Anaheim City Council
June 9, 2026

ANAHEIM CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 3, 2026
The regular meeting of March 3, 2026 was called to order at 3:34 P.M. in the Council Chamber of Anaheim City Hall, located at 200 South Anaheim Boulevard. The meeting notice, agenda, and related material were duly posted on February 26, 2026.

MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ashleigh E. Aitken and Council Members Carlos A. Leon, Ryan Balius, Norma Campos Kurtz, Kristen M. Maahs, and Natalie Meeks.

Council Member Natalie Rubalcava joined the meeting during Closed Session.

STAFF PRESENT: Interim City Manager Greg Garcia, City Attorney Robert Fabela, and City Clerk Theresa Bass
ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO CLOSED SESSION: None
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS: None
CLOSED SESSION: At 3:34 p.m., Mayor Aitken recessed to closed session for consideration of the following:

1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION
(Subdivision (d)(1) of Section 54956.9 of the California Government Code) Name of Case: Cordova, et. al.. v. City of Anaheim, et. al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 30-2021-01227584

2. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
(Subdivision (a) of Section 54957.6 of the California Government Code) Agency Designated Representative: Linda Andal, Human Resources Director Name of Employee Organizations: International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW), Local 47; and IBEW, Local 47 Part-Time Customer Service Employees; International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 47 (Professional Management and Part-Time Management Units)

3. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
(Subdivision (a) of Section 54957.6 of the California Government Code) Agency Designated Representative: Linda Andal, Human Resources Director Name of Employee Organization: Teamsters, Local 952
At 5:02 p.m., Mayor Aitken reconvened the Anaheim City Council.

MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ashleigh E. Aitken and Council Members Carlos A. Leon, Ryan Balius, Natalie Rubalcava, Norma Campos Kurtz, Kristen M. Maahs, and Natalie Meeks.

INVOCATION: Chaplain Nathan Zug, Anaheim Police and Fire Prior to the Flag Salute, Council Member Meeks expressed appreciation for the men and women serving in the armed forces, recognizing their service, dedication, and the support of their families.

FLAG SALUTE: Council Member Natalie Meeks
ITEM # 25
City Council Minutes of March 3, 2026

PRESENTATIONS: Recognizing Brent Finlay on his retirement as Chief Executive Officer of the Anaheim Family YMCA
Mayor Aitken recognized Brent Finlay for his leadership and dedicated service as Chief Executive Officer of the Anaheim Family YMCA. She noted that he led the organization with vision, integrity, and heart. She shared that under his leadership, the YMCA strengthened its programs, expanded its reach, and its impact across the community. She stated that he always put the organization’s mission first and people at the center of every decision and initiative. She shared that his genuine care for others would leave a lasting mark not only on the YMCA but also on the lives of countless Anaheim community members. She added that his legacy would remain a lasting part of the YMCA and thanked him for his service and commitment to the community.

Mr. Finlay expressed gratitude for the recognition and reflected on his service to the organization. He highlighted the strong partnership between the YMCA and the City, emphasized the collaborative programs including swim lessons, youth sports, recreation, and youth government initiatives, serving thousands of local youth. He thanked the City for its support and shared optimism for the continued success of the partnership. He highlighted his partner Julie Finlay and YMCA Board Member Trisha McDonald.

Recognizing the Girls Flag Football Varsity Team for winning the CIF-SS Division 5 Championship
Mayor Aitken shared that the Anaheim High School Girls Flag Football Varsity Team demonstrated determination and teamwork. She stated that their championship reflected months of hard work and discipline. She shared that the team has set a new standard for their school and girls’ athletics. She acknowledged the families and coaches who supported the team and congratulated them on their championship.

Recognizing Toastmasters International, Anaheim Club 2, for their 100th Anniversary
Mayor Aitken recognized Toastmasters Club 2 Anaheim for celebrating 100 years of service in the City. She shared that for a century, the club has empowered members to develop skills in public speaking, communication, and leadership. She noted that they have helped generations of members build confidence, lead with purpose, and find their voice. She congratulated them on 100 years of success.

ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA: None
PUBLIC COMMENTS (all agenda items): Prior to receipt of public comments, City Clerk Theresa Bass provided an outline of procedures for public comments, notice of translation services, and a brief decorum statement.

Mayor Aitken announced that for Public Hearing Item No. 10, the public hearing was opened and closed after public comment at the January 13th public hearing. She stated that the public hearing would not be reopened when the item is presented. She shared that the applicant and members of the public are welcome to provide public comments during the public comment portion of the meeting.

She reported that staff have assured that comments regarding the project during public comment for the meeting and prior meetings would be included in any administrative record, and would be considered by the Council. She added that the Council would have the ability to ask questions of speakers or the applicants when the item is considered.

City Council Minutes of March 3, 2026

City Clerk Theresa Bass reported that a total of 342 public comments were received electronically prior to 3:30 P.M. [A final total of 349 public comments were received electronically, 310 related to Public Hearing Item No. 10, distributed to the City Council, and made part of the official records]. – See Appendix.

Marc Herbert expressed concern regarding the City’s fire engine capacity and response readiness for the proposed Festival project. He stated that Anaheim has not placed orders for new fire engines despite an estimated four-year delivery timeline and noted concerns about the reassignment of a fire engine from Anaheim Hills to a new fire station near Angel Stadium. He emphasized the wildfire risks in Anaheim Hills and urged the City to prioritize purchasing additional fire engines in anticipation of future fire station needs, including the planned Fire Station 13 project.

David Green spoke in opposition to the proposed Festival project, citing concerns over traffic congestion near the 91 freeway and concerns regarding emergency evacuation access in Anaheim Hills. He described prior wildfire evacuation experiences in which severe traffic congestion limited residents’ ability to leave the area safely and expressed concern that additional housing development would worsen traffic and public safety conditions. He urged the City Council to consider the concerns raised by the Planning Commission and local fire authorities, deny the project, and continue to consider other options.

Mark R. Daniels shared that the geographical area is not suited for the Festival project. He stated that increased traffic and population density could worsen existing traffic congestion and create additional public safety risks during an emergency situation, including wildfire evacuations. He urged the Council to prioritize public safety and deny the project.

Joseph Guaderrama spoke in opposition to the Festival project. He expressed concern over wildfire evacuation, traffic congestion, and public safety. He recalled evacuation difficulties experienced during the 2017 wildfire, including severe traffic congestion on local roadways. He added that the proposed parking would not support the project and could not be regulated. He expressed concern that the proposed project would significantly increase vehicle traffic without additional evacuation routes or infrastructure improvements. He urged the City Council to vote against the project.

Mike Robbins criticized the influence of campaign contributions and corporate interests in local government decision-making. He expressed concerns regarding funding for public safety and emergency services. He noted that Disneyland does not pay taxes on admissions and fees compared to 6% in Florida. He urged the City Council to prioritize residents’ interests and public services, and to charge fees and parking fees for fire protection and infrastructure funding.

Stephanie Mercadante expressed opposition to the proposed Festival project. She cited wildfire safety, evacuation capacity, traffic congestion, and compatibility concerns. She stated that the project’s scale and density were inappropriate for an area designated in a Very High Fire Severity Zone. She expressed concern that the existing roadway network could not safely accommodate additional residents or vehicles during emergency evacuations. She noted that the proposed density exceeded nearby residential zoning and urged the Council to prioritize infrastructure, public safety, and community compatibility before approving additional development in the area.

G. Price expressed concerns regarding the proposed parking impacts for the Festival project. She explained that the project would not provide sufficient parking for residents, visitors, and existing commercial uses. She questioned the data used in the parking study, explaining that the project would create a parking deficit under current Code requirements. She stated that the project requires 1,075 spaces, compared to the proposed 893 spaces. She argued that inadequate parking could City Council Minutes of March 3, 2026

negatively impact nearby businesses, increase neighborhood overflow parking, and worsen traffic and safety conditions. She urged the City Council to reject the project.

Jeanine Robbins urged Council Members to remain attentive to residents’ concerns and expressed criticism regarding campaign contributions and outside influences in decisions. She requested the release of information related to an officer-involved shooting and referenced the California Public Records Act regarding disclosure of the officers’ identities. She raised concerns regarding Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) compliance and enforcement related to unpermitted hotel room additions. She expressed opposition to the proposed Festival project, citing public safety and wildfire evacuation concerns, and urged the Council to reject the development.

Kenneth Batiste urged the Council to prioritize residents’ safety and concerns, including requests related to the release of information in the death of Albert Arzola. He expressed concerns regarding fireworks and contamination of underground wells. He opposed the Festival project, referencing prior wildfire conditions and evacuation challenges. He argued that adding additional residential units in the area would increase risks to public safety and urged the Council to reject the project.

R. Joshua Collins addressed issues related to homelessness, affordable housing, rent control, and public safety. He encouraged the City Council to support additional affordable housing opportunities and rental assistance programs to address housing needs in the community. He raised concerns regarding policing practices and accountability for the death of Albert Arzola. He urged the City to prioritize compassion, de-escalation, and community trust.

Doug Robbins expressed opposition to the proposed Festival project. He cited concerns regarding public safety, wildfire evacuation, and the adequacy of the City’s emergency planning. He highlighted the community’s opposition to the project and urged the Council to prioritize residents’ concerns and deny the project. He called for greater responsiveness to the community’s input and criticized the influence of special interests.

Betty Farnsworth urged the City Council to reject the proposed Festival. She expressed concerns regarding wildfire evacuation, traffic congestion, and public safety. She stated that the addition of more residential units and vehicles would worsen evacuation conditions during emergencies and emphasized the need for infrastructure improvements prior to approving additional development in the area. She also questioned the data used in the evacuation analysis and urged the City Council to prioritize community safety and deny the project.

Linda Merrell opposed the Festival project, citing concerns regarding wildfire evacuation, public safety, and emergency preparedness in Anaheim Hills. She referenced prior wildfire experiences, changing wind conditions, and traffic congestion during evacuations. She explained that existing evacuation plans would be insufficient during a major fire event. She expressed concerns about increased risks to nearby senior housing and urged the Council to reject the project.

Teresa Ploum cited concerns related to wildfire risks, evacuation safety, traffic congestion, parking reductions, and the loss of commercial use in Anaheim Hills related to the Festival project. She stated that the project site is located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone and argued that the proposed residential density would increase public safety risks without providing sufficient community benefits or affordability. She urged the Council to prioritize resident safety and deny the project. She expressed support for the Arzola family and requested the release of information related to the incident.

Stephanie Thackeray expressed support for the Arzola family and requested the release of footage related to the shooting. She opposed the proposed Festival project, citing concerns regarding existing City Council Minutes of March 3, 2026

traffic congestion, wildfire evacuation safety, and the potential risks associated with adding additional residential density in Anaheim Hills. She urged the Council to prioritize resident safety and deny the project.

Andrew Winger shared support for the Arzola family and requested that the City assist the family in obtaining information and closure. He expressed opposition to the proposed Festival project, citing concerns regarding wildfire evacuation times, emergency planning, and public safety in Anaheim Hills. She referenced evacuation modeling studies and questioned the effectiveness and implementation of the City’s Know Your Way evacuation plan. He argued that existing data and community experiences demonstrate significant evacuation challenges during wildfire events. He expressed concern regarding the project’s environmental analysis, public opposition to the proposal, and potential liability risks to the City.

Joni Gaynor opposed the proposed Festival project. She shared concerns regarding wildfire evacuation safety, traffic impacts, and the adequacy of the Know Your Way plan. She argued that the area could not safely accommodate additional residents and vehicles during wildfire evacuations. She referenced prior statements made by the project developer and City officials regarding traffic and flaws with the Environmental Impact Report (EIR). She noted that a letter from Chatten-Brown Law Group outlined several flaws in the EIR. She urged the Council to prioritize public safety and deny the project.

Steve Herr expressed concern regarding wildfire evacuations and infrastructure concerns in District 6 related to the Festival project. He stated that Anaheim Hills has limited evacuation routes compared to other areas in the City. He argued that the project conflicted with several goals outlined in the City’s Strategic Plan. He urged the Council to prioritize additional evacuation infrastructure and vote against the project.

Dean Gaynor spoke in opposition to the proposed Festival project, citing concerns regarding wildfire evacuation, traffic impacts, and public safety. He referenced personal experiences with prior evacuations and argued that the project’s environmental impact analysis identified significant and unavoidable traffic impacts that could not be fully mitigated. He also stated that the area had historically been planned for commercial development due to infrastructure limitations. He added that introducing high-density residential development in the area would increase risks during emergency situations. He requested that the Council consider alternative housing locations with greater evacuation capacity and roadway access. He argued that additional residential density would increase the number of residents and vehicles attempting to evacuate during a wildfire emergency and urged the Council to maintain the existing zoning and prioritize public safety by denying the project.

Mark Fortezzo commented on the traffic congestion in Anaheim Hills. He shared his prior wildfire evacuation experiences, noting that current roadway conditions are already heavily congested. He explained that additional development would further strain evacuation routes and emergency access in Anaheim Hills. He urged the City Council to deny the project.

John L. Mazzarella thanked Council Members for meeting with residents at the District Open Houses.

He expressed opposition to the proposed Festival project. He stated that wildfire risk and evacuation capacity are the primary concerns for District 6 residents and argued that additional housing in a high-fire-risk area would increase public safety dangers during emergencies. He urged the Council to consider residents’ experiences and the potential impacts of the project on evacuation and safety conditions.

City Council Minutes of March 3, 2026

Charles (Chuck) Hill shared his personal experience evacuating during a previous fire, including evacuation challenges and property damage. He questioned the City’s Know Your Way plan, expressing concerns regarding emergency preparedness, traffic congestion, and public outreach regarding evacuation planning. He also noted concerns about communication efforts to residents, particularly seniors and individuals without internet access, and urged the Council to prioritize public safety in considering the proposed Festival project.

