Cities Index.
2. Appendix to Minutes (04/21/2026)

Anaheim City Council
July 14, 2026

Document
2. Appendix to Minutes (04/21/2026)
Meeting
July 14, 2026
Body
Anaheim City Council
Original file
115.0 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on local.anaheim.net. That file is the official record.

Susana Barrios
From: Tanya Navarro <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April20, 20265:22PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 Anaheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

TanyaNavarro
SantaAna, California92707
2 Susana Barrios
From: Ramon Vargas <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April20, 20266:50PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 Anaheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

RamonVargas
SantaAna, California92701
2 Susana Barrios
From: Thomas Hunt-Gibbon <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, April20, 20267:02PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 Anaheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

ThomasHunt-Gibbon
SantaAna, California92704
2 Susana Barrios
From: Yesenia Juarez <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April20, 20268:00PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 Anaheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

YeseniaJuarez
Tustin, California92780
2 Susana Barrios
From: Christopher Pantoja <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, April20, 20268:19PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 Anaheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

ChristopherPantoja
SantaAna, California92703
2 Susana Barrios
From: andrea briseno <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April20, 20268:26PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 Anaheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity. andreabriseno
anaheim, California92804
2 Susana Barrios
From: MarinaSalmon <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April20, 20268:28PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 Anaheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

MarinaSalmon
SantaAna , California92701
2 Susana Barrios
From: OmarDominguez <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April20, 20268:45PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 Anaheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

OmarDominguez
SantaAna, California92704
2 Susana Barrios
From: Veronica Jimenez-fernandez <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, April20, 20269:11PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 Anaheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

VeronicaJimenez-fernandez
Orange, California92868-0000
2 Susana Barrios
From: Marlina Balcazar <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April20, 20269:31PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 Anaheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

MarlinaBalcazar
Anaheim, California92801
2 Susana Barrios
From: Stephanie Trujillo <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, April20, 202610:11PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 Anaheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

StephanieTrujillo
SouthGate, California902805
2 Susana Barrios
From: MariaRuvalcaba <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April20, 202610:19PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 Anaheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

MariaRuvalcaba
SantaAna, California92704
2 Susana Barrios
From: MelinaArrazola <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April20, 202610:25PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 Anaheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

MelinaArrazola
SantaAna, California92703
2 Susana Barrios
From: Adnaly Muniz <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April20, 202610:25PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 Anaheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

AdnalyMuniz
Anaheim, California92805
2 Susana Barrios
From: Sabrina Barrot <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April20, 202611:50PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 Anaheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

SabrinaBarrot
SantaAna, California92705
2 Susana Barrios
From: Marianne Almero <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 20263:01AM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 Anaheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

MarianneAlmero
Anaheim, California92806
2 Susana Barrios
From: ChrisAraujo <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 20266:40AM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 Anaheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

ChrisAraujo
SantaAna, California92701
2 Susana Barrios
From: Crystal Ordonez <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 20267:01AM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 Anaheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

CrystalOrdonez
SantaAna , California92701
2 Susana Barrios
From: GrantKobayashi <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 20269:55AM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 Anaheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

GrantKobayashi
Orange, California92865
2 Susana Barrios
From: AshleePineda <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 202610:09AM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 Anaheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

AshleePineda
Tustin, California92780
2 Susana Barrios
From: KarenHernandez <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 202610:13AM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 Anaheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

KarenHernandez
Anaheim, California92805
2 Susana Barrios
From: Shanna Somers <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 202611:02AM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 Anaheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

ShannaSomers
Tustin, California92780
2 Susana Barrios
From: Katherine Roark-Schwartz <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, April21, 202611:04AM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 Anaheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

KatherineRoark-Schwartz
RanchoSantaMargarita, California92688
2 Susana Barrios
From: Stephanie Hopkins <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, April21, 202611:08AM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 Anaheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

StephanieHopkins
Anaheim, California92808
2 Susana Barrios
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: 08AM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 Anaheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity. 2 Susana Barrios
From: Alexander Rudenshiold <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, April21, 202611:09AM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 Anaheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

AlexanderRudenshiold
Irvine, California92617
2 Susana Barrios
From: HaleyHorton <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] Automated surveillance systems - consent calendar item7 Youdon'to?engetemailfrom Learnwhythisisimportantat
h?ps://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIden?ca?on \]
Warning: Thisemailoriginated fromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropena?achments unlessyou recognize thesenderandareexpec?ngthemessage.

Anaheimcitycouncilandcitysta,
Pleasebeawarethatthesurveillance systemsbeingoutinbycity’swithFlockorwithALPRarenotsecure, violateour rights, andwillbeusedbybadactorslikeICEtohuntdownCalifornians. Donotviolateourrightsto “preventcrime” becausethecrimewillalreadyhavebeencommi?edagainstallofus, andwehavenotvotedtogiveupourrightsthis way. WhatAnaheimdoesaectsalltheOCbecause ofthebusinesses andentertainment locatedinthecity. Pleasedo notcon?nuedownanexpensive andmistakenpathofillegalsurveillance.

Thankyou,
HaleyHorton
1 Susana Barrios
From: Natalie Ochoa <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 202611:27AM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 Anaheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

NatalieOchoa
Anaheim, California92801
2 Susana Barrios
From: KatieDillard <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] Please readallowed_PublicComment: Votenoonadding cameras and surveillance inOC
Youdon'toftengetemailfrom Learnwhythisisimportant
Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

Iamwriting todaybecause Ihavebeenmadeaware thatititstheintention oftheAnaheim City Council tovoteonadding 72ALPRcameras (Flock-style) toyoursurvillance network inthecityand throughout Orange County. Ivehemently saythatthecommunity doesnotwantthesecameras and askyoutovotenoonthisaddition. These cameras andthenetworks thatsupport themarenot secure andcreatemoresafetyandliability issues forthecommunity andyouasacouncil thanany benefit theymayhaveforsurvelliance. Thefacevalidityoftheiruseisn'teventhereasjusthaving videos doesn'timprove public safety. Please useanyadditional funds forsafety services toincrease services topeople livinginpoverty orenhancing community safety patrols focused onwatchdogging aggressive useofforceinappropriately bycurrent safetyworkers. Useanyfunding saved toprovdie enhanced training tocurrent safety staffaround mental health deescalation orcommunity focused relationship andengagement support. Anything thatisevidence based andscience backed for actually creating increased safety inourOCcommunity butnotincreased camera survelliance that's onlybenefitistolinethepockets ofthesystem developers, furtherremove hyperlocal safety efforts ANDdecrease support fromreal, trained human beings needed inourcommunity. thank you,
concerned ocresident
1 Susana Barrios
From: Bulmaro Vicente <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 202611:29AM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] PublicComment Item7 - Motorola Automated License PlateReader Attachments: 4.21.26Chispa Item7 - LetterofOpposition.pdf Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

Hi,
PleasefindChispa'sletterofoppositionforItem7
InSolidarity,
Boomer
Policy andPolitical Director | Chispa
e: boomer@chispaoc. orgc:
1505E17thStreet Suite 117Santa Ana, CA92705
Chispa isbuilding apolitical home foryoung Latinxs inOrange County! Please consider making a donation tohelp usbuild our casita. Chispa isaproject ofTides Advocacy, a501c4 non-profit organization.
1 April 21, 2026
Mayor Ashleigh Aitken and Members of City Council
City of Anaheim
200 S. Anaheim Blvd.

Anaheim, CA 92805
Re: Item 7 - Opposition to Motorola Automated License Plate Reader Dear Mayor Aitkens and Members of the Anaheim City Council, On behalf of Chispa, we write to express our strong opposition to Item #07, which proposes expanding the City of Anaheim’s (City) Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) program through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions.

This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities.

ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and well-documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country.1
Anaheim has experienced large-scale immigration enforcement actions over the past year, where we have seen ICE abduct members of our community. We appreciate the City’s efforts to support residents through initiatives such as the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo. However, expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City’s immigrant families at greater risk.

Investing in surveillance technology not only sends the wrong message to residents, particularly immigrant communities, who are already vulnerable but it is at odds with the City’s values. At a time when immigrant communities are facing heightened fear due to increased enforcement activity, this item risks deepening harm,eroding trust between residents and local government, and being used as a tool by outside agencies like ICE.

We urge the City Council to reject Item #07 and instead prioritize community- based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents.

Best,
Bulmaro Vicente,
Policy and Political Director
1 Khari Johnson and Mohamed Al Elew, “California Police Are Illegally Sharing License Plate Reader Data with ICE and Border Patrol,” CalMatters, June 13, 2025,
https:// calmatters.org/economy/technology/2025/06/california-police-sharing-license-plate-reader-data/ (accessed April 21, 2026).

Susana Barrios
From: HaleyHorton <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 202611:41AM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingbecausewhathappensatAnaheim:affectsallofOCsimplybecauseoftheworld famousvenueslocatedinAnaheim. IstronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionofthe CityofAnaheim’sproposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchase of72additionalcamerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeing usedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathways foraccess byfederal agencies such asU.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the useofthird-partyvendorsandregionaldata-sharingplatformsintroducesrealandwelldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 Anaheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

HaleyHorton
CostaMesa, California92627
2 Susana Barrios
From: KarlaNavarro <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 202611:41AM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 Anaheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

KarlaNavarro
SantaAna , California92707
2 Susana Barrios
From: Ernesto Gutierrez <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, April21, 202611:43AM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 Anaheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

ErnestoGutierrez
Anaheim, California92805
2 Susana Barrios
From: Andrea Diaz <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 202611:46AM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 Anaheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

AndreaDiaz
SantaAna, California92706
2 Susana Barrios
From: Katherine Derrington <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, April21, 202611:54AM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 Anaheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

KatherineDerrington
LagunaNiguel, California92677
2 Susana Barrios
From: Lauren Fisher <info@mylagunaoffice. com>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 202611:58AM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Youdon'toftengetemailfrominfo@mylagunaoffice. com. Learnwhythisisimportant Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the useofthird-partyvendorsandregionaldata-sharingplatformsintroducesrealandwelldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 Anaheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

LaurenFisher
[email protected]
LagunaBeach, California92651
2 Susana Barrios
From: Katherine Derrington <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 2026
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] Prioritize SafeStreets withoutSurveillance Youdon'to?engetemailfrom Learnwhythisisimportantat
h?ps://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIden?ca?on \]
Warning: Thisemailoriginated fromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropena?achments unlessyou recognize thesenderandareexpec?ngthemessage.

DearAnaheimCityCouncil,
Iamwri?ngtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposed expansion oftheCityofAnaheim’sproposedAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72addi?onalcamerasfromMotorolaSolu?ons. Idonotsupporttaxpayer dollarsbeingusedinthisway.

Thisproposalrepresentsasignicant expansion ofsurveillance acrosstheCityandCountyofOrange. ALPRsystemsraise seriousconcerns overtheviola?onofprivacy, civilliber?es, andthesafetyofimmigrant communi?es.

ALPRtechnology hashistorically enableddatasharingacrossjurisdic?ons, crea?ngpathways foraccessbyfederal agencies suchasU.S. Immigra?onandCustomsEnforcement (ICE). Evenwhenci?es donotintendtoshareinforma?on directlywithICE, theuseofthird-partyvendorsandregionaldata-sharingpla?ormsintroduces realandwelldocumented risksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintended accessbyoutsideagencies inmunicipali?esacrossthe StateofCalifornia andCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seortstosupportresidents thathavebeenimpacted byimmigra?onenforcement ac?ons. Isupport theAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimCon?goprograms. Expanding surveillance infrastructure likethis undermines andcontradicts thespiritofthoseeortsasALPRtechnology putstheCity’simmigrant familiesatgreater risk.

Anaheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltopriori?zecommunity-basedapproaches topublic safetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - rejectItem #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomated LicensePlateReaders intheCity.

Thankyouforyourconsidera?on,
KatherineDerrington
1 Susana Barrios
From: EllisseGarcia <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 202612:06PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 Anaheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

EllisseGarcia
Placentia, California92870
2 Susana Barrios
From: Yesenia Altamirano <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, April21, 202612:19PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 Anaheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

YeseniaAltamirano
Anaheim, California92805
2 Susana Barrios
From: KristiHetchler <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 202612:22PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 Anaheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

KristiHetchler
LagunaNiguel, California92677
2 Susana Barrios
From: Fatima <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday,
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] Consent calendar item #7
Youdon'toftengetemailfrom Learnwhythisisimportant
Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

MynameisFatimaandIwritehereasanOCresidenturgingthecounciltoopposeconsentcalendar item #7. AcrossCalifornia, policehaveillegallysharedlicenseplatedatawithICEandBorderPatrol, thereforeimplementingALPRsputsmuchoftheAnaheimcommunityatrisk. Thisautomatedticketing alsofurthersstarkracialdisparitiesincriminalizinglow-incomeLatino, Black, andimmigrant communities, asshownbyProPublica'sChicagocasestudies. Wecanandshouldprioritizesaferstreets withoutincreasingsurveillance--forexample, thiscouldlooklikeimplementing speedbumps, rethinking urbanplanning, andincreasingavailabilityofpublictransportation. 1 Susana Barrios
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: 12:31PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 Anaheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity. 2 Susana Barrios
From: MiaVerdin <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 202612:31PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 Anaheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

MiaVerdin
SantaAna, California92705
2 Susana Barrios
From: Felicity Figueroa <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, April21, 202612:42PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 Anaheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

FelicityFigueroa
Irvine, California92604-3003
2 Susana Barrios
From: PerlaGonzales <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 202612:51PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 naheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

PerlaGonzales
[email protected]
SantaAna, California92703
2 Susana Barrios
From: Rachel Dinah <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 20261:09PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 Anaheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

RachelDinah
SantaAna, California92701
2 Susana Barrios
From: Rebecca Pasillas <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 20261:18PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 Anaheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

RebeccaPasillas
SantaAna, California92701
2 Susana Barrios
From: Donna Malamud <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 20261:28PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 Anaheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

DonnaMalamud
Venice, California90291
2 Susana Barrios
From: JayC <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 20261:43PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 Anaheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

JayC
LkForest , California92630
2 Susana Barrios
From: GraceSuh <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 20262:16PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 Anaheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

GraceSuh
Irvine, California92602
2 Susana Barrios
From: Susan Burgess <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 20262:19PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 Anaheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

SusanBurgess
Tustin, California92780
2 Susana Barrios
From: Natalie Camarena Lopez <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, April21, 20262:21PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 Anaheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

NatalieCamarenaLopez
SantaAna, California92704
2 Susana Barrios
From: IvonPeña <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 20262:30PM
To: Public Comment
Cc: Angeles Ochoa Carmona; Gustavo Castillo
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] Opposition LetterforItem7 – Motorola Automated License PlateReader Attachments: 4.21.26OCCORD Item7 - LetterofOpposition.pdf Youdon'[email protected]. Learnwhythisisimportant Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

DearAnaheimCityCouncil,
PleaseseeattachedOCCORD’sletterofoppositionregardingItem7, theMotorolaAutomatedLicense PlateReaderitem.

