FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
ANAHEIM HILLS FESTIVAL SPECIFIC PLAN
AMENDMENT PROJECT
(STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 2024010859)
Prepared for City of Anaheim
200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, Suite 162
Anaheim, California 92805
Contact: Amanda Lauffer
Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
1100 W. Town & Country Road, Suite 700
Orange, California 92868
Contact: Kiana Daniels, AICP
SEPTEMBER 2025
Anaheim Hills Festival Specific Plan Amendment Project
Final Environmental Impact Report Table of Contents
City of Anaheim i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Public Review Draft Environmental Impact Report................................................................1
1.2 Final Environmental Impact Report.......................................................................................1
2.0 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ................................................................................................... 3
2.1 List of Written Commenters..................................................................................................3
2.2 List of Commenters at the Planning Commission Workshop..................................................4
2.3 Responses to Written Comments..........................................................................................5
2.3.1 Comment Letters and Responses: Agencies (A).....................................................................5
2.3.2 Comment Letters and Responses: Organizations (B) ........................................................... 14
2.3.3 Comment Letters and Responses: Individuals (C)................................................................ 22
2.4 Responses to Planning Commission Workshop Comments.................................................. 26
3.0 CLARIFICATIONS AND REVISIONS ........................................................................................ 29 Appendices
Appendix A: Written Comments on the Draft EIR
Appendix B: Verbal Comments from Individuals at Planning Commission Workshop Appendix C: Mitigation Monitoring Program
Appendix D: Traffic Impact Analysis
Appendix E: Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis
Appendix F: Localized Emissions and Health Risk Assessment Anaheim Hills Festival Specific Plan Amendment Project Section 1.0 Final Environmental Impact Report Introduction
City of Anaheim 1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Public Review Draft Environmental Impact Report
In accordance with State California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines §§15120 through 15132, the City of Anaheim (“City”) prepared a Draft Environmental Impact Report (Draft EIR) for the Anaheim Hills Festival Specific Plan Amendment Project (Project) (State Clearinghouse Number 2024010859). The Draft EIR was made available for review and comment to the public, responsible and trustee agencies, interested groups, and organizations for a 45-day review period that occurred between June 20, 2025, and August 4, 2025. The Draft EIR was also made available directly to State agencies through the State Clearinghouse, Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation.
1.2 Final Environmental Impact Report
As previously noted, the Draft EIR for this Project was made available for review and comment for a 45- day public review period. The City evaluated all written comments received during the Draft EIR public review period concerning significant environmental issues pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines §15088.
Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines §15088.5(f)(2), the City prepared written responses to comments received during the Draft EIR circulation period that relate to the Draft EIR. Additionally, pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines §15088(b), at least 10 days prior to certifying the EIR, the City will provide a written response to each public agency on comments made by that public agency.
State CEQA Guidelines §15132 state that a Final EIR shall consist of:
• The Draft EIR or a revision of the draft;
• Comments and recommendations received on the Draft EIR either verbatim or in summary; • A list of persons, organizations, and public agencies commenting on the DEIR; • The Lead Agency’s responses to significant environmental points raised in the review and consultation process; and
• Any other information added by the Lead Agency.
As such, this Final EIR consists of the following components:
• Section 1.0: Introduction
• Section 2.0: Response to Comments
o Section 2.1: List of Written Commenters
o Section 2.2: List of Commenters at the Planning Commission Workshop o Section 2.3: Responses to Written Comments
o Section 2.4: Responses to Planning Commission Workshop Comments • Section 3.0: Corrections and Revisions
• Appendix A: Written Comments on the Draft EIR
• Appendix B: Verbal Comments from Individuals at Planning Commission Workshop • Appendix C: Mitigation Monitoring Program
• Appendix D: Traffic Impact Analysis
• Appendix E: Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis
• Appendix F: Localized Emissions and Health Risk Assessment Anaheim Hills Festival Specific Plan Amendment Project Section 1.0 Final Environmental Impact Report Introduction
City of Anaheim 2
This Final EIR will allow the public and Lead Agency an opportunity to review the Draft EIR revisions, the comments and responses, and other EIR components, such as the MMP before Project consideration. This Final EIR will serve as the environmental document to support a decision on the Project.
It is noted, none of the corrections/clarifications identified in this Final EIR constitute “significant new information” pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines §15088.5. The corrections/clarifications identified in this Final EIR merely clarify/amplify and make insignificant modifications to the Draft EIR. The corrections/clarifications do not involve changes in the Project or environmental setting, or significant new information.
Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines §15090, prior to approving a project, the Lead Agency must certify that:
• This Final EIR has been completed in compliance with CEQA; • This Final EIR was presented to the decision-making body of the Lead Agency, and that the decision-making body reviewed and considered the information in this Final EIR prior to approving the Project; and
• This Final EIR reflects the Lead Agency’s independent judgment and analysis.
This certification, of “Findings of Fact,” are included in a separate Findings document. Both this Final EIR and the Findings will be submitted to the Lead Agency for consideration of the Project.
Anaheim Hills Festival Specific Plan Amendment Project Section 2.0 Final Environmental Impact Report Response to Comments
City of Anaheim 3
2.0 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
All of the written comment letters and email comments received by the City during the public review period, as well as the oral comments that were provided at the July 14, 2025, Planning Commission Workshop, have been included and responded to in this Final EIR, with particular focus on comments that raise questions regarding the Project’s environmental analyses. While comments that (1) do not address the adequacy or completeness of the Draft EIR; (2) do not raise substantive environmental issues pursuant to CEQA; (3) do not address the Project; or (4) request the incorporation of additional information not relevant to environmental issues do not require a response, this Final EIR has responded to all comments received during the public review period.
2.1 List of Written Commenters
In accordance with the State CEQA Guidelines § 15132, the following is a list of public agencies, organizations, and individuals that submitted comments on the Draft EIR received as of the close of the public review period on August 4, 2025. Comments have been numbered, and responses have been developed with corresponding numbers. Written comments are provided as Appendix A of this Final EIR.
Table 2-1: Comment Letters
Letter Reference Commenter
Date of
Correspondence
Page
No.
Agencies (A)
A1 South Coast Air Quality Management District July 1, 2025 1 A2 South Coast Air Quality Management District August 1, 2025 3 A3 California Department of Transportation, District 12 August 4, 2025 7 Organizations (B)
B1 Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility (SAFER) June 30, 2025 12
B2 Western States Regional Council of Carpenters (WSRCC) August 4, 2025 14 Individuals(C)
C1 Rich Fagner June 20, 2025 300
C2 Shelley Shuff June 28, 2025 301
C3 Joy Pickett July 3, 2025 303
C4 Grace McGee July 14, 2025 304
C5 Marcia Anderson July 29, 2025 305
C6 Allison Valdivia July 30, 2025 306
C7 Betty and Dana Farnsworth July 30, 2025 307
C8 Evalina Loyo July 30, 2025 308
C9 Joy Pickett August 1, 2025 310
Anaheim Hills Festival Specific Plan Amendment Project Section 2.0 Final Environmental Impact Report Response to Comments
City of Anaheim 4
2.2 List of Commenters at the Planning Commission Workshop The following is a list of individuals who commented at the Planning Commission Workshop, provided below in Table 2-2. Verbal comments from this workshop are provided within Appendix B of this Final EIR.
Table 2-2: Commenters at the Planning Commission Workshop Comment Identifier Commenter Name
D1 John Mozzarella
D2 Jimmy Arrivallo (Western States Regional Council of Carpenters) D3 Betty Farnsworth
D4 Mark Herbert
D5 Mr. Hill
Anaheim Hills Festival Specific Plan Amendment Project Section 2.0 Final Environmental Impact Report Response to Comments
City of Anaheim 5
2.3 Responses to Written Comments
This section presents responses to written comments received from agencies, organizations, and individuals during the public review period for the Draft EIR for the Project. Each comment letter is assigned a unique letter designation (e.g., A1, B1, C1), and individual comments within each letter are bracketed and numbered sequentially (e.g., A1-1, A1-2, etc.) for reference purposes.
Copies of the full comment letters, with bracketed comment numbers, are provided in Appendix A of this Response to Comments. The responses to individual comments are provided below and are organized to correspond to the bracketed comments in Appendix A.
Where portions of the Draft EIR are excerpted in this section for reference or clarification, the text is shown indented. Where changes to the Draft EIR have been made in response to comments or to clarify the analysis, additions are shown in underlined text and deletions are shown in strikeout text, unless otherwise noted.
2.3.1 COMMENT LETTERS AND RESPONSES: AGENCIES (A)
Comment Letter A1 – South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD), July 1, 2025 Response A1-1
South Coast AQMD staff requested electronic copies of all live modeling and emissions calculation files used to support the Draft EIR’s analysis of air quality impacts. Specifically, the comment requests the following file types:
• CalEEMod input files (.csv and. json),
• EMFAC output files,
• emission calculation spreadsheets (live Excel versions), • AERMOD input/output files and View files,
• HARP input/output and risk assessment spreadsheets, and • any post-processing files used to derive pollutant-specific concentrations.
As of the date of this Final EIR, the Lead Agency has coordinated with the Project’s air quality consultants and provided the requested modeling and calculation files to South Coast AQMD via a secure file-sharing platform. This comment does not raise any substantive concerns regarding the adequacy or conclusions of Draft EIR’s air quality or health risk analysis. Rather, it seeks underlying technical files to assist South Coast AQMD’s review. As such, no changes to the Draft EIR are required in response to this comment.
Comment Letter A2 - South Coast AQMD, August 1, 2025
Response A2-1
This comment references an attached letter from the South Coast AQMD dated August 1, 2024, from Sam Wang, Program Supervisor, CEQA IGR Planning, Rule Development & Implementation to the City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department. Written responses to each of the substantive comments raised in the letter (A2-2 through A2-5) are included in this Final EIR, consistent with State CEQA Guidelines §15088 and Public Resources Code §21092.5(a).
Anaheim Hills Festival Specific Plan Amendment Project Section 2.0 Final Environmental Impact Report Response to Comments
City of Anaheim 6
Response A2-2
South Coast AQMD provides introductory remarks summarizing the Project and outlining the structure of the agency’s comments. As the comment does not raise any specific issues regarding the content or adequacy of the Draft EIR, no further response is necessary.
Response A2-3
The commenter states that the Draft EIR does not include an operational health risk assessment (HRA) or a localized significance threshold (LST) analysis for operational emissions and asserts that such evaluations are necessary due to potential diesel particulate matter (DPM) emissions from mobile sources. The commenter also notes the proximity of sensitive receptors, including residential uses and a nearby medical clinic, and recommends further evaluation of operational air quality impacts.
The Draft EIR appropriately evaluates operational air quality impacts in Section 4.3, consistent with the State CEQA Guidelines, South Coast AQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook, and applicable screening thresholds and methodologies. As explained in Section 4.3.5 (Impact Analysis), under South Coast AQMD LST methodology, LSTs apply to the operational phase of a project only if the project includes substantial stationary sources or attracts mobile sources that may spend extended periods idling on-site (e.g., transfer facilities and warehouse buildings). The Project does not include such uses. Due to the absence of significant stationary source emissions or long-duration queuing and idling activity, an operational LST analysis is not required.
Mobile source emissions associated with typical residential land uses (e.g., passenger vehicles, delivery vans, and landscape maintenance equipment) are generally intermittent, short in duration, and spatially dispersed. These sources do not typically generate localized concentrations of toxic air contaminants (TACs) or DPM at levels that would warrant an HRA under South Coast AQMD guidance. The Draft EIR conservatively accounts for operational emissions from all relevant sources, including mobile, area, and energy sources. As shown in Table 4.3-7, projected operational emissions would not exceed any of the South Coast AQMD’s regional thresholds of significance for criteria pollutants. Therefore, operational air quality impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required.
The commenter has not provided substantial evidence that the Project would result in significant operational air quality impacts not already disclosed in the Draft EIR. The issues raised are general in nature and not supported by project-specific data, technical modeling, or expert opinion. CEQA does not require an EIR to evaluate speculative or minor emission sources that are not reasonably expected to cause significant impacts based on the nature and scale of the proposed development. Accordingly, the Draft EIR’s conclusion that an operational HRA and LST analysis are not warranted is legally adequate and consistent with South Coast AQMD methodology and CEQA requirements. No revisions to the Draft EIR are required in response to this comment. Notwithstanding, the additional operational LST and HRA analysis requested by the commenter has been prepared and is included in Appendix F. The supplemental analysis confirms that the Project would not result in new or more severe operational air quality impacts, and no revisions to the Draft EIR are required.
Response A2-4
The commenter expresses concern regarding the siting of new sensitive receptors, such as residences, in proximity to existing air pollution sources (e.g., freeways and rail lines) and recommends the implementation of health-protective strategies to reduce potential exposure. The commenter also references guidance from the California Air Resources Board (CARB), including the Air Quality and Land Anaheim Hills Festival Specific Plan Amendment Project Section 2.0 Final Environmental Impact Report Response to Comments
City of Anaheim 7
Use Handbook and the Technical Advisory on Strategies to Reduce Air Pollution Exposure Near HighVolume Roadways, and suggests measures such as enhanced HVAC filtration (e.g., MERV 13 or higher), building design features, and vegetative screening.
The Draft EIR evaluates potential air quality impacts in Section 4.3 and concludes that the Project would not result in significant emissions of criteria pollutants or expose sensitive receptors to substantial concentrations of toxic air contaminants (TACs). As explained in Section 4.3.5, the Project does not include substantial stationary sources or high-idling land uses, and mobile source emissions associated with residential uses (e.g., passenger vehicles and service vehicles) are intermittent and widely dispersed. The Draft EIR conservatively modeled operational emissions from all area, energy, and mobile sources using CalEEMod, and found that the Project would not exceed South Coast AQMD’s operational significance thresholds (see Table 4.3-8). Therefore, the Project’s operational air quality impacts would be less than significant and would not require mitigation.
The CARB guidance documents cited by the commenter are advisory in nature and do not establish mandatory thresholds or mitigation requirements under CEQA. While the City acknowledges the public health value of measures such as high-efficiency HVAC filtration or vegetative buffers, such measures are not required unless a project would result in a significant environmental impact. In this case, the commenter has not presented substantial evidence that the Project would expose new residents to significant pollutant concentrations or health risks. Additionally, the Project would comply with applicable California Building Code and Title 24 energy efficiency requirements, including indoor air quality standards that incorporate MERV 13 filtration or equivalent in many new residential buildings.
Moreover, CEQA does not generally require an EIR to evaluate the impacts of existing environmental conditions on future users of a proposed project. This argument, commonly referred to as “reverse CEQA,” was directly addressed by the California Supreme Court in California Building Industry Association v. Bay Area Air Quality Management District (2015) 62 Cal.4th 369. The Court held that CEQA focuses on a project’s impacts on the environment, not the environment’s impact on the project, except in limited circumstances (e.g., school siting, projects in hazardous locations). Because the Project does not fall under one of these statutory exceptions, and because the Draft EIR demonstrates that the Project would not result in significant air quality impacts, no further analysis of existing off-site air pollution sources or mitigation measures to reduce exposure is required under CEQA.
The commenter’s suggestions may inform future project design or Citywide policy discussions, but do not identify a deficiency in the Draft EIR or present new information that would alter its significance conclusions. No revisions to the Draft EIR are required in response to this comment.
Response A2-5
South Coast AQMD cites Public Resources Code §21092.5(a) and State CEQA Guidelines §15088(a)–(c), which require the Lead Agency to evaluate and provide written responses to public agency comments on the Draft EIR and to provide those responses at least 10 days prior to certification of this Final EIR. The commenter further notes that if the Lead Agency’s position differs from the agency’s recommendations, it must explain its reasoning with reference to substantial evidence in the record.
The City acknowledges this procedural request and confirms that this Final EIR includes written responses to each substantive comment received from South Coast AQMD. As required by State CEQA Guidelines §15088 and Public Resources Code §21092.5(a), the responses will be provided to South Coast AQMD and made available to the public at least 10 days prior to certification of this Final EIR. Where the City’s Anaheim Hills Festival Specific Plan Amendment Project Section 2.0 Final Environmental Impact Report Response to Comments
City of Anaheim 8
responses differ from South Coast AQMD’s recommendations, the responses are supported by substantial evidence in the administrative record, consistent with State CEQA Guidelines §15088(c).
Comment Letter A3 – California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) District 12, August 4, 2025 Response A3-1
This comment states that Caltrans appreciate the opportunity to review the Draft EIR. The commenter provides a summary of the Project description. Given that the comment does not raise any specific issues regarding the content or adequacy of the Draft EIR, no further response is necessary.
Response A3-2
This comment states that State Route 91 (SR-91) is owned and operated by Caltrans, and therefore, Caltrans is a commenting agency on the Project. The comment is noted. Given that the comment does not raise any specific issues regarding the content or adequacy of the Draft EIR, no further response is necessary.
Response A3-3
The commenter states that there is a connection between land use and transportation and expresses support for smart growth, multimodal planning, and the City’s efforts to meet its RHNA obligations. Given that the comment does not raise any specific issues regarding the content or adequacy of the Draft EIR, no further response is necessary.
Response A3-4
This comment encourages the use of transit among future residents, visitors, and workers of the Project.
The commenter states that increasing multimodal transportation will lead to a reduction in congestion, vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and improve air quality. This comment is noted. Given that the comment does not raise any specific issues regarding the content or adequacy of the Draft EIR, no further response is necessary.
Response A3-5
This comment encourages the design of Complete Streets that include high-quality pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities that are safe and comfortable for users of all ages and abilities. This comment is noted.
Given that the comment does not raise any specific issues regarding the content or adequacy of the Draft EIR, no further response is necessary.
Response A3-6
This comment expresses Caltrans’ support of the Project’s inclusion of short- and long-term bike parking.
This comment is noted. Given that the comment does not raise any specific issues regarding the content or adequacy of the Draft EIR, no further response is necessary.
Response A3-7
The comment requests that appropriate safety measures and clearly signed detours be provided for bicyclists, pedestrians, and transit users during construction, and recommends the use of "May Use Full Lane" (MUTCD R4-11) signage for any temporary bike lane closures. The comment is acknowledged and will be forwarded to the appropriate City staff and the Property Owner/Developer for consideration during final design and construction planning. Given that the comment does not raise any specific issues regarding the content or adequacy of the Draft EIR, no further response is necessary.
Anaheim Hills Festival Specific Plan Amendment Project Section 2.0 Final Environmental Impact Report Response to Comments
City of Anaheim 9
Response A3-8
The commenter requests information on how freight vehicles currently serve the existing retail center and how the Project may affect truck turning movements or goods delivery logistics. This comment is noted; however, the comment does not raise a significant environmental issue or identify a deficiency in the Draft EIR under CEQA. Because the comment does not relate to the adequacy or accuracy of the environmental analysis, no further response is required under CEQA. Nonetheless, as noted in the Draft EIR, the Project would be subject to City design review and must comply with applicable standards to ensure that circulation and loading access remain adequate. No revisions to the Draft EIR are required in response to this comment.
Response A3-9
The commenter requests that a commercial truck circulation plan be provided, including turning templates (e.g., WB-50), identification of off-street loading zones, and confirmation that truck movements will not conflict with high pedestrian activity or parking areas. The commenter also requests confirmation that updated driveway designs will support both multimodal access and freight compatibility.
This comment is acknowledged; however, the comment does not raise a significant environmental issue under CEQA or identify a deficiency in the Draft EIR. Rather, it pertains to site-level design and operational considerations that fall within the scope of the City’s development review and permitting process.
Nonetheless, the Project would be required to comply with applicable City design standards related to circulation, driveway design, and loading access.
Response A3-10
The commenter requests that the Caltrans Freight-Focused Land Use Compatibility Planning Matrix be used to evaluate whether the Project’s modified land use mix may conflict with regional freight operations, given the Project’s location within a commercial area currently served by freight activity. This comment is acknowledged. The Freight-Focused Land Use Compatibility Planning Matrix is a planning guidance tool developed by Caltrans to assist local jurisdictions in considering freight compatibility when introducing new sensitive uses near freight corridors or facilities. However, the matrix is not a CEQA significance threshold or regulatory standard, and its application is not required under CEQA.
The Project would not directly interfere with regional freight infrastructure such as rail lines, intermodal facilities, or designated truck routes. The Project would be required to comply with City land use and circulation policies that ensure safe and compatible site design, including setbacks, screening, and internal circulation plans that minimize potential conflicts between residential uses and commercial loading areas.
Furthermore, the Project site is not located adjacent to heavy industrial or high-frequency freight operations that would typically present elevated land use compatibility concerns. The City retains land use authority to determine appropriate zoning and site planning approaches, and no evidence has been presented that the Project would result in a significant land use conflict under CEQA. Therefore, no revisions to the Draft EIR are required in response to this comment.
Response A3-11
The commenter requests that the EIR include a policy consistency analysis with SCAG’s Goods Movement Appendix and Caltrans’ freight strategies, particularly regarding retail centers near regional highway corridors. This comment is noted. However, the comment does not raise a significant environmental issue or identify a deficiency in the Draft EIR under CEQA. The EIR includes consistency analysis with applicable land use and transportation plans, including SCAG’s Connect SoCal 2024, as required by State CEQA Anaheim Hills Festival Specific Plan Amendment Project Section 2.0 Final Environmental Impact Report Response to Comments
City of Anaheim 10
Guidelines §15125 and §15126.2(d). The Project would introduce 447 multiple-family dwelling units to an existing commercial center and would maintain access to regional highway corridors, and would not impede goods movement or freight operations. Site access and circulation would comply with City standards to support safe and efficient freight and vehicle movement. No revisions to the Draft EIR are required in response to this comment.
Response A3-12
The commenter recommends that, if future analysis identifies significant impacts on State transportation facilities, the City coordinate with Caltrans District 12 Local Development to prepare a Traffic Mitigation Agreement or similar mechanism.
This comment is acknowledged. However, the comment does not raise a new significant environmental issue or identify a deficiency in the Draft EIR. Should future refinements to the Project or subsequent review identify new or more severe impacts on State facilities, the City and the Property Owner/Developer will coordinate with Caltrans as appropriate, including consideration of a Traffic Mitigation Agreement if warranted. No revisions to the Draft EIR are required in response to this comment.
Response A3-13
The commenter provides information regarding Caltrans requirements for any work within the State rightof-way, including the need for discretionary review, an encroachment permit, and completion of the QMAP Checklist (Form TR-0416) to determine whether coordination with a Caltrans Project Manager is necessary. The commenter also outlines submittal requirements for the Encroachment Permit Application Package through the Caltrans Encroachment Permit System.
This comment is acknowledged. However, the comment does not raise a significant environmental issue or identify a deficiency in the Draft EIR. The Project does not propose any construction or improvements within Caltrans right-of-way and therefore would not require an encroachment permit. Should future design modifications result in any work within the State right-of-way, the Property Owner/Developer would be required to obtain all necessary permits and approvals from Caltrans or any other applicable agency. The information provided will be included in the administrative record and shared with the Property Owner/Developer for reference. No revisions to the Draft EIR are required in response to this comment.
Response A3-14
The commenter provides detailed guidance regarding Caltrans submittal requirements for any future encroachment permit, including the need for plans to be signed and stamped by a licensed engineer, clear labeling of Caltrans right-of-way features, and inclusion of supporting documents such as environmental clearance documentation, traffic control and management plans, drainage and construction plans, and certifications as applicable.
This comment is acknowledged. However, the comment does not raise a significant environmental issue or identify a deficiency in the Draft EIR. As noted previously, the Project does not propose any work within Caltrans right-of-way and therefore does not require an encroachment permit. If future design modifications involve work within the State right-of-way, the Property Owner/Developer will be required to prepare and submit all necessary plans and documentation in accordance with Caltrans’ permit requirements and review process. The information provided will be forwarded to the Property Anaheim Hills Festival Specific Plan Amendment Project Section 2.0 Final Environmental Impact Report Response to Comments
City of Anaheim 11
Owner/Developer for consideration during final design and permitting. No revisions to the Draft EIR are required in response to this comment.
Response A3-15
The commenter refers to Table 4-1 on page 33 of the Traffic Impact Analysis (Appendix 4.17-2 of the Draft EIR) and requests that trip generation rates for other land uses be shown for reference alongside the Project. This comment is acknowledged. However, the comment does not raise a significant environmental issue under CEQA or identify a deficiency in the Draft EIR. The requested comparative rates for existing or previously entitled uses are not required for determining significance under CEQA but may be reviewed in supporting technical documents or provided during future design or planning review, if relevant. No revisions to the Draft EIR are required in response to this comment.
Notwithstanding, to be responsive to this comment, the trip generation rate for the shopping center has been added to Table 4-1; however, no rates are provided for the Cinema. As noted in the footnote in Table 4-3, the trips associated with the Cinema are taken directly from the prior referenced study. The complete revised Traffic Analysis is provided as Appendix D.
Land Use1
ITE
LU
Code
Units2
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily
In Out Total In Out Total
Multifamily (Mid-Rise)
Residential 221 DU 0.09 0.28 0.37 0.24 0.15 0.39 4.54
Shopping Center >150,000 SF 820 TSF 0.52 0.32 0.84 1.63 1.77 3.40 37.01 1 Trip Generation Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation Manual, Eleventh Edition (2021) 2 DU = Dwelling Units; TSF = Thousand Square Feet
Response A3-16
The commenter requests that the traffic movement and volume exhibits be revised to remove any turning movements that do not physically exist at study intersections, such as at Intersections #13 and #14, because it is difficult to distinguish between movements with zero volume and those that are not present due to geometric constraints. This comment is acknowledged. The comment does not raise a significant environmental issue under CEQA or identify a deficiency in the Draft EIR’s traffic analysis. CEQA does not require the removal of unused turning movements from volume exhibits for purposes of determining traffic-related impact significance.
Notwithstanding, to enhance clarity and to be responsive to the commenter’s request, the traffic volume exhibits have been updated to remove northbound left-turn and southbound left-turn movements at ramp intersections that do not physically exist (previously shown with zero volumes). This correction has been applied to all ramp locations (four intersections total) in the study area. The revisions are reflected in all updated traffic volume exhibits in the Traffic Analysis, which is included in its entirety as Appendix D to this Final EIR. These corrections do not alter the technical analysis, conclusions, or significance determinations presented in the Draft EIR. Therefore, no revisions to the Draft EIR text are required under State CEQA Guidelines §§15088.
Response A3-17
The commenter refers to Table 4-3 on page 34 of the Traffic Impact Analysis and requests verification that trip credits associated with the former cinema use were not double counted, particularly if the Opening Year traffic volumes already account for existing conditions with the vacant cinema. This comment is Anaheim Hills Festival Specific Plan Amendment Project Section 2.0 Final Environmental Impact Report Response to Comments
City of Anaheim 12
acknowledged. As described in the Traffic Impact Analysis, the trip generation data in Table 4-3 is provided for informational purposes only to facilitate comparison between the Project and the entitled use scenario. Because the cinema was vacant at the time of the traffic counts and analysis, no trip credits were applied for that use. For purposes of the near-term and long-range traffic forecasts, the trip generation shown for the Project in Table 4-2 was applied, without any adjustment for the prior cinema use.
Accordingly, the analysis does not double-count trips associated with the former cinema use, and the methodology is consistent with standard traffic engineering practice and CEQA requirements. No revisions to the Draft EIR are required in response to this comment.
Response A3-18
The commenter refers to Section 4.7 on page 42 of the Traffic Impact Analysis (Appendix 4.17-2 of the Draft EIR) and requests verification of whether any existing land uses on the Project site were vacant during the 2024 traffic counts. The commenter notes that additional trip credits should not be applied and states that a significant amount of trip credit was taken during the PM peak hour and daily periods.
Please refer to Response A3-17. No revisions to the Draft EIR are required in response to this comment.
Response A3-19
The commenter requests correction of a labeling error in footnote 3, changing “I-215” to “SR-91,” and verification of all related tables. This comment is acknowledged. The comment does not raise a significant environmental issue or identify a deficiency in the Draft EIR, but the correction is noted. The labeling of “I-215” in footnote 3 is a typographical error; it should reference “SR-91.” The Traffic Engineer has revised the affected footnote in Table 6-3 and verified that all related tables are accurate. This correction is minor and does not affect the analysis or conclusions of the EIR. No revisions to the Draft EIR are required in response to this comment.
Response A3-20
The commenter requests clarification regarding the baseline year used in the VMT analysis, noting an apparent reference to “linear interpolation” and questioning the years reflected in the baseline and cumulative scenarios. This comment is acknowledged. The reference to “linear interpolation” in the VMT analysis was a typographical error and has been removed. This clarification does not affect the methodology, results, or conclusions of the Draft EIR. As stated in the City of Anaheim Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines (page 8), “Baseline” and “Baseline plus Project” conditions reflect information contained in the Orange County Transportation Analysis Model (OCTAM) base year model run. This reference is provided in the footnote to Table 2 of the VMT Analysis. For the VMT analysis, all references to “baseline” correspond to the 2016 OCTAM base year. The corrected VMT Analysis is provided as Appendix E of this Final EIR. No further response is required.
Response A3-21
The commenter requests that the source and publication date of the “Handbook” cited on page 7 of the VMT Analysis be provided for reference. This comment is acknowledged. However, the comment does not raise a significant environmental issue or identify a deficiency in the Draft EIR, but clarification is provided for completeness.
The cited “Handbook” refers to the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) Handbook for Analyzing Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions, Assessing Climate Vulnerabilities, and Advancing Health and Equity (December 2021), as noted on page 5 of the VMT Analysis Report. No revisions to the Draft EIR are required in response to this comment.
Anaheim Hills Festival Specific Plan Amendment Project Section 2.0 Final Environmental Impact Report Response to Comments
City of Anaheim 13
Response A3-22
The commenter asks for the average U.S. residential density and a comparison with the Project’s density to support the use of CAPCOA Measure T-1. According to the 2021 CAPCOA Handbook, the national average residential density is 9.1 dwelling units per acre. The Project proposes 447 units on approximately
16.2 acres, resulting in a residential density of about 28 units per acre, significantly higher than the national average and consistent with the intent of Measure T-1. As stated in the VMT Analysis, the Project’s land use inputs were incorporated into the OCTAM model, and any associated VMT-reducing effect from higher residential density is already reflected in the modeled VMT estimates shown in Table
4. No additional VMT reduction credit was applied. No changes to the Draft EIR are required in response to this comment.
Response A3-23
The commenter encourages continued coordination with Caltrans for any future development that may affect State transportation facilities and provides contact information for further inquiries. This comment is acknowledged. However, the comment does not raise a significant environmental issue or identify a deficiency in the Draft EIR. The City and the Property Owner/Developer will continue to coordinate with Caltrans, as appropriate, to ensure compliance with applicable requirements for any future improvements that may affect State facilities. No changes to the Draft EIR are required in response to this comment.
Anaheim Hills Festival Specific Plan Amendment Project Section 2.0 Final Environmental Impact Report Response to Comments
City of Anaheim 14
2.3.2 COMMENT LETTERS AND RESPONSES: ORGANIZATIONS (B)
Comment Letter B1 – Supports Alliance for Environmental Responsibility (SAFER), June 30, 2025 Response B1-1
On June 30, 2025, Chase Preciado, Legal Assistant at Lozeau Drury LLP, submitted an email on behalf of the Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility (SAFER), transmitting a comment letter on the Draft EIR for the Project. The email requests confirmation of receipt and does not raise additional substantive CEQA issues beyond those included in the attached letter. The City acknowledges receipt of the June 30, 2025, email and attached comment letter from Lozeau Drury LLP on behalf of SAFER. As required by State CEQA Guidelines §15088, a written response to the substantive comment in the attached letter is provided in this Final EIR (see Response to Comment B1-2). No further response to the transmittal email is required.
Response B1-2
Lozeau Drury LLP submitted this comment on behalf of SAFER, expressing concern that the Draft EIR for the Project fails to serve as an adequate informational document under CEQA and fails to impose all feasible mitigation measures to reduce project impacts. The commenter requests that the City prepare and recirculate a revised Draft EIR and reserves the right to supplement its comments during the administrative process. The City acknowledges this general comment. State CEQA Guidelines §15151 establishes that an EIR should be prepared with sufficient detail to allow the public and decision-makers to understand the significant effects of a proposed project. The Draft EIR complies with this standard by disclosing potentially significant environmental impacts, identifying feasible mitigation measures, and providing substantial evidence in support of its conclusions. The document is also supported by comprehensive technical studies addressing air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, transportation, biological resources, and other environmental issues.
As this comment does not raise specific factual, technical, or legal deficiencies with the analysis or mitigation measures presented in the Draft EIR, no revisions or recirculation are required. Under State CEQA Guidelines §15088.5, recirculation is only required when significant new information is added to the EIR after public review, which is not the case here. The City remains open to receiving and considering additional comments submitted during the CEQA process and will ensure that all public input is addressed in accordance with CEQA. No changes to the Draft EIR are required in response to this comment.
Anaheim Hills Festival Specific Plan Amendment Project Section 2.0 Final Environmental Impact Report Response to Comments
City of Anaheim 15
Comment Letter B2 – Western States Regional Council of Carpenters Response B2-1
The commenter, the Western States Regional Council of Carpenters (WSRCC), provides introductory remarks summarizing the Project description and expressing general interest in environmental review and proper land use planning. The commenter reserves the right to supplement its comments at or before future hearings, incorporates by reference all other comments submitted on the Draft EIR prior to certification, and requests to receive future CEQA and Planning and Zoning Law notices.
This comment is acknowledged. As of the close of the public review period, this is the only comment letter received from WSRCC. No specific environmental issue or alleged deficiency in the Draft EIR is raised in this portion of the letter. The City will add WSRCC to the mailing list for all future CEQA notices related to the Project in accordance with Public Resources Code §§21092.2 and 21167(f), and Government Code §65092. No revisions to the Draft EIR are required in response to this comment.
Response B2-2
The commenter encourages the City to require the use of a local, state-certified workforce and cites potential environmental and economic benefits, including reduced greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and VMT. This comment is acknowledged. CEQA does not require analysis of labor practices unless their absence would result in a significant physical environmental impact. The Draft EIR evaluates GHG and VMT impacts using standard modeling assumptions and does not rely on workforce location or training status for its conclusions. Local hire provisions may be considered by the City as part of project approvals, but are outside the scope of CEQA. No revisions to the Draft EIR are required in response to this comment.
Response B2-3
The commenter requests that the City require detailed infectious disease prevention protocols and training during construction, including COVID-19 screening procedures and the use of workers trained in Infection Control Risk Assessment (ICRA) protocols.
This comment is acknowledged. As of the time of this Final EIR, there are no active statewide or local emergency declarations related to COVID-19, and the California Department of Public Health has lifted nearly all pandemic-era mandates. CEQA does not require the imposition of specific occupational health and safety measures unless their absence would result in a significant physical environmental impact. The Draft EIR fully evaluates construction-related impacts, including air quality and health risk, and identifies mitigation measures where appropriate. The Project will comply with all applicable worker health and safety regulations, including those administered by Cal/OSHA. Any additional health and safety protocols adopted by the contractor or required by the City through its permitting authority are beyond the scope of CEQA. No revisions to the Draft EIR are required in response to this comment.
Response B2-4
The commenter provides a summary of CEQA requirements, including legal standards for EIRs, the fair argument test, and the conditions under which recirculation is required. The commenter asserts that the Draft EIR fails to substantiate its conclusions, does not fully assess environmental impacts, and lacks sufficient mitigation measures, and therefore must be revised and recirculated.
This comment is acknowledged. However, it does not identify a specific factual or analytical deficiency in the Draft EIR. The Draft EIR was prepared in full compliance with CEQA, including the requirements for disclosure, analysis, and mitigation of significant environmental impacts. Substantial evidence supports Anaheim Hills Festival Specific Plan Amendment Project Section 2.0 Final Environmental Impact Report Response to Comments
City of Anaheim 16
the impact conclusions, and mitigation measures have been identified and incorporated where required.
As no significant new information has been presented that would trigger the need for recirculation under State CEQA Guidelines §15088.5, no revisions or recirculation of the Draft EIR are required in response to this comment.
Response B2-5
The commenter asserts that the Draft EIR fails to support its conclusions with substantial evidence and must be revised and recirculated under CEQA. The commenter references legal standards related to significance thresholds, mitigation requirements, and evidentiary support for EIR findings, but does not identify any specific impact area where the DEIR's analysis is deficient.
This comment is acknowledged. The Draft EIR was prepared consistent with State CEQA Guidelines and includes substantial evidence to support its findings and conclusions. The analysis relies on scientific and factual data, technical studies, modeling tools, and agency-adopted thresholds to determine significance and to identify feasible mitigation measures. The Draft EIR does not dismiss any potentially significant effects without explanation or evidentiary support. To the extent that subsequent comments raise specific concerns about particular issue areas, responses are provided below. However, the general assertion that the Draft EIR lacks substantial evidence does not, on its own, demonstrate a need for revision or recirculation under State CEQA Guidelines §15088.5. No changes to the Draft EIR are required in response to this comment.
Response B2-6
The commenter raises concerns regarding the adequacy of the Draft EIR’s construction noise analysis.
Specifically, the commenter claims that the EIR misapplies the City’s Noise Ordinance by using a 60 dBA threshold rather than the 65 dBA CNEL standard in Anaheim Municipal Code (AMC) Section 18.40.090, and that the noise analysis underestimates impacts at receptors R3 and R4 due to the placement of monitoring equipment. However, the commenter also references language and receptor locations (e.g., residences along North La Brea Avenue) that are not part of this Project or EIR, and appear to be taken from a different project entirely. Those portions of the comment are not applicable and are not addressed further.
With respect to the commenter’s claim that the EIR misapplies the City’s Noise Ordinance by using a 60 dBA threshold rather than the 65 dBA CNEL standard set forth in Anaheim Municipal Code Section
18.40.090, the commenter is incorrect in the applicability of this noise standard as the Project site is not located within 600 feet of any railroad, freeway, expressway, major arterial, primary arterial or secondary arterial, as designated by the General Plan Circulation Element. Further, while the City’s Noise Ordinance establishes a noise level limit of 60 dBA, Anaheim Municipal Code Section 6.70.010 exempts construction activities from the City’s noise standards between the hours of 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM. The Draft EIR includes modeled construction noise levels at representative receptors, including R3 and R4, and acknowledges that temporary exceedances may occur. However, these exceedances would be shortterm, intermittent, and restricted to the City’s allowed construction hours under Anaheim Municipal Code Section 6.70.010. Therefore, construction noise impacts were determined to be less than significant, and no mitigation is required.
In conclusion, the commenter has not provided substantial evidence that the modeling or measurement locations were improper or that the analysis fails to capture representative conditions. No revisions to the Draft EIR are required in response to this comment.
Anaheim Hills Festival Specific Plan Amendment Project Section 2.0 Final Environmental Impact Report Response to Comments
City of Anaheim 17
Response B2-7
The commenter asserts that the Draft EIR fails to adequately evaluate impacts to nesting birds and that reliance on Regulatory Compliance Measure (RCM) BIO-1 is insufficient.
As discussed in Section 4.4 of the Draft EIR, the Project site is fully developed and supports ornamental vegetation but no native habitat or special-status species. The Draft EIR acknowledges the potential for existing trees to support nesting migratory birds protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and California Fish and Game Code (CFGC) and concludes that compliance with applicable wildlife protection laws will avoid significant impacts.
RCM BIO-1 requires a qualified biologist to conduct pre-construction nesting bird surveys and prepare a Nesting Bird Plan with protective buffers if active nests are found. While the measure identifies February– August as the typical nesting season, it does not preclude surveys or protections outside that period. The requirement applies regardless of timing. RCM BIO-1 is included in both the Project’s Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) and as a condition of approval. It is therefore fully enforceable pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines §15097 and Public Resources Code §21081.6.
CEQA allows lead agencies to rely on compliance with existing regulations where supported by substantial evidence (State CEQA Guidelines §15064(d)). The Draft EIR provides such evidence here. The comment does not present substantial evidence of a potentially significant impact not already addressed in the DEIR. Therefore, no additional mitigation or recirculation is required.
Response B2-8
The commenter asserts that the Draft EIR fails to adequately analyze or mitigate potential biological resources impacts associated with the proposed removal of 211 on-site trees, and that the City’s reliance on compliance with the local Tree Preservation Ordinance is insufficient under CEQA.
As discussed in Section 4.4 of the Draft EIR and the Specimen Tree Report (Appendix 4.4-1 of the Draft EIR), the Project site is developed with ornamental landscaping and does not contain native vegetation, riparian habitat, or special-status species. The biological resources analysis appropriately focuses on potential impacts to nesting birds protected under the MBTA and CFGC, which are addressed through implementation of RCM BIO-1. This regulatory compliance measure requires pre-construction surveys and protective buffers, if needed, and is included in the Project’s MMP and as a condition of approval, ensuring enforceability under State CEQA Guidelines §15097 and Public Resources Code §21081.6.
