American Canyon City Council
May 7, 2024

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
City Hall - Council Chambers
4381 Broadway St., Suite 201, American Canyon
May 7, 2024
6:30 PM
Tonight's mee%ng is a limited public forum. American Canyon promotes respec/ul and responsible behavior among its mee%ng par%cipants, whether they are present in person or remotely. Using offensive language or remarks that promote, foster, or perpetuate discrimina%on based on race, creed, color, age, religion, gender marital status, status regarding public assistance, na%onal origin, physical or mental disability or sexual orienta%on/gender iden%fica%on, as well as any other category protected by federal, state or local laws will not be tolerated. In the case of an occurrence, the speaker will be immediately disconnected from the microphone.

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
City Council and other public mee"ngs will be conducted in person. This mee"ng is also available via Zoom, is broadcast live to residents on Napa Valley TV, on our website and on YouTube.

Zoom Link: Click here. Webinar ID: 862 3299 1024; Passcode: 12345.Phone in to Zoom: 408-638-0968 Oral comments, during the meeting: Oral comments can be made in person during Open and Closed Session or through Zoom in Open Session only. On Zoom use the "raise your hand" tool during any public comment period.

To avoid confusion, hands raised outside of Public Comment periods will be lowered.

Wri:en comments: Submit wri4en comments by the eComments link, located on the Mee"ngs & Agendas page of our website. eComments are available to council members in real "me. To allow for Council review of comments, eComments will close at 3:00 pm on the day of the meeting.

The above iden"fied measures exceed all legal requirements for par"cipa"on in public comment, including those imposed by the Ralph M. Brown Act. For more informa"on, please call the Office of the City Clerk at (707) 647-4369 or email [email protected].

AGENDA MATERIALS: City Council agenda materials are published 72 hours prior to the mee"ng and are available to the public via the City’s website at www.cityofamericancanyon.org.

AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT: The City Council will provide materials in appropriate alterna"ve formats to comply with the Americans with Disabili"es Act. Please send a wri4en request to City Clerk at 4381 Broadway, Suite 201, American Canyon, CA 94503 or by email to [email protected]. Include your name, address, phone number and brief descrip"on of the requested materials, as well as your preferred alternative format or auxiliary aid, at least three calendar days before the meeting. 5:30 P.M. – CLOSED SESSION
The mayor will call the meeng to order and conduct roll call. Council will immediately convene into Closed Session aer hearing any public comment on Closed Session items. At 6:30 p.m. the Council will reconvene into Open Session and then resume Closed Session at the end of the meeting to address outstanding items, if necessary.

Mayor: Leon Garcia
Vice Mayor: David Oro
Councilmembers: Mariam Aboudamous, Mark Joseph, Pierre Washington CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA MAY 7, 2024
1 CALL TO ORDER - CLOSED SESSION

ROLL CALL - CLOSED SESSION

PUBLIC COMMENTS - CLOSED SESSION ITEMS
This me is reserved for members of the public to address the City Council on Closed Session Items only. Comments must be made in person and are limited to 3 minutes. Comments for items on the Open Session agenda will be taken when the item is called in Open Session. Comments for Items not on the Closed Session or Open Session agenda will be heard during the Open Session Public Comment period.

MEETING RECESS - COUNCIL TO CONVENE IN CLOSED SESSION
5:30 P.M. CLOSED SESSION ITEMS

1. Conference with Legal Counsel - Exis%ng Li%ga%on. Authorized pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1):
a. City of American Canyon v. City of Vallejo, et al. (Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 34-2022-00327471).
b. City of American Canyon v. Leon Dale Schmidt (Napa County Superior Court Cases No. 22CV001041 and 23PR00161).
c. City of Vallejo v. City of American Canyon et al . (Napa County Superior Court Case No. 23CV000510) [Giovannoni Project]
d. City of Vallejo v. City of American Canyon et al . (Napa County Superior Court Case No. 23CV001600) [Paoli/Watson Lane Annexation]
e. City of Vallejo v. City of American Canyon et al. (Napa County Superior Court Case No. 24CV000544)[Measure K]

2. Conference with Legal Counsel – An%cipated Li%ga%on. Authorized pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 (d)(2). Two (2) Matters. 6:30 P.M. OPEN SESSION - REGULAR MEETING

CALL TO ORDER - COUNCIL TO RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

ROLL CALL - OPEN SESSION

REPORT ON CLOSED SESSION/CONFIRMATION OF REPORTABLE ACTION

PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS

3. Proclamation - May 6 - May 12, 2024 as National Nurses Week

4. Proclamation - May 2024 Older Americans Month
CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA MAY 7, 2024
2 5. Proclama%on - May 2024 as Asian American and Na%ve Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Heritage Month

6. Proclamation - May 2024 as Mental Health Matters Month

7. Proclamation - May 2024 as Historic Preservation Month

8. Proclamation - May 2024 as National Building Safety Month

9. Presentation - CalGreen Building Code Tier 1 and 2

PUBLIC COMMENTS - ITEMS NOT ON CLOSED SESSION OR OPEN SESSION AGENDA This me is reserved for members of the public to address the City Council on items that are not on the Closed Session or Open Session agenda and are within the subject ma(er jurisdicon of the City Council. Comments are limited to 3 minutes. Comments for items on the Open Session agenda will be taken when the item is called in Open Session.The City Council is prohibited by law from taking any acon on ma(ers discussed that are not on the agenda, and no adverse conclusions should be drawn if the City Council does not respond to public comment at this time.

AGENDA CHANGES
The Mayor and Council may change the order of the Agenda or request discussion of a Consent Item. A member of the Public may request discussion of a Consent Item by making that request during Public Comment.

CONSENT CALENDAR

10. Minutes of April 16, 2024
Recommendation: Approve the minutes of the Regular City Council mee"ng of April 16, 2024.

11. Report Upon Return from Closed Session
Recommendation: Approve the Report Upon Return from Closed Session for the Regular City Council meeting of April 16, 2024.

12. Prohousing Incentive Program
Recommendation: Adopt a Resolu"on authorizing applica"on to and par"cipa"on in the Prohousing Designation Program.

13. Watson Ranch Highway 29 Sanitary Sewer Crossing Project Recommendation: Adopt a Resolu"on of the City of American Canyon authorizing the City Manager to enter into an agreement with RSA+ for the Highway 29 Sanitary Sewer Crossing Project for an amount of $218,000.00.

14. Quarterly Investment Report for City and Fire District for Fiscal Year 2023-24 Quarter 3 Recommendation: Receive and file the City and Fire District’s Treasurer’s Report for the quarter ended March 31, 2024.

PUBLIC HEARINGS
There are no Public Hearing Items.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA MAY 7, 2024
3 BUSINESS

15. Contract Award for Benton Way Pavement Rehabilitation Project (TR22-0400) Recommendation: Take the following ac"ons related to Benton Way Pavement Rehabilitation Project:

1. Adopt a Resolu"on amending the FY 2023-24 Capital Budget and increasing the Project Budget;

2. Awarding a construc"on contract to GhiloO Construc"on Company in the amount of $1,344,985.50; and

3. Authorizing the Public Works Director to approve and execute Contract Change Orders in an aggregate amount not to exceed the Project Budget in conjunc"on with the Benton Way Pavement Rehabilitation Project (TR22-0400).

16. Engineer's Report for Citywide LLAD Fiscal Year 2024/25 Recommendation: Adopt a Resolu"on ini"a"ng proceedings, preliminarily approving the Fiscal Year 2024/25 Annual Engineer’s Report, declaring the inten"on to levy and collect annual assessments, and seOng the Public Hearing for considera"on of the American Canyon Landscaping and Ligh"ng Assessment District assessments for FY2024/25 for May 21, 2024, at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers.

17. Traffic Calming Program
Recommendation: Adopt a Resolu"on of the City Council of the City of American Canyon approving the 2024 City of American Canyon Traffic Calming Program Update.

18. 2024 Water Supply and Demand Update
Recommendation: Receive and file a report on water supply and demand in the City of American Canyon Water Service Area.

MANAGEMENT AND STAFF ORAL REPORTS

MAYOR/COUNCIL COMMENTS AND COMMITTEE REPORTS
The Mayor and Council may comment on ma(ers of public concern and announce ma(ers of public interest; no collective council action will be taken.

1. Napa County Local Agency Formation Commission (Aboudamous)

2. Napa Valley Transportation Authority (Garcia/Joseph)

3. Napa Countywide Climate Action Committee (Garcia/Joseph)

4. Napa Valley Tourism Business Improvement District (Oro)

19. City Council Committee Report - Councilmember Mark Joseph

FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

20. Future Agenda Items of Note

ADJOURNMENT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA MAY 7, 2024
4 CERTIFICATION
I, Taresa Geilfuss, City Clerk for the City of American Canyon, do hereby declare that the foregoing agenda of the City Council was posted in compliance with the Brown Act prior to the meeting date. ______________________________________
Taresa Geilfuss, CMC, City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA MAY 7, 2024
5 CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON

PROCLAMATION
National Nurses Week May 6th to May 12th, 2024
WHEREAS, nurses are the heartbeat of healthcare, tirelessly dedicating their skills, compassion, and expertise to enhance the well-being of individuals and communities worldwide; and, WHEREAS, throughout history, nurses have been at the forefront of providing comfort, care, and healing during times of crisis, demonstrating resilience, courage, and unwavering commitment to their patients; and,
WHEREAS, nurses serve as advocates, educators, and innovators, championing health equity, promoting preventative care, and advancing medical knowledge to improve health outcomes for all; and, WHEREAS, the year 2024 marks a special milestone in recognizing the invaluable contributions of nurses, honoring their extraordinary contributions amidst unprecedented challenges, including the global COVID19 pandemic; and, WHEREAS, National Nurses Week provides an opportunity for individuals, organizations, and communities to express gratitude, appreciation, and support for nurses' dedication and sacrifices; NOW, THEREFORE, I, Mayor Leon Garcia, on behalf of the City of American Canyon, do hereby proclaim May 6th to May 12th, 2024, as National Nurses Week. I urge all citizens to join me in honoring and celebrating the remarkable achievements and profound impact of nurses in shaping the future of healthcare.

Dated: May 7, 2024
__________________________
Leon Garcia, Mayor
6 CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON

PROCLAMATION
MAY 2024 AS OLDER AMERICANS MONTH
WHEREAS, May is Older Americans Month, a time for us to recognize and honor American Canyon older adults and their immense influence on every facet of American society; and WHEREAS, through their wealth of life experience and wisdom, older adults guide our younger generations and carry forward abundant cultural and historical knowledge; and WHEREAS, older Americans improve our communities through intergenerational relationships, community services, civic engagement, and many other activities; and WHEREAS, communities benefit when people of all ages, abilities, and backgrounds have the opportunity to participate and live independently; and
WHEREAS, our expanding elder population profoundly impacts every facet of our lives, redefining our ideas of work, retirement and leisure, altering our housing and living arrangements, challenging our healthcare systems, reshaping our economy, and altering social and public policy; and WHEREAS, the opportunity and challenges that await us require our continued commitment to the goal of ensuring that our older Americans enjoy active, productive and healthy lives, and do so independently, safely, and with dignity; and
WHEREAS, American Canyon must ensure that older Americans have the resources and support needed to stay involved in their communities, reflecting our commitment to inclusivity and connectedness; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of American Canyon wishes to express its appreciation for the past and continuing contributions of its older residents to the community and our nation, and recognize that older Americans are a vital and growing part of our city; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that I, Leon Garcia, Mayor of the City of American Canyon, on behalf of the American Canyon City Council, do hereby proclaim May 2024, to be Older Americans Month. I urge every resident to recognize the contributions of our older citizens, help to create an inclusive society and join efforts to support older Americans’ choices about how they age in their communities.

Dated: May 7, 2024 ______________________________
Leon Garcia, Mayor
7 CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON

PROCLAMATION
May 2024 Asian American and Native
Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Heritage Month
WHEREAS, Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders have enriched our nation's history with their contributions, achievements, and cultural heritage; and WHEREAS, Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month provides an opportunity for all citizens to learn about and celebrate the rich history, diverse cultures, and invaluable contributions of Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders to the United States; and WHEREAS, throughout our history, Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders have made significant contributions to every aspect of our society, including science, technology, business, education, government, and the arts, enriching the fabric of our nation; and WHEREAS, Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month presents an opportunity to recognize the challenges and discrimination that Asian American and Pacific Islander communities have faced and continue to face, and to recommit ourselves to the ongoing work of building a more inclusive and equitable society; and WHEREAS, our community is made stronger and more vibrant by our diversity, and we celebrate the myriad cultures, languages, traditions, and histories of Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders that contribute to the tapestry of our shared American identity; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that I, Mayor Leon Garcia, do hereby proclaim May 2024 as Asian American and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Heritage Month, and I urge all residents to join in celebrating the contributions of Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders to our community, our state, and our nation.

Date: May 7, 2024
____________________________
Leon Garcia, Mayor
8 CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON

PROCLAMATION
Mental Health Awareness Month May 2024
WHEREAS, each May we raise awareness about the importance of mental health and its impact on the well-being of the Napa County community, including children, adults, and families; and WHEREAS, mental health challenges are one of the most common health conditions in California, affecting at least two in five adults and children, impacting both the person experiencing mental health challenges and those persons who care and love the person facing the challenges; and WHEREAS, in Napa County 438 elementary school students, 839 middle school/junior high school students, and 3,785 high school students received universal mental health screening through Mental Health Student Services Act (MHSSA) funding administered by the Napa County Office of Education (NCOE) in partnership with Napa County, through our Health and Human Services Agency, from August 1, 2023 to January 31, 2024 for a total of 5,062 students; and WHEREAS, Napa County Health & Human Services Agency’s Behavioral Health Division served over 1,645 unique clients in Fiscal Year 2022-2023, ensuring those served received high-quality mental health services; and
WHEREAS, it is critical that we create a community in Napa County wherein everyone feels comfortable seeking support and prioritizing their mental health and well-being; and WHEREAS, we encourage friends, relatives, neighbors, and all people in our community to learn the signs, support those who are struggling, and assist them in seeking services available.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that I, Mayor Leon Garcia, on behalf of the City of American Canyon, do hereby proclaim the Month of May 2024 as Mental Health Awareness Month. We call upon all members of the community, private businesses, non-profit groups, clubs, and associations, to be allies for individuals with mental illness and to take action to strengthen the mental health of our community.

Above all, let us collectively ensure that all children and adults experiencing mental health challenges are treated with the compassion, respect, and understanding they deserve.

Date: May 7, 2024 ____________________________
Leon Garcia, Mayor
9 CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON

PROCLAMATION
HISTORIC PRESERVATION MONTH, MAY 2024
WHEREAS, the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, coordinates and supports public and private efforts to identify, evaluate, and protect America's historic, cultural, and archaeological resources; and
WHEREAS, in 1973, May was designated "Preservation Month" to raise awareness of historic preservation, instill national and community pride, promote heritage tourism, and highlight the social, economic, and environmental benefits of historic preservation; and WHEREAS, Napa County Landmarks, celebrating its 50th anniversary this year, promotes appreciation and preservation of historic buildings, sites, and districts through educational programs, public policy, and research; and
WHEREAS, Landmark’s efforts include public outreach for historic structures in American Canyon such as the cement silos and post-war subdivisions;
WHEREAS, Landmarks honors the dedication of individuals and groups throughout the year, celebrating outstanding efforts in restoration and adaptive reuse that exemplify best practices in historic preservation;
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Mayor Leon Garcia, on behalf of the City of American Canyon, do hereby proclaim May as Historic Preservation Month and call on our citizens to support Napa County Landmarks’ efforts to preserve the rich history of Napa County.

Dated: May 7, 2024
________________________
Leon Garcia, Mayor
10 CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON

PROCLAMATION
NATIONAL BUILDING SAFETY MONTH 2024
WHEREAS, the City of American Canyon recognizes that our future depends on the growth and strength of safe homes, buildings, and infrastructure; and
WHEREAS, safe buildings ensure a high quality of life that protect us when disasters strike, and WHEREAS, building safety depends on the devotion of many committed professionals in the public and private sectors, including Building Officials, Permit Technicians, Plan Check Engineers, Civil Engineers, Building Inspectors, Code Enforcement Officers, Planners, Fire Prevention Officials, Architects, Engineers, Builders, Tradespeople, Design Professionals, Laborers, Plumbers, and construction industry support staff and manufacturers; and
WHEREAS, working together with the International Code Council, a nonprofit that brings together “built environment experts” at all levels of government to create highest-quality building codes; and WHEREAS, modern building codes provide comfortable, energy-efficient environments that safeguard people from natural hazards such as hurricanes, snowstorms, tornadoes, wildland fires, floods and earthquakes; and
WHEREAS, National Building Safety Month reminds everyone that our largely unknown building safety protectors assure that buildings essential to our prosperity are safe, sustainable, and affordable; and WHEREAS, “Mission Possible,” the theme for Building Safety Month 2024, encourages us all to raise awareness about building safety on a personal, local, and global scale.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED that the City of American Canyon joins the Nation in recognizing the Month of May 2024 as National Building Safety Month.

Dated: May 7, 2024
__________________________________________
Leon Garcia, Mayor
11 CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING

ACTION MINUTES
April 16, 2024
5:30 P.M. – CLOSED SESSION

CALL TO ORDER - CLOSED SESSION
The City Council meeting was called to order at 5:31 p.m.

ROLL CALL - CLOSED SESSION

Present: Councilmember Mariam Aboudamous, Councilmember Mark Joseph, Councilmember Pierre Washington, Vice Mayor David Oro, Mayor Leon Garcia

Absent: None
Excused: None
Councilmember Mariam Aboudamous is participating in this meeting remotely under the provisions of AB2449.

PUBLIC COMMENTS - CLOSED SESSION ITEMS
Mayor Garcia called for public comments. Written comments: none. Oral comments: none. The public comments period was closed.

MEETING RECESS - COUNCIL TO CONVENE IN CLOSED SESSION
5:30 P.M. CLOSED SESSION ITEMS

1. Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation. Authorized pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1):
a) City of American Canyon v. City of Vallejo, et al. (Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 34- 2022-00327471).
b) City of American Canyon v. Leon Dale Schmidt (Napa County Superior Court Cases No. 22CV001041 and 23PR00161).
c) City of Vallejo v. City of American Canyon et al. (Napa County Superior Court Case No. 23CV000510) [Giovannoni Project]
d) City of Vallejo v. City of American Canyon et al. (Napa County Superior Court Case No. 23CV001600) [Paoli/Watson Lane Annexation]
e) City of Vallejo v. City of American Canyon et al. (Napa County Superior Court Case No. 24CV000544)[Measure K]
12 2. Conference with Legal Counsel – Anticipated Litigation. Authorized pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 (d)(2). Three (3) Matters.
6:30 P.M. OPEN SESSION - REGULAR MEETING

CALL TO ORDER - COUNCIL TO RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION
The City Council meeting was called to order at 6:35 p.m.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was recited.

ROLL CALL - OPEN SESSION

Present: Councilmember Mariam Aboudamous, Councilmember Mark Joseph, Councilmember Pierre Washington, Vice Mayor David Oro, Mayor Leon Garcia

Absent: None
Excused: None
Councilmember Mariam Aboudamous is participating in this meeting remotely under the provisions of AB2449.

REPORT ON CLOSED SESSION/CONFIRMATION OF REPORTABLE ACTION A report on Closed Session and confirmation of reportable action was given by City Attorney William Ross.

PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS

3. Proclamation recognizing National Fair Housing Month Mayor Garcia announced the proclamation recognizing National Fair Housing Month. It was received by Executive Director Pablo Zatarain, Fair Housing Napa Valley.

4. Proclamation recognizing April 22, 2024, as National Earth Day Mayor Garcia announced the proclamation recognizing April 22, 2024, as National Earth Day. It was received by Executive Director Janelle Sellick, American Canyon Community & Parks Foundation with foundation board and staff members.

5. Proclamation recognizing April 21-27, 2024, as National Volunteer Week.

Mayor Garcia announced the proclamation recognizing April 21-27, 2024, as National Volunteer Week. It was received on behalf of all American Canyon Community Groups by 2023 Gateway Award Winner Clarence Mamaril, with former Gateway Award winners Beth Marcus, Joan Bennett and Fran Lemos. 13 6. Presentation - Rotary Club of Napa Spirit Horse Fundraiser Council received a presentation on the Rotary Club of Napa Spirit Horse Fundraiser from Rotarian Dorothy Salmon.

PUBLIC COMMENTS - ITEMS NOT ON CLOSED SESSION OR OPEN SESSION AGENDA Mayor Garcia called for public comments. Written comments: none. Oral comments: Joan Bennett was called to speak; Arvind Nischal was called to speak; Hugh Marquez was called to speak; Justin Hamilton Hole was called to speak. The public comments period was closed.

AGENDA CHANGES
There were no changes to the agenda.

CONSENT CALENDAR
Action: Motion to adopt CONSENT CALENDAR made by Vice Mayor David Oro, seconded by Councilmember Pierre Washington, and CARRIED by roll call vote.

Ayes: Councilmember Mariam Aboudamous, Councilmember Mark Joseph, Councilmember Pierre Washington, Vice Mayor David Oro, Mayor Leon Garcia Nays: None
Abstain: None

Absent: None
Excused: None

7. Minutes of April 2, 2024
Action: Approved the minutes of the Regular City Council meeting of April 2, 2024.

8. Report Upon Return from Closed Session
Action: Approved the Report Upon Return from Closed Session for the Regular City Council meeting of March 19, 2024.

9. 2024 Military Equipment Inventory and Equipment Use Policy Action: Adopted Minute Order 2024-02 approving the 2024 Military Equipment Inventory and Equipment Use Policy.

10. Utility Rate Municipal Code Updates
Action: Waived final reading, read by title only, and adopted Ordinance 2024-05 by the City Council of the City of American Canyon amending City of American Canyon Municipal Code (ACMC) Chapter 13.06: "Water Rates and Connection Fees", Chapter 13.14 "Water Conservation Plan", and Chapter 14.04: "Wastewater Rates and Charges" to establish new potable water, recycled water and wastewater property related fees and charges. 14 11. Proposed Measure U
Action: Adopted Resolution 2024-28 approving the proposed Napa Valley Transportation Authority - Tax Agency's Measure U - Napa Valley Transportation Improvement Act, for the purpose of improving local streets and roads and investing in regional capital projects.

12. Amend Terms to Inter-Fund Loans made to the Recycled Water Enterprise from the Water and Sewer Enterprises
Action: Adopted Resolution 2024-29 amending the terms of the Inter-Fund Loans made to the Recycled Water Enterprise Fund by the Water and Sewer Enterprise Funds, setting the interest rate for these Inter-Fund Loans at 1% and extending the total term to thirty years from date of origination.

PUBLIC HEARINGS

13. Watson Ranch Lot 8 Subdivision
Council received a staff report and presentation on the Watson Ranch Lot 8 Subdivision from Senior Planner William He with Terry McGrath available for questions. Mayor Garcia opened the public hearing and called for public comments. Written comments: none. Oral comments: Beth Marcus was called to speak. Public comments and the public hearing were closed. Council members disclosed ex parte communications.

Action: Motion to adopt Resolution 2024-30 of the City Council of the City of American Canyon approving a Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map for Watson Ranch Lot 8 to create 25 single family home lots on 2.3 acres within the Watson Ranch Specific Plan Medium Density Residential-16 zoning district located north of Cartier Street, Assessor's Parcel Numbers 059-430-012 and 059-430-037 (File No. PL22-0024) made by Councilmember Mark Joseph, seconded by Councilmember Pierre Washington, and CARRIED by roll call vote.

Ayes: Councilmember Mariam Aboudamous, Councilmember Mark Joseph, Councilmember Pierre Washington, Vice Mayor David Oro, Mayor Leon Garcia Nays: None
Abstain: None

Absent: None
Excused: None

BUSINESS

14. Proposed Staffing FY 24/25 and Beyond
Council received a staff report and presentation on employee satisfaction surveys, organizational assessments and proposed staffing for Fiscal Year FY 24/25 and beyond from City Manager Jason Holley. Mayor Garcia called for public comments. Written comments: none. Oral comments:

Hugh Marquez was called to speak. The public comments period was closed. This item requires no Council action.
15 Councilmember Mariam Aboudamous left the meeting at 8:00 p.m.

15. Law Enforcement Services Contract Amendment
Council received a staff and presentation on the Law Enforcement Services Contract Amendment report from Police Chief Rick Greenberg. Mayor Garcia called for public comments. Written comments: none. Oral comments: Beth Marcus was called to speak; Fran Lemos was called to speak; Brando Cruz was called to speak. The public comments period was closed.

Action: Motion to adopt Adopted Resolution 2024-31 approving Amendment 20 (Agreement 2024-53) to the Agreement No. 200005B (previously known as Agreement No. 3220) with the Napa County Sheriff's Office for Law Enforcement Services for the period of July 1, 2024, through June 30, 2027. made by Councilmember Pierre Washington, seconded by Vice Mayor David Oro, and CARRIED by roll call vote.

Ayes: Councilmember Mark Joseph, Councilmember Pierre Washington, Vice Mayor David Oro, Mayor Leon Garcia
Nays: None
Abstain: None

Absent: Councilmember Mariam Aboudamous
Excused: None

MANAGEMENT AND STAFF ORAL REPORTS
Council received oral updates from Parks & Recreation Director Alexandra Ikeda and Finance Director Juan Gomez.

MAYOR/COUNCIL COMMENTS AND COMMITTEE REPORTS
The mayor and council members provided oral reports and announced items of community interest.

FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

16. Future Agenda Items of Note
Action: Motion to add to a future agenda, an item regarding Parks and Community Services Commissioner David Garcia-Arreola made by Vice Mayor David Oro,seconded by Councilmember Pierre Washington, and CARRIED by roll call vote.

Ayes: Councilmember Mark Joseph, Councilmember Pierre Washington, Vice Mayor David Oro, Mayor Leon Garcia
Nays: None
Abstain: None

Absent: Councilmember Mariam Aboudamous
Excused: None
16 ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 8:37 p.m.

CERTIFICATION
Respectfully Submitted,
_____________________________________
Taresa Geilfuss, City Clerk
17 William D. Ross
David P. Schwarz
Kypros G. Hostetter
Christina M. Bellardo
Law Offices of
William D. Ross
400 Lambert Avenue
Palo Alto, California 94306
Telephone: (650) 843-8080
www.lawross.com
Los Angeles Office:
11420 Santa Monica Blvd
#25532
Los Angeles, CA 90025
File No: 199/6
April 22, 2024

VIA E-MAIL
The Honorable Leon Garcia, Mayor
and Members of the City Council
City of American Canyon
4381 Broadway, Suite 201
American Canyon, CA 94503
Re: Report Upon Return from Closed Session; Regular City Council Closed Session Meeting of the American Canyon City Council of April 17, 2024 Dear Mayor Garcia and Members of the City Council:

This communication sets forth reportable action, if any, of the City Council (“Council”) of the City of American Canyon (“City”), consistent with provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Opening Meeting Act (Government Code Section 54950, et seq.) resulting from the Closed Session of the Regular City Council Closed Session Meeting of April 17, 2024, consistent with Government Code Section 54957.1.

At 5:31 p.m. Mayor Garcia convened the Council in Open Session to determine if there were any comments on the matters agendized for Closed Session, and after concluding that there were none, adjourned to Closed Session at 5:31 p.m. Councilmember Aboudamous participated remotely consistent with the provisions of AB 2449.

There were two matters agendized for City Closed Session consideration:

1. Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation
Authorized Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1):
a. City of American Canyon v. City of Vallejo, et al.
(Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 34-2022-00327471);
b. City of American Canyon v. Leon Dale Schmidt, (Napa
County Superior Court Case No. 22CV001041 and
23PR00161);
18 The Honorable Leon Garcia, Mayor
and Members of the City Council
April 22, 2024

c. City of Vallejo v. City of American Canyon et al. (Napa County Superior Court Case No. 23CV000510) [Giovannoni
Project];
d. City of Vallejo v. City of American Canyon et al. (Napa County Superior Court Case No. 23CV001600)
[Paoli/Watson Lane Annexation].
e. City of Vallejo v. City of American Canyon et al. (Napa County Superior Court Case No. 24CV000544) [Measure
K].

2. Conference with Legal Counsel – Anticipated Litigation Authorized Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2) Three (3) Matters.

With respect to Closed Session Agenda Item No. 1.a., there was no reportable action under the common law attorney-client privilege and that provided by Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).

With respect to Closed Session Agenda Item No. 1.b., there was no other reportable action under the common law attorney-client privilege and that provided by Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).

With respect to Closed Session Agenda Item No. 1.c. there was no other reportable action under the common law attorney-client privilege and that provided by Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).

With respect to Closed Session Agenda Item No. 1.d., there was no reportable action under the common law attorney-client privilege and that provided by Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).

With respect to Closed Session Agenda Item No. 1.e., there was no reportable action under the common law attorney-client privilege and that provided by Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).

With respect to the City of Vallejo (“Vallejo”) initiated matters of litigation, Closed Session Agenda Item No. 2.c.,d. and e., there was direction (4–0, with Councilmember Joseph conceding in the action upon arriving in the Closed Session) to pursue Public Records Act Requests and related litigation demands to determine how Vallejo authorized the initiation of each of the litigation matters, including whether there was an express delegation by the Vallejo City Council to the Vallejo City Attorney to exercise discretion in initiating pursuing the litigation 19 The Honorable Leon Garcia, Mayor
and Members of the City Council
April 22, 2024

matters.

Also, requests were directed concerning the amount of Vallejo taxpayer funds expended for the referenced litigation, as well as the amount of money expended as reimbursement to the State of California for additional law enforcement services. Upon obtaining some or all of the information requested, the City Attorney and City Manager are directed to publicize the information in the most effective manner to make clear the motivation and amount of expenditures of Vallejo in the collective litigation. Except as indicated, there was no other reportable action under the common law attorney-client privilege and that provided by Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2).

Your Council concluded the Closed Session at 6:18 p.m.

In Open Session, it was indicated that a written report upon return from Closed Session consistent with Government Code Section 54957.1, would be prepared concerning the matters agendized for Closed Session.

This communication should be reviewed under the Consent portion of the Agenda of your next Regular or Special City Council Meeting.

Should you have questions concerning this Report, it may be taken off the Consent calendar when agendized in the future, or our office may be contacted in the interim.

Very truly yours,
William D. Ross
City Attorney
WDR:jf
cc: Jason B. Holley, City Manager
Maria Ojeda, Assistant City Manager
Taresa Geilfuss, City Clerk
Cherri Walton, Deputy City Clerk
20 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
MAY 7, 2024

STAFF REPORT

CONSENT
ITEM NUMBER: 12.

TITLE
Prohousing Incentive Program

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a Resolu)on authorizing applica)on to and par)cipa)on in the Prohousing Designa)on Program.

CONTACT
Brent Cooper, AICP, Community Development Director

BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS
The State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) is helping to alleviate California’s housing crisis through a "Prohousing Incen)ve Program" (PIP). Local communi)es that apply for, and achieve, a Prohousing Designa)on by HCD are rewarded with an impac6ul award grant in the form of funding to accelerate affordable housing production and preservation.

The PIP is funded by the Building Homes and Jobs Trust Fund with the goal of crea)ng and conserving affordable housing. Established by Chapter 364, Statutes of 2017 (SB 2, Atkins), HCD will award PIP funds to eligible jurisdic)ons with Prohousing Designa)on. Addi)onal bonus dollars will be made available based on a jurisdic)on’s Prohousing Designa)on Program applica)on score. A list of jurisdic)ons that were awarded funds under the first round of awards is included as A>achment

2. On January 23, 2024, HCD released the NOFA for the second round of the Prohousing Incen)ve Program (PIP Round 2). PIP Round 2 makes about $9.5 million available for jurisdic)ons that receive a Prohousing Designation.

The application evaluates Prohousing Policies using the following four scoring categories:

1. Favorable Zoning and Land Use,

2. Acceleration of Housing Production Timeframes,

3. Reduction of Construction and Development Costs, and

4. Providing Financial Subsidies.

Applica)ons must demonstrate that the City (1) has a cer)fied Housing Element, (2), has adopted a 21 Resolu)on to authorize the Prohousing applica)on, and (3) has enacted or proposed at least one policy that significantly contributes to the Accelera)on of Housing Produc)on in each of the four categories. A Prohousing Designa)on requires a total score of 30 points or more across all four categories. A draF Resolu)on, the content of which is provided by the Prohousing Applica)on, is included as Attachment 1.

A Prohousing Designa)on award would be a proud achievement for American Canyon. Among California’s 480 local jurisdic)ons, only 47 have been designated Prohousing. A list of jurisdic)ons with this designa)on is included as A>achment 3. A draF copy of the applica)on is included as Attachment 4.

On April 25, 2024, the Planning Commission conducted a workshop on the Prohousing Applica)on.

Council approval of the Resolu)on will lead to staff submiHng the applica)on to HCD prior to June 2024.

COUNCIL PRIORITY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS
Organizational Effectiveness: "Deliver exemplary government services."

FISCAL IMPACT
A successful Prohousing Designa)on would qualify the City to receive funds for affordable housing.

At this )me, it is not possible to determine the amount of funds the City would poten)ally be entitled to receive.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
N/A
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution Prohousing Authorization

2. PIP-2023-Awardees

3. Prohousing Designated Jurisdictions 4.19.24

4. Draft Prohousing Application 2024.pdf
22 RESOLUTION NO. 2024- ___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON AUTHORIZING

APPLICATION TO AND PARTICIPATION IN THE PROHOUSING DESIGNATION PROGRAM WHEREAS, Government Code section 65589.9 established the Prohousing Designation Program (“Program”), which creates incentives for jurisdictions that are compliant with state housing element requirements and that have enacted Prohousing local policies; and WHEREAS, such jurisdictions will be designated Prohousing, and, as such, will receive additional points or other preference during the scoring of their competitive Applications for specified housing and infrastructure funding; and
WHEREAS, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (“Department”) has adopted regulations (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 25, § 6600 et seq.) to implement the Program (“Program Regulations”), as authorized by Government Code section 65589.9, subdivision (d); and WHEREAS, the City of American Canyon (“Applicant”) desires to submit an Application for a Prohousing Designation (“Application”).

THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED THAT:

1. Applicant is hereby authorized and directed to submit an Application to the Department.

2. Applicant acknowledges and confirms that it is currently in compliance with applicable state housing law.

3. Applicant acknowledges and confirms that it will continue to comply with applicable housing laws and to refrain from enacting laws, developing policies, or taking other local governmental actions that may or do inhibit or constrain housing production. Examples of such local laws, policies, and actions include moratoriums on development; local voter approval requirements related to housing production; downzoning; and unduly restrictive or onerous zoning regulations, development standards, or permit procedures. Applicant further acknowledges and confirms that the Prohousing Policies in its Application comply with its duty to Affirmatively Further Fair Housing pursuant to Government Code sections 8899.50 and 65583. Applicant further acknowledges and confirms that its general plan is in alignment with an adopted sustainable communities strategy pursuant to Public Resources Code sections 21155- 21155.4.

Applicant further acknowledges and confirms that its policies for the treatment of homeless encampments on public property comply do and will continue to comply with the Constitution and that it has enacted best practices in its jurisdiction that are consistent with the United States Interagency Council on Homelessness’ “7 Principles for Addressing Encampments” (June 17, 2022, update).

4. If the Application is approved, Applicant is hereby authorized and directed to enter into, execute, and deliver all documents required or deemed necessary or appropriate to participate in the Program, and all amendments thereto (the “Program Documents”).

5. Applicant acknowledges and agrees that it shall be subject to the Application, the terms and conditions specified in the Program Documents, the Program Regulations, and any and all other applicable law.
23 6. The City Manager of the City of American Canyon is authorized to execute and deliver the Application and the Program Documents on behalf of the Applicant for participation in the Program.

PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council of the City of American Canyon held on the 7
th day of May, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
____________________________
Leon Garcia, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________ ___________________________ Taresa Geilfuss, CMC, City Clerk William D. Ross, City Attorney The undersigned, Jason B. Holley, City Manager, of Applicant, does hereby attest and certify that the foregoing is a true and full copy of a resolution of the Applicant’s governing body adopted at a duly convened meeting on the date above-mentioned, and that the resolution has not been altered, amended, or repealed.
_______________________________ ___________________________ SIGNATURE: DATE:

NAME: Jason B. Holley TITLE: City Manager
24 Prohousing Incentive Pilot (PIP) Program Awardee List, NOFA issued 12/15/2022 This sheet contains a list of awardees and represents HCD's funding distribution methodology for PIP funds. For the competitive funding methodology, see PIP Guidelines Section 400. In the event of a Prohousing Designation Score tie (i.e. two ore more applicants have the same score), funding priority is given to the jurisdiction with a smaller population size based on the Department of Finance's population estimates as of January 1, 2021. See §403(B).

Final Awardees List, Including Geographic and Funding Categories: Geographic Categories, Spillover, and Spillover and Residual Set-Aside Amounts Spillover Combined with Remaining Geographic Funds Jurisdiction Award
City of El Cerrito $620,000.00
City of Emeryville $575,000.00
City of Fresno $2,064,891.45
City of Los Angeles $4,900,000.00
City of Needles $445,000.00
City of Oakland $2,390,000.00
City of Rancho Cordova $960,000.00
City of Redwood City $890,000.00
City of Riverside $2,440,000.00
City of Roseville $1,610,000.00
City of Sacramento $2,500,000.00
City of Salinas $1,650,000.00
City of San Diego $5,000,000.00
City of Stockton $2,370,000.00
City of Ukiah $455,000.00
City of West Sacramento $970,000.00
County of San Diego $2,400,000.00
County of Yuba $960,000.00
Region Total
Southern California $13,830,894.18
Bay Area $4,920,747.67
San Joaquin Valley $2,826,020.42
Sacramento Area $1,666,137.82
Central Coast $933,642.50
North State and Sierra Nevada $722,476.00
Total 25% Spillover Allocation $8,299,972.86
Total Spillover + remaining pots $9,013,196.53
Total NOFA Amount $33,199,891.45
Geographic Categories
Southern California $13.8M
PDP Score Applicant Award Amount
54 City of San Diego $5,000,000.00
44 City of Riverside $2,440,000.00
40 San Diego County $2,400,000.00
40 City of Los Angeles $3,990,894.18
Bay Area $4.9M
PDP Score Applicant Award Amount
59 City of Emeryville $575,000.00
39 City of Redwood City $890,000.00
39 City of Oakland $2,390,000.00
37 City of El Cerrito $620,000.00
San Joaquin Valley $2.8M
PDP Score Applicant Award Amount
37 City of Stockton $2,370,000.00
37 City of Fresno $456,020.42
Sacramento Area $1.66M
PDP Score Applicant Award Amount
64 City of Sacramento $1,666,137.82
Central Coast $0.9M
PDP Score Applicant Award Amount
58 City of Salinas $933,642.50
North State and Sierra Nevada $0.7M
PDP Score Applicant Award Amount
38 City of Ukiah $455,000.00
Residual Set-Aside (Spillover) and Remaining Geographic Category Funds Jurisdiction Region PDP Score $ From Spillover Final Award City of Sacramento Sacramento Area 64 $833,862.18 $2,500,000.00 City of Salinas Central Coast 58 $716,357.50 $1,650,000.00 City of West Sacramento Sacramento Area 47 $970,000.00 $970,000.00 Yuba County Sacramento Area 46 $960,000.00 $960,000.00
City of Rancho Cordova Sacramento Area 46 $960,000.00 $960,000.00 City of Roseville Sacramento Area 46 $1,610,000.00 $1,610,000.00 City of Los Angeles Southern California 40 $909,105.82 $4,900,000.00 City of Needles Southern California 37 $445,000.00 $445,000.00 City of Fresno San Joaquin Valley 37 $1,608,871.03 $2,064,891.45 ATTACHMENT 2
25 Prohousing Designated Jurisdictions
As of April 19, 2024, the following jurisdictions have earned a Prohousing Designation:
• City of Berkeley
• City of Brea
• City of Citrus Heights
• City of Crescent City
• City of El Cerrito
• City of Emeryville
• City of Eureka
• City of Fairfield
• City of Fontana
• City of Fresno
• City of Healdsburg
• City of Long Beach
• City of Los Angeles
• County of Los Angeles
• City of Moreno Valley
• City of Mountain View
• City of Needles
• City of Oakland
• City of Petaluma
• City of Pinole
• County of Placer
• City of Rancho Cordova
• City of Rancho Cucamonga
• City of Redwood City
• City of Richmond
• City of Riverside
• City of Rohnert Park
• City of Roseville
• City of Sacramento
• County of Sacramento
• City of Salinas
• City of San Diego
• City of San Luis Obispo
• City of Santa Cruz
• City of Santa Monica
• City of Santa Rosa
• County of San Diego
• County of Sonoma
• City of South Lake Tahoe
• City of South San Francisco
• City of Stockton
• County of Tulare
• City of Ukiah
• City of West Hollywood
• City of West Sacramento
• Town of Windsor
• County of Yuba
ATTACHMENT 3
26 Prohousing Designation Program Application
State of California
Governor Gavin Newsom
Melinda Grant, Undersecretary
Business, Consumer Services and Housing Agency
Gustavo Velasquez, Director
Department of Housing and Community Development
Megan Kirkeby, Deputy Director
Division of Housing Policy Development
2020 West El Camino, Suite 500
Sacramento, CA 95833
Website: https://www.hcd.ca.gov/community-development/prohousing Email: [email protected]
January 2024
ATTACHMENT 4
27 Prohousing Designation Program Application Package
Instructions
The applicant is applying for a Prohousing Designation under the Prohousing Designation Program (“Prohousing” or “Program”), which is administered by the Department of Housing and Community Development (“Department”) pursuant to Government Code section 65589.9.

The Program creates incentives for Jurisdictions that are compliant with State Housing Element Law and that have enacted Prohousing Policies. These incentives will take the form of additional points or other preference in the scoring of applications for competitive housing and infrastructure programs. The administrators of each such program will determine the value and form of the preference.

In order to be considered for a Prohousing Designation, the applicant must accurately complete all sections of this application, including any relevant appendices. The Department reserves the right to request additional clarifying information from the applicant.

This application is subject to Government Code section 65589.9 and to the regulations (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 25, § 6600 et seq.) adopted by the Department in promulgation thereof (“Regulations”).

All capitalized terms in this application shall have the meanings set forth in the Regulations.

All applicants must submit a complete, signed application package to the Department, in electronic format, in order to be considered for a Prohousing Designation. Please direct electronic copies of the completed application package to the following email address:

[email protected].

A complete application will include all items identified in the Application Checklist.

In relation to Appendix 1, the Formal Resolution for the Prohousing Designation Program, please use strikethrough and underline if proposing any modifications to the text of the Resolution. Please be aware, any sustentative deviations from the Formal Resolution may result in an incomplete application and will likely be subject to additional internal review and potential delays.

Appendix 2, the Proposed Policy Completion Schedule, applies only if an application includes proposed policies.

Appendix 3, Project Proposal Scoring Sheet and Sample Project Proposal Scoring Sheet, includes a blank template to be completed by the applicant as part of the application, as well as a Sample Project Proposal Scoring Sheet with an example of how this template may be completed.

Appendix 4 lists examples of Prohousing Policies with enhancement factors to aid applicants in understanding how enhancement factors may be applied.

Appendix 5 is where the applicant will include any additional information and supporting documentation for the application.
28 If you have questions regarding this application or the Program, or if you require technical assistance in preparing this application, please email [email protected]. 29 Application Checklist
Yes No
Application Information ☒ ☐
Certification and Acknowledgement ☒ ☐
The Legislative Information form is completed. ☒ ☐
The Threshold Requirements Checklist is completed. ☒ ☐
A duly adopted and certified Formal Resolution for the Prohousing Designation Program is included in the application package. (See Appendix 1 for the Formal Resolution for the Prohousing Designation Program form.)
☒ ☐
If applicable, the Proposed Policy Completion Schedule is completed. (See Appendix 2.)
☒ ☐
The Project Proposal Scoring Sheet is completed. (See Appendix 3 for the Project Proposal Scoring Sheet and the Sample Project Proposal Scoring Sheet.)
☒ ☐
Additional information and supporting documentation (Applicant to provide as Appendix 5)
☒ ☐
Application Information
Applicant (Jurisdiction): City of American Canyon
Applicant Mailing Address: 4381 Broadway, Suite 201
City: American Canyon
ZIP Code: 94503
Website: https://www.cityofamericancanyon.org/
Authorized Representative Name Jason B. Holley
Authorized Representative Title: City Manager
Phone: 707.647.4351
Email: [email protected]
Contact Person Name: Brent Cooper
Contact Person Title: Community Development Director
Phone: 707.647.4335
Email: [email protected]
Proposed Total Score (Based on
Appendix 3):
30 CERTIFICATION AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT
As authorized by the Formal Resolution for the Prohousing Designation Program (Resolution No. 2023-04), which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if set forth in full, I hereby submit this full and complete application on behalf of the applicant.

I certify that all information and representations set forth in this application are true and correct.

I further certify that any proposed Prohousing Policy identified herein will be enacted within two (2) years of the date of this application submittal.

I acknowledge that this application constitutes a public record under the California Public Records Act (Gov. Code, § 6250 et seq.) and is therefore subject to public disclosure by the Department.

Signature: __________________________________________
Name and Title: Brent Cooper, Community Development Director___ Date: _______________________________________________
Legislative Information
District Number Legislators Name(s)
State
Assembly
District
4 Cecilia M. Aguiar-Curry
State
Senate
District
3 Bill Dodd
Applicants can find their respective State Senate representatives at https://www.senate.ca.gov/, and their respective State Assembly representatives at https://www.assembly.ca.gov/
31 Threshold Requirements Checklist
The applicant meets the following threshold requirements in accordance with Section 6604 of the Regulations:

Yes No
The applicant is a Jurisdiction. ☒ ☐
The applicant has adopted a Compliant Housing Element. ☒ ☐ The applicant has submitted or will submit a legally sufficient Annual Progress Report prior to designation.
☒ ☐
The applicant has completed or agrees to complete, on or before the relevant statutory deadlines, any rezone program or zoning that is necessary to remain in compliance with Government Code sections 65583, subdivision (c)(1), and 65584.09, subdivision (a), and with California Coastal Commission certification where appropriate. ☒ ☐
The applicant is in compliance, at the time of the application, with applicable state housing law, including, but not limited to those included in Government Section 65585, subdivision (j); laws relating to the imposition of school facilities fees or other requirements (Gov. Code, § 65995 et seq.); Least Cost Zoning Law (Gov. Code, § 65913.1); Permit Streamlining Act (Gov. Code, § 65920 et seq.); and provisions relating to timeliness of CEQA processing by local governments in Public Resources Code sections 21080.1, 21080.2, and 21151.5(a). ☒ ☐
The applicant further acknowledges and confirms that its treatment of homeless encampments on public property complies with and will continue to comply with the constitutional rights of persons experiencing homelessness and that it has submitted a one-page summary to the Department demonstrating how the applicant has enacted best practices in their jurisdiction related to the treatment of unhoused individuals camping on public property, consistent with United States Interagency Council on Homelessness’ “7 Principles for Addressing Encampments,” (June 17, 2022 update), hereby incorporated by reference. ☒ ☐
The applicant has duly adopted and certified, by the applicant’s governing body, a Formal Resolution for the Prohousing Designation Program, which is hereby incorporated by reference. (A true and correct copy of the resolution is included in this application package.) ☒ ☐
32 Project Proposal
Category 1: Favorable Zoning and Land Use
Category Prohousing Policy Description Points
1A Sufficient sites, including rezoning, to accommodate 150 percent or greater of the current or draft RHNA, whichever is greater, by total and income category. These additional sites must be identified in the Jurisdiction’s housing element adequate sites inventory, consistent with Government Code section 65583, subdivisions (a)(3) and (c)(1). 3 1B Permitting missing middle housing uses (e.g., duplexes, triplexes, and fourplexes) by right in existing low-density, single-family residential zones in a manner that exceeds the requirements of SB 9 (Chapter 162, Statutes of 2021, Gov. Code, §§ 65852.21, 66411.7). 3 1C Sufficient sites, including rezoning, to accommodate 125 to 149 percent of the current or draft RHNA, whichever is greater, by total and income category. These points shall not be awarded if the applicant earns three points pursuant to Category (1)(A) above. These additional sites must be identified in the Jurisdiction’s housing element adequate sites inventory, consistent with Government Code section 65583, subdivisions (a)(3) and (c)(1).
2 1D Density bonus programs that allow additional density for additional affordability beyond minimum statutory requirements (Gov. Code, § 65915 et seq.).
2 1E Increasing allowable density in low-density, single-family residential areas beyond the requirements of state Accessory Dwelling Unit Law, (Gov. Code, §§ 65852.2, 65852.22) (e.g., permitting more than one converted ADU; one detached, new construction ADU; and one JADU per single-family lot), and in a manner that exceeds the requirements of SB 9 (Chapter 192, Statutes of 2021, Gov. Code, §§ 65852.21, 66411.7). These policies shall be separate from any qualifying policies under Category (1)(B).
2 1F Eliminating minimum parking requirements for residential development as authorized by Government Code section 65852.2; adopting vehicular parking ratios that are less than the relevant ratio thresholds at subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) of Gov. Code section 65915, subdivision (p)(1); or adopting maximum parking requirements at or less than ratios pursuant to Gov. Code section 65915, subdivision (p).
2 1G Zoning or incentives that are designed to increase affordable housing development in a range of types, including, but not limited to, large family units, Supportive Housing, housing for transition age foster youth, and deep affordability targeted for Extremely Low-Income Households in all parts of the Jurisdiction, with at least some of the zoning, other land use designation methods, or incentives being designed to increase affordable housing development in higher resource areas shown in the TCAC/HCD Opportunity Map, and with the Jurisdiction having confirmed that it considered and addressed potential environmental justice issues in adopting and implementing 2 33
this policy, especially in areas with existing industrial and polluting uses.
1H Zoning or other land use designation methods to allow for residential or mixed uses in one or more non-residential zones (e.g., commercial, light industrial). Qualifying non-residential zones do not include open space or substantially similar zones.
1 1I Modification of development standards and other applicable zoning provisions or land use designation methods to promote greater development intensity. Potential areas of focus include floor area ratio, height limits, minimum lot or unit sizes, setbacks, and allowable dwelling units per acre. These policies must be separate from any qualifying policies under Category (1)(B) above.
1 1J Establishment of a Workforce Housing Opportunity Zone, as defined in Government Code section 65620, or a Housing Sustainability District, as defined in Government Code section 66200.
1 1K Establishment of an inclusionary housing program requiring new developments to include housing affordable to and reserved for lowand very low-income households, consistent with the requirements of AB 1505 (Chapter 376, Statutes of 2017, Gov. Code, § 65850.01). 1 1L Other zoning and land use actions not described in Categories (A)-(K) of this section that measurably support the Acceleration of Housing Production.
1 34
Project Proposal
Category 2: Acceleration of Housing Production Timeframes Category Prohousing Policy Description Points
2A Establishment of ministerial approval processes for multiple housing types, including, for example, single-family, multifamily and mixed-use housing.
3 2B Acceleration of Housing Production through the establishment of streamlined, program-level CEQA analysis and certification of general plans, community plans, specific plans with accompanying Environmental Impact Reports (EIR), and related documents. 2 2C Documented practice of streamlining housing development at the project level, such as by enabling a by-right approval process or by utilizing statutory and categorical exemptions as authorized by applicable law, (e.g., Pub. Resources Code, §§ 21155.1, 21155.4, 21159.24, 21159.25; Gov. Code, § 65457; Cal Code Regs., tit. 14, §§ 15303, 15332; Pub. Resources Code, §§ 21094.5, 21099, 21155.2, 21159.28).
2 2D Establishment of permitting processes that take less than four months to complete. Policies under this category must address all approvals necessary to issue building permits.
2 2E Absence or elimination of public hearings for projects consistent with zoning and the general plan.
2 2F Priority permit processing or reduced plan check times for homes affordable to Lower-Income Households.
1 2G Establishment of consolidated or streamlined permit processes that minimize the levels of review and approval required for projects, and that are consistent with zoning regulations and the general plan. 1 2H Absence, elimination, or replacement of subjective development and design standards with objective development and design standards that simplify zoning clearance and improve approval certainty and timing.
1 2I Establishment of one-stop-shop permitting processes or a single point of contact where entitlements are coordinated across city approval functions (e.g., planning, public works, building) from entitlement application to certificate of occupancy.
1 2J Priority permit processing or reduced plan check times for ADUs/JADUs or multifamily housing.
1 2K Establishment of a standardized application form for all entitlement applications.
1 2L Documented practice of publicly posting status updates on project permit approvals on the internet.
1 2M Limitation on the total number of hearings for any project to three or fewer. Applicants that accrue points pursuant to category (2)(E) are not eligible for points under this category.
1 2N Other policies not described in Categories (2)(A)-(M) of this section that quantifiably decrease production timeframes or promote the streamlining of approval processes.
1 35
Project Proposal
Category 3: Reduction of Construction and Development Costs Category Prohousing Policy Description Points
3A Waiver or significant reduction of development impact fees for residential development with units affordable to Lower-Income Households. This provision does not include fees associated with the provision of housing affordable to Lower-Income Households (e.g., inclusionary in lieu fees, affordable housing impact fees, and commercial linkage fees).
3 3B Adoption of policies that result in less restrictive requirements than Government Code sections 65852.2 and 65852.22 to reduce barriers for property owners to create ADUs/JADUs. Examples of qualifying policies include, but are not limited to, development standards improvements, permit processing improvements, dedicated ADU/JADU staff, technical assistance programs, and pre-approved ADU/JADU design packages.
2 3C Adoption of other fee reduction strategies separate from Category (3)(A), including fee deferrals and reduced fees for housing for persons with special needs. This provision does not include fees associated with the provision of housing affordable to Lower-Income Households (e.g., inclusionary in lieu fees, affordable impact fees and commercial linkage fees).
1 3D Accelerating innovative housing production through innovative housing types (e.g., manufactured homes, recreational vehicles, park models, community ownership, and other forms of social housing) that reduce development costs.
1 3E Measures that reduce costs for transportation-related infrastructure or programs that encourage active modes of transportation or other alternatives to automobiles. Qualifying policies include, but are not limited to, publicly funded programs to expand sidewalks or protect bike/micro-mobility lanes, creation of on-street parking for bikes, transit-related improvements, or establishment of carshare programs. 1 3F Adoption of universal design ordinances pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 17959.
1 3G Establishment of pre-approved or prototype plans for missing middle housing types (e.g., duplexes, triplexes, and fourplexes) in lowdensity, single-family residential areas. 1 3H Adoption of ordinances that reduce barriers, beyond existing law, for the development of housing affordable to Lower-Income Households. 1 3I Other policies not described in Categories (3)(A)-(H) of this section that quantifiably reduce construction or development costs. 1 36
Project Proposal
Category 4: Providing Financial Subsidies
Category Prohousing Policy Description Points
4A Establishment of a housing fund or contribution of funds towards affordable housing through proceeds from approved ballot measures.
2 4B Establishment of local housing trust funds or collaboration on a regional housing trust fund, which include the Jurisdiction’s own funding contributions. The Jurisdiction must contribute to the local or regional housing trust fund regularly and significantly. For the purposes of this Category, “regularly” shall be defined as at least annually, and “significant” contributions shall be determined based on the impact the contributions have in accelerating the production of affordable housing.
2 4C Demonstration of regular use or planned regular use of funding (e.g., federal, state, or local) for preserving assisted units at-risk of conversion to market rate uses and conversion of market rate uses to units with affordability restrictions (e.g., acquisition/rehabilitation).

For the purposes of this category, “regular use” can be demonstrated through the number of units preserved annually by utilizing this funding source.
2 4D Provide grants or low-interest loans for ADU/JADU construction affordable to Lower- and Moderate-Income Households.
2 4E A comprehensive program that complies with the Surplus Land Act (Gov. Code, § 54220 et seq.) and that makes publicly owned land available for affordable housing, or for multifamily housing projects with the highest feasible percentage of units affordable to Lower Income Households. A qualifying program may utilize mechanisms such as land donations, land sales with significant write-downs, or below-market land leases.
2 4F Establishment of an Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District or similar local financing tool that, to the extent feasible, directly supports housing developments in an area where at least 20 percent of the residences will be affordable to Lower-Income Households. 2 4G Prioritization of local general funds to accelerate the production of housing affordable to Lower-Income Households.
2 4H Directed residual redevelopment funds to accelerate the production of affordable housing.
1 4I Development and regular (at least biennial) use of a housing subsidy pool, local or regional trust fund, or other similar funding source sufficient to facilitate and support the development of housing affordable to Lower-Income Households.
1 37
4J Prioritization of local general funds for affordable housing. This point shall not be awarded if the applicant earns two points pursuant to Category (4)(G).
1 4K Providing operating subsidies for permanent Supportive Housing. 1 4L Providing subsidies for housing affordable to Extremely Low-Income Households.
1 4M Other policies not described in Categories (4)(A)-(L) of this section that quantifiably promote, develop, or leverage financial resources for housing affordable to Lower-Income Households.
1 38
Project Proposal
Enhancement Factors
The Department shall utilize enhancement factors to increase the point scores of Prohousing Policies. An individual Prohousing Policy may not use more than one enhancement factor.

Each Prohousing Policy will receive extra points for enhancement factors in accordance with the chart below.

Category Prohousing Policy Description Points
1 The policy represents one element of a unified, multi-faceted strategy to promote multiple planning objectives, such as efficient land use, access to public transportation, housing affordable to Lower-Income Households, climate change solutions, and/or hazard mitigation.
2 2 Policies that promote development consistent with the state planning priorities pursuant to Government Code section 65041.1. 1 3 Policies that diversify planning and target community and economic development investments (housing and non-housing) toward placebased strategies for community revitalization and equitable quality of life in lower opportunity areas. Such areas include, but are not limited to, Low Resource and High Segregation & Poverty areas designated in the most recently updated TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps, and disadvantaged communities pursuant to Health and Safety Code sections 39711 and 39715 (California Senate Bill 535 (2012).
1 4 Policies that go beyond state law requirements in reducing displacement of Lower-Income Households and conserving existing housing stock that is affordable to Lower-Income Households. 1 5 Rezoning and other policies that support intensification of residential development in Location Efficient Communities.
1 6 Rezoning and other policies that result in a net gain of housing capacity while concurrently mitigating development impacts on or from Environmentally Sensitive or Hazardous Areas.
1 7 Zoning policies, including inclusionary housing policies, that increase housing choices and affordability, particularly for Lower-Income Households, in High Resource and Highest Resource areas, as designated in the most recently updated TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps.
1 8 Other policies that involve meaningful actions towards Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing outside of those required pursuant to Government Code sections 65583, subdivision (c)(10), and 8899.50, including, but not limited to, outreach campaigns, updated zoning codes, and expanded access to financing support.
1 39
Project Proposal Scoring Sheet Instructions
The Department shall validate applicants’ scores based on the extent to which each identified Prohousing Policy contributes to the Acceleration of Housing Production. The Department shall assess applicants’ Prohousing Policies in accordance with statutory requirements and the Regulations.

The Department shall further assess applicants’ Prohousing Policies using the following four scoring categories: Favorable Zoning and Land Use, Acceleration of Housing Production Timeframes, Reduction of Construction and Development Costs, and Providing Financial Subsidies. Applicants shall demonstrate that they have enacted or proposed at least one policy that significantly contributes to the Acceleration of Housing Production in each of the four categories. A Prohousing Designation requires a total score of 30 points or more across all four categories.

Instructions
Please utilize one row of the Scoring Sheet for each Prohousing Policy. • Category Number: Select the relevant category number from the relevant Project Proposal list in this application. Where appropriate, applicants may utilize a category number more than once. • Concise Written Description of Prohousing Policy: Set forth a brief description of the enacted or proposed Prohousing Policy.
• Enacted or Proposed: Identify the Prohousing Policy as enacted or proposed. For proposed Prohousing Policies, please complete Appendix 2: Proposed Policy Completion Schedule. • Documentation Type: For enacted Prohousing Policies, identify the relevant documentary evidence (e.g., resolution, zoning code provisions). For proposed Prohousing Policies, identify the documentation which shows that implementation of the policy is pending.
• Web Links/Electronic Copies: Insert the Web link(s) to the relevant documentation or indicate that electronic copies of the documentation have been attached to this application as Appendix 5. • Points: Enter the appropriate number of points using the relevant Project Proposal list in this application. • Enhancement Category Number (optional): If utilizing an enhancement factor for a particular Prohousing Policy, enter the appropriate category number using the relevant Project Proposal list in this application. • Enhancement Points (optional): If utilizing an enhancement factor for a particular Prohousing Policy, enter the point(s) for that Prohousing Policy.
• Total Points: Add the enhancement point(s) to the Prohousing Policy’s general point score. 40 Formal Resolution for the Prohousing Designation Program (New 01/24)
Appendix 1: Formal Resolution for the Prohousing Designation Program Formal Resolution for the PROHOUSING Designation Program RESOLUTION NO. [INSERT RESOLUTION NUMBER]

A RESOLUTION OF THE GOVERNING BODY OF
[INSERT THE NAME OF THE CITY OR COUNTY] AUTHORIZING APPLICATION TO

AND PARTICIPATION IN THE PROHOUSING DESIGNATION PROGRAM WHEREAS, Government Code section 65589.9 established the Prohousing Designation Program (“Program”), which creates incentives for jurisdictions that are compliant with state housing element requirements and that have enacted Prohousing local policies; and WHEREAS, such jurisdictions will be designated Prohousing, and, as such, will receive additional points or other preference during the scoring of their competitive Applications for specified housing and infrastructure funding; and
WHEREAS, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (“Department”) has adopted regulations (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 25, § 6600 et seq.) to implement the Program (“Program Regulations”), as authorized by Government Code section 65589.9, subdivision (d); and
WHEREAS, the [INSERT THE NAME OF THE CITY OR COUNTY]
(“Applicant”) desires to submit an Application for a Prohousing Designation (“Application”).

THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED THAT:

1. Applicant is hereby authorized and directed to submit an Application to the Department.

2. Applicant acknowledges and confirms that it is currently in compliance with applicable state housing law.

3. Applicant acknowledges and confirms that it will continue to comply with applicable housing laws and to refrain from enacting laws, developing policies, or taking other local governmental actions that may or do inhibit or constrain housing production.

Examples of such local laws, policies, and actions include moratoriums on development; local voter approval requirements related to housing production; downzoning; and unduly restrictive or onerous zoning regulations, development standards, or permit procedures. Applicant further acknowledges and confirms that the Prohousing Policies in its Application comply with its duty to Affirmatively Further Fair Housing pursuant to Government Code sections 8899.50 and 65583. Applicant further acknowledges and confirms that its general plan is in alignment with an adopted sustainable communities strategy pursuant to Public Resources Code sections 21155- 21155.4. Applicant further acknowledges and confirms that its policies for the treatment of homeless encampments on public property comply do and will continue to comply with the Constitution and that it has enacted best practices in its jurisdiction 41 that are consistent with the United States Interagency Council on Homelessness’ “7 Principles for Addressing Encampments” (June 17, 2022, update).

4. If the Application is approved, Applicant is hereby authorized and directed to enter into, execute, and deliver all documents required or deemed necessary or appropriate to participate in the Program, and all amendments thereto (the “Program Documents”).

5. Applicant acknowledges and agrees that it shall be subject to the Application, the terms and conditions specified in the Program Documents, the Program Regulations, and any and all other applicable law.

6. [INSERT THE TITLE OF THE APPLICANT’S AUTHORIZED
SIGNATORY] is authorized to execute and deliver the Application and the Program Documents on behalf of the Applicant for participation in the Program.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2024, by the following vote:

AYES: [Insert #] NOES: [Insert #] ABSENT: [Insert #] ABSTAIN: [Insert #] The undersigned, [INSERT NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNATORY] of Applicant, does hereby attest and certify that the foregoing is a true and full copy of a resolution of the Applicant’s governing body adopted at a duly convened meeting on the date above-mentioned, and that the resolution has not been altered, amended, or repealed.

SIGNATURE: DATE:

NAME: TITLE:
42 Appendix 2: Proposed Policy Completion Schedule
Category
Number
Concise Written Description of
Proposed Policy
Key Milestones and
Milestone Dates
Anticipated
Completion
Date
Notes
43 Appendix 3: Project Proposal Scoring Sheet and Sample Project Proposal Scoring Sheet Project Proposal Scoring Sheet
Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation Type
(e.g., resolution,
zoning code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
Sample Project Proposal Scoring Sheet
Note: This is a Sample Project Proposal Scoring Sheet; an actual submission may include more specificity when an applicant completes the “Concise Written Description of Prohousing Policy.” Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
1A Sufficient sites,
including rezoning, to
accommodate 150
percent or greater of
the current or draft
RHNA, whichever is
greater, by total and
income category.

These additional sites
must be identified in the
Jurisdiction’s housing
element adequate sites
inventory, consistent
E Certified Housing
Element
https://portal.la
serfiche.com/
Portal/DocVie
w.aspx?id=15
0755&repo=rf53bdda4
3 1 2 5
44 Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
with Government Code
section 65583,
subdivisions (a)(3) and
(c)(1).

The City’s RHNA is 622
units. The approved
and planned pipeline
units equals 1,539
dwelling units which
equals 250% over the
RHNA allocation. In
addition, the City has
an additional
entitlement with two
specific plans for a
remaining additional
capacity for 1,247
dwelling units.
1G Zoning that that is
designed to increase
affordable housing for a
range of types and for
extremely low-income
households.

On April 2nd 2024, the
Council approved
second reading of an
ordinance to:

1. Allow low
barrier navigation
centers as a permitted
use in the Community
Commercial (CC)
zoning district in
compliance with
E Zoning code Electronic
copy attached
2 2
45 Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
Government Code
Section 65660 and
65668.

2. Allow small
residential care facilities
as a permitted use in
the Rural Residential
Estate Hillside (RRH)
zoning district in
compliance with
Government Code
Section 65583.

3. Allow
manufactured housing
subject only to the
restrictions of singlefamily uses.

4. Update Floor
Area Ratio (FAR)
standards in the
Neighborhood
Commercial (CN) and
Community
Commercial (CC)
zoning districts to allow
a minimum Floor Area
Ratio (FAR) of 1.0 for
projects with three to
seven units or 1.25 for
projects with eight to 10
units.
46 Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points

5. Remove the
conditional use permit
requirement for large
farm employee housing
in the Community
Commercial CC zoning
district.

6. Update the
Accessory Dwelling
Unit Ordinance
(American Canyon
Municipal Code
(ACMC) Chapter 19.39)
consistent with an
October 4, 2023 State
of California
Department of Housing
and Community
Development (HCD)
letter.
1H Modified development
standards/other
applicable zoning
provisions to allow for
residential uses in nonresidential zones (light
industrial).

Residential uses up to
20 du/acre are allowed
in the Community
Commercial zoning
district and
Neighborhood
E Zoning code
Broadway District
Specific Plan
Zoning
Ordinance
https://law.city
ofamericancan
yon.org/us/ca/
cities/america
ncanyon/code/1

9.11.020
Broadway
District
Specific Plan
1 6 1 2
47 Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
Commercial zoning
district.

Residential uses up to
35 du/acre are allowed
in the Broadway District
Business Park, Local
Serving Mixed Use, and
Downtown Core zoning
districts.
https://portal.la
serfiche.com/
Portal/DocVie
w.aspx?id=65
293&repo=rf53bdda4
1I Modification of
development standards
and other applicable
zoning provisions or
land use designation
methods to promote
greater development
intensity. Potential
areas of focus include
floor area ratio, height
limits, minimum lot or
unit sizes, setbacks,
and allowable dwelling
units per acre. These
policies must be
separate from any
qualifying policies
under Category (1)(B)
above.

