11a. Class 32 Checklist Appendices — Anaheim City Council, August 9, 2022 (part 1 of 6)

APPENDICES

APPENDIX A BIOLOGICAL CONSTRAINTS DESKTOP REVIEW

APPENDIX B TRIP MEMORANDUM

APPENDIX C VMT SCREENING

APPENDIX D NOISE ASSESSMENT

APPENDIX E AIR QUALITY/GREENHOUSE GAS/ENERGY IMPACT STUDY APPENDIX F.1 PRELIMINARY WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN
APPENDIX F.2 PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE STUDY

APPENDIX G CITY OF BUENA PARK WATER AND SEWER WILL SERVE LETTER

APPENDIX H PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
APPENDIX I.1 CULTURAL RESOURCES CONSTRAINTS DESKTOP REVIEW APPENDIX I.2 HISTORIC BUILT ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT

APPENDIX A

BIOLOGICAL CONSTRAINTS DESKTOP REVIEW
Appendix A Biological Constraints Desktop Review
Project #20225206.001A 1 of 11 April 11, 2022 © 2022 Kleinfelder April 11, 2021
Mr. Curtis Zacuto
EcoTierra Consulting, Inc.
5776-D Lindero Canyon Road #414
Westlake Village, California 91362
SUBJECT: Biological Constraints Desktop Review for the Dale Avenue Project (DEV2021- 00188), City of Anaheim, Orange County, California
Dear Mr. Zacuto,
Kleinfelder has prepared the following biological constraints desktop review for the proposed project, which involves both the demolition of an existing 2,500 square-feet single-family home with detached garage/work area, and the development of 18 single-family attached home dwelling units with 6,409 square-feet of open space and 41 parking spaces in Anaheim, Orange County, California.

The desktop review was completed by Kleinfelder biologist Flora Carn on March 30, 2022. The primary objectives of the desktop review were to: identify known special-status plant and wildlife species within and adjacent to the project area; identify sensitive habitat types; assess the suitability of the site to support special-status species; and to summarize potential biological constraints associated with the proposed development of the site.

PROJECT OVERVIEW
The proposed project site is located in a developed neighborhood within the City of Anaheim, in Orange County, California (Figure 1). The proposed project site is approximately 0.03-miles south of the Highway 5 exit from Artesia Freeway (CA-91) and 0.37 miles west of Highway 5 and is located in the Los Coyotes Land Grant of the Anaheim (1981) 7.5-minute U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) quadrangle (Figure 2). The proposed project entails development of 18 single-family attached home dwelling units on approximately 0.929 acre of land located at Assessor’s Parcel Number 070-741-01.

ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
Recent aerial imagery was reviewed to determine land cover types present on the site, including a one-mile buffer surrounding the site (Google 2022). Aerial imagery shows developed and landscaped cover types are present within the proposed project site and project vicinity (Figure 3). Developed habitat is defined as areas with significant human improvements, where native vegetation has been cleared for residential, commercial, industrial, recreational, or transportation purposes. Landscaped habitat typically consists of non-native vegetation planted by humans to increase the aesthetic of an area. Developed and landscaped areas are often dominated by non-native species, resulting in what is considered low-quality habitat for native species.

REVIEW METHODS
Kleinfelder biologist Flora Carn conducted a database search and literature review to determine the potential for sensitive biological resources to occur within the proposed project site and a one-mile buffer surrounding the site. The review focused on special-status plant and wildlife species and sensitive habitat Project #20225206.001A 2 of 11 April 11, 2022 © 2022 Kleinfelder types identified using the following databases: Google Earth (2022), the California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB), the California Native Plant Society (CNPS) Rare Plant Inventory (RPI), National Wetland Inventory (NWI), and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s (USFWS) Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) resource report.

The CNDDB, NWI, and IPaC query included the project footprint and a one-mile buffer (CDFW 2022b; USFWS 2022b, 2022c). The CNPS RPI query consisted of a one-quadrangle search around the project area (CNPS 2022a). A list of special-status plant and wildlife species with potential to occur on the site or within the one-mile buffer can be found in Appendices A and B. Results of the CNDDB search within a one-mile radius are located on Figure 4.

RESULTS
Results of the desktop review indicated ten special-status plant species and four special-status wildlife species with the potential to occur within one mile of the project site. These species are listed below:

Chaparral sand-verbena (Abronia villosa Wats. var. aurita) Horn's milk-vetch (Astragalus hornii var. hornii)
Ventura Marsh Milk-vetch (Astragalus pycnostachyus var. lanosissimus) Parish’s brittlescale (Atriplex Parishii)
Lewis’ evening primrose (Camissoniopsis lewisii)
Southern tarplant (Centromadia parryi ssp. australis)
Southern California black walnut (Juglans californica)
Gambel's water cress (Nasturtium gambelii)
Salt spring checkerbloom (Sidalcea neomexicana)
San Bernadino aster (Symphyotrichum defoliatum)
Western mastiff bat (Eumops perotis)
Quino checkerspot butterfly (Euphydryas editha quino)
Coastal California gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica californica) Monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus)
Project #20225206.001A 3 of 11 April 11, 2022 © 2022 Kleinfelder Detailed information of the special-status plant and wildlife species known to occur or that have a potential to occur within the one-mile search radius can be found in Appendices A and B. The wildlife species require specialized habitat such as chenopod scrub, playas, vernal pools, coastal sage scrub, scrubland, cismontane woodland, meadows and seeps, marshes and swamps, coastal shrublands, coastal dune swales, lower montane coniferous forest, valley and foothill grassland, desert scrub, chapparal, oak woodland, which are not present within the proposed project site based on the aerial image review (CNPS 2022b; USFWS 2022a; USFWS 2004; CDFW 2022a; Texas Parks & Wildlife 2022; Google 2022) The Monarch butterfly has a wider range of suitable habitat but is not expected to be found at the project site. If milkweed or other flowering plants are present, these may be used for foraging but are not likely to be used for overwintering sites (U.S. Forest Service [USFS] 2022). While no suitable habitat for the other six special-status wildlife species is present within the project site and buffer area, suitable nesting habitat for raptors and migratory bird species protected by California Fish and Game Code 3503.5 and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) is present within the proposed project site and buffer.

The proposed project site is surrounded by residential development and a highway, which suggests human activity in the area is high. This indicates a low likelihood that wildlife species sensitive to human disturbance will be present in or use the study area. The project site and surrounding area is anticipated to support wildlife species that thrive in urban and disturbed habitats, including but not limited to, California ground squirrel (Otospermophilus beecheyi), raccoon (Procyon lotor), American crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos), European starling (Sturnus vulgaris), northern mockingbird (Mimus polyglottos), lesser goldfinch (Carduelis psaltria), rock pigeon (Columba livia), house finch (Passer domesticus), and western fence lizard (Sceloporus occidentalis).

Results of the CNPS RPI and IPaC queries indicated ten special-status plant species known to occur within the one-quad search area (Appendix B). However, there is no suitable habitat for any of these species within the project site, and the developed and landscaped nature of the project site likely precludes all of these species from occurring on the site. More information regarding this assessment can be found in Appendix B.

Results of the NWI query indicated two water features present within the one-mile search radius (USFWS 2022c). Fullerton Creek is located approximately 0.31 miles northeast of the proposed project area.

Fullerton Creek is an intermittent riverine system with an artificial streambed, within which surface water is present for extended periods early in the growing season, but absent by the end of the growing season in most years. This creek connects with the Houston Corporate Storm Channel, a man-made channel. These water features are not likely to be impacted by the project.

There is indication of a drainage channel that runs just north of the project site, though it is not mapped on the NWI or the USGS Topographic map (USFWS 2022c; Figure 2). The drainage is likely associated with the Highway 5/CA-91 interchange and no surface connection to Fullerton Creek or the Houston Storm Channel could be identified. Compliance with the California Water Boards Construction Stormwater Program would result in less than significant impacts to any potentially connected water bodies downstream of the project site.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Due to the developed and landscaped nature of the project site and surrounding area, no suitable habitat that would support special-status plant or wildlife species, or sensitive habitats protected by CDFW, is present.

However, suitable nesting habitat for raptors and native migratory birds is present within and adjacent to the project site.

Project #20225206.001A 4 of 11 April 11, 2022 © 2022 Kleinfelder As stated above, the vegetation surrounding the proposed project site provide suitable nesting habitat for birds protected by the MBTA and California Fish and Game Code. Therefore, Kleinfelder recommends a nesting bird survey prior to any vegetation removal or ground disturbance activities occur during bird breeding season, which lasts from February 1 to September 15.

APPENDICES
Appendix A: Special-Status Wildlife Species with Potential to Occur in the Vicinity of the Proposed Dale Avenue Project Area
Appendix B: Special-Status Plant Species with Potential to Occur in the Vicinity of the Proposed Dale Avenue Project Area

FIGURES
Figure 1: Regional Vicinity
Figure 2: Project Location
Figure 3: Project Area
Figure 4: CNDDB Occurrences

REFERENCES CITED
California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). 2022a. Ventura Marsh Milkvetch. California Department of Fish and Wildlife. Accessed March 30, 2022, from https://wildlife.ca.gov/Conservation/Plants/Endangered/Astragalus-pycnostachyus-varlanosissimus CDFW. 2022b. California Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB) results for the following 7.5-minute U.S.

Geological Survey quadrangles: Anaheim. Accessed March 4, 2022.

California Native Plants Society (CNPS). 2022a. Rare Plant Inventory. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants of California. Accessed March 16, 2022, from http://www.rareplants.cnps.org/ CNPS. 2022b. Rare Plant Program. Rare Plant Inventory (online edition, v9-01 1.5). Website https://www.rareplants.cnps.org. Accessed March 16, 2022.

Google Earth Pro. 2022. “1442 N Dale Ave, Anaheim, CA 92801 and surrounding area.” 33°51'20.44"N 117°59'01.93"W. GoogleEarthPro. Accessed March 16, 2022.

Texas Parks & Wildlife. 2022. Western Mastiff Bat (Eumops perotis). Accessed March 17, 2022 from https://tpwd.texas.gov/huntwild/wild/species/westmastiff/ U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2022a. Coastal California Gnatcatcher. USFWS San Diego National Wildlife Refuge, California Accessed March 16, 2022, from https://www.fws.gov/refuge/san_diego/wildlife_and_habitat/threatened_and_endangered_species/ Coastal_California_Gnatcatcher.html
Project #20225206.001A 5 of 11 April 11, 2022 © 2022 Kleinfelder USFWS. 2004. Department of the Interior. “Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Final Designation of Critical Habitat for Astragalus pycnostachyus var. lanosissimus (Ventura Marsh milk-vetch). 50 Fed. Reg. Part 17 29,081 (May 20, 2004).

USFWS. 2022b. Information Planning and Conservation. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service IPaC. Accessed March 16, 2022, from https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/
USFWS. 2022c. National Wetlands Inventory website. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C. http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/. Last accessed March 16, 2022.

USFWS. 2022d. Quino Checkerspot Butterfly (Euphydryas editha quino) Facts About Quino Checkerspot Butterfly. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. Accessed March 30, 2022, from https://www.fws.gov/story/quino-checkerspot-butterfly
U.S. Forest Service. 2022. Monarch Butterfly Habitat Needs. US Department of Agriculture. Accessed March 16, 2022, from https://www.fs.fed.us/wildflowers/pollinators/Monarch_Butterfly/habitat/ Project #20225206.001A 6 of 11 April 11, 2022 © 2022 Kleinfelder Appendix A: Special-Status Wildlife Species with Potential to Occur in the Vicinity of the Proposed Dale Avenue Project Area
Project #20225206.001A 7 of 11 April 11, 2022 © 2022 Kleinfelder Birds Federal/State
Status Habitat Potential to Occur
Coastal California
Gnatcatcher FT/SSC Coastal sage scrub
Not expected to occur: Suitable
habitat is not present for this
species on or adjacent to the
site.

Bats Federal/State
Status Habitat Potential to Occur
Western Mastiff Bat
(Polioptila californica
californica)
FT/SSC
Significant rock features form
habitat. Found in desert scrub,
chaparral, oak woodland
Not expected to occur: Suitable
habitat is not present for this
species on or adjacent to the
site.

Invertebrates Federal/State
Status Habitat Potential to Occur
Quino checkerspot
butterfly (Euphydryas
editha quino)
FE/S1
Patchy shrub or small tree
landscapes with openings of
several meters between large
plants, or a landscape of open
swales alternating with dense
patches of shrubs; “scrublands”
Not expected to occur: Suitable
habitat is not present for this
species on or adjacent to the
site.

Monarch butterfly
(Danaus plexippus)
Candidate for
listing
Grasslands, wetlands, deciduous
forest, and shrub-steppe supporting
large, contiguous, and high-density
milkweed stands
Not expected to occur: Suitable
habitat is not present for this
species on or adjacent to the
site.
1 Legend
FE: Federally Endangered
FT: Federally Threatened
SSC: Species of Concern (CDFW)
S1: State Ranked
Project #20225206.001A 8 of 11 April 11, 2022 © 2022 Kleinfelder Appendix B: Special-Status Plant Species with Potential to Occur in the Vicinity of the Proposed Dale Avenue Project Area
Project #20225206.001A 9 of 11 April 11, 2022 © 2022 Kleinfelder Special-Status Plant Species with Potential to Occur in the Vicinity of the Proposed Pepperwood Place Project Area
Plants Federal/State
List CRPR Habitat Potential to Occur
Lewis’ evening
primrose
(Camissoniopsis
lewisii)
None/None 3
Coastal bluff scrub,
cismontane
woodland, coastal
dunes, coastal scrub,
valley and foothill
grassland
Not expected to
occur: Suitable
habitat is not present
for this species on or
adjacent to the site.

Horn's milk-vetch
(Astragalus hornii
var. hornii)
None/None 1B.1
Meadows & seeps,
playas. Micro
Habitat: Lake
margins, alkaline
Not expected to
occur: Suitable
habitat is not present
for this species on or
adjacent to the site.

Chaparral sandverbena (Abronia
villosa Wats. var.
aurita)
None/None 1B.1
Chaparral; coastal
scrub; desert dunes.

Micro Habitat: sandy
Not expected to
occur: Suitable
habitat is not present
for this species on or
adjacent to the site.

Southern California
black walnut (Juglans
californica)
None/None 4.2
Chaparral,
cismontane
woodland, coastal
scrub, riparian
woodland. General
Micro Habitat:
alluvial
Not expected to
occur: Suitable
habitat is not present
for this species on or
adjacent to the site.

Parish's brittlescale
(Atriplex parishii) None/None 1B.1
Chenopod scrub;
playas; vernal pools.

General Micro
Habitat: alkaline
Not expected to
occur: Suitable
habitat is not present
for this species on or
adjacent to the site.

Southern tarplant
(Centromadia parryi
ssp. australis)
None/None 1B.1
Marshes & swamps
(margins); valley &
foothill grasslands
(vernally mesic);
vernal pools
Not expected to
occur: Suitable
habitat is not present
for this species on or
adjacent to the site.

Gambel's water cress
(Nasturtium gambelii) FE/CT 1B.1
Marshes and swamps
(brackish,
freshwater)
Not expected to
occur: Suitable
habitat is not present
for this species on or
adjacent to the site.

Salt spring
checkerbloom
(Sidalcea
neomexicana)
None/None 2B.2
Chaparral; coastal
scrub; lower montane
coniferous forest;
Mojavean desert
scrub; playas.

General Micro
Habitat: alkaline,
mesic
Not expected to
occur: Suitable
habitat is not present
for this species on or
adjacent to the site.

Project #20225206.001A 10 of 11 April 11, 2022 © 2022 Kleinfelder San Bernardino aster
(Symphyotrichum
defoliatum)
None/None 1B.2
Cismontane
woodland; coastal
scrub; lower montane
coniferous forest;
meadows & seeps;
valley & foothill
grassland (vernally
mesic). General
Micro Habitat: near
ditches, streams,
springs
Not expected to
occur: Suitable
habitat is not present
for this species on or
adjacent to the site.

Ventura Marsh Milkvetch
(Astragalus
pycnostachyus var.
lanosissimus)
FE/CE 1B.1
Coastal dunes;
coastal scrub;
marshes and swamps
(brackish)
Not expected to
occur: Suitable
habitat is not present
for this species on or
adjacent to the site.
1 Legend
FE: Federally Endangered
CT: California Threatened
CPRR: California Rare Plant Ranks
1B.1: Plants rare, threatened, or endangered in California and elsewhere; seriously threatened in California
1B.2: Plants rare, threatened, or endangered in California and elsewhere; fairly threatened in California
2B.2: Plants rare, threatened, or endangered in California, but common elsewhere; fairly threatened in California
3: Plants about which more information is needed

4.2: Plants uncommon in California, of limited distribution, a watch list; moderately threatened in California
Project #20225206.001A 11 of 11 April 11, 2022 © 2022 Kleinfelder Figures
^_
Æÿ39
Project Location
ORANGE
COUNTY
Æÿ22
Æÿ91 Æÿ1
Æÿ47
Æÿ39
Æÿ1
Æÿ107
Æÿ42
Æÿ
Æÿ90 72
Æÿ71
§¨¦710
§¨¦5
§¨¦405

LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
Project
Location
^_
±
0 1.53
Kilometers
Regional Vicinity
Anaheim 1442 Dale Avenue
012 Orange County, California
Miles
Created By: C BARKERSWITZER Document Path: \\azrgisstorp01\GIS_Projects\Client\GANDA\CityofLA\20225206_Anaheim_1442_Dale_Ave\BIO_Anaheim_1442_Dale_Ave_Vicinity.mxd Scale 1:126,720
Source: Bing Maps
1 in = 2 miles
Service Layer Credits: Copyright:© 2013 National
Geographic Society, i-cubed
Project
Location ^_
±
0 300 600
Meters
Project Location
Anaheim 1442 Dale Avenue
Orange County, California
USGS 7.5' Quad: ANAHEIM (1981)
Legal Description: LOS COYOTES Land Grant
Project Area
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
1 Inch = 2,000 Feet
Scale 1:24,000
Created By: C BARKERSWITZER Document Path: \\azrgisstorp01\GIS_Projects\Client\GANDA\CityofLA\20225206_Anaheim_1442_Dale_Ave\BIO_Anaheim_1442_Dale_Ave_Location.mxd Project
Location
^_
±
0 300 600
Meters
Project Area
Dale Avenue Condominium Project
Orange County, California
USGS 7.5' Quad: ANAHEIM (1981)
Legal Description: LOS COYOTES Land Grant 0 1,000 2,000 Feet
1 Inch = 2,000 Feet
Scale 1:24,000
Created By: C BARKERSWITZER Document Path: \\azrgisstorp01\GIS_Projects\Client\GANDA\CityofLA\20225206_Anaheim_1442_Dale_Ave\CULT_Anaheim_1442_Dale_Ave_Proj_Area_1mile.mxd Project Area
One-mile Buffer
!
Quino
checkerspot
butterfly
San Bernadino aster
Parish's brittlescale
Western mastiff bat
National Geographic, Esri, Garmin, HERE, UNEP-WCMC, USGS, NASA, ESA, METI, NRCAN, GEBCO, NOAA, increment P Corp.

Project
Location ^_
±
0 0.5 1
Kilometers
CNDDB Occurrences
Anaheim 1442 Dale Avenue
Orange County, California
! Project Location
Project Location One-mile Buffer
Parish's brittlescale
San Bernardino aster
Western mastiff bat
Quino checkerspot butterfly
0 0.25 0.5
Mile Scale 1:31,680
Created By: JHiatt Document Path: \\azrgisstorp01\GIS_Projects\Client\GANDA\CityofLA\20225206_Anaheim_1442_Dale_Ave\Anaheim_1442_Dale_AVE_CNDDB.mxd Source: CDFW CNDDB (2022)
1 inch = 0.5 miles

APPENDIX B

TRIP MEMORANDUM
K2 Traffic Engineering, Inc.
1442 Irvine Blvd, Suite 210, Tustin, CA 92780 T.714-832-2116 Email: [email protected] March 10, 2022
Chris Segesman
Bonanni Development
5500 Bolsa Ave, Suite 120
Huntington Beach, CA 92649
Re: Trip Generation Memo
Proposed 18-Unit Townhomes
1442 N. Dale Ave, Anaheim
Dear Chris,
Per your request, we have completed a trip generation memorandum for the proposed multi-family development. This letter presents our findings and recommendations.

PROJECT DEVELOPMENT
The project site is located at 1442 North Dale Avenue in the City of Anaheim. The proposed development consists of demolishing an existing single-family unit of 1,680 square feet and constructing an 18-unit townhome development including 16 standard units and two (2) affordable units. Proposed site plan is shown in Exhibit 1.

TRIP GENERATION
Passenger vehicle trips were estimated using the rates and methodologies outlined in “Trip Generation, 11th Edition”, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). The applicable trip generation rates are shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Trip Generation Rate (ITE)

Land Use

Unit

Daily
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Total In Out Total In Out
Affordable Housing –
Income Limits (223)
Dwelling
Unit 4.81 0.36 29% 71% 0.46 59% 41%
Multifamily Housing
(Low-Rise) (220)
Dwelling
Unit 6.74 0.40 24% 76% 0.51 63% 37%
Single-Family Detached
Housing (210)
Dwelling
Unit 9.43 0.70 26% 74% 0.94 63% 37%
Trip Generation Memo
Proposed 18-Unit Townhomes March 10, 2022
1442 N. Dale Ave, Anaheim Page 2 of 2
K2 Traffic Engineering, Inc.
1442 Irvine Blvd, Suite 210, Tustin, CA 92780 T.714-832-2116 Email: [email protected] The project is expected to generate a NET increase of 6 trips in the AM peak hour, 8 trips in the PM peak hour and 109 daily trips. The projected trips associated with the project are provided in Table 2.

Table 2. Project Trip Generation
Land Use Unit Quantity
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Total In Out Total In Out Daily
Proposed:

Affordable Housing –
Income Limits (223)
Dwelling
Unit 2 1 0 1 1 1 0 10
Proposed:

Multifamily Housing
(Low-Rise) (220)
Dwelling
Unit 16 6 1 5 8 5 3 108
Existing Credit:

Single-Family Detached
Housing (210)
Dwelling
Unit -1 -1 0 -1 -1 -1 0 -9
NET Trip Generation 6 1 5 8 5 3 109
According to the “City of Anaheim Criteria for Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies,” proposed developments with an AM or PM peak hour trip generation that exceeds 100 vehicle trips are required to conduct a Level of Service (LOS) analysis.

With a projected trip generation of only 6 trips in the AM peak hour and 8 trips in the PM peak hour, the project should have no or less than significant impact to nearby roadways and intersections. Therefore, a full LOS analysis and further assessment of traffic impact is not required.

Regards,
K2 Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Jende Kay Hsu, T.E.

California License TR2285

!
%--%0--;%
.69469-15.694);165.3"+
)3&1&" $1&2

%
.3"+ -)32
6&++)-' -)32

-,9664'51;: '51;:
'51;
'51;:'51;
'51;:
-,9664'51;:

'51;:

'51;

'51;:

'51;:)9-)++-::1*3-
%--%0--;%
.69..69,)*3-'51;)3+<3);165:
&-2)38
++.6&%7-9$ (6515/

%
,<
++.6&%6)3( .-42

*65<:.69

)..69,)*3-
'
'96<5,<77-9

1.5)%&%

"1*)-'

&04)1&%

/"$&2

-,
%7)+-
'51;-,
%7)+-
'51;
<-:;!65-$-8<19-,

@$1/0;$-,<+;165

1.5)%&%

/"$&2

)9)/- %7)+-:"7-56..:;9--; %7)+-:
$-8<19-,++-::1*3-
%7)+-'5)::1/5-,"7-5?
/&-
/"$& /

/&-
/"$&
&04)1&%

/&-
/"$&

1.5)%&%

)3&.5&1"'&
%%#

-
"7),4,++.6&%

1.5)%&%
)3&.5&1"'&

% &6;)36=-9)/-

% %1;-

&04)1&%
&3#"$*2 0

%;9<+;<9)3%-;*)+2#91=);-%;9--;
.--;%;9<+;<9)3%-;*)+2
5;-9169

.--;%;9<+;<9)3%-;*)+29-->)@

.--;
%-;*)+2$-,<+;1657-9

&)*3-

&'&-%
,)7;)*3-'51; #-9

'51;:&6;)3
..69,)*3-'51;6+);165:
'51;:&6;)3
1

$"$%

$%!#)"#'%#'$%

$%!#) %#!#$%
(%
!#
#&%!

#()$%

"#!
%! !'

#! %

"#!
%! !'

#! %

$%!#) %#!#$%
(%
!#
#&%!

&%
%)$ %

"#'%#' '&
# "$%# #$$ #$$$ %
'&
# "$%#
#$$ #$$$ %
'&
# "$%#
#$$ #$$$ %

)
%# $!##
%# $!##

#!$%"#
$%

'(%#

"#$%

$"$%

#!

"

EXHIBIT 1. PROPOSED SITE PLAN

APPENDIX C

VMT SCREENING
Appendix C VMT Screening
K2 Traffic Engineering, Inc.
1442 Irvine Blvd, Suite 210, Tustin, CA 92780 T.714-832-2116 Email: [email protected] March 10, 2022
Chris Segesman
Bonanni Development
5500 Bolsa Ave, Suite 120
Huntington Beach, CA 92649
Re: VMT Screening Assessment
Proposed 18-Unit Townhomes
1442 N. Dale Ave, Anaheim
Dear Chris,
Per your request, we have conducted a VMT screening assessment for the proposed multi-family development. This letter presents our findings and recommendations.

VMT SCREENING ASSESSMENT
For the purpose of Senate Bill (SB) 743 and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) compliance, a Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) analysis should be conducted for land use projects that have the potential to increase the average VMT per service population compared to the County of Orange boundary. The “City of Anaheim Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for California Environmental Quality Act Analysis,” has identified three types of project screening that may be applied to effectively screen projects from conducting a full project-level assessment.

VMT Screening Assessment
Proposed 18-Unit Townhomes March 10, 2022
1442 N. Dale Ave, Anaheim Page 2 of 5
K2 Traffic Engineering, Inc.
1442 Irvine Blvd, Suite 210, Tustin, CA 92780 T.714-832-2116 Email: [email protected] Type 1: Transit Priority Area (TPA) Screening
According to the City’s Guidelines, projects located within a Transit Priority Area (TPA)1 may be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary.

City’s Guidelines stated that this presumption may NOT be appropriate if the project:

1. Has a total Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of less than 0.75;  The Project has a FAR of 0.62, less than 0.75.

2. Includes more parking for use by residents, customers, or employees of the project than required by the jurisdiction (if the jurisdiction requires the project to supply parking);
 City’s Parking Code requires 2.25 spaces per unit for two-bedroom units and 3 spaces per unit for three-bedroom units. The project consists of 7 twobedroom units and 11 three-bedroom units; therefore, a total of 49 parking spaces are required. The project provides 41 parking spaces. The project does NOT include more parking for use by residents, customers, or employees of the project than required by the jurisdiction

3. Is inconsistent with the applicable Sustainable Communities Strategy (as determined by the lead agency, with input from the Metropolitan Planning Organization); or

1 A TPA is defined as a ½ mile area around an existing major transit stop or an existing stop along a high quality transit corridor per the following definitions:

Pub. Resources Code, § 21064.3 - ‘Major transit stop’ means a site containing an existing rail transit station, a ferry terminal served by either a bus or rail transit service, or the intersection of two or more major bus routes with a frequency of service interval of 15 minutes or less during the morning and afternoon peak commute periods.

Pub. Resources Code, § 21155 - For purposes of this section, a ‘high-quality transit corridor’ means a corridor with fixed route bus service with service intervals no longer than 15 minutes during peak commute hours.

VMT Screening Assessment
Proposed 18-Unit Townhomes March 10, 2022
1442 N. Dale Ave, Anaheim Page 3 of 5
K2 Traffic Engineering, Inc.
1442 Irvine Blvd, Suite 210, Tustin, CA 92780 T.714-832-2116 Email: [email protected]  The project is NOT inconsistent with the applicable Sustainable Communities Strategy

4. Replaces affordable residential units with a smaller number of moderate‐ or high‐income residential units.
 The project provides two affordable residential units, and does NOT replace affordable residential units with a smaller number of moderate‐ or high‐income residential units.

The analysis refers to Attachment A of Anaheim’s TIA Guidelines for CEQA, as shown in Exhibit 2, indicating that the project is NOT located within a TPA and has a FAR of less than 0.75. The TPA screening is NOT MET.

Type 2: Low VMT Area Screening
Residential and office projects located within a low VMT-generating area may be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary. Other employment-related and mixed-use projects within a low VMTgenerating area may also qualify for this screening if the project can reasonably be expected to generate VMT per service population similar to the existing land uses in the low VMT area.

Based on Attachment B of the City’s TIA Guidelines for CEQA, shown in Exhibit 3, the project is NOT located within a low VMT area. The low VMT area screening is NOT MET.

Type 3: Project Type Screening
Local serving projects generally reduce vehicle travel by providing a more proximate location to travel to. In accordance with the City’s Guidelines, local serving projects generating less than 110 daily vehicle trips may be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary.

VMT Screening Assessment
Proposed 18-Unit Townhomes March 10, 2022
1442 N. Dale Ave, Anaheim Page 4 of 5
1442 Irvine Blvd, Suite 210, Tustin, CA 92780 T.714-832-2116 Email: [email protected] The proposed development is expected to generate 6 trips in the AM peak hour, 8 trips in the PM peak hour, and 109 daily trips. The applicable ITE trip generation rates and the projected trips associated with the proposed development are provided in Table 1.

Table 1. Trip Generation
Land Use Unit Quantity
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Total In Out Total In Out Daily
ITE Trip Generation Rate
Affordable Housing –
Income Limits (223)
Dwelling
Unit - 0.36 29% 71% 0.46 59% 41% 4.81
Multifamily Housing
(Low-Rise) (220)
Dwelling
Unit - 0.40 24% 76% 0.51 63% 37% 6.74
Single-Family Detached
Housing (210)
Dwelling
Unit - 0.70 26% 74% 0.94 63% 37% 9.43
Proposed Trip Generation
Proposed:

Affordable Housing –
Income Limits (223)
Dwelling
Unit 2 1 0 1 1 1 0 10
Proposed:

Multifamily Housing
(Low-Rise) (220)
Dwelling
Unit 16 6 1 5 8 5 3 108
Existing Credit:

Single-Family Detached
Housing (210)
Dwelling
Unit -1 -1 0 -1 -1 -1 0 -9
NET Trip Generation 6 1 5 8 5 3 109
The project is expected to generate 109 daily trips, below the threshold of 110 daily trips.

The Project Type screening is MET.

SUMMARY
The proposed 18-unit multi-family development is screened out from conducting a project-level VMT assessment by meeting the Project Type Screening. The project can be presumed to have a less than significant VMT impact.

K2 Traffic Engineering, Inc.

VMT Screening Assessment
Proposed 18-Unit Townhomes March 10, 2022
1442 N. Dale Ave, Anaheim Page 5 of 5
K2 Traffic Engineering, Inc.
1442 Irvine Blvd, Suite 210, Tustin, CA 92780 T.714-832-2116 Email: [email protected] Should you have any question in this regard, please feel free to contact me directly (714) 832 – 2116 or [email protected].

Regards,
K2 Traffic Engineering, Inc.

Jende Kay Hsu, T.E.

California License TR2285

!
%--%0--;%
.69469-15.694);165.3"+
)3&1&" $1&2

%
.3"+ -)32
6&++)-' -)32

-,9664'51;: '51;:
'51;
'51;:'51;
'51;:
-,9664'51;:

'51;:

'51;

'51;:

'51;:)9-)++-::1*3-
%--%0--;%
.69..69,)*3-'51;)3+<3);165:
&-2)38
++.6&%7-9$ (6515/

%
,<
++.6&%6)3( .-42

*65<:.69

)..69,)*3-
'
'96<5,<77-9

1.5)%&%

"1*)-'

&04)1&%

/"$&2

-,
%7)+-
'51;-,
%7)+-
'51;
<-:;!65-$-8<19-,

@$1/0;$-,<+;165

1.5)%&%

/"$&2

)9)/- %7)+-:"7-56..:;9--; %7)+-:
$-8<19-,++-::1*3-
%7)+-'5)::1/5-,"7-5?
/&-
/"$& /

/&-
/"$&
&04)1&%

/&-
/"$&

1.5)%&%

)3&.5&1"'&
%%#

-
"7),4,++.6&%

1.5)%&%
)3&.5&1"'&

% &6;)36=-9)/-

% %1;-

&04)1&%
&3#"$*2 0

%;9<+;<9)3%-;*)+2#91=);-%;9--;
.--;%;9<+;<9)3%-;*)+2
5;-9169

.--;%;9<+;<9)3%-;*)+29-->)@

.--;
%-;*)+2$-,<+;1657-9

&)*3-

&'&-%
,)7;)*3-'51; #-9

'51;:&6;)3
..69,)*3-'51;6+);165:
'51;:&6;)3
1

$"$%

$%!#)"#'%#'$%

$%!#) %#!#$%
(%
!#
#&%!

#()$%

"#!
%! !'

#! %

"#!
%! !'

#! %

$%!#) %#!#$%
(%
!#
#&%!

&%
%)$ %

"#'%#' '&
# "$%# #$$ #$$$ %
'&
# "$%#
#$$ #$$$ %
'&
# "$%#
#$$ #$$$ %

)
%# $!##
%# $!##

#!$%"#
$%

'(%#

"#$%

$"$%

#!

"

EXHIBIT 1. PROPOSED SITE PLAN
Irvine
Ranch OS
Chino
Hills SP
Rose Dr
eB a hc Bl
Garden Grove Bl
Bl e lleg oC e t at S
Yorba Linda Bl
Tustin Av
Valley View St
Drive The City
l B hcaeB
Orangethorpe Av
t S dil c u E
Vi ll a Pa rk Rd
Santa Ana Canyon Rd
Imper ai l Hwy
Harbor Bl
Newport Av
Chapman Av
Harbor Bl
La Pa ml a Av
Katella Av
Orangethorpe Av
t S ts ookhur Br
Esperanza Rd
Cannon St
Imperial Hw
Jamboree Rd
142
·
261
·
241
·
91 ∙
55 ∙
57 ∙
22 ∙
90 ∙
39 ∙
405
%&
5"!
Transit Priority Areas (TPAs) in Anaheim
Attachment A
Anaheim
Metrolink Stations
HQT Bus Stops Buffer(0.5 mile)
Anaheim Bl
Source: OCTA, March, 2020, http://www.octa.net/Bus/Routes-and-Schedules/Overview/ EXHIBIT 2. CITY OF ANAHEIM TPA MAP
142 ·
261 ·
241 ·
91·
55·
57·
22·
90·
39·
405 %&
5"!
6RXUFH
2&7$09HUVLRQ%DVH<HDU

0DUFK
$WWDFKPHQW%
Daily VMT per Service Population in Anaheim TAZs as Compared to the Orange County Average (2016) Anaheim City No Service Population
< -15% below the Orange County Average
0 to -15% below the Orange County AverageHigher than the Orange County Average EXHIBIT 3. CITY OF ANAHEIM LOW VMT MAP

APPENDIX D

NOISE ASSESSMENT
Appendix D Noise Assessment
AZ Office CA Office
4960 S. Gilbert Road, Ste 1-461 1197 Los Angeles Avenue, Ste C-256 Chandler, AZ 85249 Simi Valley, CA 93065
p. (602) 774-1950 p. (805) 426-4477
www.mdacoustics.com
MD Acoustics, LLC 1
JN: 03322203_Letter Report
April 5, 2022
Curtis Zacuto
EcoTierra Consulting
633 W. 5th Street, 26th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Subject: Dale Avenue Project – Cat32 Exemption Noise Impact Assessment – Anaheim City, CA
Dear Mr. Zacuto:

MD Acoustics, LLC (MD) has completed a noise impact assessment for the proposed Dale Avenue project located at 1442 North Dale Avenue in Anaheim, CA. The project has filed for a Categorical 32 Exemption (Cat32) in which an “Infill” Categorical Exemption (CEQA Guideline Section 15332), exempts infill development within urbanized areas if it meets certain criteria. The class consists of environmentally benign infill projects that are consistent with the local General Plan and Zoning requirements. This class is not intended for projects that would result in any significant traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality impacts.

It may apply to residential, commercial, industrial, and/or mixed-use projects.

The intent of this noise assessment is to demonstrate the project’s compliance with applicable noise regulations and lack of significant noise impacts. A glossary of Acoustical Terms is located in Appendix A.

1.0 Project Description and Assessment Overview
The Project proposes the construction of 18 two-story single-family attached homes in a residential subdivision on an approximately 0.93-acre site. Each unit will have a two-car garage with five additional open parking spaces on-site and a total of 6,409 square feet of open space.

Per the General Plan Land Use Map, the project site is designated low-density residential with a “T” Transition zone. The project site is surrounded by multi-family residential townhomes to the east, west, and south and the townhome development’s visitor parking and community recreational facility (pool/spa and landscaped open space) to the south. The project site is bordered by the landscaped slope of the Artesia Freeway (SR-91) to the north. The Fullerton Municipal Airport is approximately 1 mile to the north and falls outside of the airport’s published noise contours per the City of Fullerton’s General Plan.

This assessment calculates the short-term noise levels during the various phases of construction, provides the necessary noise control measures to remain in compliance with the City’s noise ordinance and General Plan Noise Element, and provides the long-term noise levels after the project is constructed and residents occupy said complex. The project location map is in Exhibit A. The site plan utilized for the project is indicated in Exhibit B.

2.0 Local Acoustical Requirements
Anaheim City outlines their noise regulations and standards within the Municipal Code and excerpts of the code as it relates to this project are provided below:

Dale Avenue Project
Cat32 Exemption Noise Impact Assessment
Anaheim City, CA
MD Acoustics, LLC 2
JN: 03322203_Letter Report
Section 6.70.010 from the Municipal Code discusses the noise standards for stationary noise sources and states that no person shall within the City create any sound radiated for extended periods from any premises which produces a sound pressure level at any point on the property line in excess of sixty decibels (Re 0.0002 Microbar) read on the A-scale of a sound level meter using the slowest meter’s response.

Section 6.70.010 of the municipal code also regulates the allowable hours of construction activity. Sound created by construction or building repair of any premises within the City shall be exempt from the applications of this chapter during the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Additional work hours may be permitted if deemed necessary by the Director of Public Works or Building Official.

3.0 Study Method and Procedure

3.1 FHWA Traffic Noise Model
The traffic noise analysis utilizes the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Traffic Noise Model, together with several key construction parameters. Key input speed, site conditions, average daily traffic (ADT), and vehicle mix data. Table 1 outlines the roadway assumptions. Traffic noise input and output calculations are provided in Appendix B.

Table 1: Roadway Parameters and Vehicle Distribution
Roadway Segment Existing ADT1 Existing Plus
Project ADT Speed (MPH) Site Conditions
I-5 Fullerton, Jct. Rte. 91 136,500 136,612 65 Hard
SR-91 Fullerton, Jct. Rte. 5 159,500 159,612 65 Hard
Highway Vehicle Distribution (Truck Mix)2
Motor-Vehicle Type Daytime %
(7 AM to 7 PM)
Evening %
(7 PM to 10 PM)
Night %
(10 PM to 7 AM)
Total % of
Traffic Flow
Automobiles 75.5 14.0 10.5 92.00
Medium Trucks 48.9 2.2 48.9 4.33
Heavy Trucks 47.3 5.5 47.3 3.67
Notes:
1 CalEEMod prediction.
2 Typical southern California vehicle distribution and Caltrans truck counts.

The modeling does not take into account any existing barriers, structures, and/or topographical features that may further reduce noise levels.

3.2 FHWA Construction Noise Model
The construction noise analysis utilizes the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Noise and Vibration During Construction model/methodology, together with several key construction parameters. Key inputs include distance to the sensitive receiver, equipment usage, % usage factor, and baseline parameters for the project site. The project was analyzed based on the different construction phases. The FTA has compiled data regarding the noise generated characteristics of typical construction activities and is presented in Table 2.

Dale Avenue Project
Cat32 Exemption Noise Impact Assessment
Anaheim City, CA
MD Acoustics, LLC 3
JN: 03322203_Letter Report
Table 2: Typical Construction Equipment Noise Levels1
Type Typical Noise Level at 50 Feet (Lmax, dBA)
Saw 90
Dozer 85
Grader 85
Loader 80
Backhoe 80
Crane 85
Air Compressor 80
Notes:
1 Referenced Noise Levels from FHWA Construction Noise Handbook.

Construction noise is expected to be loudest during the demo and paving phases of construction. The construction noise calculation output worksheet is located in Appendix C. Construction assumptions follow the air quality report’s assumptions and utilize the same equipment as outlined within said report.

4.0 Traffic Noise Level Projections
Traffic noise along I-5 and SR-91 will be the main source of noise impacting the project site and the surrounding area and would have the potential largest change in noise level as a result of the proposed project once construction is completed.

A worst-case project-generated traffic noise level was modeled utilizing the FHWA Traffic Noise Prediction Model - FHWA-RD-77-108. Traffic noise levels were calculated at the northern property line of the project site. The modeling does not take into account any existing barriers, structures, and/or topographical features that may further reduce noise levels. The model also doesn’t take into account the effects of roads splitting at the junction. Therefore, the levels are shown for comparative purposes only to show the difference with and without project conditions. The overall change in noise level is reliant only on the ADT percentage change.

In addition, the noise contours for 60, 65, and 70 dBA CNEL were calculated. The potential off-site noise impacts caused by an increase in traffic from the operation of the proposed project on the nearby roadways were calculated for the following scenarios. Calculations are in Appendix B Existing Year (without Project): This scenario refers to existing year traffic noise conditions.

Existing Year (Plus Project): This scenario refers to existing year + project traffic noise conditions.

Table 3 compares the without and with project scenario and shows the change in traffic noise levels as a result of the proposed project. It takes a change of 3 dB or more to hear an audible difference. I-5 and SR91 are anticipated to experience a net worst-case increase of 112 trips per day due to the project. As demonstrated in Table 3 the project is not anticipated to change the existing noise level and therefore there is no impact.

Dale Avenue Project
Cat32 Exemption Noise Impact Assessment
Anaheim City, CA
MD Acoustics, LLC 4
JN: 03322203_Letter Report
Table 3: Existing Scenario – Noise Levels Along Roadways (dBA CNEL) Existing Without Project Exterior Noise Levels
Roadway Segment
CNEL
at Site
(dBA)
Distance to Contour (Ft)
70 dBA
CNEL
65 dBA
CNEL
60 dBA
CNEL
55 dBA
CNEL
I-5 Fullerton, Jct. Rte. 91 66.8 520 1120 2412 5197
SR-91 Fullerton, Jct. Rte. 5 72.9 585 1261 2716 5851
Existing With Project Exterior Noise Levels
Roadway Segment
CNEL
at Site
(dBA)
Distance to Contour (Ft)
70 dBA
CNEL
65 dBA
CNEL
60 dBA
CNEL
55 dBA
CNEL
I-5 Fullerton, Jct. Rte. 91 66.8 520 1120 2414 5200
SR-91 Fullerton, Jct. Rte. 5 72.9 585 1261 2717 5854
Change in Existing Noise Levels as a Result of Project
Roadway1 Segment
CNEL at Site dBA2
Existing
Without
Project
Existing
With
Project
Change in
Noise Level
Potential
Significant
Impact
I-5 Fullerton, Jct. Rte. 91 66.8 66.8 0.0 No
SR-91 Fullerton, Jct. Rte. 5 72.9 72.9 0.0 No
Notes:
1 Exterior noise levels calculated at 5 feet above ground level. 2 Noise levels calculated from centerline of subject roadway.

5.0 Project Operational Noise Level Projections
Potential stationary noise sources include AC condensers and transformers. The condensers and transformers will be on grade. The project proposes a 6-foot CMU wall on the south, west, and east property lines. These barriers will provide a 13 dB transmission loss from the condensers to the adjacent building 40 ft to the east and a 6 dB transmission loss from the transformer to the adjacent building 60 ft to the west.

See Appendix D.

