1. Development Impact Fee Study — Anaheim City Council, March 24, 2026

w
w
w.F
inance
DTA
.com
Public Finance
Public
-
Private Partnerships
Development
Economics
Clean Energy Bonds

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE

JUSTIFICATION STUDY

CITY OF ANAHEIM
February
12 , 2026

www.FinanceDTA.com
18201 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 220
Irvine, CA 92612

CITY OF ANAHEIM

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE JUSTIFICATION STUDY
Prepared for:

City of Anaheim
200 South Anaheim Boulevard
Anaheim, CA 92805

TABLE

OF CONTENT
S

SECTION
PAGE
I

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
................................
...................
1 A
Organization of The Report
................................
.............
1 B
Impact Fee Summary
................................
.........................
2 II

INTRODUCTION
................................
..............................
4 III

LEGAL REQUIREMENTS
................................
.................
6 IV

DEMOGRAPHICS
................................
...........................
11 A
Existing Development within the City
.........................
12 B
Future Development within the City (20
24 -
2045)
....
1 2
C
EDU Projections
................................
................................
14 V

FEE CALCULATIONS
................................
.....................
21 A
Police Facilities
................................
................................
..
21 B
Fire Facilities
................................
................................
......
27 C
Library Facilities
................................
................................
35 D
Park Facilities
................................
................................
.....
4 2
V
I

IMPLEMENTATION OF FEES
................................
.......
4 6
V
II
FEE

SUMMARY
................................
................................
5 1

APPENDICES

APPENDIX A

DEMOGRAPHICS SUMMARY

APPENDIX B

REPORT REGARDING FAIR MARKET

LAND VALUE

APPENDIX C

FEE MODELS

1 SECTION I

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

City of Anaheim
February
1 2
, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

www.FinanceDTA.com
I

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
T
o adequately plan for new development and identify the public facilities and costs associated with mitigating the direct and cumulative impacts of new development, DTA (formerly David Taussig and Associates) was retained by the
City of
Anaheim
(the “City”) to
update the existing impact fee program by preparing a new AB 1600 and Quimby Act
Fee
Justification Study (the “Fee Study”). The Fee Study is intended to comply with Section
66477
et seq.
of the Government Code (Quimby Act for parks facilities) which was enacted by the
State of California in 19
65 and
Section 66000
et seq.
of the Government Code
(for police,
fire, and library facilities)
which was enacted by the State of California in 1987, by identifying additional public facilities required by new development (“Future Facilities”) and determining the level of fees that may be imposed to pay the costs of the Future Facilities.

The
f
ee amounts to be determined will finance
Police, Fire, Library,
and
Parks
at levels
identified by the various City de
partments as necessary to meet the needs of new
development through
2045
.

The Future Facilities and associated construction costs are identified
o
n the
City’s
Needs List
for police, fire, and library facilities
, which is included
in
Section V of the Fee
S
tudy.

Future
f
acilities for parks shall be funded through the impact fee pursuant to the Quimby Act.

A description of the methodology used to calculate the fees is included in Section VI.

The purpose of this report i
s
to ensure that all new development
s
mitigate
their
direct and cumulative impacts
by
pay
ing
the
ir
“fair share” of the cost of the
new infrastructure through the development fee program.

A
Organization of The Report
This Development Impact Fee
Study R
eport will be presented in the following s
even
(
7 )
sections:

Section I contains an Executive Summary
a brief introduction to the report
and
an
overview of the
updated
fees.

Section II of this report introduces the study
,
including a brief description of
the
City
’s
surroundings and background information on development fee financing.

Section III provides an overview of the legal requirements for implementing and imposing the fee amounts identified in the Fee Study. Included is a discussion of the findings required under the Mitigation Fee Act
and Quimby Act
and
the
requirements
necessary to be satisfied when establishing, increasing ,
or imposing a fee as a
condition of new development, and satisfies the nexus requirements for each facility included as part of this study.

Section IV includes a discussion of land use characteristics for
projected new
development and demand variables such as population
and
the number of housing
units
and non
-
residential building square feet
,
assuming current growth trends in
housing, commercial, and industrial development extrapolated through 2045
.
2 SECTION I

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

City of Anaheim
February
1 2
, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

www.FinanceDTA.com

Section V includes a description of the Needs List, which identifies the facilities needed to serve new development through
buildout
in
2045
that are eligible for
funding by the impact fees
for police, fire, and library facilities
. The Needs List
provides the total estimated facilities costs, offsetting revenues, net costs to the City ,
and costs allocated to new development for all facilities listed in the Needs List.

This
section also
describes
the methodology used to determine the fees for all facility t
ypes and presents the fees for each of the land types
.

Future
f
acilities for parks shall
be funded through the impact fee pursuant to the Quimby Act.

Section VI presents
a summary of the implementation of
the
development impact
fee
s.

Section
VII
presents a summary of the
development impact fee
s.

This report include
s
an appendix section presenting the calculations used to determine the findings presented in this report.

Appendix A includes the
demographics summary
.

Appendix
B
includes the
report
on
fair market land value prepared by
Keyser Marston
Associates
.

Appendix
C
includes the calculations used to determine the various fee levels .

B
Impact Fee Summary
B.1.

Fee Amounts by Land Use
The total fee amounts
for each land use
are summarized in Table ES
-
1 below. Fees
presented in this study reflect the maximum fee levels that may be imposed on new development
.

Table
ES
-
1:

Development Impact Fee
Summary
Land Use
Police
Fire
Library
Parks *
Administrative
Total
Residential (other than ADUs)
$1,
128.70
$
759.83
$1,610.48
$45,777.38
$24
6 .
38 $49,
522
.
77 per Unit
Accessory Dwelling Unit
As determined pursuant to Section I.B.2 below
Retail/Commercial
$1,
288
.
30 $867.27
$384.46
$0.00
$1
2 .
70 $2,
552
.
72 per KSF
Office
$
1 ,
80 8.1
3 $1,217.22
$539.59
$0.00
$1
7 .8
2 $3,
582
.
77 per KSF
Industrial
$1,
198
.
41 $806.76
$357.60
$0.00
$
11 .
81 $2,
374
.
59 per KSF
Hotel/Motel
$
257
.
66 $173.45
$76.87
$0.00
$2.
54 $5
10 .
52 per Room
*Parks fee shown is for a
single family residential
unit. Please see Section V.D. herein for the
parks
fee for
additional residential land uses.

B.2.

Fee Amount for Accessory Dwelling Units
P
ursuant to Government Code Section
66324
,
Accessory Dwelling Unit
s
(“ADU
(s)
”)
are
exempt from incurring impact fees from local agencies, special districts, and water 3 SECTION I

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

City of Anaheim
February
1 2
, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

www.FinanceDTA.com
corporations if such unit is less than 750 square feet. If an ADU is 750 square feet or larger, impact fees shall be charged proportionately in relation to the square footage of the ADU to the square footage of the primary dwelling unit.

For instance, the proportionate share for an ADU of 800 square feet located on the same lot as a primary residence of 2,500 square feet is equal to 32.00%. The impact fee for such ADU is equal to $
15,
847
.
29 (32.00% multiplied by $
49,
522
.
77 indicated
above).
4 SECTION II

INTRODUCTION

City of Anaheim
February
1 2
, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

www.FinanceDTA.com
II

INTRODUCTION
T
o adequately plan for new development and identify the
Future Facilities
and costs associated
with mitigating
its
direct and cumulative impacts of new development
s
,
the City retained
DTA
to prepare an updated AB 1600 Fee Justification Study (the “Fee Study”). For this study, DTA update
d
all
d
evelopment
i
mpact
f
ees
based on
updated
development
information
and
City
facilities.

More specifically,
t
he Fee Study is intended to comply with Section
666477
et seq.
of the
Government Code (Quimby Act for parks facilities)
which was enacted by the State of
California in 19
65 and Section 66000
et seq.
of the Government Code (for police, fire, and
library facilities)
which was enacted by the State of California in 1987
, by identifying Future
Facilities and determining the level of fees that may be imposed to pay the costs of the Future Facilities. Fee amounts have been determined
to
finance facilities at leve
ls identified by the
various City departments as necessary to meet the needs of new development.

This report does not address, nor has DTA been asked to determine, whether any current or proposed development impact fees are valid under the U.S. Constitution’s Fifth Amendment Takings Clause.

In Sheetz v. County of El Dorado
(2024)
U.S., the U.S. Supreme
Court held that its decisions in Nollan v. California Coastal Comm’n (1987) 483 U.S. 825 and
Dolan v. City of Tigard
(1994) 512 U.S. 374 apply to legislatively imposed conditions on land -
use permits.

However,
the Supreme Court left it to the California
appellate court on remand
to address the validity of the traffic impact fee at issue in the case and determine how to apply Nollan/Dolan in this context.

DTA cannot predict how courts will resolve such issues
in the future and is providing no services
n
or guarantees of any kind concerning the validity
of any impact fees under the U.S. Constitution’s Fifth Amendment Takings Clause.

The Future Facilities and associated construction costs are identified in the Needs List, which is included in Section V of the Fee Study.

Under the deve
lopment fee program, a
ll new
development may be required to pay its “fair share” of the cost of Future Facilities
.

The
police, fire, and library
fees are calculated to fund the cost of facilities needed to meet the needs of new development.

Future
f
acilities for parks shall be funded through the impact fee pursuant to the Quimby Act.

The steps followed in the Fee Study include:

1. Demographic Assumptions
: Identify future growth that represents the increased
facility demand
.

2. Facility Needs and Costs
: Identify
Future Facilities
required to support the new
development and the costs of such facilities. Facilities costs and the Needs List are discussed in Section V
.

The police, fire, and library facilities impact fees
are
based on
the City’s current L
evel
O
f
S
ervice (“LOS”)
or on the City’s list of needed facilities
(“Needs List”) as described further herein.

For purposes of complying with AB 602,
the Needs Lists shown herein
is considered to be the CIP.

Future
f
acilities for parks
shall be funded through the impact fee pursuant t
o the Quimby Act.
5 SECTION II

INTRODUCTION

City of Anaheim
February
1 2
, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

www.FinanceDTA.com

3. Cost Allocation
: Allocate costs per
Equivalent Dwelling Unit
(“EDU”)
.

4. Fee Schedule
: Calculate the fee per residential unit
,
or non
-
residential square foot
,
or
in
another
specific unit of measurement.

The park fee is calculated pursuant to the Quimby Act as described further in Section V.D.

This Fee Study
uses
a planning hori
z
on of 2045 for all projections
of demographic growth
and the future facilities needed. To ensure
that
the
fee
structure
m
eets
the
nexus
requirements
of
Section 66001
a
nd ensure
the
fees
are
proportionate
to
the
impacts
generated
by
the
various
land
uses, this
Fee Study
u
ses
an
Equivalent
Dwelling Unit ("EDU")
m
ethod
to
fa
i
rly
allocate costs
to
n
e
w development
and
determine
the
appropriate
fee
levels
that
will provide
a
source
of
funds
to pay for the proposed facilities. A more detailed
discussion regarding the EDU methodology
can be found in Section IV(
C
).

Application of
the
E
D
U
methodo
l
ogy
depends
u
p
on
reasonable
choices
of
variables
that
adequately
measure
demand
for respective
f
a
cilities ("demand
variable").

Table
I
I
-
1 summarizes
t
h
e demand variables used in this Fee Study.

Table
II
-
1 :

Demand Variables
Facility
C
at
e
gory
Demand Variable
Police
Population
and Emplo
y
ees
Fire
Population
and Emplo
y
ees
Library
Population
and
Adjusted
Employees
Section V of this Fee Study provides detailed analyses of the Needs List for police, fire, and
library facilities
, allocation of costs to new development
,
and calculation of fee structures
for
police, fire,
library,
and
park
facilities.

As described in
Section V
I,
an administrative
component of 0
.5
% of the
aggregate
fee amount
is added
to pay for the City's overhead
costs incurred in
administering
the Fee program.

6 SECTION III

LEGAL REQUIREMENTS

City of Anaheim
February
1 2
, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

www.FinanceDTA.com
III

LEGAL REQUIREMENTS
The levy of impact fees is one authorized method of financing Future Facilities
necessary
to mitigate the impacts of new development. A fee is “a monetary exaction, other than a tax or special assessment, which
a local agency
charge
s
to the applicant in connection
with approval of a development project for the purpose of defraying all or a portion of the cost of public facilities related to the development project...” (California Government Code, Section 66000).

A fee may be levied for each type of capital improvement required for new development .

The typical fee is paid
prior to the beginning of construction of a dwelling unit or non -
residential building. Fees are often levied at final map recordation, issuance of a certificate of occupancy, or
,
more commonly, at building permit issuance.

AB 1600, which created Section 66000
et seq.
of the Government Code
,
was enacted by
the State of California in 1987
and is described in further detail in Section
III.

A below.

Section III.A applies to the fees calculated for police, fire, and library facilities.

California Government Code Section 66477 (the "Quimby Act") is described in further
detail in Section III.B below and applies to the fees calculated for parks facilities.

Assembly Bill (“AB”) 602 is described in further detail in Section III.C below and applies to police, fire, library, and parks facilities.

A
Government Code Section 66001
In 2006, Government Code Section 66001 was amended to clarify that a fee cannot include costs attributable to existing deficiencies but can fund costs used to maintain the existing level of service (“LOS”) or meet an adopted level of service consistent wit h the
general plan.

Section 66000
et seq.
of the Government Code thus requires that all public agencies satisfy the following requirements when establishing, increasing, or imposing a fee as a condition of new development:

1. Identify the purpose of the fee. [Government Code Section 66001(a)(1)]

2. Identify the use to which the fee will be put. [Government Code Section 66001(a)(2)]

3. Determine that there is a reasonable relationship between the fee’s use and the type of development on which the fee is to be imposed. [Government Code Section 66001(a)(3)]

4. Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is to be imposed. [Government Code Section 66001(a)(4)]

5. Discuss how there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and 7 SECTION III

LEGAL REQUIREMENTS

City of Anaheim
February
1 2
, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

www.FinanceDTA.com
the cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed.

This section presents these items as they relate to the imposition of the f
ees in the City.

1. PURPOSE OF THE FEE
[
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66001(A)(1)
]

New residential and non
-
residential development within the City will generate
additional residents and employees
requiring
additional public facilities. Land
for these facilities will have to be acquired
,
and public facilities and equipment
will have to be expanded, constructed, or purchased to meet this increased demand.

It is the projected direct and cumulative effect of future residential and non -
residential development that has required the preparation of this Fee Study.

Each new residential and non
-
residential property will contribute to the need
for new police, fire,
and library facilities, and, as such, the impact fee will be charged to all future development, irrespective of location, within the City.

While a portion of the City’s future development might be characterized as “in fill” development projects, these p
rojects contribute to impacts on public
facilities because they are an interactive component of a much greater universe of development located throughout the City. First, the residents associated with any new residential development and the employees asso
ciated with any non
-
residential development in the City have access to, and in fact, may regularly utilize and benefit from, the City’s police, fire, and library facilities. Second, these residents and employees may have chosen to purchase the specific pi ece of
property in which they reside and/or work partially because of the police, fire, and library opportunities located nearby. Third, the availability of such facilities throughout the City has a growth
-
inducing impact, in that it enhances the City’s
r
eputation as a great place to live and work, thereby attracting new development, particularly non
-
residential development, that may have
otherwise gone elsewhere. As a result, all development projects in the City contribute to the cumulative need for new
police, fire, and library facilities
throughout the City.

The impact fees will be used
to
acquire
, install, and construct public facilities
identified on the Needs Lists
,
mitigat
ing
the direct and cumulative impacts of
new development in the City.

2. THE USE TO WHICH THE FEE IS TO BE PUT
[

GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
66001(A)(2)
]
The
police, fire, and library
fee will be used for the acquisition, installation, and construction of the public facilities identified on the Needs Lists for such fees
,
included in Section V of the Fee Study
,
and other appropriate costs to mitigate
8 SECTION III

LEGAL REQUIREMENTS

City of Anaheim
February
1 2
, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

www.FinanceDTA.com
the direct and cumulative impacts of new development in the City. The fee will provide a source of revenue to the City to allow for the acquisition, installation, and construction of
needed
public facilities, which in turn will both preserve the quality of life in the City and protect the health, safety, and welfare of the existing and future residents and employees.

3. DETERMINE THAT THERE IS A REASONABLE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE FEE’S USE AND THE TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT PROJECT UPON WHICH THE

FEE IS IMPOSED (BENEFIT RELATIONSHIP)
[

GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
66001(A)(3)
]
As discussed in Section
III.

A, the projected direct and cumulative effect of future development has prompted the preparation of the Fee Study. Each development will contribute to the need for new public facilities.

Furthermore, w
ithout future
development, the City would no
t
need to construct many of the public facilities
on the Needs List.

T
he costs
of such new facilities
have been allocated to both
existing and new development based on their level of benefit.

Consequently, all
new residential and non
-
re
sidential development within the City, irrespective of
location, contributes to the direct and cumulative impacts of development on police, fire, and l
ibrary facilities and creates the need for new public facilities to accommodate growth
.

The
police, fire, and library
fees will be expended for the acquisition, installation, and construction of the public facilities identified on the Needs List for such fees
and other authorized uses, as that is the purpose for which the fee is collected.

As previously stated, all new development
direct
ly
impact
s
public facilities or
contributes to the cumulative impact on public facilities. Moreover, this impact is
generally equalized among all types of development because it is the
result of
increased dem
ands for public facilities created by future residents and employees.

