1. Agreement — Anaheim City Council, May 16, 2023

1 A G R E E M E N T

THIS AGREEMENT, dated for purposes of identification only this day of

, 2023, is made and entered into by and between the

CITY OF ANAHEIM, a municipal corporation,
hereinafter referred to as "ANAHEIM,"

A
N
D

POPULOUS, INC., a Missouri corporation,
hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT."

ANAHEIM and CONSULTANT are sometimes individually referred to herein as "Party" and collectively as "Parties."

W I T N E S S E T H:

WHEREAS, ANAHEIM desires to obtain the services of CONSULTANT to provide a review and assessment of the current and future capital needs of Angel Stadium of Anaheim and to obtain a capital repair, replacement and improvement program (the "Project"); and

WHEREAS, CONSULTANT possesses the skill, experience, ability, background, certification and knowledge to provide the services for the Project as described in this Agreement; and

WHEREAS, ANAHEIM issued a Request for Proposals and received a proposal from CONSULTANT, has reviewed the previous experience and evaluated the expertise of CONSULTANT, and desires to retain CONSULTANT to render professional services under the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL

PROMISES, COVENANTS AND CONDITIONS HEREIN CONTAINED, THE PARTIES HERETO AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
2 1. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY CONSULTANT

In compliance with all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall provide to ANAHEIM all labor, materials, tools, equipment, services, and incidental and customary work necessary to fully and adequately supply the professional consulting services necessary for the Project, including but not limited to completion of a comprehensive property condition assessment. The assessment shall consist of direct observation, review and interpretation of documents, interviews with personnel, input from management and ownership, and evaluation of the actual condition of the major physical elements, systems and operations. The assessment shall be conducted in such a way and at such times as to avoid disrupting the on-going operations of Angel Stadium of Anaheim. The purpose of t he Property Condition Assessment is to establish a baseline on facility’s current condition focusing on infrastructure elements. The condition of the infrastructure will provide 1) an owner with a reasonable set of expectations regarding current condition, future repairs and replacement, and 2) provide cost estimates for future renovations. CONSULTANT shall also provide recommendations. prioritizing recommendations based on immediate need, opportunity and understanding of “Best Practices” in facility operations, and review specific sections of the Lease Agreement which detail the maintenance responsibilities of the Tenant, including but not limited to excerpts from Section 10 and Section 22 of the May 15, 1996 Lease Agreement between the City of Anaheim and Angles Baseball, LP, and provide an analysis of how these provisions relate to the current condition of Angel Stadium of Anaheim In addition to the above described services, CONSULTANT shall also provide the services as more particularly described in the Request for Proposals dated February 15, 2023 (all together hereinafter referred to as “Services”), attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated hereby by reference and CONSULTANT’s Proposal dated March 20, 2023, attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and incorporated herein by this reference ("Scope of Services").

In the event of conflicting provisions, the provisions shall govern in the following order: (1) this Agreement; (2) the Request for Proposals; and (3) the Proposal . ANAHEIM may elect to delete certain tasks from the Scope of Services in its sole discretion.

2. TERM

The term of this Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date of this Agreement as set forth in Section 38 herein, and shall terminate upon the completion of the Services described herein, unless terminated earlier as set forth in Section 25 herein ("Term").

3. TIME OF PERFORMANCE

3.1 Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement and the Services shall be performed as expeditiously as is consistent with professional skill and care and the orderly progress of the Project . The failure by CONSULTANT to perform the Services in a diligent and timely manner may result in termination of this Agreement by ANAHEIM.

3.2 The time period(s) specified for performance of the Services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be extended because of any delays due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of CONSULTANT, including, but not restricted to, acts of God or of t he public enemy, unusually severe weather, fires, earthquakes, floods, pestilence, and other natural catastrophes, epidemics, pandemics, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes, freight embargoes, wars, litigation, civil disturbance or disobedience, sabotage, 3 restraint by court order or public authority and action or non -action by or inability to obtain the necessary authorization or approvals from any governmental agency or authority, and/or acts of any governmental agency, including ANAHEIM, which b y the exercise of due diligence such Party could not reasonably have been expected to avoid and which by exercise of due diligence has been unable to overcome, if CONSULTANT shall within ten (10) days of the commencement of such delay notify the Project Administrator in writing of the causes of the delay. The Project Administrator shall ascertain the facts and the extent of delay, and may extend the time for performing the Services for the period of the enforced delay if, in the reasonable judgment of the Project Administrator, such delay is justified. The Project Administrator's determination shall be final and conclusive upon the Parties to this Agreement. In the event of delay, however caused, CONSULTANT's sole remedy shall be an extension of this Agree ment pursuant to this Section and CONSULTANT shall not be entitled to recover damages against ANAHEIM.

4. COMPENSATION

4.1 CONSULTANT shall be paid for the Services based on the amounts set forth in the Fee Proposal Form set forth in the Proposal attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by reference (“Proposal”).

4.2 It is understood by and agreed between the Parties to this Agreement that full and complete payment for all Services provided in accordance with this Agreement, including, but not limited to, all reimbursable expenses and subcontractor fees, if any, shall not exceed Three Hundred Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars and No/100 Cents ($325,000.00) (“Contract Amount”).

4.3. Subject to the limitations set forth in this Section, the City Attorney is authorized to approve additional expenditures not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the Contract Amount for Extra Services not included in the Scope of Services ("Extra Services"); provided, the City Attorney determines, in his sole discretion, that (a) the E xtra Services are necessary for the successful completion of the Services; (b) the proposed Extra Services are of a like nature that were not foreseen by ANAHEIM at the time of the award of the Agreement; (c) budget appropriations are available; and (d) in the professional opinion of the City Attorney, it is in the City's best interest to do so.

.01 In no event shall CONSULTANT render Extra Services beyond the scope of this Agreement without the written authorization of the City Attorney.

.02 All Extra Services approved in writing by the City Attorney shall be billed at either the rates set forth in the Proposal or at a fixed price, at ANAHEIM’s sole discretion.

If billed at a fixed price, CONSULTANT shall provide ANAHEIM with a general description of the Extra Services to be performed with a proposed price. The Extra Services will be incorporated into the Services and the Agreement upon the execution of an Extra Services letter by both Parties which contains (a) the agreed price for the Extra Services; and a description of the Extra Services.

CONSULTANT shall commence performance of the Extra Services either upon the execution of the Extra Services letter by the Parties or such other time expressly indicated therein.

.03 Except for the authority granted the City Attorney in this Section, no additional Services or Extra Services beyond the scope of this Agreement shall be rendered by CONSULTANT unless such Extra Services is first approved by written amendment to this Agreement.

4 4.4 CONSULTANT shall submit monthly invoices to ANAHEIM describing the work performed the preceding month. CONSULTANT’s bills shall include the name of the person who performed the work, a brief description of the Services performed and/or the specific task in the Scope of Services to which it relates, the date the Services were performed, the number of hours spent on all work billed on an hourly basis, and a description of any reimbursable expenditures. ANAHEIM shall pay CONSULTANT no later than thirty (30) days after receipt of the monthly invoice by ANAHEIM staff, unless ANAHEIM staff has a good faith dispute with such invoice, in which case it shall notify CONSULTANT of such dispute promptly and provide CONSULTANT an opportunity to cure such dispute

4.5 All Parties recognize that the continuation of this Agreement after the close of any fiscal year of ANAHEIM, which fiscal year ends on June 30 of each year, shall be subject to budget approval providing for or covering such contract items as an expenditure in said budget.

ANAHEIM does not represent that said budget item will be actually adopted, said determination being the determination of the City Council at the time of the adoption of the budget herein. No penalty shall accrue to ANAHEIM in the event this provision shall be exercised. Should termination be accomplished in accordance with this Section, a settlement shall be negotiated by the Parties based on items delivered, services provided, monies paid and monies due.

5. PROJECT MANAGER

5.1 CONSULTANT shall designate a Project Manager, who s hall coordinate the Services. This Project Manager shall be available to ANAHEIM at all reasonable times during the Term of this Agreement. CONSULTANT has designated Eric Randolph to be its Project Manager. It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the foregoing Project Manager is a substantial inducement for ANAHEIM to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the foregoing Project Manager shall be responsible during the Term of this Agreement for directing all activities of CONSULTANT and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the provision of Services hereunder. The foregoing Project Manager may not be changed by CONSULTANT and no other personnel may be assigned to supervise the Services to be provided hereunder without the express written consent of ANAHEIM.

5.2 Any personnel or subconsultant, if any, who fail or refuse to perform the Services in a manner acceptable to ANAHEIM, or who are determined by ANAHEIM, in its sole reasonable discretion, to be unco operative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Project, or a threat to the safety of persons or property, shall be promptly removed from the Project by CONSULTANT at the request of ANAHEIM. CONSULTANT will continuously furnish the necessary personnel to complete the Services on a timely basis as contemplated by this Agreement.

6. ADMINISTRATION

This Agreement will be administered by the City’s Attorney Office. The employees of the City Attorney’s Office shall be authorized to take the following actions pursuant to this Agreement:

(i) The City Attorney or designee is authorized to take any and all actions on behalf of ANAHEIM as set forth herein, including review and approval of all Services performed by CONSULTANT under this Agreement and to terminate services in accordance with Section 25 of this Agreement.

5 7. STANDARD OF CARE

7.1 CONSULTANT shall perform all Services under this Agreement in a skillful and competent manner, consistent with the standards generally recognized as being employed by professionals in the same discipline in the State of California. CONSULTANT represents and maintains that it is skilled in the professional calling necessary to perform the Services. CONSULTANT acknowledges that all employees and subconsultants, if any, shall have sufficient skill and experience to perform the Services assigned to them.

7.2 CONSULTANT represents and warrants to ANAHEIM that it has, shall obtain, and shall keep in full force in effect during the term hereof, at its sole cost and expense, all licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance and approvals of whatsoever nature that is legally required of CONSULTANT to practice its profession. CONSULTANT shall maintain a City of Anaheim business license during the term of this Agreement.

8. FAMILIARITY WITH WORK

By executing this Agreement, CONSULTANT represents that CONSULTANT: (i) has thoroughly investigated and considered the Services to be performed; (ii) has carefully considered how the Services should be provided; and (iii) fully understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending the provision of the Services under this Agreement. Should CONSULTANT discover any latent or unknown conditions materially differing from those inherent in the provision of such Services or as represented by ANAHEIM, CONSULTANT shall immediately inform ANAHEIM of such fact and shall not proceed except at CONSULTANT's risk until written instructions are received from ANAHEIM.

9. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR

9.1 Neither ANAHEIM nor any of its employees shall have any control over the manner, mode or means by which CONSULTANT, its agents or employees, perform the services required herein, except as otherwise set forth herein. Except as expressly provided herein, ANAHEIM shall have no voice in the selection, discharge, supervision or control of CONSULTANT's employees, servants, representatives or agents, or in fixing their number, compensation or hours of service. CONSULTANT shall perform all services required herein as an independent contractor of ANAHEIM and shall remain at all times as to ANAHEIM a wholly independent contractor with only such obligations as are consistent with that role. CONSULTANT shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its agents or employees are agents or employees of ANAHEIM. ANAHEIM shall not in any way or for any purpose become or be deemed to be a partner of CONSULTANT in its business or otherwise or a joint venture or a member of any joint enterprise with CONSULTANT.

9.2 In consideration for the compensation paid to CONSULTANT by ANAHEIM, CONSULTANT agrees that ANAHEIM shall not be liable or responsible for any benefits, including, but not limited to, worker's compensation, disability, retir ement, life, unemployment, health or any other benefits and CONSULTANT agrees that it shall not sue or file a claim, petition or application therefore against ANAHEIM or any of its officers, employees, agents, representatives or sureties.

6 10. INSURANCE

10.1 .Without limiting ANAHEIM’S right to indemnification, it is agreed that CONSULTANT shall secure, prior to commencing any activities under this Agreement, and maintain, during the term of this Agreement, insurance coverage as follows:

.01 Workers' Compensation Insurance as required by California law and Employers Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence/accident/illness/injury.

.02 Commercial General Liability Insurance, including coverage for Premises and Operations, Contractu al Liability, Personal Injury Liability, Products/Completed Operations Liability, as well as Independent CONSULTANT’S Liability where appropriate, in an amount not less than $2,000,000 per occurrence, $4,000,000 annual aggregate, written on an occurrence form. Such insurance shall be written on a primary basis but may include a deductible or self-insured retention of more than $10,000 per occurrence, provided that such deductible or self-insured retention is disclosed to ANAHEIM, in writing, at the inception of this Agreement.

.03 Comprehensive Automobile Liability Coverage including —as applicable—owned, non -owned, and hired autos, in an amount not less than $2,000,000 per occurrence, combined single limit, as required by California law.

.04 Professional Liability Insurance, inclusive of Cyber Liability Insurance, in an amount not less than $2,000,000 per occurrence or per claim. Such insurance shall be written on a primary basis, but may include a deductible or self-insured retention of more than $10,000 per occurrence, provided that such deductible or self -insured retention is disclosed to ANAHEIM, in writing, at the inception of this Agreement.

10.2 Any required coverage written with primary and excess layers to satisfy the minimum requirements of this Agreement must be submitted for approval by ANAHEIM’s Risk Manager prior to the inception of the final Agreement.

CONSULTANT agrees that this insurance shall not be voluntarily cancelled by CONSULTANT, or limited in scope or coverage by CONSULTANT, until after thirty (30) days prior written notice has been given to the City Clerk, City of Anaheim, 200 S. Anaheim Blvd., Anaheim, CA 92805. This does not apply to cancellation for non -payment of premium, which requires notice of not less than ten (10) days.

.01 "It is agreed that any insurance maintained by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement shall be primary to, and not contribute with, any insurance or self - insurance maintained by the City of Anaheim."

.02 "The City of Anaheim, its officers, agents, employees, representatives and ANAHEIM-designated volunteers are added as additional insureds as respects the acts, omissions, operations and activities of, or on behalf of, the named insured, in regard to products supplied to, or work or services performed for, or related to, the City of Anaheim."

7 10.4 Prior to commencing any work under this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall deliver to ANAHEIM insurance certificates confirming the existence of the insurance required under this Agreement, and including the applicable clauses referenced above. Also, within thirty (30) days of the execution date of this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall provide ANAHEIM (i) endorsements to the insurance policies that add to these policies the applicable clauses referenced above, or (ii) in lieu of said endorsements, documentation acceptable to ANAHEIM evidencing that the coverage, terms, and conditions set forth in the above -referenced clauses are otherwise included in said insurance policies. Insurance required hereunder shall be placed with insurers (i) admitted to write insurance in Californi a, (ii) possessing an A. M. Best’s rating of A VII or higher, or (iii) otherwise acceptable to ANAHEIM, with prior written permission from ANAHEIM. In the event that a claim or other legal action is filed against ANAHEIM, and if ANAHEIM, in its good faith opinion, believes it may have coverage under any of the insurance required herein, then ANAHEIM has the right to demand, and to receive within a reasonable time period, copies of the insurance policies related to such required insurance; provided, however, that this provision shall not apply if the parties agree that CONSULTANT shall fully defend, hold harmless, and indemnify ANAHEIM against any such claim or other legal action.

.01 Order CONSULTANT to stop work under this Agreement and/or withhold any payment(s) which become due to CONSULTANT hereunder until CONSULTANT demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof; or

.02 Terminate this Agreement.

Exercise of any of the above remedies, however, is an alternative to other remedies ANAHEIM may have and is not the exclusive remedy for CONSULT ANT's failure to maintain insurance or secure appropriate endorsements.

10.6 Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which CONSULTANT may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from CONSULTANT's, (or CONSULTANT's contractors/subcontractor, if any) performance of the work covered under this Agreement.

10.7 In the event CONSULTANT hires other persons or firms to perform some of the work related to this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall ensure (i ) that the acts or omissions of such persons or firms are covered under the above -referenced liability insurance, or (ii) that such firms maintain insurance equal to or better than, and subject to the same limits, terms and conditions as, the insurance req uired of CONSULTANT under this Agreement (except for firms that are not performing professional services—such firms shall not be required to carry the above- referenced professional liability insurance); and in either instance, CONSULTANT shall provide, or cause to be provided, evidence of such insurance coverage, reasonably acceptable to ANAHEIM.

10.8 ANAHEIM’S Risk Manager is hereby authorized to amend the requirements set forth herein in the event that such reduction is in ANAHEIM’S best interest.

8 11. INDEMNIFICATION

11.1 As respects acts, errors or omissions in the performance of professional services, CONSULTANT agrees to indemnify and hold harmless ANAHEIM, its officials, officers, and employees from and against any and all claims, losses, damages, defense costs, or liability, of any kind or nature, directly arising out of the negligent acts, errors or omissions of the CONSULTANT or any SUB -AGENT in the performance of professional services under this Agreement.

11.2 As respects all acts, errors or omissions that do not arise directly out of the performance of professional services, including but not limited to those acts, errors or omissions typically covered by general and automobile liability insurance, CONSULTANT agrees to indemnify, defend (at ANAHEIM'S option), and hold harmless ANAHEIM, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and representatives from and against any and all claims, losses, damages, defense costs, or liability, of any kind or nature (collectively referred to hereinafter as “ Claims”), arising out of or in connection with CONSULTANT’S (or CONSULTANT'S AGENT or SUB - AGENT, if any) acts, errors, omissions, or work, relative to this Agreement; except for those Claims that arise out of the sole negligence or willful misconduct of ANAHEIM.

11.3 The obligations set forth in this indemnification provision (i) shall be in effect without regard to whether or not ANAHEIM, CONSULTANT, or any other person maintains, or fails to maintain, insurance coverage, or a self -insurance program, for any such Claims; and (ii) shall survive the termination of this Agreement.

12. PREVAILING WAGES

Where required pursuant to the provisions of the State of California Labor Code or the Davis Bacon Act, not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages including legal holidays, and overtime work for each craft or type of workman needed to execute the work contemplated under this Agreement, shall be paid to all workmen employed on the work to be done according to this contract by CONSULTANT or any approve d Subcontractor, and shall be deemed to include employer payments for health and welfare, pension, vacation and similar purposes. If both the Davis-Bacon Act and State of California prevailing wage laws apply and the federal and state prevailing rate of per diem wages differ, CONSULTANT and Subcontractor, if any, shall pay the higher of the two rates. Said prevailing rate of per diem wages are on file at the City of Anaheim, Office of the City Clerk, 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California 92805, and are available to any interested party on request.

13. PROGRESS

CONSULTANT is responsible for keeping the Project Administrator and/or his/her duly authorized designee informed on a regular basis regarding the status and progress of the Services, activities performed and planned, and any meetings that have been scheduled or are desired.

14. PROHIBITION AGAINST ASSIGNMENTS AND TRANSFERS

The Parties recognize that a substantial inducement to ANAHEIM for entering into this Agreement is the professional reputation, experience and competence of CONSULTANT.

Neither the whole nor any interest in, nor any of the rights or privileges granted under th is 9 Agreement shall be assigned, transferred or encumbered in any way without the prior written consent of ANAHEIM. Any such purported assignment, transfer, encumbrance, pledge, subuse, or permission given without such consent shall be void as to ANAHEIM. If ANAHEIM approves an assignment or transfer, this Agreement and the covenants and conditions contained herein shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of and shall apply to the permitted successors and assigns of CONSULTANT.

15. SUBCONTRACTING

Except for those subcontractors set forth in the Scope of Services, if any, CONSULTANT shall not subcontract any portion of the work to be performed under this Agreement without the prior written authorization of ANAHEIM. CONSULTANT shall be fully responsible to ANAHEIM for all acts and omissions of any approved subcontractor. Nothing in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between ANAHEIM and subcontractor nor shall it create any obligation on the part of ANAHEIM to pay or to see to the payment of any monies due to any such subcontractor other than as otherwise required by law. ANAHEIM is an intended beneficiary of any work performed by any subcontractor for purposes of establishing a duty of care between the subcontractor and ANAHEIM pursuant to this Agreement.

16. USE AND OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS AND DATA

16.1 ANAHEIM shall furnish to CONSULTANT such documents and materials as may be relevant and pertinent to the provision of services hereunder as ANAHEIM may possess or acquire.

16.2 All documents and materials furnished by ANAHEIM to CONSULTANT pursuant to Section 16.1 shall remain the property of ANAHEIM and shall be returned to ANAHEIM upon termination of this Agreement, for any reason. All documents or material prepared or caused to be prepared by CONSULTANT, its officers, employees, agents and subcontractors, in the course of implementing this Agreement, shall, upon payment to CONSULTANT, become the exclusive property of ANAHEIM, and ANAHEIM shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion without further compensation to CONSULTANT or any other party. During the course of this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall, at CONSULTANT's sole cost and expense, provide such documents and material to ANAHEIM upon prior written request.

Documents and material prepared by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement are not intended or represented to be suitable for reuse by ANAHEIM or others on any other project. Any use of completed documents for other projects and any use of incomplete documents without specific written authorization from CONSULTANT will be at ANAHEIM's sole risk and without liability to CONSULTANT. Further, any and all liability arising out of changes made to CONSULTANT's deliverables under this Agreement by ANAHEIM or persons other than CONSULTANT, is waived against CONSULTANT and ANAHEIM assumes full responsibility for such changes unless ANAHEIM has given CONSULTANT prior notice and has received from CONSULTANT written consent for such changes.

17. CONFIDENTIALITY

All documents, including drafts, preliminary drawings or plans, notes, ideas and communications that result from the Services provided under this Agreement, shall be kept confidential by CONSULTANT and are subject to the attorney -client privilege and/or may be 10 attorney work product, unless ANAHEIM authorizes, in writing, the release of said information.

18. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INDEMNITY

CONSULTANT shall defend and indemnify ANAHEIM, its agents, officers, representatives and employees against any and all liability, including costs, for infringement of any United States' letters patent, trademark, or copyright infringement, including costs, contained in the work product or documents provided by CONSULTANT to ANAHEIM pursuant to this Agreement.

19. RECORDS

CONSULTANT shall keep records and invoices in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to the costs incurred under this Agreement and any services, expendit ures and disbursements charged to ANAHEIM, for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to CONSULTANT under this Agreement.

All such records and invoices shall be clearly identifiable. CONSULTANT shall allow a representative of ANAHEIM to examine, audit and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement during regular business hours.

CONSULTANT shall allow inspection of all work, data, Documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment to CONSULTANT under this Agreement.

20. WITHHOLDINGS

ANAHEIM may withhold payment to CONSULTANT of any disputed sums until satisfaction of the dispute with respect to such payment. Such withholding shall not be deemed to constitute a failure to pay according to the terms of this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall not discontinue work as a result of such withholding. CONSULTANT shall have an immediate right to appeal to the City Manager or his Designee with respect to such disputed sums and his/her decision shall be final. CONSULTANT shall be entitled to receive interest on any withheld sums at the rate of return that ANAHEIM earned on its in vestments during the time period, from the date of withholding of any amounts found to have been improperly withheld.

21. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS

In the event of errors or omissions that are due to the negligence of CONSULTANT, CONSULTANT shall immediately, at no cost to ANAHEIM, perform professional services necessary to correct any such negligent errors or omissions in the work accomplished by CONSULTANT. Nothing in this paragraph is intended to limit ANAHEIM's rights under the law or any other sections of this Agreement

22. ANAHEIM'S RIGHT TO EMPLOY OTHER CONSULTANTS

CONSULTANT acknowledges and agrees that this Agreement and the provision of services hereunder are nonexclusive and that ANAHEIM may enter into similar agreements with other entities for the provision of similar services.

11 23. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

CONSULTANT or its employees may be subject to the provisions of the California Political Reform Act of 1974 (the "Act"), which: (1) requires such persons to disclose any financial interest that may foreseeably be materially affected by the work performed under this Agreement; and (2) prohibits such persons from making, or participating in making, decisions that will foreseeably financially affect such interest.

If subject to the Act, CONSULTANT shall conform to all requirements of the Act.

Failure to do so constitutes a material breach and is grounds for immediate termination of this Agreement by ANAHEIM. CONSULTANT shall indemnify and hold harmless ANAHEIM for any and all claims for damages resulting from CONSULTANT’s violation of this Section.

24. NOTICES

All notices, demands or other writings to be made, given or sent hereunder, or which may be so given or made or sent by either ANAHEIM or CONSULTANT to the other shall be deemed to have been given when in writing and personally delivered or if mailed on the third (3rd) day after being deposited in the United States mail, certified or registered, postage prepaid, and addressed to the respective Parties at the following addresses:

If to ANAHEIM: City Clerk
City of Anaheim
200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, 2nd Floor
Anaheim, California 92805
FAX No. (714) 765-4105
With copies to: Office of the City Attorney
City of Anaheim
200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, 3rd Floor
Anaheim, California 92805
FAX No. (714) 765-5123

To CONSULTANT:

Zachary Rudman, Chief Legal officer
Populous, Inc.
4800 Main Street, Suite 300
Kansas City, Missouri 64112
Phone: (816) 221-1500

25. ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT

25.1 Events of Default.

.01 For purposes of this Section 25, the word "Default" shall mean the failure of CONSULTANT to perform any of CONSULTANT's duties or obligations or the breach by CONSULTANT of any of the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. In addition, CONSULTANT shall be deemed to be in Default upon CONSULTANT's (i) application for, 12 consent to, or suffering of, the appointment of a receiver, trustee or liquidator for all or a substantial portion of its assets; (ii) making a general assignment for the benefit of creditors; (iii) being adjudged bankrupt; (iv) filing a voluntary petition or suffering an involuntary petition under any bankruptcy, arrangement, reorganization or insolvency law (unless in the case of an involuntary petition, the same is dismissed within thirty (30) days of such filing); or (v) suffering or permitting to continue unstayed and in effect for fifteen (15) consecutive days any attachment, levy, execution or seizure of all or a substantial portion of CONSULTANT's assets or of CONSULTANT's interests hereunder.

.02 ANAHEIM shall not be deemed to be in Default in the performance of any obligation required to be performed by ANAHEIM hereunder unless and until ANAHEIM has failed to perform such obligation for a period of thirty (30) days after receipt of written notice from CONSULTANT specifying in reasonable detail the nature and extent of any such failure; provided, however, that if the nature of ANAHEIM's obligation is such that more than thirty (30) days are required for its performance, then ANAHEIM shall not be deemed to be in Default if ANAHEIM shall commence to cure such performance within such thirty (30) day period and thereafter diligently prosecute the same to completion.

25.2 Immediate Termination for CONSULTANT's Default. CONSULTANT shall not be deemed to be in Default in the performance of any obligation required to be performed by CONSULTANT hereunder unless and until CONSULTANT has failed to perform such obligation for a period of thirty (30) days after receipt of written notice from ANAHEIM specifying in reasonable detail the nature and extent of any such failure; provided, however, that if the nature of CONSULTANT's obligation is such that more than thirty (30) days are required for its performance, then CONSULTANT shall not be deemed to be in Default if CONSULTANT shall commence to cure such performance within such thirty (30) day period and thereafter diligently prosecute the same to completion.

25.3 Termination without Cause. ANAHEIM may terminate this Agreement at any time without the necessity of cause or Default by giving thirty (30) days' notice in writing to CONSULTANT. In such event, the Parties shall have no further rights hereunder, except that CONSULTANT shall be paid for all services rendered in accordance with the terms of this Agreement prior to such termination and shall receive payment in full for equipment and equipment that has been ordered that cannot be canceled. CONSULTANT may not terminate this Agreement except for cause.

26. COMPLIANCE WITH ALL LAWS

CONSULTANT shall at its own cost and expe nse comply with all applicable statutes, ordinances, regulations and requirements of all governmental entities, including federal, state, county or municipal, whether now in force or enacted during the term of this Agreement. In addition, all work prepared by CONSULTANT shall conform to applicable local, county, state and federal laws, rules, regulations and permit requirements and be subject to approval of the Project Administrator.

27. WAIVER

A waiver by either Party of any breach, of any term, covenant or condition contained herein shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other term, covenant or condition contained herein, whether of the same or a different character. 13 28. INTEGRATED CONTRACT

This Agreement and the exhibits hereto contain the entire agreement of ANAHEIM and CONSULTANT with respect to the matters covered hereby, and no agreement, statement or promise made by either ANAHEIM or CONSULTANT which is not contained herein, shall be valid or binding. No prior agreement, understanding or representation pertaining to any such matter shall be effective for any purpose.

29. CONFLICTS OR INCONSISTENCIES

In the event there are any conflicts or inconsistencies between this Agreement and the Exhibits or any other attachments attached hereto, the terms of this Agreement shall govern.

30. INTERPRETATION

Each Party acknowledges that he / she / it has had the benefit of advice of competent legal counsel with respect to its decision to enter this Agreement. The provisions of this Agreement shall be interpreted to give effect to their fair meaning and shall be construed as prepared by both Parties.

31. AMENDMENTS

This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written document executed by both CONSULTANT and ANAHEIM and approved as to form by the City Attorney.

32. SEVERABILITY

If any term or provision of this Agreement or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall, to any extent, be held invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement, or the application of its terms and provisions to persons and circumstances other than those to which it has been held invalid or unenforceable shall not be affected thereby, and each term and provision of this Agreement shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law.

33. REMEDIES CUMULATIVE

The remedies given to ANAHEIM and CONSULTANT herein shall be cumulative and are given without impairing any other rights given ANAHEIM or CONSULTANT by statute or law now existing or hereafter enacted and the exercise on any one (1) remedy by ANAHEIM or CONSULTANT shall not exclude the exercise of any other remedy.

34. NO THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES

The Parties intend that no rights nor remedies be granted to any third party as a beneficiary of this Agreement or of any covenant, duty, obligation or undertaking established herein.
14 35. CONTROLLING LAW AND VENUE

The laws of the State of California shall govern this Agreement and all matters relating to it and any action brought relating to th is Agreement shall be adjudicated in a court of competent jurisdiction in the County of Orange.

36. DISCRIMINATION

CONSULTANT agrees not to discriminate against any person or class of persons by reason of sex, color, race, creed, religion, marital status, handicap, ancestry, national origin or other prohibited basis in its provision of Services or hiring of subcontractors or employees. To the extent this Agreement provides that CONSULTANT offer accommodations or services to the public, such accommodations or services shall be offered by CONSULTANT to the public on fair and reasonable terms.

37. AUTHORITY

Each individual executing this Agreement on behalf of a corporation, nonprofit corporation, partnership or other entity or organization, represents and warran ts the he or she is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of such entity or organization and that this Agreement is binding upon the same in accordance with its terms. CONSULTANT shall, at ANAHEIM's request, deliver a certified copy of it governing board's resolution or certificate authorizing or evidencing such execution.

38. EFFECTIVE DATE

This Agreement shall be effective on the date on which this Agreement is executed by ANAHEIM ("Effective Date").

[Remainder of page intentionally left blank; signatures on next page] 15 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed on the dates hereinafter respectively set forth.