The commenter is correct that the Project proposes removal of 211 trees; however, as documented in the Specimen Tree Report, none of the trees meet the City’s definition of “specimen trees” and are therefore not subject to mandatory replacement under the City’s Tree Preservation Ordinance. The Draft EIR discloses this regulatory framework and correctly concludes that removal of these trees would not result in significant impacts to biological resources as defined under CEQA. CEQA does not require mitigation for aesthetic or non-biological concerns unless those features support habitat for protected species, which is not the case here.
The Draft EIR’s conclusions are supported by substantial evidence, and no new information or analysis is required to demonstrate compliance with CEQA. Therefore, no revisions or recirculation of the Draft EIR are warranted in response to this comment.
Anaheim Hills Festival Specific Plan Amendment Project Section 2.0 Final Environmental Impact Report Response to Comments
City of Anaheim 18
Response B2-9
The commenter generally asserts that the Draft EIR fails to include adequate mitigation measures but does not identify any specific impact or mitigation measure that is deficient. As such, the comment does not raise a significant environmental issue or provide substantial evidence requiring further response under State CEQA Guidelines §15088. The Draft EIR meets CEQA’s requirements by identifying all significant environmental impacts and proposing specific, feasible, and enforceable mitigation measures or regulatory compliance measures. All measures are included in the Project’s MMP and will be imposed as conditions of approval. No mitigation is improperly deferred, and all measures include performance standards consistent with State CEQA Guidelines §15126.4. No revisions to the Draft EIR are required in response to this comment.
Response B2-10
The commenter generally asserts that the Draft EIR’s mitigation measures are improperly deferred. This assertion is unfounded. As required by State CEQA Guidelines §15126.4(a)(1)(B), the Draft EIR includes enforceable mitigation measures that clearly specify performance standards, identify the responsible implementing party, and establish the timing and method of implementation. The City has not deferred formulation of mitigation; rather, where project-specific implementation details may depend on future conditions (e.g., biological pre-construction surveys, preparation of construction management plans), the Draft EIR includes clearly defined performance criteria that must be met, subject to City review and approval. These are not instances of unlawful deferral, but rather consistent with well-established CEQA precedent allowing limited deferral where full formulation of the measure is impractical at the time of EIR preparation. Moreover, all mitigation measures have been incorporated into the Project’s MMP in accordance with Public Resources Code §21081.6 and will be imposed as conditions of approval. The City has therefore committed itself to the implementation of all feasible mitigation necessary to avoid or substantially lessen the Project’s significant impacts. Accordingly, the Draft EIR complies with CEQA’s requirements for enforceable and effective mitigation. No revisions to the Draft EIR are required in response to this comment.
Response B2-11
The commenter asserts that Mitigation Measure (MM) CUL-2 in the Draft EIR improperly defers formulation of cultural resource mitigation procedures and precludes meaningful public and agency review. However, this assertion is based on a misreading of the Draft EIR. There is no “Mitigation Measure CUL-2” included in the Draft EIR or the MMP for the Project. The sole mitigation measure addressing cultural resources is identified as MM CUL-1, which appears in Section 4.5.5 of the Draft EIR (see p. 4.5- 11) and is fully incorporated into the MMP as an enforceable measure.
MM CUL-1 is consistent with State CEQA Guidelines §15126.4(a)(1)(B), which allows lead agencies to adopt mitigation that includes performance standards and specifies procedures to be followed in the event of an unanticipated discovery of archaeological resources. MM CUL-1 does not constitute improper deferral. Rather, it (1) commits the Property Owner/Developer to archaeological monitoring during grading in undisturbed soils, (2) requires that work be halted in the event of a find, and (3) mandates treatment and evaluation in accordance with Public Resources Code §21083.2 and State CEQA Guidelines §15064.5. These procedures ensure compliance with CEQA’s requirements for treatment of unique archaeological resources and are consistent with established CEQA practice.
Anaheim Hills Festival Specific Plan Amendment Project Section 2.0 Final Environmental Impact Report Response to Comments
City of Anaheim 19
While the commenter argues that the Draft EIR fails to provide sufficient detail to assess the measure’s effectiveness, CEQA does not require that all implementation details be known or finalized at the time of EIR certification. Courts have repeatedly held that performance-based mitigation is permissible where further site-specific detail is not feasible at the time of environmental review and the measure ensures enforceability and effectiveness. (Oakland Heritage Alliance v. City of Oakland (2011) 195 Cal.App.4th 884, 906; Defend the Bay v. City of Irvine (2004) 119 Cal.App.4th 1261, 1275.) Because the commenter misidentifies the mitigation measure and MM CUL-1 complies with CEQA both procedurally and substantively, no revisions to the Draft EIR are required.
Response B2-12
The commenter contends that MM GEO-1 and MM GEO-2 improperly defer mitigation and fail to meet CEQA’s standard for enforceable and specific mitigation. MM GEO-1 requires that all project grading, foundation, structural, and related construction plans be reviewed by the City of Anaheim’s Building Division and Public Works Department for compliance with the recommendations contained in the Project’s Geotechnical Exploration and Feasibility Report (Appendix 4.7-1 of the Draft EIR). The referenced report provides site-specific design recommendations based on subsurface investigation and laboratory testing, including seismic ground shaking, expansive soils, foundation and retaining wall design, and slope stability. These recommendations are specific and tailored to the site’s geologic conditions and are intended to ensure that geologic hazards are appropriately addressed. Incorporating these recommendations into construction plans, subject to review and approval by City departments prior to issuance of grading and building permits, constitutes a standard and legally acceptable form of mitigation under CEQA. Courts have repeatedly upheld the adequacy of mitigation measures that require adherence to the recommendations of a technical study prepared for the project, where those recommendations are specific, performance-based, and subject to implementation through subsequent permit review and conditions of approval. (See San Franciscans Upholding the Downtown Plan v. City and County of San Francisco (2002) 102 Cal.App.4th 656, 695.) MM GEO-1 is not an open-ended or speculative commitment; it incorporates specific engineering recommendations based on substantial evidence and ensures their enforceable application during project construction. The measure is also included in the Draft EIR’s MMP and will be incorporated as a condition of approval, ensuring implementation and enforceability.
MM GEO-2 similarly meets CEQA’s requirements for mitigation of potential impacts to paleontological resources. The measure requires that in the event of inadvertent discovery of such resources, the contractor must cease all earth-disturbing activities within a 50-foot radius, and a qualified paleontologist must evaluate the find and determine an appropriate course of action. The measure provides a clear protocol, including avoidance where feasible and salvage where necessary. This approach is consistent with State CEQA Guidelines §15064.5 and has been upheld as an appropriate mitigation strategy for unanticipated discoveries of subsurface resources. (See Oakland Heritage Alliance v. City of Oakland (2011) 195 Cal.App.4th 884, 906)
Both MM GEO-1 and MM GEO-2 are supported by substantial evidence, contain clear performance standards, and are enforceable through the City’s MMP and permit conditions. They are consistent with CEQA and do not constitute unlawful deferral. Accordingly, no revisions to the Draft EIR are required in response to this comment.
Anaheim Hills Festival Specific Plan Amendment Project Section 2.0 Final Environmental Impact Report Response to Comments
City of Anaheim 20
Response B2-13
The commenter asserts that MM HAZ-1 improperly defers mitigation by requiring the Construction Management Plan (CMP) to be prepared prior to grading permit issuance, rather than during the environmental review process. This argument misstates the legal standards applicable to mitigation under CEQA and misconstrues the nature and function of MM HAZ-1. MM HAZ-1 requires the Property Owner/Developer to prepare a CMP in coordination with Anaheim Fire & Rescue and in accordance with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) prior to issuance of grading permits. The CMP must identify emergency access points and routes throughout all construction phases. The measure clearly specifies the timing of compliance, identifies the responsible reviewing agency, and imposes enforceable performance standards related to emergency access. It is also included in the Project’s MMP, ensuring that its implementation is subject to monitoring and enforcement by the Lead Agency. Contrary to the commenter’s claim, CEQA does not prohibit all instances in which the details of a mitigation measure are finalized after certification of an EIR. State CEQA Guidelines §15126.4(a)(1)(B) expressly allows deferral of the specific design or implementation of a mitigation measure where it is impractical or infeasible to provide full detail at the time of environmental review, so long as the agency commits to the performance of mitigation and articulates performance standards and a process for ensuring compliance. (See Oakland Heritage Alliance v. City of Oakland (2011) 195 Cal. App.4th 884, 906; Defend the Bay v. City of Irvine (2004) 119 Cal. App.4th 1261, 1275.) MM HAZ-1 satisfies these standards. It commits the Property Owner/Developer to the preparation of a CMP consistent with applicable safety standards, subject to review and approval by the City’s emergency services agency, and prior to any physical site disturbance.
The requirement to prepare a CMP prior to grading permits is consistent with standard practice for construction-phase mitigation and allows site-specific conditions and construction phasing plans to be incorporated into the CMP in coordination with the City’s permitting authorities. This approach ensures a more effective and implementable mitigation strategy than a generalized plan prepared during CEQA review.
In addition, the Project’s Fire Protection Plan (Appendix 4.9-3 of the Draft EIR) and Evacuation Travel Time Analysis (Appendix 4.9-2 of the Draft EIR) provide further analysis and evidence supporting the adequacy of emergency access and hazard mitigation under the proposed development scenario. These documents reinforce the conclusion that MM HAZ-1, when implemented in combination with regulatory requirements and other mitigation measures, will reduce potential hazards-related impacts to a less-thansignificant level. Accordingly, MM HAZ-1 does not constitute an improper deferral of mitigation. It is legally adequate under CEQA, enforceable through the MMP, and no revisions or recirculation of the Draft EIR are required in response to this comment.
Response B2-14
The commenter asserts that the Draft EIR improperly classifies mitigation measures as Project Design Features (PDFs), specifically PDFs HAZ-1 and HAZ-2 (fire safety and evacuation plans) and PDFs TRANS-1 and TRANS-2 (VMT reduction strategies), and thereby unlawfully avoids the duty to adopt and analyze mitigation under CEQA. This assertion is not supported by CEQA law or the substantial evidence in the administrative record. As a threshold matter, CEQA allows lead agencies to consider a project’s design features, including applicant-proposed actions that avoid or reduce impacts, as part of the impact analysis and significance determination. State CEQA Guidelines §15126.4(a)(1)(A) expressly states that:
“Mitigation measures are not required for effects which are not found to be significant. Measures which are required as part of the project design should be distinguished from measures which are proposed to minimize significant effects.” Here, the Project Design Features were proposed by the Property Anaheim Hills Festival Specific Plan Amendment Project Section 2.0 Final Environmental Impact Report Response to Comments
City of Anaheim 21
Owner/Developer as components of the Project and are part of the Project Description. They were not formulated in response to a finding of significant impact and were not relied upon to reduce impacts to a less-than-significant level. As such, they are appropriately characterized as PDFs.
PDF HAZ-1, the Construction Fire Prevention Plan, is a standard fire safety protocol required by Anaheim Fire & Rescue for large-scale construction sites in wildland-urban interface areas. It outlines best management practices to prevent accidental ignition during site disturbance and building activities. The Draft EIR does not rely on PDF HAZ-1 to mitigate a significant hazard impact under CEQA. Rather, the Draft EIR concludes, based on substantial evidence, including consultation with the City's emergency services departments and compliance with California Fire Code access and suppression requirements, that the Project would not expose people or structures to a significant wildfire hazard or impair an adopted emergency response or evacuation plan. This conclusion is supported by the Evacuation Travel Time Analysis (Appendix 4.9-2 of the Draft EIR), the Fire Protection Plan (Appendix 4.9-3 of the Draft EIR), and the Project’s code-compliant emergency access design described in Section 4.9 of the Draft EIR.
PDF HAZ-2, the Wildfire Evacuation and Awareness Plan, further supplements emergency preparedness through public education, tenant communication protocols, and on-site alert systems. It is not a mitigation measure to reduce physical impacts; it serves a planning and communication function and is not tied to any quantified evacuation travel time threshold or deficiency. As the Draft EIR explains, under both modeled evacuation scenarios (i.e., Deer Canyon Park Preserve and SR-91/SR-241 Interchange) the Project would result in evacuation travel time increases (14–22 minutes) that are not considered significant under CEQA, particularly because: (1) the City has not adopted a quantitative threshold of significance for evacuation travel time; (2) the analysis was conservatively modeled as a full-capacity, unassisted evacuation; and (3) the Anaheim Police Department and Anaheim Fire & Rescue confirmed that the Project does not necessitate modifications to the existing Know Your Way program or present a conflict with adopted plans.
Similarly, PDF TRANS-1 (affordable housing) and PDF TRANS-2 (reduced parking) are not mitigation measures designed to reduce otherwise significant transportation impacts. As shown in the VMT analysis (Appendix 4.17-2 of the Draft EIR), the Project achieves a per capita VMT that is 10.4 percent below the City’s baseline average. No additional credit is assumed from either PDF, and they are not needed to reach a less-than-significant conclusion under State CEQA Guidelines §15064.3(b).
The commenter’s reliance on Lotus v. Department of Transportation (2014) 223 Cal.App.4th 645 is misplaced. That case held that measures essential to a less-than-significant impact determination must be treated as mitigation under CEQA. In contrast, the Project’s Project Design Features are not required to avoid or reduce a significant impact but rather reflect voluntary design elements that exceed regulatory requirements and are not necessary to support the Draft EIR’s less-than-significant impact findings. The Project Design Features in question were not adopted to mitigate a significant effect, are not relied upon to reduce an otherwise significant impact to less-than-significant and were appropriately included in the Project description and environmental analysis. No recirculation or revisions are required.
Response B2-15
The commenter asserts that the Draft EIR is legally inadequate under CEQA and must be revised and recirculated. They claim the document fails to support its conclusions with substantial evidence and improperly defers or mischaracterizes mitigation measures. The City acknowledges the commenter’s concerns but disagrees that recirculation of the Draft EIR is required. As detailed in the responses above, Anaheim Hills Festival Specific Plan Amendment Project Section 2.0 Final Environmental Impact Report Response to Comments
City of Anaheim 22
the Draft EIR complies with CEQA’s procedural and substantive requirements. It discloses potentially significant environmental effects, supports its conclusions with substantial evidence in the record— including modeling, technical studies, and expert input—and identifies all feasible mitigation measures where necessary. The commenter has not presented new significant information or substantial evidence that would trigger recirculation under State CEQA Guidelines §15088.5. Accordingly, the Draft EIR remains legally adequate, and no revisions or recirculation are required in response to this comment.
2.3.3 COMMENT LETTERS AND RESPONSES: INDIVIDUALS (C)
Comment Letter C1 – Rich Fagner, June 20, 2025
Response C1-1
The commenter expresses general opposition to the size of the Project and raises concerns about emergency evacuation capacity in the surrounding area. The commenter states that emergency evacuation is already difficult and that adding hundreds of new residents would worsen this condition by increasing pressure on already strained streets. The commenter urges the City to consider these factors when evaluating the scale of the Project.
The comment regarding evacuation concerns is acknowledged. However, this comment does not address the Draft EIR’s adequacy or raise a significant environmental issue. As such, no further response is necessary. Nonetheless, in the interest of public transparency and responsiveness, the City provides the following clarification.
As described in Draft EIR Section 4.9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, and supported by technical studies in Draft EIR Appendices 4.9-2 (Evacuation Travel Time Analysis) and 4.15-3 (Fire Protection Plan), the Project site is located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ). Accordingly, the EIR includes a robust evaluation of wildfire and evacuation-related risks. The Evacuation Travel Time Analysis modeled a worst-case evacuation scenario under “Existing without Project,” “Existing with Cinema,” and “With Project” conditions. As shown in Draft EIR Table 4.9-1, the modeled evacuation travel time for the Deer Canyon Park Preserve neighborhood increases by approximately 14 minutes with the Project, compared to existing conditions. This is a 7-minute increase compared to the Project site’s former use as a cinema.
The analysis concludes that this increase would not substantially impair the ability of residents to evacuate in the event of an emergency.
In addition, the Project includes multiple design features and regulatory compliance measures that further reduce potential risk. Project Design Feature (PDF) HAZ-1 requires the preparation and implementation of a Construction Fire Prevention Plan, which must be reviewed and approved by Anaheim Fire & Rescue prior to construction. PDF HAZ-2 requires a Wildfire Evacuation and Awareness Plan to be implemented prior to occupancy. This plan includes tenant-facing evacuation guidance, public alert systems (such as a PA system or emergency texting service), and annual emergency drills. These proactive features exceed what is typically required under CEQA and serve to enhance emergency preparedness at the Project site.
Finally, Mitigation Measure (MM) HAZ-1 requires the preparation of a Construction Management Plan that ensures emergency vehicle access and fire lane clearance during all phases of construction. This plan must be reviewed and approved by Anaheim Fire & Rescue prior to the commencement of construction.
Together, these measures demonstrate that the Project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fire beyond existing conditions, nor would it impair implementation of the City’s Emergency Operations Plan, Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (“Be Ready Anaheim Hills Festival Specific Plan Amendment Project Section 2.0 Final Environmental Impact Report Response to Comments
City of Anaheim 23
Anaheim”), or Know Your Way initiative. The Draft EIR concludes that wildfire impacts would be less than significant with mitigation, and this conclusion is supported by substantial evidence.
Because the comment does not present new information or identify a CEQA deficiency, no revisions to the Draft EIR are required.
Comment Letter C2 – Shelley Shuff, June 28, 2025
Response C2-1
The commenter expresses opposition to the Project and raises concerns regarding emergency evacuation.
The commenter describes personal evacuation challenges experienced during a past wildfire event and expresses concern about the ability of elderly and disabled residents to safely evacuate in future emergencies. The commenter urges the City to protect the safety of existing residents by not approving the Project. The comment regarding evacuation concerns is acknowledged. However, this comment does not address the Draft EIR’s adequacy or raise a significant environmental issue. As such, no further response is necessary. Notwithstanding, the Draft EIR does consider the Project’s effect on evacuation; see Response C1-1 above.
Comment Letter C3 – Grace McGee, July 14, 2025
Response C3-1
The commenter expresses concern that the Project would exacerbate existing fire evacuation constraints in Anaheim Hills, an area designated as VHFHSZ. They state that evacuation from Weir Canyon to Imperial Highway already takes over three hours, the City’s “Know Your Way” plan does not substantially improve evacuation times, and the addition of over 1,000 vehicles from the Project would increase risks to residents, schoolchildren, and public safety. The commenter requests that the City not approve additional housing in this area due to the potential to endanger tens of thousands of lives. The comment regarding evacuation concerns is acknowledged. However, this comment does not address the Draft EIR’s adequacy or raise a significant environmental issue. As such, no further response is necessary. Notwithstanding, the Draft EIR does consider the Project’s effect on evacuation; see Response C1-1 above.
Comment Letter C4 – Joy Pickett, July 3, 2025
Response C4-1
The City acknowledges the commenter’s opposition to the Project and appreciates their participation in the CEQA process. The comment raises general concerns about traffic congestion on Santa Ana Canyon Road and evacuation during emergencies, and references a prior project (SALT). However, the comment does not identify a specific deficiency in the Draft EIR or present new information that would alter the environmental conclusions reached.
As discussed in Section 4.14, Transportation, and Section 4.9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, of the Draft EIR, the Project’s potential impacts on traffic operations and emergency evacuation were evaluated based on site-specific and project-specific data. The analyses concluded that with implementation of identified mitigation measures, the Project would not result in significant transportation or evacuationrelated impacts under CEQA. Accordingly, no revisions to the Draft EIR are required in response to this comment.
Anaheim Hills Festival Specific Plan Amendment Project Section 2.0 Final Environmental Impact Report Response to Comments
City of Anaheim 24
Comment Letter C5 – Marcia Anderson, July 29, 2025
Response C5-1
The commenter expresses concern about the number of apartment units proposed in the Project and the potential impact on wildfire evacuation in a high fire hazard area with limited access points. The commenter requests further study and consideration of reducing the number of apartments or pursuing an alternative use for the site.
The City acknowledges the commenter’s concerns regarding wildfire risk, emergency access, and the proposed number of apartment units. The comment does not identify a specific deficiency in the Draft EIR or present new information requiring further analysis. Wildfire-related impacts, including emergency evacuation in a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, are addressed in Section 4.9 of the Draft EIR and Appendix 4.9-2. The analysis concludes impacts would be less than significant with mitigation. No revisions to the Draft EIR are required.
Comment Letter C6 – Allison Valdivia, July 30, 2025
Response C6-1
The commenter opposes the Project due to concerns that existing evacuation routes are inadequate for current residents. The commenter describes personal experience during the 2017 wildfire evacuation and asserts that no additional development should be approved until more evacuation routes are created.
The City acknowledges the commenter’s concerns. The comment expresses general opposition and references past evacuation challenges but does not identify a specific deficiency in the Draft EIR or present new information requiring further analysis under CEQA. Wildfire evacuation impacts are addressed in Section 4.9 of the Draft EIR and Appendix 4.9-2. The analysis concludes that impacts would be less than significant with mitigation. No revisions to the Draft EIR are required.
Comment Letter C7 - Betty and Dana Farnsworth, July 30, 2025 Response C7-1
The commenter expresses opposition to the proposed apartment project at the Festival Center, citing concerns about emergency evacuation during wildfires. The commenter states that evacuation during the last fire event took over three hours to travel just three miles, and believes additional housing should not be approved until infrastructure improvements are made. The commenter specifically requests that the Fairmont overpass be completed before considering any new development along Santa Ana Canyon Road.
The comment emphasizes that evacuation safety and lives are at risk. The commenter also asks to be notified of future meetings or updates regarding the project.
The City acknowledges the commenter’s concerns. The comment expresses general opposition and references past evacuation challenges but does not identify a specific deficiency in the Draft EIR or present new information requiring further analysis under CEQA. Wildfire evacuation impacts are addressed in Section 4.9 of the Draft EIR and Appendix 4.9-2. The analysis concludes that impacts would be less than significant with mitigation. No revisions to the Draft EIR are required.
Comment Letter C8 – Evalina Loyo, July 30, 2025
Response C8-1
The commenter opposes the Project and raises concerns about impacts to infrastructure, public safety, and quality of life. The commenter notes that local streets and the 91 Freeway are already heavily Anaheim Hills Festival Specific Plan Amendment Project Section 2.0 Final Environmental Impact Report Response to Comments
City of Anaheim 25
congested, particularly during peak hours, and that the area lies within a high fire hazard zone with limited and inefficient evacuation routes. The commenter shares firsthand experience of delays during past wildfire evacuations and warns that adding hundreds of new residents could further compromise public safety and emergency response. While acknowledging the need for housing, the commenter urges the City to reconsider the location and scale of the project given these challenges and expresses interest in participating in future community hearings.
The City acknowledges the commenter’s concerns. The comment expresses general opposition and references past evacuation challenges but does not identify a specific deficiency in the Draft EIR or present new information requiring further analysis under CEQA. Wildfire evacuation impacts are addressed in Section 4.9 of the Draft EIR and Appendix 4.9-2. Traffic impacts are addressed in Section 4.17. The analysis concludes that impacts would be less than significant with mitigation. No revisions to the Draft EIR are required.
Comment Letter C9 – Joy Pickett, August 1, 2025
Response C9-1
The commenter opposes the Project and raises concerns regarding traffic, emergency evacuation, school capacity, and noise. The commenter also references the rejection of the Deer Canyon project down the road. The City acknowledges the commenter’s opposition and concerns. However, the comment does not identify a specific deficiency in the Draft EIR or present new information that would require additional analysis under CEQA. Emergency evacuation and wildfire risk are addressed in Section 4.9, with supporting analysis in the Evacuation Travel Time Analysis (Appendix 4.9-2 of the Draft EIR). Traffic impacts are addressed in Section 4.17, school services in Section 4.15, and noise impacts in Section 4.11. The Draft EIR concludes that impacts in these areas would be less than significant with mitigation, where applicable. No revisions to the Draft EIR are required in response to this comment.
Anaheim Hills Festival Specific Plan Amendment Project Section 2.0 Final Environmental Impact Report Response to Comments
City of Anaheim 26
2.4 Responses to Planning Commission Workshop Comments
Verbal Comment D1 – John M.
Response D1
The commenter stated that he lives less than a mile from the proposed development and watched the City Council vote against the Salt project, which raised two key concerns. He referenced a previous speaker’s use of the medical principle “do no harm” and emphasized that the area is a very high-risk fire zone. He expressed concern that adding 1,000 more vehicles and residents would worsen an already difficult evacuation situation, referencing a past fire in Pacific Palisades and delays on Santa Ana Canyon Road. He shared that his homeowner’s insurance was not renewed due to fire risk, and he was denied by four other companies before obtaining a more expensive policy. He stated the area is not appropriate for apartments and recalled that the evacuation took two hours in 2017. He criticized the Project as “adding fuel to the fire” and referenced a comment from a general plan contributor who said allowing the SALT project would effectively discard the General Plan. He expressed concern that the developer is planning to convert the area to apartments incrementally and stated the best option would be to keep the site asis or rezone it for commercial use, preserving the movie theater.
This comment is acknowledged. An Evacuation Travel Time Analysis report was prepared for the Project, which was incorporated into the Draft EIR to assess the Project’s impacts on evacuation timing. The Evacuation Travel Time Analysis report was provided as Appendix 4.9-2 to the Draft EIR. As discussed in greater detail in Section 4.9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, of the Draft EIR, although the project would result in additional congestion that would result in a potential extension of time to evacuate (by approximately 14 minutes), given the Project’s numerous design features that enhance wildfire resilience and facilitate emergency access, combined with adherence to all applicable laws and regulations as well as local policies and programs and implementation of MM HAZ-1, the Project would not impair implementation of or physically interfere with the City’s Emergency Operation Plan, Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (“Be Ready Anaheim” plan) or its Know Your Way initiative, nor would the Project expose people or structures, with directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires beyond existing conditions. Given that this comment does not raise any new information that was not addressed in the Draft EIR, no further response is necessary.
Verbal Comment D2 – Jimmy A (Western States Regional Council of Carpenters) Response D2
The commenter, speaking on behalf of the Western States Regional Council of Carpenters, expressed concern about the Project based on Shea Homes’ past use of contractors alleged to engage in unfair labor practices. These concerns include non-payment of livable wages, worker misclassification, and failure to pay workers. The commenter does not oppose housing development generally but urges the City not to approve the Project unless Shea Homes commits to using law-abiding contractors that treat workers fairly.
The City acknowledges the commenter’s concerns regarding labor practices. However, CEQA is limited to evaluating a project’s potential to result in physical environmental impacts. Labor issues, including wage practices and contractor selection, are not within the scope of CEQA review unless they result in a reasonably foreseeable physical environmental impact, which the comment does not identify. While the City encourages all developers to comply with applicable labor laws and promote fair employment Anaheim Hills Festival Specific Plan Amendment Project Section 2.0 Final Environmental Impact Report Response to Comments
City of Anaheim 27
practices, this comment does not raise a CEQA issue requiring further environmental analysis or revisions to the EIR.
Verbal Comment D3 – Betty F.
Response D3
The commenter thanked City staff for their efforts and expressed concern about the Project. She questioned the need for 377 apartments and identified wildfire evacuation and transportation as major issues. She cited past evacuation delays on Santa Ana Canyon Road and congestion on the 91 Freeway, and stated that additional vehicles would worsen conditions. She indicated a preference for Option 2, which would redevelop the theater into a home improvement store with different traffic patterns. She noted that the wildfire consultant challenged previous Salt project assumptions and commended that analysis. She also raised concerns about VMT and reduced parking, stating that such reductions could result in spillover parking in surrounding neighborhoods. She supported the idea of “do no harm” and referenced past fire disasters.
This comment is acknowledged. Please refer to Response D1 for wildfire evacuation discussion.
Transportation and VMT impacts are addressed in Section 4.17 of the Draft EIR. The Project includes reduced parking (PDF TRANS-2) and moderate-income housing (PDF TRANS-1) as VMT-reduction strategies consistent with CAPCOA guidance. These features would not result in significant impacts under CEQA. The commenter’s preference for Alternative 2 is noted. As no new information or substantial evidence was presented that would alter the conclusions of the Draft EIR, no further response is required.
Verbal Comment D4 – Mark H.
Response D4
The commenter questioned who prepared the environmental document for the Project—whether it was completed by City staff or a consultant, and who paid for it. He expressed support for the inclusion of affordable housing but questioned whether any units would serve lower-income categories. He stated that Anaheim is behind on its RHNA targets. He disagreed with the wildfire risk characterization and stated that, based on his experience, the greatest fire danger comes from east-to-west Santa Ana winds. He also suggested that developers should contribute to infrastructure improvements, such as a bridge over Fairmont. Finally, he raised concerns about the timing and transparency of overriding considerations in City decision-making, referencing past experience with the Disney Forward project.
This comment is acknowledged. Kimley-Horn, a consulting firm under contract to the Property Owner/Developer, prepared the Draft EIR. Kimley-Horn is also on the City of Anaheim’s On-Call Environmental Consultant list as a pre-qualified CEQA consultant. The City retained full control and independent judgment over the document’s content, consistent with State CEQA Guidelines §15084. To ensure objectivity and technical adequacy, the City retained Psomas to peer review the Draft EIR and the Project’s technical studies on behalf of the City as Lead Agency. The Project includes 45 moderate-income units, which satisfy the City’s inclusionary housing requirements but do not include very low- or lowincome units. Deeper affordability levels are not required under CEQA. Wildfire evacuation was evaluated in Section 4.9 of the Draft EIR, supported by the Evacuation Travel Time Analysis (Appendix 4.9-2 of the Draft EIR). The analysis modeled two worst-case fire scenarios in Deer Canyon Park under northeast and south-southwest wind conditions. In both scenarios, fire progression was forecast to reach the Project vicinity after 2 to 3 hours, providing a conservative basis for evacuation modeling. The commenter Anaheim Hills Festival Specific Plan Amendment Project Section 2.0 Final Environmental Impact Report Response to Comments
City of Anaheim 28
provides no evidence that the modeling or scenarios are inaccurate. Developer funding of off-site infrastructure, such as the Fairmont bridge, is beyond the scope of CEQA unless necessary to mitigate a significant environmental impact. No such impact was identified. No further response is required.
Verbal Comment D5 – Mr. Hill
Response D5
The commenter expresses concern regarding wildfire evacuation and the adequacy of emergency access, citing the lack of alternate evacuation routes and referencing past fire disasters. As discussed in Section
4.9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, of the Draft EIR, and the supporting Evacuation Travel Time Analysis (Appendix 4.9-2 of the Draft EIR), the Project would not significantly impair emergency evacuation. Modeled worst-case fire scenarios indicate that fire progression toward the site would take 2–3 hours, during which evacuation would remain feasible. The Project includes design features and MM HAZ-1 to ensure compliance with applicable fire safety standards and coordination with emergency services. CEQA does not require off-site improvements, such as a new overpass, unless necessary to reduce significant physical impacts. Because evacuation impacts are less than significant with mitigation, no additional improvements are required. No new information has been presented; therefore, no changes to the Draft EIR are necessary.
Anaheim Hills Festival Specific Plan Amendment Project Section 3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report Clarifications and Revisions City of Anaheim 29
3.0 CLARIFICATIONS AND REVISIONS
This section presents revisions to the Draft EIR text, tables, and figures that were generated in response to agency comments. These revisions are intended solely to clarify, correct, or amplify information in the Draft EIR based on the comments received during the public review period. None of the revisions alter the Draft EIR’s methodology, analysis, or conclusions.
Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines §15088.5(a), recirculation of a Draft EIR is required when “significant new information” is added after public notice of availability but before certification. Significant new information includes, but is not limited to, disclosure of a new or substantially more severe impact, the identification of a feasible project alternative or mitigation measure considerable different from those previously analyzed, or substantial changes to the proposed mitigation measures.
None of the comments, responses, or revisions to the Draft EIR constitutes “significant new information” as defined in State CEQA Guidelines §15088.5(a). The revisions do not change the Draft EIR in a way that would deprive the public of a meaningful opportunity to comment on a substantial adverse environmental effect of the Project or on a feasible way to mitigate or avoid such an effect (including a feasible alternative) that the Project’s proponents have declined to adopt. Instead, the revisions clarify or supplement information already provided, or make only insignificant modifications to an otherwise adequate Draft EIR.
Accordingly, recirculation of the Draft EIR is not required. The EIR revisions presented in the following pages are organized in the same order as the corresponding information in the Draft EIR. Revisions in text are identified by strikeouts for deleted text and double underlined for added text. Page references to the Draft EIR are provided for ease of review.
Anaheim Hills Festival Specific Plan Amendment Project Section 3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report Clarifications and Revisions City of Anaheim 30
Draft EIR
Page
Number
Section Revision or Clarification
2-5 2.6, Project
Characteristics
In addition, a zoning code the Specific Plan Amendment would update to Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.108, Festival Specific Plan, would be required to incorporate the proposed residential standards into DA 5 and other clarifying changes referenced above in relation to signage, permitted uses, and development standards.
Appendix
4.17-2, vii
AUGUST 11,
2025
REVISIONS
AUGUST 11, 2025 REVISIONS
The revisions included on August 11, 2025, were prepared in response to the California Department
of Transportation (Caltrans) comment letter dated August 4, 2025.
Specifically, these revisions include
the following:
• Revisions to Table 4-1 to include the Shopping Center trip generation rates.
• All Turning Volume exhibits updated to ensure volumes are only displayed for applicable turning
• movements at each location.
• • Typographical error in all Queuing tables updated to correctly reference SR-91 Freeway.
Appendix
4.17-2,
page 33
Section 4
Projected
Future Traffic
Land Use1
ITE
LU
Code
Units2
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily
In Out Total In Out Total
Multifamily
(Mid-Rise)
Residential
221 DU 0.09 0.28 0.37 0.24 0.15 0.39 4.54
Shopping
Center
>150,000 SF
820 TSF 0.52 0.32 0.84 1.63 1.77 3.40 37.01
1 Trip Generation Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation Manual, Eleventh Edition (2021)
2 DU = Dwelling Units; TSF = Thousand Square Feet
Appendix
4.17-2,
page 37
Section 4
Projected
Future Traffic
Exhibit 4-2: Project Only Traffic Volumes was updated to remove the northbound left and southbound left turn movements (which showed 0 volumes) for Intersection Nos. 1, 2, 13, and 14.
Appendix
4.17-2,
page 41
Section 4
Projected
Future Traffic
Exhibit 4-4: Cumulative Only Traffic Volumes was updated to remove the northbound left and southbound left turn movements (which showed 0 volumes) for Intersection Nos. 1, 2, 13, and 14.
Appendix
4.17-2,
page 44
Section 5
Opening Year
(2029) Traffic
Conditions
Exhibit 5-2: E+A+A (2029) Traffic Volumes was updated to remove the northbound left and southbound left turn movements (which showed 0 volumes) for Intersection Nos. 1, 2, 13, and 14.
Appendix
4.17-2,
page 45
Section 5
Opening Year
(2029) Traffic
Conditions
Exhibit 5-2: E+A+A+P (2029) Traffic Volumes was updated to remove the northbound left and southbound left turn movements (which showed 0 volumes) for Intersection Nos. 1, 2, 13, and 14.
Anaheim Hills Festival Specific Plan Amendment Project Section 3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report Clarifications and Revisions City of Anaheim 31
Appendix
4.17-2,
page 54
Section 6
General Plan
Buildout
Traffic
Conditions
Exhibit 6-1: General Plan Buildout Without Project Traffic Volumes was updated to remove the northbound left and southbound left turn movements (which showed 0 volumes) for Intersection Nos. 1, 2, 13, and 14.
Appendix
4.17-2,
page 55
Section 6
General Plan
Buildout
Traffic
Conditions
Exhibit 6-2: General Plan Buildout With Project Traffic Volumes was updated to remove the northbound left and southbound left turn movements (which showed 0 volumes) for Intersection Nos. 1, 2, 13, and 14.
Appendix
4.17-1,
page 1
AUGUST 7,
2025
REVISIONS
AUGUST 7, 2025 REVISIONS
The revisions included on August 7, 2025, were prepared in response to the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) comment letter dated August 4, 2025. These revisions consist of typographical edits and clarifications to the sections titled Orange County Baseline VMT per SP and Project Design Features – VMT Reductions; T1 – Increase Residential Density.
Appendix
4.17-1,
page 3
Orange
County
Baseline VMT
per SP
The Orange County baseline VMT per SP value has been calculated using OCTAM 5.0. Base year and cumulative year results were used to calculate the baseline condition using straight line linear interpolation.
Table 2 presents the resulting Orange County baseline VMT per SP value of 25.7. Based on this, 15% below the Orange County baseline VMT per SP is 21.9.
Appendix
4.17-1,
page 4
Orange
County
Baseline VMT
per SP
TABLE 2: ORAN GE COUN TY VM T PER SERVICE POPULATION
Baseline1
SP 5,726,964
VMT 147,242,547
VMT per SP 25.7
City Threshold 21.9 1
Baseline refers to OCTAM base year 2016.
1 Baseline refers to OCTAM base year 2016 (City
Guidelines; Page 8)
Appendix
4.17-1,
page 6
Locational
Context
Attachment B provides a matrix of VMT mitigation reduction measures available to an urban residential project.
Appendix
4.17-1,
page 6
Project Design
Features –
VMT
Reductions
This measure accounts for the VMT reduction achieved by a project that is designed with a higher density of dwelling units compared to the average residential density in the U.S. (9.1 DU/AC). Increased densities affect the distance people travel and provide greater options for the mode of travel they choose. Increasing residential density results in shorter and fewer trips by single-occupancy vehicles and thus a reduction in VMT.
As the land use information and densities ranging from 15.0 to 28.0 DU/AC that represents the Project was input into the OCTAM, any increased density over the National average that would reduce VMT is Anaheim Hills Festival Specific Plan Amendment Project Section 3.0 Final Environmental Impact Report Clarifications and Revisions City of Anaheim 32
included in the VMT estimates in Table 4 and no additional VMT reduction credit is assumed to avoid double-counting.
Appendix
4.17-1,
Attachment
B
CAPCOA VMT
Reduction
Measures
Not Applicable in at the Project level.
Note that this typo was corrected throughout Attachment B.
Appendix
4.17-1,
Attachment
B
CAPCOA VMT
Reduction
Measures
(T-4)
Not Applicable, all units proposed are at market rate. Applicable.
Appendix
4.17-1,
Attachment
B
CAPCOA VMT
Reduction
Measures
(T-20)
T-20 Expend Expand Bikeway Network
APPENDIX A
WRITTEN COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT EIR
From: Sahar Ghadimi <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 1, 2025 10:51 AM
To: Amanda Lauffer
Cc: Sam Wang; Danica Nguyen
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Technical data request for the Festival Anaheim Hills Project.
Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message.
Dear Amanda Lauffer,
South Coast AQMD staff received the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Festival Anaheim Hills Project (South Coast AQMD Control Number: ORC250624-04). Staff is currently in the process of reviewing the Draft EIR.
Could you please provide an electronic copy of any live modeling and emission calculation files (complete data files, not summaries) that were used to quantify the air quality impacts from construction and/or operation of the Proposed Project as applicable, including the following:
• CalEEMod Input Files (.csv and .json files);
• Live EMFAC output files;
• Any emission calculation file(s) (live version of excel file(s); no PDF) used to calculate the Project’s emission sources (i.e. truck operations);
• AERMOD Input and Output files, including AERMOD View file(s) (.isc); • HARP Input and Output files and/or cancer risk calculation files (live version of excel file(s); no PDF) used to calculate cancer risk, and chronic and acute hazards from the Project; • Any other files related to post-processing done outside of AERMOD to calculate pollutantspecific concentrations (if applicable).
We would appreciate you sending the above-mentioned files via a Dropbox link in which they may be accessed and downloaded by South Coast AQMD staff by middle of next week. Without all files and supporting documentation, South Coast AQMD staff will be unable to complete a review of the air quality analyses in a timely manner and will require additional time for review beyond the end of the comment period.
Thanks you for your assistance and consideration.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please feel free to contact me.
Kind regards,
Sahar Ghadimi
Air Quality Specialist, CEQA IGR
Planning, Rule Development & Implementation
South Coast Air Quality Management District
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important A1-1
1 I
21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765
(909) 396-2392
[email protected]
2 From: Sahar Ghadimi <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 1, 2025 3:22 PM
To: Amanda Lauffer
Cc: Sam Wang
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Comment letter for the Festival Anaheim Hills Project.
Attachments: ORC250624-04 DEIR Festival Anaheim Hills Project.pdf Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message.
Dear Amanda Lauffer,
Attached are South Coast AQMD staff’s comments on Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) for the Festival Anaheim Hills Project (South Coast AQMD Control Number: ORC250624-04).
Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these comments and confirm that you have receive the letter.
Regards,
Sahar Ghadimi, Ph.D.