Watson Ranch Specific
Plan High Density
Zoning has no density
limit.

E Specific Plan Watson Ranch
Specific Plan
https://portal.la
serfiche.com/
Portal/DocVie
w.aspx?id=60
611&repo=rf53bdda4
1 1
48 Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
1K Establishment of an
inclusionary housing
program requiring new
developments to
include housing
affordable to and
reserved for low- and
very low-income
households, consistent
with the requirements
of AB 1505 (Chapter
376, Statutes of 2017,
Gov. Code, §
65850.01).

Zoning Code Chapter

19.28 requires Rental
projects subject to the
provisions of this
chapter shall provide a
number of inclusionary
units equal to at least
five percent of
applicable project units
(per this chapter) at
prices or rents
affordable to very lowincome households,
five percent affordable
to low-income
households, and five
percent to moderate
income households.

E Zoning Code
Chapter 19.28
Inclusionary
Housing
Ordinance
https://law.city
ofamericancan
yon.org/us/ca/
cities/america
ncanyon/code/1

9.28 1 1
49 Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
Ownership projects
subject to the
provisions of this
chapter shall provide a
number of inclusionary
units equal to at least
ten percent of
applicable project units
(per this chapter) at
prices or rents
affordable to lowerincome households.
1L Other zoning and land
use actions that
measurably support the
Acceleration of Housing
Production.

Since 2020, the City
implemented an on-line
application submittal
and processing system.

E Virtual City
Hall On-Line
Application
1 1
2A Establishment of
ministerial approval
processes for multiple
housing types,
including, for example,
single-family,
multifamily and mixeduse housing.

The Design Permit
application has been
used to identify the
P Zoning Code Design Permit
Application
https://law.city
ofamericancan
yon.org/us/ca/
cities/america
ncanyon/code/1

9.41 3 3
50 Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
project’s compliance
with zoning code and
other adopted objective
standards. The city’s
record of application
review shows that there
has not been any
subjective judgment in
deciding whether or
how the project should
be carried out.

Housing Element
Implementation
Measure C specifically
identified the need to
revise the Design
Permit application to
remove subjective
language.
2B Streamlined programlevel CEQA analysis
and certification of
general plans,
community plans,
specific plans with
accompanying
Environmental Impact
Reports (EIR), and
related documents.

E Broadway District
Specific Plan
Program EIR
Watson Ranch
Program EIR
Broadway
District
Specific Plan
Program EIR:
https://portal.la
serfiche.com/
Portal/DocVie
w.aspx?id=11
4163&repo=rf53bdda4
Watson Ranch
Program EIR:
https://app.las
erfiche.com/la
2 2
51 Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
serfiche/DocVi
ew.aspx?repo
=rf53bdda4&cus
tomerId=7472
84181&id=752
42 2C The City has a
documented practice of
streamlining housing
development at the
project level, such as
by enabling a by-right
approval process or by
utilizing statutory and
categorical exemptions
as authorized by
applicable law, (e.g.,
Pub. Resources Code,
§§ 21155.1, 21155.4,
21159.24, 21159.25;
Gov. Code, § 65457;
Cal Code Regs., tit. 14,
§§ 15303, 15332; Pub.

Resources Code, §§
21094.5, 21099,
21155.2, 21159.28).

Projects include: Napa
Cove Affordable
Apartment Project was
consistent with the
Broadway District
Specific Plan EIR and
E Resolution 2 2
52 Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
Categorically Exempt
from CEQA.

Lemos Pointe
Apartments, Artisan
Single Family, Harvest
Single Family,
Promontory Single
Family and ADU, NV
Ruins & Gardens
Condominiums were all
deemed consistent with
the Watson Ranch
Program EIR.
2G Consolidated permit
processes that
minimize the levels of
review and approval
required for projects.

The City uses Program
EIRs for residential
projects and Negative
Declarations for multiphased projects (i.e.:

GPA/Zone Change,
Design Permit,
Subdivision).

Examples include
Broadway District
Specific Plan PEIR,
Watson Ranch PEIR,
and Oat Hill Residential
Negative Declaration
E Program EIR,
Negative
Declaration
Electronic
copy attached
1 1
53 Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
2I Established a one-stopshop permitting
process.

P Resolution Electronic
copy attached
1 1
2K Establishment of a
standardized
application form for all
entitlement
applications.

E Application Form Entitlement
Application
form:
https://portal.la
serfiche.com/f
0791/forms/pl
anningentitlem
ent
1 1
2L Documented practice of
publicly posting status
updates on project
approvals on the
internet.

All proposed, approved,
and projects under
construction are
identified on our
website.

E Project Status
Posting Webpage
Status Posting
Webpage:
https://www.cit
yofamericanca
nyon.org/gove
rnment/comm
unitydevelopment/d
evelopmentprojects
1 1
2N Other actions that
quantifiably decrease
production timeframes.

The City has a
completely on-line
development
application and building
permit processing
system.

E Zoning code Online
Planning
Entitlement
Webpage:
https://portal.la
serfiche.com/f
0791/forms/pl
anningentitlem
ent
1 1
54 Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
In addition, the City has
a standing weekly
“Project Review
Committee” meeting of
all agency staff
(Planning, Fire, Public
Works, Police, Weights
and Measures, School
District, Water and
Sewer Agency, Building
& Safety) to meet with
applicants, discuss
projects, maintain
timeframes, and
resolve issues related
to development and
housing.

Permit
Processing
Portal
Webpage:
https://www.cit
yofamericanca
nyon.org/gove
rnment/virtualcityhall/buildingconstructionvirtualservices Sample
Project
Review
Committee
Meeting
Agenda
Electronic
copy attached
3B Adopted policies that
result in less restrictive
requirements than
Government Code
sections 65852.2 and
65852.22.

The City is a member of
the Napa Sonoma ADU
Center and has
authorized preE Membership in
Napa Sonoma ADU
Center.

Napa Sonoma
ADU Center
Website:
https://napaso
nomaadu.org/
2 2
55 Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
approved ADU design
packages
4B Local housing trust
funds.

The City adopted an
affordable housing
nexus fee assessed on
new non-residential
development and on
residential development
when the applicant
demonstrates that onsite inclusionary is
infeasible.
.

E Resolution https://portal.la
serfiche.com/
Portal/DocVie
w.aspx?id=41
635&repo=rf53bdda4
2 2
4D Provide grants or lowinterest loans for

ADU/JADU
construction affordable
to Lower- and
Moderate-Income
Households.

In partnership with the
city of Napa, American
Canyon allocated (SB
2) Permanent Local
Housing Allocation
(PLHA) program funds
for technical assistance
and below market rate
forgivable/deferred
financing to create ADU
E Resolution Website
Resolution
https://portal.la
serfiche.com/
Portal/DocVie
w.aspx?id=69
505&repo=rf53bdda4
2 2
56 Category
Number
Concise Written
Description of
Prohousing Policy
Enacted or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution, zoning
code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 5
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total Points
or a Junior ADU
(JADU)s
4M Other actions that
leverage financial
resources for housing
The City consistently
obtains grants for low
income home repairs
and first time
homebuyers.

The City has a
longstanding contract
with the City of Napa to
provide Housing
Assistance and Grant
Administration
Services.

E Interagency
Contract
1 1
TOTAL 28 3 31
57 Appendix 4: Examples of Prohousing Policies with Enhancement Factors If a Prohousing Policy incorporates any of the enhancement factors specified in the Project Proposal Enhancement Factors chart, it will receive extra points as indicated therein.

Examples of such qualifying Prohousing Policies include the following:

Category 1: Favorable Zoning and Land Use
• Rezoning sufficient sites to accommodate 150 percent or greater of the Regional Housing Needs Allocation by total or income category, including sites in Location Efficient Communities.
• Rezoning sufficient sites to accommodate 150 percent or greater of the Regional Housing Needs Allocation by total or income category, including sites in High Resource and Highest Resource areas (as designated in the most recently updated TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps).
• Rezoning to accommodate 125 to 149 percent of the Regional Housing Needs Allocation in downtown commercial corridors or other infill locations. • Expanding density bonus programs to exceed statutory requirements by 10 percent or more in Location Efficient Communities.
• Reducing or eliminating parking requirements for residential development as authorized by Government Code section 65852.2 in Location Efficient Communities. • Increasing allowable density in low-density, single-family residential areas beyond the requirements of state Accessory Dwelling Unit Law in High Resource and Highest Resource areas (as designated in the most recently updated TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps).
• Modification of development standards and other applicable zoning provisions to promote greater development intensity in downtown commercial corridors or other infill locations.
• Coupling rezoning actions with policies that go beyond state law requirements in reducing displacement of lower-income households and conserving existing housing stock that is affordable to lower-income households.

Category 2: Acceleration of Housing Production Timeframes • Ministerial approval processes for multifamily housing in High Resource and Highest Resource areas (as designated in the most recently updated TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps).
• Streamlined, program-level CEQA analysis and certification of specific plans in Location Efficient Communities.
• Documented practice of streamlining housing development at the project level in downtown commercial corridors and other infill locations. • Expedited permit processing for housing affordable to lower-income households in High Resource and Highest Resource areas (as designated in the most recently updated TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps).

Category 3: Reduction of Construction and Development Costs 58 • Fee waivers for affordable housing in High Resource and Highest Resource areas (as designated in the most recently updated TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps). • Fee waivers or reductions for higher density housing in downtown commercial corridors or other infill locations.
• Measures that reduce costs and leverage financial resources for transportation-related infrastructure or programs in Low Resource and High Segregation & Poverty areas (as designated in the most recently updated TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps). • Adoption of universal design ordinances to increase housing choices and affordability for persons with disabilities in High Resource and Highest Resource areas (as designated in the most recently updated TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps). • Permitting innovative housing types, such as manufactured homes, recreational vehicles or park models, in High Resource and Highest Resource areas (as designated in the most recently updated TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps).

Category 4: Providing Financial Subsidies
• Targeting local housing trust funds to acquisition or rehabilitation of existing affordable units, or to affordable units at risk of converting to market rate uses, in Low Resource and High Segregation & Poverty areas (as designated in the most recently updated TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps).
• Marketing grants and other financial products for ADUs/JADUs in High Resource and Highest Resource areas (as designated in the most recently updated TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps).
• Utilizing publicly owned land for affordable housing in High Resource and Highest Resource areas (as designated in the most recently updated TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps).
• Establishment of an Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District or similar local financing tool in a Low Resource or High Segregation & Poverty area (as designated in the most recently updated TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps). • Directing residual redevelopment funds or general funds to conservation or preservation of affordable housing in areas at high risk of displacement. 59 Appendix 5: Additional Information and Supporting Documentation 60 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
MAY 7, 2024

STAFF REPORT

CONSENT
ITEM NUMBER: 13.

TITLE
Watson Ranch Highway 29 Sanitary Sewer Crossing Project

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a Resolu-on of the City of American Canyon authorizing the City Manager to enter into an agreement with RSA+ for the Highway 29 Sanitary Sewer Crossing Project for an amount of $218,000.00.

CONTACT
Erica Ahmann Smithies, P.E. Public Works Director/City Engineer Edison Bisnar, P.E., Senior Civil Engineer

BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS
On October 4, 2018, the Planning Commission approved the 251.78 Acres Large Lot Ves-ng Tenta-ve Map (PC Resolu-on 2018-23) for the development of approximately 309-acre Watson Ranch Specific Plan (WRSP) site with a mixed-use community including a mixed-use town center, 1253 residen-al units, parks, roads and suppor-ng water, wastewater, recycled water and storm drainage infrastructure both on-site and off-site.

The approved the Watson Ranch Public Offsite U-lity Extension Plans include new storm drainage, sanitary sewer, domestic water and recycled water that will connect Watson Ranch to existing public infrastructures. The new offsite utilities are installed within the existing Public Utility Easement.

To date, the improvements associated with the offsite u-li-es are complete, with the excep-on of the Highway 29 sanitary sewer crossing (Attachment 1, Exhibit A).

The Watson Ranch developer (American Canyon I, LLC or AC-1) have requested American Canyon complete Highway 29 sanitary sewer crossing in conjunc-on with one of its ongoing Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Projects; specifically the "SS4 Hwy 29 Sewer Main Replacement".

In response, City staff requested proposals for engineering services. Staff selected RSA+ (Napa, CA) for the design. RSA+ provided a proposal to complete the engineering design, obtain Caltrans Encroachment Permit and construc-on support for the Highway 29 sanitary sewer crossing in the amount of $218,000.00 (Attachment 1, Exhibit B).
61 COUNCIL PRIORITY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS
Infrastructure: "Develop and maintain infrastructure resources to support sustainable growth."

FISCAL IMPACT
AC-1 will reimburse American Canyon for the cost of designing the Highway 29 sanitary sewer crossing. A determination as to who (AC-1 or City) will complete the improvements has not yet been made - although it will likely be the City in conjunc-on with a future reimbursement agreement at time of award of a construction project.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Watson Ranch was presented at a no-ced public hearing held on October 4, 2018. The Planning Commission adopted Resolu-on 2018-19 recommending that the City Council adopt the Mi-ga-on Monitoring and Reporting Program.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution - RSA

2. Exhibit A - Map

3. Exhibit B - Proposal
62 RESOLUTION NO. 2024 - _____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH RSA+ FOR THE HIGHWAY 29 SANITARY SEWER CROSSING PROJECT FOR AN AMOUNT OF $218,000.00
WHEREAS, on October 4, 2018, The Planning Commission approved the 251.78 Acres Large Lot Vesting Tentative Map (PC Resolution 2018-23) for the development of approximately 309-acre Watson Ranch Specific Plan (WRSP) site with a mixed-use community including a mixed-use town center, 1253 residential units, parks, roads and supporting water, wastewater, recycled water and storm drainage infrastructure both on-site and off-site; and
WHEREAS, on May 5, 2021, The City of American Canyon Public Works Department approved the Watson Ranch Offsite Utility Extension Plans. The approved plans show new storm drainage, sanitary sewer, domestic water and recycled water that will connect Watson Ranch to existing public infrastructures. The new offsite utilities are installed within the existing Public Utility Easement; and WHEREAS, on April 22, 2022, the project engineer, submitted a letter certifying the improvements and grading associated with the offsite utility extension project have been constructed in substantial conformance with the approved plans and any subsequent revisions, with the exception of the Highway 29 sanitary sewer crossing. The sanitary sewer crossing was put on hold (Exhibit A); and WHEREAS, on March 28, 2023, the Watson Ranch developer, AC1, requested the City of American Canyon, to include the Watson Ranch Highway 29 sanitary sewer crossing in its Capital Improvement Projects. AC1 will reimburse the City of American Canyon forthe cost of the construction of Highway 29 sanitary sewer crossing project; and
WHEREAS, on January 24, 2024, City staff sent a Request for Proposal to three on-call professional engineering service providers. Staff received two proposals and selected RSA+ for their detailed scope of work and project schedule. RSA+ provided a proposal to complete the engineering design, obtain Caltrans Encroachment Permit and construction support for the Highway 29 sanitary sewer crossing for an amount of $218,000.00 (Exhibit B). Budget for Task 7 of the agreement will be determined when the consultants are identified and proposals are obtained.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of American Canyon hereby authorizes the City Manager to enter into an agreement with RSA+ for the Highway 29 Sanitary Sewer Crossing Project (DV24-0004) for an amount of $218,000.00.

PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council of the City of American Canyon held on the 7th day of May 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
________________________________
Leon Garcia, Mayor
63 ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________ ______________________________ Taresa Geilfuss, CMC, City Clerk William D. Ross, City Attorney Attachments:

Resolution
Exhibit A: Highway 29 Sanitary Sewer Crossing
Exhibit B: RSA+ Proposal
64 65
66 67
68 69
70 71
72 73
74 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
MAY 7, 2024

STAFF REPORT

CONSENT
ITEM NUMBER: 14.

TITLE
Quarterly Investment Report for City and Fire District for Fiscal Year 2023-24 Quarter 3

RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file the City and Fire District’s Treasurer’s Report for the quarter ended March 31, 2024.

CONTACT
Juan Gomez, Finance Director

BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS
The City’s Investment Policy requires; the Treasurer to submit a quarterly investment report to the City Council. The report (A6achment 1) for the quarter ended March 31, 2024, includes investment transac8ons for both the City and Fire District. The report shows the City’s cash and investment book balance, including debt reserves and unspent proceeds, was $79,742,894. The Fire District’s book balance was $5,763,313.

The City’s diversified porBolio includes $31.7 million invested in the California State Treasurer’s Office Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF), $20.6 million invested in the California Asset Management Program and $24.5 million managed by Chandler Asset Management. The funds managed by Chandler are invested in U.S. Treasury Notes, Federal Agency Securities, Asset Backed Securities, U.S. Corporate Notes, Supranational Securities, and FDIC insured Corporate Notes. The lower market value to book value is due to the rising interest rate environment. That is an unrealized number, since the City normally holds investments to maturity. The increasing rate environment also offers an opportunity to invest to achieve higher returns.

The Fire District maintains cash and investment accounts separately from the City. The book value of the District’s total porBolio is $5.76 million. All cash not needed to meet the current opera8onal requirements of the Fire District is invested with Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF).

COUNCIL PRIORITY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS
Organizational Effectiveness: "Deliver exemplary government services." 75 FISCAL IMPACT
The recommended action will have no impact on the city’s budget.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Not Applicable
ATTACHMENTS:

Investment Report March 31, 2024
Chandler Report March 31, 2024
76 Investment Report
For the Quarter Ended
March 31, 2024
ATTACHMENT 1
City of American Canyon
Operating and Capital Funds Book Value Market Value Book Yield (1) % of Portfolio Cash ‐ Petty 2,300 $                   $                  2,300 0.00% Cash ‐ Westamerica Bank 1,588,684                          1,588,684 0.30% 2.03% Local Agency Investment Fund 31,677,287                      31,493,282 4.30% 40.44% California Asset Management Program 20,599,774                      20,599,774 5.48% 26.30% Asset Backed Securities 1,741,651                          1,722,893 5.62% 2.22% Federal Agency Securities 4,020,625                          3,895,732 4.78% 5.13% Collaterial Mortgage Obligations 602,096                                  591,654 5.12% 0.77% Corporate Notes 6,431,502                          6,226,547 5.06% 8.21% Money Market Fund 137,677                                  137,677 4.91% 0.18% Cash ‐ Chandler Asset  Management 31,617                                      31,617 0.00% 0.04% Supranational 1,433,775                          1,403,038 4.78% 1.83% U.S. Treasury Notes 10,061,713                        9,718,532 4.45% 12.85% TOTAL OPERATING CASH           78,328,701           77,411,730 4.68% 100.00% Debt Reserves and Proceeds
Debt Service Reserves
602 ‐ American Canyon Road 726,225                                  726,225 603 ‐ CFD 280,346                                  280,346 Capital Reserve
601 ‐ 2004 Reassessment 362,818                                  362,818 360 ‐ AmCyn Road East 44,804                                      44,804 TOTAL DEBT & CAPITAL RESERVES             1,414,193             1,414,193 TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS ‐ CITY $        79,742,894 $        78,825,923 (1) The weighted average yield as operating and capital funds for the month ended 3/31/2024 was 4.68%. 77 Investment Report
For the Quarter Ended
March 31, 2024
ATTACHMENT 1
American Canyon Fire Protection District
Description Book Value Market Value Book Yield (2) % of Portfolio Cash ‐ Westamerica Bank $              579,378                 579,378 0.30% 10.05% Local Agency Investment Fund             5,183,935             5,153,823 4.30% 89.95% TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS ‐ FIRE DISTRICT $          5,763,313 $          5,733,201 3.90% 100.00% (2) The weighted average yield for the month ended 3/31/2024 was  3.9%.

The investments, as shown above, are in conformance with the Investment Policy or bond agreements There are sufficient funds to meet the City's budgeted financial obligations for the next six months.

Submitted,
Juan Gomez
Finance Director/Treasurer
78 MONTHLY ACCOUNT STATEMENT
City of American Canyon | Account #10130 | As of March 31, 2024 CHANDLER ASSET MANAGEMENT | chandlerasset.com
Information contained herein is confidential. We urge you to compare this statement to the one you receive from your qualified custodian. Please see Important Disclosures at the end of the statement.

Chandler Team:

For questions about your account, please call (800) 317-4747, or contact [email protected]
Custodian:

US Bank
79 CONFIDENTIAL | 2
City of American Canyon | Account #10130 | As of March 31, 2024 Execution Time: 04/11/2024 10:41:21 AM Chandler Asset Management | [email protected] | www.chandlerasset.com | 800.317.4747

PORTFOLIO SUMMARY
Portfolio Characteristics
Sector Allocation
Performance Review
Account Summary
Maturity Distribution
Top Issuers
Credit Quality
Total Rate of Return 1M 3M YTD 1YR 2YRS 3YRS 5YRS 10YRS Since Inception (07/01/10)
City of American Canyon 0.43% 0.22% 0.22% 3.27% 1.57% (0.10%) 1.29% 1.39% 1.42% Benchmark Return* 0.36% (0.01%) (0.01%) 2.45% 1.02% (0.58%) 0.96% 1.12% 1.17% Average Modified Duration 2.47
Average Coupon 2.67%
Average Purchase YTM 2.74%
Average Market YTM 4.78%
Average Quality AA
Average Final Maturity 2.82
Average Life 2.72
Beg. Values as of
03/01/2024
End Values as of
03/31/2024
Market Value 23,610,195.74 23,727,691.12
Accrued Interest 139,263.64 123,661.47
Total Market Value 23,749,459.38 23,851,352.59
Income Earned 51,570.78 24,448.54
Cont/WD 0.00 0.00
Par 24,514,580.46 24,578,497.49
Book Value 24,398,310.25 24,460,656.60
Cost Value 24,433,661.91 24,481,113.63
United States 31.15%
United States Department of The Trea 9.81%
Federal Home Loan Banks 6.41%
FHLMC 5.85%
FNMA 4.41%
Inter-American Development Bank 2.80%
International Bank for Recon and Dev 2.57%
Farm Credit System 2.24%
*Periods over 1 year are annualized.

Benchmark: ICE BofA 1-5 Year Unsubordinated US Treasury & Agency Index Secondary Benchmark:
*See Footnote
The credit quality is a weighted average calculation of the highest of S&P, Moody’s’ and Fitch 80 CONFIDENTIAL | 3
City of American Canyon | Account #10130 | As of March 31, 2024 Execution Time: 04/11/2024 10:41:21 AM Chandler Asset Management | [email protected] | www.chandlerasset.com | 800.317.4747

STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
Rules Name Limit Actual Compliance
Status Notes

AGENCY MORTGAGE SECURITIES (CMOS)
Max % (MV) 100.0 0.0 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 30.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5.0 0.0 Compliant

ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES (ABS)
Max % (MV) 20.0 7.2 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 1.1 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5 4 Compliant
Min Rating (AA- by 1) 0.0 0.0 Compliant

BANKERS' ACCEPTANCES
Max % (MV) 40.0 0.0 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Days) 180 0.0 Compliant
Min Rating (A-1 by 1 or A- by 1) 0.0 0.0 Compliant

CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT PLACEMENT SERVICE (CDARS)
Max % (MV) 30.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5.0 0.0 Compliant

COLLATERALIZED BANK DEPOSITS
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 0.0 Compliant

COLLATERALIZED TIME DEPOSITS (NON-NEGOTIABLE
CD/TD)
Max % (MV) 20.0 0.0 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5.0 0.0 Compliant

COMMERCIAL PAPER
Max % (MV) 25.0 0.0 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Days) 270 0.0 Compliant
Min Rating (A-1 by 1 or A- by 1) 0.0 0.0 Compliant

CORPORATE MEDIUM TERM NOTES
Max % (MV) 30.0 26.3 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 1.7 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5 4 Compliant
Min Rating (A- by 1) 0.0 0.0 Compliant
81 CONFIDENTIAL | 4
City of American Canyon | Account #10130 | As of March 31, 2024 Execution Time: 04/11/2024 10:41:21 AM Chandler Asset Management | [email protected] | www.chandlerasset.com | 800.317.4747

STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
Rules Name Limit Actual Compliance
Status Notes

FDIC INSURED TIME DEPOSITS (NON-NEGOTIABLE CD/
TD)
Max % (MV) 20.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5 0.0 Compliant

FEDERAL AGENCIES
Max % (MV) 100.0 16.4 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 30.0 6.4 Compliant
Max Callables (MV) 20.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5 4 Compliant

LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF)
Max Concentration (MV) 75.0 0.0 Compliant

MONEY MARKET MUTUAL FUNDS
Max % (MV) 20.0 0.6 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 20.0 0.6 Compliant
Min Rating (AAA by 2) 0.0 0.0 Compliant

MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES (NON-AGENCY)
Max % (MV) 20.0 0.0 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5.0 0.0 Compliant
Min Rating (AA- by 1) 0.0 0.0 Compliant

MUNICIPAL SECURITIES (CA, LOCAL AGENCY)
Max % (MV) 30.0 0.0 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5 0.0 Compliant
Min Rating (A- by 1) 0.0 0.0 Compliant

MUNICIPAL SECURITIES (CA, OTHER STATES)
Max % (MV) 30.0 0.0 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5 0.0 Compliant
Min Rating (A- by 1) 0.0 0.0 Compliant

MUTUAL FUNDS
Max % (MV) 20.0 0.0 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 10.0 0.0 Compliant
Min Rating (AAA by 2) 0.0 0.0 Compliant
82 CONFIDENTIAL | 5
City of American Canyon | Account #10130 | As of March 31, 2024 Execution Time: 04/11/2024 10:41:21 AM Chandler Asset Management | [email protected] | www.chandlerasset.com | 800.317.4747

STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
Rules Name Limit Actual Compliance
Status Notes

NEGOTIABLE CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT (NCD)
Max % (MV) 30.0 0.0 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5 0.0 Compliant
Min Rating (A-1 by 1 or A- by 1 if > FDIC Limit) 0.0 0.0 Compliant

REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS
Max Maturity (Years) 1.0 0.0 Compliant

SUPRANATIONAL OBLIGATIONS
Max % (MV) 30.0 5.9 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 10.0 2.8 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5 4 Compliant
Min Rating (AA- by 1) 0.0 0.0 Compliant
U.S. TREASURIES
Max % (MV) 100.0 41.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5 4 Compliant
83 CONFIDENTIAL | 6
City of American Canyon | Account #10130 | As of March 31, 2024 Execution Time: 04/11/2024 10:41:21 AM Chandler Asset Management | [email protected] | www.chandlerasset.com | 800.317.4747

RECONCILIATION SUMMARY
Accrual Activity Summary
Fair Market Activity Summary
Month to Date Fiscal Year to Date
(07/01/2023)
Beginning Book Value 24,398,310.25 24,220,685.94
Maturities/Calls 0.00 (200,000.00)
Principal Paydowns (99,017.57) (878,276.62)
Purchases 411,719.47 8,563,911.63
Sales (273,991.08) (7,113,116.92)
Change in Cash, Payables, Receivables 30,818.33 31,115.61 Amortization/Accretion 1,235.72 1,432.81
Realized Gain (Loss) (8,418.53) (165,095.85)
Ending Book Value 24,460,656.60 24,460,656.60
Month to Date Fiscal Year to Date
(07/01/2023)
Beginning Market Value 23,610,195.74 22,897,468.71
Maturities/Calls 0.00 (200,000.00)
Principal Paydowns (99,017.57) (878,276.62)
Purchases 411,719.47 8,563,911.63
Sales (273,991.08) (7,113,116.92)
Change in Cash, Payables, Receivables 30,818.33 31,115.61 Amortization/Accretion 1,235.72 1,432.81
Change in Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) 55,149.04 590,251.75 Realized Gain (Loss) (8,418.53) (165,095.85)
Ending Market Value 23,727,691.13 23,727,691.13
Maturities / Calls
Month to Date 0.00
Fiscal Year to Date (200,000.00)
Principal Paydowns
Month to Date (99,017.57)
Fiscal Year to Date (878,276.62)
Purchases
Month to Date 411,719.47
Fiscal Year to Date 8,563,911.63
Sales
Month to Date (273,991.08)
Fiscal Year to Date (7,113,116.92)
Interest Received
Month to Date 36,729.07
Fiscal Year to Date 383,173.59
Purchased / Sold Interest
Month to Date 2,085.92
Fiscal Year to Date (9,717.97)
84 CONFIDENTIAL | 7
City of American Canyon | Account #10130 | As of March 31, 2024 Execution Time: 04/11/2024 10:41:21 AM Chandler Asset Management | [email protected] | www.chandlerasset.com | 800.317.4747

HOLDINGS REPORT
Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase Date
Purchase Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
ABS
36265MAC9 GMALT 2022-1 A3 1.9 03/20/2025 22,188.59 02/15/2022

1.91%
22,188.40
22,188.56

99.76 3.51%
22,134.64

12.88 0.09%
(53.92)
Aaa/NA
AAA

0.97 0.07
89240BAC2 TAOT 2021-A A3 0.26 05/15/2025 2,819.63 02/02/2021

0.27%
2,819.11
2,819.54

99.49 4.63%
2,805.26

0.33 0.01%
(14.28)
Aaa/NA
AAA

1.12 0.14
02582JJT8 AMXCA 2022-2 A 05/17/2027 210,000.00 05/17/2022

3.42%
209,953.55
209,974.79

97.93 5.33%
205,661.57
316.40

0.87%
(4,313.22)
NA/AAA
AAA

1.12 1.60
36266FAC3 GMALT 2022-2 A3 3.42 06/20/2025 46,305.55 05/03/2022

3.45%
46,300.72
46,303.86

99.65 5.17%
46,144.51

48.39 0.19%
(159.35)
NA/AAA
AAA

1.22 0.17
47788UAC6 JDOT 2021 A3 0.36 09/15/2025 10,854.11 03/02/2021

0.37%
10,852.03
10,853.56

98.74 5.84%
10,717.77

1.74 0.05%
(135.79)
Aaa/NA
AAA

1.46 0.28
44933LAC7 HART 2021-A A3 0.38 09/15/2025 11,826.43 04/20/2021

0.39%
11,825.18
11,826.13

99.18 5.26%
11,729.51

2.00 0.05%
(96.61)
NA/AAA
AAA

1.46 0.24
44934KAC8 HART 2021-B A3 0.38 01/15/2026 47,626.38 07/20/2021

0.60%
47,615.87
47,623.01

98.47 5.90%
46,896.61

8.04 0.20%
(726.40)
NA/AAA
AAA

1.79 0.46
43815GAC3 HAROT 2021-4 A3 0.88 01/21/2026 43,467.87 11/16/2021

0.89%
43,458.71
43,464.30

97.56 5.98%
42,408.55

10.63 0.18%
(1,055.75)
Aaa/NA
AAA

1.81 0.67
47789QAC4 JDOT 2021-B A3 0.52 03/16/2026 31,356.77 07/13/2021

0.52%
31,353.98
31,355.75

97.64 5.58%
30,618.25

7.25 0.13%
(737.49)
Aaa/NA
AAA

1.96 0.53
44935FAD6 HART 2021-C A3 0.74 05/15/2026 29,270.92 11/09/2021

0.75%
29,264.38
29,268.26

97.77 6.00%
28,617.93

9.63 0.12%
(650.34)
NA/AAA
AAA

2.12 0.66
43815BAC4 HAROT 2022-1 A3 1.88 05/15/2026 99,196.18 02/15/2022

1.89%
99,181.26
99,189.28

97.68 6.04%
96,890.84

82.88 0.41%
(2,298.44)
Aaa/AAA
NA

2.12 0.81
05602RAD3 BMWOT 2022-A A3 3.21
08/25/2026 63,540.42 05/10/20223.63%
63,537.12
63,538.94

98.48 5.71%
62,577.08

33.99 0.26%
(961.86)
Aaa/AAA
NA

2.40 0.93
47787JAC2 JDOT 2022 A3 0.36 09/15/2026 65,963.22 03/10/2022

2.34%
65,948.63
65,955.75

97.90 5.74%
64,578.17

68.02 0.27%
(1,377.58)
Aaa/NA
AAA

2.46 0.77
89238FAD5 TAOT 2022-B A3 2.93 09/15/2026 73,699.63 04/07/2022

3.09%
73,697.90
73,698.88

98.34 5.93%
72,472.92

95.97 0.31%
(1,225.96)
Aaa/AAA
NA

2.46 0.95
362554AC1 GMCAR 2021-4 A3 0.68 09/16/2026 35,052.80 10/13/2021

0.68%
35,051.90
35,052.51

97.10 6.58%
34,037.49

9.93 0.14%
(1,015.01)
Aaa/AAA
NA

2.46 0.85
448977AD0 HART 2022-A A3 2.22 10/15/2026 56,064.57 03/09/2022

2.23%
56,062.41
56,063.67

97.85 6.00%
54,859.41

55.32 0.23%
(1,204.26)
NA/AAA
AAA

2.54 0.91
380146AC4 GMCAR 2022-1 A3 1.23 11/16/2026 34,331.12 01/11/2022

1.24%
34,328.14
34,329.96

97.54 6.28%
33,487.14

18.02 0.14%
(842.82)
NA/AAA
AAA

2.63 0.90
85 CONFIDENTIAL | 8
City of American Canyon | Account #10130 | As of March 31, 2024 Execution Time: 04/11/2024 10:41:21 AM Chandler Asset Management | [email protected] | www.chandlerasset.com | 800.317.4747

HOLDINGS REPORT
Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase Date
Purchase Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
362585AC5 GMCAR 2022-2 A3 3.1 02/16/2027 68,266.96 04/05/2022