DATE OF EXECUTION: CITY OF ANAHEIM
a municipal corporation

By:

“ANAHEIM”
ATTEST:

By: _
City Clerk of Anaheim

DATE OF EXECUTION: POPULOUS, INC., a Missouri corporation

By:

Printed Name:

Title:

“CONSULTANT”

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

ROBERT FABELA, CITY ATTORNEY

By:

Bryn M. Morley
Deputy City Attorney

Dated:
148652.3
Attachments: Exhibit A
Exhibit B

Request For Proposals (RFP)

Angel Stadium of Anaheim

Property Condition Assessment

Angel Stadium of Anaheim
2000 Gene Autry Way
Anaheim, CA 92806

Key RFP Dates
RFP Issuance Date Wednesday, February 15,
2023
Mandatory Site Visit/Tour:*
Monday, February 27, 2023,
9:00 AM Pacific Daylight
Time
Deadline for Bidder Questions:

Tuesday, March 7, 2023,
2:00 PM Pacific Daylight
Time
City response to questions: Tuesday, March 14, 2023
RFP Submittal Due:

Monday, March 20, 2023,
2:00 PM Pacific Daylight
Time
Selection of Most Qualified Firm: Monday, April 3, 2023 Facility Assessment Start Date: Thursday, April 27, 2023

*Representative of Firm MUST attend the Mandatory Site Visit/Tour in order to submit a proposal

NOTE: City reserves the right to adjust timeline as necessary to meet City Council schedule Exhibit A
2 NOTICE INVITING PROPOSALS

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that proposals will be received from qualified firms for an Angel Stadium of Anaheim, Property Condition Assessment (“Project”). Responses to this Request for Proposals (RFP) will be accepted until Monday, March 20, 2023 by 2:00 p.m. Proposals received after this date/time will not be accepted. It is the responsibility of the Consultant to ensure that any proposals are submitted prior to this proposal due date and time.

Respondents must register with the City of Anaheim web portal in order to participate in this Project. There is no cost to create an account to view City of Anaheim projects if registering via www.anaheim.net/vendorportal
.

Information on this RFP and any addenda will be available on the following website:
www.anaheim.net/vendorportal RFP # 515- Angel-Stadium-of-Anaheim-Property- Condition-Assessment-02-15-2023.

Please submit your RFP response digitally via the City’s Planet Bids Vendor Portal, www.anaheim.net/vendorportal RFP # 515-Angel-Stadium-of-Anaheim- Property-Condition-Assessment-02-15-2023, by Monday, March 20, 2023, at 2:00 PM Pacific Daylight Time in the following format:
• Must contain a cover page with the name of the firm, date of submission and the words, “Angel Stadium of Anaheim Property Condition Assessment RFP # 515- Angel-Stadium-of-Anaheim-Property-Condition-Assessment-02-15-2023.” • Proposed Business Plan (created using bidders individual format) • Appendix 5 completed Proposal Form signed by an officer of the company that has contract signatory powers, i.e., President, Vice-President, or an individual authorized by corporate resolution or company by-laws which shall be the first page of the .pdf copy of the Proposal
• Letter-sized, 8-½ x 11in portrait format for text pages • Any spreadsheets, PowerPoints, or diagrams can be letter-sized, landscape format if necessary
• All text should be black
• Free from excessive graphics or photos
• Provide a .pdf copy of a Property Condition Assessment for a similar project your firm prepared as a sample of your work

3 Mandatory Site Visit/Tour will be held at Angels Stadium of Anaheim at:

Date: Monday, February 27, 2023
Start Time: 9:00 AM Pacific Standard Time (tour expected to last approx. 3 hours) Address:

Angel Stadium of Anaheim
2000 E. Gene Autry Way
Anaheim, CA 92806
Meeting Location: Meet under the “Big A” near the 57 freeway

Representative of Firm MUST attend the Mandatory Site Visit/Tour in order to submit a proposal.
4 City of ANAHEIM
Request For Proposals (RFP)
Angel Stadium of Anaheim
Property Condition Assessment

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. GENERAL
II. PROPOSAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
III. INSTRUCTIONS TO CONSULTANTS
IV. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
V. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS
VI. PROPOSAL REVIEW (CONSULTANT SELECTION)
VII. AWARD OF AGREEMENT
VIII. IMPLEMENTATION
IX. PUBLIC RECORDS
X. APPENDIX
APPENDIX 1: SCOPE OF WORK
APPENDIX 2: STANDARD AGREEMENT
APPENDIX 3: INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
APPENDIX 4: CONFLICT OF INTEREST
APPENDIX 5: FEE PROPOSAL FORM

5 I. GENERAL

Nature of Work:

The City of Anaheim is seeking a consultant to provide an Angel Stadium of Anaheim, Property Condition Assessment . A detailed Scope of Work is included in Appendix 1 of this RFP.

II. PROPOSAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS

By submitting a Proposal, the Consultant acknowledges that it has thoroughly examined and accepts the Terms and Conditions of this RFP as described below:

A. EXAMINATION: Consultant represents that it has thoroughly examined and become familiar with the services and responsibilities required of this RFP and that it is capable of effectively and efficiently performing quality work to achieve the City’s objectives. Any attachments referenced herein or any interpretations, clarifications or amendments subsequently posted in the relation to this RFP are fully incorporated.

B. EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT : The City and the selected Consultant will enter into an Agreement similar to the Sample Agreement in Appendix 2. If a Consultant is unwilling or unable to execute an Agreement within thirty (30) days after being notified of selection under this RFP, the City reserves the right to select the next most qualified Consultant or call for new Proposals, whichever the City deems most appropriate.

C. PROPOSAL VALIDITY : Services, pricing and warranties indicat ed in a respondent’s Proposal must be valid for a period of 120 days after the submission of the Proposal.

D. PRE-CONTRACTUAL EXPENSES: Anaheim shall not, in any event, be liable for any pre- contractual expenses incurred by Consultant s in the preparation of its proposal.

E. JOINT OFFERS/SUBCONSULTANTS : Where two or more Consultant s desire to submit a single Proposal in response to this RFP, they should do so on a prime-subconsultant basis. The City intends to contract with a single firm and not with multiple firms doing business as a joint venture. Should the use of subconsultants be offered, the Prime Consultant shall provide the same assurances of competence for t he subconsultant plus the demonstrated ability to manage and supervise the subcontracted work.

Subconsultants shall not be allowed to further subcontract with others for work under the Agreement. The provisions of the Agreement shall apply to all subconsultants in the same manner as the Prime Consultant.

6 III. INSTRUCTIONS TO CONSULTANTS

A. CITY RESPONSIBILITIES
The City will provide information in its possession relevant to the preparation of required information in RFP. The City will provide only the staff assistance and documentation specifically referred to herein.

B. CONSULTANT RESPONSIBILITIES
Point of Contact : The selected Consultant will assume responsibility for all services in its proposal. The selected Consultant shall identify a sole point of contact with the greatest knowledge in regard to the required service operations and contractual matters, including payment of any and all charges resulting from the Agreement.

The Consultant shall be responsible for collec ting and disseminating the data, records, and documents in the preparation of all design documents.

The Consultant is expected to establish and maintain a close working relationship with City staff throughout the project.

The selected Consultant shall maintain the same Project Manager for the duration of the project, as specified in the approved proposal. In the event the authorized Project Manager terminates employment, the Consultant shall make a demonstrated and concentrated effort to maintain the Project Manager in the key managerial position, unless extreme co nditions prohibit continuance. After contract execution, any substitution of the Project Manager is discouraged and the replacement must be a licensed architect or engineer in California and wil l require written City approval. The Consultant shall perform not less than 50 % (contract amount) of the work with its own work force.

Any changes in the scope of work resulting in a contract increase or decrease in fee shall be approved, in writing, by the City prior to the commencement of an actual change of work. No fee adjustment shall be allowed unless it is based on said prior written approval.

C. REQUEST FOR INFORMATION OR CLARIFICATION
All questions or requested clarifications shall be made in writing via the PlanetBids Portal. The consultants are prohibited from communicating with any City representative/employee/official/consultant/staff other than via the PlanetBids Portal. Only questions and answers responded to on PlanetBids or any addendums issued on PlanetBids will be a part of this RFP solicitation.

Consultants may submit written questions concerning this RFP on PlanetBids per the Key RFP Dates on the title page. Questions will not be able to be submitted after the stated deadline.

D. ADDENDA
Any changes in the RFP from the date of release to the due date of submittal will result in an addendum or amendment. Participants will receive notification of such addendum or amendment via the PlanetBids project listing.

7 E. LICENSES & PERMITS
The selected Consultant shall be required to obtain a City of Anaheim Business license within ten (10) business days of the effective date of the Agreement and must provide a copy to the City P roject Manager or designee prior to commencing any work in Anaheim.

Additionally, the Consultant will be responsible for obtaining any licenses/permits required by the Scope of Work.

F. INSURANCE
The selected Consultant shall be required to obtain and submit insurance coverage and provide indemnification and hold harmless provisions in favor of the City of Anaheim as described in Appendix 3.

G. CITY RIGHT TO REJECT
The City reserves the right to reject any or all submitted proposals when such rejection is in the interest of the City to reject the Proposal of the Consultant who has not met the prerequisites of the RFP, who has previously failed to perform properly or complete on time contracts of a similar nature; and to reject the proposal of the Consultant who is, in the opinion of City, in a position unable to perform the contract. The City also reserves the right to waive any information and technicalities in the RFP. All costs incurred in the preparation of the proposal, in the submission of additional information and/or in any other aspect of a proposal prior to the award of a written contract will be borne by the Consultant. The City will only provide the staff assistance and documentation specifically referred to herein, and will not be responsible for any other cost or obligation that may be incurred by the Consultant. All proposals submitted to the City shall become the property of the City of Anaheim.

IV. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

A. GENERAL

1. Proposal Submittal and signature: Refer to Section I: General.

2. Deadline: Proposals are due to the City of Anaheim, at the date, time, and location set forth above in the Notice Inviting Proposals and Key RFP Dates.

B. PROPOSAL CONTENTS
All proposals shall be limited to a MAXIMUM of 50 pages, including appendices, charts, pictures, tables, schedule, resource allocation table and resumes but excluding addendum acknowledgements , sample property condition assessment report, Fee P roposal Form (Appendix 5), and Conflict of Interest Form (Appendix 4). The Proposal shall be on Letter sheets (8.5"x11"). Font size shall be minimum 11-point Arial.

1. STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS

The Statement of Qualifications may include the following:

8 a. Cover Letter: Proposals shall include a letter signed by a principal or authorized representative who can make legally binding commitments for the entity. Include address, telephone, email address , and type of business entity.

b. Agreement Statement: Proposals shall include a statement outlining your concurrence or concerns with any and all provisions as contained in the standard agreement in Appendix 2 of this RFP.

c. Firm and Team Experience: Proposals shall include a profile of the firm’s experience. Include resumes of project team/sub- consultants that outline their technical and property condition assessment experience. At a minimum, this should include the project manager/principal agent, associates in charge when project manager/principal agent is unavailable, key personnel, firm size, and an organization chart identifying only those who will perform work for the proposed project and the percentage of each individual’s time devoted to this project. The project manager/principal agent shall be the primary contact person to represent your firm. Provide a demonstrated record of success by the consultant on work previously performed for the City, other municipalities, or other enterprises.

The Co nsultant’s organization and all associated Consultants and subconsultants must be identified at the time of the proposal. If the Consultant wishes to use a subconsultant not specified in the proposal, prior written approval must be obtained from the City . The subcontract must contain all required provisions of the prime contract.

d. Understanding o f Need : Proposal s shall include an outline which demonstrates the firm’s understanding of the scope of work. This outline should include an anticipated approach, tasks necessary for successful completion, and suggestions or special concerns that the City should be made aware of. Proposal must articulate a thorough understanding of the scope of work, and any relevant local, State and Federal requirements.

e. Relevant Project Experience: Proposal shall include a list of projects which your firm or personnel have completed within the last 5 years, including significant work with public agencies . Project information should include project description, year completed, and client name, along with a person to contact, a telephone number, and email address.

Consulting firm must demonstrate it has performed at least one (1) property condition assessment during the last five years of a venue hosting a major professional sports team (i.e., Major League Baseball, National Football League, National Hockey League, National Basketball Association, Major League Soccer).

9 f. Quality Control / Quality Assurance: Provide a description of your Quality Assurance and Quality Control process / procedures and explain how it will ensure quality work and an on-time product delivery.

g. Project Controls: Describe your firm’s ability to control costs and provide accurate and timely invoices through internal control measures; to monitor and stay within budget; to monitor schedule and review times and describe the techniques used to complete projects within the proposed time frames.

2. SCOPE OF SERVICES & SCHEDULE

The Proposal shall detail the work phases to be completed, the tasks to be accomplished and the deliverables to be provided in order to satisfy the Scope of Work in Appendix 1. Consultants may itemize those additional services which are further required in the servicing of the project but are not noted in this RFP as requirements. Consultants shall title this section as ADDITIONAL SERVICES.

In addition, provide a detailed schedule. The detailed schedule shall identify all pertinent tasks, time required to complete each task, milestones, time for City review (use 15 calendar days for each review), time for revising drafts, and tentative completion date to complete the assessment.

3. FEE PROPOSAL

A copy of the signed Fee Proposal shall be the first page of the .pdf copy of the Proposal (Appendix 5).

A list of fees and expenses, including all incidental printing, photocopying and miscellaneous costs estimated to be accrued during the life of the contract must be provided in the reimbursable costs. Total proposed fees, including the consultant’s and any sub- consultant’s hourly rate schedules, shall be submitted with the proposal. The schedule of fees will remain in effect for the duration of the Project.

All work is to be invoiced to the City in accordance with this proposal and the Agreement for Consultant Services. The City will make payments no more than once monthly on approved invoices up to the negotiated fee. The i nvoice shall be reviewed and signed by the Consultant Project Manager certifying its accuracy. Consultant shall not proceed with any additional scope items without an approved addendum executed by the City.

Invoices should include, at minimum, all of the following:
• Prepared on the Consultant’s letterhead;
• Signed by the Consultant’s project manager;
• Have a unique invoice number;
10 • Appropriate documentation attached for all cost and reimbursements;
• If the contract involved milestones, each milestone should be invoiced separately;
• If the contract involved subconsultants, a separate invoice for each subconsultant should be attached in the same format as the prime Consultant’s invoice and should be included in the summary of the prime Consultant’s invoice;
• A summary of the reimbursements to-date and a summary of the funds remaining in the contract. This should be compared to the local agency’s own record of reimbursements to- date and a summary of the funds remaining in the contract;
• A summary of all payments to- date and funds remaining in the contract for each subconsultant.

V. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS

Architectural, Engineering or Consulting firm who has performed at least one (1) property condition assessment during the last five years of a venue hosting a major professional sports team (i.e., Major League Baseball, National Football League, National Hockey League, National Basketball Association, Major League Soccer).

SELECTION PROCESS and EVALUATION CRITERIA

An evaluation team, composed of representatives of t he City, will evaluate proposals on a variety of quantitative and qualitative criteria. Upon receipt of proposals, the City will review to determine whether the proposal is acceptable or non-acceptable based on the criteria outlined below.

VI. PROPOSAL REVIEW (CONSULTANT SELECTION)

An internal Review Board selected by the City will review the proposals received. The final ranking of the consultants will be based upon qualifications evaluated from on the criteria below. The criteria and their associated weights, upon which the evaluation of the proposals will be based includes, but is not limited to, the following (see following page):

11 Criteria Max
Points Rating
Quality of the Proposed Approach to the Scope of Work (3 0 points) – Understanding and discussion of technical
challenges/issues; methodology and technical plan of operations; innovation and thoroughness in work approach; project management plan, work flow, reporting, and quality assurance procedures. 30 Experience and Qualifications of Proposer (30 points) – Company background and history; relevant experience with similar projects; client references. Adequacy of resources; understanding of task sequencing and major milestone events.

All team members, including subconsultants, shall be clearly identified in the firm/team’s proposal. Proposals should clearly identify the project manager and include that person’s resume and relevant experience with similar projects. The dedication of time (as a percentage of available weekly work hours) to be spent on the project by the project manager should also be included. Finally, state the names of persons, their respective titles/roles, resumes, and dedication of time for any team member who will play a significant role in this project.
30 Cost (25 points) – Total cost to City for this project. 25 Example Report (15 points) – The example report provided will be evaluated for thoroughness and compatibility with City’s goals for this project.
15 Total 100

Upon completion of the qualifications -based evaluation and ranking of proposals, the City will initiate negotiations with the most highly qualified firm to arrive at a fair and reasonable compensation given the proposed scope of work. If the City and the f irm are unable to negotiate a contract, the City may terminate negotiations and initiate negotiations with the next most qualified firm.

VII. AWARD OF AGREEMENT

A. CONTRACT AWARD
Following the evaluation and rating by the proposal Review Board, the City of Anaheim’s City Attorney’s Office and Convention, Sports & Entertainment Department will request approval of the agreement with the selected Consultant.

B. EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT
A Sample agreement is included as Appendix 2. The term of the agreement will begin after the agreement is fully executed, and all required bonds, insurance documents have been received and approved and the Notice to Proceed (NTP) has been issued by the City.

12 VIII. IMPLEMENTATION

A. NOTICE TO PROCEED

After execution of the Agreement, a Notice to Proceed (NTP) will be issued to establish the start date of the agreement.

B. KICK-OFF MEETING

A kick-off meeting will be held after the Notice to Proceed has been issued.

Consultant and its team will meet with City of Anaheim staff to conduct introductions, discuss scope of services, and the assessment process

IX. PUBLIC RECORDS

All responses to the RFP shall become property of the City, and proposals will become public record after award of the agreement. Consultant information identified as proprietary information shall be maintained confidential, to the extent allowed under the California Public Records Act.

13 APPENDIX 1

SCOPE OF WORK

Angel Stadium of Anaheim, Property Condition Assessment

The City of Anaheim ("City") is seeking proposals from architectural/engineering firms and/or facility consulting firms interested in performing a property condition assessment for Angel Stadium of A naheim, home of Major League Baseball’s Los Angeles Angels, located at 2000 E Gene Autry Way, Anaheim, CA 92806. The City is seeking firms that have extensive experience completing property condition assessments similar in size and scope to the one described within this Request for Proposal.

I. STADIUM INFORMATION (from mlb.com)

Anaheim Stadium had been the home of the Angels since their move from Los Angeles following the 1965 season. The stadium opened April 9, 1966, as the California Angels hosted the San Francisco Giants in an exhibition game. The franchise's first American League game was April 19, 1966 vs. the Chicago White Sox. The Los Angeles Angels played at Wrigley Field in 1961 and Chavez Ravine from 1962-65.

Renovations to Anaheim Stadium began Oct. 1, 1996, reverting the 30-year old structure back to a baseball -only facility. On Sept. 15, 1997, the renovated stadium's new name was announced: Edison International Field of Anaheim. On Dec. 29, 2003, the Angels announced the stadium would be renamed Angel Stadium of Anaheim. Total cost for the stadium renovation was estimated at $100 million and the project was completed in time for the Anaheim Angels Opening Day, April 1, 1998.

The original Anaheim Stadium seated 43,204 (later 43,250). The s tadium underwent construction in 1979-80 for additional seating to accommodate the Los Angeles Rams of the NFL. Upon completion in 1981, the stadium seated 65,158 (later 64,593) for baseball.

The Rams left Anaheim for St. Louis, MO in 1995. The new Angel S tadium of Anaheim has a seating capacity of approximately 45,050.

II. PROPERTY CONDITION ASSESSMENT

The City seeks to engage the services of a qualified architectural/engineering firm and/or facility management firm to provide a review and assessment of the current and future capital needs of Angel Stadium of Anaheim and to obtain a capital repair, replacement, and improvement program.

The selected firm shall conduct an architectural and engineering assessment of Angel Stadium of Anaheim and prepare documen tation, as described herein, regarding the condition of the venue and recommendations with respect to capital repair and replacement plans and matters relating thereto. The selected firm shall evaluate the condition of the existing facility, document issues or defects based on observations, provide estimates of the expected life of the various components, and recommend items for repair and replacement and the range of associated costs.

14 III. SCOPE OF WORK

The scope of services requested through this RFP will be for the completion of a comprehensive property condition assessment as described herein.

The assessment shall consist of direct observation, review and interpretation of documents, interviews with personnel, input from management and ownership, and evaluation of the actual condition of the major physical elements, systems and operations.

It is expected that the assessment will occur during non- event day(s). The assessment shall be conducted in such a way and at such times as to avoid disrupting the on- going operations of Angel Stadium of Anaheim.

The purpose of the Property Condition Assessment is to establish a baseline on facility’s current condition focusing on infrastructure elements. The condition of the infrastructure will provide 1) an owner with a reasonable set of expectations regarding current condition, future repairs and replacement, and 2) provide cost estimates for future renovations. The proposed comprehensive assessment shall include the following areas:

Architectural
Condition of interior finishes, exterior components, bowl seating Major Systems
Mechanical, electrical, plumbing, fire protection
Structural
Load bearing walls, concrete, exterior sidewalks and façade, light standards, parking lots
Entertainment Electronic Systems
Audio/video, TV production and distribution, interactive displays Operations and Electronic Systems
Security, Telephone/Data/POS, Wi-Fi/DAS System
Food Service, Concessions, Catering, Merchandise
Analyze concessions, vending, quick service stands, and any premium services, in- seat service, catering and merchandise operations
Vertical Transportation
Elevator and escalator function; current operation and ongoing maintenance Roofs
Membranes, water diversion and penetrations
Capital Expense Matrix
Research, develop and deliver a capital expenditure matrix that will assist the owner/operator in budgeting and making capital improvement decisions.

The following are descriptions and examples that apply that describe the scope of wor k for each of the elements of a property condition assessment:

A. Architectural Review

The architectural review of the facility shall consist of the inspection and evaluation of the condition of interior and exterior finishes and general architectur al components of the building. It may also include a review of the functional efficiency of particular areas. This portion of the assessment will:
15 • Provide a review of current conditions of the following:
o Seating
o Team Spaces
o Premium Spaces
o Social Spaces
o Media Spaces
o Event Production Spaces
o Groundskeeping Spaces
o Storage
o Restrooms
o Concourses
o Entry Gate
o Circulation
o Wayfinding
o Metal Cladding and Glazing
o Exterior Features to the Curb Line (Pedestrian Plazas & Walkways)

• Provide an objective view on the functionality of a given space in order to develop recommendations on modifications for improvement

B. Major Systems Reviews

This includes the review of mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and fire protection system.

The following are descriptions and examples of the work in this area:

• Observe and document the physical and operating condition of equipment and systems.

Evaluate each selected system and comment on the following:

• Identification of systems that are not operating as designed or as needed to satisfactorily serve the patrons and users. We will recommend other sequence of control modifications that may reduce operational costs, as applicable.

• Recommendations on preventive maintenance actions to be implemented in the short term and the long term to prolong usef ul life and increase the operating efficiency of the equipment. Based on the remaining useful life of the equipment, recommendations on replacement may be made.

16 C. Structural Review

Evaluate the condition, capacity, suitability and performance of the facility’s structural systems.

Conduct reviews of documents, on-site observations, and conceptual analysis to evaluate the condition, capacity, suitability and performance of the building structural systems.

Structural systems include:

• Catwalks
• Concrete
• Foundations, basement walls and access tunnels
• Fixed seating area
• Structure to support rigging
• Walls supporting roofs
• Exterior sidewalks & façade
• Parking lots

D. Entertainment Electronic Systems Review

In each of the following areas review current condition of equipment, set-up and operation to maximize current performance and possibilities for system upgrades.

• Sound Systems
• Information Displays
• Large Screen Video Displays
• Video Production
• Video Distribution
• Electronic Signage

E. Operations Electronic Systems

Access Control & Monitoring

• Review current perimeter door monitoring (efficiency and potential gaps) • Review access control (card readers) and control points within current facility operations

• Review and discuss current deployment of video surveillance at perimeter points, within the seating bowl, and areas of recent security concern (e.g. air handling areas)
• Review exterior surveillance. Identify obstructed areas, propose solutions (e.g. it is very common for trees to grow and block cameras)
• Identify potential locations where biometric access (e.g.; thumb/palm reader) may be appropriate
• Review exterior support/access points to the project and determine appropriate 17 monitoring and control elements (e.g. manholes, air intakes, etc.) • Review monitoring of building systems such as HVAC units, coolers, etc. • Review extent of surveillance cameras, what they can and cannot see • Review surveillance in regards to operational control (crowds, concessions, cash rooms, commissary) vs. potential external threats such as surrounding streets, entrances, and parking lots

Telecommunications and IT

• Review data backbone topology and media for bandwidth and speed • Review phone system including switch
• Wireless internet systems

F. Food Service, Concessions, Catering and Merchandise Review

• General Food and Beverage Issues
o General wear and tear on facilities and equipment
o Review cleaning and pest control programs
o Review preventative maintenance programs
o Ice machines and other service equipment
o Concession stands and bars
o Counters
o Menu boards
o Cooking and preparation equipment
o Portables
o Point of Sale

• Concession Stands
o Counters and casework
o Cooking and preparation equipment
o Wall and floor finishes

• Commissary and Kitchens
o Cooking and preparation equipment
o Wall and floor finishes

• Team Stores and Portable Merchandise Stands
o General wear and tear on facilities and equipment
o Point of Sale

G. Vertical Transportation Review

This includes the review of escalators and elevators with the following examples of the work in this area:

• Observe and document the physical and operating condition of equipment and systems.
• Evaluate how the systems are actually operating.
18 • Evaluate existing preventive maintenance program.
• Review condition of vertical transportation components. • Provide order of magnitude costs for repair and replacement based on current conditions.

Evaluate each selected system and comment on the following:

• The current physical and operating condition of selected components, equipment, and building systems with an estimate of their remaining useful life. The estimate of remaining useful life will be based on no changes to the current PM program for the respective equipment or system.
• Identification of systems tha t are not operating as designed or as needed to satisfactorily serve the patrons and users. We will recommend other sequence of control modifications that may reduce operational costs, as applicable. • Recommendations on PM actions to be implemented in immediately, and then over the next year, to prolong useful life and increase the operating efficiency of the equipment. Based on the remaining useful life of the equipment, recommendations on replacement may be made.

H. Roofs

Assess the condition of the roofing membranes, penetrations, seams and water diversion devices.

I. Capital Expense Matrix

Provide a 20-year capital expense matrix in a format that can be updated by the City as changes occur in the CPI and construction costs. The capital expense shall be broken down into five (5) year increments and display, at a minimum, each item or system, the frequency of repairs/replacement, the estimated cost in 2023 dollars, as well as each year for that item over the 20 year period utilizing estimated CPI increases as appropriate.

The successful bidder will prioritize each item High, Medium or Low based on the following:

High Priority - items that should be addressed immediately to maintain serviceability due to end of life or o bsolescence and if the associated item’s replacement is needed to maintain the safety of the facility.

Medium Priority - items that should be addressed in the near term to mitigate further deterioration of the item and ensure the overall serviceability is maintained.

Low Priority - items that should be addressed once the high and medium priority items have been repaired or replaced to sustain the overall serviceability for the long-term.

General

It is expected that the assessment will consist of two parts:

19 1. Written report that includes the following:

• Executive Summary
• Methodology and Approach
• Detail for each category assessed which shall include a priority list • Summary of the Capital Expense Plan

2. Capital Expense Plan

• Document that includes detail on item(s) or system(s) and the replacement schedule shown over a 20 year period, broken into 5 year increments, and prioritized High, Medium and Low
• Plan should be provided to City in the native software so that City may manipulate data in the future

REQUIREMENTS

Coordinate with the designated City representative to coordinate timing and schedule.

Endeavor to meet with facility representatives to discuss the current views of the facility, including their primary concerns with regard to:

• Current maintenance issues
• Operational issues - review and prioritize operator’s current working list • Plans for future improvements or updating

DELIVERABLES

Written Narrative

Provide an electronic report of findings with photographic reference and recommendations. Prioritize recommendations based on immediate need, opportunity and understanding of “Best Prac tices” in facility operations. In addition, review specific sections of the Lease Agreement which detail the maintenance responsibilities of the Tenant, including but not limited to the below excerpts from Section 10 and Section 22 of the Lease, and provide an analysis of how these provisions relate to the current condition of Angel Stadium of Anaheim:

“Tenant (Angels Baseball LP) will maintain the Baseball Stadium in good condition and Repair, subject to ordinary wear and tear, at its sole expense (subject to Section 10(b) relating to Landlord's contribution to the Capital Reserve), t he standard of maintenance to which Tenant will adhere in the maintenance of stadiums, such as, on the date hereof, Kansas City and Dodger stadiums, taking Into account the age and design of such stadiums; provided, however, that Tenant will not be required to upgrade equipment and systems (such as scoreboard, public address system, telecommunication facilities ) in order to remain state of the art with other stadiums, but all such equipment and systems shall be maintained at least to the standard of the Benchmark described below.”

20 “Tenant will operate the Baseball Stadium in a manner which Is consistent with first class professional baseball stadium operating practices used in Major League Baseball, such as. on the date hereof, Kansas City and Dodger stadiums (the "Benchmark Standard"); provided, however, that in the case of evaluating the physical condition of the Baseball Stadium, the Benchmark Standard shall take into account the age of the Baseball Stadium. For the purpose of determining compliance by Landlord with this Section 22(a), reference shall be made solely to the Benchmark Standard.”

A copy of the May 15, 1996 Lease Agreement between the City of Anaheim and Angles Baseball, LP may be view on the City website at:
https://www.anaheim.net/DocumentCenter/View/38434/1996-Angel-Stadium-lease-with- exhibits- or by searching the following in your URL search bar: 1996-Angel-Stadium- Lease-with-exhibits-.
21 APPENDIX 2

SAMPLE AGREEMENT

A G R E E M E N T
THIS AGREEMENT, dated for purposes of identification only this _____ day of __________, 2023, is made and entered into by and between the

CITY OF ANAHEIM, a municipal corporation,
hereinafter referred to as "ANAHEIM,"
A
N
D

______________________, a __________________,
hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT."

ANAHEIM and CONSULTANT are sometimes individually referred to herein as "Party" and collectively as "Parties."
W I T N E S S E T H:

WHEREAS, ANAHEIM is a municipal corporation duly organized and validly existing under the laws of the State of California with the power to carry on its business as it is now being conducted under the statutes of the State of California and the Charter of the City of Anaheim; and
WHEREAS, ANAHEIM desires to obtain the services of CONSULTANT to provide a review and assessment of the current and future capital needs of Angel Stadium of Anaheim and to obtain a capital repair, replacement and improvement program (the "Project"); and
WHEREAS, CONSULTANT possesses the skill, experience, ability, background, certification and knowledge to provide the services for the Project as described in this Agreement; and WHEREAS, ANAHEIM has solicited and received a proposal from CONSULTANT, has reviewed the previous experience and evaluated the expertise of CONSULTANT, and desires to retain CONSULTANT to render professional services under the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL PROMISES, COVENANTS AND CONDITIONS HEREIN CONTAINED, THE PARTIES HERETO AGREE AS FOLLOWS:

1. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY CONSULTANT
In compliance with all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall provide to ANAHEIM all labor, materials, tools, equipment, services, and incidental and customary work necessary to fully and adequately supply the professional consulting services necessary for the Project ("Services") and are more particularly described in CONSULTANT’s Proposal dated __________________, attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference ("Scope of Services").

In the event of conflicting provisions, the provisions shall govern in the following order: (1) this Agreement and (2) the Proposal. ANAHEIM may elect to delete certain tasks from the Scope of Services in its sole discretion.

2. TERM
The term of this Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date of this Agreement as set forth in Section 38 herein, and shall terminate upon the completion of the Servi ces described herein, unless terminated earlier as set forth in Section 25 herein ("Term").