Thankyouforyourtimeandconsideration.

InSolidarity,
Ivon
IvonPeña
[email protected]
https://www.occord.org/
1505E17thSt. Suite122, SantaAna, CA92705
Executive Director
1 April 21, 2026
Mayor Ashleigh Aitken and Members of City Council
City of Anaheim
200 S. Anaheim Blvd.

Anaheim, CA 92805
Re: Item 7 - Opposition to Motorola Automated License Plate Reader Dear Mayor Aitkens and Members of the Anaheim City Council, On behalf of Orange County Communities Organized for Responsible Development (OCCORD), we write to express our strong opposition to Item #07, which proposes expanding the City of Anaheim’ s (City) Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) program through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions.

This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities.

ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and well-documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country.1
Anaheim has experienced large-scale immigration enforcement actions over the past year, where we have seen ICE abduct members of our community. We appreciate the City’s efforts to support residents through initiatives such as the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo. However, expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City’s immigrant families at greater risk.

Investing in surveillance technology not only sends the wrong message to residents, particularly immigrant communities, who are already vulnerable but it is at odds with the City’s values. At a time when immigrant communities are facing heightened fear due to increased enforcement activity, this item risks deepening harm,eroding trust between residents and local government, and being used as a tool by outside agencies like ICE.

We urge the City Council to reject Item #07 and instead prioritize community-based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents.

Best,
Ivon Pena,
Executive Director
1 Khari Johnson and Mohamed Al Elew, “California Police Are Illegally Sharing License Plate Reader Data with ICE and Border Patrol,” CalMatters, June 13, 2025,
https:// calmatters.org/economy/technology/2025/06/california-police-sharing-license-plate-reader-data/ (accessed April 21, 2026).

Susana Barrios
From: betsyLobos <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 20262:42PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 naheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity. betsyLobos
[email protected]
SantaAna, California92706
2 Susana Barrios
From: EvelynGarcia <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 20262:48PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 naheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

EvelynGarcia
[email protected]
Anaheim , California92801
2 Susana Barrios
From: AdrianStephen <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 20262:58PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 naheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

AdrianStephen
[email protected]
Anaheim, California92805
2 Susana Barrios
From: sparklemoonpie@gmail. com <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, April21, 20263:21PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectALPR (Automated License PlateReader) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 naheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity. [email protected]
2 Susana Barrios
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, April21, 20263:24PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 naheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity. [email protected]
2 Susana Barrios
From: KarenG. Hernández <karen@ocrapidresponse. org>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 20263:33PM
To: Public Comment
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; KelseyGordon; Sandra DeAnda; carolinamendezoc@gmail. com
Subject:\[ PublicComment - Agenda Item #7
Follow UpFlag: Follow up
FlagStatus: Completed
Youdon'[email protected]. Learnwhythisisimportant Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

DearMayor andCouncil Members,
MynameisKaren Hernández, Managing Director ofOCRapidResponse Network, andanAnaheim resident inDistrict4. Iamwriting toexpress mySTRONGoppositiontoAgendaItem7onthe consent calendar, whichwouldauthorize over $736,000toexpand Automated LicensePlateReader ALPR) surveillance inAnaheim andacross theregion.

Thisproposal wouldsignificantly expand Anaheim’sALPRprogram byadding 72newcameras, deepening theCity’sintegration intoadangerous andcontroversial regional data-sharing network acrossOrange County. Thisisnotasmallupgrade; itisamajorexpansion ofsurveillance infrastructure.

ALPRsystems collect dataonevery vehicle thatpasses by, notjustthoseconnected tocrimes.

Research shows thatover99% ofthisdataisunrelated toanycriminal investigation, meaning the system primarily tracks ordinary residents without suspicion orconsent.

Thisexpansion raisesserious concerns aboutprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrant communities. ALPRsystems aredesigned tosharedataacross jurisdictions, andthatdatadoesnot staylocal. Across California, lawenforcement agencies havealready sharedALPRdatawithfederal immigration authorities, including ICE, inviolation ofstatelaw, including documented cases herein Southern California.

Thatmeans thisisnotjustaboutlocalpolicing—itisaboutbuilding infrastructure thatcanandhas beenillegallyusedforimmigration enforcement.

EvenifthatisnottheCity’sintent, thesesystems relyonthird-partyvendors andregional platforms thatenable broadaccess. Oncethisdataiscollected, theCitycannot fullycontrol howitisusedor whoultimately accesses it. Expanding thissystem increases theriskofmisuse andundermines public trust—especially atatimewhenAnaheim hastakenimportant steps tosupport immigrant communities through efforts liketheContigo Fund.
1 Formany residents, thisisnottheoretical. Surveillance changes behavior. People avoidwork, school, healthcare, andplacesofworship whentheybelieve theirmovements arebeing tracked. Thatmakes thisnotjustaprivacy issue, butapublicsafety issue. Timeandagain, inthecommunity workOCRRN engages in, weseetherealimpact ofharmful policies likesurveillance layered ontop ofthedailyattacks immigrant communities already face. Families arenavigating fearnotjustfrom federal enforcement, butfromsystems thatquietly tracktheirmovements andcreate uncertainty aboutwhomayhaveaccess totheirinformation. These technologies don’texistinavacuum—they deepen mistrust, discourage people fromaccessing essential services, andmakeitharderfor communities tofeelsafeintheirownneighborhoods.

Thisexpansion willnotmeaningfully improve safety—itwillonlyexpand monitoring, andthosearenot thesame.

Whiletheproposal relies inpartongrants anddonations, itstillcommits theCitytolong-termcosts anddeeper dependence onsurveillance technology.

Anaheim MUSTrejectthisexpansion andinstead investincommunity-based safety strategies that buildtrustandprotect therightsanddignity ofallresidents, especially thosemostvulnerable to illegalICEenforcement actions.

Ataminimum, theCityshould require:

Explicit prohibitions onsharingALPRdatawithfederal immigration enforcement Strictlimitsondataretention andaccess
Independent auditsandpublic reporting
Meaningful community inputbefore expanding surveillance systems Untiltheseprotections areinplace, approving thisitemispremature.

Forthesereasons, IurgeyoutovotenoonAgendaItem7.

Thankyouforyourtimeandconsideration.

Sincerely,
KarenHernández
References:
https://reason.com/2026/04/16/san-joses-creepy-and-deeply-intrusive-alpr-camera-system-isunconstitutional-a-new-lawsuit-says/ https://calmatters.org/economy/technology/2025/06/california-police-sharing-license-platereader-data/ https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2019/03/heres-why-you-cant-trust-what-cops-and-companiesclaim-about-automated-license https://www.aclunorcal.org/news/alameda-rejects-surveillance-deal-company-tied-ice/ https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2025/11/how-cops-are-using-flock-safetys-alpr-network-surveilprotesters-and-activists 2 https://pasadenanow.com/main/residents-raise-privacy-equity-concerns-over-police-use-offlock-cameras Karen G. Hernández
Pronouns: (She/Ella)
Managing Director
Orange County Rapid Response Network
www.ocrapidresponse. org
Email: karen@ocrapidresponse. org

THIS MESSAGE ISINTENDED ONLY FOR THEUSEOFTHEINDIVIDUAL ORENTITY TO

WHICH ITISADDRESSED AND MAYCONTAIN INFORMATION THAT ISPRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL AND EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER APPLICABLE LAW. IFTHE

READER OFTHIS MESSAGE ISNOTTHEINTENDED RECIPIENT ORTHEEMPLOYEE OR

AGENT RESPONSIBLE FORDELIVERING THE MESSAGE TOTHEINTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU

ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION ORCOPYING OFTHIS COMMUNICATION ISSTRICTLY PROHIBITED.
3 Susana Barrios
From: ErinMoncure <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 20263:50PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 naheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

ErinMoncure
[email protected]
LakeForest, California92630-5234
2 Susana Barrios
From: Angeles Ochoa Carmona <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 20264:05PM
To: Public Comment
Cc: IvonPeña; Gustavo Castillo
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] Opposition LetterforItem7 – Motorola Automated License PlateReader Attachments: Opposition LetterforItem7 – Motorola Automated License PlateReader.pdf Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

Hello,
PleaseseemyattachedpubliccommentonItem7fortoday'scouncilmeeting. Thankyou.

Best,
AngelesOchoaCarmona
DigitalOrganizer
[email protected]
www.occord.org
1505E17thSt, Suite122, SantaAna, CA92705
1 Re: Item 7 - Opposition to Motorola Automated License Plate Reader Dear Mayor Aitken and Members of the Anaheim City Council, My name is Angeles Ochoa and I am the Digital Organizer with Orange County Communities Organized for Responsible Development (OCCORD). I am writing to express my opposition to Item #7, which proposes expanding the City’s Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) program through the purchase of 72 additional cameras.

I want to acknowledge that public safety is important to all of us. However, expanding surveillance is not the solution. This proposal would significantly increase the monitoring of residents across Anaheim without adequately addressing the serious risks it brings to privacy, civil liberties, and community trust.

ALPR systems are not just cameras—they are data collection tools. They track where people go, store that information and often share it across agencies and jurisdictions. Even when there are policies in place, there are well-documented concerns about how this data can be accessed indirectly by federal agencies, including U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), through third-party vendors and data-sharing systems.

This is especially concerning given the real experiences of immigrant families in Anaheim. Over the past year, our community has witnessed increased immigration enforcement actions that have caused fear and harm. Expanding surveillance infrastructure in this context does not make people feel safer, instead it makes them feel watched and vulnerable.

The City has taken steps to support immigrant communities through efforts like the Anaheim Contigo program and the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund. However, expanding ALPR technology undermines those efforts by creating conditions that can put the same communities at greater risk and erode trust in local government.

Public safety should be rooted in trust, transparency and community investment, not expanded surveillance. There are alternative, community- based approaches that prioritize safety while respecting the dignity and rights of all residents.

For these reasons, I urge the City Council to reject Item #7 and instead invest in solutions that truly strengthen and protect our community.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Best,
Angeles Ochoa
Digital Organizer
Susana Barrios
From: CarlosA <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 20264:24PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 naheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

CarlosA
[email protected]
Anaheim, California92804
2 Susana Barrios
From: KarlaOrtiz <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 20267:20PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 naheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

KarlaOrtiz
[email protected]
Anaheim, California92805
2 Susana Barrios
From: Elizabeth Zuniga <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 20267:38PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamaresidentofAnaheimwhoiswritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposed expansionoftheCityofAnaheim’sproposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additionalcamerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupport taxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement ( ICE). Even when cities donot intend toshare information directly with ICE, the useofthird-partyvendorsandregionaldata-sharingplatformsintroducesrealandwelldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 naheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

ElizabethZuniga
[email protected]
CA
2 Susana Barrios
From: Catherine Goldenberg <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, April21, 20267:45PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] NotoAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 naheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

Thankyouforyourtimeandconsideration,
C.G.

CatherineGoldenberg
[email protected]
Tustin, California92782
2 Susana Barrios
From: ToddGoldenberg <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 20267:45PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 naheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

ToddGoldenberg
[email protected]
Tustin, California92782
2 Susana Barrios
From: ReinaMarchi <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 20268:03PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 naheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

ReinaMarchi
[email protected]
Anaheim, California92801
2 Susana Barrios
From: daniella brooks <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 20268:27PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 naheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity. daniellabrooks
[email protected]
SantaFeSprings, California90670
2 Susana Barrios
From: daniella brooks <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 20268:28PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 naheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity. daniellabrooks
[email protected]
SantaFeSprings, California90670
2 Susana Barrios
From: Andrea Sosa <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 20268:39PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 naheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

AndreaSosa
[email protected]
SantaAna, California92707
2 Susana Barrios
From: KarynPhilhower <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 20268:44PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 naheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

KarynPhilhower
[email protected]
Orange, California92869
2 Susana Barrios
From: Genesis Luviano <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 20268:46PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 naheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

GenesisLuviano
[email protected]
1338SBakerSt
SantaAna, California92707
2 Susana Barrios
From: DaliaZidan <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 20268:58PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
ToMayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 naheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

DaliaZidan
[email protected]
Anaheim, California92808
2 Susana Barrios
From: Janielle Rollins <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 20269:08PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 naheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

JanielleRollins
[email protected]
Irvine, California92604
2 Susana Barrios
From: Christopher Pham <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 20269:09PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 naheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

ChristopherPham
[email protected]
Anaheim, California92807
2 Susana Barrios
From: Elizabeth Wiest <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 20269:12PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 naheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

ElizabethWiest
[email protected]
Orange, California92865
2 Susana Barrios
From: JoseLopez <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 20269:51PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 naheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

JoseLopez
[email protected]
Anaheim , California92805
2 Susana Barrios
From: Victoria Kim <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 20269:57PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 naheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

VictoriaKim
[email protected]
Irvine, California92602
2 Susana Barrios
From: Leana deLeon <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 202610:25PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 naheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

LeanadeLeon
[email protected]
Westminster, California92685
2 Susana Barrios
From: Emanuel Lucas <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 202610:52PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] RejectAutomated License PlateReader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimCityCouncilAnaheimCityCouncil,
To: MayorAitkenandtheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtostronglyopposeItem07, theproposedexpansionoftheCityofAnaheim’s proposedAutomatedLicensePlateReader (ALPR) throughthepurchaseof72additional camerasfromMotorolaSolutions. Idonotsupporttaxpayerdollarsbeingusedinthisway.

ThisproposalrepresentsasignificantexpansionofsurveillanceacrosstheCityandCounty ofOrange. ALPRsystemsraiseseriousconcernsovertheviolationofprivacy, civilliberties, andthesafetyofimmigrantcommunities.

ALPRtechnologyhashistoricallyenableddatasharingacrossjurisdictions, creating pathwaysforaccessbyfederalagenciessuchasU.S. ImmigrationandCustoms Enforcement (ICE). EvenwhencitiesdonotintendtoshareinformationdirectlywithICE, the use ofthird-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and welldocumentedrisksofindirectaccessandhasledtounintendedaccessbyoutsideagenciesin municipalitiesacrosstheStateofCaliforniaandCountry.