For the reasons
above
,
there is a reasonable relationship between
the
design,
acquisition, construction, and installation of the facilities on the Needs Lists for
police, fire, and library fees
and new development.

4. DETERMINE HOW THERE IS A REASONABLE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE

NEED FOR THE PUBLIC FACILITY AND THE TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

UPON WHICH THE FEE IS IMPOSED (IMPACT RELATIONSHIP)
[

GOVERNMENT
CODE SECTION 66001(A)(4)
]
As previously stated, all new development
within the City, irrespective of
location,
contributes to the direct and cumulative
impacts
of development
on
police, fire, and library
facilities.

Moreover, the
police, fire, and library
facilities
identified in
Section V
are specifically a function of the number of projected
residents/employees
within the
City
and do not reflect any unmet needs of
existing development
.
9 SECTION III

LEGAL REQUIREMENTS

City of Anaheim
February
1 2
, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

www.FinanceDTA.com
For the reasons presented herein, there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facilities included on the Needs List and all new development within the City.

5. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE AMOUNT OF THE FEE AND THE COST OF

THE PUBLIC FACILITIES ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE DEVELOPMENT UPON WHICH THE FEE IS IMPOSED (“ROUGH PROPORTIONALITY” RELATIONSHIP) [
GOVERNMENT CODE 66001(A)
]
This Fee Study demonstrates how there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed. As set forth above, all new
construction in the City impacts police, fire, and library facilities. Moreover, each individual development project and its related increase in population and/or employment, along with the cumulative impacts of all development in the City, will adversel
y impact existing facilities. Thus,
imposition of the fee to finance
Future Facilities
is an efficient and practical
method of permitting development to proceed in a responsible manner .

New development impacts facilities directly and cumulatively. Without any future development, the acquisition, construction, and/or installation of new facilities would not be necessary as existing City facilities are generally adequate. Even new develop
ment located adjacent to existing facilities will
utilize and benefit from
the
Future Facilities
.

Based on the analyses contained in Section V
I
I
, t
he fee amounts are roughly
proportional to the impacts resulting from new development. Thus, there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the facilities.

B
California Government Code Section 66477
The Quimby Act
allows the City, by ordinance, to require the dedication of land or the payment of in
-
lieu fees, or a combination of both, for park or recreational purposes as a condition of subdivision map approval
.

The amount of the land to be dedicated or the
fee to be imposed in lieu thereof is limited by statute and must be based on policies and standards contained in an adopted general or specific plan .

C
Assembly Bill (“AB”) 602
The impact fees
for police, fire, and library
included herein
were circumscribed by the
requirements of AB 602, which was approved by the California State Legislature and signed by Governor Newsom in 2021.

Among the significant impacts of AB 602 are the
following:

On or after January 1, 2022, fee justification studies must identify the existing Level of Service (“LOS”) for each public facility,
determine
the new LOS,
and (if
the
10 SECTION III

LEGAL REQUIREMENTS

City of Anaheim
February
1 2
, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

www.FinanceDTA.com
new LOS is greater than
the
existing LOS) include an explanation of why the new
LOS is necessary.

For housing development projects, nexus studies adopted after July 1, 2022, must calculate t
he fees based on
the
square footage
of proposed units of the
development unless the local agency demonstrates that another metric is more appropriate
.

The bill authorizes any member of the public, including an applicant for a development project, to submit evidence that the city, county, or other local agency had failed to comply with the Mitigation Fee Act. The bill requires the legislative body of the
city, county, or other local agency to consider any timely submitted evidence and authorize the legislative body to change or adjust the fee or fee increase as specified.

Large jurisdictions (county population greater than 250,000) and cities within those counties must adopt a capital improvement plan
(“CIP”)
as part of the nexus
study.

Nexus studies shall be updated at least every 8 years from January 1, 2023.

11 SECTION I
V

DEMOGRAPHICS

City of Anaheim
February
1 2
, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

www.FinanceDTA.com
IV

DEMOGRAPHICS
T
o determine the public facilities needed to serve new development and
establish fee
amounts to fund such
public
facilities, DTA worked closely with the City to establish projections of future population, employees
,
and development within the City. The City of
Anaheim is primarily built
-
out
,
and very little future
growth
will occur on land that is
currently undeveloped.

Future development will primarily result from intensification and/or redevelopment of existing land uses. For purposes of projecting futu re population and
employment growth, the City categorizes developable land uses as residential and non -
residential property. Non
-
residential property is further categorized into Hotel/Motel, Office, Retail/Commercial, and Industrial uses. Based on these designations, DTA
established fees for the following
six
(
6 ) land use categories to acknowledge the difference
in impacts resulting from various land uses and to make the resulting fee program implementable.

Please note
two
Residential Property categor
ies
are
utilized in the fee study
because the City has determined that the variation between additional
residential
development types across the City is relatively minor.

A
summary of the land use classes
utilized in this fee study
is
included in the table below. However, not all fees will apply to all land uses.

Table
IV
-
1 : Summary of Land Use Categories
Land Use Classification Fee Study
Definition
All Residential
(other than Accessory
Dwelling Units)
Includes, but is not limited to, buildings used as the following:

Single
-
family detached homes
;

Buildings with attached residential units including
apartments
;
townhomes, condominiums
; and

Mobile
h
omes
Accessory Dwelling Units
Includes detached units that serve as a secondary living space on the same lot as a primary residence that can provide independent living for one or more people.

Hotel/Motel

Hotel/Motel rooms
Office
Includes, but is not limited to, buildings used as the following:

Business/professional office
; and

Professional medical
offices and hospitals
Retail/Commercial
Includes, but is not limited to, buildings used as the following:

Retail
;

Service
-
oriented business activities
;

Department stores, discount stores, furniture/appliance outlets, home improvement centers
;

Entertainment centers
;

Commercial recreation
;

Private amusement area
;

Neighborhood center
;

Subregional and regional shopping centers
;

Automobile dealerships
; and

Service
-
oriented commercial activities
12 SECTION I
V

DEMOGRAPHICS

City of Anaheim
February
1 2
, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

www.FinanceDTA.com
Land Use Classification Fee Study
Definition
Industrial
Includes, but is not limited to, buildings used as the following:

Light manufacturing
; and

Warehouse/distribution, logistics, and wholesaling

The time horizon used for all fees is through the year 2045.

Demographics projections
reflect the general plan build out for 2045 prepared in conjunction with the
2024/2025 City
of
Anaheim
General Plan
approved by the City Council in April 2025
.

As part of the General
Plan approval process, the
environmental analysis
will be available
for public review in
December
2024, followed by City
Planning Commission
approval expected
in March
2025,
and Council approval of the General Plan expected in
May
2025.

An overview of City development will be presented as follows:

Section
A
summarizes the existing development in the City.

Section
B
below summarizes the future development in the City through the year 2045.

S
ection
C
below summarizes the EDU methodology used in all fee calculations.

A
Existing
Development within the City
A.1
Residential Development (for all fees except Parks)
According to information
provided by the City
, there were
340,160
residents residing
in
113,172
residential units within the City as of January 1, 20
24 .

The City is unable
to determine how many units are considered ADUs.

A.2
Residential Development (for Parks Fee)
The parks fee is calculated pursuant to the methodology described in the Quimby Act
.

T
herefore, the existing development information used for the parks fee is based on
333,694
existing residents and
109,759
existing residential units as indicated in
the 20
2 3
United States Census Data.

A.3
Non
-
Residential Development
In terms of non
-
residential development,
the City
is
estimated to
have
24,270
existing
Hotel/Motel rooms, approximately

27.7 million square feet of existing
Retail/Commercial development, 4.1
million square feet of existing Office
development, and

48.4 million square feet of existing Industrial development within the City, as discussed previously. The existing Hotel/Motel rooms and non -
residential building square feet are derived from the City’s GIS database.

In terms of employees,
the City
utilized square
-
foot
-
per
-
employee factors of
400,
285
, and 430 building square feet per employee for
Retail/Commercial,
Office,
and
13 SECTION I
V

DEMOGRAPHICS

City of Anaheim
February
1 2
, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

www.FinanceDTA.com
Industrial uses, respectively, as indicated in the General Plan, Table LU -
6:

Non
-
Residential
Buildout
Estimates.

For Hotel/Motel rooms, a factor of 0.5
employees per Hotel/Motel room was used based on aggregated employee data from Inside Prospects Inc.

Applying these factors to the existing non
-
residential
development results in
69,239 existing Retail/Commercial employees, 14,605
existing
Office employees,
112,671
existing Industrial employees
, and 12,135 existing
Hotel/Motel employees
within the City.

The table
below summarizes the existing non
-
residential development within the
City.

Table
IV
-
1 : Estimated Existing Non
-
Residential Development
Non
-
Residential Property
Existing
Building
Square Feet
o
r
Rooms
(20
24 )
Existing Square Feet
or
Rooms
per Employee
Existing Employees
(20
24 )
Hotel/Motel
24,270 rooms
2 rooms/emp.
12,135 employees
Retail/Commercial
27,695,600 sq. ft.
400 sq. ft./emp.
69,239 employees
Office
4,162,425 sq. ft.
285 sq. ft./emp.
14,605 employees
Industrial
48,448,530 sq. ft.
430 sq. ft./emp.
112,671 employees
Total
80,306,555
sq. ft.

N/A
208,650
employees
B
Future
Development within the City (20
24 -
2045)
T
his section describes development through 2045. These fee calculations rely on the development information related to population, residential dwelling units, employees, and non
-
residential building square feet as described below.

B.1
Residential Development
(2024
-
2045)
The City
estimates that there
will
be
431,340
residents and
154,801
residential units
in the year 2045. Therefore, the City will have a population increase of 91,180
new
residents and growth in residential development of
41,629
new dwelling units from
20 24
through 2045.

The City is unable to determine how many units are considered ADUs.

The table
below summarizes the future demographics for residential property through 2045.

Table
IV
-
2 : Estimated Residential Development (20
24 -
2045
)
Residential Property
Future (20
24 -
2045)
Total in Year 2045
Dwelling Units
41,629
154,801
Residents
91,180
431,340
14 SECTION I
V

DEMOGRAPHICS

City of Anaheim
February
1 2
, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

www.FinanceDTA.com
The City is unable to determine how many units are considered ADUs .

B.2
Non
-
Residential Development
(2024
-
2045)
In terms of non
-
residential property,
the City
estimates
that
new development will
include
20,576
new Hotel/Motel rooms,

6.1 million
building square feet of new
Retail/Commercial development,

1. 3
million
building square feet of new Office
development, and
1 5
.
2 million
building square feet of
new
Industrial property within
the City
by
the year 2045.

In terms of employees,
the City
utilized the same square
-
foot
-
per
-
employee factors
as indicated in Section
A.3
above. This results in
10,288
new Hotel/Motel employees,
15,281
new Retail/Commercial employees,
4,590
new Office employees, and
35,404
new
Industrial employees within the City.

The table
below summarizes the future demographics for the non
-
residential land
uses through the year 2045.

Table
IV
-
3 : Estimated Future Non
-
Residential Development (20
24 through Year 2045)
Non
-
Residential
Property
Future Rooms or
Square Feet
(20
24 -
2045)
Total Rooms or
Square Feet
in Year 2045
Future
Employees
(20
24 -
2045)
Total
Employees
in Year 2045
Hotel/Motel
20,576
rooms
44,846
rooms
10,288
22,423
Retail/Commercial
6,112,400
sq. ft.
33,808,000
sq. ft.
15,281
84,520
Office
1,308,150
sq. ft.
5,470,575
sq. ft.
4,590
1 9,195
Industrial
15,223,720
sq. ft.
63,672,250
sq. ft.
35,404
14 8,075
Total
22,644,270
sq. ft.
102,950,825
sq. ft.
65,563
274,213

C
EDU Projections
EDUs are a means of quantifying different land uses in terms of their equivalence to a residential dwelling unit, where equivalence is measured in terms of potential infrastructure use or benefit for each type of public facility.

California Government Code §66001(4)(b) requires that there be a "...reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the public facility, or portion of the public facility, attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed." This
study uses an
EDU methodology
t
o ensure that a reasonable relationship is maintained within the fee structure, This approach uses, for given land uses, a method of comparison of that land use to a baseline land use using a common demand variable.

A demand variable is a measurable
factor directly related to the size of the public facility.

As stated earlier, fees are calculated for various land use categories.

Each land use has
different levels of demand for the new facilities depending upon the demand variable most closely related to
determining
the size,
and cost of the facility in question.

For instanc
e
,
15 SECTION I
V

DEMOGRAPHICS

City of Anaheim
February
1 2
, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

www.FinanceDTA.com
additional residents
and employees
resulting from growth in the various land uses will
generate demand for expanded library facilities in the existing library system ;
therefore
,
population
and employee
increase would be considered a reasonable common demand variable and the population growth from a new residence and employees per 1,000 building
square feet
would be used as the baseline.

The table
below shows the fee category, service factor, applicable land uses, and the timeframe for
calculating the EDUs
.

Table
IV
-
4 :

EDUs
Facility Type
Service Factor
Fee Charged to
Land Uses
Timeframe
Police
Residents
and Employees
Served
Res. and Non
-
Res
.
2045
Fire
Residents
and Employees
Served
Res. and Non
-
Res
.
2045
Library
Residents
and
Adjusted
Employees
Served
Res.
and Non
-
Res.
2045
Population and employees serve as key indicators of demand for public services because they directly contribute to and rely on the availability of such services. For instance, the number of residents and employees in a community influences the need for ess ential
services such as public safety. Changes in the population of residents and employees reflect shifts in service needs, making them crucial for forecasting and planning public services.

C.1
EDU Factors for Police and Fire Facilities
EDU factors
for each land use of existing development are shown in
Table
IV
-
5 below
(for police and fire facilities)
. All EDU factors are calculated assuming that 1.00 EDU is equivalent to one future residential unit with an average future
population density
of

2.19 residents
per unit as provided by the City.

Table
IV
-
5 :

EDU Factors for Existing Development (2024)
Residential Property
Units
Residents
per Unit
Existing
EDUs per
Unit
Existing
Residential
113,172 units

3.01 1.
372
Non
-
Residential Property
Non
-
Residential SF
/ Rooms
Employees
per 1,000
Non
-
Res. SF
/ Room
Existing
EDUs per
1,000 Non
-
Res. SF /
Room
Existing
Retail/Commercial
27,695,600 sq. ft.

2.50 1.
141
Existing
Office
4,162,425 sq. ft.

3.51 1.
602
Existing
Industrial
48,448,530 sq. ft.

2.33 1.
062
Existing
Hotel/Motel Property
24,270 rooms

0.50 0.2
28 T
he impact fees calculated herein for residential property are on a per -
unit basis.
16 SECTION I
V

DEMOGRAPHICS

City of Anaheim
February
1 2
, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

www.FinanceDTA.com
This is due to the fact that service demand for police, fire, and library facilities correlates closely to the number of residents in a home. Furthermore, the City has determined that, on average, there is no evidence that a larger home in the City corresp
onds to additional residents in the home. Therefore, a uniform per -
unit fee
best reflects the actual impact a new home will have on local police, fire, and library services
. Th
is
methodology is also consistent with the residential fee per unit for parks u
nder the Quimby Act.

Applying the EDU factors shown
in Table
IV
-
5 above
to the existing development
results in
250,564
total existing EDUs
,
as shown in Table
IV
-
6 below. For example,
for existing residential property
,
there are
155,303
EDUs
,
based on 1.
372
EDU
s
multiplied by
113,172
units.

Table
IV
-
6 :

Total EDUs for
Existing Development (2024)
Residential Property
Units
EDUs per Unit
Total
Existing
EDUs
Existing Residential
113,172 units

1. 372
1 55
,
303
Non
-
Residential Property
Rooms/Sq. Ft.

EDUs per
1,000 Sq.

Ft./Room
Total
Existing
EDUs
Existing Retail/Commercial
27,695,600 sq. ft.

1. 141
3 1
,6
12 Existing Office
4,162,425 sq. ft.

1. 602
6 ,
668
Existing Industrial
48,448,530 sq. ft.

1. 062
5 1
,
441
Existing Hotel/Motel Property
24,270 rooms

0. 228
5,
540
Total
N
/
A
N
/
A
250,564
EDU factors
for each land use of future development are calculated as shown in the table below
.

It is anticipated that future residential development within the City will consist of
more condensed housing units on average
, leading to a projected average
of 2.19 residents per unit, compared to
an average of

3.01 residents per unit in
prior
years
.

17 SECTION I
V

DEMOGRAPHICS

City of Anaheim
February
1 2
, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

www.FinanceDTA.com
Table
IV
-
7 :

EDU Factors for Future Development (2024
-
2045)
Residential Property
Units
Residents
per Unit
Future
EDUs
per Unit
Future
Residential
41,629
units

2. 19

1.000
Non
-
Residential Property
Non
-
Residential SF
/ Rooms
Employees
per 1,000
Non
-
Res. SF
/ Room
Future
EDUs
per
1,000
Non
-
Res. SF
/ Room
Future
Retail/Commercial
6 ,
112
,
400
sq. ft.

2.50 1.
141
Future
Office
1,
308
,
150
sq. ft.

3.51 1.
602
Future
Industrial
1 5
,
223
,
720
sq. ft.

2.33 1.
062
Future
Hotel/Motel Property
20,576
rooms

0.50 0.
228
Applying the EDU factors shown in Table
IV
-
7 above to the future development
results in
71 ,
562
future EDUs,
as shown in Table
IV
-
8 below. For example, for future
residential property
,
there is expected to be a total of
41,629
EDUs
,
which is based on

1.00 EDU multiplied by
41,629
units.

Table
IV
-
8 :

Future Development (2024
-
2045)
Residential Property
Units
EDUs per Unit
Total
Future
EDUs
Future Residential
41,629
units

1.000
41,629
Non
-
Residential Property
Rooms/Sq. Ft.

