SusanaBarrios
From: TheresaBass
Sent: Tuesday, July18, 20238:54AM
To: PublicComment
Subject: Fwd: \[EXTERNAL\] MeasureA
Beginforwardedmessage:
From: RoxaneCornell <
Date: July18, 2023at8:44:04AM PDT
To: [email protected], NatalieRubalcava <[email protected]>, JoseDiaz [email protected]>, "CarlosA. Leon" <[email protected]>, "NormaC. Kurtz" [email protected]>, StephenFaessel <[email protected]>, NatalieMeeks [email protected]>
Cc: TheresaBass <[email protected]>, [email protected] Subject: \[EXTERNAL\] MeasureA
Warning: Thisemailoriginatedfrom outsidetheCity of Anaheim. Donotclicklinksor open attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.
DearCityCouncil,
I firstliketo thankallof youfor yourdedicationto theCityof Anaheim! I amalongtimeresident of Anaheimin District2, I amalsoemployedlocally.
In regardsto MeasureA youareconfirmingthatAnaheimwouldNEGATIVELYimpactedif it wereto passasit wouldleadto graveeconomicconsequencesfor notjustbusinessbutfor residents! MyfamilyandI havedisusedthatif measureA passes, wewillsellandmoveoutof state! This measurewouldtakeawaysomanyjobs, andthequalityof ourlifewouldchangenegatively! We agreedit wouldbebetterto sellandgetout. I wouldhateto livewherearestreetscan't besafe becauseof thejobintactthatit wouldcause!
I amsincerelygratefulthatyourecognizethedamagingimpactMeasureA wouldhaveonourentire community! I begyouto adopttheresolutionto officiallyopposeMeasureA Sincerely,
RoxaneCornell
Localresidentdistrict2
1 1
SusanaBarrios
From: PublicComment
From:
Date: July 18, 2023 at 8: 19: 52 AM PDT
To: Ashleigh Aitken AAitken@anaheim. net>, Natali Rudometkin NRudometkin@anaheim. net>, Jose Diaz JoDiaz@anaheim. net>, Carlos A. Leon" CLeon@anaheim. net>, Norma C. Kurtz" NKurtz@anaheim. net>, Stephen Faessel SFaessel@anaheim. net>, Natalie Meeks NMeeks@anaheim. net> Cc: Jim Vanderpool JVanderpool@anaheim. net>, Theresa Bass TBass@anaheim. net> Subject: EXTERNAL] Resolution to Officially Oppose Measure A Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message.
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
A quick note of thanks for your dedication to the City of Anaheim, our neighborhoods, communities, and residents.
We appreciate your recognizing that Measure A would lead to grave economic consequences to the small business community, residents and vital services the city provides to our community.
I urge you to adopt the resolution to officially oppose Measure A.
Sincerely,
Cathy Dutton
District 3, Small Business
The highest compliment I can receive is the referral of friends & family.
Thank you for your trust!
SusanaBarrios
From: TheresaBass
Sent: Monday, July17, 20235:32PM
To: PublicComment
Subject: LettertoCouncilREAgendaItem16 (ResoOpposingMeasureA) Attachments: Outlook-dqnnurrr; LettertoCouncilRE7-18-2023AgendaItem16.pdf From: LauraCunningham <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, July17, 20235:26PM
To: AshleighAitken <[email protected]>; NatalieRubalcava <[email protected]>; JoseDiaz [email protected]>; CarlosA. Leon <[email protected]>; NormaC. Kurtz <[email protected]>; Stephen Faessel <[email protected]>; NatalieMeeks <[email protected]> Cc: TheresaBass <[email protected]>; CityManager <[email protected]> Subject: \[EXTERNAL\] LettertoCouncilREAgendaItem16 (ResoOpposingMeasureA) Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropenattachments unlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.
DearMayorAitkenandmembersoftheCityCouncil:
PleasefindletterofsupportforAgendaItem16ontomorrow'sCouncilagenda.
