Anaheim City Council
June 23, 2026

ANAHEIM CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 7, 2026
The regular meeting of April 7, 2026 was called to order at 5:00 P.M. in the Council Chamber of Anaheim City Hall, located at 200 South Anaheim Boulevard. The meeting notice, agenda, and related material were duly posted on April 2, 2026.

MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ashleigh E. Aitken and Council Members Carlos A. Leon, Ryan Balius, Natalie Rubalcava, Norma Campos Kurtz, Kristen M. Maahs, and Natalie Meeks
STAFF PRESENT: Deputy City Manager Ted White, City Attorney Robert Fabela, and City Clerk Theresa Bass
INVOCATION: Reverend Dr. Matt W. Lee, Senior Pastor of Sarang Community Church Mayor Pro Tem Leon recognized April as World Autism Month, as a reminder to lead with understanding, inclusion, and respect for every member of the community.

FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Pro Tem Carlos A. Leon
PRESENTATIONS: Recognizing Blake’s Place for 30 years of business in Anaheim Mayor Aitken recognized Blake’s Place for serving the Anaheim community for 30 years. She shared that Blake’s Place has been more than just a local family-owned business in the community. She added that the restaurant is known for its authentic, slow-smoked barbecue and welcoming atmosphere. She shared that it is a go-to spot where families and friends gather and connect. She congratulated them on 30 years and wished the restaurant continued success.

Gene Hobel thanked the Mayor, City Council, and the City for supporting the business in the community for the past 30 years. He shared that the business was founded 30 years ago and named after their son, who was six months old at the time. He noted that his son is expected to assume leadership of the business in the future and expressed gratitude to the community, employees, and customers for their continued support. He stated that Blake’s Place success would not be possible without them. He expressed hope to remain in Anaheim for many years to come.

Recognizing Radiant Beer Co. on its 5th Anniversary
Mayor Aitken recognized Radiant Beer Co. on their 5th Anniversary. She shared that Radiant Beer has become a spot where friends can gather, where families throw celebrations, and a welcoming meeting place for all. She thanked the dedicated staff and leadership whose passion drives the business.

Jonas Nemura accepted the recognition.

Recognizing Anaheim resident Alexa Smith from Orange Lutheran High School for her achievement of becoming a CIF-SS Masters Champion in wrestling Mayor Aitken recognized Anaheim resident Alexa Smith for earning a CIF-SS Master's for wrestling at Orange Lutheran High School. She shared that she rose to the top in a highly competitive field demonstrating not only exceptional athleticism but also discipline and resilience. She stated that wrestling is a very demanding sport, physically and mentally. She highlighted Alexa’s achievement in ITEM # 22
City Council Minutes of April 7, 2026

a traditionally male-dominated sport. She acknowledged and thanked Alexa’s family, coaches, and teammates who support her and helped make the achievement possible.

Alexa thanked her parents for being her number one supporter, and her coaches.

Recognizing Anaheim Local Baseball Team, Orange County Peloteros, for winning back to back Championships and giving back to their community Mayor Aitken recognized Anaheim baseball team, the Orange County Peloteros, for winning back-to- back championships. She highlighted the effort and consistency it takes to win back-to-back championships. She stated that they not only compete, but they also give back to the community.

She noted that while fundraising to travel for a tournament, the young athletes recognized that there are other children in the community facing greater challenges. She shared that they chose to raise money for the Orangewood Children and Family Center to support kids in need. She added that they have brought compassion and pride to their team while helping others. She thanked the coaches and families and congratulated them on their Championships.

Adrian, Orange County Peloteros Team Captain, expressed gratitude to the coaches and parents who support the team. He thanked Council Member Kurtz for recognizing the team.

ACCEPTANCE OF OTHER RECOGNITIONS (To be presented at a later date):

Recognizing April 6 – 10, 2026, as National Community Development Week Housing and Community Development Deputy Director Sandra Lozeau thanked the City Council for the recognition of Community Development Week. She highlighted the contributions of the Department’s nearly 90 employees. She recognized the efforts of Workforce Development, the development team for the Azure housing project, homeless services staff for quickly filling housing units, and Housing Authority staff for efficiently processing housing assistance.

Recognizing April 13 – 19, 2026, as California Mosquito Awareness Week Recognizing April 2026, as DMV Donate Life California Month Recognizing April 2026, as Arab‐American Heritage Month Recognizing April 2026, as American Muslim Appreciation and Awareness Month
ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA: City Clerk Theresa Bass reported that Public Hearing Item No. 15 was continued to the Council meeting of April 21, 2026, at the request of staff.

Without objection, Mayor Aitken took the meeting out of order to take action on the continuance of Public Hearing Item No. 15.

City Council Minutes of April 7, 2026

PUBLIC HEARING:

15. Public hearing, pursuant to Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, to consider the issuance of certain tax-exempt bonds in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $25,000 by the California Municipal Finance Authority for the Hermosa Village Phase III affordable housing project [1217 Lynne Avenue,1309 Lynne Avenue, 1329 Lynne Avenue, 1513 S. Hampstead Street, 1525 S. Hampstead Street,1543 S. Hampstead Street, 1614 S.

Hampstead Street, 1619 S. Hampstead Street, 1620 S. Hampstead Street, 1630 S.

Hampstead Street, 1624 S. Calle Del Sol, 1630 Calle del Sol, 1607 S. Calle Del Mar, 1613 S.

Calle Del Mar, 1220 W. Cerritos Avenue, and 1500 S. Ninth Street].

RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM approving the issuance of certain California Municipal Finance Authority Exempt Facility Bonds in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $25,000,000 for the purpose of financing or refinancing of the acquisition by ground lease, substantial rehabilitation, improvement, equipping, and operation of Hermosa Village Phase III affordable housing project; and making certain other findings related thereto.

MOTION: Council Member Kurtz moved to continue the public hearing to the Council meeting of April 21, 2026, seconded by Council Member Meeks. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES – 7 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Leon, Balius, Rubalcava, Kurtz, Maahs, and Meeks); NOES – 0. Motion carried.

PUBLIC COMMENTS (all agenda items, except public hearing): Prior to receipt of public comments, City Clerk Theresa Bass provided an outline of procedures for public comments, notice of translation services, and a brief decorum statement.

City Clerk Theresa Bass reported that a total of fourteen (14) public comments were received electronically prior to 3:30 P.M. [A final total of twenty (20) public comments were received electronically, distributed to the City Council, and made part of the official records]. – See Appendix.

R. Joshua Collins expressed support for the City’s affordable housing efforts in Item No. 15 and suggested prioritizing City-owned land for affordable housing, streamlining permitting processes, encouraging private-sector contributions, creating local rental assistance programs, developing tiny homes, strengthening tenant protections, and partnering with churches and nonprofits on housing initiatives. He emphasized the need for greater urgency in addressing housing challenges and shared concerns about families, including a homeless mother with children, struggling to secure stable housing. He encouraged Council Members to gain a firsthand perspective on homelessness to better understand the challenges faced by unhoused residents.

Vern Nelson requested the release of the names of the officers involved in the death of Albert Arzola, the unedited footage of the incident, and expressed concern over the treatment of the Arzola family.

He criticized the City Council’s approval of the Festival project. He noted concerns over affordability, public safety, and the decision-making process. He provided updates on a local rent control petition and encouraged Anaheim residents to support and sign the petition. He announced a meeting for the Anaheim Democrats Club and a concert.

Juanita Lopez shared that she is the grandmother of Albert Arzola and expressed grief and concern regarding the death of her grandson. She questioned the use of force and called for justice and accountability.

City Council Minutes of April 7, 2026

Christine Lopez advocated for justice and transparency in the death of her nephew, Albert Arzola.

She requested the release of the autopsy report, the identities of the officers involved, and the unedited camera footage. She emphasized the City Council’s oversight role and urged leadership regarding the matter. She expressed concern over communication issues for a recent Police Review Board meeting, noting that attendees had not been notified that the meeting had been cancelled when it was not. She described the ongoing impacts the loss has had on her family and called for accountability and transparency.

Mark Richard Daniels expressed sympathy and condolences to the Arzola family. He reflected on previous police-related incidents and shared concerns that similar incidents could occur in the future.

He shared his support of the family and acknowledged the impact of their loss.

Tracey Theodore with the Orange County Family Justice Center announced a community resource fair in recognition of Sexual Assault Awareness Month and Child Abuse Prevention Month. She noted that the event would feature more than 30 participating agencies providing resources and services for survivors of family violence. She thanked the City Council for their support and Council Members Kurtz and Maahs, and Mayor Pro Tem Leon for their participation. She invited the Council and the community to attend. She added that the Family Justice Center would be celebrating its 20th Anniversary in October with plans to host an additional resource fair.

Ruben Greg Soto described his personal experiences involving disputes with law enforcement. He alleged harassment, property interference, and dissatisfaction with responses to complaints.

Jessica Becerra, Founder and President of non-profit, Tree of New America, shared efforts to address food insecurity by providing access to food and other basic necessities through partnerships with local community organizations. She noted an increase in demand for assistance, particularly among working families facing rising housing and living costs. She added that food insecurity was an early indicator of broader economic challenges. She expressed interest in partnering with the City to expand coordinated food distribution and support services. She highlighted the organization’s existing infrastructure, volunteer network, and community partnerships.

Olivia Jauregui shared concerns regarding her sister’s employment experience after being terminated from a local business despite previously disclosing disability-related accommodations. She highlighted her sister’s resilience as a brain cancer survivor and advocated for greater inclusion and support for those with disabilities in the workplace. She encouraged the community to focus on contributions rather than limitations and emphasized the importance of creating opportunities for individuals with disabilities to succeed and participate in the community. She thanked everyone who attended in support of her and her sister.

Marc Herbert expressed support for the Arzola family. He expressed concern regarding the long-term environmental and public health impacts of fireworks at Disneyland. He reported that the fireworks affect air quality, soil, groundwater, and drinking water. He referenced complaints filed with the Air Quality Management District (AQMD) by Disney and questioned whether sufficient analysis and oversight have been conducted to evaluate the impacts of fireworks on the surrounding communities.

He urged further investigation and coordination with relevant agencies to address the environmental impacts and health concerns.

G. Price expressed concerns about the impacts of Disneyland fireworks on nearby neighborhoods, stating that ash, soot, and debris fall on vehicles, homes, and outdoor spaces. She questioned why debris cleaning efforts by Disney ceased and called for greater transparency regarding the composition of the fallout, environmental testing, and public health impacts. She urged the City to investigate residents’ concerns and ensure proper oversight and enforcement.

City Council Minutes of April 7, 2026

Tom Fielder reported on the environmental and public health impacts of Disneyland fireworks. He explained that although the transition to compressed air-launched systems reduced noise and smoke, it did not eliminate particulate emissions or pollutants. He reported the presence of metal compounds and other contaminants and raised concerns about potential exposure through air, soil, and water. He urged the Council to consider the long-term effects of fireworks on the community and environment.

Stephanie Mercadante raised concerns over perchlorate contamination in Anaheim’s water. She noted that a City well containing perchlorate is not used for regular drinking water. She explained the health risks associated with perchlorate exposure and questioned whether the City has evaluated whether fireworks are a contributing factor to contamination. She called for further investigation, transparency, and analysis regarding Anaheim’s water quality and potential environmental impacts.

She emphasized the importance of protecting the public’s health and transparency.

Mike Robbins expressed concerns about the environmental and health impacts of Disneyland fireworks, particularly perchlorate contamination, air quality, and water quality. He referenced complaints previously filed with AQMD and questioned whether studies have been conducted to evaluate the possible long-term effects on residents and visitors. He shared concerns over perchlorate detected in the City’s water system and the impacts of fireworks. He urged the Council to take an active role in investigating the issues and consider alternatives to fireworks.