EDUs per 1,000
Sq. Ft./Room
Total
Future
EDUs
Future Retail/Commercial
6 ,1
12 ,
400
sq. ft.

1. 141
6,977
Future Office
1,
308
,
150
sq. ft.

1. 602
2,096
Future Industrial
1 5
,
223
,
720
sq. ft.

1. 062
16,164
Future Hotel/Motel Property
20,576
rooms

0.2 28
4,697
Total
N
/
A
N
/
A
71,562
Table
IV
-
9 below shows the total development and EDUs in Year 2045. This equals
the sum of the existing development/EDUs from Table
IV
-
6 and future
development/EDUs from Table
IV
-
8 .

18 SECTION I
V

DEMOGRAPHICS

City of Anaheim
February
1 2
, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

www.FinanceDTA.com
Table
IV
-
9 :

Total
Estimated
Development (2045)
Residential Property
Units
EDUs per
Unit
Total EDUs
Total Residential
154,801
units

1.272
196,932
Non
-
Residential Property
Rooms/Sq. Ft.

EDUs per
1,000 Sq.

Ft./Room
Total
EDUs
Total Retail/Commercial
33,808,000
sq. ft.

1.141
38,58
9 Total Office
5,470,575
sq. ft.

1.602
8,764
Total Industrial
63,672,250
sq. ft.

1. 062
67,605
Total Hotel/Motel Property
44,846
rooms

0.2 28
10,237
Total
N
/
A
N
/
A
322,12
7 C.2
EDU Factors for Library Facilities
For non
-
residential property applicable to Library facilities, an e
mployment
a
djustment
f
actor of 20.91% has been applied to the number of employees. This factor
is based on an analysis of the daily operating hours of library facilities in the City and the potential of such hours available to employees. The resulting factor indicates
that a resident typically generates roughly five times the demand for Library services than an employee does.

Please refer to Table IV
-
10 for existing
residents and
employee estimates
for non
-
residential land uses applicable to Library facilities.

Table
IV
-
1 0
: Estimated Existing Development
(2024)
1 Residential Property Existing
Units
Existing
Residents
Residents per
Unit Adjustment Factor
Existing
Residents
Served
Existing Residential Property
113,172 units
340,160

3.01 N/A
340,160
Non
-
Residential
Property
Existing
Building SF
/
Rooms
Existing
Employees
Employees
per 1,000
Sq. Ft.
/ Room
Employees per
1,000
Sq. Ft.
/ Room
(2
1 % Employment
Adjustment
Factor)
2 Existing
Employees
Served
Existing
Retail/Commercial
27,695,600
69,239

2.50 0.52
14,480
Existing
Office
4,162,425
14,605

3.51 0.73
3,054
Existing
Industrial
48,448,530
112,671

2.33 0.49
23,562
Existing
Hotel/Motel
24,270
12,135

0.50 0.10
2,538
Total
Non
-
Residential
N/A
208,650
N/A
N/A
43,634
Notes:

1. Some figures may not sum due to rounding.
19 SECTION I
V

DEMOGRAPHICS

City of Anaheim
February
1 2
, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

www.FinanceDTA.com

2. An Employment Adjustment Factor of 20.91% has been applied to the number of employees to capture the reduced levels of service demanded by employees for Library facilities.

Please see the calculation included in Appendix A herein.

Please refer to Table IV
-
1 1
f
or
total
existing
EDUs for
residential and
non
-
residential
land uses applicable to Library facilities.

Table
IV
-
1 1
:

Total EDUs for Existing Development (2024)
Residential Property
Units
EDUs per
Unit
Total
Existing
EDUs
Existing Residential
113,172
units

1. 372
1 55
,
303
Non
-
Residential Property
Rooms/Sq. Ft.

EDUs per
1,000 Sq.

Ft./Room
Total
Existing
EDUs
Existing Retail/Commercial
27,695,600 sq. ft.

0. 2
39 6
,
611
Existing Office
4,162,425 sq. ft.

0. 3
35 1,
394
Existing Industrial
48,448,530 sq. ft.

0. 2
22 1
0,757
Existing Hotel/Motel Property
24,270 rooms

0. 0
48 1,
159
Total
EDUs
N
/
A
N
/
A
1 75
,
224
Please refer to Table IV
-
1 2
f
or future
residents and
employee estimates applicable to
Library facilities.

Table IV
-
1 2
: Estimated Future Development
(2024
–
2045)
1 Residential Property Units Future
Residents
Residents per
Unit Adjustment Factor
Future
Residents
Served
Future Residential Property
41,629
91,180

2. 19
N/A
91,180
Non
-
Residential
Property
Future
Building SF
/
Rooms
Future
Employees
Employees
per 1,000
Sq.

Ft.
/ Room
Employees per
1,000
Sq. Ft.
/ Room
(2
1 % Employment
Adjustment
Factor)
2 Future
Employees
Served
Future
Retail/Commercial
6,112,400
15,281

2.50 0.52
3,196
Future
Office
1,308,150
4,590

3.51 0.73
960
Future
Industrial
15,223,720
35,404

2.33 0.49
7,404
Future
Hotel/Motel
20,576
10,288

0.50 0.10
2 ,
151
Total
Non
-
Residential
N/A
65,563
N/A
N/A
13,711
Notes:

1. Some figures may not sum due to rounding.

2. An Employment Adjustment Factor of 20.91% has been applied to the number of employees to capture the reduced levels of service demanded by employees for Library facilities.

Please see the calculation included in Appendix A herein. 20 SECTION I
V

DEMOGRAPHICS

City of Anaheim
February
1 2
, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

www.FinanceDTA.com
P
lease refer to Table IV
-
1 3
for total future EDUs for
residential and
non
-
residential
land uses applicable to Library facilities.

Table
IV
-
1 3
:

Future Development (2024
-
2045)
Residential Property
Units
EDUs
per Unit
Total
Future
EDUs
Future Residential Property
41,629
units

1.000
41,629
Non
-
Residential Property
Rooms/Sq. Ft.

EDUs
per 1,000
Sq. Ft./Room
Total
Future
EDUs
Future Retail/Commercial
6,112,400
sq. ft.

0. 2
39 1,
459
Future Office
1,308,150
sq. ft.

0. 335
438
Future Industrial
15,223,720
sq. ft.

0. 2
222
3,
380
Future Hotel/Motel Property
20,576
rooms

0. 0
48 982
Total
Future EDUs
N
/
A
N
/
A
4 7
,
889

Please refer to Table IV
-
1 4
for the total
residents and
employee estimates applicable
to Library facilities.

Table
IV
-
1 4
: Estimated
Total
Development
(2045)
Residential Property
Units
EDUs per unit
Total
EDUs
Total Residential Property
154,801
units

1.272
196,932
Non
-
Residential Property
Rooms/Sq. Ft.

EDUs per 1,000
Sq. Ft./Room
Total
EDUs
Total Retail/Commercial
33,808,000
sq. ft.

0. 2
39 8,
070
Total Office
5,470,575
sq. ft.

0. 3
35 1,8
33 Total Industrial
63,672,250
sq. ft.

0. 2
22 14,
138
Total Hotel/Motel Property
44,846
rooms

0. 0
48 2,1
41 Total
EDUs
N
/
A
N
/
A
22 3
,
113
21 SECTION
V

FEE CALCULATIONS

POLICE FEE

City of Anaheim
February
1 2
, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

www.FinanceDTA.com
V

FEE CALCULATIONS
The following sections present the reasonable relationship for benefit, impact, and rough proportionality tests for each fee element (i.e., police facilities, fire facilities, and
library
facilities) and the analysis undertaken to apportion costs for each type of public facility on the Needs List.

Future
f
acilities for parks shall be funded through the impact fee pursuant to the Quimby Act.

More detailed fee calculation worksheets for each type of facility are included in Appendix C.

A
Police Facilities
The Police Facilities will serve the residents and employees of Anaheim by providing public safety services. The Fee Study includes a component for new police facilities, equipment, and vehicles/aircraft. Table
V
-
A1
below illustrates how the police fee will meet the
requirements of AB
1600 with regard to
the
use of the fee, the type of development funded
or partially funded by the fee revenue, the reasonable relationship to the need for facilities ,
and the proportionality requirements.

Table
V
-
A1
:

Police Fee
–
AB 1600 Compliance
AB
1600 Code
Section
Description
Justification
66001(a)(1)
Identify the purpose of the
Fee
.

Provide a revenue source that will provide funds to
construct various police facilities and acquire
equipment and vehicles/aircraft
to
mitigate the
impacts of new residential and non
-
residential
development
on
the City’s Police facilities.
66001(a)(2)
Identify the use to which
the fee is to be put
.

Fees will be used to pay for the
e
xpansion/construction/acquisition of police
facilities, equipment, and vehicles.
66001(a)(3)
Demonstrate how there is
a reasonable relationship
between the fee’s use and
the type of development
project on which the fee is
imposed
.

New residential and non
-
residential development in
the City will generate additional residents and
employees who will generate service calls
,
increasing
the need for trained police personnel. Buildings,
equipment, and vehicles used to provide these
services will have to be expanded, constructed
,
or
purchased to meet this increased demand.
66001(a)(4)
Demonstrate how there is
a reasonable relationship
between the need for the
public facilities and type
of development project on
which the fee is imposed
.

The additional residents and employees from new
development
s
will impact demand for police facilities.

New police facilities are needed to mitigate the
impacts of the additional residents and employees. If
additional police facilities are not constructed and
equipment and vehicles are not acquired, then overall
p
ublic safety in the City will suffer.
22 SECTION
V

FEE CALCULATIONS

POLICE FEE

City of Anaheim
February
1 2
, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

www.FinanceDTA.com
AB
1600 Code
Section
Description
Justification
66001(b)
Demonstrate how there is
a reasonable relationship
between the amount of
the fee and the cost of the
public facility
.

The police fee is based on the cost
of providing new
facilities,
equipment, and vehicles.

A.1
Existing Facilities
The City of Anaheim provided a detailed breakdown of the existing police facilities.

The City currently has
six
police
station
facilities totaling
821,912
square feet
of
buildings
,
7 31
sets of radio and tactical response equipment, and 34
8 vehicles/aircraft. See
the table
below for a summary of the existing inventory.

Table
V
-
A2
:

Existing Police Facilities
Police Facility
Building Size (Sq. Ft.)
Anaheim Family Justice Center (150 W. Vermont Ave.)
17,777
Anaheim Police Main Station (425 S. Harbor Blvd.)
473,569
Anaheim Police East Station (8201 E. Santa Ana Canyon Rd.) 301,506
K9 Yard Police Facility (8155 E. Santa Ana Canyon Rd.)
24,593
Anaheim Police Garden Walk Station (321 Katella Ave.) [1] 2,200
Anaheim Police West Station (320 S. Beach Blvd.)
2,267
Total
821,912
Equipment
Equipment Sets
Pac
-
Set Portable Radios (Fully Equipped)
671
Tactical Response Group Special Equipment
60 Total
731
Vehicles/Aircraft Category
Number of
Vehicles/Aircraft
Marked Police Vehicle
s
16 3
Unmarked Police Vehicles
181
Police Department Aircraft
4 Total
348

[1]
The
City of Anaheim currently pays for office space in the Garden Walk facility. The designated space is used exclusively by the City of Anaheim.

23 SECTION
V

FEE CALCULATIONS

POLICE FEE

City of Anaheim
February
1 2
, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

www.FinanceDTA.com
A.2
Proposed Facilities and Costs
To
determine the proposed facilities, the City must determine the demand for
infrastructure created by new development. Residents and businesses benefit from law enforcement services in three ways: (i) directly, (ii) indirectly, and (iii) through standby availability. Direct services are those where a resident or business owner r
equires a direct response, usually as a result of being the victim of a crime. Direct service results in the form of a law enforcement officer contacting the victim.

Indirect bene
fits, such as crime prevention programs, proactive patrol time ,
and
other law enforcement services that serve all business
es
, citizens, and visitors, are
impossible to calculate for a specific boundary. An example of an
indirect benefit
would be the apprehension of a burglar in a particular neighborhood. Had the burglar not been apprehended and arrested, he/she may have broken into additional homes in the neighborhood. Most residents and businesses may go for many years before ever requiring a call
-
for
-
s
ervice. However, these fortunate residents and
businesses still benefit from law enforcement services, if in no other way than by the knowledge that a law enforcement officer is available through adequate planned standby to respond when needed.

The addition of new residential units and new business
es
will increase the demand
for
enforcement service level by creating more direct calls -
for
-
service, more areas
requiring preventative patrol, and
,
in general, will create more opportunities for
crimes to be committed. Demands will be made upon the previously listed assets in Table
V
-
A2
above in a direct, indirect, or standby form. Therefore, such assets would need to be expanded.

Table
V
-
A3
below identifies the facilities, equipment, and vehicles proposed to be funded in whole or in part with the collection of Police fees.

The q
uantity and costs
are based on estimates provided by the City.

24 SECTION
V

FEE CALCULATIONS

POLICE FEE

City of Anaheim
February
1 2
, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

www.FinanceDTA.com
Table
V
-
A3
:

Police Facilities Needs List
Police Facility
Land
Acquisition
(Sq. Ft.)
Building Size
(Sq. Ft.)
Total
Costs
Expand Law Enforcement Facilities Space
64,000
45,000
$65,860,000
Equipment
Equipment Sets
Costs
Additional Assigned Officer Equipment
1 6
1 $
6 ,
0 37,500
Communication Infrastructure and Systems
1 6
1 $
2 ,
4 15,000
Information Technology Equipment
1 6
1 $
1,127
,000
Total
NA
$9,579,500
Vehicles
Vehicles/Aircraft
Costs
Additional Patrol/Detective/Specialty Vehicles
80 $
7 ,2
0 0,000

Grand Total
$
82 ,
63 9
,500
Less Offsetting Revenues (Existing Fee Balance)
($1,867,009)
Net Facilities Cost
$
80 ,
77 2
,
491
For purposes of complying with AB 602, the
N
eeds
L
ist shown
herein
is considered to be
the CIP
.

Furthermore, the facilities to be funded by future development is less than the City’s existing LOS.

Note that the police impact fee calculated herein for residential property is on a per -
unit
basis. This is due to the fact that service demand for police facilities correlates closely to the number of residents in a home. Furthermore, the City has determin ed that, on average,
there is no evidence that a larger home in the City corresponds to additional residents in the home. Therefore, a uniform per
-
unit fee best reflects the actual impact a new home will have on local police services
.

A.3
EDUs
For Police facilities, the development of
the
property into residential and non
-
residential uses generates residents and employees
,
resulting
in increased service
calls made to the Police Department.

The table
below summarizes the existing and future development and corresponding EDUs, as described in Section IV (Demographics) herein:

25 SECTION
V

FEE CALCULATIONS

POLICE FEE

City of Anaheim
February
1 2
, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

www.FinanceDTA.com
Table
V
-
A4
:

Total EDUs
Type of Development
Existing EDUs
(2024)
Future EDUs
(2024
-
2045)
Total EDUs
Residential
1 5
5,
303
41,629
196,932
Retail/Commercial
3 1
,6
12 6,977
38,589
Office
6 ,
668
2,096
8,764
Industrial
5 1
,
441
16,164
67,605
Hotel/Motel Property
5,
540
4,697
10,237
Total
250,564
71,562
322,127
Percentage of Total EDUs
77 .
78 %
22 .
22 %
100.00%
A.4
Allocation of Costs
The total cost of $
80 ,
77 2,491
, as shown in Table
V
-
A3
above, is for police facilities
needed to serve existing and new development
s
. Described below
are
more detail
s
regarding each of the facilities and the methodology used to allocate the costs (i.e., based on the share of total EDUs in 2045, credit for existing development, etc.).

Police Stations:

Based on the locations of existing and new development
s
, additional
police facilities will be needed at various locations. The City has determined that additional law enforcement
facilities space
,
as
identified
in Table V
-
A3
,
will be
required
to serve new development.

The City currently has
821,912
square feet of
existing police station buildings
.

Since the buildout standard of
493.53
(
45,000
building square feet divided by
91,180
future residents multiplied by 1,000) is less
than the existing standard of 2,416.25 (821,912 divided by 340,160 existing residents multiplied by 1,000), 100% of the costs will be allocated to new development.

Equipment:

The City has determined that new officer equipment sets, communication infrastructure and systems, and information technology items (i.e., PCs, headsets, cameras, etc.)
are needed to adequately
serve new development.

The
City currently has
731 sets
of
police equipment
. Since the buildout standard of

1.77 (
1 61
equipment sets
divided by
91,180
future residents multiplied by 1,000) is
less
than
the existing standard of

2.15 (
731
divided by 340,160 existing residents
multiplied by 1,000), 100% of th
e costs will be allocated to new development.

Vehicles/Aircraft:

The City has determined that new patrol/detective/specialty vehicles are needed to adequately serve new development.

T
he City currently has
348
existing vehicles/aircraft.

Since the buildout standard of

0.88 (
8 0
vehicles
divided
by
91,180
future residents multiplied by 1,000) is
less than
the existing standard of

1.02 (
348
divided by 340,160 existing residents multiplied by 1,000), 100% of the costs will be allocated to new development.

