Anaheim City Council
May 12, 2026

ANAHEIM CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 24, 2026
The regular meeting of February 24, 2026 was called to order at 4:00 P.M. in the Council Chamber of Anaheim City Hall, located at 200 South Anaheim Boulevard. The meeting notice, agenda, and related material were duly posted on February 19, 2026.

MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ashleigh E. Aitken and Council Members Carlos A. Leon, Ryan Balius, Natalie Rubalcava, Norma Campos Kurtz, Kristen M. Maahs, and Natalie Meeks.

STAFF PRESENT: Assistant City Manager Greg Garcia, City Attorney Robert Fabela, and City Clerk Theresa Bass
ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO CLOSED SESSION: None
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS: None
CLOSED SESSION: At 4:01 p.m., Mayor Aitken recessed to Closed Session for consideration of the following:

1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION (Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of California Government Code Section 54956.9): One potential case

2. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT
(Subdivision (b)(1) of Section 54957 of the California Government Code) Title: Interim City Manager

3. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
(Subdivision (a) of Section 54957.6 of the California Government Code) Agency Designated Representative: Linda Andal, Human Resources Director Title: Interim City Manager
At 5:00 p.m., Mayor Aitken reconvened the Anaheim City Council.

MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ashleigh E. Aitken and Council Members Carlos A. Leon, Ryan Balius, Natalie Rubalcava, Norma Campos Kurtz, Kristen M. Maahs, and Natalie Meeks.

INVOCATION: Reverend Dr. Joel Van Soelen, Anaheim Christian Reformed Church Prior to the Flag Salute, Council Member Maahs took a moment to recognize the men and women who have served the country.

FLAG SALUTE: Council Member Kristen M. Maahs
PRESENTATIONS: Recognizing Cypress College Foundation’s 51st Americana Awards Honorees Mayor Aitken recognized Cypress College Foundation’s Americana Awards Citizens of the Year for Anaheim, Alden and Linda Esping. She shared that for more than 60 years, the Espings have poured their hearts into the City, bettering the lives of kids and families and strengthening Anaheim. She ITEM # 20
City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026

noted that they are teachers, mentors, and a steady presence when students needed encouragement, guidance, or someone to believe in them. She stated that from 1963 to 2011, they both served as educators in the Anaheim Union High School District. She highlighted the impact that they’ve had over the five decades they taught. She shared that Mr. Esping’s services extended from the Anaheim Family YMCA, the City’s Planning Commission, Senior Citizen Commission, and Chamber of Commerce. She added that Mr. Esping has been honored as Ambassador of the Year by the Chamber, Orange County Teacher of the Year, and a Friend of Education. Mayor Aitken shared that Ms. Esping has served on the Library Board, advising and coaching through Kiwanis Bowl, and supporting groups such as Cop4Kids, Caterina’s Club, the Tiger Woods Foundation and the Anaheim Community Foundation. She added that Ms. Esping was named South Junior High School Teacher of the Year and Kiwanis Bowl Coach of the Year. She noted that the Espings invested in the City and helped build generations. On behalf of the City, she recognized Alden and Linda Esping as the 51st Americana Citizens of the Year.

Howard Kummerman, Executive Director of the Cypress College Foundation, noted that the event helps more than 7,000 students who attend Cypress College from the City. He added that the Foundation gives away nearly $1,000,000 in proceeds to the students. He explained that the efforts are due to citizens like the Espings who make a difference. He announced that the event will be held on March 21st. He presented Mayor Aitken with a copy of a 50th Anniversary book for her and the Library.

Recognizing Chain Reaction Music Venue for operating in the City of Anaheim for nearly 30 years

Mayor Aitken reported that for nearly 30 years, Chain Reaction was an all-ages place for live music, especially for young fans, without many places to go. She shared that Chain Reaction was a subcultural icon, hosting up-and-coming punk, emo, and other alternative bands, including early shows for Fall Out Boy, Paramore, and My Chemical Romance. She added that Chain Reaction gave bands an opportunity to be heard long before gaining widespread recognition and gave fans an opportunity to watch their first show. She noted that the venue created a sense of belonging in a space that welcomed young people exactly as they were and rising artists, a place to connect directly with the audience. She shared that Chain Reaction’s closure reflects an increasingly challenging environment for small music venues. She recognized the cultural and community impact Chain Reaction had in Anaheim. She shared that Chain Reaction will forever be part of the City’s live music history. She thanked Council Member Maahs for bringing the recognition forward. She invited Andy Serrao to accept the recognition and thanked Chain Reaction for nearly 30 years of dedication to live music in the community.

Andy Serrao expressed appreciation to the City for its longstanding support of the venue, noting the venue’s role as a safe community space for generations of artists and fans to discover and support the arts. He highlighted various City departments’ assistance, including Planning, Police, and Fire, in helping sustain the venue and its programming. He thanked the City for its partnership and support.

ACCEPTANCE OF OTHER RECOGNITIONS (To be presented at a later date):

Recognizing February 22-28, 2026, as National Engineers Week At 5:12 p.m., Mayor Aitken called to order the Anaheim Housing Authority, in joint session with the City Council.

ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDAS: None
City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026

PUBLIC COMMENTS (all agenda items, except public hearings): Prior to receipt of public comments, City Clerk Theresa Bass provided an outline of procedures for public comments, notice of translation services, and a brief decorum statement.

City Clerk Theresa Bass reported that a total of 72 public comments were received electronically prior to 3:00 P.M. [A final total of 79 public comments were received electronically, distributed to the City Council, and made part of the official records]. – See Appendix.

R. Joshua Collins addressed the City Council regarding homelessness and affordable housing. He emphasized the need for additional affordable housing units and expand shelter options to address homelessness in the community. He urged the City to prioritize basic needs for vulnerable residents He urged the City to consider implementing income-based fines to help prevent homelessness and expand support and outreach services for unhoused individuals. He encouraged continued action and collaboration for affordable housing in the Maxwell Park area.

Paul Hyek shared information regarding a potential program being developed by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) that would allow individuals with rent-to-own vouchers to purchase homes obtained through foreclosures. He reported that there are State laws regulating e- bike use and sales to underage riders. He requested assistance from the City Council to coordinate with the GardenWalk and the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) to allow bus drivers to use restroom facilities before 10 a.m. due to construction at Disneyland.

Janis Heckel, Executive Director of the Anaheim Community Foundation, expressed gratitude on behalf of the Anaheim Community Foundation Board of Directors, for the consideration of the Lease Agreement for the property located at 883 S. Anaheim Boulevard. She shared that the City Council’s support represents an investment in people, partnerships, and hope for residents across Anaheim.

She added that property would serve as a hub where organizations meet, share resources, build partnerships, and develop innovative solutions to support Anaheim residents. She shared that the Foundation is excited about restoring the spirit of the Anaheim Hive, which closed due to redevelopment. She added that the Foundation would host an open house to welcome new neighbors, community partners, and the public. She thanked the City Council for their leadership and commitment to the community.

Orailia Felix provided an update on the work Disney has been doing in the Anaheim community and at the Disneyland Resort. She reported that on February 3rd, the Disneyland Resort surprised the Anaheim Track team with two one-day park hopper tickets to enjoy the theme parks during the summer. She shared that Mickey Mouse joined for a special appearance with the team. She added that the Disneyland Resort engages with workforce development efforts with Anaheim youth each month during the school year. She noted that volunteers from Disneyland Resort host five workshops supporting career readiness for nearly 350 students from four different high schools in Anaheim, including Loara, Savanna, Magnolia, and Anaheim High Schools. She shared that the workshops are offered in collaboration with Big Brothers/Big Sisters of Orange County and Orange County United Way to provide one-on-one mentoring opportunities for students and career development skills. She shared that the Resort recently held the Run Disney 5K and Half Marathon races. She added that Disney worked with Big Brothers/Big Sisters of Orange County raising $50,000 for a charity for the race to continue their work supporting youth in Anaheim. She highlighted the conclusion of the Lunar New Year Festival. She added that Napa Rose, recently completed an extensive renovation and welcomed guests with a reimagined space and new menu. She reported that the Disney California Food and Wine Festival would return March 5 to April 27, 2026.

City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026

Hillary Lacher invited the Mayor, City Council, and community to attend the 150th celebration honoring E. Kate Rea on Saturday, March 21st from 4 p.m. to 6 p.m. She shared that Ms. Rea was an educator and civic leader whose dedication shaped the Anaheim community. She noted that Ms. Rea served as the first chairwoman of the Anaheim Library Board and remained a member for 4 years. She added that Ms. Rea helped establish the City’s first Parent Teacher Association (PTA) and highlighted her service as a charter member of the Ebell Club of Anaheim. She noted that Ms. Rea along with her sister Ella, inspired the naming of Katella Avenue.

Mark Richard Daniels shared that a petition is circulating for the November General Municipal Election ballot for the City to adopt rent control. He encouraged the City Council to be proactive and adopt an ordinance implementing rent control.

Jocelyn Pacheco addressed the City Council regarding the officer-involved shooting of Albert Arzola and called for greater transparency and accountability from the Anaheim Police Department. She urged the City to release the name of the officer involved, the unedited body camera footage, and the autopsy report. She expressed concern about transparency, public trust, and police accountability.

Leslie Lopez expressed concerns regarding the circumstances of the officer-involved shooting of Albert Arzola. She criticized the response of the Anaheim Police Department. She questioned public statements made on the incident and the justification for the use of force according to Police Department policy.

Grace Arzola expressed concerns about the Police Department’s response to the shooting of Albert Arzola. She criticized the communication with the family and community and the information provided to the neighborhood on the incident. She called for transparency, accountability, and the release of the body camera footage of the incident. She raised concerns regarding accessibility accommodations and compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) at Council meetings.

Sergio Pelayo called for justice and accountability for the death of Albert Arzola. He questioned the use of force used and the response time for medical assistance. He expressed concern that another family member was placed in danger during the incident. He reflected on Albert’s character and the emotional toll that the loss has had on the family.

Cecil Jordan Corkern expressed concerns regarding Disney content and imagery and questioned City involvement with Disney. He shared that he would compile and submit information to the Police Department for review and investigation. He emphasized the importance of protecting children and addressing community safety concerns.

Ruben Greg Soto shared his personal experience with law enforcement and homelessness. He expressed frustration regarding social services and support for vulnerable individuals. He called for greater assistance for people experiencing homelessness and hardships.

Rosie Camacho addressed the City Council regarding the death of her son, Alberto Arzola. She called for greater transparency, an independent investigation, and stronger oversight of the Police Department. She noted that the upcoming election would allow residents to evaluate the City Council’s leadership. She urged the City Council to ensure accountability for the officer-involved shooting and to restore public trust.

Mike Robbins criticized the influence of special interests and campaign contributions in elections. He expressed concern about governance, fiscal priorities, and public accountability in the City. He urged the City Council to prioritize the needs of residents, address public safety and policing concerns, and ensure accountability in decision-making outside of special interests.

