices to the project design and construction.

PROJECT NARRATIVE:

JOE LIVAICH

PERSPECTIVE RENDERINGS OF TYPICAL LOGISTIC CENTER BUILDINGS

PROJECT

LOCATION

SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD

GREEN ISLAND ROAD
LINCOLN HIGHWAY / HIGHWAY 29

PRINCIPAL DEVLIN ROAD
ATTACHMENT 2.EXHIBIT A

EXHIBIT A
3936
A00.2

PROJECT

RENDERINGS -
project number :
scale :
stamp
drawn by :
checked by :
plot date :
approved for the architect by :
approved for the owner by :
sheet no. :

PRELIMINARY DESIGN DOCUMENTS FOR:

CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON, CALIFORNIA
GREEN ISLAND ROAD AT HIGHWAY 29

GIOVANNONI
2204049.00

AS NOTED
RDG/AG 11-11-2020
JDL

A PLANNING SUBMITTAL

INITIAL DESIGN REVIEW
11-11-2020
issue : description : date :
555 CAPITOL MALL SUITE 900
SACRAMENTO, CA 95814
PHONE: 916.379.3800

LOGISTICS CENTER
OWNER / DEVELOPER:

GENERAL CONTRACTOR:
1718 Third Street
Suite 101
Sacramento
California 95811
RMW
Architecture
Interiors
Office
916 449-1400
rmw.com
1 PROJECT RENDERINGS

BUILDING A

BUILDING B

BUILDING B
3937

GREEN ISLAND ROAD DEVLIN ROAD
3,057,581 S.F. ± SITE AREA =

70.19 ACRES
TOTAL BUILDING AREA = 1,069,904 S.F. =

34.99% COVERAGE
110,766 S.F. ± AREA OF STORM RETENTION
SHOWN
97,842 S.F. ± REQUIRED

SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD NO TRUCKS NO TRUCKS

NO TRUCKS STOP STOP STOP
STOP
STOP

STOP STOP STOP

LANDSCAPE
AREA
BUILDING AREA ASPHALT AREA 50' WETLAND BUFFER 9' X 10' OVERHEAD DOCK

LEVEL DOOR

SITE CONCRETE DEVLIN RD /

GREEN ISLAND RD

WETLAND IMPACT

STORM WATER

RETENTION
AREA
12' X 14' OVERHEAD GRADE

LEVEL DOOR

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE

ISOLATED

WETLANDS

UNAVOIDABLE

WETLAND

IMPACTS

WATERS OF
THE U.S.

WETLANDS

NEW PARCEL LINE

POTENTIAL

OFFICE AREA NEW RAIL SPUR
project number :
scale :
stamp
drawn by :
checked by :
plot date :
approved for the architect by :
approved for the owner by :
sheet no. :

PRELIMINARY DESIGN DOCUMENTS FOR:

CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON, CALIFORNIA
GREEN ISLAND ROAD AT HIGHWAY 29

GIOVANNONI
2204049.00

AS NOTED
RDG/AG 11-11-2020
JDL

A PLANNING SUBMITTAL

INITIAL DESIGN REVIEW
11-11-2020
issue : description : date :
555 CAPITOL MALL SUITE 900
SACRAMENTO, CA 95814
PHONE: 916.379.3800

LOGISTICS CENTER
OWNER / DEVELOPER:

GENERAL CONTRACTOR:
1718 Third Street
Suite 101
Sacramento
California 95811
RMW
Architecture
Interiors
Office
916 449-1400
rmw.com
A01.0

PRELIMINARY

OVERALL

SITE PLAN
1 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN
KEYNOTES:
1 A01.1
1 A01.2
4698,521 S.F.

SITE COVERAGE: 37.87%
BUILDING AREA:

ZONING:

TOTAL GROSS SITE AREA:

APN :

CONSTRUCTION TYPE: III-B
BUILDING HEIGHT:

NUMBER OF STORIES: 1
PARKING: 430 STALLS TOTAL
2016-0016509
PARKING STANDARDS: (AMERICAN CANYON MUNICIPAL CODE CH. 19.21) · STANDARD STALLS: 9' X 19' (17' WITH A 2'-0" OVERHANG) · COMPACT STALLS: 8' X 16' (14' WITH A 2'-0" OVERHANG) (40% MAX) · DRIVE ISLES: 25'-0" ONE-WAY, 25'-0" MIN TWO-WAY · FIRE TRUCK RADIUS: 25'-0" INSIDE, 50' OUTSIDE
· EMERGENCY ACCESS AISLE: 20'-0" MIN
REQUIRED PARKING (NAPA COUNTY ZONING CH. 18.110.030): · WAREHOUSE: 1 PER EACH 1,000 SQ. FT. FOR THE FIRST 10,000 SQ. FT., AND 1 PER 2,000 SQ. FT.

FOR ALL WAREHOUSE AREA EXCEEDING 10,000 SQ. FT . (469,512 - 10,000 = 459,512 / 2,000 = 229.75 = 230 + 10 = 240 STALLS) · OFFICE: 1 PER 300 SQ. FT. OF GROSS FLOOR AREA (OFFICE SPACE T.B.D.) BICYCLE PARKING: (AMERICAN CANYON MUNICIPAL CODE, CH. 19.21, TABLE 19.21.050) · TOTAL AUTOMOBILE PARKING SPACES: 200 - 299 = 8 (BICYCLE PARKING SHOULD BE LOCATED IN HIGHLY VISIBLE LOCATIONS AND SHOULD BE LOCKABLE) NET SITE AREA: 1,326,308 N.S.F. = 30.45 ACRES
3,057,581 G.S.F. = 70.19 ACRES

BUILDING B
CLEAR HEIGHT: 36'-0"
56'-4"

GI - GENERAL INDUSTRIAL
ACCESSIBLE & DESIGNATED PARKING STALLS (REQUIRED AND PROVIDED) :

PER 2019 CBC TABLE 11B-208.2: 401 TO 500 STALLS, 9 ADA STALLS REQUIRED VAN ACCESSIBLE STALLS: EVERY 6 OR FRACTION OF SIX, AT LEAST ONE SHALL BE VAN PARKING. (9 STALLS = 2 VAN ACCESSIBLE)
10 ADA STALLS (INCLUDING 2 VAN ACCESSIBLE STALLS) PROVIDED.

PER 2019 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING CODE TABLE 5.106.5.2: 201 AND OVER STALLS, AT LEAST 8% OF TOTAL. (432 * 0.08 = 34.4 = 35)
PER 2019 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING CODE TABLE 5.106.5.3.3, 201 AND OVER STALLS, 6% OF TOTAL STALLS TO BE ELECTRICAL VEHICLE CHARGING STATIONS (EVCS). (430 * 0.06 = 25.8 = 26) PER CBC TABLE 11B-228.3.2.1, 26 TO 50 EVCS STALLS, 1 VAN ACCESSIBLE EVCS, 1 STANDARD ACCESSIBLE EVCS AND 1 AMBULATORY EVCS ARE REQUIRED.

OF THE 26 EVCS REQUIRED, 1 VAN EVCS AND 1 STANDARD ADA EVCS AND 1 AMBULATORY ARE PROVIDED AS SHOWN.

OF THE 34 CLEAN AIR STALLS, 26 ARE EVCS AND (35 - 26) = 9 STALLS ARE TO BE LABELED WITH PAINTED LETTERS PER CALGREEN SECTION 5.106.5.2.1 STATING "CLEAN AIR / VANPOOL / EV". THE LOWER EDGE OF THE LAST WORK IS TO ALIGN WITH THE END OF THE PARKING STALL. 601,383 S.F.

SITE COVERAGE: 39.99%
BUILDING AREA:

ZONING:

TOTAL GROSS SITE AREA: 3,057,581 G.S.F. = 70.19 ACRES

GI - GENERAL INDUSTRIAL
APN :

CONSTRUCTION TYPE: III-B
BUILDING HEIGHT: 56'-4"
NUMBER OF STORIES: 1
PARKING: 430 STALLS TOTAL
2016-0016508
PARKING STANDARDS: (AMERICAN CANYON MUNICIPAL CODE CH. 19.21) · STANDARD STALLS: 9' X 19' (17' WITH A 2'-0" OVERHANG) · COMPACT STALLS: 8' X 16' (14' WITH A 2'-0" OVERHANG) (40% MAX) · DRIVE ISLES: 25'-0" ONE-WAY, 25'-0" MIN TWO-WAY · FIRE TRUCK RADIUS: 25'-0" INSIDE, 50' OUTSIDE
· EMERGENCY ACCESS AISLE: 20'-0" MIN
REQUIRED PARKING (NAPA COUNTY ZONING CH. 18.110.030): · WAREHOUSE: 1 PER EACH 1,000 SQ. FT. FOR THE FIRST 10,000 SQ. FT., AND 1 PER 2,000 SQ. FT.

FOR ALL WAREHOUSE AREA EXCEEDING 10,000 SQ. FT. (601,383 - 10,000 = 591,383 / 2,000 = 295.69 = 296 + 10 = 306 STALLS) · OFFICE: 1 PER 300 SQ. FT. OF GROSS FLOOR AREA (OFFICE SPACE T.B.D.) BICYCLE PARKING: (AMERICAN CANYON MUNICIPAL CODE, CH. 19.21, TABLE 19.21.050) · TOTAL AUTOMOBILE PARKING SPACES: 400 AND GREATER = 10 (BICYCLE PARKING SHOULD BE LOCATED IN HIGHLY VISIBLE LOCATIONS AND SHOULD BE LOCKABLE) PER 2019 CBC TABLE 11B-208.2: 401 TO 500 STALLS, 9 ADA STALLS REQUIRED VAN ACCESSIBLE STALLS: EVERY 6 OR FRACTION OF SIX, AT LEAST ONE SHALL BE VAN PARKING. (9 STALLS = 2 VAN ACCESSIBLE)
10 ADA STALLS (INCLUDING 2 VAN ACCESSIBLE STALLS) PROVIDED.

OF THE 26 EVCS REQUIRED, 1 VAN EVCS AND 1 STANDARD ADA EVCS AND 1 AMBULATORY ARE PROVIDED AS SHOWN.

BUILDING A
NET SITE AREA: 1,731,273 N.S.F. = 349.74 ACRES
ACCESSIBLE & DESIGNATED PARKING STALLS (REQUIRED AND PROVIDED) :

CLEAR HEIGHT: 36'-0"
SITE LEGEND:
3938

SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD NO TRUCKS NO TRUCKS

NO TRUCKS STOP STOP STOP
STOP
STOP

STOP STOP

GREEN ISLAND ROAD

PROPOSED ONE STORY
BUILDING "A"
36' CLR. HEIGHT
project number :
scale :
stamp
drawn by :
checked by :
plot date :
approved for the architect by :
approved for the owner by :
sheet no. :

PRELIMINARY DESIGN DOCUMENTS FOR:

CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON, CALIFORNIA
GREEN ISLAND ROAD AT HIGHWAY 29

GIOVANNONI
2204049.00

AS NOTED
RDG/AG 11-11-2020
JDL

A PLANNING SUBMITTAL

INITIAL DESIGN REVIEW
11-11-2020
issue : description : date :
555 CAPITOL MALL SUITE 900
SACRAMENTO, CA 95814
PHONE: 916.379.3800

LOGISTICS CENTER
OWNER / DEVELOPER:

GENERAL CONTRACTOR:
1718 Third Street
Suite 101
Sacramento
California 95811
RMW
Architecture
Interiors
Office
916 449-1400
rmw.com
A01.1

PRELIMINARY

SITE PLAN

BUILDING A
1 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN
601,383 S.F.

SITE COVERAGE: 39.99%
BUILDING AREA:

ZONING:

TOTAL GROSS SITE AREA: 3,057,581 G.S.F. = 70.19 ACRES

GI - GENERAL INDUSTRIAL
APN :

OF THE 26 EVCS REQUIRED, 1 VAN EVCS AND 1 STANDARD ADA EVCS AND 1 AMBULATORY ARE PROVIDED AS SHOWN.

BUILDING A
NET SITE AREA: 1,731,273 N.S.F. = 349.74 ACRES
ACCESSIBLE & DESIGNATED PARKING STALLS (REQUIRED AND PROVIDED) :

CLEAR HEIGHT: 36'-0"
SITE INFORMATION / STATISTICS:

KEYNOTES:

SITE LEGEND:

BUILDING AREA

LANDSCAPE AREA

CONCRETE AREA

ASPHALT AREA

BIOSWALE /

STORMWATER

DETENSION AREA

UNAVOIDABLE

WETLAND IMPACTS

WATERS OF THE
U.S. WETLANDS

DOCK LEVEL

OVERHEAD DOOR

GRADE LEVEL

OVERHEAD DOOR

FUTURE DRIVE-IN DOOR

KNOCK OUT
DEVLIN RD. / GREEN ISLAND
RD. WETLAND IMPACT

NEW RAIL SPUR
50' WETLAND BUFFER

ISOLATED

WETLANDS
3939

NO TRUCKS

NO TRUCKS STOP STOP
STOP
STOP

STOP STOP STOP DEVLIN ROAD

PROPOSED ONE STORY
BUILDING "B"
36' CLR. HEIGHT
project number :
scale :
stamp
drawn by :
checked by :
plot date :
approved for the architect by :
approved for the owner by :
sheet no. :

PRELIMINARY DESIGN DOCUMENTS FOR:

CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON, CALIFORNIA
GREEN ISLAND ROAD AT HIGHWAY 29

GREEN ISLAND ROAD
2204049.00

AS NOTED
RDG/AG 10-05-2020
JDL

A PLANNING SUBMITTAL

INITIAL DESIGN REVIEW
10-05-2020
issue : description : date :
555 CAPITOL MALL SUITE 900
SACRAMENTO, CA 95814
PHONE: 916.379.3800

LOGISTICS CENTER
OWNER / DEVELOPER:

GENERAL CONTRACTOR:
1718 Third Street
Suite 101
Sacramento
California 95811
RMW
Architecture
Interiors
Office
916 449-1400
rmw.com
A01.2

PRELIMINARY

SITE PLAN

BUILDING B
1 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN
4698,521 S.F.

SITE COVERAGE: 37.87%
BUILDING AREA:

ZONING:

TOTAL GROSS SITE AREA:

APN :

CONSTRUCTION TYPE: III-B
BUILDING HEIGHT:

BUILDING B
CLEAR HEIGHT: 36'-0"
56'-4"

GI - GENERAL INDUSTRIAL
ACCESSIBLE & DESIGNATED PARKING STALLS (REQUIRED AND PROVIDED) :

OF THE 26 EVCS REQUIRED, 1 VAN EVCS AND 1 STANDARD ADA EVCS AND 1 AMBULATORY ARE PROVIDED AS SHOWN.

SITE INFORMATION / STATISTICS:

KEYNOTES:

SITE LEGEND:

BUILDING AREA

LANDSCAPE AREA

CONCRETE AREA

ASPHALT AREA

BIOSWALE /

STORMWATER

DETENSION AREA

UNAVOIDABLE

WETLAND IMPACTS

WATERS OF THE
U.S. WETLANDS

DOCK LEVEL

OVERHEAD DOOR

GRADE LEVEL

OVERHEAD DOOR

FUTURE DRIVE-IN DOOR

KNOCK OUT
DEVLIN RD. / GREEN ISLAND
RD. WETLAND IMPACT

NEW RAIL SPUR
50' WETLAND BUFFER

ISOLATED

WETLANDS
3940
A01.7

SITE DETAILS
2 DUMPSTER ELEVATIONS

FRONT ELEVATION

SIDE ELEVATION
1 DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE PLAN
DDD
3 TRASH ENCLOSURE WALL SECTION
4 CANE BOLT SECTION
5 SIDE BOLT ELEVATION AT HEAD
6 HINGE ELEVATION, TYP.
7 GATE JAMB

WARNING DOMES AT SITE RAMPS
9 TYPICAL RAMP DETAIL
12 DOUBLE ACCESSIBLE STALLS
VAN
MINIMUM FINE $250
11 SIGN AT ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS
13 ACCESSIBLE SYMBOL AT ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS

INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY
COLOR: WHITE
3'-0" WIDE MIN 3'-0" HIGH MIN
BLUE BACKGROUND COLOR SHALL APPROXIMATE FS 15090
IN FEDERAL STANDARD 595C.

NOTES:

1. THE INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY AND ITS BACKGROUND SHALL HAVE A NON-GLARE FINISH.

2. CHECK W/ THE LOCAL AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION FOR REQUIREMENTS OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN IN THIS DETAIL.
14 BIKE RACK
project number :
scale :
stamp
drawn by :
checked by :
plot date :
approved for the architect by :
approved for the owner by :
sheet no. :

PRELIMINARY DESIGN DOCUMENTS FOR:

CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON, CALIFORNIA
GREEN ISLAND ROAD AT HIGHWAY 29

GIOVANNONI
2204049.00

AS NOTED
RDG/AG 11-11-2020
JDL

A PLANNING SUBMITTAL

INITIAL DESIGN REVIEW
11-11-2020
issue : description : date :
555 CAPITOL MALL SUITE 900
SACRAMENTO, CA 95814
PHONE: 916.379.3800

LOGISTICS CENTER
OWNER / DEVELOPER:

GENERAL CONTRACTOR:
1718 Third Street
Suite 101
Sacramento
California 95811
RMW
Architecture
Interiors
Office
916 449-1400
rmw.com
15 3~
7 WALKWAY PER ~ SITE PLAN

1. GRIND WELDS SMOOTH, TYP.

2. PAIINT EXPOSED STL, TYP U.O.N.

NOTE:
1 1/2" OD PAINTED STL TUBE HOR. /

VERT RAILING, TYP
1 1/2" OD PAINTED STL TUBE POST, THICKNESS
& SPACING AS REQ'D SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS

FOR APPROVAL TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH
CBC 1607A.8.1 REQUIRED DESIGN LOADS.

GUARDRAIL

CURB AS OCCURS, FIELD VERIFY HEIGHT AND
WIDTH. SEE SITE IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR
DETAILS AND MORE INFORMATION.

NOTE: DESIGN SHOWN IS FOR CODE
COMPLIANCE PER 2013 CBC 1013.1.

SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS

FOR FOOTING AND CONNECTION DETAIL

GUARDRAIL SHALL BE DESIGNED FOR
50 plf X 6'-0" POST SPACING = 300 lbs.

