Anaheim City Council
July 28, 2026

ANAHEIM CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 12, 2026
The regular meeting of May 12, 2026 was called to order at 4:00 P.M. in the Council Chamber of Anaheim City Hall, located at 200 South Anaheim Boulevard. The meeting notice, agenda, and related material were duly posted on May 7, 2026.

MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ashleigh E. Aitken and Council Members Carlos A. Leon, Ryan Balius, Natalie Rubalcava, Norma Campos Kurtz, and Natalie Meeks.

Council Member Kristen M. Maahs joined the meeting during Closed Session.

STAFF PRESENT: Interim City Manager Greg Garcia, City Attorney Robert Fabela, and City Clerk Theresa Bass
ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO CLOSED SESSION: None
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS: None
CLOSED SESSION: At 4:00 p.m., Mayor Aitken recessed to closed session for consideration of the following:

1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
(Subdivision (a) of Section 54957.6 of the California Government Code) Agency Designated Representative: Linda Andal, Human Resources Director Name of Employee Organizations: Anaheim Municipal Employees Association, Police Cadet Unit

2. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
(Subdivision (a) of Section 54957.6 of the California Government Code) Agency Designated Representative: Linda Andal, Human Resources Director Name of Employee Organizations: Service Employees’ International Union, United Service Workers West
At 5:00 p.m., Mayor Aitken reconvened the Anaheim City Council.

MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ashleigh E. Aitken and Council Members Carlos A. Leon, Ryan Balius, Natalie Rubalcava, Norma Campos Kurtz, Kristen M. Maahs, and Natalie Meeks
INVOCATION: Reverend Jessica Strysko, Anaheim United Methodist Church Council Member Meeks recognized the Memorial Day holiday by honoring the men and women who gave their lives in service to the nation and encouraged reflection with gratitude, humility, and a renewed commitment to community and country.

FLAG SALUTE: Council Member Natalie Meeks
City Council Minutes of May 12, 2026

PRESENTATIONS: Recognizing Steve Carroll, the Anaheim Ducks broadcaster, who is retiring after a 50-year career (27 seasons with the Ducks)
Mayor Aitken recognized Anaheim Ducks broadcaster Steve Carroll for being the voice of 27 years.

She shared that he is concluding a 50-year broadcast career as he starts a new chapter with a well- earned retirement. She stated that he has called radio play-by-play for more than 2,000 Ducks games, including the 2007 Stanley Cup championship. She shared that he is known for his steady, trusty voice, and the energy, excitement, and drama of the games he has called. She noted that he is part of a generation of broadcasters that includes greats Vin Scully, Dick Enberg, and others who defined sports for a generation. She added that he has also worked for the Angels, co-hosting “Angels Today” and “This Week in Angels Baseball” in 2011. She shared that Mr. Carroll, a St. Louis native, began his career in 1976 calling college basketball in Missouri. She added that for a time in the 1990’s, he was the voice of the Philadelphia Flyers. She announced that Mr. Carroll was inducted into the Southern California Sports Broadcasters Hall of Fame. On behalf of the City, she thanked him for the incredible role that he played in Anaheim’s professional sports.

Steve Carroll expressed gratitude for the City's recognition upon his retirement after a 55-year broadcasting career, reflecting on his time with the Anaheim Ducks and the opportunity to serve the Anaheim community. He spoke about the fulfillment of working in professional hockey, praised the dedication of first responders and public servants, and thanked the Ducks organization, its ownership, and the Anaheim community for their support throughout his career. He expressed his desire to remain involved with the Ducks organization and offered to continue supporting community events as an emcee. He thanked the City for the recognition and expressed enthusiasm for the Ducks’ playoff run.

Recognizing Canyon High School’s Connor Shim who has been named a semifinalist in the Music Center’s 38th Annual Spotlight Program Mayor Aitken shared that Connor Shim is an accomplished classical musician who will be performing at the Walt Disney Concert Hall in downtown Los Angeles on Saturday, May 16. She stated that he is a junior at Canyon High School who has played the oboe for nearly a decade. She noted that his skill on the woodwind instrument has led him to be a grand finalist in the Music Center’s 38th Annual Spotlight Program, a nationally recognized performing arts showcase by the Music Center in Los Angeles. She shared that he has been part of the Canyon High School orchestra and marching band for his entire high school career. She added that he also performs with the Pacific Symphony Orchestra in Costa Mesa. She stated that he faced the difficult choice of giving up his other love, playing hockey, which he did for a decade. She shared that music is a source of ongoing joy and happiness for him.

Connor Shim thanked the City Council for the recognition.

Recognizing the Anaheim Police Department for participating in the 2026 Baker 2 Vegas Challenge Cup Relay receiving First place in their category and Fifth place overall
Mayor Aitken recognized the Anaheim Police Department 2026 Baker 2 Vegas Team. She shared that in March, the team participated in the Baker to Vegas, 120-mile relay race through the desert in Las Vegas. She stated that it is the largest law enforcement event of its kind, drawing teams from local, regional, state, and federal agencies. She reported that the team earned first place in their category and fifth overall, making the team the fastest in Orange County. She stated that the Elite team is made up of 20 officers and staff who have trained for months, including runs at Servite High School. She noted that the team’s Baker to Vegas performance reflects the dedication, commitment, and pursuit of excellence they bring to the community.

City Council Minutes of May 12, 2026

The Anaheim Police Department 2026 Baker 2 Vegas Team and Chief of Police Manuel Cid accepted the recognition. The team captain recognized the dedication of the team. He noted that the department placed fifth overall among more than 270 competing teams despite having a significantly smaller workforce than the top four finishers. He expressed pride in the team's achievement and optimism about improving their standing in next year's competition.

ACCEPTANCE OF OTHER RECOGNITIONS (To be presented at a later date):

Recognizing April 28, 2026, as Workers’ Memorial Day
Albert Munoz with SMART Local Union 170 Sheet Metal Workers highlighted workplace safety concerns facing construction and trades workers, including heat illness, silica dust exposure, machinery-related injuries, ergonomic hazards, electrical risks, and falls. He emphasized the importance of Cal/OSHA compliance, strong safety practices, and fostering a workplace culture that prioritizes employee health and well-being. He also recognized the work of the Southern California Coalition for Occupational Safety and Health in advocating for improved workplace safety standards, injury prevention, and worker education.

Recognizing May 16, 2026, as Kids to Parks Day
Recognizing May 22, 2026, as Harvey Milk Day
Recognizing May 11 – 17, 2026, as Bike to Work Week
Recognizing May 17 – 23, 2026, as National Public Works Week Recognizing May 2026, as Building Safety Month
Planning and Building Director Heather Allen introduced Building Official Scott Beery to accept the recognition and recognized his leadership of the Building Services Division since 2024. Director Allen highlighted the division's efforts to streamline permitting processes, improve communication with the development community, ensure code compliance, and collaborate with other City departments to serve residents and businesses. She also recognized Building Services staff in attendance and requested a group photo with the City Council in conjunction with the Building Safety Month proclamation.

Building Official Beery recognized May as Building Safety Month and emphasized the importance of modern building codes in ensuring safe, resilient, and functional buildings. He acknowledged the collaborative efforts of building safety professionals, fire prevention personnel, architects, engineers, contractors, and tradespeople in protecting the community. He also recognized the Building Services Division for its ongoing commitment to public safety, code compliance, accessibility, energy efficiency, and sustainable development. He invited the public to visit the Building Services Division's outreach booth at the Anaheim Farmers Market and requested a group photo with Building Services staff and the City Council.

Recognizing May 2026, as Mental Health Awareness Month
Recognizing May 2026, as National Cities, Towns, and Villages Month At 5:27 p.m., Mayor Aitken called to order the Anaheim Housing Authority, in joint session with the City Council.

ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDAS: None
City Council Minutes of May 12, 2026

PUBLIC COMMENTS (all agenda items): Prior to receipt of public comments, City Clerk Theresa Bass provided an outline of procedures for public comments, notice of translation services, and a brief decorum statement.

City Clerk Theresa Bass reported that a total of eight (8) public comments were received electronically prior to 3:00 P.M. [A final total of seventeen (17) public comments were received electronically, distributed to the City Council, and made part of the official records]. – See Appendix.