Total Facilities Costs:

The table below shows
the total facilities costs allocated to new
and existing development.
26 SECTION
V

FEE CALCULATIONS

POLICE FEE

City of Anaheim
February
1 2
, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

www.FinanceDTA.com
Table
V
-
A5
:

Total Costs
New Facility
Cost Allocated
to Existing
Development
Cost Allocated
to Future
Development
Total Costs
Building Sq. Ft.
$0
$
6 4
,
372
,
077
$64,372,077
Equipment
$0
$
9,
363
,
0 78
$9,363,078
Vehicles/Aircraft
$0
$
7 ,
037
,
336
$7,037,336
Total
$0
$80,772,491
$80,772,491
A.5
Fee Amount
The Fee per EDU was calculated by dividing the costs allocated to future development by the number of future EDUs.

T
he fee amount for each land use
is
below
.

Table
V
-
A6
:

Police
Fees
Land Use Type
Number of Future
Units
/ 1,000 Sq. Ft.
/ Rooms
Development Impact Fee
per Unit
/ 1,000 Sq. Ft.
/
Room
Cost Financed
by Fees
Residential Units
(other than ADUs)
41,629
$
1 ,
128
.
70 $
46 ,
986
,
696
Accessory Dwelling Units
As determined below
Retail/Commercial
6,112
$1,288.30
$7,874,575
Office
1,308
$1,808.13
$2,365,310
Industrial
15,224
$1,198.41
$18,244,319
Hotel/Motel
20,576
$257.66
$5,301,592
Total
N
/
A
N
/
A
$
80 ,
772
,
4 91
Cost Allocated to Existing Development
$
0 Total Cost of
Police
Facilities
$
80 ,
77 2,491
Based on the development projections
included
in Appendix A, the fee amount
presented in Table
V
-
A6
above
is
expected to finance
100
% of the facilities needed.

Pursuant to Government Code Section
66324
, ADUs are exempt from incurring
impact fees from local agencies, special districts, and water corporations if such unit is less than 750 square feet. If an ADU is 750 square feet or larger, impact fees shall be charged proportionately in relation to the s
quare footage of the ADU to the square
footage of the primary dwelling unit.

For instance, the proportionate share for an ADU of 800 square feet located on the same lot as a primary residence of 2,500 square feet is equal to 32.00%. The police impact fee for such ADU is equal to $
361.18
(32.00% multiplied by $
1,
128.70
indicated
above).

Please see the fee model included herein as Appendix C. 27 SECTION
V

FEE CALCULATIONS

FIRE FEE

City of Anaheim
February
1 2
, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

www.FinanceDTA.com
B
Fire Facilities
The Fire Facilities will serve the residents and employees of Anaheim by providing fire protection services. The Fee Study includes a component for new fire facilities, equipment, and vehicles. Table
V
-
B1
below illustrates how the fire fee will meet the requirements of AB1600 with regard to
the
use of the fee, the type of development funded or partially funded by the fee revenue, the reasonable relationship to the need for facilities ,
and the
proportionality requirements.

Table
V
-
B1
:

Fire Fee AB 1600 Compliance
AB
1600 Code
Section
Description
Justification
66001(a)(1)
Identify the purpose of
the Fee
.

Provide a revenue source that will provide funds to
construct various Fire facilities and acquire
equipment and vehicles that will mitigate the
impacts of new residential and non
-
residential
development
on
the City’s Fire facilities.
66001(a)(2)
Identify the use to
which the fee is to be
put
.

Fees will be used to pay for the
e
xpansion/construction/acquisition of Fire
facilities, equipment, and vehicles.
66001(a)(3)
Demonstrate how there
is a reasonable
relationship between
the fee’s use and the
type of development
project on which the
fee is imposed
.

New residential and non
-
residential development
in the City will generate additional residents and
employees who will in turn generate service calls
increasing the need for trained Fire personnel.

Buildings, equipment, and vehicles used to provide
these se
rvices will have to be expanded,
constructed
,
or purchased to meet this increased
demand.
66001(a)(4)
Demonstrate how there
is a reasonable
relationship between
the need for the public
facilities and the type of
development project on
which the fee is
imposed
.

The additional residents and employees from new
development will impact
the
demand for Fire
facilities. New Fire facilities are needed to mitigate the impacts of the additional residents and
employees. If additional Fire facilities are not
constructed and equipment and vehicles are not
acquired, then overall public safety in the
City will
suffer.
66001(b)
Demonstrate how there
is a reasonable
relationship between
the amount of the fee
and the cost of the
public facility
.

The Fire fee is based on the cost
of providing new
facilities,
equipment, and vehicles.
28 SECTION
V

FEE CALCULATIONS

FIRE FEE

City of Anaheim
February
1 2
, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

www.FinanceDTA.com
B.1
Existing Facilities
The City of Anaheim provided a detailed breakdown of the existing fire and rescue facilities. The City currently has
eleven
Fire
station
facilities totaling
102,336
building
square feet
,
452
equipment
sets
,
and
13 3
vehicles. See
the table
below for a summary
of the existing inventory
.

Table
V
-
B2
:

Existing Fire Facilities
Fire Facility
Building Size (Sq. Ft.)
Downtown Station 1 (500 E. Broadway)
19,754
Brookhurst Station 2 (2141 W. Crescent Ave.)
10,864
Resort Station 3 (1717 S. Clementine St.)
12,112
Orange Station 4 (2736 W. Orange Ave.)
4,697
Kraemer Station 5 (1154 N. Kraemer Blvd.)
9,547
Euclid Station 6 (1313 S. Euclid Ave.)
14,441
Stadium Station 7 (2222 E. Ball Rd.)
3,781
Riverside Station 8 (4555 E. Riverdale Ave.)
7,216
Anaheim Hills Station 9 (6300 E. Nohl Ranch Rd.)
6,
367
Weir Canyon Station 10 (8270 E. Monte Vista Rd.)
6,069
Twila Reid Station 11 (3100 W. Orange Ave.)
7,938
Total
102,336
Equipment
Equipment Sets
Traffic Signal Preemption Equipment
187
Vehicle Equipment
29 Turnout (Personnel) Equipment
236
Total
452
Fire Vehicles
Vehicles
Fire Truck/Engine/Battalion/Others/CCRU
116
Ambulance
17 Total
133
B.2
Proposed Facilities and Costs
To
determine the proposed facilities, the City must determine the demand for
infrastructure created by new development.

All
new development
s
in the City will
impact
its
current ability to respond to fire, rescue, and medical calls -
for
-
service The
effect is twofold. Initially, each new residence and business will create, on average, additional
residents and employees,
increasing the likelihood of simultaneous (and
thus competing) calls
-
for
-
service. Additionally, as development spreads further from existing
stations, the distances (and thus response times) will increase, taking the existing engine companies out
-
of
-
service for greater periods of time.
29 SECTION
V

FEE CALCULATIONS

FIRE FEE

City of Anaheim
February
1 2
, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

www.FinanceDTA.com
The capacity of any fire station is finite and will reach practical limits (through call frequency and total incident time). When that capacity is exceeded, the level of service afforded to existing development will be reduced. In other words, if develop
ment continues without an increase in the number of fire stations, the existing stations would be overwhelmed in terms of calls -
for
-
service
from residents
and employees
, increasing the possibility of a greater number of simultaneous calls -
for
-
service. Add
itional demands will be made upon the previously listed assets in Table
V
-
B2
above
, and therefore, such assets will
need to be expanded.

Table V
-
B3
below identifies the facilities proposed to be funded in whole or in part by the collection
of Fire fees.

The q
uantity and costs are based on estimates provided
by the City.

Table
V
-
B3
:

Needs List
Fire Facility/Buildings
Land
Acquisition
(Sq. Ft.)
Building Size
(Sq. Ft.)

Total Costs
New Fire Station 13 (Location TBD)
72,745
12 ,
00 0
$2
3 ,
965
,675
Expansion of Fire Station 7 (Anaheim Canyon)
0 1
,
5 00
$4,200,000
New
Fire Station 12 (1822 S. State College Blvd.)
0 12,427
$
17,576,853
Total
72,745
25,927
$45,742,528
Services Building
Land
Acquisition
(Sq. Ft.)
Building Size
(Sq. Ft.)

Total Costs
Services Building (4950 E. La Palma Ave.)
0 24,990
$3,200,000
Equipment
Sets
Total
Costs
Traffic Signal Preemption Equipment
50 $
500
,000
Turnouts
36 $
511
,
956
Engine and Truck Uplift
4 $
816
,
66 0
Total
90 $1,828,616
Vehicles
Vehicles
Total
Costs
Engine for Station 12
1 $1,650,000
Engine for Station 13
1 $1,650,000
Truck for Station 13
1 $2,100,000
Command Vehicle for Station 13
1 $75,000
Urban Search and Rescue Vehicle
1 $2,100,000
Hazmat Vehicle
1 $1,800,000
Fuels Crew
-
BME Sequoia Crew Buggy
2 $969,600
Fuels Crew
-
Utility Truck
1 $150,000
Fuels Crew
-
UTV with Trailer
1 $75,000
Polaris RZR Pro XP (REMS)
1 $75,000
30 SECTION
V

FEE CALCULATIONS

FIRE FEE

City of Anaheim
February
1 2
, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

www.FinanceDTA.com
Fuels Crew
-
ATV with Trailer
1 $45,000

12 $10,689,600
Ambulance
Ambulance
Total Costs
Ambulance for Station 4
1 $
313,782
Ambulance for Station 12
1 $
313,782
Ambulance for Station 13
1 $
313,782
Total
3 $941,346
Grand Total
$
62,402,090
Less Offsetting Revenues (Existing Fee Balance)
($8,026,793)
Net Facilities Cost
$
54,375,297

For purposes of complying with AB 602, the
N
eeds
L
ist shown
herein
is considered to be
the CIP
.

Furthermore, the facilities to be funded by future development is equal to or less than the City’s existing LOS.

Note that the
fire
impact fee calculated herein for residential property is on a per -
unit basis.

This is due to the fact that service demand for
fire
facilities correlates closely to the number
of residents in a home. Furthermore, the City has determined that, on average, there is no evidence that a larger home in the City corresponds to additional residents in the home.

Therefore, a uniform per
-
unit f
ee best reflects the actual impact a new home will have on local
fire
services
.

Fire Stations
The City has determined that new fire station
s
(Station
s 12 and
13)
and
an expansion
of existing Fire Station 7
are needed to adequately serve anticipated new
development. In addition, the City would need to acquire land for Station 13
,
as well
as
equipment and vehicles related to such new facilities.

Services Warehouse/Emergency Operations Center
The City has determined the need for a Services Warehouse and Emergency Operations Center (EOC). The warehouse facility will be used to house Anaheim Fire & Rescue equipment, safety gear, and medical supplies for distribution to all fire stations.

The City currently stores this equipment at multiple locations throughout the City
. As development continues to expand, there is an increasing need to centralize this equipment to ensure it is accessible to all stations.

The EOC will serve
as a hub for the City’s
Emergency Management and Preparedness programs,
emergency management, and disaster response, ensuring Anaheim’s ability to prepare, respond
to,
and recover from man
-
made or natural disasters. The Services
Warehouse/EOC facility will ensure that the City can meet the growing demand for services associated with future development. The
Services Warehouse
/EOC
will be
located at 4950 La Palma Ave.

Land acquisition costs will be covered by existing
31 SECTION
V

FEE CALCULATIONS

FIRE FEE

City of Anaheim
February
1 2
, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

www.FinanceDTA.com
development since the building is currently utilized by the City Police Department but will be acquired and redeveloped by the Fire Department in the future.

Equipment
The types of equipment, as indicated in the table above, to be funded include (i) signals related to traffic preemption devices that change the lights at intersections to protect oncoming traffic and allow response vehicles to move more quickly through the
m,
(ii) turnout equipment (i.e. helmets, coats, pants, boots, masks, etc.), and (iii) vehicle upfit equipment (i.e. radios, hoses, harnesses, ladders, tools, etc.) .

Vehicles
/Ambulance
The City has determined that
four
new vehicles
and three new ambulance
will be
needed to serve new development.

B.3
EDUs
For Fire facilities, the development of property into residential and non -
residential
uses generates residents and employees result
ing
in increased service calls made to
the Fire and Rescue Department.

Table
V
-
B4
below summarizes the existing and future development and corresponding EDUs, as described in Section IV (Demographics) herein:

Table
V
-
B4
:

B.4
Allocation of Costs
The total cost of $
54,375,297
, as shown in
Table
V
-
B3
above, is for Fire facilities
needed to serve both existing and new development. Described below are
more
detail
s
regarding each of the facilities and the methodology used to allocate the costs (i.e., based on the share of total EDUs in 2045, credit for existing development, etc.).

Fire Stations
and
Land Acquisition
A
llocated to New Development
:

Any new
development within the City would impact the ability of fire personnel to provide adequate service and would increase fire department response times. Currently, the 32 SECTION
V

FEE CALCULATIONS

FIRE FEE

City of Anaheim
February
1 2
, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

www.FinanceDTA.com
City uses a 4
-
minute travel response time to emergencies as one of the benchmarks for customer service. Additional stations
,
land
,
as well as equipment for such
facilities will be needed
to
maintain the City’s existing response time
.

It is expected
that the number of City
-
wide calls for service will increase in proportion
to
future
growth.

Since the buildout standard of
284.35
(
25,927
building square feet divided by
91,180
future residents multiplied by 1,000) is
less
than the existing standard of
300.85
(
102
,
336
divided by 340,160 existing residents multiplied by 1,000), 100% of the costs,
will be allocated to new development
.

Services Building / Emergency Operations Center
:

The City has determined that
a
Services Building/Emergency Operations Center as
identified
in Table V
-
B3
will be
needed to serve
existing and
new development
.

T
he costs
for such facility
will be
allocated to both existing and new development. Of the total cost, $3,200,000
in
development costs
will be allocated
to
new development
while existing development
will be responsible for land acquisition costs for such property .

The facility is an
existing 24,990 squa
re foot building currently operated by the City Police
Department. The building will be transferred to the Fire Department and developed as the Services/Emergency Operations Center to accommodate both existing and
future development.

Vehicle
Equipment:

The City currently has
29 existing
vehicle
equipment sets. The
City has determined that an additional
four
vehicle
equipment sets are needed to
adequately serve new development, bringing the total to 33 equipment sets.

Since the buildout standard of 0.04 (
four
equipment sets divided by 91,180 future
residents multiplied by 1,000) is less than the existing standard of 0.09 (29 equipment sets allocated to existing development divided by 340,160 existing residents multiplied by 1,000), 100% of the costs will be al
located to new development
.

Turnout
(Personnel)
Equipment:

The City currently has
236
existing
turnout
(personnel)
equipment sets. The City has determined that an
additiona
l
36 equipment sets
are needed to adequately serve new development, bringing the total to
2 72
equipment sets.

Since the
buildout
standard of 0.
39 (
36 equipment sets divided by
91 ,1
8 0
future
residents multiplied by 1,000) is
less than
the
existing
standard of 0.
69 (
236
equipment sets allocated to
existing
development divided by
340
,1
6 0
existing
residents multiplied by 1,000), 100% of the costs will be allocated to new development
.

Vehicles:

The City currently has
116
existing vehicles.

T
he
City has determined that an
additiona
l
12 vehicles
are needed to adequately serve new development, bringing the total to
1 2
8 vehicles.
33 SECTION
V

FEE CALCULATIONS

FIRE FEE

City of Anaheim
February
1 2
, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

www.FinanceDTA.com
Since the buildout standard of 0.
13 (
12 vehicles divided by 91,180 future residents
multiplied by 1,000) is less than the existing standard of 0.34 (116 vehicles allocated to existing development divided by 340,160 existing residents multiplied by 1,000), 100% of the costs will be allocated to
new development
.

Ambulance:

The City currently has
17 existing
ambulance
vehicles.

The City has
determined that an
additiona
l three ambulance vehicles
are needed to adequately
serve new development, bringing the total to
20 ambulance vehicles.

Since the buildout standard of 0.03 (three ambulance vehicles divided by 91,180 future residents multiplied by 1,000) is less than the existing standard of 0.05 (17 ambulance vehicles allocated to existing development divided by 340,160 existing residents
multiplied by 1,000), 100% of the costs
will be allocated to new
development
.

Total Facilities Costs:

T
he table
below
shows
the total facilities costs allocated to new
and existing development.

Table
V
-
B5
:

Allocation of Fire Equipment
New Facility
Cost Allocated to
Existing Development
Cost Allocated to
Future Development
Total Costs
Stations
& Land Acquisition
$
0 $37,715,735
$37,715,735
Services Building / EOC
$
0 $3,200,000
$3,200,000
Traffic Signal Preemption
Equipment
$
0 $500,000
$500,000
Vehicle Equipment
$
0 $816,660
$816,660
Turnout Equipment
$
0 $511,956
$511,956
Engines/Trucks
$
0 $
10,689,600
$10,689,600
Ambulance
$
0 $941,346
$941,346
Total
$0
$54,375,297
$54,375,297
B.5
Fee Amount
The Fee per EDU was calculated by dividing the costs allocated to future development by the number of future EDUs. See
the table
below for the fee amount
for each land use.

34 SECTION
V

FEE CALCULATIONS

FIRE FEE

City of Anaheim
February
1 2
, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

www.FinanceDTA.com
Table
V
-
B
6 :

Fire
Fees
Land Use Type
Number of Future
Units
/
1,000 Sq. Ft.
/ Rooms
Development Impact
Fee per Unit
/
1,000 Sq.

