Agenda packet — American Canyon City Council, June 2, 2026 (part 1 of 3)

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
City Hall - Council Chambers
4381 Broadway St., Suite 201, American Canyon
June 2, 2026
6:30 PM

1. Conference with Legal Counsel – An*cipated Li*ga*on. Authorized pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 (d)(2). One (1) Matter.

Mayor: Pierre Washington
Vice Mayor: Mayor Mark Joseph
Councilmembers: Brando Cruz, Melissa Lamattina, David Oro

AMENDED AGENDA
This agenda has been amended to add attachments 12 and 13 to Business Item 18. Citywide Circulation.
6:00 P.M. CLOSED SESSION
The mayor will call the meeng to order and conduct roll call. Following public comment on Closed Session items, the Council will immediately convene in Closed Session.

CALL TO ORDER - CLOSED SESSION

ROLL CALL - CLOSED SESSION

PUBLIC COMMENT - CLOSED SESSION ITEMS
This me is reserved for members of the public to address the City Council on Closed Session Business items only. Oral comments must be made in person and are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker.

MEETING RECESSED TO CLOSED SESSION
The Council will reconvene in Open Session at 6:30 p.m. The Council may reconvene in Closed Session at the conclusion of the meeting, if necessary, to address any remaining items.

BUSINESS - CLOSED SESSION
6:30 P.M. OPEN SESSION

CALL TO ORDER - OPEN SESSION

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

ROLL CALL - OPEN SESSION

CLOSED SESSION REPORT OUT / CONFIRMATION OF REPORTABLE ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA JUNE 2, 2026
1 2. Proclamation: June 2026 as PRIDE Month

3. Proclamation: Juneteenth Independence Day

4. Presentation: American Canyon Annual Report from the City of Napa Housing Authority

5. Minutes of May 19, 2026
Recommendation: Approve the minutes of the Regular City Council mee5ng held May 19, 2026.

6. Projects Funded by SB1/Road Maintenance and Rehabilita*on Account (RMRA) for Fiscal Year 2026/27
Recommendation: Adopt a Resolu5on approving a list of projects for Fiscal Year 2026/27 funded by SB1: The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017.

7. Construction Contract Award for the Green Island Road Maintenance Project (PW26-0100) Recommendation: Adopt a Resolu5on awarding a construc5on contract to O.C. Jones & Sons, Inc. in the amount of $140,070 and authorizing the Public Works Director to approve Contract Change Orders in an aggregate amount not to exceed $220,000, in conjunc5on with the Green Island Road Maintenance Project (PW26-0100).

8. Napa Pasture Protein Grazing Agreement Amendment No. 2 Recommendation: Adopt a Resolu5on authorizing the City Manager to enter into Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 2024-71 with Napa Pasture Protein, increasing the contract amount $128,000, for a total amount not to exceed $364, 000 for Fiscal Year 26/27 citywide grazing.

9. Janitorial Services Agreement
Recommendation: Adopt a Resolu5on authorizing the City Manager to enter into an agreement with Karla's Janitorial & Suppliers LLC for janitorial services for a term of one (1) year with an op5on for the City Manager to extend for one (1) year for two (2) additional years.

10. Calling the Municipal Election and Consolidating the Election with Napa County

PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS

PUBLIC COMMENT - ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA
This me is reserved for members of the public to address the City Council on items not appearing on the agenda that are within the Council's jurisdicon. Comments are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker. Pursuant to the Brown Act, the City Council is generally prohibited from discussing or taking action on items not listed on the agenda.

AGENDA CHANGES
The City Council may change the order of the agenda or request discussion of an item on the Consent Calendar. Members of the public may request discussion of a Consent Calendar item during Public Comment.

CONSENT CALENDAR
CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA JUNE 2, 2026
2 Recommendation: Adopt a Resolu5on calling and giving no5ce of a Municipal Elec5on to be held in the City of American Canyon on November 3, 2026, and reques5ng consolida5on of said elec5on with the Statewide General Elec5on and reques5ng elec5on services from the County of Napa.

11. Measure M Initiative Petition - Certification of Sufficiency Recommendation: Adopt a Resolu5on accep5ng the Clerks Cer5ficate of Ini5a5ve Pe55on submiFed by the Napa County Registrar of Voters and acknowledging the qualifica5on of the ini5a5ve pe55on en5tled “Ini5a5ve Measure to Amend American Canyon 2040 General Plan Mobility Element to Add Watson Lane/Marcus Road Circula5on Connec5on Between State Route 29 and Newell Drive” under the California Elections Code.

12. Water Reclamation Facility Sludge Hauling and Biosolids Project Budget Amendment Recommendation: Adopt a Resolu5on amending the FY2025-26 Capital Budget and increasing the FY2025-26 Project Budget from $620,000 to $1,220,000 and authorizing the Public Works Director to execute contract change orders in an aggregate amount not to exceed the Project Budget, in conjunc5on with the Sludge Removal and Hauling Project (WW26-0400).

13. Two-year Intergovernmental Services Agreement with the Housing Authority of the City of Napa (HACN)
Recommendation: Adopt a Resolu5on authorizing the City Manager to sign a two-year Intergovernmental Services Agreement with the Housing Authority of the City of Napa (HACN) for housing-related services for the City of American Canyon during Fiscal Year 2026/27 and 2027/28.

14. Fiscal Year 2026-27 Recommended Budget and Five-Year Capital Improvement Program Recommendation: 1. Adopt a Resolu5on approving adop5on of the Recommended Opera5ng Budget for Fiscal Year 2026-27 and authorizing the City Manager to increase the appropria5ons for FY 2026-27 expenditures in an amount not to exceed the amount encumbered for expenses that did not occur prior to the end of FY 2025-26 but are expected to be expended in FY 2026-27 consistent with the original purpose.

2. Adopt a Resolu5on approving the Five-Year Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Years 2026-27 to 2030-31.

15. Engineer's Report for Citywide LLAD Fiscal Year 26/27 Recommendation: Conduct a Public Hearing and adopt a Resolu5on approving the Fiscal Year 2026/27 Annual Engineer’s Report for the American Canyon Landscaping and Ligh5ng Assessment District, approving the budgets within the Engineer's Report, confirming the assessment diagram and the annual assessment amounts, and authorizing the levy and collection of annual assessment for Fiscal Year 2026/27.

PUBLIC HEARINGS

BUSINESS
CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA JUNE 2, 2026
3 16. Potential Revenue Measure: Draft Ballot Language
Recommendation: Review and provide direction on the updated draft ballot language.

17. Initiative Petition Measure M
Recommendation: Consider Ini5a5ve Pe55on Measure M and provide direc5on pursuant to California Elections Code sections 9212 and 9215 regarding whether to:

Option 1 - Adopt the proposed ordinance without alteration: Adopt a Resolu5on adop5ng, without altera5on, the proposed ordinance submiFed by ini5a5ve pe55on known as Measure M pursuant to California Elections Code 9215(a); or Option 2 - Submit the proposed ordinance to the voters : Adopt a Resolution submitting the proposed ini5a5ve ordinance known as Measure M to the voters at the November 3, 2026, General Municipal Elec5on Consolidated with Napa County Pursuant to California Elec5ons Code Section 9215(b); or
Option 3 - Direct staff to prepare a report pursuant to Elec*ons Code Sec*on 9212: Adopt a Resolu5on ordering the prepara5on of a report pursuant to California Elec5ons Code section 9212 regarding the proposed initiative ordinance known as Measure M.

18. Citywide Circulation
Recommendation: Discussion on Citywide Circulation

19. City Council Committee Report - Councilmember David Oro

20. City Council Committee Report - Vice Mayor Mark Joseph

21. Future Agenda Items of Note

MANAGEMENT / STAFF ORAL REPORTS

CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS / COMMITTEE REPORTS
City Council may provide brief comments on ma-ers of public concern, announce ma-ers of public interest, and provide Council Committee reports. No action will be taken.

FUTURE AGENDA ITEM REVIEW
The City Council will review upcoming agenda items. Councilmembers may request that items be added to future City Council agendas.

ADJOURNMENT

CERTIFICATION
I, Taresa Geilfuss, City Clerk for American Canyon, do hereby declare that the foregoing agenda was posted in compliance with the Brown Act prior to the meeting date.

Taresa Geilfuss, City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA JUNE 2, 2026
4 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
This mee*ng is a limited public forum. The City expects respecFul conduct from all par*cipants.

Offensive language or discriminatory remarks based on any protected classifica*on under federal, state, or local law will not be tolerated, and the speaker may be immediately disconnected.

Mee5ngs are conducted in person and are also available via Zoom. Mee5ngs are broadcast live on Napa Valley TV, the City’s website, and YouTube.

Zoom Link: Click here. Webinar ID: 847 1017 1711. Passcode: 123456. Phone-in: (408) 638-0968 Oral Comments: In person during Open/Closed Session, or via Zoom during Open Session only. Use “Raise Your Hand” during public comment periods only.

Written Comments: Submit via eComments on the City’s Mee5ngs & Agendas webpage. eComments close at 3:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting.

Agenda Materials: Posted 72 hours in advance at www.americancanyon.gov.

ADA: Requests for accommoda5ons or alterna5ve formats must be submiFed at least three calendar days in advance to the City Clerk at 4381 Broadway, Suite 201, American Canyon, CA 94503 or [email protected].

Need Addi*onal Assistance? Contact the City Clerk by phone at (707) 647-4369 or by email at [email protected].

CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA JUNE 2, 2026
5 CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON

PROCLAMATION
June 2026 as PRIDE Month
WHEREAS, the City of American Canyon recognizes and proclaims the month of June 2026 as Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer (LGBTQ) “PRIDE Month” throughout American Canyon; and WHEREAS, the City of American Canyon observes PRIDE Month with a flag-raising ceremony to honor the history of the LGBTQ liberation movement and to support the rights of all citizens to experience equality and freedom from discrimination; and
WHEREAS, the rainbow flag is widely recognized as a symbol of pride, inclusion, and support for social movements that advocate for LGBTQ people within our community; and WHEREAS, all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. LGBTQ individuals have made immeasurable impacts on the cultural, civic, and economic successes of our country; and WHEREAS, the City of American Canyon is committed to supporting visibility, dignity, and equality for LGBTQ people in our diverse community; and
WHEREAS, while society at large increasingly supports LGBTQ equality, it is essential to acknowledge that the need for education and awareness remains vital to end discrimination and prejudice; and WHEREAS, celebrating PRIDE Month influences awareness and provides support and advocacy for the American Canyon LGBTQ community, and is an opportunity to act and engage in dialogue to strengthen alliances, build acceptance, and advance equal rights; and NOW, THEREFORE, I, Pierre Washington, Mayor of the City of American Canyon on behalf of the City Council, do hereby proclaim June 2026 as PRIDE Month and that the rainbow flag will be raised for the entire month of June in support of our LGBTQ community to recognize the influential and lasting contributions they continue to make in our vibrant community in which they live, work, and play.

Dated: June 2, 2026
________________________
Pierre Washington, Mayor
6 CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON

PROCLAMATION
Juneteenth Independence Day
WHEREAS, on January 1, 1863, President Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation, declaring all enslaved people in the rebellious states to be forever free; and WHEREAS, although the Emancipation Proclamation was signed in 1863, it was not until June 19, 1865, that Union soldiers arrived in Galveston, Texas, announcing the end of slavery in the South and the Southwestern United States; and
WHEREAS, Juneteenth, observed annually on June 19th, commemorates the end of slavery in the United States and honors the history, culture, resilience, and contributions of African Americans; and WHEREAS, Juneteenth is an opportunity to celebrate freedom, equality, and the enduring principles of the Declaration of Independence; and
WHEREAS, on June 10, 2026, in partnership with the American Canyon Arts Foundation, the American Canyon Chamber of Commerce, and the City of American Canyon, the community will celebrate Juneteenth during the Chamber’s “Meet Me in the Street” event, located on American Canyon Road from James Road to Elliott Drive and centered around Northampton Park; and
WHEREAS, this free community event celebrates African American heritage, history, and freedom through cultural ceremonies, live music, performances, and activities that reflect the power of community, family, art, and culture; and
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Pierre Washington, Mayor of the City of American Canyon, on behalf of the City Council, do proclaim June 19th, 2026, as Juneteenth Independence Day. In celebration of this day, I encourage the American Canyon community to attend the Juneteenth celebration on June 10, 2026, during the Chamber’s “Meet Me in the Street” event on American Canyon Road and at Northampton Park.

Dated: June 2, 2026
Pierre Washington, Mayor
7 HOUSING AUTHORITY REPORT ON

HOUSING SERVICES ACTIVITIES
2025-2026
8  The City of American Canyon annually contracts with the Housing Authority to provide a variety of housing
services.
 Housing Authority’s work program is designed to
provide:
◦ Countywide Activities: rental assistance and homeless services and projects.
◦ Base Housing Services: regulatory agreement monitoring, review development projects, loan servicing, & affordable housing regulatory agreements.
◦ Additional Housing Services: housing development financial analysis and other services mutually agreed upon.
9  Countywide Activities:
 Section 8 Housing Services
◦ Housing Authority administers $15 million Section
8 Housing Choice Voucher program
◦ 1158 rental assistance vouchers county wide
 154 American Canyon households receiving rental
assistance a 5% increase from 2024-2025
 12% all vouchers issued are being used in American
Canyon
 Includes 34 project-based vouchers for Valley View
Senior Apts. and 8 project-based vouchers Napa Cove
Apts. Of these 17 are VASH vouchers for chronically
homeless veterans.
10  Section 8 Housing Services-cont’d
◦ 13 of the 154 American Canyon Voucher holders
participate in the Family Self Sufficiency Program.
 Participants receive services & counseling to become
fully employed and independent.
◦ 6 American Canyon households received NEDS
vouchers.
◦ 6+10+ American Canyon households received FUP
vouchers.
11  Homelessness Services & Projects:
◦ Continuum of Care
 HACN represents the City at monthly committee
meetings
 Through a competitive application HUD renewed all
Continuum of Care grants this past year. Napa
County’s share is $973,104
 Funds are used to assist homeless population with
case management and rental assistance
12  Base Housing Services:
◦ Regulatory Agreement Monitoring:
 Annual for-sale affordable housing monitoring:
 Verify owner occupancy, insurance coverage, & property taxes are current.
 Annual rental project monitoring :
 Compliance review of City’s Affordable Housing
Agreements.
 Tenant income certifications & affordable unit count.  Compliance with Local Housing Preference Policy.
 Provided technical assistance with affordable housing properties
13  Base Housing Services:
◦ Loan Servicing:
 Conducted annual owner occupancy monitoring
of all first-time homebuyer and rehabilitation
loans.
 Verified homeowner insurance coverage and
property taxes and/or HCD title fees are paid
current.
 Responded to loan payoff and refinance and
subordination requests.
14  Additional Housing Services
◦ 2019 HOME grant for $1million was awarded to
continue the down payment assistance and
homeowner repair program.
◦ Maintained grant financial records for the HOME,
CDBG, CalHome, and BEGIN grants. Submitted
required quarterly & annual grant reporting to HCD.
15 CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING

ACTION MINUTES
May 19, 2026
5:30 P.M. CLOSED SESSION

CALL TO ORDER - CLOSED SESSION
The closed session was called to order at 5:30 p.m.

ROLL CALL - CLOSED SESSION

Present: Councilmember Brando Cruz, Councilmember Melissa Lamattina, Councilmember David Oro, Vice Mayor Mark Joseph, Mayor Pierre Washington

Absent: None

PUBLIC COMMENT - CLOSED SESSION ITEMS
Mayor Washington called for public comments on closed session matters. Written comments:
none. Oral Comments: none. The public comment period was closed.

MEETING RECESSED TO CLOSED SESSION

BUSINESS - CLOSED SESSION

1. Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation. Authorized pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1):
a. City of American Canyon v. City of Vallejo, et al. (Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 34- 2022-00327471).
b. City of Vallejo v. City of American Canyon et al. (Third District Court of Appeal Case No.

C102070; formerly Sacramento County Superior Court Case No. 23WM000055). c. City of Vallejo v. City of American Canyon et al. (Sacramento County Superior Court Case No. 24WM000078).
d. City of Vallejo v. City of American Canyon et al. (Marin County Superior Court Case No.

CV0003752).
e. American Canyon 1, LLC and Napa Valley Ruins & Gardens, LLC v. City of American Canyon et al. (Napa County Superior Court Case No. 25CV002277)

2. Conference with Legal Counsel – Anticipated Litigation. Authorized pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 (d)(2). One (1) Matter.
16 6:30 P.M. OPEN SESSION

CALL TO ORDER - OPEN SESSION
The City Council meeting was called to order at 6:37 p.m.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was recited.

ROLL CALL - OPEN SESSION

Present: Councilmember Brando Cruz, Councilmember Melissa Lamattina, Councilmember David Oro, Vice Mayor Mark Joseph, Mayor Pierre Washington

Absent: None

CLOSED SESSION REPORT OUT / CONFIRMATION OF REPORTABLE ACTION A report on Closed Session and confirmation of reportable action was given by City Attorney Matthew Summers.

PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS

3. Kid's Commerce - Presentation of Business Licenses
Council received a Kid's Commerce presentation from Chamber of Commerce President Valerie Zizak-Morais. Deputy City Clerk Nicolle Hall presented Kids Commerce participants with their business licenses.

4. Proclamation: National Public Works Week May 17- May 23, 2026 Mayor Washington announced the National Public Works Week May 17- May 23, 2026 proclamation. It was received by Public Works Director Erica Ahmann Smithies, Assistant Public Works Director Norman Woods and the Public Works team.

5. Proclamation: Water Safety Month May 2026
Mayor Washington announced the Water Safety Month May 2026 proclamation. It was received by Parks and Recreation Manager Alana Behn.

6. Proclamation: Memorial Day May 25, 2026
Mayor Washington announced the Memorial Day May 25, 2026, proclamation. It was received by Alana Behn, Hugh Marquez, Beth Marcus and the Memorial Day Committee. 17 PUBLIC COMMENT - ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA
Mayor Washington opened a public comment period. Written comments: none. Oral comments:

Janelle Sellick was called to speak; Justin Hamilton Hole was called to speak; Hugh Marquez was called to speak; Karen Fritz was called to speak. The public comment period was closed.

AGENDA CHANGES
Item 9.) South Kelly-Highway 29 Intersection Project Budget removed from the Consent Calendar and added to Business.

CONSENT CALENDAR
Action: Motion to adopt the CONSENT CALENDAR, excluding item 9, made by Councilmember David Oro, seconded by Vice Mayor Mark Joseph, and CARRIED by roll call vote.

Yea: Councilmember Brando Cruz, Councilmember Melissa Lamattina, Councilmember David Oro, Vice Mayor Mark Joseph, Mayor Pierre Washington Nay: None
Abstain: None

Absent: None

7. Minutes of May 5, 2026
Action: Approved the minutes of the Regular City Council meeting held May 5, 2026.

8. 2026 Military Equipment Inventory and Equipment Use Policy Action: Adopted Minute Order 2026-02 approving the 2026 Military Equipment Inventory and Equipment Use Policy.

10. Inspection Services for the Zone 5 Water Pump Station Project (WA25-0200) Action: Adopted Resolution 2026-33 authorizing the City Manager to enter into an agreement (Agreement 2026-80) with Coastland Civil Engineering, Inc. for construction inspection services for an amount not to exceed $250,000, in conjunction with the Zone 5 Water Pump Station Project (WA25-0200).

PUBLIC HEARINGS
There were no public hearings.

BUSINESS

9. South Kelly-Highway 29 Intersection Project Budget (Moved from Consent) Public Works Director Erica Ahmann Smithies responded to Council questions regarding the item.

Mayor Washington opened a public comment period. Written comments: none. Oral comments:

Justin Hamilton Hole was called to speak. The public comment period was closed. 18 Action: Motion to adopt Resolution 2026-32 amending the FY2025-26 Capital Budget and increasing the Project Budget from $1,145,000 to $5,605,000 in conjunction with the South Kelly-Highway 29 Intersection Project (TR23-0200) made by Councilmember David Oro, seconded by Vice Mayor Mark Joseph, and CARRIED by roll call vote.

Yea: Councilmember Brando Cruz, Councilmember Melissa Lamattina, Councilmember David Oro, Vice Mayor Mark Joseph, Mayor Pierre Washington Nay: None
Abstain: None

Absent: None

11. Budget Workshop and Fiscal Year 2026-27 Proposed Budget Council received a Budget Workshop report from Assistant City Manager Juan Gomez. Finance Director Jemelyn Cruz presented the Fiscal Year 2026-27 Proposed Budget. Mayor Washington opened a public comment period. Written comments: none. Oral comments: Beth Marcus was called to speak. The public comment period was closed. Council discussed the item.

12. Engineer's Report for Citywide LLAD Fiscal Year 26/27 The Council received a presentation on the Lighting Landscape Assessment District from Public Works Director Erica Ahmann Smithies. Mayor Washington opened a public comment period.

Written comments: none. Oral comments: none. The public comment period was closed.

Action: Motion to adopt Resolution 2026-34 setting a Public Hearing for the Fiscal Year 26/27 Annual Engineer's Report, for the Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District, to approve the budgets within the Engineer's Report, confirming the assessment diagrams and the annual assessment amounts, and authorizing the levy and collection of annual assessments for Fiscal Year 26/27 with the provision that staff send a letter to all LLAD members informing them of the June 2nd Public Hearing made by Councilmember Brando Cruz, seconded by Vice Mayor Mark Joseph, and CARRIED by roll call vote.

Yea: Councilmember Brando Cruz, Councilmember Melissa Lamattina, Councilmember David Oro, Vice Mayor Mark Joseph, Mayor Pierre Washington Nay: None
Abstain: None

Absent: None

MANAGEMENT / STAFF ORAL REPORTS
There were no Management/Staff Oral reports.

CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS / COMMITTEE REPORTS
The Mayor and council members provided oral reports and announced items of community interest. 19 13. City Council Committee Report - Councilmember David Oro

14. City Council Committee Report - Vice Mayor Mark Joseph

15. City Council Committee Report - Mayor Pierre Washington

FUTURE AGENDA ITEM REVIEW

16. Future Agenda Items of Note
Future agenda items were reviewed.

Action: Motion to add a study session of Citywide Traffic Flow and Emergency Traffic Planning to the June 2nd City Council meeting made by Councilmember David Oro, seconded by Vice Mayor Mark Joseph, and CARRIED by roll call vote.

Yea: Councilmember Brando Cruz, Councilmember Melissa Lamattina, Councilmember David Oro, Vice Mayor Mark Joseph, Mayor Pierre Washington Nay: None
Abstain: None

Absent: None

ADJOURNMENT
The City Council Meeting was adjourned at 8:58 p.m.

CERTIFICATION
Respectfully Submitted,
_____________________________________
Nicolle Hall, Deputy City Clerk
20 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
JUNE 2, 2026

STAFF REPORT

CONSENT
ITEM NUMBER: 6.

TITLE
Projects Funded by SB1/Road Maintenance and Rehabilita+on Account (RMRA) for Fiscal Year 2026/27

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a Resolu+on approving a list of projects for Fiscal Year 2026/27 funded by SB1: The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017.

CONTACT
Erica Ahmann Smithies, P.E., Public Works Director
Ron Ranada, P.E., Senior Civil Engineer

BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS
The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (commonly referred to as SB1) provides funding for road maintenance projects through the Road Maintenance and Rehabilita+on Account (RMRA). The RMRA requires annual repor+ng to the California Transporta+on Commission (CTC). The City is required to submit a list of poten+al projects to the CTC by July 1, 2026, in order to receive RMRA funds in FY 2026/27.

In order to comply with CTC requirements, the City must submit a list of only those streets anticipated to be funded with RMRA funds. The recommended project list is as follows:

Street Name Treatment
Green Island Road Maintenance Pavement Leveling Course and 3" Overlay The above street project represents only one of many streets proposed to be improved in FY 2026/27 with other funds such as Measure U. The RMRA funds do carryover from year to year, and any unused funds can be spent on other City funded projects in accordance with local needs and priorities so long as the projects are consistent with RMRA.

COUNCIL PRIORITY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS
Infrastructure: "Develop and maintain infrastructure resources to support sustainable growth." 21 FISCAL IMPACT
As of May 2026, the State RMRA revenue projec+ons for FY 2026/27 are $630,140. There is no addi+onal fiscal impact with the adop+on of the resolu+on approving the RMRA Project List for Fiscal Year 2026/27.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The procurement of RMRA funding is not a “Project” subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) because securing the funding is exempt under the defini+on of a “Project” in CEQA Guidelines Sec+on 15378(b)(3) in that it concerns a government funding mechanism or fiscal ac+vity that does not involve a non-exempt ac+vity that may result in a poten+ally significant physical impact on the environment. Further, the treatment of the exis+ng streets subject to the funding is exempt consistent with CEQA Guidelines sec+on 15301(c) – repair and maintenance of exis+ng streets and sidewalks, and CEQA Guidelines Sec+on 15302 – replacement or reconstruc+on of exis+ng facili+es where the new facili+es are located at the same site and will have substan+ally the same purpose and capacity as the facilities being replaced.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution - Approving RMRA 26-27 Project List
Exhibit A - RMRA 26-27 Project List
22 RESOLUTION NO. 2026-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON ADOPTING A LIST OF PROJECTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026/27 FUNDED BY
SB1: THE ROAD REPAIR AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017
WHEREAS, Senate Bill 1 (SB 1), the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (Chapter 5, Statutes of 2017) was passed by the Legislature and Signed into law by the Governor in April 2017 to address the significant multi-modal transportation funding shortfalls statewide; and WHEREAS, SB 1 includes accountability and transparency provisions that will ensure the residents of our City are aware of the projects proposed for funding in our community and which projects have been completed each fiscal year; and
WHEREAS, the City must adopt by resolution a list of projects proposed to receive fiscal year funding from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA), created by SB1, which must include a description and the location of each proposed project, a proposed schedule for the project’s completion, and the estimated useful life of the improvement; and
WHEREAS, the City, will receive an estimated $630,140 in RMRA funding in FY 2026/27 from SB1; and WHEREAS, this is the tenth year in which the City is receiving SB 1 funding and will enable the City to continue essential road maintenance and rehabilitation projects, safety improvements, repairing and replacing aging bridges, and increasing access and mobility options for the traveling public that would not have otherwise been possible without SB1; and
WHEREAS, the City has undergone a robust public process to ensure public input into our community’s transportation priorities/the project list; and
WHEREAS, the City used a Pavement Management System to assist in developing the SB 1 project list to ensure revenues are being used on the most high-priority and cost-effective projects that also meet the community’s priorities for transportation investment; and WHEREAS, the funding from SB 1 will help the City maintain and rehabilitate streets, roads, bridges, add active transportation infrastructure throughout the City this year and similar projects into the future; and WHEREAS, the 2023 California Statewide Local Streets and Roads Needs Assessment found that the City’s streets and roads are in an at-risk condition and this revenue will help the City increase the overall quality of our road system and over the next decade will bring our streets and roads into a good to excellent condition; and
WHEREAS, the SB 1 project list and overall investment in our local streets and roads infrastructure with a focus on basic maintenance and safety, investing in complete streets infrastructure, and using cuttingedge technology, materials and practices, will have significant positive co-benefits statewide and; WHEREAS, prior to receiving funds for FY 2026/27, the City is required to submit a list of potential projects to the California Transportation Commission; and
23 2
WHEREAS, those streets anticipated to be repaired with SB 1 funds are identified in Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, budget for the list of street repairs located in Exhibit A will be incorporated into the recommendations for the FY 2026/27 Operations Budget.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of American Canyon adopts the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account Project List for FY 2026/27 RMRA Revenues, as shown in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part thereof.

PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council of the City of American Canyon held on the 2nd day of June, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
____________________________
Pierre Washington, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVE AS TO FORM:
____________________________ _____________________________ Taresa Geilfuss, CMC, City Clerk Matthew Summers, City Attorney 24 Exhibit A
Project Title Description Location Funding Source Components Linear Feet Engineers Estimate Estimated Start Estimated Completion Estimated Useful Life Green Island Road Maintenance
Pavement leveling course and 3" overlay
Green Island Road, beginning approximately 650' north of Mezzetta Court, headed west RMRA Construction 800 235,000 $ Jul-26 Aug-26 5 years
Total Total 800 235,000 $
City of American Canyon
Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA)
Fiscal Year 2026-27 Project List
25 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
JUNE 2, 2026

STAFF REPORT

CONSENT
ITEM NUMBER: 7.

TITLE
Construction Contract Award for the Green Island Road Maintenance Project (PW26-0100)

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a Resolu.on awarding a construc.on contract to O.C. Jones & Sons, Inc. in the amount of $140,070 and authorizing the Public Works Director to approve Contract Change Orders in an aggregate amount not to exceed $220,000, in conjunc.on with the Green Island Road Maintenance Project (PW26-0100).

CONTACT
Erica Ahmann Smithies, P.E., Public Works Director
Ron Ranada, P.E., Senior Civil Engineer

BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS
The Green Island Road Reconstruc.on and Widening Project (TR16-0700) is currently underway, with comple.on an.cipated for this calendar year. The roads that are being improved within the industrial area include Green Island Road (from Paoli Loop to Jim Oswalt Way), Jim Oswalt Way, Mezzetta Court, Commerce Boulevard (north of North Slough), and Hanna Drive.

Due to various limi.ng factors including but not limited to funding and Project scope boundaries, certain roads within the industrial area could not be included for rehabilita.on. One such area is the sec.on of Green Island Road that is further west and beyond Mezze>a Court/Jim Oswalt Way.

Por.ons of the road are significantly deteriorated and are prone to failures such as severe potholes.

The City's Streets Division has done its best to carry out extensive spot repairs, but deteriora.on con.nues and is to such an extent that claims for vehicle damages have arisen in recent years.

Hence, staff developed a plan to implement a more comprehensive and substan.al repair and maintenance plan involving asphalt overlay to mitigate the deterioration.

In accordance with California Uniform Public Construc.on Cost Accoun.ng Act (CUPCCAA) procedures, City staff solicited proposals via the informal bidding process. Three proposals were received, with the results tabulated as follows:

BIDDER

TOTAL BID, INCLUDING ADD ALT FOR PAVING
FABRIC
26 ARGONAUT CONSTRUCTURS $236,080
COASTSIDE CONCRETE $288,578
O.C. JONES & SONS, INC. $140,070
Staff reviewed all bids and determined each to be both responsive and responsible. The rela.vely significant delta of the lowest bid from O.C. Jones is owed to their involvement with the Green Island Road Project, from which they are able to gain at least significant efficiencies in mobiliza.on costs.

Staff recommends awarding the contract to O.C. Jones & Sons, Inc.

COUNCIL PRIORITY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS
Infrastructure: "Develop and maintain infrastructure resources to support sustainable growth."

FISCAL IMPACT
The FY25-26 CIP Budget was amended at mid-year to increase the Streets Maintenance Budget by $285,000. Of this amount, $235,000 was to be dedicated to the aforemen.oned maintenance effort on Green Island Road. To deliver this work, the Green Island Road Maintenance Project (PW26- 0100) was created.

It should be noted that the work area associated with the ini.al request for bids was iden.fied as the 'must-do' area. It is the area that is most deteriorated and has the highest risk for produc.on claims. However, since O.C. Jones' bid leaves available funding to expand the work area, staff desires to nego.ate with the contractor further to maximize the area to be maintained. Hence, staff recommends authorizing the Public Works Director to approve Contract Change Orders in an aggregate amount not to exceed $220,000, in conjunc.on with the Green Island Road Maintenance Project (PW26-0100).

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
15301 - The Project is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") under the Class 1 exemp.on of exis.ng facili.es of Sec.on 15301 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regula.ons and said exemp.on is not negated by any excep.on under Sec.on 15300.2 of said Regulations.

COMMUNICATION
Level 0: No Further Public Communication Needed
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution - GIR Maintenance Award OC Jones

2. GIR Maintenance Plan
27 RESOLUTION NO. 2026-
RESOLUTION AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO O.C. JONES & SONS, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $140,070, AND AUTHORIZING THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TO APPROVE CONTRACT CHANGE ORDERS IN AN AGGREGATE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $220,000 IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE GREEN ISLAND ROAD MAINTENANCE PROJECT (PW26-0100)
WHEREAS, portions of Green Island Road are significantly deteriorated, and have become a source of potential claims for damages to vehicles; and
WHEREAS, the FY25-26 Budget provides for an allocation of $235,000 to the Streets Maintenance Budget to carry out pavement maintenance on Green Island Road; and WHEREAS, the Green Island Road Maintenance Project (PW26-0100) was created to provide for pavement maintenance to the portions of Green Island Road that are not with the Green Island Road Reconstruction and Widening Project (TR16-0700); and
WHEREAS, bids were solicited in accordance with California Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act (CUPCCAA) procedures; and
WHEREAS, the lowest responsive and responsible bid was submitted by O.C. Jones & Sons, Inc. (O.C.

Jones) in the amount of $140,070; and
WHEREAS, staff desires to maximize the utilization of the budgeted amount by expanding the areas to be treated via further negotiation with O.C. Jones.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of American Canyon hereby awards a construction contract to O.C. Jones & Sons, Inc. in the amount of $140,070, and authorizes the Public Works Director to approve and execute contract change orders in an aggregate amount not to exceed $220,000, in conjunction with the Green Island Road Maintenance Project (PW26-0100).

PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council of the City of American Canyon held on the 2nd day of June, 2026 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
JUNE 2, 2026

STAFF REPORT

CONSENT
ITEM NUMBER: 8.

TITLE
Napa Pasture Protein Grazing Agreement Amendment No. 2

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a Resolu'on authorizing the City Manager to enter into Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 2024-71 with Napa Pasture Protein, increasing the contract amount $128,000, for a total amount not to exceed $364, 000 for Fiscal Year 26/27 citywide grazing.

CONTACT
Erica Ahmann Smithies, P.E., Public Works Director

BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS
On May 21, 2024, City Council awarded Napa Pasture Protein Agreement No. 2024-71 for citywide grazing in Fiscal Year 2024/25 with the op'on to renew on an annual basis for up to four addi'onal years based on budget appropria'ons. The grazing contract included funding from Napa Firewise with their commitment to fund a second year. City staff including the Fire District see the grazing program as successful and recommends renewing the contract a second year.

The overall goal of the program is to improve defensible space of the surrounding residen'al areas by reducing the fire load and forest understory as well as taking a more sustainable approach in vegeta'on management for the City. The sheep are not only able to get into areas that City work forces would not have been able to access without regulatory permits, they also have brought regular positive feedback from around the community.

Napa Pasture Protein's proposal will con'nue to include a dedicated herd of animals, that may consist of sheep, goats, and a livestock guardian animal or two, to graze approximately 218+ acre of the open space and park areas as iden'fied on the a@ached maps. The herd will follow a path grazing from space to space in a rota'onal method throughout the year. They will pass through some of the spaces mul'ple 'mes per year, to control the vegeta'on for ecological health, fire safety, and for safe public usage.

When grazing sites have mul'ple passes, the benefits are greater noxious weed control, decreased fire fuels, and improved soil health. This is due in part to the benefits achieved during different seasons and vegeta'on phases. Addi'onal benefits include improved carbon sequestering, 30 decreased surface water loss, and improved wildlife habitats.

COUNCIL PRIORITY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS
Outdoors and Recrea'on: "Expand opportuni'es for use of outdoor recrea'on and an ac've and healthy lifestyle."

FISCAL IMPACT
The 2024 proposal for the citywide grading contract was for $218,000 with op'ons to renew on an annual basis up to 5 years based on future budget appropria'ons. Napa Firewise contracted directly with Napa Pasture Protein for $100,000 with the City contribu'ng the remaining $118,000 for Fiscal Year 2024/25.

On June 3, 2025, City Council authorized Amendment No. 1 for Fiscal Year 2025/26 for an amount of $118,000 to con'nue the grazing contract through June 30, 2026. Napa Firewise contributed $100,000.

Napa Firewise commi@ed to a third year of funding for Fiscal Year 2026/27 but at a reduced amount of $90,000 meaning the City's contribu'ons for Fiscal Year 2026/27 will increase to $128,000 to continue the grazing contract of $218,000 through June 30, 2027.

Napa Pasture Protein has divided the en're contract amount of $218,000 to be spread out over a 12-month period so the City's expenditures are an'cipated to begin in September 2025 therefore a budget appropriation is not needed at this time to renew the contract.

Funding for Amendment No. 2 is included in the proposed FY 2026/27 Budget. The funding source for this contract will be split among mul'ple opera'ons as the grazing will be taking place on City open spaces located at various facili'es, parks, right of way and watershed areas. The FY2026/27 budget will be allocated through the following funding sources:

Fund 210 Measure A
Fund 261, LLAD Zone 1
Fund 262, LLAD Zone 2
Fund 252, Newell Open Space
Fund 100, General Fund.

Fund 540, Wastewater Enterprise

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
15378(b) - The ac'on is not a "Project" subject to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") because it does not qualify as a "Project" under Public Resources Code Sec'ons 21065 and 21080 and in Section 15378(b) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.

COMMUNICATION
31 Level 0: No Further Public Communication Needed
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution: Grazing Amendment 2
32 RESOLUTION NO. 2026-
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO AGREEMENT NO. 2024-71 WITH NAPA PASTURE PROTEIN, INCREASING THE CONTRACT AMOUNT $128,000, FOR A TOTAL AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $364,000 FOR FISCAL YEAR 26/27 CITYWIDE GRAZING WHEREAS, on May 21, 2024, City Council awarded Napa Pasture Protein Agreement No. 2024-71 for citywide grazing in Fiscal Year 2024/25 with the option to renew on an annual basis for up to four additional years based on budget appropriations; and
WHEREAS, on June 3, 2025, City Council approved Amendment No. 1, Agreement No. 2025-76 to renew for year two for citywide grazing in Fiscal Year 2025/26; and WHEREAS, the overall goal of the program is to improve defensible space of the surrounding residential areas by reducing the fire load and forest understory as well as taking a more sustainable approach in vegetation management for the City; and
WHEREAS, City staff including the Fire District see the grazing program as successful and recommend renewing the contract a third year; and
WHEREAS, Napa Firewise has committed $90,000 for a third year of grazing and has contracted directly with Napa Pasture Protein; and
WHEREAS, Amendment No. 2 is for an amount of $128,000 to complete a third year of citywide grazing for Fiscal Year 2026/27; and
WHEREAS, funding for the third year of citywide grazing has been included in the proposed Fiscal Year 2026/27 Budget in the amount of $128,000 from the following fund accounts: Fund 210, Measure A; Fund 261, LLAD Zone 1; Fund 262, LLAD Zone 2; Fund 252, Newell Open Space; Fund 100, Parks and Streets Maintenance; and Fund 540, Environmental Compliance.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of American Canyon hereby authorizesthe City Manager to enter into Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 2024-71 with Napa Pasture Protein, increasing the contract amount $128,000, for a total amount not to exceed $364, 000 for Fiscal Year 26/27 citywide grazing.

PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council of the City of American Canyon held on the 2nd day of June, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
____________________________
Pierre Washington, Mayor
33 2
ATTEST: APPROVE AS TO FORM
____________________________ _____________________________ Taresa Geilfuss, CMC, City Clerk Matthew T. Summers, City Attorney 34 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
JUNE 2, 2026

STAFF REPORT

BUSINESS
ITEM NUMBER: 9.

TITLE
Janitorial Services Agreement

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a Resolu(on authorizing the City Manager to enter into an agreement with Karla's Janitorial & Suppliers LLC for janitorial services for a term of one (1) year with an op(on for the City Manager to extend for one (1) year for two (2) additional years.

CONTACT
Erica Ahmann Smithies, P.E., Public Works Director
Brian Materne, Superintendent
Noni Thomas, Management Analyst

BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS
Janitorial services are a necessity throughout city owned facili(es to maintain the cleanliness, health and safety of the community and staff. Currently, the Public Works Department has one employee for the Building Maintenance division that must carry out all day-to-day and specialty maintenance, which makes it necessary to contract out janitorial services.

In February 2025 staff posted a Request for Proposals through OpenGov, the City's procurement portal. Through that process there were mul(ple proposals received and the city went with a different vendor for a one-year contract. That vendor has completed the term of their ini(al contract and will not be renewed. In an effort to maintain the services of a janitorial provider, several of the remaining vendors were contacted to update and resubmit their bids. Of the vendors contacted and of the three (3) bids received, Karla's Janitorial & Suppliers, LLC was the lowest responsible bidder.

Staff recommends contrac(ng with Karla's Janitorial & Suppliers, LLC as they were the lowest and most responsible proposer. The contract term would be for one (1) year with two (2) one (1) year extensions to be approved by the City Manager. The total annual contract would be for $128,095 which includes special event pricing.

COUNCIL PRIORITY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS
Organizational Effectiveness: "Deliver exemplary government services." 35 FISCAL IMPACT
Staff es(mates from the bid that the amount for the first year of the agreement should not exceed $128,095 including addi(onal costs of special events cleaning and deep cleaning. Funds were budgeted in the ISF Building Maintenance fund 651-50-535-42190.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
15378(b) - The ac(on is not a "Project" subject to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") because it does not qualify as a "Project" under Public Resources Code Sec(ons 21065 and 21080 and in Section 15378(b) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.

COMMUNICATION
Level 0: No Further Public Communication Needed
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution: Karla's Janitorial Agreement
Exhibit A: Cost Proposal Karla's Janitorial
36 RESOLUTION NO. 2026-
AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH KARLA’S JANITORIAL & SUPPLIERS, LLC FOR JANITORIAL SERVICES FOR A TERM OF ONE (1) YEAR WITH AN OPTION FOR THE CITY MANAGER TO EXTEND FOR ONE (1) YEAR FOR TWO (2) ADDITIONAL YEARS WHEREAS, a contract for janitorial services is necessary to maintain the cleanliness and upkeep of city facilities; and
WHEREAS, the existing contract for janitorial services expires on June 30, 2026; and WHEREAS, the city posted a request for proposals in February 2025 and received eight proposals, and the next qualified vendors were contacted to resubmit bids; and WHEREAS, Karla’s Janitorial & Suppliers LLC resubmitted their bid and was the lowest responsible proposer at a cost of $128,095 for a one-year term, including allowances for special event pricing at an average of 48 events per year; and
WHEREAS, the funding is budgeted within the Building Maintenance Support Services ISF fund (651).

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to enter into an agreement with Karla’s Janitorial & Suppliers LLC for a term of one (1) year, July 1, 2026 to June 30, 2027, with options of two (2) one year extensions to be authorized by the City Manager.

PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council of the City of American Canyon held on the 2nd day of June, 2026 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

3. Contract Proposal

JANITORIAL SERVICES
TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON:

Pursuant to and in compliance with the Notice Inviting Bids and other CONTRACT DOCUMENTS relating thereto, the Bidder, being fully familiar with the terms of the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, local conditions affecting the performance of the Agreement, the character, quality, quantities and scope of the work, and the cost of the work at the place of performance, hereby proposes and agrees, within the time stipulated in the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, to furnish to City all services and all other items necessary to conduct and complete said work, all in strict conformity with the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, including Addenda on file for the total sum provided which is in agreement to the unit prices set in the Bid Schedule, hereinafter set forth.

FACILITY MONTHLY COST
Line Item Description Quantity Unit of
Measure
Unit Cost Total
1 City Hall 5 Week
1 Recreation Center 4 Week
1 Adult Activity Center 5 Week
1 Community Center 3 Week
1 Recreation/Pool Offices 3 Week
1 Corporation Yard 2 Week
1 Water Reclamation Facility 2 Week
1 Water Treatment Plant 1 Week
1 Police Department 5 Week
TOTAL

DEEP CLEANING COST
Deep cleanings are to be performed on an annual basis.
2,496.00 29,952.00
601.12 7,213.44
1,508.00 18,096.00
919.36 11,032.32
574.60 6,895.20
636.48 7,637.76
676.00 8,112.00
353.60 4,243.20
1,456.00 17,472.00
$110,653.92
38 14
Line Item Description Quantity Unit of
Measure
Unit Cost Total
1 City Hall 3 Year
1 Recreation Center 3 Year
1 Adult Activity Center 3 Year
1 Community Center 2 Year
1 Recreation/Pool Offices 3 Year
1 Corporation Yard 2 Year
1 Water Reclamation Facility 2 Year
1 Water Treatment Plant 2 Year
1 Police Department 4 Year
1 City Hall Restrooms 6 Year
TOTAL

4. Insurance Requirements

1. This is a Summary of Insurance Requirements for this project. By agreeing to perform the work or submitting a bid, you verify that you comply with and agree to be bound by these requirements. If any additional Contract documents are executed, the actual Indemnity language and Insurance Requirements may include additional provisions as deemed appropriate by the City.

2. You should check with your Insurance advisors to verify compliance and determine if additional coverages or limits may be needed to adequately insure your obligations under this agreement. These are the minimum required and do not in any way represent or imply that such coverage is sufficient to adequately cover the Contractor’s liability under this agreement. The full coverage and limits afforded under Contractor’s policies of Insurance shall be available to the City and these Insurance Requirements shall not in any way act to reduce coverage that is broader or includes higher limits than those required.

3. If non-standard Insurance forms are used rather than the standard Insurance Services Office (ISO) forms shown, Contractor agrees to pay City for an Independent Expert evaluation and opinion as needed to determine whether or not they are at least equivalent in coverage to the standard ISO forms. The charge shall be $150 for each non-standard endorsement and $575 for each non-standard policy.
1,404.00 4,212.00
728.00 2,184.00
832.00 1,664.00
572.00 1,716.00
572.00 1,144.00
140.40 842.40
707.20 1,414.40
286.00 572.00
572.00 2,288.00
$17,440.80
468.00 1,404.00
39 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
JUNE 2, 2026

STAFF REPORT

CONSENT
ITEM NUMBER: 10.

TITLE
Calling the Municipal Election and Consolidating the Election with Napa County

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a Resolu(on calling and giving no(ce of a Municipal Elec(on to be held in the City of American Canyon on November 3, 2026, and reques(ng consolida(on of said elec(on with the Statewide General Election and requesting election services from the County of Napa.

CONTACT
Taresa Geilfuss, CMC, City Clerk

BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS
The City of American Canyon will conduct a Municipal Elec(on on November 3, 2026, in conjunc(on with the Statewide General Elec(on, for the purpose of elec(ng two members of the City Council to full four-year terms. Pursuant to California Elec(ons Code requirements, the City Council must formally call the elec(on and request consolida(on with the statewide elec(on conducted by the County of Napa.

Consolida(on with the Statewide General Elec(on allows the City to u(lize the Napa County Elec(ons Division for elec(on administra(on services, including voter registra(on services, ballot prepara(on, vote-by-mail processing, vote center opera(ons, canvassing, and cer(fica(on of elec(on results. Conduc(ng the Municipal Elec(on in conjunc(on with the statewide elec(on promotes administra(ve efficiency, reduces overall elec(on costs, and provides consistency for voters through a single coordinated election process.

Elec(ons Code sec(on 10403 authorizes a city elec(on to be consolidated with a statewide elec(on conducted on the same date upon approval of the county board of supervisors. Elec(ons Code sec(on 10002 further authorizes the County Elec(ons Official to provide elec(on services to the City under agreed terms and reimbursement provisions.

Adop(on of the proposed resolu(on formally calls the November 3, 2026 Municipal Elec(on, requests consolida(on with the Statewide General Elec(on, and authorizes the Napa County Elections Division to provide election services necessary to conduct the election. 40 COUNCIL PRIORITY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS
Organizational Effectiveness: "Deliver exemplary government services."

FISCAL IMPACT
The cost of a consolidated elec(on is generally based on the number of en((es appearing on the ballot, the number of offices to be filled, and the number of ballot measures submi<ed. The proposed Fiscal Year 2026–27 Budget is an(cipated to include funding for the City’s November 3, 2026, Municipal Elec(on based on a cost es(mate of $85,000 provided by the Napa County Elec(ons Division.

Pursuant to the proposed resolu(on, the city will reimburse the County of Napa for elec(on services provided in connection with the consolidated election.

COMMUNICATION
Level 0: No Further Public Communication Needed
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution - Call and Consolidate
41 RESOLUTION NO. ____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF A MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 3, 2026,

REQUESTING CONSOLIDATION OF SAID ELECTION WITH THE STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION,

AND REQUESTING ELECTION SERVICES FROM THE COUNTY OF NAPA WHEREAS, pursuant to the laws of the State of California relating to general law cities and the American Canyon Municipal Code, a Municipal Election is required to be held on November 3, 2026, for the election of certain municipal officers; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of American Canyon desires to call and give notice of said Municipal Election pursuant to the California Elections Code; and WHEREAS, it is desirable that the Municipal Election be consolidated with the Statewide General Election to be held on November 3, 2026, and that within the City of American Canyon the precincts, vote centers, polling places, election officers, and election procedures be the same; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires that the Napa County Elections Division canvass the returns of the Municipal Election and that the election be conducted in all respects as though there were only one election.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Election Called.

Pursuant to the requirements of the laws of the State of California relating to general law cities, a Municipal Election is hereby called and ordered to be held in the City of American Canyon on Tuesday, November 3, 2026, for the purpose of electing two (2) members of the City Council for full four-year terms.

Section 2. Ballots.

The ballots to be used at the election shall be in the form and content required by law.

Section 3. Request for Election Services.

Pursuant to Elections Code section 10002, the City Council hereby requests that the Napa County Board of Supervisors authorize the Napa County Elections Official to provide election services to the City of American Canyon for the consolidated election, including but not limited to the following:
a) Provide vote centers, polling places, ballot drop boxes, and election officers, and establish compensation for such services;
b) Provide for the receipt, processing, and counting of vote-by-mail ballots; c) Furnish precinct supplies, indices, training, and related election materials and services; d) Procure and furnish official ballots, notices, printed matter, equipment, and all supplies necessary to lawfully conduct the election;
e) Conduct the central counting of ballots, count write-in votes, and conduct the official canvass of the election returns;
42 f) Certify the results and provide all required post-election services and materials; g) Perform all other services and take all actions necessary for the conduct of the election as may be requested by the City; and
h) Provide the City with an itemized invoice for services provided.

Section 4. Notice of Election.

Notice of the time and place of holding the election is hereby given, and the City Clerk is authorized, instructed, and directed to give further or additional notice of the election in the time, form, and manner required by law.

Section 5. Request for Consolidation.

Pursuant to Elections Code section 10403, the Napa County Board of Supervisors is hereby requested to consent and agree to the consolidation of the City of American Canyon Municipal Election with the Statewide General Election to be held on November 3, 2026.

Section 6. Canvass and Conduct of Election.

The Napa County Elections Division is authorized to canvass the returns of the election. The election shall be held and conducted in all respects as if there were only one election, and only one form of ballot shall be used. The election shall be conducted in accordance with the provisions of law regulating the Statewide General Election.

Section 7. Reimbursement of Costs.

The City of American Canyon recognizes that additional costs will be incurred by the County of Napa by reason of this consolidation and agrees to reimburse the County for all costs related to the election services provided that are not otherwise reimbursed by the State of California.

Section 8. Filing of Resolution.

The City Clerk is hereby directed to file certified copies of this Resolution with the Napa County Board of Supervisors and the Napa County Elections Division.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of American Canyon held on the 2nd day of June 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
___________________________________
Pierre Washington, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________ ___________________________________ Taresa Geilfuss, City Clerk Matthew Summers, City Attorney 43 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
JUNE 2, 2026

STAFF REPORT

CONSENT
ITEM NUMBER: 11.

TITLE
Measure M Initiative Petition - Certification of Sufficiency

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a Resolu)on accep)ng the Clerks Cer)ficate of Ini)a)ve Pe))on submi0ed by the Napa County Registrar of Voters and acknowledging the qualifica)on of the ini)a)ve pe))on en)tled “Ini)a)ve Measure to Amend American Canyon 2040 General Plan Mobility Element to Add Watson Lane/Marcus Road Circula)on Connec)on Between State Route 29 and Newell Drive”under the California Elections Code.

CONTACT
Taresa Geilfuss, CMC, City Clerk

BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS
On April 3, an Oakland based developer (McGrath Proper)es) submi0ed a No)ce of Intent for an ini)a)ve measure en)tled “Ini)a)ve Measure to Amend American Canyon 2040 General Plan Mobility Element to Add Watson Lane/Marcus Road Circula)on Connec)on Between State Route 29 and Newell Drive” to the City Clerk/Elec)ons Official. The No)ce included wri0en text of the proposed initiative (Measure "M") and requested preparation of a ballot title and summary pursuant to the EC Section 9203.

On April 15, the official ballot )tle and summary as prepared by the City A0orney were transmi0ed to the proponents.

On May 18, an a0orney represen)ng the developer submi0ed signed pe))ons to the City Clerk's office for filing.

In accordance with EC Sec)on 9210, when the pe))on was presented for filing the designated City Elections Official completed all of the following:
a. Ascertained the number of registered voters of the city last reported by the county elec)ons official to the Secretary of State pursuant to Sec)on 2187 effec)ve at the )me the no)ce was published. Based on the number of registered voters, 1,445 valid signatures were required for the initiative petition to qualify, and
44 b. Determined the total number of signatures affixed to the pe))on. Following the examina)on, it was determined that the number of signatures, prima facia, was equal or in excess of the minimum amount required, and the pe))on was accepted and deemed as filed on May 20, 2026.

The pe))on was delivered to the Napa County Registrar of Voters for signature verifica)on (EC Sec)on 9211). They determined the pe))on sec)ons contained 2,294 signatures, then conducted a random sample examina)on of the submi0ed signatures (EC Sec)on 9115). Although a sample of 500 signatures was examined, only 396 signatures were determined to be valid. However, the resul)ng projec)on of valid signatures (1,817) exceeds the minimum threshold (1,445) required for qualification.

On May 26, 2026, the Napa County Registrar of Voters transmi0ed to the City Elec)ons Official the Clerk's Cer)ficate to Ini)a)ve Pe))on (Resolu)on Exhibit A) verifying that a sufficient number of valid signatures had been collected.

The Elec)ons Official is required present the pe))on for acceptance by City Council at its next regular mee)ng (EC Sec)on 9215). Adop)on of the proposed resolu)on formally accepts the Clerks Cer)ficate to Ini)a)ve Pe))on submi0ed by the Napa County Registrar of Voters and acknowledges qualification of the initiative petition under the California Elections Code.

Next Steps
Pursuant to EC Sec)on 9215, Council will consider their Measure M op)ons as part of a separate Business matter on this agenda.

COUNCIL PRIORITY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS
Not applicable.

FISCAL IMPACT
The cost for the Napa County Registrar of Voters to validate the signatures on the ini)a)ve pe))on is $325. Future fiscal impacts associated with the ini)a)ve measure, including costs related to elec)ons, legal review, environmental analysis, or implementa)on, will depend upon future City Council actions and applicable Elections Code requirements.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
15378(b) - The ac)on is not a "Project" subject to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") because it does not qualify as a "Project" under Public Resources Code Sec)ons 21065 and 21080 and in Section 15378(b) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.

COMMUNICATION
Level 3: Broad Communication
The latest informa)on about Measure M can be found on the Elec)on's Central page of the Virtual 45 City Hall(https://www.americancanyon.gov/Work/Local-Government/City-Hall/City-Clerk/ElectionsCentral).

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution - Accepting the Certification of Measure M Exhibit A - Clerks Certificate to Initiative Petition
46 RESOLUTION NO. 2026-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON

ACCEPTING THE CLERKS CERTIFICATE OF INITIATIVE PETITION SUBMITTED BY THE NAPA COUNTY

REGISTRAR OF VOTERS AND ACKNOWLEDGING THE QUALIFICATION OF THE INITIATIVE PETITION ENTITLED “INITIATIVE MEASURE TO AMEND AMERICAN CANYON 2040 GENERAL PLAN MOBILITY ELEMENT TO ADD WATSON LANE/MARCUS ROAD CIRCULATION CONNECTION BETWEEN STATE ROUTE 29 AND NEWELL DRIVE” UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ELECTIONS CODE.

WHEREAS, proponents of an initiative measure entitled “Initiative Measure to Amend American Canyon 2040 General Plan Mobility Element to Add Watson Lane/Marcus Road Circulation Connection Between State Route 29 and Newell Drive” submitted a Notice of Intention and written text of the proposed initiative measure to the City Clerk and requested preparation of a ballot title and summary pursuant to the California Elections Code; and
WHEREAS, the City Attorney thereafter prepared and provided an official ballot title and summary for the proposed initiative measure for use in publication and circulation of the petition; and WHEREAS, the City Clerk contacted the Napa County Registrar of Voters to determine the number of registered voters within the City of American Canyon pursuant to Elections Code section 9210, and determined that the number of signatures required for qualification of the initiative petition was 1,445 valid signatures; and
WHEREAS, proponents filed the initiative petition with the City Elections Official, and the petition was thereafter transmitted to the Napa County Registrar of Voters for signature examination and verification pursuant to Elections Code section 9211; and
WHEREAS, the Napa County Registrar of Voters conducted a random sample examination of the signatures submitted on the petition in accordance with Elections Code section 9115; and WHEREAS, the Registrar of Voters determined that the petition contained 2,294 signatures, of which 500 signatures were examined and 396 signatures were determined to be valid, resulting in a projected valid signature count of 1,817 signatures; and
WHEREAS, the projected valid signature count exceeds the minimum number of signatures required for qualification pursuant to Elections Code sections 9115 and 9215; and WHEREAS, on May 26, 2026, the Napa County Registrar of Voters deemed the initiative petition as sufficient and transmitted the Clerks Certificate to Initiative Petition to the City Elections Official, attached hereto as Exhibit “A”; and
WHEREAS, Elections Code section 9215 requires that the certificate be presented to City Council at its next regular meeting following receipt by the City Elections Official.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of American Canyon as follows:

Section 1. The City Council hereby accepts the Clerks Certificate to Initiative Petition of the Napa County Registrar of Voters regarding the initiative petition entitled “Initiative Measure to Amend American Canyon 2040 General Plan Mobility Element to Add Watson Lane/Marcus Road Circulation Connection Between State 47 Route 29 and Newell Drive,” attached hereto as Exhibit “A.” and acknowledges the qualification of said petition under the California Elections Code.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of American Canyon held on the 2nd day of June 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
JUNE 2, 2026

STAFF REPORT

CONSENT
ITEM NUMBER: 12.

TITLE
Water Reclamation Facility Sludge Hauling and Biosolids Project Budget Amendment

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a Resolu+on amending the FY2025-26 Capital Budget and increasing the FY2025-26 Project Budget from $620,000 to $1,220,000 and authorizing the Public Works Director to execute contract change orders in an aggregate amount not to exceed the Project Budget, in conjunc+on with the Sludge Removal and Hauling Project (WW26-0400).

CONTACT
Erica Ahmann Smithies, P.E., Public Works Director
Norman Woods, Assistant Public Works Director, Utilities and Environmental Services

BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS
Background
The Water Reclama+on Facility (WRF), commissioned in 2002, includes two sludge ponds: one lined with clay and the other with a Hypalon synthe+c liner. From its incep+on through 2006, the claylined pond served as the primary site for sludge disposal. Since that +me, it has been repurposed for temporary wet weather storage and as a backup during sludge transfer and dewatering operations when the primary pond is unavailable.

Currently, the WRF generates approximately one dry ton of solids per day, which are deposited into the Hypalon-lined pond (Sludge Pond One). By 2011, this pond had reached its capacity, promp+ng the facility’s first sludge removal project. In the years following, effec+ve diges+on and dewatering allowed for biosolids removal on a biennial basis. Subsequent upgrades—including the installa+on of a screw press in 2015 and implementa+on of the Blue Frog sludge reduc+on system in 2018— have significantly improved sludge management efficiency and helped maintain stable pond levels since 2013.

A recent sludge depth survey indicated that Sludge Pond One contains approximately eleven feet of accumulated solids, out of a total opera+onal capacity of fiEeen feet. To preserve cri+cal treatment capacity and maintain readiness for wet weather events, the removal of accumulated biosolids is necessary.
52 In addi+on to opera+onal needs, the WRF must also remain in compliance with Senate Bill 1383 (SB 1383), enacted in 2016, which mandates the reduc+on of organic waste disposed of in landfills.

Under SB 1383, the City must demonstrate "verifiable available capacity" to process and recycle organic waste, including biosolids generated at the WRF. Accordingly, staff have submiGed an implementa+on plan to the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) outlining compliance measures for the period of January 1, 2025, through December 31, 2034.

Analysis
On September 15, 2025, City Council awarded a contract to Synagro in the amount of $610,987 and authorized the Public Works Director to sign contract change orders up to the amount of $620,000 for the Sludge Removal and Hauling Project (WW26-0400).

The project was scheduled to begin and be completed in the fall 2026 with a second round of sludge removal to begin in FY2026-27. However, early rainfall delayed the project un+l late this spring. The contractor is currently mobilized and is able to save the City approximately $57,000, combined with an es+mated $109,987 reduc+on in an+cipated contractor demobiliza+on and remobiliza+on costs by continuing the project via a change order in the current fiscal year.

This approach maximizes opera+onal efficiency, reduces future project costs, and further supports the long-term maintenance and treatment capacity needs of the Water Reclama+on Facility. This project is exclusively for sludge hauling and disposal services associated with the maintenance of the sludge removal ponds and does not include any altera+ons, improvements, or upgrades to the existing facility infrastructure.

The sludge removal contract is covered by the City’s Purchasing Policy and per Government Code Sec+on 54202, which allows for a contract change order to proceed under the exis+ng vendor selec+on given the lowest unit price selec+on. Therefore, the recommended ac+on is to increase the project budget in FY 2025-26 and authorize the Public Works Director to execute change orders up to the new project budget.

COUNCIL PRIORITY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS
Infrastructure: "Develop and maintain infrastructure resources to support sustainable growth."

FISCAL IMPACT
The FY2025-26 Capital Budget provided for a project budget for the Sludge Removal and Hauling Project (WW26-0400) in the amount of$620,000 from Fund 540, Wastewater Opera+ons. The proposed FY2026-27 Capital Budget currently provides funding for the Sludge Removal and Hauling Project (WW26-400) through Fund 540 in the amount of $600,000 for a total project budget of $1,220,000.

By increasing the project budget and proceeding with a contract change order in FY2025-26, the City will see substan+al project savings at minimum of $57,000 by proceeding with the work now versus 53 waiting in the next fiscal year.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
15378(b) - The ac+on is not a "Project" subject to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") because it does not qualify as a "Project" under Public Resources Code Sec+ons 21065 and 21080 and in Sec+on 15378(b) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regula+ons. This repair work is also exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act as repair work for exis+ng facilities under Section 15301 of the California Code of Regulations.

COMMUNICATION
Level 2: Targeted Communication
Public outreach for truck hauling through commercial areas while the Green Island Road rehabilita+on project is underway. Coordina+on with mul+ple contractors and city project managers to ensure hauling routes are available.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution: Sludge Hauling Budget Amendment

2. Synagro Sludge Removal and Hauling Proposal 2026

3. Synargo Sludge Removal and Hauling Proposal 2025
54 RESOLUTION NO. 2026-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON AMENDING THE FY2025-26 CAPITAL BUDGET AND INCREASING THE FY2025-26 PROJECT BUDGET FROM $620,000 TO $1,220,000

AND AUTHORIZING THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE CONTRACT CHANGE ORDERS IN AN

AGGREGATE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED THE PROJECT BUDGET, IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE SLUDGE REMOVAL AND HAULING PROJECT (WW26-0400)
WHEREAS, the City of American Canyon Water Reclamation Facility (“WRF”) requires ongoing sludge removal and biosolids hauling services to maintain operational capacity and regulatory compliance; and WHEREAS, on September 15, 2025, City Council awarded a contract to Synagro in the amount of $610,987 and authorized the Public Works Director to execute change order up to the amount of $620,000 for the Sludge Removal and Hauling Project (WW26-0400); and
WHEREAS, while the project was intended to take place in fall 2026 prior to wet weather, the project was delayed until May 2026; and
WHEREAS, staff identified project savings through reduced mobilization costs and operational efficiencies associated with additional biosolids removal activities by executing a contract change order with Synagro, to complete additional work while onsite; and
WHEREAS, the sludge removal contract is covered by the City’s Purchasing Policy and per Government Code Section 54202, which allows for a contract change orders to proceed under the existing vendor selection given the lowest unit price selection; and
WHEREAS, staff recommends amending the FY2025-26 capital budget and increasing the project budget from $620,000 to $1,220,000 for the Sludge Removal and Hauling Project (WW26-0400); and WHEREAS, there are sufficient funds in Fund 540 Wastewater Operation to increase the budget in FY2025- 26 and complete the additional work.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of American Canyon amends the FY2025- 26 capital budget and increases the project budget from $620,000 to $1,220,000 and authorizes the Public Works Director to execute contract change orders in an aggregate amount not to exceed the project budget, in conjunction with the Sludge Removal and Hauling Project (WW26-0400).

PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council of the City of American Canyon held on the 2nd day of June, 2026 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
____________________________
Pierre Washington, Mayor
55 ATTEST: APPROVE AS TO FORM:
____________________________ _____________________________ Taresa Geilfuss, CMC, City Clerk Matthew T. Summers, City Attorney 56 YOUR PARTNER FOR A CLEANER, GREENER WORLD
435 Williams Court, Suite 100
Baltimore, MD 21220
www.synagro.com
MAY 22, 2026
City of American Canyon
Attn: Nolan Garcia
Re: WW26-0400 SLUDGE REMOVAL AND HAULING – CONTRACT
AMENDMENT #1 - PROPOSED
Drat mr. Garcia
Synagro-WWT, I. Inc. (Synagro) is pleased to provide the following updated pricing for tonnage in excess of 300 dry tons. This pricing is predicated on Synagro continuing work without demobilization and remobilization. Accordingly, no additional mobilization and demobilization will be charged in excess of what is in the current agreement.

Please note that Synagro’s unit and extended prices for the services to be provided are as follows:

Line item Units Unit Price
equivalent
Extended Price
per bid sheet for
one 300 dry ton lot
Sludge dewatering 300 $1,120.00 $336,000.00
Sludge disposal 300 $ 758.00 $227,400.00
Total change contract amendment value $563,400.00
All other terms and conditions of the agreement will remain in force. Should you have any questions regarding our submittal, please contact me at (650) 219-6380 or [email protected]. We look forward to hearing from you soon.