M = 300 lbs x 42" = 12,600 lb-in.
18 8
17 TYPICAL FIRE TURN RADIUS
10 NOT USED
3941
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 A
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 B
K
J
I
H
G
F
E
D
C
A
B
K
J
I
H
G
F
E
D
C

PROPOSED ONE STORY
BUILDING "A"
36' CLR. HEIGHT
KEYNOTES:
project number :
scale :
stamp
drawn by :
checked by :
plot date :
approved for the architect by :
approved for the owner by :
sheet no. :

PRELIMINARY DESIGN DOCUMENTS FOR:

CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON, CALIFORNIA
GREEN ISLAND ROAD AT HIGHWAY 29

GIOVANNONI
2204049.00

AS NOTED
RDG/AG 11-11-2020
JDL

A PLANNING SUBMITTAL

INITIAL DESIGN REVIEW
11-11-2020
issue : description : date :
555 CAPITOL MALL SUITE 900
SACRAMENTO, CA 95814
PHONE: 916.379.3800

LOGISTICS CENTER
OWNER / DEVELOPER:

GENERAL CONTRACTOR:
1718 Third Street
Suite 101
Sacramento
California 95811
RMW
Architecture
Interiors
Office
916 449-1400
rmw.com
A02.1

PRELIMINARY

FLOOR PLAN

BUILDING A
1 FLOOR PLAN
1A
A03.1
1B
A03.1
1C
A03.1
1D
A03.1
3942
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
F
K
E
D
C
A
B
H
G
J
I
F
K
E
D
C
A
B
H
G
J
I

PROPOSED ONE STORY
BUILDING "B"
36' CLR. HEIGHT
project number :
scale :
stamp
drawn by :
checked by :
plot date :
approved for the architect by :
approved for the owner by :
sheet no. :

PRELIMINARY DESIGN DOCUMENTS FOR:

CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON, CALIFORNIA
GREEN ISLAND ROAD AT HIGHWAY 29

GIOVANNONI
2204049.00

AS NOTED
RDG/AG 11-11-2020
JDL

A PLANNING SUBMITTAL

INITIAL DESIGN REVIEW
11-11-2020
issue : description : date :
555 CAPITOL MALL SUITE 900
SACRAMENTO, CA 95814
PHONE: 916.379.3800

LOGISTICS CENTER
OWNER / DEVELOPER:

GENERAL CONTRACTOR:
1718 Third Street
Suite 101
Sacramento
California 95811
RMW
Architecture
Interiors
Office
916 449-1400
rmw.com
A02.2

PRELIMINARY

FLOOR PLAN

BUILDING B
1 FLOOR PLAN
KEYNOTES:
1A
A03.2
1B
A03.2
1C
A03.2
1D
A03.2
3943
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 BKJIHGFEDCA BKJIHGFEDC PRIMARY ROOF RIDGE SLOPE 1/4" : 1'-0" MIN. TYP. ALL ROOF AREAS SLOPE 1/4" : 1'-0" MIN. TYP. ALL ROOF AREAS KEYNOTES:
project number :
scale :
stamp
drawn by :
checked by :
plot date :
approved for the architect by :
approved for the owner by :
sheet no. :

PRELIMINARY DESIGN DOCUMENTS FOR:

CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON, CALIFORNIA
GREEN ISLAND ROAD AT HIGHWAY 29

GIOVANNONI
2204049.00

AS NOTED
RDG/AG 11-11-2020

JDL A PLANNING SUBMITTAL

INITIAL DESIGN REVIEW
11-11-2020
issue : description : date :
555 CAPITOL MALL SUITE 900
SACRAMENTO, CA 95814
PHONE: 916.379.3800

LOGISTICS CENTER
OWNER / DEVELOPER:

GENERAL CONTRACTOR:
1718 Third Street
Suite 101
Sacramento
California 95811
RMW
Architecture
Interiors
Office
916 449-1400
rmw.com
A02.7

PRELIMINARY

ROOF PLAN
BUILDING A 1

ROOF PLAN
3944
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 FKEDCABHGJI FKEDCABHGJI PRIMARY ROOF RIDGE SLOPE 1/4" : 1'-0" MIN. TYP. ALL ROOF AREAS SLOPE 1/4" : 1'-0" MIN. TYP. ALL ROOF AREAS KEYNOTES:
project number :
scale :
stamp
drawn by :
checked by :
plot date :
approved for the architect by :
approved for the owner by :
sheet no. :

PRELIMINARY DESIGN DOCUMENTS FOR:

CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON, CALIFORNIA
GREEN ISLAND ROAD AT HIGHWAY 29

GIOVANNONI
2204049.00

AS NOTED
RDG/AG 11-11-2020

JDL A PLANNING SUBMITTAL

INITIAL DESIGN REVIEW
11-11-2020
issue : description : date :
555 CAPITOL MALL SUITE 900
SACRAMENTO, CA 95814
PHONE: 916.379.3800

LOGISTICS CENTER
OWNER / DEVELOPER:

GENERAL CONTRACTOR:
1718 Third Street
Suite 101
Sacramento
California 95811
RMW
Architecture
Interiors
Office
916 449-1400
rmw.com
A02.8

PRELIMINARY

ROOF PLAN
BUILDING B 1

ROOF PLAN
3945
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

K J I H G F E D C B A

A B C D E F G H I J K
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 project number :
scale :
stamp
drawn by :
checked by :
plot date :
approved for the architect by :
approved for the owner by :
sheet no. :

PRELIMINARY DESIGN DOCUMENTS FOR:

CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON, CALIFORNIA
GREEN ISLAND ROAD AT HIGHWAY 29

GIOVANNONI
2204049.00

AS NOTED
RDG/AG 11-11-2020
JDL

A PLANNING SUBMITTAL

INITIAL DESIGN REVIEW
11-11-2020
issue : description : date :
555 CAPITOL MALL SUITE 900
SACRAMENTO, CA 95814
PHONE: 916.379.3800

LOGISTICS CENTER
OWNER / DEVELOPER:

GENERAL CONTRACTOR:
1718 Third Street
Suite 101
Sacramento
California 95811
RMW
Architecture
Interiors
Office
916 449-1400
rmw.com
A03.1

EXTERIOR
ELEVATIONS :

BUILDING A
1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
D: NORTH ELEVATION
C: SOUTH ELEVATION
B: WEST ELEVATION - OVERALL
A: EAST ELEVATION
2 -
2 PARTIAL ENLARGED SOUTH ELEVATION
FINISH LEGEND:

P4: TEXTURED COATING SYSTEM COLOR 4
SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW7661 - REFLECTION
P1: TEXTURED COATING SYSTEM COLOR 1
SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW7757 - HIGH REFLECTIVE WHITE
P3: TEXTURED COATING SYSTEM COLOR 3
SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW7665 - WALL STREET
P5: TEXTURED COATING SYSTEM COLOR 5
SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW7075 - WEB GRAY
GL1 : TYPICAL WINDOW SYSTEM 1" DUAL GLAZED INSULATING UNITS IN

ALUMINUM FRAMES
OUTSIDE PANE: PPG SOLEXIA 1/4" THICK BLUE TINTED GLASS
INSIDE PANE: PPG CLEAR FLOAT 1/4" GLASS
FRAMES: CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMES
P2 : TEXTURED COATING SYSTEM COLOR 2
AT ENTRY. 24" THICK FOAM SURROUND / BAND AT SECOND LEVEL GLAZING SYSTEM.

COLOR: SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW6002 - ESSENTIAL GRAY
SC1: CONCRETE PANELS WITH SIMULATED CAST IN PLACE APPEARANCE CONSISTING OF 3/8" x 3/8" DOUBLE CHAMFER REVEALS AND 3/4" CONE SHAPED DIVOTS. SACK AND PATCH PANELS AND PAINT PER
ARCHITECT'S COLOR SAMPLE.

GL2: SPANDREL GLAZING 1" SINGLE GLAZED IN ALUMINUM FRAMES OUTSIDE PANE: PPG SOLEXIA 1/4" THICK BLUE TINTED GLASS
INSIDE PANE: PPG CLEAR FLOAT 1/4" GLASS
FRAMES: CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMES
KEYNOTES:

P1 SC1 P2 GL2 GL1 P1 P1 P4 P3 GL2 SC1 P3
P1
P4 P1 P3 P4 P4 P1
A: EAST ELEVATION - OVERALL
B: WEST ELEVATION
3946
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

K J I H G F E D C B A

A B C D E F G H I J K
8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
project number :
scale :
stamp
drawn by :
checked by :
plot date :
approved for the architect by :
approved for the owner by :
sheet no. :

PRELIMINARY DESIGN DOCUMENTS FOR:

CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON, CALIFORNIA
GREEN ISLAND ROAD AT HIGHWAY 29

GIOVANNONI
2204049.00

AS NOTED
RDG/AG 11-11-2020
JDL

A PLANNING SUBMITTAL

INITIAL DESIGN REVIEW
11-11-2020
issue : description : date :
555 CAPITOL MALL SUITE 900
SACRAMENTO, CA 95814
PHONE: 916.379.3800

LOGISTICS CENTER
OWNER / DEVELOPER:

GENERAL CONTRACTOR:
1718 Third Street
Suite 101
Sacramento
California 95811
RMW
Architecture
Interiors
Office
916 449-1400
rmw.com
A03.2

EXTERIOR
ELEVATIONS :

BUILDING B
1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
D: EAST ELEVATION
C: SOUTH ELEVATION
B: NORTH ELEVATION - OVERALL
A: SOUTH ELEVATION
2 -
2 PARTIAL ENLARGED SOUTH ELEVATION
FINISH LEGEND:

P1 SC1 P2 GL2 GL1 P1 P1 P4 P3 GL2 SC1 P3
P1
P4 P1 P3 P4 P4 P1
A: SOUTH ELEVATION - OVERALL
B: WEST ELEVATION
3947
Wetlands 50' Wetlands Buffer Line (typ) Wetlands 50' buffer Line Wetlands 50' Buffer Line Bio Retention Detention Pond GREEN ISLAND ROAD

DEVLIN ROAD

SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD

NO TRUCKS

NO TRUCKS NO TRUCKS
STOP
STOP

STOP STOP STOP STOP
STOP
STOP BUILDING A BUILDING B Bio Retention Lagerstroemia f. 'Catawba' Crepe Myrtle Low 24" Box Flowering Accent Tree Pistacia chinensis Chinese Pistache Low 24" Box Deciduous Shade Tree Quercus lobata Valley Oak Low 15 Gallon Deciduous Shade Tree TREES Quercus r. Shumardii Shumard Oak Low 15 Gallon Deciduous Shade Tree PRELIMINARY PLANT LEGEND Ulmus 'Frontier' Frontier Elm Med 15 Gallon Deciduous Shade Tree Quercus suber Cork Oak Low 15 Gallon Evergreen Screen Tree 48 lbs. per acre Pacific Coast Seed Apply Compact Bio Swale Mix via hydroseed at the following rates: Bio Swale Seed Mix 48/lbs/ac Mulch 2000 lbs/ac M-Binder Tackifier 180 lbs/ac Platanus a. 'Columbia' London Plane Tree Low 15 Gallon Deciduous Shade Tree Acer r. 'October Glory' Red Maple Med 15 Gallon Deciduous Shade Tree Sequoia s. 'Aptos Blue' Redwood Med 15 Gallon Evergreen Screen Tree Acer buergeranum Trident Maple Med 15 Gallon Deciduous Shade Tree Grevillea noelli Noel Grevillea Low 5 Gallon 5' OC 5' X 5' Rosemarinus 'Tuscan Blue' Tuscan Rosemary Low 5 Gallon 5' OC 6' X 5' Tulbaghia violacea Society Garlic Low 1 Gallon 2' OC 2' X 2' Ceanothus 'Skylark' California Lilac Low 5 Gallon 5' OC 5' x 5' Xylsoma c. compacta Compact Xylosma Low 5 Gallon 6' OC 6' X 6' Cistus purpureus Purple Rockrose Low 5 Gallon 6' OC 4' x 6' Loropetalum 'Ever Red' Fringe Flower Low 5 Gallon 6' OC 6' X 6' Arctostaphylos 'Sunset' Manzanita Low 5 Gallon 5' OC 5' x 5' FOUNDATION SHRUBS Nandina varieties Heavenly Bamboo Low 5 Gallon 5' OC 5' X 5' Raphiolepis 'Indian Princess' Indian Hawthorne Low 5 Gallon 5' OC 5' X 3' Rosa Carpet varieites Carpet Rose Med 5 Gallon 5' OC 4' X 5' GRASSES & ACCENTS Tulbaghia violacea Society Garlic Low 1 Gallon 2' OC 2' X 2' Pennisetum 'Karley Rose' Fountain Grass Med 1 Gallon 3' OC 3' X 3' Pennisetum s. Cupreum' Red Fountain Grass Low 1 Gallon 4' OC 4' X 4' Muhlebergia capillaris Pink Muhly Grass Low 1 Gallon 4' OC 4' X 5' Coleonema pulchrum Breath of Heaven Med 1 Gallon 4' OC 3' x 4' GROUNDCOVER Cotoneaster dammeri Bearberry Low 1 Gallon 4' OC 1' X 6' Coprosma p. 'Verde Vista' NCN Low 1 Gallon 3' OC 2' X 4' Achillea 'Moonshine' Yarrow Low 1 Gallon 2' OC 2' X 2' Calamagrostis 'Karl Foerster' Feather Reed Grass Low 1 Gallon 3' OC 4' X 3' Juniper c. 'Blue Pacific' Shore Juniper Low 1 Gallon 4' OC 1' X 6' Myoporum 'Pink' NCN Low 1 Gallon 5' OC 1' X 8' COVER Landscape Planters-3" Layer of Recycled Wood mulch in all landscape planters BIO RETENTION TREATMENT Ginkgo 'Princeton Sentry' Maidenhair Tree Low 36" Box Flowering Accent Tree

1. THERE IS APPROXIMATELY 195,250 SQ' OF LANDSCAPE PLANTER AREA. 2. THERE IS 10.4% LANDSCAPE AREA WITHIN THE PARKING AND CIRCULATION AREAS. 3. THERE ARE 430 PARKING STALLS AND 143 SHADE TREES. REQUIREMENT OF 1 TREE PER 3 STALLS SINGLE LOADED AND1 PER 6 STALLS DOUBLE LOADED HAS BEEN MET. BUILDING A PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE NOTES1. THERE IS APPROXIMATELY 186,547 SQ' OF LANDSCAPE PLANTER AREA. 2. THERE IS 11.3% LANDSCAPE AREA WITHIN THE PARKING AND CIRCULATION AREAS. 3. THERE ARE 430 PARKING STALLS AND 139 SHADE TREES. REQUIREMENT OF 1 TREE PER 3 STALLS SINGLE LOADED AND1 PER 6 STALLS DOUBLE LOADED HAS BEEN MET. BUILDING B PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE NOTES WELO NOTES 1. ALL PLANTS AND TREES ARE WUCULS LOW OR MEDIUM WATER VARIETIES. 2. SOIL AMENDMENTS WILL BE INCORPORATED PER SOILS TEST. COMPOST WILL BE ORGANIC COMPOSTED GREEN WASTE. 3. ALL PLANTER AREAS SHALL BE TREATED WITH A 3" LAYER OF RECYCLED MULCH. 4. A FULLY AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM THAT MEETS THE CURRENT WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE INSTALLED INCLUDING THE FOLLOWING: 5. AN ET (SMART) CONTROLLER AND ET SENSOR SHALL BE USED FOR WEATHER BASED IRRIGATION CONTROL. 6. A MASTER VALVE AND FLOW SENSOR SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE SYSTEM. 7. ALL PLANTER AREAS SHALL BE IRRIGATED WITH POINT SOURCE-DRIP IRRIGATION. 8. TREES SHALL RECEIVE DEEP WATER BUBBLERS ON SEPARATE VALVES. 9. WELO DOCUMENTATION SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT PLANS (CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS). Scale 1" = 100' 100 0 100 200 300 LP PRELIMINARY PLANTING PLAN project number : scale : stamp drawn by : checked by : plot date :
approved for the architect by :approved for the owner by : sheet no. : PRELIMINARY DESIGN DOCUMENTS FOR: CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON, CALIFORNIA GREEN ISLAND ROAD AT HIGHWAY 29 GIOVANNONI issue : description : date : 555 CAPITOL MALL SUITE 900 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 PHONE: 916.379.3800 LOGISTICS CENTER OWNER / DEVELOPER: 2204049.00 AS NOTED EJD 11-11-2020 JN A PLANNING SUBMITTAL INITIAL DESIGN REVIEW 11-11-2020 VISTA PARKS design /build /construction WELO WORKSHEETS 3948
NO
Date:11/13/2020
Drawing:

DATE ISSUE
PROJECT:

RENDERS:

DISCLAIMER:

THE ENGINEER AND/OR ARCHITECT MUST DETERMINE APPLICABILITY OF THE LAYOUT TO EXISTING / FUTURE FIELD CONDITIONS. THIS LIGHTING LAYOUT REPRESENTS ILLUMINATION LEVELS CALCULATED FROM LABORATORY DATATAKEN UNDER CONTROLLED CONDITIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ILLUMINATING ENGINEERING SOCIETY (IESNA)APPROVED METHODS. ADDITIONALLY, THE PREPARER USED INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE CUSTOMER. IF/WHENSUFFICIENT INFORMATION WAS NOT PROVIDED, PREPARER USED EDUCATED ASSUMPTIONS. ACTUAL PERFORMANCE OFANY MANUFACTURER'S LUMINAIRE(S) MAY VARY DUE TO VARIATION IN ELECTRICAL VOLTAGE, TOLERANCE IN LAMPS,AND OTHER FIELD CONDITIONS NOT ACOCUNTED FOR IN THIS PHOTOMETRIC ANALYSIS.THESE LIGHTING CALCULATIONS ARE NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR INDEPENDENT ENGINEERING ANALYSIS OF LIGHTINGSYSTEM SUITABILITY AND SAFETY. THE ENGINEER AND/OR ARCHITECT IS RESPONSIBLE TO REVIEW FOR ENERGY CODEAND RELEVANT LIGHTING QUALITY COMPLIANCE.SUMMARY TABLES & PARAMETERS:

Giovannoni Logistics Center - Rev1
Fixture/Pole 25' AFF / 8' MTG FOR DOORWAY FIXTURE>>Wall Mts/ 48' 7" / 43' 1" / 22' 6".5 Surface Reflectance >>> Calcs 15' Centers @ Grade>> PH1.0 Title Sheet Luminaire Schedule
Calculation SummaryLabel CalcType Units Avg Max Min
Symbol Qty Label LLF
Avg/Min Max/Min
SITE CALCS Illuminance
Description Lum. Watts Lum. Lumens
Fc 2.85
5 S1A 0.900 PRV-XL-PA3B-740-U-T3-SINGLE @ 25' MTG. HT. 234

65.1 0.1 28.50 651.00
Building A East Dock Illuminance Fc
30527

4.50 5.7 3.4 1.32 1.68
Building A North Parking Illuminance Fc 2.51 5.6
39 S1B 0.900 PRV-XL-PA3B-740-U-T4W-SINGLE @ 25' MTG. HT. 234 30161

1.5 1.67 3.73
Building A West Trailer Illuminance Fc 2.73 5.7 1.4 1.95 4.07 3 S2
Building B North Trailer Illuminance

0.900 PRV-XL-PA3A-740-U-5WQ-TWIN @ 25' MTG. HT.

Fc 2.43 4.8 1.3 1.87 3.69
Building B South Dock Illuminance
172 25453
Fc 4.64
Building B West Parking Illuminance Fc 2.67 5.1 1.6 1.67 3.19 40 WM-2 0.900 TBLW-13-LED-O2B-4-Z3-CEG WALL MT @ 8' MTG. HT. EMERG 15 232841 WM-3 0.900 PRV-PA2B-740-U-T4W-WALL MT @ 48' 7in MTG. HT. 151 1943187 WM-4 0.900 PRV-XL-PA3B-740-U-T4W-WALL MT @ 43' 1in MTG. HT. 234 30161

