Anaheim City Council
April 7, 2026

Figure 3.14 - Fullerton Station Access Mode
Source: Metrolink 2018 On-Board Survey
Table 3.13 - Fullerton Station Amtrak Service Statistics

Daily
Peak Off-Peak
Amtrak Frequency 60 to 120 min 120 to 180 min
Amtrak Service Span 6:18 am-11:18 pm
Amtrak Average Daily Boardings at Station 488 (2022)
Source: CR Associates (2025)
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Dropped Off or Picked Up
Carpool
Drive My car
Transfer - Train
Transfer - Bus
Lyft/Uber
Bicycle
Walk
Other
Percent of Passengers
Fullerton Station Access Mode
Weekend
Weekday
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report

4.0 On-Demand Services Evaluation
There are two on-demand transit services in Anaheim, FRAN, and EVE. Both are operated by ATN.

4.1 FRAN
FRAN, or Free Rides Around the Neighborhood, is a microtransit service that operates in a five-mile radius around Anaheim’s Packing District and Center City.

4.1.1 Fares
As the name suggests, FRAN, or Free Rides Around the Neighborhood, is a free microtransit service.

Riders can request free rides using the QR code posted at FRAN stops (to submit a ride request form) or on the mobile app.

4.1.2 Span of Service
FRAN operates on-demand services from 12:00pm to 11:00pm daily. In 2023, the average wait time for FRAN riders after requesting a ride was 3.2 minutes. On-time performance as of the March 2024 operations report was 97%.

4.1.3 Ridership
FRAN picks up and drops off passengers at 18 designed locations across the Packing District and Center City. There were 1,449 FRAN riders in February 2024, which was an increase from 974 riders in February 2023. As reported in the March 2024 operations report, FRAN ridership increased by 35% from the previous year.

4.2 EVE
EVE, or Everyone Ventures Everywhere, connects travelers between the John Wayne Orange County Airport and the Anaheim Resort Area.

4.2.1 Fares
EVE fares are $15.00 one-way for adults. There is a reduced fare for children, seniors, and people with disabilities. Passengers may ride ATN’s ART route trips for free on the day of their EVE trip for free by showing their EVE receipt. Rides can be booked on-demand or up to 90 days in advance and can be purchased on the mobile app, during boarding with a debit/credit card or mobile device, or with cash.

4.2.2 Span of Service
EVE operates on a reservation/on-demand system from 6:30am to 12:30am. In 2023, the average wait time for EVE riders after requesting a ride was 3.5 minutes. On-time performance as of the March 2024 operations report was 96%.

4.2.3 Ridership
EVE picks up and drops off passengers at designated bus stops for transportation to or from the airport. 2023 was the first complete year of service for EVE and had a total yearly ridership of Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report

11,148 passengers. There were 1,600 EVE riders in February 2024, which was an increase from 325 riders in February 2023, just one month after the start of service.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report

5.0 Paratransit Services and Senior Services
Paratransit services play a critical role in ensuring equitable access to transportation for individuals with disabilities and senior citizens. As a federally mandated requirement for transit agencies, paratransit services provide an essential alternative for individuals who are unable to use regular fixed-route buses. In Anaheim, two primary paratransit programs serve different segments of the population: OC Access, operated by OCTA, and Senior Wheels, operated by ATN. These services ensure that community members have access to vital transportation options for medical appointments, shopping, social activities, and other essential needs, enhancing mobility and independence for those who may otherwise face barriers to transit access.

5.1 OC Access
OC Access is a shared-ride paratransit service operated by OCTA throughout Orange County (including Anaheim) for individuals with disabilities who cannot use regular fixed-route buses. It complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and serves origins and destinations within ¾ of a mile of OCTA's fixed-route network. Riders must be pre-approved through an eligibility process.

Trips can be booked 1–3 days in advance, and the service operates during the same hours as the fixed-route buses. Fares are set at $3.60 per one-way trip for adults; youth (6–18 years) and personal care attendants ride for free. Additional companions pay $3.60 per trip.

5.2 Senior Wheels
Senior Wheels is a transportation program for Anaheim residents aged 60 and older, offering rides within a 10-mile radius for medical appointments, grocery shopping, social activities, and recreation.

It operates Monday through Friday (7:00 am–6:00 pm) and weekends (9:00 am–4:00 pm). Nonemergency medical trips to specific locations are also provided. Fares are $2.00 per round trip with vouchers. Free rides are available to City-sponsored meal sites. Reservations are available on a firstcome, first-served basis. Riders typically schedule trips in advance through local senior centers or community organizations. Applications and vouchers can be obtained online, by mail, or at community centers.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report

6.0 Additional Mobility Services
This section outlines various transportation options available in and around Anaheim, highlighting services that can complement the City’s existing transit network. These options provide additional mobility choices for commuters, tourists, and other users. Publicly funded shuttles, such as the iShuttle (not currently operating in Anaheim) and the Anaheim Canyon Circulator, play a role in enhancing connectivity by linking major transit hubs with key destinations. Private service providers, including regional intercity bus services and on-demand taxi options, offer flexible and convenient transportation solutions. Together, these services enhance mobility and accessibility, contributing to a comprehensive and integrated transportation system for Anaheim.

6.1 Publicly Funded Shuttles
Publicly funded shuttles play a vital role in enhancing regional connectivity and providing costeffective transit solutions for commuters. Although the iShuttle does not currently operate in Anaheim, it exemplifies the type of service that could greatly benefit the city by linking major transit hubs with employment centers. In Anaheim, the Anaheim Canyon Circulator serves as a key example of a community-based transit initiative, improving local access and mobility through dedicated shuttle services.

6.1.1 iShuttle
The iShuttle is a commuter shuttle service operated by OCTA that connects Metrolink stations with key employment centers in Orange County. Designed to facilitate seamless transfers from Metrolink trains to local destinations, the iShuttle offers a cost-effective and convenient transportation option for commuters. The service operates during weekday commuter peak hours, aligning with Metrolink train schedules to ensure timely connections. Fares are $1 for a single cash ride or $5 for a pre-paid 10-ride card. Transfers from Metrolink, Amtrak, or OC Bus services are free.

For the City of Anaheim, the iShuttle program could be a valuable addition to its transportation options. By expanding the service to include ARTIC, it could encourage greater use of public transportation, particularly for commuters traveling to and from Irvine and Tustin. This could also complement the Anaheim Canyon Circulator, which is a similar service operated by ATN and serving that Metrolink station.

6.1.2 Anaheim Canyon Circulator / OCTA Project V Community-Based Transit/Circulators Program
The Anaheim Canyon Circulator is a community-based transit service designed to enhance connectivity between the Anaheim Canyon Metrolink Station and key destinations within the City including the Anaheim Resort and Disneyland Resort, Kaiser Permanente Anaheim Medical Center, and Anaheim City Hall. It provides a connection to the Downtown Community Senior Center and several schools. Initiated in July 2020 as part of the OCTA Project V Community-Based Transit/Circulator, the service operates using two fully electric buses. This service uses two fully electric buses to meet four trains in the morning and three trains in the afternoon at Anaheim Canyon Station. The current service provider is ATN. The City received the 2024 grant to continue the service through 2030/2031.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report

The OCTA Project V Community-Based Transit/Circulator was established under Measure M2 to support local jurisdictions in developing transit services that complement regional bus and rail systems. The program provides competitive funding for community-based circulators, shuttles, and trolleys, aiming to address specific local transit needs and enhance connectivity within communities.

6.2 Private Service Providers
Private service providers offer a diverse range of transportation options that enhance mobility for Anaheim’s residents and visitors. Regional intercity bus services, such as Megabus, Greyhound, Tres Estrellas de Oro, and Rally, connect Anaheim to major cities and destinations, with convenient stops at ARTIC. Additionally, on-demand taxi services, including Uber, Lyft, California Yellow Cab, RideYellow, and SIXT Ride, provide flexible and convenient travel within and around the city.

6.2.1 Regional Private Intercity Bus Services
Anaheim is served by several regional intercity bus services, providing convenient transportation options for residents and visitors. The following services have stops at ARTIC:
• Megabus offers low-cost express service with stops at the Anaheim ARTIC, connecting passengers to destinations such as Las Vegas and San Francisco. • Greyhound operates multiple daily routes providing service to major cities across California and beyond.
• Tres Estrellas de Oro serves the Hispanic community with routes to Tiajuana and Guadalajara • Rally is a crowdsourced bus service that offers on-demand trips for events and group travel, with flexible pickup points determined by demand, often including ARTIC.

6.2.2 On-Demand Taxi
Several on-demand taxi services operate in the City of Anaheim. These services include but are not limited to the following:
• Uber and Lyft are widely available in Anaheim. These popular ride-hailing platforms allow passengers to book rides via their mobile apps, providing flexible and convenient transportation throughout the City.
• California Yellow Cab offers comprehensive coverage throughout Orange County, including Anaheim. Customers can book rides via phone, online, or through their mobile app. • RideYellow connects users with knowledgeable local drivers through an easy-to-use app, ensuring prompt and reliable transportation.
• SIXT Ride is a service that allows users to book taxis in Anaheim through their app, providing immediate pickup, live tracking, and cashless payment.

With these services, residents and visitors in Anaheim have a wide range of options for on-demand transportation.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report

7.0 Planned Transit Services
This section outlines planned transit services that will shape the future of Anaheim’s transportation network. These initiatives, including the California High-Speed Rail project and Metrolink SCORE program, aim to expand transit options, enhance regional connectivity, and support sustainable mobility. By integrating these upcoming services, Anaheim is planned to become a key hub in Southern California's evolving transit landscape.

7.1 California High-Speed Rail (CAHSR) Project – Los Angeles – Anaheim Section
The future CAHSR in Anaheim is part of the broader Phase 1 initiative to connect Northern and Southern California with a fast, eco-friendly rail system. The Los Angeles to Anaheim (LA-A) project section will provide a direct link between Los Angeles Union Station and ARTIC along a 30-mile portion of the LOSSAN corridor. The CAHSR service will offer high-speed electric trains powered by renewable energy, reducing travel times, greenhouse gas emissions, and traffic congestion. It will also improve safety through new grade separations, enhancing the flow of both rail and vehicular traffic. The ARTIC station will serve as a key terminus, connecting high-speed rail with major destinations in Anaheim and linking transit services like Metrolink, OCTA, and ATN. The project, expected to significantly boost regional mobility and stimulate economic growth, will include upgrades to existing rail infrastructure, with the potential for new grade separations in Anaheim to improve safety and reduce congestion at key crossings. The CAHSR service will transform travel within the region, making Anaheim a major hub in California’s growing high-speed rail network. This project section has not been fully environmentally cleared and there is no timeline for construction as the current focus of construction is Central California.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report

Figure 7.1 - California High-Speed Rail Los Angeles to Anaheim Project Section (2023) Source: California High-Speed Rail Authority

7.2 Metrolink SCORE Program
Metrolink's SCORE program is a $10 billion capital improvement initiative aimed at enhancing the Metrolink commuter rail system in time for the 2028 Olympic and Paralympic Games. The program focuses on grade crossings, station and signal improvements, as well as track additions, to increase safety, service frequency, and connectivity across the region.

While the specific projects within Anaheim are still being finalized, the SCORE program is expected to bring significant benefits to the City. Some potential improvements include:
• Increased Service Frequency: More frequent train service on the Orange County Line will provide riders with greater flexibility and convenience. • Improved Station Amenities: Upgrades to Metrolink stations in the Anaheim area, such as Anaheim Canyon and Fullerton, could include improved accessibility, better passenger waiting areas, and enhanced security features.
• Enhanced Safety Features: The SCORE program will invest in safety upgrades, such as improved crossing signals and warning systems, to reduce accidents and improve overall safety.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report

By investing in these improvements, Metrolink aims to make rail travel a more attractive and efficient option for Anaheim residents and commuters.

7.3 LOSSAN Initiatives
The LOSSAN Rail Corridor is a vital transportation route serving Southern California, including the City of Anaheim. Various ongoing and potential initiatives along the corridor may influence regional rail operations and infrastructure in the future. One such initiative includes track and signal improvements near the Fullerton area, which could help enhance rail efficiency and reduce delays for trains traveling through Anaheim. These upgrades aim to support more streamlined operations and improved service reliability across multiple destinations. To improve safety and traffic flow along the corridor, agencies are exploring long-term strategies that include grade separation projects at key intersections. While these efforts are still under review, they reflect a broader regional interest in minimizing conflicts between rail and roadway traffic.

Additionally, in response to coastal climate impacts, there are other discussions about realigning certain segments of the LOSSAN corridor. Although these considerations focus on coastal areas, potential changes to the corridor could eventually influence travel patterns and service planning throughout the region, including in Anaheim.

7.4 LA Metro Initiatives
Metro’s NextGen Plan recommends increasing the frequency of Line 460 from roughly 45 minutes on weekdays and weekends to every 30 minutes on weekdays and weekends.

Metro’s LA County Rail Network Integration Study recommends a new Metrolink “tripper” service between the Laguna Niguel and Chatsworth stations, operating with daily hourly service.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report

Source: CR Associates, Metro

7.5 ATN Initiatives
ATN’s ANNA Multimodal Transportation Plan includes transit route recommendations for more eastwest connectivity between ARTIC and the Resort Area via Katella Avenue. The ANNA plan recommends improvements to bus stops, first-last mile connections, pedestrian conditions, and bicycle infrastructure surrounding the new transit route(s).

Figure 7.2 - LA Metro Rail Network Integration (2024)
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report

Figure 7.3 – Proposed ANNA Routes and Stop Locations (2024) Source: ATN
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report

8.0 Existing and Planned Roadway
Improvements
Section 8 offers a detailed evaluation of existing and planned roadway improvements in Anaheim, focusing on enhancing transit accessibility and efficiency. It identifies 25 critical intersections for targeted improvements based on current traffic conditions and intersection capacity utilization (ICU).

The analysis also addresses pedestrian infrastructure, highlighting approximately 31 linear miles of missing sidewalks within a ¼-mile radius of transit stops. An additional analysis looked at sidewalk gaps within ½ mile of high-use bus stops. Both analyses will guide potential FLM improvement recommendations. Additionally, operational and access analyses of existing and proposed bike facilities within ¼-mile and 3-mile radii of transit stops identified opportunities for upgrades and enhanced connectivity, suggesting that these improvements would benefit transit riders. Together, these efforts aim to strengthen multimodal connectivity and access across Anaheim's transportation network.

8.1 Existing Roadway Conditions
A review was conducted to determine locations within the City that are candidates for potential improvements to improve transit speed and reliability. To determine these locations a variety of screening criteria were used utilizing data provided by the City of Anaheim. These criteria are listed below:
 Any intersection proposed to be studied must have at least one (1) transit route traversing through it. Priority was given to intersections that have transit routes along both intersecting roadways.
 The current City of Anaheim Circulation Element was consulted to determine the current classification of all roadways with transit routes within the City of Anaheim. Priority was given to intersections along roadways classified as major arterials.  Peak hour traffic volume data from the City of Anaheim was examined to find existing highvolume hot spots.  Ridership data from OCTA was evaluated to identify roadways along which ridership is highest.  Supplemental information from the City of Anaheim regarding arterial segment level of service and intersection capacity utilization (ICU) was assessed as a final check for hot spots.

Figure 8.1 displays a map of the City of Anaheim showcasing all roadways with transit routes within City limits.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report

Figure 8.1 - Transit Routes in the City of Anaheim (2024) Source: CR Associates, City of Anaheim

8.1.1 Transit Route Roadway Classification and Average Daily Traffic As stated previously, the current City of Anaheim Circulation Element (May 2004) was taken into consideration to identify the roadway classification for all roadways with transit routes (the Circulation Element DRAFT released 12/2024 was also referenced). Roadway average daily traffic (ADT) was provided by the City of Anaheim. This data was collected in October 2021. Figure 8.2 displays the roadway classification for all roadways with transit routes. Figure 8.3 displays the roadway ADT for all roadways with transit routes. Excerpts from the City of Anaheim Circulation Element are displayed in Appendix B.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report

Figure 8.2 - City of Anaheim Roadway Classifications
Source: CR Associates, City of Anaheim
Figure 8.3 - Existing Roadway Average Daily Traffic
Source: CR Associates, City of Anaheim
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report

8.1.2 Transit Ridership
Transit ridership data within the City of Anaheim was provided by OCTA and Anaheim Transit Network (ATN). This data was reviewed to determine which bus stops have the highest daily ridership. Figure

8.4 displays locations of peak ridership within the City of Anaheim.

Figure 8.4 - Existing Peak Boardings

Source: CR Associates, City of Anaheim

8.1.3 Study Area
Based on the criteria previously outlined, the following twenty-five (25) intersections were selected to be analyzed for potential improvements to improve transit speed and reliability:

1. S Beach Boulevard & Lincoln Avenue

2. S Beach Boulevard & Orange Avenue

3. S Beach Boulevard & W Ball Road

4. Brookhurst Street & W La Palma Avenue

5. Brookhurst Street & Lincoln Avenue

6. Brookhurst Street & W Ball Road

7. Brookhurst Street & W Katella Avenue

8. Euclid Street & Lincoln Avenue

9. Euclid Street & W Ball Road

10. Euclid Street & W Katella Avenue

11. S Harbor Boulevard & Lincoln Avenue

12. S Harbor Boulevard & W Ball Road

13. S Harbor Boulevard & Disney Way

14. S Harbor Boulevard & W Katella Avenue

15. S Anaheim Boulevard & Lincoln Avenue
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report

16. S Anaheim Boulevard & E Ball Road

17. S Anaheim Boulevard & Disney Way

18. S Anaheim Boulevard & W Katella Avenue

19. S State College Boulevard & E La Palma Avenue

20. S State College Boulevard & Lincoln Avenue

21. S State College Boulevard & E Ball Road

22. S State College Boulevard & E Katella Avenue

23. N Tustin Avenue & Miraloma Avenue

24. N Tustin Avenue & E La Palma Avenue

25. Imperial Highway & E La Palma Avenue
Figure 8.5 illustrates the studied intersections.

8.1.4 Existing Peak Hour Intersection Volumes
Before the analysis of potential improvements, an existing baseline must be established.

Intersection peak hour traffic counts were provided by the City of Anaheim. These counts were conducted in October 2021. Figure 8.6 displays the AM and PM peak hour counts for all study area intersections. Traffic count sheets are provided in Appendix C.

Figure 8.5 - Studied Intersections with City Limits
Source: CR Associates, City of Anaheim
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report

Figure 8.6 -Traffic Volumes – Existing Conditions AM/PM Counts Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report

Source: CR Associates, City of Anaheim

8.1.5 Existing Intersection ICU Results
Intersection capacity utilization (ICU) results for all study intersections were provided by the City of Anaheim. ICU analysis is done by comparing peak hour intersection volumes to the lane capacity for all approaches. Figures 8.8 and 8.9 display the ICU results for all analyzed intersections.

Intersections that would benefit the most from improvements are those with an ICU of C or D.

Figure 8.7 - Existing ICU Results - AM Peak Hour
Source: CR Associates, City of Anaheim
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report

Figure 8.8 - Existing ICU Results – PM Peak Hour
Source: CR Associates, City of Anaheim

8.1.6 Bike Facilities and Sidewalks Along Key Transit Routes This section focuses on the critical role of bicycle facilities and sidewalks in supporting FLM connections along key transit routes in Anaheim. It presents an evaluation of existing and proposed bicycle infrastructure and highlights areas for potential improvements. The section also addresses sidewalk accessibility, analyzing gaps in pedestrian infrastructure near transit stops and congested intersections to identify opportunities for improving connectivity and enhancing multimodal access throughout the city.

8.1.7 Bicycle Facilities
Bicycle facilities are key FLM connections that support current and future mobility within Anaheim.

Per SCAG’s Bike Routes data set, the City has 66.58 centerline miles of bicycle facilities within City limits. Additionally, there are 113.38 miles of proposed bicycle facilities. The bike facilities in this data set were based on those in the 2017 Bicycle Master Plan (see Section 2.4.1.2) but have since been updated as recently as 2024 with City input. Figure 8.9 maps the existing and proposed bicycle facilities within the City of Anaheim.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report

Figure 8.9 - Anaheim Existing and Proposed Bicycle Facilities Source: CR Associates, SCAG
Access and operational analyses were conducted on current and proposed bicycle facilities using data from SCAG.
• Operational Analysis: An initial filter was applied to look at whether there were any existing or proposed bicycle facilities within a quarter-mile buffer from the 651 OCTA and ATN physical bus stops within the city limits. The purpose of this analysis was to assess the current and proposed state of bicycle facilities citywide. Of the 651, 301 stops have bicycle facilities within a ¼ mile buffer.

To narrow potential improvements, the existing and proposed bicycle facilities were further screened using the 25 previously selected intersections (see Section 8.1.3 above). Within ¼ mile radius of these intersections, there are 5.92 miles of existing bicycle facilities and 12.13 miles of proposed bicycle facilities. These existing bicycle facility segments are candidates for upgrades in bicycle facility class and potential locations for additional bicycle features.

The proposed facilities could be prioritized for implementation. • Access Analysis: As is standard for bicycle access analyses, we looked at where bicycle facilities exist and are proposed within a 3-mile radius of the highest ridership transit stops.

This covers most of the City other than Anaheim Hills. This suggests that any improvements to bicycle facilities would also benefit transit riders.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report

Figure 8.10 - Existing and Proposed Bicycle Facilities Near Top Ridership Bus Stops Source: CR Associates, SCAG

8.1.8 Sidewalks
Two analyses were conducted on sidewalk assessments using missing sidewalk data provided by the City of Anaheim. A filter was applied to correlate missing sidewalks with transit stops lacking buffers (see Figure 8.11). By evaluating traffic and sidewalk conditions near each of these stops, opportunities can be identified where traffic improvements may also enhance pedestrian conditions, and where FLM access to high-use bus stops can be directly assessed. i. Related to the congested intersections: An analysis assessed pedestrian accessibility to the 651 OCTA and ATN physical bus stops within the city limits. The analysis looked at missing sidewalks within a quarter-mile buffer of these stops. This analysis (in addition to other factors) will be used to make suggestions to improve accessibility to key transit stops within the city. Of the 651 stops, 301 have missing sidewalk(s) within a ¼ mile buffer. The total linear feet of missing sidewalks within a quarter mile of these stops is 161,753 feet or almost 31 linear miles. This number was further screened using the 25 selected intersections (see Section 8.1.3 above). Within ¼ mile radius of these intersections, there are 20,983 linear feet, or just under 4 miles, of missing sidewalks. These 4 linear miles will be the starting point for determining sidewalk improvements. Other qualitative and quantitative analyses in future phases of this project will determine the nature and location of the recommended improvements.
ii. Focus ½ mile FLM around bus stops and rail stations: The lack of sidewalks around high use stops presents an opportunity to improve conditions and make transit more attractive (see Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report

Figure 8.12). Likewise, the lack of sidewalks around low-use stops could lower the attractiveness of these stops, which will be explored further in this planning process.

Figure 8.11 - Missing Sidewalks Near Bus Stops

Source: CR Associates, City of Anaheim
Figure 8.12 - Missing Sidewalks 1/2 Mile Radius from Top Ridership Bus Stops Source: CR Associates, City of Anaheim
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report

8.2 Planned Network Changes (General Plan Circulation
Element Update)
The City of Anaheim is in the process of updating its Circulation Element.1 The City's current Circulation Element was adopted in 2004 and is currently being updated (draft update released 12/18/24) to accommodate changes in transportation needs, new technologies, and other projects such as the City's 2021-2029 Housing Element. While the General Plan Circulation Update is still in development, it is expected that only two short sections of two streets (Lemon Street and Raymond Avenue) north of the 91 Freeway in northern Anaheim will be reclassified. Both these streets are currently classified as Secondary Arterials and will be reclassified as Primary Arterials. 1 This section reflects the planning context as of late 2024, when the Circulation Element update and other related initiatives were still in progress. The update has since been finalized, but the original language has been retained for consistency within the document.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report

9.0 Summary
This section summarizes the key findings from this report to inform opportunities for improving transit in Anaheim and outlines the next steps for the Anaheim Transit Master Plan. High-ridership areas are potential locations for improvements such as new amenities (e.g., shelters, benches) and new bike/pedestrian connections as they can improve mobility for large numbers of people.

Increasing frequency, bus speeds and travel time reliability (through bus lanes, queue jumps, and transit signal priority) have been demonstrated elsewhere to grow ridership while also enhancing service for existing riders. Other improvements, such as mobility (being able to get to desired places within and outside of Anaheim), should also be considered as ways to increase ridership. Public outreach that will be conducted later in this project will help inform what mobility improvements are desired by the community.

9.1 Key Findings
Past planned transit improvements not yet implemented
Many improvements identified in past plans have not yet been implemented. Examples include the potential expansion of OC Flex on-demand service in Anaheim, high-capacity transit from ARTIC to the Anaheim Resort, and Enhanced Bus service on several corridors. These should be re-examined as part of this study for applicability and potential refinement.

Fares and transfer policies vary and are complicated
There is considerable variability in the adult cash fare across providers. The difference was most notable between ATN ($4.00) and OCTA ($2.00), two of Anaheim’s biggest transit operators. Also notable is the complexity of the transfer policies between providers. Transfers between OCTA and ATN are available for OCTA pass holders only (cash-only single rider ATN passengers are ineligible), and there are no free transfers between LA Metro and ATN as well as RTA and ATN. There is an opportunity to examine the fare integration and transfer policies of all agencies to simplify the fare structure, making it easier to understand and allowing for more seamless transfers.

Road operations – reliability and speed
Some of Anaheim’s main corridors, such as Katella Avenue, Harbor Boulevard, and Lincoln Avenue, present significant opportunities for transit improvements due to their high transit ridership. Transit improvements that align with grants and programs, such as the SMART Grant, HSIP Grant, and Harbor Boulevard Pilot Study, can enhance transit reliability, reduce congestion, and support multimodal transportation goals.

Potential Transit Improvements to examine further include:
• Transit Signal Priority (TSP)
• Dedicated Transit-Only Lanes
• Queue Jump Lanes
• Accessibility Enhancements for pedestrians, bikes, and automobiles • Multimodal Integration and connectivity

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report

ATN Opportunities
There are opportunities for ATN to improve its usability and accessibility for riders. Areas for enhancement include improving the visibility and clarity of bus stop signage. Addressing this aspect in future studies could help support more effective transit use and encourage increased ridership.

Opportunities to Enhance Metrolink service
Metrolink service at the three stations serving Anaheim operate at relatively low frequencies. Current average weekday ridership ranges from 535 riders at Fullerton Station to 137 riders at Anaheim Canyon Station. Weekend ridership is lower, ranging from 144 riders at Fullerton to 12 riders at the Anaheim Canyon Metrolink Station. While recent improvements have been made, there remains an opportunity to further enhance rail service at these stations, which could strengthen regional connectivity and help maximize the value of existing capital investments.

Driving is the most frequent access mode to rail stations Data from the most recent (2018) access survey from Metrolink revealed that on weekdays, most people (between 74% to 100%, depending on the station) drive their car to the station to catch the train. Those numbers are slightly lower on weekends. While the data is a little dated, and transit improvements have been implemented since then, this highlights a major opportunity to improve transit connections to these rail stations to reduce personal vehicle traffic on Anaheim streets, as well as reduce parking demand at the stations.

Bus service frequencies and operations
In Anaheim, weekday transit frequencies are generally consistent throughout the day, although certain roadways, like La Palma Avenue and Harbor Boulevard (north of Ball Road), have increased transit frequencies during peak times. This suggests a need for improvements that extend beyond peak periods on additional corridors to ensure consistent service throughout the day.

Integration of State and Regional Plans: The ATMP can further align with regional efforts such as the California State Rail Plan and the California ATP to reinforce shared priorities. These plans emphasize improving connectivity, increasing rail frequency, and integrating active transportation options, which align with Anaheim’s goals for a more connected and sustainable transit system.

Enhanced FLM Connections: There is a significant opportunity to improve FLM connectivity, particularly around major transit hubs like ARTIC and Anaheim Canyon Metrolink Stations. Strategies could include enhancing pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure, which is highlighted as a priority in several regional and state transportation initiatives.

Equity-Focused Improvements: Section 2.4.4.9 of the report discusses SB 960, which introduces equity-focused performance metrics for transit agencies. This presents an opportunity for Anaheim to prioritize investments that close service gaps and enhance connectivity for historically underserved populations.

Climate Resilience and Sustainability: The California Transportation Plan 2050 and other state policies emphasize the need for a resilient and sustainable transportation system. Aligning the ATMP with these objectives could help secure funding and ensure long-term environmental and economic benefits.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report

9.2 Next Steps
The next steps for the Anaheim Transit Master Plan will focus on analyzing community demographics and travel demand to identify areas with high ridership potential and opportunities for future transit investments. This will include overlaying ridership patterns with transit propensity to uncover latent demand and guide strategic short- and long-term recommendations. Building on findings from the existing conditions analysis, the Plan will establish actionable goals, objectives, and policies to address service gaps, enhance multimodal connectivity, and align transit improvements with land use and sustainability priorities. A significant component of this phase will involve robust stakeholder and public engagement to ensure that community input is integrated into the planning process.

Engaging local operators, regional partners, businesses, and residents will help refine priorities and guide solutions to identified gaps, ensuring the Plan is aligned with the diverse needs of Anaheim's population. Key objectives will prioritize equity by addressing underserved populations, increasing transit reliability and coverage, and leveraging regional projects like the California High-Speed Rail and Metrolink SCORE program to improve integration and connectivity.

9.2.1 Next Steps: Technical Analysis
The technical analysis phase of the Anaheim Transit Master Plan will delve into detailed evaluations of transit operations, infrastructure, and service needs. Technical analyses will provide a foundation for developing strategic recommendations that enhance transit reliability, accessibility, and overall user experience in Anaheim. Key areas of analysis will include:

Goals, Objectives, and Performance Metrics: Confirm goals and objectives – based on findings in policies and plans and work with the community, businesses, visitors and residents to reflect and comment on common goals.
• Align themes with funding strategies: Identifying potential funding strategies aligned with potential grant opportunities will help to ensure project recommendations can be implemented. Key areas of focus include: Mobility, Equity, Safety, Reduce Greenhouse Gases, Accessibility, and Economic Development.
• Define performance measures of success: Such measures could include reductions in travel times, increases in transit mode share, and improvements in connectivity to key destinations.

Demographic and Equity Data Analysis: We will gather and map demographic characteristics known to have an impact on transit ridership, utilizing Anaheim’s recently adopted metrics.

Travel Demand and Transit Market Analysis: Using existing ridership, demographic, and land-use data, identify high-demand transit areas, key activity centers, and emerging service needs.

Accessibility Analysis, including:
• Transit Fares: Simplify the system, making it easier for riders to understand, and enabling more seamless transfers.
• FLM Connections: Evaluate sidewalk and bike connections to hubs and major stops.

Operational Improvements, such as:

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report

• Potential TSP: Implementing TSP along high transit ridership corridors could optimize bus travel times and improve reliability. TSP technologies can prioritize buses at key intersections by extending green lights or shortening red lights for approaching transit vehicles. • Dedicated Transit-Only Lanes: Introducing dedicated transit-only lanes along these key corridors could reduce transit delays caused by mixed traffic and enhance the speed and reliability of bus services. These lanes could be designed to accommodate current traffic volumes while prioritizing transit.
• Queue Jump Lanes: Queue jump lanes at intersections would provide buses with a dedicated lane and priority signal phase, allowing them to bypass traffic and start ahead of general traffic when the signal turns green.
• Safety Treatments and Accessibility Enhancements: Measures such as upgraded traffic signals, pedestrian countdown timers, and high-visibility crosswalks could create a safer environment for pedestrians to access transit stops.

Transit Network Framework – Potential Improvements: Examine corridors, such as Katella Avenue, Harbor Boulevard, and Lincoln Avenue, which present significant opportunities for transit improvements due to their high transit ridership. Examine future transit connections based on projected growth and underutilized areas that show high propensity for ridership. • Multimodal Integration: Enhancing multimodal connectivity is critical for supporting firstmile/last-mile solutions. Improvements such as aligning transit with bike lanes and pedestrian pathways would promote sustainable transportation options. • Gap Analysis: Pinpoint deficiencies in service coverage, infrastructure, and access for disadvantaged communities, and map opportunities for enhanced multimodal integration.

9.2.2 Next Steps: Stakeholder and Public Engagement
Robust stakeholder and community engagement is critical to validate goals and objectives and ensure alignment with community needs. Public input will refine priorities and guide solutions to gaps identified in the technical analysis. Next steps include:

Stakeholder Meetings: Convene sessions with local operators (OCTA, ATN), regional partners (Metrolink, SCAG), and key business stakeholders (Disneyland, Anaheim Chamber of Commerce) to confirm alignment with broader regional policies.

Public Workshops: Organize workshops, ensuring representation from underserved and transit-dependent populations. Materials will be bilingual, and sessions will prioritize accessibility and inclusivity.

Advisory Committee Input: Seek feedback on draft goals, objectives, and initial findings to refine recommendations.