City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026

G. Price raised concerns regarding wildfire evacuation planning related to the proposed Festival project. She emphasized the importance of accounting for individuals evacuating from outside the evacuation zone. She stated that the current evacuation study did not account for those individuals and urged the City Council to delay any project approvals until a complete evacuation model is completed and related data is publicly released to ensure safety and transparency.

Andrew Winger expressed support for the Arzola family. He expressed concern regarding the proposed Festival project and its location in a Very-High Fire Hazard Zone. He questioned the project’s evacuation planning, parking impacts, and residential density. He expressed concern over the Know Your Way evacuation plan and evacuation times based on ideal human behaviors during evacuation conditions. He urged the City Council to prioritize public safety, transparency, and alternative locations for the development.

David Pulido demanded justice for the death of Albert Arzola. He called for the release of the unedited body camera footage, autopsy report, and the name of the officer involved in the shooting.

He expressed concerns regarding police accountability and criticized investigative processes involving officer-involved incidents, stating that investigations often result in findings that officers did not violate criminal laws or departmental policies. He called for independent oversight, greater transparency, and representation of the public’s interests.

Art Castillo shared his community involvement in Anaheim since he was a teenager. He expressed concerns regarding community-police relations, racial bias, and retaliation. He encouraged City officials to engage directly with residents in neighborhoods. He requested accountability and collaboration to address community concerns.

Mazatl Tepehyolotzin expressed support for transparency and accountability regarding the death of Albert Arzola. He called for the release of the officer’s identity. He discussed Native American and Chicano cultural representation in Anaheim, including appreciation for community mural projects. He shared his personal experience growing up in neighborhoods and expressed concerns regarding cultural representation. He highlighted the native plant landscaping being installed near the OCVIBE project. He requested increased Native American representation at public sites and community spaces.

John Baca, representative for the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW), addressed the Council regarding ongoing contract negotiations involving IBEW employees. He emphasized the importance of ensuring the Union’s concerns are clearly communicated to the Council and expressed a desire to reach a contract resolution so the City can focus on other community issues.

Sophia Sosa addressed public health concerns regarding Disneyland fireworks. She shared that while the fireworks are an Anaheim staple, she noted long-term threats to residents and the local environment due to perchlorate exposure and aerial shells. She explained that the chemicals settle into the waterways, backyards, and the body during respiration. She cited the National Institute of Health’s report regarding the health impacts of perchlorate exposure. She requested that the Council implement policies that require Disneyland to transition into low-emission alternatives such as drone shows or LED technology.

Brian Olson commented on ongoing labor negotiations for City linemen. He noted the risks associated with maintaining high-voltage power lines and emphasized concerns regarding the expired labor contract. He noted financial uncertainty the employees experience until a new contract is negotiated. He requested improved communication between the negotiating parties for the Council to ensure employee concerns are accurately understood and the urgency to finalize a contract.

City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026

David Aguon addressed the City Council regarding ongoing IBEW labor negotiations. He highlighted the essential role that utility employees have in maintaining electric and water services for the City.

He expressed concerns regarding the length of negotiations, employee retention and recruitment, pension-related issues, and the bargaining process. He requested a timely resolution for contract negotiations and offered to discuss the matter with Council Members further.

Vance Dizney expressed appreciation for the Council Members and acknowledged challenges facing the community. He shared ideas to promote infrastructure improvements and alternative currency concepts.

Bryan Kaye addressed the City Council regarding public safety and interactions with the Police Department. He expressed concerns regarding police conduct and accountability. He referenced ongoing legal matters and urged accountability and improved decision-making.

Marc Herbert stated that the Arzola family was still owed a dedicated community meeting regarding the officer-involved incident and expressed concerns about the format and outreach of prior public meetings. He mentioned future development at Angels Stadium and leadership from the City Council on the sale. He urged the inclusion of affordable housing. He requested greater transparency regarding the public posting of calendars of City executive staff.

Pearl Arzola requested the release of the unedited body camera footage and the identities of the officers involved in the shooting of Albert Arzola. She raised concerns regarding human trafficking activities along Beach Boulevard and urged the City Council to prioritize enforcement and support services for affected youth. She expressed opposition to the proposed Festival project.

Andrew shared his personal experiences with homelessness and interactions with law enforcement and service providers in Anaheim. He expressed concerns regarding the response to calls involving alleged threats, assaults, and requests for police assistance. He requested accountability from the Police Department.

Christine Ediss addressed the City Council regarding the death of her nephew Albert Arzola. She shared that Albert loved the City, attended Anaheim public schools, and contributed to the City. She emphasized that the family’s concerns are focused on accountability rather than opposition to law enforcement. She commented on the family’s previous interactions with police officers. She called for transparency, accountability, and the release of the unedited body camera footage and autopsy report.

Kenneth Batiste expressed concerns regarding accountability, public trust, and community safety. He called for the release of video footage for the officer-involved shooting with Albert Arzola. He shared concerns regarding wildfire risks associated with the proposed Festival development. He advocated for rent control measures and tenant protections in the City due to rising housing costs and displacement concerns.

COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS:

Council Member Kurtz reported that in response to feedback from mobile food truck owners and their businesses on enforcement, City staff, herself, and Council Member Maahs worked to review regulation challenges and the concerns raised. She shared that meetings were held with vendors to look at options for flexibility while addressing current regulations and community needs and concerns.

She explained that the City recognizes the concerns and the services provided by mobile food vendors, but also concerns raised about parking safety and health. She shared that the City must follow the Municipal Code, Orange County Health Care Agency regulations, and State law. She reported that after extensive efforts, staff was unable to find a workable option for the vendors that City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026

would allow them to continue their current operation practices without violating State and County health and safety standards. She stated that the City must return to regular enforcement of the Municipal Code. She shared that the Code Enforcement team would be working with vendors to understand the permitting process and operational requirements. She noted that the goal is to educate before any resumed enforcement. She reported that the City celebrates and welcomes entrepreneurs and small businesses and offers a pathway to vendors. She thanked Council Member Maahs, City staff, and the vendors for their effort and creative thinking. She noted that the vendors would be receiving additional information on how to operate within the constraints of the Municipal Code and the County Health Code. She shared that the public can contact Code Enforcement or her and Council Member Maahs.

Council Member Maahs thanked Anaheim Fire and Rescue for the fire safety and emergency preparedness meeting held on February 12th at the Sunkist branch of the Anaheim Library. She expressed her appreciation for the residents who attended, for Anaheim Fire and Rescue for providing their expertise, the Library for hosting, and her team for sharing information on the meeting.

She shared that participants had the opportunity to learn about disaster preparedness and the importance of a plan. She highlighted the importance of being prepared for a disaster. Council Member Maahs announced that she would be co-hosting, with the Sierra Club, a screening of the movie Join or Die, about civic life and community involvement. She shared that doors open at 5:30 p.m. and several local service clubs would be present to share ways for residents get involved and participate. Council Member Maahs requested to adjourn the meeting in memory of Dick Mosher. She shared that she had the privilege of knowing Mr. Mosher through his service and deep devotion to his family. She added that for 25 years, he read weekly to first-grade students at Betsy Ross Elementary School. She shared that for 37 years, he worked in the aerospace industry, starting as a forklift operator to logistics and contract management. She mentioned that in her last conversation with Mr.

Mosher, he spoke about his family and his wife of 68 years. She shared that he was a proud father, husband, grandfather, great-grandfather, and member of the Kiwanis Club for nearly 50 years. She extended her thoughts to his wife and the entire Mosher family.

Council Member Rubalcava thanked and expressed her appreciation for everyone who participated during public comment, including the Arzola family. She shared that City Council has something for the family, in recognition of the City Council adjourning a previous meeting in memory of Albert Arzola. She mentioned that the Police Chief confirmed the release of the video footage soon, and an independent investigation was ongoing. She thanked IBEW for attending and shared that her father is a longtime member of IBEW. She acknowledged their comments and expressed hope that Human Resources is negotiating in good faith. Council Member Rubalcava highlighted the District 3 community Open House which included Code Enforcement, Public Utilities, the Police Department, Fire and Rescue, and the Housing and Community Development Department. She noted the many resources provided to the unhoused and recognized Deputy Director of Housing and Community Development Sandra Lozeau for her work. She thanked City staff for their work addressing issues and beautification efforts on Lincoln Avenue. She acknowledged the concerns from District 6 residents but acknowledged the need for housing across the City and City staff recommendations.

Council Member Rubalcava highlighted the upcoming mural at Center Greens by Damin Lujan. She recognized the community and the Community Services Department’s efforts on the project. She also recognized Mazatl, for his efforts to promote the inclusion of Native American culture in the mural.

Council Member Rubalcava shared that she visited Price Elementary School as part of a reading initiative nationwide. She announced that it was an honor to read to second and third graders who live in District 3. She shared that she read a water-wise book for the students. Council Member Rubalcava requested to adjourn the meeting in memory of Anaheim Police Department Investigator Jaime Llamas after a long and courageous battle with terminal brain cancer. She shared that he passed away peacefully in his home, surrounded by his family. She highlighted his service to the City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026

community with dedication and professionalism since 2006. She shared that when a member of the Anaheim family passes, it impacts everyone and offered her prayers to his family.

Council Member Balius thanked the Public Works Department, including James from Traffic, for assisting during the recent storm and for a speedy recovery from the damages incurred. He recognized Anaheim Fire and Rescue Truck 6 for the hazmat truck orientation. Council Member Balius acknowledged the human trafficking concerns mentioned during public comments and encouraged individuals to call 911. He shared that new State laws provide flexibility for the Police to address the situation.

Mayor Pro Tem Leon recognized Anaheim Public Utilities and their work installing brighter street lights on Brookhurst. He highlighted the benefits the street lights would have on the community. He thanked Public Works and Union Pacific for coordinating a railroad crossing. He noted that railroad crossings are typically replaced every 40 to 50 years and require extensive coordination. He shared that he was invited to celebrate Lunar New Year with UVSA (Union of Vietnamese Student Associations of Southern California) and Advance Beauty College. He highlighted the vibrant celebrations and pride amongst the community. Mayor Pro Tem Leon thanked the Community Services Department for hosting Youth in Government Day. He shared his participation while he was a student and highlighted the program’s investment in students. He requested to adjourn the meeting in memory of Paul Joseph Schiada, an Anaheim Union High School District music and math teacher for more than 35 years, including many years at Magnolia High School. He highlighted his dedication to students and brought his passions for music and the arts to his work every day. He shared that he is survived by his partner Vince and his siblings.

CITY MANAGER’S UPDATE:

Assistant City Manager Greg Garcia highlighted the completion of the most recent Community Open Houses. He stated he had the opportunity to attend the meetings and noted the high turnout and discussion on various topics including Rebuild Beach, parks, and public safety. Assistant City Manager Garcia shared that staff solicited high-level feedback and thoughts from residents regarding the Angel Stadium site and what they might want to see in the long term on that site. He reported that the stadium assessment is ongoing and he would continue to provide updates as appropriate moving forward.