5.4 3.5 1.33 1.54
N
O
T
R
U
C
K
S
N
O
T
R
U
C
K
S
S
T
O
P
S
T
O
P

SKCURT ON
STOP
STOP
POTS
S
T
O
P
S
T
O
P
S
T
O
P

GREEN ISLAND ROAD
D
E
V
L
N
I
R
O
A
D
WM-3MH: 48.583
WM-3MH: 48.583
WM-3MH: 48.583
WM-3MH: 48.583
WM-3MH: 48.583WM-3MH: 48.583WM-3MH: 48.583
WM-3MH: 48.583WM-3MH: 48.583
MH: 48.583WM-3
WM-3MH: 48.583
WM-4MH: 43.083 WM-4
MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083 MH: 43.083
WM-4 WM-4
MH: 43.083 MH: 43.083
WM-4 WM-4
MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083 MH: 43.083
WM-4 WM-4
MH: 43.083
S1BMH: 25 MH: 25
S1B
MH: 25S1B
MH: 25S1B
MH: 25
S1B S1B
MH: 25
MH: 25S1B S1B
MH: 25 MH: 25
S1B
MH: 25S1B
MH: 25S1B S1B
MH: 25
MH: 8WM-2 WM-4
MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-2MH: 8
WM-4
MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-2MH: 8
WM-2
MH: 8
WM-2MH: 8 MH: 8
WM-2 WM-2
MH: 8 MH: 8
WM-2
WM-2MH: 8
WM-2MH: 8
WM-4MH: 48.583
WM-2MH: 8
S2MH: 25
MH: 25S1A
MH: 25S1A
MH: 43.083WM-4 WM-4
MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083 MH: 43.083
WM-4
MH: 43.083WM-4 WM-4
MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083 MH: 43.083
WM-4
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-3MH: 48.583
MH: 48.583WM-3
WM-3MH: 48.583
WM-3MH: 48.583
WM-3MH: 48.583
WM-3MH: 48.583
MH: 48.583WM-3
WM-3MH: 48.583
WM-3MH: 48.583WM-3MH: 48.583
WM-4MH: 43.083
MH: 25S2
MH: 25S1B
MH: 43.083WM-4
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
MH: 43.083WM-4
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
MH: 43.083WM-4
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
MH: 43.083WM-4WM-4MH: 43.083
MH: 43.083WM-4
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-2MH: 8
MH: 8WM-2
WM-2MH: 8
WM-2MH: 8
WM-2MH: 8
WM-2MH: 8
WM-2MH: 8
WM-2MH: 8
MH: 8WM-2
WM-2MH: 8
WM-2MH: 8
MH: 25S1A
S1AMH: 25
S1BMH: 25
WM-3MH: 48.583
WM-3MH: 48.583
WM-3MH: 48.583
WM-3MH: 48.583
WM-3MH: 48.583 MH: 48.583
WM-3
WM-3MH: 48.583 MH: 48.583
WM-3 WM-3
MH: 48.583 MH: 48.583
WM-3 WM-2
MH: 8 MH: 8WM-2
WM-2MH: 8 MH: 8
WM-2
S1AMH: 25
MH: 43.083WM-4
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
MH: 43.083WM-4
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
MH: 43.083WM-4
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
MH: 43.083WM-4
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
MH: 8WM-2
WM-2MH: 8
MH: 8WM-2
WM-2MH: 8
WM-2MH: 8
WM-2MH: 8
MH: 8WM-2
MH: 8WM-2
WM-4MH: 43.083
MH: 8WM-2
WM-2MH: 8
MH: 8WM-2
WM-3MH: 48.583
WM-3MH: 48.583 MH: 48.583
WM-3 WM-3
MH: 48.583 WM-3
MH: 48.583
WM-3MH: 48.583
WM-3MH: 48.583 MH: 48.583
WM-3 WM-3
MH: 48.583 MH: 48.583
WM-2 WM-3MH: 8
WM-2MH: 8
WM-2MH: 8
MH: 25S2
S1BMH: 25 MH: 25
S1B
MH: 25S1B
S1BMH: 25
MH: 25S1B
MH: 25S1B
MH: 25S1B
MH: 25S1B
MH: 25S1B
MH: 25S1B
S1BMH: 25
MH: 25
S1B
MH: 25S1B
MH: 25S1B
S1BMH: 25
MH: 25
S1B
MH: 25S1B
MH: 25S1B
S1BMH: 25MH: 25S1BMH: 25S1B
S1BMH: 25MH: 25S1BMH: 25S1BMH: 25S1B

0.6 5.4 5.5 4.7 4.3 3.6 2.9 2.3 2.0 2.1 2.42.3

0.2 1.0 1.3 1.8 2.3 3.1 3.8 4.5 4.7 5.4

4.5 5.1

3.0 4.6 5.4 5.4 5.5 5.1 4.7 4.3 3.6 3.0 2.4

2.7 3.8

3.0 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 1.0 1.3 1.8 2.3

0.5 4.5

2.0 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 1.0

4.3 4.5

0.8 2.8

2.3 5.7 8.0 4.9 4.6 4.1 3.5 2.8 2.2 1.9

4.0 4.1

4.2 0.3 0.4 0.5

1.3 1.8 3.1 3.8 4.4 4.7 5.4 8.9 5.7 5.2 4.7 3.6 2.3 2.0 2.0 2.7 3.3 3.2 3.3

1.9 2.9

1.3 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.3 1.7 2.3

2.1 1.0

4.3 5.0 4.6 4.2 3.6 3.0 2.5 2.1 1.9 1.6 1.4

0.5 2.5

0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8

3.0 3.7 4.5 5.1 5.3 6.0 5.0 4.5 4.2 3.6 3.0 2.1 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.3

5.2 1.9

1.0 5.3

0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.7 1.3 2.3 3.1 3.8 4.4 4.7 5.4 5.3 5.5 5.2 4.3 3.6

1.9 1.9 2.0

4.3 1.7

0.4 2.0

0.8 1.0 1.3 1.7 2.3 3.1 3.7 4.4 4.7

4.7 0.3 0.3 0.5 5.2

3.0 2.4 2.1 1.9 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.2

0.6 2.7

5.2 4.6 2.9 1.5

3.1 2.1 1.5 1.3 1.2 1.1 0.9

1.0 4.4 4.7 5.4 5.2 5.2 4.8 4.4 3.9 3.3

5.1 1.8

1.0 0.9 1.3 1.8 2.4 3.1 3.8 4.5 4.7 5.3 4.9 5.3 4.8 4.0 3.3 2.7 2.1 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.7

2.4 4.5

3.0 1.5 1.1 0.9 1.1 1.4 1.9 2.5 3.2 3.8

3.8 2.6 5.2

3.2 2.6 2.0 1.6 1.2 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.4

4.0 2.3 1.1

4.1 3.7 2.8 1.6 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.4 1.8

4.3 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.2 3.9 3.3 2.6 2.1 1.7 1.3 0.9 0.5

2.6 0.7

1.0 1.3 1.8 2.4 3.1 3.8 4.4 4.6 5.1 5.1

3.42.0 1.6 1.4 1.2 0.9 4.5

1.9 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.1 3.2

1.0 4.3

1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.3 1.8 2.4 3.1 3.8

5.3 1.2

4.8 4.1 3.5 2.8 2.2 1.9 1.9 2.8 4.0 4.0

3.4 1.0

4.5 2.2

1.6 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.3 1.8 2.4 3.1 3.8 4.6 5.0 5.3 4.9 4.6 4.1 3.4 2.7 2.1 1.9 2.1 2.2

1.7 5.3

1.8 3.2

3.8 4.4 4.7 5.4 5.0 5.4 5.0 4.6 4.1

1.9 2.8 2.3 2.0 1.4 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.3 2.4 2.8

2.5 2.8

3.1 2.1 1.9 2.1 2.4 3.0 3.7 4.4 4.7 5.2 5.5

2.5 1.1 1.0 1.1 2.2 1.9 4.7

1.9 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.1

1.01.8 1.1

1.0 3.1 2.7 2.4 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.4 3.0 3.7

5.3 0.7

5.3 4.4 3.7 3.1 2.5 2.2 1.9 1.7 1.5 1.3

3.1 0.8

4.7 13.1 5.4 4.7 4.4 3.7 3.1 2.5 2.2 2.0

2.2 1.7 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.5 1.9 2.4 3.0 3.7 4.3 5.4 33.3 1.7

2.0 3.7 4.4 4.7 5.3 5.6 5.3 5.3 4.7 4.4 3.7

1.8 2.4

1.7 1.9 1.5 1.5 1.8 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.7

1.7 5.4

3.0 5.2 4.3 3.7 3.1 2.5 2.1 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.0

4.3 5.1

4.3 2.9 2.1 2.1 2.4 3.0 3.6 4.2 4.5 5.0 5.3 4.6

5.5 0.6

4.7 4.4 3.7 3.1 2.4 2.0 2.0 2.7 3.6

3.4 4.6 3.0 2.1 2.1 2.4 3.0 3.6 4.3 4.7 5.2 5.3

4.4 5.4

2.0 4.0

0.5 0.6 1.0 3.5 3.3 3.1 2.7

1.6 1.6

2.1 1.8

2.4 5.5 5.2 5.2 4.7 4.3 3.7 3.1 2.5 2.2

2.8 1.7

3.7 4.7

0.5 0.6 1.8

2.2 3.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.6

3.9 3.0 3.6 4.3 4.6 5.1 5.3 5.1 5.0 4.5 4.3 2.53.0 4.7 5.3 5.4 5.4 5.2 4.7 4.4 3.6 3.0

4.7 2.6 2.1 1.7 1.4 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.3 1.7 2.3 3.7 4.5 2.0

0.9 1.9

1.7 2.3 3.0 3.7 4.4 4.7 5.3 5.4 5.4

2.4 1.0

2.0 3.0 2.8 2.5 1.6 1.0

2.7 3.4 3.3 3.5

2.5 1.3

4.7 1.7 3.2

3.0 2.4 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.2

1.2 4.3

1.1 2.3 3.0 3.7 4.3 4.6 5.2 63.5 6.6 5.2

4.2 3.6

5.4 4.3

1.4 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.3 1.7 2.3 3.0 3.7 4.4 4.8 5.4 5.4 5.2 4.7 4.3 3.7 3.0 2.4 2.1 2.1 2.3 2.8

2.4 3.1 3.0 2.6 1.7 1.2

2.5 3.0 3.1 3.3

5.3 2.1

1.4 4.3 4.5 5.1 5.3 5.2 5.0 4.5 4.3 3.7 3.0 2.1

5.1 1.3

1.0 1.1 1.8 2.4 3.0 3.7 4.3 4.6 5.1 5.4 5.5 4.7 3.7 3.0 2.4 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.4 2.8

2.3 4.3

4.1 3.7

4.6 3.0 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.3 1.7 2.3 3.0 3.7 4.3 5.3 5.3

3.7 3.0 2.3 2.0 2.0 2.8 4.1 4.3 4.6

1.7 3.8

2.2 4.9 4.4 3.0 1.7 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.3 1.8

4.7 3.7

3.0 5.3 5.1 4.6 4.3 3.7 3.0 2.4 2.0 2.0 2.8 4.3

5.5 2.6 2.0 1.9 2.0 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2

2.5 2.7 5.4 5.2 2.4

3.5 5.2 5.1 4.5 1.4 0.7 0.53.4

3.3 2.3 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.1

2.3 2.2

4.0 5.0 5.7 5.7 3.3 2.9 2.7 2.8 2.6 2.3 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.2 2.5 3.0 2.6

5.1 5.7 2.2 0.7 0.5

3.7 2.7 2.8 3.0 3.0 2.7 2.4 2.1 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.5 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.6 2.3 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.3 2.5 2.6 2.5 2.5

1.9 2.8

0.5 3.5 3.3 2.9 2.7 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1

2.0 1.6 2.3

1.8 1.8 2.1 2.8 3.1 3.3 3.3 2.9 1.1 0.7

3.4 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.3

2.1 2.2

1.8 4.7 4.3 3.1 2.5 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.3 1.9

2.4 2.7 3.3 4.0 4.2 3.6 1.1 0.7 0.5

2.5 4.7 2.1

1.9 2.2 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.0

3.5 1.4 1.4 2.0 3.0 3.6 4.5 5.4 4.0 3.6

0.3 0.9 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.3 3.8 3.9 5.2 4.4 3.0 1.4

5.8 2.0 2.7 1.8 1.6 2.3 3.3 3.6 5.1 5.2 3.6 3.3 2.4 1.7 1.4 2.5 3.3 3.8 5.6 4.5 3.4 3.0 2.5 2.8 4.0

0.6 1.8

1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.2 1.5 3.4 2.1 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.1 2.1 3.6 1.6 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.4 1.5 3.4 3.5 1.6 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.8 1.0 1.3 2.0 4.1 2.8 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.9 2.4 2.6 2.4 0.2

0.8 1.5

3.6 3.1 2.4 2.0 1.8 1.8 2.0 2.5 3.2 4.0

4.1 1.9 4.8 5.4 4.8 3.4 3.1 4.1 2.9

5.2 1.7 0.6 0.4

3.8 4.3 3.8 2.3 2.0 1.9 1.9 2.2 2.6 3.4 4.0 4.0 3.5 2.7 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.3 2.8 3.4 3.7 3.5 2.9 2.5

3.2 2.2

1.3 3.8 3.9 3.7 3.3 3.4 3.6 4.5 3.8 2.6 1.9 1.6 1.7 2.0 2.6 3.3 3.9 4.7 3.2 2.4 4.7

0.5 0.3

2.1 3.2 2.2

3.6 3.7 1.9 1.7 1.8 2.2 2.8 3.5 4.7 4.7 3.5 2.9 1.8 1.7 1.8 2.3 2.9 3.7 5.0 4.1 3.1 2.6 2.4 5.3

5.8 3.2 2.9 3.4 3.0 2.6 2.2 1.8 1.0 0.6

0.6 3.9

0.5 1.2 1.6 2.1 2.9 3.8 4.8 4.8 5.0

0.3 2.2

3.4 4.5 3.3 3.2 3.3 3.3 2.8 2.3 1.8 1.4 0.9 0.6

0.4 5.2

0.3 0.7 0.9 1.2 1.6 2.1 2.8 3.7 4.6 4.4

1.1 4.7

2.8 4.7 4.7 5.5 3.6 3.3 3.2 2.7 3.5 3.6

0.4 1.3 1.8 2.3 3.6 3.4

5.5 5.4 4.5 1.4 0.8 0.5 0.3

4.54.8 6.4 4.0 3.6 3.3 2.8 3.5 3.3 3.1 2.9 2.4

3.9 5.0

4.0 1.3 1.7 2.2 2.8 3.7

1.2 0.7 0.4 0.3

0.7 5.4

1.5 3.3 3.9 4.4 4.7 5.5 4.7 4.2 4.0 3.6

0.4 1.5 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.9 2.0

0.6 0.4 0.3

2.6 1.3 1.1 1.4 1.9 2.5 3.2 3.9 4.3 4.5 5.3 6.9

3.2 1.1

2.6 2.3 1.9 1.6

1.5 1.2 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.31.6

1.0 4.5

0.8 0.8 0.9 1.2 1.5 2.0 2.7 3.6 4.3 4.2 5.0 3.7 3.5 3.4 3.2 2.7 2.1 1.6 1.2 0.9 0.4 0.3

1.6 4.1

3.4 0.3

4.7 5.4 4.7 4.2 3.9 3.5 3.2 2.6 2.0

0.6 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.5 2.0 2.6 4.0 4.4 1.2

3.7 1.5 2.2 2.4 2.5 2.7 2.8

0.8 0.5 0.4

2.5 3.2

2.0 2.1 2.2 2.1 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 3.0 3.3 3.6 1.3

2.5 4.2

1.9 1.9 2.2 2.5 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.6 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.2 2.2 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.5

2.3 2.3

1.2 1.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.7 2.7 1.7 1.7 2.2

0.4 2.0

0.7 2.1

1.9 1.8 1.8 2.2 2.9 3.1 3.2 3.2 2.7

4.5 0.5

2.2 2.5

1.8 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.4

0.4 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.7 2.7 3.9 6.7 5.8 6.1

2.7 1.3 0.5

2.3 0.9 2.3 3.9 6.0 5.9 5.2 1.8 0.9 0.6

1.4 6.5

2.2 1.3 1.9 2.5 2.4 2.2

2.1 0.8 0.5 0.32.5

5.9 0.8

1.3 1.5 1.9 2.0 2.2 1.8 3.1 4.0

0.2 2.3

6.0 3.2

1.5 2.1 2.4 5.7

4.9 4.2 1.5 0.9 0.6 0.4

2.7 3.7

2.9 2.6 2.6 2.4 2.4 2.7 2.4 2.1 1.9 2.0 2.0 4.6

2.5 2.8

2.4 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.3 25.7 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.5 3.6 3.8 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.2 2.2 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.8

4.1 3.6 3.3 2.8 3.0 3.6 4.2 5.1 5.0 3.7 2.6 1.9 1.3 1.1 1.9 4.4 4.5 4.4 3.2 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.9 4.5 2.1

4.2 4.0 4.1 3.1 2.2 2.0 1.9

4.5 4.6 4.6 4.7 4.6 4.5 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.6 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.6 4.6 4.7 4.7 4.6 3.6 3.6 3.5 4.2 4.8 5.3 5.0 5.1 4.6 4.4 3.8 3.2 2.5 2.0 2.6 3.7 4.0 4.6

3.7 4.5 4.7 4.7 4.5 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.6 4.7 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.3 4.1 4.2 4.0

2.0 4.7

1.8 3.4 3.8 3.8 3.8 4.1 4.5 4.4 4.5 4.9 4.9 4.9 5.0 4.8 5.1 5.2 5.1 5.2 5.1 4.9 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.4 5.3 5.3 4.9 4.7 4.9 4.6 4.2 4.1 4.1 3.7 2.9 2.9 3.3 3.7 3.8 3.6 3.1 2.3 1.7 1.3 1.0 1.0 2.9 3.3 3.2 2.9 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.9 3.5 4.2 4.6 4.9 5.3 5.0 5.3 4.7 4.5 3.8 3.2 2.5 2.1 2.0 2.6 3.8 4.3 4.9

4.2 2.0 5.1 5.3 5.3 5.0 5.0 5.3 5.2 5.2 5.4 5.1 5.0 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.4 5.2 5.0 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.3 5.3 5.0 5.1 5.3

3.0 3.4 2.9 2.3 2.1 2.3 2.9 3.6 4.3 4.8 5.2 6.3 5.5 4.8 4.5 3.8 3.2 2.5 2.2 2.1 2.2 3.0

4.2 5.2

1.7 3.2 3.4 3.5 3.8 3.9 3.9 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.2

2.3 2.8

2.5 3.9 3.8 4.1 3.4 2.6 2.5 2.2 2.1 2.0

1.0 3.0

3.7 3.7 3.7 3.8 3.8 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.4

3.5 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.8 3.8 3.7 3.5 1.5 1.6 3.9 4.7 4.7 5.6 5.5 3.9 3.2 2.2 1.3 0.9

4.2 3.4

4.2 3.7 3.0 2.1 1.5 1.0 2.0 4.6 4.7 4.6 3.2 2.2 2.0 2.3 2.9 3.6 4.2 4.7 5.1 5.5 5.0 5.2 4.6 3.2

4.5 1.9 1.9 1.8 2.0 1.8 3.1 3.5 3.6 3.7 4.0

4.4 3.1

3.8 4.8 4.9

4.3 2.5 2.1 2.1 2.5 3.0 3.1 3.3

2.1 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.2 4.3 4.3 4.4 4.4 4.3 4.3 4.4 4.4 4.5 4.4 4.3 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.5 4.4 4.3 5.2