LAURACUNNINGHAM
President & CEO
O 714-758-0222 |
[email protected]
1 2099 S. State College Blvd., Suite 650 Anaheim, CA 92806 T ( 714) 758 - 0222 AnaheimChamber. org July 17, 2023
Anaheim City Council
200 S. Anaheim Blvd.
Anaheim, CA 92805
RE: Agenda Item 16 – Resolution Opposing Measure A
Dear Mayor Aitken and Members of the City Council:
The Anaheim Chamber of Commerce supports Agenda Item 16 on the July 18 Council agenda to adopt a resolution in opposition to Measure A on the October 3 special election ballot.
The Baker Tilly fiscal impact analysis commissioned by the City found that the passage of Measure A would mean the impact on just the Anaheim Convention Center alone would cost the City budget nearly $ 9 million in reduced revenues.
As we know, the initiative has a far broader impact, applying to every hotel and every event center in Anaheim. It is safe to say the negative impact on city revenues will be significantly higher than simply the $ 9 million hit from decreased Convention Center revenues.
The Beacon Economics fiscal impact analysis commissioned by the City Council found Measure A will cost Anaheim taxpayers at least $ 4 million each year from reduced hotel tax revenue. At the June 13 Council meeting, the City’s Finance staff estimated that Measure A’s costs to the City budget would rise to $ 68 million per year within a decade.
Measure A is a ticking time bomb that imposes destructive, complicated and onerous work rules that will make it difficult, if not impossible, for the many family- owned, independent hotels in Anaheim to operate.
Measure A will triple or even quadruple housekeeping costs . The costly litigation stemming from even minor failures to comply with the initiative’s byzantine rules could prove ruinous for many Anaheim businesses. It is a gift to trial attorneys looking to profit from lawsuits over technical issues.
A wide array of non- hotel event centers ranging from miniature golf courses to bowling alleys to nonprofit organizations to houses of worship would also be devastated by the impacts of Measure A.
Further, Measure A requires the City to construct a bureaucracy to respond to complaints resulting from this measure. The Baker Tilly report commissioned by Anaheim City Council
July 18, 2023
2099 S. State College Blvd., Suite 650 Anaheim, CA 92806 T ( 714) 758 - 0222 AnaheimChamber. org the City estimates it will cost the City at least $ 750, 000 per year to set up the unit to respond to Measure A complaints.
We thank Councilmember Natalie Meeks for asking for Agenda Item 16 to be agendized for the City Council to formally oppose Measure A.
On behalf of the members of the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce and the broader Anaheim business community, I urge the council to approve Agenda Item 16 to oppose Measure A.
Sincerely,
Laura Cunningham
President and CEO
Anaheim Chamber of Commerce
SusanaBarrios
From: TheresaBass
Sent: Monday, July17, 202311:00PM
To: PublicComment
Subject: FW: \[EXTERNAL\] AOCHLAletterre. Item16 - ResolutioninoppositiontoMeasureA Attachments: 2023-07-17AOCHLAletterre. Item16 - ResolutioninoppositiontoMeasureA.pdf From: NadineBarragan <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, July17, 20232:40PM
To: AshleighAitken <[email protected]>; NatalieRubalcava <[email protected]>; NormaC. Kurtz [email protected]>; JoseDiaz <[email protected]>; CarlosA. Leon <[email protected]>; StephenFaessel [email protected]>; NatalieMeeks <[email protected]> Cc: SamanthaMarquez <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; BereniceBallinas <[email protected]>; MelissaO. Cuevas <[email protected]>; RobertMendoza <[email protected]>; SarahBartczak <[email protected]>; TaylorN. Griffin [email protected]>; NamBartash <[email protected]>; JimVanderpool <[email protected]>; TheresaBass <[email protected]>
Subject: \[EXTERNAL\] AOCHLAletterre. Item16 - ResolutioninoppositiontoMeasureA Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropenattachments unlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.
DearMayorAitkenandMembersof theCityCouncil:
Foryourconsideration, pleaseseetheattachedletterfromAOCHLAregardingItem16 - Resolutionin oppositionto MeasureA.