3. TIME OF PERFORMANCE

3.1 Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement and the Services shall be performed to completion in a diligent and timely manner. The failure by CONSULTANT to perform the Services in a diligent and timely manner may result in termination of this Agreement by ANAHEIM. 22 3.2 The time period(s) specified for performance of the Services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be extended because of any delays due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of CONSULTANT, including, but not restricted to, acts of God or of the public enemy, unusually severe weather, fires, earthquakes, floods, pestilence, and other natural catastrophes, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes, freight embargoes, wars, litigation, civil disturbance or disobedience, sabotage, restraint by court order or public authority and action or non- action by or inability to obtain the necessary authorization or approvals from any governmental agency or authority, and/or acts of any governmental agency, including A NAHEIM, which by the exercise of due diligence such Party could not reasonably have been expected to avoid and which by exercise of due diligence has been unable to overcome, if CONSULTANT shall within ten (10) days of the commencement of such delay notify the Project Administrator in writing of the causes of the delay. The Project Administrator shall ascertain the facts and the extent of delay, and may extend the time for performing the Services for the period of the enforced delay if, in the judgment of the Project Administrator, such delay is justified. The Project Administrator's determination shall be final and conclusive upon the Parties to this Agreement. In the event of delay, however caused, CONSULTANT's sole remedy shall be an extension of this Agreement pursuant to this Section and CONSULTANT shall not be entitled to recover damages against ANAHEIM.

4. COMPENSATION

4.1 ANAHEIM shall pay CONSULTANT for the Services render ed, pursuant to this Agreement, in the amount of _________________________pursuant to the fee proposal set forth in Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference (“Schedule of Compensation").

CONSULTANT and ANAHEIM agree that no changes to the fee proposal set forth in Exhibit A shall be made during the term of this Agreement without the prior written approval of ANAHEIM.

4.2 No Extra Services shall be rendered by CONSULTANT, unless such Extra Work is first approved by written amendment to this Ag reement. As used herein, “Extra Work” means any work that is determined by ANAHEIM to be necessary for the proper completion of the Services, but which is not included within the Scope of Services and which the Parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement. Compensation for any authorized Extra Work billed on a time and expense basis shall be paid in accordance with billing rates set forth in the Schedule of Compensation.

4.3. CONSULTANT shall submit mo nthly invoices to ANAHEIM describing the work performed the preceding month. CONSULTANT’s bills shall include the name of the person who performed the work, a brief description of the Services performed and/or the specific task in the Scope of Services to which it relates, the date the Services were performed, the number of hours spent on all work billed on an hourly basis, and a description of any reimbursable expenditures. ANAHEIM shall pay CONSULTANT no later than thirty (30) days after approval of the monthly invoice by ANAHEIM staff.

4.4 All Parties recognize that the continuation of this Agreement after the close of any fiscal year of ANAHEIM, which fiscal year ends on June 30 of each year, shall be subject to budget approval providing for or covering such contract items as an expenditure in said budget.

5. PROJECT MANAGER

5.1 CONSULTANT shall designate a Project Manager, who shall coordinate the Services. This Project Manager shall be available to ANAHEIM at all reasonable times during the Term of this Agreement. CONSULTANT has designated _________________ to be its Project Manager. It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, 23 capability and reputation of the foregoing Project Manager is a substantial inducement for ANAHEIM to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the foregoi ng Project Manager shall be responsible during the Term of this Agreement for directing all activities of CONSULTANT and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the provision of Services hereunder. The foregoing Project Manager may not be changed by CONSULTANT and no other personnel may be assigned to supervise the Services to be provided hereunder without the express written consent of ANAHEIM.

5.2 Any personnel or subconsultant, if any, who fail or refuse to perform the Services in a manner acceptable to ANAHEIM, or who are determined by ANAHEIM, in its sole discretion, to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Project, or a threat to the safety of persons or property, shall be promptly removed from th e Project by CONSULTANT at the request of ANAHEIM. CONSULTANT warrants that it will continuously furnish the necessary personnel to complete the Services on a timely basis as contemplated by this Agreement.

6. ADMINISTRATION
This Agreement will be administered by the City’s Attorney Office. The employees of the City Attorney’s Office shall be authorized to take the following actions pursuant to this Agreement:
(i) The City Attorney or designee is authorized to take any and all actions on behalf of ANAHEIM as set forth herein, including review and approval of all Services performed by CONSULTANT under this Agreement and to terminate services in accordance with Section 25 of this Agreement.

7. STANDARD OF CARE

7.1 CONSULTANT shall perform all Services under this Agreement in a skillful and competent manner, consistent with the standards generally recognized as being employed by professionals in the same discipline in the State of California. CONSULTANT represents and maintains that it is skilled in the professional calling necessary to perform the Services. CONSULTANT warrants that all employees and subconsultants, if any, shall have sufficient skill and experience to perform the Services assigned to them. By deli very of completed work, CONSULTANT certifies that the work conforms to the requirements of this Agreement; all applicable federal, state and local laws; and the professional standard of care.

8. FAMILIARITY WITH WORK
By executing this Agreement, CONSULTANT represents and warrants that CONSULTANT: (i) has thoroughly investigated and considered the Services to be performed; (ii) has carefully considered how the Services should be provided; and (iii) fully understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending the provision of the Services under this Agreement. Should CONSULTANT discove r any latent or unknown conditions materially differing from those inherent in the provision of such Services or as represented by ANAHEIM, CONSULTANT shall immediately inform ANAHEIM of such fact and shall not proceed except at CONSULTANT's risk until written instructions are received from ANAHEIM.

9. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR

9.1 Neither ANAHEIM nor any of its employees shall have any control over the manner, mode or means by which CONSULTANT, its agents or employees, perform the services required herein, except as otherwise set forth herein. Except as expressly provided herein, ANAHEIM shall have no voice in the selection, discharge, supervision or control of CONSULTANT's employees, servants, representatives or agents, or in fixing their number, compensation or hours of service. CONSULTANT shall perform all services required herein as an independent contractor of ANAHEIM and shall remain at all times as to ANAHEIM a wholly independent contractor with only such obligations as are consistent with that role. C ONSULTANT shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its agents or employees are agents or employees of ANAHEIM. ANAHEIM shall not in any way or for any purpose become or be deemed to be a partner of CONSULTANT in its business or ot herwise or a joint venture or a member of any joint enterprise with CONSULTANT.

9.2 In consideration for the compensation paid to CONSULTANT by ANAHEIM, CONSULTANT agrees that ANAHEIM shall not be liable or responsible for any benefits, including, but not limited to, worker's compensation, disability, retirement, life, unemployment, health or any other benefits and CONSULTANT agrees that it shall not sue or file a claim, petition or application therefore against ANAHEIM or any of its officers, employees, ag ents, representatives or sureties.
24 10. INSURANCE

10.1 Without limiting ANAHEIM’S right to indemnification, it is agreed that CONSULTANT shall secure, prior to commencing any activities under this Agreement, and maintain, during the term of this Agreement, insurance coverage as follows:
.01 Workers' Compensation Insurance as required by California law and Employers Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence/accident/illness/injury. .02 Commercial General Liability Insurance, including coverage for Premises and Operations, Contractual Liability, Personal Injury Liability, Products/Completed Operations Liability, as well as Independent CONSULTANT’S Liability where appropriate, in an amount not less than $2,000,000 per occurrenc e, $4,000,000 annual aggregate, written on an occurrence form. Such insurance shall be written on a primary basis but may include a deductible or self-insured retention of more than $10,000 per occurrence, provided that such deductible or self-insured retention is disclosed to ANAHEIM, in writing, at the inception of this Agreement. .03 Commercial Automobile Liability Coverage including —as applicable—owned, non-owned, and hired autos, in an amount not less than $2,000,000 per occurrence, combined single limit, as required by California law.
.04 Professional Liability Insurance, inclusive of Cyber Liability Insurance, in an amount not less than $2,000,000 per occurrence or per claim. Such insurance shall be written on a primary basis, but may include a deductible or self-insured retention of more than $10,000 per occurrence, provided that such deductible or self-insured retention is disclosed to ANAHEIM, in writing, at the inception of this Agreement.

10.2 Any required coverage writ ten with primary and excess layers to satisfy the minimum requirements of this Agreement must be submitted for approval by ANAHEIM’s Risk Manager prior to the inception of the final Agreement.

CONSULTANT agrees that this insurance shall not be voluntarily cancelled by CONSULTANT, or limited in scope or coverage by CONSULTANT, until after thirty (30) days prior written notice has been given to the City Clerk, City of Anaheim, 200 S. Anaheim Blvd., Anaheim, CA 92805. This does not apply to ca ncellation for non- payment of premium, which requires notice of not less than ten (10) days.

10.3 Each insurance policy required by this Agreement, excepting policies for Professional Liability and Workers' Compensation, shall contain the following clauses or shall otherwise provide for the following conditions:
.01 "It is agreed that any insurance maintained by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement shall be primary to, and not contribute with, any insurance or self -insurance maintained by the City of Anaheim."
.02 "The City of Anaheim, its officers, agents, employees, representatives and ANAHEIM-designated volunteers are added as additional insureds as respects the acts, omissions, operations and activities of, or on behalf of, the named insured, in rega rd to products supplied to, or work or services performed for, or related to, the City of Anaheim."

10.4 Prior to commencing any work under this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall deliver to ANAHEIM insurance certificates confirming the existence of the insurance required under this Agreement, and including the applicable clauses referenced above. Also, within thirty (30) days of the execution date of this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall provide ANAHEIM (i) endorsements to the insurance policies that add to these policies the applicable clauses referenced above, or (ii) in lieu of said endorsements, documentation acceptable to ANAHEIM evidencing that the coverage, terms, and conditions set forth in the above -referenced clauses are otherwise included in said insurance policies. Insurance required hereunder shall be placed with insurers (i) admitted to write insurance in California, (ii) possessing an A. M. Best’s rating of A VII or higher, or (iii) otherwise acceptable to ANAHEIM, with prior written permission from ANAHEIM. In the event that a claim or other legal action is filed against ANAHEIM, and if ANAHEIM, in its good faith opinion, believes it may have coverage under any of the insurance required herein, then ANAHEIM has the right to demand, and to receive within a reasonable time period, copies of the insurance policies related to such required insurance; provided, however, that this provision shall not apply if the parties agree that CONSULTANT shall fully defend, hold harmless, and ind emnify ANAHEIM against any such claim or other legal action.

10.5 In addition to other remedies ANAHEIM may have if CONSULTANT fails to provide or maintain any insurance policies or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, ANA HEIM may, at its sole option:
25 .01 Order CONSULTANT to stop work under this Agreement and/or withhold any payment(s) which become due to CONSULTANT hereunder until CONSULTANT demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof; or
.02 Terminate this Agreement.

Exercise of any of the above remedies, however, is an alternative to other remedies ANAHEIM may have and is not the exclusive remedy for CONSULTANT's failure to maintain insurance or secure appropriate endorsements.

10.7 In the event CONSULTANT hires other persons or firms to perform some of the work related to this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall ensure (i) that the acts or omissions of such persons or firms are covered under the above-referenced liability insurance, or (ii) that such firms maintain insurance equal to or better than, and subject to the same limits, terms and conditions as, the insurance required of CONSULTANT under this Agreement (except for firms that are not performing profession al services—such firms shall not be required to carry the above -referenced professional liability insurance); and in either instance, CONSULTANT shall provide, or cause to be provided, evidence of such insurance coverage, reasonably acceptable to ANAHEIM.

10.8 ANAHEIM’S Risk Manager is hereby authorized to amend the requirements set forth herein in the event that such reduction is in ANAHEIM’S best interest.

11. INDEMNIFICATION

11.1 As respects acts, errors or omissions in the performance of professional services, CONSULTANT agrees to indemnify and hold harmless ANAHEIM, its officials, officers, and employees from and against any and all claims, losses, damages, defense costs, or liability, of any kind or nature, directly arising out of the negligent acts, e rrors or omissions of the CONSULTANT or any SUB -AGENT in the performance of professional services under this Agreement.

11.2 As respects all acts, errors or omissions that do not arise directly out of the performance of professional services, including but not limited to those acts, errors or omissions typically covered by general and automobile liability insurance, CONSULTANT agrees to indemnify, defend (at ANAHEIM'S option), and hold harmless ANAHEIM, its officials, officers, emp loyees, agents, and representatives from and against any and all claims, losses, damages, defense costs, or liability, of any kind or nature (collectively referred to hereinafter as “Claims”), arising out of or in connection with CONSULTANT’S (or CONSULTANT'S AGENT or SUB-AGENT, if any) acts, errors, omissions, or work, relative to this Agreement; except for those Claims that arise out of the sole negligence or willful misconduct of ANAHEIM.

11.3 The obligations set forth in this indemnification provis ion (i) shall be in effect without regard to whether or not ANAHEIM, CONSULTANT, or any other person maintains, or fails to maintain, insurance coverage, or a self - insurance program, for any such Claims; and (ii) shall survive the termination of this Agree ment.

12. PREVAILING WAGES
Where required pursuant to the provisions of the State of California Labor Code or the Davis Bacon Act, not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages including legal holidays, and overtime work for each craft or t ype of workman needed to execute the work contemplated under this Agreement, shall be paid to all workmen employed on the work to be done according to this contract by CONSULTANT or any approved Subcontractor, and shall be deemed to include employer payments for health and welfare, pension, vacation and similar purposes. If both the Davis-Bacon Act and State of California prevailing wage laws apply and the federal and state prevailing rate of per diem wages differ, CONSULTANT and Subcontractor, if any, shall pay the higher of the two rates. Said prevailing rate of per diem wages are on file at the City of Anaheim, Office of the City Clerk, 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California 92805, and are available to any interested party on request.

13. PROGRESS
CONSULTANT is responsible for keeping the Project Administrator and/or his/her duly authorized designee informed on a regular basis regarding the status and progress of the Services, activities performed and planned, and any meetings that have been scheduled or are desired.

14. PROHIBITION AGAINST ASSIGNMENTS AND TRANSFERS
26 The Parties recognize that a substantial inducement to ANAHEIM for entering into this Agreement is the professional reputation, experience and competence of CONSULTANT. Neither the whole nor any interest in, nor any of the rights or privileges granted under this Agreement shall be assigned, transferred or encumbered in any way without the prior written consent of ANAHEIM. Any such purported assignment, transfer, encumbrance, pledge, subuse, or permission given without such consent shall be void as to ANAHEIM. If ANAHEIM approves an assignment or transfer, this Agreement and the covenants and conditions contained herein shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of and shall apply to the permitted successors and assigns of CONSULTANT.

15. SUBCONTRACTING
Except for those subcontractors set forth in the Scope of Services, if any, CONSULTANT shall not subcontract any portion of the work to be performed under this Agreement without th e prior written authorization of ANAHEIM.

CONSULTANT shall be fully responsible to ANAHEIM for all acts and omissions of any approved subcontractor.

Nothing in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between ANAHEIM and subcontractor nor shall it create any obligation on the part of ANAHEIM to pay or to see to the payment of any monies due to any such subcontractor other than as otherwise required by law. ANAHEIM is an intended beneficiary of any work performed by any subcontractor for purposes of establishing a duty of care between the subcontractor and ANAHEIM pursuant to this Agreement.

16. USE AND OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS AND DATA

16.1 ANAHEIM shall furnish to CONSULTANT such documents and materials as may be relevant and pertinent to the provision of services hereunder as ANAHEIM may possess or acquire.

16.2 All documents and materials furnished by ANAHEIM to CONSULTANT pursuant to Section 16.1 shall remain the property of ANAHEIM and shall be returned to ANAHEIM upon termination of this Agreement, for any reason. All documents or material prepared or caused to be prepared by CONSULTANT, its officers, employees, agents and subcontractors, in the course of implementing this Agreement, shall become the exclusive property of ANAHEIM, an d ANAHEIM shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion without further compensation to CONSULTANT or any other party. CONSULTANT shall, at CONSULTANT's sole cost and expense, provide such documents and material to ANAHEIM upon prior written request.

Documents and material prepared by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement are not intended or represented to be suitable for reuse by ANAHEIM or others on any other project. Any use of completed documents for other projects and any use of incomplete docume nts without specific written authorization from CONSULTANT will be at ANAHEIM's sole risk and without liability to CONSULTANT. Further, any and all liability arising out of changes made to CONSULTANT's deliverables under this Agreement by ANAHEIM or perso ns other than CONSULTANT, is waived against CONSULTANT and ANAHEIM assumes full responsibility for such changes unless ANAHEIM has given CONSULTANT prior notice and has received from CONSULTANT written consent for such changes.

17. CONFIDENTIALITY
All documents, including drafts, preliminary drawings or plans, notes, ideas and communications that result from the Services provided under this Agreement, shall be kept confidential by CONSULTANT and are subject to the attorney- client privilege and/or may be a ttorney work product, unless ANAHEIM authorizes, in writing, the release of said information.

18. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INDEMNITY
CONSULTANT shall defend and indemnify ANAHEIM, its agents, officers, representatives and employees against any and all liability, including costs, for infringement of any United States' letters patent, trademark, or copyright infringement, including costs, contained in the work product or documents provided by CONSULTANT to ANAHEIM pursuant to this Agreement.

19. RECORDS
CONSULTANT shall keep records and invoices in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement.

CONSULTANT shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to the costs incurred under this Agreement and any services, expenditures and disbursements charged to ANAHEIM, for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to CONSULTANT under this Agreement. All such records and invoices shall be clearly identifiable. CONSULTANT shall allow a representative of ANAHEIM to examine, audit and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement during regular business hours. CONSULTANT shall allow inspection of all work, data, Documents , proceedings and activities related to this Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment to CONSULTANT under this Agreement.

20. WITHHOLDINGS
27 ANAHEIM may withhold payment to CONSULTANT of any disputed sums until satisfaction of the dispute with respect to such payment. Such withholding shall not be deemed to constitute a failure to pay according to the terms of this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall not discontinue work as a result of such withholding. CONSULTANT shall have an immediate right to appeal to the City Manager or his Designee with respect to such disputed sums and his/her decision shall be final. CONSULTANT shall be entitled to receive interest on any withheld sums at the rate of return that ANAHEIM earned on its investments during the time period, from the date of withholding of any amounts found to have been improperly withheld.

21. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS
In the event of errors or omissions that are due to the negligence or professional inexperience of CONSULTANT which result in expense to ANAHEIM greater than what would have resulted if there were not errors or omissions in the work accomplished by CONSULTANT, the additional cost and expense shall be borne by CONSULTANT.

Nothing in this paragraph is intended to limit ANAH EIM's rights under the law or any other sections of this Agreement.

22. ANAHEIM'S RIGHT TO EMPLOY OTHER CONSULTANTS
CONSULTANT acknowledges and agrees that this Agreement and the provision of services hereunder are nonexclusive and that ANAHEIM may enter into similar agreements with other entities for the provision of similar services.

23. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
CONSULTANT or its employees may be subject to the provisions of the California Political Reform Act of 1974 (the "Act"), which: (1) requires such persons to disclose any financial interest that may foreseeably be materially affected by the work performed under this Agreement; and (2) prohibits such persons from making, or participating in making, decisions that will foreseeably financially affect such interest.

If subject to the Act, CONSULTANT shall conform to all requirements of the Act.

Failure to do so constitutes a material breach and is grounds for immediate termination of this Agreement by ANAHEIM. CONSULTANT shall indemnify and hold harmle ss ANAHEIM for any and all claims for damages resulting from CONSULTANT’s violation of this Section.

24. NOTICES
All notices, demands or other writings to be made, given or sent hereunder, or which may be so given or made or sent by either ANAHEIM or CON SULTANT to the other shall be deemed to have been given when in writing and personally delivered or if mailed on the third (3rd) day after being deposited in the United States mail, certified or registered, postage prepaid, and addressed to the respective Parties at the following addresses:

If to ANAHEIM: City Clerk
City of Anaheim
200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, 2nd Floor
Anaheim, California 92805
FAX No. (714) 765-4105

With copies to: Office of the City Attorney
City of Anaheim
200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, 3rd Floor
Anaheim, California 92805
FAX No. (714) 765-5123

To CONSULTANT: Company Name:

Address:

Phone:

28 25. ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT

25.1 Events of Default.
.01 For purposes of this Section 25, the word "Default" shall mean the failure of CONSULTANT to perform any of CONSULTANT's duties or obligations or the breach by CONSULTANT of any of the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. In addition, CONSULTANT shall be deemed to be in Default upon CONSULTANT's (i) application for, con sent to, or suffering of, the appointment of a receiver, trustee or liquidator for all or a substantial portion of its assets; (ii) making a general assignment for the benefit of creditors; (iii) being adjudged bankrupt; (iv) filing a voluntary petition or suffering an involuntary petition under any bankruptcy, arrangement, reorganization or insolvency law (unless in the case of an involuntary petition, the same is dismissed within thirty (30) days of such filing); or (v) suffering or permitting to continue unstayed and in effect for fifteen (15) consecutive days any attachment, levy, execution or seizure of all or a substantial portion of CONSULTANT's assets or of CONSULTANT's interests hereunder.
.02 ANAHEIM shall not be deemed to be in Default in the perf ormance of any obligation required to be performed by ANAHEIM hereunder unless and until ANAHEIM has failed to perform such obligation for a period of thirty (30) days after receipt of written notice from CONSULTANT specifying in reasonable detail the natu re and extent of any such failure; provided, however, that if the nature of ANAHEIM's obligation is such that more than thirty (30) days are required for its performance, then ANAHEIM shall not be deemed to be in Default if ANAHEIM shall commence to cure s uch performance within such thirty (30) day period and thereafter diligently prosecute the same to completion.

25.2 Immediate Termination for CONSULTANT's Default. CONSULTANT shall not be deemed to be in Default in the performance of any obligation required to be performed by CONSULTANT hereunder unless and until CONSULTANT has failed to perform such obligation for a period of thirty (30) days after receipt of written notice from ANAHEIM specifying in reasonable detail the nature and extent of any such fai lure; provided, however, that if the nature of CONSULTANT's obligation is such that more than thirty (30) days are required for its performance, then CONSULTANT shall not be deemed to be in Default if CONSULTANT shall commence to cure such performance within such thirty (30) day period and thereafter diligently prosecute the same to completion.

25.3 Termination without Cause. ANAHEIM may terminate this Agreement at any time without the necessity of cause or Default by giving thirty (30) days' notice in wri ting to CONSULTANT. In such event, the Parties shall have no further rights hereunder, except that CONSULTANT shall be paid for all services adequately rendered prior to such termination and shall receive payment in full for equipment and equipment that has been ordered that cannot be canceled. CONSULTANT may not terminate this Agreement except for cause.

26. COMPLIANCE WITH ALL LAWS
CONSULTANT shall at its own cost and expense comply with all statutes, ordinances, regulations and requirements of all governmental entities, including federal, state, county or municipal, whether now in force or hereinafter enacted.

In addition, all work prepared by CONSULTANT shall conform to applicable local, county, state and federal laws, rules, regulations and permit requirements and be subject to approval of the Project Administrator.

27. WAIVER
A waiver by either Party of any breach, of any term, covenant or condition contained herein shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other term, covenant or condition contained herein, whether of the same or a different character.

28. INTEGRATED CONTRACT
This Agreement and the exhibits hereto contain the entire agreement of ANAHEIM and CONSULTANT with respect to the matters covered hereby, and no agreement, statement or promise made by either ANAHEIM or CONSULTANT which is not contained herein, shall be valid or binding. No prior agreement, understanding or representation pertaining to any such matter shall be effective for any purpose.

29. CONFLICTS OR INCONSISTENCIES
In the event there are any conflicts or inconsistencies between this Agreement and the Exhibits or any other attachments attached hereto, the terms of this Agreement shall govern.

30. INTERPRETATION
29 Each Party acknowledges that he / she / it has had the benefit of advice of competent legal counsel with respect to its decision to enter this Agreement. The provisions of this Agreement shall be interpreted to give effect to their fair meaning and shall be construed as prepared by both Parties.

31. AMENDMENTS
This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written document executed by both CONSULTANT and ANAHEIM and approved as to form by the City Attorney.

32. SEVERABILITY
If any term or provision of this Agreement or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall, to any extent, be held invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement, or the application of its terms and provisions to persons and circumstances other than those to which it has been held in valid or unenforceable shall not be affected thereby, and each term and provision of this Agreement shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law.

33. REMEDIES CUMULATIVE
The remedies given to ANAHEIM and CONSULTANT herein shall be cumulative and are given without impairing any other rights given ANAHEIM or CONSULTANT by statute or law now existing or hereafter enacted and the exercise on any one (1) remedy by ANAHEIM or CONSULTANT shall not exclude the exercise of any other remedy.

34. NO THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES
The Parties intend that no rights nor remedies be granted to any third party as a beneficiary of this Agreement or of any covenant, duty, obligation or undertaking established herein.

35. CONTROLLING LAW AND VENUE
The laws of the State of California shall govern this Agreement and all matters relating to it and any action brought relating to this Agreement shall be adjudicated in a court of competent jurisdiction in the County of Orange.

36. DISCRIMINATION
CONSULTANT agrees not to discriminate against any person or class of persons by reason of sex, color, race, creed, religion, marital status, handicap, ancestry, national origin or other prohibited basis in its provision of Services or hiring of subcontractors or employees . To the extent this Agreement provides that CONSULTANT offer accommodations or services to the public, such accommodations or services shall be offered by CONSULTANT to the public on fair and reasonable terms.

37. AUTHORITY
Each individual executing this Agreement on behalf of a corporation, nonprofit corporation, partnership or other entity or organization, represents and warrants the he or she is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of such entity or organization and that this Agreement is binding upon the same in accordance with its terms.

CONSULTANT shall, at ANAHEIM's request, deliver a certified copy of it governing board's resolution or certificate authorizing or evidencing such execution.

38. EFFECTIVE DATE
This Agreement shall be effective on the date on which this Agreement is executed by ANAHEIM ("Effective Date"). [Remainder of page intentionally left blank; signatures on next page]

30 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed on the dates hereinafter respectively set forth.

DATE OF EXECUTION:

CITY OF ANAHEIM
a municipal corporation

By:

“ANAHEIM”
ATTEST:

By: _
City Clerk of Anaheim

DATE OF EXECUTION:

By: _____________________________________

Printed Name: _____________________________

Title: ___________________________________

“CONSULTANT”

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

ROBERT FABELA, CITY ATTORNEY

By:

Bryn M. Morley
Deputy City Attorney

Dated:
147941
Attachments: Exhibit A

31 EXHIBIT A
(SAMPLE AGREEMENT)

SCOPE OF SERVICES

(Attached behind this page)

32 APPENDIX 3

INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS

INSURANCE

Without limiting ANAHEIM’S right to indemnification, it is agreed that CONSULTANT shall secure, prior to commencing any activities under this Agreement, and maintain, during the term of this Agreement, insurance coverage as follows:

Workers’ Compensation Insurance as required by California law and Employers Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence/accident/illness/injury.

Commercial General Liability Insurance, including coverage for Premises and Operations, Contractual Liability, Personal Injury Liability, Products/Completed Operations Liability, as well as Independent CONSULTANT’S Liability where appropriate, in an amount not less than $2,000,000 per occurrence, $4,000,000 annual aggregate, written on an occurrence form. Such insurance shall be written on a primary basis but may include a deductible or self-insured retention of more than $10,000 per occurrence, provided that such deductible or self-insured retention is disclosed to ANAHEIM, in writing, at the inception of this Agreement.

Commercial Automobile Liability Coverage including—as applicable—owned, non- owned, and hired autos, in an amount not less than $2,000,000 per occurrence, combined single limit, as required by California law.

Professional Liability Insurance, inclusive of Cyber Liability Insurance, in an amount not less than $2,000,000 per occurrence or per claim. Such insurance shall be written on a primary basis, but may include a deductible or self-insured retention of more than $10,000 per occurrence, provided that such deductible or self- insured retention is disclosed to ANAHEIM, in writing, at the inception of this Agreement.

Any required coverage written with primary and excess layers to satisfy the minimum requirements of this Agreement must be submitted for approval by ANAHEIM’s Risk Manager prior to the inception of the final Agreement.

CONSULTANT agrees that this insurance shall not be voluntarily cancelled by CONSULTANT, or limited in scope or coverage by CONSULTANT, until after thirty (30) days prior written notice has been given to the City Clerk, City of Anaheim, 200 S. Anaheim Blvd., Anaheim, CA 92805. This does not apply to cancellation for non- payment of premium, which requires notice of not less than ten (10) days.

Each insurance policy required by this Agreement shall contain the following clause or shall otherwise provide for the following conditions:

Each insurance policy required by this Agreement, except policies for Professional Liability and Workers’ Compensation, shall contain the following clauses or shall otherwise provide for the following conditions:

33 “It is agreed that any insurance maintained by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement shall be primary to, and not contribute with, any insurance or self- insurance maintained by the City of Anaheim.”

“The City of Anaheim, its officers, agents, employees, representatives and ANAHEIM- designated volunteers are added as additional insured as respects the acts, omissions, operations and activities of, or on behalf of, the named insured, in regard to products supplied to, or work or services performed for, or related to, the City of Anaheim.”

Prior to commencing any work under this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall deliver to ANAHEIM insurance certificates confirming the existence of the insurance required under this Agreement, and including the applicable clauses referenced above. Also, within thirty (30) days of the execution date of this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall provide ANAHEIM (i) endorsements to the insurance policies that add to these policies the applicable clauses referenced above, or (ii) in lieu of said endorsements, documentation acceptable to ANAHEIM evidencing that the coverage, terms, and conditions set forth in the above-referenced clauses are otherwise included in said insurance policies. Insurance required hereunder shall be placed with insurers (i) admitted to write insurance in California, (ii) possessing an A. M. Best’s rating of A VII or higher, or (iii) otherwise acceptable to ANAHEIM, with prior written permission from ANAHEIM. In the event that a claim or other legal action is filed against ANAHEIM, and if ANAHEIM, in its good faith opinion, believes it may have coverage under any of the insurance required herein, then ANAHEIM has the right to demand, and to receive within a reasonable time period, copies of the insurance policies related to such required insurance; provided, however, that this provision shall not apply if the parties agree that CONSULTANT shall fully defend, hold harmless, and indemnify ANAHEIM against any such claim or other legal action.

In addition to other remedies ANAHEIM may have if CONSULTANT fails to provide or maintain any insurance policies or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, ANAHEIM may, at its sole option:

Order CONSULTANT to stop work under this Agreement and/or withhold any payment(s) that become due to CONSULTANT hereunder until CONSULTANT demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof;

Terminate this Agreement.

Exercise of any of the above remedies, however, is an alternative to other remedies ANAHEIM may have and is not the exclusive remedy for CONSULTANT’S failure to maintain insurance or secure appropriate endorsements.

Nothing herein contained shall be construed in any way as limiting the extent that an CONSULTANT may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from CONSULTANT’S, (or CONSULTANT’S AGENT or SUB-AGENT, if any) performance of the work covered under this Agreement.

In the event CONSULTANT hires other persons or firms to perform some of the work related to this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall ensure (i) that the acts or omissions of such persons or firms are covered under the above-referenced liability insurance, or (ii) 34 that such firms maintain insurance equal to or better than, and subject to the same limits, terms and conditions as, the insurance required of CONSULTANT under this Agreement (except for firms that are not performing professional services—such firms shall not be required to carry the above-referenced professional liability insurance); and in either instance, CONSULTANT shall provide, or cause to be provided, evidence of such insurance coverage, reasonably acceptable to ANAHEIM.

ANAHEIM’S Risk Manager is hereby authorized to amend the requirements set forth herein in the event that such reduction is in ANAHEIM’S best interest.

