Mitigation Fee Act
FY 2023-24 Annual and Five-Year Report
For All City Fees Combined
1 CITY OF ANAHEIM
MITIGATION FEE ACT
FY 2023‐24 ANNUAL AND FIVE‐YEAR REPORT
FOR ALL CITY FEES COMBINED
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Annual Report Requirement (Government Code Section 66006(b)) ........................................................ 3 Five‐Year Report Requirement (Government Code Section 66001(d)) .................................................... 4 ANNUAL REPORT FOR ALL FEES .................................................................................................................... 5 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF FEES ................................................................................................................. 5 FEE AMOUNTS ....................................................................................................................................... 7 BEGINNING AND ENDING FUND BALANCES ....................................................................................... 11 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT EXPENDITURES .............................................................................. 12 NEW PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DETAILS – Not Commenced ................................................. 15 PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DETAILS – Not Commenced .................. 16 INTERFUND TRANSFERS AND LOANS .................................................................................................. 17 REFUNDS UNDER SECTION 66001(e) .................................................................................................. 18 FIVE‐YEAR REPORT FOR LIBRARY DEVELOPER FEES .................................................................................... 19 Required Findings ................................................................................................................................... 19 Incomplete Improvements That Were Identified When Imposing the Fee ........................................ 20 FIVE‐YEAR REPORT FOR PARK IN LIEU FEES ................................................................................................ 21 Required Findings ................................................................................................................................... 21 Incomplete Improvements That Were Identified When Imposing the Fee ........................................ 22 FIVE‐YEAR REPORT FOR PLATINUM TRIANGLE: LIBRARY IMPACT FEES ..................................................... 23 Required Findings ................................................................................................................................... 23 Incomplete Improvements That Were Identified When Imposing the Fee ........................................ 24 FIVE‐YEAR REPORT FOR PLATINUM TRIANGLE: PARK IN LIEU FEES ........................................................... 25 Required Findings ................................................................................................................................... 25 Incomplete Improvements That Were Identified When Imposing the Fee ........................................ 26 2 FIVE‐YEAR REPORT FOR PLATINUM TRIANGLE: FIRE SUPPRESSION FACILITIES AND VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT IMPACT FEES .......................................................................................................................... 27 Required Findings ................................................................................................................................... 27 Incomplete Improvements That Were Identified When Imposing the Fee ........................................ 28 FIVE‐YEAR REPORT FOR PLATINUM TRIANGLE: LAW ENFORCEMENT FACILITIES AND VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT IMPACT FEES .......................................................................................................................... 29 Required Findings ................................................................................................................................... 29 Incomplete Improvements That Were Identified When Imposing the Fee ........................................ 30 FIVE‐YEAR REPORT FOR PLATINUM TRIANGLE: TRAFFIC/STORM DRAIN/SEWER/ARTERIAL HIGHWAY BEAUTIFICATIONS IMPACT FEES ................................................................................................................. 31 Required Findings ................................................................................................................................... 31 Incomplete Improvements That Were Identified When Imposing the Fee ........................................ 32 FIVE‐YEAR REPORT FOR SEWER IMPACT FEES ............................................................................................ 33 Required Findings ................................................................................................................................... 33 Incomplete Improvements That Were Identified When Imposing the Fee ........................................ 34 FIVE‐YEAR REPORT FOR STORM DRAIN IMPACT FEES ................................................................................ 35 Required Findings ................................................................................................................................... 35 Incomplete Improvements That Were Identified When Imposing the Fee ........................................ 36 FIVE‐YEAR REPORT FOR TRANSPORTATION IMPACT AND IMPROVEMENT FEES ....................................... 37 Required Findings ................................................................................................................................... 37 Incomplete Improvements That Were Identified When Imposing the Fee ........................................ 38 West Anaheim Master Plan of Sanitary Sewers Zone Map .................................................................... 39 Central Sewer Zone Map ........................................................................................................................ 40
3 INTRODUCTION
The Mitigation Fee Act (California Government Code Section 66000, et seq., the “Act”) requires local agencies to report, every year and every fifth year, certain financial information regarding their develop‐ ment impact fees.
Annual Report Requirement (Government Code Section 66006(b)) The requirement for an annual report also applies to fees for public facilities collected under develop‐ ment agreements entered into on or after January 1, 2004. (Gov. Code § 65865(e).) The local agency must make this information available for review by the public and must present it at the next regularly scheduled public meeting not less than 15 days from when the information is made available to the pub‐ lic. The Annual Report must be filed within 180 days of the end of each fiscal year.
This Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2023‐24 presents information required by the Act for certain develop‐ ment impact fee funds established by the City, identified as follows:
Fund
No. Fund Name
215 Library Developer Fees
216 Park In Lieu Fees
471 Platinum Triangle: L ibrary Impact Fees
471 Platinum Triangle: Park In Lieu Fees
471 Platinum Triangle: Fire Supp ression Facilities and Vehicle and Equipment Impact Fees 471 Platinum Triangle: Law Enforcement Facilities and Vehicle a nd Equipment Impact Fees 471 Platinum Triangle: Traffic/Storm Drain/Sewer/Arterial Highw ay Beautifications Impact Fees 211 Sewer Impact Fees
212 Storm Drain Impact Fees
278 Transportation Impact and Improvement Fees
For each fee deposited into these funds, the report provides the following information in accordance with the requirements of the Act:
a. A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund. b. The amount of the fee.
c. The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund. d. The amount of the fees collected and interest earned. e. An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended and the amount of expenditures on each improvement, including the total percentage of the cost of the public im‐ provement that was funded by the fees.
f. An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to com‐ plete financing on an incomplete public improvement identified pursuant to Section 66001(a)(2) 4 when the fee was imposed. In addition, an identification of each public improvement identified in a previous report, and whether construction began on the approximate date noted in the pre‐ vious report. For a project identified in a previous report for which construction did not com‐ mence by the approximate date provided in the previous report, the reason for the delay and a revised approximate date that the local agency will commence construction. g. A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or fund, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loan fees will be expended, and, in the case of an interfund loan, the date on which the loan will be repaid, and the rate of interest that the ac‐ count or fund will receive on the loan.
h. The amount of any refunds made pursuant to Gov. Code Section 66001(e), the number of per‐ sons or entities entitled to receive those refunds, and any allocations made pursuant to Gov.