The combination of data-driven analysis and stakeholder engagement will ensure the TMP reflects Anaheim’s transit needs while addressing critical gaps in service, infrastructure, and land use. These steps will position the ATMP as a robust plan for improving mobility and accessibility in the city.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Appendix A - Existing Bus Route Profile Sheets
OCTA Routes
Table A.1 - OCTA Route 25: Fullerton to Huntington Beach

Weekday
Saturday Sunday Peak Off-Peak
Frequency 50 min 45-60 min 60 min 60 min
Service Span 4:06a-10:27p 5:54a-10:27p 5:54a-10:27p
Average Daily
Boardings in
Anaheim (Apr. 2024)
251 131 117
Source: CR Associates
Number of Stops in Anaheim (both directions): 12
Figure A.2 - OCTA Route 25 Overview Map
Source: Remix, CR Associates
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Figure A.3 - OCTA Route 25 Average Weekday Southbound Ridership Source: Remix, CR Associates

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Figure A.4 - OCTA Route 25 Average Weekday Northbound Ridership Source: Remix, CR Associates
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Table A.2 - OCTA Route 29: La Habra to Huntington Beach

Weekday
Saturday Sunday Peak Off-Peak
Frequency 26 min 25-30 min 20 min 20 min
Service Span 4:06a-1:13a 4:11a-1:13a 5:11a-12:27a
Average Daily
Boardings in
Anaheim (Apr. 2024)
641 589 523
Source: CR Associates
Number of Stops in Anaheim (both directions): 10
Figure A.5 - OCTA Route 29 Overview Map
Source: Remix, CR Associates

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Figure A.6 - OCTA Route 29 Average Weekday Northbound Ridership Source: Remix, CR Associates

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Figure A.7 - OCTA Route 29 Average Weekday Southbound Ridership Source: Remix, CR Associates

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Table A.3 - OCTA Route 30: Cerritos to Anaheim

Weekday
Saturday Sunday Peak Off-Peak
Frequency 45 min 30-45 min 60 min 60 min
Service Span 5:40a-10:04p 6:19a-9:03p 6:19a-9:03p
Average Daily
Boardings in
Anaheim (Apr. 2024)
325 94 86
Source: CR Associates
Number of Stops in Anaheim (both directions): 28
Figure A.8 - OCTA Route 30 Overview Map
Source: Remix, CR Associates

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Figure A.9 - OCTA Route 30 Average Weekday Eastbound Ridership Source: Remix, CR Associates
Figure A.10 - OCTA Route 30 Average Weekday Westbound Ridership Source: Remix, CR Associates
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Table A.4 - OCTA Route 33: Fullerton to Huntington Beach

Weekday
Saturday Sunday Peak Off-Peak
Frequency 40 min 40-60 min 75 min 75 min
Service Span 4:56a-9:37p 7:17a-7:34p 7:17a-7:34p
Average Daily
Boardings in
Anaheim (Apr. 2024)
489 138 117
Source: CR Associates
Number of Stops in Anaheim (both directions): 23
Figure A.11 - OCTA Route 33 Overview Map
Source: Remix, CR Associates

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Figure A.12 - OCTA Route 33 Average Weekday Northbound Ridership Source: Remix, CR Associates
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Figure A.13 - OCTA Route 33 Average Weekday Southbound Ridership Source: Remix, CR Associates
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Table A.5 - OCTA Route 35: Fullerton to Costa Mesa

Weekday
Saturday Sunday Peak Off-Peak
Frequency 40 min 40-60 min 45 min 50 min
Service Span 4:36a-9:58p 4:36a-9:58p 4:36a-9:58p
Average Daily
Boardings in
Anaheim (Apr. 2024)
608 335 283
Source: CR Associates

Number of Stops in Anaheim (both directions): 22
Figure A.14 - OCTA Route 35 Overview Map
Source: Remix, CR Associates

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Figure A.15 - OCTA Route 35 Average Weekday Northbound Ridership Source: Remix, CR Associates
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Figure A.16 - OCTA Route 35 Average Weekday Southbound Ridership Source: Remix, CR Associates
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Table A.6 - OCTA Route 37: La Habra to Fountain Valley

Weekday
Saturday Sunday Peak Off-Peak
Frequency 30 min 30 min 45 min 50 min
Service Span 4:23a-10:43p 5:10a-9:36p 6:50a-8:48p
Average Daily
Boardings in
Anaheim (Apr. 2024)
1940 1003 691
Source: CR Associates

Number of Stops in Anaheim (both directions): 31
Figure A.17 - OCTA Route 37 Overview Map
Source: Remix, CR Associates

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Figure A.18 - OCTA Route 37 Average Weekday Northbound Ridership Source: Remix, CR Associates
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Figure A.19 - OCTA Route 37 Average Weekday Southbound Ridership Source: Remix, CR Associates
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Table A.7 - OCTA Route 38: Lakewood to Anaheim Hills

Weekday
Saturday Sunday Peak Off-Peak
Frequency 20 min 20-50 min 50 min 60 min
Service Span 4:29a-11:07p 5:14a-9:22p 5:15a-9:24p
Average Daily
Boardings in
Anaheim (Apr. 2024)
3621 1252 1124
Source: CR Associates
Number of Stops in Anaheim (both directions): 86
Figure A.20 - OCTA Route 38 Overview Map2
Source: Remix, CR Associates
2 Route 38 was shortened in the Summer of 2024 to no longer serve the Anaheim Hills Festival Marketplace. Service now terminates at La Palma Avenue and Fairmont Boulevard. This map shows the alignment as of April 2024.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Figure A.21 - OCTA Route 38 Average Weekday Eastbound Ridership Source: Remix, CR Associates

Figure A.22 - OCTA Route 38 Average Weekday Westbound Ridership Source: Remix, CR Associates
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Table A.8 - OCTA Route 42: Seal Beach to Orange

Weekday
Saturday Sunday Peak Off-Peak
Frequency 22 min 20-60 min 25 min 25 min
Service Span 4:54a-12:19a 5:35a-9:24p 5:35a-9:24p
Average Daily
Boardings in
Anaheim (Apr. 2024)
3561 2358 1988
Source: CR Associates
Number of Stops in Anaheim (both directions): 65
Figure A.23 - OCTA Route 42 Overview Map
Source: Remix, CR Associates
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Figure A.24 - OCTA Route 42 Average Weekday Eastbound Ridership Source: Remix, CR Associates

Figure A.25 - OCTA Route 42 Average Weekday Westbound Ridership Source: Remix, CR Associates
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Table A.9 - OCTA Route 42A: Seal Beach to Orange

Weekday
Saturday Sunday Peak Off-Peak
Frequency 22 min 20-60 min 25 min 25 min
Service Span 4:54a-12:19a 5:35a-9:24p 5:35a-9:24p
Average Daily
Boardings in
Anaheim (Apr. 2024)
3561 2358 1988
Source: CR Associates
Number of Stops in Anaheim (both directions): 65
Figure A.26 - OCTA Route 42A Overview Map
Source: Remix, CR Associates
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Figure A.27 - OCTA Route 42A Average Weekday Eastbound Ridership Source: Remix, CR Associates

Figure A.28 - OCTA Route 42A Average Weekday Westbound Ridership Source: Remix, CR Associates

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Table A.10 - OCTA Route 43: Fullerton to Costa Mesa

Weekday
Saturday Sunday Peak Off-Peak
Frequency 22 min 15-60 min 15 min 15 min
Service Span 3:47a-1:45a 3:59a-1:45a 3:59a-1:45a
Average Daily
Boardings in
Anaheim (Apr. 2024)
2792 2639 2632
Source: CR Associates
Number of Stops in Anaheim (both directions): 33
Figure A.29 - OCTA Route 43 Overview Map
Source: Remix, CR Associates
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Figure A.30 - OCTA Route 43 Average Weekday Northbound Ridership Source: Remix, CR Associates
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Figure A.31 - OCTA Route 43 Average Weekday Southbound Ridership Source: Remix, CR Associates

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Table A.11 - OCTA Route 46: Long Beach to Orange

Weekday
Saturday Sunday Peak Off-Peak
Frequency 42 min 40-45 min 55 min 55 min
Service Span 4:50a-11:03p 6:32a-11:06p 6:32a-11:06p
Average Daily
Boardings in
Anaheim (Apr. 2024)
1942 1042 981
Source: CR Associates
Number of Stops in Anaheim (both directions): 67
Figure A.32 - OCTA Route 46 Overview Map
Source: Remix, CR Associates
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Figure A.33 - OCTA Route 46 Average Weekday Eastbound Ridership Source: Remix, CR Associates

Figure A.34 - OCTA Route 46 Average Weekday Westbound Ridership Source: Remix, CR Associates
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Table A.12 - OCTA Route 47: Fullerton to Balboa

Weekday
Saturday Sunday Peak Off-Peak
Frequency 20 min 15-70 min 20 min 20 min
Service Span 3:57a-11:58p 4:55a-10:54p 4:55a-10:54p
Average Daily
Boardings in
Anaheim (Apr. 2024)
2940 1553 1585
Source: CR Associates

Number of Stops in Anaheim (both directions): 42
Figure A.35 - OCTA Route 47 Overview Map
Source: Remix, CR Associates
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Figure A.36 - OCTA Route 47 Average Weekday Northbound Ridership Source: Remix, CR Associates
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Figure A.37 - OCTA Route 47 Average Weekday Southbound Ridership Source: Remix, CR Associates
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Table A.13 - OCTA Route 50: Long Beach to Orange

Weekday
Saturday Sunday Peak Off-Peak
Frequency 20 min 20-60 min 40 min 40 min
Service Span 3:48a-1:54a 4:03a-1:54a 4:03a-1:27a
Average Daily
Boardings in
Anaheim (Apr. 2024)
2362 1358 1254
Source: CR Associates
Number of Stops in Anaheim (both directions): 32
Figure A.38 - OCTA Route 50 Overview Map
Source: Remix, CR Associates
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Figure A.39 - OCTA Route 50 Average Weekday Eastbound Ridership Source: Remix, CR Associates

Figure A.40 - OCTA Route 50 Average Weekday Westbound Ridership Source: Remix, CR Associates

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Table A.14 - OCTA Route 53: Anaheim to Irvine

Weekday
Saturday Sunday Peak Off-Peak
Frequency 22 min 20-60 min 20 min 20 min
Service Span 4:01a-1:09a 5:38a-12:54a 5:38a-12:54a
Average Daily
Boardings in
Anaheim (Apr. 2024)
97 112 102
Source: CR Associates
Number of Stops in Anaheim (both directions): 2
Figure A.41 - OCTA Route 53 Overview Map
Source: Remix, CR Associates

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Figure A.42 - OCTA Route 53 Average Weekday Northbound Ridership Source: Remix, CR Associates
Figure A.43 - OCTA Route 53 Average Weekday Southbound Ridership Source: Remix, CR Associates
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Table A.15 - OCTA Route 54: Garden Grove to Orange

Weekday
Saturday Sunday Peak Off-Peak
Frequency 15 min 20-30 min 30 min 32 min
Service Span 4:46a-10:51p 6:00a-10:05p 6:29a-10:40p
Average Daily
Boardings in
Anaheim (Apr. 2024)
24 11 3
Source: CR Associates
Number of Stops in Anaheim (both directions): 1
Figure A.44 - OCTA Route 54 Overview Map
Source: Remix, CR Associates

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
No average weekday eastbound ridership data available

Figure A.45 - OCTA Route 54 Average Weekday Westbound Ridership Source: Remix, CR Associates

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Table A.16 - OCTA Route 57: Brea to Newport Beach

Weekday
Saturday Sunday Peak Off-Peak
Frequency 16 min 15-60 min 18 min 18 min
Service Span 3:58a-1:45a 3:57a-2:00a 3:57a-2:14a
Average Daily
Boardings in
Anaheim (Apr. 2024)
2621 1517 1318
Source: CR Associates
Number of Stops in Anaheim (both directions): 39
Figure A.46 - OCTA Route 57 Overview Map
Source: Remix, CR Associates

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Figure A.47 - OCTA Route 57 Average Weekday Northbound Ridership Source: Remix, CR Associates
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Figure A.48 - OCTA Route 57 Average Weekday Southbound Ridership Source: Remix, CR Associates
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Table A.17 - OCTA Route 59: Anaheim to Irvine

Weekday
Saturday Sunday Peak Off-Peak
Frequency 42 min 45 min 55 min 55 min
Service Span 4:38a-11:11p 5:47a-10:32p 8:51a-10:32p
Average Daily
Boardings in
Anaheim (Apr. 2024)
146 132 41
Source: CR Associates
Number of Stops in Anaheim (both directions): 5
Figure A.49 - OCTA Route 59 Overview Map
Source: Remix, CR Associates

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Figure A.50 - OCTA Route 59 Average Weekday Northbound Ridership Source: Remix, CR Associates

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Figure A.51 - OCTA Route 59 Average Weekday Southbound Ridership Source: Remix, CR Associates

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Table A.18 - OCTA Route 71: Yorba Linda to Newport Beach

Weekday
Saturday Sunday Peak Off-Peak
Frequency 50 min 45-60 min 45 min 50 min
Service Span 5:23a-10:45p 5:56a-10:00p 5:46a-10:14p
Average Daily
Boardings in
Anaheim (Apr. 2024)
161 84 71
Source: CR Associates
Number of Stops in Anaheim (both directions): 10
Figure A.52 - OCTA Route 71 Overview Map
Source: Remix, CR Associates

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Figure A.53 - OCTA Route 71 Average Weekday Northbound Ridership Source: Remix, CR Associates

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Figure A.54 - OCTA Route 71 Average Weekday Southbound Ridership Source: Remix, CR Associates

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Table A.19 - OCTA Route 83: Anaheim to Laguna Hills

Weekday
Saturday Sunday Peak Off-Peak
Frequency 30 min 30-60 min 30 min 30 min
Service Span 4:29a-11:56p 4:56a-11:54p 5:06a-11:03p
Average Daily
Boardings in
Anaheim (Apr. 2024)
585 374 344
Source: CR Associates
Number of Stops in Anaheim (both directions): 12
Figure A.55 - OCTA Route 83 Overview Map
Source: Remix, CR Associates

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Figure A.56 - OCTA Route 83 Average Weekday Northbound Ridership Source: Remix, CR Associates

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Figure A.57 - OCTA Route 83 Average Weekday Southbound Ridership Source: Remix, CR Associates

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Table A.20 - OCTA Route 123: Anaheim to Huntington Beach

Weekday
Saturday Sunday Peak Off-Peak
Frequency 60 min 60-70 min No service No service
Service Span 4:39a-10:12p No service No service
Average Daily
Boardings in
Anaheim (Apr. 2024)
64 No service No service
Source: CR Associates
Number of Stops in Anaheim (both directions): 14
Figure A.58 - OCTA Route 123 Overview Map
Source: Remix, CR Associates

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Figure A.59 - OCTA Route 123 Average Weekday Northbound Ridership Source: Remix, CR Associates

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Figure A.60 - OCTA Route 123 Average Weekday Southbound Ridership Source: Remix, CR Associates

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Table A.21 - OCTA Route 129: La Habra to Anaheim

Weekday
Saturday Sunday Peak Off-Peak
Frequency 46 min 40-50 min 55 min 55 min
Service Span 4:54a-9:17p 6:02a-9:15p 6:54a-8:17p
Average Daily
Boardings in
Anaheim (Apr. 2024)
119 48 30
Source: CR Associates
Number of Stops in Anaheim (both directions): 8
Figure A.61 - OCTA Route 129 Overview Map
Source: Remix, CR Associates

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Figure A.62 - OCTA Route 129 Average Weekday Eastbound Ridership Source: Remix, CR Associates

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Figure A.63 - OCTA Route 129 Average Weekday Westbound Ridership Source: Remix, CR Associates

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Table A.22 - OCTA Route 529: Rapid Fullerton to Huntington Beach Weekday Saturday Sunday Peak Off-Peak
Frequency 26 min 25-30 min No service No service
Service Span 6:06a-6:59p No service No service
Average Daily
Boardings in
Anaheim (Apr. 2024)
256 No service No service
Source: CR Associates
Number of Stops in Anaheim (both directions): 4
Figure A.64 - OCTA Route 529 Overview Map
Source: Remix, CR Associates

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Figure A.65 - OCTA Route 529 Average Weekday Northbound Ridership Source: Remix, CR Associates

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Figure A.66 - OCTA Route 529 Average Weekday Southbound Ridership Source: Remix, CR Associates

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Table A.23 - OCTA Route 543: Fullerton Transportation Center to Santa Ana

Weekday
Saturday Sunday Peak Off-Peak
Frequency 22 min 20 min No service No service
Service Span 5:15a-7:21p No service No service
Average Daily
Boardings in
Anaheim (Apr. 2024)
905 No service No service
Source: CR Associates
Number of Stops in Anaheim (both directions): 11
Figure A.67 - OCTA Route 543 Overview Map
Source: Remix, CR Associates

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Figure A.68 - OCTA Route 543 Average Weekday Northbound Ridership

Source: Remix, CR Associates
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Figure A.69 - OCTA Route 543 Average Weekday Southbound Ridership Source: Remix, CR Associates
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Table A.24 - OCTA Route 553: Rapid Anaheim to Costa Mesa

Weekday
Saturday Sunday Peak Off-Peak
Frequency 22 min 20 min No service No service
Service Span 5:52a-7:51p No service No service
Average Daily
Boardings in
Anaheim (Apr. 2024)
64 No service No service
Source: CR Associates
Number of Stops in Anaheim (both directions): 2
Figure A.70 - OCTA Route 553 Overview Map
Source: Remix, CR Associates

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Figure A.71 - OCTA Route 553 Average Weekday Northbound Ridership Source: Remix, CR Associates

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Figure A.72 - OCTA Route 553 Average Weekday Southbound Ridership Source: Remix, CR Associates

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
ATN Routes
Table A.25 - ATN Route 3: Grove District
Daily
Peak Off-Peak
Frequency 20 min No Service
Service Span 6:30a-10a, 3:25p-12:30a
Average Daily
Boardings in
Anaheim
Route-level ridership is not available
Source: CR Associates
Note: During off-peak times, ATN Routes 3 and 4 operate as a combined Route 3/4. See separate Route 3/4 sheet for more information.

Number of Stops in Anaheim (both directions): 7
Figure A.73 - ATN Route 3 Alignment
Source: Remix, CR Associates
Note: Ridership at the route level is not available for all ATN routes.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Table A.26 - ATN Route 4: Harbor

Daily
Peak Off-Peak
Frequency 20 min No Service
Service Span 6:30a-10a, 3:25p-12:30a
Average Daily
Boardings in
Anaheim
Route-level ridership is not available
Source: CR Associates
Note: During off-peak times, ATN Routes 3 and 4 operate as a combined Route 3/4. See separate Route 3/4 sheet for more information.

Number of Stops in Anaheim (both directions): 6
Figure A.74 - ATN Route 4 Alignment
Source: Remix, CR Associates
Note: Ridership at the route level is not available for all ATN routes.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Table A.27 - ATN Route 3/4: Grove District/Harbor

Daily
Peak Off-Peak
Frequency No Service 20 min
Service Span 10a-3:25p
Average Daily
Boardings in
Anaheim
Route-level ridership is not available
Source: CR Associates
Note: During peak times, ATN Route 3/4 operates as separate Routes 3 and 4. See separate Route 3 and Route 4 sheets for more information.

Number of Stops in Anaheim (both directions): 13
Figure A.75 - ATN Route 3/4 Alignment
Source: Remix, CR Associates
Note: Ridership at the route level is not available for all ATN routes.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Table A.28 - ATN Route 5: Grand Plaza

Daily
Peak Off-Peak
Frequency 20 min No Service
Service Span 6:30a-10a, 3:25p-12:30a
Average Daily
Boardings in
Anaheim
Route-level ridership is not available
Source: CR Associates
Number of Stops in Anaheim (both directions): 8
Figure A.76 - ATN Route 5 Alignment
Source: Remix, CR Associates
Note: Ridership at the route level is not available for all ATN routes.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Table A.29 - ATN Route 6: Disney Way

Daily
Peak Off-Peak
Frequency 20 min No Service
Service Span 6:30a-10a, 3:20p-12:30a
Average Daily
Boardings in
Anaheim
Route-level ridership is not available
Source: CR Associates
Note: During off-peak times, ATN Routes 6 and 12 operate as a combined Route 6/12. See separate Route 6/12 sheet for more information.

Number of Stops in Anaheim (both directions): 8
Figure A.77 - ATN Route 6 Alignment
Source: Remix, CR Associates
Note: Ridership at the route level is not available for all ATN routes.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Table A.30 - ATN Route 6/12: Disney Way/Manchester

Daily
Peak Off-Peak
Frequency No Service 20 min
Service Span 10a-3:20p
Average Daily
Boardings in
Anaheim
Route-level ridership is not available
Source: CR Associates
Note: During peak times, ATN Route 6/12 operates as separate Routes 6 and 12. See separate Route 6 and Route 12 sheets for more information.

Number of Stops in Anaheim (both directions): 9
Figure A.78 - ATN Route 6/12 Alignment
Source: Remix, CR Associates
Note: Ridership at the route level is not available for all ATN routes.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Table A.31 - ATN Route 7: Clementine

Daily
Peak Off-Peak
Frequency 20 min No Service
Service Span 6:30a-10a, 3:10p-12:30a
Average Daily
Boardings in Anaheim
Route-level ridership is not
available
Source: CR Associates
Note: During off-peak times, ATN Routes 7 and 8 operate as a combined Route 7/8. See separate Route 7/8 sheet for more information.

Number of Stops in Anaheim (both directions): 6
Figure A.79 - ATN Route 7 Alignment
Source: Remix, CR Associates
Note: Ridership at the route level is not available for all ATN routes.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Table A.32 - ATN Route 8: Hotel Circle

Daily
Peak Off-Peak
Frequency 20 min No Service
Service Span 6:30a-10a, 3:10p-12:30a
Average Daily
Boardings in Anaheim
Route-level ridership is not
available
Source: CR Associates
Note: During off-peak times, ATN Routes 7 and 8 operate as a combined Route 7/8. See separate Route 7/8 sheet for more information.

Number of Stops in Anaheim (both directions): 6
Figure A.80 - ATN Route 8 Alignment
Source: Remix, CR Associates
Note: Ridership at the route level is not available for all ATN routes.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Table A.33 - ATN Route 7/8: Clementine/Hotel Circle

Daily
Peak Off-Peak
Frequency No Service 20 min
Service Span 10a-3:10p
Average Daily Boardings
in Anaheim
Route-level ridership is not
available
Source: CR Associates
Note: During peak times, ATN Route 7/8 operates as separate Routes 7 and 8. See separate Route 7 and Route 8 sheets for more information.

Number of Stops in Anaheim (both directions): 12
Figure A.81 - ATN Route 7/8 Alignment
Source: Remix, CR Associates
Note: Ridership at the route level is not available for all ATN routes.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Table A.34 - ATN Route 9: Katella

Daily
Peak Off-Peak
Frequency 20 min No Service
Service Span 6:30a-10a, 3:20p-12:30a
Average Daily Boardings
in Anaheim
Route-level ridership is not
available
Source: CR Associates
Note: During off-peak times, ATN Routes 9 and 11 operate as a combined Route 9/11. See separate Route 9/11 sheet for more information.

Number of Stops in Anaheim (both directions): 6
Figure A.82 - ATN Route 9 Alignment
Source: Remix, CR Associates
Note: Ridership at the route level is not available for all ATN routes.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Table A.35 - ATN Route 11: Ball Road

Daily
Peak Off-Peak
Frequency 20 min No Service
Service Span 6:30a-10a, 3:20p12:30a
Average Daily
Boardings in Anaheim
Route-level ridership is
not available
Source: CR Associates
Note: During off-peak times, ATN Routes 9 and 11 operate as a combined Route 9/11. See separate Route 9/11 sheet for more information.

Number of Stops in Anaheim (both directions): 9
Figure A.83 - ATN Route 11 Alignment
Source: Remix, CR Associates
Note: Ridership at the route level is not available for all ATN routes.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Table A.36 - ATN Route 9/11: Katella/Ball Road

Daily
Peak Off-Peak
Frequency No
Service 20 min
Service Span 10a-3:20p
Average Daily Boardings
in Anaheim
Route-level ridership is
not available
Source: CR Associates
Note: During peak times, ATN Route 9/11 operates as separate Routes 9 and 11. See separate Route 9 and Route 11 sheets for more information.

Number of Stops in Anaheim (both directions): 16
Figure A.84 - ATN Route 9/11 Alignment
Source: Remix, CR Associates
Note: Ridership at the route level is not available for all ATN routes.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Table A.37 - ATN Route 12: Manchester

Daily
Peak Off-Peak
Frequency 20 min No Service
Service Span 6:30a-10a, 3:20p12:30a
Average Daily Boardings
in Anaheim
Route-level ridership is
not available
Source: CR Associates
Note: During off-peak times, ATN Routes 6 and 12 operate as a combined Route 6/12. See separate Route 6/12 sheet for more information.

Number of Stops in Anaheim (both directions): 6
Figure A.85 - ATN Route 12 Alignment
Source: Remix, CR Associates
Note: Ridership at the route level is not available for all ATN routes.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Table A.38 - ATN Route 15: ARTIC Express

Daily
Peak Off-Peak
Frequency 60 min No Service
Service Span 6a-8a
Average Daily Boardings
in Anaheim
Route-level ridership is
not available
Source: CR Associates
Number of Stops in Anaheim (both directions): 2
Figure A.86 - ATN Route 15 (ARTIC Express) Alignment
Source: Remix, CR Associates
Note: Ridership at the route level is not available for all ATN routes.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Table A.39 - ATN Route 15: ARTIC Sports Complex

Daily
Peak Off-Peak
Frequency 20 min 20 min
Service Span 6:30a-12:30a
Average Daily Boardings
in Anaheim
Route-level ridership is
not available
Source: CR Associates
Number of Stops in Anaheim (both directions): 8
Figure A.87 - ATN Route 15 (ARTIC Sports Complex) Alignment Source: Remix, CR Associates
Note: Ridership at the route level is not available for all ATN routes.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Table A.40 - ATN Route 17: Canyon Metrolink to Disneyland/Disneyland Report to Canyon Metrolink

Daily
Peak Off-Peak
Frequency 60 min No Service
Service Span 6a-8a, 4p-6p
Average Daily Boardings
in Anaheim
Route-level ridership is
not available
Source: CR Associates
Number of Stops in Anaheim (both directions): 16
Figure A.88 - ATN Route 17 Alignment
Source: Remix, CR Associates
Note: Ridership at the route level is not available for all ATN routes.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
Table A.41 - ATN Route 20: Toy Story

Daily
Peak Off-Peak
Frequency 5 min 5 min
Service Span 6:30a-12:30a
Average Daily Boardings
in Anaheim
Route-level ridership is
not available
Source: CR Associates
Number of Stops in Anaheim (both directions): 2
Figure A.89 - ATN Route 20 Alignment
Source: Remix, CR Associates
Note: Ridership at the route level is not available for all ATN routes.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
LA Metro Route 460
Table A.42 - LA Metro Line 460: Downtown LA to Disneyland

Weekday
Saturday Sunday Peak Off-Peak
Frequency 25-35 min 30-60 min 30-45 min 30-45 min
Service Span 4:00a-1:53a 4:26a-1:52a 4:26a-1:55a
Average Daily
Boardings for entire
route (Apr. 2024)
4,062 3,052 2,774
Source: CR Associates
Number of Stops in Anaheim (both directions): 14
Figure A.90 - LA Metro Line 460 Overview Map
Source: Remix, CR Associates
Note: Ridership at the route level is not available for this route

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix A
RTA Route 200
Table A.43 - RTA Route 200: San Bernardino – Riverside – Anaheim

Weekday
Saturday Sunday Peak Off-Peak
Frequency 60-80 min 60-90 min 90-120 min 90-120 min
Service Span 4:05a-12:06a 6:00a-11:56p 6:00a-11:56p
Average Daily
Boardings for entire
route (Sept. 2024)
13,098 Not broken down
by day of week
Not broken down
by day of week
Source: CR Associates
Number of Stops in Anaheim (both directions): 6
Figure A.91 - RTA Route 200 Overview Map
Source: Remix, CR Associates
Note: Ridership at the route level is not available for this route

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix B
Appendix B - Anaheim Circulation Element Excerpt
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix C
Appendix C - Study Area Intersections Existing
AM and PM Peak Hour Count
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC
Tue, Oct 12, 21 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 7
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 2 4 0 2 4 0 2 3 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 25 263 26 19 343 15 47 73 32 49 61 40 993 2 5 1 1 9 7:15 AM 43 347 40 28 454 26 35 106 42 56 77 30 1,284 3 6 0 1 10 7:30 AM 32 358 42 51 450 37 54 111 27 49 110 34 1,355 0 6 0 0 6 7:45 AM 46 402 35 46 455 32 62 128 41 55 139 32 1,473 5 3 0 1 9 8:00 AM 43 338 39 48 542 28 43 132 47 48 116 28 1,452 5 5 3 0 13 8:15 AM 51 325 48 27 419 26 60 153 36 54 124 29 1,352 3 1 3 0 7 8:30 AM 37 365 36 27 422 14 48 111 42 39 73 22 1,236 2 1 2 0 5 8:45 AM 44 269 43 38 331 23 45 105 48 42 77 28 1,093 4 11 1 0 16 VOLUMES 321 2,667 309 284 3,416 201 394 919 315 392 777 243 10,238 24 38 10 3 75 APPROACH % 10% 81% 9% 7% 88% 5% 24% 56% 19% 28% 55% 17% APP/DEPART 3,297 / 3,332 3,901 / 4,144 1,628 / 1,477 1,412 / 1,285 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 172 1,423 164 172 1,866 123 219 524 151 206 489 123 5,632 APPROACH % 10% 81% 9% 8% 86% 6% 24% 59% 17% 25% 60% 15% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.910 0.874 0.898 0.905 0.956
APP/DEPART 1,759 / 1,774 2,161 / 2,235 894 / 846 818 / 777 0 4:00 PM 63 386 49 48 396 51 52 106 35 43 134 20 1,383 5 11 2 0 18 4:15 PM 43 352 54 48 317 35 67 120 61 47 146 32 1,322 5 8 2 1 16 4:30 PM 57 426 74 34 395 36 53 143 36 34 121 18 1,427 7 5 1 0 13 4:45 PM 50 362 45 57 336 45 50 121 54 62 136 36 1,354 5 12 3 1 21 5:00 PM 90 410 43 41 380 34 62 118 39 61 121 26 1,425 10 11 3 0 24 5:15 PM 51 428 54 50 405 59 69 142 62 36 105 31 1,492 10 10 3 1 24 5:30 PM 84 415 52 56 367 45 65 105 51 49 121 18 1,428 10 19 1 1 31 5:45 PM 59 396 57 57 411 51 57 125 54 58 119 24 1,468 12 9 4 0 25 VOLUMES 497 3,175 428 391 3,007 356 475 980 392 390 1,003 205 11,299 64 85 19 4 172 APPROACH % 12% 77% 10% 10% 80% 9% 26% 53% 21% 24% 63% 13% APP/DEPART 4,100 / 3,921 3,754 / 3,849 1,847 / 1,718 1,598 / 1,811 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 284 1,649 206 204 1,563 189 253 490 206 204 466 99 5,813 APPROACH % 13% 77% 10% 10% 80% 10% 27% 52% 22% 27% 61% 13% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.971 0.942 0.869 0.924 0.974
APP/DEPART 2,139 / 2,039 1,956 / 2,013 949 / 853 769 / 908 0 Beach

NORTH SIDE
Lincoln WEST SIDE EAST SIDE Lincoln

SOUTH SIDE
Beach

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
Anaheim
Beach
Lincoln

U-TURNS
Beach Beach Lincoln Lincoln
AM
7:30 AM
PM
5:00 PM
Add U-Turns to Left Turns
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
DRAFT Task 2 – State of the System Report
175
Appendix C - Study Area Intersections AM
and PM Peak Hour Counts

INSERT PDF OF COUNTS
7,655 557 6,423 675 TOTAL 7,253
3,754 356 3,007 391 PM 3,921
3,901 201 3,416 284 AM 3,332
1,412 1,598 3,010
3,096 1,811 1,285
243 205 448
777
1,003 1,780
TOTAL
PM
AM
392 390 782
869 475 394
AM
PM
TOTAL
1,899
980 919
707 392 315
1,477 1,718 3,195
3,475 1,847 1,628
4,144 AM 321 2,667 309 3,297
3,849 PM 497 3,175 428 4,100
7,993 TOTAL 818 5,842 737 7,397
4,117 312 3,429 376 TOTAL 3,813
1,956 189 1,563 204 PM 2,039
2,161 123 1,866 172 AM 1,774
818 769
1,587
1,685
908 777
123
99 222
489 466 955
TOTAL
PM
AM
AM 7:30 AM
8:45 AM
206 204 410
472 253 219
#N/A
AM
PM
TOTAL
1,014
490 524
PM 5:00 PM
5:45 PM
357 206 151
846 853
1,699
1,843
949 894
2,235 AM 172 1,423 164 1,759
2,013 PM 284 1,649 206 2,139
4,248 Total 456 3,072 370 3,898
AimTD LLC

TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
Beach
Lincoln
Lincoln
SC

ALL HOURS
Anaheim
Beach
Beach
Beach
Lincoln
Lincoln

PEAK HOUR
Appendix C
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
DRAFT Task 2 – State of the System Report
175
Appendix C - Study Area Intersections AM
and PM Peak Hour Counts

INSERT PDF OF COUNTS
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC
Tue, Oct 12, 21 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 8
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 1 4 0 1 4 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 29 270 15 24 350 48 17 48 18 37 80 23 959 8 12 0 0 20 7:15 AM 29 377 24 19 554 36 23 64 29 35 80 20 1,290 8 4 0 0 12 7:30 AM 31 386 31 29 440 28 30 94 36 31 104 29 1,269 10 9 0 0 19 7:45 AM 50 376 40 35 490 40 43 81 42 23 92 25 1,337 8 11 0 0 19 8:00 AM 51 363 33 31 552 49 24 91 34 22 114 20 1,384 10 7 0 0 17 8:15 AM 55 352 33 36 443 33 43 132 58 30 78 31 1,324 14 18 0 0 32 8:30 AM 38 360 44 33 462 23 36 84 24 31 44 20 1,199 12 20 0 0 32 8:45 AM 25 308 22 21 349 33 20 57 20 25 46 15 941 8 9 0 0 17 VOLUMES 308 2,792 242 228 3,640 290 236 651 261 234 638 183 9,703 78 90 0 0 168 APPROACH % 9% 84% 7% 5% 88% 7% 21% 57% 23% 22% 60% 17%
APP/DEPART 3,342 / 3,301 4,158 / 4,213 1,148 / 1,031 1,055 / 1,158 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 187 1,477 137 131 1,925 150 140 398 170 106 388 105 5,314 APPROACH % 10% 82% 8% 6% 87% 7% 20% 56% 24% 18% 65% 18% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.966 0.873 0.760 0.913 0.960
APP/DEPART 1,801 / 1,767 2,206 / 2,243 708 / 621 599 / 683 0 4:00 PM 31 432 46 46 339 29 39 87 33 24 47 23 1,176 9 17 0 0 26 4:15 PM 50 428 54 39 383 31 49 87 29 26 86 18 1,280 19 13 0 0 32 4:30 PM 34 465 42 36 386 35 30 78 23 26 112 27 1,294 11 6 0 0 17 4:45 PM 41 454 42 29 381 44 35 83 35 28 90 19 1,281 12 4 0 0 16 5:00 PM 42 492 34 42 440 25 42 68 26 29 68 15 1,323 12 12 0 0 24 5:15 PM 35 441 35 35 415 29 54 106 35 39 85 22 1,331 13 10 0 0 23 5:30 PM 41 506 38 46 442 36 42 73 25 19 68 27 1,363 12 10 0 0 22 5:45 PM 27 428 42 28 404 52 40 93 26 29 80 18 1,267 8 8 0 0 16 VOLUMES 301 3,646 333 301 3,190 281 331 675 232 220 636 169 10,315 96 80 0 0 176 APPROACH % 7% 85% 8% 8% 85% 7% 27% 55% 19% 21% 62% 16%
APP/DEPART 4,280 / 4,226 3,772 / 3,738 1,238 / 1,229 1,025 / 1,122 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 159 1,893 149 152 1,678 134 173 330 121 115 311 83 5,298 APPROACH % 7% 86% 7% 8% 85% 7% 28% 53% 19% 23% 61% 16%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.941 0.937 0.800 0.872 0.972
APP/DEPART 2,201 / 2,185 1,964 / 1,963 624 / 595 509 / 555 0 Beach

NORTH SIDE
Orange WEST SIDE EAST SIDE Orange

SOUTH SIDE
Beach

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
Anaheim
Beach
Orange

U-TURNS
Beach Beach Orange Orange
AM
7:30 AM
PM
4:45 PM
Add U-Turns to Left Turns
Appendix C
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
DRAFT Task 2 – State of the System Report
175
Appendix C - Study Area Intersections AM
and PM Peak Hour Counts

INSERT PDF OF COUNTS
7,930 571 6,830 529 TOTAL 7,527
3,772 281 3,190 301 PM 4,226
4,158 290 3,640 228 AM 3,301
1,055 1,025 2,080
2,280 1,122 1,158
183 169 352
638 636
1,274
TOTAL
PM
AM
234 220 454
567 331 236
AM
PM
TOTAL
1,326
675 651
493 232 261
1,031 1,229 2,260
2,386 1,238 1,148
4,213 AM 308 2,792 242 3,342
3,738 PM 301 3,646 333 4,280
7,951 TOTAL 609 6,438 575 7,622
4,170 284 3,603 283 TOTAL 3,952
1,964 134 1,678 152 PM 2,185
2,206 150 1,925 131 AM 1,767
599 509
1,108
1,238
555 683
105
83 188
388 311 699
TOTAL
PM
AM
AM 7:30 AM
8:45 AM
106 115 221
313 173 140
#N/A
AM
PM
TOTAL
728 330 398
PM 4:45 PM
5:45 PM
291 121 170
621 595
1,216
1,332
624 708
2,243 AM 187 1,477 137 1,801
1,963 PM 159 1,893 149 2,201
4,206 Total 346 3,370 286 4,002
AimTD LLC

TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
Beach
Orange
Orange
SC

ALL HOURS
Anaheim
Beach
Beach
Beach
Orange
Orange

PEAK HOUR
Appendix C
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
DRAFT Task 2 – State of the System Report
175
Appendix C - Study Area Intersections AM
and PM Peak Hour Counts

INSERT PDF OF COUNTS
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC
Tue, Oct 12, 21 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 9
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 2 4 0 2 4 0 1 3 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 22 261 19 20 369 41 40 99 50 41 83 21 1,066 2 4 0 0 6 7:15 AM 27 294 12 26 512 44 41 134 56 61 154 22 1,383 4 7 1 1 13 7:30 AM 34 389 40 22 492 49 47 140 48 39 142 38 1,480 1 2 0 0 3 7:45 AM 39 346 27 33 445 53 49 167 51 63 179 31 1,483 6 6 0 1 13 8:00 AM 45 351 25 39 576 54 38 149 49 39 140 29 1,534 5 7 0 0 12 8:15 AM 44 340 21 37 466 35 50 184 57 58 159 21 1,472 9 10 0 0 19 8:30 AM 31 340 18 48 469 30 40 126 54 60 100 22 1,338 7 14 0 0 21 8:45 AM 35 314 42 26 350 34 36 95 49 43 88 23 1,135 15 4 0 0 19 VOLUMES 277 2,635 204 251 3,679 340 341 1,094 414 404 1,045 207 10,891 49 54 1 2 106 APPROACH % 9% 85% 7% 6% 86% 8% 18% 59% 22% 24% 63% 13%
APP/DEPART 3,116 / 3,236 4,270 / 4,544 1,849 / 1,497 1,656 / 1,614 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 162 1,426 113 131 1,979 191 184 640 205 199 620 119 5,969 APPROACH % 10% 84% 7% 6% 86% 8% 18% 62% 20% 21% 66% 13% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.918 0.860 0.884 0.859 0.973
APP/DEPART 1,701 / 1,754 2,301 / 2,403 1,029 / 860 938 / 952 0 4:00 PM 58 404 43 69 390 43 38 138 43 46 126 31 1,429 17 18 1 0 36 4:15 PM 49 405 57 44 349 42 55 124 52 46 163 39 1,425 15 14 1 0 30 4:30 PM 55 441 48 68 368 46 46 126 37 52 141 40 1,468 15 9 0 1 25 4:45 PM 58 444 50 57 351 40 61 168 30 39 123 50 1,471 15 10 0 1 26 5:00 PM 46 426 47 58 393 43 36 124 25 49 128 46 1,421 6 11 2 2 21 5:15 PM 56 494 57 57 411 53 48 156 32 53 133 31 1,581 7 11 1 0 19 5:30 PM 40 437 40 61 377 50 60 168 36 50 163 34 1,516 8 15 1 0 24 5:45 PM 55 464 45 55 419 39 49 122 31 43 143 32 1,497 14 13 0 0 27 VOLUMES 417 3,515 387 469 3,058 356 393 1,126 286 378 1,120 303 11,808 97 101 6 4 208 APPROACH % 10% 81% 9% 12% 79% 9% 22% 62% 16% 21% 62% 17% APP/DEPART 4,319 / 4,306 3,883 / 3,815 1,805 / 1,885 1,801 / 1,802 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 197 1,821 189 231 1,600 185 193 570 124 195 567 143 6,015 APPROACH % 9% 83% 9% 11% 79% 9% 22% 64% 14% 22% 63% 16% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.909 0.967 0.840 0.916 0.951
APP/DEPART 2,207 / 2,203 2,016 / 1,952 887 / 942 905 / 918 0 Beach

NORTH SIDE
Ball WEST SIDE EAST SIDE Ball

SOUTH SIDE
Beach

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
Anaheim
Beach
Ball

U-TURNS
Beach Beach Ball Ball
AM
7:30 AM
PM
5:00 PM
Add U-Turns to Left Turns
Appendix C
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
DRAFT Task 2 – State of the System Report
175
Appendix C - Study Area Intersections AM
and PM Peak Hour Counts

INSERT PDF OF COUNTS
8,153 696 6,737 720 TOTAL 7,542
3,883 356 3,058 469 PM 4,306
4,270 340 3,679 251 AM 3,236
1,656 1,801 3,457
3,416 1,802 1,614
207 303 510
1,045 1,120 2,165
TOTAL
PM
AM
404 378 782
734 393 341
AM
PM
TOTAL
2,220 1,126 1,094
700 286 414
1,497 1,885 3,382
3,654 1,805 1,849
4,544 AM 277 2,635 204 3,116
3,815 PM 417 3,515 387 4,319
8,359 TOTAL 694 6,150 591 7,435
4,317 376 3,579 362 TOTAL 3,957
2,016 185 1,600 231 PM 2,203
2,301 191 1,979 131 AM 1,754
938 905
1,843
1,870
918 952
119 143 262
620 567
1,187
TOTAL
PM
AM
AM 7:30 AM
8:45 AM
199 195 394
377 193 184
#N/A
AM
PM
TOTAL
1,210
570 640
PM 5:00 PM
5:45 PM
329 124 205
860 942
1,802
1,916
887
1,029
2,403 AM 162 1,426 113 1,701
1,952 PM 197 1,821 189 2,207
4,355 Total 359 3,247 302 3,908
AimTD LLC

TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
Beach
Ball
Ball
SC

ALL HOURS
Anaheim
Beach
Beach
Beach
Ball
Ball

PEAK HOUR
Appendix C
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
DRAFT Task 2 – State of the System Report
175
Appendix C - Study Area Intersections AM
and PM Peak Hour Counts

INSERT PDF OF COUNTS
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC
Wed, Nov 3, 21 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 32
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 23 178 48 26 301 45 48 97 30 47 61 9 913 0 3 0 0 3 7:15 AM 62 204 35 29 252 50 65 134 38 49 70 13 1,001 0 2 0 0 2 7:30 AM 73 275 64 50 310 80 82 148 50 33 95 24 1,284 2 5 0 0 7 7:45 AM 60 278 104 53 265 116 76 205 52 44 113 14 1,380 0 1 0 2 3 8:00 AM 72 283 120 35 274 77 56 188 68 55 88 9 1,325 1 2 0 0 3 8:15 AM 35 200 89 46 285 64 69 169 54 67 103 26 1,207 0 7 0 1 8 8:30 AM 44 217 57 36 224 54 55 132 40 56 93 15 1,023 0 8 0 0 8 8:45 AM 37 236 84 24 263 88 65 146 45 65 86 7 1,146 0 3 0 0 3 VOLUMES 406 1,871 601 299 2,174 574 516 1,219 377 416 709 117 9,279 3 31 0 3 37 APPROACH % 14% 65% 21% 10% 71% 19% 24% 58% 18% 33% 57% 9% APP/DEPART 2,878 / 2,535 3,047 / 2,967 2,112 / 2,091 1,242 / 1,686 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 240 1,036 377 184 1,134 337 283 710 224 199 399 73 5,196 APPROACH % 15% 63% 23% 11% 69% 20% 23% 58% 18% 30% 59% 11% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.870 0.940 0.914 0.856 0.941
APP/DEPART 1,653 / 1,407 1,655 / 1,557 1,217 / 1,259 671 / 973 0 4:00 PM 43 293 77 29 241 68 57 131 44 46 115 26 1,170 0 1 0 0 1 4:15 PM 65 326 80 30 323 83 71 125 46 50 103 21 1,323 0 8 2 0 10 4:30 PM 66 250 81 27 321 78 55 147 31 69 158 37 1,320 2 2 0 0 4 4:45 PM 57 303 71 22 314 85 60 102 23 51 141 31 1,260 0 7 0 0 7 5:00 PM 47 276 78 34 265 88 95 169 50 70 154 35 1,361 0 8 0 0 8 5:15 PM 66 329 68 36 291 99 56 108 34 77 143 22 1,329 1 6 0 0 7 5:30 PM 49 318 73 47 263 79 90 148 50 64 135 28 1,344 0 12 0 0 12 5:45 PM 76 297 92 23 244 69 51 99 38 69 133 28 1,219 0 4 0 0 4 VOLUMES 469 2,392 620 248 2,262 649 535 1,029 316 496 1,082 228 10,326 3 48 2 0 53 APPROACH % 13% 69% 18% 8% 72% 21% 28% 55% 17% 27% 60% 13% APP/DEPART 3,481 / 3,201 3,159 / 3,077 1,880 / 1,849 1,806 / 2,199 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 219 1,226 290 139 1,133 351 301 527 157 262 573 116 5,294 APPROACH % 13% 71% 17% 9% 70% 22% 31% 54% 16% 28% 60% 12% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.937 0.952 0.784 0.918 0.972
APP/DEPART 1,735 / 1,676 1,623 / 1,553 985 / 923 951 / 1,142 0 Brookhurst

NORTH SIDE
La Palma WEST SIDE EAST SIDE La Palma

SOUTH SIDE
Brookhurst

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
Anaheim
Brookhurst
La Palma

U-TURNS
Brookhurst
Queue NB/SB AM/PM
Brookhurst La Palma La Palma
AM
7:30 AM
PM
4:45 PM
Add U-Turns to Left Turns
Appendix C
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
DRAFT Task 2 – State of the System Report
175
Appendix C - Study Area Intersections AM
and PM Peak Hour Counts

INSERT PDF OF COUNTS
6,206 1,223 4,436 547 TOTAL 5,736
3,159 649 2,262 248 PM 3,201
3,047 574 2,174 299 AM 2,535
1,242 1,806 3,048
3,885 2,199 1,686
117 228 345
709
1,082 1,791
TOTAL
PM
AM
416 496 912
1,051
535 516
AM
PM
TOTAL
2,248 1,029 1,219
693 316 377
2,091 1,849 3,940
3,992 1,880 2,112
2,967 AM 406 1,871 601 2,878
3,077 PM 469 2,392 620 3,481
6,044 TOTAL 875 4,263 1,221 6,359
3,278 688 2,267 323 TOTAL 3,083
1,623 351 1,133 139 PM 1,676
1,655 337 1,134 184 AM 1,407
671 951
1,622
2,115 1,142
973
73 116 189
399 573 972
TOTAL
PM
AM
AM 7:30 AM
8:45 AM
199 262 461
584 301 283
#N/A
AM
PM
TOTAL
1,237
527 710
PM 4:45 PM
5:45 PM
381 157 224
1,259
923
2,182
2,202
985
1,217
1,557 AM 240 1,036 377 1,653
1,553 PM 219 1,226 290 1,735
3,110 Total 459 2,262 667 3,388
AimTD LLC

TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
Brookhurst
La Palma
La Palma
SC

ALL HOURS
Anaheim
Brookhurst
Brookhurst
Brookhurst
La Palma
La Palma

PEAK HOUR
Appendix C
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
DRAFT Task 2 – State of the System Report
175
Appendix C - Study Area Intersections AM
and PM Peak Hour Counts

INSERT PDF OF COUNTS
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC
Tue, Oct 19, 21 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 35
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 2 3 1 2 3 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 11 177 32 31 161 28 38 87 27 32 63 25 712 1 0 0 11 12 7:15 AM 25 300 27 29 224 40 33 150 29 31 63 28 979 1 1 2 7 11 7:30 AM 27 301 35 45 217 46 44 186 49 28 87 42 1,107 0 1 0 3 4 7:45 AM 36 243 32 61 228 41 32 200 40 42 124 37 1,116 2 0 0 11 13 8:00 AM 20 252 53 43 205 59 48 201 41 37 102 36 1,097 1 0 5 6 12 8:15 AM 23 201 48 71 219 52 33 213 36 33 117 36 1,082 1 0 3 3 7 8:30 AM 29 248 40 80 258 33 33 186 28 34 71 29 1,069 2 0 4 5 11 8:45 AM 9 195 44 67 207 18 43 165 29 40 83 35 935 0 0 0 8 8 VOLUMES 180 1,917 311 427 1,719 317 304 1,388 279 277 710 268 8,097 8 2 14 54 78 APPROACH % 7% 80% 13% 17% 70% 13% 15% 70% 14% 22% 57% 21% APP/DEPART 2,408 / 2,477 2,463 / 2,229 1,971 / 2,178 1,255 / 1,213 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 106 997 168 220 869 198 157 800 166 140 430 151 4,402 APPROACH % 8% 78% 13% 17% 68% 15% 14% 71% 15% 19% 60% 21% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.875 0.941 0.968 0.888 0.986
APP/DEPART 1,271 / 1,298 1,287 / 1,156 1,123 / 1,210 721 / 738 0 4:00 PM 42 260 49 42 332 51 49 132 38 45 139 39 1,218 0 0 3 9 12 4:15 PM 31 248 54 44 284 39 43 140 32 63 140 41 1,159 1 0 3 11 15 4:30 PM 25 268 43 37 327 48 32 121 41 48 133 50 1,173 3 3 1 8 15 4:45 PM 41 261 53 38 339 48 40 132 36 63 140 34 1,225 1 2 1 5 9 5:00 PM 38 283 51 44 302 42 38 150 38 47 166 44 1,243 1 1 4 9 15 5:15 PM 45 311 48 26 358 58 33 111 34 48 140 43 1,255 2 0 6 7 15 5:30 PM 27 260 53 23 321 43 40 152 32 53 155 45 1,204 0 1 4 6 11 5:45 PM 34 269 43 37 366 62 30 120 38 45 132 49 1,225 2 2 1 6 11 VOLUMES 283 2,160 394 291 2,629 391 305 1,058 289 412 1,145 345 9,702 10 9 23 61 103 APPROACH % 10% 76% 14% 9% 79% 12% 18% 64% 17% 22% 60% 18% APP/DEPART 2,837 / 2,796 3,311 / 3,279 1,652 / 1,795 1,902 / 1,832 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 144 1,123 195 130 1,347 205 141 533 142 193 593 181 4,927 APPROACH % 10% 77% 13% 8% 80% 12% 17% 65% 17% 20% 61% 19% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.905 0.904 0.903 0.941 0.981
APP/DEPART 1,462 / 1,434 1,682 / 1,659 816 / 882 967 / 952 0 Brookhurst

NORTH SIDE
Lincoln WEST SIDE EAST SIDE Lincoln

SOUTH SIDE
Brookhurst
AM
7:30 AM
PM
5:00 PM

U-TURNS
Brookhurst Brookhurst Lincoln Lincoln

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
Anaheim
Brookhurst
Lincoln
Add U-Turns to Left Turns
Appendix C
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
DRAFT Task 2 – State of the System Report
175
Appendix C - Study Area Intersections AM
and PM Peak Hour Counts

INSERT PDF OF COUNTS
5,774 708 4,348 718 TOTAL 5,273
3,311 391 2,629 291 PM 2,796
2,463 317 1,719 427 AM 2,477
1,255 1,902 3,157
3,045 1,832 1,213
268 345 613
710
1,145 1,855
TOTAL
PM
AM
277 412 689
609 305 304
AM
PM
TOTAL
2,446 1,058 1,388
568 289 279
2,178 1,795 3,973
3,623 1,652 1,971
2,229 AM 180 1,917 311 2,408
3,279 PM 283 2,160 394 2,837
5,508 TOTAL 463 4,077 705 5,245
2,969 403 2,216 350 TOTAL 2,732
1,682 205 1,347 130 PM 1,434
1,287 198 869 220 AM 1,298
721 967
1,688
1,690
952 738
151 181 332
430 593
1,023
TOTAL
PM
AM
AM 7:30 AM
8:45 AM
140 193 333
298 141 157
#N/A
AM
PM
TOTAL
1,333
533 800
PM 5:00 PM
5:45 PM
308 142 166
1,210
882
2,092
1,939
816
1,123
1,156 AM 106 997 168 1,271
1,659 PM 144 1,123 195 1,462
2,815 Total 250 2,120 363 2,733
Brookhurst
Brookhurst
Brookhurst
Lincoln
Lincoln

PEAK HOUR
AimTD LLC

TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
Brookhurst
Lincoln
Lincoln
SC

ALL HOURS
Anaheim
Appendix C
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
DRAFT Task 2 – State of the System Report
175
Appendix C - Study Area Intersections AM
and PM Peak Hour Counts

INSERT PDF OF COUNTS
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC
Tue, Oct 19, 21 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 38
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 35 139 12 34 170 18 37 174 25 15 80 22 761 6 0 0 0 6 7:15 AM 13 136 18 32 203 24 41 185 31 36 162 49 930 2 0 0 0 2 7:30 AM 42 206 15 38 239 25 52 194 56 28 159 35 1,089 4 0 0 0 4 7:45 AM 41 181 20 49 272 28 44 176 44 31 189 39 1,114 6 2 0 1 9 8:00 AM 34 176 18 50 215 35 51 183 35 35 163 44 1,039 3 1 0 0 4 8:15 AM 27 165 24 68 227 49 47 177 33 28 115 40 1,000 5 1 0 2 8 8:30 AM 38 163 17 51 185 26 52 206 25 34 113 26 936 3 0 0 0 3 8:45 AM 28 162 15 45 214 36 37 152 33 28 92 19 861 9 1 1 0 11 VOLUMES 258 1,328 139 367 1,725 241 361 1,447 282 235 1,073 274 7,730 38 5 1 3 47 APPROACH % 15% 77% 8% 16% 74% 10% 17% 69% 13% 15% 68% 17% APP/DEPART 1,725 / 1,967 2,333 / 2,277 2,090 / 1,951 1,582 / 1,535 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 144 728 77 205 953 137 194 730 168 122 626 158 4,242 APPROACH % 15% 77% 8% 16% 74% 11% 18% 67% 15% 13% 69% 17% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.902 0.928 0.904 0.875 0.952
APP/DEPART 949 / 1,084 1,295 / 1,258 1,092 / 1,011 906 / 889 0 4:00 PM 34 219 33 46 235 57 47 186 28 38 175 50 1,148 8 1 0 0 9 4:15 PM 55 286 32 42 252 71 53 145 27 20 169 46 1,198 6 0 1 0 7 4:30 PM 48 243 22 42 231 51 44 170 32 34 200 40 1,157 5 3 0 0 8 4:45 PM 45 287 26 50 273 54 48 176 23 28 189 43 1,242 5 0 0 1 6 5:00 PM 48 248 31 53 264 52 51 129 38 39 181 52 1,186 9 6 1 0 16 5:15 PM 62 256 25 56 237 60 58 188 32 32 190 37 1,233 6 1 0 0 7 5:30 PM 42 275 33 54 301 52 44 146 31 39 162 36 1,215 5 1 0 2 8 5:45 PM 42 263 33 39 214 43 59 151 28 34 196 43 1,145 1 5 1 0 7 VOLUMES 376 2,077 235 382 2,007 440 404 1,291 239 264 1,462 347 9,524 45 17 3 3 68 APPROACH % 14% 77% 9% 14% 71% 16% 21% 67% 12% 13% 71% 17% APP/DEPART 2,688 / 2,842 2,829 / 2,552 1,934 / 1,894 2,073 / 2,236 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 197 1,066 115 213 1,075 218 201 639 124 138 722 168 4,876 APPROACH % 14% 77% 8% 14% 71% 14% 21% 66% 13% 13% 70% 16% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.962 0.925 0.867 0.945 0.981
APP/DEPART 1,378 / 1,442 1,506 / 1,359 964 / 962 1,028 / 1,113 0 Brookhurst

NORTH SIDE
Ball WEST SIDE EAST SIDE Ball

SOUTH SIDE
Brookhurst

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
Anaheim
Brookhurst
Ball

U-TURNS
Brookhurst Brookhurst Ball Ball
AM
7:30 AM
PM
4:45 PM
Add U-Turns to Left Turns
Appendix C
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
DRAFT Task 2 – State of the System Report
175
Appendix C - Study Area Intersections AM
and PM Peak Hour Counts

INSERT PDF OF COUNTS
5,162 681 3,732 749 TOTAL 4,809
2,829 440 2,007 382 PM 2,842
2,333 241 1,725 367 AM 1,967
1,582 2,073 3,655
3,771 2,236 1,535
274 347 621
1,073 1,462 2,535
TOTAL
PM
AM
235 264 499
765 404 361
AM
PM
TOTAL
2,738 1,291 1,447
521 239 282
1,951 1,894 3,845
4,024 1,934 2,090
2,277 AM 258 1,328 139 1,725
2,552 PM 376 2,077 235 2,688
4,829 TOTAL 634 3,405 374 4,413
2,801 355 2,028 418 TOTAL 2,526
1,506 218 1,075 213 PM 1,442
1,295 137 953 205 AM 1,084
906
1,028 1,934
2,002 1,113
889
158 168 326
626 722
1,348
TOTAL
PM
AM
AM 7:30 AM
8:45 AM
122 138 260
395 201 194
#N/A
AM
PM
TOTAL
1,369
639 730
PM 4:45 PM
5:45 PM
292 124 168
1,011
962
1,973
2,056
964
1,092
1,258 AM 144 728 77 949
1,359 PM 197 1,066 115 1,378
2,617 Total 341 1,794 192 2,327
AimTD LLC

TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
Brookhurst
Ball
Ball
SC

ALL HOURS
Anaheim
Brookhurst
Brookhurst
Brookhurst
Ball
Ball

PEAK HOUR
Appendix C
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
DRAFT Task 2 – State of the System Report
175
Appendix C - Study Area Intersections AM
and PM Peak Hour Counts

INSERT PDF OF COUNTS
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC
Thu, Oct 21, 21 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 40
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 21 103 21 30 212 14 29 113 26 16 71 24 680 1 1 4 4 10 7:15 AM 28 120 20 45 244 24 28 157 34 40 99 30 869 2 6 5 3 16 7:30 AM 33 135 19 51 304 27 33 213 52 30 112 22 1,031 3 4 7 3 17 7:45 AM 44 182 27 50 302 24 42 210 69 46 123 28 1,147 0 4 6 3 13 8:00 AM 37 177 27 43 267 29 36 165 52 36 103 31 1,003 1 4 7 0 12 8:15 AM 26 136 32 48 225 27 39 185 43 32 101 32 926 2 4 5 2 13 8:30 AM 28 142 27 49 233 23 35 173 47 40 88 33 918 1 4 4 2 11 8:45 AM 42 139 29 34 221 24 38 128 31 24 90 31 831 1 5 8 1 15 VOLUMES 259 1,134 202 350 2,008 192 280 1,344 354 264 787 231 7,405 11 32 46 18 107 APPROACH % 16% 71% 13% 14% 79% 8% 14% 68% 18% 21% 61% 18% APP/DEPART 1,595 / 1,631 2,550 / 2,619 1,978 / 1,882 1,282 / 1,273 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 140 630 105 192 1,098 107 150 773 216 144 439 113 4,107 APPROACH % 16% 72% 12% 14% 79% 8% 13% 68% 19% 21% 63% 16% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.865 0.914 0.887 0.883 0.895
APP/DEPART 875 / 884 1,397 / 1,456 1,139 / 1,062 696 / 705 0 4:00 PM 50 247 36 41 236 38 83 162 49 49 128 34 1,153 4 7 22 0 33 4:15 PM 31 243 28 52 209 27 63 250 42 45 164 28 1,182 1 12 16 1 30 4:30 PM 43 283 37 33 248 37 79 219 51 34 185 46 1,295 1 3 22 0 26 4:45 PM 42 243 31 36 238 27 86 247 44 52 190 50 1,286 2 5 23 1 31 5:00 PM 57 322 66 37 279 25 78 190 50 42 160 49 1,355 5 7 11 1 24 5:15 PM 51 217 21 39 207 43 77 208 47 54 226 46 1,236 2 9 12 1 24 5:30 PM 50 292 29 47 264 43 70 142 55 42 169 40 1,243 3 9 20 2 34 5:45 PM 68 270 36 44 213 38 86 209 55 55 176 48 1,298 0 7 20 1 28 VOLUMES 392 2,117 284 329 1,894 278 622 1,627 393 373 1,398 341 10,048 18 59 146 7 230 APPROACH % 14% 76% 10% 13% 76% 11% 24% 62% 15% 18% 66% 16% APP/DEPART 2,793 / 2,993 2,501 / 2,671 2,642 / 2,188 2,112 / 2,196 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 193 1,065 155 145 972 132 320 864 192 182 761 191 5,172 APPROACH % 14% 75% 11% 12% 78% 11% 23% 63% 14% 16% 67% 17% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.794 0.916 0.912 0.870 0.954
APP/DEPART 1,413 / 1,532 1,249 / 1,353 1,376 / 1,143 1,134 / 1,144 0 Brookhurst

NORTH SIDE
Katella WEST SIDE EAST SIDE Katella

SOUTH SIDE
Brookhurst

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
Anaheim
Brookhurst
Katella

U-TURNS
Brookhurst Brookhurst Katella Katella
AM
7:30 AM
PM
4:30 PM
Add U-Turns to Left Turns
Appendix C
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
DRAFT Task 2 – State of the System Report
175
Appendix C - Study Area Intersections AM
and PM Peak Hour Counts

INSERT PDF OF COUNTS
5,051 470 3,902 679 TOTAL 4,624
2,501 278 1,894 329 PM 2,993
2,550 192 2,008 350 AM 1,631
1,282 2,112 3,394
3,469 2,196 1,273
231 341 572
787
1,398 2,185
TOTAL
PM
AM
264 373 637
902 622 280
AM
PM
TOTAL
2,971 1,627 1,344
747 393 354
1,882 2,188 4,070
4,620 2,642 1,978
2,619 AM 259 1,134 202 1,595
2,671 PM 392 2,117 284 2,793
5,290 TOTAL 651 3,251 486 4,388
2,646 239 2,070 337 TOTAL 2,416
1,249 132 972 145 PM 1,532
1,397 107 1,098 192 AM 884
696
1,134 1,830
1,849 1,144
705
113 191 304
439 761
1,200
TOTAL
PM
AM
AM 7:30 AM
8:45 AM
144 182 326
470 320 150
#N/A
AM
PM
TOTAL
1,637
864 773
PM 4:30 PM
5:45 PM
408 192 216
1,062 1,143 2,205
2,515 1,376 1,139
1,456 AM 140 630 105 875
1,353 PM 193 1,065 155 1,413
2,809 Total 333 1,695 260 2,288
AimTD LLC

TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
Brookhurst
Katella
Katella
SC

ALL HOURS
Anaheim
Brookhurst
Brookhurst
Brookhurst
Katella
Katella

PEAK HOUR
Appendix C
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
DRAFT Task 2 – State of the System Report
175
Appendix C - Study Area Intersections AM
and PM Peak Hour Counts

INSERT PDF OF COUNTS
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC
Tue, Oct 19, 21 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 52
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 2 3 0 2 3 1 2 3 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 22 155 18 10 137 61 39 166 26 15 50 16 715 0 2 1 1 4 7:15 AM 13 236 28 46 209 78 59 185 26 23 74 16 993 0 12 6 2 20 7:30 AM 21 229 32 40 166 82 58 268 31 27 86 11 1,051 0 8 4 0 12 7:45 AM 32 278 27 53 213 115 57 228 47 20 92 24 1,186 1 2 2 1 6 8:00 AM 39 235 37 33 177 107 69 266 40 31 107 25 1,166 0 0 2 1 3 8:15 AM 26 260 36 29 198 79 83 245 51 29 79 30 1,145 0 1 2 0 3 8:30 AM 42 253 45 33 158 71 93 264 56 28 103 20 1,166 1 3 2 3 9 8:45 AM 49 273 26 40 210 80 81 196 31 26 62 20 1,094 1 3 5 4 13 VOLUMES 244 1,919 249 284 1,468 673 539 1,818 308 199 653 162 8,516 3 31 24 12 70 APPROACH % 10% 80% 10% 12% 61% 28% 20% 68% 12% 20% 64% 16% APP/DEPART 2,412 / 2,627 2,425 / 1,966 2,665 / 2,332 1,014 / 1,591 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 139 1,026 145 148 746 372 302 1,003 194 108 381 99 4,663 APPROACH % 11% 78% 11% 12% 59% 29% 20% 67% 13% 18% 65% 17% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.963 0.831 0.907 0.902 0.983
APP/DEPART 1,310 / 1,425 1,266 / 1,045 1,499 / 1,295 588 / 898 0 4:00 PM 38 263 45 33 313 91 93 189 46 46 132 28 1,317 3 3 7 2 15 4:15 PM 55 270 32 35 332 98 70 157 55 54 96 27 1,281 3 1 9 4 17 4:30 PM 39 263 37 31 298 99 112 169 50 47 144 38 1,327 1 4 10 0 15 4:45 PM 45 264 46 31 312 129 81 155 56 45 135 25 1,324 3 0 11 4 18 5:00 PM 52 238 48 23 341 109 106 168 47 48 121 25 1,326 2 1 10 2 15 5:15 PM 48 270 30 24 337 127 94 158 47 38 122 24 1,319 0 5 12 4 21 5:30 PM 37 249 34 20 313 105 109 155 42 64 122 26 1,276 0 4 6 1 11 5:45 PM 62 278 34 16 329 125 89 122 58 45 122 25 1,305 3 2 13 6 24 VOLUMES 376 2,095 306 213 2,575 883 754 1,273 401 387 994 218 10,475 15 20 78 23 136 APPROACH % 14% 75% 11% 6% 70% 24% 31% 52% 17% 24% 62% 14% APP/DEPART 2,777 / 3,009 3,671 / 3,355 2,428 / 1,795 1,599 / 2,316 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 184 1,035 161 109 1,288 464 393 650 200 178 522 112 5,296 APPROACH % 13% 75% 12% 6% 69% 25% 32% 52% 16% 22% 64% 14% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.972 0.953 0.939 0.886 0.998
APP/DEPART 1,380 / 1,507 1,861 / 1,662 1,243 / 920 812 / 1,207 0 Euclid

NORTH SIDE
Lincoln WEST SIDE EAST SIDE Lincoln

SOUTH SIDE
Euclid
AM
7:45 AM
PM
4:30 PM

U-TURNS
Euclid Euclid Lincoln Lincoln

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
Anaheim
Euclid
Lincoln
Add U-Turns to Left Turns
Appendix C
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
DRAFT Task 2 – State of the System Report
175
Appendix C - Study Area Intersections AM
and PM Peak Hour Counts

INSERT PDF OF COUNTS
6,096 1,556 4,043 497 TOTAL 5,636
3,671 883 2,575 213 PM 3,009
2,425 673 1,468 284 AM 2,627
1,014 1,599 2,613
3,907 2,316 1,591
162 218 380
653 994
1,647
TOTAL
PM
AM
199 387 586
1,293
754 539
AM
PM
TOTAL
3,091 1,273 1,818
709 401 308
2,332 1,795 4,127
5,093 2,428 2,665
1,966 AM 244 1,919 249 2,412
3,355 PM 376 2,095 306 2,777
5,321 TOTAL 620 4,014 555 5,189
3,127 836 2,034 257 TOTAL 2,932
1,861 464 1,288 109 PM 1,507
1,266 372 746 148 AM 1,425
588 812
1,400
2,105 1,207
898
99 112 211
381 522 903
TOTAL
PM
AM
AM 7:45 AM
8:45 AM
108 178 286
695 393 302
#N/A
AM
PM
TOTAL
1,653
650
1,003
PM 4:30 PM
5:45 PM
394 200 194
1,295
920
2,215
2,742 1,243 1,499
1,045 AM 139 1,026 145 1,310
1,662 PM 184 1,035 161 1,380
2,707 Total 323 2,061 306 2,690
Euclid
Euclid
Euclid
Lincoln
Lincoln

PEAK HOUR
AimTD LLC

TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
Euclid
Lincoln
Lincoln
SC

ALL HOURS
Anaheim
Appendix C
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
DRAFT Task 2 – State of the System Report
175
Appendix C - Study Area Intersections AM
and PM Peak Hour Counts

INSERT PDF OF COUNTS
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC
Tue, Oct 19, 21 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 55
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 2 3 0 2 3 0 2 2 1 2 2 1 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 20 136 23 17 136 31 23 181 36 42 87 18 750 3 1 1 1 6 7:15 AM 28 187 50 35 194 36 27 197 31 43 130 17 975 3 3 1 3 10 7:30 AM 35 193 70 39 189 44 42 207 33 51 126 17 1,046 4 4 0 3 11 7:45 AM 36 194 70 55 208 60 62 199 35 57 173 27 1,176 1 5 2 1 9 8:00 AM 42 237 43 29 170 55 56 167 29 67 136 27 1,058 5 6 3 4 18 8:15 AM 52 188 32 39 196 45 72 193 36 57 101 14 1,025 6 5 4 0 15 8:30 AM 37 218 32 36 177 47 82 177 29 36 94 13 978 6 5 3 1 15 8:45 AM 30 189 21 40 183 44 53 159 32 32 93 12 888 5 5 3 2 15 VOLUMES 280 1,542 341 290 1,453 362 417 1,480 261 385 940 145 7,896 33 34 17 15 99 APPROACH % 13% 71% 16% 14% 69% 17% 19% 69% 12% 26% 64% 10% APP/DEPART 2,163 / 2,121 2,105 / 2,117 2,158 / 2,092 1,470 / 1,566 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 165 812 215 162 763 204 232 766 133 232 536 85 4,305 APPROACH % 14% 68% 18% 14% 68% 18% 21% 68% 12% 27% 63% 10% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.925 0.874 0.939 0.830 0.915
APP/DEPART 1,192 / 1,140 1,129 / 1,136 1,131 / 1,131 853 / 898 0 4:00 PM 53 250 47 51 249 69 75 134 21 54 159 16 1,178 7 11 7 4 29 4:15 PM 51 226 38 72 235 33 54 145 39 59 185 41 1,178 8 21 11 5 45 4:30 PM 64 289 41 52 251 34 63 144 23 47 186 31 1,225 7 13 11 1 32 4:45 PM 57 246 33 60 251 41 48 131 27 66 209 28 1,197 4 7 8 3 22 5:00 PM 54 279 41 43 264 43 58 126 27 69 175 32 1,211 5 5 9 10 29 5:15 PM 61 227 30 40 261 27 37 138 32 62 185 28 1,128 11 4 6 4 25 5:30 PM 68 283 48 45 291 47 68 119 37 48 165 26 1,245 7 10 14 5 36 5:45 PM 62 259 38 39 236 49 49 101 23 50 182 26 1,114 8 3 9 3 23 VOLUMES 470 2,059 316 402 2,038 343 452 1,038 229 455 1,446 228 9,476 57 74 75 35 241 APPROACH % 17% 72% 11% 14% 73% 12% 26% 60% 13% 21% 68% 11% APP/DEPART 2,845 / 2,738 2,783 / 2,744 1,719 / 1,717 2,129 / 2,277 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 226 1,040 153 227 1,001 151 223 546 116 241 755 132 4,811 APPROACH % 16% 73% 11% 16% 73% 11% 25% 62% 13% 21% 67% 12% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.900 0.979 0.930 0.931 0.982
APP/DEPART 1,419 / 1,402 1,379 / 1,363 885 / 899 1,128 / 1,147 0 Euclid

NORTH SIDE
Ball WEST SIDE EAST SIDE Ball

SOUTH SIDE
Euclid

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
Anaheim
Euclid
Ball

U-TURNS
Euclid Euclid Ball Ball
AM
7:30 AM
PM
4:15 PM
Add U-Turns to Left Turns
Appendix C
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
DRAFT Task 2 – State of the System Report
175
Appendix C - Study Area Intersections AM
and PM Peak Hour Counts

INSERT PDF OF COUNTS
4,888 705 3,491 692 TOTAL 4,859
2,783 343 2,038 402 PM 2,738
2,105 362 1,453 290 AM 2,121
1,470 2,129 3,599
3,843 2,277 1,566
145 228 373
940
1,446 2,386
TOTAL
PM
AM
385 455 840
869 452 417
AM
PM
TOTAL
2,518 1,038 1,480
490 229 261
2,092 1,717 3,809
3,877 1,719 2,158
2,117 AM 280 1,542 341 2,163
2,744 PM 470 2,059 316 2,845
4,861 TOTAL 750 3,601 657 5,008
2,508 355 1,764 389 TOTAL 2,542
1,379 151 1,001 227 PM 1,402
1,129 204 763 162 AM 1,140
853
1,128 1,981
2,045 1,147
898
85 132 217
536 755
1,291
TOTAL
PM
AM
AM 7:30 AM
8:45 AM
232 241 473
455 223 232
#N/A
AM
PM
TOTAL
1,312
546 766
PM 4:15 PM
5:45 PM
249 116 133
1,131
899
2,030
2,016
885
1,131
1,136 AM 165 812 215 1,192
1,363 PM 226 1,040 153 1,419
2,499 Total 391 1,852 368 2,611
AimTD LLC

TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
Euclid
Ball
Ball
SC

ALL HOURS
Anaheim
Euclid
Euclid
Euclid
Ball
Ball

PEAK HOUR
Appendix C
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
DRAFT Task 2 – State of the System Report
175
Appendix C - Study Area Intersections AM
and PM Peak Hour Counts

INSERT PDF OF COUNTS
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC
Thu, Oct 21, 21 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 57
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 0 2 3 1 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 22 114 25 32 147 14 30 167 20 25 70 19 685 0 1 7 2 10 7:15 AM 23 114 30 32 199 21 42 201 34 39 82 25 842 1 1 9 1 12 7:30 AM 19 195 37 59 248 30 38 220 25 42 74 34 1,021 0 3 7 2 12 7:45 AM 27 159 38 50 207 24 57 271 38 60 96 44 1,071 1 2 3 2 8 8:00 AM 36 181 26 36 178 26 39 224 32 58 101 35 972 1 2 3 4 10 8:15 AM 35 186 23 50 172 21 43 201 28 43 83 34 919 3 5 7 0 15 8:30 AM 27 158 17 45 155 20 44 205 32 37 110 40 890 3 3 5 1 12 8:45 AM 31 167 13 45 204 24 59 144 22 42 87 25 863 1 5 12 2 20 VOLUMES 220 1,274 209 349 1,510 180 352 1,633 231 346 703 256 7,263 10 22 53 14 99 APPROACH % 13% 75% 12% 17% 74% 9% 16% 74% 10% 27% 54% 20% APP/DEPART 1,703 / 1,851 2,039 / 2,083 2,216 / 2,183 1,305 / 1,146 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 117 721 124 195 805 101 177 916 123 203 354 147 3,983 APPROACH % 12% 75% 13% 18% 73% 9% 15% 75% 10% 29% 50% 21% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.958 0.817 0.831 0.880 0.930
APP/DEPART 962 / 1,037 1,101 / 1,128 1,216 / 1,231 704 / 587 0 4:00 PM 41 239 24 40 195 26 39 158 31 52 142 40 1,027 1 1 6 4 12 4:15 PM 37 235 26 62 172 22 49 206 24 51 182 44 1,110 2 8 7 4 21 4:30 PM 31 262 27 43 218 40 71 191 37 64 171 44 1,199 2 3 8 5 18 4:45 PM 58 212 25 49 173 26 55 207 42 64 213 45 1,169 4 4 1 7 16 5:00 PM 45 217 33 38 217 29 82 194 20 71 175 60 1,181 4 1 13 7 25 5:15 PM 71 260 29 47 231 39 59 195 30 53 248 47 1,309 9 3 11 3 26 5:30 PM 56 207 22 56 197 39 71 192 31 61 193 54 1,179 4 5 10 2 21 5:45 PM 47 272 32 60 228 28 78 149 25 78 175 45 1,217 3 12 19 6 40 VOLUMES 386 1,904 218 395 1,631 249 504 1,492 240 494 1,499 379 9,391 29 37 75 38 179 APPROACH % 15% 76% 9% 17% 72% 11% 23% 67% 11% 21% 63% 16% APP/DEPART 2,508 / 2,749 2,275 / 2,356 2,236 / 2,106 2,372 / 2,180 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 219 956 116 201 873 135 290 730 106 263 791 206 4,886 APPROACH % 17% 74% 9% 17% 72% 11% 26% 65% 9% 21% 63% 16% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.897 0.953 0.951 0.905 0.933
APP/DEPART 1,291 / 1,420 1,209 / 1,244 1,126 / 1,044 1,260 / 1,178 0 Euclid

NORTH SIDE
Katella WEST SIDE EAST SIDE Katella

SOUTH SIDE
Euclid

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
Anaheim
Euclid
Katella

U-TURNS
Euclid Euclid Katella Katella
AM
7:30 AM
PM
5:00 PM
Add U-Turns to Left Turns
Appendix C
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
DRAFT Task 2 – State of the System Report
175
Appendix C - Study Area Intersections AM
and PM Peak Hour Counts

INSERT PDF OF COUNTS
4,314 429 3,141 744 TOTAL 4,600
2,275 249 1,631 395 PM 2,749
2,039 180 1,510 349 AM 1,851
1,305 2,372 3,677
3,326 2,180 1,146
256 379 635
703
1,499 2,202
TOTAL
PM
AM
346 494 840
856 504 352
AM
PM
TOTAL
3,125 1,492 1,633
471 240 231
2,183 2,106 4,289
4,452 2,236 2,216
2,083 AM 220 1,274 209 1,703
2,356 PM 386 1,904 218 2,508
4,439 TOTAL 606 3,178 427 4,211
2,310 236 1,678 396 TOTAL 2,457
1,209 135 873 201 PM 1,420
1,101 101 805 195 AM 1,037
704
1,260 1,964
1,765 1,178
587
147 206 353
354 791
1,145
TOTAL
PM
AM
AM 7:30 AM
8:45 AM
203 263 466
467 290 177
#N/A
AM
PM
TOTAL
1,646
730 916
PM 5:00 PM
5:45 PM
229 106 123
1,231 1,044 2,275
2,342 1,126 1,216
1,128 AM 117 721 124 962
1,244 PM 219 956 116 1,291
2,372 Total 336 1,677 240 2,253
AimTD LLC

TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
Euclid
Katella
Katella
SC

ALL HOURS
Anaheim
Euclid
Euclid
Euclid
Katella
Katella

PEAK HOUR
Appendix C
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
DRAFT Task 2 – State of the System Report
175
Appendix C - Study Area Intersections AM
and PM Peak Hour Counts