35 INDEMNIFICATION

As respects acts, errors or omissions in the performance of professional services, CONSULTANT agrees to indemnify and hold harmless ANAHEIM, its officials, officers, and employees from and against any and all claims, losses, damages, defense costs, or liability, of any kind or nature, directly arising out of the negligent acts, errors or omissions of the CONSULTANT or any SUB-AGENT in the performance of professional services under this Agreement.

As respects all acts, errors or omissions that do not arise directly out of the performance of professional services, including but not limited to those acts, errors or omissions typically covered by general and automobile liability insurance, CONSULTANT agrees to indemnify, defend (at ANAHEIM'S option), and hold harmless ANAHEIM, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and representatives from and against any and all claims, losses, damages, defense costs, or liability, of any kind or nature (collectively referred to hereinafter as “Claims”), arising out of or in connection with CONSULTANT’S (or CONSULTANT'S AGENT or SUB-AGENT, if any) acts, errors, omissions, or work, relative to this Agreement; except for those Claims that arise out of the sole negligence or willful misconduct of ANAHEIM.

The obligations set forth in this indemnification provision (i) shall be in effect without regard to whether or not ANAHEIM, CONSULTANT, or any other person maintains, or fails to maintain, insurance coverage, or a self-insurance program, for any such Claims; and (ii) shall survive the termination of this Agreement.

36 APPENDIX 4

CONFLICT OF INTEREST FORM

Conflict of Interest Form for Consultants
(Consultant to complete, sign and submit with the RFP Submittals)

The Political Reform Act (Government Code Sections 81000-91014) and Government Code Section 1090 prohibit any Anaheim public official, officer, or employee from involvement in a governmental decision or contract in which he or she has a financial interest. It is the responsibility of the consultant, consultant's employees, and subconsultants who perform work under the consultant agreement to evaluate any potential conflict of interests and follow the provisions of the conflict of interest requirements as set forth in the consultant agreement. Be advised that a prohibited conflict of interest may void any award where it exists.

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I have reviewed and understand the above paragraph, and in furtherance of the foregoing, I have evaluated and caused my company's employees and subconsultants to evaluate any potential conflict of interests.

Based on this evaluation, I hereby further certify that no such conflict of interests exists.

SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY

_____________________________________ Date: ________________

Print Name: ___________________________

Title: _________________________________

Consultant Name: ___________________
37 APPENDIX 5

FEE PROPOSAL FORM

Angel Stadium of Anaheim
Property Condition Assessment

IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO PROVIDE

PROPERTY CONDITION ASSESSMENT SERVICES OF ANGEL STADIUM OF

ANAHEIM, AS DESCRIBED IN THE APPENDIX A REQUIREMENTS, ALL

COMPANIES RESPONDING TO THIS REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL MUST
COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS PROPOSAL FORM.

COMPANY NAME

ADDRESS

CITY STATE ZIP

TELEPHONE FAX

FINANCIAL PROPOSAL:

$____________________Cost: Please provide a single “all-in” price that will include all fees, travel costs, reproduction costs, etc. for all project team members

All components of the Prospective Consultant’s Proposal Package shall remain valid for a minimum of 120 calendar days after the Proposal submission due date or as mutually agreed upon thereafter.

SUBMITTED BY:

PRINT NAME DATE

SIGNATURE

TITLE

Angel Stadium of
Anaheim Property
Condition Assessment
RFP # 515-ANGEL-STADIUM-OF-ANAHEIM-
PROPERTY-CONDITION-ASSESSMENT-02-15-2023 03.20.23
Exhibit B
37 APPENDIX 5

FEE PROPOSAL FORM
Angel Stadium of Anaheim
Property Condition Assessment

IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO PROVIDE

PROPERTY CONDITION ASSESSMENT SERVICES OF ANGEL STADIUM OF

ANAHEIM, AS DESCRIBED IN THE APPENDIX A REQUIREMENTS, ALL

COMPANIES RESPONDING TO THIS REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL MUST
COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS PROPOSAL FORM.

COMPANY NAME

ADDRESS

CITY STATE ZIP

TELEPHONE FAX
EMAIL
FINANCIAL PROPOSAL:

SUBMITTED BY:

PRINT NAME DATE

SIGNATURE
TITLE
Populous
4800 Main Street, Suite 300
Kansas City MO 64112
[email protected]
816-221-1500 816-221-1578
Earl Santee 03/20/2023
Global Chair
$________$325,000 ____________Cost: Please provide a single “all-in” price that will include all fees, travel costs, reproduction costs, etc. for all project team members All components of the Prospective Consultant’s Proposal Package shall remain valid for a minimum of 120 calendar days after the Proposal submission due date or as mutually agreed upon thereafter.

Angel Stadium of Anaheim Property Condition Assessment 3.20.2023 2 36
APPENDIX 4

CONFLICT OF INTEREST FORM
Conflict of Interest Form for Consultants
(Consultant to complete, sign and submit with the RFP Submittals) The Political Reform Act (Government Code Sections 81000-91014) and Government Code Section 1090 prohibit any Anaheim public official, officer, or employee from involvement in a governmental decision or contract in which he or she has a financial interest. It is the responsibility of the consultant, consultant's employees, and subconsultants who perform work under the consultant agreement to evaluate any potential conflict of interests and follow the provisions of the conflict of interest requirements as set forth in the consultant agreement. Be advised that a prohibited conflict of interest may void any award where it exists.

Based on this evaluation, I hereby further certify that no such conflict of interests exists.

SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY
_____________________________________ Date: ________________ Print Name: ___________________________
Title: _________________________________
Consultant Name: ___________________
03/20/2023
Pat Tangen
Principal-in-Charge
Populous
3 01

STATEMENT OF

QUALIFICATIONS
Angel Stadium of Anaheim Property Condition Assessment 3.20.2023 4 March 20, 2023
Dear Tom Morten and the selection committee,
Thank you for the opportunity to submit our qualifications to help you establish a base line condition of Angel Stadium. We appreciate the City of Anaheim's commitment to maintaining a first-class ballpark and first class MLB experience for Angels fans.

Commitment means a lot to us, and in the attached proposal we will show you why the Populous team remains committed to delivering you a facility assessment and related capital outlay for low, medium, and high priority repairs and the 10 & 20 year capital planning needs.

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANNING CAN MAKE OR
BREAK YOUR BALLPARK – Whether it’s a stadium, ballpark
or other venue, the moment you cut the ribbon and open its doors is the moment its maintenance lifecycle begins. This is the less glamorous side of drawing people together. Wear and tear happens. Parts reach the end of their normal lifespans. To fans, these buildings seem static, but behind the scenes are thousands of systems and components that make operating a ballpark more like owning a house. A house that welcomes millions of guests a year.

That’s why a big part of Populous’ expertise lies in the way a facility works. Capital Improvement Planning is the best tool we know of for staying on top of this full-time job. We have completed more than 20 MLB ballpark master plans and numerous Capital Improvement Plans, including for Busch Stadium for the St. Louis Cardinals and most recently for T-Mobile Park and the Mariners.

TRUSTED ADVISORS WHO WILL DELIVER – Our proposed
team members are 90% the original consultant team from the 1994 Angel Stadium Renovation, which at that time, was the largest sports facility renovation in the country. Not only are they the same consulting firms, but they are by and large, the same key staff from the ’94 renovation team. Angel Stadium renovation was an important project of its time and many of our proposed project team members remained with their design and engineering firms over the years and will participate in this facility assessment so that the City of Anaheim has the best, most knowledgeable team for Angel Stadium. No other competing firm can claim this. In addition, many of this same team have performed a number of MLB ballpark facility assessments with Populous in the lead. Such MLB facility assessments include Mariners and T-Mobile Park, Cardinals Busch Stadium, Padres Petco Park, Giants Oracle Park, Pirates PNC Park and others.

You can be assured that the facility assessment will be performed and reviewed by experts, right down to the nuts and bolts. They are thought leaders and thus understand the right questions to ask and the key revenue and operational drivers, with a focus on future trends. We have fun and enjoy long-term relationships with our clients as evidenced by the unmatched number of our repeat clients. We encourage you to contact them.

LOCAL PRESENCE – Populous is currently designing ocV!BE and will continue to have staff in our Los Angeles office who will lead our project team. LA is an important market for Populous and this effort for the City of Anaheim only solidifies this position.

PERSONAL COMMITMENT – Our key staff are long-time
employees devoted to creating places where people love to be together. We will be with you from start to finish. Our selected staff have worked together on multiple projects and in addition, our consultant team members have strong working relationships with each other. Our team members have successfully completed numerous facility assessment initiatives within a similar timeframe, an important distinction since these previous efforts involved a similar degree of existing condition assessment, informed analysis and creative problem solving. We have the depth of resources necessary to execute any targeted master plan and capital improvements planning.

Thank you for your time and we look forward to further discussing this opportunity with you.

Sincerely,

PAT TANGEN
Populous, Inc. (Corporation)
4800 Main Street, Suite 300
Kansas City, MO 64112
Principal-in-Charge
E: [email protected]
T: +1 816 221 1500

ERIC RANDOLPH
Populous, Inc. (Corporation)
4800 Main Street, Suite 300
Kansas City, MO 64112
Project Manager/Main Point of Contact
E: [email protected]
T: +1 816 221 1500

5 AGREEMENT STATEMENT
Populous has participated in multiple projects where
the Sample Agreement included with the RFP was the
basis of the contract discussions. On each occasion,
we have been able to come to terms. We are confident
that any issues with the Sample Agreement can be
amicably resolved in a short period of time.

Populous acknowledges receipt of Addendum #1 that
was issued on March 10, 2023.

Angel Stadium of Anaheim Property Condition Assessment 3.20.20236

PETCO PARK
San Diego, California
7 A GLOBAL DESIGN FIRM
We design the places
where people love to
be together.

Innovation is the cornerstone of how we draw people together and create a better-built tomorrow.

In the world’s top cities we have designed more than 3,500 hospitality, entertainment and sports projects worth over $40 billion combined. Our designs for places like Yankee Stadium in New York, Truist Park in Atlanta and Wrigley Field in Chicago have created emotional connections between people and the civic sports and entertainment places and events they love. The top communities entrust Populous to help build their brands through design.

Our unrivaled knowledge — both visionary and technical — is unveiled through comprehensive planning and design services with experiential design at the core.

Our focus includes not just the individual buildings that define a community, such as sports architecture, conference and exhibition center architecture or aviation design, but also the urban fabric that weaves these buildings together. We have been recognized more than 200 times with global design awards, including three national American Institute of Architects awards. We have been listed six times as one of Fast Company Magazine’s most innovative companies.

Every community has a story to tell — it is our mission to give life to those stories through design. We are the people who create the places where communities unite.

Most
Innovative
Company
Sports |
Architecture |
Live Events
By
Fast
Company
(2009, 2010,
2013, 2018,
2020, 2022)
6x

FIRM AND TEAM EXPERIENCE
Angel Stadium of Anaheim Property Condition Assessment 3.20.2023 8 We create experiences that amplify a sense of
community and the joy felt in shared human moments.

Our depth of technical expertise and creative thinking since 1983 will allow us to deliver the most comprehensive facility assessment for Angel Stadium. Populous has defined and changed the face of major league baseball for more than 30 years.

Since the 1987 opening of Coca-Cola Field (formerly Pilot Field), each of the more than 135 ballparks Populous has designed are authentic to their locations, fans and teams.

Our focus on design has resulted in producing the highest ranked ballparks based on brand, revenues and fan experience in America. As we move into the future of creating broader fan experiences and adapting to changing economic markets, we remain the only architecture firm that offers a group of individuals dedicated to the design of major league baseball facilities.

This not only allows us to focus on the unique needs of your ballpark, it ensures you will have the most efficient, yet unique, future plans for your market and your money. We will work with you to ensure your enhancement plans are efficient and constructable while maintaining operations. Our expertise allows us to fully guide you through the process so you can make the most informed decisions about your future.

EXPERTISE
+

Arenas
+
Aviation
+
Ballparks
+ Collegiate
+
Convention
Centers
+

Esports
+
Events
+
Fair + Equine
+
Football Stadia
+
Hospitality
+
Mixed-Use
Development
+

Performance
Venues
+
Public Spaces
+
Recreation
+
Soccer Stadia

BALLPARK EXPERIENCE
24 MLB STADIUMS
25 SPRING

TRAINING

FACILITIES
15 BALLPARK

OF THE YEAR
AWARDS
3 BALLPARK OF

THE DECADE
AWARDS
54 MINOR LEAGUE

BALLPARKS

TARGET FIELD
Minneapolis, Minnesota
9 TARGET FIELD
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Angel Stadium of Anaheim Property Condition Assessment 3.20.2023 10 CRITICAL STRUCTURES W/

THORNTON TOMASETTI
Structural Engineer

CINLITTLE
Food Service

ME ENGINEERS
Mechanical, Electrical, &
Plumbing Systems

IDIBRI/SALAS O'BRIEN
Sound, Scoreboard and Broadcast

FUSCOE ENGINEERING
Civil Engineer
EWCG
Vertical Transportation

ME ENGINEERS
IT Systems, Electrical Systems,
Low Voltage/Technologies

SADDLEBACK ROOFING
Roofing Review
KPRS
Cost Estimator

CORE TEAM

SUBCONSULTANTS
PAT
TANGEN
Principal-In-Charge
HENRY
LAU
Project Architect
BEN
THOWE
Project Architect
ERIC

RANDOLPH
Project Manager

MAIN POINT OF CONTACT

MICHAEL

LOCKWOOD
Design Oversight

PROJECT TEAM
With 400+ staff across the Americas — Populous has a deep well of creative talent to offer. Key staff are hand- picked for each project, based on their specific experience and qualifications, and frequent collaborations with our larger inter-disciplinary group. This means innovation is always at the heart of our process. The Populous team will be led by our Los Angeles office with Eric Randolph as your Project Manager and main point of contact.

Eric will work with you to guide the visioning process and will be supported by the architectural and consulting engineering team.

COMMITMENT TO THE PROJECT
11 Pat is a Principal at Populous with more than 33 years of experience as an architect and project manager. During that time he has devoted his entire career to sports architecture, focused on MLB ballparks. He has played key roles on some of the greatest baseball stadiums in both the major and minor leagues.

Pat has an intimate understanding of key delivery issues related to each ballpark and has proven to be a valuable asset to clients. His work demonstrates a commitment to design resolution as well as attention to detail. His most recent projects include significant improvements at Rogers Center, Toronto Blue Jays, T-Mobile Park, Seattle Mariners and Petco Park, San Diego Padres. Pat has also played a leading role in most of the MLB facility assessments that are listed herein.

RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Angel Stadium of Anaheim Renovation, Anaheim, California Petco Park Improvements, San Diego, California
Safeco Field Improvements, Seattle, Washington
Audi Field, Washington, DC
Nationals Park, Washington, DC
Kauffman Stadium Renovations, Kansas City, Missouri
Peoria Spring Training Facility, Peoria, Arizona
Tempe Diablo Stadium, Tempe, Arizona
Scottsdale Stadium, Scottsdale, Arizona
New Fenway Park Study, Boston, Massachusetts
P&C Stadium, Syracuse, New York
Harbor Park, Norfolk, Virginia
Principal Park, Des Moines, Iowa
Durham Bulls Athletic Park, Durham, North Carolina
Modern Woodmen Park Renovation, Davenport, Iowa
Richmond County Bank Ballpark at St. George Station, Staten Island, New York
University of San Diego Fowler Park, San Diego, California University of South Florida Athletic Training Center, Tampa, Florida Penn State University Beaver Stadium Renovation, State College, Pennsylvania
University of Texas at San Antonio Athletics and Recreation Master Plan, San Antonio, Texas
Western Illinois University Recreation Center Expansion Study, Macomb, Illinois
Chinle Unified School District Sports Complex, Chinle, Arizona Cal State San Bernardino Recreation Center, San Bernardino, California
Arrowhead Stadium Club Renovation, Kansas City, Missouri Cincinnati Riverfront Stadium Study, Cincinnati, Ohio

EDUCATION
Master of Architecture, University
of Texas at Austin
Bachelor of Arts in Architecture,
Iowa State University

REGISTRATIONS
Registered Architect: Missouri,
Pennsylvania, Texas, Iowa
NCARB Certified

MEMBERSHIPS
American Institute of Architects
(AIA)
National Council of Architectural
Registration Boards (NCARB)

TIME COMMITMENT
40%
Pat
Tangen, AIA, NCARB

PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE, PRINCIPAL
Angel Stadium of Anaheim Property Condition Assessment 3.20.2023 12 As a Senior Principal with Populous, Michael is a member of the company’s Board of Directors and leader of its San Francisco office. As the design director for Populous’ convention center practice, Michael is actively involved in the programming, planning and design of convention center projects around the world. Michael provides design leadership and coordinates with client representatives to reach design goals through highly collaborative and interactive design workshops, encouraging cities and communities to actively participate in the design, planning and aesthetic of major civic structures.

RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Great American Ball Park, Cincinnati, Ohio
BMO Center Expansion, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
ICC Sydney, Sydney, Australia
SAFE Credit Union Convention Center Expansion & Renovation, Sacramento, California
Henry B. Gonzalez Convention Center Expansion, San Antonio, Texas Resch Expo Center, Ashwaubenon, Wisconsin
Anaheim Convention Center Expansion, Anaheim, California Oklahoma City Convention Center Site Selection, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
San Jose McEnery Convention Center Expansion & Renovation, San Jose, California
Ernest N. Morial Convention Center Master Plan Architect Orange County Convention Center Master Plan, Orlando, Florida Boston Convention and Exhibition Center, Boston, Massachusetts ocV!be, Burbank, California
George R. Brown Convention Center, Houston, Texas
Melbourne Convention Center Competition, Melbourne, Australia DLF International Exhibition & Convention Center, New Delhi, India Beijing Exhibition Center Competition, Beijing, China
Qatar National Convention & Exhibition Center (Stage 2), Education City, Doha, Qatar
Los Angeles Convention Center Expansion & Renovation, Los Angeles, California
MAPS 3 Convention Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Phoenix Convention Center Expansion, Phoenix, Arizona
Lexington Convention Center Study, Lexington, Kentucky
Utah Valley Convention Center, Provo, Utah
Birmingham-Jefferson County Convention Center, Birmingham, Alabama
Peoria Civic Center Expansion, Peoria, Illinois
Jacksonville Convention Center Expansion Study, Jacksonville, Florida

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Architecture,
California Polytechnic State
University, San Luis Obispo
Denmark’s International Study
Program, Copenhagen,
Denmark

REGISTRATIONS
Registered Architect: Alberta,
British Columbia, Florida,
Louisiana, Massachusetts,
Missouri, Oklahoma,
Saskatchewan, Texas
NCARB Certified

MEMBERSHIPS
American Institute of Architects
(AIA)
AWARDS
Engineering News Record
Midwest’s
“20 under 40”
Award

TIME COMMITMENT
10%
Michael
Lockwood, AIA, NCARB

DESIGN OVERSIGHT, SENIOR PRINCIPAL
13 Eric Randolph keeps sustainability at the forefront of the design process to deliver high-performance spaces to clients and communities. Based in the Los Angeles office, he is experienced in both professional league stadium and training facility design, having designed for MLS, MLB, NFL, the FIFA World Cup and the Olympics.

A diligent and well-respected leader, Eric has completed projects around the world including, Canada, Australia and Brazil. Eric served as design manager for Q2 Stadium, BMO Field and Banc of California Stadium. He is equally as passionate about sharing his expertise, having taught architecture in Barcelona and Kuala Lumpur.

RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Banc of California Stadium Exposition Park - Los Angeles* BMO Field Expansion, Toronto, Canada*
Dodger Stadium Renovations, Los Angeles, California*
Estadio Itaquera – SCCP Interiors & Environmental Graphics, Sao Paulo*
Fox Network Center & New Executive Building, Los Angeles, California*
Getty Research Institute, Los Angeles, California*
Giants Stadium Suite Renovation, The Meadowlands, New Jersey* Hohokam Stadium & Lew Wolff Training Complex, Mesa, Arizona* LAFC Performance Center, CalState, Los Angeles, California* Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Renovations, Los Angeles, California*
Palm Springs Desert Resorts Convention & Visitors Authority, Palm Springs, California*
Perth Arena, Perth, Australia*
Q2 Stadium, Austin, Texas*
Santa Monica Core Performance Center & Central Plant Facility, Santa Monica, California*
St. David’s Performance Center, Austin, Texas*
The Ford Center at The Star, Frisco, Texas*
The Gas Company Tower, Los Angeles, California*
The VELO Sports Center Velodrome, Carson, California*
Tokyo International Forum, Tokyo, Japan*
*Denotes work experience completed with another firm

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science in
Architecture, The University of
Texas at Arlington School
Master of Architecture, Harvard
University Graduate School of
Design

REGISTRATIONS
Registered Architect: California,
Texas
NCARB Certified

TIME COMMITMENT
60%
Eric
Randolph, NCARB

PROJECT MANAGER, ASSOCIATE PRINCIPAL
Angel Stadium of Anaheim Property Condition Assessment 3.20.2023 14 Henry Lau approaches architecture and design as a holistic process to problem solving. As the leader of Populous' LA office, Henry brings over 20 years of experience implementing strategies to deliver world- class sporting and entertainment venues. He works collaboratively with partners and clients, building trust every step of the way.

With experience leading large project teams, Henry is committed to generating innovative results while managing resources, driving initiatives, and consistently maintaining schedule and budget. Henry has contributed to the design and delivery of many iconic venues across North America, ranging from NBA arenas and airports in California to Pac-12 athletic facilities and stadiums in Canada.

RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
BMO Field Stadium Renovation, Toronto, Canada*
CAL Memorial Stadium Renovation, Berkeley, California*
Cashman Field Ballpark Master Plan, Las Vegas, Nevada*
Chase Center Arena, San Francisco, California*
Empower Field Premium Analysis, Denver, Colorado*
Fifth Third Field Ballpark, Toledo, Ohio*
Greater Nevada Field Ballpark, Reno, Nevada*
LA Metro Crenshaw-LAX Light Rail, Los Angeles, California* LAX Tom Bradley International Airport Terminal Expansion, Los Angeles, California*
Levi’s Stadium | San Francisco 49ers, Santa Clara, California* Long Beach State University Tulowitzki Batting Facility, Long Beach, California*
Mid-America Convention Center & Arena, Council Bluffs, Iowa* OSU Athletics Master Plan, Corvallis, Oregon*
OSU Basketball Center Practice Facility, Corvallis, Oregon* OSU Beth Ray Center for Academic Support, Corvallis, Oregon* OSU Reser Stadium Expansion, Corvallis, Oregon*
OSU Sports Performance Training Facility, Corvallis, Oregon* Purdue Ross-Ade Stadium Renovation, West Lafayette, Indiana* Rancho Los Amigos Sports Center Master Plan, Downey, California* Sacramento Republic FC Stadium, Sacramento, California* Santa Barbara Airport, Santa Barbara, California*
San Jose State University Spartan Recreation and Aquatic Center, San Jose, California*
Sports Authority Field Re-Imaging, Denver, Colorado*
Stanford University Athletics Master Plan, Stanford, California* UC Berkeley Memorial Stadium Renovation, Berkeley, California* UC Berkeley Evans Diamond Master Plan, Berkeley, California* *Denotes work experience completed with another firm

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Architecture,
Carleton University

REGISTRATIONS
American Institute of Architects
(AIA)

AFFILIATIONS
Cal Poly Pomona - Architectural
Thesis Advisor
California State University Long
Beach - Architectural Thesis
Advisor

TIME COMMITMENT
50%
Henry
Lau, AIA

PROJECT ARCHITECT, ASSOCIATE PRINCIPAL
15 Since joining Populous in 2011, Ben has worked on various projects in both MiLB and MLB. He has worked on technical document delivery and the schematic, design development and construction document phases for a number of projects and is responsible for management and operations during the construction administration phase. Ben has also performed a number of MLB facility assessments for projects including the Seattle Mariners, St. Louis Cardinals, and Pittsburgh Pirates.

Additionally, Ben works on collegiate facilities such as a number of projects at Texas Tech University including their new collegiate ballpark on campus.

RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
T-Mobile Park, Seattle, Washington
Busch Stadium, St. Louis, MO
Petco Park Improvements, San Diego, California
PNC Park Improvements, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Texas Tech University Rip Griffin Park Expansion & Renovation, Lubbock, Texas
Texas Tech University Basketball Practice Facility, Lubbock, Texas Kansas State University Vanier Football Complex, Manhattan, Kansas Baylor University McLane Stadium, Waco, Texas

EDUCATION
Master of Architecture, Kansas
State University, Manhattan,
KS

REGISTRATIONS
Registered Architect: Kansas
NCARB Certified

MEMBERSHIPS
American Institute of Architects
(AIA)

TIME COMMITMENT
60%
Ben
Thowe, AIA, NCARB

PROJECT ARCHITECT, SENIOR ASSOCIATE
Angel Stadium of Anaheim Property Condition Assessment 3.20.2023 16 TRUIST PARK
Atlanta, Georgia
17 Scott leads the electrical design and lighting design groups at ME Engineers. With over 30 years of
experience, Scott is known as one of the area’s top
engineers for electrical systems and lighting design.

Scott provides input on system selections and
establishes state-of-the-art performance criteria,
delivering electrical and lighting systems that are
sustainable, energy-efficient, and maintenance-
friendly for the client.

RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Angel Stadium Renovation, Anaheim, CA
Dodger Stadium, 2019 Renovation & Upgrade
Projects, Los Angeles, CA
Chase Field, Phoenix, AZ
Coors Field, Denver, CO
Globe Life Field, Arlington, TX
Great American Ballpark, Cincinnati, OH
Tropicana Field, St. Petersburg, FL
Oracle Park, San Francisco, CA
Minute Maid Park, Houston, TX
PNC Park, Pittsburgh, PA
Petco Park, San Diego, CA
Nationals Park, Washington, DC
Target Field, Minneapolis, MN
Truist Park, Cumberland, GA

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science, Electrical Engineering,
University of Colorado - Denver

REGISTRATIONS
Professional Engineer: California, Colorado, and 24
other states

MEMBERSHIPS
IEEE: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers USGBC: U.S. Green Building Council

TIME COMMITMENT
25%
Scott
Gerard, PE, LEED AP

PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE

ME ENGINEERS
Jonathon brings over 30 years of experience in the
food facilities design consulting field to the team. He is a client-focused, results-oriented project manager
with a proven track record. He has designed and
managed projects of all sizes within varied markets.

EDUCATION
University of Hawaii, Manoa, Honolulu, HI

CERTIFICATIONS
Foodservice Consultants Society International,
Associate Member
National Association of Food Equipment
Manufacturers
Certified Food Service Professional

TIME COMMITMENT
40%
Jonathon
Turnbull, CFSP

FOOD SERVICE DESIGN

CINILITTLE
Angel Stadium of Anaheim Property Condition Assessment 3.20.2023 18 Laura Marchand is a principal at ME Engineers
with more than 11 years of experience. She is
responsible for the electrical system design and
project coordination, from schematic design
through construction administration. Her project
experience spans healthcare facilities, sports and
entertainment venues, higher education facilities,
and large-scale commercial developments.

Laura excels at facilitating complex coordination
among multiple trades to resolve issues quickly
and meet project schedules. She brings an open,
collaborative approach to each project.

RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Dodger Stadium, 2019 Renovation Los Angeles, CA
Dodger Stadium, Various Renovations, Los
Angeles, CA
Padres Lexus and Compass Premier Clubs, San
Diego, CA
Honda Center Master Plan, Anaheim, CA
Rupp Arena, Lexington, KY
Banc of California Stadium, Los Angeles, CA
Crypto.com Arena 2023-2024 Renovations, Los
Angeles, CA
SoFi Stadium, DAS, Inglewood, CA
Rose Bowl Stadium, Sports Lighting, Pasadena, CA

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science, Physics, University of
California - Los Angeles

REGISTRATIONS
Professional Engineer: California

MEMBERSHIPS
USGBC: U.S. Green Building Council

TIME COMMITMENT
45%
Laura
Marchand, PE, LEED AP

ELECTRICAL

ME ENGINEERS
Chris Jones is Chief Information Officer at ME
Engineers. He defines the strategy of how technology
is selected and integrated on a project. His holistic
approach considers architectural, construction,
and budget requirements with an understanding
of business and operational requirements. His
technical experience includes 3D physical planning
and design of technology infrastructure and systems
such as: telecommunications infrastructure,
telephone systems (VoIP), converged data networks
(WAN/LAN), wireless data networks (Wi-Fi/WLAN),
distributed antenna systems (DAS), distributed
television (IPTV), security systems, and building
management systems

RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Angel Stadium Renovation, Anaheim, CA
Oracle Park, San Francisco, CA
Busch Stadium, St. Louis, MO
Nationals Park, Washington, DC
Yankee Stadium, Bronx, NY
Petco Park, San Diego, CA
Chase Field, Phoenix, AZ
Citi Field, New York, NY
Comerica Park, Detroit, MI
LoanDepot Park, Miami, FL
Great American Ballpark, Cincinnati, OH
Kauffman Stadium, Kansas City, MO
Minute Maid Park, Houston, TX
PNC Park, Pittsburgh, PA
Target Field, Minneapolis, MN

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science, Architectural Engineering,
Kansas State University

REGISTRATIONS
Professional Engineer: Kansas
Registered Communications Distribution Designer

TIME COMMITMENT
35%
Chris
Jones, RCDD

TECHNOLOGY/IT

ME ENGINEERS
19 David Landau is a senior associate at ME Engineers
with more than 11 years in the industry. His
experience includes a wide variety of projects,
including commercial developments, healthcare
facilities, and higher education buildings. David is
known for his effective communication skills that
propel collaboration with the project team and
contractors and result in solutions that meet the
owner’s budget and intent.

RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
LA Dodgers 2023 Projects, Los Angeles, CA
Fresno Grizzlies Ballpark Improvements, Fresno, CA
Petco Park, San Diego, CA
Staples Center Refresh 2020, Los Angeles, CA
Levi Stadium - 2021 Improvements, Santa Clara, CA
El Camino College Stadium, Torrance, CA *
Visual Arts Complex Renovation, California State
University Fullerton, Fullerton, CA
*Denotes work experience completed with
another firm

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science, Engineering Management,
University of Arizona

REGISTRATIONS
Professional Engineer: California

MEMBERSHIPS
ASPE: American Society of Plumbing Engineers

TIME COMMITMENT
45%
David
Landau, PE, LEED AP

PLUMBING

ME ENGINEERS
Nick Theimer is an associate at ME Engineers who
is directly involved in the engineering of buildings
from schematic design through construction
administration. Nick is a proponent of designing
building systems that are “smart” in nature to create
sustainable, energy efficient buildings that will stand the test of time. He has been involved in designing
various NHL arenas and MLB ballparks as well as
libraries, offices buildings, restaurants and private
residences.

RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
T-Mobile Park 2023 Improvements, Seattle, WA
T-Mobile Park Renovation, Seattle, WA
Truist Park, Cumberland, GA
Bank of America Stadium, Bunker Suites,
Charlotte, NC
Broncos UCHealth Training Center, Englewood, CO
Emory Sports Medicine Complex, Atlanta, GA
Climate Pledge Arena, Seattle, WA
Denny Sanford Premier Center, Sioux Falls, SD
Nido & Mariana Qubein Arena, Conference Center
and Hotel, High Point, NC
Rogers Place, Edmonton, AB
T-Mobile Arena, Las Vegas, NV
UBS Arena at Belmont Park, Elmont, NY
The Monument, Rapid City, SD

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science, Architectural Engineering,
Kansas State University

REGISTRATIONS
Professional Engineer: Colorado, California

TIME COMMITMENT
45%
Nick
Theimer, PE, LEED AP

MECHANICAL

ME ENGINEERS
Angel Stadium of Anaheim Property Condition Assessment 3.20.2023 20 Eric Stovner has over 35 years extensive experience
in responsible charge of very diverse projects, from
conceptual design to construction documentation, peer
review and investigation, managing people positively
to suit their strengths delivering projects on schedule and within budget. He has a reputation for innovation,
responsiveness and trustworthiness, having extensive
expertise in structural systems and materials.

RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Angel Stadium - JumboTron Scoreboard
Replacement (1994), Anaheim, CA
Angel Stadium - Structural and Seismic Evaluation
(1996-1998), Anaheim, CA
Angel Stadium - Development of phased and
prioritized maintenance and repairs (1999 -
current), Anaheim, CA
Angel Stadium - Structural Condition Assessment,
Anaheim, CA
Angel Stadium - Left Field Scoreboard, Anaheim, CA
Western Metal Building - Structural Evaluation, San
Diego, CA
Dodger Stadium - Due Diligence Structural
Assessment, Los Angeles, CA
Toronto Skydome - Due Diligence Structural
Assessment, Toronto, ON, CA

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science, Architectural Engineering, Cal
Poly - San Luis Obispo

REGISTRATIONS
Structural Engineer: California #S4204

MEMBERSHIPS
Member, American Society of Civil Engineers
ASCE 31 and ASCE 41 Standards Committees
on Seismic Evaluation and Rehabilitation of
Buildings, 1998- 2014

TIME COMMITMENT
60%
Eric C.

Stovner, SE, LEED AP O+M

STRUCTURAL

CRITICAL STRUCTURES
Matthew Farber joined Thornton Tomasetti in 2015
and has more than 20 years of experience with
a variety of project types, including commercial,
residential, education and sports. As Principal, his
responsibilities include the project management and
engineering lead for structural design and analysis
on projects. In addition, Matt is the Office Director for the Kansas City office.

RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Toyota Field, Madison, AL
Wrigley Field - The 1060 Project, Chicago, IL
Mercedes-Benz Stadium, Atlanta, GA
Baylor University Basketball Pavilion, Waco, TX
U.S. Bank Stadium, Minneapolis, MN
Climate Pledge Arena, Seattle, WA
Haymarket Practice Facility, Lincoln, NE
Pinnacle Bank Arena, Lincoln, NE
American Royal, Kansas City, MO
Werner Park, Omaha, NE

EDUCATION
Master of Science, Civil Engineering with Structural
Engineering Emphasis, University of Nebraska-
Lincoln
Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, University
of Nebraska-Lincoln

REGISTRATIONS
Licensed Structural Engineer: Nebraska, Kansas
Professional Engineer: Michigan, Missouri,
Nebraska

TIME COMMITMENT
20%
Matthew
Farber, PE, SE

PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE

THORNTON TOMASETTI
21 Mr. Warner has more than 35 years of experience
in the structural engineering for office, retail,
educational, healthcare, industrial, justice and sports facilities. His hands-on approach to all phases of the
design process, from concept through construction,
has resulted in systems that address owner, designer
and builder interests.

RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Arvest Ballpark, Springdale, AR
Madison Ballpark, Madison, AL
TD Ameritrade Park Omaha, Omaha, NE
Tropicana Dome, St. Petersburg, FL*
Kauffman Stadium Renovation, Kansas City, MO
Kauffman Stadium Renovation and Improvements,
Kansas City, MO
University of Missouri-Taylor Brookfield Building
and Dan Devine Pavilion, Columbia, MO*
U.S. Bank Stadium, Minneapolis, MN
*Denotes work experience completed with
another firm

EDUCATION
Master of Science, Architectural Engineering,
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Bachelor of Science, Architectural Engineering,
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

REGISTRATIONS
Licensed Structural Engineer: Illinois
Professional Engineer: Michigan, New York, District
of Columbia

LEED AP

TIME COMMITMENT
50%
Hansford B.

Warner III, PE, SE, LEED AP

PROJECT MANAGER

THORNTON TOMASETTI
Michael Cochran has an extensive background in the
design of both new building structures as well as the
seismic retrofit and renovation of existing buildings.

His past projects include multifamily, multistory,
wood-framed residential buildings, commercial
office and retail buildings utilizing steel and concrete framing, concrete topping over metal deck floors or
cast-in-place construction. Mike has also provided
facilities work for local aerospace companies.

RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Sorenson Gym, Los Angeles, CA
Seasons at Compton, Compton, CA
Pueblo Nuevo Community Center, Los Angeles, CA
Howard Hughes Center, Las Vegas, NV
Western Plaza, Los Angeles, CA
Mariposa Place Apartments, Los Angeles, CA
VW/Audi North American Design Center, Santa
Monica, CA
Jefferson at Hollywood, Hollywood, CA
Santa Monica Fire Station No. 1, Santa Monica, CA

EDUCATION
Executive Program in Management, University of
California - Los Angeles
Master of Science, Civil Engineering, Structures,
California State University - Long Beach
Bachelor of Science, Animal Science, University of
California - Davis

REGISTRATIONS
Licensed Structural Engineer: California
Licensed Civil Engineer: California
NCSEA Strucutral Engineering Certification Board
Registered California Emergency Management
Agency Safety Assessment Program Evaluator
Certified DSA Structural Plan Reviewer

TIME COMMITMENT
80%
Michael
Cochran,PE, SE, SECB

STRUCTURAL ENGINEER

THORNTON TOMASETTI
Angel Stadium of Anaheim Property Condition Assessment 3.20.2023 22 Alberto Cuevas has been involved with the design,
assessment, retrofit, inspection and peer review of
low-to-mid-rise commercial, residential, industrial,
hospital, office and education buildings, and with the
design of telecommunications infrastructure. He has
worked on projects in various countries, including
Costa Rica, New Zealand, United States and Mexico.

His expertise in design and assessment focuses on
steel, reinforced concrete and masonry structures.

Alberto is proficient in linear and nonlinear analysis
of structures and in nonlinear finite micro-element
modeling of structural components.

RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
QBE Stadium Canopy and Seating Platforms, Peer
Review, Auckland, NZL
Lincoln School, Heredia, CRI*
KiwiRail-EQ Damage, Christchurch, NZL
Bayside Apartments, 18 the Esplanade, Sumner, NZL
42 Maces Road, Christchurch, NZL
CentrePort Properties, Wellington, NZL
CEDISA Distribution Center and Logistics, Alajuela,
CRI*
Confidential Project, Mexico City, MEX
Confidential Project, Mexico City, MEX
*Denotes work experience completed with
another firm

EDUCATION
Doctor of Philosophy, Civil Engineering, University
of Canterbury, New Zealand
Master of Science, Earthquake Engineering &
Engineering Seismology, University of Pavia
Bachelor of Engineering, Civil Engineering (with
Honors), University of Costa Rica

REGISTRATIONS
Licensed Civil Engineer: Costa Rica

TIME COMMITMENT
80%
Alberto
Cuevas, Ph.D.

FORENSIC ENGINEER

THORNTON TOMASETTI
John Essig has over fifteen years of experience
in the AEC industry. His holistic background aids
him in evaluating properties for structural damage
and profit loss. John’s expertise in condition
assessments relies on his strong background in
structural analysis and planning, as well as an adept
understanding of concrete and steel structures.

John also has experience in structural masonry
design, soil mechanics and foundations, seismic
analysis and design, and wind engineering. He has
performed building façade investigations, condition
assessments and concept-level building design for
insurance claims.

RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
The Consumers Building - Critical and Ongoing
Façade Examinations, Chicago, IL
The Century Building - Critical and Ongoing
Façade Examinations, Chicago, IL
Metropolitan Tower - Exterior Façade Repairs,
Chicago, IL
BMO Harris Park Investigation, Villa Park, IL
The Columbian - Phases 2 and 3, Chicago, IL
Loyola University Richard J. Klarchek Information
Commons, Chicago, IL
Macy's Warehouse Phase 2, Minooka, IL
The Address Fountain Views, Dubai, UAE

EDUCATION
Master of Science, Civil Engineering (Structures),
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Master of Architecture, (Structures), University of
Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Bachelor of Architecture, Architecture (Minor in
Forestry and Natural Resources), University of
California - Berkeley

REGISTRATIONS
NCARB

TIME COMMITMENT
80%
John
Essig,
FAÇADE AND ENCLOSURE

THORNTON TOMASETTI
23 As Fuscoe’s CEO/President, John is responsible for
strategic planning to achieve the firm’s long-term goals.

He oversees engineering, environmental and survey/
mapping services, as well as marketing/client relations for all four Fuscoe office locations. Utilizing his strong interpersonal skills, John will continue to create excel- lent working relationships to ensure client satisfaction.

With more than 35 years of experience, John brings a
wealth of civil engineering design expertise in urban,
commercial/industrial, mixed-use, master plan commu-
nities, infill and complex entitlement projects. John’s resourceful, can-do attitude is invaluable to clients.

RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Honda Center, Anaheim, CA
Avalon Anaheim Stadium Apartments, Anaheim, CA
ARTIC, Anaheim, CA
The Packing District, Anaheim, CA
Colony Park, Anaheim, CA
Finamore Apartments, Anaheim, CA
Buena Esperanza Affordable Housing, Anaheim, CA

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, University
of California, Irvine

REGISTRATIONS
Professional Engineer: California #44568

MEMBERSHIPS
HomeAid Orange County - Board of Directors
American Society of Civil Engineers
Building Industry Association - Urban Infill Committee
Urban Land Institute - Multi-Housing Council

TIME COMMITMENT
60%
John
Olivier, PE

SENIOR ENGINEER, CIVIL

FUSCOE ENGINEERING
As Quality Control/Quality Assurance Manager, Bob
leads the Fuscoe Quality Mindset initiative. He and
his committee are committed and focused on Quality
Assurance and Quality Control companywide. Bob’s
practice is key to his development of quality assurance training and quality control review for plan sets from all of Fuscoe Engineering’s offices. A proven professional, Bob has taken a leadership role in teaching, nurturing
and training Fuscoe staff members to maintain high
engineering performance standards. His meticulous
attention to detail, structure and appearance is key
in ensuring top quality work and makes him a strong
resource for Fuscoe Engineering.

RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
UCSD North Campus Housing Complex, San
Diego, CA
22nd District Agricultural Association - Sewer Force
Main Replacement, Del Mar, CA
Clairemont High School Technology Building, San
Diego, CA
Imperial Valley Center for Exceptional Children, El
Centro, CA
San Diego Unified Design Guidelines Update, San
Diego, CA

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, University
of Southern California

REGISTRATIONS
Professional Engineer: California #41903

TIME COMMITMENT
60%
Robert A.

Chase, PE, LEED AP

QC QA MANAGER, CIVIL

FUSCOE ENGINEERING
Angel Stadium of Anaheim Property Condition Assessment 3.20.2023 24 As the Vice President of Preconstruction, Assaf
manages and oversees the estimating department,
which covers all market sector groups at KPRS. Assaf
works with his team to forecast project costs and
expertly determine necessary resources for projects
based on cost estimates and budgetary restraints.

Assaf has a keen understanding for gathering the
proper details and compiling data to estimate all
production costs according to specifications. This
process includes the consideration of raw materials,
labor, equipment, tools and transportation for all
estimations. He oversees all competitive bidding,
negotiating, quantity take-off, conceptual estimates,
proposal development and technical services.

RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Confidential Corporate Campus, Diamond Bar, CA
Angel Stadium Renovations, Anaheim CA
Angel Stadium Halo Club, Anaheim, CA
Facebook tenant improvements, Los Angeles, CA
Microsoft tenant improvements, Aliso Viejo, CA

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science, Electrical Engineering,
University of California - Irvine

TIME COMMITMENT
50%
Assaf
Nachshon

COST ESTIMATION
KPRS
Bob brings over 40 years of experience in the
construction industry on projects ranging from
hospitality, healthcare, residential, education, sports and large corporate offices. Before joining KPRS
in 2010, Bob worked for Pan-Pacific Mechanical
as Vice President for five years and prior to that,
twenty six years for Turner Construction where
he was Vice President of Operations. As Project
Director, Bob will take a personal interest in this
project and attend weekly meetings in order to fully
understand the client’s objectives and programs.

His primary responsibility will be overall leadership
and oversight of the project.

RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Angel Stadium Renovations, Anaheim CA
Angel Stadium Halo Club, Anaheim, CA
Orange County Great Park - Sports Park, Irvine, CA
Marina Park, Newport Beach, CA
Grand California Hotel, Anaheim, CA

EDUCATION
Masters of Business Administration, California
State University - Fullerton
Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering,Rutgers
University

REGISTRATIONS
F.M.I Leadership and M.A.P. Training
OSHA 30 Hour and CPR Certified
E.I.T Civil Engineering

TIME COMMITMENT
100%
Bob
Berenguer

COST ESTIMATION
KPRS
25 Kenneth joined Edgett Williams as a Consultant in
2023. Prior to joining Edgett Williams, Kenneth was the Director of Sales over Construction and Modernization
for TK Elevator. He started in the industry in 2012
and has had the opportunity to work with Schindler,
Otis, and TK Elevator in various roles from project
manager, senior project manager, project executive,
national major projects manager, and director.

RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Salesforce Tower, San Francisco, CA
Park Tower at Transbay, San Francisco, CA
Santa Clara Gateway Offices, Santa Clara, CA
Levi’s Stadium, Santa Clara, CA
Transbay Transit Center, San Francisco, CA
Oceanwide Center, San Francisco, CA
Chase Center Arena, San Francisco, CA
CPMC Van Ness and St. Lukes Campus, San
Francisco, CA
500 Folsom (Transbay Block 9), San Francisco, CA
303 Second St., San Francisco, CA
101 California St., San Francisco, CA
399 Fremont, San Francisco, CA
601 Oakland City Center, Oakland, CA
Washington Hospital Healthcare System, Fremont, CA
8th and Figueroa, Los Angeles, CA
City View Plaza 200 Park, Santa Jose, CA
Genesis Towers, South San Francisco, CA
MSG Sphere, Las Vegas, NV
Lucas Museum of Narrative Art, Los Angeles, CA

EDUCATION
Master of Business Administration, San Francisco
State University
Bachelor of Science, Management Science,
University of California - San Diego

REGISTRATIONS
Project Management Professional, PMP

TIME COMMITMENT
50%
Kenneth
Lau, PMP

CONSULTANT
EWCG
Thom Chiaramonte, AIA joined Edgett Williams as
a Senior Consultant in 2003. Prior to joining Edgett
Williams, Mr. Chiaramonte was the senior techni-
cal adviser for the architectural firm NBBJ in San
Francisco. Thom is both a registered architect in
California and member of the American Institute
of Architects; he brings with him over twenty-five
years of experience in architecture and the design
process. With a degree in Architecture and his profi-
ciency with AutoCAD and Object Based Design/
Building Information Modeling tools, he leverages
both architectural and technological skillsets in his
role as a liaison to the design team.

RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Banc of California Stadium, Los Angeles, CA
San Diego Central Courthouse – San Diego, CA
UCSF Mission Bay, San Francisco, CA
Pier 70 Building 12, San Francisco, CA
UCLA Learning and Teaching Center, Los Angeles,
CA
Apple Tower Theater, Los Angeles, CA
UCSD CAL IT2, San Diego, CA
UC Berkeley - CITRIS II - Davis Hall, Berkeley, CA
Ninth and Figueroa Towers, Los Angeles, CA
360 Residences, San Jose, CA
510 Townsend, San Francisco, CA
Market Square, San Francisco, CA
Salesforce Transit Center, San Francisco, CA
Google Campus, Mountain View, CA
NVIDIA Headquarters, Santa Clara, CA
Apple Campus, Cupertino, CA

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Architecture, California Polytechnic
University - San Luis Obispo

REGISTRATIONS
American Institute of Architects (AIA)

TIME COMMITMENT
20%
Thom
Chiaramonte, AIA

PROJECTS DIRECTOR
EWCG
Angel Stadium of Anaheim Property Condition Assessment 3.20.2023 26 Ben Cating provides thought leadership and project
management for technology and acoustics in high-
capacity venues and mixed-use projects. Ben is
sought by clients who want to leverage technology
to spark engagement. He understands the pressures
on venue management from competing stakeholders
and is able to help facilitate and validate decisions.

Ben has been part of the Salas O’Brien team since
2003.

RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
American Family Fields of Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ
Banc of California Stadium, Los Angeles, CA
Chase Field, Phoenix, AZ
Children’s Mercy Park, Kansas City, KS
Climate Pledge Arena, Seattle, WA
FITTEAM Ballpark of the Palm Beaches, West
Palm Beach, FL
Minute Maid Park, Houston, TX
Oracle Park, San Francisco, CA
Petco Park, San Diego, CA
Q2 Stadium, Austin, TX
Salt River Fields at Talking Stick, Maricopa County, AZ Scottsdale Stadium, Scottsdale, AZ
T-Mobile Park, Seattle, WA
Dallas Baptist University Horner Ballpark, Dallas, TX
University of California Berkeley Softball Field,
Berkeley, CA
University of South Carolina Softball Stadium at
Beckham Field, Columbia, SC

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science, Electrical Engineering
Louisiana Tech University

MEMBERSHIPS
US Green Building Council
LEED Accredited Professional 2009

TIME COMMITMENT
10%
Ben
Cating, LEED AP

ACOUSTICS & TECHNOLOGY

SALAS O'BRIEN
David Battershell is a talented project manager
for technology in new construction and renovation
projects. He is adept at design for complex systems
reliant on the interaction of many systems (IT, AV,
security, DAS, building management, etc). David
joined the team in 2013 and demonstrates positive
energy in leading teams to develop great solutions.

RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Alamodome, San Antonio, TX
American Family Fields of Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ
Banc of California Stadium, Los Angeles, CA
F1 Circuit of the Americas, Travis County, TX
Climate Pledge Arena, Seattle, WA
Crypto.com Arena, Los Angeles, CA
FITTEAM Ballpark of the Palm Beaches, West
Palm Beach, FL
Q2 Stadium, Austin, TX
Highmark Stadium, Buffalo, NY
NFL Jacksonville Jaguars Training Facility,
Jacksonville, FL
Pro Football Hall of Fame, Canton, OH
US Bank Stadium, Minneapolis, MN
Abilene Christian University - Wildcat Football
Stadium, Abilene, TX
University of Texas Darrell K Royal Texas Memorial
Stadium Expansion, Austin, TX

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science, Electrical Engineering,
University of Texas at Austin

REGISTRATIONS
BICSI Registered Communications Distribution
Designer #265124

MEMBERSHIPS
AVIXA Membership

TIME COMMITMENT
10%
David
Battershell, RCDD

ACOUSTICS & TECHNOLOGY

SALAS O'BRIEN
27 SADDLEBACK ROOFING
SCOPE OF WORK:
+ Roofing
LOCATION:

+
1645 W Orangewood
Ave
Orange, CA 92868
FIRM PROFILE:

Saddleback Roofing, located right adjacent to Angel Stadium, in Orange, CA, has been serving single membrane residential and commercial roofing needs in the Southern California region since 1956. We take great pride in quality roofing projects for the commercial community including architects, general contractors and developers.

Our work includes all types of single membrane roofing including EPDM, TPO and other trade names. We have done significant roofing projects for Honda Center, Ralph’s and Von’s grocery store chains to Hampton and Marriot hotels. Our work force is committed to safety. We are trained in working at heights and will take all precautions while reviewing the condition of the Angel Stadium roofing at height. We look forward to serving as the single membrane roofing reviewer for Angel Stadium and the Populous team.

We will select staff that are trained for such reviews and can perform these roofing reviews in the three days allotted.

For our firm's understanding of the scope of work
as well as an anticipated approach, outline of tasks
necessary for successful completion, and suggestions
or special concerns, please refer to Section 2 Scope of Services & Schedule beginning on page 40.

UNDERSTANDING OF NEED
Angel Stadium of Anaheim Property Condition Assessment 3.20.2023 28 TARGET FIELD
Minneapolis, Minnesota
29 RELEVANT FACILITY ASSESSMENTS
Seattle Mariners
T-Mobile Park
In 2018, Populous engaged Brailsford & Dunlavey to investigate the extent, cost and timing of potential capital improvements for T-Mobile Park through the fiscal year 2036. The primary objective of this project was to identify the cost of necessary capital improvements required to maintain T-Mobile Park as a first-class Major League ballpark.

To accomplish this, the Consulting Team completed a systematic and thorough evaluation of T-Mobile Park by completing four (4) critical tasks:
- Development of an improvements-to-date or “baseline” matrix that quantifies previous levels of investment through 2023;
- Conducting a three-day facility assessment that included visual inspections of key building systems;
- Development of an online survey to examine patron attitudes; and - The identification of over 400 investments required over the next 20 years across 26 key building systems or areas.

Additionally, the Mariners and PFD sought to examine potential “upgrade improvements” designed to enhance and maintain the spectator experience, and quantify the economic and fiscal benefits of maintaining T-Mobile Park in a first-class manner.

NAME:

Capital Improvements
And Master Plan
LOCATION:

Seattle, W
ashington, USA
COMPLETION DATE:
2018

PROJECT DET
AILS:

Baseline Improvements
Analysis
Facility Assessment
Patron Survey
Necessary
Improvements Analysis
Upgrade Improvements
Benefits
Analysis
PROJECT TEAM:

B&D V
enues - Team Lead
Populous - Lead
Architect
Diversified Systems -
A/V Engineer
CLIENT REFERENCE:

Ryan van Maarth
Sr
. Director, Construction and Planning
E: [email protected]
PR

OJECT DESCRIPTION AND SCOPEPROJECT DETAILS

FEATURED ASSESSMENT
Angel Stadium of Anaheim Property Condition Assessment 3.20.2023 30 Pittsburgh Pirates
PNC Park
- Capital expenditures top to bottom review of all ballpark building systems with engineering and architectural staff
- Report of all capital expenditure findings
- Design master plan for PNC Park for the next generation baseball experience
- Level by level improvements to improve fan flow, food and beverage options, enhance the look and feel of PNC Park and to further capitalize on one of the best ballparks in MLB - Multiple rounds of design and review in highly interactive process with senior Pirates management
- The master plan resulted in five projects being implemented and open for the 2015 season
- All improvements were priced by a local contractor (Mascaro Construction) and reported to Pirates for budget purposes - Our relationship with Mascaro Construction continued through the implementation of all five projects
- Master plan continues to be a living document with the Pirates as they actively plan to continue to make phased changes to PNC Park
NAME:

Capital Improvements and Master Plan
LOCA
TION:

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA

COMPLETION DA
TE:
2013 (Master Plan), 2014 CapEx Plan,

2014 (Renovations), 2015 & 2016

(Renovations)
PROJECT TEAM:

Populous - Lead
Architect

CLIENT REFERENCE:

Frank Coonelly

President
Pittsburgh Pirates
E: [email protected]
PR

OJECT DESCRIPTION AND SCOPEPROJECT DETAILS

CENTER FIELD KIDS' AREA - BEFORE

CENTER FIELD KIDS' AREA - AFTER
31 NAME: Busch Stadium Capital Improvements
Plan
LOCATION: St. Louis, Missouri, USA
COMPLETION DATE: 2018
PROJECT DETAILS: - Site Development
- Structural (building structure,
canopies, ramps, stairs, etc.)
- Exterior Systems (roofs, walls,
windows, doors, etc.)
- Interior Systems (partitions,
flooring, casework, glazing, doors,
etc.);
- Fire Protection (pumps, piping,
valves, sprinkler heads, etc.);
- Conveying Systems (elevators,
escalators);
- Mechanical Systems (central
plant, HVAC systems, controls,
equipment, plumbing systems, gas
systems, fuel systems, etc.);
- Electrical Systems (electrical
power, equipment, lighting fixtures
and controls, field lighting, etc.);
- Stadium Seating;
- Furniture, Fixtures & Equipment
PROJECT TEAM: Brailsford & Dunlavey - Team Lead
Populous - Lead Architect
NAME: Petco Park Capital Improvements Plan
and Master Plan
LOCATION: San Diego, California, USA
COMPLETION DATE: 2015
PROJECT DETAILS: - Site Development
- Structural (building structure,
canopies, ramps, stairs, etc.)
- Exterior Systems (roofs, walls,
windows, doors, etc.)
- Interior Systems (partitions,
flooring, casework, glazing, doors,
etc.);
- Fire Protection (pumps, piping,
valves, sprinkler heads, etc.);
- Conveying Systems (elevators,
escalators);
- Mechanical Systems (central
plant, HVAC systems, controls,
equipment, plumbing systems, gas
systems, fuel systems, etc.);
- Electrical Systems (electrical
power, equipment, lighting fixtures
and controls, field lighting, etc.);
- Stadium Seating;
- Furniture, Fixtures & Equipment
PROJECT TEAM: Populous - Lead Architect
Angel Stadium of Anaheim Property Condition Assessment 3.20.2023 32 NAME: Washington Nationals Capital
Improvements Plan
LOCATION: Washington, D.C., USA
COMPLETION DATE: 2014
PROJECT DETAILS: - Site Development
- Structural (building structure,
canopies, ramps, stairs, etc.)
- Exterior Systems (roofs, walls,
windows, doors, etc.)
- Interior Systems (partitions,
flooring, casework, glazing, doors,
etc.);
- Fire Protection (pumps, piping,
valves, sprinkler heads, etc.);
- Conveying Systems (elevators,
escalators);
- Mechanical Systems (central
plant, HVAC systems, controls,
equipment, plumbing systems, gas
systems, fuel systems, etc.);
- Electrical Systems (electrical
power, equipment, lighting fixtures
and controls, field lighting, etc.);
- Stadium Seating;
- Furniture, Fixtures & Equipment
PROJECT TEAM: Brailsford & Dunlavey - Team Lead
Populous - Lead Architect
NAME: AT&T Park Capital Facility Assessment
(Now Oracle Park)
LOCATION: San Francisco, California, USA
COMPLETION DATE: 2010
PROJECT DETAILS: The 2011/2012 study examined the
following areas:
- Baseline Facility Assessment
- 10 Year Projected Capital
Improvements
- Capital Improvements Cash Flow
Analysis
- Master Plan Concepting
PROJECT TEAM: Populous (HOK Sport at the time)
Rutherford and Chekene – Structural
ME Engineers – MEP/IT
WJHW – AV/Scoreboard/Broadcast
Bigelow Companies – Food Service
Lerch Bates – Vertical Transportation
33 Known for its unique traditions and charm, Wrigley Field is an integral piece of the history and future of America’s pastime. To preserve its charm and ensure its viability for years to come, the team began a multi- year restoration and modernization project coined the 1060 Project in 2014. A part of the project included introducing game-changing premier experiences to Wrigley Field focused on four themes: tradition, beauty, charm and luxury.

The mission was for Wrigley Field to remain the best place to catch a baseball game and to keep its historic, majestic charm while also offering seats with prime views and access to an exclusive club and first-class amenities.

Each of Wrigley Field’s new ticketed premier clubs, including Maker’s Mark Barrel Room, American Airlines 1914 Club and the Catalina Club, offers a bar with premium drinks and exciting menu options, all in a climate-controlled space with private restrooms. Top-notch service and unrivaled amenities bind these clubs together. Unique personalities and distinct features set them apart.

PROJECT DETAILS:
- Project Cost:
$307 Million
PH 3&4
- Completion: 2019
- Awards:
2019 ENR Midwest
Best Project:

Renovation/
Restoration
CLIENT REFERENCE:

Chicago Cubs
Colin Faulkner
Sr. VP Sales and
Marketing
[email protected]
773-404-2927
“WHAT WE’VE DONE HERE
IS SPECTACULAR. I LOVE

THE CONCEPT OF TAKING

SOMETHING OLD AND

REBUILDING IT IN A WAY

THAT YOU STILL HAVE

THE VESTIGES OF WHAT IT

USED TO LOOK LIKE WITH

ALL THE AMENITIES OF
TODAY. THERE’S NOTHING
LIKE IT.”

JOE MADDON
Chicago Cubs General
Manager
Wrigley Field Renovations

CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, USA
SUITES

MAKERS MARK BARREL ROOM
AMERICAN AIRLINES 1914 CLUB

CATALINA CLUB

RECENT MLB BALLPARKS
Angel Stadium of Anaheim Property Condition Assessment 3.20.2023 34 Designed by Populous, the new home of
the Braves brings together a classic ballpark
feel, modern amenities, and southern
hospitality, creating a fan experience unlike
any other. An intimate setting of 41,149
was designed to maximize sightlines. The
ballpark features a three “deck” design with
the middle and upper decks cantilevered
over each lower deck to ensure all seats are
closer to the action. An extensive canopy –
approximately three times larger than most
ballparks – along with several indoor spaces
and clubs ensures the most comfortable
environment during any type of weather.

Wider concourses, most with direct views to
the field, has allowed easy access around
the ballpark to specialty food and beverage
areas.

The venue’s architecture pays tribute to the
natural environment while integrating into
the existing topography of the site, which
features a gently sloping terrain, allowing
the home plate side of the park to nestle into
the hillside.

The project is a first of its kind – a lifestyle
destination that will seamlessly integrate a
state-of-the-art baseball stadium with an
engaging multi-use community, creating
a vibrant atmosphere with unique shops,
restaurants and entertainment venues that
is accessible 365 days a year.

Truist Park

ATLANTA, GEORGIA, USA
PROJECT DETAILS:
- Seating Capacity: 41,149
- Completion: April 2017
- Suites: 10 Champions Suites,
22 Infinity Suites and 6 Party Suites
NOTEWORTHY:
- 2017 Best Projects: Sports/
Entertainment, ENR Southeast
- 2017 Project of the Year, ENR Southeast
- 2017 Ballpark of the Year,
BallparkDigest.com
- LEED Silver Certified
CLIENT REFERENCE:

Atlanta Braves
Eric Perestuk
Sr. VP Engineering
[email protected]
404-522-7630
“THIS IS THE MOST BEAUTIFUL MAJOR LEAGUE BALLPARK I’VE EVER SEEN.”

JOHN SCHUERHOLZ
Atlanta Braves President

RECENT MLB BALLPARKS
35 BOLSTERED BY 40 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE

DESIGNING BALLPARKS AND BASEBALL FACILITIES

ACROSS THE GLOBE, NO OTHER FIRM DRIVES
DESIGN INNOVATION LIKE POPULOUS.

MAJOR LEAGUE – 27 OF 30 BALLPARKS
Wrigley Field Improvements, Chicago, Illinois
T-Mobile Park Renovations, Seattle, Washington
Truist Park (formerly SunTrust), Cobb County,
Georgia
Marlins Park, Miami, Florida
Target Field, Minneapolis, Minnesota
Kauffman Stadium Renovation, Kansas City,
Missouri
Yankee Stadium, New York, New York
Citi Field, New York, New York
Progressive Field, Cleveland, Ohio
Comerica Park, Detriot, Michigan
Citizens Bank Park, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Great American Ball Park, Cincinnati, Ohio
Coors Field, Denver, Colorado
Nationals Park, Washington, D.C.