At 7:03 p.m., Mayor Aitken recessed the Anaheim City Council to address the Anaheim Housing Authority agenda, and reconvened at 7:04 p.m.

CONSENT CALENDAR: The Consent Calendar was considered with Mayor Pro Tem Leon pulling Item Nos. 5 and 13 for separate consideration.

MOTION: Council Member Maahs moved to waive reading of the resolutions and adopt the balance of the consent calendar as presented, in accordance with reports, certifications, and recommendations furnished each City Council Member, seconded by Council Member Meeks. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES – 7 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Leon, Balius, Rubalcava, Kurtz, Maahs, and Meeks); NOES – 0. Motion carried.

3. Receive and file minutes of the Library Board meeting of January 12, 2026, Parks and Recreation Commission meeting of December 3, 2025, and Public Utilities Board meeting of December 17, 2025.

City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026

4. Approve certificates recognizing Janis Heckel on her retirement as Executive Director of the Anaheim Community Foundation; Brent Finlay on his retirement as Chief Executive Officer of the Anaheim YMCA; and Radiant Beer Co. on their 5th Anniversary.

6. Approve Master Agreement (MA) Contract No. 106-498964 with DMS Facility Services LLC, in the amount of $616,440 and $489,900 for the first year, for landscape maintenance services for City parks in the North Central and Central service areas respectively, for a total first year not to exceed amount of $1,106,340, with up to four one-year optional renewals, for a total cumulative not to exceed amount of $5,531,700, plus annual renewal increases subject to Consumer Price Index (CPI), applicable taxes, and a 20% contingency for as-needed services; approve MA Contract No. 106-498965 with Parkwood Landscape Maintenance, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $1,021,548 for the first year, with up to four one-year optional renewals, for a cumulative not-to-exceed amount of $5,107,740, plus annual renewal increases subject to CPI, applicable taxes, and a 20% contingency for as-needed services, for landscape maintenance services for City parks in the East service area; authorize the Purchasing Agent, or designee, to execute all necessary contractual documents and exercise the renewal options in accordance with Invitation for Bids No. 9867A; and increase the Community Services Department Fiscal Year 2025/26 General Fund budget by $250,000 to cover the increase in landscape maintenance costs for the remainder of the fiscal year.

7. Approve Master Agreement Contract No. 106-498990 with Convergint Technologies LLC, in an amount not to exceed $440,038 in the first year and $54,821.30 annually thereafter, plus applicable taxes and fees, for a cumulative total amount not to exceed $714,144.50 and a 20% contingency, for the purchase of Milestone video management systems software and associated services for a term effective through February 18, 2029 with three one-year optional extensions; and authorize the Purchasing Agent to execute all contractual documents, in accordance with Cooperative Sourcewell Master Agreement No. 121024.

8. Approve Master Agreement Contract No. 106-498989 with Veterans Communication Services, Inc., in an annual amount not to exceed $80,241, for a one year period, with four one-year optional renewals, for a total amount not to exceed $401,205, plus applicable sales tax and a 20% contingency, for the removal, replacement and furnishing of security camera equipment and related services on an as-needed basis; and authorize the Purchasing Agent, or designee, to execute all contractual documents and renewal options, in accordance with Bid No. 9870.

9. Award a construction contract to the lowest responsible bidder, Asplundh Construction, LLC, in the amount of $2,102,980.50, plus a 10% contingency, for Electric Utility Relocation Project at Cerritos Avenue and Douglass Road; authorize the Director of Public Works, or designees, to execute the contract and any related documents, including any cost-neutral amendments of the contract and any contemplated by the contract, and to take such actions as are necessary, required, or advisable to implement and administer the contract; determine that the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Sections 15301(b), 15302(c) and (d), and 15303 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; and authorize the Finance Director to execute the Escrow Agreement pertaining to contract retentions in accordance with Public Contract Code Section 22300.

City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026

10. Approve the Close-Out Change Order with All American Asphalt, Inc., in the amount of $31,530.88, which includes settlement of any outstanding claims and extra work orders for the Serrano Avenue Rehabilitation from the West City Limit to Weir Canyon Road Project; and authorize the Director of Public Works to execute the Change Order and to take such actions as are necessary or required to implement and administer the Change Order.

11. Approve the Second Amendment to Agreement with Carpi & Clay Inc., increasing the term by two additional one-year optional renewals, increasing the monthly compensation from $5,000 to $5,500, and increasing the total not to exceed amount by $132,000 from $315,000 to $447,000, for federal advocacy services; and authorize the City Manager, or designee, to administer the agreement under the terms and conditions of the agreement.

12. Waive Council Policy 4.1 and approve a SaaS Subscription and Services Agreement with Benevate, LLC, dba Neighborly Software, in an amount not to exceed $250,000, for grant management software for a term commencing February 14, 2026 and ending January 31, 2031; and designate the Director of Housing and Community Development, or designee, to as the certifying official authorized to execute the agreement and all documents related to the administration, management, and implementation of the agreement.

14. RESOLUTION NO. 2026-005 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM vacating a portion of a Public Service Easement located at 7581 East Country Hill Lane pursuant to California Streets and Highways Code Section 8330, et seq. – Summary Vacation (ABA2025-00442).

Authorize the City Clerk to hold the recordation of the Resolution in the Orange County Recorder’s office until directed by the Public Works Director or designee.

15. RESOLUTION NO. 2026-006 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM adopting a Memorandum of Understanding establishing terms and conditions of employment including modification of pay policies, creating, deleting, and/or modifying certain classifications for employees in classifications represented by the Anaheim Municipal Employees Association, General Employees and superseding Resolution Nos. 2022-136 and 2025-006.

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-007 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM adopting a Memorandum of Understanding establishing terms and conditions of employment including modification of pay policies, creating, deleting, and/or modifying certain classifications for employees in classifications represented by the Anaheim Municipal Employees Association, Clerical Employees and superseding Resolution Nos. 2022-137, 2025-007 and 2025-077.

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-008 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM adopting a Memorandum of Understanding establishing terms and conditions of employment including modification of pay policies for employees in classifications represented by the Anaheim Municipal Employees Association, Part-Time Unit and superseding Resolution Nos. 2022-138, 2023-067, 2025-008, and 2025-078.

City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026

Amend the Fiscal Year 2025/2026 budget by $9,579,846.

16. Approve minutes of the City Council meeting of December 9, 2025.

BUSINESS CALENDAR:

5. Receive and file, with the possibility of discussion, the list of Professional Services Agreements authorized by the City Manager and the list of Visit Anaheim Subcontractor Agreements approved by the Executive Director of Convention, Sports, and Entertainment for January 2026.

DISCUSSION: Mayor Pro Tem Leon requested clarification regarding the Tourism Economics agreement and whether the agreement included multiple agreements and the evaluation process for aggregate contract thresholds. He also requested clarification on the City’s contract approval process for Council review and approval.

Executive Director of Convention, Sports and Entertainment Tom Morton clarified that any subcontract exceeding $150,000, whether individually or in an aggregate amount, is subject to review and approval by the City.

Christina Dawson with Visit Anaheim explained that the Tourism Economics contract includes multiple agreements affiliated with Tourism Economics. She stated that although the Tourism Economics agreement was for $92,500, the combined value of the related agreements exceeded the $150,000 aggregate, which triggered the additional approval. She explained that the related agreements were disclosed to ensure transparency regarding the total contract amounts and associated services.

In response to Mayor Pro Tem Leon, Ms. Dawson clarified that the agreement are affiliated with the same company; however, each contract includes a distinct scope of work. She noted that each individual agreement and scope of work is available and could be provided for City Council review.

She confirmed each agreement includes a different set of deliverables.

MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Leon moved to receive and file, with the possibility of discussion, the list of Professional Services Agreements authorized by the City Manager and the list of Visit Anaheim Subcontractor Agreements approved by the Executive Director of Convention, Sports, and Entertainment for January 2026, seconded by Council Member Kurtz. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES - 7 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Leon, Balius, Rubalcava, Kurtz, Maahs, and Meeks); NOES – 0.

Motion carried.

13. Approve an agreement with Eagle Systems International, Inc., dba Synergy Companies, at an annual cost not to exceed $1,395,220 (initial-term aggregate equals $6,970,000), plus a 10% contingency for as-needed extra services, for energy and water efficiency residential programs and direct installation services for an initial five year and up to two one-year optional extensions; and authorize the Public Utilities General Manager, or designees, to execute the agreement and all related or implementing documents, including any cost-neutral City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026

amendments, assignments, and documents contemplated by the agreement, and to take actions necessary to implement and administer the agreement.

Public Utilities General Manager Dukku Lee reported that the agreements would continue two home efficiency services that have been well-received by customers. He shared that the Home Utility Check-Up Program provides a no-cost, in-home assessment that includes a detailed bill analysis and recommendations on ways to improve specific household electricity and water usage. He reported that the Dusk-to-Dawn Lighting Program provides single-family and multi-family electric customers with high-efficiency exterior security light fixtures, which aims to improve neighborhood safety and energy efficiency. He stated that in July 2025, a Request for Proposals (RFP) was issued, resulting in two submissions that were evaluated based on Council Policy 4.1. He reported that the highest- ranking firm was not recommended for approval due to their pricing proposal, which was 30% higher than that of the second-ranked firm.

General Manager Lee stated that Synergy Companies’ proposal met the scope of work and offered the lowest-cost proposal. He noted that the company has performed similar work with other utilities, including Southern California Edison, San Diego Gas & Electric, Riverside Public Utilities, and Colton Electric Utility. He added that the proposed agreement term is five years with two optional one-year extensions with payments based on actual participation levels. He noted that the funding is not from the General Fund. He reported that electric utilities are required by State legislation to allocate funds from electric rates for energy efficiency and low-income programs established during energy deregulation in the late 1990’s. He added that water measures are separately funded from the water utility and would help meet Statewide drought mitigation regulations.

DISCUSSION: In response to Mayor Pro Tem Leon, General Manager Lee confirmed Synergy Companies was the City’s current vendor. He reported that the current agreement term concluded, which required an RFP. He shared that residents can call the Public Utilities Department or 3-1-1 or use Anaheim Anytime for any questions.

MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Leon moved to approve an agreement with Eagle Systems International, Inc., dba Synergy Companies, at an annual cost not to exceed $1,395,220 (initial-term aggregate equals $6,970,000), plus a 10% contingency for as-needed extra services, for energy and water efficiency residential programs and direct installation services for an initial five year and up to two one-year optional extensions; and authorize the Public Utilities General Manager, or designees, to execute the agreement and all related or implementing documents, including any cost-neutral amendments, assignments, and documents contemplated by the agreement, and to take actions necessary to implement and administer the agreement, seconded by Council Member Balius. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES - 7 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Leon, Balius, Rubalcava, Kurtz, Maahs, and Meeks); NOES – 0. Motion carried.