Elizabeth Hansburg expressed support for the proposed Festival project, stating that redeveloping underperforming commercial properties with multifamily housing is a common strategy for increasing housing opportunities without impacting existing single-family neighborhoods. She noted that Anaheim Hills has limited housing diversity and affordability options and argued that additional multifamily housing would provide opportunities for younger residents and individuals unable to afford single-family homes in the area. She emphasized the importance of distributing housing growth throughout all areas of Anaheim and encouraged the Council to find ways to accommodate additional housing in Anaheim Hills while addressing community concerns.

Kerry Pickens opposed the proposed Festival project, citing concerns regarding compatibility with the Anaheim Hills community, traffic impacts, public safety, and the proposed parking structure. She stated that the multi-level parking structure and high-density residential development were inconsistent with the surrounding neighborhood and expressed concerns that the project could contribute to increased crime and parking-related issues. She also disputed comparisons between the project’s anticipated traffic impacts and the movie theater use. She urged the Council to deny the project.

Shelly Robbins raised concerns regarding transparency, public disclosure, and potential lobbying activity related to housing development proposals, including the Festival project. She shared inconsistencies in public calendars and inconsistencies in meeting disclosures involving City officials, developers, lobbyists, and other stakeholders. She questioned interactions between developers and Planning Commission members prior to project votes. She expressed concerns about potential undue influence in the development review process.

Dr. Rick Moyer expressed opposition to the proposed Festival project, citing concerns regarding wildfire evacuation, traffic congestion, and public safety. He referenced personal evacuation experiences during the Canyon 2 Fire. He described severe gridlock and delayed evacuation times.

He discussed the health dangers associated with smoke inhalation during wildfire evacuations and expressed concern that additional development would worsen evacuation conditions. He also referenced increased commuter traffic in Anaheim Hills and questioned whether the project’s potential benefits outweighed the associated public safety risks.

Grace McGee urged the City Council to reject the proposed Festival project, citing concerns regarding wildfire evacuation, traffic congestion, and public safety in a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone. She stated that the proposed development would add significant traffic during emergency evacuations, impacting nearby senior housing residents, childcare facilities, and surrounding neighborhoods. She expressed concerns regarding limited evacuation routes along Festival Drive and Santa Ana Canyon Road, existing evacuation plans, and the suitability of the site as a shelter location during wildfires. She referenced the Altadena and Palisades fires and the Council’s previous denial of the Deer Canyon project. She urged the City Council to deny the project.

Brian McGee referenced recent wildfires in Altadena and Pacific Palisades, emphasizing concerns about emergency notification systems, evacuation capacity, and the risks associated with adding high-density housing near Canyon evacuation routes. He suggested alternative locations for housing developments and urged the Council to prioritize public safety. He commented on existing traffic City Council Minutes of March 3, 2026

congestion near the project site and the potential for severe gridlock during an emergency. He requested that the City Council deny the project.

Doug Hill stated that elected officials have a responsibility to protect residents. He shared his experience evacuating during previous wildfires and the delays due to traffic congestion. He raised concerns regarding limited evacuation routes, the City’s evacuation planning efforts, and the ability for first responders to assist vulnerable residents during a wildfire. He shared that the community does not support the proposed development and urged the Council to deny the project.

Tammy Hill questioned the practicality of phased evacuation zones in the Know Your Way evacuation plan during a fast-moving wildfire. She reported that each zone would require numerous buses to evacuate and raised concerns regarding the capacity and availability of school buses and certified drivers needed to evacuate students. She commented on the limited number of ambulances and emergency personnel available to assist senior care facilities during an emergency. She urged the City Council to further evaluate evacuation logistics and prioritize community safety.

Charles Bertocchini shared his unfamiliarity with the Know Your Way evacuation plan and questioned the effectiveness of community outreach efforts. He expressed concerns regarding the rising cost and availability of homeowners' insurance. He noted that several major insurance providers reportedly declined to insure homes in the area due to fire risks. He shared his personal experience with his wife being unable to evacuate during a previous fire due to traffic congestion. He urged the City Council to deny the project.

Julian Navarro expressed support for the proposed Festival project. He explained that the development is important to address the housing demand in Orange County. He stated that additional housing could provide opportunities for working professionals, young families, and longtime residents to remain in the community, reduce commuter impacts, and support environmental goals. He noted that the new development could generate economic benefits through job creation, increased property tax revenue, and infrastructure investment. He urged the City Council to approve the project.

Afzal Hakim shared his upbringing in the City and building a future in the City. He explained that rising housing costs have made it difficult for younger adults to afford to stay in the City. He noted that additional housing would provide opportunities for young residents to establish independence and build their futures within the City. He urged the City Council to approve the project.

Anthony Adams stated that rising housing costs and limited housing availability have made it difficult for young adults to remain in Anaheim. He shared that additional housing opportunities would help younger residents establish independence, remain in the community where they grew up, and reduce the need to relocate or commute long distances. He added that the project would support local jobs and provide opportunities for the next generation to build their futures in Anaheim and urged the Council to approve the project.

Aaron Barajas expressed support for the Festival project and thanked the City Council for considering public comments. He acknowledged community concerns regarding wildfire safety but stated that residents who choose to live in the area are already aware of the associated fire risks. He emphasized the need for additional housing opportunities for graduating students and younger residents seeking to establish independence in Southern California. He urged the City Council to support the project.

Engler Fish Phelps expressed concern regarding the City’s Know Your Way evacuation plan and questioned the reliability and effectiveness of the notification and evacuation system. He stated that after attending community meetings and reviewing the plan, there remained uncertainty regarding City Council Minutes of March 3, 2026

evacuation notifications, zone procedures, and communication methods during an emergency. He expressed concern over the availability of Police and Fire personnel to conduct evacuations and the accessibility and functionality of the Anaheim Alert system. He stated that the current evacuation plan lacked dependable communication measures and urged the Council not to approve the project.

Andrea Phelps urged the Council to deny the Festival Center project in its current form, citing concerns regarding insufficient parking, traffic congestion, and evacuation challenges. She stated that the proposed parking structure would not adequately accommodate residents, guests, retail patrons, or employees, and questioned parking assumptions and calculations presented by staff. She raised concerns regarding the lack of detail surrounding the proposed parking management plan and the potential spillover impacts on nearby businesses and commercial parking areas. She recommended that an evacuation plan specific to the development be required due to concerns about evacuating both the residential units and parking structure during an emergency. She requested that the City Council consider reducing the number of units for the development.

Tim James with the California Grocers Association spoke regarding the self-checkout ordinance and expressed concerns that grocery industry representatives had not been consulted prior to the discussion. He requested that the Council delay providing direction on the ordinance until grocers have been engaged in the process. He stated that similar self-checkout regulations in other jurisdictions have resulted in the removal of self-checkout services, increased enforcement challenges, with no demonstrated reduction in retail theft. He added that employees are already protected under existing policies, self-checkout provisions were recently addressed through collective bargaining agreements, and consumers increasingly prefer self-checkout for convenience. He urged the City Council to review industry data and experiences from other jurisdictions and to collaborate with Anaheim grocers before moving the policy forward.

Anthony Alcerro expressed support for the proposed Festival project, citing housing affordability challenges facing young adults in the area. He stated that despite having stable employment, rising housing costs have made it difficult for many younger residents to live independently within the community where they grew up. He described the project as an opportunity for younger generations to remain in Anaheim Hills and maintain access to the area’s schools, diversity, and quality of life. He acknowledged community concerns regarding wildfire safety and evacuation infrastructure. He shared that the issues should be addressed alongside the need for additional housing opportunities and urged the Council to move forward with the project.

Irma Ramirez shared her support for the Festival project, stating that while development has occurred extensively in other parts of Anaheim, there has been limited development in District 6. She stated that approving the project would promote district equity and provide future opportunities for Anaheim Hills residents, and urged the Council to vote in favor of the project.

Janet expressed support for the Festival project, stating that additional housing in Anaheim Hills would provide greater access and opportunity for families seeking to live in the area due to its schools, safety, and quality of life. She stated that development has progressed in other districts despite opposition. She shared that the project could reduce long commuting times for workers.

Juan Carlos expressed support for the Festival project and additional housing opportunities, stating that many younger residents may otherwise be forced to leave California due to housing affordability challenges. He acknowledged that growth can create challenges but stated that those issues should be addressed as part of the community’s development and urged the Council to support the project.

City Council Minutes of March 3, 2026

Cecil Jordan Corkern expressed concern over messages in Disney’s content. He shared that he has collected notes and documentation regarding his concerns. He expressed concern for the community and child safety.

Gio Gambineri expressed support for the proposed Festival development. He acknowledged community concerns regarding parking, traffic, privacy, and wildfire safety. He shared that the concerns should be carefully evaluated through the City’s planning and fire safety review processes and expressed confidence in City staff and the Fire Marshal to assess project safety standards. He emphasized the need for additional housing opportunities for working families seeking to remain in their communities. He added that the project would revitalize an aging commercial center by replacing large surface parking areas with housing, landscaping, and integrated design features intended to create a more active and cohesive mixed-use environment. He urged the City Council to approve the project.

Ronny Vandermeer addressed concerns regarding traffic safety, parking impacts, and residential development near Colony Park. He stated that since the development was constructed, the area has experienced increased parking congestion, speeding, and traffic-related incidents, including a vehicle collision that damaged the speaker’s property. He requested the ability to rebuild an existing wall on the property and expressed frustration regarding responses received from City representatives concerning traffic and safety concerns. He called for the Council to listen to constituents and urged the City to take stronger action regarding traffic calming, pedestrian safety, and public safety concerns.

Sophie Nadel expressed support for additional affordable housing in Anaheim Hills. She referenced personal experiences during the 2018 wildfires and acknowledged community concerns regarding fire safety, while also noting increased investment in fire prevention and emergency response resources in recent years. She stated that rising housing costs and the increasing cost of living have made homeownership unattainable for many younger residents returning to Orange County. She added that creating additional housing opportunities would support future generations by providing access to quality schools, community amenities, and the opportunity to remain in the area where they grew up and urged the Council to approve the project.

Julie Filppi clarified that the project would include moderate-income housing rather than affordable housing and stated that many young residents would still be unable to afford the units. She referenced concerns identified in the City’s Safety Element regarding neighborhoods with limited evacuation access and stated that infrastructure improvements have not been implemented to address those issues. She added that wind studies were insufficient for the extreme wind conditions in the area. She noted that she has been raising wildfire evacuation and infrastructure concerns with the City for more than a decade, including for the Deer Canyon project. She urged the City Council to deny the project.

Leslie Lopez addressed the City Council regarding the death of her cousin Albert Arzola. She expressed concerns about police conduct, transparency, and community trust. She described alleged harassment by police officers near the family residence, criticized the lack of public information regarding the officer involved, and stated that community members who witnessed the incident are fearful and traumatized. She called for accountability and justice in connection with the incident and expressed concerns regarding the treatment of minority communities by law enforcement. She also expressed opposition to the Festival project due to safety concerns and urged the City Council to deny the project.

Caro Lopez expressed concerns regarding the release of the unedited camera footage for the death of Albert Arzola. She described alleged harassment of the Arzola family by the Anaheim Police City Council Minutes of March 3, 2026

Department. She criticized the City and the Police Department due to a lack of transparency and accountability. She called for the immediate release of the camera footage.

Christina Lopez thanked community members for their continued support of the Arzola family and ongoing calls for justice following the death of Albert Arzola. She criticized City leadership and elected officials due to a lack of action and accountability and encouraged community engagement and participation in future elections. She stated that residents should support leaders who demonstrate integrity, courage, and responsiveness to community concerns regarding policing and public safety.

Grace Arzola addressed the City Council regarding the death of Albert Arzola and expressed concerns regarding the conduct of Anaheim Police Department officers toward the family following the incident. She thanked Chief Cid for providing partial video footage of the incident but alleged continued intimidation and harassment by police officers, including incidents involving patrol vehicles near the family residence. She requested additional oversight and accountability regarding police conduct and urged the Council to support efforts to improve the Police Department. She commented on the importance of youth programs and community resources. She raised questions regarding grant allocations by the Anaheim community and concerns related to wildfire prevention and public safety.

Sergio Pelayo expressed support for the Arzola family and shared concerns regarding the circumstances surrounding the death of Albert Arzola. He described the loss as tragic for the family and community and avoidable. He shared opposition to the proposed Festival project, adding that while housing affordability is challenging for younger residents, it would not be fair to impose additional impacts on the Anaheim Hills community. He concluded that Albert was a 19-year-old young man with a future ahead of him and emphasized the emotional impact of the loss on his family, particularly during the holiday season.

Ruben Greg Soto shared concerns regarding vehicle impoundment and treatment by police officers and referenced communications with federal authorities. He requested assistance and support.

Pearl Arzola expressed opposition to the proposed Festival project, citing wildfire risks and concerns for resident safety. She stated that additional housing should be developed in other areas of the city rather than in a high fire hazard area. She shared alleged harassment by police officers and negative interactions with community members. She criticized approval of the project in exchange for financial contributions and urged the Council to vote against the project.

Lizzette Diaz expressed condolences to the family of Albert Arzola and encouraged the family and community to seek peace and support through faith. She shared her personal experience with housing challenges and restarting life as a single parent. She requested assistance with housing opportunities in Anaheim. She expressed a desire to remain in the Anaheim community, continue educational goals, and contribute through music and community involvement.

Mayor Aitken referred Ms. Diaz to Director of Housing and Community Development Grace Ruiz-Stepter for additional assistance.

Lupe Lopez addressed the Council regarding community concerns related to the Festival project and the death of Albert Arzola in an officer-involved incident. She urged the Council to consider residents’ concerns regarding public safety, quality of life, and accountability, and referenced community calls for justice and transparency in connection with the ongoing investigation. She encouraged community members to remain civilly engaged, participate in elections, and monitor campaign funding and Council actions related to policing and development issues.

