24. Table 5.10-1 (Consistency of the Project with the General Plan)

Excerpt from Final SEIR No. 352 Section 5.10 (Land Use and Planning), updated per Final SEIR No. 352 Section 3.0, Corrections, Clarifications and Additions to Draft Subsequent EIR.

TABLE 5.10-1

CONSISTENCY OF THE PROJECT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN
City of Anaheim General Plan Goal or Policy Consistency Analysis Land Use Element
Goal 1.1 Preserve and enhance the
quality and character of
Anaheim’s mosaic of
unique neighborhoods.

Consistent. The underlying purpose of the Project is to allow continued, long-term growth of The Disneyland Resort Project, approved by the City in 1993, by allowing the transfer of previously approved theme park, hotel, and other retail, dining and entertainment use s to other Disney Properties in the Project Site to support a fully integrated, multi- day vacation destination. The Project would limit development immediately adjacent to existing residential neighborhoods through
compliance with height restric tions, landscape requirements, and setback requirements as detailed in Section 3.0, Project Description, and discussed in Section 5.1, Aesthetics.

Therefore, the Project would be compatible with surrounding neighborhoods and would not detract from their qu ality and character.

Policy 1 Actively pursue
development standards
and design policies to
preserve and enhance the
quality and character of
Anaheim’s many
neighborhoods.

Policy 2 Ensure that new
development is designed in
a manner that preserves
the quality of life in existing
neighborhoods.

Goal 3.1 Pursue land uses along
major corridors that
enhance the City’s image
and stimulate appropriate
development at strategic
locations.

Consistent. As discussed previously in Section 3.0, Project Description, of this Draft Subsequent EIR, the Project Site is located along several major circulation routes including Katella Avenue and Harbor Boulevard, which are designated as the Central Core of The Anaheim Resort. Consistent with the intent of the original DRSP and ARSP, the Project would facilitate the development of visitor -
serving uses, the majority of which
would front onto major transportation corridors. All development and redevelopment would comply with development standards and design guidelines set forth in the DRSP and, as applicable, the ARSP, to maintain a consistent image throughout the Project Site and surrounding areas.

Policy 3 Ensure quality
development along
corridors through
adherence to established
development standards
and Community Design
Element goals, policies and
guidelines.

Consistent. Development along roadways (corridors) would be subject to the Design Plans of the DRSP and ARSP, which promote visual continuity throughout the Project Site through the use of development standards and design guidelines, landscaping, street furniture, signage, lighting, color, and other visual elements.

TABLE 5.10-1

CONSISTENCY OF THE PROJECT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN

City of Anaheim General Plan Goal or Policy Consistency Analysis Policy 4 Continue to pursue
additional open space,
recreation, and
landscaping amenities
along major transportation
routes.

Consistent. Although the Project does not designate any areas for open space or recreation, there are requirements for landscaping along all major roadways within The Anaheim Resort. All new development or redevelopment would be
subject to the development standards and design guidelines set forth in the DRSP or ARSP, as applicable.

Goal 3.2 Maximize development
opportunities along
transportation routes.

Consistent. The Project Site is located along several major circulation routes including Katella Avenue and Harbor
Boulevard, which are designated as the Central Core of The Anaheim Resort. Consistent with the intent of the original DRSP and ARSP, the Project would fa cilitate the development of visitor-serving uses, the majority of which would front onto major transportation corridors that which are served by the Anaheim Transportation Network (ATN), which provides shuttle service access to a variety of Resort uses destinations as well as the Anaheim Amtrak/Metrolink train and bus services at the Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center (ARTIC).

Policy 1 Where appropriate,
designate land adjacent to
freeways, proposed Bus
Rapid Transit stops and
Metrolink stations for
employment intensive land
uses.

Goal 4.1 Promote development that
integrates with and
minimizes impacts to
surrounding land uses.

Consistent. All future development within the Project Site would be subject to development standards and design
guidelines set forth in the DRSP and ARSP. The Project would involve the transfer of previously approved uses under The Disneyland Resort Project to other a reas of the DRSP and Disney ARSP Properties. The Project would expand upon the current land use pattern within the Project Site, providing a more integrated and cohesive development. The location and density of future land uses would be determined based on compatibility with on-site and surrounding land uses. The Project would potentially introduce new land uses adjacent to off-site residential areas, including along Walnut Street and south and east of the Southeast District and Theme Park East Overlay. EIR No. 311 concluded that development adjacent to existing land uses would result in a significant and unavoidable impact related to land use compatibility. However, in addition to the design of the Project as discussed in Section 5.1,
Aesthetics, which requ ires adherence to setbacks and height restrictions as detailed in Table 5.1- 1, Modifications to the Anaheim Commercial Recreation Area Maximum Permitted
Structural Height Map and the DRSP and ARSP Zoning and
Development Standards, the Project would implem ent
development standards and design guidelines as set forth in the DRSP and ARSP to minimize impacts between these land uses.

The DRSP and ARSP include policies and methods for
establishing and maintaining a unified resort identity, which would help to ensure compatibility. Also, “setback realm areas” have been incorporated into the Project, which include
enhanced landscaping to ensure future compatibility with surrounding areas as buildout of the Project occurs (City of Anaheim 2022c). Compliance with the se development
standards and design guidelines would reduce impacts to less than significant levels related to land use compatibility, which would be a reduction in impact from the impact analysis in EIR No. 311.

Policy 1 Ensure that land uses
develop in accordance with
the Land Use Plan and
Zoning Code in an effort to
attain land use
compatibility.

Policy 2 Promote compatible
development through
adherence to Community
Design Element policies
and guidelines.

Policy 3 Ensure that developers
consider and address
project impacts upon
surrounding
neighborhoods during the
design and development
process.

Policy 4 Require new or expanded
uses to provide mitigation
or buffers between existing
uses where potential
adverse impacts could
occur.

TABLE 5.10-1

CONSISTENCY OF THE PROJECT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN

City of Anaheim General Plan Goal or Policy Consistency Analysis Goal 5.1 Create and enhance
dynamic, identifiable
places for the benefit of
Anaheim residents,
employees and visitors.

Consistent. As stated previously, future development within the Project Site would be subject to development standards and design guidelines set forth in the DRSP or ARSP as well as The Anaheim Resort Identity Program and The Anaheim Resort
Public Realm Landscape Program, as applicable. Specifically, development along the major transportati
on corridors would
include a variety of visitor -serving uses with generous sidewalks, landscaping, and street furniture to accommodate pedestrians within The Anaheim Resort. The Project’s system of sidewalks provides easy access to a variety of land uses within and adjacent to The Disneyland Resort and the Disney ARSP Properties. In addition to the enhanced pedestrian areas, The Anaheim Resort is also served by the Anaheim
Transportation Network (ATN) , which provides access to a variety of resort uses and the Anaheim Amtrak/Metrolink train and bus services at the ARTIC.

Additionally, Disney would continue to implement and
administer a Transportation Demand Management (TDM)
program for all cast members and continue to participate in the Anaheim Transportation Network (ATN). The Project would continue to implement a variety of TDM program strategies and elements for both existing and future cast member commute options, including, but not limited to, ridesharing, vanpooling, transit passes, commuter busses, and shuttle services.

Policy 1 1) Encourage mixed -use
and commercial
development that provides:
a) Safe, protected places
for pedestrians to walk;
b) Attractive surroundings;
c) Opportunities for social
interaction;
d) Comfortable places to sit
and relax; and
e) Interplay between the
interior uses of buildings
and outdoor activities, such
as sidewalk cafes or
tastefully designed outdoor
merchandise displays.

Policy 4 Promote development that
is efficient, pedestrian-
friendly, and served by a
variety of transportation
options.

Goal 6.1 Enhance the quality of life
and economic vitality in
Anaheim through strategic
infill development and
revitalization of existing
development.

Consistent. Buildout of the Project Site would provide for a variety of uses specific to The Disneyland Resort, including theme park and hotel uses, and parking areas. Due to the largely developed nature of the Project Site, the majority of development would consist o f either redevelopment or infill development. All future development would be subject to development standards and design guidelines set forth in the DRSP or, as applicable, the ARSP for Disney ARSP Properties, to ensure quality development. Th
e Project would allow the
continued development of a visitor -serving district as established by The Disneyland Resort Project and the ARSP Project. Allowable land uses include a balance of visitor-serving uses including hotel, theme park, and related commercial, retail, and restaurant uses. Continued development associated with the Project would enhance the role of the Disneyland Resort as a strong economic base for the City by attracting visitors who, in turn, support other local businesses and help the growth of the economy.

TABLE 5.10-1

CONSISTENCY OF THE PROJECT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN

City of Anaheim General Plan Goal or Policy Consistency Analysis Circulation Element
Goal 1.1 Provide a comprehensive
multimodal transportation
system that facilitates
current and long-term
circulation of people and
goods in and through the
City.

Consistent. As part of The Disneyland Resort Project and the ARSP Project, the circulation system around The Anaheim Resort was improved to facilitate movement of vehicles and pedestrians around The Anaheim Resort. The Project supports alternative transportation mod es through provision of bicycle parking, pedestrian infrastructure, transit support, and TDM measures. Bicycle parking is provided for cast members at key locations throughout The Disneyland Resort and would
continue to be installed as required b y the City. The Project proposes installation of at least one and up to three pedestrian bridges over Harbor Boulevard in conjunction with construction of a parking structure and potential relocation of the transit center, and provides a network of pedestr ian paths and sidewalks throughout The Anaheim Resort to provide easy access to a variety of land uses within and adjacent to the Resort area. The Project also proposes up to two additional pedestrian bridges or crossings over Disneyland Drive.