Warm regards,
John Pugliaresi
John Pugliaresi
Senior Area Sales Manager
57 Bid for
WW26-0400 Sludge Removal and Hauling
to the

CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON
Submitted on
August 8, 2025

YOUR PARTNER FOR A CLEANER,

GREENER WORLD
58 YOUR PARTNER FOR A CLEANER, GREENER WORLD
435 Williams Court, Suite 100
Baltimore, MD 21220
www.synagro.com
AUGUST 8, 2025
City of American Canyon
Re: WW26-0400 SLUDGE REMOVAL AND HAULING
Ladies and Gentlemen:

Synagro-WWT, Inc. (Synagro) is pleased to respond to the City of American Canyon’s Notice to Bidder’s for the Sludge Removal and Hauling project. Enclosed for your review is our completed bid package.

Having been in business for over 45 years, Synagro is one of the largest residuals management companies in the country with over 650 municipal and industrial customers and operations in 33 states. Synagro provides ongoing residuals management services to numerous water and wastewater treatment plants throughout California and have the personnel and resources in place to successfully complete this project for the City.

Please note that Synagro’s unit and extended prices for the services to be provided are as follows:

Line item Units Unit Price
equivalent
Extended Price per
bid sheet for one
300 dry ton lot
Sludge dewatering 300 $1,050.00 $315,000.00
Sludge disposal 300 $ 620.00 $186,000.00
Synagro appreciates this opportunity. Should you have any questions regarding our submittal, please contact me at (650) 219-6380 or [email protected]. We look forward to hearing from you soon.

Warm regards,
John Pugliaresi
John Pugliaresi, Senior Area Sales Manager
59 435 Williams Court, Suite 100

SYNAGRO
August 13, 2024
Delegation of Authority
Sean Heffernan
I, Kaivan Desai, President and Chief Commercial Officer of Synagro Technologies, Inc. and all its affiliates and subsidiaries, hereby delegate to you, Sean Heffernan, Sales Support Proposal Coordinator, authority to sign as an officer or as an authorized person binding bids, awarded contracts, contract renewals, contract extensions, bid bonds and performance bonds. Also, I delegate to you the authority to sign as an officer or as an authorized person any businessrelated applications and other agreements as necessary to provide uninterrupted service to current and new customers.

Such authority does not alter our internal approval processes. This delegation of authority is valid from the date of this letter until revoked by me.

Kaivan
President & CFO

YOUR PARTNER FORA CLEANER, GREENER WORLD
60 YOUR PARTNER FOR A CLEANER,

GREENER WORLD
Acknowledgement of Addendums 1&2
61 62
63 WorkOrder:

Report Created for: City of American Canyon
151 Mezzetta Court
American Canyon, CA 94503
Project Contact: Pam Phillips
Project: Biosolids
Project P.O.: 24-00054
Project Received: 07/21/2025
Analytical Report reviewed & approved for release on 07/29/2025 by:

Tracy Babjar
2507C90
The report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of the laboratory. The analytical results relate only to the items tested. Results reported conform to the most current regulatory standards, where applicable, unless otherwise stated.

Analytical Report
1534 Willow Pass Rd. Pittsburg, CA 94565 ♦ TEL: (877) 252-9262 ♦ FAX: (925) 252-9269 ♦ www.mccampbell.com CA ELAP 1644 ♦ NELAP 4033 ORELAP
Project Manager
Project Location:

McCampbell Analytical, Inc.
"When Quality Counts"

Page 1 of 86 ends

64 YOUR PARTNER FOR A CLEANER,

GREENER WORLD
Proposal Documents
65 CONTRACTORS

STATE LICENSE BOARD

ACTIVE LICENSE
..8O1688 ECQRP

SYNAGRO - W W T INC
A
12/31i2025 www.csIb.ca.Qov
66 Registration Services:: Page 1 of 2 6/17/2024 10:27:22 AM

APPLICATION FOR

PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION
Registration Information
Type: Public Works
Period: 07/01/2024 06/30/2027
Contractor Information
Contractor Name: SYNAGRO-WWT, INC
Trade Name:

License Type Number: 1000006919
Contractor Physical Address
Physical Business Country: United States of America Physical Business City/ Province:

BALTIMORE
Physical Business Address: 435 WILLIAMS COURT, SUITE 100 Physical Business State: MD Physical Business Postal
Code:
21220
Contractor Mailing Address
Mailing Country: United States of America Mailing City /Province: BALTIMORE Mailing Address: 435 WILLIAMS COURT, SUITE 100 Mailing State: MD Mailing Postal Code: 21220
Contact Info
Daytime Phone: Daytime Phone Ext.:

Mobile Phone: Business Email: [email protected]
Applicant’s Email: [email protected]
67 Registration Services:: Page 2 of 2
Workers’ Compensation
Professional Employer Organization (PEO)
Do you lease employees through Professional Employer Organization? No Workers’ Compensation Overview
Carrier: AMERICAN GUARANTEE &
LIABILITY INS. CO.

Inception Date: 08/01/2023
Policyholder Name: Synagro Technologies, Inc Expiration Date: August 1, 2024 Policy Number: WC924396112
Certification
Yes I certify that I do not have any delinquent liability to an employee or the state for any assessment of back wages or related damages, interest, fines, or penalties pursuant to any final judgment, order, or determination by a court or any federal, state, or local administrative agency, including a confirmed arbitration award Yes I certify that the contractor is not currently debarred under Section 1777.1 or under any other federal or state law providing for the debarment of contractors from public works.

Yes I certify that one of the following is true: (1) I am licensed by the Contractors State License Board (CSLB) in accordance with Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 7000) of the Business and Professions Code; or (2) my business or trade is not subject to licensing by the CSLB.

I understand refunds are not authorized
I, Emil Kneis, the undersigned, am , SYNAGRO-WWT, INC with the authority to act for and on behalf of the above named contractor. I certify under penalty of perjury that all of the above information provided is true and correct. I further acknowledge that any untruthful information provided in this application could result in the certification being canceled.

I certify this on: 10:23 AM
Legal Entity Information
Legal Entity Type: Corporation
Name: SYNAGRO-WWT, INC
68 YOUR PARTNER FOR A CLEANER,

GREENER WORLD
Company Profile 1
Synagro Company Profile
Founded in 1986, Synagro’s core business is the
environmentally sound and economically viable management of municipal biosolids, including project development,
operations and biosolids product distribution. Through this focus, Synagro has grown to be North America’s leading
provider of high-quality, cost-effective biosolids management and beneficial use solutions. We have been successfully meeting the biosolids management needs of hundreds of
generators for more than 45 years. Synagro’s experience in all areas of biosolids management is unparalleled.

Synagro annually manages more than 16 million tons of wastewater biosolids and other organic byproducts. Synagro employs a team of 1200+ professional engineers, soil scientists, agronomists, construction managers, financial managers and the largest, most diverse operational staff in the industry. Our team is dedicated to working with our clients to find the right solution to their organic residuals management challenges. Synagro, and its subsidiaries, are at the forefront of the environmental movement to safely process and market organic residual materials for beneficial uses.

Synagro owns no proprietary technology which enables us to offer nearly all commercially viable processing options and product marketing channels for biosolids and organic residuals and allows us to develop projects that fit a municipality’s unique needs. Our breadth of experience developing, building, financing as necessary, and operating and maintaining the complete range of biosolids options listed below is unique to Synagro.
• Auu • Mobile dewatering
• Composting • Land application and reclamation
• Incineration • Lagoon and digester cleaning
• Digestion • Alkaline stabilization
• Product marketing • Rail transportation
• Dewatering (installation and operation)
Synagro currently operates 18 heat-drying facilities, three thermal processing facilities serving multiple regional generators, 9 composting facilities (8 of which provide an outlet for numerous generators), more than a dozen alkaline stabilization facilities, and in excess of 75 permanent and mobile dewatering facilities.

Biosolids
Management
Experience
45+ years
Annual
Revenue> $300
million
Number of
Employees
1200+
69 YOUR PARTNER FOR A CLEANER,

GREENER WORLD
Company Profile 2
In addition, we provide final product distribution as a key component of many of these projects. Our Product Sales and Marketing team is responsible for successfully managing approximately 300,000 tons per year of AllGro® compost and 170,000 tons of Granulite® fertilizer pellets (heat-dried biosolids). We have unrivalled understanding of the markets for these products and continuously work to broaden the suite of outlets for these materials. As an example, Synagro pioneered the use of heat-dried biosolids as an alternative fuel resource in cement manufacturing. When Synagro operates a facility, we include product distribution services in our operation; however, we also work with municipally operated facilities to assist in managing their products.

In December 2020, Synagro was acquired by West Street Infrastructure Partners III, an infrastructure investment fund managed by Goldman Sachs Merchant Banking Division. Founded in 1869, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. is a leading global investment banking, securities, and investment management firm. Goldman Sachs Merchant Banking Division (MBD) is the primary center for the firm’s long-term principal investing activity. MBD is one of the leading private capital investors in the world with investments across private equity, infrastructure, private debt, growth equity and real estate.
70 Line Item Description Quantity Unit of Measure Unit Cost Total 1 Mobile and Demobilization 1 Each $109,987.00 $109,987.00 2 Sludge Dewatering 300 Dry Tons 1 Each $315,000.00 $315,000.00 3 Sludge Disposal 1 Each $186,000.00 $186,000.00
Total $610,987.00
Cost Proposal
71 72
73 DESIGNATION OF SUBCONTRACTORS
Name of Company:

As required by Section 4100-4107 of the California Public Contract Code, the General Contractor bidding will hereinafter state the subcontractor for each particular trade or subdivision of the work, and will state the firm name and principal location of the mill, shop or office of each. The bidder shall note that he shall perform with his own organization at least 50% of the work with the remainder of the work performed by subcontractors.

If the Contractor fails to specify a subcontractor for any portion of the work to be performed under the contract, he shall be deemed to have agreed to perform such portion himself, and he shall not be permitted to subcontract that portion of the work except under the conditions hereinafter set forth.

Subletting or subcontracting of any portion of the work for which no subcontractor was designated in the original bid shall only be permitted in case of public emergency or necessity, and then only after receiving written approval from the ENGINEER.

The name and location of the shop or office of each subcontractor who will perform work or labor or render service to the Contractor in or about the construction of the project and that portion of the work to be performed by the subcontractor is as follows:

Subcontractor’s Portion of Work or Items of Percent of
Name and Location of Mill,
Shop or Office Work to be Performed Total Contract

1. ______________________ ________________________________ _____________ ______________________ ________________________________ _____________ ______________________ ________________________________ _____________ Subcontractor’s License No. __________________ DIR No. __________________

2. ______________________ ________________________________ _____________ ______________________ ________________________________ _____________ ______________________ ________________________________ _____________ Subcontractor’s License No. __________________ DIR No. __________________

3. ______________________ ________________________________ _____________ ______________________ ________________________________ _____________ ______________________ ________________________________ _____________ Subcontractor’s License No. __________________ DIR No. __________________ Note: Attach additional sheets if required
Synagro-WWT, Inc.

Jess Ranch Trucking
Manteca, CA 95336
1886 Northgate Drive
Hauling
Cal T #0206711 1000007356
9%
74 75
76 YOUR PARTNER FOR A CLEANER,

GREENER WORLD
Claims and Lawsuits

List all claims and lawsuits presented or filed in the last five (5) years, regardless of the form, regarding any public works project:

Synagro has been named as a defendant in claims on insured matters (i.e. worker’s compensation, liability, etc.). None of the claims or lawsuits have an impact to ongoing operations. • Richard Martin et al v. Synagro-WWT, Inc., et al, Case No. 50-CV-21-900113, Circuit Court of Marshall County, Alabama.

Personal injury, nuisance, trespass, and negligence claims asserted based on noxious odors allegedly emanating from Synagro’s performance of services for Tyson Foods. • Marvin Carter et al v. Synagro of Texas-CDR, Inc., Synagro-WWT, Inc., et al, Case No. 067-339040-22, Tarrant County, Texas, District Court.

Personal injury, nuisance, trespass, and negligence claims resulting from alleged improper application of Fort Worth biosolids on neighbor’s property. • Blevins et al v. Synagro Technologies, Inc., et al, Case No. 5:22-cv-01866-FLA-KK, United States District Court for Central District of California Personal injury, property damage, trespass, and nuisance claim allegedly resulting from a fire at Nursery Products compost facility.
77 78

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
JUNE 2, 2026

STAFF REPORT

CONSENT
ITEM NUMBER: 13.

TITLE
Two-year Intergovernmental Services Agreement with the Housing Authority of the City of Napa (HACN)

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a Resolu/on authorizing the City Manager to sign a two-year Intergovernmental Services Agreement with the Housing Authority of the City of Napa (HACN) for housing-related services for the City of American Canyon during Fiscal Year 2026/27 and 2027/28.

CONTACT
Brent Cooper, AICP, Community Development Director

BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS
The Housing Authority of the City of Napa (HACN) provides housing-related services for the City of American Canyon. Contrac/ng these services with HACN provides a collabora/ve and cost-effec/ve partnership.

The proposed two-year Intergovernmental Services Agreement would occur during Fiscal Year 2026/27 and 2027/28 at a Not to Exceed cost of $230,300.

The agreement provides the City of American Canyon with HACN staff on a variety of Housingrelated services. These services include: Grant applica/on and administra/on for the First Time Homebuyer Down Payment Program, Owner-Occupied Rehabilita/on Program, prepare quarterly and annual Program Income Reports and Performance Reports, conduct annual monitoring of affordable housing units; Sec/on 8 Housing Unit monitoring; par/cipate in the Napa County Con/nuum of Care; advise staff on development applica/ons to maximize op/ons for affordable housing.

A Resolu/on to approve is included as A?achment 1. The Agreement which includes the scope of services is included as Exhibit A to Attachment 1.

COUNCIL PRIORITY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS
Organizational Effectiveness: "Deliver exemplary government services." 79 FISCAL IMPACT
The proposed contract costs for the 1st year are included in the Fiscal Year 2026-27 budget. The 2nd year costs will be included in the future Fiscal Year 2027-28 budget.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
15378(b) - The ac/on is not a "Project" subject to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") because it does not qualify as a "Project" under Public Resources Code Sec/ons 21065 and 21080 and in Section 15378(b) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.

COMMUNICATION
Level 0: No Further Public Communication Needed
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution - Housing Authority
Exhibit A - American Canyon Housing Services Contract
80 RESOLUTION NO. 2026-______

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN A TWO-YEAR INTERGOVERNMENTAL

SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF NAPA (HACN) FOR HOUSING-RELATED SERVICES FOR THE CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON DURING FISCAL YEAR 2026/27 AND 2027/28
WHEREAS, the City of American Canyon and the City of Napa have proposed entering into a two-year Agreement during Fiscal Year 2026/27 and Fiscal Year 2027/28 for Housing-related supportive services provided by the Housing Authority of the City of Napa (HACN) for a Not to Exceed cost of $230,000; and WHEREAS, City lacks the qualified personnel to provide the specified work product; and WHEREAS, the “baseline” services provided by this agreement is depicted in the table below:

WORK PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
A. COUNTYWIDE ACTIVITIES

1. Section 8 Housing Services HUD funded very low-income rental housing assistance program administer
Countywide – 84% City of Napa, 12%
American Canyon, & 4% elsewhere in
County.

2. Continuum of Care Participate in Countywide Continuum of Care for delivery of homeless services &
projects.

B. STANDARD HOUSING SERVICES

1. Regulatory Agreement Monitoring Provide required annual monitoring of regulatory agreement units.

2. Review development projects Technical assistance reviewing proposed housing developments to maximize
affordable housing units.

3. Loan Servicing Provide loan servicing and owner
occupancy monitoring for CalHome,
HOME, BEGIN, & CDBG homebuyer &
rehab loans.

4. Affordable Housing Regulatory Agreements Review affordable housing agreements & make recommendations.

5. Annual Meeting with Staff and Council Report on year's activities; and WHEREAS, total compensation for the services provided by HACN to the City under this Agreement, including the Baseline Rate and the Pass-Through Rate, shall not exceed $113,300 for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 and $117,000 for Fiscal Year 2027-2028; and
WHEREAS, if the City authorizes HACN to perform “Additional Services,” Authority will be compensated for the Additional Services on a time and materials basis; and
81 WHEREAS, consistent with the “A/B/C Test” stipulated by the Dynamex Operations West Inc. v. Superior Court (Case No. S222732), the HACN is an independent contractor free from the control and direction of the City in connection with the performance of the work, who performs work that is outside the usual course of the City’s business and is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, or business of the same nature as the work performed for the City.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of American Canyon City Council authorizes the City Manager to enter into a two-year Agreement with the Housing Authority of the City of Napa as depicted as Exhibit A to this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council of the City of American Canyon held on the 16
th day of June 2026 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
____________________________
Pierre Washington, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________ ________________________________ Taresa Geilfuss, CMC, City Clerk Matthew Summers, City Attorney Exhibit A – Intergovernmental Agreement for Services by and between the Housing Authority of the City of Napa and the City of American Canyon
82 EXHIBIT A
HR2026-__ Page 1 of 9

INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES BY AND BETWEEN THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF

THE CITY OF NAPA AND

THE CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF NAPA AGREEMENT NO. _____ CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON AGREEMENT NO. _____
THIS AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES (this “Agreement”) is made and entered into as of July 1, 2026 (“Effective Date”), by and between the HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF NAPA, a public body, corporate and politic (the "Authority"), and the CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON, a municipal corporation (the “City”) under the joint exercise of powers provisions of the Government Code of the State of California, California Government Code Section 6500-6536. City and Authority are public entities organized and operating under the laws of the State of California and each is a public entity as defined in California Government Code Section 6500. The Authority and City are hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Parties.”

RECITALS
WHEREAS, the City desires to obtain housing services from the Authority during the Fiscal Year 2026 – 2027 and Fiscal Year 2027 – 2028, and the Authority is willing to provide such services to the City subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein.

TERMS
NOW, THEREFORE, City and Authority agree as follows:

1. Term of the Agreement. The term of this Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and shall expire on June 30, 2028 (the “Term”) unless earlier terminated in accordance with Paragraphs 7 or 8 of this Agreement.

2. Scope of Services. Authority shall perform the services described in the Scope of Services in Exhibit “A”, attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein (the “Services”).

3. Compensation.
(a) Baseline Rate. In consideration of Authority’s performance of the Services, the City shall pay to Authority the baseline rate (“Baseline Rate”) of One Hundred Thirteen Thousand Three Hundred Dollars ($113,300.00) for fiscal year 2026–2027 and One Hundred Seventeen Thousand Dollars ($117,000.00) for fiscal year 2027–2028.
(b) Maximum Annual Compensation. The total compensation for the Services provided by Authority to the City under this Agreement, including the Baseline Rate shall not exceed $113,300.00 for fiscal year 2026-2027 or $117,000.00 for fiscal year 2027-2028 as detailed in the following table:

COMPENSATION BREAKDOWN
Service Provided FY2026-27 Cost FY2027-28 Cost Total Cost HACN Baseline Housing Services (Baseline
Rate) $113,300 $117,000 $230,300
83

Page 2 of 9 ends

City of American Canyon
Services Agreement FY 2026-28
(d) Rate for Additional Services. If the City authorizes Authority to perform services that are not included in the Scope of Services set forth in Exhibit “A” (“Additional Services”), Authority will be compensated for the Additional Services on a time and materials basis. The rate for Authority’s time for the Additional Services shall be the then-current fully burdened overhead rate (the “Fully Burdened Overhead Rate”) for the employee performing the Additional Services. The Fully Burdened Overhead Rate is an hourly billable rate that captures all Authority costs (direct and indirect) associated with an employee, over and above gross compensation or payroll costs. Typical costs associated with the Fully Burdened Overhead Rate include payroll taxes, worker's compensation, health insurance, paid time off, pension contributions, other benefits, and indirect costs including departmental and citywide administrative overhead allocations. The applicable Fully Burdened Overhead Rate will depend on the Authority employee performing Additional Services as each employee has a different Fully Burdened Overhead Rate that is calculated based on that particular employee’s salary and benefits. (e) Invoices for Additional Services. Authority will submit a monthly itemized invoice to the City for any Additional Services provided by the Authority during the preceding month. The City will pay the Authority within 30 days after approval of each invoice.

4. Method of Payment. The Authority shall provide to City an invoice for payment for the Services on the following dates and in the following amounts:
(a) On July 1, 2026, an invoice equal to 50% of the Baseline Rate for fiscal year 2026-2027 in the amount of $56,650.00; and
(b) On January 1, 2027, a second invoice for the remaining 50% of the Baseline Rate for fiscal year 2026-2027 in the amount of $56,650.00.
(c) On July 1, 2027, a third invoice for 50% of the Baseline Rate for fiscal year 2027-2028 in the amount of $58,500.00; and
(d) On January 1, 2028, a fourth invoice for the remaining 50% of the Baseline Rate for fiscal year 2027-2028 in the amount of $58,500.00.

City shall pay the Authority within thirty (30) days following receipt of an invoice.

5. Independent Contractor. The Authority shall perform the Services under this Agreement as an independent contractor. The Authority and the officers, agents and employees of Authority are not, and shall not be deemed, City employees for any purpose, including workers' compensation. The Authority shall determine the method and manner by which the Services shall be performed. The Authority and its officers, employees and agents shall not be entitled to any of the benefits accorded to a City employee.

City shall not deduct or withhold any amounts whatsoever from the compensation paid to the Authority, including, but not limited to amounts required to be withheld for state and federal taxes. The Authority shall be solely responsible for all such payments.
84

Page 3 of 9 ends

City of American Canyon
Services Agreement FY 2026-28

6. Indemnification. To the fullest extent permitted by law, City shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the Authority and its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents and employees from and against any and all liability or claims (including actions, demands, damages, injuries, settlements, losses, or costs [including legal costs and attorney's fees]) (collectively, “Liability”) of any nature, arising out of, pertaining to, or relating to City’s acts or omissions under this Agreement. Consistent with Civil Code Section 2782, City will not be obligated to indemnify Authority for the proportionate share of the Liability caused by the Authority’s active negligence, sole negligence, or willful misconduct. City’s indemnification obligations under this Agreement are not limited by any limitations of any insurance held by City, including, but not limited to, workers’ compensation insurance. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Authority shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless City and its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents and employees from and against any Liability of any nature, arising out of, pertaining to, or relating to the Authority’s acts or omissions under this Agreement. Consistent with Civil Code Section 2782, Authority will not be obligated to indemnify City for the proportionate share of the Liability caused by the City’s active negligence, sole negligence, or willful misconduct. Authority’s indemnification obligations under this Agreement are not limited by any limitations of any insurance held by Authority, including, but not limited to, workers’ compensation insurance.

7. Termination for Cause. If either party shall fail to fulfill in a timely and proper manner that party's obligations under this Agreement or otherwise breach this Agreement, the non-defaulting party may, in addition to any other remedies it may have, terminate this Agreement by giving fifteen (15) days written notice to the defaulting party in the manner set forth in Paragraph 11 (Notices).

8. Termination for the Convenience of a Party. This Agreement may be terminated by either party for any reason and at any time by giving no less than thirty (30) days prior written notice of such termination to the other party and specifying the effective date thereof.

9. Payment for Work upon Expiration or Termination. In the event of termination for cause under Paragraph 7 or termination for the convenience of a party under Paragraph 8, Authority shall be entitled to receive compensation for any satisfactory Services and/or Additional Services provided by the Authority prior to the effective date of the notice subject to the maximum amount set forth in Paragraph 3(c). In the event the termination results in the Authority receiving payment in an amount that exceeds the amount due to Authority for the Services provided under this Agreement, City shall be entitled to receive reimbursement for any overpayment from Authority.

10. No Waiver. The waiver by either party of any breach or violation of any requirement of this Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any such breach in the future, or of the breach of any other requirement of this Agreement.

11. Notices. All notices required or authorized by this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be delivered in person or by deposit in the United States mail, by first class mail, postage prepaid. Any mailed notice, demand, request, consent, approval or communication that either party desires to give the other party shall be addressed to the other party at the address set forth below. Either party may change its address by notifying the other party of the change of address. Any notice sent by mail in the manner prescribed by this paragraph shall be deemed to have been received on the date noted on the return receipt or five days following the date of deposit, whichever is earlier. 85

Page 4 of 9 ends

City of American Canyon
Services Agreement FY 2026-28

AUTHORITY CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON
Housing Manager Jason B. Holley, City Manager
Housing Authority of the City of Napa City of American Canyon P.O. Box 660 4381 Broadway, Suite 201
Napa, CA 94559 American Canyon, CA 94503

12. Confidentiality. Confidential information is defined as all information disclosed to the Authority which relates to City past, present, and future activities, as well as activities under this Agreement.

Except as otherwise provided in Paragraph 15, as directed by the City Manager or designee thereof, or when required by the California Public Records Act, a subpoena or by court order, the Authority shall hold all such information as the Authority may receive, if any, in trust and confidence.

13. Amendment/Modification. Except as specifically provided herein, this Agreement may be modified or amended only in a writing signed by the Parties.

14. Compliance with Laws. In the performance of this Agreement, the Authority shall observe and comply with all applicable Federal, State and local laws, ordinances, and codes.

15. Access to Records/Retention. City shall have access to any books, documents, papers and records of the Authority prepared or obtained by the Authority when providing the Services under this Agreement. Upon expiration or termination of this Agreement the Authority shall return all such records to City unless otherwise directed by City to retain or dispose of such records, except that with the written permission of City, the Authority may keep a copy of such records as long as such copy is maintained in confidence and is returned to City or its successor agency to be destroyed upon notification to Authority that City has authorized destruction of the original records.

16. Attorney's Fees. In the event that either party commences legal action of any kind or character to either enforce the provisions of this Agreement or to obtain damages for breach thereof, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to all costs and reasonable attorney's fees incurred in connection with such action.

17. Interpretation. The headings used herein are for reference. The terms of the Agreement are set out in the text under the headings. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California.

18. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement, or any portion thereof, is found by any court of competent jurisdiction to be unenforceable or invalid for any reason, such provision shall be severable and shall not in any way impair the enforceability of any other provision of this Agreement.

19. Entirety of Contract. This Agreement, together with “Exhibits A and B” attached hereto and incorporated herein, constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties relating to the subject of this Agreement and supersedes all previous agreements, promises, representations, understandings and negotiations, whether written or oral, among the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof.

20. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each one of which is deemed an original, but all of which together constitute a single instrument. 86

Page 5 of 9 ends

City of American Canyon
Services Agreement FY 2026-28

21. Privileges and Immunities. In accordance with California Government Code section 6513, all of the privileges and immunities from liability, all exemptions from laws, ordinances and rules, and all pension, relief, disability, workmen’s compensation, and other benefits which apply to the activity of the trustees, officers, employees or agents of the Parties when performing their functions within the territorial limits of their respective public agencies, shall apply to them to the same degree and extent while engaged in the performance of any of their functions and duties associated with performance of this Agreement. [Signature page follows.]
87

Page 6 of 9 ends

City of American Canyon
Services Agreement FY 2026-28

22. Signatures; Electronic Signatures. The individuals executing this Agreement represent and warrant that they have the right, power, legal capacity, and authority to enter into and to execute this Agreement on behalf of the respective legal entities of the Authority and the City. The parties agree that this Agreement may be executed and transmitted electronically and that electronic signatures shall have the same force and effect as original signatures in accordance with the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act, 15 U.S.C. 7001 et seq.; the California Uniform Electronic Transactions Act, Civil Code Section 1633.1 et seq. and California Government Code Section 16.5.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement was executed by the Parties as of the date first above written.

CITY:

CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON, a municipal corporation
By: ________________________________________
PIERRE WASHINGTON, Mayor, City Council
ATTEST:

By: ________________________________________
TARESA GEILFUSS, CMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By: ________________________________________
MATTHEW SUMMERS, City Attorney
AUTHORITY:

HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF NAPA, a public body, corporate and politic By: ________________________________________
STEVE POTTER, Executive Director
COUNTERSIGNED:

By: ________________________________________
ERIKA LEAHY, City Auditor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By: _________________________________________
Christopher Diaz, Interim Authority General Counsel
88

Page 7 of 9 ends

City of American Canyon
Services Agreement FY 2026-28
EXHIBIT “A”
Scope of Services

WORK PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
A. COUNTYWIDE ACTIVITIES

1. Section 8 Housing Services HUD funded very low-income rental housing assistance program administer
Countywide – 84% City of Napa, 12%
American Canyon, & 4% elsewhere in
County

2. Continuum of Care Participate in Countywide Continuum of Care for delivery of homeless services &
projects.

B. STANDARD HOUSING SERVICES

1. Regulatory Agreement Monitoring Provide required annual monitoring of regulatory agreement units summarized in
Exhibit B

2. Review development projects Technical assistance reviewing proposed housing developments to maximize
affordable housing units

3. Loan Servicing Provide loan servicing and owner
occupancy monitoring for CalHome,
HOME, BEGIN, & CDBG homebuyer &
rehab loans.

4. Affordable Housing Regulatory Agreements Review affordable housing agreements & make recommendations

5. Annual Meeting with Staff and Council Report on year's activities C. ADDITIONAL HOUSING SERVICES

1. Additional housing services as mutually agreed
to
TBD: The Authority shall be compensated
for such additional services in accordance
with Section 3(d).
89

Page 8 of 9 ends

City of American Canyon
Services Agreement FY 2026-28
EXHIBIT “B”

MONITORING DETAIL
Project Type
Affordable
Units Task Description
Vineyard Crossing MF 70 Annually
Mail out project compliance report and review
tenant information for compliance with
Regulatory Agreement. Up-date project
database.

Canyon Ridge
Apartments MF 8 Annually
Mail out project compliance report and review
tenant information for compliance with
Regulatory Agreement. Up-date project
database.

Village at Vintage Ranch MF 16 Annually
Lease up certification. Mail out project
compliance report and review tenant
information for compliance with Regulatory
Agreement. Up-date project database.

Lemos Pointe MF 186 Annually
Mail out project compliance report and review
tenant information for compliance with
Regulatory Agreement. Up-date project
database.

Napa Cove MF 65 Annually
Mail out project compliance report and review
tenant information for compliance with
Regulatory Agreement. Up-date project
database.

Valley View Apartments Senior 70 Annually
Lease up certification. Mail out project
compliance report and review tenant
information for compliance with Regulatory
Agreement. Up-date project database.

Heritage Park BMR 7 Annually
Mail out owner occupancy certification, verify
insurance & taxes paid. Follow-up when
necessary. Up-date owner database
Chesapeake Homes BMR 10 Annually
Mail out owner occupancy certification, verify
insurance & taxes paid. Follow-up when
necessary. Up-date owner database
Vineyard Place BMR 23 Annually
Mail out owner occupancy certification, verify
insurance & taxes paid. Follow-up when
necessary. Up-date owner database

CDBG, HOME &
CalHome Rehab Loans loans 40* Annually
Mail out owner occupancy certification, verify
insurance & taxes paid. Follow-up when
necessary. Up-date owner database
90

Page 9 of 9 ends

City of American Canyon
Services Agreement FY 2026-28
HOME & CalHome First
Time Homebuyer Loans loans 15* Annually
Mail out owner occupancy certification, verify
insurance & taxes paid. Follow-up when
necessary. Up-date owner database
Additional affordable
housing units MF up to 16** Annually
Lease up certification. Mail out project
compliance report and review tenant
information for compliance with Regulatory
Agreement. Update project database.

MF = rental multifamily
BMR = Below Market Rate home ownership
*Number of loans may increase or decrease over the term of contract **Affordable units beyond the number identified above shall be billed on a time and material basis in accordance
with Paragraph 3(d).
91 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
JUNE 2, 2026

STAFF REPORT

PUBLIC HEARING
ITEM NUMBER: 14.

TITLE
Fiscal Year 2026-27 Recommended Budget and Five-Year Capital Improvement Program

RECOMMENDATION

1. Adopt a Resolu-on approving adop-on of the Recommended Opera-ng Budget for Fiscal Year 2026-27 and authorizing the City Manager to increase the appropria-ons for FY 2026-27 expenditures in an amount not to exceed the amount encumbered for expenses that did not occur prior to the end of FY 2025-26 but are expected to be expended in FY 2026-27 consistent with the original purpose.

2. Adopt a Resolu-on approving the Five-Year Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Years 2026- 27 to 2030-31.

CONTACT
Jemelyn Cruz, Finance Director
Erica Ahmann Smithies, Public Works Director

BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS
The Fiscal Year (FY) 2026-27 Budget process kicked off in February. Finance Department staff has developed the Final Recommended Budget in collabora-on with other City departments, the Assistant City Manager and the City Manager. The "Proposed Budget" was presented to the Finance Subcommi>ee on May 7, 2026, and the City Council on May 19, 2026. This "Final Recommended Budget" is being brought forth for adop-on, incorpora-ng final es-mates and updated informa-on.

Changes from Proposed Budget
The significant revisions from the proposed budget presented on May 19, 2026, include an update to Capital Improvement Project TR23-0200 (South Kelly-Highway 29 Intersec-on Project) to reflect the approved increase of $4,460,000 at the May 19, 2026 mee-ng, as well as the addi-on of $135,000 to project costs for TR24-0200 (Melvin Siewalk). All other changes consist of minor adjustments to final estimates.

All Funds
The FY 2026-27 Proposed Budget for All Funds is approximately $149.0M. This amount represents an decrease of approximately $5.3M (or 3.4%) from the FY 2025-26 Adopted Budget. 92 General Fund
The FY 2026-27 General Fund (GF) Proposed Budget is "balanced", with no projected deficit or surplus.

General Fund appropria-ons are approximately $34.2M. This amount represents an increase of $1.9M (or 5.9%) from the FY 2025-26 Adopted GF Budget.

Overall budget categories at their aggregate levels are shown in A>achment 1. Exhibit A - Summary of Proposed Revenues and Expenses. Es-mated revenues and expenses (by fund) and projected ending fund balances are shown in Attachment 1. Exhibit B.

General Fund Revenue
The FY 2026-27 Proposed GF Revenues total approximately $34.3M. Of that amount, property taxes are expected to increase 2.67% (to $15.8M). This increase reflects con-nued development ac-vity and the sale of new homes in 2025. There is lag between a home sale and realiza-on of new property tax. For example, home sales in 2025 are placed on the "January 2026 Property Tax Roll" and then become property tax revenue in FY 2026-27.

Sales tax revenues are es-mated to decrease by $1400k to $3.5M as the City begins to recover from significant declines experienced over the past two years following the closure of a major sales tax generator. Actual revenues in Fiscal Year 2025-26 are coming in higher than the previously anticipated level of decline.

Transient Occupancy Taxes (TOT) revenues are projected at $2.0M. This amount includes the projec-on of the fourth hotel (Home 2 Suites) being open for the full FY 2026-27 fiscal year. TOT revenues from the exis-ng three proper-es are projected to remain flat. Addi-onal hotels (Hampton Inn and Watson Ranch Hotel) are expected to increase TOT revenues in outlying fiscal years.

Other taxes, such Franchise Fees ($1.3M), will con-nue to increase as American Canyon grows.

Most of these estimates are based on consultant analysis of economic performance.

Transfers-in for support services are projected to increase by $80k to $3.7M.

The remainder of the opera-onal revenues are budgeted conserva-vely but con-nue to grow moderately. Most of these es-mates are based on consultant analysis of economic performance and will be reassessed as more information becomes available.

General Fund Expenditures
The FY 2026-27 Proposed GF Expenditures total approximately $34.3M. Of that amount, personnel expenditures - including cost-of-living-adjustments for employees, step increases and re93 classifica-ons for eligible employees, costs for employee re-rement benefits, and Other PostEmployment Benefits - are proposed to increase by $562k (or 6%) to $11.3M.

The Proposed Budget includes the addi-on of (1) Chief Building Official in the Community Development Department and (1) Maintenance Worker in the Parks Maintenance Division of Public Works. The Chief Building Official will increase efficiencies in the Building and Safety Division and is funded by revenue from Building Charges for Services. The Maintenance worker will help meet the increased workload and responsibili-es due to expanded park and landscape infrastructure, new facilities and higher community expectations.

Non-personnel expenditures include a $0.8M increase (or 7.9%) to the Sheriff Contract for Police Services, totaling $10.5M. This increase includes one addi-onal officer and increased costs to salaries, benefits, and insurance.

Contribu-ons to the Internal Service Fund (ISF) for Building, Fleet, and Informa-on Technology are proposed to increase 13.8%.

Fund Balance
GF Fund Balance is proposed to be $11.4M. Fund Balance will be comprised of $1.7M in commi>ed, assigned, or restricted funds, with $8.4M reserved for con-ngency, and $1.3M Unassigned. The GF Con-ngency Reserve represents 25% of the projected FY 25-26 expenditures and will remain fully funded under the proposed budget.

FY 2026-27 Capital Budget & 5-Year Capital Improvement Program The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is primarily funded from restricted sources (such as Gas Tax, etc.), as well as Enterprise Funds, where appropriate. It is a five-year planning tool that iden-fies an-cipated capital improvements and their funding sources. The 5-year CIP does not appropriate funds, but rather func-ons as a forecas-ng tool which supports appropria-ons made through the annual budget adoption process.

The FY 2026-27 Capital Budget provides for total appropria-ons of $44.1M. The subsequent forecasts are updated annually as they are subject to change due to more detailed engineering analysis becoming available, City Council direc-on on project priori-es, updates to revenues, including grant opportuni-es, and changes in project costs. CIP programs and projects are dedicated to maintaining and improving the city infrastructure in several categories: Civic, Parks, Recycled Water, Transporta-on, Wastewater, and Water. A>achment 3 to this report summarizes the five-year funding strategy for capital improvements. The following table summarizes the project funding by category for the Five-Year CIP, including the FY 2026-27 Capital Budget for adoption:

Project
Category
Proposed
Budget
FY 2026-27
Projected
FY 2027-28
Projected
FY 2028-29
Projected
FY 2029-30
Projected
FY 2030-31
Total of
Projects
94 Civic Facilities $2,805,544 $1,000,000 $100,000 $0 $0 $3,905,544 Parks $4,039,897 $2,369,750 $2,065,000 $5,130,000 $0 $13,604,647 Transportation $23,274,207 $4,573,750 $4,835,730 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $36,683,687 Water $7,922,515 $900,000 $0 $0 $0 $8,822,515
Wastewater $5,392,171 $1,375,000 $575,000 $75,000 $2,075,000 $9,492,171 Recycled
Water
$671,440 $0 $0 $0 $0 $671,440
TOTAL $44,105,774 $10,218,500 $7,575,730 $7,205,000 $4,075,000 $73,180,004 Government Code Sec-ons 65401 and 65402 requires the CIP be consistent with (Sec-on 65401) and be in conformance with the General Plan. On May 28, 2026, the Planning Commission found the Fiscal Year 2026-27 CIP consistent with the General Plan.

Water Fund
The FY 2026-27 Water Fund Proposed Budget has a projected deficit of $4.4M, with $7.9M attributed to one-time capital improvement costs.

Water Fund revenues are projected to be $23.5M, with opera-ons revenues projected to increase by $1.0M to $12.0M as a result of anticipated increases to service rates in January 2027.

Water Fund expenditures are projected to be $27.9M, which is an increase of $5.2M over the prior year budget. This increase is primarily due to one--me capital improvement costs. Notable projects include the Zone 5 Water Pump Sta-on ($6.5M), as well as new projects added to the list such as Oat Hill Tank 1 Exterior Coating Rehab and 260 Mobile Home Park Service Connection.

Capacity fee revenues are projected at $3.2M. These revenues are collected from development projects and funds will be utilized as the water system is expanded.

Wastewater Fund
The FY 2026-27 Wastewater Fund Proposed Budget is projected to have a deficit of $3.9M.

Wastewater Fund revenues are projected to increase by $1.9M to $14.4M, with operations revenues projected to increase $0.9M to $7.7M.

Wastewater Fund expenditures are projected to be $18.2M, an increase of $3.6M primarily to fund capital projects, as the Wastewater Capital Improvements total $5.4M. New projects added this year are the High Strength Waste Project, UV Rehab, and Melvin/Wilson Main Repair.

Capacity Fee revenues are projected at $1.8M, expenses are projected at $2.3M and include a $1.0M transfer to the CIP for the Broadway Sewer Rehabilita-on-Crawford to Donaldson Project and $1.0M transfer to CIP for the High Strength Waste Project. 95 Recycled Water Fund
This newly created fund is now reported as a separate enterprise in our financial statements.

Recycled Water is a key aspect of our water supply system – and as such – it was appropriate to create a separate enterprise fund separate from the Water and Wastewater Enterprise Funds. The proposed fund revenue totals $1.1M and proposed expenditures total $2.1M.

A rate study was recently completed, increasing the rates for recycled water to fund opera-onal costs, and as more customers join the system, more revenue will be available to help this enterprise become self-sufficient.

Internal Services Funds
The City has historically maintained four (4) internal service funds (ISF) to support city services:

Building Maintenance, Fleet, Informa-on Technology, and Legal Services. The goal of any ISF is to break even over -me. Fund balances are allowable if there is a plan to use those resources to fulfill the objec-ve of the fund, such as informa-on technology replacement, fleet replacements or other large building maintenance improvement or repair.

Total ISF revenues are projected to increase $0.5M to $4.5M. Total ISF expenditures are projected to increase by $0.5M to $4.6M.

The Building Maintenance ISF Fund Balance will be drawn down to fund the City Hall Repain-ng and Fascia Improvements Fund Balance in Fleet Maintenance will be drawn down to fund 3 vehicle outfittings.

Debt Service
The City maintains total debt of $7.5M as of June 30, 2025. This amount represents 5.2% of the City's All Funds amount. Annual debt service payments total $0.9M in FY 2026-27 across a number of funding sources, excluding non-financed long-term liabili-es such as compensated absences, claims and judgments, net pension liability, and other post-employment benefits.

Looking Towards the Future
Projected growth in American Canyon will increase our property tax base, which accounts for over half of the City’s discre-onary income. New residen-al, industrial and commercial development will also likely increase sales tax revenues to help pay for City services as more residents shop and dine in town and more businesses open up. There are also two (2) proposed new hotels that would supplement TOT revenues.

Our projects for Fiscal Year 2026-27 con-nue to evolve. With con-nued infla-onary pressures in mind, we have begun to see minimal to no growth in many sales tax categories and a slowdown in exis-ng home sales as inventory con-nues to be limited, as the revenue projec-ons in this proposal suggest. New homes con-nue to sell and add to the City's property tax base, although persistently high interest rates have tempered demand somewhat as American Canyon con-nues to be a 96 desirable place to live and remains the most affordable area in the County.

Staff has also developed a 5-Year forecast providing analysis on projected revenues, employee benefits, pension costs and non-personnel expense trends (Attachment 4).

COUNCIL PRIORITY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS
Organizational Effectiveness: "Deliver exemplary government services."

FISCAL IMPACT
The Recommended Ac-on adopts the Recommended Opera-ng Budget for Fiscal Year 2026-27 of $148,951,336.

The proposed budget reports are located on the City's Transparency Portal at the following link:

Proposed Budget

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Approval of a 5-Year CIP and Capital Fund Budgets do not qualify as "Project(s)" as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act. Therefore, the Recommended Ac-ons are exempt from environmental review. However, each of the projects listed in the 5-year CIP will be subject to environmental review (when applicable to poten-al changes in the physical environment and as required by applicable law) at the earliest opportunity.

COMMUNICATION
Level 1: Minimal Communication
Budget document will be published to the website by July 1, 2026. Proposed budget reports are available on the City's transparency portal.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution - Operating Budget FY 2026-27
Exhibit A - Summary of Revenue and Expenses FY 2026-27
Exhibit B - Summary of Projected Fund Balances FY 2026-27

2. Resolution - Five-Year CIP Program 2026-27 to 2030-31

3. Five-Year CIP Summaries

4. Five-Year General Fund Forecast
97 RESOLUTION NO. 2026-______

RESOLUTION APPROVING ADOPTION OF THE RECOMMENDED OPERATING BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO INCREASE THE APPROPRIATIONS FOR FY 2026-27 EXPENDITURES IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED

THE AMOUNT ENCUMBERED FOR EXPENSES THAT DID NOT OCCUR PRIOR TO THE END OF THE FY 2025-26 BUT ARE EXPECTED TO BE EXPENDED IN FY 2026-27 CONSISTENT WITH THE ORIGINAL PURPOSE
WHEREAS, the Finance Subcommittee and City Council reviewed the Fiscal Year 2026-27 Citywide Proposed Operating Budget on May 7th and May 19th, 2026, respectively, and provided direction for the Recommended Operating Budget; and
WHEREAS, the Recommend Operating Budget proposes a balanced General Fund budget for Fiscal Year 2026-27 when including Developer Projects; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager has prepared a Recommended Fiscal Year 2026-27 Operating Budget that incorporates the Council requested changes and provides for organizational adjustments and allocations of resources in a manner which aligns with available resources; and WHEREAS, the Summary of Proposed Revenues and Expenses attached hereto, reflects the Fiscal Year 2026-27 Budget for Governmental and Proprietary Funds for the City of American Canyon; and WHEREAS, the City Council is required to adopt a Fiscal Year 2026-27 Budget before July 1, 2025.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of American Canyon hereby adopts the Recommended Operating Budget for Fiscal Year 2026-27, as shown generally attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibits A and B.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of American Canyon authorizes the City Manager to increase the appropriations for Fiscal Year 2026-27 expenditures in an amount not to exceed the amount encumbered for expenses that did not occur prior to the end of Fiscal Year 2025-26 but are expected to be expended in Fiscal Year 2026-27 consistent with the original purpose.

PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council of the City of American Canyon held on the 2nd day of June 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
_________________________________
Pierre Washington, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVE AS TO FORM:
_______________________________ _______________________________ Taresa Geilfuss, CMC, City Clerk Matthew T. Summers, City Attorney 98 REVENUES 2023-24 Actuals 2024-25 Actuals
2025-26 Estimated
Actuals
2026-27 Budget
(Proposed)
% of
Budget
PROPERTY TAX 13,979,137.00 14,315,420 15,388,500 15,799,265 46.2% SALES TAX 4,320,251.00 3,888,031 3,550,000 3,500,000 10.2% TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX 1,426,580.00 1,301,442 1,929,000 2,000,000 5.9% OTHER TAXES 588,319.00 568,005 598,000 614,200 1.8%
TOTAL TAX REVENUES 20,314,287.00 20,072,898 21,465,500 21,913,465 64.1% FRANCHISE FEES 1,092,411.00 1,196,954 1,217,000 1,277,000 3.7% LICENSES AND PERMITS 490,686.00 589,878 673,400 742,000 2.2% FINES, FORFEITURES, AND PENALTIES 41,143.00 165,905 97,400 123,000 0.4% INTERGOVERNMENTAL 90,766.00 78,397 86,000 92,245 0.3%
CHARGES FOR SERVICES 1,375,533.00 1,562,716 2,887,698 2,884,284 8.4% INVESTMENT EARNINGS (INTEREST AND RENTS) 1,409,803.00 973,369 925,955 732,758 2.1% MISCELLANEOUS 411,486.00 679,499 602,816 632,485 1.9%
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES 4,911,828.00 5,246,718 6,490,269 6,483,772 19.0% TRANSFERS IN - INTERFUND FOR SUPPORT SERVICES 2,377,336.00 3,137,316 3,645,591 3,698,917 10.8% TRANSFERS IN - GASOLINE TAX 300,000.00 400,000 500,000 400,000 1.2% TRANSFERS IN - CAPITAL PROJECTS - - 50,000 235,000 0.7% TRANSFERS IN - OTHER 767,791.00 1,082,240 1,160,000 1,444,431 4.2% TOTAL TRANSFERS IN 3,445,127.00 4,619,556 5,355,591 5,778,348 16.9% TOTAL REVENUES 29,939,172 28,671,242.00 33,311,360 34,175,585 100.0%

EXPENDITURES
SALARIES 5,742,100.00 6,366,841 7,243,704 7,623,394 22.3% BENEFITS 1,407,390.00 1,538,978 1,799,628 1,950,636 5.7% RETIREMENT (CalPERS) 817,591.00 968,877 1,163,491 1,253,271 3.7% RETIREE MEDICAL (OPEB) 521,991.00 540,408 538,908 461,170 1.4% TOTAL PERSONNEL 9,415,104 8,489,072.00 10,745,731 11,288,471 33.0% SUPPLIES AND SERVICES 6,760,707.00 7,887,622 9,313,231 8,752,471 25.6% INTERNAL SERVICE FEES 2,132,347.00 2,290,588 2,408,212 2,548,788 7.5% DEBT SERVICE 505,588.00 507,098 507,150 509,751 1.5%
SHERIFF CONTRACT 8,474,338.00 9,409,148 9,759,801 10,528,153 30.8% UTILITES 496,109.00 568,470 630,400 667,507 2.0%
CAPITAL OUTLAY 155,874.00 154,616 125,045 52,500 0.2%
MISCELLANEOUS (84,268.00) (204,093) (210,510) (205,356) TOTAL NON-PERSONNEL 20,613,449 18,440,695.00 22,533,329 22,853,814 66.9%

TRANSFERS OUT - CAPITAL PROJECTS - - - -
TRANSFERS OUT - OTHER 5,479,976.00 31,387 32,300 33,300 TOTAL TRANSFERS OUT 31,387 5,479,976.00 32,300 33,300 0.1% TOTAL EXPENDITURES 30,059,940 32,409,743.00 33,311,360 34,175,585 100.0% Revenues Less Expenditures (3,738,501.00) (120,768) - - Total Fund Balance 11,561,991.00 11,441,223 11,441,223 11,441,223 Proposed Budget General Fund Revenues and Expenditures
99 REVENUES 2023-24 Actuals 2024-25 Actuals
2025-26 Estimated
Actuals
2026-27 Budget
(Proposed)
PROPERTY TAX 705,681 736,087 828,050 767,300
SALES TAX 1,932,281 1,932,158 1,620,000 1,720,000
TOTAL TAX REVENUES 2,637,962 2,668,245 2,448,050 2,487,300

LICENSES AND PERMITS - - - -
INTERGOVERNMENTAL 4,537,711 4,100,270 5,805,218 7,269,416 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 8,442 13,444 30,509 18,881
INVESTMENT EARNINGS (INTEREST AND RENTS) 779,090 1,030,877 601,962 594,334 MISCELLANEOUS 128,131 120,950 25,000 137,400
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES 5,453,374 5,265,541 6,462,689 8,020,031 TRANSFERS IN - OTHER 1,966,838 31,387 32,300 33,300
TOTAL REVENUES 10,058,174 7,965,173 8,943,039 10,540,631

EXPENDITURES
SALARIES - - - 216,016
BENEFITS - - - 97,146
RETIREMENT (CalPERS) - - - 40,100

RETIREE MEDICAL (OPEB) - - - -
TOTAL PERSONNEL - - - 353,262
SUPPLIES AND SERVICES 1,212,751 982,260 1,412,511 1,048,650

DEBT SERVICE - - - -
UTILITES 133,115 144,066 228,200 241,191
CAPITAL OUTLAY - - 82,565 -
TOTAL NON-PERSONNEL 1,345,866 1,126,326 1,723,276 1,289,841 TRANSFERS OUT - CAPITAL PROJECTS 5,838,560 5,073,915 7,149,739 11,908,074 TRANSFERS OUT - OTHER 838,530 1,064,605 1,490,000 2,059,431 TOTAL TRANSFERS OUT 6,677,090 6,138,520 8,639,739 13,967,505 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 8,022,956 7,264,846 10,363,015 15,610,608 Revenues Less Expenditures 2,035,218 700,327 (1,419,976) (5,069,977) Total Fund Balance 17,070,662 17,770,989 16,351,013 11,281,036 Proposed Budget Special Revenue Funds Revenues and Expenditures 100

REVENUES
2023-24
Actuals 2024-25 Actuals
2025-26 Estimated
Actuals
2026-27 Budget
(Proposed)
CHARGES FOR SERVICES 1,515,249.00 2,299,397 6,079,629 3,881,352 INVESTMENT EARNINGS (INTEREST AND RENTS) 467,138.00 642,606 510,774 403,675 INTERGOVERNMENTAL 2,403,881.00 - - 6,750,150
MISCELLANEOUS - 512,336 - -
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES 4,386,268.00 3,454,339 6,590,403 11,035,177

TRANSFERS IN - GASOLINE TAX - - -
TRANSFERS IN - CAPITAL PROJECTS 5,909,591.00 12,016,712 12,740,226 26,256,661 TRANSFERS IN - OTHER 4,937,000.00 - - -
TOTAL TRANSFERS IN 10,846,591.00 12,016,712 12,740,226 26,256,661 TOTAL REVENUES 15,232,859.00 15,471,051 19,330,629 37,291,838

EXPENDITURES
SUPPLIES AND SERVICES 1,886,144.00 75,651 159,547 -

DEBT SERVICE - - - -
CAPITAL OUTLAY 4,112,358.00 12,410,849 13,194,657 30,119,648 TOTAL NON-PERSONNEL 5,998,502.00 12,486,500 13,354,204 30,119,648 TRANSFERS OUT - CAPITAL PROJECTS 2,592,416.00 1,843,555 4,388,910 13,069,774 TRANSFERS OUT - OTHER 1,973,167.00 - - -
TOTAL TRANSFERS OUT 4,565,583.00 1,843,555 4,388,910 13,069,774 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 10,564,085.00 14,330,055 17,743,114 43,189,422 Revenues Less Expenditures 4,668,774.00 1,140,996 1,587,515 (5,897,584) Total Fund Balance 17,804,827.00 18,945,823 20,533,338 14,635,754 Proposed Budget Capital Projects Funds Revenues and Expenditures 101
REVENUES 2023-24 Actuals 2024-25 Actuals
2025-26 Estimated
Actuals
2025-26 Budget
(Proposed)

INVESTMENT EARNINGS (INTEREST AND RENTS) - - - -

MISCELLANEOUS - - - -

TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES - - - -

TRANSFERS IN - INTERFUND FOR SUPPORT SERVICES - - - -
TRANSFERS IN - OTHER 505,588.00 507,098.00 507,150.00 509,751.00 TOTAL TRANSFERS IN 505,588.00 507,098.00 507,150.00 509,751.00 TOTAL REVENUES 505,588.00 507,098.00 507,150.00 509,751.00

EXPENDITURES
DEBT SERVICE 505,588.00 507,098.00 507,150.00 509,751.00

TRANSFERS OUT - OTHER - - - -
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 505,588.00 507,098.00 507,150.00 509,751.00 Revenues Less Expenditures - - - -
Total Fund Balance - - - -
Proposed Budget Debt Service Funds Revenues and Expenditures 102
REVENUES 2023-24 Actuals 2024-25 Actuals
2025-26 Estimated
Actuals
2026-27 Budget
(Proposed)
FINES, FORFEITURES, AND PENALTIES 101,201.00 134,645.00 140,000.00 121,500.00 INTERGOVERNMENTAL 12,577.00 4,649.00 - -
CHARGES FOR SERVICES 13,098,247.00 12,175,623.00 13,495,465.00 14,069,650.00 INVESTMENT EARNINGS (INTEREST AND RENTS) 1,014,345.00 1,342,782.00 864,029.00 842,449.00 MISCELLANEOUS 354,417.00 692,900.00 600,000.00 451,000.00 TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES 14,580,787.00 14,350,599.00 15,099,494.00 15,484,599.00

TRANSFERS IN - CAPITAL PROJECTS - - -
INTRA-FUND TRANSFERS IN 89,171.00 92,812.00 99,732.00 8,021,729.00 TOTAL TRANSFERS IN 89,171.00 92,812.00 99,732.00 8,021,729.00 TOTAL REVENUES 14,669,958.00 14,443,411.00 15,199,226.00 23,506,328.00

EXPENSES
SALARIES 1,101,146.00 1,379,125.00 1,471,735.00 1,628,895.00 BENEFITS 372,195.00 520,424.00 440,863.00 525,741.00
RETIREMENT (CalPERS) 148,760.00 182,983.00 211,868.00 269,265.00 RETIREE MEDICAL (OPEB) 473,906.00 159,615.00 122,130.00 98,383.00 TOTAL PERSONNEL 2,096,007.00 2,242,147.00 2,246,596.00 2,522,284.00 SUPPLIES AND SERVICES 3,566,100.00 4,411,733.00 5,764,235.00 5,684,400.00 INTERNAL SERVICE FEES 830,686.00 1,097,992.00 934,738.00 962,234.00 DEBT SERVICE 212,277.00 217,741.00 196,662.00 209,786.00 UTILITES 88,814.00 97,970.00 86,740.00 94,108.00
CAPITAL OUTLAY 2,170,261.00 1,494,976.00 461,832.00 8,047,514.00 MISCELLANEOUS (228,669.00) (114,386.00) - (162,351.00)
TOTAL NON-PERSONNEL 6,639,469.00 7,206,026.00 7,444,207.00 14,835,691.00 TRANSFERS OUT - CAPITAL PROJECTS 64,569.00 4,453,512.00 1,091,765.00 805,095.00 TRANSFERS OUT - OTHER 1,311,877.00 1,918,637.00 1,569,943.00 1,738,407.00 INTRA-FUND TRANSFERS OUT 89,171.00 92,812.00 99,732.00 8,021,729.00 TOTAL TRANSFERS OUT 1,465,617.00 6,464,961.00 2,761,440.00 10,565,231.00 TOTAL EXPENSES 10,201,093.00 15,913,134.00 12,452,243.00 27,923,206.00 Revenues Less Expenses 4,468,865.00 (1,469,723.00) 2,746,983.00 (4,416,878.00) Total Net Position 43,707,126.00 42,237,403.00 44,984,386.00 40,567,508.00 Proposed Budget Water Enterprises Funds Revenues and Expenditures 103
REVENUES 2023-24 Actuals 2024-25 Actuals
2025-26 Estimated
Actuals
2026-27 Budget
(Proposed)
FINES, FORFEITURES, AND PENALTIES 58,583.00 78,598.00 100,000.00 73,000.00

INTERGOVERNMENTAL - - - -
CHARGES FOR SERVICES 10,164,355.00 7,529,376.00 8,492,293.00 9,240,474.00 INVESTMENT EARNINGS (INTEREST AND RENTS) 539,368.00 475,437.00 295,344.00 232,476.00 MISCELLANEOUS 28,293.00 37,274.00 15,000.00 35,800.00
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES 10,790,599.00 8,120,685.00 8,902,637.00 9,581,750.00

TRANSFERS IN - INTERFUND FOR SUPPORT SERVICES - - - -
TRANSFERS IN - CAPITAL PROJECTS 26,043.00 - - -

TRANSFERS IN - OTHER - - - -
INTRA-FUND TRANSFERS IN 421,910.00 401,923.00 304,485.00 4,856,952.00 TOTAL TRANSFERS IN 447,953.00 401,923.00 304,485.00 4,856,952.00 TOTAL REVENUES 11,238,552.00 8,522,608.00 9,207,122.00 14,438,702.00

EXPENSES
SALARIES 1,227,797.00 1,377,080.00 1,465,357.00 1,608,738.00 BENEFITS 474,784.00 473,914.00 393,811.00 491,239.00
RETIREMENT (CalPERS) 198,585.00 233,198.00 277,360.00 297,531.00 RETIREE MEDICAL (OPEB) 190,951.00 164,507.00 128,962.00 104,170.00 TOTAL PERSONNEL 2,092,117.00 2,248,699.00 2,265,490.00 2,501,678.00 SUPPLIES AND SERVICES 902,915.00 910,779.00 1,189,729.00 1,295,245.00 INTERNAL SERVICE FEES 763,841.00 867,867.00 660,516.00 810,506.00 DEBT SERVICE 266,834.00 277,857.00 251,434.00 275,082.00 UTILITES 326,842.00 350,210.00 371,550.00 403,371.00
CAPITAL OUTLAY 310,372.00 1,357,024.00 1,247,886.00 6,482,553.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,425,796.00 644,617.00 - (199,515.00)
TOTAL NON-PERSONNEL 3,996,600.00 4,408,354.00 3,721,115.00 9,067,242.00 TRANSFERS OUT - CAPITAL PROJECTS 66,990.00 645,730.00 (4,531.00) 223,718.00 TRANSFERS OUT - OTHER 1,101,410.00 1,362,623.00 1,614,215.00 1,751,810.00 INTRA-FUND TRANSFERS OUT 421,910.00 401,923.00 304,485.00 4,856,952.00 TOTAL TRANSFERS OUT 1,590,310.00 2,410,276.00 1,914,169.00 6,832,480.00 TOTAL EXPENSES 7,679,027.00 9,067,329.00 7,900,774.00 18,401,400.00 Revenues Less Expenses 3,559,525.00 (544,721.00) 1,306,348.00 (3,962,698.00) Total Net Position 34,202,187.00 33,657,466.00 34,963,814.00 31,001,116.00 Proposed Budget Wastewater Enterprises Funds Revenues and Expenditures 104
REVENUES 2023-24 Actuals 2024-25 Actuals
2025-26 Estimated
Actuals
2025-26 Budget
(Proposed)
CHARGES FOR SERVICES 1,586,059.00 817,886.00 450,000.00 418,200.00 INVESTMENT EARNINGS (INTEREST AND RENTS) 5,254.00 16.00 27.00 25.00

MISCELLANEOUS - - - -
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES 1,591,313.00 817,902.00 450,027.00 418,225.00 TRANSFERS IN - CAPITAL PROJECTS 2,617,322.00 - - -
INTRA-FUND TRANSFERS IN (55,623.00) 13,937.00 47,598.00 671,441.00 TOTAL TRANSFERS IN 2,561,699.00 13,937.00 47,598.00 671,441.00 TOTAL REVENUES 4,153,012.00 831,839.00 497,625.00 1,089,666.00

EXPENSES -
SALARIES 298,746.00 245,632.00 253,899.00 179,573.00
BENEFITS 265,702.00 74,611.00 89,603.00 62,945.00
RETIREMENT (CalPERS) 33,224.00 34,190.00 44,410.00 33,922.00 RETIREE MEDICAL (OPEB) 11,673.00 4,530.00 22,206.00 10,851.00 TOTAL PERSONNEL 609,345.00 358,963.00 410,118.00 287,291.00 SUPPLIES AND SERVICES 93,704.00 182,298.00 142,800.00 169,150.00 INTERNAL SERVICE FEES 63,571.00 59,810.00 56,004.00 58,472.00 DEBT SERVICE 211,757.00 64,866.00 66,351.00 59,500.00
UTILITIES & MAINTENANCE - - 300.00 737.00
CAPITAL OUTLAY 2,561,699.00 105,561.00 47,598.00 671,440.00 MISCELLANEOUS (2,273,120.00) 396,935.00 - -
TOTAL NON-PERSONNEL 657,611.00 809,470.00 313,053.00 959,299.00

TRANSFERS OUT - CAPITAL PROJECTS - - - -
TRANSFERS OUT - OTHER 193,310.00 273,692.00 461,433.00 228,700.00 INTRA-FUND TRANSFERS OUT (55,624.00) 13,937.00 47,598.00 671,441.00 TOTAL TRANSFERS OUT 137,686.00 287,629.00 509,031.00 900,141.00 TOTAL EXPENSES 1,404,642.00 1,456,062.00 1,232,202.00 2,146,731.00 Revenues Less Expenses 2,748,370.00 (624,223.00) (734,577.00) (1,057,065.00) Total Net Position 1,431,924.00 807,701.00 73,124.00 (983,941.00) Proposed Budget Recycled Water Enterprises Funds Revenues and Expenditures 105
REVENUES 2023-24 Actuals 2024-25 Actuals
2025-26 Estimated
Actuals
2026-27 Budget
(Proposed)
CHARGES FOR SERVICES 4,311,007.00 4,326,007.00 4,089,470.00 4,380,000.00 INVESTMENT EARNINGS (INTEREST AND RENTS) 73,288.00 71,703.00 61,945.00 35,856.00 MISCELLANEOUS 50,750.00 35,750.00 58,120.00 40,000.00
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES 4,435,045.00 4,433,460.00 4,209,535.00 4,455,856.00

TRANSFERS IN - CAPITAL PROJECTS - - -

TRANSFERS IN - OTHER - - -
TOTAL REVENUES 4,435,045.00 4,433,460.00 4,209,535.00 4,455,856.00

EXPENSES
SALARIES 346,039.00 346,039.00 351,203.00 364,128.00
BENEFITS 120,985.00 120,985.00 99,317.00 109,575.00
RETIREMENT (CalPERS) 58,474.00 58,474.00 80,480.00 62,961.00 RETIREE MEDICAL (OPEB) 32,969.00 32,969.00 24,768.00 19,894.00 TOTAL PERSONNEL 558,467.00 558,467.00 555,768.00 556,558.00 SUPPLIES AND SERVICES 2,734,208.00 2,734,208.00 2,896,292.00 2,766,870.00 DEBT SERVICE 558,810.00 558,810.00 569,000.00 567,200.00 UTILITES 176,557.00 176,557.00 192,600.00 203,780.00
CAPITAL OUTLAY 145,464.00 145,464.00 229,723.00 262,100.00 MISCELLANEOUS (185,981.00) (185,981.00) - -
TRANSFERS OUT - CAPITAL PROJECTS - - 114,343.00 250,000.00 TOTAL NON-PERSONNEL 3,429,058.00 3,429,058.00 4,001,958.00 4,049,950.00 TOTAL EXPENSES 3,987,525.00 3,987,525.00 4,557,726.00 4,606,508.00 Revenues Less Expenses 447,520.00 445,935.00 (348,191.00) (150,652.00) - - -
Total Net Position 1,354,209.00 1,800,144.00 1,451,953.00 1,301,301.00 Proposed Budget Internal Service Funds Revenues and Expenditures 106
Fund Number and Description June 30, 2025
Fund Balance
FY 2025-26
Estimated
Revenues
FY 2025-26
Estimated
Expenses
FY 2025-26
Estimated
Fund Balance
FY 2026-27
Proposed
Revenues
FY 2026-27
Proposed
Expenses
FY 2026-27
Budgeted
Fund Balance
100 GENERAL FUND 10,349,077.35 31,943,253.00 32,132,860.00 10,159,470.35 32,836,248.00 32,882,700.00 10,113,018.35 105 DEVELOPER PROJECTS 990,563.66 1,368,107.00 1,178,500.00 1,180,170.66 1,339,337.00 1,292,885.00 1,226,622.66 210 STORM DRAIN/MEASURE A 5,324,125.02 198,673.00 1,761,256.00 3,761,542.02 206,687.00 2,407,104.00 1,561,125.02 211 MEASURE U 6,363,630.04 1,796,709.00 1,922,072.00 6,238,267.04 1,853,683.00 4,449,203.00 3,642,747.04 212 GAS TAX/ROAD MAINTENANCE 749,114.63 617,348.00 619,106.00 747,356.63 640,802.00 1,075,808.00 312,350.63 213 GAS TAX RMRA 929,240.10 589,049.00 - 1,518,289.10 607,865.00 - 2,126,154.10 215 CALHOME PROGRAM 13,501.54 384.00 - 13,885.54 30,278.00 5,000.00 39,163.54 216 CDBG - REHAB LOAN PROGRAM 98,094.52 2,771.00 - 100,865.52 4,391.00 1,000.00 104,256.52 217 HOME PROGRAM (534,980.99) 864,981.00 330,000.00 0.01 105,000.00 30,000.00 75,000.01 218 STATE SUPP LAW ENF (COPS) 4,649.78 200,136.00 200,000.00 4,785.78 203,116.00 203,000.00 4,901.78 220 BEGIN PROGRAM 146,307.48 4,254.00 - 150,561.48 33,062.00 10,000.00 173,623.48 226 TFCA GRANT (60,723.57) 99,767.00 115,811.00 (76,767.57) 260,960.00 184,189.00 3.43 230 STATE GRANTS (90,846.02) 82,565.00 289,449.44 (297,730.46) 703,235.00 405,503.00 1.54 240 FEDERAL GRANTS (51,555.22) 3,387,602.00 3,669,228.00 (333,181.22) 4,919,342.00 4,587,042.00 (881.22) 252 NEWELL OPEN SPACE PRESERVE 153,043.51 17,383.00 - 170,426.51 17,167.00 105,500.00 82,093.51 254 LAVIGNE OPEN SPACE MAINTEN 190,752.89 5,447.00 - 196,199.89 3,928.00 - 200,127.89 261 LLAD Zone 1, LaVigne 544,217.40 315,834.00 355,747.00 504,304.40 232,750.00 468,541.00 268,513.40 262 LLAD Zone 2, Vintage Ranch 1,074,143.26 376,910.00 570,184.00 880,869.26 385,849.00 907,850.00 358,868.26 263 LLAD Zone 3, Napa Junction 1,827,502.89 231,448.00 131,000.00 1,927,950.89 226,342.00 334,395.00 1,819,897.89 275 GP UPDATE FEE FUND (171,063.02) 30,509.00 330,952.00 (471,506.02) 18,881.00 - (452,625.02) 280 CANNABIS FUND (14,631.87) - - (14,631.87) - - (14,631.87) 281 COMM FACILITIES DIST FUND 276,968.42 65,921.00 50,600.00 292,289.42 65,534.00 89,808.00 268,015.42 282 LEGAL SETTLEMENT 881,246.78 27,134.00 17,610.00 890,770.78 19,553.00 345,165.00 565,158.78 283 NATIONAL OPIOID SETTLEMENT 118,251.52 28,214.00 - 146,465.52 2,206.00 1,500.00 147,171.52 310 PARKS IMPACT FEE FUND 1,971,974.40 2,112,752.00 669,579.50 3,415,146.90 1,218,632.00 2,541,982.00 2,091,796.90 320 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE FUND 5,304,692.48 1,671,633.00 (33,962.00) 7,010,287.48 2,417,664.00 4,969,767.00 4,458,184.48 330 CIVIC IMPACT FEE FUND 1,400,286.23 46,602.00 194,398.00 1,252,490.23 33,359.00 780,379.00 505,470.23 340 AFFORDABLE HOUSING 1,398,468.14 1,539,779.00 186,700.00 2,751,547.14 372,819.00 - 3,124,366.14 350 CAPITAL PROJECTS 1,326,953.50 12,786,083.00 13,007,957.00 1,105,079.50 26,287,467.00 30,119,648.00 (2,727,101.50) 360 AMCAN RD E ASSMT DIST 359,933.41 1,022.00 - 360,955.41 737.00 - 361,692.41 370 ZERO WATER FOOTPRINT 33,346.21 3,032.00 - 36,378.21 103,404.00 - 139,782.21 380 UTILITY UNDERGROUND FUND 414,520.87 11,837.00 - 426,357.87 7,879.00 - 434,236.87 381 COMM FACILITIES DIST CIP FUND (889,339.32) 1,019,313.00 3,426,620.00 (3,296,646.32) 6,750,150.00 3,464,100.00 (10,596.32) 420 CABERNET VILLAGE LSE DS - 468,638.00 468,638.00 - 468,640.00 468,640.00 - 440 ENGIE EQUIP/LEASE DEBT SVC - 38,512.00 38,512.00 - 41,111.00 41,111.00 - FY 2026-27 Recommended Budget Fund Balance Projections
107
Fund Number and Description June 30, 2025
Fund Balance
FY 2025-26
Estimated
Revenues
FY 2025-26
Estimated
Expenses
FY 2025-26
Estimated
Fund Balance
FY 2026-27
Proposed
Revenues
FY 2026-27
Proposed
Expenses
FY 2026-27
Budgeted
Fund Balance
FY 2026-27 Recommended Budget Fund Balance Projections
510 WATER OPERATIONS (Working Capital) 11,215,028.00 7,364,884.00 12,215,429.45 6,364,482.55 12,025,711.00 13,431,629.00 4,958,564.55 515 WTR DEBT SERVICE FUND (1,034,261.94) 17,900.00 92,942.00 (1,109,303.94) 99,214.00 16,494.00 (1,026,583.94) 520 WATER CAPACITY FEE FUND 8,204,652.81 3,884,466.00 62,040.00 12,027,078.81 3,458,888.00 6,552,569.00 8,933,397.81 530 WATER CIP 869,214.99 81,832.00 81,832.00 869,214.99 7,922,515.00 7,922,514.00 869,215.99 540 WASTEWATER OPERATIONS (Working Capital) 6,796,586.00 5,656,033.00 7,251,775.36 5,200,843.64 7,744,970.00 10,185,517.00 2,760,296.64 545 WW DEBT SERVICE FUND (2,654,738.34) 43,173.00 224,169.00 (2,835,734.34) 39,781.00 39,781.00 (2,835,734.34) 550 WASTEWATER CAPACITY FEE 7,043,450.52 2,092,521.00 238,517.00 8,897,454.52 1,826,908.00 2,265,508.00 8,458,854.52 560 WW CIP (410,509.25) 186,312.00 186,312.00 (410,509.25) 4,642,171.00 5,392,172.00 (1,160,510.25) 570 WW CAPITAL RESERVE 511,248.11 88,530.00 - 599,778.11 84,872.00 418,422.00 266,228.11 580 RECYCLED WATER FUND 806,692.19 450,000.00 1,184,604.00 72,088.19 418,200.00 1,475,291.00 (985,002.81) 590 RECYCLED WATER CIP 1,006.64 47,625.00 47,598.00 1,033.64 671,466.00 671,440.00 1,059.64 651 ISF - BLDG MAINTENANCE 715,124.83 1,028,740.00 1,351,536.00 392,328.83 1,316,380.00 1,357,196.00 351,512.83 652 ISF - FLEET 448,574.90 1,418,057.00 1,487,414.00 379,217.90 1,347,066.00 1,435,934.00 290,349.90 653 ISF - INFO TECHNOLOGY 914,907.79 1,134,269.00 1,368,775.53 680,401.26 1,412,410.00 1,433,378.00 659,433.26 654 ISF - LEGAL SERVICES (278,463.82) 628,469.00 350,000.00 5.18 380,000.00 380,000.00 5.18 655 ISF - PARKS RENO & REPL 2,596,453.08 75,576.00 213,477.00 2,458,552.08 54,420.00 1,160,991.00 1,351,981.08 656 ISF - STREETS RENO & REPL 1,523,779.30 44,312.00 - 1,568,091.30 31,895.00 - 1,599,986.30 657 ISF - CIVIC FACILITIES RENO & REPL 439,457.92 12,780.00 78,344.00 373,893.92 9,199.00 110,000.00 273,092.92 658 ISF - PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING RENO & REPL 197,294.62 5,908.00 - 203,202.62 4,213.00 42,555.00 164,860.62 659 ISF - PENSION STABILIZATION 101,585.25 2,954.00 - 104,539.25 2,126.00 - 106,665.25 Total $ 86,114,225 $ 91,208,640 $ 88,171,320 $ 89,151,544 $ 126,026,572 $ 148,640,951 $ 66,537,166 108
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-______
ADOPTING THE FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEARS 2026-27 TO 2030-31 WHEREAS, the City of American Canyon has prepared a Five-Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) which sets forth a funding strategy for proposed capital projects; and WHEREAS, the CIP is a planning tool that identifies anticipated capital improvements for fiscal years 2026- 27 to 2030-31; and
WHEREAS, the CIP also identifies the funding sources to finance the capital improvements proposed to be undertaken in the next five fiscal years and includes recommended time schedules and cost estimates of the various capital improvement projects; and
WHEREAS, the expenditures shown for the first year of the CIP comprise the Capital Budget starting in fiscal year 2026-27. Subsequent years are also included in the CIP, although these “future years” are subject to change due to more detailed engineering analysis becoming available, possible changes in project priorities, updates or revisions to anticipated revenues, and/or changes in cost and funding projections; and
WHEREAS, the CIP is anticipated to be updated annually, as a whole, and amendments can be considered by the City Council at any time; and
WHEREAS, City Council of the City of American Canyon has designated the City Planning Commission as the planning agency for the City of American Canyon; and WHEREAS, State Law requires that designated planning agencies review their agency’s capital improvement plan to ensure compliance with the adopted General Plan; and WHEREAS, on May 28, 2026, the Planning Commission, during a regularly scheduled meeting, considered the projects and programs for FY 2026-27 in the City’s Capital Improvement Program and their conformity to the adopted City General Plan.