IapplaudtheCity’seffortstosupportresidentsthathavebeenimpactedbyimmigration enforcementactions. IsupporttheAnaheimLegalDefenseFundandAnaheimContigo programs. Expandingsurveillanceinfrastructurelikethisunderminesandcontradictsthespirit ofthoseeffortsasALPRtechnologyputstheCity’simmigrantfamiliesatgreaterrisk. 1 naheimresidentsdeserverealsupport. IurgetheCityCounciltoprioritizecommunity-based approachestopublicsafetythatrespecttherights, dignity, andsafetyofallresidents - reject Item #07andvoteNOonexpandingAutomatedLicensePlateReadersintheCity.

EmanuelLucas
[email protected]
Anaheim, California92802
2 Susana Barrios
From: JamesCampbell <james@TheDiamondGroup. net>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 20262:22PM
To: AshleighAitken <[email protected]>; NatalieMeeks <[email protected]>; CarlosA. Leon [email protected]>; RyanBalius <[email protected]>; NatalieRubalcava <[email protected]>; NormaC.

Kurtz <[email protected]>; KristenMaahs <[email protected]>; BereniceBallinas <[email protected]>; MagnoliaMoreno <[email protected]>; RyanCarey <[email protected]>; CityManager [email protected]>; TedWhite <[email protected]> Cc: RayBaker <[email protected]>; HalKilshaw <[email protected]>; RogerFaubel <[email protected]>; Kent Saunders <[email protected]>
Subject: \[EXTERNAL\] RelativetoItem29ontonight’sagenda… Youdon'[email protected]. Learnwhythisisimportant Warning: This email originated from outside theCityofAnaheim. Donotclick links oropen attachments unless you recognize thesender andareexpecting themessage.

Goodafternoon. PleaseseetheemailbelowandattachedrevisedproposalfromLamarOutdoor AdvertisingrelatedtotheNovember, 2024proposaltotheCity. Weappreciateyourleadershipand generaldiscussiononthisissueandareavailablegoingforwardtodiscussspecificsrelativetothis agendaitemandLamar’sproposal.

Best,
JamesCampbell
Subject: Revised Anaheim Public-Private Partnership Proposal – LamarAdvertising MayorAitkenandMembers oftheCityCouncil,
Please findattached Lamar Advertising’srevisedPublic-PrivatePartnershipproposal, building uponouroriginal submission fromNovember 2024.

IlThisupdated proposal outlines acomprehensive approach tomodernizing Anaheim’soutdoor advertising environment through astrategic combination ofpublicandprivate locations, alongwith theremoval ofselect surface street signage. Theprogram isdesigned toleverage advanced digital technology toenhance theCity’svisual landscape whiledelivering meaningful publicbenefits.

Through thisinitiative, Anaheim hastheopportunity toimplement aforward-thinking program that:

Generates significant, long-termrevenue fortheCity (approximately $63,750,000overthe initial30-yearterm, withthepotential toreach $85,000,000overthefulltermincludingthe mutualextension)
Enhances communication capabilities forpublic safety, emergency alerts, andcivicmessaging Supports localeconomic development, including a25% ratecarddiscountforAnaheimbasedbusinesses 1 Improves overall aesthetics bytransitioning fromlegacy signage tomodern, high-quality digital displays
Removes34existingsurfacestreetbillboardfaces, representing ameaningful private investment byLamartoreduce legacy signage andenhance theCity’svisualenvironment in exchange forthismodernization program
Beyond thefinancial impact, thisproposal reflects acontinued commitment topartnership withthe CityofAnaheim—delivering bothimmediate andlong-termvaluewhilealigning withtheCity’s broader goals foreconomic development, public engagement, andvisual improvement.

Weappreciate yourtimeandconsideration andwouldwelcome theopportunity todiscuss this revised proposal ingreater detailatyourconvenience.

Respectfully,
RayBaker
RayBaker / Vice-President & General Manager
LamarAdvertisingofLosAngeles/OrangeCounty
O: 323.933.3222 / M: 323.877.8897
1121S. BoyleAve, Ste. 201, LosAngeles, CA90023
lamar.com/losangeles
CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: Thiselectronicmessagemaycontainconfidentialorlegallyprivilegedinformationfrom LamarAdvertisingCompany. Theinformationisintendedtobefortheuseoftheindividualorentitynamedabove. Ifyou arenottheintendedrecipient, beawarethatanydisclosure, copying, distributionoruseofthecontentsofthismessageis strictlyprohibited. Ifyouhavereceivedthiselectronicmessageinerror, pleasenotifyusimmediatelybytelephone at (323) 933-3222orbyemailanddeletethismessageuncopied. 2 2026 || Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company || Los Angeles - Anaheim 1 City of Anaheim
Digital Billboard Proposal
April 20, 2026
Lamar of Los Angeles/Orange County
2026 || Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company || Los Angeles - Anaheim 2 ANAHEIM - OVERVIEW MAP
CITY OF ANAHEIM - ALL INVENTORY - OCTOBER 2024
I
WMalvemAve
ve
s
I
1 Crescent Ave !!
I
g ,, -!
OrangeA 2
Ball Rd
WCemtosAve
KatellaAve
Orangewood Ave " "'!!!
g !!
I
ChapmanAve .,

ST GARDEN
GROVE f
n
ArtesiaA\ le
Buena Park
WCommonweahAve
WValencia Or
l:
3 Lincoln 1
I) ..
0 l9
W Cerritos Ave
Stanton KatellaAve
OrengethorpeAve

SOUTHWEST

ANAHEIM
i RUSTIC LANE
I
Chapman Ave
Lampson Ave
0 " ., !! I
ii" !!
I
I
Lampson Ave
LAl\/ 7AR ) I LOS ANGELES I I .. .,..,. comllol.,.,....

E Chapman Ave
Fullerton E CommonwealthAve
WValenc;a Or
a: !!
I
Ball Rd

HERMOSA VILLAGE
WKatellaAve ..,
5' !!
I
Chapman Ave
Garden Grove
x:
f E OrangethorpeAve
91 E Romneya Or
14 alma Ave
I
Anaheim ero• ·•
1 CONVENTION
CENTER
p..naS\ san\a
So"\ I\S\

ANAHEIM (

I) RESORT
01 LampsonAve

EDNA PARK
WEST

FLORAL PARK
1 Alta Vista St "'
Placentia
Crowthe, Ave
p..• o••.,g•
linco\nM•
WKatellaAve
WalnutAve
Orange
IS?
aPalma p..•"'
Toft Ave
z &'
i
8-
I
EWalnutAve

OLD TOWNE
ATWOOD
VIiia Park
E La VetaAve
FairhavenAv•
PARK SANTIAGO E Santa Clara Ave ' if
n. n, a.?. a!a. 4Google Repcrtarraperror
2026 || Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company || Los Angeles - Anaheim 3 2026 || Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company || Los Angeles - Anaheim 4 2026 || Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company || Los Angeles - Anaheim 5 City of Anaheim -
Inventory Analysis
2026 || Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company || Los Angeles - Anaheim 6 SIMILAR PROJECTS

EXPERIENCES
2026 || Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company || Los Angeles - Anaheim 7 II.

Company Indentification and Experience
Lamar Advertising Company
Attn: Ray Baker, Vice President/ General Manager
1121 S. Boyle Ave, Suite 201
Los Angeles, CA 90023
323-933-3222
The main contact at Lamar who will handle the negotiations of the Agreement will be Ray Baker.

Below is a list of projects that outline Lamar’s experience in developing large projects and the track record of superior design.

Similar Projects
Lamar’ s Southern California Division has a well-established track record of working with local public agencies to develop, construct, and maintain digital displays. For every project, the Lamar team has partnered with the agency to address regulatory issues, community concerns, and aspects of development that serve to maximize the benefits of the project for the agency, community, and local businesses. The regulatory environment for sign development involves multiple agencies and can be complex. Lamar has developed substantial expertise in this area working with public agencies to effectively navigate this process in the most efficient manner possible. For all projects involving freeways, Lamar has obtained the necessary approvals from State of California departments involved in freeway landscape classification, legal, and business issues associated with sign permitting. On a local level, Lamar has assisted agencies with making modifications to existing sign ordinances and effecting zone changes as appropriate. Lamar’s extensive development experience and approach to developing symbiotic relationships with its partnering agencies ensures that agencies obtain maximum financial benefit while maintaining the highest quality and community character. Lamar collaborates with agencies in areas that include providing revenue generation through up-front financial benefits and ensuring long- term property rental income. In addition to the financial benefits, Lamar works to improve community aesthetics by removing and upgrading older signs, assisting with outreach in addressing concerns from the community, providing opportunities for public- service announcements and developing opportunities for promotion of local businesses.

The following is a list of successful relevant projects completed by the team at Lamar Southern California:
2026 || Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company || Los Angeles - Anaheim 8 Similar Project Number 1:

Fullerton, CA
Lamar operates a back-to-back LED digital display
along the 91 Freeway in the City of Fullerton.

Lamar successfully partnered with the city through
a development agreement that allows for the
operation of the digital display while providing
revenue participation to the city. The agreement also
includes provisions for public messaging, including
the promotion of city initiatives and emergency alert
capabilities.

As part of the project, Lamar worked collaboratively
with the city to align on development standards and
ensure compatibility with local planning objectives.

As with all projects, Lamar obtained all necessary
California Department of Transportation approvals in
addition to local entitlements.

Similar Project Number 2:

Lynwood, CA
Lamar operates a digital billboard along the 710
Freeway, just north of the 105 Freeway interchange,
in the City of Lynwood. Lamar partnered with the
city through a development agreement that allows
for the operation of the digital display while providing revenue participation to the city. The agreement also
includes provisions for public messaging, including
the promotion of city initiatives and emergency alert
capabilities.

As part of the project, Lamar removed 26 static
billboard faces within the city, supporting local
objectives to reduce legacy signage and improve
overall corridor aesthetics. Lamar worked collaboratively with the city to align on development standards and ensure compatibility with local planning goals.

As with all projects, Lamar obtained all necessary California Department of Transportation approvals in addition to local entitlements.
2026 || Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company || Los Angeles - Anaheim 9 Similar Project Number 3:

Long Beach, CA
Lamar operates two digital billboard locations in the City of Long Beach— one along the 405 Freeway near the airport and another along the 91 Freeway. Lamar partnered with the city through a development agreement that allows for the operation of these digital displays, including provisions for public messaging such as the promotion of city initiatives and emergency alert capabilities.

As part of the project, Lamar removed a significant number of existing static billboard faces within the city, supporting Long Beach’s objectives to reduce legacy signage and enhance overall corridor aesthetics.

While this agreement does not include direct revenue participation for the city, it provides substantial public benefit through sign reduction, improved visual environment, and ongoing public communication capabilities.

As with all projects, Lamar obtained all necessary California Department of Transportation approvals in addition to local entitlements.
2026 || Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company || Los Angeles - Anaheim 10 Similar Project Number 4:

Placentia, CA
Lamar operates multiple LED digital billboard faces
along the 57 Freeway, just north of the 91 Freeway,
in the City of Placentia. Placentia was Lamar’ s first
city partner in this program and remains a valued
legacy partner. Lamar partnered with the city
through a development agreement that allows for
the operation of these digital displays while providing revenue participation to the city. The agreement also
includes provisions for public messaging, and the
City of Placentia has been highly engaged in utilizing
this platform to promote community initiatives and
emergency alert communications.

Lamar currently operates six digital faces at this
location and has received approval for a fourth and
final location along the 91 Freeway. The final site
is fully entitled, and Lamar is currently awaiting
permit issuance from California Department of
Transportation to proceed with construction.

As with all projects, Lamar has worked closely with
the city to ensure alignment with local planning
objectives and compliance with all regulatory
requirements.
2026 || Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company || Los Angeles - Anaheim 11 Similar Project Number 6:

Murrieta, CA
Lamar operates LED digital billboard displays in the
City of Murrieta, one of the newest cities to approve
participation in this program. Lamar partnered with
the city through a development agreement that
allows for the operation of these digital displays
while providing revenue participation to the city.

The agreement also includes provisions for public
messaging, including the promotion of city initiatives
and emergency alert capabilities.

Lamar is currently in the process of developing
eight digital faces within the city. Four faces have been recently constructed and are operational, with the remaining four faces scheduled for development in the near term.

As with all projects, Lamar has worked closely with the city to ensure alignment with local planning objectives and compliance with all regulatory requirements, including obtaining necessary approvals from California Department of Transportation.

Similar Project Number 5:

El Monte, CA
Lamar has secured entitlements for an LED digital
billboard along the 10 Freeway in the City of El
Monte, one of the latest cities in the Los Angeles
area to participate in this program. Lamar partnered
with the city through a development agreement
that allows for the operation of the digital display
while providing revenue participation to the city.

The agreement also includes provisions for public
messaging, including the promotion of city initiatives
and emergency alert capabilities.

As part of the project, Lamar removed one existing
static billboard within the city to facilitate the development of the digital location, supporting local objectives to modernize signage and improve overall corridor aesthetics. Lamar worked collaboratively with the city to align on development standards and ensure compatibility with local planning goals.

Lamar has obtained all necessary entitlements and is currently awaiting construction materials to begin development, with the display anticipated to be operational by June/July 2026. All work is being completed in full compliance with applicable regulatory requirements, including obtaining necessary approvals from California Department of Transportation.
2026 || Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company || Los Angeles - Anaheim 12 Similar Project Number 8:

Ontario International Airport Authority
Lamar operates 2 LED digital display jr. bulletins
10’x30’) and 2 LED digital displays posters (11’x22’)
on Ontario International Airport property. Lamar’s
response to the Ontario International Airport
Authority’s RFP was awarded and accepted as the
winning bid for all exterior static and digital billboard signage. All displays for this project required leases
with the Ontario International Airport Authority.

Lamar obtained the necessary local and FAA
permits.

Similar Project Number 7:

Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Lamar operates LED digital billboard displays in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, where four digital faces have been developed. Lamar partnered with the city through a development agreement that allows for the operation of these digital displays while providing revenue participation to the city. The agreement also includes provisions for public messaging, including the promotion of city initiatives and emergency alert capabilities.

As part of the project, Lamar removed existing static billboard signage along surface streets, supporting the city’s objectives to reduce visual clutter and enhance the overall aesthetic environment. Lamar worked collaboratively with the city to align on development standards and ensure compatibility with local planning goals.

