Anaheim City Council
July 22, 2025

ANAHEIM CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 22, 2025
The regular meeting of April 22, 2025 was called to order at 3:35 p.m. in the Council Chamber of Anaheim City Hall, located at 200 South Anaheim Boulevard. The meeting notice, agenda, and related material were duly posted on April 17, 2025.

MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Pro Tem Natalie Meeks and Council Members Ryan Balius, Carlos A. Leon, Norma Campos Kurtz, and Kirsten M. Maahs.

Mayor Ashleigh E. Aitken and Council Member Natalie Rubalcava joined the meeting during Closed Session.

STAFF PRESENT: City Attorney Robert Fabela and City Clerk Theresa Bass ADDITIONS\DELETIONS TO CLOSED SESSION: City Clerk Theresa Bass reported that Closed Session Item No. 2 has been removed from the Closed Session agenda.

PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS: None
CLOSED SESSION: At 3:36 p.m., Mayor Aitken recessed to closed session for consideration of the following:

1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION
(Subdivision (d)(1) of Section 54956.9 of the California Government Code) Name of Case: Tina Buonanno v. City of Anaheim; OCSC Case No. 30-2023-01368564

2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION
(Subdivision (d)(1) of Section 54956.9 of the California Government Code) Name of Case: Jose Luis Torres Marquez v. City of Anaheim; OCSC Case No. 30-2025- 01462822

3. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
(Subdivision (a) of Section 54957.6 of the California Government Code) Agency Designated Representative: Linda Andal, Human Resources Director Name of Employee Organizations: (1) American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (General Management, Professional/Technical, and Confidential Units); (2) Anaheim Firefighters Association, Local 2899; (3) Anaheim Municipal Employees Association (General, Clerical, and Part-Time Units); (4) Anaheim Municipal Employees Association, Police Cadet Unit; (5) Anaheim Police Association; (6) Anaheim Police Management Association; (7) International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW), Local 47; (8) IBEW, Local 47 Part-Time Service Employees; (9) International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 47 (Professional Management and Part-Time Management Units) (10) Service Employees’ International Union, United Service Workers West; (11) Teamsters, Local 952 At 5:18 p.m., Mayor Pro Tem Meeks reconvened the Anaheim City Council.

MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Pro Tem Natalie Meeks and Council Members Ryan Balius, Carlos A. Leon, Natalie Rubalcava, Norma Campos Kurtz, and Kristen M. Maahs
MEMBER ABSENT: Mayor Ashleigh E. Aitken
ITEM # 13
City Council Minutes of April 22, 2025

Mayor Pro Tem Meeks noted that Mayor Aitken was not feeling well and would not be attending the remainder of the meeting.

INVOCATION: Pastor Paulo Maciel, Dwelling Place Anaheim FLAG SALUTE: Council Member Natalie Rubalcava
PRESENTATIONS: Recognizing Anaheim High School's Football Booster James Oregel Mayor Pro Tem Meeks recognized Anaheim High School Football Booster James (Jimmy) Oregel.

She shared that as a class of 1972 graduate, Mr. Oregel has stayed true to Anaheim High School and stands as the school’s most enduring booster. She added that for decades, he has been the biggest supporter of Anaheim High football and can be found selling team gear at Glover Stadium and keeping traditions alive. She thanked him for his dedication and service to the community.

Mr. Oregel thanked Betty Fee who assisted him when he started at Anaheim High School in 1969. He shared that his family has been in Anaheim since 1880.

Recognizing Anaheim Union High School District Student Ambassadors and the student representative to the Board of Trustees
Mayor Pro Tem Meeks recognized the Anaheim Union High School District Student Ambassadors and the student representative to the Board of Trustees who demonstrated leadership, service, and a voice for others. She shared that the Student Ambassadors are powerful contributors to the District’s work, serving as the bridge between the schools and community. She added that the ambassadors advocate for student concerns, organize District events, and represent their entire student bodies.

She shared that their insights and contributions are valuable in shaping the policies and priorities of the District. On behalf of the City Council, she thanked them for their dedication and leadership.

The Anaheim Union High School District Student Ambassadors accepted the recognition. A student ambassador thanked the City for providing an opportunity for the ambassadors to serve their schools and serve as leaders. She added that the program serves as a great representation for young girls who are considering a similar path.

ACCEPTANCE OF OTHER RECOGNITIONS (To be presented at a later date):

Recognizing April 13 - 19, 2025, as California Mosquito Awareness Week Recognizing April 25, 2025 as National Arbor Day
Recognizing April 2025, as Arts, Culture, & Creativity Month Recognizing April and May 2025, as Affordable and Fair Housing Months Recognizing May 2025, as Water Awareness Month
Public Utilities Associate Engineer Michelle Chavez accepted the recognition. She shared that she began her career as a student intern and now manages infrastructure projects for the benefit of the community. She reported Anaheim Public Utilities will be hosting an education celebration on May 1st with 200 Danbrook Elementary School students. She shared that the students will observe a pipe tapping demonstration and learn about the importance of water conservation. She added that the event is open to all residents and will take place at the Downtown Farmers Market. She added that Water Awareness Month is an opportunity to encourage residents and businesses to participate in City Council Minutes of April 22, 2025

rebates and sustainability programs to preserve water resources. She noted that Anaheim has reduced its annual water consumption by 30% over the past twenty years. For additional information, she invited everyone to visit Anaheim.net/bewatersmart.

At 5:30 p.m., Mayor Pro Tem Meeks called to order the Anaheim Housing Authority, in joint session with the Anaheim City Council.

ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDAS: City Clerk Theresa Bass reported that Item No. 09 was withdrawn at the request of staff and will be brought back at a later date.

PUBLIC COMMENTS (all agenda items, except public hearings): Prior to receipt of public comments, City Clerk Theresa Bass provided an outline of procedures for public comments, notice of translation services, and a brief decorum statement.

City Clerk Theresa Bass reported that a total of eight (8) public comments were received electronically prior to 1:30 p.m. [A final total of eight (8) public comments were received electronically, distributed to the City Council, and made part of the official records]. – See Appendix.

Vern Nelson addressed the City Council on Item 21 in support of Assembly Bill (AB) 63. He encouraged the City Council to support bills that will reduce homelessness and displacement. He explained that the Tenant Protection Act of 2019 does not have an enforcement mechanism and allows rents to be increased up to 10% each year, and excluded properties protected by the Costa- Hawkins Rental Housing Act. He encouraged the City Council to support AB 1157, the Affordable Rent Act, which lowers the annual rent increases from 10% to 5% or the cost of living plus 2%, covers more rental properties, and makes the Tenant Protection Act of 2019 permanent. He clarified that Tenants United Anaheim is not against landlords who care for their tenants. He explained that landlords are often corporations that take advantage of tenants.

R. Joshua Collins thanked the City Council for everything they have done for unhoused individuals who attend the meeting. He requested a way for individuals who are unable to attend to connect with the Housing and Community Development Department. He requested additional information on Item 12 and inquired how long until property is removed from a public space. He shared that shelter beds are not available through City Net. He emphasized the need for affordable housing and lower rental costs for the community. He requested information on how to work directly with the City to assist unhoused individuals.

Jeanine Robbins criticized the City Council’s consideration to renew a contract with Visit Anaheim.

She requested the audit of Visit Anaheim with verified documentation. She explained that Visit Anaheim was named multiple times in the JL Group report and worked alongside the Chamber of Commerce. She requested reports on Visit Anaheim’s marketing of the City and sales generated from conventions. She recommended that the City Council vote against the agreement with Visit Anaheim.

Mike Robbins noted that Visit Anaheim was mentioned 191 times in the JL report. He proposed replacing Visit Anaheim or providing the service in-house and using the extra funds to balance the budget. He suggested using the additional funds to sustain the Resort industry. He commented on security checkpoints at City Hall. He emphasized the importance of everyone, including Council Members and staff, going through the security checkpoints for everyone’s protection.

Kenneth Batiste commented on the mention of Visit Anaheim in the JL Group report and raised concerns about special interests in the City. He noted that the public turns to the City Council for help due to the lack of assistance from others. He criticized promises of campaign reform with no changes so far. He stated he was a process server and served Council Member Rubalcava.

City Council Minutes of April 22, 2025

Cecil Jordan Corkern shared that he was working on reports to end child trafficking. He expressed concern over sexual harassment at Disney and Disney’s television programming.

Duane Roberts urged the City Council to support Assembly Bill 1157 to strengthen the 2019 law protecting apartment dwellers from rent increases. He noted that corporate landlords increase rents to their legal maximums, placing the burden on working-class tenants. He added that the law is set to expire in 2030 and will leave millions of Californians vulnerable to rent increases, mass evictions, displacement, and homelessness. He explained that AB 1157 will reduce allowable annual rent increases to 2% above the inflation rate with a 5% maximum, expand coverage to include single- family homes, condominiums, accessory dwelling units, and townhomes, and make Statewide rent control permanent. He requested an update on records he requested in August 2024.

Mark Richard Daniels commented on former Mayor Sidhu’s sentencing and the shutdown of the Chamber of Commerce. He requested that the JL Group be fully released to the public. He requested accountability and transparency for the public. He urged the City Council to take a stand.

Matthew Duncan wished the City Council a Happy Earth Day. He provided a brochure from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife on coexisting with coyotes. He reported that the City is in violation of State law for using rodent poison that is banned. He recommended that the City notify its pest management services.

Bryan Kaye commented on a recent Police Review Board meeting and concerns that were raised about street racing. He requested that the City Council address the public’s petition.

Graciela Arzola requested information on how the City is preventing gentrification following zoning changes. She shared that the homeless population has increased and questioned how the City Council is helping unhoused individuals. She inquired if the City is working with the County or other partners or looking into Laura’s Law.

Marc Herbert reported that he met with families evicted from Walnut Street Apartments. He commented on the City’s budget forecast and reduced State and federal funding for housing. He criticized the City’s public engagement during the Housing Element process. He reported that he will conclude his comments during the public hearing.

COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS:

Council Member Balius thanked the police and fire departments for their support at the Eggstravaganza last Saturday. He also thanked the police department for arresting a “pimp” on Beach Boulevard.

Council Member Maahs highlighted and shared photographs of events she attended, including the Anaheim Public Utilities 35th Annual Water Conservation Art Program held on Wednesday, April 9th at the Honda Center. She stated the event was supported by the Anaheim Ducks, and it was great to see students applying their knowledge of water conservation through art. That same day, she attended an art exhibition in District 5 at Sunkist Elementary School. The event was facilitated by Villages of California, an organization that offers prevention and mental health services for all ages.

The students created art displaying what peace means to them, and she thanked them for sharing their art with everyone. On April 13th, she attended the Anaheim Hills Rotary Club’s 15th Annual Easter celebration. The event is supported primarily by volunteers. City staff, Fire and Rescue, and Community Services, attended the event and provided resources for attendees. On April 17, Council Member Maahs attended the ribbon cutting and grand reopening ceremony of Republic Services’ Anaheim Recycling Center. A fire closed the facility for three years, and the rebuild and expansion has the latest in efficient technology for processing recyclable materials. Council Member Maahs City Council Minutes of April 22, 2025

attended the Miraloma Park & Family Resource Center's Easter celebration on April 17. She recognized Community Services Coordinator Teresa Rodriguez for the remarkable job she does at serving the neighborhood, providing mentorship to staff, and recognizing the needs of the community.

Council Member Maahs announced that there will be additional stops for OCTA Route 553, including ARTIC, Katella Avenue, State College Boulevard, Haster Street, Harbor Boulevard, and Disneyland.

She stated the additional stops may be helpful for Anaheim residents who work in the Resort District.

Council Member Rubalcava highlighted and shared photographs of events she attended, including the Second Annual Easter Basket Extravaganza event at Mondragon Family Market. Mondragon Family Market is a business that has been in Anaheim for 40 years and she thanked the business owners who brought the community together. She thanked Anaheim Public Utilities, Fire and Rescue, the Police Department, Neighborhood Services, and the Anaheim Police Association for attending the event and providing resources to the community. In recognition of Earth Day, she attended a tree planting event sponsored by Anaheim Public Utilities at Benjamin Franklin Elementary School.

Planting the tree helped the students understand the benefits of taking care of the planet and the environment. She shared that Congressman Lou Correa, his staff, and Anaheim High Alumni Association Member Janet Brown attended Benjamin Franklin Elementary School. Council Member Rubalcava shared that in collaboration with the Anaheim YMCA and City Church, 500 members of the community attended an egg hunt at Center Greens. She emphasized District 3’s park-rich nature and she commended Community Services Director Sjany Larson-Cash and her team for all the things they do throughout the City. Council Member Rubalcava highlighted the beautification projects at La Palma Park and the efforts to address the unhoused population issue. She noted that a lot of people who were unhoused and residing at La Palma Park have been helped. The Anaheim Police Department HALO team, in collaboration with Public Works, Community Services, Neighborhood Services, and Housing and Community Development provide opportunities for the unhoused populations to identify services that are within the City. She clarified that during the Public Comment portion of the meeting, it is the public's opportunity to address Council and to speak freely if comments are delivered in a respectful manner. She noted that Council does not ignore concerns addressed during public comments, but it is not their turn to speak. Council Member Rubalcava encouraged everyone with questions to reach out to City staff or email City Council Members directly.

Her email address is [email protected] and the email addresses for other Council Members can be found at www.Anaheim.net. She thanked all the members of the public who attended the meeting for addressing their issues and concerns.