Jeanine Robbins reported potential health and environmental impacts of fireworks. She explained the potential links to perchlorate contamination in the City’s water system. She criticized the City Council for not conducting further studies and questioned whether residents and visitors are adequately protected from exposure. She requested that the City agendize a discussion to initiate a cross- agency investigation with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), AQMD, the Water Board, and the Orange County Health Care Agency.

Tim Bibar requested that the City repaint and improve the parking lot striping at the Anaheim Police Department Main Station. He stated that the parking spaces, including accessible parking spaces, were difficult to see and created confusion. He suggested that maintaining the parking lot would improve accessibility and enhance the appearance for residents and visitors.

Bryan Kaye stated that City leadership has failed to follow due process and adequately respond to concerns raised by residents. He shared that greater transparency, responsiveness, and adherence to established procedures could help prevent conflict. He urged City officials to engage with residents and address concerns.

Mazatl Tepehyolotzin expressed condolences to the Arzola family and called for the release of the camera footage and greater transparency for the family. He encouraged water conservation efforts, including the replacement of grass with desert plants. He commented on recent immigration enforcement and thanked Council Member Rubalcava for accepting the Lakota Native American mural.

Grace Arzola shared her family’s ongoing grief over the loss of her nephew, Albert Arzola and requested accountability for his death. She stated that she had reviewed video footage of the incident and expressed concerns regarding the actions of the officers involved, the use of force, and medical response. She requested the release of the identities of the officers and urged City officials to review the footage. She emphasized that her family supports law enforcement but requested policy changes, improved training, transparency, and measures to prevent other incidents.

Pearl Arzola expressed her condolences to the family of the individual who passed away in a traffic incident on Lincoln. She raised concerns about the circumstances of the accident and law enforcement involvement. She expressed concerns regarding water quality, affordable housing, and City Council Minutes of April 7, 2026

the impacts of Disneyland fireworks. She criticized the influence of special interests and urged City officials to address community concerns.

Dave Zenger shared concerns regarding special interest influence in local government and the role of political action committees. He raised concerns regarding the environmental impacts of Disneyland fireworks, including smoke, debris, and air quality effects on neighborhoods. He questioned whether appropriate permits and environmental reviews have been conducted. He expressed frustration that concerns have not been addressed and urged the City Council to examine the issues and provide oversight and accountability.

COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS:

Council Member Kurtz thanked the Guinida Lane neighborhood for collaborating with the Anaheim Police Department, Community Services, and Code Enforcement to clean up the neighborhood. She thanked the departments and residents for their participation. She shared a heartwarming moment where a young man who won a bicycle and gave it to a little girl who assisted with the cleanup.

Council Member Kurtz highlighted the graduates from the SBDC Eats program. She shared that it was a six week program, in person and online, for individuals to learn how to start their own business.

She noted that the program was in Spanish and English. She added that participants learned how to obtain permits, use social media, pricing products, and advertising. She acknowledged and thanked the Economic Development Department for implementing this no cost program for residents. She thanked Cal State Fullerton for helping with the program and the Small Business Administration.

Council Member Maahs expressed her condolences to the Arzola family. She thanked staff for their response to a request to enhance support for autistic families and individuals. She shared that multiple departments have contributed to the initiative including sensory support kits and added tee times at golf courses and sensory kits and quiet spaces in City libraries. She added that headsets would be available for Concerts in the Park for the upcoming year. She acknowledged Visit Anaheim and its work to become a certified autism center. She noted that they are working with hotels and attractions to expand staff training and to make Anaheim more inclusive for residents and visitors.

She emphasized the importance of these efforts, noting that 1 in 36 children are diagnosed with autism, and small changes can have a significant impact on families. Council Member Maahs announced that on the fourth Saturday of each month from 9 a.m. to 10 a.m., she would be hosting a monthly community cleanup, with supplies available if needed. She shared that the first cleanup would take place on April 25th at Pioneer Park to clean along Sunkist Street and the area surrounding the park.

Council Member Rubalcava congratulated the Anaheim Police Department running teams who competed in the Baker to Vegas Challenge Cup Relay. She highlighted the Anaheim Elite Team who placed first in their category and fifth overall, earning the fastest team in Orange County. She recognized the representation of women on the Elite Team, marking the first time that two sworn female officers participated in the event. She shared that she would be requesting a recognition for the team. Council Member Rubalcava requested to adjourn the meeting in memory of Los Angeles County Deputy Sheriff Levi Vargas, who passed away during the Baker to Vegas run, at 30 years old, due to medical complications. Council Member Rubalcava highlighted the 100th birthday of Irving Schwartz and highlighted the history that he brings to the City. She noted that she would be requesting a recognition for Mr. Schwartz. She recognized April as Sexual Assault Awareness Month and provided an update on the March 3rd incident in District 3 on Lincoln and Olive Street. She commended coordinated response efforts from Police, Public Works, Public Utilities, and Homeless Assessment Liaison Officers, including increased patrols, community outreach, and environmental improvements. She highlighted safety enhancements along Lincoln Avenue, including upgraded LED lighting and placement of a police camera for ongoing monitoring. She also thanked the Family City Council Minutes of April 7, 2026

Justice Center for the support they have provided to the victims. She thanked the Public Works employee, Mr. Sanchez, who stayed at the scene to assist the family during the process and provide evidence toward arresting the individual. Council Member Rubalcava highlighted the acquisition and rehabilitation of the Crown Motel in District 3, converting it into housing to support vulnerable residents. She thanked City staff and volunteers for beautification efforts, including painting and landscaping. She shared her appreciation for Interim City Manager Greg Garcia and participating staff, including the communications team, for their contributions to the project. Council Member Rubalcava reported a fatal traffic accident on March 31st at Lincoln Avenue and Anaheim Boulevard that resulted in the loss of two lives. She recognized the life of Alberto Viveros Piedra and his legacy as a devoted father, grandfather, and longtime Orange County resident known for his strong work ethic and dedication. She extended condolences to his family. She also recognized Andrew Joseph Sanchez, who also passed in the accident and shared her condolences. She requested that the meeting adjourn in memory of both individuals and recognized the impact of their loss on the community and families. Council Member Rubalcava addressed a public comment regarding the alleged job termination related to a disability, emphasizing the importance of inclusion and equitable opportunities in Anaheim. She shared that she would work with Director of Economic Development Sergio Ramirez to expand resources supporting inclusive hiring, retention, and workplace success.

She stated that individuals with disabilities deserve access, dignity, and full participation in the community. She noted the broader impacts of workplace termination due to disability, including effects on stability, confidence, and long-term well-being. She recognized the speaker from District 3, who spoke on behalf of her sister. She encouraged employers to utilize available training and resources to better accommodate and support individuals with disabilities.

Mayor Pro Tem Leon requested to adjourn the meeting in memory of Marc Trejo, a 2018 graduate of Servite High School, who was tragically killed in a car accident. He shared that his girlfriend, Jennifer Alejandra Loera-Zarco, and their unborn child also passed in the crash. He stated that Marc, also known as Tiger, was a standout soccer player at Servite, earning all Trinity League honors and played a key role in the four Trinity League championships. He added that Marc also volunteered for the school’s ministry to feed the homeless in the community while working part-time at In-N-Out. He mentioned that Marc played at Vanguard University, where he earned a degree in Business Administration, followed by an MBA from Hope International University. Mayor Pro Tem Leon shared that Marc is survived by his father Tony Trejo, his mother Sandra Saldivar Trejo, and his younger brother Rocky. He extended his condolences to the family, the Servite family, and anyone who knew him.

Mayor Aitken thanked City staff and partners for the groundbreaking of Phase 2 of the OCVIBE project. She recognized the Samueli family and regional leaders for their participation and highlighted the project’s progress ahead of schedule and under budget, attributed in part to the use of union labor. She provided an update on advocacy efforts with the Big City Mayors coalition during a Sacramento trip, emphasizing the importance of securing Homelessness Assistance Program (HAP) funding. She noted that HAP funding supports key City initiatives, including transitional housing, Homekey projects, and services such as the Salvation Army and HALO programs. She emphasized the need to maintain funding to sustain those efforts. Mayor Aitken thanked Public Utilities and Public Utilities General Manager Dukku Lee for hosting the “Bright Girls” program, which introduced students to STEM careers and the Sustainability Center. She congratulated Saul, the owner of Café Biaani, on the business's third anniversary and recognized its contributions as a family-owned business in the community.

CITY MANAGER’S UPDATE:

Deputy City Manager Ted White announced that the Porsche dealership recently broke ground on off-site improvements and construction was officially underway. He shared that the site is located off City Council Minutes of April 7, 2026

Lincoln Avenue, immediately west of the Interstate 5 freeway. He reported that the land was vacant for many years and noted challenges with development. He noted that the project is expected to enhance the area’s appearance and generate significant new revenue for the City. He expressed appreciation for the partnership with the family-owned business and welcomed the new dealership to the community.

CONSENT CALENDAR: At 6:46 p.m., the Consent Calendar was considered with Council Member Kurtz pulling Item Nos. 3 and 6, Council Member Maahs pulling Item No. 10, Mayor Pro Tem Leon pulling Item No. 4, and Mayor Aitken pulling Item No. 11.

MOTION: Council Member Kurtz moved to waive reading of the ordinances and resolutions and adopt the balance of the consent calendar as presented, in accordance with reports, certifications, and recommendations furnished each City Council Member, seconded by Council Member Meeks.

ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES – 7 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Leon, Balius, Rubalcava, Kurtz, Maahs, and Meeks); NOES – 0. Motion carried.

1. Receive and file minutes of the Community Services Board meetings of February 12, 2026 and February 19, 2026; the Parks and Recreation Commission meeting of January 28, 2026; and the Public Utilities Board meeting of February 25, 2026.

2. Approve certificates recognizing Parsa Ketabi, a Santa Ana College student and Canyon High School graduate, who won a National Scholarship for community college students; Holly Hagler's retirement from Meals on Wheels Orange County after 14 years as President and CEO; and Steve Carroll, the Anaheim Ducks broadcaster, who is retiring after a 50-year career (27 seasons with the Ducks).

5. Award a contract to the lowest responsible bidder, Giles Engineering, in the amount of $1,140,841.08, for the Cerritos Avenue (Walnut Street to Ninth Street) Water Main Replacement Project; authorize the Director of Public Works to execute the contract and any other related documents, including any cost-neutral amendments of the contract and any documents contemplated by the contract, and to take such actions as are necessary, required, or advisable to implement and administer the contract; determine that the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15301(b), 15302(c), and 15303(d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; and authorize the Finance Director to execute the Escrow Agreement pertaining to contract retentions.

7. Award contract for a legal case management system that will integrate existing applications and platforms used by the City Attorney’s Office to the successful bidder, Axon Enterprises, Inc., in the amount of $299,955, which includes an annual subscription fee of $27,000- $29,000 over the five-year term, a one-time implementation cost of $62,500, and fees for configuration, data migration, and training; and authorize the City Attorney, or designee, to execute the contract documents and any amendments to those documents that do not increase the contract amount.

City Council Minutes of April 7, 2026

8. Approve six License Agreements with the County of Orange Registrar of Voters for the operation and maintenance of an Official Ballot Drop Box, each for a five year term [East Anaheim Community Center (8201 E. Santa Ana Canyon Road), Sage Park (1313 W. Lido Place), Ponderosa Park Family Resource Center (320 E. Orangewood Ave.), Chaparral Park (1770 W. Broadway Ave.), Euclid Branch Library (1340 S. Euclid St.), and the Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center (ARTIC - 2626 E. Katella Ave.)].