Development along the major transportation corridors would include a variety of visitor -serving uses with generous sidewalks, landscaping, and street furniture to accommodate pedestrians within The Anaheim Resort. In addition to the enhanced pedestrian areas, The Ana heim Resort is also
served by the ATN, which provides access to a variety of land uses and the Anaheim Amtrak/Metrolink train and bus services at the ARTIC.

Additionally, Disney would continue to implement and
administer a TDM program for all cast members. The Project would continue to implement a variety of TDM program
strategies and elements for both existing and future cast member commute options, including , but not limited to, ridesharing, vanpooling, transit passes, commuter busses, and shuttle services.

Additionally, the Project includes several circulation
improvements which are detailed Table 19 (Recommended
Intersection Improvements and 20 (Other Transportation
Improvements) of the Operational Traffic Analysis for the DisneylandForward Project, included as Appendix J-2).

Feasible Intersection Improvements
• Harbor Boulevard and Disney Way: Add westbound
left turn lane, restripe westbound through lane to
share westbound through/right turn lane and eliminate
north leg crosswalk
• Harbor Boulevard and Katella Avenue: Re- program
the traffic signal to double-service the westbound turn lane to reduce westbound turn lane queuing
• Harbor Boulevard and Orangewood Avenue: Add
northbound turn lane and southbound turn lane
• Clementine Street and Katella Avenue: Add
southbound turn lane
Policy 3 Require that major new
development proposals
include traffic impact
analyses that identify
measures and financing to
mitigate traffic impacts.

Policy 6 Ensure the provision of
needed transportation
improvements through the
site plan and
environmental review
process.

TABLE 5.10-1

CONSISTENCY OF THE PROJECT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN

City of Anaheim General Plan Goal or Policy Consistency Analysis • Anaheim Boulevard/Haster Street and Katella
Avenue: Lengthen southbound turn lane and
westbound turn lane pockets to accommodate queues
Operational Improvement Funding
• Harbor Boulevard and Ball Road
• Harbor Boulevard and Katella Avenue
• Harbor Boulevard and Orangewood Avenue
• Anaheim Boulevard and Ball Road
• Anaheim Boulevard/Haster Street and Katella
Avenue
Other Improvements
 Installation of a pedestrian signal on Walnut Street at Magic Way
 Installation of Class I Bike Path with a single two-way, off-street, shared- use pathway for pedestrians and
bicycles with a minimum width of 10 feet 1 on the east
side of Walnut Street from Ball Road to Katella Avenue
 Installation of (1) a Class I Bike Path with a minimum width of 10 feet on the north side of Disney Way
between Anaheim Boulevard2 and Clementine Street;
(2) a Class I Bike Path with a minimum width of 10
feet on the west side of Clementine Street between
Alro Way and Disney Way; and (3) a bike parking
facility in the East Parking Area and/or Parking
Overlay
 Provision in -lieu contribution and dedicate ROW
adjacent to the Project Site on Ball Road and Haster
Street for proposed Class II Bicycle Lanes on those
streets
 Installation of traffic signal control at the existing driveway to the Southeast District on Haster Street
south of Katella Avenue3
 Installation of traffic signal control at the intersection of Manchester Avenue/Clementine Street and Alro Way4
 Construction of at least one and up to three pedestrian bridges
over Harbor Boulevard north of Disney Way
and south of Manchester Avenue with public access
to/from the sidewalk on Harbor Boulevard
 Widen Katella Avenue to four westbound lanes along
Disney’s property adjacent to the Theme Park District

1 Where utility relocations are not feasible, the pathway may include brief sections with a minimum width of 8 feet. 2 The portion between Anaheim Boulevard and the I- 5 southbound off-ramp is under Caltrans jurisdiction. Disney and the City would work with Caltrans to approve and implement this Bike Path. 3 This action would be subject to a traffic signal warrant analysis. 4 This action would be subject to a traffic signal warrant analysis.

TABLE 5.10-1

CONSISTENCY OF THE PROJECT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN

City of Anaheim General Plan Goal or Policy Consistency Analysis from Disneyland Drive to approximately 800 feet west
of Harbor Boulevard
 Widen Katella Avenue to four eastbound lanes along
Disney’s property adjacent to the Southeast District
(from approximately 700 feet west of Clementine
Street to approximately 400 feet east of Clementine
Street)
Moreover, Construction Traffic Management and Trip
Reduction Plans would be developed prior to approval of any grading or demolition plans for the Project.

Policy 9 Consider aesthetics,
including the provision of
appropriate landscaping, in
the development of arterial
highways.

Goal 2.1 Maintain efficient traffic
operations on City streets
and maintain a peak hour
level of service not worse
than D at street
intersections.

Consistent. In accordance with the City of Anaheim Criteria for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies, the Project was evaluated for any effects on the existing and future circulation system. Where intersection deficiencies were identified, the Project is responsi ble for either implementing for contributing its fair share to feasible improvements as described in the analysis under Circulation Element Goal 1.1, above. Policy 1 Make improvements to streets and intersections
experiencing conditions
worse than the applicable
Level of Service standard
by providing appropriate
improvements, including,
but not limited to:
• Landscaped median
islands to restrict left
turns, with median
opening spacing
occurring a minimum
of 400 feet apart, and
preferably limited to
signalized locations.
• Adequate driveway
spacing of 125 feet (at
30 mph) to 230 feet (at
45 mph) between
driveways on arterial
highways.

TABLE 5.10-1

CONSISTENCY OF THE PROJECT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN

City of Anaheim General Plan Goal or Policy Consistency Analysis Policy 3 Install new warranted
signals as funding permits,
with minimum preferred
spacing of 1,000 feet apart.

Consistent. Based on review of forecasted traffic conditions and in an effort to improve traffic capacity and smooth traffic flow, the Project would install traffic signal control at: 1) the existing driveway to the Southeast District on Haster Street south of Katella Avenue subject to a traffic signal warrant; and 2) the intersection of Manchester Avenue/Clementine Street and Alro Way subject to a traffic signal warrant.

Goal 2.2 Provide a safe circulation
system.

Consistent. The Project would not involve the construction of any new roadways, nor would the Project involve any new geometric design features that would have the potential to substantially increase hazards. Also, the Project does not propose any new uses that would be incompatible with the existing transportation system or with other nearby land uses as the Project proposes to redistribute previously approved uses on Disney Properties in the Project Site.

The Project directly supports a safe circulation system through the provision of the East Esplanade transit center west of Harbor Boulevard to locate bus and shuttle loading off -street.

The Project would construct a parking facility in the East Parking Area, at which time it would construct at least one and up to three pedestrian bridges north of Disney Way and south of Manchester Avenue to connect the east side of Harbor Boulevard with the Theme Park District and to separate
pedestrians from vehicle traff ic. The Project proposes to abandon the public rights-of-way in Magic Way between Walnut Street and Disneyland Drive, in Clementine Street between Katella Avenue and the southern property line of the proposed Southeast District of the DRSP, previously dedicated by Disney to the City, and in Hotel Way north of Disney Way. Additionally, the Project would install a pedestrian signal across Walnut Street at Magic Way. All Project access points would be designed to City standards and would be reviewed and
approved by the Department of Public Work s for safe design and operation.

As stated previously, development along the major
transportation corridors would include a variety of visitor - serving uses with generous sidewalks, landscaping, and street furniture to accommodate pedestrians within The Anaheim Resort. The Project’s system of sidewalks provides easy access to a variety of land uses within and adjacent to The Anaheim Resort. In addition to the enhanced pedestrian areas, The Anaheim Resort is also served by ATN
, which provides
access to a variety of uses and the Anaheim Amtrak/Metrolink train and bus services at the ARTIC.

Policy 1 Promote the principle that
streets have multiple uses
and users, and protect the
safety of all users.

Policy 2 Discourage high speed,
through traffic on local
streets with appropriate
traffic calming measures
(e.g., traffic enforcement,
bulb-outs, lane striping,
chokers, etc.).

Policy 3 Design access onto major
arterial streets in an orderly
and controlled manner.

Policy 4 Promote common
driveways and reduce curb
cuts along arterial
highways to minimize
impacts to traffic flows.

Policy 5 Minimize disruptions to
traffic and
pedestrian/bicycle flow.

Policy 6 Implement street design
features such as the use of
medians, bus turnouts,
consolidated driveways
and on street parking
prohibitions to minimize
mid-block traffic
congestion.

Policy 7 Implement street design
features that discourage
through traffic intrusion on
residential streets.

Policy 10 Provide adequate sight
distances for safe vehicular
movement on roadways, at
intersections and at
driveways.

TABLE 5.10-1

CONSISTENCY OF THE PROJECT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN

City of Anaheim General Plan Goal or Policy Consistency Analysis Goal 5.1 Promote bus service and
paratransit improvements.

Consistent. As stated previously, development along the major transportation corridors would include a variety of visitor- serving uses with generous sidewalks, landscaping, and street furniture to accommodate pedestrians within The Anaheim Resort. The Project’s system of sidewalks provides easy access to a variety of land uses within and adjacent to The Anaheim Resort. In addition to the enhanced pedestrian areas, The Anaheim Resort is also served by ATN , which provides access to a variety of uses and the Anaheim Amtrak/Metrolink train and bus services at the ARTIC.

Additionally, Disney would continue to implement and
administer a TDM program for all cast members and continue to participate in the Anaheim Transportation Network (ATN).

The Project would continue to implement a variety of TDM program strategies and elements for both existing and future cast member commute options, including, but not limited to, ridesharing, vanpooling, transit passes, commuter busses, and shuttle services. Disney also would continue to participate in a clean fuel shuttle program.

The Disneyland Resort is served by multiple bus lines and Disney provides bus and shuttle stops at the East Esplanade transit center west of Harbor Boulevard. Also, The Disneyland Resort is designed to accommodate people with all levels of mobility, providing accessibility for wheelchair users and people pushing strollers.

Policy 3 Support transit supportive
land uses in new
development.