Best,
Nadine
1 July 17, 2023
The Hon. Ashleigh Aitken & Members of the City Council
City of Anaheim
200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, 7th Floor
Anaheim, CA 92805
Subject: July 18, 2023 City Council Meeting Agenda Item 16 - Strong Support Dear Mayor Aitken and Members of the City Council:
On behalf of the Anaheim/Orange County Hotel and Lodging Association (AOCHLA) and its members, I write in strong support of Item 16 of the agenda for the July 18, 2023 meeting of the City Council.
Over the last several months, Anaheim’s hotel and lodging industry and industry-adjacent businesseshave sought to make clear that Measure A would be devastating for Anaheim’s hotels, Anaheim’s budget, and Anaheim’s residents.With the City Council’s guidance, the City commissioned multiple independent studies of Measure A’s impacts, which found that the measurewould have significant detrimental impacts on city- owned revenue-generating facilities and on the long-term health of the city’s tourism industry.
If Measure A were to pass, very few would benefit in the short term, while a great many would suffer in the long-term. The implications are stark: job cuts, shuttered hotels, decreasedtax revenues,and ultimately decreasedservices for Anaheim’s residents.Given these,AOCHLA was heartenedby the City Council’s decisions to order Measure A to a special election and to submit a ballot argument opposing the measure.A City Council resolution formally opposing the measurewould make the City Council’s position doubly clear and help guide voters with the benefit of the City Council’ s collective experience, perspective of fiduciary responsibility, and subject matter expertise. As we enter into what is sure to be a contestedcampaign, it is imperative that Anaheim’s voters know what Anaheim’s leadersknow: Measure A is wrong for Anaheim.
I respectfully request your support of Item 16. Thank you for your kind consideration.
Sincerely,
Executive Director
SusanaBarrios
From: RoyaJavaherchi <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, July11,
To: AshleighAitken; NatalieRubalcava; JoseDiaz; CarlosA. Leon; StephenFaessel; Norma C. Kurtz; NatalieMeeks; PublicComment
Cc: TannazRazzaghi; Maryam; amirabbassabei; MitraMosallaie Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] Re: AnaheimConventionCenter
Warning: Thisemailoriginatedfrom outsidetheCity of Anaheim. Donotclicklinksor open attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.
DearMayorandDearCityCouncilMembers ,
Imustexpressmydeepdisappointment. Thisbeautifulland, USA, shouldshineasabeaconof freedomofspeech, respect, anddemocracy. Itistrulyunbelievable! Sadly, thisoutcomedoesnotcomeasasurprise. IftheworldfailstostandwithIranianpeopleagainst thisbrutalregimeinIran , andcontinuestoengageinlobbyingandnegotiationswiththisterrorist regime, thingswillonlyworsen. Eventhisbeautifulcountrywillundergoprofoundchanges. Theruling MullahsinIranadheretoanideologythattheyseektoexportworldwide.
SincewhenhavewebeenforbiddentowearaT-shirtwiththename "MAHSAAMINI" onit? Since whenhavewebeendeniedtherighttoproudlycarrytherealflagsofIrantoanyevent? ThisbrutalregimeinIranonlybringschaos, spreadshatred, andincitesviolencewhereverit goes.
IimploretheUnitedStatestoawakenandnotheedthelobbyistsoftheIranianregime. The courageouspeopleinIrancontinuetofight, andweareheretoamplifytheirvoices. Iranwillbefree throughthepoweroftheIranianpeoplewithinthecountry. However, weexpectpoliticiansandthose inpositionsofpower, suchasmayors, senators, andcitycouncilmembers, tosupportusandcease lobbyingwithagentsofthisbrutalregime. Theiragentsintherealmofsportsdisplayacomplete disregardforthetrueessenceofsportsmanship. Theyhavemanagedtoruineveryaspectandexploit everysportingoccasionsolelyfortheirownbenefit.
Sincerely, RoyaJavaherchi
OnTue, Jul11, 2023at12:26PMMitraMosallaie < wrote:
DearMayorandCityCouncilMembers;
I attendedfourof thevolleyballNationalLeaguegamesatAnaheimConventionCenterlastweek! 1 I wasshockedto seehowI wasdeprivedfrommybasicrightsasaUScitizenandespeciallyasabusiness ownerin Anaheimwhohavepaidtaxdollarsto thiscity.