Air Quality Specialist, CEQA IGR
Planning, Rule Development & Implementation
South Coast Air Quality Management District
21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765
(909) 396-2392
[email protected]
A2-1
3 SENT VIA E-MAIL: August 1, 2025
[email protected]
Amanda Lauffer, Senior Planner
City of Anaheim, Planning and Building Department
200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, Suite 162
Anaheim, CA 92805
Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) for the
Festival Anaheim Hills Project (Proposed Project)
(SCH No: 2024010859)
South Coast Air Quality Management District (South Coast AQMD) staff appreciate the opportunity to review the above-mentioned document. The City of Anaheim is the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Lead Agency for the Proposed Project. To provide context, South Coast AQMD staff has provided a brief summary of the project information and prepared the following comments which are organized by topic of concern.
Summary of Proposed Project Information in the DEIR
Based on the DEIR, the Proposed Project consists of: 1) a new 16.5-acre Development Area (DA5) within the existing boundaries of the Anaheim Hills Festival Specific Plan to accommodate residential uses in combination with the sites existing commercial development.
General Plan Amendment Specific Plan Amendment, and a Zoning code Amendment to incorporate the proposed residential standards into DA5; 2) demolishing a 62.676 square foot theater and constructing 447 residential units.1 Project construction is conservatively estimated in this EIR to commence in September 2026 and conclude by December 2029.2 The project is located at the southeast corner of East Santa Ana Canyon Road and South Festival Drive, Anaheim.3 Based on staff review of the aerial imagery, the nearest residential sensitive receptor is located directly adjacent to the south west and west of the Project site.
South Coast AQMD Comments
Insufficient Consideration of Operational Air Quality Impacts in the DEIR: Need for Operational HRA and LST Evaluations
The DEIR omits an operational health risk assessment (HRA) and localized significance analysis for operational emissions, based on the assumption that the project lacks stationary sources or prolonged idling activity. However, this conclusion is not adequately supported. Regardless of whether the project is primarily residential, it may still generate operational emissions from mobile sources such as residential traffic, delivery and service vehicles, waste collection, and 1 DEIR. Page 8.
2 Ibid. Page 58.
3 Ibid. Page 47.
A2-2
A2-3
4 J1it1 South Coast ~ Air Quality Management District
mJm 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 9 1 765-4 I 78
r.l.!ltLl!J (909) 396-2000 , www.aqmd.gov
Amanda Lauffer, Senior Planner 2 August 1, 2025
landscape maintenance equipment. Additionally, commercial components of the project may contribute to recurring on-site mobile activity and idling.
Based on South Coast AQMD guidance, the toxic air contaminants (TACs), especially diesel particulate matter (DPM) from operational mobile sources should be evaluated when sensitive receptors are located nearby.4In this case, sensitive receptors include the adjacent residential uses, and additional nearby receptors include the St. Jude Heritage Medical Group – Anaheim Hills, a medical clinic that serves vulnerable populations. Given the proximity of these receptors, an operational HRA and operational localized significance analysis for criteria pollutants should be conducted to evaluate the project’s health risk and air quality impacts on surrounding land uses. This is consistent with CEQA's requirement to disclose and mitigate significant environmental impacts the project may cause to the surrounding community.
Emission Reductions from Health Risk Strategies
South Coast AQMD is concerned about the potential public health impacts of siting existing and new sensitive populations within the proximity of existing air pollution sources (e.g., freeway, railroad). For this reason, prior to approving this Proposed Project as well as any future development projects, the Lead Agency is recommended to consider the impacts of air pollutants on people who will live in the new project area and provide effective mitigation. Additionally, South Coast AQMD suggests that the Lead Agency review and apply the guidance provided in:
1) the California Air Resources Board (CARB) Air Quality Land Use and Handbook: A Community Health Perspective5 which provides criteria for evaluating and reducing air pollution impacts associated with new projects involving land use decisions; and 2) CARB’s technical advisory which contains strategies to reduce air pollution exposure near high-volume roadways.6 Many strategies are available for residential receptors to reduce being exposed to particulate matter, including, but not limited to, HVAC systems equipped with filters rated at a minimum efficiency reporting value (MERV) 13 or higher air filtration capabilities. In some cases, MERV 15 or better is recommended, for building design, orientation, location, vegetation barriers, landscaping screening, etc. Enhanced filtration units are capable of reducing exposure. However, enhanced filtration systems have limitations. For example, filters rated MERV 13 or higher are able to screen out greater than or equal to 50% of DPM7but they have no ability to filter out volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions. Also, in a study that South Coast AQMD conducted to investigate filters rated at MERV 13 or better in classrooms,89a cost burden is expected to be within the range of $120 to $240 per year to replace each filter panel. The initial 4 South Coast AQMD HRA guidance for TACS: https://www.aqmd.gov/home/rules-compliance/ceqa/air-qualityanalysis-handbook/mobile-source-toxics-analysis?utm_source=chatgpt.com 5 California Air Resources Board (CARB), Air Quality Land Use and Handbook: A Community Health Perspective, April 2005. Available at: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2023-05/Land%20Use%20Handbook_0.pdf 6 CARB’s Strategies to Reduce Air Pollution Exposure Near High-Volume Roadways. Available at:
https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2017-10/rd_technical_advisory_final.pdf 7 U.S. EPA, “What is a MERV rating?” Available at: https://www.https://www.epa.gov/indoor-air-quality-iaq/whatmerv-rating. 8 South Coast AQMD, Draft Pilot Study of High-Performance Air Filtration For Classroom Applications, October 2009. Available at: https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/aqmdpilotstudyfinalreport.pdf. 9 South Coast AQMD, Draft Pilot Study of High-Performance Air Filtration For Classroom Applications, October 2009. Available at: https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/aqmdpilotstudyfinalreport.pdf.
A2-3
cont.
A2-4
5 Amanda Lauffer, Senior Planner 3 August 1, 2025
start-up cost could substantially increase if an HVAC system needs to be installed and if standalone filter units are required. Installation costs may vary, including costs for conducting site assessments and obtaining permits and approvals before filters can be installed. Other costs may include filter life monitoring, annual maintenance, and training for conducting maintenance and reporting. In addition, the filters would not have any effect unless the HVAC system is running. Therefore, when in use, the increased energy consumption from each HVAC system should be evaluated in the Draft EIR. While the filters operate 100 percent of the time when the HVAC is in use while the residents are indoors, the environmental analysis does not generally account for the times when the residents are not using their HVAC and instead have their windows or doors open or are moving throughout the common space outdoor areas of the Proposed Project. Furthermore, when used filters are replaced with new filters, emissions associated with trucks delivering the new filters and waste disposal trucks transporting the used filters to disposal sites should be evaluated in the Draft EIR. Therefore, any presumed effectiveness and feasibility of a particular HVAC filter should be carefully evaluated in more detail based on supporting evidence before assuming they will sufficiently alleviate exposure to DPM emissions.
Conclusion
As set forth in California Public Resources Code Section 21092.5(a) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15088(a-b), the Lead Agency shall evaluate comments from public agencies on the environmental issues and prepare a written response at least 10 days prior to certifying the Final EIR. As such, please provide South Coast AQMD written responses to all comments contained herein at least 10 days prior to the certification of the Final EIR. In addition, as provided by CEQA Guidelines Section 15088(c)if the Lead Agency’s position is at variance with recommendations provided in this comment letter, detailed reasons supported by substantial evidence in the record to explain why specific comments and suggestions are not accepted must be provided.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments. South Coast AQMD staff is available to work with the Lead Agency to address any air quality questions that may arise from this comment letter. Please contact Sahar Ghadimi, Air Quality Specialist, at [email protected] should you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Sam Wang
Sam Wang
Program Supervisor, CEQA IGR
Planning, Rule Development & Implementation
ORC250624-04
SW:SG
Control Number
A2-4
cont.
A2-5
6 Improving lives and communities through transportation.
DISTRICT 12
1750 East 4th Street, Suite 100 | SANTA ANA, CA 92705
(657) 328-6000 | FAX (657) 328-6522 TTY 711
https://dot.ca.gov/caltrans-near-me/district-12
August 4, 2025
Ms. Amanda Lauffer File: LDR/CEQA
Associate Planner SCH: 2024010859
City of Anaheim 12-ORA-2025-02855
200 S. Anaheim Blvd. SR-91; PM R14.055R
Suite 162
Anaheim, CA. 92805
Dear Ms. Lauffer,
Thank you for including the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) in the review of a Notice of Preparation (NOP) for a Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) for Project. The project site's
proposed development area falls within the newly created DA 5 for Mixed-Use purposes. DA 5 is estimated at 16.2 acres, resulting In DA 2 to be reduced from 48 acres to 31.8 acres in size. The development area is limited to DA 5, which includes the following APNs: 354-451-19 and -32. The exterior boundaries of the Specific Plan area would not change. The proposed development would demolish the existing ·approximately 62,676 square foot theater and, in its place, allow for the development of a 447-unit multi-family rental residential community. Of the existing theater's square footage, approximately 13,310 square feet of commercial use will be retained In DA 2 for future development. The existing retail within DA 5 includes the following uses that would remain as part of the proposed project: 6,475 square feet of restaurant, 9,200 square feet of office, 38,160 square feet of fitness/gym, 13,276 square feet of tutor/retail space, and 11,033 square feet of medical office building. Thus, the remaining commercial buildings would have a floor area ratio (FAR) of approximately 0.11, which is within the allowed FAR for DA S's proposed Mixed-Use Medium land use designation, which allows a FAR up to 0.35. The proposed multi-family rental residential community would consist of a four-story multi-family residential building wrapped around a five-level parking structure with one subterranean level. Project amenities would include a clubhouse, swimming pools, courtyards, a fitness center, a leasing/mail area, and common open space.
The proposed multi-family rental residential community would have four different unit types (1.e., studio, one-bedroom, two-bedroom, and three-bedroom) with private patio or balcony areas. All units would be single-story.
This document was created by an application that isn’t licensed to use novaPDF.
Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice.
A3-1
7 CALIFORNIA STATE TRANSPORTATION AGENCY GAVIN NEWSOM. GOVERNOR California Department of Transportation
the City of Anaheim's Festival Anaheim Hills
City of Anaheim
August 4, 2025
Improving lives and communities through transportation.
The Project site is located in the Anaheim Hills area of the City in Orange County (County). Regional access to the Project site is provided from State Route (SR) 91.
From SR-91, access to the Project site is provided via Weir Canyon Road. Local access to the Project site is provided via Santa Ana Canyon Road and South Festival Drive. Multiple driveways provide access to the Anaheim Hills Festival Shopping Center along both Santa Ana Canyon Road and South Festival Drive. The Project site is approximately 0.15 miles east of Deer Canyon Park Preserve and 0.35 miles south of the Santa Ana River.
This document was created by an application that isn’t licensed to use novaPDF.
Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice.
A3-1
A3-2
A3-3
A3-4
A3-5
A3-6
8 State Route 91 is owned and operated by Caltrans. Therefore, Caltrans is a commenting agency on this project, and has the following comments:
1. Caltrans recognizes there is a strong link between transportation and land use. Development can have a significant impact on traffic and congestion on State transportation facilities. In particular, the pattern of land use can affect both local vehicle miles traveled and the number of trips. Caltrans supports collaboration with local agencies to work towards a safe, functional, interconnected, multi-modal transportation network integrated through applicable "smart growth" type land use planning and policies. Additionally, Caltrans supports the City's progress in meeting its Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) allocation, and we encourage the City to promote the development of housing units for a variety of income levels.
2. Please encourage the use of transit among future residents, visitors, and workers of the proposed areas of developments. Increasing multimodal transportation will lead to a reduction to congestion, Vehicle Miles Traveled and improve air quality.
3. Caltrans encourages the design of Complete Streets that include high-quality pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities that are safe and comfortable for users of all ages and abilities. This may include safety measures such as physically separated sidewalks and bike lanes, pedestrian-oriented LED lighting, high-visibility continental crosswalk striping, raised crosswalks, refuge islands, wayfinding signage, and safe connections to existing and proposed bicycle facilities. Complete Streets improvements also promote regional connectivity, improve air quality, reduce congestion, promote improved first- /last-mile connections, and increase safety for all modes of transportation.
4. Caltrans supports the project's inclusion of secure and functional short- and long-term bike parking. Short-term bike parking should be placed on the ground floor in visible areas that are close to main entrances and should be installed at least 24" away from walls and other objects (e.g. trash cans, plants, etc.). Both short- and long-term bike parking should be designed to accommodate different types of bikes (e.g. cargo bike, bike with trailer). For City of Anaheim
August 4, 2025
Improving lives and communities through transportation.
This document was created by an application that isn’t licensed to use novaPDF.
Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice.
A3-6
A3-7
A3-8
A3-9
A3-10
A3-11
A3-12
A3-13
9 additional guidance on providing functional bike parking, see the attached "Essentials of Bike Parking" guidance created by the Association of https: //www .apbp.orq/Publications).
5. During construction, please ensure that appropriate detours and safety measures are in place that prioritize the mobility, access, and safety of bicyclists, pedestrians, and transit users. If adjacent sidewalks or bike lanes need to be closed during construction, please ensure that closures and detours are clearly signed. For bike lane closures, we recommend the use of "May Use Full Lane" (MUTCD R4-11) signage rather than "Share the Road" (Wl 6-1 P) signage to more clearly indicate to both drivers and bicyclists that bicyclists may ride in the center of the travel lane while the bike lane is closed.
6. Please describe how freight vehicles currently serve the retail center and how any expansion or redesign might affect truck turning movements or goods delivery logistics.
7. Please include a commercial truck circulation plan with emphasis on safe turning templates (e.g., WB-50), off-street loading zones, and avoiding conflicts with high pedestrian or parking areas. Confirm that updated driveway designs will support multi-modal and freight compatibility.
8. Please use the Caltrans Freight-Focused Land Use Compatibility Matrix to evaluate whether the modified land use mix may conflict with regional freight operations, particularly as it introduces new residential-serving or sensitive uses within a commercial freight-served zone.
9. Please add a policy consistency section assessing alignment with freight policies in SCA G's Goods Movement Appendix and Caltrans' freight strategies, especially where retail centers interface with regional highway corridors.
1 O. If future impact analysis leads to findings of significance on State facilities, please coordinate with Caltrans District 12 Local Development on development of a Traffic Mitigation Agreement or similar effort.
11. Any work performed within Caltrans right-of-way (R/W) will require discretionary review and approval by Caltrans and an encroachment permit will be required for any work within the Caltrans R/W prior to construction.
Prior to submitting to Caltrans Permit's branch, applicant should fill out Applicant's Checklist to Determine Applicable Review Process (QMAP List) Form TR-0416 to determine if project oversight/coordination with Caltrans City of Anaheim
August 4, 2025
Improving lives and communities through transportation.
This document was created by an application that isn’t licensed to use novaPDF.
Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice.
A3-13
A3-14
A3-15
A3-16
A3-17
A3-18
A3-19
10 Project Manager is needed. If coordination is not required, please submit an encroachment permit application package (EPAP) through the Caltrans Encroachment Permit System (CEPS - https://ceps.dot.ca.gov/). EPAP should include application, PE signed and stamped site-specific traffic control plan, insurance, letter of authorizations as needed, and any other relevant documents. EPAP should be submitted as early as possible to avoid any delays.
12. Project plans and traffic control plans must be stamped and signed by a licensed engineer. For all plans, including traffic control plans, Caltrans R/W lines should be clearly labeled, which includes existing and proposed (if there are any changes to Caltrans R/W), the north arrow, the edge of pavement, and edge of the sidewalk, if applicable. When submitting the application, please include final Environmental Clearance Documentation, relevant design details including design exception approvals and construction and drainage plans, traffic control plans, traffic management plan and traffic impact study if proposed traffic delay of 30 minutes above normal recurring traffic delay is anticipated, any Caltrans R/W certifications if needed, maintenance agreement as needed, shoring plans for any excavation 5-feet or more, ADA certification, and any letter of authorizations.
The following comments are specific to Appendix 4.1 7-2: Anaheim Hills Festival SPA NO. 6 Traffic Analysis (March 13, 2025):
13. Page 33, Table 4-1; Please show rates of the other uses for reference.
14. Traffic Movement/Volumes Exhibits - Please remove any movements that do not exist at the intersections (i.e., Intersection # 13, 14, etc.). It is difficult to differentiate between zero volumes from a movement that does not exist.
15. Page 34, Table 4-3: If Opening Year traffic is projected from existing volume that includes the vacant Cinema, then no trip credits should be taken again.
Please verify. It is a significant amount of trip credit taken during the PM and Daily.
16. Page 42, Section 4.7: Was there any vacancy of any existing project land uses during the Existing 2024 counts? No trip credits should be taken again.
Please verify. It is a significant amount of trip credit taken during the PM and Daily.
17. Peak Hour Queuing Summaries: Please revise "1-215" to "SR-91" in footnote 3.
Verify all tables.
City of Anaheim
August 4, 2025
Improving lives and communities through transportation. to improve lives and communities through transportation. Please continue to coordinate with Caltrans for any future developments that could potentially impact State transportation facilities. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Julie Lugaro at [email protected].
Sincerely,
Scott Shelley
Branch Chief,
Local Development Review-Climate Change-Transit Grants
Caltrans, District 12
This document was created by an application that isn’t licensed to use novaPDF.
Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice.
A3-20
A3-21
A3-22
A3-23
11 The following comments are specific to Appendix 4.17-1: ANAHEIM HILLS FESTIVAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 6 VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED (VMT) ANALYSIS (December 23, 2024)
18. If the Baseline data was taken from the OCT AM base year of 2016, then how were Base year and cumulative year results used to calculate the baseline condition using straight line linear interpolation? "Baseline" in Table 2 is 2016.
What year are Baseline/Cumulative scenarios in the other tables? Clarification needed.
19. Page 7- Provide source, date published, of the cited "Handbook" for reference.
20. Page 7 - T-1 Increase Residential Density Section - States, you can apply T-1 to reduce trips if "a Project has higher density of dwelling units compared to the average residential density in the US". What is the average residential density in the US? Provide a quantified comparison with this project's density of dwelling.
Caltrans' mission is
From: Chase Preciado <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2025 4:29 PM
To: Amanda Lauffer
Cc: Rebecca Davis; Leslie Reider; Emy Lipkind
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Comment Re: Festival Anaheim Hills Project (DEV2023-00043) Attachments: 2025.06.30 Comment - Festival Anaheim Hills Project - Anaheim - BD Final.pdf Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message.
Dear Ms. Lauffer,
Attached please find comments of Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility ("SAFER") regarding the Draft Environmental Impact Report (“DEIR”) prepared for the Festival Anaheim Hills Project (DEV2023-00043).
If you could please confirm receipt of this email and the attached comments, it would be much appreciated.
Have a wonderful day!
Sincerely,
Chase Preciado (He/Him)
Legal Assistant
Lozeau | Drury LLP
1939 Harrison Street, Suite 150
Oakland, CA 94612
(510) 836-4200
(510) 836-4205 (fax)
[email protected]
B1-1
12 Via Email
June 30, 2025
Amanda Lauffer, Senior Planner
Planning Services Division
Planning and Building Department
City of Anaheim
200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, 1st Floor
Anaheim, CA 92805
[email protected]
Re: Comment on Draft Environmental Impact Report, Festival Anaheim Hills Project (DEV2023-00043)
Dear Ms. Lauffer:
This comment is submitted on behalf of Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility (“SAFER”) regarding the Draft Environmental Impact Report (“DEIR”) prepared for the Festival Anaheim Hills Project (DEV2023-00043), which proposes the demolition of a 62,676 square-foot theatre to make way for the development of a 447-unit multi-family residential building with a five-level wraparound parking structure with one level of subterranean parking, located on an 85.7-acre project site located within the Anaheim Hills Festival Specific Plan in the City of Anaheim (“Project”).
SAFER is concerned that the DEIR fails as an informational document and fails to impose all feasible mitigation measures to reduce the Project’s impacts. SAFER requests that the Planning and Building Department address these shortcomings in a revised draft environmental impact report and recirculate it prior to considering approvals for the Project.
SAFER reserves the right to supplement these comments during the administrative process. Galante Vineyards v. Monterey Peninsula Water Management Dist., 60 Cal. App. 4th 1109, 1121 (1997).
Sincerely,
Rebecca Davis
Lozeau Drury LLP
B1-2
13 VIA E-MAIL
August 4, 2025
Amanda Lauffer, Senior Planner
Planning and Building Department
City of Anaheim
200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, Suite 162
Anaheim, CA 92805
Ph: (714) 765-4479
Em: [email protected]
RE: City of Anaheim’s Anaheim Hills Festival Specific Plan Amendment Project – Draft Environmental Impact Report (SCH# 2024010859)
Dear Amanda Lauffer,
On behalf of the Western States Regional Council of Carpenters (“Western Carpenters” or “WSRCC”), our firm is submitting these comments in connection with the City of Anaheim’s (“City”) Anaheim Hills Festival Specific Plan Amendment (“Project”) and the Draft Environmental Impact Report (“DEIR”) associated therewith.
The Notice of Availability of the Project’s DEIR describes the Project as follows:
The proposed project would establish a new Development Area (DA 5) within the existing boundaries of the Anaheim Hills Festival Specific Plan to accommodate residential uses in combination with the site's existing commercial development. DA 5 would be created by reallocating land from the existing DA 2, reducing its size from approximately 48 acres to
31.8 acres. The resulting 16.2-acre area would form the new DA 5. All proposed development would be confined to DA 5, which encompasses Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs) 354-451-19 and 354-451-32. The overall exterior boundary of the Specific Plan would remain unchanged.
The proposed project includes the demolition of an approximately 62,676- square-foot cinema within DA 5 and the development of a new 447-unit B2-1
14 multiple-family rental residential community. The proposed multiplefamily community would consist of a four-story residential building, wrapped around a five-level parking structure with one subterranean level.
All residential units are single-story and include one-bedroom, twobedroom, and three-bedroom options with private patios or balconies.
Project amenities include a clubhouse, two swimming pools, courtyards, a fitness center, leasing office, and mail area. In addition to the project amenities, the applicant is proposing an enclosed outdoor public dog park along Festival Drive and public bluff park along the edge of the newly proposed DA 5 and the lower tier of the shopping center, DA 2, which would be open to residents of the community and the general public.
NOA, p. 1.
The Western States Regional Council of Carpenters is a labor union representing almost 90,000 union carpenters in 12 states, including California, and has a strong interest in well-ordered land use planning and in addressing the environmental impacts of development projects.
Individual members of the Western Carpenters live, work, and recreate in the City and surrounding communities and would be directly affected by the Project’s environmental impacts.
The Western Carpenters expressly reserves the right to supplement these comments at or prior to hearings on the Project, and at any later hearing and proceeding related to this Project. Gov. Code, § 65009, subd. (b); Pub. Res. Code, § 21177, subd. (a); see Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. Bakersfield (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 1184, 1199- 1203; see also Galante Vineyards v. Monterey Water Dist. (1997) 60 Cal.App.4th 1109, 1121.
The Western Carpenters incorporates by reference all comments raising issues regarding the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) submitted prior to certification of the EIR for the Project. See Citizens for Clean Energy v City of Woodland (2014) 225 Cal.App.4th 173, 191 (finding that any party who has objected to the project’s environmental documentation may assert any issue timely raised by other parties).
Moreover, the Western Carpenters requests that the City provide notice for any and all notices referring or related to the Project issued under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Res. Code, § 21000 et seq.), and the B2-1
cont.
15 California Planning and Zoning Law (“Planning and Zoning Law”) (Gov. Code, §§ 65000–65010). California Public Resources Code Sections 21092.2, and 21167(f) and California Government Code Section 65092 require agencies to mail such notices to any person who has filed a written request for them with the clerk of the agency’s governing body.
I. THE CITY SHOULD REQUIRE THE USE OF A LOCAL
WORKFORCE TO BENEFIT THE COMMUNITY’S ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT
The City should require the Project to be built using a local workers who have graduated from a Joint Labor-Management Apprenticeship Program approved by the State of California, have at least as many hours of on-the-job experience in the applicable craft which would be required to graduate from such a state-approved apprenticeship training program, or who are registered apprentices in a state-approved apprenticeship training program.
Community benefits such as local hire can also be helpful to reduce environmental impacts and improve the positive economic impact of the Project. Local hire provisions requiring that a certain percentage of workers reside within 10 miles or less of the Project site can reduce the length of vendor trips, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and provide localized economic benefits. As environmental consultants Matt Hagemann and Paul E. Rosenfeld note:
[A]ny local hire requirement that results in a decreased worker trip length from the default value has the potential to result in a reduction of construction-related GHG emissions, though the significance of the reduction would vary based on the location and urbanization level of the project site.
March 8, 2021 SWAPE Letter to Mitchell M. Tsai re Local Hire Requirements and Considerations for Greenhouse Gas Modeling.
Workforce requirements promote the development of skilled trades that yield sustainable economic development. As the California Workforce Development Board and the University of California, Berkeley Center for Labor Research and Education concluded:
[L]abor should be considered an investment rather than a cost—and investments in growing, diversifying, and upskilling California’s workforce B2-1
cont.
B2-2
B2- text
16 can positively affect returns on climate mitigation efforts. In other words, well-trained workers are key to delivering emissions reductions and moving California closer to its climate targets.1
Furthermore, workforce policies have significant environmental benefits given that they improve an area’s jobs-housing balance, decreasing the amount and length of job commutes and the associated greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In fact, on May 7, 2021, the South Coast Air Quality Management District found that that the “[u]se of a local state-certified apprenticeship program” can result in air pollutant reductions.2
Locating jobs closer to residential areas can have significant environmental benefits.
As the California Planning Roundtable noted in 2008:
People who live and work in the same jurisdiction would be more likely to take transit, walk, or bicycle to work than residents of less balanced communities and their vehicle trips would be shorter. Benefits would include potential reductions in both vehicle miles traveled and vehicle hours traveled.3
Moreover, local hire mandates and skill-training are critical facets of a strategy to reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT). As planning experts Robert Cervero and Michael Duncan have noted, simply placing jobs near housing stock is insufficient to achieve VMT reductions given that the skill requirements of available local jobs must match those held by local residents.4 Some municipalities have even tied local hire and 1 California Workforce Development Board (2020) Putting California on the High Road: A Jobs and Climate Action Plan for 2030 at p. ii, available at https://laborcenter.berkeley.edu/ wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Putting-California-on-the-High-Road.pdf. 2 South Coast Air Quality Management District (May 7, 2021) Certify Final Environmental Assessment and Adopt Proposed Rule 2305 – Warehouse Indirect Source Rule – Warehouse Actions and Investments to Reduce Emissions Program, and Proposed Rule 316 – Fees for Rule 2305, Submit Rule 2305 for Inclusion Into the SIP, and Approve Supporting Budget Actions, available at http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/defaultsource/Agendas/Governing-Board/2021/2021-May7-027.pdf?sfvrsn=10. 3 California Planning Roundtable (2008) Deconstructing Jobs-Housing Balance at p. 6, available at https://cproundtable.org/static/media/uploads/publications/cpr-jobshousing.pdf 4 Cervero, Robert and Duncan, Michael (2006) Which Reduces Vehicle Travel More: JobsHousing Balance or Retail-Housing Mixing? Journal of the American Planning Association 72 (4), 475-490, 482, available at http://reconnectingamerica.org/assets/Uploads/UTCT825.pdf.
B2-2
cont.
17 other workforce policies to local development permits to address transportation issues. Cervero and Duncan note that:
In nearly built-out Berkeley, CA, the approach to balancing jobs and housing is to create local jobs rather than to develop new housing. The city’s First Source program encourages businesses to hire local residents, especially for entry- and intermediate-level jobs, and sponsors vocational training to ensure residents are employment-ready. While the program is voluntary, some 300 businesses have used it to date, placing more than 3,000 city residents in local jobs since it was launched in 1986. When needed, these carrots are matched by sticks, since the city is not shy about negotiating corporate participation in First Source as a condition of approval for development permits.
Recently, the State of California verified its commitment towards workforce development through the Affordable Housing and High Road Jobs Act of 2022, otherwise known as Assembly Bill No. 2011 (“AB2011”). AB2011 amended the Planning and Zoning Law to allow ministerial, by-right approval for projects being built alongside commercial corridors that meet affordability and labor requirements.
The City should consider utilizing local workforce policies and requirements to benefit the local area economically and to mitigate greenhouse gas, improve air quality, and reduce transportation impacts.
II. THE CITY SHOULD IMPOSE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS FOR
THE PROJECT’S CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES TO PREVENT
COMMUNITY SPREAD OF COVID-19 AND OTHER INFECTIOUS
DISEASES
Construction work has been defined as a Lower to High-risk activity for COVID-19 spread by the Occupations Safety and Health Administration. Recently, several construction sites have been identified as sources of community spread of COVID19.5
5 Santa Clara County Public Health (June 12, 2020) COVID-19 CASES AT
CONSTRUCTION SITES HIGHLIGHT NEED FOR CONTINUED VIGILANCE IN SECTORS THAT HAVE REOPENED, available at https://www.sccgov.org/sites/ covid19/Pages/press-release-06-12-2020-cases-at-construction-sites.aspx.
B2-2
cont.
B2-3
18 Western Carpenters recommend that the Lead Agency adopt additional requirements to mitigate public health risks from the Project’s construction activities. Western Carpenters requests that the Lead Agency require safe on-site construction work practices as well as training and certification for any construction workers on the Project Site.
In particular, based upon Western Carpenters’ experience with safe construction site work practices, Western Carpenters recommends that the Lead Agency require that while construction activities are being conducted at the Project Site:
Construction Site Design:
• The Project Site will be limited to two controlled entry points.
• Entry points will have temperature screening technicians taking temperature readings when the entry point is open. • The Temperature Screening Site Plan shows details
regarding access to the Project Site and Project Site logistics for conducting temperature screening.
• A 48-hour advance notice will be provided to all trades prior to the first day of temperature screening.
• The perimeter fence directly adjacent to the entry points will be clearly marked indicating the appropriate 6-foot social distancing position for when you approach the screening area. Please reference the Apex temperature screening site map for additional details.
• There will be clear signage posted at the project site directing you through temperature screening.
• Provide hand washing stations throughout the construction site.
Testing Procedures:
• The temperature screening being used are non-contact
devices.
• Temperature readings will not be recorded.
B2-3
cont.
19 • Personnel will be screened upon entering the testing center and should only take 1-2 seconds per individual.
• Hard hats, head coverings, sweat, dirt, sunscreen or any other cosmetics must be removed on the forehead before
temperature screening.
• Anyone who refuses to submit to a temperature screening or does not answer the health screening questions will be
refused access to the Project Site.
• Screening will be performed at both entrances from 5:30 am to 7:30 am.; main gate [ZONE 1] and personnel gate
[ZONE 2]
• After 7:30 am only the main gate entrance [ZONE 1] will continue to be used for temperature testing for anybody gaining entry to the project site such as returning personnel, deliveries, and visitors.
• If the digital thermometer displays a temperature reading above 100.0 degrees Fahrenheit, a second reading will be taken to verify an accurate reading.
• If the second reading confirms an elevated temperature, DHS will instruct the individual that he/she will not be allowed to enter the Project Site. DHS will also instruct the individual to promptly notify his/her supervisor and his/her human resources (HR) representative and provide them with a copy of Annex A.
Planning
• Require the development of an Infectious Disease
Preparedness and Response Plan that will include basic
infection prevention measures (requiring the use of personal protection equipment), policies and procedures for prompt identification and isolation of sick individuals, social distancing (prohibiting gatherings of no more than 10
people including all-hands meetings and all-hands lunches) B2-3
cont.
20 communication and training and workplace controls that meet standards that may be promulgated by the Center for Disease Control, Occupational Safety and Health
Administration, Cal/OSHA, California Department of
Public Health or applicable local public health agencies.6 The United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Carpenters International Training Fund has developed COVID-19 Training and Certification to ensure that Carpenter union members and apprentices conduct safe work practices. The Agency should require that all construction workers undergo COVID-19 Training and Certification before being allowed to conduct construction activities at the Project Site.
Western Carpenters has also developed a rigorous Infection Control Risk Assessment (“ICRA”) training program to ensure it delivers a workforce that understands how to identify and control infection risks by implementing protocols to protect themselves and all others during renovation and construction projects in healthcare environments.7
ICRA protocols are intended to contain pathogens, control airflow, and protect patients during the construction, maintenance and renovation of healthcare facilities.
ICRA protocols prevent cross contamination, minimizing the risk of secondary infections in patients at hospital facilities.
The City should require the Project to be built using a workforce trained in ICRA protocols.
III. THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
CEQA is a California statute designed to inform decision-makers and the public about the potential significant environmental effects of a project. 14 California Code of Regulations (“CEQA Guidelines”), § 15002, subd. (a)(1).8 At its core, its purpose 6 See also The Center for Construction Research and Training, North America’s Building Trades Unions (April 27 2020) NABTU and CPWR COVIC-19 Standards for U.S Constructions Sites, available at https://www.cpwr.com/sites/default/files/NABTU_ CPWR_Standards_COVID-19.pdf; Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (2020) Guidelines for Construction Sites During COVID-19 Pandemic, available at https://dpw.lacounty.gov/building-and-safety/docs/pw_guidelines-construction-sites.pdf. 7 For details concerning Western Carpenters’ ICRA training program, see https://www.swmsctf.org/courses/icra-best-practices-in-health-care-construction/ 8 The CEQA Guidelines, codified in Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, section 15000 et seq., are regulatory guidelines promulgated by the state Natural Resources Agency for the B2-3
cont.
B2-4
21 is to “inform the public and its responsible officials of the environmental consequences of their decisions before they are made. Thus, the EIR ‘protects not only the environment but also informed self-government[.]’” Citizens of Goleta Valley v.
Board of Supervisors (1990) 52 Cal.3d 553, 564 (internal citation omitted).
To achieve this purpose, CEQA mandates preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) for projects so that the foreseeable impacts of pursuing the project can be understood and weighed. Communities for a Better Environment v. Richmond (2010) 184 Cal. App. 4th 70, 80. The EIR requirement “is the heart of CEQA.” CEQA Guidelines, § 15003(a).
CEQA directs public agencies to avoid or reduce environmental damage, when possible, by requiring alternatives or mitigation measures. CEQA Guidelines, § 15002, subds. (a)(2)-(3); see also Berkeley Keep Jets Over the Bay Committee v. Board of Port Commissioners of the City of Oakland (2001) 91 Cal.App.4th 1344, 1354; Laurel Heights Improvement Assn. v. Regents of University of California (1988) 47 Cal.3d 376, 400. The Environmental Impact Report (EIR) serves to provide public agencies and the public in general with information about the effect that a proposed project is likely to have on the environment and to “identify ways that environmental damage can be avoided or significantly reduced.” CEQA Guidelines, § 15002, subd. (a)(2).
A public agency must prepare an EIR whenever substantial evidence supports a “fair argument” that a proposed project “may have a significant effect on the environment.” Pub. Res. Code, §§ 21100, 21151; CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15002, subds. (f)(1)-(2), 15063; No Oil, supra, 13 Cal.App.3d at p. 75; Communities for a Better Environment v. California Resources Agency (2002) 103 Cal.App.4th 98, 111-112. If the project has a significant effect on the environment, the agency may approve the project only upon finding that it has “eliminated or substantially lessened all significant effects on the environment where feasible” and that any unavoidable significant effects on the environment are “acceptable due to overriding concerns” specified in Public Resources Code section 21081. See CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15092, subds. (b)(2)(A)-(B).
Essentially, should a lead agency be presented with a fair argument that a project may have a significant effect on the environment, the lead agency shall prepare an EIR implementation of CEQA. Pub. Res. Code, § 21083. The CEQA Guidelines are given “great weight in interpreting CEQA except when . . . clearly unauthorized or erroneous.” Center for Biological Diversity v. Dept. of Fish & Wildlife (2015) 62 Cal.4th 204, 217.
B2-4
cont.
22 even though it may also be presented with other substantial evidence that the project will not have a significant effect. CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15064(f)(1)-(2); see No Oil, supra, 13 Cal.App.3d at p. 75 (internal citations and quotations omitted). Substantial evidence includes “enough relevant information and reasonable inferences from this information that a fair argument can be made to support a conclusion, even though other conclusions might also be reached.” CEQA Guidelines, § 15384, subd. (a).
The EIR has been described as “an environmental ‘alarm bell’ whose purpose it is to alert the public and its responsible officials to environmental changes before they have reached ecological points of no return.” Berkeley Keep Jets Over the Bay v. Bd. of Port Comm’rs. (2001) 91 Cal. App. 4th 1344, 1354 (“Berkeley Jets”); County of Inyo v. Yorty (1973) 32 Cal. App. 3d 795, 810.
The preparation and circulation of an EIR is more than a set of technical hurdles for agencies and developers to overcome. Communities for a Better Environment v. Richmond (2010) 184 Cal.App.4th 70, 80 (quoting Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. City of Rancho Cordova (2007) 40 Cal.4th 412, 449-450). The EIR’s function is to ensure that government officials who decide to build or approve a project do so with a full understanding of the environmental consequences and, equally important, that the public is assured those consequences have been considered. Id. For the EIR to serve these goals it must present information so that the foreseeable impacts of pursuing the project can be understood and weighed, and the public must be given an adequate opportunity to comment on that presentation before the decision to go forward is made. Id.
A strong presumption in favor of requiring preparation of an EIR is built into CEQA.
This presumption is reflected in what is known as the “fair argument” standard under which an EIR must be prepared whenever substantial evidence in the record supports a fair argument that a project may have a significant effect on the environment. Quail Botanical Gardens Found., Inc. v. City of Encinitas (1994) 29 Cal.App.4th 1597, 1602; Friends of “B” St. v. City of Hayward (1980) 106 Cal.3d 988, 1002.
Further, it is the duty of the lead agency, not the public, to conduct the proper environmental studies. “The agency should not be allowed to hide behind its own failure to gather relevant data.” Sundstrom, supra, 202 Cal.App.3d at p. 311. “Deficiencies in the record may actually enlarge the scope of fair argument by lending a logical plausibility to a wider range of inferences.” Ibid; see also Gentry v. City of B2-4
cont.
23 Murrieta (1995) 36 Cal.App.4th 1359, 1382 (lack of study enlarges the scope of the fair argument which may be made based on the limited facts in the record).
Thus, refusal to complete recommended studies lowers the already low threshold to establish a fair argument. The court may not exercise its independent judgment on the omitted material by determining whether the ultimate decision of the lead agency would have been affected had the law been followed. Environmental Protection Information Center v. Cal. Dept. of Forestry (2008) 44 Cal.4th 459, 486 (internal citations and quotations omitted). The remedy for this deficiency would be for the trial court to issue a writ of mandate. Ibid.
While the courts review an EIR using an ‘abuse of discretion’ standard, the reviewing court is not to uncritically rely on every study or analysis presented by a project proponent in support of its position. Berkeley Keep Jets, supra, 91 Cal.App.4th at p. 1355 (quoting Laurel Heights, supra, 47 Cal.3d at pp. 391, 409 fn. 12) (internal quotations omitted). A clearly inadequate or unsupported study is entitled to no judicial deference. Ibid. Drawing this line and determining whether the EIR complies with CEQA’s information disclosure requirements presents a question of law subject to independent review by the courts. Sierra Club v. County of Fresno (2018) 6 Cal.5th 502, 515; Madera Oversight Coalition, Inc. v. County of Madera (2011) 199 Cal.App.4th 48, 102, 131. As the First District Court of Appeal has previously stated, prejudicial abuse of discretion occurs if the failure to include relevant information precludes informed decision-making and informed public participation, thereby thwarting the statutory goals of the EIR process. Berkeley Keep Jets, supra, 91 Cal.App.4th at p. 1355 (internal quotations omitted).
Both the review for failure to follow CEQA’s procedures and the fair argument test are questions of law, thus, the de novo standard of review applies. Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth v. City of Rancho Cordova (2007) 40 Cal.4th 412, 435.
Whether the agency’s record contains substantial evidence that would support a fair argument that the project may have a significant effect on the environment is treated as a question of law. Consolidated Irrigation Dist., supra, 204 Cal.App.4th at p. 207; Kostka and Zischke, Practice Under the Environmental Quality Act (2017, 2d ed.) at § 6.76.
Section 15088.5(a) of the CEQA Guidelines provides that an EIR must be recirculated whenever there is disclosure of significant new information. Significant new information includes: (1) disclosure of a new significant environmental impact resulting from the project or from a new proposed mitigation measure; (2) disclosure B2-4
cont.
24 of a substantial increase in the severity of an environmental impact unless mitigation measures are adopted that reduce the impact to a level of insignificance; and (3) disclosure of a feasible project alternative or mitigation measure considerably different from others previously analyzed which would clearly lessen the significant environmental impacts of the project which the project proponents decline to adopt.
Id.