Typically, AC condenser units are no louder than 76 dBA at 1 ft from the source. At the nearest adjacent building 40 feet to the east, the noise level would be a maximum of 47 dBA after shielding from the wall.

According to NEMA standards, transformers are up to 64 dBA at 1 ft from the source. At the nearest adjacent building 60 feet to the west, the noise level would be a maximum of 40 dBA after shielding prom the wall.

These equipment levels fall below the predicted ambient levels, which could average as low as 66 dBA Leq at night per the FHWA TNM (see Appendix B).

6.0 Construction Noise Level Projections
The degree of construction noise may vary for different areas of the project site and may also vary depending on the construction activities. Noise levels associated with the construction will vary with the different phases of construction.

The projected construction noise levels at the closest sensitive receptor, the residences to the west, are presented in Table 4. Leq noise levels are projected from the center of the project site per the FTA Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual. Lmax levels were projected from the edges of the site.

Calculations are in Appendix C.

Dale Avenue Project
Cat32 Exemption Noise Impact Assessment
Anaheim City, CA
MD Acoustics, LLC 5
JN: 03322203_Letter Report
Table 4: Projected Construction Noise Levels (dBA, Leq))1 Location Phase Construction
Noise Level (dBA, Leq)
West Residences
Demo 77
Site Prep 73
Grade 75
Build 75
Paving 79
Finish 65
Notes:

1. Construction noise projected from property line to nearest sensitive use (structure).

Anaheim does not have a not-to-exceed standard for construction noise; therefore, the project will comply as long as the construction activities take place during the allowable times, as specified in Section 6.70.010 the municipal code.

The following practices are recommended to further reduce construction noise levels:

1. Demolition and construction activities shall be scheduled so as to avoid operating several pieces of equipment simultaneously, which causes high noise levels.

2. The project contractor shall use power constriction equipment with state-of-the-art noise shielding and muffling devices.

3. Any stationary equipment such as cranes or generators shall be placed as far from sensitive receptors as possible.

4. Equipment shall be maintained so that vehicles and their loads are secured from rattling and banging.

5. Idling equipment shall be turned off when not in use.

7.0 Conclusions
The Project will be compliant with the City’s noise ordinance during operation and construction. In addition, the project will not generate a noise impact during operation. MD is pleased to provide this noise assessment for the proposed project. If you have any questions regarding this analysis, please call our office at (805) 426-4477.

Sincerely,
MD Acoustics, LLC
Claire Pincock, INCE-USA
Acoustical Consultant
Dale Avenue Project
Cat32 Exemption Noise Impact Assessment
Anaheim City, CA
MD Acoustics, LLC 6
JN: 03322203_Letter Report
Exhibit A
Location Map
Dale Avenue Project
Cat32 Exemption Noise Impact Assessment
Anaheim City, CA
MD Acoustics, LLC 7
JN: 03322203_Letter Report
Exhibit B
Site Plan
Appendix A
Glossary of Acoustical Terms
Glossary of Terms
A-Weighted Sound Level: The sound pressure level in decibels as measured on a sound level meter using the A-weighted filter network. The A-weighting filter de-emphasizes the very low and very high frequency components of the sound in a manner similar to the response of the human ear. A numerical method of rating human judgment of loudness.

Ambient Noise Level: The composite of noise from all sources, near and far. In this context, the ambient noise level constitutes the normal or existing level of environmental noise at a given location.

Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL): The average equivalent A-weighted sound level during a 24-hour day, obtained after addition of five (5) decibels to sound levels in the evening from 7:00 to 10:00 PM and after addition of ten (10) decibels to sound levels in the night before 7:00 AM and after 10:00 PM.

Decibel (dB): A unit for measuring the amplitude of a sound, equal to 20 times the logarithm to the base 10 of the ratio of the pressure of the sound measured to the reference pressure, which is 20 micro-pascals.
dB(A): A-weighted sound level (see definition above).

Equivalent Sound Level (LEQ): The sound level corresponding to a steady noise level over a given sample period with the same amount of acoustic energy as the actual time varying noise level. The energy average noise level during the sample period.

Habitable Room: Any room meeting the requirements of the Uniform Building Code or other applicable regulations which is intended to be used for sleeping, living, cooking or dining purposes, excluding such enclosed spaces as closets, pantries, bath or toilet rooms, service rooms, connecting corridors, laundries, unfinished attics, foyers, storage spaces, cellars, utility rooms and similar spaces.

L(n): The A-weighted sound level exceeded during a certain percentage of the sample time. For example, L10 in the sound level exceeded 10 percent of the sample time. Similarly L50, L90 and L99, etc.

Noise: Any unwanted sound or sound which is undesirable because it interferes with speech and hearing, or is intense enough to damage hearing, or is otherwise annoying. The State Noise Control Act defines noise as "...excessive undesirable sound...".

Noise Criteria (NC) Method: This metric plots octave band sound levels against a family of reference curves, with the number rating equal to the highest tangent line value as demonstrated in Figure

1. Percent Noise Levels: See L(n).

Room Criterion (RC) Method: When sound quality
in the space is important, the RC metric provides a
diagnostic tool to quantify both the speech
interference level and spectral imbalance.

Sound Level (Noise Level): The weighted sound
pressure level obtained by use of a sound level
meter having a standard frequency-filter for
attenuating part of the sound spectrum.

Sound Level Meter: An instrument, including a
microphone, an amplifier, an output meter, and
frequency weighting networks for the
measurement and determination of noise and
sound levels.

Sound Transmission Class (STC): To quantify STC, a Transmission Loss (TL) measurement is performed in a laboratory over a range of 16 third-octave bands between 125 – 4,000 Hertz (Hz).

The average human voice creates sound within the 125 – 4,000 Hz 1/3rd octave bands.

STC is a single-number rating given to a particular material or assembly. The STC rating measures the ability of a material or an assembly to resist airborne sound transfer over the specified frequencies (see ASTM International Classification E413 and E90). In general, a higher STC rating corresponds with a greater reduction of noise transmitting through a partition.

STC is highly dependent on the construction of the partition. The STC of a partition can be increased by: adding mass, increasing or adding air space, adding absorptive materials within the assembly.

The STC rating does not assess low frequency sound transfer (e.g. sounds less than 125 Hz). Special consideration must be given to spaces where the noise transfer concern has lower frequencies than speech, such as mechanical equipment and or/or music. The STC rating is a lab test that does not take into consideration weak points, penetrations, or flanking paths.

Even with a high STC rating, any penetration, air-gap, or “flanking path can seriously degrade the isolation quality of a wall. Flanking paths are the means for sound to transfer from one space to another other than through the wall. Sound can flank over, under, or around a wall. Sound can also travel through common ductwork, plumbing or corridors. Noise will travel between spaces at the weakest points. Typically, there is no reason to spend money or effort to improve the walls until all weak points are controlled first.

FIGURE 1: Sample NC Curves and
Sample Spectrum Levels
Outdoor Living Area: Outdoor spaces that are associated with residential land uses typically used for passive recreational activities or other noise-sensitive uses. Such spaces include patio areas, barbecue areas, jacuzzi areas, etc. associated with residential uses; outdoor patient recovery or resting areas associated with hospitals, convalescent hospitals, or rest homes; outdoor areas associated with places of worship which have a significant role in services or other noise-sensitive activities; and outdoor school facilities routinely used for educational purposes which may be adversely impacted by noise. Outdoor areas usually not included in this definition are: front yard areas, driveways, greenbelts, maintenance areas and storage areas associated with residential land uses; exterior areas at hospitals that are not used for patient activities; outdoor areas associated with places of worship and principally used for short-term social gatherings; and, outdoor areas associated with school facilities that are not typically associated with educational uses prone to adverse noise impacts (for example, school play yard areas).

Percent Noise Levels: See L(n).

Sound Level (Noise Level): The weighted sound pressure level obtained by use of a sound level meter having a standard frequency-filter for attenuating part of the sound spectrum.

Sound Level Meter: An instrument, including a microphone, an amplifier, an output meter, and frequency weighting networks for the measurement and determination of noise and sound levels.

Single Event Noise Exposure Level (SENEL): The dB(A) level which, if it lasted for one second, would produce the same A-weighted sound energy as the actual event.

Appendix B
Traffic Noise Calculations Input/Outputs
DISTRICT ROUTE RTE_SFX COUNTY PM_PFXPM PM_SFXDESCRIPTION BACK_PEAK_HOUR BACK_PEAK_MADT BACK_AADT AHEAD_PEAK_HOUR AHEAD_PEAK_MADT AHEAD_AADT 12 005 ORA 42.100 R FULLERTON, JCT. RTE. 91 10800 148000 136500 12500 131000 117250 12 005 ORA 42.100 L FULLERTON, JCT. RTE. 91 8300 115000 105000 7800 118000 107000 12 091 ORA R 3.638 R FULLERTON, JCT. RTE. 5 12200 169000 159500 9000 126000 120200 RTE RTE_SFX DIST CNTY POSTMILE_PFX POSTMILE POSTMILE_SFX LEG DESCRIPTION VEHICLE_AADT_TOTAL TRUCK_AADT_TOTAL TRK_PERCENT_TOT TRK_2_AXLE TRK_3_AXLE TRK_4_AXLE TRK_5_AXLE TRK_2_AXLE_PCT TRK_3_AXLE_PCT TRK_4_AXLE_PCT TRK_5_AXLE_PCT EAL YEAR_VER EST 005 12 ORA 42.100 R B FULLERTON, JCT. RTE. 91, RIVERSIDE/ARTESIA FREEWAYS 136500 11603 8.50 6,150 1,334 325 3,794 53.00 11.50 2.80 32.70 1,695 19 E 005 12 ORA 42.100 R A FULLERTON, JCT. RTE. 91, RIVERSIDE/ARTESIA FREEWAYS 117250 11139 9.50 5,101 837 547 4,655 45.79 7.51 4.91 41.79 1,942 19 E 091 12 ORA R 3.638 R A FULLERTON, JCT. RTE. 5, SANTA ANA FREEWAY 120200 9015 7.50 4,985 956 595 2,479 55.30 10.60 6.60 27.50 1,205 19 E I-5 0.9150 0.0451 0.0399
SR-91 0.9250 0.0415 0.0335
Average 0.9200 0.0433 0.0367
Auto Med Heavy
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
PROJECT: Dale Avenue Project - Cat32 JOB #: 0332-22-03
ROADWAY: I-5 DATE: 5-Apr-22
LOCATION: Rte 91 Jct. ENGINEER:C Pincock
ADT = 136,500 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 850
SPEED = 65 DIST C/L TO WALL = 730
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5.0
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 150 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 120 ROAD ELEVATION = 0.0 PAD ELEVATION = 0.0
GRADE = 0.0 % ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE= -90
PK HR VOL = 10,800 RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE= 180
AUTOMOBILES = 15 HTH WALL= 0.0
MEDIUM TRUCKS = 15 (10 = HARD SITE, 15 = SOFT SITE) AMBIENT= 0.0 HEAVY TRUCKS = 15 BARRIER = 1 (0 = WALL, 1 = BERM)

VEHICLE TYPE EVENING NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE AUTOMOBILES 0.140 0.105 0.9200 AUTOMOBILES 27.0 846.97
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.022 0.489 0.0433 MEDIUM TRUCKS 29.0 847.02 HEAVY TRUCKS 0.055 0.473 0.0367 HEAVY TRUCKS 33.0 847.15

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 62.3 61.3 60.0 54.0 62.4 63.1
MEDIUM TRUCKS 55.2 52.4 44.9 53.6 59.8 59.8
HEAVY TRUCKS 58.0 55.0 51.7 56.2 62.4 62.5
NOISE LEVELS (dBA) 64.3 62.7 60.8 59.6 66.5 66.8
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 520 1120 2412 5197
LDN 496 1069 2303 4962
VEHICLE MIX DATA MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)

DAY GRADE ADJUSTMENT

0.755 - -

0.489 - -

0.473 0.00

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

NOISE IMPACTS (WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING)
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
PROJECT: Dale Avenue Project - Cat32 JOB #: 0332-22-03
ROADWAY: SR-91 DATE: 5-Apr-22
LOCATION: Rte 5 Jct. ENGINEER:C Pincock
ADT = 159,500 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 375
SPEED = 65 DIST C/L TO WALL = 300
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5.0
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 150 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 75 ROAD ELEVATION = 0.0 PAD ELEVATION = 0.0
GRADE = 1.0 % ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE= -90
PK HR VOL = 12,200 RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE= 180
AUTOMOBILES = 15 HTH WALL= 0.0
MEDIUM TRUCKS = 15 (10 = HARD SITE, 15 = SOFT SITE) AMBIENT= 0.0 HEAVY TRUCKS = 15 BARRIER = 1 (0 = WALL, 1 = BERM)

VEHICLE TYPE EVENING NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE AUTOMOBILES 0.140 0.105 0.9200 AUTOMOBILES 27.0 368.08
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.022 0.489 0.0433 MEDIUM TRUCKS 29.0 368.21 HEAVY TRUCKS 0.055 0.473 0.0367 HEAVY TRUCKS 33.0 368.49

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 68.3 67.5 66.2 60.1 68.6 69.2
MEDIUM TRUCKS 61.2 58.5 51.0 59.7 65.9 65.9
HEAVY TRUCKS 64.0 61.1 57.8 62.3 68.5 68.6
NOISE LEVELS (dBA) 70.2 68.8 66.9 65.7 72.6 72.9
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 585 1261 2716 5851
LDN 559 1203 2593 5586

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)

DAY GRADE ADJUSTMENT

0.755 - -

0.489 - -

0.473 0.00

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

NOISE IMPACTS (WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE MIX DATA MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
PROJECT: Dale Avenue Project - Cat32 JOB #: 0332-22-03
ROADWAY: I-5 DATE: 5-Apr-22
LOCATION: Rte 91 Jct. +P ENGINEER:C Pincock
ADT = 136,622 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 850
SPEED = 65 DIST C/L TO WALL = 730
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5.0
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 150 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 120 ROAD ELEVATION = 0.0 PAD ELEVATION = 0.0
GRADE = 0.0 % ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE= -90
PK HR VOL = 10,800 RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE= 180
AUTOMOBILES = 15 HTH WALL= 0.0
MEDIUM TRUCKS = 15 (10 = HARD SITE, 15 = SOFT SITE) AMBIENT= 0.0 HEAVY TRUCKS = 15 BARRIER = 1 (0 = WALL, 1 = BERM)

VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 62.3 61.4 60.1 54.0 62.4 63.1
MEDIUM TRUCKS 55.2 52.4 44.9 53.6 59.8 59.8
HEAVY TRUCKS 58.0 55.0 51.7 56.2 62.4 62.5
NOISE LEVELS (dBA) 64.3 62.7 60.8 59.6 66.5 66.8
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 520 1120 2414 5200
LDN 496 1070 2304 4965
VEHICLE MIX DATA MISC. VEHICLE INFO

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)

DAY GRADE ADJUSTMENT

0.755 - -

0.489 - -

0.473 0.00

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

NOISE IMPACTS (WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING)
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
PROJECT: Dale Avenue Project - Cat32 JOB #: 0332-22-03
ROADWAY: SR-91 DATE: 5-Apr-22
LOCATION: Rte 5 Jct. +P ENGINEER:C Pincock
ADT = 159,622 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 375
SPEED = 65 DIST C/L TO WALL = 300
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5.0
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 150 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 75 ROAD ELEVATION = 0.0 PAD ELEVATION = 0.0
GRADE = 1.0 % ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE= -90
PK HR VOL = 12,200 RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE= 180
AUTOMOBILES = 15 HTH WALL= 0.0
MEDIUM TRUCKS = 15 (10 = HARD SITE, 15 = SOFT SITE) AMBIENT= 0.0 HEAVY TRUCKS = 15 BARRIER = 1 (0 = WALL, 1 = BERM)

NOISE INPUT DATA

ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA

SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION

NOISE CONTOUR (FT)

DAY GRADE ADJUSTMENT

0.755 - -

0.489 - -

0.473 0.00

NOISE OUTPUT DATA

NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)

NOISE IMPACTS (WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING)
Appendix C
Construction Noise Calculations
Construction Phase Equipment
Item
# of Items
Item Lmax at 50
feet, dBA1
Edge of Site to
Receptor, feet
Center of Site to
Receptor, feet
Item Usage
Percent1 Ground Factor2 Usage Factor
Receptor Item
Lmax, dBA
Recptor. Item
Leq, dBA
DEMO

1. Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 90 10 125 20 0.66 0.20 108.6 72.4

2. Rubber Tired Dozers 1 85 10 125 40 0.66 0.40 103.6 70.4

3. Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 84 10 125 40 0.66 0.40 102.6 69.4 108.6 76.6

SITE PREP

1. Graders 1 85 10 125 40 0.66 0.40 103.6 70.4

2. Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 84 10 125 40 0.66 0.40 102.6 69.4 Log Sum 103.6 73.0
GRADE

1. Graders 1 85 10 125 40 0.66 0.40 103.6 70.4

2. Rubber Tired Dozers 1 85 10 125 40 0.66 0.40 103.6 70.4

3. Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 84 10 125 40 0.66 0.40 102.6 69.4 103.6 74.9
BUILD

1. Cranes 1 85 10 125 16 0.66 0.16 103.6 66.5

2. Forklifts 2 85 10 125 20 0.66 0.20 103.6 67.4

3. Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 84 10 125 40 0.66 0.40 102.6 69.4 103.6 75.2
PAVE

1. Cemenet and Mortar Mixers 4 85 10 125 40 0.66 0.40 103.6 70.4

2. Pavers 1 85 10 125 50 0.66 0.50 103.6 71.4

3. Rollers 1 85 10 125 20 0.66 0.20 103.6 67.4

4. Tractors/Loaders/Backhose 1 84 10 125 40 0.66 0.40 102.6 69.4 103.6 78.6

ARCH COAT

1. Air Compressors 1 80 10 125 40 0.66 0.40 98.6 65.4

98.6 65.4
1 FHWA Construction Noise Handbook: Table 9.1 RCNM Default Noise Emission Reference Levels and Usage Factors Receptor - Residences to the West
Appendix D
Operational Noise Calculations

Product Specifications
SS-GSX13 www.goodmanmfg.com 3
GSX13
0181E*
GSX13
0181EH
GSX13
0181EJ
GSX13
0241E*
GSX13
0301B*
GSX13
0301L*
GSX13
0361E*
GSX13
0421B*
GSX13
0481B*
GSX13
0601B*
GSX13
0611A*
Capacities
Nominal Cooling (BTU/h) 18,000 18,000 18,000 23,000 30,000 30,000 36,000 42,000 48,000 60,000 60,000 SEER / EER 13/11 13/11 13/11 13/11 13/11 13 / 11 13/11 13/11 13/11 13/11 13/11 Decibels 75 75 75 75 73 74 74 75 76 77 72
Compressor
RLA 6.7 6.7 6.0 7.7 12.8 10.5 13.6 17.9 19.9 25.0 26.4
LRA 41 37.5 37.5 37 64 47 79 112 109 134 134
Stage Single Single Single Single Single Single Single Single Single Single Single Type Rotary Rotary Rotary Rotary Scroll Rotary Scroll Scroll Scroll Scroll Scroll Condenser Fan Motor
Horsepower 1/8 1/8 1/8 1/8 1/8 1/8 1/4 1/4 1/4 1/4 1/4
FLA 0.7 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.7 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.3
Refrigeration System
Refrigerant Line Size ¹
Liquid Line Size (“O.D.) ⅜" ⅜” ⅜” ⅜" ⅜" ⅜" ⅜" ⅜" ⅜" ⅜" ⅜" Suction Line Size (“O.D.) ¾" ¾” ¾” ¾" ¾" ¾" ⅞" 1⅛" 1⅛" 1⅛" ⅞" Refrigerant Connection Size
Liquid Valve Size (“O.D.) ⅜" ⅜” ⅜” ⅜" ⅜" ⅜" ⅜" ⅜" ⅜" ⅜" ⅜" Suction Valve Size (“O.D.) ⁴ ⁵ ¾" ¾” ¾” ¾" ¾" ¾" ¾" ⁴ ⅞" ⁵ ⅞" ⁵ ⅞" ⁵ ¾" Valve Type Sweat Sweat Sweat Sweat Sweat Sweat Sweat Sweat Sweat Sweat Sweat Refrigerant Charge 44 58 58 60 60 68 62 80 91 94 111
Shipped with Orifice Size 0.051 0.051 0.051 0.055 0.061 0.067 0.070 0.076 0.080 0.086 0.086 Electrical Data
Voltage (60 Hz) 208/230 208/230-60 208/230-60 208/230 208/230 208/230-60 208/230 208/230 208/230 208/230 208/230 Minimum Circuit Ampacity ² 9.1 9.1 8.2 10.3 16.7 13.8 19.0 23.8 26.3 32.7 34.3 Max. Overcurrent Protection ³ 15 amps 15 amps 15 amps 15 amps 25 amps 20 30 amps 40 amps 45 amps 50 amps 60 amps Min / Max Volts 197/253 197/253 197/253 197/253 197/253 197/253 197/253 197/253 197/253 197/253 197/253 Electrical Conduit Size ½" or ¾" ½” or ¾” ½” or ¾” ½" or ¾" ½" or ¾" ½" or ¾" ½" or ¾" ½" or ¾" ½" or ¾" ½" or ¾" ½" or ¾" Equipment Weight (lbs) 102 102 102 103 115 138 118 171 175 184 211 Ship Weight (lbs) 117 117 117 120 132 153 135 189 193 202 233 ¹ Line sizes denoted for 25’ line sets, tested and rated in accordance with AHRI Standard 210/240. For other line-set lengths or sizes, refer to the installation & Operating instructions and/or the long line-set guidelines. ² Wire size should be determined in accordance with National Electrical Codes; extensive wire runs will require larger wire sizes ³ Must use time-delay fuses or HACR-type circuit breakers of the same size as noted. ⁴ Installer will need to supply ¾” to ⅞” adapters for suction line connections. ⁵ Installer will need to supply ⅞” to 1⅛” adapters for suction line connections.

Notes
• Always check the S&R plate for electrical data on the unit being installed. • Unit is charged with refrigerant for 15’ of ⅜” liquid line. System charge must be adjusted per Installation Instructions Final Charge Procedure. • This product may not be installed in the Southeast (including Hawaii) or Southwest Regions as of Jan. 1, 2015.

Barrier insertion loss For Flat Ground
Receiver - North P/L
Enter variables here:

Source Height Hs(ft) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Receiver Height HR(ft) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Barrier Height HB(ft) 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Distance Source to barrier (ft) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Distance Receiver to Barrier (ft) 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 Soft Ground = 1; Hard Ground = 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Calculations
A 10.29563 10.816654 11.40175425 12.041595 12.727922 13.453624 14.21267 15 15.811388 16.643317 17.492856 18.35756 19.235384 20.124612 21.023796 21.931712 B 30.016662 30.066593 30.14962686 30.265492 30.413813 30.594117 30.805844 31.048349 31.32092 31.622777 31.953091 32.310989 32.695565 33.105891 33.54102 34 C 39.204592 39.204592 39.20459157 39.204592 39.204592 39.204592 39.204592 39.204592 39.204592 39.204592 39.204592 39.204592 39.204592 39.204592 39.204592 39.204592 P 1.1077006 1.678655 2.346789547 3.1024949 3.9371431 4.8431496 5.8139224 6.8437578 7.9277163 9.061502 10.241355 11.463957 12.726358 14.025911 15.360224 16.727121 Ground type Heff (with barrier) 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 Ground type Heff (no barrier) 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 Heff (with barrier) 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Heff no barrier 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
GB 0.5892857 0.5714286 0.553571429 0.5357143 0.5178571 0.5 0.4821429 0.4642857 0.4464286 0.4285714 0.4107143 0.3928571 0.375 0.3571429 0.3392857 0.3214286 GNB 0.6128571 0.6128571 0.612857143 0.6128571 0.6128571 0.6128571 0.6128571 0.6128571 0.6128571 0.6128571 0.6128571 0.6128571 0.6128571 0.6128571 0.6128571 0.6128571 Abarrier 13.439153 15.243255 16.69823608 17.910588 18.945287 19.844753 20.638167 21.346421 21.984955 22.565476 23.097049 23.58682 24.040516 24.462785 24.85745 25.227686 ILbarrier 13.5 15.0 15.1 15.1 15.1 15.1 15.1 15.2 15.2 15.2 15.2 15.2 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.3 Barrier Height (ft) IL (dBA)
6 13
7 15
8 15
9 15
10 15
11 15
12 15
13 15
14 15
15 15
16 15
17 15
18 15
19 15
20 15
21 15
Barrier insertion loss For Flat Ground
Receiver - North P/L
Enter variables here:

Source Height Hs(ft) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Receiver Height HR(ft) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Barrier Height HB(ft) 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Distance Source to barrier (ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Distance Receiver to Barrier (ft) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Soft Ground = 1; Hard Ground = 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Calculations
A 50.249378 50.358713 50.48762225 50.635956 50.803543 50.990195 51.195703 51.419841 51.662365 51.92302 52.201533 52.497619 52.810984 53.141321 53.488316 53.851648 B 10.049876 10.198039 10.44030651 10.77033 11.18034 11.661904 12.206556 12.806248 13.453624 14.142136 14.866069 15.620499 16.401219 17.204651 18.027756 18.867962 C 60.133186 60.133186 60.13318551 60.133186 60.133186 60.133186 60.133186 60.133186 60.133186 60.133186 60.133186 60.133186 60.133186 60.133186 60.133186 60.133186 P 0.1660682 0.4235668 0.794743241 1.2730997 1.8506976 2.5189134 3.269073 4.0929035 4.9828039 5.9319701 6.9344158 7.9849328 9.0790177 10.212786 11.382887 12.586425 Ground type Heff (with barrier) 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 Ground type Heff (no barrier) 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 Heff (with barrier) 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Heff no barrier 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
GB 0.5892857 0.5714286 0.553571429 0.5357143 0.5178571 0.5 0.4821429 0.4642857 0.4464286 0.4285714 0.4107143 0.3928571 0.375 0.3571429 0.3392857 0.3214286 GNB 0.6128571 0.6128571 0.612857143 0.6128571 0.6128571 0.6128571 0.6128571 0.6128571 0.6128571 0.6128571 0.6128571 0.6128571 0.6128571 0.6128571 0.6128571 0.6128571 Abarrier 5.6547677 9.3150085 12.00185678 14.042838 15.666922 17.005619 18.137722 19.11379 19.968212 20.725464 21.403573 22.016187 22.573863 23.084917 23.555999 23.992498 ILbarrier 5.6 9.3 12.0 14.0 14.9 14.9 14.9 14.9 14.9 14.9 14.8 14.8 14.8 14.8 14.8 14.8 Barrier Height (ft) IL (dBA)
6 6
7 9
8 12
9 14
10 15
11 15
12 15
13 15
14 15
15 15
16 15
17 15
18 15
19 15
20 15
21 15

APPENDIX E

AIR QUALITY/GREENHOUSE GAS/ENERGY IMPACT STUDY
Appendix E Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA
Prepared for:

Curtis Zacuto
Eco Tierra Consulting
5776-D Lindero Canyon Road #414
Westlake Village, CA 91362
Prepared by:

MD Acoustics, LLC
Tyler Klassen, EIT
1197 Los Angeles Ave, Ste C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Date: 4/11/2022
Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA TABLE OF CONTENTS
MD Acoustics, LLC ii
JN: 0332202204_Report

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................1

1.1 Purpose of Analysis and Study Objectives 1

1.2 Project Summary 1

1.2.1 Site Location 1

1.2.2 Project Description 1

1.2.3 Sensitive Receptors 2

1.3 Executive Summary of Findings and Mitigation Measures 2

2.0 Regulatory Framework and Background.................................................................................6

2.1 Air Quality Regulatory Setting 6

2.1.1 National and State 6

2.1.2 South Coast Air Quality Management District 8

2.1.3 Local 11

2.2 Greenhouse Gas Regulatory Setting 11

2.2.1 International 11

2.2.2 National 12

2.2.3 California 13

2.2.5 Local 22

2.3 Energy Regulatory Setting 23

2.3.1 Federal Regulations 23

2.3.2 State Regulations 24

2.3.3 City Regulations 29

3.0 Setting.................................................................................................................................31

3.1 Existing Physical Setting 31

3.1.1 Local Climate and Meteorology 31

3.1.2 Local Air Quality 32

3.1.3 Attainment Status 35

3.2 Greenhouse Gases 36

3.3 Energy 39

3.3.1 Overview 39

3.3.2 Electricity and Natural Gas 41

3.3.3 Transportation Energy Resources 43

4.0 Modeling Parameters and Assumptions...............................................................................44

4.1 Construction 44

4.2 Operations 44

4.3 Localized Construction Analysis 45

4.4 Localized Operational Analysis 46

5.0 Thresholds of Significance....................................................................................................47

5.1 Air Quality Thresholds of Significance 47

5.1.1 CEQA Guidelines for Air Quality 47
Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA TABLE OF CONTENTS
MD Acoustics, LLC iii
JN: 0332202204_Report

5.1.2 Regional Significance Thresholds for Construction Emissions 47

5.1.3 Regional Significance Thresholds for Operational Emissions 47

5.1.4 Thresholds for Localized Significance 48

5.2 Greenhouse Gas Thresholds of Significance 48

5.2.1 CEQA Guidelines for Greenhouse Gas 48

5.3 Energy Thresholds of Significance 49

6.0 Air Quality Emissions Impact................................................................................................50

6.1 Construction Air Quality Emissions Impact 50

6.1.1 Regional Construction Emissions 50

6.1.2 Localized Construction Emissions 51

6.1.3 Construction-Related Human Health Impacts 51

6.1.4 Odors 51

6.1.5 Construction-Related Toxic Air Contaminant Impact 52

6.2 Operational Air Quality Emissions Impact 52

6.2.1 Regional Operational Emissions 52

6.2.2 Localized Operational Emissions 53

6.2.3 Operations-Related Human Health Impacts 54

6.3 CO Hot Spot Emissions 54

6.4 Cumulative Regional Air Quality Impacts 55

6.5 Air Quality Compliance 55

7.0 Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis..........................................................................................58

7.1 Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact 58

7.2 Operational Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact 58

7.3 Greenhouse Gas Plan Consistency 59

8.0 Energy Analysis....................................................................................................................61

8.1 Construction Energy Demand 61

8.1.1 Construction Equipment Electricity Usage Estimates 61

8.1.2 Construction Equipment Fuel Estimates 62

8.1.3 Construction Worker Fuel Estimates 63

8.1.4 Construction Vendor/Hauling Fuel Estimates 63

8.1.5 Construction Energy Efficiency/Conservation Measures 64

8.2 Operational Energy Demand 65

8.2.1 Transportation Fuel Consumption 65

8.2.2 Facility Energy Demands (Electricity and Natural Gas) 66

8.3 Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Plan Consistency 66

9.0 References...........................................................................................................................68 Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA TABLE OF CONTENTS
MD Acoustics, LLC iv
JN: 0332202204_Report

LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A:

CalEEMod Daily Emission Output
Appendix B:

CalEEMod Annual Emission Output
Appendix C:

EMFAC 2017 Output

LIST OF EXHIBITS
Exhibit A ...........................................................................................................................................4 Location Map 4
Exhibit B ...........................................................................................................................................5 Site Plan 5

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Land Use Summary........................................................................................................................ 1 Table 2: Ambient Air Quality Standards ..................................................................................................... 7 Table 3: Meteorological Summary............................................................................................................ 32 Table 4: Local Area Air Quality Levels....................................................................................................... 33 Table 5: South Coast Air Basin Attainment Status.................................................................................... 35 Table 6: Description of Greenhouse Gases............................................................................................... 38 Table 7: Total Electricity System Power (California 2019)........................................................................ 40 Table 8: SDG&E 2019 Power Content Mix................................................................................................ 42 Table 9: Construction Equipment Assumptions1...................................................................................... 46 Table 10: Regional Significance - Construction Emissions (pounds/day) – Project.................................. 50 Table 11: Localized Significance – Construction....................................................................................... 51 Table 12: Regional Significance - Unmitigated Operational Emissions (lbs/day)..................................... 53 Table 13: Localized Significance – Unmitigated Operational Emissions................................................... 54 Table 14: Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions ................................................................................. 58 Table 15: Unmitigated Project-Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions........................................................ 59 Table 16: Project Consistency with the City of Anaheim GHG Reduction Plan........................................ 60 Table 17: Project Construction Power Cost and Electricity Usage ........................................................... 61 Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA TABLE OF CONTENTS
MD Acoustics, LLC v
JN: 0332202204_Report
Table 18: Construction Equipment Fuel Consumption Estimates............................................................ 62 Table 19: Construction Worker Fuel Consumption Estimates ................................................................. 63 Table 20: Construction Vendor Fuel Consumption Estimates (MHD Trucks)1......................................... 64 Table 21: Construction Hauling Fuel Consumption Estimates (HHD Trucks)1.......................................... 64 Table 22: Estimated Vehicle Operations Fuel Consumption .................................................................... 65 Table 23: Project Unmitigated Annual Operational Energy Demand Summary1..................................... 66 Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA TABLE OF CONTENTS
MD Acoustics, LLC vi
JN: 0332202204_Report

GLOSSARY OF TERMS
AQMP Air Quality Management Plan
CAAQS California Ambient Air Quality Standards
CARB California Air Resources Board
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CFCs Chlorofluorocarbons
CH4 Methane
CNG Compressed natural gas
CO Carbon monoxide
CO2 Carbon dioxide
CO2e Carbon dioxide equivalent
DPM Diesel particulate matter
GHG Greenhouse gas
HFCs Hydrofluorocarbons
LST Localized Significant Thresholds
MTCO2e Metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent
MMTCO2e Million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards
NOx Nitrogen Oxides
NO2 Nitrogen dioxide
N2O Nitrous oxide
O3 Ozone
PFCs Perfluorocarbons
PM Particle matter
PM10 Particles that are less than 10 micrometers in diameter PM2.5 Particles that are less than 2.5 micrometers in diameter PMI Point of maximum impact
PPM Parts per million
PPB Parts per billion
RTIP Regional Transportation Improvement Plan
RTP Regional Transportation Plan
SCAB South Coast Air Basin
SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District
SF6 Sulfur hexafluoride
SIP State Implementation Plan
SOx Sulfur Oxides
SRA Source/Receptor Area
TAC Toxic air contaminants
VOC Volatile organic compounds
WRCC Western Regional Climate Center
Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Introduction
1 1.0 Introduction

1.1 Purpose of Analysis and Study Objectives
This air quality/greenhouse gas (GHG)/energy analysis was prepared to evaluate whether the estimated criteria pollutants and GHG emissions generated from the project would cause a significant impact to the air resources in the project area as well as evaluate whether the estimated energy usage by the project would cause a significant impact to the local energy resources. This assessment was conducted within the context of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA, California Public Resources Code Sections 21000, et seq.). The assessment is consistent with the methodology and emission factors endorsed by South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), California Air Resource Board (CARB), and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA).

1.2 Project Summary

1.2.1 Site Location
The project site is located at 1442 North Dale Avenue in Anaheim, California, within the County of Orange, as shown in Exhibit A. Per the General Plan Land Use Map, the project site is designated low density residential with “T” Transition zone. The project site is surrounded by multi-family residential townhomes to the east, west and south and the townhome development’s visitor parking and community recreational facility (pool/spa and landscaped open space). The project site is bordered by landscaped slope of the Artesia Freeway (SR-91) to the north.

1.2.2 Project Description
The Project proposes the construction of 18 two-story single-family attached homes in a residential subdivision on an approximately 0.93-acres. Each unit will have a two-car garage with five additional open parking spaces onsite and a total of 6,409 square feet of open space. Exhibit B demonstrates the site plan for the project.

Construction activities within the Project area will consist of demolition of an existing single-family home, site preparation, grading including 475 cubic yards of export, building, paving, and architectural coating.

Table 1 summarizes the land use description for the Project Site.

Table 1: Land Use Summary
Land Use Unit Amount Size Metric
Condo/Townhouse High Rise1 18 Units
Enclosed Parking Structure 36 Space
Parking Lot 5 Space
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.13 Acre
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 6.41 Thousand SF
Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Introduction
2 1.2.3 Sensitive Receptors
Sensitive receptors are considered land uses or other types of population groups that are more sensitive to air pollution than others due to their exposure. Sensitive population groups include children, the elderly, the acutely and chronically ill, and those with cardio-respiratory diseases. For CEQA purposes, a sensitive receptor would be a location where a sensitive individual could remain for 24-hours or longer, such as residencies, hospitals, and schools (etc).

The closest existing sensitive receptors are the multi-family residential uses located approximately 40 feet to the east and to the west of the project site.

1.3 Executive Summary of Findings and Mitigation Measures The following is a summary of the analysis results:

Construction-Source Emissions
Project construction-source emissions would not exceed applicable regional thresholds of significance established by the SCAQMD. For localized emissions, the project will not exceed applicable Localized Significance Thresholds (LSTs) established by the SCAQMD.

Project construction-source emissions would not conflict with the Basin Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). As discussed herein, the project will comply with all applicable SCAQMD construction-source emission reduction rules and guidelines. Project construction source emissions would not cause or substantively contribute to violation of the California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) or National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS).

Established requirements addressing construction equipment operations, and construction material use, storage, and disposal requirements act to minimize odor impacts that may result from construction activities. Moreover, construction-source odor emissions would be temporary, short-term, and intermittent in nature and would not result in persistent impacts that would affect substantial numbers of people. Potential construction-source odor impacts are therefore considered less-than-significant.

Operational-Source Emissions
The project operational-sourced emissions would not exceed applicable regional thresholds of significance established by the SCAQMD. Project operational-source emissions would not result in or cause a significant localized air quality impact as discussed in the Operations-Related Local Air Quality Impacts section of this report. Additionally, project-related traffic will not cause or result in CO concentrations exceeding applicable state and/or federal standards (CO “hotspots). Project operationalsource emissions would therefore not adversely affect sensitive receptors within the vicinity of the project.

Project operational-source emissions would not conflict with the Basin Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). The project's emissions meet SCAQMD regional thresholds and will not result in a significant cumulative impact. The project does not propose any such uses or activities that would result in potentially significant operational-source odor impacts. Potential operational-source odor impacts are therefore considered less-than significant.

Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Introduction
3 Project-related GHG emissions meet the SCAQMD screening threshold of 3,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents (MTCO2e) per year and are also considered to be less than significant. The project also complies with the goals of the CARB Scoping Plan, AB-32, and SB-32.

Neither construction nor operation of the project would result in wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy, or wasteful use of energy resources. The proposed project does not include any unusual project characteristics or construction processes that would require the use of equipment that would be more energy intensive than is used for comparable activities and is an industrial project that is not proposing any additional features that would require a larger energy demand than other industrial projects of similar scale and configuration
Mitigation Measures
A. Construction Measures
Adherence to SCAQMD Rules 402, 403, 445, 1113, 1143, 1403, and CARB's Idling Diesel Vehicle Trucks rule is required.

No construction mitigation required.

B. Operational Measures to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions The measures listed below are either required through regulation (compliance with Title 24, CALGreen for example) and/or part of the project’s sustainable design.

No operational mitigation required.

Exhibit A
Location Map
4 Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Study
City of Anaheim
Site
Dale Avenue
Exhibit B
Site Plan
5 Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Study
City of Anaheim
Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Regulatory Framework and Background 6 2.0 Regulatory Framework and Background

2.1 Air Quality Regulatory Setting
Air pollutants are regulated at the national, state, and air basin level; each agency has a different level of regulatory responsibility. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulates at the national level. The California Air Resources Board (ARB) regulates at the state level. The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) regulates at the air basin level.

2.1.1 National and State
The EPA is responsible for global, international, and interstate air pollution issues and policies. The EPA sets national vehicle and stationary source emission standards, oversees approval of all State Implementation Plans, provides research and guidance for air pollution programs, and sets National Air Quality Standards, also known as federal standards. There are six common air pollutants, called criteria pollutants, which were identified from the provisions of the Clean Air Act of 1970. • Ozone
• Nitrogen Dioxide
• Lead
• Particulate Matter (PM10 and PM2.5)
• Carbon Monoxide
• Particulate Matter
• Sulfur Dioxide
The federal standards were set to protect public health, including that of sensitive individuals; thus, the standards continue to change as more medical research is available regarding the health effects of the criteria pollutants. Primary federal standards are the levels of air quality necessary, with an adequate margin of safety, to project the public health.

A State Implementation Plan is a document prepared by each state describing existing air quality conditions and measures that will be followed to attain and maintain federal standards. The State Implementation Plan for the State of California is administered by the ARB, which has overall responsibility for statewide air quality maintenance and air pollution prevention. California’s State Implementation Plan incorporates individual federal attainment plans for regional air districts—air district prepares their federal attainment plan, which sent to ARB to be approved and incorporated into the California State Implementation Plan. Federal attainment plans include the technical foundation for understanding air quality (e.g., emission inventories and air quality monitoring), control measures and strategies, and enforcement mechanisms. See http://www.arb.ca.gov/research/aaqs/aaqs.htm for additional information on criteria pollutants and air quality standards.

The federal and state ambient air quality standards are summarized in Table 2 and can also be found at http://www.arb.ca.gov/research/aaqs/aaqs2.pdf.

Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Regulatory Framework and Background 7 Table 2: Ambient Air Quality Standards
Pollutant Averaging Time
California Standards1 National Standards2
Concentrations3 Method4 Primary3,5 Secondary3,6 Method7 Ozone (O3)
1-Hour 0.09 ppm Ultraviolet
Photometry
- - Same as
Primary
Standard
Ultraviolet
8-Hour 0.070 ppm 0.070 ppm (147 μg/m Photometry 3)
Respirable
Particulate Matter
(PM10)8
24-Hour 50 μg/m3
Gravimetric or Beta
Attenuation
150 μ/m3 Same as
Primary
Standard
Inertial Separation
and Gravimetric
Analysis Annual Arithmetic Mean 20 μg/m3
- -
Fine Particulate
Matter (PM2.5)8
24-Hour - - - - 35 μg/m3
Same as
Primary
Standard
Inertial Separation
and Gravimetric
Analysis Annual Arithmetic Mean 12 μg/m3
Gravimetric or Beta
Attenuation 12 μg/m3 15 μg/m3
Carbon Monoxide
(CO)
1-Hour 20 ppm (23 μg/m3)
Non-Dispersive
Infrared Photometry
(NDIR)
35 ppm (40 μg/m3) - -
Non-Dispersive
Infrared
Photometry (NDIR)
8-Hour 9.0 ppm (10 μg/m3) 9 ppm (10 μg/m3) - -
8-Hour
(Lake Tahoe) 6 ppm (7 μg/m3
) - - - -
Nitrogen Dioxide
(NO2)
9 1-Hour 0.18 ppm (339 μg/m3)
Gas Phase
Chemiluminescence
100 ppb (188 μg/m3) - -
Gas Phase
Annual Arithmetic Mean 0.030 ppm (357 μg/m Chemiluminescence 3) 0.053 ppm (100 μg/m3) Same as
Primary
Standard
Sulfur Dioxide
(SO2)
10 1-Hour 0.25 ppm (655 μg/m3)
Ultraviolet
Fluorescence
75 ppb (196 μg/m3) - -
Ultraviolet
Fluorescence;
Spectrophotometry
(Pararosaniline
Method)
3-Hour - - - -

0.5 ppm
(1300 mg/m3)
24-Hour 0.04 ppm (105 μg/m3)

0.14 ppm
(for certain areas)10 - -
Annual Arithmetic Mean - -

0.130ppm
(for certain areas)10 - -
Lead11,12
30 Day Average 1.5 μg/m3
Atomic Absorption
- -
Calendar Qrtr - -

1.5 μg/m3
(for certain areas)12 Same as
Primary
Standard
High Volume
Sampler and
Atomic Absorption Rolling 3-Month
Average - - 0.15 μg/m3
Visibility Reducing
Particles13 8-Hour See footnote 13
Beta Attenuation and
Transmittance
through Filter Tape No
National
Standards
Sulfates 24-Hour 25 μg/m3Ion Chromatography
Hydrogen Sulfide 1-Hour 0.03 ppm (42 μg/m3)
Ultraviolet
Fluorescence
Vinyl Chloride11 24-Hour 0.01 ppm (26 μg/m3) Gas Chromatography Notes:

1. California standards for ozone, carbon monoxide (except 8-hour Lake Tahoe), sulfur dioxide (1 and 24 hour), nitrogen dioxide, and particulate matter (PM10, PM2.5, and visibility reducing particles), are values that are not to be exceeded. All others are not to be equaled or exceeded. California ambient air quality standards are listed in the Table of Standards in Section 70200 of Title 17 of the California Code of Regulations.