Policy 5 Intensify land uses in close
proximity to future BRT
stop(s) where appropriate.

Policy 6 Improve pedestrian access
to transit facilities.

Goal 7.1 Protect and encourage
bicycle travel.

Consistent. The Project would not impact any existing bicycle lanes. The Construction Management Plan that would be
prepared prior to approval of any demolition or grading for the Project would include details on the maintenance of bicycle and pedestrian facilities during construction and connectivity through the Project Site, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

Bicycle parking is provided for cast members at key locations throughout The Disneyland Resort and would continue to be installed as required by the City and Disney’s TDM program.

The Project would implement the following bicycle circulation improvements:
 Installation of Class I Bike Path with a single two-way, off-street, shared- use pathway for pedestrians and
bicycles with a minimum width of 10 feet on the east
side of Walnut Street from Ball Road to Katella
Avenue;
 Installation of (1) a Class I Bike Path with a minimum width of 10 feet on the north side of Disney Way
between Anaheim Boulevard5 and Clementine Street;
(2) a Class I Bike Path with a minimum width of 10
feet on the west side of Clementine Street between
Alro Way and Disney Way; and (3) a bike parking
facility in the East Parking Area and/or Parking
Overlay; and
Policy 2 Incorporate bicycle
planning into the traditional
transportation planning
process.

Policy 3 Support and implement
bicycle routes that
minimize cyclist/motorist
conflicts.

5 The portion between Anaheim Boulevard and the I -5 southbound off-ramp is under Caltrans jurisdiction. Disney and the City would work with Caltrans to approve and implement this Bike Path.

TABLE 5.10-1

CONSISTENCY OF THE PROJECT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN

City of Anaheim General Plan Goal or Policy Consistency Analysis • Provide in -lieu contribution and dedicate ROW
adjacent to the Project Site on Ball Road and Haster
Street for proposed Class II Bicycle Lanes on those
streets.

Goal 8.1 Protect and encourage
pedestrian travel.

Consistent. All future development within the Project Site would be subject to development standards and design
guidelines set forth in the Design Plans for the DRSP and the ARSP, as applicable. Consistent with development within The Disneyland Resort and the ARSP are a to date, future
development would continue to focus on centralized parking facilities that connect to an integrated system of pedestrian- oriented pathways and walkways connecting to hotels, retail and dining, and theme parks. As detailed in t he Design Plans, landscaping, lighting, and complementary features such as pedestrian-friendly furnishings would be located along the walkways to provide an enhanced experience. From the
parking facilities and within the Project Site, pedestrian circulation would be directed to protected routes, or those that are physically separated from roadways and avoid street crossings. The Project would include at least one and up to three pedestrian bridges south of Manchester Avenue and north of Disney Way to provid e connection between the East Parking Area parking structure and the Theme Park District without impeding traffic flow. The Project also would include up to two additional pedestrian bridges or crossings over
Disneyland Drive between Magic Way and Katella Avenue. In addition to the enhanced pedestrian areas, the parking facilities would also be served by the Disney -
operated tram system,
providing direct access to retail and dining areas and theme parks. Implementation of these pedestrian improvements would encourage motorists to park their vehicles and travel by foot throughout The Anaheim Resort (i.e., park once and walk to the other destinations).

With the removal of the planned extensions of Clementine Street and Gene Autry Way, future sidewalks along those streets would also be eliminated from the General Plan. Despite the closure of Magic Way, pedestrian connectivity would be maintained from Ball Road and Katella Avenue to the Theme Park District and between Walnut Street, Disneyland Drive, Harbor Boulevard and the Theme Park District.

Future development within the Project Site would be subject to specific development standards intended to enhance the
pedestrian experience with a focus on accessibility and safe passage.

Policy 1 Encourage and improve
pedestrian facilities that
link development to the
circulation network and that
serve as a transition
between other modes of
travel.

Policy 2 Improve pedestrian and
bicycle connections from
residential neighborhoods
to retail activity centers,
employment centers,
schools, parks, open space
areas and community
centers.

Policy 5 Add raised, landscaped
medians, and bulbouts,
where appropriate, to
reduce exposure to cross
traffic at street crossings.

Policy 6 When appropriate,
walkways should include
pedestrian amenities such
as shade trees and/or
plantings, trash bins,
benches, shelters, and
directional kiosks.

Policy 7 Ensure that streets and
intersections are designed
to provide visibility and
safety for pedestrians.

Policy 10 Require commercial
developments to provide
specific pedestrian access
points independent from
auto entrances.

Goal 9.1 Provide carpooling and
vanpooling opportunities
for commuters.

Consistent. Disney would continue to implement and
administer a TDM program for all cast members and continue to participate in ATN. The Project would continue to implement a variety of TDM program strategies and elements for both existing and future cast member comm ute options, including, but not limited to, ridesharing, vanpooling, transit passes, commuter busses, and shuttle services. The Project’s TDM program also includes carpool/vanpool matching services for Policy 2 Continue to encourage
vanpooling for City
residents and workers.

Policy 4 Cooperate with public or
private providers of
vanpool services and
TABLE 5.10-1

CONSISTENCY OF THE PROJECT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN

City of Anaheim General Plan Goal or Policy Consistency Analysis publicize vanpool options
to residents.

Disney cast members and provides financial support and
incentives for participation.

Goal 12.1 Ensure adequate parking is
made available to City
residents, visitors, and
businesses.

Consistent. Parking associated with new development within the Project Site would be subject to existing parking
requirements set forth in Title 18 (Zoning) of the Anaheim Municipal Code and would be subject to review and approval by the City of Anaheim Planning Department.

The Project includes allowances for thousands of parking spaces for theme park guests, hotel guests, and cast members in various locations throughout the Project Site. The West Parking Area allows up to 16,700 parking spaces, the East Parking Area allows up to 17,600 spaces, the Future Expansion district allows up to 5,100 spaces, the Theme Park District allows up to 12,230 spaces, and the parking overlay at Harbor Cast Member Lot would allow up to 5,700 parking spaces.

Disney actively manages parking demand for guests and cast members and provides programs and financial incentives to encourage cast members not to drive a vehicle to The
Disneyland Resort. Disney parking facilities incorporate aesthetic design features and visual and acoustic screening to the City’s satisfaction and provide bicycle parking according to City requirements.

Policy 1 Assess the adequacy of
existing or proposed on-
and off -
street parking as
needed, especially in urban
and commercial areas, to
ensure that an adequate
supply is provided.

Policy 5 Encourage the use of well -
designed, aesthetically -
enhanced parking
structures as an alternative
to large, expansive surface
parking lots.

Consistent. Future development of parking areas, including parking structures, would be subject to requirements set forth in the Design Plans of the DRSP and ARSP, as applicable, intended to enhance the visual appearance of parking areas.

Specifically, the Design Plan s identify parking area design requirements including the location of parking areas to the rear or side of buildings, and development standards and design guidelines for parking structures to both enhance the exterior appearance of the parking structure and conceal views of cars inside the structures. The Design Plans also identify required setbacks from adjacent public street rights -of-way and require a minimum amount of landscaping within the setback areas, including large- scale materials planted accordin g the layered landscape principles details in the Design Plans.

Policy 6 Encourage businesses to
provide bicycle parking
facilities such as bike racks
and lockers to promote
bicycling.

Consistent. Bicycle parking is provided for cast members at key locations throughout The Disneyland Resort and would continue to be installed as required by the City and Disney’s TDM program. The Project would implement the following
bicycle circulation improvements:
 Installation of Class I Bike Path with a single two-way, off-street, shared- use pathway for pedestrians and
bicycles with a minimum width of 10 feet on the east
side of Walnut Street from Ball Road to Katella
Avenue;
 Installation of (1) a Class I Bike Path with a minimum width of 10 feet on the north side of Disney Way
between Anaheim Boulevard and Clementine Street;
(2) a single two-way, off -street, shared -use pathway
for pedestrians and bicycles with a minimum width of
10 feet on the west side of Clementine Street between
Alro Way and Disney Way; and (3) a bike parking
TABLE 5.10-1

CONSISTENCY OF THE PROJECT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN

City of Anaheim General Plan Goal or Policy Consistency Analysis facility in the East Parking Area and/or Parking
Overlay just north of the East Parking Area; and
• Provide in -lieu contribution and dedicate ROW
adjacent to the Project Site on Ball Road and Haster
Street for proposed Class II Bicycle Lanes on those
streets.

Green Element
Goal 3.1 Actively plan for the use of
utility easements as
recreational trails and open
space amenities.

Consistent. As part of the Project, Disney Way would be reclassified from a six-lane Major Arterial to a four-lane Primary Arterial (with no change to the width of the ultimate public right- of-way) to provide flexibility in the implementation of access for the East Parking Area.

The Project would also require approval of an amendment to the Circulation Element of the City of Anaheim General Plan and the Bicycle Master Plan to add new Bike Paths, as detailed previously under Goal 7.1, Policy 3, of the Circulation Element.

The Project is consistent with Goal 3.1 as the changes
discussed above will provide for bike access to a new bike parking facility in the DRSP East Parking Area and/or the ARSP Parking Overlay where there will be pedestrian access to Harbor Boulevard and the Theme Park District.

Goal 5.1 Continue Anaheim’s water
conservation efforts to
ensure that all City facilities
are water efficient.