Additionally, an EIR must be recirculated when it is so fundamentally inadequate and conclusory in nature that meaningful public review and comment is precluded. Id. [citing Mountain Lion Coalition v. Fish & Game Com. (1989) 214 Cal.App.3d 1043].
Here, as discussed below, the DEIR fails to substantiate all of its conclusions to allow meaningful public review and comment, provide adequate mitigation measures, and fully assess all pertinent environmental factors. Accordingly, this comment letter discloses significant new information, necessitating revision and recirculation of the DEIR.
IV. THE DEIR IS INADEQUATE UNDER CEQA AND SHOULD BE
REVISED AND RECIRCULATED
A. The DEIR Fails to Support Its Findings with Substantial Evidence CEQA requires that an EIR identify and discuss the significant effects of a Project, how those significant effects can be mitigated or avoided. CEQA Guidelines § 15126.2; PRC §§ 21100(b)(1), 21002.1(a). If a project has a significant effect on the environment, an agency may approve the project only upon finding that it has “eliminated or substantially lessened all significant effects on the environment where feasible” and that any unavoidable significant effects on the environment are “acceptable due to overriding concerns.” CEQA Guidelines § 15092(b)(2) (A–B). Such findings must be supported by substantial evidence. CEQA Guidelines § 15091(b).
When new information is brought to light showing that an impact previously discussed in the DEIR but found to be insignificant with or without mitigation in the DEIR’s analysis has the potential for a significant environmental impact supported by substantial evidence, the DEIR must consider and resolve the conflict in the evidence.
See Visalia Retail, L.P. v. City of Visalia (2018) 20 Cal.App.5th 1, 13, 17; see also Protect the Historic Amador Waterways v. Amador Water Agency (2004) 116 Cal. App. 4th 1099, 1109. While a lead agency has discretion to formulate standards for determining significance and the need for mitigation measures—the choice of any standards or B2-4
cont.
B2-5
25 thresholds of significance must be “based to the extent possible on scientific and factual data and an exercise of reasoned judgment based on substantial evidence.
CEQA Guidelines § 15064(b); Cleveland Nat'l Forest Found. v. San Diego Ass'n of Gov'ts (2017) 3 Cal. App. 5th 497, 515; Mission Bay Alliance v. Office of Community Inv. & Infrastructure (2016) 6 Cal. App. 5th 160, 206. And when there is evidence that an impact could be significant, an EIR cannot adopt a contrary finding without providing an adequate explanation along with supporting evidence. East Sacramento Partnership for a Livable City v. City of Sacramento (2016) 5 Cal. App. 5th 281, 302.
Here, for the reasons discussed in detail below, the DEIR fails to comply with the foregoing requirements.
1. The DEIR Fails to Conduct Adequate Study and Analysis of the Project’s Noise Impacts
The DEIR for the Project concludes that the Project will result in less than significant noise and vibration impacts based, in part, on its finding that: “[t]he closest noise sensitive receptors near the site are multi-family residences approximately 300 feet south of the southernmost project boundary along North La Brea Avenue.” (DEIR, pp. 4.10-4 – 5; see also DEIR, p. 4.10-12.) However, in reaching this conclusion the DEIR misstates and misapplies the City’s Noise Ordinance as the threshold of significance for noise impacts, claiming that the Noise Ordinance “establishes a noise level limit of 60 dBA.” DEIR, p. 4.13-13. The standard that the DEIR should have considered and analyzed as a its threshold of significance for the Project’s anticipated noise impacts is set forth by Anaheim Municipal Code section 18.40.090, which provides an exterior construction noise limit of 65 dBA CNEL for exterior yards and common areas of existing residential developments. Meanwhile, the DEIR, by its own studies (and which appear to have further underreported the Project’s noise impacts based on the improper placement of noise measurement equipment L3/R3 and L4/R4), determined that the sensitive receptors in R3 and R4 would be exposed to construction noise levels in excess of 65 dBA CNEL. See DEIR, p. 4.13-13, Tables
4.13-6 and 4.13-7.
Accordingly, the DEIR admits that the Project’s noise impacts are potentially significant, and yet, it improperly does not provide for any mitigation to reduce its anticipated significant noise impacts. As such, and absent revision and recirculation of the DEIR to include added noise mitigation measures that demonstrably reduce the B2-5
cont.
B2-6
26 Project’s construction noise impacts below the threshold of significance, the Project will continue to violate CEQA with regard to its noise impacts.
B. The DEIR Improperly Relies Exclusively on Regulatory Compliance in Its Assessment of Biological Resources Impacts The DEIR notes that construction of the Project would require removal of 211 existing on-site trees located throughout the Project site. (IS, p. 30.) While the DEIR notes the potential for the removal of these trees to affect nesting and/or special status bird species (see DEIR p. 4.4-9 – “The existing trees have the potential to support nesting migratory birds that are protected by the MBTA and CFGC.”), the DEIR for the Project then proceeds to conduct no study or analysis whatsoever of the Project’s Biological Resources impacts, while inexplicably determining that the Project’s baseline Biological Resources impacts will be “Less Than Significant” before mitigation. See DEIR, p. ES-9. The DEIR goes on to rely entirely upon its purported Regulatory Compliance Measure RCM BIO-1 (Nesting Migratory Birds) to dispose of any potential concerns over such impacts, concluding that no actual mitigation is required to achieve less than significant impacts. See DEIR pp. 4.4-8 – 9.
RCM BIO-1 provides as follows:
To prevent inadvertent disturbance to potential nesting migratory birds, a qualified biologist shall be contracted by the Property Owner/Developer prior to the issuance of any demolition permits to perform biological monitoring during all demolition, clearing, grubbing, and grading activities.
To the extent feasible, all demolition, clearing, grubbing, and grading activities shall be conducted outside of the state-identified nesting season for migratory birds (i.e., typically February 1 through August 31). If not feasible, a Pre-Construction Nesting Bird Survey within and adjacent to the Project site shall be conducted by a qualified biologist no more than three days before beginning these activities. If active nests are found during the Pre-Construction Nesting Bird Survey, a Nesting Bird Plan (NBP) shall be prepared by a qualified biologist and implemented during construction with approval from the City. At a minimum, the NBP shall include guidelines for addressing the active nest(s), proposed protective buffers, proposed monitoring approach, and proposed reporting Type tex
B2-6
cont.
B2-7
27 approach. The size and location of all buffer zones, if required, shall be based on the nesting species, nesting sage, nest location, its sensitivity to disturbance, and intensity and duration of the disturbance activity. A memorandum describing the results of the Pre-Construction Nesting Bird Survey shall be submitted to the Planning and Building Department for verification prior to proceeding with demolition, clearing, grubbing, and/or grading activities subject to this measure. Any NBP developed pursuant to this measure shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to implementation.
Id.
Notably, the RCM defines the nesting period as February-August, contrary to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s (“CDFW”) finding that raptor nesting may commence before and/or after this timeframe.9
Further investigation of the information contained on the CDFW’s “California Outdoors Q&A” webpage reveals that the boundaries of bird nesting season in California are broad and variable: “[N]esting season can vary based on location and species of bird, and in some parts of the state, birds nest year-round.”10 Furthermore, as noted by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife in a November 18, 2021, letter to the City of Adelanto concerning a similar preconstruction nesting bird survey mitigation measure:
CDFW is concern[ed] that [the mitigation measure] is conditioned to only require surveys during the peak bird nesting season considering that birds, such as hummingbirds may nest year-round. Furthermore, [the mitigation measure] defines bird nesting season as February 1 to August 31. Please note that nesting may commence before and/or after this timeframe. For example, some species of raptors (e g. owls, hawks, etc.) may commence nesting activities in January, and passerines may nest later than August 31.
Fish and Game Code Section 3503 makes it unlawful to take, possess, or 9 “…[S]ome species of raptors (e g. owls, hawks, etc.) may commence nesting activities in January.” See CDFW November 18, 2021 letter to City of Adelanto, available at https://files.ceqanet.opr.ca.gov/273819-1/attachment/
zo76RgD7dUdj5BLJTEhEMdf74g6f100RrKiWBQSquhFFe5l0X53rLsbLSGMPRXgXM4AaYnJST fZB6JpY0 10 See CDFW California Outdoors Q&A – Nesting Birds https://wildlife.ca.gov/COQA/ ArticlePage/2/tag/conflict#gsc.tab=0
B2-7
cont.
28 needlessly destroy the nest or eggs of any bird, except as otherwise provided by Fish and Game Code or any regulation made pursuant thereto.
These added qualifications by CDFW regarding bird nesting season are consistent with, and underscore, CDFW’s separate finding that birds and raptor nesting in the Project’s geographic region can and does occur outside the more general bird nesting period of February-August sought by the DEIR in RCM BIO-1. Moreover, CDFW’s collective findings on this issue, coupled with the Project site’s adjacency and/or very close proximity to undeveloped wildland and conservation areas (e.g., Deer Canyon Park, the Weir Canyon Nature Preserve, the Oak Canyon Nature Center, and the Fremont Canyon Nature Preserve) confirm the inadequacy of both the City’s analysis of the Project’s potential biological resources impacts to nesting and migratory birds and the exclusive regulatory reliance as a basis for disposing of the potential for any such impacts.
Furthermore, a determination that regulatory compliance will be sufficient to prevent significant adverse impacts must be based on a project-specific analysis of potential impacts and the effect of regulatory compliance. In Californians for Alternatives to Toxics v.
Department of Food & Agric. (2005) 136 Cal. App. 4th 1, the court set aside an EIR for a statewide crop disease control plan because it did not include an evaluation of the risks to the environment and human health from the proposed program but simply presumed that no adverse impacts would occur from use of pesticides in accordance with the registration and labeling program of the California Department of Pesticide Regulation. See also Ebbetts Pass Forest Watch v Department of Forestry & Fire Protection (2008) 43 Cal. App. 4th 936, 956 (fact that Department of Pesticide Regulation had assessed environmental effects of certain herbicides in general did not excuse failure to assess effects of their use for specific timber harvesting project).
Here, the DEIR does not set forth any analysis or study demonstrating the Project’s baseline potential impacts on biological resources, juxtaposed with an analysis of how the Project’s purported regulatory compliance would reduce potential impacts on nesting bird species to a less than significant level, such that no further study or analysis would be warranted. Rather, the DEIR bases its conclusion regarding the mitigating effects of regulatory compliance simply on assumptions regarding the Project Site and the surrounding urbanized areas. Under CEQA, such unsupported assumptions are improper. To that end, the RCM violates CEQA, as its use here B2-7
cont.
29 results in the DEIR failing to disclose “the analytic route that the agency took from the evidence to its findings.” (Cal. Public Resources Code § 21081.5; CEQA Guidelines § 15093; Village Laguna of Laguna Beach, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors (1982) 134 Cal. App. 3d 1022, 1035 [quoting Topanga Assn for a Scenic Community v. County of Los Angeles (1974) 11 Cal. 3d 506, 515.])
Additionally, RCM BIO-1 as framed, presents as a commonplace biological mitigation measure implemented as part of CEQA review for a development project. The language and requirements included in the measures are indicative of an overall finding that the Project has the potential to result in significant impacts on biological resources. However, because of the methodology being applied by the City in the DEIR for this Project, the RCM will not be enforceable in the same manner as standard mitigation measures incorporated in the Project’s Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan. A mitigation measure must be enforceable through conditions of approval, contracts or other means that are legally binding. (PRC § 21081.6; CEQA Guidelines § 15126.4(a)(2).) Mitigation measures should be implemented, not adopted and ignored (Federation of Hillside & Canyon Ass’ns v. City of Los Angeles (2000) 83 Cal.App.4th 1252, 1261.) The DEIR for the Project currently provides no concrete assurance that RCM BIO-1 (even in its current in adequate form) will in fact be implemented in connection with the construction of the Project.
Accordingly, the nesting period and survey plan set forth in the RCM BIO-1 is inadequate based on CDFW’s own guidance, and the DEIR cannot permissibly rely exclusively on regulatory compliance without a greater showing and analysis, based on substantial evidence, that the Project’s biological resources impacts will be less than significant based on said regulatory compliance. Given that, at a minimum, the DEIR must be revised and recirculated to demonstrate sufficient analysis and study of the Project’s biological resources impacts and substantial evidence to indicate that the Project’s compliance with the Fish and Game Code and Migratory Bird Treaty Act will sufficiently mitigate any such impacts. Based on the positions set forth by CDFW in its guidance, the DEIR should further be revised to require that prior to construction of the Project, a sweep should be conducted verifying the absence of any nesting birds during both nesting and non-nesting seasons in order to account for CDFW’s findings pertaining to the bird/raptor nesting season within the Project’s geographic region.
Absent such revision, the proposed RCM and, by extension, the DEIR will be in direct violation of the CEQA Guidelines.
B2-7
cont.
30 1. The DEIR Fails to Study and Mitigate the Project’s Biological Resources Impacts Due to Planned Tree Removal As stated above, the Project, as proposed, plans and intends to remove 211 mature trees currently present on the Project site, with some as tall as 65 feet and/or having trunk circumferences as large as 57 inches and crown widths of 30 feet across. See DEIR Appendix 4.4-1, pp. 2-3. Despite its removal of a large number of established trees, the proposed Project does not contemplate or provide specifics on any new replacement trees that will be planted as part of the development process. Instead, the Project’s DEIR and its associated Specimen Tree Report (Appendix 4.4-1) hides behind the notion that the City’s Tree Ordinance does not require any replacement trees to be planted as mitigation for the tree removal. In this regard, the DEIR improperly conflates the Project’s regulatory compliance as to the contemplated tree removal with a less than significant biological resources impact.
Again, a determination that regulatory compliance will be sufficient to prevent significant adverse impacts must be based on a project-specific analysis of potential impacts and the effect of regulatory compliance. See Californians for Alternatives to Toxics, supra, (2005) 136 Cal.App.4th 1. Here, the DEIR improperly fails to disclose “the analytic route that the agency took from the evidence to its findings.” (Cal. Public Resources Code § 21081.5; CEQA Guidelines § 15093; Village Laguna of Laguna Beach, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors (1982) 134 Cal. App. 3d 1022, 1035 [quoting Topanga Assn for a Scenic Community v. County of Los Angeles (1974) 11 Cal. 3d 506, 515.]) The deficiency of the DEIR and its mitigation of the impacts of the planned tree removal is underscored by the fact that the DEIR’s Specimen Tree Report recommends that “…trees be incorporated be incorporated into the redeveloped landscape…” for the Project.
DEIR, Appendix 4.4-1, p. 3. Despite this acknowledgement in the impact study, the Project and its DEIR fail to commit to any types or quantities of tree to be replanted as part of the development.
Accordingly, the DEIR further fails to properly study, analyze, and mitigate the Project’s biological resources impacts, despite the substantial evidence of potentially significant impacts, such that revision and recirculation of the DEIR is now required under CEQA.
B2-8
31 C. The DEIR’s Mitigation Measures Are Insufficient
A fundamental purpose of an EIR is to identify ways in which a proposed project's significant environmental impacts can be mitigated or avoided. Pub. Res. Code §§ 21002.1(a), 21061. To implement this statutory purpose, an EIR must describe any feasible mitigation measures that can minimize the project's significant environmental effects. PRC §§ 21002.1(a), 21100(b)(3); CEQA Guidelines §§ 15121(a), 15126.4(a).
If the project has a significant effect on the environment, the agency may approve the project only upon finding that it has “eliminated or substantially lessened all significant effects on the environment where feasible” PRC §§ 21002; 21002.1, 21081; CEQA Guidelines §§ 15091, 15092(b)(2)(A); and find that ‘specific overriding economic, legal, social, technology or other benefits of the project outweigh the significant effects on the environment.” PRC §§ 21002; 21002.1, 21081; CEQA Guidelines §§ 15091, 15092(b)(2)(B). “A gloomy forecast of environmental degradation is of little or no value without pragmatic, concrete means to minimize the impacts and restore ecological equilibrium.” Environmental Council of Sacramento v. City of Sacramento (2006) 142 Cal.App.4th 1018, 1039.
CEQA mitigation measures proposed and adopted are required to describe what actions will be taken to reduce or avoid an environmental impact. (CEQA Guidelines § 15126.4(a)(1)(B) [providing “[f]ormulation of mitigation measures should not be deferred until some future time.”].) While the same Guidelines section 15126.5(a)(1)(B) acknowledges an exception to the rule against deferrals, such exception is narrowly proscribed to situations where it is impractical or infeasible to include those details during the project's environmental review.
According to CEQA Guidelines, “[w]hen an EIR has been prepared for a project, the Responsible Agency shall not approve the project as proposed if the agency finds any feasible alternative or feasible mitigation measures within its powers that would substantially lessen or avoid any significant effect the project would have on the environment.” CEQA Guidelines Section 15096(g)(2).
Here, the EIR’s mitigation measures for the Project are inadequate as follows:
1. The DEIR’s Mitigation Measures Are Improperly Deferred CEQA forbids deferred mitigation. Guidelines § 15126.4(a)(1)(B). CEQA allows deferral of details of a mitigation measure only “when it is impractical or infeasible to include those details during the project’s environmental review.” (Id.) CEQA further B2-9
B2-10
32 requires: “that the agency (1) commits itself to the mitigation, (2) adopts specific performance standards the mitigation will achieve, and (3) identifies the type(s) of potential action(s) that can feasibly achieve that performance standard…” Guidelines § 15126.4(a)(1)(B). Deferring formulation of a Project’s actual mitigation measures to some undefined time after the Project’s approval is improper and cannot be used as a substitute for proper mitigation under CEQA. Impermissible deferral can occur when an EIR calls for mitigation measures to be created based on future studies or describes mitigation measures in general terms but the agency fails to commit itself to specific performance standards. (Preserve Wild Santee v. City of Santee (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 260, 281 [city improperly deferred mitigation to butterfly habitat by failing to provide standards or guidelines for its management].) Here, the EIR improperly defers details of the Project’s mitigation measures as discussed in detail below.
i. Cultural Resources Mitigation Measures
The Project’s Cultural Resources Mitigation Measure CUL-2 provides as follows, in relevant part:
Archaeologist Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of the grading permit, the Property Owner/Developer shall retain a qualified archaeologist to observe grading activities within previously undisturbed soils and to salvage and catalog archaeological resources, as necessary. The archaeologist will establish procedures for surveillance and for temporarily halting or redirecting work for artifact sampling, identification, and evaluation.
DEIR at p. ES-10.
The above mitigation measure, on its face, defers the preparation of the required procedures for monitoring and halting/redirecting construction activities based on the presence and/or discovery of protected cultural resources at the project site. The postponement of the preparation of the substance of this mitigation measure denies the public and the City’s decisionmakers of the opportunity to assess the adequacy of the Project’s cultural resources mitigation and monitoring plan, and the Project’s overall impact on cultural resources with respect to ensuring such impacts are adequately mitigated and minimized. Indeed, because of this deferment, the City’s decisionmakers have been denied the opportunity to fully consider the scope of the Type tex
B2-10
cont.
B2-11
33 Project’s potential impacts to cultural resources and whether such impacts have been adequately mitigated, while the general public has also been denied the opportunity to assess and comment upon the associated impacts and the adequacy of the mitigation plans.
Thus, in the context of MM CUL-1, the City has failed to meet CEQA’s preconditions and requirements concerning mitigation, as the DEIR has failed to show why the Project’s cultural resources response plan, and a comprehensive analysis of the Project’s anticipated impacts on such cultural resources, cannot be completed or achieved at this time prior to adoption of the EIR. The deferment of this study and analysis also improperly constrains the DEIR’s assessment of the impacts that the measure will have individually or cumulatively, and the specific performance criteria the Applicant will have to meet with regard to the measures. Accordingly, the proposed mitigation measure is improperly deferred as it defers the formulation of components of the mitigation to a later time and further does not explain how the measure will clearly reduce the Project’s cultural resources impacts to a level of insignificance. ii. Geology and Soils Mitigation Measures
The Project’s Geology and Soils Mitigation Measure MM GEO-1 provides as follows, in relevant part:
Prior to the issuance of grading and building permits, the City of Anaheim Building Division and Public Works Department shall review all Project plans for grading, foundation, structural, infrastructure, and all other relevant construction permits to ensure compliance with the recommendations contained in the Project's Geotechnical Exploration and Feasibility Report.
DEIR at p. ES-13.
Moreover, MM GEO-2 provides as follows, in relevant part:
If paleontological resources are inadvertently unearthed, the contractor shall immediately cease all earth-disturbing activities within a 50-foot radius. The paleontologist will evaluate the finding and determine an appropriate course of action, including salvage operations if avoidance is not feasible.
DEIR at p. ES-14 (emphasis added).
B2-11
cont.
B2-12
34 Much like the Project’s MM CUL-1, the above mitigation measures impermissibly defer the preparation of any actual mitigation associated with the Project’s geological impacts. Worse yet, MM GEO-1 vaguely attempts to incorporate by reference the “recommendations” of the Project’s Geotechnical Exploration and Feasibility Report as potential mitigation measures for the Project. The deferment of the preparation of these mitigation measures, coupled with MM GEO-1’s lack of specificity and certainty regarding what mitigation will in fact be deployed to combat impacts associated with potential seismic ground shaking and/or unstable/expansive soils, render the mitigation measures improperly deferred and uncertain. In this regard, the mitigation measure makes no commitment whatsoever to mitigation on this issue, which is required by CEQA.
Thus, in the context of MM GEO-1 and MM GEO-2, the City has failed to meet CEQA’s preconditions and requirements concerning mitigation, as the DEIR has failed to make the “recommendations” of the Geotechnical Exploration and Feasibility Report a mandatory component of mitigation on the Project and has failed to present a clear response plan in the event that paleontological resources are discovered during construction. Accordingly, the proposed mitigation measures, as currently constituted, violate CEQA and must be appropriately revised and recirculated.
iii. Hazards and Hazardous Materials Mitigation Measures The Project’s Hazards and Hazardous Materials Mitigation Measure MM HAZ-1 provides as follows, in relevant part:
Construction Management Plan: Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a Construction Management Plan shall be prepared by the Property Owner/Developer for review and approval by Anaheim Fire and Rescue, in accordance with MUTCD. It must identify emergency access points and routes throughout all construction phases.
DEIR at p. ES-17.
The Project’s Mitigation Measure MM HAZ-1 improperly and unjustifiably defers preparation of the Construction Management Plan (CMP) until after the Project has been approved by the City and shortly before construction is to commence. The preparation of the CMP in connection with the Project’s hazards mitigation efforts has been established as a required, unconditional mitigation effort in connection with B2-12
cont.
B2-13
35 the Project. As such, there is simply no valid explanation for the DEIR’s failure to prepare and include the required CMP the as part of the appendices for the Project’s environmental review, thereby providing the City and the general public with an full and appropriate opportunity to assess the adequacy of the Project’s hazards mitigation plans in this regard. The DEIR’s failure to prepare and provide this information at this time once again violates CEQA.
Thus, with respect to MM HAZ-1, the DEIR has once again failed to meet CEQA’s preconditions and requirements concerning mitigation by deferring the further study, analysis and preparation of mitigation measures and plans to address the Project’s anticipated Hazards impacts. The DEIR’s cannot permissibly constrain its assessment of the individual and cumulative impacts of these measures, or withhold reporting of the specific performance criteria the Applicant will have to meet with regard to the measures, particularly when there is nothing to prevent current further study of these impacts and the preparation of the required mitigation plan vis-à-vis the CMP. Once again, the DEIR has violated CEQA by deferring the formulation of critical aspects of its hazards mitigation to a later time, such that revision and recirculation of the DEIR to supply this necessary study and information is now required.
D. The DEIR Improperly Mischaracterizes its Transportation and Hazards Mitigation Measure as “Project Design Features” In this instance, the DEIR also improperly recasts what would otherwise be essential Transportation and Hazards impact mitigation measures as a “Project Design Features” or “PDF.” Relying in part on these PDFs for the Project, the DEIR then concludes that the Project’s Transportation impacts will be less than significant, and that no further mitigation is required, while also improperly leveraging the PDFs aimed at the Project’s Hazards impacts in conjunction with the Project’s lone Hazards mitigation measure, MM HAZ-1, to conclude that the Project’s otherwise significant hazards impacts have been to a less than significant level.
It is established that “‘[a]voidance, minimization and / or mitigation measure’ . . . are not ‘part of the project.’ . . . compressing the analysis of impacts and mitigation measures into a single issue . . . disregards the requirements of CEQA.” (Lotus v.
Department of Transportation (2014) 223 Cal. App. 4th 645, 656.) When “an agency decides to incorporate mitigation measures into its significance determination, and relies on those mitigation measures to determine that no B2-13
cont.
B2-14
36 significant effects will occur, that agency must treat those measures as though they were adopted following a finding of significance.” (Lotus, supra, 223 Cal. App. 4th at 652 [citing CEQA Guidelines § 15091(a)(1) and Cal. Public Resources Code § 21081(a)(1).])
By mischaracterizing the Transportation and Hazards mitigation measures as PDFs, the City violates CEQA by failing to disclose “the analytic route that the agency took from the evidence to its findings.” (Cal. Public Resources Code § 21081.5; CEQA Guidelines § 15093; Village Laguna of Laguna Beach, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors (1982) 134 Cal. App. 3d 1022, 1035 [quoting Topanga Assn for a Scenic Community v. County of Los Angeles (1974) 11 Cal. 3d 506, 515.])
Specifically, the DEIR delineates the following Transportation and Hazards PDFs to be applied to the project, which are tantamount to (and otherwise routinely adopted as) mitigation measures under CEQA:
PDF HAZ-1 Construction Fire Prevention Plan: Prior to
commencement of construction activities, the Property
Owner/Developer shall prepare and implement a Construction Fire Prevention Plan that identifies fire safety measures to be followed by the Project's contractor throughout all phases of construction. The Plan shall be submitted to Anaheim Fire & Rescue for review and approval prior to the start of construction activities.
PDF HAZ-2 Wildfire Evacuation and Awareness Plan: Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the first multiple-family residential unit, the Property Owner/Developer shall prepare and implement a Project-specific Wildfire Evacuation and Awareness Plan.
The Plan shall be subject to review and approval by the City of Anaheim Planning Department, Anaheim Police Department, and Anaheim Fire & Rescue. The Plan shall include, at a minimum, the following components:
(1) The Plan shall be provided to all tenants along with all lease agreements for development and dissemination of wildfire evacuation outreach materials. These materials shall be provided to residents and employees within the Project annually. The outreach materials shall depict evacuation routes to use in case of a wildfire event and will provide other practical wildfire preparedness information; (3) The Plan shall include requirements for annual emergency evacuation drills for residents and employees in the B2-14
cont.
37 Project site; and (4) The Plan shall include the development, implementation, and ongoing maintenance of a method for the Property Owner/Developer to quickly and effectively communicate emergency alerts to individuals at the Project site, such as through the installation and maintenance of a wireless Public Address (PA) system and/or wireless texting services, or other equivalent systems or methods approved by Anaheim Fire & Rescue.
…
PDF TRANS-1 Affordable Housing (CAPCOA Measure T-4): The Project shall include 45 moderate-income level housing units, representing 10 percent of the total 447 dwelling units. This measure is estimated to reduce project-generated VMT by approximately 2.86 percent or 1,621 VMT.
PDF TRANS-2 Limit Residential Parking Supply (CAPCOA
Measure T-15): The Project shall provide a total of 893 parking spaces, which is 70 spaces fewer than the 963 spaces required by the City's development standards. This reduction in parking supply is expected to reduce project-generated VMT by 1.0 percent, or 567 VMT.
DEIR, pp. ES-15 – 17, ES-24.
Notably, the DEIR acknowledges that, absent the incorporation of the foregoing PDFs in the Project, the Project is anticipated to have both significant Hazards and Transportation impacts with respect to (i) impairing the implementation of or physically interfering with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan, (ii) conflicting or being inconsistent with State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b), and (iii) resulting in inadequate emergency access . Id. According to the DEIR, these significant impacts of the Project will purportedly be cured, either in whole or in part, via the incorporation of PDF HAZ-1, PDF HAZ-2, PDF TRANS-1, and PDF TRANS-2.
However, implementing a Wildfire Evacuation and Awareness Plan, ensuring minimum levels of affordable housing, and limiting residential parking are not bona fide features of “project design.” Rather, the PDFs amount to the DEIR’s mislabeling and disguising of what are otherwise a mitigation measures for the Project. Here, the DEIR has premised it analysis regarding the allegedly “less than significant impact” on B2-14
cont.
38 Transportation and Hazards on the incorporation of the so-called PDFs. To that end, the Transportation and Hazards impacts analysis put forth in the DEIR is demonstrably tainted and flawed by the improper application and incorporation of these PDFs.
By recasting its transportation and hazards mitigation measures in this manner, the DEIR has attempted to skirt its responsibilities to fully analyze the various environmental impacts implicated by the PDFs. Such an attempt to evade accountability for addressing the Project’s transportation and hazards impacts directly violates CEQA, and the DEIR cannot permissibly be certified unless and until this deficiency is rectified.
V. CONCLUSION
Based on the foregoing concerns, the City should require revision and recirculation of the DEIR for the Project pursuant to CEQA. Absent doing so, the DEIR in its current form directly violates CEQA in multiple respects. If the City should have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact this office.
Sincerely,
______________________
Jeremy Herwitt
Attorneys for Western States Regional Council of Carpenters Attached:
March 8, 2021 SWAPE Letter to Mitchell M. Tsai re Local Hire Requirements and Considerations for Greenhouse Gas Modeling (Exhibit A); Air Quality and GHG Expert Paul Rosenfeld CV (Exhibit B); and Air Quality and GHG Expert Matt Hagemann CV (Exhibit C).
B2-14
cont.
B2-15
39 EXHIBIT A
40 1
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Matt Hagemann, P.G, C.Hg.
(949) 887-9013
[email protected]
Paul E. Rosenfeld, PhD
(310) 795-2335
[email protected]
March 8, 2021
Mitchell M. Tsai
155 South El Molino, Suite 104
Pasadena, CA 91101
Subject: Local Hire Requirements and Considerations for Greenhouse Gas Modeling Dear Mr. Tsai,
Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise (“SWAPE”) is pleased to provide the following draft technical report explaining the significance of worker trips required for construction of land use development projects with respect to the estimation of greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions. The report will also discuss the potential for local hire requirements to reduce the length of worker trips, and consequently, reduced or mitigate the potential GHG impacts.
Worker Trips and Greenhouse Gas Calculations
The California Emissions Estimator Model (“CalEEMod”) is a “statewide land use emissions computer model designed to provide a uniform platform for government agencies, land use planners, and environmental professionals to quantify potential criteria pollutant and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with both construction and operations from a variety of land use projects.”1 CalEEMod quantifies construction-related emissions associated with land use projects resulting from off-road construction equipment; on-road mobile equipment associated with workers, vendors, and hauling; fugitive dust associated with grading, demolition, truck loading, and on-road vehicles traveling along paved and unpaved roads; and architectural coating activities; and paving.2
The number, length, and vehicle class of worker trips are utilized by CalEEMod to calculate emissions associated with the on-road vehicle trips required to transport workers to and from the Project site during construction.3 1 “California Emissions Estimator Model.” CAPCOA, 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/home. 2 “California Emissions Estimator Model.” CAPCOA, 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/home. 3 “CalEEMod User’s Guide.” CAPCOA, November 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/defaultsource/caleemod/01_user-39-s-guide2016-3-2_15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. 34. 41 Technical Consultation, Data Analysis and
Litigation Support for the Environment
2 Specifically, the number and length of vehicle trips is utilized to estimate the vehicle miles travelled (“VMT”) associated with construction. Then, utilizing vehicle-class specific EMFAC 2014 emission factors, CalEEMod calculates the vehicle exhaust, evaporative, and dust emissions resulting from construction-related VMT, including personal vehicles for worker commuting.4
Specifically, in order to calculate VMT, CalEEMod multiplies the average daily trip rate by the average overall trip length (see excerpt below):
“VMTd = Σ(Average Daily Trip Rate i * Average Overall Trip Length i) n Where:
n = Number of land uses being modeled.”5
Furthermore, to calculate the on-road emissions associated with worker trips, CalEEMod utilizes the following equation (see excerpt below):
“Emissionspollutant = VMT * EFrunning,pollutant
Where:
Emissionspollutant = emissions from vehicle running for each pollutant VMT = vehicle miles traveled
EFrunning,pollutant = emission factor for running emissions.” 6 Thus, there is a direct relationship between trip length and VMT, as well as a direct relationship between VMT and vehicle running emissions. In other words, when the trip length is increased, the VMT and vehicle running emissions increase as a result. Thus, vehicle running emissions can be reduced by decreasing the average overall trip length, by way of a local hire requirement or otherwise.
Default Worker Trip Parameters and Potential Local Hire Requirements As previously discussed, the number, length, and vehicle class of worker trips are utilized by CalEEMod to calculate emissions associated with the on-road vehicle trips required to transport workers to and from the Project site during construction.7In order to understand how local hire requirements and associated worker trip length reductions impact GHG emissions calculations, it is important to consider the CalEEMod default worker trip parameters. CalEEMod provides recommended default values based on site-specific information, such as land use type, meteorological data, total lot acreage, project type and typical equipment associated with project type. If more specific project information is known, the user can change the default values and input projectspecific values, but the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) requires that such changes be justified by substantial evidence.8 The default number of construction-related worker trips is calculated by multiplying the 4 “Appendix A Calculation Details for CalEEMod.” CAPCOA, October 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/defaultsource/caleemod/02_appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 14-15. 5 “Appendix A Calculation Details for CalEEMod.” CAPCOA, October 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/defaultsource/caleemod/02_appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 23. 6 “Appendix A Calculation Details for CalEEMod.” CAPCOA, October 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/defaultsource/caleemod/02_appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 15. 7 “CalEEMod User’s Guide.” CAPCOA, November 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/defaultsource/caleemod/01_user-39-s-guide2016-3-2_15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. 34. 8 CalEEMod User Guide, available at: http://www.caleemod.com/, p. 1, 9. 42 3
number of pieces of equipment for all phases by 1.25, with the exception of worker trips required for the building construction and architectural coating phases.9Furthermore, the worker trip vehicle class is a 50/25/25 percent mix of light duty autos, light duty truck class 1 and light duty truck class 2, respectively.”10 Finally, the default worker trip length is consistent with the length of the operational home-to-work vehicle trips.11 The operational home-to-work vehicle trip lengths are:
“[B]ased on the location and urbanization selected on the project characteristic screen. These values were supplied by the air districts or use a default average for the state. Each district (or county) also assigns trip lengths for urban and rural settings” (emphasis added). 12 Thus, the default worker trip length is based on the location and urbanization level selected by the User when modeling emissions. The below table shows the CalEEMod default rural and urban worker trip lengths by air basin (see excerpt below and Attachment A).13
Worker Trip Length by Air Basin
Air Basin Rural (miles) Urban (miles)
Great Basin Valleys 16.8 10.8
Lake County 16.8 10.8
Lake Tahoe 16.8 10.8
Mojave Desert 16.8 10.8
Mountain Counties 16.8 10.8
North Central Coast 17.1 12.3
North Coast 16.8 10.8
Northeast Plateau 16.8 10.8
Sacramento Valley 16.8 10.8
Salton Sea 14.6 11
San Diego 16.8 10.8
San Francisco Bay Area 10.8 10.8
San Joaquin Valley 16.8 10.8
South Central Coast 16.8 10.8
South Coast 19.8 14.7
Average 16.47 11.17
Minimum 10.80 10.80
Maximum 19.80 14.70
Range 9.00 3.90
9 “CalEEMod User’s Guide.” CAPCOA, November 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/defaultsource/caleemod/01_user-39-s-guide2016-3-2_15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. 34. 10 “Appendix A Calculation Details for CalEEMod.” CAPCOA, October 2017, available at:
http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/caleemod/02_appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 15. 11 “Appendix A Calculation Details for CalEEMod.” CAPCOA, October 2017, available at:
http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/caleemod/02_appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 14. 12 “Appendix A Calculation Details for CalEEMod.” CAPCOA, October 2017, available at:
http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/caleemod/02_appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 21. 13 “Appendix D Default Data Tables.” CAPCOA, October 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/defaultsource/caleemod/05_appendix-d2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. D-84 – D-86. 43 4
As demonstrated above, default rural worker trip lengths for air basins in California vary from 10.8- to 19.8- miles, with an average of 16.47 miles. Furthermore, default urban worker trip lengths vary from 10.8- to 14.7- miles, with an average of 11.17 miles. Thus, while default worker trip lengths vary by location, default urban worker trip lengths tend to be shorter in length. Based on these trends evident in the CalEEMod default worker trip lengths, we can reasonably assume that the efficacy of a local hire requirement is especially dependent upon the urbanization of the project site, as well as the project location.
Practical Application of a Local Hire Requirement and Associated Impact To provide an example of the potential impact of a local hire provision on construction-related GHG emissions, we estimated the significance of a local hire provision for the Village South Specific Plan (“Project”) located in the City of Claremont (“City”). The Project proposed to construct 1,000 residential units, 100,000-SF of retail space, 45,000-SF of office space, as well as a 50-room hotel, on the 24-acre site. The Project location is classified as Urban and lies within the Los Angeles-South Coast County. As a result, the Project has a default worker trip length of 14.7 miles.14 In an effort to evaluate the potential for a local hire provision to reduce the Project’s construction-related GHG emissions, we prepared an updated model, reducing all worker trip lengths to 10 miles (see Attachment B). Our analysis estimates that if a local hire provision with a 10-mile radius were to be implemented, the GHG emissions associated with Project construction would decrease by approximately 17% (see table below and Attachment C).
Local Hire Provision Net Change
Without Local Hire Provision
Total Construction GHG Emissions (MT CO2e) 3,623
Amortized Construction GHG Emissions (MT CO2e/year) 120.77 With Local Hire Provision
Total Construction GHG Emissions (MT CO2e) 3,024
Amortized Construction GHG Emissions (MT CO2e/year) 100.80 % Decrease in Construction-related GHG Emissions 17%
As demonstrated above, by implementing a local hire provision requiring 10 mile worker trip lengths, the Project could reduce potential GHG emissions associated with construction worker trips. More broadly, any local hire requirement that results in a decreased worker trip length from the default value has the potential to result in a reduction of construction-related GHG emissions, though the significance of the reduction would vary based on the location and urbanization level of the project site.
This serves as an example of the potential impacts of local hire requirements on estimated project-level GHG emissions, though it does not indicate that local hire requirements would result in reduced construction-related GHG emission for all projects. As previously described, the significance of a local hire requirement depends on the worker trip length enforced and the default worker trip length for the project’s urbanization level and location.
14 “Appendix D Default Data Tables.” CAPCOA, October 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/defaultsource/caleemod/05_appendix-d2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. D-85. 44 5
Disclaimer
SWAPE has received limited discovery. Additional information may become available in the future; thus, we retain the right to revise or amend this report when additional information becomes available. Our professional services have been performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable environmental consultants practicing in this or similar localities at the time of service. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the scope of work, work methodologies and protocols, site conditions, analytical testing results, and findings presented. This report reflects efforts which were limited to information that was reasonably accessible at the time of the work, and may contain informational gaps, inconsistencies, or otherwise be incomplete due to the unavailability or uncertainty of information obtained or provided by third parties.
Sincerely,
Matt Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg.
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D.