Council Member Leon thanked City Engineer Carlos Castellanos and the Public Works team for securing OCTA M2 funding for Anaheim’s Project O (Regional Capacity Program) and Project P (Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program) applications. The City of Anaheim will receive approximately $900,000 for Lincoln Avenue and Harbor Boulevard intersection improvements to support the right of way phase of that project, as well as $360,000 for improvements to Lincoln Avenue from Evergreen Street to State College Boulevard to support the engineering phase of the project. Funding in the amount of $3.76 million will support signal synchronization along State College Boulevard from Cliffwood Avenue to Garden Grove Boulevard. Council Member Leon provided an update on the installation of sturdier fencing in District 2 off Nutwood Street, between Katella Avenue and Cerritos Avenue to address public safety and homelessness concerns. He noted that the area is slated to be a future park for the City. He stated that it is a continuous effort, and he thanked all the residents in that area for speaking up and for their patience. Council Member Leon highlighted and shared photographs of events he attended. He noted that April 13 - 19, 2025, is California Mosquito Awareness Week, and he reminded everyone that the Orange County Mosquito and Vector Control District offers services for mosquitoes, red imported fire ants, rats, and mosquito fish drop off. He recommended scanning the QR code on the PowerPoint slide to request an inspection and learn more about tips and tricks to prevent mosquitoes and other vectors. Council Member Leon thanked everyone who attended the Annual Children's Day Fun Fair. He shared that everyone had an City Council Minutes of April 22, 2025

amazing time, and he thanked City departments, nonprofit organizations, and the Anaheim Ducks’ Wild Wing for their participation. He thanked Fire Chief Russell for stopping by and interacting with the community. He also thanked all volunteers and the District 2 team for their efforts in making the event a reality and making it a fun event for everyone who attended. Council Member Leon attended an Autism Awareness event with Police Chief Armendariz and his team. He stated that the event was filled with heart, hope, and community. He thanked all the organizers for helping to uplift families and friends on the spectrum and for helping to build a more inclusive community, rooted in understanding, acceptance, and love. Council Member Leon joined Community Services, Public Utilities, Code Enforcement, and the Police Department for a neighborhood cleanup at Colchester Drive in District 2.

He thanked Mervin, who is a former Project S.A.Y. student who has become a strong advocate and leader for his neighborhood. He thanked Community Services for taking the lead in making a huge difference in the neighborhood and the community. Council Member Leon shared that his office will be hosting Knafeh with Carlos on April 29th at Knafeh Cafe in Little Arabia. Fire Chief Russell and Police Chief Armendariz will be attending as well. He invited all District 2 residents and business owners to stop by for a sweet treat, a conversation, to provide feedback, and to ask questions.

Council Member Leon invited everyone to the Show Off West Anaheim event at Maxwell Park on Saturday, April 26th, from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. The community event will be filled with entertainment and food, and City departments will be present to provide information and resources for the West Anaheim community.

CITY MANAGER’S UPDATE:

City Manager Vanderpool shared that as part of the City’s Rebuild Beach initiative, the City recently acquired Rainbow Inn property on the west side of town is set for demolition. This will pave the way for future development which will enhance safety, improve quality of life, and support the long-term plans in store for West Anaheim. On Saturday, May 3rd, Community Services will be hosting a community celebration of Cinco de Mayo at Center Greens Park, from 3:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. The event will be different from the previous Cinco de Mayo events held at La Palma Park due to recent construction. The community celebration will have local entertainment, two headliner bands, vendors, food trucks, community booths, as well as a kid zone and family friendly activities. For information, please call Community Services at (714) 765-5191.

At 6:27 p.m., Mayor Pro Tem Meeks recessed the Anaheim City Council to address the Anaheim Housing Authority Consent Calendar, reconvening at 6:28 p.m., for a joint public hearing with the Anaheim Housing Authority.

JOINT PUBLIC HEARING

2. This is a joint public hearing of the Anaheim Housing Authority and the Anaheim City Council, in accordance with Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, regarding the issuance by the Anaheim Housing Authority of its multifamily housing revenue bonds, in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $13,105,723, in order to assist with cost overruns for the Tampico Motel Conversion (a 32-unit permanent supportive rental housing development) located at 151 S. Cenpla Way (formerly 120 S. State College Blvd.).

City Council Action:
2-A. RESOLUTION NO. 2025-027 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM pursuant to Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 approving the issuance of bonds by the Anaheim Housing Authority for the Tampico Motel Conversion.

City Council Minutes of April 22, 2025

Housing Authority Action:
2-B. RESOLUTION NO. AHA-2025-001 A RESOLUTION OF THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE ANAHEIM HOUSING AUTHORITY authorizing the execution and delivery of its multifamily housing revenue note in one or more series in a cumulative and aggregate principal amount not to exceed $13,105,723 for the purpose of financing the acquisition and rehabilitation of the Tampico Motel Conversion Multifamily Rental Housing Project; approving and authorizing the execution and delivery of any and all documents necessary to execute and deliver the note, substantially in the form approved hereby, complete the transaction and implement this resolution, and ratifying and approving any action heretofore taken in connection with the note.

Director of Housing and Community Development/Executive Director of the Anaheim Housing Authority Grace Ruiz-Stepter reported that the item is a two-part request, one for action by the City Council authorizing the issuance of bonds in support of the development of the Tampico Motel, and the second authorizing the Housing Authority to issue the bonds. She noted that the bonds are a necessary part of the financing package to complete the full renovation of the Tampico project. She outlined the proposed project timeline, noting that the Housing Authority acquired the site in April 2023, a Request for Proposal (RFP) was solicited, and Jamboree Housing Corporation was selected as the developer. She added that the City attempted to complete the financing package through a Tax Credit Allocation under the 4% tax credit program in August 2023. She noted the program allows for tax credits and bond financing. She explained that the bond financing was used for the first part of the project development to help fund construction. She reported that the tax credit will be used to pay the bonds and other financing. She noted that in addition to the funding from the State, there is over $6 million in Housing Authority contributions and money from CalOptima.

Director Ruiz-Stepter reported that the purchase of the site was made possible by a $5.5 million earmark from the State, from Senator Tom Umberg’s office. She explained that the Housing Authority site was declared surplus land and available competitively to developers. She noted the City was awarded the tax credits and was now ready to proceed, with authorization, to begin the construction of the full remodel of the site. She displayed an aerial image of the 0.5-acre site. She reported that the site will include 31 units of restricted affordable units for transitional age youth, ages 18 to 24. She clarified that the units are advertised as one-bedroom units but are similar to studio apartments with 250 square feet of living space in each of the units. She added that the site is under renovation, where units are being removed to ensure that the site has a common space and space for supportive services.

Director Ruiz-Stepter reported that the public hearing is required under the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (TEFRA) to ensure that public input is considered during the process. She noted that the purpose of the hearing is to approve bond financing for the private equity in the project and to assist in securing the bond financing needed. She explained that the amount of bond financing issued is not to exceed $13.1 million.

Director Ruiz-Stepter reported that once the bonds and tax credits are secured, an Affordable Housing Agreement and related documents will be executed. She noted construction is expected to begin in mid-June, with construction slated to take approximately 18 months. She shared that the estimated completion date for the site is September 2026. She displayed a conceptual view of the site, noting staff are seeking to transform the site by including landscaping, color, and architectural design. She noted that the primary entrance will be reconfigured from State College Boulevard for residential use.

City Council Minutes of April 22, 2025

At 6:35 p.m., Vice-Chairperson/Mayor Pro Tem Meeks opened the public hearing.

Paul Hyek proposed that the developer maintain the site as walk-in/walk-out. He noted that there are two Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) bus stops. He suggested that the developer hire unhoused individuals with trade experience to build and maintain the site. He suggested conducting background checks on union laborers.

Melinda Niekum, a District 3 resident and member of Tenants United Anaheim, shared her experience regarding an eviction she experienced at Romneya Mobile Estates, where she resided for the past 25 years. She explained that due to a medical and employment emergency, her family received a three-day pay-or-quit notice. She noted that she provided the full amount to the management company eight days later, who refused the funds and continued with the eviction process. She added that the court sided with the owners of Romneya Mobile Estates. She reported that Senate Bill (SB) 436, the Keeping Californians Housed Act, would have prevented the eviction, which prevents displacement and homelessness of tenants during the eviction process if the tenant can pay back the rent. She explained that currently, tenants can be evicted with three days' notice even if they can pay the rent back.

Vice-Chairperson/Mayor Pro Tem Meeks requested that Ms. Niekum relate her comments to the public hearing. In response to Vice-Chairperson/Mayor Pro Tem Meeks, Ms. Niekum confirmed her comments are general and not related to the public hearing.

Ms. Niekum concluded her comments by urging the public and the Council to support SB 436.

R. Joshua Collins encouraged the City Council/Anaheim Housing Authority to move forward with the project. He shared that the City still requires more walk-in shelters. He referenced previous lawsuits and money spent on litigation. He mentioned that he encouraged an individual to provide a public comment to seek assistance because there are no beds available through City Net.

Vice-Chairperson/Mayor Pro Tem Meeks requested that Mr. Collins direct his comments toward the project.

Mr. Collins encouraged the City Council/Housing Authority to support the project.

Marc Herbert inquired how the project will be funded once the site is built. He explained that, according to the mid-year budget review, the funds allocated to cover the COVID-19 deficit are expected to be fully depleted. He noted that there will be a deficit of $40 million in each of the following two fiscal years.

In response to Vice-Chairperson/Mayor Pro Tem Meeks, Mr. Herbert explained that he is referencing how the project will be funded moving forward without State and federal sources.

Vice-Chairperson/Mayor Pro Tem Meeks explained that the public hearing is being considered for the specified project and asked if Mr. Herbert could relate his comments accordingly.

Mr. Herbert continued his comments, explaining that $16 million was allocated for housing and homelessness. He noted that current projections show that funding for that category has decreased.

He requested an explanation on how the tenants of the project will be funded, given the budget projections. He explained that State and federal resources are dwindling and suggested that the City implement an entertainment tax. He shared that the presentation should outline the proposed rents and how the rents will be funded, and where the funds will originate. He requested that the City evaluate the process for public engagement to have a dialogue to address community concerns.

City Council Minutes of April 22, 2025

Secretary/City Clerk Theresa Bass reported that a total of one (1) public comment was received electronically prior to 5:00 p.m. related to the joint public hearing. [A final total of one (1) public comment was received electronically, distributed to the Governing Board of the Anaheim Housing Authority/City Council, and made part of the official records]. – See Appendix.

At 6:49 p.m., Vice-Chairperson/Mayor Pro Tem Meeks closed the public hearing.

DISCUSSION: Authority Member/Council Member Maahs noted the project was addressed at a recent community meeting. She requested clarification on whether the City or the Housing Authority is at risk of default for the bonds and the impact on the City’s budget.

Director Ruiz-Stepter confirmed that tax credits from the State help fund the bond issued during the construction phase. She noted the Authority has committed $6.6 million in long-term gap financing and a Project-Based Voucher for the rents and property management services. She explained that those details are embedded into the financing with escalators to protect against default. She reported that the actions are carried out under the legal authority of the Housing Authority, which also protects the City. She explained that staff carefully plan the financing of developments, which is why RFPs are issued to select a developer. She noted that Jamboree Housing Corporation is an experienced developer not only in construction but in long-term financing and property management.

Authority Member/Council Member Maahs thanked staff and expressed residents' gratitude for the project.

In response to Authority Member/Council Member Kurtz, Director Ruiz-Stepter noted that the bonds are sold to obtain the construction money for the developer rather than the developer going to a private bank for a pre-construction loan with high interest rates. She explained that once construction is complete, to address permanent financing, the City accesses the tax equity to pay the bonds in combination with the rent paid by the tenants.

Authority Member/Council Member Kurtz expressed her support for the project.

In response to Authority Member/Council Member Kurtz, Director Ruiz-Stepter confirmed that all 31 units will assist youth leaving the foster care system. She highlighted Orangewood Foundation as a partner for support services for the project. She referenced the accessibility of public transportation near the site to access local schools, job centers, and the Resort.

In response to Authority Member/Council Member Kurtz, Director Ruiz-Stepter confirmed that Orangewood Foundation would serve as a supportive services partner to assist youth in finding employment to help pay rent and find housing before they age out of the development. She highlighted Orangewood Foundation’s work in helping children exit the foster care system to become self-sufficient, find educational opportunities, and engage in the workforce.

Authority Member/Council Member Rubalcava commended staff on the project. She highlighted former Council Member Faessel’s efforts and contributions towards the project. She requested additional information on the requirements to reside at the property and whether individuals require an Anaheim connection. Director Ruiz-Stepter confirmed that an Anaheim connection is required for all of the City’s affordable housing products and programs. She explained that the connection can be established through residence in the City, enrollment at Anaheim schools, or working within the City limits. She confirmed that the residents would be aging out of the foster care system and with a connection to the City. She noted that the City hosts Covenant House, which includes a number of Anaheim-connected transitional age youth. She added that staff also engage with the Anaheim Union High School District.

City Council Minutes of April 22, 2025

In response to Authority Member/Council Member Rubalcava, Director Ruiz-Stepter reported that vouchers are allocated to the site, and part of the vetting process is that Housing Authority staff collect income requirements and verify the connection to the City.

In response to Authority Member/Council Member Rubalcava, Director Ruiz-Stepter confirmed that tenants will be responsible for monthly rental payments. She noted that contributions are required for all of the City’s affordable housing. She explained that if tenants move in without employment, the Section 8 voucher will cover their rent payments. She noted that the intention is to connect tenants with supportive services for education and job training. She explained that once employed, 30% of their income will be dedicated to their rent contribution.

Authority Member/Council Member Rubalcava requested information on similar projects for transitional housing and lower-income projects.

Director Ruiz-Stepter highlighted the El Verano low-income development located on Lincoln Avenue for homeless seniors who have exited shelters. She highlighted Rockwood also located on Lincoln Avenue, for families experiencing homelessness with children connected to Anaheim schools. She also highlighted the first motel conversion property, Esperanza permanent supportive housing, and the Azure development located off Harbor and the 91 freeway, which is currently in development.

Authority Member/Council Member Rubalcava expressed her appreciation for the Housing and Community Development department for their support of vulnerable populations in Anaheim.

Vice-Chairperson/Mayor Pro Tem Meeks highlighted the project, which assists a vulnerable population with a pathway to independence and adulthood.

Vice-Chairperson/Mayor Pro Tem Meeks noted the action will be voted upon separately by the two governing bodies, beginning with the City Council.

City Council Action:

MOTION: Council Member Kurtz moved to approve RESOLUTION NO. 2025-027 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM pursuant to Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 approving the issuance of bonds by the Anaheim Housing Authority for the Tampico Motel Conversion, seconded by Council Member Rubalcava. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES – 6 (Mayor Pro Tem Meeks and Council Members Balius, Leon, Rubalcava, Kurtz, and Maahs); NOES – 0; ABSENT – 1 (Mayor Aitken). Motion carried.