Consistent. All future development associated with the Project would be subject to the City’s Water Conservation Ordinance, including the mandatory cuts authorized by Section 10.18.070 of the Ordinance, if needed, which would achieve substantial water use savings. In pursuit of environmental sustainability on the Project Site, Disney has successfully implemented various initiatives that go beyond compliance with federal, State and local environmental rules and regulations. As part of this Project, the following key water-conserving features would be incorporated:
 Use of high-efficiency light -emitting diode (LED)
indoor and outdoor lighting;
 Use of water-efficient landscaping, with no turf;
 Use of low-flow sprinkler heads in irrigation system;  Use of waterways re-circulation systems;
 Use of low -flow fittings, fixtures, and equipment,
including low flush toilets and urinals;
 Use of self-closing valves on drinking fountains;
 Use of reclaimed water for irrigation and washdown
when it becomes available;
 Continuation of the existing cooling tower recirculation system;
 Use of efficient irrigation systems such as drip
irrigation and automatic systems which use moisture
sensors;
Policy 3 Specify and install water -
conserving plumbing
fixtures and fittings in public
facilities such as parks,
community centers, and
government buildings.

TABLE 5.10-1

CONSISTENCY OF THE PROJECT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN

City of Anaheim General Plan Goal or Policy Consistency Analysis  Use of low-flow shower heads in hotels;
 Use of water -efficient ice machines, dishwashers,
clothes washers, and other water-using appliances;
 Use of irrigation systems primarily at night when
evaporation rates are lowest;
 Display of water conservation information to the public in conspicuous places;
 Use of water -conserving landscape plant materials
wherever feasible; and
 Use of vacuum and other equipment to reduce the
use of water for washdown of exterior areas.

Goal 5.2 Continue and expand
Anaheim’s educational
outreach and incentives
programs aimed at water
conservation.

Consistent. In pursuit of environmental sustainability on the Project Site, Disney has successfully implemented various initiatives that go beyond compliance with federal, State and local environmental rules and regulations. As part of this Project, Disney would continue to engage in water conservation efforts, including implementation of water conservation measures, efficiency and reuse and use of water -friendly landscaping. Disney would also continue to work with the Orange County Water District (OCWD) to develop a process for storing water instead of releasing it to the ocean through storm drains. When large bodies of water or water attractions are drained at the resort, the water is sent to the OCWD’s
Groundwater Replenishment System, where it is purified and added to Orange County’s groundwater supply.

Policy 3 Continue to encourage
landscape projects
employing water efficient
irrigation.

Goal 7.1 Reduce urban run -off from
new and existing
development.

Consistent. All future development associated with the Project would be required to comply with federal and State
requirements related to water quality, including the City’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Ordinance for construction and operati on. Further, future development projects would be required to prepare individual Water Quality Management Plans (WQMPs) that identify (1) the potential pollutants of concern that would be generated by the Project and (2) the site and hydrologic conditions of concern at downstream locations. The WQMP would identify permanent site design, source control, and treatment control best management practices (BMPs) that would be implemented as part of the Project, including maintenance responsibilities and funding s ources, and would be signed as a notarized
agreement between the City and the Property
Owner/Developer to provide a long- term commitment to its implementation. Preparation and implementation of a WQMP for new development would satisfy MS4 Permit requiremen ts and allow the City to comply with the water quality standards for storm water runoff.

Policy 1 Ensure compliance with
the Federal Clean Water
Act requirements for
National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) permits,
including developing and
requiring the development
of Water Quality
Management Plans for all
new development and
significant redevelopment
in the City.

Policy 2 Continue to implement an
urban runoff reduction
program consistent with
regional and federal
requirements, which
includes requiring and
encouraging the following:
 Increase permeable
areas and install
TABLE 5.10-1

CONSISTENCY OF THE PROJECT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN

City of Anaheim General Plan Goal or Policy Consistency Analysis filtration controls
(including grass lined
swales and gravel
beds) and divert flow
to these permeable
areas to allow more
percolation of runoff
into the ground;
 Use natural drainage,
detention ponds or
infiltration pits to
collect runoff; and,
 Prevent rainfall from
entering material and
waste storage areas
and pollution-laden
surfaces.

Policy 4 Require new development
and significant
redevelopment to utilize
site preparation, grading
and best management
practices that provide
erosion and sediment
control to prevent
construction-related
contaminants from leaving
the site and polluting
waterways.

Goal 8.1 Reduce locally generated
emissions through
improved traffic flows and
construction management
practices.

Consistent. Construction and operation related to the
implementation of the Project would generate emissions related to earth disturbance, construction activities, daily operational activities, and vehicular traffic. Adherence to South Coast Air Quality Management District Rules 402 and 403 would reduce fugitive dust emissions and Rule 1113 would reduce emissions associated with architectural coatings. Improvements to the circulation system would also reduce vehicular emissions through improved traffic flows and intersection wait time.

Policy 1 Reduce vehicle emissions
through traffic flow
improvements, such as
traffic signal
synchronization, Intelligent
Transportation Systems,
the Scoot Adaptive Traffic
Control System, and
related capital
improvements.

Policy 2 Regulate construction
practices, including
grading, dust suppression,
chemical management,
and encourage pre-
determined construction
routes that minimize dust
and particulate matter
pollution.

TABLE 5.10-1

CONSISTENCY OF THE PROJECT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN

City of Anaheim General Plan Goal or Policy Consistency Analysis Goal 9.1 Reduce single-occupancy
vehicle trips
Consistent. The Anaheim Resort, including the Project Site, is served by the ATN, which provides shuttle service among access to a variety of Resort destinations as well as uses and the Anaheim Amtrak/Metrolink train and bus services at the ARTIC. In addition to access to these transit options, Disney’s current TDM program also requires continued provision of bicycle parking and amenities; an online ride- matching and carpool/vanpool program; guaranteed trip return in the event of a personal emergency, unplanned business-related activity, or inclement weather for cyclists or walkers; incentives for using alternative travel modes; flex schedule and telecommuting; electric vehicle parking and incenti ves; shuttle services; and promotions, marketing, and education of the programs and incentives. Disney will also continue to participate in the ATN.

Additionally, the Project includes several transportation infrastructure improvements as discussed previously under Goal 1.1 of the Circulation Element.

The Project also would improve bicycle circulation and
amenities under Goal 7.1, Policy 3, above.

Policy 1 Encourage alternative work
schedules for public and
private sector workers.

Policy 2 Encourage development of
new commercial and
industrial projects that
provide on- site amenities
that help to lesson vehicle
trips such as on -site day
care facilities, cafeterias,
automated teller machines
and bicycle storage
facilities.

Policy 3 Encourage use of vanpools
and carpools by providing
priority parking through the
project design process.

Policy 4 Encourage bicycle and
pedestrian travel by
improving the City’s trail
and bikeway Master Plan
and by providing
convenient links between
the trail system and desired
destinations.

Goal 11.1 Encourage land planning
and urban design that
support alternatives to the
private automobile such as
mixed-
use, provision of
pedestrian amenities, and
transit-oriented
development.

Consistent. The Disneyland Resort Project proposes parking structures on the west and east sides of the Resort so guests traveling to the Resort park their vehicles and then use mass transit or pedestrian amenities to circulate throughout the Resort. Additionally, d evelopment along the major
transportation corridors would include a variety of visitor - serving uses with generous sidewalks, landscaping, and street furniture to accommodate pedestrians within The Anaheim Resort. The Project’s system of sidewalks provides easy access to a variety of land uses within and adjacent to The Anaheim Resort. In addition to the enhanced pedestrian areas, The Anaheim Resort is also served by the ATN, which provides access to a variety of uses and the Anaheim Amtrak/Metrolink train and bus services at the ARTIC. This continued provision of pedestrian access throughout The Anaheim Resort provides opportunities for visitors to access the surrounding are a and
patronize local commercial and retail uses.

Additionally, all future development pursuant to the DRSP and the ARSP would be in accordance with the General Plan
Commercial Recreation land use designation, which is intended to provide for tourist and entertainment-related industries, such as theme par ks, hotels, tourist-oriented retail, movie theaters, and other visitor-serving facilities.

Policy 1 Encourage commercial
growth and the
development of
commercial centers in
accordance with the Land
Use Element.

TABLE 5.10-1

CONSISTENCY OF THE PROJECT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN

City of Anaheim General Plan Goal or Policy Consistency Analysis Goal 14.1 Conserve natural habitat
and protect rare,
threatened and
endangered species.

Consistent. The Project would be subject to State law
concerning migratory birds and/or nesting raptors when habitat is present which would ensure that no significant impacts would occur.

Goal 15.2 Continue to encourage site
design practices that
reduce and conserve
energy.

Consistent. Future development associated with the Project would incorporate energy -saving practices as detailed in the DRSP and ARSP, including use of energy -saving equipment and other high-efficiency systems. As discussed in Section 3.0, Project Description, of this
Draft Subsequent EIR, The
Disneyland Resort has successfully implemented various
initiatives that go beyond compliance with federal, State and local environmental rules and regulations. In particular, Disney has reduced fossil fuel consumption, focused on using cleaner, renewable energy sources, and engaged in water conservation efforts, all of which have contributed to annual reductions in air pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions, and promoted more responsible resource use. These initiatives would cont
inue to
be applied as part of Project buildout.

Policy 1 Encourage increased use
of passive and active solar
design in existing and new
development (e.g.,
orienting buildings to
maximize exposure to
cooling effects of prevailing
winds and locating
landscaping and landscape
structures to shade
buildings).

Goal 16.1 Continue to monitor and
improve the Anaheim
Recycle program.

Consistent. The Disneyland Resort and Disney -owned ARSP properties are currently and would continue to be served by independent waste haulers. Additionally, the City of Anaheim maintains a comprehensive recycling program with the goal of reducing solid waste by 50 per
cent. Anaheim Waste Disposal
provides all recovered recyclable residential and commercial waste to a hauling facility where recyclable materials are sorted. As discussed in Section 3.0, Project Description, Disney has successfully implemented various initiatives that go beyond compliance with federal, State and local environmental rules and regulations, including:
• Each year, Disney’s Property Control department
collects and repurposes over one million pounds of
company assets that the company no longer needs.