45 Location Type Location Name Rural H-W
(miles)
Urban H-W
(miles)
Air Basin Great Basin 16.8 10.8
Air Basin Lake County 16.8 10.8
Air Basin Lake Tahoe 16.8 10.8
Air Basin Mojave Desert 16.8 10.8
Air Basin Mountain 16.8 10.8
Air Basin North Central 17.1 12.3
Air Basin North Coast 16.8 10.8
Air Basin Northeast 16.8 10.8
Air Basin Sacramento 16.8 10.8
Air Basin Salton Sea 14.6 11
Air Basin San Diego 16.8 10.8
Air Basin San Francisco 10.8 10.8
Air Basin San Joaquin 16.8 10.8
Air Basin South Central 16.8 10.8
Air Basin South Coast 19.8 14.7
Air District Amador County 16.8 10.8
Air District Antelope Valley 16.8 10.8
Air District Bay Area AQMD 10.8 10.8
Air District Butte County 12.54 12.54
Air District Calaveras 16.8 10.8
Air District Colusa County 16.8 10.8
Air District El Dorado 16.8 10.8
Air District Feather River 16.8 10.8
Air District Glenn County 16.8 10.8
Air District Great Basin 16.8 10.8
Air District Imperial County 10.2 7.3
Air District Kern County 16.8 10.8
Air District Lake County 16.8 10.8
Air District Lassen County 16.8 10.8
Air District Mariposa 16.8 10.8
Air District Mendocino 16.8 10.8
Air District Modoc County 16.8 10.8
Air District Mojave Desert 16.8 10.8
Air District Monterey Bay 16.8 10.8
Air District North Coast 16.8 10.8
Air District Northern Sierra 16.8 10.8
Air District Northern
16.8 10.8
Air District Placer County 16.8 10.8
Air District Sacramento 15 10
Attachment A
46 Air District San Diego 16.8 10.8
Air District San Joaquin
16.8 10.8
Air District San Luis Obispo 13 13
Air District Santa Barbara 8.3 8.3
Air District Shasta County 16.8 10.8
Air District Siskiyou County 16.8 10.8
Air District South Coast 19.8 14.7
Air District Tehama County 16.8 10.8
Air District Tuolumne 16.8 10.8
Air District Ventura County 16.8 10.8
Air District Yolo/Solano 15 10
County Alameda 10.8 10.8
County Alpine 16.8 10.8
County Amador 16.8 10.8
County Butte 12.54 12.54
County Calaveras 16.8 10.8
County Colusa 16.8 10.8
County Contra Costa 10.8 10.8
County Del Norte 16.8 10.8
County El Dorado-Lake 16.8 10.8
County El Dorado- 16.8 10.8
County Fresno 16.8 10.8
County Glenn 16.8 10.8
County Humboldt 16.8 10.8
County Imperial 10.2 7.3
County Inyo 16.8 10.8
County Kern-Mojave 16.8 10.8
County Kern-San 16.8 10.8
County Kings 16.8 10.8
County Lake 16.8 10.8
County Lassen 16.8 10.8
County Los Angeles- 16.8 10.8
County Los Angeles- 19.8 14.7
County Madera 16.8 10.8
County Marin 10.8 10.8
County Mariposa 16.8 10.8
County Mendocino- 16.8 10.8
County Mendocino- 16.8 10.8
County Mendocino- 16.8 10.8
County Mendocino- 16.8 10.8
County Merced 16.8 10.8
County Modoc 16.8 10.8
County Mono 16.8 10.8
County Monterey 16.8 10.8
County Napa 10.8 10.8
47 County Nevada 16.8 10.8
County Orange 19.8 14.7
County Placer-Lake 16.8 10.8
County Placer-Mountain 16.8 10.8
County Placer- 16.8 10.8
County Plumas 16.8 10.8
County Riverside- 16.8 10.8
County Riverside-
19.8 14.7
County Riverside-Salton 14.6 11
County Riverside-South 19.8 14.7
County Sacramento 15 10
County San Benito 16.8 10.8
County San Bernardino- 16.8 10.8
County San Bernardino- 19.8 14.7
County San Diego 16.8 10.8
County San Francisco 10.8 10.8
County San Joaquin 16.8 10.8
County San Luis Obispo 13 13
County San Mateo 10.8 10.8
County Santa Barbara-
8.3 8.3
County Santa Barbara-
8.3 8.3
County Santa Clara 10.8 10.8
County Santa Cruz 16.8 10.8
County Shasta 16.8 10.8
County Sierra 16.8 10.8
County Siskiyou 16.8 10.8
County Solano- 15 10
County Solano-San 16.8 10.8
County Sonoma-North 16.8 10.8
County Sonoma-San 10.8 10.8
County Stanislaus 16.8 10.8
County Sutter 16.8 10.8
County Tehama 16.8 10.8
County Trinity 16.8 10.8
County Tulare 16.8 10.8
County Tuolumne 16.8 10.8
County Ventura 16.8 10.8
County Yolo 15 10
County Yuba 16.8 10.8
Statewide Statewide 16.8 10.8
48 Air Basin Rural (miles) Urban (miles)
Great Basin Valleys 16.8 10.8
Lake County 16.8 10.8
Lake Tahoe 16.8 10.8
Mojave Desert 16.8 10.8
Mountain Counties 16.8 10.8
North Central Coast 17.1 12.3
North Coast 16.8 10.8
Northeast Plateau 16.8 10.8
Sacramento Valley 16.8 10.8
Salton Sea 14.6 11
San Diego 16.8 10.8
San Francisco Bay Area 10.8 10.8
San Joaquin Valley 16.8 10.8
South Central Coast 16.8 10.8
South Coast 19.8 14.7
Average 16.47 11.17
Mininum 10.80 10.80
Maximum 19.80 14.70
Range 9.00 3.90
Worker Trip Length by Air Basin
49 1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 45.00 1000sqft 1.03 45,000.00 0 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 36.00 1000sqft 0.83 36,000.00 0 Hotel 50.00 Room 1.67 72,600.00 0
Quality Restaurant 8.00 1000sqft 0.18 8,000.00 0
Apartments Low Rise 25.00 Dwelling Unit 1.56 25,000.00 72 Apartments Mid Rise 975.00 Dwelling Unit 25.66 975,000.00 2789 Regional Shopping Center 56.00 1000sqft 1.29 56,000.00 0
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
9 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 33
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
Operational Year 2028
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
702.44 CH4 Intensity 0.029
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.006
(lb/MWhr)
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed)
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual Attachment B
50 I I I I I • I I I • I I I
------------------------------~-------------------------------1---------------l------------------i--------------- • I I I • I I I ------------------------------~-------------------------------1---------------I------------------~--------------- • I I I • I I I ------------------------------~-------------------------------1---------------l------------------i--------------- • I I I • I I I ------------------------------~-------------------------------1---------------I------------------~--------------- • I I I • I I I ------------------------------~-------------------------------1---------------l------------------i--------------- ' I • I I I ------------------------------,1,--------------------------------I----------------~-----------------~--------------- Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model.
Land Use - See SWAPE comment regarding residential and retail land uses.
Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment regarding individual construction phase lengths.
Demolition - Consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding demolition.
Vehicle Trips - Saturday trips consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding weekday and Sunday trips.
Woodstoves - Woodstoves and wood-burning fireplaces consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding gas fireplaces.
Energy Use -
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on construction-related mitigation.
Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.
Water Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberWood 1.25 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberWood 48.75 0.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 7.16 6.17
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 6.39 3.87
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.46 1.39
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 158.37 79.82
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 3.75
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 94.36 63.99
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 49.97 10.74
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 6.07 6.16
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.86 4.18
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.05 0.69
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 131.84 78.27
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 51 I I I
I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------~--------------------------
2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 3.20
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 72.16 57.65
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 25.24 6.39
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.59 5.83
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.65 4.13
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 11.03 6.41
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 127.15 65.80
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 3.84
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 89.95 62.64
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 42.70 9.43
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 1.25 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 48.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 1.25 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 48.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 3 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 52 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------I------------------------------~--------------------------
2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2021 0.1713 1.8242 1.1662 2.4000e0030.4169 0.0817 0.4986 0.1795 0.0754 0.2549 0.0000 213.1969 213.1969 0.0601 0.0000 214.6993 2022 0.6904 4.1142 6.1625 0.0189 1.3058 0.1201 1.4259 0.3460 0.1128 0.4588 0.0000 1,721.682 6 1,721.682
6 0.1294 0.0000 1,724.918
7 2023 0.6148 3.3649 5.6747 0.0178 1.1963 0.0996 1.2959 0.3203 0.0935 0.4138 0.0000 1,627.529 5 1,627.529
5 0.1185 0.0000 1,630.492
5 2024 4.1619 0.1335 0.2810 5.9000e0040.0325 6.4700e0030.0390 8.6300e0036.0400e0030.0147 0.0000 52.9078 52.9078 8.0200e0030.0000 53.1082 Maximum 4.1619 4.1142 6.1625 0.0189 1.3058 0.1201 1.4259 0.3460 0.1128 0.4588 0.0000 1,721.682 6 1,721.682
6 0.1294 0.0000 1,724.918
7 Unmitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 4 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 53 I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
I
2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2021 0.1713 1.8242 1.1662 2.4000e0030.4169 0.0817 0.4986 0.1795 0.0754 0.2549 0.0000 213.1967 213.1967 0.0601 0.0000 214.6991 2022 0.6904 4.1142 6.1625 0.0189 1.3058 0.1201 1.4259 0.3460 0.1128 0.4588 0.0000 1,721.682 3 1,721.682
3 0.1294 0.0000 1,724.918
3 2023 0.6148 3.3648 5.6747 0.0178 1.1963 0.0996 1.2959 0.3203 0.0935 0.4138 0.0000 1,627.529 1 1,627.529
1 0.1185 0.0000 1,630.492
1 2024 4.1619 0.1335 0.2810 5.9000e0040.0325 6.4700e0030.0390 8.6300e0036.0400e0030.0147 0.0000 52.9077 52.9077 8.0200e0030.0000 53.1082 Maximum 4.1619 4.1142 6.1625 0.0189 1.3058 0.1201 1.4259 0.3460 0.1128 0.4588 0.0000 1,721.682 3 1,721.682
3 0.1294 0.0000 1,724.918
3 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 9-1-2021 11-30-2021 1.4103 1.4103
2 12-1-2021 2-28-2022 1.3613 1.3613
3 3-1-2022 5-31-2022 1.1985 1.1985
4 6-1-2022 8-31-2022 1.1921 1.1921
5 9-1-2022 11-30-2022 1.1918 1.1918
6 12-1-2022 2-28-2023 1.0774 1.0774
7 3-1-2023 5-31-2023 1.0320 1.0320
8 6-1-2023 8-31-2023 1.0260 1.0260
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 54 I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6700e0030.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 0.0201 3.7400e003222.5835 Energy 0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e0030.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 3,896.073 2 3,896.073
2 0.1303 0.0468 3,913.283
3 Mobile 1.5857 7.9962 19.1834 0.0821 7.7979 0.0580 7.8559 2.0895 0.0539 2.1434 0.0000 7,620.498 6 7,620.498
6 0.3407 0.0000 7,629.016
2 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 207.8079 0.0000 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 29.1632 556.6420 585.8052 3.0183 0.0755 683.7567 Total 6.8692 9.5223 30.3407 0.0914 7.7979 0.2260 8.0240 2.0895 0.2219 2.3114 236.9712 12,294.18 07 12,531.15
19 15.7904 0.1260 12,963.47
51 Unmitigated Operational
9 9-1-2023 11-30-2023 1.0265 1.0265
10 12-1-2023 2-29-2024 2.8857 2.8857
11 3-1-2024 5-31-2024 1.6207 1.6207
Highest 2.8857 2.8857
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 6 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 55 ., ' ., ' I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I -------------------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------•--······-------~-------~-------~-------~------- ., ' ., ' I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I -------------------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------•--······-------~-------~-------~-------~------- ., ' ., ' I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I -------------------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------•--······-------~-------~-------~-------~------- ., ' ., ' I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I -------------------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------•--······-------~-------~-------~-------~------- ., ., ' ' ' '
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6700e0030.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 0.0201 3.7400e003222.5835 Energy 0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e0030.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 3,896.073 2 3,896.073
2 0.1303 0.0468 3,913.283
3 Mobile 1.5857 7.9962 19.1834 0.0821 7.7979 0.0580 7.8559 2.0895 0.0539 2.1434 0.0000 7,620.498 6 7,620.498
6 0.3407 0.0000 7,629.016
2 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 207.8079 0.0000 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 29.1632 556.6420 585.8052 3.0183 0.0755 683.7567 Total 6.8692 9.5223 30.3407 0.0914 7.7979 0.2260 8.0240 2.0895 0.2219 2.3114 236.9712 12,294.18 07 12,531.15
19 15.7904 0.1260 12,963.47
51 Mitigated Operational
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 56 I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 9/1/2021 10/12/2021 5 30
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 10/13/2021 11/9/2021 5 20 3 Grading Grading 11/10/2021 1/11/2022 5 45
4 Building Construction Building Construction 1/12/2022 12/12/2023 5 500 5 Paving Paving 12/13/2023 1/30/2024 5 35
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 1/31/2024 3/19/2024 5 35 OffRoad Equipment
Residential Indoor: 2,025,000; Residential Outdoor: 675,000; Non-Residential Indoor: 326,400; Non-Residential Outdoor: 108,800; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating ±sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 112.5
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 57 I ■ ■ I
-------1------------------------:-----------------------l------------~------------4--------~--------4------------------------- • ■ 1 I I I I ■ ■ 1 I I I I
-------1------------------------:-----------------------l------------~------------4--------~--------4------------------------- • ■ 1 I I I I ■ ■ 1 I I I I
-------1------------------------:-----------------------l------------~------------4--------~--------4------------------------- • ■ 1 I I I I ■ ■ 1 I I I I
-------1------------------------:-----------------------l------------~------------4--------~--------4------------------------- • ■ 1 I I I I ■ ■ 1 I I I I
-------l------------------------~----------------------4-------------1-------------I---------~--------~------------------------- Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 58 I I
I
I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
I
-------------1---------T--------------
1 I
------------ :1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
------------ •1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
---- ----- --- .1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
-------------1---------T--------------
1 I
------------ :1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
------------ •1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
---- ----- --- .1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
-------------1---------T--------------
1 I
------------ :1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
------------ •1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
---- ----- --- .1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
-------------1---------T--------------
1 I
------------ :1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
------------ •1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
---- ----- --- .1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
-------------1---------T--------------
1 I
I I I
----------------------------~---------------------------1------------------ ~ ------------1---------------~--------------
3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0496 0.0000 0.0496 7.5100e0030.0000 7.5100e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0475 0.4716 0.3235 5.8000e0040.0233 0.0233 0.0216 0.0216 0.0000 51.0012 51.0012 0.0144 0.0000 51.3601 Total 0.0475 0.4716 0.3235 5.8000e0040.0496 0.0233 0.0729 7.5100e0030.0216 0.0291 0.0000 51.0012 51.0012 0.0144 0.0000 51.3601 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 458.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 801.00 143.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 160.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 10 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 59 • I I I I I I I I I
• I I I I I I I I I ----------------:---------------~----------l----------~----------l-----------t----------~----------1--------------1----------~---------- • I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ----------------:---------------~----------l----------~----------l-----------t----------~----------1--------------1----------~---------- • I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ----------------:---------------~----------l----------~----------l-----------t----------~----------1--------------1----------~---------- • I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ----------------:---------------~----------l----------~----------l-----------t----------~----------1--------------1----------~---------- • I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ················~---------------l-----------~---------+---------~-----------l-----------~----------l---------------1-----------!-••·--·---- ■ ■
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -•-----•--•n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
I
3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 1.9300e0030.0634 0.0148 1.8000e0043.9400e0031.9000e0044.1300e0031.0800e0031.8000e0041.2600e0030.0000 17.4566 17.4566 1.2100e0030.0000 17.4869 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 9.7000e0047.5000e0048.5100e0032.0000e0052.4700e0032.0000e0052.4900e0036.5000e0042.0000e0056.7000e0040.0000 2.2251 2.2251 7.0000e0050.0000 2.2267 Total 2.9000e0030.0641 0.0233 2.0000e0046.4100e0032.1000e0046.6200e0031.7300e0032.0000e0041.9300e0030.0000 19.6816 19.6816 1.2800e0030.0000 19.7136 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0496 0.0000 0.0496 7.5100e0030.0000 7.5100e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0475 0.4716 0.3235 5.8000e0040.0233 0.0233 0.0216 0.0216 0.0000 51.0011 51.0011 0.0144 0.0000 51.3600 Total 0.0475 0.4716 0.3235 5.8000e0040.0496 0.0233 0.0729 7.5100e0030.0216 0.0291 0.0000 51.0011 51.0011 0.0144 0.0000 51.3600 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 11 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 60 I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
I
I
I
I
i
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
I
I
3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 1.9300e0030.0634 0.0148 1.8000e0043.9400e0031.9000e0044.1300e0031.0800e0031.8000e0041.2600e0030.0000 17.4566 17.4566 1.2100e0030.0000 17.4869 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 9.7000e0047.5000e0048.5100e0032.0000e0052.4700e0032.0000e0052.4900e0036.5000e0042.0000e0056.7000e0040.0000 2.2251 2.2251 7.0000e0050.0000 2.2267 Total 2.9000e0030.0641 0.0233 2.0000e0046.4100e0032.1000e0046.6200e0031.7300e0032.0000e0041.9300e0030.0000 19.6816 19.6816 1.2800e0030.0000 19.7136 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1807 0.0000 0.1807 0.0993 0.0000 0.0993 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0389 0.4050 0.2115 3.8000e0040.0204 0.0204 0.0188 0.0188 0.0000 33.4357 33.4357 0.0108 0.0000 33.7061 Total 0.0389 0.4050 0.2115 3.8000e0040.1807 0.0204 0.2011 0.0993 0.0188 0.1181 0.0000 33.4357 33.4357 0.0108 0.0000 33.7061 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 61 I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
I
I
I
'
' I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• .. ' •• I I I
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 7.7000e0046.0000e0046.8100e0032.0000e0051.9700e0032.0000e0051.9900e0035.2000e0041.0000e0055.4000e0040.0000 1.7801 1.7801 5.0000e0050.0000 1.7814 Total 7.7000e0046.0000e0046.8100e0032.0000e0051.9700e0032.0000e0051.9900e0035.2000e0041.0000e0055.4000e0040.0000 1.7801 1.7801 5.0000e0050.0000 1.7814 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1807 0.0000 0.1807 0.0993 0.0000 0.0993 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0389 0.4050 0.2115 3.8000e0040.0204 0.0204 0.0188 0.0188 0.0000 33.4357 33.4357 0.0108 0.0000 33.7060 Total 0.0389 0.4050 0.2115 3.8000e0040.1807 0.0204 0.2011 0.0993 0.0188 0.1181 0.0000 33.4357 33.4357 0.0108 0.0000 33.7060 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 13 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 62 I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
I
I
I
'
' I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
I
I
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 7.7000e0046.0000e0046.8100e0032.0000e0051.9700e0032.0000e0051.9900e0035.2000e0041.0000e0055.4000e0040.0000 1.7801 1.7801 5.0000e0050.0000 1.7814 Total 7.7000e0046.0000e0046.8100e0032.0000e0051.9700e0032.0000e0051.9900e0035.2000e0041.0000e0055.4000e0040.0000 1.7801 1.7801 5.0000e0050.0000 1.7814 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1741 0.0000 0.1741 0.0693 0.0000 0.0693 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0796 0.8816 0.5867 1.1800e0030.0377 0.0377 0.0347 0.0347 0.0000 103.5405 103.5405 0.0335 0.0000 104.3776 Total 0.0796 0.8816 0.5867 1.1800e0030.1741 0.0377 0.2118 0.0693 0.0347 0.1040 0.0000 103.5405 103.5405 0.0335 0.0000 104.3776 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 14 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 63 I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
I
I
I
'
' I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
I
I
3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.6400e0031.2700e0030.0144 4.0000e0054.1600e0033.0000e0054.2000e0031.1100e0033.0000e0051.1400e0030.0000 3.7579 3.7579 1.1000e0040.0000 3.7607 Total 1.6400e0031.2700e0030.0144 4.0000e0054.1600e0033.0000e0054.2000e0031.1100e0033.0000e0051.1400e0030.0000 3.7579 3.7579 1.1000e0040.0000 3.7607 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1741 0.0000 0.1741 0.0693 0.0000 0.0693 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0796 0.8816 0.5867 1.1800e0030.0377 0.0377 0.0347 0.0347 0.0000 103.5403 103.5403 0.0335 0.0000 104.3775 Total 0.0796 0.8816 0.5867 1.1800e0030.1741 0.0377 0.2118 0.0693 0.0347 0.1040 0.0000 103.5403 103.5403 0.0335 0.0000 104.3775 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 15 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 64 I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
I
I
I
'
' I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
I
I
3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.6400e0031.2700e0030.0144 4.0000e0054.1600e0033.0000e0054.2000e0031.1100e0033.0000e0051.1400e0030.0000 3.7579 3.7579 1.1000e0040.0000 3.7607 Total 1.6400e0031.2700e0030.0144 4.0000e0054.1600e0033.0000e0054.2000e0031.1100e0033.0000e0051.1400e0030.0000 3.7579 3.7579 1.1000e0040.0000 3.7607 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0807 0.0000 0.0807 0.0180 0.0000 0.0180 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0127 0.1360 0.1017 2.2000e0045.7200e0035.7200e0035.2600e0035.2600e0030.0000 19.0871 19.0871 6.1700e0030.0000 19.2414 Total 0.0127 0.1360 0.1017 2.2000e0040.0807 5.7200e0030.0865 0.0180 5.2600e0030.0233 0.0000 19.0871 19.0871 6.1700e0030.0000 19.2414 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 16 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 65 I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
I
I
I
'
' I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
I
I
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.8000e0042.1000e0042.4400e0031.0000e0057.7000e0041.0000e0057.7000e0042.0000e0041.0000e0052.1000e0040.0000 0.6679 0.6679 2.0000e0050.0000 0.6684 Total 2.8000e0042.1000e0042.4400e0031.0000e0057.7000e0041.0000e0057.7000e0042.0000e0041.0000e0052.1000e0040.0000 0.6679 0.6679 2.0000e0050.0000 0.6684 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0807 0.0000 0.0807 0.0180 0.0000 0.0180 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0127 0.1360 0.1017 2.2000e0045.7200e0035.7200e0035.2600e0035.2600e0030.0000 19.0871 19.0871 6.1700e0030.0000 19.2414 Total 0.0127 0.1360 0.1017 2.2000e0040.0807 5.7200e0030.0865 0.0180 5.2600e0030.0233 0.0000 19.0871 19.0871 6.1700e0030.0000 19.2414 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 66 I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
I
I
I
'
' I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
I
I
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.8000e0042.1000e0042.4400e0031.0000e0057.7000e0041.0000e0057.7000e0042.0000e0041.0000e0052.1000e0040.0000 0.6679 0.6679 2.0000e0050.0000 0.6684 Total 2.8000e0042.1000e0042.4400e0031.0000e0057.7000e0041.0000e0057.7000e0042.0000e0041.0000e0052.1000e0040.0000 0.6679 0.6679 2.0000e0050.0000 0.6684 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.2158 1.9754 2.0700 3.4100e0030.1023 0.1023 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 293.1324 293.1324 0.0702 0.0000 294.8881 Total 0.2158 1.9754 2.0700 3.4100e0030.1023 0.1023 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 293.1324 293.1324 0.0702 0.0000 294.8881 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 67 I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• - I I I I I I I
- I I I I I I I
- I I I I I I I
- I I I I I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I I '
' II I
I
I
I
I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0527 1.6961 0.4580 4.5500e0030.1140 3.1800e0030.1171 0.0329 3.0400e0030.0359 0.0000 441.9835 441.9835 0.0264 0.0000 442.6435 Worker 0.4088 0.3066 3.5305 0.0107 1.1103 8.8700e0031.1192 0.2949 8.1700e0030.3031 0.0000 966.8117 966.8117 0.0266 0.0000 967.4773 Total 0.4616 2.0027 3.9885 0.0152 1.2243 0.0121 1.2363 0.3278 0.0112 0.3390 0.0000 1,408.795 2 1,408.795
2 0.0530 0.0000 1,410.120
8 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.2158 1.9754 2.0700 3.4100e0030.1023 0.1023 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 293.1321 293.1321 0.0702 0.0000 294.8877 Total 0.2158 1.9754 2.0700 3.4100e0030.1023 0.1023 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 293.1321 293.1321 0.0702 0.0000 294.8877 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 68 ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' II I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• --
' ' ' '
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0527 1.6961 0.4580 4.5500e0030.1140 3.1800e0030.1171 0.0329 3.0400e0030.0359 0.0000 441.9835 441.9835 0.0264 0.0000 442.6435 Worker 0.4088 0.3066 3.5305 0.0107 1.1103 8.8700e0031.1192 0.2949 8.1700e0030.3031 0.0000 966.8117 966.8117 0.0266 0.0000 967.4773 Total 0.4616 2.0027 3.9885 0.0152 1.2243 0.0121 1.2363 0.3278 0.0112 0.3390 0.0000 1,408.795 2 1,408.795
2 0.0530 0.0000 1,410.120
8 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1942 1.7765 2.0061 3.3300e0030.0864 0.0864 0.0813 0.0813 0.0000 286.2789 286.2789 0.0681 0.0000 287.9814 Total 0.1942 1.7765 2.0061 3.3300e0030.0864 0.0864 0.0813 0.0813 0.0000 286.2789 286.2789 0.0681 0.0000 287.9814 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 69 ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' II I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• --
' ' ' '
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0382 1.2511 0.4011 4.3000e0030.1113 1.4600e0030.1127 0.0321 1.4000e0030.0335 0.0000 417.9930 417.9930 0.0228 0.0000 418.5624 Worker 0.3753 0.2708 3.1696 0.0101 1.0840 8.4100e0031.0924 0.2879 7.7400e0030.2957 0.0000 909.3439 909.3439 0.0234 0.0000 909.9291 Total 0.4135 1.5218 3.5707 0.0144 1.1953 9.8700e0031.2051 0.3200 9.1400e0030.3292 0.0000 1,327.336 9 1,327.336
9 0.0462 0.0000 1,328.491
6 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1942 1.7765 2.0061 3.3300e0030.0864 0.0864 0.0813 0.0813 0.0000 286.2785 286.2785 0.0681 0.0000 287.9811 Total 0.1942 1.7765 2.0061 3.3300e0030.0864 0.0864 0.0813 0.0813 0.0000 286.2785 286.2785 0.0681 0.0000 287.9811 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 70 ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' II I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• --
' ' ' '
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0382 1.2511 0.4011 4.3000e0030.1113 1.4600e0030.1127 0.0321 1.4000e0030.0335 0.0000 417.9930 417.9930 0.0228 0.0000 418.5624 Worker 0.3753 0.2708 3.1696 0.0101 1.0840 8.4100e0031.0924 0.2879 7.7400e0030.2957 0.0000 909.3439 909.3439 0.0234 0.0000 909.9291 Total 0.4135 1.5218 3.5707 0.0144 1.1953 9.8700e0031.2051 0.3200 9.1400e0030.3292 0.0000 1,327.336 9 1,327.336
9 0.0462 0.0000 1,328.491
6 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 6.7100e0030.0663 0.0948 1.5000e0043.3200e0033.3200e0033.0500e0033.0500e0030.0000 13.0175 13.0175 4.2100e0030.0000 13.1227 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 6.7100e0030.0663 0.0948 1.5000e0043.3200e0033.3200e0033.0500e0033.0500e0030.0000 13.0175 13.0175 4.2100e0030.0000 13.1227 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 71 ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
' ' ' '
i
' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
' '
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 3.7000e0042.7000e0043.1200e0031.0000e0051.0700e0031.0000e0051.0800e0032.8000e0041.0000e0052.9000e0040.0000 0.8963 0.8963 2.0000e0050.0000 0.8968 Total 3.7000e0042.7000e0043.1200e0031.0000e0051.0700e0031.0000e0051.0800e0032.8000e0041.0000e0052.9000e0040.0000 0.8963 0.8963 2.0000e0050.0000 0.8968 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 6.7100e0030.0663 0.0948 1.5000e0043.3200e0033.3200e0033.0500e0033.0500e0030.0000 13.0175 13.0175 4.2100e0030.0000 13.1227 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 6.7100e0030.0663 0.0948 1.5000e0043.3200e0033.3200e0033.0500e0033.0500e0030.0000 13.0175 13.0175 4.2100e0030.0000 13.1227 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 23 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 72 ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
' ' ' '
i
' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
' '
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 3.7000e0042.7000e0043.1200e0031.0000e0051.0700e0031.0000e0051.0800e0032.8000e0041.0000e0052.9000e0040.0000 0.8963 0.8963 2.0000e0050.0000 0.8968 Total 3.7000e0042.7000e0043.1200e0031.0000e0051.0700e0031.0000e0051.0800e0032.8000e0041.0000e0052.9000e0040.0000 0.8963 0.8963 2.0000e0050.0000 0.8968 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0109 0.1048 0.1609 2.5000e0045.1500e0035.1500e0034.7400e0034.7400e0030.0000 22.0292 22.0292 7.1200e0030.0000 22.2073 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0109 0.1048 0.1609 2.5000e0045.1500e0035.1500e0034.7400e0034.7400e0030.0000 22.0292 22.0292 7.1200e0030.0000 22.2073 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 24 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 73 I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• •• I •• I I I
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.9000e0044.1000e0044.9200e0032.0000e0051.8100e0031.0000e0051.8200e0034.8000e0041.0000e0054.9000e0040.0000 1.4697 1.4697 4.0000e0050.0000 1.4706 Total 5.9000e0044.1000e0044.9200e0032.0000e0051.8100e0031.0000e0051.8200e0034.8000e0041.0000e0054.9000e0040.0000 1.4697 1.4697 4.0000e0050.0000 1.4706 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0109 0.1048 0.1609 2.5000e0045.1500e0035.1500e0034.7400e0034.7400e0030.0000 22.0292 22.0292 7.1200e0030.0000 22.2073 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0109 0.1048 0.1609 2.5000e0045.1500e0035.1500e0034.7400e0034.7400e0030.0000 22.0292 22.0292 7.1200e0030.0000 22.2073 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 25 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 74 ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
' ' ' '
i
' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
' '
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.9000e0044.1000e0044.9200e0032.0000e0051.8100e0031.0000e0051.8200e0034.8000e0041.0000e0054.9000e0040.0000 1.4697 1.4697 4.0000e0050.0000 1.4706 Total 5.9000e0044.1000e0044.9200e0032.0000e0051.8100e0031.0000e0051.8200e0034.8000e0041.0000e0054.9000e0040.0000 1.4697 1.4697 4.0000e0050.0000 1.4706 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 4.1372 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1600e0030.0213 0.0317 5.0000e0051.0700e0031.0700e0031.0700e0031.0700e0030.0000 4.4682 4.4682 2.5000e0040.0000 4.4745 Total 4.1404 0.0213 0.0317 5.0000e0051.0700e0031.0700e0031.0700e0031.0700e0030.0000 4.4682 4.4682 2.5000e0040.0000 4.4745 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 26 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 75 I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
I
I
I
'
i
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
I
I
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0101 6.9900e0030.0835 2.8000e0040.0307 2.3000e0040.0309 8.1500e0032.2000e0048.3700e0030.0000 24.9407 24.9407 6.1000e0040.0000 24.9558 Total 0.0101 6.9900e0030.0835 2.8000e0040.0307 2.3000e0040.0309 8.1500e0032.2000e0048.3700e0030.0000 24.9407 24.9407 6.1000e0040.0000 24.9558 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 4.1372 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1600e0030.0213 0.0317 5.0000e0051.0700e0031.0700e0031.0700e0031.0700e0030.0000 4.4682 4.4682 2.5000e0040.0000 4.4745 Total 4.1404 0.0213 0.0317 5.0000e0051.0700e0031.0700e0031.0700e0031.0700e0030.0000 4.4682 4.4682 2.5000e0040.0000 4.4745 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 27 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 76 ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
' ' ' '
i
' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
' '
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0101 6.9900e0030.0835 2.8000e0040.0307 2.3000e0040.0309 8.1500e0032.2000e0048.3700e0030.0000 24.9407 24.9407 6.1000e0040.0000 24.9558 Total 0.0101 6.9900e0030.0835 2.8000e0040.0307 2.3000e0040.0309 8.1500e0032.2000e0048.3700e0030.0000 24.9407 24.9407 6.1000e0040.0000 24.9558 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 28 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 77 I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I ' ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 1.5857 7.9962 19.1834 0.0821 7.7979 0.0580 7.8559 2.0895 0.0539 2.1434 0.0000 7,620.498 6 7,620.498
6 0.3407 0.0000 7,629.016
2 Unmitigated 1.5857 7.9962 19.1834 0.0821 7.7979 0.0580 7.8559 2.0895 0.0539 2.1434 0.0000 7,620.498 6 7,620.498
6 0.3407 0.0000 7,629.016
2 4.2 Trip Summary Information
4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Apartments Low Rise 145.75 154.25 154.00 506,227 506,227 Apartments Mid Rise 4,026.75 3,773.25 4075.50 13,660,065 13,660,065 General Office Building 288.45 62.55 31.05 706,812 706,812 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 2,368.80 2,873.52 2817.72 3,413,937 3,413,937 Hotel 192.00 187.50 160.00 445,703 445,703
Quality Restaurant 501.12 511.92 461.20 707,488 707,488 Regional Shopping Center 528.08 601.44 357.84 1,112,221 1,112,221 Total 8,050.95 8,164.43 8,057.31 20,552,452 20,552,452
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 29 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 78 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
:: : : : : : : : : : i : : : : : I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -----------.r--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------· -------~-------,--------,--------,--------,, ------- .. ..
..
..
I I
I I •
····································~--------------~-----------t-----------4------------------------ -------------------------- • I I • ····································~--------------~-----------t-----------4------------------------ -------------------------- • I I • ····································~--------------~-----------t-----------4------------------------ -------------------------- • I I • ····································~--------------~-----------t-----------~------------------------ -------------------------- • I I • ····································~--------------~-----------t-----------~------------------------ -------------------------- • I I • ····································~--------------~-----------t-----------~------------------------ -------------------------- : I I • I I
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments Low Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 General Office Building 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 19 4 High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)
16.60 8.40 6.90 8.50 72.50 19.00 37 20 43
Hotel 16.60 8.40 6.90 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38 4
Quality Restaurant 16.60 8.40 6.90 12.00 69.00 19.00 38 18 44 Regional Shopping Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.30 64.70 19.00 54 35 11
5.0 Energy Detail
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Low Rise 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Apartments Mid Rise 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 General Office Building 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)
0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Hotel 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Quality Restaurant 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Regional Shopping Center 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 30 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 79 I I I I I I
i • I I ■ I I ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■r----------~---------T••••••••••T--------~•••••••••r••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••r••••••••••••••••• ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
•
•
r----------~---------T••••••••••T--------~•••••••••r•••••••••••••••••••••••r••••••••••r••••••••••••••••• I
I
I
I •
• I
I
I
I ••• •••
I I I ■ I I ■ ■ ■
I I I ■ I I ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■r----------~---------T••••••••••T--------~•••••••••r•••••••••••r•••••••••••r••••••••••r••••••••••••••••• I I I ■ I I ■ ■ ■
• I I • I I • ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■r----------~---------T••••••••••T--------~•••••••••r•••••••••••r•••••••••••r••••••••••r••••••••••••••••• I I I ■ I I ■ ■ ■
I I I ■ I I ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■r----------~---------T••••••••••T--------~•--•-----r•••--••••--••••--••••--•--••••--••r••••--••••--••••- 1 I I • I I ■ ■ • • I I • I I ■
• • • ■ • • ■ • ■ • • ■ ■ • • • • ■ ■ • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • .. • • • • • • • • • T • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • -,. • • • • • • • • •r • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • r • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • I I
-------~------- -------- -------- -------- -------- ~------- ~------- ~------- -------- -------- -------- ------- -------~------- -------- ~------- ~------- ~------- ~------- ~------- ~------- -------- -------- -------- ------- . -------,-------- -----------------------+-------~------+,,-----~,,-----i-----+,,-------11""""----+,,-----1----- 1-----+,,-------11""""-----➔------- • • I I I I I I I I I I -----------------------~-------4--------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+------- • • I I I I I I I I I I • • I I I I I I I I I I -----------------------~-------4--------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+------- ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2,512.646
5 2,512.646
5 0.1037 0.0215 2,521.635
6 Electricity
Unmitigated
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2,512.646
5 2,512.646
5 0.1037 0.0215 2,521.635
6 NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e0030.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 1,383.426 7 1,383.426
7 0.0265 0.0254 1,391.647
8 NaturalGas
Unmitigated
0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e0030.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 1,383.426 7 1,383.426
7 0.0265 0.0254 1,391.647
8 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 31 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 80 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
.. ' •• I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• .. ' •• I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
-----------.r--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------· -------~-------,--------,--------,--------,, ------- .. ..