Code Section 66001(f).
Five‐Year Report Requirement (Government Code Section 66001(d)) In addition to the Annual Report requirements, the Act also requires a more in‐depth five‐year report.
For the fifth fiscal year following the first deposit into an account or fund, and every five (5) years there‐ after, the City is required to make specified findings with respect to that portion of any account or fund remaining unexpended, whether committed or uncommitted. The findings must:
a. Identify the purpose to which a fee is to be put;
b. Demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which it is charged; c. Identify all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing incomplete im‐ provements identified pursuant to Section 66001(a)(2) when the fee was imposed; and d. Designate the approximate dates on which the funding referred to in (c) above is expected to be deposited into the appropriate account or fund.
The five‐year findings must be made in connection with the Annual Reporting outlined above.
5 ANNUAL REPORT FOR ALL FEES
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF FEES
Gov. Code § 66006(b)(1)(A)
The broad purpose of impact fees is to protect public health, safety, and general welfare by providing for adequate public facilities. The specific purpose of fees is to fund construction of certain public improve‐ ments that will be needed to mitigate the impacts of planned new development on City facilities and to maintain an acceptable level of public services as the City grows.
The table below provides a brief description of the types of fees in the accounts or funds covered by this Annual Report.
Fund No. Fund Name Fee Description
Municipal
Code Section
Date of Most
Recent Fee
Study
215 Library Developer
Fees
Public Library Facilities planfeefor
the East Santa Ana Canyon Area.
17.08.385 1989
216 Park in Lieu Fees Resid ential Development Impact Fee for park and recreation pur‐
poses.
17.34.030 2010
471 Platinum Triangle Area
Impact Fees
Fee to fund a new library facility in
the Platinum Triangle area to main‐
tain the same standard of service
per capita for the City.
17.34.030 2005
471 Platinum Triangle Area
Impact Fees
Fee to provide park and recrea‐
tional facilities to serve the future
residents of each tract in the Plati‐
num Triangle area.
17.34.030 2005
471 Platinum Triangle
Area Impact Fees
Fee to fund Fire Suppression Facili‐
ties and Vehicle and Equipment Im‐
pact for the Platinum triangle
Mixed Use Overlay Zone.
17.36.020 2005
471 Platinum Triangle Area
Impact Fees
Fee is to fund the establishment of
public safety facilities, vehicle and
equipment, for new and expanded
development in the Platinum Trian‐
gle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay
Zone.
18.20.010 2005
471 Platinum Triangle Area
Impact Fees
Supplemental Traffic Impact Feefor
public infrastructure improvements
in the Platinum Triangle area.
17.38.020.0112 2005
471 Platinum Triangle Area
Impact Fees
Supplemental Storm Drain Impact
Fees for public infrastructure im‐
provements in the Platinum Trian‐
gle area.
17.38.020.0113 2005
6 Fund No. Fund Name Fee Description
Municipal
Code Section
Date of Most
Recent Fee
Study
471 Platinum Triangle Area
Impact Fees
Supplemental Sewer Impact Fees
for public infrastructure improve‐
ments in the Platinum Triangle
area.
17.38.020.0114 2005
471 Platinum Triangle Area
Impact Fees
Supplemental Arterial Highway
Beautification Impact Fees for pub‐
lic infrastructure improvements in
the Platinum Triangle area.
17.38.020.0115 2005
211 Sewer Construction
Impact Fees
Sewer Impact Feeto mitigate the
deficiencies in the sewer system
caused by new development
and/or by additions and expansion
to existing development in the City.
10.12.085
10.12.090
10.12.095
2021/2023
212 Storm Drain Construc‐
tion Impact Fees
Storm Drain Impact Feeto fund
storm drain facilities to reduce the
impacts on the storm drain system
caused by new development and
expansions/additions to existing
developments.
10.14.010 1994
278 Transportation Impact
Fees
Transportation Impact and Im‐
provement Fee to implement the
goals and objectives of the Circula‐
tion Element of the City of Ana‐
heim’s General Plan and to mitigate
the traffic impacts caused by new
development.
17.32.020 2006
7 FEE AMOUNTS
Gov. Code § 66006(b)(1)(B)
The following table details the amount of each fee for the fiscal year that ended on 6/30/24, unless otherwise indicated.