Ft.
/ Rooms
Cost Financed
by Fees
Residential Units
(other than ADUs)
41,629
$
759.83
$
31,631,011
Accessory Dwelling Units
As determined below
Retail/Commercial
6,112
$867.27
$5,301,091
Office
1,308
$1,217.22
$1,592,305
Industrial
15,224
$806.76
$12,281,907
Hotel/Motel
20,576
$173.45
$3,568,983
Total
N
/
A
N
/
A
$
54,375,297
Cost Allocated to Existing Development
$
0 Total Cost of
Fire
Facilities
$54,375,297
Based on the development projections
included
in Appendix A, the fee amount
presented in
the table
above
is
expected to finance
100
% of the facilities needed.

For instance, the proportionate share for an ADU of 800 square feet located on the same lot as a primary residence of 2,500 square feet is equal to 32.00%. The fire impact fee for such ADU is equal to $
2 43
.
15 (32.00% multiplied by $
759
.
83 indicated
above).

Please see the fee model included herein as Appendix C.

35 SECTION
V

FEE CALCULATIONS

LIBRARY FEE

City of Anaheim
February
1 2
, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

www.FinanceDTA.com
C
Library Facilities
The Library Facilities will serve the residents
and employees
of Anaheim by promoting
literacy and learning, as well as providing an improved quality of life and a community gathering place. The Fee Study includes a component for new library facilities, a new bookmobile, and the acquisition of new library collection items. Table
V
-
C1
below
illustrates how the library fee will meet the requirements of AB1600 with regard to use of fees, the type of development on which the fee is imposed, the reasonable rel ationship to
the need for facilities and proportionality requirements.

Table
V
-
C1
:

Library Fee AB 1600 Compliance
AB
1600 Code
Section
Description
Justification
66001(a)(1)
Identify the purpose of
the Fee
Provide a revenue source that will provide funds
to construct various library projects that will
mitigate the impacts of new development
on
the
City’s Library facilities.
66001(a)(2)
Identify the use to which
the fee is to be put
Fees will be used to pay for the e
xpansion of
library facilities, bookmobile, and collection items.

Collection items include, but are not limited to,
books, periodicals, newspapers, DVDs, e
-
books,
online educational resources, etc.
66001(a)(3)
Demonstrate how there is
a reasonable relationship
between the fee’s use and
the type of development
project on which the fee
is imposed
New development in the City will generate
additional residents
and employees
who will
become library patrons
, demanding
increased
library facilities and a bookmobile. Collections will
have to be expanded
,
and additional volumes
(i.e.,
books, magazines, DVDs, etc.)
will be
acquired to
meet this increased demand. Fees collected from
new residential
and non
-
residential
development
will be used for the expansion of library facilities,
bookmobile, and acquisition of collection items.
66001(a)(4)
Demonstrate how there is
a reasonable relationship
between the need for the
public facilities and the
type of development
project on which the fee
is imposed
The additional residents
and employees
from new
development will impact
the
demand for library
facilities. New library facilities are needed to
mitigate the impacts of the additional residents
and employees
. If additional library facilities are
not constructed, the City’s libraries will become
overcrowded and have insufficient materials.
36 SECTION
V

FEE CALCULATIONS

LIBRARY FEE

City of Anaheim
February
1 2
, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

www.FinanceDTA.com
AB
1600 Code
Section
Description
Justification
66001(b)
Demonstrate how there is
a reasonable relationship
between the amount of
the fee and the cost of the
public facility
The library fee is based on the cost
of providing
new facilities and materials at the same levels as
those
provided to existing residents
and
employees
.

C.1
Ex
isting Facilities
The City of Anaheim currently has nine public library facilities totaling 154,520
building square feet, a bookmobile,
a mobile STEAM van,
and
566,450
collection
items. Collection items include, but are not limited to, books, periodicals, newspapers, DVDs, e
-
books, etc. See
the table
below for a summary of the existing
inventory.

Table
V
-
C2
:

Existing Library Facilities
Library Facilities
Building Size
(Sq. Ft.)
Collection
Items
Vehicles
Central Library
67,500
217,945
0 Haskett Library
23,673
63,165
0 Euclid Library
10,672
49,786
0 Sunkist Library
10,622
45,545
0 Canyon Library
18,000
78,492
0 East Anaheim Branch
10,546
42,118
0 Ponderosa Library
3,500
20,700
0 Heritage Services (Archival Research Outlet)
4,160
10,423
0 Founders Park (Historic Experience Center)
5,847
0 0
Bookmobile
0 22,320
1 STEAM Adventures: Exploration on Wheels Van
0 1,893
1 Books
-
on
-
the
-
go at ARTIC
0 170
0 Virtual Branch Services (obtain e
-
books through Library website)
0 13,893
0 Total
154,520
566,450
2 C.2
Proposed Facilities and Costs
To
determine the proposed facilities, the City must determine the demand for
infrastructure
created by new development.

All
new development
s
in the City will
impact
its
current ability to
provide sufficient library facilities and collection items at the City’s existing standard
. Additional demands will be made upon the previously
listed assets in Table
V
-
C2
above
,
therefore, such assets
will
need to be expanded
37 SECTION
V

FEE CALCULATIONS

LIBRARY FEE

City of Anaheim
February
1 2
, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

www.FinanceDTA.com
The table
below identifies the facilities proposed to be funded in whole or in part by
collecting
Library
fees.

Table
V
-
C3
:

Needs List
Library Facility/Buildings
Land
Acquisition
(Sq. Ft.)
Building Size (Sq.

Ft.)
Total Costs
New
Library
1 (One
-
Story Building) Location TBD
80,000
15,000
$
26,450,000
New
Library
2 (One
-
Story Building)
Location TBD
80,000
15,000
$
26 ,450,000
District 5 Expansion (Sunkist Branch)
0 13,903
$1
1 ,
2 61,430
Total
160,000
43,903
$64,161,430
Vehicles
Vehicles
Costs
Bookmobile
1 $
775
,000
Collection Items
Collection Items
Collection Items
149,000
$14,900,000

Grand Total
$79,
8 36,430
Less Offsetting Revenues (Existing Fee Balance)
($215,742)
Net Facilities Cost
$79,
6 20
,
688
For purposes of complying with AB 602, the
N
eeds
L
ist shown
herein
is considered
to be the CIP
.

Furthermore, the facilities to be funded by future development is equal to or less than the City’s existing LOS.

Note that the
library
impact fee calculated herein for residential property is on a per -
unit basis. This is due to the fact that service demand for library
facilities correlates
closely to the number of residents in a home. Furthermore, the City has determined that, on average, there is no evidence that a larger home in the City corresponds to additional residents in the home. Therefore, a uniform per -
unit f
ee best reflects the
actual impact a new home will have on local
library
services
.

The costs of the new library facilities, collection items, and bookmobile were
calculated by multiplying the proposed facilities by the unit cost estimates provided by the City
,
as shown in
the table
below.

Table
V
-
C4
:

Facilities Cost Provided by the City
Item
Cost
Cost per Land Sq. Ft. Acquisition
$115.00 per sq. ft.

Cost per Building Sq. Ft.
$1,150.00 per sq. ft.

Cost per Collection Item
$100.00 per item
Cost
of
New Bookmobile
$775,000 per Bookmobile

38 SECTION
V

FEE CALCULATIONS

LIBRARY FEE

City of Anaheim
February
1 2
, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

www.FinanceDTA.com
Based on the expected development through 2045, the City will build approximately 43,903
square feet
of buildings
and acquire approximately
14 9
,000
collection items
to serve new
and existing
development. While the location of all future libraries has not been identified, the City anticipates
that
two
new
15 ,000 square
-
foot library
facilities
,
as well as
an expansion of
the existing District
5 library facility (Sunkist
Branch)
,
will be needed
to serve new
and existing
development. In addition, a new
bookmo
bile will be acquired prior to 2045.

C.3
EDUs
For library facilities, the development of property into residential uses generates residents who increase the demand on the finite amount of library space and collection items.

The table
below summarizes the existing and future development and corresponding EDUs, as described in Section IV (Demographics) herein:

Table
V
-
C5
:

Total EDUs
Type of Development
Existing EDUs
(2024)
Future EDUs
(2024
-
2045)
Total EDUs
Residential
155,303
41,629
196,932
Retail/Commercial
6,611
1,459
8,070
Office
1,394
438
1,832
Industrial
10,757
3,380
14,137
Hotel/Motel Property
1,159
982
2,141
Total
175,224
47,888
223,112
Percentage of Total EDUs
78 .
54 %
21 .
46 %
100.00%
C.4
Allocation of Costs
The total cost of $
79,
6 20,688
, as shown in
Table
V
-
C3
above, is for
Library
facilities
needed to serve both existing and new development. Described below are
more
detail
s
regarding each of the facilities and the methodology used to allocate the costs (i.e., based on the share of total EDUs in 2045, credit for existing development, etc.).

Building Square Feet:

The City has determined that 43,903 building square feet will be needed to serve new and existing development through 2045.

Since the buildout
standard of
467.09
(
42,589
building square feet divided by
91,180
future residents
multiplied by 1,000) is greater than the existing standard of 454.
26 (
154,520
divided
by 340,160 existing residents multiplied by 1,000), the future costs are
limited to the
existing standard of
454.26
.

Therefore, after providing a credit to existing development for the existing 154,520
building square feet and a reduction to maintain the existing standard ,
3 % of the
39 SECTION
V

FEE CALCULATIONS

LIBRARY FEE

City of Anaheim
February
1 2
, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

www.FinanceDTA.com
costs will be allocated to existing development and
97 % will be allocated to new
development as shown
in the table
below.

Table
V
-
C6
:

Allocation of Library Facilities
Type of
Development
EDUs
Percentage
of Total
EDUs
Total Square
Footage in
2045
Credit for
Existing
Development
Reduction
to
Maintain
Existing
Standard
Allocated
Square
Footage
Percentage
of Costs
Allocated
Costs
Allocated
Existing
Development
175,224

78.54 %
155,834
(
154,520
)
0 1,314

3.07 %
$1,966,953
Future
Development
47,889

21.46 %
42,589
0 (1,170)
41,419

96.93 %
$
62,019,000
Total
223,113
1 00.00%
198,423
(
154,520
)
(1,170)
42,733
1 00.00%
$63,985,953

Collection Items:

The City has determined that
an additional
149,000 collection
items
will be needed to serve new
development
through 2045.

This results in an
average of 1.66 collection items per capita in 2045 (715,450 items divided by 431,340 residents at buildout). For comparison, the International Federation of Library
Associations and Institutions
(“IFLA”) suggests that book collections should be
between 1.5 to 2.5 books per capita.

Since the buildout standard of 1,634.13 (149,000 items divided by 91,180 future residents multiplied by 1,000) is less than the existing standard of 1,665.25 (566,450 divided by 340,160 existing residents multiplied by 1,000), 100% of the costs, or $14,859
,736 will be allocated to new development.

Bookmobile: The City has determined that one new bookmobile is needed to adequately serve existing and new development, bringing the total to three
bookmobiles.

Since the buildout standard of 0.00
47 (one bookmobile divided by
91,180
future residents multiplied by 1,000) is greater than the existing standard of

0.00 2
9 (two
vehicles
divided by 340,160 existing residents multiplied by 1,000), the future costs
are
limited to the existing standard of 0.00
2 9.

Therefore, after
crediting existing development for the
one
existing vehicle and
reducing the cost to maintain the existing standard,
68 % of the costs will be allocated
to existing development, and
32 % will be allocated to new development,
as shown
in the table
below.

40 SECTION
V

FEE CALCULATIONS

LIBRARY FEE

City of Anaheim
February
1 2
, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

www.FinanceDTA.com
Table
V
-
C
7 :

Allocation of Bookmobiles
Type of
Development
EDUs
Percentage
of Total
EDUs
Total
Bookmobiles
in 2045
Credit for
Existing
Development
Reduction
to Maintain
Existing
Standard
Allocated
Bookmobiles
Percentage
of Costs
Allocated
Costs
Allocated
Existing
Development
175,224
78 .
54 %

1.57 (
1 .00
)
0 0.
57 68
.
35 %
$
529,712
Future
Development
4 7,889
21 .
46 %

0. 43
0 .00
(0.1
7 )

0. 26
31 .
65 %
$
245,288
Total
223,113
1 00.00%
2 .00
(
1 .00
)
(0.17)

0.83 1

00.00%
$775,000

Total Facilities Costs: See
the table
below for the total facilities costs allocated to new
and existing development.

Table
V
-
C
8 :

Proposed Total Facilities Cost
New Facility
Cost Allocated to
Existing Development
Cost Allocated to
Future Development
Total Costs
Buildings
and Land Acquisition
$1,966,953
$62,019,000
$63,985,953
Collection Items
$
0 $14,
8 59,736
$14,859,736
Bookmobiles
$
529,712
$
245,288
$775,000
Total
$2,496,665
$77,124,024
$79,620,689
C.5
Fee Amount
The Fee per unit was calculated by dividing the costs allocated to future development by the number of future units. See
the table
below for the fee amount
for each land use.

Table
V
-
C
9 :

Library
Fees
Land Use Type
Number of
Future Units
Development
Impact Fee
Cost
F
inanced
by Fees
Residential Units
41,629
$
1,
610.48
$
6 7
,
042
,
630
Accessory Dwelling Units
As determined below
Retail/Commercial
6 ,1
12 $3
8 4
.
46 $2,
34 9
,
948
Office
1,
308
$5
3 9
.
59 $
70 5
,
867
Industrial
1 5
,
224
$3
5 7
.
60 $
5 ,
4 43
,
997
Hotel/Motel
20,576
$
76 .
87 $1,
5 81
,
583
Total
N
/
A
N
/
A
$
7 7
,
124
,
024
Cost Allocated to Existing Development
$
2 ,
496
,
664
Total Cost of
Library
Facilities
$79,
6 20,688
Based on the development projections
included
in Appendix A, the fee amount
presented in Table
V
-
C
9 above
is
expected to finance approximately
9 7
% of the
41 SECTION
V

FEE CALCULATIONS

LIBRARY FEE

City of Anaheim
February
1 2
, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

www.FinanceDTA.com
facilities needed. The City will need to fund the remaining costs from other sources of funds.

For instance, the proportionate share for an ADU of 800 square feet located on the same lot as a primary residence of 2,500 square feet is equal to 32.00%. The library
impact fee for such ADU is equal to $
5 1
5 .
35 (32.00% multiplied by $1,
6 10
.
48 indicated
above).

Please see the fee model included herein as Appendix C. 42 SECTION
V

FEE CALCULATIONS

PARKS FEE

City of Anaheim
February
1 2
, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

www.FinanceDTA.com
D
Park Facilities
Public parks play an important part in the overall quality of life for residents in the City of Anaheim. The Fee Study includes a component for new public parks and improvements to existing parks pursuant to the requirements of California Government Code Section 66477,
commonly known as the “Quimby Act
,
” as
mentioned earlier
in Section II (Legal
Requirements).

The City’s Community Services Department determines the new facilities to be acquired or improved as needed to serve new
residential
development.

D.1
Existing and Future Development
Pursuant to the Quimby Act, the parks service population per household must be calculated utilizing the most recent federal census data. Therefore, Table V
-
D1
below provides estimates of the City’s current population and units based on the 20 23
US Census Data.

Table
V
-
D1
:

Parks Service Population and Units
by Land Use from 2023 US Census Data
Population Category
Single
Family
Detached
/Attached
Property
Two to
Four Plex
Multi
-
Family
Property
Five Plex
or
more
Multi
-
Family
Property
Mobile
Homes
Total
Existing Residents in City
180,424
43,241
99,206
10,823
333,694
Existing Residential Units in City
53,876
12,156
40,477
3,250
109,759
Existing Population per Household

3.3489

3.5572

2.4509

3.3302

3.0402
D.2
Fee Calculation
The Quimby Act defines the formula for
the
calculation of the impact fee as follows:

Fee =
Cost per Acre
x
City Park
Standard
(Acreage
per 1,000
Residents)
x
Population per
Household
divided
by 1,000

Cost per Acre:

The total cost per acre is based on the cost of land per acre combined with the development cost per acre, as shown in
the table
below.

43 SECTION
V

FEE CALCULATIONS

PARKS FEE

City of Anaheim
February
1 2
, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

www.FinanceDTA.com
Table
V
-
D2
:

Cost per Acre
Category
Cost
Cost of Land per Acre
$
5,000,000
Development Cost per Acre
$
1,
834,740
Total Costs per Acre
$6,834,740
I
n May 20
24 , the City retained real estate appraisers Keyser Marston Associates to conduct a land appraisal study. The study provided the City with a baseline land value for the land type normally acquired for City of Anaheim parks. The land appraisal study found tha
t the baseline market value for the land type normally
acquired for City of Anaheim neighborhood parks as of May 1 3 , 20
24,
was
approximately $
115
per square foot, or $
5 ,
000
,
00 0 per acre. A copy of this report is
included herein as Appendix B
.

The development cost of $
1,834,740
per acre
, as provided by the City,
is based on
actual development costs from recent park projects in the City. This figure is based on recent actual
development costs
per acre for
Little Pine Park, Center Greens, Ross
Park
Playground, Citrus Park Playground,
and
Maxwell Park
-
Dog Park and
estimated
costs for the
Boysen Park renovation
located in the City. The City has determined
that this cost per acre is appropriate
for future cost estimates based on what they
anticipate
build
ing
from the park fees.

City Park Standard:

Pursuant to the Quimby Act, the maximum amount of park area calculated for the fee cannot exceed three acres of park area per 1,000 residents.

However, if the amount of existing park area exceeds that limit, then the City may adopt a higher standard not t
o exceed five acres per 1,000 residents. The City has
determined that 2.0 acres per 1,000 residents is the appropriate park standard for new development.