2. National standards (other than ozone, particulate matter, and those based on annual arithmetic mean) are not to be exceeded more than once a year.

The ozone standard is attained when the fourth highest 8-hour concentration measured at each site in a year, averaged over three years, is equal to or less than the standard. For PM10, the 24 hour standard is attained when the expected number of days per calendar year with a 24-hour average concentration above 150 μg/m3is equal to or less than one. For PM2.5, the 24 hour standard is attained when 98 percent of the daily concentrations, averaged over three years, are equal to or less than the standard. Contact the U.S. EPA for further clarification and current national policies.

3. Concentration expressed first in units in which it was promulgated. Equivalent units given in parentheses are based upon a reference temperature of 25°C and a reference pressure of 760 torr. Most measurements of air quality are to be corrected to a reference temperature of 25°C and a reference pressure of 760 torr; ppm in this table refers to ppm by volume, or micromoles of pollutant per mole of gas.

4. Any equivalent measurement method which can be shown to the satisfaction of the ARB to give equivalent results at or near the level of the air quality standard may be used.

5. National Primary Standards: The levels of air quality necessary, with an adequate margin of safety to protect the public health.

6. National Secondary Standards: The levels of air quality necessary to protect the public welfare from any known or anticipated adverse effects of a pollutant.

7. Reference method as described by the U.S. EPA. An “equivalent method” of measurement may be used but must have a “consistent relationship to the reference method” and must be approved by the U.S. EPA.

Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Regulatory Framework and Background 8 8. On December 14, 2012, the national annual PM2.5 primary standard was lowered from 15 μg/m3to 12.0 μg/m3. The existing national 24-hour PM2.5 standards (primary and secondary) were retained at 35 μg/m3, as was the annual secondary standard of 15 μg/m3. The existing 24-hour PM10 standards (primary and secondary) of 150 μg/m3 also were retained. The form of the annual primary and secondary standards is the annual mean, averaged over 3 years.

9. To attain the 1-hour national standard, the 3-year average of the annual 98th percentile of the 1-hour daily maximum concentrations at each site must not exceed 100 ppb. Note that the national 1-hour standard is in units of parts per billion (ppb). California standards are in units of parts per million (ppm). To directly compare the national 1-hour standard to the California standards the units can be converted from ppb to ppm. In this case, the national standard of 100 ppb is identical to 0.100 ppm.

10. On June 2, 2010, a new 1-hour SO2 standard was established and the existing 24-hour and annual primary standards were revoked. To attain the 1- hour national standard, the 3-year average of the annual 99th percentile of the 1-hour daily maximum concentrations at each site must not exceed 75 ppb. The 1971 SO2 national standards (24-hour and annual) remain in effect until one year after an area is designated for the 2010 standard, except that in areas designated nonattainment for the 1971 standards, the 1971 standards remain in effect until implementation plans to attain or maintain the 2010 standards are approved.

Note that the 1-hour national standard is in units of parts per billion (ppb). California standards are in units of parts per million (ppm). To directly compare the 1-hour national standard to the California standard the units can be converted to ppm. In this case, the national standard of 75 ppb is identical to 0.075 ppm.

11. The ARB has identified lead and vinyl chloride as 'toxic air contaminants' with no threshold level of exposure for adverse health effects determined.

These actions allow for the implementation of control measures at levels below the ambient concentrations specified for these pollutants.

12. The national standard for lead was revised on October 15, 2008 to a rolling 3-month average. The 1978 lead standard (1.5 μg/m3 as a quarterly average) remains in effect until one year after an area is designated for the 2008 standard, except that in areas designated nonattainment for the 1978 standard, the 1978 standard remains in effect until implementation plans to attain or maintain the 2008 standard are approved.

13. In 1989, the ARB converted both the general statewide 10-mile visibility standard and the Lake Tahoe 30-mile visibility standard to instrumental equivalents, which are "extinction of 0.23 per kilometer" and "extinction of 0.07 per kilometer" for the statewide and Lake Tahoe Air Basin standards, respectively.

Several pollutants listed in Table 2 are not addressed in this analysis. Analysis of lead is not included in this report because the project is not anticipated to emit lead. Visibility-reducing particles are not explicitly addressed in this analysis because particulate matter is addressed. The project is not expected to generate or be exposed to vinyl chloride because proposed project uses do not utilize the chemical processes that create this pollutant and there are no such uses in the project vicinity. The proposed project is not expected to cause exposure to hydrogen sulfide because it would not generate hydrogen sulfide in any substantial quantity.

2.1.2 South Coast Air Quality Management District
The agency for air pollution control for the South Coast Air Basin (basin) is the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). SCAQMD is responsible for controlling emissions primarily from stationary sources. SCAQMD maintains air quality monitoring stations throughout the basin. SCAQMD, in coordination with the Southern California Association of Governments, is also responsible for developing, updating, and implementing the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) for the basin. An AQMP is a plan prepared and implemented by an air pollution district for a county or region designated as nonattainment of the federal and/or California ambient air quality standards. The term nonattainment area is used to refer to an air basin where one or more ambient air quality standards are exceeded.

Every three (3) years the SCAQMD prepares a new AQMP, updating the previous plan and having a 20- year horizon.

Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Regulatory Framework and Background 9 On March 23, 2017 CARB approved the 2016 AQMP. The 2016 AQMP is a regional blueprint for achieving the federal air quality standards and healthful air.

The 2016 AQMP includes both stationary and mobile source strategies to ensure that rapidly approaching attainment deadlines are met, that public health is protected to the maximum extent feasible, and that the region is not faced with burdensome sanctions if the Plan is not approved or if the NAAQS are not met on time. As with every AQMP, a comprehensive analysis of emissions, meteorology, atmospheric chemistry, regional growth projections, and the impact of existing control measures is updated with the latest data and methods. The most significant air quality challenge in the Basin is to reduce nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions sufficiently to meet the upcoming ozone standard deadlines. The primary goal of the 2016 AQMP is to meet clean air standards and protect public health, including ensuring benefits to environmental justice and disadvantaged communities. Now that the plan has been approved by CARB, it has been forwarded to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for its review. If approved by EPA, the plan becomes federally enforceable.

South Coast AQMD has initiated the development of the 2022 AQMP to address the attainment of the 2015 8-hour ozone standard (70 ppb) for South Coast Air Basin and Coachella Valley. To support the development of mobile source strategies for the 2022 AQMP, South Coast AQMD, in conjunction with California Air Resources Board, has established Mobile Source Working Groups which are open to all interested parties.

South Coast Air Quality Management District Rules
The AQMP for the basin establishes a program of rules and regulations administered by SCAQMD to obtain attainment of the state and federal standards. Some of the rules and regulations that apply to this Project include, but are not limited to, the following:

SCAQMD Rule 402 prohibits a person from discharging from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property.

SCAQMD Rule 403 governs emissions of fugitive dust during construction and operation activities.

Compliance with this rule is achieved through application of standard Best Management Practices, such as application of water or chemical stabilizers to disturbed soils, covering haul vehicles, restricting vehicle speeds on unpaved roads to 15 miles per hour, sweeping loose dirt from paved site access roadways, cessation of construction activity when winds exceed 25 mph, and establishing a permanent ground cover on finished sites.

Rule 403 requires that fugitive dust be controlled with best available control measures so that the presence of such dust does not remain visible in the atmosphere beyond the property line of the emission source. In addition, Rule 403 requires implementation of dust suppression techniques to Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Regulatory Framework and Background 10 prevent fugitive dust from creating a nuisance off site. Applicable suppression techniques are indicated below and include but are not limited to the following:
• Apply nontoxic chemical soil stabilizers according to manufacturers’ specifications to all inactive construction areas (previously graded areas in active for 10 days or more). • Water active sites at least three times daily.
• Cover all trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials, or maintain at least 2 feet of freeboard in accordance with the requirements of California Vehicle Code (CVC) section 23114. • Pave construction access roads at least 100 feet onto the site from the main road. • Reduce traffic speeds on all unpaved roads to 15 mph or less. • Suspension of all grading activities when wind speeds (including instantaneous wind gusts) exceed 25 mph.
• Bumper strips or similar best management practices shall be provided where vehicles enter and exit the construction site onto paved roads or wash off trucks and any equipment leaving the site each trip.
• Replanting disturbed areas as soon as practical.
• During all construction activities, construction contractors shall sweep on-site and off-site streets if silt is carried to adjacent public thoroughfares, to reduce the amount of particulate matter on public streets.

SCAQMD Rule 1113 governs the sale, use, and manufacturing of architectural coating and limits the VOC content in paints and paint solvents. This rule regulates the VOC content of paints available during construction. Therefore, all paints and solvents used during construction and operation of project must comply with Rule 1113.

SCAQMD Rule 1143 governs the sale, use, and manufacturing of consumer paint thinners and multipurpose solvents and limits the VOC content in paint thinners and paint solvents. This rule regulates the VOC content of paint thinners available during construction. Therefore, all paint thinners and solvents used during construction and operation of project must comply with Rule 1143.

Idling Diesel Vehicle Trucks – Idling for more than 5 minutes in any one location is prohibited within California borders.

Rule 1403 establishes notification and work practice requirements to limit asbestos emissions from building demolition and renovation activities. This rule requires a survey for the presence of AsbestosContaining Materials (ACM) to be conducted and documented prior to the commencement of any demolition or renovation.

Rule 2702. The SCAQMD adopted Rule 2702 on February 6, 2009, which establishes a voluntary air quality investment program from which SCAQMD can collect funds from parties that desire certified GHG emission reductions, pool those funds, and use them to purchase or fund GHG emission reduction projects within two years, unless extended by the Governing Board. Priority will be given to projects that result in co-benefit emission reductions of GHG emissions and criteria or toxic air pollutants within Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Regulatory Framework and Background 11 environmental justice areas. Further, this voluntary program may compete with the cap-and-trade program identified for implementation in CARB’s Scoping Plan, or a Federal cap and trade program.

2.1.3 Local
Local jurisdictions, such as the City of Anaheim, have the authority and responsibility to reduce air pollution through their police power and decision-making authority. Specifically, the City is responsible for the assessment and mitigation of air emissions resulting from its land use decisions. The City is also responsible for the implementation of transportation control measures as outlined in the 2016 AQMP.

Examples of such measures include bus turnouts, energy-efficient streetlights, and synchronized traffic signals. In accordance with CEQA requirements and the CEQA review process, the City assesses the air quality impacts of new development projects, requires mitigation of potentially significant air quality impacts by conditioning discretionary permits, and monitors and enforces implementation of such mitigation.

The City relies on the expertise of the SCAQMD and utilizes the SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook as the guidance document for the environmental review of plans and development proposals within its jurisdiction.

City of Anaheim General Plan
The City of Anaheim General Plan 2035 under Air Quality and Climate Change contains the following air quality-related goals and policies that are applicable to the proposed project:

Goal 11.1
Encourage land planning and urban design that support alternatives to the private automobile such as mixed-use, provision of pedestrian and bicycle amenities, and transit-oriented development.

Policies
4) Encourage higher densities and mixed-use development in the vicinity of major rail and transit stops.

2.2 Greenhouse Gas Regulatory Setting

2.2.1 International
Many countries around the globe have made an effort to reduce GHGs since climate change is a global issue.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In 1988, the United Nations and the World Meteorological Organization established the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to assess the scientific, technical and socio-economic information relevant to understanding the scientific basis of risk of humaninduced climate change, its potential impacts, and options for adaptation and mitigation.

Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Regulatory Framework and Background 12 United Nations. The United States participates in the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (signed on March 21, 1994). Under the Convention, governments gather and share information on greenhouse gas emissions, national policies, and best practices; launch national strategies for addressing greenhouse gas emissions and adapting to expected impacts, including the provision of financial and technological support to developing countries; and cooperate in preparing for adaptation to the impacts of climate change.

The 2014 UN Climate Change Conference in Lima Peru provided a unique opportunity to engage all countries to assess how developed countries are implementing actions to reduce emissions.

Kyoto Protocol. The Kyoto Protocol is a treaty made under the UNFCCC and was the first international agreement to regulate GHG emissions. It has been estimated that if the commitments outlined in the Kyoto Protocol are met, global GHG emissions could be reduced by an estimated 5 percent from 1990 levels during the first commitment period of 2008 – 2012 (UNFCCC 1997). On December 8, 2012, the Doha Amendment to the Kyoto Protocol was adopted. The amendment includes: New commitments for Annex I Parties to the Kyoto Protocol who agreed to take on commitments in a second commitment period from 2013 – 2020; a revised list of greenhouse gases (GHG) to be reported on by Parties in the second commitment period; and Amendments to several articles of the Kyoto Protocol which specifically referenced issues pertaining to the first commitment period and which needed to be updated for the second commitment period.

2.2.2 National
Greenhouse Gas Endangerment. On December 2, 2009, the EPA announced that GHGs threaten the public health and welfare of the American people. The EPA also states that GHG emissions from on-road vehicles contribute to that threat. The decision was based on Massachusetts v. EPA (Supreme Court Case 05-1120) which argued that GHGs are air pollutants covered by the Clean Air Act and that the EPA has authority to regulate those emissions.

Clean Vehicles. Congress first passed the Corporate Average Fuel Economy law in 1975 to increase the fuel economy of cars and light duty trucks. The law has become more stringent over time. On May 19, 2009, President Obama put in motion a new national policy to increase fuel economy for all new cars and trucks sold in the United States. On April 1, 2010, the EPA and the Department of Transportation’s National Highway Safety Administration announced a joint final rule establishing a national program that would reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve fuel economy for new cars and trucks sold in the United States.

The first phase of the national program would apply to passenger cars, light-duty trucks, and mediumduty passenger vehicles, covering model years 2012 through 2016. They require these vehicles to meet an estimated combined average emissions level of 250 grams of carbon dioxide per mile, equivalent to

35.5 miles per gallon if the automobile industry were to meet this carbon dioxide level solely through fuel economy improvements. Together, these standards would cut carbon dioxide emissions by an estimated 960 million metric tons and 1.8 billion barrels of oil over the lifetime of the vehicles sold under the program (model years 2012-2016). The second phase of the national program would involve Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Regulatory Framework and Background 13 proposing new fuel economy and greenhouse gas standards for model years 2017 – 2025 by September 1, 2011.

On October 25, 2010, the EPA and the U.S. Department of Transportation proposed the first national standards to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve fuel efficiency of heavy-duty trucks and buses. For combination tractors, the agencies are proposing engine and vehicle standards that begin in the 2014 model year and achieve up to a 20 percent reduction in carbon dioxide emissions and fuel consumption by the 2018 model year. For heavy-duty pickup trucks and vans, the agencies are proposing separate gasoline and diesel truck standards, which phase in starting in the 2014 model year and achieve up to a 10 percent reduction for gasoline vehicles and 15 percent reduction for diesel vehicles by 2018 model year (12 and 17 percent respectively if accounting for air conditioning leakage). Lastly, for vocational vehicles, the agencies are proposing engine and vehicle standards starting in the 2014 model year which would achieve up to a 10 percent reduction in fuel consumption and carbon dioxide emissions by 2018 model year.

Issued by NHTSA and EPA in March 2020 (published on April 30, 2020 and effective after June 29, 2020), the Safer Affordable Fuel-Efficient Vehicles Rule would maintain the CAFE and CO2 standards applicable in model year 2020 for model years 2021 through 2026. The estimated CAFE and CO2 standards for model year 2020 are 43.7 mpg and 204 grams of CO2 per mile for passenger cars and 31.3 mpg and 284 grams of CO2 per mile for light trucks, projecting an overall industry average of 37 mpg, as compared to

46.7 mpg under the standards issued in 2012. This Rule also excludes CO2- equivalent emission improvements associated with air conditioning refrigerants and leakage (and, optionally, offsets for nitrous oxide and methane emissions) after model year 2020.1 Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases. On January 1, 2010, the EPA started requiring large emitters of heat-trapping emissions to begin collecting GHG data under a new reporting system. Under the rule, suppliers of fossil fuels or industrial greenhouse gases, manufacturers of vehicles and engines, and facilities that emit 25,000 metric tons or more per year of greenhouse gas emissions are required to submit annual reports to the EPA.

Climate Adaption Plan. The EPA Plan identifies priority actions the Agency will take to incorporate considerations of climate change into its programs, policies, rules and operations to ensure they are effective under future climatic conditions. The following link provides more information on the EPA Plan:
https://www.epa.gov/arc-x/planning-climate-change-adaptation

2.2.3 California
California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 24, Part 6. CCR Title 24, Part 6: California’s Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings (Title 24) were first established in 1978 in 1 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2018. Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 165 / Friday, August 24, 2018 / Proposed Rules, The Safer Affordable Fuel-Efficient (SAFE) Vehicles Rule for Model Years 2021–2026 Passenger Cars and Light Trucks 2018. Available at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2018-08-24/pdf/2018-16820.pdf.

Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Regulatory Framework and Background 14 response to a legislative mandate to reduce California’s energy consumption. The standards are updated periodically to allow consideration and possible incorporation of new energy efficiency technologies and methods. Although it was not originally intended to reduce GHG emissions, electricity production by fossil fuels results in GHG emissions and energy efficient buildings require less electricity. Therefore, increased energy efficiency results in decreased GHG emissions.

The Energy Commission adopted 2008 Standards on April 23, 2008 and Building Standards Commission approved them for publication on September 11, 2008. These updates became effective on August 1, 2009. 2013, 2016, and 2019 standards have been approved and became effective July 1, 2014, January 1, 2016, and January 1, 2020, respectively.

California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 24, Part 11. All buildings for which an application for a building permit is submitted on or after January 1, 2020 must follow the 2019 standards. Energy efficient buildings require less electricity; therefore, increased energy efficiency reduces fossil fuel consumption and decreases greenhouse gas emissions. The following links provide more information on Title 24, Part 11:
https://www.dgs.ca.gov/BSC/Codes
https://www.energy.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2020-03/Title_24_2019_Building_Standards_FAQ_ada.pdf California Green Building Standards On January 12, 2010, the State Building Standards Commission unanimously adopted updates to the California Green Building Standards Code, which went into effect on January 1, 2011. The Housing and Community Development (HCD) updated CALGreen through the 2015 Triennial Code Adoption Cycle, during the 2016 to 2017 fiscal year. During the 2019-2020 fiscal year, the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) updated CALGreen through the 2019 Triennial Code Adoption Cycle.

The Code is a comprehensive and uniform regulatory code for all residential, commercial and school buildings. CCR Title 24, Part 11: California Green Building Standards (Title 24) became effective in 2001 in response to continued efforts to reduce GHG emissions associated with energy consumption. CCR Title 24, Part 11 now require that new buildings reduce water consumption, employ building commissioning to increase building system efficiencies, divert construction waste from landfills, and install low pollutant-emitting finish materials. One focus of CCR Title 24, Part 11 is water conservation measures, which reduce GHG emissions by reducing electrical consumption associated with pumping and treating water. CCR Title 24, Part 11 has approximately 52 nonresidential mandatory measures and an additional 130 provisions for optional use. Some key mandatory measures for commercial occupancies include specified parking for clean air vehicles, a 20 percent reduction of potable water use within buildings, a 50 percent construction waste diversion from landfills, use of building finish materials that emit low levels of volatile organic compounds, and commissioning for new, nonresidential buildings over 10,000 square feet.

The 2019 CalGreen Code includes the following changes and/or additional regulations:

Single-family homes built with the 2019 standards will use about 7 percent less energy due to energy efficiency measures versus those built under the 2016 standards. Once rooftop solar electricity Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Regulatory Framework and Background 15 generation is factored in, homes built under the 2019 standards will use about 53 percent less energy than those under the 2016 standards. Nonresidential buildings will use about 30 percent less energy due mainly to lighting upgrades2.

HCD modified the best management practices for stormwater pollution prevention adding Section

5.106.2 for projects that disturb one or more acres of land. This section requires projects that disturb one acre or more of land or less than one acre of land but are part of a larger common plan of development or sale must comply with the post-construction requirement detailed in the applicable National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Construction and Land Disturbance Activities issued by the State Water Resources Control Board. The NPDES permits require post-construction runoff (post-project hydrology) to match the preconstruction runoff pre-project hydrology) with installation of post-construction stormwater management measures.

HCD added sections 5.106.4.1.3 and 5.106.4.1.5 in regards to bicycle parking. Section 5.106.4.1.3 requires new buildings with tenant spaces that have 10 or more tenant-occupants, provide secure bicycle parking for 5 percent of the tenant-occupant vehicular parking spaces with a minimum of one bicycle parking facility. In addition, Section 5.106.4.1.5 states that acceptable bicycle parking facility for Sections 5.106.4.1.2 through 5.106.4.1.4 shall be convenient from the street and shall meeting one of the following: (1) covered, lockable enclosures with permanently anchored racks for bicycles; (2) lockable bicycle rooms with permanently anchored racks; or (3) lockable, permanently anchored bicycle lockers.

HCD amended section 5.106.5.3.5 allowing future charging spaces to qualify as designated parking for clean air vehicles.

HCD updated section 5.303.3.3 in regards to showerhead flow rates. This update reduced the flow rate to 1.8 GPM.

HCD amended section 5.304.1 for outdoor potable water use in landscape areas and repealed sections

5.304.2 and 5.304.3. The update requires nonresidential developments to comply with a local water efficient landscape ordinance or the current California Department of Water Resource’s’ Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO), whichever is more stringent. Some updates were also made in regards to the outdoor potable water use in landscape areas for public schools and community colleges.

HCD updated Section 5.504.5.3 in regards to the use of MERV filters in mechanically ventilated buildings.

This update changed the filter use from MERV 8 to MERV 13. 2 https://ww2.energy.ca.gov/title24/2019standards/documents/2018_Title_24_2019_Building_Standards_FAQ.pdf Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Regulatory Framework and Background 16 The California Green Building Standards Code does not prevent a local jurisdiction from adopting a more stringent code as state law provides methods for local enhancements. The Code recognizes that many jurisdictions have developed existing construction and demolition ordinances, and defers to them as the ruling guidance provided they provide a minimum 50-percent diversion requirement. The code also provides exemptions for areas not served by construction and demolition recycling infrastructure. State building code provides the minimum standard that buildings need to meet in order to be certified for occupancy. Enforcement is generally through the local building official. The following link provides more on CalGreen Building Standards:
http://www.bsc.ca.gov/Home/CALGreen.aspx
Executive Order S-3-05. California Governor issued Executive Order S-3-05, GHG Emission, in June 2005, which established the following targets:
• By 2010, California shall reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 2000 levels; • By 2020, California shall reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels. • By 2050, California shall reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels.

The executive order directed the secretary of the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) to coordinate a multi-agency effort to reduce GHG emissions to the target levels. To comply with the Executive Order, the secretary of CalEPA created the California Climate Action Team (CAT), made up of members from various state agencies and commissions. The team released its first report in March 2006. The report proposed to achieve the targets by building on the voluntary actions of businesses, local governments, and communities and through State incentive and regulatory programs.

Executive Order S-01-07. Executive Order S-1-07 was issued in 2007 and proclaims that the transportation sector is the main source of GHG emissions in the State, since it generates more than 40 percent of the State’s GHG emissions. It establishes a goal to reduce the carbon intensity of transportation fuels sold in the State by at least ten percent by 2020. This Order also directs CARB to determine whether this Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) could be adopted as a discrete early-action measure as part of the effort to meet the mandates in AB 32.

On April 23, 2009 CARB approved the proposed regulation to implement the low carbon fuel standard and began implementation on January 1, 2011. The low carbon fuel standard is anticipated to reduce GHG emissions by about 16 MMT per year by 2020. CARB approved some amendments to the LCFS in December 2011, which were implemented on January 1, 2013. In September 2015, the Board approved the re-adoption of the LCFS, which became effective on January 1, 2016, to address procedural deficiencies in the way the original regulation was adopted. In 2018, the Board approved amendments to the regulation, which included strengthening and smoothing the carbon intensity benchmarks through 2030 in-line with California's 2030 GHG emission reduction target enacted through SB 32, adding new crediting opportunities to promote zero emission vehicle adoption, alternative jet fuel, carbon capture and sequestration, and advanced technologies to achieve deep decarbonization in the transportation sector.

Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Regulatory Framework and Background 17 The LCFS is designed to encourage the use of cleaner low-carbon transportation fuels in California, encourage the production of those fuels, and therefore, reduce GHG emissions and decrease petroleum dependence in the transportation sector. Separate standards are established for gasoline and diesel fuels and the alternative fuels that can replace each. The standards are “back-loaded”, with more reductions required in the last five years, than the first five years. This schedule allows for the development of advanced fuels that are lower in carbon than today’s fuels and the market penetration of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles, battery electric vehicles, fuel cell vehicles, and flexible fuel vehicles. It is anticipated that compliance with the low carbon fuel standard will be based on a combination of both lower carbon fuels and more efficient vehicles.

Reformulated gasoline mixed with corn-derived ethanol at ten percent by volume and low sulfur diesel fuel represent the baseline fuels. Lower carbon fuels may be ethanol, biodiesel, renewable diesel, or blends of these fuels with gasoline or diesel as appropriate. Compressed natural gas and liquefied natural gas also may be low carbon fuels. Hydrogen and electricity, when used in fuel cells or electric vehicles are also considered as low carbon fuels for the low carbon fuel standard.

SB 97. Senate Bill 97 (SB 97) was adopted August 2007 and acknowledges that climate change is a prominent environmental issue that requires analysis under CEQA. SB 97 directed the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR), which is part of the State Resource Agency, to prepare, develop, and transmit to CARB guidelines for the feasible mitigation of GHG emissions or the effects of GHG emissions, as required by CEQA, by July 1, 2009. The Resources Agency was required to certify and adopt those guidelines by January 1, 2010.

Pursuant to the requirements of SB 97 as stated above, on December 30, 2009 the Natural Resources Agency adopted amendments to the state CEQA guidelines that address GHG emissions. The CEQA Guidelines Amendments changed 14 sections of the CEQA Guidelines and incorporate GHG language throughout the Guidelines. However, no GHG emissions thresholds of significance are provided and no specific mitigation measures are identified. The GHG emission reduction amendments went into effect on March 18, 2010 and are summarized below:
• Climate action plans and other greenhouse gas reduction plans can be used to determine whether a project has significant impacts, based upon its compliance with the plan. • Local governments are encouraged to quantify the greenhouse gas emissions of proposed projects, noting that they have the freedom to select the models and methodologies that best meet their needs and circumstances. The section also recommends consideration of several qualitative factors that may be used in the determination of significance, such as the extent to which the given project complies with state, regional, or local GHG reduction plans and policies. OPR does not set or dictate specific thresholds of significance. Consistent with existing CEQA Guidelines, OPR encourages local governments to develop and publish their own thresholds of significance for GHG impacts assessment.
• When creating their own thresholds of significance, local governments may consider the thresholds of significance adopted or recommended by other public agencies, or recommended by experts.

Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Regulatory Framework and Background 18 • New amendments include guidelines for determining methods to mitigate the effects of greenhouse gas emissions in Appendix F of the CEQA Guidelines.
• OPR is clear to state that “to qualify as mitigation, specific measures from an existing plan must be identified and incorporated into the project; general compliance with a plan, by itself, is not mitigation.”
• OPR’s emphasizes the advantages of analyzing GHG impacts on an institutional, programmatic level.

OPR therefore approves tiering of environmental analyses and highlights some benefits of such an approach.
• Environmental impact reports (EIRs) must specifically consider a project's energy use and energy efficiency potential.

AB 32. The California State Legislature enacted AB 32, the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. AB 32 requires that greenhouse gases emitted in California be reduced to 1990 levels by the year 2020. “Greenhouse gases” as defined under AB 32 include carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, and sulfur hexafluoride. ARB is the state agency charged with monitoring and regulating sources of greenhouse gases. AB 32 states the following:

Global warming poses a serious threat to the economic well-being, public health, natural resources, and the environment of California. The potential adverse impacts of global warming include the exacerbation of air quality problems, a reduction in the quality and supply of water to the state from the Sierra snowpack, a rise in sea levels resulting in the displacement of thousands of coastal businesses and residences, damage to marine ecosystems and the natural environment, and an increase in the incidences of infectious diseases, asthma, and other human health-related problems.

The ARB Board approved the 1990 greenhouse gas emissions level of 427 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (MMTCO2e) on December 6, 2007 (California Air Resources Board 2007). Therefore, emissions generated in California in 2020 are required to be equal to or less than 427 MMTCO2e.

Emissions in 2020 in a “business as usual” scenario are estimated to be 596 MMTCO2e.

Under AB 32, the ARB published its Final Expanded List of Early Action Measures to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions in California. Discrete early action measures are currently underway or are enforceable by January 1, 2010. The ARB has 44 early action measures that apply to the transportation, commercial, forestry, agriculture, cement, oil and gas, fire suppression, fuels, education, energy efficiency, electricity, and waste sectors. Of these early action measures, nine are considered discrete early action measures, as they are regulatory and enforceable by January 1, 2010. The ARB estimates that the 44 recommendations are expected to result in reductions of at least 42 MMTCO2e by 2020, representing approximately 25 percent of the 2020 target.

The ARB’s Climate Change Scoping Plan (Scoping Plan) contains measures designed to reduce the State’s emissions to 1990 levels by the year 2020 (California Air Resources Board 2008). The Scoping Plan identifies recommended measures for multiple greenhouse gas emission sectors and the associated emission reductions needed to achieve the year 2020 emissions target—each sector has a different emission reduction target. Most of the measures target the transportation and electricity sectors. As stated in the Scoping Plan, the key elements of the strategy for achieving the 2020 greenhouse gas target include:

Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Regulatory Framework and Background 19 • Expanding and strengthening existing energy efficiency programs as well as building and appliance standards;
• Achieving a statewide renewables energy mix of 33 percent; • Developing a California cap-and-trade program that links with other Western Climate Initiative partner programs to create a regional market system;
• Establishing targets for transportation-related greenhouse gas emissions for regions throughout California and pursuing policies and incentives to achieve those targets; • Adopting and implementing measures pursuant to existing State laws and policies, Including California’s clean car standards, goods movement measures, and the Low Carbon Fuel Standard; and • Creating targeted fees, including a public goods charge on water use, fees on high global warming potential gases, and a fee to fund the administrative costs of the State’s long-term commitment to AB 32 implementation.

In addition, the Scoping Plan differentiates between “capped” and “uncapped” strategies. “Capped” strategies are subject to the proposed cap-and-trade program. The Scoping Plan states that the inclusion of these emissions within the cap-and trade program will help ensure that the year 2020 emission targets are met despite some degree of uncertainty in the emission reduction estimates for any individual measure. Implementation of the capped strategies is calculated to achieve a sufficient amount of reductions by 2020 to achieve the emission target contained in AB 32. “Uncapped” strategies that will not be subject to the cap-and-trade emissions caps and requirements are provided as a margin of safety by accounting for additional greenhouse gas emission reductions.4 Senate Bill 100. Senate Bill 100 (SB 100) requires 100 percent of total retail sales of electricity in California to come from eligible renewable energy resources and zero-carbon resources by December 31, 2045. SB 100 was adopted September 2018.

The interim thresholds from prior Senate Bills and Executive Orders would also remain in effect. These include Senate Bill 1078 (SB 1078), which requires retail sellers of electricity, including investor-owned utilities and community choice aggregators, to provide at least 20 percent of their supply from renewable sources by 2017. Senate Bill 107 (SB 107) which changed the target date to 2010. Executive Order S-14- 08, which was signed on November 2008 and expanded the State’s Renewable Energy Standard to 33 percent renewable energy by 2020. Executive Order S-21-09 directed the CARB to adopt regulations by July 31, 2010 to enforce S-14-08. Senate Bill X1-2 codifies the 33 percent renewable energy requirement by 2020.

SB 375. Senate Bill 375 (SB 375) was adopted September 2008 and aligns regional transportation planning efforts, regional GHG emission reduction targets, and land use and housing allocation. SB 375 requires Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO) to adopt a sustainable communities strategy (SCS) or alternate planning strategy (APS) that will prescribe land use allocation in that MPOs Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). CARB, in consultation with each MPO, will provide each affected region with reduction targets for GHGs emitted by passenger cars and light trucks in the region for the years 2020 and 2035. These reduction targets will be updated every eight years but can be updated every four years Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Regulatory Framework and Background 20 if advancements in emissions technologies affect the reduction strategies to achieve the targets. CARB is also charged with reviewing each MPO’s sustainable communities strategy or alternate planning strategy for consistency with its assigned targets.

The proposed project is located within the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), which has authority to develop the SCS or APS. For the SCAG region, the targets set by CARB are at eight percent below 2005 per capita GHG emissions levels by 2020 and 13 percent below 2005 per capita GHG emissions levels by 2035. On April 4, 2012, SCAG adopted the 2012-2035 Regional Transportation Plan / Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS), which meets the CARB emission reduction requirements.

On September 3, 2020, SCAG’s Regional Council approved and fully adopted the Connect SoCal (2020– 2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy), and the addendum to the Connect SoCal Program Environmental Impact Report. Connect SoCal is a long-range visioning plan that builds upon and expands land use and transportation strategies established over several planning cycles to increase mobility options and achieve a more sustainable growth pattern. Connect SoCal outlines more than $638 billion in transportation system investments through 2045. Connect SoCal is supported by a combination of transportation and land use strategies that help the region achieve state greenhouse gas emission reduction goals and federal Clean Air Act requirements, preserve open space areas, improve public health and roadway safety, support our vital goods movement industry and utilize resources more efficiently. By integrating the Forecasted Development Pattern with a suite of financially constrained transportation investments, Connect SoCal can reach the regional target of reducing greenhouse gases, or GHGs, from autos and light-duty trucks by 8 percent per capita by 2020, and 19 percent by 2035 (compared to 2005 levels).

City and County land use policies, including General Plans, are not required to be consistent with the RTP and associated SCS or APS. However, new provisions of CEQA would incentivize, through streamlining and other provisions, qualified projects that are consistent with an approved SCS or APS and categorized as “transit priority projects.”
Assembly Bill 939, Assembly Bill 341, and Senate Bill 1374. Assembly Bill 939 (AB 939) requires that each jurisdiction in California to divert at least 50 percent of its waste away from landfills, whether through waste reduction, recycling or other means. AB 341 requires at least 75 percent of generated waste be source reduced, recycled, or composted by the year 2020. Senate Bill 1374 (SB 1374) requires the California Integrated Waste Management Board to adopt a model ordinance by March 1, 2004 suitable for adoption by any local agency to require 50 to 75 percent diversion of construction and demolition of waste materials from landfills.

Executive Order S-13-08. Executive Order S-13-08 indicates that “climate change in California during the next century is expected to shift precipitation patterns, accelerate sea level rise and increase temperatures, thereby posing a serious threat to California’s economy, to the health and welfare of its population and to its natural resources.” Pursuant to the requirements in the order, the 2009 California Climate Adaptation Strategy (California Natural Resource Agency 2009) was adopted, which is the “… first statewide, multi-sector, region-specific, and information-based climate change in California, Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Regulatory Framework and Background 21 identifying and exploring strategies to adapt to climate change, and specifying a direction for future research.

Executive Order B-30-15. Executive Order B-30-15, establishing a new interim statewide greenhouse gas emission reduction target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030, was signed by Governor Brown in April 2015.

Executive Order B-29-15. Executive Order B-29-15, mandates a statewide 25% reduction in potable water usage and was signed into law on April 1, 2015.

Executive Order B-37-16. Executive Order B-37-16, continuing the State’s adopted water reduction, was signed into law on May 9, 2016. The water reduction builds off the mandatory 25% reduction called for in EO B-29-15.

Executive Order N-79-20. Executive Order N-79-20 was signed into law on September 23, 2020 and mandates 100 percent of in-state sales of new passenger cars and trucks be zero-emission by 2035; 100 percent of medium- and heavy-duty vehicles in the state be zero-emission vehicles by 2045 for all operations where feasible and by 2035 for drayage trucks; and to transition to 100 percent zero-emission off-road vehicles and equipment by 2035 where feasible.

The Project is within the South Coast Air Basin, which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). SCAQMD Regulation XXVII currently includes three rules:
• The purpose of Rule 2700 is to define terms and post global warming potentials. • The purpose of Rule 2701, SoCal Climate Solutions Exchange, is to establish a voluntary program to encourage, quantify, and certify voluntary, high quality certified greenhouse gas emission reductions in the SCAQMD.
• Rule 2702, Greenhouse Gas Reduction Program, was adopted on February 6, 2009. The purpose of this rule is to create a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Program for greenhouse gas emission reductions in the SCAQMD. The SCAQMD will fund projects through contracts in response to requests for proposals or purchase reductions from other parties.

SCAQMD Threshold Development
The SCAQMD has established recommended significance thresholds for greenhouse gases for local lead agency consideration (“SCAQMD draft local agency threshold”). SCAQMD has published a five-tiered draft GHG threshold which includes a 10,000 metric ton of CO2e per yearfor stationary/industrial sources and 3,000 metric tons of CO2e per year significance threshold for residential/commercial projects (South Coast Air Quality Management District 2010c). Tier 3 is anticipated to be the primary tier by which the SCAQMD will determine significance for projects. The Tier 3 screening level for stationary sources is based on an emission capture rate of 90 percent for all new or modified projects. A 90-precent emission capture rate means that 90 percent of total emissions from all new or modified stationary source projects would be subject to CEQA analysis. The 90-percent capture rate GHG significance screening level in Tier 3 for stationary sources was derived using the SCAQMD’s annual Emissions Reporting Program.

Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Regulatory Framework and Background 22 The current draft thresholds consist of the following tiered approach:
• Tier 1 consists of evaluating whether or not the project qualifies for any applicable exemption under CEQA.
• Tier 2 consists of determining whether or not the project is consistent with a greenhouse gas reduction plan. If a project is consistent with a qualifying local greenhouse gas reduction plan, it does not have significant greenhouse gas emissions.
• Tier 3 consists of screening values, which the lead agency can choose but must be consistent. A project’s construction emissions are averaged over 30 years and are added to a project’s operational emissions. If a project’s emissions are under one of the following screening thresholds, then the project is less than significant:
- All land use types: 3,000 MTCO2e per year
- Based on land use types: residential is 3,500 MTCO2e per year; commercial is 1,400 MTCO2e per year; and mixed use is 3,000 MTCO2e per year
• Tier 4 has the following options:
- Option 1: Reduce emissions from business as usual by a certain percentage; this percentage is currently undefined
- Option 2: Early implementation of applicable AB 32 Scoping Plan measures - Option 3: Year 2020 target for service populations (SP), which includes residents and employees:

4.8 MTCO2e/SP/year for projects and 6.6 MTCO2e/SP/year for plans; - Option 3, 2035 target: 3.0 MTCO2e/SP/year for projects and 4.1 MTCO2e/SP/year for plans • Tier 5 involves mitigation offsets to achieve target significance threshold.

2.2.5 Local
City of Anaheim
Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan
The City of Anaheim’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan: Sustainable Electric & Water Initiatives (GHG Reduction Plan), approved on July 21, 2015, identifies reduction targets for years 2020 and 2030 to be achieved by the Anaheim Public Utilities Department (APUD). The 2020 reduction target for GHG emissions from power generation is 20 percent below 1990 levels and 40 percent below 1990 levels for the 2030 reduction target. To meet these emissions targets, the GHG Reduction Plan also identifies renewables portfolio targets of increasing the APUD power supply generated from renewable sources up to 33 percent by year 2020 and 40 to 50 percent by year 2030. The GHG Reduction Plan also establishes transportation related goals for APUD to convert its fleet vehicles to consist of 10 percent low to zero emissions vehicles by year 2020 and up to 20 percent by year 2030.

Therefore, to determine whether the project's GHG emissions are significant, this analysis initially uses the SCAQMD draft local agency tier 3 screening threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e and then interpolated tier 4 thresholds using the 2020 and 2035 Tier 4 SCAQMD Service Population thresholds.

Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Regulatory Framework and Background 23 The project will be subject to the latest requirements of the California Green Building and Title 24 Energy Efficiency Standards (currently 2019) which would reduce project-related greenhouse gas emissions.

2.3 Energy Regulatory Setting
Federal and state agencies regulate energy use and consumption through various means and programs.

On the federal level, the United States Department of Transportation, the United States Department of Energy, and the United States Environmental Protection Agency are three federal agencies with substantial influence over energy policies and programs. On the state level, the PUC and the California Energy Commissions (CEC) are two agencies with authority over different aspects of energy. Relevant federal and state energy‐related laws and plans are summarized below.

2.3.1 Federal Regulations
Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) Standards
First established by the U.S. Congress in 1975, the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards reduce energy consumption by increasing the fuel economy of cars and light trucks. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) jointly administer the CAFE standards. The U.S. Congress has specified that CAFE standards must be set at the “maximum feasible level” with consideration given for: (1) technological feasibility; (2) economic practicality; (3) effect of other standards on fuel economy; and (4) need for the nation to conserve energy.3
Issued by NHTSA and EPA in March 2020 (published on April 30, 2020 and effective after June 29, 2020), the Safer Affordable Fuel-Efficient Vehicles Rule would maintain the CAFE and CO2 standards applicable in model year 2020 for model years 2021 through 2026. The estimated CAFE and CO2 standards for model year 2020 are 43.7 mpg and 204 grams of CO2 per mile for passenger cars and 31.3 mpg and 284 grams of CO2 per mile for light trucks, projecting an overall industry average of 37 mpg, as compared to

46.7 mpg under the standards issued in 2012.4
3 https://www.nhtsa.gov/lawsregulations/corporate-average-fuel-economy. 4 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2018. Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 165 / Friday, August 24, 2018 / Proposed Rules, The Safer Affordable Fuel-Efficient (SAFE) Vehicles Rule for Model Years 2021–2026 Passenger Cars and Light Trucks 2018. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/regulations-emissions-vehicles-and-engines/safer-affordable-fuel-efficient-safe-vehicles-final-rule.

Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Regulatory Framework and Background 24 Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA) The Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA) promoted the development of inter‐modal transportation systems to maximize mobility as well as address national and local interests in air quality and energy. ISTEA contained factors that Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) were to address in developing transportation plans and programs, including some energy‐related factors. To meet the new ISTEA requirements, MPOs adopted explicit policies defining the social, economic, energy, and environmental values guiding transportation decisions.

The Transportation Equity Act of the 21st Century (TEA-21) The Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA‐21) was signed into law in 1998 and builds upon the initiatives established in the ISTEA legislation, discussed above. TEA‐21 authorizes highway, highway safety, transit, and other efficient surface transportation programs. TEA‐21 continues the program structure established for highways and transit under ISTEA, such as flexibility in the use of funds, emphasis on measures to improve the environment, and focus on a strong planning process as the foundation of good transportation decisions. TEA‐21 also provides for investment in research and its application to maximize the performance of the transportation system through, for example, deployment of Intelligent Transportation Systems, to help improve operations and management of transportation systems and vehicle safety.

2.3.2 State Regulations
Integrated Energy Policy Report (IEPR)
Senate Bill 1389 requires the California Energy Commission (CEC) to prepare a biennial integrated energy policy report that assesses major energy trends and issues facing the State’s electricity, natural gas, and transportation fuel sectors and provides policy recommendations to conserve resources; protect the environment; ensure reliable, secure, and diverse energy supplies; enhance the state’s economy; and protect public health and safety. The Energy Commission prepares these assessments and associated policy recommendations every two years, with updates in alternate years, as part of the Integrated Energy Policy Report.