9. Approve Direct Payment Agreement No. 26Y-6006 with the State of California, Department of Community Services and Development to receive federally funded Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) grant funding to be applied to accounts of eligible electric utility customers, with a 3-year term; and authorize the Public Utilities General Manager, or designees, to execute the Agreement and all related or implementing documents, including cost-neutral amendments and any documents contemplated by the Agreement, and to take all actions necessary or advisable to implement and administer the Agreement.

12. ORDINANCE NO. 6624 (ADOPTION) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM repealing and replacing Chapter 10.24 (Water System Cross-Connections) of the Anaheim Municipal Code to align local and state-mandated public water system cross-connection control requirements [determine that the amendment is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because the action does not constitute a “project” within the meaning of CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3) Sections 15060(c)(2)-(3) and 15378 in that it is a regulatory/administrative action and does not approve, commit Anaheim to, or result in any physical changes to the environment and that, to the extent the action could be considered a “project,” is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3); introduced at the Council meeting of March 24, 2026, Item No. 23].

13. Approve minutes of the City Council meeting of January 27, 2026.

BUSINESS CALENDAR:

3. Approve the Anaheim Tourism Improvement District’s Fiscal Year 2024/2025 Annual Reports for its Marketing and Transportation Component Funds.

Principal Transportation Planner Joe Alcock reported that the Anaheim Tourism Improvement District (ATID) was established in 2010 with the stated goal of promoting local tourism and convention- related programs as well as transportation improvements in the Resort and Platinum Triangle areas.

He explained that the ATID operates under the general oversight and supervision of the City Council via a Management Plan. He added that the ATID Marketing Component fund is overseen by Visit Anaheim and the Transportation Component is overseen by the ATID Transportation Committee, which consists of a City Staff member, a resort hotelier who is also a Visit Anaheim Board member, and a representative from Disney.

Principal Transportation Planner Alcock reported that each year, the ATID Marketing and Transportation Component Fund annual reports are required to be submitted for the prior fiscal year to the City Council. He explained that the reports focus on financial reporting and providing project updates for the prior fiscal year. He noted that City staff with the Public Works Department, are City Council Minutes of April 7, 2026

responsible for both managing and staffing the ATID Transportation Committee; and also working to develop the Annual Report for the Transportation Component Fund.

Principal Transportation Planner Alcock shared that the Annual Report reflects nine (9) active transportation projects. He reported that FY 2024/25 revenues for the Transportation Component fund came in at $8.5 million, with expenditures in the amount of $2.6 million. He added that there were outstanding encumbrances in the amount of $9.5 million and a closing fund balance of $23.5 million.

Principal Transportation Planner Alcock provided an overview of the nine (9) projects. He reported that the first project was the Changeable Message Sign (CMS) Update. He explained that the project updated 11 existing signs with new technology, equipment, and Transportation Management Center integration. He added that the project was allocated $1.9 million and a total of $1.5 million was spent.

He noted that the project was complete with a remaining balance of $392,437, which will need to be closed out by the ATID Transportation Committee. He added that any remaining funds would be returned to the ATID Transportation Component Fund for reallocation toward a future project or projects.

Principal Transportation Planner Alcock provided an update on the Anaheim Resort Safety Bollard Pilot Program, which would provide bollard safety improvements at 4 key intersections in the Resort, including Harbor/East Esplanade, Harbor/Disney Way, Harbor/Katella, and Harbor/Convention Way.

He reported that Phase I improvements have been completed at Harbor/East Esplanade and Phase II improvements are currently underway at Harbor/Disney Way. He added that the final design work has also been completed for the remaining two intersections at Harbor/Katella and Harbor/Convention Way. He noted that the project had $2.5 million allocated to it, and to date, $1.75 million has been spent, with a project balance of $744,995. He explained that the goal is to wrap up construction at Harbor/Disney Way this year and then assess the budget and next steps for the remaining two intersections.

Principal Transportation Planner Alcock reported that the Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Improvements in the Anaheim Resort project are to provide updated signal equipment and detection systems in the Resort. He noted that the project was allocated $160,000 and to date, $137,978 has been spent, with a remaining balance of $25,000 on the project. He explained that staff would continue assessing the performance of various detection devices. He noted that if staff find one that performs to the City’s specifications, staff would re-engage with the Transportation Committee on next steps and potential budget considerations.

Principal Transportation Planner Alcock reported that the Anaheim Resort Signs project would replace older trailer-mounted signs, repair outdated signs, and replace five outdated CMSes, primarily along Ball, Harbor, and Disneyland Drive. He stated that $5.6 million was allocated to the project, and $43,487 has been spent to date, with a remaining balance of $5.5 million. He added that the project has been divided into two (one near-term and one long-term) phases. He explained that the near- term phase was focused on addressing more immediate needs like upgrades and replacements, and the second, longer-term phase would focus on placement and installation of the CMSes. He noted that staff are working with Disney to finalize CMS locations; however, it would be influenced by traffic patterns that emerge after the DisneylandForward project, for a longer-term emphasis on that project component.

Principal Transportation Planner Alcock reported that the Ball Road/Disneyland Drive Project to install signage and traffic control improvements was allocated $1.5 million. He stated that $457,225 has been spent to date and there is a remaining balance of $697,775. He noted that the project had been completed, and closeout and final expenditures would be reflected in the next Annual Report.

City Council Minutes of April 7, 2026

Principal Transportation Planner Alcock stated that the Anaheim Resort Pedestrian Circulation Study’s objective was to assess public support and construction feasibility for potential pedestrian bridges in the Resort. He noted that the Transportation Committee allocated $1.9 million to support the project. He reported that $488,569 has been spent, and the remaining balance of $1.14 million would likely be spent in FY 2025/26. He shared that Phase I had been completed and consisted of conducting a public survey and business stakeholder meetings. He explained that since those meetings, staff have been developing the construction feasibility assessment and incorporating comments received. He noted that Phase II of the public outreach program would be completed later in the year, where staff would share project findings, conclusions, and recommend potential next steps.

Principal Transportation Planner Alcock reported that the ATN Real Time Management/Passenger Information System project goal was to secure and install real-time passenger information infrastructure and systems on ATN buses, facilities, and stops, in order to enhance the overall passenger experience. He stated that $1.25 million was allocated to the project, and $1 million had been spent. He explained that the last component of the scope that needs to be delivered includes the installation of passenger information screens at the DLR Main Transportation Center; however, given ATN’s discontinuation and DisneylandForward, the component would not be delivered. He shared that as a result, ATN’s Board has taken action requesting that this project be closed out and that the remaining unspent allocation be returned to the ATID fund.

Principal Transportation Planner Alcock reported that during FY 2024/25, the Transportation Committee allocated $1.55 million to ATN to support payment of its outstanding balance. He noted that the funds were issued to ATN in FY 2025/26 and would be reflected as expended and closed out in the next FY’s annual report. He added that the City is continuing to work with ATN as it winds down operations.

Principal Transportation Planner Alcock reported that the Transportation Committee allocated $45,000 toward a Transit Feasibility Assessment to hire a consultant to complete due diligence on ATN and assess whether it was feasible to transition ATN from a non-profit to a City-led transit agency. He noted that $19,500 has been spent to date on the project and the remaining balance would be closed out in the next fiscal year. He added that the feasibility assessment concluded that it was not prudent for ATN to become a City-led transit agency and staff are now working with ATN to wind down its service and assess potential next steps for transit in the Resort.

DISCUSSION: In response to Council Member Kurtz, Director of Public Works Rudy Emami explained that the Pedestrian Circulation Study and the Resort 2.0 Study are complementary. He reported that the Pedestrian Study focuses on current and future pedestrian movement within the Resort area, including safety improvements, pedestrian volumes, parallel routes, and the feasibility, location, and costs of potential pedestrian bridges. He added that the Resort 2.0 study is a broader planning effort that examines transportation, transit, safety, Resort aesthetics, land use, and strategies to support future development and growth within the Resort District.

Council Member Kurtz inquired if the results of the Resort 2.0 study had been shared.

Director Emami confirmed that the results of the study had been shared with the consultants leading the Resort 2.0 study. He noted that the consultants are incorporating that information into their work, including evaluating transit options and how future pedestrian connections would integrate with the broader transportation network.

City Council Minutes of April 7, 2026

In response to Council Member Kurtz, Director Emami confirmed that no money is being lost as the City progresses to Resort 2.0. He reported that there are no plans for the $23.5 million reserve to be spent. He noted that as the City evaluates a replacement for ATN, the funding could serve as a potential revenue source. He noted that future recommendations from the Resort 2.0 study, potential pedestrian bridges, preliminary East-West connector studies, and other transportation-related projects could be considered as possible uses for the funds.

Mayor Aitken inquired if the Pedestrian Study would be funded using grant funds or the General Fund.

Director Emami confirmed that the study is funded by the ATID Transportation Fund.

In response to Mayor Aitken, Director Emami explained that consultants have been directed to conduct their own independent analysis and engage in community outreach to gather input from stakeholders and residents. He added that the consultants would present recommended options, which staff would evaluate and refine using knowledge and experience with the Resort area.

Mayor Aitken inquired if the information could be shared with the community for feedback.

Principal Transportation Planner Alcock explained that the initial outreach focused on feedback from businesses regarding proposed bridge locations, future forecasts, and whether the concepts were appropriate. He stated that the project team was evaluating feasibility, costs, and technical aspects of potential bridge concepts. He added that once the work is completed, the City would conduct additional public outreach, including open houses, to present and discuss the proposed concepts with the community.

Mayor Aitken expressed concern that the City has continued discussion on concepts without determining whether Council supports that direction. She noted potential impacts on hotels and private properties, including whether property acquisition or eminent domain could be required. He stated that policy and feasibility questions should be presented to Council for discussion before additional funding is spent on planning efforts that may not align with Council’s vision.

Director Emami responded that the purpose of the study was to evaluate and provide detailed information on potential pedestrian bridge concepts, including whether they could be constructed within existing rights-of-way, potential property and line-of-sight impacts, design considerations, costs, and stakeholder feedback. He explained that the study would provide Council with information needed to determine whether pursuing the bridges is appropriate and to make informed decisions on next steps.

In response to Mayor Aitken, Director Emami stated that safety is a key consideration in the City's transportation planning efforts, including the ongoing bollard program designed to protect existing pedestrian pathways within the resort area. He explained that as the City plans for future growth and increased visitor volumes, the City is evaluating additional pedestrian routes and transportation options to improve circulation and safety. He noted that studying potential locations allows the City to plan ahead, coordinate with future development projects, and ensure that any future infrastructure improvements could be integrated effectively with private developments and existing pedestrian networks.

Mayor Aitken noted that she requested to consider Item No. 11 and inquired how the Resort area transportation planning efforts, including pedestrian bridge concepts, align with the broader citywide transit strategy. Mayor Aitken questioned how the efforts relate to planned transportation City Council Minutes of April 7, 2026

improvements such as the East-West Connector and how funding sources, including ATID revenues, would be coordinated between resort-specific and Citywide transportation projects and project updates.

Director Emami explained that the funding would come from grants or other sources. He noted that the Pedestrian Circulation Study and the Master Transit Plan serve different purposes. He reported that the Circulation Study focuses on pedestrian movement and circulation at the ground level, while the Master Transit Plan addresses transit-related improvements for bus and shuttle services, the East-West Connector, transit-stop enhancements, operational efficiencies, and fare systems. He noted that while the studies are separate, they are interconnected, and the broader Resort 2.0 planning effort would be intended to coordinate and integrate the various transportation and mobility plans.

In response to Mayor Aitken, Director Emami explained that project prioritization and phasing will depend on funding availability, including grants and other revenue sources. He added that different funding opportunities may support different types of projects, such as pedestrian bridges, safety improvements, or transit initiatives. He emphasized the importance of ongoing stakeholder and community outreach to identify priorities and noted that both pedestrian safety and transit improvements are important goals. He stated that the studies would provide the information needed to coordinate, prioritize, and implement transportation improvements effectively over the next few years.