City Council Minutes of March 3, 2026

Art Castillo expressed opposition to the Festival project, noting concerns regarding wildfire evacuation and evacuation safety for elderly or medically vulnerable residents to safely leave the area during an emergency. He shared that a family friend considered relocating due to safety concerns. He urged Council Members to listen to the public’s concerns. He alleged retaliation, intimidation, and misconduct by police officers in certain neighborhoods. He referenced previous interactions residents and families have had with the Anaheim Police Department.

Mazatl Tepehyolotzin expressed opposition to the Festival project and support for community members raising concerns about environmental impacts, public safety, and preservation of the area for future generations. He referenced Native American heritage and ancestral history connected to the land and discussed concerns regarding discrimination, injustice, and treatment of marginalized communities. He shared the death of his cousin in Mexico, expressing concerns regarding violence and policing. He called for greater recognition of historical and community issues affecting local residents.

Bryan Kaye expressed concerns over the City’s coyote trapping policy and potential violations. He referenced community concerns regarding wildfire safety and the death of Albert Arzola, stating that residents have attended meetings to provide information intended to help the Council make informed decisions on public safety matters. He shared a desire to meet with the Council to work toward solutions for community concerns.

COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS:

Council Member Maahs shared that she read to students at James Guinn Elementary School and Sunkist Elementary School for Read Across America Week. She highlighted the Anaheim Elementary School District for its thoughtful work in bringing community guests to build strong readers. She thanked the educators for their work and the Anaheim Police Department for joining the event.

Council Member Maahs announced that on Thursday, March 19th, she would be co-hosting the screening of Join or Die with the Sierra Club at 5:30 p.m. She shared that the film explores how civic participation and community involvement shape the strength of neighborhoods and democracy. She noted that service clubs would be present to share their work and provide information on opportunities for involvement.

Mayor Aitken shared her participation during Read Across America Week, reading to students at James Guinn Elementary School. She highlighted their bilingual program and the students. Mayor Aitken reported her attendance at the California State University, Fullerton (CSUF) Vision & Visionaries Awards, which fundraises and honors CSUF alumni for their work in the community. She expressed her appreciation to the Orange County Business Council for inviting her to lead the Pledge of Allegiance at their event. She noted that the program recognized both small and large businesses throughout Orange County and shared that Girl Scout cookies were provided as an exit gift. Mayor Aitken shared that over 800 individuals submitted drawings for the Anaheim Public Utilities Annual Water Conservation poster contest. She thanked Public Utilities General Manager Dukku Lee and the Public Utilities team. She shared that the selected artwork would be displayed at City Hall and the Anaheim West Tower. She added that the students attended an Anaheim Ducks game. Mayor Aitken presented a video from NBC4 highlighting the Anaheim Union High School District’s free laundry program, in partnership with Superior Laundry. She highlighted the program's partnership with small businesses for Anaheim youth. She requested to recognize the owners of Superior Laundry and the District’s Superintendent for their contribution to the community. She requested to explore options for the City to assist with the program.

Council Member Rubalcava thanked the public in attendance who participated during public comments. She shared that the City Council recognizes their concerns and encouraged the public to City Council Minutes of March 3, 2026

stay for the duration of the meeting to engage with the City Council. She noted that the Council’s opportunity to address the public would be under Council Communications and not during the public comment period. Council Member Rubalcava highlighted Anaheim resident, Orange Lutheran High School student, and wrestling Masters Champion, Alexa Smith. She requested a recognition for Alexa for her efforts and achievements. Council Member Rubalcava shared that she participated in Read Across America Week at Vibrant Minds Charter School. She recognized the schools, teachers, and students who participated in the event. She highlighted the Anaheim Public Utilities Annual Water Conservation poster contest for promoting engagement among Anaheim youth on water-wise initiatives. She shared that of the sixteen students recognized, one student resided in District 3. She thanked Public Utilities General Manager Dukku Lee and his team for their work and efforts on the program. Council Member Rubalcava shared that she is working on initiatives aimed at engaging Anaheim youth and steering them away from criminal activity. She encouraged residents to report graffiti and other concerns through Anaheim Anytime, noting that the Public Works Department responds within 24 hours. She shared that any gang-related graffiti incidents are reported to the Anaheim Police Department. Council Member Rubalcava stated that her office is working with City staff and local artist Carla Roche to recognize the life of Mia Leah Mejia. She emphasized that bullying and youth suicide are issues impacting families in the City and beyond. She stressed the importance of ensuring that youth have access to resources. She shared that a kindness mural would be painted in Mia’s memory and highlight suicide awareness resources for everyone. She noted that her office hosts a suicide awareness event in September during Suicide Awareness Month. She highlighted the Community Services Department and Carla Roche for their assistance with the initiative.

Mayor Pro Tem Leon reported his attendance at the Loara Little League home opener. He thanked the parents for their work coordinating the league. He shared his participation during Read Across America Week. Mayor Pro Tem Leon highlighted the Orange County Transportation Authority Board and staff for their work on the 241-91 Freeway connector. He highlighted the project’s recent approval by Caltrans. He shared that the connector has been a critical missing piece between the two freeways. He shared that the project required years of coordination, environmental review, and advocacy. Mayor Pro Tem Leon recognized the Savanna High School Girls Basketball Team for winning the CIF Championship. He shared that he looks forward to bringing the team in for a Council recognition.

CITY MANAGER’S UPDATE: None
Without objection, Mayor Aitken took the meeting out of order to consider Public Hearing Item No. 10.

PUBLIC HEARING:

10. DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION NO. 2023-00043
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (FEIR) NO. 358 AND
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM NO. 397

GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
AMENDMENT NO. 6 TO FESTIVAL SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 90-1 WITH ZONING CODE AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 18.108
(FESTIVAL SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 90-1 (SP 90-1)

ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS) OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE

FINAL SITE PLAN
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2025-00001
OWNER: OTR, an Ohio General Partnership, One California Street, Suite 2700, San Francisco, CA 94111
City Council Minutes of March 3, 2026

APPLICANT: Sean McEachern, Shea Properties Management Company, Inc., 130 Vantis Drive, Suite 200, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656
PROJECT LOCATION: The project site consists of the entirety of the existing 85.7-acre Anaheim Hills Festival Specific Plan, generally located south of Santa Ana Canyon Road between Festival Drive and Roosevelt Road, in the City of Anaheim.

REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of a General Plan Amendment; Amendment No. 6 to Specific Plan No. 90-1, to amend the Specific Plan document and Chapter 18.108 (Festival Specific Plan No. 90-1 (SP 90-1) Zoning and Development Standards) of the Anaheim Municipal Code; Final Site Plan; and a Development Agreement to establish a new Development Area (DA 5) within the existing boundaries of the Anaheim Hills Festival Specific Plan to accommodate residential uses in combination with the site’s existing commercial development. DA 5 would be created by reallocating land from the existing DA 2, reducing its size from approximately 48 acres to 31.8 acres. The resulting 16.2-acre area would form the new DA 5. All proposed development would be confined to DA 5, which encompasses Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs) 354-451-19 and 354-451-32. The proposed project includes the demolition of an approximately 62,676-square foot cinema within DA 5 to construct a 447-unit multiple-family residential community. The proposed multiple-family community would consist of a four-story residential building, wrapped around a five-level parking structure with one subterranean level. All residential units are single-story and include one-bedroom, two-bedroom, and three-bedroom options with private balconies or patios.

Project amenities include a clubhouse, two swimming pools, courtyards, a fitness center, and mail area. In addition to the project’s private amenities, the applicant is proposing an enclosed outdoor dog park along Festival Drive and bluff park along the north edge of the newly proposed DA 5, which would be open to the residents of the community and the general public. The applicant requests the General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan Amendment to allow for the proposed residential uses and the creation of DA 5. The General Plan Amendment would change the land use designation within DA 5 from Regional Commercial to Mixed-Use Medium. The Mixed-Use Medium land use designation allows for residential development in either a stand-alone or mixed-use configuration at a density of up to 36 dwelling units per acre, and the non-residential development at a maximum floor area ratio of

0.35. The Specific Plan Amendment would amend the Specific Plan No. 90-1 document to allow for the mixed-use land uses on a total of 16.2 acres (DA 5) and includes other text and exhibit amendments related to signage, permitted uses, design guidelines, and development standards. The Specific Plan Amendment would also amend Anaheim Municipal Code Chapter 18.108 (Festival Specific Plan No. 90-1 (SP 90-1) Zoning and Development Standards), to incorporate the proposed residential standards into DA 5 and other clarifying changes related to signage, permitted uses, and development standards.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City Council will consider certification of Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) No. 358, including the adoption of Findings of Fact, Statement of Overriding Considerations, and Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) No. 397, and determine that FEIR No. 358 was prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and FEIR No. 358 and MMP No. 397 are adequate to serve as the appropriate environmental documentation for the project, and no further environmental documentation needs to be prepared for the project.

ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION:

Approved Resolution No. PC2025-033 recommending the City Council certify a Final Environmental Impact Report No. 358, adopt findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations, and adopt Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 397 for the Anaheim Hills Festival Project and related actions; Resolution No. PC2025-034 recommending the City Council approve and adopt a proposed General Plan Land Use Element Amendment; Resolution No. PC2025-035 recommending that the City Council approve a Final Site Plan for City Council Minutes of March 3, 2026

the construction of 447 multiple-family units and make certain findings in connection therewith, as amended to add Condition of Approval No. 43 and renumber the Conditions of Approval to reflect the change; and Resolution No. PC2025-036 recommending City Council approve and adopt Development Agreement No. 2025-00001 by and between the City of Anaheim, and OTR, an Ohio Partnership.

VOTE: 6-1 (Chairperson Walker and Commissioners Abdulrahman, Castro, Lieberman, Perez, and Tran-Martin voted yes; Commissioner Kelly voted no) (Planning Commission meeting of November 17, 2025)
[Continued from the Council meetings of December 16, 2025 (Public Hearing Item No. 20); January 13, 2026 (Public Hearing Item No. 16); and February 3, 2026 (Public Hearing Item No. 10)]
Public Hearing closed at the Council meeting of January 13, 2026.

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-015 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM (a) certifying Final Environmental Impact Report No. 358, (b) adopting findings of fact and a statement of overriding considerations in connection therewith, and (c) adopting Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 397 for the Anaheim Hills Festival Project and required and related discretionary actions (DEV2023-00043).

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-016 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM amending the General Plan Land Use Element of the City of Anaheim (DEV2023-00043).

ORDINANCE NO. 6622 (INTRODUCTION) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM approving and adopting amendments to the Anaheim Hills Festival Specific Plan No. 90-1 (SP 90-1) and Chapter 18.108 (Festival Specific Plan No. 90-1 (SP 90-1) Zoning and Development Standards) of Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code and amending Ordinance Nos. 5109 and 5110, as previously amended (Amendment No. 6 to the Festival Specific Plan) (DEV2023-00043).

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-017 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM approving a Final Site Plan for the construction of 447 multiple-family units and make certain findings in connection therewith (DEV2023-00043).

ORDINANCE NO. 6623 (INTRODUCTION) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM approving and adopting Development Agreement No. 2025-00001 by and between the City of Anaheim and OTR, an Ohio partnership, and making certain findings related thereto (DEV2023-00043).

Mayor Aitken repeated her announcement during public comments that the City Council would not be reopening the public hearing for comments. She added that the public had the opportunity, during public comments, to provide comments to be included for the record.

Planning and Building Director Heather Allen reported that the Planning Commission, at its November 17th meeting, recommended City Council approval of the Project. She stated that on January 13, the City Council commenced the public hearing on the project, completing public comments, initiating discussion, and ultimately continuing action on the item to provide an opportunity for the applicant to continue discussions with union labor and for staff to follow up on questions raised by Council Members in their discussion.

City Council Minutes of March 3, 2026

Director Allen reported that the project includes demolition of a vacant movie theater building and the construction of 447 multiple-family units within the upper tier of the Festival Shopping Center, also called Development Area 5 (or DA5). She stated that the project requires a General Plan amendment, Specific Plan amendment, including amendments to the Zoning Code, Final Site Plan, and certification of an Environmental Impact Report. She added that the applicant also requests to enter into a Development Agreement with the City. She noted that a full analysis of the project was presented at the January 13th public hearing and no changes or technical studies have been made since the item was presented.

Director Allen reported that she would address questions raised by the City Council at the January 13th meeting. She shared that with respect to residential development potential of Development Area 5, the proposed Specific Plan document includes several references to the unit count in Development Area 5 as 447 units. She explained that for that reason, any future redevelopment or changes to increase the residential unit counts would require a Specific Plan Amendment and additional environmental analysis. She reported that in response to questions regarding future additional residential development in Development Area 5, staff recommends that General Plan Figure LU-5 and Table LU-4 be amended to further clarify that the maximum allowed dwelling units in DA 5 is 447 units. She stated that Figure LU-5 and Table LU-4 include density restrictions for specific areas throughout the City. She reported that with the recommended changes, if a future developer proposes additional residential units in DA 5 or any other area of the Festival Specific Plan, a Specific Plan Amendment and General Plan Amendment would be required along with additional environmental analysis. She added that the staff-recommended changes to the Land Use Element were included in the resolution approving the General Plan Amendment, the agenda material, and confirmed the proposed development intensity for DA 5.

Director Allen reported that regarding development impact fees, the Draft Development Agreement includes Exhibit D, which establishes the Development Impact Fees that the proposed project would be subject to. She added that the applicant would be responsible for paying these impact fees at the time of building permit issuance, at the rate that is adopted at that time. She shared that the City does not currently have Citywide Police and Fire Impact Fees, and the project would not be subject to the Platinum Triangle Impact Fees, as these fees are specific to the facility needs in the Platinum Triangle area of the City. She reported that the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance applies to residential development projects filed on or after October 8, 2024. She explained that because the application was submitted in August 2023, the project is not subject to the requirement to provide affordable units or alternative options, including payment of in-lieu fees. She added that the project does include 45 moderate-income affordable units.