INSERT PDF OF COUNTS
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC
Tue, Oct 5, 21 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 88
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 1 3 0 1 3 1 1 2 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 24 89 20 27 171 24 14 104 11 37 132 10 663 2 0 0 0 2 7:15 AM 17 106 31 23 212 24 27 137 17 37 153 8 792 2 0 0 0 2 7:30 AM 30 119 46 23 316 39 28 137 22 39 206 22 1,027 3 0 0 2 5 7:45 AM 40 142 30 34 245 41 47 182 19 42 245 23 1,090 2 0 0 1 3 8:00 AM 22 128 26 35 302 44 33 169 29 43 243 25 1,099 3 0 0 0 3 8:15 AM 30 148 27 46 259 47 52 190 25 46 251 30 1,151 2 0 0 0 2 8:30 AM 25 129 34 44 222 39 26 165 28 53 144 12 921 4 0 0 1 5 8:45 AM 20 121 21 23 200 24 46 125 20 40 114 13 767 2 0 0 1 3 VOLUMES 208 982 235 255 1,927 282 273 1,209 171 337 1,488 143 7,510 20 0 0 5 25 APPROACH % 15% 69% 16% 10% 78% 11% 17% 73% 10% 17% 76% 7% APP/DEPART 1,425 / 1,398 2,464 / 2,450 1,653 / 1,704 1,968 / 1,958 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 122 537 129 138 1,122 171 160 678 95 170 945 100 4,367 APPROACH % 15% 68% 16% 10% 78% 12% 17% 73% 10% 14% 78% 8% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.929 0.939 0.874 0.929 0.949
APP/DEPART 788 / 797 1,431 / 1,394 933 / 948 1,215 / 1,228 0 4:00 PM 34 223 40 29 218 35 45 178 35 45 221 30 1,133 9 0 0 4 13 4:15 PM 41 225 40 25 254 38 47 178 26 34 161 32 1,101 11 0 0 0 11 4:30 PM 31 214 32 29 199 38 33 187 20 33 211 28 1,055 5 0 0 0 5 4:45 PM 39 223 46 37 231 24 44 189 26 41 190 32 1,122 5 0 0 1 6 5:00 PM 36 188 45 26 228 37 30 195 23 39 217 30 1,094 3 0 0 2 5 5:15 PM 41 230 29 14 246 41 32 161 24 37 198 31 1,084 6 0 0 0 6 5:30 PM 31 200 45 19 193 28 42 179 23 50 199 34 1,043 2 0 0 1 3 5:45 PM 35 209 44 29 197 39 46 175 22 36 175 24 1,031 9 0 0 0 9 VOLUMES 288 1,712 321 208 1,766 280 319 1,442 199 315 1,572 241 8,663 50 0 0 8 58 APPROACH % 12% 74% 14% 9% 78% 12% 16% 74% 10% 15% 74% 11% APP/DEPART 2,321 / 2,272 2,254 / 2,322 1,960 / 1,979 2,128 / 2,090 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 145 885 158 120 902 135 169 732 107 153 783 122 4,411 APPROACH % 12% 74% 13% 10% 78% 12% 17% 73% 11% 14% 74% 12% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.964 0.912 0.973 0.894 0.973
APP/DEPART 1,188 / 1,176 1,157 / 1,187 1,008 / 1,015 1,058 / 1,033 0 Harbor

NORTH SIDE
Lincoln WEST SIDE EAST SIDE Lincoln

SOUTH SIDE
Harbor

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
Anaheim
Harbor
Lincoln

U-TURNS
Harbor Harbor Lincoln Lincoln
AM
7:30 AM
PM
4:00 PM
Add U-Turns to Left Turns
Appendix C
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
DRAFT Task 2 – State of the System Report
175
Appendix C - Study Area Intersections AM
and PM Peak Hour Counts

INSERT PDF OF COUNTS
4,718 562 3,693 463 TOTAL 3,670
2,254 280 1,766 208 PM 2,272
2,464 282 1,927 255 AM 1,398
1,968 2,128 4,096
4,048 2,090 1,958
143 241 384
1,488 1,572 3,060
TOTAL
PM
AM
337 315 652
592 319 273
AM
PM
TOTAL
2,651 1,442 1,209
370 199 171
1,704 1,979 3,683
3,613 1,960 1,653
2,450 AM 208 982 235 1,425
2,322 PM 288 1,712 321 2,321
4,772 TOTAL 496 2,694 556 3,746
2,588 306 2,024 258 TOTAL 1,973
1,157 135 902 120 PM 1,176
1,431 171 1,122 138 AM 797
1,215 1,058 2,273
2,261 1,033 1,228
100 122 222
945 783
1,728
TOTAL
PM
AM
AM 7:30 AM
8:45 AM
170 153 323
329 169 160
#N/A
AM
PM
TOTAL
1,410
732 678
PM 4:00 PM
5:45 PM
202 107
95 948
1,015 1,963
1,941 1,008
933
1,394 AM 122 537 129 788
1,187 PM 145 885 158 1,188
2,581 Total 267 1,422 287 1,976
AimTD LLC

TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
Harbor
Lincoln
Lincoln
SC

ALL HOURS
Anaheim
Harbor
Harbor
Harbor
Lincoln
Lincoln

PEAK HOUR
Appendix C
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
DRAFT Task 2 – State of the System Report
175
Appendix C - Study Area Intersections AM
and PM Peak Hour Counts

INSERT PDF OF COUNTS
T218
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC3156
Thu, Oct 28, 21 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 93
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 4 0 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 131 98 55 20 190 62 18 124 57 36 173 8 972 5 0 1 3 9 7:15 AM 149 112 38 20 259 73 42 181 79 34 162 14 1,163 5 0 3 5 13 7:30 AM 165 103 41 24 249 113 33 180 67 39 247 29 1,290 7 1 2 3 13 7:45 AM 169 134 59 40 237 79 39 189 72 28 180 28 1,254 6 0 2 1 9 8:00 AM 154 134 53 34 241 91 35 146 74 40 175 16 1,193 4 1 3 4 12 8:15 AM 167 114 67 16 218 85 23 147 74 36 191 15 1,153 5 0 1 4 10 8:30 AM 156 108 48 25 169 74 32 145 62 20 195 12 1,046 5 0 6 4 15 8:45 AM 182 118 64 21 163 82 26 141 52 25 199 14 1,087 6 0 0 3 9 VOLUMES 1,273 921 425 200 1,726 659 248 1,253 537 258 1,522 136 9,158 43 2 18 27 90 APPROACH % 49% 35% 16% 8% 67% 25% 12% 61% 26% 13% 79% 7% APP/DEPART 2,619 / 1,289 2,585 / 2,537 2,038 / 1,903 1,916 / 3,429 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 637 483 191 118 986 356 149 696 292 141 764 87 4,900 APPROACH % 49% 37% 15% 8% 68% 24% 13% 61% 26% 14% 77% 9% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.905 0.946 0.941 0.787 0.950
APP/DEPART 1,311 / 711 1,460 / 1,428 1,137 / 1,016 992 / 1,745 0 4:00 PM 192 175 71 20 191 96 60 195 72 22 328 13 1,435 2 0 2 5 9 4:15 PM 219 187 66 19 153 85 54 158 64 39 310 19 1,373 1 0 6 6 13 4:30 PM 186 225 66 30 194 80 67 172 74 43 313 20 1,470 5 2 4 4 15 4:45 PM 170 206 61 15 209 83 72 180 80 42 287 22 1,427 7 0 3 7 17 5:00 PM 151 253 72 12 205 91 52 153 81 34 376 17 1,497 8 1 5 5 19 5:15 PM 168 236 89 22 216 114 61 183 77 34 317 16 1,533 7 0 7 4 18 5:30 PM 165 250 92 22 167 76 73 148 72 34 270 20 1,389 4 0 5 4 13 5:45 PM 167 213 73 22 146 66 55 181 75 26 329 22 1,375 4 1 2 4 11 VOLUMES 1,418 1,745 590 162 1,481 691 494 1,370 595 274 2,530 149 11,499 38 4 34 39 115 APPROACH % 38% 46% 16% 7% 63% 30% 20% 56% 24% 9% 86% 5% APP/DEPART 3,753 / 2,358 2,334 / 2,349 2,459 / 2,157 2,953 / 4,635 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 675 920 288 79 824 368 252 688 312 153 1,293 75 5,927 APPROACH % 36% 49% 15% 6% 65% 29% 20% 55% 25% 10% 85% 5% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.955 0.903 0.943 0.891 0.967
APP/DEPART 1,883 / 1,231 1,271 / 1,296 1,252 / 1,072 1,521 / 2,328 0 Harbor

NORTH SIDE
Ball WEST SIDE EAST SIDE Ball

SOUTH SIDE
Harbor
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected] Anaheim
Harbor
Ball

U-TURNS
Harbor Harbor Ball Ball
AM
7:15 AM
PM
4:30 PM
Add U-Turns to Left Turns
Appendix C
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
DRAFT Task 2 – State of the System Report
175
Appendix C - Study Area Intersections AM
and PM Peak Hour Counts

INSERT PDF OF COUNTS
4,919 1,350 3,207 362 TOTAL 3,647
2,334 691 1,481 162 PM 2,358
2,585 659 1,726 200 AM 1,289
1,916 2,953 4,869
8,064 4,635 3,429
136 149 285
1,522 2,530 4,052
TOTAL
PM
AM
258 274 532
742 494 248
AM
PM
TOTAL
2,623 1,370 1,253
1,132
595 537
1,903 2,157 4,060
4,497 2,459 2,038
2,537 AM 1,273 921 425 2,619
2,349 PM 1,418 1,745 590 3,753
4,886 TOTAL 2,691 2,666 1,015 6,372
2,731 724 1,810 197 TOTAL 1,942
1,271 368 824 79 PM 1,231
1,460 356 986 118 AM 711
992
1,521 2,513
4,073 2,328 1,745
87 75
162
764
1,293 2,057
TOTAL
PM
AM
AM 7:15 AM
8:45 AM
141 153 294
401 252 149
#N/A
AM
PM
TOTAL
1,384
688 696
PM 4:30 PM
5:45 PM
604 312 292
1,016 1,072 2,088
2,389 1,252 1,137
1,428 AM 637 483 191 1,311
1,296 PM 675 920 288 1,883
2,724 Total 1,312 1,403 479 3,194
AimTD LLC

TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
Harbor
Ball
Ball
SC3156

ALL HOURS
Anaheim
Harbor
Harbor
Harbor
Ball
Ball

PEAK HOUR
Appendix C
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
DRAFT Task 2 – State of the System Report
175
Appendix C - Study Area Intersections AM
and PM Peak Hour Counts

INSERT PDF OF COUNTS
T218
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC3156
Thu, Oct 28, 21 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 98
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 1 3 0 2 3 0 X 2 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 0 111 11 11 117 0 0 0 0 6 1 26 283 4 12 0 1 17
7:15 AM 0 149 8 31 140 0 0 5 0 10 8 22 373 3 15 0 2 20
7:30 AM 0 132 8 25 174 0 0 7 0 23 4 23 396 5 11 0 2 18
7:45 AM 0 141 9 36 208 0 0 5 0 14 10 25 448 6 21 0 2 29 8:00 AM 0 146 12 31 202 0 0 11 0 13 7 27 449 2 30 0 1 33 8:15 AM 1 172 13 25 204 2 0 7 0 18 8 21 471 10 22 0 2 34 8:30 AM 0 169 22 30 203 0 0 11 0 16 12 30 493 1 15 0 1 17 8:45 AM 1 164 10 27 199 0 0 11 1 13 10 31 467 1 27 0 6 34 VOLUMES 2 1,184 93 216 1,447 2 0 57 1 113 60 205 3,582 32 153 0 17 202 APPROACH % 0% 90% 7% 12% 80% 0% 0% 98% 2% 29% 15% 52%
APP/DEPART 1,311 / 1,542 1,818 / 1,593 58 / 383 395 / 64 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 2 651 57 113 808 2 0 40 1 60 37 109 1,998
APPROACH % 0% 90% 8% 11% 79% 0% 0% 98% 2% 28% 17% 50%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.923 0.967 0.854 0.900 0.979
APP/DEPART 724 / 854 1,017 / 883 41 / 220 216 / 41 0
4:00 PM 0 198 18 32 153 0 0 8 0 17 10 36 472 6 26 0 4 36 4:15 PM 2 218 21 28 199 0 0 8 3 26 6 38 549 7 27 0 2 36 4:30 PM 0 243 23 37 173 0 0 9 0 19 8 39 551 6 22 0 3 31 4:45 PM 1 234 18 42 208 0 0 6 1 14 8 40 572 2 23 0 1 26 5:00 PM 0 233 25 25 188 0 0 7 0 19 8 41 546 5 33 0 4 42 5:15 PM 0 247 24 41 203 0 0 7 0 17 6 37 582 3 40 0 5 48 5:30 PM 2 247 22 32 182 0 0 6 1 12 5 53 562 7 35 0 1 43 5:45 PM 0 230 23 38 193 0 0 6 0 19 8 38 555 9 34 0 2 45 VOLUMES 5 1,850 174 275 1,499 0 0 57 5 143 59 322 4,696 45 240 0 22 307 APPROACH % 0% 89% 8% 14% 74% 0% 0% 92% 8% 26% 11% 59%
APP/DEPART 2,074 / 2,412 2,014 / 1,692 62 / 528 546 / 64 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 2 957 94 136 766 0 0 26 1 67 27 169 2,423
APPROACH % 0% 89% 9% 13% 73% 0% 0% 96% 4% 24% 10% 61%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.969 0.919 0.964 0.955 0.962
APP/DEPART 1,077 / 1,268 1,044 / 858 27 / 268 275 / 29 0 Harbor

NORTH SIDE
Disney WEST SIDE EAST SIDE Disney

SOUTH SIDE
Harbor
AM
8:00 AM
PM
5:00 PM

U-TURNS
Harbor Harbor Disney Disney
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected] Anaheim
Harbor
Disney
Add U-Turns to Left Turns
Appendix C
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
DRAFT Task 2 – State of the System Report
175
Appendix C - Study Area Intersections AM
and PM Peak Hour Counts

INSERT PDF OF COUNTS
3,832 2 2,946 491 TOTAL 3,954
2,014 0 1,499 275 PM 2,412
1,818 2 1,447 216 AM 1,542
395 546 941
128
64 64
205 322 527
60 59
119
TOTAL
PM
AM
113 143 256
0 0 0
AM
PM
TOTAL
114
57 57
6 5 1
383 528 911
120
62 58
1,593 AM 2 1,184 93 1,311
1,692 PM 5 1,850 174 2,074
3,285 TOTAL 7 3,034 267 3,385
2,061 2 1,574 249 TOTAL 2,122
1,044 0 766 136 PM 1,268
1,017 2 808 113 AM 854
216 275 491
70 29 41
109 169 278
37 27 64
TOTAL
PM
AM
AM 8:00 AM
8:45 AM
60 67
127
0 0 0
#N/A
AM
PM
TOTAL
66 26 40
PM 5:00 PM
5:45 PM
2 1 1
220 268 488
68 27 41
883 AM 2 651 57 724
858 PM 2 957 94 1,077
1,741 Total 4 1,608 151 1,801
Harbor
Harbor
Harbor
Disney
Disney

PEAK HOUR
AimTD LLC

TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
Harbor
Disney
Disney
SC3156

ALL HOURS
Anaheim
Appendix C
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
DRAFT Task 2 – State of the System Report
175
Appendix C - Study Area Intersections AM
and PM Peak Hour Counts

INSERT PDF OF COUNTS
T218
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC
Tue, Nov 2, 21 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 99
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 18 93 13 9 98 25 33 196 12 31 114 8 650 2 4 3 2 11 7:15 AM 19 88 13 18 105 21 20 244 17 33 132 9 719 5 3 6 5 19 7:30 AM 36 116 27 18 122 37 36 266 20 44 133 19 874 10 4 6 3 23 7:45 AM 27 130 28 24 141 37 22 299 15 50 139 15 927 3 5 4 7 19 8:00 AM 27 124 28 19 134 41 32 267 20 44 136 26 898 7 5 8 7 27 8:15 AM 18 116 29 23 161 37 35 268 18 45 123 24 897 0 6 7 9 22 8:30 AM 27 94 28 24 146 27 35 225 24 61 163 20 874 6 6 9 12 33 8:45 AM 18 93 13 27 108 37 47 211 25 50 135 21 785 2 12 3 9 26 VOLUMES 190 854 179 162 1,015 262 260 1,976 151 358 1,075 142 6,624 35 45 46 54 180 APPROACH % 16% 70% 15% 11% 71% 18% 11% 83% 6% 23% 68% 9% APP/DEPART 1,223 / 1,255 1,439 / 1,505 2,387 / 2,326 1,575 / 1,538 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 99 464 113 90 582 142 124 1,059 77 200 561 85 3,596 APPROACH % 15% 69% 17% 11% 71% 17% 10% 84% 6% 24% 66% 10% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.914 0.921 0.938 0.867 0.970
APP/DEPART 676 / 667 814 / 840 1,260 / 1,275 846 / 814 0 4:00 PM 21 160 28 15 144 33 43 185 13 51 228 17 938 1 7 8 3 19 4:15 PM 26 133 34 17 118 32 39 191 17 62 287 17 973 0 3 3 9 15 4:30 PM 30 198 50 18 132 30 55 207 40 48 266 22 1,096 6 3 15 4 28 4:45 PM 34 150 38 18 136 26 40 218 36 68 261 20 1,045 6 5 2 10 23 5:00 PM 33 190 34 14 128 32 48 206 38 46 311 37 1,117 4 2 12 5 23 5:15 PM 37 146 27 16 139 42 45 196 27 49 298 31 1,053 6 2 6 7 21 5:30 PM 35 182 36 21 141 45 40 201 23 67 290 27 1,108 7 3 16 10 36 5:45 PM 41 173 47 8 121 29 32 205 17 53 271 19 1,016 7 2 10 9 28 VOLUMES 257 1,332 294 127 1,059 269 342 1,609 211 444 2,212 190 8,346 37 27 72 57 193 APPROACH % 14% 71% 16% 9% 73% 18% 16% 74% 10% 16% 78% 7% APP/DEPART 1,883 / 1,819 1,455 / 1,694 2,162 / 2,060 2,846 / 2,773 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 139 668 135 69 544 145 173 821 124 230 1,160 115 4,323 APPROACH % 15% 71% 14% 9% 72% 19% 15% 73% 11% 15% 77% 8% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.916 0.915 0.951 0.955 0.968
APP/DEPART 942 / 932 758 / 889 1,118 / 1,045 1,505 / 1,457 0 Harbor

NORTH SIDE
Katella WEST SIDE EAST SIDE Katella

SOUTH SIDE
Harbor
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected] Anaheim
Harbor
Katella

U-TURNS
Harbor Harbor Katella Katella
AM
7:45 AM
PM
4:45 PM
Add U-Turns to Left Turns
Appendix C
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
DRAFT Task 2 – State of the System Report
175
Appendix C - Study Area Intersections AM
and PM Peak Hour Counts

INSERT PDF OF COUNTS
2,894 531 2,074 289 TOTAL 3,074
1,455 269 1,059 127 PM 1,819
1,439 262 1,015 162 AM 1,255
1,575 2,846 4,421
4,311 2,773 1,538
142 190 332
1,075 2,212 3,287
TOTAL
PM
AM
358 444 802
602 342 260
AM
PM
TOTAL
3,585 1,609 1,976
362 211 151
2,326 2,060 4,386
4,549 2,162 2,387
1,505 AM 190 854 179 1,223
1,694 PM 257 1,332 294 1,883
3,199 TOTAL 447 2,186 473 3,106
1,572 287 1,126 159 TOTAL 1,599
758 145 544 69 PM 932
814 142 582 90 AM 667
846
1,505 2,351
2,271 1,457
814
85 115 200
561
1,160 1,721
TOTAL
PM
AM
AM 7:45 AM
8:45 AM
200 230 430
297 173 124
#N/A
AM
PM
TOTAL
1,880
821
1,059
PM 4:45 PM
5:45 PM
201 124
77 1,275 1,045 2,320
2,378 1,118 1,260
840 AM 99 464 113 676
889 PM 139 668 135 942
1,729 Total 238 1,132 248 1,618
AimTD LLC

TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
Harbor
Katella
Katella
SC

ALL HOURS
Anaheim
Harbor
Harbor
Harbor
Katella
Katella

PEAK HOUR
Appendix C
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
DRAFT Task 2 – State of the System Report
175
Appendix C - Study Area Intersections AM
and PM Peak Hour Counts

INSERT PDF OF COUNTS
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC
Tue, Oct 5, 21 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 114
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 3 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 11 43 8 18 72 36 20 103 15 26 137 12 501 0 0 0 0 0 7:15 AM 12 65 16 27 77 28 16 122 20 35 152 12 582 0 0 1 1 2 7:30 AM 32 96 20 26 81 30 20 152 13 33 193 21 717 0 1 0 0 1 7:45 AM 15 73 17 34 135 41 18 151 20 42 276 31 853 0 1 0 1 2 8:00 AM 11 76 15 37 104 35 28 159 22 32 248 17 784 1 0 0 1 2 8:15 AM 20 64 11 26 82 44 28 165 23 42 234 25 764 0 0 1 0 1 8:30 AM 15 82 11 30 81 31 37 148 23 19 162 22 661 0 0 1 0 1 8:45 AM 10 73 12 16 78 18 20 95 19 31 115 19 506 0 0 0 0 0 VOLUMES 126 572 110 214 710 263 187 1,095 155 260 1,517 159 5,368 1 2 3 3 9 APPROACH % 16% 71% 14% 18% 60% 22% 13% 76% 11% 13% 78% 8% APP/DEPART 808 / 917 1,187 / 1,123 1,437 / 1,420 1,936 / 1,908 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 78 309 63 123 402 150 94 627 78 149 951 94 3,118 APPROACH % 17% 69% 14% 18% 60% 22% 12% 78% 10% 12% 80% 8% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.760 0.804 0.925 0.855 0.914
APP/DEPART 450 / 498 675 / 628 799 / 813 1,194 / 1,179 0 4:00 PM 30 144 24 31 101 33 41 158 23 24 174 27 810 2 0 1 1 4 4:15 PM 18 120 23 23 107 36 35 182 19 33 157 26 779 1 1 1 1 4 4:30 PM 33 137 32 31 100 36 31 151 16 20 154 25 766 1 0 0 0 1 4:45 PM 24 115 20 29 104 26 35 195 27 23 205 31 834 0 0 0 1 1 5:00 PM 36 123 25 35 129 26 30 193 20 29 152 26 824 0 0 0 0 0 5:15 PM 38 117 30 37 73 39 35 149 22 34 199 31 804 1 1 0 0 2 5:30 PM 34 138 23 34 101 43 31 165 20 25 168 28 810 0 1 0 1 2 5:45 PM 22 114 11 17 75 31 35 169 24 37 177 28 740 0 3 0 0 3 VOLUMES 235 1,008 188 237 790 270 273 1,362 171 225 1,386 222 6,367 5 6 2 4 17 APPROACH % 16% 70% 13% 18% 61% 21% 15% 75% 9% 12% 76% 12% APP/DEPART 1,431 / 1,507 1,297 / 1,187 1,806 / 1,785 1,833 / 1,888 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 132 493 98 135 407 134 131 702 89 111 724 116 3,272 APPROACH % 18% 68% 14% 20% 60% 20% 14% 76% 10% 12% 76% 12% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.927 0.889 0.897 0.901 0.981
APP/DEPART 723 / 742 676 / 606 922 / 935 951 / 989 0
Anaheim

NORTH SIDE
Lincoln WEST SIDE EAST SIDE Lincoln

SOUTH SIDE
Anaheim
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected] Anaheim
Anaheim
Lincoln

U-TURNS
Anaheim Anaheim Lincoln Lincoln
AM
7:30 AM
PM
4:45 PM
Add U-Turns to Left Turns
Appendix C
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
DRAFT Task 2 – State of the System Report
175
Appendix C - Study Area Intersections AM
and PM Peak Hour Counts

INSERT PDF OF COUNTS
2,484 533 1,500 451 TOTAL 2,424
1,297 270 790 237 PM 1,507
1,187 263 710 214 AM 917
1,936 1,833 3,769
3,796 1,888 1,908
159 222 381
1,517 1,386 2,903
TOTAL
PM
AM
260 225 485
460 273 187
AM
PM
TOTAL
2,457 1,362 1,095
326 171 155
1,420 1,785 3,205
3,243 1,806 1,437
1,123 AM 126 572 110 808
1,187 PM 235 1,008 188 1,431
2,310 TOTAL 361 1,580 298 2,239
1,351 284 809 258 TOTAL 1,240
676 134 407 135 PM 742
675 150 402 123 AM 498
1,194
951
2,145
2,168
989
1,179
94 116 210
951 724
1,675
TOTAL
PM
AM
AM 7:30 AM
8:45 AM
149 111 260
225 131
94 #N/A
AM
PM
TOTAL
1,329
702 627
PM 4:45 PM
5:45 PM
167
89 78
813 935
1,748
1,721
922 799
628 AM 78 309 63 450
606 PM 132 493 98 723
1,234 Total 210 802 161 1,173
AimTD LLC

TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
Anaheim
Lincoln
Lincoln
SC

ALL HOURS
Anaheim
Anaheim
Anaheim
Anaheim
Lincoln
Lincoln

PEAK HOUR
Appendix C
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
DRAFT Task 2 – State of the System Report
175
Appendix C - Study Area Intersections AM
and PM Peak Hour Counts

INSERT PDF OF COUNTS
T218
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC3156
Thu, Oct 28, 21 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 119
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 2 3 1 2 3 0 2 3 0 2 3 1 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 17 80 22 30 165 15 21 133 16 28 153 14 694 1 0 9 0 10 7:15 AM 15 70 23 37 163 15 32 209 21 23 183 10 801 0 1 13 0 14 7:30 AM 26 77 64 55 213 21 23 163 21 40 184 16 903 0 2 10 3 15 7:45 AM 14 101 38 37 189 30 28 223 33 17 170 14 894 0 0 6 1 7 8:00 AM 36 78 31 31 183 27 26 185 18 26 136 15 792 1 1 13 1 16 8:15 AM 19 86 22 28 137 29 39 170 19 27 173 14 763 0 2 10 3 15 8:30 AM 36 99 21 20 139 26 37 139 24 31 168 20 760 0 1 15 1 17 8:45 AM 16 80 14 26 129 27 33 172 34 30 192 18 771 0 0 11 0 11 VOLUMES 179 671 235 264 1,318 190 239 1,394 186 222 1,359 121 6,378 2 7 87 9 105 APPROACH % 16% 62% 22% 15% 74% 11% 13% 77% 10% 13% 80% 7% APP/DEPART 1,085 / 951 1,772 / 1,719 1,819 / 1,895 1,702 / 1,813 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 91 326 156 160 748 93 109 780 93 106 673 55 3,390 APPROACH % 16% 57% 27% 16% 75% 9% 11% 79% 9% 13% 81% 7% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.858 0.866 0.864 0.869 0.939
APP/DEPART 573 / 452 1,001 / 943 982 / 1,097 834 / 898 0 4:00 PM 53 200 41 23 212 27 35 179 27 39 227 47 1,110 0 0 6 0 6 4:15 PM 55 176 28 24 157 29 54 163 33 54 333 34 1,140 1 2 12 1 16 4:30 PM 43 198 25 27 173 38 42 186 41 36 270 30 1,109 1 3 11 2 17 4:45 PM 55 202 25 35 190 30 25 177 19 41 298 37 1,134 1 1 8 0 10 5:00 PM 57 254 24 23 185 26 47 172 22 42 324 43 1,219 1 2 8 0 11 5:15 PM 32 202 20 26 231 36 35 219 41 34 304 31 1,211 3 5 4 0 12 5:30 PM 52 260 31 26 157 22 41 181 26 40 233 34 1,103 1 2 9 4 16 5:45 PM 58 255 20 28 155 31 33 145 30 48 244 23 1,070 0 5 11 0 16 VOLUMES 405 1,747 214 212 1,460 239 312 1,422 239 334 2,233 279 9,096 8 20 69 7 104 APPROACH % 17% 74% 9% 11% 76% 13% 16% 72% 12% 12% 78% 10% APP/DEPART 2,366 / 2,289 1,911 / 2,034 1,973 / 1,835 2,846 / 2,938 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 187 856 94 111 779 130 149 754 123 153 1,196 141 4,673 APPROACH % 16% 75% 8% 11% 76% 13% 15% 73% 12% 10% 80% 9% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.849 0.870 0.869 0.911 0.958
APP/DEPART 1,137 / 1,126 1,020 / 1,059 1,026 / 950 1,490 / 1,538 0 Anaheim

NORTH SIDE
Ball WEST SIDE EAST SIDE Ball

SOUTH SIDE
Anaheim
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected] Anaheim
Anaheim
Ball

U-TURNS
Anaheim Anaheim Ball Ball
AM
7:15 AM
PM
4:30 PM
Add U-Turns to Left Turns
Appendix C
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
DRAFT Task 2 – State of the System Report
175
Appendix C - Study Area Intersections AM
and PM Peak Hour Counts

INSERT PDF OF COUNTS
3,683 429 2,778 476 TOTAL 3,240
1,911 239 1,460 212 PM 2,289
1,772 190 1,318 264 AM 951
1,702 2,846 4,548
4,751 2,938 1,813
121 279 400
1,359 2,233 3,592
TOTAL
PM
AM
222 334 556
551 312 239
AM
PM
TOTAL
2,816 1,422 1,394
425 239 186
1,895 1,835 3,730
3,792 1,973 1,819
1,719 AM 179 671 235 1,085
2,034 PM 405 1,747 214 2,366
3,753 TOTAL 584 2,418 449 3,451
2,021 223 1,527 271 TOTAL 1,578
1,020 130 779 111 PM 1,126
1,001 93 748 160 AM 452
834
1,490 2,324
2,436 1,538
898
55 141 196
673
1,196 1,869
TOTAL
PM
AM
AM 7:15 AM
8:45 AM
106 153 259
258 149 109
#N/A
AM
PM
TOTAL
1,534
754 780
PM 4:30 PM
5:45 PM
216 123
93 1,097
950
2,047
2,008 1,026
982
943 AM 91 326 156 573
1,059 PM 187 856 94 1,137
2,002 Total 278 1,182 250 1,710
AimTD LLC

TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
Anaheim
Ball
Ball
SC3156

ALL HOURS
Anaheim
Anaheim
Anaheim
Anaheim
Ball
Ball

PEAK HOUR
Appendix C
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
DRAFT Task 2 – State of the System Report
175
Appendix C - Study Area Intersections AM
and PM Peak Hour Counts

INSERT PDF OF COUNTS
T218
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC3156
Thu, Oct 28, 21 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 122
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 1 3 0 2 2.5 0.5 2 3.5 0.5 X 3 0 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 6 122 1 131 51 24 37 14 21 0 45 0 452 0 1 0 0 1 7:15 AM 7 144 1 120 128 16 25 39 16 0 56 2 554 3 1 0 0 4 7:30 AM 10 111 3 115 112 26 29 23 22 0 59 0 510 1 0 0 0 1 7:45 AM 9 170 2 123 87 18 43 25 20 0 48 0 545 2 0 0 0 2 8:00 AM 11 137 3 122 101 22 53 17 25 0 46 0 537 4 3 0 0 7 8:15 AM 11 149 2 84 111 18 40 21 36 0 48 0 520 1 3 0 0 4 8:30 AM 10 134 6 102 68 27 46 28 22 0 78 0 521 3 5 0 0 8 8:45 AM 9 140 2 83 100 26 53 20 33 0 53 1 520 2 0 0 0 2 VOLUMES 73 1,107 20 880 758 177 326 187 195 0 433 3 4,159 16 13 0 0 29 APPROACH % 6% 92% 2% 48% 42% 10% 46% 26% 28% 0% 99% 1%
APP/DEPART 1,200 / 1,449 1,815 / 969 708 / 1,074 436 / 667 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 37 562 9 480 428 82 150 104 83 0 209 2 2,146
APPROACH % 6% 92% 1% 48% 43% 8% 45% 31% 25% 0% 99% 1%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.840 0.938 0.887 0.894 0.968
APP/DEPART 608 / 718 990 / 521 337 / 589 211 / 318 0
4:00 PM 10 159 6 138 151 22 63 61 34 0 80 2 726 3 1 0 0 4 4:15 PM 13 161 3 142 138 16 39 72 43 0 68 2 697 4 0 0 0 4 4:30 PM 15 171 3 116 199 23 63 41 43 0 71 1 746 1 3 0 0 4 4:45 PM 16 187 8 125 142 20 49 69 41 0 66 1 724 6 3 0 0 9 5:00 PM 15 197 6 124 148 14 57 40 56 0 90 0 747 1 1 0 0 2 5:15 PM 16 176 2 121 164 24 60 50 49 0 75 0 737 4 4 0 0 8 5:30 PM 22 244 6 119 125 20 57 71 58 0 69 0 791 4 1 0 0 5 5:45 PM 9 164 3 94 123 21 55 49 32 0 69 1 620 1 3 0 0 4 VOLUMES 116 1,459 37 979 1,190 160 443 453 356 0 588 7 5,788 24 16 0 0 40 APPROACH % 7% 91% 2% 42% 51% 7% 35% 36% 28% 0% 99% 1%
APP/DEPART 1,612 / 1,925 2,329 / 1,570 1,252 / 1,453 595 / 840 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 69 804 22 489 579 78 223 230 204 0 300 1 2,999
APPROACH % 8% 90% 2% 43% 51% 7% 34% 35% 31% 0% 100% 0%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.823 0.927 0.883 0.836 0.948
APP/DEPART 895 / 1,037 1,146 / 798 657 / 732 301 / 432 0 Anaheim

NORTH SIDE
I-5 SB Ramps WEST SIDE EAST SIDE I-5 SB Ramps

SOUTH SIDE
Anaheim
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected] Anaheim
Anaheim
I-5 SB Ramps

U-TURNS
Anaheim Anaheim I-5 SB Ramps - Disney I-5 SB Ramps - Disney AM
7:15 AM
PM
4:45 PM
Add U-Turns to Left Turns
Appendix C
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
DRAFT Task 2 – State of the System Report
175
Appendix C - Study Area Intersections AM
and PM Peak Hour Counts

INSERT PDF OF COUNTS
4,144 337 1,948 1,859 TOTAL 3,374
2,329 160 1,190 979 PM 1,925
1,815 177 758 880 AM 1,449
436 595
1,031
1,507
840 667
3 7
10 433 588
1,021
TOTAL
PM
AM
0 0 0
769 443 326
AM
PM
TOTAL
640 453 187
551 356 195
1,074 1,453 2,527
1,960 1,252
708
969 AM 73 1,107 20 1,200
1,570 PM 116 1,459 37 1,612
2,539 TOTAL 189 2,566 57 2,812
2,136 160 1,007 969 TOTAL 1,755
1,146 78 579 489 PM 1,037
990 82 428 480 AM 718
211 301 512
750 432 318
2 1 3
209 300 509
TOTAL
PM
AM
AM 7:15 AM
8:45 AM
0 0 0
373 223 150
#N/A
AM
PM
TOTAL
334 230 104
PM 4:45 PM
5:45 PM
287 204
83 589 732
1,321
994 657 337
521 AM 37 562 9 608
798 PM 69 804 22 895
1,319 Total 106 1,366 31 1,503
AimTD LLC

TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
Anaheim
I-5 SB Ramps - Disney
I-5 SB Ramps - Disney
SC3156

ALL HOURS
Anaheim
Anaheim
Anaheim
Anaheim
I-5 SB Ramps - Disney
I-5 SB Ramps - Disney

PEAK HOUR
Appendix C
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
DRAFT Task 2 – State of the System Report
175
Appendix C - Study Area Intersections AM
and PM Peak Hour Counts

INSERT PDF OF COUNTS
T218
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC
Tue, Nov 2, 21 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 123
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3.5 0.5 2 3 1 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 22 85 36 22 50 18 11 183 18 29 132 4 610 0 1 1 7 9 7:15 AM 24 119 43 26 75 15 22 224 18 20 132 6 724 0 2 1 3 6 7:30 AM 25 105 35 21 58 31 13 282 18 17 181 5 791 1 4 0 1 6 7:45 AM 23 123 33 15 99 26 40 255 17 23 168 8 830 0 1 6 9 16 8:00 AM 31 95 17 17 89 27 35 218 18 23 161 2 733 0 1 7 5 13 8:15 AM 26 141 24 14 90 31 25 240 19 22 195 7 834 1 1 4 5 11 8:30 AM 18 90 20 17 87 17 37 215 27 26 205 5 764 0 2 5 7 14 8:45 AM 32 99 11 20 96 30 22 172 22 23 196 8 731 1 3 4 4 12 VOLUMES 201 857 219 152 644 195 205 1,789 157 183 1,370 45 6,017 3 15 28 41 87 APPROACH % 16% 67% 17% 15% 65% 20% 10% 83% 7% 11% 86% 3% APP/DEPART 1,277 / 1,094 991 / 946 2,151 / 2,186 1,598 / 1,791 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 105 464 109 67 336 115 113 995 72 85 705 22 3,188 APPROACH % 15% 68% 16% 13% 65% 22% 10% 84% 6% 10% 87% 3% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.887 0.925 0.942 0.906 0.956
APP/DEPART 678 / 589 518 / 475 1,180 / 1,184 812 / 940 0 4:00 PM 37 124 40 29 137 39 20 205 20 43 244 5 943 0 10 3 12 25 4:15 PM 21 137 33 23 141 29 32 197 21 65 252 14 965 0 4 4 18 26 4:30 PM 37 152 18 30 142 25 30 224 22 40 296 12 1,028 2 11 6 6 25 4:45 PM 45 143 30 20 148 29 37 235 27 41 258 13 1,026 0 2 5 9 16 5:00 PM 31 172 22 16 157 50 29 217 28 39 314 9 1,084 0 3 5 10 18 5:15 PM 40 195 30 23 161 24 41 191 22 53 270 19 1,069 0 4 5 12 21 5:30 PM 41 148 29 27 124 35 31 233 43 43 333 26 1,113 1 5 5 6 17 5:45 PM 50 169 25 22 130 32 33 228 22 48 267 10 1,036 0 5 3 9 17 VOLUMES 302 1,240 227 190 1,140 263 253 1,730 205 372 2,234 108 8,264 3 44 36 82 165 APPROACH % 17% 70% 13% 12% 72% 17% 12% 79% 9% 14% 82% 4% APP/DEPART 1,769 / 1,609 1,593 / 1,638 2,188 / 2,185 2,714 / 2,832 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 162 684 106 88 572 141 134 869 115 183 1,184 64 4,302 APPROACH % 17% 72% 11% 11% 71% 18% 12% 78% 10% 13% 83% 4% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.898 0.898 0.910 0.890 0.966
APP/DEPART 952 / 881 801 / 834 1,118 / 1,083 1,431 / 1,504 0 Anaheim