3.2 4.2 4.3 4.5 4.4 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.5 4.5 4.3 4.2 4.0 4.0 3.9 3.6 3.5 3.4 3.2 2.9 3.2 3.9 5.1

2.7 3.3 3.6 2.0 0.8 0.7 1.3 1.8 1.7 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.9 3.5 4.1 4.6 4.9 5.4 5.2 4.6 4.4 2.7

3.3 2.4

2.3 2.5 2.4 2.7 2.5 2.7 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.8

3.9 2.4

3.3 1.8 2.1 2.1

2.4 2.3 2.0 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.1

2.5 1.5 2.1 2.4 2.9 3.6 4.2 4.8 5.1 6.6 5.4

3.1 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.9 1.8 0.6 0.6 1.1 1.4 1.7 1.9 3.9

1.7 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.6 2.5 2.8 2.5 2.4 2.3

4.7 1.9

4.5 1.3

3.3 2.7 2.3 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.5 1.4

4.6 2.1

4.1 5.5 5.6 4.8 4.6 3.9 3.3 2.6 2.2 2.1

3.8 0.6 2.0 3.2 2.8 2.7 2.3 2.2 2.3 2.9 3.5 4.7 5.1 2.0

2.6 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.4 2.8 3.7 4.1 4.2 2.7 1.2

2.0 2.6

1.9 3.4 3.5 3.3 3.1 2.6 2.4 2.4 2.3

6.0 2.3

2.9 2.4

1.6 3.1 1.2 0.7 1.8 2.5 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.9 4.1 4.5 4.8 5.3 5.2 4.6 4.5 3.9 3.3 2.3 2.0

2.4 3.5

2.5 4.4

2.6 2.7 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.8 3.9 5.3

2.7 2.9 2.8 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.5 2.3 4.7

1.8 1.6 1.5 1.4

2.6 1.2 2.6 2.8 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.9 3.6

2.4 5.0 3.0 3.0 3.1 3.0 2.7 2.5 2.3 2.0 1.6 0.9 0.8 5.1 2.1

2.3 2.8 2.7 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.2

2.9 2.4 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.2 2.2 3.6 4.0 4.1 4.2 5.0 4.9 5.0 5.3 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.4 5.3 5.5 5.5 5.3 5.2 4.2 4.8 5.6 5.0 5.5 4.7 4.5 3.9 3.2 2.5 2.1 2.6 3.2 3.2 3.4

3.7 4.5 5.4

2.3 5.4 5.5 5.4 5.2 5.3 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.4 5.3 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.5 5.4 5.3 5.2 5.2 5.3 5.2 5.3 5.2 5.3

1.2 1.7 1.9 2.1 2.4 2.9 3.5 4.2 4.8 5.0

2.2 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.1 2.0 2.1 1.4 0.7 0.7 1.5 1.6 4.8 2.2

3.3 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.5 2.5 2.7

5.7 1.3

2.4 5.6 4.6 3.9 3.2 2.6 2.2 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.9

1.7 0.8

2.4 2.9 2.7 2.7 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.9 1.7 1.2 0.7 1.8 2.0 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.9 3.5 4.2 5.0 5.6 2.4

2.4 1.8 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.5

4.8 2.7

2.7 5.1 5.5 4.7 4.6 3.9 3.2 2.6 2.2 2.1 2.3 3.2

1.7 2.3 2.8 3.0 2.9 2.7 2.3 1.9 1.7 1.7 1.8 2.0 2.8 2.9 2.8 2.5 2.1 1.9 1.7 1.7 1.9 2.7

3.3 1.7 2.4 2.2 2.5 2.7 2.7 2.4 2.0 1.8 1.7 1.8 2.0 2.3 2.6 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.4 1.6 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.5 3.0 3.7

3.7 5.3 5.5 5.2 5.4 4.7 4.4 3.8 3.1 2.5

1.9 3.9 3.3 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.4 3.0 4.3 2.4

3.7 4.8

2.2 1.6 1.8 2.2 2.7 3.0 3.1 2.9 2.4 2.0 1.7

2.1 1.8

2.1 0.6 3.3 3.6 3.6 3.3 2.8

2.6 2.9 3.3

1.6 5.1

2.1 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1

4.3 1.9 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.1 2.0 2.0 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.4 2.4 2.3 1.9 1.4 1.5 1.7 1.9 2.2 2.5 3.0

2.1 1.3 2.4 3.8 4.9 5.1 5.7 5.4 2.0

2.2 2.5

5.1 2.0

6.0 5.4 5.1 5.1 4.6 4.4 3.8 3.1 2.5 2.2

2.5 2.0

2.0 4.7

5.0 6.5 5.8 6.1 5.2 4.2 3.3 2.7 2.5 2.4 2.2 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.0 1.9

3.2 4.0 3.2 2.5 1.8 1.4 1.4 1.8 2.5 3.1

4.7 3.8 3.4

3.7 3.1 2.4 2.1 2.0 2.7 4.0 4.4 5.1

3.9 5.4 4.0 4.8 2.9 2.1 1.5 1.3 1.5 1.9 2.7 3.2 4.3 4.1 3.2 1.9 1.4 1.3 1.6 2.2 2.9 3.4 4.5 3.6 3.0

5.4 2.6

4.4 3.2 2.8 1.8 1.1 1.0 1.4 2.4 3.3 3.8 4.8 4.0 3.3 2.6 1.6 1.1 1.2 1.8 2.8 3.4 4.3 4.9 3.6 3.3 2.3 1.5 1.1 1.4 2.2 3.2 3.5 5.0 4.8 3.4 3.4 3.5 2.1 2.1 2.4 3.0 3.7 4.3 4.7 5.3 8.7 65.1 4.5

1.4 2.8

2.0 1.5 1.9 2.4 3.3 4.2 4.1 3.2 2.3 1.8

2.3 4.1 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.7 2.2 3.0 4.1 4.5 3.5 2.6 1.6 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.6 2.0 2.6 3.6 4.2 3.8 2.8 2.1 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.7 2.2 2.9 3.7 4.0 3.4 2.5 2.0 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.9

1.6 2.3

1.4 1.7 2.4 3.0 3.7 4.3 3.3 2.8 2.1 1.4 2.0 2.7 3.3 4.4 4.3 3.2 2.9 2.6 2.4 2.1 2.4

4.5 1.7 1.5 3.8

2.9 3.9 4.8

2.1 3.1 2.1 2.1 2.7 3.5 3.4 3.8

3.0 3.0 3.7 4.4 4.7 5.2 5.9 5.3 5.3 4.7 4.5 2.4

3.5 3.7 3.7 3.6 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.9 3.1 3.4 3.6 3.3 3.0 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9

3.6 3.3 3.1 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1

1.8 1.3 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.5 1.8 2.1

3.6 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.2 2.0 1.7 1.5 2.1 5.4

1.2 1.9 2.0 2.2 2.4 3.0 3.6 4.3 4.8 5.2 5.6 5.2 4.7 3.8 3.2 2.6 2.2 2.0 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.2

3.2 4.5

1.8 3.7 3.4 3.3 3.0 2.8 2.9 2.8 3.0 3.2

3.1 1.9

2.5 5.4 4.7 4.5 3.8 3.2 2.6 2.2 2.0 1.9 1.8

3.7 2.2 2.4 3.3 3.3 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.7 3.7 3.6 3.6 3.7

5.1 3.5

3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.1 3.0 2.9 3.0 2.2 2.2 2.6 47.5

2.6 3.2 3.2 1.9 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.9 3.1 1.5 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.6 2.6 2.9 2.5 2.4 2.2 2.1 2.4 2.9 3.6 4.3 4.7 6.2

2.2 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.1 1.0

2.5 2.1 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.5 2.6 2.1 2.4 2.0 1.7 1.5 1.3

2.2 1.4 2.5 3.8 5.5 5.9 5.9 2.2

1.6 1.6 1.5

4.8 2.0

4.9 4.9 5.3 5.1 5.1 4.5 4.4 3.8 3.2 2.6

1.2 1.8

5.6 6.1 6.7 6.4 6.5 5.0 3.8 3.0 2.5 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.2 0.9

2.4 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.5

1.2 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.6

4.2 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.6

2.2 2.4

0.7 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 1.2 1.6 1.6 1.7 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.6 4.2 4.7 5.1 5.4 5.1 5.4 4.7 4.4 3.2 2.6

5.7 4.3 4.4 5.3 6.2 5.9 5.3 4.5 3.5 2.9 2.6

3.8 1.3 2.7 3.8 4.9 5.6 2.4

2.2 2.0 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.1

5.0 2.9

3.3 3.2 3.0 2.9 2.6

2.4 2.1

1.1 2.2

2.3 0.7 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.9 2.3 2.5 2.5

2.8 5.7

2.4 2.4 2.4 2.6 2.6 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.4 3.7 4.0 2.5 1.0 0.7 0.6 0.7

0.7 4.0

3.6 0.6

2.4 2.8 2.4 2.2 2.1 1.9

2.4 3.2

2.4 1.9 2.2 2.4 2.9 2.4 3.1 3.3 3.8 3.1

2.4 1.5

2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.7 3.0 3.1 3.4 2.0 0.6

3.6 2.4 2.4 2.6 2.7 4.8 4.8 5.0

0.8 5.0 5.1 4.9 2.6 5.2

1.9 1.8 1.9 1.5

2.4 5.2 5.2 32.1 5.3 5.2 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.2 8.5 5.9 5.4 5.4 5.2 5.2 5.9 7.1 5.3

2.1 5.4

3.8 3.8 3.3 2.6 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.5 2.6 2.4 1.9

1.9 2.4 2.1 2.4 2.2 2.0 2.1 1.7

3.9 1.5

1.2 2.6 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.8 3.9 5.3 5.8 4.6 0.8 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.5 1.7 2.1 2.3

2.1 2.5 2.3 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.5 2.4

1.7 1.5 1.8 1.9 2.3 2.3

2.4 2.1 2.0 2.5

2.4 2.5 2.4 2.1 1.9 1.7 1.1 0.6 0.5 1.2 2.5 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.1 2.5 3.0 3.1 3.1

3.1 2.0

2.3 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.6 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.3 2.1 1.9 1.3 3.0

4.0 2.7 2.1

3.8 2.0 0.7 0.6 1.5 3.3 2.9 2.6 2.3 2.1 2.4 3.0 3.2 3.2 3.3 3.8 4.1 3.2 3.5

3.0 2.9

1.6 1.9 2.0 2.2

2.1 2.2

2.4 2.4

2.5 3.2 3.4 3.9 4.0 3.5 3.2 3.0

3.2 2.2

2.5 4.8

2.3 2.5 2.7 1.6 0.6 0.5 0.7 1.0

2.5 2.4 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.5

2.4 1.2 1.8 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.3 2.6 2.7 3.0

3.3 3.1 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.1 2.1

1.4 1.6 2.5 1.2 0.6 0.9 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.1

3.8 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.2 2.0 2.0 0.5

4.5 4.7 4.7 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.7 4.7

2.4 3.3 3.5 3.8 3.9 4.1 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.6 4.6 4.7 4.6 4.6 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.6 4.5 4.7 4.7 4.6 4.6 4.4 4.1 4.2 4.1 3.8 3.6 3.5

1.8 4.1 4.1 3.9 3.3 3.0 2.9 2.6 3.3

1.7 2.5

2.4 2.1 1.9 1.9 1.6 2.3 2.0

5.3 3.9 2.6 3.0 3.5 3.7 3.6 3.8 4.2 4.2 4.1 4.4 4.5 4.3 4.4 4.2 3.9 3.8 3.8 3.5 3.3 3.4 2.3 2.1 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 1.8 1.7 1.6 2.1 1.8

3.0 2.8

2.9 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.8 3.9

1.9 2.7

2.1 3.6 3.8 3.9 4.0 3.9 3.6 3.4

1.5 2.6

2.3 2.4 2.5 2.7 2.7 2.9 3.3 2.2 1.1 1.5 1.8 2.0 2.3 2.5 2.7 2.6 2.6 2.2

2.4 2.4 1.2 2.6 2.8 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.2

4.8 3.8 2.9 2.6 2.6 2.4 2.5 2.6 3.3 3.9 4.2 4.3 4.6 4.9 4.8 4.7 5.0 5.2 5.2 5.2 4.7 4.3 4.3 4.5 4.1 3.8 3.8 3.7 4.0 4.5 4.7 5.0 5.0 4.9 5.2 5.3 2.6

1.9 4.4

2.2 4.5

4.8 5.4 5.2 4.0 4.1 3.8 2.4 2.1 2.3 2.8 3.8 4.6 4.9 3.5 0.9 0.8

4.9 2.2 1.8

5.2 1.4 0.1 1.8 1.7 1.6 2.5 2.2 2.2

4.8 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.5 1.7 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.9

5.3 5.1 5.2 5.4 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.0 5.2 5.4 5.2 5.3 5.0 4.9 5.2 5.2 5.1 4.8 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.6 1.9 2.2 2.5 2.7 2.6 2.7 2.9 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.3 3.4 2.4 2.4 2.6 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.4 2.4 2.6 2.8 2.5 2.4 2.5 2.6

5.0 5.4 5.2 5.1 4.5 4.5 4.6 4.1 3.8 3.9 3.7 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.8 3.3 3.5 3.7 2.3 1.2

2.1 2.8 2.8 2.7 2.7

2.9 3.0 3.3

1.7 2.1

2.4 5.2 5.2 4.6 4.4 3.9 3.2 2.6 2.4

2.4 2.2

2.7 2.5 2.3 2.5 2.5 2.7 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.3 1.9 1.8 1.2 0.6 0.5 1.2

4.0 2.1

3.5 3.5 3.2 3.1 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.4 2.4 4.7

2.1 2.0 2.5 3.6 3.9 4.5

2.7 1.8

1.8 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.1 1.9 1.7 1.2 0.7 0.6 2.6 2.3 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.3 2.8 3.4 4.5

1.8 2.8 3.4 4.0 4.6 4.8 5.5 5.3

1.8 1.5 0.6 0.6 0.9 1.4 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.3 3.9 1.9

2.6 2.6 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.3 2.5

4.6 2.5

2.3 4.5 3.2 2.6 2.2 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.7

2.7 5.4

2.4 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.8 3.4 4.0 4.6 4.8 5.4 4.7 4.5 3.9 3.2 2.6 2.2 2.1 2.2 2.4

2.4 3.9

2.6 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4

2.1 2.2 2.6 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.6 2.3

2.8 2.6

5.7 2.3 2.1 2.3 2.8 3.5 4.2 4.7

2.6 3.0 3.2 3.6 2.0 0.7 0.5 4.7 5.0 3.5 5.5 2.5

5.0 5.1 4.8 3.5 2.5 2.3

2.3 4.9 5.5 4.8 4.6 3.9 3.2 2.6 2.1 2.0 3.3 3.3 3.5

4.2 2.7

3.9 3.8 3.3 2.4 2.1 2.3 2.8 3.5 4.7 5.0 5.5 5.4 4.7 4.6 3.9 3.2 2.2 2.1

2.6 2.7

2.4 2.8 3.5 3.1 2.5 2.4

2.6 4.4 4.2 4.4 3.4 2.4 2.4

2.3 2.5 2.7 3.2

2.4 3.9 4.1 3.4 2.6 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.1 1.4 0.7

2.4 2.3 2.82.4

2.1 3.4 4.6 4.9 6.5 5.4 4.6 4.4

5.2 0.7 2.1 3.3 2.9 2.7 2.3 2.1 2.3 4.1

2.5 3.9

4.5 2.6 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 1.8 0.8 1.2 3.1 4.2 4.0 2.4 2.1

3.2 2.4 2.8 3.3 2.2 2.8 3.5 4.1 4.7 5.1 5.7 5.7 4.8 4.5 3.9 3.2 2.6 2.1 2.0 2.5 3.7 4.6

2.5 3.9 4.1 4.7 4.7 4.0 3.9 3.5

2.1 3.0 4.7 4.2 3.6 2.5 2.0 2.1 3.0 3.5 2.0

3.7 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.4 2.5 3.0 2.5

3.0 3.2

2.4 3.6 3.6

2.4 2.0 2.3 2.7 2.9 3.3

2.5 3.9

1.2 2.5 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.2

4.8 3.6

4.7 3.1 3.6 4.0 4.1 5.3 4.9 4.0

2.5 3.0

2.5 2.4

2.3 2.4 2.8 3.6 3.8 3.8

2.6 4.7 3.4 2.5 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.5 2.3 2.2 1.1

2.3 2.5 2.6 3.3 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.5 1.6 0.8 0.9 1.9 3.7 3.4 2.5

2.4 2.3 2.4 3.6 2.0 2.0 2.4 3.0 3.2 3.5 3.7 4.3 4.0 3.5 3.3 3.4 3.0 2.4 2.0 1.9 2.4 3.7

4.1 2.3

2.7 2.9 3.0 3.4 2.1 0.9 1.2 5.5 3.8 2.5 2.0 2.0 2.4 3.0 3.8 4.1

2.1 4.9 2.0

3.2 3.1 2.8 2.7 2.5

2.4 3.3 4.8 4.6 4.0 3.7 3.4 2.9 2.4 2.0 2.5 3.4 3.8 4.1

2.4 2.4 2.8 3.4 3.6 3.7 2.2 0.9

2.5 3.2 2.7 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.5 2.5 2.7 2.4 2.3 0.7 1.1 2.0 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.7 3.3 3.9 4.5 4.7 5.2 5.2 4.6 4.3 3.7 3.1 2.6

2.0 2.9

2.4 2.4 2.4 2.6 2.8 2.9 3.2 0.7 0.9 1.5 1.5 1.7 1.8 2.1 2.7 3.3

4.2 0.6 3.2

3.2 1.7

2.3 2.6 2.0 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.3

3.0 3.9 4.5 4.6 5.4 5.2 4.5 4.5 3.8 2.2

4.9 1.7

4.7 4.5 4.6 3.4 2.5 2.3 2.3

1.6 2.5

4.1 3.6 3.1 2.5 2.1 2.0 1.8

2.2 1.7

2.3 5.2 5.4 1.5 0.9 1.6 3.4 3.1 3.0 2.4

5.0 2.6 2.5 2.3 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.8 3.9 4.3

3.6 3.6 3.7 3.2 2.6 2.4 2.3 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.8 4.2

1.5 1.4 1.2

2.6 2.3 2.3 2.5 2.3 2.1 2.2 2.6 3.2 3.7 4.3 4.5

1.9 3.9 5.0 5.2 4.1 1.4 0.8 1.5 3.0 2.2

1.9 1.7 1.7 1.8 2.0 2.5 2.9 3.0 2.9 2.6 2.1 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.9 2.2 2.8 3.3 3.9 1.8

2.9 1.6 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.1 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.9 2.2 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.3 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.4 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.3 2.0 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.9 2.3 2.7 2.9 2.9 2.7 2.3 3.3 3.4 2.8 2.4 2.3 2.7 3.1 3.6 3.8 3.5 2.9 2.2 1.6 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.8

2.3 1.5 1.6 1.9 2.5 3.3 3.7 3.5

1.6 2.3 3.1 3.5 3.5 3.0 1.8 1.7

0.4 0.4

1.5 2.8 2.1 1.5 1.5 1.7 2.1 2.8 3.6 3.9 3.4 2.5 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.8 2.4 3.2 4.1