Citywide Platinum Triangle Zone A Zone B Zone C Zone D Library Developer Fee
East Ana‐
heim Only
Single‐family detached dwelling (per unit) $353.89 $486.77 Single‐family attached dwelling (per unit) $257.38 $486.77 Multi‐family two‐to‐four units (per unit) $235.25 $486.77 Multi‐family five or more units (per unit) $235.25 $486.77 Park in Lieu Fee
Single‐family detached dwelling (per unit) $6,936.46 $8,114.01 Single‐family attached dwelling (per unit) $5,388.14 $8,114.01 Multi‐family two‐to‐four units (per unit) $6,998.39 $8,114.01 Multi‐family five or more units (per unit) $5,408.78 $8,114.01 Fire Suppression Facilities and Vehicle and Equipment Impact Fee Single‐family detached dwelling (per unit) $2,493.00
Single‐family attached dwelling (per unit) $1,321.00
Mobile Home dwelling unit $2,493.00
Multi‐family two‐to‐four units (per unit) $0.00
Multi‐family five or more units (per unit) $0.00
Commercial Lodging (per 1,000 sf of gross floor area) $891.00 Commercial/Office (per 1,000 sf of gross floor area) $1,444.00 Private Amusement Area (per 1,000 sf of gross floor area) $5,563.00 Industrial/Manufacturing (per 1,000 sf of gross floor area) $199.00
8 Citywide Platinum Triangle Zone A1 Zone B1 Zone C1 Zone D1 Law Enforcement Facilities and Vehicle and Equipment Impact Fee Single‐family detached dwelling units $747.00
Single‐family attached dwelling units $623.00
Mobile Home dwelling unit $385.00
Commercial Lodging $726.00
Commercial Office (per 1,000 sf of gross floor area) $839.00 Private Amusement Area (per 1,000 sf of gross floor area) $263. 00 Industrial/Manufacturing (per 1,000 sf of gross floor area) $10 6.00 Sewer Connection Fee
Per acre $350.00
Sewer Impact Fees (West Anaheim)
$640/1,000 gross
sf
Single‐family detached/attached dwelling (per unit) $1,322.00 $ 2,222.00 $1,600.00 $356.00 Multi‐family (two or more) (per unit) $1,322.00 $2,222.00 $1,60 0.00 $356.00 Corridor Residential (per unit) $1,322.00 $2,222.00 $1,600.00 $356.00 Mobile Home dwelling unit $1,322.00 $2,222.00 $1,600.00 $356.00 Transient Facilities (Hotel/Motel) (per room) $444.00 $7 47.00 $ 537.00 $119.00 Mixed Use Residential (per unit) $1,322.00 $2,222.00 $1,600.00 $356.00 Mixed Use Non‐Residential (per 1,000 sf of gross floor area) $6 14.00 $1,033.00 $745.00 $164.00 Commercial (per 1,000 sf of gross floor area) $614.00 $1,033.00 $745.00 $164.00 Industrial/Manufacturing (per 1,000 sf of gross floor area) $43 0.00 $724.00 $521.00 $116.00 Institutional (per 1,000 sf of gross floor area) $369.00 $620.0 0 $446.00 $101.00 Quasi‐Public/Recreational (per 1,000 sf of gross floor area) $3 5.00 $60.00 $42.00 $9.00 Sewer Impact Fees (East Anaheim)
$640/1,000 gross
sf
Single‐family detached/attached dwelling (per unit) $491.00 Estate (per unit) $566.00
1 Refer to the West Anaheim Master Plan of Sanitary Sewers Zone Map
9 Citywide Platinum Triangle Zone A2 Zone B2 Zone C2 Zone D2 Multi‐family (two or more) (per unit) $421.00
Commercial (per 1,000 sf of gross floor area) $370.00
Industrial/Manufacturing (per 1,000 sf of gross floor area) $11 1.00 Institutional (per 1,000 sf of gross floor area) $270.00 Sewer Impact Fees (Central Anaheim)
$640/1,000 gross
sf
Single‐family detached/attached dwelling (per unit) $2,235.00 $ 1,864.00 $2,130.00 $2,218.00 Multi‐family (two or more) (per unit) $2,235.00 $1,864.00 $2,13 0.00 $2,218.00 Corridor Residential (per unit) $2,235.00 $1,864.00 $2,130.00 $2,218.00 Mobile Home dwelling unit $844.00 $702.00 $805.00 $838.00 Transient Facilities (Hotel/Motel) (per room) $631.00 $5 27.00 $ 602.00 $628.00 Mixed Use Residential (per unit) $1,287.00 $1,073.00 $1,226.00 $1,278.00 Mixed Use Non‐Residential (per 1,000 sf of gross floor area) $8 76.00 $730.00 $835.00 $870.00 Commercial (per 1,000 sf of gross floor area) $876.00 $730.00 $ 835.00 $870.00 Industrial/Manufacturing (per 1,000 sf of gross floor area) $61 3.00 $511.00 $584.00 $613.00 Institutional (per 1,000 sf of gross floor area) $525.00 $439.0 0 $501.00 $509.00 Quasi‐Public/Recreational (per 1,000 sf of gross floor area) $5 0.00 $41.00 $47.00 $50.00 Storm Drain Impact Fees (Anaheim Resort Area & South Central Ana‐ heim)
Single‐family detached/attached dwelling (net acre) $19,080.00 $110,868.00 Multi‐family (two or more) (net acre) $24,296.00 $110,868.00 Mobile Home dwelling unit (net acre) $27,812.00 $110,868.00 Transient Facilities (Hotel/Motel) (net acre) $34,769.00 $110,8 68.00 Commercial (net acre) $34,769.00 $110,868.00
Industrial/Manufacturing (net acre) $34,769.00 $110,868.00 Recreational (net acre) $34,769.00 $110,868.00
2 Refer to the Central Sewer Zone Map
10 Citywide Platinum Triangle Zone A Zone B Zone C Zone D Storm Drain Impact Fees (District 27)
Single‐family detached/attached dwelling (net acre) $28,599.00 $110,868.00 Multi‐family (two or more) (net acre) $35,161.00 $110,868.00 Mobile Home dwelling unit (net acre) $41,705.00 $110,868.00 Transient Facilities (Hotel/Motel) (net acre) $52,132.00 $110,8 68.00 Commercial (net acre) $52,132.00 $110,868.00
Industrial/Manufacturing (net acre) $52,132.00 $110,868.00 Recreational (net acre) $52,132.00 $110,868.00
Transportation Impact and Improvement Fees
Single‐family detached/attached dwelling (per unit) $2,029.00 Multi‐family (two or more) (per unit) $1,297.00
Transient Facilities (Hotel/Motel) (per unit) $1,474.00 Office (gross square feet) $3.67
Mixed Use Non‐Residential (gross square feet) $5.50
Industrial/Manufacturing (gross square feet) $1.42
Peak Hour Trip End (per trip) $1,285.00
Traffic Impact Fees
Single‐family attached dwelling (per unit) $3,702.00
Multi‐family (two or more) (per unit) $5,015.00
Office (gross square feet) $12.00
Commercial (gross square feet) $50.00
Industrial (gross square feet) $3.00
Arterial Highway Beautification (all land use)
All land use (gross acre) $18,619.00
11 BEGINNING AND ENDING FUND BALANCES
Gov. Code § 66006(b)(1)(C), (D), (G), (H)
This section includes (c) beginning and ending balances of each fund/account, (d) amount of the fees collected and interest earned, (g) any inter‐ fund transfer or loan made, and (h) the amount of any refunds made under Section 66001(e).