These include theme park props, décor, furniture, and
appliances removed during refurbishments. The
assets are reused internally, offered to cast members
and/or donated to local charities;
• Disney maintains a recycling program that has grown
into a comprehensive resort-wide effort, both onstage
and backstage. Over 25 different commodities are
collected at the resort for recycling, including
cardboard, paper, plastics, glass, metal, food waste,
green waste and construction debris. With these
efforts, Disney diverts more than 30 million pounds of
materials from landfill annually; and
• Since launching a food scraps program in 2013,
Disney continues to make great strides in reducing
and recovering food waste. Today, this program
diverts over five million pounds of food waste from
landfills annually. In 2019, participation expanded
throughout the resort to include locations in food and
beverage service areas, storefronts, and office
buildings. This program has been recognized by
Policy 2 Provide adequate solid
waste collection and
recycling for commercial
areas and construction
activities.

TABLE 5.10-1

CONSISTENCY OF THE PROJECT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN

City of Anaheim General Plan Goal or Policy Consistency Analysis external groups multiple times, including most recently by the U.S. EPA Food Recovery Challenge in 2020.

The Walt Disney Company has also identified the following goals related to sustainability:

Waste
 Zero waste to landfill for wholly owned and operated
parks and resorts
Materials
 Use recycled, certified, or verified sustainable paper  At least 30 percent recycled plastic in products and
packaging
 Design packaging for reuse, recycling, or composting
 Use of recycled content or sustainable textiles for
apparel
 Sustainable production processes for products
Sustainable Design
 New projects achieve near net zero, maximize water
efficiencies and are designed to support zero waste
operations
 90 percent diversion for construction waste for
domestic and European Union projects
The Project would also incorporate the following key features:
 Use of recycled paper products for stationery,
letterhead, and packaging;
 Recovery of materials such as: food scraps,
cardboard, recyclables, landscape material, kitchen
grease, scrap metal and many other recoverable
materials that align with our zero-waste goal; and
 Continued participation in the City of Anaheim’s
voluntary “Recycle Anaheim” program or other
substitute program as may be developed by the City.

As discussed in Section 5.16, Utilities and Service Systems, Disney would continue to implement its solid waste diversion program to reduce the amount of solid waste being transported to the landfill. The Project also would comply with local statutes and regulations related to waste reduction.

Goal 17.1 Encourage building and
site design standards that
reduce energy costs.

Consistent. As discussed in Section 3.0, Project Description, Disney has successfully implemented various initiatives that go beyond compliance with federal, State and local environmental rules and regulations, including:
• An early focus of Disney’s environmentally -focused
culture, Disneyland Railroad steam trains and the
Mark Twain Riverboat were converted in 2009 to be
fueled with 99.9 percent biodiesel made from used
Policy 1 Encourage designs that
incorporate solar and wind
exposure features such as
daylighting design, natural
TABLE 5.10-1

CONSISTENCY OF THE PROJECT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN

City of Anaheim General Plan Goal or Policy Consistency Analysis ventilation, space planning
and thermal massing.
kitchen cooking oil, replacing the 200,000+ gallons of
petroleum diesel fuel previously used every year to
fuel those attractions;
• In 2016, Cars Land received a 40,000-square-foot
photovoltaic system (solar array) atop the Radiator
Springs Racers attraction;
• In 2016, Disney successfully completed a ten- year
diesel minimization plan through which Disneyland
Finding Nemo submarines were re-powered with zero
emission technology, diesel- fueled construction light
towers were replaced with solar light towers, and
diesel-fueled pressure washers were replaced with
propane or electric units. This initiative reduced
Disney’s diesel fuel consumption by nearly 90 percent;
• Since 2014, Disney has deployed over 400 electric
vehicle charging ports for guests and cast members,
and intends to continue growing its EV -charging
infrastructure;
• Over the years, Disney has placed considerable
emphasis on reducing water consumption through
various conservation measures, efficiency and reuse.

In 2019, Disney used less potable water than in 2009,
all while serving many more guests;
• Disney manages its irrigation based on changing
weather conditions using an on- site weather system
comprised of satellite irrigation controllers around the resort. The weather system’s features include drip
irrigation, flow sensors and cut off valves, soil moisture sensors and water -friendly planting, among other
features;
• Disney worked with the Orange County Water District
(OCWD) to develop a process for storing water
instead of releasing it to the ocean through storm
drains. When large bodies of water or water
attractions are drained at the resort, the water is sent to the OCWD’s Groundwater Replenishment System,
where it is purified and added to Orange County’s
groundwater supply;
• Each year, Disney’s Property Control department
collects and repurposes over one million pounds of
company assets that the company no longer needs.

CONSISTENCY OF THE PROJECT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN

City of Anaheim General Plan Goal or Policy Consistency Analysis efforts, Disney diverts more than 30 million pounds of
materials from landfill annually; and
Since launching a food scraps program in 2013, Disney
continues to make great strides in reducing and recovering food waste. Today, this program diverts over five million pounds of food waste from landfills annually. In 2019, participation expanded throughout the resort to include locations in food and beverage service areas, storefronts, and office buildings. This program has been recognized by external groups multiple times, including most recently by the U.S. EPA Food Recovery Challenge in 2020. Additionally, future development within the Project Site would be required to demonstrate that future development meet the applicable Title 24 Energy Efficiency Standards and the applicable California Green Building
Standards (24 CCR 11). Adherence to these requir ements would comply with Goal 17.1 and the associated policy.

Public Services and Facilities Element
Goal 1.1 Provide sufficient staffing,
equipment and facilities to
ensure effective fire
protection, emergency
medical and rescue
services, permitting and
fire inspection, and
hazardous material
response services that
keep pace with growth.

Consistent. Implementation of the Project would allow the transfer of previously approved uses to Disney Properties throughout the Project Site, as detailed in Section 3.0 of this Subsequent EIR. No new uses are proposed, however,
previously approved uses could occur in different locations and configurations within the Project Site. These changes have the potential to alter existing access routes and the anticipated density of development in certain areas. The Project would also result in changes to the interface with off-site properties through the introduction of different types of development to new areas, including along the Project Site’s boundaries. As discussed in Section 5.13, Public Services, construction of a new substation in the Theme Park District would reduce this impact to less than significant. The Project also would continue to pay applicable fees.

Policy 1 Maintain adequate
resources to enable the
Fire Department to meet
response time standards,
keep pace with growth, and
provide high levels of
service.

Policy 3 Maintain and/or upgrade
water facilities to ensure
adequate response to fire
hazards.

Consistent. The Project Site is served by local water lines owned and maintained by the City of Anaheim. EIR No. 311 and SEIR No. 340 previously identified certain improvements to the water system that were required to accommodate
buildout of The Disneyland Resort and the Disney -owned properties in the ARSP. As of November 2022, all required improvements have been fully constructed and are operational.

These improvements are detailed in Table 5.16-2, Constructed Water Improvements, in Section 5.16, Utilitie
s and Service
Systems, of this Draft Subsequent EIR. Additionally, as discussed in Section 5.13, Public Services, and required through implementation of identified mitigation, Disney is responsible for payment of all required fees associated with funding public services, including fees related to fire protection and emergency response resources.

Goal 2.1 Meet the community’s
needs for public safety and
law enforcement by
ensuring adequate
resources for the
Consistent. Implementation of the Project would reallocate previously approved uses to other Disney Properties within the Project Site, as detailed in Section 3.0, Project Description, of this Draft Subsequent EIR. As detailed in Section 5.13, Public Services, the Pro ject would result in additional demand TABLE 5.10-1

CONSISTENCY OF THE PROJECT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN

City of Anaheim General Plan Goal or Policy Consistency Analysis prevention, detection, and
investigation of crime, and
response to calls for
service.
requiring new facilities, potential for expanding current facilities, additional staffing, and additional equipment . This increase in demand for police protection services could create a potentially significant impact. Construction of a police substation in the Theme Park District and a Satellite Office in the Southeast District or the Theme Park East Overlay, all of which are within the defined development footprint for the DisneylandForward Project, would reduce this impact to less than significant. Addit ionally, Disney would continue to pay applicable fees for police protection services.

Policy 1 Maintain adequate
resources to enable the
Police Department to meet
response time standards,
keep pace with growth, and
provide high levels of
service.

Goal 4.1 Provide a water system
that produces high quality
water, sufficient water
pressure, and necessary
quantities of water to meet
domestic demands
Consistent. As discussed in Section 5.16, Utilities and Service Systems, the estimated buildout water supply requirement for the Project is projected to be 4,012 acre-feet per year. This is approximately 6.0 percent of the total City supply requirement estimated for 2045 in the City’s 2020 Urban Water
Management Plan. The Water Supply Assessment prepared for the Project and discussed in more detail in Section 5.16, Utilities and Service Systems, indicates that the City would have adequate water supplies to meet demands during normal, single-dry, and multiple-dry years to 2045 (Psomas 2022). The Project would comply with mitigation identified in Section 5.16, Utilities and Service Systems,
requiring water conservation
measures to be incorporated into future landscape plans to help conserve the water supply. As discussed in Section 3.0, Project Description, The Disneyland Resort has also successfully implemented various initiatives that ensure compliance with the City’s Water Conservation Ordinance, as go beyond
compliance with federal, State and local environmental rules and regulations, including:
• Over the years, Disney has placed considerable
emphasis on reducing water consumption through
various conservation measures, efficiency and reuse.

In 2019, Disney used less potable water than in 2009,
all while serving many more guests; and
• Disney manages its irrigation based on changing
weather conditions using an on- site weather system
comprised of satellite irrigation controllers around the resort. The weather system’s features include drip
irrigation, flow sensors and cut off valves, soil moisture sensors and water -friendly planting, among other
features.