Busch Stadium, St. Louis, Missouri
PETCO Park, San Diego, California
PNC Park, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Minute Maid Park, Houston, Texas
Oracle Park, San Francisco, California
Globe Life Park Renovations
Angel Stadium of Anaheim, Anaheim, California
Fenway Park Improvements, Boston,
Massachusetts
Oriole Park at Camden Yards, Baltimore, Maryland
Guaranteed Rate Field, Chicago, Illinois
Tropicana Field, St. Petersburg, Florida

SPRING TRAINING FACILITIES
George M. Steinbrenner Field Enhancements
CenturyLink Sports Complex Renovation, Fort
Myers, Florida
Sloan Park, Mesa, Arizona
JetBlue Park, Fort Myers, Florida
Goodyear Spring Training Facility, Goodyear,
Arizona
Charlotte Sports Park, Port Charlotte, Florida
Surprise Recreation Campus, Surprise, Arizona
San Diego Padres Dominican Academy, San
Cristobal, Dominican Republic
Scottsdale Stadium, Scottsdale, Arizona
Dodgertown Renovation, Vero Beach, Florida
Bright House Field, Clearwater, Florida
Peoria Spring Training Facility, Peoria, Arizona
Jackie Robinson Stadium Study, Daytona Beach,
Florida
Kino Veteran Memorial Stadium, Tucson, Arizona,
Roger Dean Stadium, Jupiter, Florida
Phoenix Municipal Stadium Renovation Study,
Phoenix, Arizona
HoHokam Stadium and Fitch Park Player
Development Complex, Mesa, Arizona
Baltimore Orioles Spring Training Facility Master
Plan, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida
Tempe Diablo Stadium, Tempe, Arizona
City of Palms Park, Fort Myers, Florida
Homestead Sports Complex, Homestead, Florida
West Palm Beach Stadium Complex Master Plan,
West Palm Beach,
Florida
Ed Smith Sports Complex, Sarasota, Florida
Boardwalk & Baseball, Hanes City, Florida
Port St. Lucie Sports Complex, Port St. Lucie,
Florida

TARGET FIELD
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Angel Stadium of Anaheim Property Condition Assessment 3.20.2023 36 The Populous team has a successful track record delivering public assembly building designs of this magnitude. The major factors that create this successful track record of delivery success include:
- Firm experience with the building type
- Key design team member experience assembled for your project - Familiarity with each other
- Collaboration and teamwork mentality
- Technical expertise and depth of resources
Each of these statements lend credibility to our team’s overall ability to meet a schedule that will be defined as this project moves forward.

Successfully meeting and delivering schedules is foremost a function of having highly skilled and experienced individuals placed into key roles on a project. The Populous team assembled for your project includes individuals at all levels of design, production and management who were key leaders in the successful delivery of new, major stadium projects and significant renovations such as at your stadium. Successfully meeting schedules also requires having key team members fully dedicated to your project. Our team will be available, dedicated to your project and worked together on similar projects before. The internal resources our firm offers its employees and the wealth of knowledge we provide our clients and builder partners will be crucial in meeting challenges head on while offering unique perspectives.

Schedule adherence is an essential component to project success.

Integrating the requirements of the Project Manager and Team from the onset will aid in excellent decision making and establish the critical path for the project. Populous will work directly with the City of Anaheim and the Angels to create the roadmap in detail including package-based delivery approach and key milestones.

PROCESS
Utilize proven methodologies to conduct
our business efficiently and accurately.
- Budget, program and quality
alignment incrementally throughout
the project.
- Being sensitive to design and
constructibility issues. Designing
to simplify construction and enable
ef
ficient sequencing.
- Anticipating issues before problems
arise.

TEAMING
Great projects have great teams.
- Develop good relationships with all
team members based on mutual
trust and respect.
- Great communication and
coordination between all parties
focused on solving problems.
- Helping everyone succeed to create
successful outcomes.

RESPONSIBILITY
Every team member owns the project.
- Doing our job to design and
document the project to minimize
errors and omissions.
- Owning our responsibilities. Fixing
our mistakes.
- Performing as professionals.

Finally, and most important, our firm culture
and the individual team leaders proposed
for your project will listen, engage, and
foster a "project first" mentality that will
overcome challenges that help deliver and
meet schedules established alongside the
project team’s owner and builder.

Our philosophy in minimizing schedule
and budget issues include:

ABILITY TO MEET SCHEDULE

CLIMATE PLEDGE ARENA
Seattle, Washington
37 Low, Medium and High Priority Maintenance Items
Our teams proven method of cost estimating and
reporting procedures include these key steps,
evaluations and discussions before we report
anticipated costs to the client group. This cost
estimating procedure outline is tailored for the low,
medium and high priority repair items.

1. Assembly and organization of clear low, medium
and high priority maintenance items necessary
to keep the ballpark functional.

2. Vetting of repair or maintenance procedures and
selecting the best and most economical approach
to achieve the desired end result. This includes
discussions with City of Anaheim and Angels for
specific items.

3. Vetting if any existing or in place maintenance
programs or other capital expenditures can
capture these anticipated repair costs.

4. Utilize design and engineering consultants
experience with such repair items and their
opinion of probable cost.

5. Vet that cost opinion with KPRS for their
opinion, southern California local market cost
considerations and then if necessary, reaching
out to specific subcontractors in that field of repair
for their opinion of cost.

6. Present these anticipated costs to City of Anaheim
and Angels, if necessary, to gain concurrence
that the cost or cost estimate seems reasonable.
10 and 20 Capital Improvements Plan + Matrix
In a similar manner, the following cost estimating
procedure has been used with previous MLB capital
planning to ensure a plan that key stakeholders
believe it and can use for the foreseeable future.

1. Development of a capital planning matrix format
that is usable for the City of Anaheim and Angels.

2. Use of software that is easily accessible and
usable for the intended users.

3. Establish the 10 year capital plan matrix to a level of specificity that is more element based and
provide cost estimate budgets for each element.

4. Establish a 20 year capital plan matrix that is
more yearly budget driven by the results of the
10 year element matrix. This will give the City of
Anaheim the best budget forecasting tool possible
based on the solid data of the 10 year plan.

5. Review carefully each plan with the City of
Anaheim and make edits as necessary to finalize.

Understand that this is a living 10 and 20 year
plan that will need to be updated periodically.

FACILITY ASSESSMENT COST ESTIMATING

AND REPORTING PROCEDURES

T-MOBILE PARK
Seattle, Washington
Angel Stadium of Anaheim Property Condition Assessment 3.20.2023 38 Quality assurance is a comprehensive practice
that is deeply ingrained in our firm’s culture.

Hiring professionals committed to quality, promoting
high standards of excellence and creating a learning
environment focused on developing expertise all
contribute to a culture of delivering quality in every
aspect of what we do.

Project-specific quality assurance begins with
the project team understanding and embracing
the expectations in areas of cost, quality, scope
and schedule. This process requires anticipation,
cooperation, communication, coordination, flexibility
and action.

In order to have a successful project we need to
strike a balance between each of these aspects.

Quality assurance at Populous is completed by a
focused team of senior architects. The QA team
has weekly meetings to discuss issues encountered
on all projects within the office, lessons learned
during construction, design issues affecting project
documentation such as new requirements in the
model building codes (IBC, NFPA), ADA rulings,
and construction product successes or failures. A
member of the Quality assurance team is assigned
to each project to review the documents during each

QUALITY CONTROL/QUALITY ASSURANCE
design phase. QA team members provide additional
technical guidance to the project team, recommend
alternatives based on previous firm experiences
and provide a second, independent review of the
overall documentation quality. A list of comments is
provided to the project team for response and closure
and detailed review meetings occur to ensure that
any items identified are incorporated into the final
documents.

Quality control is handled by the project team. The
project team uses office standard stadia checklists
when reviewing the drawings to check completeness.

QA/QC Checklists are formatted so as to follow the
project through each phase. Proper uses of these
lists help ensure timely design decisions in a logical
sequence, and assist in completing a project efficiently.

These comprehensive checklists are a valuable tool in
minimizing omissions from the project. The checklists
consist of tasks and deliverables completed and/or
initiated during the appropriate phase of the project.

The project team uses the checklists as a reference
from the beginning of the project to check the
applicable items at the end of each phase. They also
include coordination items for structural, mechanical,
electrical, plumbing, civil, fire protection, low voltage, and other disciplines. Accessibility and sustainability measures are also examined.

WRIGLEY FIELD
Chicago, Illinois
39 02

SCOPE OF SERVICES
& SCHEDULE
Angel Stadium of Anaheim Property Condition Assessment 3.20.2023 40 APPROACH
Our approach to Angel Stadium facility assessment is
simple. Through visual review of existing conditions.

Open discussion with City of Anaheim and Angels
about the results found during the visual review
process and thoughtful, organized assessment
reporting, cost estimating and finally delivery of the
information that is easily consumable by all key
stakeholders. Our task by task outlines, in more detail, what we believe will be the steps necessary for this to be a successful process. This process will take team
work, clear communications and open dialog about
conditions for the results to be usable and believable
for all stakeholders.

WORK PLAN
Task 1: Attend kick off meeting at Angel Stadium
around May 1 timeframe (one day)
- Half day
listening session from the City of Anaheim
and Angels reps to discuss condition of ballpark.
- Get any maintenance reports or other information

on hand.
- Half
day break out session with maintenance staff
to review their areas of concentration.
- V
erbal report to larger group at end of day for
initial conditional assessment of systems.

Task 2: Three Day On-Site Conditional Review
(three days but concurrent with Task 1)
- Daily walking reviews of building/site systems

with or without City or Angels staff. Photograph
and document conditions.
- Daily verbal reporting to larger group of conditions

found at end of each day.
- Larger two hour wrap up session at end of three

days reviews on-site at ballpark whereby verbal
or visual reviews are shared with larger group.

NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION
Task 3: Draft Reporting (three weeks)
- Assemble photos of deficient items
- Narrative writing of deficient items and systems
- Note
deficiencies in low, medium and high priority
items
- Assemble
enough information of these deficient
items that they can be cost estimated by a GC.

Photos, narratives, sketches are acceptable
- Draft
10 and 20 year capital improvements
following Populous spreadsheet lead.
- Assemble enough information for these capital

improvements that they can be cost estimated by
GC. Providing your cost input for this effort is also
helpful and asked for.
- Provide a preliminary assessment opinion of

how Angel Stadium facility condition compares
to Kauffman and Dodger Stadiums and how that
opinion was determined.

Task 4: Preliminary Reporting to City of Anaheim
(one day meeting – one week timeframe total)
- On-site
meeting for one day to report and discuss
preliminary results to this point and receive
comments.
- Submit this preliminary report to Populous and

Populous assembles and submits to City of
Anaheim.

Task 5: Final Reporting (one week)
- Based on comments from the City of
Anaheim
and others, assemble report into final drafts and
submit to Populous.
- Populous
will format and have one last review
with consultant team and then submit final report
to the City of Anaheim.
- Final
report to provide definitive opinion of
condition of Angel Stadium as compared to
Kauffman and Dodger Stadiums as it relates to
Sections 10 and 22 of the Angel Stadium Lease
Task 6: Unforeseens (half time, two weeks)
- Add
two weeks of half time of staff for delays or
other items not accounted for at this moment.

SCOPE OF SERVICES
& SCHEDULE
41 CAPITAL EXPENSE PLANNING
The Populous team adopts a comprehensive
approach to Facility Capital Expense Planning,
drawing on our team's extensive experience in facility
operations and long-term capital expense program
planning and implementation. Our multi-step process
involves an initial analysis of existing maintenance
programs and logs, as well as maintenance expense
reports, to establish a baseline for developing a capital improvement program that takes into account existing
system conditions, as well as both functional and non-
functional obsolescence. This approach allows us to
tailor a capital program that is appropriately sized and adequately funded.

As part of our assessment, we scrutinize each
component individually while considering its function
in the context of the building's overall system. To this end, we will not recommend wasteful spending such
as replacing an item if it was recently replaced and
is in good working order and meets the future needs
and requirements of the facility, but rather focus on the long-term maintenance needs of each component.

Working in collaboration with our team industry expert
partners and specialists, we conduct a detailed
Facility Assessment to identify the current condition
of critical components such as infrastructure, MEP
systems, foodservice, technology, and others. Based
on our findings, we develop a 20-year maintenance
and replacement cost plan, with needs prioritized into
High, Medium, and Low categories, with client input
and feedback, to ensure urgent needs are highlighted.

We create a cost matrix in Microsoft Excel using
current market pricing and information from our cost
estimators and current actual costs realized on our
other projects taking place through North America. The
matrix includes appropriate soft costs such as design,
testing, permitting, insurance, bonding as well as an
appropriate amount of contingency and escalation to
ensure future funding allocation is adequate. The cost
matrix is designed to be easily updated by our clients
in the future, along with the ability to adjust based on scenarios that our clients wish to hypothesize as they
see fit.

WRIGLEY FIELD
Chicago, Illinois
Angel Stadium of Anaheim Property Condition Assessment 3.20.2023 42 KEY PROJECT

MILESTONES
APRIL
MAY
JUNE
JUNE 20, 2023

FINAL STUDY SUBMISSION
2023

NOTICE OF AWARD
Date: April 27, 2023
MEETING #2 (TASK 4)
Preliminary Reporting to City
of Anaheim
Date: May 30, 2023
MEETING #1 (TASKS 1 & 2)
Project Kick-Off/Listening Session
and Initial Ballpark Review
Date: May 1–4, 2023
MEETING #3 (TASK 6)
Final Reporting to City
of Anaheim
Date: June 20, 2023
43 03
FEE

PROPOSAL
Angel Stadium of Anaheim Property Condition Assessment 3.20.2023 44 2023 POPULOUS BILLING RATES
Senior Principal $450
Senior Architect - PIC $400
Senior Project Manager $340
Senior Project Architect $340
Senior Project Designer $340
Architect $200
Project Manager $230
Project Architect $230
Project Designer $230
Architecture Designer II $145
Architecture Designer I $130
Senior Graphic Designer $225
Graphic 3D Design Specialist $185
Graphic Designer $165
Graphic Designer II $135
Graphic Designer I $125
Computer Animation Specialist $245
Quality Coordinator $275
Specifications Writer $240
BIM Technician $145
Administrative Assistant $125
Intern $70

RATEJOB TITLERATEJOB TITLE
Senior Planner $390
Planner $260
Senior Landscape Architect $260
Landscape Architect $165
Landscape Designer II $125
Landscape Designer I $120
Senior Interior Designer $270
Interior Designer $185
Interior Designer III $170
Interior Designer II $150
Interior Designer I $110

RATEJOB TITLE
As requested, Appendix 5 Fee Proposal Form is provided on page 2.

Additionally, the following are the fees and costs for the proposed facility assessment as outlined in our Work Plan Tasks and time durations noted in our Schedule.

Professional Fees: $292,000 (Two hundred, ninety-two thousand dollars USD) Travel Expenses: $32,000 (Thirty-two thousand dollars USD) Printing and other Costs: $1,000 (One thousand dollars USD) Total Cost: $325,000 (Three hundred, twenty-five thousand dollars USD) Populous is excited about the opportunity to work at Angel Stadium once again. We are open to negotiating our fee as needed to complete this project.

HOURLY RATES
Please see below for our 2023 project staff hourly rates as well as the rates of the all the named firms on the following pages.

COST PROPOSAL
45 ME Engineers
Senior Principal $325
Principal $300
Associate Principal $280
Associate $245
Senior Project Manager $235
Project Manager $200
Project Engineer $175
Engineer $160
Designer $150
Sr. BIM Coordinator $140
BIM Coordinator $135
CAD Technician $125
Administrative Staff $120
Critical Structures
Principal $385
Senior Project Manager $275
Project Manager $235
Project Engineer $190
Senior Drafter / Revit $180
Senior Drafter / AutoCAD $160
Clerical $110
2023 CONSULTANT BILLING RATES

RATEJOB TITLE
Thornton Tomasetti
Managing Principal $505
Senior Principal $450
Senior VP / Principal $415
VP / Associate Principal $395
Senior Associate $335
Associate $320
Senior Project Engineer $285
Project Engineer $275
Sr. Engineer / Designer $240
Building Info. Modeler $215
Administrative Support $130
Salas O'Brien
Principal $275
Senior VP / VP $240
Associate VP $225
Senior Consultant $215
Consultant $180
Designer $150
Saddleback
Roof Review Staff $150
Fuscoe Engineering
3-Man Survey Crew $433
2-Man Survey Crew $315
1-Man Survey Crew $217
Principal / Sr. PM $250
Project Manager $220
Sr. Designer / Proj. Eng. $198
Designer / Engineer $175
Assoc. Engineer / CADD $145
Information Coordinator $100
KPRSEstimator $125
EWCG
Consultant (lump sum) $9,600

RATEJOB TITLE
Angel Stadium of Anaheim Property Condition Assessment 3.20.2023 46 TRUIST PARK
Atlanta, Georgia
47 04

EXAMPLE FACILITY

ASSESSMENT
Angel Stadium of Anaheim Property Condition Assessment 3.20.2023 48 V1.1
capital planning & masterplan

ENHANCING AN ICON
t-mobile park
VOLUME 01
1 SPRING 2019

v1.2
Welcome to
T-Mobile Park
Home to the Next Chapter
of Mariners Baseball
V1.3

v1.4

V1.5
April 30, 2019
T-Mobile Park is an unforgettable place. The ballpark is not only a celebrated icon within the sport of baseball; it also plays an important role as a symbol of Seattle. Baseball’s lasting influence upon the Emerald City is reflected in the building’s soaring green arcs that move assuredly over steady Northwest skies, permanently embedding the spirit of the game into a single, coherent gesture along the city’s unmistakable skyline.

By carefully combining contemporary and traditional elements, the ballpark pairs baseball’s nostalgic character with the energy of a contemporary and forward-thinking metropolis.

Friendly architectural expressions are captured in charming brick patterns while sculpturally dynamic forms pay heed to the character of the district’s industrial heritage. References to nearby waterfront docks and steel cranes are apparent in the nautical quality of the ballpark’s silhouette, while its interior spaces bring together eclectic experiences that respect local culinary and brewing traditions. Delicate green steel details frame bright and airy concourses; there is never a dull vista. The outdoor environment is faithfully respected within the ballpark, shedding light on the region’s optimal summer baseball weather. Pleasant breezes and the sounds of the city permeate its confines, inviting the feeling of Seattle to surround fans and players alike.

There is a universal appreciation for T-Mobile Park as an architectural gem, having been selected for inclusion on the AIA’s prestigious list of America’s Favorite Architecture. The honor acknowledges the select company of only 150 buildings nationwide, and T-Mobile Park is one of only two buildings in Seattle chosen by the public for the prize. The building’s sophisticated blend of technology and family-friendly features are an achievement. We believe – as a design team – that these unique characteristics of T-Mobile Park provide us with a fitting roadmap to approach the design of the next generation of this great ballpark.

We appreciate the opportunity to work with the Seattle Mariners in developing concepts that respect the rare qualities of T-Mobile Park while finding new ways to enhance them through careful architectural exploration. The efforts contained within this volume are a collection of united concepts that will reinforce the nature of the ballpark and usher it into a new era of profitability and fan engagement. We thank you for this exciting opportunity. t-mobile park 2.0
v1.6
Executive Summary
Background
In December 2018, the Seattle Mariners
(“Mariners”) engaged Populous and Brailsford
& Dunlavey (“B&D”) to provide ballpark master
planning and capital improvements planning
for T-Mobile Park (formerly Safeco Field). The
primary objective of the capital improvement
planning portion of the assignment was to assist
the Mariners in developing an annual plan and
budget for capital expenditures (“CapEx”) work in
the year 2020, and rolling 10-Year plan and budget
for future CapEx work as required by the Lease
and Operating Agreement with the Washington
State Major League Baseball Public Facilities
District (“PFD”). As part of this work, Populous
and B&D were tasked with reviewing and updating
portions of the previously prepared Safeco Field
Long-Term Capital Needs Assessment (“LTCNA”).

Baseline Improvements Analysis
The purpose of baseline improvement analysis
is to examine progress towards implementation
of CapEx work identified by the LTCNA during
the intervening years of 2017, 2018, and 2019 in
order to update and revise CapEx projections.

Based upon B&D’s review, overall CapEx work
activities were generally in alignment with the
LTCNA, however a limited number of activities
were performed out of sequence, either earlier
or later than originally planned. In addition, there
were some new activities performed that were
not contemplated in the LTCNA. The reasons
for differences between planned and actual
CapEx work vary, but in general may include the
following:
• Performance of unanticipated work primarily
resulting from new code and security
requirements, including ADA improvements,
additional metal detectors; changes to access
control system, and design of a new perimeter
bollard system
• Mariners’ staff were able to extend the useful
life of certain systems without adversely
impacting operations such as the replacement
of televisions, and certain food service
equipment
• Mariner’s staff identified a number of
improvements that required implementation
sooner than originally planned, including
improvements to the kids area, roof runway
truss repair, playing field systems, elevators,
and interior finishes
• Lastly, replacement of the sound
reinforcement system, and video production
system were deferred due to the sizable cost
and at the time still unknown outcome of lease
renewal discussions. However, the Mariners
did proceed with design and procurement
planning for these systems to facilitate near-
term implementation.

In summary, while CapEx work activities performed
during the referenced years did not completely
align with LTCNA projections, the improvements
that were made enabled the Mariners to continue
operating the ballpark in a first-class manner.

Facility Assessment
Populous and B&D together with specialty
subconsultants (collectively the “Consulting
Team”) met with the Mariners in December 2018
to gain an understanding of existing conditions
at T-Mobile Park. The conditions were observed
over a three-day period and included interviews
with Mariners Staff and tours of the ballpark.

Information developed during the assessment has
been utilized to help inform the revised capital
improvement plan.

V1.7
A. Necessary Improvements
The necessary improvements delineated in
the LTCNA are still valid. The Consulting Team
recommends the addition of the following items.
• Architectural – Add perimeter physical barrier
along the exterior of the ballpark, consisting
of bollards, planters, and benches along the
sidewalk to protect guest and pedestrians in
compliance with the National Safety Act and as
permitted by the City of Seattle.
• Retractable Roof – Add life safety and electrical
infrastructure to accommodate the roof
accent lighting project.
• General Renewal and Replacement – Add
allowances to accommodate unknown
replacements consistent with the LTCNA, but
were not previously included (Interior, Team
Facilities, Food Service, Mechanical, Electrical,
and Plumbing).
• Technology – Move replacement of menu
boards from Food Service to Technology and
specify menu boards as digital in order to
interface with the point of sale system.

B. Upgrade Improvements
The Master Planning process identified a number
of recommended upgrade improvements, which
are focused on enhancing the fan experience.
• Lookout Landing – Convert a portion of the
concourse in left field on the 300 Level to
provide a party deck with views to downtown,
seating, lighting, televisions, and food &
beverage offerings
• Roof top Rotunda – Convert a portion of the
concourse behind home plate on the 300 Level
to provide a destination within the ballpark
with improved views to the Puget Sound,
family activities, seating, lighting, televisions
and audio-visual elements, and food &
beverage offerings.
• Gate Expansion – Reconfigure a portion of
the gate area at the left field entrance to
provide new gates and relieve ingress/egress
congestion, and to provide additional food &
beverage offerings.
• Edgar’s Corner Patio – Reconfigure a portion
of concourse and seating bowl in left field
on the 100 Level to relieve congestion and
to provide new loge box seats and renovate
existing concession area.
• Terrance Club Seating Modifications –
Reconfigure portions of the Terrace Club to
provide a variety of market-responsive seating
options, including “4 Topp” tables and lounge
boxes.

The Consulting Team believes that the T-Mobile
Park is generally in very good condition for its
age, and that the Mariners have maintained the
facility in a first-class manner. However, as noted
in the LTCNA there remain a number of spaces
and systems that will require replacement in the
near-term.
v1.8
Annual Plan (2020)
The Consulting Team in collaboration with the
Mariners have developed an Annual Plan to include
anticipated CapEx work for the year 2020, which
is detailed in the attached Exhibit. The total cost
of the plan, including necessary and upgrade
improvements is $34.4MM inclusive of a 15%
contingency.

1. Necessary Improvements
The plan includes approximately 60 individual
improvements, which are assigned categories
consistent with the LTCNA and references are
provided if applicable, a brief item description is
provided along with a determination with regard
to eligibility of the improvement for County
Tax Revenue funding, life cycle and phasing
information are provided, and estimated costs are
presented in 2019 dollars without inflation. The
budgeted cost of the necessary improvements in
the plan is $18.5MM inclusive of a 15% contingency.

The plan includes an alternate to implement the
perimeter physical barrier noted above, however,
implementation of the project is currently on hold
pending City approvals. If the alternate work is
included, the total estimated cost of the plan is
$25.2MM.

2. Upgrade Improvements
The plan includes 5 individual improvements,
consisting of the Lookout Landing, Rooftop
Rotunda, Gate Expansion, Edgar’s Corner
Patio, and Terrance Club seating modifications
noted above. The budgeted cost of upgrade
improvements in the plan is $9.2MM.

Rolling 10-Year Plan (2020 through 2029)
The Consulting Team in collaboration with the
Mariners have developed a rolling 10-year plan to
include anticipated CapEx work for the years 2020
through 2029, which is detailed in the attached
Exhibit. The total cost of the plan, including
necessary and upgrade improvements is $278.7MM
inclusive of 3% inflation compounded annually and
a 15% contingency.

1. Necessary Improvements
The plan includes approximately 597 individual
improvements, which are summarized in the
attached exhibit. Individual improvements are
summarized into categories consistent with
the LTCNA with estimated costs presented
in 2019 dollars, and annual costs for inflation
and contingency provided below the line. The
budgeted cost of necessary improvements in
the plan is $172.5MM inclusive of inflation and
contingency.

2. Upgrade Improvements
Due to the preliminary nature of the master
planning effort, the Rolling 10-Year Plan currently
includes the 5 individual improvements, with a to-
be-determined number of individual improvements
for the remainder of the plan. However, the total
budgeted cost includes assumptions for additional
upgrade improvements. The budgeted cost of
upgrade improvements in the plan is $106.2MM
inclusive of inflation and contingency.

Executive Summary
V1.9
Milestones
• A ugust 6th, 2018 - Notice of Award
• T uesday, December 18th, 2018 - Project kick-off, listening session, and initial ballpark review • W ednesday, January 16th, 2019 - Masterplan review #1 with Mariners staff • W ednesday, January 30th, 2019 - Masterplan review #2 and capital improvement plan review with Mariners staff
• W ednesday, March 6th, 2019 - Masterplan review #3 and capital improvement plan review with Mariners staff
• W eek of March 25th, 2019 - Masterplan and capital improvement plan presentations with Mariners o wnership
Economic Summary
• Nec essary expenditures in the proposed capital plan through the 25 year lease term total $366,000,000.
• Appr oximately $172,000,000 of necessary expenditures are included in the initial 10 year capital plan. This total includes inflation and contingency. • Pr ojected funding over the 25 year lease term totals $477,000,000, from both the county and capital expenditure funds.
• Pr ojected cost of scheduled upgrade improvements through 2023 totals $106,000,000. • In c ertain years, expenditures exceed funding, which will require financing until the PFD funds accrue.

Next Steps
• C onduct a yearly review of capital spending and execute the formation of a 1 and 10 year capital planning document, to be submitted to the PFD.
• Initiat e 2020 upgrade projects.
• As sess and plan for proposed future upgrade projects through 2023 and beyond. • C ontinue to monitor and evaluate any changes or developments within the vicinity of the ballpark for future revenue generating opportunities.
v1.10

MASTERPLAN TIMETABLE
General Summary
• F ollowing a period of initial conversations with Mariners staff pertaining to desired programmatic functions, the design team began an immersive process of familiarization with the ballpark’s existing conditions via drawing, research, and site visits. • Shor tly thereafter, Populous engaged in a series of exercises resulting in the generation of ar chitectural concepts providing a mix of upgrades to existing assets in the form of:
-Fan Enhancements
-Improved Seating
-Enhanc ed Operational Efficiencies
- Creation of Fan Amenities
- Alleviation of Distressed Inventory
- General Revenue Opportunities
• Aft er a sequence of additional design refinements based on client feedback, Skanska C onstruction was engaged to provide initial pricing estimates corresponding to stages of pr eliminary concept modeling.
• Pricing estimat es were further refined by a series of budgetary discussions amongst the design t eam, Skanska, and Mariners staff.
• As a r esult of budgetary analysis and pressing organizational needs, 10 masterplan concepts w ere selected from a total of 26 to interface collectively in a 4-year construction plan and thus designat ed “Timeline Projects.”
V1.11
District Studies
• P opulous consequently engaged in supplementary master planning studies associated with modifications t o the existing T-Mobile Park parking structure. These studies pertained to the inc orporation of a new rooftop concert venue, potential front office relocation, and various methods t o obtain increases in parking capacity • F urther district studies expanded to the real estate potential offered by the existing unde veloped lot opposite the Home Plate Rotunda. Improvements included considerations for a ne w hotel, entertainment destinations, meeting spaces, and generous outdoor amenities.
• Finally , Populous worked in collaboration with Ryan Durkan and her team of HCMP Law Offic es to determine potential large-scale development opportunities offered by the greater SoDo District and c onsistent with general zoning strategies. Optimal zoning conditions were identified and c onsidered in reference to a wide array of improvements suggested for the gr eater district.
v1.12
contents
VOLUME 1: enhancing an icon
PG. 14-21
PG. 22-35
PG. 36-43
Capital Planning Overview
Year-by-Year Plan
Multi-Year Funding Analysis
PG. 6-31
PG. 32-57
PG. 58-63
PG. 64-73
Masterplan Projects Overview
Year-by-Year Upgrade Projects
Supplemental Projects
Concert Hall & Amphitheater
Mixed-Use Development District
Parking Structure Annex / Expansion
Transit Improvements
VOLUME 2: ballpark, reimagined
VOLUME 3: ENERGIZING THE DISTRICT
PG. 4-11
PG. 12-177
PG. 178-241
V1.13
“I have a little project.”
EAGLE HARDWARE AND GARDEN COMMERCIAL, 1996

EDGAR MARTINEZ
DH / THIRD BASEMAN (1987-2004), MARINER LEGEND, AND HALL OF FAME INDUCTEE - CLASS OF 2019

v1.14
VOLUME 1:

Enhancing an Icon

V1.15

v1.16
Capital Planning

OVERVIEW
Update 2016 Long-Term Capital Needs Assessment to align with Lease Renewal:
• Capital Plan for Lease term - 25 Year Plan
• 10-year Rolling Plan (submit to PFD)
• 1-year Plan for 2020 (submit to PFD)
Process:
• Review of previous capital spending
• Facility assessment and interviews with Mariners
• Working sessions with Mariners refine findings
Proposed Capital Plan:
• Similar format as previous report in order to help PDF make connections
• Includes same cost inflation over time (3%) and contingency (15%) as previous report
• Divide into “Necessary” and “Upgrade” capital needs
• Includes funding analysis

V1.17
Previous Report
v1.18
Capital Planning

PRIMARY ASSESSMENT FINDINGS
The ballpark has been operated and maintained in a first- class manner
Some major building systems nearing or exceeding the end of useful economic life and require near-term replacement:
• Sound reinforcement system
• Point of sale system
• Lighting control system
• Ongoing bogie wheel replacement
A significant increase in annual investment over historic levels will be required to maintain the facility in a first class condition and meet Applicable Standard.

V1.19

v1.20
Capital Planning
25 year plan
necessary capital only

V1.21
Capital Planning
25 year plan
necessary capital only
Necessary expenditures in Proposed Capital Plan:
$366MM vs. $347MM in previous plan
v1.22
Capital Planning
10 year plan
summary

V1.23
Capital Planning
10 year plan
summary
10Year Plan:

Approximately $172MM, including inflation and contingency.