Library
Devel‐
oper
Fees
(215)
Park In Lieu
Fees (216)
Platinum
Triangle
Fees
Library
(471)
Platinum
Triangle
Fees
Park (471)
Platinum
Triangle
Fees
Fire (471)
Platinum
Triangle
Fees
Law En‐
forcement
(471)
Platinum
Triangle
Fees
Public
Works
(471)
Sewer Im‐
pact Fees
(211)
Storm
Drain
Impact
Fees
(212)
Transpor‐
tation Im‐
pact and
Improve‐
ment Fees
(278)
Beginning Fund
Balance
(July 1, 2023) $‐ $13,487,347 $1,571,214 $9,101,248 $7,714,523 $2,221,916 $215,742 $12,275,449 $65,241 $6,889,168 Revenues ‐ 761,738 ‐ 1,760,819 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Fees Collected ‐ 1,521,519 ‐ ‐ 448,942 227,160 1,014,090 272,0 75 ‐ 1,698,727 Interest Earned ‐ 451,689 63,646 342,083 280,103 55,531 200,591 423,096 2,260 230,499 Other ‐ (9,652) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Total Revenues ‐ 2,725,294 63,646 2,102,902 729,045 282,691 1,214,681 695,171 2,260 1,929,227 Expenditures ‐ 35,839 ‐ 205,363 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 10,639 Public Improve‐
ment Projects ‐ 7,382,306 ‐ 2,211,775 416,774 637,599 ‐ 624,97 9 1,205,181 Interfund
Transfer or
L o a n ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
8,400
Refunds under
Section 66001€ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Ending Fund
Balance
(June 30, 2024) $‐ $8,794,496 $1,634,860 $8,787,012 $8,026,794 $1,867,008 $1,430,423 $12,345,641 $67,501 $7,594,174
12 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Gov. Code § 66006(b)(1)(F)
The public improvement projects listed below include all public improvement projects on which fees were expended in FY 2023‐24:
Project (FUND) Fee Name
FY 2023/24 Project
Expenditures
Amount Funded
by Impact Fees
Amount
Funded by
Other Sources
% of Cost
Funded by
Fees
None to report Library Developer Fees $‐ $‐ $‐ ‐%
Total Library Developer Fees (215) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Oak Canyon Nature Center Renovation Park in Lieu Fee 1,363,218 1,363,218 ‐ 100% Rio Vista Park Park in Lieu Fee 30,359 9,276 21,083 31% Brookhurst Teen Center Improvements Park in Lieu Fee 46,570 46 ,570 ‐ 100% La Palma Promenade Park in Lieu Fee 177,124 177,124 ‐ 100% Peter Marshall Playground Park i n Lieu Fee 186,290 186,290 ‐ 1 00% Center Greens Park in Lieu Fee 5,556,249 5,556,249 ‐ 100% Little Pine Park Park in Lieu Fee 20,708 20,708 ‐ 100% Various Parks Park in Lieu Fee 17,150 17,150 ‐ 100% Citrus Park Park in Lieu Fee 1,665 1,665 ‐ 100%
Paul Revere Park Park in Lieu Fee 3,551 2,390 1,161 67% Ross Park Park in Lieu Fee 1,665 1,665 ‐ 100%
Total Park in Lieu Fee (216) 7,404,549 $7,382,306 22,244 100% None to report Platinum Triangle Fee ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Total Platinum Triangle ‐ Library (471) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
River Park Land Acquisition Plati num Triangle Fee 216,388 216, 388 ‐ 100% River Park Platinum Triangle Fee 4,475 4,475 ‐ 100% Boysen Park Improvements Platinum Triangle Fee 1,063,373 1,063 ,373 ‐ 100% OC River Walk Platinum Triangl e Fee 889,122 889,122 ‐ 100% Various Parks Platinum Triangl e Fee 38,417 38,417 ‐ 100% Total Platinum Triangle ‐ Parks (471) 2,211,775 2,211,775 ‐ 98% Fire Station 12 Platinum Triangle Fee 416,774 416,774 ‐ 100% Total Platinum Triangle ‐ Fire (471) 416,774 416,774 ‐ 100%
13 Project (FUND) Fee Name
FY 2023/24 Project
Expenditures
Amount Funded
by Impact Fees
Amount
Funded by
Other Sources
% of Cost
Funded by
Fees
Police response vehicles for PTMU Overlay
Zone: Six (6) Ford Police Interceptors and Six
(6) Half‐Ton Crew Cab Pickup Trucks Platinum Triangle Fee 637,5 99 637,599 ‐ 100% Total Platinum Triangle ‐ Law Enforcement (471) 637,599 637,599 22,244 100% None to report Platinum Triangle Fee ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Total Platinum Triangle ‐ Public Works (471) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Master Plan of Sanitary Sewers Sewer Impact Fee 19,171 19,171 ‐ 1 0 0 % Combined Central Anaheim Area Sewer Sewer Impact Fee 3,337 1,4 71 1,866 44% Katella Avenue Relief Sewer Improvement Sewer Impact Fee 1,268 1,268 ‐ 100% Del Monte Sewer: Knott to Bella Sewer Impact Fee 176,319 7,334 168,985 4% La Reina/Lincoln West of Magnolia Sewer Sewer Impact Fee 1,227, 913 91,866 1,136,046 7% Cypress/Resh/Citron Sanitary Sewer Im‐
provements Sewer Impact Fee 321,956 1,057 320,899 0% Alley South of Broadway: Citron to West to
Santa Ana Street Sewer Impact Fee 1,562 20 1,542 1% Brookhurst and Crescent Sanitary Sewer Im‐
provements Sewer Impact Fee 295,923 87,287 208,637 29% Central Anaheim Master Plan of Sanitary
Sewers Sewer Impact Fee 411,855 411,855 ‐ 100%