I wasnotallowedto enterthebuildingbecauseI hadIran'sflagonmyshirtwhilenowherein theprohibited itemswasmentioninganyregulationsonT- Shirtfor July4thgames.
Shockinglytheregulationschangedfor thenextgameand limitationsontheT-shirt wasaddedtothe prohibitedlist.
OnJuly6th, I wasnotallowedto enterthevenuebecausemyt-shirthadapictureof MahsaAmini! (Youhave heardthisnameduringourrequestto passtheIranresolution)
Wewerenotallowedto carryUSflagand/or Iran'sflagto thevenue! Evenon4thof July!!!!! Whythisgame haddifferentregulationscompareto thegamesinpreviousyears? Suchadisappointmentto seeacitywhohaspassedaresolutionto condemnthebarbaricregimeof Iranis workingwiththeirlobbyiststo modifytheregulations.
Lookingforwardto yourresponse!
Respectfully,
MitraMosallaie
Pleaselookattheattachedreg
RoyaJavaherchi
Dateolate
ChocolateWithDates, HealthiermoreSatisfying
www.dateolate.com
www.sweetsaffrons.com
Phone :
2 SusanaBarrios
From: [email protected]
Sent:
To: [email protected]; 'TeresaPomeroy'; 'PublicRecordsRequest'; 'PamHaddad'; ca.gov; 'MariaStipe'; [email protected]; 'Nick
Dibs'; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Public Comment; TheresaBass; senator. gov;
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; assemblymember.quirk- [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] Temeculaschoolboardjoinslawsuitagainstsocialmediagiants Attachments: Temeculaschoolboardjoinslawsuitagainstsocialmediagiants.pdf Warning: Thisemailoriginatedfrom outsidetheCity of Anaheim. Donotclicklinksor open attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage. 07-14-2023
P.R.D.D.C.)
PARENTSFORTHERIGHTSOFDEVELOPMENTALLYDISABLEDCHILDREN
CRAIGA. DURFEYFOUNDEROFP.R.D.D.C.
U.S. HOUSEOFCONGRESSH2404 - HONORINGCRAIGDURFEYFORHISFIGHTAGAINSTAUTISM Ms. LORETTASANCHEZof California.
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CREC-2003-03-27/pdf/CREC-2003-03-27.pdf newwebsitesocialemotionalpaws.org
Towhomit mayconcern.
1 Temeculaschoolboardjoinslawsuitagainstsocial
mediagiants
2 SusanaBarrios
From: CraigADurfey <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, July17,
To: CraigADurfey; [email protected]; PublicComment; [email protected]; [email protected]; Supervisor JaniceHahn (FourthDistrict); [email protected]; [email protected] Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] Fwd: Californiaschooldistrictsfilelawsuitoversocialmedia Warning: Thisemailoriginatedfrom outsidetheCity of Anaheim. Donotclicklinksor open attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.
Forwardedmessage ---------
From: CraigA Durfey <
Date: Mon, Jul17, 2023at7:50PM
Subject: Fwd: Californiaschooldistrictsfilelawsuitoversocialmedia To: AssemblymemberDavies <[email protected]>, AssemblymemberFong [email protected]>, AssemblymemberQuirk-Silva <assemblymember.quirk- [email protected]>, COB_Response <[email protected]>, CraigA Durfey < [email protected]>, JimTortolano < NormaGarcia
[email protected]>, PIODepartment <[email protected]>, PublicRecordsRequest [email protected]>, TheresaBass <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, [email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> Forwardedmessage ---------
From: CraigDurfey <
Date: Mon, Jul17, 2023at7:44PM
Subject: Californiaschooldistrictsfilelawsuitoversocialmedia To: CraigDurfey < NickDibs < ChristopherAguilera
[email protected]>, GabrielaMafi <[email protected]>, JimTortolano TeresaPomeroy <[email protected]>, PublicRequest
[email protected]>, BobHarden <[email protected]>, DinaNguyen <[email protected]>, Lan Nguyen <[email protected]>, PamHaddad <[email protected]>, WalterMuneton [email protected]>
https://abc7ny.com/amp/social-media-lawsuit-school-district-san-mateo-county-schools-students/12967487/ SentfrommyiPhone
1 SusanaBarrios
From: KayBoatman <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, July
To: PublicComment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] meetingJuly17RE: CharterSchoolProject Warning: Thisemailoriginatedfrom outsidetheCity of Anaheim. Donotclicklinksor open attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.