Director Allen reported that California State law requires that the City’s Housing Element include an inventory of land suitable and available for residential development, including vacant sites and sites with realistic potential for redevelopment within the Housing Element cycle to meet the local housing needs, as set by the Regional Housing Needs Assessment, or RHNA, allocation process. She stated that the inventory, also referred to as the Adequate Sites Analysis, identifies sites with submitted development applications, known as “Pipeline Projects,” as well as sites that permit the development of housing under current regulations or require a regulatory update to zoning and land use designation to permit housing, the latter two collectively known as “Candidate Sites.” She noted that the subject project site was included as a Pipeline Project site, as the City had an active development application submitted for residential development within the Festival shopping center at the time of the Housing Element update. She added that the Candidate Sites in District 6 account for 20% of the Citywide unit total.

City Council Minutes of March 3, 2026

Director Allen stated that each year, the City is required to report to the State on Housing Element implementation, including progress made toward meeting the housing production goals of RHNA.

She reported that as of the most recent annual report, covering up to December 2024, the City has permitted 2,406 units of the 17,453 units allocated during this cycle, which began in 2021. She noted that more updated numbers would be presented to the City Council at the following meeting. She reported that the Draft Development Agreement for this project includes an initial term of five years, with the ability to extend for an additional five-year term if the Developer has obtained building permit issuance before October 1, 2029. She explained that the timing is designated to incentivize the Development such that if approved, the project would assist the City towards meeting the current RHNA requirements by producing 447 units, including 45 moderate-income units.

Director Allen reported that while the majority of Anaheim was developed in the early to mid-20th century, Anaheim Hills was primarily developed in the 1970s and 80s. She explained that to facilitate a cohesive development of Anaheim Hills, a variety of Specific Plans were approved during that time.

She stated that through the development of the Specific Plan areas and data available from the Center for Demographic Research, it is estimated that a total of 7,300 units have been built in Anaheim Hills since 1980. She reported that the majority of production of new housing projects in the last 25 years was largely located in the central area of the City in Districts 3, 4, and 5.

Director Allen shared that while the City can encourage the developer to do so, the City cannot require a developer to use union labor as part of the Development Agreement negotiations. She noted that the applicant confirmed on February 26th that they have entered into a formal MOU with the Western States Regional Carpenters Union relating to the project. She added that the City Municipal Code has specific disclosure requirements for qualifying projects to identify their contractors and subcontractors prior to building permit issuance and at any time between permit issuance and final inspection, if any change occurs. She added that the information is a public record and provides the public, including union labor groups, the opportunity to review the contractors and subcontractors associated with qualifying projects. She stated that failure to comply with the provisions of the Code would be considered a violation and can result in the suspension or revocation of building permits by the Building Official. She noted that the disclosure requirements would apply to the project, if approved.

Director Allen reported that staff believe that the proposed project is compatible with the surrounding area and would provide for the redevelopment of an underutilized area of the Festival shopping center. She explained that the project would allow for the introduction of residential uses in the Festival center and would provide new design guidelines that would encourage high-quality commercial improvements to the rest of the Specific Plan area. She added that impacts, with the exception of VMT-related impacts, were determined to be less than significant with the incorporation of measures included in the project MMP. She stated that the project includes a variety of public benefits and would assist the City in meeting the required RHNA housing units. She reported that the comments received yesterday from the Chatten-Brown Law Group have been reviewed and included as part of the record, along with other public comments received. She explained that the commenter does not identify any significant new information that was not adequately disclosed in the EIR. She added that the commenter does not identify any new significant impacts or any substantial increases in impacts beyond those identified/disclosed in the EIR. She concluded that staff continues to recommend Council approval of the project.

DISCUSSION: In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Fire Chief Patrick Russell stated that the Deer Canyon and Festival projects were evaluated independently based on specific characteristics and impacts. He noted that the Deer Canyon project differed significantly from the Festival Project City Council Minutes of March 3, 2026

because it was a larger and more complex development involving the creation of an entirely new community, whereas the Festival project involved the redevelopment of an existing developed site.

Council Member Rubalcava asked what types of improvements or investments the City could make to help address and mitigate wildfire safety and evacuation concerns raised by Anaheim Hills residents.

Chief Russell highlighted the current investments in wildfire mitigation in the area. He did identify improvements in the weed abatement program. He explained the need to transition into in-house services to allow for flexibility year-round without relying on contract crews funded through grants. He noted that the crews belong to the State and can be pulled at any time. He highlighted mitigation efforts using goats but with limitations.

In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Chief Russell reported that staff are exploring available grant opportunities and researching programs to support wildfire mitigation efforts. He estimated startup costs for a potential program ranging from $1.5 million to $2 million, primarily for equipment and implementation, with ongoing costs for personnel. He explained that the program could be structured like the ambulance operator program. He added that labor could be hired from the community and be trained to do weed abatement and respond as a Type 2 crew. He added that the program could also provide workforce training opportunities and a pathway into a firefighter position at the City. He stated that there would be ongoing costs apart from the implementation costs. He added that there may be grants available to offset costs.

Council Member Rubalcava encouraged Chief Russell to include the costs in the proposed budget.

She requested additional information on whether the proposed hand crew program could eventually become self-sustaining over time, similar to the City’s ambulance program.

Chief Russell reported that, based on preliminary research and discussions with other agencies, including Los Angeles, Chula Vista, and Corona, the proposed hand crew program could potentially become close to cost-neutral over time. He explained that reimbursement opportunities could be available when crews are deployed to assist with fires, similar to existing fire engine reimbursement practices, including administrative fees. He noted that maintaining part-time personnel for ongoing weed abatement and vegetation management throughout the city could support the program’s sustainability. He reported that grant opportunities are being researched, including conservation and coastal grants, which could help offset costs. He emphasized that weed abatement along evacuation routes and in other critical areas citywide would be a significant benefit of the program.

Council Member Rubalcava reported that her nephew serves as a firefighter in Los Angeles County and responded to the Eaton Fire, speaking positively about the effectiveness of hand crews, particularly Anaheim’s. She stated that expanding the program could help address ongoing wildfire concerns raised by residents. She asked staff and the Fire Marshal to explain the process used by the Fire Department when reviewing development projects for fire safety and determining whether to recommend approval.

Fire Marshal Lindsey Young explained that Fire Department staff participate in the development review process alongside the City’s development review team. She stated that the proposed projects are evaluated throughout the review process, with opportunities to ask questions and identify concerns as additional project details become available. She noted that some projects enter the process at a conceptual stage, while others are more fully developed. She reported that the Department reviews projects for compliance with California Fire and Building codes, including CalGreen requirements. She added that the developer is notified of any issues early in the process to address mitigation measures prior to plan approval.

City Council Minutes of March 3, 2026

In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Fire Marshal Young stated that the Know Your Way evacuation program was developed following the Canyon 2 Fire as part of the City’s after-action review process. She noted that after every major incident, the City evaluates its response efforts to identify areas for improvement, including evacuation procedures and public communication. She reported that the program was created to establish a coordinated framework for communication among residents, emergency responders, and partner agencies during emergencies such as wildfires, earthquakes, or landslides. She emphasized that the program is intended to provide a consistent foundation for emergency response and evacuation planning. She added that the City continues to refine and improve the program, particularly through public outreach and communication. She noted that the program would continue to evolve regardless of the outcome of the proposed project under consideration.

Council Member Rubalcava stated that several public speakers stated they were previously unaware of the Know Your Way evacuation initiative, but expressed appreciation that the discussion surrounding the project had increased public awareness of the program. She shared that City staff would be receptive to feedback aimed at improving the program and recognized Council Member Meeks for her efforts to raise awareness since taking office. She requested additional information on Fire Marshal Young’s experience with the City and expertise related to evaluating fire safety concerns associated with the project.

Fire Marshal Young shared that she is a 20-year veteran of the fire service and a product of the fire service. She stated that her father retired from the Fire Department and carried on in his footsteps.

She explained that public safety and serving the community and her fellow fire family are central to her professional commitment. She shared that she originally began in an MBA program before transitioning into the fire service. She noted that she possesses numerous certifications, qualifications, and educational credentials related to fire service and emergency management, which meet and exceed the requirements of her role.

In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Chief Russell shared that he has 40 years of experience in the fire service, 36 in the City of Anaheim. He shared that for 25 years, he has served on a federal Type 1 Incident Management Team, progressing from Division Supervisor to Incident Commander.

He noted that he has responded to major fires throughout California and across the United States including assignments in Nevada, Arizona, Oregon, and Washington, typically serving on three to five wildfire incidents annually. He shared that he has held leadership roles during significant incidents, including serving as Operations Chief during the Thomas Fire and Canyon 2 Fire, as well as Incident Commander for several fires in Orange County. He added that he is the Incident Commander on a local Type 3 County incident management team. He reported that he started with the State through the wildland system and highlighted his passion for the fire service.

In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Chief Russell highlighted several wildfire preparedness improvements implemented since the Canyon 2 Fire. He stated that the City’s dispatch command center now monitors 42 wildland cameras, including 12 located in Anaheim, providing enhanced early detection and situational awareness for vegetation fires. He noted that firefighters and command personnel can remotely monitor cameras during incidents to improve response coordination. He also described expanded mutual aid and wildfire response agreements with agencies including CAL FIRE, the U.S. Forest Service, and Orange County Fire Authority. He noted that the City annually funds a Wildland Protection Agreement with CAL FIRE, providing immediate access to aircraft, hand crews, bulldozers, and engines during wildfire incidents. He reported that additional improvements include enhanced intelligence and forecasting coordination through South Ops for red flag and wind-driven fire events, allowing pre-positioning of personnel and equipment in advance of high-risk conditions.

City Council Minutes of March 3, 2026

He added that the Know Your Way evacuation program remains an important component of the City’s ongoing wildfire preparedness efforts. He concluded that while continued improvements are still needed, the City has made significant progress in wildfire preparedness and response capabilities since the Freeway and Canyon 2 fires.

Council Member Rubalcava thanked both Chief Russell and Fire Marshal Young for their service and dedication to the City.

Mayor Aitken requested clarification on the startup costs for a weed abatement program.

Chief Russell estimated that establishing a City hand crew program for weed abatement and wildfire response would require approximately $1.5 to $2 million in startup costs, primarily for equipment and transport vehicles. He added that the program would support vegetation management, evacuation route maintenance, and emergency wildfire response capabilities. He estimated annual ongoing costs with salaries and benefits at $1,000,000.

In response to Council Member Meeks, Chief Russell reported that since the Canyon 2 Fire, Anaheim has significantly expanded its wildfire response capabilities by doubling brush fire response resources, including additional brush engines, patrols, water tenders, and reserve structure engines.

He explained that during Red Flag conditions, the department increases staffing with additional fire units and a battalion chief dedicated to wildfire response. He added that the City also deploys state- owned OES “green engines” staffed by Anaheim personnel and works with state agencies for pre- positioned strike teams during high fire risk events. He noted that four new fire engines are expected to enter service soon, and additional equipment is planned next year. He shared that the fire company at Station 10 would be moved to Station 12. He noted that 12 of the firefighters beginning the Fire Academy were approved by the Council with the intent to keep the additional fire company at Station 10. He confirmed that Station 10 would remain staffed with 2 fire companies and an engine would not be leaving the Canyon area.

Council Member Meeks noted that the City created a full-time staff member for weed abatement, property inspections, and ensuring compliance with fire safety standards. She requested additional information on the program.

Chief Russell stated that with the Council’s support, the City hired a full-time wildland inspector dedicated to wildfire prevention efforts. He reported that the responsibilities include coordinating with homeowners associations, conducting home hardening inspections for residents, managing goat grazing and brush clearance programs, working with the Community Conservation Corps, and identifying areas in the canyons where wildfire mitigation and vegetation management improvements are needed. He noted that the position has been highly beneficial to the City’s wildfire preparedness efforts.

Council Member Meeks praised the City’s wildfire mitigation efforts, noting improved vegetation management and fewer overgrown areas in Anaheim Hills. She also raised questions regarding residents' concerns about water supply and firefighting capacity.

Chief Russell explained that he was not aware of any significant water supply issues during the Canyon 2 Fire and emphasized that Anaheim’s water system is well-equipped for wildfire response.

He explained that the City can boost water pressure through its grid system during major incidents and noted that nearby heli-hydrant infrastructure in Yorba Linda, along with the Walnut Canyon Reservoir and Orange County helicopter water-dropping operations, provide strong firefighting water support capabilities for Anaheim Hills.

City Council Minutes of March 3, 2026

In response to Council Member Balius, Chief Russell acknowledged that predicting specific wildfire evacuation scenarios and traffic impacts is difficult because emergency conditions and project variables can vary significantly. He stated that evacuation and emergency response plans must remain flexible and adaptable to changing conditions. He emphasized that the City’s responsibility is to minimize risk, protect the public, and evacuate residents safely regardless of the final project decision. He noted that while Know Your Way has not been tested in a real emergency, the City maintains emergency plans for many high-risk, low-frequency events and remains prepared to adjust operations as needed during an incident. He added that evacuation efforts would remain the same if the project was a new development.

In response to Council Member Maahs, Chief Russell confirmed that no lives were lost in the Canyon 2 fire.

Council Member Maahs expressed disagreement with claims that the City’s response for the Canyon 2 fire was a complete failure. She shared her personal familiarity with Anaheim Hills and emphasized that her approach to evaluating the Festival project was based on facts, research, conversations with staff and residents, and public safety considerations rather than emotion. She requested additional information on how embers travel.

Chief Russell explained that during extreme Santa Ana wind conditions, embers from a wildfire can travel approximately a half mile to one mile, depending on wind speed and conditions. He noted that wildfire spread also depends on whether embers land in “receptive fuel beds,” such as combustible roofs, dry vegetation, or debris, versus noncombustible areas like irrigated landscaping. He stated that fire behavior and ignition probability are analyzed using weather conditions, fuel conditions, and computer modeling to assess wildfire risk.