Julianna Street West of Harbor Blvd Sanitary
Sewer Improvement Sewer Impact Fee 26,054 104 25,950 0% Santa Ana and Elder Sanitary Sewer Improve‐
ments Sewer Impact Fee 22,325 1,776 20,549 8%
East Anaheim Sewer Master Plan Update Sewer Impact Fee 1,770 1 ,770 ‐ 100% Total Sewer Impact Fee (211) 2,509,453 624,979 1,884,474 25% None to report Storm Drain Impact Fee ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Total Storm Drain Impact Fees (212) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Engineering Inspection Transportation Impact Fee 2,321,312 369 2,320,943 ‐ Circulation and Environmental Element Up‐
date Transportation Impact Fee 7,713 7,713 ‐ 100%
14 Project (FUND) Fee Name
FY 2023/24 Project
Expenditures
Amount Funded
by Impact Fees
Amount
Funded by
Other Sources
% of Cost
Funded by
Fees
Anaheim Traffic Analysis Model Development Transportation Impac t Fee 15,849 15,849 ‐ 100% Local Roadway Safety Study Transportation Impact Fee 114 114 ‐ 1 0 0 % Knott Avenue Driveway Approach Improve‐
ments Transportation Impact Fee 217,123 1,205 215,918 1% Citywide Signal Coordination Transportation Impact Fee 236,385 235,784 600 100% Euclid Traffic Signal Synchronization Transportation Impact Fee 2,292 2,292 ‐ 100% Kraemer Traffic Signal Synchronization Transportation Impact Fe e 21 21 ‐ 100% Magnolia Traffic Signal Synchronization Transportation Impact F ee 127 127 ‐ 100% Euclid (Crescent to Glenoaks) Signal Modifi‐
cations Transportation Impact Fee 1,103,143 396,417 706,726 36 % Katella Ave Traffic Signal Synchronization Transportation Impac t Fee 370,528 370,528 ‐ 100% Advanced Dilemma Zone Detection at 7 Sig‐
nalized Intersection Transportation Impact Fee 52,892 46,472 6 ,420 88% FY19‐20 Pedestrian Crossing Signal Head Up‐
grade Transportation Impact Fee 2,585 2,585 ‐ 100% OCSD Orange‐Western Signal Upgrades Transportation Impact Fee 5 7,350 51,595 5,755 90% Orangethorpe Traffic Signal Synchronization Transportation Impa ct Fee 7,397 7,397 ‐ 100% Tustin/Rose Signal Synchronization Mods Transportation Impact F ee 53,823 53,823 ‐ 100% HSIP Cycle 10‐3 Intersections Transportation Impact Fee 11,840 742 11,098 6% Weir Cyn Traffic Signal Synchronization ‐
Yorba Linda Transportation Impact Fee 23,133 3,620 19,513 16% Euclid Traffic Signal Synchronization R91 E/B
Ramps to Katella Ave Transportation Impact Fee 13,045 8,529 4, 516 65%
Total Transportation Im‐
pact Fee 4,507,621 1,205,181 3,291,798 27%
TOTAL $17,687,772 $12,450,837 $5,220,760 70%
15 NEW PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DETAILS – Not Commenced Gov. Code § 66006(b)(1)(F)
Newly Identified Public Improvement Projects with Sufficient Funding: The table below provides information about any public improvement projects that have been newly identified in FY 2023‐2024 as having sufficient funding. For each public improvement project identified, a descrip‐ tion of the project as well as the approximate date of commencement of construction are identified.
Public Improvement Project Name Project Description
Date of
Determination of
Sufficient Funds
Approximate Date of
Commencement of
Construction
No new projects have been identified
16 PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DETAILS – Not Commenced Gov. Code § 66006(b)(1)(F)
Previously Identified Public Improvement Projects with Sufficient Funding: The table below identifies each public improvement identified in a previous report, and whether construction began on the approximate date noted in the previous report. For a project identified in a previous report for which construction did not commence by the approximate date provided in the previous report, the reason for the delay and a revised approximate date construction will commence are also provided.
Public Improvement Project Name Project Description
Previously Identified
Date of
Commencement of
Construction
Date Construction
Commenced
Explanation of Reason Why
Construction Not Commenced; or
Why Construction Did Not Begin
on Previously Identified Date
Revised Approximate
Date of
Commencement of
Construction
Fire Station 12 Construct a new Fire
Station 12 in the Platinum
Triangle Mixed Use
Overlay Zone
2022 N/A The proposed site for Fire Station
12 was encumbered by an existing
parking lease agreement that
needed to be modified or
terminated before construction
started, where the status of the
parking lease was indeterminate.
As a result, the City and the Design‐
Build contractor determined it was
not mutually advantageous to
begin with the project, since
additional delays would likely
compromise the quality, delivery,
and budget for the project.