NORTH SIDE
Katella WEST SIDE EAST SIDE Katella

SOUTH SIDE
Anaheim
AM
7:30 AM
PM
5:00 PM

U-TURNS
Anaheim Anaheim Katella Katella
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected] Anaheim
Anaheim
Katella
Add U-Turns to Left Turns
Appendix C
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
DRAFT Task 2 – State of the System Report
175
Appendix C - Study Area Intersections AM
and PM Peak Hour Counts

INSERT PDF OF COUNTS
2,584 458 1,784 342 TOTAL 2,703
1,593 263 1,140 190 PM 1,609
991 195 644 152 AM 1,094
1,598 2,714 4,312
4,623 2,832 1,791
45 108 153
1,370 2,234 3,604
TOTAL
PM
AM
183 372 555
458 253 205
AM
PM
TOTAL
3,519 1,730 1,789
362 205 157
2,186 2,185 4,371
4,339 2,188 2,151
946 AM 201 857 219 1,277
1,638 PM 302 1,240 227 1,769
2,584 TOTAL 503 2,097 446 3,046
1,319 256 908 155 TOTAL 1,470
801 141 572 88 PM 881
518 115 336 67 AM 589
812
1,431 2,243
2,444 1,504
940
22 64 86
705
1,184 1,889
TOTAL
PM
AM
AM 7:30 AM
8:45 AM
85 183 268
247 134 113
#N/A
AM
PM
TOTAL
1,864
869 995
PM 5:00 PM
5:45 PM
187 115
72 1,184 1,083 2,267
2,298 1,118 1,180
475 AM 105 464 109 678
834 PM 162 684 106 952
1,309 Total 267 1,148 215 1,630
Anaheim
Anaheim
Anaheim
Katella
Katella

PEAK HOUR
AimTD LLC

TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
Anaheim
Katella
Katella
SC

ALL HOURS
Anaheim
Appendix C
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
DRAFT Task 2 – State of the System Report
175
Appendix C - Study Area Intersections AM
and PM Peak Hour Counts

INSERT PDF OF COUNTS
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC
Tue, Oct 5, 21 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 152
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 10 65 7 36 75 2 16 96 15 24 62 47 455 1 3 0 0 4 7:15 AM 26 78 21 36 94 15 37 140 35 27 57 51 617 12 4 1 0 17 7:30 AM 36 90 27 47 115 9 27 146 44 31 76 34 682 11 2 0 0 13 7:45 AM 30 90 34 37 136 11 28 133 52 48 72 45 716 7 2 2 0 11 8:00 AM 37 83 36 60 127 6 19 130 34 31 74 50 687 8 9 3 0 20 8:15 AM 22 73 23 56 133 10 32 123 22 29 88 48 659 4 7 5 0 16 8:30 AM 19 71 22 40 118 13 45 120 22 35 76 52 633 1 8 12 0 21 8:45 AM 30 77 31 54 119 15 27 87 21 22 91 34 608 8 9 5 0 22 VOLUMES 210 627 201 366 917 81 231 975 245 247 596 361 5,057 52 44 28 0 124 APPROACH % 20% 60% 19% 27% 67% 6% 16% 67% 17% 21% 50% 30% APP/DEPART 1,038 / 1,235 1,364 / 1,461 1,451 / 1,498 1,204 / 863 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 125 336 120 200 511 36 106 532 152 139 310 177 2,744 APPROACH % 22% 58% 21% 27% 68% 5% 13% 67% 19% 22% 50% 28% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.931 0.938 0.910 0.948 0.958
APP/DEPART 581 / 629 747 / 832 790 / 832 626 / 451 0
4:00 PM 51 143 36 74 146 18 43 109 28 55 182 69 954 18 16 2 0 36 4:15 PM 53 126 42 82 184 23 46 119 34 68 187 70 1,034 13 11 5 0 29 4:30 PM 42 115 24 66 149 23 41 105 45 51 217 62 940 10 15 6 1 32 4:45 PM 57 139 28 83 157 15 45 109 42 69 246 68 1,058 12 22 3 0 37 5:00 PM 56 136 35 77 161 17 30 132 41 62 168 58 973 8 6 2 0 16 5:15 PM 47 170 40 98 150 19 32 114 33 57 220 61 1,041 10 13 2 0 25 5:30 PM 70 152 26 90 152 24 44 109 29 54 165 55 970 14 6 5 0 25 5:45 PM 42 133 40 107 138 14 38 95 38 37 142 48 872 9 18 1 0 28 VOLUMES 418 1,114 271 677 1,237 153 319 892 290 453 1,527 491 7,842 94 107 26 1 228 APPROACH % 23% 62% 15% 33% 60% 7% 21% 59% 19% 18% 62% 20% APP/DEPART 1,803 / 2,005 2,067 / 2,073 1,501 / 1,734 2,471 / 2,030 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 230 597 129 348 620 75 151 464 145 242 799 242 4,042 APPROACH % 24% 62% 13% 33% 59% 7% 20% 61% 19% 19% 62% 19% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.930 0.977 0.936 0.837 0.955
APP/DEPART 956 / 1,025 1,043 / 1,051 760 / 894 1,283 / 1,072 0 State College

NORTH SIDE
La Palma WEST SIDE EAST SIDE La Palma

SOUTH SIDE
State College
AM
7:30 AM
PM
4:45 PM

U-TURNS
State College State College La Palma La Palma

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
Anaheim
State College
La Palma
Add U-Turns to Left Turns
Appendix C
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
DRAFT Task 2 – State of the System Report
175
Appendix C - Study Area Intersections AM
and PM Peak Hour Counts

INSERT PDF OF COUNTS
3,431 234 2,154 1,043 TOTAL 3,240
2,067 153 1,237 677 PM 2,005
1,364 81 917 366 AM 1,235
1,204 2,471 3,675
2,893 2,030
863
361 491 852
596
1,527 2,123
TOTAL
PM
AM
247 453 700
550 319 231
AM
PM
TOTAL
1,867
892 975
535 290 245
1,498 1,734 3,232
2,952 1,501 1,451
1,461 AM 210 627 201 1,038
2,073 PM 418 1,114 271 1,803
3,534 TOTAL 628 1,741 472 2,841
1,790 111 1,131 548 TOTAL 1,654
1,043 75 620 348 PM 1,025
747 36 511 200 AM 629
626
1,283 1,909
1,523 1,072
451
177 242 419
310 799
1,109
TOTAL
PM
AM
AM 7:30 AM
8:45 AM
139 242 381
257 151 106
#N/A
AM
PM
TOTAL
996 464 532
PM 4:45 PM
5:45 PM
297 145 152
832 894
1,726
1,550
760 790
832 AM 125 336 120 581
1,051 PM 230 597 129 956
1,883 Total 355 933 249 1,537
State College
State College
State College
La Palma
La Palma

PEAK HOUR
AimTD LLC

TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
State College
La Palma
La Palma
SC

ALL HOURS
Anaheim
Appendix C
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
DRAFT Task 2 – State of the System Report
175
Appendix C - Study Area Intersections AM
and PM Peak Hour Counts

INSERT PDF OF COUNTS
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC
Tue, Oct 5, 21 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 153
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 2 3 1 2 3 0 2 3 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 16 34 8 37 71 10 25 167 9 52 99 10 538 6 1 0 7 14 7:15 AM 20 55 15 41 69 15 23 188 19 63 151 13 672 7 1 0 2 10 7:30 AM 38 96 32 59 116 15 36 180 16 66 151 22 827 4 6 0 2 12 7:45 AM 53 88 22 53 114 15 39 224 20 83 204 14 929 4 2 0 7 13 8:00 AM 46 79 23 52 147 17 34 143 18 69 172 27 827 4 2 0 2 8 8:15 AM 36 84 24 43 127 9 33 133 17 55 172 22 755 4 4 0 4 12 8:30 AM 36 68 15 41 73 12 24 161 11 77 181 21 720 10 2 1 4 17 8:45 AM 31 67 18 51 100 9 28 102 14 58 165 31 674 5 3 1 6 15 VOLUMES 276 571 157 377 817 102 242 1,298 124 523 1,295 160 5,942 44 21 2 34 101 APPROACH % 27% 57% 16% 29% 63% 8% 15% 78% 7% 26% 65% 8% APP/DEPART 1,004 / 992 1,296 / 1,474 1,664 / 1,845 1,978 / 1,631 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 173 347 101 207 504 56 142 680 71 273 699 85 3,338 APPROACH % 28% 56% 16% 27% 66% 7% 16% 76% 8% 26% 66% 8% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.935 0.888 0.789 0.878 0.898
APP/DEPART 621 / 588 767 / 849 893 / 989 1,057 / 912 0
4:00 PM 63 134 28 59 108 15 46 170 20 83 211 42 979 14 6 4 7 31 4:15 PM 67 132 21 67 193 16 33 159 11 80 181 39 999 13 7 1 10 31 4:30 PM 69 149 26 70 148 25 32 165 18 75 181 46 1,004 14 7 0 9 30 4:45 PM 60 113 23 57 145 23 52 194 18 85 224 50 1,044 13 13 0 6 32 5:00 PM 63 116 30 71 128 18 45 178 18 79 217 28 991 10 6 2 1 19 5:15 PM 65 154 24 79 162 23 52 179 17 86 203 39 1,083 9 9 0 5 23 5:30 PM 70 172 23 56 149 21 41 148 23 81 178 45 1,007 13 10 0 4 27 5:45 PM 80 115 35 70 118 19 49 140 14 89 216 35 980 19 13 0 5 37 VOLUMES 537 1,085 210 529 1,151 160 350 1,333 139 658 1,611 324 8,087 105 71 7 47 230 APPROACH % 29% 59% 11% 29% 63% 9% 19% 73% 8% 25% 62% 12% APP/DEPART 1,832 / 1,823 1,840 / 2,006 1,822 / 2,048 2,593 / 2,210 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 258 555 100 263 584 85 190 699 76 331 822 162 4,125 APPROACH % 28% 61% 11% 28% 63% 9% 20% 72% 8% 25% 63% 12% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.861 0.883 0.914 0.916 0.952
APP/DEPART 913 / 943 932 / 1,020 965 / 1,040 1,315 / 1,122 0 State College

NORTH SIDE
Lincoln WEST SIDE EAST SIDE Lincoln

SOUTH SIDE
State College
AM
7:30 AM
PM
4:45 PM

U-TURNS
State College State College Lincoln Lincoln

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
Anaheim
State College
Lincoln
Add U-Turns to Left Turns
Appendix C
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
DRAFT Task 2 – State of the System Report
175
Appendix C - Study Area Intersections AM
and PM Peak Hour Counts

INSERT PDF OF COUNTS
3,136 262 1,968 906 TOTAL 2,815
1,840 160 1,151 529 PM 1,823
1,296 102 817 377 AM 992
1,978 2,593 4,571
3,841 2,210 1,631
160 324 484
1,295 1,611 2,906
TOTAL
PM
AM
523 658
1,181
592 350 242
AM
PM
TOTAL
2,631 1,333 1,298
263 139 124
1,845 2,048 3,893
3,486 1,822 1,664
1,474 AM 276 571 157 1,004
2,006 PM 537 1,085 210 1,832
3,480 TOTAL 813 1,656 367 2,836
1,699 141 1,088 470 TOTAL 1,531
932 85 584 263 PM 943
767 56 504 207 AM 588
1,057 1,315 2,372
2,034 1,122
912
85 162 247
699 822
1,521
TOTAL
PM
AM
AM 7:30 AM
8:45 AM
273 331 604
332 190 142
#N/A
AM
PM
TOTAL
1,379
699 680
PM 4:45 PM
5:45 PM
147
76 71
989
1,040 2,029
1,858
965 893
849 AM 173 347 101 621
1,020 PM 258 555 100 913
1,869 Total 431 902 201 1,534
State College
State College
State College
Lincoln
Lincoln

PEAK HOUR
AimTD LLC

TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
State College
Lincoln
Lincoln
SC

ALL HOURS
Anaheim
Appendix C
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
DRAFT Task 2 – State of the System Report
175
Appendix C - Study Area Intersections AM
and PM Peak Hour Counts

INSERT PDF OF COUNTS
T218
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC
Tue, Nov 2, 21 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 157
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 2 2 1 2 2 0 1 3 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 18 43 16 49 80 30 14 166 36 22 221 21 716 2 6 0 2 10 7:15 AM 22 70 12 61 136 49 36 226 52 24 179 24 891 2 9 0 0 11 7:30 AM 31 88 19 63 133 48 31 222 65 34 213 21 968 1 12 0 1 14 7:45 AM 19 86 24 63 144 62 41 230 88 34 240 19 1,050 2 14 0 1 17 8:00 AM 35 96 14 60 140 61 47 174 54 27 264 21 993 2 10 0 0 12 8:15 AM 31 82 17 74 104 37 38 155 56 35 279 25 933 1 17 0 0 18 8:30 AM 20 36 25 57 102 24 27 156 37 35 287 17 823 3 9 1 1 14 8:45 AM 19 63 21 39 81 21 21 168 45 21 252 20 771 2 9 0 1 12 VOLUMES 195 564 148 466 920 332 255 1,497 433 232 1,935 168 7,145 15 86 1 6 108 APPROACH % 21% 62% 16% 27% 54% 19% 12% 69% 20% 10% 83% 7% APP/DEPART 907 / 1,072 1,718 / 1,594 2,185 / 2,031 2,335 / 2,448 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 116 352 74 260 521 208 157 781 263 130 996 86 3,944 APPROACH % 21% 65% 14% 26% 53% 21% 13% 65% 22% 11% 82% 7% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.934 0.919 0.836 0.894 0.939
APP/DEPART 542 / 648 989 / 918 1,201 / 1,064 1,212 / 1,314 0 4:00 PM 40 125 19 58 112 41 43 247 45 28 266 41 1,065 2 23 0 0 25 4:15 PM 36 138 35 60 110 34 47 243 36 32 252 59 1,082 0 21 1 0 22 4:30 PM 64 126 26 62 99 29 44 255 42 31 240 39 1,057 1 15 1 0 17 4:45 PM 47 147 31 55 111 29 54 198 38 31 254 59 1,054 0 13 0 0 13 5:00 PM 69 136 31 52 82 31 60 238 41 25 274 47 1,086 4 7 0 1 12 5:15 PM 67 151 19 50 98 34 63 222 35 36 258 43 1,076 3 11 0 0 14 5:30 PM 50 125 23 60 107 45 48 220 30 31 296 46 1,081 2 11 1 0 14 5:45 PM 37 131 26 36 94 33 30 143 31 32 266 47 906 1 11 0 0 12 VOLUMES 410 1,079 210 433 813 276 389 1,766 298 246 2,106 381 8,407 13 112 3 1 129 APPROACH % 24% 64% 12% 28% 53% 18% 16% 72% 12% 9% 77% 14% APP/DEPART 1,699 / 1,958 1,522 / 1,369 2,453 / 2,298 2,733 / 2,782 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 233 559 104 217 398 139 225 878 144 123 1,082 195 4,297 APPROACH % 26% 62% 12% 29% 53% 18% 18% 70% 12% 9% 77% 14% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.945 0.889 0.920 0.938 0.989
APP/DEPART 896 / 1,020 754 / 673 1,247 / 1,158 1,400 / 1,446 0 State College

NORTH SIDE
Ball WEST SIDE EAST SIDE Ball

SOUTH SIDE
State College
AM
7:30 AM
PM
4:45 PM

U-TURNS
State College State College Ball Ball
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected] Anaheim
State College
Ball
Add U-Turns to Left Turns
Appendix C
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
DRAFT Task 2 – State of the System Report
175
Appendix C - Study Area Intersections AM
and PM Peak Hour Counts

INSERT PDF OF COUNTS
3,240 608 1,733 899 TOTAL 3,030
1,522 276 813 433 PM 1,958
1,718 332 920 466 AM 1,072
2,335 2,733 5,068
5,230 2,782 2,448
168 381 549
1,935 2,106 4,041
TOTAL
PM
AM
232 246 478
644 389 255
AM
PM
TOTAL
3,263 1,766 1,497
731 298 433
2,031 2,298 4,329
4,638 2,453 2,185
1,594 AM 195 564 148 907
1,369 PM 410 1,079 210 1,699
2,963 TOTAL 605 1,643 358 2,606
1,743 347 919 477 TOTAL 1,668
754 139 398 217 PM 1,020
989 208 521 260 AM 648
1,212 1,400 2,612
2,760 1,446 1,314
86 195 281
996
1,082 2,078
TOTAL
PM
AM
AM 7:30 AM
8:45 AM
130 123 253
382 225 157
#N/A
AM
PM
TOTAL
1,659
878 781
PM 4:45 PM
5:45 PM
407 144 263
1,064 1,158 2,222
2,448 1,247 1,201
918 AM 116 352 74 542
673 PM 233 559 104 896
1,591 Total 349 911 178 1,438
State College
State College
State College
Ball
Ball

PEAK HOUR
AimTD LLC

TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
State College
Ball
Ball
SC

ALL HOURS
Anaheim
Appendix C
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
DRAFT Task 2 – State of the System Report
175
Appendix C - Study Area Intersections AM
and PM Peak Hour Counts

INSERT PDF OF COUNTS
T218
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC
Tue, Nov 2, 21 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 160
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3.5 1.5 2 3 1 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 16 75 26 15 86 20 55 154 17 34 136 4 638 7 0 3 2 12 7:15 AM 32 96 42 23 114 22 46 170 35 29 106 7 722 10 2 6 6 24 7:30 AM 30 113 48 24 148 19 51 192 39 48 114 8 834 13 2 7 6 28 7:45 AM 23 111 44 23 155 25 54 224 42 59 123 15 898 8 0 6 10 24 8:00 AM 26 116 32 18 161 22 50 211 51 68 120 5 880 10 0 4 7 21 8:15 AM 27 119 36 28 159 29 36 207 39 52 128 10 870 9 0 5 6 20 8:30 AM 31 65 30 23 129 26 33 219 35 61 154 11 817 13 0 3 6 22 8:45 AM 27 87 34 21 110 29 49 178 29 57 164 11 796 12 1 4 9 26 VOLUMES 212 782 292 175 1,062 192 374 1,555 287 408 1,045 71 6,455 82 5 38 52 177 APPROACH % 16% 61% 23% 12% 74% 13% 17% 70% 13% 27% 69% 5% APP/DEPART 1,286 / 1,194 1,429 / 1,787 2,216 / 2,069 1,524 / 1,405 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 106 459 160 93 623 95 191 834 171 227 485 38 3,482 APPROACH % 15% 63% 22% 11% 77% 12% 16% 70% 14% 30% 65% 5% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.949 0.939 0.934 0.952 0.969
APP/DEPART 725 / 668 811 / 1,032 1,196 / 1,114 750 / 668 0 4:00 PM 53 105 45 15 161 52 47 152 30 66 248 11 985 9 1 16 10 36 4:15 PM 40 131 41 12 185 40 45 176 42 96 229 16 1,053 10 0 18 7 35 4:30 PM 45 144 53 21 167 52 49 188 31 67 224 14 1,055 9 2 11 6 28 4:45 PM 56 148 38 16 175 36 42 195 30 83 257 10 1,086 21 2 12 11 46 5:00 PM 54 148 36 26 201 45 44 163 37 77 260 16 1,107 9 0 16 12 37 5:15 PM 64 148 31 25 168 38 43 191 42 115 272 19 1,156 13 2 9 13 37 5:30 PM 50 148 43 23 173 38 38 189 39 104 246 11 1,102 14 1 12 5 32 5:45 PM 72 126 50 17 146 35 49 193 30 88 207 12 1,025 20 1 16 14 51 VOLUMES 434 1,098 337 155 1,376 336 357 1,447 281 696 1,943 109 8,569 105 9 110 78 302 APPROACH % 23% 59% 18% 8% 74% 18% 17% 69% 13% 25% 71% 4% APP/DEPART 1,869 / 1,463 1,867 / 2,380 2,085 / 2,008 2,748 / 2,718 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 224 592 148 90 717 157 167 738 148 379 1,035 56 4,451 APPROACH % 23% 61% 15% 9% 74% 16% 16% 70% 14% 26% 70% 4% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.992 0.886 0.954 0.905 0.963
APP/DEPART 964 / 771 964 / 1,260 1,053 / 1,012 1,470 / 1,408 0 State College

NORTH SIDE
Katella WEST SIDE EAST SIDE Katella

SOUTH SIDE
State College
AM
7:30 AM
PM
4:45 PM

U-TURNS
State College State College Katella Katella
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected] Anaheim
State College
Katella
Add U-Turns to Left Turns
Appendix C
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
DRAFT Task 2 – State of the System Report
175
Appendix C - Study Area Intersections AM
and PM Peak Hour Counts

INSERT PDF OF COUNTS
3,296 528 2,438 330 TOTAL 2,657
1,867 336 1,376 155 PM 1,463
1,429 192 1,062 175 AM 1,194
1,524 2,748 4,272
4,123 2,718 1,405
71 109 180
1,045 1,943 2,988
TOTAL
PM
AM
408 696
1,104
731 357 374
AM
PM
TOTAL
3,002 1,447 1,555
568 281 287
2,069 2,008 4,077
4,301 2,085 2,216
1,787 AM 212 782 292 1,286
2,380 PM 434 1,098 337 1,869
4,167 TOTAL 646 1,880 629 3,155
1,775 252 1,340 183 TOTAL 1,439
964 157 717 90 PM 771
811 95 623 93 AM 668
750
1,470 2,220
2,076 1,408
668
38 56 94
485
1,035 1,520
TOTAL
PM
AM
AM 7:30 AM
8:45 AM
227 379 606
358 167 191
#N/A
AM
PM
TOTAL
1,572
738 834
PM 4:45 PM
5:45 PM
319 148 171
1,114 1,012 2,126
2,249 1,053 1,196
1,032 AM 106 459 160 725
1,260 PM 224 592 148 964
2,292 Total 330 1,051 308 1,689
State College
State College
State College
Katella
Katella

PEAK HOUR
AimTD LLC

TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
State College
Katella
Katella
SC

ALL HOURS
Anaheim
Appendix C
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
DRAFT Task 2 – State of the System Report
175
Appendix C - Study Area Intersections AM
and PM Peak Hour Counts

INSERT PDF OF COUNTS
T218
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC
Tue, Oct 5, 21 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 198
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 1 3 0 1 3 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 13 74 2 7 310 43 12 24 13 22 27 2 549 0 0 0 0 0 7:15 AM 17 110 9 12 310 40 17 28 9 22 32 10 616 1 0 0 0 1 7:30 AM 37 110 6 11 326 74 28 23 20 32 38 5 710 0 0 0 0 0 7:45 AM 36 121 5 17 333 73 21 46 19 31 55 3 760 0 0 0 1 1 8:00 AM 34 108 4 23 317 52 24 43 27 32 42 4 710 0 0 0 0 0 8:15 AM 38 139 4 23 286 46 15 33 20 23 33 1 661 0 1 0 0 1 8:30 AM 30 92 6 6 205 33 27 22 14 20 32 3 490 0 0 0 0 0 8:45 AM 34 104 5 24 218 34 12 20 16 20 28 4 519 0 0 0 0 0 VOLUMES 239 858 41 123 2,305 395 156 239 138 202 287 32 5,015 1 1 0 1 3 APPROACH % 21% 75% 4% 4% 82% 14% 29% 45% 26% 39% 55% 6% APP/DEPART 1,138 / 1,047 2,823 / 2,645 533 / 403 521 / 920 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 145 478 19 74 1,262 245 88 145 86 118 168 13 2,841 APPROACH % 23% 74% 3% 5% 80% 15% 28% 45% 27% 39% 56% 4% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.887 0.934 0.848 0.840 0.935
APP/DEPART 642 / 580 1,581 / 1,465 319 / 238 299 / 558 0 4:00 PM 22 187 2 6 207 27 45 54 47 43 53 16 709 0 0 0 0 0 4:15 PM 21 221 0 7 234 31 62 52 49 22 50 7 756 0 1 0 0 1 4:30 PM 19 206 4 7 212 30 65 71 65 33 58 16 786 0 0 0 0 0 4:45 PM 16 204 7 9 186 32 70 56 43 19 50 12 704 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 PM 14 249 4 6 239 29 57 62 57 48 63 27 855 1 0 0 0 1 5:15 PM 21 227 5 5 213 39 40 66 37 34 35 7 729 1 0 0 0 1 5:30 PM 9 222 4 6 221 31 51 48 27 23 42 15 699 0 0 0 0 0 5:45 PM 11 271 2 5 190 25 53 35 29 13 27 14 675 0 0 0 0 0 VOLUMES 133 1,787 28 51 1,702 244 443 444 354 235 378 114 5,913 2 1 0 0 3 APPROACH % 7% 92% 1% 3% 85% 12% 36% 36% 29% 32% 52% 16% APP/DEPART 1,948 / 2,345 1,997 / 2,293 1,241 / 522 727 / 753 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 70 880 15 29 871 122 254 241 214 122 221 62 3,101 APPROACH % 7% 91% 2% 3% 85% 12% 36% 34% 30% 30% 55% 15% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.904 0.932 0.882 0.734 0.907
APP/DEPART 965 / 1,197 1,022 / 1,208 709 / 284 405 / 412 0 Tustin

NORTH SIDE
Miraloma WEST SIDE EAST SIDE Miraloma

SOUTH SIDE
Tustin
AM
7:30 AM
PM
4:15 PM

U-TURNS
Tustin Tustin Miraloma Miraloma
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected] Anaheim
Tustin
Miraloma
Add U-Turns to Left Turns
Appendix C
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
DRAFT Task 2 – State of the System Report
175
Appendix C - Study Area Intersections AM
and PM Peak Hour Counts

INSERT PDF OF COUNTS
4,820 639 4,007 174 TOTAL 3,392
1,997 244 1,702 51 PM 2,345
2,823 395 2,305 123 AM 1,047
521 727
1,248
1,673
753 920
32 114 146
287 378 665
TOTAL
PM
AM
202 235 437
599 443 156
AM
PM
TOTAL
683 444 239
492 354 138
403 522 925
1,774 1,241
533
2,645 AM 239 858 41 1,138
2,293 PM 133 1,787 28 1,948
4,938 TOTAL 372 2,645 69 3,086
2,603 367 2,133 103 TOTAL 1,777
1,022 122 871 29 PM 1,197
1,581 245 1,262 74 AM 580
299 405 704
970 412 558
13 62 75
168 221 389
TOTAL
PM
AM
AM 7:30 AM
8:45 AM
118 122 240
342 254
88 #N/A
AM
PM
TOTAL
386 241 145
PM 4:15 PM
5:45 PM
300 214
86 238 284 522
1,028
709 319
1,465 AM 145 478 19 642
1,208 PM 70 880 15 965
2,673 Total 215 1,358 34 1,607
Tustin
Tustin
Tustin
Miraloma
Miraloma

PEAK HOUR
AimTD LLC

TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
Tustin
Miraloma
Miraloma
SC

ALL HOURS
Anaheim
Appendix C
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
DRAFT Task 2 – State of the System Report
175
Appendix C - Study Area Intersections AM
and PM Peak Hour Counts

INSERT PDF OF COUNTS
T218
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC
Tue, Oct 5, 21 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 199
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 3 3 1 2 4 0 2 3 1 2 3 1 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 97 161 127 4 296 6 8 26 44 126 39 8 942 7 1 1 0 9 7:15 AM 109 214 149 5 376 14 20 32 60 112 37 8 1,136 13 0 4 2 19 7:30 AM 96 207 133 9 346 9 16 57 50 135 88 10 1,156 8 0 1 0 9 7:45 AM 154 225 208 10 350 23 21 65 53 113 87 6 1,315 6 0 4 1 11 8:00 AM 136 237 174 11 337 24 15 46 49 115 71 9 1,224 9 0 4 0 13 8:15 AM 101 198 171 13 307 22 20 58 70 121 67 15 1,163 11 1 7 2 21 8:30 AM 140 218 144 6 236 17 25 46 80 86 64 3 1,065 10 0 10 0 20 8:45 AM 95 193 146 15 240 18 14 36 75 97 62 13 1,004 8 1 3 2 14 VOLUMES 928 1,653 1,252 73 2,488 133 139 366 481 905 515 72 9,005 72 3 34 7 116 APPROACH % 24% 43% 33% 3% 92% 5% 14% 37% 49% 61% 35% 5% APP/DEPART 3,833 / 1,833 2,694 / 3,939 986 / 1,695 1,492 / 1,538 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 487 867 686 43 1,340 78 72 226 222 484 313 40 4,858 APPROACH % 24% 43% 34% 3% 92% 5% 14% 43% 43% 58% 37% 5% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.869 0.954 0.878 0.898 0.924
APP/DEPART 2,040 / 964 1,461 / 2,077 520 / 957 837 / 860 0 4:00 PM 55 246 136 13 324 17 23 122 107 165 106 11 1,325 10 2 3 0 15 4:15 PM 46 243 127 7 315 16 31 140 110 157 106 23 1,321 6 1 2 1 10 4:30 PM 55 226 115 11 320 6 36 146 162 156 151 12 1,396 10 0 6 0 16 4:45 PM 46 251 111 16 302 15 22 111 121 153 106 10 1,264 9 0 4 0 13 5:00 PM 50 238 115 9 315 9 31 171 160 178 150 23 1,449 11 0 5 1 17 5:15 PM 54 260 106 15 332 16 26 195 133 118 112 11 1,378 12 0 5 0 17 5:30 PM 52 266 108 9 291 17 31 144 144 131 90 6 1,289 12 1 9 0 22 5:45 PM 62 290 129 15 220 13 27 137 104 95 59 14 1,165 12 0 5 1 18 VOLUMES 420 2,020 947 95 2,419 109 227 1,166 1,041 1,153 880 110 10,587 82 4 39 3 128 APPROACH % 12% 60% 28% 4% 92% 4% 9% 48% 43% 54% 41% 5%
APP/DEPART 3,387 / 2,322 2,623 / 4,692 2,434 / 2,207 2,143 / 1,366 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 205 975 447 51 1,269 46 115 623 576 605 519 56 5,487 APPROACH % 13% 60% 27% 4% 93% 3% 9% 47% 44% 51% 44% 5%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.968 0.941 0.907 0.840 0.947
APP/DEPART 1,627 / 1,126 1,366 / 2,491 1,314 / 1,122 1,180 / 748 0 Tustin

NORTH SIDE
La Palma WEST SIDE EAST SIDE La Palma

SOUTH SIDE
Tustin
AM
7:30 AM
PM
4:30 PM

U-TURNS
Tustin Tustin La Palma La Palma
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected] Anaheim
Tustin
La Palma
Add U-Turns to Left Turns
Appendix C
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
DRAFT Task 2 – State of the System Report
175
Appendix C - Study Area Intersections AM
and PM Peak Hour Counts

INSERT PDF OF COUNTS
5,317 242 4,907 168 TOTAL 4,155
2,623 109 2,419 95 PM 2,322
2,694 133 2,488 73 AM 1,833
1,492 2,143 3,635
2,904 1,366 1,538
72 110 182
515 880
1,395
TOTAL
PM
AM
905
1,153 2,058
366 227 139
AM
PM
TOTAL
1,532 1,166
366
1,522 1,041
481
1,695 2,207 3,902
3,420 2,434
986
3,939 AM 928 1,653 1,252 3,833
4,692 PM 420 2,020 947 3,387
8,631 TOTAL 1,348 3,673 2,199 7,220
2,827 124 2,609 94 TOTAL 2,090
1,366 46 1,269 51 PM 1,126
1,461 78 1,340 43 AM 964
837
1,180 2,017
1,608
748 860
40 56 96
313 519 832
TOTAL
PM
AM
AM 7:30 AM
8:45 AM
484 605
1,089
187 115
72 #N/A
AM
PM
TOTAL
849 623 226
PM 4:30 PM
5:45 PM
798 576 222
957
1,122 2,079
1,834 1,314
520
2,077 AM 487 867 686 2,040
2,491 PM 205 975 447 1,627
4,568 Total 692 1,842 1,133 3,667
Tustin
Tustin
Tustin
La Palma
La Palma

PEAK HOUR
AimTD LLC

TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
Tustin
La Palma
La Palma
SC

ALL HOURS
Anaheim
Appendix C
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
DRAFT Task 2 – State of the System Report
175
Appendix C - Study Area Intersections AM
and PM Peak Hour Counts

INSERT PDF OF COUNTS
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC
Tue, Oct 5, 21 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 220
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 2 3 2 2 4 1 2 2.5 1.5 2 3 1 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 90 218 44 24 356 31 8 14 45 107 34 17 988 1 0 1 0 2 7:15 AM 89 254 81 29 367 52 14 25 40 169 49 45 1,214 0 0 4 1 5 7:30 AM 115 384 80 49 414 40 20 30 50 148 77 78 1,485 1 0 4 0 5 7:45 AM 133 289 86 66 466 111 24 45 73 152 108 64 1,617 0 0 1 1 2 8:00 AM 169 261 80 39 356 109 50 41 112 142 98 30 1,487 0 0 3 0 3 8:15 AM 141 287 96 31 444 81 42 46 87 140 60 30 1,485 0 0 3 0 3 8:30 AM 103 291 98 29 350 49 32 38 60 129 54 35 1,268 0 0 0 0 0 8:45 AM 145 282 96 28 272 48 27 34 54 113 62 32 1,193 0 0 3 0 3 VOLUMES 985 2,266 661 295 3,025 521 217 273 521 1,100 542 331 10,737 2 0 19 2 23 APPROACH % 25% 58% 17% 8% 79% 14% 21% 27% 52% 56% 27% 17% APP/DEPART 3,912 / 2,795 3,841 / 4,646 1,011 / 1,231 1,973 / 2,065 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 558 1,221 342 185 1,680 341 136 162 322 582 343 202 6,074 APPROACH % 26% 58% 16% 8% 76% 15% 22% 26% 52% 52% 30% 18% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.916 0.858 0.764 0.870 0.939
APP/DEPART 2,121 / 1,548 2,206 / 2,584 620 / 690 1,127 / 1,252 0 4:00 PM 100 338 225 68 227 47 70 152 137 112 65 45 1,586 0 0 3 0 3 4:15 PM 84 396 255 88 294 52 66 136 108 108 62 60 1,709 0 0 1 0 1 4:30 PM 91 354 235 69 267 49 53 162 123 105 61 59 1,628 1 0 1 1 3 4:45 PM 105 446 237 66 276 42 68 181 121 91 62 45 1,740 0 0 3 1 4 5:00 PM 62 390 235 58 297 58 67 167 136 107 47 54 1,678 0 0 1 0 1 5:15 PM 68 367 231 76 294 63 77 162 110 120 55 64 1,687 0 0 2 1 3 5:30 PM 85 440 238 69 263 59 52 205 119 87 42 38 1,697 1 0 0 0 1 5:45 PM 79 401 234 79 292 57 40 144 92 115 67 36 1,636 1 1 1 2 5 VOLUMES 674 3,132 1,890 573 2,210 427 493 1,309 946 845 461 401 13,361 3 1 12 5 21 APPROACH % 12% 55% 33% 18% 69% 13% 18% 48% 34% 50% 27% 23% APP/DEPART 5,696 / 4,015 3,210 / 3,999 2,748 / 3,776 1,707 / 1,571 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 320 1,643 941 269 1,130 222 264 715 486 405 206 201 6,802 APPROACH % 11% 57% 32% 17% 70% 14% 18% 49% 33% 50% 25% 25% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.921 0.936 0.974 0.849 0.977
APP/DEPART 2,904 / 2,102 1,621 / 2,020 1,465 / 1,927 812 / 753 0 Imperial

NORTH SIDE
La Palma WEST SIDE EAST SIDE La Palma

SOUTH SIDE
Imperial

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
Anaheim
Imperial
La Palma

U-TURNS
Imperial Imperial La Palma La Palma
AM
7:30 AM
PM
4:45 PM
Add U-Turns to Left Turns
Appendix C
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
DRAFT Task 2 – State of the System Report
175
Appendix C - Study Area Intersections AM
and PM Peak Hour Counts

INSERT PDF OF COUNTS
7,051 948 5,235 868 TOTAL 6,810
3,210 427 2,210 573 PM 4,015
3,841 521 3,025 295 AM 2,795
1,973 1,707 3,680
3,636 1,571 2,065
331 401 732
542 461
1,003
TOTAL
PM
AM
1,100
845
1,945
710 493 217
AM
PM
TOTAL
1,582 1,309
273
1,467
946 521
1,231 3,776 5,007
3,759 2,748 1,011
4,646 AM 985 2,266 661 3,912
3,999 PM 674 3,132 1,890 5,696
8,645 TOTAL 1,659 5,398 2,551 9,608
3,827 563 2,810 454 TOTAL 3,650
1,621 222 1,130 269 PM 2,102
2,206 341 1,680 185 AM 1,548
1,127
812
1,939
2,005
753
1,252
202 201 403
343 206 549
TOTAL
PM
AM
AM 7:30 AM
8:45 AM
582 405 987
400 264 136
#N/A
AM
PM
TOTAL
877 715 162
PM 4:45 PM
5:45 PM
808 486 322
690
1,927 2,617
2,085 1,465
620
2,584 AM 558 1,221 342 2,121
2,020 PM 320 1,643 941 2,904
4,604 Total 878 2,864 1,283 5,025
AimTD LLC

TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
Imperial
La Palma
La Palma
SC