0.8 1.9

1.7 1.8 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.2 1.5 1.9 2.7 3.4 4.5 5.4 3.7 3.2 2.4 1.8 1.5 1.7 2.3 3.1 3.6 5.1 4.8 3.5 3.0 2.2 1.7 1.5 1.9 2.5 3.3 3.9 5.6 4.3 3.4 2.6 1.8 1.2 0.6 0.5

1.9 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.9

1.4 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.0 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.0

1.0 1.3 2.0 2.7 3.2 1.9

0.7 0.8

3.3 0.9

3.1 3.6 3.4 2.9 2.3 1.8 1.5 1.2

4.0 0.8

3.4 2.6 2.3 2.1 1.4 1.5 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.0 1.9 1.8 2.2 2.8 3.6 5.0 4.8 3.5 2.7 2.1 1.8 1.7 1.9 2.4 3.0 4.0 5.1 3.1 2.4

1.1 2.4

2.1 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.0 1.8

4.2 1.5

2.3 1.7 1.3 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5

1.9 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.4 3.2 4.1 4.8 5.7 4.2 3.3 2.4 1.3 1.2 1.7

1.2 1.9 3.5 1.7 1.4 1.8 2.4 2.6 2.8 2.7 2.5 2.1 1.7 1.5 1.6 1.8 2.4 3.2 4.4 5.0 3.8 2.9

2.0 1.5 2.4 3.2 3.6 5.3 4.3 3.3

0.7 2.9 3.3 4.9 4.9 3.3 2.9 1.4 1.2

0.2 1.1 2.7 1.7 1.1 1.7 2.8 3.4 4.2 5.0 3.6 3.3 2.4 1.0 1.2 1.9 3.0 3.4 4.5 4.5

0.3 1.4

0.7 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.6 1.2 0.9 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.8 0.2

4.1 1.6 0.5

1.9 0.4 1.5 1.4 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.6 1.0 0.3 1.1 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2

3.4 1.2 1.0 1.3 2.1 2.9 3.4 4.7 4.0 3.0 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.4 2.3 2.7 4.8 3.2 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2

0.7 3.0 2.5 3.8 2.6 2.1 1.5 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5

2.1 4.6 2.8 2.3 1.8 1.2 1.0 1.2

0.7 1.8 1.5 1.5 1.6 2.0 2.6 3.6 4.4 3.9 2.2 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.8 2.3 4.2 4.8 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.4 2.4 3.7 1.7 2.3 2.6 4.4 4.2 2.5 2.2 1.6 1.1 1.0 1.3 1.9 2.3 3.0 4.7 3.4 2.3 2.0 1.2 0.8

2.3 2.9 3.0 3.8 2.8 2.3 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.6 2.3 1.8 1.3 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.2 0.3

3.2 1.9 1.4 1.3 1.6 2.1 3.0 3.4 4.8 3.8 2.4 1.7 1.4 1.4 1.8 2.5 4.1 5.2

0.5 2.5 3.2 4.6 4.6 3.2 2.5 1.8 1.3 1.5 2.0 2.8 3.4 4.5 2.9 2.3 4.1 2.6 3.1 3.3 3.7 3.2 2.4 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7

3.2 0.3 0.3

1.4 3.7 3.3 2.8 1.5 1.3 1.5 1.9 2.6 3.2 4.1

0.4 1.6 1.4 1.4 1.7 2.3 3.0 3.6 4.3 2.0

3.5 3.0 2.6 2.5 2.5 1.8 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.1 2.2 1.8

3.4 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.4 3.2 3.1 2.2 2.4 2.2 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.5 3.2 2.9 2.5 2.1 1.6 1.3 1.6 2.2 3.0 3.5 4.0 3.8 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.0 1.7

3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1

1.9 2.2 3.1 4.1 5.0 5.9 4.4 3.5 3.0 2.7 1.3 1.3 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.9 3.0 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.7 2.7

1.5 1.4 1.7 1.6 1.3

5.1 3.0

3.8 1.6 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.0 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.0 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.5 2.5

3.1 2.4 2.4 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.6 2.5

3.7 4.3 4.3 4.2 4.1 3.8 3.7 3.6 3.4 3.1 3.0 3.1 3.4 3.7 3.9 4.1 4.1 4.2 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.4 4.4 4.3 4.4 4.4 4.5 4.4 4.4 4.3 4.3 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.3 4.3 4.2 4.3 4.3 4.2 4.1 4.0 3.9 3.7 3.6 3.5 3.3 2.9 2.5 2.6 1.8 1.2 1.4 1.9 2.4 2.8 3.1 3.2 3.1 2.9 2.6 2.6 2.7 1.8 1.8 1.8 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.3

3.1 2.4 2.7 3.3 3.5 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.7 3.7 3.6 3.5 3.4 3.2 3.1 2.8 2.8

2.1 3.7 3.7

2.2 4.3 2.9 2.8 2.9 3.1 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.7 3.8 3.8 3.7

2.2 2.7

2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.0 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2

3.7 2.1 2.2

2.8 3.5 4.1 4.5 4.9 4.6

2.3 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.0 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.9 1.6 1.3

2.2 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.9 1.9 2.0

2.1 3.4 4.1 4.7 4.2 3.7 3.0 2.5 1.5 1.6 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9

1.0 1.9

2.2 2.4

2.1 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.3 2.2 2.3 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.2 2.1

2.3 2.2 2.2

2.1 2.4 2.0 1.5 1.3 1.1 1.0 0.9 1.0

1.6 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.5 2.4 1.7

2.0 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.0 2.0 6.5 4.6 3.5 2.5 1.8 1.4 1.3 1.6 2.2 2.9 3.5 3.9 3.6 3.2 2.5 2.1 1.8 1.8 1.8 2.3 2.9 3.4 3.5 3.3 2.8 2.3 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.2 2.7 3.3 3.6 3.5 3.2 2.6 2.2 1.9 1.9 2.0

2.1 2.0 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.5 2.6 3.5 3.8 4.4 5.2

2.2 2.2 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.7 1.5 1.4

1.9 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.1 1.4

5.1 2.7 2.4 1.3 1.5 1.5 2.0 2.1

1.3 4.2

1.1 1.8 1.8 3.9 5.2 7.0

2.1 1.3 1.1

2.4 3.3 3.7 4.1 4.2 4.1 3.7 3.3 2.5 1.9 1.4 1.7 2.3 3.2 4.2 5.6 3.7 3.0 2.1

0.1 1.5 2.2

2.4 4.5 2.5 2.4 2.3 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.1

2.2 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.8 2.6 2.6 3.4 3.8 4.3 4.6 4.8 4.2 3.5 2.6 1.9 1.5 1.4 1.7 2.3 3.2 4.2 5.9 4.5 3.6 2.9 2.4

2.5 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Building B West Parking
Building B South Dock
Building B North Trailer
Building A North Parking
Building A East Dock
Building A West Trailer
EXHIBIT A2 ATTACHMENT 2.A2
3949
NO
Date:11/13/2020
Drawing:

DATE ISSUE
PROJECT:

Giovannoni Logistics Center - Rev1
PH2.0 BLDG B Site Lighting

SKCURT ON
STOP
STOP
POTS
S
TOP
STO
P
S
TO
P
D
E
V
L
I
N
R
O
A
D
8 YARD 8 YARD
8 YARD
8 YARD
8 YARD 8 YARD
8 YARD 8 YARD
WM-3MH: 48.583
WM-3MH: 48.583
WM-3MH: 48.583
WM-3MH: 48.583
WM-3MH: 48.583WM-3MH: 48.583WM-3MH: 48.583
WM-3MH: 48.583WM-3MH: 48.583
MH: 48.583WM-3
WM-3MH: 48.583
WM-4MH: 43.083 WM-4
MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083 MH: 43.083
WM-4 WM-4
MH: 43.083 MH: 43.083
WM-4 WM-4
MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083 MH: 43.083
WM-4 WM-4
MH: 43.083
S1BMH: 25 MH: 25
S1B
MH: 25S1B
MH: 25S1B
MH: 25
S1B S1B
MH: 25
MH: 25S1B S1B
MH: 25 MH: 25 S1B MH: 25 S1B MH: 25 S1B S1B MH: 25
MH: 8WM-2 WM-4
MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-2MH: 8
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-2MH: 8
WM-2
MH: 8
WM-2MH: 8 MH: 8
WM-2 WM-2
MH: 8 MH: 8
WM-2
WM-2MH: 8
WM-2MH: 8
WM-4MH: 48.583
WM-2MH: 8
S2MH: 25
MH: 25S1A
MH: 25S1A
MH: 43.083WM-4 WM-4
MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083 MH: 43.083
WM-4
MH: 43.083WM-4 WM-4
MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083 MH: 43.083
WM-4
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-3MH: 48.583
MH: 48.583WM-3
WM-3MH: 48.583
WM-3MH: 48.583
WM-3MH: 48.583
WM-3MH: 48.583
MH: 48.583WM-3
WM-3MH: 48.583
WM-3MH: 48.583
WM-3MH: 48.583
WM-4MH: 43.083
MH: 25S2
MH: 25S1B
MH: 25S1B
MH: 25S1B
S1BMH: 25MH: 25S1BMH: 25S1B
S1BMH: 25MH: 25S1BMH: 25S1BMH: 25S1B

1.1 1.0 1.1 2.20.7 0.8 1.0 3.1

1.7 1.9 1.5 1.5 1.8

4.4 0.5 0.6 1.0 3.5

2.8 0.5 0.6 1.8

2.2 1.9

4.5 4.1 3.6 3.3 2.8 3.0 3.6 4.2 5.1 5.0 3.7 2.6 1.9 4.4 1.3 1.1 1.9

4.2 4.0 4.1 3.1 2.2 2.0 1.9

4.5 4.6 4.6 4.7 4.6 4.5 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.6 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.6 4.6 4.7 4.7 4.6 3.6 3.6

3.7 4.5 4.7 4.7 4.5 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.6 4.7 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.3 4.1 4.2 4.0

2.0 4.7

1.8 3.4 3.8 3.8 3.8 4.1 4.5 4.4 4.5 4.9 4.9 4.9 5.0 4.8 5.1 5.2 5.1 5.2 5.1 4.9 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.4 5.3 5.3 4.9 4.7 4.9 4.6 4.2 4.1 4.1 3.7 2.9 2.9 3.3 3.7 3.8 3.6 3.1 2.3 1.7 1.3 1.0 1.0 2.9

4.2 2.0 5.1 5.3 5.3 5.0 5.0 5.3 5.2 5.2 5.4 5.1 5.0 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.4 5.2 5.0 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.3 5.3 5.0 5.1 5.3

3.0 4.2

3.9 3.8 4.1 3.4 2.6 2.5 2.2 2.1 2.0 1.7 2.8 3.2 3.4 3.5 3.8 3.9 3.9 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.2

1.0 3.0

3.7 3.7 3.7 3.8 3.8 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.8 3.8 3.7 3.5 1.5 1.6 3.9 4.7 4.7 5.6 5.5 3.9 3.2 2.2 1.3 0.9

4.2 3.4

4.2 3.7 3.0 2.1 1.5 1.0 2.0 4.6

4.8 4.9 4.5 3.1 1.9 1.9 1.8 2.0 1.8 3.1 3.5 3.6 3.7 4.0

4.3 2.1

4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.2 4.3 4.3 4.4 4.4 4.3 4.3 4.4 4.4 4.5 4.4 4.3 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.5 4.4 4.3 5.2

3.2 4.2 4.3 4.5 4.4 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.5 4.5 4.3 4.2 4.0 4.0 3.9 3.6 3.5 3.4 3.2 2.9 3.2 3.9 5.1

2.7 3.3 3.6 2.0 0.8 0.7 1.3

3.3 1.8 2.1 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.7 2.5 2.7 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.8

2.4 2.5

3.1 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.9 1.8 0.6 0.6 1.1

1.3 1.7 1.9 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.6 2.5 2.8 2.5 2.4 2.3

4.6 2.1

3.8 0.6 2.0

3.4 3.5 3.3 3.1 2.6 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.6 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.4 2.8 3.7 4.1 4.2 2.7 1.2

6.0 2.9

1.6 3.1 1.2 0.7 1.8

2.4 2.5

4.4 2.9 2.8 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.5 2.3 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.8 3.9 5.3 4.7

1.2 2.6

2.4 5.0 3.0 3.0 3.1 3.0 2.7 2.5 2.3 2.0 1.6 0.9 0.8

2.3 2.8 2.7 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.2

2.9 2.4 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.2 2.2 3.6 4.0 4.1 4.2 5.0 4.9 5.0 5.3 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.4 5.3 5.5 5.5 5.3 5.2

3.7 4.5 5.4

2.3 5.4 5.5 5.4 5.2 5.3 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.4 5.3 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.5 5.4 5.3 5.2 5.2 5.3 5.2 5.3 5.2 5.3

1.2 2.2

2.4 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.1 2.0 2.1 1.4 0.7 0.7

3.3 1.3 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.5 2.5 2.7

2.4 1.7

0.8 2.4

2.9 2.7 2.7 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.9 1.7 1.2 0.7 1.8

2.4 1.8 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.5 2.7

1.7 2.3 2.8 3.0 2.9 2.7 2.3 1.9 1.7 1.7 1.8 2.0 2.8 2.9 2.8 2.5 2.1 1.9 1.7 1.7 1.9 2.7

3.3 1.7 1.9 2.4 2.2 2.5 2.7 2.7 2.4 2.0 1.8 1.7 1.8 2.0 2.3 2.6 2.4 2.8 2.8 2.8

3.9 3.3

3.7 0.6 3.3 3.6 3.6 3.3 2.8 2.2 1.8 1.6 1.6 1.8 2.2 2.7 3.0 3.1 2.9 2.4 2.0 1.7

1.3 2.4 3.8 4.9 5.1 5.7 5.4 5.1 6.0 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.1 2.0 2.0 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.4 2.4 2.3 1.9

2.5 5.0 6.5 5.8 6.1 5.2 4.2 3.3 2.7 2.5 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.0 1.9

3.2 3.8 4.0 3.2 2.5 1.8 1.4 1.4 1.8 2.5 3.1 3.4

3.9 5.4 4.0 4.8 2.9 2.1 1.5 1.3 1.5 1.9 2.7 3.2 4.3 4.1 3.2 2.6 1.9 1.4 1.3 1.6 2.2 2.9 3.4 4.5 3.6 3.0

4.4 3.2 2.8 1.8 1.1 1.0 1.4 2.4 3.3 3.8 4.8 4.0 3.3 2.6 1.6 1.1 1.2 1.8 2.8 3.4 4.3 4.9 3.6 3.3 2.3 1.5 1.1 1.4 2.2 3.2 3.5 5.0 4.8 3.4

1.4 2.0 1.5 1.9 2.4 3.3 4.2 4.1 3.2 2.3 1.8

2.3 4.1 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.7 2.2 3.0 4.1 4.5 3.5 2.6 1.6 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.6 2.0 2.6 3.6 4.2 3.8 2.8 2.1 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.7 2.2 2.9 3.7 4.0 3.4 2.5 2.0 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.9

1.6 2.3

1.7 1.4 1.7 2.4 3.0 3.7 4.3 3.3 2.8 2.1 1.4 1.5 2.0 2.7 3.3 4.4 4.3 3.2

2.9 3.0 3.9 4.8

3.3 3.5 3.7 3.7 3.6 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.9 3.1 3.4 3.6 3.3 3.1 3.0 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1

1.8 1.3 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.5 1.8

3.6 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.2 2.0 1.7 1.5

1.2 3.2

3.7 3.4 3.3 3.0 2.8 2.9 2.8 3.0 3.2

3.1 3.7 2.2 2.4 2.5 3.3 3.3 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.7 3.7 3.6 3.6 3.7

3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.1 3.0 2.9 3.0 2.2 2.2 2.6

2.6 3.2 3.2 1.9 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.9 3.1 1.5 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.6 2.6

2.2 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.1 1.0

2.5 1.4 2.5 3.8 5.5 5.9 5.9 4.8 4.9 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.5 2.6 2.1 2.4 2.0 1.7 1.5 1.3

1.2 5.6 6.1 6.7 6.4 6.5 5.0 3.8 3.0 2.5 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.2 0.9

2.4 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.5

1.2 2.6 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.6

0.7 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 1.2

1.3 2.7 3.8 4.9 5.7 5.6 5.0 4.3 4.4 5.3 6.2 5.9 5.3 4.5 3.5 2.9 2.4 2.6

3.3 3.2 3.0 2.9 2.6 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.4 2.6 2.6 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.8 3.7 4.0 2.5 1.0 0.7 0.6

0.7 4.0

2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.4 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.7 3.0 3.1 3.4 2.0 0.6 0.6

5.0 5.1 4.9 3.6 2.6 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.6 2.7 4.8 4.8 5.0 5.2 5.2 5.2 32.1 5.3 5.2 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.2 8.5 5.9 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.2 5.2 5.9 7.1 5.3

3.8 3.8 3.9 3.3 2.6 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.8 3.9 5.3 5.8 4.6 1.5 0.8 0.6

1.5 1.8 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.3 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.5 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.1 1.9 1.7 1.1 0.6 0.5 1.2

2.3 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.6 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.3 2.1 1.9 1.3

4.0 2.7 2.0 0.7 0.6 1.5

1.6 1.9 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.5 2.5

4.8 2.3 2.4 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.7 1.6 0.6 0.5 0.7

1.2 1.6 1.8 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.3 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.2 2.0 2.0 1.2 0.9 0.6 0.5

4.1 4.1 3.9 3.3 3.0 2.9 2.6 2.5 3.3 3.3 3.5 3.8 3.9 4.1 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.5 4.6 4.6 4.7 4.7 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.6 4.6 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.6 4.5 4.7 4.7 4.6 4.6 4.4 4.1 4.2 4.1 3.8 3.6 3.5

5.3 3.9 2.6 3.0 3.5 3.7 3.6 3.8 4.2 4.2 4.1 4.4 4.5 4.3 4.4 4.2 3.9 3.8 3.8 3.5 3.3 3.4 2.3

3.0 2.8

3.6 3.8 3.9 4.0 3.9 3.6 3.4 2.7 2.6 2.9 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.8 3.9

2.4 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.7 2.7 2.9 3.3 2.2 1.5 1.1 1.2

4.8 3.8 2.9 2.6 2.6 2.4 2.5 2.6 3.3 3.9 4.2 4.3 4.6 4.9 4.8 4.7 5.0 5.2 5.2 5.2 4.7 4.3 4.3 4.5 4.1 3.8 3.8 3.7 4.0 4.4 4.5 4.7 5.0 5.0 4.9 5.2 5.3

2.2 4.5

4.8 5.4 5.2 4.0 4.1 3.8 2.4 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.8 3.8 4.6 4.9 3.5 0.9 0.8

5.2 1.4

4.8 5.3 5.1 5.2 5.4 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.0 5.2 5.4 5.2 5.3 5.0 4.9 5.2 5.2 5.1 4.8 1.1 1.2

5.0 5.4 5.2 5.1 4.5 4.5 4.6 4.1 3.8 3.9 3.7 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.8 3.3 3.5 3.7 2.3 1.2

2.8 2.8 2.7 2.7 2.4 2.4

2.2 2.7 2.5 2.3 2.5 2.5 2.7 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.1 1.9 1.8 1.2 0.6 0.5 1.2

3.5 2.7 3.5 3.2 3.1 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.1 1.9 1.7 1.2 0.7 0.6 1.8