As with all projects, Lamar has worked closely with the city to ensure alignment with local planning objectives and compliance with all regulatory requirements, including obtaining necessary approvals from California Department of Transportation.
2026 || Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company || Los Angeles - Anaheim 13 Similar Project Number 10:

Fontana, CA
Lamar operates 9 freeway LED digital displays
on city-owned property, providing lease revenue
to the city. Lamar partnered with the city to draft
a comprehensive Ordinance to: 1) permit digital
displays in certain zoning districts of the city; and,
2) allow for the relocation of already- constructed
billboards via a relocation agreement to mutually
benefit the city and Lamar. Lamar collaborated
with the city by constructing and maintaining LED
Digital Displays on city-owned property via a lease
agreement, which provides consistent lease revenue
to the City of Fontana.

In addition to partnering with the City, Lamar
successfully obtained all Caltrans permits, local
permits for compliance with all federal, state and
local legislation.

Similar Project Number 9:

Corona, CA
Lamar operates 8 freeway LED digital displays in the City of Corona. Project includes a profit sharing agreement with the city. Lamar worked closely with the city to develop an ordinance that: 1) permits digital displays in certain zones within the city, and 2) sets forth a static (nondigital) billboard net reduction program to demolish older static billboards, thereby beautifying the city.

As in all projects, Lamar obtained all necessary Caltrans permits, local permits, and approvals for compliance with all federal, state and local legislation.
2026 || Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company || Los Angeles - Anaheim 14 CEQA Opinion
Lamar is committed to the preservation and maintenance of the natural environment and firmly believes in strict adherence to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

In all of the above projects, the lead agency has found that the construction of the LED digital displays were exempt from CEQA. Lamar believes that the City, as lead agency could use the exemption pursuant to Class 3 “ Small Structures”, 14 CCR Section 15303, which provides in part:

Class 3 consists of construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures; installation of small new equipment and facilities in small structures; and the conversion of existing small structures from one use to another where only minor modifications are made in the exterior of the structure. The numbers of structures described in this section are the maximum allowable on any legal parcel.

Examples of this exemption include but are not limited to:

A store, motel, office, restaurant or similar structure not involving the use of significant amountsof hazardous substances, and not exceeding 2500 square feet in floor area. In urbanized areas, the exemption also applies to up to four such commercial buildings not exceeding 10,000 square feet in floor area on sites zoned for such use if not involving the use of significant amounts of hazardous substances where all necessary public services and facilities are available and the surrounding area is not environmentally sensitive.

However, should the City, as lead agency, deem the Project not exempt and determine that the potential environmental cumulative impacts of the Project are significant, Lamar would perform an Initial Study and, depending upon the result, prepare a Negative Declaration. 2026 || Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company || Los Angeles - Anaheim 15 IV.

References
Damien Arrula
City Administrator, City of Placentia, CA
darrula@placentia. org
714) 993- 8118
Dean Derlith
City Attorney, City of Corona, CA
Dean.Derleth@CoronaCA. gov
951) 279-3505
Deborah Robertson
Mayor, City of Rialto, CA
drobertson@rialtoca. gov
909) 644-8520
Jason Caudle
City Manager, City of Lancaster, CA
jcaudle@cityoflancasterca. org
661) 750- 9311
Acquanetta Warren
Mayor, City of Fontana, CA
awarren@fontana. org
909) 578-2586
Wes Speake
Mayor, City of Corona, CA
wes.speake@corona. gov
951) 736-2371
2026 || Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company || Los Angeles - Anaheim 16 PROPERTIES
2026 || Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company || Los Angeles - Anaheim 17 PROPOSED LOCATIONS
5 FWY
5 FW
Y
2026 || Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company || Los Angeles - Anaheim 18 NWC Lincoln / Manchester Southbound
NWC Lincoln / Manchester Northbound
NWC Lincoln / Manchester Southbound
NWC Lincoln / Manchester Northbound
2026 || Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company || Los Angeles - Anaheim 19 SEC Lincoln / Manchester Southbound
SEC Lincoln / Manchester Northbound
SEC Lincoln / Manchester Southbound
SEC Lincoln / Manchester Northbound
2026 || Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company || Los Angeles - Anaheim 20 PROPOSED LOCATION
5 FWY
2026 || Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company || Los Angeles - Anaheim 21 1050 E. Stanford Court - Northbound
1050 E. Stanford Court - Southbound
1050 E Stanford Ct - Northbound
1050 E Stanford Ct - Southbound
2026 || Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company || Los Angeles - Anaheim 22 NWC Lewis / Anaheim - Northbound at 1300 ft.

NWC Lewis / Anaheim - Northbound at 700 ft.

NWC Lewis / Anaheim – Northbound at 1300 ft
NWC Lewis / Anaheim – Northbound at 700 ft
2026 || Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company || Los Angeles - Anaheim 23 NWC Lewis / Anaheim - SouthboundNWC Lewis / Anaheim – Southbound 2026 || Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company || Los Angeles - Anaheim 24 PROPOSED LOCATION
91 FWY
91 FWY
8201 Santa Ana Canyon
91 FWY
2026 || Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company || Los Angeles - Anaheim 25 8201 Santa Ana Canyon - Eastbound
8201 Santa Ana Canyon - Westbound
8201 Santa Ana Canyon - Eastbound
8201 Santa Ana Canyon - Westbound
2026 || Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company || Los Angeles - Anaheim 26 LEASED LOCATIONS
ANAHEIM - 5 FWY, 57 FWY & 91 FWY
5 FWY
300 Wilshire
57 FWY
2590 Cerritos
91 FWY
3001 White Star
2026 || Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company || Los Angeles - Anaheim 27 300 Wilshire - Northbound - 5 FWY
300 Wilshire - Southbound - 5 FWY
300 Wilshire - Northbound
300 Wilshire - Southbound
2026 || Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company || Los Angeles - Anaheim 28 2590 Cerritos - 57 FWY
3001 White Star - 91 FWY
2026 || Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company || Los Angeles - Anaheim 29 AGREEMENT TERMS

CONDITIONS
2026 || Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company || Los Angeles - Anaheim 30 AGREEMENT TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Term
The proposed agreement is for a term of thirty (30) years, with an optional ten (10) year renewal period, subject to mutual agreement.

Compensation to the City
Lamar is prepared to provide the City of Anaheim with a significant and stable long-term revenue stream through this program.

Estimated Annual Compensation:

Approximately $ 2,125,000 per year
Total Estimated Compensation ( 30-Year Term):

Approximately $ 63,750,000
This structure is designed to provide the City with both predictable annual revenue and long-term financial value, while maintaining flexibility to finalize the underlying terms and conditions in collaboration with the City.

Community Benefits
Economic Development:

A 25% discount off the rate card for any business located within the City of Anaheim, supporting local economic growth and increased visibility for local businesses.

Public Safety & Messaging:

Dedicated access for emergency alerts and public service messaging, including:

AMBER Alerts
Law enforcement notifications
Earthquake and fire alerts
Trafficmessaging
Public health communications
Advertising Standards
No sexually oriented businesses (SOBs), including but not limited to adult entertainment venues, conventions, or related content.

All advertising will comply with applicable local, state, and federal regulations. 2026 || Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company || Los Angeles - Anaheim 31 Insurance
Lamar will maintain insurance coverage consistent with City of Anaheim requirements and all applicable California state laws.

Regulatory Compliance
All development and operations will be conducted in full compliance with applicable regulatory requirements, including obtaining necessary approvals from California Department ofTransportation.

Economic Impact & Partnership Value
This program represents a meaningful long-term partnership between Lamar and the City of Anaheim, delivering both direct financial benefit and broader economic impact. In addition to the approximately 85 million in projected revenue to the City over the term, the program provides a platform to support local businesses, enhance public communication, and strengthen Anaheim’s economic development initiatives.

By combining sustained revenue generation with community-focused benefits, this proposal is designed to create lasting value for the City while aligning with Anaheim’s broader goals for growth, visibility, and public engagement.
2026 || Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company || Los Angeles - Anaheim 32 IX.

Indemnity
As stated in our Development Agreement, Section B, item 15 on page 76 of this proposal) Indemnification. Developer agrees to, and shall, hold City and its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents and employees free and harmless from all liability for damage or claims for damage for personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise from the direct or indirect operations of Developer or those of Developer’ s contractor, subcontractor, agent, employee or other person acting on Developer’ s behalf which relate to the construction and operation of the Project. Developer agrees to, and shall, defend City and its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents and employees with respectto actions for damages caused or alleged to have been caused by reason of Developer’ s activities in connection with the Project. This hold harmless provision applies to all damages and claims for damage suffered or alleged to have been suffered by reason of the operations referred to in this Development Agreement regardless of whether or not the City prepared, supplied or approved the plans, specifications or other documents for the Project.

Susana Barrios
From: Stephanie Mercadante <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, April21, 20265:05PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] OnBehalfofTomFelder, District1, Councilmember RyanBalius Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

ForpubliccommentonApril21, 2026:

Goodevening, Mayor andCouncil Members,
Werecognize theCityhasrepeatedly statedthatAnaheim’swaterissafe, andresidents certainly wantthattobetrue. Butpublic confidence isbuiltontransparency andtrust, notonsocialmedia videosorassurances alone.

Tonight’spresentation isanopportunity fortransparency. Iexpectitwillemphasize thatAnaheim’s waterissafeandregularly tested. Residents relyonCity, State, andFederal experts toprovide accurate information aboutourdrinking water, andthatinformation mustbecomplete andconsistent.

Weareheretoensure thisdiscussion issubstantive, notpromotional. Whatresidents needto understand iswhendecisions weremade, whytheyweremade, andwhether theyweremadeina timelymanner.

Public statements showthattheStatenotified theCityonDecember22, 2025, thatWell51, serving WestAnaheim, hadPFOSlevelsof6.2partspertrillion, exceeding the4.0pptNotificationLevel.

PFASmaysound minimal atpartspertrillion, butitismeasured atthatscalebecause itistoxiceven atextremely lowconcentrations. PFASexposure isassociated withimmune suppression, thyroid disruption, liverdamage, reproductive issues, andincreased riskofkidney andtesticular cancer.

UnderCalifornia law, including Health & SafetyCodeSection116455andStateWaterBoard Division ofDrinking Water guidance, theCityisrequired tonotify itsgoverning bodywhenawell exceeds theNotification Level.

According topublic records, Anaheim PublicUtilities notified theCityCouncil onFebruary17, 2026 thatWell51wasshutdown. Thatraisesacritical question: whydidittake58daysaftertheState’s notification toinform theCouncil andinitiateshutdown?
Records alsoindicate thewellwasnotactually shutdownuntilMarch6, 2026 — 17daysafterthe Council wastolditwasclosed, and74daysaftertheState’sinitialnotification.

These datesmatter. They speak directly towhether required actions weretakenpromptly and whether thepublic received accurate, timely information about “forever chemicals” intheirdrinking water.

Ifthepublic cannotrelyonconsistency intheinformation provided, thenevery futureassurance becomes hardertotrust. Andatthatpoint, theissueisnolongerjustaboutwaterquality; itisabout credibility.
1 Susana Barrios
From: Stephanie Mercadante <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, April21, 20265:06PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] OnBehalfofGeorgia Price, District6, Councilmember Natalie Meeks Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

ForpubliccommentonApril21, 2026:

Goodevening, Mayor andCouncil Members,
Thisissuecomes downtothreedates:

1. 2.

3. WhenPFOScontamination wasdetected,

4. 5.

6. 7. WhentheStatewasnotified,

8. 9.

10. 11. WhenWell51wasactually takenoffline.

12. These datesarecriticaltodetermining whether thepublic received timelyandaccurate information.

Based onavailable records, theStatewasnotified inlateDecember thatPFOSlevelsatWell51 exceeded thenotification threshold. Yetthewellappears tohaveremained inservice untilearly March, approximately 74dayslater. Residents werealsotoldthewellwastakenoffline onorabout February17, whileotherrecords indicate itcontinued operating beyond thatdate.

Thisisnotamatterofinterpretation. Itisamatterofdates. Anddatesdonotchange. IfbothFebruary andMarch appearintherecord, thepublic deserves toknowwhichonereflects reality—andwhythey weretoldsomething different.

Beyond thetimeline, thereisalargerquestion. TheCityhaspreviously takenotherwellsoffline due toPFASconcerns. Thisisnotanewsituation, andthereisalready anestablished approach for responding toexceedances. Sowhatwasdifferent here?
Whatfactors ledtothedecision tocontinue operating Well51formorethantwomonths afterthe exceedance wasidentified, when moreimmediate action hasbeentakeninother cases? Iftherewereoperational constraints, blending strategies, orsystem limitations, thoseshould be clearly explained. Butifthiswasadiscretionary decision, thenthepublic deserves tounderstand the reasoning behind it, especially giventheknown risksassociated withPFASexposure overtime.

Sotonight, Iamasking forsomething straightforward:
1 Please provide aclear, documented timeline forWell51, andexplain thedecision-making process thatledtothedelay intaking thewelloffline.

Whentimelines don’talignanddecisions aren’texplained, theissueisnolongerjustwaterquality. It becomes aquestion ofwhether thepublic cantrusttheinformation they’rebeinggiven. And confidence inourwater system depends notonlyonsafety, butontransparency andconsistency. 2 Susana Barrios
From: Stephanie Mercadante <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, April21, 20265:10PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] OnBehalfofMarcHerbert
Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

ForpubliccommentonApril21, 2026:

Goodevening, Mayor andCouncil Members,
Iwanttoaddress anissuethatiscriticaltopublic confidence: whether water sampling reflects normal system conditions oridealones. TheCitycontinues tostatethatthewaterissafe, butthose assurances relyoncompliance sampling. Thestrength ofthoseresults depends ononeprinciple: that samples represent thewaterresidents receive everyday, notconditions thatareoptimized beforehand.

Right now, thereisagrowing gapbetween whatresidents areexperiencing andwhattheyarebeing told. Residents arereporting strong chlorine odors, discoloration, andinconsistent waterquality.

Whether thoseissues aretemporary, localized, orsystemic, theyraiseafundamental question: do compliance samples reflectwhatresidents actually experience attheirtap, orsomething different? Sotonight, Iamrequesting clarityontheCity’ssampling protocols, specifically astheyrelateto system flushing. Does theCityconduct hydrant flushing before oraftercompliance sampling? Ifso, underwhatconditions? Andarethoseactivities disclosed whenresultsarepresented tothepublicor tothisCouncil?
Ifoperational activities likeflushing occurimmediately before sampling, itraisesareasonable concern: arethose samples capturing normal, day-to-daywaterquality, ortemporarily improved conditions? Thisisnotanaccusation; itisarequest fortransparency. Ifthesystem isoperating properly, thenthesampling methodology should standuptoscrutiny andbeclearly explained.