WHEREAS, project funds have been identified in the proposed operating budget for Fiscal Year 2026-27.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of American Canyon City Council does resolve as follows:

1. The Five-Year Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Years 2026-27 to 2030-31 is hereby adopted.

PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council of the City of American Canyon held on the 2nd day of June, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

109
____________________________
Pierre Washington, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVE AS TO FORM:

____________________________ _____________________________ Taresa Geilfuss, CMC, City Clerk Matthew T. Summers, City Attorney 110
$1,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$718,800 $0 $0 $0 $0
$42,555 $0 $0 $0 $0
$184,189 $0 $0 $0 $0
$110,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0
$2,805,544 $1,000,000 $100,000 $0 $0
Capital Projects
CF27-0100 -

CORPORATIONN YARD

PAVING ANND STORM

DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS
CF27-0200 - City Hall
Repainting and Fascia
Improvements
CF24-0200 - NAPA

RIVER ECOLOGY CENTER

SITE IMPROVEMENTS
CF25-0100 - PD

PARKING LOT
CF26-0100 - EV

CHARGING STATIONS
CF26-0200 - CITY

MONUMENT SIGN

REPLACEMENT
CF28-0100 - CITY HALL

EMERGENCY

GENERATOR UPGRADE
CF29-0100 - CITY HALL

HVAC REPLACEMENT

CAPITAL PROJECTS
TOTAL
Proposed Budget FY 2026-27 Projected FY 2027-28 Projected FY 2028-29 Projected FY 2029-30 Projected FY 2030-31 City of American Canyon
Civic Facilities Projects
111
$854,438 $0 $0 $0 $0
$184,189 $0 $0 $0 $0
$345,165 $0 $0 $0 $0
$780,379 $0 $0 $0 $0
$110,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$42,555 $0 $0 $0 $0
$119,409 $0 $0 $0 $0
$119,409 $0 $0 $0 $0
$250,000 $1,000,000 $100,000 $0 $0
$2,805,544 $1,000,000 $100,000 $0 $0
Fund Source
210 - STORM

DRAIN/MEASURE A
226 - TFCA GRANT
282 - LEGAL

SETTLEMENT
330 - CIVIC IMPACT FEE
FUND
657 - CIVIC FACILITIES

RENOVATION &

REPLACEMENT
658 - PUBLIC SAFETY

BUILDING RENOVATION
& REPLACEMENT
510 - WATER

OPERATIONS
540 - WASTEWATER

OPERATIONS
651 - ISF - BLDG

MAINTENANCE

FUND SOURCE TOTAL
Proposed Budget FY 2026-27 Projected FY 2027-28 Projected FY 2028-29 Projected FY 2029-30 Projected FY 2030-31 City of American Canyon
Civic Facilities Projects Fund Source
112
$50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$66,840 $0 $0 $0 $0
$699,873 $0 $0 $0 $0
$490,644 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $60,000 $660,000 $2,630,000 $0
$366,991 $0 $0 $0 $0
$184,891 $0 $0 $0 $0
$349,422 $1,109,750 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $350,000 $0 $0
$0 $0 $255,000 $0 $0
$531,550 $0 $0 $0 $0
$815,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$334,686 $1,200,000 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $200,000 $0 $0
$0 $0 $600,000 $2,500,000 $0
$4,039,897 $2,369,750 $2,065,000 $5,130,000 $0
Capital Projects
PR27-0100 - CLARK

RANCH POWER

IMPROVEMENTS
PR19-0100 - WETLANDS

EDGE ENVIRONMENTAL
ED
PR23-0100 - MELVIN

PARK IMPROVEMENTS
PR23-0200 - MELVIN

TENNIS COURT

IMPROVEMENTS
PR23-0300 - AQUATIC

FACILITY

IMPROVEMENTS
PR23-0500 -

NORTHAMPTON PARK

RESTROOM
PR23-0700 - SILVER OAK

PARK RESTROOM
PR24-0100 - LINWOOD

PARK IMPROVEMENTS
PR24-0200 -

RECREATION CENTER

UPGRADES
PR25-0100 - NEWELL

OPEN SPACE BATHROOM
PR25-0400 - VETERANS

PARK PLAYGROUND R&R
PR25-0500 - COMM

PARK I PLAYGROUND
R&R
PR25-0600 - MAIN

STREET PARK

IMPROVEMENTS
PR26-0100 - WETLANDS

RESTORATION AND

PUBLIC ACCESS

PROJECT
PR29-0100 - WETLANDS

EDGE PARKING LOT

EXPANSION
PR29-0200 - RIO

GRANDE PARK

IMPROVEMENTS

CAPITAL PROJECTS
TOTAL
Proposed Budget FY 2026-27 Projected FY 2027-28 Projected FY 2028-29 Projected FY 2029-30 Projected FY 2030-31 City of American Canyon
Parks Projects
113
$2,033 $1,200,000 $0 $0 $0
$184,891 $0 $0 $0 $0
$150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$2,541,982 $1,169,750 $200,000 $0 $0
$1,160,991 $0 $1,260,000 $2,500,000 $0
$0 $0 $605,000 $2,630,000 $0
$4,039,897 $2,369,750 $2,065,000 $5,130,000 $0
Fund Source
230 - STATE GRANTS
262 - LLAD Zone 2,
Vintage Ranch
263 - LLAD Zone 3, Napa
Junction
310 - PARKS IMPACT FEE
FUND
655 - PARKS

RENOVATION &

REPLACEMENT
000 - UNFUNDED CIP

FUND SOURCE TOTAL
Proposed Budget FY 2026-27 Projected FY 2027-28 Projected FY 2028-29 Projected FY 2029-30 Projected FY 2030-31 City of American Canyon
Parks Projects Fund Source
114
$8,421,027 $0 $0 $0 $0
$1,300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$5,293,755 $0 $0 $0 $0
$371,808 $0 $0 $0 $0
$420,273 $0 $0 $0 $0
$199,690 $400,000 $0 $0 $0
$2,182,887 $0 $0 $0 $0
$4,969,767 $0 $0 $0 $0
$115,000 $1,673,750 $0 $0 $0
$0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $0
$0 $500,000 $2,000,000 $0 $0
$0 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $2,000,000 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $2,000,000
$0 $0 $835,730 $0 $0
$23,274,207 $4,573,750 $4,835,730 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 Capital Projects
TR16-0700 - GREEN ISLAND RD

RECON&WIDENING
TR16-0704 - GREEN ISLAND

ROAD CLASS I TRAIL
TR23-0200 - SOUTH KELLYHWY 29 INTERSECTION
TR23-0300 - EASTAMERICAN

CANYON ROAD GUARDRAIL
TR24-0200 - MELVIN SIDEWALK
TR25-0100 - RANCHO PHASE II
TR26-0100 - CITYWIDE

PAVEMENT REJUVENATION

PROJECT
TR26-0200 - RIO DEL MAR

EXTENSION
TR27-0100 - MELVIN ROAD

PAVEMENT REHABILITATION
TR28-0100 - CITYWIDE

PAVEMENT REJUVENATION
PROJECT FY 28
TR28-0200 - THERESAAVENUE

REHABILITATION
TR29-0100 - CITYWIDE

PAVEMENT REJUVENATION
PROJECT FY 29
TR30-0100 - TR30-0100-
Citywide Pavement Rejuvenation
Project FY 30
TR31-0100 - TR31-0100-
Citywide Pavement Rejuvenation
Project FY 31
TR16-1100 - E AMCAN RD

SIDEWALK

CAPITAL PROJECTS TOTAL
Proposed Budget FY 2026-27 Projected FY 2027-28 Projected FY 2028-29 Projected FY 2029-30 Projected FY 2030-31 City of American Canyon
Transportation
115
$714,305 $0 $0 $0 $0
$4,214,203 $2,500,750 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000
$671,808 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $500,000 $0 $0 $0
$0 $1,333,000 $0 $0 $0
$4,587,042 $0 $0 $0 $0
$4,969,767 $0 $0 $0 $0
$3,862,987 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $335,730 $0 $0
$3,464,100 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $1,500,000 $0 $0
$685,686 $160,000 $0 $0 $0
$104,309 $80,000 $0 $0 $0
$23,274,207 $4,573,750 $4,835,730 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 Fund Source
210 - STORM

DRAIN/MEASURE A
211 - MEASURE T/U
212 - GAS TAX/ROAD

MAINTENANCE
213 - GAS TAX RMRA
230 - STATE GRANTS
240 - FEDERAL GRANTS
320 - TRAFFIC IMPACT

FEE FUND
350 - CAPITAL PROJECTS
360 - AMCAN RD E

ASSMT DIST
381 - COMM FACILITIES

DIST - CIP
000 - UNFUNDED CIP
510 - WATER

OPERATIONS
540 - WASTEWATER

OPERATIONS

FUND SOURCE TOTAL
Proposed Budget FY 2026-27 Projected FY 2027-28 Projected FY 2028-29 Projected FY 2029-30 Projected FY 2030-31 City of American Canyon
Transportation Projects Fund Source
116
$75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$349,315 $0 $0 $0 $0
$145,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$6,473,962 $0 $0 $0 $0
$300,000 $900,000 $0 $0 $0
$314,238 $0 $0 $0 $0
$90,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$7,922,515 $900,000 $0 $0 $0
Capital Projects
WA23-0100 - WATER

TREATMENT PLANT
SHOP
WA23-0200 - WATER

TREATMENT FILTER

MEDIA REPL &

UNDERDRAIN REPAIR
WA24-0200 - NORTH

KELLY ROAD WATER

MAIN UPGRADE
WA25-0200 - ZONE 5

PUMP STATION
WA26-0100 -

NORTHAMPTON WATER

MAIN REPLACEMENT
WA26-0200 - SCADA

WATER TREATMENT
PLANT
WA26-0300 - OAT HILL

FENCING
WA27-0100 - OAT HILL
TANK 1 EXTERIOR

COATING REPAIR
WA27-0200 - 260

MOBILE HOME PARK

SERVICE CONNECTION

CAPITAL PROJECTS
TOTAL
Proposed Budget FY 2026-27 Projected FY 2027-28 Projected FY 2028-29 Projected FY 2029-30 Projected FY 2030-31 City of American Canyon
4 Water
117
$1,398,553 $900,000 $0 $0 $0
$6,523,962 $0 $0 $0 $0
$7,922,515 $900,000 $0 $0 $0
Fund Source
510 - WATER

OPERATIONS
520 - WATER CAPACITY

FEE FUND

FUND SOURCE TOTAL
Proposed Budget FY 2026-27 Projected FY 2027-28 Projected FY 2028-29 Projected FY 2029-30 Projected FY 2030-31 City of American Canyon
Water Projects Fund Source
118
$81,077 $0 $0 $0 $0
$1,790,131 $0 $0 $0 $0
$418,422 $0 $0 $0 $0
$1,219,931 $0 $0 $0 $0
$1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $500,000 $0 $0 $0
$100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $300,000 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $200,000 $0 $0
$0 $500,000 $0 $0 $0
$0 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000
$0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0
$0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0
$0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $2,000,000
$95,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$437,610 $0 $0 $0 $0
$5,492,171 $1,375,000 $575,000 $75,000 $2,075,000
Capital Projects
WW16-0300 - SCADAWATER

RECLAMATION FACILITY
WW20-0100 - SS4 BROADWAY

SEWER REHAB, CRAWFORD TO

DONALDSON
WW24-0100 - ANDREW ROAD

SEWER REPAIR
WW26-0400 - SLUDGE

REMOVALAND HAULING WATER

RECLAMATION FACILITY
WW27-0100 - HIGH STRENGTH
WASTE
WW27-0200 - UV REHAB
WW27-0300 - PROCESS

BLOWER REPLACEMENT
WW27-0400 - MELVIN/WILSON

MAIN REPAIR
WW28-0100 - PLC

REPLACEMENT
WW28-0200 - AIR SEPARATOR

TANK REPLACEMENT
WW28-0300 - SCOUR BLOWER

REPLACEMENT
WW28-0400 - ANNUAL SEWER
LINING
WW29-0100 - BROADWAY
(CARTAGENATO CREEK)
WW29-0200 - WESTPARK MAIN
WW29-0300 - BROADWAY
(NAPAJUNCTION TO RIO DEL
MAR)
WW30-0100 - PLANT

EXPANSION
WW26-0100 - WETLANDS EDGE

SS DEMOLITION
WW26-0200 - BUILDING E

PUMP STATION IMPROVEMENTS

CAPITAL PROJECTS TOTAL
Proposed Budget FY 2026-27 Projected FY 2027-28 Projected FY 2028-29 Projected FY 2029-30 Projected FY 2030-31 City of American Canyon
Wastewater
119
$2,283,618 $1,375,000 $575,000 $75,000 $2,075,000
$2,040,131 $0 $0 $0 $0
$750,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$418,422 $0 $0 $0 $0
$5,492,171 $1,375,000 $575,000 $75,000 $2,075,000
Fund Source
540 - WASTEWATER

OPERATIONS
550 - WASTEWATER

CAPACITY FEES
560 - WW CIP
570 - WW CAPITAL

RESERVE

FUND SOURCE TOTAL
Proposed Budget FY 2026-27 Projected FY 2027-28 Projected FY 2028-29 Projected FY 2029-30 Projected FY 2030-31 City of American Canyon
Wastewater Projects Fund Sources
120
$71,440 $0 $0 $0 $0
$600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$671,440 $0 $0 $0 $0
Capital Projects
RW23-0100 - RECYCLED

WATER REFILL STATION
RW27-0100 - RECYCLED

WATER TANK REHAB

CAPITAL PROJECTS
TOTAL
Proposed Budget FY 2026-27 Projected FY 2027-28 Projected FY 2028-29 Projected FY 2029-30 Projected FY 2030-31 City of American Canyon
Recycled Water Projects
121
$671,440 $0 $0 $0 $0
$671,440 $0 $0 $0 $0
Fund Source
580 - RECYCLED WATER

OPERATIONS

FUND SOURCE TOTAL
Proposed Budget FY 2026-27 Projected FY 2027-28 Projected FY 2028-29 Projected FY 2029-30 Projected FY 2030-31 City of American Canyon
Recycled Water Projects Fund Source
122
2026-27 Budget 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 2031-32

REVENUES
PROPERTY TAX 13,346,900 14,044,516 14,877,709 15,411,767 15,862,893 16,237,907 IN LIEU OF VLF 2,452,365 2,550,460 2,703,488 2,818,386 2,902,938 2,972,609 TOTAL PROPERTY TAX 16,594,976 15,799,265 17,581,197 18,230,153 18,765,831 19,210,516 SALES TAX 3,500,000 3,605,000 3,785,250 3,898,808 4,015,772 4,136,245 TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX 2,000,000 2,060,000 2,121,800 2,721,800 2,776,236 2,831,761 OTHER TAXES 614,200 622,324 633,035 686,937 697,218 705,072 FRANCHISE FEES 1,277,000 1,324,050 1,378,493 1,426,947 1,477,564 1,514,836 LICENSES AND PERMITS 742,000 868,840 786,648 712,440 694,691 701,639 FINES, FORFEITURES, AND PENALTIES 123,000 125,120 127,282 129,638 131,888 134,183 INTERGOVERNMENTAL 92,245 94,455 96,740 99,102 101,545 104,071 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 2,884,284 2,853,333 2,618,434 2,520,503 2,574,653 2,608,696 INVESTMENT EARNINGS (INTEREST AND RENTS) 732,758 669,399 637,090 653,339 670,018 678,268 MISCELLANEOUS 632,485 563,030 572,190 581,533 591,065 602,385 TRANSFERS IN - INTERFUND FOR SUPPORT SERVICES 3,698,917 3,809,886 3,924,184 4,041,909 4,163,168 4,288,063 TRANSFERS IN - OTHER 1,444,431 1,455,672 598,433 604,894 611,549 618,403 TRANSFERS IN - GASOLINE TAX 400,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 TRANSFERS IN - CAPITAL PROJECTS 235,000 - - - - -
TOTAL REVENUES 34,175,585 34,946,085 35,160,776 36,608,003 37,571,198 38,434,138

EXPENSES
SALARIES 7,623,394 7,849,970 8,083,344 8,323,718 8,571,303 8,826,317 BENEFITS 1,950,636 2,034,851 2,120,144 2,208,759 2,301,374 2,398,185 RETIREMENT (CalPERS) 1,253,271 1,303,402 1,342,502 1,382,778 1,424,261 1,466,989 RETIREE MEDICAL (OPEB) 461,170 734,229 753,756 773,819 794,433 815,613 SHERIFF CONTRACT 10,528,153 11,001,920 11,441,997 11,899,677 12,375,664 12,994,447 SUPPLIES AND SERVICES 8,752,471 8,714,091 8,799,022 8,799,675 9,027,431 9,175,078 INTERNAL SERVICE FEES 2,548,788 2,839,663 2,749,919 2,832,414 2,917,384 2,975,729 UTILITES 667,507 694,699 723,068 752,662 783,538 807,043 CAPITAL OUTLAY 52,500 - - - - -
MISCELLANEOUS (205,356) (211,518) (219,979) (228,778) (237,929) (237,905) TRANSFER OUT - DEBT SERVICE 509,751 509,751 509,751 509,751 509,751 509,751 TRANSFERS OUT - OTHER 33,300 34,299 35,328 36,388 37,480 38,604 TOTAL EXPENSES 34,175,585 35,505,357 36,338,852 37,290,863 38,504,690 39,769,851 REVENUES LESS EXPENSES - (559,272) (1,178,076) (682,860) (933,492) (1,335,713) Fund Balance 11,441,223 10,881,951 9,703,875 9,021,015 8,087,523 6,751,810 General Fund 5-Year Forecast
123

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
JUNE 2, 2026

STAFF REPORT

PUBLIC HEARING
ITEM NUMBER: 15.

TITLE
Engineer's Report for Citywide LLAD Fiscal Year 26/27

RECOMMENDATION
Conduct a Public Hearing and adopt a Resolu.on approving the Fiscal Year 2026/27 Annual Engineer’s Report for the American Canyon Landscaping and Ligh.ng Assessment District, approving the budgets within the Engineer's Report, confirming the assessment diagram and the annual assessment amounts, and authorizing the levy and collec.on of annual assessment for Fiscal Year 2026/27.

CONTACT
Erica Ahmann Smithies, P.E., Public Works Director
Noni Thomas, Management Analyst

BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS
This Public Hearing item is for Council’s considera.on regarding the American Canyon Landscaping and Ligh.ng Assessment District (LLAD). NBS is the Assessment Engineer for the American Canyon LLAD. In that role, they have prepared the Fiscal (FY) 26/27 Annual Engineer's Report.

The annual filing of an Engineer’s Report is required by the Landscaping & Ligh.ng Act of 1972.

Proposed adjustments to the annual assessments are described below. The complete FY 26/27 Engineer’s Report is shown in A@achment 1, Exhibit A. In addi.on to the report, City staff mailed no.ces to all residents in Zones 1 and 2 regarding two informa.onal in-person park pop-ups held in April 2026. The Zone 1 pop-up had approximately 6 a@endees to hear an update from staff and there were no residents that attended for Zone 2.

On May 19, 2025, City Council took ac.on on the following items: 1) preliminarily approved the FY 26/27 Annual Engineer's Report, 2) declared the inten.on to levy and collect assessments, and 3) set the .me and date of the Public Hearing for considera.on of the American Canyon Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District assessments for FY 26/27.

The Engineer's report has been updated to include itemized expenditures for the proposed fiscal year as well as provide prior and current year expenditures. City staff mailed updates to all residents in Zone 1 and 2 on May 21, 2026 aler.ng them to the proposed assessment increase which were not 124
yet known during the pop-up meetings held in April.

The American Canyon LLAD is divided into three (3) zones:

Zone 1: In January 2001, the City Council approved the forma.on of the LLAD. At the .me, the purpose of the LLAD was to operate and maintain facili.es constructed within the La Vigne subdivision. This area of the LLAD is known as Zone 1. The annual work associated with maintaining the facili.es within Zone 1 includes opera.on and maintenance of landscaping in public areas, pedestrian paths, the streetscape of Via Bellagio, and the park areas. Also included are the operation and maintenance of the streetlights within the neighborhood.

Zone 2: Zone 2 encompasses the Vintage Ranch subdivision and includes operation and maintenance of parks, environmentally sensi.ve areas, bike trails, streetscape, water basins, fencing, walls, street lighting, and a portion of traffic signals within the subdivision.

Zone 3: Zone 3 encompasses the Napa Junc.on mixed-use development consis.ng of phases I, II & III which includes the opera.on and maintenance of landscaping, streetscape, bikeways, water basins, park areas, fencing, street ligh.ng and a por.on of traffic signals serving the development. It also includes mowing the frontage along Highway 29 between Rio Del Mar and Napa Junction Road.

Assessment Methodology:

The report includes a descrip.on of each zone in the LLAD, any proposed changes to the zones, the opposed cost to operate and maintain the improvements, the method of appor.onment (spread) of the assessments, the assessment roll for all parcels, and the assessment diagrams (maps). As mentioned above, there will be no annexations to the LLAD this fiscal year.

Assessment Calculation:

The ac.vi.es described in the report are paid for by assessments on parcels that derive special benefit from the ameni.es located within the LLAD. The assessments are updated annually in order account for changes in maintenance budgets and changes in development pa@erns. Staff has verified the proposed FY 26/27 assessments do not exceed the maximum assessment allowed. The table below illustrates all of the proposed FY 26/27 assessments:

Zone
Actual 24/25
Assessment
Actual 25/26
Assessment
Proposed 26/27
Assessment
Maximum 26/27
Assessment
1 $447.44 $459.78 $540 $742.81
2 $338.52 $358.82 $450 $1,138.62
3 $1,079.92/acre
($219.18/unit)
$1,109/acre
($225.22/unit)
$1,109/acre
($225.22/unit)
$2,511.88/acre
($416.40/unit)
Zone 1
The total proposed Zone 1 budget (Total Expenses) for FY 26/27 is $470,347. The proposed funding 125
will be $251,640 from FY 26/27 assessments, and $218,707 from available reserves. This budget is based on current landscaping contracts, expected increases in landscaping contracts based on preliminary bids, historical cost review, and professional es.mates of labor efforts required to maintain the facilities.

The proposed Zone 1 annual assessment rate to levy and collect is proposed to be $540 per ESD.

This represents an increase of 17.45% but s.ll below the allowable maximum. The new maximum annual assessment for Zone 1 is $742.81 per ESD which includes the 2.17% CPI increase.

Zone 2
The total proposes Zone 2 budget (Total Expenses) for FY 26/27 is $724,877.20. This budget is based on current landscaping contracts and expected increases based on preliminary bids, historical cost review, and professional es.mates of labor efforts required to maintain the facili.es. The proposed funding will be $387,180 from FY 26/27 assessments, and $337,697 from available reserves. This includes a $32,300 contribu.on from the general fund to account for general benefit for the use of Shenandoah and Silver Oak parks. The proposed budget includes the full year maintenance funding for all facilities including the Environmentally Sensitive areas.

The proposed Zone 2 annual assessment rate to levy and collect is proposed to be $450. This represents an increase of 25.41% but s.ll below the allowable maximum assessment. The new maximum annual assessment for Zone 2 is $1,138.62 per ESD which includes the 2.17% annual CPI increase.

Zone 3
The total proposed Zone 3 expenses for FY 26/27 is $186,146. This budget is based on current landscaping contracts, expected increases in landscaping contracts, expected increases in landscaping contracts based on preliminary bids, historical cost review, and professional es.mates of labor efforts required to maintain the facili.es. The proposed funding will be $179,640 from FY 26/27 assessments and $6,506 from reserves. No general fund contributions are proposed.

The proposed annual assessment to levy and collect for each parcel within Zone 3 is $1,109 per acre or por.on thereof plus $225.22 per ESD. There is no proposed increase in the assessment rate for FY 26/27. The new maximum assessment is $2,511.88 per acre or por.on thereof and $416.40 per ESD.

The new maximum assessment includes the allowed 2.17% CPI increase.

COUNCIL PRIORITY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS
Community and Sense of Place: "Build on the strength of our local community to develop a clear 'sense of place' and establish our unique identity."

FISCAL IMPACT
There is a General Fund impact by this ac.on in the amount of $32,300 for the contribu.ons to Zone 2 for general public benefit use of Shenandoah and Silver Oak parks. The General Fund contribu.on 126
is included in the proposed FY 26/27 Opera.ng Budget. All other costs associated with the annual proceedings and the opera.on, maintenance, and administra.on of the Assessment District improvements are recovered from the assessments levied and collected on the parcels within each zone.

The total proposed Assessment District budget for FY 26/27 for all three Zones is as follows:

As Preliminarily Filed with the City
Zone 1 Budget $470,347.00
Zone 2 Budget $724,877.20
Zone 3 Budget $186,146.00
Reserve Contributions $(562,909.24)
Balance to Assessment $818,460.96
A more detailed budget for each zone showing the prior year's expenses and projections for the next two fiscal years is shown in the a@ached Engineer's Report for FY 26/27. This is done to provide each zone's property owners with informa.on on trends and poten.al upcoming expenses, including planned capital expenditures.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The use or change of property assessments as a funding mechanism for the opera.ons and maintenance of landscaping and ligh.ng systems is not a project as defined in Sec.on 15378(b)(4) of the California Environmental Quality Act guidelines.

COMMUNICATION
Level 2: Targeted Communication
Neighborhood mee.ngs for LLAD Zone 1 and 2 property owners occurred in mid-April. In addi.on to the neighborhood mee.ngs, City staff mailed updates to all residents in Zone 1 and 2 on May 21, 2026, aler.ng them to the proposed assessment increase which were not yet known during the popup meetings held in April.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution: LLAD

1. Exhibit A: LLAD Engineer Report's 2026-27
127
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-______
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FISCAL YEAR 26/27 ANNUAL ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR THE

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT, TO APPROVE THE BUDGETS WITHIN THE ENGINEER’S REPORT, CONFIRMING THE ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS AND THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT

AMOUNTS, AND AUTHORIZING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 26/27
WHEREAS, the City Council ordered the formation of the Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District (LLAD) in 2001 in order to levy and collect assessments pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Streets and Highways Code Section 22500 et. seq.); and WHEREAS, the City Council intends to levy and collect assessments within the LLAD during Fiscal Year 26/27; and
WHEREAS, the Engineer of Work has prepared and filed with the City Clerk the Fiscal Year 26/27 Engineer’s Report for the Assessment District as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 outlining the proposed budgets, the proposed improvements, and/or changes to the Assessment District in order to levy and collect assessments during any following fiscal year; and WHEREAS, all interested persons are referred to the Fiscal Year 26/27 Engineer’s Report for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the proposed operation and maintenance costs, the boundaries of the Assessment District, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots or parcels of land within the Assessment District boundaries; and
WHEREAS, on May 19th, the City Council adopted a Resolution of Intention to levy and collect annual assessments for Fiscal Year 26/27, preliminarily approved the annual Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 26/27, and set the time and date of the public hearing pursuant to Section 22624 of the Streets and Highways Code; and
WHEREAS, for Fiscal Year 26/27, the proposed annual assessment is $540 per Equivalent Single-Family Dwelling Unit (ESD) for all properties within Zone 1; and WHEREAS, for Fiscal Year 26/27, the proposed annual assessment is $450 per ESD for all properties within Zone 2; and
WHEREAS, for Fiscal Year 26/27, the proposed annual assessment is $225.22 per ESD and $1,109.00 per acre of commercial property for all properties within Zone 3; and WHEREAS, this Resolution is adopted pursuant to Section 22620 of the California Streets and Highways Code; and
WHEREAS, on June 3, 2026, the City Council held the public protest hearing and gave all interested persons the opportunity to protest the Fiscal Year 26/27 Engineer’s Report, either in writing or orally, and the City Council has heard and considered all matters and things pertaining to the levy and collection of the proposed assessments.
128
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that in accordance with the requirements of Section 22631 of the California Streets and Highways Code, the City Council hereby:

1. Approves the Fiscal Year 26/27 Annual Engineer’s Report, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein, for the Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District as prepared and filed.

2. Approves the budgets for each of the three zones within the Engineer’s Report.

3. Confirms the assessment diagram and assessment as set forth in the Annual Engineer’s Report or as modified as allowed by the City Council.

4. Authorizes the levy and collection of annual assessments for Fiscal Year 26/27 as set forth in said report for Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District Zone 1 - LaVigne Subdivision, Zone 2 - Vintage Ranch Subdivision, and Zone 3 – Napa Junction Mixed Use Development.

PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council of the City of American Canyon held on the 2nd day of June, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
________________________________
Pierre Washington, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________ ______________________________ Taresa Geilfuss, CMC, City Clerk Matthew T. Summers, City Attorney Attachments:

Exhibit A – City of American Canyon Fiscal Year 26/27 Annual Engineer’s Report 129
Prepared by:

Corporate Headquarters
32605 Temecula Parkway, Suite 316
Temecula, CA 92592
Toll free: 800.676.7516

CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON
Fiscal Year 2026/27 Consolidated Engineer’s Report For:

Landscape and Lighting Assessment District
May 2026
130

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. ENGINEER’S LETTER ........................................................................................................ 1

2. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 2

2.1 Background .............................................................................................................. 2

2.2 Engineer’s Report Contents .................................................................................... 2

3. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ........................................................................................... 3

3.1 Description of Boundaries of the Districts .............................................................. 3

3.2 Description of Improvements and Services ............................................................ 3

4. BENEFITS FROM IMPROVEMENTS ................................................................................... 6

4.1 Special Benefits Identified ....................................................................................... 6

4.2 General Benefits Identified ..................................................................................... 7

5. ESTIMATE OF COSTS ....................................................................................................... 8

5.1 Fiscal Year 2026/27 Cost Estimates ......................................................................... 8

5.2 Maintenance Cost Estimates ................................................................................. 10

6. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT ............................................................................................ 13

6.1 Calculation of Maximum Assessment Rate ........................................................... 16

7. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS .............................................................................................. 17

8. ASSESSMENT ROLL ........................................................................................................ 21 131
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District – Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 1

1. ENGINEER’S LETTER
The City Council of the City of American Canyon (the “City”), State of California, directed NBS to prepare and file a report, in accordance with Chapter 1, Article 4 of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the “Act”), presenting the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the City’s Landscape and Lighting Assessment District (the “Assessment District”) for Fiscal Year 2026/27. The report includes a diagram for the Assessment District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, and the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the Assessment District in proportion to the special benefit received.

The assessment for each parcel is in compliance with the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act and Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution. The proposed assessments are not proposed to increase by more than the approved maximum allowable increases.

The following table shows: (i) the total amount to be collected against all parcels in the Assessment District in FY 2026/27 (“FY 2026/27 Annual Assessment Amount”) and (ii) within the boundaries of the Assessment District, parcels are assigned various zones (“Zones”) each of which is associated with a set of improvements and/or type of improvements that provide special benefits to properties within that Zone.

Zones
ESD
Units(2) Acres
FY 2026/27
Maximum
Rate
FY 2026/27
Proposed
Rate
FY 2026/27
Annual
Assessment
Amount
Zone 1 – La Vigne 466.00 $742.81 $540.00 $251,640.00
Zone 2 – Vintage Ranch 860.40 $1,138.62 $450.00 $387,180.00 Zone 3 – Napa Junction (1) 570.92 46.04 $2,928.28 $1,334.22 $179,640.92 (1) Zone 3 – Napa Junction is a mixed-use project. The maximum assessment rate is a combined rate of $416.40 per ESD units and $2,511.88 per acres. The proposed rate is a combined rate of $225.22 per ESD units and $1,109.00 per acre. (2) Equivalent Single-Family Dwelling (“ESD”) unit are assigned to each parcel in the zones based on development status and land use classification. 132
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District – Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 2

2. INTRODUCTION

2.1 Background
The District was established in January 2001 to provide a dedicated funding source for the operation and maintenance of landscaping and lighting improvements that benefit parcels within the La Vigne Subdivision (Zone 1). In accordance with Proposition 218 and the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, the Engineer’s Report prepared at the time of formation established the assessment methodology, maximum assessment amounts, and an annual escalation factor to account for inflation. The approved escalation allows assessments to increase annually based on the All Urban Consumers (San Francisco Area) Consumer Price Index (CPI) published by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. These CPI adjustments may be applied without additional property owner notice or balloting; however, any increase above the approved inflation factor would require an assessment ballot process under Proposition 218.

Since the District’s formation, additional areas have been annexed as development has occurred. The Vintage Ranch Subdivision (Zone 2) and the Napa Junction Mixed Use Development (Zone 3) were added to the District, and in July 2020 the Villages at Vintage Ranch, a 159-unit apartment complex, was annexed into Zone 2. Each annexation included approval of the same CPI-based annual escalation provision.

2.2 Engineer’s Report Contents
The Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 requires the preparation and adoption of an annual Engineer’s Report by the City Council in order to levy and collect assessments for the upcoming fiscal year. The City Council has appointed NBS as the Engineer of Work to prepare this Annual Engineer’s Report.

The first step in this process is for the City Council to adopt a resolution that generally describes any proposed new improvements or any substantial changes in existing improvements and orders the engineer to prepare and to file the Engineer’s Report.

This report identifies the improvements to be maintained, the proposed maintenance budgets, and the assessments necessary to fund those costs. It also documents any land use changes or annexations within the District. For Fiscal Year 2026/27, the report calculates the maximum allowable assessment for each zone using the annual CPI escalation factor (2.17% for 2026) and confirms that the proposed assessments for Zones 1, 2, and 3 remain below the maximum permitted levels. 133
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District – Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 3

3. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
Pursuant to sections 22567(a) and 22568 of the 1972 Act, this report describes the existing and any proposed improvements for the Districts. The sections below provide general descriptions of the improvements maintained by the Districts. The purpose of the Districts is to provide for the continued maintenance, operation, and servicing of various public improvements specially benefiting property within the Districts.

3.1 Description of Boundaries of the Districts
Exhibits from the Engineer’s Report at the formation of the District define the boundaries and maintenance areas of each Zone within the District. These exhibits are on file and available for review at the Office of the City Engineer and, in conjunction with the County of Napa (the “County”) Assessor's maps of the areas annexed, comprise the assessment diagrams for the respective annexations. The Assessor's maps are on file in the office of the County Assessor and are, by reference, made a part of this Report.

3.2 Description of Improvements and Services
As authorized by the 1972 Act, the improvements provided by the District and associated with each Zone incorporate various landscaping or lighting improvements that are maintained and serviced for the benefit of real property within the District. The work to be performed within each respective Zone may include but is not limited to (as applicable), the personnel, materials, equipment, electricity, water, professional contract services, construction and maintenance, repair and rehabilitation of the improvements and incidental expenses required to operate the District and provide the improvements and services for each Zone. The improvements provided within the District and for which parcels receive special benefits are generally described in the following paragraphs.

Zone 1 – La Vigne
This Zone provides for the funding of the following improvements, illustrated on the Zone 1 Assessment Diagram found in Section 8:

The maintenance and operation including repair, replacement, and servicing of street light standards, luminaries, wiring, and appurtenances necessary to provide street lighting within Zone 1.

The installation, maintenance and operation to include repair, replacement and servicing of street trees, shrubs, planting and irrigation systems together with earth berms, slopes, curbs, root deflectors, decorative paving, masonry walls and concrete or wood appurtenances, all as delineated on the improvements plans for APN 059-100-006 prepared by Carlson, Barbee & Gibson, Inc. dated June 1, 1999 or as specified in the City of American Canyon Public Works Department, Engineering Division Standard Details and Specifications.

Specifically, this work includes the following:
 Along the entire north side of Parcel A: landscaping and the public walkway adjacent to the creek running through La Vigne subdivision.
 Parcel B: landscape right-of-way area along east side of Flosden Road including the median area directly adjacent to parcel B; landscape and park area north of Parcel A and south of the north Via 134
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District – Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 4 Bellagio entry including the entry monument and the median area in Via Bellagio and special amenities.
 Parcel C: landscape right-of-way area along east side of Flosden Road including the median area directly adjacent to Parcel C; landscaping and detention basin landscaping including entry monument and special amenities and the median area within Via Bellagio.  Parcel D: landscape right-of-way area along east side of Flosden Road, including the median area directly adjacent to Parcel D; landscaping and sound wall west of Parcel J including entry monument and special amenities.
 Parcel E: landscape right-of-way area along east side of Flosden Road including the median area directly adjacent to Parcel E and right-of-way area along south side of American Canyon Road to Via Firenze; median landscape areas within Via Firenze at the intersection of American Canyon Road, landscaping and sound wall north and west of La Vigne Unit 1 including entry monuments and special amenities.
 Parcel F: landscape right-of-way area along south side of American Canyon Road to the wetlands restoration area, asphalt and DG trail, sound wall and landscape area north of Parcel F, entry monuments, and special amenities.
 Parcel G: Asphalt trail extending from Parcel F to southern subdivision boundary.  Parcel H: Special amenities and landscape within park site, “Via Bellagio Park.”  Parcel K: Special amenities and landscape within park site, “Pelleria Park.”  Via Bellagio including the entire length of the landscape right-of-way area from back of curb to face of sidewalk including ancillary medians that intersect Via Bellagio from adjoining parcels and neighborhoods. Entry monuments are not included as they are noted in other parcel descriptions.

The assessments collected in the Zone may also fund any and all incidental expenses in connection there to, all as more particularly authorized pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act.

Zone 2 – Vintage Ranch
This zone provides funding for the maintenance of landscaping, public walkways, creeks and their related improvements, creek trails, landscaping related to water quality basins and ponds, streetscapes, Class 1 bikeways, walls and fences, maintenance and electricity of street lighting, a portion of intersection traffic signals, and parks within Vintage Ranch. The Assessment Diagram in Section 8 illustrates the location of these improvements including:
 Silver Oak Park, “LOT A”
 Shenandoah Park, “LOT H”
 PG&E Linear Park, “LOT F”
 Environmentally sensitive areas located on Lots A, C, D, G & in setback areas and ponds 1  The Creek Trail System along the south side of the tract, north of parcel C  Streetscapes within Vintage Ranch, including landscaped areas at the end of Farentino and the end of the Newhall right-of-way (at the dead end)
135
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District – Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 5  The Class 1 Bikeway on Newell Drive
 Fence and Wall Maintenance
 Water Quality Basins 1, 2, 3 & 4
 Street Lighting
 25% of the traffic signals at Flosden and American Canyon Road; Silver Oak and American Canyon Road, Newell and Silver Oak, and Donaldson and Highway 29 The assessments collected may also fund any and all incidental expenses in connection therewith, all as more particularly authorized pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972.

Zone 3 – Napa Junction Mixed Use Project
This Zone maintains landscaping, streetscape, bikeways, landscaping related to water basins, park areas, fencing, street lighting and traffic signals within the Napa Junction Mixed Use Project. The Assessment Diagram in Section 8 illustrates the location of these improvements specifically:
 Streetscapes
 Class 1 Bikeways
 Highway 29 Ditch (Water Quality Basin 1)
 Small Park (Water Quality Basin 3)
 Street Lighting
 25% of the traffic signal at Eucalyptus and Highway 29  Caltrans right-of-way maintenance along the westerly border of the zone adjacent to the Napa Junction Phase I & II commercial development
 Improvements along the north and south sides of Napa Junction Road as part of the Napa Junction III development
 Multi-Use path/utility access road along the western property line of the Napa Junction III development
 Parcel 4 – Open space and wetlands parcel
The assessments collected may also fund any and all incidental expenses in connection therewith, all as more particularly authorized pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. 136
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District – Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 6

4. BENEFITS FROM IMPROVEMENTS

4.1 Special Benefits Identified
The Assessment District provides for the maintenance and repair of public parks and landscaping, landscaping related to water quality basins, environmentally sensitive areas, trails, bikeways, streetlights, and traffic signals. As determined at the time of formation, when these facilities are well maintained and in good working order, they provide benefits that are unique and special to the property within the district including:

Satisfaction of project design and mitigation requirements included within the CEQA documents for the development included in each zone. Satisfying these requirements uniquely benefits the property in the zone because it allows the various land uses being developed.

Satisfaction of Conditions of Approval for the development included in each zone. Satisfying these requirements uniquely benefits the property in the zone because it allows the various land uses being developed.

Provision of public safety benefits resulting from well-lit streets. Street lighting uniquely benefits the property within the zones that are adjacent to the lighting provided.

Provision of public safety benefits resulting from functioning traffic signals. Traffic signals benefit property within the zone by providing for safe ingress and egress from the property. Traffic signals also provide general benefits to all motorists that are able to travel safely on the roadway system. Twenty-five percent of the traffic signal maintenance costs are allocated to the benefiting zones reflecting the approximate amount of trips associated with development in the zones.

Provision of public safety benefits resulting from the maintenance of water quality detention basins. The water quality detention basins are part of the storm water management system which allows for adequate drainage and prevents flooding and destruction of landscape amenities within the zones. Adequate drainage and protection from flooding is a unique and special benefit to the properties within the zones.

Provision of public recreation benefits resulting from the parks and open spaces. The parks and open spaces within each zone are designed as local features that are integrated within the development and easily accessible to neighboring properties. These features are part of the overall park system, which also includes community facilities, which provide more regionally appropriate facilities (ball fields etc.). The local parks and open spaces uniquely benefit the property within each zone because they have been designed to be accessible and useful for the developed property in each zone.

Provision of aesthetic benefits resulting from parks, open space, and other landscaping features. The parks, open space and landscaping features are internal or directly adjacent to the properties in the zone, hence the aesthetic benefits provided from well-maintained landscaping features are experienced by the properties in the zone.

Provision of public safety benefits resulting from the maintenance of parks and open spaces. Unmaintained parks and open spaces can attract litter, vectors and other undesirable features that create health and safety problems for adjoining properties. Adequate maintenance uniquely benefits the property in each zone because these potentially adverse effects do not occur. 137
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District – Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 7

4.2 General Benefits Identified
Although the improvements may be visible to passersby or to the public at large, the improvements were installed as a requirement for the development of the zones and are designed for the benefit of properties within the zones. As mentioned above, the City contributes funds from the general fund to account for park usage by residents living outside the zones. This contribution was determined by identifying and separating the special and general benefit portions of the costs to maintain the parks. The City also makes contributions to landscaping improvements, upgrades, and replacements, acknowledging that there is some general benefit from the landscaping conferred to all residents of the City. 138
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District – Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 8

5. ESTIMATE OF COSTS
The estimated costs associated with the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized on the following pages.

5.1 Fiscal Year 2026/27 Cost Estimates
The following table shows estimated costs associated with each Zone for work to occur in FY 2026/27.

District Fiscal Year
2026/27
Zone 1 $470,347.00
Zone 2 $724,877.20
Zone 3 $186,146.00
Reserve Contributions ($562,909.24)
Balance to Assessment $818,460.96

5.1.1 COST CATEGORIES AND DESCRIPTIONS
The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget:

Maintenance Cost
General Repairs and Maintenance (Code-42310): This item includes the costs of materials, supplies and contract services for the repair and/or maintenance of district facilities and improvements including irrigation system repairs, maintenance of landscaping related to water quality basins and appurtenant facilities, repairs to play structures, concrete or asphalt pathways, decorative entry walls and other improvements as listed in this report within the District. This item also includes costs of incidental miscellaneous materials and supplies used by City staff for the maintenance and repair of Assessment District improvements.

Electric (Code-43210): This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers, and streetlights.

Water (Code-43230): This item includes the costs to furnish irrigation water for the landscaping within the District.

Capital Repair/Maintenance Costs
Funds will be transferred annually from the restricted reserve fund balance within each zone as needed to fund the completion of the projects listed in the current year’s budget for each of the zones. Any funds not expended will remain in the restricted reserve until needed for the completion of future capital projects or major maintenance activities. This will include the replacement/rehabilitation of the facilities shown in the capital reserve plan which is being developed for each zone.

District Expenses
139
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District – Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 9 Engineering Contract Services (Code-42130): This item includes the costs for the preparation of the Annual Engineer’s Report and Assessment Roll as required by law for the placement of the assessments on the property tax roll.

Inspection/Contract Documents/LLAD Administration (Code-48115): This item includes the costs of all departments and staff and consultants of the City for providing the coordination of District services, contract management, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, and procedural matters associated with the District.

Napa County Auditor Charges (Code-42290): This item includes the cost charged by the County for the placement and collection of the assessments on the County Property Tax roll.

Reserve Funds
Un-Restricted/Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs.

Repair/Replacement – Restricted/Capital Reserve: This item includes funds for the repair/replacement of improvements or the installation of new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include but is not limited to the repair/replacement of improvements at the end of their useful life, upgrading or enhancement of improvements within the District, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms, and other similar events where the costs cannot be covered by the annual assessment levy.

General Fund Contribution for Parks: This item accounts for the general benefit portion of the maintenance costs for parks and the special benefit to parcels outside the district boundary.

Neighborhood Park Service Area: The City of American Canyon’s Parks Master Plan establishes a standard service radius of one-half mile for neighborhood parks. This means any parcels located within a half-mile radius of a neighborhood park could potentially receive benefit from that park because all residents can access and use the park amenities.

The parks were installed as a condition of development and as a part of the specific developments surrounding the parks. Those parks confer a special benefit to the parcels within the Neighborhood Park Service Area, of which those developments are located and can be assessed. There are also parcels outside the District boundary that receive special benefit from the park improvements. The parcels within the District may only be assessed for their share of special benefit from the park improvements. The share of special benefit received by parcels outside the District must be funded by sources other than District assessments, they cannot be assessed to the parcels within the District.

The General Fund Contribution for Parks, shown on the District budget pages, accounts for the portion of special benefit conferred to parcels outside the District but inside a one-half mile radius of the parks, as well as the general benefit portion. A portion of this contribution is also from rental revenue received from individuals renting the park for personal activities.
140
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District – Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 10

5.2 Maintenance Cost Estimates
The Maintenance Costs for each Zone included in table 5.1 are described by expense type in the following tables.

FY 2025-26
Proposed Budget
FY 2026-27

MAINTENANCE COSTS
General Repairs & Maintenance (Code 261-85-430-4231)
Annual Maintenance Cost 60,000$ 35,500$
Brightview-Replacement Plantings 7,500$ 40,000$
DG Pathway Repairs 5,000$ 5,000$
Irrigation Repair 20,000$ 50,000$
Streetlight/Lamp Maintenance 5,000$ 57,000$
Tree Maintenance/Trimming Crown Reduction 160,000$ 50,000$ Wood & Wire Fencing Repairs 20,000$ 19,300$
Utilities - Electric (Code 261-85-430-43210) 14,000$ 12,378$ Utilities - Water (Code 261-85-430-43230) 43,200$ 55,230$ Contractual Services - Grazing (Code 261-85-430-42190) -$ 32,000$ SUBTOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 334,700$ 356,408$

RESERVE CONTRIBUTIONS
Capital Reserve Contribution (Code XFER TO RESERVE) 10,000$ -$ SUBTOTAL RESERVE COSTS 10,000$ -$

DISTRICT EXPENSES
Professional Services (Code 261-85-430-42160)
Annual Administration (City) -$ 6,200$
Annual Administration (Consultant) 15,000$ 5,000$
County Collection Fees (Code 261-85-430-42290) 233$ 233$ SUBTOTAL DISTRICT EXPENSES 15,233$ 11,433$
TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS 359,933$ 367,841$

FUND BALANCE INFORMATION
Unrestricted Operating Reserves 439,502$ 327,614$
Restricted/ Capital Reserve 85,412$ 191,994$
RESERVE TOTAL 524,914$ 519,608$

CONTRIBUTION FROM RESERVES
Unrestricted Operating Reserves (145,676)$ (116,201)$
TOTAL CONTRIBUTION FROM RESERVES (145,676)$ (116,201)$
Est. Unrestricted Operating Reserves – 07/01 293,826$ 211,413$ Est. Restricted/ Capital Reserve Balance end of year 06/30 95,412$ 191,994$ EST. RESERVE TOTAL 389,238$ 403,407$
Total Revenue at Maximum Rate 338,808$ 346,149$
Variance above/(below) Maximum Rate (124,551)$ (94,509)$ PROPOSED TOTAL ASSESSMENT 214,257$ 251,640$
Total ESD Units to be Assessed 466 466
Actual Proposed Assessment Rate 459.78$ 540.00$
Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate 727.06$ 742.81$
Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District
Zone 1- La Vigne Subdivision
FY 2026-27 Budget
141
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District – Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 11

FY 2025-26
Proposed Budget FY
2026-27

MAINTENANCE COSTS
General Repairs & Maintenance (Code 262-85-430-42310)
Annual Maintenance Cost 165,000$ 147,500$
Traffic Signal Maintenance 1,500$ 10,000 $
Service Portable Restrooms 6,300$ 5,000$
Irrigation Repair 20,000$ 60,000$
Streetlight/Lamp Maintenance 15,000$ 50,000$
Garbage Can Replacements 2,800$ 10,000$
Wood & Wire Fencing Repairs 20,000$ 25,000 $
Sidewalk Repair & Grinding 5,000$ 10,000 $
Tree Trimming & Replacement -$ 30,000$
Grazing Open Space areas in Zone (Code 262-85-430-42190) 22,700$ 31,250$ Facilities Assessment (Code 262-85-430-42190) -$ 26,000$ Utilities - Electric (Code 262-85-430-43210) 40,500$ 43,638$ Utilities - Water (Code 262-85-430-43230) 92,000$ 105,180$ SUBTOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 390,800$ 553,568$

RESERVE CONTRIBUTIONS
General Fund Contribution for Parks (General Benefit) (32,300)$ (33,300)$ Park Rental Revenue 6,000$ 6,000$
Capital Reserve Contribution (Code XFER TO RESERVE) 25,000$ -$ SUBTOTAL RESERVE COSTS (1,300)$ (27,300)$

CAPITAL PROJECT/REPAIRS COST
Silver Oak Restroom (Code 262-85-450-48310) 418,055$ 184,891$ SUBTOTAL CAPITAL PROJECT/ REPAIR COSTS 418,055$ 184,891$

DISTRICT EXPENSES
Professional Services (Code 262-85-430-42160)
Annual Administration (City) -$ 5,000$
Annual Administration (Engineering Services) 20,000$ 13,000$ County Collection Fees (Code 262-85-430-42290) 500$ 500$ SUBTOTAL DISTRICT EXPENSES 20,500$ 18,500$
TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS 828,055$ 729,659$

FUND BALANCE INFORMATION
Unrestricted Operating Reserves 451,412$ 390,271$
Restricted/ Capital Reserve 495,673$ 315,281$
RESERVE TOTAL 947,085$ 705,552$

CONTRIBUTION FROM RESERVES
Unrestricted Operating Reserves (101,271)$ (157,588)$
Restricted/Capital Reserves (418,055)$ (184,891)$
TOTAL CONTRIBUTION FROM RESERVES (519,326)$ (342,479)$
Est. Unrestricted Operating Reserves – 07/01 350,141 $ 47,792$ Est. Restricted/ Capital Reserve Balance end of year 06/30 76,318$ 130,390$ EST. RESERVE TOTAL 426,459$ 178,182$
Total Revenue at Maximum Rate 958,894$ 985,330$
Variance above/(below) Maximum Rate (650,165)$ (598,150)$ PROPOSED TOTAL ASSESSMENT 308,729$ 387,180$
Total ESD Units to be Assessed 860.40 860.40
Actual Proposed Assessment Rate 358.82$ 450.00$
Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate 1,114.47$ 1,145.20$
Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District
Zone 2 - Vintage Ranch Subdivision
FY 2026-27 Budget
142
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District – Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 12 FY 2025-26
Proposed Budget
FY 2026-27

MAINTENANCE COSTS
General Repairs & Maintenance (Code263-85-430-42310)
Annual Maintenance Cost 47,000$ 25,000$
Tree Replacement 10,000$ 10,000$
Service Portable Restrooms -$ -$
Irrigation Repair 10,000$ 20,000$
Streetlight/Lamp Maintenance 7,000$ 30,000$
CalTrans Traffic Signal Maintenance -$ -$
On-Site Inspection/Assessment of Facilities -$ -$
NJ Split Rail Fence Repair 30,000$ 7,000$
Sidewalk Repair & Grinding 5,000$ 10,000 $
Utilities - Electric (Code 263-85-430-43210) 1,600$ 262$ Utilities - Water (Code 263-85-430-43230) 11,300$ 11,164$ SUBTOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 121,900$ 113,426$

RESERVE CONTRIBUTIONS
Capital Reserve Contribution (Code XFER TO RESERVE) -$ -$ SUBTOTAL RESERVE COSTS -$ -$

CAPITAL PROJECT/REPAIRS COST
Main Street Park Improvments 150,000$ 150,000$
SUBTOTAL CAPITAL PROJECT/REPAIR COSTS 150,000$ 150,000$

DISTRICT EXPENSES
Professional Services (Code 263-85-430-42190)
Annual Administration (Engineering Services) 9,000$ 11,000$ County Collection Fees 100$ 5,000$
Annual Administration (City Code 263-85-430-42160) 4,500$ 4,500$ SUBTOTAL DISTRICT EXPENSES 13,600$ 20,500$
TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS 285,500$ 283,926$

FUND BALANCE INFORMATION
Unrestricted Operating Reserves 199,298$ 1,659,870$
Restricted/ Capital Reserve 1,419,282$ 268,080$
RESERVE TOTAL 1,618,580$ 1,927,950$

COLLECTION/(CONTRIBUTION) FROM RESERVES
Unrestricted Operating Reserves 44,140$ 45,715$
Restricted/Capital Reserves (150,000)$ (150,000)$
TOTAL CONTRIBUTION FROM RESERVES (105,860)$ (104,285)$
Est. Unrestricted Operating Reserves – 07/01 243,438 $ 1,705,585$ Est. Restricted/ Capital Reserve Balance end of year 06/30 1,269,282$ 118,080$ EST. RESERVE TOTAL 1,512,720$ 1,823,665$
Total Revenue at Maximum Rate (ESD) 232,697$ 239,113$
Variance above/(below) Maximum Rate (ESD) (109,105)$ (59,472)$ Total Revenue at Maximum Rate (Acre) 113,194$ 116,315$
Variance above/(below) Maximum Rate (Acre) (57,146)$ 63,326$ PROPOSED TOTAL ASSESSMENT 179,640$ 179,640.96 $
Total ESD Units to be Assessed 570.92 570.92
Total Acres to be Assessed 46.04 46.04
Actual Proposed Assessment Rate per ESD 225.22$ 225.22$ Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate per ESD 407.58$ 418.82$ Actual Proposed Assessment Rate per Acre 1,109.00$ 1,109.00$ Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate per Acre 2,458.60$ 2,526.39$ Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District
Zone 3 - Napa Junction Mixed Use Project
FY 2026-27 Budget
143
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District – Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 13

6. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT
Each of the parcels within the Districts are deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements.

ZONES 1 AND 2 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT
The method of apportionment (spread) equates all parcels in Zones 1 and 2 to an Equivalent Single-Family Dwelling (ESD) unit, or portion thereof. The following ESD units were established for the American Canyon Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District, at its formation, and reflect the relative benefit accruing to parcels of land, in various stages of development, from the landscape and lighting facilities:

1. Vacant parcel in undeveloped area; 1/10 unit per parcel

2. Vacant parcel in developed area; 1/2 unit per parcel

3. Single dwelling parcel; 1 per unit

4. Multi-Family dwelling; 0.60 per unit
Vacant parcels in undeveloped areas experience the benefits provided from satisfying approval conditions but not the full benefits experienced when the facilities maintained by the zone are operational hence, they are assigned 1/10 of an ESD unit. Vacant parcels in developed areas experience the benefits provided from satisfying approval conditions and the public safety benefits associated with sound drainage systems.

These parcels also experience some fraction of the benefits associated with safe lighting and ingress and egress but not at the same level as a fully developed parcel, hence they are assigned 1/2 of an ESD unit.

Fully developed parcels experience all benefits provided by the zone. Because the land uses on both Zone 1 and 2 are relatively uniform single-family dwelling units, benefits are experienced equally. This relative equality of benefits results in an assessment methodology that spreads costs equally at full build out.

ESD units for each zone are determined annually based on the development pattern. Each zone's operation and maintenance expenses for the upcoming fiscal year is then divided by the total number of ESD units in order to calculate the annual cost per ESD unit (assessment rate) for the upcoming fiscal year. The annual assessment for each parcel is calculated by multiplying the annual cost per ESD unit (assessment rate) by the total number ESD units on the parcel in the upcoming fiscal year.

The method of apportionment for Zones 1 and 2 can be expressed mathematically as:

Cost per ESD Unit (Rate) = Fiscal Year Budget for Zone / Total Number of ESD Units in Zone Assessment per Parcel = Cost per ESD Unit (Rate) x No. of ESD Units on Parcel Although Section 22663 of the Streets and Highways Code typically requires that public property not be assessed, Article XIII, Section 4(a) of Proposition 218 requires that public property shall not be exempt from assessment if the property benefits from the facilities being maintained. 144
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District – Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 14 Zones 1 and 2 include publicly owned property which is utilized for parks, creeks, open spaces, public rightof-way, and easements. These properties serve to provide landscape, open space, drainage, and recreational benefits to the adjoining residential property. Because these properties provide special benefits rather than receive special benefits they do not receive an annual assessment.

Likewise, school sites, which provide for open space and recreational opportunities, enhance the special benefits received by residential property. In addition, school locations are required by the approval documents for the development and therefore help provide the special benefits associated with compliance with project CEQA documents and conditions of approval. Therefore, because these properties provide benefits rather than receive benefits, they are also not assessed.

Civic properties including public safety facilities and utility facilities which were constructed as a condition of approval for the residential development serve to support the special benefits received by residential properties. Because these properties support the provision of special benefits rather than receiving special benefits, they are also not assessed.