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
408494 2.2000e0030.0188 8.0100e0031.2000e0041.5200e0031.5200e0031.5200e0031.5200e0030.0000 21.7988 21.7988 4.2000e0044.0000e00421.9284 Apartments Mid
Rise
1.30613e
+007
0.0704 0.6018 0.2561 3.8400e0030.0487 0.0487 0.0487 0.0487 0.0000 696.9989 696.9989 0.0134 0.0128 701.1408 General Office
Building
468450 2.5300e0030.0230 0.0193 1.4000e0041.7500e0031.7500e0031.7500e0031.7500e0030.0000 24.9983 24.9983 4.8000e0044.6000e00425.1468 High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
8.30736e
+006
0.0448 0.4072 0.3421 2.4400e0030.0310 0.0310 0.0310 0.0310 0.0000 443.3124 443.3124 8.5000e0038.1300e003445.9468 Hotel 1.74095e
+006
9.3900e0030.0853 0.0717 5.1000e0046.4900e0036.4900e0036.4900e0036.4900e0030.0000 92.9036 92.9036 1.7800e0031.7000e00393.4557 Quality
Restaurant
1.84608e
+006
9.9500e0030.0905 0.0760 5.4000e0046.8800e0036.8800e0036.8800e0036.8800e0030.0000 98.5139 98.5139 1.8900e0031.8100e00399.0993 Regional
Shopping Center
91840 5.0000e0044.5000e0033.7800e0033.0000e0053.4000e0043.4000e0043.4000e0043.4000e0040.0000 4.9009 4.9009 9.0000e0059.0000e0054.9301 Total 0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e0030.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 1,383.426 8 1,383.426
8 0.0265 0.0254 1,391.647
8 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 32 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 81 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 • I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I, I
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
408494 2.2000e0030.0188 8.0100e0031.2000e0041.5200e0031.5200e0031.5200e0031.5200e0030.0000 21.7988 21.7988 4.2000e0044.0000e00421.9284 Apartments Mid
Rise
1.30613e
+007
0.0704 0.6018 0.2561 3.8400e0030.0487 0.0487 0.0487 0.0487 0.0000 696.9989 696.9989 0.0134 0.0128 701.1408 General Office
Building
468450 2.5300e0030.0230 0.0193 1.4000e0041.7500e0031.7500e0031.7500e0031.7500e0030.0000 24.9983 24.9983 4.8000e0044.6000e00425.1468 High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
8.30736e
+006
0.0448 0.4072 0.3421 2.4400e0030.0310 0.0310 0.0310 0.0310 0.0000 443.3124 443.3124 8.5000e0038.1300e003445.9468 Hotel 1.74095e
+006
9.3900e0030.0853 0.0717 5.1000e0046.4900e0036.4900e0036.4900e0036.4900e0030.0000 92.9036 92.9036 1.7800e0031.7000e00393.4557 Quality
Restaurant
1.84608e
+006
9.9500e0030.0905 0.0760 5.4000e0046.8800e0036.8800e0036.8800e0036.8800e0030.0000 98.5139 98.5139 1.8900e0031.8100e00399.0993 Regional
Shopping Center
91840 5.0000e0044.5000e0033.7800e0033.0000e0053.4000e0043.4000e0043.4000e0043.4000e0040.0000 4.9009 4.9009 9.0000e0059.0000e0054.9301 Total 0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e0030.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 1,383.426 8 1,383.426
8 0.0265 0.0254 1,391.647
8 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 33 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 82 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 • I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I &1 '
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
106010 33.7770 1.3900e0032.9000e00433.8978
Apartments Mid
Rise
3.94697e
+006
1,257.587
9 0.0519 0.0107 1,262.086
9 General Office
Building
584550 186.2502 7.6900e0031.5900e003186.9165
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
1.58904e
+006
506.3022 0.0209 4.3200e003508.1135
Hotel 550308 175.3399 7.2400e0031.5000e003175.9672
Quality
Restaurant
353120 112.5116 4.6500e0039.6000e004112.9141
Regional
Shopping Center
756000 240.8778 9.9400e0032.0600e003241.7395
Total 2,512.646
5 0.1037 0.0215 2,521.635
6 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 34 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 83 L
L
L I 11 I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------T••••••• L
L
L I 11 I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------T••••••• L
L
L I 11 I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------T••••••• L
L
L I 11 I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------T••••••• L
L
L I 11 I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------T••••••• L
L
L I 11 I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------T••••••• L
L
L
L
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
6.0 Area Detail
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
106010 33.7770 1.3900e0032.9000e00433.8978
Apartments Mid
Rise
3.94697e
+006
1,257.587
9 0.0519 0.0107 1,262.086
9 General Office
Building
584550 186.2502 7.6900e0031.5900e003186.9165
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
1.58904e
+006
506.3022 0.0209 4.3200e003508.1135
Hotel 550308 175.3399 7.2400e0031.5000e003175.9672
Quality
Restaurant
353120 112.5116 4.6500e0039.6000e004112.9141
Regional
Shopping Center
756000 240.8778 9.9400e0032.0600e003241.7395
Total 2,512.646
5 0.1037 0.0215 2,521.635
6 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 35 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 84 L
L
L I 11 I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------T••••••• L
L
L I 11 I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------T••••••• L
L
L I 11 I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------T••••••• L
L
L I 11 I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------T••••••• L
L
L I 11 I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------T••••••• L
L
L I 11 I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------T••••••• L
L
L
L
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6700e0030.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 0.0201 3.7400e003222.5835 Unmitigated 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6700e0030.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 0.0201 3.7400e003222.5835
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating
0.4137 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products
4.3998 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0206 0.1763 0.0750 1.1200e0030.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0000 204.1166 204.1166 3.9100e0033.7400e003205.3295 Landscaping 0.3096 0.1187 10.3054 5.4000e0040.0572 0.0572 0.0572 0.0572 0.0000 16.8504 16.8504 0.0161 0.0000 17.2540 Total 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6600e0030.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 0.0201 3.7400e003222.5835 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 36 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 85 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - - ~-------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------· - - - - - - -r--------,--------,--------,--------r - - - - - - - ., .,
.,
.,
' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••--------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••--------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••--------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' ' '
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
7.0 Water Detail
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating
0.4137 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products
4.3998 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0206 0.1763 0.0750 1.1200e0030.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0000 204.1166 204.1166 3.9100e0033.7400e003205.3295 Landscaping 0.3096 0.1187 10.3054 5.4000e0040.0572 0.0572 0.0572 0.0572 0.0000 16.8504 16.8504 0.0161 0.0000 17.2540 Total 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6600e0030.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 0.0201 3.7400e003222.5835 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 37 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 86 I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
'
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 585.8052 3.0183 0.0755 683.7567
Unmitigated 585.8052 3.0183 0.0755 683.7567
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 38 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 87 .,
.,
I I I
I I I I
-----------~-------,--------,--------r ------- .,
.,
7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
1.62885 /
1.02688
10.9095 0.0535 1.3400e00312.6471
Apartments Mid
Rise
63.5252 /
40.0485
425.4719 2.0867 0.0523 493.2363
General Office
Building
7.99802 /
4.90201
53.0719 0.2627 6.5900e00361.6019
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
10.9272 /
0.697482
51.2702 0.3580 8.8200e00362.8482
Hotel 1.26834 /
0.140927
6.1633 0.0416 1.0300e0037.5079
Quality
Restaurant
2.42827 /
0.154996
11.3934 0.0796 1.9600e00313.9663
Regional
Shopping Center
4.14806 /
2.54236
27.5250 0.1363 3.4200e00331.9490
Total 585.8052 3.0183 0.0755 683.7567
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 39 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 88 1,
1,
1, I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • r- - - - - - - .. ,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • 1, 1,
1, I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • r- - - - - - - .. ,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • 1, 1,
1, I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • r- - - - - - - .. ,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • 1, 1,
1, I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • r- - - - - - - .. ,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • 1, 1,
1, I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • r- - - - - - - .. ,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • 1, 1,
1, I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • r- - - - - - - .. ,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • 1, 1,
1,
I,
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
1.62885 /
1.02688
10.9095 0.0535 1.3400e00312.6471
Apartments Mid
Rise
63.5252 /
40.0485
425.4719 2.0867 0.0523 493.2363
General Office
Building
7.99802 /
4.90201
53.0719 0.2627 6.5900e00361.6019
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
10.9272 /
0.697482
51.2702 0.3580 8.8200e00362.8482
Hotel 1.26834 /
0.140927
6.1633 0.0416 1.0300e0037.5079
Quality
Restaurant
2.42827 /
0.154996
11.3934 0.0796 1.9600e00313.9663
Regional
Shopping Center
4.14806 /
2.54236
27.5250 0.1363 3.4200e00331.9490
Total 585.8052 3.0183 0.0755 683.7567
Mitigated
8.0 Waste Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 40 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 89 1,
1,
1, I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • r- - - - - - - .. ,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • 1, 1,
1, I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • r- - - - - - - .. ,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • 1, 1,
1, I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • r- - - - - - - .. ,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • 1, 1,
1, I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • r- - - - - - - .. ,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • 1, 1,
1, I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • r- - - - - - - .. ,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • 1, 1,
1, I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • r- - - - - - - .. ,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • 1, 1,
1,
I,
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354
Unmitigated 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 41 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 90 .,
.,
I I I
I I I I
-----------~-------,--------,--------r ------- .,
.,
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
11.5 2.3344 0.1380 0.0000 5.7834
Apartments Mid
Rise
448.5 91.0415 5.3804 0.0000 225.5513
General Office
Building
41.85 8.4952 0.5021 0.0000 21.0464
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
428.4 86.9613 5.1393 0.0000 215.4430
Hotel 27.38 5.5579 0.3285 0.0000 13.7694
Quality
Restaurant
7.3 1.4818 0.0876 0.0000 3.6712
Regional
Shopping Center
58.8 11.9359 0.7054 0.0000 29.5706
Total 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 42 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 91 1,
1,
1, I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • r- - - - - - - .. ,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • 1, 1,
1, I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • r- - - - - - - .. ,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • 1, 1,
1, I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • r- - - - - - - .. ,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • 1, 1,
1, I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • r- - - - - - - .. ,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • 1, 1,
1, I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • r- - - - - - - .. ,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • 1, 1,
1, I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • r- - - - - - - .. ,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • 1, 1,
1,
I,
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
11.5 2.3344 0.1380 0.0000 5.7834
Apartments Mid
Rise
448.5 91.0415 5.3804 0.0000 225.5513
General Office
Building
41.85 8.4952 0.5021 0.0000 21.0464
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
428.4 86.9613 5.1393 0.0000 215.4430
Hotel 27.38 5.5579 0.3285 0.0000 13.7694
Quality
Restaurant
7.3 1.4818 0.0876 0.0000 3.6712
Regional
Shopping Center
58.8 11.9359 0.7054 0.0000 29.5706
Total 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354
Mitigated
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 43 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 92 1,
1,
1, I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • r- - - - - - - .. ,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • 1, 1,
1, I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • r- - - - - - - .. ,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • 1, 1,
1, I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • r- - - - - - - .. ,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • 1, 1,
1, I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • r- - - - - - - .. ,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • 1, 1,
1, I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • r- - - - - - - .. ,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • 1, 1,
1, I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • r- - - - - - - .. ,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • 1, 1,
1,
I,
11.0 Vegetation
Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 44 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 93 1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 45.00 1000sqft 1.03 45,000.00 0 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 36.00 1000sqft 0.83 36,000.00 0 Hotel 50.00 Room 1.67 72,600.00 0
Quality Restaurant 8.00 1000sqft 0.18 8,000.00 0
Apartments Low Rise 25.00 Dwelling Unit 1.56 25,000.00 72 Apartments Mid Rise 975.00 Dwelling Unit 25.66 975,000.00 2789 Regional Shopping Center 56.00 1000sqft 1.29 56,000.00 0
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
9 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 33
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
Operational Year 2028
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
702.44 CH4 Intensity 0.029
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.006
(lb/MWhr)
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed)
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 94 I I I I I • I I I • I I I
------------------------------~-------------------------------1---------------l------------------i--------------- • I I I • I I I ------------------------------~-------------------------------1---------------I------------------~--------------- • I I I • I I I ------------------------------~-------------------------------1---------------l------------------i--------------- • I I I • I I I ------------------------------~-------------------------------1---------------I------------------~--------------- • I I I • I I I ------------------------------~-------------------------------1---------------l------------------i--------------- ' I • I I I ------------------------------,1,--------------------------------I----------------~-----------------~--------------- Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model.
Land Use - See SWAPE comment regarding residential and retail land uses.
Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment regarding individual construction phase lengths.
Demolition - Consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding demolition.
Vehicle Trips - Saturday trips consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding weekday and Sunday trips.
Woodstoves - Woodstoves and wood-burning fireplaces consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding gas fireplaces.
Energy Use -
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on construction-related mitigation.
Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.
Water Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberWood 1.25 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberWood 48.75 0.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 7.16 6.17
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 6.39 3.87
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.46 1.39
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 158.37 79.82
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 3.75
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 94.36 63.99
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 49.97 10.74
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 6.07 6.16
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.86 4.18
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.05 0.69
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 131.84 78.27
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 95 I I I
I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------~--------------------------
2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 3.20
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 72.16 57.65
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 25.24 6.39
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.59 5.83
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.65 4.13
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 11.03 6.41
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 127.15 65.80
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 3.84
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 89.95 62.64
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 42.70 9.43
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 1.25 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 48.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 1.25 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 48.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 3 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 96 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------I------------------------------~--------------------------
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2021 4.2769 46.4588 31.6840 0.0643 18.2675 2.0461 20.3135 9.9840 1.8824 11.8664 0.0000 6,234.797 4 6,234.797
4 1.9495 0.0000 6,283.535
2 2022 5.3304 38.8967 49.5629 0.1517 9.8688 1.6366 10.7727 3.6558 1.5057 5.1615 0.0000 15,251.56 74 15,251.56
74 1.9503 0.0000 15,278.52
88 2023 4.8957 26.3317 46.7567 0.1472 9.8688 0.7794 10.6482 2.6381 0.7322 3.3702 0.0000 14,807.52 69 14,807.52
69 1.0250 0.0000 14,833.15
21 2024 237.1630 9.5575 15.1043 0.0244 1.7884 0.4698 1.8628 0.4743 0.4322 0.5476 0.0000 2,361.398 9 2,361.398
9 0.7177 0.0000 2,379.342
1 Maximum 237.1630 46.4588 49.5629 0.1517 18.2675 2.0461 20.3135 9.9840 1.8824 11.8664 0.0000 15,251.56 74 15,251.56
74 1.9503 0.0000 15,278.52
88 Unmitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 4 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 97 I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
I
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2021 4.2769 46.4588 31.6840 0.0643 18.2675 2.0461 20.3135 9.9840 1.8824 11.8664 0.0000 6,234.797 4 6,234.797
4 1.9495 0.0000 6,283.535
2 2022 5.3304 38.8967 49.5629 0.1517 9.8688 1.6366 10.7727 3.6558 1.5057 5.1615 0.0000 15,251.56 74 15,251.56
74 1.9503 0.0000 15,278.52
88 2023 4.8957 26.3317 46.7567 0.1472 9.8688 0.7794 10.6482 2.6381 0.7322 3.3702 0.0000 14,807.52 69 14,807.52
69 1.0250 0.0000 14,833.15
20 2024 237.1630 9.5575 15.1043 0.0244 1.7884 0.4698 1.8628 0.4743 0.4322 0.5476 0.0000 2,361.398 9 2,361.398
9 0.7177 0.0000 2,379.342
1 Maximum 237.1630 46.4588 49.5629 0.1517 18.2675 2.0461 20.3135 9.9840 1.8824 11.8664 0.0000 15,251.56 74 15,251.56
74 1.9503 0.0000 15,278.52
88 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 98 I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
2.2 Overall Operational
Fugitive SO2 CO NOx ROG
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
CO2e N2O CH4 Total CO2 NBio- CO2 Bio- CO2
lb/day lb/day Category
18,148.59 0.0000 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0944 88.4430 15.0496 30.5020 Area 50 18,148.59
50 18,259.11 0.3300 0.4874
92 8,355.983 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.0418 4.2573 6.7462 0.7660 Energy 2 8,355.983
2 8,405.638 0.1532 0.1602
7 50,306.60 12.6070 0.3119 12.2950 46.2951 0.3360 45.9592 0.4917 114.8495 45.4304 9.8489 Mobile 34 50,306.60
34 50,361.12 2.1807
08 76,811.18 0.0000 14.7336 2.4385 12.2950 48.4217 2.4626 45.9592 0.6278 207.5497 67.2262 41.1168 Total 16 76,811.18
16 77,025.87 0.4832 2.8282
86 Unmitigated Operational
Fugitive SO2 CO NOx ROG
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
CO2e N2O CH4 Total CO2 NBio- CO2 Bio- CO2
lb/day lb/day Category
18,148.59 0.0000 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0944 88.4430 15.0496 30.5020 Area 50 18,148.59
50 18,259.11 0.3300 0.4874
92 8,355.983 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.0418 4.2573 6.7462 0.7660 Energy 2 8,355.983
2 8,405.638 0.1532 0.1602
7 50,306.60 12.6070 0.3119 12.2950 46.2951 0.3360 45.9592 0.4917 114.8495 45.4304 9.8489 Mobile 34 50,306.60
34 50,361.12 2.1807
08 76,811.18 0.0000 14.7336 2.4385 12.2950 48.4217 2.4626 45.9592 0.6278 207.5497 67.2262 41.1168 Total 16 76,811.18
16 77,025.87 0.4832 2.8282
86 Mitigated Operational
Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Page 6 of 35 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 99 r
r
r I I I I T I I I I I I I I I
,.
,.
••••••-~-------L-------L-------L-------•••••••••-------•-------L-------L-------L-------L-------L-------L-------L-------L-------•••••••••••• I I I I I ' I I I I I I I I I ■ I f ■
r I I I I T I I I I I I I I I
••••••-~-------L-------L-------L-------•••••••••-------•-------L-------L-------L-------L-------L-------L-------L-------L-------•••••••••••• I I I I I ' I I I I I I I I I ■ I f ■
r
'
r
r
r I I I I I ' I I I I I I I I I
•••••••~-------L-------L-------L-------•••••••••-------•-------L-------L-------L-------L-------L-------L-------L-------L-------•••••••••••• I : : : : i : : : : : : : : : ■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I ' I I I I I I I I I
•••••••~-------L-------L-------L-------•••••••••-------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------•----------- 1 I I I I ' I I I I I I I I I ■
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
r
'
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 9/1/2021 10/12/2021 5 30
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 10/13/2021 11/9/2021 5 20 3 Grading Grading 11/10/2021 1/11/2022 5 45
4 Building Construction Building Construction 1/12/2022 12/12/2023 5 500 5 Paving Paving 12/13/2023 1/30/2024 5 35
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 1/31/2024 3/19/2024 5 35 OffRoad Equipment
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 2,025,000; Residential Outdoor: 675,000; Non-Residential Indoor: 326,400; Non-Residential Outdoor: 108,800; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating ±sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 112.5
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 100
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I ■ ■ I I I I I
-------s----····················=-----------------------1------------~------------~--------~--------~------------------------- • ■ I I I I I ■ ■ I I I I I
•····••l••····················•·I-----------------------I------------~------------~--------~--------~---······················ ■ ■ I I I I I ■ ■ I I I I I
-------s----····················=-----------------------1------------~------------~--------~--------~------------------------- • ■ I I I I I ■ ■ I I I I I
-------s------------------------1-----------------------1------------~------------~--------~--------~------------------------- • ■ I I I I I ■ ■ I I I I I
-------s----····················~----------------------~-----------4-----------4--------~--------~------------------------- Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 101
I I
I
I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
I
-------------1---------T--------------
1 I
------------ :1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
------------ •1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
---- ----- --- .1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
-------------1---------T--------------
1 I
------------ :1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
------------ •1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
---- ----- --- .1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
-------------1---------T--------------
1 I
------------ :1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
------------ •1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
---- ----- --- .1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
-------------1---------T--------------
1 I
------------ :1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
------------ •1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
---- ----- --- .1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
-------------1---------T--------------
1 I
I I I
----------------------------~---------------------------1------------------ ~ ------------1---------------~--------------
3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 3.3074 0.0000 3.3074 0.5008 0.0000 0.5008 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 1.5513 1.5513 1.4411 1.4411 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 3.3074 1.5513 4.8588 0.5008 1.4411 1.9419 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 458.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 801.00 143.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 160.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 102
• I I I I I I I I I
• I I I I I I I I I ----------------:---------------~----------l----------~----------l-----------t----------~----------1--------------1----------~---------- • I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ----------------:---------------~----------l----------~----------l-----------t----------~----------1--------------1----------~---------- • I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ----------------:---------------~----------l----------~----------l-----------t----------~----------1--------------1----------~---------- • I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ----------------:---------------~----------l----------~----------l-----------t----------~----------1--------------1----------~---------- • I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ················~---------------l-----------~---------+---------~-----------l-----------~----------l---------------1-----------!-••·--·---- ■ ■
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -•-----•--•n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
I
3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.1273 4.0952 0.9602 0.0119 0.2669 0.0126 0.2795 0.0732 0.0120 0.0852 1,292.241 3 1,292.241
3 0.0877 1,294.433
7 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0643 0.0442 0.6042 1.7100e0030.1677 1.3500e0030.1690 0.0445 1.2500e0030.0457 170.8155 170.8155 5.0300e003170.9413 Total 0.1916 4.1394 1.5644 0.0136 0.4346 0.0139 0.4485 0.1176 0.0133 0.1309 1,463.056 8 1,463.056
8 0.0927 1,465.375
0 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 3.3074 0.0000 3.3074 0.5008 0.0000 0.5008 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 1.5513 1.5513 1.4411 1.4411 0.0000 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 3.3074 1.5513 4.8588 0.5008 1.4411 1.9419 0.0000 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 10 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 103
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
I
I
I
I
i
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
I
I
3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.1273 4.0952 0.9602 0.0119 0.2669 0.0126 0.2795 0.0732 0.0120 0.0852 1,292.241 3 1,292.241
3 0.0877 1,294.433
7 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0643 0.0442 0.6042 1.7100e0030.1677 1.3500e0030.1690 0.0445 1.2500e0030.0457 170.8155 170.8155 5.0300e003170.9413 Total 0.1916 4.1394 1.5644 0.0136 0.4346 0.0139 0.4485 0.1176 0.0133 0.1309 1,463.056 8 1,463.056
8 0.0927 1,465.375
0 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 2.0445 2.0445 1.8809 1.8809 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Total 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 18.0663 2.0445 20.1107 9.9307 1.8809 11.8116 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 11 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 104
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
I
I
I
I
i
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
I
I
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0772 0.0530 0.7250 2.0600e0030.2012 1.6300e0030.2028 0.0534 1.5000e0030.0549 204.9786 204.9786 6.0400e003205.1296 Total 0.0772 0.0530 0.7250 2.0600e0030.2012 1.6300e0030.2028 0.0534 1.5000e0030.0549 204.9786 204.9786 6.0400e003205.1296 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 2.0445 2.0445 1.8809 1.8809 0.0000 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Total 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 18.0663 2.0445 20.1107 9.9307 1.8809 11.8116 0.0000 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 105
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
I
I
I
'
' I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
I
I
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0772 0.0530 0.7250 2.0600e0030.2012 1.6300e0030.2028 0.0534 1.5000e0030.0549 204.9786 204.9786 6.0400e003205.1296 Total 0.0772 0.0530 0.7250 2.0600e0030.2012 1.6300e0030.2028 0.0534 1.5000e0030.0549 204.9786 204.9786 6.0400e003205.1296 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 1.9853 1.9853 1.8265 1.8265 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Total 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 8.6733 1.9853 10.6587 3.5965 1.8265 5.4230 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 13 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 106
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
I
I
I
'
' I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
I
I
3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0857 0.0589 0.8056 2.2900e0030.2236 1.8100e0030.2254 0.0593 1.6600e0030.0610 227.7540 227.7540 6.7100e003227.9217 Total 0.0857 0.0589 0.8056 2.2900e0030.2236 1.8100e0030.2254 0.0593 1.6600e0030.0610 227.7540 227.7540 6.7100e003227.9217 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 1.9853 1.9853 1.8265 1.8265 0.0000 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Total 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 8.6733 1.9853 10.6587 3.5965 1.8265 5.4230 0.0000 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 14 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 107
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
I
I
I
'
' I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
I
I
3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0857 0.0589 0.8056 2.2900e0030.2236 1.8100e0030.2254 0.0593 1.6600e0030.0610 227.7540 227.7540 6.7100e003227.9217 Total 0.0857 0.0589 0.8056 2.2900e0030.2236 1.8100e0030.2254 0.0593 1.6600e0030.0610 227.7540 227.7540 6.7100e003227.9217 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 8.6733 1.6349 10.3082 3.5965 1.5041 5.1006 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 15 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 108
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
I
I
I
'
' I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
I
I
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0803 0.0532 0.7432 2.2100e0030.2236 1.7500e0030.2253 0.0593 1.6100e0030.0609 219.7425 219.7425 6.0600e003219.8941 Total 0.0803 0.0532 0.7432 2.2100e0030.2236 1.7500e0030.2253 0.0593 1.6100e0030.0609 219.7425 219.7425 6.0600e003219.8941 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 0.0000 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 8.6733 1.6349 10.3082 3.5965 1.5041 5.1006 0.0000 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 16 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 109
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
I
I
I
'
' I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
I
I
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0803 0.0532 0.7432 2.2100e0030.2236 1.7500e0030.2253 0.0593 1.6100e0030.0609 219.7425 219.7425 6.0600e003219.8941 Total 0.0803 0.0532 0.7432 2.2100e0030.2236 1.7500e0030.2253 0.0593 1.6100e0030.0609 219.7425 219.7425 6.0600e003219.8941 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 110
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• - I I I I I I I
- I I I I I I I
- I I I I I I I
- I I I I I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I I '
' II I
I
I
I
I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.4079 13.2032 3.4341 0.0364 0.9155 0.0248 0.9404 0.2636 0.0237 0.2873 3,896.548 2 3,896.548
2 0.2236 3,902.138
4 Worker 3.2162 2.1318 29.7654 0.0883 8.9533 0.0701 9.0234 2.3745 0.0646 2.4390 8,800.685 7 8,800.685
7 0.2429 8,806.758
2 Total 3.6242 15.3350 33.1995 0.1247 9.8688 0.0949 9.9637 2.6381 0.0883 2.7263 12,697.23 39 12,697.23
39 0.4665 12,708.89
66 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 111
' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' II I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• --
' ' ' '
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.4079 13.2032 3.4341 0.0364 0.9155 0.0248 0.9404 0.2636 0.0237 0.2873 3,896.548 2 3,896.548
2 0.2236 3,902.138
4 Worker 3.2162 2.1318 29.7654 0.0883 8.9533 0.0701 9.0234 2.3745 0.0646 2.4390 8,800.685 7 8,800.685
7 0.2429 8,806.758
2 Total 3.6242 15.3350 33.1995 0.1247 9.8688 0.0949 9.9637 2.6381 0.0883 2.7263 12,697.23 39 12,697.23
39 0.4665 12,708.89
66 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 112
' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' II I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• --
' ' ' '
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.3027 10.0181 3.1014 0.0352 0.9156 0.0116 0.9271 0.2636 0.0111 0.2747 3,773.876 2 3,773.876
2 0.1982 3,778.830
0 Worker 3.0203 1.9287 27.4113 0.0851 8.9533 0.0681 9.0214 2.3745 0.0627 2.4372 8,478.440 8 8,478.440
8 0.2190 8,483.916
0 Total 3.3229 11.9468 30.5127 0.1203 9.8688 0.0797 9.9485 2.6381 0.0738 2.7118 12,252.31 70 12,252.31
70 0.4172 12,262.74
60 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 113
' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' II I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• --
' ' ' '
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.3027 10.0181 3.1014 0.0352 0.9156 0.0116 0.9271 0.2636 0.0111 0.2747 3,773.876 2 3,773.876
2 0.1982 3,778.830
0 Worker 3.0203 1.9287 27.4113 0.0851 8.9533 0.0681 9.0214 2.3745 0.0627 2.4372 8,478.440 8 8,478.440
8 0.2190 8,483.916
0 Total 3.3229 11.9468 30.5127 0.1203 9.8688 0.0797 9.9485 2.6381 0.0738 2.7118 12,252.31 70 12,252.31
70 0.4172 12,262.74
60 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 114
' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
' ' ' '
i
' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
' '
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0566 0.0361 0.5133 1.5900e0030.1677 1.2800e0030.1689 0.0445 1.1700e0030.0456 158.7723 158.7723 4.1000e003158.8748 Total 0.0566 0.0361 0.5133 1.5900e0030.1677 1.2800e0030.1689 0.0445 1.1700e0030.0456 158.7723 158.7723 4.1000e003158.8748 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 115
' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
' ' ' '
i
' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
' '
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0566 0.0361 0.5133 1.5900e0030.1677 1.2800e0030.1689 0.0445 1.1700e0030.0456 158.7723 158.7723 4.1000e003158.8748 Total 0.0566 0.0361 0.5133 1.5900e0030.1677 1.2800e0030.1689 0.0445 1.1700e0030.0456 158.7723 158.7723 4.1000e003158.8748 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 23 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 116
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• •• I •• I I I
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0535 0.0329 0.4785 1.5400e0030.1677 1.2600e0030.1689 0.0445 1.1600e0030.0456 153.8517 153.8517 3.7600e003153.9458 Total 0.0535 0.0329 0.4785 1.5400e0030.1677 1.2600e0030.1689 0.0445 1.1600e0030.0456 153.8517 153.8517 3.7600e003153.9458 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 24 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 117
' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
' ' ' '
i
' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
' '
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0535 0.0329 0.4785 1.5400e0030.1677 1.2600e0030.1689 0.0445 1.1600e0030.0456 153.8517 153.8517 3.7600e003153.9458 Total 0.0535 0.0329 0.4785 1.5400e0030.1677 1.2600e0030.1689 0.0445 1.1600e0030.0456 153.8517 153.8517 3.7600e003153.9458 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 236.4115 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 236.5923 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 25 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 118
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• •• I •• I I I
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.5707 0.3513 5.1044 0.0165 1.7884 0.0134 1.8018 0.4743 0.0123 0.4866 1,641.085 2 1,641.085
2 0.0401 1,642.088
6 Total 0.5707 0.3513 5.1044 0.0165 1.7884 0.0134 1.8018 0.4743 0.0123 0.4866 1,641.085 2 1,641.085
2 0.0401 1,642.088
6 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 236.4115 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 236.5923 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 26 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 119
' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
' ' ' '
i
' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
' '
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.5707 0.3513 5.1044 0.0165 1.7884 0.0134 1.8018 0.4743 0.0123 0.4866 1,641.085 2 1,641.085
2 0.0401 1,642.088
6 Total 0.5707 0.3513 5.1044 0.0165 1.7884 0.0134 1.8018 0.4743 0.0123 0.4866 1,641.085 2 1,641.085
2 0.0401 1,642.088
6 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 27 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 120
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I I
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 9.8489 45.4304 114.8495 0.4917 45.9592 0.3360 46.2951 12.2950 0.3119 12.6070 50,306.60 34 50,306.60
34 2.1807 50,361.12
08 Unmitigated 9.8489 45.4304 114.8495 0.4917 45.9592 0.3360 46.2951 12.2950 0.3119 12.6070 50,306.60 34 50,306.60
34 2.1807 50,361.12
08 4.2 Trip Summary Information
4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Apartments Low Rise 145.75 154.25 154.00 506,227 506,227 Apartments Mid Rise 4,026.75 3,773.25 4075.50 13,660,065 13,660,065 General Office Building 288.45 62.55 31.05 706,812 706,812 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 2,368.80 2,873.52 2817.72 3,413,937 3,413,937 Hotel 192.00 187.50 160.00 445,703 445,703
Quality Restaurant 501.12 511.92 461.20 707,488 707,488 Regional Shopping Center 528.08 601.44 357.84 1,112,221 1,112,221 Total 8,050.95 8,164.43 8,057.31 20,552,452 20,552,452
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 28 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 121
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
:: : : : : : : : : : i : : : : : I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -----------.r--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------· -------~-------,--------,--------,--------,, ------- .. ..
..
..
I I
I I •
····································~--------------~-----------t-----------4------------------------ -------------------------- • I I • ····································~--------------~-----------t-----------4------------------------ -------------------------- • I I • ····································~--------------~-----------t-----------4------------------------ -------------------------- • I I • ····································~--------------~-----------t-----------~------------------------ -------------------------- • I I • ····································~--------------~-----------t-----------~------------------------ -------------------------- • I I • ····································~--------------~-----------t-----------~------------------------ -------------------------- : I I • I I
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments Low Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 General Office Building 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 19 4 High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)
16.60 8.40 6.90 8.50 72.50 19.00 37 20 43
Hotel 16.60 8.40 6.90 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38 4
Quality Restaurant 16.60 8.40 6.90 12.00 69.00 19.00 38 18 44 Regional Shopping Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.30 64.70 19.00 54 35 11
5.0 Energy Detail
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Low Rise 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Apartments Mid Rise 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 General Office Building 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)
0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Hotel 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Quality Restaurant 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Regional Shopping Center 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 29 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 122
I I I I I I
i • I I ■ I I ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■r----------~---------T••••••••••T--------~•••••••••r••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••r••••••••••••••••• ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
•
•
r----------~---------T••••••••••T--------~•••••••••r•••••••••••••••••••••••r••••••••••r••••••••••••••••• I
I
I
I •
• I
I
I
I ••• •••
I I I ■ I I ■ ■ ■
I I I ■ I I ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■r----------~---------T••••••••••T--------~•••••••••r•••••••••••r•••••••••••r••••••••••r••••••••••••••••• I I I ■ I I ■ ■ ■
• I I • I I • ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■r----------~---------T••••••••••T--------~•••••••••r•••••••••••r•••••••••••r••••••••••r••••••••••••••••• I I I ■ I I ■ ■ ■
I I I ■ I I ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■r----------~---------T••••••••••T--------~•--•-----r•••--••••--••••--••••--•--••••--••r••••--••••--••••- 1 I I • I I ■ ■ • • I I • I I ■
• • • ■ • • ■ • ■ • • ■ ■ • • • • ■ ■ • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • .. • • • • • • • • • T • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • -,. • • • • • • • • •r • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • r • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • I I
-. --.. ----. -----. --. --. --. -.. -~------- -------- -------- -------- -------- ~------- ~------- ~------- -------- -------- -------- --. -.. - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...... ..;.-------· ---------· ---------· ---------· ---------· ---------· ---------· ,--------· ---------· ---------· ---------· ....... ' -• ----•• --•• -• --• --• --- -----• --=-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -----• - ·······················+·······~.-----+,,-----~,,-------11-----+,,-------11""""----+,,-----l----- l-----+,,-------11e--------1-••····· • • I I I I I I I I I I
....................... .;. ....... ..;.-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+------- ■ • I I I I I I I I I I • • I I I I I I I I I I ••••••••••••••••••••••• .;. ••••••• ..;.-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+------- ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 NaturalGas
Unmitigated
0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 30 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 123
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
-----------.r--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------· -------~-------,--------,--------,--------,, ------- .. ..
..
..
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Apartments Low
Rise
1119.16 0.0121 0.1031 0.0439 6.6000e0048.3400e0038.3400e0038.3400e0038.3400e003131.6662 131.6662 2.5200e0032.4100e003132.4486 Apartments Mid
Rise
35784.3 0.3859 3.2978 1.4033 0.0211 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 4,209.916 4 4,209.916
4 0.0807 0.0772 4,234.933
9 General Office
Building
1283.42 0.0138 0.1258 0.1057 7.5000e0049.5600e0039.5600e0039.5600e0039.5600e003150.9911 150.9911 2.8900e0032.7700e003151.8884 High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
22759.9 0.2455 2.2314 1.8743 0.0134 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 2,677.634 2 2,677.634
2 0.0513 0.0491 2,693.546
0 Hotel 4769.72 0.0514 0.4676 0.3928 2.8100e0030.0355 0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 561.1436 561.1436 0.0108 0.0103 564.4782 Quality
Restaurant
5057.75 0.0545 0.4959 0.4165 2.9800e0030.0377 0.0377 0.0377 0.0377 595.0298 595.0298 0.0114 0.0109 598.5658 Regional
Shopping Center
251.616 2.7100e0030.0247 0.0207 1.5000e0041.8700e0031.8700e0031.8700e0031.8700e00329.6019 29.6019 5.7000e0045.4000e00429.7778 Total 0.7660 6.7463 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 31 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 124
1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 • I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I, I
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
6.0 Area Detail
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Apartments Low
Rise
1.11916 0.0121 0.1031 0.0439 6.6000e0048.3400e0038.3400e0038.3400e0038.3400e003131.6662 131.6662 2.5200e0032.4100e003132.4486 Apartments Mid
Rise
35.7843 0.3859 3.2978 1.4033 0.0211 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 4,209.916 4 4,209.916
4 0.0807 0.0772 4,234.933
9 General Office
Building
1.28342 0.0138 0.1258 0.1057 7.5000e0049.5600e0039.5600e0039.5600e0039.5600e003150.9911 150.9911 2.8900e0032.7700e003151.8884 High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
22.7599 0.2455 2.2314 1.8743 0.0134 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 2,677.634 2 2,677.634
2 0.0513 0.0491 2,693.546
0 Hotel 4.76972 0.0514 0.4676 0.3928 2.8100e0030.0355 0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 561.1436 561.1436 0.0108 0.0103 564.4782 Quality
Restaurant
5.05775 0.0545 0.4959 0.4165 2.9800e0030.0377 0.0377 0.0377 0.0377 595.0298 595.0298 0.0114 0.0109 598.5658 Regional
Shopping Center
0.251616 2.7100e0030.0247 0.0207 1.5000e0041.8700e0031.8700e0031.8700e0031.8700e00329.6019 29.6019 5.7000e0045.4000e00429.7778 Total 0.7660 6.7463 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 32 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 125
1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 • I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I &1 '
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Unmitigated 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating
2.2670 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
24.1085 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 1.6500 14.1000 6.0000 0.0900 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 0.0000 18,000.00 00 18,000.00
00 0.3450 0.3300 18,106.96
50 Landscaping 2.4766 0.9496 82.4430 4.3600e0030.4574 0.4574 0.4574 0.4574 148.5950 148.5950 0.1424 152.1542 Total 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 33 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 126
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - - ~-------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------· - - - - - - -r--------,--------,--------,--------r - - - - - - - ., .,
.,
.,
' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••--------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••--------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••--------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' ' '
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
7.0 Water Detail
8.0 Waste Detail
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating
2.2670 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
24.1085 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 1.6500 14.1000 6.0000 0.0900 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 0.0000 18,000.00 00 18,000.00
00 0.3450 0.3300 18,106.96
50 Landscaping 2.4766 0.9496 82.4430 4.3600e0030.4574 0.4574 0.4574 0.4574 148.5950 148.5950 0.1424 152.1542 Total 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Mitigated
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 34 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 127
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
I
11.0 Vegetation
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 35 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 128
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 45.00 1000sqft 1.03 45,000.00 0 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 36.00 1000sqft 0.83 36,000.00 0 Hotel 50.00 Room 1.67 72,600.00 0
Quality Restaurant 8.00 1000sqft 0.18 8,000.00 0
Apartments Low Rise 25.00 Dwelling Unit 1.56 25,000.00 72 Apartments Mid Rise 975.00 Dwelling Unit 25.66 975,000.00 2789 Regional Shopping Center 56.00 1000sqft 1.29 56,000.00 0
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
9 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 33
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
Operational Year 2028
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
702.44 CH4 Intensity 0.029
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.006
(lb/MWhr)
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed)
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 129
I I I I I • I I I • I I I
------------------------------~-------------------------------1---------------l------------------i--------------- • I I I • I I I ------------------------------~-------------------------------1---------------I------------------~--------------- • I I I • I I I ------------------------------~-------------------------------1---------------l------------------i--------------- • I I I • I I I ------------------------------~-------------------------------1---------------I------------------~--------------- • I I I • I I I ------------------------------~-------------------------------1---------------l------------------i--------------- ' I • I I I ------------------------------,1,--------------------------------I----------------~-----------------~--------------- Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model.
Land Use - See SWAPE comment regarding residential and retail land uses.
Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment regarding individual construction phase lengths.
Demolition - Consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding demolition.
Vehicle Trips - Saturday trips consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding weekday and Sunday trips.
Woodstoves - Woodstoves and wood-burning fireplaces consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding gas fireplaces.
Energy Use -
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on construction-related mitigation.
Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.
Water Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberWood 1.25 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberWood 48.75 0.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 7.16 6.17
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 6.39 3.87
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.46 1.39
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 158.37 79.82
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 3.75
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 94.36 63.99
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 49.97 10.74
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 6.07 6.16
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.86 4.18
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.05 0.69
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 131.84 78.27
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 130
I I I
I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------~--------------------------
2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 3.20
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 72.16 57.65
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 25.24 6.39
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.59 5.83
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.65 4.13
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 11.03 6.41
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 127.15 65.80
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 3.84
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 89.95 62.64
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 42.70 9.43
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 1.25 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 48.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 1.25 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 48.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 3 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 131
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------I------------------------------~--------------------------
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2021 4.2865 46.4651 31.6150 0.0642 18.2675 2.0461 20.3135 9.9840 1.8824 11.8664 0.0000 6,221.493 7 6,221.493
7 1.9491 0.0000 6,270.221
4 2022 5.7218 38.9024 47.3319 0.1455 9.8688 1.6366 10.7736 3.6558 1.5057 5.1615 0.0000 14,630.30 99 14,630.30
99 1.9499 0.0000 14,657.26
63 2023 5.2705 26.4914 44.5936 0.1413 9.8688 0.7800 10.6488 2.6381 0.7328 3.3708 0.0000 14,210.34 24 14,210.34
24 1.0230 0.0000 14,235.91
60 2024 237.2328 9.5610 15.0611 0.0243 1.7884 0.4698 1.8628 0.4743 0.4322 0.5476 0.0000 2,352.417 8 2,352.417
8 0.7175 0.0000 2,370.355
0 Maximum 237.2328 46.4651 47.3319 0.1455 18.2675 2.0461 20.3135 9.9840 1.8824 11.8664 0.0000 14,630.30 99 14,630.30
99 1.9499 0.0000 14,657.26
63 Unmitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 4 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 132
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
I
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2021 4.2865 46.4651 31.6150 0.0642 18.2675 2.0461 20.3135 9.9840 1.8824 11.8664 0.0000 6,221.493 7 6,221.493
7 1.9491 0.0000 6,270.221
4 2022 5.7218 38.9024 47.3319 0.1455 9.8688 1.6366 10.7736 3.6558 1.5057 5.1615 0.0000 14,630.30 99 14,630.30
99 1.9499 0.0000 14,657.26
63 2023 5.2705 26.4914 44.5936 0.1413 9.8688 0.7800 10.6488 2.6381 0.7328 3.3708 0.0000 14,210.34 24 14,210.34
24 1.0230 0.0000 14,235.91
60 2024 237.2328 9.5610 15.0611 0.0243 1.7884 0.4698 1.8628 0.4743 0.4322 0.5476 0.0000 2,352.417 8 2,352.417
8 0.7175 0.0000 2,370.355
0 Maximum 237.2328 46.4651 47.3319 0.1455 18.2675 2.0461 20.3135 9.9840 1.8824 11.8664 0.0000 14,630.30 99 14,630.30
99 1.9499 0.0000 14,657.26
63 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 133
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
2.2 Overall Operational
Fugitive SO2 CO NOx ROG
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
CO2e N2O CH4 Total CO2 NBio- CO2 Bio- CO2
lb/day lb/day Category
18,148.59 0.0000 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0944 88.4430 15.0496 30.5020 Area 50 18,148.59
50 18,259.11 0.3300 0.4874
92 8,355.983 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.0418 4.2573 6.7462 0.7660 Energy 2 8,355.983
2 8,405.638 0.1532 0.1602
7 47,917.80 12.6083 0.3132 12.2950 46.2965 0.3373 45.9592 0.4681 110.0422 45.9914 9.5233 Mobile 05 47,917.80
05 47,972.68 2.1953
39 74,422.37 0.0000 14.7349 2.4399 12.2950 48.4231 2.4640 45.9592 0.6043 202.7424 67.7872 40.7912 Total 87 74,422.37
87 74,637.44 0.4832 2.8429
17 Unmitigated Operational
Fugitive SO2 CO NOx ROG
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
CO2e N2O CH4 Total CO2 NBio- CO2 Bio- CO2
lb/day lb/day Category
18,148.59 0.0000 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0944 88.4430 15.0496 30.5020 Area 50 18,148.59
50 18,259.11 0.3300 0.4874
92 8,355.983 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.0418 4.2573 6.7462 0.7660 Energy 2 8,355.983
2 8,405.638 0.1532 0.1602
7 47,917.80 12.6083 0.3132 12.2950 46.2965 0.3373 45.9592 0.4681 110.0422 45.9914 9.5233 Mobile 05 47,917.80
05 47,972.68 2.1953
39 74,422.37 0.0000 14.7349 2.4399 12.2950 48.4231 2.4640 45.9592 0.6043 202.7424 67.7872 40.7912 Total 87 74,422.37
87 74,637.44 0.4832 2.8429
17 Mitigated Operational
Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Page 6 of 35 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 134
r
r
r I I I I T I I I I I I I I I
,.
,.