In response to Council Member Maahs, Chief Russell explained that the fire in Lahaina involved significantly heavier fuel loads, combustible older structures, narrow roadways, and limited evacuation options due to the island's geography. He noted that emergency response resources in Lahaina were difficult to deploy because equipment and aircraft had to be transported to the island.

He emphasized that new construction built under current fire codes in Lahaina did not burn. He reported that the Palisades fire occurred during extreme Santa Ana wind conditions, with rapid fire spread and structure-to-structure ignition once homes became involved. He added that many streets in the affected area were narrow, limiting opportunities to create fire breaks and complicating evacuation efforts. He added that many residents had to evacuate through the advancing fire front, where Anaheim Hills evacuation routes are designed to move residents away from approaching fire danger. He acknowledged there are some similarities between Anaheim Hills and other wildfire-prone areas, but emphasized there are also important differences in road configurations, evacuation planning, and emergency response capabilities.

In response to Council Member Maahs, Chief Russell stated that questions regarding increasing evacuation capacity would be better addressed by Public Works or traffic experts.

Council Member Maahs thanked Chief Russell and expressed appreciation for his leadership and service to the City.

Council Member Kurtz requested additional information on mitigation measures to address homes or neighborhoods that may create fire risks.

City Council Minutes of March 3, 2026

Chief Russell explained that the City’s wildfire mitigation efforts are both proactive and complaint- driven. He shared that the Fire Department’s full-time wildfire inspector identifies hazardous conditions such as overgrown vegetation, combustible landscaping, wood piles, or accumulated debris near homes. He added that if hazards are identified, staff contacts the property owner to provide education, recommendations, and assistance with fuel reduction and fire prevention measures.

Council Member Kurtz inquired about any programs that would assist residents who are unable to address the risks in their homes.

Chief Russell stated that wildfire risks are evaluated on a case-by-case basis and that the City would work to assist residents who may lack the resources to address fire safety concerns on their property.

He explained that wildfire response tactics have evolved significantly in recent years, particularly during wind-driven fire events. He added that the Fire Department deploys tactical patrols, assigning strike teams to remain within neighborhoods to continuously monitor spot fires, inspect properties, and respond quickly to ember ignitions. He noted that the strategy has become a standard practice in wildfire response over the past decade to help reduce home loss and fire spread.

Council Member Kurtz thanked Chief Russell and the Fire Department for their service.

Mayor Pro Tem Leon thanked residents for their public comments. He requested additional information on whether the project included specific building design features intended to reduce wildfire risk and prevent the development itself from becoming a source of ignition that could spread fire to surrounding homes.

Fire Marshal Young reported that the proposed project, located in a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, would be required to comply with the latest California Fire Code and Cal WUI Code standards, effective January 1st. She stated that the project would include enhanced fire-resistant construction features intended to reduce ember intrusion, radiant heat exposure, and direct flame contact. She explained that requirements include fire sprinklers, Class A roofing, ember-resistant venting, dual- pane tempered glass, noncombustible exterior materials, ignition-resistant decking, and expanded fuel modification zones with irrigated landscaping and restricted plant species. She added that a fuel modification plan would be reviewed and approved by the City, with ongoing maintenance responsibilities assigned to the homeowners' association.

In response to Mayor Pro Tem Leon, Fire Marshal Young clarified that while some fire safety measures, such as fire sprinklers, would be required for the project regardless of location, most of the enhanced fire protection requirements discussed were specific to developments located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone. She noted that the additional requirements would generally not apply if the project were located elsewhere, unless required for another specific reason.

Mayor Pro Tem Leon inquired if a vacant, unmaintained structure would pose a higher fire risk to neighboring homes compared to a newly-built fire code-compliant residential building.

Fire Marshal Young explained that the risk would depend on maintenance and external factors.

In response to Mayor Pro Tem Leon, Fire Marshal Youn reported that landscaping within the project’s fuel modification zones would be subject to strict review and approval requirements. She noted that palm trees would not be permitted near the structures and that all proposed trees and landscaping would be evaluated through the landscape plan review process. She stated that the first 20 feet around structures would be required to be irrigated, while areas extending out to 200 feet would be City Council Minutes of March 3, 2026

subject to limitations on shrub groupings, tree heights, and canopy spacing. She added that the approved fuel modification landscaping would be required to be maintained in perpetuity unless replaced with another approved plan.

Mayor Pro Tem Leon requested additional information on the notification and evacuation staging plan for residents of the proposed project.

Fire Marshal Young noted that the developer had been asked to include an early warning notification component for future residents of the project. She explained that the goal was to ensure residents are automatically enrolled in emergency alert systems, such as Anaheim emergency notification programs, so they receive timely and frequent communication during emergencies. She added that some existing residents have expressed a lack of awareness about available alert systems, and the project presents an opportunity to improve resident engagement in wildfire preparedness and emergency notifications.

Mayor Pro Tem Leon suggested exploring additional outreach efforts through the Public Utilities Department to increase public awareness of emergency preparedness resources, regardless of the Council’s decision on the project.

Council Member Meeks clarified previous comments regarding infrastructure and traffic conditions in Anaheim Hills. She stated that prior remarks about infrastructure being “adequate” referred specifically to accommodating local traffic, while acknowledging that existing gridlock issues are primarily caused by cut-through traffic and require additional solutions. She added that during an evacuation event, incoming traffic to the area would be restricted to help facilitate resident evacuation and improve traffic flow out of the area. She requested a brief overview of the traffic modeling for evacuations, status, and areas to address.

Traffic Engineer Rafael Cobian explained that the area has sufficient roadway capacity, but successful evacuation would depend on effective traffic management during emergencies. He stated that emergency evacuation plans include restricting incoming traffic and utilizing all available roadway space, including both directions of Santa Ana Canyon Road and roadway shoulders to maximize outbound traffic flow. He added that the capacity management approach is a key component of the City’s Know Your Way plan and is intended to support both resident evacuation and emergency responder access during wildfire events.

In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Traffic Engineer Cobian stated that key findings from the Canyon 2 fire included the need for improved coordination with neighboring agencies, noting that evacuation activity from nearby jurisdictions contributed to congestion in Anaheim Hills during the fire.

He reported that in response, the City developed stronger communication and coordination protocols with regional agencies through the Emergency Operations Center. He explained that the City created Know Your Way to divide Anaheim Hills into evacuation zones, allowing for more controlled and phased evacuations instead of evacuating large areas simultaneously. He noted that staff identified unnecessary inbound traffic during emergencies as a major issue and emphasized the importance of restricting nonessential traffic during evacuations. He stated that part of the evacuation plan, inbound traffic would be restricted during a wildfire or emergency event. He added that traffic would be stopped at key points including Imperial Highway, Santa Ana Canyon Road, and freeway access points, in order to preserve roadway capacity for evacuating residents. He noted that limiting incoming traffic would help improve traffic flow for residents leaving the area.

Council Member Rubalcava requested additional information on Traffic Engineer Cobian’s experience.

City Council Minutes of March 3, 2026

Traffic Engineer Cobian shared that he holds a civil engineering degree and has worked in traffic engineering for 18 years. He added that he is a licensed professional engineer in California. He noted that he has worked for the City for over 11 years and participated in the Emergency Operations Center during both Canyon Fire 1 and Canyon Fire 2. He explained that he is among the first personnel called during a wildfire emergency to coordinate evacuation and traffic management efforts alongside Fire, Police, and emergency management staff. He emphasized familiarity with Anaheim traffic conditions, roadway operations, and evacuation coordination, stating his technical expertise and local experience inform the City’s emergency response planning.

In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Traffic Engineer Cobian explained that it is a multidisciplinary approach when evaluating evacuation and emergency planning studies related to development projects. He stated that Public Works Traffic Engineering leads the review process because the analysis is data-driven and similar to traffic impact studies conducted for new developments. He emphasized that the evaluation also involves collaboration with Anaheim Fire & Rescue, the Anaheim Police Department, emergency management personnel, and Planning staff to ensure consistency with CEQA requirements. He noted that all departments review the studies collectively and evaluate projects holistically from traffic, public safety, emergency response, and planning perspectives before determining the study outcomes.

Mayor Aitken requested additional information on the number of housing units built from 1980 to the present. Director Allen confirmed that 7,300 units were built in District 6.

In response to Mayor Aitken, Director Allen explained that the City does not have complete historical demographic and development data for all districts dating back to the 1980s. She stated that reliable data from the Center for Demographic Research is available beginning in 2000, which allowed the City to analyze trends across all six districts over the past 25 years. She noted that staff attempted to reconstruct earlier data using census tract information but faced limitations because portions of Anaheim Hills were developed through specific plans. She added that generally, the majority of the City was developed earlier than Anaheim Hills. She confirmed that the property is currently zoned for commercial use with zero residential units.

Mayor Aitken thanked staff for addressing questions regarding emergency alerts, fire staffing, and evacuation planning, noting that she had been evaluating the project for several months. She acknowledged several positive aspects of the proposal, including the addition of needed housing, publicly accessible park space maintained by the developer, and commitments intended to ensure quality construction; however, the benefits did not sufficiently address public safety concerns. She expressed concern that wildfire evacuation and mitigation efforts rely heavily on measures such as vegetation management, goats for brush clearance, a wildfire inspector, and the untested Know Your Way evacuation plan. She questioned whether the City has adequate resources, staffing, and long- term funding to sustain wildfire mitigation efforts at the scale needed. She noted that many residents and non-resident commuters may be unfamiliar with evacuation procedures, creating additional challenges during emergencies. She acknowledged ongoing efforts to improve wildfire preparedness, and she stated that wildfires remain a significant and real threat in Anaheim Hills and that increasing traffic congestion could further complicate evacuation efforts. She emphasized that wildfire behavior can exploit vulnerabilities that are difficult to predict or control and concluded that sufficient safeguards are currently in place to support moving forward with the project.

In response to Council Member Kurtz, Director Allen explained that if City Council denied the project, the existing zoning and General Plan designations would remain in effect. She stated that the current building could either remain or be reused, or the site could be redeveloped with commercial uses permitted under the existing zoning and specific plan. She added that future commercial development City Council Minutes of March 3, 2026

could include businesses and activities that would continue to generate customer traffic and related impacts similar to those associated with a commercial center.

Council Member Kurtz inquired if developers could develop other housing options for low-income or very low-income.

Director Allen responded that residential development on the site would require an applicant to submit requests under the same process, to include changes to the zoning designation and General Plan. She noted that State housing laws continue to evolve and, depending on future legal provisions, certain residential projects may be eligible to proceed through alternative processes that could bypass some traditional local approval requirements. She explained that under current conditions, a residential project would typically require the appropriate zoning and General Plan amendments unless it qualified for a specific state law exemption or streamlined approval process.

In response to Council Member Kurtz, Director Allen explained that eligibility for streamlined residential development under State law depends on specific project criteria and site conditions. She noted that State housing laws are continually evolving and that some provisions can facilitate mixed- income or affordable housing projects. She emphasized that many of the State laws reviewed by the City generally exclude sites located within Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones.

Council Member Rubalcava inquired about the square mileage in Anaheim Hills for density purposes.

Director Allen noted that any comparison involving District 6 could be skewed because a significant portion of the district consists of undeveloped land.

In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Director Allen confirmed that zoning designations from commercial to residential have become common.

Council Member Rubalcava inquired if State law allows the City to deny a project based on parking or traffic concerns.

Director Allen explained that the City’s ability to deny a housing project based on parking or traffic concerns depends on the type of project and applicable State housing laws. She noted that State law significantly limits local discretion for certain qualifying affordable housing developments, including establishing State-defined parking standards that such projects may utilize. She clarified that the project under consideration did not qualify under those affordable housing provisions because it consisted of moderate-income housing. She explained that qualifying housing projects may only be denied based on objective standards and that the applicability of those standards varies depending on the specific project and relevant State law requirements.

In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Director Allen stated that over the past 25 years, 2,843 units have been developed in District 3. She reported that it is the third highest, following Districts 4 and 5.

Council Member Rubalcava acknowledged concerns raised by residents regarding parking and traffic impacts associated with higher-density development in existing neighborhoods. She stated that the City must balance its responsibility to meet State housing requirements with maintaining and enhancing residents’ quality of life throughout Anaheim. She emphasized the importance of ensuring that housing growth is thoughtfully planned so residents can live comfortably in all parts of the City.

She asked whether a fire emergency could occur in densely populated neighborhoods with limited access points.

City Council Minutes of March 3, 2026

Director Allen responded that the Fire Chief would be best positioned to address questions about evacuation access in densely populated areas, but noted that fire risks exist in both wildland-urban interface areas and more densely developed urban environments.

Council Member Rubalcava acknowledged residents’ concerns regarding wildfire risk and noted that fires can occur in both older urban neighborhoods and wildland-adjacent communities. She expressed confidence in City leadership, the Fire Chief, and staff who recommended approval of the project. She distinguished the proposed project from the Deer Canyon project because City staff, including the Fire Chief and Police Chief, had recommended denial due to public safety and other concerns. She explained that the current proposal would be an infill project and stated support for adding multifamily housing opportunities in Anaheim Hills as part of distributing housing development more evenly throughout the City. She also noted that, unlike the current project, the Planning Commission had recommended approval of the Deer Canyon project despite staff concerns.

Director Allen confirmed that the staff recommendation for the Deer Canyon project was denial; however, the Planning Commission did recommend approval.

Council Member Rubalcava stated that she voted to deny approval of the Deer Canyon project based on public testimony and staff concerns. She noted that the Deer Canyon project was a significantly denser development and was not an appropriate project for Anaheim Hills. She emphasized that the Festival project is substantially different in scale and character and acknowledged the work of City staff, including the Fire Department and Public Works, in evaluating public safety and traffic issues, She expressed support for the project, stating that Anaheim must accommodate future housing growth throughout the City rather than concentrating development in other districts. She shared that she would be supporting the project.