17. Receive a presentation regarding program updates and funding needs of the Contigo program offered by the Community Services Department and provide direction to staff as needed.

Director of Community Services Sjany Larson-Cash reported that at the February 3rd Council meeting, Council Member Kurtz requested an update on the Contigo program, and Mayor Pro Tem Leon requested that staff explore options to expand funding. She stated that funding for the program, in the amount of $250,000, was approved in July 2025 to assist Anaheim residents affected by immigration enforcement activities with emergency grant funding for rent, utilities, or miscellaneous expenses.

City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026

Chief Communications Officer Mike Lyster recognized Communications Specialist Natalie Aguirre for her role with the Contigo Program. He reported that Anaheim Contigo launched June 17, 2025, in response to the challenge and disruption due to federal immigration enforcement. He stated that it consists of three key areas, including timely updates on enforcement activity or suspicion of activity, legal referrals, and emergency assistance grants. He shared that since June, the Communications team has responded to over 100 incidents or potential incidents to detail the circumstances or dispel speculation or inaccurate information. He displayed an image of the City’s website with current updates. He noted the importance of the updates and accuracy of the information. He shared that following enforcement events in Minneapolis, there has been targeted enforcement activity. He added that there have not been any confirmed activities in the City over the past two weeks and no roving enforcement since late January. He noted that the activity can change at any time. He urged the public to seek reliable information on the City’s website and other trusted sources.

Chief Communications Officer reported that extensive information and resources on the City’s website. He stated that the information includes what to do in the first 24 hours if someone is detained, the Contigo leaflet, information for workplaces, how to avoid legal scams, and an overview of how federal immigration enforcement works and how to distinguish it from the Police Department and other local law enforcement. He shared that the website also includes an overview of Anaheim Police operations. He added that links to the Mexican consulate, Representative Lou Correa’s office, Orange County Rapid Response, and other agencies are included on the website, as well as a list of nonprofit legal referrals available for the community.

Neighborhood Services Manager Joe Perez reported any Anaheim resident in need of assistance can contact the City at any of the three Family Resource Centers located throughout the City. He shared that the bilingual case managers continue to meet with clients in person, over the phone, and virtually to conduct client intake and assessments that determine program eligibility. He reported that qualifications to participate include residency in the City, low-income household designation, and the ability to demonstrate an immediate emergency need due to immigration enforcement. He added that eligible clients qualify for up to $1,000 for rent or up to $500 for all other household expenses.

Neighborhood Services Manager Perez reported that the City Council authorized $250,000 in grant funds to provide economic relief to residents impacted by immigration enforcement in the community.

He shared that the City has assisted 331 Anaheim families through the programs, in partnership with the Anaheim Community Foundation. He stated that approximately $213,000 in emergency grant funds have been distributed to creditors to help pay for rent, utilities, and other miscellaneous expenses. He reported that the remaining $36,000 will be expended in two to three months based on current service level demand. He shared that no case is typical, with rental assistance being the highest priority and largest monthly expense for clients. He noted that funds for rental assistance have come from the Housing Trust Fund and all other expenses from the City’s General Fund. He reported that all other family needs identified outside of the Contigo fund are referred to community, faith, education, and nonprofit agencies to address gaps in support that are needed to help stabilize home environments. He shared that based on client eligibility, case managers match the needs to available resources that include access to food, medical, health support, information and referrals for other support services.

Neighborhood Services Manager Perez relayed a message of gratitude from clients for the support; however, he noted challenges with funding limitations. He shared that the financial support concerns stem from the high cost of rent, utilities, and other household expenses. He stated that case managers noted rents owed range from $1,900 to $3,100 monthly. He reported that short-term assistance provides up to 30 days of temporary relief for each case, only allowing a slight pause and regrouping for families. He added that the current model does not allow for assistance with legal expenses. He shared that the Contigo program provides much-needed assistance and temporary City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026

relief to families to address present and ever-changing needs.

Chief Communications Officer Lyster shared that legal assistance was contemplated when Contigo was formed. He stated that the City approached the Anaheim Community Foundation, which welcomed the opportunity to provide the assistance; however, they noted that they did not have prior experience providing legal assistance. He reported that the City approached the Public Law Center and Orange County Justice Fund as referral partners. He added that since the program’s inception, the Mexican Consulate in Santa Ana and UCI Law are other trusted referral options. He stated that CHIRLA has created a legal concentration consultation service, once a week by appointment.

DISCUSSION: Council Member Kurtz thanked City staff and resource center teams for their work supporting the community, particularly during the early stages of emergency response efforts. She acknowledged the dedication, communication, and patience demonstrated by staff in assisting residents during a challenging period. She thanked Ms. Aguirre and Neighborhood Services Manager Perez for their dedication to the program and responding to the community’s concerns and needs.

She inquired about the service level demands for the program.

Neighborhood Services Manager Perez stated that community service requests and calls for assistance fluctuate based on activity and enforcement efforts occurring within the community. He noted that there is no typical pattern for service demand but emphasized that staff remain available to respond to calls and provide assistance as needed.

In response to Council Member Kurtz, Director Larson-Cash explained that City Council previously approved and allocated $250,000. She stated that rental-related assistance were funded through the Housing Trust Fund, while miscellaneous expenses associated with the program were funded through the General Fund.

Assistant City Manager Garcia added that Council’s direction allowed staff the ability to use both funds, based on requests, and evaluate which fund to use. He explained that an amount was not determined from either fund.

Council Member Kurtz requested clarification on the emergency assistance funding set aside when the Housing Trust Fund was established.

Assistant City Manager Garcia stated that $1 million was set aside for emergency assistance.

Council Member Kurtz stated that $1,000 in rental assistance based on average rental amounts may not be enough support.

Council Member Rubalcava thanked Chief Communications Officer Lyster for responding to enforcement activity and efforts to respond. She inquired how assistance is determined, whether requests for assistance were declining based on activity, and how staff verify that assistance is being provided to individuals impacted by activity.

Neighborhood Services Manager Perez explained that assistance requests are reviewed through a vetting process conducted by case managers, beginning with a client intake and profile. He shared that eligibility requirements include verification of Anaheim residency, income verification using the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) guidelines to confirm low- to moderate- income status, and a self-attestation describing how the individual has been directly impacted by enforcement activity.

In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Neighborhood Services Manager Perez stated that some City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026

individuals inquire about available assistance funds but do not qualify under the program requirements. He reported that if possible, staff have provided support through other emergency assistance funds administered through the Anaheim Community Foundation, including assistance programs established prior to Contigo and emergency assistance funds designated for older adults ages 55 and older.

Council Member Rubalcava expressed appreciation for staff’s efforts in exploring a legal defense fund and noted ongoing coordination with legal organizations and nonprofits serving impacted residents. She referenced concerns regarding expedited deportation processes and reduced due process protections, which may increase family separations, and asked whether staff are seeing requests for legal defense assistance or primarily requests related to housing and day-to-day support services.

Neighborhood Services Manager Perez stated that some clients have requested assistance with legal fees related to immigration matters, but the program is limited in the assistance it can provide and generally refers individuals to partner agencies and legal service organizations. He noted that clients have shared that legal fees are estimated between $20,000 and $35,000 and acknowledged a growing need for legal support services.

In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Chief Communications Officer Lyster reported that the City have received general requests to consider a legal defense fund but not specific requests from nonprofits.

Council Member Balius requested clarification regarding Council’s direction on the funding source for the assistance.

Director Larson-Cash clarified that several options were considered for funding. She reported that Council directed staff to evaluate the most appropriate funding sources with the least operational disruption, as it was not yet clear how much could be allocated from the Housing Trust Fund versus the General Fund. She noted that subsequent updates and memos have been provided to Council regarding the number of individuals served, funding sources, and services being provided.

In response to Council Member Balius, Assistant City Manager Garcia explained that Council direction was to evaluate both funding sources and find ways to use funds from the Housing Trust Fund as much as possible and the General Fund when needed.

Mayor Pro Tem Leon commended staff and community partners for establishing the Anaheim Contigo program and supporting residents during federal immigration enforcement activity, noting that the City acted in alignment with its values by providing outreach, communication, and assistance during a period of fear and uncertainty in the community. He thanked staff, particularly the Communications team, and partners for helping residents feel informed and supported and asked about the remaining program balance, clarification on the reported funding amounts, and the process for bringing a request to replenish program funds back to the council for consideration.

Assistant City Manager Garcia stated that approximately $36,000 remains in the program fund balance, which is anticipated to support the program for at least the next couple of months, depending on the volume of requests received. He noted that Council could consider replenishing the funds from both the General Fund and the Housing Trust Fund and could provide additional direction regarding the desired allocation amounts from each funding source moving forward.

City Attorney Fabela recommended that a request for additional funding be agendized for further discussion, in compliance with the Brown Act.

City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026

Mayor Pro Tem Leon expressed support for bringing back a discussion on replenishing program funds and cautioned against interpreting the recent decline in enforcement activity as an indication that community needs have ended, noting that enforcement activity tends to occur in cycles and could increase again at any time. He emphasized the importance of maintaining available assistance funds proactively to avoid leaving families without support during future enforcement surges. He also expressed interest in exploring a legal defense component within the Contigo program and asked whether staff have recently engaged with legal service organizations regarding their current capacity, the timeliness of legal assistance being provided to referred residents, and whether individuals are being placed on waitlists for services.

Assistant City Manager Garcia reported that staff have reached out to ten nonprofit organizations that provide immigration defense and other cities with similar programs. He explained that legal defense services generally fall into three categories: legal consultation and guidance, immediate petitions related to detainment, and longer-term legal representation. He indicated that additional time would be needed to further evaluate options, gather proposals from organizations, and determine whether to pursue a formal request for proposals process.

Chief Communications Officer Lyster noted that the current level of immigration enforcement activity is unprecedented compared to prior periods and stated that nonprofit legal service providers are experiencing significantly increased demand for assistance, resulting in capacity constraints and limited availability of services.

Mayor Pro Tem Leon requested that staff return with proposals outlining potential legal defense fund options for the Anaheim Contigo program, including possible partnerships with nonprofit organizations already providing immigration legal services in Orange County and examples of programs implemented by other cities. He also expressed interest in reviewing options for replenishing Contigo program funding, noting that recent declines in enforcement activity may only be temporary and that the city should remain prepared to respond to future community needs.

Council Member Kurtz expressed support for Mayor Pro Tem Leon’s request. She noted that residents often need quick information about available resources and procedures after a family member or neighbor is detained. She also raised concerns about individuals being taken advantage of by private attorneys charging excessive legal fees and stated that partnerships with nonprofit organizations could help connect residents with trusted information and referrals for additional legal support if needed.

Council Member Maahs thanked staff for their work supporting the Anaheim Contigo program, specifically recognizing Ms. Aguirre’s and Chief Communications Officer Lyster’s efforts to assist residents directly and provide timely and accurate information to the community. She asked staff what the average amount of financial assistance being provided per family was through the program.