3.13%
68,252.70
68,259.10

98.21 5.87%
67,043.55

88.18 0.28%
(1,215.55)
Aaa/AAA
NA

2.88 1.12
47800AAC4 JDOT 2022-B A3 3.74 02/16/2027 100,000.00 07/12/2022

3.77%
99,990.45
99,994.76

98.54 5.73%
98,535.82
166.22

0.42%
(1,458.94)
Aaa/NA
AAA

2.88 1.04
47800BAC2 JDOT 2022-C A3 5.09 06/15/2027 160,000.00 10/12/2022

3.29%
159,987.58
159,991.93

99.65 5.67%
159,435.71
361.96

0.67%
(556.22)
Aaa/NA
AAA

3.21 1.33
58768PAC8 MBART 2022-1 A3 5.21 08/16/2027 230,000.00 11/15/2022

5.27%
229,954.51
229,968.59

99.89 5.58%
229,756.13
532.58

0.97%
(212.46)
Aaa/AAA
NA

3.38 1.59
05592XAD2 BMWOT 2023-A A3 5.47
02/25/2028 45,000.00 07/11/20235.47%
44,992.03
44,993.25
100.41

5.49%
45,184.59

41.02 0.19%
191.33
NA/AAA
AAA

3.91 2.26
161571HT4 CHAIT 2023-1 A 5.16 09/15/2028 255,000.00 09/07/2023

5.17%
254,929.31
254,937.01
100.51

5.33%
256,299.71
584.80

1.08%
1,362.70
NR/AAA
AAA

4.46 2.26
Total ABS 1,741,831.15 3.41%
1,741,545.87
1,741,651.36

98.92 5.62%
1,722,893.16
2,556.17

7.26%
(18,758.20)
Aaa/AAA
AAA

2.74 1.29
AGENCY
3137EAEP0 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE
CORP 1.5 02/12/2025 365,000.00 02/13/20201.52%
364,718.95
364,951.18

96.91 5.20%
353,724.31
745.21

1.49%
(11,226.88)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

0.87 0.84
3130A4CH3 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 2.375
03/14/2025 300,000.00 03/19/20201.20%
317,331.00
303,304.32

97.51 5.09%
292,526.00
336.46

1.23%
(10,778.32)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

0.95 0.93
3130AJHU6 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 0.5
04/14/2025 210,000.00 06/04/20200.53%
209,721.12
209,940.58

95.33 5.19%
200,189.02
487.08

0.84%
(9,751.55)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

1.04 1.01
3135G03U5 FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE
ASSOCIATION 0.625 04/22/2025 145,000.00 04/22/20200.67% 144,701.30
144,936.79

95.48 5.06%
138,447.66
400.26

0.58%
(6,489.12)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

1.06 1.03
3135G04Z3 FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE
ASSOCIATION 0.5 06/17/2025 360,000.00 06/17/20200.54%
359,254.80
359,819.42

94.84 4.95%
341,406.14
520.00

1.44%
(18,413.28)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

1.21 1.18
3137EAEU9 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE
CORP 0.375 07/21/2025 190,000.00 07/21/20200.48%
189,053.80
189,753.08

94.34 4.90%
179,243.30
138.54

0.76%
(10,509.78)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

1.31 1.27
3135G05X7 FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE
ASSOCIATION 0.375 08/25/2025 305,000.00 08/25/20200.47% 303,572.60
304,600.11

93.93 4.91%
286,495.65
114.38

1.21%
(18,104.46)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

1.40 1.37
3137EAEX3 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE
CORP 0.375 09/23/2025 280,000.00 09/23/20200.44%
279,157.20
279,750.49

93.67 4.87%
262,275.67

23.33 1.11%
(17,474.82)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

1.48 1.44
3135G06G3 FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE
ASSOCIATION 0.5 11/07/2025 300,000.00 11/09/20200.57%
298,926.00
299,654.97

93.47 4.79%
280,418.52
600.00

1.18%
(19,236.45)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

1.61 1.56
3130ATUC9 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 4.5
12/12/2025 450,000.00 02/08/20234.21%
453,393.00
452,028.60

99.50 4.81%
447,732.40
6,131.25

1.89%
(4,296.21)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

1.70 1.60
86 CONFIDENTIAL | 9
City of American Canyon | Account #10130 | As of March 31, 2024 Execution Time: 04/11/2024 10:41:21 AM Chandler Asset Management | [email protected] | www.chandlerasset.com | 800.317.4747

HOLDINGS REPORT
Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase Date
Purchase Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
3130AWMN7 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 4.375
06/09/2028 300,000.00 07/26/20234.27%
301,350.00
301,161.05
100.07

4.35%
300,214.00
4,083.33

1.27%
(947.05)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

4.19 3.75
3130AWTR1 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 4.375
09/08/2028 280,000.00 09/12/20234.51%
278,350.80
278,532.74
100.42

4.27%
281,164.81
782.64

1.18%
2,632.08
Aaa/AA+
AA+

4.44 3.99
3133EPWK7 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS
FUNDING CORP 4.5 09/22/2028 280,000.00 09/22/20234.66%
278,023.20
278,228.03
100.80

4.30%
282,234.81
315.00

1.19%
4,006.78
Aaa/AA+
AA+

4.48 4.02
3133EPN50 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS
FUNDING CORP 4.25 12/15/2028 250,000.00 12/28/20233.88% 254,180.00
253,963.28

99.86 4.28%
249,659.88
3,128.47

1.05%
(4,303.39)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

4.71 4.18
Total Agency 4,015,000.00 2.18%
4,031,733.77
4,020,624.63

97.10 4.78%
3,895,732.18
17,805.95

16.42%
(124,892.45)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

2.19 2.03

AGENCY CMBS
3137BFE98 FHMS K-041 A2 3.171 10/25/2024 147,372.04 07/01/2021

0.66%
158,528.57
149,099.32

98.68 5.34%
145,420.22
389.43

0.61%
(3,679.10)
Aaa/AA+
AAA

0.57 0.49
3137FG6X8 FHMS K-077 A2 3.85 05/25/2028 460,000.00 05/24/2023

4.24%
451,554.69
452,996.69

97.01 5.05%
446,234.18
1,475.83

1.88%
(6,762.51)
Aaa/AA+
AAA

4.15 3.67
Total Agency
CMBS 607,372.04 3.36%
610,083.26
602,096.01

97.42 5.12%
591,654.39
1,865.26

2.49%
(10,441.61)
Aaa/AA+
AAA

3.27 2.89
CASH
CCYUSD Receivable 31,617.21 --

0.00%
31,617.21
31,617.21

1.00 0.00%
31,617.21

0.00 0.13%

0.00 Aaa/AAA
AAA

0.00 0.00
Total Cash 31,617.21 0.00%
31,617.21
31,617.21

1.00 0.00%
31,617.21

0.00 0.13%

0.00 Aaa/AAA
AAA

0.00 0.00

CORPORATE
00440EAS6 CHUBB INA HOLDINGS INC 3.15
03/15/2025 200,000.00 02/24/20210.85%
218,428.00
204,338.93

97.92 5.41%
195,836.75
280.00

0.83%
(8,502.18)
A3/A
A

0.96 0.93
06367WB85 BANK OF MONTREAL 1.85
05/01/2025 205,000.00 03/24/20211.16%
210,750.25
206,517.27

96.30 5.41%
197,417.72
1,580.21

0.83%
(9,099.55)
A2/AAA1.08

1.05 037833DT4 APPLE INC 1.125 05/11/2025 155,000.00 09/16/2021

0.82%
156,643.00
155,480.34

95.75 5.11%
148,410.40
678.12

0.63%
(7,069.93)
Aaa/AA+
NA

1.11 1.08
14913R2V8 CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES
CORP 3.4 05/13/2025 110,000.00 05/10/20223.44%
109,860.30
109,948.12

98.08 5.19%
107,886.69
1,433.67

0.45%
(2,061.43)
A2/A
A+

1.12 1.07
747525AF0 QUALCOMM INC 3.45 05/20/2025 350,000.00 --

0.85%
385,138.10
357,988.80

98.13 5.16%
343,472.08
4,393.96

1.45%
(14,516.72)
A2/A
NA

1.14 1.09
87 CONFIDENTIAL | 10
City of American Canyon | Account #10130 | As of March 31, 2024 Execution Time: 04/11/2024 10:41:21 AM Chandler Asset Management | [email protected] | www.chandlerasset.com | 800.317.4747

HOLDINGS REPORT
Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase Date
Purchase Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
61747YEA9 MORGAN STANLEY 0.79 05/30/2025 300,000.00 --

0.80%
299,941.80
299,995.00

99.07 6.40%
297,218.70
796.58

1.25%
(2,776.30)
A1/AA+1.16

0.17 78015K7H1 ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 1.15
06/10/2025 350,000.00 --1.19%
349,710.00
349,837.11

95.39 5.19%
333,859.74
1,241.04

1.41%
(15,977.37)
A1/A
AA1.191.16
63743HFE7

NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES
COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORP 3.45
06/15/2025
170,000.00 --

3.55%
169,501.10
169,806.94

97.87 5.29%
166,382.22
1,726.92

0.70%
(3,424.72)
A2/AA1.21

1.15 857477BR3 STATE STREET CORP 1.746
02/06/2026 80,000.00 02/02/20221.75%
80,000.00
80,000.00

96.66 5.84%
77,326.28
213.40

0.33%
(2,673.72)
A1/A
AA1.850.82
46647PBK1 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 2.083
04/22/2026 200,000.00 09/16/20211.07%
206,378.00
202,106.94

96.36 5.68%
192,712.45
1,839.98

0.81%
(9,394.49)
A1/AAA2.06

1.02 91324PEC2 UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 1.15
05/15/2026 350,000.00 --1.43%
345,778.05
347,966.12

92.49 4.92%
323,732.09
1,520.56

1.36%
(24,234.03)
A2/A+
A

2.12 2.05
89236TJK2 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP 1.125
06/18/2026 350,000.00 --1.15%
349,529.80
349,782.55

92.04 4.96%
322,149.76
1,126.56

1.36%
(27,632.78)
A1/A+
A+

2.22 2.14
06051GJD2 BANK OF AMERICA CORP 1.319
06/19/2026 200,000.00 09/16/20211.22%
200,670.00
200,241.27

95.06 5.58%
190,112.12
747.43

0.80%
(10,129.15)
A1/AAA2.22

1.18 06368FAC3 BANK OF MONTREAL 1.25
09/15/2026 100,000.00 09/23/20211.39%
99,311.00
99,659.30

91.23 5.10%
91,227.05

55.56 0.38%
(8,432.25)
A2/AAA2.46

2.37 931142ER0 WALMART INC 1.05 09/17/2026 40,000.00 09/08/2021

1.09%
39,924.40
39,962.78

91.68 4.67%
36,670.06

16.33 0.15%
(3,292.72)
Aa2/AA
AA

2.47 2.38
89114TZN5 TORONTO-DOMINION BANK 1.95
01/12/2027 300,000.00 01/25/20222.11%
297,689.85
298,703.97

92.44 4.89%
277,311.08
1,283.75

1.17%
(21,392.89)
A1/A
AA2.792.64
87612EBM7 TARGET CORP 1.95 01/15/2027 135,000.00 01/19/2022

1.99%
134,770.50
134,871.30

92.95 4.67%
125,486.26
555.75

0.53%
(9,385.04)
A2/A
A

2.79 2.65
808513BY0 CHARLES SCHWAB CORP 2.45
03/03/2027 75,000.00 03/01/20222.47%
74,919.00
74,952.72

93.19 4.98%
69,891.62
142.92

0.29%
(5,061.09)
A2/AA2.92

2.76 084664CZ2 BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY FINANCE
CORP 2.3 03/15/2027 220,000.00 03/07/20222.30%
219,958.20
219,975.32

94.16 4.43%
207,162.88
224.89

0.87%
(12,812.44)
Aa2/AA
A+

2.96 2.81
023135CF1 AMAZON.COM INC 3.3 04/13/2027 150,000.00 04/25/2022

3.34%
149,740.50
149,841.46

96.18 4.66%
144,275.14
2,310.00

0.61%
(5,566.32)
A1/AA
AA3.042.80
74340XBN0 PROLOGIS LP 2.125 04/15/2027 325,000.00 11/09/2022

5.15%
286,419.25
298,474.24

92.08 4.96%
299,270.68
3,184.55

1.26%
796.44
A3/A
WR

3.04 2.86
927804GH1 VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER CO

3.75 05/15/2027 65,000.00 05/16/20223.82%
64,797.20
64,872.38

96.47 4.98%
62,703.14
920.83

0.26%
(2,169.24)
A2/BBB+
A

3.12 2.86
88 CONFIDENTIAL | 11
City of American Canyon | Account #10130 | As of March 31, 2024 Execution Time: 04/11/2024 10:41:21 AM Chandler Asset Management | [email protected] | www.chandlerasset.com | 800.317.4747

HOLDINGS REPORT
Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase Date
Purchase Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
14913R3A3 CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES
CORP 3.6 08/12/2027 180,000.00 08/22/20223.81%
178,277.40
178,833.87

96.37 4.78%
173,469.47
882.00

0.73%
(5,364.40)
A2/A
A+

3.37 3.11
931142EX7 WALMART INC 3.95 09/09/2027 140,000.00 --

3.98%
139,833.40
139,886.07

98.25 4.50%
137,551.00
337.94

0.58%
(2,335.07)
Aa2/AA
AA

3.44 3.17
06051GGF0 BANK OF AMERICA CORP 3.824
01/20/2028 200,000.00 04/10/20235.10%
191,298.00
193,538.18

96.32 5.25%
192,631.04
1,508.36

0.81%
(907.14)
A1/AAA3.81

2.60 79466LAF1 SALESFORCE INC 3.7 04/11/2028 250,000.00 08/23/2023

4.84%
238,280.00
239,804.78

97.02 4.52%
242,552.65
4,368.06

1.02%
2,747.87
A1/A+
NA

4.03 3.63
74456QBU9 PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS
CO 3.7 05/01/2028 250,000.00 09/06/20235.10%
235,697.50
237,433.69

96.02 4.78%
240,047.69
3,854.17

1.01%
2,614.00
A1/A
WR

4.08 3.68
037833ET3 APPLE INC 4.0 05/10/2028 50,000.00 05/08/2023

4.04%
49,903.50
49,920.77

98.42 4.42%
49,211.88
783.33

0.21%
(708.90)
Aaa/AA+
NA

4.11 3.69
02665WEM9 AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORP

5.125 07/07/2028 200,000.00 08/17/20235.33%
198,238.00
198,459.49
101.13

4.83%
202,258.91
2,391.67

0.85%
3,799.43
A3/AA4.27

3.76 46647PDG8 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 4.851
07/25/2028 200,000.00 08/04/20235.27%
197,018.00
197,506.41

99.16 5.13%
198,313.40
1,778.70

0.84%
806.99
A1/AAA4.32

3.01 69371RS80 PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP 4.6
01/31/2029 305,000.00 01/24/20244.64%
304,502.85
304,519.45

99.33 4.75%
302,966.52
2,377.31

1.28%
(1,552.93)
A1/A+
NA

4.84 4.26
17275RBR2 CISCO SYSTEMS INC 4.85
02/26/2029 275,000.00 03/14/20244.74%
276,287.00
276,276.85
100.74

4.68%
277,029.90
1,296.70

1.17%
753.05
A1/AANA4.91

4.30 Total Corporate 6,480,000.00 2.79%
6,459,193.95
6,431,502.42

96.17 5.06%
6,226,547.38
45,851.24

26.24%
(204,955.04)
A1/A
A+

2.68 2.30

MONEY MARKET
FUND
31846V203 FIRST AMER:GVT OBLG Y 137,677.09 --

4.91%
137,677.09
137,677.09

1.00 4.91%
137,677.09

0.00 0.58%

0.00 Aaa/
AAAm
AAA

0.00 0.00
Total Money
Market Fund 137,677.09 4.91%
137,677.09
137,677.09

1.00 4.91%
137,677.09

0.00 0.58%

0.00 Aaa/
AAAm
AAA

0.00 0.00

SUPRANATIONAL
4581X0DZ8 INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT
BANK 0.5 09/23/2024 375,000.00 09/15/20210.52%
374,722.50
374,955.69

97.71 5.42%
366,402.88

41.67 1.54%
(8,552.81)
Aaa/AAA
NA

0.48 0.47
89 CONFIDENTIAL | 12
City of American Canyon | Account #10130 | As of March 31, 2024 Execution Time: 04/11/2024 10:41:21 AM Chandler Asset Management | [email protected] | www.chandlerasset.com | 800.317.4747

HOLDINGS REPORT
Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase Date
Purchase Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
459058JB0

INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR

RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPM

0.625 04/22/2025
180,000.00 04/15/2020

0.70%
179,303.40
179,852.75

95.58 4.96%
172,043.92
497.67

0.73%
(7,808.82)
Aaa/AAA
NA

1.06 1.03
459058JL8

INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR

RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPM

0.5 10/28/2025
250,000.00 10/21/2020

0.52%
249,717.50
249,911.04

93.53 4.81%
233,833.51
531.25

0.99%
(16,077.53)
Aaa/AAA
NA

1.58 1.53
459058KT9

INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR

RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPM

3.5 07/12/2028
210,000.00 11/28/2023

4.55%
200,928.00
201,589.84

96.64 4.37%
202,936.07
1,612.92

0.86%
1,346.23
Aaa/AAA
NA

4.28 3.89
45950KDD9 INTERNATIONAL FINANCE CORP 4.5
07/13/2028 130,000.00 07/06/20234.53%
129,855.70
129,876.47
100.54

4.36%
130,700.25
1,267.50

0.55%
823.77
Aaa/AAA
NA

4.28 3.83
4581X0EN4 INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT
BANK 4.125 02/15/2029 300,000.00 02/15/20244.31%
297,534.00
297,589.49

99.04 4.34%
297,120.87
2,096.88

1.25%
(468.62)
Aaa/AAA
NA

4.88 4.34
Total
Supranational 1,445,000.00 2.30%
1,432,061.10
1,433,775.28

97.14 4.78%
1,403,037.49
6,047.88

5.91%
(30,737.78)
Aaa/AAA
NA

2.57 2.34

US TREASURY
912828ZC7 UNITED STATES TREASURY 1.125
02/28/2025 500,000.00 --0.64%
508,781.26
502,172.24

96.49 5.09%
482,465.82
489.13

2.03%
(19,706.42)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

0.91 0.89
91282CAZ4 UNITED STATES TREASURY 0.375
11/30/2025 275,000.00 12/28/20200.38%
274,924.80
274,974.55

93.04 4.77%
255,846.68
346.57

1.08%
(19,127.88)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

1.67 1.63
91282CBC4 UNITED STATES TREASURY 0.375
12/31/2025 650,000.00 --0.71%
640,784.38
646,231.40

92.75 4.74%
602,875.00
616.07

2.54%
(43,356.40)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

1.75 1.71
91282CBT7 UNITED STATES TREASURY 0.75
03/31/2026 650,000.00 --0.90%
645,357.42
648,102.00

92.66 4.64%
602,265.62

13.32 2.54%
(45,836.37)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

2.00 1.94
91282CCP4 UNITED STATES TREASURY 0.625
07/31/2026 350,000.00 --1.04%
343,220.70
346,698.64

91.39 4.55%
319,867.19
366.59

1.35%
(26,831.45)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

2.33 2.27
91282CCW9 UNITED STATES TREASURY 0.75
08/31/2026 650,000.00 --0.88%
645,862.26
647,975.24

91.41 4.54%
594,166.01
423.91

2.50%
(53,809.23)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

2.42 2.35
91282CDG3 UNITED STATES TREASURY 1.125
10/31/2026 700,000.00 --1.28%
694,789.06
697,262.27

91.84 4.51%
642,906.25
3,310.10

2.71%
(54,356.02)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

2.59 2.49
91282CEF4 UNITED STATES TREASURY 2.5
03/31/2027 350,000.00 09/27/20224.25%
325,035.16
333,397.24

94.68 4.41%
331,378.91

23.91 1.40%
(2,018.34)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

3.00 2.81
91282CEN7 UNITED STATES TREASURY 2.75
04/30/2027 400,000.00 06/13/20223.43%
387,734.38
392,259.09

95.23 4.42%
380,906.25
4,623.63

1.61%
(11,352.84)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

3.08 2.88
90 CONFIDENTIAL | 13
City of American Canyon | Account #10130 | As of March 31, 2024 Execution Time: 04/11/2024 10:41:21 AM Chandler Asset Management | [email protected] | www.chandlerasset.com | 800.317.4747

HOLDINGS REPORT
Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase Date
Purchase Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
91282CEW7 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.25
06/30/2027 700,000.00 --2.97%
708,996.10
705,919.48

96.57 4.44%
675,992.18
5,750.00

2.85%
(29,927.30)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

3.25 3.02
91282CFH9 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.125
08/31/2027 250,000.00 09/08/20223.36%
247,275.39
248,130.11

96.06 4.38%
240,156.25
679.35

1.01%
(7,973.86)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

3.42 3.19
91282CFM8 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.125
09/30/2027 280,000.00 12/20/20223.84%
283,401.56
282,490.71

99.22 4.37%
277,823.44

31.56 1.17%
(4,667.27)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

3.50 3.16
91282CFU0 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.125
10/31/2027 280,000.00 01/09/20233.67%
285,490.63
284,092.16

99.21 4.37%
277,779.69
4,854.81

1.17%
(6,312.48)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

3.59 3.24
91282CGC9 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.875
12/31/2027 280,000.00 01/26/20233.62%
283,215.63
282,447.02

98.39 4.34%
275,482.81
2,742.31

1.16%
(6,964.21)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

3.75 3.42
9128283W8 UNITED STATES TREASURY 2.75
02/15/2028 300,000.00 03/08/20234.37%
278,660.16
283,261.71

94.40 4.33%
283,195.31
1,042.58

1.19%
(66.40)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

3.88 3.61
91282CGT2 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.625
03/31/2028 450,000.00 --3.63%
449,876.96
449,900.45

97.48 4.32%
438,679.69

44.57 1.85%
(11,220.76)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

4.00 3.61
91282CHA2 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.5
04/30/2028 575,000.00 --3.61%
572,176.76
572,668.60

97.00 4.31%
557,772.46
8,459.13

2.35%
(14,896.14)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

4.08 3.70
91282CHE4 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.625
05/31/2028 250,000.00 06/15/20233.95%
246,347.66
246,932.52

97.46 4.29%
243,662.11
3,045.59

1.03%
(3,270.41)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

4.17 3.78
91282CHQ7 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.125
07/31/2028 430,000.00 --4.64%
420,509.38
421,512.02

99.38 4.28%
427,312.50
2,972.49

1.80%
5,800.48
Aaa/AA+
AA+

4.33 3.91
91282CHX2 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.375
08/31/2028 450,000.00 --4.53%
446,964.85
447,283.66
100.41

4.27%
451,845.70
1,711.96

1.90%
4,562.04
Aaa/AA+
AA+

4.42 3.97
91282CJA0 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.625
09/30/2028 450,000.00 10/19/20234.97%
443,285.16
443,894.59
101.44

4.27%
456,486.33

56.86 1.92%
12,591.74
Aaa/AA+
AA+

4.50 3.95
91282CJN2 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.375
11/30/2028 350,000.00 12/21/20233.82%
358,599.61
358,118.41
100.53

4.25%
351,845.70
5,146.00

1.48%
(6,272.71)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

4.67 4.13
91282CJW2 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.0
01/31/2029 250,000.00 02/26/20244.31%
246,533.20
246,598.68

98.97 4.24%
247,421.88
1,675.82

1.04%
823.19
Aaa/AA+
AA+

4.84 4.33
91282CKD2 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.25
02/28/2029 300,000.00 02/27/20244.30%
299,378.91
299,389.79
100.13

4.22%
300,398.44
1,108.70

1.27%
1,008.64
Aaa/AA+
AA+

4.91 4.38
Total US Treasury 10,120,000.00 2.83%
10,037,201.38
10,061,712.61

96.14 4.45%
9,718,532.22
49,534.96

40.96%
(343,180.39)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

3.24 2.99
Total Portfolio 24,578,497.49 2.74%
24,481,113.63
24,460,656.60

95.92 4.78%
23,727,691.12
123,661.47
100.00%
(732,965.47)
Aa2/AAAA2.82

2.47 91
CONFIDENTIAL | 14
City of American Canyon | Account #10130 | As of March 31, 2024 Execution Time: 04/11/2024 10:41:21 AM Chandler Asset Management | [email protected] | www.chandlerasset.com | 800.317.4747

HOLDINGS REPORT
Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase Date
Purchase Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
Total Market
Value + Accrued 23,851,352.59
92 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
MAY 7, 2024

STAFF REPORT

BUSINESS
ITEM NUMBER: 15.

TITLE
Contract Award for Benton Way Pavement Rehabilitation Project (TR22-0400)

RECOMMENDATION
Take the following actions related to Benton Way Pavement Rehabilitation Project:

1. Adopt a Resolu7on amending the FY 2023-24 Capital Budget and increasing the Project Budget;

2. Awarding a construc7on contract to Ghilo: Construc7on Company in the amount of $1,344,985.50; and

3. Authorizing the Public Works Director to approve and execute Contract Change Orders in an aggregate amount not to exceed the Project Budget in conjunc7on with the Benton Way Pavement Rehabilitation Project (TR22-0400).

CONTACT
Erica Ahmann Smithies, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer Ron Ranada, P.E., Senior Civil Engineer

BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS
The Benton Way Pavement Rehabilitation Project (TR22-0400) consists of pavement rehabilitation of Benton Way from Wetlands Edge Road to EllioB Drive (approximately 2,000 linear feet of roadway).

Work includes, but is not limited to, mobiliza7on, storm water pollu7on preven7on, traffic control, curb ramp upgrades and curb extensions for pedestrian safety, road rehabilita7on including base reconstruc7on (using full depth reclama7on) and new asphalt concrete paving, and new signage and striping.

The City solicited compe77ve bids for the Project on April 4, 2024. The Engineer’s Es7mate was $1,289,000. On April 25, 2024, the following bids were received and publicly read aloud:

Bidder Total Bid Amount
Ghilotti Construction Company $1,344,985.50
Ghilotti Bros. Inc.
$1,347,641.50
Argonaut Constructors $1,434,471.50
Martin Brothers Construction $1,683,650.00
93 The bid submiBed by Ghilo: Construc7on Company in the amount of $1,344,985.50 was the apparent low bid. Staff has reviewed the bid from Ghilotti Construction Company and found it to be both responsive and responsible. Staff has verified the contractor's qualifica7ons including valid Class A license, DIR registra7on, and references, and found them to be sa7sfactory and acceptable.

The prices of the Bid Items reflect reasonable and customary costs of comple7ng the work. Staff recommends the Council award a construc7on contract to Ghilo: Construc7on Company in the amount of $1,344,985.50 in conjunc7on with the Benton Way Pavement Rehabilita7on Project (TR22-0400).

COUNCIL PRIORITY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS
Infrastructure: "Develop and maintain infrastructure resources to support sustainable growth."

FISCAL IMPACT
The FY 2023-24 Capital Budget currently provides for a Project Budget for the Benton Way Pavement Rehabilitation Project (TR22-0400) in the amount of $1,434,520.

Upon evalua7on of the Walk Audit Report by the Napa County Safe Routes to School Program, staff adopted several of the recommenda7ons and increased the scope of work to install curb extensions along Benton Way. The preliminary Engineer’s Es7mate was also updated to reflect increased construc7on unit costs. Addi7onal funds are available in Measure T, Fund 213 for the addi7onal scope of work and increased costs.

ALer staff further analyzed exis7ng condi7ons impacted by the road work, it was also determined that addi7onal work is required involving the water and wastewater systems. Therefore, staff recommends bringing in funds from Fund 510 (Water Ops fund) and Fund 540 (Wastewater Ops fund), and amending the Project Budget as follows:

Source Current Amount New Amount
Fund 211, Measure T $558,600 $834,000
Fund 213, RMRA $800,000 $800,000
Fund 240, ARPA $75,920 $76,000
Fund 510, Water Ops Fund $0 $127,000
Fund 540, Wastewater Ops
Fund
$0 $33,000
Total $1,434,520 $1,870,000

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Benton Way Pavement Rehabilita7on Project (TR22-0400) is Categorically Exempt from CEQA 94 per CEQA Guidelines Sec7ons 15301(c) (Exis7ng Facili7es) and 15302 (Replacement or Reconstruction).

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution - Benton Way Pavement Rehabilitation Project 95 RESOLUTION NO. 2024-______
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON 1) AMENDING THE FY2023- 24 CAPITAL BUDGET AND INCREASING THE PROJECT BUDGET, 2) AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO GHILOTTI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,344,985.50, AND 3)

AUTHORIZING THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TO APPROVE AND EXECUTE CONTRACT CHANGE

ORDERS IN AN AGGREGATE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED THE PROJECT BUDGET IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE BENTON WAY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT (TR22-0400) WHEREAS, the Benton Way Pavement Rehabilitation Project (TR22-0400) consists of pavement rehabilitation of approximately 2,000 linear feet of roadway by means of full depth reclamation via cement treatment (FDR-C) at Benton Way from Wetlands Edge Road to Elliott Drive; and WHEREAS, the original scope of work was increased to accommodate recommendations from the Walk Audit Report provided by the Napa County Safe Routes to School Program; and WHEREAS, staff determined there will be associated work required on the Water and Wastewater facilities in the project area; and
WHEREAS, the Engineer’s Estimate for the Project is $1,289,000; and WHEREAS, the City solicited competitive bids for the Project on April 4, 2024, and on April 25, 2024, the following bids were received and publicly read aloud; and Bidder Total Bid Amount
Ghilotti Construction Company $1,344,985.50
Ghilotti Bros. Inc. $1,347,641.50
Argonaut Constructors $1,434,471.50
Martin Brothers Construction $1,683,650.00
WHEREAS, staff has reviewed the bid from Ghilotti Construction Company and found it to be both responsive and responsible; and
WHEREAS, staff has verified the contractor’s qualifications and references, and found them to be satisfactory and acceptable; and
WHEREAS, staff finds the prices of the Bid Items reflect reasonable and customary costs of completing the work.
96 2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of American Canyon, hereby amends the FY 2023-24 Capital Budget, and increases the Project Budget as follows; and Source Current Amount New Amount
Fund 211, Measure T $558,600 $834,000
Fund 213, RMRA $800,000 $800,000
Fund 240, ARPA $75,920 $76,000
Fund 510, Water Ops Fund $0 $127,000
Fund 540, Wastewater Ops Fund $0 $33,000
Total $1,434,520 $1,870,000
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of American Canyon hereby 1) awards a construction contract to Ghilotti Construction Company in the amount of $1,344,985.50 and 2) authorizes the Public Works Director to approve and execute change orders in an aggregate amount not to exceed the Project Budget in conjunction with the Benton Way Pavement Rehabilitation Project (TR22-0400).

PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council of the City of American Canyon held on the 7th day of May, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
____________________________
Leon Garcia, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVE AS TO FORM:
____________________________ _____________________________ Taresa Geilfuss, CMC, City Clerk William D. Ross, City Attorney 97 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
MAY 7, 2024

STAFF REPORT

BUSINESS
ITEM NUMBER: 16.

TITLE
Engineer's Report for Citywide LLAD Fiscal Year 2024/25

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a Resolu-on ini-a-ng proceedings, preliminarily approving the Fiscal Year 2024/25 Annual Engineer’s Report, declaring the inten-on to levy and collect annual assessments, and se2ng the Public Hearing for considera-on of the American Canyon Landscaping and Ligh-ng Assessment District assessments for FY2024/25 for May 21, 2024, at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers.

CONTACT
Erica Ahmann Smithies, P.E., Public Works Director

BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS
This item for Council’s considera-on regarding the American Canyon Landscaping and Ligh-ng Assessment District (LLAD). Harris & Associates is the Assessment Engineer for the American Canyon LLAD. In that role, they have prepared the FY2024/25 Annual Engineer’s Report.

The annual filing of an Engineer’s Report is required by the Landscaping & Ligh-ng Act of 1972.

Proposed adjustments to the annual assessments are described below. The complete FY2024/25 Engineer’s Report is shown in ACachment 1, Exhibit A. In addi-on to the report, City staff mailed no-ces to all residents in Zones 1 and 2 regarding two informa-onal in-person park pop-ups held in April 2024.

Staff is reques-ng City Council to ini-ate proceedings, preliminarily approve the FY2024/25 Annual Engineer’s Report, declare the inten-on to levy and collect assessments, and set the Public Hearing for considera-on of the American Canyon Landscaping and Ligh-ng Assessment District assessments for FY2024/25 for May 21, 2024, at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers.

The American Canyon LLAD is divided into three (3) zones:

Zone 1: In January 2001, the City Council approved the forma-on of the LLAD. At the -me, the purpose of the LLAD was to operate and maintain facilities constructed within the La Vigne subdivision. This area of the LLAD is known as Zone 1. The annual work associated with maintaining the facili-es within Zone 1 includes opera-on and maintenance of landscaping in 98 public areas, pedestrian paths, the streetscape of Via Bellagio, and the park areas. Also included are the operation and maintenance of the streetlights within the neighborhood.

Zone 2: Zone 2 encompasses the Vintage Ranch subdivision and includes opera-on and maintenance of parks, environmentally sensi-ve areas, bike trails, streetscape, water basins, fencing, walls, street lighting, and a portion of traffic signals within the subdivision.

Zone 3: Zone 3 encompasses the Napa Junc-on mixed-use development consis-ng of phases I, II & III which includes the opera-on and maintenance of landscaping, streetscape, bikeways, water basins, park areas, fencing, street ligh-ng and a por-on of traffic signals serving the development. It also includes mowing the frontage along Highway 29 between Rio Del Mar and Napa Junction Road.

Assessment Methodology:

The Report includes a descrip-on of each zone in the LLAD, any proposed changes to the zones, the opposed costs to operate and maintain the improvements, the method of appor-onment (spread) of the assessments, the assessment roll for all parcels, and the assessment diagrams (maps). As mentioned above, there will be no annexations to the LLAD this fiscal year.

Assessment Calculation:

The ac-vi-es described in the report are paid for by assessments on parcels that derive special benefit from the ameni-es located within the LLAD. The assessments are updated annually in order account for changes in maintenance budgets and changes in development paCerns. Staff has verified the proposed FY 2024/25 assessments do not exceed the maximum assessment allowed.