Council Member Maahs thanked City staff and emphasized her vote is not a reflection of a lack of trust in their expertise or recommendation. She stated that her decision is guided by a commitment to public safety, which she described as a fundamental responsibility of government. She acknowledged the importance of increasing housing opportunities, but that development must occur responsibly, and concluded that they could not support the project if it contributed to the already three-hour evacuation time.

Mayor Pro Tem Leon thanked residents for attending community meetings, open houses, and Council meetings, and acknowledged the value of community engagement and dialogue. He provided an update on the 241-91 connector project, and that work is continuing on the Fairmont connector.

He reported that preliminary internal analysis for the Fairmont connector has been completed and that OCTA staff are preparing to review the results with the cities of Anaheim and Yorba Linda. He thanked residents who have supported the initiatives and encouraged public participation as the projects move through future review and approval.

Council Member Kurtz stated that the project has been under consideration for several months and acknowledged concerns raised about public safety. She emphasized a longstanding belief that all Anaheim neighborhoods should receive equal consideration, resources, and protection regardless of location. She shared that some neighborhoods in District 4 face their own emergency access challenges, including limited ingress and egress and parking constraints that can impede emergency vehicle access. She argued that safety concerns are not unique to Anaheim Hills. She stated that she could not justify applying a different standard of safety to one area of the city than to another and concluded that all residents deserve the same level of attention and investment. She shared that she would support the project.

City Council Minutes of March 3, 2026

MOTION: Council Member Rubalcava moved to approve RESOLUTION NO. 2026-015 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM (a) certifying Final Environmental Impact Report No. 358, (b) adopting findings of fact and a statement of overriding considerations in connection therewith, and (c) adopting Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 397 for the Anaheim Hills Festival Project and required and related discretionary actions (DEV2023-00043), RESOLUTION NO. 2026-016 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM amending the General Plan Land Use Element of the City of Anaheim (DEV2023-00043), introduce ORDINANCE NO. 6622 (INTRODUCTION) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM approving and adopting amendments to the Anaheim Hills Festival Specific Plan No. 90-1 (SP 90-1) and Chapter 18.108 (Festival Specific Plan No. 90-1 (SP 90-1) Zoning and Development Standards) of Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code and amending Ordinance Nos. 5109 and 5110, as previously amended (Amendment No. 6 to the Festival Specific Plan) (DEV2023-00043), approve RESOLUTION NO. 2026-017 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM approving a Final Site Plan for the construction of 447 multiple-family units and make certain findings in connection therewith (DEV2023-00043), and introduce ORDINANCE NO. 6623 (INTRODUCTION) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM approving and adopting Development Agreement No. 2025- 00001 by and between the City of Anaheim and OTR, an Ohio partnership, and making certain findings related thereto (DEV2023-00043), seconded by Council Member Kurtz.

DISCUSSION: Mayor Aitken emphasized that all Council Members share a responsibility to represent and serve the entire City of Anaheim, not just their individual districts. She acknowledged the importance of prioritizing resident safety and reflected on past development decisions where community concerns influenced outcomes. She expressed concern that district-based representation can sometimes create division rather than collaboration and encouraged the Council to focus on developing Citywide solutions rather than shifting challenges from one neighborhood to another. She stated that all residents deserve equal consideration and that the City should work collectively to improve conditions across every neighborhood.

MOTION: Council Member Rubalcava moved to approve RESOLUTION NO. 2026-015 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM (a) certifying Final Environmental Impact Report No. 358, (b) adopting findings of fact and a statement of overriding considerations in connection therewith, and (c) adopting Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 397 for the Anaheim Hills Festival Project and required and related discretionary actions (DEV2023-00043), RESOLUTION NO. 2026-016 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM amending the General Plan Land Use Element of the City of Anaheim (DEV2023-00043), introduce ORDINANCE NO. 6622 (INTRODUCTION) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM approving and adopting amendments to the Anaheim Hills Festival Specific Plan No. 90-1 (SP 90-1) and Chapter 18.108 (Festival Specific Plan No. 90-1 (SP 90-1) Zoning and Development Standards) of Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code and amending Ordinance Nos. 5109 and 5110, as previously amended (Amendment No. 6 to the Festival Specific Plan) (DEV2023-00043), approve RESOLUTION NO. 2026-017 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM approving a Final Site Plan for the construction of 447 multiple-family units and make certain findings in connection therewith (DEV2023-00043), and introduce ORDINANCE NO. 6623 (INTRODUCTION) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM approving and adopting Development Agreement No. 2025- 00001 by and between the City of Anaheim and OTR, an Ohio partnership, and making certain findings related thereto (DEV2023-00043), seconded by Council Member Kurtz. ROLL CALL VOTE:

AYES – 4 (Mayor Pro Tem Leon and Council Members Balius, Rubalcava, and Kurtz); NOES – 3 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Maahs and Meeks). Motion carried. Ordinances introduced.

City Council Minutes of March 3, 2026

Council Member Meeks shared that her vote reflected the views and concerns of constituents. She expressed confidence in the City’s evacuation planning efforts. She acknowledged that the project review process highlighted areas where emergency preparedness and evacuation procedures could be improved and committed to continuing work on those issues. She thanked residents for their participation throughout the process, including submitting comments, emails, and attending meetings, and noted that the public engagement helped identify opportunities for improvement. She encouraged continued community involvement to strengthen evacuation planning and support ongoing public safety enhancements.

CONSENT CALENDAR: At 9:56 p.m., the Consent Calendar was considered with Mayor Aitken pulling Item No. 2, Council Member Rubalcava pulling Item Nos. 4 and 6, and Council Member Balius pulling Item No. 3 for separate consideration.

MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Leon moved to waive reading of the ordinances and resolution and adopt the balance of the consent calendar as presented, in accordance with reports, certifications, and recommendations furnished each City Council Member, seconded by Council Member Meeks. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES – 7 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Leon, Balius, Rubalcava, Kurtz, Maahs, and Meeks); NOES – 0. Motion carried.

1. Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Gehl Studio, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $298,800, to conduct the Anaheim Resort 2.0 Urban Design and Mobility Visioning Initiative, for a term ending March 3, 2027 with two one-year optional renewals; and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement and take the necessary actions to implement and administer the agreement.

5. RESOLUTION NO. 2026-019 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ratifying the submission of a grant application and the acceptance of a grant on behalf of the City of Anaheim for the Fiscal Year 2025 Tobacco Grant Program, authorizing the Police Chief, or their designee, to execute all required grant documents, and increasing the budget for the Fiscal Year 2025-26 accordingly (grant award in the amount of $554,556).

7. ORDINANCE NO. 6621 (ADOPTION) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM approving and adopting amendments to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (SP 92-2) and Chapter 18.116 (Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (SP 92-2) Zoning and Development Standards) of Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code (Amendment No. 18 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan) (DEV2024-00058; introduced at the Council meeting of February 24, 2026 Public Hearing Item No. 21).

8. Approve minutes of the Council meeting of December 16, 2025.

BUSINESS CALENDAR:

2. Approve a Lease with Orange County Flood Control District, in the amount of $215,000 per year not including CPI, for a total estimated amount of $6,700,000 for the initial term inclusive City Council Minutes of March 3, 2026

of CPI, for use of a 44.18-acre flood basin parcel located within Dad Miller Golf Course, located at 430 N. Gilbert Street, for an initial term of 25 years with five five-year optional renewals; and authorize the Community Services Director, or designee, to execute and administer the Lease and future renewals on behalf of the City.

Director of Community Services Sjany Larson-Cash reported that the item is for approval of a lease agreement with the Orange County Flood Control District for use of approximately 44 acres of flood basin land owned by the County and located within the Dad Miller Golf Course. She stated that Dad Miller Golf Course sits on 103.54 acres, with 44.18 owned by the County of Orange which serves as a retarding basin for the Carbon Creek for flood control purposes. She reported that nine holes of the course are situated on the County parcel. She explained that the original agreement governing use of the County property was executed in 1959 for a 25-year term, and modified in 1977 for an additional 25 years. She reported that the agreement allowed for recreational use of the land in exchange for maintenance of the site. She shared that from 2002 to 2007, the City and County entered into Memoranda of Understanding for the use of the property. She noted that the agreements continued on a month-to-month basis, subject to cancellation at any time by the City or County.

Director Larson-Cash reported that in December 2024, the County notified the City of its desire to formalize a long-term lease agreement with rent payments to align with other County-owned property.

She stated that the agreement establishes an initial 25-year term with five additional five-year extension options, for an annual rent amount o $215,000 beginning in 2031 with rent to be adjusted annually based on the Consumer Price Index, with increases capped at 2.5% per year.

DISCUSSION: In response to Mayor Aitken, Director Larson-Cash confirmed that during the term of the initial agreement and subsequent renewals, the rental amount was $1.

Mayor Aitken requested clarification regarding the transfer of the property from the Orange County Flood District was from a government agency to another government agency. She inquired about the usage of the Dad Miller Golf Course and whether the course is used primarily by Anaheim residents.

Director Larson-Cash reported that 24% of the tee times are utilized by Anaheim residents. She added that 68% of those who use the Senior Play Pass are Anaheim residents. She confirmed the rental amount would increase from $1 to $215,000 per year. She clarified that the rent would be paid from Golf Enterprise Funds and not the General Fund.

Mayor Aitken noted that under the original agreement, the City leased the site for $1, with the maintenance of the property, pumping water back into the flood control system as required, and providing staffing and oversight to ensure the area remained safe and free of debris and other hazards.

Director Larson-Cash confirmed that the original lease agreement included City responsibility to maintain the property in exchange for maintaining the site on behalf of the County.

In response to Mayor Aitken, Director Larson-Cash confirmed that the City would continue to be responsible for maintaining the property, paying utility costs, and would assume additional responsibilities for cleaning portions of the Carbon Creek Channel, including removal of debris and trash that may enter from the golf course or accumulate after storms. She confirmed that the City would not receive reimbursement from the Orange County Flood Control District or the County for the added maintenance obligations.

City Council Minutes of March 3, 2026

Mayor Aitken expressed concern that the proposed agreement would require the City to assume additional maintenance and operational responsibilities without reimbursement from the Orange County Flood Control District or the County. She noted that the property is largely undevelopable, subject to periodic flooding, and already generates maintenance costs for the City. She added that a small percentage of the golf course users are Anaheim residents. She added that any future fee increases could proportionately affect residents of neighboring communities who use the facility. She suggested that the Orange County Board of Supervisors should have an opportunity to review and evaluate the proposal and its impacts on their constituents before the City takes final action. She acknowledged staff’s efforts on the agreement and reservations about absorbing additional costs and responsibilities before the County weighed in.

Council Member Meeks expressed concerns regarding the City’s assumption of additional maintenance responsibilities under the proposed agreement and questioned whether those obligations were reflected in the property's valuation. She inquired whether the appraisal accounted for the property's limited development potential due to its location within a flood zone and whether the ongoing maintenance and operational responsibilities were considered in determining the land's value and the negotiated lease terms.

Director Larson-Cash explained that the negotiated lease terms remained below market value based on the City's independent appraisal and analysis conducted during negotiations. She added that the maintenance costs were not included in the valuation.

In response to Council Member Meeks, Director Larson-Cash reported that preliminary estimates indicate the proposed lease costs would likely result in an approximately $5 increase in green fees for nonresident golfers. She added that the fees would be evaluated in five years due to annual rent adjustments tied to CPI. She added that beginning in 2031, rental costs are expected to increase further, and the City will need to periodically assess whether additional adjustments to green fees are necessary to offset those rising expenses.

Council Member Meeks noted that the information was important for the Board of Supervisors to consider as the proposal moves forward.

Council Member Balius inquired whether the City informed the County that the proposed lease terms could require increases in nonresident golf course fees to cover the additional costs and if the District responded to those concerns.

Director Larson-Cash reported that the District acknowledged that concern but maintained that it intended to proceed with the agreement in order to bring the golf course lease into alignment with other golf course properties under its ownership that are subject to similar rental charges.

Council Member Balius shared his support of the agreement but expressed concern on the City’s reliance on leased recreational and open-space properties. He noted that the City leases other recreational facilities as well and suggested that the City should explore opportunities to acquire such properties rather than remain a long-term tenant.

Director Larson-Cash noted that the City had inquired about purchasing the property; however, the County expressed the intention to keep the property.

Mayor Aitken added that the Orange County Flood Control District was acting under the direction of County leadership during negotiations. She explained that she reached out to members of the Board of Supervisors and expressed concern that the proposed fee increases would primarily affect City Council Minutes of March 3, 2026

nonresident golfers from surrounding communities. She preferred that the Board of Supervisors review the item before Council approval. She inquired whether the City could acquire the land.

Interim City Manager Greg Garcia stated that the City had repeatedly inquired over the past several years to acquire the property. He explained that County staff explained that it is their policy not to sell parcels used for flood control overflow purposes to local jurisdictions. She added that the City sought additional clarification regarding that policy and requested supporting information, but those requests were denied.

In response to Mayor Pro Tem Leon, Director Larson-Cash reported that the County could terminate the ongoing month-to-month agreement if the City does not move forward with the proposed agreement.

Mayor Pro Tem Leon inquired if the County Board of Supervisors could consider the item before the City Council.

Mayor Aitken suggested postponing the item until the Orange County Board of Supervisors had an opportunity to review, discuss, and formally approve the proposal. She expressed concern that the County Board of Supervisors was not closely involved in the negotiations despite the agreement’s potential impact on nonresident golfers throughout North Orange County. She stated that because the property is public land used primarily for flood control purposes and is otherwise undevelopable, there should be consideration given to reduced costs between public agencies. She expressed additional concern that increased lease costs would ultimately result in higher green fees, particularly affecting seniors and recreational users from surrounding communities.