ZONE 3 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT
Unlike Zones 1 and 2, Zone 3 contains a mix of residential, commercial, industrial, and retail land uses. In order to apportion costs proportional to benefit, the method of apportionment (spread) for Zone 3 utilizes both an ESD unit component and an acreage component.

The benefits provided by the Class I bike path, three-rail fencing, streetlights, traffic signal, and the detention pond and right of way maintenance along Highway 29 are apportioned by acreage because the size of the property provides a reasonable measure of the number trips (vehicular and bicycle), length of fencing and runoff detained. Therefore, the cost of operating and maintaining these facilities is apportioned to the benefiting property based on its acreage.

The benefits provided by the streetscape, large and small parks are apportioned by ESD unit, as is done in the other two zones. These items provide benefit to and are accessible to resident families and employees of local businesses to enjoy during lunch breaks or after work hours. Non-residential land uses are converted to residential land uses, using square-footage in order to maintain equality between the average size residential unit in the zone and the non-residential units. 145
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District – Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 15 The following benefit units were established for the American Canyon Landscaping and Lighting Assessment Zone 3 (Napa Junction) at the time it was annexed to the Assessment District and these reflect the relative benefit accruing the various parcels of land within the zone:

Land Use Description Total ESD’s
Single Family Dwelling (SFD) 1/Unit
Condominium 1/Unit
Multiple Family Residential 1/Unit
Mobile Home 1/Unit
Commercial 1/1,500 sf floor space*
Commercial with Dwelling Unit – Includes Hotel 1/1,500 sf floor space + 1/Unit
All Land Use Types Acres
ESD units for Zone 3 are determined annually based on the development pattern. The operational and maintenance expenses for the upcoming fiscal year for the streetscape, large park and small park facilities are then divided by the total number of ESD units in order to calculate the annual cost per ESD unit for the upcoming fiscal year.

Acreage units within Zone 3 are also determined annually based on development. The operational and maintenance expenses for the upcoming fiscal year for Class I bike path, three-rail fencing, streetlights, traffic signal, and the detention pond and right of way maintenance along Highway 29 are then divided by the total acreage units in order to calculate the annual cost per acreage unit for the upcoming fiscal year.

The annual assessment for each parcel is calculated by:

1. Multiplying the number of ESD units on the parcel by the annual cost per ESD unit to arrive at the ESD assessment for the parcel

2. Multiplying the acreage of the parcel by the annual cost per acreage unit to arrive at the acreage assessment; and

3. Adding the ESD assessment to the acreage assessment to arrive at the total assessment for the parcel.

The allocation formula for Zone 3 can be expressed mathematically as:

Cost per ESD Unit = Fiscal Year Budget for ESD Unit Items in Zone / Total ESD Units in Zone Cost per Acre = Fiscal Year Budget for Acreage Items in Zone / Total Acreage in Zone Assessment per Parcel = (Cost per ESD x No. of ESD Units on Parcel) + (Cost per Acre x No. of Acres on Parcel)
Although Section 22663 of the Streets and Highways Code typically requires that public property not be assessed, Article XIII, Section 4(a) of Proposition 218 requires that public property shall not be exempt from assessment if the property benefits from the facilities being maintained. 146
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District – Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 16 Zone 3 includes publicly owned property which is utilized for parks, creeks, open spaces, public rights-ofway, and easements. These properties serve to provide landscape, open space, and recreational benefits to the adjoining property. Because these properties provide special benefits rather than receive special benefits they do not receive an annual assessment.

6.1 Calculation of Maximum Assessment Rate
The table below summarizes the maximum annual assessments allowed in Zones 1, 2 and 3, including the CPI increases, and compares the prior year assessments to the assessments proposed to be levied and collected in Fiscal Year 2026-27. As shown, the proposed assessment within each Zone is less than the Maximum Assessment allowed, thus Proposition 218 balloting is not required in any zone.

District
FY 2025/26
Maximum
Rate
FY 2026/27
Maximum
Rate
CPI %
Increase
FY 2025/26
Applied
Rate
FY 2026/27
Applied
Rate
% Increase
of Applied
Rate
Zone 1 – La Vigne $727.03 $742.81 2.17% $459.78 $540.00 17.45% Zone 2 – Vintage Ranch $1,114.44 $1,138.62 2.17% $358.82 $450.00 25.41% Zone 3 – Napa Junction
ESD (1) $407.56 $416.40 2.17% $225.22 $225.22 0%
Zone 3 – Napa Junction
Acre (1) $2,458.53 $2,511.88 2.17% $1,109.00 $1,109.00 0% (1) The prior consultant’s budgets included category-based breakdowns. Applied rates were calculated by dividing each category budget by the total ESDs and acres within the zone. The ESD budget of $123,593 divided by 570.92 ESDs resulted in an applied rate of $225.22 per ESD. The acreage budget of $56,048 divided by 46.04 acres resulted in an applied rate of $1,109.00 per acre, which was further adjusted for rounding and parcel acreage.
147
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District – Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 17

7. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS
The following pages include the Assessment Diagrams for Zones 1, 2 and 3 within the Assessment District.

Please note the lines and dimensions of each parcel, as well as the distinctive Assessor's Parcel Number, are shown on the Assessor's Maps for the City of American Canyon available at the County of Napa Assessor's Office. The reference to the appropriate Assessor Books at the County of Napa Assessor's Office for the respective subdivisions in each Zone are listed below.

ZONE 1 - LA VIGNE
All the land lying within the La Vigne Unit 1 Subdivision filed in the Recorder's office of the County of Napa in Book 22 of Recorded Maps, Pages 42 through 57.

All the land lying within the La Vigne Unit 2 Subdivision filed in the Recorder’s office of the County of Napa in Book 22 of Recorded Maps, Pages 82 through 97.

ZONE 2 - VINTAGE RANCH
All the land within the Scally Ranch Unit 1 Subdivision filed in the Recorder's office of the County of Napa in Book 24 of Recorded Maps, Pages 1 through 22.

All the land within the Amended Scally Ranch Unit 1 Subdivision filed in the Recorder's office of the County of Napa in Book 24 of Recorded Maps, Pages 36 through 57.

All of the land within the Vintage Ranch Unit 2 Subdivision filed in the Recorder’s office of the County of Napa in Book 25 of Recorded Maps, Pages 35 through 51.

All of the land within the Vintage Ranch Unit 3 Subdivision filed in the Recorder’s office of the County of Napa in Book 25 of Recorded Maps, Pages 52 through 57.

Vineyard Crossing and Vineyard Place parcels were de-annexed from Zone 2 by City Council Resolution No. 2011-37.

The Villages at Vintage Ranch were annexed in the Zone in FY 2020-21 by City Council Resolution No. 2020-

68. ZONE 3 - NAPA JUNCTION MIXED USE PROJECT
All the land within the Napa Junction Phase 1 Subdivision filed in the Recorder's office of the County of Napa in Book 24 of Recorded Maps, Pages 81 through 87.

All the land within the Amended Napa Junction Phase 1 Subdivision filed in the Recorder’s office of the County of Napa in Book 25, Pages 5 through 11.
148
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District – Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 18 149
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District – Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 19 150
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District – Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 20 151
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District – Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 21

8. ASSESSMENT ROLL
The Assessment Roll of assessments is provided on the following pages. The description of each lot or parcel as part of the records of the County of Napa Assessor is, by reference, part of this Report.

The Assessor's parcel identification for each lot or parcel within the District shall be based on the County Assessor's secured roll data for the applicable year in which this Report is prepared and is incorporated herein by reference.

A listing of the Assessor's parcels assessed within the District for Fiscal Year 2026/27, along with the assessment amounts, is on file in the office of the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference. Based on the County Assessor's secured roll data, the current Assessor's parcels, including corrected or new Assessor's parcels, will be submitted or resubmitted to the County Auditor/Controller. The annual assessment amount to be levied and collected for the resubmitted parcel(s) shall be determined per the method of apportionment and assessment rate approved in this Report. Therefore, if a single assessor's parcel has a status change in development, other land use change, or subdivides into multiple Assessor's parcels, the assessment amounts applied to each of the new Assessor's parcels shall be recalculated and applied according to the approved method of apportionment and assessment rate rather than a proportionate share of the original assessment amount.
152
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District Zone 1 - La Vigne Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2026/27
APN Site Address Assessment Total
059-191-002-000 172 VIA BELLAGIO $540.00
059-191-003-000 168 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-191-004-000 164 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-191-005-000 160 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-191-006-000 138 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-191-007-000 134 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-191-008-000 130 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-191-009-000 126 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-191-010-000 122 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-191-011-000 118 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-191-012-000 114 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-191-013-000 110 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-191-014-000 106 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-191-015-000 102 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-191-016-000 98 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-191-017-000 94 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-191-018-000 90 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-191-019-000 86 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-191-020-000 82 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-191-021-000 78 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-191-022-000 74 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-191-023-000 70 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-191-024-000 66 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-191-025-000 62 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-191-026-000 58 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-191-027-000 54 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-191-028-000 50 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-191-029-000 45 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-191-030-000 35 VIA FIRENZE 540.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 1 of 45 05/11/2026 05:11:56PM 153
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District Zone 1 - La Vigne Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2026/27
APN Site Address Assessment Total
059-191-031-000 31 VIA FIRENZE 540.00
059-191-032-000 27 VIA FIRENZE 540.00
059-191-033-000 23 VIA FIRENZE 540.00
059-191-034-000 19 VIA FIRENZE 540.00
059-191-035-000 15 VIA FIRENZE 540.00
059-191-036-000 11 VIA FIRENZE 540.00
059-191-037-000 7 VIA FIRENZE 540.00
059-191-038-000 3 VIA FIRENZE 540.00
059-191-039-000 136 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-191-040-000 140 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-191-041-000 144 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-191-042-000 148 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-191-043-000 152 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-191-044-000 156 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-191-045-000 2 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-191-046-000 6 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-191-047-000 10 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-191-048-000 14 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-191-049-000 18 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-191-050-000 22 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-191-051-000 26 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-191-052-000 30 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-191-053-000 34 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-191-054-000 38 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-191-055-000 42 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-192-001-000 87 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-192-002-000 83 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-192-003-000 79 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-192-004-000 75 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 2 of 45 05/11/2026 05:11:56PM 154
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District Zone 1 - La Vigne Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2026/27
APN Site Address Assessment Total
059-192-005-000 71 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-192-006-000 67 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-192-007-000 63 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-192-008-000 59 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-192-009-000 55 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-192-010-000 51 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-192-011-000 35 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-192-012-000 31 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-192-013-000 27 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-192-014-000 23 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-192-015-000 19 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-192-016-000 15 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-192-017-000 11 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-192-018-000 7 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-192-019-000 3 CASTELLINA CIR 540.00
059-201-001-000 14 VIA FIRENZE 540.00
059-201-002-000 18 VIA FIRENZE 540.00
059-201-003-000 22 VIA FIRENZE 540.00
059-201-004-000 113 VIA PESCARA 540.00
059-201-005-000 109 VIA PESCARA 540.00
059-201-006-000 105 VIA PESCARA 540.00
059-201-007-000 101 VIA PESCARA 540.00
059-201-008-000 97 VIA PESCARA 540.00
059-201-009-000 93 VIA PESCARA 540.00
059-201-010-000 89 VIA PESCARA 540.00
059-201-011-000 85 VIA PESCARA 540.00
059-201-012-000 81 VIA PESCARA 540.00
059-201-013-000 57 VIA PESCARA 540.00
059-201-014-000 53 VIA PESCARA 540.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 3 of 45 05/11/2026 05:11:56PM 155
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District Zone 1 - La Vigne Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2026/27
APN Site Address Assessment Total
059-201-015-000 49 VIA PESCARA 540.00
059-201-016-000 45 VIA PESCARA 540.00
059-201-017-000 27 VIA PESCARA 540.00
059-201-018-000 23 VIA PESCARA 540.00
059-201-019-000 19 VIA PESCARA 540.00
059-201-020-000 15 VIA PESCARA 540.00
059-201-021-000 6 ELBA CT 540.00
059-201-022-000 10 ELBA CT 540.00
059-201-023-000 14 ELBA CT 540.00
059-201-024-000 19 ELBA CT 540.00
059-201-025-000 15 ELBA CT 540.00
059-201-026-000 11 ELBA CT 540.00
059-201-027-000 7 ELBA CT 540.00
059-201-028-000 3 ELBA CT 540.00
059-202-001-000 118 VIA PESCARA 540.00
059-202-002-000 114 VIA PESCARA 540.00
059-202-003-000 110 VIA PESCARA 540.00
059-202-004-000 106 VIA PESCARA 540.00
059-202-005-000 102 VIA PESCARA 540.00
059-202-006-000 98 VIA PESCARA 540.00
059-202-007-000 94 VIA PESCARA 540.00
059-202-008-000 90 VIA PESCARA 540.00
059-202-009-000 86 VIA PESCARA 540.00
059-202-010-000 82 VIA PESCARA 540.00
059-202-011-000 78 VIA PESCARA 540.00
059-202-012-000 74 VIA PESCARA 540.00
059-202-013-000 70 VIA PESCARA 540.00
059-202-014-000 66 VIA PESCARA 540.00
059-202-015-000 62 VIA PESCARA 540.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 4 of 45 05/11/2026 05:11:56PM 156
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District Zone 1 - La Vigne Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2026/27
APN Site Address Assessment Total
059-202-016-000 58 VIA PESCARA 540.00
059-202-017-000 54 VIA PESCARA 540.00
059-202-018-000 50 VIA PESCARA 540.00
059-202-019-000 46 VIA PESCARA 540.00
059-202-020-000 42 VIA PESCARA 540.00
059-202-021-000 38 VIA PESCARA 540.00
059-202-022-000 34 VIA PESCARA 540.00
059-202-024-000 108 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-202-025-000 112 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-202-026-000 116 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-202-027-000 120 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-202-028-000 124 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-202-029-000 128 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-202-030-000 132 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-202-031-000 2 VIA PESCARA 540.00
059-202-032-000 6 VIA PESCARA 540.00
059-202-033-000 10 VIA PESCARA 540.00
059-202-034-000 14 VIA PESCARA 540.00
059-202-035-000 18 VIA PESCARA 540.00
059-202-036-000 22 VIA PESCARA 540.00
059-202-037-000 26 VIA PESCARA 540.00
059-202-038-000 30 VIA PESCARA 540.00
059-211-002-000 50 MONTECARLO WAY 540.00
059-211-003-000 46 MONTECARLO WAY 540.00
059-211-004-000 42 MONTECARLO WAY 540.00
059-211-005-000 38 MONTECARLO WAY 540.00
059-211-006-000 34 MONTECARLO WAY 540.00
059-211-007-000 30 MONTECARLO WAY 540.00
059-211-008-000 26 MONTECARLO WAY 540.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 5 of 45 05/11/2026 05:11:56PM 157
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District Zone 1 - La Vigne Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2026/27
APN Site Address Assessment Total
059-211-009-000 22 MONTECARLO WAY 540.00
059-211-010-000 18 MONTECARLO WAY 540.00
059-211-011-000 14 MONTECARLO WAY 540.00
059-211-012-000 10 MONTECARLO WAY 540.00
059-211-013-000 6 MONTECARLO WAY 540.00
059-211-014-000 2 MONTECARLO WAY 540.00
059-212-001-000 59 MONTECARLO WAY 540.00
059-212-002-000 63 MONTECARLO WAY 540.00
059-212-003-000 67 MONTECARLO WAY 540.00
059-212-004-000 42 PIENZA DR 540.00
059-212-005-000 38 PIENZA DR 540.00
059-212-006-000 34 PIENZA DR 540.00
059-212-007-000 30 PIENZA DR 540.00
059-212-008-000 26 PIENZA DR 540.00
059-212-009-000 22 PIENZA DR 540.00
059-212-010-000 18 PIENZA DR 540.00
059-212-011-000 14 PIENZA DR 540.00
059-212-012-000 10 PIENZA DR 540.00
059-212-013-000 35 MONTECARLO WAY 540.00
059-212-014-000 39 MONTECARLO WAY 540.00
059-212-015-000 43 MONTECARLO WAY 540.00
059-212-016-000 47 MONTECARLO WAY 540.00
059-212-017-000 51 MONTECARLO WAY 540.00
059-212-018-000 55 MONTECARLO WAY 540.00
059-213-001-000 71 MONTECARLO WAY 540.00
059-213-002-000 75 MONTECARLO WAY 540.00
059-213-003-000 79 MONTECARLO WAY 540.00
059-213-004-000 167 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-213-005-000 163 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 6 of 45 05/11/2026 05:11:56PM 158
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District Zone 1 - La Vigne Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2026/27
APN Site Address Assessment Total
059-213-006-000 159 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-213-007-000 155 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-213-008-000 151 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-213-009-000 147 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-213-010-000 143 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-213-011-000 139 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-213-012-000 135 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-213-013-000 131 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-213-014-000 127 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-213-015-000 123 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-213-016-000 119 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-213-017-000 115 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-213-018-000 111 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-213-019-000 107 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-213-020-000 3 PIENZA DR 540.00
059-213-021-000 7 PIENZA DR 540.00
059-213-022-000 11 PIENZA DR 540.00
059-213-023-000 15 PIENZA DR 540.00
059-213-024-000 19 PIENZA DR 540.00
059-213-025-000 23 PIENZA DR 540.00
059-213-026-000 27 PIENZA DR 540.00
059-213-027-000 31 PIENZA DR 540.00
059-213-028-000 35 PIENZA DR 540.00
059-213-029-000 39 PIENZA DR 540.00
059-213-030-000 43 PIENZA DR 540.00
059-213-031-000 47 PIENZA DR 540.00
059-213-032-000 51 PIENZA DR 540.00
059-221-001-000 59 VIA LA MORRA 540.00
059-221-002-000 55 VIA LA MORRA 540.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 7 of 45 05/11/2026 05:11:56PM 159
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District Zone 1 - La Vigne Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2026/27
APN Site Address Assessment Total
059-221-003-000 51 VIA LA MORRA 540.00
059-221-004-000 47 VIA LA MORRA 540.00
059-221-005-000 43 VIA LA MORRA 540.00
059-221-006-000 39 VIA LA MORRA 540.00
059-221-007-000 35 VIA LA MORRA 540.00
059-221-008-000 31 VIA LA MORRA 540.00
059-221-009-000 27 VIA LA MORRA 540.00
059-221-010-000 23 VIA LA MORRA 540.00
059-221-011-000 19 VIA LA MORRA 540.00
059-221-012-000 15 VIA LA MORRA 540.00
059-221-013-000 11 VIA LA MORRA 540.00
059-221-014-000 7 VIA LA MORRA 540.00
059-221-015-000 3 VIA LA MORRA 540.00
059-221-016-000 69 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-221-017-000 61 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-221-018-000 55 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-222-001-000 62 VIA LA MORRA 540.00
059-222-002-000 58 VIA LA MORRA 540.00
059-222-003-000 54 VIA LA MORRA 540.00
059-222-004-000 50 VIA LA MORRA 540.00
059-222-005-000 15 BIELLA CT 540.00
059-222-006-000 11 BIELLA CT 540.00
059-222-007-000 7 BIELLA CT 540.00
059-222-008-000 3 BIELLA CT 540.00
059-222-009-000 2 BIELLA CT 540.00
059-222-010-000 6 BIELLA CT 540.00
059-222-011-000 10 BIELLA CT 540.00
059-222-012-000 18 VIA LA MORRA 540.00
059-222-013-000 14 VIA LA MORRA 540.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 8 of 45 05/11/2026 05:11:56PM 160
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District Zone 1 - La Vigne Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2026/27
APN Site Address Assessment Total
059-222-014-000 10 VIA LA MORRA 540.00
059-222-015-000 6 VIA LA MORRA 540.00
059-222-016-000 51 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-222-017-000 47 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-222-018-000 43 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-222-019-000 39 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-222-020-000 35 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-222-021-000 31 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-222-022-000 27 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-222-023-000 23 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-222-024-000 19 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-222-025-000 15 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-222-026-000 11 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-222-027-000 7 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-222-028-000 3 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-231-001-000 14 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-231-002-000 18 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-231-003-000 22 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-231-004-000 26 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-231-005-000 30 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-231-006-000 34 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-231-007-000 38 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-231-008-000 42 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-231-009-000 46 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-231-010-000 50 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-231-011-000 54 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-231-012-000 27 PELLERIA DR 540.00
059-231-013-000 31 PELLERIA DR 540.00
059-231-014-000 35 PELLERIA DR 540.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 9 of 45 05/11/2026 05:11:56PM 161
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District Zone 1 - La Vigne Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2026/27
APN Site Address Assessment Total
059-231-015-000 39 PELLERIA DR 540.00
059-231-016-000 43 PELLERIA DR 540.00
059-231-017-000 47 PELLERIA DR 540.00
059-231-018-000 51 PELLERIA DR 540.00
059-231-019-000 59 VIA MARCIANA 540.00
059-232-001-000 78 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-232-002-000 74 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-232-003-000 70 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-232-004-000 66 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-232-005-000 62 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-232-006-000 58 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-232-007-000 23 PELLERIA DR 540.00
059-232-008-000 19 PELLERIA DR 540.00
059-232-009-000 15 PELLERIA DR 540.00
059-232-010-000 11 PELLERIA DR 540.00
059-232-011-000 7 PELLERIA DR 540.00
059-232-012-000 3 PELLERIA DR 540.00
059-232-013-000 27 VIA MONTALCINO 540.00
059-232-014-000 23 VIA MONTALCINO 540.00
059-232-015-000 19 VIA MONTALCINO 540.00
059-232-016-000 15 VIA MONTALCINO 540.00
059-232-017-000 11 VIA MONTALCINO 540.00
059-232-018-000 7 VIA MONTALCINO 540.00
059-232-019-000 3 VIA MONTALCINO 540.00
059-232-020-000 4 PALAZZO WAY 540.00
059-232-021-000 8 PALAZZO WAY 540.00
059-232-022-000 12 PALAZZO WAY 540.00
059-232-023-000 16 PALAZZO WAY 540.00
059-232-024-000 20 PALAZZO WAY 540.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 10 of 45 05/11/2026 05:11:56PM 162
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District Zone 1 - La Vigne Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2026/27
APN Site Address Assessment Total
059-232-025-000 24 PALAZZO WAY 540.00
059-232-026-000 28 PALAZZO WAY 540.00
059-232-027-000 32 PALAZZO WAY 540.00
059-232-028-000 36 PALAZZO WAY 540.00
059-232-029-000 40 PALAZZO WAY 540.00
059-232-030-000 44 PALAZZO WAY 540.00
059-232-031-000 48 PALAZZO WAY 540.00
059-233-001-000 50 PELLERIA DR 540.00
059-233-002-000 46 PELLERIA DR 540.00
059-233-003-000 42 PELLERIA DR 540.00
059-233-004-000 38 PELLERIA DR 540.00
059-233-005-000 34 PELLERIA DR 540.00
059-233-006-000 30 PELLERIA DR 540.00
059-233-007-000 26 PELLERIA DR 540.00
059-233-008-000 22 PELLERIA DR 540.00
059-233-009-000 18 PELLERIA DR 540.00
059-233-010-000 14 VIA MONTALCINO 540.00
059-233-011-000 10 VIA MONTALCINO 540.00
059-233-012-000 6 VIA MONTALCINO 540.00
059-233-013-000 2 VIA MONTALCINO 540.00
059-233-014-000 21 PALAZZO WAY 540.00
059-233-015-000 25 PALAZZO WAY 540.00
059-233-016-000 29 PALAZZO WAY 540.00
059-233-017-000 33 PALAZZO WAY 540.00
059-233-018-000 37 PALAZZO WAY 540.00
059-233-019-000 41 PALAZZO WAY 540.00
059-233-020-000 45 PALAZZO WAY 540.00
059-233-021-000 49 PALAZZO WAY 540.00
059-233-022-000 53 PALAZZO WAY 540.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 11 of 45 05/11/2026 05:11:56PM 163
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District Zone 1 - La Vigne Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2026/27
APN Site Address Assessment Total
059-233-023-000 57 PALAZZO WAY 540.00
059-241-001-000 30 VIA TREVISO 540.00
059-241-002-000 26 VIA TREVISO 540.00
059-241-003-000 22 VIA TREVISO 540.00
059-241-004-000 18 VIA TREVISO 540.00
059-241-005-000 14 VIA TREVISO 540.00
059-241-006-000 10 VIA TREVISO 540.00
059-241-007-000 6 VIA TREVISO 540.00
059-241-008-000 2 VIA TREVISO 540.00
059-241-009-000 22 SARCEDO WAY 540.00
059-241-010-000 26 SARCEDO WAY 540.00
059-241-011-000 30 SARCEDO WAY 540.00
059-241-012-000 34 SARCEDO WAY 540.00
059-241-013-000 38 SARCEDO WAY 540.00
059-241-014-000 42 SARCEDO WAY 540.00
059-241-015-000 46 SARCEDO WAY 540.00
059-241-016-000 50 SARCEDO WAY 540.00
059-241-018-000 54 SARCEDO WAY 540.00
059-241-019-000 58 SARCEDO WAY 540.00
059-241-020-000 62 SARCEDO WAY 540.00
059-241-021-000 66 SARCEDO WAY 540.00
059-241-022-000 70 SARCEDO WAY 540.00
059-241-023-000 74 SARCEDO WAY 540.00
059-241-024-000 78 SARCEDO WAY 540.00
059-241-025-000 82 SARCEDO WAY 540.00
059-241-026-000 86 SARCEDO WAY 540.00
059-241-027-000 90 SARCEDO WAY 540.00
059-241-028-000 94 SARCEDO WAY 540.00
059-241-029-000 98 SARCEDO WAY 540.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 12 of 45 05/11/2026 05:11:56PM 164
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District Zone 1 - La Vigne Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2026/27
APN Site Address Assessment Total
059-242-001-000 55 SARCEDO WAY 540.00
059-242-002-000 59 SARCEDO WAY 540.00
059-242-003-000 35 VIA PESARO 540.00
059-242-004-000 15 VIA PESARO 540.00
059-242-005-000 11 VIA PESARO 540.00
059-242-006-000 7 VIA PESARO 540.00
059-242-007-000 3 VIA PESARO 540.00
059-243-001-000 75 SARCEDO WAY 540.00
059-243-002-000 79 SARCEDO WAY 540.00
059-243-003-000 83 SARCEDO WAY 540.00
059-243-004-000 59 VIA TREVISO 540.00
059-243-005-000 55 VIA TREVISO 540.00
059-243-006-000 51 VIA TREVISO 540.00
059-243-016-000 2 VIA PESARO 540.00
059-243-017-000 6 VIA PESARO 540.00
059-243-018-000 10 VIA PESARO 540.00
059-243-019-000 14 VIA PESARO 540.00
059-243-020-000 18 VIA PESARO 540.00
059-243-021-000 22 VIA PESARO 540.00
059-243-022-000 26 VIA PESARO 540.00
059-243-023-000 30 VIA PESARO 540.00
059-243-024-000 47 VIA TREVISO 540.00
059-243-025-000 43 VIA TREVISO 540.00
059-243-026-000 39 VIA TREVISO 540.00
059-243-027-000 35 VIA TREVISO 540.00
059-243-028-000 31 VIA TREVISO 540.00
059-243-029-000 27 VIA TREVISO 540.00
059-243-030-000 23 VIA TREVISO 540.00
059-243-031-000 19 VIA TREVISO 540.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 13 of 45 05/11/2026 05:11:56PM 165
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District Zone 1 - La Vigne Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2026/27
APN Site Address Assessment Total
059-243-032-000 15 VIA TREVISO 540.00
059-244-001-000 34 VIA TREVISO 540.00
059-244-002-000 38 VIA TREVISO 540.00
059-244-003-000 42 VIA TREVISO 540.00
059-244-004-000 46 VIA TREVISO 540.00
059-244-005-000 50 VIA TREVISO 540.00
059-244-006-000 54 VIA TREVISO 540.00
059-244-007-000 58 VIA TREVISO 540.00
059-244-008-000 62 VIA TREVISO 540.00
059-244-009-000 66 VIA TREVISO 540.00
059-244-010-000 70 VIA TREVISO 540.00
059-244-011-000 2 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-244-012-000 6 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-244-013-000 10 VIA BELLAGIO 540.00
059-251-001-000 2 PALESTRINA CT 540.00
059-251-002-000 6 PALESTRINA CT 540.00
059-251-003-000 10 PALESTRINA CT 540.00
059-251-004-000 14 PALESTRINA CT 540.00
059-251-005-000 18 PALESTRINA CT 540.00
059-251-006-000 22 PALESTRINA CT 540.00
059-251-007-000 26 PALESTRINA CT 540.00
059-251-008-000 30 PALESTRINA CT 540.00
059-251-009-000 34 PALESTRINA CT 540.00
059-251-010-000 38 PALESTRINA DR 540.00
059-251-011-000 42 PALESTRINA DR 540.00
059-251-012-000 46 PALESTRINA DR 540.00
059-251-013-000 50 PALESTRINA DR 540.00
059-251-014-000 54 PALESTRINA DR 540.00
059-251-015-000 3 VIA MARCIANA 540.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 14 of 45 05/11/2026 05:11:56PM 166
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District Zone 1 - La Vigne Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2026/27
APN Site Address Assessment Total
059-251-016-000 7 VIA MARCIANA 540.00
059-251-017-000 11 VIA MARCIANA 540.00
059-251-018-000 15 VIA MARCIANA 540.00
059-251-019-000 19 VIA MARCIANA 540.00
059-251-020-000 23 VIA MARCIANA 540.00
059-251-021-000 27 VIA MARCIANA 540.00
059-251-022-000 31 VIA MARCIANA 540.00
059-251-023-000 35 VIA MARCIANA 540.00
059-251-024-000 39 VIA MARCIANA 540.00
059-252-001-000 43 VIA MARCIANA 540.00
059-252-002-000 47 VIA MARCIANA 540.00
059-252-003-000 51 VIA MARCIANA 540.00
059-252-004-000 55 VIA MARCIANA 540.00
059-254-001-000 3 MARCELLO CT 540.00
059-254-002-000 7 MARCELLO CT 540.00
059-254-003-000 11 MARCELLO CT 540.00
059-254-004-000 15 MARCELLO CT 540.00
059-254-005-000 19 MARCELLO CT 540.00
059-254-006-000 60 PALAZZO WAY 540.00
059-254-007-000 56 PALAZZO WAY 540.00
059-254-008-000 52 PALAZZO WAY 540.00
059-255-001-000 3 CAMERINO CT 540.00
059-255-002-000 7 CAMERINO CT 540.00
059-255-003-000 11 CAMERINO CT 540.00
059-255-004-000 15 CAMERINO CT 540.00
059-255-005-000 19 CAMERINO CT 540.00
059-255-006-000 18 MARCELLO CT 540.00
059-255-007-000 14 MARCELLO CT 540.00
059-255-008-000 10 MARCELLO CT 540.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 15 of 45 05/11/2026 05:11:56PM 167
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District Zone 1 - La Vigne Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2026/27
APN Site Address Assessment Total
059-255-009-000 6 MARCELLO CT 540.00
059-255-010-000 2 MARCELLO CT 540.00
059-256-001-000 3 PALESTRINA CT 540.00
059-256-002-000 7 PALESTRINA CT 540.00
059-256-003-000 11 PALESTRINA CT 540.00
059-256-004-000 15 PALESTRINA CT 540.00
059-256-005-000 19 PALESTRINA CT 540.00
059-256-006-000 2 TOLENTINO DR 540.00
059-256-007-000 6 TOLENTINO DR 540.00
059-256-008-000 10 TOLENTINO DR 540.00
059-256-009-000 14 CAMERINO CT 540.00
059-256-010-000 10 CAMERINO CT 540.00
059-256-011-000 6 CAMERINO CT 540.00
059-256-012-000 2 CAMERINO CT 540.00
059-257-001-000 2 VIA MARCIANA 540.00
059-257-002-000 6 VIA MARCIANA 540.00
059-257-003-000 10 VIA MARCIANA 540.00
059-257-004-000 14 VIA MARCIANA 540.00
059-257-005-000 18 VIA MARCIANA 540.00
059-257-006-000 22 VIA MARCIANA 540.00
059-257-007-000 26 VIA MARCIANA 540.00
059-257-008-000 68 PALAZZO WAY 540.00
059-257-009-000 64 PALAZZO WAY 540.00
059-257-010-000 31 TOLENTINO DR 540.00
059-257-011-000 27 TOLENTINO DR 540.00
059-257-012-000 23 TOLENTINO DR 540.00
059-257-013-000 19 TOLENTINO DR 540.00
059-257-014-000 15 TOLENTINO DR 540.00
059-257-015-000 11 TOLENTINO DR 540.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 16 of 45 05/11/2026 05:11:56PM 168
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District Zone 1 - La Vigne Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2026/27
APN Site Address Assessment Total
059-257-016-000 7 TOLENTINO DR 540.00
059-257-017-000 3 TOLENTINO DR 540.00
466 Accounts $251,640.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 17 of 45 05/11/2026 05:11:56PM 169
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District Zone 2 - Vintage Ranch Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2026/27
APN Site Address Assessment Total
059-080-012-000 100 TOSCANA DR $42,930.00
059-301-001-000 20 WHITE OAK DR 450.00
059-301-002-000 24 WHITE OAK DR 450.00
059-301-003-000 28 WHITE OAK DR 450.00
059-301-004-000 32 WHITE OAK DR 450.00
059-301-005-000 36 WHITE OAK DR 450.00
059-301-006-000 40 WHITE OAK DR 450.00
059-301-007-000 44 WHITE OAK DR 450.00
059-301-008-000 48 WHITE OAK DR 450.00
059-301-009-000 52 WHITE OAK DR 450.00
059-301-010-000 56 WHITE OAK DR 450.00
059-301-011-000 51 RENWOOD LN 450.00
059-301-012-000 47 RENWOOD LN 450.00
059-301-013-000 43 RENWOOD LN 450.00
059-301-014-000 39 RENWOOD LN 450.00
059-301-015-000 35 RENWOOD LN 450.00
059-301-016-000 31 RENWOOD LN 450.00
059-301-017-000 27 RENWOOD LN 450.00
059-301-018-000 23 RENWOOD LN 450.00
059-301-019-000 19 RENWOOD LN 450.00
059-302-001-000 39 WHITE OAK DR 450.00
059-302-002-000 35 WHITE OAK DR 450.00
059-302-003-000 31 WHITE OAK DR 450.00
059-302-004-000 27 WHITE OAK DR 450.00
059-302-005-000 23 WHITE OAK DR 450.00
059-302-006-000 19 WHITE OAK DR 450.00
059-302-007-000 11 RENWOOD PL 450.00
059-302-008-000 7 RENWOOD PL 450.00
059-302-011-000 2 RENWOOD PL 450.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 18 of 45 05/11/2026 05:11:56PM 170
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District Zone 2 - Vintage Ranch Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2026/27
APN Site Address Assessment Total
059-302-012-000 6 RENWOOD PL 450.00
059-302-013-000 10 RENWOOD PL 450.00
059-302-014-000 14 RENWOOD LN 450.00
059-302-015-000 18 RENWOOD LN 450.00
059-302-016-000 22 RENWOOD LN 450.00
059-302-017-000 26 RENWOOD LN 450.00
059-302-018-000 30 RENWOOD LN 450.00
059-302-019-000 34 RENWOOD LN 450.00
059-302-020-000 38 RENWOOD LN 450.00
059-302-021-000 42 RENWOOD LN 450.00
059-302-022-000 46 RENWOOD LN 450.00
059-302-023-000 50 RENWOOD LN 450.00
059-311-001-000 536 SILVER OAK TRL 450.00
059-311-002-000 532 SILVER OAK TRL 450.00
059-311-003-000 528 SILVER OAK TRL 450.00
059-311-004-000 524 SILVER OAK TRL 450.00
059-311-005-000 520 SILVER OAK TRL 450.00
059-311-006-000 516 SILVER OAK TRL 450.00
059-311-007-000 512 SILVER OAK TRL 450.00
059-311-008-000 508 SILVER OAK TRL 450.00
059-311-009-000 504 SILVER OAK TRL 450.00
059-311-010-000 500 SILVER OAK TRL 450.00
059-312-003-000 90 STONECREEK DR 450.00
059-312-004-000 86 STONECREEK DR 450.00
059-312-005-000 82 STONECREEK DR 450.00
059-312-006-000 78 STONECREEK DR 450.00
059-312-007-000 74 STONECREEK DR 450.00
059-312-008-000 70 STONECREEK DR 450.00
059-312-009-000 66 STONECREEK DR 450.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 19 of 45 05/11/2026 05:11:56PM 171
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District Zone 2 - Vintage Ranch Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2026/27
APN Site Address Assessment Total
059-312-010-000 62 STONECREEK DR 450.00
059-312-011-000 58 STONECREEK DR 450.00
059-312-012-000 54 STONECREEK DR 450.00
059-312-013-000 50 STONECREEK DR 450.00
059-312-014-000 46 STONECREEK DR 450.00
059-312-015-000 42 STONECREEK DR 450.00
059-312-016-000 38 STONECREEK DR 450.00
059-312-017-000 34 STONECREEK DR 450.00
059-312-018-000 30 STONECREEK DR 450.00
059-312-019-000 26 STONECREEK DR 450.00
059-312-020-000 22 STONECREEK DR 450.00
059-312-021-000 18 STONECREEK DR 450.00
059-312-022-000 14 STONECREEK DR 450.00
059-312-023-000 10 STONECREEK DR 450.00
059-312-024-000 6 STONECREEK DR 450.00
059-312-025-000 2 STONECREEK DR 450.00
059-312-026-000 98 STONECREEK DR 450.00
059-312-027-000 94 STONECREEK DR 450.00
059-313-001-000 75 STONECREEK DR 450.00
059-313-002-000 71 STONECREEK DR 450.00
059-313-003-000 67 STONECREEK DR 450.00
059-313-004-000 63 STONECREEK DR 450.00
059-313-005-000 59 STONECREEK DR 450.00
059-313-006-000 55 STONECREEK DR 450.00
059-313-007-000 51 STONECREEK DR 450.00
059-313-008-000 47 STONECREEK DR 450.00
059-313-009-000 43 STONECREEK DR 450.00
059-313-010-000 39 STONECREEK DR 450.00
059-313-011-000 35 STONECREEK DR 450.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 20 of 45 05/11/2026 05:11:56PM 172
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District Zone 2 - Vintage Ranch Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2026/27
APN Site Address Assessment Total
059-313-012-000 31 STONECREEK DR 450.00
059-313-013-000 27 STONECREEK DR 450.00
059-313-014-000 23 STONECREEK DR 450.00
059-313-015-000 19 STONECREEK DR 450.00
059-313-016-000 15 STONECREEK DR 450.00
059-313-017-000 11 STONECREEK DR 450.00
059-313-018-000 7 STONECREEK DR 450.00
059-313-019-000 3 STONECREEK DR 450.00
059-313-020-000 39 SEQUOIA GROVE WAY 450.00
059-313-021-000 35 SEQUOIA GROVE WAY 450.00
059-313-022-000 31 SEQUOIA GROVE WAY 450.00
059-313-023-000 27 SEQUOIA GROVE WAY 450.00
059-313-024-000 23 SEQUOIA GROVE WAY 450.00
059-313-025-000 19 SEQUOIA GROVE WAY 450.00
059-313-026-000 2 KARLY CT 450.00
059-313-027-000 6 KARLY CT 450.00
059-313-028-000 10 KARLY CT 450.00
059-313-029-000 14 KARLY CT 450.00
059-313-030-000 18 KARLY CT 450.00
059-313-031-000 22 KARLY CT 450.00
059-313-032-000 23 KARLY CT 450.00
059-313-033-000 19 KARLY CT 450.00
059-313-034-000 15 KARLY CT 450.00
059-313-035-000 11 KARLY CT 450.00
059-313-036-000 7 KARLY CT 450.00
059-313-037-000 3 KARLY CT 450.00
059-313-038-000 2 DEAVER CT 450.00
059-313-039-000 6 DEAVER CT 450.00
059-313-040-000 10 DEAVER CT 450.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 21 of 45 05/11/2026 05:11:56PM 173
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District Zone 2 - Vintage Ranch Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2026/27
APN Site Address Assessment Total
059-313-041-000 14 DEAVER CT 450.00
059-313-042-000 18 DEAVER CT 450.00
059-313-043-000 11 DEAVER CT 450.00
059-313-044-000 7 DEAVER CT 450.00
059-313-045-000 3 DEAVER CT 450.00
059-313-046-000 36 TOSCANA DR 450.00
059-313-047-000 40 TOSCANA DR 450.00
059-314-001-000 63 TOSCANA DR 450.00
059-314-002-000 59 TOSCANA DR 450.00
059-314-003-000 55 TOSCANA DR 450.00
059-314-004-000 51 TOSCANA DR 450.00
059-314-005-000 47 TOSCANA DR 450.00
059-314-006-000 43 TOSCANA DR 450.00
059-314-007-000 39 TOSCANA DR 450.00
059-314-008-000 35 TOSCANA DR 450.00
059-314-009-000 31 TOSCANA DR 450.00
059-314-010-000 27 TOSCANA DR 450.00
059-314-011-000 23 TOSCANA DR 450.00
059-314-012-000 19 TOSCANA DR 450.00
059-314-013-000 15 TOSCANA DR 450.00
059-314-014-000 11 TOSCANA DR 450.00
059-314-015-000 7 TOSCANA DR 450.00
059-314-016-000 3 TOSCANA DR 450.00
059-314-017-000 7 SEQUOIA GROVE CT 450.00
059-314-018-000 3 SEQUOIA GROVE CT 450.00
059-314-019-000 2 SEQUOIA GROVE CT 450.00
059-314-020-000 6 SEQUOIA GROVE CT 450.00
059-314-021-000 10 SEQUOIA GROVE CT 450.00
059-314-022-000 14 SEQUOIA GROVE WAY 450.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 22 of 45 05/11/2026 05:11:56PM 174
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District Zone 2 - Vintage Ranch Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2026/27
APN Site Address Assessment Total
059-314-023-000 18 SEQUOIA GROVE WAY 450.00
059-314-024-000 22 SEQUOIA GROVE WAY 450.00
059-314-025-000 26 SEQUOIA GROVE WAY 450.00
059-314-026-000 30 SEQUOIA GROVE WAY 450.00
059-314-027-000 34 SEQUOIA GROVE WAY 450.00
059-314-028-000 38 SEQUOIA GROVE WAY 450.00
059-314-029-000 42 SEQUOIA GROVE WAY 450.00
059-314-030-000 46 SEQUOIA GROVE WAY 450.00
059-314-031-000 50 SEQUOIA GROVE WAY 450.00
059-314-032-000 54 SEQUOIA GROVE WAY 450.00
059-314-033-000 58 SEQUOIA GROVE WAY 450.00
059-321-001-000 3 SPINETTA CT 450.00
059-321-002-000 7 SPINETTA CT 450.00
059-321-003-000 11 SPINETTA CT 450.00
059-321-004-000 15 SPINETTA CT 450.00
059-321-005-000 14 SPINETTA CT 450.00
059-321-006-000 10 SPINETTA CT 450.00
059-321-007-000 6 SPINETTA CT 450.00
059-321-008-000 2 SPINETTA CT 450.00
059-322-001-000 94 OAKSTONE WAY 450.00
059-322-002-000 98 OAKSTONE WAY 450.00
059-322-003-000 102 OAKSTONE WAY 450.00
059-322-004-000 106 OAKSTONE WAY 450.00
059-322-005-000 110 OAKSTONE WAY 450.00
059-322-006-000 114 OAKSTONE WAY 450.00
059-322-007-000 118 OAKSTONE WAY 450.00
059-322-008-000 122 OAKSTONE WAY 450.00
059-322-009-000 126 OAKSTONE WAY 450.00
059-323-001-000 101 OAKSTONE WAY 450.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 23 of 45 05/11/2026 05:11:56PM 175
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District Zone 2 - Vintage Ranch Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2026/27
APN Site Address Assessment Total
059-323-002-000 97 OAKSTONE WAY 450.00
059-323-003-000 93 OAKSTONE WAY 450.00
059-323-004-000 89 OAKSTONE WAY 450.00
059-323-005-000 85 OAKSTONE WAY 450.00
059-323-006-000 81 OAKSTONE WAY 450.00
059-323-007-000 77 OAKSTONE WAY 450.00
059-323-008-000 73 OAKSTONE WAY 450.00
059-323-009-000 69 OAKSTONE WAY 450.00
059-323-010-000 65 OAKSTONE WAY 450.00
059-324-002-000 90 OAKSTONE WAY 450.00
059-324-003-000 86 OAKSTONE WAY 450.00
059-324-004-000 82 OAKSTONE WAY 450.00
059-324-005-000 78 OAKSTONE WAY 450.00
059-324-006-000 74 OAKSTONE WAY 450.00
059-324-007-000 70 OAKSTONE WAY 450.00
059-324-008-000 66 OAKSTONE WAY 450.00
059-324-009-000 62 OAKSTONE WAY 450.00
059-324-010-000 58 OAKSTONE WAY 450.00
059-324-011-000 54 OAKSTONE WAY 450.00
059-324-012-000 50 OAKSTONE WAY 450.00
059-324-013-000 46 OAKSTONE WAY 450.00
059-325-001-000 60 WHITE OAK DR 450.00
059-325-002-000 64 WHITE OAK DR 450.00
059-325-003-000 68 WHITE OAK DR 450.00
059-325-004-000 72 WHITE OAK DR 450.00
059-325-005-000 76 WHITE OAK DR 450.00
059-325-006-000 80 WHITE OAK DR 450.00
059-325-007-000 84 WHITE OAK DR 450.00
059-325-008-000 88 WHITE OAK DR 450.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 24 of 45 05/11/2026 05:11:56PM 176
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District Zone 2 - Vintage Ranch Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2026/27
APN Site Address Assessment Total
059-325-009-000 92 WHITE OAK DR 450.00
059-325-010-000 96 WHITE OAK DR 450.00
059-325-011-000 91 RENWOOD LN 450.00
059-325-012-000 87 RENWOOD LN 450.00
059-325-013-000 83 RENWOOD LN 450.00
059-325-014-000 79 RENWOOD LN 450.00
059-325-015-000 75 RENWOOD LN 450.00
059-325-016-000 71 RENWOOD LN 450.00
059-325-017-000 67 RENWOOD LN 450.00
059-325-018-000 63 RENWOOD LN 450.00
059-325-019-000 59 RENWOOD LN 450.00
059-325-020-000 55 RENWOOD LN 450.00
059-326-001-000 54 RENWOOD LN 450.00
059-326-002-000 58 RENWOOD LN 450.00
059-326-003-000 62 RENWOOD LN 450.00
059-326-004-000 66 RENWOOD LN 450.00
059-326-005-000 70 RENWOOD LN 450.00
059-326-006-000 74 RENWOOD LN 450.00
059-326-007-000 78 RENWOOD LN 450.00
059-326-008-000 82 RENWOOD LN 450.00
059-326-009-000 86 RENWOOD LN 450.00
059-326-010-000 90 RENWOOD LN 450.00
059-326-011-000 94 RENWOOD LN 450.00
059-331-001-000 48 IRONHORSE DR 450.00
059-331-002-000 44 IRONHORSE DR 450.00
059-331-003-000 40 IRONHORSE DR 450.00
059-331-005-000 14 IRONHORSE DR 450.00
059-331-006-000 10 IRONHORSE DR 450.00
059-331-007-000 6 IRONHORSE DR 450.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 25 of 45 05/11/2026 05:11:56PM 177
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District Zone 2 - Vintage Ranch Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2026/27
APN Site Address Assessment Total
059-331-008-000 2 IRONHORSE DR 450.00
059-331-009-000 2 OAKSTONE CT 450.00
059-331-010-000 6 OAKSTONE CT 450.00
059-331-011-000 10 OAKSTONE CT 450.00
059-331-012-000 14 OAKSTONE WAY 450.00
059-331-013-000 18 OAKSTONE WAY 450.00
059-331-014-000 22 OAKSTONE WAY 450.00
059-331-015-000 26 OAKSTONE WAY 450.00
059-331-016-000 30 OAKSTONE WAY 450.00
059-331-017-000 34 OAKSTONE WAY 450.00
059-331-018-000 38 OAKSTONE WAY 450.00
059-331-019-000 42 OAKSTONE WAY 450.00
059-332-001-000 39 IRONHORSE DR 450.00
059-332-002-000 35 IRONHORSE DR 450.00
059-332-003-000 31 IRONHORSE DR 450.00
059-332-004-000 27 IRONHORSE DR 450.00
059-332-005-000 23 IRONHORSE DR 450.00
059-332-006-000 19 IRONHORSE DR 450.00
059-332-007-000 15 IRONHORSE DR 450.00
059-332-008-000 11 IRONHORSE DR 450.00
059-332-009-000 7 IRONHORSE DR 450.00
059-332-010-000 3 IRONHORSE DR 450.00
059-332-011-000 2 SIRAH DR 450.00
059-332-012-000 6 SIRAH DR 450.00
059-332-013-000 10 SIRAH DR 450.00
059-332-014-000 14 SIRAH DR 450.00
059-332-015-000 18 SIRAH DR 450.00
059-332-016-000 22 SIRAH DR 450.00
059-332-017-000 26 SIRAH DR 450.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 26 of 45 05/11/2026 05:11:56PM 178
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District Zone 2 - Vintage Ranch Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2026/27
APN Site Address Assessment Total
059-332-018-000 30 SIRAH DR 450.00
059-332-019-000 34 SIRAH DR 450.00
059-332-020-000 38 SIRAH DR 450.00
059-333-001-000 39 SIRAH DR 450.00
059-333-002-000 35 SIRAH DR 450.00
059-333-003-000 31 SIRAH DR 450.00
059-333-004-000 27 SIRAH DR 450.00
059-333-005-000 23 SIRAH DR 450.00
059-333-006-000 19 SIRAH DR 450.00
059-333-007-000 15 SIRAH DR 450.00
059-333-008-000 11 SIRAH DR 450.00
059-333-009-000 7 SIRAH DR 450.00
059-333-010-000 3 SIRAH DR 450.00
059-341-001-000 584 GRANITE SPRINGS WAY 450.00
059-341-002-000 580 GRANITE SPRINGS WAY 450.00
059-341-003-000 576 GRANITE SPRINGS WAY 450.00
059-341-004-000 572 GRANITE SPRINGS WAY 450.00
059-341-005-000 568 GRANITE SPRINGS WAY 450.00
059-341-006-000 564 GRANITE SPRINGS WAY 450.00
059-341-007-000 560 GRANITE SPRINGS WAY 450.00
059-341-008-000 556 GRANITE SPRINGS WAY 450.00
059-341-009-000 552 GRANITE SPRINGS WAY 450.00
059-341-010-000 548 GRANITE SPRINGS WAY 450.00
059-341-011-000 544 GRANITE SPRINGS WAY 450.00
059-341-012-000 540 GRANITE SPRINGS WAY 450.00
059-341-013-000 536 GRANITE SPRINGS WAY 450.00
059-341-014-000 532 GRANITE SPRINGS WAY 450.00
059-341-015-000 528 GRANITE SPRINGS WAY 450.00
059-341-016-000 524 GRANITE SPRINGS WAY 450.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 27 of 45 05/11/2026 05:11:56PM 179
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District Zone 2 - Vintage Ranch Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2026/27
APN Site Address Assessment Total
059-341-017-000 520 GRANITE SPRINGS WAY 450.00
059-341-018-000 516 GRANITE SPRINGS WAY 450.00
059-341-019-000 512 GRANITE SPRINGS WAY 450.00
059-341-020-000 508 GRANITE SPRINGS WAY 450.00
059-341-021-000 504 GRANITE SPRINGS WAY 450.00
059-341-022-000 500 GRANITE SPRINGS WAY 450.00
059-342-001-000 575 GRANITE SPRINGS WAY 450.00
059-342-002-000 571 GRANITE SPRINGS WAY 450.00
059-342-003-000 567 GRANITE SPRINGS WAY 450.00
059-342-004-000 563 GRANITE SPRINGS WAY 450.00
059-342-005-000 559 GRANITE SPRINGS WAY 450.00
059-342-006-000 3 SADIE PL 450.00
059-342-007-000 2 SADIE PL 450.00
059-342-008-000 6 SADIE PL 450.00
059-342-009-000 545 GRANITE SPRINGS WAY 450.00
059-342-010-000 541 GRANITE SPRINGS WAY 450.00
059-342-011-000 537 GRANITE SPRINGS WAY 450.00
059-342-012-000 533 GRANITE SPRINGS WAY 450.00
059-342-013-000 529 GRANITE SPRINGS WAY 450.00
059-342-014-000 27 MARSALA PL 450.00
059-342-015-000 23 MARSALA PL 450.00
059-342-016-000 19 MARSALA PL 450.00
059-342-017-000 15 MARSALA PL 450.00
059-342-018-000 11 MARSALA PL 450.00
059-342-019-000 7 MARSALA PL 450.00
059-342-020-000 3 MARSALA PL 450.00
059-342-021-000 2 MARSALA PL 450.00
059-342-022-000 6 MARSALA PL 450.00
059-342-023-000 10 MARSALA PL 450.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 28 of 45 05/11/2026 05:11:56PM 180
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District Zone 2 - Vintage Ranch Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2026/27
APN Site Address Assessment Total
059-342-024-000 14 MARSALA PL 450.00
059-342-025-000 18 MARSALA PL 450.00
059-342-026-000 22 MARSALA PL 450.00
059-342-027-000 26 MARSALA PL 450.00
059-342-028-000 30 MARSALA PL 450.00
059-361-001-000 227 CANTADA WAY 450.00
059-361-002-000 231 CANTADA WAY 450.00
059-361-003-000 235 CANTADA WAY 450.00
059-361-004-000 239 CANTADA WAY 450.00
059-361-005-000 243 CANTADA WAY 450.00
059-361-006-000 247 CANTADA WAY 450.00
059-361-007-000 251 CANTADA WAY 450.00
059-361-008-000 255 CANTADA WAY 450.00
059-361-009-000 259 CANTADA WAY 450.00
059-361-010-000 263 CANTADA WAY 450.00
059-361-011-000 267 CANTADA WAY 450.00
059-361-012-000 271 CANTADA WAY 450.00
059-361-013-000 275 CANTADA WAY 450.00
059-361-014-000 279 CANTADA WAY 450.00
059-361-015-000 283 CANTADA WAY 450.00
059-361-016-000 287 CANTADA WAY 450.00
059-361-017-000 291 CANTADA WAY 450.00
059-361-018-000 295 CANTADA CT 450.00
059-361-019-000 299 CANTADA CT 450.00
059-361-020-000 311 CANTADA CT 450.00
059-361-021-000 312 CANTADA CT 450.00
059-361-022-000 308 CANTADA CT 450.00
059-361-023-000 304 CANTADA CT 450.00
059-361-024-000 300 CANTADA CT 450.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 29 of 45 05/11/2026 05:11:56PM 181
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District Zone 2 - Vintage Ranch Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2026/27
APN Site Address Assessment Total
059-361-025-000 236 SAGEBRUSH LN 450.00
059-361-026-000 232 SAGEBRUSH LN 450.00
059-361-027-000 228 SAGEBRUSH LN 450.00
059-361-028-000 19 FARENTINO PL 450.00
059-361-029-000 15 FARENTINO PL 450.00
059-361-030-000 11 FARENTINO PL 450.00
059-361-031-000 7 FARENTINO PL 450.00
059-361-032-000 3 FARENTINO PL 450.00
059-362-001-000 222 CANTADA WAY 450.00
059-362-002-000 226 CANTADA WAY 450.00
059-362-003-000 230 CANTADA WAY 450.00
059-362-004-000 234 CANTADA WAY 450.00
059-362-005-000 238 CANTADA WAY 450.00
059-362-006-000 242 CANTADA WAY 450.00
059-362-007-000 264 CANTADA WAY 450.00
059-362-008-000 268 CANTADA WAY 450.00
059-362-009-000 272 CANTADA WAY 450.00
059-362-010-000 235 SORRENTO LN 450.00
059-362-011-000 231 SORRENTO LN 450.00
059-362-012-000 227 SORRENTO LN 450.00
059-362-013-000 223 SORRENTO LN 450.00
059-362-014-000 219 SORRENTO LN 450.00
059-362-015-000 215 SORRENTO LN 450.00
059-363-001-000 206 SORRENTO LN 450.00
059-363-002-000 210 SORRENTO LN 450.00
059-363-003-000 214 SORRENTO LN 450.00
059-363-004-000 218 SORRENTO LN 450.00
059-363-005-000 222 SORRENTO LN 450.00
059-363-006-000 226 SORRENTO LN 450.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 30 of 45 05/11/2026 05:11:56PM 182
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District Zone 2 - Vintage Ranch Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2026/27
APN Site Address Assessment Total
059-363-007-000 230 SORRENTO LN 450.00
059-363-008-000 234 SORRENTO LN 450.00
059-363-009-000 282 CANTADA WAY 450.00
059-363-010-000 286 CANTADA WAY 450.00
059-363-011-000 290 CANTADA WAY 450.00
059-363-012-000 231 SAGEBRUSH LN 450.00
059-363-013-000 227 SAGEBRUSH LN 450.00
059-363-014-000 223 SAGEBRUSH LN 450.00
059-363-015-000 219 SAGEBRUSH LN 450.00
059-363-016-000 215 SAGEBRUSH LN 450.00
059-363-017-000 211 SAGEBRUSH LN 450.00
059-363-018-000 207 SAGEBRUSH LN 450.00
059-363-019-000 203 SAGEBRUSH LN 450.00
059-364-001-000 212 SAGEBRUSH LN 450.00
059-364-002-000 216 SAGEBRUSH LN 450.00
059-364-003-000 220 SAGEBRUSH LN 450.00
059-364-004-000 18 FARENTINO PL 450.00
059-364-005-000 14 FARENTINO PL 450.00
059-364-006-000 10 FARENTINO PL 450.00
059-364-007-000 6 FARENTINO PL 450.00
059-364-008-000 2 FARENTINO PL 450.00
059-364-009-000 3 SELVINO CT 450.00
059-364-010-000 7 SELVINO CT 450.00
059-364-011-000 11 SELVINO CT 450.00
059-364-012-000 15 SELVINO CT 450.00
059-371-001-000 350 SUMMERWOOD DR 450.00
059-371-002-000 346 SUMMERWOOD DR 450.00
059-371-003-000 342 SUMMERWOOD DR 450.00
059-371-004-000 338 SUMMERWOOD DR 450.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 31 of 45 05/11/2026 05:11:56PM 183
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District Zone 2 - Vintage Ranch Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2026/27
APN Site Address Assessment Total
059-371-005-000 334 SUMMERWOOD DR 450.00
059-371-006-000 330 SUMMERWOOD DR 450.00
059-371-007-000 326 SUMMERWOOD DR 450.00
059-371-008-000 322 SUMMERWOOD DR 450.00
059-371-009-000 318 SUMMERWOOD DR 450.00
059-371-010-000 314 SUMMERWOOD DR 450.00
059-371-011-000 310 SUMMERWOOD DR 450.00
059-371-012-000 306 SUMMERWOOD DR 450.00
059-371-013-000 302 SUMMERWOOD DR 450.00
059-371-014-000 126 TAPESTRY LN 450.00
059-371-015-000 122 TAPESTRY LN 450.00
059-371-016-000 118 TAPESTRY LN 450.00
059-371-017-000 114 TAPESTRY LN 450.00
059-371-018-000 110 TAPESTRY LN 450.00
059-371-019-000 106 TAPESTRY LN 450.00
059-371-020-000 102 TAPESTRY LN 450.00
059-371-021-000 103 TERRAZZO LN 450.00
059-371-022-000 107 TERRAZZO LN 450.00
059-371-023-000 111 TERRAZZO LN 450.00
059-371-024-000 115 TERRAZZO LN 450.00
059-371-025-000 119 TERRAZZO LN 450.00
059-371-026-000 123 TERRAZZO LN 450.00
059-371-027-000 127 TERRAZZO LN 450.00
059-371-028-000 131 TERRAZZO LN 450.00
059-371-029-000 135 TERRAZZO LN 450.00
059-371-030-000 139 TERRAZZO LN 450.00
059-371-031-000 143 TERRAZZO LN 450.00
059-371-032-000 147 TERRAZZO LN 450.00
059-371-033-000 151 TERRAZZO LN 450.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 32 of 45 05/11/2026 05:11:56PM 184
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District Zone 2 - Vintage Ranch Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2026/27
APN Site Address Assessment Total
059-371-034-000 155 TERRAZZO LN 450.00
059-371-035-000 159 TERRAZZO LN 450.00
059-371-036-000 163 TERRAZZO LN 450.00
059-371-037-000 167 TERRAZZO LN 450.00
059-371-038-000 171 TERRAZZO LN 450.00
059-371-039-000 175 TERRAZZO LN 450.00
059-372-001-000 181 GOLD VALLEY WAY 450.00
059-372-002-000 177 GOLD VALLEY WAY 450.00
059-372-003-000 173 GOLD VALLEY WAY 450.00
059-372-004-000 106 TERRAZZO LN 450.00
059-372-005-000 110 TERRAZZO LN 450.00
059-372-006-000 114 TERRAZZO LN 450.00
059-372-007-000 118 TERRAZZO LN 450.00
059-372-008-000 134 TERRAZZO LN 450.00
059-372-009-000 138 TERRAZZO LN 450.00
059-372-010-000 142 TERRAZZO LN 450.00
059-372-011-000 146 TERRAZZO LN 450.00
059-372-012-000 160 TERRAZZO LN 450.00
059-372-013-000 164 TERRAZZO LN 450.00
059-372-014-000 11 MOSAIC CT 450.00
059-372-015-000 7 MOSAIC CT 450.00
059-372-016-000 3 MOSAIC CT 450.00
059-372-017-000 2 MOSAIC CT 450.00
059-372-018-000 6 MOSAIC CT 450.00
059-372-019-000 10 MOSAIC CT 450.00
059-372-020-000 12 MOSAIC CT 450.00
059-373-001-000 223 CANTADA WAY 450.00
059-373-002-000 219 CANTADA WAY 450.00
059-373-003-000 215 CANTADA WAY 450.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 33 of 45 05/11/2026 05:11:56PM 185
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District Zone 2 - Vintage Ranch Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2026/27
APN Site Address Assessment Total
059-373-004-000 211 CANTADA WAY 450.00
059-374-001-000 202 CANTADA WAY 450.00
059-374-002-000 206 CANTADA WAY 450.00
059-374-003-000 210 CANTADA WAY 450.00
059-374-004-000 214 CANTADA WAY 450.00
059-374-005-000 218 CANTADA WAY 450.00
059-374-006-000 211 SORRENTO LN 450.00
059-374-007-000 207 SORRENTO LN 450.00
059-374-008-000 203 SORRENTO LN 450.00
059-375-001-000 178 GOLD VALLEY WAY 450.00
059-375-002-000 174 GOLD VALLEY WAY 450.00
059-375-003-000 170 GOLD VALLEY WAY 450.00
059-375-004-000 166 GOLD VALLEY WAY 450.00
059-381-001-000 22 SELVINO CT 450.00
059-381-002-000 18 SELVINO CT 450.00
059-381-003-000 14 SELVINO CT 450.00
059-381-004-000 10 SELVINO CT 450.00
059-381-005-000 6 SELVINO CT 450.00
059-383-001-000 151 HORIZON WAY 450.00
059-383-002-000 147 HORIZON WAY 450.00
059-383-003-000 143 HORIZON WAY 450.00
059-383-004-000 139 HORIZON WAY 450.00
059-383-005-000 135 HORIZON WAY 450.00
059-383-006-000 131 HORIZON WAY 450.00
059-383-007-000 127 HORIZON WAY 450.00
059-383-008-000 123 HORIZON WAY 450.00
059-383-009-000 119 HORIZON WAY 450.00
059-383-010-000 115 HORIZON WAY 450.00
059-383-011-000 111 HORIZON WAY 450.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 34 of 45 05/11/2026 05:11:56PM 186
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District Zone 2 - Vintage Ranch Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2026/27
APN Site Address Assessment Total
059-383-012-000 107 HORIZON WAY 450.00
059-383-013-000 103 HORIZON WAY 450.00
059-384-001-000 23 HORIZON CT 450.00
059-384-002-000 19 HORIZON CT 450.00
059-384-003-000 15 HORIZON CT 450.00
059-384-004-000 11 HORIZON CT 450.00
059-384-005-000 7 HORIZON CT 450.00
059-385-001-000 134 HORIZON WAY 450.00
059-385-002-000 130 HORIZON WAY 450.00
059-385-003-000 126 HORIZON WAY 450.00
059-385-004-000 122 HORIZON WAY 450.00
059-385-005-000 118 HORIZON WAY 450.00
059-385-006-000 114 HORIZON WAY 450.00
059-385-007-000 110 HORIZON WAY 450.00
059-385-008-000 106 HORIZON WAY 450.00
059-385-009-000 102 HORIZON WAY 450.00
059-385-010-000 103 HALLMARK LN 450.00
059-385-011-000 107 HALLMARK LN 450.00
059-385-012-000 111 HALLMARK LN 450.00
059-385-013-000 115 HALLMARK LN 450.00
059-385-014-000 119 HALLMARK LN 450.00
059-385-015-000 123 HALLMARK LN 450.00
059-385-016-000 127 HALLMARK LN 450.00
059-386-001-000 26 HORIZON CT 450.00
059-386-002-000 22 HORIZON CT 450.00
059-386-003-000 18 HORIZON CT 450.00
059-386-004-000 14 HORIZON CT 450.00
059-386-005-000 10 HORIZON CT 450.00
059-386-006-000 6 HORIZON CT 450.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 35 of 45 05/11/2026 05:11:56PM 187
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District Zone 2 - Vintage Ranch Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2026/27
APN Site Address Assessment Total
059-386-007-000 2 HORIZON CT 450.00
059-386-008-000 3 HALLMARK CT 450.00
059-386-009-000 7 HALLMARK CT 450.00
059-386-010-000 11 HALLMARK CT 450.00
059-386-011-000 15 HALLMARK CT 450.00
059-386-012-000 19 HALLMARK CT 450.00
059-386-013-000 23 HALLMARK CT 450.00
059-386-014-000 27 HALLMARK CT 450.00
059-387-001-000 26 HALLMARK CT 450.00
059-387-002-000 22 HALLMARK CT 450.00
059-387-003-000 18 HALLMARK CT 450.00
059-387-004-000 14 HALLMARK CT 450.00
059-392-001-000 102 TUSCAN OAK TRL 450.00
059-392-002-000 106 TUSCAN OAK TRL 450.00
059-392-003-000 110 TUSCAN OAK TRL 450.00
059-392-004-000 114 TUSCAN OAK TRL 450.00
059-392-005-000 118 TUSCAN OAK TRL 450.00
059-392-006-000 122 TUSCAN OAK TRL 450.00
059-392-007-000 126 TUSCAN OAK TRL 450.00
059-392-008-000 130 TUSCAN OAK TRL 450.00
059-392-009-000 134 TUSCAN OAK TRL 450.00
059-392-010-000 138 TUSCAN OAK TRL 450.00
059-392-011-000 253 GOLDEN BROOK LN 450.00
059-392-012-000 251 GOLDEN BROOK LN 450.00
059-392-013-000 143 CRESTWOOD LN 450.00
059-392-014-000 139 CRESTWOOD LN 450.00
059-392-015-000 135 CRESTWOOD LN 450.00
059-392-016-000 131 CRESTWOOD LN 450.00
059-392-017-000 127 CRESTWOOD LN 450.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 36 of 45 05/11/2026 05:11:56PM 188
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District Zone 2 - Vintage Ranch Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2026/27
APN Site Address Assessment Total
059-392-018-000 123 CRESTWOOD LN 450.00
059-392-019-000 119 CRESTWOOD LN 450.00
059-392-020-000 115 CRESTWOOD LN 450.00
059-392-021-000 111 CRESTWOOD LN 450.00
059-392-022-000 107 CRESTWOOD LN 450.00
059-392-023-000 103 CRESTWOOD LN 450.00
059-393-001-000 102 CRESTWOOD LN 450.00
059-393-002-000 106 CRESTWOOD LN 450.00
059-393-003-000 110 CRESTWOOD LN 450.00
059-393-004-000 114 CRESTWOOD LN 450.00
059-393-005-000 118 CRESTWOOD LN 450.00
059-393-006-000 122 CRESTWOOD LN 450.00
059-393-007-000 126 CRESTWOOD LN 450.00
059-393-008-000 130 CRESTWOOD LN 450.00
059-393-009-000 134 CRESTWOOD LN 450.00
059-393-010-000 138 CRESTWOOD LN 450.00
059-393-011-000 142 CRESTWOOD LN 450.00
059-393-012-000 139 SUMMERWOOD DR 450.00
059-393-013-000 135 SUMMERWOOD DR 450.00
059-393-014-000 131 SUMMERWOOD DR 450.00
059-393-015-000 127 SUMMERWOOD DR 450.00
059-393-016-000 123 SUMMERWOOD DR 450.00
059-393-017-000 119 SUMMERWOOD DR 450.00
059-393-018-000 115 SUMMERWOOD DR 450.00
059-393-019-000 111 SUMMERWOOD DR 450.00
059-393-020-000 107 SUMMERWOOD DR 450.00
059-393-021-000 103 SUMMERWOOD DR 450.00
059-394-001-000 127 TAPESTRY LN 450.00
059-394-002-000 123 TAPESTRY LN 450.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 37 of 45 05/11/2026 05:11:56PM 189
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District Zone 2 - Vintage Ranch Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2026/27
APN Site Address Assessment Total
059-394-003-000 119 TAPESTRY LN 450.00
059-394-004-000 115 TAPESTRY LN 450.00
059-394-005-000 111 TAPESTRY LN 450.00
059-394-006-000 107 TAPESTRY LN 450.00
059-394-007-000 147 GOLD VALLEY WAY 450.00
059-394-008-000 143 GOLD VALLEY WAY 450.00
059-394-009-000 139 GOLD VALLEY WAY 450.00
059-394-010-000 135 GOLD VALLEY WAY 450.00
059-394-011-000 102 GOLDEN BROOK LN 450.00
059-394-012-000 106 GOLDEN BROOK LN 450.00
059-394-013-000 110 GOLDEN BROOK LN 450.00
059-394-014-000 202 SUMMERWOOD DR 450.00
059-394-015-000 206 SUMMERWOOD DR 450.00
059-395-001-000 102 SUMMERWOOD DR 450.00
059-395-002-000 106 SUMMERWOOD DR 450.00
059-395-003-000 110 SUMMERWOOD DR 450.00
059-395-004-000 114 SUMMERWOOD DR 450.00
059-395-005-000 118 SUMMERWOOD DR 450.00
059-395-006-000 122 SUMMERWOOD DR 450.00
059-395-007-000 126 SUMMERWOOD DR 450.00
059-395-008-000 130 SUMMERWOOD DR 450.00
059-395-009-000 111 GOLDEN BROOK LN 450.00
059-395-010-000 107 GOLDEN BROOK LN 450.00
059-395-011-000 103 GOLDEN BROOK LN 450.00
059-395-012-000 123 GOLD VALLEY CT 450.00
059-395-013-000 119 GOLD VALLEY CT 450.00
059-395-014-000 115 GOLD VALLEY CT 450.00
059-395-015-000 102 GOLD VALLEY CT 450.00
059-395-016-000 106 GOLD VALLEY CT 450.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 38 of 45 05/11/2026 05:11:56PM 190
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District Zone 2 - Vintage Ranch Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2026/27
APN Site Address Assessment Total
059-395-017-000 110 GOLD VALLEY CT 450.00
059-395-018-000 114 GOLD VALLEY CT 450.00
059-395-019-000 118 GOLD VALLEY CT 450.00
059-395-020-000 122 GOLD VALLEY CT 450.00
059-395-021-000 126 GOLD VALLEY CT 450.00
059-395-022-000 130 GOLD VALLEY CT 450.00
059-395-023-000 134 GOLD VALLEY WAY 450.00
059-395-024-000 138 GOLD VALLEY WAY 450.00
059-395-025-000 142 GOLD VALLEY WAY 450.00
059-395-026-000 146 GOLD VALLEY WAY 450.00
059-395-027-000 150 GOLD VALLEY WAY 450.00
059-395-028-000 154 GOLD VALLEY WAY 450.00
059-395-030-000 158 GOLD VALLEY WAY 450.00
059-395-031-000 162 GOLD VALLEY WAY 450.00
059-402-001-000 199 SIENNA WAY 450.00
059-402-002-000 195 SIENNA WAY 450.00
059-402-003-000 191 SIENNA WAY 450.00
059-402-004-000 187 SIENNA WAY 450.00
059-402-005-000 183 SIENNA WAY 450.00
059-402-006-000 179 SIENNA WAY 450.00
059-402-007-000 175 SIENNA WAY 450.00
059-402-008-000 171 SIENNA WAY 450.00
059-402-009-000 167 SIENNA WAY 450.00
059-402-011-000 163 HORIZON WAY 450.00
059-402-012-000 159 HORIZON WAY 450.00
059-402-013-000 155 HORIZON WAY 450.00
059-403-001-000 178 SIENNA WAY 450.00
059-403-002-000 174 SIENNA WAY 450.00
059-403-003-000 170 SIENNA WAY 450.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 39 of 45 05/11/2026 05:11:56PM 191
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District Zone 2 - Vintage Ranch Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2026/27
APN Site Address Assessment Total
059-403-004-000 138 HORIZON WAY 450.00
059-403-005-000 131 HALLMARK LN 450.00
059-403-006-000 135 HALLMARK LN 450.00
059-404-002-000 223 SIENNA CT 450.00
059-404-003-000 219 SIENNA CT 450.00
059-404-004-000 215 SIENNA CT 450.00
059-404-005-000 211 SIENNA CT 450.00
059-404-006-000 207 SIENNA CT 450.00
059-405-001-000 216 SIENNA CT 450.00
059-405-002-000 212 SIENNA CT 450.00
059-405-003-000 208 SIENNA CT 450.00
059-405-004-000 204 SIENNA WAY 450.00
059-405-005-000 200 SIENNA WAY 450.00
059-405-006-000 196 SIENNA WAY 450.00
059-405-007-000 192 SIENNA WAY 450.00
059-405-008-000 188 SIENNA WAY 450.00
059-405-009-000 184 SIENNA WAY 450.00
059-405-010-000 31 SERENA PL 450.00
059-405-011-000 27 SERENA PL 450.00
059-405-012-000 23 SERENA PL 450.00
059-405-013-000 19 SERENA PL 450.00
059-405-014-000 15 SERENA PL 450.00
059-405-015-000 11 SERENA PL 450.00
059-405-016-000 7 SERENA PL 450.00
059-405-017-000 3 SERENA PL 450.00
059-406-001-000 2 SERENA PL 450.00
059-406-002-000 6 SERENA PL 450.00
059-406-003-000 10 SERENA PL 450.00
059-406-004-000 14 SERENA PL 450.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 40 of 45 05/11/2026 05:11:56PM 192
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District Zone 2 - Vintage Ranch Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2026/27
APN Site Address Assessment Total
059-406-005-000 18 SERENA PL 450.00
059-406-006-000 22 SERENA PL 450.00
059-406-007-000 26 SERENA PL 450.00
059-406-008-000 19 SAGEBRUSH CT 450.00
059-406-009-000 15 SAGEBRUSH CT 450.00
059-406-010-000 11 SAGEBRUSH CT 450.00
059-406-011-000 7 SAGEBRUSH CT 450.00
059-406-012-000 3 SAGEBRUSH CT 450.00
059-411-001-000 22 TUSCAN OAK TRL 450.00
059-411-002-000 18 TUSCAN OAK TRL 450.00
059-411-003-000 14 TUSCAN OAK TRL 450.00
059-411-004-000 10 TUSCAN OAK TRL 450.00
059-411-005-000 6 TUSCAN OAK TRL 450.00
059-411-006-000 2 TUSCAN OAK TRL 450.00
059-411-007-000 206 SONOMA CREEK WAY 450.00
059-411-008-000 202 SONOMA CREEK WAY 450.00
059-411-009-000 198 SONOMA CREEK WAY 450.00
059-411-010-000 194 SONOMA CREEK WAY 450.00
059-411-011-000 190 SONOMA CREEK WAY 450.00
059-411-012-000 186 SONOMA CREEK WAY 450.00
059-411-013-000 182 SONOMA CREEK WAY 450.00
059-411-014-000 178 SONOMA CREEK WAY 450.00
059-411-015-000 174 SONOMA CREEK WAY 450.00
059-411-016-000 170 SONOMA CREEK WAY 450.00
059-411-017-000 166 SONOMA CREEK WAY 450.00
059-411-018-000 162 SONOMA CREEK WAY 450.00
059-411-019-000 158 SONOMA CREEK WAY 450.00
059-411-020-000 154 SONOMA CREEK WAY 450.00
059-411-021-000 150 SONOMA CREEK WAY 450.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 41 of 45 05/11/2026 05:11:56PM 193
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District Zone 2 - Vintage Ranch Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2026/27
APN Site Address Assessment Total
059-413-001-000 183 SONOMA CREEK WAY 450.00
059-413-002-000 179 SONOMA CREEK WAY 450.00
059-413-003-000 175 SONOMA CREEK WAY 450.00
059-413-004-000 171 SONOMA CREEK WAY 450.00
059-413-005-000 167 SONOMA CREEK WAY 450.00
059-413-006-000 163 SONOMA CREEK WAY 450.00
059-413-007-000 159 SONOMA CREEK WAY 450.00
059-413-008-000 155 SONOMA CREEK WAY 450.00
059-413-009-000 151 SONOMA CREEK WAY 450.00
059-413-010-000 147 SONOMA CREEK WAY 450.00
059-413-011-000 143 SONOMA CREEK WAY 450.00
059-413-012-000 139 SONOMA CREEK WAY 450.00
059-413-013-000 135 SONOMA CREEK WAY 450.00
059-413-014-000 131 SONOMA CREEK WAY 450.00
059-413-015-000 127 SONOMA CREEK WAY 450.00
059-413-016-000 123 SONOMA CREEK WAY 450.00
059-413-017-000 119 SONOMA CREEK WAY 450.00
059-413-018-000 115 SONOMA CREEK WAY 450.00
059-413-019-000 111 SONOMA CREEK WAY 450.00
059-413-020-000 107 SONOMA CREEK WAY 450.00
059-413-021-000 103 SONOMA CREEK WAY 450.00
059-413-022-000 102 HEARTHSTONE DR 450.00
059-413-023-000 106 HEARTHSTONE DR 450.00
059-413-024-000 110 HEARTHSTONE DR 450.00
059-413-025-000 114 HEARTHSTONE DR 450.00
059-413-026-000 118 HEARTHSTONE DR 450.00
059-413-027-000 122 HEARTHSTONE DR 450.00
059-413-028-000 126 HEARTHSTONE DR 450.00
059-413-029-000 130 HEARTHSTONE DR 450.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 42 of 45 05/11/2026 05:11:56PM 194
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District Zone 2 - Vintage Ranch Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2026/27
APN Site Address Assessment Total
059-413-030-000 134 HEARTHSTONE DR 450.00
059-413-031-000 138 HEARTHSTONE DR 450.00
059-413-032-000 142 HEARTHSTONE DR 450.00
059-413-033-000 146 HEARTHSTONE DR 450.00
059-413-034-000 150 HEARTHSTONE DR 450.00
059-413-035-000 154 HEARTHSTONE DR 450.00
059-413-036-000 158 HEARTHSTONE DR 450.00
059-413-037-000 162 HEARTHSTONE DR 450.00
059-413-038-000 166 HEARTHSTONE DR 450.00
059-413-039-000 170 HEARTHSTONE DR 450.00
059-413-040-000 174 HEARTHSTONE DR 450.00
059-413-041-000 178 HEARTHSTONE DR 450.00
059-413-042-000 182 HEARTHSTONE DR 450.00
059-414-002-000 211 HEARTHSTONE DR 450.00
059-414-003-000 207 HEARTHSTONE DR 450.00
059-414-004-000 203 HEARTHSTONE DR 450.00
059-414-005-000 199 HEARTHSTONE DR 450.00
059-414-006-000 195 HEARTHSTONE DR 450.00
059-414-007-000 191 HEARTHSTONE DR 450.00
059-414-008-000 187 HEARTHSTONE DR 450.00
059-414-009-000 183 HEARTHSTONE DR 450.00
059-414-010-000 179 HEARTHSTONE DR 450.00
059-414-011-000 175 HEARTHSTONE DR 450.00
059-414-012-000 171 HEARTHSTONE DR 450.00
059-414-013-000 167 HEARTHSTONE DR 450.00
059-414-014-000 163 HEARTHSTONE DR 450.00
059-414-015-000 159 HEARTHSTONE DR 450.00
059-414-016-000 155 HEARTHSTONE DR 450.00
059-414-017-000 151 HEARTHSTONE DR 450.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 43 of 45 05/11/2026 05:11:56PM 195
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District Zone 2 - Vintage Ranch Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2026/27
APN Site Address Assessment Total
059-414-018-000 147 HEARTHSTONE DR 450.00
059-414-019-000 143 HEARTHSTONE DR 450.00
059-414-020-000 139 HEARTHSTONE DR 450.00
059-414-021-000 135 HEARTHSTONE DR 450.00
059-414-022-000 131 HEARTHSTONE DR 450.00
059-414-023-000 127 HEARTHSTONE DR 450.00
059-414-024-000 123 HEARTHSTONE DR 450.00
059-414-025-000 119 HEARTHSTONE DR 450.00
059-414-026-000 115 HEARTHSTONE DR 450.00
059-414-027-000 111 HEARTHSTONE DR 450.00
059-414-028-000 107 HEARTHSTONE DR 450.00
059-414-029-000 103 HEARTHSTONE DR 450.00
766 Accounts $387,180.00
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 44 of 45 05/11/2026 05:11:56PM 196
City of American Canyon
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District Zone 3 - Napa Junction Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2026/27
APN Site Address Assessment Total
059-020-047-000 406 NAPA JUNCTION RD $2,238.34
059-020-048-000 408 NAPA JUNCTION RD 1,505.30
059-020-049-000 410 NAPA JUNCTION RD 2,301.92
059-020-050-000 800 RELIANT WAY 40,042.86
059-020-051-000 418 NAPA JUNCTION RD 6,108.98
059-020-052-000 416 NAPA JUNCTION RD 1,604.28
059-351-010-000 7011 MAIN ST 41,493.66
059-351-012-000 5500 EUCALYPTUS DR 58,933.52
059-351-013-000 401 NAPA JUNCTION RD 1,499.38
059-351-014-000 7021 MAIN ST 1,942.38
059-351-015-000 6055 MAIN ST 1,684.64
059-351-016-000 6040 MAIN ST 3,333.60
059-352-001-000 5055 MAIN ST 5,650.44
059-352-002-000 5001 MAIN ST 11,301.62
14 Accounts $179,640.92
$818,460.92 1,246 Total Accounts
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 45 of 45 05/11/2026 05:11:56PM 197