Mayor Aitken inquired if Resort workers were included in the open houses or if there was a commitment to include residents and workers.

Director Emami confirmed that it is staff’s intent. Principal Transportation Planner Alcock stated that outreach efforts included coordination with Community Services to identify and engage major employers, community organizations, nonprofit groups, and other stakeholders. He added that the City conducted two community working group meetings and two public open houses. He noted that public outreach was promoted through the City’s website, social media, City Hall communications, and advertisements on ATN buses during operations.

Executive Director of Convention, Sports and Entertainment Tom Morton reported that the ATID has two component funds, Transportation and Marketing. He introduced Visit Anaheim CEO Mike Waterman to present Visit Anaheim’s Annual Report.

Mr. Waterman presented the organization's Fiscal Year 2024/25 Annual Report, summarizing performance, key initiatives, and compliance with State recommendations. He noted that Visit Anaheim reports on a calendar year basis compared to a fiscal year. He noted that the report was updated to extrapolate data to match the City’s fiscal year reporting period. He highlighted additional updates made to reporting practices, including the addition of occupancy rates, Convention Center booking metrics, Convention Center presentations, and fund accounting tracking. He noted that the annual report was reviewed and approved by the ATID Advisory Board.

Mr. Waterman reported strong performance in 2024, meeting or exceeding several key performance indicators, including convention bookings, economic impact, and marketing impressions. He noted that for 2025, goals included increasing convention bookings, economic impact, marketing reach, and tracking definite room nights, a metric requested by the City Council. He provided an overview of Anaheim’s tourism performance, including hotel occupancy, average daily rates, revenue per available room, room revenue, hotel supply, and hotel demand, noting that Anaheim remained one of the highest-performing hotel markets in the nation despite some recent market challenges.

City Council Minutes of April 7, 2026

In response to Executive Director Morton, Mr. Waterman clarified that ADR was Average Daily Rate and RevPAR refers to Revenue Per Available Room, which is calculated using occupancy and room rate data. He noted that Anaheim's hotel market continues to outperform both California and national averages in occupancy, ADR, and RevPAR. He also highlighted significant growth in Anaheim's average room rates over the past decade, attributing the increase in part to the addition of higher-end hotel properties within the Resort area.

Mr. Waterman noted that Anaheim improved its ranking among the top U.S. convention destinations, moving from 14th place to 9th place and most recently to 3rd place among cities competing for the nation's top 250 conventions. He highlighted convention and meeting sales activity, including business booked for future years, actualized business hosted during the reporting period, and convention sales events conducted. He provided an overview of marketing and tourism performance metrics, including marketing impressions, visitor spending, accommodations revenue, non- accommodation spending, social media engagement, media coverage, tourism promotion efforts, and room-night generation. He emphasized the role of marketing, communications, and sales initiatives in supporting tourism, convention business, and economic activity in Anaheim.

Mr. Waterman stated that, in response to Council direction, Visit Anaheim included information regarding its fund balance in the Annual Report. He provided fund balance information as of June 30, 2025, and an updated balance through December 2025.

In response to Mayor Aitken, Mr. Waterman explained that room nights are tracked using digital marketing and analytics tools that allow Visit Anaheim to attribute bookings to specific promotions, campaigns, sales efforts, or marketing activities. He noted that bookings can only be directly connected to Visit Anaheim’s efforts through tracking technology are included in reporting metrics, while direct bookings made independently through hotels, attractions, or other websites are not attributed to Visit Anaheim.

Council Member Balius thanked Visit Anaheim for including additional data and trend information in the annual report, noting that the expanded reporting was helpful for evaluating performance over time. He asked about hotel performance data, specifically observing that occupancy rates during the latter part of August averaged approximately 70% while average daily room rates (ADR) appeared comparatively lower during the same period.

Mr. Waterman explained that seasonal travel patterns influence hotel occupancy and room rates. He noted that while summer is generally a strong tourism period, hotel demand typically begins to soften in August as schools resume and family travel declines. He added that as a result, the average daily room rates tend to be lower during that period before tourism activity increases again during the fall and Halloween season.

In response to Council Member Balius, Mr. Waterman explained that August is not a strong month for convention and group business, resulting in less demand generated by conventions and large events.

He noted that as a result, hotels rely more heavily on leisure travelers during that period and often compete more aggressively for bookings, which can contribute to lower average daily room rates despite relatively strong occupancy levels.

Council Member Balius inquired about occupancy rates compared to average daily rates. He explained that there were instances where the occupancy rate was 50%, and the average daily room rate was among the highest.

Mr. Waterman explained that he could not provide a definitive explanation without reviewing the data.

He suggested that higher room rates during periods of lower occupancy could be related to City Council Minutes of April 7, 2026

previously booked group events or in-house business that secured room blocks several years in advance at established rates.

In response to Council Member Kurtz, Mr. Waterman explained that Visit Anaheim is funded through the Anaheim Tourism Improvement District, which was established in 2010 when the Resort community elected to fund tourism promotion through a 2% assessment. He noted that 75% of the revenues are allocated to Visit Anaheim for marketing and tourism promotion activities, while the remaining 25% is dedicated to transportation-related purposes. He noted that the funds are generated by visitors staying at hotels, and not through the General Fund. He confirmed that revenues are collected by the City, which are distributed to the appropriate allocations. He confirmed that the City retains 1% for administrative costs.

Council Member Kurtz requested additional information on how the marketing funds are spent. In response, Mr. Waterman explained that Visit Anaheim has a 23-person board, made up primarily of hotel general managers, in the cities of Anaheim and Garden Grove. He added that Visit Anaheim represents both cities and the budget must be approved by the board.

In response to Council Member Kurtz, Mr. Waterman stated that once the budget is approved by the Visit Anaheim Board, staff determine how to implement programs and activities within the approved funding.

Council Member Kurtz inquired how ATID funds must be spent. In response, Mr. Waterman explained that the Tourism Improvement District (TID) agreement is governed by State requirements and includes restrictions on how TID funds may be used. He stated that the expenditures funded through TID revenues must provide a material benefit to the businesses and entities that pay the assessment, and that this requirement applies to tourism improvement districts throughout California, not just in Anaheim.

In response to Council Member Kurtz, Mr. Waterman reported that Visit Anaheim adjusted its marketing strategy in response to changing travel trends. He noted that after receiving feedback from tourism partners and industry representatives indicating a decline in travel from Canada to the United States, Visit Anaheim significantly reduced its marketing efforts in Canada and redirected resources to Mexico, where visitor demand was showing strong growth. He added that signs of softening summer travel demand led the organization to request and receive board approval to allocate approximately $2.5 million from reserves for supplemental domestic marketing campaigns aimed at increasing visitation during the summer and fall seasons.

Council Member Kurtz inquired about how reserve funds are spent. In response, Mr. Waterman explained that Visit Anaheim's reserve fund, totaling approximately $19 million, is designated by Visit Anaheim’s board for specific purposes. He noted that approximately $5.5 million is maintained as an operating reserve, representing about three months of operating expenses. Additional reserve allocations are designated for convention commitments, including incentives used to attract conventions and events to Anaheim; sales and marketing initiatives intended to strengthen Anaheim's competitiveness as a destination; and industry event support, which may include subsidizing receptions, transportation, or other event-related costs to secure major conventions. He added that all reserve allocations are reviewed and approved by the Visit Anaheim Board of Directors.

Mr. Waterman provided an update on the Anaheim Hospitality Housing Assistance Program, which was unanimously approved by the City Council in December. He reported that the program is intended to assist employees who live and work at ATID hotels and is expected to include rental assistance, first-time homebuyers assistance, and emergency relief components. He noted that three hotel industry representatives were selected to help develop program guidelines, representing large City Council Minutes of April 7, 2026

hotel brands, mid-sized hotels, and independent hotel operators: Paul Sanford, CEO of Wincome Hospitality, Bill O’Connell, and Greg Eisenman. He highlighted five major industry events secured for Anaheim between 2026 and 2030, which are expected to bring approximately 20,000 tourism and meeting industry professionals to the city and generate future convention and tourism business. He highlighted tourism promotion initiatives, including the “100 Days Until Summer” campaign, hosting the Savannah Bananas event, the inaugural Stand Up Chow Down event, and the Imagination Campaign, which received recognition from Visit California as the best public relations campaign. He noted that the initiatives helped drive visitation, increase awareness of Anaheim as a destination, and support local tourism-related economic activity.

Council Member Rubalcava thanked Visit Anaheim for incorporating additional data and responding to prior Council feedback. She noted that improvements had been made to the report and expressed appreciation for them. She expressed gratitude for the increased transparency, detailed information provided, and the work Visit Anaheim is doing to support tourism and economic activity in Anaheim.

Council Member Meeks thanked Visit Anaheim for including room night statistics in its reporting, noting that the metric is meaningful and easily understood by both the hospitality industry and the Council. She expressed appreciation to Visit Anaheim and local hotel operators for their support of the Hospitality Worker Housing Assistance Program, recognizing their contributions toward helping workers achieve housing stability and homeownership opportunities.

Mayor Pro Tem Leon thanked Visit Anaheim for incorporating state audit recommendations and providing additional transparency in its reporting. He emphasized the importance of Visit Anaheim’s success to the overall success of the City and requested additional information regarding domestic and international travel trends, including a monthly breakdown of visitor data from the previous year.

He expressed interest in understanding the impact of recent changes in travel patterns and sought clarification regarding Anaheim’s top international visitor markets, specifically whether Mexico or Canada has historically been the largest market.

Mr. Waterman confirmed that he could share month-to-month data on domestic and international travel information. He noted that Canada has historically been Anaheim’s largest international visitor market for approximately 50 years but recently dropped to second place behind Mexico for the first time. He added that while Canadian visitation declined, Canada remains a strong market. He reported that Visit Anaheim anticipated the shift and has adjusted its marketing efforts accordingly while continuing to work with Canadian partners to encourage future travel to Anaheim when market conditions improve.

In response to Mayor Pro Tem Leon, Mr. Waterman explained that visitor market data is obtained through a partnership with Tourism Economics, a widely used industry research firm. He stated that the company provides detailed visitation data from domestic and international markets, allowing Visit Anaheim to track travel trends and visitor activity with a high degree of accuracy.

Mayor Pro Tem Leon requested additional information on the $2.5 million in supplemental marketing.

Mr. Waterman stated that, after discussions with Council Members and staff, concerns were raised regarding the size of Visit Anaheim’s reserve funds. He shared that in response, Visit Anaheim’s Board reduced reserve levels and redirected funding toward additional marketing efforts to support local hotels experiencing softer demand. He added that the move was successful, with final results being compiled. He reported that the campaign generated approximately 174,000 trackable room nights, $55 million in trackable hotel booking revenue, and an additional $35 million in non-room visitor spending, for a total estimated economic impact of $90 million.

City Council Minutes of April 7, 2026

In response to Mayor Pro Tem Leon, Mr. Waterman shared that while Visit Anaheim would like to continue supplemental marketing investments, funding constraints related to revenue reductions limited the availability of an additional $2.5 million marketing allocation for the current year. He noted that Visit Anaheim still has funding budgeted for its seasonal marketing initiatives, including the “100 Days to Summer” campaign and other promotional efforts intended to drive visitation during the summer and fall seasons.

Mayor Pro Tem Leon inquired whether the supplemental $2.5 million marketing investment was used for new or different marketing strategies, or if the funding simply expanded existing promotional efforts and increased overall marketing activity.

Mr. Waterman explained that the supplemental marketing campaign involved both increased funding and a more targeted approach. He added that using data analytics, the marketing team identified key feeder markets that demonstrated a strong propensity to visit Anaheim and focused promotional efforts on those areas. He noted that the data-driven strategy allowed Visit Anaheim to concentrate resources on markets most likely to generate visitation rather than pursuing a broader, less targeted approach.