Housing Authority Action:

MOTION: Authority Member Maahs moved to approve RESOLUTION NO. AHA-2025-001

A RESOLUTION OF THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE ANAHEIM HOUSING AUTHORITY authorizing the execution and delivery of its multifamily housing revenue note in one or more series in a cumulative and aggregate principal amount not to exceed $13,105,723 for the purpose of financing the acquisition and rehabilitation of the Tampico Motel Conversion Multifamily Rental Housing Project; approving and authorizing the execution and delivery of any and all documents necessary to execute and deliver the note, substantially in the form approved hereby, complete the transaction and implement this resolution, and ratifying and approving any action heretofore taken in connection with the note, seconded by Authority Member Kurtz. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES – 6 (Vice-Chairperson Meeks and Authority Members Balius, Leon, Rubalcava, Kurtz, and Maahs); NOES – 0; ABSENT – 1 (Chairperson Aitken). Motion carried.

City Council Minutes of April 22, 2025

At 7:02 p.m., Mayor Pro Tem Meeks adjourned the Anaheim Housing Authority to address the Anaheim City Council Consent Calendar.

CONSENT CALENDAR: The Consent Calendar was considered with Council Member Rubalcava pulling Item Nos. 12, 13, and 14 for separate consideration. Council Member Balius recorded a recusal for Item No. 7 due to a conflict of real property interest as his residence is within 300 feet from the proposed project site and an abstention for Item No. 17.

MOTION: Council Member Kurtz moved to waive reading of all ordinances and resolutions and adopt the balance of the consent calendar as presented in accordance with reports, certifications, and recommendations furnished each City Council Member, seconded by Council Member Leon. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES – 6 (Mayor Pro Tem Meeks and Council Members Balius, Leon, Rubalcava, Kurtz, and Maahs); NOES – 0; ABSENT – 1 (Mayor Aitken). Motion carried. [Item No. 7: Council Member Balius recorded a recusal for Item No. 7 due to a conflict of real property interest as his residence is within 300 feet from the proposed project site. MOTION: Council Member Kurtz moved to approve the Consent Calendar, seconded by Council Member Leon. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES – 5 (Mayor Pro Tem Meeks and Council Members Leon, Rubalcava, Kurtz, and Maahs); NOES – 0; ABSTAIN (Recusal) – 1 (Council Member Balius); ABSENT – 1 (Mayor Aitken). Motion carried]. [Item No. 17: Council Member Balius recorded an abstention for Item No. 17. MOTION: Council Member Kurtz moved to approve the Consent Calendar, seconded by Council Member Leon. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES – 5 (Mayor Pro Tem Meeks and Council Members Leon, Rubalcava, Kurtz, and Maahs); NOES – 0; ABSTAIN – 1 (Council Member Balius); ABSENT – 1 (Mayor Aitken)].

3. Receive and file minutes of the Community Services Board meeting of March 13, 2025, Library Board meeting of March 10, 2025, and Sister City Commission meetings of November 25, 2024 and January 27, 2025.

4. Approve recognition recognizing IBEW Locals 47 and 441 for their volunteer work at the Veterans of Foreign War Post 3173.

5. Receive, file, with the possibility of discussion, the list of Professional Services Agreements authorized by the City Manager and the list of Visit Anaheim Subcontractor Agreements approved by the Executive Director of Convention, Sports, and Entertainment in March 2025.

6. Authorize the City Manager to cast a "Yes" vote for the Santiago Geologic Hazard Abatement District (SGHAD) assessment to fund ongoing operations and maintenance of the landslide mitigation system, at the SGHAD public hearing scheduled for May 12, 2025.

7. Award a construction contract to the lowest responsible bidder, PAR Western Line Contractors, LLC, in the amount of $6,879,030 plus a 10% contingency, for the Overhead Electric Reliability Improvement Project Fiscal Year 2024/25 at various locations; authorize the Director of Public Works, or designees, to execute the contract and any other related documents, including any cost-neutral amendments of the contract and any documents contemplated by the contract, and to take such actions as are necessary, required, or advisable to implement and administer the contract; determine that the Project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Sections 15301(b), 15302(c) and (d), and 15303 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; and authorize the City Council Minutes of April 22, 2025

Finance Director to execute the Escrow Agreement pertaining to contract retentions in accordance with Public Contract Code Section 22300.

Item No. 7: Council Member Balius recorded a recusal for Item No. 7 due to a conflict of real property interest as his residence is within 300 feet from the proposed project site. MOTION: Council Member Kurtz moved to approve the Consent Calendar, seconded by Council Member Leon. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES – 5 (Mayor Pro Tem Meeks and Council Members Leon, Rubalcava, Kurtz, and Maahs); NOES - 0; ABSTAIN (Recusal) - 1 (Council Member Balius); ABSENT – 1 (Mayor Aitken).

Motion carried.

8. Award the construction contract to the lowest responsible bidder, Onyx Paving Company, Inc., in the amount of $12,345,000, for the construction of the Residential Street Improvement Project – Juno & Norma – Group 18; authorize the Director of Public Works to execute the contract and any other related documents, and to take such actions as are necessary to implement and administer the contract; determine that the Project is categorically exempt from California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Sections 15301, Class 1, and 15302, Class 2, of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; and authorize and direct the Finance Director to execute the Escrow Agreement pertaining to contract retentions.

9. Approve the Agreement for Sale of Property and Joint Escrow Instructions, in substantial form, with Anaheim East Vermont, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company for the acquisition of real property located at 514-522 E. Vermont Avenue; authorize the Public Works Director to execute the agreement, and all other related documents, including the Certificate of Acceptance of Interest in Real Property and to take such actions as are necessary to implement and administer the agreement; authorize de minimis changes to the agreement that do not substantially change the terms and conditions as determined by the City Attorney’s Office; authorize the City Clerk to cause said Certificate of Acceptance of Interest in Real Property to be released to the authorized escrow agent for the recording of the Grant Deed in the Office of the County Recorder of Orange County; increase the Public Works Department’s Fiscal Year 2024/25 expenditure budget by $9,400,000 for the Sanitation Fund and $9,400,000 for the Wastewater Fund and Anaheim Public Utilities’ Electric Fund budget by $3,200,000; and find that the above actions are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15004(b)(2)(A) and 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines.

Item No. 09 was withdrawn by staff.

10. Approve a Second Amendment to Agreement with Bell Event Services Inc. to increase the not to exceed amount from $90,000 to $270,000, for sound and lighting technician services at City-owned facilities, for the six year term.

11. Waive Council Policy 4.1 and approve an agreement with Wittman Enterprises, LLC to provide emergency medical services billing services for a five year term commencing on May 1, 2025, with compensation based on a percentage of collections received from net collected revenues; and authorize the Fire Chief, or designees, to execute the agreement and any related documents, including any cost-neutral amendments and any documents contemplated by the agreement, and to take the necessary or advisable actions to implement, fund, and administer the agreement.

City Council Minutes of April 22, 2025

15. RESOLUTION NO. 2025-028 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM approving a Letter of Understanding between the Anaheim Police Management Association and the City of Anaheim to extend the December 27, 2019 through June 30, 2025 Memorandum of Understanding, and amending Resolution No. 2021-088 [extending through June 30, 2026 and approving the proposed rates of compensation and revised terms and conditions].

Increase the Police Department’s Fiscal Year 2024/25 budget in the amount of $94,700.

16. ORDINANCE NO. 6605 (ADOPTION) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM amending Section .030 of Chapter 1.05 of Title 1 of the Anaheim Municipal Code [establishes the rules for administering the City’s personnel system, including classified and exempt service positions; Introduced at the Council meeting of March 25, 2025; Item No. 23].

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-029 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM establishing the Firefighter Trainee job classification, rate of compensation, and pay policies.

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-030 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM amending the personnel rules and policies covering non-represented full- time and part-time employees, and repealing Resolution Nos. 2024-079 and 2025-002 [related to Firefighter Trainee classification and other clarifying language].

17. Approve minutes of the City Council meeting of September 24, 2024.

Item No. 17: Council Member Balius recorded an abstention for Item No. 17. MOTION: Council Member Kurtz moved to approve the Consent Calendar, seconded by Council Member Leon. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES – 5 (Mayor Pro Tem Meeks and Council Members Leon, Rubalcava, Kurtz, and Maahs); NOES – 0; ABSTAIN – 1 (Council Member Balius); ABSENT – 1 (Mayor Aitken). Motion carried.

BUSINESS CALENDAR:

12. Approve the First Amendment to Agreement with Lyons Security Service, Inc. to increase the initial annual not to exceed amount from $475,000 to $650,000, and the total contract not to exceed amount from $2,000,000 to $3,000,000, for the collection, storage, and release of abandoned property and property removed from public spaces for safekeeping; authorize the Chief of Police, or designee, to execute the First Amendment; and increase the Anaheim Police Department’s Fiscal Year 2024/25 General Fund budget by $175,000.

Chief of Police Rick Armendariz reported that the action is to increase the current contract with Lyons Security Service to increase the annual not to exceed amount from $475,000 to $650,000 and the total contract amount from $2,000,000 to $3,000,000 for the collection, storage, and release of abandoned property and property removal from public spaces. He shared that in response to the City’s restoring public spaces initiative, a coordinated effort amongst several City departments to address quality of life concerns and proactively support homelessness response efforts. He explained that the City requested that Lyons provide additional hours of service beyond what was anticipated in City Council Minutes of April 22, 2025

the original contract. He reported that support was extended to seven days a week from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. and support during evening operations to assist HALO officers (Homeless Assessment Liaison Officers). He added that Lyons has expanded coverage for nighttime calls for service during park cleanups and a dedicated overnight guard from 10 p.m. to 5 a.m. to support property pickups in City parks. He noted that the increased services align with the scope of work outlined in the Request for Proposal (RFP) and the contract. He explained that the increased contract expenditures were a result of the cleanup initiative to restore public spaces and contract use by the Community Services Department. He added that the Police Department is requesting an increase to the FY 2024/25 budget to cover the additional costs.

DISCUSSION: Council Member Rubalcava expressed concern that the contract amount has been exhausted. She requested additional information to justify the increase including how many items have been collected or the contract use.

Chief Armendariz explained that the contract was approved before the Citywide initiative was adopted. He noted that the Police Department began collaborating with Community Services, Public Works, and Utilities. He shared that APD increased the HALO team and efforts in addressing behavior to restore public spaces and increased service by Lyons to assist the HALO team, Park Rangers, and officers.

In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Chief Armendariz confirmed the Citywide initiative was adopted in September 2024.

Council Member Rubalcava requested additional information on the number of items collected and the comparison of the data following the implementation of the Citywide initiative. Police Support Services Administrator Kerrstyn Vega reported that an average of 44 items were collected in June, 151 in September, 247 in October, 224 in November, 170 in December and has been steadily increasing. She provided a background on the Department’s services with Lyons and the competitive bid process for the new contract based on prior trends from the pilot program.

In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Chief Armendariz reported that Lyons will collect the property and store it in their facilities. He shared that the Police Department will provide contact information on where and how to collect the property. He explained that Lyons is required to store the property for 90 days.

In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Police Support Services Administrator Vega reported that Lyons is required to provide their own vehicle to transport the property from the pickup locations to the storage facility. She added that Lyons is required to process the property in compliance with the Police Department’s chain of custody.

Council Member Rubalcava highlighted the services and how they complement recent ordinances adopted by the City Council prohibiting individuals from leaving items behind in public spaces. Chief Armendariz mentioned that the services complement the ordinances adopted and services provided by CCRT (Community Care Response Team).

In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Chief Armendariz shared that the Lyons staff works with patrol officers and staff to focus on restoring public spaces, allowing patrol officers to be efficient and focus on individuals, while Lyons collects and stores the property.

Council Member Rubalcava requested a memo to Council detailing the number of items collected and how often Lyons responds after 5 p.m. She asked if staff anticipated bringing the item back to the City Council to request additional contract funds. Police Support Services Administrator Vega explained City Council Minutes of April 22, 2025

that staff took an average of the costs over the last few months and accounted for potential increases in services during spring and summer. She noted that the contract includes Consumer Price Index (CPI) increases. She confirmed that the proposed amount will maintain services or account for any increases.

Council Member Rubalcava expressed that maintaining the contract amount is the best way to manage the budget. She thanked staff for the overview of the item.

Mayor Pro Tem Meeks expressed her support for the item and shared that residents have praised the program to restore public spaces.

In response to Council Member Leon, Police Support Services Administrator Vega clarified the increase will cover the contract through the June 18, 2025 termination date and any potential renewals.

MOTION: Council Member Rubalcava moved to approve the First Amendment to Agreement with Lyons Security Service, Inc. to increase the initial annual not to exceed amount from $475,000 to $650,000, and the total contract not to exceed amount from $2,000,000 to $3,000,000, for the collection, storage, and release of abandoned property and property removed from public spaces for safekeeping; authorize the Chief of Police, or designee, to execute the First Amendment; and increase the Anaheim Police Department’s Fiscal Year 2024/25 General Fund budget by $175,000, seconded by Council Member Leon. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES – 6 (Mayor Pro Tem Meeks and Council Members Balius, Leon, Rubalcava, Kurtz, and Maahs); NOES – 0; ABSENT – 1 (Mayor Aitken). Motion carried.

13. Approve the Amended and Restated Agreement, in substantial form, with the Anaheim/Orange County Visitor & Convention Bureau dba Visit Anaheim authorizing Visit Anaheim to provide the services necessary to promote Anaheim as a premier tourist and trade show/convention destination, with additional oversight by the City, with compensation paid to Visit Anaheim by the City set at an amount of 75% of the net Anaheim Tourism Improvement District assessments collected monthly by the City (the ATID assessment is equal to two percent (2%) of the nightly room rate), for a three-year term which will automatically renew annually unless the agreement is terminated pursuant to Section 21 of the agreement; authorize de minimis changes to the agreement that do not substantially change the terms and conditions as determined by the City Attorney’s Office; and authorize the Executive Director of the Convention, Sports & Entertainment Department to execute any other related documents and to take the necessary actions to implement and administer the agreement.