R. Joshua Collins expressed concerns regarding conditions at local homeless service providers, including allegations about sanitation practices, delayed medical care, inadequate case management, and lack of access to basic services. He stated that homeless individuals face barriers to participating in City Council meetings due to transportation and concerns about safeguarding their belongings, and suggested options such as transportation assistance, storage, remote public comment, or video submissions. He called for continued oversight of police practices and urged the City to pursue meaningful reforms to address concerns raised by the community.

Vern Nelson expressed support for Item No. 24, implementing remote public participation in compliance with Senate Bill (SB) 707 and amendments to the Brown Act. He stated that he advocated for remote public comment for several years, explaining it would improve accessibility for residents unable to attend meetings in person due to health, work, or family obligations. He recognized the death of Albert Arzola, noting his prior employment with the Anaheim Ducks. He mentioned the release of the name of the officer involved. He noted ongoing efforts related to a local rent control initiative and announced a community debate taking place at Anaheim High School.

Christine Lopez referenced a recent Los Angeles Times article regarding an excessive force lawsuit involving Anaheim police officers and expressed concern about allegations of prior officer conduct.

She urged the City to strengthen police accountability and oversight, stating that additional measures are needed to prevent future officer-involved deaths. She commented on the Police Review Board and advocated for greater community oversight of the Police Department to improve transparency and public trust.

David Pulido called for the termination of the officer involved in the shooting of Albert Arzola and urged the City to take action to increase police accountability. He criticized the City’s response to officer-involved shootings, referenced previous incidents involving Anaheim police officers, and expressed concerns about the outcomes of investigations into use-of-force cases. He concluded by urging the Council to take a public position on the matter and support greater accountability within the Police Department.

Pearl Arzola expressed support for the implementation of remote public comment but stated a preference for continuing to participate in City Council meetings in person. She commended Mayor Pro Tem Leon for visible engagement and improvements within District 2 and encouraged his reelection. She expressed concerns that other Council Members have not demonstrated sufficient community engagement or addressed neighborhood needs.

Grace Arzola urged the City Council to not only expand opportunities for public participation through remote comments but also to give meaningful consideration to residents' concerns. She expressed dissatisfaction with recent Council decisions, called for greater transparency regarding police-related matters, including information about officer conduct and surveillance technology, and urged the Council to provide more public information about the use of automated license plate reader cameras.

She encouraged the City Council to
City Council Minutes of May 12, 2026

Forrest Pollock shared challenges experienced by individuals experiencing homelessness. He requested that the City consider policies allowing unhoused residents to leave their belongings without fear of confiscation while attending appointments, working, or participating in City Council meetings, stating that repeated property loss makes it difficult to rebuild their lives. He advocated for shelter options that accommodate pets and couples, explaining that caring for a service animal limits his ability to access employment and services. He shared that he previously worked in automotive customization but is currently homeless. He requested that law enforcement and Code Enforcement focus on providing assistance rather than enforcement, alleging that unhoused individuals are frequently cited or displaced despite not engaging in criminal activity. He expressed concerns about Code Enforcement interaction involving a local business that provides mail and other assistance to homeless individuals, and urged the City to adopt a more supportive approach toward residents experiencing homelessness.

Amanda Lockwood shared that she resides at the Illumination Foundation shelter. She raised concerns about shelter policies and conditions. She requested accommodations for an emotional support animal and the ability to keep prescribed medications and vitamins in their room, stating both had been approved by a physician. She expressed additional concerns regarding the lack of water in a shower despite a maintenance request, an early curfew, and alleged harassment by a security guard. She commented on staffing levels and expressed concerns regarding access to case management services and accommodations for residents with diabetes. She stated that diabetic meal and snack options were inadequate, alleged delays in receiving insulin, and requested improvements to better address residents’ medical and dietary needs.

Danny Gonzalez expressed support for the family of Albert Arzola. He described him as a hardworking and valued member of the community. He alleged that the officer involved had a history of excessive force and stated that the force used in the incident was excessive. He raised concerns regarding the handling of the incident, including the release of body-worn camera footage, the status of the autopsy report, and the lack of accountability. He urged the City and Police Department to provide transparency and take action to ensure accountability and prevent similar incidents in the future.

Sergio Pelayo congratulated the City on the development of new affordable housing, noting the high cost of housing in Anaheim. He expressed support for the family of Albert Arzola and remote participation at City Council meetings. He criticized the conduct of the police investigation into Albert Arzola’s death. He stated that the officer had a history of excessive force. He questioned the status of the autopsy report, stating that the family has not received answers regarding his death. He noted that neighborhood surveillance footage had become a significant source of evidence and called for greater transparency and accountability in the investigation.

Card #7567 spoke in opposition to proposed public comment procedures under Item 24, arguing that reducing speaking time and imposing a public comment time limit would limit residents' ability to present detailed information on complex public safety and community issues, including wildfire evacuation, infrastructure, and development concerns. She stated that the proposed changes would disproportionately affect residents seeking to address significant community matters, including the family of Albert Arzola, Spanish-speaking residents, and individuals with disabilities. She urged the Council to reject the proposed public comment time limits, stating that they would reduce transparency, accountability, and meaningful public participation, and concluded by calling for continued attention to the Arzola family's requests for answers regarding the ongoing investigation.

Rosie Camacho shared her family’s grief over the death of her son, Albert Arzola. She alleged misconduct by the officer involved in the incident. She expressed concern that the officer remains employed by the City, called for greater transparency and accountability from the City and Police City Council Minutes of May 12, 2026

Department. She urged the Council to pursue justice and take steps to prevent similar incidents from occurring in the future.

Leslie Lopez expressed support for allowing remote public participation in City Council meetings but opposed limiting public comment, stating that the City should clearly explain the purpose of proposed procedural changes. She raised concerns that the changes could discourage public participation on important community issues. She commented on the death of her cousin Albert Arzola, alleging misconduct by the officer involved, and expressed concern that the officer remains assigned to the same neighborhood. She referenced a
Jesse Ben-Ron with the Orange County Business Council spoke in support of Item No. 22. He commended the City for developing an economic strategy and emphasized the importance of local economic development in supporting regional growth. He stated that a strategic plan would help guide business attraction, retention, and expansion efforts. He encouraged the Council to adopt the strategy, noting that it would help the City effectively align resources to support the local business community.

G. Price addressed Item No. 4, expressing opposition to the proposed professional services agreement for the City's fireworks display. She questioned the procurement process, noting that the agreement was not publicly advertised through the City's online bidding system and that the same vendor has been selected repeatedly. She raised environmental concerns, referencing prior allegations involving perchlorate contamination associated with the vendor's fireworks operations in other jurisdictions. She questioned the proximity of the fireworks display to the Santa Ana River and expressed concerns about potential impacts to water quality, air quality, and surrounding neighborhoods. She stated that the agreement lacked detailed provisions addressing environmental monitoring, debris cleanup, public health protections, and long-term environmental accountability, and urged the Council to seek additional information before approving the contract.

Marc Herbert expressed support for the family of Albert Arzola and discussed concerns regarding the City's handling of water quality issues and public transparency. He alleged that residents raising questions about drinking water quality had been dismissed and cited concerns involving water system operations, PFAS detections, well shutdown timing, laboratory reporting, and statements contained in the City's water quality report regarding unmet monitoring requirements. He raised concerns about government transparency and public participation, referencing prior Brown Act complaints, public records requests, Council Member attendance at meetings, and proposed reductions in public comment time under Item 24. He urged the City to improve transparency, responsiveness, and public engagement regarding both water quality and Council proceedings.

Mike Robbins addressed excavation safety practices, emphasizing the importance of complying with California's Dig Alert requirements to prevent utility strikes and protect workers, residents, and emergency responders. He referenced a gas line strike in Anaheim and expressed concerns that excavation work has proceeded without all required utility clearances, increasing the risk of serious injury or death. He alleged that employees who raised safety concerns or refused to participate in what they believed were unsafe practices experienced retaliation, including harassment, hostile work environments, and lost promotional opportunities. He urged the City to investigate workplace safety practices, report the number of Dig Alert violations and underground utility strikes, and strengthen accountability and transparency to ensure employee public safety.

Stephanie Mercadante expressed concerns regarding the City's organizational culture, alleging patterns of retaliation against Public Utilities employees who report safety concerns, excavation issues, and operational risks. She stated that employees responsible for maintaining critical infrastructure should be able to raise concerns without fear of adverse employment consequences.

City Council Minutes of May 12, 2026

She urged the City to support employees who report safety concerns, investigate allegations of retaliation, and hold management accountable when employee or public safety is compromised.