In response to Mayor Pro Tem Leon, Mr. Waterman stated that Visit Anaheim has been working behind the scenes to address resort-area transportation needs without drawing unnecessary attention to perceived transportation challenges. He noted that ATN data showed approximately 85% of riders traveled between the Toy Story parking lot and Disneyland, leaving a smaller segment of visitors needing alternative transportation solutions. He added that Visit Anaheim has been coordinating with hotel partners to encourage a unified transportation approach and avoid multiple independent shuttle services that could increase traffic congestion, while exploring coordinated solutions through transportation providers.

In response to Mayor Pro Tem Leon, Mr. Waterman reported that despite concerns surrounding the discontinuation of ATN services, the organization had not observed significant negative feedback through its social media during the month of April.

Mayor Pro Tem Leon thanked Visit Anaheim for taking Council feedback and incorporating it into the Annual Report.

Council Member Rubalcava noted that Visit Anaheim’s funding is tied to tourism-related revenues and remarked that the success of the tourism industry benefits both Visit Anaheim and the City. She observed that increased visitor activity and revenue generation create opportunities for future marketing investments.

Council Member Balius requested clarification regarding the impacts of the discontinuation of ATN’s services and whether operational issues had emerged following the transition. He referenced the significant role of the Toy Story parking lot shuttle service and requested an update on visitor flow and how transportation needs were being managed since the service changes took effect.

Director Emami reported that the City and Resort community had coordinated extensively in advance of the transportation service transition and that implementation had gone smoothly. He noted that most visitors appeared unaffected, largely because Disney continued operating the Toy Story shuttle service, which previously accounted for the majority of ridership. He reported that additional transportation services were established by groups of hotels and by the City of Garden Grove, helping to accommodate a significant portion of remaining riders. He stated that efforts continue to identify solutions for the remaining visitors needing circulator service but indicated that the transition had proceeded as successfully as possible under the circumstances.

City Council Minutes of April 7, 2026

Council Member Balius thanked staff for coordinating during the transition.

Council Member Kurtz thanked Visit Anaheim for incorporating feedback from both the City Council and the Advisory Board into the annual report. She thanked Chief Operating Officer Christina Dawson for her work.

Mr. Waterman acknowledged Ms. Dawson and Pepe Avila for their work.

MOTION: Council Member Kurz moved to approve the Anaheim Tourism Improvement District’s Fiscal Year 2024/2025 Annual Reports for its Marketing and Transportation Component Funds.

DISCUSSION: Director Emami clarified that the ATID Transportation Board has approved the acquisition of former ATN properties, with the item expected to return to the City Council for consideration. He noted that a significant portion of the Transportation Fund balance would be used for the purchase of these properties, which would be retained for future transit and transportation- related purposes.

MOTION: Council Member Kurz moved to approve the Anaheim Tourism Improvement District’s Fiscal Year 2024/2025 Annual Reports for its Marketing and Transportation Component Funds, seconded by Council Member Rubalcava. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES – 7 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Leon, Balius, Rubalcava, Kurtz, Maahs, and Meeks); NOES – 0. Motion carried.

Without objection, Mayor Aitken took the meeting out of order to consider Consent Calendar Item No.

11. 11. RESOLUTION NO. 2026-028 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM approving the 2026 Anaheim Transit Master Plan update.

Principal Transportation Planner Alcock reported that the City’s Transit Master Plan is a long-range vision document for improving transit in the city over the long-term. He noted that the Plan is used provide guidance for local transit advocacy, future project development prioritization, interagency coordination, and pursuit of competitive grants. He explained that the City’s current Transit Master Plan was adopted in 2007, and has changed for planned development, transit technology, and service models. He noted that in 2024, staff initiated an update to the Plan and have been working on those updates. He reported that the Plan contains a total of 14 recommendations that were subject to a robust public outreach program, which included conducting community and technical working group meetings, hosting two public open houses, and conducting a survey, where we got over 100 responses.

Principal Transportation Planner Alcock provided an overview of the Plan’s recommendation. He reported that the first category focused on developing bus stop and access improvement recommendations, working to improve transit stops and their connecting infrastructure. He stated that the second category focused on what ATN’s service area was, and entailed identifying considerations for future resort area transit service. He added that the third category developed capital improvement recommendations for new service types, followed by service improvement recommendations.

Principal Transportation Planner Alcock reported that for the Bus Stop/Access improvements, staff focused on identifying improvement options at transit stops, including providing more shelters, seating options, electronic signage, and real-time arrival information, maps, and route schedules. He added that the next recommendation in the category is to fill in sidewalk gaps, where gaps provide an City Council Minutes of April 7, 2026

impediment to accessing transit stops and recommends that transit signage be uniform throughout the City, so that the system is easier to navigate and understand.

Principal Transportation Planner Alcock reported that the next set of recommendations were initially for ATN prior to ATN’s announcement of service discontinuation. He explained that staff reviewed the recommendations and found that regardless of who is providing the service, these are good long- term system improvement recommendations for the Resort area, which should be considered as the City, in association with resort stakeholders, assessing both near-term and long-term next steps. He reported that the first recommendation identified a need for a more user-friendly transit app. He added that staff would be recommending that Resort-area transit routes be streamlined and simplified. He explained that ATN was operating a complex system, leading to rider confusion and high operational costs. He added that the final recommendation would be to implement a clear route schedule with timetables for each route, so that riders will know when to expect the next bus.

Principal Transportation Planner Alcock reported that for capital investment, staff is recommending high-capacity transit on several high-volume bus routes traversing the City, that the East/West Transit Connector concept be maintained, and that the City have minor roadway capital improvement modifications to support enhanced bus speeds.

Principal Transportation Planner Alcock stated that for Service Improvement Recommendations, staff have identified working with transit stakeholders, including OCTA and Metrolink, to add more frequent service on high ridership routes. He noted that it includes working with OCTA to increase frequency on its top 8 ridership routes in the City and for Metrolink, advocating for more off-peak and weekend service, so that individuals working non-traditional schedules and those looking to use transit to get to entertainment activities are able to do so. He added that another important service improvement recommendation is to simplify fares and establish transfer agreements. He highlighted the complexity of transfer policies existing between the various transit operators in Anaheim. He explained that staff are recommending that as a policy, the City work with all transit providers to standardize fare structures, payment methods, and transfer agreements.

Principal Transportation Planner Alcock reported that the final service improvement recommendation is to evaluate the usage of microtransit services in areas of the City, such as Anaheim Canyon and Anaheim Hills. He explained that staff believe that these areas would benefit from microtransit services and recommended an evaluation for feasibility to determine if microtransit is a transit service model that can work in these areas.

DISCUSSION: Mayor Pro Tem Leon recommended updating the report to refer to ATN in the past tense.

Director Emami confirmed the change.

Mayor Pro Tem Leon thanked staff for clarifying the role of the various boards and agencies involved in developing transportation recommendations. He noted that the Transit Master Plan serves as a long-term vision document and asked staff to explain the next steps for implementation, including how the City and partner agencies would move from planning recommendations to specific projects and actions.

Director Emami explained that the Transit Master Plan is a high-level planning document that identifies both near-term improvements and long-term transportation initiatives. He noted that some recommendations would be implemented in the near future, while others will continue to be advanced through ongoing projects such as the East-West Connector. He added that the plan would also support future grant applications by demonstrating long-range planning priorities. He noted that City Council Minutes of April 7, 2026

community outreach efforts identified transportation concerns that may be outside the City's direct control, but the feedback would be shared with partner agencies and may be used to support future advocacy efforts and regional transportation improvements.

Mayor Pro Tem Leon agreed with the long-term planning approach but emphasized the importance of addressing near-term transportation concerns as they are identified through community outreach. He cited more frequent service on key OCTA routes as an example of an improvement that could be pursued sooner rather than later and expressed interest in understanding the next steps for advancing such recommendations, including potential coordination with OCTA staff and regional transportation partners.

Council Member Meeks noted that the planning process revealed opportunities to coordinate transportation improvements across multiple systems. She highlighted recommendations related to a more user-friendly transit application and integrated fare payment systems, emphasizing the importance of ensuring that any future resort-area circulator service is compatible with broader regional transit networks. She encouraged staff to pursue solutions that integrate with countywide or statewide transit payment and technology platforms rather than creating separate systems for individual services.

Director Emami agreed that integrated transit technology and fare systems have been successfully implemented in other regions and can serve as models for Anaheim. He stated that as the City evaluates future transportation options for the resort area, ensuring compatibility with broader transit networks and user-friendly technology will remain a key consideration in the planning process.

Council Member Maahs echoed Council Member Meeks’ comments. She requested clarification on whether bus stop amenity upgrades would be focused on the Resort area or Citywide.

Director Emami explained that bus stop amenity improvements were initially focused in the Resort District due to an OCTA grant program targeting the county’s busiest bus routes. He noted that funding allowed the City to pilot enhanced bus stop features, including seating alternatives such as stools, leaning rails, and other amenities. He stated that the pilot was successful and that the City is now seeking additional funding opportunities to expand similar improvements to other areas throughout Anaheim.

In response to Council Member Maahs, Director Emami stated that bus stops with shelters are equipped with lighting as part of the amenity improvements. He noted that for bus stops without shelters, lighting is addressed through coordination with the Public Utilities Department as part of broader efforts to improve street lighting Citywide. He added that specific locations with lighting concerns can be reviewed and addressed as needed.

Council Member Maahs raised concerns about Anaheim’s aging population and asked how future transportation planning accounts for the growing number of older adults who may no longer be able to drive. She inquired whether demographic trends are factored into the City’s transportation planning and forecasting efforts.

Director Emami responded that demographic trends are generally analyzed at the county level, with Orange County leading efforts to assess changing transportation needs through programs such as OC Access. He highlighted the success of the City's Senior Wheels program and noted that, as the senior population grows, existing transportation services and infrastructure provide a foundation that can be expanded to meet increasing demand.

City Council Minutes of April 7, 2026

Council Member Balius inquired whether the study concluded that existing services are adequate, should be expanded, or if any specific recommendations were developed regarding senior and paratransit transportation needs.

Director Emami reported that staff had not specifically evaluated those needs.

Council Member Balius asked whether the Transit Master Plan considered future regional transit expansions, specifically the potential extension of the OC Streetcar/Southwest Gateway Line beyond its planned route toward Anaheim and Garden Grove. He acknowledged that such projects may fall under the jurisdiction of regional transportation agencies but questioned whether the feasibility of future connections or extensions should be included as part of the City's long-range transportation planning efforts.

Director Emami responded that the potential extension of the OC Streetcar/Southwest Gateway Line is broader in scope than the Transit Master Plan but acknowledged it as a topic worthy of further discussion. He noted that the project would involve OCTA right-of-way and regional planning efforts and stated that the City could work with its OCTA board representatives to revisit the concept, particularly in light of ongoing transit developments and studies in the region.

In response to Council Member Balius, Director Emami confirmed that it could be mentioned in the Transit Master Plan Update.

Council Member Rubalcava thanked staff for including recommendations to increase bus service frequency, noting that service disruptions and reduced schedules have significantly impacted residents, particularly those who rely on transit on weekends. She also expressed appreciation for plans to enhance bus stop amenities, including shelters and seating, recognizing the importance of providing comfort and shade for transit riders. She acknowledged past concerns related to safety at bus stops, and noted that ongoing efforts by the Police Department and the HALO Team may help address those issues and supported continued monitoring as improvements are implemented.

In response to Mayor Pro Tem Leon, Director Emami confirmed the plan was last updated 19 years prior.

Mayor Pro Tem Leon asked how often the Transit Master Plan should be updated and whether it is intended to function as a strategic planning document that can be reviewed periodically.