Iwouldalsoaskwhether theStateWaterBoard hasreviewed thesepractices, andwhether they consider themrepresentative oftypical system conditions ifflushing occurs between tests.

Attheendoftheday, thiscomes downtotrust. Ifsampling reflects idealconditions instead oftypical conditions, then “safe” becomes amoving target. Residents arenotasking forbest-casescenarios.

Theyareasking foranaccurate picture ofwhatcomes outoftheirtapeveryday. Andwhenresidents turntobottled waterwhilebeingtoldeverything isfine, thatisnotjustperception; itisabreakdown in public confidence.

Sotonight, Iamasking theCitytoclosethatgapwithtransparency, notjustreassurance. 1 Susana Barrios
From: Stephanie Mercadante <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, April21, 20265:15PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] OnBehalfofStephanie Mercadante, District4, Councilmember Norma Campos Kurtz
Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

ForpubliccommentonApril21, 2026:

Goodevening, Mayor andCouncil Members,
Whatwearehearing tonight isnotjustatechnical discussion; itisamatter ofpublictrust. Residents arebeingasked torelyonrepeated assurances thatthewaterissafe. Butwhentimelines don’talign, whenoperational detailsareunclear, andwhenreasonable questions gounanswered, thattrust erodes.

SoIwanttobeclearaboutwhatisbeingrequested tonight. Weareasking theCity’spresentation to directly address:

Thediscrepancy between theFebruary andMarchWell51shutdown dates Thedecision nottotakethewellofflineimmediately aftertheState’sDecember notification Andwhether operational practices — suchasflushing — mayinfluence sampling results, including whether
normal flushing timesarefiveminutes ratherthanthe30–60minutes residents havereported, andwhether thesepractices arereviewed byanyone outside theCityofAnaheim These arenotextreme questions. Theyarereasonable, andtheydeserve directanswers. Because whentheinformation provided tothepublicdoesnotfullyalignwithregulatory data, itcreates doubt, intentional ornot. Andoncedoubtisintroduced, theburden shiftsbacktotheCitytoprovide clarity.

Thereisalsoabroader concern. Residents arereporting chlorine odors, discoloration, and inconsistent waterquality whilebeingtoldthewaterissafe. Arethesecomplaints beingrecorded and 1 tracked? Isthatinformation available tothepublic? Thatgapbetween official messaging andlived experience isexactly whythesequestions matter.

Claims ofsafety relyontesting, buttesting onlybuilds trustifitreflects normal conditions. Soweare asking astraightforward question: dosampling results reflectwhatresidents actually experience at thetap, orconditions influenced bysystem practices likeflushing? And, justasimportantly, hasthe Statereviewed thosepractices toconfirm theyarerepresentative, oraretheysimply accepting what theyaretoldwhileresidents’ concerns gounaddressed?
Iftestingreflects best-caseconditions instead oftypical conditions, thenthewaterisn’tsafeinany meaningful sense.

Hereisthebottom line:

Ifthewaterissafe, thedatashould beconsistent.

Iftheprocess issound, itshould betransparent.

AndiftheCityisconfident inboth, thenthesequestions should beeasytoanswer. Clearly, directly, andontherecord.

Repeating thatthewaterissafeisnotenough.

Holding upwaterbottles isnotenough.

Posting videosonsocialmediaisnotenough.

Provide apresentation thatshows theproof, notpretty photosandcharts. 2 Susana Barrios
From: Stephanie Mercadante <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, April21, 20269:55PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] Re: OnBehalfofDaveDuran, District1, Councilmember RyanBalius Attachments: 2026_04_20_23_02_07_1.mp3
Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

Replyingagainonthisthreadtoincludetheaudiothatwasplayedduringtoday'sPublicComments.

Pleasefinditattached.

OnTue, Apr21, 2026at5:19PMStephanieMercadante <[email protected]> wrote:

ForpubliccommentonApril21, 2026:
th Incasethepublicdidn’tgetachance tohearand/orattend theMarch24 CityCouncil meeting, I believe itisimportant tolistentowhatthemayoristellingthepublic: PLAYRECORDING Thanks totonight’slastfewspeakers, themayor andthecouncil have “again” learned thatthereare residents ofthiscitythathavebeensounding analarmofcritical importance because themayor and thecouncil have ‘again” failedtodo…Sotonight, Iwanttodocument andletthepublic knowthat theyshould seriously consider havingtheirAnaheim tapwatertested fortheirpersonal safety…the safetyoftheirfamily…theirpets, and/ortheiremployees since it’sevident thatAnaheim officials have failedtoproperly takethenecessary actions…whichareprobably required bylaw…toimmediately notify itsresidents whiletaking therequired actions toimmediately mitigate imminent and/orpotential harmtothepublic.

Iamasking theAnaheim residents, Anaheim business owners, andAnaheim employees tosaveand callthisphone number tohelpmake sureyourdrinking waterissafe…Formoreinformation andor toshareyourconcerns, please calltheEPA - SafeDrinking WaterHotline at1-800-426- 4791…AGAIN, that’s1-800-426-4791.

OnDecember 5, 2025USAToday reported thatanalysis oftherecords shows waterutilities in Anaheim California hasjoined 944systems scattered across thecountry thathavealsofailedto meettheEPAstandards. Thesummary report stated: Onaverage, PFOSwasmeasured 4.5times overthelimitatWell47. Altogether, testing detected sevenchemicals at12locations. Thehighest single measurement was7.3times overtheallowable limit. Andaccording totheresults foundbythe Environmental Protection Agency, (published inNovember 2025) Anaheim’sPFSAwaswelloverthe limit.
1 Well51…Well47…whatotherfailedwellsaremissing fromthereport?....WhatelsehaveAnaheim officials failedtobetransparent about?...moreimportant ishowmany residents havebeenharmed bythecity’ssilence?
Thiscityneeds topublicly andimmediately notifyeveryone…residents, schools, andbusinesses that wereandarecurrently injeopardy ofsuffering harmfrombeingincontact and/oringesting the potentially toxiccitywater.

Please donotdismiss ourgenuine concerns, documented findings, orcomments.

Inclosing, ifyouarenotmotivated totakeaction toimprove thehealth andsafetyofallthepeople wholive, work, gotoschool, orvisitAnaheim, please immediately resign sosomeone morequalified canreplace youforthehealth, safetyandbetterment ofsociety…OR…dowhattheresidents ofthis cityelected youtodobecause thepublic deserves toknowthetruthinstead ofbeingmisinformed or liedtobytheperson theyvotedtorepresent them….

AreDisney lobbyists paying youortellingyoutostayquietaboutthetoxicwatersothetourists won’t decide tonotgotoDisneyland because thewaterisn’tsafetodrink… orconventions andshows won’twanttoplanorbookhotelsand/orevents attheconvention center…isthiswhytheresidents arebeingneglected, misinformed and/ororliedto?...Whodoyoubelieve theEnvironmental Protection Agency, USAToday, Anaheim’sownreports/findings orthemayorwhoeitherbelieves, is misinformed, orwhoismaliciously lyingtothepublic statingthatthewaterissafe… 2 Susana Barrios
From: Stephanie Mercadante <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, April21, 20265:20PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] OnBehalfofDaveDuran, District1, Councilmember RyanBalius Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

ForpubliccommentonApril21, 2026:
th Incasethepublicdidn’tgetachance tohearand/orattend theMarch24 CityCouncil meeting, I believe itisimportant tolistentowhatthemayoristellingthepublic: PLAYRECORDING Thanks totonight’slastfewspeakers, themayor andthecouncil have “again” learned thatthereare residents ofthiscitythathavebeensounding analarmofcritical importance because themayor and thecouncil have ‘again” failedtodo…Sotonight, Iwanttodocument andletthepublic knowthatthey should seriously consider havingtheirAnaheim tapwatertested fortheirpersonal safety…thesafety oftheirfamily…theirpets, and/ortheiremployees sinceit’sevident thatAnaheim officials havefailed toproperly takethenecessary actions…whichareprobably required bylaw…toimmediately notify its residents whiletaking therequired actions toimmediately mitigate imminent and/orpotential harmto thepublic.

Iamasking theAnaheim residents, Anaheim business owners, andAnaheim employees tosaveand callthisphone numbertohelpmake sureyourdrinking waterissafe…Formoreinformation andorto shareyourconcerns, please calltheEPA - SafeDrinking WaterHotline at1-800-426-4791…AGAIN, that’s1-800-426-4791.

OnDecember 5, 2025USAToday reported thatanalysis oftherecords shows waterutilities in Anaheim California hasjoined 944systems scattered across thecountry thathavealsofailedtomeet theEPAstandards. Thesummary report stated: Onaverage, PFOSwasmeasured 4.5times overthe limitatWell47. Altogether, testing detected seven chemicals at12locations. Thehighest single measurement was7.3timesovertheallowable limit. Andaccording totheresults foundbythe Environmental Protection Agency, (published inNovember 2025) Anaheim’sPFSAwaswelloverthe limit.

Well51…Well47…whatotherfailedwellsaremissing fromthereport?....WhatelsehaveAnaheim officials failedtobetransparent about?...moreimportant ishowmany residents havebeenharmed by thecity’ssilence?
1 Thiscityneeds topublicly andimmediately notifyeveryone…residents, schools, andbusinesses that wereandarecurrently injeopardy ofsuffering harmfrombeingincontact and/oringesting the potentially toxiccitywater.

Please donotdismiss ourgenuine concerns, documented findings, orcomments.

Inclosing, ifyouarenotmotivated totakeaction toimprove thehealth andsafetyofallthepeople wholive, work, gotoschool, orvisitAnaheim, please immediately resign sosomeone morequalified canreplace youforthehealth, safetyandbetterment ofsociety…OR…dowhattheresidents ofthis cityelected youtodobecause thepublic deserves toknowthetruthinstead ofbeingmisinformed or liedtobytheperson theyvotedtorepresent them….

AreDisney lobbyists paying youortellingyoutostayquietaboutthetoxicwatersothetourists won’t decide tonotgotoDisneyland because thewaterisn’tsafetodrink… orconventions andshows won’twanttoplanorbookhotelsand/orevents attheconvention center…isthiswhytheresidents arebeingneglected, misinformed and/ororliedto?...Whodoyoubelieve theEnvironmental Protection Agency, USAToday, Anaheim’sownreports/findings orthemayorwhoeitherbelieves, is misinformed, orwhoismaliciously lyingtothepublic statingthatthewaterissafe… 2 Susana Barrios
From: Bobby <boleajuly2022@gmail. com>
Sent: Tuesday,
To: SjanyLarson-Cash; Audrey Lujan; Ashleigh Aitken; Norma C. Kurtz; Natalie Meeks; Kristen Maahs; RyanBalius; CarlosA. Leon; NatalieRubalcava; PublicComment Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\]
Youdon'to?engetemailfrom Learnwhythisisimportantat
h?ps://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIden?ca?on \]
Warning: Thisemailoriginated fromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropena?achments unlessyou recognize thesenderandareexpec?ngthemessage.

HappyTuesdayeveryone IlikefortheLibrary togetextended toleastanhouropeningandclosingandinotherci?es aroundOrangeCountybesidesOrangebecausetheyhavedicul?esrightnowtoseeifIcanopenat10AMandcloseat 8PMLibraryinAnaheim openat11it’sbasically themorninggone. I’dliketoseethemallthelibrariesinAnaheimopen at10andcloseat8o’clockandit’s ?mefortheallthelibrariesopenonSaturdays thankyouforyour ?meSentfrommy iPhone
1 Susana Barrios
From: RubenSoto <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday,
To: TheWhiteHouse; Greggo Soto; RubenSoto; U.S. Department ofJustice; OC Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage. 1 Susana Barrios
From: RubenSoto <195619922000rubselnad@gmail. com>
Sent: Friday, April
To: TheWhiteHouse; PublicComment; webmaster@riversideca. gov; OliviaSelmanson; Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage. 1 Susana Barrios
From: RubenSoto <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April
To: RubenSoto; RubenSoto; TheWhiteHouse; Greggo Soto; U.S. Department ofJustice; Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage. 1 Susana Barrios
From: RubenSoto <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April
To: RubenSoto; RubenSoto; TheWhiteHouse; Mhines; OliviaSelmanson; OC lawyers
Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage. 1 Susana Barrios
From: RubenSoto <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April
To: RubenSoto; RubenSoto; U.S. Department ofJustice; OliviaSelmanson; TheWhite Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage. 1 Susana Barrios
From: RubenSoto <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, April
To: TheWhiteHouse; [email protected]; TaxMail; Tigtacommunications; OC YouTube
Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage. 1 Susana Barrios
From: RubenSoto <195619922000rubselnad@gmail. com>
Sent: Sunday, April
To: TheWhite House; RubenSoto; PublicComment; webmaster@riversideca. gov; Olivia Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage. 1 Susana Barrios
From: RubenSoto <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April
To: RubenSoto; RubenSoto; Rep. LouCorrea; [email protected]; RareBeauty; Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage. 1 Susana Barrios
From: RubenSoto <195619922000rubselnad@gmail. com>
Sent: Sunday, April
To: TheWhite House; RubenSoto; PublicComment; webmaster@riversideca. gov; Olivia Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage. 1 Susana Barrios
From: RubenSoto <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April
To: TheWhiteHouse; [email protected]; TaxMail; Tigtacommunications; getyou" onYouTube
Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage. 1 Susana Barrios
From: RubenSoto <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April
To: TheWhite House; [email protected]; RubenSoto; RareBeauty; RubenSoto; Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

Forwardedmessage ---------
From: Morgan & Morgan, P.A. <[email protected]> Date: Mon, Apr20, 2026, 2:37PM
Subject: Your2026MarijuanaRoadmap
To: <
A quick guide to staying on the right side of the law this 4/ 20 Advertising Material | NewsfromMorgan & Morgan | ViewOnline 1 There'snobetterdaythanApril20thtotakestockofwhere marijuana laws actually stand. Thelegal landscape hasshifteddramatically inrecentyears, butso hastheconversation around howpeople useit, andwhy.

Whether it’salreadyastapleinyourlifeoryou’resimply curious aboutwhat’s changed lately, here’swhatyouneedtoknow.

MarijuanaasMedicine
Whenitcomestomedicalmarijuana, there'sno “rightway” thatworksfor everyone. Ithelpstothinkabouthowquicklyyouneedrelief, howlongyou wanttheeffectstolast, andwhetheryourdoctorhasanyguidance. Here'sa lookatthemostcommonmethodstohelpyouweighyouroptions.