ALL HOURS
Anaheim
Imperial
Imperial
Imperial
La Palma
La Palma

PEAK HOUR
Appendix C
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix D
Appendix D - Existing Transit Stops by Monthly
Boardings (April 2024)
Rank
Bus Stop
Stops denoted by * are located outside Anaheim city
limits
Direction
ATN
Stop
ID
OCTA
Stop
ID
Total Monthly
Boardings
1 Disneyland Main Transportation Center N/A - - 48,754
2 Harbor - East Shuttle Area SB 247 8,756
3 ARTIC N/A - - 8,676
4 Embassy South, Hilton Garden & Hampton
GG* N/A 6019 7,234
5 Harbor & La Palma SB 234 7,110
6 Harbor & Katella SB 2001 250 6,959
7 Anaheim & Katella NB 2033 5 6,678
8 Harbor & East Shuttle Area NB 218 6,575
9 Delta, Marriott & Homewood Suites GG* N/A 6018 6,507
10 Harbor & Katella NB 3009 216 6,489
11 Harbor & Lincoln SB 240 6,432
12 Lincoln & State College WB 486 6,051
13 Katella & Harbor WB 4001 283 5,694
14 Katella & Harbor EB 2019 268 5,615
15 Beach & Lincoln SB 111 5,514
16 State College & La Palma SB 667 5,225
17 Katella & Anaheim WB 2038 281 5,195
18 La Palma & State College WB 4008 402 4,809
19 Worldmark Anaheim N/A 3014 4,192
20 Harbor & Lincoln NB 225 4,161
21 Euclid & Ball NB 184 4,158
22 State College & Lincoln SB 670 4,137
23 State College & Katella NB 645 4,034
24 Katella & State College WB 278 3,789
25 Convention & Marriott Bus Dock EB 2039 3,732
26 The Viv Hotel N/A 3022 3,719
27 La Palma & Euclid EB 328 3,698
28 Lincoln & Harbor WB 494 3,691
29 Hotel Fera* N/A 134 3,662
30 Euclid & Crescent SB 202 3,645
31 Katella & Haster EB 270 3,631
32 Lincoln & Euclid WB 501 3,608
33 La Palma & Lemon EB 333 3,474
34 Harbor & Chapman NB 212 3,461
35 Beach & Lincoln NB 110 3,433
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix D
Rank
Bus Stop
Stops denoted by * are located outside Anaheim city
limits
Direction
ATN
Stop
ID
OCTA
Stop
ID
Total Monthly
Boardings
36 Anaheim & Lincoln SB 24 3,413
37 Harbor & Orangewood NB 3003 214 3,292
38 Beach & Ball SB 116 3,264
38 La Palma & Harbor EB 332 3,264
40 State College & Ball NB 649 3,212
41 Euclid & Katella NB 179 3,160
42 Katella & Euclid EB 262 3,094
43 Euclid & Ball SB 207 3,082
44 Lincoln & Beach WB 513 3,054
45 Anaheim & Ball SB 32 3,028
46 Euclid & Lincoln SB 203 2,933
47 Lincoln & Euclid EB 461 2,923
48 Katella & Euclid WB 288 2,836
49 State College & Lincoln NB 658 2,804
50 Lincoln & East WB 489 2,766
51 State College & Romneya SB 666 2,726
52 Beach & Ball NB 106 2,651
53 Sonesta Hotels N/A 2010 2,648
54 State College & Katella SB 682 2,644
55 Harbor & Ball SB 246 2,622
56 Euclid & La Palma SB 199 2,606
57 State College & Ball SB 678 2,599
58 La Palma & Kraemer WB 393 2,511
59 La Palma & Harbor WB 412 2,493
60 Lincoln & Knott EB 445 2,477
61 Lincoln & Gilbert EB 455 2,421
62 Clementine Hotel N/A 2021 2,419
63 Harbor & Ball NB 219 2,387
64 Lincoln & West EB 465 2,333
65 Harbor & La Palma NB 231 2,331
66 La Palma & State College EB 5012 342 2,279
67 Lincoln & Harbor EB 468 2,267
68 Ball & State College WB 76 2,209
69 La Palma & Acacia WB 404 2,203
70 Great Wolf Lodge & Garden Grove* N/A 6045 2,188
71 Residence Inn Garden Grove* N/A 6012 2,163
72 Euclid & Lincoln NB 189 2,156
73 Ball & Euclid WB 89 2,133
74 Katella & State College EB 273 2,115
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix D
Rank
Bus Stop
Stops denoted by * are located outside Anaheim city
limits
Direction
ATN
Stop
ID
OCTA
Stop
ID
Total Monthly
Boardings
75 State College & Santa Ana SB 671 2,109
76 Anaheim & Cerritos SB 35 2,086
77 Lincoln & Brookhurst EB 457 2,068
78 Peacock & Candlewood N/A 3013 2,060
79 Ball & Beach EB 47 2,048
80 Anaheim & Ball NB 8 2,046
81 Lincoln & Rio Vista WB 483 2,043
82 Clarion Hotel & Convention Way N/A 2007 2,023
83 La Palma & Euclid WB 417 1,969
84 Kraemer & La Palma SB 318 1,953
85 Lincoln & State College EB 476 1,940
86 State College & Via Burton SB 665 1,936
87 Ball & Euclid EB 58 1,892
88 Harbor & Convention NB 3004 215 1,856
89 Haster & Orangewood NB 2 1,847
90 Lincoln & Anaheim WB 491 1,827
91 Euclid & Cerritos NB 182 1,787
92 Ball & Harbor WB 83 1,783
93 Harbor & Orangewood SB 252 1,773
93 La Palma & Magnolia EB 321 1,773
95 La Palma & Citron EB 331 1,708
96 State College & Wagner NB 652 1,704
97 Harbor & Broadway SB 2015 241 1,670
98 State College & Wagner SB 676 1,658
99 Harbor & Vermont NB 220 1,609
100 Haster & Orangewood SB 38 1,606
101 State College & La Palma NB 661 1,580
102 Katella & Brookhurst WB 292 1,561
103 Anaheim & Cerritos NB 6 1,549
104 Harbor & Vermont SB 245 1,545
105 Lincoln & Magnolia EB 453 1,541
106 Haster & Wakefield NB 3 1,538
107 Brookhurst & Lincoln SB 139 1,518
108 Lincoln & Gilbert WB 507 1,495
109 Magnolia & Lincoln SB 535 1,493
110 La Palma & Brookhurst EB 324 1,478
111 Lincoln & Beach EB 449 1,460
112 Anaheim & Broadway SB 25 1,446
113 Beach & Orange SB 114 1,398
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix D
Rank
Bus Stop
Stops denoted by * are located outside Anaheim city
limits
Direction
ATN
Stop
ID
OCTA
Stop
ID
Total Monthly
Boardings
114 Lincoln & Anaheim EB 470 1,373
115 Lincoln & La Plaza WB 488 1,370
116 Element & Suncoast N/A 6024 1,355
117 Lincoln & Brookhurst WB 505 1,341
118 Tustin & La Palma SB 692 1,330
119 Ball & Knott EB 42 1,327
120 Ball & Cast EB 4004 63 1,321
121 Ball & Anaheim WB 81 1,319
122 La Palma & West EB 330 1,314
123 Katella & Casa Vista EB 5001 265 1,300
124 Euclid & Crescent NB 190 1,291
125 Lincoln & Citron EB 467 1,286
126 Magnolia & La Palma SB 531 1,280
127 La Palma & East WB 406 1,276
128 Brookhurst & Ball SB 143 1,267
129 Lincoln & Western EB 447 1,249
130 Euclid & Romneya SB 197 1,237
131 Holiday Inn & Walnut Street N/A 3008 1,233
132 Lincoln & Dale EB 451 1,217
133 La Palma & Tustin WB 388 1,204
134 La Palma & Lemon WB 411 1,197
135 Brookhurst & Crescent SB 137 1,192
136 Brookhurst & La Palma SB 136 1,172
137 La Palma & East EB 338 1,159
138 Ball & Magnolia EB 51 1,157
139 Harbor & Romneya SB 233 1,153
140 La Palma & Gilbert EB 323 1,149
141 Katella & West EB 5003 266 1,131
142 Ball & Brookhurst EB 54 1,129
143 State College & South SB 673 1,095
144 Lincoln & West WB 497 1,089
145 Lincoln & Westchester EB 446 1,084
146 State College & Westport NB 657 1,083
147 Katella & Disneyland WB 40 285 1,079
148 Lincoln & Citron WB 496 1,073
149 Harbor & Wilken NB 213 1,064
150 Lincoln & Magnolia WB 509 1,059
151 Lincoln & East EB 473 1,057
152 Lincoln & Crescent WB 502 1,049
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix D
Rank
Bus Stop
Stops denoted by * are located outside Anaheim city
limits
Direction
ATN
Stop
ID
OCTA
Stop
ID
Total Monthly
Boardings
153 Knott & Orange SB 302 1,038
154 Haster & Wakefield SB 37 1,036
155 Ball & Webster EB 52 1,023
156 Ball & Walnut EB 4003 61 1,006
157 Ball & Brookhurst WB 93 1,004
158 Anaheim & Center Street Promenade NB 3010 15 992
159 Euclid & La Palma NB 193 989
160 State College & Orangewood NB 643 968
161 Brookhurst & Katella NB 120 965
162 Katella & Clementine WB 3015 282 964
163 Ball & Anaheim EB 66 957
164 Ball & Dale EB 49 951
165 Euclid & Broadway SB 204 950
166 Beach & Orange NB 108 939
167 Orangethorpe & Lemon EB 562 934
168 Magnolia & Ball NB 518 933
169 La Palma & Imperial WB 378 931
170 Anaheim & Vermont SB 30 902
171 Euclid & Glenoaks SB 201 901
172 Kraemer & Coronado NB 308 895
173 Brookhurst & Ball NB 124 879
174 Anaheim & Sycamore SB 23 863
175 Anaheim & Vermont NB 10 847
176 Ball & Lemon WB 82 844
177 Ball & Trident EB 57 834
178 La Palma & Miraloma WB 398 831
179 Lincoln & Evergreen WB 487 815
180 La Palma & West WB 414 810
181 Ball & Ox WB 84 808
182 Anaheim Convention Center Grand Plaza N/A 2008 802
182 Harbor & Carl Karcher NB 232 802
184 La Palma & Kraemer EB 348 795
185 La Palma & Citron WB 413 792
186 State College & Vermont SB 675 783
187 Ball & Loara EB 59 782
188 Ball & Harbor EB 64 778
189 State College & Orange Center NB 5604 761
190 Euclid & Cerritos SB 209 759
191 Anaheim & La Verne SB 20 743
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix D
Rank
Bus Stop
Stops denoted by * are located outside Anaheim city
limits
Direction
ATN
Stop
ID
OCTA
Stop
ID
Total Monthly
Boardings
192 La Palma & Red Gum WB 395 728
193 La Palma & Anna EB 340 718
194 Magnolia & Ball SB 539 711
195 Anaheim & North SB 21 705
196 Orangethorpe & Raymond WB 592 702
197 Harbor & South SB 244 700
198 Lincoln & Western WB 515 697
199 Ball & Lewis WB 79 692
200 Harbor & South NB 221 680
201 Harbor & North SB 236 674
201 La Palma & Miller WB 390 674
201 State College & South NB 655 674
204 La Palma & Fairview EB 325 673
204 Stanford Inn N/A 2004 673
206 Ball & Gilbert EB 53 670
207 Katella & Nutwood WB 290 669
208 La Palma & Baxter WB 403 664
209 Euclid & Broadway NB 187 663
210 La Palma & Lakeview WB 383 662
210 La Palma & Tustin EB 355 662
212 Harbor & Santa Ana SB 242 653
213 State College & Placentia NB 662 651
214 Ball & Walnut WB 86 648
214 Best Western Stovall's Inn N/A 5002 648
216 Ball & West EB 4006 62 647
217 La Palma & Brookhurst WB 420 646
218 Orangethorpe & Kraemer WB 590 645
219 La Palma & Magnolia WB 423 638
220 Lincoln & Sunkist WB 484 634
221 Knott & Orange NB 296 632
222 Doubletree Anaheim N/A 2003 631
222 La Palma & Claudina EB 334 631
224 Ball & Sunkist WB 74 628
225 State College & Orangethorpe NB 664 625
226 Katella & 9th EB 264 624
227 Lincoln & Kingsley WB 481 622
228 Harbor & Convention SB 251 614
229 Brookhurst & Lincoln NB 129 613
230 Ball & Western EB 44 609
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix D
Rank
Bus Stop
Stops denoted by * are located outside Anaheim city
limits
Direction
ATN
Stop
ID
OCTA
Stop
ID
Total Monthly
Boardings
231 Lincoln & Empire EB 458 607
232 Katella & Auburn WB 233 279 606
233 Katella & Clementine EB 2034 269 604
234 State College & Vermont NB 653 602
235 Harbor & Wilken SB 253 601
236 Anaheim & Santa Ana SB 26 600
236 Harbor & Broadway NB 224 600
238 Katella & Carnelian EB 263 599
239 Alo & Ayres Hotels* N/A 4016 596
239 La Palma & Olive WB 408 596
241 Orangethorpe & Kellogg WB 585 595
242 Ball & Flore WB 4023 85 590
243 Lincoln & Olive WB 490 583
244 Metrolink Station Anaheim Canyon N/A 4012 577
245 Anaheim & Wilhelmina SB 22 575
246 Lincoln & Peregrine WB 485 574
246 Lincoln & Westchester WB 516 574
248 Anaheim & South SB 28 573
249 Ball & Gaymont EB 8145 571
250 Ball & Magnolia WB 97 567
251 Ball & Trident WB 90 557
252 Anaheim & Lincoln NB 16 556
253 Lincoln & Monterey EB 8128 554
254 Lincoln & Lemon WB 493 546
255 Kraemer & Orangethorpe NB 311 542
256 Four Points Sheraton Anaheim N/A 4005 541
257 Sheraton Park N/A 2006 532
258 Lincoln & Peregrine EB 477 530
259 Lincoln & La Plaza EB 474 526
259 Manchester & Orangewood SB 6041 8352 526
261 Anaheim & Winston SB 33 525
261 La Palma & Manassero WB 382 525
261 Lincoln & Crescent EB 460 525
264 La Palma & Fountain WB 4007 389 511
265 La Palma & Ocean WB 391 501
266 Euclid & Orangewood NB 178 500
267 Lincoln & Grand EB 448 497
268 Haster & Katella NB 4 494
269 La Palma & Laguna EB 329 489
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix D
Rank
Bus Stop
Stops denoted by * are located outside Anaheim city
limits
Direction
ATN
Stop
ID
OCTA
Stop
ID
Total Monthly
Boardings
270 Lincoln & Clementine EB 469 488
271 La Palma & Onondaga EB 327 484
272 Brookhurst & Orange SB 140 483
273 Katella & Convention Center WB 148 284 479
274 Lincoln & Stinson EB 452 478
275 Ball & Loara WB 88 473
276 Lemon & Orangethorpe* NB 430 468
277 Katella & 9th WB 287 467
278 La Palma & Anaheim Shores WB 419 466
278 State College & Via Burton NB 663 466
280 Anaheim & Lorraine NB 9 459
281 State College & Orangewood SB 684 456
282 Anaheim & South NB 11 454
282 Ball & Beach WB 101 454
284 Anaheim & Palais NB 7 449
285 Lemon & La Palma NB 410 446
286 Ball & Empire EB 55 444
287 Lincoln & Claudina EB 471 443
288 Anaheim & Lorraine SB 31 438
289 Ball & Gilbert WB 95 435
290 Tustin & Riverdale SB 694 430
291 La Palma & Olive EB 335 425
292 Ball & Belhaven WB 75 422
292 Lincoln & Bel Air EB 450 422
294 Lincoln & La Reina WB 510 419
295 Katella & Walnut WB 286 417
296 Anaheim & Commercial SB 432 413
297 Lincoln & Gain EB 454 412
298 Magnolia & Broadway SB 536 407
299 Brookhurst & Crescent NB 131 406
299 La Palma & Pauline EB 336 406
301 Anaheim & Sycamore NB 17 405
302 Ball & Webster WB 96 401
302 Beach & Stonybrook SB 115 401
302 Lincoln & Aladdin WB 504 401
305 Euclid & Orange SB 205 399
306 La Palma & Onondaga WB 418 398
307 Katella & Lewis WB 280 396
308 Harbor & Sycamore NB 227 393
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix D
Rank
Bus Stop
Stops denoted by * are located outside Anaheim city
limits
Direction
ATN
Stop
ID
OCTA
Stop
ID
Total Monthly
Boardings
308 Tustin & Santa Ana Canyon SB 695 393
310 Knott & Ball NB 294 385
311 Ball & Nutwood WB 91 384
312 Ball & Nutwood EB 56 382
313 La Palma & Fee Ana WB 384 381
314 Brookhurst & Crestwood SB 146 379
315 Knott & Savanna SB 303 370
316 Brookhurst & Woodley SB 138 368
317 Lincoln & Anaheim WB 491 366
318 State College & Chelsea SB 672 361
319 La Palma & Chantilly WB 397 355
320 Kraemer & Frontera SB 319 352
321 Brookhurst & Colchester SB 142 351
322 Embassy Suites North N/A 5019 347
323 Magnolia & Cerritos NB 7143 345
324 Lincoln & Monterey WB 8129 344
325 Harbor & Sycamore SB 238 343
326 Beach & Rome NB 107 342
327 Euclid & Glenoaks NB 191 339
327 Knott & Ball SB 304 339
329 Euclid & Romneya NB 194 338
330 Euclid & Crone NB 185 337
331 State College & Gene Autry SB 683 336
332 Ball & State College EB 71 331
333 Katella & Howell WB 277 328
334 Haster & Cliffwood SB 39 326
334 Lincoln & Muller EB 459 326
336 Orangethorpe & State College EB 565 317
337 Lincoln & Olive EB 472 315
338 La Palma & Sunkist EB 344 313
339 Hotel Lulu N/A 3005 312
340 Katella & Humor WB 289 308
341 La Palma & Kellogg WB 381 307
342 Lincoln & Grand WB 514 300
343 La Palma & Pauline WB 407 297
344 Brookhurst & Cerritos SB 144 296
344 Lincoln & Rio Vista EB 479 296
346 Magnolia & Lincoln NB 522 295
346 Tustin & La Palma NB 687 295
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix D
Rank
Bus Stop
Stops denoted by * are located outside Anaheim city
limits
Direction
ATN
Stop
ID
OCTA
Stop
ID
Total Monthly
Boardings
348 Magnolia & Winston SB 540 294
349 Anaheim & North NB 19 292
349 Anaheim & Wilhelmina NB 18 292
351 La Palma & Shepard EB 4018 350 289
352 Euclid & Crone SB 206 288
352 Harbor & Santa Ana NB 4010 223 288
354 Ball & Empire WB 92 285
354 Euclid & Orange NB 186 285
356 Ball & Hampstead EB 60 282
356 Harbor & Water SB 243 282
358 Anaheim & Water SB 27 281
359 Knott & Del Monte SB 300 278
359 La Palma & Liberty WB 405 278
361 State College & Cerritos SB 680 275
362 Lincoln & Muller WB 503 267
363 State College & Winston SB 679 265
364 Magnolia & Woodland SB 530 260
365 Euclid & Palais NB 183 258
365 La Palma & Gilbert WB 421 258
367 Lincoln & Dale WB 511 257
368 Brookhurst & Orange NB 127 255
368 Euclid & Cris NB 181 255
370 Katella & Tiara WB 8326 252
371 Anaheim & Water NB 12 251
371 La Palma & Wescom Corporate Center WB 379 251
373 Kraemer & Coronado SB 317 249
373 La Quinta & Extended Stay N/A 2020 249
375 Ball & Lewis EB 68 244
375 Euclid & Chalet SB 208 244
375 Knott & Olinda SB 301 244
378 La Palma & Richfield WB 385 243
379 La Palma & Lido WB 415 242
380 Harbor & North NB 229 235
381 La Palma & Armando WB 394 234
382 La Palma & Blue Gum WB 396 233
383 La Palma & Van Buren WB 386 232
384 State College & Underhill NB 659 228
384 State College & Underhill SB 669 228
386 Beach & Youth Center SB 112 226
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix D
Rank
Bus Stop
Stops denoted by * are located outside Anaheim city
limits
Direction
ATN
Stop
ID
OCTA
Stop
ID
Total Monthly
Boardings
387 Brookhurst & Stoneybrook SB 141 224
388 Brookhurst & La Palma NB 132 222
389 La Palma & Brasher WB 380 221
390 Lincoln & Kingsley EB 480 218
391 Ball & Macduff EB 50 217
392 Ball & East WB 77 214
392 State College & Cerritos NB 647 214
394 State College & Clifpark SB 677 212
395 Ayres Anaheim & Sports Venues N/A 2024 208
396 Ball & Perdido WB 94 206
397 Brookhurst & Cerritos NB 122 204
397 Euclid & Medical Center SB 196 204
397 La Palma & Imperial EB 365 204
400 State College & Orange Center* SB 5017 203
401 Haster & Katella SB 36 202
402 Ball & Dale WB 99 201
402 Harbor & Water NB 222 201
404 Magnolia & Winston NB 517 200
405 Magnolia & Greenleaf SB 532 199
405 Magnolia & Orange NB 520 199
407 Magnolia & Orange SB 537 196
408 La Palma & Mayflower EB 322 194
409 Ball & Fremont EB 41 193
409 Brookhurst & Brookmore NB 125 193
411 Euclid & Medical Center NB 195 190
411 Knott & Rome NB 295 190
413 State College & Redwood SB 668 188
414 La Palma & Buttonwood EB 339 181
415 La Palma & Anaheim WB 409 179
416 Brookhurst & Broadway NB 128 176
416 Katella & Lewis EB 271 176
416 Orangethorpe & Kraemer EB 567 176
419 Euclid & Cris SB 210 175
419 La Palma & Chantilly EB 345 175
421 Dale & Lincoln NB 158 170
421 Knott & Danbrook NB 297 170
423 La Palma & Woodland WB 424 169
424 Ball & Hampstead WB 87 168
425 Ball & Knott WB 105 167
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix D
Rank
Bus Stop
Stops denoted by * are located outside Anaheim city
limits
Direction
ATN
Stop
ID
OCTA
Stop
ID
Total Monthly
Boardings
426 Brookhurst & Catalina NB 130 165
427 Magnolia & Crescent SB 533 164
428 Haster & Tiller SB 40 163
429 Anaheim & Broadway NB 14 162
430 Courtyard Anaheim Theme Park N/A 5016 161
431 Lincoln & Loara WB 500 159
432 Tustin & Miraloma SB 690 157
433 Lincoln & Loara EB 462 154
433 Orangethorpe & Ent 301 EMPI WB 594 154
435 Magnolia & Broadway NB 521 150
436 Manchester Duo N/A 3023 149
437 Lincoln & Gain WB 508 146
438 Ball & Claremont EB 65 143
438 La Palma & Baxter EB 341 143
440 Anaheim & Santa Ana NB 13 139
441 Ball & Masters EB 43 138
442 Euclid & Ord NB 177 135
443 Ball & Sunkist EB 73 134
443 Dale & Crescent SB 159 134
445 Katella & Market EB 272 132
446 Knott & Thornton SB 305 129
447 Ball & Phoenix Club WB 5114 128
447 Orangethorpe & Community WB 591 128
449 Euclid & Sallie SB 211 127
450 Ball & Courtright EB 45 125
451 La Palma & Whittier WB 400 122
452 Towneplace Suites Anaheim N/A 4020 121
453 Lemon & Commercial NB 428 120
454 Ball & Gaymont WB 8146 119
454 Lemon & Carl Karcher SB 433 119
456 Lincoln & Bel Air WB 512 118
457 State College & Howell NB 646 116
458 Chapman & Somerset WB 153 113
459 La Palma & Whittier EB 343 112
460 Lincoln & Sunkist EB 478 111
461 Brookhurst & Crestwood NB 121 110
462 Howard Johnson Anaheim N/A 3011 108
463 Knott & Del Monte NB 298 106
464 State College & Winston NB 648 105
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix D
Rank
Bus Stop
Stops denoted by * are located outside Anaheim city
limits
Direction
ATN
Stop
ID
OCTA
Stop
ID
Total Monthly
Boardings
465 Ball & Sherrill WB 98 104
466 Ball & Halliday EB 46 102
467 Orangethorpe & Orangethorpe Park WB 593 101
468 Ball & Western WB 103 96
469 Walnut & Katella Ave NB - - 95
470 Euclid & Sallie NB 180 94
470 Katella & Dallas WB 291 94
470 La Palma & Arbor WB 416 94
473 Orangethorpe & Willow Woods WB 582 93
473 State College & Turin NB 651 93
475 Orangethorpe & Crowther WB 587 90
476 Brookhurst & Niobe NB 126 89
477 Katella & Howell EB 274 88
478 Magnolia & La Palma NB 526 82
479 Ball & Belhaven EB 72 81
480 Kraemer & Miraloma NB 309 80
481 Wyndham Anaheim N/A 4014 72
482 Lemon & Orangefair* NB 429 71
483 Beach & Youth Center NB 109 69
484 Orangethorpe & Ent 400 RSI Home EB 563 67
485 Ball & Halliday WB 102 66
486 Magnolia & Stonybrook SB 538 64
487 State College & Howell SB 681 60
488 Magnolia & Crescent NB 524 59
488 Magnolia & Madison SB 534 59
490 La Palma & Red Gum EB 347 57
491 Knott & Thornton NB 293 55
491 Orangethorpe & Kellogg EB 575 55
493 Brookhurst & Palais NB 123 52
493 Kraemer & La Jolla NB 310 52
493 La Palma & Miller EB 352 52
496 State College & Redwood NB 660 48
497 Orangethorpe & Lakeview EB 573 46
498 Lincoln & Evergreen EB 475 45
499 Tustin & Valley Forge NB 686 43
499 Vermont & Olive N/A 4009 43
501 Magnolia & Stonybrook NB 519 42
501 Miraloma & Grove WB 7905 42
503 La Palma & Mayflower WB 422 40
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix D
Rank
Bus Stop
Stops denoted by * are located outside Anaheim city
limits
Direction
ATN
Stop
ID
OCTA
Stop
ID
Total Monthly
Boardings
504 Miller & Miraloma NB 545 39
504 Tustin & Santa Ana Canyon NB 685 39
506 Dale & Tyler SB 160 35
506 La Palma & Blue Gum EB 346 35
508 La Palma & Grove EB 4011 353 34
508 La Palma & Link EB 721 34
510 La Palma & Fairview EB 325 31
510 La Palma & Wescom Corporate Center EB 364 31
512 La Palma & Manassero EB 361 29
512 Lemon & Freedom NB 431 29
514 Ball & East WB 77 28
514 Kraemer & Frontera NB 306 28
516 Kraemer & La Jolla SB 315 27
516 La Palma & Hawk WB 387 27
518 Orangethorpe & Orangethorpe Park EB 564 26
519 Ball & Allec EB 67 25
519 City Hall SB N/A 2014 25
519 La Palma & Paradise WB 399 25
522 Ball & East EB 69 24
522 La Palma & Lakeview EB 360 24
522 Magnolia & Woodland NB 527 24
522 Orangethorpe & Miller EB 569 24
522 Tustin & Jefferson NB 688 24
527 Orangethorpe & Del Cerro EB 572 22
528 Tustin & Enterprise SB 691 21
529 Ball & Allec WB 80 20
529 Ball & Phoenix Club EB 5113 20
529 La Palma & Richfield EB 358 20
532 Orangethorpe & Thames WB 589 18
533 Ball & Westvale WB 104 15
534 La Palma & Kellogg EB 362 14
535 Magnolia & Greenleaf NB 525 13
535 Orangethorpe & Chapman EB 570 13
537 Social Services Orange WB N/A 4019 10
538 Miller & Ent 1371 Datatech NB 546 9
538 Orangethorpe & Glenview WB 586 9
540 Magnolia & Madison NB 523 8
540 Orangethorpe & Concerto WB 583 8
540 Orangethorpe & Willow Woods EB 578 8
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 2 – State of the System Report
Appendix D
Rank
Bus Stop
Stops denoted by * are located outside Anaheim city
limits
Direction
ATN
Stop
ID
OCTA
Stop
ID
Total Monthly
Boardings
540 State College & Gene Autry NB 644 8
544 La Palma & Brasher EB 363 7
544 Orangethorpe & Boisseranc WB 5121 7
546 Kraemer & Miraloma SB 316 6
546 La Palma & Fee Ana EB 359 6
546 La Palma & Van Buren EB 357 6
549 Orangethorpe & Traub EB 571 5
550 La Palma & Hawk EB 356 4
550 Tustin & Miraloma NB 689 4
552 Miller & Ent 1371 Datatech SB 549 3
553 Ball & Sherman EB 70 2
553 Via Burton & Daly EB 8202 2
555 Miller & Orangethorpe SB 7894 1
555 Orangethorpe & Concerto EB 577 1
555 Orangethorpe & Cymbal EB 5119 1
555 Orangethorpe & Imperial WB 580 1
559 Miraloma & Grove EB 7904 -
559 Miraloma & Miller EB 8277 -
559 Orangethorpe & Boisseranc EB 5118 -
559 Orangethorpe & Glenview EB 574 -
559 Vermont & Melrose N/A 5011 -

ANALYSIS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS
B

CITY OF ANAHEIM TRANSIT MASTER PLAN
105
Prepared For Prepared By
City of Anaheim
200 S. Anaheim Blvd.

Anaheim, CA 92805
CR Associates
800 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 620
Los Angeles, CA 90017

ANAHEIM TRANSIT

MASTER PLAN UPDATE
DECEMBER 2025
FINAL
Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints
& Initial Recommendations Report
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report Page i
Table of Contents
Glossary ................................................................................................................................................ 0

1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1

2.0 Community Characteristics ........................................................................................................... 2 Population .................................................................................................................................................. 2 Demographic and Socioeconomic Characteristics .................................................................................. 4 Equity Areas .............................................................................................................................................10 Employment .............................................................................................................................................11

2.4.1 Employment by Sector..................................................................................................................13

2.4.2 Sub-$40,000 a Year Employment.................................................................................................. 2 Land Uses and Key Activity Centers ......................................................................................................... 3

3.0 Transit Propensity and Land Use Analysis .................................................................................... 5 Transit Propensity ...................................................................................................................................... 5 Transit Supportive Densities ..................................................................................................................... 8 OCTA Service............................................................................................................................................10

3.3.1 Span of Service .............................................................................................................................10

3.3.2 Frequency ......................................................................................................................................11

3.3.3 Variability in Route Run Times .....................................................................................................13

3.3.4 Intersection Improvements to Improve Speed and Reliability ...................................................13

3.3.5 High Ridership and Low Service Frequency ................................................................................17 Bus Stop Analysis.....................................................................................................................................19

3.4.1 Bus Stop Analysis Methodology ...................................................................................................19

3.4.2 Bus Stop Analysis Findings...........................................................................................................20

3.4.3 Bus Stop Recommendations........................................................................................................22 Emerging Transit Options ........................................................................................................................23

3.5.1 Mobility as a Service .....................................................................................................................23

3.5.2 Microtransit ...................................................................................................................................24 Emerging Transit Technology ..................................................................................................................25

3.6.1 Smart Fare Technology .................................................................................................................25

3.6.2 Transit Apps and Rider Tools........................................................................................................26

4.0 Opportunities for Improving Transit in Anaheim ........................................................................ 27

5.0 Project Goals, Recommendations, and Evaluation Results ....................................................... 31 Project Goals ............................................................................................................................................31 Evaluation Criteria ...................................................................................................................................33 Potential Recommendations...................................................................................................................36 Recommendations Evaluation................................................................................................................40 Transit Network Framework ....................................................................................................................40 Appendix A - Potential Intersection Improvements Additional Information ......................................... 43 Appendix B - Bus Stop Analysis Detailed Methodology and Raw Scoring ........................................... 47 Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report Page ii
List of Figures
Figure 2.1 - Population Density, 2022........................................................................................................3 Figure 2.2 - Population Density, 2045........................................................................................................3 Figure 2.3 - Population Change, 2022-2045.............................................................................................4 Figure 2.4 - Older Adult Population.............................................................................................................5 Figure 2.5 - Disabled Population.................................................................................................................6 Figure 2.6 - Low-Income Households .........................................................................................................6 Figure 2.7 - Vehicle Access per Adult .........................................................................................................7 Figure 2.8 - Renter Households ..................................................................................................................8 Figure 2.9 - Rent Burdened Households ....................................................................................................8 Figure 2.10 - Limited English Proficiency Population ................................................................................9 Figure 2.11 - CalEnviroScreen 4.0........................................................................................................... 10 Figure 2.12 - Bus Shelters in Disadvantaged Communities, 2025....................................................... 11 Figure 2.13 - Employment Density, 2021 ............................................................................................... 12 Figure 2.14 - Employment Density, 2045 ............................................................................................... 13 Figure 2.15 - Employment Change, 2021-2045..................................................................................... 13 Figure 2.16 - Existing Employment by Sector.............................................................................................0 Figure 2.17 - Food and Accommodation Employment ..............................................................................0 Figure 2.18 - Retail and Service Employment............................................................................................1 Figure 2.19 - Sub $40,000 a Year Employment........................................................................................2 Figure 2.20 - Existing Land Uses.................................................................................................................3 Figure 2.21 - Major Destinations ................................................................................................................4 Figure 3.1 - Transit Propensity ....................................................................................................................6 Figure 3.2 - Ridership vs. Transit Propensity..............................................................................................7 Figure 3.3 - Low Ridership and High Transit Propensity Areas .................................................................7 Figure 3.4 - Transit Supportive Population and Employment Densities...................................................8 Figure 3.5 - Transit Supportive Densities in Anaheim, 2022....................................................................9 Figure 3.6 - OCTA Weekday Span of Service, Fall 2024......................................................................... 10 Figure 3.7 - OCTA Service Frequency by Stop during Midday, 2024..................................................... 11 Figure 3.8 - OCTA Service Frequency by Stop during PM Peak Hour, 2024 ......................................... 12 Figure 3.9 - OCTA Route Variability, 2024............................................................................................... 13 Figure 3.10 - OCTA Ridership vs Transit Supply during Midday............................................................. 17 Figure 3.11 - OCTA Ridership vs Transit Supply during PM Peak Hour................................................. 18 Figure 3.12 - Bus Stop Analysis Results and Transit Need.................................................................... 20 Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report Page iii
List of Tables
Table 2.1 - Estimated and Forecasted Population ....................................................................................2 Table 2.2 - Estimated and Forecasted Employment............................................................................... 11 Table 3.1 - Description of Intersection Treatment Metric Ratings......................................................... 15 Table 3.2 - Intersection Treatment Ratings............................................................................................. 16 Table 3.3 - Bus Stop Analysis Summary Scores ..................................................................................... 21 Table 3.4 - Smart Fare Technology .......................................................................................................... 25 Table 3.5 - Typical Features Included in Transit Apps............................................................................ 26 Table 5.1 - Evaluation Criteria with Scoring Thresholds......................................................................... 33 Table 5.2 - Priority Project Evaluation...................................................................................................... 42 Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report Glossary
ACS American Community Survey
ADA Americans With Disabilities Act
ADAS Advanced Driver Assistance
Systems
ANNA Advancing Neighborhood
Networks for All
API Application Programming
Interface
ART Anaheim Regional Transportation
ARTIC Anaheim Regional Transportation
Intermodal Center
ASaaS Autonomous Shuttle-as-a-Service
ASC Adaptive Signal Control
ATAM Anaheim Traffic Analysis Model
ATN Anaheim Transportation Network
AVL Automatic Vehicle Location
BRT Bus Rapid Transit
Cal-ITP California Integrated Travel
Project
CPTED Crime Prevention Through
Environmental Design
EVE Everyone Ventures Everywhere
FHWA Federal Highway Administration
FRAN Free Rides Around The
Neighborhood
FTA Federal Transit Administration
GPS Global Positioning System
GTFS General Transit Feed Specification
HUD Department of Housing and Urban
Development
LA Metro Los Angeles County Metropolitan
Transportation Authority
LEHD Longitudinal Employer-Household
Dynamics
LEP Limited English Proficiency
MaaS Mobility as a Service
NACTO National Association of City
Transportation Officials
NFC Near Field Communication
OCTA Orange County Transportation
Authority
RTA Riverside Transit Agency
SCAG Southern California Association of
Governments
STAR Strategic Transit Automation
Research Plan
TAP Transit Access Pass
TCRP Transit Cooperative Research
Program
TMP Transit Master Plan
TSP Transit Signal Priority
VMT Vehicle Miles Traveled

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report

1.0 Introduction
This report, prepared as part of the Anaheim Transit Master Plan (ATMP), evaluates transit demand, identifies gaps and constraints in the existing system, and develops preliminary recommendations to improve transit service, access, and performance across the city. The analysis draws on demographic and socioeconomic data, land use and employment patterns, existing ridership trends, and areas with high transit propensity. It also includes a high-level service-review of Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) and Anaheim Transportation Network (ATN) operations. Service levels, amenities, and accessibility was evaluated at bus stops in high-propensity, low-ridership areas, which was used to guide stop-level recommendations.

The analysis identified areas in Anaheim with potential to generate more transit usage based on population, employment and land use characteristics and identified deficiencies around the city which may limit transit usage.

Initial recommendations include physical improvements, service adjustments, and policy strategies to improve mobility, increase ridership, and support Anaheim’s transit riders. In addition to fixed-route transit improvement options, the report also considers the suitability of alternative strategies such as microtransit and Mobility as a Service (MaaS), and technologies which improve the ease of fare payment and trip planning. These recommendations will be refined through stakeholder engagement and technical review in subsequent phases of the project.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report

2.0 Community Characteristics
This chapter examines population and employment data for Anaheim, land use conditions, and major destinations, to highlight areas and corridors that support transit. One of the key evaluation measures of an area’s potential to generate transit ridership is transit propensity, further described in Chapter

3. Population
This section provides an overview of existing and projected population growth. Table 2.1 summarizes Anaheim’s population in 2016 (baseline) and the forecasted population in 2045 from the Anaheim Traffic Analysis Model (ATAM). Using ATAM with baseline population data beginning in 2016, it is projected that Anaheim’s population will grow by about 85,000 between 2016 and 2045, a 25% increase.

Table 2.1 - Estimated and Forecasted Population
Baseline ATAM
Population (2016)
Adjusted
Population
Estimate (2022)1
Forecasted ATAM
Population (2045)
Percentage
Increase from
Baseline
City of Anaheim 345,999 346,333 431,340 25%
Source: ATAM Model
Figures 2.1 through 2.3 show population density by census block group for baseline and forecasted years, and the percentage change between the two periods. This context supports future planning efforts by identifying where growth in transit demand is most likely to occur.