Executive Director of Convention, Sports & Entertainment Tom Morton reported that the City and Visit Anaheim entered into an agreement in December 1997 to authorize Visit Anaheim to provide services to promote the growth and enhancement of the community to promote and encourage visitors and tourists to visit Anaheim and promote conventions, conferences, and trade shows to be held in Anaheim. He shared that the agreement authorized payment of a portion of Anaheim’s Transient Occupancy Taxes (TOT) to Visit Anaheim for such services. He added that the City Council subsequently approved seven (7) amendments to the 1997 agreement. He reported that in 2010, following the formation of the Anaheim Tourism Improvement District (ATID), the City and Visit Anaheim entered into an Amended and Restated Agreement which increased Visit Anaheim’s annual funding by providing 75% of a 2% assessment to Visit Anaheim to further enhance Visit Anaheim’s marketing and sales efforts to attract visitors, tourists and conventions to Anaheim.

City Council Minutes of April 22, 2025

Executive Director Motion reported that in 2023-2024, the State conducted an audit, which produced recommendations to ensure better oversight of ATID funds. He noted that the Amended and Restated Agreement will continue to authorize Visit Anaheim to provide services related to the marketing of Anaheim with enhanced oversight by the City. He added that the agreement also addresses State audit recommendations including key performance indicators, including hotel occupancy rates, convention center bookings, and the number of presentations made to Convention Center executives; requiring Visit Anaheim separately track all expenditures related to the contract and prohibits Visit Anaheim from commingling ATID funds with other revenue sources; annual reports to the City on the amount of any unspent ATID funds and tourism district assessment fund reserve balances; prohibits Visit Anaheim from transferring ATID funds to another entity without the City’s prior written approval and full compliance with the subcontracting provisions of the ATID contract; and requires Visit Anaheim to develop a plan for oversight of any subcontractor and provide documentation of the oversight annually to the City. He noted that the initial term is for three years and shall automatically extend for an additional one-year term unless terminated. He added that the City can terminate the agreement without cause by providing a 180-day written notice. He reported that the consideration will not impact the General Fund as the marketing funds are derived from a 2% assessment on room rentals within the Anaheim Resort and Platinum Triangle.

DISCUSSION: Council Member Rubalcava expressed concern over Visit Anaheim’s management of ATID funds and the decline in TOT revenue. She requested information on the individuals who participated in the process. Executive Director Morton reported that he, Steve Mattas with Redwood Public Law, Assistant City Attorney Leonie Mulvihill, Mike Waterman with Visit Anaheim, and Visit Anaheim’s outside counsel participated in the process.

Council Member Rubalcava expressed concern that the contract language on page 3, line 3, limits visitors to leisure, domestic, and international. She questioned why business, travel, or other convention-related visitors were not included.

Executive Director Morton explained that the intent was to update the language and not to limit the attraction of visitors to the City.

Council Member Rubalcava shared that her concerns are due to Visit Anaheim’s current marketing towards leisure and travel amongst a more affluent population. She explained that her concern was that the language was not beneficial and limited marketing to other groups, including the business sector and youth sports. She recommended removing the language from the agreement. She requested clarification on social media contacts referenced on page 3, line 19.

Executive Director Morton reported that the social media entities referenced in the previous agreement no longer existed.

In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Chief Operating Officer of Visit Anaheim Christina Dawson explained that the social media contacts applied to all social media channels. She added that the context was removed because some social media sites no longer exist.

In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Ms. Dawson shared that social media contacts would be influencers.

Council Member Rubalcava recommended updating the language from social media contacts to influencers. She recommended updating the word housing to lodging throughout the agreement to avoid confusion. Executive Director Morton reported that the word housing is an industry-related term.

City Council Minutes of April 22, 2025

In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Executive Director Morton shared that groups will contract with housing providers to assist with hotel room blocks. Council Member Rubalcava preferred to include lodging.

Ms. Dawson shared that Visit Anaheim previously had a housing department, which is now contracted through third parties. She confirmed that “housing” is an industry term prevalent through destination marketing organizations.

Council Member Rubalcava recommended updating the term to lodging or accommodations.

Executive Director Morton confirmed the recommended revisions. Council Member Rubalcava recommended the updates on page 4, line 4 of the agreement as well.

Council Member Rubalcava requested additional information on a staffing concierge referenced on page five, lines three and four. Executive Director Morton reported that when conventions are in- house at the Convention Center, Visit Anaheim will provide a concierge to provide information about the City to guests.

In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Executive Director Morton explained that Visit Anaheim has been providing the concierge services to the assessed properties. He confirmed that the concierge was scheduled personnel and the update to the agreement is to update terminology with no impact on costs to Visit Anaheim.

Council Member Rubalcava requested additional clarification on the removal of hotels and facilities being used on page 5, line 21. Executive Director Morton clarified that previously, hotels needed to be booked in conjunction with the Convention Center for meeting room space, which is no longer required.

In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Executive Director Morton explained that Visit Anaheim has the right to book space at the Convention Center and not at any hotels. He confirmed that Visit Anaheim did not have the rights prior; however, hotels were used due to a lack of space at the Convention Center. Council Member Rubalcava recommended including the language. She inquired if staff consulted with the City’s ATID partners. Executive Director Morton reported that the contract is between the City and Visit Anaheim. He noted that Visit Anaheim continues to contact the hotels regarding room blocks and excess space; however, they do not have the right to book.

Council Member Rubalcava expressed concern that smaller hotels are not being included in the process. She requested to continue the item to gather feedback from the ATID partners. She explained that the audit confirmed that the funds are public taxpayer dollars that are distributed to the ATID partners.

In response to Council Member Kurtz, Ms. Dawson confirmed that funds contributed by Garden Grove to the TID will be separate. She clarified that Visit Anaheim’s efforts are dedicated to visitors staying in the City and extending the length of their stay by recommending other attractions to them.

She noted that collaborating with other organizations can encourage visitors to stay longer. She added that the other entities are paid separately and pay additional fees for their participation.

Council Member Kurtz requested confirmation that reported ATID expenditures are separate from funds for the Garden Grove TID. Ms. Dawson confirmed that, effective January 1, 2025, Visit Anaheim implemented a fund accounting system that separates the ATID, Garden Grove TID, and private funding. She added that initiatives impact both TIDs; a percentage is paid by each of the corresponding TIDs that is commensurate with their contributions to the overall funding. Executive Director Morton explained that the system was a recommendation from the State audit.

City Council Minutes of April 22, 2025

In response to Council Member Kurtz, Ms. Dawson reported that the annual report does not include individual line items for the TID’s. She noted that Visit Anaheim reviewed each TID to ensure the funding is allocated appropriately.

Council Member Kurtz expressed her interest in following the money the City’s hotels pay into and tracking the expenditures. Ms. Dawson shared that the majority of the funds are from the ATID.

Executive Director Morton added that a breakdown will be included in the annual report to reflect Anaheim-specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). He added that fund accounting and job cost accounting will outline allocations for revenues and expenses.

Council Member Rubalcava expressed concern with including economic development as a KPI. She inquired how economic impact would be measured. Ms. Dawson explained that the calculation is from Visit Anaheim’s parent organization, Destinations International. She noted that an economic calculator is used based on convention delegates. She clarified that the information is received from Destinations International.

Council Member Rubalcava expressed concern that the measurement will not be representative of success. She noted that TOT revenue and business success can measure the success of the marketing. She recommended removing economic development as a KPI. Executive Director Morton explained that it is one measure amongst a variety of KPIs in the contract. He noted that there are more specific KPIs included, including room bookings.

In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Ms. Dawson reported that room nights and the number of conventions booked are documented. She added that Visit Anaheim conducts a sales audit and annual CPA (Certified Public Accountant) audit to ensure accurate numbers. She explained that the calculations are applied to those numbers.

In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Ms. Dawson explained that community engagement is strictly volunteer hours for 501(c)(3)’s, specifically within the City. She shared that the Visit Anaheim team is asked to volunteer a minimum of 7 ½ hours each year to each organization. She added that workforce development is to develop a workforce to sustain industry jobs within the Resort District.

Council Member Rubalcava recommended removing community engagement as a KPI from the contract.

In response to Council Member Leon, Executive Director Morton reported that the Amended and Restated Agreement was being presented as a result of the State Audit recommendations. He confirmed that the five State Audit recommendations were included in the agreement. He added that the redlined changes were included to reflect the updates made pursuant to the State Audit.

Council Member Leon inquired if the agreement includes updates not related to the State Audit.

Executive Director Morton confirmed that additional updates were included to update terminology.

In response to Council Member Leon, City Attorney Fabela reported that de minimis changes are non-substantive changes that do not change the meaning of the contract.

Council Member Leon suggested additional clarifications on the proposed updates for transparency purposes. He requested additional information on the three year term for the agreement.

Outside Counsel, Steve Mattas with Redwood Public Law, reported that the initial contract was for a three year term with an automatic renewal provision, with a termination clause for either party. He City Council Minutes of April 22, 2025

noted that the proposed agreement includes a termination for convenience provision. He explained that the three-year term reflects the structure of the initial agreement.

In response to Council Member Leon, Mr. Mattas clarified that the original agreement would automatically renew unless the contract was terminated.

Council Member Leon inquired if feedback was solicited from other parties. Executive Director Morton confirmed that the contract was shared between the negotiating parties, similar to the original agreement.

In response to Council Member Leon, Executive Director Morton reported that the State Audit had recommended that the City approve the agreement several months earlier. He shared that there were discussions and negotiations that took time.

Council Member Leon expressed concern over the three-year term and automatic renewals. He suggested that the contract is reviewed annually to verify that the metrics have been met to renew the contract.

Mayor Pro Tem Meeks recommended keeping the language in the agreement broad to avoid restricting the City’s options, including the use of the word “influencers”. She shared that the important KPIs for the agreement include TOT and use of Convention Center space and conventions in the City. She inquired about the termination options for the proposed agreement.

Executive Director Morton reported that the agreement includes a termination for cause with the ability to cure within 30 days and a termination without cause, which is 180 days. Mayor Pro Tem Meeks commented that a shorter termination clause would make it difficult for the City to find a replacement for the services. She expressed her support for the termination options.

In response to Council Member Maahs, Executive Director Morton reported that the KPIs include economic impact of conventions, conferences, and trade shows; marketing impressions; partnership revenue; number of booked conventions and trade shows held at the Convention Center; community engagement; and Visit Anaheim will provide the City room nights booked, event attendance, hotel occupancy rates for hotels within the ATID boundaries; and the number of presentations made to meeting clients. He noted that the new KPIs were included in the proposed agreement. Mr. Mattas added that five of the KPIs were included as a result of the State Audit.

Council Member Maahs inquired how the City measures marketing results. Executive Director Morton explained that the KPIs would measure the marketing results. He explained that the current agreement does not include a measurement factor.

Council Member Balius expressed his support for broad language in the agreement to market the City to all individuals. He noted the importance of including the State Audit’s recommendations for transparency in the proposed agreement. He expressed his support to include “housing” since the word is an industry term. He explained that TOT is a key performance indicator for the agreement. He expressed his support for the proposed terms of the agreement.

MOTION: Council Member Rubalcava moved to continue the item to a future Council meeting in include updates to the agreement on page 3 of the redline version of the agreement, lines 3 and 4, deleting the words “leisure domestic and international”; page 3, lines 19 and 20 changing “social media contact” to “social media communications”; on page 4 and other pages changing the word “housing” to “lodging”; on Page 5, lines 21 and 22, reinserting the term “This shall also apply for hotel City Council Minutes of April 22, 2025

and motel facilities to be used”; on page 7 removing performance indicator roman numeral (i) and roman numeral (v) community engagement.

DISCUSSION: City Attorney Fabela requested clarification on the motion. Council Member Rubalcava confirmed the motion would direct staff to return with an updated agreement to include proposed updates. She requested engagement from smaller hotels to review the agreement.

Council Member Rubalcava requested that, for the future, the proposed changes as a result of the audit are highlighted, compared to providing a red line for the entire agreement. She highlighted the importance of transparency on what the City is accomplishing through the agreement. She expressed concern with excluding contractors from the agreement.

In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Mayor Pro Tem Meeks explained that the State Audit recommended that Visit Anaheim request City Manager’s Office approval before entering into subcontractor agreements. She added that the agreement removed the authority for Visit Anaheim to enter into pass-through agreements.

Mr. Mattas confirmed that the subcontracting language was included due to the State Audit and intended to establish a process for approval of the subcontracts and requirements for subcontractors.

He noted that the proposed agreement includes additional detail on subcontractor oversight.

Council Member Rubalcava requested that any future updates address the State Audit recommendations. Mr. Mattas explained that additional updates were included to update insurance requirements to the City’s standard. He inquired if the Council would prefer that the updates are outlined to identify the State Audit recommendations and separately identify additional updates not related to the State Audit.

In response to Mayor Pro Tem Meeks, Council Member Rubalcava clarified that her motion would be to remove or broaden the language on Visit Anaheim’s marketing.

City Attorney Fabela confirmed that the motion can be to continue the item, including the changes requested by Council Member Rubalcava. He outlined the proposed changes including on page 3 of the redline version of the agreement, lines 3 and 4, deleting the words “leisure domestic and international”; page 3, lines 19 and 20 changing “social media contact” to “social media communications”; on page 4 and other pages changing the word “housing” to “lodging”; on Page 5, lines 21 and 22, reinserting the term “This shall also apply for hotel and motel facilities to be used”; on page 7 removing performance indicator roman numeral (i) and roman numeral (v) community engagement.

Council Member Kurtz requested clarification on whether “lodging” would be included in the agreement.

Council Member Rubalcava recommended modifying the language. Executive Director Morton clarified that the term in the current agreement was carried over.

Council Member Rubalcava requested that ATID contributors be notified and provided an opportunity to review the proposed agreement.

City Attorney Fabela clarified that the continuation would be to an uncertain date based on staff’s ability to make updates and engage with hoteliers.