First 5 years represent $104MM of the total $172MM
investment over 10 years.

v1.24
Capital Planning
YEAR 1
(2020)

V1.25
Capital Planning
YEAR 1
(2020)

v1.26
Capital Planning
YEAR 2
(2021)

V1.27
Capital Planning
YEAR 2
(2021)

v1.28
Capital Planning
YEAR 3
(2022)

V1.29
Capital Planning
YEAR 3
(2022)

v1.30
Capital Planning
YEAR 4
(2023)

V1.31
Capital Planning
YEAR 4
(2023)

v1.32
Capital Planning
YEAR 5
(2024)

V1.33
Capital Planning
YEAR 5
(2024)

v1.34
Masterplan Projects
2020
2021
Terrace Club Seating Modifications
Lookout Landing
Rotunda Roof Deck Phase 01
Edgar’s Gate Line Extension & Corner Patio
$1,431,000*
$2,257,000*
$2,475,000*
$3,080,000*
$13,200,000
$12,930,000
Family Zone - Playground and Teen Area
Centerfield Terraces and ‘Pen Upgrades
V1.35
Masterplan Projects
2020 2022
2021 2023
$16,295,000
$14,520,000
$18,500,000
$3,900,000
Diamond Club + Street Front
Press Club
Writing Press Relocation
Hall of Fame & Main Concourse Food Hall
*Project costs include 25% hard costs and 25% soft costs all other Project costs include 25% hard costs only
v1.36
Capital Planning

FUNDING ANALYSIS
Projected funding over lease term:
$477MM (County + CapEx funds)
• Cost of Necessary Capital: $366MM
• Cost of Upgrades: $106MM
Total cost of Necessary Capital + Upgrades:
$472MM
In certain years, Expenditures exceed Funding, which will require financing until PFD funds accrue.

V1.37
Capital Planning

v1.38
Capital Planning

CASH FLOW
(NECESSARY ONLY)

V1.39
Capital Planning

CASH FLOW
(NECESSARY ONLY)
Available Funding:
$477MM vs. $366MM in Necessary expenditures over the
Lease term, resulting in approximately $111MM of funding capacity before applying any upgrades.

v1.40
T-Mobile Park 2.0
decision support basis
revenue projects
• Strong ROI / Revenue contribution to other projects
• Re-purpose of under performing space
• Revenue diversification
• Meet or exceed applicable standard
• Attract new target markets
• Ballpark refreshment / new offerings
• Capture some capital planning costs
V1.41
T-Mobile Park 2.0
decision support basis
revenue projects
• Strong ROI / Revenue contribution to other projects
• Re-purpose of under performing space
• Revenue diversification
• Meet or exceed applicable standard
• Attract new target markets
• Ballpark refreshment / new offerings
• Capture some capital planning costs
non-revenue projects
• Fan enhancements
Improved F&B experience
New or improved seating and viewing experience
Break linear seating rows / diversify ballpark experience • Operational efficiencies
• Create new fan amenity in distressed inventory
• Meet or exceed applicable standard
• Attract new target markets
• Ballpark refreshment / new offerings
• Capture some capital planning costs
v1.42
T-Mobile Park 2.0

COST AND REVENUE MODELING

MASTERPLAN PROJECT ESTIMATING
• Hard construction costs
• Contractor indirect costs
• Contingency
15% Design
10% Construction
25% Total
• No WSST (10.1%)
• No development soft costs
economics model estimate
• Revenue and expense escalation - 3.25%
• WSST - 10.1%
• Sponsorship inflation - 1.5%
• Project soft cost - 15%
v1.44

V1.45

v1.46

V2.1
capital planning & masterplan

BALLPARK, REIMAGINED
t-mobile park
VOLUME 02
1 SPRING 2019

V2.2
contents
VOLUME 1: enhancing an icon
Capital Planning Overview
Year-by-Year Plan
Multi-Year Funding Analysis
PG. 4-11
PG. 12-177
PG. 178-241
PG. 6-31
PG. 32-57
PG. 58-63
PG. 64-73
Masterplan Projects Overview
Year-by-Year Upgrade Projects
Supplemental Projects
Concert Hall & Amphitheater
Mixed-Use Development District
Parking Structure Annex / Expansion
Transit Improvements
VOLUME 2: ballpark, reimagined
VOLUME 3: ENERGIZING THE DISTRICT
PG. 14-21
PG. 22-35
PG. 36-43
V2.3
“I have a little project.”
EAGLE HARDWARE AND GARDEN COMMERCIAL, 1996

EDGAR MARTINEZ
DH / THIRD BASEMAN (1987-2004), MARINER LEGEND, AND HALL OF FAME INDUCTEE - CLASS OF 2019

V2.4
VOLUME 2:

Ballpark, Reimagined

V2.5

V2.6
Masterplan Projects
Complete Review of Ballpark, Perimeter Surroundings, and Transportation Nodes
2020
2021
2022
2023
• T errace Club Seating Modifications
•
L
ookout Landing
•
R
otunda Roof Deck
•
E
dgar’s Gate Line Extension & Corner Patio
•
F
amily Zone - Playground and Teen Area
•
C
enterfield Terraces and ‘Pen Upgrades
•
Diamond Club + Str
eet Front
•
Pr
ess Club
•
W
riting Press Relocation
•
Hall of F
ame & Main Concourse Food Hall
V2.7
Masterplan Projects
Complete Review of Ballpark, Perimeter Surroundings, and Transportation Nodes
• Hit it Her e Cafe
•
Sc
oreboard Bar
•
Club L
evel Renovation
•
Suit
e Level Renovation
•
Mariner Offic
e Shell Space
•
L
ookout Landing Treehouse
•
L
eft Field Gate Event Space
•
F
ield Access Tunnel Expansion
•
Ne
w Gate & Pedestrian Bridge Expansion
•
T
-Mobile Park Dugout Shift
•
F
ounders / Charter Seat Addition
Supplemental Project List
V2.8
Masterplan Projects

OVERVIEW
EXISTING CONDITIONS - 2019

V2.9

PROPOSED CONDITIONS
Scoreboard Bar
Hit it Here Cafe
New entry gate
and pedestrian
bridge
Family Zone
Edgar’s Corner
Lookout
Landing
Centerfield Terraces
Event space
Rotunda Roofdeck
V2.10
Masterplan Projects

OVERVIEW
EXISTING CONDITIONS - 2019

V2.11

PROPOSED CONDITIONS
Rotunda Roofdeck
Lower Press Club
3rd Base Club Seats
1st Base Club Seats
Diamond Club
Edgar’s Corner
Lookout
Landing
Centerfield Terraces
Event
Space
New entry gate and
pedestrian bridge
Hit it Here Cafe
Family Zone
V2.12
Masterplan Projects
Complete Review of Ballpark, Perimeter Surroundings, and Transportation Nodes
2020
2021
2022
2023
• Terrace Club Seating Modifications
• Lookout Landing
• Rotunda Roof Deck Phase 01
• Edgar’s Corner
• Family Zone - Playground and Teen Area
• Centerfield Terraces and ‘Pen Upgrades
• Diamond Club + Street Front
• Press Club
• Writing Press Relocation
• Hall of Fame & Main Concourse Food Hall
• Rotunda Roof Deck Phase 02
• Terrace Club Seating Modifications
• Lookout Landing
• Rotunda Roof Deck Phase 01
• Edgar’s Gate Line Extension & Corner Patio
Masterplan Projects
2020
V2.13
Masterplan Projects
Complete Review of Ballpark, Perimeter Surroundings, and Transportation Nodes
Masterplan Projects
2020

V2.14
2020
Terrace Club Seating
Modifications
project summary
- Install ne w seating options in the
terrace club
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024

OPENING DAY
V2.16
terrace club seating modifications
existing
2020
V2.17

CLUB LEVEL
V2.18
terrace club seating modifications
PROPOSED - 4 TOPP TABLES
2020
4 Topp tables
4 Topp tables
V2.19

CLUB LEVEL

PROJECT DATA
-780
n/a
+4,200
$1,431,000
Seats (+/-)
SRO (+/-)
Gross SF
Est. Cost
• 5 4 “4 Topp” tables
- 4 people per table
- 216 seats shown
•
12 lounge bo
xes
- 8 people per box
- 96 seats shown
•
1092 club seats r
emoved,
replaced by 312 premium
seating types

2.4 years
$25,700,000
$1,059,000 +
Payback Period
Net ROI
Net New Rev.

V2.20
terrace club seating modifications

PROPOSED - LOUNGE SEATS
2020
Lounge seats
Lounge seats
V2.21

CLUB LEVEL

PROJECT DATA
Seats (+/-)
SRO (+/-)
Gross SF
Est. Cost
• 5 4 “4 Topp” tables
- 4 people per table
- 216 seats shown
•
12 lounge bo
xes
- 8 people per box
- 96 seats shown
•
1092 club seats r
emoved,
replaced by 312 premium
seating types

4.6 years
$9,200,000
$424,000 +
Payback Period
Net ROI
Net New Rev.
-780
n/a
+4,200
$1,431,000
V2.22

V2.23

VIEW OF TERRACE CLUB
New seating options.

TERRACE CLUB SEATING MODIFICATIONS
V2.24
2020
Lookout Landing
project summary
- Amplify the Lookout Landing experience
with minor modifications
- Cr
eate backyard atmosphere with trellis

element, T
Vs, lounge furniture, and

fest
oon lighting
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024

OPENING DAY
V2.26

LOOKOUT LANDING
existing
2020
V2.27
UPPER Concourse
V2.28

PROPOSED
2020

LOOKOUT LANDING
Existing bar removed
Relocated bar
Glass windbreak
Lighting and trellis above
New TVs
New lounge furniture
V2.29

PROJECT DATA
+18
+0
+2,026
$2,257,000
Seats (+/-)
SRO (+/-)
Gross SF
Est. Cost
• R enovated outdoor space
than can be used for a
variety of baseball and non-
baseball events throughout
the year
•
L
ounge experiences and
great views to the game,
the city, the Sound, and the
mountains
•
Similar finish t
o Xfinity
Rooftop in Atlanta at
SunTrust Park

7.8 years
$3,300,000
$186,000 +
Payback Period
Net ROI
Net New Rev.

UPPER Concourse
V2.30

V2.31

VIEW OF LOOKOUT LANDING
Creating backyard atmosphere with minor modifications.

LOOKOUT LANDING
V2.32
2020
Rotunda Roof Deck
project summary
- Create raised rotunda roof deck with
great views
- Provide additional F&B points of sale
- Provide destination for upper concourse
patrons
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024

OPENING DAY
V2.34

ROTUNDA ROOF DECK
existing
2020
V2.35
UPPER Concourse
V2.36

PROPOSED
2020

ROTUNDA ROOF DECK
Portables F&B carts / 8 P.O.S.

Media mesh or similar LED outdoor screens
Raised deck at perimeter and rotunda / 2500 SF
Integrated bench and drinkrail
Relocated kids batting / pitching tunnels
(Temporary)
Reuse existing picnic tables
V2.37

PROJECT DATA
n/a
n/a
+2,500
$2,475,000
Seats (+/-)
SRO (+/-)
Gross SF
Est. Cost
• Cr eate new raised rotunda
roof deck for great views to
Puget Sound and a unique
experience accessible to
upper bowl fans
•
Pr
ovide family seating and
adult seating zones
•
R
elocate kids batting and
pitching tunnels temporarily
•
Amplify spac
e with large-
scale LED outdoor screen to
connect fans to game
•
Sponsor Int
egration:

A partner who values
environmental sustainability
UPPER Concourse

V2.38

V2.39

VIEW OF ROTUNDA ROOF DECK
A unique experience accessible to upper bowl fans.

ROTUNDA ROOF DECK
V2.40

V2.41

ROTUNDA ROOF DECK

VIEW OF ROTUNDA ROOF DECK
Offers panoramic views to Puget Sound and beyond.

V2.42

V2.43

ROTUNDA ROOF DECK

VIEW OF ROTUNDA ROOF DECK
Provides seating options for adults and families.

V2.44

V2.45

ROTUNDA ROOF DECK

VIEW OF ROTUNDA ROOF DECK
Large-scale LED outdoor screen to connect fans to game.

V2.46
2020
Edgar’s Gate Line
Extension &
Corner Patio
project summary
- Relieves major congestion both within
the ballpark and on the perimeter
- Adds new entrance gates
- Adds new seating types
- Creates more advertising space
- Increases functional length of The ‘Pen
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024

OPENING DAY
V2.48
EDGAR’S GATE LINE EXTENSION
existing
2020
V2.49

FIELD LEVEL

V2.50

PROPOSED
2020
Expand existing gate line (16 new gates)
to encompass new circulation to The Pen
EDGAR’S GATE LINE EXTENSION
V2.51

PROJECT DATA
n/a
n/a
+4,500
$1,500,000
Seats (+/-)
SRO (+/-)
Gross SF
Est. Cost
field level
• Expanded gat e line
•
Incr
eased functional length
of The ‘Pen
•
R
elocated box office,
replaced with new
restrooms and retail
Relocated box office
New retail
New restroom
V2.52

V2.53
VIEW OF EDGAR’S GATE LINE EXTENSION
Reconfigured entry experience.

EDGAR’S GATE LINE EXTENSION
V2.54

V2.55
VIEW OF EDGAR’S GATE LINE EXTENSION
Reconfigured entry experience.

EDGAR’S GATE LINE EXTENSION
V2.56
EDGAR’S corner patio
existing
2020
V2.57
main concourse

V2.58

PROPOSED
2020
EDGAR’S corner patio
Deck over existing treads,
new linear drink rail seats
Branding / advertising
opportunity along new walls
Significant increase
in circulation width
V2.59

PROJECT DATA
-625
+75
+4,500
$1,580,000
Seats (+/-)
SRO (+/-)
Gross SF
Est. Cost
main concourse
• 800 seats r emoved, replaced
by 175 premium drinkrail
seats
•
R
enovated concession area
•
Ne
w patio areas with views
to the field
•
Incr
eased concourse width
to reduce congestion
•
R
euse of existing stair
to relieve concourse
congestion

V2.60

V2.61
EDGAR’S CORNER PATIO
VIEW OF EDGAR’S CORNER PATIO
New patio areas with views to the field.

V2.62

PROPOSED
2020
EDGAR’S CORNER pen extension
Expand existing gate
line (16 new gates) to
encompass new circulation
to The ‘Pen
Relocated box office
New retail
New restrooms
V2.63

FUTURE PHASE SUMMARY

FIELD LEVEL
New restrooms
• R enovated concession area
•
Ne
w patio areas with views
to the field
•
Incr
eased concourse width
to reduce congestion
•
R
euse of existing stair
to relieve concourse
congestion
Enlarged storage
V2.64
2021
Masterplan Projects
• Family Zone - Playground and Teen Area
• Centerfield Terraces and ‘Pen Upgrades
V2.65
2021
Masterplan Projects
V2.66
2021
Family Zone -
Playground and
Teen Area
project summary
- A ne w field-facing family zone accessed
by the upper concourse
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024

OPENING DAY
V2.68

LOOK & FEEL
2021

FAMILY ZONE - PLAYGROUND

V2.69

SPONSOR INTEGRATION

UPPER CONCOURSE
• Childr en’s health or outdoor
equipment partner
•
Baseball activities themed

as an adventure camp
embracing spirit of the
Pacific Northwest
•
Cr
eates experiences for
kids to connect with the
Mariners’ story and the
Mariner Moose
•
F
&B lounge areas themed
to incorporate outdoor
equipment sponsor
•
A unique seating section

dedicated to parents

V2.70
existing
2021

FAMILY ZONE - PLAYGROUND
Remove top ten rows of precast bowl
Remove all seats inside dashed line (925 seats)
Existing sunshade, to remain
V2.71

UPPER CONCOURSE
V2.72
2021

FAMILY ZONE - PLAYGROUND

PROPOSED
New deck / 4500 SF
Batting and Pitching Cages
Integrated Parent Seating Section
Mariner Moose Den
New themed playground equipment
V2.73

UPPER CONCOURSE

PROJECT DATA
-925
+175
+5,550
$9,460,000
Seats (+/-)
SRO (+/-)
Gross SF
Est. Cost
• Int egrated baseball elements
for children to familiarize
with rules of the game and
experience the athleticism
of in-game situations
•
Mix of tr
aditional and
contemporary playground
equipment with Pacific
Northwest theming and
substantial baseball
integration
V2.74

V2.75

VIEW OF THE FAMILY ZONE PLAYGROUND
With a unique seating section dedicated specifically to parents.

FAMILY ZONE - PLAYGROUND
V2.76

V2.77

VIEW OF THE FAMILY ZONE PLAYGROUND
A mix of traditional and contemporary playground equipment with Northwest theming.

FAMILY ZONE - PLAYGROUND
V2.78
existing
2021

FAMILY ZONE - TEEN AREA
Remove existing
concession stand
V2.79

UPPER CONCOURSE
V2.80
2021

FAMILY ZONE - TEEN AREA

PROPOSED
Exhibit Space “B” / 3000 SF
Exhibit Space “A” / 350 SF
V2.81

UPPER CONCOURSE
Exhibit Space “C” / 550 SF

PROJECT DATA
n/a
n/a
+3,900
$3,740,000
Seats (+/-)
SRO (+/-)
Gross SF
Est. Cost
• Exhibit spac es on existing
concourse floor slab
•
Sponsor Int
egration:

A technology partner to
establish connections
between historic moments in
Seattle baseball history with
future product offerings

V2.82
2021
Centerfield Terraces
and ‘Pen Upgrades
project summary
- Cr eate a signature and highly-visible
outfield element catering to diverse fan
experiences
- Establish a destination hospitality space
- Regularize outfield geometries
- Adds additional front row standing room
- Builds new permanent bathrooms for
The ‘Pen
- Increases back-of-house storage space
- Enhances street presence for The ‘Pen

and C
enterfield Gate
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024

OPENING DAY
V2.84
existing
2021
CENTERFIELD TERRACES AND ‘PEN UPGRADES

V2.85

BLEACHERS

V2.86
2021
CENTERFIELD TERRACES AND ‘PEN UPGRADES

PROPOSED
V2.87

BLEACHERS

PROJECT DATA
n/a
+144
+25,000
$12,930,000
Seats (+/-)
SRO (+/-)
Gross SF
Est. Cost
• Cr eates a signature and
highly-visible outfield
element
•
4 le
vels of new amenities
•
R
egularizes outfield
geometries
•
300 linear feet of standing
-
room-only drink rail
V2.88
2021
CENTERFIELD TERRACES AND ‘PEN UPGRADES

PROPOSED
V2.89

BLEACHERS

LOOK & FEEL
2021
CENTERFIELD TERRACES AND ‘PEN UPGRADES

V2.91

SPONSOR INTEGRATION
• St ory focused on the iconic
roof of the ballpark
•
Suppor
ted by beer or spirit
sponsor
•
Bar
Name Options:

Wheels & Axles Drafts
Axles & Ales
Moonshot Bar

BLEACHERS

V2.92
existing
2021
CENTERFIELD TERRACES AND ‘PEN UPGRADES
V2.93

FIELD LEVEL
V2.94
2021
CENTERFIELD TERRACES AND ‘PEN UPGRADES

PROPOSED
V2.95

FIELD LEVEL

PROJECT DATA
n/a
+144
+25,000
$12,930,000
Seats (+/-)
SRO (+/-)
Gross SF
Est. Cost
New floor finish
New restrooms
Existing storage
room expanded
• Cr eates a signature and
highly-visible outfield
element
•
4 le
vels of new amenities
•
R
egularizes outfield
geometries
•
300 linear feet of standing
-
room-only drink rail
V2.96

V2.97
VIEW OF THE UPDATED ‘PEN ENTRANCE
Enhanced street presence at Centerfield Gate.

CENTERFIELD TERRACES AND ‘PEN UPGRADES
V2.98

V2.99
VIEW OF THE UPDATED ‘PEN ENTRANCE
Enhanced street presence at Centerfield Gate with amenity space above.

CENTERFIELD TERRACES AND ‘PEN UPGRADES
V2.100
existing
2021
CENTERFIELD TERRACES AND ‘PEN UPGRADES
V2.101

MAIN CONCOURSE
V2.102
2021
CENTERFIELD TERRACES AND ‘PEN UPGRADES

PROPOSED
Food prep station
New SRO
terraces with
drink rails
Concession (8 P.O.S)
Keg coolerStairs to The Pen
Stairs to Bleachers
Stairs to Bleachers
Retail
V2.103

MAIN CONCOURSE

PROJECT DATA
n/a
+144
+25,000
$12,930,000
Seats (+/-)
SRO (+/-)
Gross SF
Est. Cost
• Cr eates a signature and
highly-visible outfield
element
•
4 le
vels of new amenities
•
R
egularizes outfield
geometries
•
300 linear feet of standing
-
room-only drink rail
New storage room
New restrooms
Keg cooler
Cabanas
Self serve craft beer station
V2.104

V2.105

VIEW OF HOSPITALITY SPACE ON MAIN CONCOURSE
Destination social spaces catering to diverse fan experiences.

CENTERFIELD TERRACES AND ‘PEN UPGRADES
V2.106
existing
2021
CENTERFIELD TERRACES AND ‘PEN UPGRADES
V2.107

BLEACHERS
V2.108
2021
CENTERFIELD TERRACES AND ‘PEN UPGRADES

PROPOSED
New Bar (8 P.O.S)
Stairs to Main Concourse
Stairs to Main Concourse
New concrete slab
V2.109

BLEACHERS

V2.111

HIGHLY VISIBLE SOCIAL DESTINATIONS
Bridging current outfield bleacher sections.

CENTERFIELD TERRACES AND ‘PEN UPGRADES
V2.112

V2.113

HIGHLY VISIBLE SOCIAL DESTINATIONS
Bridging current outfield bleacher sections.

CENTERFIELD TERRACES AND ‘PEN UPGRADES
V2.114
Masterplan Projects
2022
• Diamond Club & Street Front
• Press Club
• Writing Press Relocation
V2.115
Masterplan Projects
2022
V2.116
2022
Diamond Club &
Street Front
project summary
- A refresh of the Diamond Club to
maintain a truly premium experience for
the most premium customers
- Street front area previously
underutilized will target important
ballpark needs
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024

OPENING DAY
V2.118

LOOK & FEEL
2022

DIAMOND CLUB & STREET FRONT

V2.119

PROJECT DATA
• The best seats in the house
•
Intimat
e club with rich
finishes, updated lighting
solutions, and seamlessly
integrated memorabilia
•
Buf
fet style dining
•
Lar
ge feature bar at higher
ceiling area, pool table /
communal dining
•
Smaller
, more intimate craft
cocktail bar at lower area
•
Ne
w 1500 SF kitchen in
adjacent area
•
256 t
otal proposed seats
(net gain of 30 seats in
conservative game day
configuration
- 216 4-top dining seats
- 30 communal dining seats
- 10-to-14 barstools
- 22 lineal feet of drink rail

FIELD LEVEL

V2.120
existing
2022

DIAMOND CLUB & STREET FRONT
V2.121

FIELD LEVEL
V2.122
2022

DIAMOND CLUB & STREET FRONT
New press/staff dining
New pantry
Updated lobby
New tiered press conf. room
New kitchen
New PFD offices

PROPOSED
V2.123

FIELD LEVEL
New VIP entry
New players’
wives lounge
New guest services

PROJECT DATA
n/a
n/a
+20,450
$14,520,000
Seats (+/-)
SRO (+/-)
Gross SF
Est. Cost
• Diamond Club:
-$8,000,000 Project Cost
Street Front:
-$6,520,000 Project Cost
•
Intimat
e club with rich
finishes, updated lighting
solutions, and seamlessly
integrated memorabilia
•
Buf
fet style dining
•
Lar
ge feature bar at higher
ceiling area, pool table /
communal dining
•
Smaller
, more intimate craft
cocktail bar at lower area
•
Ne
w 1500 SF kitchen in
adjacent area
•
160 +/- dining seats
V2.124
2022

DIAMOND CLUB & STREET FRONT

PROPOSED
Food
Display
Buffet
Upper Dining
Upper Bar
Feature Bar
AV Wall
AV Wall
Entry
DN
Concierge
Drink Rail
DN
Drink Rail
Food Display
Semi-Private
Banquettes
Restrooms
Specialty
Cocktail Bar
Billiards
DN
Memorabilia
Display
POS
Drink Rail
Lower Dining
V2.125

FIELD LEVEL

PROJECT DATA
n/a
n/a
+10,500
$8,000,000
Seats (+/-)
SRO (+/-)
Gross SF
Est. Cost
• Buf fet style dining
•
Lar
ge feature bar at higher
ceiling area, pool table /
communal dining
•
Smaller
, more intimate craft
cocktail bar at lower area
•
Ne
w 1500 SF kitchen in
adjacent area
•
256 t
otal proposed seats
(net gain of 30 seats in
conservative game day
configuration
- 216 4-top dining seats
- 30 communal dining seats
- 10-to-14 barstools
- 22 lineal feet of drink rail
V2.126

V2.127

VIEW OF FEATURE BAR
An intimate club with rich finishes, updated lighting.

DIAMOND CLUB
V2.128

V2.129

VIEW OF FEATURE BAR
Located at area with higher ceilings.

DIAMOND CLUB
V2.130

V2.131

VIEW OF SPECIAL TY COCKTAIL BAR
Smaller, more intimate craft cocktail bar at lower area.

DIAMOND CLUB
V2.132
2022
Press Club
project summary
- One of the best behind-home-plate
locations would be reclaimed to provide
completely new revenue opportunities
for a new class of premium customers
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024

OPENING DAY
V2.134

LOOK & FEEL
2022

PRESS CLUB

V2.135

PROJECT DATA
• Gr eat views
•
Ala Car
te menu with
some display cooking for
entertainment value
•
Lar
ge feature bar
•
Spor
ts bar area with large
screens
•
Small signatur
e bar
•
Chef
’s table
•
Mixtur
e of light and dark
materials
•
Glas
s divider walls
•
Ne
w kitchen
•
Inc
orporate local art
•
Adds 299 int
erior dining
seats

LOWER PRESS

V2.136
existing
2022

PRESS CLUB
V2.137

LOWER PRESS
V2.138
2022

PROPOSED

PRESS CLUB
New mens restroom
New womens restroom
New service elevator
New kitchen 2350 SF
V2.139

LOWER PRESS

PROJECT DATA
+240
+50
+16,500
$18,500,000
Seats (+/-)
SRO (+/-)
Gross SF
Est. Cost
• Gr eat views
•
Ala Car
te menu with
some display cooking for
entertainment value
•
Lar
ge feature bar
•
Spor
ts bar area with large
screens
•
Small signatur
e bar
•
Chef
’s table
•
Mixtur
e of light and dark
materials
•
Ne
w kitchen

5.8 years
$99,300,000
$4,900,000+
Payback Period
Net ROI
Net New Rev.

V2.140
2022

PROPOSED

PRESS CLUB
Chef’s Table
Food Display
Bar
Display
Kitchen
Operable
Glass
Art
Drink Rails with Barstools
Luxury Loungers
with side tables
Luxury 4-Tops
Standard seats
Dining Experience Zone
Cocktail Bar Zone
V2.141

LOWER PRESS

PROJECT DATA
+240
+50
+16,500
$18,500,000
Seats (+/-)
SRO (+/-)
Gross SF
Est. Cost
• Adds 299 int erior dining
seats
•
Speak
easy adds about 28
soft lounge seats and 6
barstools
•
240 standar
d seats or...
- 80 luxury 4-tops +
wheelchair positions +
12 standard
- 80 luxury loungers +
wheelchair positions +
12 standard
- 120 drinkrail barstools +
wheelchair positions +
12 standard

5.8 years
$99,300,000
$4,900,000+
Payback Period
Net ROI
Net New Rev.

Art
Wine Display
Concierge
AV Wall
Signature
Bar
Fireplace
Entry
Cocktail Bar Zone
Press Club
Lounge
Sports Bar Zone
V2.142
2022

LOUNGE CHAIRS WITH TABLES

PRESS CLUB

V2.143
LUXURY 4-TOPS

PRESS CLUB

LOWER PRESS
V2.144

V2.145

VIEW OF PRESS CLUB INTERIOR
Great views with a mixture of light and dark materials.

PRESS CLUB
V2.146

V2.147

VIEW OF SIGNATURE BAR
Incorporation of local art.

PRESS CLUB
V2.148

V2.149

VIEW OF SPORTS BAR AREA
Large screens provide enhanced connection to on-field action.

PRESS CLUB
V2.150

LOOK & FEEL
2022

PRESS CLUB LOUNGE

V2.151

PROJECT DATA

LOWER PRESS
+240
+50
+16,500
$18,500,000
Seats (+/-)
SRO (+/-)
Gross SF
Est. Cost
• Moody , intimate club
•
C
ocktail bar
•
C
oncealed entrance
•
Special memor
abilia
displayed
•
C
omfortable banquettes
•
Dark, rich mat
erials
•
Seats appr
ox. 28 in love
seats and 6 barstools

V2.152

V2.153

VIEW OF PRESS CLUB LOUNGE
An intimate club featuring dark, rich materials and special memorabilia.

PRESS CLUB LOUNGE
V2.154
2022
Writing Press
Relocation
project summary
- By creating the Press Club, the writing
press will need a new space at the
ballpark. Through re-purposing the
suites found on the club level and taking
over a section of the terrace club, up to
75 writers will have a conditioned space
with great views of the game.

V2.155
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024

OPENING DAY
V2.156
2023
Writing PRess relocation
existing
V2.157

CLUB LEVEL
V2.158

PROPOSED
2023
Writing PRess relocation
V2.159

CLUB LEVEL

PROJECT DATA
+75
+215
+1,486
$1,600,000
Stations
Seats Lost
Gross SF
Est. Cost
• R elocated writing press on
the club level
•
R
elocate GM and V. GM
suites and reaplce with
writing press dining and
work stations
•
Ne
w writing press workroom
will has (2) two new toilet
rooms
•
Existing t
errace club seats
to be reallocated to writing
press stations
•
No sigthline obstructions for

terrace club patrons
V2.160

V2.161
Writing Press relocation

VIEW OF NEW WRITING PRESS
The new writing press location shown on the terrace club level V2.162
2023
Masterplan Projects
• Hall of Fame & Main Concourse Food Hall
V2.163
2023
Masterplan Projects
V2.164
2023
Hall of Fame & Main
Concourse Food Hall
project summary
- Updat e and amplify a new Mariner hall
of fame experience
-
Cr
eate a new food hall concept with
more points of sale at the busiest
entrance to the ballpark
-
R
elocate and replace bathrooms
V2.165
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024

OPENING DAY
V2.166

LOOK & FEEL
2023

HALL OF FAME & MAIN CONCOURSE FOOD HALL

V2.167

MAIN CONCOURSE

SPONSOR INTEGRATION
• L ocal Food and Drink
Destination
•
C
oncessions:

C
onsistent industrial look to
connect to prevailing Seattle
identity, with changeable
materials / elements for each
individual concession
V2.168
2023

HALL OF FAME & MAIN CONCOURSE FOOD HALL
existing
V2.169

MAIN CONCOURSE

V2.170

PROPOSED
2023

HALL OF FAME & MAIN CONCOURSE FOOD HALL
New bar / 4 P.O.S.

Existing elevator
New service elevator
Guest services / Hall of Fame
Video Boards
New hall of fame deck
Hall of fame displays
Food hall concepts / 12 P.O.S.