MyvoterisNOforaCharterSchoolat2780EWagner – CoveChurch
Virus-free.www.avg.com
1 SusanaBarrios
From: TheresaBass
Sent: Monday, July17, 202310:16PM
To: PublicComment
Subject: FW: \[EXTERNAL\] LEDStreetlightsAreNotFDAApproved Attachments: UnapprovedLEDStreetlights - Anaheim, CA.pdf From: MarkBaker <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, July12, 202312:32PM
To: TheresaBass <[email protected]>
Cc: CityManager <[email protected]>; RudyEmami <[email protected]>; ADA <[email protected]>; AshleighAitken <[email protected]>; CityAttorney <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: \[EXTERNAL\] LEDStreetlightsAreNotFDAApproved
Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropenattachments unlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.
DearCityClerk, Anaheim, California,
Pleasefind attachedour publiccommentsregardingLEDstreetlightswhichhavenot beenFDA approved. Pleaseforwardto the city council.
Sincerely,
MarkBaker
President
SoftLightsFoundation
www.softlights.org
[email protected]
1 1 of 2
9450 SW Gemini Drive
PMB 44671
Beaverton, OR 97008
July 12, 2023
BY EMAIL
Robert Fabela, City Attorney
Anaheim, California
cityattorneysoffice@anaheim. net
Re: LED Streetlights Lack FDA Approval
Dear Robert Fabela,
An LED streetlight is an electronic product which is regulated by the US Food and Drug Administration. The FDA presentation “ How to Get Your Electronic Product on the U. S. Market” details the authority of the FDA to regulate the radiation from electronic products and the requirements of manufacturers to receive FDA approval for their electronic products that emit radiation. 1 The city of Anaheim, California has installed or is considering installing LED streetlights.
However, the FDA has not approved any LED streetlight products to ensure the comfort, health, and safety of the public. The FDA is mandated by the 1968 Radiation Control for Health and Safety Act ( 21 U. S.C. 360ii) to publish performance standards for electronic products that emit radiation, and yet the FDA has failed to comply with 21 U. S.C. 360ii for LED products, including LED streetlights.
LED streetlights are a human health hazard which have been documented to cause seizures, migraines, anxiety, nausea, eye pain, and eye injury. In addition, artificial light at night has been documented to cause significant increases in risk for mood disorders, diabetes, heart disease, breast cancer, and early mortality. It is likely that LED streetlights have increased acts of misbehavior and violence. The contact person at the FDA is Robert Ochs, Director, FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health, OHT8 ( robert. ochs@fda. hhs. gov).
It is negligent for a city to install or operate an electronic product that has no FDA approval, and which is known to put the public at risk of harm. In order to pursue a claim against a public entity under California Government Code section 835, a person must show: ( 1) that the property was owned or controlled by a public entity at the time of the incident; ( 2) the property was in a dangerous condition at the time of the injury; ( 3) the injury was proximately caused by the dangerous condition; ( 4) the dangerous condition created a reasonably foreseeable risk of injury; and ( 5) that there was a negligent or wrongful act or omission within the scope of employment of the public entity’ s employee that created the dangerous condition or the public entity had actual or constructive notice of the dangerous 1 https:// www. fda. gov/ media/ 88417/ download
2 of 2
condition. 2 ( Moncur v. City of Los Angeles, Dept. of Airports ( 1977) 68 Cal. App. 3d 118; Gov. Code §§ 830( a)-( c), 835. 2.). The installation or operation of LED streetlights meets the criteria for negligence and liability.