Jeanine Robbins questioned the City's assurances regarding drinking water quality, arguing that repeated statements that the water is safe do not adequately address residents' concerns. She stated they obtained records related to Well 51 through a Public Records Act request after challenging an initial request to sign a nondisclosure agreement. She alleged that residents experienced prolonged water flushing, discolored water, and operational issues involving a reservoir valve, claiming that employee safety concerns were ignored by management. She requested greater transparency regarding water quality, operational decisions, and regulatory compliance, and asked the City to provide a more detailed explanation of how it determined the water remained safe during the reported incidents.

Tom Fielder urged the City to increase transparency by releasing records related to water system operations, including flushing logs, hydrant records, SCADA data, operational timelines, internal communications, and excavation-related records. He questioned the City's handling of water quality issues, Well 51 operations, reported flushing activities, and communication with the City Council, and expressed concern about increased water rates. He alleged retaliation against employees who raise safety concerns and called for greater accountability and transparency regarding public infrastructure and justice for Albert Arzola.

Dave Duran expressed confidence that many City employees are committed to protecting drinking water quality but alleged that employees who raised operational and safety concerns faced retaliation or were ignored. He claimed City officials repeatedly assured the public that the water was safe while dismissing residents' concerns, and alleged that individuals questioning water quality were characterized negatively. He shared potential health risks associated with trihalomethanes (TTHMs), called for greater transparency regarding water quality issues, and concluded by requesting justice for Albert Arzola.

Major Ken Perine with The Salvation Army recognized National Salvation Army Week and shared several success stories from the Anaheim Emergency Shelter, highlighting residents who obtained employment, secured or were preparing to secure permanent housing, and made progress toward self-sufficiency. He emphasized the importance of shelter services, case management, and community support in helping individuals transition out of homelessness. He provided an update on The Salvation Army's upcoming CARI (Center for Applied Research) Building project, which will include a medical facility, expanded case management services, and a research center focused on improving homeless services, and thanked the City for its continued support.

Michele Mary, an Ambassador with the Disneyland Resort, provided updates on the Resort's community initiatives, including the completion of school-year programs supporting literacy and food distribution for Anaheim students and families. She announced that 22 Anaheim Union High School District students will participate in the AIME Summer Mentorship Program with Disney leaders. She provided additional updates, including the return of the Anaheim resident ticket offer, discounted summer children’s tickets, the upcoming “Happiest Day in Anaheim” community event, and plans to begin construction of the new East parking facility, with neighborhood outreach underway to keep nearby residents informed.

Ruben Greg Soto shared personal experiences with law enforcement and ongoing efforts to resolve a child support payment issue. He shared that he had contacted a member of Congress to encourage attention to community concerns regarding police conduct and accountability. He shared his current housing situation and expressed a desire to purchase a home in the future.

City Council Minutes of May 12, 2026

Art Castillo expressed concerns about e-bike safety involving children. He relayed a request from District 1 residents for vegetation maintenance at the Edison Field area due to fire concerns. He referenced past experiences involving police misconduct and whistleblower cases. He requested an opportunity to discuss his concerns further and expressed support for the family of Albert Arzola and called for justice.

Mazatl Tepehyolotzin acknowledged the traditional lands of the Tongva people and expressed support for federal recognition of the tribe. He discussed Native American history, preservation of ancestral remains, and advocated for the renaming of places tied to colonial history. He commented on broader issues, Indigenous rights and police accountability. He called for justice for Albert Arzola.

Ben Hurst with The Salvation Army highlighted the City’s partnership in developing the Center of Hope homeless services campus, noting achievements including shelter operations, meals served, counseling sessions, and permanent housing placements. He announced that the groundbreaking for the new Center for Applied Research and Innovation on June 16th. He stated that the Center would support homeless services locally and nationally, invited the Council to attend, and shared an example of how the Center's work inspired the creation of a nonprofit organization, thanking the City for its continued partnership and support.

Bryan Kaye criticized City leadership and the Police Department, alleging a lack of transparency and accountability regarding officer conduct and use-of-force incidents. He urged City officials to be more truthful and accountable in addressing public concerns.

COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS:

Council Member Maahs highlighted a new exhibit, “Concrete Wave” at Muzeo beginning April 25 through July 12, regarding the history of Vans and skateboarding history in Anaheim. She shared that in 1966, Paul Van Doren opened a small shoe factory at 704 East Broadway in Anaheim, which transformed into a cultural revolution. She noted that the exhibit celebrates Vans’ 60th Anniversary as the gateway to exploring Anaheim’s pivotal role in skateboarding, youth culture, and creative rebellion from local skate parks to a global phenomenon. She thanked Kelly from Muzeo, Catherine Acosta with Vans, and Jim Fitzpatrick and Todd Hubert with the Skateboarding Hall of Fame. She highlighted a photo at the opening of the Concrete Wave skate park and attendance by the Council at the time.

Council Member Maahs announced that on Friday, May 22nd, at Zion Lutheran Church, there would be a book discussion about automation and Disneyland by the Anaheim Historical Society with assistance from Heritage Services Manager Jane Newell. She stated that the event would be from 6 p.m. to 9 p.m. Council Member Maahs announced that on Saturday, May 23rd from 2 p.m. to 3 p.m., former Anaheim Police Officer Rick Martinez would be at the Sunkist Branch Library to share early Anaheim Police Department history. She congratulated and thanked the Community Services Department for hosting the well-attended Eco Fun Fair at Oak Canyon Nature Center on Saturday, May 9th.

Mayor Pro Tem Leon highlighted Parks Manager JJ Jimenez and the Parks team for improvements at Chaparral Park and ongoing improvements at Circle Park. He shared that he visited Magnolia High School and Loara High School to recognize seniors. He expressed appreciation for the warm welcome from the school administration, parents, and students. He highlighted the recognition of the Magnolia High School Sentinel of the Year and distinguished Loara High School volunteers who are graduating. Mayor Pro Tem Leon thanked Chris Wartnaby, Jared Martinez, and Public Utilities General Manager Dukku Lee for quickly addressing a request to replace outdated banners for a year- end celebration. Mayor Pro Tem Leon highlighted Scott Davis, head custodian at Walt Disney Elementary School, and former custodian at Maxwell Elementary, for his retirement after 40 years of service to the Magnolia School District. He shared that Mr. Davis was a student of the Magnolia School District and returned to work for the District. He thanked Mr. Davis, his family, and the entire City Council Minutes of May 12, 2026

Maxwell Elementary and Magnolia School District. Mayor Pro Tem Leon congratulated the graduating Class of 2026 from Savanna High School, Gilbert High School, Magnolia High School, Servite High School, and Loara High School. He expressed support for the Anaheim Ducks during Game 5 of the Playoffs.

Council Member Rubalcava highlighted the City’s continued focus on housing initiatives, including First-Time Homebuyer programs and housing assistance to those in the City. She recognized staff’s work, in collaboration with LINC Housing, to convert the Motel 6 off Harbor and the 91 freeway into permanent supportive housing. She reported that there are 87 units for individuals along with on-site supportive services, a community garden, and additional resources. She shared that herself, Mayor Aitken, and Council Member Balius met with residents and participated in a ribbon-cutting. She thanked Director of Housing and Community Development Grace Ruiz-Stepter and the Department for their efforts and expanding housing opportunities throughout Anaheim for all socio-economic backgrounds. Council Member Rubalcava recognized Loara Elementary School fifth-grade teacher Mrs. Saldivar for being recognized as an Orange County Teacher of the Year finalist. She noted that she oversees the dual-immersion program for the fifth-grade class, adding that the dual-immersion program in Anaheim is award-winning. Council Member Rubalcava reported a massive enforcement effort on April 23rd by the Anaheim Police Department Gang Enforcement Unit, in collaboration with the Orange County Violent Gang Task Force and other federal, state, and local agencies. She shared that two warrants were served on District 3 households. She thanked Chief Cid, Gang Enforcement Team, and law enforcement partners for continuing to ensure that the City’s streets are safe. Council Member Rubalcava shared that she would be collaborating with the Anaheim High School Alumni Association to provide $5,000 scholarships to students who have attended Anaheim High School, reside in District 3, or recent graduates. She reported that the deadline to submit is May 15th and recipients would be announced the following week at Anaheim High School. Council Member Rubalcava requested to adjourn the meeting in memory of Richard “Dick” LaRochelle, Anaheim High School graduate, former City of Anaheim employee, and father of recently retired Police Department Lieutenant LaRochelle. She shared that he was a dedicated public servant of 30 years, serving in Public Works, Forensics, and Code Enforcement. She added that he worked tirelessly to keep Anaheim beautiful through graffiti abatement, alley cleanups, and community efforts with Anaheim Beautiful and the Kiwanis Club. She shared that he served the county with two tours in Vietnam aboard the USS Virgo and as a reserve policeman for the Placentia and Brea Police Departments.