Neighborhood Services Manager Perez reported that the assistance is $1,000 for rent and up to $500 for other expenses for each family.

In response to Council Member Maahs, Neighborhood Services Manager Perez confirmed that families are utilizing the full assistance amounts.

In response to Council Member Maahs, Director Larson-Cash stated that the Anaheim Community Foundation would welcome and accept private donations to support the Anaheim Contigo program and noted that some outside donations had already been received at the start of the program. She added that any continued donations would be set aside specifically for program assistance efforts.

City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026

Council Member Maahs expressed concern with full representation and potential limits it may impose to serve fewer individuals. She expressed interest in exploring available options.

Council Member Rubalcava expressed concern regarding the funding source used for the Anaheim Contigo program, stating that the Council’s prior direction was for the initial funding to come from DisneylandForward funds rather than the General Fund, and requested staff review the prior Council direction. She also expressed interest in identifying additional funding sources specifically to support families impacted by immigration detainment, including potential partnerships with other elected officials, local agencies, businesses, hotels, and private donors. She praised staff efforts related to community outreach, including Know Your Rights materials, family resource center services, and public safety outreach, and acknowledged partnerships with local, county, and federal officials supporting immigrant communities. She highlighted Congressman Lou Correa’s efforts in partnering with the City and advocating for better support for individuals and funding.

Mayor Aitken thanked staff for preparing the Anaheim Contigo program update and noted that the discussion was timely as the City approaches budget season and considers potential future funding allocations. She expressed interest in exploring additional legal clinic partnerships with organizations such as the Public Law Center and the Orange County Bar Association to expand community legal assistance opportunities. She also requested that staff circulate information to the Council regarding the original intended funding sources and the actual funding allocations used for the program, emphasizing the importance of maintaining clarity and alignment with prior council direction.

Assistant City Manager Garcia thanked City staff for their continued work supporting the Anaheim Contigo program and assisting residents through the Family Resource Centers. He recognized the Communications team for providing around-the-clock community outreach and information and commended staff for quickly mobilizing resources and continuing to evolve the program to meet community needs.

In response to Mayor Pro Tem Leon, City Attorney Fabela advised that further direction be given during the Council agenda setting.

Informational item; no formal action taken by Council.

18. Discuss and provide direction to the Human Resources Director on the recruitment process for the position of the City Manager for the City of Anaheim.

Director of Human Resources Linda Andal reported that staff has been asked to move forward with a nationwide recruitment for the vacant City Manager position and return with options to consider the structure of the process as outlined in the City Charter. She stated that the City Manager serves as the City’s Chief Administrative Officer and is appointed and serves at the City Council’s discretion.

She highlighted the importance of the recruitment process reflecting the Council’s priorities and consider professional best practices. She stated that the recruitment process should balance transparency, equity, deliberation, and candidate confidentiality.

Director Andal reported that a typical executive recruitment takes three to five months from initiation to appointment, depending on outreach strategy, interview scheduling, background processes, and contract negotiations. She stated that staff recommends retaining a professional executive recruitment firm, which is standard practice for City Manager recruitments and supports broad outreach objective screening, and confidential engagement with highly qualified candidates. She shared that Council direction is requested on proceeding with the firm and preferred selection City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026

method.

Director Andal reported that transparency in the process could be achieved through clear communication of the recruitment timeline, process milestones, and opportunities for input. She stated that confidentiality is critical to attracting experienced sitting executives and preserving a strong candidate pool. She noted that staff would structure the process to balance transparency and confidentiality consistent with Council direction. She shared that Council input on leadership qualities, executive experience, management, philosophy, and community expectations would help shape the recruitment brochure and outreach strategy. She explained that it would ensure the process is guided by the Council’s collective vision. She added that staff would facilitate meetings with the executive recruiter and Council to ensure all priorities are required.

Director Andal reported that structured input opportunities could help inform the candidate profile and reinforce public confidence in the process. She explained that could be achieved through confidential surveys or small group sessions. She stated that staff seek Council direction on the level and format of stakeholder or community input. She reported that Council may choose a streamlined process with interviews conducted solely by the Council, consistent with previous City Manager recruitments. She shared that if advisory panels are preferred, staff could incorporate panels to provide structured feedback. She reported that staff would request Council direction to establish the panel’s role as advisory and any additional Council direction.

Director Andal concluded that staff seeks direction on the nationwide recruitment, use of an executive recruiter, timeline, candidate profile, priorities, and stakeholder involvement to allow Human Resources to move forward in alignment with the Council’s expectations and best practices.

DISCUSSION: In response to Mayor Aitken, Director Andal explained that a Request for Proposal (RFP) process for selecting an executive recruitment firm would be more time intensive, requiring development of a scope of work, a formal bidding process, review of proposals, and interviews with responding firms, with the process typically taking approximately 90 days. She noted that a Request for Information (RFI) process is generally faster and commonly used for executive recruitments, involving outreach to firms previously used by the City as well as firms that have expressed interest and shared their qualifications and experience. She added that an RFP process is more formal in nature.

Mayor Aitken requested effective ways to involve the community in the process while maintaining confidentiality for the candidates.

Director Andal recommended gathering community and business stakeholder input early in the recruitment process to help identify community priorities while maintaining candidate confidentiality.

She noted that this approach had been used successfully in prior executive recruitments, including the recent police chief recruitment, and explained that the feedback would help shape the recruitment brochure and align the process with both community needs and Council priorities before the brochure is released.

In response to Mayor Aitken, Director Andal reported the previous City Manager recruitment was held in 2017 for an appointment in 2018.

Mayor Aitken requested information on whether the process included community stakeholder panels.

Director Andal stated that the panel consisted of the City Council.

Mayor Aitken emphasized the importance of conducting a thorough and deliberate recruitment City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026

process for the City Manager position, stating that selecting the right candidate is more important than completing the process quickly. She expressed support for either an RFP or RFI process, provided the City casts a wide net and works with executive recruitment firms that have strong reputations for attracting qualified candidates and proactively recruiting talent. She also suggested consulting similar cities and professional networks for recommendations on experienced executive search firms. She expressed interest in including community involvement while maintaining candidate confidentiality. She suggested including staff and department heads in the process.

Council Member Kurtz echoed Mayor Aitken’s comments on not rushing the process. She stated that community involvement in the City Manager recruitment process should include residents, businesses, department heads, and labor unions due to their close working relationship with the City Manager’s Office. She expressed a preference for an RFI process over an RFP, noting concern that an RFP could prioritize selecting the lowest-cost firm rather than the most experienced and reputable executive recruitment firm. She emphasized the importance of hiring a well-respected firm capable of attracting strong candidates and stated that while the City Council would make the final appointment decision, input from multiple stakeholder groups would be valuable throughout the process.

In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Director Andal described the Police Chief recruitment process as beginning with an RFI process to select an executive recruitment firm specializing in police chief recruitments. She explained that after the firm was retained, the recruiter met individually with City Council Members, affected police department labor groups, department personnel, and department heads who regularly work with the Police Department. She added that staff also conducted several community meetings and attended all City Council district meetings to gather public input. She stated that the feedback collected through those efforts was then used to help shape the recruitment profile and process, which staff described as thorough and comprehensive.

She reported that the process took 90 days from beginning to end.

Council Member Rubalcava expressed support for using an RFI process for the City Manager recruitment due to the flexibility it provides and concerns that traditional bidding processes do not always result in selecting the best-qualified consultant. She also supported conducting a national search and praised the Police Chief recruitment process as thorough and professionally managed.

She stated that community involvement should focus primarily on key stakeholders and organizational leadership rather than broad public vetting of candidates, noting that the City Manager’s primary role is to lead the City organization and work closely with employees and the City Council. She suggested that select community leaders with strong knowledge of City operations could provide valuable input. She supported a comprehensive and deliberate recruitment process, opportunities for Council to provide input on the candidate profile, and involvement from department heads and labor unions in the process because of the close relationship with the City Manager. She also emphasized the importance of maintaining confidentiality and protecting the process from outside influence while ensuring the Council retains responsibility for selecting the next City Manager.

Council Member Meeks expressed support for following a recruitment process similar to the recent Police Chief search, where interviews and outreach with labor unions, community members, stakeholders, and Council Members occurred prior to development of the recruitment brochure to help shape the candidate profile and attract the strongest applicants. She expressed support for using an RFI process, emphasizing that the qualifications and experience of the individual recruiter assigned to the project are more important than the name of the firm itself. She also supported the use of an executive advisory panel to assist Council in the selection process, while maintaining the City Council as the final decision-making authority. She stressed the importance of protecting the integrity and confidentiality of the process by limiting unofficial communications between candidates and Council Members outside the formal recruitment process. She encouraged staff to move forward with community meetings and issuance of the RFI while prioritizing quality throughout the recruitment City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026

effort.

Director Andal requested clarification from the Council regarding the selection process for the executive search firm, specifically whether the Council wished to participate directly in selecting the firm through interviews and review of candidates, receive a shortlist of top firms from Human Resources, or delegate the selection authority entirely to Human Resources.

Mayor Aitken expressed interest in being informed about the executive search firm selected for the recruitment process, including the firm’s experience working with California cities of similar size and scope. She also emphasized the importance of identifying the specific recruiter who would be assigned to conduct outreach and represent the city throughout the recruitment process.

Director Andal confirmed that information regarding the executive search firms and their experience would be provided to the Council, noting that preliminary outreach and research on executive recruiters had already been conducted and that several firms demonstrated extensive experience with city manager recruitments.

Council Member Meeks stated she was comfortable relying on the Human Resources Director’s recommendation regarding selection of the executive search firm.

In response to Mayor Aitken, City Attorney Fabela reported the item would not be eligible to be agendized under Closed Session.

Council Member Rubalcava expressed support for deferring to Human Resources on the executive search firm selection process and stated confidence in staff’s judgment. She suggested that staff provide the council with a list of firms that submitted RFIs along with the recommended firm and evaluation criteria when bringing forward a recommendation for council approval.

Director Andal confirmed that would be the process moving forward.

Council Member Kurtz expressed support.

Mayor Pro Tem Leon support providing the information to Council and the importance of Council selecting the recruiting firm.

Council Member Balius stated support for the RFI process and indicated comfort with staff presenting one or two recommended executive search firms for Council consideration. He emphasized the importance of prioritizing a quality recruitment process over speed and asked for clarification regarding stakeholder involvement, specifically whether the selected recruiter would identify and engage stakeholders to help shape the candidate profile and recruitment brochure before the position is advertised.

Director Andal stated that, if directed by the Council, Human Resources could coordinate with the Assistant City Manager to identify and engage key stakeholders, including major business stakeholders, as part of the recruitment outreach and candidate profile development process.

Council Member Balius expressed support for stakeholder input during the early stages of the recruitment process but raised concerns about stakeholder involvement during candidate interviews and final selection. He stated a preference for limiting participation at the interview stage, potentially allowing only minimal advisory involvement, such as a representative from the department heads, while maintaining the Council’s primary role in the selection process.