1.5 0.6 0.6 0.9

2.5 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.3 2.5

2.3 2.7

2.2 2.6 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.4

3.0 3.2 3.6 2.0 0.7 0.5 4.7

5.0 5.1 4.8 3.5 2.5 2.3

2.6 2.3 2.7

2.7 4.4 4.2 4.4 3.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.8 3.5 3.1 2.5 2.4 2.4

3.9 4.1 3.4 2.6 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.1 1.4 0.7

2.4 2.32.4

2.1 2.1 0.7

2.5 3.9

2.4 4.5 2.6 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.8 1.8 0.8 1.2 3.1

3.0 3.6 3.6 3.7 3.2 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.4 2.5 3.0 2.5

2.4 2.5

4.8 4.7 1.2

2.5 2.5

2.4 4.7 3.4 2.5 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.5 2.3 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.8 3.6 3.8 3.8 1.1

2.3 2.5 2.6 3.3 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.5 1.6 0.8 0.9 1.9

2.4 2.3 2.4

4.1 2.3

2.7 2.9 3.0 3.4 2.1 0.9 1.2

3.2 3.1 2.8 2.7 2.5

2.4 3.2 2.7 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.5 2.5 2.7 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.4 2.8 3.4 3.6 3.7 2.2 0.9 0.7 1.1

2.0 2.9

2.4 2.4 2.4 2.6 2.8 2.9 3.2 0.7 0.9

4.2 0.6

3.2 3.0

4.7 4.5 4.6 3.4 2.5 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.5 2.6 2.5 2.3 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.8 3.9 5.2 5.4 4.3 1.5 0.9 1.6

3.6 3.6 3.7 3.2 2.6 2.4 2.3 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.8

2.6 2.3 2.3 3.9 5.0 5.2 4.1 1.4 0.8 1.5

1.6 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.1 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.9 2.2 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.3 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.4 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.3 2.0 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.9 2.3 2.7 2.9 2.9 2.7 2.3 1.9 1.7 1.7 1.8 2.0 2.5 2.9 3.0 2.9 2.6 2.1 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.9 2.2 2.8 3.3 3.4 3.3 2.8 2.4 2.3 2.7 3.1 3.6 3.8 3.9 3.5 2.9 2.2 1.6 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.4

2.3 3.1 3.5 3.5 3.0 2.3 1.8 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.9 2.5 3.3 3.7 3.5 2.8 2.1 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.7 2.1 2.8 3.6 3.9 3.4 2.5 1.9 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.8 2.4 3.2 4.1

1.7 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.9

1.4 1.3 2.0 2.7 3.2 3.3 3.1 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.0 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.0

4.0 3.4 2.6 2.3 2.1 1.4 1.5 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.0

1.1 2.4

1.5 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.0 1.8

2.2 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.4 3.2 4.1 4.8 5.7 4.2 3.3 2.4 1.3 1.2

1.2 1.9 3.5 1.7 1.4 1.8

2.9 3.3 4.9 4.9 3.3 2.9 2.0 1.4 1.1 1.5 2.4 3.2 3.6 5.3 4.3 3.3 2.7 1.7 1.2 1.1 1.7 2.8 3.4 4.2 5.0 3.6 3.3 2.4 1.4 1.0 1.2 1.9 3.0 3.4 4.5 4.5

4.1 3.4 3.0 1.9 1.2 1.0 1.3 2.1 2.9 3.4 4.7 4.0 3.0 2.5 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.4 2.3 2.7 3.8 4.8 3.2 2.6 2.1 1.5 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.5

1.8 1.5 1.5 1.6 2.0 2.6 3.6 4.4 3.9 2.9 2.2 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.8 2.3 3.0 4.2 4.8 3.8 2.8 2.3 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.6 2.3 1.8 1.3 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.0

2.5 3.2 4.6 4.6 3.2 2.5 1.8 1.3 1.5 2.0 2.8 3.4 4.5 2.9 2.3 4.1 3.2 2.6 1.9 1.4 1.3 1.6 2.1 3.0 3.4 4.8 3.8 3.1 2.4 1.7 1.4 1.4 1.8 2.5 3.3 4.1 5.2 3.7 3.2 2.4 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.7

3.2 1.4 3.7 1.6 1.4 1.4 1.7 2.3 3.0 3.6 4.3 3.3 2.8 2.0 1.5 1.3 1.5 1.9 2.6 3.2 4.1

3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.4 3.2 3.1 2.2 2.4 2.2 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.5 3.2 2.9 2.5 2.1 1.6 1.3 1.6 2.2

2.2 3.1 4.1 5.0 5.9 5.1 4.4 3.5 3.0 2.7 1.3 1.3 2.4 2.5 3.0 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.9 3.0 3.0 3.1 3.1 3.2 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.7 2.7

3.8 1.6 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.0 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.0 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.5 2.5

3.1 2.4 2.4 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.6 2.5

3.1 2.4 2.7 3.3 3.5 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.6 3.5 3.4 3.2 3.1 2.8 2.8 3.7

2.2 2.8 3.5 4.1 4.5 4.9 4.6 4.3 2.7 2.9 2.8 2.9 3.1 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.7 3.8 3.8 3.7 3.7

2.4 3.4 4.1 4.7 4.2 3.7 3.0 2.5 2.2 1.5 1.6 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9

2.3 1.6 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.5 2.6 3.5 3.8 4.4 5.2 6.5 4.6 3.5 2.5 1.8 1.4 1.3 1.6 2.2

1.8 1.8 3.9 5.2 7.0 5.1 4.2 2.4 2.7 2.4 1.3 1.5 1.5 2.0 2.1

3.3 3.7 4.1 4.2 4.1 3.7 3.3 2.5 1.9 1.5 1.4 1.7 2.3

2.2 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.8 2.6 2.6 3.4 3.8 4.3 4.6 4.8 4.2 3.5 2.6 1.9 1.5 1.4 1.7 2.3

2.5 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Building B West Parking
Building B South Dock
Building B North Trailer
3950
NO
Date:11/13/2020
Drawing:

DATE ISSUE
PROJECT:

Giovannoni Logistics Center - Rev1
PH2.1 BLDG A NORTH Site Lighting
NO
TR
UC
KS
NO
TR
UCK
S
STO
P
ST
OP

SKCURT ON
STOP
STOP
POTS
S
TOP
8YAR
D
8YAR
D
8YA
RD
8YA
R
D
WM-2MH: 8
WM-2MH: 8
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-3MH: 48.583
MH: 48.583WM-3
WM-3MH: 48.583
WM-3MH: 48.583
WM-3MH: 48.583
WM-3MH: 48.583
MH: 48.583WM-3
WM-3MH: 48.583
WM-3MH: 48.583
WM-3MH: 48.583
WM-4MH: 43.083
MH: 25S2
MH: 25S1B
MH: 43.083WM-4
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
MH: 43.083WM-4
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
MH: 43.083WM-4
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-2MH: 8
WM-2MH: 8
WM-2MH: 8
MH: 8WM-2
WM-2MH: 8
WM-2MH: 8
MH: 43.083WM-4
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
MH: 43.083WM-4
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083WM-4MH: 43.083
MH: 43.083WM-4
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
MH: 8WM-2
WM-2MH: 8
MH: 8WM-2
WM-2MH: 8
WM-2MH: 8
WM-2MH: 8
WM-3MH: 48.583
WM-3MH: 48.583 MH: 48.583
WM-3 WM-3
MH: 48.583 WM-3 MH: 48.583 WM-3 MH: 48.583 WM-3 MH: 48.583 MH: 48.583 WM-3 WM-3 MH: 48.583 MH: 48.583 WM-2 WM-3 MH: 8 WM-2 MH: 8 WM-2MH: 8
MH: 25S2
S1BMH: 25 MH: 25
S1B
MH: 25S1B
MH: 25S1B
MH: 25S1B
MH: 25S1B
MH: 25S1B
S1BMH: 25
MH: 25
S1B
MH: 25S1B
MH: 25S1B
S1BMH: 25MH: 25S1BMH: 25S1B

4.0 5.2 5.1 4.3 3.7 3.1 2.5 2.1 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.0

4.3 2.9 2.1 2.1 2.4 3.0 3.6 4.2 4.5 5.0 5.3 4.6

5.5 4.7 4.4 3.7 3.1 2.4 2.0 2.0 2.7 3.6

3.4 4.6 3.0 2.1 2.1 2.4 3.0 3.6 4.3 4.7 5.2 5.3

4.4 5.4

4.0 0.5 0.6 1.0 3.5 3.3 3.1 2.7 2.1 2.4 3.7

0.5 0.6 1.8

2.2 3.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.6

3.9 3.0 3.6 4.3 4.6 5.1 5.3 5.1 5.0 4.5 4.3 2.5

2.8 3.0 3.6 4.2 5.1 5.0 3.7 2.6 1.9 1.3 1.1 1.9 4.4 4.5 4.4 3.2 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.9 3.5 4.2 4.5 4.8 5.3 5.0 5.1 4.6 4.4 3.8 3.2 2.5 2.1 2.0 2.6 3.7 4.0 4.6

2.9 3.7 2.9 3.3 3.8 3.6 3.1 2.3 1.7 1.3 1.0 1.0 2.9 3.3 3.2 2.9 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.9 3.5 4.2 4.6 4.9 5.3 5.0 5.3 4.7 4.5 3.8 3.2 2.5 2.1 2.0 2.6 3.8 4.3 4.9

1.0 3.4 3.0 3.4 2.9 2.3 2.1 2.3 2.9 3.6 4.3 4.8 5.2 6.3 5.2 5.5 4.8 4.5 3.8 3.2 2.5 2.2 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.5 3.0

3.5 1.5 1.6 3.4 3.9 4.7 4.7 5.6 5.5 3.9 3.2 2.2 1.3 0.9

2.9 5.1 3.2 3.9 4.3 5.2 3.7 3.0 2.1 1.5 1.0 2.0 4.6 4.7 4.6 3.2 2.2 2.0 2.3 2.9 3.6 4.2 4.7 5.1 5.5 5.0 5.2 4.6 4.4 3.8 3.2 2.5 2.1 2.1 2.5 3.0 3.1 3.3

2.7 3.3 3.6 2.0 0.8 0.7 1.3 1.8 1.7 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.9 3.5 4.1 4.6 4.9 5.4 5.2 4.6 4.4 2.7

2.7 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.8

2.4 3.9 3.3 2.3 2.0 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.1

1.5 2.1 2.4 2.9 3.6 4.2 4.8 5.1 6.6 5.4

3.1 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.9 1.8 0.6 0.6 1.1 1.4 1.7 1.9 3.9

2.8 2.5 2.4 2.3

4.7 4.5 3.3 2.7 2.3 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.5 1.4

4.6 4.1 5.5 5.6 4.8 4.6 3.9 3.3 2.6 2.2 2.1

3.8 0.6 2.0 3.2 2.8 2.7 2.3 2.2 2.3 2.9 3.5 4.7 5.1 2.0

2.5 2.4 2.3 2.4 2.8 3.7 4.1 4.2 2.7 1.2

6.0 2.0 1.9 2.3

2.9 2.4

1.6 3.1 1.2 0.7 1.8 2.5 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.9 4.1 4.5 4.8 5.3 5.2 4.6 4.5 3.9 3.3 2.3 2.0

2.4 4.4 3.5

2.7 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.8 3.9 5.3

2.7 4.7

1.8 1.6 1.5 1.4

3.0 3.0 3.1 3.0 2.7 2.5 2.3 2.0 1.6 1.2 0.9 0.8 2.6 2.8 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.9 3.6 5.1 2.1

2.3 4.2 4.8 5.6 5.0 5.5 4.7 4.5 3.9 3.2 2.5 2.1 2.6 3.2 3.2 3.4

2.4 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.1 2.0 2.1 1.4 0.7 0.7 1.2 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.9 2.1 2.4 2.9 3.5 4.2 4.8 5.0 4.8 2.2

2.7 5.7 5.6 4.6 3.9 3.2 2.6 2.2 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.9

0.8 2.4

2.9 2.7 2.7 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.9 1.7 1.2 0.7 1.8 2.0 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.9 3.5 4.2 5.0 5.6 2.4

2.4 4.8 2.7

2.7 5.1 5.5 4.7 4.6 3.9 3.2 2.6 2.2 2.1 2.3 3.2

2.4 1.6 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.5 3.0 3.7

2.1 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.4 3.0 3.7 4.3 4.8 5.3 5.5 5.2 5.4 4.7 4.4 3.8 3.1 2.5 2.1 2.1 3.3 2.4 2.6 2.9

4.3 5.1

2.4 2.3 1.9 1.4 1.5 1.7 1.9 2.2 2.5 3.0

4.7 5.4 5.1 5.1 4.6 4.4 3.8 3.1 2.5 2.2 2.1 2.5 2.0 2.0 2.2

3.4 3.5 2.8 2.1 2.1 2.4 3.0 3.7 4.3 4.7 5.3 8.7 65.1 5.4 4.5 4.7 3.7 3.1 2.4 2.1 2.0 2.7 4.0 4.4 5.1

2.9 2.1 2.4 2.6 2.4

4.5 2.1 3.0 3.7 4.4 4.7 5.2 5.9 5.3 5.3 4.7 4.5 3.8 3.1 2.4 2.1 2.1 2.7 3.5 3.4 3.8

3.6 2.5 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.5 1.8 2.1 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.4 3.0 3.6 4.3 4.8 5.2 5.6 5.2 5.4 4.7 4.5 3.8 3.2 2.6 2.2 2.0 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.23.0 2.2 1.9 2.2 2.6 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.9 3.1 1.5 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.6 2.6 2.9 2.5 2.4 2.2 2.1 2.4 2.9 3.6 4.3 4.7 5.1 6.2 47.5 5.4 4.7 4.5 3.8 3.2 2.6 2.2 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.92.5 2.6 2.1 2.4 2.0 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.0

4.9 5.3 5.1 5.1 4.5 4.4 3.8 3.2 2.6 2.2 2.0 1.6 1.6 1.5

1.2 1.8

1.2 0.9

4.2 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 1.2 1.6 1.6 1.7 2.0 2.2 2.5 3.0 3.6 4.2 4.7 5.1 5.4 5.1 5.4 4.7 4.4 3.8 3.2 2.6 2.2 2.0 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.1

2.9 2.4 2.1

1.1 0.7 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.9 2.3 2.5 2.2 2.5

2.8 5.7

2.6 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.4 3.7 4.0 2.5 1.0 0.7 0.6 0.7

0.7 4.0

3.6 0.6

1.9 2.2 2.4 2.9 2.4 3.1 3.3 3.8 3.2 3.1 2.4 2.8 2.4 2.2 2.1 1.9

2.4 1.5

2.6 2.4 2.3 2.4 2.7 3.0 3.1 3.4 2.0 0.6

0.8 2.6 2.4 2.1 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.9 1.5

1.9 2.4 2.1 2.4 2.2 2.0 2.1 1.7

1.5 1.2

2.2 2.2 2.3 2.8 3.9 5.3 5.8 4.6 0.8 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.5 1.7 2.1 2.3

2.7 2.5 2.4

1.7 2.3

2.4 2.1 2.0 2.5

2.5 2.4 2.1 1.9 1.7 1.1 0.6 0.5 1.2 2.5 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.1 2.5 3.0 3.1 3.1

3.1 2.0

2.7 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.3 2.1 1.9 1.3 2.1 3.0

3.8 2.0 0.7 0.6 1.5 3.3 2.9 2.6 2.3 2.1 2.4 3.0 3.2 3.2 3.3 3.8 4.1 3.2 3.5

3.0 3.2 3.4 3.9 4.0 3.5 3.2 3.0 2.9 2.4 2.1 2.2

3.2 2.2

2.5 2.5 2.7 1.6 0.6 0.5 0.7 1.0

2.5 2.7 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.5

2.4 2.7 3.0

3.3 3.1 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.1 2.1

1.4 1.2 0.6 0.9 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.1

3.8 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.2 2.0 2.0 0.5

2.4 2.4 2.1 1.9 1.9 1.6 2.3 2.0 1.8 1.7

2.3 2.1 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 1.8 1.7 1.6 2.1 1.8

2.8 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.7 2.7 2.9 3.3 2.2 1.1 1.5 1.8 2.0 2.3 2.5 2.7 2.6 2.6 2.1 2.2 1.9 1.5

2.4 2.4 1.2 2.6 2.8 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.2

2.6 2.4 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.8 3.8 4.6 4.9 3.5 0.9 0.8 1.9

4.9 2.2 1.4 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.5 1.7 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.8 0.1 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.6 2.5 2.2 2.2

2.3 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.4 2.8 3.3 3.5 3.7 2.3 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.6 1.9 2.2 2.5 2.7 2.6 2.7 2.9 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.3 3.4 2.4 2.4 2.6 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.4 2.4 2.6 2.8 2.5 2.4 2.5 2.6

2.1 2.9 3.0 3.3

1.7 5.2 5.2 4.6 4.4 3.9 3.2 2.6 2.1 2.4

2.7 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.3 1.9 1.8 1.2 0.6 0.5 1.2

4.0 2.1

2.6 2.4 2.4 4.7

2.1 2.0 2.5 3.6 3.9 4.5

1.8 1.8

2.4 2.4 2.3 2.1 1.9 1.7 1.2 0.7 0.6 2.6 2.3 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.3 2.8 3.4 4.5

1.8 2.8 3.4 4.0 4.6 4.8 5.5 5.3

1.8 2.3 1.5 0.6 0.6 0.9 1.4 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.3 4.6 4.5 3.9 3.2 2.6 2.2 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.9

5.4 2.4

1.9 2.1 2.3 2.8 3.4 4.0 4.6 4.8 5.4 4.7 4.5 3.9 3.2 2.6 2.2 2.1 2.2 2.4

3.9 2.6 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4

2.1 2.3

2.8 5.7 2.3 2.1 2.3 2.8 3.5 4.2 4.7

2.6 2.3 3.0 3.2 3.6 2.0 0.7 0.5 4.7 5.0 3.5 4.9 5.5 5.5 4.8 4.6 3.9 3.2 2.6 2.1 2.0 2.5 3.5 3.3 3.3

4.2 2.7

3.9 3.8 3.3 2.4 2.1 2.3 2.8 3.5 4.7 5.0 5.5 5.4 4.7 4.6 3.9 3.2 2.2 2.1

3.1 2.5 2.4

2.6 2.4

2.3 2.5 2.7 3.2

2.5 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.1 1.4 0.7 2.8

2.4 2.1 3.4 4.6 4.9 6.5 5.4 4.6 4.4

5.2 0.7 2.1 3.3 2.9 2.7 2.3 2.1 2.3 4.1

2.6 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.6 1.8 0.8 1.2 3.1 4.2 4.0 2.4 2.1

3.2 2.8 3.3 2.2 2.8 3.5 4.1 4.7 5.1 5.7 5.7 4.8 4.5 3.9 3.2 2.6 2.1 2.0 2.5 3.7 4.6

2.5 3.9 4.1 4.7 4.7 4.0 3.9 3.5

2.1 3.0 4.7 4.2 3.6 2.5 2.0 2.1 3.0 3.5 2.0

3.0 2.5

2.4 3.0 2.4 2.0 2.3 2.7 2.9 3.3

3.9 1.2

3.1 3.6 4.0 4.1 5.3 4.9 4.0 3.6 3.0 2.5 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.2

2.5 2.4

2.3 2.4 2.8 3.6 3.8 3.8

2.6 2.3 2.2 1.1

3.3 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.5 1.6 0.8 0.9 1.9 3.7 3.4 2.5