City Council Minutes of April 22, 2025

Council Member Rubalcava requested that when the item is brought back, the changes based on the audit recommendations be outlined.

Council Member Balius suggested leaving roman numeral (v) in the proposed agreement. Council Member Rubalcava explained that she recommended removing community engagement because it would not be a KPI that would generate TOT revenue.

Mr. Mattas explained that the KPIs recommended by the State Audit were included on page 7, beginning with the second sentence, including Anaheim room nights booked, event attendance, hotel occupancy rates for hotel within ATID boundaries, number of presentations made to meeting planners, and available Anaheim tourist data. Executive Director Morton added that the other KPIs are listed in the current agreement.

Council Member Leon requested that the motion include additional consideration on the agreement’s three-year term and the possibility of updating the term to one year without automatic renewals.

MOTION: Council Member Rubalcava moved to continue the item to a future Council meeting in include updates to the agreement on page 3 of the redline version of the agreement, lines 3 and 4, deleting the words “leisure domestic and international”; page 3, lines 19 and 20 changing “social media contact” to “social media communications”; on page 4 and other pages changing the word “housing” to “lodging”; on Page 5, lines 21 and 22, reinserting the term “This shall also apply for hotel and motel facilities to be used”; on page 7 removing performance indicator roman numeral (i) and roman numeral (v) community engagement, and update the agreement to a one year term, seconded by Council Member Leon.

DISCUSSION: In response to Council Member Kurtz, Executive Director Morton confirmed that the City Council will receive an annual audit report outlining the key indicators.

In response to Council Member Kurtz, Council Member Leon clarified that the City Council would review the audit information and KPIs to approve a renewal.

Mayor Pro Tem Meeks expressed concern over a one-year term. She explained that conventions are booked several years in advance. She questioned the timeline for advertising a new contract to replace the entity if the agreement is not renewed.

Council Member Rubalcava inquired if the agreement needs to be advertised for bids.

In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Mr. Mattas reported that the three-year term and automatic renewals is consistent with the current agreement and includes the termination with and without cause provisions. He added that the Council will receive an annual report on Visit Anaheim.

He explained that if the Council determines that the performance is not satisfactory, the Council has the option to invoke the termination clauses. He noted that finding a replacement contractor for the services, given their unique nature, may take time.

In response to Council Member Leon, Ms. Dawson reported that the 1997 agreement’s term was 30 years, which was set to expire in 2040. Executive Director Morton clarified that the 2010 agreement was presented when the ATID took effect. He added that the proposed agreement was modeled after the 2010 agreement, which included a three-year term and automatic renewals.

Council Member Leon explained that from a transparency and accountability perspective, to ensure that Visit Anaheim is fulfilling their contract responsibilities and ensuring that public dollars are being used correctly and effectively.

City Council Minutes of April 22, 2025

Mayor Pro Tem Meeks expressed concern with a one-year agreement, which could leave the City without services or convention bookings.

City Attorney Fabela explained that the three-year term was carried over from the current agreement.

He noted that the proposed agreement includes a termination without cause provision for either party to terminate the agreement with six months’ notice. He explained that with a three-year agreement the termination clause can still be exercised.

Council Member Rubalcava repeated her original motion
MOTION: Council Member Rubalcava moved to continue the item to a future Council meeting in include updates to the agreement on page 3 of the redline version of the agreement, lines 3 and 4, deleting the words “leisure domestic and international”; page 3, lines 19 and 20 changing “social media contact” to “social media communications”; on page 4 and other pages changing the word “housing” to “lodging”; on Page 5, lines 21 and 22, reinserting the term “This shall also apply for hotel and motel facilities to be used”; on page 7 removing performance indicator roman numeral (i) and roman numeral (v) community engagement, seconded by Council Member Leon. ROLL CALL VOTE:

AYES – 5 (Mayor Pro Tem Meeks and Council Members Leon, Rubalcava, Kurtz, and Maahs); NOES – 1 (Council Member Balius); ABSENT – 1 (Mayor Aitken). Motion carried.

14. Approve a hiring incentive to attract qualified lateral Police Dispatcher II candidates, effective April 22, 2025 through July 1, 2026.

Council Member Rubalcava shared that she will not support the item. She explained that the City should be compensating dispatchers better as opposed to incentivizing others to come work for the City. She acknowledged concerns about dispatchers' workloads, their sense of support, and compensation compared to other agencies. She expressed her support for increasing dispatchers’ pay instead of incentivizing outside parties.

MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Meeks moved to approve a hiring incentive to attract qualified lateral Police Dispatcher II candidates, effective April 22, 2025 through July 1, 2026, seconded by Council Member Kurtz. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES – 5 (Mayor Pro Tem Meeks and Council Members Balius, Leon, Kurtz, and Maahs); NOES – 1 (Council Member Rubalcava); ABSENT – 1 (Mayor Aitken). Motion carried.

18. Receive a progress report on Strategic Plan Anaheim 2024-2034 and provide staff direction as needed.

Council Member Leon requested to continue the item to the next City Council meeting when the Mayor is present.

MOTION: Council Member Leon moved to continue the item to the Council meeting of May 13, 2025, seconded by Council Member Maahs. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES – 6 (Mayor Pro Tem Meeks and Council Members Balius, Leon, Rubalcava, Kurtz, and Maahs); NOES – 0; ABSENT – 1 (Mayor Aitken).

City Council Minutes of April 22, 2025

19. Consider appointment to Housing and Community Development Commission to serve a term ending December 31, 2028.

Housing and Community Development Commission
District 5 appointment: Felipa Penaloza (December 31, 2028) NOMINATION: Council Member Maahs nominated Felipa Penaloza. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES - 6 (Mayor Pro Tem Meeks and Council Members Balius, Leon, Rubalcava, Kurtz, and Maahs); NOES – 0; ABSENT – 1 (Mayor Aitken). Nomination approved.

20. Establish the Girls in Government event as a city-led initiative to provide girls with an engaging, hands-on opportunity to explore leadership, governance, and civic involvement; and authorize the City Manager, or designees, to take the necessary actions to implement and administer the event.

Council Member Rubalcava reported that the Girls in Government event was a Council priority for her when she was sworn in. She shared that the Community Services Department held a successful event with speakers from City departments who provided insight to the attendees.

Director of Community Services Sjany Larson-Cash reported that following a successful event in 2024, Council Member Rubalcava requested to establish a City-led initiative. She shared that the 2024 Girls in Government Day event provided junior high and high school girls with an opportunity to explore leadership, governance, and civic involvement. She noted that over 60 participants attended panel discussions with women in government, networked, and participated in skill-building workshops. She reported that the event was organized and funded by Council Member Rubalcava’s office with support from the Community Services Department.

DISCUSSION: Council Member Rubalcava noted that the event would be beneficial citywide given the City Council's female majority. She requested to continue including junior high students to receive professional development, financial planning, and career development. She added that the initiative provides workforce development and brings awareness to youth on the career opportunities in the City.

Director Larson-Cash reported that workshops included “Acing the Interview” provided by Disneyland Resort Ambassadors, “Financial Fitness” provided through Orange County Credit Union, and various opportunities throughout the day.

Council Member Rubalcava shared that 80 students attended the event, with over 90 students enrolled. Director Larson-Cash added that no-shows are common for youth events.

MOTION: Council Member Rubalcava moved to establish the Girls in Government event as a city-led initiative to provide girls with an engaging, hands-on opportunity to explore leadership, governance, and civic involvement; and authorize the City Manager, or designees, to take the necessary actions to implement and administer the event.

City Council Minutes of April 22, 2025

DISCUSSION: Council Member Kurtz requested that the Department continue funding the mobile Family Resource Centers and senior programs. She shared that she will support the motion if the program's funding is not affected by the adjustments for the Girls in Government initiative.

MOTION: Council Member Rubalcava moved to establish the Girls in Government event as a city-led initiative to provide girls with an engaging, hands-on opportunity to explore leadership, governance, and civic involvement; and authorize the City Manager, or designees, to take the necessary actions to implement and administer the event, seconded by Council Member Kurtz.

Council Member Rubalcava explained that the event included sponsorships from the Anaheim Police Association, SoCalGas, local business owner Meghan Shigo, Congressman Lou Correa, OCVIBE, and Northgate. Director Larson-Cash shared that the sponsorships covered the costs of the expenses. Council Member Rubalcava reported that her office will continue to support the outreach efforts, in compliance with FPPC guidelines.

Mayor Pro Tem Meeks expressed her support for the item and the fundraising.

Council Member Balius expressed his support for the item.

Council Member Leon expressed his support for the item and thanked Council Member Rubalcava for leading the initiative and providing an opportunity for girls in the community.

Mayor Pro Tem Meeks noted that the City also offers Youth in Government Day.

Council Member Rubalcava highlighted that the committee worked to ensure that the initiative was different from Youth in Government Day. She noted that the committee referenced the City of Tustin’s event to ensure that the event provided a unique experience.

MOTION: Council Member Rubalcava moved to establish the Girls in Government event as a city-led initiative to provide girls with an engaging, hands-on opportunity to explore leadership, governance, and civic involvement; and authorize the City Manager, or designees, to take the necessary actions to implement and administer the event, seconded by Council Member Kurtz. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES – 6 (Mayor Pro Tem Meeks and Council Members Balius, Leon, Rubalcava, Kurtz, and Maahs); NOES – 0; ABSENT – 1 (Mayor Aitken). Motion carried.

21. RESOLUTION NO. 2025-031 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM in support of Assembly Bill 63 “Loitering with Intent to Commit Prostitution.”
Council Member Balius highlighted the proposed resolution which addresses an issue the City is facing in the wake of the implementation of Senate Bill (SB) 357. He reported that SB 357 replaced a law allowing law enforcement officers to approach those loitering with the intent to engage in prostitution. He shared that the legislation‘s goal was to protect people from unjust targeting. He explained that the implementation of SB 357 has had unintended consequences, including increases in prostitution in the City. He added that law enforcement has lost the ability to assist victims of human trafficking. He shared that AB 63 will help restore a tool to allow law enforcement to act and protect vulnerable individuals. He added that AB 63 provides a pathway for earlier intervention, offering services, and provides law enforcement with the ability to abate prostitution and remove associated crime from the community. He expressed his support for the item, noting that residents deserve better.

City Council Minutes of April 22, 2025

MOTION: Council Member Balius moved to approve RESOLUTION NO. 2025-031 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM in support of Assembly Bill 63 “Loitering with Intent to Commit Prostitution.”, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Meeks.

DISCUSSION: Mayor Pro Tem Meeks expressed her support for the resolution to protect women and identify individuals being trafficked.

MOTION: Council Member Balius moved to approve RESOLUTION NO. 2025-031 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM in support of Assembly Bill 63 “Loitering with Intent to Commit Prostitution.”, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Meeks. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES – 6 (Mayor Pro Tem Meeks and Council Members Balius, Leon, Rubalcava, Kurtz, and Maahs); NOES – 0; ABSENT – 1 (Mayor Aitken). Motion carried.

22. ORDINANCE NO. 6608 (INTRODUCTION) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM amending Chapter 6.40 (Fireworks) of the Anaheim Municipal Code to add provisions imposing host liability [includes determination that the ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly)].

Mayor Pro Tem Meeks reported that illegal fireworks are an issue throughout the City and pose a danger to the community and increase the risk of starting fires. She added that the proposed ordinance does not impact the City’s legal, safe, and sane fireworks in designated areas.

Fire Marshal Lindsey Young reported that at the March 25th City Council meeting, Mayor Pro Tem Meeks requested a Host Liability Ordinance to address the illegal possession, sale, and discharge of fireworks. She noted that the proposed ordinance amending Chapter 6.40 of the Anaheim Municipal Code and staff report were available on the City website. She summarized that the ordinance would aid enforcement efforts to allow the City to hold hosts liable if fireworks are illegally possessed, sold, or discharged on the host's premises. She noted that the proposed ordinance would apply to hosts who aid or abet in the illegal possession, sale, or discharge of fireworks on adjacent public rights of way. She shared that the proposed ordinance would encourage increased responsibility among individuals hosting or overseeing events and gatherings and deter illegal firework activity. She added that hosts would be subject to provisions and penalties outlined in Chapter 6.40, including a $1,000 administrative citation for the first offense, $2,000 for the second, and $3,000 for the third offense.

She noted that the proposed ordinance includes a liability exemption for hosts if they promptly seek assistance from the Anaheim Police Department to report firework violations occurring on their property. She reported that staff will initiate a comprehensive public outreach campaign to inform residents, homeowners, renters, and neighborhood leaders; distribute educational materials; and share the information at community events and neighborhood meetings before the Fourth of July.

DISCUSSION: Council Member Kurtz expressed her support for the ordinance and noted it is a step toward addressing the issues.

Council Member Maahs thanked Mayor Pro Tem for requesting the item. She noted that she is receiving calls regarding the Fourth of July and fireworks concerns. She inquired if individuals can be cited for possession of illegal fireworks.

City Council Minutes of April 22, 2025

Fire Marshal Young confirmed individuals can be cited for possession. She added that the proposed ordinance would provide staff with the ability to monitor where the fireworks are coming from and where individuals retreat to.

Council Member Rubalcava expressed her support for the item. She requested additional information on the enforcement of the ordinance with the Anaheim Police Department.

Fire Marshal Young noted that the City has a collaborative task force for the Fourth of July. She shared that the Police Department, Code Enforcement, and Arson Investigators from the Fire Department visit neighborhoods and educate the community. She noted that they distribute education flyers at fireworks booths for safe and sane fireworks.

Council Member Rubalcava inquired if the City is using drones or cameras to identify households.

Fire Marshal Young shared that the City is exploring all avenues to provide comprehensive enforcement efforts.

Council Member Rubalcava suggested a presentation from the Police Department to discuss the enforcement of the proposed ordinance. She expressed her support for the ordinance and recommended solutions for enforcement.

In response to Council Member Balius, Fire Chief Patrick Russell confirmed that the proposed ordinance applies to illegal fireworks. He confirmed that safe and sane fireworks must be lit on private property and not on City streets. He added that the ordinance’s purpose is to address dangerous and illegal fireworks.

MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Meeks moved to introduce ORDINANCE NO. 6608 (INTRODUCTION) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM amending Chapter 6.40 (Fireworks) of the Anaheim Municipal Code to add provisions imposing host liability [includes determination that the ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly)], seconded by Council Member Rubalcava. ROLL CALL VOTE:

AYES – 6 (Mayor Pro Tem Meeks and Council Members Balius, Leon, Rubalcava, Kurtz, and Maahs); NOES – 0; ABSENT – 1 (Mayor Aitken). Motion carried, ordinance introduced.

City Council Minutes of April 22, 2025

PUBLIC HEARING:

23. DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION NO. 2021-00002 (2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT) DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION NO. 2021-00223 (GENERAL PLAN FOCUSED UPDATE) FINAL PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (FPEIR) NO. 356; AND MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM NO. 394
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) SECTION 15061(B)(3) PROJECT LOCATION: Citywide.

REQUEST:
 City-initiated General Plan Amendments to update and adopt the following:
o Adopt the 2021-2029 Housing Element (Sixth Cycle)
o Update General Plan Land Use (including an amendment to Figure LU-4 Land Use Map) and Circulation Elements
o Adopt a new Environmental Justice Element
 Amendments to Title 18 (Zoning) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (Code) modifying:
o Chapter 18.06 (Multiple-Family Residential Zones)
o Chapter 18.10 (Industrial Zone)
o Chapter 18.14 (Public and Special-Purpose Zones)
o Chapter 18.20 (Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone) o Chapter 18.24 (South Anaheim Boulevard Corridor (SABC) Overlay Zone) o Chapter 18.38 (Supplemental Use Regulations)
o Chapter 18.42 (Parking and Loading)
o Chapter 18.70 (Final Plan Reviews)
o Chapter 18.90 (General Provisions)
o Chapter 18.92 (Definitions)
o Chapter 18.120 (Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan No. 2015-1 (SP 2015-1) Zoning and Development Standards)
o Chapter 18.122 (Beach Boulevard Specific Plan No. 2017-1 (SP 2017-1) Zoning and Development Standards)
o Rescinding Chapters 18.30 (Downtown Mixed Use (DMU) Overlay Zone) and

18.32 (Mixed Use (MU) Overlay Zone)
o Adding new Chapters 18.12 (Mixed-Use Zones) and 18.39 (Multiple-Family and Mixed-UseObjective Design Standards)
 Zoning Reclassification amending the Zoning Map to remove the Mixed-Use Overla and Downtown Mixed-Use Overlay
 Corresponding amendment to the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (PTMLUP) to increase the overall amount of residential development in the Platinum Triangle to 24,785 dwelling units, add 2,056 dwelling units of residential development in the Office District; establish the Sunkist-Lewis District with 2,543 dwelling units; increase the amount of residential development in the Katella District to 6,735 dwelling units; and revise maps, figures, text, and tables throughout the document to reflect the proposed increase in residential development in the Platinum Triangle; and  Adjustment No. 16 to the Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan No. 2015-1 and Adjustment No. 11 to the Beach Boulevard Specific Plan No. 2017-1.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City Council will consider whether to certify Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) No. 356, adopt Findings of Fact, a Statement of Overriding Considerations and Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) No. 394, and determine FPEIR No. 356 and MMP No. 394 is the appropriate environmental documentation for the General Plan Amendments to update the General Plan Land Use and Circulation Elements, and adopt a new Environmental Justice Element, and associated actions, under the California Environmental Quality Act. FPEIR No. 356, which includes responses to comments City Council Minutes of April 22, 2025

on the Draft PEIR, is available for public review at Anaheim.net/876/Environmental- Documents. The City Council will also consider whether the proposed General Plan Amendment to adopt the 2021-2029 Housing Element is exempt from the requirements to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15061(b)(3).

ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION:

Recommended that the City Council approve and adopt the proposed General Plan Amendment to adopt the 2021-2029 Housing Element (DEV2021-00002) (Resolution No.

PC2025-005). VOTE: 7-0 (Chairperson Walker and Commissioners Abdulrahman, Castro, Kelly, Lieberman, Perez, and Tran-Martin voted yes) (Planning Commission meeting of March 10, 2025). Recommended that the City Council certify Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) No. 356 and adopt Findings of Fact, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 394 for the General Plan Focused Update and related actions (Resolution No. PC2025-007) and approve and adopt a proposed General Plan Amendment amending the Land Use and Circulation Elements, and adopting the Environmental Justice Element (Resolution No. PC2025-008). VOTE: 6-0 (Vice- Chairperson Tran-Martin and Commissioners Abdulrahman, Castro, Kelly, Lieberman, and Perez voted yes; Chairperson Walker absent) (Planning Commission meeting of March 24, 2025).

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-032 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM certifying Final Program Environmental Impact Report No. 356 and adopting Findings of Fact, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 394 for the General Plan focused update and related actions (DEV2021-00223).

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-033 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM amending the General Plan Housing, Land Use, and Circulation Elements and adopting the Environmental Justice Element (DEV2021-00002 & DEV2021-00223).

ORDINANCE NO. 6609 (INTRODUCTION) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM amending Chapters 18.06 (Multiple-Family Residential Zones), 18.10 (Industrial Zone), 18.14 (Public and Special-Purpose Zones), 18.20 (Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone), 18.24 (South Anaheim Boulevard Corridor (SABC) Overlay Zone), 18.38 (Supplemental Use Regulations), 18.42 (Parking and Loading), 18.70 (Final Plan Reviews), 18.90 (General Provisions), 18.92 (Definitions), 18.120 (Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan No. 2015-1 (SP 2015-1) Zoning and Development Standards), 18.122 (Beach Boulevard Specific Plan No. 2017-1 (SP 2017-1) Zoning and Development Standards), rescinding Chapters 18.30 (Downtown Mixed Use (DMU) Overlay Zone) and 18.32 (Mixed Use (MU) Overlay Zone); adding new Chapters 18.12 (Mixed-Use Zones) and 18.39 (Multiple-Family and Mixed-Use Objective Design Standards) of Title 18 (Zoning) of the Anaheim Municipal Code; Adjustment No. 16 to the Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan No. 2015-1; Adjustment No. 11 to the Beach Boulevard Specific Plan No. 2017-1 [Implementing in part the 2021-2029 Housing Element Rezone Program and Housing Element Policy Program for actions identified for completion by June 2025] (Development Application No. 2021-00223).

ORDINANCE NO. 6610 (INTRODUCTION) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM amending the zoning map referred to in title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code relating to Zoning (DEV2021-00223).

City Council Minutes of April 22, 2025

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-034 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM amending the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan, and making findings in connection therewith (Development Application No. 2021-00223).

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-035 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM adopting the East Anaheim Master Plan of Sanitary Sewers Addendum dated August 2024.

Director of Planning and Building Heather Allen reported that the proposed actions are the remaining steps necessary for Housing Element certification by the State. She shared that Housing Element is a state-required part of the General Plan. She explained that it addresses Anaheim's housing needs over 8 years, 2021-2029. She shared that the Fifth Cycle Housing Element update was adopted in 2014. She reported that the Housing Element update focuses on meeting the City’s housing needs, identifying potential sites, and ensuring compliance with the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) from the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) and the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD).

Director Allen reported that the Housing Element is organized into four chapters and three appendices. She noted that it outlines the City's housing strategy, including an overview of its purpose, an analysis of demographics and special needs populations, and an assessment of housing constraints and resources. She added that it also evaluates fair housing considerations, identifies potential housing sites, and details policies and programs to meet RHNA obligations and housing goals through 2029. She reported that the appendices provide key analyses and insights, including the City’s progress in achieving the goals of the Housing Element, assessing the City’s ability to meet housing obligations while preserving affordable housing, and detailing public engagement efforts, including the role of the Housing Element Update Committee (HEUC) in gathering community input.

Director Allen explained that Chapter 4 of the Housing Element update outlines the necessary actions to address current and future housing needs, ensure compliance with State law, and integrate community feedback. She shared that the primary focus is on expanding affordable housing opportunities for extremely low to moderate-income households. She reported that the Housing Policy Program for the Housing Element is structured around five key strategies to address the City's housing needs. She noted that housing production focuses on creating diverse rental and for-sale housing options, while conservation and preservation aim to maintain existing housing. She added that quality and design policies ensure well-designed, high-quality living spaces, and rehabilitation efforts focus on improving and restoring current housing. She noted that affordable housing opportunities seek to expand housing options for lower-income households.

Director Allen reported that each strategy area incorporates several measures to achieve the City’s housing policy objectives within a defined period. She shared that the new, state-mandated strategies in the Housing Element Update focus on Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH). She explained that AFFH focuses on equal access to housing for all, regardless of race, color, national origin, etc.

She added that the Housing Element Update outlines specific actions to address potential barriers to AFFH through both housing mobility and place-based strategies. She reported that housing mobility refers to the ability of individuals or families to move between housing options, influenced by affordability, economic opportunities, and access to services. She explained that disparities in mobility, often shaped by socio-economic and racial factors, limit access to high-opportunity neighborhoods. She noted that the Housing Element Update aims to expand affordable housing, improve mobility, and address resource needs, particularly in Racially Concentrated Areas of Affluence (RCAAs). She explained that mobility strategies focus on expanding affordable housing through information sharing, workshops, and zoning code streamlining. She added that efforts include City Council Minutes of April 22, 2025

promoting ADU development, implementing a Homelessness Action Plan to reduce homelessness by 70%, and supporting the creation of 100 special needs housing units through funding assistance.

Director Allen reported that place-based strategies aim to revitalize low-opportunity, high-poverty areas by investing in neighborhood improvements, preserving affordable housing, and enhancing infrastructure. She provided examples of efforts, including promoting higher-density housing near public transit, revitalizing disadvantaged neighborhoods, supporting affordable housing services, and rehabilitating substandard housing to improve living conditions.

Director Allen shared that HCD assigns housing units to regions based on the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA), which are then distributed among cities and counties. For the 6th cycle, Anaheim was allocated 17,453 new housing units across all income categories. She reported that the City plans to meet its 2021-2029 RHNA goals by identifying suitable housing sites and implementing supportive policies. She shared that strategies include leveraging projects in progress, ADU development, and identifying candidate sites either with existing residential capacity or properties requiring a General Plan Amendment to add residential capacity. She reported that the candidate sites identified include a surplus over the required units to account for market changes and potential project developments. She noted that the sites are also strategically located near essential resources like transportation, schools, and grocery stores to enhance fair housing opportunities and improve residents' quality of life, and City-owned properties are also considered for housing development. She shared that candidate sites have been identified in all districts based on existing development and available sites that qualified for inclusion.

Director Allen reported that Anaheim’s Housing Element underwent multiple reviews and revisions following its initial submission to HCD in October 2021. She shared that following HCD’s December 2021 comments, the City revised and resubmitted drafts in 2022, 2023, and 2024 to address requests for additional local data, increased justification for candidate sites, and more detailed implementation strategies and timelines for the policy program. She added that on January 30, 2025, HCD confirmed that the revised draft meets State Housing Element Law requirements but will not be in full compliance until the City completes the necessary amendments for the candidate sites.

Director Allen reported that Anaheim’s General Plan was last updated on a comprehensive basis in 2004, with a number of incremental amendments as well as individual element updates since that time. And the Safety Element was recently updated in 2023. She explained that the Focused Update includes the Land Use and Circulation Elements and the addition of an Environmental Justice Element. She shared that with the updates, the City is updating the General Plan to guide growth and development through 2045. She noted that the updates are companion efforts to the Sixth Cycle Housing Element. She added that in addition to the General Plan Amendments, the project includes zoning code and zoning map and Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan amendments, as well as a corresponding environmental analysis and an addendum to the East Anaheim Master Plan of Sanitary Sewers.

Director Allen reported that key objectives of the project are to address housing needs; create additional development opportunities along corridors; create clear community design standards building on existing policy; align with various State requirements; and facilitate future streamline environmental reviews. She noted that the update to the Land Use Element implements both the 2021-2029 housing element and the Center City Corridors Implementation Plan.

Director Allen noted that the City had been assigned facilitation of the production of over 17,000 housing units through 2029. She shared that to meet the need across all income levels, staff have identified 346 candidate sites Citywide. She explained that 195 sites will require a change in General Plan land use designations and 29 neighboring sites while not originally included in the Housing City Council Minutes of April 22, 2025

Element, should receive consistent land use treatment. She reported that the sites were selected based on factors like proximity to transit, potential for redevelopment, and underperforming land uses—all while ensuring compliance with State law and reflecting development trends in the City. She outlined the sites with General Plan Amendments in Districts 3, 4, 5, and 6.

Director Allen reported that after completing the C3 Vision Plan in April 2020, the City focused on creating a regulatory framework to improve conditions and attract economic investment along key corridors, including La Palma Avenue, Lincoln Avenue, Broadway, Ball Road, Harbor Boulevard, and Anaheim Boulevard. She noted that the area is generally bounded by East and West Streets, and the 91 freeway to the north, and extends to the Anaheim Resort and Platinum Triangle to the south.

She added that as part of the C3 Plan, 863 sites were identified for a change in General Plan land use designation. She explained that the changes fall into one of two categories: first, generally for the properties along the corridors, providing additional options for the use and development of these properties, implementing the strategies identified by the C3 project, and second, addressing identified inconsistencies between the General Plan and Zoning, in conflict with State law.

Director Allen shared that as part of the C3 plan, several recommendations were made to create a new regulatory framework, which will apply citywide through the Land Use Element Update. She added that one of the key recommendations was the establishment of new mixed-use land use designations to accommodate various densities and project types, including Mixed-Use Corridor with a density of up to 6.5 dwelling units per acre and a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of up to 0.5, Mixed-Use Low-Medium with up to 18 dwelling units per acre and a FAR of up to 0.35, and Mixed-Use Industrial with up to 30 dwelling units per acre and a FAR of up to 1.0. She reported that the C3 plan recommended setting minimum residential densities of 18 units per acre for Mixed-Use Medium and 30 units per acre for Mixed-Use High designation and proposed changing the implementing zoning for Mixed-Use Urban Core from Downtown Mixed-Use to Mixed-Use Urban Core. She noted that for the project, staff will be updating various tables in the General Plan, including Tables LU-2 and LU-3 for residential and non-residential land use designations. She added that staff will be removing references to the Downtown Mixed-Use Overlay Zone and updating Figure LU-4, the Land Use Plan, as well as Tables LU-5 and LU-6 based on the 2045 buildout analysis.