Figure 2.1 presents population density by census block group in Anaheim using 2022 American Community Survey (5-year estimate) data to reflect current population density within Anaheim and align with the 2022 demographic and socioeconomic data used in section 2.2 figures. Higher-density areas appear predominantly in central Anaheim along major corridors, reflecting established residential neighborhoods and mixed-use districts.

This baseline view illustrates the existing distribution of residents across the city and serves as a reference point for evaluating where current concentrations of population may support transit and active transportation.
1 2022 population in the ATAM model was estimated by calculating the percent difference in population between US Census American Community Survey (ACS) years 2016 and 2022 and multiplying it by the 2016 ATAM population.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report

Figure 2.1 - Population Density, 2022
Source: 2022 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimate
Figure 2.2 displays projected population density by Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) for the year 2045 using the ATAM model. The map shows where higher or lower concentrations of residents are expected based on available population forecasts. As shown, densities increase throughout West and Central Anaheim, especially in Downtown and the Platinum Triangle.

Figure 2.2 - Population Density, 2045
Source: ATAM Model
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report

Figure 2.3 shows the areas of Anaheim where population density is expected to increase over the next 20 years by comparing 2022 estimated ATAM population numbers to the projected population growth from the ATAM Model. The Platinum Triangle is projected to experience the highest increase in population density, indicating a potential opportunity to improve transit service in that area.

Figure 2.3 - Population Change, 2022-2045
Source: ATAM Model, 2022 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimate Demographic and Socioeconomic Characteristics
Providing good transit access and mobility should be an objective for demographic groups who contend with constraints which limit their mobility. Socioeconomic characteristics, such as older adults, people with disabilities, low-income households, household vehicle access, housing tenure and burden (renter status), and limited English proficiency were examined citywide to determine where there are high concentrations of mobility limiting constraints.

Older Adults
Having access to transit provides a potential mobility option for older adults (people ages 65 and older) for whom some, due to aging, lose their ability to drive. There are several transit options for older adults within Anaheim. ATN operates a service called Senior Wheels, for adults aged 60 and older for Anaheim residents which can be used for trips within 10-miles of their residence and for trips to medical appointments and select shopping and recreational destinations either in Anaheim or neighboring cities. OCTA operates OC ACCESS, a paratransit service required as part of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). OC ACCESS provides curb-to-curb service within 0.75-miles of OCTA fixed routes to qualified individuals whose physical or cognitive limitations prevent them from using fixedroute service. Passengers share the vehicle with other passengers. ATN’s Senior Wheels provides a similar service, covering all of Anaheim with eligibility being less restrictive than the OC ACCESS service.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report

As shown in Figure 2.4, there are higher densities of older adults west of Harbor Boulevard, which are served well by OCTA. Anaheim Hills, which also has older adult populations, lacks OCTA route coverage and is beyond the coverage area for OC ACCESS.

Figure 2.4 - Older Adult Population
Source: 2022 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimate

People with Disabilities
Some disabilities prevent people from being able to operate a vehicle, and as such, they may need to rely on transit and paratransit services to meet their transportation needs.

As shown in Figure 2.5, disabled populations are most concentrated in Downtown and West Anaheim, well within the grid of OCTA’s bus network. West Anaheim is also well within the OC ACCESS service area.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report

Figure 2.5 - Disabled Population
Source: 2022 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimate

Low-Income Households
Low-income households, defined in Figure 2.6, as households making $40,000 a year or less, are more concentrated in West Anaheim, where OCTA bus service has stronger coverage and frequency.

Figure 2.6 - Low-Income Households
Source: 2022 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimate
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report

Vehicle Access per Adult
Figure 2.7 displays the ratio of average vehicles per household to average number of adults per household by census block group. A ratio under 1 indicates a higher likelihood of non-vehicle owning adults and/or households who share vehicles. Lower vehicle ownership per capita signifies trips are being made with other transportation modes, likely including transit. Households with fewer vehicles per adult are primarily in Downtown, West Anaheim, and the Resort Area.

Figure 2.7 - Vehicle Access per Adult
Source: 2022 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimate

Renters and Rent-Burdened Households
Figure 2.8 shows the density of renter households in Anaheim. Renters are concentrated west of the Santa Ana River, with most living in West Anaheim, Northwest Anaheim, Downtown, and the Platinum Triangle. These areas are with most proximity to OCTA bus service. Anaheim has an average of 1.74 rental households per acre, while the densest part of the city averages 2.84 households per acre.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report

Figure 2.8 - Renter Households
Source: 2022 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimate

Renters who spend over 50% of household income on shelter are considered rent-burdened, according to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). As shown in Figure 2.9, rent burdened households are most concentrated in West Anaheim and Northwest Anaheim.

Figure 2.9 - Rent Burdened Households
Source: 2022 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimate
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report

Limited English Proficiency
Limited English Proficiency is often an indicator of immigrant communities, who are more likely to take transit, as cited in a white paper by the Migration Policy Institute2.

As shown in Figure 2.10, Northwest Anaheim and Downtown have the highest density of individuals with limited English proficiency.

Figure 2.10 - Limited English Proficiency Population
Source: 2022 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimate
2 Article: Movement after Migration: Immigrants’ D.. | migrationpolicy.org Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report

Equity Areas
Transportation equity seeks to prioritize resources for those who need them most. The City’s Environmental Justice (EJ) Element uses the California Communities Environmental Health Screening Tool (CalEnviroScreen 4.0), to identify EJ communities. The measure identifies where people are most burdened by pollution and its cumulative effects. Figure 2.11 shows CalEnviroScreen 4.0 statewide percentile rankings and disadvantaged communities. According to this measure, most of Anaheim west of the Santa Ana River is categorized as a disadvantaged community. This designation encompasses Northwest Anaheim and Downtown (where statewide percentiles are highest), Anaheim Canyon, and sections of West Anaheim.

Figure 2.11 - CalEnviroScreen 4.0
Source: State of California OEHHA, 2023
Bus stops with and without shelters were overlaid with disadvantaged communities to determine the extent to which these amenities provide benefit to those areas. Bus shelters provide some protection from environmental elements, such as heat exposure, and can make taking transit a less hostile experience. Figure 2.12 shows that bus shelters are slightly less common in disadvantaged areas. Out of the 300 stops in disadvantaged areas, 71 have a shelter (nearly a quarter). Shelters are slightly more common in non-disadvantaged areas (nearly 30%). Disadvantaged communities have a greater need for transit shelters and are slightly underserved compared to non-disadvantaged areas.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report

Figure 2.12 - Bus Shelters in Disadvantaged Communities, 2025 Source: State of California OEHHA, ATN, OCTA
Employment
Employment density is a good indicator of how much demand there is for transit service. According to the Public Policy Institute of California, employment density is more strongly associated with transit use than residential density. Areas with higher employment density are more likely to have productive transit service than areas with lower employment density.

Table 2.2 summarizes Anaheim’s employment in 2016 (baseline) and the forecasted employment in 2045 from ATAM. It is projected the number of jobs in Anaheim will grow by about 60,000, between 2016 and 2045 (or about 29%).

Table 2.2 - Estimated and Forecasted Employment

Baseline ATAM
Employment (2016)
Adjusted
Employment
Estimate (2021)3
Forecasted ATAM
Employment
(2045)
Percentage
Increase from
Baseline
City of Anaheim 213,193 179,602 274,213 29%
Source: ATAM Model

3 2021 employment in the ATAM model was estimated by calculating the percent difference in employment between US Census American Community Survey (ACS) years 2016 and 2021 and multiplying by 2016 ATAM employment.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report

Figure 2.13 shows that the largest centers of employment in Anaheim are the Anaheim Canyon, Platinum Triangle, and Resort. Parts of Downtown also have high employment density.

Figure 2.13 - Employment Density, 2021
Source: US Census LEHD
Figure 2.14 shows forecasted employment density in 2045. Figure 2.15 shows percent change in employment from 2016 to 2045. While growth is projected throughout Anaheim, growth is most pronounced in the Anaheim Canyon, Platinum Triangle, and Resort Area.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report

Figure 2.14 - Employment Density, 2045
Source: ATAM Model
Figure 2.15 - Employment Change, 2021-2045
Source: ATAM Model

2.4.1 Employment by Sector
Figure 2.16 shows the employment concentrations by commercial, educational, health, and industrial sectors. Each sector has different travel characteristics that must be considered when designing transit service. For instance, the industrial (manufacturing) and healthcare sectors include many jobs which are on shift schedules that do not align with typical peak commute periods.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report

Figure 2.16 - Existing Employment by Sector
Source: US Census LEHD
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report

The major anchors for jobs in Anaheim are Disneyland and the Anaheim Convention Center.

Surrounding these attractions are also numerous hotels and restaurants. To a lesser extent Angel Stadium, Honda Center, and surrounding development, also contribute to the concentration of these sectors of employment in the Platinum Triangle. Anaheim’s other major employment area, Anaheim Canyon, includes a mix of industrial and healthcare jobs.

Figures 2.17 and 2.18 show the local densities of food and accommodation (hospitality) jobs, and retail and service jobs, respectively. These sectors employ many transit users and attract a significant number of visitor trips compared to other industries. In Anaheim, most of these jobs are within the Resort Area.

Figure 2.17 - Food and Accommodation Employment
Source: US Census LEHD
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report

Figure 2.18 - Retail and Service Employment

Source: US Census LEHD
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report

2.4.2 Sub-$40,000 a Year Employment
Figure 2.19 shows the density of sub-$40,000 per year jobs in Anaheim. As shown, they are concentrated in each of Anaheim’s three major employment areas: the Resort, the Platinum Triangle, and Anaheim Canyon. These findings are generally consistent with the overall employment density, as depicted in Figure 2.13.

Figure 2.19 - Sub $40,000 a Year Employment
Source: US Census LEHD
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report

Land Uses and Key Activity Centers
Figure 2.20 shows existing land use in Anaheim. Residential land use covers most of the city. Industrial land uses generally adhere to rail corridors and Interstate 5. Both the Platinum Triangle and Anaheim Canyon are heavily industrial and commercial. The Resort is primarily leisure-oriented land uses and commercial. Northwest and West Anaheim are mostly residential with commercial along major arterials (Northwest Anaheim also contains some industrial land uses along the Interstate 5 corridor.

Anaheim Hills primarily consists of residential and open space.

Figure 2.20 - Existing Land Uses
Source: City of Anaheim
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report As shown in Figure 2.21, most major destinations in Anaheim are located along or near existing transit routes (though the Anaheim Hills Festival shopping center is without bus service after discontinuation of Route 38 service to this location).

Figure 2.21 - Major Destinations
Source: City of Anaheim
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report

3.0 Transit Propensity and Land Use Analysis
Understanding a community’s transit needs is important for delivering equitable and efficient transit service, that is responsive to current and future mobility patterns and needs. This section examines socioeconomic characteristics which correlate to transit usage (i.e. transit propensity). It also evaluates transit service conditions including ridership, density, performance, and stop amenities.

By analyzing where transit-dependent populations live, how service aligns with ridership, and what types of service are most appropriate for different areas, the City and its partners can better tailor service improvement recommendations and priorities as well as investment strategies to meet realworld travel needs.

Transit propensity considers where transit trips originate, in other words, the characteristics of where likely transit using demographics live and are anticipated to begin transit trips. Transit supporting densities also identify where trips end thereby, capturing both where people who are likely to use transit live and work.

Transit Propensity
Using select demographic, socioeconomic, and employment data can help determine overall transit propensity for a given area. Areas of higher propensity are more likely to generate ridership and support transit service. The following demographic and socio-economic characteristics were overlaid to form a transit propensity composite for Anaheim. These characteristics are identified as being more likely to support transit usage:
 Higher percentage of persons of color
 Lower rates of vehicle ownership per household
 Lower rates of US-citizenship
 Lower median household income
Anaheim’s transit propensity is displayed in Figure 3.1. As shown, transit propensity is highest in parts of West Anaheim, the Resort Area, the Platinum Triangle, and Downtown. These areas already have fixed-route services; however, improving transit service to these areas (for example, by providing greater frequency, longer spans of service, improving reliability, and providing more amenities at stops) can improve mobility and service quality above what is provided currently.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report Figure 3.1 - Transit Propensity
Source: Nelson\Nygaard
Figure 3.2 overlays census block groups with high bus ridership with transit propensity. Blue areas in the map (most evident in the Resort and parts of Northwest Anaheim) have high ridership despite having a lower concentration of people identified as being more likely to take transit. This indicates that service is good in these areas and therefore transit is capturing a large number of trips, likely from riders who choose to use transit rather than other transportation modes.

Areas in brown represent both higher transit propensity and higher ridership; both transit user demographics and transit usage are high (in Downtown and sections of Northwest Anaheim). The areas in orange are those with high transit propensity (transit user characteristics) but have low ridership, indicating areas where transit service is potentially underperforming in places with good ridership potential.

The overlay shows that these conditions are most prevalent in Anaheim Canyon and West Anaheim.

Figure 3.3 isolates the highest propensity and lowest ridership geographies to more clearly illustrate where transit service could improve to capture more riders.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report Figure 3.2 - Ridership vs. Transit Propensity
Source: Nelson\Nygaard, OCTA
Figure 3.3 - Low Ridership and High Transit Propensity Areas Source: Nelson\Nygaard, OCTA
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report Transit Supportive Densities
The type and amount of transit service an area can support is largely determined by population and employment densities in an area. Figure 3.4 shows approximate population and employment densities, along with the typical built environments for these densities, based on transit planning best practices and market research. The figure also indicates appropriate types of transit and frequency (if applicable).

Figure 3.4 - Transit Supportive Population and Employment Densities Source: CR Associates, Nelson\Nygaard
Based on this guidance, Anaheim’s population density, employment density, and transit propensity were overlaid to identify ideal levels of transit frequency by areas in the city. The results, shown in Figure 3.5, indicate that most of Anaheim, except Anaheim Hills, have densities that support some level of fixed-route service. While this analysis is not prescriptive, especially due to the variations in supportive densities along a given street/corridor, it does indicate what level of service could be warranted for key destinations.

For example, the Anaheim Hills Festival shopping center (which recently had fixed-route service discontinued) is an anchor destination and therefore warrants frequent transit service. However, the

3.5-mile corridor along Imperial Highway used to reach The Festival shopping center is shown as warranting less frequent transit service. This highlights a tradeoff between providing frequent service through areas with limited demand and ensuring that riders can still reach key destinations.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report Figure 3.5 - Transit Supportive Densities in Anaheim, 2022 Source: CR Associates, Nelson\Nygaard, ACS, LEHD
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report OCTA Service
OCTA is a major transit provider in Anaheim, moving people both within Anaheim and between Anaheim and neighboring cities. This section analyzes OCTA’s service in greater detail as potential modifications to OCTA’s bus service could have an outsized impact on improving transit overall in Anaheim. This section presents the results of several potential indicators of service quality.

3.3.1 Span of Service
Figure 3.6 maps the Spring 2024 weekday span (hours per day a route operates) of service for OCTA routes traversing Anaheim. As shown, Beach Boulevard, Harbor Boulevard, and State College Boulevard have the longest spans of service. These routes run almost continuously, providing users with deep late and early morning service which better accommodates employment with shifts occurring outside of typical/peak times. OCTA service east of Imperial Highway has recently been reduced, and there is no current fixed-route service to Anaheim Hills.

Figure 3.6 - OCTA Weekday Span of Service, Fall 2024
Source: OCTA
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report

3.3.2 Frequency
Figure 3.7 shows the weekday frequency of OCTA bus service by stop between 10:00am and 3:00pm (midday, or outside of commute peak periods). This includes stop locations where multiple routes overlap (e.g., Routes 43 and 543 operating on Harbor Boulevard). Anaheim Boulevard and State College Boulevard are the corridors with the highest midday frequencies. Sections of Beach Boulevard, Harbor Boulevard, Katella Avenue, Ball Road, and La Palma Avenue have higher frequencies where bus routes converge along those corridors.

Figure 3.7 - OCTA Service Frequency by Stop during Midday, 2024 Source: OCTA
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report Figure 3.8 shows weekday PM peak period frequency of OCTA bus service by stop. Frequencies on many corridors are higher during the PM peak period than during midday, with La Palma Avenue, Lincoln Avenue, Harbor Boulevard, and Katella Avenue having higher frequencies in at least one direction of travel during the PM Peak hours.

Figure 3.8 - OCTA Service Frequency by Stop during PM Peak Hour, 2024 Source: OCTA
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report

3.3.3 Variability in Route Run Times
Traffic congestion can reduce the reliability of travel times on transit and impact on-time performance.

Run times (the scheduled time it takes for a bus to complete an end-to-end circuit) of a given route was examined. Large variability in the schedule can be an indicator of the need for speed/reliability improvements. Shortest scheduled run times are typically in the late evening hours when traffic is lightest and less passengers are boarding and alighting. The shortest scheduled run times represent the potential of routes if they operate smoothly in traffic and in the boarding/alighting process.

Speed and reliability improvements could include transit signal priority, queue jumps, or bus-only lanes. Based on a review of published schedules, the following routes and directions were identified as having a variability of four or more minutes in running time between midday and PM peak hours (PM peak hours have more traffic than AM). The routes and directions with the highest run time variability are shown in Figure 3.9.

Figure 3.9 - OCTA Route Variability, 2024
Source: OCTA

3.3.4 Intersection Improvements to Improve Speed and Reliability As noted in Section 3.3.3 and in Figure 3.9, the following roadways within Anaheim have transit service with higher variability in running time:
• La Palma Avenue (OCTA 38 Westbound)
• Lincoln Avenue (OCTA 42/A Eastbound)
• Ball Road (OCTA 48 Westbound)
• Harbor Boulevard (OCTA 47 Southbound)
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report Below are potential treatments that can be applied at specific intersections or systemwide to enhance transit speed and reliability:

1. Transit Signal Priority (TSP)
• TSP modifies signal timing to reduce delays for transit vehicles by extending green lights or shortening red phases when a bus approaches.

2. Queue Jump Lanes
• Queue jump lanes are short, dedicated lanes, typically located in the rightmost travel lane at intersections, that allow buses to bypass queued traffic and proceed through the intersection ahead of general vehicles.

3. Transit-focused Signal Coordination
• Transit-focused signal coordination aligns green lights along a corridor as buses approach to support continuous bus movement.

4. Far-Side Bus Stops
• Far-side stops are placed after intersections, allowing buses to clear signals before picking up or dropping off passengers.

5. Peak-Hour Bus-Only Lanes
• These lanes operate exclusively for transit vehicles during peak travel times, often repurposing curbs or parking lanes.

6. Full-Time Dedicated Bus Lanes
• Dedicated bus lanes are reserved 24/7 for transit vehicles.

7. Adaptive Signal Control (ASC) for Transit
• ASC uses real-time data to adjust signal timing based on current traffic conditions and vehicle presence, including transit vehicles.

8. Signal Retiming and Corridor Optimization
• Signal retiming for transit involves updating cycle lengths, offsets, and green splits to align with bus operations, stop locations, and speeds.

The performance improvements listed above are based on published case studies, pilot programs, and global best practices. Additional information regarding these improvements is provided in Appendix A of this report. It should be noted that these improvements are not additive, meaning that a combination of these improvements at one intersection or corridor does not guarantee cumulative gains due to operational constraints, overlapping benefits, or diminishing returns. Actual results will vary based on corridor geometry, transit frequency, traffic volumes, signal spacing, local policies, and rider demand.

Each intersection speed and reliability improvement was analyzed by three metrics:
• Increasing (non-transit) roadway vehicular capacity
• Increasing bus movement/transit throughput
• Cost effectiveness
The improvements received a rating for each metric on a scale from 3 to -3, with 3 points awarded for if the treatment was most effective toward accomplishing the metric and -3 being least effective. The conditions corresponding for each possible metric rating are presented in Table 3.1 Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report Table 3.1 - Description of Intersection Treatment Metric Ratings Rating
Description of Metric by Rating
Increased Roadway Vehicular Capacity
(non-transit)
Increased Bus Movement/Transit
Throughput Cost Effectiveness
3 Significant increase in general traffic
flow and reduced congestion for nontransit vehicles.

Major improvement in bus speed,
reliability, or priority (e.g., dedicated
lanes or signal priority).

Very low-cost improvement with
minimal implementation effort (e.g.,
signal retiming, striping).
2 Moderate improvement in vehicle
throughput or delay reduction.

Moderate enhancement to bus flow or
delay reduction (e.g., queue jumps,
improved spacing).

Low-cost intervention requiring
moderate effort or materials.
1 Slight positive effect on non-transit
vehicle operations.

Minor benefit to bus movement, such
as improved stop placement.

Moderate cost improvement with
manageable implementation needs.
0 Neutral; no noticeable change in
capacity. No effect on bus movement. Neutral cost level (baseline or standard investment). -1 Minor reduction in general vehicle
capacity or increased delay.

Slight negative impact to bus routes or
delay.

Somewhat expensive improvement
requiring additional resources or
coordination.
-2
Moderate reduction in vehicle
throughput; may lead to localized
congestion.

Noticeable degradation to bus travel
time or reliability.

High-cost solution involving significant
infrastructure or construction.
-3 Severe degradation of vehicle capacity
or significant increase in delays.

Severe adverse effect on bus
operations or rerouting required.

Very high-cost or capital-intensive
project with complex implementation.

Source: CR Associates, Nelson\Nygaard

Ratings were assigned to each treatment based on their impact to traffic operations, improvement of transit throughput, and each treatment’s cost effectiveness. The combined metric ratings for each treatment are shown in Table 3.2.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report Table 3.2 - Intersection Treatment Ratings
#
Intersection Speed
and Reliability
Treatment
Increases
Road
Capacity
Increases
Bus
Throughput
Cost
Effectiveness
Total
Rating Summary
1 Transit Signal
Priority (TSP) 1 3 2 6
Low disruption, high transit
benefit, relatively low
implementation cost.
2 Queue Jump Lanes 0 2 2 4
Supports buses with minimal auto
impact, moderate cost due to lane
striping or signal adjustments.
3 Transit-focused
Signal Coordination 1 2 2 5
Enables continuous flow along a
corridor with successive green
lights (“Green Waves”) for bus
transit and other traffic traveling at
typical bus transit speeds;
moderate cost due to signal
programming.
4 Far-Side Bus Stops 0 2 1 3
Improves bus efficiency; minimal
impact on traffic flow and low
relocation costs.
5 Peak-Hour BusOnly Lanes -1 2 1 2
May reduce general vehicle
capacity during peak hours; low
cost of signage/striping.
6 Full-Time
Dedicated Bus
Lanes
-2 3 -2 -1
Major benefit to transit, but costly
and significantly reduces vehicle
capacity if it replaces an existing
vehicle lane.
7 Adaptive Signal
Control (ASC) for
Transit
0 2 -1 1
High tech upgrade: benefits buses
in dynamic conditions, but requires
investment.
8 Signal Retiming
and Corridor
Optimization
1 1 2 4
Improves flow for all; relatively lowcost update to existing infrastructure.

Source: CR Associates
The treatments were classified into most, moderately, and least feasible, as follows:

• Most feasible (5 to 6 points): Improvements like TSP and transit-focused signal coordination offer strong bus mobility gains at relatively low cost with minimal negative impacts on general traffic.
• Moderately feasible (3 to 4 points): Queue jumps, peak-hour lanes, and signal retiming show good cost-effectiveness and moderate benefits.
• Least feasible (≤1 point): Improvements such as full-time dedicated bus lanes have high cost and high impacts to other traffic operations.

A corridor or route-specific analysis is strongly recommended before implementation of any strategy to determine cost-effectiveness, achievable performance improvements, and operational trade-offs.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report

3.3.5 High Ridership and Low Service Frequency
Figures 3.10 and 3.11 show bus stops with high weekday OCTA ridership (50 or more boardings per stop) and low service frequency (30 minutes or more between bus arrivals) during the midday and PM peak period, respectively. This illustrates where there is high transit usage despite longer waiting times for buses, which indicates the importance of connectivity along the highlighted corridors.

The following streets had numerous high ridership stops with lower bus service frequencies:
 La Palma Avenue (12 stops)
 Euclid Street (9 stops)
 Lincoln Avenue (7 stops)
 Katella Avenue (6 stops)
 Ball Road (5 stops)
Figure 3.10 - OCTA Ridership vs Transit Supply during Midday Source: OCTA
During the PM peak period, Euclid Street (9 stops) and Ball Road (5 stops) had the most numerous high ridership stops with lower bus service frequencies. This indicates that riders along these corridors will use transit despite long wait times for buses due to important connections the routes provide or because of limited transit options along the corridors.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report Figure 3.11 - OCTA Ridership vs Transit Supply during PM Peak Hour Source: OCTA
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report Bus Stop Analysis
Bus stops in the City of Anaheim vary widely in ridership, from some of the region’s most heavily used transit nodes to others that serve fewer than 20 riders per day. The bus stop analysis presented in this section examined 64 low-use stops (where monthly ridership was below 500 boardings) located in high transit propensity areas (where demographic and land use patterns would suggest strong demand). Three key dimensions were evaluated: service, access, and amenities, to determine if physical, operational, and/or contextual deficiencies may have contributed to this mismatch. National and regional research provided recommendations for improvements that could increase ridership.

3.4.1 Bus Stop Analysis Methodology
Sixty-four (64) low ridership bus stops located in high transit propensity areas were examined on the basis of two criteria:
• Low Ridership: Fewer than 500 boardings per month across OCTA and ATN services • High Transit Propensity: High Transit Propensity score (presented in Section 3.0) Stops were evaluated using numerical metrics under the three main categories: service, access, and amenities. Each metric was
scored from 0 to 4, and scores
were averaged within
categories and totaled to
generate a composite score
(maximum of 12). Two control
stops with high ridership (one
in a low propensity area and
one in a high propensity area)
were also analyzed for
comparison (Anaheim
Boulevard/Lincoln Avenue and
Harbor Boulevard/Katella
Avenue). High Ridership and High Propensity stop Anaheim Boulevard and Lincoln Avenue (Source: Google Streetview)
High Ridership and Low Propensity stop at Harbor Boulevard and Katella Avenue (Source: Google Streetview)
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report Research used to develop the metrics included:
• OCTA’s Transit-Supportive Design Guidelines (2023)
[https://www.octa.net/pdf/OCTATransit-SupportiveDesignGuidelines.pdf] • NACTO Transit Street Design Guide
https://nacto.org/publication/transit-street-design-guide/ • Academic research documenting the relationship between stop-level conditions and ridership, including:
o Kim et al. (2020): “The Connections Between Bus Stop Amenities, Bus Ridership, and ADA Paratransit Demand”
[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.03.019]
o Ray et al. (2006): “How the Built Environment Affects Ridership” [https://www.pedbikeinfo.org/cms/downloads/TTA 20Final 20Report.pdf] o Shi et al. (2021): “Does Improving Stop Amenities Help Increase BRT Ridership?” [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.11.010]
More detailed information on the Bus Stop Analysis methodology is provided in Appendix B.

3.4.2 Bus Stop Analysis Findings
Figure 3.12 maps the results of the bus stop analysis overlaid on transit propensity. Low-scoring stops are clustered along Ball Road, Euclid Street, Knott Avenue, and Brookhurst Street. Many stops near parks, schools, or commercial centers had high transit potential but lacked necessary amenities Figure 3.12 - Bus Stop Analysis Results and Transit Need Source: ACS, ATN, OCTA
Table 3.3 ranks the overall composite score for each low ridership / high propensity stop from lowest to highest, with their respective subcategory scores for service, access, and amenities. Total scores are out of 12 points and are comprised of scores of up to 4 points for each subcategory. Results are Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report color coded with a green-orange-red color ramp, with higher scores (for composite and each subcategory) corresponding to shades of green, and lower scores correspond to shades of red.

Table 3.3 - Bus Stop Analysis Summary Scores
Stop ID Stop Name Dir.

Monthly
Ridership
SCORE
Access Amenities Service Total
160 Dale-Tyler SB 35 2.00 1.00 0.00 3.00
564 Orangethorpe-Orangethorpe Park EB 26 1.88 1.31 0.00 3.18 593 Orangethorpe-Orangethorpe Park WB 101 1.88 1.54 0.00 3.41 5019 Embassy Suites North* WB 347 2.00 1.77 0.00 3.77
2014 City Hall SB* SB 25 2.75 1.08 0.00 3.83
512 Lincoln-Bel Air WB 118 1.88 1.23 1.00 4.11
60 Ball-Hampstead EB 282 2.13 1.54 0.50 4.16
72 Ball-Belhaven EB 81 1.88 1.92 0.50 4.30
450 Lincoln-Bel Air EB 422 1.88 1.00 1.50 4.38
8202 Via Burton-Daly EB 2 2.13 1.38 1.00 4.51
98 Ball-Sherrill WB 104 2.75 1.31 0.50 4.56
50 Ball-MacDuff EB 217 2.63 1.46 0.50 4.59
158 Dale-Lincoln NB 170 3.00 1.62 0.00 4.62
75 Ball-Belhaven WB 422 1.88 1.85 1.00 4.72
101 Ball-Beach WB 454 3.00 1.23 0.50 4.73
565 Orangethorpe-State College EB 317 3.25 1.54 0.00 4.79 3021 Walnut St. NB @ Katella Ave.* NB 95 2.25 1.54 1.00 4.79 88 Ball-Loara WB 473 2.63 1.69 0.50 4.82
126 Brookhurst-Niobe NB 89 1.88 1.62 1.50 4.99
87 Nall-Hampstead WB 168 2.50 2.00 0.50 5.00
319 Kraemer-Frontera SB 352 2.63 2.00 0.50 5.13
208 Euclid-Chalet SB 244 2.00 2.23 1.00 5.23
141 Brookhurst-Stoneybrook SB 224 2.13 2.62 0.50 5.24
105 Ball-Knott WB 167 2.88 1.92 0.50 5.30
71 Ball-State College EB 331 3.00 1.85 0.50 5.35
96 Ball-Webster WB 401 3.00 1.92 0.50 5.42
55 Ball-Empire EB 444 3.13 1.92 0.50 5.55
540 Magnolia-Winston SB 294 3.13 1.92 0.50 5.55
511 Lincoln-Dale WB 257 3.25 1.31 1.00 5.56
107 Beach-Rome NB 342 2.88 1.77 1.00 5.64
73 Ball-Sunkist EB 134 3.37 1.77 0.50 5.64
91 Ball-Nutwood WB 384 3.50 1.77 0.50 5.77
115 Beach-Stonybrook SB 401 2.25 1.54 2.00 5.79
95 Ball-Gilbert WB 435 3.38 1.92 0.50 5.80
183 Euclid-Palais NB 258 2.50 1.92 1.50 5.92
92 Ball-Empire WB 285 3.38 2.08 0.50 5.95
7143 Magnolia-Cerritos NB 345 3.00 2.00 1.00 6.00
298 Knott-Del Monte NB 106 1.88 2.15 2.00 6.03
185 Euclid-Crone NB 337 3.13 1.92 1.00 6.05
300 Knott-Del Monte SB 278 2.13 1.92 2.00 6.05
99 Ball-Dale WB 201 3.00 2.69 0.50 6.19
8146 Ball-Gaymont WB 119 3.37 1.85 1.00 6.22
196 Euclid-Medical Center SB 204 3.50 1.77 1.00 6.27
140 Brookhurst-Orange SB 483 3.00 2.77 0.50 6.27
517 Magnolia-Winston NB 200 3.13 2.23 1.00 6.36
297 Knott-Danbrook NB 170 2.50 1.92 2.00 6.42
301 Knott-Olinda SB 244 2.50 1.92 2.00 6.42
295 Knott-Rome NB 190 2.63 1.92 2.00 6.55
303 Knott-Savanna SB 370 2.63 1.92 2.00 6.55
469 Lincoln-Clementine EB 488 2.63 2.46 1.50 6.59
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report Stop ID Stop Name Dir.

Monthly
Ridership
SCORE
Access Amenities Service Total
205 Euclid-Orange SB 399 3.38 2.23 1.00 6.61
186 Euclid-Orange NB 285 2.63 3.00 1.00 6.63
306 Kraemer-Frontera NB 28 2.63 2.08 2.00 6.70
286 Katella-Walnut WB 417 2.38 1.85 2.50 6.72
471 Lincoln-Claudina EB 443 3.38 1.85 1.50 6.72
491 Lincoln-Anaheim WB 366 2.88 2.38 1.50 6.76
287 Katella-9th WB 467 2.63 1.77 2.50 6.89
672 State College-Chelsea SB 361 2.25 1.85 3.00 7.10
195 Euclid-Medical Center NB 190 3.50 2.92 1.00 7.42
304 Knott-Ball SB 339 3.38 2.08 2.00 7.45
663 State College-Via Burton NB 466 2.88 2.15 2.50 7.53 24 Anaheim-Lincoln** SB 3,413 2.29 2.77 2.50 7.55
14 Anaheim-Broadway NB 162 3.25 2.08 2.50 7.83
13 Anaheim-Santa Ana NB 139 3.38 2.00 2.50 7.88
294 Knott-Ball NB 385 3.12 2.77 2.00 7.89
250 Harbor-Katella** SB 6,959 3.14 3.23 4.00 10.37
Source: CR Associates
*Stops serviced by the Anaheim Transit Network (ATN), **Control Stops No stop achieved high scores in all three categories. Most stops exhibited layered issues across dimensions. Stops with poor service often also lacked shelter, real-time information, or basic pedestrian connections. Control stops (Harbor-Katella and Anaheim-Lincoln) were used to demonstrate the condition and quality present at high-ridership bus stops in high propensity areas.

Each control stops scored high, with Habor-Katella scoring (10.37 points) well above the highest scoring high propensity/low ridership stop analyzed (i.e. Knott-Ball at7.89 points).

Service subcategory scores were the lowest overall of any subcategory. Most stops scored below 2.0, with issues including infrequent headways, limited span of service, lack of real-time information, and minor schedule inconsistencies. Even well-designed stops struggled when service was weak.

Access subcategory scores were generally adequate (ranging between 1.5 and 3.5), though gaps in stop connectivity/accessibility persist. Most of Anaheim’s bus stops have sidewalks and curb ramps at the nearest intersections, though many were not adjacent to crosswalks or other comfortable street crossings (necessary to access the bus stop in the opposite travel direction on a potential return trip).

Most bus stops were not adjacent to bicycle facilities.

Amenities subcategory scores had the most varied results and were the most predictive of stop success. Only 7 stops had shelters. Seating, lighting, and shade were inconsistent. Call boxes, art, and branding were rare. Stops with stronger amenities often had better ridership even with limited service.

3.4.3 Bus Stop Recommendations
The findings from the composite and category-level bus stop scores reinforce the importance of addressing service quality, pedestrian connectivity, and comfort amenities in tandem—especially at stops with strong underlying transit demand. While no single factor explains low ridership on its own, the analysis revealed that most stops in this analysis suffer from a combination of limited service, incomplete access infrastructure, and inadequate passenger amenities. The following recommendations are informed by these patterns in order to guide both near-term upgrades and longterm planning.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report Service Improvements
• Coordinate with OCTA and ATN to implement 20-minute peak frequencies along key corridors. • Extend service span for stops to better match employer shifts, schools, and essential services. • Identify congested corridors for reliability treatments like queue jumps or signal priority.

Access Improvements
• Improve marked crosswalks and return stop proximity at priority locations. Consider mid-block crossings to help minimize safe crossings between return stops. • Ensure curb ramps and ADA-compliant sidewalks are continuous and connected. • Add bike racks or secure storage to support first/last mile options. • Work to ensure evolving ADA standards are met at all stops (e.g., appropriate landing and clearance space for bus-operated wheelchair lifts).

Amenity Improvements
• Install shelters and seating at stops with no seating or shade, prioritizing heat-vulnerable areas. • Add solar lighting and improve visibility through landscape trimming and shelter-mountedand/or pole-mounted lights. • Provide real-time information via solar-powered displays or posted QR codes. • Include trash bins and basic maintenance at all stops. • Encourage public art, local branding, and community partnership efforts to “adopt” stops.

Emerging Transit Options
This section describes non-infrastructure transportation strategies to consider for enhancing mobility in Anaheim, including Mobility as a Service (MaaS) and Microtransit—that can expand access, improve system integration, and better serve the diverse travel needs of residents, workers, and visitors. These strategies offer scalable, technology-enabled solutions that can fill service gaps, improve user convenience and regional connectivity.

3.5.1 Mobility as a Service
Mobility as a Service (MaaS) is a term used to describe the integration of local transportation service providers (both public and private) and their services into one technological platform with trip planning tools and trip booking/payment mechanisms.

MaaS may be an opportunity to streamline service and enable easier inter-agency transfers, particularly in Anaheim, where six different transit agencies operate. For example, transfer policies for ATN and OCTA do not align for OCTA pass holders and riders paying with cash. There are also no free transfers between LA Metro and ATN or between RTA and ATN. Some progress has been made regionally to streamline fare payments through the California Integrated Travel Project (Cal-ITP), an open-loop payment project which LA Metro is piloting. OCTA recently launched their new fare payment system, called Wave, which allows for payment using new reloadable transit smart cards, contactless credit/debit cards, and the new Wave mobile app. Integrated fare payment and fare payment standards would be a crucial component of MaaS implementation in Southern California.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report MaaS can also support activity at
mobility hubs, by providing the
technological platform through which
users can plan and source trips on
transit, shared vehicle fleets and/or
ride-hailing services. The Anaheim
Network for Accessible and Active
Multimodal Transit (ANNA) Plan and
OCTA Mobility Hubs Strategy have laid
initial groundwork by recommending
mobility hubs to enhance connectivity
between transit systems and
encourage multimodal trips.

Types of MaaS Systems
A MaaS system can vary in
implementation. Some systems are
transportation management platforms
are software products that feature
comprehensive travel tracking tools
and serve as a one-stop shop for
mobility options and incentives. Some platforms will include game elements (rewards, competitions, accolades, etc.) that encourage users to meet particular goals, like shifting trips away from driving to other modes. Multimodal trip planners are online or mobile platforms that help users decide between routes and modal options. These tools typically customize options based on the user's preferences (e.g., to optimize cost, time, or emissions). Some platforms enable users to plan trips in real time or in advance. Trip planners that aggregate multiple modes often include real-time information on arrivals, travel times, and availability. Smart mobility kiosks offer wayfinding and trip-planning information, including real-time transit availability, nearby shared mobility services, community attractions and services, and public amenities like phone-charging ports and public Wi-Fi.