City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026

Director Andal explained that the only interview panel for the City Manager, in the past, has been the City Council.

Council Member Balius emphasized the importance of receiving stakeholder and community input during the recruitment process while noting that the City Council, as the elected body, retains the responsibility and authority to make the final decision regarding the City Manager appointment.

Mayor Aitken echoed Council Member Balius’ comments and agreed with incorporating community input early in the recruitment process and suggested utilizing City commissioners and other engaged community stakeholders to help provide feedback on the candidate profile and recruitment materials.

She also noted the importance of allowing flexibility for the selected executive recruiter to recommend additional strategies or approaches based on their prior experience and best practices.

In response to Mayor Pro Tem Leon, Director Andal explained that using an RFI process instead of an RFP would reduce the recruitment timeline by approximately two months. She noted that under the RFI process, the City would solicit responses from executive search firms outlining their proposed costs, scope of work, and experience conducting city manager recruitments. She clarified the RFI process would reduce the process by two months, compared to the formal RFP process.

Mayor Pro Tem Leon acknowledged that the RFI process would shorten the recruitment timeline compared to an RFP and expressed support for the City Council selecting the final executive recruitment firm. He requested that firms’ experience recruiting city managers for similarly sized cities, particularly cities undergoing transition or rebuilding public trust, be considered during evaluation. He supported stakeholder involvement in the process, suggesting that community and business stakeholders provide input through meetings with the recruiter rather than direct participation in candidate interviews. He suggested including community surveys or other low-cost public feedback opportunities to help shape the candidate profile. He also requested regular public progress updates at key milestones in the recruitment process, including selection of the recruitment firm, completion of the candidate profile, and advancement of the applicant pool, while maintaining appropriate confidentiality. He concluded by expressing confidence in the City’s current leadership and staff to maintain organizational stability during the recruitment process.

Director Andal stated that community surveys could be incorporated into the recruitment process, similar to the Police Chief recruitment, where QR-code-based surveys were administered by both the City’s Public Information team and the executive recruiter. She noted that survey responses helped shape the recruitment brochure and informed interview questions during the selection process. She inquired whether Council preferred public meeting updates or regular informational memos to provide progress reports at key recruitment milestones.

Mayor Pro Tem Leon confirmed both processes for updates on the recruitment process.

In response to Council Member Maahs, Director Andal explained that if staff conducted an RFP, many of the executive firms that would respond to the RFP would be contacted through the RFI.

Council Member Maahs expressed support for proceeding with an RFI process and supported incorporating community engagement opportunities through online surveys or a dedicated website.

She also agreed that stakeholders should provide input during the recruitment process rather than serve in an advisory role for candidate selection.

Council Member Rubalcava noted that additional clarification may be needed regarding stakeholder involvement in the recruitment process, as outlined in the staff memo. She explained that Council discussion generally supported involvement from labor groups, employees, and Council, while City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026

emphasizing that the City Council would continue to lead the process. She suggested that further discussion or future agenda consideration may be helpful to provide clearer direction on stakeholder participation, while recognizing that selecting the executive search firm remained the immediate priority.

Director Andal explained that stakeholder identification would be important later, with the executive recruiter conducting individual conversations, otherwise the discussion would be agendized for a public meeting.

Council Member Rubalcava requested additional discussion regarding stakeholder involvement to ensure Council provides clear direction moving forward. She also raised questions regarding the structure of communication and oversight during the recruitment process, including identifying the appropriate point of contact for Council Members to ensure the process remains impartial and consistent with reporting protocols. She noted the importance of maintaining the integrity of the process, avoiding inappropriate influence, and ensuring staff direction occurs through the proper channels.

Director Andal explained that, consistent with past practice, authority over the recruitment process would be delegated to the Human Resources Director to maintain the integrity and confidentiality of the process. She reported that the Human Resources Director would communicate directly with Council Members, and the executive recruiter would also be available to Council throughout the recruitment. She noted that if any inappropriate communications between candidates and Council Members were identified, the executive recruiter would address the issue directly with the candidate and remind them not to engage in those communications outside the formal process.

Council Member Meeks expressed support for modeling the City Manager recruitment process after the recent Police Chief recruitment, noting that the process provided meaningful opportunities for input from labor groups, community members, and stakeholders through multiple in-person and virtual meetings with the recruiter. She stated that the process was efficient, took approximately a week and a half, and effectively gathered broad community feedback while keeping the recruitment moving forward.

In response to Mayor Pro Tem Leon, Director Andal confirmed that the recruitment process would remain flexible and evolve in consultation with the selected executive recruiter. She noted that the recruiter would likely provide best practices, creative recruitment strategies, and insights based on prior executive recruitment experience to help attract the strongest candidates for the city manager position.

In response to Mayor Pro Tem Leon, Director Andal stated that there appeared to be general Council consensus supporting stakeholder involvement, including business and community stakeholders, in the recruitment process. She proposed working with the Interim City Manager to identify stakeholder groups and coordinate outreach with Councilmembers and the selected executive recruiter. She indicated that sufficient direction had been provided to begin discussions with executive recruitment firms and asked Council for confirmation to proceed.

In response to Mayor Aitken, City Attorney Fabela confirmed a motion was not required for the item, unless otherwise stated. He explained the discussion is for the benefit of the Human Resources Director to take the input provided by Council and move forward.

In response to Council Member Balius, Director Andal stated that the current maximum salary for the City Manager position is approximately $404,000 and noted that, while competitive, the compensation may not fully reflect the complexity and scale of the city. She emphasized the importance of offering City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026

competitive compensation to attract highly qualified candidates given the City’s size, operational complexity, labor relations, and stakeholder environment. She also noted that the ongoing Classification and Compensation Study conducted by Segel was nearing completion and that the first phase of the implementation plan, including a potential update to the City Manager salary range, was expected to be presented to Council at the March 24th meeting.

Council Member Balius emphasized the importance of offering competitive compensation in order to attract highly experienced and qualified candidates for the City Manager position and noted that salary considerations should be evaluated alongside the recruitment process.

Mayor Aitken noted that the selected executive recruiter should provide comparative salary data from similarly situated cities nationwide prior to posting the position, in order to help Council evaluate whether the current compensation range for the City Manager position is appropriate or should be adjusted.

Director Andal confirmed the recruiter would have information on compensation but would not conduct a salary study. She noted that Human Resources Department staff can conduct a study internally.

Information item; no formal action taken by Council.

19. RESOLUTION NO. 2026-009 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM for exception to the 180-day wait period in compliance with Government Codes 7522.56 and 21224 of the California Government Code (appointment of Dawn Hernandez, Senior Police Dispatcher, as a retired annuitant).

Director Andal reported that the resolution for consideration is to waive the 180-day waiting period under the California Public Employees Pension Reform Act (PEPRA) and approve the appointment of Dawn Hernandez as a retired annuitant in the position of Senior Police Dispatcher. She stated that under PEPRA, a retired employee may return to work for up to 960 hours in a fiscal year, without impacting their retirement benefit, provided certain conditions are met and Council determines those findings. She explained the findings include certification that the appointment is to fill a critically needed position, the compensation remains within the approved salary range, and that no additional benefits are provided, no service credit is accrued, and that the appointment is approved by the governing body in a public meeting. She reported that Ms. Hernandez retired in December 2025 after 29 years of service as a Senior Police Dispatcher. She stated that dispatchers serve as the first point of contact in emergency situations and their quick ability to gather accurate information and deploy first responders is critical to public safety. She explained that there is an immediate need for an experienced dispatcher who can support dispatch operations and assist in training and mentoring new hires to maintain continuity of operations. She reported that approval of the resolution would authorize the appointment of Ms. Hernandez as a retired annuitant at the hourly rate of $52.11 for a period not to exceed 960 hours in the fiscal year, with no additional benefits and service credit.

MOTION: Council Member Kurtz moved to approve RESOLUTION NO. 2026-009 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM for exception to the 180-day wait period in compliance with Government Codes 7522.56 and 21224 of the California Government Code (appointment of Dawn Hernandez, Senior Police Dispatcher, as a retired annuitant), seconded by Council Member Meeks. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES – 7 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Leon, Balius, Rubalcava, Kurtz, Maahs, and Meeks); NOES – 0. Motion carried.

City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026

PUBLIC HEARINGS:

20. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 99-01

PREVIOUSLY APPROVED POINTE ANAHEIM INITIAL STUDY, MITIGATED

DECLARATION, AND ADDENDA
APPLICANT: GardenWalk Hotel II, LLC (assigned from GardenWalk Hotel I, LLC); 333 City Boulevard West, Suite 2000, Orange, CA 92868 and Westgate Resorts, Anaheim LLC; 5601 Windhover Drive, Orlando, FL 32819
PROJECT LOCATION: The property is located at 321 West Katella Avenue and 400 West Disney Way, between Disney Way and Katella Avenue, approximately 700 feet east of Harbor Boulevard.

REQUEST: Pursuant to Resolution No. 82R-565, governing the consideration of development agreements, the City Council will consider establishing new development timeframes for GardenWalk Hotel II, LLC (assigned from GardenWalk Hotel I, LLC) and Westgate Resorts Anaheim, LLC to comply with Development Agreement No. 99-01.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City Council will consider whether to find and determine that the previously-approved Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Declaration and Addenda, serve as the appropriate environmental documentation for the request (continued from the Council meeting January 27, Public Hearing Item No. 16).

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-010 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM establishing a performance time schedule for the commencement and completion of construction of Hotel 2 as set forth in the Second Amended and Restated Development Agreement No. 99-01 between the City of Anaheim and GardenWalk Hotel II, LLC, and determine that the previously approved Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND), and associated addenda, are the appropriate environmental documentation for this request.

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-011 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM establishing a performance time schedule for the commencement and completion of construction of Vacation Ownership Resort No. 1 as set forth in the Second Amended and Restated Development Agreement No. 99-01 between the City of Anaheim and Westgate Resorts Anaheim, LLC and determine that the previously approved Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND), and associated addenda, are the appropriate environmental documentation for this request.

Planning and Building Director Heather Allen reported that the item is a request from GardenWalk Hotel II, LLC and Westgate Resorts Anaheim, LLC to modify their respective performance timeframes associated with the GardenWalk Development Agreement. She stated that at the December 16th City Council meeting, the Council determined that both parties were not in compliance with their performance timeframes and directed staff to notice a public hearing to establish new time schedules for compliance. She noted that the public hearing was originally set for January 27, 2026 and continued to February 24 at the request of the applicants.

Director Allen reported that in 1999, the City of Anaheim and Pointe Anaheim LLC, executed a Development Agreement for this Project. Following the execution of the Development Agreement, the original developer, Pointe Anaheim, LLC, assigned the Development Agreement to multiple responsible parties. She stated that STC GardenWalk, LLC was responsible for the retail, dining and entertainment component and the parking structure, all of which have been constructed. She reported that GardenWalk Hotel I and II, LLC are responsible for the development of two hotels; the JW City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026

Marriott Anaheim Resort (466-rooms completed in August 2020) and a hotel at the northeast corner of the site along Disney Way. She shared that Westgate Resorts Anaheim, LLC is responsible for the vacation ownership resort component of the project, which would be constructed on top of the parking structure at the western portion of the site along Katella Avenue.