2.4 2.4 3.6 2.0 2.0 2.4 3.0 3.2 3.5 3.7 4.3 4.0 3.5 3.3 3.4 3.0 2.4 2.0 1.9 2.4 3.7

2.7 2.9 3.0 3.4 2.1 0.9 1.2 4.1 5.5 3.8 2.5 2.0 2.0 2.4 3.0 3.8 4.1

2.1 2.4 4.9 3.3 4.8 4.6 4.0 3.7 3.4 2.9 2.4 2.0 2.0 4.1 2.5 3.4 3.8

2.4 2.4 2.8 3.4 3.6 3.7 2.2 0.9

2.5 2.7 2.3 2.4 0.7 1.1 2.0 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.7 3.3 3.9 4.5 4.7 5.2 5.2 4.6 4.3 3.7 3.1 2.6

2.4 2.4 2.4 2.6 2.8 2.9 3.2 2.0 0.7 0.6 0.9 1.5 1.5 1.7 1.8 2.1 2.7 3.3 3.2

1.7 2.3 3.9 4.5 4.6 5.4 5.2 4.5 4.5 3.8 2.6 2.2 2.0 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.3

4.9 4.1 3.6 3.1 2.5 2.1 2.0 1.8 1.7 1.6

2.2 1.7

5.2 5.4 1.5 0.9 1.6 3.4 3.1 3.0 2.4

5.0 2.5 2.3 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.8 3.9 4.3

2.7 2.3 2.8 2.4 2.4 4.2

1.5 1.4 1.2

2.6 2.3 2.5 2.3 2.1 2.2 2.6 3.2 3.7 4.3 4.5

1.9 3.9 5.0 5.2 4.1 1.4 0.8 1.5 3.0 2.2

3.3 3.9 1.8

2.9 2.8 2.4 2.3 2.7 3.1 3.6 3.8 3.5 2.9 2.2 1.6 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.2 1.5 1.9 2.7 3.4 4.5 5.4 3.7 3.2 2.4 1.8 1.5 1.7 2.3 3.1 3.6 5.1 4.8 3.5 3.0 2.2 1.7 1.5 1.9 2.5 3.3 3.9 5.6 4.3 3.4 2.6 1.8 1.2 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4

3.6 3.4 2.9 2.3 1.8 1.5 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.7

2.6 2.6 2.6 2.4 3.2 3.5 4.1 4.8 5.7 4.2 3.3 2.4 1.7 1.3 1.2 1.4 1.8 2.4 2.6 2.8 2.7 2.5 2.1 1.7 1.5 1.6 1.8 2.4 3.2 4.4 5.0 3.8 2.9 2.3 1.9 1.7 1.8 2.2 2.8 3.6 5.0 4.8 3.5 2.7 2.1 1.8 1.7 1.9 2.4 3.0 4.0 5.1 4.2 3.1 2.4 1.7 1.3 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5

0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.6 1.2 1.6 0.9 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.8 1.5 1.4 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.6 1.0 0.3 1.1 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2

3.2 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2

0.7 2.6 2.1 1.5 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5

2.1 4.6 2.8 2.3 1.8 1.2 1.0 1.2

0.7 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.4 2.4 3.7 1.7 2.3 2.6 4.4 4.2 2.5 2.2 1.6 1.1 1.0 1.3 1.9 2.3 3.0 4.7 3.4 2.3 2.0 1.2 0.8

2.3 3.8 2.8 2.3 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.6 2.3 1.8 1.3 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.2 0.5 0.33.7 3.2 2.4 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7

0.4 0.3 0.3

3.5 3.0 2.6 2.5 2.5 1.8 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.1 2.2 1.8

3.4 3.1 2.2 2.4 2.2 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.5 3.2 2.9 2.5 2.1 1.6 1.3 1.6 2.2 3.0 3.5 4.0 3.8 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.72.7

1.5 1.4 1.7 1.6 1.3

2.5 2.4 2.4 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.6 1.8 1.2 1.4 1.9 2.4 2.8 3.1 3.2 3.1 2.9 2.6 2.6 2.7 1.8 1.8 1.8 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.3

2.2 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.0 1.8 1.7 1.6 2.2 1.3 1.9 1.6

2.1 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.2 2.1 1.0

2.3 2.2 2.4 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.1 1.0 0.9 1.0

6.5 4.6 3.5 2.5 1.8 1.4 1.3 1.6 2.2 2.9 3.5 3.9 3.6 3.2 2.5 2.1 1.8 1.8 1.8 2.3 2.9 3.4 3.5 3.3 2.8 2.3 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.2 2.7 3.3 3.6 3.5 3.2 2.6 2.2 1.9 1.9 2.0

2.1 2.4 2.6 2.5 2.6 3.5 3.8 4.4 5.2

2.2 2.2 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.7 1.5 1.4

1.9 3.3 3.7 4.1 4.2 4.1 3.7 3.3 2.5 1.9 1.4 1.7 2.3 3.2 4.2 5.6 3.7 3.0 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.1 1.3 1.1 1.1 1.4 1.3

0.1 1.5 4.5 2.5 2.4 2.3 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.1

2.5 2.8 2.6 2.6 3.4 3.8 4.3 4.6 4.8 4.2 3.5 2.6 1.9 1.5 1.4 1.7 2.3 3.2 4.2 5.9 4.5 3.6 2.9 2.4

2.5 Building A North Parking
Building A East Dock
Building A West Trailer
3951
NO
Date:11/13/2020
Drawing:

DATE ISSUE
PROJECT:

Giovannoni Logistics Center - Rev1
PH2.1 BLDG A SOUTH Site Lighting
8YARD
8YAR
D
8Y
A
R
D
8Y
ARD
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
MH: 43.083WM-4
WM-4MH: 43.083
MH: 43.083WM-4
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-2MH: 8
MH: 8WM-2
WM-2MH: 8
WM-2MH: 8
WM-2MH: 8
WM-2MH: 8
MH: 25S1A
S1AMH: 25
S1BMH: 25
WM-3MH: 48.583
WM-3MH: 48.583
WM-3MH: 48.583
WM-3MH: 48.583
WM-3MH: 48.583 MH: 48.583
WM-3 WM-3
MH: 48.583 MH: 48.583
WM-3 WM-3
MH: 48.583 MH: 48.583
WM-2 WM-3 MH: 8 MH: 8 WM-2 WM-2 MH: 8 MH: 8 WM-2
S1AMH: 25
MH: 43.083WM-4
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-4MH: 43.083
MH: 43.083WM-4
WM-4MH: 43.083
WM-2MH: 8
MH: 8WM-2
MH: 8WM-2
WM-4MH: 43.083
MH: 8WM-2
WM-2MH: 8
MH: 8WM-2
S1BMH: 25 MH: 25 S1B MH: 25 S1B
MH: 25S1B
S1BMH: 25
MH: 25
S1B
MH: 25S1B
MH: 25S1B
S1BMH: 25

0.6 5.4 5.5 4.7 4.3 3.6 2.9 2.3 2.0 2.1 2.3 2.4

0.2 1.0 1.3 1.8 2.3 3.1 3.8 4.5 4.7 5.4

4.5 5.1

3.0 4.6 5.4 5.4 5.5 5.1 4.7 4.3 3.6 3.0 2.4

2.7 3.8

3.0 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 1.0 1.3 1.8 2.3

0.5 4.5

2.0 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 1.0

4.3 4.5

0.8 2.8

2.3 5.7 8.0 4.9 4.6 4.1 3.5 2.8 2.2 1.9

4.0 4.1

4.2 0.3 0.4 0.5

1.3 1.8 3.1 3.8 4.4 4.7 5.4 8.9 5.7 5.2 4.7 3.6 2.3 2.0 2.0 2.7 3.3 3.2 3.3

1.9 2.9

1.3 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.3 1.7 2.3

2.1 1.0

4.3 5.0 4.6 4.2 3.6 3.0 2.5 2.1 1.9 1.6 1.4

0.5 2.5

0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8

3.0 3.7 4.5 5.1 5.3 6.0 5.0 4.5 4.2 3.6 3.0 2.1 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.3

5.2 1.9

1.0 5.3

0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.7 1.3 2.3 3.1 3.8 4.4 4.7 5.4 5.3 5.5 5.2 4.3 3.6

1.9 1.9 2.0

4.3 1.7

0.4 2.0

0.8 1.0 1.3 1.7 2.3 3.1 3.7 4.4 4.7

4.7 0.3 0.3 0.5 5.2

3.0 2.4 2.1 1.9 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.2

0.6 2.7

5.2 4.6 2.9 1.5

3.1 2.1 1.5 1.3 1.2 1.1 0.9

1.0 4.4 4.7 5.4 5.2 5.2 4.8 4.4 3.9 3.3

5.1 1.8

1.0 0.9 1.3 1.8 2.4 3.1 3.8 4.5 4.7 5.3 4.9 5.3 4.8 4.0 3.3 2.7 2.1 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.7

2.4 4.5

3.0 1.5 1.1 0.9 1.1 1.4 1.9 2.5 3.2 3.8

3.8 2.6 5.2

3.2 2.6 2.0 1.6 1.2 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.4

4.0 2.3 1.1

4.1 3.7 2.8 1.6 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.4 1.8

4.3 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.2 3.9 3.3 2.6 2.1 1.7 1.3 0.9 0.5

2.6 0.7

1.0 1.3 1.8 2.4 3.1 3.8 4.4 4.6 5.1 5.1

3.4 2.0 1.6 1.4 1.2 0.9 4.5

1.9 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.1 3.2

1.0 4.3

1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.3 1.8 2.4 3.1 3.8

5.3 1.2

4.8 4.1 3.5 2.8 2.2 1.9 1.9 2.8 4.0 4.0

3.4 1.0

4.5 2.2

1.6 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.3 1.8 2.4 3.1 3.8 4.6 5.0 5.3 4.9 4.6 4.1 3.4 2.7 2.1 1.9 2.1 2.2

1.7 5.3

1.8 3.2

3.8 4.4 4.7 5.4 5.0 5.4 5.0 4.6 4.1

1.9 2.8 2.3 2.0 1.4 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.3 2.4 2.8

2.5 2.8

3.1 2.1 1.9 2.1 2.4 3.0 3.7 4.4 4.7 5.2 5.5

2.5 1.1 1.0 1.1 2.2 1.9 4.7

1.9 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.1

1.01.8 1.1

1.0 3.1 2.7 2.4 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.4 3.0 3.7

5.3 0.7

5.3 4.4 3.7 3.1 2.5 2.2 1.9 1.7 1.5 1.3

3.1 0.8

4.7 13.1 5.4 4.7 4.4 3.7 3.1 2.5 2.2 2.0

2.2 1.7 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.5 1.9 2.4 3.0 3.7 4.3 5.4 33.3 1.7

2.0 3.7 4.4 4.7 5.3 5.6 5.3 5.3 4.7 4.4 3.7

1.8 2.4

1.7 1.9 1.5 1.5 1.8 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.7

1.7 5.4

3.0 5.2 4.3 3.7 3.1 2.5 2.1 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.0

4.3 5.1

4.3 2.9 2.1 2.1 2.4 3.0 3.6 4.2 4.5 5.0 5.3 4.6

5.5 0.6

4.7 4.4 3.7 3.1 2.4 2.0 2.0 2.7 3.6

3.4 4.6 3.0 2.1 2.1 2.4 3.0 3.6 4.3 4.7 5.2 5.3

4.4 5.4

2.0 4.0

0.5 0.6 1.0 3.5 3.3 3.1 2.7

1.6 1.6

2.1 1.8

2.4 5.5 5.2 5.2 4.7 4.3 3.7 3.1 2.5 2.2

2.8 1.7

3.7 4.7

0.5 0.6 1.8

2.2 3.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.6

3.9 3.0 3.6 4.3 4.6 5.1 5.3 5.1 5.0 4.5 4.3 2.53.0 4.7 5.3 5.4 5.4 5.2 4.7 4.4 3.6 3.0

4.7 2.6 2.1 1.7 1.4 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.3 1.7 2.3 3.7 4.5 2.0

0.9 1.9

1.7 2.3 3.0 3.7 4.4 4.7 5.3 5.4 5.4

2.4 1.0

2.0 3.0 2.8 2.5 1.6 1.0

2.7 3.4 3.3 3.5

2.5 1.3

4.7 1.7 3.2

3.0 2.4 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.2

1.2 4.3

1.1 2.3 3.0 3.7 4.3 4.6 5.2 63.5 6.6 5.2

4.2 3.6

5.4 4.3

1.4 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.3 1.7 2.3 3.0 3.7 4.4 4.8 5.4 5.4 5.2 4.7 4.3 3.7 3.0 2.4 2.1 2.1 2.3 2.8

2.4 3.1 3.0 2.6 1.7 1.2

2.5 3.0 3.1 3.3

5.3 2.1

1.4 4.3 4.5 5.1 5.3 5.2 5.0 4.5 4.3 3.7 3.0 2.1

5.1 1.3

1.0 1.1 1.8 2.4 3.0 3.7 4.3 4.6 5.1 5.4 5.5 4.7 3.7 3.0 2.4 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.4 2.8

2.3 4.3

4.1 3.7

4.6 3.0 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.3 1.7 2.3 3.0 3.7 4.3 5.3 5.3

3.7 3.0 2.3 2.0 2.0 2.8 4.1 4.3 4.6

1.7 3.8

2.2 4.9 4.4 3.0 1.7 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.3 1.8

4.7 3.7

3.0 5.3 5.1 4.6 4.3 3.7 3.0 2.4 2.0 2.0 2.8 4.3

5.5 2.6 2.0 1.9 2.0 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2

2.5 2.7 5.4 5.2 2.4

3.5 5.2 5.1 4.5 1.4 0.7 0.53.4

3.3 2.3 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.1

2.3 2.2

4.0 5.0 5.7 5.7 3.3 2.9 2.7 2.8 2.6 2.3 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.2 2.5 3.0 2.6

5.1 5.7 2.2 0.7 0.5

3.7 2.7 2.8 3.0 3.0 2.7 2.4 2.1 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.5 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.6 2.3 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.3 2.5 2.6 2.5 2.5

1.9 2.8

0.5 3.5 3.3 2.9 2.7 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1

2.0 1.6 2.3

1.8 1.8 2.1 2.8 3.1 3.3 3.3 2.9 1.1 0.7

3.4 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.3

2.1 2.2

1.8 4.7 4.3 3.1 2.5 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.3 1.9

2.4 2.7 3.3 4.0 4.2 3.6 1.1 0.7 0.5

2.5 4.7 2.1

1.9 2.2 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.0

3.5 1.4 1.4 2.0 3.0 3.6 4.5 5.4 4.0 3.6

0.3 0.9 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.3 3.8 3.9 5.2 4.4 3.0 1.4

5.8 2.0 2.7 1.8 1.6 2.3 3.3 3.6 5.1 5.2 3.6 3.3 2.4 1.7 1.4 2.5 3.3 3.8 5.6 4.5 3.4 3.0 2.5 2.8 4.0

0.6 1.8

1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.2 1.5 3.4 2.1 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.1 2.1 3.6 1.6 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.4 1.5 3.4 3.5 1.6 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.8 1.0 1.3 2.0 4.1 2.8 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.9 2.4 2.6 2.4 0.2

0.8 1.5

3.6 3.1 2.4 2.0 1.8 1.8 2.0 2.5 3.2 4.0

4.1 1.9 4.8 5.4 4.8 3.4 3.1 4.1 2.9

5.2 1.7 0.6 0.4

3.8 4.3 3.8 2.3 2.0 1.9 1.9 2.2 2.6 3.4 4.0 4.0 3.5 2.7 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.3 2.8 3.4 3.7 3.5 2.9 2.5

3.2 2.2

1.3 3.8 3.9 3.7 3.3 3.4 3.6 4.5 3.8 2.6 1.9 1.6 1.7 2.0 2.6 3.3 3.9 4.7 3.2 2.4 4.7

0.5 0.3

2.1 3.2 2.2

3.6 3.7 1.9 1.7 1.8 2.2 2.8 3.5 4.7 4.7 3.5 2.9 1.8 1.7 1.8 2.3 2.9 3.7 5.0 4.1 3.1 2.6 2.4 5.3

5.8 3.2 2.9 3.4 3.0 2.6 2.2 1.8 1.0 0.6

0.6 3.9

0.5 1.2 1.6 2.1 2.9 3.8 4.8 4.8 5.0

0.3 2.2

3.4 4.5 3.3 3.2 3.3 3.3 2.8 2.3 1.8 1.4 0.9 0.6

0.4 5.2

0.3 0.7 0.9 1.2 1.6 2.1 2.8 3.7 4.6 4.4

1.1 4.7

2.8 4.7 4.7 5.5 3.6 3.3 3.2 2.7 3.5 3.6

0.4 1.3 1.8 2.3 3.6 3.4

5.5 5.4 4.5 1.4 0.8 0.5 0.3

4.54.8 6.4 4.0 3.6 3.3 2.8 3.5 3.3 3.1 2.9 2.4

3.9 5.0

4.0 1.3 1.7 2.2 2.8 3.7

1.2 0.7 0.4 0.3

0.7 5.4

1.5 3.3 3.9 4.4 4.7 5.5 4.7 4.2 4.0 3.6

0.4 1.5 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.9 2.0

0.6 0.4 0.3

2.6 1.3 1.1 1.4 1.9 2.5 3.2 3.9 4.3 4.5 5.3 6.9

3.2 1.1

2.6 2.3 1.9 1.6

1.5 1.2 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.31.6

1.0 4.5

0.8 0.8 0.9 1.2 1.5 2.0 2.7 3.6 4.3 4.2 5.0 3.7 3.5 3.4 3.2 2.7 2.1 1.6 1.2 0.9 0.4 0.3

1.6 4.1

3.4 0.3

4.7 5.4 4.7 4.2 3.9 3.5 3.2 2.6 2.0

0.6 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.5 2.0 2.6 4.0 4.4 1.2

3.7 1.5 2.2 2.4 2.5 2.7 2.8

0.8 0.5 0.4

2.5 3.2

2.0 2.1 2.2 2.1 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 3.0 3.3 3.6 1.3

2.5 4.2

1.9 1.9 2.2 2.5 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.6 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.2 2.2 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.5

2.3 2.3

1.2 1.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.7 2.7 1.7 1.7 2.2

0.4 2.0

0.7 2.1

1.9 1.8 1.8 2.2 2.9 3.1 3.2 3.2 2.7 0.5

2.2 2.5

1.8 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.4

0.4 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.7 2.7 3.9 6.7 5.8 6.1

2.7 1.3 0.5

2.3 0.9 2.3 3.9 6.0 5.9 5.2 1.8 0.9 0.6

1.4 6.5

2.2 1.3 1.9 2.5 2.4 2.2

2.1 0.8 0.5 0.32.5

5.9 0.8

1.3 1.5 1.9 2.0 2.2 1.8 3.1 4.0

0.2 2.3

6.0 3.2

1.5 2.1 2.4 5.7

4.9 4.2 1.5 0.9 0.6 0.4

2.7 3.7

2.9 2.6 2.6 2.4 2.4 2.7 2.4 2.1 1.9 2.0 2.0 4.6

2.5 2.8

2.4 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.3 25.7 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.5 3.6 3.8 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.2 2.2 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.8

3.5 2.4 1.6 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.5 3.0 3.7

2.1 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.4 3.0 3.7 4.3 4.8 5.3 5.5 5.2 5.4 4.7 4.4 3.8 3.1 2.5 2.1 2.1 3.3 2.4 2.6 2.9

4.3 5.1

2.4 2.3 1.9 1.4 1.5 1.7 1.9 2.2 2.5 3.0

4.7 5.4 5.1 5.1 4.6 4.4 3.8 3.1 2.5 2.2 2.1 2.5 2.0 2.0 2.2

3.4 3.5 2.8 2.1 2.1 2.4 3.0 3.7 4.3 4.7 5.3 8.7 65.1 5.4 4.5 4.7 3.7 3.1 2.4 2.1 2.0 2.7 4.0 4.4 5.1

2.9 2.1 2.4 2.6 2.4

4.5 2.1 3.0 3.7 4.4 4.7 5.2 5.9 5.3 5.3 4.7 4.5 3.8 3.1 2.4 2.1 2.1 2.7 3.5 3.4 3.8

3.6 4.2 4.9 5.3 5.1 5.1 4.5 4.4 3.8 3.2 2.6 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.6 1.5 3952

EXHIBIT B
Applicant Confirmation of Conditions of Approval
Giovannoni Logistics Center Design Permit
(FILE NO. PL20-0042)
As shown by my signature below, I confirm that I understand and agree to abide by the conditions of approval included in the City Council Resolution dated February 21, 2023.