She highlighted his work ethic, patriotism, and commitment to others.

Council Member Balius announced the District 1 Open House meeting on June 3rd would be held at the Haskett Library from 5 p.m. to 7 p.m.

Mayor Aitken thanked the McDonald family, owners and operators of the McDonald’s restaurant located across from Disneyland Park, for inviting her to tour the restaurant. She shared that they hire local high school students part-time. She added that the General Manager began working at the restaurant decades prior, and highlighted the staff who love the family and the job. Mayor Aitken shared her attendance at the ribbon-cutting for the Azure Housing Facility, located at the former Motel Six. She highlighted the Housing and Community Development Department for expanding housing opportunities in the City. Mayor Aitken announced she would be adjourning the meeting in memory of Mary Hirahara, a lifelong community volunteer who dedicated her time to enriching the lives of people in Anaheim and Orange County. She shared that Mary worked to preserve Japanese American history, including the impact of Japanese internment during World War II, for future generations and her legacy of service and philanthropy would continue to inspire all who knew her. She expressed her condolences to her family.

City Council Minutes of May 12, 2026

CITY MANAGER’S UPDATE:

Interim City Manager Garcia shared that the Public Works Department partnered with the Anaheim Union High School District to help Anaheim students gain real-world experience. Students of varying abilities visited the City’s Public Works yard to see what sort of public service careers might be open to them in the future. The program was a meaningful way for City staff to engage with Anaheim students and teach them how to do tasks that employees do to help grow their capabilities and confidence as they plan for their futures. He thanked the Public Works team and the school district for making the program a success. Interim City Manager Garcia congratulated the Housing team for the Azure project and for working tirelessly to add new units all over Anaheim for those who need them.

He encouraged attendance at the upcoming district community meetings in June and shared that information regarding the meetings is available on the City’s website. Information regarding the budget will be provided to the community during the community meetings as well as the Budget Workshop on June 9th.

At 7:08 p.m., the City Council recessed to address the Anaheim Housing Authority agenda and reconvened at 7:09 p.m.

CONSENT CALENDAR: At 7:09 p.m., the consent calendar was considered with Council Member Maahs pulling Item No. 12 for separate consideration.

MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Leon moved to waive reading of the ordinances and resolutions and adopt the balance of the consent calendar as presented, in accordance with reports, certifications, and recommendations furnished each City Council Member, seconded by Council Member Kurtz;. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES – 7 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Leon, Balius, Rubalcava, Kurtz, Maahs, and Meeks); NOES – 0. Motion carried.

3. Approve certificates recognizing District 5 resident Nathan Enriquez for his Mater Dei Varsity Soccer accomplishments; and South Junior High School Leadership for their 2026 Civic Learning Award of Excellence.

4. Receive and file, with the possibility of discussion, the list of Professional Services Agreements authorized by the City Manager for April 2026.

5. Approve Master Agreement Contract No. 106-499121 with Sage Environmental Group LLC, in an annual amount not to exceed $228,000, for a cumulative contract amount not to exceed $1,140,000 plus a 15% contingency, for as-needed fire prevention and habitat restoration services using goats in various locations for a one year period with four one-year optional renewals; and authorize the Purchasing Agent, or designee, to execute all necessary contractual documents and exercise the renewal options, in accordance with Bid No. 9890.

6. Approve Master Agreement Contract No. 106-499037 with Siemens Industry, Inc., in the amount of $1,093,192 plus a 20% contingency, for central monitoring of fire and burglar alarms, as well as testing and inspection services for security and fire life safety systems, effective upon execution through May 31, 2029 with three one-year optional renewals for a total cumulative contract amount not to exceed $2,347,277.19 over the potential six-year period, plus a 20% contingency; and authorize the Purchasing Agent, or designee, to execute all necessary contractual documents and to exercise any renewal options, in accordance with City Council Minutes of May 12, 2026

the terms of Sourcewell Cooperative Contract 121024-SIE, which includes the option for up to three one-year additional extensions beyond the original three-year term.

7. Award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder, GRBCON, Inc., in the amount of $498,588, for the Magnolia Avenue and Broadway Sanitary Sewer Improvements Project; authorize the Director of Public Works to execute the contract and related documents and to take the necessary actions to implement and administer the contract; determine the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Class 3, Section 15303 (d) (New Construction) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; and authorize the Finance Director to execute the Escrow Agreement pertaining to contract retentions.

8. Award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder, S&H Civilworks, in the amount of $210,350, for the Street Improvements at the southwest corner of the Santa Ana Canyon Road & Royal Oak Road Intersection Project; authorize the Director of Public Works to execute the contract and related documents and to take the necessary actions to implement and administer the contract; determine that the project is categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Class 1, Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; and authorize the Finance Director to execute the Escrow Agreement pertaining to contract retentions.

9. Determine that the proposal submitted by Liftech Elevator Services, LLC is the most advantageous to the City; award a Design-Build Agreement, in substantial form, to Liftech Elevator Services, LLC, in the amount of $3,445,337.50 inclusive of a 10% contingency, to design and construct the Anaheim West Tower Elevator Modernization Project; waive any irregularities in any of the proposal documents; authorize the Director of Public Works to execute the Design-Build Agreement and related documents and to take such actions as are necessary, required, or advisable to implement and administer the Design-Build Agreement; determine that the project and any related construction activities associated therewith are exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Sections 15301(b), 15302(c), 15303(d), 15303(e), and 15304 of the California Code of Regulations; authorize de minimis changes to the Design-Build Agreement that do not substantially change the terms and conditions of the agreement, as determined by the City Attorney’s Office; and authorize the Finance Director to execute the Escrow Agreement pertaining to contract retentions in accordance with Public Contract Code Section 22300.

10. Approve Master Agreements for Arterial Street Maintenance and Construction, in substantial form, with three contractors and such other contractors pre-qualified by the City in the future during the term of the Master Agreement, each in an amount not to exceed $5,000,000 per work order package, with a limit per contractor of $10,000,000 in total awards during each fiscal year of the agreement term; each for a two year period with up to two two-year optional renewals; authorize the Public Works Director, to execute the Master Agreements and for the Public Works Director, or designee, to take the necessary actions to implement and administer the Master Agreements; determine that the projects to be performed under the Master Agreements shall be categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Sections 15301 and 15302 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; and authorize de minimis changes that do not substantially change the terms and conditions of the Master Agreement, as determined by the City Attorney’s Office [Hardy & Harper, Inc.; Onyx Paving Company, Inc.; and R.J. Noble Company].

City Council Minutes of May 12, 2026

11. Approve an Agreement with Cho Design Associates, Inc., in the amount of $68,088 plus a 15% contingency for a total amount not to exceed amount of $78,301.20, to provide engineering design services related to the Anaheim West Tower Window Project; and authorize the Director of Public Works, or designee, to execute the agreement and related documents, and to take the necessary actions to implement and administer the agreement.

13. Approve Amendment No. 1 to Agreement with KPMG, LLP to perform the annual financial audit of the City for the fiscal years ending June 30, 2026, 2027 and 2028, in amounts not to exceed $797,700, $820,000, and $850,000, respectively, with two one-year optional renewals in amounts not to exceed $875,000 and $900,000, respectively, for a cumulative amendment amount of $4,242,700, authorize the Finance Director/City Treasurer to execute the amendment and authorize de minimis changes that do not substantially change the terms and conditions of the agreement, so long as such changes are determined to be de minimis by the City Attorney’s Office.

14. Approve an agreement with Qlogic LLC, in an amount not to exceed $174,750 plus a 10% contingency for as-needed services, to develop and maintain an energy and water educational website for a term of five years; authorize the Public Utilities General Manager, or designees, to execute the agreement and related documents, including any cost-neutral amendments, assignments, and any documents contemplated by the agreement, and to take the necessary actions to implement, fund, and administer the agreement.