3.5.2 Microtransit
Microtransit is an on-demand service that uses smaller vehicles to provide shared rides within a designated service area. Users book trips through an app, similar to ride-hailing services. Microtransit can be an option for first- and last-mile connectivity between regional rail stations and nearby lower density office and industrial parks that are difficult to serve with connecting transit routes, and/or to provide mobility in low-density communities that do not support fixed-route transit.

The City is exploring the feasibility of deploying microtransit for first- and last-mile connectivity in Anaheim Canyon. Anaheim Canyon may be a viable area for microtransit, given its many sidewalk gaps that make it difficult for potential riders to access existing fixed-route stops. In Anaheim Hills, the recent truncation of OCTA Route 38 may also be another potential opportunity area to deploy microtransit to fill in the void left by the removal of fixed-route service.

OCTA has a Community Based Transit Circulator Program (Project V) that could also help fill the gaps in transit service in Anaheim Hills. Project V provides Measure M2 competitive funding for local transit services that complement regional transit, such as deploying microtransit in areas to connect to fixedroute service.

Mobility hubs are a type of infrastructure, often sited next to major transit stations, where shared vehicle fleets are staged and other trip-making amenities are available. Their purpose is to facilitate trips involving a change in transportation modes, and to help reduce reliance on driving and automobile ownership. Graphic source: OCTA.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report Emerging Transit Technology
Looking toward the future, emerging transit technologies potentially offer powerful tools to modernize Anaheim’s transportation network. This section highlights two key areas driving this transformation:
smart fare technology and transit applications. Both play a vital role in streamlining operations, enhancing convenience, and fostering regional integration.

3.6.1 Smart Fare Technology
Smart fare technology creates a seamless, efficient, and user-friendly public transit experience. These technologies include contactless fare systems, credit card tap payment systems, mobile payment, and account-based fare collection to improve accessibility and reduce friction at boarding points. For Anaheim, the integration of smart fare systems can support growing demand while aligning with regional sustainability and equity goals.

Modern smart fare systems use technologies like contactless smart cards (e.g., TAP card in Los Angeles), mobile apps with QR or NFC (Near Field Communication) capabilities, and even open payment systems that allow riders to use their own credit/debit cards or mobile wallets (e.g., Apple Pay or Google Pay) allowing for fare capping, integrated transfers, and allowing for agencies to implement creative fare structures.

Table 3.4 - Smart Fare Technology
Technology Key Features Benefits
Contactless Smart
Cards
Reusable cards, reloadable at kiosks or
online Convenient, reduces paper tickets
Mobile Phone Ticketing App-based QR codes or NFC tap Widely accessible, supports real-time fare updates
Open Payment Systems Use of credit/debit or mobile wallets directly No need for special transit cards
Account-Based Ticketing Cloud-based fare accounts with fare capping Flexible, supports transfers and user profiles
Source: CR Associates
In Anaheim, implementing or expanding a unified fare payment system that spans ATN, regional bus, rail providers (e.g., OCTA and Metrolink), and potential future microtransit services can make interagency trips more convenient. Such systems can also incorporate features like:
• Fare capping to promote affordability
• Real-time balance and usage tracking through mobile platforms • Integration with trip-planning tools for seamless fare payment during route discovery • Equity-focused programs, such as reduced fares linked to eligibility databases The smart fare strategy should ensure integration with regional transportation networks, ADA compliance, and the inclusion of cash-load options through retail partners or kiosks, thereby maintaining accessibility for unbanked populations.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report

3.6.2 Transit Apps and Rider Tools
Transit applications are increasingly becoming the front door to mobility systems, serving as platforms not only for trip planning but also for real-time tracking, fare payment, service alerts, and multimodal integration. As Anaheim continues to evolve its transit infrastructure, robust transit app ecosystems will be important to driving adoption, particularly among tourists, casual riders, and tech-savvy residents. Modern transit apps offer far more than static schedules. They enable:
• Real-time vehicle tracking with predictive arrival times • Multi-agency trip planning, integrating regional bus, rail, microtransit, bike share, and ride-hail services
• Integrated fare purchasing and ticket validation
• Push notifications for service changes, disruptions, or detours • Crowd-sourced data to inform service improvements (e.g., reporting delays, cleanliness) Examples include Transit App, Moovit, and Citymapper, which are already in use across many Southern California cities. Anaheim can leverage existing platforms or develop a white-labeled app customized for all transportation options in Anaheim. For tourists, an intuitive interface with multilingual support and integration with popular travel apps like Google Maps or Apple Maps can enhance usability.

Table 3.5 - Typical Features Included in Transit Apps
App Feature Description Benefit
Real-Time Tracking Displays live vehicle locations and ETAs Reduces wait time uncertainty Multimodal Planning Integrates buses, trains, bikes, and ride-hailing Streamlines trip decisions Mobile Fare Payment Buy and use digital tickets in-app No need for cash or kiosks Service Alerts Push notifications on service changes Stay informed and adapt trips Crowdsourcing User feedback helps improve services Promotes responsiveness and trust Source: CR Associates
In parallel, since all transit agencies operating in Anaheim provide General Transit Feed Specification (GTFS) feeds, the City could explore expanding its use of Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) and open data protocols, such as GTFS-Realtime, to enable third-party apps to deliver up-to-date and accurate local transit information. Leveraging open data supports innovation and minimizes the need for continuous City-led app development.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report

4.0 Opportunities for Improving Transit in
Anaheim
This chapter identifies potential opportunities for improving transit in Anaheim based on the content presented earlier in this report and in the Existing Conditions Report. These opportunities form the basis of recommendations presented in the next chapter.

High transit propensity with low transit ridership along Ball Road High transit propensity areas with low transit ridership were identified along Ball Road in West Anaheim. These are areas which have the demographics to potentially generate more ridership and support transit service better than what current statistics are indicating.

Improving accessibility to transit in Anaheim Canyon with sidewalk infill The Existing Conditions Report identified numerous missing sidewalks in Anaheim Canyon. This part of Anaheim has good transit supportive (employment) density for bus service and includes a Metrolink station. The lack of sidewalks in many parts of that community create obstacles to using transit.

La Palma Avenue, Lincoln Avenue, Ball Road, and Anaheim Boulevard experience high variability in transit running times
There are four bus routes with a variability of four or more minutes in running time between the midday and PM peak hour. These routes include:
 OCTA Route 38 Westbound on La Palma Avenue
 OCTA Route 42/42A Eastbound on Lincoln Avenue
 OCTA Route 46 Westbound on Ball Road
 OCTA Route 47 Southbound on Anaheim Boulevard
These corridors are potential candidates for speed/reliability treatments, such as bus lanes, queue jumps, or transit signal priority. These recommendations can either be implemented as standalone improvements by the City or as part of a regional transit project.

The 2025 update to the OC Transit Vision Plan (OCTA’s long range/30-year transit plan) identified several Transit Opportunity Corridors (TOCs) for additional investments which could include more frequent service, high-capacity transit, and speed/reliability improvements (e.g., transit signal priority, queue jumps, dedicated lanes). Portions of La Palma Avenue and Lincoln Avenue were identified as TOCs in the OC Transit Vision Plan and may receive speed/reliability treatments by OCTA as part of the Plan. Ball Road and Anaheim Boulevard were not identified for any potential improvements in the OC Transit Vision Plan.

OCTA Routes 37, 38, 42/42A, 43, 46, 47, 50, and 57 are Anaheim’s top ridership routes OCTA buses play a vital role in providing circulation both within Anaheim and to neighboring cities. As documented in the Existing Conditions Report, there are nine OCTA bus routes that generate 2,000 or more boardings in Anaheim per weekday. They are as follows:
 Route 37 (Euclid Street)
 Route 38 (La Palma Avenue)
 Route 42/42A (Lincon Avenue)
 Route 43 (Harbor Boulevard)
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report  Route 46 (Ball Road)
 Route 47 (Anaheim Boulevard)
 Route 50 (Katella Avenue)
 Route 57 (State College Boulevard)
These routes are Anaheim’s highest ridership bus routes based on weekday ridership. Collectively, these nine routes transport almost 23,000 average weekday riders. These routes should be potential candidates for frequency increases or a high-capacity transit project, as it would provide the most benefit for transit riders in Anaheim.

OCTA OC Transit Vision Plan also identified five corridors within Anaheim as TOCs. These TOCs will be strong candidates for additional investments, such as more frequent service, high-capacity transit, and speed/reliability improvements (e.g., transit signal priority, queue jumps, dedicated lanes). Portions of Route 38 (La Palma Avenue), Route 42/42A (Lincoln Avenue), Route 43 (Harbor Boulevard), Route 50 (Katella Avenue), and Route 57 (State College Boulevard) were identified as TOCs in the OC Transit Vision Plan and may see improvements by OCTA. Route 37 (Euclid Street), Route 46 (Ball Road), and Route 47 (Anaheim Boulevard) were not identified for any potential improvements in the OC Transit Vision Plan, but nevertheless, could benefit from similar treatments Improving off-peak frequencies on high ridership routes A frequency analysis was conducted on OCTA routes, comparing weekday midday frequencies with PM peak frequencies. The analysis revealed that PM peak frequencies are higher on many corridors than in midday, with La Palma Avenue, Lincoln Avenue, Harbor Boulevard, and Katella Avenue having higher frequencies in at least one direction of travel. Notably, bus routes operating on La Palma Avenue (Route 38), Lincoln Avenue (Route 42/42A), Harbor Boulevard (Route 43), and Katella Avenue (Route 50) are among Anaheim’s top ridership routes yet receive less frequent service at midday.

These could be candidates for receiving higher frequencies in the off-peak. OCTA’s OC Transit Vision identified several TOC for additional investments which could include more frequent service, highcapacity transit, and speed/reliability improvements (e.g., transit signal priority, queue jumps, dedicated lanes). All four roadways identified by the Project Team are flagged as TOCs in the OC Transit Vision and may receive improved frequencies under OCTA’s plan.

Enhancing Metrolink service
As noted in the Existing Conditions Report, Metrolink service at the three stations serving Anaheim operates at relatively low frequencies. Metrolink generally provides hourly service during AM and PM peak periods; however, in the non-peak direction, some lines operate only every two hours. During the midday and evening periods, service operates every two to three hours. Weekend service is even less frequent, with some lines having just two trips in each direction per day. The infrequent Metrolink service makes it difficult to time connections with local bus service Furthermore, this infrequent service is not conducive to individuals who work atypical work schedules, travel outside peak periods, and/or reverse commute during peak periods.

While recent service improvements have been made, there remains an opportunity to further enhance rail service at these stations, which could strengthen regional connectivity and help maximize the value of existing capital investments.

Notably, there are two efforts planned to boost rail capacity in the corridor. First, the Metro Rail Network Integration (RNI) study identified a Metrolink tripper service operating between Chatsworth and Laguna Niguel that would provide an additional train once an hour from 6am to 10pm. There are Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report also plans to increase frequencies on the Pacific Surfliner to hourly by 2027, with a longer-term goal of 15 to 30-minute frequencies. The Metrolink enhancements identified as part of this study would complement and build upon these planned investments in the corridor.

Few shelters at bus stops
Only about one quarter of Anaheim’s 562 bus stops have shelters. No shelters at bus stops make waiting for transit uncomfortable and unattractive to some riders, especially for more physically vulnerable populations. Also, disadvantaged communities in Anaheim have proportionately fewer shelters (25%) than non-disadvantaged communities (30%). There is an opportunity to install more shelters throughout the city, as well as to more fairly balance the proportion of stops in disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged areas that have shelters.

Schedules for ATN bus routes
As documented in the Existing Conditions Report, ATN currently operates a headway-based system, meaning there is no published schedule, and buses arrive at predetermined frequencies, such as every 20 minutes. The frequency of service depends on the route and time of day, with service operating between 20 to 45 minutes. Since there is no published schedule, riders do not know when the next bus will arrive. Typically, headway-based service is operated by agencies that have service that is at least every 15 minutes or better.

ATN route alignments can be indirect
As documented in the Existing Conditions Report, while most routes operating in Anaheim are generally direct and easy to navigate, there are opportunities to optimize the geometry of certain ATN routes.

Some of ATN’s routes have one-way loops, or double overlapping loops, which are more circuitous than direct routes and can also be confusing for passengers. Refining the geometry of the most indirect ATN routes could help improve clarity and efficiency for riders.

Fares, transfer policies, and methods of payment vary by operator As documented in the Existing Conditions Report, there is considerable variability in the adult cash fare across providers. The difference is most notable between ATN ($4.00) and OCTA ($2.00), two of Anaheim’s biggest transit operators. Also notable is the complexity of the transfer policies between providers. Transfers between OCTA and ATN are available for OCTA passholders only (cash-only single rider ATN passengers are ineligible), and there are no free transfers between LA Metro and ATN, or between RTA and ATN.

Also, each agency also has different fare payment methods (e.g., bespoke apps, transit cards, and contactless credit/debit cards). There is an opportunity to coordinate fares and transfer policies across the different providers, as well as to standardize the payment methods that are accepted. OCTA is currently working on a new fare payment system. OCTA recently launched their new fare payment system, called Wave, which allows for payment using new reloadable transit smart cards, contactless credit/debit cards, and the new Wave mobile app. Fare capping is also now available. ATN already utilizes Tap2Ride technology.

Bus stop signage
Signage at ATN bus stops is difficult to identify from long distances. The signs are non-standard and utilize rectangular sign holders placed on the pole, below eye level, with small text and a QR code. At stops shared with OCTA, they can be mistaken for a sign to download an app for OCTA real-time arrivals.

An improved design (with larger signage) will make it easier to identify ATN bus stops.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report Signage at OCTA stops often lacks information on which routes serve the stop. It is recommended that OCTA stops in Anaheim include route information at the stop location.

Information could be provided more intuitively on ATN’s website and app Service information is not available on the ATN website. Notably, details like service hours and headway information are not posted on the individual Anaheim Regional Transportation (ART) route and Everyone Ventures Everywhere (EVE) webpages. The information that is available on the website and the app .is also difficult to navigate.

Microtransit in Anaheim Hills
At their current densities, most of Anaheim Hills, except for the Festival Shopping Center, cannot adequately support fixed-route service but instead could be a good candidate for microtransit service.

The area recently lost fixed-route service in the summer of 2024 when Route 38 was shortened to terminate at Fairmont Boulevard. As such, there is no longer bus service on La Palma Boulevard east of that location, (including service to Anaheim Hills Festival Marketplace).

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report

5.0 Project Goals, Recommendations, and
Evaluation Results
This chapter outlines the strategic framework developed to guide the Anaheim Transit Master Plan recommendations, ensuring that future investments and policy decisions align with Anaheim’s mobility, vision, and community priorities. Seven overarching goals were identified to affirm the City's values of accessibility, equity, sustainability, and economic development.

Each recommendation in this chapter was designed to support one or more of these goals and evaluated against a clear set of metrics to ensure measurable outcomes. Together, these goals, metrics, and recommendations provide a transparent and actionable roadmap to enhance transit service in Anaheim—both in the short term and long term. These recommendations are intended to be a starting point for initial policy discussions and will be presented to the public and community stakeholders for input.

Project Goals
The seven goals are described in this section.

Goal 1: Improve Transit Access
The primary aim of this goal is to increase the number of people who can access transit services in Anaheim. Transit access is defined as having the ability to reach and use transit services. For fixedroute service, transit access involves two components: being able to get to the bus stop (i.e., making sure there is appropriate pedestrian infrastructure) and having service within a reasonable walking distance of trip origins and destinations. There are four metrics to measure this goal, as follows:
 Change in number of people within ¼ mile of stops for fixed routes (or in on-demand zones)  Change in number of jobs within ¼ mile of stops for fixed routes (or in on-demand zones)  Change in amount of missing sidewalk within a half mile from top ridership stops  Improved customer experience with services or at stops Goal 2: Improve Transit Mobility
This goal seeks to improve mobility in Anaheim and between neighboring cities, and the broader region. Mobility is different than access (Goal 1) because mobility is focused on the connectivity of the network and the less tangible aspects of travel, like reliability of service and the amount of time it takes to get to a destination. There are two metrics to measure this goal, as follows:
 Increases the number of people who can reach top destination areas in under an hour on transit
 Potential to reduce travel times and/or improve service reliability for transit passengers The top destination areas used in this metric are (1) Disneyland, Convention Center; (2) Anaheim Regional Intermodal Transportation Center (ARTIC), The Grove, Anaheim Stadium, Honda Center; and (3) Downtown Anaheim, Pearson Park Amphitheater.

Goal 3: Improving Transit to Benefit Low-Income Households and Low-Wage Employment Areas Low-income households typically rely on public transit for their transportation needs. Implementing service improvements or infrastructure enhancements in areas with higher concentrations of these characteristics improves transportation equity, access to opportunity and benefits a significantly large transit user demographic. There are two metrics to measure this goal:

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report  Improved first- and last-mile connectivity to bus stops and stations  Improved connectivity in disadvantaged/Environmental Justice communities Goal 4: Minimize Environmental Impacts
Improving transit access and mobility will increase transit ridership, which in turn helps reduce vehicle miles traveled and the associated environmental impacts. Another environmental goal is to minimize the amount of impact/disruption to residents and businesses during the construction of a capital project. There are three metrics to measure this goal, as follows:
 Potential to reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT)
 Potential to increase transit ridership
 Potential for impacts to adjacent residents/businesses due to construction Goal 5: Support and Encourage Economic Development
Improving transit service (and rider experience) to and from the three largest destination areas in Anaheim today: The Resort, The Platinum Triangle, and Downtown Anaheim will support and encourage local economic activity. There are two metrics to measure this goal, as follows:
 Improves service (hours and/or frequency) to the top 3 destination areas  Improves transit stop/station amenities in the top 3 destination areas The top destination areas used in this metric were (1) Disneyland and the Convention Center; (2) ARTIC, The Grove, Anaheim Stadium, and Honda Center; and (3) Downtown Anaheim and Pearson Park Amphitheater.

Goal 6: Rapid Implementation of Projects
This goal aims to measure how quickly the City of Anaheim can implement the recommendations that have been identified. Improvements within the control of the City that require less coordination with other parties can be implemented sooner. Similarly, improvements that do not involve design/permitting can take less time and can be implemented sooner. There are three metrics to measure this goal, as follows:
 Within the control of the City
 Ability to implement in a near-term timeframe (within three years)  Supported by the community

Goal 7: Serve Targeted Growth Areas
This goal focuses on improving transit to areas in Anaheim that are expected to experience the largest gains in population and/or employment over the next 20 years. These parts of the city include the Resort, Anaheim Canyon, and the Platinum Triangle. Although there is overlap with current destination areas, prioritizing transit investments in these targeted areas will support future economic development while also mitigating potential traffic congestion and associated environmental impacts.

There are two metrics to measure this goal:
 Improves service (hours and/or frequency) to the three main targeted growth areas  Improves and increases amenities in the three main targeted growth areas Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report Evaluation Criteria
Table 5.1 provides an overview of the qualitative metrics and threshold definitions used to score each recommendation in relation to the goals defined in the preceding section. Each metric was scored on a scale from three (3) to negative three (-3) points.

Table 5.1 - Evaluation Criteria with Scoring Thresholds Goal 1: Improve Transit Access
Metric Points Threshold Definition

1.1 Change in number of people within
¼ mile of stops for fixed routes (or in
on-demand zones)
3 Increases number of people who can access transit
0 No change
-3 Decreases number of people who can access transit

1.2 Change in number of jobs within ¼
mile of stops for fixed routes (or in ondemand zones)
3 Increases number of jobs who can access transit
0 No change
-3 Decreases number of jobs who can access transit

1.3 Change in amount of missing
sidewalk within a half mile from top
ridership stops
3 Improves missing sidewalk gaps near transit
0 No change
-3 Worsens missing sidewalk gaps near transit

1.4 Improves customer experience
with services or at stops
3 Improves customer experience
0 No change
-3 Worsens customer experience
Goal 2: Improve Transit Mobility

2.1 Increases number of people who
can reach top destination areas* in
under an hour on transit
3 Increases number of people who can reach three top
destination areas
2 Increases number of people who can reach two top
destination areas
1 Increases number of people who can reach one top
destination area
0 No change
-3 Decreases number of people who can reach three top
destination areas

2.2 Potential to reduce travel times
and improve service reliability for
transit passengers
3 Improves travel time and reliability
0 No change
-3 Worsens travel time and reliability
* (1) Disneyland, Convention Center; (2) ARTIC, The Grove, Anaheim Stadium, Honda Center; (3) Downtown Anaheim, Pearson Park Amphitheater
Source: CR Associates, Nelson\Nygaard
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report Goal 3: Improving Transit to Benefit Low-Income Households and Low-Wage Employment Areas Metric Points Threshold Definition

3.1 Improves first- and last-mile
connectivity to bus stops and stations
3 Improves first-last mile connectivity
0 No change
-3 Worsens first-last mile connectivity

3.2 Improves connectivity in
disadvantaged/EJ communities
3 Improves connectivity in disadvantaged/EJ communities 0 No impact
-3 Decreases connectivity to disadvantaged/EJ communities Goal 4: Minimize Environmental Impacts

4.1 Potential to increase transit
ridership
3 Increases transit ridership
0 No change
-3 Decreases transit ridership

4.2 Potential for impacts to adjacent
residents/businesses due to
construction
3 No impact on adjacent residents/businesses
0 Minimal impact to adjacent residents/businesses
-3 Major impact to adjacent residents/businesses

4.3 Potential to reduce vehicle miles
traveled (VMT)
3 Reduces VMT
0 No change
-3 Increases VMT
Goal 5: Support and Encourage Economic Development

5.1 Improves service (hours and/or
frequency) to top 3 destination areas*
3 Increases service to three top destination areas
2 Increases service to two top destination areas
1 Increases service to one top destination area
0 No change
-3 Decreases service to three top destination areas

5.2 Improves transit stop/station
amenities in the top 3 destination
areas*
3 Improves amenities at three top destination areas
2 Improves amenities at two top destination areas
1 Improves amenities at one top destination area
0 No change
-3 Worsens amenities at three top destination areas
* (1) Disneyland, Convention Center; (2) ARTIC, The Grove, Anaheim Stadium, Honda Center; (3) Downtown Anaheim, Pearson Park Amphitheater
Source: CR Associates, Nelson\Nygaard
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report Goal 6: Rapid Implementation of Projects
Metric Points Threshold Definition

6.1 Within the control of the City 3 Within control of City 0 Partially within control of City
-3 Outside control of City

6.2 Ability to implement quickly
3 High ability for quick implementation
0 Average ability for quick implementation
-3 Low ability for quick implementation

6.3 Supported by the community 3 High community support 0 Average community support
-3 Low community support
Goal 7: Serve Targeted Growth Areas

7.1 Improves service (hours
and/or frequency) to the three big
growth areas*
3 Increases service to three top growth areas
2 Increases service to two top growth areas
1 Increases service to one top growth area
0 No change
-3 Decreases service to three top growth areas

7.2 Improves and increases
amenities in the three big growth
areas*
3 Improves amenities at three top growth areas
2 Improves amenities at two top growth areas
1 Improves amenities at one top growth area
0 No change
-3 Worsens amenities at three top growth areas
*Resort Area, Anaheim Canyon, Platinum Triangle
Source: CR Associates, Nelson\Nygaard
Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report Potential Recommendations
This section presents draft recommendations. The goals presented earlier in this report were used as the guiding principles behind these recommendations. Twelve different recommendations were developed. Each recommendation is described below. These recommendations are considered draft and will need to be presented to the public and community stakeholders for feedback. Based on the feedback received, the recommendations will be refined appropriately prior inclusion in the final plan.

Recommendation 1: Pilot Microtransit Service in Anaheim Canyon and/or Anaheim Hills In August 2024, Route 38 was shortened to terminate at Fairmont Boulevard. This change eliminated service on La Palma Boulevard east of that location, including to the Festival Marketplace. Transit users on this discontinued segment no longer have access to this area by fixed route or by OC ACCESS.

In Anaheim Canyon, the Existing Conditions Report identified numerous missing sidewalks. While this area has employment densities to support fixed-route service, the lack of sidewalks makes it difficult for individuals to utilize the existing fixed-route bus service, especially for first-/last-mile connections from the Anaheim Canyon Station.

To improve transit access to Anaheim Hills and Anaheim Canyon, it is recommended that microtransit service be evaluated for feasibility, and if potentially feasible, by piloted in these areas. Pilot service(s) being deployed for a set period will allow the City and its potential operator to test the market for such a service(s), get community feedback, and determine if it makes sense to make the service(s) permanent. Strong performance metrics should be developed before the launch of any pilot program(s) to determine how success is defined and measured so that objective evaluations for making the service(s) permanent can be conducted. OCTA’s Project V program should be considered as a potential funding source for an Anaheim Hills circulator.

Recommendation 2: Introduce More Amenities at Bus Stops Few bus stops in Anaheim have benches or shelters, which can make waiting for transit uncomfortable and unattractive to some riders, especially for vulnerable populations. Shelters are particularly valuable amenities in Southern California due to the hot and sunny climate, yet only about 26% of bus stops in Anaheim have shelters. Other amenities, like real-time transit information, can improve the rider experience by helping riders know when the next bus is coming.

To improve customer experience at bus stops, it is recommended that more amenities be installed at bus stops, such as shelters, seating/leaning opportunities, and real-time arrival signs.

Recommendation 3: Implement Schedule for ATN Bus Routes ATN currently operates a headway-based system, meaning there is no published schedule timetable, and buses arrive at predetermined frequencies, such as every 20 minutes. Since there is no published schedule, riders do not know when the next bus will arrive and can end up showing up at the stop just as a bus is departing. Typically, headway-based service is operated by agencies that have service that is at least every 15 minutes or better. Since ATN operates its service less frequently (20 to 45 minutes, depending on the route and time of day), this can result in very long wait times for passengers.

To improve customer experience and reduce waiting times, it is recommended that ATN publish a schedule that customers can refer to. This schedule could be posted on ATN’s website, at stops, and as pamphlets at hotels/businesses.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report Recommendation 4: Streamline and Simplify ATN Bus Routes Several ATN bus routes are circuitous, this can increase travel times and can be difficult for riders to understand. Some routes combine during midday, which means segments of two routes run on a single alignment. These alignments can make the fixed-route bus network challenging to navigate, especially for users not familiar with the system. Many ATN’s routes also do not have bi-directional stop pairs, meaning there is only one stop on one side of the street. This effectively makes the single stop operate as a one-way loop – riders will have a short trip in one direction, but in the other direction, the rider must ride through the entire route to get to their destination.

To improve customer service and reduce travel times, it is recommended that ATN bus routes be streamlined and simplified. This could involve exploring alternate route alignments, re-examining the practice of combining routes at midday, and/or examining the stops that are causing deviations to be made. Bi-directional stop pairs should also be implemented, where feasible and pertinent to the ATN service model.

Recommendation 5: Improve ATN Mobile App and Website Information Transit agencies use their websites to inform riders of bus schedules, routes, and other pertinent information on how to use the system. ATN’s websites lack some of the service information users need to rely on, such as when and how frequently routes operate. While the information may be available on the mobile app, the app is also difficult for some people to navigate.

To improve customer experience and help riders plan their trips better, it is recommended that ATN includes service information on its website and make the mobile app easier to use.

Recommendation 6: Increase Sign Visibility at Bus Stops Signage at bus stops in Anaheim can be difficult to identify from long distances. ATN signs are often placed in sign holders on a pole, below eye level, with small text and a QR code. Aside from the visibility issues, the signs can also be mistaken as an advertisement for an app. Additionally, OCTA signs often do not include which routes stop at the stop, nor do they include schedule information.

To improve customer experience, it is recommended that transit agencies or the City design and install more traditional bus stop signs to clearly mark bus stops, the routes that serve the stops, and information about the routes, such as headway and graphics of the route alignment. In places where OCTA and ATN share the same stop, an ATN sign could be placed below the existing OCTA sign.

Recommendation 7: Fill Gaps in Missing Sidewalks
Missing sidewalks can have a direct impact on transit ridership because riders cannot take the bus if they cannot safely access the stop. La Palma Avenue and Miraloma Avenue in Anaheim Canyon have employment densities that could support fixed-route service, but there are significant sidewalk gaps along these corridors adding to the difficulty of accessing bus stops. There are also many sidewalk gaps in the vicinity of industrial areas in the Platinum Triangle and the Anaheim Canyon Metrolink stations.

To increase access to bus stops and rail stations, it is recommended that the City fill in gaps in the sidewalk network.

Recommendation 8: High-Capacity Transit on Major Corridors OCTA Routes 37 (Euclid Street), 38 (La Palma Avenue), 42/42A (Lincoln Avenue), 43/543 (Harbor Boulevard), 46 (Ball Road), 47 (Anaheim Boulevard), 50 (Katella Avenue), and 57 (State College Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report Boulevard) are Anaheim’s highest ridership routes. Collectively, these routes have almost 23,000 boardings in Anaheim for a typical weekday. These routes operate on major north-south and east-west corridors in Anaheim and play a key role in providing mobility both within Anaheim and to neighboring cities. These routes are strong candidates for high-capacity transit service.

OCTA’s OC Transit Vision plan identified five corridors within Anaheim as TOCs. These TOCs can potentially be candidates for additional investments which could include more frequent service, highcapacity transit, and speed/reliability improvements (e.g., transit signal priority, queue jumps, dedicated lanes). Portions of Routes 38, 42/42A, 43, 47, and 50 are flagged as TOCs in the OC Transit Vision. OCTA also recently extended OC Bus Rapid Route 553 from ARTIC to the Resort Area as a way to serve increased demand due to OC Vibe, the Anaheim Resort expansion, and the 2028 Olympic and Paralympic Games.

To improve connectivity within Anaheim and to adjacent jurisdictions, it is recommended that the City (with OCTA and other appropriate stakeholders) consider the implementation of high-capacity transit service on Euclid Street, La Palma Avenue, Lincoln Avenue, Harbor Boulevard, Ball Road, Anaheim Boulevard, Katella Avenue, and/or State College Boulevard.

Recommendation 9: More Frequent OCTA Service on Top Ridership Routes OCTA’s top ridership routes, with about 2,000 or more average weekday boardings, are:
 Route 37 (Euclid Street)
 Route 38 (La Palma Avenue)
 Route 42/42A (Lincon Avenue)
 Route 43/543 (Harbor Boulevard)
 Route 46 (Ball Road)
 Route 47 (Anaheim Boulevard)
 Route 50 (Katella Avenue)
 Route 57 (State College Boulevard)
All of the listed routes operate with 15- to 20-minute frequencies during the AM and PM peak periods, except for Routes 37 and 46, which operate every 30 minutes all day. During the midday and evening periods, service is generally less frequent, operating as infrequently as every 30 minutes. On weekends, many of these routes operate anywhere between 25- to 60-minute frequencies.

The OC Transit Vision identifies several TOCs for additional investments which could include more frequent service, high-capacity transit, and speed/reliability improvements (e.g., transit signal priority, queue jumps, dedicated lanes). La Palma Avenue, Lincoln Avenue, Harbor Boulevard, Katella Avenue, and State College Boulevard are flagged as TOCs in the OC Transit Vision.

Improving frequencies to at least every 15 minutes all day seven days a week on these eight routes would improve mobility for about 23,000 average weekday riders in Anaheim, as well as improve connectivity within Anaheim and to neighboring jurisdictions. Frequency improvements on these routes can be the initial building blocks for any high-capacity transit service proposed as part of the previous recommendation (High-Capacity Transit on Major Corridors).

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report Recommendation 10: More Frequent Off-Peak and Weekend Metrolink Service Metrolink generally operates at one-hour frequencies during the AM and PM peak commute periods.

During AM and PM peak commute periods, some lines operate service every two hours in the nonpeak direction. During the midday and evening periods, service operates every two to three hours. On weekends, service is less frequent, with some lines having two trips in each direction. Infrequent service makes it difficult to time connections to local bus service and necessitates the operation of duplicative regional bus service. Furthermore, infrequent service is not conducive to individuals who work atypical work schedules, travel outside peak periods (including attending events at OC Vibe, Angel Stadium, and the Resort), and/or reverse commute during the peak periods.

The 2021 LOSSAN Rail Corridor Optimization Study included a similar recommendation for the Pacific Surfliner to provide hourly service by 2027 and a long-term goal of 15 to 30-minute frequency. The Metro Rail Network Integration (RNI) study identified a Metrolink tripper service operating between Chatsworth and Laguna Niguel that would provide an additional train once an hour from 6 AM to 10 PM. Frequent rail service is of growing importance in this region to help achieve congestion reduction, environmental, and sustainable development goals.

To improve regional connections and support non-peak travel, it is recommended that more frequent Metrolink service be provided during off-peak commute periods including special events and weekends, as well as in the non-peak direction during the AM and PM peak commute periods.

Recommendation 11: Speed and Reliability Improvements on Major Corridors Differences in scheduled running times between the peak and off-peak periods can be an indicator of speed and reliability problems on a bus route, which can cause poor on-time performance. Four bus routes/directions with a variability of four or more minutes in running time between the midday and PM peak hour were identified:
 OCTA Route 38 Westbound on La Palma Avenue
 OCTA Route 42/42A Eastbound on Lincoln Avenue
 OCTA Route 46 Westbound on Ball Road
 OCTA Route 47 Southbound on Anaheim Boulevard
The OC Transit Vision identified several TOCs for additional investments which could include more frequent service, high-capacity transit, and speed/reliability improvements (e.g., transit signal priority, queue jumps, dedicated lanes). Portions of La Palma Avenue (Route 38), Lincoln Avenue (Routes 42/42A), and Anaheim Boulevard (Route 47) are flagged as TOCs in the OC Transit Vision.

The City has also expressed a desire to have speed and reliability improvements along Katella Avenue to support mobility needs associated with the 2028 Summer Olympics. Anaheim will be hosting events at the Honda Center and Katella Avenue will be the major roadway connecting to the venue.

Improvements along Katella Avenue will ensure transit service can quickly move large numbers of people reliably to/from the venue, providing a competitive alternative to driving.

To improve customer experience and service reliability, it is recommended that La Palma Avenue, Lincoln Avenue, Ball Road, Anaheim Boulevard, and Katella Avenue be examined for speed and reliability improvements, which can include bus-only lanes, queue jumps, and transit signal priority.

Improvements to these roadways can be the initial building blocks for any type of high-capacity transit service proposed as part of the High-Capacity Transit on Major Corridors recommendation.

Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report Recommendation 12: Simplify Fare Structures and Establish Transfer Agreements Currently, the different transit providers operating in Anaheim have different fare structures and various methods to pay fares (e.g., bespoke apps, transit cards, and contactless credit/debit cards).

ATN also does not have transfer agreements with some agencies, some trips involving a transfer to or from ATN are required to pay a second fare. This patchwork of different fare policies can result in customer confusion, especially for new or international riders who are trying to navigate how to pay.

OCTA recently launched their new fare payment system, called Wave, which allows for payment using new reloadable transit smart cards, contactless credit/debit cards, and the new Wave mobile app.

Fare capping is also now available. ATN already utilizes Tap2Ride technology.

To reduce confusion and improve customer experience, it is recommended that the transit providers serving Anaheim work on standardizing fares and methods of payment, as well as establishing transfer agreements where they are not already in place. Potential Fare capping should also be explored as a way to reduce costs for transit riders by not charging more than the price of a daily or monthly transit pass.

Recommendation 13: Implement East-West Connector Between ARTIC and Convention Center ARTIC features regional rail connections (Metrolink and Amtrak), intercity bus service (Greyhound and FlixBus), and local bus connections (OCTA and ATN). ARTIC is located a short distance away from the Convention Center and Resort Area, which are major destinations in Anaheim. The previous Anaheim Transit Master Plan identified an elevated fixed guideway system connecting ARTIC to the Resort Area and the City would like to see this improvement implemented. This connection would enhance connectivity to and from existing transit services at ARTIC, improving transit access for residents, visitors, and workers.

Adding a grade-separated transit connection between the Convention Center and ARTIC would provide high-quality and reliable transit to thousands of people living and working in and around these areas.

It is recommended that this concept continue to be evaluated/discussed with key stakeholders and an alternatives analysis be conducted to identify an appropriate mode and preferred alignment.

Recommendations Evaluation
This section presents the results of the scoring evaluation conducted for each of the 13 recommendations. The evaluation utilized the scoring criteria presented in Section 5.2, and the scores were then averaged for each of the seven goals. The results of the evaluation are shown in Table 5.2.

Transit Network Framework
The analyses presented in this report inform a preliminary Transit Network Framework that will serve as the foundation for developing the Draft and Final Anaheim Transit Master Plan updates. This framework reflects major findings, including key corridors with strong ridership potential, areas of high transit propensity that remain underserved, and opportunities to simplify and streamline existing transit services. It identifies proposed service improvements such as pilot microtransit services in Anaheim Canyon and Anaheim Hills, expanded off-peak and weekend Metrolink service, more frequent OCTA service on top ridership routes, and high-capacity transit on major corridors.

Other recommendations include enhanced amenities at bus stops, implementation of schedules for ATN routes, upgrades to the ATN mobile app and website, increased sign visibility at stops, sidewalk Anaheim Transit Master Plan
FINAL Task 3 – Market Analysis, Constraints & Initial Recommendations Report gap closures, speed and reliability improvements, and simplified fare structures with potential transfer agreements. These elements collectively outline a vision for a more connected, efficient, and equitable transit network in Anaheim. Ultimately, these recommendations are visionary ideas that will require more analysis, planning, and coordination with stakeholders before adoption and implementation. As such, the recommendations are not financially constrained but are instead a framework for a longterm vision to inform planning and policy decisions. The findings and proposed improvements will be vetted through engagement with the public and technical working groups before being documented in the Final Transit Master Plan.