The 2019 Integrated Energy Policy Report (2019 IEPR) was adopted February 20, 2020, and continues to work towards improving electricity, natural gas, and transportation fuel energy use in California. The 2019 IEPR focuses on a variety of topics such as decarbonizing buildings, integrating renewables, energy efficiency, energy equity, integrating renewable energy, updates on Southern California electricity reliability, climate adaptation activities for the energy sector, natural gas assessment, transportation energy demand forecast, and the California Energy Demand Forecast.5 5 California Energy Commission. Final 2019 Integrated Energy Policy Report. February 20, 2020. https://www.energy.ca.gov/data-reports/reports/integratedenergy-policy-report/2019-integrated-energy-policy-report Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Regulatory Framework and Background 25 The 2020 IEPR was adopted March 23, 2021 and identifies actions the state and others can take to ensure a clean. Affordable, and reliable energy system. In 2020, the IEPR focuses on California’s transportation future and the transition to zero-emission vehicles, examines microgrids, lessons learned form a decade of state-supported research, and stakeholder feedback on the potential of microgrids to contribute to a lean and resilient energy system; and reports on California’s energy demand outlook, updated to reflect the global pandemic and help plan for a growth in zero-emission plug in electric vehicles.6 State of California Energy Plan
The CEC is responsible for preparing the State Energy Plan, which identifies emerging trends related to energy supply, demand, conservation, public health and safety, and the maintenance of a healthy economy. The Plan calls for the state to assist in the transformation of the transportation system to improve air quality, reduce congestion, and increase the efficient use of fuel supplies with the least environmental and energy costs. To further this policy, the plan identifies a number of strategies, including assistance to public agencies and fleet operators and encouragement of urban designs that reduce vehicle miles traveled and accommodate pedestrian and bicycle access.

California Building Standards Code (Title 24)
California Building Energy Efficiency Standards (Title 24, Part 6) The California Building Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings (California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 6) were adopted to ensure that building construction and system design and installation achieve energy efficiency and preserve outdoor and indoor environmental quality. The current California Building Energy Efficiency Standards (Title 24 standards) are the 2019 Title 24 standards, which became effective on January 1, 2020. The 2019 Title 24 standards include efficiency improvements to the lighting and efficiency improvements to the non-residential standards include alignment with the American Society of Heating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.

All buildings for which an application for a building permit is submitted on or after January 1, 2020 must follow the 2019 standards. The 2016 residential standards were estimated to be approximately 28 percent more efficient than the 2013 standards, whereas the 2019 residential standards are estimated to be approximately 7 percent more efficient than the 2016 standards. Furthermore, once rooftop solar electricity generation is factored in, 2019 residential standards are estimated to be approximately 53 percent more efficient than the 2016 standards. Under the 2019 standards, nonresidential buildings are estimated to be approximately 30 percent more efficient than the 2016 standards. Energy efficient buildings require less electricity; therefore, increased energy efficiency reduces fossil fuel consumption and decreases greenhouse gas emissions.
6 California Energy Commission. Final 2020 Integrated Energy Policy Report. March 23, 2020. https://www.energy.ca.gov/data-reports/reports/integratedenergy-policy-report/2020-integrated-energy-policy-report-update Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Regulatory Framework and Background 26 California Building Energy Efficiency Standards (Title 24, Part 11) The 2019 California Green Building Standards Code (California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 11), commonly referred to as the CALGreen Code, went into effect on January 1, 2020. The 2019 CALGreen Code includes mandatory measures for non-residential development related to site development; energy efficiency; water efficiency and conservation; material conservation and resource efficiency; and environmental quality.

The Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) updated CALGreen through the 2019 Triennial Code Adoption Cycle. HCD modified the best management practices for stormwater pollution prevention adding Section 5.106.2; added sections 5.106.4.1.3 and 5.106.4.1.5 in regard to bicycle parking; amended section 5.106.5.3.5 allowing future charging spaces to qualify as designated parking for clean air vehicles; updated section 5.303.3.3 in regard to showerhead flow rates; amended section

5.304.1 for outdoor potable water use in landscape areas and repealed sections 5.304.2 and 5.304.3; and updated Section 5.504.5.3 in regard to the use of MERV filters in mechanically ventilated buildings.

Senate Bill 100
Senate Bill 100 (SB 100) requires 100 percent of total retail sales of electricity in California to come from eligible renewable energy resources and zero-carbon resources by December 31, 2045. SB 100 was adopted September 2018.

Senate Bill 350
Senate Bill 350 (SB 350) was signed into law October 7, 2015, SB 350 increases California’s renewable electricity procurement goal from 33 percent by 2020 to 50 percent by 2030. This will increase the use of Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS) eligible resources, including solar, wind, biomass, geothermal, and others. In addition, SB 350 requires the state to double statewide energy efficiency savings in electricity and natural gas end uses by 2030. To help ensure these goals are met and the greenhouse gas emission reductions are realized, large utilities will be required to develop and submit Integrated Resource Plans (IRPs). These IRPs will detail how each entity will meet their customers resource needs, reduce greenhouse gas emissions and ramp up the deployment of clean energy resources.

Assembly Bill 32
Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Regulatory Framework and Background 27 In 2006 the California State Legislature adopted Assembly Bill 32 (AB 32), the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. AB 32 requires CARB, to adopt rules and regulations that would achieve GHG emissions equivalent to statewide levels in 1990 by 2020 through an enforceable statewide emission cap which will be phased in starting in 2012. Emission reductions shall include carbon sequestration projects that would remove carbon from the atmosphere and best management practices that are technologically feasible and cost effective.

Assembly Bill 1493/Pavley Regulations
California Assembly Bill 1493 enacted on July 22, 2002, required CARB to develop and adopt regulations that reduce GHGs emitted by passenger vehicles and light duty trucks. In 2005, the CARB submitted a “waiver” request to the EPA from a portion of the federal Clean Air Act in order to allow the State to set more stringent tailpipe emission standards for CO2 and other GHG emissions from passenger vehicles and light duty trucks. On December 19, 2007 the EPA announced that it denied the “waiver” request. On January 21, 2009, CARB submitted a letter to the EPA administrator regarding the State’s request to reconsider the waiver denial. The EPA approved the waiver on June 30, 2009.

Executive Order S-1-07/Low Carbon Fuel Standard
Executive Order S-1-07 was issued in 2007 and proclaims that the transportation sector is the main source of GHG emissions in the State, since it generates more than 40 percent of the State’s GHG emissions. It establishes a goal to reduce the carbon intensity of transportation fuels sold in the State by at least ten percent by 2020. This Order also directs CARB to determine whether this Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) could be adopted as a discrete early-action measure as part of the effort to meet the mandates in AB 32.

The LCFS is designed to encourage the use of cleaner low-carbon transportation fuels in California, encourage the production of those fuels, and therefore, reduce GHG emissions and decrease petroleum dependence in the transportation sector. Separate standards are established for gasoline and diesel fuels and the alternative fuels that can replace each. The standards are “back-loaded”, with more reductions required in the last five years, than during the first five years. This schedule allows for the development of advanced fuels that are lower in carbon than today’s fuels and the market penetration Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Regulatory Framework and Background 28 of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles, battery electric vehicles, fuel cell vehicles, and flexible fuel vehicles. It is anticipated that compliance with the low carbon fuel standard will be based on a combination of both lower carbon fuels and more efficient vehicles.

Executive Order N-79-20.

Executive Order N-79-20 was signed into law on September 23, 2020 and mandates 100 percent of instate sales of new passenger cars and trucks be zero-emission by 2035; 100 percent of medium- and heavy-duty vehicles in the state be zero-emission vehicles by 2045 for all operations where feasible and by 2035 for drayage trucks; and to transition to 100 percent zero-emission off-road vehicles and equipment by 2035 where feasible.

California Air Resources Board
CARB’s Advanced Clean Cars Program
Closely associated with the Pavley regulations, the Advanced Clean Cars emissions control program was approved by CARB in 2012. The program combines the control of smog, soot, and GHGs with requirements for greater numbers of zero-emission vehicles for model years 2015–2025. The components of the Advanced Clean Cars program include the Low-Emission Vehicle (LEV) regulations that reduce criteria pollutants and GHG emissions from light- and medium-duty vehicles, and the ZeroEmission Vehicle (ZEV) regulation, which requires manufacturers to produce an increasing number of pure ZEVs (meaning battery electric and fuel cell electric vehicles), with provisions to also produce plugin hybrid electric vehicles (PHEV) in the 2018 through 2025 model years.7 Airborne Toxic Control Measure to Limit Diesel-Fueled Commercial Motor Vehicle Idling The Airborne Toxic Control Measure to Limit Diesel-Fueled Commercial Motor Vehicle Idling (Title 13, California Code of Regulations, Division 3, Chapter 10, Section 2435) was adopted to reduce public exposure to diesel particulate matter and other air contaminants by limiting the idling of diesel-fueled commercial motor vehicles. This section applies to diesel-fueled commercial motor vehicles with gross vehicular weight ratings of greater than 10,000 pounds that are or must be licensed for operation on 7 California Air Resources Board, California’s Advanced Clean Cars Program, January 18, 2017. www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/acc/acc.htm.

Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Regulatory Framework and Background 29 highways. Reducing idling of diesel-fueled commercial motor vehicles reduces the amount of petroleumbased fuel used by the vehicle.

Regulation to Reduce Emissions of Diesel Particulate Matter, Oxides of Nitrogen, and other Criteria Pollutants, form In-Use Heavy-Duty Diesel-Fueled Vehicles The Regulation to Reduce Emissions of Diesel Particulate Matter, Oxides of Nitrogen and other Criteria Pollutants, from In-Use Heavy-Duty Diesel-Fueled Vehicles (Title 13, California Code of Regulations, Division 3, Chapter 1, Section 2025) was adopted to reduce emissions of diesel particulate matter, oxides of nitrogen (NOX) and other criteria pollutants from in-use diesel-fueled vehicles. This regulation is phased, with full implementation by 2023. The regulation aims to reduce emissions by requiring the installation of diesel soot filters and encouraging the retirement, replacement, or repower of older, dirtier engines with newer emission-controlled models. The newer emission controlled models would use petroleum-based fuel in a more efficient manner.

Sustainable Communities Strategy
The Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act of 2008, or Senate Bill 375 (SB 375), coordinates land use planning, regional transportation plans, and funding priorities to help California meet the GHG reduction mandates established in AB 32.

Senate Bill 375 (SB 375) was adopted September 2008 and aligns regional transportation planning efforts, regional GHG emission reduction targets, and land use and housing allocation. SB 375 requires Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO) to adopt a sustainable communities strategy (SCS) or alternate planning strategy (APS) that will prescribe land use allocation in that MPOs Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). CARB, in consultation with each MPO, will provide each affected region with reduction targets for GHGs emitted by passenger cars and light trucks in the region for the years 2020 and 2035. These reduction targets will be updated every eight years but can be updated every four years if advancements in emissions technologies affect the reduction strategies to achieve the targets. CARB is also charged with reviewing each MPO’s sustainable communities strategy or alternate planning strategy for consistency with its assigned targets.

2.3.3 City Regulations
City of Anaheim General Plan
The City’s General Plan includes various policies related to reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The applicable policies to the project are listed below.

Goal 15.1
Continue to lead the County in energy conservation programs, practices and community outreach.

Policies
1) Continue to maintain and update energy conservation programs and information provided on the City’s website.

Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Regulatory Framework and Background 30 Goal 15.2
Continue to encourage site design practices that reduce and conserve energy.

Policies
1) Encourage increased use of passive and active solar design in existing and new development (e.g., orienting buildings to maximize exposure to cooling effects of prevailing winds and locating landscaping and landscape structures to shade buildings). 2) Encourage energy-efficient retrofitting of existing buildings throughout the City. 3) Continue to provide free energy audits for the public Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Setting
31 3.0 Setting

3.1 Existing Physical Setting
The project site is located in the City of Anaheim, which is part of the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) that includes all of Orange County as well as the non-desert portions of Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties. The South Coast Air Basin islocated on a coastal plain with connecting broad valleys and low hills to the east. Regionally, the South Coast Air Basin is bounded by the Pacific Ocean to the southwest and high mountains to the east forming the inland perimeter.

3.1.1 Local Climate and Meteorology
Dominant airflows provide the driving mechanism for transport and dispersion of air pollution. The mountains surrounding the region form natural horizontal barriers to the dispersion of air contaminants.

Air pollution created in the coastal areas and around the Los Angeles area is transported inland until it reaches the mountains where the combination of mountains and inversion layers generally prevent further dispersion. This poor ventilation results in a gradual degradation of air quality from the coastal areas to inland areas. Air stagnation may occur during the early evening and early morning periods of transition between day and nighttime flows. The region also experiences periods of hot, dry winds from the desert, known as Santa Ana winds. If the Santa Ana winds are strong, they can surpass the sea breeze, which blows from the ocean to the land, and carry the suspended dust and pollutants out to the ocean. If the winds are weak, they are opposed by the sea breeze and cause stagnation, resulting in high pollution events.

The annual average temperature varies little throughout much of the basin, ranging from the low to middle 60s, measured in degrees Fahrenheit (°F). With more pronounced oceanic influence, coastal areas show less variability in annual minimum and maximum temperatures than inland areas where the project site is located. The majority of the annual rainfall in the basin occurs between November and April. Summer rainfall is minimal and is generally limited to scattered thunderstorms in the coastal regions and slightly heavier showers in the eastern portion of the basin along the coastal side of the mountains. Year-to-year patterns in rainfall are unpredictable because of fluctuations in the weather.

Temperature inversions limit the vertical depth through which pollution can be mixed. Among the most common temperature inversions in the basin are radiation inversions, which form on clear winter nights when cold air off mountains sink to the valley floor while the air aloft over the valley remains warm.

These inversions, in conjunction with calm winds, trap pollutants near the source. Other types of temperature inversions that affect the basin include marine, subsidence, and high-pressure inversions.

Summers are often periods of hazy visibility and occasionally unhealthful air. Strong temperature inversions may occur that limit the vertical depth through which air pollution can be dispersed. Air pollutants concentrate because they cannot rise through the inversion layer and disperse. These inversions are more common and persistent during the summer months. Over time, sunlight produces photochemical reactions within this inversion layer that creates ozone, a particularly harmful air pollutant. Occasionally, strong thermal convections occur which allows the air pollutants to rise high Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Setting
32 enough to pass over the mountains and ultimately dilute the smog cloudtrap pollutants such as automobile exhaust near their source. While these inversions may lead to air pollution “hot spots” in heavily developed coastal areas of the basin, there is not enough traffic in inland valleys to cause any winter air pollution problems. Despite light wind conditions, especially at night and in the early morning, winter is generally a period of good air quality in the project vicinity.

In the winter, light nocturnal winds result mainly from the drainage of cool air off of the mountains toward the valley floor while the air aloft over the valley remains warm. This forms a type of inversion known as a radiation inversion. Such winds are characterized by stagnation and poor local mixing and trap pollutants such as automobile exhaust near their source. While these inversions may lead to air pollution “hot spots” in heavily developed coastal areas of the basin, there is not enough traffic to cause any winter air pollution problems. Despite light wind conditions, especially at night and in the early morning, winter is generally a period of good air quality in the project vicinity.

The temperature and precipitation levels for the City of Anaheim, closest station with data, are in Table

3. Table 3 shows that August is typically the warmest month and December is typically the coolest month.

Rainfall in the project area varies considerably in both time and space. Almost all the annual rainfall comes from the fringes of mid-latitude storms from late November to early April, with summers being almost completely dry.

Table 3: Meteorological Summary
Month
Temperature (˚F) Average Precipitation
Average High Average Low (inches)
January 70.0 47.5 3.34
February 70.0 48.2 3.47
March 72.4 50.4 1.86
April 74.7 52.8 0.83
May 77.1 57.3 0.53
June 80.1 60.5 0.15
July 85.2 64.2 0.07
August 87.1 64.5 0.01
September 86.5 62.7 0.10
October 81.2 57.7 0.72
November 75.4 51.8 0.99
December 69.7 46.9 2.02
Annual Average 77.4 55.4 14.09
Notes:
1 Source: https://wrcc.dri.edu/cgi-bin/cliMAIN.pl?ca5790

3.1.2 Local Air Quality
The SCAQMD is divided into 38 air-monitoring areas with a designated ambient air monitoring station representative of each area. The project site is located in the City of Anaheim in the Central Orange County (Area 17). The nearest air monitoring station to the project site with available data is the Anaheim-Pampas Road Station (Anaheim Station). The Anaheim Station is located approximately 3 miles Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Setting
33 southeast of the project site, at 1630 West Pampas Lane, Anaheim; however, this location does not provide all ambient weather data. Therefore, additional data was pulled from the SCAQMD historical data for the Central Orange County Area (SRA 17) for both sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide. Table 4 presents the monitored pollutant levels within the vicinity. However, it should be noted that due to the air monitoring station distance from the project site, recorded air pollution levels at the air monitoring station reflect with varying degrees of accuracy, local air quality conditions at the project site.

Table 4: Local Area Air Quality Levels
Year
Pollutant (Standard)2 2018 2019 2020
Ozone:

Maximum 1-Hour Concentration (ppm) 0.112 0.096 0.142
Days > CAAQS (0.09 ppm) 1 1 6
Maximum 8-Hour Concentration (ppm) 0.071 0.082 0.097
Days > NAAQS (0.07 ppm) 1 1 15
Days > CAAQS (0.070 ppm) 1 1 16
Carbon Monoxide:

Maximum 1-Hour Concentration (ppm) 3.0 2.6 2.1
Days > NAAQS (20 ppm) 0 0 0
Maximum 8-Hour Concentration (ppm) 1.4 1.2 1.2
Days > NAAQS (9 ppm) 0 0 0
Nitrogen Dioxide:

Maximum 1-Hour Concentration (ppm) 0.066 0.059 0.071
Days > NAAQS (0.25 ppm) 0 0 0
Sulfur Dioxide:

Maximum 1-Hour Concentration (ppm) - - -
Days > CAAQS (0.25 ppm) - - -
Inhalable Particulates (PM10):

Maximum 24-Hour Concentration (ug/m3) 94.6 127.6 74.8
Days > NAAQS (150 ug/m3) 0 0 0
Days > CAAQS (50 ug/m3) 2 4 5
Annual Average (ug/m3) 27.9 24.6 30.8
Annual > NAAQS (50 ug/m3) No No No
Annual > CAAQS (20 ug/m3) Yes Yes Yes
Ultra-Fine Particulates (PM2.5):

Maximum 24-Hour Concentration (ug/m3) 63.1 36.1 60.2
Days > NAAQS (35 ug/m3) 7 4 12
Annual Average (ug/m3) 11.4 9.3 12.2
Annual > NAAQS (15 ug/m3) No No No
Annual > CAAQS (12 ug/m3) No No Yes

1. Source: obtained from https://www.aqmd.gov/home/air-quality/air-quality-data-studies/historical-data-by-year and /or https://www.arb.ca.gov/adam/topfour/topfour1.php.
2 CAAQS = California Ambient Air Quality Standard; NAAQS = National Ambient Air Quality Standard; ppm = parts per million 3 No data available.

The monitoring data presented in Table 4 shows that ozone and particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) are the air pollutants of primary concern in the project area, which are detailed below.

Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Setting
34 Ozone
During the 2018 to 2020 monitoring period, the State 1-hour concentration standard for ozone has been exceeded between 1 and 6 days per year at the Anaheim Station. The State and Federal 8-hour ozone standard have been exceeded between 1 and 16 days per year over the past three years at the Anaheim Station.

Ozone is a secondary pollutant as it is not directly emitted. Ozone is the result of chemical reactions between other pollutants, most importantly hydrocarbons and NO2, which occur only in the presence of bright sunlight. Pollutants emitted from upwind cities react during transport downwind to produce the oxidant concentrations experienced in the area. Many areas of the SCAQMD contribute to the ozone levels experienced at the monitoring station, with the more significant areas being those directly upwind.

Carbon Monoxide
CO is another important pollutant that is due mainly to motor vehicles. The Central Orange County Area did not record an exceedance of the state or federal 1-hour or 8-hour CO standards for the last three years.

Nitrogen Dioxide
The Anaheim Station did not record an exceedance of the State or Federal NO2 standards for the last three years.

Sulfur Dioxide
The Central Orange County Area did not record an exceedance of the State SO2 standards for the last three years.

Particulate Matter
During the 2018 to 2020 monitoring period, the State 24-hour concentration standard for PM10 was not exceeded between 2 and 5 days each year at the Anaheim Station. Over the same time period, the Federal 24-hour and annual standards for PM10 has not been exceeded at the Anaheim Station.

During the 2018 to 2020 monitoring period, the Federal 24-hour standard for PM2.5 was exceeded between 7 and 12 days each year at the Anaheim Station.

According to the EPA, some people are much more sensitive than others to breathing fine particles (PM10 and PM2.5). People with influenza, chronic respiratory and cardiovascular diseases, and the elderly may suffer worsening illness and premature death due to breathing these fine particles. People with bronchitis can expect aggravated symptoms from breathing in fine particles. Children may experience decline in lung function due to breathing in PM10 and PM2.5. Other groups considered sensitive are smokers and people who cannot breathe well through their noses. Exercising athletes are also considered sensitive, because many breathe through their mouths during exercise.

Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Setting
35 3.1.3 Attainment Status
The EPA and the ARB designate air basins where ambient air quality standards are exceeded as “nonattainment” areas. If standards are met, the area is designated as an “attainment” area. If there is inadequate or inconclusive data to make a definitive attainment designation, they are considered “unclassified.” National nonattainment areas are further designated as marginal, moderate, serious, severe, or extreme as a function of deviation from standards. Each standard has a different definition, or ‘form’ of what constitutes attainment, based on specific air quality statistics. For example, the Federal 8-hour CO standard is not to be exceeded more than once per year; therefore, an area is in attainment of the CO standard if no more than one 8-hour ambient air monitoring values exceeds the threshold per year. In contrast, the federal annual PM2.5 standard is met if the three-year average of the annual average PM2.5 concentration is less than or equal to the standard. Table 5 lists the attainment status for the criteria pollutants in the basin.

Table 5: South Coast Air Basin Attainment Status
Pollutant Standard1 Averaging Time Designation2 Attainment Date3 1-Hour Ozone
NAAQS 1979 1-Hour
(0.12 ppm) Nonattainment (Extreme) 2/6/2023(not attained)4 CAAQS 1-Hour
(0.09 ppm) Nonattainment N/A
8-Hour Ozone5
NAAQS 1997 8-Hour
(0.08 ppm) Nonattainment (Extreme) 6/15/2024
NAAQS 2008 8-Hour
(0.075 ppm) Nonattainment (Extreme) 7/20/2032
NAAQS 2015 8-Hour
(0.070 ppm) Nonattainment (Extreme) 8/3/2038
CAAQS 8-Hour
(0.070 ppm) Nonattainment Beyond 2032
CO
NAAQS 1-Hour (35 ppm) Attainment (Maintenance) 6/11/2007 (attained) CAAQS 8-Hour (9 ppm) Attainment 6/11/2007 (attained)
NO2
6 NAAQS 1-Hour (0.1 ppm) Unclassifiable/Attainment N/A (attained) NAAQS Annual (0.053
ppm) Attainment (Maintenance) 9/22/1998 (attained)
CAAQS
1-hour (0.18 ppm)
Annual (0.030
ppm)
Attainment -
SO2
7 NAAQS 1-Hour (75 ppb) Designations Pending (expect
Uncl./Attainment) N/A (attained)
NAAQS
24-Hour (0.14
ppm)
Annual (0.03 ppm)
Unclassifiable/Attainment 3/19/1979 (attained)
Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Setting
36 PM10
NAAQS 1987 24-Hour
(150 µg/m3)
Attainment (Maintenance)8 7/26/2013 (attained)
CAAQS 24-Hour (50 µg/m3
)
Annual (20 µg/m3)
Nonattainment N/A
PM2.5 9
NAAQS 2006 24-Hour
(35 µg/m3)
Nonattainment (Serious) 12/31/2019
NAAQS 1997 Annual
(15.0 µg/m3) Attainment 8/24/2016
NAAQS 2021 Annual
(12.0 µg/m3) Nonattainment (Serious) 12/31/2025
CAAQS Annual
(12.0 µg/m3) Nonattainment N/A
Lead NAAQS 3-Months Rolling
(0.15 µg/m3)
Nonattainment
(Partial)10 12/31/2015
Notes:

Source: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/clean-air-plans/air-quality-management-plans/naaqs-caaqs-feb2016.pdf 1 NAAQS = National Ambient Air Quality Standards, CAAQS = California Ambient Air Quality Standards 2 U.S. EPA often only declares Nonattainment areas; everywhere else is listed as Unclassifiable/Attainment or Unclassifiable.
3 A design value below the NAAQS for data through the full year or smog season prior to the attainment date is typically required for attainment demonstration.
4 1-hour O3 standard (0.12 ppm) was revoked, effective June 15, 2005 ; however, the Basin has not attained this standard based on 2008-2010 data and is still subject to anti-backsliding requirements. 5 1997 8-hour O3 standard (0.08 ppm) was reduced (0.075 ppm), effective May 27, 2008; the revoked 1997 O3 standard is still subject to anti-backsliding requirements.
6 New NO2 1-hour standard, effective August 2, 2010; attainment designations January 20, 2012; annual NO2 standard retained.
7 The 1971 annual and 24-hour SO2 standards were revoked, effective August 23, 2010; however, these 1971 standards will remain in effect until one year after U.S. EPA promulgates area designations for the 2010 SO2 1-hour standard. Area designations are still pending, with Basin expected to be designated Unclassifiable /Attainment. 8 Annual PM10 standard was revoked, effective December 18, 2006; 24-hour PM10 NAAQS deadline was 12/31/2006; SCAQMD request for attainment redesignation and PM10 maintenance plan was approved by U.S. EPA on June 26, 2013, effective July 26, 2013.
9 Attainment deadline for the 2006 24-Hour PM2.5 NAAQS (designation effective December 14, 2009) is December 31, 2019 (end of the 10th calendar year after effective date of designations for Serious nonattainment areas). Annual PM2.5 standard was revised on January 15, 2013, effective March 18, 2013, from 15 to 12 µg/m3. Designations effective April 15, 2015, so Serious area attainment deadline is December 31, 2025. 10 Partial Nonattainment designation – Los Angeles County portion of Basin only for near-source monitors. Expect redesignation to attainment based on current monitoring data.

3.2 Greenhouse Gases
Constituent gases of the Earth’s atmosphere, called atmospheric greenhouse gases (GHG), play a critical role in the Earth’s radiation amount by trapping infrared radiation emitted from the Earth’s surface, which otherwise would have escaped to space. Prominent greenhouse gases contributing to this process include carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), ozone, water vapor, nitrous oxide (N2O), and chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). This phenomenon, known as the Greenhouse Effect, is responsible for maintaining a habitable climate. Anthropogenic (caused or produced by humans) emissions of these greenhouse gases in excess of natural ambient concentrations are responsible for the enhancement of the Greenhouse Effect and have led to a trend of unnatural warming of the Earth’s natural climate, known as global warming or climate change. Emissions of gases that induce global warming are Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Setting
37 attributable to human activities associated with industrial/manufacturing, agriculture, utilities, transportation, and residential land uses. Transportation is responsible for 41 percent of the State’s greenhouse gas emissions, followed by electricity generation. Emissions of CO2 and nitrous oxide (NO2) are byproducts of fossil fuel combustion. Methane, a potent greenhouse gas, results from off-gassing associated with agricultural practices and landfills. Sinks of CO2, where CO2 is stored outside of the atmosphere, include uptake by vegetation and dissolution into the ocean. Table 6 provides a description of each of the greenhouse gases and their global warming potential.

Additional information is available: https://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/inventory/data/data.htm <Table 6 on next page>
Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Setting
38 Table 6: Description of Greenhouse Gases
Greenhouse Gas Description and Physical Properties Sources Nitrous oxide
Nitrous oxide (N20),also known as laughing gas is a
colorless gas. It has a lifetime of 114 years. Its global warming potential is 298.

Microbial processes in soil and water,
fuel combustion, and industrial
processes. In addition to agricultural
sources, some industrial processes
(nylon production, nitric acid
production) also emit N20.

Methane
Methane (CH4) is a flammable gas and is the main
component of natural gas. It has a lifetime of 12 years.

Its global warming potential is 25.

A natural source of CH4 is from the
decay of organic matter. Methane is
extracted from geological deposits
(natural gas fields). Other sources are
from the decay of organic material in
landfills, fermentation of manure, and
cattle farming.

Carbon dioxide
Carbon dioxide (CO2) is an odorless, colorless, natural greenhouse gas. Carbon dioxide’s global warming
potential is 1. The concentration in 2005 was 379 parts per million (ppm), which is an increase of about 1.4
ppm per year since 1960.

Natural sources include decomposition
of dead organic matter; respiration of
bacteria, plants, animals, and fungus;
evaporation from oceans; and volcanic
outgassing. Anthropogenic sources are
from burning coal, oil, natural gas, and
wood.

Chlorofluorocarbons
CFCs are nontoxic, nonflammable, insoluble, and
chemically unreactive in the troposphere (the level of
air at the earth’s surface). They are gases formed
synthetically by replacing all hydrogen atoms in
methane or methane with chlorine and/or fluorine
atoms. Global warming potentials range from 3,800 to
8,100.

Chlorofluorocarbons were synthesized
in 1928 for use as refrigerants, aerosol
propellants, and cleaning solvents. They
destroy stratospheric ozone, therefore
their production was stopped as
required by the Montreal Protocol.

Hydrofluorocarbons
Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) are a group of greenhouse
gases containing carbon, chlorine, and at least one
hydrogen atom. Global warming potentials range from
140 to 11,700.

Hydrofluorocarbons are synthetic
manmade chemicals used as a
substitute for chlorofluorocarbons in
applications such as automobile air
conditioners and refrigerants.

Perfluorocarbons
Perfluorocarbons (PFCs) have stable molecular
structures and only break down by ultraviolet rays
about 60 kilometers above the Earth's surface. They
have a lifetime 10,000 to 50,000 years. They have a
global warming potential range of 6,200 to 9,500.

Two main sources of perfluorocarbons
are primary aluminum production and
semiconductor manufacturing.

Sulfur
hexafluoride
Sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) is an inorganic, odorless,
colorless, and nontoxic, nonflammable gas. It has a
lifetime of 3,200 years. It has a high global warming
potential, 23,900.

This gas is manmade and used for
insulation in electric power
transmission equipment, in the
magnesium industry, in semiconductor
manufacturing, and as a tracer gas for
leak detection.

Notes:

1. Sources: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2014a and Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2014b. https://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/ch2s2-10-2.html Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Setting
39 3.3 Energy

3.3.1 Overview
California’s estimated annual energy use as of 2019 included:
• Approximately 277,704 gigawatt hours of electricity; 8 • Approximately 2,136,907 million cubic feet of natural gas per year (for the year 2018)9;and • Approximately 23.2 billion gallons of transportation fuel (for the year 2015)10.

As of 2019, the year of most recent data currently available by the United States Energy Information Administration (EIA), energy use in California by demand sector was:
• Approximately 39.3 percent transportation;
• Approximately 23.2 percent industrial;
• Approximately 18.7 percent residential; and
• Approximately 18.9 percent commercial.11
California's electricity in-state generation system generates approximately 200,475 gigawatt-hours each year. In 2019, California produced approximately 72 percent of the electricity it uses; the rest was imported from the Pacific Northwest (approximately 9 percent) and the U.S. Southwest (approximately 19 percent). Natural gas is the main source for electricity generation at approximately 42.97 percent of the total in-state electric generation system power as shown in Table 7. <Table 7, next page>
8California Energy Commission. Energy Almanac. Total Electric Generation. [Online] 2020. https://www.energy.ca.gov/data-reports/energy-almanac/california-electricity-data/2019-total-system-electric-generation. 9Natural Gas Consumption by End Use. U.S. Energy Information Administration. [Online] August 31, 20020.https://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_cons_sum_dcu_SCA_a.htm. 10California Energy Commission. Revised Transportation Energy Demand Forecast 2018-2030. [Online] April 19, 2018. https://www.energy.ca.gov/assessments/
11U.S. Energy Information Administration. California Energy Consumption by by End-Use Sector.

California State Profile and Energy Estimates.[Online] January 16, 2020 https://www.eia.gov/state/?sid=CA#tabs-2 Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Setting
40 Table 7: Total Electricity System Power (California 2019) Fuel Type
California
In-State
Generation
(GWh)
Percent of
California
In-State
Generation
Northwest
Imports
(GWh)
Southwest
Imports
(GWh)
Total
Imports
(GWh)
Percent
of
Imports
California
Power
Mix
(GWh)
Percent
California
Power
Mix
Coal 248 0.12% 219 7,765 7,985 10.34% 8,233 2.96%
Natural Gas 86,136 42.97% 62 8,859 8,921 11.55% 95,057 34.23% Nuclear 16,163 8.06% 39 8,743 8,782 11.37% 24,945 8.98% Oil 36 0.02% 0 0 0 0.00% 36 0.01%
Other (Petroleum
Coke/Waste
Heat)
411 0.20% 0 11 11 0.01% 422 0.15%
Large Hydro 33,145 16.53% 6,387 1,071 7,458 9.66% 40,603 14.62% Unspecified
Sources of Power
0 0.00% 6,609 13,767 20,376 26.38% 20,376 7.34%
Renewables 64,336 32.09% 10,615 13,081 23,696 30.68% 88,032 31.70% Biomass 5,851 2.92% 903 33 936 1.21% 6,787 2.44%
Geothermal 10,943 5.46% 99 2,218 2,318 3.00% 13,260 4.77% Somall Hydro 5,349 2.67% 292 4 296 0.38% 5,646 2.03%
Solar 28,513 14.22% 282 5,295 5,577 7.22% 34,090 12.28% Wind 13,680 6.82% 9,038 5,531 14,569 18.87% 28,249 10.17% Total 200,475 100.00% 23,930 53,299 77,229 100.00% 277,704 100.00% Notes:
1 Source: California Energy Commission. 2019 Total System electric Generation. https://www.energy.ca.gov/data-reports/energy-almanac/californiaelectricity-data/2019-total-system-electric-generation A summary of and context for energy consumption and energy demands within the State is presented in “U.S. Energy Information Administration, California State Profile and Energy Estimates, Quick Facts” excerpted below:
• California was the seventh-largest producer of crude oil among the 50 states in 2018, and, as of January 2019, it ranked third in oil refining capacity. • California is the largest consumer of jet fuel among the 50 states and accounted for one-fifth of the nation’s jet fuel consumption in 2018.
• California’s total energy consumption is the second-highest in the nation, but, in 2018, the State’s per capita energy consumption ranked the fourth-lowest, due in part to its mild climate and its energy efficiency programs.
• In 2018, California ranked first in the nation as a producer of electricity from solar, geothermal, and biomass resources and fourth in the nation in conventional hydroelectric power generation. • In 2018, large- and small-scale solar PV and solar thermal installations provided 19% of California’s net electricity generation12.
12 State Profile and Energy Estimates. Independent Statistics and Analysis. [Online] [Cited: January 16, 2020.] http://www.eia.gov/state/?sid=CA#tabs2.

Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Setting
41 As indicated above, California is one of the nation’s leading energy‐producing states, and California per capita energy use is among the nation’s most efficient. Given the nature of the proposed project, the remainder of this discussion will focus on the three sources of energy that are most relevant to the project—namely, electricity and natural gas for building uses, and transportation fuel for vehicle trips associated with the proposed project.

3.3.2 Electricity and Natural Gas
Electricity and natural gas would be provided to the project by San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E). SDG&E provides electrical and natural gas service to the project area through State‐regulated utility contracts.

SDG&E provides electric energy service to 3.6 million people located in most of San Diego County and the southern portion of Orange County, within a service area encompassing approximately 4,100 square miles.13 The delivery of electricity involves a number of system components, including substations and transformers that lower transmission line power (voltage) to a level appropriate for on‐site distribution and use. The electricity generated is distributed through a network of transmission and distribution lines commonly called a power grid. In 2020, SDG&E provided 17,445 Gigawatt‐hours per year of electricity.14 Table 8 identifies SDG&E’s specific proportional shares of electricity sources in 2019. As shown in Table 8, the 2019 SDG&E Power Mix has renewable energy at 31.3 percent of the overall energy resources, of which biomass and waste is at 2 percent, solar energy is at 17 percent, and wind power is at 13 percent; other energy sources include natural gas at 24 percent and unspecified sources at 44 percent.

Natural gas is delivered through a nation‐wide network of high‐pressure transmission pipelines. In 2020, SDG&E provided 505.2 Million Therms of natural gas.15
The following summary of natural gas resources and service providers, delivery systems, and associated regulation is excerpted from information provided by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC).

The CPUC regulates natural gas utility service for approximately 11 million customers that receive natural gas from Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E), Southern California Gas (SoCalGas), San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E), Southwest Gas, and several smaller investor-owned natural gas utilities. The CPUC also regulates independent storage operators Lodi Gas Storage, Wild Goose Storage, Central Valley Storage and Gill Ranch Storage.

California's natural gas utilities provide service to over 11 million gas meters. SoCalGas and PG&E provide service to about 5.9 million and 4.3 million customers, respectively, while SDG&E provides service to over 800, 000 customers. In 2018, California gas utilities forecasted that they would deliver 13 https://www.sdge.com/more-information/our-company
14 Obtained from http://www.ecdms.energy.ca.gov/elecbyutil.aspx 15 Obtained from http://www.ecdms.energy.ca.gov/gasbyutil.aspx Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Setting
42 about 4740 million cubic feet per day (MMcfd) of gas to their customers, on average, under normal weather conditions.

The vast majority of California's natural gas customers are residential and small commercial customers, referred to as "core" customers. Larger volume gas customers, like electric generators and industrial customers, are called "noncore" customers. Although very small in number relative to core customers, noncore customers consume about 65% of the natural gas delivered by the state's natural gas utilities, while core customers consume about 35%.

The PUC regulates the California utilities' natural gas rates and natural gas services, including in-state transportation over the utilities' transmission and distribution pipeline systems, storage, procurement, metering and billing.

Most of the natural gas used in California comes from out-of-state natural gas basins. In 2017, for example, California utility customers received 38% of their natural gas supply from basins located in the U.S. Southwest, 27% from Canada, 27% from the U.S. Rocky Mountain area, and 8% from production located in California.”16
Table 8: SDG&E 2019 Power Content Mix
Energy Resources 2019 SDG&E Power Mix
Eligible Renewable1 31.3%
Biomass & Biowaste 2%
Geothermal 0%
Eligible Hydroelectric 0%
Solar 17%
Wind 13%
Coal 0%
Large Hydroelectric 0%
Natural Gas 24%
Nuclear 0%
Other 0%
Unspecified Sources of
power2
44%
Total 100%
Notes:

Source: 'https://www.sdge.com/sites/default/files/documents/FINAL_S2010027_DecOnsert20.pdf 16California Public Utilities Commission. Natural Gas and California. http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/natural_gas/ Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Setting
43 (1) The eligible renewable percentage above does not reflect RPS compliance, which is determined using a different methodology.
(2) Unspecified sources of power means electricity from transactions that are not traceable to specific generation sources.

3.3.3 Transportation Energy Resources
The project would attract additional vehicle trips with resulting consumption of energy resources, predominantly gasoline and diesel fuel. Gasoline (and other vehicle fuels) are commercially‐provided commodities and would be available to the project patrons and employees via commercial outlets.

The most recent data available shows the transportation sector emits 40 percent of the total greenhouse gases in the state and about 84 percent of smog-forming oxides of nitrogen (NOx).17,18 About 28 percent of total United States energy consumption in 2019 was for transporting people and goods from one place to another. In 2019, petroleum comprised about 91 percent of all transportation energy use, excluding fuel consumed for aviation and most marine vessels.19 In 2020, about 123.49 billion gallons (or about

2.94 billion barrels) of finished motor gasoline were consumed in the United States, an average of about 337 million gallons (or about 8.03 million barrels) per day.20 17 CARB. California Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory – 2020 Edition. https://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/inventory/data/data.htm 18 CARB. 2016 SIP Emission Projection Data. https://www.arb.ca.gov/app/emsinv/2017/emseic1_query.php?F_DIV=- 4&F_YR=2012&F_SEASON=A&SP=SIP105ADJ&F_AREA=CA
19 US Energy Information Administration. Use of Energy in the United States Explained: Energy Use for Transportation. https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/?page=us_energy_transportation 20 https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=23&t=10
Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Modeling Parameters and Assumptions 44 4.0 Modeling Parameters and Assumptions

4.1 Construction
Typical emission rates from construction activities were obtained from CalEEMod Version 2020.4.0 CalEEMod is a computer model published by the SCAQMD for estimating air pollutant emissions. The CalEEMod program uses the EMFAC2017 computer program to calculate the emission rates specific for the southwestern portion of Los Angeles County for construction-related employee vehicle trips and the OFFROAD2011 computer program to calculate emission rates for heavy truck operations. EMFAC2017 and OFFROAD2011 are computer programs generated by CARB that calculates composite emission rates for vehicles. Emission rates are reported by the program in grams per trip and grams per mile or grams per running hour. Using CalEEMod, the peak daily air pollutant emissions were calculated and presented below. These emissions represent the highest level of emissions for each of the construction phases in terms of air pollutant emissions.

The analysis assesses the emissions associated with the construction of the proposed project as indicated in Table 1. Per the project owner, the proposed project is to be operational in 2023; therefore, construction is estimated to start no sooner than July 2022 and be completed by June 2023. The phases of the construction activities which have been analyzed below are: 1) demolition, 2) site preparation, 3) grading, 4) building, 5) paving, and 6) architectural coating. For details on construction modeling and construction equipment for each phase, please see Appendix A.

The project will be required to comply with existing SCAQMD rules for the reduction of fugitive dust emissions. SCAQMD Rule 403 establishes these procedures. Compliance with this rule is achieved through application of standard best management practices in construction and operation activities, such as application of water or chemical stabilizers to disturbed soils, managing haul road dust by application of water, covering haul vehicles, restricting vehicle speeds on unpaved roads to 15 mph, sweeping loose dirt from paved site access roadways, cessation of construction activity when winds exceed 25 mph and establishing a permanent, stabilizing ground cover on finished sites. In addition, projects that disturb 50 acres or more of soil or move 5,000 cubic yards of materials per day are required to submit a Fugitive Dust Control Plan or a Large Operation Notification Form to SCAQMD. Based on the size of the Project area (approximately 0.93 acres) and the fact that the project won’t export more than 5,000 cubic yards of material a day a Fugitive Dust Control Plan or Large Operation Notification would not be required.

SCAQMD’s Rule 403 minimum requirements require that the application of the best available dust control measures are used for all grading operations and include the application of water or other soil stabilizers in sufficient quantity to prevent the generation of visible dust plumes. Compliance with Rule 403 would require the use of water trucks during all phases where earth moving operations would occur.

Compliance with Rule 403 is required.

4.2 Operations
Operational or long-term emissions occur over the life of the Project. Both mobile and area sources generate operational emissions. Area source emissions arise from consumer product usage, gasoline- Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Modeling Parameters and Assumptions 45 powered landscape equipment, and architectural coatings (painting). Mobile source emissions from motor vehicles are the largest single long-term source of air pollutants from the operation of the Project.

Small amounts of emissions would also occur from area sources such as the consumption of from landscaping emissions and consumer product usage. The operational emissions were estimated using the latest version of CalEEMod.

Mobile Sources
Mobile sources include emissions from the additional vehicle miles generated from the proposed project. The vehicle trips associated with the proposed project are based upon the trip generation rates from CalEEMod for Condo/Townhouse Highrise uses.

The program then applies the emission factors for each trip which is provided by the EMFAC2017 model to determine the vehicular traffic pollutant emissions. The CalEEMod default trip lengths were used in this analysis. Please see CalEEMod output comments sections in Appendices A and B for details.

Area Sources
Area sources include emissions from consumer products, landscape equipment and architectural coatings. Landscape maintenance includes fuel combustion emissions from equipment such as lawn mowers, rototillers, shredders/grinders, blowers, trimmers, chain saws, and hedge trimmers, as well as air compressors, generators, and pumps. As specifics were not known about the landscaping equipment fleet, CalEEMod defaults were used to estimate emissions from landscaping equipment.

Per SCAQMD Rule 1113 as amended on June 3, 2011, the architectural coatings that would be applied after January 1, 2014 will be limited to an average of 50 grams per liter or less for buildings and 100 grams per liter or less for parking lot striping. CalEEMod architectural coating default values were adjusted accordingly.