15. Approve an agreement with Prehospital Med LLC, in an amount not to exceed $265,000, to provide Medical Director services to Anaheim Fire & Rescue, for a three year term with two one-year optional terms; and authorize the City Manager, or designees, to execute the agreement and any related documents, including any cost-neutral amendments and any documents contemplated by the agreement, and to take such necessary or advisable actions to implement, fund, and administer the agreement.

16. RESOLUTION NO. 2026-042 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM authorizing the Director of Public Works or designee to submit an application to the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) for funds for the Environmental Cleanup, Tier 1 Grant Program under Orange County Local Transportation Ordinance No. 3 for the Stormwater Catch Basin Installation Project Phase 7 and if awarded, authorizing the acceptance of such grant funds on behalf of the City and amending the budget for fiscal year accordingly and determine that these actions are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Guideline Section 15303 [grant funds in the amount of $598,950 with local matching funds of $149,738].

17. RESOLUTION NO. 2026-043 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ratifying and approving the actions of the Anaheim Director of Housing and Community Development, or designee, in submitting a grant application on behalf of the City of Anaheim to California Volunteers for the Youth Service Corps Initiative, and accepting such grant funds on behalf of the City of Anaheim and determining that these actions are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Guideline Sections 15061(b)(3) and 15306.

City Council Minutes of May 12, 2026

Increase the budget accordingly in the Housing and Community Development’s Workforce Development Grants Fund by the awarded amount of $1,601,173.

18. RESOLUTION NO. 2026-044 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM initiating proceedings for the annual levy of assessments in, and accepting an Assessment Engineer’s Report for the Anaheim Resort Maintenance District [Fiscal Year 2026-27].

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-045 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM declaring its intention to provide for an annual levy and collection of assessments in the Anaheim Resort Maintenance District, and setting a time and place for public hearing thereon [Fiscal Year 2026-27; Public Hearing scheduled for Council meeting of June 23, 2026].

19. ORDINANCE NO. 6626 (INTRODUCTION) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM amending Chapter 10.18 (Water Conservation and Water shortage Contingency Rules and Regulations) of the Anaheim Municipal Code to update water shortage response processes and water conservation requirements, and determining that such action is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to California Water Code Section 10652 [includes determination that the Ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2)-(3) and 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines (Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3 of the California Code of Regulations) as the Ordinance does not constitute a “project” within the meaning of CEQA Guidelines section 15378 and will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment].

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-046 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM adopting the 2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan and determining that such action is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to California Water Code Section 10652.

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-047 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM adopting the 2025 Urban Water Management Plan and determining that such action is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to California Water Code Section 10652.

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-048 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM rescinding Resolution No. 2023-065, which ordered the implementation of Water Reduction Plan I; declaring a shortage category of conservation awareness; and determining that such actions are not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to California Water Code Section 10652.

20. Approve minutes of the City Council meeting of February 24, 2026.

City Council Minutes of May 12, 2026

BUSINESS CALENDAR:

12. Approve Cooperative Agreement No. 12-0876, in substantial form, with Caltrans for design (plans, specifications, and estimates) services for the Northbound SR-57 Off-Ramp to Katella Avenue and the Southbound SR-57 Off-Ramp to Ball Road as part of the proposed ocV!BE development project; approve Cooperative Agreement No. 12-0877, in substantial form, with Caltrans, in the amount of $225,000, for right-of-way services for the Northbound SR-57 Off- Ramp to Katella Avenue and the Southbound SR-57 Off-Ramp to Ball Road as part of the proposed ocV!BE development project; authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute the agreements and to take the necessary actions to implement and administer the agreements, including any extensions; and authorize de minimis changes that do not substantially change the terms and conditions of the agreements, as determined by the City Attorney’s Office [costs reimbursed by ocV!BE developer, Anaheim Real Estate Partners, LLC from a Public Works Developer Trust Account].

DISCUSSION: Council Member Maahs requested additional information on the timeline for the project and the reimbursement process.

Director of Public Works Rudy Emami reported that the timeline of the project was already underway and construction will begin once right-of-way acquisition is complete. He explained that the full $225,000 reimbursement amount had already been deposited by the ocV!BE developer into a trust account, and upon execution of the agreement, those funds would be transferred to the State to cover the agreement costs.

In response to Council Member Maahs, Director Emami stated that the overall ocV!BE project had begun. He noted that the freeway ramp improvements remain in the design and Caltrans permitting phases. He explained that the City’s goal is to complete the improvements before the Olympics and partner with OCTA on its widening project on the 57 freeway between Orangewood Avenue and Katella Avenue.

Council Member Maahs highlighted the project and expressed her support for the item.

MOTION: Council Member Maahs moved to approve Cooperative Agreement No. 12-0876, in substantial form, with Caltrans for design (plans, specifications, and estimates) services for the Northbound SR-57 Off-Ramp to Katella Avenue and the Southbound SR-57 Off-Ramp to Ball Road as part of the proposed ocV!BE development project; approve Cooperative Agreement No. 12-0877, in substantial form, with Caltrans, in the amount of $225,000, for right-of-way services for the Northbound SR-57 Off-Ramp to Katella Avenue and the Southbound SR-57 Off-Ramp to Ball Road as part of the proposed ocV!BE development project; authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute the agreements and to take the necessary actions to implement and administer the agreements, including any extensions; and authorize de minimis changes that do not substantially change the terms and conditions of the agreements, as determined by the City Attorney’s Office [costs reimbursed by ocV!BE developer, Anaheim Real Estate Partners, LLC from a Public Works Developer Trust Account], seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Leon. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES – 7 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Leon, Balius, Rubalcava, Kurtz, Maahs, and Meeks); NOES – 0. Motion carried.

City Council Minutes of May 12, 2026

21. Select an executive search firm to conduct the recruitment for the position of the City Manager and approve and authorize the Human Resources Director to negotiate and enter into an agreement with the selected firm, and any related amendments, in a total amount not to exceed $75,000, for costs associated with the contract and any contingencies that may arise from the recruitment.

Director of Human Resources Linda Andal reported that at the February 24th Council meeting, staff was directed to conduct a Request for Information (RFI) process to solicit proposals from qualified executive recruitment firms to assist with the nationwide search following the vacancy that occurred on February 4, 2026. She stated that in response to that direction, the Human Resources Department contacted ten (10) executive firms with experience in public sector executive recruitments and invited them to submit proposals. She explained that the RFI emphasized several important qualifications, including demonstrated success recruiting city managers or other municipal executive positions, strong recruitment methodologies, the ability to effectively engage with election officials and stakeholders, and a commitment to maintaining confidentiality throughout the process. She reported that as a result of the solicitation, the City received six (6) proposals. She stated that two (2) of the firms declined to participate due to scheduling conflicts and two (2) firms did not respond.

Director Andal reported that a review panel consisting of five (5) members of the executive leadership team independently evaluated the proposals based on several criteria, including qualifications and experience, recruitment strategy, stakeholder engagement, communication and transparency and overall ability to meet the City’s needs and Council’s needs. She stated that following the evaluation process, CPS, HR received the highest overall ranking, followed by Bob Murray & Associates. She shared that copies of all proposals were forwarded to the City Council for early review and evaluation, but were not included in the agenda packet. She noted that since a selection had not been made, the City Council may select any one of the six (6) firms, regardless of ranking. She reported that upon selection of a firm, the Human Resources Director would negotiate and execute an agreement with the selected firm. She stated that the selected firm will work collaboratively with the Council to develop a recruitment profile, establish a recruitment timeline and conduct a comprehensive nationwide recruitment process. She reported that the scope of work would include, but was not limited to, stakeholder outreach and engagement, candidate recruitment and evaluation, presentation of qualified candidates for Council consideration and interviews, consistent reporting throughout the process to all members of the Council, and background investigations. She shared that the scope of work was consistent with the direction provided by Council. She added that the selected firm would also provide periodic updates to the City Council throughout the recruitment process to ensure transparency and ongoing communication. She stated that the City Council may select any of the six (6) responsive firms regardless of their rankings. She added that staff’s evaluation was conducted to support an efficient and thorough process.

Pursuant to Government Code Section 1091.5, Director of Human Resources Linda Andal reported she is one of seven Agency members of the board of directors of CPS, a joint powers authority, which under California law is deemed a public entity. Anaheim has been a Member Agency of the JPA since May 2003 and she serves solely as the City’s representative. She stated she does not receive any compensation for this role, other than reimbursement for required travel expenses, as permitted by law and CPS Bylaws. The board has no authority, involvement or role related to procurement or award of public contracts for the JPA.