Population per Household
:

The population per household per unit
by residential type
is
shown in Table
V
-
D1
above.

F
ee
Amount
:

Based on the information above, the
updated
fee is
shown in
table
V
-
D3
below
.

Please see the fee model included herein as Appendix C for more detail.

44 SECTION
V

FEE CALCULATIONS

PARKS FEE

City of Anaheim
February
1 2
, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

www.FinanceDTA.com
Table
V
-
D3
:

Fee per Dwelling Unit
Residential Land Use
from
2023 US Census Data
Impact Fee per
Dwelling Unit
(other than ADUs)
SFD and SFA
$
45,777
.38
2 -
4 Plex MFA
$
48,62

4.71 5 Plex or greater MFA
$
33,50

2.84 Mobile Homes
$
45,52

1.47 Pursuant to Government Code Section 66324, ADUs are exempt from incurring impact fees from local agencies, special districts, and water corporations if such unit is less than 750 square feet. If an ADU is 750 square feet or larger, impact fees shall be charged proportionately in relation to the square footage of the ADU to the square footage of the primary dwelling unit.

For instance, the proportionate share for an ADU of 800 square feet located on the same lot as a primary SFD or SFA residence of 2,500 square feet is equal to 32.00%.

The parks impact fee for such ADU is equal to $14,64

8.76 (32.00% multiplied by
$45,777
.38
indicated above).

The Quimby Act also allows developers to dedicate land to the public agency in lieu of paying the Park Fee. The formula for determining the amount of land to dedicate pursuant to the Quimby Act is described below:

Minimum
Acreage
Dedication
=
Avg. Number
of persons per
unit
/ 1,000
x

City Park
Acreage
Standard
(2.0
acres per 1,000
residents)
For the City, this results in a minimum acreage dedication per dwelling unit
,
as
shown
in Table V
-
D4
below:

Table
V
-
D4
:

Minimum Acreage Dedication
per Dwelling Unit
Residential Land Use
from
2023 US Census Data
Minimum
Acreage
Dedication
per
Dwelling Unit
(other than ADUs)
SFD and SFA

0.00 670
2 -
4 Plex MFA

0.00 711
5 Plex or greater MFA

0.00 490
Mobile Homes

0.00 666
45 SECTION
V

FEE CALCULATIONS

PARKS FEE

City of Anaheim
February
1 2
, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

www.FinanceDTA.com
Certain developers may be required to dedicate additional land pursuant to their development agreement with the City.

46 SECTION
VI

IMPLEMENTATION OF FEES

City of Anaheim
February
1 2
, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

www.FinanceDTA.com
VI

IMPLEMENTATION OF FEES
In addition to the legal requirements covered in
S
ection
II
, a number of recommendations
for the adoption and administration of the
development impact fee
s
are
presented in this
report
.

All recommendations presented in this section
, unless otherwise noted,
are based
on the Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code §66000
et seq.
)
,
also referred
to
as the “Act,”
which provides specific requirements for
establishing and administering
development
impact fee
programs
. The Act
also mandates procedures for administer
ing impact fee
programs
,
such as
the
collection and accounting
of impact fees
, refunds,
mandatory
updates, and reporting requirements.

At the time the
City
imposes an impact fee, Government Code 66020 requires a written statement of the amount of the fee and a written notice of a 90 -
day period during which
the imposition of the fee can be protested
.

Prior to
the enactment of
Section
66020, a
developer could not challenge the validity of fees imposed on a residential development without refusing to pay them
.

Under these circumstances, developers were required to pay disputed fees before they could be challenged
.

Section
66020 was drafted
to correct that
problem.

The various subparts of
S
ection 66020 allow for a procedure that permits a developer to pay the fees under protest, obtain the relevant building permit, and then proceed with the project while pursuing an action to challenge the fees
.

If the action is successful, the fees
will be refunded with interest
.

However, failure to protest
the
imposition of the fee during
the allowed period may deprive the fee payer of the right to any subsequent legal challenges
.

Any challenges to be filed must be submitted within
90 days of enactment
.

The
subsequent sections provide specific guidelines
for
implementing
development impact
fee
s.

A
The Collection of
Development Impact Fee
s
According to
Government Code
Section 66007, any local agency that imposes any fees or charges on residential development for the construction of public improvements or facilities shall not require the payment of those fees or charges, notwithstanding any other provision of law, until
the date of the final inspection or the date the
Certificate of
Occupancy
is issued, whichever occurs first
.

However, utility service fees may be collected
when
an application for utility service is
received
.

If the residential development contains more than one dwelling, the local agency may determine whether the fees or charges shall be paid on a pro
-
rata
basis for each
dwelling when it receives its final inspection or
Certificate of Occupancy
, on a
pro
-
rata
basis
when a certain percentage of the
houses
have received their final inspection or
Certificate
of Occupancy,
or on a lump
sum basis when the first dwell
ing in the development receives
its final inspection or
Certificate of Occupancy
, whichever
of the three
occur first.

An exception allows
development impact fee
s
to be collected at an earlier time if they will
be used to reimburse the agency for expenditures previously made or for public
47 SECTION
VI

IMPLEMENTATION OF FEES

City of Anaheim
February
1 2
, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

www.FinanceDTA.com
improvements or facilities for which money has
already
been appropriated
.

If any fee or
charge specified is not fully paid prior to
the
issuance of a building permit for construction,
the local agency issuing the building permit may require the property owner or lessee ,
if
the lessee’s interest appears of record, as a condition of issuance of the building permit, to execute a contract to pay the fee or charge, or applicable portion.

Statutory restrictions in place for residential development at the time when
fees may be
collected do not apply to non
-
residential development. In cases where the fees are not collected upon the issuance of building permits, Sections 6607(c)(1) and (2) provide that the City may require the property owner of a non
-
residential deve
lopment to execute a contract
to pay the fee and subsequently record that contract as a lien against the property owner.

The amount of the impact fee for such ADU
is
described in
S
ection
I.B.2
above
B
The Assignment and Expenditure of Fee Revenue
According to
S
ection 66006, if a local agency requires the payment of a fee specified in connection with the approval of a development project, the local agency receiving the fee shall deposit it with the other fees for the improvement to be funded
in a separate capital
facilities account or fund in a manner to avoid any commingling of the fees with other revenues and funds of the local agency, except for temporary investments, and expend those fees solely for the purpose for which the fee was collec ted
.

Any interest in
come
earned in the capital facilities account or fund shall also be deposited in that account or fund and expended only for the purpose for which the fee was originally collected .

Common practice is to maintain separate funds or accounts for impact fee revenues by facility category
.

DTA recommends the
continuation of
that approach
.

C
Exemptions, Reductions
,
and Waivers.

If a project has characteristics that indicate its impact on a particular public facility or infrastructure system will be significantly and permanently smaller than the average impact used to calculate impact fees in this
Fee S
tudy, the fees should be reduced accordingly
.

The
City
may voluntarily waive or reduce the fees that would otherwise apply to a project to promote goals such as affordable housing or economic development .

However,
implementing
this policy may not result in increased costs for other development projects
and
is
allowed only if such
costs are
offset
by
other revenue sources.

D
Developer Improvement Credits
If the
City
maintain
s a
policy that requires a developer, as a condition of project approval, to construct facilities for which impact fees have been or will be charged , the impact fee
imposed on that development project for that type of facility must be adjusted to reflect a 48 SECTION
VI

IMPLEMENTATION OF FEES

City of Anaheim
February
1 2
, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

www.FinanceDTA.com
credit for such dedication or construction.

Furthermore, the impact fee imposed on that
development project for that type of facility must be adjusted to reflect a credit for the cost of the facilities or improvements constructed by the developer .

If circumstances allow a
developer to dedicate land, buildings, or other valuable considerations in lieu of paying fees, the
City
maintains the discretion to accept or reject such offers and may negotiate the terms under which an offer would be accepted.

E
Existing Development Credit
If a project involves
the
replacement, redevelopment
,
or intensification of previously
existing development, impact fees should be applied only to the portion of the project that
represents a net increase in demand for relevant facilities, applying the measure of demand used in this study to calculate that particular fee
.

Since residential service demand
is usually
estimated
based on
-
demand
per dwelling unit, an addition to a single
-
family dwelling unit
typically would not be subject to an impact fee if it
does not increase the number of dwelling
units in the structure
.

In any project that results in a net increase in the number of dwelling units, the added units would normally be subjected to impact fees .

A similar analysis can
be applied to non
-
residential development using a measure of demand on which impact fees are based
.

F
Annual Reporting and Accounting of Fees
AB 1600 requires that
general law and charter cities account for every fee
they collect under
its terms
.

Funds collected for each capital facility or service shall be deposited in separate accounts and not commingled with any other funds for other impact fees .

While funds are
accruing for individual capital facilities, the
City
must keep track of each fund and provide
an annual report
.

Section 66006 requires that for each separate account or fund established, the local agency shall
,
within 180 days after
the last day of each fiscal year,
make available to the public the following information for the fiscal year:

1. A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund ;

2. The amount of the fee
;

3. The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund ;

4. The amount of the fees collected and interest earned ;

5. An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended and the amount of the expenditures on each improvement, including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees ;

6. An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement, as identified in
Paragraph (2) of Subdivision (a) of Section 66001, and the public improvement remains incomplete
;
49 SECTION
VI

IMPLEMENTATION OF FEES

City of Anaheim
February
1 2
, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

www.FinanceDTA.com

7. A description of each
inter
-
fund
transfer or loan made from the account or fund,
including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended and, in the case of an
inter
-
fun
loan, the date on which the loan will be
repaid and the rate of interest that the account or fund will receive on the loan ; and

8. The amount of refunds made pursuant To Subdivision (e) of Section 66001 and any allocations pursuant to Subdivision (f) of Section 66001.

The
City
must review the information available at the next regularly scheduled public meeting not less than 15 days after this information is made available to the public .

Notice
of the time and place of the meeting, including the address where this information may be reviewed, shall be mailed
at least 15 days prior to the meeting to any interested party who files a written request with the local agency for mailed notice of the meeting.

In addition, pursuant to AB 516 which became effective January 1, 2024 and amended Govt
.

Code
Sections 66006 and 66023, additional reporting requirements include the following:

1. Identify any delays in construction and updated timing .

2. Fee payers have a right to request an audit of the fee to determine if fee charged exceeds the reasonable estimated cost of providing the facility .

3. Agency must provide a website link with fee account information .

4. If the agency does not have a plan to spend fees on authorized facilities, such fee amounts must be refunded. Agency must identify the amount of any refunds and names of individuals or entities to receive such refund.

G
Refunding Policy
Under the Mitigation Fee Act, Govt
.

Code §66000
et seq.
, each development fee must be
deposited in a separate capital facilities account and may be expended only for the purposes for which it was collected
.

For all unexpended fees, the agency must make findings every 5 years that:

1. Identify the purpose
for
which the fee will be put
;

2. Demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the unexpended balance and the purpose for which the fee was charged;

3. Ascertain
the sources and funding for any as
-
yet
-
incomplete
public improvements
and

4. Designate the approximate date the agency expects the funding for uncompleted improvements to be deposited in the account
[
§66001(d)(1)
].

The Act provides that
“if the findings are not made as required by [the Act], the local agency shall refund the
money
in the account” to the current owners of the properties for which the fees were paid
[
§66001(d)(2)
]
.

Failure to make
the
findings specified in
the
Mitigation Fee Act requires a refund of all
50 SECTION
VI

IMPLEMENTATION OF FEES

City of Anaheim
February
1 2
, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

www.FinanceDTA.com
unexpe
nd
ed
development impact fee
s.

When sufficient funds have been collected to
complete financing of the public improvements contained in the CIP, the public agency shall identify "an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will be commenced" within 180 days of
collecting
the required funds (Gov
.

Code §66001(e)
].

Failure to comply with this requirement also mandates
the
return of the collected funds, as
stated above.

Furthermore, pursuant to
Gov
.

Code §
66008.1, otherwise known as AB 516, any
fees for
improvements that are collected and not expended within a reasonable time of deposit of
such fees
shall be returned to the qualified applicant that originally deposited the fees .

H
Administration Costs of Fee Implementation
The cost of implementing the
development impact fee
s
is not included in the fees
themselves and must be determined by
the
City.

To recover the periodic costs of updating
the fees studies, implementing the program, ongoing staff costs, managing the updates ,
and
preparing annual and five
-
year updates required by the Act, an administration fee may be added to the impact fees calculated in this
Fee S
tudy
.

To recover administrative costs
incurred by the City in administering the Fee program, an administrative c omponent of 0.5%
of the total
fee is added to the fees calculated for each facility category.

I
Indexing of Impact Fee Rates
The
development impact fee
s
presented in this report are based on current facility costs provided by the
City
and should be adjusted annually to account for inflation .

The purpose
of the adjustment is to account for future escalation in costs for land , equipment, vehicles,
and construction
.

DTA recommends that after adoption, the fee should be reviewed each year and adjusted by
a reliable index such as ENR’s BCI
,
generally used as the primary basis
for indexing construction costs. Ordinarily, land costs make up a significant portion of the
costs covered by the fees and do not lend themselves to traditional cost indexes. As such, land costs should be adjusted to changes in local land prices.

J
Updating the Impact Fee Study
As stated in Section II, AB 602 was signed into law in September of 2021 by
the Governor of
California
, and it
provides new
S
tatewide requirements for local jurisdictions seeking to impose
development impact fee
s
on development projects
. Among these requirements are
that nexus studies shall be updated at least every 8 years as of January 1, 2023. However, DTA concurs with the generally accepted policy that
5 years is a
reasonable
rule
-
of
-
thumb
time period for impact fee updates
, particularly because the r
equired 5
-
year findings (see
above) can be approved at that same time.

In some instances, fees may remain valid for a
longer period of time if the
City
’s land use and facility plans do not change
. A
case in point
is a
municipality
at or near full build
-
out capacity
.

However, a dynamic
,
growing
municipality
facing significant
land
-
use changes would be
a disservice if it maintained the
current fee structure for too long without a
F
ee
S
tudy to update the current rates.

51 SECTION
V
I
I

FEE SUMMARY

City of Anaheim
February
1 2
, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

www.FinanceDTA.com
VII

FEE SUMMARY
Tabl
e
VII
-
1 below
summarize
s
the fees for the various land uses within the f
our
facility categories. These fees represent the maximum fee that can be charged to any land use.

To
recover administrative costs incurred by the City in
admi
n
istering t
he Fee
program, an administrative component of 0.5% of
the total
fee is added to the fees
calculated for each facility category.

Table
VII
-
1 :

Development Impact Fee
Summary
Land Use
Police
Fire
Library
Parks *
Administrative
Total
Residential (other than ADUs)
$1,
128.70
$
759.83
$1,610.48
$45,777.38
$24
6 .
38 $49,
522.77
per Unit
Accessory Dwelling Unit
As determined pursuant to Section I.B.2 below
Retail/Commercial
$1,
288
.
30 $867.27
$384.46
$0.00
$1
2 .
70 $2,
552.72
per KSF
Office
$
1 ,
80 8.1
3 $1,217.22
$539.59
$0.00
$1
7 .8
2 $3,
582.77
per KSF
Industrial
$1,
198
.
41 $806.76
$357.60
$0.00
$
11 .
81 $2,
374.59
per KSF
Hotel/Motel
$
257
.
66 $173.45
$76.87
$0.00
$2.
54 $5

10.52 per Room
*Parks fee shown is for a Single Family Detached or Single Family Attached unit. Please see Section V.D. herein for the fee for additional residential land uses.

A
t the time of permit issuance,
n
ew development
shall pay the appropriate fee for
each facility category
,
and the City shall deposit the funds in a separate account dedicated to the construction of the proposed
facilities
in accordance with
Government Code Section 66006(a).

For purposes of determining the impact fees due, any “second unit” or “accessory dwelling unit” (as determined pursuant to Section 65852.2 of the Government Code) shall be considered a separate residential unit and shall be subject to this fee.

In addition, pursuant to Government Code Section
66324
, ADUs are exempt from
incurring impact fees from local agencies, special districts, and water corporations if such unit is less than 750 square feet. If an ADU is 750 square feet or larger, impact fees shall be charged proportionately in relation to the s quare footage of the ADU to
the square footage of the primary dwelling unit. For instance, the proportionate share for an ADU of 800 square feet located on the same lot as a primary residence of 2,500 s
quare feet is equal to 32.00%. The impact fee for such ADU is equal to $
1 5
,
847
.
29 (32.00% multiplied by $
49 ,
522
.
77 indicated above).

Every five years
,
the City shall report the status of the funds in accordance with Government Code Section 66001(d) and shall i) identify the purpose to which the fee is put; ii) demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which it is charge,
iii) identify the sources and amounts of funding needed to complete the program, iv) list the facilit
ies not yet completed, and v) i
dentify, to the
52 SECTION
V
I
I

FEE SUMMARY

City of Anaheim
February
1 2
, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

www.FinanceDTA.com
extent possible, the timing of when the remaining funds are expected to be received.

It is further recommended that the City update its Capital Improvement Plan annually, by resolution of the City Council, in accordance with Government Code Section 66002.

Future development
may
result from intensification and/or redevelopment of
existing land uses. Each
such
redevelopment project will be evaluated in order to
calculate the applicable fees on the new proposed development ,
taking into account
the
development previously mitigated.

Finally, it is recommended that the City include in its Council Resolution to adopt the fees recommended in this Fee Study
a provision to automatically increase the fees
annually tied to an inflation index, such as the Engineering News -
Record
Construction Price Index, or some other reasonable measure of inflation.