The table below illustrates all of the proposed FY 2024/25 assessments:

Zone
Actual 22/23
Assessment
Actual 23/24
Assessment
Proposed 24/25
Assessment
Maximum 24/25
Assessment
1 $400.00 $422.40 $447.44 $707.51
2 $302.42 $319.36 $338.52 $1,084.51
3 $1,022.01/acre
($207.56/unit)
$1,079.22/acre
($219.18/unit)
$1,079.92/acre
($219.18/unit)
$2,307.89/acre
($396.62/unit)
Zone 1
The total proposed Zone 1 budget (Total Expenses) for FY 2024/25 is $378,133. This budget is based on current landscaping contracts, expected increases in landscaping contracts based on preliminary bids, historical cost review, and professional es-mates of labor efforts required to maintain the facilities.

The proposed Zone 1 annual assessment rate to levy and collect is proposed to be $447.44 per ESD.

This represents an increase of 6.00% but s-ll below the allowable maximum. The new maximum annual assessment for Zone 1 is $707.51 per ESD which includes the 3.67% CPI increase.

Zone 2
99 The total proposed Zone 2 budget (Total Expenses) for FY 2024/25 is $516,972. This budget is based on current landscaping contracts and expected increases based on preliminary bids, historical cost review, and professional estimates of labor efforts required to maintain the facilities.

The proposed funding will be $291,263 from FY 2024-25 assessments, and $225,710 from available reserves. This includes a $30,473 contribu-on from the general fund to account for general benefit for the use of Shenandoah and Silver Oak parks. Funds have been included in the in the FY 2024-25 budget for a permanent restroom at Silver Oak park. The proposed budget includes the full year maintenance funding for all facilities including the Environmentally Sensitive Areas.

The proposed Zone 2 annual assessment rate to levy and collect is proposed to be $338.52. This represents an increase of 6.00% but s-ll below the allowable maximum assessment. The new maximum annual assessment for Zone 2 is $1,084.51 per ESD which includes the 3.67% annual CPI increase.

Zone 3
The total proposed Zone 3 expenses for FY 2024-25 is $115,307. This budget is based on current landscaping contracts, expected increases in landscaping contracts based on preliminary bids, historical cost review, and professional es-mates of labor efforts required to maintain the facili-es.

The proposed funding will be $174,822 from FY 2024-25 assessments and $59,515 to reserves. No general fund contributions are proposed.

The proposed annual assessment to levy and collect for each parcel within Zone 3 is $1,079.22 per acre or por-on thereof plus $219.18 per ESD. There is no proposed increase in the assessment rate for FY 2024-25. The new maximum assessment is $2,392.50 per acre or por-on thereof and $396.62 per ESD. The new maximum assessments include the allowed 3.67% CPI increase.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is a General Fund impact by this ac-on in the amount of $30,473 for contribu-ons to Zone 2 for general public benefit use of Shenandoah and Silver Oak parks. The General Fund contribu-on is included in the proposed FY 2024/25 Opera-ng Budget. All other costs associated with the annual proceedings and the opera-on, maintenance, and administra-on of the Assessment District improvements are recovered from the assessments levied and collected on the parcels within each zone.

The total proposed Assessment District budget for FY 2024/25 for all three Zones is as follows:

As Preliminarily Filed with City
Zone 1 Budget $378,133
Zone 2 Budget $516,972
Zone 3 Budget $115,307
Operating Reserve Contributions ($141,321)
100
Capital Reserve Contributions ($194,500)
Balance to Assessment $674,591
A more detailed budget for each zone showing the prior year's expenses and projections for the next two fiscal years is shown in the aCached Engineer’s Report for FY 2024/25. This is done to provide each zone’s property owners with informa-on on trends and poten-al upcoming expenses, including planned capital expenditures.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The use or change of property assessments as a funding mechanism for the opera-ons and maintenance of landscaping and ligh-ng systems is not a project as defined in Sec-on 15378(b)(4) of the California Environmental Quality Act guidelines.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution - LLAD FY24-25

2. Exhibit A LLAD FY24/25 Preliminary Engineers Report
101
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-______

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON INITIATING PROCEEDINGS, PRELIMINARILY APPROVING THE 2024/25 ANNUAL ENGINEER’S REPORT, DECLARING THE INTENTION

TO LEVY AND COLLECT ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS, AND SETTING THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR

CONSIDERATION OF THE AMERICAN CANYON LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024/25 FOR MAY 21, 2024, AT 6:30 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL

CHAMBERS
WHEREAS, the American Canyon City Council has, by previous resolutions, formed and levied annual assessments for a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the “Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972” (the “1972 Act”), being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (commencing with Section 22500). Said special maintenance district is known and designated as “The American Canyon Consolidated Landscape and Lighting Assessment District” (the “District”). The District is comprised of several Zones which are identified below:

ZONE NUMBER AND NAME
Zone 1 – La Vigne
Zone 2 – Vintage Ranch
Zone 3 – Napa Junction
WHEREAS, the City Council has retained Harris & Associates for the purpose of assisting with the annual levy of the District and to prepare and file with the City Clerk, an Annual Assessment Report (the “Report”) for the District in accordance with the 1972 Act; and
WHEREAS, there has now been presented to this City Council the Report as required by the 1972 Act; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has carefully examined and reviewed the Report as presented and is preliminarily satisfied with the District, each of the budget items and documents therein, and is satisfied that the assessment amounts, on a preliminary basis, have been spread to the assessable parcels in accordance with the special benefit received from the improvements and services provided.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of American Canyon City Council does resolve as follows:

1. That the above recitals are true and correct.

2. Annual Assessment Report: The City hereby orders Harris & Associates to prepare and file with the City Clerk, the Report concerning the annual levy and collection of assessments for the District.

Said levy and collection shall be for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2024 and ending June 30, 2025 in accordance with Chapter 3, Section 22622 of the 1972 Act. The Report details the improvements, any substantial changes to the improvements, the annual budgets for each Zone and the proposed assessment amounts for each parcel.

3. Proposed Improvements: The improvements within the District may include, but are not limited to: turf, shrubs, plants and trees, parks, landscaping, street lighting, irrigation and drainage systems, graffiti removal, pedestrian walkways, landscape lighting, masonry walls, and associated appurtenances within the public rights-of-way or specific easements. Services provided include all necessary service, operations, administration and maintenance required to keep the 102
improvements in a healthy, vigorous and/or satisfactory operating condition. The specific improvements within each Zone are detailed in the Report.

4. Intention: The City Council hereby declares its intention to seek the annual levy and collection of assessments within the District pursuant to the 1972 Act, in order to pay for the costs of maintaining and servicing the above referenced improvements. The City Council finds that the public’s best interests will be served by such levy and collection.

5. Public Hearing: The City Council hereby declares its intention to conduct a Public Hearing annually concerning the levy of assessments for the Districts in accordance with Chapter 3, Section 22626 of the 1972 Act.

6. Notice: The City Council shall give notice of the time and place of the Public Hearing to all property owners within the District by causing the publishing of this Resolution once in the local newspaper not less than ten (10) days before the date of the Public Hearing and by posting a copy of this Resolution on the official bulletin board customarily used by the City for the posting of notices.

Any interested person may file a written protest with the City Clerk prior to the conclusion of the Public Hearing or, having previously filed a protest, may file a written withdrawal of that protest.

A written protest shall state all grounds of objection and a protest by a property owner shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by such property owner. All interested persons shall be afforded the opportunity to hear and be heard.

7. Notice of Public Hearing: Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing on these matters will be held by the City Council on the 21st day of May, 2024 at 6:30 p.m. at the City Council Chambers, located at 4381 Broadway Street, American Canyon.

8. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution by the City Council and is hereby authorized and directed to give notice of said Public Hearing as provided by the 1972 Act.

PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council of the City of American Canyon held on the 7th day of May, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
________________________________
Leon Garcia, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________ ______________________________ Taresa Geilfuss, CMC, City Clerk William D. Ross, City Attorney Attachments:

Exhibit A – City of American Canyon 2024/25 Annual Engineer’s Report 103

CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON
PRELIMINARY ENGINEER’S REPORT
FISCAL YEAR 2024-25

NAPA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING

ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
MAY 2024

PREPARED BY
Harris & Associates
1401 Willow Pass Road, Suite 500
Concord, CA 94520
www.weareharris.com
104
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25

CERTIFICATIONS
Certifications
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached was filed with me on the ________day of ______________, 2024.

Taresa Geilfuss, City Clerk
City of American Canyon, Napa County, CA
__________________________
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City of American Canyon, California on the ________day of ______________, 2024.

Taresa Geilfuss, City Clerk
City of American Canyon, Napa County, CA
__________________________
105
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents
Certifications i
Statement of Assessment Engineer 1
Plans and Specifications 3
Estimate of Costs 8
Method of Apportionment 15
Appendix A – Assessment Diagrams 20
Appendix B – Assessment Roll 24
106
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25
STATEMENT OF ASSESSMENT ENGINEER’S
Statement of Assessment Engineer
AGENCY: THE CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON
PROJECT: CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT TO: THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
The preparation of this Annual Engineer’s Report (“Report”) is in conformance with the obligation of the City Council for the American Canyon Landscape and Lighting Assessment District of the City of American Canyon to provide landscaping services upon each lot or parcel of land in the district in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel of land for Fiscal Year 2024-25.

Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Part 2 Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 22500) (“Act”), Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the State of California Constitution, and in accordance with the City of American Canyon’s Resolution being adopted by the City Council for:

CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT (Hereinafter referred to as the “District”),
I, Alison Bouley , authorized representative of the District, the duly appointed Assessment Engineer submit the following Report which consists of the following four (4) parts and Appendices:

PART I
Description of Improvements: This part provides a general description of improvements proposed to be maintained in the District. Plans and specifications for the improvements are on file with the District Engineer.

PART II
Estimate of Cost: This part contains the cost estimate of the proposed maintenance including incidental costs and expenses for Fiscal Year 2024-25.
107
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25

PART III
Method of Apportionment of the Assessments: This part describes the method of apportionment of assessments, based upon parcel classification of land within the District in proportion to the estimated special benefits to be received. The costs and expenses of the District have been assessed upon the parcels of land within the boundaries of District pursuant to the initial methodology established at the time of formation, in 2001. For particulars as to the identification of parcels, reference is made to the District Diagram.

Appendices
Appendix A – Assessment Diagrams for the District
Appendix B – Assessment Roll
In conclusion, it is my opinion that the costs and expenses of the District have been assessed to the lots and parcels within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each lot or parcel from the services provided.

DATED this day of , 2024
___________________________________________
Alison Bouley, P.E., Assessment Engineer
R.C.E. No. C61383
Engineer of Work

108
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25

3 PART I – PLANS AND SPECIFICATION
Plans and Specifications

PURPOSE
The purpose of this report is to set forth findings and the engineering analysis for the American Canyon Landscaping & Lighting District, City of American Canyon (City), for the subject year as directed by the City Council of the City of American Canyon (City Council), pursuant to Section 22620 of the Streets & Highways Code (Landscaping & Lighting Act of 1972) and Articles XIII C and D of the California State Constitution (Proposition 218).

BACKGROUND
The American Canyon Landscaping & Lighting Assessment District (Assessment District) was formed in January 2001 to provide a dedicated source of funds to cover the costs associated with the operation and maintenance of landscaping and lighting improvements which provide a special benefit to the parcels within the La Vigne Subdivision (Zone 1). Both Proposition 218 and the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 require that the Engineer’s Report approved at the time of formation for the District establish a method of assessment, a maximum assessment amount, and any escalation factors that will be used to allow the annual assessments to keep pace with inflation. In order to take inflation into account, the 2001 formation proceedings allowed assessments to be escalated in accordance with the All Urban Consumers (San Francisco Area) CPI from the U. S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Maximum Assessments may be increased annually by the approved inflation factor without the need to provide notices and assessment ballots to property owners within the Assessment District. However, if the City proposes increasing maximum assessments in an amount above the approved inflation factor, it must conduct an assessment balloting process in accordance with Proposition 218.

Once an Assessment District is created, it is possible to annex new zones or areas into existing zones as new subdivisions are developed and new facilities require maintenance. Since 2001, the Vintage Ranch Subdivision (Zone 2) and the Napa Junction Mixed Use Development (Zone 3) have been annexed into the Assessment District. In July of 2020, the Villages at Vintage Ranch, a 159 unit apartment complex was annexed into Zone 2. The same CPI escalator provision was also approved for these projects at the time they were annexed to the Assessment District.

The Landscaping & Lighting Act of 1972 requires that an Engineer's Report be prepared and adopted by the City Council each year, in order to levy and collect assessments in any following fiscal year. The City Council has appointed Harris & Associates as the Engineer of Work and directed the preparation and filing of this Annual Engineer's Report.

This Engineer's Report outlines the facilities to be maintained, the budgets proposed for this maintenance, and the assessments necessary to support these budgets. This Engineer’s Report documents any land use changes in the zones (i.e. new subdivisions) and any proposed annexations. This Engineer’s Report calculates the maximum allowable assessment for each zone based on the annual CPI escalator percentage (3.367% for 2024) and provides clear confirmation that the proposed assessments do not exceed the approved maximum including adjustments for inflation for each zone. 109
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25

4 The table below summarizes the maximum annual assessments allowed in Zones 1, 2 and 3, including the CPI increase, and compares these to the assessments proposed to be levied and collected in Fiscal Year (FY) 2023-24. As shown, the proposed assessment within each Zone is less than the Maximum Assessment allowed, thus Proposition 218 balloting is not required in any zone.

Notes:
1 Refer to “FY 2023-24 Annual Engineer’s Report” for details on FY 2023-24. 2 United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Statistics, All Urban Consumers CPI (San Francisco Area), Annual average 2022 to 2023 = 3.67 % (339.050/327.060 = 1.03665994).

The total proposed Assessments for FY 2024-25 for all three Zones is $674,591. Expenses include $1,010,112, with $141,321 contributed to operating reserves and $195,500 taken from capital reserves. The General Fund will also contribute a total of $30,473 to account for a portion of the general benefit conferred for use of the District parks, to parcels and/or individuals not within the District boundaries but within a one-half mile radius of the parks. This is based on the service radius of neighborhood parks as defined in the City’s Parks Master Plan.

FACILITIES
ZONE 1 – LA VIGNE
Improvements Maintained
Zone 1 provides for funding for the following improvements, illustrated on the Zone 1 Assessment Diagram found in Appendix A:

1. The maintenance and operation including repair, replacement, and servicing of street light standards, luminaries, wiring and appurtenances necessary to provide street lighting within Zone 1.

2. The installation, maintenance and operation to include repair, replacement and servicing of street trees, shrubs, planting and irrigation systems together with earth berms, slopes, curbs, root deflectors, decorative paving, masonry walls and concrete or wood appurtenances, all as delineated on the improvements plans for A.P.N. 059‐ 100‐006 prepared by Carlson, Barbee & Gibson, Inc. dated June 1, 1999 or as specified in the City of American Canyon Public Works Department, Engineering Division Standard Details and Specifications. Specifically this work includes the following:
110
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25

5 • Along the entire north side of Parcel A: landscaping and the public walkway adjacent to the creek running through La Vigne subdivision.
• Parcel B: landscape right‐of‐way area along east side of Flosden Road including the median area directly adjacent to parcel B; landscape and park area north of Parcel A and south of the north Via Bellagio entry including the entry monument and the median area in Via Bellagio and special amenities. • Parcel C: landscape right‐of‐way area along east side of Flosden Road including the median area directly adjacent to Parcel C; landscaping and detention basin landscaping including entry monument and special amenities and the median area within Via Bellagio.
• Parcel D: landscape right‐of‐way area along east side of Flosden Road, including the median area directly adjacent to Parcel D; landscaping and sound wall west of Parcel J including entry monument and special amenities.
• Parcel E: landscape right‐of‐way area along east side of Flosden Road including the median area directly adjacent to Parcel E and right‐of‐way area along south side of American Canyon Road to Via Firenze; median landscape areas within Via Firenze at the intersection of American Canyon Road, landscaping and sound wall north and west of La Vigne Unit 1 including entry monuments and special amenities. • Parcel F: landscape right‐of‐way area along south side of American Canyon Road to the wetlands restoration area, asphalt and DG trail, sound wall and landscape area north of Parcel F, entry monuments, and special amenities.
• Parcel G: Asphalt trail extending from Parcel F to southern subdivision boundary. • Parcel H: Special amenities and landscape within park site, “Via Bellagio Park”. • Parcel K: Special amenities and landscape within park site, “Pelleria Park”. • Via Bellagio including the entire length of the landscape right‐of‐way area from back of curb to face of sidewalk including ancillary medians that intersect Via Bellagio from adjoining parcels and neighborhoods.

Entry monuments are not included as they are noted in other parcel descriptions.

The assessments collected in the Zone may also fund any and all incidental expenses in connection therewith, all as more particularly authorized pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act.

Property Assessed
Zone 1 is built out and no new annexations are proposed for FY 2024-25. Zone 1 has 466.0 Equivalent Single Family Dwelling (ESD) units, the same as last year.

Proposed Budgets
All Zone 1 improvements have been completed and accepted. The total proposed Zone 1 budget (Total Expenses) for FY 2024-25 is $378,133. This budget is based on current landscaping contracts, expected increases in landscaping contracts based on preliminary bids, historical cost review, and professional estimates of labor efforts required to maintain the facilities.
111
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25

6 The proposed funding will be $208,507 from FY 2024-25 assessments, and $169,626 from available reserves.

A Capital Reserve and Replacement study was completed during the 2020-21 fiscal year to identify the increased services to be provided and to determine the annual costs to be assessed to the property owners for the eventual replacement of certain improvements. The Capital Reserve and Replacement study will also be used to project future assessments for the Zone, and funds will need to be accumulated to account for those additional costs. Funds were included in the FY 2023-24 budget for several capital improvement projects, including resurfacing the playground at Via Bellagio Park, irrigation controller upgrades and replacement of the playground bark. These projects have all been completed as of Fiscal Year 2024-25.

Proposed Assessments
The proposed Zone 1 annual assessment rate to levy and collect is proposed to be $447.44 per ESD. This represents an increase of 6.00% but still below the allowable maximum assessment. The new maximum annual assessment for Zone 1 is $707.51 per ESD which includes the 3.67% annual CPI increase.

ZONE 2 – VINTAGE RANCH
Improvements Maintained
Zone 2 provides funding for the maintenance of landscaping, public walkways, creeks and their related improvements, creek trails, landscaping related to water quality basins and ponds, streetscapes, Class 1 bikeways, walls and fences, maintenance and electricity of street lighting, a portion of intersection traffic signals, and parks within Vintage Ranch.

The Assessment Diagram in Appendix A illustrates the location of these improvements including:
• Silver Oak Park, “LOT A”
• Shenandoah Park, “LOT H”
• PG&E Linear Park, “LOT F”
• Environmentally sensitive areas located on Lots A, C, D, G & in setback areas and ponds 1 • The Creek Trail System along the south side of the tract, north of parcel C • Streetscapes within Vintage Ranch, including landscaped areas at the end of Farentino and the end of the Newhall right-of-way (at the dead end)
• The Class 1 Bikeway on Newell Drive
• Fence and Wall Maintenance
• Water Quality Basins 1, 2, 3 & 4
• Street Lighting
• 25% of the traffic signals at Flosden and American Canyon Road; Silver Oak and American Canyon Road, Newell and Silver Oak, and Donaldson and Highway 29
The assessments collected may also fund any and all incidental expenses in connection therewith, all as more particularly authorized pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972.

Property Assessed
The FY 2024-25 assessments are proposed to be levied on 860.40 ESD units, which remain unchanged from the ESD units the previous year, as this zone is fully developed. Part III provides additional discussion and findings related to 112
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25

7 the benefits provided by the zone and the parcels that receive these benefits.

In Fiscal Year 2020-21, the Villages at Vintage Ranch, a 159 unit apartment complex on the northeast corner of American Canyon Road and Highway 29, was annexed into Zone 2 of the LLAD. This annexation increased the Zone ESD by 95.40, bring the total Zone ESD to 860.40 beginning in 2020-21 as mentioned above.

Proposed Budgets
The total proposed Zone 2 budget (Total Expenses) for FY 2024-25 is $516,972. This budget is based on current landscaping contracts and expected increases based on preliminary bids, historical cost review, and professional estimates of labor efforts required to maintain the facilities.

The proposed funding will be $291,263 from FY 2024-25 assessments, and $225,710 from available reserves. This includes a $30,473 contribution from the general fund to account for general benefit for the use of Shenandoah and Silver Oak parks. Funds have been included in the FY 2024-25 budget for a capital improvement project to include a permanent restroom at Silver Oak Park.

The proposed budget includes the full year maintenance funding for all facilities including the Environmentally Sensitive Areas.

Proposed Assessments
The proposed Zone 2 annual assessment rate to levy and collect is proposed to be $338.52. This represents an increase of 6.00% but still below the allowable maximum assessment. The new maximum annual assessment for Zone 2 is $1,084.51 per ESD which includes the 3.67% annual CPI increase.

ZONE 3 – NAPA JUNCTION MIXED USE PROJECT
Improvements Maintained
Zone 3 maintains landscaping, streetscape, bikeways, landscaping related to water basins, park areas, fencing, street lighting and traffic signals within the Napa Junction Mixed Use Project. The Assessment Diagram in Appendix A illustrates the location of these improvements specifically:
• Streetscapes
• Class 1 Bikeways
• Highway 29 Ditch (Water Quality Basin 1)
• Small Park (Water Quality Basin 3)
• Street Lighting
• 25% of the traffic signal at Eucalyptus and Highway 29 • Caltrans right-of-way maintenance along the westerly border of the zone adjacent to the Napa Junction Phase I & II commercial development
• Improvements along the north and south sides of Napa Junction Road as part of the Napa Junction III development
• Multi-Use path/utility access road along the western property line of the Napa Junction III development 113
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25

8 • Parcel 4 – Open space and wetlands parcel
The assessments collected may also fund any and all incidental expenses in connection therewith, all as more particularly authorized pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972.

Property Assessed
During the annexation proceedings for Zone 3, it was determined the benefits received from certain improvements would be more equitably spread by the acreage, or portion thereof, of each parcel while the benefits received from certain other improvements would be more equitably spread by Equivalent Single Family Dwelling (ESD) units.

Zone 3 therefore, has a two-part assessment formula that includes both ESD units and Acres. The Method of Apportionment of Assessment (Part C) includes a complete description of the methodology used to calculate assessments.

The FY 2024-25 assessments are proposed to be levied on 570.92 ESD units which is the same number of units from the previous year. The FY 2024-25 assessments are proposed to be levied on 46.40 acres which is also the same number of acres from the previous year. No annexations are proposed for FY 2024-25.

A mixed use (multi-family residential/commercial) development (commonly referred to as Napa Junction III), Assessor Parcel Number (APN) 059-020-001-000 was annexed into Zone 3 during the FY 2015-16 annual assessment process. It will be a phased development with street lighting and landscaping improvements to be serviced as a part of the overall Zone 3 budget. Because there were improvements in place to maintain during FY 2016-17, these new parcels were assessed the same rate as those within Napa Junction I & II beginning in FY 2016-17.

Proposed Budgets
The total proposed Zone 3 expenses for FY 2024-25 is $115,307. This budget is based on current landscaping contracts, expected increases in landscaping contracts based on preliminary bids, historical cost review, and professional estimates of labor efforts required to maintain the facilities. The proposed funding will be $174,822 from FY 2024-25 assessments and $59,515 to reserves. No general fund contributions are proposed.

Proposed Assessments
The proposed annual assessment to levy and collect for each parcel within Zone 3 is $1,079.22 per acre or portion thereof plus $219.18 per ESD. There is no proposed increase in the assessment rate for FY 2024-25. The new maximum assessment is $2,392.50 per acre or portion thereof and $396.62 per ESD. The new maximum assessments include the allowed 3.67% CPI increase.
114
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25

9 PART II – COST ESTIMATE
Cost Estimate
The attached sheets include the budgets for FY 2024-25 for all those costs associated with the operation and maintenance in Zones 1, 2, and 3 within the Assessment District. The budget format has been modified to more closely match the format of the City’s Annual Budget. The total budget summary for FY 2024-25 for the Assessment District is as follows:

The planned capital expenditures for each Zone for Fiscal Year 2024-25 are shown in the budget for each Zone and will be funded using the available Capital Reserve Funds for that Zone.

The budgets shown on the following pages for each Zone reflect the FY 2022-23 Actual Budgets, the FY 2023-24 Estimated Year End amounts, and the Proposed Budgets for FY 2024-25. The Projected Budgets for FY 2025-26 are also shown and are based upon the Proposed Budgets for FY 2024-25 with a projected cost increases of 2% per year where applicable or as shown on the budget page. The year-to-date FY 2023-24 expenditures are available on the City’s website or the City’s Finance Division.

The budgets for each Zone also show the estimated fund balance (unrestricted, or Operating Reserve and restricted, or Capital Reserve) for the zone. Also shown for each Zone, is the Maximum Allowable Assessment based upon the annual change the Consumer Price Index as approved at the time the Assessment District was formed, the recommended Assessments for FY 2024-25, and the level of assessment that would be required to fully fund the Assessment District if funds from the reserve fund(s) were not used/available to reduce the total amount which needed to be levied. 115
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25

10 Actual
2022-23
Estimated YE
2023-24
Proposed
Budget
2024-25
Projected
Budget
2025-26

MAINTENANCE COSTS
General Repairs & Maintenance (Code 261-85-430-42310) $ 85,546 $ 96,454 $ 304,500 $ 134,740 Annual Maintenance Contract $ - $ - $ 87,000 $ 88,740
Playground Equipment Replacement $ - $ - $ - $ -
On-Site Inspection/Assessment of Facilities $ - $ - $ - $ - Playground Surface Maintenance $ - $ - $ - $ 5,000
Tree Maintenance/Trimming Crown Reduction $ - $ - $ 160,000 $ 10,000 Streetlight/Lamp Maintenance $ - $ - $ 5,000 $ 5,000
Open Space Fire Break $ - $ - $ - $ -
DG Pathway Repairs $ - $ - $ 5,000 $ 5,000
Wood and Wire Fence Repairs $ - $ - $ 20,000 $ 5,000
Replacement Plantings $ - $ - $ 7,500 $ 6,000
Bark Replacement $ - $ - $ - $ 10,000
Irrigation Repairs $ - $ - $ 20,000 $ -
Utilities - Electric (Code 261-85-430-43210) $ 12,522 $ 12,212 $ 17,000 $ 17,680 Utilities - Water (Code 261-85-430-43230) $ 25,713 $ 31,252 $ 35,200 $ 42,240 SUBTOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS $ 123,781 $ 139,919 $ 356,700 $ 194,660

CAPITAL PROJECT/REPAIRS COSTS
Recycled Water Conversion-Infrastructure Prep. (Code 261-85-430-42310) $ - $ - $ - $ - Via Bellagio Playground Resurface $ - $ 150,000 $ - $ - Playground Bark Replacement $ - $ 40,000 $ - $ -
Irrigation Control Upgrades $ - $ 94,513 $ - $ -
Refresh Flosden Road South Landscaping $ - $ - $ - $ -
SUBTOTAL CAPITAL PROJECT COSTS $ - $ 284,513 $ - $ -

RESERVE CONTRIBUTIONS
Capital Reserve Contribution (Code XFER TO RESERVE) $ 10,000 $ 132,519 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 SUBTOTAL RESERVE COSTS $ 10,000 $ 132,519 $ 10,000 $ 10,000

DISTRICT EXPENSES
Engineering Contract Services (Code 261-85-430-42130 & 42190) $ 6,502 $ 6,502 $ 11,200 $ 11,200 Napa County Auditor Charges (Code 261-85-430-42290) $ 233 $ 233 $ 233 $ 233 SUBTOTAL DISTRICT EXPENSES $ 6,735 $ 6,735 $ 11,433 $ 11,433 TOTAL EXPENSES $ 140,516 $ 563,686 $ 378,133 $ 216,093
Collections/(Credits) Applied to Levy
Unrestricted/Operating Reserve Collection/(Transfer) $ 45,884 $ (82,335) $ (169,626) $ (3,416) Capital Improvement Fund Collection/(Transfer) $ - $ (284,513) $ - $ - General Fund Loan Repayment/(Advance) $ - $ - $ - $ -
$ 45,884 $ (366,848) $ (169,626) $ (3,416)
Balance to Levy (Budgeted) $ 186,400 $ 196,838 $ 208,507 $ 212,677 Applied Charge $ 186,400 $ 196,838 $ 208,507 $ 212,677

FUND BALANCE INFORMATION
Est. Unrestricted/Operating Reserve Fund Balance 7/1 $ 320,190 $ 366,073 $ 284,807 $ 117,181 Reserve Fund Adjustments $ 45,884 $ (82,335) $ (169,626) $ (3,416) Prior/Penalities/Public Damage $ - $ - $ - $ -
Interest $ - $ 1,068 $ 2,000 $ 2,000
Projected Unrestricted/Operating Reserve Balance end of year 6/30 $ 366,073 $ 284,807 $ 117,181 $ 115,765 Est. Restricted/Capital Reserve Fund Balance 7/1 $ 181,994 $ 191,994 $ 40,000 $ 50,000 Contributions $ 10,000 $ 132,519 $ 10,000 $ 10,000
Reserve Fund Adjustments $ - $ (284,513) $ - $ -
Projected Restricted/Capital Reserve Balance end of year 6/30 $ 191,994 $ 40,000 $ 50,000 $ 60,000 Reserve Total $ 558,067 $ 324,807 $ 167,181 $ 175,765
Transfer/(Contribution) from Unrestricted Operating Reserves $ 45,884 $ (82,335) $ (169,626) $ (3,416) Transfer/(Contribution) from Capital Reserves $ - $ (284,513) $ - $ - BALANCE TO ASSESSMENT $ 186,400 $ 196,838 $ 208,507 $ 212,677 Total Revenue at Maximum Rate $ 301,180 $ 318,040 $ 329,700 $ 336,294 Variance above/(below) Maximum Revenue $ (114,780) $ (121,202) $ (121,193) $ (123,616) Maximum Allowable Assessment $ 646.31 $ 682.49 $ 707.51 $ 721.66 Assessment to Fully Fund Maintenance Costs and Reserve Contributions $ 323.00 $ 883.46 $ 832.90 $ 485.18 Actual/Proposed Assessment $ 400.00 $ 422.40 $ 447.44 $ 456.39

TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
ZONE 1 - LA VIGNE SUBDIVISION
FY 2024-25 BUDGET
116
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25

11 Actual
2022-23
Estimated
YE 2023-24
Proposed
Budget
2024-25
Projected
Budget
2025-26

MAINTENANCE COSTS
General Repairs & Maintenance (Code 262-85-430-42310 & 43115) $ 136,613 $ 187,033 $ 248,100 $ 199,976 Annual Maintenance Contract $ - $ - $ 146,100 $ 149,022 NEW Village at Vintage Ranch Frontage Landscaping Maintenance $ - $ - $ 15,000 $ 5,000 Traffic Signal Maintenance $ - $ - $ 1,500 $ 1,500
On-Site Inspection/Assessment of Facilities $ - $ - $ - $ - Grazing Open Space areas in Zone $ - $ - $ 22,700 $ 23,154 PW - Streets - Streetlight/lamp maintenance (DC Electric) $ - $ - $ 9,000 $ - Service Portable Restrooms $ - $ - $ 6,300 $ 6,300
Wood and Wire Fence Repairs $ - $ - $ 20,000 $ 5,000
Irrigation Repairs $ - $ - $ 20,000 $ -
Replace Playground Bark $ - $ - $ - $ 10,000
Garbage Can Replacements $ - $ - $ 7,500 $ -
Utilities - Electric (Code 262-85-430-43210) $ 22,894 $ 41,462 $ 32,000 $ 33,280 Utilities - Water (Code 262-85-430-43230) $ 12,488 $ 38,846 $ 60,000 $ 72,000 SUBTOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS $ 171,995 $ 267,341 $ 340,100 $ 305,256

CAPITAL PROJECT/REPAIRS COSTS
Tuscan Oak/Rolling Hills Landscape Reno $ - $ - $ - $ - Shenandoah Drive Landscape Reno $ - $ - $ - $ -
Silver Oak Park Restroom $ - $ - $ 164,500 $ -
Shenandoah Park Landscape Reno $ - $ - $ - $ -
Repair/Replace Picnic Tables-8ea. (Code 262-85-430-42310) $ - $ 3,600 $ - $ - Newell Dr. West Side ROW Renovatin $ - $ - $ - $ -
Irrigation Control Upgrades $ - $ 144,305 $ - $ -
Silver Oak Picnic Cover (Code 262-85-430-42310) $ - $ - $ - $ - Refresh landscaping at Entry Monuments $ - $ - $ - $ -
Playground Resurface @ Shenandoah (Code 262-85-430-42310) $ - $ 19,373 $ - $ - SUBTOTAL CAPITAL PROJECT COSTS $ - $ 167,278 $ 164,500 $ -

RESERVE CONTRIBUTIONS
General Fund Contribution for Parks (General Benefit) $ - $ (30,473) $ (30,473) $ (30,473) Capital Reserve Contribution (Code XFER TO RESERVE) $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 SUBTOTAL RESERVE COSTS $ 25,000 $ (5,473) $ (5,473) $ (5,473)

DISTRICT EXPENSES
Engineering Contract Services (Code 262-85-430-42130 & 42190) $ 7,962 $ 7,962 $ 17,462 $ 17,462 Napa County Auditor Charges (Code 262-85-430-42290) $ 383 $ 383 $ 383 $ 383 SUBTOTAL DISTRICT EXPENSES $ 8,344 $ 8,345 $ 17,845 $ 17,845 TOTAL EXPENSES $ 205,339 $ 437,490 $ 516,972 $ 317,628
Collections/(Credits) Applied to Levy
Unrestricted/Operating Reserve Collection/(Transfer) $ 26,012 $ 4,565 $ (61,210) $ (20,540) Capital Improvement Fund Collection/(Transfer) $ - $ (167,278) $ (164,500) $ - General Fund Loan Repayment/(Advance) $ - $ - $ - $ -
$ 26,012 $ (162,713) $ (225,710) $ (20,540)
Balance to Levy (Budgeted) $ 231,351 $ 274,777 $ 291,263 $ 297,088 Applied Charge $ 231,351 $ 274,777 $ 291,263 $ 297,088