December 2024
17 INTERFUND TRANSFERS AND LOANS
Gov. Code § 66006(b)(1)(G)
The following table includes an explanation of each interfund transfer made in FY 2024, including public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and in the case of an interfund loan, the date on which the loan will be repaid, and rate of interest that the amount of fund will receive on the loan.
Originating Fund
Other Fund to Which Fees
Were Transferred or
Loaned
Interfund Transfer
Type
(Transfer or Loan)
Amount of Loan or
Transfer ($)
Public Improvement on Which
Fees Will Be Expended
For Interfund Loans:
Date on Which Loan
Will Be Repaid and
Interest Rate
Fund 278 Fund 275 Transfer 5,060 N/A N/ A
Fund 278 Fund 276 Transfer 2937 N/A N/ A
Fund 278 Fund 542 Transfer 403 N/A N/ A
18 REFUNDS UNDER SECTION 66001(e)
Gov. Code § 66006(b)(1)(H)
The following table shows the amount of any refunds made pursuant to Section 66001(e), the number of persons or entitled to receive those refunds, and any allocations made pursuant to Section 66001(f).
Originating Fund Amount of Refunds ($)
Number of Persons or
Entities Identified to
Receive Refunds
Reallocations to Different
Purposes Pursuant to
Section 66001(f)
19 FIVE‐YEAR REPORT FOR LIBRARY DEVELOPER FEES
[City/Responsible Department, Divi‐
sion]:
Anaheim/Community Services/Library
Fund or Account No.: 215
Type and Name of Fee: Library Developer Fees ‐ Residential Required Findings
Finding: Purpose of Fee
The purpose of the Library Developer Fee is to provide reve‐ nues to fund the construction of various Library facilities and equipment that will mitigate the impact of new residential and non‐residential development to the City's Library Facilities.
Finding: Reasonable Relationship
There is a reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which it is charged due to an expected increase of population density which would require a new facility for Li‐ brary to maintain the same standard of service per capita.
Finding: Funding of Incomplete Projects
The City finds that the following table identifies all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing of in‐ complete improvements identified pursuant to Section
66001(a)(2) when the fee was imposed and designates the ap‐ proximate dates on which these funds are expected to be de‐ posited into the fund.
20 Incomplete Improvements That Were Identified When Imposing the Fee Improve‐
ment De‐
scription
Total Esti‐
mated
Cost ($)
Total Fees
Collected for
Improve‐
ment
Additional
Amount
Expected
to be
Funded
by Fees
Other
Sources and
Amounts of
Funding An‐
ticipated to
Complete
the Project
Estimated
Date for
Additional
Funding
to be De‐
posited in
Fund
Notes Regarding
Project Status
NONE
21 FIVE‐YEAR REPORT FOR PARK IN LIEU FEES
[City/Responsible Department, Divi‐
sion]:
Anaheim/Community Services Department/Parks Division
Fund or Account No.: 216
Type and Name of Fee: Developer Park in Lieu Fee
Required Findings
Finding: Purpose of Fee
The purpose of the Park In‐Lieu Fee is to fund and provide park and recreational facilities to serve the future residents of each tract.
Finding: Reasonable Relationship
There is a reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which is it is charged because residential develop‐ ments, particularly single‐family/condo and multi‐family apart‐ ments, bring more residents and higher density to relatively small areas. For the City to mitigate impacts and provide a public service through more park space and/or amenities for more residents, it must recover, or partially recover, the high cost of the additional infrastructure needed.
Finding: Funding of Incomplete Projects
The City finds that the following table identifies all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing of in‐ complete improvements identified pursuant to Section
66001(a)(2) when the fee was imposed and designates the ap‐ proximate dates on which these funds are expected to be de‐ posited into the fund.
22 Incomplete Improvements That Were Identified When Imposing the Fee Improve‐
ment De‐
scription
Total Esti‐
mated
Cost ($)
Total Fees
Collected for
Improve‐
ment
Additional
Amount
Expected
to be
Funded
by Fees
Other
Sources and
Amounts of
Funding An‐
ticipated to
Complete
the Project
Estimated
Date for
Additional
Funding
to be De‐
posited in
Fund
Notes Regarding
Project Status
NONE
23 FIVE‐YEAR REPORT FOR PLATINUM TRIANGLE: LIBRARY IMPACT FEES [City/Responsible Department, Divi‐
sion]:
Anaheim/Community Services/Library
Fund or Account No.: 471
Type and Name of Fee: Platinum Triangle Fees ‐ Residential Required Findings
Finding: Purpose of Fee
The purpose of the Platinum Triangle Fees is to provide reve‐ nues to fund the construction of various Library facilities and equipment that will mitigate the impact of new residential and non‐residential development to the City's Library Facilities.
Finding: Reasonable Relationship
There is a reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which is it is charged because the planned in‐ crease of population in the Platinum Triangle requires a new facility to maintain the existing standard of library service per capita in the City.
Finding: Funding of Incomplete Projects
The City finds that the following table identifies all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing of in‐ complete improvements identified pursuant to Section
66001(a)(2) when the fee was imposed and designates the ap‐ proximate dates on which these funds are expected to be de‐ posited into the fund.
24 Incomplete Improvements That Were Identified When Imposing the Fee Improvement
Description
Total Estimated
Cost ($)
Total Fees
Collected for
Improvement
Additional
Amount Expected
to be Funded by
Fees
Other Sources
and Amounts of
Funding
Anticipated to
Complete the
Project
Estimated Date
for Additional
Funding to be
Deposited in
Fund
Notes Regarding
Project Status
Once the
population in the
Area of Benefit
reaches 23,000
then the planning
process would
start. The
population has
not reached that
threshold yet.