Energy Usage
2020.4.0 CalEEMod defaults were utilized.

4.3 Localized Construction Analysis
The SCAQMD has published a “Fact Sheet for Applying CalEEMod to Localized Significance Thresholds” (South Coast Air Quality Management District 2011b). CalEEMod calculates construction emissions based on the number of equipment hours and the maximum daily disturbance activity possible for each piece of equipment. In order to compare CalEEMod reported emissions against the localized significance threshold lookup tables, the CEQA document should contain in its project design features or its mitigation measures the following parameters:

1. The off-road equipment list (including type of equipment, horsepower, and hours of operation) assumed for the day of construction activity with maximum emissions.

2. The maximum number of acres disturbed on the peak day.

3. Any emission control devices added onto off-road equipment.

4. Specific dust suppression techniques used on the day of construction activity with maximum emissions.

Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Modeling Parameters and Assumptions 46 The construction equipment showing the equipment associated with the maximum area of disturbance is shown in Table 9.

Table 9: Construction Equipment Assumptions1
Activity Equipment Number Acres/8hr-day Total Acres
Demolition
Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 0.5 0.5
Rubber Tired Dozers 1 0.5 0.5
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 0.5 1.0
Total Per Phase 2.0
Site
Preparation
Graders 1 0.5 0.5
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 0.5 0.5
Total Per Phase 1.0
Grading
Graders 1 0.5 0.5
Rubber Tired Dozers 1 0.5 0.5
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 0.5 0.5
Total Per Phase 1.5
Notes:

1. Source: CalEEMod output and South Coast AQMD, Fact Sheet for Applying CalEEMod to Localized Significance Thresholds. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/localized-significance-thresholds/caleemod-guidance.pdf?sfvrsn=2 As shown in Table 9, the maximum number of acres disturbed in a day would be 2.0 acres during demolition for the Project. However, as the project is under 1 acre, a disturbance of 1 acre will be used for analysis.

The local air quality emissions from construction were analyzed using the SCAQMD’s Mass Rate Localized Significant Threshold Look-up Tables and the methodology described in Localized Significance Threshold Methodology, prepared by SCAQMD, revised July 2008. The Look-up Tables were developed by the SCAQMD in order to readily determine if the daily emissions of CO, NOx, PM10, and PM2.5 from the proposed project could result in a significant impact to the local air quality. The emission thresholds were based on the Central Orange County source receptor area (SRA 17) and a disturbance of 1.0 acres per day, as the pr at a distance of 25 meters (82 feet). According to LST methodology, any receptor located closer than 25 meters should be based on the 25-meter threshold. The closest receptors are the single-family residential uses located 40 feet to the east and west of the Project; therefore, the 25 meters threshold was used.

4.4 Localized Operational Analysis
For operational emissions, the screening tables for a disturbance area of 1 acre per day, to be conservative, and a distance of 25 meters were used to determine significance. The tables were compared to the project’s onsite operational emissions.

Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Thresholds of Significance
47 5.0 Thresholds of Significance

5.1 Air Quality Thresholds of Significance

5.1.1 CEQA Guidelines for Air Quality
The CEQA Guidelines define a significant effect on the environment as “a substantial, or potentially substantial, adverse change in the environment.” To determine if a project would have a significant impact on air quality, the type, level, and impact of emissions generated by the project must be evaluated.

The following air quality significance thresholds are contained in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines. A significant impact would occur if the project would:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan; b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is nonattainment under an applicable national or state ambient air quality standard; c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations; or d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people.

While the final determination of whether a project is significant is within the purview of the Lead Agency pursuant to Section 15064(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, SCAQMD recommends that its quantitative air pollution thresholds be used to determine the significance of project emissions. If the Lead Agency finds that the project has the potential to exceed these air pollution thresholds, the project should be considered to have significant air quality impacts. There are daily emission thresholds for construction and operation of a proposed project in the basin.

5.1.2 Regional Significance Thresholds for Construction Emissions The following CEQA significance thresholds for construction emissions are established for the Basin:
• 75 pounds per day (lbs/day) of VOC
• 100 lbs/day of NOx
• 550 lbs/day of CO
• 150 lbs/day of PM10
• 55 lbs/day of PM2.5
• 150 lbs/day of SO2
Projects in the basin with construction-related emissions that exceed any of the emission thresholds are considered to be significant under SCAQMD guidelines.

5.1.3 Regional Significance Thresholds for Operational Emissions The daily operational emissions significance thresholds for the basin are as follows:

Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Thresholds of Significance
48 • 55 pounds per day (lbs/day) of VOC
• 55 lbs/day of NOx
• 550 lbs/day of CO
• 150 lbs/day of PM10
• 55 lbs/day of PM2.5
• 150 lbs/day of SO2
Local Microscale Concentration Standards The significance of localized project impacts under CEQA depends on whether ambient CO levels in the vicinity of the project are above or below State and federal CO standards. If ambient levels are below the standards, a project is considered to have a significant impact if project emissions result in an exceedance of one or more of these standards. If ambient levels already exceed a State or federal standard, project emissions are considered significant if they increase 1-hour CO concentrations by 1.0 ppm or more or 8-hour CO concentrations by 0.45 ppm or more. The following are applicable local emission concentration standards for CO:
• California State 1-hour CO standard of 20.0 ppm
• California State 8-hour CO standard of 9.0 ppm

5.1.4 Thresholds for Localized Significance
Project-related construction air emissions may have the potential to exceed the State and Federal air quality standards in the project vicinity, even though these pollutant emissions may not be significant enough to create a regional impact to the South Coast Air Basin. In order to assess local air quality impacts the SCAQMD has developed Localized Significant Thresholds (LSTs) to assess the project-related air emissions in the project vicinity. The SCAQMD has also provided Final Localized Significant Threshold Methodology (LST Methodology), June 2003, which details the methodology to analyze local air emission impacts. The Localized Significant Threshold Methodology found that the primary emissions of concern are NO2, CO, PM10, and PM2.5.

The emission thresholds were calculated based on the Central Orange County source receptor area (SRA 17) and a disturbance of 1 acre per day at a distance of 25 meters, for construction.

5.2 Greenhouse Gas Thresholds of Significance

5.2.1 CEQA Guidelines for Greenhouse Gas
CEQA Guidelines define a significant effect on the environment as “a substantial, or potentially substantial, adverse change in the environment.” To determine if a project would have a significant impact on greenhouse gases, the type, level, and impact of emissions generated by the project must be evaluated.

The following greenhouse gas significance thresholds are contained in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, which were amendments adopted into the Guidelines on March 18, 2010, pursuant to SB 97. A significant impact would occur if the project would:
(a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment; or
Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Thresholds of Significance
49 (b) Conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases.

However, despite this, currently neither the CEQA statutes, OPR guidelines, nor the draft proposed changes to the CEQA Guidelines prescribe thresholds of significance or a particular methodology for performing an impact analysis; as with most environmental topics, significance criteria are left to the judgment and discretion of the Lead Agency. As previously discussed (Section 2.2.4 of this report), this analysis uses the SCAQMD draft local agency tier 3 screening threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e.

5.3 Energy Thresholds of Significance
CEQA Guidelines define a significant effect on the environment as “a substantial, or potentially substantial, adverse change in the environment.” To determine if a project would have a significant impact on energy, the type, level, and impact of energy usage generated by the project must be evaluated.

CEQA Guidelines defines significant energy usage as wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy, or wasteful use of energy resources. However, despite this, currently neither the CEQA statutes, OPR guidelines, nor the draft proposed changes to the CEQA Guidelines prescribe thresholds of significance or a particular methodology for performing an impact analysis; as with most environmental topics, significance criteria are left to the judgment and discretion of the Lead Agency. As such, a qualitative review of the energy usage shall be performed to analyze construction and operation activities as well as compare overall energy usage to the local energy usage.

Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Air Quality Emissions Impact
50 6.0 Air Quality Emissions Impact

6.1 Construction Air Quality Emissions Impact
The latest version of CalEEMod was used to estimate the onsite and offsite construction emissions. The emissions incorporate Rule 402 and 403. Rule 402, 403 (fugitive dust), and 1113 are not considered mitigation measures as the project by default is required to incorporate these rules during construction.

6.1.1 Regional Construction Emissions
The construction emissions for the Project would not exceed the SCAQMD’s daily emission thresholds at the regional level as demonstrated in Table 10, and therefore would be considered less than significant.

Table 10: Regional Significance - Construction Emissions (pounds/day) – Project Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day)
Activity VOC NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5
Demolition
On-Site2 0.71 6.41 7.47 0.01 0.45 0.34
Off-Site3 0.04 0.24 0.39 0.00 0.14 0.04
Total 0.75 6.65 7.86 0.01 0.59 0.38
Site Preparation
On-Site2 0.58 6.93 3.96 0.01 0.46 0.26
Off-Site3 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.00 0.06 0.02
Total 0.59 6.94 4.12 0.01 0.52 0.27
Grading
On-Site2 1.08 12.00 5.94 0.01 0.52 0.48
Off-Site3 0.14 4.61 1.55 0.02 0.64 0.20
Total 1.23 16.61 7.49 0.03 1.16 0.67
Building Construction
On-Site2 0.69 7.03 7.15 0.01 0.37 0.34
Off-Site3 0.09 0.36 0.93 0.00 0.33 0.09
Total 0.77 7.39 8.09 0.02 0.70 0.43
Paving
On-Site2 0.74 5.92 7.03 0.01 0.30 0.28
Off-Site3 0.05 0.04 0.59 0.00 0.20 0.05
Total 0.80 5.95 7.63 0.01 0.50 0.33
Architectural Coating
On-Site2 24.31 1.41 1.81 0.00 0.08 0.08
Off-Site3 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.00 0.06 0.02
Total 24.33 1.42 1.98 0.00 0.14 0.10
Total of overlapping phases4 25.90 14.76 17.69 0.03 1.34 0.86 SCAQMD Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55
Exceeds Thresholds No No No No No No
Notes:
1 Source: CalEEMod Version 2020.4.0
2 On-site emissions from equipment operated on-site that is not operated on public roads. 3 Off-site emissions from equipment operated on public roads. 4 Construction, architectural coatings and paving phases may overlap.

Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Air Quality Emissions Impact
51 6.1.2 Localized Construction Emissions
The data provided in Table 11 shows that none of the analyzed criteria pollutants would exceed the local emissions thresholds at the nearest sensitive receptors. Therefore, a less than significant local air quality impact would occur from construction of the proposed project.

Table 11: Localized Significance – Construction
Phase
On-Site Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day)1
NOx CO PM10 PM2.5
Demolition 6.41 7.47 0.45 0.34
Site Preparation 6.93 3.96 0.46 0.26
Grading 12.00 5.94 0.52 0.48
Building Construction 7.03 7.15 0.37 0.34
Paving 5.92 7.03 0.30 0.28
Architectural Coating 1.41 1.81 0.08 0.08
Total of overlapping phases 14.35 16.00 0.75 0.70
SCAQMD Threshold for 25 meters (82 feet) or less2 81 485 4 3 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No
Notes:
1 Source: Calculated from CalEEMod and SCAQMD’s Mass Rate Look-up Tables for one acre in Central Orange County Source Receptor Area (SRA 17).

Project will disturb a maximum of 2.0 acres per day (see Table 9). 2 The nearest sensitive receptor is located adjacent to the east and west; therefore, the 25-meter threshold has been used.

6.1.3 Construction-Related Human Health Impacts
Regarding health effects related to criteria pollutant emissions, the applicable significance thresholds are established for regional compliance with the state and federal ambient air quality standards, which are intended to protect public health from both acute and long-term health impacts, depending on the potential effects of the pollutant. Because regional and local emissions of criteria pollutants during construction of the Project would be below the applicable thresholds, they would not contribute to longterm health impacts related to nonattainment of the ambient air quality standards. Therefore, significant adverse acute health impacts as a result of construction are not anticipated.

6.1.4 Odors
Potential sources that may emit odors during construction activities include the application of materials such as asphalt pavement. The objectionable odors that may be produced during the construction process are of short-term in nature and the odor emissions are expected cease upon the drying or hardening of the odor producing materials. Diesel exhaust and VOCs would be emitted during construction of the project, which are objectionable to some; however, emissions would disperse rapidly from the project site and therefore should not reach an objectionable level at the nearest sensitive receptors. Due to the short-term nature and limited amounts of odor producing materials being utilized, no significant impact related to odors would occur during construction of the proposed project.

The SCAQMD recommends that odor impacts be addressed in a qualitative manner. Such an analysis shall determine whether the project would result in excessive nuisance odors, as defined under the California Code of Regulations and Section 41700 of the California Health and Safety Code, and thus would constitute a public nuisance related to air quality.

Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Air Quality Emissions Impact
52 Potential sources that may emit odors during the on-going operations of the proposed project would include odor emissions from the onsite trash facilities. Through compliance with SCAQMD’s Rule 402, no public nuisance would be cause by odors from the project and therefore no significant impact related to odors would occur during the on-going operations of the proposed project.

6.1.5 Construction-Related Toxic Air Contaminant Impact The greatest potential for toxic air contaminant emissions would be related to diesel particulate emissions associated with heavy equipment operations during construction of the proposed project. The Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) has issued the Air Toxic Hot Spots Program Risk Assessment Guidelines and Guidance Manual for the Preparation of Health Risk Assessments, February 2015 to provide a description of the algorithms, recommended exposure variates, cancer and noncancer health values, and the air modeling protocols needed to perform a health risk assessment (HRA) under the Air Toxics Hot Spots Information and Assessment Act of 1987. Hazard identification includes identifying all substances that are evaluated for cancer risk and/or non-cancer acute, 8-hour, and chronic health impacts. In addition, identifying any multi-pathway substances that present a cancer risk or chronic non-cancer hazard via non-inhalation routes of exposure.

Given the relatively limited construction schedule, the proposed project would not result in a long-term substantial source of toxic air containment emissions and corresponding individual cancer risk.

Furthermore, construction-based particulate matter (PM) emissions (including diesel exhaust emissions) do not exceed any local or regional thresholds. Therefore, no significant short-term toxic air contaminant impacts would occur during construction of the proposed project.

6.2 Operational Air Quality Emissions Impact

6.2.1 Regional Operational Emissions
The operations-related criteria air quality impacts created by the proposed project have been analyzed through the use of CalEEMod model. The operating emissions were based on year 2024, which is the anticipated opening year for the project per the Trip Generation and Vehicle Miles Traveled Memorandum (TJW Engineering, Inc.). The summer and winter emissions created by the proposed project’s long-term operations were calculated and the highest emissions from either summer or winter are summarized in Table 12.
<Table 12, next page>
Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Air Quality Emissions Impact
53 Table 12: Regional Significance - Unmitigated Operational Emissions (lbs/day) Activity
Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day)1
VOC NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5
Area Sources2 0.44 0.02 1.49 0.00 0.01 0.01
Energy Usage3 0.01 0.05 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mobile Sources4 0.31 0.35 3.23 0.01 0.81 0.22
Total Emissions 0.77 0.42 4.74 0.01 0.82 0.23
SCAQMD Thresholds 55 55 550 150 150 55
Exceeds Threshold? No No No No No No
Notes:
1 Source: CalEEMod Version 2020.4.0
2 Area sources consist of emissions from consumer products, architectural coatings, and landscaping equipment. 3 Energy usage consists of emissions from on-site natural gas usage. 4 Mobile sources consist of emissions from vehicles and road dust.

Table 12 provides the project's unmitigated operational emissions. Table 12 shows that the project does not exceed the SCAQMD daily emission threshold and regional operational emissions are considered to be less than significant.

6.2.2 Localized Operational Emissions
Table 13 shows the calculated emissions for the proposed operational activities compared with appropriate LSTs. The LST analysis only includes on-site sources; however, the CalEEMod software outputs do not separate on-site and off-site emissions for mobile sources. For a worst-case scenario assessment, the emissions shown in Table 13 include all on-site project-related stationary sources and 10% of the project-related new mobile sources.21 This percentage is an estimate of the amount of project-related new vehicle traffic that will occur on-site. <Table 13, next page>
21 The project site is approximately 0.08 miles in length at its longest point; therefore the on-site mobile source emissions represent approximately 1/86th of the shortest CalEEMod default distance of 6.9 miles. Therefore, to be conservative, 1/10th the distance (dividing the mobile source emissions by 10) was used to represent the portion of the overall mobile source emissions that would occur on-site.

Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Air Quality Emissions Impact
54 Table 13: Localized Significance – Unmitigated Operational Emissions On-Site Emission Source
On-Site Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day)1
NOx CO PM10 PM2.5
Area Sources2 0.02 1.49 0.01 0.01
Energy Usage3 0.05 0.02 0.00 0.00
On-Site Vehicle Emissions4 0.04 0.32 0.08 0.02
Total Emissions 0.10 1.83 0.09 0.03
SCAQMD Threshold for 25 meters (82 feet)5 81 485 1 1
Exceeds Threshold? No No No No
Notes:
1 Source: Calculated from CalEEMod and SCAQMD’s Mass Rate Look-up Tables for acre in Central Orange County Source Receptor Area (SRA 17). 2 Area sources consist of emissions from consumer products, architectural coatings, and landscaping equipment. 3 Energy usage consists of emissions from generation of electricity and on-site natural gas usage. 4 On-site vehicular emissions based on 1/10 of the gross vehicular emissions and road dust. 5 The nearest sensitive receptor is located adjacent to the east; therefore, the 25-meter threshold has been used.

Table 13 indicates that the local operational emission would not exceed the LST thresholds at the nearest sensitive receptors, located adjacent to the project. Therefore, the project will not result in significant Localized Operational emissions.

6.2.3 Operations-Related Human Health Impacts
As stated previously, regarding health effects related to criteria pollutant emissions, the applicable significance thresholds are established for regional compliance with the state and federal ambient air quality standards, which are intended to protect public health from both acute and long-term health impacts, depending on the potential effects of the pollutant. Because regional and local emissions of criteria pollutants during operation of the project would be below the applicable thresholds, it would not contribute to long-term health impacts related to nonattainment of the ambient air quality standards. Therefore, significant adverse acute health impacts as a result of project operation are not anticipated.

6.3 CO Hot Spot Emissions
CO is the pollutant of major concern along roadways because the most notable source of CO is motor vehicles. For this reason, CO concentrations are usually indicative of the local air quality generated by a roadway network and are used as an indicator of potential local air quality impacts. Local air quality impacts can be assessed by comparing future without and with project CO levels to the State and Federal CO standards which were presented in above in Section 5.0.

To determine if the proposed project could cause emission levels in excess of the CO standards discussed above in Section 5.0, a sensitivity analysis is typically conducted to determine the potential for CO “hot spots” at a number of intersections in the general project vicinity. Because of reduced speeds and vehicle queuing, “hot spots” potentially can occur at high traffic volume intersections with a Level of Service E or worse.

Micro-scale air quality emissions have traditionally been analyzed in environmental documents where the air basin was a non-attainment area for CO. However, the SCAQMD has demonstrated in the CO Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Air Quality Emissions Impact
55 attainment redesignation request to EPA that there are no “hot spots” anywhere in the air basin, even at intersections with much higher volumes, much worse congestion, and much higher background CO levels than anywhere in Orange County. If the worst-case intersections in the air basin have no “hot spot” potential, any local impacts will be below thresholds.

CalEEMod output showed that the project would generate 112 average daily trips. The 1992 Federal Attainment Plan for Carbon Monoxide (1992 CO Plan) showed that an intersection which has a daily traffic volume of approximately 100,000 vehicles per day would not violate the CO standard. The volume of traffic at project buildout would be well below 100,000 vehicles and below the necessary volume to even get close to causing a violation of the CO standard. Therefore, no CO “hot spot” modeling was performed and no significant long-term air quality impact is anticipated to local air quality with the ongoing use of the proposed project.

6.4 Cumulative Regional Air Quality Impacts
Cumulative projects include local development as well as general growth within the project area.

However, as with most development, the greatest source of emissions is from mobile sources, which travel well out of the local area. Therefore, from an air quality standpoint, the cumulative analysis would extend beyond any local projects and when wind patterns are considered, would cover an even larger area. Accordingly, the cumulative analysis for the project’s air quality must be generic by nature.

The project area is out of attainment for both ozone and PM10 particulate matter. Construction and operation of cumulative projects will further degrade the local air quality, as well as the air quality of the South Coast Air Basin. The greatest cumulative impact on the quality of regional air cell will be the incremental addition of pollutants mainly from increased traffic from residential, commercial, and industrial development and the use of heavy equipment and trucks associated with the construction of these projects. Air quality will be temporarily degraded during construction activities that occur separately or simultaneously. However, in accordance with the SCAQMD methodology, projects that do not exceed the SCAQMD criteria or can be mitigated to less than criteria levels are not significant and do not add to the overall cumulative impact. The project does not exceed any of the thresholds of significance and therefore is considered less than significant.

6.5 Air Quality Compliance
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a discussion of any inconsistencies between a proposed project and applicable General Plans and Regional Plans (CEQA Guidelines Section 15125). The regional plan that applies to the proposed project includes the SCAQMD Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). Therefore, this section discusses any potential inconsistencies of the proposed project with the AQMP.

The purpose of this discussion is to set forth the issues regarding consistency with the assumptions and objectives of the AQMP and discuss whether the proposed project would interfere with the region’s ability to comply with Federal and State air quality standards. If the decision-makers determine that the proposed project is inconsistent, the lead agency may consider project modifications or inclusion of mitigation to eliminate the inconsistency.

Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Air Quality Emissions Impact
56 The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook states that "New or amended General Plan Elements (including land use zoning and density amendments), Specific Plans, and significant projects must be analyzed for consistency with the AQMP." Strict consistency with all aspects of the plan is usually not required. A proposed project should be considered to be consistent with the AQMP if it furthers one or more policies and does not obstruct other policies. The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook identifies two key indicators of consistency:
(1) Whether the project will result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations or cause or contribute to new violations, or delay timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emission reductions specified in the AQMP. (2) Whether the project will exceed the assumptions in the AQMP in 2016 or increments based on the year of project buildout and phase.

Both of these criteria are evaluated in the following sections.

A. Criterion 1 - Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations Based on the air quality modeling analysis contained in this Air Analysis in Tables 10 and 11, short-term construction impacts will not result in significant impacts based on the SCAQMD regional and local thresholds of significance. This Air Analysis also found that, long-term operations impacts will not result in significant impacts based on the SCAQMD local and regional thresholds of significance, as shown in Tables 12 and 13.

Therefore, the proposed project is not projected to contribute to the exceedance of any air pollutant concentration standards and is found to be consistent with the AQMP for the first criterion.

B. Criterion 2 - Exceed Assumptions in the AQMP?
Consistency with the AQMP assumptions is determined by performing an analysis of the proposed project with the assumptions in the AQMP. The emphasis of this criterion is to ensure that the analyses conducted for the proposed project are based on the same forecasts as the AQMP. Connect SoCal, the 2020-2045 Regional Transportation/Sustainable Communities Strategy, prepared by SCAG, 2020, includes core visions of demand & system management, goods movement, complete streets, system preservation and resilience, transit backbone, and sustainable development. These core visions currently respond directly to federal and state requirements placed on SCAG. Local governments are required to use these as the basis of their plans for purposes of consistency with applicable regional plans under CEQA. For this project, the City of Anaheim General Plan defines the assumptions that are represented in the AQMP.

The proposed project has a current land use classification of low density residential with “T” Transition zone according to the City of Anaheim General Plan Land Use Map. The proposed project is to develop the site with 18 townhomes. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in an inconsistency with the land use designation in the City of Anaheim General Plan. Therefore, the proposed project is not anticipated to exceed the AQMP assumptions for the project site and is found to be consistent with the AQMP for the second criterion.

Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Air Quality Emissions Impact
57 Based on the above, the proposed project will not result in an inconsistency with the SCAQMD AQMP.

Therefore, a less than significant impact will occur.

Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis
58 7.0 Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis

7.1 Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact
The greenhouse gas emissions from project construction equipment and worker vehicles are shown in Table 14. The emissions are from all phases of construction. The total construction emissions amortized over a period of 30 years are estimated at 2.72 metric tons of CO2e per year. Annual CalEEMod output calculations are provided in Appendix B.

Table 14: Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Activity
Emissions (MTCO2e)1
Onsite Offsite Total
Demolition 5.2308 0.8882 6.12
Site Preparation 0.43 0.02 0.45
Grading 1.25 1.97 3.22
Building Construction 50.48 17.81 68.29
Paving 2.37 0.39 2.76
Coating 0.64 0.11 0.75
Total 60.39 21.19 81.59
Averaged over 30 years2 2.01 0.71 2.72
Notes:

1. MTCO2e=metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents (includes carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide).

2. The emissions are averaged over 30 years because the average is added to the operational emissions, pursuant to SCAQMD. * CalEEMod output (Appendix B)

7.2 Operational Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact
Operational emissions occur over the life of the project. The operational emissions for the project are 175.05 metric tons of CO2e per year (see Table 15). Furthermore, as shown in Table 15, the project’s total emissions (with incorporation of construction related GHG emissions) would be 177.77 metric tons of CO2e per year. These emissions do not exceed the SCAQMD screening threshold of 3,000 metric tons of CO2e per year. Therefore, the project's GHG emissions are considered to be less than significant. <Table 15, next page>
Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis
59 Table 15: Unmitigated Project-Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions Category
Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Metric Tons/Year)1
Bio-CO2 NonBio-CO2 CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Area Sources2 0.00 0.30 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.31
Energy Usage3 0.00 37.31 37.31 0.00 0.00 37.51
Mobile Sources4 0.00 125.53 125.53 0.01 0.01 127.28
Solid Waste5 1.68 0.00 1.68 0.10 0.00 4.16
Water6 0.37 4.17 4.54 0.04 0.00 5.78
Construction7 0.00 2.69 2.69 0.00 0.00 2.72
Total Emissions 2.05 170.00 172.05 0.15 0.01 177.77
SCAQMD Draft Screening Threshold 3,000
Exceeds Threshold? No
Notes:
1 Source: CalEEMod Version 2020.4.0
2 Area sources consist of GHG emissions from consumer products, architectural coatings, and landscape equipment. 3 Energy usage consist of GHG emissions from electricity and natural gas usage. 4 Mobile sources consist of GHG emissions from vehicles. 5 Solid waste includes the CO2 and CH4 emissions created from the solid waste placed in landfills. 6 Water includes GHG emissions from electricity used for transport of water and processing of wastewater. 7 Construction GHG emissions based on a 30-year amortization rate.

7.3 Greenhouse Gas Plan Consistency
The proposed project could have the potential to conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases. The project’s GHG impacts are evaluated by assessing the project’s consistency with applicable statewide, regional, and local GHG reduction plans and strategies.

The Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) encourages lead agencies to make use of programmatic mitigation plans and programs from which to tier when they perform individual project analyses. The City has adopted the City of Anaheim Municipal GHG Reduction Plan which encourages and requires applicable projects to implement energy efficiency measures. In addition, the California Climate Action Team (CAT) Report provides recommendations for specific emission reduction strategies for reducing GHG emissions and reaching the targets established in AB 32 and Executive Order S-3-05.

On a statewide level, the 2008 Climate Change Scoping Plan provides measures to achieve AB 32 targets.

Thus, if the project complies with these plans, policies, regulations, and requirements, the project would result in a less than significant impact because it would be consistent with the overarching state, regional, and local plans for GHG reduction.

A consistency analysis is provided below and describes the project’s compliance with or exceedance of performance-based standards included in the regulations outlined in the applicable portions of the City of Anaheim GHG Reduction Plan.

Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis
60 City of Anaheim Sustainability Programs Consistency Analysis The focus of the City’s GHG Reduction Plan included promoting energy- and water-efficient buildings, smart growth and clean transit, zero waste policies, and increased local energy generation and water resources. Table 16 summarizes applicable reduction strategies from the plan and evaluates project consistency with each strategy. The project would be consistent with all applicable plan reduction strategies; therefore, the project would not conflict with the plan.

Table 16: Project Consistency with the City of Anaheim GHG Reduction Plan Measure Summary Project Consistency
Anaheim Public Utilities Incentive
Programs
The program encompasses more than
45 rebates and incentive programs
offered to businesses and residents in
Anaheim to assist them in water and
energy savings.

Consistent. The project would be
located within 0.15 miles of a grocery
store and multiple restaurants.

Electric Vehicle Charging
The City of Anaheim developed a
streamlined process to promote use of
electric vehicles (EV) and created a
rebate program for installation of EV
chargers. The City currently offers
rebate programs for private- and
public-use EV chargers
Consistent. The project will not
conflict with the plan to promote
electric vehicles.

Green Building Program/Incentives
This program provides rebates for
buildings certified as “green” by the US
Green Building Council, California
Green Build, Build It Green, or other
rating program.

Consistent. The project will not install
any indoor or outdoor wood burning
devices.

Green Connection Resolution and
Updates
In 2006, the Anaheim City Council
adopted a resolution establishing a
series of goals that are grounded in the
principles of environmental soundness
and sustainable development. Through
this program, City residents can track
the City’s progress and see the most
recent green developments.

Consistent. The project will be
planting trees for shade throughout
the parking lot.

Notes:
1 Source: City of La Anaheim GHG Reduction Plan, 2015.

Therefore, the project would not conflict with any applicable greenhouse gas related plan, policy or regulation. Furthermore, the project will also comply with applicable Green Building Standards and City of Anaheim policies regarding sustainability (as dictated by the City's General Plan). Impacts are considered to be less than significant and further analysis is not warranted.

Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Energy Analysis
61 8.0 Energy Analysis
Information from the CalEEMod 2020.4.0 Daily and Annual Outputs contained in the air quality and greenhouse gas analyses above was utilized for this analysis. The CalEEMod outputs detail project related construction equipment, transportation energy demands, and facility energy demands.

8.1 Construction Energy Demand

8.1.1 Construction Equipment Electricity Usage Estimates Electrical service will be provided by Southern California Edison (SCE). Based on the 2017 National Construction Estimator, Richard Pray (2017)22, the typical power cost per 1,000 square feet of building construction per month is estimated to be $2.32. The project plans to develop the site with 32,400 square feet of new single-family houses over the course of approximately 12 months.23 Based on Table 17, the total power cost of the on-site electricity usage during the construction of the proposed project is estimated to be approximately $902.02. As shown in Table 17, the total electricity usage from Project construction related activities is estimated to be approximately 16,400 kWh.24 Table 17: Project Construction Power Cost and Electricity Usage Power Cost (per 1,000 square
foot of building per month of
construction)
Total Building
Size (1,000
Square Foot)1
Construction
Duration
(months)
Total Project
Construction
Power Cost
$2.32 32 12 $902.02
Cost per kWh
Total Project Construction
Electricity Usage (kWh)
$0.06 16,400
* Assumes the project will be under the GS-1 General Service rate under SCE. 22 Pray, Richard. 2017 National Construction Estimator. Carlsbad: Craftsman Book Company, 2017. 23 As stated in the project description, the project involves the demolition of approximately 21,000 square feet of existing residences. 24 LADWP’s Small Commercial & Multi-Family Service (A-1) is approximately $0.06 per kWh of electricity Southern California Edison (SCE). Rates & Pricing Choices: General Service/Industrial Rates. https://library.sce.com/content/dam/sce - doclib/public/regulatory/historical/electric/2020/schedules/general-service-&-industrial-rates/ELECTRIC_SCHEDULES_GS-1_2020.pdf Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Energy Analysis
62 8.1.2 Construction Equipment Fuel Estimates
Using the CalEEMod data input, the project’s construction phase would consume electricity and fossil fuels as a single energy demand, that is, once construction is completed their use would cease. CARB’s 2017 Emissions Factors Tables show that on average aggregate fuel consumption (gasoline and diesel fuel) would be approximately 18.5 hp-hr-gal.25 As presented in Table 18 below, project construction activities would consume an estimated 8,143 gallons of diesel fuel.

Table 18: Construction Equipment Fuel Consumption Estimates Phase
Number
of Days Offroad Equipment Type Amount
Usage
Hours
Horse
Power
Load
Factor
HP
hrs/
day
Total Fuel
Consumption
(gal diesel
fuel)1
Demolition
10 Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8 81 0.73 473 255.70
10 Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8 247 0.4 790 427.24
10 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 7 97 0.37 502 271.60
Site
Preparation
1 Graders 1 8 187 0.41 613 33.15
1 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7 97 0.37 251 13.58
Grading
2 Graders 1 8 187 0.41 613 66.31
2 Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8 247 0.4 790 85.45
2 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8 97 0.37 574 62.08
100 Cranes 1 8 231 0.29 536 2,896.86
100 Forklifts 2 7 89 0.2 249 1,347.03
Building
Construction
100 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6 97 0.37 431 2,328.00
5 Cement and Mortar Mixers 4 8 9 0.56 161 43.59
5 Pavers 1 8 130 0.42 437 118.05
5 Rollers 1 8 80 0.38 243 65.73
5 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7 97 0.37 251 67.90
Paving
5 Air Compressors 1 6 78 0.48 225 60.71
10 Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8 81 0.73 473 255.70
10 Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8 247 0.4 790 427.24
Architectural
Coating 10 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 7 97 0.37 502 271.60 CONSTRUCTION FUEL DEMAND (gallons of diesel fuel) 8,143 Notes:
1Using Carl Moyer Guidelines Table D-21 Fuel consumption rate factors (bhp-hr/gal) for engines less than 750 hp. (Source: https://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/moyer/guidelines/2017gl/2017_gl_appendix_d.pdf) 25 Aggregate fuel consumption rate for all equipment was estimated at 18.5 hp -hr/day (from CARB’s 2017 Emissions Factors Tables and fuel consumption rate factors as shown in Table D-21 of the Moyer Guidelines:
(https://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/moyer/guidelines/2017gl/2017_gl_appendix_d.pdf).

Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Energy Analysis
63 8.1.3 Construction Worker Fuel Estimates
It is assumed that all construction worker trips are from light duty autos (LDA) along area roadways. With respect to estimated VMT, the construction worker trips would generate an estimated 38,676 VMT.

Vehicle fuel efficiencies for construction workers were estimated in the air quality and greenhouse gas analysis using information generated using CARB’s EMFAC model (see Appendix C for details). Table 19 shows that an estimated 1,299 gallons of fuel would be consumed for construction worker trips.

Table 19: Construction Worker Fuel Consumption Estimates Phase
Number of
Days
Worker
Trips/Day
Trip Length
(miles)
Vehicle
Miles
Traveled
Average
Vehicle Fuel
Economy
(mpg)
Estimated Fuel
Consumption
(gallons)
Demolition 10 10 14.7 1,470 30.95 47
Site Preparation 1 5 14.7 74 30.95 2
Grading 2 8 14.7 235 30.95 8
Building Construction 100 25 14.7 36,750 30.95 1,187
Paving 5 18 14.7 1,323 30.95 43
Architectural Coating 5 5 14.7 368 30.95 12
Total Construction Worker Fuel Consumption 1,299
Notes:
1Assumptions for the worker trip length and vehicle miles traveled are consistent with CalEEMod 2020.4.0 defaults.

8.1.4 Construction Vendor/Hauling Fuel Estimates
Tables 20 and 21 show the estimated fuel consumption for vendor and hauling during building construction and architectural coating. With respect to estimated VMT, the vendor and hauling trips would generate an estimated 6,290 VMT. For the architectural coatings it is assumed that the contractors would be responsible for bringing coatings and equipment with them in their light duty vehicles.26 Tables 20 and 21 show that an estimated 740 gallons of fuel would be consumed for vendor and hauling trips. <Tables 20 & 21, next page>
26 Vendors delivering construction material or hauling debris from the site during grading would use medium to heavy duty vehicl es with an average fuel consumption of 9.22 mpg for medium heavy -duty trucks and 6.74 mpg for heavy heavy-duty trucks (see Appendix C for details).

Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Energy Analysis
64 Table 20: Construction Vendor Fuel Consumption Estimates (MHD Trucks)1 Phase
Number of
Days
Vendor
Trips/Day
Trip Length
(miles)
Vehicle
Miles
Traveled
Average
Vehicle Fuel
Economy
(mpg)
Estimated Fuel
Consumption
(gallons)
Demolition 10 0 6.9 0 9.22 0
Site Preparation 1 0 6.9 0 9.22 0
Grading 2 0 6.9 0 9.22 0
Building Construction 100 7 6.9 4,830 9.22 524
Paving 5 0 6.9 0 9.22 0
Architectural Coating 5 0 6.9 0 9.22 0
Total Vendor Fuel Consumption 524
Notes:
1 Assumptions for the vendor trip length and vehicle miles traveled are consistent with CalEEMod 2020.4.0 defaults.

Table 21: Construction Hauling Fuel Consumption Estimates (HHD Trucks)1 Phase
Number of
Days
Hauling
Trips/Day
Trip Length
(miles)
Vehicle
Miles
Traveled
Average
Vehicle Fuel
Economy
(mpg)
Estimated Fuel
Consumption
(gallons)
Demolition 10 1.4 20 280 6.74 42
Site Preparation 1 0.0 20 0 6.74 0
Grading 2 30 20 1,180 6.74 175
Building Construction 100 0 20 0 6.74 0
Paving 5 0 20 0 6.74 0
Architectural Coating 5 0 20 0 6.74 0
Total Construction Hauling Fuel Consumption 217
Notes:
1Assumptions for the hauling trip length and vehicle miles traveled are consistent with CalEEMod 2020.40 defaults.

8.1.5 Construction Energy Efficiency/Conservation Measures Construction equipment used over the approximately 12-month construction phase would conform to CARB regulations and California emissions standards and is evidence of related fuel efficiencies. In addition, the CARB Airborne Toxic Control Measure limits idling times of construction vehicles to no more than five minutes, thereby minimizing unnecessary and wasteful consumption of fuel due to unproductive idling of construction equipment. Furthermore, the project has been designed in compliance with California’s Energy Efficiency Standards and 2019 CALGreen Standards.

Construction of the proposed residential development would require the typical use of energy resources.

There are no unusual project characteristics or construction processes that would require the use of Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Energy Analysis
65 equipment that would be more energy intensive than is used for comparable activities; or equipment that would not conform to current emissions standards (and related fuel efficiencies). Equipment employed in construction of the project would therefore not result in inefficient wasteful, or unnecessary consumption of fuel.

8.2 Operational Energy Demand
Energy consumption in support of or related to project operations would include transportation energy demands (energy consumed by employee and patron vehicles accessing the project site) and facilities energy demands (energy consumed by building operations and site maintenance activities).

8.2.1 Transportation Fuel Consumption
The largest source of operational energy use would be vehicle operation of residents. The site is located in an urbanized area just in close proximity to transit stops. Using the CalEEMod output, it is assumed that an average trip for autos were assumed to be 16.6 miles, light trucks were assumed to travel an average of 6.9 miles, and 3- 4-axle trucks were assumed to travel an average of 8.4 miles27. To show a worst-case analysis, asthe proposed project is an residential project, it was assumed that vehicles would operate 365 days per year. Table 22 shows the worst-case estimated annual fuel consumption for all classes of vehicles from autos to heavy-heavy trucks.28 Table 22 shows that an estimated 18,118 gallons of fuel would be consumed per year for the operation of the proposed project.

Table 22: Estimated Vehicle Operations Fuel Consumption Vehicle Type Vehicle Mix
Number
of
Vehicles
Average
Trip
(miles)1
Daily
VMT
Average
Fuel
Economy
(mpg)
Total
Gallons
per Day
Total Annual
Fuel
Consumption
(gallons)
Light Auto Automobile 63 16.6 1,046 31.82 32.86 11,993
Light Truck Automobile 7 6.9 47 27.16 1.73 631
Light Truck Automobile 22 6.9 149 25.6 5.82 2,126
Medium Truck Automobile 15 6.9 103 20.81 4.96 1,811
Light Heavy Truck 2-Axle Truck 3 8.4 24 13.81 1.71 626
Light Heavy Truck 10,000 lbs + 2-Axle Truck 1 8.4 6 14.18 0.45 163 Medium Heavy Truck 3-Axle Truck 2 8.4 14 9.58 1.44 527
Heavy Heavy Truck 4-Axle Truck 1 8.4 5 7.14 0.66 241
Total 112 -- 1,384 18.76 49.26 --
Total Annual Fuel Consumption 18,118
Notes:
'1 The trip generation assessment, the project is to generate 832 total net new trips after reduction of existing uses. Default CalEEMod vehicle fleet mix utilized. 1Based on the size of the site and relative location, trips were assumed to be local rather than regional. 27 CalEEMod default distance for H-W (home-work) or C-W (commercial-work) is 16.6 miles; 6.9 miles for H-S (home-shop) or C-C (commercial-customer); and 8.4 miles for H-O (home-other) or C-O (commercial-other). 28 Average fuel economy based on aggregate mileage calculated in EMFAC 2017 for opening year (2023). See Appendix C for EMFAC output.

Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Energy Analysis
66 Trip generation generated by the proposed project are consistent with other similar residential uses of similar scale and configuration as reflected in the trip generation estimate from CalEEMod. That is, the proposed project does not propose uses or operations that would inherently result in excessive and wasteful vehicle trips, nor associated excess and wasteful vehicle energy consumption. Therefore, project transportation energy consumption would not be considered inefficient, wasteful, or otherwise unnecessary.

8.2.2 Facility Energy Demands (Electricity and Natural Gas) The annual natural gas and electricity demands were provided per the CalEEMod output and are provided in Table 23.

Table 23: Project Unmitigated Annual Operational Energy Demand Summary1 Natural Gas Demand kBTU/year
Townhomes 200,693
Total 200,693
Electricity Demand kWh/year
Townhomes 73,683
Garages 75,600
Parking Lot 700
Total 149,983
Notes:
1Taken from the CalEEMod 2020.4.0 annual output.

As shown in Table 23, the estimated electricity demand for the proposed project is approximately 149,983 kWh per year. In 2020, the residential sector of the County of Orange consumed approximately 19,733 million kWh of electricity.29 In addition, the natural gas demand is approximately 200,693 kBTU per year. In 2020, the residential sector of the County of Orange consumed approximately 387 therms of natural gas.
30 Therefore, the increase in both electricity and natural gas demand from the proposed project is insignificant compared to the County’s 2020 demand.

8.3 Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Plan Consistency Regarding federal transportation regulations, the project site is located in an already developed area.

Access to/from the project site is from existing roads. These roads are already in place so the project would not interfere with, nor otherwise obstruct intermodal transportation plans or projects that may 29 California Energy Commission, Electricity Consumption by County. https://ecdms.energy.ca.gov/elecbycounty.aspx 30 California Energy Commission, Gas Consumption by County. https://ecdms.energy.ca.gov/gasbycounty.aspx Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA Energy Analysis
67 be proposed pursuant to the ISTEA because SCAG is not planning for intermodal facilities in the project area.

Regarding the State’s Energy Plan and compliance with Title 24 CCR energy efficiency standards, the applicant is required to comply with the California Green Building Standard Code requirements for energy efficient buildings and appliances as well as utility energy efficiency programs implemented by the SCE.

Regarding the State’s Renewable Energy Portfolio Standards, the project would be required to meet or exceed the energy standards established in the California Green Building Standards Code, Title 24, Part 11 (CALGreen). CalGreen Standards require that new buildings reduce water consumption, employ building commissioning to increase building system efficiencies, divert construction waste from landfills, and install low pollutant-emitting finish materials.

Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA References
68 9.0 References
The following references were used in the preparing this analysis.

California Air Pollution Control Officers Association
2009 Health Risk Assessments for Proposed Land Use Projects California Air Resources Board
2008 Resolution 08-43
2008 Recommended Approaches for Setting Interim Significance Thresholds for Greenhouse Gases under the California Environmental Quality Act
2008 ARB Recommended Interim Risk Management Policy for Inhalation-Based Residential Cancer Risk – Frequently Asked Questions
2008 Climate Change Scoping Plan, a framework for change. 2011 Supplement to the AB 32 Scoping Plan Functional Equivalent Document 2013 Revised Emission Factors for Gasoline Marketing Operations at California Gasoline Dispensing Facilities
2014 First Update to the Climate Change Scoping Plan, Building on the Framework Pursuant to AB32, the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. May. 2021 Historical Air Quality, Top 4 Summary
City of Artesia
2010 City of Artesia General Plan 2030
Governor’s Office of Planning and Research
2008 CEQA and Climate: Addressing Climate Change Through California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Review
2009 CEQA Guideline Sections to be Added or Amended
TJW Engineering, Inc.
2021 700 N. Harbor Boulevard Trip Generation and Vehicle Miles Traveled Memorandum.