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
JUNE 2, 2026

STAFF REPORT

BUSINESS
ITEM NUMBER: 16.

TITLE
Potential Revenue Measure: Draft Ballot Language

RECOMMENDATION
Review and provide direction on the updated draft ballot language.

CONTACT
Jason Holley, City Manager

BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS
Updated Draft Ballot Language
Based on feedback from the polling results and City Council on May 5, staff recommends the following updated ballot language for a one percent (1.0% or one cent) general sales tax measure.

The recommended language reflects voter priori:es, including public safety, neighborhood concerns, parks and recrea:on, and quality of life services. The proposed measure is es:mated to generate approximately $3.7 million annually to support general governmental services and maintain community priorities.

Revised ballot language:

American Canyon Public Safety, Parks, City Services Measure. Shall an ordinance funding American Canyon's general City services, such as maintaining 911 response/neighborhood police patrols; preven3ng crime; reducing wildfire risk by managing brush/other flammable vegeta3on; addressing speeding/unsafe driving; keeping public areas/parks safe/clean; maintaining and expanding safe places for children to play; maintaining parks, trails, youth/adult recrea3on, senior programming, among others; by establishing a 1% sales tax, providing approximately $3,700,000 annually un3l ended by voters, requiring audits, spending disclosure, funds locally controlled, be adopted?
Next Steps
This item is intended to provide the Council with informa:on and to receive direc:on regarding poten:al next steps. The deadline for Council to place a revenue measure on the November 2026 Ballot isJune 16. Should Council support the recommended updated dra? ballot language and desire to con:nue moving forward with this measure, staff will bring the item back for Council 198
consideration at the June 16, 2026, meeting for potential placement on the November 2026 ballot.

In addi:on, staff will con:nue coordina:ng with Tripepi Smith & Associates to implement neutral public outreach and education efforts, as outlined in Attachment 2.

May 5 City Council Staff Report
The city retained the statewide polling firm Fairbank, Maslin, Maulin, Metz & Associates (FM3 Research) to conduct sta:s:cally valid voter opinion research regarding voter support for a sales tax measure and priorities for City services.

FM3 compiled a random sample of voters from American Canyon's local voter file. A total of 267 voters completed the poll. The sample did not include minors or adults who are not registered to vote. The demographic and geographical characteris:cs of survey respondents were carefully monitored during the data collec:on phase to ensure the final sample profile reflected the voters in American Canyon. Consequently, not all adults or voters were invited to par:cipate in the survey.

The margin of sampling error was +/- 6.2% at a 95% confidence level.

On May 5, 2026, the City Council received a presenta:on regarding the polling results (AHachment 1), including voter support levels for a poten:al sales tax measure, community priori:es for maintaining and expanding City services, and tes:ng of poten:al ballot language. Council also discussed dis:nc:ons between general and special taxes, voter approval thresholds, and poten:al next steps associated with a future ballot measure.

The polling efforts tested voter support for a general sales tax measure, including both a one percent (1.0% or one cent) and one-half percent (0.5% or one-half cent) op:ons. Tax increases require voter approval, FM3 tested the following draft ballot language:

American Canyon Public Safety, Parks, City Services Measure. Shall an ordinance funding City of American Canyon’s general services, such as maintaining 911 response; preven ng crime; adding
well-trained police officers; keeping public areas/parks safe/clean; protec ng wetlands, natural
areas; keeping trash out of local creeks; maintaining parks, trails, youth/adult recrea on, senior
programs, among others; by establishing a 1% sales tax, providing approximately $3,700,000 annually un
l ended by voters, requiring audits, spending disclosure, funds locally controlled, be adopted?

COUNCIL PRIORITY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS
Organizational Effectiveness: "Deliver exemplary government services."

FISCAL IMPACT
The cost for FM3 and Tripeppi-Smith are included in the FY 25-26 Budget. The cost for the November 2026 election will be included in next year's budget. 199
Staff es:mates a one percent (1%) sales tax would generate approximately $3.7M per year in new revenue. Over a 30-year :me period this revenue could service approximately $62M in new debt (given current municipal bond rates of 4.25%). A one-half percent (0.5%) sales tax could generate half of this amount - or approximately $31M.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
15378(b) - The ac:on is not a "Project" subject to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") because it does not qualify as a "Project" under Public Resources Code Sec:ons 21065 and 21080 and in Section 15378(b) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.

COMMUNICATION
Level 4: Robust Communication & Engagement
Staff has conducted outreach to City commissions and local media to provide awareness of this item. The agenda, staff report, and associated materials also serve as a form of communica:on to inform the public of the City’s evaluation of a potential sales tax measure.

Should the City Council provide direc:on to proceed with a sales tax measure for this general elec:on, addi:onal outreach and educa:on efforts will be conducted in accordance with the aHached communica:ons plan. The plan provides a high-level approach and maybe refined to accommodate additional ideas, consistent with the approved budget.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Polling Results Presentation

2. Draft Outreach and Education Communications Plan
200
220-7888
City of American Canyon
Budget Priority 2026 Survey
201
2 Dates April 5-16, 2026
Survey Type Dual-mode Voter Survey
Research Population Likely November 2026 Voters in the City of American Canyon Total Interviews 267
Margin of Sampling Error (Full Sample) ±6.2% at the 95% Confidence Level (Half Sample) ±8.8% at the 95% Confidence Level
Contact Methods
Data Collection Modes
Languages English and Spanish
Survey Methodology
(Note: Not All Results Will Sum to 100% Due to Rounding) Text
Invitations
Telephone
Calls
Email
Invitations
Telephone
Interviews
Online
Interviews
202
3 The Mood of the Electorate
203
4 Q.

Right
Direction
50%
Wrong
Track
34%
Don't
Know
17%
Half of voters are optimistic about the City’s direction.

First, thinking about the City of American Canyon in general, would you say things are going in the right direction, or do you feel they are off on the wrong track? 204
5 Nearly two-thirds believe the City needs at least some additional funds, with a modest one-in-five saying there is a great need.

Q. In your personal opinion, do you think the City of American Canyon has a great need for additional funding, some need, a little need, or no real need for additional funds to provide the level of city services that American Canyon residents need and want?
21%
44%
9%
17%
10%
Great need
Some need
A little need
No real need
Don't know
A Little/
No Real Need
26%
Great/
Some Need
64%
205
6 Initial Attitudes on a Potential
1% Sales Tax Measure
206
7 Hypothetical Ballot Measure Tested in the Survey
Q. If there were an election today, do you think you would vote yes or no on this measure? (As Approved by Legal Counsel)
American Canyon Public Safety, Parks, City Services Measure.

Shall an ordinance funding City of American Canyon’s general services, such as maintaining 911 response; preventing crime; adding well-trained police officers; keeping public areas/parks safe/clean; protecting wetlands, natural areas; keeping trash out of local creeks; maintaining parks, trails, youth/adult recreation, senior programs, among others; by establishing a 1% sales tax, providing approximately $3,700,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring audits, spending disclosure, funds locally controlled, be adopted?
207
8 30%
20%
5%
1%
6%
31%
6%
Definitely yes
Probably yes
Undecided, lean yes
Undecided, lean no
Probably no
Definitely no
Undecided
Total
Yes
55%
Q. If there were an election today, do you think you would vote yes or no on this measure? 50%
Total
No
38%
Support is slightly over the simple majority threshold required for passage in the initial vote, although a modest
three-in-ten would “definitely” vote yes.
(MOE: ±6.2%)
208
9 64%
46%
29%
49%
7% 5%
East of Highway 29 West of Highway 29
Total Yes Total No Undecided
(% of Sample) (52%) (48%)
Voters living east of Highway 29 strongly support the measure, while voters west of Highway 29 are split.

Q. If there were an election today, do you think you would vote yes or no on this measure? Initial Vote on American Canyon Public Safety, Parks, City Services Measure by East/West of Highway 29 209
10 65%
29% 28%
71%
6%
1%
Great/Some Need A Little/No Real Need
Total Yes Total No Undecided
(% of Sample) (64%) (26%)
Perceived need for additional funding is
strongly linked to support for the measure.

Q. If there were an election today, do you think you would vote yes or no on this measure? Initial Vote on American Canyon Public Safety, Parks, City Services Measure by Funding Need 210
11 Budget Priorities
211
12 58%
67%
47%
55%
47%
47%
35%
50%
33%
33%
20%
36%
28%
34%
33%
44%
28%
45%
8%
12%
14%
16%
15%
15%
16%
16%
15%
4%
4%
4%
6%
6%
^Maintaining 911 response
Preventing crime
^Maintaining safe places for children to play
Helping prevent property crimes and burglaries
^Maintaining neighborhood police protection
^Addressing speeding and unsafe driving
Keeping American Canyon’s recreation and park
facilities clean, safe and well-maintained
Reducing wildfire risk by managing brush and other
flammable vegetation
^Maintaining parks
Extremely Important Very Important Somewhat Important Not Too Important Don't Know Extremely/Very Important
91%
87%
83%
82%
81%
80%
80%
78%
78%
Q. Next, please consider some potential elements of the ballot measure you just considered, including ways in which the funds it generates could be spent, and provisions that could be included. Regardless of your opinion of the measure, for each one, please indicate how important each one is to you personally: either extremely important, very important, somewhat important, or not too important. ^Not Part of Split Sample (Ranked by Extremely/Very Important)
Maintaining 911 response, preventing crime, maintaining safe places for children to play, maintaining neighborhood police protection and addressing speeding and unsafe driving are among voters’ top funding measure priorities. 212
13 39%
38%
45%
41%
36%
32%
46%
37%
38%
38%
29%
34%
38%
42%
27%
34%
18%
16%
20%
21%
21%
20%
19%
22%
5%
7%
5%
4%
4%
6%
7%
7%
Maintaining city services
Maintaining community service officers and patrols
Keeping public areas and parks safe and clean
Reducing wildfire risk by managing brush
and other fuels
^Keeping trash out of local creeks
^Protecting natural areas
^Adding well-trained police officers
Protecting open space
Extremely Important Very Important Somewhat Important Not Too Important Don't Know Extremely/Very Important
77%
76%
75%
75%
74%
74%
73%
71%
Q. Next, please consider some potential elements of the ballot measure you just considered, including ways in which the funds it generates could be spent, and provisions that could be included. Regardless of your opinion of the measure, for each one, please indicate how important each one is to you personally: either extremely important, very important, somewhat important, or not too important. ^Not Part of Split Sample (Ranked by Extremely/Very Important)
Continued
213
14 38%
25%
37%
30%
31%
28%
31%
26%
23%
32%
45%
28%
35%
32%
36%
33%
36%
39%
22%
22%
23%
22%
30%
27%
30%
22%
27%
7%
6%
9%
10%
6%
6%
7%
12%
11%
4%
4%
^Protecting wetlands
Maintaining school resource officers
^Protecting native species and wildlife habitats
^Improving access for people with disabilities
in city parks
Maintaining open space
Improving city services
Maintaining youth and adult recreation programs
^Requiring a citizens’ oversight committee
Repairing and upgrading parks, playgrounds,
and sports fields
Extremely Important Very Important Somewhat Important Not Too Important Don't Know Q. Next, please consider some potential elements of the ballot measure you just considered, including ways in which the funds it generates could be spent, and provisions that could be included. Regardless of your opinion of the measure, for each one, please indicate how important each one is to you personally: either extremely important, very important, somewhat important, or not too important. ^Not Part of Split Sample (Ranked by Extremely/Very Important)
Continued
Extremely/Very
Important
70%
70%
66%
65%
64%
64%
63%
62%
62%
214
15 28%
26%
28%
20%
21%
19%
11%
32%
34%
30%
34%
29%
21%
22%
25%
35%
32%
30%
37%
33%
32%
12%
4%
9%
16%
13%
26%
34%
Expanding senior programs 4%
Maintaining senior programs
^Maintaining trails
Repairing and upgrading community centers
Increasing youth and adult recreation programs
Establishing a multipurpose community center
and gym
Expanding football, baseball and soccer fields
Extremely Important Very Important Somewhat Important Not Too Important Don't Know Extremely/Very Important
60%
60%
58%
54%
50%
39%
32%
Q. Next, please consider some potential elements of the ballot measure you just considered, including ways in which the funds it generates could be spent, and provisions that could be included. Regardless of your opinion of the measure, for each one, please indicate how important each one is to you personally: either extremely important, very important, somewhat important, or not too important. ^Not Part of Split Sample (Ranked by Extremely/Very Important)
Continued
215
16 Effect of Educational and
Critical Statements
216
17 The measure’s strict accountability provisions, continuing to invest in crime reduction, and maintaining services to protect the quality of life are among the leading reasons to support the measure.

Q. Now please consider the (PHONE: following statements) (ONLINE: statements on the next few screens) from people who may support the potential measure you have been considering. For each statement, please indicate if it makes you much more inclined or somewhat more inclined to vote Yes on the measure. *Split Sample (Ranked by Total More Inclined to Vote Yes)
(ACCOUNTABILITY) This measure includes strict accountability requirements such as public disclosure of all spending and annual independent financial audits that ensure funds are used effectively and efficiently, and cannot be taken by the county, state or federal government so they can only be used to benefit the American Canyon community.
(CRIME) With more crime fighting tools available, our proactive police department made one-third more arrests last year. Most of these crimes are committed by individuals who come from other cities to target our community, including organized retail theft and car burglaries. The funds from this measure could help the City continue to reduce crime by investing in more neighborhood policing to keep local residents, businesses, and their property safe. *(PROPERTY VALUES) Safe and clean public spaces, parks and neighborhoods, and well-maintained neighborhood parks are investments that strengthen local property values and make our community a more desirable place to live, do business and raise a family.
36%
35%
21%
29%
29%
42%
64%
64%
63%
Much More Inclined Somewhat More Inclined
217
18 27%
35%
33%
26%
33%
25%
28%
32%
61%
60%
60%
58%
Much More Inclined Somewhat More Inclined
Q. Now please consider the (PHONE: following statements) (ONLINE: statements on the next few screens) from people who may support the potential measure you have been considering. For each statement, please indicate if it makes you much more inclined or somewhat more inclined to vote Yes on the measure. *Split Sample (Ranked by Total More Inclined to Vote Yes)
*(PATROLS) The City of American Canyon has only on average about five to six officers on patrol at any given time. The funds from this measure could help increase the number of patrols and improve 911 emergency response services to keep local residents and their property safe.
*(QUALITY OF LIFE) Safe neighborhoods and parks, quality programs for children, youth, and seniors all contribute to a strong quality of life. If passed, this measure could provide the funding needed to maintain these city services, ensuring American Canyon remains a great place to live, do business, and raise a family. *(CRIME CLEARANCE) American Canyon’s Police Department solves crimes at a higher rate than both the California and national averages. Adding well-trained police officers will help ensure our police department has the staffing needed to keep response times low, solve crimes, and continue providing the high level of safety our community relies on.
(MAINTAIN PARKS) Our city's 20 parks, trails, and recreation centers are a source of community pride, but they need investment to stay that way. This measure could provide dedicated funding to maintain and upgrade our sports fields, repair aging infrastructure, and upgrade children’s playgrounds so kids have safe places to play.

Our community deserves fields and facilities that are safe, functional, and well-maintained.

Continued
218
19 32%
30%
26%
25%
27%
32%
57%
57%
57%
Much More Inclined Somewhat More Inclined
Q. Now please consider the (PHONE: following statements) (ONLINE: statements on the next few screens) from people who may support the potential measure you have been considering. For each statement, please indicate if it makes you much more inclined or somewhat more inclined to vote Yes on the measure. Not Part of Split Sample (Ranked by Total More Inclined to Vote Yes)
(KIDS/HEALTH) In today's digital age, it is more important than ever to preserve opportunities for children to swim, play, create, and experience the outdoors.

This measure could provide funding to maintain and expand afterschool park, recreation, aquatics, and arts programs as well as summer camps that more than 2,500 young people rely on. Additional funding will help ensure kids have time away from screens and access to activities that improve their overall physical health and well-being.
(OUT OF TOWNERS) About 45% of the funding from this measure will be paid by visitors and commuters from outside the city who work in or pass through American Canyon, and shop at Walmart, Safeway and other local retailers. This is an opportunity for people who do not live in our city to contribute their fair share to keep our community safe while they are here.
(FUTURE GROWTH) With our community continuing to grow, it’s critical that our city services grow with it. Investing now will help maintain strong police protection; keep neighborhoods safe; expand youth, adult and senior recreation programs and ensure American Canyon is prepared for the future.

Continued
219
20 Q. Now please consider the (PHONE: following statements) (ONLINE: statements on the next few screens) from people who may support the potential measure you have been considering. For each statement, please indicate if it makes you much more inclined or somewhat more inclined to vote Yes on the measure. *Split Sample 36%
35%
21%
27%
35%
33%
26%
32%
30%
26%
29%
29%
42%
33%
25%
28%
32%
25%
27%
32%
64%
64%
63%
61%
60%
60%
58%
57%
57%
57%
Accountability
Crime
*Property Values
*Patrols
*Quality of Life
*Crime Clearance
Maintain Parks
Kids/Health
Out of Towners
Future Growth
Much More Inclined Somewhat More Inclined
Summary of Educational Statements
(Ranked by Total More Inclined to Vote Yes)
220
21 36%
17%
5%
3%
3%
27%
7%
Q. If there were an election today, do you think you would vote yes or no on this measure? Initial Vote Vote After Education
30%
20%
5%
1%
6%
31%
6%
Definitely yes
Probably yes
Undecided, lean yes
Undecided, lean no
Probably no
Definitely no
Undecided
Total
Yes
55%
Total
Yes
59%
50% 53%
Total
No
38%
Total
No
33%
After education, overall support increases four percentages points, with slightly more than one-third definitely voting yes. (MOE: ±6.2%)
221
22 Critical Statements
The cost of living, including groceries, gas and housing, is way too high, and many of us are struggling to make ends meet and keep up with rising taxes every year, including a recent $230 million local school bond measure and increases in our water rates.

Now is not the time for another expensive tax increase.

Further, nothing in this ballot measure requires the money to be used for public safety services, parks or any of the other programs mentioned in the description. It is just a blank check with no end date, which politicians can use to fund pet projects like luxury city buildings. With over $11 million in a reserve fund, the City has plenty of money for the services mentioned in this measure and should tighten its belt like the rest of us instead of asking for more. Opponents also note that many residents already pay a special assessment for park maintenance — before asking taxpayers to pay more, the City should show that the funds we are already paying are being used effectively and making real improvements in our parks.

Key Critical Arguments:

1. Cost of Living/Rising Taxes

2. Blank Check

3. Have the Money/
Cut Waste & Inefficiency

4. Some Already Paying a
Parks Special Assessment/
City Should Show How the
Money is Spent
222
23 30%
20%
5%
1%
6%
31%
6%
Definitely yes
Probably yes
Undecided, lean yes
Undecided, lean no
Probably no
Definitely no
Undecided
Total
Yes
55%
50%
Initial Vote Vote After
Critical Statements Vote After Education
Q If there were an election today, do you think you would vote yes or no on this measure? Total
No
38%
36%
17%
5%
3%
3%
27%
7%
29%
15%
5%
2%
7%
31%
10%
Critical statements undermine support, with support declining nine points and below its initial levels; just 3-in-10 would definitely vote yes in this final query. (MOE: ±6.2%)
Total
Yes
59%
Total
Yes
50%
53% 44%
Total
No
33%
Total
No
40%
223
24 34%
17%
4%
6%
6%
26%
7%
Q. If there were an election today, do you think you would vote yes or no on this measure? Q. What if instead of a 1% sales tax which generates approximately $3,700,000 annually, the measure you have been considering were for a ½%, which would generate approximately $1,850,000 annually with the funding used for the same general city services previously mentioned. If that were the case, would you vote yes or no on this measure? Vote on 1% After Critical Statements Vote on ½%
29%
15%
5%
2%
7%
31%
10%
Definitely yes
Probably yes
Undecided, lean yes
Undecided, lean no
Probably no
Definitely no
Undecided
Total
Yes
50%
Total
Yes
55%
44% 51%
Total
No
40%
Total
No
38%
Support bounces back to 55% if the sales tax drops from 1% to a ½%, though those saying they would definitely vote yes remains somewhat modest.
(MOE: ±6.2%)
224
25 Hypothetical Sales Tax Measure
in Context of a Countywide
Measure
225
26 Napa County Sales Tax Ballot Measure
Q. If there were an election today, do you think you would vote yes in favor of this measure or no to oppose it? The Napa County Wildfire Preparedness, Watershed Protection and Open Space Preservation Act. To reduce the risk of catastrophic wildfires; remove dry brush, dead trees, and fire hazards; establish firebreaks and fire-safe evacuation routes for residents and first responders; preserve natural open spaces, and protect water quality/supplies and land around lakes, rivers, and streams; shall Napa County’s one-half cent sales tax measure be adopted, providing $23,000,000 annually for 18 years, with oversight, annual audits and local control? 226
27 29%
17%
4%
3%
12%
24%
11%
Definitely yes
Probably yes
Undecided, lean yes
Undecided, lean no
Probably no
Definitely no
Undecided
Total
Yes
50%
Q. If there were an election today, do you think you would vote yes in favor of this measure or no to oppose it? 46%
Total
No
40%
Knowing the City and the County measure may be on the same ballot, 50% would vote yes on the County measure; however, slightly less than three-in-ten would definitely vote yes. (MOE: ±6.2%)
• Reducing wildfire risk
by managing brush and
other flammable
vegetation (78%
ext/very important)
• Reducing wildfire risk
by managing brush and
other fuels (75%
ext/very important)
227
28 When directly asked how they would vote if both the City and County measures were on the same ballot, approximately 42% would vote yes on the City measure and 36% on
the County measure, with 19% undecided.

Q (Combined). If the 1% sales tax entitled the American Canyon Public Safety, Parks, City Services Measure and the ½-cent sales tax entitled The Napa County Wildfire Preparedness, Watershed Protection and Open Space Preservation Act were on the ballot at the same time, would you vote yes on both these measures, yes on just one of the measures, or no on both measures?/Which would you vote “yes” on: the American Canyon Public Safety, Parks, City Services Measure or The Napa County Wildfire Preparedness, Watershed Protection and Open Space Preservation Act? 12%
30%
6%
32%
19%
Yes on the American Canyon Public Safety, Parks,
City Services Measure
Yes on both measures
Yes on The Napa County Wildfire Preparedness,
Watershed Protection and Open Space Preservation Act
No on both measures
Undecided
Total Yes
City Measure
42%
Total Yes
County Measure
36%
(MOE: ±6.2%)
228
29 Conclusions
229
30 Conclusions
Context:
▪ One-in-two have a positive view of the direction of the City. ▪ More than 6-in-10 perceive the City has a need for additional funds, with only about 1-in-5 indicating great need.
1% City Sales Tax:
▪ Initially, overall support is 55%, with 30% having said they would definitely vote yes and 31% who said they would definitely vote no. ▪ After education, support rises to 59%, above the simple majority threshold and above the margin of error.
▪ After critical statements support drops to 50% — just at the threshold of passage and within the margin of error — with 29% having said they would definitely vote yes and 31% having said they would vote no. 230
31 Conclusions; Continued
1% vs ½% City Sales Tax:
▪ Lowering the sales tax from 1% to ½% increases support to 55%, above the simple majority threshold, but within the margin of error of passage.

Countywide 1/2-cent Sales Tax:
▪ Only 1-in-2 American Canyon likely November 2026 voters indicated they would vote yes, with only 3-in-10 willing to definitely vote yes. ▪ Assuming both measures would appear on the ballot, neither measure received the simple majority vote (City Measure 42% and County Measure 36%) needed for passage, though 19% are undecided as to how they would vote on each measure at the time of the survey.
231
220-7888
City of American Canyon
Budget Priority 2026 Survey
232
City of American Canyon
Project Schedule + Timeline

PROPOSAL
May 2026 May 5: Presentation to Council about Results from survey and community outreach
Talking Points: budget education
Webpage Content: budget education
FM3 Collaboration
Confirm FB disclosure for boosting political ads
Blurb for newsletters: community meeting
Informational Mailer #1: Postcard for virtual community meeting/budget info
Social media: virtual town halls
Run of show for virtual town hall
Presentation for virtual town hall
Approach the AmCan Chamber of Commerce on
Supporting a Possible Measure
Jun. 2026 June 2: PR on FY 26/27 Budget adoption
Virtual Town Hall #1 on Budget 101, possible measure
[early June]
June 10 - Booth at Meet Me In the Streets event
June 16 - Council possibly adopt resolution
PR on ballot measure adoption
Social Media: ballot measure info directing to webpage
Webpage update: ballot measure
Talking Points: ballot measure
Blurb for newsletters: measure adoption
Jul. 2026
PR on Council endorsing the ballot measure [tentative]
PR on ballot measure community meeting
Social Media: ballot measure community meeting
PR on FY 2026-27 Budget Adoption
233
Presentation/run of show for community workshop
meetings
Jul. 6: Submit Measure language in a resolution
requesting consolidation.

July 8: Booth at Meet Me In The Streets event
Aug. 2026 Blurb for newsletters: community meeting
Informational Mailer #1: Postcard invitation to community meetings
Social media posts on ballot measure info directing to
webpage
Social media posts on ballot measure info directing to
webpage
Social media posts on ballot measure community
meeting
Track on ballot measure arguments, adjust messaging as
needed
Aug 7: Clerk of Board and County Counsel present
consolidation to Board
Aug 12: Booth at Meet Me In The Streets event
Virtual community meeting #1 on ballot measure
Social Media: post for people to watch recorded
community meeting
Sep. 2026 Blurb for Newsletters: ballot measure education Animated Video: Sales Tax Measure Education (boosted)
Run Digital placements on ballot measure education
Virtual community Meeting #2 on ballot measure
Aug 25-Sept 3: Public Examination Period for Rebuttals
Sept 9: Booth at Meet Me In The Streets event
PR GFOA Award for Budget Book - Fall 2026
Oct. 2026 Informational Mailer #2: on measure
Oct 5: Mailing of Vote-By-Mail Ballots
Cease comms 2 weeks prior to election
Nov. 2026 Nov 3: Election Day
234

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
JUNE 2, 2026

STAFF REPORT

BUSINESS
ITEM NUMBER: 17.

TITLE
Initiative Petition Measure M

RECOMMENDATION
Consider Ini$a$ve Pe$$on Measure M and provide direc$on pursuant to California Elec$ons Code sections 9212 and 9215 regarding whether to:

Option 1 - Adopt the proposed ordinance without alteration: Adopt a Resolution adopting, without altera$on, the proposed ordinance submi2ed by ini$a$ve pe$$on known as Measure M pursuant to California Elections Code 9215(a); or
Op#on 2 - Submit the proposed ordinance to the voters : Adopt a Resolu$on submi8ng the proposed ini$a$ve ordinance known as Measure M to the voters at the November 3, 2026, General Municipal Elec$on Consolidated with Napa County Pursuant to California Elec$ons Code Sec$on 9215(b); or
Op#on 3 - Direct staff to prepare a report pursuant to Elec#ons Code Sec#on 9212: Adopt a Resolu$on ordering the prepara$on of a report pursuant to California Elec$ons Code sec$on 9212 regarding the proposed initiative ordinance known as Measure M.

CONTACT
Taresa Geilfuss, CMC, City Clerk

BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS
On the Consent Calendar of this same agenda, City Council accepted the cer$fica$on of the Napa County Registrar of Voters that ini$a$ve pe$$on Measure M, en$tled: “Ini$a$ve Measure to Amend American Canyon 2040 General Plan Mobility Element to Add Watson Lane Extension and Newell Drive Extension to the General Plan Roadway Network," contains a sufficient number of valid signatures to qualify for further consideration under the California Elections Code.

Following certification of petition sufficiency, California Elections Code section 9215 requires the City Council to take one of the following actions with respect to the proposed initiative ordinance.

Option 1 – Adopt the Ordinance Without Alteration
235
Pursuant to Elec$ons Code sec$on 9215(a), the City Council may adopt the proposed ordinance, without altera$on. If the City Council adopts the ordinance outright, the measure becomes law without submission to the voters, subject to any applicable effective dates and legal requirements.

Option 2 – Submit the Measure to the Voters
Pursuant to Elec$ons Code sec$on 9215(b), the City Council may submit the proposed ordinance to the voters at a future elec$on. If the Council chooses this op$on, addi$onal elec$on-related ac$ons would be required at a later date, including establishing deadlines and procedures for ballot arguments and impartial analysis; and authorizing related election administration activities.

Unless otherwise required by law, the measure would generally be submi2ed to the voters at the next regular municipal election.

Option 3 – Direct Preparation of a Report Pursuant to Elections Code Section 9212 Prior to taking final ac$on under Elec$ons Code sec$on 9215, the City Council may direct staff to prepare a report pursuant to Elec$ons Code sec$on 9212. Sec$on 9212 authorizes the City Council to request a report evalua$ng the poten$al impacts of the proposed ini$a$ve measure. The report may address topics including, but not limited to:

Fiscal impacts;
Land use and planning impacts;
Traffic and circulation impacts;
Infrastructure and public service impacts;
Environmental considerations;
Consistency with the General Plan and existing City policies; and Other matters requested by the City Council.

If the City Council directs prepara$on of a Sec$on 9212 report, the report must be presented to the Council within 30 days.

Following receipt of the report, the City Council would then proceed under Elec$ons Code sec$on 9215 to either:

Adopt the initiative ordinance without alteration; or
Submit the measure to the voters.

Council Direction
At this mee$ng, staff is reques$ng that City Council provide direc$on regarding how it wishes to proceed under the California Elec$ons Code. Depending on the ac$on selected by the City Council, the appropriate implementing resolution will be presented for consideration.

COUNCIL PRIORITY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS
Organizational Effectiveness: "Deliver exemplary government services." 236

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no immediate fiscal impact associated with receiving this report and considering the procedural options available under the California Elections Code.

Poten$al future fiscal impacts would depend on the ac$on selected by the City Council. Prepara$on of a report pursuant to Elec$ons Code sec$on 9212 requires staff $me, consultant support and legal counsel. Estimated expense is TBD.

Submission of the measure to the voters would result in addi$onal elec$on-related costs of approximately $20,000 including ballot prepara$on, publica$on, transla$on, and county elec$on administration expenses.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
15378(b) - The ac$on is not a "Project" subject to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") because it does not qualify as a "Project" under Public Resources Code Sec$ons 21065 and 21080 and in Section 15378(b) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.

COMMUNICATION
Level 0: No Further Public Communication Needed
ATTACHMENTS:

Option 1 - Resolution Adopting Ordinance as Submitted
Option 1 - Exhibit A - Initiative Petition Ordinance
Option 2 - Resolution Submitting to the Initiative to the Voters Option 2 - Exhibit A - Initiative Petition Ordinance
Option 3 - Resolution Ordering a 9212 Report
237
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON ADOPTING, WITHOUT

ALTERATION, THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE SUBMITTED BY INITIATIVE PETITION KNOWN AS MEASURE M PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA ELECTIONS CODE SECTION 9215(a)
WHEREAS, pursuant to California Elections Code section 9200 et seq., proponents submitted an initiative petition entitled:
“Initiative Measure to Amend American Canyon 2040 General Plan Mobility Element to Add Watson Lane Extension and Newell Drive Extension to the General Plan Roadway Network” (“Measure M”); and WHEREAS, the initiative petition was examined by the Napa County Registrar of Voters in accordance with applicable provisions of the California Elections Code; and WHEREAS, the Napa County Registrar of Voters certified that the initiative petition contains a sufficient number of valid signatures of registered voters of the City of American Canyon; and WHEREAS, on June 2, 2026, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2026-TBD accepting the certification of sufficiency for Measure M; and
WHEREAS, California Elections Code section 9215(a) authorizes the City Council to adopt a proposed initiative ordinance, without alteration, following certification of petition sufficiency; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the proposed initiative ordinance and desires to adopt the ordinance without alteration pursuant to Elections Code section 9215(a).

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of American Canyon as follows:

SECTION 1. Recitals.

The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference.

SECTION 2. Adoption of Initiative Ordinance.

Pursuant to California Elections Code section 9215(a), the City Council hereby adopts, without alteration, the proposed initiative ordinance submitted by initiative petition known as Measure M, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference.

SECTION 3. Effective Date.

The ordinance adopted by this Resolution shall take effect in accordance with applicable provisions of law.

SECTION 4. CEQA.

The City Council finds that adoption of this Resolution and the initiative ordinance is not a project subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, subdivision (b)(3) as the ordinance was proposed by a petition signed by the requisite number of registered voters.

SECTION 5. Severability.

If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution or the adopted initiative ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions. 238
SECTION 6. Certification.

The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of June 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON SUBMITTING THE PROPOSED INITIATIVE ORDINANCE KNOWN AS MEASURE M TO THE VOTERS AT THE NOVEMBER 3, 2026,

GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION CONSOLIDATED WITH NAPA COUNTY PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA ELECTIONS CODE SECTION 9215(b)
WHEREAS, pursuant to California Elections Code section 9200 et seq., proponents submitted an initiative petition entitled:
“Initiative Measure to Amend American Canyon 2040 General Plan Mobility Element to Add Watson Lane Extension and Newell Drive Extension to the General Plan Roadway Network” (“Measure M”); and WHEREAS, the initiative petition was examined by the Napa County Registrar of Voters in accordance with applicable provisions of the California Elections Code; and WHEREAS, the Napa County Registrar of Voters certified that the initiative petition contains a sufficient number of valid signatures of registered voters of the City of American Canyon; and WHEREAS, on June 2, 2026, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2026-___ accepting the certification of sufficiency for Measure M; and
WHEREAS, on June 2, 2026, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2026-___ calling the November 3, 2026, General Municipal Election and requesting consolidation of that election with Napa County; and WHEREAS, California Elections Code section 9215(b) authorizes the City Council to submit a proposed initiative ordinance to the voters following certification of petition sufficiency; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to submit the proposed initiative ordinance known as Measure M to the voters on the November 3, 2026, General Municipal Election consolidated with Napa County.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of American Canyon as follows:

SECTION 1. Recitals.

The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference.

SECTION 2. Submission to the Voters.

Pursuant to California Elections Code section 9215(b), the City Council hereby directs to be submitted to the voters of the City of American Canyon regarding the proposed initiative ordinance known as Measure M, the following question:

Shall the measure to amend the American Canyon 2040 General Plan Mobility Element to add Watson Lane/Marcus Road circulation connection between State Route 29 and Newell Drive be adopted?
YES
NO
252
SECTION 3. The proposed measure title and summary are as follows:
“Initiative Measure to Amend American Canyon 2040 General Plan Mobility Element to Add Watson Lane/ Marcus Road Circulation Connection Between State Route 29 and Newell Drive” Summary:

If approved by a majority of American Canyon voters, this initiative would make several amendments to the American Canyon 2040 General Plan's Mobility Element. The current Mobility Element plans for Newell Drive to connect to State Route 29 at Green Island Road in the north and via Donaldson Way in the south.

The initiative would amend the Mobility Element's SR 29 Corridor Planning to add a "Watson Lane/Marcus Road Connector" as an additional east-west and northern circulation connection to State Route 29. Watson Lane would be planned as a 2-lane east-west minor collector street connecting Newell Drive to State Route 29 via Paoli Loop Road. The initiative also proposes to connect Watson Lane to Rio Del Mar by a planned northern extension of Marcus Road. The Mobility Element would also plan for an improved at-grade public railroad crossing at Watson Lane.

The initiative would also amend the Mobility Element's Street Classifications section to add a new type of collector street, a "Minor Collector Street (Modified)," to the City's standard roadway cross sections. The initiative would reclassify previously planned roadway segments of Newell Drive from Donaldson Way to Rio Del Mar, and from Rio Del Mar to State Route 29 at Green Island Road, and on Mallen Way, from arterial or standard collector street classifications to a minor collector street (modified) classification, with a sidewalk on the west side.

The initiative would add a policy to the Mobility Element addressing improvements to Watson Lane and Marcus Road, including planning for the at-grade railroad crossing. The initiative does not fund or authorize construction of any road. Any future construction requires additional approvals by the City Council.

If this initiative is approved, the City's General Plan Mobility Element would be amended to add the new east-west connection between Newell Drive and State Route 29 at Watson Lane and the new connection between Rio Del Mar and Watson Lane by extending Marcus Road.

If this initiative is not approved, the City's General Plan Mobility Element would remain the same as it reads now, with Newell Drive planned to connect to State Route 29 at Green Island Road in the north and via Donaldson Way in the south.

The initiative prohibits the City Council from changing any of its provisions. Only the City's voters could amend the initiative's provisions.

SECTION 4. Consolidation with Napa County.

The election for Measure M shall be consolidated with the November 3, 2026, statewide election to be conducted by the Napa County Registrar of Voters pursuant to Resolution No. 2026-___ previously adopted by the City Council.

SECTION 5. Election Administration.

The Napa County Registrar of Voters is hereby authorized and requested to take all actions necessary for the conduct and administration of the election related to Measure M in accordance with applicable provisions of law. 253
SECTION 6. CEQA.

The City Council finds that adoption of this Resolution and the initiative ordinance, if approved by the City’s voters, is not a project within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, subdivision (b)(3) as the ordinance was proposed by a petition signed by the requisite number of registered voters.

SECTION 7. Certification.

The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of June 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF A REPORT PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA ELECTIONS CODE SECTION 9212 REGARDING THE PROPOSED

INITIATIVE ORDINANCE KNOWN AS MEASURE M
WHEREAS, pursuant to California Elections Code section 9200 et seq., proponents submitted an initiative petition entitled:
“Initiative Measure to Amend American Canyon 2040 General Plan Mobility Element to Add Watson Lane Extension and Newell Drive Extension to the General Plan Roadway Network” (“Measure M”); and WHEREAS, the initiative petition was examined by the Napa County Registrar of Voters in accordance with applicable provisions of the California Elections Code; and WHEREAS, the Napa County Registrar of Voters certified that the initiative petition contains a sufficient number of valid signatures of registered voters of the City of American Canyon; and WHEREAS, on June 3, 2026, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2026-___ accepting the certification of sufficiency for Measure M; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to California Elections Code section 9212, prior to taking final action under Elections Code section 9215, the City Council may direct the preparation of a report concerning the potential effects and impacts of the proposed initiative measure; and
WHEREAS, California Elections Code section 9212(b) provides that the report shall be presented to the legislative body within the time prescribed by the legislative body, but no later than 30 days after the elections official certifies to the legislative body the sufficiency of the petition; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to obtain additional information and analysis regarding the potential impacts of Measure M before taking final action pursuant to Elections Code section 9215.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of American Canyon as follows:

SECTION 1. Recitals.

The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference.

SECTION 2. Direction to Prepare Report.

Pursuant to California Elections Code section 9212, the City Council hereby directs staff to prepare a report regarding the proposed initiative ordinance known as Measure M.

SECTION 3. Scope of Report.

The report may address any or all matters identified in California Elections Code section 9212, including but not limited to:
a) Fiscal impacts of the proposed initiative measure;
b) Effects on the internal consistency of the City’s General Plan and specific plans; c) Effects on land use, housing availability, and regional housing needs; d) Impacts on infrastructure and public services, including transportation, parks, and open space; 267
e) Impacts on business and employment;
f) Impacts on traffic congestion, agricultural lands, open space, and developed areas designated for revitalization; and
g) Any other matters deemed relevant by the City Manager, City Attorney, or City Council.

SECTION 4. Timing of Report.

The report shall be presented to the City Council within the time prescribed by the City Council, but no later than 30 days after certification of the sufficiency of the initiative petition in accordance with California Elections Code section 9212.

SECTION 5. Future Council Action.

Following receipt of the report, the City Council shall proceed in accordance with California Elections Code section 9215.

SECTION 6. CEQA.

The City Council finds that adoption of this Resolution is not a project within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378 because it constitutes an administrative and organizational action that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment.

SECTION 7. Certification.

The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of June 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
JUNE 2, 2026

STAFF REPORT

BUSINESS
ITEM NUMBER: 18.

TITLE
Citywide Circulation

RECOMMENDATION
Discussion on Citywide Circulation

CONTACT
Jason Holley, City Manager

BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS
******* Council-Requested Item*******
At the end of its May 19 mee1ng, Council requested a discussion on the topic of "Citywide circulation" at tonight's meeting.

Given the short turnaround, staff endeavored to coalesce relevant documents to aid the discussion.

Potential discussion topics could include:

History of new roads developed since incorporation (private capital vs. public funds).

Current and future planned roadway network west of the highway.

Future planned road improvements and connections to the highway.

Current and future planned a ctive transportation networks.

Roadway safety plans and traffic calming program.

Typical phases and funding sources for City road projects.

Relevant new developer agreements.

Staff will provide a brief presenta1on based on the a>achments and then Council can begin its discussion.

COUNCIL PRIORITY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS
Community and Sense of Place: "Build on the strength of our local community to develop a clear 'sense of place' and establish our unique identity."
269

FISCAL IMPACT
None

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
15378(b) - The ac1on is not a "Project" subject to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") because it does not qualify as a "Project" under Public Resources Code Sec1ons 21065 and 21080 and in Section 15378(b) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.

COMMUNICATION
Level 0: No Further Public Communication Needed
ATTACHMENTS:

0. 2026 Hwy Connection Analysis

1. General Plan 2040 Mobility Element

2. 2022 Local Roadway Safety Plan

3. 2024 Traffic Calming Program

4. 2025 WRSP Implementation Update

5. 2024 Newell Drive Implementation Update

6. 2023 WRSPA

7. 2023 WRSPA Map

8. 2023 Paoli-Watson Lane Annexation EIR (Alt 4 Excerpt)

9. 2019 AC-1 DA

10. 2017 Circulation Update

11. 2015 Traffic Impact Fee Update

12. NVTA GP Amendment Presentation

13. NVTA SR29 Presentation
270
SR 29 Corridor Intersection Configuration Sensitivity
Analysis
1 March 24, 2026
Jason Holley
City Manager
City of American Canyon
4381 Broadway Street, Suite 201
American Canyon, CA 94503
Subject: Amendment No. 1 to Agreement 2025-A162 (TR26-0200) for SR 29 Corridor Intersection Configuration Sensitivity Analysis
Dear Jason,
We understand that the project direction under Agreement 2025-A162 has evolved now that only Alternative 1 of the SR 29 Corridor Improvements is moving forward. The City wishes to undertake a planning-level sensitivity analysis to help the City Council evaluate and compare a defined set of SR 29 intersection configurations at three locations: Eucalyptus Drive (Euc.), Rio Del Mar Road (RDM), and South Napa Junction Road (SNJ), as specifically defined herein.

Kimley-Horn is pleased to offer this amended scope of work. The analysis will evaluate eight (8) intersection configurations, each analyzed under two sub-scenarios (with and without the Main Street extension to South Napa Junction Road), for a total of sixteen (16) scenario combinations.

The evaluation framework will be preliminary traffic analysis using simtraffic analysis relative in nature (a sensitivity analysis, not an absolute traffic operations study) consistent in format and depth with the weighted alternatives scoring methodology used for the West Side Connector evaluation during American Canyon's 2021 Circulation Element update. The format and depth of analysis will be consistent with that prior effort and will not exceed it in technical rigor or scope.

The analysis will rely on readily available existing traffic data, previous study from F&P and approved opening year 2030 traffic data from the SR 29 Corridor PA&ED project and other available City records. No new traffic counts are included in this scope.

Our approach is based on the correspondence from Jason Holley dated March 16th 2026, following key understandings, and assumptions:
• The analysis is planning-level study based on the available information as stated earlier, no new forecast work will be performed. Results are not intended as absolute traffic operations conclusions and shall not be represented as such.
• Eight (8) configurations are to be evaluated, organized into two groups based on whether Rio Del Mar remains 3-legged (Configurations 1–5) or becomes 4-legged (Configurations 6–8), as defined in Task 2.2.
• Each configuration is analyzed under two sub-scenarios: (A) with the Main Street extension to South Napa Junction Road through Adobe Lumber, and (B) without, yielding total sixteen (16) scenario combinations.
• For Configurations 1–5, South Napa Junction Road is extended to Newell Drive via the existing at-grade railroad crossing. Rio Del Mar is not extended through Adobe Lumber. • For Configurations 6–8, Rio Del Mar is extended to Newell Drive through Adobe Lumber via 271
SR 29 Corridor Intersection Configuration Sensitivity
Analysis
2 a new at-grade railroad crossing. South Napa Junction Road does not cross the railroad tracks.
• All existing approaches are assumed to be retained and upgraded to modern multi-modal and safety standards.
• Evaluation criteria will be similar to the one City had developed for West Side Connection.

We will confirm the criteria and finalized with City before scoring begins.

Thank you for the continued opportunity to serve the City of American Canyon. If you have any questions, please contact me at (510) 449- 7337 or [email protected].

Sincerely,
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

Parag Mehta, PE – Project Manager
Vice President
10 S Almaden Blvd, Suite 1250
San Jose, CA 95113
[email protected]
272
SR 29 Corridor Intersection Configuration Sensitivity
Analysis
3 Detailed Scope of Work
This scope is structured as a planning-level sensitivity analysis based on readily available data to support City Council decision-making on SR 29 intersection configurations, organized into four tasks.

Task 1: Project Management and Administration

1.1 Project Kick-off
Conduct one (1) kick-off meeting with City staff to confirm the evaluation framework, finalize the sixteen-scenario matrix, establish evaluation criteria, agree on data sources, and align on deliverable format and schedule.

1.2 Coordination & Meetings
Attend Bi-weekly progress meetings (TEAMS call) with City staff in addition to the kick-off meeting.

Up to three Kimley-Horn staff will attend these calls and prepare and distribute agendas, action items, and meeting summaries. Project duration is anticipated to be 6 months.

1.3 Reporting and Invoicing
Submit monthly progress reports and invoices in the City's specified format.

Task 2: Data Collection and Base Mapping

2.1 Existing Data Review
Compile and review existing data from the SR 29 Corridor PA&ED project and City records, including traffic volumes, turning movement counts, signal timing data, geometric information, right-of-way constraints, environmental studies, railroad crossing records, and the Watson Ranch EIR.

As part of this review, Kimley-Horn will specifically confirm whether:
• Existing turning movement counts at SR 29/Eucalyptus Drive and SR 29/Rio Del Mar Road are no older than three (3) years from Notice to Proceed. Counts older than three (3) years will be flagged as potentially stale and will require additional data collection. • SR 29 mainline volume and gap data are available near South Napa Junction Road sufficient to support planning-level signal warrant screening.
• Watson Ranch trip generation and distribution data from prior studies remains applicable.

Findings will be transmitted to the City in writing within ten (10) business days of Notice to Proceed. If data gaps are identified that cannot be resolved using existing sources and that materially affect the analysis, Kimley-Horn will notify the City in writing. Any additional data Deliverables
• Kick-off meeting agenda and minutes
• Monthly progress reports and invoices
• Biweekly meeting agendas and summaries
273
SR 29 Corridor Intersection Configuration Sensitivity
Analysis
4 collection required will be identified within 10 days of the NTP.

2.2 Configuration Matrix Confirmation
Confirm and document the full 16-scenario evaluation matrix with City staff. The matrix is as follows:

Group A: 3-Legged Rio Del Mar (Configurations 1–5) South Napa Junction extended to Newell Dr. via existing at-grade railroad crossing. Rio Del Mar not extended through Adobe Lumber.

Config. Eucalyptus Dr. Rio Del Mar So. Napa Junction
1 3-Leg Signal 3-Leg Signal 4-Leg Signal
2 4-Leg Signal 3-Leg Signal 4-Leg Signal
3 4-Leg Signal RIRO (no signal) 4-Leg Signal
4 4-Leg Signal OWSC (no signal) 4-Leg Signal
5 3-Leg Signal 3-Leg Signal 4-Leg Unsignalized
(TWSC)
Group B: 4-Legged Rio Del Mar (Configurations 6–8) Rio Del Mar extended to Newell Dr. through Adobe Lumber via new at-grade railroad crossing. South Napa Junction does not cross the railroad tracks.

Config. Eucalyptus Dr. Rio Del Mar So. Napa Junction
6 4-Leg Signal 4-Leg Signal 4-Leg Signal
7 4-Leg Signal 4-Leg Signal 4-Leg Unsignalized
(TWSC)
8 3-Leg Signal 4-Leg Signal 4-Leg Unsignalized
(TWSC)
Each configuration is evaluated under:
• With the extension of Main Street to South Napa Junction Road (through Adobe Lumber) • Without the extension of Main Street to South Napa Junction Road The configuration matrix is fixed upon written confirmation at kick-off. Additions or modifications will require a written scope and fee amendment.

2.3 Evaluation Criteria Development
Working with City staff, develop and finalize a weighted set of evaluation criteria appropriate to this intersection configuration context. Criteria will be selected from the following categories:
• Traffic Operations (SR 29 mainline and local intersections) • Multi-Modal Connectivity and Safety (pedestrians, bicyclists, transit) 274
SR 29 Corridor Intersection Configuration Sensitivity
Analysis
5 • Network Connectivity and Circulation
• Constructability / Right-of-Way Requirements
• Railroad Crossing Implications
• Environmental Constraints
• Relative Capital Cost
• Implementation Timeline / Phasing Compatibility
Criteria and weightings will be confirmed in writing by City staff before scoring begins. Written confirmation constitutes authorization to proceed with Task 3. Kimley-Horn will not initiate scoring until that confirmation is received.

Task 3: Sensitivity Analysis and Scoring

3.1 Planning-Level Traffic and Operations Assessment
Using existing data from the SR 29 Corridor PA&ED project and City records, develop relative traffic and operations ratings for each of the 16 scenarios against the traffic-related evaluation criteria.

Where necessary to distinguish between configurations, qualitative professional judgment informed by existing data will be applied and documented with a brief rationale for each rating.

For signalized configurations, assessments will be based on a comparison of approach volumes and directional demand using existing PA&ED data and forecasts. For unsignalized configurations (TWSC and RIRO), assessments will use SR 29 mainline gap data and cross-street demand volumes to develop relative operational ratings only. No HCM capacity analysis, Synchro modeling, or formal gap acceptance calculations are included.

3.2 Preliminary Configuration Layouts and Order-of-Magnitude Assessment To inform scoring of the ROW, environmental, and cost criteria in the matrix, Kimley-Horn will prepare preliminary conceptual layouts for each of the eight (8) base configurations. Layouts will be prepared at a 5–10% level of design (sufficient to identify approximate intersection footprints, rightof-way extents, and major physical constraints) and will not constitute engineered design documents.