Current fee level
increased from
original fee level
in 2008 due to
inflation. Total
estimated cost of
facility would be
considerably
higher now in
2024. $150,172
from 471 fee went
to fund the City’s
portion of the
Ponderosa Joint
Use Library area
within the school
building. This
included supplies
and small capital
to open the
Ponderosa Joint‐
Use Branch in
2012 to fulfill a
MOU with the
Anaheim
Elementary School
District.
New Library
Facility in
Platinum
Triangle
$8,004,000 cost
estimated in
2008
$671,900 $7,332,100 None currently Unknown,
depends on
future
development
25 FIVE‐YEAR REPORT FOR PLATINUM TRIANGLE: PARK IN LIEU FEES [City/Responsible Department, Divi‐
sion]:
Anaheim/Community Services Department/Parks Division
Fund or Account No.: 471
Type and Name of Fee: Developer Park In Lieu Fee (Platinum Triangle) Required Findings
Finding: Purpose of Fee
The purpose of the Park In‐Lieu Fee is to fund and provide park and recreational facilities to serve the future residents of each tract.
Finding: Reasonable Relationship
There is a reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which is it is charged because residential develop‐ ments, particularly single‐family/condo and multi‐family apart‐ ments, bring more residents and higher density to relatively small areas. In order for the City to mitigate impacts and pro‐ vide a public service through more park space and/or ameni‐ ties for more residents, it must recover, or partially recover, the high cost of the additional infrastructure needed.
Finding: Funding of Incomplete Projects
The City finds that the following table identifies all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing of in‐ complete improvements identified pursuant to Section
66001(a)(2) when the fee was imposed and designates the ap‐ proximate dates on which these funds are expected to be de‐ posited into the fund.
26 Incomplete Improvements That Were Identified When Imposing the Fee Improve‐
ment De‐
scription
Total Esti‐
mated
Cost ($)
Total Fees
Collected for
Improve‐
ment
Additional
Amount
Expected
to be
Funded
by Fees
Other
Sources and
Amounts of
Funding An‐
ticipated to
Complete
the Project
Estimated
Date for
Additional
Funding
to be De‐
posited in
Fund
Notes Regarding
Project Status
NONE
27 FIVE‐YEAR REPORT FOR PLATINUM TRIANGLE: FIRE SUPPRESSION FACILI‐ TIES AND VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT IMPACT FEES
[City/Responsible Department, Divi‐
sion]:
Anaheim/Fire & Rescue Department/Community Risk Reduc‐
tion Division
Fund or Account No.: 471
Type and Name of Fee: Fire Developer Fees
Required Findings
Finding: Purpose of Fee
Provide a revenue source to fund the construction of various Fire facilities and acquisition of equipment and vehicles that will mitigate the impacts of new residential and non‐residen‐ tial development to the City's Fire facilities.
Finding: Reasonable Relationship
New residential and non‐residential development in the City will generate additional residents and employees who will in turn generate service calls increasing the need for trained Fire personnel. Buildings, equipment, and vehicles used to provide these services will have to be expanded, constructed or pur‐ chased to meet this increased demand. New Fire facilities are needed to mitigate the impact of the additional residents and employees.
Finding: Funding of Incomplete Projects
The City finds that the following table identifies all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing of in‐ complete improvements identified pursuant to Section
66001(a)(2) when the fee was imposed and designates the ap‐ proximate dates on which these funds are expected to be de‐ posited into the fund.
28 Incomplete Improvements That Were Identified When Imposing the Fee Improve‐
ment De‐
scription
Total Esti‐
mated
Cost ($)
Total Fees
Collected for
Improve‐
ment
Additional
Amount
Expected
to be
Funded
by Fees
Other
Sources and
Amounts of
Funding An‐
ticipated to
Complete
the Project
Estimated
Date for
Additional
Funding
to be De‐
posited in
Fund
Notes Regarding
Project Status
NONE
29 FIVE‐YEAR REPORT FOR PLATINUM TRIANGLE: LAW ENFORCEMENT FA‐ CILITIES AND VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT IMPACT FEES
[City/Responsible Department, Divi‐
sion]:
Anaheim/Police Department/Operations Support Division
Fund or Account No.: 471
Type and Name of Fee: Impact Fee –Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone Law Enforcement Facilities and Vehicle and Equipment Impact Fee
Required Findings
Finding: Purpose of Fee
The purpose of the Platinum Triangle Fund Development Im‐ pact Fee is to fund the establishment of public safety facilities, vehicle and equipment, for new and expanded development in the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone.
Finding: Reasonable Relationship
There is a reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which is it is charged because it is needed to miti‐ gate the impacts on law enforcement and crime prevention services caused by new and expanded development within the Platinum Triangle. It is needed to finance the construction and/or expansion and addition of police stations, and the ac‐ quisition of vehicles and equipment needed to serve new resi‐ dential, commercial, entertainment, amusement, and indus‐ trial developments and expansions and additions to such exist‐ ing developments.
Finding: Funding of Incomplete Projects
The City finds that the following table identifies all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing of in‐ complete improvements identified pursuant to Section
66001(a)(2) when the fee was imposed and designates the ap‐ proximate dates on which these funds are expected to be de‐ posited into the fund.
30 Incomplete Improvements That Were Identified When Imposing the Fee Improve‐
ment De‐
scription
Total Esti‐
mated
Cost ($)
Total Fees
Collected for
Improve‐
ment
Additional
Amount
Expected
to be
Funded
by Fees
Other
Sources and
Amounts of
Funding An‐
ticipated to
Complete
the Project
Estimated
Date for
Additional
Funding
to be De‐
posited in
Fund
Notes Regarding
Project Status
NONE
31 FIVE‐YEAR REPORT FOR PLATINUM TRIANGLE: TRAFFIC/STORM DRAIN/SEWER/ARTERIAL HIGHWAY BEAUTIFICATIONS IMPACT FEES [City/Responsible Department, Divi‐
sion]:
Anaheim/Public Works Department
Fund or Account No.: Platinum Triangle Area Fees‐471
Type and Name of Fee: Traffic/Storm Drain/Sewer/Arterial Highway Beautification Required Findings
Finding: Purpose of Fee
The purpose of the Platinum Triangle Area Fees is to fund pub‐ lic improvements made necessary by proposed and antici‐ pated high‐intensity and high‐density development in the Plat‐ inum Triangle Area.