FUND BALANCE INFORMATION
Est. Unrestricted/Operating Reserve Fund Balance 7/1 $ 384,321 $ 410,333 $ 423,144 $ 377,935 Reserve Fund Adjustments $ 26,012 $ 4,565 $ (61,210) $ (20,540) Prior/Penalities/Public Damage $ - $ - $ - $ -
Interest $ - $ 8,246 $ 16,000 $ 16,000
Projected Unrestricted/Operating Reserve Balance end of year 6/30 $ 410,333 $ 423,144 $ 377,935 $ 373,394 Est. Restricted/Capital Reserve Fund Balance 7/1 $ 606,295 $ 631,295 $ 458,544 $ 288,572 Contributions $ 25,000 $ (5,473) $ (5,473) $ (5,473)
Reserve Fund Adjustments $ - $ (167,278) $ (164,500) $ - Projected Restricted/Capital Reserve Balance end of year 6/30 $ 631,295 $ 458,544 $ 288,572 $ 283,099 Reserve Total $ 1,041,628 $ 881,689 $ 666,506 $ 656,493 Transfer/(Contribution) from Unrestricted Operating Reserves $ 26,012 $ 4,565 $ (61,210) $ (20,540) Transfer/(Contribution) from Capital Reserves $ - $ (167,278) $ (164,500) $ - BALANCE TO ASSESSMENT $ 231,351 $ 274,777 $ 291,263 $ 297,088 Total Revenue at Maximum Rate $ 757,886 $ 900,116 $ 933,114 $ 951,777 Variance above/(below) Maximum Revenue $ (526,534) $ (625,339) $ (641,852) $ (654,689) Maximum Allowable Assessment $ 990.70 $ 1,046.16 $ 1,084.51 $ 1,106.20 Assessment to Fully Fund Maintenance Costs and Reserve Contributions $ 301.10 $ 307.69 $ 403.30 $ 362.80 Actual/Proposed Assessment $ 302.42 $ 319.36 $ 338.52 $ 345.29

TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
ZONE 2 VINTAGE RANCH SUBDIVISION
FY 2024-25 BUDGET
117
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25

12 Actual
2022-23
Estimated
YE 2023-24
Proposed
Budget
2024-25
Projected
Budget
2025-26

MAINTENANCE COSTS
General Repair & Maintenance (Code 263-85-430-42310) $ 54,728 $ 49,149 $ 69,300 $ 54,240 Annual Maintenance Contract $ - $ - $ 47,000 $ 47,940
Tree Replacement/Planting $ - $ - $ 10,000 $ 2,000
Irrigation Repairs $ - $ - $ 10,000 $ -
CalTrans Traffic Signal Maintenance $ - $ - $ 1,500 $ - Streetlight/Lamp Maintenance $ - $ - $ 800 $ 800
On-Site Inspection/Assessment of Facilities $ - $ - $ - $ - Service Portable Restrooms $ - $ - $ - $ 3,500
NJ Split Rail Fence Repair $ - $ - $ 30,000 $ -
Utilities - Electric (Code 263-85-430-43210) $ 594 $ 507 $ 900 $ 936 Utilities - Water (Code 263-85-430-43230) $ 42,100 $ 3,779 $ 6,900 $ 8,280 SUBTOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS $ 97,422 $ 53,435 $ 77,100 $ 117,696

CAPITAL PROJECT/REPAIRS COSTS
Play structure repair/replacement (Code 263-85-430-42310) $ - $ - $ - $ - Seating wall repairs (Code 263-85-430-42310) $ - $ - $ - $ - NJ3 Split Rail Fence Repairs $ - $ 10,000 $ - $ -
Walmart Driveway Reno $ - $ - $ - $ -
Main Street Park Improvements $ - $ - $ 30,000 $ 120,000 Playground Resurface @ Main St. Park (Code 263-85-430-42310) $ - $ - $ - $ - Irrigation Control Upgrades $ - $ - $ - $ -
Water and Landscaping for Phase 3 $ - $ 67,899 $ - $ -
Basin modifications - All remaining Phases (Code 263-85-430-42310) $ - $ - $ - $ - SUBTOTAL CAPITAL PROJECT COSTS $ - $ 77,899 $ 30,000 $ 120,000

RESERVE CONTRIBUTIONS
Capital Reserve Contribution(Code XFER TO RESERVE) $ - $ - $ - $ - SUBTOTAL RESERVE COSTS $ - $ - $ - $ -

DISTRICT EXPENSES
Engineering Contract Services (Code 263-85-430-42130 & 42190) $ 4,114 $ 4,114 $ 8,200 $ 8,200 I Other Professional Services (Code 263-85-430-42160) $ - $ - $ - $ - Napa County Auditor Charges (Code 263-85-430-42290) $ 7 $ 7 $ 7 $ 7 SUBTOTAL DISTRICT EXPENSES $ 4,121 $ 4,121 $ 8,207 $ 8,207 TOTAL EXPENSES $ 101,543 $ 135,456 $ 115,307 $ 245,903
Collections/(Credits) Applied to Levy
Unrestricted/Operating Reserve Collection/(Transfer) $ 8,138 $ 117,265 $ 89,515 $ 52,415 Capital Improvement Fund Collection/(Transfer) $ - $ (77,899) $ (30,000) $ (120,000) General Fund Loan Repayment/(Advance) $ - $ - $ - $ -
Other Revenues/(General Fund Contributions) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 8,138 $ 39,366 $ 59,515 $ (67,585)
Balance to Levy (Budgeted) $ 109,681 $ 174,822 $ 174,822 $ 178,318 Applied Charge $ 165,553 $ 174,822 $ 174,822 $ 178,318

FUND BALANCE INFORMATION
Est. Unrestricted/Operating Reserve Fund Balance 7/1 $ 1,068,546 $ 1,076,684 $ 1,202,780 $ 1,312,295 Reserve Fund Adjustments $ 8,138 $ 117,265 $ 89,515 $ 52,415 Transfer from/(to) Restricted Fund Balance $ - $ - $ - $ - Prior/Penalities/Public Damage $ - $ - $ - $ -
Interest $ - $ 8,831 $ 20,000 $ 20,000
Projected Unrestricted/Operating Reserve Balance end of year 6/30 $ 1,076,684 $ 1,202,780 $ 1,312,295 $ 1,384,710 Est. Restricted/Capital Reserve Fund Balance 7/1 $ 268,080 $ 268,080 $ 190,181 $ 160,181 Contributions $ - $ - $ - $ -
Reserve Fund Adjustments $ - $ (77,899) $ (30,000) $ (120,000) Transfer from/(to) Unrestricted Fund Balance $ - $ - $ - $ - Projected Restricted/Capital Reserve Balance end of year 6/30 $ 268,080 $ 190,181 $ 160,181 $ 40,181 Reserve Total $ 1,344,764 $ 1,392,961 $ 1,472,476 $ 1,424,891 Transfer/(Contribution) from Unrestricted Operating Reserves $ 8,138 $ 117,265 $ 89,515 $ 52,415 Transfer/(Contribution) from Capital Reserves $ - $ (77,899) $ (30,000) $ (120,000) BALANCE TO ASSESSMENT $ 109,681 $ 174,822 $ 174,822 $ 178,318 Total Revenue at Maximum Rate (ESD) $ 206,850 $ 218,428 $ 226,436 $ 230,965 Variance above/(below) Maximum Revenue (ESD) $ (131,389) $ (98,151) $ (106,159) $ (108,282) Total Revenue at Maximum Rate (Acre) $ 100,622 $ 106,255 $ 110,151 $ 112,354 Variance above/(below) Maximum Revenue (Acre) $ (66,402) $ (51,711) $ (55,606) $ (56,718) ESD Budget total (includes ratio of overhead costs) $ 75,461 $ 120,277 $ 120,277 $ 122,683 Acreage Budget total (includes ratio of overhead costs) $ 34,221 $ 54,544 $ 54,544 $ 55,635 Estimated Number of ESD Units 570.92 570.92 570.92 570.92 Estimated assessable Acres 46.04 46.04 46.04 46.04
Maximum Allowable Assessment per ESD $ 362.31 $ 382.59 $ 396.62 $ 404.55 Assessment to Fully Fund Maintenance Costs and Res. Contr. per ESD $ 122.37 $ 163.23 $ 138.95 $ 296.33 Actual/Proposed Assessment per ESD $ 207.56 $ 219.18 $ 219.18 $ 223.56 Maximum Allowable Assessment per Acre $ 2,185.54 $ 2,307.89 $ 2,392.50 $ 2,440.35 Assessment to Fully Fund Maintenance Costs and Res. Contr. per Acre $ 688.13 $ 917.94 $ 781.40 $ 1,666.41 Actual/Proposed Assessment per Acre $ 1,022.01 $ 1,079.22 $ 1,079.22 $ 1,100.80

TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT
ZONE 3 - NAPA JUNCTION MIXED USE PROJECT
FY 2024-25 BUDGET
118
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25

13 The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget:

Maintenance Cost
General Repairs and Maintenance (Code-42310): This item includes the costs of materials, supplies and contract services for the repair and/or maintenance of district facilities and improvements including irrigation system repairs, maintenance of landscaping related to water quality basins and appurtenant facilities, repairs to play structures, concrete or asphalt pathways, decorative entry walls and other improvements as listed in this report within the District. This item also includes costs of incidental miscellaneous materials and supplies used by City staff for the maintenance and repair of Assessment District improvements.

Electric (Code-43210): This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers, and street lights.

Water (Code-43230): This item includes the costs to furnish irrigation water for the landscaping within the District.

Capital Repair/Maintenance Costs
Funds will be transferred annually from the restricted reserve fund balance within each zone as needed to fund the completion of the projects listed in the current year’s budget for each of the zones. Any funds not expended will remain in the restricted reserve until needed for the completion of future capital projects or major maintenance activities. This will include the replacement/rehabilitation of the facilities shown in the capital reserve plan which is being developed for each zone.

District Expenses
Engineering Contract Services (Code-42130): This item includes the costs for the preparation of the Annual Engineer’s Report and Assessment Roll as required by law for the placement of the assessments on the property tax roll.

Inspection/Contract Documents/LLAD Administration (Code-48115): This item includes the costs of all departments and staff and consultants of the City for providing the coordination of District services, contract management, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, and procedural matters associated with the District.

Napa County Auditor Charges (Code-42290): This item includes the cost charged by the County for the placement and collection of the assessments on the County Property Tax roll. 119
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25

14 Reserve Funds
Un-Restricted/Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs.

Repair/Replacement – Restricted/Capital Reserve: This item includes funds for the repair/replacement of improvements or the installation of new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to the repair/replacement of improvements at the end of their useful life, upgrading or enhancement of improvements within the District, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events where the costs cannot be covered by the annual assessment levy.

General Fund Contribution for Parks: This item accounts for the general benefit portion of the maintenance costs for parks and the special benefit to parcels outside the district boundary.

Neighborhood Park Service Area: The City of American Canyon’s Parks Master Plan establishes a standard service radius of one-half mile for neighborhood parks. This means any parcels located within a half-mile radius of a neighborhood park could potentially receive benefit from that park because all residents can access and use the park amenities.

The parks were installed as a condition of development and as a part of the specific developments surrounding the parks. Those parks confer a special benefit to the parcels within Neighborhood Park Service Area, of which those developments are located and can be assessed. There are also parcels outside the District boundary that receive special benefit from the park improvements. The parcels within the District may only be assessed for their share of special benefit from the park improvements. The share of special benefit received by parcels outside the District must be funded by sources other than District assessments, they cannot be assessed to the parcels within the District.

The General Fund Contribution for Parks, shown on the District budget pages, accounts for the portion of special benefit conferred to parcels outside the District but inside a one-half mile radius of the parks, as well as the general benefit portion. A portion of this contribution is also from rental revenue received from individuals renting the park for personal activities.
120
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25

15 PART III – METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
Method of Apportionment
Initial apportionment information relating to all zones and made a part of this report by reference here, can be found in the City of American Canyon Maintenance District No. 2001‐02‐ (A.P.N. 059‐100‐006) Engineer's Report, Establishment of District and Assessments for FY 2001‐02, Part D, City of American Canyon Maintenance District No. 2001‐02‐ (A.P.N. 059‐ 100‐006) Method of Assessment. The following is a brief description of the manner the annual assessment has been apportioned to each parcel in Zones 1, 2 and 3 within the Assessment District consistent with the approved method.

GENERAL
Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, permits the establishment of assessment districts by cities for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include operation, maintenance, rehabilitation and servicing of street lights, traffic signals, parks and landscaping.

The 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. Section 22573 provides that:
"The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The Act permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Thus, the 1972 Act requires the levy of a true "assessment" rather than a "special tax." In addition, Prop. 218 requires that a parcel's assessment may not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel. Prop. 218 provides that only special benefits are assessable and the City must separate the general benefits from the special benefits.

SPECIAL BENEFIT ANALYSIS
The Assessment District provides for the maintenance and repair of public parks and landscaping, landscaping related to water quality basins, environmentally sensitive areas, trail, bikeways, streetlights and traffic signals. As determined at the time of formation, when these facilities are well maintained and in good working order they provide benefits that are unique and special to the property within the district including:
121
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25
16 • Satisfaction of project design and mitigation requirements included within the CEQA documents for the development included in each zone. Satisfying these requirements uniquely benefits the property in the zone because it allows the various land uses being developed. • Satisfaction of Conditions of Approval for the development included in each zone. Satisfying these requirements uniquely benefits the property in the zone because it allows the various land uses being developed. • Provision of public safety benefits resulting from well-lit streets. Street lighting uniquely benefits the property within the zones that is adjacent to the lighting provided. • Provision of public safety benefits resulting from functioning traffic signals. Traffic signals benefit property within the zone by providing for safe ingress and egress from the property. Traffic signals also provide general benefits to all motorists that are able to travel safely on the roadway system. Twenty-five percent of the traffic signal maintenance costs are allocated to the benefitting zones reflecting the approximate amount of trips associated with development in the zones.
• Provision of public safety benefits resulting from the maintenance of water quality detention basins. The water quality detention basins are part of the storm water management system which allows for adequate drainage and prevents flooding and destruction of landscape amenities within the zones. Adequate drainage and protection from flooding is a unique and special benefit to the properties within the zones. • Provision of public recreation benefits resulting from the parks and open spaces. The parks and open spaces within each zone are designed as local features that are integrated within the development and easily accessible to neighboring properties. These features are part of the overall park system, which also includes community facilities, which provide more regionally appropriate facilities (ball fields etc.). The local parks and open spaces uniquely benefit the property within each zone because they have been designed to be accessible and useful for the developed property in each zone.
• Provision of aesthetic benefits resulting from parks, open space and other landscaping features. The parks, open space and landscaping features are internal or directly adjacent to the properties in the zone, hence the aesthetic benefits provided from well-maintained landscaping features are experienced by the properties in the zone.
• Provision of public safety benefits resulting from the maintenance of parks and open spaces. Unmaintained parks and open spaces can attract litter, vectors and other undesirable features that create health and safety problems for adjoining properties. Adequate maintenance uniquely benefits the property in each zone because these potentially adverse effects do not occur.
122
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25

17 GENERAL BENFIT ANALYSIS
Although the improvements may be visible to passersby or to the public at large, the improvements were installed as a requirement of the development of the zones and are designed for the benefit of properties within the zones. As mentioned above, the City contributes funds from the general fund to account for park usage by residents living outside the zones. This contribution was determined by identifying and separating the special and general benefit portions of the costs to maintain the parks. The City also makes contributions for landscaping improvements, upgrades and replacements, acknowledging that there is some general benefit from the landscaping conferred to all residents of the City.

METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
ZONES 1 AND 2 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT
The method of apportionment (spread) equates all parcels in Zones 1 and 2 to an Equivalent Single Family Dwelling (ESD) unit, or portion thereof. The following ESD units were established for the American Canyon Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District, at its formation, and reflect the relative benefit accruing to parcels of land, in various stages of development, from the landscape and lighting facilities:

1. Vacant parcel in undeveloped area 1/10 unit

2. Vacant parcel in developed area 1/2 unit

3. Single dwelling parcel 1 unit

4. Multi-Family dwelling 0.60 unit
Vacant parcels in undeveloped areas experience the benefits provided from satisfying approval conditions but not the full benefits experienced when the facilities maintained by the zone are operational hence they are assigned 1/10 of an ESD unit. Vacant parcels in developed areas experience the benefits provided from satisfying approval conditions and the public safety benefits associated with sound drainage systems. These parcels also experience some fraction of the benefits associated with safe lighting and ingress and egress but not at the same level as a fully developed parcel, hence they are assigned 1/2 of an ESD unit. Fully developed parcels experience all benefits provided by the zone. Because the land uses on both Zone 1 and 2 are relatively uniform single family dwelling units, benefits are experienced equally. This relative equality of benefits results in an assessment methodology that spreads costs equally at full build out.

ESD units for each zone are determined annually based on the development pattern. Each zone's operation and maintenance expenses for the upcoming fiscal year is then divided by the total number of ESD units in order to calculate the annual cost per ESD unit (assessment rate) for the upcoming fiscal year. The annual assessment for each parcel is calculated by multiplying the annual cost per ESD unit (assessment rate) by the total number ESD units on the parcel in the upcoming fiscal year.
123
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25
18 The method of apportionment for Zones 1 and 2 can be expressed mathematically as:

Cost per ESD Unit (Rate) = Fiscal Year Budget for Zone / Total Number of ESD Units in Zone Assessment per Parcel = Cost per ESD Unit (Rate) x No. of ESD Units on Parcel Although Section 22663 of the Streets and Highways Code typically requires that public property not be assessed, Article XIII, Section 4(a) of Proposition 218 requires that public property shall not be exempt from assessment if the property benefits from the facilities being maintained.

Zones 1 and 2 include publicly owned property which is utilized for parks, creeks, open spaces, public right-of-way and easements. These properties serve to provide landscape, open space, drainage and recreational benefits to the adjoining residential property. Because these properties provide special benefits rather than receive special benefits they do not receive an annual assessment.

Likewise school sites, which provide for open space and recreational opportunities, enhance the special benefits received by residential property. In addition, school locations are required by the approval documents for the development and therefore help provide the special benefits associated with compliance with project CEQA documents and conditions of approval. Therefore because these properties provide benefits rather than receive benefits, they are also not assessed.

Civic properties including public safety facilities and utility facilities which were constructed as a condition of approval for the residential development serve to support the special benefits received by residential properties. Because these properties support the provision of special benefits rather than receiving special benefits, they are also not assessed.

ZONE 3 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT
Unlike Zones 1 and 2, Zone 3 contains a mix of residential, commercial, industrial and retail land uses. In order to apportion costs proportional to benefit, the method of apportionment (spread) for Zone 3 utilizes both an ESD unit component and an acreage component.

The benefits provided by the Class I bike path, three‐rail fencing, street lights, traffic signal, and the detention pond and right of way maintenance along Highway 29 are apportioned by acreage because the size of the property provides a reasonable measure of the number trips (vehicular and bicycle), length of fencing and runoff detained. Therefore the cost of operating and maintaining these facilities is apportioned to the benefitting property based on its acreage.

The benefits provided by the streetscape, large and small parks are apportioned by ESD unit, as is done in the other two zones. These items provide benefit to and are accessible to resident families and employees of local businesses to enjoy during lunch breaks or after work hours. Non‐residential land uses are converted to residential land uses using a square footage in order to maintain equality between the average size residential unit in the zone and the nonresidential units.

The following benefit units were established for the American Canyon Landscaping and Lighting Assessment Zone 3 (Napa Junction) at the time it was annexed to the Assessment District and these reflect the relative benefit accruing the various parcels of land within the zone:
124
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25

19 ESD units for Zone 3 are determined annually based on the development pattern. The operational and maintenance expenses for the upcoming fiscal year for the streetscape, large park and small park facilities are then divided by the total number of ESD units in order to calculate the annual cost per ESD unit for the upcoming fiscal year.

Acreage units within Zone 3 are also determined annually based on development. The operational and maintenance expenses for the upcoming fiscal year for Class I bike path, three‐rail fencing, street lights, traffic signal, and the detention pond and right of way maintenance along Highway 29 are then divided by the total acreage units in order to calculate the annual cost per acreage unit for the upcoming fiscal year. The annual assessment for each parcel is calculated by:

1. Multiplying the number of ESD units on the parcel by the annual cost per ESD unit to arrive at the ESD assessment for the parcel

2. Multiplying the acreage of the parcel by the annual cost per acreage unit to arrive at the acreage assessment; and

3. Adding the ESD assessment to the acreage assessment to arrive at the total assessment for the parcel.

The allocation formula for Zone 3 can be expressed mathematically as:

Cost per ESD Unit = Fiscal Year Budget for ESD Unit Items in Zone / Total ESD Units in Zone Cost per Acre = Fiscal Year Budget for Acreage Items in Zone / Total Acreage in Zone Assessment per Parcel = (Cost per ESD x No. of ESD Units on Parcel) + (Cost per Acre x No. of Acres on Parcel) Although Section 22663 of the Streets and Highways Code typically requires that public property not be assessed, Article XIII, Section 4(a) of Proposition 218 requires that public property shall not be exempt from assessment if the property benefits from the facilities being maintained.

Zone 3 includes publicly owned property which is utilized for parks, creeks, open spaces, public rights‐of‐way and easements. These properties serve to provide landscape, open space and recreational benefits to the adjoining property.

Because these properties provide special benefits rather than receive special benefits they do not receive an annual assessment.

Land Use Description Total ESD's
SingleFamily Dwelling (SFD) 1/Unit
Condominium 1/Unit
Multiple Family Residential 1/Unit
Mobile Home 1/Unit
Commercial 1/1,500 sf floor space*
Commercial with Dwelling Unit -
Includes Hotel
1/1,500 sf floor space +
1/Unit
All Land Use Types Acres
125
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25

20 APPENDIX A – DISTRICT DIAGRAMS
The following pages include the Assessment Diagrams for Zones 1, 2 and 3 within the Assessment District. Please note the lines and dimensions of each parcel, as well as the distinctive Assessor's Parcel Number, are shown on the Assessor's Maps for the City of American Canyon available at the County of Napa Assessor's Office. The reference to the appropriate Assessor Books at the County of Napa Assessor's Office for the respective subdivisions in each Zone are listed below.

ZONE 1 - LA VIGNE
All the land lying within the La Vigne Unit 1 Subdivision filed in the Recorder's office of the County of Napa in Book 22 of Recorded Maps, Pages 42 through 57.

All the land lying within the La Vigne Unit 2 Subdivision filed in the Recorder’s office of the County of Napa in Book 22 of Recorded Maps, Pages 82 through 97.

ZONE 2 - VINTAGE RANCH
All the land within the Scally Ranch Unit 1 Subdivision filed in the Recorder's office of the County of Napa in Book 24 of Recorded Maps, Pages 1 through 22.

All the land within the Amended Scally Ranch Unit 1 Subdivision filed in the Recorder's office of the County of Napa in Book 24 of Recorded Maps, Pages 36 through 57.

All of the land within the Vintage Ranch Unit 2 Subdivision filed in the Recorder’s office of the County of Napa in Book 25 of Recorded Maps, Pages 35 through 51.

All of the land within the Vintage Ranch Unit 3 Subdivision filed in the Recorder’s office of the County of Napa in Book 25 of Recorded Maps, Pages 52 through 57.

Vineyard Crossing and Vineyard Place parcels were de-annexed from Zone 2 by City Council Resolution No. 2011-37.

The Villages at Vintage Ranch were annexed in the Zone in FY 2020-21 by City Council Resolution No. 2020-68.

ZONE 3 - NAPA JUNCTION MIXED USE PROJECT
All the land within the Napa Junction Phase 1 Subdivision filed in the Recorder's office of the County of Napa in Book 24 of Recorded Maps, Pages 81 through 87.

All the land within the Amended Napa Junction Phase 1 Subdivision filed in the Recorder’s office of the County of Napa in Book 25, Pages 5 through 11.
126
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25
21 127
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25
22 128
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25
23 129
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25
24 APPENDIX B – ASSESSMENT ROLL
Assessment Roll
The Assessment Roll for FY 2024-25 for the American Canyon Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District are listed on the following pages. The annual assessment for each parcel within Zones 1, 2 and 3 of the Assessment District are shown individually. The lines and dimensions of each parcel are shown on the Assessor's Maps for the City of American Canyon available at the County of Napa Assessor's Office.
130
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25
25131
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25
26132
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25
27133
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25
28134
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25
29135
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25
30136
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25
31137
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25
32138
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25
33139
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25
34140
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25
35141
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25
36142
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25
37143
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25
38144
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25
39145
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25
40146
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25
41147
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25
42148
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25
43149
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25
44150
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25
45 ZONE
ASMT
NO. APN
USE

CODE ACRES
ESD
UNITS
Rate per
ESD
2023-24

ASSESSMENT PROPERTY ADDRESS
2 473 59373003000 111 0.15 1.00 $319.36 $319.36 215 CANTADA WAY 2 474 59373004000 111 0.18 1.00 $319.36 $319.36 211 CANTADA WAY 2 475 59373005000 80 0.02 - $319.36 $0.00
2 476 59374001000 111 0.19 1.00 $319.36 $319.36 202 CANTADA WAY 2 477 59374002000 111 0.24 1.00 $319.36 $319.36 206 CANTADA WAY 2 478 59374003000 111 0.19 1.00 $319.36 $319.36 210 CANTADA WAY 2 479 59374004000 111 0.17 1.00 $319.36 $319.36 214 CANTADA WAY 2 480 59374005000 111 0.17 1.00 $319.36 $319.36 218 CANTADA WAY 2 481 59374006000 111E 0.17 1.00 $319.36 $319.36 211 SORRENTO LN 2 482 59374007000 111E 0.17 1.00 $319.36 $319.36 207 SORRENTO LN 2 483 59374008000 111E 0.2 1.00 $319.36 $319.36 203 SORRENTO LN 2 484 59374009000 80 0.03 - $319.36 $0.00
2 485 59375001000 111 0.17 1.00 $319.36 $319.36 178 GOLD VALLEY WA 2 486 59375002000 111E 0.15 1.00 $319.36 $319.36 174 GOLD VALLEY WA 2 487 59375003000 111E 0.15 1.00 $319.36 $319.36 170 GOLD VALLEY WA 2 488 59375004000 111 0.15 1.00 $319.36 $319.36 166 GOLD VALLEY WA 2 489 59381001000 111 0.15 1.00 $319.36 $319.36 22 SELVINO CT 2 490 59381002000 111 0.15 1.00 $319.36 $319.36 18 SELVINO CT 2 491 59381003000 111E 0.17 1.00 $319.36 $319.36 14 SELVINO CT 2 492 59381004000 111 0.15 1.00 $319.36 $319.36 10 SELVINO CT 2 493 59381005000 111 0.18 1.00 $319.36 $319.36 6 SELVINO CT 2 494 59382001000 80 1.09 - $319.36 $0.00
2 495 59383001000 111 0.11 1.00 $319.36 $319.36 151 HORIZON WAY 2 496 59383002000 111 0.12 1.00 $319.36 $319.36 147 HORIZON WAY 2 497 59383003000 111 0.12 1.00 $319.36 $319.36 143 HORIZON WAY 2 498 59383004000 111 0.15 1.00 $319.36 $319.36 139 HORIZON WAY 2 499 59383005000 111 0.13 1.00 $319.36 $319.36 135 HORIZON WAY 2 500 59383006000 111 0.16 1.00 $319.36 $319.36 131 HORIZON WAY 2 501 59383007000 111 0 1.00 $319.36 $319.36 127 HORIZON WAY 2 502 59383008000 111 0.16 1.00 $319.36 $319.36 123 HORIZON WAY 2 503 59383009000 111E 0.13 1.00 $319.36 $319.36 119 HORIZON WAY 2 504 59383010000 111 0.16 1.00 $319.36 $319.36 115 HORIZON WAY 2 505 59383011000 111 0.14 1.00 $319.36 $319.36 111 HORIZON WAY 2 506 59383012000 111 0.16 1.00 $319.36 $319.36 107 HORIZON WAY 2 507 59383013000 111 0.14 1.00 $319.36 $319.36 103 HORIZON WAY 2 508 59384001000 111E 0.16 1.00 $319.36 $319.36 23 HORIZON CT 2 509 59384002000 111E 0.16 1.00 $319.36 $319.36 19 HORIZON CT 2 510 59384003000 111 0.14 1.00 $319.36 $319.36 15 HORIZON CT 2 511 59384004000 111E 0.13 1.00 $319.36 $319.36 11 HORIZON CT 2 512 59384005000 111 0.16 1.00 $319.36 $319.36 7 HORIZON CT 2 513 59385001000 111 0.16 1.00 $319.36 $319.36 134 HORIZON WAY 2 514 59385002000 111 0.13 1.00 $319.36 $319.36 130 HORIZON WAY 2 515 59385003000 111 0 1.00 $319.36 $319.36 126 HORIZON WAY 2 516 59385004000 111 0.14 1.00 $319.36 $319.36 122 HORIZON WAY 2 517 59385005000 111 0.13 1.00 $319.36 $319.36 118 HORIZON WAY 2 518 59385006000 111E 0.14 1.00 $319.36 $319.36 114 HORIZON WAY 2 519 59385007000 111 0.16 1.00 $319.36 $319.36 110 HORIZON WAY 151
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25
46152
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25
47153
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25
48154
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25
49155
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25
50156
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25
51157
Engineer’s Report
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
City of American Canyon
Fiscal Year 2024-25
52 ZONE
ASMT
NO. APN
USE

CODE ESD ACRES
FLOOR

SPACE SF
ESD
FACTOR

ACREAGE
FACTOR
2024-25

ASSESSMENT PROPERTY ADDRESS
3 13 59020045000 50 0 3.99 0 $219.18 $1,079.22 $0.00 OPEN SPACE 3 14 59020051000 50 12.53 2.79 18,795 $219.18 $1,079.22 $5,757.36 418 NAPA JUNCTION Tractor Supply Co. - Retail 3 14 59020052000 50 1.00 1.14 1,500 $219.18 $1,079.22 $1,449.50 418 NAPA JUNCTION Tractor Supply Co. - Parking lot 3 15 59020047000 50 4.66 1.01 6,990 $219.18 $1,079.22 $2,111.40 406 NAPA JUNCTION Verizon 3 16 59020048000 50 1.33 1.00 1,995 $219.18 $1,079.22 $1,370.74 408 NAPA JUNCTION Taco Bell 3 17 59020049000 50 4.56 1.08 6,840 $219.18 $1,079.22 $2,165.02 410 NAPA JUNCTION DD, Mt. Mikes, etc. 3 18 59020050000 50 151.40 5.97 5,100 $219.18 $1,079.22 $39,626.80 440 NAPA JUNCTION Apts. & Clubhouse - 148 units 3 1 59351007000 80 0 0.26 0 $219.18 $1,079.22 $0.00
3 2 59351008000 80 0 1.01 0 $219.18 $1,079.22 $0.00
3 3 59351010000 51 113.17 13.96 169,755 $219.18 $1,079.22 $39,870.52 7011 MAIN ST Walmart 3 4 59351011000 81 0 2.81 0 $219.18 $1,079.22 $0.00 MAIN STREET PARK 3 5 59351012000 218 216.00 10.00 0 $219.18 $1,079.22 $58,135.08 5500 EUCALYPTUS DR Lodge Apts - 216 units 3 6 59351013000 51 2.09 0.86 3,135 $219.18 $1,079.22 $1,386.22 401 NAPA JUNCTION Gas Station 3 7 59351014000 51 4.53 0.79 6,795 $219.18 $1,079.22 $1,845.48 7021 MAIN ST Retail Stores 3 8 59351015000 51 1.09 1.19 1,635 $219.18 $1,079.22 $1,523.18 6055 MAIN ST Sonic Drive-In 3 9 59351016000 51 7.47 1.41 11,205 $219.18 $1,079.22 $3,158.98 6040 MAIN ST #142 Coldwell Bank 3 10 59352001000 51 12.83 2.36 19,245 $219.18 $1,079.22 $5,359.04 5055 MAIN ST #100 Panda Expess, Round Table, Bank 3 11 59352002000 513 38.26 2.48 16,890 $219.18 $1,079.22 $11,062.30 5001 MAIN ST Holiday Inn Express 570.92 46.04 $174,821.62
Asmt No.12 (now deleted), former APN 59020001000, was subdivided into six new parcel numbers at the time of the filing of the FY 2106-17 Engineer's Report.

The new APN's are shown above (059-020-045 through 059-020-050) and will be assessed according to the established rate and Method of Apportionment described in the Engineer's Report and as adopted by City Council Resolution No. 2016-57.

Assessment No. 14, former APN 059-020-046, was subdivided into parcels 051 and 052 for the 2017/18 levy.

ESD for each parcel is determined by dividing the commercial floor space SF by 1,500 (minimum 1,500) and adding any residential units 158

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
MAY 7, 2024

STAFF REPORT

BUSINESS
ITEM NUMBER: 17.

TITLE
Traffic Calming Program

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a Resolu)on of the City Council of the City of American Canyon approving the 2024 City of American Canyon Traffic Calming Program Update.

CONTACT
Erica Ahmann Smithies, P.E., Public Works Director

BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS
The goal of the 2024 Traffic Calming Program Update is to improve neighborhood livability by reducing the impact of traffic to promote safe neighborhoods and pleasant condi)ons for all street users.

The current Program - adopted in 2011 - is outdated. The process is complex, requires significant staff )me (as well as members of the community), results in long project delivery )melines, and relies upon outdated metrics.