The Project would also incorporate the following key features:
 Use of water-efficient landscaping, with no turf;
 Use of low-flow sprinkler heads in irrigation system;  Use of waterways re-circulation systems;
 Use of low -flow fittings, fixtures, and equipment,
including low flush toilets and urinals;
 Use of self-closing valves on drinking fountains;
Policy 1 Provide for the efficient and
economic distribution of
adequate water supply and
pressure to all residential,
commercial, industrial, and
public areas served by the
Public Utilities Department.

Policy 2 Continue to provide
municipal water service
that meets or exceeds
State and Federal health
standards and monitor
water quality according to
established criteria, with
respect to health
standards.

Policy 3 Examine and utilize the use
of alternative water
supplies, such as grey
water and reclaimed water,
where appropriate and
feasible.

TABLE 5.10-1

CONSISTENCY OF THE PROJECT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN

City of Anaheim General Plan Goal or Policy Consistency Analysis  Use of reclaimed water for irrigation and washdown
when it becomes available;
 Continuation of the existing cooling tower recirculation system;
 Use of efficient irrigation systems such as drip
irrigation and automatic systems which use moisture
sensors;
 Use of low-flow shower heads in hotels;
 Use of water -efficient ice machines, dishwashers,
clothes washers, and other water-using appliances;
 Use of irrigation systems primarily at night when
evaporation rates are lowest;
 Display of water conservation information to the public in conspicuous places;
 Use of water -conserving landscape plant materials
wherever feasible;
 Use of vacuum and other equipment to reduce the use
of water for washdown of exterior areas; and
 Consultation with the City energy -conservation
experts for assistance with energy -conservation
design features.

Goal 5.1 Provide a safe and
effective sewer system that
meets the needs of the
City’s residents,
businesses, and visitors.

Consistent. The Project Site is served by local sewer lines owned and maintained by the City of Anaheim. As detailed previously, EIR No. 311 and SEIR No. 340 identified certain improvements to the sewer system that were required to
accommodate buildout of The Disneyla nd Resort and the
Disney ARSP Properties. As of November 2022, all required improvements have been fully constructed and are operational.

These improvements are detailed in Section 5.16, Utilities and Service Systems, in Table 5.16-
3, Constructed Sewer
Improvements.

As detailed in Section 3.0, Project Description, the Project would allow Disney to move previously approved uses to other Disney Properties within the Project Site; no additional square footage for theme park uses or retail entertainment uses or additional hotel rooms are proposed as part of this Project.

Nevertheless, demand for sewer infrastructure would occur in areas currently used as surface parking lots, which would create a potentially significant impact. Implementation of mitigation detailed in Se ction 5.16, Utilities, would mitigate potential impacts to less than significant.

Policy 1 Ensure that appropriate
sewer system mitigation
measures are identified
and implemented in
conjunction with new
development based on the
recommendations of prior
sewer studies and/or future
sewer studies that may be
required by the City
Engineer.

TABLE 5.10-1

CONSISTENCY OF THE PROJECT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN

City of Anaheim General Plan Goal or Policy Consistency Analysis Goal 6.1 Maintain a storm drain
system that will adequately
protect and enhance the
health, safety and general
welfare of residents,
visitors, employees, and
their property.

Consistent. As part of the buildout of The Disneyland Resort under current entitlements, a private storm drain system has been constructed and improved to accommodate continued
development and redevelopment of the Project Site.

Implementation of structural source control best management practices (BMPs) that are detailed in the Master WQMP
prepared for The Disneyland Resort continue to ensure long- term water quality enhancement. As detailed in Section 5.16, Utilities and Service Systems, b ecause no developm ent not already anticipated by EIR No. 311 and SEIR No. 340 is
proposed, increased stormwater flows are not anticipated.

Additionally, because all required improvements have been constructed to serve The Disneyland Resort as analyzed in EIR No. 311 and the Disney ARSP Properties as analyzed in SEIR No. 340, upgrades to the existing infrastructure system are not anticipated, and would not be required to implement the Project. However, although the overall amount of future development associated with the Proj ect would remain
unchanged, the Project has the potential to increase impervious surfaces within different areas of the Project Site, which could increase runoff volumes and rates to certain facilities. However, the City requires that individual developments provide
engineering plans as well as drainage studies and Preliminary WQMPs specifying methods to convey, retain, and treat storm water, which would ensure that storm water runoff from the Project Site would not increase the risk of flooding or exceed the capacity of downstream drainage systems. Disney is
responsible for payment of all required fees associated with funding of storm drain improvements, including construction of necessary improvements to the off -site storm drain system, when it develops the Disney ARSP Properties. Therefore, with implementation of site-
specific storm drain improvements the
Project would not result in impacts related to deficiencies in the off-
site storm drainage system serving the Project Site In
addition, any storm drain, sewer, and street improvement plans would be designed and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

Policy 1 Improve the City’s storm
drain system to address
current deficiencies as well
as long-term needs
associated with future
development to minimize
flood damage and
adequately convey rainfall
and subsequent runoff
from a 25- year frequency
storm.

Policy 3 Minimize the amount of
impervious surfaces in
conjunction with new
development.

Goal 7.1 Minimize, recycle and
dispose of solid and
hazardous waste in an
efficient and
environmentally sound
manner.

Consistent. As discussed in Section 3.0, Project Description, and Section 5.16, Utilities and Services Systems, The
Disneyland Resort has successfully implemented various
initiatives that go beyond compliance with federal, State and local environmental rules and regulations, including:
• Each year, Disney Property Control department
collects and repurposes over one million pounds of
company assets that the company no longer needs.

TABLE 5.10-1

CONSISTENCY OF THE PROJECT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN

City of Anaheim General Plan Goal or Policy Consistency Analysis green waste and construction debris. With these
efforts, Disney diverts more than 30 million pounds of
materials from landfill annually; and
• Since launching a food scraps program in 2013,
Disney continues to make great strides in reducing
and recovering food waste. Today, this program
diverts over five million pounds of food waste from
landfills annually. In 2019, participation expanded
throughout the resort to include locations in food and
beverage service areas, storefronts, and office
buildings. This program has been recognized by
external groups multiple times, including most recently by the U.S. EPA Food Recovery Challenge in 2020.

The Walt Disney Company has also identified the following goals related to sustainability:

Continued implementation of these initiatives would support the City’s attainment of solid waste reduction goals, including TABLE 5.10-1

CONSISTENCY OF THE PROJECT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN

City of Anaheim General Plan Goal or Policy Consistency Analysis compliance with AB 939 and SB 1838 requiring reduction in organic waste to reduce the overall amount of solid waste being transported to the landfill system.

Goal 8.1 Coordinate with private
utilities to provide adequate
natural gas and
communications
infrastructure to existing
and new development in a
manner compatible with
the surrounding
community.

Consistent. As appropriate, Disney would be responsible for coordination with private utility companies prior to and during construction to ensure adequate service to the proposed development project(s) and to avoid any loss of service to the surrounding community.

Goal 9.1 Provide a dependable fiber
optics system that meets
existing and future needs.

Consistent. AT&T would continue to serve the Project Site, providing telephone, digital cable, and high- speed internet services. The infrastructure capacity for telephone service typically expands with new development. Facilities needed to connect the Project to the e xisting telephone system may include new conduit, fiber and copper facilities. These improvements would be implemented in accordance with
applicable State and local regulations. Any new systems would be consistent with current technologies, whether or not that includes a fiber -
optics system, as identified in Goal 9.1, or
alternative and higher technology. The Project would be consistent with the intent of this Goal and related policy.

Goal 10.1 Improve the City’s
appearance by mitigating
the visual impacts of utility
equipment and facilities.

Consistent. As detailed in both the DRSP and ARSP as well as Chapters 18.114 and 18.116 of the Anaheim Municipal
Code, development standards and design guidelines are
provided to effectively screen utilities and back -of-house uses from public view. Service areas, stor age areas, utility meters and other equipment would be concealed from view through use of landscaping; architectural elements including walls and fences; utility undergrounding; and locating these uses in an internal, side, or rear yard.

Policy 2 Use a combination of
architectural
enhancements, equipment
undergrounding, screen
walls and landscaping to
reduce or eliminate
visibility of utility equipment
and facilities, whenever
feasible.

TABLE 5.10-1

CONSISTENCY OF THE PROJECT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN

City of Anaheim General Plan Goal or Policy Consistency Analysis Growth Management Element
Goal 1.1 Provide a balance of
housing options and job
opportunities throughout
the City.

Consistent. Although the goals of the Project are not directly tied to the provision of housing, future development of the Project would create approximately 39,375 new jobs
associated with total buildout the Project and, as discussed in Section 5.12, Population and Housing, with 13,853 additional jobs added by the Project. These numbers would not be a substantial quantity of the jobs that are anticipated to exist in the region. Similarly, at the City level, the quantity of new jobs that would be staffed by local resid ents is minor when compared to the overall number of residents and overall number of jobs that are projected within the City. Furthermore, the Project would increase the demand for housing (1,842 dwelling units) within the City and add population (6,079 persons); however, the population increase would represent

1.5 percent of the projected population in the City by 2045 and the increased demand for housing would be within the housing projections for the City.

Policy 3 Ensure a balance of retail,
office, industrial and
residential land uses to
enhance the economic
base of the City when
considering land use
changes.

Consistent. The Project would allow the continued
development of a visitor -serving district as established by The Disneyland Resort Project and the ARSP Project. Allowable land uses include a balance of visitor -serving uses including hotel, theme park, and related com mercial, retail, and restaurant uses. These uses are intended to support a strong economic base by attracting visitors to the City who would support other local businesses. Policy 5 Continue and enhance the City’s comprehensive
program of business
attraction, promotion and
retention.

Goal 1.4 Develop land use
strategies and incentives to
reduce the amount of
vehicle miles traveled
within the City.