Director Emami explained that the plan should be reviewed and updated every five to seven years.

Mayor Pro Tem Leon noted that the previous transit plan had not been updated for approximately 19 years and emphasized that significant changes have occurred since that time, including developments that have emerged since the draft was prepared. He asked whether upcoming events, such as the 2028 Olympics, are being considered in transportation planning and whether those events could influence the prioritization or timing of specific transit projects and recommendations identified in the plan.

Director Emami stated that planning documents such as the Transit Master Plan help position the City to pursue funding opportunities associated with major events like the 2028 Olympics. He noted that projects identified in the plan, such as bus-only lanes and queue-jump improvements, could potentially qualify for Olympic-related funding. He added that if implemented, the improvements would not only support transportation needs during the Olympics but also provide long-term benefits and serve as lasting infrastructure improvements for the community.

City Council Minutes of April 7, 2026

In response to Mayor Pro Tem Leon, Director Emami clarified that the Transit Master Plan does not identify a defined list of specific projects but instead provides high-level transportation recommendations. He explained that individual project locations and improvements would be evaluated in the future based on need, funding opportunities, and implementation priorities.

Mayor Aitken referenced the East-West Connector and other long-range transportation initiatives, including high-speed rail connections, noting that such projects have been discussed in transportation planning efforts for many years. She asked staff to provide input on how long the East-West Connector has been under consideration and how it fits within the City's long-term transportation planning goals.

Director Emami responded that the concept of the East-West Connector has been discussed for approximately 15 years, originating from earlier efforts to explore a streetcar system. He explained that although those efforts were ultimately discontinued, he noted that the City is revisiting the concept as community feedback continues to identify east-west connectivity as a transportation priority.

In response to Mayor Aitken, Director Emami stated that implementation of a major project such as the East-West Connector would likely extend beyond the 2028 Olympics. He explained that the environmental review alone could take approximately 18 to 24 months, followed by design and construction phases. He added that with funding available immediately, the process would require five to six years to complete.

MOTION: Mayor Aitken moved to approve RESOLUTION NO. 2026-028 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM approving the 2026 Anaheim Transit Master Plan update, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Leon. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES – 7 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Leon, Balius, Rubalcava, Kurtz, Maahs, and Meeks); NOES – 0. Motion carried.

4. Award a construction contract to the lowest responsible bidder, Outsource Utility Contractor, LLC, in the amount of $4,877,934.60 plus a 10% contingency, for the Park Substation Line Extension Project to the Gypsum Canyon Memorial Park Development; authorize the Director of Public Works, or designees, to execute the contract and any other related documents, including any cost-neutral amendments of the contract and any documents contemplated by the contract, and to take such actions as are necessary, required, or advisable to implement and administer the contract; determine that the project is statutorily and categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080.62 and CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3) Sections 15301(b), 15302(c) and (d), and 15303 and further determine that none of the exceptions to the categorical exemptions set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 apply; and authorize the Finance Director to execute the Escrow Agreement pertaining to contract retentions in accordance with Public Contract Code Section 22300.

Director Emami reported that the item is the award of the construction contract for the Park Substation Line Extension Project to the Gypsum Canyon Memorial Park Development. He stated that the project would install new underground electrical infrastructure and street lighting along Santa Ana Canyon Road to support future development. He noted that Public Utilities would provide the improvements, with costs reimbursed by the project applicant. He reported that staff recommended awarding the contract to Outsource Utility Contractor, LLC, and that the bid is consistent with current market conditions. He added that the project is anticipated to begin in the third quarter of 2026 with completion in 2027.

City Council Minutes of April 7, 2026

DISCUSSION: Mayor Pro Tem Leon expressed support for the project, describing it as another important step toward the development of the Veterans Cemetery and noting that it is an honor for Anaheim to serve as the cemetery's location. He highlighted the significance of continuing progress on the project and asked staff for clarification regarding the proposed water main extension, specifically whether the utility improvements must occur sequentially or can proceed concurrently with the project timeline.

Public Utilities General Manager Dukku Lee explained that the water main extension is currently in the design-build procurement process and is expected to return to the City Council for consideration later in the summer. He noted that various alternatives were evaluated to avoid extending the water main, but it was ultimately determined that a potable water connection would be necessary. He estimated that the water main project would take approximately two years to complete.

In response to Mayor Pro Tem Leon, General Manager Lee stated that the water main extension design process is expected to take approximately one year, with construction beginning thereafter.

He noted that there may be some overlap between project phases and explained that efforts are being made to avoid unnecessary costs and duplication of work. He explained that final paving associated with the current utility improvements will be deferred until after completion of the water main project, allowing final roadway restoration to occur once all utility work has been completed.

Mayor Pro Tem Leon requested additional information on mitigation measures for traffic concerns.

Director Emami explained that the project will follow the City's Good Neighbor construction practices, including limiting construction activities to off-peak traffic hours, generally beginning after 8:30 a.m. and ending before 3:30 p.m. He noted that extensive public outreach will be conducted, including advance notifications and changeable message signs to alert motorists of construction activity and potential delays. He added that the roadway is used primarily by commuters seeking an alternative to the 91 Freeway rather than by local residents, so impacts to Anaheim residents are expected to be limited.

In response to Mayor Pro Tem Leon, noted that the Transportation Corridor Agencies (TCA) project connecting the 241 Toll Road to the 91 Freeway will utilize a portion of the roadway as a detour route during nighttime freeway closures. He stated that TCA will also participate in certain roadway restoration efforts, and that close coordination will occur between the various projects to minimize impacts and ensure efficient construction and restoration activities. He confirmed no anticipated delays due to overlapping construction.

Mayor Pro Tem Leon thanked staff for their work and for another step forward for the development of the Veterans Cemetery.

Council Member Meeks echoed Mayor Pro Tem Leon’s comments and shared her support or the Veterans Cemetery project, noting its importance to the community. She also highlighted additional benefits of the project beyond the cemetery itself, including roadway resurfacing and infrastructure improvements. She noted that the project would expand and provide underground electrical service in an area with limited existing utility infrastructure, providing long-term benefits to the surrounding area.

General Manager Lee clarified that while the project includes installation of new underground utility infrastructure, the existing overhead utility poles and lines are owned by Southern California Edison.

He explained that as a result, undergrounding Edison's facilities is not included in the current project scope. He added that any future undergrounding of the electrical lines would require separate funding sources, such as a developer contribution, grants, or other external resources.

City Council Minutes of April 7, 2026

In response to Council Member Meeks, General Manager Lee reported that the line serves the Kindred Church area. He explained that when the work is complete, Public Utilities would service the area.

Council Member Meeks sought clarification regarding the existing Southern California Edison utility lines, asking whether the overhead electrical infrastructure serves additional properties beyond Kindred Community Church.

General Manager Lee explained that the existing Southern California Edison overhead line serves traffic signal controllers and other utility functions in addition to nearby properties. He noted that the line transitions from underground facilities along Weir Canyon Road, rises to overhead infrastructure near Santa Ana Canyon Road, and continues through the Gypsum Canyon area. He stated that the existing Southern California Edison line functions as a tie line used to route power through the area and, therefore, Edison does not currently have an operational need to underground the facilities. He added that Edison has installed covered conductors on the line as part of its wildfire mitigation efforts.

Council Member Meeks noted that the roadway consists of a single lane in each direction and inquired whether traffic could continue to operate with one lane open in each direction throughout construction, except for limited short-term closures during overnight or off-peak hours.

Director Emami confirmed the City would be able to use traffic control around the area.

In response to Mayor Aitken, General Manager Lee explained that the cost to underground electrical utility lines typically ranges from approximately $4 million to $6 million per mile, and can exceed $8 million per mile in more congested areas. For the mile-and-a-half segment under discussion, he estimated undergrounding costs could exceed $9 million to $10 million. He noted that Southern California Edison is not obligated to fund undergrounding projects in areas where the facilities primarily serve transmission or routing functions rather than local customers. He added that the issue is not unique to the project area, as Edison maintains approximately 50 miles of facilities throughout Anaheim that traverse the City despite not directly serving Anaheim utility customers.

In response to Council Member Balius, General Manager Lee stated that grant funding for utility undergrounding could be a possibility in the future; however, recent Department of Energy transmission grant programs have primarily focused on large-scale regional and interstate transmission projects rather than local distribution infrastructure. He noted that efforts have been made to seek congressional support for expanding eligibility to include distribution-level projects, but indicated that the current funding cycle is unlikely to provide a viable opportunity for this particular project.

Council Member Balius asked whether, if future Speed to Power through Accelerated Reconductoring and other Key Advanced Transmission Technology Upgrades (SPARK) grant programs were expanded to include local utility distribution projects, it would be appropriate to encourage residents and stakeholders to contact their congressional representatives and advocate for the inclusion of local utility infrastructure in grant eligibility criteria.

General Manager Lee suggested that pursuing a congressional support letter would be an effective first step toward expanding grant eligibility for local utility distribution projects. He noted that obtaining support from additional elected representatives could help encourage the Department of Energy to consider distribution-level infrastructure in future funding programs and indicated that coordinated advocacy may be more effective than individual letters submitted separately.

City Council Minutes of April 7, 2026

Council Member Balius suggested that the City Council consider formally supporting efforts to expand grant eligibility for local utility infrastructure projects. He proposed bringing a support letter before the Council for consideration and possible approval, with the intent of sending it to state and federal legislators to advocate for broader funding opportunities.

MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Leon moved to award a construction contract to the lowest responsible bidder, Outsource Utility Contractor, LLC, in the amount of $4,877,934.60 plus a 10% contingency, for the Park Substation Line Extension Project to the Gypsum Canyon Memorial Park Development; authorize the Director of Public Works, or designees, to execute the contract and any other related documents, including any cost-neutral amendments of the contract and any documents contemplated by the contract, and to take such actions as are necessary, required, or advisable to implement and administer the contract; determine that the project is statutorily and categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080.62 and CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3) Sections 15301(b), 15302(c) and (d), and 15303 and further determine that none of the exceptions to the categorical exemptions set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 apply; and authorize the Finance Director to execute the Escrow Agreement pertaining to contract retentions in accordance with Public Contract Code Section 22300, seconded by Council Member Meeks. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES – 7 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Leon, Balius, Rubalcava, Kurtz, Maahs, and Meeks); NOES – 0. Motion carried.

6. Approve an agreement with RAK Development, Inc., dba Kreuzer Consulting Group, in the amount of $903,843 plus a 15% contingency for a total contract amount not to exceed $1,039,419, to provide Program Manager Professional Services for the DisneylandForward project, and authorize the Director of Public Works, or designee, to execute the agreement and related documents and to take the necessary actions to implement and administer the agreement [services will be fully reimbursed by Disney].

DISCUSSION: Council Member Kurtz inquired if the reimbursement was part of the DisneylandForward project and commitment from Disney.

Director Emami explained that as part of DisneylandForward, Disney committed to reimbursing the City for staff and consultant costs associated with project review. He added that to provide expedited review services without increasing City staffing for a temporary period, the City sought a qualified consultant with experience in Resort-area projects and familiarity with City processes. Following a competitive procurement process, a consultant was selected to focus on Disney-related right-of-way improvements, including intersections, roadway projects, and access improvements associated with new parking facilities. He noted that all consultant costs will be reimbursed by Disney and that the additional support will help ensure timely plan review and project processing.

MOTION: Council Member Kurtz moved to approve an agreement with RAK Development, Inc., dba Kreuzer Consulting Group, in the amount of $903,843 plus a 15% contingency for a total contract amount not to exceed $1,039,419, to provide Program Manager Professional Services for the DisneylandForward project, and authorize the Director of Public Works, or designee, to execute the agreement and related documents and to take the necessary actions to implement and administer the agreement [services will be fully reimbursed by Disney].