Since February 2023, staff has been working with traffic engineering consultant, Fehr and Peers, to evaluate the Program. This 2024 update includes collabora)on across several Departments:

Community Development, Police, Fire and Public Works.

Prospec)vely the Program will remain a resident-driven, pe))on-based program and address traffic concerns on local (residen)al) and collector streets in American Canyon that have not already been iden)fied in other local transporta)on ini)a)ves such as the: 2023 NVTA Vision Zero Plan, 2022 Local Roadway Safety Plan, and the 2022 Berkeley SafeTREC Complete Streets Safety Assessment.

The intent of the Program is to:

Ar)culate a process for the program that is efficient, transparent, easily understandable, and predictable;
Be reliant on a data-driven process to treat neighborhood traffic-related issues in the City; Require that residents along a street demonstrate community support for traffic calming on their street;
159
Reflect a realistic availability of staff time to execute the program; Create a Traffic Calming Toolbox that includes types of traffic calming measures most effec)ve at addressing the documented traffic-safety issue by roadway type; Achieve a balance between the amount of funding per year that may be available for traffic calming, demand for traffic calming from the community, and the amount of traffic calming measures that can be realistically designed and implemented in any given year; and Is aligned with other local transportation plans
The Program describes the new pe))on process as well as informa)on for residents who would like to learn more about the Program and apply for traffic calming measures on their street. The Program includes an updated flowchart and describes the steps in applica)on, data collec)on, the traffic calming toolbox, traffic calming project approvals and funding requests.

COUNCIL PRIORITY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS
Public Safety: "Ensure American Canyon remains a safe community."

FISCAL IMPACT
Approving the Program will have no impact to the FY 23/24 Budget. All pe))on-based projects will need to be reviewed by City staff and presented to City Council on an annual basis prior to moving forward with plan development, plan support and ul)mately developing a budget for implementation.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Adop)on of a traffic calming program is not a project as defined in Sec)on 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act guidelines. However, individual projects that alter the environment (such as construc)ng curb extensions) would be subject to environmental review, which would occur during the project development process.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution - Traffic Calming Program

2. Exhibit A -Traffic Calming Report

3. Presentation
160
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-______
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON APPROVING THE 2024 CITY

OF AMERICAN CANYON TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM
WHEREAS, on November 1, 2011, the American Canyon City Council adopted Resolution No. 2011-101 adopting the 2011 American Canyon Traffic Calming Program; WHEREAS, the City remains committed to improving neighborhood livability by reducing the impact of traffic to promote safe neighborhoods and pleasant conditions for all street users through the implementation of a traffic calming program; and
WHEREAS, the need for an updated Traffic Calming Program (Program) came as a result of feedback the community provided; and
WHEREAS, the 2024 Program will remain a resident-driven, petition-based program that addresses traffic concerns on local (residential) and collector streets in American Canyon that have not already been identified and prioritized in other local transportation initiatives such as the 2023 NVTA Vision Zero Plan, 2022 Local Roadway Safety Plan, and the 2022 Berkeley SafeTREC Complete Streets Safety Assessment; and
WHEREAS, the information provided in the updated Program describes a new petition process as well as information for residents who would like to learn more about the Program and apply for traffic calming measures on their street; and
WHEREAS, the new Program includes an updated flowchart and describes the steps in application, data collection, the traffic calming toolbox, traffic calming project approvals and funding requests.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of American Canyon City Council hereby rescinds Resolution No. 2011-101 adopting the 2011 American Canyon Traffic Calming Program and supersedes all prior resolutions, policies, and related exhibits previously adopted by City Council.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of American Canyon City Council hereby adopts the 2024 City of American Canyon Traffic Calming Program and supersedes all prior resolutions, policies, and related exhibits previously adopted by City Council.

PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council of the City of American Canyon held on the 7th day of May, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
________________________________
Leon Garcia, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
161
______________________________ ______________________________ Taresa Geilfuss, CMC, City Clerk William D. Ross, City Attorney Attachments:

Exhibit A – 2024 City of American Canyon Traffic Calming Program 162
Final Report
City of American
Canyon – Traffic
Calming Program
MARCH 2024 |
163
FINAL
City of American
Canyon — Traffic
Calming Program
Prepared for:

City of American Canyon
March 2024
WC23-3975
164
Table of Contents
Introduction................................................................................................................................... 1 TCP Program Structure ..............................................................................................................................................................1 Application Guidelines ...............................................................................................................................................................8 Traffic Calming Toolbox ..........................................................................................................................................................15 Non-Physical Devices.......................................................................................................................................................16 Targeted Speed Enforcement.......................................................................................................................................16 Speed Feedback Sign.......................................................................................................................................................17 Centerline/Edgeline Lane Striping ..............................................................................................................................18 Signage..................................................................................................................................................................................19 Education ..............................................................................................................................................................................20 Speed Control – Vertical Devices ................................................................................................................................21 Speed Lump.........................................................................................................................................................................21 Speed Table .........................................................................................................................................................................22 Raised Crosswalk................................................................................................................................................................23 Speed Control – Horizontal Devices ..........................................................................................................................24 Traffic Circle .........................................................................................................................................................................24 Roundabout (Single Lane)..............................................................................................................................................25 Medians with Horizonal Deflection ............................................................................................................................26 Slow Turn Wedges ............................................................................................................................................................27 Hardened Centerlines/Rubber Speed Bumps ........................................................................................................28 Speed Control – Vertical Devices ................................................................................................................................29 Bulb-out/Curb Extension ................................................................................................................................................29 Two-Lane Choker...............................................................................................................................................................30 Street Trees ..........................................................................................................................................................................31 Median Without Horizontal Deflection/Pedestrian Refuge Island.................................................................32 Volume Control Devices..................................................................................................................................................33 Full Closure...........................................................................................................................................................................33 Half Closure..........................................................................................................................................................................34 Diagonal Diverter...............................................................................................................................................................35 Forced-Turn Island ............................................................................................................................................................36 165
List of Figures
Figure 1: Traffic Calming Program Flowchart............................................................................................................................6 List of Tables
Table 1: Traffic Calming Program Process.................................................................................................................................2 Table 2: Safety Measures by Traffic-Related Concerns ........................................................................................................9 Table 3: Applicability of Devices by Location Type............................................................................................................. 11 Table 4: Applicability of Devices by Street Type.................................................................................................................. 13 166
City of American Canyon — Traffic Calming Program
March 2024
1 Introduction
Fehr & Peers staff met with City staff on March 28, 2023, to discuss ways in which the City’s existing Traffic Calming Program (TCP) is working well, and ways in which it can be improved. We reviewed options to identify how the City would like to structure the program, and we prepared this memo and corresponding flow chart of the proposed new TCP process and menu of applicable devices that can be installed based on the problem and street-type.

TCP Program Structure
The flowchart below identifies the steps the City would take when a request is made by a resident. The text accompanies the program process flowchart shown in Figure 1. The colors correspond to components in the flowchart, and the letters in bold correspond to individual steps in the flowchart.

Where the color is darker and text is italicized for a step, an Existing Safety Program should be reviewed to identify if a request has been previously highlighted by a plan or program.

The process is separated into four key components focused on developing a strategy to address requests and manage City resources. The four components of the process are: plan initiation, development, support, and implementation. Each of these components are discussed in greater detail in Table 1. 167
City of American Canyon — Traffic Calming Program
March 2024
2 Table 1: Traffic Calming Program Process
Step 1. Plan Initiation
The first component of the process is the plan initiation. This component describes how the traffic calming process is initiated and how requests are handled and considered for treatment. Letters in bold correspond to individual steps in the plan initiation component.

A
The process is initiated when a resident or group of residents express interest in addressing speeding, traffic volumes, or traffic-related safety issues within their neighborhood and submits the Traffic Concern Form on the City’s website.

B
The requester(s) completes the petition which requires the signatures of at least 30% of the households on the subject street, indicating they perceive a significant problem. If the street contains fewer than 10 households, signatures from a minimum of three households are required.

If the minimum number of signatures cannot be obtained, then the process does not continue due to a lack of support for action.

Requests from an institution may be exempt from the petition process. For example, a school may request City action to treat a perceived speeding issue. Staff then assesses the issue and bypasses the minimum required signatures.

C
A completed petition with the required number of signatures is submitted to the City’s Department of Public Works. City staff, at the direction of the Public Works Director, reviews the petition and defines the appropriate boundaries for the study area. The affected area should include all streets that might be treated or affected by potential actions. Traffic calming treatments may be applied to multiple streets within the study area.

D
A submitted petition is placed in a queue of neighborhood requests to be selected on a first come, first served basis. However, the queue serves only to initiate the process and does not indicate a priority in project approval, funding, or implementation.

If a concern is on a street or corridor that was previously identified as a priority in a Safety Program, the concern is given a priority in the queue.

E
Staff identifies the number of requested areas in the queue that can be addressed in a given year based upon budget and staff resources. This typically occurs on a first-come, first-served basis. However, City Council can also supplement the available funding and direct staff regarding priorities.

F
City Council annually reviews the areas identified being treated in that year. Areas in the queue will remain in first-come, first-served list for future fiscal years. 168
City of American Canyon — Traffic Calming Program
March 2024
3 Step 2. Plan Development
The plan development component begins after the study areas have been selected for treatment. This section describes how the residents, City staff, the Police Chief, the Fire Chief, and other affected agencies work together to develop a plan to treat traffic calming related issues.

A
City staff notifies all study area residents/property owners and business owners about the selection of their neighborhood area to participate in the traffic calming plan. Following the notice, a neighborhood planning meeting will be held. The meeting is intended for staff to provide an overview of the process.

City staff will also provide any relevant data and discuss the menu of treatment options.

B
City staff collects traffic data on the identified streets, such as: traffic speeds, traffic volumes, and available collision history for the previous years. Staff will review traffic data within the study area and develop a strategy to address the concerns. Data regarding the traffic-related concerns will be compared to the traffic calming device guidelines to determine which measures may be most appropriate.

C
Staff will develop a draft plan within the constraints of the device guidelines. This draft plan will be shared with the community for feedback/input. The plan will consider non-physical measures (e.g., lane striping, signage, speed legends) and physical measures (see Traffic Calming Toolbox for more information).

Physical measures increase the cost of implementation and may result in new issues (i.e., traffic diversion onto another street). Due to land use context and speeds along collectors and arterials, countermeasures will be more limited than those available on local roads.

If any conceptual plans or treatments were previously identified in a Safety Program, include them in the draft plan.

D
City staff will solicit feedback from other departments and agencies that may be potentially affected by physical measures. The intent of this process is to identify concerns and potential modifications to the plan. The following agencies will likely be involved in reviewing most plans:
• Fire Department
• Police Department
• Transit Agencies
• Local School District
169
City of American Canyon — Traffic Calming Program
March 2024
4 Step 3. Plan Support
The plan support component begins after the draft plan has been vetted in the community and with agency staff. This section describes how engagement for neighborhood support will be completed.

A
Once staff have developed a plan they feel appropriately addresses the traffic-related issues, a final neighborhood meeting will be arranged to present the proposed traffic calming plan. Residents will also be informed of the approval process and surveys they will receive subsequent to the meeting.

B
The level of neighborhood support for the proposed plan will be determined in the form of mail-in surveys. Staff will mail the surveys to neighborhood area residents/property owners and business owners.

Surveys will be distributed to all tenants of record, owners (single and multi-family), and businesses addresses within the study area. The surveys will include a description and map of the proposed plan indicating the type and location of device(s) being proposed. The survey will also include a mail back postcard which will be used to determine public support by clearly asking:
• Do you support the proposed plan? Yes or No.

The mail back postcard will also provide a space for residents to write comments regarding the proposed plan. Survey information should be provided in multiple languages, when needed, consistent with current City policy. This survey shall also be limited to one response per household or business.

C
A minimum response rate and support rate must be met from individuals in the study area before the plan moves forward. For implementation of a plan, a minimum of 30% of residents or business owners must respond, and 66% of residents or business owners/managers must be in favor.

City staff counts all received surveys and discusses the outcome internally and with the residents.

If recommendations from a previous Safety Program are included as part of the Plan, lower the neighborhood support approval rate to 15%.

D
Staff determines whether the minimum response and support rate are satisfied.

If the minimum support rate is not achieved, and staff believes they can enhance the plan to increase support, they will have one opportunity to revise the plan. Modifying the plan also requires consulting the affected agencies of any meaningful changes, holding a public meeting to present the revised plan, and redistributing surveys to the study area.

If the minimum response rate and support rate are met, then the plan continues to the implementation step.
170
City of American Canyon — Traffic Calming Program
March 2024
5 Step 4. Plan Implementation
The final component of the traffic calming process is implementation.

A
City Council is asked to approve the plan. If Council does not approve, then the plan can return to Plan Development (Step C) at the direction of Council.

B
The costs of the plan’s implementation will be categorized into three buckets: strategic planning, opportunistic, or discretionary. See the Safety Program Matrix for further details.

If a project is previously identified in a Safety Program, staff can look to federal, state, regional, and local funding sources for implementation funding. This structure builds upon the Safety Programs the city has created, and allows for an equitable distribution of funding and staff resources to support concerns identified by the American Canyon community.

C
The traffic calming devices can be constructed either as temporary or permanent devices. Temporary devices can be constructed at staff’s discretion based on previous experience with the device. These temporary devices can be converted to permanent devices after three months of acceptable performance.

D
After construction of the approved plan, staff monitors the devices1 and collects data three months after implementation, along with feedback from the community. The feedback will typically be requested via a neighborhood meeting, but it could be via an online survey at staff’s discretion.

Typical data collection will include speed, volume, origin/destination, and collisions.

E
Based on community feedback and collected data, staff determine the next steps. For example, the approved plan may have produced reasonable and satisfactory results and therefore no further action is needed.

F
If the approved plan has not produced reasonable and satisfactory results, staff will return to plan development and modify the plan.

The plan can be revised once, dependent on funding availability. This includes the removal of devices found to be ineffective. Removal of devices would follow the same support steps as described in this chapter (beginning with Step A of the Plan Support component).

Source: Fehr & Peers, 2023.
1 Staff may make immediate changes if they conclude a device is unsafe. 171
Consider lowering the threshold
for response rate to 25% and
approval rate to 50% if the
street/corridor is identified as a
priority in a Safety Program

1. Plan Initiation 2. Plan Development 3. Plan Support 4. Plan Implementation Resident Request:

Resident or group expresses interest
and submits Traffic Concern Form.

Resident Support:

Petition received with signatures
from at least 30% of households on
subject street (minimum of three
households).

City Review:

Staff review petitions and define
study area boundaries.

First-Come, First-Served:

Petition is places in queue of
neighborhood requests to be selected
on a first-come, first-served basis.1 4

1. The first-come, first-served queue serves only to initiate the process and does not indicate a priority in project approval, funding, or implementation

2. Surveys distributed within study area and is limited to one signature per household or business

3. Process for removal of devices would begin at Plan Support (Step A)

4. Consider means to have equity balance in resource allocation Staff identifies the Number of Areas
that can be addressed in a given year
upon budget and staff resources. All
requesting parties are notified of their
status.

Annual Review
by Council
Notice to Neighborhood:

Residents & business owners notified of
intent to develop a plan.

Neighborhood Meeting:
• Overview of process
• Review of issues
• Identify data collection needs
Plan Development:

Staff or a committee with staff
support will develop a draft plan
Affected Agency Input:

Solicit feedback from other
departments an agencies and local
service providers:
• Fire Department
• Police Department
• Transit Agencies
• Local School District
Neighborhood Meeting:
• Review draft plan & gather feedback
• Refine plan as appropriate
Distribute Neighborhood Survey2:
• Residents
• Property Owners
• Business owners
Survey will include a mail back postcard
in multiple languages, if needed.

Minimum Neighborhood Support:

Response rate: 30%
Approval Rate: 66%
Neighborhood
Support?
No Yes
Refine plan (once)
Approval:

City Council is asked to approve plan
If plan is not approved, return to Plan
Development (Step C) at Council discretion.

Funding & Design:

Identify cost for implementation and funding
source. Next, engineering design is prepared,
and environmental review, if necessary. Staff
will notify the public and affected agencies
regarding device implementation.

Construction:

Temporary or permanent devices installed.

Monitoring:

City staff collect data three months after
implementation. Hard data collection will
occur on a case-by-case basis.

City Staff Determine
Next Steps Based on
Community Feedback
Leave Plan As-Is
Return to Plan
Development
and modify plan
(once), including
potential removal
of Devices
3 A
B
C
D
E
F
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
E
F
Figure 1: Traffic Calming Program Template
Darker Boxes Indicate Linkage to Safety Programs
If concern is on street/corridor
previously identified as a priority in a
Safety Program, give priority in queue
D-1
Include treatments previously
identified through a Safety
Program into the plan
C-1
C-1
Look to Safety Program for funding
sources for potential applications to
traffic calming treatments. See attached
matrix.

B-1
172
Safety Program Matrix

C U R R E N T

F U N D I N G S O U R C E S
Opportunistic Projects that can be folded into
existing funding mechanisms and
work plans
• Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
• Measure T Funding
• Developer Fees
• Capital Improvement Projects
• Reconstruction and Widening Projects
• NVTA Joint Powers Authority Projects
Strategic
Planning
Projects that focus on preventing
fatal and severe crashes through
systemic safety efforts based on
historical crash history
• Safe Streets for All (SS4A)
• Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
• Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
Program
• Rebuilding American Infrastructure with
Sustainability and Equity (RAISE) Discretionary
Grant Program
• Active Transportation Program (ATP)
• California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) Grant
Program
• NVTA Bike Plan
• NVTA Ped Plan
• NVTA Vision Zero
• Local Road Safety Plan
• Complete Streets Safety Assessment
• Safe Routes to School Reports
• Engineering and Traffic Survey
Discretionary
Projects that do not fall into the
other categories and can use the
annual set aside funding for
Traffic Calming
• Annual Council Funding

C A T E G O R Y D E S C R I P T I O N R E L A T I O N T O E X I S T I N G

P L A N S / P R O G R A M S
• Calming Community Form
173
City of American Canyon — Traffic Calming Program
March 2024
8 Application Guidelines
When selecting the most appropriate traffic calming devices, the types of measures should be narrowed to those that: most closely target the key traffic issue, are appropriate for the surrounding uses of the identified location, are cost effective, and are compatible with traffic volumes, geometrics, and adjacent land uses.

City staff and the Traffic Working Group will evaluate the most appropriate devices based on effectiveness and context of the facility being evaluated.

Step 1:

Address the Traffic-Related
Concern
The first task when selecting the most
appropriate traffic calming device is
to narrow the field of considered
devices to those that address the
primary traffic concern. The most
common traffic-related concerns are:
• Speeding – motor vehicle speeds
are too high
• Traffic volumes – motor vehicle
usage levels (all trips or nonlocal trips) are too high • Safety – motor vehicle speeds or
volumes create a safety concern
Each device in the toolbox is
appropriate to a different subset of
the above traffic-related concerns.

The appropriateness of each device
(which accounts for how effective a
service is in that context) is
summarized in Table 2.

Step 2:

Address the Location Type
The appropriate device for a given
problem is also a function of the
location. Special consideration should
be given when considering measures
located on primary streets used by
the Fire Department when responding
to emergencies.

Table 3 indicates the location(s)
where each type of traffic calming
measure is applicable.

Step 3:

Address Other Constraints by
Street Type
The third step in determining the
most appropriate device is to
consider how each device is
compatible with the street
classification, street grade, traffic
volumes, posted speeds, and special
roadway users. Table 4 illustrates
where each device is appropriate
under certain conditions.

In general, roadway width is not a
constraint for implementing physical
measures. Speed lumps, speed tables,
and raised crosswalks can be
constructed across any reasonable
roadway width. Traffic circles need to
be sized relative to the space
available but can typically be
accommodated at any intersection.
174
City of American Canyon — Traffic Calming Program
March 2024
9 Table 2: Safety Measures by Traffic-Related Concerns
Types of Measures
Types of Traffic-Related Concerns
Speeding Traffic Volumes* Collisions
Non-Physical Measures
Targeted Speed Enforcement
Speed Feedback Sign
Centerline/Edgeline Lane Striping
Signage
Education
Speed Control – Vertical Measures
Speed Lump
Speed Table
Raised Crosswalk
Speed Control – Horizontal Measures
Traffic Circle
Roundabout (Single Lane)
Median with Horizontal Deflection
Slow Turn Wedges**
Hardened Centerlines/Rubber Speed Bumps**
Speed Control – Narrowing Measures
Bulb-Out/Curb Extension
Two-Lane Choker
Median without Horizontal Deflection/Pedestrian Refuge Island Street Trees
* Depends largely on availability of alternate routes
** More info available at: https://www1.nyc.gov/html/dot/html/pedestrians/turn-calming.shtml; https://www1.nyc.gov/html/dot/downloads/pdf/left-turn-pedestrian-and-bicycle-crashstudy.pdf Strongly Appropriate Moderately Appropriate Inappropriate 175 City of American Canyon — Traffic Calming Program
March 2024
10 Types of Measures
Types of Traffic-Related Concerns
Speeding Traffic Volumes* Collisions
Volume Control Measures
Full Closure
Half Closure
Diagonal Diverter
Forced-Turn Island
Strongly Appropriate Moderately Appropriate Inappropriate * Depends largely on availability of alternate routes
** More info available at: https://www1.nyc.gov/html/dot/html/pedestrians/turn-calming.shtml; https://www1.nyc.gov/html/dot/downloads/pdf/left-turn-pedestrian-and-bicycle-crashstudy.pdf 176
City of American Canyon — Traffic Calming Program
March 2024
11 Table 3: Applicability of Devices by Location Type
Types of Measures
Local Streets Collectors* Arterials
Mid-block Intersection Mid-block Intersection Mid-block Intersection Non-Physical Measures
Targeted Speed Enforcement
Speed Feedback Sign
Centerline/Edgeline Lane Striping
Signage
Education
Speed Control – Vertical Measures**
Speed Lump
Speed Table
Raised Crosswalk
Speed Control – Horizontal Measures
Traffic Circle
Roundabout (Single Lane)
Median with Horizontal Deflection
Slow Turn Wedges
Hardened Centerlines/Rubber Speed Bumps
Speed Control – Narrowing Measures
Bulb-Out/Curb Extension
Two-Lane Choker
Median without Horizontal Deflection/Pedestrian Refuge Island Street Trees
* Due to emergency response concerns
** Vertical measures may affect emergency response times. City staff and the Traffic Working Group will implement safety measures based on effectiveness and context of the facility being evaluated
Strongly Appropriate Moderately Appropriate Inappropriate 177 City of American Canyon — Traffic Calming Program
March 2024
12 Types of Measures
Local Streets Collectors* Arterials
Mid-block Intersection Mid-block Intersection Mid-block Intersection Volume Control Measures
Full Closure
Half Closure
Diagonal Diverter
Forced-Turn Island
* Due to emergency response concerns
** Vertical measures may affect emergency response times. City staff and the Traffic Working Group will implement safety measures based on effectiveness and context of the facility being evaluated
Strongly Appropriate Moderately Appropriate Inappropriate 178
City of American Canyon — Traffic Calming Program
March 2024
13 Table 4: Applicability of Devices by Street Type
Types of Measures
Street Types
Local Streets Collectors Arterials
Non-Physical Measures
Targeted Speed Enforcement
No limitations with respect to ADT or speed
Speed Feedback Sign
Centerline/Edgeline Lane Striping
Signage
Education
Speed Control – Vertical Measures
Speed Lump Speed Limit ≤ 25 MPH; Grade ≤ 8%
Speed Table Daily Entering Volume < 16,000;
Raised Crosswalk* Speed Limit ≤ 35 MPH
Speed Control – Horizontal Measures
Traffic Circle Daily Entering Volume < 10,000; Speed Limit ≤ 35 MPH Roundabout (Single Lane) Daily Entering Volumes < 16,000; Speed Limit ≤ 45 MPH Median with Horizontal Deflection
Slow Turn Wedges No limitations with respect to ADT or speed Hardened Centerlines/Rubber Speed Bumps
Speed Control – Narrowing Measures
Bulb-Out/Curb Extension
Two-Lane Choker ADT ≤ 20,000; Speed Limit ≤ 35 MPH
Median without Horizontal Deflection/Pedestrian Refuge Island Street Trees No limitations with respect to ADT or speed, but sight lines must be preserved * Not appropriate for streets without curbs, gutters, or sidewalks. 179
City of American Canyon — Traffic Calming Program
March 2024
14 Types of Measures
Street Types
Local Streets Collectors Arterials
Volume Control Measures
Full Closure
Proper evaluation should be conducted to determine amount of diverted traffic to alternate routes
Half Closure
Diagonal Diverter
Forced-Turn Island
* Not appropriate for streets without curbs, gutters, or sidewalks. 180
City of American Canyon — Traffic Calming Report
March 2024
15 Traffic Calming Toolbox
This section describes the “toolbox” of devices that are available to community members and Staff when developing a Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan. The “toolbox” contains different devices that address neighborhood traffic-related concerns such as speeding vehicles, high traffic volumes, cutthrough traffic, or safety concerns. The devices vary in their ability to treat various traffic-related concerns.

The toolbox of neighborhood traffic management devices is grouped into same three categories as noted above:

1. Non-Physical devices

2. Speed Control devices (primarily speed, but they can impact volume) i. Vertical devices
ii. Horizontal devices

3. Volume Control devices (primarily volume, but they can impact speed) For each device in the toolbox, the following discussions are provided:
• Description of the measure
• Photograph and/or schematic
• List of advantages and disadvantages
181
City of American Canyon — Traffic Calming Report
March 2024
16 Targeted Speed Enforcement
Police can perform targeted enforcement at locations where speeding is common. Depending on Police Department resources, the targeted enforcement may be limited in duration. Targeted enforcement may also be used in conjunction with new traffic calming devices to help drivers become aware of the new restrictions.

Equity considerations should be carefully considered to determine if traffic enforcement is appropriate.

Automated speed enforcement could be a potential alternative if allowed at the state and local level.

Non-Physical Devices
Non-physical devices include any measure that does not require physical changes to the roadway.

They are intended to increase drivers’ awareness of surroundings and influence driver behavior without physical devices. Because these devices are not self-enforcing, they have limited effectiveness as stand-alone devices and should supplement physical devices.

This category includes the following devices:
• Targeted Speed Enforcement • Signage
• Speed Feedback Sign • Education
• Centerline/Edgeline Lane Striping

ADVANTAGES
• Inexpensive
• Does not physically slow
emergency vehicles or buses
• Quick implementation

DISADVANTAGES
• Expensive to maintain an
increased level of enforcement
• Effectiveness may be temporary
• Equity concerns given potential
for profiling and higher impact
to lower income communities

ADVANTAGES
• Inexpensive
• Does not physically slow emergency
vehicles or buses
• Quick implementation

DISADVANTAGES
• Expensive to maintain an increased
level of enforcement
• Effectiveness may be temporary
• Equity concerns given potential for
profiling and higher impact to lower
income communities
182
City of American Canyon — Traffic Calming Report
March 2024
17 Speed Feedback Sign
Speed feedback signs measure each approaching vehicle’s speed. Real-time speeds are relayed to drivers and flash when speeds exceed the limit. Speed feedback signs are typically mounted on or near speed limit signs and are most common in school zones. Speed feedback signs are also available as portable trailers.

ADVANTAGES
• Real-time speed feedback
• Does not physically slow emergency
vehicles or buses
• Permanent installation or portable
trailer
• Provides immediate feedback
• Speed and count data can be
recorded
• Often solar powered

DISADVANTAGES
• Effectiveness may be temporary
• May require power sources or stop
working if solar power is insufficient
• Only effective for one direction of
travel
• Subject to vandalism
Source: Lakota Contracting
183
City of American Canyon — Traffic Calming Report
March 2024
18 Centerline/Edgeline Lane Striping
Lane striping can be used to create formal bicycle lanes, parking lanes, or edge lines. As a traffic management measure, they are used to narrow the travel lanes for vehicles, thereby inducing drivers to lower their speeds. However, past evidence on speed reductions is inconclusive.

ADVANTAGES
• Inexpensive
• Can be used to create bicycle lanes or
delineate on-street parking
• Does not slow emergency vehicles

DISADVANTAGES
• Has not been shown to significantly
reduce travel speeds
• Requires regular maintenance
184
City of American Canyon — Traffic Calming Report
March 2024
19 Signage
Signage that can be used as a traffic management measure include:
• Truck restriction signs
• “Cross traffic does not stop” signs
• Turn restrictions
Turn-movement restrictions involve the use of signs to prevent undesired turning movements without the use of physical devices. The restrictions may generally apply to turning movements in or out of a residential street to a larger street. The turn-movement restrictions may be permanent or only during peak commute hours.

ADVANTAGES
• Truck restrictions can reduce through
traffic
• Truck restrictions can reduce cutthrough traffic at specific time of day • Does not slow emergency vehicles or
buses
• Can increase safety at an intersection
by prohibiting certain turning
movements
• Low cost

DISADVANTAGES
• Turn restrictions require enforcement
during time of restriction to be
effective
• May divert a traffic problem to another
street
185
City of American Canyon — Traffic Calming Report
March 2024
20 Education
A variety of education strategies can be used to educate people on the safety risks associated with speeding. Changing driver behavior and attitudes will require increased public safety education. The following strategies can be employed by agencies as funding and Staff resources allow:
• Brochure – describe the Traffic Calming Program and process. • Traffic Safety newsletter (jurisdiction-wide and/or neighborhood specific) – provide information on volumes, speeds, speeding fines (particularly in school zones), and average speeds; describe traffic concerns and recommendations; provide reminders of traffic laws and traffic safety tips for all modes.
• Website – have a designated page on the agency’s website to provide information on the Traffic Calming Program and the same information recommended for the newsletter. • Speed yard signs – implement a public safety education campaign targeting safe speeds. Make yard signs available to the public for free. They should be brightly colored and include phrases like, “20 is plenty,” “Keep kids safe,” and “SLOW DOWN. Drive like you live here.” • Permanent roadside memorial signs at fatal crash locations – install signs to commemorate the lives of loved ones lost. This could include flowers, photos, handmade signs, white bikes (for locations where a bicyclist was killed), and other displays.

ADVANTAGES
• Relatively inexpensive
• Can be implemented incrementally
over time

DISADVANTAGES
• Staff time required to maintain these
resources
City of Napa
186
City of American Canyon — Traffic Calming Report
March 2024
21 Speed Lump
Speed lumps are rounded raised areas placed across the road with two-wheel cut-outs designed to allow large vehicles, such as emergency vehicles and buses, to pass with minimal slowing. The design limits passenger cars and mid-size SUVs from fully passing through the cut-outs and requires travel over the lump.

They are slightly less than four inches high, typically parabolic in shape, and have a design speed of 15 to 20 MPH. They are usually constructed with a taper on each side to allow unimpeded drainage between the lump and curb. When placed on a street with rolled curbs or no curbs, bollards are placed at the ends of the speed lump to discourage vehicles from veering outside of the travel lane to avoid the device. A series of speed lumps are often needed to retain slower speeds over a longer distance.

Speed Control – Vertical Devices
Vertical deflection devices use variations in pavement height and alternative paving materials to physically reduce travel speeds. These devices are designed for travel speeds over the device of approximately 15 to 20 MPH depending on the device.

The vertical deflection devices in the toolbox include:
• Speed Lump • Raised Crosswalk
• Speed Table

ADVANTAGES
• Effective in reducing speeds
• Maintains repaid emergency response
times
• Relatively easy for bicyclists to cross

DISADVANTAGES
• Maintenance can be challenging
• Vehicles with wide wheelbase can pass
through the lump using wheel cut-outs
• Increased noise from vehicles
accelerating
187
City of American Canyon — Traffic Calming Report
March 2024
22 Speed Table
Speed tables are flat-topped speed humps approximately 22 feet long, which is typically long enough for the entire wheelbase of a passenger car to rest on top. Their long flat fields, plus ramps that are more gently sloped than speed lumps, give speed tables higher design speeds than lumps and thus may be more appropriate for streets with higher ambient speeds. Concrete is the preferred material. Stamped concrete can give the appearance of brick or other textured materials, which would improve the appearance of speed tables, draw attention to them, and may enhance safety and speed reduction.

Source: XFXL

ADVANTAGES
• Effective in reducing speeds, though
not to the extent of speed lumps
• Maintenance is easier than speed
lumps
• Slightly higher design speed
compared to speed lumps –
compatible with collector streets and
on grades

DISADVANTAGES
• Increased noise from vehicles
accelerating
188
City of American Canyon — Traffic Calming Report
March 2024
23 Raised Crosswalk
Raised crosswalks are speed tables striped with crosswalk markings and signage to channelize pedestrian crossings, providing pedestrians with a level street crossing. Also, by raising the level of the crossing, pedestrians are more visible to approaching motorists. Stamped concrete can give the appearance of brick or other textured materials, which would improve the appearance of speed tables, draw attention to them, and may enhance safety and speed reduction.

ADVANTAGES
• Effective in reducing speeds, though
not to the extent of speed lumps
• Maintenance is easier than speed
lumps
• Improve safety for both vehicles and
pedestrians

DISADVANTAGES
• Increased noise from vehicles
accelerating
• Impact to drainage needs to be
considered
189
City of American Canyon — Traffic Calming Report
March 2024
24 Traffic Circle
Traffic circles are raised islands, placed in intersections, around which traffic circulates. Stop signs can be used as traffic controls at the approaches of the traffic circle. Circles prevent drivers from speeding through intersections by impeding the straight-through movement and forcing drivers to slow down to yield. Depending upon the size of the intersection and circle, trucks may be permitted to turn left in front of the circle, and the agency can use mountable curbs if turn radii are a concern for emergency vehicles and/or trucks.

Speed Control – Horizontal Devices
Horizontal deflection devices use raised islands to eliminate straight-line paths along roadways and through intersections.