Based on these layouts, Kimley-Horn will develop the following for each configuration:
• A relative order-of-magnitude construction cost assessment, expressed as a comparative range (e.g., low / medium / high / very high relative to other configurations) and not as a detailed engineer's estimate. Absolute dollar figures, if included, will be clearly labeled as planning-level order-of-magnitude only and shall not be used for budgeting, grant applications, or contract purposes.
• A qualitative identification of right-of-way impacts, including whether new ROW acquisition from identified parcels (including Adobe Lumber) appears likely to be required.

Deliverables
• Written data review findings memo
• Confirmed configuration matrix memo
• Confirmed evaluation criteria and weighting summary
275
SR 29 Corridor Intersection Configuration Sensitivity
Analysis
6 • A qualitative identification of potential environmental constraints visible from existing studies and aerial review, including but not limited to wetland buffers, railroad corridor setbacks, and known biological or cultural resource areas documented in the Watson Ranch EIR or SR 29 PA&ED.

Layouts will be prepared using available base mapping from the SR 29 Corridor PA&ED project. No new survey, geotechnical investigation, utility potholing, or environmental field work is included.

Layouts are schematic only and do not represent Caltrans-approvable geometric designs.

The sixteen (16) sub-scenarios (A and B for each configuration) will not receive independent layouts.

The Main Street extension sub-scenarios will be addressed through notation on the applicable base configuration layout rather than separate drawing sheets.

Deliverables: Eight (8) schematic configuration layout exhibits at 5–10% level; comparative orderof-magnitude cost summary table; ROW and environmental constraint summary table; all formatted for direct incorporation into the scoring matrix.

3.3 Multi-Criteria Scoring Matrix
Using the traffic and operations ratings developed in Task 3.1 and the layout, cost, ROW, and environmental findings developed in Task 3.2, develop a weighted multi-criteria scoring matrix evaluating all 16 scenarios against the confirmed evaluation criteria. Each scenario receives a relative score per criterion; criteria weights are applied to produce a weighted composite score. The lowest composite score represents the most favorable configuration. Scoring methodology will follow the West Side Connector approach (2021), adapted for this context.

Each score will be documented with a brief supporting rationale referencing the specific Task 3.1 or Task 3.2 finding that supports the rating. Scores derived from the preliminary layouts in Task 3.2 will be clearly identified as based on schematic-level design only.

City staff will provide one (1) round of consolidated, non-conflicting written comments on the draft scoring matrix within ten (10) business days of submission. A second round of revisions is not included in this scope.

3.4 Sensitivity Check on Criteria Weighting
Conduct a limited sensitivity check by adjusting the weighting of the highest-priority criteria across up to three (3) alternative weighting scenarios to illustrate whether rankings are robust or sensitive to priority assumptions. No additional weighting scenarios are included.

Task 4: Report and Presentation

4.1 Draft Sensitivity Analysis Report
Prepare a draft report suitable for City Council consideration, including:

Deliverables:
• Planning Level Traffic Analysis
• Preliminary Design and Costs
• Draft Multi-Criteria Scoring Matrix (for City review and comment) • Final Multi-Criteria Scoring Matrix incorporating City comments • Criteria weighting sensitivity summary
276
SR 29 Corridor Intersection Configuration Sensitivity
Analysis
7 • Project background and purpose
• Description of all 16 scenarios with configuration matrix and exhibits • Evaluation criteria and weighting rationale
• Scoring methodology
• Multi-criteria scoring matrix results and rankings
• Summary bar chart of weighted scores (consistent with West Side Connector format) • Key findings and identification of top-performing and low-performing configurations • Schematic configuration layout exhibits and order-of-magnitude cost and ROW summary tables (from Task 3.2)
The report will be formatted for a non-technical City Council audience and will not exceed the format and depth of the 2021 West Side Connector evaluation presentation.

4.2 City Staff Review and Comment
Incorporate one (1) round of consolidated, non-conflicting City staff comments into the Final Sensitivity Analysis Report.

4.3 City Council Presentation
Prepare a presentation based solely on the Final Report content; no new analysis, scenarios, or scoring will be introduced. Attend and present at one (1) City Council meeting.

Deliverables:
• Draft Sensitivity Analysis Report (for City staff review) • Final Sensitivity Analysis Report incorporating City
comments
• City Council presentation slides
• Attendance at one (1) City Council meeting
277
SR 29 Corridor Intersection Configuration Sensitivity
Analysis
8 Overall Project Assumptions:

1. Scope Nature: Planning-level, relative sensitivity analysis only. Not a traffic study, signal warrant analysis, Caltrans DEER, or PS&E document.

2. City Data Responsibilities: The City will provide all relevant existing project data, including traffic counts, signal timing, geometric and ROW information, railroad crossing records, and environmental documents

3. Railroad Crossings: Railroad crossing implications will be addressed as a qualitative evaluation criterion only. No railroad engineering design or agency coordination is included.

4. Environmental Review: No CEQA or NEPA analysis is included. Existing environmental documents and available information will be used as inputs to the scoring criteria only.

5. Right-of-Way: No ROW appraisal, acquisition, or legal description services are included.

6. Cost Estimates: No detailed engineer's estimates are included. Relative capital cost is addressed as a qualitative scoring criterion only.

Overall Project Exclusions:

1. New traffic counts or field data collection of any kind.

2. Full traffic operations analysis (LOS, signal warrant analysis, Synchro/SimTraffic modeling).

3. Caltrans coordination, DEER preparation, or PS&E design documents.

4. Railroad engineering, railroad regulatory coordination (CPUC, UPRR/NWPR, etc.), or atgrade crossing design.

5. CEQA or NEPA environmental technical studies.

6. Right-of-way appraisal, acquisition, or legal services.

7. Geotechnical investigation.

8. Detailed engineer's estimates or cost-benefit analysis.

9. Detailed geometric design, construction documents, or engineer's estimates for any configuration. Task 3.2 layouts are schematic only and shall not be used for design, permitting, or cost-estimation purposes beyond the relative scoring context of this analysis.

10. Public or stakeholder outreach beyond the single City Council presentation identified in Task

4.3. Project Schedule
It is anticipated that the project duration will 6 months. A detailed schedule will be confirmed at the kick-off meeting.

Cost Estimate and Level of Effort
Kimley-Horn proposes to execute this scope of work on a fixed-price (lump sum), not-to-exceed basis. The total fee for this Amendment No. 1 is $293,700, which is $73,380 below the original Agreement 2025-A162 amount of $367,080. Invoicing will be on a monthly basis for percent 278
SR 29 Corridor Intersection Configuration Sensitivity
Analysis
9 complete by task. A summary of estimated level of effort and costs by task is provided below..

AGREED AND ACCEPTED:

City of American Canyon
By:

Title:

Date:
279
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

Name
Parag
Mehta
Vignesh
Swaminathan
Ravi
Puttagunta
Professional Professional Analyst II Analyst I Project Support TOTAL HOURS
TOTAL
COST Category/Title Project Manager Deputy Project Manager Sr Professional II Billing Rate $430 $280 $375 $250 $220 $190 $175 $165
Task 1 Task 1: Project Management and Administration 10 22 10 24 2 12 80 $ 22,000

1.1 Project Kickoff & Planning 2 4 4 4 2 16 $ 4,800 1.2 Coordination & Meetings 6 12 6 12 36 $ 10,900 1.3 Reporting and Invoicing 2 6 8 12 28 $ 6,300 Task 2 Task 2: Data Collection and Base Mapping 8 24 18 40 36 8 2 136 $ 35,700

2.1 Existing Data Review 2 8 8 24 24 8 74 $ 18,100 2.2 Configuration Matrix Confirmation 2 8 2 8 4 24 $ 6,700 2.2 Evaluation Cirteria Development 4 8 8 8 8 2 38 $ 10,900 Task 3 Task 3: Sensitivity analysis and Scoring 14 72 76 48 144 212 320 4 890 $ 195,400

3.1 Planning-Level Traffic and Operations Assessment 4 12 60 120 80 160 432 $ 97,200 3.2 Preliminary Configuration Layouts and Order-of-Magnitude Assessment 4 40 24 120 160 4 348 $ 70,400 3.3 Multi-Criteria Scoring Matrix 4 12 8 24 24 68 $ 19,400 3.4 Sensitivity Check on Creiteria Weighting 2 8 8 12 28 $ 8,400 Task 4 Task 4: Report and Presentation 12 56 16 16 64 160 8 10 342 $ 34,100

4.1 Draft Sensitivity Analysis Report 4 24 8 40 120 8 204 $ 44,400 4.2 City Staff Review and Comment 4 8 4 20 40 2 78 $ 17,800 4.3 Feasibility Report/Presentation 4 24 4 16 4 8 60 $ 16,300 TOTAL HOURS 44 174 120 104 232 408 338 28 1,448
Subtotal Labor: $18,920.00 $48,720.00 $45,000.00 $26,000.00 $51,106.00 $77,520.00 $59,150.00 $4,620.00 $ 287,200 Other Direct Costs $ 6,500 Travel/Mileage/Outside Printing/Courier Services/Etc. $ 1,500 Traffic Data Collection $ 5,000 TOTAL COST: $ 293,700
280
N
ALTERNATIVE 0:

Existing Conditions
E Rio Del Mar Rolling Hills Dr
Donaldson Way
Poco Way S Napa Junction Rd W Rio Del Mar Main St
Donaldson Way
Melvin Rd
Antonina Ave Marcus Rd

STOP STOP
STOP

STOP STOP
Frontier St
STOP STOP STOP STOPSummerwood Dr
R R
R R
Main St
Broadway St Union Pacific Railroad
Newell Dr
E Eucalyptus
Dr
W Eucalyptus Dr
281
N
ALTERNATIVE 1:

S Napa Junction Extension to Newell (Signalized)
E Rio Del Mar Newell Dr
Rolling Hills Dr
Donaldson Way
Poco Way W Rio Del Mar Main St
E Eucalyptus
Dr
Donaldson Way
Melvin Rd
Antonina Ave Marcus Rd
STOP

STOP STOP
Frontier St
STOP STOP STOPSummerwood Dr
R R
Main St
60' Section:
(2) 12' Vehicle Lanes
(2) 7' Bike Lanes
(2) 5' Landscape Buffers
(2) 6' Sidewalks
Union Pacific Railroad
R R
Modify existing
railroad crossing
W Eucalyptus Dr
Broadway St
Potential Main St
Extension
STOP S Napa
Junction Rd
282
N
ALTERNATIVE 2:

S Napa Junction Extension to Newell (Signalized) & Eucalyptus Extension to SR 29 E Rio Del Mar Newell Dr
Rolling Hills Dr
Donaldson Way
Poco Way W Rio Del Mar Main St
Eucalyptus Dr Donaldson Way
Melvin Rd
Antonina Ave Marcus Rd
STOP

STOP STOP
Frontier St
STOP STOP STOPSummerwood Dr
R R
Main St Union Pacific Railroad
Modify existing
railroad crossing
Demolish
existing
Eucalyptus Dr
60' Section:
(2) 12' Vehicle Lanes
(2) 7' Bike Lanes
(2) 5' Landscape Buffers
(2) 6' Sidewalks Broadway St
60' Section:
(2) 12' Vehicle Lanes
(2) 7' Bike Lanes
(2) 5' Landscape Buffers
(2) 6' Sidewalks
Potential Main St
Extension

STOP R R
S Napa
Junction Rd
283
N
ALTERNATIVE 3:

S Napa Junction Extension to Newell (Signalized), Eucalyptus Extension to SR 29, & Rio del Mar made Right-in, Right Out E Rio Del Mar Newell Dr Rolling Hills Dr
Donaldson Way
Poco Way
W Rio Del Mar Main St
Eucalyptus Dr Donaldson Way
Melvin Rd
Antonina Ave Marcus Rd
STOP

STOP STOP
Frontier St
STOP STOP STOPSummerwood Dr
R R
Main St Union Pacific Railroad
Modify existing
railroad crossing
Demolish
existing
Eucalyptus Dr Broadway St
60' Section:
(2) 12' Vehicle Lanes
(2) 7' Bike Lanes
(2) 5' Landscape Buffers
(2) 6' Sidewalks
Close Median,
Rio Del Mar to
be Right-in,
Right-out
S Napa
Junction Rd
60' Section:
(2) 12' Vehicle Lanes
(2) 7' Bike Lanes
(2) 5' Landscape Buffers
(2) 6' Sidewalks
Potential Main St
Extension

STOP R R
284
N
ALTERNATIVE 4:

S Napa Junction Extension to Newell (Signalized), Eucalyptus Extension to SR 29, & Rio del Mar Signal Removed E Rio Del Mar Newell Dr
Rolling Hills Dr
Donaldson Way
Poco Way W Rio
Del Mar Main St
Eucalyptus Dr Donaldson Way
Melvin Rd
Antonina Ave Marcus Rd
STOP

STOP STOP
Frontier St
STOP STOP STOPSummerwood Dr
R R
Main St Union Pacific Railroad
Modify existing
railroad crossing
Demolish
existing
Eucalyptus Dr Broadway St
STOP
Remove Signal, Rio
Del Mar to be side
street stop controlled
(left turns permitted)
60' Section:
(2) 12' Vehicle Lanes
(2) 7' Bike Lanes
(2) 5' Landscape Buffers
(2) 6' Sidewalks
60' Section:
(2) 12' Vehicle Lanes
(2) 7' Bike Lanes
(2) 5' Landscape Buffers
(2) 6' Sidewalks
Potential Main St
Extension

STOP R R
S Napa
Junction Rd
285
N
ALTERNATIVE 5:

S Napa Junction Extension to Newell (Stop Control Maintained) E Rio Del Mar Newell Dr
Rolling Hills Dr
Donaldson Way
Poco Way W Rio Del Mar Main St
Donaldson Way
Melvin Rd
Antonina Ave Marcus Rd
STOP

STOP STOP
Frontier St
STOP STOP STOPSummerwood Dr
R R
Main St Union Pacific Railroad
Modify existing
railroad crossing Broadway St
STOP
E Eucalyptus
Dr
W Eucalyptus Dr
60' Section:
(2) 12' Vehicle Lanes
(2) 7' Bike Lanes
(2) 5' Landscape Buffers
(2) 6' Sidewalks
Potential Main St
Extension

STOP R R
S Napa
Junction Rd
STOP
286
N
ALTERNATIVE 6:

Rio del Mar Extension to SR 29, Eucalyptus Extension to SR 29, & Signal at S Napa Junction
NVTA's SR 29 Corridor Improvement Project Analysis
E Rio Del Mar Rolling Hills Dr
Donaldson Way
Poco Way S Napa Junction Rd W Rio Del Mar Main St
Donaldson Way
Melvin Rd
Antonina Ave Marcus Rd
STOP

STOP STOP
Frontier St
STOP STOP STOP STOPSummerwood Dr
R R
R R
Main St
Broadway St Union Pacific Railroad
Newell Dr
70' Section:
(1) 14' Median
(2) 12' Vehicle Lanes
(2) 5' Bike Lanes
(2) 5' Landscape Buffers
Potential Main St
(2) 6' Sidewalks
Extension STOP Close existing
railroad crossing R R
New At-grade
crossing,
overcrossing, or
Eucalyptus Dr
undercrossing
Demolish
existing
Eucalyptus Dr
60' Section:
(2) 12' Vehicle Lanes
(2) 7' Bike Lanes
(2) 5' Landscape Buffers
(2) 6' Sidewalks
287
N
ALTERNATIVE 7:

Rio del Mar Extension to SR 29 & Eucalyptus Extension to SR 29 E Rio Del Mar Rolling Hills Dr
Donaldson Way
Poco Way S Napa Junction Rd W Rio Del Mar Main St
Donaldson Way
Melvin Rd
Antonina Ave Marcus Rd
STOP

STOP STOP
Frontier St
STOP STOP STOP STOPSummerwood Dr
R R
R R
Main St
Broadway St Union Pacific Railroad
Newell Dr
70' Section:
(1) 14' Median
(2) 12' Vehicle Lanes
(2) 5' Bike Lanes
(2) 5' Landscape Buffers
Potential Main St
(2) 6' Sidewalks
Extension STOP Close existing
railroad crossing R R
New At-grade
crossing,
overcrossing, or
undercrossing
STOP
STOP
Eucalyptus Dr
Demolish
existing
Eucalyptus Dr
60' Section:
(2) 12' Vehicle Lanes
(2) 7' Bike Lanes
(2) 5' Landscape Buffers
(2) 6' Sidewalks
288
N
ALTERNATIVE 8:

Rio del Mar Extension to SR 29
E Rio Del Mar Rolling Hills Dr
Donaldson Way
Poco Way S Napa Junction Rd W Rio Del Mar Main St
Donaldson Way
Melvin Rd
Antonina Ave Marcus Rd
STOP

STOP STOP
Frontier St
STOP STOP STOP STOPSummerwood Dr
R R
R R
Main St
Broadway St Union Pacific Railroad
Newell Dr
E Eucalyptus
Dr
W Eucalyptus Dr
70' Section:
(1) 14' Median
(2) 12' Vehicle Lanes
(2) 5' Bike Lanes
(2) 5' Landscape Buffers
Potential Main St
(2) 6' Sidewalks
Extension STOP Close existing
railroad crossing R R
New At-grade
crossing,
overcrossing, or
undercrossing
STOP
STOP
289

4. MOBILITY
Mobility Element | November 2025 | M-1
Mobility
The Mobility Element provides a framework for decisions concerning the City’s multimodal transportation network. Correlated with the Land Use Element, the Mobility Element guides a safe and efficient transportation system that includes roadway, transit, bicycle, pedestrian, rail transport, and aviation. Recognizing the contribution of transportation to greenhouse gas emissions, the Mobility Element integrates with Climate Change and Sustainability policies.
4 290
M-2 | Mobility Element | November 2025
This page is intentionally left blank.
291

4. MOBILITY
Mobility Element | November 2025 | M-3
Mobility Vision
The City of American Canyon is a community that embraces mobility through all transportation modes. The core value of the Mobility Element is to provide safe and easy travel for pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders and motor vehicles correlated with the Land Use Element.

This community mobility value is based on enhancing the City’s " sense of place" with a strong emphasis on all forms of mobility safety and environmental protection. An efficient multi-modal plan will improve our sense of place, provide greater mobility choice for all residents, and help the environment. 292
M-4 | Mobility Element | November 2025
Introduction
The Mobility Element provides a vision and guiding principles for the transportation system, and detailed goals and policies which implement a compete streets approach to mobility in the future.

Local transportation planning is a coordinated effort involving local and regional agencies. The goals and policies set forth in this document are intended to promote local planning but also foster cooperation between jurisdictional partners such as the Napa Valley Transportation Authority ( NVTA), the Metropolitan Transportation Commission ( MTC) and the California Department of Transportation ( Caltrans).

The transportation planning and policy in the Mobility Element includes a critical component of the City' s responsibility towards supporting regional efforts to meet greenhouse gas reduction targets, through coordinating planning for land use, transportation, and housing. The Regional Transportation Plan and Sustainable Community Strategy ( RTP/ SCS) for the San Francisco Bay Area, Plan Bay Area 2050, was jointly produced and adopted by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission ( MTC) and Association of Bay Area Governments ABAG) on October 21, 2021. Plan Bay Area 2050 is the strategic update to Plan 293

4. MOBILITY
Mobility Element | November 2025 | M-5
Bay Area 2040, and it connects the elements of housing, the economy, transportation, and the environment through 35 strategies that will make the Bay Area more equitable for all residents and more resilient in the face of unexpected challenges. It is a roadmap to help Bay Area cities and counties preserve the character of our diverse communities while adapting to the challenges of future population growth.

A portion of the Planning Area - the Broadway District (SR 29) corridor - has been designated by MTC and ABAG as a Priority Development Area (PDA), meaning that it is recognized as an area with substantial opportunity for infill development near transit. PDAs play a critical role in accommodating future growth in the regional agencies' SCS plans.

California Planning Requirements
Required General Plan Element. California law mandates a “ Mobility Element” or “ Circulation Element” that contains the “ general location and extent of existing and proposed major thoroughfares, transportation routes, and other local public utilities and facilities, all correlated with the land use element” of the General Plan per Government Code Section 65302 ( b).

Complete Streets Act. The term “ complete streets” refers to a balanced, multimodal transportation network that meets the needs of all users of streets including bicyclists, children, persons with disabilities, motorists, movers of commercial goods, pedestrians, public transportation, and seniors. A complete street is one that provides safe and convenient travel in a manner that is suitable for the local context. In 2012, the City adopted a Complete Streets Policy Resolution 2012-72).

The Mobility Element is consistent with the California Complete Streets Act (AB 1358), which requires cities and counties incorporate “ Complete Street” policies when updating their General Plan Mobility Element. Complete streets make travel safe for all users, including bicyclists, pedestrians, motorists, transit vehicles, and people of all ages and abilities. While every street does not need to provide dedicated space to all users, the street network must accommodate the needs of all users.

Economically, complete streets help lower transportation costs by enabling people to use transit, walking, or bicycling rather than driving to reach their destinations. Caltrans is actively engaged in implementing its complete streets policy in all planning, programming, design, construction, operations, and maintenance activities for the State highway system.
294
M-6 | Mobility Element | November 2025
Provision of safe mobility for all users contributes to the Caltrans’ s vision:
improving mobility across California.” The successful long-term implementation of this vision will provide more options for people to travel from one place to another, less traffic congestion, fewer greenhouse gas emissions, more walkable communities ( with healthier, more active people), and fewer barriers for older adults, children, and people with disabilities.

Local Roadway Safety Plan. American Canyon is currently preparing a Local Roadway Safety Plan ( LRSP). Required for an agency to apply for Federal Highway Safety Improvement Program ( HSIP) funding, the LRSP will proactively correct high collision or problem locations and prevent local road fatalities and injuries. The final plan will recommend proven countermeasures, provide a structure and realistic set of responses that implement changes over time, will integrate the “ 5 E’s” approach ( Education, Enforcement, Education, Emergency Service, and Engineering) in its proposed solution strategies, and identify road safety partners that could sustain a long-term effort.

Traffic Calming Program. The American Canyon “ We Safe Streets” Traffic Calming Program provides a framework for the community to submit concerns of problem areas to our Traffic Calming Team for evaluation. The Program includes criteria to assess the magnitude of the need to modify a street or roadway, and probable effectiveness of a potential traffic calming measure installation.

Capital Improvement Programs. California Government Code Section 65401 specifies public works projects must conform to the General Plan. In practice, this requires the Five-Year Capital Improvement Program ( CIP) adoption include findings that the proposed City of American Canyon Five-Year CIP conforms with the General Plan, which includes the Mobility Element.

Vehicle Miles Traveled. The Mobility Element aligns with Senate Bill (SB) 743, which revised the California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA) guidelines by designating vehicle miles traveled ( VMT) as the primary metric for evaluating transportation impacts, effective July 1, 2020. This shift emphasizes statewide 295

4. MOBILITY
Mobility Element | November 2025 | M-7
priorities such as infill development, investment in transit, active transportation, public health, and the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions— rather than focusing solely on local traffic congestion.

Under the updated CEQA standards, transportation impact analysis is no longer based on Level of Service ( LOS), which measured vehicle delay. Instead, VMT now serves as the standard metric for assessing the transportation impacts of development projects.

Although LOS is no longer used for CEQA compliance, it remains a valuable tool for non-CEQA planning and for helping the City ensure its roadways function effectively and meet community expectations, particularly on key corridors. 296
M-8 | Mobility Element | November 2025
Transportation Setting
American Canyon is in southern Napa County, approximately 35 miles northeast of San Francisco. To the south, it borders the city of Vallejo in Solano County. To the north, the cities of Napa, St. Helena, Calistoga, and the Town of Yountville lie along State Route 29 ( SR 29), a key corridor serving wine country destinations— just as it does in American Canyon, where it also bisects the city.

As of 2020, American Canyon had an estimated population of 21,800, growing from 19,454 in 2010 and 9,774 in 2000, making it the second most populous city in Napa County after Napa itself. With its abundant recreational amenities, nearby wineries, and proximity to Napa Valley, Sonoma County, the East Bay, San Francisco, and Sacramento, American Canyon attracts a diverse mix of roadway users daily.

State Route 29, which runs primarily at-grade through the city, functions as a major thoroughfare for both local and regional traffic. The city’s streets support a wide variety of users, including pedestrians, cyclists, transit riders, passenger vehicles, and freight trucks—serving a blend of local, recreational, and regional travel demands.

MOB- Figure 1 shows the existing mobility system map. Traffic to and from the I80 corridor is served by American Canyon Road and Jameson Canyon Road ( SR 12). Access to and from Vallejo and the East Bay, including the Counties of Contra Costa and Alameda, is provided via Flosden Road and SR 29. To and from the north, access is provided via SR 29 and SR 12, which also collects traffic from the rest of Napa County. Marin and Sonoma counties to the west and northwest may also access the city using SR 29 via SR 37.

Rail transportation in the city is currently limited to freight service only. No commuter rail service exists in the city or county. The main rail line in the city is owned by Union Pacific Railroad Company and enters the city parallel to and on the east side of SR 29 at the Solano County line.
297

4. MOBILITY
Mobility Element | November 2025 | M-9
MOB- Figure 1: Existing Mobility System Map
298
M-10 | Mobility Element | November 2025
Local Travel Trends
The U.S. Census Bureau tracks “ journey to work” data through its decennial census and the American Community Survey. MOB-Figure 2 illustrates commuting patterns in and out of American Canyon. Of the 4,089 people employed within the city, only 432 are residents, while 3,657 commute in from outside areas. Meanwhile, more than 9,000 American Canyon residents travel outside the city for work.

MOB-Figure 2: Employment Inflow-Outflow Travel Patterns ( 2017) The vast majority of American Canyon residents commute by car, with nearly 79 percent driving alone and 14 percent carpooling, as shown in MOB-Table 1.

Only about 3 percent use other modes of transportation, including 2.4 percent by public transit and less than 1 percent by walking or biking.

MOB-Table 1: Means of Transportation to Work (Residents) 1990 2000 2010 2018
Single- Occupancy Vehicle 73. 9% 73. 3% 78. 2% 78. 5%
Carpool 21. 4% 20. 6% 13. 7% 14. 1%
Work from Home/ Other 1.5% 3.3% 3.8% 2.9%
Public Transit 0.8% 1.5% 2.0% 2.4%
Motorcycle or Other 2.4% 0.2% 0.7% 1.3%
Source: US Census Bureau, 1990 and 2000 Summary files, and American Community Survey ( ACS) 5-Year Estimates for 2006- 2010 and 2014- 2018.

As shown on MOB- Table 2: while many American Canyon residents commute less than 25 miles to work, nearly 1,500 residents ( 15 percent) must travel more 299

4. MOBILITY
Mobility Element | November 2025 | M-11
than 50 miles for work each day. American Canyon employed residents have heavy commute patterns south and north of the city, and most of these residents travel north to the city of Napa.

MOB- Table 2: Travel Time to Work (Residents)
Travel Number Percent
Less than 10 miles 2,977 30. 1%
10 to 24 miles 3,514 35. 5%
25 to 50 miles 1,920 19.4%
Greater than 50 miles 1,488 15. 0%
Total 9,899 100.00%
Source: US Census Bureau, Center for Economic Studies, LEHD On the Map.

During the five-year period between 2017 and 2021, there were two fatal and five severe injury collisions recorded for the roadways under the City of American Canyon’ s jurisdiction. There were two fatal and 10 severe injury collisions on SR 29. MOB- Figure 3 shows the locations of fatal and severe injuries.

Active Transportation
American Canyon features more than 13 miles of bicycle infrastructure, including over 8 miles of Class I multiuse paths, 2.8 miles of Class II bike lanes, and more than 2 miles of Class III designated routes on public roadways.

While most areas of the city have sidewalks, pedestrian infrastructure is limited in some places— especially in older neighborhoods with a more rural character and in the absence of a centralized downtown. Sidewalk coverage is particularly sparse along SR 29, the city’ s main commercial corridor.

According to MOB-Figure 4, bicycle collisions between 2017 and 2021 were concentrated along American Canyon Road. MOB- Figure 5 shows that pedestrian collisions during the same period were primarily located along SR 29 and American Canyon Road.

Public Transit Service
Public transportation within the city is provided by American Canyon Transit, which is a part of the Napa Valley Transportation Authority ( NVTA) Vine Transit system. American Canyon Transit is a fixed route and on-demand, door-to-door, transit service within specific areas of the city. Vine’ s Route 29 ( Napa- BART) Express connects the BART Station in El Cerrito to the Redwood Park- n-Ride in the city of Napa and stops in American Canyon at the Post Office on Crawford Way.
300
M-12 | Mobility Element | November 2025
MOB-Figure 3: Fatal and Severe Injury Collision Locations 2017-21 301

4. MOBILITY
Mobility Element | November 2025 | M-13
MOB- Figure 4: Bicycle Collision Locations 2017- 21
302
M-14 | Mobility Element | November 2025
MOB-Figure 5: Pedestrian Collision Locations 2017-21
303

4. MOBILITY
Mobility Element | November 2025 | M-15
Airport
The Napa County Airport is located just northwest of American Canyon, in unincorporated Napa County. Originally constructed by the U.S. Army Air Force in 1942, it was transferred to Napa County for civilian use following World War II. The nearest major commercial airports are in Oakland, San Francisco, and Sacramento.

Land use around the airport is guided by the Napa Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan, adopted by the Napa County Airport Land Use Commission in December 2024.

Street System Plan
The planned street network will provide an efficient transportation system that includes a citywide network of complete streets. A commitment to providing complete streets is a key to effective transportation planning and will maximize the effectiveness of the existing street network.

Street Classifications
American Canyon consists of a network of complete streets. These streets play an integral role in connecting the city to other destinations in Napa County, the adjacent city of Vallejo, Solano County, and the San Francisco Bay Area. MOBFigure 6 shows the planned buildout street network based on the following classifications:

Arterial Streets. Arterial facilities in American Canyon accommodate all travel modes and link major activity centers throughout the urban area.

These roads also serve to channel vehicle traffic from freeways and highways to the city's collector streets. Within American Canyon, arterial roads— such as American Canyon Road, Flosden Road, and Newell Drive—typically include four vehicle lanes, bicycle lanes, and sidewalks, with posted speed limits ranging from 30 to 45 mph.

SR 29, a designated Regional Arterial, bisects the city and provides key interregional access— connecting to Vallejo in the south and the rest of Napa County to the north. SR 29 serves a dual role: offering local, crosstown access for all modes of travel and supporting regional mobility primarily for motor vehicles, including public transit. This regional traffic 304
M-16 | Mobility Element | November 2025
includes two main components: " through" traffic that passes through the city without stopping, and " commute" traffic that either begins or ends within American Canyon.

Collectors. Collector streets accommodate all travel modes and serve as links between local streets and arterial roads, providing access to residential, commercial, and industrial areas. In American Canyon, these streets typically feature two vehicle lanes— one in each direction— with speed limits up to 30 mph. Notable examples include Broadway Street, Eucalyptus Drive, Green Island Road, Rio Del Mar, Donaldson Way, and Commerce Boulevard.

Local Streets. Local streets provide direct access for all travel modes to abutting properties and allow for localized movement of traffic. Local streets are characterized by low daily traffic volumes and current operating speeds of 25 to 30 mph.

MOB-Figure 6: Standard Roadway Cross Sections
SR 29 Corridor Planning
Broadway SR 29) is a four-lane highway running through American Canyon.

Between Napa Junction Road and American Canyon Road, it serves as a defining feature of the City— shaping the experience of residents, businesses, and the thousands of drivers who pass through daily. Local planning efforts have led to the development of preliminary design concepts for this corridor, which have been shared with the community through public workshops for input and feedback.
305

4. MOBILITY
Mobility Element | November 2025 | M-17
Planning for the SR 29 corridor is a high priority not just for American Canyon, but for the entire region. Communities in both Solano County to the south and Napa County to the north depend on SR 29 for daily travel related to work, school, shopping, and recreation.

As a State- owned roadway, Caltrans plays a central role in approving and funding any improvements to SR 29. All planning and implementation efforts require Caltrans review and authorization, and State funding is administered through the agency.

Currently, the City—working in partnership with the Napa Valley Transportation Authority ( NVTA)— is advancing the American Canyon Multimodal Improvement Project. This effort is evaluating two options for enhancing the Broadway segment between Napa Junction Road and American Canyon Road. Both options include landscape upgrades, pedestrian improvements, and multimodal features. Option 2 retains the existing four-lane configuration and introduces roundabouts at major intersections.
306
M-18 | Mobility Element | November 2025
MOB-Figure 7: American Canyon Multimodal Improvement Project Option 2 Newell Drive and South Kelly Road
Extensions
The Mobility Element roadway network includes extension of Newell Drive north from its current terminus concurrent with future development. MOBFigure 8 shows the conceptual future alignment of Newell Drive. The precise alignment will be determined through future planning processes. As envisioned, Newell Drive would eventually connect American Canyon Road in the south with SR 29 at Green Island Road. In addition, South Kelly Road would extend south from North Kelly Road to a new connection with Newell Drive. The future roads would be a 2-lane collector with one motor vehicle lane in each direction, bicycle lanes and sidewalks.

West Side Connector
A West Side Connector ( WSC) roadway has been part of the General Plan since its adoption in 1994. A “ Circulation Element Advisory Committee” was appointed by the City Council to provide input on a revised “ West Side Connector” road alignment. The Committee considered four roadway alignments. On June 15, 2021, the Committee recommended a new east- west roadway that would connect the northern edge of Commerce Court to the western terminus of Hess Road. This alignment is reflected on MOB Figure 8:

General Plan Mobility System Map.
307

4. MOBILITY
Mobility Element | November 2025 | M-19
Rio Del Mar East
The General Plan envisions extending Rio Del Mar east from its terminus at SR

29. Within the new roadway segment, Rio Del Mar East will cross the Union Pacific Railroad line at-grade. When completed, Rio Del Mar East will connect SR 29 on the west to Newell Drive on the east as a 2-lane arterial and serve as a cross- town east- west roadway arterial.

Vision Zero
The Mobility Element includes Vision Zero goals and policies. Vision Zero aims to eliminate all traffic fatalities and severe injuries, while increasing safe, healthy, and equitable mobility for all. Traffic deaths and injuries can be reduced over time by prioritizing traffic safety as a public health issue. The City of American Canyon Local Roadway Safety Plan ( LRSP) identifies safety countermeasures to improve safety.
308
M-20 | Mobility Element | November 2025
MOB-Figure 8: General Plan Mobility System Map
309

4. MOBILITY
Mobility Element | November 2025 | M-21
Bikeway Network Plan
American Canyon is ideally situated for bicycle and pedestrian mobility, with a generally flat topography, scenic landscapes in the Newell Open Space and Napa River Wetlands a short distance to the east, west, and north. Combined with the Napa Valley Vine Trail, the goal is to interconnect American Canyon as well as the surrounding communities in the County with a seamless bicycle network for recreational and commuter use. The plan includes proposed bicycle and pedestrian trails, as well as on-street bicycle facilities to complete the partial network already in place in the city and county.

Types of Bikeways
Four classes of bikeways are defined by Caltrans:

Class I Multi Use Path. Typically known as bike paths, Class I facilities are multi-use facilities that provide a completely separated right-of-way for the exclusive use of bicycles and pedestrians with cross flows of motorized traffic minimized.

Class II Bike Lane. Known as bike lanes, Class II facilities provide a striped and signed lane for one-way bicycle travel on each side of a street or highway. The minimum width for bike lanes ranges between four and five feet depending upon the edge of roadway conditions ( curbs). Bike lanes are demarcated by a six-inch white stripe, signage and pavement legends.

Class Ill Bike Route. Known as bike
routes, Class Ill facilities provide signs for
shared use with motor vehicles within the
same travel lane on a street or highway.

Bike routes may be enhanced with
warning or guide signs and shared lane
marking pavement stencils. While Class Ill
routes do not provide measures of
separation, they have an important
function in providing continuity to the
bikeway network.
310
M-22 | Mobility Element | November 2025
Class IV Separated Bikeway. A Class IV Bikeway is for the exclusive use of bicycles and includes a separation between the bikeway and adjacent vehicle traffic. The physical separation may include flexible posts, grade separation, inflexible physical barriers or on-street parking. Separated bikeways generally operate in the same direction as vehicle traffic on the same side of the roadway. However, two-way separation bikeways can also be used, usually in lower speed environments ( 35 miles per hour or less).

Currently, bikeway facilities separated from vehicular traffic in American Canyon include a network of recreational pathways located throughout the community in City parks and on the American Canyon Creek corridor, a north- south Class I Multi-use Path along Flosden Road and Newell Drive, and a Bay Trail pathway on Wetlands Edge Road. Class II bike lanes are provided on Elliot Drive, Broadway Street, Benton Way, Donaldson Way, American Canyon Road, and Kimberly Drive. Connecting gaps in the planned trail network is a high priority for the City.

Bicycle Plan
The City adopted a Bicycle Plan in 2020 ( Resolution 2020- 11) which is incorporated into the General Plan as Appendix 4-1. The Bicycle Plan was prepared by the NVTA in accordance with the California Bicycle Transportation Act as part of the Napa Countywide Bicycle Plan. The plan was coordinated with extensive public outreach and existing City and Regional Plans at the time of its adoption. The Bicycle Plan adoption was one of several City actions implementing SB 375, the Sustainable Communities Strategy Act. MOB- Figure 9 shows the Bikeway Plan map.

Example of a Class IV Separated Bikeway
311

4. MOBILITY
Mobility Element | November 2025 | M-23
MOB- Figure 9: Bikeway Plan Map
312
M-24 | Mobility Element | November 2025
Pedestrian Plan
The City adopted a Pedestrian Master Plan into the General Plan in 2017 Resolution 2017- 42) which is incorporated into the General Plan as Appendix 4-2. The Pedestiran Plan was prepared by the NVTA in accordance with the Caltrans Active Transportation Program ( ATP) Guidelines, which outline statewide requirements for what should be included in active transportation plans. Together with the Bicycle Plan, the Pedestrian Plan creates an Active Transportation Plan that will position American Canyon to effectively compete for project funding. MOB- Figure 10 shows the Pedestrian Plan Priority Improvements map.
313

4. MOBILITY
Mobility Element | November 2025 | M-25
MOB- Figure 10: Pedestrian Plan Priority Improvements Map 314
M-26 | Mobility Element | November 2025
Planned Street Network
Improvements
To provide complete streets and correlate existing and planned land uses within the city, mobility improvements will be needed. Major street improvement locations are summarized on MOB- Table 3.

MOB-Table 3: Major Circulation Improvements
Street
From
South or East)
To
North or West)
Classification
State Route 29 Southern City
Limits
Northern City
Limits
See NVTA PID
Report
Newell Drive Rio Del Mar SR 29/ Green
Island Road
2-Lane Major
Collector
S. Kelly Road Paoli Loop N. Kelly Road 2-Lane Major
Collector
Newell Drive Donaldson Way Rio Del Mar 4-Lane Arterial
Green Island Road Western Terminus Easter Terminus 3-Lane Arterial West Side Connector Commerce
Boulevard
Hess Drive 2-Lane Major
Collector
Eucalyptus Drive Theresa Avenue SR 29 2-Lane Major
Collector
Rio Del Mar or South Napa
Junction Road ( includes
new at-grade railroad
crossing)
SR 29 Newell Drive 2-Lane Major
Collector
Napa Junction Road Western Terminus Theresa Avenue 2-Lane Minor Collector
Newell Drive Railroad
Overcrossing
South of Railroad North of
Railroad
2-Lane Arterial
Bridge
Structure
American Canyon Road
Pedestrian Crossing
East of SR 29 West of SR 29 Pedestrian
Grade
Separated
Crossing
Donaldson Way Pedestrian
Crossing
East of SR 29 West of SR 29 Pedestrian
Grade
Separated
Crossing
Napa Junction Road Pedestrian
Crossing
East of SR 29 West of SR 29 Pedestrian
Grade
Separated
Crossing
Source: City of American Canyon
315

4. MOBILITY
Mobility Element | November 2025 | M-27
Goals and Policies1
Goal MOB-1:

Provide safe and convenient access throughout the community with a citywide network of complete streets that meet the needs of all users and reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT).

Policies
MOB-1.1: Complete Streets. Maintain and update street standards that that serve not just automobile operations, but also multi- modal movement and adjacent land uses, including pedestrians, motorists, bicyclists, and transit riders of all ages and abilities, in a form that is compatible with and complementary to
adjacent land uses, and promotes connectivity between uses and areas.

MOB-1.2: Complete Street Standards. Review current arterial, collector, and local street standards and update as necessary to conform to best practice classification standards and NACTO complete streets guidelines.

MOB- 1.3: Street Design Standard Exceptions. Consider exceptions to adopted street standards by the City Engineer subject to substantial evidence included in an Engineering Design
Standard Exception application.

MOB- 1.4: Development Review. Evaluate new development to ensure that the safety, comfort, and convenience of pedestrians, bicyclists and transit users are given an equal or greater level of consideration to motor vehicle operators.

MOB-1.5: Sidewalks. Require sidewalks on all arterial and collector streets. Where feasible, separate sidewalks from streets on arterials and collectors with landscaping including a tree canopy to create shade.
1 Sustainable policies are noted with a green leaf.
316
M-28 | Mobility Element | November 2025
MOB-1.6: Transportation Facility Construction and Modification. When constructing or modifying transportation facilities, strive to provide for the movement of vehicles, commercial trucks, alternative and low energy vehicles, transit, bicyclists, and pedestrians appropriate for the road classification and adjacent land use.

MOB- 1.7: Promote Walking and Bicycling. Promote walking and bicycling for transportation, recreation, and improvement of public health and the environment.

MOB-1.8: Discourage SR 29 Traffic on City Streets. Design the city circulation system to discourage regional traffic from bypassing SR 29 and impacting City streets.

MOB-1.9: SR 29 Mobility. Work with regional partners, including Caltrans, NVTA, and other agencies to explore a complete streets
approach that will expand the travel capacity of SR 29 and establish a low-stress method for crossing for students walking and biking to school and other active transportation users.

MOB-1.10: Circulation System Design. Provide and maintain a circulation system that is correlated with planned land uses in the city and surrounding areas in the.

MOB- 1.11: Reduce the Need to Drive. Implement land use policies designed to create a pattern of activity that makes it easy to shop, play, visit friends, and conduct personal business without driving.

MOB-1.12: Neighborhood Context. Support safe, complete, and wellconnected neighborhood street, bicycle, and pedestrian access and connections that balance circulation needs with the neighborhood context.
317

4. MOBILITY
Mobility Element | November 2025 | M-29
MOB- 1.13: Multimodal Level of Service. Strive to achieve and maintain a Multimodal LOS D or better during peak hours recognizing that LOS D may not be achievable or cannot be maintained upon full buildout of the General Plan, due to traffic generated from sources beyond the control of the City. Locations that may not achieve or maintain LOS D and therefore will be exempt from the LOS D policy are: (1) Green Island Road; ( 2) Devlin Road; ( 3) American Canyon Road ( 4) Newell Drive; and (5) Flosden Road south of American Canyon Road.

MOB-1.14: Street Improvement Design. The street facility classifications indicated on the General Plan Circulation Map shall be the standard to which roads needing improvements are built to support the traffic generated by General Plan Land Use Element buildout and therefore represent the buildout standards to which a street segment or intersection shall be improved.

MOB- 1.15: Existing Facility Use. Make efficient use of existing transportation facilities and improve these facilities as necessary in accordance with the Circulation Map and NVTA Active Transportation Plan as it may be updated over time.

MOB-1.16: Agency Coordination. Coordinate with State, Regional, County, and neighboring agencies to ensure highway improvements e.g., SR 12, SR 29, and SR 37) appropriately consider impacts to American Canyon.

MOB-1.17: Reduce Vehicle Miles Traveled. Through layout of land uses, improve alternate travel modes, provide more direct routes for all modes of travel, and strive to reduce total vehicle miles traveled by city- and non-residents traveling to American Canyon to work or shop.

MOB-1.18: Circulation System Enhancements. Achieve, maintain, and improve mobility in the city in accordance with the Circulation Map, support multimodal travel of all users and goods, explore creative circulation system enhancements that increase system capacity, and consider improvements in addition to those identified on the Circulation Map, where feasible and
appropriate.
318
M-30 | Mobility Element | November 2025
MOB-1.19: Financing Program. Maintain a transportation financing program that will fund to the greatest extent feasible the planned transportation network consistent with the General Plan, including Transportation Impact Fee (TIF) program funding consistent with AB 1600.

MOB-1.20: Bicycle Plan Funding. Include funding for the City' s Bicycle Plan updates and bikeway improvements consistent with the Bicycle Plan in the City' s transportation financing program and TIF, recognizing the multi- modal travel needs of the City.

MOB-1.21: Address Mobility Needs. Recognize and meet the mobility needs of people using wheelchairs and those with other
mobility limitations.

MOB-1.22: Non-motorized Circulation System. Provide safe, low-stress, and direct pedestrian routes and bikeways between places.

MOB- 1.23: Pedestrian Connections to Employment Destinations.

Encourage the development of a network of continuous
walkways within new commercial, town center, public, and industrial uses to improve workers' ability to walk safely around, to, and from their workplaces. Where possible, route
pedestrians to grade separated crossings over SR 29.

MOB- 1.24: Bicycle Facilities. Bicycle facilities shall be provided to complete a continuous low stress bikeway system, consistent with adopted bikeway standards, as shown on the current Bikeway Plan Map. Deviations from adopted bikeway standards shall be permitted with the approval of the City Engineer. Deviations from the routing shown on the adopted bikeway diagram shall be permitted with the approval of the City Council.

MOB- 1.25: Street Trees. Ensure that street tree plans consider shade and comfort for pedestrians and bicyclists and traffic calming benefits.

MOB- 1.26: Universal Design. Provide pedestrian facilities that are accessible to people with disabilities and ensure that roadway improvement projects address accessibility by using universal design concepts such as bus pullouts and shelters, street lighting, and curbside management features such as
pickup/ drop-off locations for shared ride/ transit network 319

4. MOBILITY
Mobility Element | November 2025 | M-31
companies and spaces for delivery vehicles to park safely for short durations.

MOB- 1.27: Sustainable Roadway Expansion. Monitor the effects of roadway expansion on air, noise, seismic and archeological resources, and nesting habitat.

MOB- 1.28: Coordination with Adjacent Jurisdictions. Coordinate with adjacent jurisdictions to ensure connected and consistent nonvehicular facilities, including bridges, grade- separate crossings, as appropriate.
320
M-32 | Mobility Element | November 2025
Goal MOB-2:

A safe transportation system that eliminates traffic-related fatalities and reduces non-fatal injury collisions.

Policies
MOB-2.1: Vision Zero. Strive for the elimination of all traffic fatalities and severe injuries while increasing safe, healthy, and equitable mobility for all.

MOB- 2.2: Context Sensitive Design. Apply a context sensitive design lens to improve multimodal transportation safety by expanding the City’ s non-motorized transportation infrastructure.

MOB- 2.3: Bicycle Facilities Maintenance. Increase the safety of bicycle travel by sweeping debris from and repairing bicycle paths and lanes and repairing and restriping worn or damaged surface facilities.

MOB-2.4: Improved Bikeway Visibility. Consistent with evolving best practices, upgrade existing bikeways using all means available, such as conflict markings, buffers, rumble strips, and
delineators. Use visual cues, such as brightly colored paint on bike lanes or a one-foot painted buffer strip, along bicycle routes to provide a visual signal to drivers to watch out for bicyclists. Nurture a "share the lane" ethic, prioritizing bikeways with recent automobile- bicycle collisions and those that are routes to school.

MOB- 2.5: Speeds on Residential, Collector, and Arterial Streets.

Implement the current Traffic Calming Program to reduce vehicular speeds through residential neighborhoods with evidence- based best practices, such as enhanced crosswalks, lighted crosswalks, speed cushions, reduced lane widths, and others.

MOB- 2.6: Site Designs and Safety. Ensure, through the development review process, that development projects follow best design practices to reduce conflicts between multiple travel modes.

MOB- 2.7: Stakeholder Partners. Partner with public, nonprofit, and community stakeholders to secure dedicated funding for the education and infrastructure needs of the Countywide Safe 321

4. MOBILITY
Mobility Element | November 2025 | M-33
Routes To School Partnership to provide safe and equitable access for students going by active transportation to local schools.

MOB-2.8: Bicycle Friendly Community. Obtain resources to assist with improving bicycle facilities and education for people of all ages and abilities by securing and maintaining status as a Bicycle Friendly Community awarded by the National League of
American Bicyclists.

Goal MOB-3:

Support safe evacuation routes in the event of an emergency.

Policies
MOB-3.1: Parallel North-South Roadway. Prioritize construction of roadways that provide alternate vehicle access parallel to SR 29 through American Canyon and coordinate continuation of
parallel routes outside the city with regional agencies.

MOB- 3.2: Evacuation Routes. Identify important roadways that would serve as evacuation routes in the event of an emergency.

MOB-3.3: Natural Hazard Awareness Week. Coordinate with the American Canyon Fire Protection District to conduct outreach to the community on emergency evacuation routes in the city.

MOB- 3.4: Evacuation Route Obstacles. Evaluate potential physical conditions that could impede an evaluation route, including overhead utility poles, dead or dying trees, and aging
infrastructure.
322
M-34 | Mobility Element | November 2025
Goal MOB-4:

Support mobility programs that reduce reliance on fossil fuel.

Policies
MOB- 4.1: Transit Electrification. Support NVTA in its efforts to electrify the transit fleet.

MOB- 4.2: Municipal Fleet. Prepare a plan to systematically replace the City’s vehicle fleet to electric vehicles.

MOB-4.3: Effects of New Technologies. Monitor and evaluate the development of convenient new electric mobility technologies e.g., scootershare and bikeshare).

MOB-4.4: Expand Electric Charging Stations. Evaluate regulatory and incentivized processes and funding mechanisms to streamline installation of new electric vehicle charging stations at the lowest possible cost.

Source: NVTA
323

4. MOBILITY
Mobility Element | November 2025 | M-35
Public Transportation
American Canyon has a variety of public transportation options including fixed route systems and demand- responsive systems as well as local systems and regional systems.

American Canyon Transit
American Canyon Transit ( ACT), part of the Napa County Transit ( VINE) network operated by the Napa Valley Transportation Authority ( NVTA), provides weekday bus service on a 90-minute loop between 7:30 AM and 6:00 PM. ACT operates one main route served by two buses— ACT- 1 and ACT- 2—as well as a peak service route in the morning. ACT buses may deviate from their scheduled routes to provide on-demand service for seniors and individuals with disabilities, as time permits.

ACT- 1 (Southbound) begins service at 6:00 AM on weekdays from the ACT stop on Main Street next to Wal-Mart. It travels southbound via Rio Del Mar and Donaldson Way ( shown as the blue route on MOB- Figure 5).

ACT- 2 (Northbound) starts service at 10:00 AM on weekdays from the ACT stop at James Street and Crawford Way. It travels east on Donaldson Way and then south on Shenandoah ( blue route on MOBFigure 6).

The AM Peak Service includes two morning loops:

1. The first departs the Wal-Mart bus stop at 7:25 AM.

2. The second departs from the Rio Del Mar/ Eucalyptus ( 7-Eleven) stop.

This Peak Service is designated as the “ American Canyon High School” route, which is identified on the front of the bus (green route on MOB-Figure 6).

VINE
VINE provides transit services throughout Napa County, complementing ACT routes by connecting American Canyon with neighboring cities. Within the city, two routes—Route 10 and VINE 29—offer local stops.

Route 10 (shown in purple on MOB- Figure 6) runs between Napa Valley College in the city of Napa and the city of Vallejo. In American Canyon, 324
M-36 | Mobility Element | November 2025
it stops at SR 29/ Rio Del Mar and the American Canyon Active Adults Center on Elliot Drive between Knightsbridge Way and Kimberly Drive.

VINE 29 (yellow route on MOB- Figure 6) is a commuter express line that runs from Calistoga to the El Cerrito Del Norte BART station and the Vallejo Ferry Terminal. In American Canyon, it stops at the Post Office at SR 29 and Crawford Way.

Both routes operate throughout the week. Additionally, VINE Go offers doorto-door service for eligible seniors and disabled individuals.

Goals and Policies
Goal MOB-5:

Support increased public transit to improve mobility, improve air quality, and support efforts to reduce vehicle miles traveled ( VMT).

Policies
MOB-5.1: VMT Thresholds. Maintain and periodically reevaluate established vehicle miles traveled ( VMT) thresholds and Transportation Demand Management ( TDM) mitigation
requirements for the purposes of environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA). Continue to maintain LOS standards for the purposes of planning and designing street improvements on Green Island Road, Devlin Road, and American Canyon Road.

MOB- 5.2: Existing Transportation Demand Management Efforts.

Continue to support the implementation of existing local and regional efforts to manage traffic demand, such as the Napa Logistics Park trip monitoring program, and employer TDM provisions of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District BAAQMD).

MOB- 5.3: Support Transit Operation Improvements. Work with NVTA to expand both ACT and VINE fixed route services, improve
operations, and support dedicated bus lanes and/ or queuejump lanes on SR 29 to enhance bus operations by reducing travel time for transit vehicles.
325

4. MOBILITY
Mobility Element | November 2025 | M-37
MOB- 5.4: Demand- Responsive Transit. Support NVTA’ s demand responsive transit system.

MOB- 5.5: Transit Stops. Work with NVTA to situate transit stops at locations that are convenient for transit users and promote increased transit ridership through the provision of shelters, benches, bike racks on buses, and other amenities.

MOB-5.6: Transit Service Funding. Encourage NVTA to continue to pursue Federal and State funds to subsidize capital and operating costs associated with transit operation in the city.

MOB-5.7: Future Transit Links. Consider orienting transit system expansion to link with other potential future commuter bus and/ or rail services.

MOB- 5.8: Transit Services Marketing. Support NVTA efforts to encourage ridership on public transit systems through marketing and promotional efforts. Provide information to residents and employees on transit services available for local and regional trips.

MOB- 5.9: Support VINE Services. Continue to support the VINE service provided by NVTA.

MOB-5.10: Transit Supportive Development. Ensure that new development is designed to make transit a viable transportation choice for residents, including neighborhood centers or focal points with sheltered bus stops; locating medium and highdensity development on or near streets served by transit wherever feasible; and link neighborhoods to bus stops by continuous sidewalks or pedestrian paths.

MOB- 5.11: Transit for Seniors. Require new community care facilities and senior housing projects with over 25 beds to provide accessible transportation services for the convenience of residents.

MOB- 5.12: SB 375 Implementation. Coordinate with other agencies to implement regional transit solutions as part of the SB 375 Sustainable Communities Strategy.

MOB- 5.13: Park and Ride Facilities. Continue to encourage additional regional public transportation services and support facilities, such as park and ride lots near Broadway ( SR- 29).
326
M-38 | Mobility Element | November 2025
MOB-5.14: Effects of New Technologies on Transit Use. Monitor and evaluate the development of new mobility technologies ( such as rideshare, microtransit, and potentially commuter rail transit) and the potential effects on transit demand and the way users access public transit.

Goods Movement
Truck Routes
Truck routes are designed to accommodate heavy commercial, industrial, and agricultural vehicles while minimizing disruptions to local traffic and reducing impacts on residential neighborhoods. Given the significant existing and anticipated light industrial activity in the city’s northwest quadrant, it is important to clearly designate truck routes to prevent heavy vehicle intrusion into residential areas.

Green Island Road and SR 29 are the city’s designated truck routes. SR 29 currently carries substantial truck traffic and is classified as a terminal access route under the federal Surface Transportation Assistance Act (STAA). Enacted in 1982, the STAA established size and access standards for large trucks— known as STAA trucks—on the National Network, which includes the Interstate System and designated roadways like SR 29.

Rail Transport
Rail transportation in the American Canyon is limited to freight service only. The main rail line is owned by Union Pacific Railroad Company and enters the city from the city of Vallejo parallel to and on the east side of SR 29.

The rail line continues on this trajectory diverting from the SR 29 alignment north of American Canyon Road. North of Napa Junction Road, the railroad line splits into three segments:

One segment heads northeast parallel to Jameson Canyon Road towards the city of Fairfield.

Another segment heads northwest under SR 29 and across Green Island Road toward the city of Sonoma.
327

4. MOBILITY
Mobility Element | November 2025 | M-39
The third leg heads north past Napa County Airport, terminating just north of Kennedy Park in the city of Napa. This leg connects to the Napa Valley Wine Train.

The Napa Valley Railroad operates a tourist-oriented passenger train service between the cities of Napa and St. Helena. The Wine Train makes multiple round trips per day between the two cities.

In 2003, the NVTA studied potential passenger rail service from the Vallejo Ferry Terminal north to St. Helena or Calistoga. The Napa/ Solano Passenger/ Freight Rail Study concluded that passenger rail service could be feasible. However, the service would require a significant subsidy with no current funding source.

In 2019, Sonoma- Marin Area Rail Transit ( SMART) completed a Passenger Rail Service Feasibility Study for a 41-mile Novato to Suisun City corridor. This study determined that this corridor is feasible for passenger rail including a potential rail station in American Canyon.

Goals and Policies
Goal MOB-6:

Efficient and safe transport of goods by truck and rail.

Policies
MOB-6.1: Promote Safe and Efficient Goods Movement. Promote the safe and efficient movement of goods via truck and rail with minimum disruptions to residential areas.

MOB-6.2: Promote Railroad Safety. Maintain safe railroad crossings by coordinating road improvements at rail crossings with the California Public Utilities Commission.

MOB- 6.3: Passenger Rail Service. Encourage regional transit agencies to evaluate passenger rail service with a station in American Canyon.

MOB- 6.4: Location of Industrial Development. Continue industrial expansion in the north industrial area to minimize the
neighborhood impacts of truck movements.
328
M-40 | Mobility Element | November 2025
MOB-6.5: Secure Truck Parking. Encourage high-security off-street parking for tractor-trailer rigs in industrial designated areas.

MOB- 6.6: Goods Movement Along City Arterials. Continue to restrict truck traffic through the city to its arterial roadways in order to facilitate goods movement to regional facilities; continue to prohibit truck traffic on residential streets.

MOB- 6.7: Truck Route Signage. Ensure that clear signage is provided from regional gateways to truck routes in the city.

MOB-6.8: Truck Route Design. Incorporate provisions for trucks in the design of industrial collector streets and other designated truck routes. Ensure that truck routes are designed according to California and, where appropriate, STAA standards for
intersections and turning movements.

MOB-6.9: Effects of New Technologies on Goods Movement. Monitor and evaluate the development of new technologies and trends such as e-commerce) and the potential effects on the goods movement network ( including increased curbside loading demand).

Goal MOB-7:

Improve the mobility system with fiscally-sound financing methods.

Policies
MOB- 7.1: Funding Sources. Leverage existing available funding methods and sources to fund the transportation system in American Canyon while also researching innovative funding sources at the Federal, State, regional, and county levels.

MOB-7.2: New Development. Ensure new development projects contribute their fair share to transportation network
improvements and that existing funding commitments are met.

MOB-7.3: Monitor Funding. Monitor fee programs and regular funding mechanisms to ensure adequate funding for programmed
transportation improvements.
329

4. MOBILITY
Mobility Element | November 2025 | M-41
MOB- 7.4: Regional Funding. Maintain standards to qualify for regional transportation revenues and engage regional agencies to provide adequate transportation funding to local jurisdictions.

SR29 American Canyon Multimodal Improvement Project Photosimulation Source: NVTA
330
M-42 | Mobility Element | November 2025
Implementation Programs
Programs
Implements
Which
Policy( ies)
Responsible
Supporting
Department( s) 20
2 5
20 30
20 31
20 3
5 20
3 6 –
20 4
0 An
n
u
a
l
On
g
o
i
n
g
A Capital Improvement Program
Update the Capital Improvement Program
annaually to incorporate necessary circulation
system improvements.

MOB- 1.1
MOB - 1.2
MOB - 1.7
MOB - 1.8
MOB - 1.9
MOB - 1.13
MOB - 1.18
MOB - 1.19
Public Works
City Manager
B Update Street Standards
Update the City’ s street standards based on the
complete streets guidelines published by the
National Association of City Transportation
Officials ( NACTO).

MOB - 1.1
MOB - 1.2
Public Works
C Active Transportation Plan
Prepare and update every five years an Active
Transportation Plan to replace the Bicyle
Master Plan and include pedestrian faclities.

The Plan should include a full range of facilities
for bicycle travel, including Class I bike/ multiuse
paths, Class II bike lanes, Class Ill bike routes,
and Class IV separated bikeway to provide a
continuous system of bikeways trhoughout the
city.

MOB - 1.6
MOB - 1.19
MOB - 1.22
MOB - 1.23
Public Works
D Update Transportation Impact Analysis ( TIA)
Guidelines
Update and adopt Transportation Impact
Analysis ( TIA) guidelines to include VMT and a
Multimodal LOS assessment methodology for
the evaluation of potential transportation
impacts resulting from new development.

MOB - 1.2
MOB - 1.3
Pbulic Works
E Transportation Impact Fee
Maintain and update the transportation impact
fee (TIF) program consistent with AB 1600.

MOB - 1.18 Public Works
F Active Transportation Funding
Annually allocate TIF funds for the Active
Transportation Plan updates and bikeway
design and improvements consistent with the
Active Transportation Plan implementation
program.

MOB - 1.18
MOB - 1.19
Public Works
G Bicycle Use by City Employees
Establish a program to encourage bicycle use
among City employees.

MOB - 1.6 Public Works
331

4. MOBILITY
Mobility Element | November 2025| M-43
Programs
Implements
Which
Policy( ies)
Responsible
Supporting
Department( s) 20
2 5
20 30
20 31
20 3
5 20
3 6 –
20 4
0 An
n
u
a
l
On
g
o
i
n
g
H Bicyle Facility Development and Maintenance
Prepare and update every five years a bike
facility development and maintenance program
that includes the following provisions:
signage consistent with according to
Caltrans or City standards
lighting where needed;
bicycle paths and lanes on bridges and
overpasses;
bicycle- safe drainage grates;
bikeways free of hazards such as
uneven pavement or gravel;
merging or crossing signage where bike
routes and paths make transitions into
or across roadways;
promoting classes on bicycle safety in
the schools in coordination with the
Napa Valley Unified School District;
and
sweeping debris from and repairing
bicycle paths and lanes)
MOB - 1.12
MOB - 1.17
MOB - 1.19
MOB - 2.3
MOB - 2.4
Public Works
I
Reserved
J Pedestrian Crosswalk Installation
Install clearly marked crosswalks at
intersections near all commercial uses, as well
as clearly marked pedestrian paths within
parking areas. While mid- block crossings are
discouraged, if conditions warrant and are
approved by City Engineer, crosswalks and
signage indicating pedestrian activity should be
installed at mid- block entrances where existing
commercial uses are adjacent to other highintensity uses, such as parks and schools where necessary for safety. Where possible,
pedestrians should be roiuted to grade
separated crossings over State Route 29.

MOB - 1.6
MOB - 1.22
Public Works
K Pedestrian Connections to Schools
Continue developing the existing network of
walkways between schools and residential uses,
and encourage the development of new
continuous walkways between schools and
residential uses. Where possible, route
pedestrians to grade separated crossings over
SR 29.

MOB - 1.6
MOB - 1.21
Public Works
332
M-44 | Mobility Element | November 2025
Programs
Implements
Which
Policy(ies)
Responsible
Supporting
Department( s) 20
2 5
20 30
20 31
20 3
5 20
3 6 –
20 4
0 An
n
u
a
l
On
g
o
i
n
g
L Vision Zero
Prepare and update every five years a Vision
Zero program and install safety
countermeasures consistent with the results
and recommendations of the Local Roadway
Safeway Plan ( LRSP).

MOB - 2.1
MOB - 2.2
MOB - 2.2
MOB - 2.4
Public Works
M Truck Facilities Financing
Prepare an analysis of possible funding sources,
including user fees, to help finance truck routes
and truck parking areas.

MOB - 4-1
MOB - 4.2
MOB - 4-3
MOB - 4.4
Public Works
N Railroad Crossing Safety Program
Continue the ongoing comprehensive program
to improve the condition and safety of existing
railroad crossings by upgrading surface
conditions and installing signs and signals where
warranted. Participate in railroad safety
education, such as Operation Lifesaver activities
when offered.

MOB - 4-1
MOB - 4.2
Public Works
O New Railroad Crossings
Provide new crossings across the railroad
UPRR) in conjunction with the planned
roadway improvements shown on the
Circulation System map to ensure at least one
cross- town route is maintained in case rail
activity interrupts local and regional traffic flow
and/ or emergency access. New crossings will be
at Newell Drive ( grade separated); and Rio Del
Mar or South Napa Junction Road ( initially atgrade, may be grade separated in the future).

MOB - 4-1
MOB - 4.2
Public Works
333
Local Roadway
Safety Plan
Final Document
City of American Canyon
August 16, 2022
334

REPORT SIGNATURE SHEET
This Local Road Safety Plan for the City of American Canyon has been prepared under the direction of the following Professional Engineer. The Registered Civil Engineer attests to the technical information contained herein and the engineering data upon which recommendations, conclusions, and decisions are based.

Kathryn Savoy Kleinschmidt, PE
Registered Civil Engineer
August 16, 2022
Date
03/31/24
C93262
Kathryn Savoy Kleinschmidt
335
City of American Canyon Local Roadway Safety Plan | Final i Acknowledgements
A special thanks to all the Safety Partners that contributed to this plan.

City of American Canyon
Public Works Department
City Council
Planning Commission
Napa County
Public Works
Caltrans, District 4
American Canyon Police Department
American Canyon Fire Protection District
Napa Valley Transportation Authority
Napa County Bicycle Coalition
Napa Valley Unified School District
Napa County Office of Education
336
City of American Canyon Local Roadway Safety Plan | Final ii Executive Summary
A Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) is a data driven traffic safety planning document that is now a requirement for Cycle 11 of the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP). The goal of the LRSP is overall road safety improvements with an emphasis on reducing fatal and severe injury collisions. This plan also involves input from stakeholders and the public in identifying priority locations that could benefit from safety improvements but might not currently show a collision issue. This comprehensive plan is focused on mitigating the City of American Canyon (City) primary collision types and factors, with an overall reduction in collisions citywide.

The development of American Canyon’s LRSP was a collaborative process with a local leadership group that represents the 5 E’s (not just engineering) and public outreach. The 5 E’s of traffic safety include Engineering, Enforcement, Education, Emergency Response, and Emerging Technologies.

This holistic approach allows certain areas of concern not showing a crash pattern to be analyzed. Also, it fosters local, state, and agency partnerships to advance local road safety.