Food hall concepts / 9 P.O.S.

New mens restroom
New womens restroom
Kitchen
New Kitchen
Grab and go / 2 P.O.S.

V2.171

MAIN CONCOURSE

PROJECT DATA
n/a
n/a
+11,420
$16,295,000
Seats (+/-)
SRO (+/-)
Gross SF
Est. Cost
• Main C oncourse Food Hall
- $10
,100,000
•
Hall of F
ame
- $6
,195,000
•
Ne
w Hall of Fame structured
deck around the rotunda
- Int
eractive & digital Hall
of F
ame content
•
2 ne
w kitchen areas
- 1200 squar
e feet
- 550 squar
e feet
•
Pr
ep / Display / Service areas
- 1500 squar
e feet
- 14 P
.O.S.

V2.172

V2.173

HALL OF FAME & MAIN CONCOURSE FOOD HALL

VIEW OF THE MAIN CONCOURSE FOOD HALL
Local restaurants and new concepts could deliver innovative ballpark food offerings.

V2.174

V2.175

HALL OF FAME & MAIN CONCOURSE FOOD HALL

VIEW OF THE ROTUNDA HALL OF FAME
An updated and amplified front door experience for the ballpark, showcasing Mariners history.

V2.176

V2.177

HALL OF FAME & MAIN CONCOURSE FOOD HALL

VIEW OF THE HALL OF FAME
New digital and interactive displays showcasing Mariners history.

V2.178
Supplementary
Projects
• Hit it Her e Cafe
•
Sc
oreboard Bar
•
Club L
evel Renovation
•
Suit
e Level Renovation
•
Mariner Offic
e Shell Space
•
L
ookout Landing Treehouse
•
L
eft Field Gate Event Space
•
F
ield Access Tunnel Expansion
•
Ne
w Gate & Pedestrian Bridge Expansion
•
T
-Mobile Park Dugout Shift
•
F
ounders / Charter Seat Addition
T-Mobile Park
V2.179
Supplementary
Projects
T-Mobile Park

V2.180
Hit It Here Cafe
project summary
- Cr eate a re-imagined and updated space
for group sales
-
R
edevelop a kitchen with significantly
more firepower
-
R
emove the glass wall separating fans in
the seating bowl from the sounds of the
game and the ballpark
t-mobile park supplementary projects
V2.181

V2.182
Relocated and enlarged kitchen
New interior bar
Relocated bathrooms
Operable glass along concourse
Supplementary Projects

HIT IT HERE CAFE

PROPOSED
V2.183

CLUB LEVEL

PROJECT DATA
n/a
n/a
+8,650
$8,210,000
Seats (+/-)
SRO (+/-)
Gross SF
Est. Cost
• Cr eate an amenity for large
group sales, appropriate
for business groups and
networking events
•
Div
erse seating types /
lounge areas for informal
meetings
•
225 linear feet of st
orefront
- 80% oper
able glass
•
Ne
w cooking kitchen
•
R
elocated restroom block
V2.184

LOOK & FEEL

HIT IT HERE CAFE
Supplementary Projects

V2.185

SPONSOR INTEGRATION
• T ech Industry Partners:

LinkedIn, WeWork, Facebook
(or WorkPlace by Facebook)

CLUB LEVEL

V2.186
Scoreboard Bar
project summary
- Cr eate new sponsorship opportunities
-
Pr
ovide a highly visibile placemaker /
element within the seating bowl
-
De
velop a new experience for fans
t-mobile park supplementary projects
V2.187

V2.188
Supplementary Projects

SCOREBOARD BAR

PROPOSED

V2.189

BLEACHERS

PROJECT DATA
-300
+75
+6,172
$5,510,000
Seats (+/-)
SRO (+/-)
Gross SF
Est. Cost
• Ne w bar area integrated into
bleachers
•
Standing r
oom only drink
rails with views to the game,
with options for movable
furniture and other seating
types
•
Highly visible br
anding
opportunity
•
300 linear feet of standing

room only drink rail
•
Sponsor Int
egration:

Focused on stats and player
data, tied to scoreboard
story of displaying
information

V2.190
Club Level
Renovations
project summary
- Upgr ade and replace finishes throughout
the Club Level
-
Pr
ovide new and exciting seating
arrangements
-
De
velop new partnerships
t-mobile park supplementary projects
V2.191

V2.192
Supplementary Projects

CLUB LEVEL RENOVATIONS
V2.193

CLUB LEVEL

PROJECT DATA
n/a
n/a
+47,500
$14,540,000
Seats (+/-)
SRO (+/-)
Gross SF
Est. Cost
• 47 ,500 square feet of
interior renovations

V2.194
Suite Level
Renovations
project summary
- Suit e upgrades would refresh the
suite’s appearance with contemporary
materials, seating arrangements, and
improved views of the ballpark
t-mobile park supplementary projects
V2.195

V2.196
Supplementary Projects

SUITE LEVEL RENOVATIONS
V2.197

SUITE LEVEL

PROJECT DATA
n/a
n/a
+68,000
n/a
Seats (+/-)
SRO (+/-)
Gross SF
Est. Cost
• 68 ,000 square feet of
interior renovations

V2.198
Supplementary Projects

SUITE LEVEL RENOVATIONS

V2.199

PRECEDENT
• T op Left
T
-Mobile Arena
•
Middle L
eft
Raz
orback Stadium
•
Bott
om Left
Orlando city stadium
•
T
op Right
SunT
rust Park
•
Bott
om Right
Heinz Field

SUITE LEVEL

V2.200
Mariner Office
Shell Space
project summary
- A) A r enovation of the current
administrative office area would express
a new contemporary look with updated
amenities
-
B) R
elocating the Mariners
administrative offices outside of the
ballpark results in 38,400 square feet of
shell space split between two floors
t-mobile park supplementary projects
V2.201

V2.202
Supplementary Projects

MARINER OFFICE SHELL SPACE

LOOK & FEEL

V2.203
Club Level & SUITE LEVEL

PROJECT DATA
n/a
n/a
+38,400
n/a
Seats (+/-)
SRO (+/-)
Gross SF
Est. Cost
• 38 ,400 square feet of
interior renovations

V2.204
Lookout Landing
Treehouse
project summary
- Cr eate a new event space with
commanding views that delviers new
revenue opportunities
t-mobile park supplementary projects
V2.205

V2.206
Supplementary Projects
Lookout landing treehouse

PROPOSED
V2.207

UPPER CONCOURSE

PROJECT DATA
n/a
+150
+6,100
$8,105,000
Seats (+/-)
SRO (+/-)
Gross SF
Est. Cost
• 1 ,600 square feet of interior
space
•
4 ,500 square feet of exterior
space
•
Ne
w elevator with 4 stops
•
Ne
w stair connecting three
levels
•
40 linear feet of oper
able
glass wall
•
F
ully conditioned interior
space

V2.208
Left Field Gate
Event Space
project summary
- Cr eate a new 2 story event space over
the left field entry gate and plaza
-
A ne
w amphitheater, event space and
roofdeck provide new functional space
and revenue opportunities
t-mobile park supplementary projects
V2.209

V2.210
Supplementary Projects

LEFT FIELD GATE EVENT SPACE

PROPOSED
V2.211
Club, Suite, & UPPER CONCOURSE

V2.212
Supplementary Projects

PROPOSED

LEFT FIELD GATE EVENT SPACE

V2.213

PROJECT DATA
n/a
n/a
+13,000
$20,000,000
Seats (+/-)
SRO (+/-)
Gross SF
Est. Cost
• 7 ,500 square foot sloped
amphitheater
•
5 ,500 square foot roof deck
•
4 ,250 square foot glass and
steel roof
•
Infill betw
een existing
concourse and existing
ramp, above left field
entrance staircase
Club, Suite, & UPPER CONCOURSE
V2.214
Field Access Tunnel
Expansion
project summary
- W iden existing field access tunnel for
improved truck access to field
t-mobile park supplementary projects
V2.215

V2.216
Supplementary Projects
field access tunnel expansion
New column and foundation
New ramp wall and field wall
Remove existing ramp and field wall
V2.217

FIELD LEVEL

PROJECT DATA
n/a
n/a
+1,000
$765,000
Seats (+/-)
SRO (+/-)
Gross SF
Est. Cost
• Widening existing
field access tunnel to
accommodate larger trucks
and equipment

V2.218
Supplementary Projects
field access tunnel expansion
Modify interior layout
New column and foundation
New ramp wall and foundation
V2.219

FIELD LEVEL

PROJECT DATA
n/a
n/a
+1,000
$765,000
Seats (+/-)
SRO (+/-)
Gross SF
Est. Cost
• Widening existing
field access tunnel to
accommodate larger trucks
and equipment

V2.220
New Gate &
Pedestrian Bridge
Expansion
project summary
- Cr eate new bridge connecting plaza
west of parking garage to main
concourse
-
Expand gat
e line and security screening
out to new plaza space
t-mobile park supplementary projects
V2.221

V2.222
Supplementary Projects

NEW GATE & PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE EXPANSION

PROPOSED
Main concourse entry
to new bridge
Access to existing elevator
New bridge
New entry plaza with
security / ticketing space
V2.223

MAIN CONCOURSE

PROJECT DATA
n/a
n/a
+10,300
$5,725,000
Seats (+/-)
SRO (+/-)
Gross SF
Est. Cost
• 5 ,600 square foot, 24’-0”
wide pedestrian bridge
•
4 ,700 square foot new
entry plaza, enclosed with
ornamental fence, columns,
and gates
•
Ne
w pedestrian bridge
connects south parking
garage to main concourse
•
Ne
w vertical circulation to
grade

V2.224
Supplementary Projects

PROPOSED

NEW GATE & PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE EXPANSION
V2.225

PROJECT DATA
n/a
n/a
+10,300
$5,725,000
Seats (+/-)
SRO (+/-)
Gross SF
Est. Cost
• *Fr om Elevation shown
on 8/14/18 Bush, Roed
& Hitchings, Inc survey
2018144.00 (All elevations
are in City of Seattle Datum
(1977) - Approx. 9.7’ lower
than NAVD 88 datum)ze
•
** W
ASHDOT Design Manual
2017 - Min. vertical clearance
above pedestrian bridge

MAIN CONCOURSE

V2.226
Supplementary Projects

PROPOSED

NEW GATE & PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE EXPANSION

V2.227

MAIN CONCOURSE

V2.228
T-Mobile Park
Dugout Shift
project summary
- Establishing if T -Mobile Park could
accomodate moving the dugouts further
down the line
t-mobile park supplementary projects
V2.229

V2.230
11'-4"
49'-8"

SEATTLE

CURRENT
5'-1"
8'-9"
56'-7"
56'-7"
11'-4"
49'-8"
V2.231
11'-4"
49'-8"

SEATTLE

CURRENT
5'-1"
8'-9"
56'-7"
56'-7"
11'-4"
49'-8"
t-mobile park dugout shift

VIEW OF T-MOBILE PARK CURRENT DUGOUT LOCATION
V2.232
AD
A5-2-111
A7
A5-6-22
7 R

SEATTLE
VS

ATLANTA
33'-0"
35'-3"41'-0"
45'-4"
51'-1"
41'-0"
31'-6"
35'-4"
V2.233
AD
A5-2-111
A7
A5-6-22
7 R

SEATTLE
VS

ATLANTA
33'-0"
35'-3"41'-0"
45'-4"
51'-1"
41'-0"
31'-6"
35'-4"
t-mobile park dugout shift
VIEW OF T-MOBILE PARK CURRENT DUGOUT LOCATION VS. SUNTRUST PARK V2.234

SEATTLE
VS

NY YANKEES
18'-4"
41'-1"51'-0"
20'-4"20'-4"
51'-0"
13'-5"
41'-3"
V2.235

SEATTLE
VS

NY YANKEES
18'-4"
41'-1"51'-0"
20'-4"20'-4"
51'-0"
13'-5"
41'-3"
t-mobile park dugout shift
VIEW OF T-MOBILE PARK CURRENT DUGOUT LOCATION VS. YANKEE STADIUM V2.236
2018 NETTING EXTENTS

SEATTLE
VS

HOK OPTION
38'-6"
41'-7"
56'-6"
47'-2"
47'-2"
56'-6"
38'-6"
41'-7"
V2.237
2018 NETTING EXTENTS

SEATTLE
VS

HOK OPTION
38'-6"
41'-7"
56'-6"
47'-2"
47'-2"
56'-6"
38'-6"
41'-7"
t-mobile park dugout shift
VIEW OF T-MOBILE PARK CURRENT DUGOUT LOCATION VS. PROPOSED LOCATION V2.238
Founders / Charter
Seat Addition
project summary
- Establishing if T -Mobile Park could
accomodate founders / charter seats
near the visiting team dugout
t-mobile park supplementary projects
V2.239

V2.240
TOC +1'-0"
TOC +0'-0"
DN
DN
UP
UP
(8) ACCESSIBLE SPACES TO INCLUDE
REMOVABLE 22" SEAT WITH PLATE/ WHEELS.
(OPTION: PADDED FOLDING CHAIR).

NEW 22" SEAT; END STANCHION
MOVED FROM EXISTING LOCATION.

MIN
3'-0"
MIN 3'-0"
SEATS TO BE RE-NUMBERED @ ALL EXISTING ROWS
WHERE SEATS ARE ADDED -(7) TOTAL ROWS
(4) 22" SEATS; END STANCHION MOVED

FROM EXISTING LOCATION THIS ROW
(4) 22" SEATS; END STANCHION MOVED

FROM EXISTING LOCATION THIS ROW
(4) 22" SEATS; END

STANCHION MOVED FROM
EXISITNG LOCATION.(4) 22" SEATS; END

STANCHION MOVED FROM
EXISITNG LOCATION.

MIN 3'-0"(2) 22" SEATS; END

STANCHION MOVED FROM
EXISITNG LOCATION.

EXISTING ROW OF (14) SEATS TO BE REATTACHED

TO STADIA TO ALLOW FOR TWO ADDITIONAL SEATS
AS SHOWN AND 36" CLEAR AISLE AT 1ST BASE SIDE.

ALL NEW CONNECTION HARDWARE REQUIRED FOR
RELOCATED SEATS AND STANCHIONS.
(8) FIXED 22" SEATS AT EACH ACESSIBLE SPACE.
6 A4
-
---
7 A4
(8) 22" SEATS WITH END STANCHIONS.

TV MONITOR LOCATION

POWER / DATA CONNECTION
RE: DESIGN ASSIST ELEC. CONTRACTOR

TV MONITOR LOCATION

POWER / DATA CONNECTION
RE: DESIGN ASSIST ELEC. CONTRACTOR

TV MONITOR LOCATION

POWER / DATA CONNECTION
RE: DESIGN ASSIST ELEC. CONTRACTOR

SOLID SURFACE DRINKRAIL

CONCRETE / BRICK VENEER FIELD
WALL WITH CAST STONE CAP.
5'-0"
4'-8"
4'-6"
57 78
84 17
30 CROSSAISLE
266 SEATS + 1WC
LOSS OF 48 SEATS

DUE TO DUGOUT

RELOCATION

VIEW OF FOUNDERS / CHARTER SEATS
Proposed seat locations.

V2.241
TOC +1'-0"
TOC +0'-0"
UP
UP
F20F4
F20F3
F20F2
F18J1
F15H3
F15H1
F17D1
F10E4
F10E5
F10E2
F10E3
DN
FEC
FEC
FEC
FEC
D
FEC
W
D D
W WW
FEC
FEC
W
D
W
W
W
D
D
FEC
FEC
FEC
FECFEC
F12F
F12D
F12E
F18M2
F08H3
F08H1
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
SLOPE
SLOPE
DN
DN
UP
UP
(8) ACCESSIBLE SPACES TO INCLUDE
REMOVABLE 22" SEAT WITH PLATE/ WHEELS.
(OPTION: PADDED FOLDING CHAIR).

NEW 22" SEAT; END STANCHION
MOVED FROM EXISTING LOCATION.

MIN
3'-0"
MIN 3'-0"
SEATS TO BE RE-NUMBERED @ ALL EXISTING ROWS
WHERE SEATS ARE ADDED -(7) TOTAL ROWS
(4) 22" SEATS; END STANCHION MOVED

FROM EXISTING LOCATION THIS ROW
(4) 22" SEATS; END STANCHION MOVED

FROM EXISTING LOCATION THIS ROW
(4) 22" SEATS; END

STANCHION MOVED FROM
EXISITNG LOCATION.(4) 22" SEATS; END

STANCHION MOVED FROM
EXISITNG LOCATION.

MIN 3'-0"(2) 22" SEATS; END

STANCHION MOVED FROM
EXISITNG LOCATION.

EXISTING ROW OF (14) SEATS TO BE REATTACHED

TO STADIA TO ALLOW FOR TWO ADDITIONAL SEATS
AS SHOWN AND 36" CLEAR AISLE AT 1ST BASE SIDE.

ALL NEW CONNECTION HARDWARE REQUIRED FOR
RELOCATED SEATS AND STANCHIONS.
(8) FIXED 22" SEATS AT EACH ACESSIBLE SPACE.
6 A4
-
---
7 A4
(8) 22" SEATS WITH END STANCHIONS.

TV MONITOR LOCATION

POWER / DATA CONNECTION
RE: DESIGN ASSIST ELEC. CONTRACTOR

TV MONITOR LOCATION

POWER / DATA CONNECTION
RE: DESIGN ASSIST ELEC. CONTRACTOR

TV MONITOR LOCATION

POWER / DATA CONNECTION
RE: DESIGN ASSIST ELEC. CONTRACTOR

SOLID SURFACE DRINKRAIL

CONCRETE / BRICK VENEER FIELD
WALL WITH CAST STONE CAP.
5'-0"
4'-8"
4'-6"
17 30

CROSSAISLE
266 SEATS + 1WC
LOSS OF 48 SEATS

DUE TO DUGOUT

RELOCATION

RECONFIGURE

DUGOUT TUNNEL

VIEW OF FOUNDERS / CHARTER SEATS
Proposed impact to Field Level.

Founders / charter seat addition
V2.242

V2.243

V2.244

V3.1
capital planning & masterplan

ENERGIZING THE DISTRICT
t-mobile park
VOLUME 03
1 SPRING 2019

V3.2
contents
VOLUME 1: enhancing an icon
Capital Planning Overview
Year-by-Year Plan
Multi-Year Funding Analysis
PG. 6-31
PG. 32-57
PG. 58-63
PG. 64-73
Masterplan Projects Overview
Year-by-Year Upgrade Projects
Supplemental Projects
Concert Hall & Amphitheater
Mixed-Use Development District
Parking Structure Annex / Expansion
Transit Improvements
VOLUME 2: ballpark, reimagined
VOLUME 3: ENERGIZING THE DISTRICT
PG. 4-11
PG. 12-177
PG. 178-241
PG. 14-21
PG. 22-35
PG. 36-43
V3.3
“I have a little project.”
EAGLE HARDWARE AND GARDEN COMMERCIAL, 1996

EDGAR MARTINEZ
DH / THIRD BASEMAN (1987-2004), MARINER LEGEND, AND HALL OF FAME INDUCTEE - CLASS OF 2019

V3.4
VOLUME 3:

Energizing the
District

V3.5

V3.6
Masterplan Projects

BALLPARK DISTRICT
• Concert Hall & Amphitheater
• Mixed-Use District Development
• Parking Structure Annex / Expansion
• Transit Improvements
V3.7
Masterplan Projects

BALLPARK DISTRICT
V3.8
ballpark district
Concert Hall &
Amphitheater
project summary
- V ersatile indoor/outdoor concert venue
- Situated above existing parking
parking structure
- New office building frontage along
Occidental Ave S
- 2 New levels of structured parking
V3.9

V3.10

CONCERT HALL & AMPHITHEATER
1 2
3 existing

PROPOSED
District Projects
OCCIDENTAL AVE. S
V3.11

BALLPARK DISTRICT
EDGAR MARTINEZ DR. S

PROJECT DATA
Stalls (+/-)
Floors (+/-)
Gross SF
(1) Venue
Interior Venue
Outdoor Lawn
(2) Office Bldg
(3) Add’l Prkg

Est. Cost
(1) Venue
(2) Office Bldg
(3) Add’l Prkg
Est. Total

+120
5 +91,500 SF
+32,630 SF
+96,500 SF
+42,000 SF
$68,165,043
$41,017,134
$9,286,832
$118,469,609
• (1) New indoor/outdoor
concert venue situated
above existing parking
•
(2)
New 60’ wide office
building liner situated to
west of existing garage.

Office raised 17’ above
Occidental Plaza below
•
(3)
Additional two levels of
structured parking above
the southern end of existing
garage
V3.12
Existing Garage
Outdoor Lawn
Concert Hall
Stage
V3.13

CROSS SECTION
Amphitheater situated above existing parking structure.

CONCERT HALL & AMPHITHEATER
V3.14

V3.15

INDOOR USE
Featuring enclosed-only configuration.

CONCERT HALL & AMPHITHEATER
V3.16

V3.17
INDOOR + OUTDOOR USE
Featuring combo configuration allowing for max capacity of approx. 6500.

CONCERT HALL & AMPHITHEATER
V3.18
Outdoor Lawn
New Office Building Extents
V3.19
PLAN
Showing amphitheater components and connection to proposed ‘office bar.’

CONCERT HALL & AMPHITHEATER
Standing
Room
V3.20

V3.21

EXISTING CONDITION
Current parking structure.

CONCERT HALL & AMPHITHEATER
V3.22

V3.23

PROPOSED CONDITION
Amphitheater situated above existing parking structure.

CONCERT HALL & AMPHITHEATER
V3.24

V3.25

PROPOSED CONDITION
Amphitheater massing shown in context to T-Mobile Park.

CONCERT HALL & AMPHITHEATER
V3.26

V3.27

PROPOSED CORNER CONDITION
Looking SE showing new office structure alongside existing garage.

CONCERT HALL & AMPHITHEATER
V3.28

V3.29

VIEW OF CONCERT HALL INTERIOR
Showing fixed seating, standing room area, and raised stage element.

CONCERT HALL & AMPHITHEATER
V3.30

V3.31

VIEW OF CONCERT HALL INTERIOR
Showing fixed seating, standing room area, and raised stage element.

CONCERT HALL & AMPHITHEATER
V3.32
ballpark district
Mixed-Use District
Development
project summary
- Study feasibility of a Mariner s District
adjacent to the ballpark and consistent
with local real estate trends
- Provide a mix of hotel, office, health
services, entertainment, and generous
public spaces
- Demonstrate comparisons with

r
elatable ballpark evelopments found in
other MLB cities throughout the country
V3.33

V3.34

ENTERTAINMENT & HOSPITALITY BLOCK
District Projects

PROPOSED
V3.35

BALLPARK DISTRICT

PROJECT DATA
Add’l Parking
42,000 SF Outdoor Space
Concert Hall & Amphitheater
124,130 SF
Partial Outdoor Space
Outdoor Public Space
25,000 SF
Outdoor Space
General Mixed-Use Program
131,700 SF
Team Offices
64,500 SF
Meeting
27,450 SF
Exhibit
12,000 SF
+327,150 SF NEW INDOOR PROGRAM
+99,630 SF

NEW OUTDOOR PR
OGRAM
V3.36

ENTERTAINMENT & HOSPITALITY BLOCK
District Projects

PROPOSED

V3.37

BALLPARK DISTRICT

NEW OUTDOOR PR
OGRAM

V3.38

BALLPARK DISTRICT
District Projects
existing
A
B
V3.39
+/- 143,710 SF
IC-85; FAR 3.0
*Stadium District
+/- 99,922 SF
IC-85; FAR 3.0
*Stadium District
+/- 138,020 SF
IC-85; FAR 3.0
*Stadium District
+/- 102,130 SF
IC-85; FAR 3.0
*Stadium District
+/- 87,825 SF
IC-85; FAR 3.0
*Stadium District
+/- 212,737 SF
IG1 U/85;
FAR 2.5
+/- 203,868 SF
IG2 U/85;
FAR 2.5
Block A
Block Area
Zoning
Block B
Block Area
Zoning
Block C
Block Area
Zoning
Block D
Block Area
Zoning
Block E
Block Area
Zoning
Block F
Block Area
Zoning
Block G
Block Area
Zoning
C
D
E
F
G

BALLPARK DISTRICT

PROJECT DATA
V3.40

BALLPARK DISTRICT
District Projects
A
B

PROPOSED
V3.41
+/- 143,710 SF
+ 188,000 SF
IC-85; FAR 3.0
*Stadium District
+/- 99,922 SF
+ 350,260 SF
IC-85; FAR 3.0
*Stadium District
+/- 138,020 SF
+ 494,979 SF
IC-85; FAR 3.0
*Stadium District
+/- 102,130 SF
+ 408,000 SF
IC-85; FAR 3.0
*Stadium District
+/- 87,825 SF
+ 37,920 SF
IC-85; FAR 3.0
*Stadium District
+/- 212,737 SF
+ 531,842 SF
IG1 U/85;
FAR 2.5
+/- 203,868 SF
+ 66,600 SF
IG2 U/85;
FAR 2.5
Block A
Block Area
Floor Area
(Est).

Zoning
Block B
Block Area
Floor Area
(Est).

Zoning
Block C
Block Area
Floor Area
(Est).

Zoning
Block D
Block Area
Floor Area
(Est).

Zoning
Block E
Block Area
Floor Area
(Est).

Zoning
Block F
Block Area
Floor Area
(Est).

Zoning
Block G
Block Area
Floor Area
(Est).

Zoning
TOTAL EST. FLOOR AREA
APPROX. 2,077,601
C
D
E
F
G

PROJECT DATA
V3.42
A
B
EDGAR MARTINEZ DR. S
C
D
V3.43

AERIAL VIEW OF MARINERS SODO DISTRICT

BALLPARK DISTRICT
E
F
G

OCCIDENTAL AVE S
1ST AVE S
V3.44

V3.45
APPROX. DISTRICT ACREAGE

BALLPARK DISTRICT
V3.46
District Projects

DISTRICT COMPARISON
texas - live!
V3.47

PROJECT DATA
Texas Live!
Arlington, TX
Development Footprint:
12 Acres

BALLPARK DISTRICT
V3.48
District Projects

DISTRICT COMPARISON
texas - live!
V3.49

SCALE COMPARISON
Mariners District with Texas Live development.

BALLPARK DISTRICT
V3.50
District Projects

DISTRICT COMPARISON

BALLPARK VILLAGE
V3.51

PROJECT DATA
Ballpark Village
St. Louis, MO
Development Footprint:
11 Acres

BALLPARK DISTRICT
V3.52
District Projects

DISTRICT COMPARISON

BALLPARK VILLAGE
V3.53

SCALE COMPARISON
Mariners District with Ballpark Village development.

BALLPARK DISTRICT
V3.54
District Projects

DISTRICT COMPARISON
the battery atlanta
V3.55

PROJECT DATA
The Battery Atlanta
Cobb County, GA
Development Footprint:
44 Acres

BALLPARK DISTRICT
V3.56
District Projects

DISTRICT COMPARISON
the battery atlanta
V3.57

SCALE COMPARISON
Mariners District with The Battery Atlanta development.

BALLPARK DISTRICT
V3.58
ballpark district
Parking Structure
Annex / Expansion
project summary
- Annex Structur e: 4.5 floors of elevated
parking deck above existing surface lot
-
Expansion Structur
e: 2 floors of new
parking deck directly above the existing
structure
V3.59

V3.60

PARKING STRUCTURE ANNEX
existing

PROPOSED
District Projects
OCCIDENTAL AVE. S
V3.61

BALLPARK DISTRICT

PROJECT DATA
+470
+4.5 Elev. Flrs.
+276,568 SF
$35,395,550
Stalls (+/-)
Floors
Gross SF
Est. Cost
• Ne w parking garage situated
along the current structure’s
eastern side
•
4 .5 floors of new, elevated
parking deck to align with
existing levels of the current
garage
•
L
owest structured floor has
substantially less floor area
than upper levels, allowing
for clearance of large trucks
and staging equipment
underneath at grade
•
Ne
w 2-way speed ramps at
south side of existing garage
at various levels to alleviate
volume increases
EDGAR MARTINEZ DR. S
V3.62

PARKING STRUCTURE EXPANSION
existing

PROPOSED
District Projects
OCCIDENTAL AVE. S
V3.63

BALLPARK DISTRICT

PROJECT DATA
+644
+2
+201,600 SF
$37,150,687
Stalls (+/-)
Floors
Gross SF
Est. Cost
• C onsists of two new parking
floors directly above the
existing structure
•
Ext
ents of the new parking
decks align with the existing
garage below
•
Existing gar
age structure
to be retrofitted to reflect
modified loads
EDGAR MARTINEZ DR. S
V3.64
Transit
Improvements
project summary
- Establish a planning o verlay to maximize
multimodal networks
-
Establishing a for
ward thinking
framework for the numerous ways in
which people will arrive to and leave
from T-Mobile Park as the neighborhood
and city continue to develop
ballpark district
V3.65

V3.66

V3.67

VIEW OF THE ADJACENT WSDOT / SDOT LOT
WSDOT / SDOT have indicated that this lot may be available to development in the near future

RIDE SHARE DROP OFF / PICK UPRIDE SHARE DROP OFF / PICK UP V3.68
Supplementary Projects
Ride share drop off / pick up

PROPOSED
V3.69
Hwy Access Ramp Above
TNC Exit
TNC Entrance
TNC 15 Min Parking
Drop-off Lanes
Drive Lanes
Crosswalk
Access Stair
Elevator
3RD AVE S.

V3.70

V3.71

RIDE SHARE DROP OFF / PICK UP

VIEW OF THE ADJACENT WSDOT / SDOT LOT
WSDOT / SDOT have indicated that this lot may be available to development in the near future

RIDE SHARE DROP OFF / PICK UP
V3.72
S. Atlantic St.
s Royal Brougham Way
1st Ave
Occidental
Utah Ave S.

V3.73
CenturyLink/ Wamu Parking coordination
Increase parking capacity
Improve street experience to encourage use of underutilized area Proposed new TNC (Uber/ Lyft/ taxi) Station
Royal Brougham Station UW parking exchange
Continue pedestrian corridor to ballpark
Colman Dock - Improve ferry ridership
Main St. Corridor - improve pedestrian circulation via. new park corridor King St. Station/ Int. Station
Ballpark pathway to mass transit

VIEW OF THE SURROUNDING TRANSIT OPPORTUNITIES
Included: existing, in progress, in development, and potential future projects

BALLPARK PATHWAY TO MASS TRANSIT
V3.74
Thank you for the opportunity to assist the Mariners in realizing their long-term vision for a next generation
masterplan and capital improvements study for T-Mobile
Park. We appreciate the Mariners’ commitment to maintaining a world-class ballpark as well as your continued role as a model organization in Seattle’s already world-class working environment. Commitment means a lot to us, and it is our hope that this masterplan demonstrates the commitment of the Populous and Brailsford & Dunlavey teams to delivering an inspiring and realistic roadmap for the future of the Home of the Seattle Mariners.

T-Mobile Park has remained a one-of-a-kind experience for decades-worth of baseball fans. It is our promise that we will build on this by delivering the very best for future generations of Mariners fans for many years to come.

Pat Tangen,
Principal-in-Charge
Populous
our thanks

V3.75

V3.76

V3.77

V3.78

4800 Main Street, Suite 300
Kansas City, MO 64112 USA POPULOUS.COM
O +1 816 221 1500
F +1 816 221 15 78

Anaheim City CouncilMay 16, 2023

Anaheim City Council
May 16, 2023