Director Allen reported that the C3 plan recommended separating institutional land use designations into Institutional-High and Institutional-Low. She added that new implementing zoning is proposed for the Corridor Residential land use designation to provide more options for multi-family development on properties with a density of up to 13 dwelling units per acre. She noted that a minor update is proposed to the section of the General Plan that describes the Intermodal Transportation Center to reflect ARTIC’s role as a major transportation hub in Orange County and Southern California. She added that the Land Use Element amendments implement Housing Production Strategies 1H and 1R from the Sixth Cycle Housing Element.

Principal Transportation Planner Joseph Alcock reported that updates to the Circulation Element focused on four components. He shared that staff updated the City’s traffic analysis to understand the impacts of the proposed land use and policy changes on the future transportation system, updated the Circulation Element’s Goals and Policies, developed proposed transportation network modifications, and documented the technical findings. He outlined the Circulation Element’s Goals, including supporting active transportation, supporting public transit and ridesharing, supporting efforts to enhance transportation safety, developing a fiscally sound transportation system, and adhering to state Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emission reduction requirements.

Principal Transportation Planner Alcock outlined the proposed roadway network changes. He explained that a planned piece of Weir Canyon Road no longer required by development will be removed and three roadway classifications, Disneyland Drive, Lemon Street, and Raymond Street will City Council Minutes of April 22, 2025

be updated to be consistent with OCTA’s Master Plan of Arterial Highways to ensure that the City remains eligible to receive Measure M2 funds.

Principal Transportation Planner Alcock reported that staff are proposing two changes for the Planned Bike Network. He shared that a Class III bike lane will be added on Stanley Cup Way to support the OCVIBE development and a Class II bike facility will be added on Lincoln Avenue to support recent zoning changes along Lincoln Avenue.

Principal Transportation Planner Alcock outlined the technical findings on the proposed changes. He highlighted that of the 154 roadway segments and 254 intersections analyzed, the proposed changes improved system performance. He shared that five intersections did not meet the City’s level of service policy of D or better. He noted that with the proposed update, one intersection (Imperial Highway/La Palma Avenue) had a performance finding. He explained that it was a result of a proposed buildout capacity assumption in the model rather than a performance issue. He added that staff developed a Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) forecast and found that a CEQA impact was not triggered.

Director Allen reported that Senate Bill 1000, The Planning for Healthy Communities Act of 2016 required local governments with Environmental Justice (EJ) Communities to include EJ policies within their General Plans when revising at least two Elements after Jan. 1, 2018. Environmental Justice ensures fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people, regardless of background, in environmental decision-making. She noted that it seeks to prevent any group from facing a disproportionate share of negative environmental impacts from industrial, governmental, or commercial activities. She reported that according to the California Environmental Protection Agency’s mapping tool, CalEnviroScreen, 51 of Anaheim’s 78 census tracts are considered EJ Communities, which face higher pollution exposure and socioeconomic challenges than other areas.

She noted that adoption of the EJ Element implements Affordable Housing Opportunity Strategy 5E:

Affirmatively Further Fair Housing, addressing Place-Based Strategies for EJ Discrepancy. She explained that the EJ Element expands on these efforts by integrating community feedback and environmental data to establish new goals. She noted that the EJ Element identifies goals and policies in eight key areas, ranging from reducing pollution, to ensuring safe and sanitary homes. She explained that the EJ Element addresses the connection between housing conditions, affordability, and public health throughout the city, with an emphasis on EJ communities. She reported that at the August 1, 2022 Planning Commission workshop and discussed sample policies including: reducing pollution exposure & improving air quality, promoting public facilities, enhancing food access, ensuring safe & sanitary housing, encouraging physical activity, addressing health risks & disparities, increasing civic engagement in decision-making, and prioritizing programs for disadvantaged communities.

Director Allen outlined Zoning Code Amendments to add Chapter 18.12 (Mixed-Use Zones) to define allowable land uses and property development standards for the mixed-use zone and include objective design standards in Chapter 18.39 to ensure the quality and certainty for future development. She explained that Chapter 18.12 will be added to the zoning code to establish land use and development standards for all existing and new mixed-use zones. She explained that the development standards were designed to address the unique characteristics and development needs of the seven mixed-use zones and the surrounding environment, promoting market-driven land use changes, infill development, and ease of implementation. She added that the chapter introduces two distinct review processes for various development types within mixed-use zones. Stand-alone residential and non-residential projects that comply with zoning requirements may submit construction drawings directly to the Building Division for approval. She noted that mixed-use projects require a Final Site Plan application with a decision from the Planning and Building Director, who also has the City Council Minutes of April 22, 2025

option to refer the decision to the Planning Commission. She added that the amendment implements Housing Production Strategy 1T: Consideration of New Zoning Tools.

Director Allen reported that in response to Senate Bill 330, which prohibits denying housing projects based on subjective design standards, Chapter 18.39 was drafted to establish Objective Design Standards (ODS) for multi-family and mixed-use developments. She noted that Chapter 18.39 ensures high-quality design, aligns with the Community Design Element, and streamlines the approval process. She added that the objective design standards address design topics such as site planning, mass and scale, materials and details, frontage types, and historic adjacencies. She shared that the objective design standards are written in clear, objective terms, consistent with recent State housing laws and include addressing adjacency to single-family residential zones and historic resources or districts. She added that a Frontage Type Design Manual was introduced as an administrative supplement to the ODS, detailing how buildings interact with sidewalks to enhance the pedestrian environment and maintain desired building form and quality. She explained that the amendment implements (Housing Production Strategy 1P: Review of Entitlement Processes, Development Standards, and Development Fees as it relates to the removal of subjective language from findings of approval and Housing Quality and Design Strategy 3: Community Design.

Director Allen reported that California Assembly Bill (AB) 2097, signed into law in 2022, prohibits cities and counties from imposing minimum parking requirements on most new developments located near public transit. She explained that local governments cannot mandate a specific number of parking spaces for residential, commercial, or mixed-use projects within half a mile of a major transit stop. She noted that by eliminating parking minimums, the law aims to reduce development costs and encourage housing construction in transit-accessible areas, supporting efforts to increase housing availability and promote sustainable urban growth. She added that proposed amendments to various Zoning Code chapters would implement AB 2097 by incorporating references to the relevant California Government Code provisions. She shared that recent state laws are changing the definition of transit stop and staff continues to work with applicants on applicability – generally, these locations are based at the intersection of qualifying bus routes as well as identified transit facilities like ARTIC.

Director Allen outlined additional amendments including permit dwellings with residential or mixed- use General Plan designations, residential on sites from prior Housing Element by-right, implementing new Institutional designations, and standard conditions of approval. She added that the Mixed-Use and Downtown Mixed-Use Overlay Zones will be rescinded with the establishment of Mixed-Use Zones. She noted that development standards unique to the Downtown Mixed-Use Overlay Zone have been incorporated into the Mixed-Use Zones Chapter.

Director Allen reported that the proposed amendments to the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan will reflect the changes in the General Plan by creating new residential and mixed-use opportunities in areas previously not identified for housing. She noted that it will increase the total number of residential units in the Platinum Triangle by 6,309 units. She reported that the amendments can be broken down into three groups. She noted that the first amendment is the introduction of the Mixed-Use Medium land use designation to the periphery of the Platinum Triangle.

She shared that the Platinum Triangle is comprised of ten development areas, each with a specific allocation of development intensity. She reported that the second amendment to the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan allocates the additional residential units into three districts: The Katella District, the Office District, and the newly established Sunkist-Lewis District. She concluded that the third amendment to the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan consisted of comprehensive updates to Master Land Use Plan to reflect the proposed increase in residential development within the Platinum Triangle.

City Council Minutes of April 22, 2025

Director Allen reported that the current Combined East Anaheim Master Plan of Sanitary Sewers (EAMPSS) was completed and adopted in May 2023, based on the 2020 Census data, with an addendum dated August 2024 incorporating the General Plan Focused Update Project. She shared that the addendum will provide a foundation for prioritizing future capital improvements and help guide opportunities and needs for future General Plan amendments, Specific Plans, and land use changes that would modify wastewater flows in our sanitary sewer system. She added that the General Plan Focused Update Project will also affect the Central Anaheim Area and will be incorporated into the new Central Master Plan currently being updated, as approved by City Council on November 7, 2023.

Director Allen reported that a Program EIR is a type of EIR that is used to evaluate a project such as a General Plan Update or a specific plan, which includes a series of actions that may be considered as one large project, and are related either geographically or as logical parts in the chain of contemplated actions. She noted that use of a Program EIR provides the opportunity to consider broad policy alternatives and program-wide mitigation measures, along with greater flexibility to address project-specific and cumulative environmental issues on a comprehensive basis. She shared that the program-level environmental review for the General Plan update and C3-specific plan began with the notices of preparation and scoping meetings in February and March of 2022. She explained that the purpose of the Notices of Preparation and Scoping meetings was to request input from agencies, residents, and interested parties on the scope and content of the environmental information that should be included in the PEIR. She noted that the Draft PEIR was made available for public review on December 20 for a 45-day period. She shared that the City received and responded to comment letters from three agencies, one organization, and two verbal comments at the Planning Commission workshop, which have been included in the Final PEIR.

Director Allen explained that an EIR can include up to 20 topics. Of the 20 topics, the Program EIR concluded that the project would have no effects related to Agricultural and Forestry Resources, and Mineral Resources. She shared that the analysis of the 18 additional topics evaluated the level of impact as less than significant, less than significant with mitigation, or significant and unavoidable.

She reported that although the criteria for determining significance are different for each topic area, the environmental analysis applies a uniform classification of the impacts based on definitions consistent with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines. She noted that of the 18 topics analyzed, 11 were found to be less than significant with geology/soils only requiring mitigation related to paleontological resources, and three additional topic areas were found to be less than significant with mitigation – these are biological, cultural, and tribal cultural resources. She shared that the City has been implementing many conditions that relate to topics addressed by CEQA. She noted that compliance with these standard conditions would further reduce negative impacts for future development. She explained that the City will be adopting these and other Master Standard Conditions of Approval that are applied to all development projects through the plan-check review process, as applicable, as a component of project actions.

Director Allen reported that the Draft PEIR includes Standard Conditions of Approval (SCAs) to streamline future CEQA reviews. She noted that the conditions ensure that environmental impacts are properly addressed or that a project justifies why specific conditions don’t apply. She shared that Appendix G of the Draft PEIR provides a comprehensive list of SCAs, which are integrated into the relevant analysis chapters and have been codified in the Zoning Code under Chapter 18.90.

Director Allen reported that the three topics that would result in significant and unavoidable impacts were air quality (construction and operation), greenhouse gas emissions, and noise (construction and operation). She noted that the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations, the substantial benefits resulting from the implementation of the Housing Element and General Plan Focused Update outweigh these potential adverse effects.

City Council Minutes of April 22, 2025

Director Allen reported that throughout the Housing Element and General Plan Update process, the City has prioritized community engagement to ensure meaningful public input. She shared that for the Housing Element, staff conducted extensive public outreach beginning in early 2021 through community workshops, Housing Element Update Committee meetings, and an online survey to gather input on housing policies. She noted that outreach efforts included bilingual advertising and events to ensure broad participation. Key activities featured three community workshops, five technical focus group interviews, and multiple commission and council workshops. She highlighted the City’s dedicated website, which provided resources and the draft Housing Element available for public review. She reported that for the C3 Plan, staff conducted in-person outreach at district meetings, community events, and open houses, as well as virtual stakeholder meetings and an interactive StoryMap website where residents could provide feedback. She noted that tor the Environmental Justice Element, staff maintained a dedicated project website with ongoing updates and opportunities for input. She highlighted that outreach efforts included bilingual flyers, social media promotions, virtual workshops, and a focus group with community leaders to address key environmental justice concerns. She reported that the Land Use Element involved extensive public engagement, particularly in selecting housing sites for the Sixth Cycle Housing Element Update, including community workshops, technical focus groups, surveys, and multiple meetings with the Planning Commission, Housing and Community Development Commission, and City Council. She shared that a public workshop, community meetings, a survey, and engagement of a Technical Advisory Committee were hosted for the Circulation Element. She noted that the Circulation Element’s goals were revised to improve clarity and adapt to evolving transportation funding challenges. She added that ahead of the Planning Commission public hearing, staff mailed notices to over 1,000 property owners affected by land use designation changes, providing details on modifications while clarifying zoning and development standards. She shared that staff engaged directly with property owners, responding to questions and addressing concerns. She noted that staff worked to ensure that the community had multiple opportunities to participate, shaping a General Plan that reflects the needs and priorities of Anaheim’s residents.

Director Allen reported that the Planning Commission found that the proposed 2021-2029 Housing Element Update and General Plan Focused Update, including the new Environmental Justice Element, amendments to the Zoning Code, and updates to the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan, comply with applicable State laws and policies. She noted that the update will implement the goals and policies of the Draft Sixth Cycle Housing Element, aligning with the City’s efforts to accommodate growth, promote sustainable development, address environmental justice issues, and enhance economic and housing opportunities. She reported that to ensure compliance with State law requirements and meet the mandated eight-year Housing Element update cycle, the Planning Commission and staff recommended that the City Council approve and adopt the 2021-2029 Housing Element Update (DEV2021-00002) and General Plan Focused Update (DEV2021-00223), including certification of FPEIR No. 356, Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations, and MMP No. 394, and approval of related Zoning Code, Map, and PTMLUP amendments.

DISCUSSION: Council Member Rubalcava expressed concern over residents’ addresses being updated from the current General Plan land use designation of residential, low-medium density to mixed-use medium.