November 11.

Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment
2015 Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Risk Assessment Guidelines Dale Avenue Project
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Impact Study
City of Anaheim, CA References
69 South Coast Air Quality Management District
1993 CEQA Air Quality Handbook
2005 Rule 403 Fugitive Dust
2007 2007 Air Quality Management Plan
2008 Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology, Revised 2011 Appendix A Calculation Details for CalEEMod
2012 Final 2012 Air Quality Management Plan
2016 Final 2016 Air Quality Management Plan
Appendix A:

CalEEMod Daily Emission Output
Anaheim Dale Avenue Project
Orange County, Summer
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - Per site plan, 18 townhouse units with 6,409 sf open space, 36 garage parking spaces, and 5 open parking spaces on 0.929 acres Grading - Per project applicant, 580 CY of cut and 105 CY of fill for net export of 475 CY Demolition - Estimated via Google Earth
Vehicle Trips - Per trip generation analysis, the project will generate 121 trips per day. As the previous use generated 9 trips per day, the net trip generation will be 112 trips per day (6.23 trips/unit/day)
Woodstoves - No hearths
Sequestration - Per Schematic Planting Plan

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 6.41 1000sqft 0.15 6,409.00 0 Condo/Townhouse High Rise 18.00 Dwelling Unit 0.28 18,000.00 51 Enclosed Parking Structure 36.00 Space 0.32 14,400.00 0 Parking Lot 5.00 Space 0.05 2,000.00 0
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.13 Acre 0.13 5,619.24 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
8 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 30

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
Operational Year 2023
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 25 Date: 3/28/2022 2:24 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Per Rule 403 Waste Mitigation - Per AB 341

2.0 Emissions Summary
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblFireplaces FireplaceDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblFireplaces FireplaceHourDay 3.00 0.00
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberGas 15.30 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberNoFireplace 1.80 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberWood 0.90 0.00
tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 475.00
tblSequestration NumberOfNewTrees 0.00 41.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 4.91 6.23
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 4.09 6.23
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 5.44 6.23
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 0.90 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 0.90 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 25 Date: 3/28/2022 2:24 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2022 24.3271 16.6137 8.0869 0.0325 5.9427 0.5525 6.4952 2.7372 0.5096 3.2468 0.0000 3,438.590 6 3,438.590
6 0.6334 0.3212 3,550.146
8 Maximum 24.3271 16.6137 8.0869 0.0325 5.9427 0.5525 6.4952 2.7372 0.5096 3.2468 0.0000 3,438.590 6 3,438.590
6 0.6334 0.3212 3,550.146
8 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2022 24.3271 16.6137 8.0869 0.0325 2.6861 0.5525 3.2386 1.1679 0.5096 1.6775 0.0000 3,438.590 6 3,438.590
6 0.6334 0.3212 3,550.146
8 Maximum 24.3271 16.6137 8.0869 0.0325 2.6861 0.5525 3.2386 1.1679 0.5096 1.6775 0.0000 3,438.590 6 3,438.590
6 0.6334 0.3212 3,550.146
8 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 54.80 0.00 50.14 57.33 0.00 48.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 25 Date: 3/28/2022 2:24 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 0.4447 0.0172 1.4902 8.0000e0058.2400e0038.2400e0038.2400e0038.2400e0030.0000 2.6844 2.6844 2.6000e0030.0000 2.7493 Energy 5.9300e0030.0507 0.0216 3.2000e0044.1000e0034.1000e0034.1000e0034.1000e00364.6876 64.6876 1.2400e0031.1900e00365.0720 Mobile 0.3145 0.3264 3.2252 7.6100e0030.8074 5.1000e0030.8125 0.2152 4.7400e0030.2200 783.1561 783.1561 0.0447 0.0302 793.2715 Total 0.7651 0.3943 4.7370 8.0100e0030.8074 0.0174 0.8249 0.2152 0.0171 0.2323 0.0000 850.5280 850.5280 0.0486 0.0314 861.0928 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 0.4447 0.0172 1.4902 8.0000e0058.2400e0038.2400e0038.2400e0038.2400e0030.0000 2.6844 2.6844 2.6000e0030.0000 2.7493 Energy 5.9300e0030.0507 0.0216 3.2000e0044.1000e0034.1000e0034.1000e0034.1000e00364.6876 64.6876 1.2400e0031.1900e00365.0720 Mobile 0.3145 0.3264 3.2252 7.6100e0030.8074 5.1000e0030.8125 0.2152 4.7400e0030.2200 783.1561 783.1561 0.0447 0.0302 793.2715 Total 0.7651 0.3943 4.7370 8.0100e0030.8074 0.0174 0.8249 0.2152 0.0171 0.2323 0.0000 850.5280 850.5280 0.0486 0.0314 861.0928 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 25 Date: 3/28/2022 2:24 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 7/1/2022 7/14/2022 5 10
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 7/15/2022 7/15/2022 5 1 3 Grading Grading 7/16/2022 7/19/2022 5 2
4 Building Construction Building Construction 7/20/2022 12/6/2022 5 100 5 Paving Paving 12/7/2022 12/13/2022 5 5
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 12/14/2022 12/20/2022 5 5 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 247 0.40
Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37
Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 36,450; Residential Outdoor: 12,150; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 1,706 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0.5
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 1.5
Acres of Paving: 0.65
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 25 Date: 3/28/2022 2:24 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Water Exposed Area
Grading Graders 1 6.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 6.00 247 0.40
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 4.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 2 6.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 4 6.00 9 0.56
Paving Pavers 1 7.00 130 0.42
Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.38
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 4 10.00 0.00 14.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 2 5.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 3 8.00 0.00 59.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 5 25.00 7.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 5.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 25 Date: 3/28/2022 2:24 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.2953 0.0000 0.2953 0.0447 0.0000 0.0447 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.7094 6.4138 7.4693 0.0120 0.3375 0.3375 0.3225 0.3225 1,147.902 5 1,147.902
5 0.2119 1,153.200
1 Total 0.7094 6.4138 7.4693 0.0120 0.2953 0.3375 0.6328 0.0447 0.3225 0.3673 1,147.902 5 1,147.902
5 0.2119 1,153.200
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 5.6700e0030.2180 0.0612 8.4000e0040.0244 1.6500e0030.0261 6.6900e0031.5800e0038.2600e00394.6535 94.6535 9.0200e0030.0152 99.3968 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0301 0.0202 0.3291 9.7000e0040.1118 6.0000e0040.1124 0.0296 5.6000e0040.0302 99.1080 99.1080 2.3200e0032.2100e00399.8253 Total 0.0358 0.2382 0.3903 1.8100e0030.1362 2.2500e0030.1385 0.0363 2.1400e0030.0385 193.7615 193.7615 0.0113 0.0174 199.2221 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 25 Date: 3/28/2022 2:24 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.1152 0.0000 0.1152 0.0174 0.0000 0.0174 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.7094 6.4138 7.4693 0.0120 0.3375 0.3375 0.3225 0.3225 0.0000 1,147.902 5 1,147.902
5 0.2119 1,153.200
1 Total 0.7094 6.4138 7.4693 0.0120 0.1152 0.3375 0.4527 0.0174 0.3225 0.3400 0.0000 1,147.902 5 1,147.902
5 0.2119 1,153.200
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 5.6700e0030.2180 0.0612 8.4000e0040.0244 1.6500e0030.0261 6.6900e0031.5800e0038.2600e00394.6535 94.6535 9.0200e0030.0152 99.3968 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0301 0.0202 0.3291 9.7000e0040.1118 6.0000e0040.1124 0.0296 5.6000e0040.0302 99.1080 99.1080 2.3200e0032.2100e00399.8253 Total 0.0358 0.2382 0.3903 1.8100e0030.1362 2.2500e0030.1385 0.0363 2.1400e0030.0385 193.7615 193.7615 0.0113 0.0174 199.2221 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 25 Date: 3/28/2022 2:24 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.5303 0.0000 0.5303 0.0573 0.0000 0.0573 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.5797 6.9332 3.9597 9.7300e0030.2573 0.2573 0.2367 0.2367 942.5179 942.5179 0.3048 950.1386 Total 0.5797 6.9332 3.9597 9.7300e0030.5303 0.2573 0.7876 0.0573 0.2367 0.2940 942.5179 942.5179 0.3048 950.1386 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0150 0.0101 0.1646 4.9000e0040.0559 3.0000e0040.0562 0.0148 2.8000e0040.0151 49.5540 49.5540 1.1600e0031.1100e00349.9127 Total 0.0150 0.0101 0.1646 4.9000e0040.0559 3.0000e0040.0562 0.0148 2.8000e0040.0151 49.5540 49.5540 1.1600e0031.1100e00349.9127 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 25 Date: 3/28/2022 2:24 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.2068 0.0000 0.2068 0.0223 0.0000 0.0223 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.5797 6.9332 3.9597 9.7300e0030.2573 0.2573 0.2367 0.2367 0.0000 942.5179 942.5179 0.3048 950.1386 Total 0.5797 6.9332 3.9597 9.7300e0030.2068 0.2573 0.4641 0.0223 0.2367 0.2591 0.0000 942.5179 942.5179 0.3048 950.1386 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0150 0.0101 0.1646 4.9000e0040.0559 3.0000e0040.0562 0.0148 2.8000e0040.0151 49.5540 49.5540 1.1600e0031.1100e00349.9127 Total 0.0150 0.0101 0.1646 4.9000e0040.0559 3.0000e0040.0562 0.0148 2.8000e0040.0151 49.5540 49.5540 1.1600e0031.1100e00349.9127 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 25 Date: 3/28/2022 2:24 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 5.3388 0.0000 5.3388 2.5726 0.0000 2.5726 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.0832 12.0046 5.9360 0.0141 0.5173 0.5173 0.4759 0.4759 1,364.819 8 1,364.819
8 0.4414 1,375.855
1 Total 1.0832 12.0046 5.9360 0.0141 5.3388 0.5173 5.8561 2.5726 0.4759 3.0485 1,364.819 8 1,364.819
8 0.4414 1,375.855
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.1195 4.5929 1.2901 0.0176 0.5145 0.0348 0.5493 0.1409 0.0333 0.1741 1,994.484 4 1,994.484
4 0.1901 0.3194 2,094.431
5 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0241 0.0162 0.2633 7.8000e0040.0894 4.8000e0040.0899 0.0237 4.4000e0040.0242 79.2864 79.2864 1.8500e0031.7700e00379.8603 Total 0.1436 4.6091 1.5534 0.0184 0.6039 0.0352 0.6392 0.1646 0.0337 0.1983 2,073.770 8 2,073.770
8 0.1920 0.3212 2,174.291
7 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 25 Date: 3/28/2022 2:24 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 2.0821 0.0000 2.0821 1.0033 0.0000 1.0033 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.0832 12.0046 5.9360 0.0141 0.5173 0.5173 0.4759 0.4759 0.0000 1,364.819 8 1,364.819
8 0.4414 1,375.855
1 Total 1.0832 12.0046 5.9360 0.0141 2.0821 0.5173 2.5994 1.0033 0.4759 1.4792 0.0000 1,364.819 8 1,364.819
8 0.4414 1,375.855
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.1195 4.5929 1.2901 0.0176 0.5145 0.0348 0.5493 0.1409 0.0333 0.1741 1,994.484 4 1,994.484
4 0.1901 0.3194 2,094.431
5 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0241 0.0162 0.2633 7.8000e0040.0894 4.8000e0040.0899 0.0237 4.4000e0040.0242 79.2864 79.2864 1.8500e0031.7700e00379.8603 Total 0.1436 4.6091 1.5534 0.0184 0.6039 0.0352 0.6392 0.1646 0.0337 0.1983 2,073.770 8 2,073.770
8 0.1920 0.3212 2,174.291
7 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 25 Date: 3/28/2022 2:24 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.6863 7.0258 7.1527 0.0114 0.3719 0.3719 0.3422 0.3422 1,103.939 3 1,103.939
3 0.3570 1,112.865
2 Total 0.6863 7.0258 7.1527 0.0114 0.3719 0.3719 0.3422 0.3422 1,103.939 3 1,103.939
3 0.3570 1,112.865
2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0116 0.3141 0.1115 1.3300e0030.0448 3.0600e0030.0478 0.0129 2.9200e0030.0158 145.1503 145.1503 8.3200e0030.0208 151.5570 Worker 0.0752 0.0505 0.8227 2.4400e0030.2794 1.5100e0030.2810 0.0741 1.3900e0030.0755 247.7699 247.7699 5.7900e0035.5300e003249.5633 Total 0.0869 0.3646 0.9343 3.7700e0030.3242 4.5700e0030.3288 0.0870 4.3100e0030.0913 392.9202 392.9202 0.0141 0.0263 401.1203 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 25 Date: 3/28/2022 2:24 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.6863 7.0258 7.1527 0.0114 0.3719 0.3719 0.3422 0.3422 0.0000 1,103.939 3 1,103.939
3 0.3570 1,112.865
2 Total 0.6863 7.0258 7.1527 0.0114 0.3719 0.3719 0.3422 0.3422 0.0000 1,103.939 3 1,103.939
3 0.3570 1,112.865
2 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0116 0.3141 0.1115 1.3300e0030.0448 3.0600e0030.0478 0.0129 2.9200e0030.0158 145.1503 145.1503 8.3200e0030.0208 151.5570 Worker 0.0752 0.0505 0.8227 2.4400e0030.2794 1.5100e0030.2810 0.0741 1.3900e0030.0755 247.7699 247.7699 5.7900e0035.5300e003249.5633 Total 0.0869 0.3646 0.9343 3.7700e0030.3242 4.5700e0030.3288 0.0870 4.3100e0030.0913 392.9202 392.9202 0.0141 0.0263 401.1203 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 25 Date: 3/28/2022 2:24 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.6 Paving - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.6469 5.9174 7.0348 0.0113 0.2961 0.2961 0.2758 0.2758 1,035.824 6 1,035.824
6 0.3017 1,043.367
7 Paving 0.0943 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.7412 5.9174 7.0348 0.0113 0.2961 0.2961 0.2758 0.2758 1,035.824 6 1,035.824
6 0.3017 1,043.367
7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0542 0.0364 0.5924 1.7500e0030.2012 1.0900e0030.2023 0.0534 1.0000e0030.0544 178.3944 178.3944 4.1700e0033.9800e003179.6856 Total 0.0542 0.0364 0.5924 1.7500e0030.2012 1.0900e0030.2023 0.0534 1.0000e0030.0544 178.3944 178.3944 4.1700e0033.9800e003179.6856 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 25 Date: 3/28/2022 2:24 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.6 Paving - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.6469 5.9174 7.0348 0.0113 0.2961 0.2961 0.2758 0.2758 0.0000 1,035.824 6 1,035.824
6 0.3017 1,043.367
7 Paving 0.0943 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.7412 5.9174 7.0348 0.0113 0.2961 0.2961 0.2758 0.2758 0.0000 1,035.824 6 1,035.824
6 0.3017 1,043.367
7 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0542 0.0364 0.5924 1.7500e0030.2012 1.0900e0030.2023 0.0534 1.0000e0030.0544 178.3944 178.3944 4.1700e0033.9800e003179.6856 Total 0.0542 0.0364 0.5924 1.7500e0030.2012 1.0900e0030.2023 0.0534 1.0000e0030.0544 178.3944 178.3944 4.1700e0033.9800e003179.6856 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 25 Date: 3/28/2022 2:24 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 24.1076 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2045 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e0030.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Total 24.3121 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e0030.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0150 0.0101 0.1646 4.9000e0040.0559 3.0000e0040.0562 0.0148 2.8000e0040.0151 49.5540 49.5540 1.1600e0031.1100e00349.9127 Total 0.0150 0.0101 0.1646 4.9000e0040.0559 3.0000e0040.0562 0.0148 2.8000e0040.0151 49.5540 49.5540 1.1600e0031.1100e00349.9127 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 25 Date: 3/28/2022 2:24 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 24.1076 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2045 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e0030.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Total 24.3121 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e0030.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0150 0.0101 0.1646 4.9000e0040.0559 3.0000e0040.0562 0.0148 2.8000e0040.0151 49.5540 49.5540 1.1600e0031.1100e00349.9127 Total 0.0150 0.0101 0.1646 4.9000e0040.0559 3.0000e0040.0562 0.0148 2.8000e0040.0151 49.5540 49.5540 1.1600e0031.1100e00349.9127 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 25 Date: 3/28/2022 2:24 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 0.3145 0.3264 3.2252 7.6100e0030.8074 5.1000e0030.8125 0.2152 4.7400e0030.2200 783.1561 783.1561 0.0447 0.0302 793.2715 Unmitigated 0.3145 0.3264 3.2252 7.6100e0030.8074 5.1000e0030.8125 0.2152 4.7400e0030.2200 783.1561 783.1561 0.0447 0.0302 793.2715

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00
Condo/Townhouse High Rise 112.14 112.14 112.14 383,199 383,199 Enclosed Parking Structure 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 112.14 112.14 112.14 383,199 383,199
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Condo/Townhouse High Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 25 Date: 3/28/2022 2:24 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Enclosed Parking Structure 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Condo/Townhouse High Rise 0.544795 0.058861 0.186903 0.129401 0.024381 0.006522 0.014242 0.004855 0.000656 0.000385 0.024332 0.000723 0.003942 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.544795 0.058861 0.186903 0.129401 0.024381 0.006522 0.014242 0.004855 0.000656 0.000385 0.024332 0.000723 0.003942 Enclosed Parking Structure 0.544795 0.058861 0.186903 0.129401 0.024381 0.006522 0.014242 0.004855 0.000656 0.000385 0.024332 0.000723 0.003942 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.544795 0.058861 0.186903 0.129401 0.024381 0.006522 0.014242 0.004855 0.000656 0.000385 0.024332 0.000723 0.003942 Parking Lot 0.544795 0.058861 0.186903 0.129401 0.024381 0.006522 0.014242 0.004855 0.000656 0.000385 0.024332 0.000723 0.003942

5.0 Energy Detail

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 25 Date: 3/28/2022 2:24 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

5.9300e0030.0507 0.0216 3.2000e0044.1000e0034.1000e0034.1000e0034.1000e00364.6876 64.6876 1.2400e0031.1900e00365.0720 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

5.9300e0030.0507 0.0216 3.2000e0044.1000e0034.1000e0034.1000e0034.1000e00364.6876 64.6876 1.2400e0031.1900e00365.0720

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Condo/Townhous
e High Rise
549.844 5.9300e0030.0507 0.0216 3.2000e0044.1000e0034.1000e0034.1000e0034.1000e00364.6876 64.6876 1.2400e0031.1900e00365.0720 Enclosed Parking
Structure
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other NonAsphalt Surfaces0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 5.9300e0030.0507 0.0216 3.2000e0044.1000e0034.1000e0034.1000e0034.1000e00364.6876 64.6876 1.2400e0031.1900e00365.0720 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 25 Date: 3/28/2022 2:24 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

0.549844 5.9300e0030.0507 0.0216 3.2000e0044.1000e0034.1000e0034.1000e0034.1000e00364.6876 64.6876 1.2400e0031.1900e00365.0720 Enclosed Parking
Structure
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other NonAsphalt Surfaces0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 5.9300e0030.0507 0.0216 3.2000e0044.1000e0034.1000e0034.1000e0034.1000e00364.6876 64.6876 1.2400e0031.1900e00365.0720 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 25 Date: 3/28/2022 2:24 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 0.4447 0.0172 1.4902 8.0000e0058.2400e0038.2400e0038.2400e0038.2400e0030.0000 2.6844 2.6844 2.6000e0030.0000 2.7493 Unmitigated 0.4447 0.0172 1.4902 8.0000e0058.2400e0038.2400e0038.2400e0038.2400e0030.0000 2.6844 2.6844 2.6000e0030.0000 2.7493

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

0.0330 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.3665 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.0452 0.0172 1.4902 8.0000e0058.2400e0038.2400e0038.2400e0038.2400e0032.6844 2.6844 2.6000e0032.7493 Total 0.4447 0.0172 1.4902 8.0000e0058.2400e0038.2400e0038.2400e0038.2400e0030.0000 2.6844 2.6844 2.6000e0030.0000 2.7493 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 25 Date: 3/28/2022 2:24 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.0330 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.3665 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.0452 0.0172 1.4902 8.0000e0058.2400e0038.2400e0038.2400e0038.2400e0032.6844 2.6844 2.6000e0032.7493 Total 0.4447 0.0172 1.4902 8.0000e0058.2400e0038.2400e0038.2400e0038.2400e0030.0000 2.6844 2.6844 2.6000e0030.0000 2.7493 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 25 Date: 3/28/2022 2:24 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

11.0 Vegetation

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Institute Recycling and Composting Services

8.0 Waste Detail

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 25 Date: 3/28/2022 2:24 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Anaheim Dale Avenue Project
Orange County, Winter
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - Per site plan, 18 townhouse units with 6,409 sf open space, 36 garage parking spaces, and 5 open parking spaces on 0.929 acres Grading - Per project applicant, 580 CY of cut and 105 CY of fill for net export of 475 CY Demolition - Estimated via Google Earth
Vehicle Trips - Per trip generation analysis, the project will generate 121 trips per day. As the previous use generated 9 trips per day, the net trip generation will be 112 trips per day (6.23 trips/unit/day)
Woodstoves - No hearths
Sequestration - Per Schematic Planting Plan

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
8 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 30

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
Operational Year 2023
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 25 Date: 3/28/2022 2:29 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Per Rule 403 Waste Mitigation - Per AB 341

2.0 Emissions Summary
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblFireplaces FireplaceDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblFireplaces FireplaceHourDay 3.00 0.00
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberGas 15.30 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberNoFireplace 1.80 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberWood 0.90 0.00
tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 475.00
tblSequestration NumberOfNewTrees 0.00 41.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 4.91 6.23
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 4.09 6.23
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 5.44 6.23
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 0.90 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 0.90 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 25 Date: 3/28/2022 2:29 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2022 24.3285 16.7957 8.0338 0.0324 5.9427 0.5526 6.4953 2.7372 0.5097 3.2469 0.0000 3,435.263 1 3,435.263
1 0.6332 0.3214 3,546.875
0 Maximum 24.3285 16.7957 8.0338 0.0324 5.9427 0.5526 6.4953 2.7372 0.5097 3.2469 0.0000 3,435.263 1 3,435.263
1 0.6332 0.3214 3,546.875
0 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2022 24.3285 16.7957 8.0338 0.0324 2.6861 0.5526 3.2386 1.1679 0.5097 1.6776 0.0000 3,435.263 1 3,435.263
1 0.6332 0.3214 3,546.875
0 Maximum 24.3285 16.7957 8.0338 0.0324 2.6861 0.5526 3.2386 1.1679 0.5097 1.6776 0.0000 3,435.263 1 3,435.263
1 0.6332 0.3214 3,546.875
0 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 54.80 0.00 50.14 57.33 0.00 48.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 25 Date: 3/28/2022 2:29 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 0.4447 0.0172 1.4902 8.0000e0058.2400e0038.2400e0038.2400e0038.2400e0030.0000 2.6844 2.6844 2.6000e0030.0000 2.7493 Energy 5.9300e0030.0507 0.0216 3.2000e0044.1000e0034.1000e0034.1000e0034.1000e00364.6876 64.6876 1.2400e0031.1900e00365.0720 Mobile 0.3127 0.3507 3.1794 7.3200e0030.8074 5.1100e0030.8125 0.2152 4.7500e0030.2200 753.1086 753.1086 0.0462 0.0315 763.6408 Total 0.7633 0.4186 4.6912 7.7200e0030.8074 0.0175 0.8249 0.2152 0.0171 0.2323 0.0000 820.4805 820.4805 0.0500 0.0327 831.4620 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 0.4447 0.0172 1.4902 8.0000e0058.2400e0038.2400e0038.2400e0038.2400e0030.0000 2.6844 2.6844 2.6000e0030.0000 2.7493 Energy 5.9300e0030.0507 0.0216 3.2000e0044.1000e0034.1000e0034.1000e0034.1000e00364.6876 64.6876 1.2400e0031.1900e00365.0720 Mobile 0.3127 0.3507 3.1794 7.3200e0030.8074 5.1100e0030.8125 0.2152 4.7500e0030.2200 753.1086 753.1086 0.0462 0.0315 763.6408 Total 0.7633 0.4186 4.6912 7.7200e0030.8074 0.0175 0.8249 0.2152 0.0171 0.2323 0.0000 820.4805 820.4805 0.0500 0.0327 831.4620 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 25 Date: 3/28/2022 2:29 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 36,450; Residential Outdoor: 12,150; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 1,706 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0.5
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 1.5
Acres of Paving: 0.65
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 25 Date: 3/28/2022 2:29 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Water Exposed Area
Grading Graders 1 6.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 6.00 247 0.40
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 4.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 2 6.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 4 6.00 9 0.56
Paving Pavers 1 7.00 130 0.42
Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.38
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 4 10.00 0.00 14.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 2 5.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 3 8.00 0.00 59.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 5 25.00 7.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 5.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 25 Date: 3/28/2022 2:29 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.2953 0.0000 0.2953 0.0447 0.0000 0.0447 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.7094 6.4138 7.4693 0.0120 0.3375 0.3375 0.3225 0.3225 1,147.902 5 1,147.902
5 0.2119 1,153.200
1 Total 0.7094 6.4138 7.4693 0.0120 0.2953 0.3375 0.6328 0.0447 0.3225 0.3673 1,147.902 5 1,147.902
5 0.2119 1,153.200
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 5.5300e0030.2265 0.0621 8.4000e0040.0244 1.6500e0030.0261 6.6900e0031.5800e0038.2700e00394.6760 94.6760 9.0100e0030.0152 99.4202 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0328 0.0222 0.3062 9.3000e0040.1118 6.0000e0040.1124 0.0296 5.6000e0040.0302 94.3562 94.3562 2.3700e0032.3600e00395.1173 Total 0.0383 0.2487 0.3684 1.7700e0030.1362 2.2500e0030.1385 0.0363 2.1400e0030.0385 189.0322 189.0322 0.0114 0.0175 194.5375 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 25 Date: 3/28/2022 2:29 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.1152 0.0000 0.1152 0.0174 0.0000 0.0174 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.7094 6.4138 7.4693 0.0120 0.3375 0.3375 0.3225 0.3225 0.0000 1,147.902 5 1,147.902
5 0.2119 1,153.200
1 Total 0.7094 6.4138 7.4693 0.0120 0.1152 0.3375 0.4527 0.0174 0.3225 0.3400 0.0000 1,147.902 5 1,147.902
5 0.2119 1,153.200
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 5.5300e0030.2265 0.0621 8.4000e0040.0244 1.6500e0030.0261 6.6900e0031.5800e0038.2700e00394.6760 94.6760 9.0100e0030.0152 99.4202 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0328 0.0222 0.3062 9.3000e0040.1118 6.0000e0040.1124 0.0296 5.6000e0040.0302 94.3562 94.3562 2.3700e0032.3600e00395.1173 Total 0.0383 0.2487 0.3684 1.7700e0030.1362 2.2500e0030.1385 0.0363 2.1400e0030.0385 189.0322 189.0322 0.0114 0.0175 194.5375 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 25 Date: 3/28/2022 2:29 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.5303 0.0000 0.5303 0.0573 0.0000 0.0573 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.5797 6.9332 3.9597 9.7300e0030.2573 0.2573 0.2367 0.2367 942.5179 942.5179 0.3048 950.1386 Total 0.5797 6.9332 3.9597 9.7300e0030.5303 0.2573 0.7876 0.0573 0.2367 0.2940 942.5179 942.5179 0.3048 950.1386 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0164 0.0111 0.1531 4.6000e0040.0559 3.0000e0040.0562 0.0148 2.8000e0040.0151 47.1781 47.1781 1.1800e0031.1800e00347.5586 Total 0.0164 0.0111 0.1531 4.6000e0040.0559 3.0000e0040.0562 0.0148 2.8000e0040.0151 47.1781 47.1781 1.1800e0031.1800e00347.5586 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 25 Date: 3/28/2022 2:29 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.2068 0.0000 0.2068 0.0223 0.0000 0.0223 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.5797 6.9332 3.9597 9.7300e0030.2573 0.2573 0.2367 0.2367 0.0000 942.5179 942.5179 0.3048 950.1386 Total 0.5797 6.9332 3.9597 9.7300e0030.2068 0.2573 0.4641 0.0223 0.2367 0.2591 0.0000 942.5179 942.5179 0.3048 950.1386 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0164 0.0111 0.1531 4.6000e0040.0559 3.0000e0040.0562 0.0148 2.8000e0040.0151 47.1781 47.1781 1.1800e0031.1800e00347.5586 Total 0.0164 0.0111 0.1531 4.6000e0040.0559 3.0000e0040.0562 0.0148 2.8000e0040.0151 47.1781 47.1781 1.1800e0031.1800e00347.5586 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 25 Date: 3/28/2022 2:29 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 5.3388 0.0000 5.3388 2.5726 0.0000 2.5726 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.0832 12.0046 5.9360 0.0141 0.5173 0.5173 0.4759 0.4759 1,364.819 8 1,364.819
8 0.4414 1,375.855
1 Total 1.0832 12.0046 5.9360 0.0141 5.3388 0.5173 5.8561 2.5726 0.4759 3.0485 1,364.819 8 1,364.819
8 0.4414 1,375.855
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.1166 4.7733 1.3090 0.0176 0.5145 0.0348 0.5493 0.1409 0.0333 0.1742 1,994.958 3 1,994.958
3 0.1899 0.3195 2,094.926
1 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0262 0.0178 0.2450 7.4000e0040.0894 4.8000e0040.0899 0.0237 4.4000e0040.0242 75.4850 75.4850 1.8900e0031.8800e00376.0938 Total 0.1428 4.7911 1.5540 0.0184 0.6039 0.0353 0.6392 0.1646 0.0338 0.1984 2,070.443 3 2,070.443
3 0.1918 0.3214 2,171.019
9 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 25 Date: 3/28/2022 2:29 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 2.0821 0.0000 2.0821 1.0033 0.0000 1.0033 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.0832 12.0046 5.9360 0.0141 0.5173 0.5173 0.4759 0.4759 0.0000 1,364.819 8 1,364.819
8 0.4414 1,375.855
1 Total 1.0832 12.0046 5.9360 0.0141 2.0821 0.5173 2.5994 1.0033 0.4759 1.4792 0.0000 1,364.819 8 1,364.819
8 0.4414 1,375.855
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.1166 4.7733 1.3090 0.0176 0.5145 0.0348 0.5493 0.1409 0.0333 0.1742 1,994.958 3 1,994.958
3 0.1899 0.3195 2,094.926
1 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0262 0.0178 0.2450 7.4000e0040.0894 4.8000e0040.0899 0.0237 4.4000e0040.0242 75.4850 75.4850 1.8900e0031.8800e00376.0938 Total 0.1428 4.7911 1.5540 0.0184 0.6039 0.0353 0.6392 0.1646 0.0338 0.1984 2,070.443 3 2,070.443
3 0.1918 0.3214 2,171.019
9 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 25 Date: 3/28/2022 2:29 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.6863 7.0258 7.1527 0.0114 0.3719 0.3719 0.3422 0.3422 1,103.939 3 1,103.939
3 0.3570 1,112.865
2 Total 0.6863 7.0258 7.1527 0.0114 0.3719 0.3719 0.3422 0.3422 1,103.939 3 1,103.939
3 0.3570 1,112.865
2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0115 0.3264 0.1155 1.3300e0030.0448 3.0700e0030.0478 0.0129 2.9300e0030.0158 145.1958 145.1958 8.3000e0030.0208 151.6085 Worker 0.0819 0.0555 0.7656 2.3200e0030.2794 1.5100e0030.2810 0.0741 1.3900e0030.0755 235.8906 235.8906 5.9200e0035.8900e003237.7931 Total 0.0934 0.3819 0.8811 3.6500e0030.3242 4.5800e0030.3288 0.0870 4.3200e0030.0913 381.0864 381.0864 0.0142 0.0267 389.4017 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 25 Date: 3/28/2022 2:29 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.6863 7.0258 7.1527 0.0114 0.3719 0.3719 0.3422 0.3422 0.0000 1,103.939 3 1,103.939
3 0.3570 1,112.865
2 Total 0.6863 7.0258 7.1527 0.0114 0.3719 0.3719 0.3422 0.3422 0.0000 1,103.939 3 1,103.939
3 0.3570 1,112.865
2 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0115 0.3264 0.1155 1.3300e0030.0448 3.0700e0030.0478 0.0129 2.9300e0030.0158 145.1958 145.1958 8.3000e0030.0208 151.6085 Worker 0.0819 0.0555 0.7656 2.3200e0030.2794 1.5100e0030.2810 0.0741 1.3900e0030.0755 235.8906 235.8906 5.9200e0035.8900e003237.7931 Total 0.0934 0.3819 0.8811 3.6500e0030.3242 4.5800e0030.3288 0.0870 4.3200e0030.0913 381.0864 381.0864 0.0142 0.0267 389.4017 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 25 Date: 3/28/2022 2:29 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.6 Paving - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.6469 5.9174 7.0348 0.0113 0.2961 0.2961 0.2758 0.2758 1,035.824 6 1,035.824
6 0.3017 1,043.367
7 Paving 0.0943 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.7412 5.9174 7.0348 0.0113 0.2961 0.2961 0.2758 0.2758 1,035.824 6 1,035.824
6 0.3017 1,043.367
7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0590 0.0400 0.5512 1.6700e0030.2012 1.0900e0030.2023 0.0534 1.0000e0030.0544 169.8412 169.8412 4.2600e0034.2400e003171.2111 Total 0.0590 0.0400 0.5512 1.6700e0030.2012 1.0900e0030.2023 0.0534 1.0000e0030.0544 169.8412 169.8412 4.2600e0034.2400e003171.2111 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 25 Date: 3/28/2022 2:29 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.6 Paving - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.6469 5.9174 7.0348 0.0113 0.2961 0.2961 0.2758 0.2758 0.0000 1,035.824 6 1,035.824
6 0.3017 1,043.367
7 Paving 0.0943 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.7412 5.9174 7.0348 0.0113 0.2961 0.2961 0.2758 0.2758 0.0000 1,035.824 6 1,035.824
6 0.3017 1,043.367
7 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0590 0.0400 0.5512 1.6700e0030.2012 1.0900e0030.2023 0.0534 1.0000e0030.0544 169.8412 169.8412 4.2600e0034.2400e003171.2111 Total 0.0590 0.0400 0.5512 1.6700e0030.2012 1.0900e0030.2023 0.0534 1.0000e0030.0544 169.8412 169.8412 4.2600e0034.2400e003171.2111 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 25 Date: 3/28/2022 2:29 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 24.1076 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2045 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e0030.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Total 24.3121 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e0030.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0164 0.0111 0.1531 4.6000e0040.0559 3.0000e0040.0562 0.0148 2.8000e0040.0151 47.1781 47.1781 1.1800e0031.1800e00347.5586 Total 0.0164 0.0111 0.1531 4.6000e0040.0559 3.0000e0040.0562 0.0148 2.8000e0040.0151 47.1781 47.1781 1.1800e0031.1800e00347.5586 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 25 Date: 3/28/2022 2:29 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 24.1076 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2045 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e0030.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Total 24.3121 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e0030.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0164 0.0111 0.1531 4.6000e0040.0559 3.0000e0040.0562 0.0148 2.8000e0040.0151 47.1781 47.1781 1.1800e0031.1800e00347.5586 Total 0.0164 0.0111 0.1531 4.6000e0040.0559 3.0000e0040.0562 0.0148 2.8000e0040.0151 47.1781 47.1781 1.1800e0031.1800e00347.5586 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 25 Date: 3/28/2022 2:29 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 0.3127 0.3507 3.1794 7.3200e0030.8074 5.1100e0030.8125 0.2152 4.7500e0030.2200 753.1086 753.1086 0.0462 0.0315 763.6408 Unmitigated 0.3127 0.3507 3.1794 7.3200e0030.8074 5.1100e0030.8125 0.2152 4.7500e0030.2200 753.1086 753.1086 0.0462 0.0315 763.6408

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00
Condo/Townhouse High Rise 112.14 112.14 112.14 383,199 383,199 Enclosed Parking Structure 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 112.14 112.14 112.14 383,199 383,199
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Condo/Townhouse High Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 25 Date: 3/28/2022 2:29 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Enclosed Parking Structure 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0

5.0 Energy Detail

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 25 Date: 3/28/2022 2:29 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

5.9300e0030.0507 0.0216 3.2000e0044.1000e0034.1000e0034.1000e0034.1000e00364.6876 64.6876 1.2400e0031.1900e00365.0720 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

5.9300e0030.0507 0.0216 3.2000e0044.1000e0034.1000e0034.1000e0034.1000e00364.6876 64.6876 1.2400e0031.1900e00365.0720

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Condo/Townhous
e High Rise
549.844 5.9300e0030.0507 0.0216 3.2000e0044.1000e0034.1000e0034.1000e0034.1000e00364.6876 64.6876 1.2400e0031.1900e00365.0720 Enclosed Parking
Structure
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other NonAsphalt Surfaces0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 5.9300e0030.0507 0.0216 3.2000e0044.1000e0034.1000e0034.1000e0034.1000e00364.6876 64.6876 1.2400e0031.1900e00365.0720 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 25 Date: 3/28/2022 2:29 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

0.549844 5.9300e0030.0507 0.0216 3.2000e0044.1000e0034.1000e0034.1000e0034.1000e00364.6876 64.6876 1.2400e0031.1900e00365.0720 Enclosed Parking
Structure
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other NonAsphalt Surfaces0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 5.9300e0030.0507 0.0216 3.2000e0044.1000e0034.1000e0034.1000e0034.1000e00364.6876 64.6876 1.2400e0031.1900e00365.0720 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 25 Date: 3/28/2022 2:29 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 0.4447 0.0172 1.4902 8.0000e0058.2400e0038.2400e0038.2400e0038.2400e0030.0000 2.6844 2.6844 2.6000e0030.0000 2.7493 Unmitigated 0.4447 0.0172 1.4902 8.0000e0058.2400e0038.2400e0038.2400e0038.2400e0030.0000 2.6844 2.6844 2.6000e0030.0000 2.7493

0.0330 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.3665 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.0452 0.0172 1.4902 8.0000e0058.2400e0038.2400e0038.2400e0038.2400e0032.6844 2.6844 2.6000e0032.7493 Total 0.4447 0.0172 1.4902 8.0000e0058.2400e0038.2400e0038.2400e0038.2400e0030.0000 2.6844 2.6844 2.6000e0030.0000 2.7493 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 25 Date: 3/28/2022 2:29 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.0330 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.3665 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.0452 0.0172 1.4902 8.0000e0058.2400e0038.2400e0038.2400e0038.2400e0032.6844 2.6844 2.6000e0032.7493 Total 0.4447 0.0172 1.4902 8.0000e0058.2400e0038.2400e0038.2400e0038.2400e0030.0000 2.6844 2.6844 2.6000e0030.0000 2.7493 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 25 Date: 3/28/2022 2:29 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

11.0 Vegetation

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Institute Recycling and Composting Services

8.0 Waste Detail

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

CalEEMod Annual Emission Output
Anaheim Dale Avenue Project
Orange County, Annual
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - Per site plan, 18 townhouse units with 6,409 sf open space, 36 garage parking spaces, and 5 open parking spaces on 0.929 acres Grading - Per project applicant, 580 CY of cut and 105 CY of fill for net export of 475 CY Demolition - Estimated via Google Earth
Vehicle Trips - Per trip generation analysis, the project will generate 121 trips per day. As the previous use generated 9 trips per day, the net trip generation will be 112 trips per day (6.23 trips/unit/day)
Woodstoves - No hearths
Sequestration - Per Schematic Planting Plan

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
8 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 30

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
Operational Year 2023
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 33 Date: 3/28/2022 2:18 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Per Rule 403 Waste Mitigation - Per AB 341

2.0 Emissions Summary
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblFireplaces FireplaceDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblFireplaces FireplaceHourDay 3.00 0.00
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberGas 15.30 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberNoFireplace 1.80 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberWood 0.90 0.00
tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 475.00
tblSequestration NumberOfNewTrees 0.00 41.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 4.91 6.23
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 4.09 6.23
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 5.44 6.23
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 0.90 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 0.90 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 33 Date: 3/28/2022 2:18 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2022 0.1067 0.4427 0.4751 9.0000e0040.0249 0.0222 0.0471 7.6200e0030.0205 0.0281 0.0000 80.6266 80.6266 0.0193 1.6000e00381.5858 Maximum 0.1067 0.4427 0.4751 9.0000e0040.0249 0.0222 0.0471 7.6200e0030.0205 0.0281 0.0000 80.6266 80.6266 0.0193 1.6000e00381.5858 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2022 0.1067 0.4427 0.4751 9.0000e0040.0206 0.0222 0.0428 5.9000e0030.0205 0.0264 0.0000 80.6265 80.6265 0.0193 1.6000e00381.5857 Maximum 0.1067 0.4427 0.4751 9.0000e0040.0206 0.0222 0.0428 5.9000e0030.0205 0.0264 0.0000 80.6265 80.6265 0.0193 1.6000e00381.5857 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.33 0.00 9.18 22.57 0.00 6.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 33 Date: 3/28/2022 2:18 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 7-1-2022 9-30-2022 0.2780 0.2780
Highest 0.2780 0.2780

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.0786 2.1500e0030.1863 1.0000e0051.0300e0031.0300e0031.0300e0031.0300e0030.0000 0.3044 0.3044 2.9000e0040.0000 0.3118 Energy 1.0800e0039.2500e0033.9400e0036.0000e0057.5000e0047.5000e0047.5000e0047.5000e0040.0000 37.3085 37.3085 2.4500e0034.7000e00437.5094 Mobile 0.0557 0.0648 0.5829 1.3500e0030.1444 9.3000e0040.1453 0.0385 8.6000e0040.0394 0.0000 125.5346 125.5346 7.5800e0035.2300e003127.2817 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.6808 0.0000 1.6808 0.0993 0.0000 4.1640 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3721 4.1650 4.5370 0.0386 9.4000e0045.7828 Total 0.1353 0.0762 0.7731 1.4200e0030.1444 2.7100e0030.1471 0.0385 2.6400e0030.0412 2.0528 167.3125 169.3654 0.1482 6.6400e003175.0496 Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 33 Date: 3/28/2022 2:18 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.0786 2.1500e0030.1863 1.0000e0051.0300e0031.0300e0031.0300e0031.0300e0030.0000 0.3044 0.3044 2.9000e0040.0000 0.3118 Energy 1.0800e0039.2500e0033.9400e0036.0000e0057.5000e0047.5000e0047.5000e0047.5000e0040.0000 37.3085 37.3085 2.4500e0034.7000e00437.5094 Mobile 0.0557 0.0648 0.5829 1.3500e0030.1444 9.3000e0040.1453 0.0385 8.6000e0040.0394 0.0000 125.5346 125.5346 7.5800e0035.2300e003127.2817 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.4202 0.0000 0.4202 0.0248 0.0000 1.0410 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3721 4.1650 4.5370 0.0386 9.4000e0045.7828 Total 0.1353 0.0762 0.7731 1.4200e0030.1444 2.7100e0030.1471 0.0385 2.6400e0030.0412 0.7923 167.3125 168.1048 0.0737 6.6400e003171.9266 Mitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 61.41 0.00 0.74 50.26 0.00 1.78 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 33 Date: 3/28/2022 2:18 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.0 Construction Detail