Smoking: Formostpeople, smoking isthefirstmethod thatcomes to mind. Itoffersarapidonsetofeffectswithinminutes (orevenseconds), makingitusefulforsymptoms thatneedquickrelief. However, smoking 2 carries risksandcanbeharmfultoyourlungs. Withthatinmind, it's generally notthefirstrecommendation formedical use.

Vaping: Likesmoking, vapingworksquickly. Vapepensandherb vaporizers avoidsmoke, butit'sworthknowing thattheymayexpose you tosubstances thatcancauselungdamage.

Edibles: Ifyoudon’tneedimmediate relief, ediblesareapopular alternative tosmoking andvaping. Marijuana canbeinfused intobaked goods, gummies, chocolates, andmore. Whiletheytakelongertokickin anywhere from30minutes to2hours), theeffects tendtolastlonger thansmoking. Thismakes themagoodfitformanaging symptoms that benefitfromsustained relief.

Tinctures: Likeedibles, tinctures letyouskipthesmokeentirely. These cannabis-infused liquids (usually alcoholoroil-based) canbetakenin smalldosesunderthetongue ormixed intoadrink. Theonsettendsto fallsomewhere between smoking andedibles.

Lotions & Balms: Cannabis-infused lotions, oils, andbalmsareapplied directly totheskin. Thismethod islessstudied thantheothers, and there'snofirmconsensus yetonhoweffective itis. Anecdotally, some peoplehavefoundithelpfulforskinconditions, inflammation, and localized discomfort.

KnowtheLawWhereYouLive
Marijuanalawsvarymorethanyoumightthink. Understanding thedistinctions canhelpyoumakeinformeddecisions.

MedicalUse: Marijuana isusedtotreatpainassociated withagrowing numberofmedical conditions. Although theprocess variesfromstateto state, patients interested inmedical marijuana canbecome certified 3 through theirhealthcare providerforthetreatment ofqualified illnesses.

Insomestates, caregivers canbegrantedtheirowncardstoenable themtopickupandadminister medical marijuana fortheirlovedones.

Recreational & Medical Use: Instateswhererecreational useis legalized, adults21+ areallowed topurchase, consume, andsometimes evengrowmarijuana withoutaqualifying medical condition. Butbefore yourushtoyournearest dispensary, don’tforgettocheck thespecific lawsinplaceforyourstate. Theremaybelimitations onthenumberof ounces youcanpurchase orthenumberofplantsyoucangrowinyour home.

CBD/Low-THC: CBD, shortfor “cannabidiol” isacompound foundin cannabis plantsthatdoesn’tmakeyoufeel “high.” Studies haveshown thatCBDmaybeeffective intreating epilepsy, chronicpain, and insomnia among otherconditions. Inthe10states thatdon’tallow medical orrecreational marijuana usage, CBD/low-THCproducts may stillbeavailable.

Travelingsoon?
Beforeyoupackyourbags, besuretocheckthemarijuanalawswhereyou're going. Andremember: evenbetweentwolegalstates, crossingstatelineswith marijuanaisstillafederaloffense.
4 Georgia legislature hasapproved abillthatwould liftlimitsonTHC content inmedical marijuana, andhas beensenttothegovernor tobesigned intolaw.

ABriefHistoryofPotDaddy
5 MarijuanaispersonaltoJohnMorgan’sfamily: hisfatherandbrotherhave benefitedfromuseofmedicalmarijuanatoeasepainfulsymptomswithoutthe harmfulsideeffectsoraddictivequalitiesofpowerfulpainmedications.

So, togetherwithUnitedforCare, wejoinedthefighttolegalizemedical marijuanainFlorida. Aftergathering700,000signaturestogetitontheballot, a failedattempttopassitin2014, andmillionsofdollarsspent, medical marijuanalegalizationfinallypassedwith71% ofthevotein2016. JohnMorgan waslovinglydubbed “PotDaddy.”
ShopPotDaddy
Celebrate4/20withtheverybestofPotDaddymerch. Usediscountcode FTP420fora10% discount. OfferendsApril30th.

ShopNow
6 Injured?
7 We’reheretohelp. Withover50practice areas, Morgan & Morgan isreadytofight foryouifyou’vebeeninjuredorharmed inanautoaccident, byafaultyproduct, by anegligent corporation, andmore.

SeeHowWeCanHelp
TriviaAnswer: A
833.573.0545 | forthepeople.com | [email protected] 2026 Morgan & Morgan, PA. AllRight Reserved.

Tepodemos ayudar enEspañol | 855.925.0666 | www.abogados.com America'slargest injury lawfirm.

Morgan & Morgan, P.A., 20N. Orange Ave. Suite 1600, Orlando, FL, 32801 US RESULTS AREBASED ONCUMULATIVE RECOVERIES ACROSS MORGAN & MORGAN'SOFFICES NATIONWIDE.

ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT.

Morgan & Morgan, P.A. isalawfirmlocated at20N. Orange Avenue, Suite1600, Orlando, FL32801. Thelawyers responsible forthisadarelicensed inFlorida andmayrelyonco-counsel forsome orallofthecases. Thechoice ofalawyer isan important decision, anditshould never bebased solely upon anadvertisement. Before making your choice ofanyattorney, youshould givethismatter careful thought. Theselection ofanattorney isanimportant decision. Norepresentation ismade thatthelegal services tobeperformed aregreater thanthequality oflegal services performed byotherlawyers. Every case is different andmust bejudged onitsownmerit. Norepresentation ismadehereabout your specific rights. Cases willbe handled byattorneys licensed inthelocal jurisdiction. Anyattorney appearing inthisadmaynotbelicensed inthelocal jurisdiction. Morgan & Morgan haslawyers licensed topractice lawinall50states andWashington DC. Orlando FL. Cases may beassociated with, orreferred to, otherlawfirmsasco-counsel orreferral counsel inthese andotherjurisdictions. Prior results donotguarantee asimilar outcome. Norepresentation ismade thatthelawyers arecertified specialists orexperts in anyfieldoflaw. Contingent attorney fees arenegotiable andnotsetbylaw. Nolegal feesorcosts willbecharged unless a recovery isobtained fortheclient. Nolegal services oradvice willbeprovided unless awritten agreement issigned bythe clientandlawyer. Only thelawfirm’snon-lawyer staffed callcenter isopen 24hours aday / 7daysaweek. Portions ofthisad maybeasimulation, notshowing actual persons orevents. FREE BACKGROUND INFORMATION ISAVAILABLE UPON REQUEST.

Disclaimer andTerms ofUse
8 Unsubscribe | Manage Subscription | Privacy Policy
9 Susana Barrios
From: MikeHazelrigg <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April10, 202611:41AM
To: MikeHazelrigg
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] Invitation toHumeChristian Camps- FreeFundraising EventinNewport Beach
Youdon'[email protected]. Learnwhythisisimportant Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

DearCouncilmembers andCityLeaders,
Ihopethismessagefindsyouwell.

IamwritingtoinviteyoutoattendtheRippleofLife: ExpandingImpactGala, a specialfundraising eventsupporting theworkofHumeChristianCampsatthe HarborsideGrandBallroom inNewportBeach.

TheministryofHumeChristianCampsprovidesyear-roundyouthcampsandretreats thatfocusonmentorship, characterdevelopment, andbuildingstrong, values-centered communities foryoungpeople.

Thegalawillbeaneveningdedicatedtosharingstoriesofimpact, connectingwith community leaders, andraisingsupporttoexpandopportunities foryouthtoexperience theselife-changingprograms.

Moredetailsandregistration canbefoundhere:
https://www.eventbrite.com/e/ripple-of-life-expanding-impact-gala-tickets1983487568712?aff=oddtdtcreator Wewouldbehonoredbyyourpresenceatthisevent, asyourleadershipplaysan importantroleinsupporting initiativesthatstrengthenfamilies, youthdevelopment, and communitywell-being. Wouldyouconsidersigningupforatableortwo? Thereisno chargefortheevent, buttherewillbeanopportunity tosupporttheministryifyoufeel ledtodoso.

Pleaseletmeknowifyouhaveanyquestionsorifwecanassistwithyourattendance. I wouldbehappytoprovideadditionaldetails.

Thankyouforyourservicetoourcommunity, andIhopeyoucanjoinus.

WarmRegards,
1 Mike
MikeHazelrigg
MajorGiftOfficer CenCal Development
559) 970-8425 hume.org
Learnmoreaboutgiving, giftplanning, ordonoradvisement.
2 Susana Barrios
From: Rep. LouCorrea <[email protected]. gov> Sent: Friday, April10, 20263:57PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] 4.10.26Weekly Update
Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

Hello,
Ihope thismessage finds youwell. It’sbeen abusy week working forCalifornia’s46th Congressional District, andIwanttotakeamoment toshare aquick update:

ADog’sDayOut
Lastweekend, Iwasexcited tocelebrate theopening ofSanta Ana’sfirstdogparkatCentennial Park andseesomany neighbors outenjoying it. This isaspace built forhappy tailsandalotof newfour-legged friendships. Youcould sayit’sapawsitive addition toourcommunity! 1 Rep. LouCorreainteractswithahappydoggowhoenjoyedthenewpark.

CongressionalArtCompetition
HighSchool Students: Myoffice isnowaccepting submissions forthe2026 Congressional Art Competition! Show uswhatmakes ourcommunity special through your eyes. Whether it’sadetailed sketch, apowerful photograph, orapainting, wewant toseeyour creativity. Thedeadline tosubmit your artwork isApril15th@5PM.

Visit mywebsite foradditional information ontheCongressional ArtCompetition. 2 Asalways, Iamcommitted toserving you, representing yourinterests incommittee hearings, and standing forourunderrepresented immigrant communities. Ifyouneed assistance, areapplying for 3 awork permit, orhave anyimmigration questions, myoffice ishere tohelp. Give usacallat (714) 559-6190.

Sincerely,
Rep. LouCorrea
Member ofCongress
Sign upformynewsletter togetupdates onthisissue andothers! SignUp!
Visitmywebsite tolearn more!
correa.house.gov
Contact Me
Washington D.C. Santa Ana
1039 Longworth House Rancho Santiago
Office Building Community College Building
Washington, DC20515 2323N. Broadway, Suite 319
202) 225-2965 SantaAna, CA92706
714) 559-6190
Unsubscribefromfuturemessages.
4 Susana Barrios
From: Rep. LouCorrea <[email protected]. gov> Sent: Friday, April17, 20265:34PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] 4.17.26Weekly Update
Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

Hello,
It’sbeen another busy week inOrange County andWashington, D.C., working forCalifornia’s46th Congressional District. Here aresome highlights:

PresentingFederalFundingtotheFullertonFireDepartment
Iwasproud tosecure federal funding fortheFullerton FireDepartment. Firefighters serve onthe front lines ofmany oftheworst tragedies that communities face, which iswhy itisincredibly important thattheyhave theresources they need toeffectively andsafely respond toemergencies.

Learn more bywatching ABC7‘snews segment andtheFullerton Observer‘sarticle about myevent. 1 Rep. LouCorreaspeakstotheFullertonFireDepartment.

OneBigUglyBill
Over46,000peopleinourcommunity willloseaccess tohealthcoverage duetoMedicaid cutsinthe Republicans' OneBigUglyBill.

ANDguesswhat? Republicans inWashington setupavotethisweektocelebrate that. 2 Rep. LouCorreaexplainstheOneBig “Ugly” Bill.

Fighting forDACA Recipients
Iled86colleagues todemand answers from theSecretary ofHomeland Security onwhy DACA recipients arefacing majorrenewal delays—causing financial hardship, jobloss, andeven detention andremoval. DACA recipients deserve protection andapathway tocitizenship, nottobefailed by their government. Read NOTUS' articletofindoutmore.
3 VotetoRemoveU.S. ForcesfromIranWar
Congress isthebranch ofgovernment withthesole power todeclare war. 4 WeareatwarinIran. Yet, thePresident has yettojustify toCongress whyweareengaged inthis war, what theobjectives are, when these objectives willbeaccomplished, andwhatawinlooks like.

Congress needs toreassert ourauthority todeclare war. This nation must notbepartofanyefforts todestroy thePersian Civilization oranyother civilization.

Ivoted fortheIranwarpowers legislation tocease American efforts inthiswar.

National Institute onDrugAbuseDirectorSpeaks toPATHCaucus Honored tohave Dr. NoraVolkow, theNational Institute onDrug Abuse Director, joinmeandmy PATH Caucus Co-chair Rep. JackBergman todiscuss clinical research onpsychedelic therapies andhowthese emerging therapies show strong results intreating addiction, depression, andother conditions.
5 Rep. LouCorreameetswithDr. NoraVolkowatthePATHCaucusroundtable.

Honoring Sylvia Mendez
6 Sylvia Mendez reminds usoftheimportance ofstanding upforyourself andyour community.

Californians should beaware thatschool segregation wasnotjustaninjustice thatoccurred inthe JimCrow’ South, butithappened right here too. Recognizing bothSylvia Mendez’sstory andthe landmark Mendez v. Westminster ruling through astate holiday willhelpshine alightonthehistory ofschool segregation inOrange County, theperseverance oftheLatino community, andhowa young girlhasthepowertomake sweeping change.

Rep. LouCorreaawardsSylviaMendezaCongressionalCertificate.

Orange County JobFair
OnApril23from11amto2pm, Santa AnaCollege willbehosting ajobfair. Interested inattending? Register here.
7 I’mproud toserve you—whether thatmeans advocating foryour priorities incommittee hearings orchampioning thevoices ofourunderrepresented immigrant communities. Ifyou’renavigating theimmigration process, applying forawork permit, orsimply havequestions, myoffice isready tohelpevery stepoftheway. Don’thesitate toreach outat (714) 559-6190—we’rehere foryou.

Sincerely,
Rep. LouCorrea
Member ofCongress
Sign upformynewsletter togetupdates onthisissue andothers! SignUp!
Visitmywebsite tolearn more!
correa.house.gov
Contact Me
8 Washington D.C. Santa Ana
2082 Rayburn House Office Building Rancho Santiago
Washington, DC20515 Community College Building
202) 225-2965 2323N. Broadway, Suite 319
SantaAna, CA92706
714) 559-6190
Unsubscribefromfuturemessages.
9 Susana Barrios
From: jodiemosley <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] Thank you
Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

ThankyouRyanBaliusforeverythingyouaretryingtodoforwestAnaheim.

ItisSOhardfightingthiscorruptsystem, andIjustwanttorecognizeyourefforts.

Iwishdesperately districtonewasmoremorefocusedonbythewholecity, butIdoseewhatyouare doing, andrespectit.