Mayor Pro Tem Leon requested additional information on the City’s responsibilities and if there are any changes due to the proposed agreement.

Director Larson-Cash clarified that maintenance responsibilities only apply to a specific section of the Carbon Creek Channel. She explained that the area can accumulate debris after storms, including items such as mattresses, chairs, and other trash, as well as debris originating from the golf course.

She noted that the area could occasionally experience issues related to encampments. She reported that under the proposed agreement, the City would be responsible for monitoring and cleaning the area, removing debris and trash, identifying potential encampments, and coordinating efforts to address and clear those issues as needed.

In response to Mayor Pro Tem Leon, Director Larson-Cash clarified that the City currently conducts minor weed abatement and trash pickup. She added that the County is requesting additional cleanup services.

In response to Mayor Aitken, Director Larson-Cash confirmed that the City would be paying more rent and performing additional maintenance.

In response to Council Member Kurtz, Director Larson-Cash reported that Dad Miller Golf Course currently accommodates approximately 95,000 rounds of golf annually during periods of high demand. She explained that after accounting for Anaheim residents, senior programs, tournaments, and high school use, the City conducted a conservative estimate and determined that an approximately $5 increase in fees for nonresident golfers would likely be sufficient during the initial years to offset the increased lease-related costs.

City Council Minutes of March 3, 2026

In response to Council Member Kurtz, Director Larson-Cash reported that the increase did not include additional costs for maintenance.

Council Member Kurtz stated increases would be necessary to offset the increased costs.

Council Member Balius expressed his support for sending the item back to the Board of Supervisors.

He inquired whether that would produce a different result.

Director Larson-Cash noted that the matter involved negotiations and differing positions between agency staff. She stated that it was difficult to foresee a substantially different outcome under the circumstances.

Interim City Manager Garcia added that negotiations had been conducted with the County real estate office acting on behalf of the Orange County Flood Control District. He noted that while the possibility of increasing nonresident green fees had been discussed as a way to offset the new lease costs, no guarantee had been made that such fee increases would occur. He added that based on the discussion among Council, it appeared likely that the Council would direct staff to explore adjustments to nonresident green fees to address the anticipated reduction in golf course revenues associated with the proposed lease agreement. He noted that the potential impact on golf uses may be an important consideration for the Board of Supervisors, who may approach the matter differently.

Mayor Aitken requested additional information on the costs for maintenance of the flood control area, to consider offsetting the rental costs.

Interim City Manager Garcia explained that the existing agreement has long operated under the understanding that the City would maintain and clean portions of the channel area located primarily within the golf course property. He stated that the intent of the new agreement was to clearly define those responsibilities moving forward. He acknowledged Council concerns regarding the possibility of increased maintenance and lease costs and stated that staff could return with additional analysis regarding any projected cost increases associated with the revised lease terms. He recognized that any green fee increases would need to be taken into consideration and additional costs to the lease.

Council Member Balius inquired whether additional negotiations or mitigation measures with the County could place the City at risk of losing the existing lease agreement for the golf course property.

He noted that, unlike some other properties, the golf course could potentially attract interest from other entities and questioned whether another organization could seek to assume the lease if the City delayed or attempted to renegotiate the terms.

Director Larson-Cash stated that they did not believe the City was currently in danger of losing the existing lease agreement. She acknowledged that the County could potentially enter into an agreement with another recreational or athletic organization in the future, provided the proposed use remained consistent with the property’s required open-space and flood control functions.

In response to Council Member Meeks, Director Larson-Cash stated that the County is tentatively looking to present the item around April.

MOTION: Council Member Meeks moved to continue the item.

DISCUSSION: City Attorney Fabela clarified that the continuance could be to a date uncertain.

City Council Minutes of March 3, 2026

Council Member Balius shared that the item could be delayed until the next Council meeting in two weeks to allow time for discussions with the Orange County Board of Supervisors and County staff.

Mayor Aitken inquired whether staff would have sufficient time before the next meeting to coordinate with Public Works and other departments to compile information for costs associated with maintaining and cleaning the flood control channel area, working with the Homeless Task Force for encampment cleanup, and revenue lost when the front nine holes are closed.

Director Larson-Cash stated that staff would have sufficient time to gather the requested information; however, she could not guarantee a response by the County within that time.

Mayor Aitken suggested continuing the item to an uncertain.

Interim City Manager supported the continuance to a date uncertain to provide time for the County Board of Supervisors to have further discussions.

MOTION: Council Member Meeks moved to continue the item to a date uncertain, seconded by Council Member Maahs.

DISCUSSION: In response to Mayor Pro Tem Leon, Director Larson-Cash stated that the City conducted an independent analysis to evaluate the proposed rental rate for the property after learning that the County was not interested in selling the land. She reported that the study included comparisons to similar properties and lease agreements. She shared that staff concluded that the rental rate proposed by the County was below market value.

Mayor Pro Tem Leon asked staff to clarify the method to determine the proposed lease rate.

Director Larson-Cash clarified that staff contacted consultant Steve White to provide an analysis of other facilities, including both golf course and non-golf course recreational or open-space facilities owned by counties and other public agencies. She shared that the analysis considered open-space use, acreage, and annual rental costs in order to develop a comparable price-per-acre metric and allow for comparison of the proposed lease rate.

In response to Mayor Pro Tem Leon, Director Larson-Cash explained that the City sought to maximize the length of the agreement during negotiations, which led to the inclusion of multiple five- year extension options in the proposed lease.

Mayor Pro Tem Leon confirmed that the motion would be to continue the item to a date uncertain and direct staff to engage with the Orange County Board of Supervisors.

City Attorney Fabela advised that the motion should be to postpone indefinitely to follow the City’s Rules of Order.

MOTION: Council Member Meeks moved to postpone indefinitely, seconded by Council Member Maahs. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES – 7 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Leon, Balius, Rubalcava, Kurtz, Maahs, and Meeks); NOES – 0. Motion carried.

City Council Minutes of March 3, 2026

3. Approve the Subdivision Agreement of Parcel Map No. 2020-178 with Zelman 39 Commons Partners, LLC, for the subdivision of property to construct a new retail shopping center, located at 208 N. Beach Blvd.

Director of Public Works Rudy Emami reported that the item for consideration is a Subdivision Agreement with Zelman 39 Commons Partners, LLC for Parcel Map No. 2021-78 for the property located at 208 N. Beach Boulevard. He stated that the agreement would subdivide the property at the northeast corner of Beach Boulevard and Lincoln Avenue to allow construction of a new retail shopping center. He explained that the project would subdivide the existing parcel into five parcels, including four buildable parcels for one multi-tenant retail building and three separate drive-through restaurants. He added that there would be one non-buildable parcel that would provide primary access to Beach Boulevard. He reported that the Planning Commission approved the Tentative Tract Map in May 2022. He stated that as required by the Subdivision Map Act and the project’s condition of approval, the developer must dedicate right-of-way and construct public improvements along the project frontage. He added that the improvements would include the reconstruction of sidewalk and installation of parkway landscaping along Beach Boulevard and Lincoln Avenue. He reported that the developer would complete the improvements at their sole cost. He concluded that there were no impacts to the City’s budget and all conditions required prior to the parcel approval had been met.

DISCUSSION: In response to Council Member Balius, Director Emami explained that the timing for Council consideration following approval of the Tract Map is dependent on the developer’s schedule.

Council Member Balius shared that Parcel No. 4 would include the construction of an In-N-Out, Parcel No. 3 would include a Dave’s Hot Chicken, and Parcel No. 1 would include a Dutch Bros Coffee. He expressed gratitude to the developer for submitting the Parcel Map for approval.

MOTION: Council Member Balius moved to approve the Subdivision Agreement of Parcel Map No. 2020-178 with Zelman 39 Commons Partners, LLC, for the subdivision of property to construct a new retail shopping center, located at 208 N. Beach Blvd., seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Leon. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES – 7 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Leon, Balius, Rubalcava, Kurtz, Maahs, and Meeks); NOES – 0. Motion carried.

4. RESOLUTION NO. 2026-018 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA, declaring public purpose and approve a Purchase and Sale Agreement (PSA), in substantial form, with the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), to acquire property adjacent to 1251 West Lincoln Avenue (Caltrans Parcel No. DK 001153-01-01) for public purposes for an amount not to exceed $1,726,000.00, based upon a final Caltrans appraisal; authorize the Director of Public Works to execute the Purchase and Sale Agreement with Caltrans; and authorize the Director of Public Works, or designee, to take all actions necessary or advisable to implement and administer the PSA [includes determination that the action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) because the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects that have the potential to cause a significant impact on the environment].

Amend the Fiscal Year 2025/26 Anaheim Fire & Rescue budget in an amount equal to the final purchase price.

Director Emami reported that the Purchase and Sale Agreement with Caltrans would be to acquire property adjacent to 1251 W. Lincoln Avenue for the future development of Fire Station 13. He noted that the action supports the City’s Strategic Plan goal to strengthen public safety services. He stated City Council Minutes of March 3, 2026

that the City currently owns a .68-acre remnant parcel at the location, with the remaining .81-acre parcel owned by Caltrans. He shared that acquiring the parcel would allow the City to assemble a sufficient-sized site to construct Fire Station 13 and improve emergency response coverage in Central Anaheim. He reported that Caltrans obtained an appraisal establishing the value of the site at $1,726,000. He added that the City commissioned an independent MAI-certified appraisal to confirm the fair market value and requested a reduction. He reported that Caltrans has revised the appraisal to $1,389,000, a reduction of $337,000. He noted that the final agreement would reflect the revised value. He shared that there was a critical timeline for the action due to Caltrans’s need to submit the transaction to the California Transportation Commission by March 18th for consideration at their June meeting. He added that approval would allow staff to proceed without delay. He stated that Anaheim Fire & Rescue’s budget would be amended by the amount of the final purchase price. He concluded that the acquisition is anticipated to be funded through Development Impact Fees.

DISCUSSION: Council Member Rubalcava thanked staff for their work. She inquired about the original requested purchase amount.

Director Emami reported that the original amount was $1,700,000.

In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Director Emami reported that an independent appraisal identified concerns with the valuation methodology used in the Caltrans appraisal. He stated that after reviewing the supporting information provided by the City, Caltrans reduced the valuation, though not to the full extent requested.

Council Member Rubalcava expressed appreciation for the efforts of City staff, Caltrans, and Assembly Member Valencia’s office in resolving the property matter, noting that the process took approximately 20 months. She highlighted the shared ownership of the parcel and stated that the proposed fire station would enhance service to Districts 1, 2, and 3 in the growing, densely populated area.

Director Emami noted that the area on the Interstate 5 freeway experiences frequent accidents.

Council Member Rubalcava noted that alternative properties were evaluated but determined that the proposed site was the most suitable location for the project. She highlighted the high volume of fire and emergency service calls Citywide and within District 3, emphasizing the need for enhanced fire protection services in the area. She expressed appreciation for staff and partners involved in the acquisition.

MOTION: Council Member Rubalcava moved to approve RESOLUTION NO. 2026-018 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA, declaring public purpose and approve a Purchase and Sale Agreement (PSA), in substantial form, with the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), to acquire property adjacent to 1251 West Lincoln Avenue (Caltrans Parcel No. DK 001153-01-01) for public purposes for an amount not to exceed $1,389,000, based upon a final Caltrans appraisal; authorize the Director of Public Works to execute the Purchase and Sale Agreement with Caltrans; and authorize the Director of Public Works, or designee, to take all actions necessary or advisable to implement and administer the PSA [includes determination that the action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) because the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects that have the potential to cause a significant impact on the environment] and amend the Fiscal Year 2025/26 Anaheim Fire & Rescue budget in an amount equal to the final purchase price, as amended, seconded by Council Member Kurtz.

City Council Minutes of March 3, 2026

DISCUSSION: Council Member Balius requested additional information on the project funding through Development Impact Fees.

Interim City Manager Greg Garcia clarified that, following approval of the item and execution of the final Purchase and Sale Agreement, the Fire Department budget would be amended in the near term to complete the property acquisition without further delay. He explained that the Development Impact Fees applied to the construction of the new station.

In response to Council Member Balius, Interim City Manager Garcia explained that some Development Impact Fees would contribute to the purchase of the land. He added that construction would rely on future Development Impact Fees.

Council Member Balius requested clarification that sufficient Development Impact Fee funds were available for the land acquisition and that future fees collected would apply to the construction of the new station.

Interim City Manager Garcia stated that he would follow up regarding the sufficiency of existing Development Impact Fees to cover the purchase of the land.

Council Member Balius expressed his support for moving forward with the item, if needed, using funds from the General Fund. He emphasized the importance of understanding how Development Impact Fees could be utilized to support future fire station construction costs. Interim City Manager Garcia confirmed that staff would follow up with the information.

City Attorney Robert Fabela requested clarification on the authorization for the purchase amount.

Director Emami clarified that the City Council could proceed with the revised amount of $1,389,000.

Council Member Kurtz expressed support for the property acquisition and thanked staff for their efforts in securing the site, noting its central location and anticipated benefits in improving emergency response times for multiple districts and surrounding neighborhoods. She requested clarification on the availability of Development Impact Fees for the purchase and whether future construction of the fire station would be funded through development impact fees.

Interim City Manager Garcia stated that the Development Impact Fees are the preferred funding source for the construction. He shared that, given the project’s priority, staff could explore other funding opportunities.

Council Member Kurtz thanked staff for confirming future funding opportunities for the project.

Director Emami clarified that if funds are used from the General Fund, they would be repaid by future Development Impact Fees collected. He added that the timing to acquire the property was driving the transaction, with funding opportunities coming later.

Mayor Pro Tem Leon expressed appreciation for staff’s work on the item. He shared his support for the item, noting resident concerns over fire response times, particularly in District 2. He stated that the project represents an important next step in addressing those concerns.