Director Allen reported that the previous performance timeframe for GardenWalk Hotel II required construction to begin on the hotel by November 2025, which did not occur. She explained that GardenWalk Hotel II submitted a letter of request indicating that they were not able to meet the performance timeframe due to financial reasons, updates to the Building Code, and unexpected passing of a partner in their joint venture. She reported that they are requesting that the timeframes associated with the second hotel be extended five years to require construction to begin by November 2030, with construction completion by May 2033. She added that GardenWalk Hotel II has a proven track record for developing projects in The Anaheim Resort and are very familiar with the City’s entitlement process. She noted that the proposed timeframe extension would allow for more than adequate time to develop plans for the City’s review and for construction to be initiated.

Director Allen stated that the previous performance timeframe for Westgate Resorts Anaheim required building permit issuance of the vacation ownership building by April 2025, which did not occur. She reported that Westgate Resorts Anaheim submitted a letter of request explaining that they previously secured an architect and hotel flag, but the deal with the development partner fell through.

The developer is requesting that the timeframes associated with the vacation ownership component be modified to require construction to begin by October 2028 and finish construction by October 2030. She added that Westgate has indicated that it intends to market the entitled project to prospective investment partners and purchasers. She shared that Westgate believes that maintaining the Agreement will provide potential investors with greater certainty and predictability during any ownership transition, reduce regulatory risk, and enhance the overall marketability and feasibility of successfully delivering the project.

Director Allen reported that staff current market conditions and would assist both parties in providing high-quality projects that would enhance the overall Resort area. She noted that the revised timeframes also place the construction commencement after the conclusion of the Olympics in 2028 and allow for staggered construction between the two projects. She added that the City Council may accept the staff recommendation or can direct staff to set a subsequent public hearing to modify or terminate the Development Agreement as to a specific party.

DISCUSSION: Council Member concurred with staff’s recommendation She stated that the property owner had expressed continued interest in developing the property but had been impacted by broader economic uncertainties, including tariffs and interest rates. She noted that the staff recommendation would provide flexibility and additional time for the owner to pursue a long-term development plan or potential sale of the property, and expressed support for staff’s recommendation.

Director Allen confirmed the action would occur via two separate votes following the public hearing.

In response to Mayor Aitken, Director Allen confirmed the developer can return to Council to begin construction earlier than 2030, but no later than. She explained that the developer would need to submit a final site plan as the next step in the process, which would then proceed to building permits.

She noted that the project could move forward at any time, provided construction begins by the required deadline.

City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026

Mayor Aitken inquired whether staff would maintain ongoing communication with the property owners during the extension period to identify any changes or opportunities for the City to help facilitate construction and remove potential obstacles. She expressed support for the long-standing family business and a desire to see the project move forward sooner rather than later. She inquired whether the entitlement was limited to vacation ownership/timeshare uses or if a future purchaser could instead develop a traditional hotel on the site.

Director Allen explained the entitlement is not limited and the developer could build a regular hotel depending on the extent of the changes. She confirmed the developer is not required to build vacation ownerships. She noted that a concept in review with the development partner that did not move forward was to develop two hotels.

At 8:52 p.m., Mayor Aitken opened the public hearing.

Marc Herbert expressed concerns regarding the proposed project extension, questioning the lack of penalties for noncompliance with existing deadlines and whether alternative developers or uses for the property had been considered. He raised concerns about changing economic conditions and the long-term demand for hotel development and suggested the site could instead be reconsidered for affordable or mixed-use housing to help address the City’s housing shortage. He encouraged the City to explore partnerships and alternative development concepts that could support workforce and affordable housing needs.

City Clerk Theresa Bass reported that no electronic public comments were received related to Public Hearing Item No. 20.

At 8:57 p.m., Mayor Aitken closed the public hearing.

DISCUSSION: Council Member Rubalcava expressed support for staff’s recommendation and clarified that the property is privately owned entitled land, not publicly owned or owned by Disney.

She also noted that the site is not included in the City’s Housing Element and is not zoned for housing.

MOTION: Council Member Kurtz moved to approve RESOLUTION NO. 2026-010 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM establishing a performance time schedule for the commencement and completion of construction of Hotel 2 as set forth in the Second Amended and Restated Development Agreement No. 99-01 between the City of Anaheim and GardenWalk Hotel II, LLC, and determine that the previously approved Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND), and associated addenda, are the appropriate environmental documentation for this request and RESOLUTION NO. 2026-011 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM establishing a performance time schedule for the commencement and completion of construction of Vacation Ownership Resort No. 1 as set forth in the Second Amended and Restated Development Agreement No. 99-01 between the City of Anaheim and Westgate Resorts Anaheim, LLC and determine that the previously approved Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND), and associated addenda, are the appropriate environmental documentation for this request, seconded by Council Member Rubalcava. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES – 7 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Leon, Balius, Rubalcava, Kurtz, Maahs, and Meeks); NOES – 0. Motion carried.

21. DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION NO. 2024-00058

GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
AMENDMENT NO. 18 TO THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 92-2 AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 18.116 (ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 92-2 City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026

(SP 92-2) ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS)

INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM NO. 395

ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT
OWNER REPRESENTATIVE: Alice Hsu; 515 W. Katella Avenue, Anaheim, CA 92802 APPLICANT AGENT: Kenneth Pang; 150 El Camino Real, #112, Tustin, CA 92780 PROJECT LOCATION: The property is located at 515 West Katella Avenue, approximately 260 feet east of Harbor Boulevard.

REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of an increase in the number of hotel rooms at the Wyndham Hotel from the previously-approved 78 rooms to 107 rooms, and changes to accessory use areas. The request requires approval of the following entitlements: (1) General Plan Amendment to create a new density category, “Medium Density (Modified B)” for the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan (ARSP); (2) Amendment No. 18 to the ARSP to create a new density category “Medium Density (Modified B),” including an amendment to the Zoning Code; (3) Administrative Adjustment to allow a 28% reduction in the number of parking spaces required by the Code.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City Council will consider whether to approve and adopt an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) and Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) No. 395, and determine that the IS/MND and MMP No. 395 prepared for the project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) are adequate to serve as the appropriate environmental documentation for the project.

ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION:

Approved Resolution No. PC2025-041 recommending that the City Council approve and adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 395 for the Wyndham Hotel Density Modification Project; Resolution No. PC2025-042 recommending that the City Council approve and adopt a proposed General Plan Land Use Amendment; Resolution No. PC2025-043 approving an Administrative Adjustment for a reduction in Code- required parking for the Wyndham Hotel and making certain findings in connection therewith; and recommended approval of the project. VOTE: 7-0 (Chairperson Walker and Commissioners Abdulrahman, Castro, Kelly, Lieberman, Perez, and Tran-Martin voted yes) (Planning Commission meeting of December 1, 2025).

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-012 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM to approve and adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 395 for the Wyndham Hotel Density Modification Project (DEV2024- 00058) (515 West Katella Avenue).

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-013 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM amending the General Plan Land Use Element of the City of Anaheim (DEV2024-00058) (515 West Katella Avenue).

ORDINANCE NO. 6621 (INTRODUCTION) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM approving and adopting amendments to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (SP 92-2) and Chapter 18.116 (Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (SP 92-2) Zoning and Development Standards) of Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code (Amendment No. 18 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan) (DEV2024-00058).

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-014 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM approving an administrative adjustment for a reduction in code-required City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026

parking for the Wyndham Hotel and making certain findings in connection therewith (DEV2024-00058) (515 West Katella Avenue).

Director Allen stated that the item is a public hearing for the existing Wyndham Hotel located at 515 West Katella Avenue in the Anaheim Resort. She noted that the Planning Commission recommended approval of this project at their December 1, 2025 meeting. She reported that the project site is located on the north side of Katella Avenue, east of Harbor Boulevard and was originally approved by the City in 1995 for 72 suite-type keyed rooms.

Director Allen reported that in 2024, the City became aware that the hotel was operating with more keyed rooms than what had been originally approved for the site. She shared that a Code Enforcement case was opened in 2024 and inspections confirmed the increase. She explained that following the original construction, some of the two bedroom / two bathroom suites (1 keyed room) were converted into two keyed individual rooms. She stated that those and other unpermitted modifications resulted in a total of 107 keyed rooms and a conversion of approximately 6,400 square feet of accessory uses from serving hotel guests and employees to being open to the public. She added that the building footprint, overall square footage, sewer demand, site access, and on-site parking did not change from the previously-approved condition. She stated that other than work which may be required through the building permit process to legalize the unpermitted modifications, no new construction is proposed as part of the request.

Director Allen reported that in order to retain the additional keyed rooms and accessory uses open to non-hotel guests, the applicant requests: a General Plan Amendment; a Specific Plan Amendment; an Administrative Adjustment pertaining to parking; and the corresponding environmental analysis.

Director Allen stated that the site has a General Plan land use designation of Commercial Recreation which is unchanged. She reported that the C-R District in the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan allows for hotels, motels, convention and conference facilities, as well as restaurants, retail shops and entertainment facilities with development densities ranging from 50 rooms per gross acre to up to 345 rooms. She noted that the various development densities are identified in Table LU-4 of the General Plan. She stated that the project requests the addition of a new density category of “Medium Density (Modified B)” to Table LU-4, which would permit a maximum density of up to 107 rooms and 6,394 square feet of accessory uses open to the public.

Director Allen reported that similar to the General Plan Amendment, the amendment to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan would create the “Medium Density (Modified B)” category. She noted that the amendment would update exhibits and text within the Specific Plan document and relevant ARSP Code Chapter to reflect the new density category and change the density associated with the property from Low-Medium Density to Medium Density (Modified B). She stated that the proposed amendment would not change the boundaries of the existing specific plan or make any changes to the development standards that implement this designation. She added that modification of density within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan is consistent with prior Council action to increase density for specific properties following a project-specific evaluation of the infrastructure which supports the request.

Director Allen reported that the applicant requests a 28% reduction in the number of parking spaces required by the Code for the additional keyed rooms. She added that site is developed with 98 spaces, consistent with their original approval. She shared that Code now allows a deviation of up to 50% from the Code-required parking for hotels within the Resort through an administrative adjustment and supported by a parking survey. She reported that a parking survey conducted at the existing hotel identified the highest demand for parking to be 79 spaces. She stated that the survey supports City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026

the adequacy of the 98 spaces to meet the parking requirement for the project, justifying the 28% reduction (well under the max 50% allowed). She added that staff have not received any complaints regarding parking from the surrounding business owners. She reported that to ensure that there are no impacts in the future should operations change, a condition of approval is included in the draft resolution that would require the introduction of alternative solutions such as valet or off-site parking.