Goodluck!
JodieMosley
SentfrommyGalaxy
1 Susana Barrios
From: jodiemosley <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] Prostitutes onbeach andball
Attachments: 20260412_110845.jpg
Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

Wearesickofthis. POURYOURENERGYINTODISTRICTONE. RyanBaliusistrying. Buthecan'tdoit ALONE.

SentfrommyGalaxy
1 Susana Barrios
From: CraigADurfey <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, April
To: CraigADurfey; senator umberg; DevonAtkinson; [email protected]; Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

Forwardedmessage ---------
From: CraigDurfey <
Date: Sat, Apr11, 2026at12:21AM
Subject: Screentime
To:
https://www.facebook.com/reel/972153234767657?fs=e&mibextid=wwXIfr&fs=e SentfrommyiPhone
1 Susana Barrios
From: CraigADurfey <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, April
To: CraigADurfey; [email protected]; [email protected]; CITYCOUNCIL; Public school cellphone bansfallshort
Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

Forwardedmessage ---------
From: CraigADurfey <
Date: Thu, Apr16, 2026at12:23PM
Subject: SharingCaliforniastudentsauthornew ‘digitalwellness’ bill, sayschoolcellphonebansfall short
To: CraigDurfey < MaureenBlackmun <
IthoughtyouwouldwanttoseethisinterestingstoryfromEdSource: https://edsource.org/?p=755990 1 Susana Barrios
From: LoriHughes <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, April
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] Festival CenterProject
Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

ToCouncilMemberswhovotedforFestivalCenterdevelopment:

Youallknowwhatyoudidiswrong!!! AnaheimHillshasalreadyfulfilleditshousingrequirements, even beyondatleasttwootherdistricts! YourdecisiontoputtheAnaheimHillsresidentsatevengreaterrisk whenwefaceanotherwildfireisunconscionable!!! Please, please, reversecourse! Donotallowthis SheaapartmentcomplextobebuiltatFestivalCenter. Builditsomewheresaferinourdistrict. Please!!!! Howcouldyoueventhinkit’sokaytobuilditinthemiddleofaseverefiredangerzonewhenitalready takesthreehourstogo1/4ofamileduringanevacuation!
Pleasestopthisprojectfromgoingforward! Youhaveto!!!!! Thisisnotfunandgamesforthoseofuswho livehere. Thisislifeanddeath!!!
Pleasesearchyoursoulsanddotherightthingforus. Stopthisprojectnow!!! Thisprojectiswrongfor Festivalonsomanylevels. Donotallowthis!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Regards,
LoriHughes
1 Susana Barrios
From: LoriHughes <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, April
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] Anaheim Hillsfiredestroys homes - ABC7LosAngeles Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

AnaheimHillsfiredestroyshomes - ABC7LosAngeles
https://abc7.com/videoClip/2512964/
1 Susana Barrios
From: LoriHughes <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April20, 20268:10AM
To: PublicComment <[email protected]>
Subject: \[EXTERNAL\] Re: FestivalCenterhighriseapartment complex.

Warning: This email originated from outside theCityofAnaheim. Donotclick links oropen attachments unless you recognize thesender andareexpecting themessage.
1 Susana Barrios
From: KhueBui <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday,
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] Release thefootage andautopsy! FireAlbertArzola'skillers! Youdon'toftengetemailfrom Learnwhythisisimportant
Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

MayorAitkenandMembersoftheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtodemandjusticeforAlbertArzola, whowaskilledbypolice. Idemandthereleaseofthefull, uneditedbodycamerafootagefromeveryofficerinvolved, theimmediatereleaseoftheautopsyreport, thedisclosureoftheofficers’ names, andtheimmediateterminationoftheofficerwhofatallyshot Albert.

AlbertwasambushedbytwoAnaheimPDofficerswhojumpedoutofanunmarkedvehicleandchased himtohisownhome. Oneofficershothimintheback, killinghiminfrontofhisfamily. Theofficersthen threatenedtoshoothisfamilyandheldthematthesceneforhours. Theydelayedprovidingmedicalcare fortenminutesanddraggedAlbert’slifelessbodyontothesidewalk.

Alberthaddonenothingwrongandposednothreattoanyone. Hewasonly19yearsoldandhadrecently graduatedfromKatellaHighSchool. Hewasahardworking residentofAnaheimwhotookprideinhisjob anddreamedofacareerinculinaryarts. Hewasabelovedson, familymember, andfriendwithabright futureaheadofhim. Albertshouldstillbealivetoday.

Idemandthefullbodycamerafootagefromallofficersatthescene. Idemandthereleaseoftheautopsy report. Idemandthenamesoftheofficersinvolved. AndIdemandthattheofficerwhoshotAlbertbe firedimmediately.

JusticeforAlbertArzola!
KhueBui
1 Susana Barrios
From: Sonya Lopez <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] Nomore silence! Justice forAlbertArzola! Youdon'to?engetemailfrom Learnwhythisisimportantat
h?ps://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIden?ca?on \]
Warning: Thisemailoriginated fromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropena?achments unlessyou recognize thesenderandareexpec?ngthemessage.

MayorAitkenandMembersoftheAnaheimCityCouncil,
Iamwri?ngtodemandjus?ceforthepolicekillingofAlbertArzola. Idemand thefull, unedited bodycamerafootage fromallocers, theimmediate releaseoftheautopsyreport, thenamesoftheocersinvolved, andtheimmediate ringoftheocerwhoshotAlberttodeath.

Albertwasambushed bytwoAnaheimPDocerswholeaptoutofanunmarked vehicleandchasedhimtohishouse.

Oneocershothimintheback, killinghiminfrontofhisfamily. Theythreatened toshoothisfamilyandthendetained thematthesceneforhours. Theydelayedmedicala?en?onfortenminutesanddraggedAlbert’slifelessbodyontothe sidewalk.

Albertwasdoingnothingwrongandwasnotathreattoanyone. Hewasonly19-years-oldandrecentlygraduated from KatellaHighSchool. Hewasahard-workingresidentofAnaheimwhotookprideinhisjobandaspiredtoacareerin culinaryarts. Hewasabelovedson, familymemberandfriendwithabrightfutureaheadofhim. Albertshouldbealive today!
Idemandthefullbodycamerafootageofallocersfromtheincident. Idemandthereleaseoftheautopsyreport. I demandthenamesoftheocersinvolved. AndIdemandthattheocerwhoshotAlbertberedimmediately.

Jus?ceforAlbertArzola!
SonyaLopez
SentfrommyiPhone
1 Susana Barrios
From: ErikaArmenta <erikaarmenta994@gmail. com>
Sent: Tuesday, April
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] Nomore silence! Justice forAlbertArzola! Youdon'toftengetemailfrom Learnwhythisisimportant
Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

MayorAitkenandMembersoftheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtodemandjusticeforthepolicekillingofAlbertArzola. Idemandthefull, uneditedbody camerafootagefromallofficers, theimmediatereleaseoftheautopsyreport, thenamesoftheofficers involved, andtheimmediatefiringoftheofficerwhoshotAlberttodeath.

AlbertwasambushedbytwoAnaheimPDofficerswholeaptoutofanunmarkedvehicleandchasedhim tohishouse. Oneofficershothimintheback, killinghiminfrontofhisfamily. Theythreatenedtoshoot hisfamilyandthendetainedthematthesceneforhours. Theydelayedmedicalattentionfortenminutes anddraggedAlbert’slifelessbodyontothesidewalk.

Albertwasdoingnothingwrongandwasnotathreattoanyone. Hewasonly19-years-oldandrecently graduatedfromKatellaHighSchool. Hewasahard-workingresidentofAnaheimwhotookprideinhisjob andaspiredtoacareerinculinaryarts. Hewasabelovedson, familymemberandfriendwithabright futureaheadofhim. Albertshouldbealivetoday!
Idemandthefullbodycamerafootageofallofficersfromtheincident. Idemandthereleaseofthe autopsyreport. Idemandthenamesoftheofficersinvolved. AndIdemandthattheofficerwhoshot Albertbefiredimmediately.

JusticeforAlbertArzola!
1 Susana Barrios
From: DavidPulido <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] Nomore silence! Justice forAlbertArzola! Youdon'toftengetemailfrom Learnwhythisisimportant
Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

MayorAitkenandMembersoftheAnaheimCityCouncil,
IamwritingtodemandjusticeforthepolicekillingofAlbertArzola. Idemandthefull, uneditedbody camerafootagefromallofficers, theimmediatereleaseoftheautopsyreport, thenamesoftheofficers involved, andtheimmediatefiringoftheofficerwhoshotAlberttodeath.

AlbertwasambushedbytwoAnaheimPDofficerswholeaptoutofanunmarkedvehicleandchasedhim tohishouse. Oneofficershothimintheback, killinghiminfrontofhisfamily. Theythreatenedtoshoot hisfamilyandthendetainedthematthesceneforhours. Theydelayedmedicalattentionfortenminutes anddraggedAlbert’slifelessbodyontothesidewalk.

Albertwasdoingnothingwrongandwasnotathreattoanyone. Hewasonly19-years-oldandrecently graduatedfromKatellaHighSchool. Hewasahard-workingresidentofAnaheimwhotookprideinhisjob andaspiredtoacareerinculinaryarts. Hewasabelovedson, familymemberandfriendwithabright futureaheadofhim. Albertshouldbealivetoday!
Idemandthefullbodycamerafootageofallofficersfromtheincident. Idemandthereleaseofthe autopsyreport. Idemandthenamesoftheofficersinvolved. AndIdemandthattheofficerwhoshot Albertbefiredimmediately.

JusticeforAlbertArzola!
1 Susana Barrios
From: Matthew Compton <matthewdcompton42@gmail. com>
Sent: Tuesday, April21,
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] Nomore silence! Justice forAlbertArzola! Youdon'toftengetemailfrom Learnwhythisisimportant
Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

MayorAitkenandMembersoftheAnaheimCityCouncil, Iamwritingtodemandjusticeforthepolice killingofAlbertArzola. Idemandthefull, uneditedbodycamerafootagefromallofficers, theimmediate releaseoftheautopsyreport, thenamesoftheofficersinvolved, andtheimmediatefiringoftheofficer whoshotAlberttodeath. AlbertwasambushedbytwoAnaheimPDofficerswholeaptoutofan unmarkedvehicleandchasedhimtohishouse. Oneofficershothimintheback, killinghiminfrontofhis family. Theythreatenedtoshoothisfamilyandthendetainedthematthesceneforhours. Theydelayed medicalattentionfortenminutesanddraggedAlbert’slifelessbodyontothesidewalk. Albertwasdoing nothingwrongandwasnotathreattoanyone. Hewasonly19-years-oldandrecentlygraduatedfrom KatellaHighSchool. Hewasahard-workingresidentofAnaheimwhotookprideinhisjobandaspiredto acareerinculinaryarts. Hewasabelovedson, familymemberandfriendwithabrightfutureaheadof him. Albertshouldbealivetoday! Idemandthefullbodycamerafootageofallofficersfromtheincident.

Idemandthereleaseoftheautopsyreport. Idemandthenamesoftheofficersinvolved. AndIdemand thattheofficerwhoshotAlbertbefiredimmediately. JusticeforAlbertArzola! 1 Susana Barrios
From: Johanna Lopez <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 202611:48AM
To: Public Comment
Cc: orangecountycso@gmail. com
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] Comment Re: Justice forAlbertArzola Youdon'toftengetemail fromkeonianalo@gmail. com. Learnwhythisisimportant Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

IamthemotherofBrandonLopez, andIwaspresentthedaymysonwaskilledbyAnaheimpolice.

Whathappenedtomysonwasnotasplit-seconddecision. Itunfoldedovertime, withopportunities to slowthingsdown, tocommunicate, andtochooseadifferentoutcome. Mysonwasunarmed, andyet deadlyforcewasused.

Weweretoldthatlessonswouldbelearned—thatchangesintrainingandtacticswouldcomefromhis death.

Butyearslater, inthecaseofAlbertArzola, wearehearingthesamethingsagain: questionsabout whetheraweaponwaspresent, rapidescalation, andalackofclearde-escalation.

SoIamaskingplainly: whathasactuallychanged?
Wherearetheimprovements inthreatassessment, incrisisresponse, intheuseoftimeanddistanceto preventlossoflife? Whyarefamiliesstillleftwiththesameunansweredquestions? Myson’slifeshouldhaveledtomeaningfulreform. Instead, weareseeingthesamepatternsrepeat.

Iamaskingthiscounciltodemandrealaccountabilityandtoensurethatchangesarenotjustpromised, butproven.

JohannaLopez
1 Susana Barrios
From: GraceArzola <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 202612:08PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] Nomore silence! Justice forAlbertArzola! Youdon'[email protected]. Learnwhythisisimportantat h?ps://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIden?ca?on \]
Warning: Thisemailoriginated fromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropena?achments unlessyou recognize thesenderandareexpec?ngthemessage.

MayorAitkenandMembersoftheAnaheimCityCouncil,
Iamwri?ngtodemandjus?ceforthepolicekillingofAlbertArzola. Idemand thefull, unedited bodycamerafootage fromallocers, theimmediate releaseoftheautopsyreport, thenamesoftheocersinvolved, andtheimmediate ringoftheocerwhoshotAlberttodeath.

Albertwasambushed bytwoAnaheimPDocerswholeaptoutofanunmarked vehicleandchasedhimtohishouse.

Oneocershothimintheback, killinghiminfrontofhisfamily. Theythreatened toshoothisfamilyandthendetained thematthesceneforhours. Theydelayedmedicala?en?onfortenminutesanddraggedAlbert’slifelessbodyontothe sidewalk.

Albertwasdoingnothingwrongandwasnotathreattoanyone. Hewasonly19-years-oldandrecentlygraduated from KatellaHighSchool. Hewasahard-workingresidentofAnaheimwhotookprideinhisjobandaspiredtoacareerin culinaryarts. Hewasabelovedson, familymemberandfriendwithabrightfutureaheadofhim. Albertshouldbealive today!
Idemandthefullbodycamerafootageofallocersfromtheincident. Idemandthereleaseoftheautopsyreport. I demandthenamesoftheocersinvolved. AndIdemandthattheocerwhoshotAlbertberedimmediately.

Jus?ceforAlbertArzola!
Respec?ully,
GraceArzola
1 Susana Barrios
From: Teresa Cortez <teresacortez433@gmail. com>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 202612:15PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] Nomore silence! Justice forAlbertArzola! Youdon'[email protected]. Learnwhythisisimportantat h?ps://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIden?ca?on \]
Warning: Thisemailoriginated fromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropena?achments unlessyou recognize thesenderandareexpec?ngthemessage.