DISCUSSION: Mayor Aitken requested additional information regarding the timeline for entering into a contract, if the item is approved.

Director Andal presented a tentative timeline for the city manager recruitment process, noting that the current agenda item is for the City Council to select an executive recruitment firm. She explained that City Council Minutes of May 12, 2026

at the Council’s direction, staff did not present a recommendation, instead presenting all six proposals for Council's consideration. She added that the proposed timeline includes developing a recruitment brochure, conducting stakeholder and community meetings, screening candidates, and holding City Council interviews between June and September, with flexibility to adjust the schedule based on Council direction and discussions with the selected recruiter. She noted that an appointment for a City Manager could occur between September and October.

Council Member Meeks inquired if the City has utilized CPS for executive recruitments.

Director Andal reported that the firm was previously used in 2021 for the Safety Manager recruitment, the 2020 Deputy Planning Director recruitment, and previously for the City Manager recruitment.

Council Member Meeks expressed a preference for Bob Murray & Associates over CPS HR Consulting and asked whether the proposals included interviews.

Director Andal clarified that the rankings were based solely on the written proposals and did not include the interview process.

In response to Council Member Meeks, Director Andal confirmed that she has worked with both and expressed confidence in both firms.

Council Member Meeks stated support for either firm, but expressed a preference for Bob Murray & Associates.

Council Member Balius stated that Ralph Andersen & Associates, CPS HR Consulting, and Bob Murray & Associates were all highly qualified firms. He emphasized the importance of considering cost and asked whether the City’s solicitation specified the expected number of community meetings, noting that some proposals included those services in a flat fee while others identified them as additional costs.

Director Andal explained that the RFI did not specify the level of detail regarding stakeholder and community meetings. She reported that proposals included varying optional and supplemental costs, with some firms identifying virtual meetings as included and in-person meetings as additional expenses. She noted that the details could be addressed during contract negotiations and recommended authorizing an amount up to $75,000 to accommodate additional costs to meet Council’s desires for community and stakeholder meetings.

In response to Council Member Balius, Director Andal responded that preparation of the brochure is included in the recruitment fee and would be completed by the recruiter based on interviews with each Council Member to develop the City Manager candidate profile.

Council Member Balius stated that his preference would be Bob Murray & Associates, followed by CPS HR Consulting and Ralph Andersen & Associates.

In response to Mayor Pro Tem Leon, Director Andal explained that interviews with City Council members would be conducted in person. She stated that the format of stakeholder and community meetings would depend on Council's direction and the selected recruiter's approach, noting that several firms indicated virtual meetings would generally be sufficient. She added that if Council preferred in-person stakeholder meetings, that could be incorporated into the consultant’s contract.

Mayor Pro Tem Leon requested clarification on the specific direction being sought from Council.

City Council Minutes of May 12, 2026

Director Andal clarified that the requested Council action was to select one of the six executive recruitment firms and authorize staff to negotiate and execute a contract with the selected firm for an amount not to exceed $75,000.

In response to Mayor Pro Tem Leon, Director Andal confirmed that Council’s approval would authorize staff to negotiate and execute the contract without returning to Council for further approval.

Mayor Pro Tem Leon inquired whether Council would have the ability to discontinue to the recruitment process if the Council decided not to proceed.

Director Andal confirmed that the City Manager recruitment process is conducted at the City Council’s discretion. She noted that Council may discontinue the recruitment at any point, reopen the recruitment, or select a candidate outside of the recruiter’s recommended finalists.

In response to Mayor Pro Tem Leon, Director Andal stated that the proposal items would need to be reviewed for any applicable cancellation provisions and noted that such terms could also be addressed during contract negotiations.

Council Member Rubalcava expressed support for Bob Murray & Associates, citing the firm's experience recruiting city managers, while noting that its proposed fee appeared unusually low compared to similar executive search firms. She inquired how stakeholder meetings would be coordinated given that all seven Council Members would be involved in directing the recruitment process and emphasized the importance of engaging internal stakeholders.

Director Andal stated that the selected executive recruiter is experienced in working with governing bodies and would collaborate with all seven Council Members collectively and equitably throughout the recruitment process, as outlined in the City's RFI.

In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Director Andal noted that the firm has been in business for approximately 35 years and has been retained by the City on multiple occasions.

Council Member Rubalcava requested additional information on the recruitments Bob Murray & Associates have assisted with.

Director Andal reported that the City retained the firm for the 2023 Police Chief and Deputy Police Chief recruitments, as well as the 2025 Deputy Planning Director and Community Preservation and Licensing Manager recruitments.

Council Member Rubalcava requested additional information about CPS HR Consulting, including information about the firm’s experience and involvement in executive recruitments.

Director Andal explained that the request for proposals required firms to highlight only city manager or executive-level recruitment experience. She noted that CPS HR Consulting has been in business for approximately 40 years and has conducted executive recruitments for more than 20 years. She reported that as a Joint Powers Authority (JPA), CPS was established to support public sector organizations and provides a broad range of governmental and human resources services in addition to executive recruitment. She stated that the firm employs experienced recruiters and has extensive expertise in public sector operations and staffing.

Council Member Rubalcava expressed a preference for CPS HR Consulting as the top choice, citing the firm’s examples of community outreach.

City Council Minutes of May 12, 2026

Council Member Kurtz thanked staff for maintaining consistent communication with the entire City Council throughout the recruitment process and stated that the updates had increased confidence in the process. She expressed support for CPS HR Consulting, citing the firm’s broad experience.

Council Member Maahs expressed support for CPS HR Consulting as the preferred firm, citing its experience serving agencies such as Orange County, the City of Phoenix, and San Diego County.

She stated that Bob Murray & Associates was the second choice.

Council Member Balius noted that the recruitment proposals did not appear to include cancellation provisions but assumed firms would bill for services performed if the process were to discontinue. He shared that many firms offered a one-year replacement guarantee, with some proposing to conduct a replacement search at no additional professional fee if the selected candidate departed within the guaranteed period.

Mayor Aitken expressed confidence in the executive evaluation panel.

MOTION: Mayor Aitken moved to approve and authorize the Human Resources Director to negotiate and enter into an agreement with CPS HR, and any related amendments, in a total amount not to exceed $75,000, for costs associated with the contract and any contingencies that may arise from the recruitment, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Leon. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES – 7 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Leon, Balius, Rubalcava, Kurtz, Maahs, and Meeks); NOES – 0. Motion carried.

22. Review the draft Anaheim Economic Development Strategic Plan for 2026-2031 and provide staff with direction as necessary.

Director of Economic Development Sergio Ramirez introduced the Economic Development Strategic Plan, noting that it implemented Goal F of the City’s Strategic Plan, which focused on promoting economic development and tourism through business attraction, retention, job creation, and a strong, diverse local economy. He reported that the City engaged Baker Tilly to partner with the Economic Development Department in developing the plan. He stated that over the past 12 months, Baker Tilly evaluated City operations, procedures, funding, and service capacity, while conducting extensive outreach with businesses, developers, property owners, residents, City departments, and the City Council. He introduced the project team and Al Zelinka with Baker Tilly. He highlighted Mr. Zelinka’s experience in city management, community development, and economic development. He shared that Mr. Zelinka served as City Manager for the cities of Riverside and Huntington Beach. He added that prior to that, he served as the Community Development Director for the City of Huntington Beach.

Mr. Zelinka presented the proposed five-year Economic Development Strategic Plan, describing it as an implementation-focused roadmap designed to advance the City Council's priorities and address Anaheim's economic development needs across its commercial corridors and districts. He noted that the plan fulfills the Council's 2024 direction to address neighborhood and commercial blight and to create and implement a strategic economic development plan, translating those policy priorities into actionable initiatives for City staff.

Mr. Zelinka summarized the extensive outreach effort conducted to develop the Economic Development Strategic Plan, including interviews with City Council Members and department heads, community meetings, stakeholder roundtables, and public surveys. He reported that outreach included participation from more than 175 business and real estate professionals through surveys, over 352 residents at six district meetings, and more than 75 participants in roundtable discussions with small and large businesses, developers, and brokers. He noted that the feedback gathered through the engagement efforts formed the foundation of the Strategic Plan.