DISCUSSION: Mayor Aitken thanked staff for clarifying that consultant costs associated with DisneylandForward project reviews will be fully reimbursed by Disney. She emphasized the importance of noting that these services are funded by Disney rather than the City, stating that without dedicated resources, City staff could face significant workload impacts that would affect City Council Minutes of April 7, 2026

service to other businesses and development projects throughout Anaheim. She expressed appreciation that this arrangement was negotiated as part of the DisneylandForward agreement and supported moving the item forward.

MOTION: Council Member Kurtz moved to approve an agreement with RAK Development, Inc., dba Kreuzer Consulting Group, in the amount of $903,843 plus a 15% contingency for a total contract amount not to exceed $1,039,419, to provide Program Manager Professional Services for the DisneylandForward project, and authorize the Director of Public Works, or designee, to execute the agreement and related documents and to take the necessary actions to implement and administer the agreement [services will be fully reimbursed by Disney], seconded by Council Member Maahs. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES – 7 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Leon, Balius, Rubalcava, Kurtz, Maahs, and Meeks); NOES – 0. Motion carried.

10. RESOLUTION NO. 2026-029 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM adopting a Letter of Understanding establishing terms and conditions of a Peer Support Canine Program for employees represented by the Anaheim Firefighters Association, Local No. 2899.

Approve the establishment of a Peer Support Canine Program within Anaheim Fire & Rescue to provide mental health and wellness support to department personnel through the use of a trained therapy dog; authorize the Fire Chief to enter into partnership agreements with qualified canine therapy organizations for the acquisition, training, and placement of a peer support dog; authorize the Fire Chief to designate a department member as the primary canine handler and to implement program policies and procedures; and amend the FY 2025/26 Anaheim Fire & Rescue budget in the amount of $9,517.

DISCUSSION: Council Member Maahs thanked staff for their service and expressed enthusiasm about the potential addition of a peer support canine for the department. She requested clarification regarding current practices, specifically whether the department has historically relied on peer support canines from neighboring agencies, such as Orange or Huntington Beach, when such services were needed.

Fire Chief Patrick Russell confirmed that the City uses two agencies, Huntington Beach or the Orange County Fire Authority.

In response to Council Member Maahs, Chief Russell reported that the City has never had a peer support canine. He noted that the City has used working canines for Urban Search and Rescue and arson accelerant.

Council Member Maahs expressed strong support for the proposed peer support canine program and highlighted the mental health challenges faced by firefighters and first responders. She noted that a significant percentage of firefighters experience clinically significant levels of anxiety and depression, and that first responders face elevated risks related to suicide. She emphasized the importance of providing mental health resources and support programs to address the unique stresses associated with emergency response professions.

Chief Russell confirmed the statistics regarding mental health challenges and suicide risks among firefighters and first responders, noting that the figures are both accurate and concerning. He introduced Battalion Chief Patrick Burton, who oversees the department’s wellness, peer support, and mental health programs, explaining that he was present to provide additional information and answer questions regarding the department’s wellness initiatives and support services.

City Council Minutes of April 7, 2026

Council Member Maahs acknowledged the significant risks faced by firefighters, including exposure to hazardous conditions, increased cancer risks, and the mental health impacts associated with emergency response work. She emphasized the importance of recognizing these challenges and asked staff to describe the department’s existing peer support and wellness resources available to firefighters and first responders.

Chief Russell reported that the department has a chaplain service, trained firefighters that serve as the first level of peer support, and clinicians on call 24/7.

Battalion Chief Burton explained that the department currently provides multiple layers of peer support and wellness resources, including partnerships with the Police Department, access to clinicians, and an internal peer support team. He noted that one of the greatest challenges is overcoming the stigma associated with seeking help. He added that the internal peer support program is intended to create a trusted and approachable support network, making it easier for firefighters to reach out to colleagues or mental health professionals. He emphasized that counseling services are confidential and that several support options are available to employees.

Council Member Maahs expressed support for the item.

Mayor Aitken expressed support for the proposed peer support canine program but sought clarification regarding the funding request. She noted that earlier discussions suggested the program costs could be absorbed within the department’s existing budget but observed that the current item includes an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2025/26 General Fund budget. She inquired whether the budget amendment was required and whether the request applies to the current fiscal year, future years, or both.

Chief Russell clarified that the initial startup cost of approximately $9,500 for the peer support canine program will be funded through the Fire Department’s existing discretionary budget and does not require additional General Fund resources. He acknowledged that the request, including a budget amendment, should be removed and that the program costs will be absorbed within the department’s current budget.

In response to Mayor Aitken, Chief Russell confirmed that the peer support canine program is expected to take approximately six to eight months to implement, including the selection and training of both the canine and its handler. He noted that since implementation will extend into the next fiscal year, ongoing program expenses will be covered through the Fire Department’s existing discretionary budget. He stated that sufficient funding is available within the department’s current budget to support the program without requiring additional City funding.

Mayor Aitken requested clarification on the costs for the animal per year.

Chief Russell confirmed that the cost is $9,500 for one dog for a year. He confirmed that the annual program cost estimate includes the handler’s allocated salary and benefits, supplies and equipment, training expenses, and dedicated time for peer support activities involving the canine. He noted that the projected costs are calculated on an annual basis and account for the hours required to maintain the peer support canine program and ongoing training for both the handler and the dog.

In response to Mayor Aitken, Chief Russell clarified that earlier cost estimates reflected a long-term concept that contemplated the potential need for two peer support canines based on the size of the department. He explained that the current proposal is limited to a single canine, with the department planning to track usage, call-outs, and program demand to evaluate future needs. He added that if City Council Minutes of April 7, 2026

program activity demonstrates a need for a second canine, staff would return to the Council with a separate request and funding discussion. He noted that while the current program can be supported through discretionary funding, a future expansion to a second canine may require a dedicated budget appropriation.

Mayor Aitken sought clarification on whether the designated handler would be removed from a station or if the program would be structured to avoid impacts on emergency service staffing and response capabilities.

Chief Russell explained that there may be limited occasions when a firefighter assigned as a canine handler would be temporarily unavailable for regular duties, similar to situations involving fire investigations, training assignments, medical appointments, or other operational needs. He stated that the department routinely adjusts staffing to maintain minimum deployment levels and keep units in service, utilizing available personnel and operational flexibility as needed. He emphasized that Battalion Chiefs continuously manage staffing resources throughout the day to ensure emergency response capabilities are maintained while accommodating necessary assignments.

Mayor Aitken referenced information reviewed regarding annual training requirements for peer support canine handlers and sought clarification on the program’s training assumptions. She noted that annual certification appears to require approximately 24 hours of training and asked why the program budget includes an additional eight hours. She inquired whether the additional training hours are mandatory for certification, and whether compensation for those hours would only occur if the training is completed or required.

Chief Russell noted that the additional eight hours included in the program estimate appear to provide flexibility for supplemental training or unforeseen needs. He explained that if no additional training is necessary beyond the required 24 hours, the handler would not be sent to or compensated for training beyond the minimum certification requirements.

Mayor Aitken asked whether the peer support canine program is required to continue indefinitely because it was established through a Letter of Understanding (LOU) with the Firefighters Association.

She inquired whether the program could be discontinued if it proves unsuccessful or if no qualified employee is interested in serving as a canine handler and whether future funding would remain subject to annual discretionary budget decisions.

Chief Russell explained that, like other specialty assignments within the department, the peer support canine program operates at the discretion of the Fire Chief. He noted that if there were no qualified or willing handlers, or if the department determined it could no longer effectively support the program, the Fire Chief could suspend or discontinue it. He referenced prior canine programs that had been suspended when qualified handlers were unavailable and stated that a similar approach would apply to the peer support canine program if necessary.

In response to Mayor Aitken, Chief Russell explained that oversight of the peer support canine program would fall under the department’s Deputy Chief of the Operations Division. He noted that he would monitor the program closely. He added that Battalion Chief Burton would oversee day-to-day operations and maintain detailed records, including the number of deployments, duration of responses, and the types of individuals served, such as firefighters, other first responders, City employees, or civilians. He stated that the data would allow the department to evaluate the program and provide updates as needed.

Mayor Aitken requested that, if approved, the peer support canine program include ongoing tracking and reporting of actual program costs, training hours, and any overtime incurred as a result of City Council Minutes of April 7, 2026

program operations in order to provide a complete assessment of its impact. She inquired whether the program’s policies and procedures have already been drafted and, if not, sought clarification regarding who will be responsible for developing them and the anticipated timeline for completion.

Chief Russell stated that the peer support canine program policies and procedures are currently being finalized and are substantially complete. He explained that Deputy Chief Grant and Battalion Chief Burton have been working collaboratively with the Firefighters Association to address any outstanding questions and ensure mutual understanding of the program requirements. He stated that the policies primarily address operational matters, such as canine care, housing, and day-to-day program administration, while financial provisions are addressed separately in the Letter of Understanding. He reported that the policies would be completed in the following month, following a review by the department and the Firefighters Association. Chief Burton confirmed that the policies are complete.

In response to Mayor Aitken, Chief Russell stated that Risk Management has been involved in the development of the peer support canine program from the outset and has reviewed and provided input on the draft policies.

Mayor Aitken expressed her enthusiasm for the program and hoped for success and potential future expansion.

Council Member Balius expressed support for the peer support canine program, noting the positive effect dogs can have on stress reduction and overall well-being. He asked whether the addition of a peer support canine and handler could have any impact on the department’s level of service or emergency response capabilities, emphasizing the importance of maintaining operational capabilities readiness.

Chief Russell stated that the peer support canine program is not expected to have a significant impact on the department’s level of service. He acknowledged that there may be occasional short- term operational adjustments when personnel are assigned to program-related activities, but noted that the department routinely manages staffing flexibility to accommodate various needs. He emphasized that any temporary adjustments would be handled in a manner that maintains service levels and operational readiness.

Council Member Balius emphasized the importance of tracking operational data related to the peer support canine program, including any impacts on staffing and service levels, and expressed appreciation that the department plans to monitor those metrics. He thanked staff for including provisions in the program design to ensure the canine’s well-being, noting appreciation for the policy that allows the dog to return home with its handler after shifts to provide adequate rest and maintain a healthy work-life balance for the animal.

Council Member Rubalcava expressed support for the peer support canine program, citing the importance of mental health and wellness initiatives for first responders. She thanked the Fire Department for funding the program through its existing discretionary budget rather than requesting additional funding. She inquired whether a resolution and Letter of Understanding process was used rather than being implemented administratively through the department’s existing budget authority.

City Attorney Robert Fabela explained that the Letter of Understanding requires Council approval and the program would include premium pay for the employee.

Council Member Rubalcava stated that the use of a Letter of Understanding and related compensation provisions for the peer support canine program appeared more complex than City Council Minutes of April 7, 2026

necessary and suggested that similar program elements be incorporated during future labor agreement negotiations when possible. She noted that doing so could streamline the approval process and reduce administrative burden. She expressed support for the initiative, thanked firefighters for their service, and stated that adding a peer support canine would be a valuable resource for department personnel.

Mayor Pro Tem Leon expressed support for the program. He shared his support for initiatives that strengthen mental health resources for first responders and thanked staff for advancing the program.

City Attorney Fabela clarified that the motion would be to approve staff’s recommendation without the budget amendment.

MOTION: Council Member Maahs moved to approve RESOLUTION NO. 2026-029 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM adopting a Letter of Understanding establishing terms and conditions of a Peer Support Canine Program for employees represented by the Anaheim Firefighters Association, Local No. 2899, and approve the establishment of a Peer Support Canine Program within Anaheim Fire & Rescue to provide mental health and wellness support to department personnel through the use of a trained therapy dog; authorize the Fire Chief to enter into partnership agreements with qualified canine therapy organizations for the acquisition, training, and placement of a peer support dog; and authorize the Fire Chief to designate a department member as the primary canine handler and to implement program policies and procedures, seconded by Mayor Aitken. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES – 7 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Leon, Balius, Rubalcava, Kurtz, Maahs, and Meeks); NOES – 0. Motion carried.