Consistent. Continued development of the Project Site would enhance the pedestrian experience by providing a variety of land uses within walking distance and along primary pedestrian corridors, thereby reducing the total vehicle miles traveled.

Future development within the Project Site would include hotel uses adjacent to the existing and future theme park uses, and pedestrian pathways would be provided to facilitate walking and non-
passenger car travel for both employees and
visitors/patrons, to a greater extent than would be the case for similar development in outlying areas not adjacent to the Disneyland area or areas without transit availability.

Additionally, Disney would continue to implement a TDM
program, as discussed in Section 5.14, Transportation , which is designed to reduce VMTs from cast members driving to and from The Disneyland Resort. Disney will also continue to participate in a clean fuel shuttle program.

Policy 4 Encourage employment
centers to provide support
uses and services such as
restaurants, retail uses,
child-care facilities, shuttle
services to shopping areas,
etc., in order to reduce
potential vehicle trips.

Goal 2.1 Reduce traffic congestion
on the City’s arterial
highway system.

Consistent. Pursuant to SB 743 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b), VMT is the method for measuring and addressing vehicular circulation system facilities under CEQA.

Analysis of LOS is no longer the metric for determining transportation environmental impacts pursuant to CEQA.

However, the LOS analysis is required to determine general consistency with the General Plan Circulation Element, as described previously.

TABLE 5.10-1

CONSISTENCY OF THE PROJECT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN

City of Anaheim General Plan Goal or Policy Consistency Analysis The Project includes several circulation improvements that would be implemented in conjunction with the Project as discussed previously under Goal 1.1, Policies 3 and 6 of the Circulation Element.

Policy 4 Continue to maintain
consistency between the
City and County Master
Plan of Arterial Highways.

Consistent. As discussed previously under Goal 7.1 of the Circulation Element, the Project would require the approval of an amendment to the Orange County MPAH. Given that the
Project includes the amendment of the MPAH, the Project would not conflict with the MPAH once OCTA approves the proposed amendment to the MPAH.

Policy 5 Promote the use of public
transportation and
alternative modes of
transportation by
increasing access to public
transit, including Bus Rapid
Transit, through land use
planning (e.g., locating
higher density residential
projects near
transportation corridor s),
ensuring direct and
convenient pedestrian
access to public transit
stops, implementing
bicycle routes,
encouraging pedestrian-
friendly developments, and
supporting High
Occupancy Vehicle (HOV)
lanes.

In addition to the enhanced pedestrian areas, The Anaheim Resort is also served by the ATN, which provides access to a variety of uses and the Anaheim Amtrak/Metrolink train and bus services at the ARTIC.

Policy 7 Improve traffic flow by
reducing the number of
curb cuts and encourage
driveway consolidation
along arterial highways in
conjunction with future
development.

Consistent. As discussed previously under Goal 2.2 of the Circulation Element, the Project supports a safe circulation system through the provision of the East Esplanade transit center west of Harbor Boulevard to locate bus and shuttle loading off-street. The Project will construct a parking facility in the East Parking Area, at which time it would construct at least one and up to three pedestrian bridges over Harbor Boulevard north of Disney Way and south of Manchester Avenue to
connect the east side of Harbor Boulevard with the Theme Park District and to separate pedestrians from vehicle traffic. These project elements as well as the continued use of the Mickey and Friend and Pixar Pals parking structures would centralize vehicular parking with access points along arterial highways.

Goal 2.2 Evaluate the traffic -related
impacts of proposed
developments and/or
intensification of existing
land uses and address said
impacts.

Consistent. Pursuant to SB 743 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b), VMT is the method for measuring and addressing vehicular circulation system facilities under CEQA.

Analysis of LOS is no longer the metric for determining transportation environmental impacts pursuant to CEQA.

However, the LOS analysis is required to determine general consistency with the General Plan Circulation Element, as described previously. Policy 1 Continue to review
development projects to
ensure traffic -related
TABLE 5.10-1

CONSISTENCY OF THE PROJECT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN

City of Anaheim General Plan Goal or Policy Consistency Analysis impacts are addressed
appropriately.

With implementation of mitigation identified in Section 5.14, Transportation, which includes continued implementation of Disney’s existing TDM program and continued participation in a clean fuel shuttle program , the Project’s impact related to VMT would be reduced to less than significant levels.

Nevertheless, the Project includes several circulation
improvements as discussed previously under Goals 1.1 and 2.1 of the Circulation Element.

Policy 4 Prior to issuing building
permits for new
development forecast to
generate 100 or more peak
hour (morning or evening)
trip ends, require traffic
impact analyses be
completed that identify
arterial and intersection
improvements that may
potentially be needed to
provide no worse than LOS
E along Int erstates/State
Routes/Smart Streets
(unless current operation is
LOS F), and not worse than
LOS D along the balance of
the arterials on the City’s
Circulation Element that
are measurably impacted
by the new development
and are under the City’s
jurisdiction.

Policy 5 Require development
projects that exceed LOS
standards beyond
acceptable levels to
provide necessary
improvements and/or
funding to mitigate said
impacts, if determined
necessary by the City.

Safety Element
Goal 1.1 Minimize the risk to public
health and safety and
disruptions to vital
services, economic vitality,
and social order resulting
from seismic and geologic
activities.

Consistent. As discussed in Section 5.6, Geology and Soils, all impacts related to the development of the Project would be reduced to a less than significant level through construction pursuant to current building codes and standards. Additionally, the Project Site is not located within an earthquake hazard zone and all related seismic impacts would be less than significant.

Policy 1 Minimize the risk to life and
property through the
identification of potentially
hazardous areas,
adherence to proper
construction design
criteria, and provision of
public information.

TABLE 5.10-1

CONSISTENCY OF THE PROJECT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN

City of Anaheim General Plan Goal or Policy Consistency Analysis Goal 3.1 Reduce, to the greatest
extent possible, the risk to
life, property, public
investment, and social
order created by flood
hazards.

Consistent. The Project Site is located within the 100 -Year (with flooding below 1 foot) to 500-Year Flood Zone and within the general limits of the flood impact zones associated with Prado Dam failure. Implementation of the Project may
potentially expose more people and habitable structures to potential flooding. However, development of structures in compliance with local, State, and federal regulations, including compliance with the Cobey-Alquist Floodplain Management Act requirements and State of Califor nia Model Ordinance as set forth in the City of Anaheim General Plan, would ensure that significant impacts would not occur.

Policy 1 Evaluate all development
proposals located in areas
that are subject to flooding
to minimize the exposure of
life and property to
potential flood risks.

Goal 4.1 Decrease the risk of
exposure for life, property
and the environment to
hazardous materials and
hazardous waste.

Consistent. As discussed in Section 5.8, Hazards and
Hazardous Materials, all development within areas of known hazardous materials releases or spills would be subject to remediation prior to construction of any new structure.

Additionally, all development and redevel opment would be subject to regulations regarding handling of materials
containing asbestos and/or lead based paint or development in areas subject to historic pesticide and/or herbicide use, effectively reducing potential impacts to a less than significant level.

Policy 2 Promote the proper
handling, treatment and
disposal of hazardous
materials and hazardous
waste.

Policy 3 Encourage businesses to
utilize practices and
technologies that will
reduce the generation of
hazardous wastes at the
source.

Policy 4 Implement Federal, State
and local regulations for the
disposal, handling, and
storage of hazardous
materials.

Noise Element
Goal 1.1 Protect sensitive land uses
from excessive noise
through diligent planning
and regulation.

Consistent. As detailed in Section 5.11, Noise, of this Subsequent EIR, implementation of the Project has the
potential to impact noise sensitive land uses during both construction and daily operation. Construction activities would be performed consistent with the Cit y’s Municipal Code requirements; however, these impacts are considered
significant and unavoidable, even with implementation of the mitigation measures identified. Nevertheless, consistent with the General Plan goal and policies in question, th e Project’s noise study has provided recommendations regarding site planning and mitigation measures that would help to protect sensitive land uses and to ensure noise compatibility with nearby uses to the extent feasible.

Policy 2 Continue to enforce
acceptable noise
standards consistent with
health and quality of life
goals and employ effective
techniques of noise
abatement through such
means as a noise
ordinance, building codes,
and subdivision and zoning
regulations.

TABLE 5.10-1

CONSISTENCY OF THE PROJECT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN

City of Anaheim General Plan Goal or Policy Consistency Analysis Policy 3 Consider the compatibility
of proposed land uses with
the noise environment
when preparing, revising or
reviewing development
proposals.

With regard to operational noise, future development projects would be required to comply with several mitigation measures which would reduce noise exposure levels related to HVAC systems, loading docks, and parking structures. In Section

5.11, Noise, several mitigation measures are included requiring noise studies be prepared and noise monitoring performed to demonstrate that noise- sensitive receptors would not be significantly impacted by Project operations and to confirm compliance with the City’s Sound Level Pressure Ordinance.

Policy 5 Encourage proper site
planning and architecture
to reduce noise impacts.

Policy 7 Require site -specific noise
studies be conducted by a
qualified acoustic
consultant utilizing
acceptable methodologies
while reviewing the
development of sensitive
land uses or development
that has the potential to
impact sensitive land uses.

Goal 2.1 Encourage the reduction of
noise from transportation-
related noise sources such
as motor vehicles, aircraft
operations, and railroad
movements.

Consistent. Based on noise modeling data, the addition of project-related traffic would not create a significant change in the existing volume of traffic noise and the Project would not cause a significant impact regarding traffic noise. Also, adherence to the development standards and design guidelines related to architectural elements and landscaping would assist in reducing noise levels at uses proposed adjacent to
roadways. Policy 3 Require that development
generating increased traffic
and subsequent increases
in the ambient noise level
adjacent to noise-sensitive
land uses provide
appropriate mitigation
measures.