APPENDIX
A
City of Anaheim
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

DEMOGRAPHICS

SUMMARY

10/3/2025

CITY OF ANAHEIM

DEMOGRAPHICS INFORMATION & EDU CALCULATION

EDU BACKUP
Number of Number of Residents per EDUs per
Residential Property Residents Residential Units Residential Unit Residential Unit Existing EDUs Residential Units 340,160 113,172 3.01 1.372 155,303
Number of Employees per EDUs per
Number of Non-Residential SF 1,000 Non-Res. SF 1,000 Non-Res. SF Non-Residential Property Employees / Rooms / Room / Room Existing EDUs Retail/Commercial 69,239 27,695,600 2.50 1.141 31,612
Office 14,605 4,162,425 3.51 1.602 6,668
Industrial 112,671 48,448,530 2.33 1.062 51,441
Subtotal 196,515 80,306,555 2.45 89,721
Hotel/Motel Rooms 12,135 24,270 0.50 0.228 5,540
Grand Total 250,564
Number of Number of Residents per EDUs per
Residential Property Residents Residential Units Residential Unit Residential Unit Future EDUs Residential Units 91,180 41,629 2.19 1.000 41,629
Number of Employees per EDUs per
Number of Non-Residential SF 1,000 Non-Res. SF 1,000 Non-Res. SF Non-Residential Property Employees [1] / Rooms / Room / Room Future EDUs Retail/Commercial 15,281 6,112,400 2.50 1.141 6,977
Office 4,590 1,308,150 3.51 1.602 2,096
Industrial 35,404 15,223,720 2.33 1.062 16,164
Subtotal 55,275 22,644,270 2.44 25,236
Hotel/Motel Rooms 10,288 20,576 0.50 0.228 4,697
Grand Total 71,562
Number of Number of Residents per EDUs per
Residential Property Residents Residential Units Residential Unit Residential Unit Total EDUs Residential Units 431,340 154,801 2.79 1.272 196,932
Number of Employees per EDUs per
Number of Non-Residential SF 1,000 Non-Res. SF 1,000 Non-Res. SF Non-Residential Property Employees / Rooms / Room / Room Total EDUs Retail/Commercial 84,520 33,808,000 2.50 1.141 38,588
Office 19,195 5,470,575 3.51 1.602 8,764
Industrial 148,075 63,672,250 2.33 1.062 67,605
Subtotal 251,790 102,950,825 2.45 114,957
Hotel/Motel Rooms 22,423 44,846 0.50 0.228 10,237
Grand Total 322,126
Total Development (2045)
Existing Development (As of 1/1/2024)
Future Development (2024 - 2045)
10/20/2025

CITY OF ANAHEIM

DEMOGRAPHICS INFORMATION & EDU CALCULATION
(FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY APPLICABLE TO LIBRARY FACILITIES ONLY) Number of Potential Percentage of Employee
Potential Library Number of Work Hours Per Weekend Days Library Hours Household Usage User of Facilities Hours per Work Day Days per Week Weekend Day Per Week Per Week Per Person Population Person Hours Percentage [1] Resident, non-working 6.9 5 3.6 2 41.7 42.23% 18 NA
Resident, working 1.0 5 3.6 2 12.2 57.77% 7 NA
Employee 1.0 5 0.0 0 5 NA 5 20.91%
City of Anaheim Existing Household Population 340,160
City of Anaheim Existing Labor Force 196,515
Employee Percentage of Household Population 57.77%

EDU BACKUP
Employment Adjusted
Number of Adjustment Number of Number of Residents per EDUs per Residential Property Residents Factor Residents Residential Units Residential Unit Residential Unit Existing EDUs Residential Units 340,160 NA 340,160 113,172 3.01 1.372 155,303 Employment Adjusted Number of Employees per EDUs per
Number of Adjustment Number of Non-Residential SF 1,000 Non-Res. SF 1,000 Non-Res. SF Non-Residential Property Employees Factor Employees / Rooms / Room / Room Existing EDUs Retail/Commercial 69,239 20.91% 14,480 27,695,600 0.52 0.239 6,611 Office 14,605 20.91% 3,054 4,162,425 0.73 0.335 1,394
Industrial 112,671 20.91% 23,562 48,448,530 0.49 0.222 10,757 Subtotal 196,515 41,096 80,306,555 0.51 18,763
Hotel/Motel Rooms 12,135 20.91% 2,538 24,270 0.10 0.048 1,159 Grand Total 175,224
Employment Adjusted
Number of Adjustment Number of Number of Residents per EDUs per Residential Property Residents Factor Residents Residential Units Residential Unit Residential Unit Future EDUs Residential Units 91,180 NA 91,180 41,629 2.19 1.000 41,629 Employment Adjusted Number of Employees per EDUs per
Number of Adjustment Number of Non-Residential SF 1,000 Non-Res. SF 1,000 Non-Res. SF Non-Residential Property Employees [1] Factor Employees / Rooms / Room / Room Future EDUs Retail/Commercial 15,281 20.91% 3,196 6,112,400 0.52 0.239 1,459 Office 4,590 20.91% 960 1,308,150 0.73 0.335 438
Industrial 35,404 20.91% 7,404 15,223,720 0.49 0.222 3,380 Subtotal 55,275 11,560 22,644,270 0.51 5,278
Hotel/Motel Rooms 10,288 20.91% 2,151 20,576 0.10 0.048 982 Grand Total 47,889
Employment Adjusted
Number of Adjustment Number of Number of Residents per EDUs per Residential Property Residents Factor Residents Residential Units Residential Unit Residential Unit Total EDUs Residential Units 431,340 NA 431,340 154,801 2.79 1.272 196,932 Employment Adjusted Number of Employees per EDUs per
Number of Adjustment Number of Non-Residential SF 1,000 Non-Res. SF 1,000 Non-Res. SF Non-Residential Property Employees Factor Employees / Rooms / Room / Room Total EDUs Retail/Commercial 84,520 20.91% 17,675 33,808,000 0.52 0.239 8,070 Office 19,195 20.91% 4,014 5,470,575 0.73 0.335 1,833
Industrial 148,075 20.91% 30,966 63,672,250 0.49 0.222 14,138 Subtotal 251,790 52,655 102,950,825 0.51 24,041
Hotel/Motel Rooms 22,423 20.91% 4,689 44,846 0.10 0.048 2,141 Grand Total 223,113
[1] Based on a weighted average of the estimated hours used each week by residents and employees. Reflects employment rate of 63.3% in the City based on US Census data as of 12/5/2024.

Existing Development (As of 1/1/2024)
Future Development (2024 - 2045)
Total Development (2045)
Total Hours of Potential Library Usage per Week

APPENDIX
B
City of Anaheim
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

REPORT REGARDING

FAIR MARKET LAND
VALUE

777 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET, SUITE 2555 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90017 PHONE 213.622.8095 2404005:ANA:kee
WWW.KEYSERMARSTON.COM 10023.001.067

ADVISORS IN:

Real Estate
Affordable Housing
Economic Development

BERKELEY
Debbie M. Kern
David Doezema

LOS ANGELES
Kathleen H. Head
Kevin E. Engstrom
Julie L. Romey
Tim R. Bretz

SAN DIEGO
Paul C. Marra
Linnie A. Gavino

EMERITUS
A. Jerry Keyser
Timothy C. Kelly

MEMORANDUM

Pursuant to your request, Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. (KMA) reviewed property sales information related to potential land acquisition costs for park, library and police facilities by the City of Anaheim (City). The City is interested in the property acquisition costs throughout the City. To provide an overview of the potential acquisition values, KMA compiled the following:

1. Vacant Land Sales – Vacant land sales were collected for parcels that are zoned for residential, commercial (e.g. retail and office) and industrial uses.

2. Improved Land Sales - Transactions for properties improved with commercial and industrial uses were also collected, as there are a limited number of unimproved parcels in the City available for acquisition.

KMA compiled City-wide vacant land, industrial building and commercial building sales.

The comparable sales are summarized in Tables 1 through 3. Consistent with the previous analysis (2016), KMA did not consider residential building sales in this analysis.

To: Ana Straabe, Principal Project Planner
City of Anaheim Community Services Department
From: Kevin Engstrom
Ryan Koyanagi
Date: May 13, 2024
Subject: Property Acquisition Costs for Parks, Library and Police Facilities 2404005:ANA:kee
10023.001.067
Ana Straabe, City of Anaheim May 13, 2024
Property Acquisition Costs Page 2

VACANT LAND SALES
The vacant land sales and transactions reported as sold for land value over the past two years are summarized in Table 1. The parcels ranged in size from 19,300 square feet (.44 acres) to 6.5 acres. Sale prices per square foot ranged from a low of $26 to a high of $126. Of the nine land sales surveyed, two were over $100 per square foot. The weighted average price over the full period was $59 per square foot. The commercial and industrial land sales were $60 and $62 per square foot, respectively. Residential land sales were $59 per square foot.

Given the limited number of comparable land sales available in the City, KMA also reviewed transactions in the market area over the same period (Table 1A).1 Providing additional context, the expanded search area includes 26 land sales with an average sales price of $74 per square foot.

IMPROVED PROPERTY SALES
Overall, there are a limited number of vacant sites in the City that can be acquired and assembled for park, library and police facility uses. It is more likely that the development of new facilities will require the acquisition of improved properties. Understanding this, KMA believes that the value of improved properties is also appropriate for estimating the cost of facility land.

Commercial building sales comparables are shown in Table 2 and industrial building sales comparables in Table 3.

The survey of commercial buildings identified 21 sales over the past year. The commercial building areas ranged from an approximately 1,300 square feet service station building to a 32,000 square foot 3-star auto dealership2The weighted average sales price of the commercial buildings is $100 per square foot of land, ranging from $29 to $350 per square foot of land.

The survey of industrial buildings identified 15 sales over the past year. The buildings range from 3,200 square feet to 121,225 square feet. The property values ranged from $68 to $200 square foot of land value and sold for a weighted average of $137 per square foot of land.

1 Land sales within five miles of Anaheim City Hall within the past two years. 2 Commercial buildings over 50,000 square feet of GLA were excluded from the survey. 2404005:ANA:kee
10023.001.067
Ana Straabe, City of Anaheim May 13, 2024
Property Acquisition Costs Page 3

SUMMARY
The City is predominantly built out, so there are few vacant parcels available for acquisition for parks, library or police facilities. As noted above, it is likely that the City will need to acquire improved properties rather than vacant parcels. Understanding this, it is most likely that industrial or commercial properties would need to be acquired.

For planning purposes, the price per square foot of land (rather than price per building square foot) is likely a better measure of acquisition costs. Given that the City will likely need to acquire multiple parcels to develop a park, library or police facility site, KMA believes that the City should target a typical land acquisition cost based on the weighted average values demonstrated by the commercial and industrial comparable sales shown in Tables 2 and 3 to allow for inefficiencies in the acquisition process, the likely need to acquire both industrial and commercial properties and continued value increases in the market area. For planning purposes, KMA suggests that the City use $115 per square foot of land ($5.0 million per acre), approximately 15% greater than the commercial weighted average, and approximately 15% less than the industrial weighted average.

This acquisition cost estimate does not include any allowance for relocation or goodwill payments that may be required for the purchase of improved properties. The City should check with its goodwill appraisers, its furnishings, fixtures and equipment appraisers, and its relocation appraisers to see what additional costs may be required. Until the City gets a response from its other appraisers, the City might plan for these costs to increase the acquisition costs by approximately $25 - $35 per square foot of land.

Total acquisition costs, for near-term planning purposes, may be $140 - $150 per square foot of land ($6.0 million - $6.5 million per acre) to account for complete property acquisition.

purposes, KMA suggeststhat the City use $115 per square foot of land($5.0 million per acre),

APPENDIX
C
City of Anaheim
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

FEE MODELS

Police
Fee Model

12/17/2025
City of Anaheim
Police Facilities
Fee Calculation
Table 1
Inventory of Existing Facilities
Facility Location Facility Unit Square Feet
Anaheim Family Justice Center 150 W. Vermont Ave. Bldg SF 17,777 Anaheim Police Main Station 425 S. Harbor Blvd. Bldg SF 473,569 Anaheim Police East Station 8201 E. Santa Ana Canyon Rd. Bldg SF 3 01,506 K9 Yard Police Facility 8155 E. Santa Ana Canyon Rd. Bldg SF 24,59 3 Anaheim Police Garden Walk Station 321 Katella Ave. [1] Bldg SF 2, 200 Anaheim Police West Station
320 S. Beach Blvd. Bldg SF 2,267
Total Existing Stations Bldg SF 821,912
Pac-Set Portable Radios (Fully Equiped) Equipment Sets 671 Tactical Response Group Special Equipment Equipment Sets 60 Total Equipment Equipment Sets 731
Marked Police Vehicle Vehicles 163
Unmarked Police Vehicles Vehicles 181
Police Department Aircraft Aircraft 4
Total Existing Vehicles/Aircraft Vehicles/Aircraft 348
[1] City of Anaheim currently pays for office space in the Garden Walk facility. The designated space is used exclusively by the City of Anaheim.

Table 2
Existing Standards
Standard per
Existing Units Existing Residents 1,000 Residents
Existing Police Station Building Square Feet 821,912 340,160 2416. 25 Exising Police Equipment 731 340,160 2.15
Exising Police Vehicles/Aircraft 348 340,160 1.02
Table 3
Proposed Facilities
Land Acquisition Building Facility
Facility Location Lot Size Units Cost Cost Cost
Expand Law Enforcement Facilities Space TBD 64,000 Lot SF 45,000 Bl dg SF $7,360,000 $58,500,000 $65,860,000 Additional Assigned Officer Equipment NA 161 Equipment Sets $6,037,500 Communication Infrastructure and Systems NA 161 Equipment Sets $2,415,000 Information Technology Equipment
NA 161 Equipment Sets $1,127,000
Total Equipment $9,579,500
Additional Patrol/Detective/Speciality Vehicles NA 80 Vehicles $7,200,000 Total Facilities Cost $82,639,500
Less Offsetting Revenues (Existing Fee Balance) ($1,867,009) Net Facilities Cost $80,772,491
12/17/2025
City of Anaheim
Police Facilities
Fee Calculation
Table 4
Allocation of Facilities to Existing and New Development Stations
Percentage of Total Station SF Reduction to Maintain Percentage of Type of Development EDUs Total EDUs in 2045 SF Credit Existing Standard Allocated SF Cost s Allocated Total Cost Existing Development 250,564 77.78% 674,322 (821,912) 0 0 0.00% $0 Future Development 71,562 22.22% 192,590 0 0 45,000 100.00% $64,372,077 Total 322,126 100.00% 866,912 (821,912) 0 45,000 100.00% $64,372,077 Equipment
Percentage of Total Equipment Reduction to Maintain Allocated Perce ntage of Type of Development EDUs Total EDUs in 2045 Equipment Credit Existing Standard Equipment Costs Allocated Total Cost Existing Development 250,564 77.78% 694 (731) 0 0 0.00% $0 Future Development 71,562 22.22% 198 0 0 161 100.00% $9,363,078 Total 322,126 100.00% 892 (731) 0 161 100.00% $9,363,078 Vehicles
Percentage of Total Vehicles/ Reduction to Maintain Allocated Perce ntage of Type of Development EDUs Total EDUs Aircraft in 2045 Vehicle Credit Existing Standard V ehicles Costs Allocated Total Cost Existing Development 250,564 77.78% 333 (348) 0 0 0.00% $0 Future Development 71,562 22.22% 95 0 0 80 100.00% $7,037,336 Total 322,126 100.00% 428 (348) 0 80 100.00% $7,037,336 Table 5
Future Standards
Future
Future Units Standard per Existing
Allocated to New Development Future Residents 1,000 Residents Stan dard Resulting Status Police Station Building Square Feet 45,000 91,180 493.53 2,416.25 Fu ture Standard Less than Existing Standard Police Equipment 161 91,180 1.77 2.15 Future Standard Less than Existing Standard Police Vehicles 80 91,180 0.88 1.02 Future Standard Less than Existing Standard Table 6
Proposed Facilities and Cost Per EDU
Number of Cost
Facility Cost Future EDUs Per EDU
Stations $64,372,077 71,562 $899.52
Equipment $9,363,078 71,562 $130.84
Vehicles/Aircraft $7,037,336 71,562 $98.34
Total $80,772,491 NA $1,128.70
Table 7
Development Impact Fee per Unit or 1,000 SF or Room
EDUs per EDUs per Units / Fees per Fees per 1,000 SF / Cost Financed Land Use Type Unit [2] 1,000 SF / Room [2] 1,000 SF / Rooms Unit Room by DIF Residential Unit 1.00 NA 41,629 $1,128.70 NA $46,986,696 Retail/Commercial NA 1.141 6,112 NA $1,288.30 $7,874,575 Office NA 1.602 1,308 NA $1,808.13 $2,365,310
Industrial NA 1.062 15,224 NA $1,198.41 $18,244,319
Hotel/Motel NA 0.228 20,576 NA $257.66 $5,301,592
Cost Allocated to Future Development $80,772,491
Cost Allocated to Existing Development $0
Total Cost of Police Facilities $80,772,491