••••••-~-------L-------L-------L-------•••••••••-------•-------L-------L-------L-------L-------L-------L-------L-------L-------•••••••••••• I I I I I ' I I I I I I I I I ■ I f ■
r I I I I T I I I I I I I I I
••••••-~-------L-------L-------L-------•••••••••-------•-------L-------L-------L-------L-------L-------L-------L-------L-------•••••••••••• I I I I I ' I I I I I I I I I ■ I f ■
r
'
r
r
r I I I I I ' I I I I I I I I I
•••••••~-------L-------L-------L-------•••••••••-------•-------L-------L-------L-------L-------L-------L-------L-------L-------•••••••••••• I : : : : i : : : : : : : : : ■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I ' I I I I I I I I I
•••••••~-------L-------L-------L-------•••••••••-------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------•----------- 1 I I I I ' I I I I I I I I I ■
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
r
'
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 9/1/2021 10/12/2021 5 30
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 10/13/2021 11/9/2021 5 20 3 Grading Grading 11/10/2021 1/11/2022 5 45
4 Building Construction Building Construction 1/12/2022 12/12/2023 5 500 5 Paving Paving 12/13/2023 1/30/2024 5 35
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 1/31/2024 3/19/2024 5 35 OffRoad Equipment
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 2,025,000; Residential Outdoor: 675,000; Non-Residential Indoor: 326,400; Non-Residential Outdoor: 108,800; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating ±sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 112.5
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 135
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I ■ ■ I I I I I
-------s----····················=-----------------------1------------~------------~--------~--------~------------------------- • ■ I I I I I ■ ■ I I I I I
•····••l••····················•·I-----------------------I------------~------------~--------~--------~---······················ ■ ■ I I I I I ■ ■ I I I I I
-------s----····················=-----------------------1------------~------------~--------~--------~------------------------- • ■ I I I I I ■ ■ I I I I I
-------s------------------------1-----------------------1------------~------------~--------~--------~------------------------- • ■ I I I I I ■ ■ I I I I I
-------s----····················~----------------------~-----------4-----------4--------~--------~------------------------- Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 136
I I
I
I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
I
-------------1---------T--------------
1 I
------------ :1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
------------ •1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
---- ----- --- .1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
-------------1---------T--------------
1 I
------------ :1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
------------ •1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
---- ----- --- .1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
-------------1---------T--------------
1 I
------------ :1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
------------ •1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
---- ----- --- .1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
-------------1---------T--------------
1 I
------------ :1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
------------ •1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
---- ----- --- .1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
-------------1---------T--------------
1 I
I I I
----------------------------~---------------------------1------------------ ~ ------------1---------------~--------------
3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 3.3074 0.0000 3.3074 0.5008 0.0000 0.5008 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 1.5513 1.5513 1.4411 1.4411 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 3.3074 1.5513 4.8588 0.5008 1.4411 1.9419 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 458.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 801.00 143.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 160.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 137
• I I I I I I I I I
• I I I I I I I I I ----------------:---------------~----------l----------~----------l-----------t----------~----------1--------------1----------~---------- • I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ----------------:---------------~----------l----------~----------l-----------t----------~----------1--------------1----------~---------- • I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ----------------:---------------~----------l----------~----------l-----------t----------~----------1--------------1----------~---------- • I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ----------------:---------------~----------l----------~----------l-----------t----------~----------1--------------1----------~---------- • I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ················~---------------l-----------~---------+---------~-----------l-----------~----------l---------------1-----------!-••·--·---- ■ ■
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -•-----•--•n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
I
3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.1304 4.1454 1.0182 0.0117 0.2669 0.0128 0.2797 0.0732 0.0122 0.0854 1,269.855 5 1,269.855
5 0.0908 1,272.125
2 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0715 0.0489 0.5524 1.6100e0030.1677 1.3500e0030.1690 0.0445 1.2500e0030.0457 160.8377 160.8377 4.7300e003160.9560 Total 0.2019 4.1943 1.5706 0.0133 0.4346 0.0141 0.4487 0.1176 0.0135 0.1311 1,430.693 2 1,430.693
2 0.0955 1,433.081
2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 3.3074 0.0000 3.3074 0.5008 0.0000 0.5008 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 1.5513 1.5513 1.4411 1.4411 0.0000 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 3.3074 1.5513 4.8588 0.5008 1.4411 1.9419 0.0000 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 10 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 138
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
I
I
I
I
i
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
I
I
3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.1304 4.1454 1.0182 0.0117 0.2669 0.0128 0.2797 0.0732 0.0122 0.0854 1,269.855 5 1,269.855
5 0.0908 1,272.125
2 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0715 0.0489 0.5524 1.6100e0030.1677 1.3500e0030.1690 0.0445 1.2500e0030.0457 160.8377 160.8377 4.7300e003160.9560 Total 0.2019 4.1943 1.5706 0.0133 0.4346 0.0141 0.4487 0.1176 0.0135 0.1311 1,430.693 2 1,430.693
2 0.0955 1,433.081
2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 2.0445 2.0445 1.8809 1.8809 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Total 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 18.0663 2.0445 20.1107 9.9307 1.8809 11.8116 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 11 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 139
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
I
I
I
I
i
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
I
I
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0858 0.0587 0.6629 1.9400e0030.2012 1.6300e0030.2028 0.0534 1.5000e0030.0549 193.0052 193.0052 5.6800e003193.1472 Total 0.0858 0.0587 0.6629 1.9400e0030.2012 1.6300e0030.2028 0.0534 1.5000e0030.0549 193.0052 193.0052 5.6800e003193.1472 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 2.0445 2.0445 1.8809 1.8809 0.0000 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Total 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 18.0663 2.0445 20.1107 9.9307 1.8809 11.8116 0.0000 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 140
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
I
I
I
'
' I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
I
I
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0858 0.0587 0.6629 1.9400e0030.2012 1.6300e0030.2028 0.0534 1.5000e0030.0549 193.0052 193.0052 5.6800e003193.1472 Total 0.0858 0.0587 0.6629 1.9400e0030.2012 1.6300e0030.2028 0.0534 1.5000e0030.0549 193.0052 193.0052 5.6800e003193.1472 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 1.9853 1.9853 1.8265 1.8265 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Total 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 8.6733 1.9853 10.6587 3.5965 1.8265 5.4230 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 13 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 141
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
I
I
I
'
' I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
I
I
3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0954 0.0652 0.7365 2.1500e0030.2236 1.8100e0030.2254 0.0593 1.6600e0030.0610 214.4502 214.4502 6.3100e003214.6080 Total 0.0954 0.0652 0.7365 2.1500e0030.2236 1.8100e0030.2254 0.0593 1.6600e0030.0610 214.4502 214.4502 6.3100e003214.6080 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 1.9853 1.9853 1.8265 1.8265 0.0000 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Total 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 8.6733 1.9853 10.6587 3.5965 1.8265 5.4230 0.0000 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 14 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 142
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
I
I
I
'
' I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
I
I
3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0954 0.0652 0.7365 2.1500e0030.2236 1.8100e0030.2254 0.0593 1.6600e0030.0610 214.4502 214.4502 6.3100e003214.6080 Total 0.0954 0.0652 0.7365 2.1500e0030.2236 1.8100e0030.2254 0.0593 1.6600e0030.0610 214.4502 214.4502 6.3100e003214.6080 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 8.6733 1.6349 10.3082 3.5965 1.5041 5.1006 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 15 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 143
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
I
I
I
'
' I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
I
I
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0896 0.0589 0.6784 2.0800e0030.2236 1.7500e0030.2253 0.0593 1.6100e0030.0609 206.9139 206.9139 5.7000e003207.0563 Total 0.0896 0.0589 0.6784 2.0800e0030.2236 1.7500e0030.2253 0.0593 1.6100e0030.0609 206.9139 206.9139 5.7000e003207.0563 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 0.0000 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 8.6733 1.6349 10.3082 3.5965 1.5041 5.1006 0.0000 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 16 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 144
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
I
I
I
'
' I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
I
I
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0896 0.0589 0.6784 2.0800e0030.2236 1.7500e0030.2253 0.0593 1.6100e0030.0609 206.9139 206.9139 5.7000e003207.0563 Total 0.0896 0.0589 0.6784 2.0800e0030.2236 1.7500e0030.2253 0.0593 1.6100e0030.0609 206.9139 206.9139 5.7000e003207.0563 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 145
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• - I I I I I I I
- I I I I I I I
- I I I I I I I
- I I I I I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I I '
' II I
I
I
I
I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.4284 13.1673 3.8005 0.0354 0.9155 0.0256 0.9412 0.2636 0.0245 0.2881 3,789.075 0 3,789.075
0 0.2381 3,795.028
3 Worker 3.5872 2.3593 27.1680 0.0832 8.9533 0.0701 9.0234 2.3745 0.0646 2.4390 8,286.901 3 8,286.901
3 0.2282 8,292.605
8 Total 4.0156 15.5266 30.9685 0.1186 9.8688 0.0957 9.9645 2.6381 0.0891 2.7271 12,075.97 63 12,075.97
63 0.4663 12,087.63
41 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 146
' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' II I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• --
' ' ' '
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.4284 13.1673 3.8005 0.0354 0.9155 0.0256 0.9412 0.2636 0.0245 0.2881 3,789.075 0 3,789.075
0 0.2381 3,795.028
3 Worker 3.5872 2.3593 27.1680 0.0832 8.9533 0.0701 9.0234 2.3745 0.0646 2.4390 8,286.901 3 8,286.901
3 0.2282 8,292.605
8 Total 4.0156 15.5266 30.9685 0.1186 9.8688 0.0957 9.9645 2.6381 0.0891 2.7271 12,075.97 63 12,075.97
63 0.4663 12,087.63
41 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 147
' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' II I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• --
' ' ' '
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.3183 9.9726 3.3771 0.0343 0.9156 0.0122 0.9277 0.2636 0.0116 0.2752 3,671.400 7 3,671.400
7 0.2096 3,676.641
7 Worker 3.3795 2.1338 24.9725 0.0801 8.9533 0.0681 9.0214 2.3745 0.0627 2.4372 7,983.731 8 7,983.731
8 0.2055 7,988.868
3 Total 3.6978 12.1065 28.3496 0.1144 9.8688 0.0803 9.9491 2.6381 0.0743 2.7124 11,655.13 25 11,655.13
25 0.4151 11,665.50
99 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 148
' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' II I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• --
' ' ' '
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.3183 9.9726 3.3771 0.0343 0.9156 0.0122 0.9277 0.2636 0.0116 0.2752 3,671.400 7 3,671.400
7 0.2096 3,676.641
7 Worker 3.3795 2.1338 24.9725 0.0801 8.9533 0.0681 9.0214 2.3745 0.0627 2.4372 7,983.731 8 7,983.731
8 0.2055 7,988.868
3 Total 3.6978 12.1065 28.3496 0.1144 9.8688 0.0803 9.9491 2.6381 0.0743 2.7124 11,655.13 25 11,655.13
25 0.4151 11,665.50
99 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 149
' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
' ' ' '
i
' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
' '
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0633 0.0400 0.4677 1.5000e0030.1677 1.2800e0030.1689 0.0445 1.1700e0030.0456 149.5081 149.5081 3.8500e003149.6043 Total 0.0633 0.0400 0.4677 1.5000e0030.1677 1.2800e0030.1689 0.0445 1.1700e0030.0456 149.5081 149.5081 3.8500e003149.6043 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 150
' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
' ' ' '
i
' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
' '
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0633 0.0400 0.4677 1.5000e0030.1677 1.2800e0030.1689 0.0445 1.1700e0030.0456 149.5081 149.5081 3.8500e003149.6043 Total 0.0633 0.0400 0.4677 1.5000e0030.1677 1.2800e0030.1689 0.0445 1.1700e0030.0456 149.5081 149.5081 3.8500e003149.6043 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 23 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 151
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• •• I •• I I I
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0601 0.0364 0.4354 1.4500e0030.1677 1.2600e0030.1689 0.0445 1.1600e0030.0456 144.8706 144.8706 3.5300e003144.9587 Total 0.0601 0.0364 0.4354 1.4500e0030.1677 1.2600e0030.1689 0.0445 1.1600e0030.0456 144.8706 144.8706 3.5300e003144.9587 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 24 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 152
' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
' ' ' '
i
' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
' '
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0601 0.0364 0.4354 1.4500e0030.1677 1.2600e0030.1689 0.0445 1.1600e0030.0456 144.8706 144.8706 3.5300e003144.9587 Total 0.0601 0.0364 0.4354 1.4500e0030.1677 1.2600e0030.1689 0.0445 1.1600e0030.0456 144.8706 144.8706 3.5300e003144.9587 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 236.4115 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 236.5923 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 25 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 153
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• •• I •• I I I
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.6406 0.3886 4.6439 0.0155 1.7884 0.0134 1.8018 0.4743 0.0123 0.4866 1,545.286 0 1,545.286
0 0.0376 1,546.226
2 Total 0.6406 0.3886 4.6439 0.0155 1.7884 0.0134 1.8018 0.4743 0.0123 0.4866 1,545.286 0 1,545.286
0 0.0376 1,546.226
2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 236.4115 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 236.5923 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 26 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 154
' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
' ' ' '
i
' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
' '
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.6406 0.3886 4.6439 0.0155 1.7884 0.0134 1.8018 0.4743 0.0123 0.4866 1,545.286 0 1,545.286
0 0.0376 1,546.226
2 Total 0.6406 0.3886 4.6439 0.0155 1.7884 0.0134 1.8018 0.4743 0.0123 0.4866 1,545.286 0 1,545.286
0 0.0376 1,546.226
2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 27 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 155
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I I
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 9.5233 45.9914 110.0422 0.4681 45.9592 0.3373 46.2965 12.2950 0.3132 12.6083 47,917.80 05 47,917.80
05 2.1953 47,972.68
39 Unmitigated 9.5233 45.9914 110.0422 0.4681 45.9592 0.3373 46.2965 12.2950 0.3132 12.6083 47,917.80 05 47,917.80
05 2.1953 47,972.68
39 4.2 Trip Summary Information
4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Apartments Low Rise 145.75 154.25 154.00 506,227 506,227 Apartments Mid Rise 4,026.75 3,773.25 4075.50 13,660,065 13,660,065 General Office Building 288.45 62.55 31.05 706,812 706,812 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 2,368.80 2,873.52 2817.72 3,413,937 3,413,937 Hotel 192.00 187.50 160.00 445,703 445,703
Quality Restaurant 501.12 511.92 461.20 707,488 707,488 Regional Shopping Center 528.08 601.44 357.84 1,112,221 1,112,221 Total 8,050.95 8,164.43 8,057.31 20,552,452 20,552,452
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 28 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 156
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
:: : : : : : : : : : i : : : : : I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -----------.r--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------· -------~-------,--------,--------,--------,, ------- .. ..
..
..
I I
I I •
····································~--------------~-----------t-----------4------------------------ -------------------------- • I I • ····································~--------------~-----------t-----------4------------------------ -------------------------- • I I • ····································~--------------~-----------t-----------4------------------------ -------------------------- • I I • ····································~--------------~-----------t-----------~------------------------ -------------------------- • I I • ····································~--------------~-----------t-----------~------------------------ -------------------------- • I I • ····································~--------------~-----------t-----------~------------------------ -------------------------- : I I • I I
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments Low Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 General Office Building 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 19 4 High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)
16.60 8.40 6.90 8.50 72.50 19.00 37 20 43
Hotel 16.60 8.40 6.90 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38 4
Quality Restaurant 16.60 8.40 6.90 12.00 69.00 19.00 38 18 44 Regional Shopping Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.30 64.70 19.00 54 35 11
5.0 Energy Detail
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Low Rise 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Apartments Mid Rise 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 General Office Building 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)
0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Hotel 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Quality Restaurant 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Regional Shopping Center 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 29 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 157
I I I I I I
i • I I ■ I I ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■r----------~---------T••••••••••T--------~•••••••••r••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••r••••••••••••••••• ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
•
•
r----------~---------T••••••••••T--------~•••••••••r•••••••••••••••••••••••r••••••••••r••••••••••••••••• I
I
I
I •
• I
I
I
I ••• •••
I I I ■ I I ■ ■ ■
I I I ■ I I ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■r----------~---------T••••••••••T--------~•••••••••r•••••••••••r•••••••••••r••••••••••r••••••••••••••••• I I I ■ I I ■ ■ ■
• I I • I I • ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■r----------~---------T••••••••••T--------~•••••••••r•••••••••••r•••••••••••r••••••••••r••••••••••••••••• I I I ■ I I ■ ■ ■
I I I ■ I I ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■r----------~---------T••••••••••T--------~•--•-----r•••--••••--••••--••••--•--••••--••r••••--••••--••••- 1 I I • I I ■ ■ • • I I • I I ■
• • • ■ • • ■ • ■ • • ■ ■ • • • • ■ ■ • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • .. • • • • • • • • • T • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • -,. • • • • • • • • •r • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • r • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • I I
-. --.. ----. -----. --. --. --. -.. -~------- -------- -------- -------- -------- ~------- ~------- ~------- -------- -------- -------- --. -.. - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...... ..;.-------· ---------· ---------· ---------· ---------· ---------· ---------· ,--------· ---------· ---------· ---------· ....... ' -• ----•• --•• -• --• --• --- -----• --=-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -----• - ·······················+·······~.-----+,,-----~,,-------11-----+,,-------11""""----+,,-----l----- l-----+,,-------11e--------1-••····· • • I I I I I I I I I I
....................... .;. ....... ..;.-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+------- ■ • I I I I I I I I I I • • I I I I I I I I I I ••••••••••••••••••••••• .;. ••••••• ..;.-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+------- ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 NaturalGas
Unmitigated
0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 30 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 158
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
-----------.r--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------· -------~-------,--------,--------,--------,, ------- .. ..
..
..
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Apartments Low
Rise
1119.16 0.0121 0.1031 0.0439 6.6000e0048.3400e0038.3400e0038.3400e0038.3400e003131.6662 131.6662 2.5200e0032.4100e003132.4486 Apartments Mid
Rise
35784.3 0.3859 3.2978 1.4033 0.0211 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 4,209.916 4 4,209.916
4 0.0807 0.0772 4,234.933
9 General Office
Building
1283.42 0.0138 0.1258 0.1057 7.5000e0049.5600e0039.5600e0039.5600e0039.5600e003150.9911 150.9911 2.8900e0032.7700e003151.8884 High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
22759.9 0.2455 2.2314 1.8743 0.0134 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 2,677.634 2 2,677.634
2 0.0513 0.0491 2,693.546
0 Hotel 4769.72 0.0514 0.4676 0.3928 2.8100e0030.0355 0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 561.1436 561.1436 0.0108 0.0103 564.4782 Quality
Restaurant
5057.75 0.0545 0.4959 0.4165 2.9800e0030.0377 0.0377 0.0377 0.0377 595.0298 595.0298 0.0114 0.0109 598.5658 Regional
Shopping Center
251.616 2.7100e0030.0247 0.0207 1.5000e0041.8700e0031.8700e0031.8700e0031.8700e00329.6019 29.6019 5.7000e0045.4000e00429.7778 Total 0.7660 6.7463 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 31 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 159
1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 • I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I, I
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
6.0 Area Detail
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Apartments Low
Rise
1.11916 0.0121 0.1031 0.0439 6.6000e0048.3400e0038.3400e0038.3400e0038.3400e003131.6662 131.6662 2.5200e0032.4100e003132.4486 Apartments Mid
Rise
35.7843 0.3859 3.2978 1.4033 0.0211 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 4,209.916 4 4,209.916
4 0.0807 0.0772 4,234.933
9 General Office
Building
1.28342 0.0138 0.1258 0.1057 7.5000e0049.5600e0039.5600e0039.5600e0039.5600e003150.9911 150.9911 2.8900e0032.7700e003151.8884 High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
22.7599 0.2455 2.2314 1.8743 0.0134 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 2,677.634 2 2,677.634
2 0.0513 0.0491 2,693.546
0 Hotel 4.76972 0.0514 0.4676 0.3928 2.8100e0030.0355 0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 561.1436 561.1436 0.0108 0.0103 564.4782 Quality
Restaurant
5.05775 0.0545 0.4959 0.4165 2.9800e0030.0377 0.0377 0.0377 0.0377 595.0298 595.0298 0.0114 0.0109 598.5658 Regional
Shopping Center
0.251616 2.7100e0030.0247 0.0207 1.5000e0041.8700e0031.8700e0031.8700e0031.8700e00329.6019 29.6019 5.7000e0045.4000e00429.7778 Total 0.7660 6.7463 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 32 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 160
1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 • I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I &1 '
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Unmitigated 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating
2.2670 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
24.1085 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 1.6500 14.1000 6.0000 0.0900 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 0.0000 18,000.00 00 18,000.00
00 0.3450 0.3300 18,106.96
50 Landscaping 2.4766 0.9496 82.4430 4.3600e0030.4574 0.4574 0.4574 0.4574 148.5950 148.5950 0.1424 152.1542 Total 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 33 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 161
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - - ~-------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------· - - - - - - -r--------,--------,--------,--------r - - - - - - - ., .,
.,
.,
' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••--------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••--------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••--------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' ' '
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
7.0 Water Detail
8.0 Waste Detail
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating
2.2670 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
24.1085 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 1.6500 14.1000 6.0000 0.0900 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 0.0000 18,000.00 00 18,000.00
00 0.3450 0.3300 18,106.96
50 Landscaping 2.4766 0.9496 82.4430 4.3600e0030.4574 0.4574 0.4574 0.4574 148.5950 148.5950 0.1424 152.1542 Total 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Mitigated
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 34 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 162
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
I
11.0 Vegetation
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 35 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 163
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 45.00 1000sqft 1.03 45,000.00 0 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 36.00 1000sqft 0.83 36,000.00 0 Hotel 50.00 Room 1.67 72,600.00 0
Quality Restaurant 8.00 1000sqft 0.18 8,000.00 0
Apartments Low Rise 25.00 Dwelling Unit 1.56 25,000.00 72 Apartments Mid Rise 975.00 Dwelling Unit 25.66 975,000.00 2789 Regional Shopping Center 56.00 1000sqft 1.29 56,000.00 0
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
9 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 33
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
Operational Year 2028
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
702.44 CH4 Intensity 0.029
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.006
(lb/MWhr)
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed)
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 164
I I I I I • I I I • I I I
------------------------------~-------------------------------1---------------l------------------i--------------- • I I I • I I I ------------------------------~-------------------------------1---------------I------------------~--------------- • I I I • I I I ------------------------------~-------------------------------1---------------l------------------i--------------- • I I I • I I I ------------------------------~-------------------------------1---------------I------------------~--------------- • I I I • I I I ------------------------------~-------------------------------1---------------l------------------i--------------- ' I • I I I ------------------------------,1,--------------------------------I----------------~-----------------~--------------- Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model.
Land Use - See SWAPE comment regarding residential and retail land uses.
Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment regarding individual construction phase lengths.
Demolition - Consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding demolition.
Vehicle Trips - Saturday trips consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding weekday and Sunday trips.
Woodstoves - Woodstoves and wood-burning fireplaces consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding gas fireplaces.
Energy Use -
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on construction-related mitigation.
Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.
Water Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.
Trips and VMT - Local hire provision
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberWood 1.25 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberWood 48.75 0.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 7.16 6.17
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 6.39 3.87
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.46 1.39
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 158.37 79.82
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 165
I I I
I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------~--------------------------
2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 3.75
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 94.36 63.99
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 49.97 10.74
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 6.07 6.16
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.86 4.18
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.05 0.69
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 131.84 78.27
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 3.20
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 72.16 57.65
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 25.24 6.39
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.59 5.83
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.65 4.13
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 11.03 6.41
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 127.15 65.80
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 3.84
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 89.95 62.64
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 42.70 9.43
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 1.25 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 48.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 1.25 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 48.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 3 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 166
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------I------------------------------~--------------------------
2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2021 0.1704 1.8234 1.1577 2.3800e0030.4141 0.0817 0.4958 0.1788 0.0754 0.2542 0.0000 210.7654 210.7654 0.0600 0.0000 212.2661 2022 0.5865 4.0240 5.1546 0.0155 0.9509 0.1175 1.0683 0.2518 0.1103 0.3621 0.0000 1,418.655 4 1,418.655
4 0.1215 0.0000 1,421.692
5 2023 0.5190 3.2850 4.7678 0.0147 0.8497 0.0971 0.9468 0.2283 0.0912 0.3195 0.0000 1,342.441 2 1,342.441
2 0.1115 0.0000 1,345.229
1 2024 4.1592 0.1313 0.2557 5.0000e0040.0221 6.3900e0030.0285 5.8700e0035.9700e0030.0118 0.0000 44.6355 44.6355 7.8300e0030.0000 44.8311 Maximum 4.1592 4.0240 5.1546 0.0155 0.9509 0.1175 1.0683 0.2518 0.1103 0.3621 0.0000 1,418.655 4 1,418.655
4 0.1215 0.0000 1,421.692
5 Unmitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 4 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 167
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
I
2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2021 0.1704 1.8234 1.1577 2.3800e0030.4141 0.0817 0.4958 0.1788 0.0754 0.2542 0.0000 210.7651 210.7651 0.0600 0.0000 212.2658 2022 0.5865 4.0240 5.1546 0.0155 0.9509 0.1175 1.0683 0.2518 0.1103 0.3621 0.0000 1,418.655 0 1,418.655
0 0.1215 0.0000 1,421.692
1 2023 0.5190 3.2850 4.7678 0.0147 0.8497 0.0971 0.9468 0.2283 0.0912 0.3195 0.0000 1,342.440 9 1,342.440
9 0.1115 0.0000 1,345.228
7 2024 4.1592 0.1313 0.2557 5.0000e0040.0221 6.3900e0030.0285 5.8700e0035.9700e0030.0118 0.0000 44.6354 44.6354 7.8300e0030.0000 44.8311 Maximum 4.1592 4.0240 5.1546 0.0155 0.9509 0.1175 1.0683 0.2518 0.1103 0.3621 0.0000 1,418.655 0 1,418.655
0 0.1215 0.0000 1,421.692
1 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 9-1-2021 11-30-2021 1.4091 1.4091
2 12-1-2021 2-28-2022 1.3329 1.3329
3 3-1-2022 5-31-2022 1.1499 1.1499
4 6-1-2022 8-31-2022 1.1457 1.1457
5 9-1-2022 11-30-2022 1.1415 1.1415
6 12-1-2022 2-28-2023 1.0278 1.0278
7 3-1-2023 5-31-2023 0.9868 0.9868
8 6-1-2023 8-31-2023 0.9831 0.9831
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 168
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6700e0030.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 0.0201 3.7400e003222.5835 Energy 0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e0030.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 3,896.073 2 3,896.073
2 0.1303 0.0468 3,913.283
3 Mobile 1.5857 7.9962 19.1834 0.0821 7.7979 0.0580 7.8559 2.0895 0.0539 2.1434 0.0000 7,620.498 6 7,620.498
6 0.3407 0.0000 7,629.016
2 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 207.8079 0.0000 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 29.1632 556.6420 585.8052 3.0183 0.0755 683.7567 Total 6.8692 9.5223 30.3407 0.0914 7.7979 0.2260 8.0240 2.0895 0.2219 2.3114 236.9712 12,294.18 07 12,531.15
19 15.7904 0.1260 12,963.47
51 Unmitigated Operational
9 9-1-2023 11-30-2023 0.9798 0.9798
10 12-1-2023 2-29-2024 2.8757 2.8757
11 3-1-2024 5-31-2024 1.6188 1.6188
Highest 2.8757 2.8757
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 6 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 169
., ' ., ' I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I -------------------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------•--······-------~-------~-------~-------~------- ., ' ., ' I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I -------------------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------•--······-------~-------~-------~-------~------- ., ' ., ' I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I -------------------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------•--······-------~-------~-------~-------~------- ., ' ., ' I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I -------------------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------•--······-------~-------~-------~-------~------- ., ., ' ' ' '
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6700e0030.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 0.0201 3.7400e003222.5835 Energy 0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e0030.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 3,896.073 2 3,896.073
2 0.1303 0.0468 3,913.283
3 Mobile 1.5857 7.9962 19.1834 0.0821 7.7979 0.0580 7.8559 2.0895 0.0539 2.1434 0.0000 7,620.498 6 7,620.498
6 0.3407 0.0000 7,629.016
2 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 207.8079 0.0000 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 29.1632 556.6420 585.8052 3.0183 0.0755 683.7567 Total 6.8692 9.5223 30.3407 0.0914 7.7979 0.2260 8.0240 2.0895 0.2219 2.3114 236.9712 12,294.18 07 12,531.15
19 15.7904 0.1260 12,963.47
51 Mitigated Operational
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 170
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 9/1/2021 10/12/2021 5 30
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 10/13/2021 11/9/2021 5 20 3 Grading Grading 11/10/2021 1/11/2022 5 45
4 Building Construction Building Construction 1/12/2022 12/12/2023 5 500 5 Paving Paving 12/13/2023 1/30/2024 5 35
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 1/31/2024 3/19/2024 5 35 OffRoad Equipment
Residential Indoor: 2,025,000; Residential Outdoor: 675,000; Non-Residential Indoor: 326,400; Non-Residential Outdoor: 108,800; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating ±sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 112.5
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 171
I ■ ■ I
-------1------------------------:-----------------------l------------~------------4--------~--------4------------------------- • ■ 1 I I I I ■ ■ 1 I I I I
-------1------------------------:-----------------------l------------~------------4--------~--------4------------------------- • ■ 1 I I I I ■ ■ 1 I I I I
-------1------------------------:-----------------------l------------~------------4--------~--------4------------------------- • ■ 1 I I I I ■ ■ 1 I I I I
-------1------------------------:-----------------------l------------~------------4--------~--------4------------------------- • ■ 1 I I I I ■ ■ 1 I I I I
-------l------------------------~----------------------4-------------1-------------I---------~--------~------------------------- Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 172
I I
I
I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
I
-------------1---------T--------------
1 I
------------ :1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
------------ •1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
---- ----- --- .1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
-------------1---------T--------------
1 I
------------ :1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
------------ •1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
---- ----- --- .1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
-------------1---------T--------------
1 I
------------ :1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
------------ •1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
---- ----- --- .1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
-------------1---------T--------------
1 I
------------ :1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
------------ •1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
---- ----- --- .1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
-------------1---------T--------------
1 I
I I I
----------------------------~---------------------------1------------------ ~ ------------1---------------~--------------
3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0496 0.0000 0.0496 7.5100e0030.0000 7.5100e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0475 0.4716 0.3235 5.8000e0040.0233 0.0233 0.0216 0.0216 0.0000 51.0012 51.0012 0.0144 0.0000 51.3601 Total 0.0475 0.4716 0.3235 5.8000e0040.0496 0.0233 0.0729 7.5100e0030.0216 0.0291 0.0000 51.0012 51.0012 0.0144 0.0000 51.3601 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 458.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 801.00 143.00 0.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 160.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 10 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 173
• I I I I I I I I I
• I I I I I I I I I ----------------:---------------~----------l----------~----------l-----------t----------~----------1--------------1----------~---------- • I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ----------------:---------------~----------l----------~----------l-----------t----------~----------1--------------1----------~---------- • I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ----------------:---------------~----------l----------~----------l-----------t----------~----------1--------------1----------~---------- • I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ----------------:---------------~----------l----------~----------l-----------t----------~----------1--------------1----------~---------- • I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ················~---------------l-----------~---------+---------~-----------l-----------~----------l---------------1-----------!-••·--·---- ■ ■
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -•-----•--•n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
I
3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 1.9300e0030.0634 0.0148 1.8000e0043.9400e0031.9000e0044.1300e0031.0800e0031.8000e0041.2600e0030.0000 17.4566 17.4566 1.2100e0030.0000 17.4869 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 7.2000e0045.3000e0046.0900e0032.0000e0051.6800e0031.0000e0051.6900e0034.5000e0041.0000e0054.6000e0040.0000 1.5281 1.5281 5.0000e0050.0000 1.5293 Total 2.6500e0030.0639 0.0209 2.0000e0045.6200e0032.0000e0045.8200e0031.5300e0031.9000e0041.7200e0030.0000 18.9847 18.9847 1.2600e0030.0000 19.0161 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0496 0.0000 0.0496 7.5100e0030.0000 7.5100e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0475 0.4716 0.3235 5.8000e0040.0233 0.0233 0.0216 0.0216 0.0000 51.0011 51.0011 0.0144 0.0000 51.3600 Total 0.0475 0.4716 0.3235 5.8000e0040.0496 0.0233 0.0729 7.5100e0030.0216 0.0291 0.0000 51.0011 51.0011 0.0144 0.0000 51.3600 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 11 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 174
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
I
I
I
I
i
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
I
I
3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 1.9300e0030.0634 0.0148 1.8000e0043.9400e0031.9000e0044.1300e0031.0800e0031.8000e0041.2600e0030.0000 17.4566 17.4566 1.2100e0030.0000 17.4869 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 7.2000e0045.3000e0046.0900e0032.0000e0051.6800e0031.0000e0051.6900e0034.5000e0041.0000e0054.6000e0040.0000 1.5281 1.5281 5.0000e0050.0000 1.5293 Total 2.6500e0030.0639 0.0209 2.0000e0045.6200e0032.0000e0045.8200e0031.5300e0031.9000e0041.7200e0030.0000 18.9847 18.9847 1.2600e0030.0000 19.0161 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1807 0.0000 0.1807 0.0993 0.0000 0.0993 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0389 0.4050 0.2115 3.8000e0040.0204 0.0204 0.0188 0.0188 0.0000 33.4357 33.4357 0.0108 0.0000 33.7061 Total 0.0389 0.4050 0.2115 3.8000e0040.1807 0.0204 0.2011 0.0993 0.0188 0.1181 0.0000 33.4357 33.4357 0.0108 0.0000 33.7061 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 175
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
I
I
I
'
' I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• .. ' •• I I I
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.8000e0044.3000e0044.8700e0031.0000e0051.3400e0031.0000e0051.3500e0033.6000e0041.0000e0053.7000e0040.0000 1.2225 1.2225 4.0000e0050.0000 1.2234 Total 5.8000e0044.3000e0044.8700e0031.0000e0051.3400e0031.0000e0051.3500e0033.6000e0041.0000e0053.7000e0040.0000 1.2225 1.2225 4.0000e0050.0000 1.2234 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1807 0.0000 0.1807 0.0993 0.0000 0.0993 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0389 0.4050 0.2115 3.8000e0040.0204 0.0204 0.0188 0.0188 0.0000 33.4357 33.4357 0.0108 0.0000 33.7060 Total 0.0389 0.4050 0.2115 3.8000e0040.1807 0.0204 0.2011 0.0993 0.0188 0.1181 0.0000 33.4357 33.4357 0.0108 0.0000 33.7060 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 13 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 176
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
I
I
I
'
' I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
I
I
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.8000e0044.3000e0044.8700e0031.0000e0051.3400e0031.0000e0051.3500e0033.6000e0041.0000e0053.7000e0040.0000 1.2225 1.2225 4.0000e0050.0000 1.2234 Total 5.8000e0044.3000e0044.8700e0031.0000e0051.3400e0031.0000e0051.3500e0033.6000e0041.0000e0053.7000e0040.0000 1.2225 1.2225 4.0000e0050.0000 1.2234 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1741 0.0000 0.1741 0.0693 0.0000 0.0693 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0796 0.8816 0.5867 1.1800e0030.0377 0.0377 0.0347 0.0347 0.0000 103.5405 103.5405 0.0335 0.0000 104.3776 Total 0.0796 0.8816 0.5867 1.1800e0030.1741 0.0377 0.2118 0.0693 0.0347 0.1040 0.0000 103.5405 103.5405 0.0335 0.0000 104.3776 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 14 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 177
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
I
I
I
'
' I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
I
I
3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.2200e0039.0000e0040.0103 3.0000e0052.8300e0032.0000e0052.8600e0037.5000e0042.0000e0057.8000e0040.0000 2.5808 2.5808 8.0000e0050.0000 2.5828 Total 1.2200e0039.0000e0040.0103 3.0000e0052.8300e0032.0000e0052.8600e0037.5000e0042.0000e0057.8000e0040.0000 2.5808 2.5808 8.0000e0050.0000 2.5828 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1741 0.0000 0.1741 0.0693 0.0000 0.0693 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0796 0.8816 0.5867 1.1800e0030.0377 0.0377 0.0347 0.0347 0.0000 103.5403 103.5403 0.0335 0.0000 104.3775 Total 0.0796 0.8816 0.5867 1.1800e0030.1741 0.0377 0.2118 0.0693 0.0347 0.1040 0.0000 103.5403 103.5403 0.0335 0.0000 104.3775 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 15 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 178
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
I
I
I
'
' I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
I
I
3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.2200e0039.0000e0040.0103 3.0000e0052.8300e0032.0000e0052.8600e0037.5000e0042.0000e0057.8000e0040.0000 2.5808 2.5808 8.0000e0050.0000 2.5828 Total 1.2200e0039.0000e0040.0103 3.0000e0052.8300e0032.0000e0052.8600e0037.5000e0042.0000e0057.8000e0040.0000 2.5808 2.5808 8.0000e0050.0000 2.5828 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0807 0.0000 0.0807 0.0180 0.0000 0.0180 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0127 0.1360 0.1017 2.2000e0045.7200e0035.7200e0035.2600e0035.2600e0030.0000 19.0871 19.0871 6.1700e0030.0000 19.2414 Total 0.0127 0.1360 0.1017 2.2000e0040.0807 5.7200e0030.0865 0.0180 5.2600e0030.0233 0.0000 19.0871 19.0871 6.1700e0030.0000 19.2414 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 16 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 179
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
I
I
I
'
' I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
I
I
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.1000e0041.5000e0041.7400e0031.0000e0055.2000e0040.0000 5.3000e0041.4000e0040.0000 1.4000e0040.0000 0.4587 0.4587 1.0000e0050.0000 0.4590 Total 2.1000e0041.5000e0041.7400e0031.0000e0055.2000e0040.0000 5.3000e0041.4000e0040.0000 1.4000e0040.0000 0.4587 0.4587 1.0000e0050.0000 0.4590 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0807 0.0000 0.0807 0.0180 0.0000 0.0180 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0127 0.1360 0.1017 2.2000e0045.7200e0035.7200e0035.2600e0035.2600e0030.0000 19.0871 19.0871 6.1700e0030.0000 19.2414 Total 0.0127 0.1360 0.1017 2.2000e0040.0807 5.7200e0030.0865 0.0180 5.2600e0030.0233 0.0000 19.0871 19.0871 6.1700e0030.0000 19.2414 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 180
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
I
I
I
'
' I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
I
I
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.1000e0041.5000e0041.7400e0031.0000e0055.2000e0040.0000 5.3000e0041.4000e0040.0000 1.4000e0040.0000 0.4587 0.4587 1.0000e0050.0000 0.4590 Total 2.1000e0041.5000e0041.7400e0031.0000e0055.2000e0040.0000 5.3000e0041.4000e0040.0000 1.4000e0040.0000 0.4587 0.4587 1.0000e0050.0000 0.4590 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.2158 1.9754 2.0700 3.4100e0030.1023 0.1023 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 293.1324 293.1324 0.0702 0.0000 294.8881 Total 0.2158 1.9754 2.0700 3.4100e0030.1023 0.1023 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 293.1324 293.1324 0.0702 0.0000 294.8881 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 181
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• - I I I I I I I
- I I I I I I I
- I I I I I I I
- I I I I I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I I '
' II I
I
I
I
I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0527 1.6961 0.4580 4.5500e0030.1140 3.1800e0030.1171 0.0329 3.0400e0030.0359 0.0000 441.9835 441.9835 0.0264 0.0000 442.6435 Worker 0.3051 0.2164 2.5233 7.3500e0030.7557 6.2300e0030.7619 0.2007 5.7400e0030.2065 0.0000 663.9936 663.9936 0.0187 0.0000 664.4604 Total 0.3578 1.9125 2.9812 0.0119 0.8696 9.4100e0030.8790 0.2336 8.7800e0030.2424 0.0000 1,105.977 1 1,105.977
1 0.0451 0.0000 1,107.103
9 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.2158 1.9754 2.0700 3.4100e0030.1023 0.1023 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 293.1321 293.1321 0.0702 0.0000 294.8877 Total 0.2158 1.9754 2.0700 3.4100e0030.1023 0.1023 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 293.1321 293.1321 0.0702 0.0000 294.8877 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 182
' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' II I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• --
' ' ' '
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0527 1.6961 0.4580 4.5500e0030.1140 3.1800e0030.1171 0.0329 3.0400e0030.0359 0.0000 441.9835 441.9835 0.0264 0.0000 442.6435 Worker 0.3051 0.2164 2.5233 7.3500e0030.7557 6.2300e0030.7619 0.2007 5.7400e0030.2065 0.0000 663.9936 663.9936 0.0187 0.0000 664.4604 Total 0.3578 1.9125 2.9812 0.0119 0.8696 9.4100e0030.8790 0.2336 8.7800e0030.2424 0.0000 1,105.977 1 1,105.977
1 0.0451 0.0000 1,107.103
9 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1942 1.7765 2.0061 3.3300e0030.0864 0.0864 0.0813 0.0813 0.0000 286.2789 286.2789 0.0681 0.0000 287.9814 Total 0.1942 1.7765 2.0061 3.3300e0030.0864 0.0864 0.0813 0.0813 0.0000 286.2789 286.2789 0.0681 0.0000 287.9814 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 183
' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' II I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• --
' ' ' '
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0382 1.2511 0.4011 4.3000e0030.1113 1.4600e0030.1127 0.0321 1.4000e0030.0335 0.0000 417.9930 417.9930 0.0228 0.0000 418.5624 Worker 0.2795 0.1910 2.2635 6.9100e0030.7377 5.9100e0030.7436 0.1960 5.4500e0030.2014 0.0000 624.5363 624.5363 0.0164 0.0000 624.9466 Total 0.3177 1.4420 2.6646 0.0112 0.8490 7.3700e0030.8564 0.2281 6.8500e0030.2349 0.0000 1,042.529 4 1,042.529
4 0.0392 0.0000 1,043.509
0 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1942 1.7765 2.0061 3.3300e0030.0864 0.0864 0.0813 0.0813 0.0000 286.2785 286.2785 0.0681 0.0000 287.9811 Total 0.1942 1.7765 2.0061 3.3300e0030.0864 0.0864 0.0813 0.0813 0.0000 286.2785 286.2785 0.0681 0.0000 287.9811 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 184
' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' II I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• --
' ' ' '
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0382 1.2511 0.4011 4.3000e0030.1113 1.4600e0030.1127 0.0321 1.4000e0030.0335 0.0000 417.9930 417.9930 0.0228 0.0000 418.5624 Worker 0.2795 0.1910 2.2635 6.9100e0030.7377 5.9100e0030.7436 0.1960 5.4500e0030.2014 0.0000 624.5363 624.5363 0.0164 0.0000 624.9466 Total 0.3177 1.4420 2.6646 0.0112 0.8490 7.3700e0030.8564 0.2281 6.8500e0030.2349 0.0000 1,042.529 4 1,042.529
4 0.0392 0.0000 1,043.509
0 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 6.7100e0030.0663 0.0948 1.5000e0043.3200e0033.3200e0033.0500e0033.0500e0030.0000 13.0175 13.0175 4.2100e0030.0000 13.1227 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 6.7100e0030.0663 0.0948 1.5000e0043.3200e0033.3200e0033.0500e0033.0500e0030.0000 13.0175 13.0175 4.2100e0030.0000 13.1227 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 185
' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
' ' ' '
i
' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
' '
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.8000e0041.9000e0042.2300e0031.0000e0057.3000e0041.0000e0057.3000e0041.9000e0041.0000e0052.0000e0040.0000 0.6156 0.6156 2.0000e0050.0000 0.6160 Total 2.8000e0041.9000e0042.2300e0031.0000e0057.3000e0041.0000e0057.3000e0041.9000e0041.0000e0052.0000e0040.0000 0.6156 0.6156 2.0000e0050.0000 0.6160 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 6.7100e0030.0663 0.0948 1.5000e0043.3200e0033.3200e0033.0500e0033.0500e0030.0000 13.0175 13.0175 4.2100e0030.0000 13.1227 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 6.7100e0030.0663 0.0948 1.5000e0043.3200e0033.3200e0033.0500e0033.0500e0030.0000 13.0175 13.0175 4.2100e0030.0000 13.1227 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 23 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 186
' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
' ' ' '
i
' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
' '
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.8000e0041.9000e0042.2300e0031.0000e0057.3000e0041.0000e0057.3000e0041.9000e0041.0000e0052.0000e0040.0000 0.6156 0.6156 2.0000e0050.0000 0.6160 Total 2.8000e0041.9000e0042.2300e0031.0000e0057.3000e0041.0000e0057.3000e0041.9000e0041.0000e0052.0000e0040.0000 0.6156 0.6156 2.0000e0050.0000 0.6160 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0109 0.1048 0.1609 2.5000e0045.1500e0035.1500e0034.7400e0034.7400e0030.0000 22.0292 22.0292 7.1200e0030.0000 22.2073 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0109 0.1048 0.1609 2.5000e0045.1500e0035.1500e0034.7400e0034.7400e0030.0000 22.0292 22.0292 7.1200e0030.0000 22.2073 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 24 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 187
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• •• I •• I I I
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.4000e0042.9000e0043.5100e0031.0000e0051.2300e0031.0000e0051.2400e0033.3000e0041.0000e0053.4000e0040.0000 1.0094 1.0094 3.0000e0050.0000 1.0100 Total 4.4000e0042.9000e0043.5100e0031.0000e0051.2300e0031.0000e0051.2400e0033.3000e0041.0000e0053.4000e0040.0000 1.0094 1.0094 3.0000e0050.0000 1.0100 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0109 0.1048 0.1609 2.5000e0045.1500e0035.1500e0034.7400e0034.7400e0030.0000 22.0292 22.0292 7.1200e0030.0000 22.2073 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0109 0.1048 0.1609 2.5000e0045.1500e0035.1500e0034.7400e0034.7400e0030.0000 22.0292 22.0292 7.1200e0030.0000 22.2073 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 25 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 188
' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
' ' ' '
i
' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
' '
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.4000e0042.9000e0043.5100e0031.0000e0051.2300e0031.0000e0051.2400e0033.3000e0041.0000e0053.4000e0040.0000 1.0094 1.0094 3.0000e0050.0000 1.0100 Total 4.4000e0042.9000e0043.5100e0031.0000e0051.2300e0031.0000e0051.2400e0033.3000e0041.0000e0053.4000e0040.0000 1.0094 1.0094 3.0000e0050.0000 1.0100 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 4.1372 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1600e0030.0213 0.0317 5.0000e0051.0700e0031.0700e0031.0700e0031.0700e0030.0000 4.4682 4.4682 2.5000e0040.0000 4.4745 Total 4.1404 0.0213 0.0317 5.0000e0051.0700e0031.0700e0031.0700e0031.0700e0030.0000 4.4682 4.4682 2.5000e0040.0000 4.4745 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 26 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 189
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
I
I
I
'
i
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
I
I
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 7.4800e0034.9300e0030.0596 1.9000e0040.0209 1.6000e0040.0211 5.5500e0031.5000e0045.7000e0030.0000 17.1287 17.1287 4.3000e0040.0000 17.1394 Total 7.4800e0034.9300e0030.0596 1.9000e0040.0209 1.6000e0040.0211 5.5500e0031.5000e0045.7000e0030.0000 17.1287 17.1287 4.3000e0040.0000 17.1394 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 4.1372 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1600e0030.0213 0.0317 5.0000e0051.0700e0031.0700e0031.0700e0031.0700e0030.0000 4.4682 4.4682 2.5000e0040.0000 4.4745 Total 4.1404 0.0213 0.0317 5.0000e0051.0700e0031.0700e0031.0700e0031.0700e0030.0000 4.4682 4.4682 2.5000e0040.0000 4.4745 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 27 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 190
' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
' ' ' '
i
' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
' '
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 7.4800e0034.9300e0030.0596 1.9000e0040.0209 1.6000e0040.0211 5.5500e0031.5000e0045.7000e0030.0000 17.1287 17.1287 4.3000e0040.0000 17.1394 Total 7.4800e0034.9300e0030.0596 1.9000e0040.0209 1.6000e0040.0211 5.5500e0031.5000e0045.7000e0030.0000 17.1287 17.1287 4.3000e0040.0000 17.1394 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 28 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 191
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I ' ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 1.5857 7.9962 19.1834 0.0821 7.7979 0.0580 7.8559 2.0895 0.0539 2.1434 0.0000 7,620.498 6 7,620.498
6 0.3407 0.0000 7,629.016
2 Unmitigated 1.5857 7.9962 19.1834 0.0821 7.7979 0.0580 7.8559 2.0895 0.0539 2.1434 0.0000 7,620.498 6 7,620.498
6 0.3407 0.0000 7,629.016
2 4.2 Trip Summary Information
4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Apartments Low Rise 145.75 154.25 154.00 506,227 506,227 Apartments Mid Rise 4,026.75 3,773.25 4075.50 13,660,065 13,660,065 General Office Building 288.45 62.55 31.05 706,812 706,812 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 2,368.80 2,873.52 2817.72 3,413,937 3,413,937 Hotel 192.00 187.50 160.00 445,703 445,703
Quality Restaurant 501.12 511.92 461.20 707,488 707,488 Regional Shopping Center 528.08 601.44 357.84 1,112,221 1,112,221 Total 8,050.95 8,164.43 8,057.31 20,552,452 20,552,452
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 29 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 192
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
:: : : : : : : : : : i : : : : : I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -----------.r--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------· -------~-------,--------,--------,--------,, ------- .. ..