In following the overall LRSP process, a Stakeholder Working Group (Working Group) was formed with the City as the lead and local organizations from the 5 E’s and anyone with an interest in improving the City’s roadway safety. This group gathered for meetings to discuss the overall collision analysis, goals, priorities, safety recommendations, and overall development of the safety plan.

Based on the past 5 years’ collision analysis and the City’s Stakeholder Working Group Meetings, this LRSP will address multiple Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) Challenge/Emphasis Areas including but not limited to:

Pedestrians
Bicyclists
Intersections
Aggressive Driving/Speeding
Distracted Driving
In addition, the vision, mission statement, and goals were established in guiding the development of the LRSP. It was also decided that the LRSP for the City of American Canyon would be a living document with official updates every five (5) years.

Data analysis, public input, and City feedback helped to determine the priority locations in the City. State Route 29 SR 29) runs at grade through American Canyon and divides the east and west sides of the City. These locations have been separated from the City jurisdiction intersections. All the locations, along with their proposed countermeasures per Caltrans Local Roadway Safety Manual for HSIP grant funding, are shown in the tables below. 337
City of American Canyon Local Roadway Safety Plan | Final iii Priority Intersections and Recommended Countermeasures
Intersection Recommended Countermeasures
Improve sight distance to intersection (Clear Sight Triangles) Install pedestrian crossing at uncontrolled locations ( new signs and markings only) Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Improve signal timing ( coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval ( LPI) Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) Rio Del Mar and Los Altos Pl Evaluate conversion of intersection to mini-roundabout Improve signal hardware: lenses, back- plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) Install high visibility yellow school crosswalk striping Relocate existing school crossing
Install/upgrade pedestrian crossing at uncontrolled locations (with enhanced safety features)
Caltrans Jurisdiction*
Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) SR 29 and Napa Junction Rd Improve signal timing ( coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) SR 29 and Donaldson Way Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Install signage for traffic merging onto SR 29
Only low- cost countermeasures considered. Larger corridor improvements planned and anticipated to begin construction in FY 2025/26 City Jurisdiction
Flosden Rd and Daniel Dr
American Canyon Rd and Broadway/Silver Oak Trail
American Canyon Rd and Newell Dr/Flosden Rd
Flosden Rd and Canyon Creek Dr
Flosden Rd and Via Bellagio
American Canyon Rd and Via Firenze
SR 29 and American Canyon Rd
Rio Del Mar and Rio Grande
SR 29 and Rio Del Mar
SR 29 and Eucalyptus Dr
SR 29 / Green Island Rd
338
City of American Canyon Local Roadway Safety Plan | Final iv Priority Segments and Recommended Countermeasures
Recommended Systemic Countermeasures
Segment Recommended Countermeasures
Newell Dr (Silver Oak Trail to American Canyon Rd) Install dynamic/ variable speed warning signs Install dynamic/ variable speed warning signs
Install guardrail
Install delineators, reflectors and/or object markers
Repair and paint (retroreflective) median end caps
Install dynamic/ variable speed warning signs
Install centerline rumble strips/stripes
Install dynamic/ variable speed warning signs
Install delineators, reflectors and/or object markers
Install dynamic/ variable speed warning signs
Install delineators, reflectors and/or object markers
Install dynamic/ variable speed warning signs
Install pedestrian crossing (with enhanced safety features) Install dynamic/ variable speed warning signs
Install pedestrian crossing (with enhanced safety features) Caltrans Jurisdiction*
Add segment lighting
Install dynamic/ variable speed warning signs
Add segment lighting
Install dynamic/ variable speed warning signs
Add segment lighting
Install dynamic/ variable speed warning signs
Add segment lighting
Install dynamic/ variable speed warning signs
Add segment lighting
Install dynamic/ variable speed warning signs
Only low- cost countermeasures considered. Larger corridor improvements planned and anticipated to begin construction in FY 2025/26 American Canyon Rd (Newell Dr to E City Limit)
SR 29 (Rio Del Mar to Donaldson Way)
SR 29 (Donaldson Way to American Canyon Rd)
SR 29 (Napa Junction Rd to Rio Del Mar)
Paoli Loop Rd (SR 29 to SR 29 Overpass)
Flosden Rd (Daniel Dr to S City Limit)
American Canyon Rd (Silver Oak Trail to Newell Dr)
SR 29 (American Canyon Rd to S City Limit)
SR 29 (Green Island Rd to Napa Junction Rd)
Silver Oak Trail (American Canyon Rd to Newell Dr)
Benton Way (Wetlands Edge Rd to Donaldson Way/Elliott Dr) City Jurisdiction
Type of
Location C t Countermeasure
oun ermeasure
Citywi de
Educati on
Educati on
Educati on
Enforce ment
Engin eering
Engin eering
Engin eering
Engin eering
Engin eering
Engin eering
Engin eering
Pedestrian and bic ycle edu cation
campai gn (cross ing at crosswalks ,
wearing high-visibility clothin g at night,
followi ng the bicycle rules of the road etc .)
Safe driver educati on for all drivers
Safe driving campai gn for students
Speed en forcement and m anagement2
Install bike infrast ru cture
1 Add sidewalks/ close sidew alk gaps
Pedes trian Crossing Enhancements 1
Pro.; de pedest rian countdown timers ,
updated push buttons , AND Leadin g
Pedes trian Intervals ( LPIs ) at signalized
intersections (as needed)
Flashing Yellow Arrows/ Protected Left
Tum signal heads at signalized
intersections
Evalu te installation of green bik e confli ct
markings at intersections 1
Evalu te adding bike boxes at
intersection s
1 1
Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements and Bike Safety Improvements are part of the HSIP Set Aside funding and do not require previous collis ion history 2 Speed Management can include the ins tallation oftraffic calming devices and/or speed limit cl1anges through AB 43
339
City of American Canyon Local Roadway Safety Plan | Final v It is important to understand the upcoming funding opportunities in the successful implementation of these safety projects. Most of the proposed countermeasures are HSIP fundable ( Cycle 11 opened May 9, 2022). However, countermeasures can be implemented through other funding sources including:

Active Transportation Program (ATP)
Next call for funding projects is scheduled to start in March 2024 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) program
Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant (Sustainable Communities) Stimulus funding sources
Capital Improvement Program or with on-going maintenance work 340
City of American Canyon Local Roadway Safety Plan | Final vi Contents

1. Introduction 2

2. Background 3

2.1 Purpose and Need 3

2.1.1 City Roadways 3

2.2 Standards and Guidelines 5

2.2.1 California Strategic Highway Safety Plan 5

2.3 Methodology 5

3. Safety Partners/Stakeholders 7

3.1 Stakeholder Working Group Members 7

3.1.1 Stakeholder Working Group Meetings 7

3.2 SHSP Challenge Areas 8

3.3 Guiding Principles 8

3.3.1 Vision Zero 8

3.3.2 Safe Systems Approach 8

3.3.3 Vision, Mission Statement, and Goals 9

3.3.3.1 Vision 9

3.3.3.2 Mission Statement 10

3.3.3.3 Goals 10

3.3.3.4 Motto and Pledge 10

4. Analyze Safety Data 11

4.1 Recent/Planned Safety Projects 11

4.1.1 American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 Proposed Projects 11

4.1.2 State Route 29 Multimodal Improvement Project 11

4.1.3 Other Projects 12

4.2 Collision Data 13

4.2.1 Collisions on City Roadways 15

4.2.1.1 Additional Locations 17

4.2.2 Collisions on Caltrans Roadways 17

4.2.3 Collisions Related to Challenge/Emphasis Areas 18

4.2.3.1 Pedestrians 18

4.2.3.2 Bicyclists 20

4.2.3.3 Intersections 22

4.2.3.4 Aggressive Driving / Speeding 22

4.2.3.5 Distracted Driving 22

5. Public Outreach 23

5.1 Public Website 23

5.1.1 Interactive Map 24

5.1.2 Public Survey 25

5.2 Public Engagement 25

6. Identify Strategies 26

6.1 Engineering Strategies 26

6.1.1 Intersection Projects 26

6.1.2 Segment Projects 28
341
City of American Canyon Local Roadway Safety Plan | Final vii

6.1.3 Systemic Safety Countermeasures 30

6.1.4 Active Transportation 30

6.2 Non-Engineering Strategies 31

7. Prioritize and Incorporate Strategies 32

7.1 Funding Sources 32

7.2 Prioritized Projects 32

8. Evaluation Process 35

9. Next Steps 36

10. References 37
Table Index
Table 4.1 Comprehensive Collision Costs and Equivalent Property Damage Only (EPDO) Weights (2020 dollars) 16
Table 4.2 Top Intersections on City Roadways, Per Collision Analysis 16 Table 4.3 Top Segments on City Roadways, Per Collision Analysis 17 Table 4.4 Top Intersections on Caltrans Roadways, Per Collision Analysis 17 Table 4.5 Top Segments on Caltrans Roadways, Per Collision Analysis 18 Table 4.6 Aggressive Driving Collisions on All Roadways (2017-2021) 22 Table 6.1 Priority Intersection Characteristics 26
Table 6.2 Recommended Countermeasures for Priority Intersections 27 Table 6.3 Priority Segments Characteristics 28
Table 6.4 Recommended Countermeasures for Priority Segments 29 Table 6.5 Systemic Countermeasures 30
Table 6.6 Non-Engineering Strategies 31
Table 7.1 Priority of City Intersection Projects 33
Table 7.2 Priority of City Segment Projects 34
Figure Index
Figure 1.1 California SHSP (2020-2024) 2
Figure 1.2 FHWA’s LRSP Development Process 2
Figure 2.1 Fatal and Severe Injury Collisions in the City of American Canyon (2017-2021) 4 Figure 2.2 SHSP Challenge Areas 5
Figure 2.3 FHWA’s LRSP Development Map (Source: Federal Highway Administration) 6 Figure 3.1 Safe Systems Approach 9
Figure 4.1 Proposed ARPA Funded Bike Lane and Intersection Improvement Project 11 Figure 4.2 SR 29 Roundabout Corridor Alternative 12
Figure 4.3 Total Collisions within the City of American Canyon (2017-2021) 13 Figure 4.4 Collision Density on All Roadways ( 2017-2021) 14 Figure 4.5 Summary of City Collisions ( 2017-2021) 15
Figure 4.6 Top Violation Categories on City Roadways ( 2017-2021) 15 342
City of American Canyon Local Roadway Safety Plan | Final viii Figure 4.7 Pedestrian Location at Time of Collision 18
Figure 4.8 Map of Pedestrian Collisions (2017-2021) 19
Figure 4.9 Bicycle Collision Types and Severity 20
Figure 4.10 Map of Bicycle Collisions (2017-2021) 21
Figure 4.11 Top 5 Violation Categories for Intersection Collisions 22 Figure 5.1 Public Website Home Page 23
Figure 5.2 Public Website Interactive Map 24
Figure 5.3 Public-Identified Roadway Issues 25
Appendices
Appendix A Stakeholder and Public Input
Appendix B Collision Data
343
City of American Canyon Local Roadway Safety Plan | Final ix List of Abbreviations
AASHTO American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials APS Accessible Pedestrian Signal
ATP Active Transportation Program or Plan
AWSC All-Way Stop Control
BCR Benefit to Cost Ratio
BUI Biking Under the Influence
CA MUTCD California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices CMAQ Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality
DUI Driving Under the Influence
EPDO Equivalent Property Damage Only
FHWA Federal Highway Administration
FSI Fatal or Severe Injury
HSIP Highway Safety Improvement Program
HSM Highway Safety Manual
LRSM Local Roadway Safety Manual
LRSP Local Roadway/ Road Safety Plan
SHSP Strategic Highway Safety Plan
SSAR Systemic Safety Analysis Report
SWITRS Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System
TIMS Transportation Injury Mapping System
TWSC Two-Way Stop Control
344
City of American Canyon Local Roadway Safety Plan | Final 2

1. Introduction
The project involves the development of a Local Roadway/ Road Safety Plan (LRSP), which provides local agencies an opportunity to address unique roadway safety needs in their jurisdictions. This comprehensive document will both help to guide the City in safety countermeasures and allow eligibility for funding in future HSIP applications. The process of preparing an LRSP creates a framework to systematically identify and analyze local safety problems and recommend engineering safety improvements for future Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) funding.

Preparing an LRSP facilitates local agency partnerships and collaboration, resulting in a prioritized list of improvements and actions that contribute to California’s Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) overall vision and goals. This SHSP focuses on reducing fatal and severe injury collisions ( FSI collisions) with focused challenge/ emphasis areas with a focus on the Five E’s” of Traffic Safety (see Figure 1.1).

The City and GHD will follow the Federal Highway
Administration’ s (FHWA) Local Road Safety process in the following six (6) steps as shown in Figure 1.2:

Figure 1.2 FHWA’ s LRSP Development Process
In working with the first step of establishing leadership, GHD and the City of American Canyon reached out to the various stakeholder representative for the LRSP working group in capturing the “5E’s” and local community members that can contribute to the overall safety plan for the City of American Canyon. This working group was key in developing a comprehensive safety plan that is tailored to address the local needs and issues.

Figure 1.1 California SHSP ( 2020- 2024)
THE FIVE " Es" OFTRAFFIC SAFETY

ENGINEERING

EDUCATION

EMERGING

TECHNOLOGIES

ENFORCEMENT

THE LRSP

DEVELOPMENT

PROCESS
0 Establish
Leadership
f)
Analyze
Safety Data
345
City of American Canyon Local Roadway Safety Plan | Final 3

2. Background

2.1 Purpose and Need
American Canyon is located at the southern tip of Napa Valley and serves as a gateway to wine country. The City lies approximately 40 miles northeast from San Francisco and has easy access to the San Francisco Bay Ferry located in Vallejo. Its population is approximately 22,000 as of the 2020 Census, up from approximately 20,000 in the 2010 Census. American Canyon is host to multiple recreational areas with the Newell Open Space Preserve in the east, the Napa River Bay Trail and Wetlands Edge Park in the west, and Eagle Vines and Chardonnay Golf Clubs to the north.

Additionally, Napa County Airport lies just north of the City near the industrial area.

With its recreational options, local wineries, and close proximity to both Napa Valley and San Francisco, American Canyon sees many different types of roadway users each day. State Route 29 runs through the City at grade and serves as a main thoroughfare for local and pass through traffic . In addition, the City of American Canyon roadways serve a variety of users including pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders, passenger cars, and heavy trucks for freight, with a mix of local, recreational, and regional trips.

In focusing in on the roadway safety needs, the past five years of collisions ( 2017-2021) were evaluated for City roadways and the high severity collisions are discussed below.

2.1.1 City Roadways
During the five-year period between 2017 and 2021, there were 2 fatal and 5 severe injury collisions recorded for the roadways under the City of American Canyon’s jurisdiction. There were 2 fatal and 10 severe injury collisions on SR

29. Figure 2.1 shows a map of the 4 fatal and 15 severe injury collisions on City and Caltrans roadways between 2017 and 2021. In improving roadway safety for the City of American Canyon, it is important to focus on mitigating these high injury and loss of life collisions.
346
City of American Canyon Local Roadway Safety Plan | Final 4 Figure 2.1 Fatal and Severe Injury Collisions in the City of American Canyon ( 2017-2021) Loeal. er.s ol <:a1rsrons a:-e fer v1Su31 rep-e!lenla!IO~ O!'l.'J.

Legend
Collision Severity
Fatal
Severe Injury
J City Lim its
347
City of American Canyon Local Roadway Safety Plan | Final 5

2.2 Standards and Guidelines
In developing the City of American Canyon LRSP, the following standards and guidelines were followed:

Local Roadway Safety, A Manual for California’ s Local Road Owners”, Caltrans, Version 1.6, April 2022. 2020-2024 California’ s Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP), “California Safe Roads: 2020-2024 Strategic Highway Safety Plan”, Caltrans.

Developing Safety Plans, A Manual for Local Rural Road Owners”, Federal Highway Administration, March 2012.

Highway Safety Manual”, American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHTO), 1st Edition, 2014 supplement.

California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD)”, Revision 5, 2014.

2.2.1 California Strategic Highway Safety Plan
The LRSP will complement California’ s SHSP 2020-2024. Per this plan, the recommended challenge areas are shown in Figure 2.2. This plan will focus on challenge/emphasis areas that are determined through data analysis and stakeholder input.

Figure 2.2 SHSP Challenge Areas
For HSIP Cycle 11, Caltrans has updated the SHSP Challenge Areas to incorporate speed management in conjunction with aggressive driving.

2.3 Methodology
The LRSP methodology followed the FHWA’s LRSP development process as shown in Figure 2.3.

Below is a roadmap created by the Federal Highway Administration to show the process of creating the Local Road Safety Plan. Here are the primary steps used to create this plan:

1. Identify Stakeholders
i) Working Group was formed of the 5 E’s and other interested representatives.

2. Use Safety Data
i) Past 5 years of collisions were analyzed with discussion of other high-risk locations.

3. Chose Proven Solutions

AGGRESS IVE DRI VING

AGING DRI VERS

BICYCLISTS

COMMERC IAL

VEHICLES
0 DISTRACTED DRIVING
u DRIVER LICENSING

A EMERGENCY

RESPONSE

EMERGING
v.., TECHNOLOGIES

IMPAI RED DRIV ING

INTERSECTIONS

LANE DEPARTURES

MOTORC YCLISTS

OCCUPANT

PROTECTION

PEDESTR IANS

WORK ZONES

YOUNG DR IVERS
348
City of American Canyon Local Roadway Safety Plan | Final 6 i) FHWA Proven Countermeasures and Caltrans safety countermeasures were used in mitigation collision trends and risk characteristics.

4. Implement Solutions
i) Projects were identified for specific location and systemically.

Figure 2.3 FHWA’ s LRSP Development Map ( Source: Federal Highway Administration) Local Road
Safetv Plans:

Your Mop roSofer Roadway.;
No matter what your resources. a local
Road Solely Plan wil guide you to
data- driven SO, utions and safer roads.
hNpt; ,, ofofyfh a.dot. gO' II prO'< leneount4H' ffl«nUt9' 1/JOCOI road/ Choose Provitn Solutions
4P) ~
Ctwvron, toundd: louh. ~~=~ nt Ctouwal<,
Identify Stakeholders
@ ~ ~ ~
fnrof~ ewmenl = EMS bl~d';
I , ..

Use Safely Data
i It) &.

Cl" Olihas MaltI~~~ c• i~ ~:!n,
Help C. People Home Safely
349
City of American Canyon Local Roadway Safety Plan | Final 7

3. Safety Partners/Stakeholders

3.1 Stakeholder Working Group Members
Based on community connections, the City of American Canyon led the formation of the LRSP Stakeholder Working Member Group. This leadership group was crucial in the development of the LRSP and helped in capturing the safety needs, goals, and priorities including safety countermeasures for the City of American Canyon.

The Stakeholder Working Group included the following representatives:

City of American Canyon
Napa County
Caltrans, District 4
American Canyon Police Department
American Canyon Fire Protection District
Napa Valley Transportation Authority
Napa County Bicycle Coalition
Napa Valley Unified School District
Napa County Office of Education

3.1.1 Stakeholder Working Group Meetings
Two meetings were held with the stakeholder working group and facilitated by GHD. The virtual meetings were as follows:

Tuesday, May 3, 2022 from 1 p.m. to 2:30 p.m.
o Discussed the LRSP overall process, working group member’ s safety priorities, past 5 years of collisions (City and Caltrans roadways), vision, goals, and priorities.

Thursday, June 16, 2022 from 2 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.
o Reviewed first meeting, discussed public comments and ways to address their concerns, recent developments, safety countermeasures and projects, refined LRSP’s guiding principles, and coordinated next steps.

The meeting agendas for the stakeholder working group meetings are in Appendix A: Stakeholder and Public Input.

The stakeholder working group provided their feedback and comments on the Draft Local Roadway Safety Plan document before the plan was finalized. With many of the safety countermeasures to include engineering, enforcement, and emergency response, it is important to have buy off from the stakeholders in understanding how the plan will be implemented.
350
City of American Canyon Local Roadway Safety Plan | Final 8

3.2 SHSP Challenge Areas
Based on the LRSP Working Group Meetings, this LRSP will address multiple Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) Challenge Areas including:

Pedestrians
Bicyclists
Intersections
Aggressive Driving/Speeding
Distracted Driving

3.3 Guiding Principles
The members of the working group coordinated to establish the vision, mission statement, and goals that guided the development of the document. Ideally, this document will help the City move toward Vision Zero. The aim of Vision Zero is to eliminate all traffic fatalities and severe injuries, while increasing safe, healthy, and equitable mobility for all.

Traditionally, traffic deaths and severe injuries have been considered as inevitable side effects of modern life. The reality is that these tragedies can be addressed over time by taking a proactive, preventative approach that prioritizes traffic safety as a public health issue.

3.3.1 Vision Zero
Vision Zero is a significant departure from the status quo in two major ways:

Vision Zero recognizes that people will sometimes make mistakes, so the road system and related policies should be designed to minimize those inevitable mistakes and reduce their likeliness to result in severe injuries or fatalities. This means that system designers and policymakers are expected to improve the roadway environment, policies (such as speed management), and other related systems to lessen the severity of crashes. Roadway users are however still responsible for their mistakes and should follow all applicable laws and use reasonable judgement when conducting themselves within the public right of way.

Vision Zero is a multidisciplinary approach, bringing together diverse and necessary stakeholders to address this complex problem. In the past, meaningful, cross-disciplinary collaboration among local traffic planners and engineers, policymakers, and public health professionals has not been the norm. Vision Zero acknowledges that many factors contribute to safe mobility -- including roadway design, speeds, behaviors, technology, and policies -- and sets clear goals to achieve the shared goal of zero fatalities and severe injuries.

3.3.2 Safe Systems Approach
The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is using the Safe System approach to work towards their goal of zero fatalities in vehicles. In providing a comprehensive approach to safety, the Safe System approach is to design our vehicles and infrastructure in a manner that anticipates human error and accommodates human tolerances with a goal of reducing fatal and serious injuries. The following framework is intended to assist the vehicle and infrastructure communities in making decisions in alignment with Safe System principles. Implementing and selecting safe system practices and design will incrementally improve safety over time.

FHWA defines the Safe System Approach Principles and Elements as follows:

Safe Road Users—The safety of all road users is equitably addressed, including those who walk, bike, drive, ride transit, or travel by other modes.

Safe Vehicles— Vehicles are designed and regulated to minimize the frequency and severity of collisions using safety measures that incorporate the latest technology. 351
City of American Canyon Local Roadway Safety Plan | Final 9 Safe Speeds—Humans are less likely to survive high-speed crashes. Reducing speeds can accommodate human-injury tolerances in three ways: reducing impact forces, providing additional time for drivers to stop, and improving visibility.

Safe Roads—Designing transportation infrastructure to accommodate human mistakes and injury tolerances can greatly reduce the severity of crashes that do occur. Examples include physically separating people traveling at different speeds, providing dedicated times for different users to move through a space, and alerting users to hazards and other road users.

Post-Crash Care—People who are injured in collisions rely on emergency first responders to quickly locate and stabilize their injuries and transport them to medical facilities. Post-crash care also includes forensic analysis at the crash site, traffic incident management, and other activities.

Adopting a Safe System approach does not absolve users of their responsibility. Other safety practices such as speed management strategies, driver education, enforcement, and effective emergency response will remain essential to improving road safety. With the passing of Assembly Bill (AB) 43, there will be flexibility in setting speed limits.

Figure 3.1 shows a graphic displaying the safe systems approach.

Figure 3.1 Safe Systems Approach

3.3.3 Vision, Mission Statement, and Goals

3.3.3.1 Vision
A vision statement describes what the Local Road Safety Plan is trying to achieve.

The City of American Canyon will strive toward the elimination of all traffic fatalities and severe injuries while increasing safe, healthy, and equitable mobility for all.

Source: FHWA.
352
City of American Canyon Local Roadway Safety Plan | Final 10

3.3.3.2 Mission Statement
The mission statement defines the purpose of the plan, what it does, and what it is about. The mission statement was developed in collaboration with the working group.

3.3.3.3 Goals
Safety goals were developed for the Local Roadway Safety Plan. It is important to capture realistic goals that can be measurable or evolve over time.

Goal #1: Create a safe, healthy, convenient, and connected community by developing a roadway safety plan targeted to American Canyon’s transportation and roadway safety needs.

Goal #2: Reduce the potential for fatal and severe injury collisions citywide.

Goal #3: Reduce rear end collisions on SR 29 by implementing strategies that mitigate speed.

Goal #4: Reduce broadside collisions on City roadways by implementing strategies that reduce Right of Way and Signals/signs violations.

Goal #5: Improve multimodal transportation safety by expanding the City’s non-motorized transportation infrastructure using context sensitive design.

Goal #6: Improve safety around schools by increasing multimodal infrastructure, enhanced crossings, and education and enforcement

3.3.3.4 Motto and Pledge
The City of American Canyon adopted a motto as part of their on-going efforts to create safer streets in the community. This motto encompasses the efforts of the LRSP as well as the Traffic Calming Program. The motto is:

We Safe Streets”
Residents are invited to take the safe streets pledge and proudly display the above decal to encourage others to take the pledge.

The City of American Canyon will provide a safe, sustainable, and equitable multimodal transportation system for all users of the public roadways in the city. we
353
City of American Canyon Local Roadway Safety Plan | Final 11

4. Analyze Safety Data

4.1 Recent/Planned Safety Projects

4.1.1 American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 Proposed Projects In March 2021, United States Congress passed the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 to provide additional relief in response to the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. The City of American Canyon was successful in receiving funding for multiple Capital Improvement Projects. The proposed projects are as follows:

Benton Way Enhanced Crosswalk Improvements
Class II Bike Lanes and Intersection Improvement Projects (See Figure 4.1 below) Elliott Drive Enhanced Crosswalk Improvements
Melvin Road Sidewalk and Drainage Improvements
Paving and Utility Improvements ( Rancho Del Mar Area)
Figure 4.1 Proposed ARPA Funded Bike Lane and Intersection Improvement Project

4.1.2 State Route 29 Multimodal Improvement Project
Regionally, State Route (SR) 29 provides a direct connection between counties along Interstate 80 (I -80) and I-580 and counties along US 101 in the North Bay. Locally, SR 29 is also the lifeblood of access into and out of Napa County. Notwithstanding their disparate local context, vehicular volumes on SR 29 are comparable to other nearby state highways (SR 12 and SR 37). However, because the SR 29 Corridor functions as American Canyon’s “Main Street”, it experiences significant safety, operational, and context sensitive design issues between American Canyon Road and Napa Junction during weekday and weekend peak hour conditions.

CLASS II BIKE LANES AND INTERSECTION INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT

ENHANCED PEDESTRIAN INTERSECTIONS
RffiER1~ CI. ASS Jl 8~E lAAES,.,:OCROSSWAU(.S PROJ' l
CRR =-
354
City of American Canyon Local Roadway Safety Plan | Final 12 This plan builds upon the previously completed SR 29 Comprehensive Multimodal Corridor Plan (completed May 2020) by identifying three alternative solutions to relieve traffic congestion, improve safety, support transit, and increase multimodal options for pedestrians and cyclists. These options then moved forward to the next phase of project development Project Initiation Document (PID). Per the SR 29 Corridor PID the preferred alternative is shown in Figure 4.2.

Figure 4.2 SR 29 Roundabout Corridor Alternative
Once the PID is approved, the preferred alternative will move forward to the Project Approval & Environmental Documents ( PA&ED) phase and Project Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E) design package with construction anticipated to begin in FY 2025/26.

4.1.3 Other Projects
In addition to the above projects, American Canyon has other projects in construction, planned, continually on-going, and recently completed. These projects are as follows:

In construction:

Green Island Road Reconstruction and Widening Project – Updating signal crossing, reconstructing railroad crossing, and constructing Class I multi-use trail (Napa Valley Vine Trail) On-going/Planned:

Bike Rodeos in coordination with the Napa County Bicycle Coalition Child Seat and Bike Helmet giveaways with pedestrian and bicycle safety presentations by ACPD Community Safety Booklets
Broadway District Specific Plan
Updates to the Traffic Calming Guidelines
Complete Streets Safety Assessment in coordination with Berkeley SafeTREC – currently underway and recommendations are being coordinated
Pedestrian Crossing Improvements at Daniel Drive and Flosden Road – previously evaluated improvements in consideration
Safe Routes to School in coordination with Napa County Bicycle Coalition and Napa Valley Transportation Authority
Citywide Speed Survey – currently underway by Fehr and Peers 355
City of American Canyon Local Roadway Safety Plan | Final 13 Recently Completed:

Devlin Road and Vine Trail Extension – Extension of Devlin Road to Green Island Road to improve circulation

4.2 Collision Data
The City of American Canyon collision data was gathered using the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System SWITRS) and Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS). The City supplemented some missing collision data using collision reports. Each data set was analyzed, crosschecked, and compiled into one complete comprehensive data set. This process was done to ensure that all reported collisions occurring within the City are accounted for and to provide additional information that one system may not have captured. The data set contains five years’ worth of collisions spanning from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2021.

Between 2017 and 2021, 671 collisions were reported in the City of American Canyon. These collisions were classified based on roadway jurisdiction (City or Caltrans). Collisions were further categorized into intersection related collisions and roadway segment related collisions with a separate focus on the City streets and Caltrans roadways.

The pie chart in Figure 4.3 depicts the number of collisions by collision location (intersection or segment) and jurisdiction ( City, SR 29). The highest number of collisions were at SR 29 intersections ( 270 collisions).

Figure 4.3 Total Collisions within the City of American Canyon ( 2017-2021) As shown on the collision density map (see Figure 4.4 below), areas with high density of collisions include along all of SR 29, American Canyon Road, Newell Drive, and Flosden Rd, 356
City of American Canyon Local Roadway Safety Plan | Final 14 Figure 4.4 Collision Density on All Roadways ( 2017-2021) i
i
i
i ,..
i "'-··-·-·••"'\
i
t.e<. cu: ns( ll! cOsen1l1tbr,~ 11e~~ t,.

11.o.nll di: rl,t,' ~ ll'Y.'> sx. ~i!lr,td ~N.$wt:n
OSF.
legend
Collision
Density
Low
CJ
c::::J
High
City Limits
i
357
City of American Canyon Local Roadway Safety Plan | Final 15

4.2.1 Collisions on City Roadways
There were 312 collisions recorded on roadways under the City’s jurisdiction between 2017 and 2021. There were 2 fatal collisions and 5 severe injury collisions on City roadways. Sideswipe collisions were the most common collision type followed by broadside and hit object collisions. Figure 4.5 summarizes the City collisions based on severity and type.

Figure 4.5 Summary of City Collisions ( 2017- 2021)
The top five violation categories ( not including unknown or not stated collisions) for City roadways are presented in Figure 4.6. The top violation category on City roadways was unsafe speed. Many of the unsafe speed collisions resulted in rear end collisions.

Figure 4.6 Top Violation Categories on City Roadways ( 2017-2021) Auto Right of Way
Traffic Signals and Signs

DUI/BUI
Improper Turning
Unsafe Speed
0 10
VehiclePedest rian, 16 "
Overturned , s -.
20 30 40
Other/ Not State d ,
15 50 60
Head On Sideswipe Rear End Broadside Hit Object Overturned Vehicle- Pedestrian Other 70 358
City of American Canyon Local Roadway Safety Plan | Final 16 With the Highway Safety Improvement Program ( HSIP) funding concentrating on the past five (5) years of collision data, further collision analysis focused on collisions from 2017 to 2021. The total number of collisions and Equivalent Property Damage Only (EPDO) rating were assessed to determine the top study intersections ( refer to Appendix B:

Collision Data). Per the Caltrans Local Roadway Safety Manual, it is recommended to rank locations with higher severity as higher focus. The Highway Safety Manual (HSM) methodology of Equivalent Property Damage Only EPDO) rating assigns a weight to collisions in capturing the relative severity in equivalent property damage only (PDO 1).

Table 4.1 provides the comprehensive collision costs and EPDO weights that were used in ranking the collisions.

Collision costs include both direct and indirect costs. Direct crash costs include ambulance service, police and fire services, property damage, insurance, and other costs directly related to the crashes. Indirect collision costs account for the value society would place on pain and suffering or loss of life associated with the crash.

Table 4.1 Comprehensive Collision Costs and Equivalent Property Damage Only (EPDO) Weights ( 2020 dollars) For the purposes of identifying priority locations for this plan, the intersection and segment collisions on City roadways were analyzed based off the LRSM EPDO ranking and total collisions. The top five intersections and segments in each of these three categories were identified as a priority. After removing duplicates between the lists, 7 unique City intersections, 7 unique State Route 29 intersections, 7 unique City roadway segments, and 5 unique State Route 29 segments were identified.

The intersection of American Canyon Rd and Broadway/ Silver Oak Trail had the highest severity ranking due to multiple severe injury collisions as well as the highest number of collisions ( 28). The intersection of Flosden Rd and Daniel Dr ranked second due to a fatality at the intersection. Table 4.2 shows the top intersections, per collision analysis. Further detailed collision analysis is in Appendix B: Collision Data.

Table 4.2 Top Intersections on City Roadways, Per Collision Analysis American Canyon Rd Broadway/ Silver Oak Trail 311 28
Flosden Rd Daniel Dr 209 5
American Canyon Rd Newell Dr/Flosden Rd 198 19
Rio Del Mar Los Altos Pl 197 3
Flosden Rd Canyon Creek Dr 32 7
Flosden Rd Via Bellagio 27 7
American Canyon Rd Via Firenze 22 7
EPDOPrimary Road Secondary Road
Total
Collisions
1 2
3 4
0 1& 2
3 4
0 Fatal
Severe Injury
Other Visible Injury
Complaint of Pain
Property Darmage Onl y
Hi hwa Safet Manual HSM
7,219, 800
389, 000
142, 300
80, 900
13, 300
Local Roadwa Safet Manual LRS ~·
Signalized Intersection $ 1,787, 000
Fatal & Severe Injur y Non-Signalized Intersection $ 2,843, 000 Roadway $ 2,46 1,000
Other Visible Injur y $ 159, 900
Complaint of Pain $ 90, 900
Property Darmage Onl y $ 14, 900
Based on Table 7-1, Highway Safety Manual (HSMJ, Fi,st Edition, 2010. Acyusted to 2020 r:t:Jlars.

Based on Equi\ Ja/ent Prcperty Damge Only ( EPDOJ
Local RoaCMay Safety: A Manual forGa/ ifonia' s Local Road O~ne, s (LRSMJ, Ve,sion 1.6, 2022. 543
29 11
6 120
191
165
11 6
359
City of American Canyon Local Roadway Safety Plan | Final 17 The segment collisions were also analyzed EPDO and total number of collisions. Table 4.3 shows the top segments, per collision analysis. The segment of American Canyon Road (Newell Drive to East City Limit) had the highest EPDO 178) and tied with two other segments for the highest number of collisions ( 9).

Table 4.3 Top Segments on City Roadways, Per Collision Analysis

4.2.1.1 Additional Locations
Per stakeholder feedback, the segments of Silver Oak Trail from American Canyon Road to Newell Drive and Benton Way from Wetlands Edge Road to Donaldson Way/Elliott Drive are included as priority locations. These two locations did not have significant enough severity or number of collisions to appear in the top segments on their own but are still top priorities due to their proximity to schools. Both locations are main routes to schools and see significant numbers of vulnerable road users during school hours.

Additionally, the Planning Commission identified the intersection of Rio Del Mar and Rio Grande as a location in need of improvements. The existing school crossing is located approximately 60 feet south of the intersection and lies at the end of a curve resulting in limited sight distance. Due to its proximity to a public park and multiple schools, this location sees significant numbers of vulnerable road users as well.

4.2.2 Collisions on Caltrans Roadways
There were 312 collisions recorded on Caltrans roadways between 2017 and 2021. Of these collisions, 179 were at SR 29 intersections and 133 were along segments. The intersection of SR 29 and American Canyon Road had the highest EPDO (650) and the highest number of collisions (59) in the five-year period between 2017 and 2021. Table

4.4 shows the top intersections, per collision analysis.

Table 4.4 Top Intersections on Caltrans Roadways, Per Collision Analysis The segment of SR 29 from American Canyon Road to the South City Limit had the highest EPDO (416) due to a fatality. The segment of SR 29 from Green Island Road to Napa Junction Road had the highest number of collisions 25). Table 4.5 shows the top segments per collision analysis. Further detailed collision analysis is in Appendix B:

Collision Data.

American Canyon Rd (Newell Dr to E City Limit) 178 9
Newell Dr (Silver Oak Trail to American Canyon Rd) 166 2 American Canyon Rd (SR 29 to Silver Oak Trail) 47 7
Paoli Loop Rd (SR 29 to SR 29 Overpass) 29 9
W American Canyon Rd (James Rd to SR 29) 22 7
Flosden Rd (Daniel Dr to S City Limit) 19 9
American Canyon Rd (Silver Oak Trail to Newell Dr) 18 8 Location
Total
CollisionsEPDO
SR 29 American Canyon Rd 650 59
SR 29 Rio Del Mar 522 50
SR 29 Poco Way 424 16
SR 29 Green Island Rd 244 15
SR 29 Napa Junction Rd 126 31
SR 29 Eucalyptus Dr 87 27
SR 29 Donaldson Way 70 25
EPDOPrimary Road Secondary Road
Total
Collisions
360
City of American Canyon Local Roadway Safety Plan | Final 18 Table 4.5 Top Segments on Caltrans Roadways, Per Collision Analysis

4.2.3 Collisions Related to Challenge/ Emphasis Areas

4.2.3.1 Pedestrians
There were twenty (20) total collisions involving pedestrians from 2017 to 2021. These majority took place at City intersections – 13 collisions occurred at City intersections, 5 occurred at SR 29 intersections, and 2 occurred along City segments. The pedestrian location at the time of collision, along with corresponding severity, is shown in Figure

4.7. Of the 20 collisions, 4 included pedestrians in the road (including the shoulder), and 14 included pedestrians crossing in the crosswalk at an intersection.

Figure 4.7 Pedestrian Location at Time of Collision
The mapped location of each pedestrian collision is shown in Figure 4.8.

SR 29 (American Canyon Rd to S City Limit) 416 23
SR 29 (Green Island Rd to Napa Junction Rd) 80 25
SR 29 (Rio Del Mar to Donaldson Way) 76 21
SR 29 (Donaldson Way to American Canyon Rd) 68 13
SR 29 (Napa Junction Rdto Rio Del Mar) 54 14
Location
Total
CollisionsEPDO
Not in Road
In Road, Including Shoulder -
Crossing in Crosswalk at Intersection
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Property Damage Only Severe Injury Injury (Other Visible) Injury (Complaint of Pain) 361
City of American Canyon Local Roadway Safety Plan | Final 19 Figure 4.8 Map of Pedestrian Collisions ( 2017-2021)
i
i
l
i
i
Green Island Rd
i
i
i
r -··-··-··-~ i: \. ____ _;
L --·-··-··-··-··-··
Legend •
Fatal •
Injury (Severe) •
Injury (Other
Visible) •
Injury (Complaint
of Pain) •
Property Damage
Only
Pedestrian
Collision
ti) Day
@ Night
l City Limit
362
City of American Canyon Local Roadway Safety Plan | Final 20

4.2.3.2 Bicyclists
There were twelve (12) total bicycle collisions in the City from 2017 to 2021 including one (1) fatal incident. The highest collision type was broadside with 5 collisions. The majority of these collisions took place at the intersections of SR 29 at American Canyon Rd and American Canyon Rd at Broadway/Silver Oak Trail. The type of bicycle collisions, along with corresponding severity, is shown in Figure 4.9.

Figure 4.9 Bicycle Collision Types and Severity
The mapped location of each bicycle collision is shown in Figure 4.10.

Other Improper Driving
Other Hazardous Violation
Traffic Signals and Signs
Pedestrian Violation
ImproperTurning
Wrong Side of Road
DUI
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
Property Damage Only Fatal Severe Injury Injury {Other Visible) Injury (Complaint of Pain) 363
City of American Canyon Local Roadway Safety Plan | Final 21 Figure 4.10 Map of Bicycle Collisions ( 2017-2021)
r ··
i
i
j
i
i
i
i , _____ _;
Dara O: sdah' e!
Legend
Bicycle
Collis ion
0 Day
Night
Severi ty
Fatal
Injury (Severe)
lnju, y (Othe r
V1Sible)
Injury (Complaint
of Pain)
Property Damage
Only
C:::JCity Limit
364
City of American Canyon Local Roadway Safety Plan | Final 22

4.2.3.3 Intersections
For the past 5 years (2017-2021), there were 671 collisions on all roadways in American Canyon (City and Caltrans jurisdictions). Of those collisions, 449 (67%) occurred at intersections. The majority of intersection collisions (270) occurred at intersections under Caltrans jurisdiction. There were 179 intersection related collisions at City intersections. The top violation category for intersections was unsafe speed (see Figure 4.8). The majority of unsafe speed violations resulted in rear end collisions.

Figure 4.11 Top 5 Violation Categories for Intersection Collisions

4.2.3.4 Aggressive Driving / Speeding
Aggressive driving including speeding can be assessed through collision violation categories for unsafe speed and traffic signals and signs violations. There were 279 collisions on all roadways in the City due to these violations between 2017 and 2021 (see Table 4.6). This is approximately 42 percent of all collisions on City roadways. Many of these collisions resulted in rear end or broadside collisions.

Table 4.6 Aggressive Driving Collisions on All Roadways ( 2017- 2021)

4.2.3.5 Distracted Driving
Distracted driving is categorized in collision data as inattention. Categories for inattention include cell phones handheld or hands-free), electronic equipment, smoking, eating, children, animal, personal hygiene, and reading.

There were 108 collisions between 2017 and 2021 that had inattention as a factor of the collision. Most of these Aggressive Driving Total
Fatal 1 4 25% 0%
Severe Injury 8 15 53% 1%
Injury (Other Visible) 24 57 42% 4%
Injury (Complaint of Pain) 94 183 51% 14%
Property Damage Only 152 412 37% 23%
TOTAL 279 671 - 42%
Collisions on All Roadways
Percentage of
Collisions Per
SeveritySeverity
Percentage of
Total
Collisions
Auto Right of Way
Traffic Signals and Signs
Improper Turning

DUI/BUI
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
Head On Sideswipe Rear End Broadside Hit Object Overturned Vehicle -Pedestrian Other 365
City of American Canyon Local Roadway Safety Plan | Final 23 collisions were listed an “Other” type of inattention and the second highest type of inattention was using a cell phone while driving.

5. Public Outreach

5.1 Public Website
A project website was created on the Social Pinpoint platform to inform the public about the LRSP and provide a platform for public engagement. Figure 5.1 displays the homepage for the website found at ghd.mysocialpinpoint. com/american- canyon-lrsp. The project website had the Google Translate option enabled that could translate the webpage in over 100 languages and detect the user’s browsers settings to automatically display the website in their language preference. In addition, the user could toggle the preferred language on the upper right corner of the webpage. Visitors to the page were invited to provide comments on an interactive project map and share their thoughts through a project survey. Comments from the interactive map and detailed results from the survey are included in Appendix A: Stakeholder and Public Input.

Figure 5.1 Public Website Home Page
The website was open to public input from May 11, 2022 to July 29, 2022 (80 days). It was promoted through a variety of sources including, but not limited to:

City Facebook
City Newsletter
City website
llf OI _ ADtt,
RmERICR~
rnnion --=--
Get Involved!
Home CityWebs,1e About GHO Contact Us ~
366
City of American Canyon Local Roadway Safety Plan | Final 24 NextDoor
Traffic Calming Workshop on May 19, 2022

5.1.1 Interactive Map
The interactive map feature on the website allowed the public to drag icons to a location within the City and leave a comment regarding driving, transit, schools biking, or pedestrians at that location. At the end of the open comment period, there were 292 map comments. Figure 5.2 shows the interactive map feature from the website. Areas with high densities of interactive map comments within American Canyon include Elliott Way between Benton Way and W American Canyon Road, James Road between Wilson Way and Donaldson Way W, Wetlands Edge Road, Donaldson Way E, Newell Drive, and Melvin Road.

Figure 5.2 Public Website Interactive Map
367
City of American Canyon Local Roadway Safety Plan | Final 25 Individual comments, along with their respective responses, are presented in Appendix A: Stakeholder and Public Input. As the comment collection period is still on-going, not all provided comments have been addressed at the time of this draft. All comments will be addressed in the final report appendices.

5.1.2 Public Survey
As shown in Figure 5.3, the City of American Canyon Public Survey asked respondents six questions relating to the LRSP and received 90 survey responses during the open comment period. According to the survey, the primary safety issues for American Canyon are intersections and speed related collisions. Other identified issues included lack of protected bike lanes, drivers running stop signs, and lack of traffic calming in neighborhoods.

Figure 5.3 Public-Identified Roadway Issues
All survey questions and their corresponding responses are provided in Appendix A: Stakeholder and Public Input.

5.2 Public Engagement
On May 19, 2022, the City of American Canyon held a Traffic Calming Workshop to update the public on the plans for traffic calming within the City. This workshop also addressed the LRSP and promoted the public website to receive public feedback.

Additionally, the American Canyon LRSP was presented at a City Council meeting on July 19, 2022, and at a Planning Commission meeting on July 28, 2022. These meetings provided updates to the public with the work completed on the plans and provided time at the end of the presentation for the attendees to address any questions or concerns they had. Attendees were also directed to the public website to leave comments on the interactive map and respond to the survey after these meetings.
l ack of Infrastruct ure ( s idew a lks , turn la ne.s, etc.): 45 Inte rsect ions: 61
Dist racted Drivi ng: 42 -
Bicycle Coll is ions and Saf ety: 30
Speed Re lated Coll isi ons: 57 Pedestrian Coll is ions and Sa fety: 46 368
City of American Canyon Local Roadway Safety Plan | Final 26

6. Identify Strategies
Through coordination and feedback from the City of American Canyon, LRSP stakeholder working group, and public outreach, safety projects and strategies were identified for the Local Roadway Safety Plan.

The LRSP references specific location engineering projects and systemic safety applications. In addition, safety strategies and projects that address the other E’s to include Enforcement, Education, Emergency Response, and Emerging Technologies will be discussed below.

6.1 Engineering Strategies
Recommended countermeasures for the priority locations were chosen per the most recent Caltrans, Local Roadway Safety Manual (Version 1.6), April 2022, guidance from the City and stakeholders on preferred countermeasures, crash characteristics, and observations from Google Maps.

6.1.1 Intersection Projects
The locations and characteristics of the seven (7) City and seven (7) Caltrans priority intersections are shown in Table

6.1 below.

Table 6.1 Priority Intersection Characteristics
The countermeasures recommended for these locations are presented in Table 6.2.

Primary Road Secondary Road Control
Re
l
a
t
i
v
e
S
e
v
e
r
i
t
y
E
P
D
O
To
t
a
l
C
r
a
s
h
e
s
Top Type of
Collision
Number of
Collisions)
Top Violation
Category ( Number of
Collisions)
Fa
t
a
l
S
e
v
e
r
e
I
n
j
u
r
y
a
t
N
i
g
h
t
We
t
Pe
d
Bi k
e
Inv
o
l
v
w
F
i
x
e
d
O
b
j
e
c
t
Pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
N
o
t
i
n
C
r
o
s
s
w
a
l
k
Al c
o
h
o
l
I
n
v
o
l
v
e
d
Da
r
k
w
i
t
h
N
o
S
t
r
e
e
t
l
i
g
h
t
s
City Jurisdiction
Flosden Rd Daniel Dr TWSC 209 5 All Unique All Unique 1 40% 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 American
Canyon Rd
Broadway/ Silver
Oak Trail
Signal 311 28 Broadside ( 11)
Traffic Signals and
Signs ( 8)
2 39% 3 3 3 1 0 6 0
American
Canyon Rd
Newell Dr/ Flosden
Rd
Signal 198 19 Broadside ( 7) Traffic Signals and
Signs ( 6)
1 32% 0 1 0 3 0 2 0
Rio Del Mar Los Altos Pl AWSC 197 3 Other ( 2) All Unique 1 0% 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Flosden Rd Canyon Creek Dr Signal 32 7 Broadside ( 3) Traffic Signals and Signs ( 2)
0 43% 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Flosden Rd Via Bellagio Signal 27 7 Broadside ( 3) Unsafe Speed ( 2) 0 29% 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 American
Canyon Rd
Via Firenze Signal 22 7
Sideswipe ( 2),
Hit Object ( 2)
DUI ( 2), Traffic Signals
and Signs ( 2)
0 57% 0 0 0 2 0 2 0
Caltrans Jurisdiction
SR 29
American Canyon
Rd
Signal 650 59 Rear End ( 30) Unsafe Speed ( 20) 4 36% 7 7 3 4 1 9 1 SR 29 Rio Del Mar Signal 522 50 Rear End ( 38) Unsafe Speed ( 34) 3 26% 9 9 0 2 0 6 1 SR 29 Napa Junction Rd Signal 126 31 Rear End ( 20) Unsafe Speed ( 16) 0 29% 3 3 0 1 1 1 2 SR 29 Poco Way TWSC 424 16 Rear End ( 7) Auto Right of Way ( 5) 2 13% 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 SR 29 Eucalyptus Dr Signal 87 27 Rear End ( 22) Unsafe Speed ( 14) 0 37% 2 2 0 1 0 6 1 SR 29 Green Island Rd TWSC 244 15 Rear End ( 9) Unsafe Speed ( 9) 1 27% 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 SR 29 Donaldson Way Signal 70 25 Rear End ( 16) Unsafe Speed ( 8) 0 20% 4 4 1 0 0 5 0 Crash Characteristics
369
City of American Canyon Local Roadway Safety Plan | Final 27 Table 6.2 Recommended Countermeasures for Priority Intersections Intersection Control
Re
l
a
t
i
v
e
S
e
v
e
r
i
t
y
E
P
D
O
To
t
a
l
C
o
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
s
Top Type of
Collision
Co
u
n
t
e
r
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
Nu
m
b
e
r
CR
F
Fu
n
d
i
n
g
E
l
i
g
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
Recommended Countermeasures
NS11 20% 90% Evaluate and improve sight distance to intersection NS20PB 10% 90% Install pedestrian crossing ( new signs and markings only) S03 15% 50% Improve signal timing ( coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation)
S02 15% 90% Improve signal hardware: lenses, backplates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
S21PB 60% 90% Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval ( LPI)
S03 15% 50% Improve signal timing ( coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation)
S02 15% 90%
Improve signal hardware: lenses, backplates with
retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
S21PB 60% 90%
Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval ( LPI)
Rio Del Mar / Los Altos Pl AWSC 197 3 Other ( 2) NS05mr 30% 90% Evaluate conversion to mini- roundabout 1 S03 15% 50% Improve signal timing ( coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation)
S02 15% 90% Improve signal hardware: lenses, backplates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
S21PB 60% 90% Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval ( LPI)
S03 15% 50% Improve signal timing ( coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation)
S02 15% 90% Improve signal hardware: lenses, backplates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
S21PB 60% 90% Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval ( LPI)
S03 15% 50% Improve signal timing ( coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation)
S02 15% 90% Improve signal hardware: lenses, backplates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
S21PB 60% 90% Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval ( LPI)
Install high visibility yellow school crosswalk striping Relocate existing school crossing
NS21PB 35% 90% Install/ upgrade pedestrian crossing at uncontrolled locations with enhanced safety features)
S21PB 60% 90% Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval ( LPI)
S03 15% 50% Improve signal timing ( coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation)
S21PB 60% 90% Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval ( LPI)
S03 15% 50% Improve signal timing ( coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation)
SR 29 / Napa Junction Rd 4 126 31 Rear End ( 20) S03 15% 50% Improve signal timing ( coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation)
S03 15% 50% Improve signal timing ( coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation)
S21PB 60% 90% Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval ( LPI)
Install signage for traffic merging onto SR 29
Replace botts dots with thermoplastic striping
SR 29 / Donaldson Way 4 70 25 Rear End (16) S03 15% 50% Improve signal timing ( coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation)
Countermeasure number is per the LRSMand can be found in the Appendix 1 Intersection must meet CA MUTCD warrants to implement countermeasure Mitigations along SR 29 influence the operations and safety of this intersection.

Flosden Rd / Daniel Dr TWSC 209 5
Flosden Rd / Via Bellagio Signal
0 4244 Rear End ( 7)
Rear End ( 38)
Sideswipe ( 2),
Hit Object ( 2)
Broadside ( 3)
0 27
SR 29 / Eucalyptus Dr
2444SR 29 / Green Island Rd 15 Rear End (9)
873 27 Rear End ( 22)
16 7
7 Broadside ( 11)
198 19
7 Broadside ( 3)
All Unique
Broadside ( 7)
City Jurisdiction
American Canyon Rd / Via
Firenze
Signal 22
American Canyon Rd /
Broadway/ Silver Oak Trail
Signal 311 28
American Canyon Rd /
Newell Dr/Flosden Rd
Signal
59 50
Caltrans Jurisdiction
SR 29 / American Canyon
Rd
4 650 Rear End (30)
Flosden Rd / Canyon Creek
Dr
Signal 32
Rio Del Mar / Rio Grande AWSC
SR 29 / Poco Way
5223SR 29 / Rio Del Mar
370
City of American Canyon Local Roadway Safety Plan | Final 28

6.1.2 Segment Projects
Throughout the analysis period, there were 133 collisions reported on City of American Canyon roadway segments and 89 collisions on SR 29 roadway segments (non-intersection related). A breakdown of roadway collisions on City streets are included in Appendix B: Collision Data. Priority segments and their crash characteristics for the City of American Canyon are displayed in Table 6.3 below.

Table 6.3 Priority Segments Characteristics
The countermeasures recommended for these locations are presented in Table 6.4.

Primary Road Limits
Length
mi)
Re
l
a
t
i
v
e
S
e
v
e
r
i
t
y
E
P
D
O
To
t
a
l
C
r
a
s
h
e
s
Top Type of
Collision
Number of
Collisions)
Top Violation
Category ( Number of
Collisions)
Fa
t
a
l
S
e
v
e
r
e
I
n
j
u
r
y
a
t
N
i
g
h
t
We
t
Pe
d
Pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
N
o
t
i
n
Cr o
s
s
w
a
l
k
Bi k
e
Inv
o
l
v
w
P
a
r
k
e
d
C
a
r
Inv
o
l
v
w
F
i
x
e
d
O
b
j
e
c
t
Al c
o
h
o
l
I
n
v
o
l
v
e
d
City Jurisdiction
Newell Dr
Silver Oak Trail to
American Canyon
Rd

0.31 166 2 Hit Object ( 2)
DUI ( 1), Unsafe Speed
1) 1 100% 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
American
Canyon Rd
SR 29 to Silver
Oak Trail

0.12 47 7 Rear End ( 4) Unsafe Speed ( 4) 0 29% 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 American
Canyon Rd
Newell Dr to E City
Limit

0.38 178 9 Hit Object ( 3) Unsafe Speed ( 3) 1 22% 2 0 0 0 0 3 1 Paoli Loop Rd
SR 29 to SR 29
Overpass

0.46 29 9 Head On ( 3) Unsafe Speed ( 7) 0 44% 3 0 0 0 1 4 0 W American
Canyon Rd
James Rd to SR 29 0.13 22 7 Broadside ( 5) Auto Right of Way ( 5) 0 14% 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Flosden Rd
Daniel Dr to S City
Limit

0.26 19 9 Hit Object ( 5)
Improper Turning ( 3),
Auto Right of Way ( 3)
0 44% 0 0 0 0 0 5 2
American
Canyon Rd
Silver Oak Trail to
Newell Dr

0.55 18 8 Hit Object ( 4) Unsafe Speed ( 3) 0 13% 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 Silver Oak Trail
American Canyon
Rd to Newell Dr

0.59 3 3
Rear End ( 1),
Broadside ( 1),
Hit Object ( 1)
Improper Turning ( 1),
Auto Right of Way ( 1),
Unknown ( 1)
0 0% 0 0 0 0 1 1 0
Benton Way
Wetlands Edge Rd
to Donaldson
Way/ Elliott Dr

0.36 16 6
Sideswipe ( 2),
Broadside ( 2)
Traffic Signals and
Signs ( 2) 0 16% 1 0 0 0 0 1 0
Caltrans
SR 29
American Canyon
Rd to S City Limit

0.69 416 23 Rear End ( 11) Unsafe Speed ( 9) 2 48% 3 0 0 1 0 6 4 SR 29
Green Island Rd to
Napa Junction Rd

0.71 80 25 Rear End ( 16) Unsafe Speed ( 18) 0 20% 2 0 0 0 0 4 2 SR 29
Rio Del Mar to
Donaldson Way

0.55 76 21 Rear End ( 16) Unsafe Speed ( 13) 0 43% 1 0 0 0 1 2 2 SR 29
Donaldson Way to
American Canyon
Rd

0.38 68 13 Rear End ( 6) Unsafe Speed ( 5) 0 46% 1 0 0 0 1 2 3 SR 29
Napa Junction Rd
to Rio Del Mar

0.39 54 14 Rear End ( 12) Unsafe Speed ( 12) 0 50% 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 Crash Characteristics
371
City of American Canyon Local Roadway Safety Plan | Final 29 Table 6.4 Recommended Countermeasures for Priority Segments Segment
Re
l
a
t
i
v
e
S
e
v
e
r
i
t
y
E
P
D
O
To
t
a
l
C
o
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
s
Top Type of
Collision Le
n
g
t
h
Co
u
n
t
e
r
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
N
u
m
b
e
r
CR
F
Fu
n
d
i
n
g
E
l
i
g
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
Recommended Countermeasures
City Jurisdiction
Newell Dr (Silver Oak
Trail to American
Canyon Rd)
166 2 Hit Object ( 2) 0.31 R26 30% 90% Install dynamic/ variable speed warning signs American Canyon Rd
SR 29 to Silver Oak
Trail)
47 7 Rear End ( 4) 0.12
R26 30% 90% Install dynamic/ variable speed warning signs R04 25% 90% Install guardrail
R27 15% 90% Install delineators, reflectors and/ or object markers Repair and paint ( retroreflective) median end caps
R26 30% 90% Install dynamic/ variable speed warning signs R30 20% 90% Install centerline rumble strips/ stripes
W American Canyon
Rd (James Rd to SR
29)
22 7 Broadside ( 5) 0.13 --- Evaluate sight distance at driveways R26 30% 90% Install dynamic/ variable speed warning signs R27 15% 90% Install delineators, reflectors and/ or object markers R26 30% 90% Install dynamic/ variable speed warning signs R27 15% 90% Install delineators, reflectors and/ or object markers R35PB 35% 90% Install/ upgrade pedestrian crossing ( with enhanced features)
R26 30% 90% Install dynamic/ variable speed warning signs R35PB 35% 90% Install/ upgrade pedestrian crossing ( with enhanced features)
R26 30% 90% Install dynamic/ variable speed warning signs Caltrans Jurisdiction
R01 35% 90% Add segment lighting
R26 30% 90% Install dynamic/ variable speed warning signs R01 35% 90% Add segment lighting
R26 30% 90% Install dynamic/ variable speed warning signs R01 35% 90% Add segment lighting
R26 30% 90% Install dynamic/ variable speed warning signs R01 35% 90% Add segment lighting
R26 30% 90% Install dynamic/ variable speed warning signs R01 35% 90% Add segment lighting
R26 30% 90% Install dynamic/ variable speed warning signs Countermeasure number is per the LRSM and can be found in the Appendix Benton Way
Wetlands Edge Rd to
Donaldson
Way/ Elliott Dr)
16 6
Sideswipe ( 2),
Broadside ( 2)
Silver Oak Trail
American Canyon
Rd to Newell Dr)
3 3
Rear End ( 1),
Broadside ( 1),
Hit Object ( 1)

0.39 25
SR 29 (Napa Junction
Rd to Rio Del Mar) 54 14 Rear End ( 12)

0.55 SR 29 (Donaldson
Way to American
Canyon Rd)
68 13 Rear End ( 6) 0.38
SR 29 (Rio Del Mar to
Donaldson Way) 76 21 Rear End ( 16)
SR 29 (American
Canyon Rd to S City
Limit)
416 23 Rear End ( 11)
80 Rear End ( 16)
SR 29 (Green Island
Rd to Napa Junction
Rd)

0.71 0.38

0.46 0.69

0.59 0.36
29 Head On (3)
Flosden Rd (Daniel
Dr to S City Limit) 19 Hit Object ( 5)
American Canyon Rd
Silver Oak Trail to
Newell Dr)
18 Mitigations at American Canyon Rd/SR 19 and American Canyon Rd/Silver Oak Trail intersections influence the operations and safety of this segment.

Hit Object ( 4) 0.55
9 9
9 8

0.26 178 Hit Object ( 3)
American Canyon Rd
Newell Dr to E City
Limit)
Paoli Loop Rd (SR 29
to SR 29 Overpass)
372
City of American Canyon Local Roadway Safety Plan | Final 30

6.1.3 Systemic Safety Countermeasures
When selecting countermeasures, just focusing on locations with current collision issues is a reactive approach to roadway safety planning. A reactive approach targets recent hot-spots and specific problems that are associated with these locations; as a result of this approach, locations with low traffic volumes but with similar safety issues as hot spot locations are not addressed. To mitigate collisions in a both a reactive and proactive approach, Caltrans’ Local Roadway Safety Manual suggests agencies utilize a comprehensive approach that includes systemic and hot spot location improvements in developing a safety plan.

Potential countermeasures that can be applied systemically throughout various locations in the City are presented in Table 6.5 below.

Table 6.5 Systemic Countermeasures

6.1.4 Active Transportation
American Canyon has an active walking and biking community, with multimodal improvements already on the roadways or in planning and design. In evaluating future transportation projects, it is important to look for opportunities to incorporate facilities and safety improvements for bicycle, pedestrians, and transit, including evaluating protected bicycle and pedestrian pathways. This will help to provide a safe alternative to driving and reduce greenhouse gases while increasing the health and vitality of the community. The reduction of greenhouse gases and increase of active transportation coincides with the City’s Climate Adaption Plan which is in the process of being updated.

Location
Type of
Countermeasure
Countermeasure
Education
Pedestrian and bicycle education
campaign (crossing at crosswalks,
wearing high-visibility clothing at night,
following the bicycle rules of the road etc.)
Education Safe driver education for all drivers
Education Safe driving campaign for students
Enforcement Speed enforcement and management 2
Engineering Install bike infrastructure1
Engineering Add sidewalks/ close sidewalk gaps
Engineering Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements 1
Engineering
Provide pedestrian countdown timers,
updated push buttons, AND Leading
Pedestrian Intervals (LPIs) at signalized
intersections ( as needed)
Engineering
Flashing Yellow Arrows/Protected Left
Turn signal heads at signalized
intersections
Engineering
Evalute installation of green bike conflict
markings at intersections 1
Engineering
Evalute adding bike boxes at
intersections 1
1 Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements and Bike Safety Improvements are part of the HSIP Set Aside funding and do not require previous collision history 2 Speed Management can include the installation of traffic calming devices and/ or speed limit changes through AB 43
Citywide
373
City of American Canyon Local Roadway Safety Plan | Final 31 With additional bikeways and safety improvements, the City acknowledges the importance of bike racks at major attractions and plans to incorporate these into improvement plans.

6.2 Non-Engineering Strategies
A comprehensive approach to selecting countermeasure recognizes that not all safety issues can be addressed through infrastructure improvements. The comprehensive approach to safety involves the 5 E’s of traffic safety.

Besides engineering safety countermeasures, it is important to recommend safety countermeasures to coincide with the other safety E’s. Non-engineering strategies for the American Canyon LRSP are shown in Table 6.6 below.

Table 6.6 Non-Engineering Strategies
Recommended Strategy
Pedestrian education campaign
Bicyclist education and resources
Safe Routes to School maps and outreach at schools
Social media blasts with quick education tool for all users Dangers of speeding/ speed management campaigns
Driver education through distracted driving campaigns
Partner with Regional and Local partners ( NVTA, Napa Bike, NCOE) ITS infrastructure, web/ mobile application ( apps) and smart cities practices Crash warning system
Changeable message signs
Bicycle detection
Upgraded controllers for leading pedestrian intervals as needed.

Installing touchless Accessible Pedestrian Signals
Targeted speed enforcement
Focused DUI check points or routine stops
Increasing number of traffic enforcement officers through OTS grants Distracted driving enforcement
Maintain emergency preemption at signalized intersections Improve and maintain access for emergency response vehicles Emergency
Response
Strategy Type
Education
Emerging
Technologies
Enforcement
OJ
0 C}
374
City of American Canyon Local Roadway Safety Plan | Final 32

7. Prioritize and Incorporate Strategies

7.1 Funding Sources
Funding opportunities can come through grant funding such as HSIP, Active Transportation Program (ATP), and other state funded grants. It should be noted that the Active Transportation Program (ATP) funding is very competitive and typically awarded for larger projects in high-density communities.

Each HSIP cycle has available project funding for Benefit to Cost Ratio (BCR) and funding set-aside projects. BCR projects use expected benefit and estimated cost to determine eligibility and likelihood for receiving funding. The expected benefit is determined using the crash history and the predicted collision reduction from the recommended countermeasures.

HSIP also provides funding set-aside projects that do not require a collision history. Set aside funding consist s of guardrail upgrades, pedestrian crossing enhancements, installing edge -lines, bike safety improvements, and set-aside for tribes. Each of the set-aside projects except the tribal set-asides are applicable for the City of American Canyon.

For funding for the non-engineering strategies, the California Office of Traffic Safety has resources that can be used by the City to help in traffic safety education for residents. Some campaigns highlighted in their website include impaired driving, distracted driving, pedestrian & bicycle safety, and speeding. The website provides educational materials, safety tips, facts, and resources to use in educating the public on traffic safety.

7.2 Prioritized Projects
In evaluating how to implement safety projects, preliminary benefit -to-cost ratios (BCRs) for priority intersection and segment projects were calculated using the HSIP Cycle 11 Analyzer. Tables 7.1 and 7.2 contain lists of the proposed intersection and segment projects and their corresponding BCRs. These tables also show additional potential funding opportunities. It should be noted that some of the recommended countermeas ures are not current HSIP countermeasures. However, these improvements can typically be included in an HSIP project provided the cost does not exceed 20% of the total project cost.