Director Allen reported that an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared to evaluate the environmental impacts of the project and to identify necessary mitigation measures. She noted that environmental analysis concluded that the existing infrastructure capacity is sufficient to accommodate the proposed density increase, and that the project impacts would be less than significant level with the implementation of mitigation measures from previously-certified EIR No. 313 and SEIR No. 340 for the ARSP. She stated that the proposed project is consistent with the goals and policies of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan by maintaining additional accommodation options for visitors of the resort area. She added that the project would allow an increase in hotel density and accessory uses for the existing hotel, which has been operating with the requested increase in density for several years. She concluded that the additional density can be accommodated through the existing infrastructure, and therefore, staff recommends Council approval of the project.

DISCUSSION: Mayor Aitken inquired if the property owners have paid Transient Occupancy Taxes (TOT) on the 105 rooms or 72 rooms.

Director Allen explained that the property owner has paid for the actual number of rooms.

In response to Mayor Aitken, Director Allen explained that the application processing fees for the request are deposit-based and total approximately $35,000 for departmental review. She noted that the applicant funded a separate environmental review contract, which exceeded $58,000, although the full amount was not expended. She added that any other taxes, fees, or costs incurred by the City have been reimbursed.

Mayor Aitken inquired whether the City should consider future zoning or land use changes to allow higher-density development on similar parcels in the area, noting that many of the existing hotels were developed prior to major resort-area expansions and improvements. She inquired whether increasing allowable density on such properties may be worth evaluating in the future.

Director Allen confirmed the possibility of evaluating future zoning and land use changes to permit higher-density development on similar resort-area parcels, noting that many existing hotel properties were developed prior to significant growth and improvements in the area.

Mayor Aitken requested whether the City could explore a broader area-wide zoning or planning update for hotel properties, rather than processing individual amendments on a case-by-case basis, and suggested the possibility of shared participation by hotel property owners to help offset the costs and resource demands of such an effort.

Director Allen acknowledged that a broader, multi-parcel planning approach could create efficiencies of scale, particularly for environmental review and development planning. She noted that concepts such as shared parking among hotel properties could help reduce costs and support redevelopment on smaller or constrained parcels.

Mayor Pro Tem Leon requested clarification on the project timeline and asked staff to confirm whether the property owner had expanded the project from 78 to 107 rooms without the City’s knowledge until the discrepancy was later brought to staff’s attention.

City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026

Director Allen clarified that the project was originally approved for 78 rooms, with 72 rooms ultimately constructed. She explained that during a TOT audit in 2024, and through review of the business license records, the City became aware that additional rooms had been added beyond the originally approved amount.

In response to Mayor Pro Tem Leon, Director Allen explained that the property owner had not obtained the required permits for the unapproved work. She explained that through the Code Enforcement process, the owner was required to obtain an investigation permit to determine next steps. She noted the owner had the option to either remove the unpermitted improvements and restore the property to its original condition or pursue legalization of the work through the planning and building permit process. She explained that the owner chose to retain the improvements and, if approved by the Council, would be required to complete the building permit process and bring the work into compliance with current Code requirements. She confirmed that the legalization process would include the necessary inspections and code compliance review.

In response to Council Member Balius, Director Allen confirmed that explained that, had the applicant sought approval prospectively, the process would have been the same as prior hotel projects, including the Hilton Garden Inn, Roadhouse, and Hyatt, by requesting an increase in density through the formal planning process rather than addressing it retroactively after construction.

Council Member Balius inquired whether other hotel operators with larger suites or room configurations could pursue a similar process in the future to convert existing units into additional rooms through the City’s established approval process.

Director Allen reported the process would be similar. She explained that the City has not placed a cap on additional hotel density in the resort area and continues to evaluate requests on a project-by- project basis. She noted that similar conversions or redevelopment proposals may be considered if the infrastructure can support the increased room count, including evaluating impacts on utilities such as sewer capacity. She also noted that similar approvals have been granted for other hotel properties in the past.

In response to Council Member Balius, Director Allen explained that current code provisions allow hotels to reduce parking requirements by up to 50% if certain conditions are met, such as providing rideshare pickup and drop-off spaces supported by a parking study. She noted that, in this case, the property has sufficient parking capacity beyond the originally approved room count and aligns with the resort area’s “park once” philosophy to reduce vehicle use. She stated that as an added safeguard, conditions of approval authorize the Planning Director to require additional parking management measures, such as valet or off-site parking, if future issues arise.

Council Member Kurtz acknowledged that the City’s audit process effectively identified the unpermitted additional hotel rooms, noting that the property owner had continued paying the appropriate transient occupancy taxes and was not concealing the increased room count. She also commended staff for working collaboratively with hotel operators to explore redevelopment opportunities and flexibility for maximizing property potential, stating that the City’s willingness to work with hoteliers may encourage additional reinvestment and improvements in the Resort area.

At 9:18 p.m., Mayor Aitken opened the public hearing.

Kenneth Pang, architect for the property owner, thanked the City Council and staff for their review and collaboration throughout the application process. He noted that the environmental review found no significant impacts and emphasized that the property has been operating at its current capacity for City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026

many years without substantial change. He also introduced the property owner, Alice Hsu, who was present to provide additional background and context regarding the project.

Alice Hsu, representing the owner, addressed the Council in support of the application, explaining that the discrepancy between the City’s approved room count and the hotel’s actual operation dates back to the original construction in 1999 and that the reasons for the discrepancy are unknown due to the passing of the original owner and contractor. She stated that the hotel has operated at its current room count for 27 years without issue and requested that the City correct the discrepancy to preserve the property’s operational viability and brand affiliation. She noted that environmental and operational studies support the current use and emphasized the economic benefits to the City, including TOT revenue and local employment. She shared that the average room rate is $200 per night, generating over $334,000 in annual TOT taxes. She highlighted the property’s 27 years of successful operation and requested Council’s consideration and approval to correct the issue.

Marc Herbert expressed concerns regarding the City’s Code Enforcement practices, questioning how the unpermitted hotel room conversion went undetected for many years and raising concerns about consistency and fairness in Code Enforcement across different areas of the City. He urged the City to review enforcement practices more broadly and consider whether similar compliance issues may exist at other hotel properties.

City Clerk Bass reported that no electronic public comments were received related to Public Hearing Item No. 21.

At 9:28 p.m., Mayor Aitken closed the public hearing.

DISCUSSION: Council Member Meeks thanked the property owner for cooperating with the City to resolve the room count discrepancy, acknowledging that the current ownership was not responsible for the original unpermitted conversion. She noted the owner’s willingness to cover processing and environmental review costs and to comply with required building inspections MOTION: Council Member Meeks moved to RESOLUTION NO. 2026-012 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM to approve and adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 395 for the Wyndham Hotel Density Modification Project (DEV2024-00058) (515 West Katella Avenue), RESOLUTION NO. 2026-013 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM amending the General Plan Land Use Element of the City of Anaheim (DEV2024-00058) (515 West Katella Avenue), introduce ORDINANCE NO. 6621 (INTRODUCTION) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM approving and adopting amendments to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (SP 92-2) and Chapter 18.116 (Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (SP 92-2) Zoning and Development Standards) of Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code (Amendment No. 18 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan) (DEV2024- 00058), and RESOLUTION NO. 2026-014 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM approving an administrative adjustment for a reduction in code-required parking for the Wyndham Hotel and making certain findings in connection therewith (DEV2024- 00058) (515 West Katella Avenue), seconded by Council Member Kurtz.

DISCUSSION: Council Member Rubalcava requested clarification on whether the comments made by the property owner and project architect introduced any new information or differed from staff’s recommendation.

Director Allen reported that the original record included 72 rooms.

City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026

Council Member Rubalcava confirmed with Director Allen that the property owner’s and architect’s comments were consistent with the staff recommendation.

In response to Mayor Pro Tem Leon, Director Allen clarified that when unpermitted construction is identified, property owners are generally given the option to pursue legalization of the work if it can be brought into compliance with current code requirements, or to remove and restore the property if compliance is not feasible. She confirmed that this process and set of options are applied consistently to all property owners.

MOTION: Council Member Meeks moved to RESOLUTION NO. 2026-012 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM to approve and adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 395 for the Wyndham Hotel Density Modification Project (DEV2024-00058) (515 West Katella Avenue), RESOLUTION NO. 2026-013 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM amending the General Plan Land Use Element of the City of Anaheim (DEV2024-00058) (515 West Katella Avenue), introduce ORDINANCE NO. 6621 (INTRODUCTION) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM approving and adopting amendments to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (SP 92-2) and Chapter 18.116 (Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (SP 92-2) Zoning and Development Standards) of Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code (Amendment No. 18 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan) (DEV2024- 00058), and RESOLUTION NO. 2026-014 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM approving an administrative adjustment for a reduction in code-required parking for the Wyndham Hotel and making certain findings in connection therewith (DEV2024- 00058) (515 West Katella Avenue), seconded by Council Member Kurtz. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES – 7 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Leon, Balius, Rubalcava, Kurtz, Maahs, and Meeks); NOES –

0. Motion carried. Ordinance introduced.

REPORT ON CLOSED SESSION ACTIONS: City Attorney Robert Fabela stated there was no reportable action for Item Nos. 1 and 3. For Item No. 2, the City Council voted 7-0 to approve the appointment of Greg Garcia as Interim City Manager.

PUBLIC COMMENTS (non-agenda items): None

COUNCIL AGENDA SETTING:

Mayor Pro Tem Leon requested that staff bring back options for replenishing funds for the current Contigo program and establishing a legal defense fund.

Mayor Aitken stated that she is happy to work with Mayor Pro Tem Leon regarding a pro bono legal work component.

Council Member Maahs requested a recognition for Blake's Place, a delicious barbecue restaurant located in District 5, celebrating 30 years of business.

Council Member Kurtz requested a recognition for E. Kate Rea, one of the founders of the Anaheim Ebell Club, in honor of her accomplishments and contributions to the community.

Council Member Rubalcava requested an item to discuss State rent control enforcement and possible implementation in Anaheim. She reiterated her prior request for a no-cause eviction policy protecting homeowners and renters.

City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026

Assistant City Manager Garcia confirmed that he would follow up on the request and provide a memo to Council.

Council Member Rubalcava stated that a memo would be acceptable; however, an agendized discussion would allow the Council to discuss policy considerations and enforcement expenses.

Assistant City Manager Garcia stated that staff would provide a memo and a discussion could be agendized for a future date.

Mayor Aitken requested that the memo include residents' options under the Fair Housing Act, whether violations are reported to the City, potential costs and funding sources to partner with the Public Law Center, and enforcement mechanisms.

Assistant City Manager Garcia shared that staff previously reviewed those items and can prepare a memo soon.

ADJOURNMENT: With no further business before the Council, Mayor Aitken adjourned the City Council at 9:36 p.m., in memory of Dick Edward Mosher, Jaime Llamas, and Paul Joseph Schiada.

Respectfully submitted,

Theresa Bass, CMC
City Clerk