Fire Fee
Model

City of Anaheim
Fire Facilities
Fee Calculation
Table 1
Inventory of Existing Facilities
Facility Location Facility Unit Square Feet
Stations
Downtown Station 1 500 E. Broadway Bldg SF 19,754
Brookhurst Station 2 2141 W. Crescent Ave. Bldg SF 10,864 Resort Station 3 1717 S. Clementine St. Bldg SF 12,112
Orange Station 4 [1] 2736 W. Orange Ave. Bldg SF 4,247
Kraemer Station 5 1154 N. Kraemer Blvd. Bldg SF 9,547
Euclid Station 6 1313 S. Euclid Ave. Bldg SF 14,441
Stadium Station 7 2222 E. Ball Rd. Bldg SF 3,781
Riverside Station 8 4555 E. Riverdale Ave Bldg SF 7,216 Anaheim Hills Station 9 6300 E. Nohl Ranch Rd. Bldg SF 6,367 Weir Canyon Station 10 8270 E. Monte Vista Rd. Bldg SF 6,069 Twila Reid Station 11 3100 W. Orange Ave. Bldg SF 7,938 Total Existing Fire Stations Bldg SF 102,336
Equipment
Traffic Signal Preemption Equipment Equipment Sets 187
Vehicle Equipment Equipment Sets 29
Turnout (personnel) Equipment Equipment Sets 236
Total Existing Equipment Sets Equipment Sets 452
Vehicles
Engines/Trucks/Command Vehicles/Other Vehicles 116
Ambulance Vehicles 17
Total Vehicles Vehicles 133

Table 2
Existing Standards
Standard per
Existing Units Existing Residents 1,000 Residents
Existing Fire Station Building Square Feet 102,336 340,160 300.85 Existing Traffic Signal Preemption Equipment 187 340,160 0.55 Existing Vehicle Equipment 29 340,160 0.09
Existing Turnout Equipment 236 340,160 0.69
Existing Engines/Trucks/Command Vehicles/Other 116 340,160 0.34 Existing Ambulance 17 340,160 0.05
Table 3
Proposed Facilities
Land Acquisition Building Total
Facility Location Lot Size Units Cost Cost Cost
New Fire Station 13 Approximately Lincoln Ave and 5 Fwy intersection 72,745 Lot SF 12,000 Bldg SF $8,365,675 $15,600,000 $23,965,675 Expansion of Fire Station 7 Anaheim Canyon NA Lot SF 1,500 Bldg SF $0 $4,200,000 $4,200,000 New Fire Station 12 1822 S. State College Blvd. NALot SF 12,427Bldg SF $0 $17,576,853 $17,576,853 Total Stations/Buildings 25,927 Bldg SF $8,365,675 $37,376,853 $45,742,528 New Services Building / EOC 4950 E. La Palma Ave. NA Lot SF 24,990 Bldg SF $0 $3,200,000 $3,200,000 Equipment: Traffic Signal Preemption Equipment 50 Equipment Sets $500,000 Equipment/Software: Engine and Truck Upfit 4 Equipment Sets $816,660 Equipment: Turnouts 36Equipment Sets $511,956
Total Equipment 90 Equipment Sets $1,828,616
Vehicles: Engine for Station 12 1 Vehicle $1,650,000
Vehicles: Engine for Station 13 1 Vehicle $1,650,000
Vehicles: Truck for Station 13 1 Vehicle $2,100,000
Vehicles: Command Vehicle for Station 13 1 Vehicle $75,000 Vehicles: Urban Search and Rescue Vehicle 1 Vehicle $2,100,000 Vehicles: Hazmat Vehicle 1 Vehicle $1,800,000
Vehicles: Fuels Crew - BME Sequoia Crew Buggy 2 Vehicles $969,600 Vehicles: Fuels Crew - Utility Truck 1 Vehicle $150,000 Vehicles: Fuels Crew - UTV with Trailer 1 Vehicle $75,000 Vehicles: Polaris RZR Pro XP (REMS) 1 Vehicle $75,000
Vehicles: Fuels Crew - ATV with Trailer 1 Vehicle $45,000 Total Engine/Truck/Command/Other Vehicles 12 Vehicles $10,689,600 Vehicles: Ambulance for Station 4 1 Ambulance $313,782
Vehicles: Ambulance for Station 12 1 Ambulance $313,782 Vehicles: Ambulance for Station 13 1 Ambulance $313,782 Total Ambulance 3 Ambulance $941,346
Total Facilities Cost $62,402,090
Less Offsetting Revenues (Existing Fee Balance) ($8,026,793) Net Facilities Cost $54,375,297
City of Anaheim
Fire Facilities
Fee Calculation
Table 4
Allocation of Facilities to Existing and New Development Stations & Land Acquisition
Percentage of Total Stations Reduction to Maintain Percentage of Type of Development EDUs Total EDUs in 2045 SF Credit Existing Standard Allocated SF Costs Allocated Total Cost Existing Development 250,564 77.78% 99,769 (102,336) 0 0 0.00% $0 [2] Future Development 71,562 22.22% 28,494 0 0 25,927 100.00% $37,715,735 [2] Total 322,126 100.00% 128,263 (102,336) 0 25,927 100.00% $37,715,735 Services Building / EOC
Percentage of Total EOC Bldg Reduction to Maintain Percentage of Type of Development EDUs Total EDUs in 2045 SF Credit Existing Standard Allocated SF Costs Allocated Total Cost Existing Development 250,564 77.78% 19,438 0 0 0 0.00% $0 Future Development 71,562 22.22% 5,552 0 0 24,990 100.00% $3,200,000 [3] Total 322,126 100.00% 24,990 0 0 24,990 100.00% $3,200,000 Equipment: Traffic Signal Preemption Equipment
Percentage of Total Equipment Reduction to Maintain Allocated Percentage of Type of Development EDUs Total EDUs in 2045 Equipment Credit Existing Standard Equipment Costs Allocated Total Cost Existing Development 250,564 77.78% 184 (187) 0 0 0.00% $0 Future Development 71,562 22.22% 53 0 0 50 100.00% $500,000 Total 322,126 100.00% 237 (187) 0 50 100.00% $500,000
Equipment: Vehicles Equipment
Percentage of Total Equipment Reduction to Maintain Allocated Percentage of Type of Development EDUs Total EDUs in 2045 Equipment Credit Existing Standard Equipment Costs Allocated Total Cost Existing Development 250,564 77.78% 26 (29) 0 0 0.00% $0 Future Development 71,562 22.22% 7 0 0 4 100.00% $816,660 Total 322,126 100.00% 33 (29) 0 4 100.00% $816,660
Equipment: Turnout Equipment
Percentage of Total Equipment Reduction to Maintain Allocated Percentage of Type of Development EDUs Total EDUs in 2045 Equipment Credit Existing Standard Equipment Costs Allocated Total Cost Existing Development 250,564 77.78% 212 (236) 0 0 0.00% $0 Future Development 71,562 22.22% 60 0 0 36 100.00% $511,956 Total 322,126 100.00% 272 (236) 0 36 100.00% $511,956
Vehicles: Engine/Trucks
Percentage of Total Vehicles Reduction to Maintain Allocated Percentage of Type of Development EDUs Total EDUs in 2045 Vehicles Credit Existing Standard Vehicles Costs Allocated Total Cost Existing Development 250,564 77.78% 100 (116) 0 0 0.00% $0 Future Development 71,562 22.22% 28 0 0 12 100.00% $10,689,600 Total 322,126 100.00% 128 (116) 0 12 100.00% $10,689,600 Vehicles: Ambulance
Percentage of Total Vehicles Reduction to Maintain Allocated Percentage of Type of Development EDUs Total EDUs in 2045 Vehicles Credit Existing Standard Vehicles Costs Allocated Total Cost Existing Development 250,564 77.78% 16 (17) 0 0 0.00% $0 Future Development 71,562 22.22% 4 0 0 3 100.00% $941,346 Total 322,126 100.00% 20 (17) 0 3 100.00% $941,346
City of Anaheim
Fire Facilities
Fee Calculation
Future Standards
Future
Future Units Standard per Existing
Allocated to New Development Future Residents 1,000 Residents Standard Resulting Status Fire Station Building Square Feet 25,927 91,180 284.35 300.85 Future Standard Less than Existing Standard Traffic Signal Preemption Equipment 50 91,180 0.55 0.55 Future Standard Equal to Existing Standard Vehicle Equipment 4 91,180 0.04 0.09 Future Standard Less than Existing Standard Turnout Equipment 36 91,180 0.39 0.69 Future Standard Less than Existing Standard Engines/Trucks 12 91,180 0.13 0.34 Future Standard Less than Existing Standard Ambulance 3 91,180 0.03 0.05 Future Standard Less than Existing Standard Table 5
Proposed Facilities and Cost Per EDU
Number of Cost
Facility Cost Future EDUs Per EDU
Stations $37,715,735 71,562 $527.03
Services Building / EOC $3,200,000 71,562 $44.72
Traffic Signal Preemption Equipment $500,000 71,562 $6.99 Vehicle Equipment $816,660 71,562 $11.41
Turnout Equipment $511,956 71,562 $7.15
Engines/Trucks $10,689,600 71,562 $149.37
Ambulance $941,346 71,562 $13.15
Total $54,375,297 NA $759.83
Table 6
Development Impact Fee per Unit or 1,000 SF or Room
EDUs per EDUs per Units / Fees per Fees per 1,000 SF / Cost Financed Land Use Type Unit [2] 1,000 SF / Room [2] 1,000 SF / Rooms Unit Room by DIF Residential Unit 1.00 NA 41,629 $759.83 NA $31,631,011
Retail/Commercial NA 1.141 6,112 NA $867.27 $5,301,091
Office NA 1.602 1,308 NA $1,217.22 $1,592,305
Industrial NA 1.062 15,224 NA $806.76 $12,281,907
Hotel/Motel NA 0.228 20,576 NA $173.45 $3,568,983
Cost Allocated to Future Development $54,375,297
Cost Allocated to Existing Development $0
Total Cost of Fire Facilities $54,375,297
[1] Expansion of building currently in progress. Existing building of 3,000 sq. ft. will be expanded by 1,200 sq. ft. to a total of 4,247 sq. ft. [2] Existing fund balance of $8 million on hand are fees included from the Platinum Triangle area and used to offset share of costs. [3] Development costs allocated to new development only. Existing development will be responsible for land acquisition costs.

Library
Fee Model

2/6/2026
City of Anaheim
Library Facilities
Fee Calculation
Facility Building Size (SF) Collection Items Vehicles
Central Library 67,500 217,945 0
Haskett Library 23,673 63,165 0
Euclid Library 10,672 49,786 0
Sunkist Library 10,622 45,545 0
Canyon Library 18,000 78,492 0
East Anaheim Branch 10,546 42,118 0
Ponderosa Library 3,500 20,700 0
Heritage Services (Archival Research Outlet) 4,160 10,423 0 Founders Park (Historic Experience Center) 5,847 0 0
Bookmobile Bus 0 22,320 1
STEAM Adventures: Exploration on Wheels Van 0 1,893 1
Books-on-the-go at ARTIC 0 170 0
Virtual Branch Services (obtain e-books through Library website) 0 13,893 0 Total 154,520 566,450 2
Table 2
Existing Standards
Standard per
Existing Units Existing Residents 1,000 Residents
Existing Library Building SF 154,520 340,160 454.26
Existing Library Collection Items 566,450 340,160 1665.25 Existing Bookmobile Bus 1 340,160 0.0029
Existing STEAM Van 1 340,160 0.0029
Facilities Needed
New Library Facility / Location Land Needed (SF) Building Size (SF) Land Cost Facility Cost Total Cost Future Libraries
New Library 1 (one-story building) Location TBD 80,000 15,000 $9,200,000 $17,250,000 $26,450,000 New Library 2 (one-story building) Location TBD 80,000 15,000 $9,200,000 $17,250,000 $26,450,000 Subtotal 160,000 30,000 $18,400,000 $34,500,000 $52,900,000 Expansion of Existing Libraries Additional SF
District 5 (Sunkist Branch) / 901 S. Sunkist St. 13,903 $0 $11,261,430 $11,261,430 One New Bookmobile Bus (Citywide) $0 $775,000 $775,000
Collection Items
Collection Items 149,000 $14,900,000
Land Cost Facility Cost Collection Item Costs
Total Facilities Cost $18,400,000 $46,536,430 $14,900,000 $79,836,430 Less Offsetting Revenues (Existing Fee Balance) ($49,722) ($125,755) ($40,264) ($215,742) Net Facilities Cost $18,350,278 $46,410,675 $14,859,736 $79,620,688 Proposed Facilities
Table 1
Inventory of Existing Facilities
Table 3
]
10/24/2025
City of Anaheim
Library Facilities
Fee Calculation
Allocation of Costs
Buildings and Land Acquisition
Percentage of Total Building SF Reduction to Maintain Percentage of Type of Development EDUs Total EDUs in 2045 SF Credit Existing Standard Allocated SF Costs Allocated Total Cost Existing Development 175,224 78.54% 155,834 (154,520) 0 1,314 3.07% $1,966,953 Future Development 47,889 21.46% 42,589 0 (1,170) 41,419 96.93% $62,019,000 Total 223,113 100.00% 198,423 (154,520) (1,170) 42,733 100.00% $63,985,952 Collection Items (does not include collection items for vehicles) Percentage of Total Items Collection Reduction to Maintain Percentage of Type of Development EDUs Total EDUs in 2045 Items Credit Existing Standard Allocated Units Costs Allocated Total Cost Existing Development 175,224 78.54% 561,886 (566,450) 0 0 0.00% $0 Future Development 47,889 21.46% 153,564 0 (4,564) 149,000 100.00% $14,859,736 Total 223,113 100.00% 715,450 (566,450) (4,564) 149,000 100.00% $14,859,736 Bookmobile Bus and corresponding collection items
Percentage of Total Bookmobiles Reduction to Maintain Allocated Percentage of Type of Development EDUs Total EDUs in 2045 Bookmobile Credit Existing Standard Bookmobiles Costs Allocated Total Cost Existing Development 175,224 78.54% 1.57 (1.00) 0.00 0.57 68.35% $529,712 Future Development 47,889 21.46% 0.43 0.00 (0.17) 0.26 31.65% $245,288 Total 223,113 100.00% 2.00 (1.00) (0.17) 0.84 100.00% $775,000 Future Standards 1.658668336
Future
Future Units Standard per Existing
Allocated to New Development Future Residents 1,000 Residents Standard Resulting Status Library Building Square Feet 41,419 91,180 454.26 454.26 Future Standard Equal to Existing Standard Library Collection Items 149,000 91,180 1634.13 1665.25 Future Standard Less than Existing Standard Library Bookmobile 0.26 91,180 0.0029 0.0029 Future Standard Equal to Existing Standard Number of Cost
Facility Cost Future EDUs Per EDU
Library Facility Costs $62,019,000 47,889 $1,295
Library Collection Item Costs $14,859,736 47,889 $310
Bookmobile Costs $245,288 47,889 $5
Total $77,124,024 NA $1,610
EDUs per EDUs per Units / Fees per Fees per 1,000 SF / Cost Financed Land Use Type Unit [2] 1,000 SF / Room [2] 1,000 SF / Rooms Unit Room by DIF Residential Units 1.00 NA 41,629 $1,610.48 NA $67,042,630 Retail/Commercial NA 0.239 6,112 NA $384.46 $2,349,948
Office NA 0.335 1,308 NA $539.59 $705,867
Industrial NA 0.222 15,224 NA $357.60 $5,443,997
Hotel/Motel NA 0.048 20,576 NA $76.87 $1,581,583
Cost Allocated to Future Development $77,124,024
Cost Allocated to Existing Development $2,496,664
Total Cost $79,620,688
Table 6
Development Impact Fee per Unit
Table 4
Table 5
Proposed Facilities and Cost Per Unit
]

Parks Fee Model

11/5/2025
Formula (Quimby park in-lieu of land dediction fee)
Fee = [(Total Costs per Acre) x (City Park Standard) x Density per unit ] / 1,000 Part I
Cost of Land per Acre = $5,000,000[1]
Development Cost per Acre = $1,834,740[2]
Total Costs per Acre $6,834,740
Part II
City Park Standard per 1,000 Residents 2.00 Acres
Part III SFD & SFA 2-4 Plex 5-Plex or more Mobile Homes Total Number of Existing Residents 180,424 43,241 99,206 10,823 333,694 (From 2023 US Census Data per Quimby) [3] Number of Existing Units 53,876 12,156 40,477 3,250 109,759 (From 2023 US Census Data per Quimby) [4] Density per Unit 3.3489 3.5572 2.4509 3.3302 3.0402
Part IV
Fee per Residential Unit SFD & SFA 2-4 Plex 5-Plex or more Mobile Homes Total Costs per Acre $6,834,740 $6,834,740 $6,834,740 $6,834,740 per acre x City Park Standard 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Acres per 1,000 residents x Density per Unit 3.3489 3.5572 2.4509 3.3302 Residents per Unit / 1,000
Fee per Residential Dwelling Unit $45,777.38 $48,624.71 $33,502.84 $45,521.47 per Unit [1] Based on Keyser Marston land analysis dated 5/13/2024. [2] Based on development costs provided by City 5/28/24. [3] Based on population for the City of Anaheim indicated in the 2023 ACS 1-Year Estimates Report #B25033 from US Census Data. [4] Based on unit counts for the City of Anaheim indicated in the 2023 ACS 1-Year Estimates Report #B25032 from US Census Data.

City of Anaheim
Park Facilities
Fee Calculation

18201 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 220
IRVINE, CA 92612
PHONE
:
(800) 969
-
4DTA
Public Finance
Public
-
Private Partnerships
Development Economics
Clean Energy Bonds
www.

FinanceDTA
.com

Anaheim City CouncilMarch 24, 2026

Anaheim City Council
March 24, 2026