City Council Minutes of May 12, 2026

Mr. Zelinka explained that the Economic Development Strategic Plan is grounded in both extensive stakeholder input and economic data, including analyses prepared by the City's economic consultant, Keyser Marston. He reported that the plan follows the same framework as the City’s Strategic Plan by establishing goals, strategies, and implementation actions. He added that unlike the City’s Strategic Plan, the implementation actions are organized by year from 2027 through 2031 and identify lead and supporting departments to enhance accountability and track progress. He stated that the overview would focus on the plan’s goals and strategies.

Mr. Zelinka outlined Goal A of the Plan, which focused on attracting and retaining business through primary strategies: promoting Anaheim locally, regionally, nationally, and internationally; attracting industries that strengthen the City's tax base; and proactively supporting existing businesses to retain jobs and encourage expansion. He emphasized that business attraction and retention are essential to maintaining a strong local economy, generating General Fund revenues, and supporting quality employment opportunities throughout Anaheim.

Mr. Zelinka reported that Goal B of the Plan focused on promoting tourism, hospitality, sports, and entertainment through strategies to expand lodging, dining, and entertainment opportunities and position the Angel Stadium property for long-term success. He noted that tourism remains a key economic driver for Anaheim and emphasized preparing for future growth while balancing citywide economic benefits with neighborhood stability. He identified the City Manager’s Office as the lead department for efforts related to the Angel Stadium property, with support from the Economic Development Department and other City departments.

Mr. Zelinka outlined Goal C of the Plan. He explained that the goal focused on supporting small businesses through strategies to strengthen local retail and restaurant businesses, provide information on financing opportunities, leverage City partnerships to increase business visibility, and improve navigation of City processes and regulations for small and micro businesses. He noted that feedback from the business community emphasized the importance of access to capital, marketing support, and assistance with regulatory processes. He stated that the goal is intended to create a more seamless business experience and strengthen commercial corridors and districts throughout Anaheim.

Mr. Zelinka stated that Goal D focused on revitalizing Anaheim's commercial corridors through strategies that include managing successor agency properties, advancing the 39 Commons development, packaging investment-ready sites, fostering a vibrant downtown, and revitalizing key commercial corridors. He noted that community feedback highlighted a strong desire for visible improvements, including enhanced cleanliness, safety, and reinvestment in underutilized properties, with an emphasis on delivering tangible results that benefit residents and businesses.

Mr. Zelinka outlined the final goal, Goal E, of the Plan, which focused on evaluating the Economic Development Department's organizational structure and establishing sustainable funding strategies.

He noted that the Department was created with one-time and declining successor agency funding and that stakeholder input strongly supported maintaining a dedicated Department. He reported that the Plan recommends transitioning to a more sustainable funding model to ensure the department's long-term effectiveness. He emphasized that economic development is a citywide responsibility requiring collaboration across all departments and highlighted the importance of continually improving the development review process to better serve businesses and investment opportunities.

DISCUSSION: Council Member Meeks expressed support for incorporating stronger Code Enforcement efforts into commercial corridor revitalization initiatives, emphasizing the importance of maintaining property standards to support businesses and enhance neighborhood quality throughout the City. She highlighted the City’s ongoing permit streamlining efforts and encouraged continued City Council Minutes of May 12, 2026

interdepartmental collaboration to improve the business development process. She expressed concerns about Anaheim’s lower-than-average high school graduation rates and suggested exploring educational support programs, such as GED classes through the City’s libraries, to strengthen workforce development. She noted that improving educational opportunities could benefit both residents and the City's long-term economic development efforts.

Mayor Pro Tem Leon thanked staff for the Economic Development Strategic Plan and asked how progress on Goal D, continued revitalization of commercial corridors, would be measured. He noted that many of the implementation actions are ongoing and requested information on key performance indicators (KPIs) or other measurable objectives that would be evaluated.

Director Ramirez reported that Goal D encompasses a broad range of initiatives and that specific KPI’s are being developed for individual commercial districts and corridors. He noted that planned performance measures include attracting targeted industries through economic analyses, advancing business growth initiatives, evaluating business improvement districts, implementing corridor revitalization projects, supporting small business development, reducing code enforcement and public safety issues, and promoting placemaking and reinvestment efforts in commercial areas, including the Canyon, Little Arabia, Beach Boulevard, and Center City.

Mayor Pro Tem Leon requested clarification on how ongoing implementation actions would be managed, asking whether specific timelines, milestones, and deadlines would be established for initiatives such as developing industry-specific marketing materials and investment packages. He emphasized the importance of having a clear implementation roadmap to measure progress toward the plan's long-term economic development goals.

Director Ramirez explained that one of the plan's implementation priorities is developing a strategic marketing and communications plan to better promote Anaheim's strengths. He noted that the City's public utility system is a significant competitive advantage and emphasized the importance of working collaboratively with City departments to identify and market the incentives and assets that distinguish Anaheim and attract targeted industries and businesses.

In response to Mayor Pro Tem Leon, Director Ramirez emphasized that developing a strategic marketing and communications plan is one of the City's highest implementation priorities for the coming year.

Mayor Pro Tem Leon requested that the Economic Development Strategic Plan explicitly include exploring and pursuing the formation of a Business Improvement District (BID) in the Little Arabia District. He noted growing interest among local business owners and brokers and emphasized the importance of providing outreach, education, and City support throughout the BID formation process.

Director Ramirez confirmed that the Business Improvement District initiative is already included under Goal D, but stated that, based on Council direction, it could be identified as a standalone implementation action and scheduled as a 2027 priority.

In response to Mayor Pro Tem Leon, Deputy City Manager Ted White clarified that Goal D, Action D already includes support for the revitalization of key commercial corridors, including Little Arabia, and specifically provides for City support of locally initiated BID formations, concluding that the requested initiative is already addressed within the plan.

Council Member Kurtz expressed support for the Plan's emphasis on diversifying Anaheim's economy while continuing to strengthen the City's tourism, hospitality, sports, and entertainment sectors. She also emphasized the importance of collaboration among City departments and recognized the value City Council Minutes of May 12, 2026

of leveraging market and visitor data from the Convention Center and tourism staff to inform economic development strategies and attract visitors and investment. She highlighted the importance of public safety as a foundational element of the City's economic development efforts, noting that maintaining a safe community is essential for attracting businesses, supporting tourism, revitalizing commercial corridors, and encouraging investment. She requested that the Plan more explicitly recognize the critical role of the Police and Fire Departments in achieving the City's economic development objectives.

Council Member Rubalcava thanked staff for developing the Economic Development Strategic Plan and expressed strong support for its focus on business attraction and retention. She shared strong support for Goal A, emphasizing that attracting and retaining businesses is the foundation of economic development. She encouraged the City to pursue high-value employers and industries that generate significant sales tax revenue and quality jobs, citing the future Porsche dealership as an example of the type of investment the City should seek. She recognized the importance of restaurants and hospitality businesses, but noted that restaurants generally produce less tax revenue and experience high business failure rates, making economic diversification an important priority. She highlighted Goal B and agreed with the emphasis on tourism, hospitality, sports, and entertainment while recognizing the important role of Visit Anaheim in those efforts. She encouraged the City to continue developing partnerships with international organizations and foreign trade representatives, referencing recent engagement with Mexican officials to promote technology-related investment. She recommended leveraging the City's memberships in professional and industry associations, as well as collaborating with organizations such as the Orange County Business Council, to identify businesses seeking new headquarters or expansion opportunities in Anaheim. She supported revitalization of commercial corridors but cautioned against placing too much emphasis on physical improvements and signage without ensuring that new businesses and employers are actually locating within those areas. She stated that while corridor branding is valuable, the City's primary objective should be attracting industries such as aerospace and other high-quality employers that create jobs and expand the local economy. She acknowledged the challenges associated with utilizing federal Opportunity Zone incentives and suggested partnering with experienced consultants to better assist businesses in navigating those programs and attracting private investment. She shared that under Goal E, she had concerns regarding expansion of the Economic Development Department and its funding. She recognized the importance of economic development; however, emphasized the need to avoid creating overlapping responsibilities with departments such as Planning, which already plays a critical role in facilitating business development and permitting. She cautioned against organizational changes that could complicate interdepartmental coordination. She requested additional information regarding the Economic Development Department’s current budget.