To protect the public from LED visible radiation and to avoid liability, a city must not install or operate LED streetlights in public spaces. To recover expenses related to the removal of any existing LED streetlights, the Soft Lights Foundation recommends that Anaheim sue the FDA and the DOE for failing to disclose to Anaheim that LED products are a human health hazard and for failing to comply with 21 U. S.C 360ii and publish the required performance standards for LED streetlights.
In any case, Anaheim must not install or operate LED streetlights knowing that the LED streetlights have not been FDA approved, knowing that the LED streetlights are causing serious adverse health impacts, knowing that LED streetlights are creating discriminatory barriers, and knowing that LED streetlights are defective and dangerous.
Sincerely,
s/ Mark Baker
President
Soft Lights Foundation
mbaker@softlights. org
cc:
City Manager – CityManager@anaheim. net
Public Works - REmami@anaheim. net
ADA Coordinator – ADA@anaheim. net
Mayor – aaitken@anaheim. net
City Clerk - tbass@anaheim. net
2 https:// leginfo. legislature. ca. gov/ faces/ codes_ displaySection. xhtml? lawCode= GOV& sectionNum= 835.
SusanaBarrios
From: MeganHarbert <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, July18,
To: PublicComment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] AnaheimPlanningCommissionCharterSchoolProjectat2780East Wagner.
Warning: Thisemailoriginatedfrom outsidetheCity of Anaheim. Donotclicklinksor open attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.
HelloAnaheimCityCouncilsMembers,
I amwritingthisemailas a currentresidentof District5 anda parentof twosmallchildren. Pleaselistento theresidents' concernsandreconsidertheconditionalusepermitthattheAnaheimPlanningCommissionapprovedfor theCharter SchoolProjectat 2780EastWagner.
Beforethemeeting, I reachedoutto my District5 representative, CommissionerWalker, aboutmyconcerns. In myemail, I sharedhowourneighborhoodonlyhasonewayto enterandexit, whichwill begreatlyimpactedby the480+ students proposedat thissite. I alsosharedmy concernoverthelackof plansin placeto ensurethesafetyof pedestrians attemptingto crossthepropertyduringdrop-off andpick-up. I receivednoresponse.
I alsoparticipatedin publiccommentduringthemeeting, whereI keptmy concernsstrictlyto zoningandlanduse, within thescopeof thePlanningCommission. Thequality of theproposedCharterSchool's services/programsshouldnothave beena factorin thedecision-makingprocessof theCommissioners.
I wasdeeplytroubledby thecommentsofferedby oneof theCommissionersbeforetheirvote, whichwerealongthelines of "If I hadschool-agekids, I thinkI wouldliketheideaof havingmorechoices" and "I liketheirshirts" regardingthe brandedt-shirtstheschooldistributedto familiesthatattendedtheirotherlocationoutsideof Anaheim.
Pleasehelprightthiswrongandallowthevoicedconcernsto beconsidered. Pleasedon't let thePlanningCommissioners be distractedby theperipherals.
Sincerely,
MeganHarbert
1 SusanaBarrios
From: marlonabermole.com <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday,
To: PublicComment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] CharterschoolonWagner
Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropenattachmentsunlessyou recognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.
DearMayorandCouncilmembers:
IrespectfullyrequestthatyouappealthedecisionoftheplanningcommissionregardingthecharterschoolonWagner.
Yourgeneralplancallsforlowdensityresidentialinthatlocation. Alessintensiveusewouldbeabetterfit forthisquiet, lowdensityneighborhood. Moreover, aschoolwithover450studentsareapublicsafetyconcerntotheentire neighborhood. PleasereconsiderthedecisionmadebytheplanningcommissiononMondayevening. Asacity, twice before, youhavedeclinedafarlessintensiveuseonthisproperty. Twicebefore, thecitysaidnotoschoolprojectswith halfthenumberofstudentsrequested.
Thankyouforyourreconsideration.
MarloNaber
Marjanneighborhood
SentfrommyiPhone
1