MayorAitkenandMembersoftheAnaheimCityCouncil,
Iamwri?ngtodemandjus?ceforthepolicekillingofAlbertArzola. Idemand thefull, unedited bodycamerafootage fromallocers, theimmediate releaseoftheautopsyreport, thenamesoftheocersinvolved, andtheimmediate ringoftheocerwhoshotAlberttodeath.

Albertwasambushed bytwoAnaheimPDocerswholeaptoutofanunmarked vehicleandchasedhimtohishouse.

Oneocershothimintheback, killinghiminfrontofhisfamily. Theythreatened toshoothisfamilyandthendetained thematthesceneforhours. Theydelayedmedicala?en?onfortenminutesanddraggedAlbert’slifelessbodyontothe sidewalk.

Albertwasdoingnothingwrongandwasnotathreattoanyone. Hewasonly19-years-oldandrecentlygraduated from KatellaHighSchool. Hewasahard-workingresidentofAnaheimwhotookprideinhisjobandaspiredtoacareerin culinaryarts. Hewasabelovedson, familymemberandfriendwithabrightfutureaheadofhim. Albertshouldbealive today!
Idemandthefullbodycamerafootageofallocersfromtheincident. Idemandthereleaseoftheautopsyreport. I demandthenamesoftheocersinvolved. AndIdemandthattheocerwhoshotAlbertberedimmediately.

Jus?ceforAlbertArzola!
SentfrommyiPhone
1 Susana Barrios
From: Cynthia Cortez <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 202612:19PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] Nomore silence! Justice forAlbertArzola! Youdon'[email protected]. Learnwhythisisimportantat h?ps://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIden?ca?on \]
Warning: Thisemailoriginated fromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropena?achments unlessyou recognize thesenderandareexpec?ngthemessage.

MayorAitkenandMembersoftheAnaheimCityCouncil,
Iamwri?ngtodemandjus?ceforthepolicekillingofAlbertArzola. Idemand thefull, unedited bodycamerafootage fromallocers, theimmediate releaseoftheautopsyreport, thenamesoftheocersinvolved, andtheimmediate ringoftheocerwhoshotAlberttodeath.

Albertwasambushed bytwoAnaheimPDocerswholeaptoutofanunmarked vehicleandchasedhimtohishouse.

Oneocershothimintheback, killinghiminfrontofhisfamily. Theythreatened toshoothisfamilyandthendetained thematthesceneforhours. Theydelayedmedicala?en?onfortenminutesanddraggedAlbert’slifelessbodyontothe sidewalk.

Albertwasdoingnothingwrongandwasnotathreattoanyone. Hewasonly19-years-oldandrecentlygraduated from KatellaHighSchool. Hewasahard-workingresidentofAnaheimwhotookprideinhisjobandaspiredtoacareerin culinaryarts. Hewasabelovedson, familymemberandfriendwithabrightfutureaheadofhim. Albertshouldbealive today!
Idemandthefullbodycamerafootageofallocersfromtheincident. Idemandthereleaseoftheautopsyreport. I demandthenamesoftheocersinvolved. AndIdemandthattheocerwhoshotAlbertberedimmediately.

Jus?ceforAlbertArzola!
SentfrommyiPhone
1 Susana Barrios
From: Stephanie Arzola <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 202612:30PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] Nomore silence! Justice forAlbertArzola! Youdon'[email protected]. Learnwhythisisimportantat h?ps://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIden?ca?on \]
Warning: Thisemailoriginated fromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropena?achments unlessyou recognize thesenderandareexpec?ngthemessage.

MayorAitkenandMembersoftheAnaheimCityCouncil,
Iamwri?ngtodemandjus?ceforthepolicekillingofAlbertArzola. Idemand thefull, unedited bodycamerafootage fromallocers, theimmediate releaseoftheautopsyreport, thenamesoftheocersinvolved, andtheimmediate ringoftheocerwhoshotAlberttodeath.

Albertwasambushed bytwoAnaheimPDocerswholeaptoutofanunmarked vehicleandchasedhimtohishouse.

Oneocershothimintheback, killinghiminfrontofhisfamily. Theythreatened toshoothisfamilyandthendetained thematthesceneforhours. Theydelayedmedicala?en?onfortenminutesanddraggedAlbert’slifelessbodyontothe sidewalk.

Albertwasdoingnothingwrongandwasnotathreattoanyone. Hewasonly19-years-oldandrecentlygraduated from KatellaHighSchool. Hewasahard-workingresidentofAnaheimwhotookprideinhisjobandaspiredtoacareerin culinaryarts. Hewasabelovedson, familymemberandfriendwithabrightfutureaheadofhim. Albertshouldbealive today!
Idemandthefullbodycamerafootageofallocersfromtheincident. Idemandthereleaseoftheautopsyreport. I demandthenamesoftheocersinvolved. AndIdemandthattheocerwhoshotAlbertberedimmediately.

Jus?ceforAlbertArzola!
SentfrommyiPhone
1 Susana Barrios
From: PearlArzola <arzolapearl13@icloud. com>
Sent: Tuesday, April
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] Nomore silence! Justice forAlbertArzola! Youdon'to?engetemailfrom Learnwhythisisimportantat
h?ps://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIden?ca?on \]
Warning: Thisemailoriginated fromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropena?achments unlessyou recognize thesenderandareexpec?ngthemessage.

MayorAitkenandMembersoftheAnaheimCityCouncil,
Iamwri?ngtodemandjus?ceforthepolicekillingofAlbertArzola. Idemand thefull, unedited bodycamerafootage fromallocers, theimmediate releaseoftheautopsyreport, thenamesoftheocersinvolved, andtheimmediate ringoftheocerwhoshotAlberttodeath.

Albertwasambushed bytwoAnaheimPDocerswholeaptoutofanunmarked vehicleandchasedhimtohishouse.

Oneocershothimintheback, killinghiminfrontofhisfamily. Theythreatened toshoothisfamilyandthendetained thematthesceneforhours. Theydelayedmedicala?en?onfortenminutesanddraggedAlbert’slifelessbodyontothe sidewalk.

Albertwasdoingnothingwrongandwasnotathreattoanyone. Hewasonly19-years-oldandrecentlygraduated from KatellaHighSchool. Hewasahard-workingresidentofAnaheimwhotookprideinhisjobandaspiredtoacareerin culinaryarts. Hewasabelovedson, familymemberandfriendwithabrightfutureaheadofhim. Albertshouldbealive today!
Idemandthefullbodycamerafootageofallocersfromtheincident. Idemandthereleaseoftheautopsyreport. I demandthenamesoftheocersinvolved. AndIdemandthattheocerwhoshotAlbertberedimmediately.

Jus?ceforAlbertArzola!
SentfrommyiPhone
1 Susana Barrios
From: ArianaAvalos <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] Nomore silence! Justice forAlbertArzola! Youdon'toftengetemailfrom Learnwhythisisimportant
Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

MayorAitkenandMembersoftheAnaheimCityCouncil, Iamwritingtodemandjusticeforthepolice killingofAlbertArzola. Idemandthefull, uneditedbodycamerafootagefromallofficers, theimmediate releaseoftheautopsyreport, thenamesoftheofficersinvolved, andtheimmediatefiringoftheofficer whoshotAlberttodeath. AlbertwasambushedbytwoAnaheimPDofficerswholeaptoutofan unmarkedvehicleandchasedhimtohishouse. Oneofficershothimintheback, killinghiminfrontofhis family. Theythreatenedtoshoothisfamilyandthendetainedthematthesceneforhours. Theydelayed medicalattentionfortenminutesanddraggedAlbert’slifelessbodyontothesidewalk. Albertwasdoing nothingwrongandwasnotathreattoanyone. Hewasonly19-years-oldandrecentlygraduatedfrom KatellaHighSchool. Hewasahard-workingresidentofAnaheimwhotookprideinhisjobandaspiredto acareerinculinaryarts. Hewasabelovedson, familymemberandfriendwithabrightfutureaheadof him. Albertshouldbealivetoday! Idemandthefullbodycamerafootageofallofficersfromtheincident.

Idemandthereleaseoftheautopsyreport. Idemandthenamesoftheofficersinvolved. AndIdemand thattheofficerwhoshotAlbertbefiredimmediately. JusticeforAlbertArzola! 1 Susana Barrios
From: stephanie dorantes <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, April21, 2026
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] Nomore silence! Justice forAlbertArzola! Youdon'to?engetemailfrom Learnwhythisisimportantat
h?ps://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIden?ca?on \]
Warning: Thisemailoriginated fromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropena?achments unlessyou recognize thesenderandareexpec?ngthemessage.

MayorAitkenandMembersoftheAnaheimCityCouncil,
Iamwri?ngtodemandjus?ceforthepolicekillingofAlbertArzola. Idemand thefull, unedited bodycamerafootage fromallocers, theimmediate releaseoftheautopsyreport, thenamesoftheocersinvolved, andtheimmediate ringoftheocerwhoshotAlberttodeath.

Albertwasambushed bytwoAnaheimPDocerswholeaptoutofanunmarked vehicleandchasedhimtohishouse.

Oneocershothimintheback, killinghiminfrontofhisfamily. Theythreatened toshoothisfamilyandthendetained thematthesceneforhours. Theydelayedmedicala?en?onfortenminutesanddraggedAlbert’slifelessbodyontothe sidewalk.

Albertwasdoingnothingwrongandwasnotathreattoanyone. Hewasonly19-years-oldandrecentlygraduated from KatellaHighSchool. Hewasahard-workingresidentofAnaheimwhotookprideinhisjobandaspiredtoacareerin culinaryarts. Hewasabelovedson, familymemberandfriendwithabrightfutureaheadofhim. Albertshouldbealive today!
Idemandthefullbodycamerafootageofallocersfromtheincident. Idemandthereleaseoftheautopsyreport. I demandthenamesoftheocersinvolved. AndIdemandthattheocerwhoshotAlbertberedimmediately.

Jus?ceforAlbertArzola!
Sincerely,
Stephanie Dorantes
1 Susana Barrios
From: BaacGarcia <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 20263:15PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] Nomore silence! Justice forAlbertArzola! Youdon'[email protected]. Learnwhythisisimportantat h?ps://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIden?ca?on \]
Warning: Thisemailoriginated fromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropena?achments unlessyou recognize thesenderandareexpec?ngthemessage.

MayorAitkenandMembersoftheAnaheimCityCouncil,
Iamwri?ngtodemandjus?ceforthepolicekillingofAlbertArzola. Idemand thefull, unedited bodycamerafootage fromallocers, theimmediate releaseoftheautopsyreport, thenamesoftheocersinvolved, andtheimmediate ringoftheocerwhoshotAlberttodeath.

Albertwasambushed bytwoAnaheimPDocerswholeaptoutofanunmarked vehicleandchasedhimtohishouse.

Oneocershothimintheback, killinghiminfrontofhisfamily. Theythreatened toshoothisfamilyandthendetained thematthesceneforhours. Theydelayedmedicala?en?onfortenminutesanddraggedAlbert’slifelessbodyontothe sidewalk.

Albertwasdoingnothingwrongandwasnotathreattoanyone. Hewasonly19-years-oldandrecentlygraduated from KatellaHighSchool. Hewasahard-workingresidentofAnaheimwhotookprideinhisjobandaspiredtoacareerin culinaryarts. Hewasabelovedson, familymemberandfriendwithabrightfutureaheadofhim. Albertshouldbealive today!
Idemandthefullbodycamerafootageofallocersfromtheincident. Idemandthereleaseoftheautopsyreport. I demandthenamesoftheocersinvolved. AndIdemandthattheocerwhoshotAlbertberedimmediately.

Jus?ceforAlbertArzola!
1 Susana Barrios
From: PeterArzola <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 20267:48PM
To: Public Comment
Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\] Nomore silence! Justice forAlbertArzola! Youdon'to?engetemailfrom Learnwhythisisimportantat
h?ps://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIden?ca?on \]
Warning: Thisemailoriginated fromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropena?achments unlessyou recognize thesenderandareexpec?ngthemessage.

MayorAitkenandMembersoftheAnaheimCityCouncil,
Iamwri?ngtodemandjus?ceforthepolicekillingofAlbertArzola. Idemand thefull, unedited bodycamerafootage fromallocers, theimmediate releaseoftheautopsyreport, thenamesoftheocersinvolved, andtheimmediate ringoftheocerwhoshotAlberttodeath.

Albertwasambushed bytwoAnaheimPDocerswholeaptoutofanunmarked vehicleandchasedhimtohishouse.

Oneocershothimintheback, killinghiminfrontofhisfamily. Theythreatened toshoothisfamilyandthendetained thematthesceneforhours. Theydelayedmedicala?en?onfortenminutesanddraggedAlbert’slifelessbodyontothe sidewalk.

Albertwasdoingnothingwrongandwasnotathreattoanyone. Hewasonly19-years-oldandrecentlygraduated from KatellaHighSchool. Hewasahard-workingresidentofAnaheimwhotookprideinhisjobandaspiredtoacareerin culinaryarts. Hewasabelovedson, familymemberandfriendwithabrightfutureaheadofhim. Albertshouldbealive today!
Idemandthefullbodycamerafootageofallocersfromtheincident. Idemandthereleaseoftheautopsyreport. I demandthenamesoftheocersinvolved. AndIdemandthattheocerwhoshotAlbertberedimmediately.

Jus?ceforAlbertArzola!
SentfrommyiPhone
1 Susana Barrios
From: Bobby <boleajuly2022@gmail. com>
Sent: Tuesday, April21, 20267:51PM
To: RyanBalius; Ashleigh Aitken; CarlosA. Leon; Norma C. Kurtz; Natalie Rubalcava; Public Comment; SjanyLarson-Cash; Audrey Lujan; Kristen Maahs; Natalie Meeks Subject:\[ EXTERNAL\]
Youdon'[email protected]. Learnwhythisisimportant Warning: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsidetheCityofAnaheim. Donotclicklinksoropen attachmentsunlessyourecognizethesenderandareexpectingthemessage.

GoodeveningeveryoneIhaveasuggestionofoneofmymanysuggestions. It’stimetoopenthelibrary anhourearly11AMisnotfishingintheImeant. I’mworriedthedayswhenIwasopen9to9. My suggestionforhoursisforcentralLibraryduringtheweekMondaythroughFriday10AMto8PM Inforall theotherlibrariesinthecity11AMbasicallyinthemorninggonealreadyit’smainlyopenintheafternoon enoughwiththe11AMopeningforthenextyouguysshouldconsideropeningthelibraryat10. Thankyou foryourtime.
1

← All documents from this meeting