..
..
I I
I I •
····································~--------------~-----------t-----------4------------------------ -------------------------- • I I • ····································~--------------~-----------t-----------4------------------------ -------------------------- • I I • ····································~--------------~-----------t-----------4------------------------ -------------------------- • I I • ····································~--------------~-----------t-----------~------------------------ -------------------------- • I I • ····································~--------------~-----------t-----------~------------------------ -------------------------- • I I • ····································~--------------~-----------t-----------~------------------------ -------------------------- : I I • I I
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments Low Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 General Office Building 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 19 4 High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)
16.60 8.40 6.90 8.50 72.50 19.00 37 20 43
Hotel 16.60 8.40 6.90 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38 4
Quality Restaurant 16.60 8.40 6.90 12.00 69.00 19.00 38 18 44 Regional Shopping Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.30 64.70 19.00 54 35 11
5.0 Energy Detail
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Low Rise 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Apartments Mid Rise 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 General Office Building 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)
0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Hotel 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Quality Restaurant 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Regional Shopping Center 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 30 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 193
I I I I I I
i • I I ■ I I ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■r----------~---------T••••••••••T--------~•••••••••r••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••r••••••••••••••••• ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
•
•
r----------~---------T••••••••••T--------~•••••••••r•••••••••••••••••••••••r••••••••••r••••••••••••••••• I
I
I
I •
• I
I
I
I ••• •••
I I I ■ I I ■ ■ ■
I I I ■ I I ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■r----------~---------T••••••••••T--------~•••••••••r•••••••••••r•••••••••••r••••••••••r••••••••••••••••• I I I ■ I I ■ ■ ■
• I I • I I • ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■r----------~---------T••••••••••T--------~•••••••••r•••••••••••r•••••••••••r••••••••••r••••••••••••••••• I I I ■ I I ■ ■ ■
I I I ■ I I ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■r----------~---------T••••••••••T--------~•--•-----r•••--••••--••••--••••--•--••••--••r••••--••••--••••- 1 I I • I I ■ ■ • • I I • I I ■
• • • ■ • • ■ • ■ • • ■ ■ • • • • ■ ■ • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • .. • • • • • • • • • T • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • -,. • • • • • • • • •r • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • r • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • I I
-------~------- -------- -------- -------- -------- ~------- ~------- ~------- -------- -------- -------- ------- -------~------- -------- ~------- ~------- ~------- ~------- ~------- ~------- -------- -------- -------- ------- . -------,-------- -----------------------+-------~------+,,-----~,,-----i-----+,,-------11""""----+,,-----1----- 1-----+,,-------11""""-----➔------- • • I I I I I I I I I I -----------------------~-------4--------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+------- • • I I I I I I I I I I • • I I I I I I I I I I -----------------------~-------4--------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+------- ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2,512.646
5 2,512.646
5 0.1037 0.0215 2,521.635
6 Electricity
Unmitigated
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2,512.646
5 2,512.646
5 0.1037 0.0215 2,521.635
6 NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e0030.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 1,383.426 7 1,383.426
7 0.0265 0.0254 1,391.647
8 NaturalGas
Unmitigated
0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e0030.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 1,383.426 7 1,383.426
7 0.0265 0.0254 1,391.647
8 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 31 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 194
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
.. ' •• I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• .. ' •• I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
-----------.r--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------· -------~-------,--------,--------,--------,, ------- .. ..
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
408494 2.2000e0030.0188 8.0100e0031.2000e0041.5200e0031.5200e0031.5200e0031.5200e0030.0000 21.7988 21.7988 4.2000e0044.0000e00421.9284 Apartments Mid
Rise
1.30613e
+007
0.0704 0.6018 0.2561 3.8400e0030.0487 0.0487 0.0487 0.0487 0.0000 696.9989 696.9989 0.0134 0.0128 701.1408 General Office
Building
468450 2.5300e0030.0230 0.0193 1.4000e0041.7500e0031.7500e0031.7500e0031.7500e0030.0000 24.9983 24.9983 4.8000e0044.6000e00425.1468 High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
8.30736e
+006
0.0448 0.4072 0.3421 2.4400e0030.0310 0.0310 0.0310 0.0310 0.0000 443.3124 443.3124 8.5000e0038.1300e003445.9468 Hotel 1.74095e
+006
9.3900e0030.0853 0.0717 5.1000e0046.4900e0036.4900e0036.4900e0036.4900e0030.0000 92.9036 92.9036 1.7800e0031.7000e00393.4557 Quality
Restaurant
1.84608e
+006
9.9500e0030.0905 0.0760 5.4000e0046.8800e0036.8800e0036.8800e0036.8800e0030.0000 98.5139 98.5139 1.8900e0031.8100e00399.0993 Regional
Shopping Center
91840 5.0000e0044.5000e0033.7800e0033.0000e0053.4000e0043.4000e0043.4000e0043.4000e0040.0000 4.9009 4.9009 9.0000e0059.0000e0054.9301 Total 0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e0030.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 1,383.426 8 1,383.426
8 0.0265 0.0254 1,391.647
8 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 32 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 195
1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 • I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I, I
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
408494 2.2000e0030.0188 8.0100e0031.2000e0041.5200e0031.5200e0031.5200e0031.5200e0030.0000 21.7988 21.7988 4.2000e0044.0000e00421.9284 Apartments Mid
Rise
1.30613e
+007
0.0704 0.6018 0.2561 3.8400e0030.0487 0.0487 0.0487 0.0487 0.0000 696.9989 696.9989 0.0134 0.0128 701.1408 General Office
Building
468450 2.5300e0030.0230 0.0193 1.4000e0041.7500e0031.7500e0031.7500e0031.7500e0030.0000 24.9983 24.9983 4.8000e0044.6000e00425.1468 High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
8.30736e
+006
0.0448 0.4072 0.3421 2.4400e0030.0310 0.0310 0.0310 0.0310 0.0000 443.3124 443.3124 8.5000e0038.1300e003445.9468 Hotel 1.74095e
+006
9.3900e0030.0853 0.0717 5.1000e0046.4900e0036.4900e0036.4900e0036.4900e0030.0000 92.9036 92.9036 1.7800e0031.7000e00393.4557 Quality
Restaurant
1.84608e
+006
9.9500e0030.0905 0.0760 5.4000e0046.8800e0036.8800e0036.8800e0036.8800e0030.0000 98.5139 98.5139 1.8900e0031.8100e00399.0993 Regional
Shopping Center
91840 5.0000e0044.5000e0033.7800e0033.0000e0053.4000e0043.4000e0043.4000e0043.4000e0040.0000 4.9009 4.9009 9.0000e0059.0000e0054.9301 Total 0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e0030.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 1,383.426 8 1,383.426
8 0.0265 0.0254 1,391.647
8 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 33 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 196
1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 • I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I &1 '
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
106010 33.7770 1.3900e0032.9000e00433.8978
Apartments Mid
Rise
3.94697e
+006
1,257.587
9 0.0519 0.0107 1,262.086
9 General Office
Building
584550 186.2502 7.6900e0031.5900e003186.9165
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
1.58904e
+006
506.3022 0.0209 4.3200e003508.1135
Hotel 550308 175.3399 7.2400e0031.5000e003175.9672
Quality
Restaurant
353120 112.5116 4.6500e0039.6000e004112.9141
Regional
Shopping Center
756000 240.8778 9.9400e0032.0600e003241.7395
Total 2,512.646
5 0.1037 0.0215 2,521.635
6 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 34 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 197
L
L
L I 11 I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------T••••••• L
L
L I 11 I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------T••••••• L
L
L I 11 I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------T••••••• L
L
L I 11 I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------T••••••• L
L
L I 11 I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------T••••••• L
L
L I 11 I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------T••••••• L
L
L
L
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
6.0 Area Detail
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
106010 33.7770 1.3900e0032.9000e00433.8978
Apartments Mid
Rise
3.94697e
+006
1,257.587
9 0.0519 0.0107 1,262.086
9 General Office
Building
584550 186.2502 7.6900e0031.5900e003186.9165
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
1.58904e
+006
506.3022 0.0209 4.3200e003508.1135
Hotel 550308 175.3399 7.2400e0031.5000e003175.9672
Quality
Restaurant
353120 112.5116 4.6500e0039.6000e004112.9141
Regional
Shopping Center
756000 240.8778 9.9400e0032.0600e003241.7395
Total 2,512.646
5 0.1037 0.0215 2,521.635
6 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 35 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 198
L
L
L I 11 I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------T••••••• L
L
L I 11 I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------T••••••• L
L
L I 11 I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------T••••••• L
L
L I 11 I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------T••••••• L
L
L I 11 I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------T••••••• L
L
L I 11 I I I •••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------T••••••• L
L
L
L
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6700e0030.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 0.0201 3.7400e003222.5835 Unmitigated 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6700e0030.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 0.0201 3.7400e003222.5835
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating
0.4137 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products
4.3998 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0206 0.1763 0.0750 1.1200e0030.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0000 204.1166 204.1166 3.9100e0033.7400e003205.3295 Landscaping 0.3096 0.1187 10.3054 5.4000e0040.0572 0.0572 0.0572 0.0572 0.0000 16.8504 16.8504 0.0161 0.0000 17.2540 Total 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6600e0030.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 0.0201 3.7400e003222.5835 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 36 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 199
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - - ~-------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------· - - - - - - -r--------,--------,--------,--------r - - - - - - - ., .,
.,
.,
' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••--------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••--------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••--------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' ' '
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
7.0 Water Detail
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating
0.4137 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products
4.3998 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0206 0.1763 0.0750 1.1200e0030.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0000 204.1166 204.1166 3.9100e0033.7400e003205.3295 Landscaping 0.3096 0.1187 10.3054 5.4000e0040.0572 0.0572 0.0572 0.0572 0.0000 16.8504 16.8504 0.0161 0.0000 17.2540 Total 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6600e0030.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 0.0201 3.7400e003222.5835 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 37 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 200
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
'
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 585.8052 3.0183 0.0755 683.7567
Unmitigated 585.8052 3.0183 0.0755 683.7567
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 38 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 201
.,
.,
I I I
I I I I
-----------~-------,--------,--------r ------- .,
.,
7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
1.62885 /
1.02688
10.9095 0.0535 1.3400e00312.6471
Apartments Mid
Rise
63.5252 /
40.0485
425.4719 2.0867 0.0523 493.2363
General Office
Building
7.99802 /
4.90201
53.0719 0.2627 6.5900e00361.6019
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
10.9272 /
0.697482
51.2702 0.3580 8.8200e00362.8482
Hotel 1.26834 /
0.140927
6.1633 0.0416 1.0300e0037.5079
Quality
Restaurant
2.42827 /
0.154996
11.3934 0.0796 1.9600e00313.9663
Regional
Shopping Center
4.14806 /
2.54236
27.5250 0.1363 3.4200e00331.9490
Total 585.8052 3.0183 0.0755 683.7567
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 39 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 202
1,
1,
1, I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • r- - - - - - - .. ,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • 1, 1,
1, I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • r- - - - - - - .. ,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • 1, 1,
1, I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • r- - - - - - - .. ,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • 1, 1,
1, I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • r- - - - - - - .. ,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • 1, 1,
1, I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • r- - - - - - - .. ,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • 1, 1,
1, I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • r- - - - - - - .. ,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • 1, 1,
1,
I,
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
1.62885 /
1.02688
10.9095 0.0535 1.3400e00312.6471
Apartments Mid
Rise
63.5252 /
40.0485
425.4719 2.0867 0.0523 493.2363
General Office
Building
7.99802 /
4.90201
53.0719 0.2627 6.5900e00361.6019
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
10.9272 /
0.697482
51.2702 0.3580 8.8200e00362.8482
Hotel 1.26834 /
0.140927
6.1633 0.0416 1.0300e0037.5079
Quality
Restaurant
2.42827 /
0.154996
11.3934 0.0796 1.9600e00313.9663
Regional
Shopping Center
4.14806 /
2.54236
27.5250 0.1363 3.4200e00331.9490
Total 585.8052 3.0183 0.0755 683.7567
Mitigated
8.0 Waste Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 40 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 203
1,
1,
1, I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • r- - - - - - - .. ,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • 1, 1,
1, I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • r- - - - - - - .. ,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • 1, 1,
1, I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • r- - - - - - - .. ,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • 1, 1,
1, I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • r- - - - - - - .. ,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • 1, 1,
1, I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • r- - - - - - - .. ,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • 1, 1,
1, I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • r- - - - - - - .. ,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • 1, 1,
1,
I,
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354
Unmitigated 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 41 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 204
.,
.,
I I I
I I I I
-----------~-------,--------,--------r ------- .,
.,
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
11.5 2.3344 0.1380 0.0000 5.7834
Apartments Mid
Rise
448.5 91.0415 5.3804 0.0000 225.5513
General Office
Building
41.85 8.4952 0.5021 0.0000 21.0464
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
428.4 86.9613 5.1393 0.0000 215.4430
Hotel 27.38 5.5579 0.3285 0.0000 13.7694
Quality
Restaurant
7.3 1.4818 0.0876 0.0000 3.6712
Regional
Shopping Center
58.8 11.9359 0.7054 0.0000 29.5706
Total 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 42 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 205
1,
1,
1, I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • r- - - - - - - .. ,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • 1, 1,
1, I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • r- - - - - - - .. ,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • 1, 1,
1, I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • r- - - - - - - .. ,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • 1, 1,
1, I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • r- - - - - - - .. ,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • 1, 1,
1, I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • r- - - - - - - .. ,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • 1, 1,
1, I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • r- - - - - - - .. ,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • 1, 1,
1,
I,
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
11.5 2.3344 0.1380 0.0000 5.7834
Apartments Mid
Rise
448.5 91.0415 5.3804 0.0000 225.5513
General Office
Building
41.85 8.4952 0.5021 0.0000 21.0464
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
428.4 86.9613 5.1393 0.0000 215.4430
Hotel 27.38 5.5579 0.3285 0.0000 13.7694
Quality
Restaurant
7.3 1.4818 0.0876 0.0000 3.6712
Regional
Shopping Center
58.8 11.9359 0.7054 0.0000 29.5706
Total 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354
Mitigated
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 43 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 206
1,
1,
1, I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • r- - - - - - - .. ,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • 1, 1,
1, I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • r- - - - - - - .. ,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • 1, 1,
1, I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • r- - - - - - - .. ,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • 1, 1,
1, I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • r- - - - - - - .. ,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • 1, 1,
1, I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • r- - - - - - - .. ,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • 1, 1,
1, I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • r- - - - - - - .. ,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • 1, 1,
1,
I,
11.0 Vegetation
Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 44 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 207
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 45.00 1000sqft 1.03 45,000.00 0 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 36.00 1000sqft 0.83 36,000.00 0 Hotel 50.00 Room 1.67 72,600.00 0
Quality Restaurant 8.00 1000sqft 0.18 8,000.00 0
Apartments Low Rise 25.00 Dwelling Unit 1.56 25,000.00 72 Apartments Mid Rise 975.00 Dwelling Unit 25.66 975,000.00 2789 Regional Shopping Center 56.00 1000sqft 1.29 56,000.00 0
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
9 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 33
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
Operational Year 2028
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
702.44 CH4 Intensity 0.029
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.006
(lb/MWhr)
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed)
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 208
I I I I I • I I I • I I I
------------------------------~-------------------------------1---------------l------------------i--------------- • I I I • I I I ------------------------------~-------------------------------1---------------I------------------~--------------- • I I I • I I I ------------------------------~-------------------------------1---------------l------------------i--------------- • I I I • I I I ------------------------------~-------------------------------1---------------I------------------~--------------- • I I I • I I I ------------------------------~-------------------------------1---------------l------------------i--------------- ' I • I I I ------------------------------,1,--------------------------------I----------------~-----------------~--------------- Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model.
Land Use - See SWAPE comment regarding residential and retail land uses.
Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment regarding individual construction phase lengths.
Demolition - Consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding demolition.
Vehicle Trips - Saturday trips consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding weekday and Sunday trips.
Woodstoves - Woodstoves and wood-burning fireplaces consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding gas fireplaces.
Energy Use -
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on construction-related mitigation.
Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.
Water Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.
Trips and VMT - Local hire provision
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberWood 1.25 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberWood 48.75 0.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 7.16 6.17
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 6.39 3.87
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.46 1.39
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 158.37 79.82
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 209
I I I
I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I • I -----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------~--------------------------
2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 3.75
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 94.36 63.99
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 49.97 10.74
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 6.07 6.16
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.86 4.18
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.05 0.69
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 131.84 78.27
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 3.20
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 72.16 57.65
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 25.24 6.39
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.59 5.83
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.65 4.13
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 11.03 6.41
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 127.15 65.80
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 3.84
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 89.95 62.64
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 42.70 9.43
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 1.25 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 48.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 1.25 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 48.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 3 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 210
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- ■ ■ I ■ ■ I -----------------------------4------------------------------I------------------------------~--------------------------
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2021 4.2561 46.4415 31.4494 0.0636 18.2032 2.0456 20.2488 9.9670 1.8820 11.8490 0.0000 6,163.416 6 6,163.416
6 1.9475 0.0000 6,212.103
9 2022 4.5441 38.8811 40.8776 0.1240 8.8255 1.6361 10.4616 3.6369 1.5052 5.1421 0.0000 12,493.44 03 12,493.44
03 1.9485 0.0000 12,518.57
07 2023 4.1534 25.7658 38.7457 0.1206 7.0088 0.7592 7.7679 1.8799 0.7136 2.5935 0.0000 12,150.48 90 12,150.48
90 0.9589 0.0000 12,174.46
15 2024 237.0219 9.5478 14.9642 0.0239 1.2171 0.4694 1.2875 0.3229 0.4319 0.4621 0.0000 2,313.180 8 2,313.180
8 0.7166 0.0000 2,331.095
6 Maximum 237.0219 46.4415 40.8776 0.1240 18.2032 2.0456 20.2488 9.9670 1.8820 11.8490 0.0000 12,493.44 03 12,493.44
03 1.9485 0.0000 12,518.57
07 Unmitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 4 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 211
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
I
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2021 4.2561 46.4415 31.4494 0.0636 18.2032 2.0456 20.2488 9.9670 1.8820 11.8490 0.0000 6,163.416 6 6,163.416
6 1.9475 0.0000 6,212.103
9 2022 4.5441 38.8811 40.8776 0.1240 8.8255 1.6361 10.4616 3.6369 1.5052 5.1421 0.0000 12,493.44 03 12,493.44
03 1.9485 0.0000 12,518.57
07 2023 4.1534 25.7658 38.7457 0.1206 7.0088 0.7592 7.7679 1.8799 0.7136 2.5935 0.0000 12,150.48 90 12,150.48
90 0.9589 0.0000 12,174.46
15 2024 237.0219 9.5478 14.9642 0.0239 1.2171 0.4694 1.2875 0.3229 0.4319 0.4621 0.0000 2,313.180 8 2,313.180
8 0.7166 0.0000 2,331.095
5 Maximum 237.0219 46.4415 40.8776 0.1240 18.2032 2.0456 20.2488 9.9670 1.8820 11.8490 0.0000 12,493.44 03 12,493.44
03 1.9485 0.0000 12,518.57
07 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 212
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
2.2 Overall Operational
Fugitive SO2 CO NOx ROG
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
CO2e N2O CH4 Total CO2 NBio- CO2 Bio- CO2
lb/day lb/day Category
18,148.59 0.0000 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0944 88.4430 15.0496 30.5020 Area 50 18,148.59
50 18,259.11 0.3300 0.4874
92 8,355.983 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.0418 4.2573 6.7462 0.7660 Energy 2 8,355.983
2 8,405.638 0.1532 0.1602
7 50,306.60 12.6070 0.3119 12.2950 46.2951 0.3360 45.9592 0.4917 114.8495 45.4304 9.8489 Mobile 34 50,306.60
34 50,361.12 2.1807
08 76,811.18 0.0000 14.7336 2.4385 12.2950 48.4217 2.4626 45.9592 0.6278 207.5497 67.2262 41.1168 Total 16 76,811.18
16 77,025.87 0.4832 2.8282
86 Unmitigated Operational
Fugitive SO2 CO NOx ROG
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
CO2e N2O CH4 Total CO2 NBio- CO2 Bio- CO2
lb/day lb/day Category
18,148.59 0.0000 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0944 88.4430 15.0496 30.5020 Area 50 18,148.59
50 18,259.11 0.3300 0.4874
92 8,355.983 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.0418 4.2573 6.7462 0.7660 Energy 2 8,355.983
2 8,405.638 0.1532 0.1602
7 50,306.60 12.6070 0.3119 12.2950 46.2951 0.3360 45.9592 0.4917 114.8495 45.4304 9.8489 Mobile 34 50,306.60
34 50,361.12 2.1807
08 76,811.18 0.0000 14.7336 2.4385 12.2950 48.4217 2.4626 45.9592 0.6278 207.5497 67.2262 41.1168 Total 16 76,811.18
16 77,025.87 0.4832 2.8282
86 Mitigated Operational
Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Page 6 of 35 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 213
r
r
r I I I I T I I I I I I I I I
,.
,.
••••••-~-------L-------L-------L-------•••••••••-------•-------L-------L-------L-------L-------L-------L-------L-------L-------•••••••••••• I I I I I ' I I I I I I I I I ■ I f ■
r I I I I T I I I I I I I I I
••••••-~-------L-------L-------L-------•••••••••-------•-------L-------L-------L-------L-------L-------L-------L-------L-------•••••••••••• I I I I I ' I I I I I I I I I ■ I f ■
r
'
r
r
r I I I I I ' I I I I I I I I I
•••••••~-------L-------L-------L-------•••••••••-------•-------L-------L-------L-------L-------L-------L-------L-------L-------•••••••••••• I : : : : i : : : : : : : : : ■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I ' I I I I I I I I I
•••••••~-------L-------L-------L-------•••••••••-------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------•----------- 1 I I I I ' I I I I I I I I I ■
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
r
'
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 9/1/2021 10/12/2021 5 30
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 10/13/2021 11/9/2021 5 20 3 Grading Grading 11/10/2021 1/11/2022 5 45
4 Building Construction Building Construction 1/12/2022 12/12/2023 5 500 5 Paving Paving 12/13/2023 1/30/2024 5 35
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 1/31/2024 3/19/2024 5 35 OffRoad Equipment
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 2,025,000; Residential Outdoor: 675,000; Non-Residential Indoor: 326,400; Non-Residential Outdoor: 108,800; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating ±sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 112.5
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 214
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I ■ ■ I I I I I
-------s----····················=-----------------------1------------~------------~--------~--------~------------------------- • ■ I I I I I ■ ■ I I I I I
•····••l••····················•·I-----------------------I------------~------------~--------~--------~---······················ ■ ■ I I I I I ■ ■ I I I I I
-------s----····················=-----------------------1------------~------------~--------~--------~------------------------- • ■ I I I I I ■ ■ I I I I I
-------s------------------------1-----------------------1------------~------------~--------~--------~------------------------- • ■ I I I I I ■ ■ I I I I I
-------s----····················~----------------------~-----------4-----------4--------~--------~------------------------- Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 215
I I
I
I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
----------------------------:---------------------------~---------------- I I
I
-------------1---------T--------------
1 I
------------ :1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
------------ •1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
---- ----- --- .1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
-------------1---------T--------------
1 I
------------ :1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
------------ •1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
---- ----- --- .1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
-------------1---------T--------------
1 I
------------ :1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
------------ •1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
---- ----- --- .1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
-------------1---------T--------------
1 I
------------ :1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
------------ •1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
---- ----- --- .1---------T••••••••••••••
I
I
-------------1---------T--------------
1 I
I I I
----------------------------~---------------------------1------------------ ~ ------------1---------------~--------------
3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 3.3074 0.0000 3.3074 0.5008 0.0000 0.5008 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 1.5513 1.5513 1.4411 1.4411 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 3.3074 1.5513 4.8588 0.5008 1.4411 1.9419 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 458.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 801.00 143.00 0.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 160.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 216
• I I I I I I I I I
• I I I I I I I I I ----------------:---------------~----------l----------~----------l-----------t----------~----------1--------------1----------~---------- • I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ----------------:---------------~----------l----------~----------l-----------t----------~----------1--------------1----------~---------- • I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ----------------:---------------~----------l----------~----------l-----------t----------~----------1--------------1----------~---------- • I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ----------------:---------------~----------l----------~----------l-----------t----------~----------1--------------1----------~---------- • I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I ················~---------------l-----------~---------+---------~-----------l-----------~----------l---------------1-----------!-••·--·---- ■ ■
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -•-----•--•n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
I
3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.1273 4.0952 0.9602 0.0119 0.2669 0.0126 0.2795 0.0732 0.0120 0.0852 1,292.241 3 1,292.241
3 0.0877 1,294.433
7 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0487 0.0313 0.4282 1.1800e0030.1141 9.5000e0040.1151 0.0303 8.8000e0040.0311 117.2799 117.2799 3.5200e003117.3678 Total 0.1760 4.1265 1.3884 0.0131 0.3810 0.0135 0.3946 0.1034 0.0129 0.1163 1,409.521 2 1,409.521
2 0.0912 1,411.801
5 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 3.3074 0.0000 3.3074 0.5008 0.0000 0.5008 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 1.5513 1.5513 1.4411 1.4411 0.0000 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 3.3074 1.5513 4.8588 0.5008 1.4411 1.9419 0.0000 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 10 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 217
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
I
I
I
I
i
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
I
I
3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.1273 4.0952 0.9602 0.0119 0.2669 0.0126 0.2795 0.0732 0.0120 0.0852 1,292.241 3 1,292.241
3 0.0877 1,294.433
7 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0487 0.0313 0.4282 1.1800e0030.1141 9.5000e0040.1151 0.0303 8.8000e0040.0311 117.2799 117.2799 3.5200e003117.3678 Total 0.1760 4.1265 1.3884 0.0131 0.3810 0.0135 0.3946 0.1034 0.0129 0.1163 1,409.521 2 1,409.521
2 0.0912 1,411.801
5 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 2.0445 2.0445 1.8809 1.8809 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Total 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 18.0663 2.0445 20.1107 9.9307 1.8809 11.8116 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 11 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 218
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
I
I
I
I
i
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
I
I
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0584 0.0375 0.5139 1.4100e0030.1369 1.1400e0030.1381 0.0363 1.0500e0030.0374 140.7359 140.7359 4.2200e003140.8414 Total 0.0584 0.0375 0.5139 1.4100e0030.1369 1.1400e0030.1381 0.0363 1.0500e0030.0374 140.7359 140.7359 4.2200e003140.8414 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 2.0445 2.0445 1.8809 1.8809 0.0000 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Total 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 18.0663 2.0445 20.1107 9.9307 1.8809 11.8116 0.0000 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 219
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
I
I
I
'
' I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
I
I
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0584 0.0375 0.5139 1.4100e0030.1369 1.1400e0030.1381 0.0363 1.0500e0030.0374 140.7359 140.7359 4.2200e003140.8414 Total 0.0584 0.0375 0.5139 1.4100e0030.1369 1.1400e0030.1381 0.0363 1.0500e0030.0374 140.7359 140.7359 4.2200e003140.8414 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 1.9853 1.9853 1.8265 1.8265 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Total 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 8.6733 1.9853 10.6587 3.5965 1.8265 5.4230 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 13 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 220
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
I
I
I
'
' I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
I
I
3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0649 0.0417 0.5710 1.5700e0030.1521 1.2700e0030.1534 0.0404 1.1700e0030.0415 156.3732 156.3732 4.6900e003156.4904 Total 0.0649 0.0417 0.5710 1.5700e0030.1521 1.2700e0030.1534 0.0404 1.1700e0030.0415 156.3732 156.3732 4.6900e003156.4904 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 1.9853 1.9853 1.8265 1.8265 0.0000 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Total 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 8.6733 1.9853 10.6587 3.5965 1.8265 5.4230 0.0000 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 14 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 221
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
I
I
I
'
' I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
I
I
3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0649 0.0417 0.5710 1.5700e0030.1521 1.2700e0030.1534 0.0404 1.1700e0030.0415 156.3732 156.3732 4.6900e003156.4904 Total 0.0649 0.0417 0.5710 1.5700e0030.1521 1.2700e0030.1534 0.0404 1.1700e0030.0415 156.3732 156.3732 4.6900e003156.4904 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 8.6733 1.6349 10.3082 3.5965 1.5041 5.1006 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 15 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 222
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
I
I
I
'
' I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
I
I
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0607 0.0376 0.5263 1.5100e0030.1521 1.2300e0030.1534 0.0404 1.1300e0030.0415 150.8754 150.8754 4.2400e003150.9813 Total 0.0607 0.0376 0.5263 1.5100e0030.1521 1.2300e0030.1534 0.0404 1.1300e0030.0415 150.8754 150.8754 4.2400e003150.9813 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 0.0000 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 8.6733 1.6349 10.3082 3.5965 1.5041 5.1006 0.0000 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 16 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 223
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
I
I
I
'
' I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
I
I
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0607 0.0376 0.5263 1.5100e0030.1521 1.2300e0030.1534 0.0404 1.1300e0030.0415 150.8754 150.8754 4.2400e003150.9813 Total 0.0607 0.0376 0.5263 1.5100e0030.1521 1.2300e0030.1534 0.0404 1.1300e0030.0415 150.8754 150.8754 4.2400e003150.9813 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 224
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• - I I I I I I I
- I I I I I I I
- I I I I I I I
- I I I I I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I I '
' II I
I
I
I
I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.4079 13.2032 3.4341 0.0364 0.9155 0.0248 0.9404 0.2636 0.0237 0.2873 3,896.548 2 3,896.548
2 0.2236 3,902.138
4 Worker 2.4299 1.5074 21.0801 0.0607 6.0932 0.0493 6.1425 1.6163 0.0454 1.6617 6,042.558 5 6,042.558
5 0.1697 6,046.800
0 Total 2.8378 14.7106 24.5142 0.0971 7.0087 0.0741 7.0828 1.8799 0.0691 1.9490 9,939.106 7 9,939.106
7 0.3933 9,948.938
4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 225
' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' II I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• --
' ' ' '
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.4079 13.2032 3.4341 0.0364 0.9155 0.0248 0.9404 0.2636 0.0237 0.2873 3,896.548 2 3,896.548
2 0.2236 3,902.138
4 Worker 2.4299 1.5074 21.0801 0.0607 6.0932 0.0493 6.1425 1.6163 0.0454 1.6617 6,042.558 5 6,042.558
5 0.1697 6,046.800
0 Total 2.8378 14.7106 24.5142 0.0971 7.0087 0.0741 7.0828 1.8799 0.0691 1.9490 9,939.106 7 9,939.106
7 0.3933 9,948.938
4 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 226
' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' II I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• --
' ' ' '
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.3027 10.0181 3.1014 0.0352 0.9156 0.0116 0.9271 0.2636 0.0111 0.2747 3,773.876 2 3,773.876
2 0.1982 3,778.830
0 Worker 2.2780 1.3628 19.4002 0.0584 6.0932 0.0479 6.1411 1.6163 0.0441 1.6604 5,821.402 8 5,821.402
8 0.1529 5,825.225
4 Total 2.5807 11.3809 22.5017 0.0936 7.0088 0.0595 7.0682 1.8799 0.0552 1.9350 9,595.279 0 9,595.279
0 0.3511 9,604.055
4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 227
' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' II I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• --
' ' ' '
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.3027 10.0181 3.1014 0.0352 0.9156 0.0116 0.9271 0.2636 0.0111 0.2747 3,773.876 2 3,773.876
2 0.1982 3,778.830
0 Worker 2.2780 1.3628 19.4002 0.0584 6.0932 0.0479 6.1411 1.6163 0.0441 1.6604 5,821.402 8 5,821.402
8 0.1529 5,825.225
4 Total 2.5807 11.3809 22.5017 0.0936 7.0088 0.0595 7.0682 1.8799 0.0552 1.9350 9,595.279 0 9,595.279
0 0.3511 9,604.055
4 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 228
' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
' ' ' '
i
' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
' '
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0427 0.0255 0.3633 1.0900e0030.1141 9.0000e0040.1150 0.0303 8.3000e0040.0311 109.0150 109.0150 2.8600e003109.0866 Total 0.0427 0.0255 0.3633 1.0900e0030.1141 9.0000e0040.1150 0.0303 8.3000e0040.0311 109.0150 109.0150 2.8600e003109.0866 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 229
' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..
' ' ' '
i
' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• :: i
' '
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0427 0.0255 0.3633 1.0900e0030.1141 9.0000e0040.1150 0.0303 8.3000e0040.0311 109.0150 109.0150 2.8600e003109.0866 Total 0.0427 0.0255 0.3633 1.0900e0030.1141 9.0000e0040.1150 0.0303 8.3000e0040.0311 109.0150 109.0150 2.8600e003109.0866 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 23 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 230
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ..
..