Goal 3.1 Protect residents from the
effects of “spill over” or
nuisance noise emanating
from the City’s activity
centers.

Consistent. As discussed above with regard to operational noise, future development projects would be required to comply with several mitigation measures detailed in Section 5.11, Noise, which would reduce noise exposure levels related to Project operations, includin g noise from HVAC systems, loading docks, and parking structures.

Construction activities would be performed consistent with the City’s Municipal Code requirements. Additionally, identified mitigation measures would include placement of an 8-foot-high perimeter or portable construction barrier along boundaries of construction areas which have noise- sensitive land use adjacent to them to minimize noise impacts as well as use of properly maintained mufflers on all construction equipment. As discussed, this impact, although consistent with City Code and reduced through implementation of mitigation measures, would continue to result in a significant and unavoidable, temporary impact.

Policy 1 Discourage new projects
located in commercial or
entertainment areas from
exceeding stationary -
source noise standards at
the property line of
proximate residential or
commercial uses, as
appropriate.

Policy 3 Enforce standards to
regulate noise from
construction activities.

Particular emphasis shall
be placed on the restriction
of the hours in which work
other than emergency work
TABLE 5.10-1

CONSISTENCY OF THE PROJECT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN

City of Anaheim General Plan Goal or Policy Consistency Analysis may occur. Discourage
construction on weekends
or holidays except in the
case of construction
proximate to schools where
these operations could
disturb the classroom
environment.

Policy 4 Require that construction
equipment operate with
mufflers and intake
silencers no less effective
than originally equipped.

Policy 5 Encourage the use of
portable noise barriers for
heavy equipment
operations performed
within 100 feet of existing
residences or make
applicant provide evidence
as to why the use of such
barriers is infeasible.

Economic Development Element
Goal 1.1 Continue and expand the
City’s marketing and
promotional campaign.

The Project would allow the continued development of a visitor- serving district as established by The Disneyland Resort Project and the ARSP Project. Allowable land uses include a balance of visitor-serving uses including hotel, theme park, and related commercial, retail, and restauran t uses. Continued development associated with the Project would enhance the role of The Disneyland Resort as a strong economic base for the City by attracting visitors who, in turn, support other local businesses and help the growth of the economy.

Policy 1 Continue to market
Anaheim as a business -
friendly city and implement
the following strategies to
promote the City’s special
activity areas and
neighborhoods:
 Continue to market
the Anaheim
Convention Center as
a showcase for the
community and an
opportunity for new
and existing
businesses to
network.
 Market The Anaheim
Resort, Angel
Stadium of Anaheim,
The Grove Theater
and the Arrowhead
Pond of Anaheim as
major entertainment
amenities for local
regional and national
businesses.
 Promote The Platinum
Triangle as a unique
TABLE 5.10-1

CONSISTENCY OF THE PROJECT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN

City of Anaheim General Plan Goal or Policy Consistency Analysis and special urban
place where a wide
variety of people
come together to
work, live, shop and
recreate.
 Promote Downtown
Anaheim/Colony as
the cultural, artistic,
historic and civic
center of the City.
 Continue to promote
Anaheim Canyon as a
high profile, business
center in Orange
County.
 Promote West and
East Anaheim as
areas with emerging
high quality housing
and retail
opportunities.

Community Design Element
Goal 1.1 Create an aesthetically
pleasing and unified
community appearance
within the context of distinct
districts and
neighborhoods.

Consistent. As previously discussed, all future development within the Project Site would be required to comply with the development standards and design guidelines set forth as the Design Plans in Section 5 of the DRSP or ARSP, as applicable.

Specifically, the Design
Plans promote an aesthetically
pleasing sense of visual continuity in the public and setback realms through use of landscaping, street furniture, signage, lighting, color palette, and other pageantry elements.

The Central Core of the ARSP, defined by major corridors Harbor Boulevard and Katella Avenue, would be subject to specific development standards and design guidelines
intended to create a coherent, unique resort identity that reinforces the image of The Anaheim Resort as a high-quality destination resort and improve the aesthetic character of The Anaheim Resort by visually defining the boundaries with appropriate landscape treatmen ts. Specific requirements regarding the placement, design, size, massing, and general appearance of signs are detailed throughout both the ARSP and DRSP, as well as Chapters 18.114.130 and 18.116.160 of the Anaheim Municipal Code.

Moreover, future development and redevelopment associated with the Project would create greater visual unity and
complement the visual appearance of the area. Although the existing visual character of individual areas may be changed, the Project would crea te a more visually cohesive and
appealing environment.

Policy 4 Pursue unifying
streetscape elements for
major corridors, including
coordinated streetlights,
landscaping, public
signage and street
furniture, to reinforce
Anaheim’s community
image.

TABLE 5.10-1

CONSISTENCY OF THE PROJECT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN

City of Anaheim General Plan Goal or Policy Consistency Analysis Policy 5 Identify and
preserve/enhance view
corridors for major
landmarks, community
facilities, and natural open
space in the planning and
design of all public and
private projects.

Consistent. As discussed in Section 5.1, Aesthetics, the Project Site does not contain any designated scenic resources, nor are any scenic vistas visible from the Project Site; therefore, no impact would occur. As discussed previously, the Project would continue development along the Central Core of the ARSP, consistent with development standards and design
guidelines detailed throughout both the ARSP and DRSP, as well as Chapters 18.114 and 18.116 of the Anaheim Municipal Code.

Policy 7 Screen public and private
facilities and above-ground
infrastructure support and
equipment, such as
electrical substations, and
water wells and recharge
facilities, with appropriately
scaled landscaping or
other methods of
screening.

Consistent. Pursuant to screening requirements set forth in Chapter 18.46 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, public facilities structures and infrastructure would be subject to screening requirements such as decorative walls, fences, and/or
landscaping to conceal them from view. Further, Section 5, Design Plan, of the DRSP or ARSP, as applicable, provides requirements for concealing building equipment including utility equipment, pipes, vents, and air conditioners. As new
construction progresses, all aboveground power lines would be undergrounded with the exception of existing SCE transmission lines.

Policy 8 Construct public and
private facilities and
support structures (e.g.,
water pipes, irrigation and
electrical controls, vents) to
blend with the surrounding
environment.

Policy 9 Minimize visual impacts of
public and private facilities
and support structures
through sensitive site
design and construction.

This includes, but is not
limited to: appropriate
placement of facilities;
undergrounding, where
possible; and aesthetic
design (e.g., cell tower
stealthing).

Goal 2.1 Attractively landscape and
maintain Anaheim’s major
arterial corridors and
prepare/ implement
distinctive streetscape
improvement plans.

Consistent. The Central Core of the ARSP, defined by major corridors Harbor Boulevard and Katella Avenue, would be subject to specific development standards and design
guidelines intended to create a coherent, unique resort identity that reinforces the image of The Anaheim Resort as a high- quality destination resort and improve the aesthetic character of The Anaheim Resort by visually defining the boundaries with appropriate landscape treatmen
ts. Specific requirements
regarding the placement, design, size, massing, and general appearance of signs are detailed throughout both the ARSP and DRSP, as well as Chapters 18.114.130 and 18.116.160 of the Anaheim Municipal Code.

Policy 4 Ensure adherence to sign
regulations, which address
issues of scale, type,
design, materials,
placement, compatibility,
and maintenance for uses
along freeways, toll roads
and major arterial
corridors.

TABLE 5.10-1

CONSISTENCY OF THE PROJECT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN

City of Anaheim General Plan Goal or Policy Consistency Analysis Housing Element
Guiding Principle D Sustainable design and the
efficient utilization of
resources create more
livable neighborhoods and
can have both
environmental and
financial benefits.

Consistent. Implementation of the Project would result in the development of a mix of visitor -serving uses including hotels, theme parks, and related retail/dining/entertainment uses, all of which would serve to improve the attractiveness and vitality of The Anaheim
Resort. Although the Project does not propose
construction of residential neighborhoods, the Project Site is located close to existing neighborhoods. The Project would limit development immediately adjacent to existing residential neighborhoods through compliance with height restrictions, landscape requirements, and setback requirements as detailed in Section 3.0, Project Description and discussed in Section

5.1, Aesthetics. Further, the Project would include provision of development that is walk able and pedestrian -
friendly, which
would enhance local opportunities for retail and dining, as well as employment, within walking distance of existing
neighborhoods in the local area. Therefore, the Project would be compatible with surrounding neighborhoods and would not detract from their quality and character.

Policy Strategy #3: Housing Quality and
Design Strategy
Consistent. The underlying purpose of the Project is to allow continued, long-term growth of The Disneyland Resort Project, approved by the City in 1993, by allowing the transfer of previously approved uses to Disney Properties within the Project Site to support a fully integrated, multi-d ay vacation destination. The Project involves the buildout of entitled uses within The Disneyland Resort previously evaluated in EIR No. 311, as well as Disney ARSP properties as currently entitled and previously evaluated in EIR No. 313 and SEIR No. 340.

The Project would expand upon the current land use pattern within the Project Site, providing a more integrated and cohesive development. The location and density of future land uses would be determined based on compatibility with on- site and surrounding l and uses. The Project would limit
development immediately adjacent to existing residential neighborhoods through compliance with height restrictions, landscape requirements, and setback requirements as detailed in Section 3.0, Project Description, and disc
ussed in Section

5.1, Aesthetics. The DRSP and ARSP include policies and methods for establishing and maintaining a unified resort identity, which would help to ensure compatibility. All future development within the Project Site would be subject to development standards and design guidelines set forth in the DRSP and ARSP. Also, “setback realm areas” have been
incorporated into the Project, which include enhanced
landscaping to ensure future compatibility with surrounding areas as buildout of the Project occurs (City of Anaheim 2022c).

Strategy 3E Community Design

Anaheim City CouncilApril 16, 2024

Anaheim City Council
April 16, 2024