Finding: Reasonable Relationship
There is a reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which is it is charged because the fee being charged is for the intensive use in the Platinum Triangle, by owners or developers outside of the Community Facilities Dis‐ trict (CFD), to support infrastructure improvements in the area.
Finding: Funding of Incomplete Projects
The Supplemental fees are paid for by properties outside of the Community Facilities District (CFD) within the Platinum Tri‐ angle. Fees are meant to support the Platinum Triangle Imple‐ mentation Plan. There are no incomplete projects as these fees are meant to support the Plan for any shortfalls after the Platinum Triangle Bonds are expended.
32 Incomplete Improvements That Were Identified When Imposing the Fee Improve‐
ment De‐
scription
Total Esti‐
mated
Cost ($)
Total Fees
Collected for
Improve‐
ment
Additional
Amount
Expected
to be
Funded
by Fees
Other
Sources and
Amounts of
Funding An‐
ticipated to
Complete
the Project
Estimated
Date for
Additional
Funding
to be De‐
posited in
Fund
Notes Regarding
Project Status
NONE
33 FIVE‐YEAR REPORT FOR SEWER IMPACT FEES
[City/Responsible Department, Divi‐
sion]:
Anaheim/Public Works Department
Fund or Account No.: Sewer Construction Fund‐211
Type and Name of Fee: Sewer Impact Fees
Required Findings
Finding: Purpose of Fee
The purpose of the Sewer Impact Fees is to mitigate the defi‐ ciencies in the sewer system caused by new development
and/or by additions and expansion to existing development in the City.
Finding: Reasonable Relationship
There is a reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which is it is charged because it is based on the projected increase in wastewater flows at build‐out.
Finding: Funding of Incomplete Projects
There are no incomplete projects from when the fee was im‐ posed. There are new Sanitary Sewer Master Plans every 10 years, which review sewer deficiencies that could potentially be supported with impact fees.
34 Incomplete Improvements That Were Identified When Imposing the Fee Improvement
Description
Total Es‐
timated
Cost ($)
Total Fees
Collected
for Im‐
provement
Addi‐
tional
Amount
Ex‐
pected
to be
Funded
by Fees
Other
Sources and
Amounts of
Funding An‐
ticipated to
Complete the
Project
Estimated
Date for
Additional
Funding to
be Depos‐
ited in
Fund
Notes Regarding
Project Status
NONE
35 FIVE‐YEAR REPORT FOR STORM DRAIN IMPACT FEES
[City/Responsible Department, Divi‐
sion]:
Anaheim/Public Works Department
Fund or Account No.: Storm Drain Construction‐212
Type and Name of Fee: Storm Drain Impact Fees
Required Findings
Finding: Purpose of Fee
The purpose of the Storm Drain Impact Fees is to fund storm drain facilities to reduce the impacts on the storm drain sys‐ tem caused by new development and expansions/additions to existing developments.
Finding: Reasonable Relationship
There is a reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which is it is charged because the fee being charged is for storm drain facilities that will provide flood pro‐ tection and accommodate additional storm drainage flow gen‐ erated by development.
Finding: Funding of Incomplete Projects
There are no incomplete projects from when the fee was im‐ posed. There are new Storm Drainage Master Plans that have superseded the original master plans from when the fees were imposed.
36 Incomplete Improvements That Were Identified When Imposing the Fee Improve‐
ment De‐
scription
Total Esti‐
mated
Cost ($)
Total Fees
Collected for
Improve‐
ment
Additional
Amount
Expected
to be
Funded
by Fees
Other
Sources and
Amounts of
Funding An‐
ticipated to
Complete
the Project
Estimated
Date for
Additional
Funding
to be De‐
posited in
Fund
Notes Regarding
Project Status
NONE
37 FIVE‐YEAR REPORT FOR TRANSPORTATION IMPACT AND IMPROVEMENT FEES
[City/Responsible Department, Divi‐
sion]:
Anaheim/Public Works Department
Fund or Account No.: Citywide Transportation Fees‐278
Type and Name of Fee: Transportation Impact and Improvement Fees Required Findings
Finding: Purpose of Fee
The purpose of the Transportation Impact and Improvement fees are to implement the goals and objectives of the Circula‐ tion Element of the City of Anaheim’s General Plan and to mit‐ igate the traffic impacts caused by new development.
Finding: Reasonable Relationship
There is a reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which it is charged because it is based on the ac‐ tual cost of the traffic impacts based on traffic generation rates and cost of construction.
Finding: Funding of Incomplete Projects
There are no incomplete projects from when the fee was im‐ posed. The current fees are used to support the goals and ob‐ jectives of the Circulation Element of the city of Anaheim's General Plan
38 Incomplete Improvements That Were Identified When Imposing the Fee Improve‐
ment De‐
scription
Total Esti‐
mated
Cost ($)
Total Fees
Collected for
Improve‐
ment
Additional
Amount
Expected
to be
Funded
by Fees
Other
Sources and
Amounts of
Funding An‐
ticipated to
Complete
the Project
Estimated
Date for
Additional
Funding
to be De‐
posited in
Fund
Notes Regarding
Project Status
NONE
39 West Anaheim Master Plan of Sanitary Sewers Zone Map
40 Central Sewer Zone Map