Applicant’s signature Date
Applicant’s name
1 st Property Owner’s signature Date
1 st Property Owner’s name
2 nd Property Owner’s signature Date
2 nd Property Owner’s name
This approval shall not be effective until the applicant and property owner execute and return the “Applicant Confirmation of Conditions of Approval” form to the Community Development Department.

Please return signed confirmation to the City of American Canyon Community Development Department, 4381 Broadway, Suite 201, American Canyon, CA 94503
3953
EXHIBIT C ATTACHMENT 2. EXHIBIT C
3954
3955
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON APPROVING THE

GIOVANNONI LOGISTICS CENTER TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP TO CREATE A TWO-LOT SUBDIVISION FOR UP TO 1,069,904 SQUARE FEET OF HIGH CUBE WAREHOUSE USES ON 70.2 ACRES; LOCATED NORTH OF GREEN ISLAND ROAD AND EAST OF DEVLIN ROAD, APN 057-090-008, 057-130-034, 057-130-036, (FILE NO. PL 20-0043)
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 65300 of the State Planning and Zoning Law, the City of American Canyon (City) adopted a General Plan to provide comprehensive long-range planning and a blueprint of the City’s future form, including land use and circulation maps that specify the roadway network and the distribution of types and intensities of land; and
WHEREAS, Buzz Oates LLC, (“applicant”), submitted a Giovannoni Logistics Center Tentative Parcel Map application to create a two-lot parcel map north of Green Island Road, and east of Devlin Road for up to 1,069,904 square feet of high-cube warehouse buildings (the proposed project); and WHEREAS, Lot 1 located at 300 Green Island Road comprises 38.36 acres, and Lot 2 located at 1200 Devlin Road comprises 31.44 acres; and
WHEREAS, on November 17, 2022, the Planning Commission conducted a duly-noticed public hearing to evaluate the Giovannoni Logistics Center Tentative Parcel Map and heard all public speakers and considered written materials including the staff report and oral testimony given at the meeting; and WHEREAS, on December 6, 2022 the City Council certified that the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH# 2021010104) has been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and as adequately reflects the City’s independent judgement and analysis regarding the potential environmental impacts associated with the Giovannoni Logistics Center Project, and adopt CEQA Findings of Fact, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, for the Project, and adopt a the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Project; and
WHEREAS, the Giovannoni Logistics Center Final EIR specifically evaluated the Tentative Parcel Map at a Project level and the City Council reviewed and considered the information contained in the Final EIR prior to approving the proposed project; and
WHEREAS, on December 6, 2022 and February 21, 2023, the City Council conducted a duly-noticed public hearing to evaluate the Giovannoni Logistics Center Tentative Parcel Map and heard all public speakers and considered written materials including the staff report and oral testimony given at the meeting.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council makes all the required findings to approve the Giovannoni Logistics Center Tentative Parcel Map, as follows:

SECTION 1: Tentative Parcel Map Findings
Approval of the Tentative Parcel Map requires that none of the following findings be made, pursuant to American Canyon Municipal Code Section 18.20.055:

A. That the proposed tentative parcel map is not consistent with the City’s General Plan or its elements, or other applicable plans.

ATTACHMENT 3.CC Giovannoni TPM Reso
3956
This Finding cannot be made. The project site is designated for high cube warehouse buildings consistent with allowable uses in the General Plan Industrial land use district. The General Industrial zoning district requires a minimum of 40,000 square feet for parcels. Both proposed Tentative Parcel Map lots are at least 31 acres. Both parcels have safe and adequate access to a public right-of-way and have been designed to accommodate needed utilities and stormwater drainage.

B. That the design and improvement of the proposed tentative parcel map is not consistent with the City’s General Plan or its elements, or other applicable plans.

This Finding cannot be made. As required by the City’s General Plan, the Tentative Map shows proposed roadways and infrastructure sufficient to accommodate up to 1,069,904 square feet of high-cube warehouse buildings.

C. That the site is not physically suitable for the type of development proposed.

This Finding cannot be made. The project site, with the conditions for offsite transportation and utility improvements, will be suitable for up to 1,069,904 square feet of high-cube warehouse buildings anticipated as part of the Giovannoni Logistics Center Project. The Geotechnical and Geologic Fault Investigation prepared by Cornerstone Earth Group (November 2, 2017 – Project No. 582-4-1) demonstrates that there is no geological fault within the proposed Tentative Parcel Map. The preliminary grading and drainage plan, stormwater plan, preliminary utility plan, and fire access plan prepared by CBG Engineers demonstrates that the proposed type of development proposed can be accommodated within the parcel map.

D. That the site is not physically suitable for the density of development proposed.

This Finding cannot be made. Please refer to the discussion under Findings No. A, B and C above.

E. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.

This Finding cannot be made. The impacts of the proposed Project, including the Tentative Parcel Map remain within the impacts previously analyzed and the findings in the Giovannoni Logistics Center Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH# 2021010104). The draft Final Environmental Impact Report and statement of overriding considerations specifically contemplated the proposed Tentative Parcel Map. The Project has the potential to significantly impact the following resources: Aesthetics, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology, Soils and Seismicity, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Energy, Hydrology and Water Quality, Land Use, and Noise. However, each of these potential impacts would be reduced to a less than significant level through the implementation of the mitigation measures contained in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Project. The Project has significant and unavoidable impacts for Air Quality, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Energy. However, the draft Statement of Overriding Considerations concludes that economic, social, and environmental benefits of the Project outweigh the significant and unavoidable adverse impacts.

F. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is likely to cause serious public health problems.

This Finding cannot be made. The proposed Giovannoni Logistics Center Tentative Parcel Map Project uses are consistent with the other adjacent industrial uses and the conditions of approval, particularly those related to mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR, required off-site roadway and utility improvements, will ensure that the proposed development will not create any nuisance or be materially detrimental to public health, or property in the area. The closest residence is 1,250 feet southwest of the project and istoo far from the site for the project to cause serious public health problems to the residences. 3957
G. That the design of the subdivision orthe type of improvements will conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision.

This Finding cannot be made. There is no documentation that public easements for access through or use of the property have been established, other than the recorded easements identified on the parcel map, which will be maintained or replaced by equivalent easements to accommodate public utilities.

H. That the discharge of wastewater, including sewage and stormwater runoff, from the proposed subdivision would result in a violation of existing water quality requirements prescribed by the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB).

This Finding cannot be made. The proposed map has been reviewed by City staff and staff has determined that it complies with all applicable water quality requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control board and city standards.

SECTION 2: Conditions of Approval
General

1. The Tentative Parcel Map approval is granted for a subdivision that will create two industrial lots for up to 1,069,904 square feet on a 70.2-acre site east of Devlin Road and north of Green Island Road.

Lot 1 located at 300 Green Island Road comprises 38.36 acres, and Lot 2 located at 1200 Devlin Road comprises 31.44 acres as shown on Exhibit A. Exhibit A includes the following:
a. Civil Plans prepared by CBG Engineers, dated 09-17-21 consisting of 6 sheets, Tentative Map, Existing Site Conditions, Preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan, Preliminary Utility Plan, Preliminary Stormwater Control Plan, and Preliminary Fire Access Plan.

2. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of American Canyon ("City"), its elected officials, officers, employees, attorneys, representatives, boards, commissions, consultants, volunteers and agents from and against all claims, actions, including actions to arbitrate or mediate, damages, losses, judgments, liabilities, expenses and other costs, or proceedings against the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, attorneys, representatives, boards, commissions, volunteers, or agents to attack, modify, set aside, void, or annul an approval, conditional approval, permit, entitlement, environmental document, environmental clearance, mitigation plan, or any other document or any of the proceedings, acts, or determinations taken, done, or made prior to granting of such approval, conditional approval, permit, entitlement, environmental clearance, environmental document, mitigation plan, or other documents, by the City, including, without limitation, an action against an advisory agency, appeal board, or legislative body within the applicable limitation period.

The obligation to defend, indemnify and hold the City harmless shall include the payment of all legal costs and attorney’s fees (including a third party award of attorney’s fees), arising out of, resulting from, or in connection with the City’s act or acts leading up to and including approval of any environmental document or mitigation plan granting approvals to the applicant, incurred on behalf of, or by, the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, representatives, attorneys, boards, commissions, volunteers and agents in connection with the defense of any claim, action, or proceeding challenging the entire or a portion of an approval, conditional approval, permit, entitlement or any other document of any related claim.

The obligation to defend, indemnify, and hold the City harmless shall include, but not be limited to, the cost of preparation of any administrative record by the City, staff time, copying costs, court costs, or attorney’s fees arising out of a suit or challenge contesting the adequacy of a permit, approval, conditional approval, entitlement, environmental document, mitigation plan, environmental clearance, or any other document or approval related to the applicant’s project. 3958
The City will promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding, or the City fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the applicant shall not be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City.

6. Expiration of this Approval. In accordance with American Canyon Municipal Code (ACMC) Section

18.20.060 the approval shall become null and void and of no effect if a final map has not been submitted for processing within twenty-four months from the date of final action by the city council to approve or conditionally approve a tentative parcel map.

Where the City Engineer determines that a subdivider is required to expend one hundred twenty-five thousand dollars or more to construct or improve public facilities outside the boundaries of the tentative parcel map that are reasonably related to the proposed development on said site, a final parcel map shall be submitted for processing within thirty-six months from the date of final action by the city council to approve or conditionally approve a tentative parcel map.

The City Council may extend the expiration date of a tentative parcel map for not more than twelve months at any one time. All actions of the city council to extend a tentative map shall be at a duly noticed public hearing in accordance with the provisions of this title.

Planning

Building and Safety

8. Construction and grading activities on the site shall be limited to between 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m.

Monday through Friday. Work between the hours of 6:00 pm and 7:00 am and work on weekends and holidays requires prior written approval from the Building Official. If weekends and holiday work is 3959
approved construction and grading activities on the site shall be limited to between 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Saturdays, and between 10:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on Sundays and State and Federal holidays.

9. All construction plans and buildings onsite shall conform to the California Code of Regulations, Title

24. All building plans shall include all necessary recommendations from the Geotechnical Report for the site, to be superseded only by the California Code if any conflicts arise.

10. According to CBC 11B-228.3.2.1, provide the applicable amount of electrical vehicle charging stations (EVCS) and van accessible EVCS spaces for the employee parking lot.

11. Prior to the final inspection, the applicant shall submit a letter of certification to the Building Official from the project architect, civil engineer, and landscape architect certifying that all improvements have been constructed in accordance with the approved building plans. A Certified Access Specialist (CASP) shall also submit a letter certifying that all improvements have been constructed in compliance with applicable state and federal accessibility standards. Determination of consistency shall be subject to the review and approval of the Building Official.

12. Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling: Prior to issuance of a building permit the applicant shall submit a Construction Waste Management (CWM) plan for the diversion of at least 70 percent of the debris from the building demolition and construction. The plan shall include the qualified recycler that will be used, the methods of managing diversion of construction materials on site, and the proposed documentation that will be submitted to confirm that the diversion goal has been met.

Fire Protection
The following Fire Protection conditions shall be satisfactorily addressed on the building permit submittal:

13. Prior to recordation of the Parcel Map, or City issuance of a building permit, whichever occurs first, the Applicant shall form a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District or similar public financing mechanism (CFD) on full legal parcels that are a part of the Project in accordance with ACFPD Agreement 2022-29. A copy of Agreement 2022-29 is included with this Resolution as Exhibit C.

14. In accordance with the standard mitigation measures and conditions of approval set forth by the City of American Canyon, the developer shall pay the Fire Impact Fees (see current Standard Fees and Charges adopted by resolution), prior to the issuance of any building permits.

15. New buildings and additions to existing buildings shall conform to requirements set forth in the currently adopted editions of the California Building Code, California Fire Code, City of American Canyon standards and Nationally Recognized Standards.

16. There shall be no deferred submittals for fire protection equipment and related utilities. Fire protection plans shall not be attached to or bound with the building plan submittal package. This includes but is not limited to Automatic Fire Sprinkler, Fire Alarm, Fixed Fire Protection and Civil plans.

17. All Fire related underground piping and fire appurtenances shall be shown on the Civil plan submittal.

In addition to the Civil plan submittal, at least (1) plan set under separate cover shall be submitted to American Canyon Building Division for routing to the American Canyon Fire Protection District detailing all underground piping and related fire appurtenances including but not limited to underground piping, underground sweep detail, underground trench details showing depth of burial, type of backfill, manufacturer’s specifications of piping, valves joints, fittings and calculated size and locations of thrust blocks, hydrants locations (designate public or private), gate shut-off valves, PIV’s, FDC’s, fire pumps, fire pump and/or riser rooms. The applicant will need to submit all related Fire 3960
information on a separate plan for Fire review. The Fire related portions of the civil plan shall not be bound with the building plan.

18. Underground utility contractor, architect and fire sprinkler contractor shall coordinate the location of risers and control valves prior to the issuance of a building permit.

19. An approved water supply capable of supplying the required fire flow for fire protection systems shall be provided to all premises upon which facilities or buildings are hereby constructed or moved into or within the City. Required fire flow and hydrant distribution shall be in accordance with Appendix B and C of the California Fire Code. Applicant shall demonstrate on plan submittal; square footage of each building on plan and provide the required fire flow information. Applicant shall demonstrate that the number and spacing of onsite fire hydrants meets with requirements of the California Fire Code.

See sample below regarding fire flow and hydrant detail information needed.

BUILDING FIRE FLOW REQUIREMENTS – CFC TABLES B105.2 & B105.1(2)

INFORMATION BELOW IS A SAMPLE AND FOR REFERENCE ONLY
Table B105.1(2) – Building size = 129, 600 square feet
Construction type = Type IIA
FF = 5,250 gpm at 20 psi
Duration = 4 hours
Table B105.2 – Fire sprinkler allowance = - 50%
5,250 – 2,625 = 2,625 gpm
FF = 2,625 gpm @ 20 psi
Duration = 2 hours
Table CC105.1 – Approximate number of hydrants = 3
Average spacing = 400 feet + 25% allowable increase = 500 Maximum distance from street or frontage = 225 feet = 50% allowable increase = 337.5

20. The fire protection equipment shall be located within an interior room having an approved exterior access door or in an exterior enclosure attached to the building, specifically, for the purpose of housing such equipment.

21. Prior to building permit issuance, provide a fire department circulation plan using the City’s ladder truck and demonstrate clear turning movements into and out of the project. The final design of fire department access components shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Marshal prior to installation. Please show how fire apparatus can position near the building on either side, with the ability to turn the apparatus around to leave the project site.

22. Fire Apparatus Access Roads shall be designed in accordance with provisions set forth in the California Fire Code Chapter 5 and Appendix D as amended by the City of American Canyon and the applicable Public Works Standard.
3961

23. Fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed minimum width of 20 feet (curb to curb) and a minimum unobstructed vertical clearance of 13’ 6”. They shall have an all-weather paved surface capable of supporting a GVW of 71,000 pounds.

24. Access roads shall be completed with all-weather surfaces prior to the stockpiling of combustible materials or beginning combustible construction. Fire apparatus access shall be provided to within 150 feet of the most remote portions of all building from an approved exterior route. If this cannot be achieved fire apparatus turn-arounds will be needed.

25. Fire apparatus access roads shall not be obstructed in any manner, including the parking of vehicles.

26. When required by the Fire Chief, fire apparatus access roads shall be designated as Fire Lanes and appropriate signs and/or markings installed in accordance with the California Vehicle Code and approved City standards.

27. Where applicable, improvement plan submittals for permit shall include locations of fire lane red curbing and fire lane signage. Please refer to and include City Public Works Standard FP-2A & 2B with plan submittals for permitting.

28. The City of American Canyon requires that a fire hydrant be in service within 250 feet of the furthest point of construction prior to the stockpiling of combustible materials for the beginning of construction.

29. Fire Department Connections (FDC) shall be located not more than 100 ft. from the nearest fire hydrant.

30. Improvement Plans submitted for permit shall include City of American Canyon “Underground” standards, detail drawings and the applicable City of American Canyon Public Works Standard detail (W-7A, B, C or D) for Fire Service double detector check installations. Also, a separate set of plans shall be submitted detailing all related underground Fire utilities and appurtenances including but not limited to; All underground piping, type, sizes, depth of burial, fittings, thrust blocks, risers, pumps, hydrants, FDC’s, etc.

31. System Protection Area Limitations NFPA 13 – 8.2.1 Maximum floor area on any one floor to be protected by sprinklers supplied by any one sprinkler system riser or combined system riser shall be as follows:

1. Light Hazard – 52,000 sf – per riser

2. Ordinary Hazard - 52,000 sf – per riser

3. *Extra Hazard – Hydraulically calculated - 40,000 sf – per riser

4. Storage – High-piled storage (as defined in 3.9.1.16) and storage covered by other NFPA standards – 40,000 sf – per riser
Public Works
General Conditions of Approval
3962

32. The Applicant shall be responsible for all City plan check and inspection costs. The Applicant shall establish a Developer Deposit Account with the City upon the initiation of plan check services. The amount of the initial deposit shall be determined by the City Engineer. Additional funds may be required based upon actual costs.

33. All improvements shall be designed in accordance with the American Canyon Municipal Code (ACMC), City of American Canyon Engineering Standard Plans and Specifications for Public Improvements (City Standards), except as specifically noted otherwise in these conditions.

34. All new utilities to serve the project, shall be placed underground. Exceptions may be allowed for surface mounted transformers, pedestal mounted terminal boxes and meter cabinets.

35. Unless otherwise explicitly permitted, all existing wells, septic tanks and/or underground fuel storage tanks shall be abandoned under permit and inspection of Napa County Department of Environmental Services or other designated agency. If there are none, the project engineer shall provide a letter describing the scope of the search done to make this determination.

36. A detailed Soils Investigation/Geotechnical Report shall be prepared and submitted for review. The report shall address, at a minimum, potential for liquefaction, R-values, expansive soils and seismic risk. The improvement plans shall incorporate all design and construction criteria recommended in the Geotechnical Report.

American Canyon City CouncilFebruary 21, 2023

American Canyon City Council
February 21, 2023