The horizontal deflection devices in the toolbox include:
• Traffic Circle • Median with Horizontal Deflection
• Roundabout (Single Lane) • Slow Turn Wedges
• Hardened Centerlines/Rubber Speed Bumps

ADVANTAGES
• Very effective in moderating speeds
and improving safety
• Can have positive aesthetic value

DISADVANTAGES
• If not designed properly, difficult for
emergency vehicles or large trucks to
travel around
• Must be designed so that the
circulating traffic does not encroach on
crosswalks
• Potential loss of on-street parking
190
City of American Canyon — Traffic Calming Report
March 2024
25 Roundabout (Single Lane)
Like traffic circles, roundabouts require traffic to circulate counterclockwise around a center island. But unlike circles, roundabouts are used on higher volume streets to allocate right-of-way among competing movements. They are found primarily on collector streets, often substituting for traffic signals. They are larger than neighborhood traffic circles, have raised splitter islands to channel approaching traffic to the right, and do not have stop signs. Due to the large amount of required right-of-way and construction costs, roundabouts may be most appropriate for new developments or redevelopment areas.

ADVANTAGES
• Enhanced safety compared to a traffic
signal or stop sign
• Minimizes queuing at approaches to
the intersection
• Less expensive to operate than traffic
signals
• Can have positive aesthetic value
• Shorter pedestrian crossing distance

DISADVANTAGES
• May require major reconstruction of an
existing intersection
• Loss of on-street parking
• Continuous flow of traffic limits
opportunity for pedestrians to cross
(compared to signal)
• May present additional obstacles to
visually impaired pretentions
191
City of American Canyon — Traffic Calming Report
March 2024
26 Medians with Horizonal Deflection
Medians are raised islands placed in the middle of the roadway around which traffic circulates. Medians do not always have horizontal deflection. To meet this definition, a median must extend into the travel lane to eliminate the straight-line path and force drivers to slow down to navigate the curve.

ADVANTAGES
• Effective in moderating speeds and
improving safety
• Where pedestrian crossing activity is
expected, can provide two-stage
crossing opportunities
• Can have positive aesthetic value

DISADVANTAGES
• Can increase potential for fixed object
collisions
• Potential loss of on-street parking
192
City of American Canyon — Traffic Calming Report
March 2024
27 Slow Turn Wedges
Slow turn wedges use markings and flexible plastic posts to buffer pedestrians from traffic and shrink the area where they could get hit by a car.

ADVANTAGES
• Effective in reducing speeds and
conflicts with pedestrians/bicyclists
• Discourages drivers from cutting
corners and encourages following the
proper path when making left turns
• Low cost

DISADVANTAGES
• Potentially limited to one-way streets
• Less durable than raised concrete
islands
Source: NYC DOT
193
City of American Canyon — Traffic Calming Report
March 2024
28 Hardened Centerlines/Rubber Speed Bumps
Hardened centerlines are bollards that prevent left-turners from crossing the centerlines to make a turn.

Pedestrian islands can also accomplish the same goal if they are placed strategically, with the added benefit of being more durable and providing refuge for walkers.

Rubber speed bumps are often used in conjunction with hardened centerlines and placed in an intersection. There are a variety of design configurations.

ADVANTAGES
• Effective in reducing speeds and
conflicts with pedestrians/bicyclists
• Discourages drivers from cutting
corners and encourages following the
proper path when making left turns
• Low cost

DISADVANTAGES
• Less durable than raised concrete
islands
Source: qz.com and NYC DOT
194
City of American Canyon — Traffic Calming Report
March 2024
29 Bulb-out/Curb Extension
Bulb-outs and curb extensions extend the sidewalk into the parking lane to narrow the roadway at intersections. Their effectiveness in calming traffic is limited by the absence of vertical or horizontal deflection, but they can still be beneficial. Bulb-outs can make intersections more pedestrian friendly by shortening the crossing distance and decreasing the curb radii, thus reducing turning vehicle speeds. Both of these effects increase pedestrian comfort and safety at the intersection.

Speed Control – Vertical Devices
Narrowing devices use raised islands, curb extensions, and other treatments to narrow the travel lane for motorists. They are not as effective as vertical or horizontal devices but can still provide traffic calming.

The narrowing devices in the toolbox include:
• Bulb-Out/Curb Extension • Median Without Horizontal
• Two-Lane Choker Deflection/Pedestrian Refuge Island
• Street Trees

ADVANTAGES
• Reduces pedestrian crossing distance
and exposure to vehicles
• Through and left-turn movements are
easily negotiable by larger vehicles
• Creates protected on-street parking
bays
• Reduces speeds (especially rightturning vehicles)

DISADVANTAGES
• Effectiveness is limited by the absence
of deflection
• May slow right-turning emergency
vehicles
• Potential loss of on-street parking
195
City of American Canyon — Traffic Calming Report
March 2024
30 Two-Lane Choker
Chokers are curb extensions at midblock that narrow a street. Chokers leave the street cross section with two lanes that are narrower than the normal cross section. Their effectiveness in calming traffic is limited by the absence of vertical or horizontal deflection, but they can still be beneficial.

ADVANTAGES
• Easily negotiable by emergency
vehicles and buses
• Can have positive aesthetic value
• Reduces speeds

DISADVANTAGES
• Effect on vehicle speeds is limited by
the absence of vertical or horizontal
deflection
• May require bicyclists to briefly merge
with vehicular traffic
• Potential loss of on-street parking
• Build-up of debris in gutter
196
City of American Canyon — Traffic Calming Report
March 2024
31 Street Trees
Trees placed along streets can potentially help reduce motor vehicle speeds and collisions, though studies show mixed results. Streets lined with trees or with landscaped center medians can affect driver perception of lane width, called an “edge effect”. Street trees require irrigation in arid climates.

ADVANTAGES
• Low cost
• Positive aesthetic value and
placemaking
• Reduces speeds, though studies are
limited
• Environmental benefits like reduces
flooding and carbon emissions
• Shade enhances pedestrian
experience

DISADVANTAGES
• Requires maintenance
Source: University of Washington
197
City of American Canyon — Traffic Calming Report
March 2024
32 Median Without Horizontal Deflection/Pedestrian Refuge Island Medians are raised islands placed in the middle of the roadway around which traffic circulates. Medians without horizontal deflection do not extend into the travel lane, maintaining a straight-line path for drivers. While they are not as effective as medians with horizontal deflection, they can still be beneficial.

They can act as pedestrian refuges, increasing pedestrian safety, and provide aesthetic benefits.

ADVANTAGES
• Can increase pedestrian safety
• Can have positive aesthetic value
• Reduces speeds

DISADVANTAGES
• Effect on vehicle speeds is limited by
the absence of vertical or horizontal
deflection
• Potential loss of on-street parking
198
City of American Canyon — Traffic Calming Report
March 2024
33 Full Closure
Full street closures are barriers placed across a street to close the street completely to through traffic, usually leaving only sidewalks or bicycle paths open. The barriers may consist of landscaped islands, walls, gates, side-by-side bollards, or any other obstructions that leave an opening smaller than the width of a passenger car. Emergency vehicles are accommodated via removable bollards or similar devices.

Volume Control Devices
Diversion devices use raised islands and curb extensions to preclude particular vehicle movements, such as left turn or through movements, usually at an intersection.

The volume control devices in the toolbox include:
• Full Closure • Diagonal Diverter
• Half Closure • Forced-Turn Island

ADVANTAGES
• Very effective in reducing cut-through
traffic volumes
• Able to maintain pedestrian and
bicycle connectivity
• Can be designed to maintain access
for emergency vehicles

DISADVANTAGES
• Causes circuitous routes for local
residents
• Diverts traffic to another street
199
City of American Canyon — Traffic Calming Report
March 2024
34 Half Closure
Half closures (or partial street closures) are barriers that block travel in one direction for a short distance on otherwise two-way streets. Partial closures are often used in sets to make travel through neighborhoods with “gridded” streets circuitous rather than direct.

ADVANTAGES
• Able to maintain two-way bicycle
access
• Effective in reducing traffic volumes

DISADVANTAGES
• Causes circuitous routes for local
residents
• May limit access to businesses
• Divers can bypass the barrier
• Diverts traffic to another street
Source: FHWA Safety
200
City of American Canyon — Traffic Calming Report
March 2024
35 Diagonal Diverter
Diagonal diverters are barriers placed diagonally across an intersection, blocking through movement. Like half closures, diagonal diverters are usually staggered to create circuitous routes through neighborhoods.

ADVANTAGES
• Reduces traffic volumes
• Able to maintain full pedestrian and
bicycle access

DISADVANTAGES
• Causes circuitous routes for local
residents
• Delays for emergency services
• May require reconstruction of corner
curbs
201
City of American Canyon — Traffic Calming Report
March 2024
36 Forced-Turn Island
Forced-turn islands are raised islands that prohibit certain movements on approaches to an intersection.

ADVANTAGES
• Can improve safety at an intersection
by prohibiting critical turning
movements
• Effective in reducing traffic volumes

DISADVANTAGES
• If designed improperly, drivers can
maneuver around the island to make
an illegal movement
• May divert a traffic problem to a
parallel street
Palo Alto, CA
Source: NACTO
202
City of American Canyon –
Traffic Calming Program
S T E V E N B R O W N , T E , R S P 1 | F E H R & P E E R S 203
Intro
What is Traffic Calming?
Traffic calming is the combination of measures that
reduce the negative effects of motor vehicle use,
alter driver behavior, and improve conditions for
non-motorized street users. (It) consists of physical
design and other measures put in place on existing
roads to reduce vehicle speeds and improve safety
for pedestrians and cyclists.

SOURCE: US DOT
204
• Last program adopted in 2011
• “We Safe Streets” webpage
Existing Program
205
• Systematic approach to treat
neighborhood traffic-related issues
in the City
• System to support the communities
desires to “calm” neighborhood
streets
• Petition-based
What is the Traffic Program?
Existing Program
206
• Tie to Existing Plans and Programs
• Streamlined process for approval from key stakeholders • Toolbox categorized by functional classification
Wants From the Traffic Program Update
Existing Program
207
Development
• Review of Best Practices
• Discussion with Traffic Working Group
• Update Traffic Calming Program
• City Council Review/Approval
Development of the Traffic Calming Program
208
Development
• Prior Efforts to Build Upon
• City of American Canyon Local Roadway Safety Plan (2022) • Berkeley SafeTREC Complete Streets Safety Assessment (2022) • NVTA Vision Zero Plan (2023)
Development of the Traffic Calming Program
209
Components
• Process

1. Plan Initiation

2. Plan Development

3. Plan Support

4. Plan Implementation
• Traffic Calming Toolbox
• Traffic Calming Devices
• Guidelines on when and where to implement devices
Two Main Components of a TCP
210
Process – Proposed Overview of American Canyon’s TCP Process 211
Toolbox – Proposed Traffic Calming “Toolbox”
• Menu of commonly used traffic calming devices
• Devices vary in terms of effectiveness
• Non-physical measures
• Speed control
• Vertical measures
• Horizontal measures
• Narrowing measures
• Volume control
212
Toolbox – Proposed Traffic Calming “Toolbox”
Speed Feedback Sign
Traffic Circle
Forced-Turn Island 213
Toolbox – Proposed Traffic Calming “Toolbox”
214
Toolbox – Proposed Traffic Calming “Toolbox”
215
Benefits
• Ties concerns to locations identified in previous efforts • Identifies federal, state, regional, and local funding sources for implementation funding
• Allows for a more streamlined distribution of funding and staff resources
Benefits of New Program
216

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
MAY 7, 2024

STAFF REPORT

BUSINESS
ITEM NUMBER: 18.

TITLE
2024 Water Supply and Demand Update

RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file a report on water supply and demand in the City of American Canyon Water Service Area.

CONTACT
Erica Ahmann Smithies, P.E., Public Works Director
Dominic Patrick, Water Systems Manager

BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS
The State Water Project (SWP) is a cri5cal resource for 29 public agencies that serve water to 27 million Californians, including American Canyon. The main source for the City’s water supply is the SWP, which is operated by Department of Water Resources (DWR).

Raw SWP Water is delivered from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta (Delta) and conveyed approximate 27 miles through the North Bay Aqueduct (NBA) system to American Canyon's Water Treatment Plant (WTP). American Canyon is contracted to receive 5,200-acre feet per year (AFPY) in SWP Water (Table "A"). The actual amount of SWP Water available to American Canyon varies each year due to hydraulic conditions and environmental/regulatory requirements.

Sources of Water
On April 2, 2024, DWR reported snow survey results indicated 64 inches of snow depth, snow water equivalent to 27.5 inches which is 113% of average. As of April 20, 2024, 15 of 17 major reservoirs in California are over 100% of average level (Attachment 1) In 2024, American Canyon will receive 65% of its Table A allocation (Attachment 2) In addi5on, American Canyon has 2,600 AF of "Ar5cle 56 Carryover Water". (Water not used by the end of the year is "carried over" to the following year.) American Canyon also has 500 AFPY of Vallejo Permit Water ("non-project" raw water also delivered through the NBA).
217
Lastly, when the Delta is in "excess ouElow condi5ons", American Canyon is eligible for "Ar5cle 21 Water". (Ar5cle 21 Water is excess "project water" available from the NBA depending on deliveries, allocations, operations, reservoir storage and snow surveys.) American Canyon’s total available water supply year to date is 6,779-acre feet (AF). The City's total allocations include:

Water Classification Amount
Table A 3,380 Acre-feet
Article 56 Carryover 2,600 Acre-feet
Vallejo Permit 500 Acre-feet
Article 21 299 Acre-feet
Forecasted Demands
The City's water demands last year January-March 2023 was an es5mated 464 AF. Current data reflects customer consump5on is consistent at 462 AF, January-March 2024. Historical water demand since 2019 has ranged from 2,064 to 2,884 AFY as shown below:

Year Volume
2019 2,603 Acre-feet
2020 2,884 Acre-feet
2021 2,795 Acre-feet
2022 2,609 Acre-feet
2023 2,064 Acre-feet
Our current water supply at 6,779 AF exceeds the highest demand from the last 5 years.

COUNCIL PRIORITY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS
Infrastructure: "Develop and maintain infrastructure resources to support sustainable growth."

FISCAL IMPACT
Not applicable.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Providing the Water Demand and Supply Report is not a "project" under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). Further, the item is categorically exempt from CEQA review as an ac5on by an agency for the protec5on of natural resources (pursuant to CEQA Guidelines sec5on 15307) and for the protection of the environment (pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15308). 218
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Major Reservoirs Levels in California

2. 2024 State Water Project Allocation
219
220
221
222
223
City Council Committee Report
Submitted
by: * Councilmember Mark Joseph
Council
Meeting
Date:
05/07/2024
Event
Date: 2024-04-17
Event Type Committee Report
Event Title: * Napa Valley Transportation Authority (NVTA) Event Report:

Received our quarterly project update (see attached)
Heard an update on the Agency's Performance Metrics--this is an effort to quantify the various elements of our transportation programs (Equity, Safety, Congestion Relief, Economic and Environmental Sustainability; and Maintenance).  Overall, we're doing ok and Covid played a big role in hurting our results.  For me, the fact that NVTA is measuring its outcomes is the important point.  Over time, we'll get better, and now we can prove it! Confirmed that AmCan will receive $1.3 million for capital projects, thanks to our successful Housing Element (last cycle).

Received a summary of new polling for Measure U; bottom line, it is still rated highly by the community (70+%), but it is vulnerable to negative campaigning.  The PowerPoint is attached.

Related to this, all six jurisdictions supported Measure U's expenditure plan, almost entirely by unanimous votes! File/Photo Upload
Project Updates April 2024.pdf 2.32MB
24-9194- Supplemental Information by Region.pdf 156.8KB EMC Research Presentation - 3-24.pdf 409.49KB
Max file size for all uploads is 25 MB
Event
Date: 2024-05-01
Event Type Committee Report
Event Title: * Bay Adapt Local Electeds Regional Task Force meeting Event Report:

This is the ad hoc advisory body to BCDC and its mandate to develop guidelines to address Sea Level Rise (SLR).  I met remotely.

I provided an update on our Eco-Center and Wetlands Restoration Plan Heard an update on the project--under SB272, BCDC needs to provide standards and guidelines to address SLR by the end of this year.

Local jurisdictions need to develop our plans by 2034 (preferably well sooner than that!), and SB1 (unrelated to Road funding) provides grants to Cities to help with this effort.  Also, BCDC will help.

This is something we need to begin talking about internally.  Our Wetlands Restoration Plan may give us a small foot up over other jurisdictions, but we probably have a lot more work ahead of us! Lastly, we heard from two agencies that are already working on this--San Mateo and Marin Counties.  In general, the key is good collaboration among the jurisdictions, and giving yourself about 10 years to work things out! File/Photo Upload Max file size for all uploads is 25 MB Event
Date:

Event Type Community Event
Event Title: * Kiwanis Activities
224
Event Report:

Helped with the monthly Food Distribution:  114 boxes of food was handed out, and we ran out for the third month in a row!
Zoom meeting about installing new playground equipment at the Boys & Girls Club--probably around mid-July.  This will be a joint effort between two Kiwanis Clubs (us and one of the Napa Clubs).

General Membership Meeting was held in Room 5 of Napa Junction Community Center--a great turnout, perhaps because we heard a presentation from a local student who went to Carnegie Hall (and we helped sponsor) to sing in a chorus group (Voena, not ACHS Choir!)
File/Photo Upload Max file size for all uploads is 25 MB Event
Date:

Event Type Community Event
Event Title: * American Canyon Arts Foundation
Event Report:

Attended the Napa County Arts & Culture Commission.  ACAF is requesting a $7500 grant to produce cultural programs and a new performing event:  ParkFest!  The Commission recommended full funding ! Held our monthly Open Mic in Room 5.  Smaller turnout this month, but we picked up two new members and two more monthly sponsors!  Only $100/month, and we'll throw in a free membership! Attended the High School show:  Legally Blonde, along with a few ACAF members.  It was a great show! Attended the semi-annual TBID meeting, mainly to request funding for Juneteenth.  Worked out great--the Board recommended giving both proposals (our Juneteenth and the Reindeer Run) equal amounts.  Also heard the Visit Napa Valley update.

File/Photo Upload Max file size for all uploads is 25 MB Event
Date:

Event Type Community Event
Event Title: * Community Events and Activities
Event Report:

Attended the School District's Town Hall meeting relating to one of their teachers being arrested for sexual assault.

The meeting was well attended, you knew some of the parents were upset, but everyone was civil and good information was provided.  There was some concerns raised about making the arrest on campus, but the Chief handled it well.

Attended the Earth Day festivities at Wetlands Edge Park.  ACAF had a booth and did leaf printing.  Other vendors were there as well.  This is one of two combination events at Wetlands; the other is in October, as part of ACAF's pumpkin path program.

Proud to be at the Annual Volunteer Recognition Ball, held at DoubleTree.  The event was much better than last year, and we can still do better.  Congratulations to Kristin Einberger, our 2024 Gateway Award Winner!!! File/Photo Upload Max file size for all uploads is 25 MB 225
Supplemental Information- NVTA 2024 Survey Results| 1
Top Components By Region
Q7-18. *sorted by total importance rating
% Rating as Total Important
Overall
City of Napa
(56%)
American
Canyon
(15%)
Calistoga/
St Helena/
Yountville
(10%)
Unincorp.
(19%)
Repair roads and fix potholes 91% 90% 95% 91% 91%
Improve highways to reduce traffic congestion 71% 68% 85% 75% 69% Reduce traffic congestion 69% 65% 86% 65% 69%
Redesign the intersection of Highway 29 and 12 and Airport Boulevard to reduce traffic congestion, increase safety, and improve evacuation routes 69% 68% 82% 65% 61% Improve safety on routes to school for children and families 68% 68% 76% 63% 67% Make biking and walking safer 66% 63% 71% 74% 67%
Redesign Highway 29 through American Canyon to improve traffic flow, increase safety, and enhance evacuation routes 66% 63% 92% 56% 60%
Improve evacuation routes 64% 63% 76% 61% 60%
Make transit more affordable for veterans, seniors, students, and people with disabilities 58% 55% 76% 66% 51% Reduce greenhouse gas emissions 57% 58% 58% 64% 49%
Improve public transit service throughout the county 50% 46% 61% 64% 47% Redesign the intersection of Silverado Trail, Coombsville Road, 3rd St, and East Ave to improve traffic flow, increase safety, and enhance evacuation routes 48% 49% 47% 43% 47% 226
Napa County Transportation
Sales Tax Feasibility Survey
Summary Presentation
Presented to NVTA Board 4/17/24227
24-9194 NVTA Transportation Measure Survey | 2
Methodology
 Hybrid Email- and Text-to-Web/ live telephone survey of likely November 2024 voters  Survey conducted March 10-17, 2024
 600 interviews; overall margin of error ±4.0 percentage points  Interviews were conducted in English and Spanish by trained, professional interviewers; landlines and mobile phones included
 Where applicable, results compared with the following:

Methodology Dates Universe Sample Size Margin of Error EMC # Mixed Mode June 14-21, 2023 Likely Nov. 2024 Voters 600 +4.0 percentage points 23-8918 Please note that due to rounding, some percentages may not add up to exactly 100%. 228
24-9194 NVTA Transportation Measure Survey | 3
Demographic Profile of Respondents
67%
13%
12%
8%
White
Hispanic/Latino
Another identity
(Ref)
48%
52%
Male
Female
Gender Age Ethnicity
39%
26%
35%
18-49
50-64
65+
City
56%
15%
10%
19%
Napa
American Canyon
Calistoga/St
Helena/Yountville
Unincorporated
Party Registration
52%
23%
25%
Democrat
Republican
NPP/Other
65%
35%
Primarily
Drive
Other Mode
Primary Transit Mode
229
24-9194 NVTA Transportation Measure Survey | 4
Key Findings
 Voters in Napa County generally feel things are going well in the area, and express strong support for continuing to pay taxes for high-quality roads and traffic congestion reduction.  Four-in-five voters say they would vote to approve a transportation sales tax renewal for the County.
 City of Napa voters are just as likely to support the measure as those outside the city, even when informed about a potential city sales tax measure that may be on the same ballot.  Voters continue to prioritize the importance of pothole and road repairs, traffic congestion relief, and pedestrian and cyclist safety improvements.  Emphasizing that the measure will not increase taxes will be a critical point, as well as accountability components and the access it will provide to matching funds.  Consistent with prior polling, the renewal measure shows vulnerability to negative messaging around the duration and borrowing mechanism of the proposed measure. 230
24-9194 NVTA Transportation Measure Survey | 5
Right
Direction
58%
Right
Direction
65%
Wrong
Track
38%
Wrong
Track
32%
(Don't
Know)
4%
(Don't
Know)
3%
Right Direction/Wrong Track Over Time
Voters today are more optimistic about the direction of Napa County than they were in prior polling.

Q3. Do you feel that things in Napa County are generally going in the right direction or do you feel things are pretty seriously off on the wrong track?
2023 2024
231
24-9194 NVTA Transportation Measure Survey | 6
45%
17%
39%
17% 1%
9%
27%
7%
38%
83%
35%
16%
64%
+67
-30
It is crucial to have high-quality local roads
and reduce traffic congestion, even if it
means maintaining current taxes
I will vote no on any tax measure, no matter
what it is for
Strongly
Agree
Somewhat
Agree
(Don't
Know)
Somewhat
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
Tax Attitudes
Q19-20. Please tell me whether you strongly agree, somewhat agree, somewhat disagree, or strongly disagree with each of the following statements.

The vast majority of voters agree that quality roads and transit are important, even if it means maintaining current taxes.

Just a third of voters say they’d oppose any tax measure.

Total
Agree
Total
Disagree
Net
Agree
232
24-9194 NVTA Transportation Measure Survey | 7
Initial Vote: Transportation Sales Tax
Voters continue to overwhelmingly support a transportation sales tax renewal in Napa County.

Q4/6. If the election were held today, would you vote yes to approve or no to reject this measure? 78%
20%
80%
17%
Yes
79%
No
21%
Yes
81%
No
18%
Yes No Yes No
2023 2024
Without raising taxes, shall the Napa Valley Transportation Authority implement an updated Transportation Expenditure Plan to repair roads and improve highways; fix potholes; reduce traffic congestion; improve evacuation routes; make transit more affordable for veterans, seniors, students, and people with disabilities; and make biking and walking safer; by continuing its ½ cent transportation sales tax with no increase, providing $25,000,000 annually for 30 years, with citizen oversight, and all funds dedicated to serving transportation needs in Napa County? 233
24-9194 NVTA Transportation Measure Survey | 8
81%
79%
82%
91%
81%
1%
1%
1%
2%
2%
18%
20%
17%
8%
17%
+63
+59
+64
+83
+64
Overall
City of Napa (56%)
American Canyon (15%)
Calistoga/St Helena/Yountville (10%)
Unincorporated (19%)
Yes (Undecided) No
Initial Vote: Transportation Sales Tax by Subgroups
Q4. If the election were held today, would you vote yes to approve or no to reject this measure? Strong majorities of voters across the County vote to approve the transportation sales tax measure.

Net
Yes
After being informed of a potential City of Napa sales tax, 76% of City of Napa voters continue to support a transportation sales tax measure. 234
24-9194 NVTA Transportation Measure Survey | 9
Top Measure Components
Q7-18. On a scale from one to seven, where one is not at all important and seven is extremely important, please tell me how important each of the following is to you.

Voters continue to rate pothole repair and traffic congestion reduction as important components of a transportation measure. 63%
34%
33%
29%
36%
36%
28%
38%
36%
39%
32%
30%
91%
71%
69%
69%
68%
66%
Repair roads and fix potholes
Improve highways to reduce traffic congestion
Reduce traffic congestion
Redesign the intersection of Highway 29 and 12 and
Airport Boulevard to improve traffic flow, increase
safety, and enhance evacuation routes
Improve safety on routes to schools for children and
families
Make biking and walking safer
7 - Extremely important 5-6 Total Important
2023 Top Components
(by % Total Important)
Fix potholes 83%
Repair roads and improve
highways 81%
Reduce traffic congestion 72%
Redesign Hwy 29 through
American Canyon 71%
Improve safety on routes to
school 70%
235
24-9194 NVTA Transportation Measure Survey | 10
Top Measure Components
Q7-18. On a scale from one to seven, where one is not at all important and seven is extremely important, please tell me how important each of the following is to you.

Other components are also rated important by a majority of voters, though with lesser intensity. 35%
32%
30%
30%
23%
19%
31%
32%
29%
27%
28%
29%
66%
64%
58%
57%
50%
48%
Redesign Highway 29 through American Canyon to
improve traffic flow, increase safety, and enhance
evacuation routes
Improve evacuation routes
Make transit more affordable for veterans, seniors,
students, and people with disabilities
Reduce greenhouse gas emissions
Improve public transit service throughout the county
Redesign the intersection of Silverado Trail, Coombsville Road, 3rd St, and East Ave to improve traffic flow,
increase safety, and enhance evacuation routes
7 - Extremely important 5-6 Total Important
236
24-9194 NVTA Transportation Measure Survey | 11
Additional Information
Q21-28. Next I’d like to read you statements from people who support the proposed measure. After each one, please tell me how convincing that statement is as a reason to vote for the measure.

Matching fund opportunities and accountability mechanisms, the fact that this measure does not raise taxes, and emphasizing safety for kids and families are the most compelling reasons to support a measure. 35%
35%
30%
31%
39%
39%
42%
34%
74%
74%
73%
65%
Very
convincing
Somewhat
convincing
Total
Convincing
This measure will bring millions of dollars in state and federal matching funds to Napa County for critical transportation projects, and strong controls like citizen oversight and independent audits will ensure all funds are spent as promised.

This measure will not increase taxes by one penny. This measure will just extend the existing sales tax while updating the plan to improve transportation across the County
This measure will make walking and cycling safer for kids and families going to schools by improving sidewalks and bike lanes and improving our most dangerous intersections.

Most of the money from this measure will go towards fixing potholes and repairing roads all over Napa County.
237
24-9194 NVTA Transportation Measure Survey | 12
Additional Information
Q21-28. Next I’d like to read you statements from people who support the proposed measure. After each one, please tell me how convincing that statement is as a reason to vote for the measure.

Talking about traffic congestion relief is also convincing to two-thirds of voters, though just a quarter say feel it is very convincing.
27%
25%
24%
18%
42%
41%
40%
32%
69%
66%
65%
51%
Very
convincing
Somewhat
convincing
This measure will reduce traffic congestion by improving highways and intersections to help traffic flow more smoothly and reduce waiting.

This measure will make our communities safer in emergencies by improving evacuation routes and installing electronic information signs along major routes to communicate real-time traffic and evacuation information.

This measure will support public transit and reduce fares for seniors, veterans, people with disabilities, and students — the people who depend on it to get to the grocery store, doctors’ appointments, school and work.

This measure will reduce greenhouse gas emissions, improve air quality, and help combat climate change.

Total
Convincing
238
24-9194 NVTA Transportation Measure Survey | 13
Vote After Information
After hearing additional information, four-in-five voters continue to support a transportation sales tax renewal measure.

Q4/29. If the election were held today, would you vote yes to approve or no to reject this measure? 80%
17%
81%
18%
Lean 1%
Yes
81%
No
18%
Yes
82%
No
18%
Yes No Yes No
Initial After
Information
239
24-9194 NVTA Transportation Measure Survey | 14
81% 82%
56%
18% 18%
42%
1% 2%
Initial After Information After Vulnerabilities
Yes No (Don't know)/Undecided
Vote Progression
Similar to the 2023 survey, the measure appears vulnerable to opposition.

Q4/29/30. Now, given everything you’ve heard, would you vote yes to approve or no to reject this measure?
Some people say this measure just isn’t necessary. We already have a tax for transportation in Napa County; this measure changes that tax to allow the government to borrow against this revenue, costing taxpayers more in interest. It also extends the tax all the way through 2054, which is just too long. With other tax measures likely to be on the upcoming ballot that could address more critical topics like homelessness, crime, and schools, and the cost of living constantly increasing, we should reject this unnecessary tax and send the message that the people have had enough.
240
Sara LaBatt
[email protected]
510-550-8924
Harrison Louie
[email protected]
206-204-8048
241

NVTA PROJECT UPDATE
April 17, 2024
Grant Bailey, PE/Program Manager –
Engineer, NVTA
2 242
2 Napa Valley College Bus Stop
Project Objective: Eliminate loop in NB service route to Napa Valley College by expanding existing bus stop on James Diemer Dr. • Benefits
 Reduce NB trip times by 10 minutes
 Save 200 minutes of NB time every weekday
 Provide clearly designated NB & SB stops
• Schedule
 Design: April 23 – March 24
 Construction Bid & Contract Award: April 24 – June 24  Construction: June 24 – August 24
• Issues/Risks
 City utility licensing agreement
• Costs
 Preconstruction: $150,000
 Construction Estimate: $650,000
Project Manager: Grant Bailey
243
3 Napa Valley College Bus Stop
New
Stop
Location
244
4 Napa Valley College Bus Stop
Project Scope
 Add northbound bus stop with shelter
 Install a crosswalk from existing stop with RRFB
 Speed Tables
 Retaining Wall, curb, gutter, and sidewalk
 Guardrail
245
5 Soscol Junction
Project Objective: reduce congestion on SR 29 by removing a signalized intersection at SR 221/Soscol Ferry Rd and SR 29 through grade separated roundabouts. Project Manager: Grant Bailey • Status
 Soscol Ferry Rd closed to SR 29 & SR 221 - detoured
 Roundabout construction ongoing
 Northbound traffic switched to
overcrossing in January 2024
• Upcoming Work/Risks
 Shift southbound SR29 traffic to bridge
crossing - Tonight
 SR221 single lane closure targeted mid-June
 Swainson’s Hawk
• Schedule
 Ribbon Cutting – Summer 2024
 Contract Completion Target: November
2024
• Costs
 Preconstruction: $11.4M
 Construction: $37.7M
 Construction Support: $5.7M 246
6 Vine Trail – St. Helena to Calistoga
Project Objective: Build an 8-mile segment of Vine Trail connecting Calistoga & St Helena, furthering build out of the 47-mile overall trail. • Milestones
 Work resumed April 2024
 HAWK signals constructed
• Upcoming Work
 Reach 1 & 2 rough grading
 Trail barrier installs
 Property frontage alterations
• Issues/Risks
 Archaeological discoveries
 Property owners
• Costs
 Preconstruction: $3.2M
 Construction Estimate: $15.2M
Project Manager: Grant Bailey
247
7 SR 29 American Canyon Corridor
Project Objective: make
operational and intersection
improvements and add
multimodal facilities along SR
29 between Napa Junction
Road and American Canyon
Road.
• Cost
 Pre-construction - $20 million
 Construction - $55 million
• Status
 PA&ED kicked off April 24
 Begin public outreach
• Schedule (pending funding)
 2023 – PID approval (complete)
 2024-25 – Environmental
 2026-27 – Design
 2026-27 – Right-of-way
 2027 – Construction (funding
dependent)
Project Manager: Grant Bailey
248
Q&A – Thank you!
Grant Bailey, PE/Program Manager, Engineer
Email: [email protected]
Phone: 707-259-5951
249
Future Agenda Items of Note:

May 21, 2024: 6:30 p.m.

Proclamation - Memorial Day
Proclamation - Public Works Week
Proclamation - Bike Month
Presentation – Vine Trail Update
Presentation – ACPD Police Explorer
Kids Commerce Fee Waiver
Commissioner Appointment Review
LLAD Fiscal Year 24/25 Budget
Ordinance to Amend Design Permit Regulations
Proposed Fiscal Year 24/25 Budget
June 4, 2024; 6:30 p.m.

Proclamation - Juneteenth
Proclamation – LGBTQ/Pride Month
Presentation – Annual Housing Authority Report
Presentation - Fair Housing Napa Valley
Final Fiscal Year 2024/25 Budget
GIR Project: Authority to Issue Bonds, etc.

June 18, 2024; 7:30 p.m.

Special Joint City Council Meeting with Open Space, Active Transportation and Sustainability Commission
June 18, 2024; 8:30 p.m.

Special Joint City Council Meeting with Parks and Community Services Commission July 2, 2024; 6:30 p.m. City Council Meeting Canceled
250