Director Allen explained that the C3 project identified properties within the project boundaries with inconsistencies between the zoning and the current General Plan. She added that in 2018, the State required Charter cities to address inconsistencies between zoning and the General Plan. She added that the State requires that the City not downzone properties. She clarified that staff do not intend for a new development to occur.

City Council Minutes of April 22, 2025

Council Member Rubalcava shared that the concerns stem from residential single-family homes being rezoned. She noted parking challenges in District 3 and the potential for developers to construct mixed-use medium projects. She noted that the rezoning would not affect the approval of the Housing Element.

In response to Council Member Maahs, Director Allen explained that a major transit stop is the radius around an intersection of qualifying transit routes. She added that a State law amendment was approved in January that decreased or increased headway from 15 minutes to 20 minutes.

Council Member Maahs inquired if there are no minimum parking requirements in the area. Director Allen confirmed that State law confirms that the City cannot enforce in the area. She added that if there are impacts to existing residential and commercial uses, the project is not exempt from a challenge.

Prior to opening public comments, Mayor Pro Tem Meeks announced that a video had been submitted to the City Clerk to be broadcast during public comment. She noted that the video was reviewed, and there was no conclusion that the video was relevant to the proceedings. She explained that while it may be relevant to other items within the City’s jurisdiction, it would not necessarily pertain to the public hearing. She shared that the video is longer than the allotted five minutes for public comments for legislative hearings. She reported that the City will allow the video to be played during public comments under the purview of the City’s rules. She shared that speakers wishing to play a portion of the video during their comments may do so during their allotted speaking time. She noted that the public hearing is a legislative item that allows more discretion on what can be considered or deemed immaterial by Council Members. She announced that in the interest of the Brown Act to allow for public participation under Government Code 54954.3, the video will be allowed to be played.

At 9:23 p.m., Mayor Pro Tem Meeks opened the public hearing.

Max Uyekawa, representing his mother Alice, shared that his family operates a trucking business in District 6. He shared that they have received letters notifying them that their property will be affected by the project. He inquired if the City is requiring them to sell their property and move. He shared their experience with eminent domain in the cities of Los Angeles and Huntington Park. He requested any guidance from the City to address any potential conflicts.

In response to Mr. Uyekawa, Director Allen clarified that the action provides options to the property owner and does not change the site's zoning. She confirmed Mr. Uyekawa and his family can continue to operate and expand, and will not be non-conforming. She added that the action provides additional options for property owners and will not require them to sell, relocate, or leave their properties.

Graciela Arzola expressed concern that the City only received feedback from 20 property owners out of 1,000. She recommended that the City improve efforts to notify and engage with property owners.

Council Member Rubalcava confirmed the resident's property is in District 3.

Ms. Arzola requested clarification on rezoning on Anaheim Boulevard and building additional units.

She shared that property owners cannot afford to develop like investors. She expressed concern over investors buying out residents and tenants.

Director Allen explained that there are properties with proposed changes in the General Plan.

She explained that the properties are currently low-medium with a proposed change to mixed- City Council Minutes of April 22, 2025

use medium. She clarified that the residential density will remain the same, but will include an option for either stand-alone residential, stand-alone commercial, or a mix of the two Marc Herbert shared that the following four (4) speakers will be presenting a video. He commented on public engagement during the Housing Element process. He shared that there are unanswered questions over the Housing Element Update Committee. He shared his experience with providing public comments at various City boards and commissions.

City Clerk Theresa Bass explained that Mr. Herbert’s remaining time will be used to present the video submitted and will be paused and continued for each speaker during the speaking time.

The video presented during public comments covered the Angels Stadium lease with the City and audit of the stadium.

Vern Nelson deferred his speaking time to continue the video.

Mike Robbins deferred his speaking time to continue the video.

Stephanie Mercadante deferred her speaking time to continue the video.

Jeanine Robbins shared that the lack of low and very-low-income housing is the most pressing issue for the City. She commented that the lack of affordable housing has led to increases in homelessness, lack of parking, and poverty in the City. She criticized the current Council and previous Councils for not addressing the issues. She suggested resuming public engagement during the Housing Element process, a minimum of 25% of affordable housing required in all developments on the Angels Stadium site and increased affordable housing in the City, and an entertainment tax at the City’s tourist attractions. She encouraged the City Council to address the housing crisis.

Bryan Kaye reported that the City does not have guidelines for affordable housing. He criticized the City Council for not embracing public engagement. He shared that Council Members have not responded to his comments or inquiries. He requested that the City Council listen and engage with the public.

City Clerk Theresa Bass reported that no electronic public comments were received related to Public Hearing Item No. 23.

At 10:05 p.m., Mayor Pro Tem Meeks closed the public hearing.

Council Member Rubalcava requested to remove Raleigh Street from the General Plan Amendments.

Director Allen clarified that the area removed would be the 1200 block of North Raleigh Street.

In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Director Allen clarified that the properties south of La Palma were zoned for low-medium residential with a proposed change to mixed-use low-medium, with the same density and allowing for residential, commercial, or both.

In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Director Allen explained that the properties can continue as commercial properties, expand, or implement the current General Plan designation as low-medium residential zoning. She added that the amendment would correct the inconsistency for the properties to mixed-use low-medium.

City Council Minutes of April 22, 2025

Council Member Rubalcava inquired if the amendment would have a negative impact on the residents. Director Allen explained that the current zoning will remain and would not remove any current designations to the sites. She clarified that the General Plan will be updated to be consistent with the commercial zoning and continue to allow residential at the same density.

Council Member Rubalcava requested that staff work with her office to address additional concerns from residents. She encouraged residents to contact State representatives to discuss issues negatively impacting the community, including parking.

In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Director Allen reported that many properties located in the Anaheim Colony are inconsistent at a higher density than the zoning outlined in the General Plan.

She clarified that the action will amend the General Plan to be consistent with the zoning. She added that historical requirements for Mills Act properties or the National Register would be considered first for development proposals submitted. She noted that the adjacency standards to historic properties are included in the proposed design standards.

Council Member Rubalcava requested additional information on the updates affecting St. Michael’s property. She shared that she has received concerns from residents about the project’s density. She expressed concern about the impacts on the quality of life and character of the neighborhood.

Director Allen reported that the property is located at 311 W. South Street and zoned at RM-3, an existing multi-family zone with a General Plan of low-density residential. She explained that the City is unable to zone it under State law requirements. She noted that the proposed amendment is to increase the General Plan to low-medium density, for up to 18 dwelling units per acre. She confirmed that the church was zoned for residential use.

In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Director Allen explained that if the City did not address the issue, there would continue to be inconsistencies. She reported that beginning in 2018, State law required cities to make progress to address inconsistencies. She added that the applicant can request their own General Plan Amendment. She reported that the General Plan has implementing zoning. She explained that the General Plan at the policy level provides maximum densities and intensities of development and the Zoning Code provides all the regulations. She explained that inconsistencies exist when there are different uses according to the General Plan compared to the zoning. She noted that the City has addressed inconsistencies through recent code updates, with the proposed action addressing additional inconsistencies.

Council Member Rubalcava inquired how the City can enhance public engagement. She requested updates to public notices to ensure the public understands the projects and to send notices via email or text message.

Director Allen shared that there are new objective design standards for adjacency to single-family residences. She reported that the notices mailed to property owners exceeded the standard noticing requirements and deviated from the standard notice format to ensure public understanding and clarification. She noted that the notice explained that the project would not remove existing entitlements and provided the project planner’s information. She added that utilizing technology to inform the public is a Strategic Plan component that staff can continue to evaluate.

Council Member Kurtz requested that copies of the public hearing notices be sent to Council Members. She inquired if 100 Midway was removed. Director Allen confirmed that, at Council’s request, 100 Midway can be removed from consideration.

City Council Minutes of April 22, 2025

Council Member Kurtz requested to remove the property from consideration. She pointed out the potential for additional housing on Anaheim Boulevard. She expressed concern over current traffic issues on Midway Drive and the addition of mixed-use developments. She expressed her support for the item with the removal of the Midway site.

In response to Council Member Leon, Director Allen explained that candidate sites are a mixture of sites that have existing residential capacity and sites where a General Plan Amendment was identified. She noted that there were a number of criteria to identify sites and to identify the level of development in the area. She shared that 108 units were identified in District 2 for contribution. She added that each District was analyzed with limited vacant and underutilized sites in District 2. She confirmed that the zoning will remain consistent in District 2 with no major changes.

Mayor Pro Tem Meeks requested to remove sites in the Anaheim Canyon area in District 6 due to the lack of parks, schools, and grocery stores.

Director Allen clarified that the area is located on the south side of La Palma between Kraemer and Miller. Mayor Pro Tem noted that the area would not include properties on Imperial adjacent to residential properties and services in the cities of Placentia and Yorba Linda. She expressed her support for the item. She expressed her concern over the State’s requirements which could have negative effects on neighborhoods.

Council Member Maahs inquired if costs for infrastructure are shared among developers and builders or passed to Anaheim residents.

Director Allen explained that the amendment to the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan evaluated the sites and impacts of the project on water, sewer, and traffic in the EIR. She noted that there are Community Facilities Districts (CFDs) in portions of the Platinum Triangle which contribute to infrastructure. She added that the City has impact fees for projects including park fees, traffic fees, and traffic impact fees. She noted that the City is separately working to update the impact fees. She added that if the updates move forward, the properties would pay the current rate of the fee or the CFD.

Council Member Maahs expressed her support for the item.

Council Member Balius commended staff for their work on the item to identify suitable properties to help meet the City’s RHNA allocations. He expressed his support for new construction in the City but expressed concern over the State’s requirements for cities. He inquired if there were funding revenues the State could provide to help build affordable housing units.

Director Allen reported that following the dissolution of the Redevelopment Agency, the State removed the City’s dedicated annual funding stream for affordable housing. She shared that there are grant funds and different funds the City can obtain; however, an income stream has not replaced the Redevelopment funds.

In response to Council Member Leon, Director Allen reported that the City Council has taken important steps that were not in place for the Fifth Cycle. She highlighted the adoption of the inclusionary housing ordinance, the Affordable Housing Trust Fund, and community benefits negotiated from projects. She shared that affordable housing in the low and very-low categories is generated by an affordable housing developer and market-rate housing through a market-rate developer. She noted that programs requiring affordable housing or mechanisms to obtain gap funding are ways to advance affordable housing production. She highlighted projects from the Housing and Community Development Department who work with developers to construct units.

City Council Minutes of April 22, 2025

Council Member Rubalcava added that to continue to receive funding for the Housing Authority or funding to develop affordable and transitional housing, the City Council would need to approve the proposed amendments.

Director Allen confirmed that staff have worked with the California Department of Housing and Community Development to retain Housing Assistance Program funds and other unrestricted funds.

Council Member Rubalcava added that the funds are similar to ones used for the Tampico restoration.

MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Meeks moved to approve RESOLUTION NO. 2025-032 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM certifying Final Program Environmental Impact Report No. 356 and adopting Findings of Fact, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 394 for the General Plan focused update and related actions (DEV2021-00223), RESOLUTION NO. 2025-033 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM amending the General Plan Housing, Land Use, and Circulation Elements and adopting the Environmental Justice Element (DEV2021-00002 & DEV2021- 00223), as amended to remove the 1200 block of North Raleigh Street, 100 West Midway Drive, and the properties on La Palma Avenue between Kramer Boulevard and Miller Street, ORDINANCE NO. 6609 (INTRODUCTION) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM amending Chapters 18.06 (Multiple-Family Residential Zones), 18.10 (Industrial Zone),

18.14 (Public and Special-Purpose Zones), 18.20 (Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone), 18.24 (South Anaheim Boulevard Corridor (SABC) Overlay Zone), 18.38 (Supplemental Use Regulations), 18.42 (Parking and Loading), 18.70 (Final Plan Reviews), 18.90 (General Provisions),

18.92 (Definitions), 18.120 (Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan No. 2015-1 (SP 2015-1) Zoning and Development Standards), 18.122 (Beach Boulevard Specific Plan No. 2017-1 (SP 2017-1) Zoning and Development Standards), rescinding Chapters 18.30 (Downtown Mixed Use (DMU) Overlay Zone) and 18.32 (Mixed Use (MU) Overlay Zone); adding new Chapters 18.12 (Mixed-Use Zones) and 18.39 (Multiple-Family and Mixed-Use Objective Design Standards) of Title 18 (Zoning) of the Anaheim Municipal Code; Adjustment No. 16 to the Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan No. 2015-1; Adjustment No. 11 to the Beach Boulevard Specific Plan No. 2017-1 [Implementing in part the 2021- 2029 Housing Element Rezone Program and Housing Element Policy Program for actions identified for completion by June 2025] (Development Application No. 2021-00223), ORDINANCE NO. 6610 (INTRODUCTION) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM amending the zoning map referred to in Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code relating to Zoning (DEV2021-00223), RESOLUTION NO. 2025-034 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM amending the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan, and making findings in connection therewith (Development Application No. 2021-00223), and RESOLUTION NO. 2025-035 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM adopting the East Anaheim Master Plan of Sanitary Sewers Addendum dated August 2024, seconded by Council Member Kurtz. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES – 6 (Mayor Pro Tem Meeks and Council Members Balius, Leon, Rubalcava, Kurtz, and Maahs); NOES – 0; ABSENT – 1 (Mayor Aitken). Motion carried, ordinances introduced.

REPORT ON CLOSED SESSION ACTIONS: None
PUBLIC COMMENTS (non-agenda items): None
COUNCIL AGENDA SETTING:

Council Member Kurtz requested a memo outlining the steps and timelines necessary to bring a discussion to Council regarding ATID contributions for housing.

City Council Minutes of April 22, 2025

City Manager Vanderpool responded that staff will prepare a memo outlining the necessary steps to bring the item to Council for approval, including estimated and required timelines, and estimated timelines to prepare the necessary documents.

Mayor Pro Tem Meeks requested to agendize a recognition for Norio “Nori” Uyematsu, a 94-year-old Korean War Veteran, for his work in promoting and recognizing Korean War Veterans.

ADJOURNMENT: With no further business before the City Council, Mayor Pro Tem Meeks adjourned the City Council meeting at 10:37 p.m.

Respectfully submitted,
Theresa Bass, CMC
City Clerk