14. Presentation by Visit Anaheim on the value of sports tourism and sports group business in the City of Anaheim [informational item].

Executive Director of Convention, Sports and Entertainment Tom Morton introduced Visit Anaheim Convention Sales, Sports Development Director, Katie Wright to present.

Ms. Wright provided an overview of the organization’s sports tourism efforts, emphasizing the economic and community benefits of sports-related events, including tourism growth, health and wellness, civic pride, international exposure, and brand recognition for Anaheim. She explained that the collaborative relationship between Visit Anaheim and the Orange County Sports Commission, noting that while both organizations work to attract sporting events, Visit Anaheim focuses on events that generate business for Anaheim and the Convention Center, while the Sports Commission promotes opportunities throughout Orange County. She highlighted several recent and upcoming sports tourism successes, including the return of the esports event BlizzCon in 2026, which is expected to generate significant hotel demand, successful USA Volleyball tournaments that brought hundreds of teams and thousands of room nights to Anaheim, and the booking of national fencing events that will utilize underused Convention Center space. She noted that the events contribute substantial economic benefits and help diversify Convention Center business while creating opportunities for future repeat events.

Ms. Wright outlined key priorities for 2026, including positioning Anaheim as a premier destination for volleyball events, strategically filling available Convention Center dates with complementary events, and expanding Anaheim’s presence in the esports and gaming markets. She described efforts to maximize Convention Center utilization by targeting events that fit available space and balancing event types to manage facility impacts. She reported ongoing efforts to develop relationships with major gaming and Esports organizations and to increase Anaheim’s exposure through industry City Council Minutes of April 7, 2026

conferences and direct outreach to event organizers. She identified Anaheim’s primary competitors as Orlando, Dallas, Houston, Los Angeles, Las Vegas, Atlanta, and San Diego, noting that financial incentives, venue costs, and host fees are often the most significant factors in attracting events. She acknowledged competition from destinations with larger incentive programs. She emphasized Anaheim’s strengths, including its location, attractions, hotel community, and overall destination appeal.

Ms. Wright highlighted Anaheim’s competitive advantages in attracting sports tourism, including reasonable hotel rates, a safe and walkable environment, and strong support from the local hospitality community. She noted that the qualities make Anaheim particularly attractive for youth sports and family-oriented events. She noted a series of major upcoming international sporting events that will provide significant exposure for Anaheim over the next decade, including FIFA-related events, the Women’s Volleyball World Championships, Olympic competitions at the Honda Center, and future Rugby World Cups. She emphasized that the events would enhance Anaheim’s visibility on the global stage, strengthen the City’s brand recognition, and create long-term opportunities to attract additional sporting events and visitors.

DISCUSSION: Mayor Aitken thanked Ms. Wright for the presentation and enthusiasm about Anaheim’s growing sports tourism portfolio. She highlighted the value of attracting a diverse range of sporting events.

Council Member Meeks asked whether event organizers consider the size and accessibility of the local attendee market when selecting host destinations. She noted that certain events, such as major gaming tournaments, benefit not only from participant attendance but also from large numbers of spectators and local attendees who purchase tickets. She inquired whether Anaheim’s population base and regional market are significant factors in attracting sports and Esports events.

Ms. Wright confirmed that the local attendee market is a significant factor for many events, including Esports, gaming, and youth sports tournaments. She noted that Anaheim and the surrounding region provide a strong built-in audience, allowing event organizers to attract both local participants and spectators as well as visitors from outside the area. She added that the existing demand makes Anaheim a more attractive and competitive destination because organizers can rely on strong attendance without depending solely on long-distance travel.

In response to Council Member Meeks, Ms. Wright stated that Anaheim’s strong local and regional market is a key selling point when competing for events. She explained that while Anaheim may not always be the lowest-cost destination, staff emphasized that event organizers often realize savings through stronger attendance, reduced marketing efforts, and higher registration numbers.

Executive Director Morton added that the drive market is roughly 20 million people.

Council Member Meeks inquired if there was a strong market, outside of the Convention Center, for dedicated sports facilities that would impact sports tourism events.

Ms. Wright stated that there is substantial demand for youth and amateur sports facilities in Anaheim, particularly for soccer, baseball, and softball events. She noted that event organizers frequently inquire about access to local parks and sports fields, and indicated that available facilities could likely be utilized every weekend due to the strong demand for sports tournaments and related activities.

Council Member Meeks noted that while neighboring cities have developed sports complexes, Anaheim possesses unique advantages through its existing visitor infrastructure, including hotels and hospitality amenities located near potential event venues. She stated that staff have been asked to City Council Minutes of April 7, 2026

evaluate the financial feasibility and potential benefits of developing additional sports facilities in Anaheim and indicated that information such as the current demand for sports tourism will help inform those discussions.

Council Member Balius inquired if the Convention Center was set up to handle the bandwidth for an e-gaming convention.

Ms. Wright confirmed that the Convention Center could support an e-gaming convention. Executive Director Morton added that the Anaheim Convention Center is well-positioned from a technology and connectivity standpoint to host a wide range of events, including esports and gaming competitions.

He noted that the Convention Center has substantial bandwidth capacity and technological infrastructure, allowing it to accommodate virtually any event-related technology requirements and remain competitive in attracting large-scale, technology-driven events.

In response to Council Member Balius, Ms. Wright agreed that there may be opportunities to further utilize sports facilities and noted that event organizers generally understand and expect to pay costs associated with venue rentals, maintenance, and operational support. She explained that tournament organizers and rights holders typically account for facility upkeep, staffing, and event execution expenses as part of their event budgets, helping to offset the costs of hosting such events.

Council Member Balius asked whether the City charges additional fees beyond standard field rental costs when sports leagues or tournament organizers use City athletic facilities. He inquired about which types of athletic fields are most in demand for sports tourism and tournament activity, asking whether soccer, baseball, softball, football, or other sports represent the strongest market demand.

Ms. Wright explained that the demand is dependent on the season. She noted that soccer, baseball, and softball are the top sports.

Council Member Kurtz commented on the significant presence of youth sports participants and families staying in Anaheim hotels during tournament and convention events, noting that many attendees are local to Orange County but still choose to stay overnight. She asked what strategies and efforts are being undertaken to further expand and attract youth sports events and tourism to Anaheim.

Ms. Wright explained that youth sports events are marketed as family experiences rather than single- day competitions. She noted that the organizers encourage participants and their families to stay overnight and enjoy Anaheim’s amenities, creating memorable experiences beyond the sporting event itself. She stated that the approach helps increase hotel stays, visitor spending, and overall tourism activity while enhancing the experience for participating families.

In response to Council Member Kurtz, Ms. Wright noted that youth sports tourism was one of the first market segments to return following the pandemic and had previously shifted to destinations that remained open for events. She shared that youth sports are a highly resilient and dependable market segment, explaining that while it may not generate the highest hotel rates or revenues compared to some other event types, it consistently attracts participants and visitors and provides a stable source of tourism activity for the City.

Council Member Maahs inquired if there is growth in any other sports besides soccer, baseball, and softball.

Ms. Wright stated that, outside of Convention Center events, the strongest demand for City park facilities generally comes from traditional field sports. She noted that within the Anaheim Convention City Council Minutes of April 7, 2026

Center, there was significant growth in volleyball and basketball events, with continued strong demand for both sports. She reported that ongoing growth in cheer and dance competitions, which remain popular event categories despite presenting some operational challenges for Convention Center facilities. She stated that youth sports markets continue to expand and represent an important source of event activity and tourism.

In response to Council Member Maahs, Ms. Wright reported that Anaheim has hosted adaptive sports events, including wheelchair basketball and wheelchair rugby competitions. She noted interest in attracting more adaptive sports events in the future but explained that these events often require greater financial assistance and incentives than are currently available. She expressed support for expanding opportunities in this area and acknowledged the value adaptive sports events bring to participants, families, and the community.

In response to Mayor Aitken, Ms. Wright stated that Anaheim has not directly hosted or organized an invitational and noted that doing so would require significant logistical coordination, including securing courts, recruiting teams, and attracting high-level competition. She did not recommend that the City take on the responsibility of hosting and organizing the event independently.

Mayor Pro Tem Leon thanked staff for the presentation and remarked that learning the economic impact of USA Volleyball events was comparable to that of the NAMM Show was both surprising and encouraging. He requested clarification on Visit Anaheim’s role in attracting sports events to Anaheim, specifically whether their responsibilities primarily involve serving as a liaison between event organizers and the Convention Center. He requested additional information about how staff identify and utilize available Convention Center space, including underused halls, to maximize facility usage and attract additional events.

Ms. Wright explained that she directly books sports-related events into the Anaheim Convention Center. She reported that after identifying potential events, she coordinates with Convention Center personnel to review dates, available space, and whether the event is a good fit for the facility. She noted that once preliminary approval is received, she works directly with event organizers to negotiate and develop the booking. She explained that the Convention Center team becomes formally involved when a lease is requested. She noted that she has access to view available Convention Center space and can identify opportunities to utilize underused areas, while coordinating closely with Convention Center staff before any event is scheduled.

Mayor Pro Tem Leon requested clarification on Visit Anaheim’s role in coordinating event logistics after a potential client expressed interest in booking space at the Anaheim Convention Center.

Ms. Wright explained that her role is primarily focused on event sales, recruitment, and high-level coordination. She stated that she provides general information about Convention Center capabilities, detailed operational discussions, such as technology, internet bandwidth, and other technical requirements, are referred directly to the appropriate Convention Center experts and service providers.

Mayor Pro Tem Leon thanked staff for the presentation and raised the possibility of hosting community events or public watch parties in connection with upcoming international sporting events such as the FIFA World Cup. He referenced prior discussions regarding licensing requirements and fees associated with publicly showing matches and asked whether such requirements would apply to free community events. He suggested exploring opportunities to partner with Visit Anaheim and other stakeholders to create community-focused events that could celebrate major sporting competitions, enhance local engagement, and potentially support sports tourism efforts. He expressed appreciation for staff’s work promoting Anaheim as a sports destination.

City Council Minutes of April 7, 2026

Informational item; no formal action taken by the City Council.

PUBLIC COMMENTS (non-agenda items): None
COUNCIL AGENDA SETTING:

Council Member Rubalcava requested a presentation on traffic conditions on Santiago Canyon Road including an analysis of prior studies and potential solutions such as roadway widening and congestion mitigation strategies. She requested that the meeting be adjourned in memory of Los Angeles County Deputy Sheriff Levi Vargas, Alberto Viveros Piedra, and Andrew Joseph Sanchez.

Council Member Meeks requested a recognition for Public Works employee Jose Sanchez for assisting the family involved in the March 3rd incident on Lincoln and Olive Street.

Mayor Pro Tem Leon requested follow-up information on the memorial bench for Mia Mejia, which was not permitted for placement in their cul-de-sac due to code enforcement restrictions. He requested options to explore installing the bench or a replica in a City park in her memory and for mental health resources. He specified exploring options to memorialize Mia by placing a commemorative bench or similar tribute in a City park.

ADJOURNMENT: With no further business before the Council, Mayor Aitken adjourned the City Council in memory of Alberto Viveros Piedra, Andrew Joseph Sanchez, Marc “Tiger” Trejo, Los Angeles County Deputy Sheriff Levi Vargas, and Jennifer Alejandra Loera-Zarco, at 9:05 p.m.

Respectfully submitted,
Theresa Bass, CMC
City Clerk