In addition, the awarded projects through the BCR application for HSIP Cycle 10 started at a BCR of 12. Even though the minimum for the grant application was a BCR of 3.5, the projects submitted were very competitive. Some of this was due to agencies’ funding shortfalls with COVID lockdowns and the HSIP grant application deadline extension which allowed more agencies to submit. Therefore, the maximum project cost is also included for a BCR of 10. 375
City of American Canyon Local Roadway Safety Plan | Final 33 Table 7.1 Priority of City Intersection Projects
Intersection Recommended Countermeasures
Ma
x
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
C
o
s
t
f
o
r
B
C
Ra
t
i
o
o
f
1 0
Pr e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
B
C
R
a
t
i
o
To
t
a
l
E
x
p
e
c
t
e
d
B
e
n
e
f
i
t
Pr e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
E
s
t
im
a
t
e
d
Pr o
j
e
c
t
C
o
s
t
HS
I
P
F
u
n
d
i
n
g
Re
i
m
b
u
r
s
e
m
e
n
t
R
a
t
i
o
HS
I
P
S
e
t
A
s
i
d
e
City Jurisdiction
Improve sight distance to intersection ( Clear Sight Triangles) 90% Install pedestrian crossing at uncontrolled locations ( new signs and markings only)
90% PCE
Improve signal hardware: lenses, back- plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
90%
Improve signal timing ( coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation)
50%
Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval LPI)
90%
Improve signal hardware: lenses, back- plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
90%
Improve signal timing ( coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation)
50%
Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval LPI)
90%
Rio Del Mar and Los
Altos Pl
Convert intersection to mini- roundabout $ 353, 856 18. 1 $ 3,538, 561 $ 195, 000 90% Improve signal hardware: lenses, back- plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
90%
Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation)
50%
Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval LPI)
90%
Improve signal hardware: lenses, back- plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
90%
Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation)
50%
Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval LPI)
90%
Improve signal hardware: lenses, back- plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
90%
Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation)
50%
Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval LPI)
90%
Caltrans Jurisdiction
Improve signal timing ( coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation)
50%
Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval LPI)
90%
Improve signal timing ( coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation)
50%
Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval LPI)
90%
SR 29 and Napa
Junction Rd
Improve signal timing ( coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation)$
56, 547 8.7 $ 565, 471 $ 65, 000 50%
Improve signal timing ( coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation)
50%
Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval LPI)
90%
SR 29 and Donaldson
Way
Improve signal timing ( coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation)$ 31, 275 4.8 $ 312, 751 $ 65, 000 50%
Includes 30% contingency
PCE = Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements
74, 750
SR 29 and Rio Del Mar $ 597, 777 80. 0 $ 5,977, 771 $ 74, 750 SR 29 and American
Canyon Rd $ 328, 342 43. 9 $ 3,283, 423
Flosden Rd and Daniel
Dr $
134, 976 $ 00034. 6 1,349, 760 $ 39,
Flosden Rd and Canyon
Creek Dr $ 34, 389 3.9 $ 343, 893 $ 87, 750
American Canyon Rd
and Newell Dr/ Flosden
Rd
171, 784 19. 6 $ 1,717, 839 $ 87, 750
American Canyon Rd
and Broadway/ Silver
Oak Trail
579, 442 $ 75066. 0 5,794, 422 $ 87,
22, 272 2.5 $ 222, 722 $ 87, 750
American Canyon Rd
and Via Firenze $ 18, 054 2.1 $ 180, 542 $ 87, 750
009SR 29 and Eucalyptus Dr $ 39, 0915. 2 390,
Flosden Rd and Via
Bellagio
74, 750
376
City of American Canyon Local Roadway Safety Plan | Final 34 Table 7.2 Priority of City Segment Projects
Segment Recommended Countermeasures
Ma
x
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
C
o
s
t
f
o
r
B
C
Ra
t
i
o
o
f
1 0
Pr e
l
im
i
n
a
r
y
B
C
R
a
t
i
o
To
t
a
l
E
x
p
e
c
t
e
d
B
e
n
e
f
i
t
Pr e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
E
s
t
im
a
t
e
d
Pr o
j
e
c
t
C
o
s
t
HS
I
P
F
u
n
d
i
n
g
Re
i
m
b
u
r
s
e
m
e
n
t
R
a
t
i
o
HS
I
P
S
e
t
A
s
i
d
e
City Jurisdiction
Newell Dr ( Silver Oak
Trail to American
Canyon Rd)
Install dynamic/ variable speed warning signs $ 148,554 76.2 $ 1,485,541 $ 19,500 90% Install dynamic/ variable speed warning signs 90%
Install guardrail 90% G
Install delineators, reflectors and/or object markers 90% Install dynamic/ variable speed warning signs 90%
Install centerline rumble strips/ stripes 90%
Install dynamic/ variable speed warning signs 90%
Install delineators, reflectors and/ or object markers 90% Install dynamic/ variable speed warning signs 90%
Install delineators, reflectors and/or object markers 90% Install dynamic/ variable speed warning signs 90%
Install pedestrian crossing ( with enhanced safety features) 90% PCE Install dynamic/ variable speed warning signs 90%
Install pedestrian crossing ( with enhanced safety features) 90% PCE Caltrans Jurisdiction
Add segment lighting 90%
Install dynamic/ variable speed warning signs 90%
Add segment lighting 90%
Install dynamic/ variable speed warning signs 90%
Add segment lighting 90%
Install dynamic/ variable speed warning signs 90%
Add segment lighting 90%
Install dynamic/ variable speed warning signs 90%
Add segment lighting 90%
Install dynamic/ variable speed warning signs 90%
Includes 30% contingency
G = Upgrade Guardrail, PCE = Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements Flosden Rd ( Daniel Dr to
S City Limit)$
23, 174 10. 9 $ 231, 743 $ 21, 285
Paoli Loop Rd (SR 29 to
SR 29 Overpass)$
37,321 4.5 $ 373,209 $ 82,649
84, 500
American Canyon Rd
Newell Dr to E City
Limit)
426, 984 49. 0 $ 4,269, 843 $ 87, 108
SR 29 ( Green Island Rd
to Napa Junction Rd)$ 108,508 4.1 $ 1,085,076 $ 262,600 21,967 9.4
Silver Oak Trail
American Canyon Rd to
Newell Dr)
2,682
American Canyon Rd
Silver Oak Trail to
Newell Dr)
219,674 $ 23,275
SR 29 ( American Canyon
Rd to S City Limit)$ 761,181 29.0 $ 7,611,811 $ 262,600

0.3 $ 26, 821 $ 84, 500
Benton Way ( Wetlands
Edge Rd to Donaldson
Way/ Elliott Dr)
9,924 1.2 $ 99, 241
SR 29 ( Napa Junction Rd
to Rio Del Mar)$ 83, 636 5.1 $ 836, 357 $ 162, 500
SR 29 ( Rio Del Mar to
Donaldson Way)$ 111,604 5.4 $ 1,116,040 $ 205,400
SR 29 ( Donaldson Way
to American Canyon Rd)$ 125, 012 8.4 $ 1,250, 116 $ 148, 200 377
City of American Canyon Local Roadway Safety Plan | Final 35

8. Evaluation Process
To evaluate the success of this plan, yearly collision analysis, along with requests for public feedback, can take place and be compared to the established goals.

Goal: Create a safe, healthy, convenient, and connected community by developing a roadway safety plan targeted to American Canyon’ s transportation and roadway safety needs.

Measure of Success: The number of residents choosing alternative modes of transportation more often noticeably increases after the implementation of this plan and proposed countermeasures . Residents report feeling safe and are better able to navigate the City without a vehicle. This can be captured through a public survey.

Goal: Reduce the potential for fatal and severe injury collisions citywide.

Measure of Success: There is a downward trend of fatal and severe injury collisions throughout the City over a 5-year period.

Goal: Reduce rear end collisions on SR 29 by implementing strategies that mitigate speeding.

Measure of Success: There is a downward trend of rear end collisions on SR 29 after speed management strategies have been implemented over a 5-year period.

Goal: Reduce broadside collisions in City roadways by implementing strategies that reduce Right of Way and Signals/Signs violations.

Measure of Success: There is a downward trend of broadside collisions on City roadways after strategies have been implemented over a 5-year period.

Goal: Improve multimodal transportation safety by expanding the City’s opportunities for nonmotorized transportation infrastructure using context sensitive designs.

Measure of Success: American Canyon prioritizes multimodal improvements in grant and city funding opportunities with context sensitive design solutions. With these improvements, there will be a downward trend in bicycle and pedestrian collisions with vehicles over a 5-year period.

Goal: Improve safety around schools by increasing multimodal infrastructure, enhanced crossings, and education and enforcement.

Measure of Success: Residents will feel more comfortable choosing multimodal transportation to travel to and from school zones and express an increased feeling of safety in these areas. This can be captured through a survey from the schools.
0 e
0 a rc1: 1-
378
City of American Canyon Local Roadway Safety Plan | Final 36

9. Next Steps
The City of American Canyon sent the Local Roadway Safety Plan to City Council for adoption on August 16, 2022, where it was unanimously adopted. This safety plan is a living document and will guide the City’s roadway safety needs for the next five years. It will be updated as needed and the goals will be monito red. 379
City of American Canyon Local Roadway Safety Plan | Final 37

10. References
Recent/Planned Projects
Traffic Data
City of American Canyon Collision Data, Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System, 2017-2021.

City of American Canyon Collision Data, Transportation Injury Mapping System, 2017-2021.

Plans/Manuals/Articles
Developing Safety Plans, A Manual for Local Rural Road Owners”, Federal Highway Administration, March 2012, http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/local_rural/training/fhwasa12017/. 2020-2024 California’s Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP), “California Safe Roads: 2020-2024 Strategic Highway Safety Plan”, Caltrans.

Local Roadway Safety, A Manual for California’s Local Road Owners”, Caltrans, Version 1.6, April 2022 Highway Safety Manual”, American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHTO), 1st Edition, 2014 supplement.

California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD)”, Revision 5, 2014.

Websites
California Department of Transportation, “ Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP)”, https://dot.ca.gov/programs/ safety-programs/ shsp.

California Department of Transportation, “ Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) and Systemic Safety Analysis Report Program (SSARP)”, https://dot.ca.gov/programs/ local-assistance/ fed-and-state-programs/highway- safetyimprovement-program/local-roadway-safety-plans.

California Department of Transportation, “HSIP Cycle 10”, https://dot.ca.gov/programs/local-assistance/fed-andstate-programs/highway-safety-improvement-program/apply-now.

City of American Canyon Local Road Safety Plan, https://ghd.mysocialpinpoint.com/american-canyon-lrsp Institute of Transportation Engineers, https://www.ite.org/technical- resources/ topics/safe-systems/.

Surveys
Local Road Safety Plan Project Survey, https://ghd.mysocialpinpoint.com/american-canyon-lrsp. 380
City of American Canyon Local Roadway Safety Plan | Final Appendix A
Stakeholder and Public Input
381
Agenda
The Power of Commitment
12574952 | City of American Canyon Local Road Safety Plan 1 May 03, 2022
Project City of American Canyon Local Road
Safety Plan
From Kathryn Kleinschmidt
Subject Stakeholder Working Group Meeting Tel + 1 805 858-3147 Date/Time May 3, 2022 from 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. Project no. 12574952

1. Introductions
a. Erica Ahmann Smithies -Safety Champion/Project Manager for the City b. LRSP Stakeholder Working Group members
i. Role and interest in serving on this committee

2. Background
a. Purpose of LRSP
i. Engages stakeholders representing all E’s and other local community stakeholders neighboring jurisdictions, advocacy groups, and officials) in developing a plan of action to increase safety and create a prioritized list of projects b. LRSP Process

3. Data Analysis
a. Collision data from the past 6 complete years (2015-2020) i. Location
ii. Hot Spot Locations
iii. Collision Severity
iv. Collision Type
v. Fatal and Severe Injury Collisions
vi. Environmental Factors
vii. Top Violation Categories
viii. Pedestrian Collisions
ix. Bicycle Collisions
b. Focus challenge areas per Strategic Highway Safety Plan c. Top ranking intersections and segments
d. Safety Approach
i. Safe System Approach
e. Safety Projects
i. Recent, on-going, and planned
ii. ARPA proposed projects
iii. SR 29

4. Vision, Goals, & Priorities
i. Vision
ii. Goals
iii. Mission Statement
iv. Metrics and Strategies
v. FHWA’s Proven Safety Countermeasures
vi. HSIP Funding
382
The Power of Commitment
12574952 | City of American Canyon Local Road Safety Plan 2

5. Plan Updates
a. Track metrics
b. Update every 5 years
c. Living document

6. Other Items
a. Public Outreach
b. Action Items
383
Agenda
The Power of Commitment
12574952 | City of American Canyon Local Road Safety Plan 1 June 16, 2022
Project City of American Canyon Local Road
Safety Plan
From Kathryn Kleinschmidt
Subject Stakeholder Working Group Meeting # 2 Tel + 1 805 858-3147 Date/Time June 16, 2022, from 2 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. Project no. 12574952

1. Introductions
a. Facilitators
b. Safety Champion/Project Manager for the County/City
c. LRSP Stakeholder Working Group members

2. 1st Meeting Summary
a. Meeting summary
i. Challenge/ emphasis areas
ii. Sample mission, vision, and goals
iii. Collision analysis from past 5 years
b. Guiding principles
i. Finalize mission, vision, and goals

3. Recent Developments
a. Public website engagement
i. Overall engagement
ii. Summarized interactive map comments
iii. Summarized survey results

4. Safety Countermeasures
a. Methodology
b. Countermeasures for City and Caltrans roadways
i. Recent projects
ii. Priority locations

1. Intersection countermeasures

2. Segment countermeasures
iii. Systemic countermeasures
iv. Non-engineering strategies

5. Next Steps
a. Provide feedback on meeting topics
b. Public meeting to follow
c. Draft LRSP document
R --
384
Memorandum
The Power of Commitment
12574952 1
August 11, 2022
To Erica Smithies, Becky Hendryx Tel + 1-805-858-3147
From Kathryn Kleinschmidt Email Kathryn. Kleinschmidt@ghd. com CC Kiera Bryant Ref. No. 12574952
Subject Summary of Current Public Engagement from the American Canyon LRSP Public Website

1. Introduction
This memorandum documents the public website engagement from the American Canyon Local Roadway Safety Plan public website (ghd.mysocialpinpoint.com/american-canyon-lrsp). The website opened for public input on May 12, 2022 and is still accepting responses at the time of this memorandum. It was promoted through a variety of sources including, but not limited to:

City of American Canyon Facebook post (May 12, 2022) and news feed City of American Canyon city website home page
City of American Canyon Traffic Calming Workshop ( May 19, 2022)

2. Public Website Results

2.1 Overall Engagement
Figure 1 shows the number of unique stakeholders, interactive map comments, and survey responses that the website gathered during the current public input period. Unique stakeholders are the number of people who are interacting with the website (adding comments/answering surveys).

Figure 1 Summary of Current Engagement
The week with the most engagement ( highest number of comments and survey responses submitted) was June 28 to July 6. Figure 2 shows the stakeholder engagement by day.

R --
164 292 90
Unique Stakeholders Comments Survey Responses
385
The Power of Commitment
12574952 2
Figure 2 Stakeholder Engagement by Day

2.2 Interactive Map Engagement
There were 151 comments on the interactive map feature of the website. This feature on the website allowed the public to drag icons to a location within the city and leave a comment regarding driving, transit, schools, biking, or pedestrians at that location. The recorded interactive map comments are mapped in Attachment 1.

The top comment type was a driving comment (see Figure 3 for the breakdown of responses).

Figure 3 Type of Comments for the Interactive Map
Figure 4 shows a heatmap of the interactive map comments. Areas with high densities of interactive map comments within American Canyon include Elliott Way between Benton Way and W American Canyon Road, James Road between Wilson Way and Donaldson Way W, Wetlands Edge Road, Donaldson Way E, Newell Drive, and Melvin Road.
c'. .,
E
E
0 40
30 20
10 0

2. May 9. May 16. May 23. May 30. May 6. Jun 13. Jun 20. Jun 27. Jun 4.Jul e Commen ts • Survey Responses
21 .4%
e Biking Comment
Pedestrian Comment
e Driving Comment
School Comment
Transit Comment

11. Jul 18. Jul 25. Jul 1. Aug
386
The Power of Commitment
12574952 3
Figure 4 Heatmap of Interactive Map Comments

2.3 Public Survey
The City of American Canyon Public Survey asked six primary questions relating to the LRSP. The survey received 44 responses as of July 14, 2022. The results from the survey are documented below.

1. What are the main roadway safety issues for American Canyon? Figure 5 Responses to Public Survey Question 1
I
I
Mezz J,aq
I
I
I
I
I
I
Wetlands EdgePark
DF09q
Henry
Raoch Park
9 '!:,•o, ,..,
Mjddlet~ r,
TnctorSu
Walmartc- u
Hol, d y
P. Su ' e N
menca
anyon
Lack of Infrastructure (sidewalks, turn lanes, etc.): 45 Distracted Driving: 42
Speed Related Collisions: 57
I '
I '
Napa Junction\
d Inn & Su tes
ott Napa
I
Newell
n Spar.e
Intersections: 61
Bicycle Collis ions and Safety: 30
Pedestrian Collisions and Safety: %
387
The Power of Commitment
12574952 4
Other safety issues and concerns identified by the public include:

Accidents
Additional bike paths that connect neighborhoods and provide an alternative to driving. Safer pedestrian and bike crossings for hwy 29 (Rio Del Mar, American Canyon Road, Donaldson Way) A lot of the streets are in poor condition. A lot of speeding on main roads that are used to go around HWY29 traffic and people not knowing how to use a stop sign. There are also portions that do not have sidewalks or ramps that make it difficult for people walking with strollers or handicap.

A lot of traffic in neighbors.

Alot of vehicles use Dan Rose and Elliott to bypass hwy 29 traffic. Cars are speeding, not paying attention and running stop signs. Suggesting Speed bumps - similar to what was added on Wetlands Edge near the new Napa Junction campus. Continued Police presence at school bus stops, Dan Rose drive and near schools during Commute time.

Anything to help with making people Stop instead of rolling through . Plus on 29 the lane that turns into the shopping center with Westamerica bank. Cars race Down the strip and at last minute shoot back Into traffic on many time going well over the painted white stripes, can raised white concrete and raised material to stop drivers from going over it.

Donaldson & Eucalyptus and Donaldson & Jana stop signs impact me directly.

Donaldson Way East/West stop light has grown into a major traffic back up intersection. A round about is a GREAT idea. it could be mirrored off of several larger roundabouts that have been successfully installed down towards Pebble Beach off of hwys 1 and 68 in Carmel Woods.

Drivers flying (speeding) through our residential streets, and hardly anyone stops at stop signs -they just blow through. It’s very unsafe on our residential roads.

Drivers -- particularly those younger than age 50 -- routinely drive beyond the posted speed limits. A notable number of drivers operate their vehicles while using a mobile device.

Drivers routinely drive beyond the posted 25MPH speed limit along Shenandoah Drive and Silver Oak Trail -- typically driving 30-40MPH (based both on my estimation and by way of the speed indicator on Shenandoah Dr.). About 30% of all drivers are driving while simultaneously attending to a mobile device. On rare occasion, drivers will run stop signs -- the few times I've seen this it was 100% young Black males. An extremely reckless act I increasingly observe regards drivers stopped on the railroad tracks (on American Canyon Road) while awaiting the to signal change; the drivers committing this unsafe act are overwhelmingly females of all ages.

Every day I see total disregard for safety like speeding, ignoring stop signs, endangering pedestrians etc.

Excessive speeding down Rio Del Mar. Running 4-way stops by schools.

Few residents seem concerned with speed and stop signs. As someone who has been hit by a car as a child and now has grandchildren living in American Canyon, I find the lack of enforcement unfortunate.

I hope it doesn't take a tragedy to make changes.

Google maps routes traffic through vintage ranch on Newell and then Donaldson so that it is non-stop traffic and people drive way to fast and ignore and blow through the stop signs. I see this almost daily.

Heavy volume of traffic on roads not designed to bear that level of traffic Hello I resigned at 20 Corrina Way in American Canyon I’m concerned about the speeding that on our street now. Corvina court was a private Court . It’s no longer a private Court . I think we should think about speed bumps. Also the Street light at night time. 388
The Power of Commitment
12574952 5
I live on Danrose and you'd never know there were stop signs at every corner if you just watched all the cars blowing through all day.

I live on Melvin Rd and it is the frontage road to highway 29. People use Melvin Road to keep from traveling on the conjested highway. It is particularly heavily traveled in early morning and afternoon during rush hour. People traveling on Melvin Road are very rude, speeding and overtake you while you are pulling out of your driveway. I realize there is no resolve to this issue but I wish drivers would be more considerate.

Inconsistent traffic flows, caused backups
Infrastruture is need on American Canyon Road leading to Hwy 80. No road divider or lights. We hear screeching all night long from cars speeding and braking. The lights on 29 thru AC are not timed and create a hellacious commute.

I see a lot of people running through stop signs and speeding in neighborhoods.

Its no secret we have too many cars commuting thru our town. Many using side streets to speed thru to avoid the traffic of the highway. There also needs to be more speed measure put into place near schools.

Las personas cada vez manejan muy distraídos y muy alta velocidad Many of the large setbacks and large parking lots on commercial lots make it danger ous for pedestrians to shop and dine out because there are many unmarked traffic lanes in the parking lot and there is a large space to traverse that is solely designed for cars. We should consider reducing free parking requirements on these businesses and create design standards that protect pedestrians who are crossing the parking lot that the businesses can opt into. It will be good for businesses, pedestrians, and the city.

Many streets are very crowded during peak morning rush and many children are walking to school.

People in vehicles speeding through intersections. More stop signs, speed bumps ands crossing walk lights could help. Also our streets are crowded with cars, trucks and RVs that never more or just rotate and block streets and views of driveways and crosswalks.

Mobile home parks with no speed bumps!!! Signs are posted for 10 MPH HOWEVER, after recently removing the speed bumps traffic goes 40-60 MPH on a daily basis No one stops at stop signs, lots of speeding. Traffic from the highway diverts to residential surface streets causing major problems in morning and evening commutes. I could go on and on and on and……
Not enough ada sidewalks
Not stopping for stop signs
On American canyon road people drive very fast. In order to curb this speeding maybe another stop sign or stop light would help.

People speeding on residential streets. People running stop signs. People doing donuts qnd burning rubber on residential streets/intersections.

People speed through the neighborhoods running stop signs.

Road discipline is in steep decline as drivers rush due to busy lives. Probably most of us fall in that category. A great tactic is simply to tell drivers to leave a little early to get there on time. This reduces a primary cause of accidents, namely rushing. If that doesn't work, traffic cameras can force better behavior and be a revenue stream for the city.
389
The Power of Commitment
12574952 6
Some motorist are either speeding or not stopping at the stop signs ( intersection of Broadway & Vine Terrace Way (by Montevino)
Some speed limits are too high for the streets. Tall plants at corners make it hard to see on coming traffic. When Newell drive and Summerwood are extended for Watson ranch please keep the speed limit 25mph on Summerwood and change Newell drive to 30 mph Speed bumps are very effective, and needed on Elliott Drive but....the City most likely will turn a blind eye to the possibility.

Speeding and not stopping at stop signs is a big problem.

Speeding is a big factor. Northampton Drive is a big cut thru street, reckless speeders every day.

Drivers blowing thru stop signs is also prevalent.

Speeding on James road between Donaldson and Crawford during rush hours.

Speeding on residential streets Need more stop signs
Speeding on residential streets where it is "25" and standard is 45 plus.

Stop signs. They are not followed by drivers they roll through them or just drive straight through them.

Was almost broad sided today by someone turning right never even slowed down to see if anyone was coming as he swung into my lane
The main safety issue is people driving 50 to 60 miles per hour down certain residential streets. West Donaldson and Eucalyptus to Wetlands edge to name a few. Another safety issue is all the pot holes from terribly maintained roads. People have to drive around the deep holes and go onto the wrong side of the road to do it.

There are roads in neighborhoods without proper sidewalks, which makes it dangerous for pedestrians.

Also the speeding and rush hour traffic on roads parallel to 29 are dangerous from people cutting around traffic on 29. There seems to be a lack of people stopping at stop signs and speeding in neighborhoods.

There have been a lot of incidents that have made my family feel unsafe in American Canyon, I would love if it were possible to install cameras on certain parts of the city to reduce crime rates.

There should be a 4-way stop in Marla x Elliot and Marla x Danrose due to blind spots brought about by curved road.

The speedway/Race track on Newell Dr at night. Someone is going to get really hurt one night. The number of speeding trucks (especially heavy construction trucks) running stop signs and crossing over the line. Plus we havea residence on Granite Springs Way who likes to race his dark green Mustang with loud pipes up and down the street at all hours of the day and night The traffic on Elliott Dr, between Benton/DonaldsonWay and American Canyon Road. This is a main road for before and after school auto traffic and kids walking and riding their bikes. People driving on Elliott are going extremely fast, which presents a safety issue for our kids, people walking their dogs and the people stopping at the fruit vendor on the corner. Maybe speed bumps or rumble strips could help to slow the traffic
This is the same for all cities. People with no talent not paying attention Too many large RV's parked on streets that obstruct views, especially near intersect ion. These same RVs are left in the same parking spot for longer than 72hours. The police do not follow up as needed with these situations. Bicyclists should not be allowed to share the sidewalk with pedestrians on Wetlands Edge Rd. It was a terrible decision to allow that. A bicycle lane should be added on Wetlands Edge Rd.
390
The Power of Commitment
12574952 7
Too many people speeding up and down quiet neighborhoods. Also, Taking residential streets to avoid signals at 29!
Traffic and driver behavior is a big problem throughout the state, but we definitely have our fair share of problems that the city needs to address and help mitigate.

Traffic speeds are unsafe. Speed cushions decreased speeding on the 500 block by 54%! We are tracking cars and their speeds as they pass our house. This speed study has been underway for twoyears. A similar study was conducted in the 500 block of Wetlands Edge. After speed cushions, speeding reduced from 72% to 18%. Excessive speeding (>35mph) has decreased to one -half percent!!! Traffic calming works! More please - the length of Wetlands Edge.

We need more sidewalks to walk safely around town and from east side to west side of the city Wetlands edge continued Ed to be a problem for speeders. The end towards Kensington does not have any sign indicating the road ends. In the past 3 years we have had numerous accidents with residents cars being damaged. City property has been damaged and fencing destroyed. The fence remains damaged still.

You can't fix stupid. 1) darting across the Hwy 29 divider to enter the Union 76 gas station from the Southbound left turn lane. 2) Completely and utterly misjudging the differential in speed between Hwy 29 50-ish mph traffic and right turn from a feeder onto Hwy 29 from a complete standstill. 3) Pick a lane, any lane, be clear what lane you are in. But you can address Vehicle Code issues: 1) "California Stops" that aren't even close (all 4 way stops); or, take a turn at speed (slowing only to not roll over) (W Am Can Rd and Elliot, W Am Can Rd and Wetlands Edge) 2) Bicyclists that don't realize the Vehicle Code applies to them (signalling, stopping at stop signs/traffic lights). 3) Distracted driving, not using hands free devices.

2. Are you familiar with the City’s traffic calming program? Figure 6 Responses to Public Survey Question 2
Yes: 37
391
The Power of Commitment
12574952 8

3. Do you find the traffic calming program difficult to navigate or understand? Figure 7 Responses to Public Survey Question 3

4. What changes would make the program easier to navigate/understand? Add more lanes
Easier process to submit a project for traffic calming
I am familiar that the city has a recently adopted traffic calming program, started as a response to overwhelming complaints about road safety. What makes the program hard to understand is lack of transparency. We don’t know what you are doing. The city needs to not just provide traffic calming where people have recently fought hard to get it like Wetlands Edge. The city needs to adopt a working program where dangerous road conditions are sought after and dealt with. Example: on Eucalyptus by West Donaldson, no one can walk on the side walk toward Wetland’s edge because the dead grass and weeds at the lot the city owns have overtaken the sidewalk. We have to go into the road and pray someone is not coming up the road in a car at 60 miles per hour cutting the corner sharply and hitting us. If the city is going to own a large lot of weeds by homes, the weeds should be maintained. It is a fire hazard and a pedestrian hazard. We should not have to keep repeatedly complaining about it. The citizens have a right to safety and we have a right know what you are doing to keep us safe. This is why we pay taxes.

Improvements in both communication, awareness and understanding have already started. Clearing hurdles around who needs to approve and securing funds would help.

Make it easier to locate by putting on the front page of the City website in "blue/green box" like the construction updates, community calendar, etc.

Make the resolve to the issues more appealing, ex. Speed humps on Wetlands Edge are ugly and only put where people complain instead of the entire road.

Most traffic calming has been very good. A few traffic calming improvements seem to be overengineered. For example sidewalk corner bump-outs ended up being too large for Donaldson Way / Yes: 11
No: 26
392
The Power of Commitment
12574952 9
James Road intersection and had to be scaled back. It would have been helpful to test the sizes of the bump-outs with temporary barriers before pouring the concrete. none
None. ( Done motorist don’t read/understand traffic rules!) Once you introduce round-abouts, you'll need an VERY EXTENSIVE education campaign.

Stop it!!
Streamline some of the paperwork. Make it easier to initiate traffic calming study, but still require a majority of residents to support road changes. Work out the conflict between tenants and property owners.

The barrier of entry is very high and the city ignores some requests for traffic calming - even when the majority of a specific neighborhood have requested help.

The extreme bump outs at some intersection are a hazard. Longer speed bumps would make more sense than the bump outs

5. What roadway safety improvements would you like to see in and around school zones? 15 miles per hour enforced
Add divider
add same traffic calming humps on 'all roads' leading up to schools, particularly the elementary and middle schools. Maybe at 75 yards and 25 yards prior to the school site or pedestrian crossing areas.

All of the schools should have the safety lights at the crosswalk like the ones at the elementary school at Eucalyptus and Wetlands edge.
better crosswalks, improved directions for drop-off cars (busing would be the best option to limit cars). more crossing guards to help with pedestrian and car flow.

Better response to speeding
Better stop sign alignment, flags, possibly speed bumps near schools and parks.

Cameras
Cameras so parents can get tickets for U turns in front of people and in intersections.

Change traffic light by high school so each side has a protected turn arrow. That is a major cause of traffic and safety issues. Impatient drivers will turn within inches of students in the crosswalk nearly hitting them
Crossing guards and police presence
Crossing guards to help foot traffic as well as street traffic during peak hours.

Crosswalk attendants
Definitive turn lanes and holding pattern for pick-up. Sadly this is an accident waiting to happen.

Enforced speeding and running stop signs.

Enforcement: drivers, cyclists, pedestrians.

Enforcement of speed limits.

Flashing crosswalk lights on the ground.
393
The Power of Commitment
12574952 10
Flashing crosswalks at all schools. Police department present every morning and every school dismissal.

Get rid of bottlenecks
Greater enforcement, including significantly increased fines, and limiting left turns while, also, considering a further reduction of speed limits.

Improved or complete sidewalk connections to allow children to walk to school. Add safe bike routes so children can bike to school.

Improved pedestrian crossing mechanisms
I would like to see speed bumps on both Newell and Donaldson. I would like to see about 4 x more crosswalks in Vintage Ranch with flashers, especially near Shenandoah park. There are not enough crosswalks across Newell and not enough across Shenandoah. ( Every 1/4 mile is too far for a cross walk.) It is only a matter of time before someone is killed crossing Donaldson because the heavy traffic and people literally going 50 mph past the police station. Hey - why doesn’t the police install a speed trap camera there and just send tickets to anyone going over 35 mph? Lighted crosswalks
Más vigilancia
Modified Pick up and Drop off times,
More clearly marked bicycle lanes and pedestrian walkways in residential areas and more crossing guards for busy intersections. Also some educational signs and city communication, cars don't always know they're supposed to yield to pedestrians and bicycles.

More crack downs on racing and speeding
more crossing guards at all Elementary, Middle and High Schools.

More crossing guards at large intersections.

More crossing guards, parents could also volunteer to assist More efficient pick up/drop off systems. More sidewalks.

More illuminated signs showing how fast cars are going! Enforcement! There is rarely any police officers at any schools!
More lightup crosswalks, more road bumps like wetlands edge..

More measures to slow down speeders thru the side streets.

More police patrols during high traffic times. Speed bumps/controls.

More police presence during school starts and outs. Especially at the 4-way intersections. Speed bumps put on Rio Del Mar to slow people down. I have seen animals hit, near misses on people and cars.

More specific flow during school times. More crossing guards and education around keeping our neighborhood safe.

More speed bumps.

More speed humps and all around measures to slow drivers down.

More visible law enforcement.
394
The Power of Commitment
12574952 11
Parents picking up their children should not be allowed to double park in front of the schools, or in the middle of the school parking lots, for extended periods of time, waiting for their children.

PD watching the school intersections. Traffics patrol by school officials. Start sighting people for not stopping at stop signs and for speeding
Pedestrian Beacons.

Perhaps blinking crosswalks so drivers see a pedestrian is crossing Potholes fixed
Reduced speed limits to 15 mph around neighborhoods within 500 feet of schools ( which can be enacted by Council per AB 321)
Safe walkways for students, even across the highway.

Sidewalks
Slowing traffic and mitigation of traffic
Speed bumbs and traffic lights where it’s appropriate.

Speed bumps
Speed Bumps
Speed bumps & cameras
Speed Bumps in Hummingbird Way Cars are flying before and after school starts ( ACMS ) Speed bumps or more cops present
Stop sign enforcement.

Stop sign in more places to slow traffic down in residence streets. More radar endorecment Stop signs at Canyon Oaks. Speed limit enforcement. Maybe another crosswalk for the HS kids that J walk across Newell
Streetlights instead of people directing traffic.

Targeted speed enforcement around school zones.
the corner of Benton/Donaldson and Elliott Dr. is a 4-way stop, but I see many people running that stop sign every day. They also run the stop sign by the Boys and Girls Club at Chaseur.

The issue is not the roadways -- which are fine. Rather, the issue resides squarely with the drivers.

California does not require recurring driving competency assessments ( like it did in the 1960s and 1970s), and as a result the driving culture of Californians has shifted from that of an earned "privilege" to that of an expected "right". Add to this the cultural shifts seen in the past 25 years and one can understand why the average American driver is increasingly self-absorbed and clearly less socially concerned.

The new elementary school is causing traffic on Wetlands Edge drive. Parents queue on that road northbound to drop off and pick up their children. Eucalyptus Westbound is wide enough to accommodate the traffic queues but Wetlands Edge is not. Some drivers drive up the left side to turn right, which is dangerous. Please prevent drivers from going straight from Wetlands during pick up and drop-off. This is exactly the same as the old elementary school setup so we have a direct precedent.

The state allows speed reduction to 15MPH around schools. We should look at that, plus adding rumble strips or speed humps. Parents are sometimes the biggest speeding offenders. 395
The Power of Commitment
12574952 12
Touch ups on road lines to have more visibility.

Traffic calming on streets leading to schools, especially around the middle school - Hummingbird Way Traffic enforcement and signage to reduce speed limits to 15 mph around neighborhoods within 500 feet of schools (which can be enacted by Council per CA law AB 321) https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=200720080AB321

6. What other roadway safety improvements would you like to see? A bicycle lane on Wetlands Edge Rd.

ACPD to start giving tickets. No consequences, no one cares.

A project to create a road to avoid traffic
Better accessibility for disabled citizens better traffic lights Better bike trails, possibly decided from the roadway.

Better markings and caution lights for crosswalks.

Better paved roads, better times stop lights, should be able to drive from one end of town to another, if following the speed limit, without encountering a red light.

Better roads and better enforcement of speed violations Clearly marked walking and bike lanes. Many pedestrians walking the hwy along the should/breakdown areas. Better merge lanes (where they exist) to the hwy.

Complete SR29 improvements and the Newell extension, so there will be less cut through traffic on local streets, and offer an alternate route when there an accident on SR29.

Fix the worn out roads Need more stop signs
Get rid of the merger lane at the entrance of American Canyon road at the intersection of Flosom and American Canyon Road.

Giant underpass for highway 29/broadway and allow cross streets to flow better Highway 29 needs a new image and underpass connections for pedestrians safety.

I know police can't be everywhere all the time but increased enforcement would help I would like to see lower speed limits on Danrose Drive along with speed limit signs. We have a lot of accidents and people drive so fast it is ridiculous and dangerous. Check the police department records of the crashes on Danrose Drive. Please help this street. Even speed bumps would be a great help.

Less congestion
Less stop signs. Wider streets. Fix potholes. Roads in the city are so bumpy.

License plate readers on the highway.
main road, heavily auto-use, non traffic lighted intersections should be reworked to be round-a-bouts.

This could easy speeding, allow for continuous flow, and open up difficult areas (or turns) to merging automobiles.

Maintain the streets better
396
The Power of Commitment
12574952 13
Make sure roads are clearly and properly stripped. The white or yellow lines are not faded. If the road need replaced get it done.

More lanes on Hwy 29 and a freeway overpass through town! More lighted crosswalks. improve the street paving, FIXING the large number of manhole covers that are no longer flush with the rest of the street.

More measures to reduce speed on our side streets.

More sidewalk
more sidewalks
More sidewalks and better crosswalks marking. Especially around parks. e.g. Around almost Elliott Park that extend the length of the west side. It crosses multiple roads that have very bad curb drops or miss-aligned curbs forcing. Some on blind corners with evidence of speeders and "side-show" donut marks.

More sidewalks on school routes. The intersection of Rio Del Mar and American Canyon Road seems to have a lot of rear-ending accidents, maybe it needs a flashing light to warn when the signal is about to change or better timing with the other signals around it? more speed buttons (?) at intersections, perhaps in an X pattern, preventing donuts and speeding car thru the intersections
More striping within crosswalks to make them more visible no idea how you get people to stop at stop signs, but it would be nice. Safer crossing for highway 29.

Biking and walking are difficult.

On Donaldson Way in Broadway I would like to see handicap assessability walking from . From the gas station across the railroad tracks
People do donuts at Newell and Donaldson on weekend nights and speed and drag race there. Plus they blow through the stop sign. This is only going to get much, much worse when the road is expanded. This is a suburban neighborhood and it is now a major thoroughfare but the city seems to be completely ignoring that fact even though the police/fire department must be aware.

Pothole management in all neighborhoods
Put signal lights for left turn lanes to blinking red when opposing traffic is absent from from view, rather than waiting for a full signal cycle. Also longer left turn lanes would help thru traffic.

Red light runner cameras More police patrol at intersections Reduce speed on Flosden.

Re paving American Canyon Rd toward 80
Roadway safety strategies at stop signs, lights and unmarked intersections. Safe pedestrian crossings on SR29.

Safe bike routes to allow the community to bike around the city for work, pleasure or school Safe sidewalks
Sidewalk repair and put sidewalks in where there aren’t any.

Sidewalks
Sidewalks!
397
The Power of Commitment
12574952 14
Sidewalks along 29 especially by rio Del Mar. Lots of kids walk along to roadside.

Sidewalks and clearly marked bike lanes on main streets to protect pedestrians and bicyclists.

Especially an alternative path along the east side of Highway 29 for pedestrians and cyclists to go from American Canyon Road to Napa Junction - for east side residents to get to the WalMart shopping center.

Sidewalks on both sides of the street, throughout McKniight Acres. Repave all streets.

Smoother and even pavements along highway 29.

Something in the crosswalk that slows cars down so they cannot just blow through the crosswalk and speed down the road. One example is West Donaldson and Eucalyptus. So much speeding and reckless driving.

Speed bumps/controls. Giving fines to cars that park on top of sidewalks in the Rancho del Mar neighborhood. Many vehicles park on the sidewalk which is already small making it more difficult for pedestrians to walk safely.

Speed bumps in 25 mph streets. More ticketing and pullovers for driving infractions.

Speed bumps in neighborhoods. People driving fast.

Speed bumps on Dan Rose near the bus stop. Flashing lights at the cross walk.

Speed cushions in Elliott Dr Stop sign at Crawford Way and Elliott Dr speed monitoring signs on streets where cars frequently speed, pedestrian islands for crossing hwy 29, more share the road messaging, green bike lanes in high traffic areas Stop sign violators are a danger to pedestrians, other drivers and each other. Enforcement with additional officers. We've seen it working in targeted areas, but there are so many violators throughout the city. They are our own neighbors, we know.

Streets repaired, stop sign brighter
The crosswalk on Rio Del Mar and highway 29 needs to he relocated further south of red light. Where it is presently located causes traffic turning left onto highway 29 to stop and traffic backs up and people get restless because the light is short.

There should also be a stop light at Kimberly x 29 esp for those turning left to 29 from Kimberly.

Time hwy 29 and Rio del mar on the same schedule to help traffic flow. Roundabouts will not help, they will just move traffic backup to the side streets. With a steady flow of traffi On hwy 29 due to roundabouts cars on side streets will have a difficult time entering roundabouts ( will happen at soscal junction too). What we need are better timedlights an maybe an extra lane. Every where has traffic during commute timesits normal.

To combat continuous increasing traffic, build a freeway connecting Vallejo to Napa. (Doing so is the only logical solution at this time given 40+years of immigration patterns from Central America indicate California' s population will continue to increase unabated.) Use of more speed humps in parts of town that have become SR 29 bypass routes, additional class I bicycle lanes, sidewalks built-out throughout town and undergrounding of utility poles.

Walking path along 29. You have to walk through a bunch of meandering neighborhoods to get up and down 29 safely.

Walking path along the side of the highway towards the local stores to residential areas. 398
The Power of Commitment
12574952 15

7. Additional Comments
Can someone please pay attention to why the congestion is so bad and ignored in and out of AC? During fires in the Newell Open Space (and we’ve had 2) we need about 10 times more police presence to keep the looky loos away from blocking our evacuation route in case the fire would jump Newell. This was an extremely dangerous situation last year and there was absolutely no Sheriff deputys on hand to help manage this. Only volunteers. Luckily it didn’t jump Newell - but what if that would have happened? No one living in houses with evacuation orders would have been able to get out of their culdesacs due to looky loos blocking it with their cars so that they could post on Instagram.

It was a huge failure of the city to not protect everyone from this potential disaster.

I know hwy 29 is caltrans but they honestly need to make it an underpass with off ramps for those who live or want to shop in our town.

I know my comments don't mean squat to anyone, but...

I think the city has been very lucky that there hasn’t been more serous injury/fatalities to pedestrians.

Keep us safe and informed.

Love the traffic calming changes on Wetlands Edge
Many people cross the street at dangerous places, spend time sitting or standing in the street or the median, and live in disused street parking and commercial parking lots. I think all this behavior would be reduced if American Canyon embraced Vallejo's supportive housing initiative using HomeKey money to build a supportive housing facility.

Many thanks for initiating the LRSP
More police patrols are needed during peak traffic times especially on Theresa Ave, Los Altos Dr. and Rio del Mar. Too many cars run stop signs and drive at excessive speed as they avoid the traffic on highway 29. It's dangerous for other drivers, cyclists and pedestrians.

No more housing projects. Needs were meet with Watson ranch ,canyon estates, and new ones by 7 -

11. Building on oat hill near a fault line is ridiculous. Please reduce apartmentsfor napa cove so there is proper parking. Please notify all residents for any projects becauseit affectsthe city as a whole not just those living in the immediate area,
Our local police need to do a better job enforcing parking and traffic laws. Too many people are allowed to block the sidewalks with their vehicles, and monopolize street parking.

PLEASE DO NOT USE MY EMAIL ADDRESS TO ANYONE!!! I do not want any repercussions from my landlord!
Roads need to be repaired and repaved.

Thanks for the survey. Keep harping!
Thank you for your consideration and taking up this survey.

Thank you for your work to improve traffic in American Canyon! The boys and girls responsible for managing the applicable infrastructure need to convert CA -29 into a freeway between CA-37 and Napa. Unfortunately, this will never happen... because none of these people truly care.

The problems seem to be mostly bad, impatient drivers. I think AC has very nice sidewalks and streets The traffic calming program needs to be set for periodic review, maybe every 4 years. As we are doing a review now, we should be thorough and gather as much information as possible. Additionally, 399
The Power of Commitment
12574952 16
information on how citizens can record speeds and other traffic infractions should be included in the plan.

Wish for an overpass over American canyon road
Next Steps
In moving forward with the LRSP process, the next step is to incorporate the comments from the public in the draft LRSP. Once the draft LRSP is complete, it will be sent to the County for review. 400
The Power of Commitment
12574952 17
Attachment 1
Interactive Map Comments
401
9 8
7 6
5 43
2 1
9998
97 9695
94 93
92 91
90 89
88 87
86 8584
83 82
8180
79 78
77 76
75 74
73 72
71 70
69 68
67 66
65 64
63 6261
60 59
58 5756
55 54
5352
50 48
47 46
45 44
43 42
41 40
39 3837 36
35 34
33 3231
30 29
28 27
26 252423
22 21
20 19
18 17
16 15
14 13
12 10
293
292291290
288287
286285
284
283
282
281
280
279
278
277
276
275274 273272 270269
268
267
266265264263
262
261
260259
258257
256255
253
251
249
248
247
246
245244
243
242 241
240
238
237
235
234
233
232
231230
229
228
227
226
225
224
223
222
221
220
219
218
217
216
215
214213
212
211210
208
207
206
205
204
203
202
201
199
197
196
195
194
188
185
183
180179
178
176
175
174
173
170
169
168
167
166
164163
158157
156
155
150
149
148
146
143
142
139
137
136135134133
131
130
129
128
126
121
120
118
117
116
111110
107105104
102
101
100
FIGURE 1
0 0.15 0.3 0.45 0.6
Miles
Project No.

Revision No.-
12574952
Date 08/11/2022

CITY OF AMERICAN CANYONLOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN
Map Projection: Mercator Auxiliary SphereHorizontal Datum: WGS 1984Grid: WGS 1984 Web Mercator Auxiliary Sphere Paper Size ANSI A
o
kbryantN:\ mxdPrint US\ San Luis Obispo\ Projects\ 561\12574952\ GIS\ Maps\ Working\ Public Comments1. Data source: Esri, HERE, Garmin, ( c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community. Created by:
date: 10 Aug 2022 - 11:13
Legend
Type
BikingComment
DrivingComment
PedestrianComment
SchoolComment
TransitComment
City Limits

PUBLIC COMMENT LOCATIONS
Green Island Rd
American Canyon Rd
NewellRd
W American Canyon Rd
Eucalyptus Dr
Benton Way
Donaldson Wy E
FlosdenRd
Rio Del Mar
Wetl andsEdgeRd
Napa Junction Rd
Kimberly Dr
Com merceBlvd
Paol iLoopRd Watson Ln
Broadway
Oak Trl
Silver
i
i .... __ _
j
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i ...
1·
i
L·-··-··-·1
i
i•-••-••-••,._ I
402
Interactive Map Comments
ID Created on Type Comment
Up
Votes
Down
Votes
View on map Response to Comment
1 5/12/2022 14:01
Driving
Comment
The drivers turning from Flosden on to American Canyon need better lane guidance for the turn. Also, during school hours, keep crossing guards staffed. 2 0
https:// ghd. mysocia
lpinpoint. com/ ameri
can- canyonlrsp/map#/ marker/ 3
00904
Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment. This
location is addressed in the LRSP.
2 5/12/2022 14:03
Driving
Comment
Speed bumps should be in place for Via Bellagio. Drivers are going excessive speed on this road and there are children walking to school plus with bus pickup/drop-off that are endangered by this activity.1 0 https:// ghd.mysocia
lpinpoint. com/ ameri
can- canyonlrsp/map#/ marker/ 3
00905
Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment.

Speeding/ aggressive driving is addressed as a priority in this report.
3 5/12/2022 14:05
Driving
Comment
Drivers going west to east on American Canyon Road are doing so over the speed limit. There are numerous close calls with cars turning into Safeway complex at gas station and Starbucks.
2 0
https:// ghd.mysocia
lpinpoint. com/ ameri
can- canyonlrsp/map#/ marker/ 3
00906
Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment. This
location as well as speeding/ aggressive driving are
addressed as a priority in this report.
4 5/12/2022 14:06
Biking
Comment
There are no bike lanes provided on Highway 29. Pedestrians are also at risk when attempting to walk or cross over.
2 0
https:// ghd.mysocia
lpinpoint. com/ ameri
can- canyonlrsp/map#/ marker/ 3
00907
Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment.

There are planned multimodal improvements for SR 29.
5 5/12/2022 15:06
Driving
Comment
People speeding continuously especially before school and after school buuut at all times
2 0
https:// ghd.mysocia
lpinpoint. com/ ameri
can- canyonlrsp/map#/ marker/ 3
00913
Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment.

Speeding/ aggressive driving is addressed as a priority in this report.
6 5/12/2022 17:00
Driving
Comment
This intersection requires a 4-way stop; Donaldson runs on a hill, and has no stop signs ( which Gisela does) and drivers invariably go too fast downhill from west to east. There are many kids who live in this area & amp; play in the street. 1 0
https:// ghd.mysocia
lpinpoint. com/ ameri
can- canyonlrsp/map#/ marker/ 3
00923
Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment.

Intersection safety is addressed as a priority in the
LRSP. To install an All-Way Stop, the intersection
would need to meet CA MUTCD warrants.
7 5/12/2022 17:02
Driving
Comment
Eucalyptus requires speed bumps or rumble strips - drivers take this back road well over the speed limit, especially headed west/downhill towards the school, and around the bend where I placed the marker. The bend is a nearly- blind curve.

Considering current traffic plans will route more cars along this road, speed bumps will decrease the danger to pedestrians on the south sidewalk, and students at the school.
1 0
https:// ghd.mysocia
lpinpoint. com/ ameri
can- canyonlrsp/map#/ marker/ 3
00926
Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment.

Speeding/ aggressive driving is addressed as a priority in this report.
8 5/12/2022 17:04
Driving
Comment
This is another intersection that, if it had a complete 4-way stop, would prevent drivers from taking the downward slope of Donaldson too quickly - at present, it is a hazard, and it is dangerous to turn left onto Elke from eastbound Donaldson, since you can't see who's coming over the hill on the westbound side. 1 0
https:// ghd.mysocia
lpinpoint. com/ ameri
can- canyonlrsp/map#/ marker/ 3
00929
Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment.

Intersection safety is addressed as a priority in the
LRSP. To install an All-Way Stop, the intersection
would need to meet CA MUTCD warrants.
9 5/12/2022 17:09
Driving
Comment
We need multiple radar- sensored speed signs that flash at you when you go over the speed limit, along the 29. The long downhill slope moving northbound is a good place for ACPD to nab speeders with radar guns, but it'd be nice if they didn' t have to.
1 0
https:// ghd.mysocia
lpinpoint. com/ ameri
can- canyonlrsp/map#/ marker/ 3
00930
Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment.

Speeding/ aggressive driving is addressed as a priority in this report.
10 5/12/2022 17:21
Driving
Comment
People use Kimberly as a way around traffic but people use it as a highway. There have been multiple time someone has crashed into the houses adjacent to hwy 29 from going too fast and you can rarely pull out of your driveway. The road conditions are also terrible and cars kick up rocks onto the sidewalk and into cars parked. 1 0
https:// ghd.mysocia
lpinpoint. com/ ameri
can- canyonlrsp/map#/ marker/ 3
00931
Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment.

Speeding/ aggressive driving is addressed as a priority in this report.
11 5/12/2022 18:28
Pedestrian
Comment
Need a full side walk along this road with wheelchair ramps 1 0 https:// ghd.mysocia
lpinpoint. com/ ameri
can- canyonlrsp/map#/ marker/ 3
00940
Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment.

Sidewalk improvements and installation are
recommended in the LRSP.
12 5/12/2022 18:29
Driving
Comment
Continue the road repairs 1 0
https:// ghd.mysocia
lpinpoint. com/ ameri
can- canyonlrsp/map#/ marker/ 3
00941
Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment. Your
comment will be passed along to the City.
13 5/12/2022 18:33
Driving
Comment
Road repair 1 0
https:// ghd.mysocia
lpinpoint. com/ ameri
can- canyonlrsp/map#/ marker/ 3
00943
Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment. Your
comment will be passed along to the City.
14 5/12/2022 19:39
Driving
Comment
Lately there has been a lot of fast driving and near miss accidents around this area..

It is an area of concern because there are many kids that play around this area in front of their homes.
3 0
https:// ghd.mysocia
lpinpoint. com/ ameri
can- canyonlrsp/map#/ marker/ 3
00950
Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment.

Speeding/ aggressive driving is addressed as a priority in this report.
15 5/12/2022 19:41
Pedestrian
Comment
Would love to see some kind of pedestrian bridge built on this road.. it would provide access for children walking from school and also encourage residents to exercise or even walk to local stores.
2 0
https:// ghd.mysocia
lpinpoint. com/ ameri
can- canyonlrsp/map#/ marker/ 3
00952
Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment.

Pedestrian safety is addressed as a priority in this
report.
16 5/12/2022 20:53
Pedestrian
Comment
Need sidewalk 0 0
https:// ghd.mysocia
lpinpoint. com/ ameri
can- canyonlrsp/map#/ marker/ 3
00962
Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment.

Sidewalk improvements and installation are
recommended in the LRSP.
17 5/12/2022 20:54
Driving
Comment
Roundabout here with bike and pedal crossing 1 0
https:// ghd.mysocia
lpinpoint. com/ ameri
can- canyonlrsp/map#/ marker/ 3
00963
Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment.

Intersection safety is addressed as a priority in the
LRSP. To install a roundabout, the intersection would
need to meet CA MUTCD warrants.
18 5/12/2022 20:55
Driving
Comment
A underpass is needed here 0 0
https:// ghd.mysocia
lpinpoint. com/ ameri
can- canyonlrsp/map#/ marker/ 3
00964
Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment.

There are planned multimodal improvements for SR 29.
19 5/12/2022 22:39
Driving
Comment
Drivers routinely drive above the posted 25MPH speed limit. The average speed appears to be 30-40MPH ( based on the speed indicator and personal estimation). 2 0
https:// ghd.mysocia
lpinpoint. com/ ameri
can- canyonlrsp/map#/ marker/ 3
00971
Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment.

Speeding/ aggressive driving is addressed as a priority in this report.

I I I I I I I
403
ID Created on Type Comment
Up
Votes
Down
Votes
View on map Response to Comment
20 5/12/2022 22:45
Driving
Comment
Drivers routinely drive above the posted 25MPH speed limit. The average speed appears to be 30-40MPH ( based on personal estimation).

Also consider relocating the center stripe closer to the "east-bound side". Currently, the stripe is centered; however, given parking is allowed only on the "west-bound side", more roadway could be freed- up to the west-bound drivers, which would promote an overall safer roadway.
1 0
https:// ghd. mysocia
lpinpoint. com/ ameri
can- canyonlrsp/map#/ marker/ 3
00973
Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment.

Speeding/ aggressive driving is addressed as a priority in this report.
21 5/13/2022 8:15
Pedestrian
Comment
Need police presence and or Crossing guards to keep our kids from being hit.

Drivers ignore the stop signs and are too impatient with pedestrians. 0 0
https:// ghd.mysocia
lpinpoint. com/ ameri
can- canyonlrsp/map#/ marker/ 3
01004
Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment.

Speeding/ aggressive driving as well as increased
enforcement are addressed as priorities in this report. 22 5/13/2022 8:16
Driving
Comment
Drivers speed down this street every morning. Running the stop signs. Putting pedestrians and bikers at risk.
1 0
https:// ghd.mysocia
lpinpoint. com/ ameri
can- canyonlrsp/map#/ marker/ 3
01006
Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment.

Speeding/ aggressive driving as well as increased
enforcement are addressed as priorities in this report. 23 5/14/2022 9:45
Driving
Comment
Continue replacing the roads. No more big rigs through the neighborhood! 0 0 https:// ghd.mysocia
lpinpoint. com/ ameri
can- canyonlrsp/map#/ marker/ 3
01150
Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment. Your
comment will be passed along to the City.
24 5/14/2022 9:46
Pedestrian
Comment
Sidewalks need lots of improvement 0 0
https:// ghd.mysocia
lpinpoint. com/ ameri
can- canyonlrsp/map#/ marker/ 3
01151
Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment.

Sidewalk improvements and installation are
recommended in the LRSP.
25 5/14/2022 9:48
Driving
Comment
People ignore the stop sign here and drive way too fast. 0 0 https:// ghd.mysocia
lpinpoint. com/ ameri
can- canyonlrsp/map#/ marker/ 3
01152
Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment.

Speeding/ aggressive driving as well as increased
enforcement are addressed as priorities in this report. 26 5/14/2022 9:53
Pedestrian
Comment
Sidewalks! Taking a walk would be much safer with sidewalks on Melvin. Cars drive way too fast on this road
0 0
https:// ghd.mysocia
lpinpoint. com/ ameri
can- canyonlrsp/map#/ marker/ 3
01154
Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment.

Sidewalk improvements and installation are
recommended in the LRSP.
27 5/14/2022 9:57
Driving
Comment
Traffic enforcement at this intersection. Many drivers roll right through the stop signs without stopping.
1 0
https:// ghd.mysocia
lpinpoint. com/ ameri
can- canyonlrsp/map#/ marker/ 3
01155
Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment.

Speeding/ aggressive driving as well as increased
enforcement are addressed as priorities in this report. 28 5/14/2022 9:58
Biking
Comment
A dedicated bike lane would be nice along this road. I worry for the people I see biking on these roads.
0 0
https:// ghd.mysocia
lpinpoint. com/ ameri
can- canyonlrsp/map#/ marker/ 3
01156
Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment.

Bicycle safety is addressed as a priority in the LRSP.
29 5/16/2022 0:28
Driving
Comment
During commute hours, I have seen many vehicles using the shoulder and/or turn lanes on both side of 29 to bypass traffic illegally and at unsafe speeds at the intersection of Broadway & amp; Napa Junction Rd. One of many reasons I choose not to commute to work on my bike.
0 0
https:// ghd.mysocia
lpinpoint. com/ ameri
can- canyonlrsp/map#/ marker/ 3
01283
Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment.

Speeding/ aggressive driving as well as increased
enforcement are addressed as priorities in this report. 30 5/19/2022 19:47
Driving
Comment
I often see people not stopping at this stop sign. I don't mean " California stop" either, they don't even seem to slow down. Most often, I notice it during commute traffic in the morning.
0 0
https:// ghd.mysocia
lpinpoint. com/ ameri
can- canyonlrsp/map#/ marker/ 3
02169
Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment.

Speeding/ aggressive driving as well as increased
enforcement are addressed as priorities in this report. 31 5/20/2022 19:55
Driving
Comment
Cars speed on Elliott. Cars often don’t stop when making a right from Kimberly onto Elliott. We have kids and feel the crosswalks and sidewalks are dangerous because of the cars. For example our neighbors car was totaled while parked on Elliott. When I do yard work next to the street our neighbors express concern about being hit by speeding cars.
0 0
https:// ghd.mysocia
lpinpoint. com/ ameri
can- canyonlrsp/map#/ marker/ 3
02370
Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment.

Speeding/ aggressive driving is addressed as a priority in this report.
32 5/20/2022 19:59
Driving
Comment
Cars drive too fast on Kimberly. The street is exceptionally wide, which facilitates speeding. I what traffic calming measures might lower speeds and improve the aesthetic of the street? Street trees or shrubs? There’ s a lot of room for improvement on Kimberly between 29 and Elliott.
0 0
https:// ghd.mysocia
lpinpoint. com/ ameri
can- canyonlrsp/map#/ marker/ 3
02371
Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment.

Speeding/ aggressive driving is addressed as a priority in this report.
33 5/20/2022 20:03
Biking
Comment
When biking or walking to the parking lot between DWES, BGC, and ACMS it’s awkward to cross Benton. The crosswalks don’t align with the driveway. Making the left onto Benton from this parking lot is very difficult on bike with school traffic. It’s especially sketchy when biking with kids
0 0
https:// ghd.mysocia
lpinpoint. com/ ameri
can- canyonlrsp/map#/ marker/ 3
02372
Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment. This
location is addressed in the LRSP.
34 5/21/2022 7:05
Pedestrian
Comment
Bicycle / pedestrian path from dog park to tennis & amp; basketball courts to community garden -- need crosswalk on these streets, please and would be nice if the curb drops lined up to minimize time to cross the street 0 0
https:// ghd.mysocia
lpinpoint. com/ ameri
can- canyonlrsp/map#/ marker/ 3
02396
Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment.

Pedestrian safety is addressed as a priority in this
report.
35 5/22/2022 17:07
Driving
Comment
Corner of Rio Grande and West Carolyn should be a 4-way stop sign. The curve on Rio Grande is somewhat blind and large vehicles often are parked, legally, but making it hard t o see cross- traffic if you are stopped at West Carolyn. 1 0
https:// ghd.mysocia
lpinpoint. com/ ameri
can- canyonlrsp/map#/ marker/ 3
02597
Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment.

Intersection safety is addressed as a priority in the
LRSP. To install an All-Way Stop, the intersection
would need to meet CA MUTCD warrants.
36 5/22/2022 17:14
Driving
Comment
Lots of speeding on Melvin during commute hours. Speed humps might slow everyone down and make this a safer street.
0 0
https:// ghd.mysocia
lpinpoint. com/ ameri
can- canyonlrsp/map#/ marker/ 3
02599
Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment.

Speeding/ aggressive driving is addressed as a priority in this report.
37 5/23/2022 11:22
Driving
Comment
Speeding cars, heavy traffic during school drop off/pick up times, dangerous conditions for kids/pets/elderly when crossing street to walk along wetlands edge trail. Requesting traffic calming in the form of speed cushions as installed in the 500 block.
1 0
https:// ghd.mysocia
lpinpoint. com/ ameri
can- canyonlrsp/map#/ marker/ 3
02695
Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment.

Speeding/ aggressive driving is addressed as a priority in this report.
38 5/23/2022 15:38
Pedestrian
Comment
All the crosswalks on Wetlands Edge Road are highly used by the neighborhood to reach the Wetlands Linear Path trail or outdoor gym/park Please ADD striping to the crosswalks to make them more visible, and remove bushes ( or keep trimmed short) that impede visibility of smaller pedestrians waiting to cross.
1 0
https:// ghd.mysocia
lpinpoint. com/ ameri
can- canyonlrsp/map#/ marker/ 3
02758
Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment.

Pedestrian safety is addressed as a priority in this
report.

I I I I I I I
404
ID Created on Type Comment
Up
Votes
Down
Votes
View on map Response to Comment
39 5/23/2022 19:29
Driving
Comment
Roads are terrible. People speed after turning onto Kimberly. 0 0 https:// ghd. mysocia
lpinpoint. com/ ameri
can- canyonlrsp/map#/ marker/ 3
02908
Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment.

Speeding/ aggressive driving is addressed as a priority in this report.
40 5/23/2022 19:30
Driving
Comment
Road repairs, please! 0 0
https:// ghd.mysocia
lpinpoint. com/ ameri
can- canyonlrsp/map#/ marker/ 3
02909
Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment. Your
comment will be passed along to the City.
41 5/23/2022 21:02
Driving
Comment
There is continuously speeding 0 0
https:// ghd.mysocia
lpinpoint. com/ ameri
can- canyonlrsp/map#/ marker/ 3
02914
Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment.

Speeding/ aggressive driving is addressed as a priority in this report.
42 5/25/2022 13:16
Driving
Comment
every morning during peak drop-off hours ( 7:45 to 8:10 AM) multiple drivers create their " own" turning lane to turn on Donaldson way towards the middle school. If cars are stopped at the intersection, they split the lane to turn right. Most of the time, the car is stopped because somebody is crossing the street. I have witnessed at least five incidents where somebody almost got hit by a driver who decided to split the lane and cross the crosswalk without looking.
0 0
https:// ghd.mysocia
lpinpoint. com/ ameri
can- canyonlrsp/map#/ marker/ 3
03226
Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment. This
location is addressed in the LRSP.
43 5/27/2022 16:04
Driving
Comment
Traffic speeds in 200 - 400 block wetlands edge road 1 0 https:// ghd.mysocia
lpinpoint. com/ ameri
can- canyonlrsp/map#/ marker/ 3
03660
Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment.

Speeding/ aggressive driving is addressed as a priority in this report.
44 5/28/2022 13:11
Driving
Comment
There are many accidents here going from 55 to a dead stop… is there any way to have a overpass? So there is a straight drive from Mini Drive to Walmart? I understand there is a fault line along 29 but just thought it was worth a shot to ask! Thank you for your time!!
0 0
https:// ghd.mysocia
lpinpoint. com/ ameri
can- canyonlrsp/map#/ marker/ 3
03719
Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment.

There are planned operational improvements for SR 29
that may help mitigate this issue.
45 5/30/2022 7:58
Driving
Comment
Theresa Avenue is "officially" the alternate Route 29. The traffic, especially during commute hours, is horrendous. As a 45 year resident of American Canyon, having always lived on Theresa Avenue, I have witnessed dramatic traffic changes, both on our street and in our city. I noted that traffic calming measures were implemented on Wetlands Edge. I believe that similar measures should be considered for Theresa Avenue. Additionally, the STOP sign at Napa Junction and Theresa is mostly ignored.
0 0
https:// ghd.mysocia
lpinpoint. com/ ameri
can- canyonlrsp/map#/ marker/ 3
03779
Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment.

There are planned operational improvements for SR 29
that may help mitigate this issue.
46 6/8/2022 13:29
Pedestrian
Comment
the fruit vendor on this corner often takes up the entire sidewalk. The fruit stand, the chairs, the pets and the umbrella take up so much space, that pedestrians have to walk in the bike lane to get around them. This creates a problem with cyclists and with the cars. It is a dangerous intersection already, and this makes it worse. 0 0
https:// ghd.mysocia
lpinpoint. com/ ameri
can- canyonlrsp/map#/ marker/ 3
07469
Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment.

Pedestrian safety is addressed as a priority in this
report.
47 6/12/2022 16:12
Biking
Comment
Many Bikers tend to use the sidewalk for biking because they don’t want to bike next to 40+ mph cars. This applies to other roads such as Donaldson. Do either:

A) intentionally narrow lanes to slow car speed
B) have cars yield to bicycles at stop signs because bicycles are most vulnerable after stopping ( they should be continuous)
C) Define the bike lane (green or physical barrier)
D) widen bike lane (Also possibly contributes to A)
0 0
https:// ghd.mysocia
lpinpoint. com/ ameri
can- canyonlrsp/map#/ marker/ 3
08640
Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment.

Bicycle safety is addressed as a priority in the LRSP.
48 6/16/2022 14:24
Biking
Comment
No official bike lane on 29 from American Canyon Road to Donaldson. 0 0 https:// ghd.mysocia
lpinpoint. com/ ameri
can- canyonlrsp/map#/ marker/ 3
10597
Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment.

There are planned multimodal improvements for SR 29.
49 6/16/2022 14:25
Biking
Comment
Pedestrian/ bike lane ends before the train tracks. Need alternative for bikes/ pedestrians going over the over pass.
1 0
https:// ghd.mysocia
lpinpoint. com/ ameri
can- canyonlrsp/map#/ marker/ 3
10606
Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment.

American Canyon City CouncilJune 2, 2026

American Canyon City Council
June 2, 2026