2.3 Vegetation
CO2e
Category MT
New Trees 29.0280
Total 29.0280
Vegetation
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 7/1/2022 7/14/2022 5 10
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 7/15/2022 7/15/2022 5 1 3 Grading Grading 7/16/2022 7/19/2022 5 2
4 Building Construction Building Construction 7/20/2022 12/6/2022 5 100 5 Paving Paving 12/7/2022 12/13/2022 5 5
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 12/14/2022 12/20/2022 5 5 Residential Indoor: 36,450; Residential Outdoor: 12,150; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 1,706 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0.5
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 1.5
Acres of Paving: 0.65
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 33 Date: 3/28/2022 2:18 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 247 0.40
Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37
Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Graders 1 6.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 6.00 247 0.40
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 4.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 2 6.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 4 6.00 9 0.56
Paving Pavers 1 7.00 130 0.42
Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.38
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 4 10.00 0.00 14.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 2 5.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 3 8.00 0.00 59.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 5 25.00 7.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 5.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 33 Date: 3/28/2022 2:18 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 1.4800e0030.0000 1.4800e0032.2000e0040.0000 2.2000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.5500e0030.0321 0.0374 6.0000e0051.6900e0031.6900e0031.6100e0031.6100e0030.0000 5.2068 5.2068 9.6000e0040.0000 5.2308 Total 3.5500e0030.0321 0.0374 6.0000e0051.4800e0031.6900e0033.1700e0032.2000e0041.6100e0031.8300e0030.0000 5.2068 5.2068 9.6000e0040.0000 5.2308 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Water Exposed Area
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 33 Date: 3/28/2022 2:18 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 3.0000e0051.1500e0033.1000e0040.0000 1.2000e0041.0000e0051.3000e0043.0000e0051.0000e0054.0000e0050.0000 0.4294 0.4294 4.0000e0057.0000e0050.4509 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.5000e0041.1000e0041.5700e0030.0000 5.5000e0040.0000 5.5000e0041.5000e0040.0000 1.5000e0040.0000 0.4338 0.4338 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.4373 Total 1.8000e0041.2600e0031.8800e0030.0000 6.7000e0041.0000e0056.8000e0041.8000e0041.0000e0051.9000e0040.0000 0.8632 0.8632 5.0000e0058.0000e0050.8882 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 5.8000e0040.0000 5.8000e0049.0000e0050.0000 9.0000e0050.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.5500e0030.0321 0.0374 6.0000e0051.6900e0031.6900e0031.6100e0031.6100e0030.0000 5.2068 5.2068 9.6000e0040.0000 5.2308 Total 3.5500e0030.0321 0.0374 6.0000e0055.8000e0041.6900e0032.2700e0039.0000e0051.6100e0031.7000e0030.0000 5.2068 5.2068 9.6000e0040.0000 5.2308 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 33 Date: 3/28/2022 2:18 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.0000e0051.0000e0058.0000e0050.0000 3.0000e0050.0000 3.0000e0051.0000e0050.0000 1.0000e0050.0000 0.0217 0.0217 0.0000 0.0000 0.0219 Total 1.0000e0051.0000e0058.0000e0050.0000 3.0000e0050.0000 3.0000e0051.0000e0050.0000 1.0000e0050.0000 0.0217 0.0217 0.0000 0.0000 0.0219 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 1.0000e0040.0000 1.0000e0041.0000e0050.0000 1.0000e0050.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.9000e0043.4700e0031.9800e0030.0000 1.3000e0041.3000e0041.2000e0041.2000e0040.0000 0.4275 0.4275 1.4000e0040.0000 0.4310 Total 2.9000e0043.4700e0031.9800e0030.0000 1.0000e0041.3000e0042.3000e0041.0000e0051.2000e0041.3000e0040.0000 0.4275 0.4275 1.4000e0040.0000 0.4310 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 33 Date: 3/28/2022 2:18 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 5.3400e0030.0000 5.3400e0032.5700e0030.0000 2.5700e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.0800e0030.0120 5.9400e0031.0000e0055.2000e0045.2000e0044.8000e0044.8000e0040.0000 1.2381 1.2381 4.0000e0040.0000 1.2482 Total 1.0800e0030.0120 5.9400e0031.0000e0055.3400e0035.2000e0045.8600e0032.5700e0034.8000e0043.0500e0030.0000 1.2381 1.2381 4.0000e0040.0000 1.2482 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 33 Date: 3/28/2022 2:18 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 1.2000e0044.8300e0031.3000e0032.0000e0055.1000e0043.0000e0055.4000e0041.4000e0043.0000e0051.7000e0040.0000 1.8096 1.8096 1.7000e0042.9000e0041.9002 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.5000e0040.0000 9.0000e0050.0000 9.0000e0052.0000e0050.0000 2.0000e0050.0000 0.0694 0.0694 0.0000 0.0000 0.0700 Total 1.4000e0044.8500e0031.5500e0032.0000e0056.0000e0043.0000e0056.3000e0041.6000e0043.0000e0051.9000e0040.0000 1.8790 1.8790 1.7000e0042.9000e0041.9702 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 2.0800e0030.0000 2.0800e0031.0000e0030.0000 1.0000e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.0800e0030.0120 5.9400e0031.0000e0055.2000e0045.2000e0044.8000e0044.8000e0040.0000 1.2381 1.2381 4.0000e0040.0000 1.2482 Total 1.0800e0030.0120 5.9400e0031.0000e0052.0800e0035.2000e0042.6000e0031.0000e0034.8000e0041.4800e0030.0000 1.2381 1.2381 4.0000e0040.0000 1.2482 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 33 Date: 3/28/2022 2:18 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0343 0.3513 0.3576 5.7000e0040.0186 0.0186 0.0171 0.0171 0.0000 50.0739 50.0739 0.0162 0.0000 50.4787 Total 0.0343 0.3513 0.3576 5.7000e0040.0186 0.0186 0.0171 0.0171 0.0000 50.0739 50.0739 0.0162 0.0000 50.4787 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 33 Date: 3/28/2022 2:18 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 5.8000e0040.0165 5.6700e0037.0000e0052.2100e0031.5000e0042.3600e0036.4000e0041.5000e0047.8000e0040.0000 6.5848 6.5848 3.8000e0049.4000e0046.8756 Worker 3.7700e0032.8300e0030.0392 1.2000e0040.0137 8.0000e0050.0138 3.6400e0037.0000e0053.7100e0030.0000 10.8452 10.8452 2.7000e0042.7000e00410.9327 Total 4.3500e0030.0193 0.0448 1.9000e0040.0159 2.3000e0040.0162 4.2800e0032.2000e0044.4900e0030.0000 17.4300 17.4300 6.5000e0041.2100e00317.8083 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0343 0.3513 0.3576 5.7000e0040.0186 0.0186 0.0171 0.0171 0.0000 50.0738 50.0738 0.0162 0.0000 50.4787 Total 0.0343 0.3513 0.3576 5.7000e0040.0186 0.0186 0.0171 0.0171 0.0000 50.0738 50.0738 0.0162 0.0000 50.4787 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 33 Date: 3/28/2022 2:18 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.6 Paving - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 1.6200e0030.0148 0.0176 3.0000e0057.4000e0047.4000e0046.9000e0046.9000e0040.0000 2.3492 2.3492 6.8000e0040.0000 2.3663 Paving 2.4000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.8600e0030.0148 0.0176 3.0000e0057.4000e0047.4000e0046.9000e0046.9000e0040.0000 2.3492 2.3492 6.8000e0040.0000 2.3663 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 33 Date: 3/28/2022 2:18 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.6 Paving - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.4000e0041.0000e0041.4100e0030.0000 4.9000e0040.0000 5.0000e0041.3000e0040.0000 1.3000e0040.0000 0.3904 0.3904 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.3936 Total 1.4000e0041.0000e0041.4100e0030.0000 4.9000e0040.0000 5.0000e0041.3000e0040.0000 1.3000e0040.0000 0.3904 0.3904 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.3936 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 1.6200e0030.0148 0.0176 3.0000e0057.4000e0047.4000e0046.9000e0046.9000e0040.0000 2.3492 2.3492 6.8000e0040.0000 2.3663 Paving 2.4000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.8600e0030.0148 0.0176 3.0000e0057.4000e0047.4000e0046.9000e0046.9000e0040.0000 2.3492 2.3492 6.8000e0040.0000 2.3663 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 33 Date: 3/28/2022 2:18 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.0000e0053.0000e0053.9000e0040.0000 1.4000e0040.0000 1.4000e0044.0000e0050.0000 4.0000e0050.0000 0.1085 0.1085 0.0000 0.0000 0.1093 Total 4.0000e0053.0000e0053.9000e0040.0000 1.4000e0040.0000 1.4000e0044.0000e0050.0000 4.0000e0050.0000 0.1085 0.1085 0.0000 0.0000 0.1093 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.0603 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 5.1000e0043.5200e0034.5300e0031.0000e0052.0000e0042.0000e0042.0000e0042.0000e0040.0000 0.6383 0.6383 4.0000e0050.0000 0.6394 Total 0.0608 3.5200e0034.5300e0031.0000e0052.0000e0042.0000e0042.0000e0042.0000e0040.0000 0.6383 0.6383 4.0000e0050.0000 0.6394 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 33 Date: 3/28/2022 2:18 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 33 Date: 3/28/2022 2:18 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.0557 0.0648 0.5829 1.3500e0030.1444 9.3000e0040.1453 0.0385 8.6000e0040.0394 0.0000 125.5346 125.5346 7.5800e0035.2300e003127.2817 Unmitigated 0.0557 0.0648 0.5829 1.3500e0030.1444 9.3000e0040.1453 0.0385 8.6000e0040.0394 0.0000 125.5346 125.5346 7.5800e0035.2300e003127.2817

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.4 Fleet Mix
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 33 Date: 3/28/2022 2:18 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Condo/Townhouse High Rise 0.544795 0.058861 0.186903 0.129401 0.024381 0.006522 0.014242 0.004855 0.000656 0.000385 0.024332 0.000723 0.003942 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.544795 0.058861 0.186903 0.129401 0.024381 0.006522 0.014242 0.004855 0.000656 0.000385 0.024332 0.000723 0.003942 Enclosed Parking Structure 0.544795 0.058861 0.186903 0.129401 0.024381 0.006522 0.014242 0.004855 0.000656 0.000385 0.024332 0.000723 0.003942 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.544795 0.058861 0.186903 0.129401 0.024381 0.006522 0.014242 0.004855 0.000656 0.000385 0.024332 0.000723 0.003942 Parking Lot 0.544795 0.058861 0.186903 0.129401 0.024381 0.006522 0.014242 0.004855 0.000656 0.000385 0.024332 0.000723 0.003942

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 26.5988 26.5988 2.2500e0032.7000e00426.7360 Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 26.5988 26.5988 2.2500e0032.7000e00426.7360 NaturalGas
Mitigated

1.0800e0039.2500e0033.9400e0036.0000e0057.5000e0047.5000e0047.5000e0047.5000e0040.0000 10.7098 10.7098 2.1000e0042.0000e00410.7734 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

1.0800e0039.2500e0033.9400e0036.0000e0057.5000e0047.5000e0047.5000e0047.5000e0040.0000 10.7098 10.7098 2.1000e0042.0000e00410.7734

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 33 Date: 3/28/2022 2:18 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Condo/Townhous
e High Rise
200693 1.0800e0039.2500e0033.9400e0036.0000e0057.5000e0047.5000e0047.5000e0047.5000e0040.0000 10.7098 10.7098 2.1000e0042.0000e00410.7734 Enclosed Parking
Structure
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other NonAsphalt Surfaces0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.0800e0039.2500e0033.9400e0036.0000e0057.5000e0047.5000e0047.5000e0047.5000e0040.0000 10.7098 10.7098 2.1000e0042.0000e00410.7734 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 33 Date: 3/28/2022 2:18 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Condo/Townhous
e High Rise
200693 1.0800e0039.2500e0033.9400e0036.0000e0057.5000e0047.5000e0047.5000e0047.5000e0040.0000 10.7098 10.7098 2.1000e0042.0000e00410.7734 Enclosed Parking
Structure
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other NonAsphalt Surfaces0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.0800e0039.2500e0033.9400e0036.0000e0057.5000e0047.5000e0047.5000e0047.5000e0040.0000 10.7098 10.7098 2.1000e0042.0000e00410.7734 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 33 Date: 3/28/2022 2:18 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Condo/Townhous
e High Rise
73682.8 13.0673 1.1000e0031.3000e00413.1347
Enclosed Parking
Structure
75600 13.4073 1.1300e0031.4000e00413.4765
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Other NonAsphalt Surfaces0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 700 0.1241 1.0000e0050.0000 0.1248
Total 26.5988 2.2400e0032.7000e00426.7360
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 33 Date: 3/28/2022 2:18 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.0786 2.1500e0030.1863 1.0000e0051.0300e0031.0300e0031.0300e0031.0300e0030.0000 0.3044 0.3044 2.9000e0040.0000 0.3118 Unmitigated 0.0786 2.1500e0030.1863 1.0000e0051.0300e0031.0300e0031.0300e0031.0300e0030.0000 0.3044 0.3044 2.9000e0040.0000 0.3118

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

6.0300e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.0669 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 5.6500e0032.1500e0030.1863 1.0000e0051.0300e0031.0300e0031.0300e0031.0300e0030.0000 0.3044 0.3044 2.9000e0040.0000 0.3118 Total 0.0786 2.1500e0030.1863 1.0000e0051.0300e0031.0300e0031.0300e0031.0300e0030.0000 0.3044 0.3044 2.9000e0040.0000 0.3118 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 33 Date: 3/28/2022 2:18 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

6.0300e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.0669 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 5.6500e0032.1500e0030.1863 1.0000e0051.0300e0031.0300e0031.0300e0031.0300e0030.0000 0.3044 0.3044 2.9000e0040.0000 0.3118 Total 0.0786 2.1500e0030.1863 1.0000e0051.0300e0031.0300e0031.0300e0031.0300e0030.0000 0.3044 0.3044 2.9000e0040.0000 0.3118 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 33 Date: 3/28/2022 2:18 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 4.5370 0.0386 9.4000e0045.7828
Unmitigated 4.5370 0.0386 9.4000e0045.7828

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Condo/Townhous
e High Rise

1.17277 /

0.739357

4.5370 0.0386 9.4000e0045.7828
Enclosed Parking
Structure
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Other NonAsphalt Surfaces0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 4.5370 0.0386 9.4000e0045.7828
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 29 of 33 Date: 3/28/2022 2:18 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Condo/Townhous
e High Rise

1.17277 /

0.739357

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Institute Recycling and Composting Services

8.0 Waste Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 30 of 33 Date: 3/28/2022 2:18 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 0.4202 0.0248 0.0000 1.0410
Unmitigated 1.6808 0.0993 0.0000 4.1640
Category/Year

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Condo/Townhous
e High Rise

8.28 1.6808 0.0993 0.0000 4.1640
Enclosed Parking
Structure
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Other NonAsphalt Surfaces0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 1.6808 0.0993 0.0000 4.1640
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 31 of 33 Date: 3/28/2022 2:18 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Condo/Townhous
e High Rise

2.07 0.4202 0.0248 0.0000 1.0410
Enclosed Parking
Structure
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Other NonAsphalt Surfaces0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.4202 0.0248 0.0000 1.0410
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 32 of 33 Date: 3/28/2022 2:18 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

11.0 Vegetation
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT
Unmitigated 29.0280 0.0000 0.0000 29.0280

11.2 Net New Trees
Number of
Trees
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT
Miscellaneous 41 29.0280 0.0000 0.0000 29.0280
Total 29.0280 0.0000 0.0000 29.0280
Species Class
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 33 of 33 Date: 3/28/2022 2:18 PM Anaheim Dale Avenue Project - Orange County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Appendix C:

EMFAC 2017 Output
Calendar Year: 2022
Season: AnnualVehicle Classification: EMFAC2007 CategoriesUnits: miles/day for VMT, trips/day for Trips, tons/day for Emissions, 1000 gallons/day for Fuel ConsumptionRegion Calendar Year Vehicle Category Model Year Speed Fuel Population Trips Fuel Consumption Fuel Consumption Total Fuel Consumption VMT Total VMT Miles Per Gallon Vehicle ClassSouth Coast AQMD 2022 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 77.82251 1557.073 1.914672095 1914.672095 1984478.157 7970.981 13381402.09 6.74 HHDSouth Coast AQMD 2022 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 108362 1118617 1982.563485 1982563.485 13373431South Coast AQMD 2022 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 6542832 30915701 8178.144259 8178144.259 8226568.36 2.52E+08 254602375.4 30.95 LDASouth Coast AQMD 2022 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 58937.5 279973.4 48.42410045 48424.10045 2358230South Coast AQMD 2022 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 127532.6 637025.4 0 0 5177709South Coast AQMD 2022 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 736905.6 3399512 1031.447408 1031447.408 1031847.287 27300896 27309932.68 26.47 LDT1South Coast AQMD 2022 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 387.1571 1348.408 0.39987912 399.8791198 9037.122South Coast AQMD 2022 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 5339.042 26794.47 0 0 221507.4South Coast AQMD 2022 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 2246303 10535910 3436.155557 3436155.557 3453207.618 84740129 85348125.78 24.72 LDT2South Coast AQMD 2022 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 14234.59 70193.22 17.05206088 17052.06088 607996.5South Coast AQMD 2022 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 22589.96 114302.6 0 0 734756.1South Coast AQMD 2022 LHDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 175903.1 2620694 598.0685493 598068.5493 821513.5103 6298251 11115258.37 13.53 LHDT1South Coast AQMD 2022 LHDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 119380.7 1501659 223.444961 223444.961 4817007South Coast AQMD 2022 LHDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 30009.92 447103.1 113.5150695 113515.0695 209067.0531 1040649 2902289.397 13.88 LHDT2South Coast AQMD 2022 LHDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 47335.63 595422.7 95.55198358 95551.98358 1861640South Coast AQMD 2022 MCY Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 295960.1 591920.2 56.92214589 56922.14589 56922.14589 2072370 2072370.126 36.41 MCYSouth Coast AQMD 2022 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 1579640 7302407 2793.799561 2793799.561 2842944.316 55888916 57233722.8 20.13 MDVSouth Coast AQMD 2022 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 33348.92 163526.3 49.14475473 49144.75473 1344806South Coast AQMD 2022 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 11658.48 59625.3 0 0 391944.3South Coast AQMD 2022 MH Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 35097.75 3511.179 64.70410395 64704.10395 76270.38211 333282.4 455641.5746 5.97 MHSouth Coast AQMD 2022 MH Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 12758.81 1275.881 11.56627815 11566.27815 122359.2South Coast AQMD 2022 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 25445.41 509111.8 269.2842176 269284.2176 1009568.488 1367743 9307083.084 9.22 MHDTSouth Coast AQMD 2022 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 123310 1231988 740.28427 740284.27 7939340South Coast AQMD 2022 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 5959.443 119236.5 49.67589796 49675.89796 88138.04214 250653.5 576603.5972 6.54 OBUSSouth Coast AQMD 2022 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 4274.499 41607.39 38.46214418 38462.14418 325950.1South Coast AQMD 2022 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 2630.829 10523.32 11.7605267 11760.5267 39328.1885 107369.8 316915.9173 8.06 SBUSSouth Coast AQMD 2022 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 6631.313 76524.43 27.5676618 27567.6618 209546.1South Coast AQMD 2022 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 952.146 3808.584 18.40085629 18400.85629 18647.65249 89256 90734.08386 4.87 UBUSSouth Coast AQMD 2022 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 14.14142 56.56567 0.246796198 246.7961984 1478.086South Coast AQMD 2022 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 17.11694 68.46776 0 1343.185 Source: EMFAC2017 (v1.0.3) Emissions Inventory
Region Type: Air DistrictRegion: South Coast AQMDCalendar Year: 2023Season: AnnualVehicle Classification: EMFAC2007 CategoriesUnits: miles/day for VMT, trips/day for Trips, tons/day for Emissions, 1000 gallons/day for Fuel ConsumptionRegion Calendar Year Vehicle Category Model Year Speed Fuel Population VMT Trips Fuel Consumption Fuel Consumption Total Fuel Consumption VMT Total VMT Miles Per Gallon Vehicle ClassSouth Coast AQMD2023 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 75.10442936 8265.097 1502.689 1.936286145 1936.286145 1913466.474 8265.097 13656273.03 7.14 HHDSouth Coast AQMD2023 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 109818.6753 13648008 1133618 1911.530188 1911530.188 13648008South Coast AQMD2023 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 6635002.295 2.53E+08 31352477 7971.24403 7971244.03 8020635.698 2.53E+08 255180358.3 31.82 LDASouth Coast AQMD2023 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 62492.97958 2469816 297086.6 49.3916685 49391.6685 2469816South Coast AQMD2023 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 150700.3971 6237106 751566 0 0 6237106South Coast AQMD2023 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 758467.6481 27812996 3504563 1023.913006 1023913.006 1024279.466 27812996 27821405.09 27.16 LDT1South Coast AQMD2023 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 360.7799144 8408.618 1256.88 0.366459477 366.4594769 8408.618South Coast AQMD2023 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 7122.93373 303507.5 35798.19 0 0 303507.5South Coast AQMD2023 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 2285150.139 85272416 10723315 3338.798312 3338798.312 3356536.438 85272416 85922778.34 25.60 LDT2South Coast AQMD2023 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 15594.68309 650362.8 76635.83 17.73812611 17738.12611 650362.8South Coast AQMD2023 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 28809.63735 917592.8 145405.4 0 0 917592.8South Coast AQMD2023 LHDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 174910.3847 6216643 2605904 583.3851736 583385.1736 811563.1022 6216643 11211395.79 13.81 LHDT1South Coast AQMD2023 LHDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 125545.0822 4994753 1579199 228.1779285 228177.9285 4994753South Coast AQMD2023 LHDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 30102.75324 1034569 448486.2 111.5753864 111575.3864 209423.5025 1034569 2969599.008 14.18 LHDT2South Coast AQMD2023 LHDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 50003.13116 1935030 628976.5 97.84811618 97848.11618 1935030South Coast AQMD2023 MCY Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 305044.5141 2104624 610089 57.849018 57849.018 57849.018 2104624 2104623.657 36.38 MCYSouth Coast AQMD2023 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 1589862.703 55684188 7354860 2693.883526 2693883.526 2744536.341 55684188 57109879.73 20.81 MDVSouth Coast AQMD2023 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 36128.1019 1425691 176566.9 50.65281491 50652.81491 1425691South Coast AQMD2023 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 16376.67653 537591.7 83475.95 0 0 537591.7South Coast AQMD2023 MH Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 34679.50542 330042.9 3469.338 63.26295123 63262.95123 74893.26955 330042.9 454344.9436 6.07 MHSouth Coast AQMD2023 MH Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 13122.69387 124302 1312.269 11.63031832 11630.31832 124302South Coast AQMD2023 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 25624.3151 1363694 512691.3 265.2060557 265206.0557 989975.6425 1363694 9484317.768 9.58 MHDTSouth Coast AQMD2023 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 122124.488 8120623 1221858 724.7695868 724769.5868 8120623South Coast AQMD2023 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 5955.291639 245774 119153.5 48.07750689 48077.50689 86265.88761 245774 579743.8353 6.72 OBUSSouth Coast AQMD2023 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 4286.940093 333969.8 41558.29 38.18838072 38188.38072 333969.8South Coast AQMD2023 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 2783.643068 112189.6 11134.57 12.19474692 12194.74692 39638.85935 112189.6 323043.5203 8.15 SBUSSouth Coast AQMD2023 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 6671.825716 210853.9 76991.94 27.44411242 27444.11242 210853.9South Coast AQMD2023 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 957.7686184 89782.63 3831.074 17.62416327 17624.16327 17863.66378 89782.63 91199.2533 5.11 UBUSSouth Coast AQMD2023 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 13.00046095 1416.622 52.00184 0.239500509 239.5005093 1416.622South Coast AQMD2023 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 16.11693886 1320.163 64.46776 0 1320.163 APPENDIX F.1

PRELIMINARY WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN
Appendix F.1 Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan
OTH2021-01399
County of Orange/Santa Ana Region
Priority Project
Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan
(PWQMP)
Project Name:
1442 N Dale Avenue
Anaheim, CA 92802
Prepared for:

BONANNI DEVELOPMENT, INC.
5500 Bolsa Avenue, Suite 120
Huntington Beach, CA 92649
Ed Bonanni
(714) 892-0123
Prepared by:

Walden & Associates
Engineer ___Marcos F. Padilla__ Registration No._80426_ 2552 White Road, Suite B
Irvine, CA 92614-6236
(949) 660-0110
JN: 2073-573-001
Prepared: 8/10/21/ Revised: 11/11/21, 1/5/22, 3/11/22, 4/11/22 and 4/21/2022 Condition 1
The prelim wqmp is conditionally approved and subject to further review during final engineering. Final determination of infiltration feasibility has not been determined. During final engineer a site specific infiltration test shall be conducted. Additional coordination with OCWD and review of calculation shall conducted to determine appropriate BMPs. 4/26/2022, 8:36:46 PM
ANAH-OTH2021-01399
Cesar Morales
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
DALE

BONANNI DEVELOPMENT, INC Owner’s Certification
2073 Preliminary WQMP Option.docx Page 2
Project Owner’s Certification
Permit/Application No. OTH-2021-01399 Grading Permit No.

Tract/Parcel Map No. TTM 19177 Building Permit No.

CUP, SUP, and/or APN (Specify Lot Numbers if Portions of Tract) APN: 070-741-01 This Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) has been prepared for BONANNI DEVELOPMENT, INC. by Walden & Associates. The PWQMP is intended to comply with the requirements of the local NPDES Stormwater Program requiring the preparation of the plan.

The undersigned, while it owns the subject property, is responsible for the implementation of the provisions of this plan , including the ongoing operation and maintenance of all best management practices (BMPs), and will ensure that this plan is amended as appropriate to reflect up-to-date conditions on the site consistent with the current Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP) and the intent of the non-point source NPDES Permit for Waste Discharge Requirements for the County of Orange, Orange County Flood Control District and the incorporated Cities of Orange County within the Santa Ana Region. Once the undersigned transfers its interest in the property, its successors-in-interest shall bear the aforementioned responsibility to implement and amend the WQMP. An appropriate number of approved and signed copies of this document shall be available on the subject site in perpetuity.

Owner: Ed Bonanni
Title
Company Bonanni Development, Inc.

Address 5500 Bolsa Avenue, Suite 120
Email [email protected]
Telephone # (714) 892-0123
Signature Date

Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
DALE

BONANNI DEVELOPMENT, INC Contents
2073 Preliminary WQMP.docx
Contents Page No.

Section I Permit(s) and Water Quality Conditions of Approval or Issuance………..3 Section II Project Description .................................................................................. 4 Section III Site Description ........................................................................................ 8 Section IV Best Management Practices (BMPs) ...................................................... 10 Section V Inspection/Maintenance Responsibility for BMPs ................................. 28 Section VI BMP Exhibit (Site Plan) .......................................................................... 31 Section VII Educational Materials ............................................................................. 32 Attachments:

Attachment A – Calculations, Worksheets, and Cross-Sections – Calculations shall follow City of Anaheim BMP Sizing Worksheets
Attachment B – 2-Year Storm Event Hydrology Calculations, (N/A) Attachment C – O+M Plan
Attachment D – Educational Materials (Include Reference/Link Only) Attachment E – Geotechnical Report
Attachment F – Notice of Transfer of Responsibility Form Attachment G – City of Anaheim Correspondence, if Applicable Attachment H (Optional) – Any Additional Pertinent Appendices Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
DALE

BONANNI DEVELOPMENT, INC Section I
2073 Preliminary WQMP Option.docx Page 3
Section I Discretionary Permit(s) and
Water Quality Conditions
Project Infomation
Permit/Application No. OTH-2021-01399 Tract/Parcel Map No. TTM 19177 Additional Information/
Comments:
1442 N Dale Avenue
Water Quality Conditions/Conceptual WQMP
Water Quality
Conditions
(list verbatim)
Prior to the issuance by the City of Anaheim of a grading permit, building permit and/or conditional use permit for any new development or significant redevelopment, the property owner shall submit to and obtain the approval of the Public Works Department of a water quality management plan. If the new development or significant redevelopment will be approved without application for a grading permit, building permit or conditional use permit, the property owner shall submit to and obtain the approval of the Public Works Department of a water quality management plan prior to the issuance of a discretionary land use approval or, at the City's discretion, prior to recordation of a subdivision map.

The current site is not covered under and existing or Master WQMP.

Watershed-Based Plan Conditions
Provide applicable
conditions from watershed
- based plans including
WIHMPs and TMDLS.

Runoff from the project drains to Coyote Creek, which has an adopted TMDL, TMDL for Metals and Selenium San Gabriel River and Impaired Tributaries.

Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
DALE

BONANNI DEVELOPMENT, INC Section II
2073 Preliminary WQMP Option.docx Page 4
Section II Project Description
II.1 Project Description
Description of Proposed Project
Development Category
(Verbatim from WQMP):

All significant redevelopment projects, where significant redevelopment is defined as the addition of 5,000 or more square feet of impervious surface on an already developed site, and the existing development or redevelopment project falls under another Priority Project Category.

If the redevelopment results in the addition or replacement of less than 50 percent of the impervious area on-site and the existing development was not subject to WQMP requirement, the numeric sizing criteria only applies to the addition or replacement area. If the addition or replacement accounts for 50 percent of more of the impervious area, the Project WQMP requirements apply to the entire development.

Project Area (ft2): 0.93 Number of Dwelling Units: 18 SIC Code: Residential Project Area: 0.93ac Pervious Impervious
Area (acres) Percentage Area (acres) Percentage
Pre-Project Conditions 0.82 88 0.11 12
Post-Project Conditions 0.15 16 0.78 84
Drainage
Patterns/Connections
The existing site is a residential lot and surface drains northwesterly onto a private alley v-gutter and continues westerly into a public catch basin at the end of the cul-de-sac at Dale Street. The runoff surface flows southwesterly to Coyote Creek Channel and ultimately to the Pacific Ocean.

At project completion the surface drainage will sheet flow to a v-gutter flowing to grated inlets which connect to the onsite storm drain system.

The onsite storm drain leaves the site at a location west of the dwellings, and will be treated by a pre-treated sub-surface infiltration system or a biofiltration system (Bioclean Modular Wetland) prior to overflowing or pumped into a parkway drain and onto the private alley.

Narrative Project
Description:

The proposed development is a residential project located at 1442 Dale Avenue in the City of Anaheim. The site is currently a developed property located between Artesia Freeway and Peppertree Dr. The site is currently graded and surface drains into a private alley. The site is surrounded by a Freeway to the north, to the west and east by Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
DALE

BONANNI DEVELOPMENT, INC Section II
2073 Preliminary WQMP Option.docx Page 5
residential units and to the south by Peppertree Drive. The project proposes to construct 18 two story dwelling units varying in size from 2,000 SF to 2,400 SF, a private street and open spaces. The proposed landscaping consists of drought tolerant material, some of which will be native. Yard drains and perimeter drains are located throughout the site.

An infiltration test will be provided with the Final WQMP, for this report both infiltration and biofiltration will be provided as options.

II.2 Potential Stormwater Pollutants
Pollutants of Concern
Pollutant
Circle One:

E=Expected to
be of concern
N=Not Expected
to be of concern
Additional Information and Comments
Suspended-Solid/ Sediment E N Driveways, rooftops and sidewalks Nutrients E N Fertilizers, Food waste
Heavy Metals E N Cars
Pathogens (Bacteria/Virus) E N Wild bird and pet waste, garbage Pesticides E N Landscape Areas
Oil and Grease E N Leaking vehicles
Toxic Organic Compounds E N Cars, Fertilizers
Trash and Debris E N Poorly managed trash container and parking lot Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
DALE

BONANNI DEVELOPMENT, INC Section II
2073 Preliminary WQMP Option.docx Page 6
II.3 Hydrologic Conditions of Concern
No – Show map
Yes – Describe applicable hydrologic conditions of concern below.

See Attached map.

Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
DALE

BONANNI DEVELOPMENT, INC Section II
2073 Preliminary WQMP Option.docx Page 7
II.4 Post Development Drainage Characteristics
At project completion the surface drainage will sheet flow to a v-gutter flowing to grated inlets which connect to the onsite storm drain system. The onsite storm drain leaves the site at a location west of the dwellings, and will be treated by a pre-treated sub-surface infiltration system or a biofiltration system (Bioclean Modular Wetland) prior to overflowing or pumped into a parkway drain and onto the private alley. The flow will discharge onto a private alley v-gutter and continues westerly into a public catch basin at the end of the cul-de-sac at Dale Street. The runoff surface flows southwesterly to Coyote Creek Channel and ultimately to the Pacific Ocean.

II.5 Property Ownership/Management
Ownership of the project will be held with Bonanni Development, Inc until a Home Owners Association (HOA) is established. Long term maintenance will be the responsibility of the (HOA).

Bonanni Development, Inc.
5500 Bolsa Ave. Suite 120
Huntington Beach, CA 92649
Ed Bonanni
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
DALE

BONANNI DEVELOPMENT, INC Section II
2073 Preliminary WQMP Option.docx Page 8
Section III Site Description
III.1 Physical Setting
Planning Area/
Community Name Dale
Location/Address
1442 N Dale Avenue
Anaheim
Land Use Housing
Zoning Public Recreation
Acreage 0.93
Predominant Soil Type Sandy lean Clay with Silt, Clayey Sand III.2 Site Characteristics
Precipitation Zone 0.95”
Topography Developed open yard with a gentle slope towards the northwest.

Drainage
Patterns/Connections
The project is located within the San Gabriel-Coyote Creek Watershed. The development area drains to Carbon Canyon Creek, then Coyote Creek, then San Gabriel River and ultimately out to the San Pedro Bay (Pacific Ocean).

Soil Type, Geology, and
Infiltration Properties
Class B Soil Type, with layers of clay. No soil contamination has been previously reported. Infiltration rate based on assumed minimum rate of 0.3 in/hr, Final WQMP to provide infiltration test.

Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
DALE

BONANNI DEVELOPMENT, INC Section II
2073 Preliminary WQMP Option.docx Page 9
Site Characteristics (continued)
Hydrogeologic
(Groundwater)
Conditions
The project is not located in plume protection boundary nor is identified as natural pollution source area or contaminated site. The Geotracker indicates that the property is not located within 250 feet of any closed leaky underground storage tanks (LUST) cleanup site.

Geotechnical Conditions
(relevant to infiltration)
Existing septic system and water well to be abandoned and clay layers. Historical ground water table at 18 feet below finished surface. 0.3 in/hr (minimum assumed)
Off-Site Drainage
The project does not receive offsite run-on from Interstate off-ramp right-of-way, located north of the property. There is an existing curb/berm and swale.

Utility and Infrastructure
Information Existing water well and septic system
III.3 Watershed Description
Receiving Waters San-Gabriel-Coyote Creek Watershed
303(d) Listed Impairments
Coyote Creek Channel - Copper (dissolved), pH, toxicity, indicator bacteria, malathion, and iron
San Gabriel River Reach 1 – temperature and pH
San Gabriel River Estuary – Nickel, Oxygen (dissolved), copper, dioxin, and indicator bacteria
Applicable TMDLs
Heavy Metals (Technical TMDL1)
1 This TMDL has been adopted for Coyote Creek/San Gabriel River by the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (Region 4); however it applies to the areas of Orange County that drain to Coyote Creek and San Gabriel River.

Pollutants of Concern for
the Project
Suspended-Solid/Sediment, Nutrients, Heavy Metals, Pathogens (Bacteria/Virus), Pesticides, Oil and Grease, Toxic Organic Compounds, Trash and Debris.

Environmentally Sensitive
and Special Biological
Significant Areas
None within project’s vicinity
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
DALE

BONANNI DEVELOPMENT, INC Section IV
2073 Preliminary WQMP Option.docx Page 10
Section IV Best Management Practices (BMPs)
IV. 1 Project Performance Criteria
(NOC Permit Area only) Is there an approved WIHMP or equivalent for the project area that includes more stringent LID feasibility criteria or if there are opportunities identified for implementing LID on regional or sub-regional basis?
YES NO
If yes, describe WIHMP
feasibility criteria or
regional/sub-regional LID
opportunities.

Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
DALE

BONANNI DEVELOPMENT, INC Section IV
2073 Preliminary WQMP Option.docx Page 11
Project Performance Criteria (continued)
If HCOC exists, list
applicable
hydromodification control
performance criteria
The evaluation of potential impacts is based on the following for a two-year frequency storm event:
 Increases in runoff volume;
 Changes in time of concentration;
 Potential for increase in post-development downstream erosions: and,
 Potential for adverse downstream impacts of physical
structure, aquatic and riparian habitat.

If a hydrologic condition of concern (HCOC) exist, priority projects shall implement on-site or regional hydromodification controls such that:
 Post-development runoff volume for the two-year
frequency storm does not exceed that of the predevelopment condition by more the five percent, and; Time of concentration of post-development runoff for the twoyear storm event is not less than that for the pre-development condition by more than five percent.

List applicable LID
performance criteria
Priority projects must infiltrate, harvest and use, evapotranspire, or biotreat/biofilter the 85th percentile, 24-hour storm event (Design Capture Volume).

A properly designed biotreatment system may only be considered if infiltration, harvest and use, and evapotranspiration (ET) cannot be feasibly implemented for the full design capture volume. In this case, infiltration, harvest and use, and ET practices must be implemented to the greatest extent feasible and biotreatment may be provided for the remaining design capture volume.

List applicable treatment
control BMP performance
criteria
If it is not feasible to meet LID performance criteria through retention and/or biotreatment provided on-site or at a subregional/regional scale, then treatment control BMPs shall be provided on-site or offsite prior to discharge to water of the US.

Calculate LID design storm
capture volume for Project.

Area = 0.93 acres (tributary)
Impervious Area percentage = 84%
C = (0.75 x imp) + 0.15 = 0.78
I = 0.95 (Figure III.1)
Vb = C * I * A * (1ft/12in) * (43,560 ft²/acre) = 2,502ft³ Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
DALE

BONANNI DEVELOPMENT, INC Section IV
2073 Preliminary WQMP Option.docx Page 12
IV.2. SITE DESIGN AND DRAINAGE PLAN
DMA ID
(Options)
Drainage
Area (ft2)
% Imp Design
Storm
Depth (in)
Estimated
Tc (min)
Rainfall
Intensity
(in/hr)
DCV (ft3
) QDesign
(cfs)
BMP Type BMP
Capacity
(cf or cfs)
DMA A 40,511 84 0.95 4.2 0.26 3,002 0.188 INF-7 3,251
DMA A 40,511 84 0.95 4.2 0.26 3,002 0.188 TRT-2 0.198
DMA A 40,511 84 0.95 4.2 0.26 2,502 0.188 BIO-7 0.231
Infiltration BMP (Option 1 with Pre-treatment Device)
If feasible with an infiltration test and applied factor of safety the minimum design infiltration test would need to be 0.3 in/hr. The system will be a pre-treated subsurface chamber system that will retain the DCV and overflow larger storm events into the parkway drain.

Biotreatment BMP (Option 2)
Modular wetland system (MWS) had been proposed with an internal bypass. The system will pump the low flows while the high flows are bypassed and will overflow from the sump pump and into the parkway drain.

Minimize Impervious Area
Infiltration is not be feasible at the site as such, modular wetland system (MWS) had been proposed.

Preserve Existing Drainage Patterns
Existing drainage patterns will be preserved as indicated. The site will drain similarly to existing conditions.

Disconnect Impervious Areas
Buildings will drain into landscaping with yard drains. Impervious surfaces will ultimately drain to the MWS. This is qualitative and will not be used for a volume credit in the HSC.

Landscape Design
Drought tolerant plants have been utilized in the project’s landscape design. The landscape plan has been submitted to the City, under separate review and approval. This is qualitative and will not be used for a volume credit in the HSC.

Drainage Management Areas
The project site drainage will be delineated into one Drainage Management Areas (DMAs).

Right of Way Improvements
There are no public right of way improvements for this project.

Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
DALE

BONANNI DEVELOPMENT, INC Section IV
2073 Preliminary WQMP Option.docx Page 13
IV.3 LID BMP SELECTION AND PROJECT CONFORMANCE ANALYSIS IV.3.1 Hydrologic Source Controls
Name Included?
Localized on-lot infiltration
Impervious area dispersion (e.g. roof top
disconnection)
Street trees (canopy interception)
Residential rain barrels (not actively managed)
Green roofs/Brown roofs
Blue roofs
Impervious area reduction (e.g. permeable
pavers, site design)
Other:

Other:

Buildings will drain into landscaping with yard drains. Impervious surfaces will ultimately drain to the Infiltration system or MWS. This is qualitative and will not be used for a volume credit in the HSC.

Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
DALE

BONANNI DEVELOPMENT, INC Section IV
2073 Preliminary WQMP Option.docx Page 14
IV.3.2 Infiltration BMPs
Name Included?
Bioretention without underdrains
Rain gardens
Porous landscaping
Infiltration planters
Retention swales
Infiltration trenches
Infiltration basins
Drywells
Sub-surface retention system
French drains
Permeable asphalt
Permeable concrete
Permeable concrete pavers
Other:

Other:
(Option 1) See ADS Storm Tech Sizing Sheets Attached in section VIII.

Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
DALE

BONANNI DEVELOPMENT, INC Section IV
2073 Preliminary WQMP Option.docx Page 15
Calculate LID design storm capture volume for Project
Worksheet C: Capture Efficiency Method for Volume‐Based, Constant Drawdown BMPs Step 1: Determine the design capture storm depth used for calculating volume 1 Enter design capture storm depth from Figure III.1, d (inches) d= 0.95 inches 2 Enter calculated drawdown time of the proposed BMP based on equation provided in applicable BMP Fact Sheet, T
(hours)
T= 72 hours
3 Using Figure III.2, determine the "fraction of design capture storm depth" at which the BMP drawdown time (T) line
achieves 80% capture efficiency, X1
X1= 1.2
4 Enter the effect depth of provided HSCs upstream, dHSC (inches) (Worksheet A) dHSC= 0 inches
5 Enter capture efficiency corresponding to dHSC, Y2
(Worksheet A) Y2= 0 %
6 Using Figure III.2, determine the fraction of "design capture storm depth" at which the drawdown time (T) achieves the equivalent of the upstream capture efficiency(Y2), X2
X2= 0
7 Calculate the fraction of design volume that must be
provided by BMP, fraction = X1 - X2
fraction= 1.2
8 Calculate the resultant design capture storm depth (inches), dfraction= fraction × d
dfraction= 1.14 inches
Step 2: Calculate the DCV
1 Enter Project area tributary to BMP (s), A (acres) A= 0.93 acres 2 Enter Project Imperviousness, imp (unitless) imp= 0.84 3 Calculate runoff coefficient, C= (0.75 x imp) + 0.15 C= 0.78 4 Calculate runoff volume, Vdesign= (C x drfraction x A x 43560 x (1/12)) Vdesign= 3,002 cu-ft
Supporting Calculations
Assume minimum 0.30 in/hr. with a factor of safety = 2. An infiltration test will be performed and submitted with final WQMP for approval.

Inf-7 Underground Infiltration Fact Sheet. Computing Device Size based on the BMP type it most strongly resemble which in this case the underground infiltration system with open chambers is similar to Infiltration Basin. Therefore Drawdown time based on 72 hours per OGTD Inf-1 Infiltration Basin Fact Sheet.

Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
DALE

BONANNI DEVELOPMENT, INC Section IV
2073 Preliminary WQMP Option.docx Page 16
Worksheet C: Capture Efficiency Method for Volume‐Based, Constant Drawdown BMPs Two Systems to meet drawdown time (System 1 = 1,590 cf, 1,535 sf); (System 2 = 941 cf, 924 sf), modify footprint to extend gravel footprint (3360 sf Total; additional sf added to footprint = 901 sf and additional volume added (901 sf x 2’x0.4 gravel) = 720 cf.

Total Volume Provided = 3,251 cf
Total Volume = 3,002 cf
Total Area = 3,360 sf
*Kdesign = 0.15 in/hr
Drawdown Time (T=Volume/Area/Kdesign) = [3,002 cf/3,360 sf/(0.15/12)] = 71.5 hrs *Design Infiltration to be confirmed with Final WQMP design.

Graphical Operations
Provide supporting graphical operations. See Example III.6.

Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
DALE

BONANNI DEVELOPMENT, INC Section IV
2073 Preliminary WQMP Option.docx Page 17
Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Rate and Worksheet Factor Category Factor Description
Assigned
Weight (w)
Factor
Value (v)
Product (p)
p = w x v
A
Suitability
Assessment
Soil assessment methods 0.25 1 0.25
Predominant soil texture 0.25 1 0.25
Site soil variability 0.25 1 0.25
Depth to groundwater / impervious
layer

0.25 1 0.25
Suitability Assessment Safety Factor, SA = Sum p 1.00
B Design
Tributary area size 0.25 2 0.50
Level of pretreatment/ expected
sediment loads 0.25
2 0.50
Redundancy 0.25 2 0.50
Compaction during construction 0.25 2 0.50
Design Safety Factor, SB = Sum p 2.00
Combined Safety Factor, STOT= SA x SB

2.00 Measured Infiltration Rate, inch/hr, KM
(corrected for test-specific bias)

0.30 Design Infiltration Rate, in/hr, KDESIGN = KM / STOT

0.15 Supporting Data
Briefly describe infiltration test and provide reference to test forms:

Assume minimum 0.30 in/hr. with a factor of safety = 2. An infiltration test will be performed and submitted with final WQMP for approval.

Drawdown time based on 72 hours per OGTD Inf-1 Infiltration Basin Fact Sheet. Underground infiltration system with open chambers similar to Infiltration Basin.

Footprint to be adjusted based on actual infiltration test to be within 72 hr drawdown time or less.

Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
DALE

BONANNI DEVELOPMENT, INC Section IV
2073 Preliminary WQMP Option.docx Page 18
IV.3.3 Evapotranspiration, Rainwater Harvesting BMPs
Name Included?
All HSCs; See Section IV.3.1
Surface-based infiltration BMPs
Biotreatment BMPs
Above-ground cisterns and basins
Underground detention
Other:

Other:

Not applicable, see worksheet J.

Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
DALE

BONANNI DEVELOPMENT, INC Section IV
2073 Preliminary WQMP Option.docx Page 19
IV.3.4 Biotreatment BMPs
Name Included?
Bioretention with underdrains
Stormwater planter boxes with underdrains
Proprietary vegetated biotreatment systems
(Option 2)
Proprietary vegetated biotreatment systems
The majority of the site will be conveyed into a proposed storm drain system, where the water quality “first flush” treatment for the site will be treated using a bioretention facility. 1 – Determine Design Flow rate. Use Tc = 4.2 min from Hydrology Q = C * i * A
C = (0.75 * Imp %) +0.15 = (0.75 * 0.84) + 0.15 = 0.78
i = 0.26 (From Worksheet D see below)
Q = 0.78 * 0.26 * 0.93
Q = 0.188 cfs
Modular Wetland MWS-L-8-8-V with internal bypass treats 0.231 cfs.

A minimum of 80% TSS removal is required and met with the Bioclean MWS systems.

Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
DALE

BONANNI DEVELOPMENT, INC Section IV
2073 Preliminary WQMP Option.docx Page 20
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
DALE

BONANNI DEVELOPMENT, INC Section IV
2073 Preliminary WQMP Option.docx Page 21
IV.3.5 Hydromodification Control BMPs
BMP Name BMP Description
N/A

IV.3.6 Regional/Sub-Regional LID BMPs
Regional/Sub-Regional LID BMPs
Not applicable.

Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
DALE

BONANNI DEVELOPMENT, INC Section IV
2073 Preliminary WQMP Option.docx Page 22
IV.3.7 Treatment Control BMPs

PRE-TREATMENT
The selected pre-treatment is a stormfilter as manufactured by CONTECH, with filter cartridges media-filled, passive, siphon actuated, radial flow and self-cleaning. 1 – Determine Design Flow rate. From Hydrology Study, Tc = 4.2 min Q = C * i * A
C = (0.75 * Imp %) +0.15 = (0.75 * 0.80) + 0.15 = 0.75
i = 0.26 (From Worksheet D; see section IV.3.4 above)
Q = 0.78 * 0.26 * 0.93
Q = 0.188 cfs
2- Calculate the required cartridges
Using CONTECH Cartridge Height = 18”
Cartridge Flow Rate = 15 gpm = 0.033 cfs
Number of Cartridges Required = 0.188 cfs / 0.033 cfs = 6 cartridges Treatment Control BMPs
BMP Name Treatment Capacity BMP Description G.I.S. Coordinates Pretreatment 0.198 (6 catridges) Contech Stormfilter 33°51'520N 117°59'00"W Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
DALE

BONANNI DEVELOPMENT, INC Section IV
2073 Preliminary WQMP Option.docx Page 23
IV.3.8 Non-structural Source Control BMPs
Non-Structural Source Control BMPs
Identifier Name
Check One
If not applicable, state brief
reason Included Not
Applicable
N1 Education for Property Owners,
Tenants and Occupants

N2 Activity Restrictions
N3 Common Area Landscape
Management
N4 BMP Maintenance
N5 Title 22 CCR Compliance (How
development will comply) No Hazardous Materials
N6 Local Industrial Permit Compliance No Industrial Permit N7 Spill Contingency Plan No Hazardous Materials
N8 Underground Storage Tank
Compliance No Underground Tanks
N9 Hazardous Materials Disclosure
Compliance
No Hazardous Materials
N10 Uniform Fire Code Implementation No Hazardous Materials N11 Common Area Litter Control
N12 Employee Training
N13 Housekeeping of Loading Docks No Loading Docks
N14 Common Area Catch Basin Inspection
N15 Street Sweeping Private Streets and
Parking Lots

N16 Retail Gasoline Outlets No Retail Gasoline Outlets
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
DALE

BONANNI DEVELOPMENT, INC Section IV
2073 Preliminary WQMP Option.docx Page 24
N1 – Education for Property Owners, Tenants and Occupants BONANNI DEVELOPMENT, INC. will provide information contained within this report to educate its employees of general good housekeeping practices that contribute to the protection of storm water quality. See all attachments.

N2 – Activity Restrictions
Activity restrictions can be developed to restrict activities that have the potential to create adverse impacts on water quality. Activities include but are not limited to: the handling and disposal of contaminants, trash management and litter control, irrigation and landscaping practices, vehicle and equipment cleaning, and fertilizer applications.

N3 - Common Area Landscape Management
BONANNI DEVELOPMENT, INC. will be responsible for ongoing landscape maintenance of the Project consistent with the County Management Guidelines for Use of Fertilizers and Pesticides (see Attachment B) and County Ordinance No. 0-97-3987, Water Management and Urban Runoff.

N4 - BMP Maintenance
BONANNI DEVELOPMENT, INC. will be responsible for implementation of each non-structural BMP and scheduled cleaning of all structural BMP facilities. See Table.

N11 - Common Area Litter Control
BONANNI DEVELOPMENT, INC. will implement trash management and litter control procedures aimed at reducing off-site migration of trash and pollution of drainage water. BONANNI DEVELOPMENT, INC. may contract with landscape maintenance firms to provide this service during regularly scheduled maintenance, which should consist of litter patrol and emptying of trash receptacles.

N12 – Employee Training
BONANNI DEVELOPMENT, INC. will train its employees in the methods of storm water protection and public information. This will include the use of the materials contained within this WQMP.

N14 - Common Area Catch Basin Inspection
BONANNI DEVELOPMENT, INC. will be responsible for having the catch basins inspected and cleaned after major rain events and immediately prior to October 1st of each year.

N15 - Private Street Sweeping
BONANNI DEVELOPMENT, INC. will be responsible for having the driveways and parking areas swept immediately prior to October 1st of each year and on a regular basis (monthly at minimum).

Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
DALE

BONANNI DEVELOPMENT, INC Section IV
2073 Preliminary WQMP Option.docx Page 25
IV.3.9 Structural Source Control BMPs
Structural Source Control BMPs
Identifier Name
Check One
If not applicable, state brief
reason Included Not
Applicable
S1 Provide storm drain system stenciling
and signage
S2
Design and construct outdoor material
storage areas to reduce pollution
introduction
No Outdoor Storage
S3
Design and construct trash and waste
storage areas to reduce pollution
introduction
Trash bins for each unit will be
kept in side garage, only brought
out on trash day.

S4
Use efficient irrigation systems &
landscape design, water conservation,
smart controllers, and source control

S5 Protect slopes and channels and
provide energy dissipation No slopes or channels
Incorporate requirements applicable to
individual priority project categories
(from SDRWQCB NPDES Permit)

S6 Dock areas No Dock areas
S7 Maintenance bays No Maintenance bays
S8 Vehicle wash areas No vehicle wash areas
S9 Outdoor processing areas No outdoor processing areas S10 Equipment wash areas No equipment wash areas
S11 Fueling areas No fueling areas
S12 Hillside landscaping No Hillside landscaping
S13 Wash water control for food
preparation areas No food preparation areas
S14 Community car wash racks No community car wash racks Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
DALE

BONANNI DEVELOPMENT, INC Section IV
2073 Preliminary WQMP Option.docx Page 26
S1 - Provide Storm Drain System Stenciling and Signage
Storm drain stencils are highly visible source control messages, typically placed directly adjacent to storm drain inlets. The stencils contain a brief statement that prohibits the dumping of improper materials into the storm drain system. Graphical icons, either illustrating anti-dumping symbols or images of receiving water fauna, are effective supplements to the anti-dumping message. Stencils and signs alert the public to the destination of pollutants discharged into storm water. The following requirements shall be included in the project design and shown on the project plans:

1. Provide stenciling or labeling of all storm drain inlets and catch basins, constructed or modified, within the project area with prohibitive language (such as: “NO DUMPING-DRAINS TO OCEAN”) and /or graphical icons to discourage illegal dumping.

2. Post signs and prohibitive language and/or graphical icons which prohibit illegal dumping at public access points along channels and creeks within the project area.

3. Maintain legibility of stencils and signs.

S4 - Use Efficient Irrigation Systems and Landscape Design The irrigation system will comply with the City and County requirements with respect to water conservation and programmable timers. The landscape areas will comply with the City approved landscape plans and maintenance will comply with the County Management Guidelines on Fertilizers and Pesticides.

Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
DALE

BONANNI DEVELOPMENT, INC Section IV
2073 Preliminary WQMP Option.docx Page 27
IV.4 ALTERNATIVE COMPLIANCE PLAN (IF APPLICABLE)
IV.4.1 Water Quality Credits
Description of Proposed Project
Project Types that Qualify for Water Quality Credits (Select all that apply):

Redevelopment
projects that reduce the
overall impervious
footprint of the project
site.

Brownfield redevelopment, meaning
redevelopment, expansion, or reuse of real
property which may be complicated by the
presence or potential presence of hazardous
substances, pollutants or contaminants, and
which have the potential to contribute to
adverse ground or surface WQ if not
redeveloped.

Higher density development projects which
include two distinct categories (credits can only
be taken for one category): those with more than
seven units per acre of development (lower credit
allowance); vertical density developments, for
example, those with a Floor to Area Ratio (FAR)
of 2 or those having more than 18 units per acre
(greater credit allowance).

Mixed use development, such as a
combination of residential, commercial,
industrial, office, institutional, or other land
uses which incorporate design principles
that can demonstrate environmental benefits
that would not be realized through single
use projects (e.g. reduced vehicle trip traffic
with the potential to reduce sources of water
or air pollution).

Transit-oriented developments, such as a mixed
use residential or commercial area designed to
maximize access to public transportation; similar to
above criterion, but where the development center is
within one half mile of a mass transit center (e.g. bus, rail, light rail or commuter train station). Such
projects would not be able to take credit for both
categories, but may have greater credit assigned
Redevelopment
projects in an established
historic district, historic
preservation area, or
similar significant city
area including core City
Center areas (to be
defined through
mapping).

Developments with
dedication of undeveloped
portions to parks,
preservation areas and
other pervious uses.

Developments
in a city center
area.

Developments
in historic
districts or
historic
preservation
areas.

Live-work developments, a
variety of developments designed
to support residential and
vocational needs together –
similar to criteria to mixed use
development; would not be able
to take credit for both categories.

In-fill projects, the
conversion of empty lots
and other underused
spaces into more
beneficially used spaces,
such as residential or
commercial areas.

Calculation of
Water Quality
Credits
(if applicable)
Not applicable
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
DALE

BONANNI DEVELOPMENT, INC Section V
2073 Preliminary WQMP Option.docx Page 28
Section V Inspection/Maintenance
Responsibility for BMPs
BMP Inspection/Maintenance
BMP
Reponsible
Party(s)
Inspection/
Maintenance
Activities Required
Minimum
Frequency of
Activities
Education for
Property Owners,
Tenants and
Occupants

BONANNI

DEVELOPMENT,
INC.

Provide education information
to new owners, Tenants and
occupants as needed
Continuous
Common Area
Landscape
Management
Construction
Superintendent
during
construction;

BONANNI

DEVELOPMENT,
INC. during postconstruction
Manage landscaping in
accordance with County of
Orange Water Conservation
Ordinance No. 3802 and with
Management Guidelines for
Use of Fertilizers and
Pesticides
Monthly during
regular maintenance
BMP
Maintenance.

BONANNI

DEVELOPMENT,
INC.

BMP table BMP table
Common Area
Litter Control.

Construction
Superintendent
during
construction;

BONANNI

DEVELOPMENT,
INC. during
postconstruction.

Litter Maintenance Continuous
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
DALE

BONANNI DEVELOPMENT, INC Section V
2073 Preliminary WQMP Option.docx Page 29
Employee
Training.

BONANNI

DEVELOPMENT,
INC.

Include the education
materials contained in the
approved Water Quality
Management Plan.

Monthly for
construction
maintenance
personnel and
employees
Catch Basin
Inspection

BONANNI

DEVELOPMENT,
INC.

Inspection
Catch Basins will be
inspected after
major rain events
and immediately
prior to the start of
the rainy season on
October 1st.

Street Sweeping
Private Street and
Parking Lot.

BONANNI

DEVELOPMENT,
INC.

Sweeping
Parking lot will be
swept monthly at a
minimum and
immediately prior to
the start of the rainy
season on October
1st.

Storm Drain
System Stenciling

BONANNI

DEVELOPMENT,
INC.

Repaint as necessary. Annually
Efficient
Irrigation and
Landscape Design

BONANNI

DEVELOPMENT,
INC.

Verify that runoff minimizing
landscape design continues to
function by checking that
water sensors are functioning
properly, that irrigation
heads are adjusted properly
to eliminate overspray to
hardscape areas, and to verify
that irrigation timing and
cycle lengths are adjusted in
accordance with water
demands, given time of year,
weather and day or night
time temperatures. Verify
that plants continue to be
grouped according to similar
water requirements in order
to reduce excess irrigation
runoff.

Once a week, in
conjunction with
maintenance
activities.

Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
DALE

BONANNI DEVELOPMENT, INC Section V
2073 Preliminary WQMP Option.docx Page 30
Sub-surface
Infiltration
System – ADS
Storm Tech
Chamber

BONANNI

DEVELOPMENT,
INC.

Cleaning should be done at
the discretion of individuals
responsible to maintain
proper storage and flow, and
should be scheduled during a
relatively dry season. Refer to
ADS maintenance guidelines
for additional information.

Inspected at a
minimum of one
time a year or after
major rain events.

Contech Storm
Filter
Pretreatment
Device

BONANNI

DEVELOPMENT,
INC.

Inspection and minor
maintenance procedures
include inspection of the vault
itself and removal of
vegetation and trash and
debris. major maintenance
activities include cartridge
replacement and sediment
removal. Refer to Contech
Storm Filter Operation and
Maintenance specifications
for details.

Inspected at least
twice a year and
after major storm
events.

Bioclean Modular
Wetland Device
(Option 2)

BONANNI

DEVELOPMENT,
INC.

Regular inspection and
maintenance are essential to
assure a properly functioning
stormwater system. Annually
remove trash from screening
device. Remove sediment
from separation chamber.

Replace cartridge filter media.

Replace drain own filter
media. Trim vegetation. A
system should initially be
inspected immediately after
completion of the site’s
construction, and prior to
passing responsibility over to
the site’s owner. Refer to
Bioclean Guide for technical
maintenance and operation
details.

Inspected at least
twice a year and
after major storm
events.

Ownership of the project will be held with Bonanni Development, Inc until a Home Owners Association (HOA) is established. Long term maintenance will be the responsibility of the (HOA).

Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
DALE

BONANNI DEVELOPMENT, INC Section VI
2073 Preliminary WQMP Option.docx Page 31
Section VI BMP Exhibit (Site Plan)

VICINITY MAP

NO SCALE
SITE

PRIVATE DRIVE

PEPPERTREE DRIVE (PRIVATE)
LEGEND
Drainage Pattern
Pervious Area (S-4)
Catch Basin Stenciling (S-1)
SCALE: 1"=30' Anaheim, CA

SITE PLAN
VI. - FIGURE 2 Area Contributing to BMP
1442 N. Dale Avenue
P/L
P/L
R/W
P/L

DISCHARGE POINT
DMA AREA IMP. PERV.

AC AC AC
BMP Vreq Vbmp MODEL GPS

CF CF MWS LAT, LONG
Existing SD easement
Adjusted SD easement
Existing 48" SD
Trash Bin Storage Areas
Trash Bin Staging Areas
Typical Trash Condition
(PARKWAY DRAIN)

SURFACE FLOW
1 of 2

OVER FLOW

EXISTING BUILDING
Sub-surface Infiltration Area
OPTION 1
Pre-treament Device
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.

FOR STORMTECH

INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS

VISIT OUR APP
SiteAssist
SC-160LP STORMTECH CHAMBER SPECIFICATIONS

1. CHAMBERS SHALL BE STORMTECH SC-160LP.

2. CHAMBERS SHALL BE ARCH-SHAPED AND SHALL BE MANUFACTURED FROM VIRGIN, IMPACT-MODIFIED POLYPROPYLENE COPOLYMERS.

3. CHAMBERS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM F2418, "STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR POLYPROPYLENE (PP) CORRUGATED WALL STORMWATER COLLECTION CHAMBERS".

4. CHAMBER ROWS SHALL PROVIDE CONTINUOUS, UNOBSTRUCTED INTERNAL SPACE WITH NO INTERNAL SUPPORTS THAT WOULD IMPEDE FLOW OR LIMIT ACCESS FOR INSPECTION.

5. THE STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF THE CHAMBERS, THE STRUCTURAL BACKFILL, AND THE INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS SHALL ENSURE THAT THE LOAD FACTORS SPECIFIED IN THE AASHTO LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS, SECTION 12.12, ARE MET FOR: 1) LONG-DURATION DEAD LOADS AND 2) SHORT-DURATION LIVE LOADS, BASED ON THE AASHTO DESIGN TRUCK WITH CONSIDERATION FOR IMPACT AND MULTIPLE VEHICLE PRESENCES.

6. CHAMBERS SHALL BE DESIGNED, TESTED AND ALLOWABLE LOAD CONFIGURATIONS DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM F2787, "STANDARD PRACTICE FOR STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF THERMOPLASTIC CORRUGATED WALL STORMWATER COLLECTION CHAMBERS".

LOAD CONFIGURATIONS SHALL INCLUDE: 1) INSTANTANEOUS (<1 MIN) AASHTO DESIGN TRUCK LIVE LOAD ON MINIMUM COVER 2) MAXIMUM PERMANENT (75-YR) COVER LOAD AND 3) ALLOWABLE COVER WITH PARKED (1-WEEK) AASHTO DESIGN TRUCK.

7. REQUIREMENTS FOR HANDLING AND INSTALLATION:
· TO MAINTAIN THE WIDTH OF CHAMBERS DURING SHIPPING AND HANDLING, CHAMBERS SHALL HAVE INTEGRAL, INTERLOCKING STACKING LUGS.
· TO ENSURE A SECURE JOINT DURING INSTALLATION AND BACKFILL, THE HEIGHT OF THE CHAMBER JOINT SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 1.5”.
· TO ENSURE THE INTEGRITY OF THE ARCH SHAPE DURING INSTALLATION, a) THE ARCH STIFFNESS CONSTANT AS DEFINED IN SECTION 6.2.8 OF ASTM F2418 SHALL BE GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 400 LBS/IN/IN. AND b) TO RESIST CHAMBER DEFORMATION DURING INSTALLATION AT ELEVATED TEMPERATURES (ABOVE 73° F / 23° C), CHAMBERS SHALL BE PRODUCED FROM REFLECTIVE GOLD OR YELLOW COLORS.

8. ONLY CHAMBERS THAT ARE APPROVED BY THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER WILL BE ALLOWED. UPON REQUEST BY THE SITE DESIGN

ENGINEER OR OWNER, THE CHAMBER MANUFACTURER SHALL SUBMIT A STRUCTURAL EVALUATION FOR APPROVAL BEFORE DELIVERING CHAMBERS TO THE PROJECT SITE AS FOLLOWS:
· THE STRUCTURAL EVALUATION SHALL BE SEALED BY A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER. · THE STRUCTURAL EVALUATION SHALL DEMONSTRATE THAT THE SAFETY FACTORS ARE GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 1.95 FOR DEAD LOAD AND 1.75 FOR LIVE LOAD, THE MINIMUM REQUIRED BY ASTM F2787 AND BY SECTIONS 3 AND 12.12 OF THE AASHTO LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS FOR THERMOPLASTIC PIPE. · THE TEST DERIVED CREEP MODULUS AS SPECIFIED IN ASTM F2418 SHALL BE USED FOR PERMANENT DEAD LOAD DESIGN EXCEPT THAT IT SHALL BE THE 75-YEAR MODULUS USED FOR DESIGN.

9. CHAMBERS AND END CAPS SHALL BE PRODUCED AT AN ISO 9001 CERTIFIED MANUFACTURING FACILITY.

IMPORTANT - NOTES FOR THE BIDDING AND INSTALLATION OF THE SC-160LP SYSTEM

1. STORMTECH SC-160LP CHAMBERS SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED UNTIL THE MANUFACTURER'S REPRESENTATIVE HAS COMPLETED A PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING WITH THE INSTALLERS.

2. STORMTECH SC-160LP CHAMBERS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE "STORMTECH SC-160LP CONSTRUCTION GUIDE".

3. FOUNDATION STONE AND EMBEDMENT STONE SURROUNDING CHAMBERS MUST BE A CLEAN, CRUSHED, ANGULAR STONE; AASHTO M43 #3,357, 4, 467, 5, 56, OR 57.

4. THE FOUNDATION STONE SHALL BE LEVELED AND COMPACTED PRIOR TO PLACING CHAMBERS.

5. THE DEPTH OF FOUNDATION STONE SHALL BE DETERMINED BASED ON THE SUBGRADE BEARING CAPACITY PROVIDED BY THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER.

6. THE CONTRACTOR MUST REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES CONCERNING CHAMBER FOUNDATION DESIGN AND SUBGRADE BEARING CAPACITIES TO THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER.

7. JOINTS BETWEEN CHAMBERS SHALL BE PROPERLY SEATED PRIOR TO PLACING STONE.

8. CHAMBERS SHALL BE INSTALLED "TOE TO TOE". NO ADDITIONAL SPACING BETWEEN ROWS IS REQUIRED.

9. STORMTECH RECOMMENDS 3 BACKFILL METHODS:
· STONESHOOTER LOCATED OFF THE CHAMBER BED.
· BACKFILL AS ROWS ARE BUILT USING AN EXCAVATOR ON THE FOUNDATION STONE OR SUBGRADE. · BACKFILL FROM OUTSIDE THE EXCAVATION USING A LONG BOOM HOE OR EXCAVATOR.

10. ADS RECOMMENDS THE USE OF "FLEXSTORM CATCH IT" INSERTS DURING CONSTRUCTION FOR ALL INLETS TO PROTECT THE SUBSURFACE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FROM CONSTRUCTION SITE RUNOFF.

NOTES FOR CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT

1. THE USE OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT OVER SC-160LP CHAMBERS IS LIMITED:
· NO EQUIPMENT IS ALLOWED ON BARE CHAMBERS.
· NO RUBBER TIRED LOADERS, DUMP TRUCKS, OR EXCAVATORS ARE ALLOWED UNTIL PROPER FILL DEPTHS ARE REACHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE "STORMTECH SC-160LP CONSTRUCTION GUIDE".
· WEIGHT LIMITS FOR CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT CAN BE FOUND IN THE "STORMTECH SC-106LP CONSTRUCTION GUIDE".

2. FULL 36" (900 mm) OF STABILIZED COVER MATERIALS OVER THE CHAMBERS IS REQUIRED FOR DUMP TRUCK TRAVEL OR DUMPING.

PROJECT INFORMATION

ADS SALES REP
PROJECT NO.

ENGINEERED PRODUCT

MANAGER
DALE

ANAHEIM, CA
StormTech
888-892-2694 | WWW.STORMTECH.COM
®
Chamber System
4640 TRUEMAN BLVD
HILLIARD, OH 43026
1-800-733-7473
DATE: DRAWN: MPPROJECT #: CHECKED: N/A
THIS DRAWING HAS BEEN PREPARED BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED TO ADS UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER OR OTHER PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE. THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER SHALL REVIEW THIS DRAWING PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. IT IS THE ULTIMATE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER TO ENSURE THAT THE PRODUCT(S) DEPICTED AND ALL ASSOCIATED DETAILS MEET ALL APPLICABLE LAWS, REGULATIONS, AND PROJECT REQUIREMENTS.

DATE DRW CHK DESCRIPTION
DALE

ANAHEIM, CA
SHEET
2 5 OF
NOTES
• MANIFOLD SIZE TO BE DETERMINED BY SITE DESIGN ENGINEER. SEE TECH NOTE #6.32 FOR MANIFOLD SIZING GUIDANCE. • DUE TO THE ADAPTATION OF THIS CHAMBER SYSTEM TO SPECIFIC SITE AND DESIGN CONSTRAINTS, IT MAY BE NECESSARY TO CUT AND COUPLE ADDITIONAL PIPE TO STANDARD MANIFOLD COMPONENTS IN THE FIELD.
• THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER MUST REVIEW ELEVATIONS AND IF NECESSARY ADJUST GRADING TO ENSURE THE CHAMBER COVER REQUIREMENTS ARE MET. • THIS CHAMBER SYSTEM WAS DESIGNED WITHOUT SITE-SPECIFIC INFORMATION ON SOIL CONDITIONS OR BEARING CAPACITY. THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR

DETERMINING
THE SUITABILITY OF THE SOIL AND PROVIDING THE BEARING CAPACITY OF THE INSITU SOILS. THE BASE STONE DEPTH MAY BE INCREASED OR DECREASED ONCE THIS INFORMATION IS PROVIDED.
• NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION: THIS LAYOUT IS FOR DIMENSIONAL PURPOSES ONLY TO PROVE CONCEPT & THE REQUIRED STORAGE VOLUME CAN BE ACHIEVED ON SITE.

CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS
MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE GRADE (TOP OF PAVEMENT/UNPAVED): 11.50 MINIMUM ALLOWABLE GRADE (UNPAVED WITH TRAFFIC): 3.17
MINIMUM ALLOWABLE GRADE (UNPAVED NO TRAFFIC): 2.67
MINIMUM ALLOWABLE GRADE (TOP OF RIGID CONCRETE PAVEMENT): 2.67 MINIMUM ALLOWABLE GRADE (BASE OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT): 2.67 TOP OF STONE: 2.00
TOP OF SC-160LP CHAMBER: 1.50
8" ISOLATOR ROW PLUS INVERT: 0.58
8" x 8" BOTTOM MANIFOLD INVERT: 0.56
BOTTOM OF SC-160LP CHAMBER: 0.50
BOTTOM OF STONE: 0.00

PROPOSED LAYOUT
88 STORMTECH SC-160LP CHAMBERS
44 STORMTECH SC-160LP END CAPS
6 STONE ABOVE (in)
6 STONE BELOW (in)
40 STONE VOID
1590

INSTALLED SYSTEM VOLUME (CF)
(PERIMETER STONE INCLUDED)
(COVER STONE INCLUDED)
(BASE STONE INCLUDED)
1535 SYSTEM AREA (SF)
164.6 SYSTEM PERIMETER (ft)
*INVERT ABOVE BASE OF CHAMBER
DESCRIPTION INVERT* MAX FLOW ITEM ON

LAYOUT PART TYPE
MANIFOLD A 8" x 8" BOTTOM MANIFOLD, MOLDED FITTINGS 0.66" B (DESIGN BY ENGINEER / PROVIDED BY OTHERS) 2.2 CFS IN CONCRETE STRUCTURE W/WEIR

ISOLATOR ROW PLUS
(SEE DETAIL)
PLACE MINIMUM 12.50' OF ADSPLUS125 WOVEN GEOTEXTILE OVER BEDDING

STONE AND UNDERNEATH CHAMBER FEET FOR SCOUR PROTECTION AT ALL

CHAMBER INLET ROWS

BED LIMITS
20' 10' 0

34.48'

47.83'

28.93'

45.83'
A
B
StormTech
888-892-2694 | WWW.STORMTECH.COM
®
Chamber System

MATERIAL LOCATION DESCRIPTION AASHTO MATERIAL

CLASSIFICATIONS COMPACTION / DENSITY REQUIREMENT
D
FINAL FILL: FILL MATERIAL FOR LAYER 'D' STARTS FROM THE TOP OF THE 'C'

LAYER TO THE BOTTOM OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT OR UNPAVED FINISHED GRADE ABOVE. NOTE THAT PAVEMENT SUBBASE MAY BE PART OF THE 'D' LAYER
ANY SOIL/ROCK MATERIALS, NATIVE SOILS, OR PER ENGINEER'S PLANS.

CHECK PLANS FOR PAVEMENT SUBGRADE REQUIREMENTS. N/A
PREPARE PER SITE DESIGN ENGINEER'S PLANS. PAVED

INSTALLATIONS MAY HAVE STRINGENT MATERIAL AND
PREPARATION REQUIREMENTS.

C
INITIAL FILL: FILL MATERIAL FOR LAYER 'C' STARTS FROM THE TOP OF THE EMBEDMENT STONE ('B' LAYER) TO 14" (355 mm) ABOVE THE TOP OF THE CHAMBER. NOTE THAT PAVEMENT SUBBASE MAY BE A PART OF THE 'C' LAYER.

GRANULAR WELL-GRADED SOIL/AGGREGATE MIXTURES, <35% FINES OR PROCESSED AGGREGATE.

MOST PAVEMENT SUBBASE MATERIALS CAN BE USED IN LIEU OF THIS LAYER.

AASHTO M145¹
A-1, A-2-4, A-3
OR
AASHTO M43¹
3, 357, 4, 467, 5, 56, 57, 6, 67, 68, 7, 78, 8, 89, 9, 10 BEGIN COMPACTIONS AFTER 12" (300 mm) OF MATERIAL OVER
THE CHAMBERS IS REACHED. COMPACT ADDITIONAL LAYERS IN
6" (150 mm) MAX LIFTS TO A MIN. 95% PROCTOR DENSITY FOR WELL GRADED MATERIAL AND 95% RELATIVE DENSITY FOR
PROCESSED AGGREGATE MATERIALS. ROLLER GROSS
VEHICLE WEIGHT NOT TO EXCEED 12,000 lbs (53 kN). DYNAMIC FORCE NOT TO EXCEED 20,000 lbs (89 kN).

B
EMBEDMENT STONE: FILL SURROUNDING THE CHAMBERS FROM THE FOUNDATION STONE ('A' LAYER) TO THE 'C' LAYER ABOVE. CLEAN, CRUSHED, ANGULAR STONE AASHTO M43¹ 3, 357, 4, 467, 5, 56, 57 NO COMPACTION REQUIRED.

A
FOUNDATION STONE: FILL BELOW CHAMBERS FROM THE SUBGRADE UP TO THE FOOT (BOTTOM) OF THE CHAMBER. CLEAN, CRUSHED, ANGULAR STONE AASHTO M43¹ 3, 357, 4, 467, 5, 56, 57 PLATE COMPACT OR ROLL TO ACHIEVE A FLAT SURFACE. 2,3
PLEASE NOTE:

1. THE LISTED AASHTO DESIGNATIONS ARE FOR GRADATIONS ONLY. THE STONE MUST ALSO BE CLEAN, CRUSHED, ANGULAR. FOR EXAMPLE, A SPECIFICATION FOR #4 STONE WOULD STATE: "CLEAN, CRUSHED, ANGULAR NO. 4 (AASHTO M43) STONE".

2. STORMTECH COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS ARE MET FOR 'A' LOCATION MATERIALS WHEN PLACED AND COMPACTED IN 6" (150 mm) (MAX) LIFTS USING TWO FULL COVERAGES WITH A VIBRATORY COMPACTOR.

3. WHERE INFILTRATION SURFACES MAY BE COMPROMISED BY COMPACTION, FOR STANDARD DESIGN LOAD CONDITIONS, A FLAT SURFACE MAY BE ACHIEVED BY RAKING OR DRAGGING WITHOUT COMPACTION EQUIPMENT. FOR SPECIAL LOAD DESIGNS, CONTACT STORMTECH FOR COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS.

4. ONCE LAYER 'C' IS PLACED, ANY SOIL/MATERIAL CAN BE PLACED IN LAYER 'D' UP TO THE FINISHED GRADE. MOST PAVEMENT SUBBASE SOILS CAN BE USED TO REPLACE THE MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS OF LAYER 'C' OR 'D' AT THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER'S DISCRETION.

ACCEPTABLE FILL MATERIALS: STORMTECH SC-160LP CHAMBER SYSTEMS NOTES:

1. CHAMBERS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM F2418, "STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR POLYPROPYLENE (PP) CORRUGATED WALL STORMWATER COLLECTION CHAMBERS".

2. CHAMBERS SHALL BE DESIGNED, TESTED AND ALLOWABLE LOAD CONFIGURATIONS DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM F2787, "STANDARD PRACTICE FOR STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF THERMOPLASTIC CORRUGATED WALL STORMWATER COLLECTION CHAMBERS". LOAD CONFIGURATIONS SHALL INCLUDE: 1) INSTANTANEOUS (<1 MIN) AASHTO DESIGN TRUCK LIVE LOAD ON MINIMUM COVER 2) MAXIMUM PERMANENT (75-YR) COVER LOAD AND 3) ALLOWABLE COVER WITH PARKED (1-WEEK) AASHTO DESIGN TRUCK.

3. THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ASSESSING THE BEARING RESISTANCE (ALLOWABLE BEARING CAPACITY) OF THE SUBGRADE SOILS AND THE DEPTH OF FOUNDATION STONE WITH CONSIDERATION FOR THE RANGE OF EXPECTED SOIL MOISTURE CONDITIONS.

4. PERIMETER STONE MUST BE EXTENDED HORIZONTALLY TO THE EXCAVATION WALL FOR BOTH VERTICAL AND SLOPED EXCAVATION WALLS.

5. REQUIREMENTS FOR HANDLING AND INSTALLATION:
· TO MAINTAIN THE WIDTH OF CHAMBERS DURING SHIPPING AND HANDLING, CHAMBERS SHALL HAVE INTEGRAL, INTERLOCKING STACKING LUGS · TO ENSURE A SECURE JOINT DURING INSTALLATION AND BACKFILL, THE HEIGHT OF THE CHAMBER JOINT SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 1.5” · TO ENSURE THE INTEGRITY OF THE ARCH SHAPE DURING INSTALLATION, a) THE ARCH STIFFNESS CONSTANT AS DEFINED IN SECTION 6.2.8 OF ASTM F2418 SHALL BE GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 400 LBS/IN/IN. AND b) TO RESIST CHAMBER DEFORMATION DURING INSTALLATION AT ELEVATED TEMPERATURES (ABOVE 73° F / 23° C), CHAMBERS SHALL BE PRODUCED FROM REFLECTIVE GOLD OR YELLOW COLORS.

D
C
B
A
*TO BOTTOM OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT. FOR UNPAVED

INSTALLATIONS WHERE RUTTING FROM VEHICLES MAY
OCCUR, INCREASE COVER TO 20" (510 mm).
6" N12
8" N12
StormTech SC-160
6" N12
8" N12
StormTech SC-160
6" N12
8" N12
StormTech SC-160
6" N12
8" N12
StormTech SC-160
6" N1
8" N12
StormTech SC-160

PAVEMENT LAYER (DESIGNED

BY SITE DESIGN ENGINEER)

SUBGRADE SOILS
(SEE NOTE 3)

PERIMETER STONE
(SEE NOTE 4)

EXCAVATION WALL
(CAN BE SLOPED OR VERTICAL)
SC-160LP

END CAP NO SPACING REQUIRED

BETWEEN CHAMBERS
12"
(300 mm)
14"
(350 mm)
MIN*
10'
(3.0 m)
MAX
6" (150 mm) MIN
12" (300 mm) MIN 25"
(635 mm)
12" (300 mm)
TYP

DEPTH OF BASE STONE TO BE DETERMINED
BY SITE DESIGN ENGINEER 6" (150 mm) MIN
ADS GEOSYNTHETICS 601T NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE ALL

AROUND CLEAN, CRUSHED, ANGULAR STONE IN A & B LAYERS
4640 TRUEMAN BLVD
HILLIARD, OH 43026
1-800-733-7473
DATE: DRAWN: MPPROJECT #: CHECKED: N/A
THIS DRAWING HAS BEEN PREPARED BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED TO ADS UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER OR OTHER PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE. THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER SHALL REVIEW THIS DRAWING PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. IT IS THE ULTIMATE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER TO ENSURE THAT THE PRODUCT(S) DEPICTED AND ALL ASSOCIATED DETAILS MEET ALL APPLICABLE LAWS, REGULATIONS, AND PROJECT REQUIREMENTS.

DATE DRW CHK DESCRIPTION
DALE

ANAHEIM, CA
SHEET
3 5 OF
StormTech
888-892-2694 | WWW.STORMTECH.COM
®
Chamber System

INSPECTION & MAINTENANCE
STEP 1) INSPECT ISOLATOR ROW PLUS FOR SEDIMENT
A. INSPECTION PORTS (IF PRESENT)
A.1. REMOVE/OPEN LID ON NYLOPLAST INLINE DRAIN
A.2. REMOVE AND CLEAN FLEXSTORM FILTER IF INSTALLED
A.3. USING A FLASHLIGHT AND STADIA ROD, MEASURE DEPTH OF SEDIMENT AND RECORD ON MAINTENANCE LOG A.4. LOWER A CAMERA INTO ISOLATOR ROW PLUS FOR VISUAL INSPECTION OF SEDIMENT LEVELS (OPTIONAL) A.5. IF SEDIMENT IS AT, OR ABOVE, 3" (80 mm) PROCEED TO STEP 2. IF NOT, PROCEED TO STEP 3.

B. ALL ISOLATOR PLUS ROWS
B.1. REMOVE COVER FROM STRUCTURE AT UPSTREAM END OF ISOLATOR ROW PLUS B.2. USING A FLASHLIGHT, INSPECT DOWN THE ISOLATOR ROW PLUS THROUGH OUTLET PIPE i) MIRRORS ON POLES OR CAMERAS MAY BE USED TO AVOID A CONFINED SPACE ENTRY ii) FOLLOW OSHA REGULATIONS FOR CONFINED SPACE ENTRY IF ENTERING MANHOLE B.3. IF SEDIMENT IS AT, OR ABOVE, 3" (80 mm) PROCEED TO STEP 2. IF NOT, PROCEED TO STEP 3.

STEP 2) CLEAN OUT ISOLATOR ROW PLUS USING THE JETVAC PROCESS A. A FIXED CULVERT CLEANING NOZZLE WITH REAR FACING SPREAD OF 45" (1.1 m) OR MORE IS PREFERRED B. APPLY MULTIPLE PASSES OF JETVAC UNTIL BACKFLUSH WATER IS CLEAN C. VACUUM STRUCTURE SUMP AS REQUIRED
STEP 3) REPLACE ALL COVERS, GRATES, FILTERS, AND LIDS; RECORD OBSERVATIONS AND ACTIONS.

STEP 4) INSPECT AND CLEAN BASINS AND MANHOLES UPSTREAM OF THE STORMTECH SYSTEM.

NOTES

1. INSPECT EVERY 6 MONTHS DURING THE FIRST YEAR OF OPERATION. ADJUST THE INSPECTION INTERVAL BASED ON PREVIOUS OBSERVATIONS OF SEDIMENT ACCUMULATION AND HIGH WATER ELEVATIONS.

2. CONDUCT JETTING AND VACTORING ANNUALLY OR WHEN INSPECTION SHOWS THAT MAINTENANCE IS NECESSARY.

SC-160LP ISOLATOR ROW PLUS DETAIL
NTS

CATCH BASIN
OR

MANHOLE
STORMTECH HIGHLY RECOMMENDS SC-160LP CHAMBER

FLEXSTORM INSERTS IN ANY UPSTREAM

STRUCTURES WITH OPEN GRATES
8" (200 mm) HDPE ACCESS PIPE REQUIRED USE 8" OPEN END CAP PART #: SC160IEPP08
SC-160LP END CAP

OPTIONAL INSPECTION PORT
ONE LAYER OF ADSPLUS125 WOVEN GEOTEXTILE BETWEEN

FOUNDATION STONE AND CHAMBERS
4' (1.2 m) MIN WIDE CONTINUOUS FABRIC WITHOUT SEAMS

SUMP DEPTH TBD BY

SITE DESIGN ENGINEER
(24" [600 mm] MIN RECOMMENDED)
4640 TRUEMAN BLVD
HILLIARD, OH 43026
1-800-733-7473
DATE: DRAWN: MPPROJECT #: CHECKED: N/A
THIS DRAWING HAS BEEN PREPARED BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED TO ADS UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER OR OTHER PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE. THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER SHALL REVIEW THIS DRAWING PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. IT IS THE ULTIMATE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER TO ENSURE THAT THE PRODUCT(S) DEPICTED AND ALL ASSOCIATED DETAILS MEET ALL APPLICABLE LAWS, REGULATIONS, AND PROJECT REQUIREMENTS.

DATE DRW CHK DESCRIPTION
DALE

ANAHEIM, CA
SHEET
4 5 OF
StormTech
888-892-2694 | WWW.STORMTECH.COM
®
Chamber System
PART # STUB A
SC160EPP
6" (150 mm) 0.66" (16 mm)
8" (200 mm) 0.80" (20 mm)
SC160EPP08 8" (200 mm) 0.96" (24 mm)

ALL STUBS ARE PLACED AT BOTTOM OF END CAP SUCH THAT THE OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF THE STUB IS FLUSH WITH THE BOTTOM OF THE END CAP. FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONTACT STORMTECH AT 1-888-892-2694.

NOTE: ALL DIMENSIONS ARE NOMINAL

NOMINAL CHAMBER SPECIFICATIONS
SIZE (W X H X INSTALLED LENGTH) 25.0" X 12.0" X 85.4" (635 mm X 305 mm X 2169 mm) CHAMBER STORAGE 6.85 CUBIC FEET (0.19 m³)
MINIMUM INSTALLED STORAGE* 16.0 CUBIC FEET (0.45 m³)
WEIGHT 24.0 lbs. (10.9 kg)
*ASSUMES 6" (152 mm) ABOVE, 6" (152 mm) BELOW, AND STONE BETWEEN CHAMBERS WITH 40% STONE POROSITY.

BUILD ROW IN THIS DIRECTION

START END
SC-160LP TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION
NTS
StormTech SC-160
6" N12
8" N12
StormTech SC-160

OVERLAP NEXT CHAMBER HERE (OVER SMALL CORRUGATION)

25.0"
(635 mm)

12.0"
(305 mm)

90.7" (2304 mm) ACTUAL LENGTH

85.4" (2169 mm) INSTALLED LENGTH

4.4"
(112 mm)
A

11.7"
(297 mm)

18.6"
(472 mm)
4640 TRUEMAN BLVD
HILLIARD, OH 43026
1-800-733-7473
DATE: DRAWN: MPPROJECT #: CHECKED: N/A
THIS DRAWING HAS BEEN PREPARED BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED TO ADS UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER OR OTHER PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE. THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER SHALL REVIEW THIS DRAWING PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. IT IS THE ULTIMATE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER TO ENSURE THAT THE PRODUCT(S) DEPICTED AND ALL ASSOCIATED DETAILS MEET ALL APPLICABLE LAWS, REGULATIONS, AND PROJECT REQUIREMENTS.

DATE DRW CHK DESCRIPTION
DALE

ANAHEIM, CA
SHEET
5 5 OF
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.