MOTION: Council Member Rubalcava moved to approve RESOLUTION NO. 2026-018 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA, declaring public purpose and approve a Purchase and Sale Agreement (PSA), in substantial form, with the California City Council Minutes of March 3, 2026

Department of Transportation (Caltrans), to acquire property adjacent to 1251 West Lincoln Avenue (Caltrans Parcel No. DK 001153-01-01) for public purposes for an amount not to exceed $1,389,000, based upon a final Caltrans appraisal; authorize the Director of Public Works to execute the Purchase and Sale Agreement with Caltrans; and authorize the Director of Public Works, or designee, to take all actions necessary or advisable to implement and administer the PSA [includes determination that the action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) because the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects that have the potential to cause a significant impact on the environment] and amend the Fiscal Year 2025/26 Anaheim Fire & Rescue budget in an amount equal to the final purchase price, as amended, seconded by Council Member Kurtz. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES – 7 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Leon, Balius, Rubalcava, Kurtz, Maahs, and Meeks); NOES – 0. Motion carried.

6. RESOLUTION NO. 2026-020 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM approving a Labor Management Workers' Compensation Alternative Dispute Resolution Agreement between the Anaheim Firefighters Association, Local 2899 and the City of Anaheim and rescinding Resolution No. 2018-020.

Authorize the Human Resources Director to execute the agreement and to take the actions necessary to implement and administer the agreement.

DISCUSSION: Council Member Rubalcava expressed support for the item and noting areas for improvement for efficiency. She suggested exploring similar programs for other departments, including Public Utilities. She thanked Human Resources Director Linda Andal for providing a memo to Council on workers' compensation and shared potential future requests for information.

MOTION: Council Member Rubalcava moved to approve RESOLUTION NO. 2026-020 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM approving a Labor Management Workers' Compensation Alternative Dispute Resolution Agreement between the Anaheim Firefighters Association, Local 2899 and the City of Anaheim and rescinding Resolution No. 2018-020 and authorize the Human Resources Director to execute the agreement and to take the actions necessary to implement and administer the agreement, seconded by Council Member Meeks.

ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES – 7 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Leon, Balius, Rubalcava, Kurtz, Maahs, and Meeks); NOES – 0. Motion carried.

9. Discuss staffing and safety requirements for self-checkout stations at grocery and drug retail establishments in the City of Anaheim, and provide direction to staff.

Interim City Manager Garcia reported that staff prepared background information on the item in preparation for Council discussion. He stated that staff evaluated policies from neighboring jurisdictions.

Deputy City Manager Ted White reported that the discussion would cover potential regulation of staffing and safety standards at grocery stores and retail drug stores that operate with self-checkout stations, as requested by Council Member Kurtz and Mayor Aitken. He stated that over the past several years, grocery stores, big-box retailers, and retail drug stores have expanded the use of self- checkout technologies. He explained that due to the rise in the use of technologies, there have been concerns about public safety and appropriate staffing levels at the stores. He reported that in response, some local jurisdictions have adopted regulations to address those concerns.

City Council Minutes of March 3, 2026

Deputy City Manager White reported that the City of Long Beach was the first in the nation to adopt an ordinance effective in September 2025, followed by Costa Mesa effective in April 2026. He stated that Senator Smallwood Cuevas proposed Senate Bill 442 at the State level, which included similar provisions; however, the bill was currently a two-year bill. He added that the frameworks adopted by Long Beach, Costa Mesa, and SB 442 share similar key provisions with minor differences. He explained that they all establish thresholds for the types and size of business establishments that are subject to the regulations, including grocery stores over 15,000 square feet, super stores over 75,000 or 80,000 square feet, with more than 10% of the floor area devoted to food, and all retail stores regardless of size. He stated that SB 442 would apply to drug store chains that operate 75 or more locations in the State. He reported that based on those standards, approximately 26 stores in Anaheim would be affected if a similar ordinance is adopted. He added that all three frameworks establish minimum staffing levels, with Long Beach and Costa Mesa requiring one employee per three self-checkout stations and one manned station to be available whenever self-checkout is open.

He reported that SB 442 does not include a staffing ratio and would require one dedicated employee.

He stated that all three frameworks limit self-checkout transactions to 15 items and prohibit the purchase of items requiring identification or stored in locked cabinets.

Deputy City Manager White shared that the three frameworks share similar attributes regarding enforcement and implementation. He noted that the City of Long Beach does not include a cure period compared to the City of Costa Mesa and a 30-day implementation period. He added that the City of Costa Mesa’s policy includes a 15-day written notice cure period before litigation can proceed, and allows for a 60-day implementation period. He reported that both ordinances carry penalties ranging from $100 to $1,000 per employee, per day, per store, with attorney fees recoverable. He added that SB 442 includes penalties up to $1,000 per day, with an aggregate cap of $200,000 including attorney’s fees. He noted that City Council received three comments on the item, one from the California Grocers Association and two from grocery operators with stores in Anaheim. He explained that all three letters expressed interest in meeting with Council to provide input and perspective prior to moving forward with any ordinance.

DISCUSSION: Council Member Kurtz shared that she has visited local supermarkets and stores where fewer or no cashiers are available due to self-checkout. She noted challenges faced by seniors, families, and other shoppers who may struggle with the self-checkout technology and a reduction in cashier assistance at those lanes. She expressed concern over the pressure placed on retail employees, including managing self-checkout areas, addressing customer frustrations, and responding to retail theft issues. She suggested exploring whether the City should consider policies to support both shoppers and grocery store employees and emphasized that the item was intended as an initial discussion to gauge Council interest before conducting outreach to grocers and industry representatives for further input.

Mayor Aitken expressed support for further discussion on self-checkout regulations, sharing concerns about access to essential goods and services for seniors and other residents, as well as the impacts on retail workers. She noted that employees often face customer frustration when self-checkout systems malfunction and emphasized the need for greater protection for workers who must manage multiple checkout areas and customer service demands. She addressed expectations to manage retail theft, explaining that there is heightened security available at the stores.

Council Member Meeks acknowledged the increasing use of technology and self-service systems in everyday transactions. She expressed concern that local regulations could place Anaheim businesses at a competitive disadvantage compared to neighboring jurisdictions. She shared her preference for broader action at the State or County level to ensure a consistent approach and maintain a level playing field for businesses and consumers.

City Council Minutes of March 3, 2026

Council Member Rubalcava requested additional information on enforcement mechanisms.

Deputy City Manager White explained that enforcement would primarily rely on private enforcement mechanisms, including a right-to-cure process, and would not be expected to create a significant Code Enforcement burden for the City. He noted that enforcement actions could be initiated by employees or members of the public through the legal system.

Council Member Rubalcava requested clarification on contact information for the public and how complaints would be received.

City Attorney Fabela explained that no ordinance had been proposed at that time and that enforcement details would be subject to future discussion. He shared that based on similar ordinances in other cities, enforcement is generally handled through a private process in which a member of the public may report a violation, the business is provided an opportunity to cure the issue, and, if not corrected, may be subject to a private legal action.

In response to Council Member Rubalcava, City Attorney Fabela stated that Council can include enforcement measures in a proposed ordinance. He mentioned that other ordinances use private enforcement measures with complaints directly received by the stores.

Council Member Rubalcava questioned how a proposed ordinance would be enforced, expressing concern about adopting a City ordinance without City oversight or enforcement mechanism.

City Attorney Fabela explained that the Council can propose oversight and enforcement mechanisms.

He shared that if the City references other models, enforcement and oversight would be privately managed.

Council Member Rubalcava expressed support for exploring an enforcement and reporting component as part of any future ordinance, stating that residents and employees should have a way to notify the City of potential violations. She emphasized the importance of ensuring that any adopted policy is effectively implemented and monitored rather than relying solely on private complaints or labor grievances.

Mayor Aitken inquired whether the City has similar ordinances that rely on private enforcement and asked whether a requirement could be included for parties filing enforcement actions to provide notice to the City so that it remains informed about potential violations.

City Attorney Fabela stated that a requirement for City notification could be incorporated into a potential ordinance by requiring parties pursuing a private right of action to provide simultaneous notice to the City. He noted that the provision would add an administrative step for litigants but could be included if directed by the Council.

Council Member Maahs expressed support for grocery store workers and interest in exploring the proposed policy but also voiced concerns about potential impacts on businesses and economic development. She shared her preference for a Statewide approach to ensure consistency across jurisdictions and avoid placing local businesses at a competitive disadvantage.

Council Member Balius thanked Council Member Kurtz for initiating the discussion and gauging Council interest before directing significant staff resources toward the issue. He expressed support for workers and employment opportunities at all wage levels and acknowledged concerns regarding safety, theft, and staffing at self-checkout stations. He shared a preference for businesses and City Council Minutes of March 3, 2026

market forces to address these issues rather than adopting local regulations that mandate minimum staffing requirements.

Council Member Kurtz added that two-year bills at the State level generally do not move forward, noting some bills are often delayed rather than formally rejected and may ultimately not move forward.

Mayor Pro Tem Leon expressed support for continued discussion regarding self-checkout practices.

He emphasized the importance of ensuring safe, welcoming, and accessible retail environments for both customers and employees and noted that the increasing use of self-checkout raises important questions about worker safety, customer experience, and the City's role in addressing those concerns. He reiterated his support for exploring policy options and looked forward to further discussion aimed at protecting workers and residents while ensuring an effective and balanced approach.

Council Member Meeks requested additional data and information on the safety issues.

Mayor Aitken agreed that future discussions should be informed by data and noted anecdotal concerns regarding the sale of age-restricted products and potential retail loss associated with self- checkout systems. She acknowledged the difficulty of obtaining such information and emphasized the importance of relying on factual data when considering potential policy actions.

Council Member Balius questioned the limitation to grocery stores when self-checkout systems are also used in other retail stores. He suggested that applying different standards to grocery stores than to other businesses with similar practices could be inconsistent.

Mayor Aitken suggested that additional outreach and research be conducted with other retailers that utilize self-checkout systems to better understand their staffing practices and determine whether similar issues exist outside the grocery store industry. She expressed interest in examining staffing ratios for self-checkout operations and supported maintaining at least one cashier-staffed checkout lane when self-checkout stations are in use. She inquired whether potential restrictions on the sale of alcohol through self-checkout lanes had been considered.

Council Member Kurtz confirmed that alcohol sales at self-checkout lanes are prohibited by State law.

She shared examples of self-checkout regulations adopted in other cities, including provisions limiting the number of items eligible for self-checkout, prohibiting sales of age-restricted products such as alcohol and tobacco, and restricting self-checkout use for items with theft-deterrent tags or stored in locked displays. She noted that the ordinances typically applied to grocery and drug retail establishments and did not extend to other retailers such as home improvement stores.

Mayor Aitken expressed interest in further evaluating potential self-checkout regulations. She highlighted Costa Mesa’s cure period and implementation timeline.

City Attorney Fabela advised that it may be beneficial for the Council to take action and provide direction to staff.

MOTION: Mayor Aitken moved to direct staff to prepare an ordinance for City Council consideration and explore other businesses that would be subject to the staffing and safety requirements.

DISCUSSION: Council Member Kurtz added that there would be discussions with the Grocers Association.

City Council Minutes of March 3, 2026

MOTION: Mayor Aitken moved to direct staff to prepare an ordinance for City Council consideration and explore other businesses that would be subject to the staffing and safety requirements, seconded by Council Member Kurtz.

DISCUSSION: City Attorney Fabela clarified that the motion was to request staff to prepare an ordinance similar to the City of Costa Mesa’s, with discussion about the reach of the ordinance and what other businesses may apply.

Interim City Manager Garcia stated that, based on Council feedback, a draft ordinance would be prepared in coordination with Mayor Aitken and Council Member Kurtz before being brought back to the City Council for consideration.

MOTION: Mayor Aitken moved to direct staff to prepare an ordinance for City Council consideration and explore other businesses that would be subject to the staffing and safety requirements, seconded by Council Member Kurtz. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES – 5 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Leon, Rubalcava, Kurtz, and Maahs); NOES – 2 (Council Members Balius and Meeks). Motion carried.

REPORT ON CLOSED SESSION ACTIONS: City Attorney Robert Fabela stated there was no reportable action.

PUBLIC COMMENTS (non-agenda items): None
COUNCIL AGENDA SETTING:

Mayor Aitken requested information on the annexation process for county property on the Dad Miller Golf Course. She requested additional information regarding a potential breach of contract related to the Los Angeles Angels possibly dropping “Anaheim” from its name. She inquired if the item would be considered for Closed Session discussion.

City Attorney Fabela confirmed that the item would be agendized for Closed Session. He explained that it may be related to potential litigation and agendized accordingly.

Council Member Kurtz requested that a Visit Anaheim representative provide information on the organization’s efforts to attract sports conventions in preparation for the World Cup.

Council Member Rubalcava requested a recognition for Anaheim resident, Orange Lutheran High School student, and wrestling Masters Champion, Alexa Smith, to recognize her achievements. She requested a presentation from Interim City Manager Garcia on Strategic Plan initiatives. She requested an update on potential revenue opportunities, including a rideshare tax, in advance of the deadline to place measures on the November ballot.

Council Member Meeks requested a recognition for El Rancho Charter School student Sydney Tran for winning the Orange County Spelling Bee for the second year. She shared that she would be representing Orange County at the National Spelling Bee.

Council Member Maahs requested to work with staff to explore inclusivity for the autistic community in the City. She suggested headsets for individuals to use at different City events, including Concerts in the Park.

Mayor Aitken noted that the Chance Theater offers family-friendly performances designed to accommodate individuals with autism.

City Council Minutes of March 3, 2026

Mayor Pro Tem Leon requested a recognition for the Savanna High School Girls Basketball Team on their CIF Championship.

ADJOURNMENT: With no further business before the Council, Mayor Atiken adjourned the City Council at 11:21 p.m.

Respectfully submitted,
Theresa Bass, CMC
City Clerk