Community Investment Manager Ajay Kolluri explained that the Economic Development Department's budget is funded through two primary sources: a General Fund transfer based on a formula tied to former redevelopment agency revenues, and one-time revenues generated from the sale of former successor agency properties. He noted that because property sale proceeds are finite and decline as assets are sold, a significant portion of the department's operating budget relies on an unsustainable, one-time funding source. He stated that the Strategic Plan identifies this funding challenge but does not propose a specific solution. He explained that the plan is intended to acknowledge the issue and initiate future discussions among the City Council, City Manager's Office, and Finance Department to develop a sustainable long-term funding strategy for the Economic Development Department.

In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Interim City Manager Greg Garcia responded that a detailed budget breakdown was not immediately available but would be provided during the upcoming June budget discussions. He noted that the budget presentation would identify the department's funding sources, including General Fund support and declining successor agency City Council Minutes of May 12, 2026

revenues. He emphasized that Goal E is intended to highlight the need to develop a sustainable long- term funding model for the Economic Development Department.

Council Member Rubalcava stated that, before considering long-term funding solutions for the Economic Development Department, the City Council should review the department's performance and measurable outcomes. She requested KPIs and other metrics demonstrating the department's accomplishments and the return on taxpayer investment, explaining that the information would help inform future funding decisions during the budget process.

Interim City Manager Garcia emphasized that developing a sustainable funding strategy is necessary to implement the Economic Development Strategic Plan and achieve its long-term goals and initiatives.

Council Member Rubalcava stated that while the Economic Development Strategic Plan contains many worthwhile initiatives, not all of the proposed actions should necessarily be the responsibility of the Economic Development Department. She emphasized the importance of maintaining a focused, results-oriented approach, particularly on business attraction and retention, and suggested that some initiatives may be more appropriately led by other departments, such as Marketing or Communications. She reiterated the need to prioritize measurable outcomes and thanked staff for the comprehensive presentation, expressing appreciation for the work completed and interest in seeing the plan implemented.

Council Member Maahs expressed appreciation for the Economic Development Strategic Plan and emphasized the importance of ensuring that small businesses receive the same level of attention as major development projects. She requested additional information on how the City engages with small businesses that do not typically participate in City outreach efforts.

Director Ramirez explained that the City engages small businesses through partnerships with community organizations, direct outreach, community meetings, social media, and targeted business roundtables. He noted that the small business roundtables held during development of the Economic Development Strategic Plan generated strong participation and valuable feedback and will continue to serve as a key outreach strategy.

Mr. Zelinka highlighted the success of the business roundtables, noting that they created valuable networking opportunities among Anaheim businesses. He noted that during one roundtable, businesses discovered they had been purchasing goods and services from outside the city despite being able to source them locally, leading to new commitments to do business with one another. He explained that the feedback directly informed Goal C, including actions to create an Anaheim business-to-business directory and establish regular quarterly business roundtables to strengthen local business connections and support the local economy.

Council Member Maahs emphasized the importance of diversifying the City's revenue base by attracting industries that are less vulnerable to economic downturns, such as biotechnology and defense, to strengthen Anaheim's long-term economic resilience.

Council Member Balius thanked staff for developing a comprehensive and well-considered Economic Development Strategic Plan and expressed support for its overall direction. He emphasized that public safety is essential to successful economic development, particularly along Beach Boulevard, stating that maintaining a safe environment is critical to attracting high-quality businesses and investment. He distinguished the role of the Economic Development Department from Visit Anaheim, noting that while Visit Anaheim promotes tourism and visitor attractions, the Economic Development Department is focused on attracting businesses that invest in Anaheim and serve the local City Council Minutes of May 12, 2026

community. He encouraged continued outreach and marketing efforts to recruit new businesses and recognized the department's work in supporting new business openings and economic growth, expressing appreciation for staff's efforts.

Mayor Aitken expressed support for the plan's inclusion of Opportunity Zone initiatives and the pursuit of additional state and federal funding for qualifying areas throughout the City. She inquired how flexible the Economic Development Strategic Plan would be in responding to changing economic conditions and unforeseen opportunities, noting that implementation should allow for adjustments as new priorities and economic circumstances arise.

Director Ramirez responded that the Economic Development Strategic Plan is intended to remain flexible to accommodate changing economic conditions, emerging opportunities, and evolving City priorities. He stated that the Plan would be reviewed annually either as part of the City's overall Strategic Plan update or through a dedicated economic development update, allowing the City Council to revise goals and implementation actions as needed.

Mayor Aitken inquired whether the City has considered implementing zoning changes to encourage redevelopment of underutilized commercial centers along major transportation corridors into mixed- use projects with housing. She noted that recent State legislation promotes housing near transit and suggested that increasing residential development along commercial corridors could help expand the customer base for local businesses.

Deputy City Manager White responded that, through the recently adopted Housing Element and its implementation program, the City has updated its Zoning code to allow by-right residential development in certain underutilized commercial areas, including older strip malls, without requiring a separate rezoning process.

In response to Mayor Aitken, Deputy City Manager White explained that the City's by-right residential zoning generally allows residential-only development rather than mixed-use projects. He noted that mixed-use development has historically faced market challenges and has been most successful in highly walkable areas and major intersections, while mid-block mixed-use projects have generally not proven economically viable over the past two decades.

Mayor Aitken inquired how the City is distributing information about the Housing Element to developers.

Deputy City Manager White stated that the City has a variety of tools available to facilitate redevelopment opportunities and noted that housing developers are highly proactive in identifying potential sites. He explained that developers actively build relationships with property owners and are well aware of redevelopment opportunities throughout Anaheim, including sites suitable for new housing.

In response to Mayor Aitken, Director Ramirez explained that individual property owners—not the Downtown Anaheim Association—are responsible for leasing and managing retail properties in the Center Street area. He added that the Downtown Anaheim Association manages public spaces and programming, while the City participates as a board member and meets regularly with the association to address operational issues. He noted that retail vacancy along Center Street is relatively limited.

Mayor Aitken inquired whether the City plans to partner with professional marketing experts to better promote Anaheim's economic advantages as part of its business attraction strategy. She emphasized the importance of effectively communicating the City's competitive strengths—such as affordable public utility rates, business-friendly environment, and successful business investments—to City Council Minutes of May 12, 2026

prospective employers. She encouraged developing a proactive marketing strategy that highlights success stories, including major business expansions and relocations, and leverages local media and City leadership to showcase Anaheim's economic assets and attract additional investment.

Director Ramirez agreed that engaging a professional marketing firm would be the department's preferred approach for developing and promoting Anaheim's economic development brand. He explained that the firm would help create a comprehensive marketing strategy highlighting Anaheim's competitive advantages, develop targeted messaging and marketing materials, and position the City to compete nationally and internationally for business investment in industries such as tourism, bioscience, and manufacturing. He added that the process would include input City leadership, business stakeholders, and departments to create customized marketing tools and narratives that effectively communicate Anaheim's strengths.

Mayor Aitken encouraged the City to make greater use of social media and local media outlets to highlight Anaheim's economic successes, including showcasing local CEOs, successful business relocations and expansions, and the City's competitive advantages. She cited Arizona Tea as an example of a significant success story that deserves greater public recognition. She inquired whether the Economic Development Department has analyzed the impact of the former hotel incentive program and requested information on new development activity in the Resort district since the incentive program expired.

Director Ramirez stated that the City has not conducted a formal evaluation of the former hotel incentive program. He noted that hotel development costs ultimately exceeded the assumptions made when the program was adopted in 2016, while the resulting economic benefits to the City appear to have surpassed original projections. He shared that a retrospective analysis would be valuable and added that, with anticipated growth from DisneylandForward and OCVIBE, demand for hotel rooms is expected to increase, creating opportunities to attract additional hotel development and retain investment within Anaheim rather than neighboring cities.

Mayor Aitken suggested exploring updates to zoning standards along Harbor Boulevard, particularly hotel density requirements, to encourage redevelopment and reduce the need for parcel-by-parcel zoning changes. She noted that upcoming infrastructure improvements, including construction of the pedestrian bridge, present an opportunity to reevaluate zoning policies in the Resort area. She expressed strong support for departmental performance dashboards to improve accountability and transparency and emphasized the importance of continued cross-department collaboration to streamline the business permitting process. She recommended establishing a "one-stop" business assistance model, with Economic Development serving as a central point of contact to guide new businesses through the City's permitting and approval process, making it easier for entrepreneurs to open and retain businesses in Anaheim.

Mayor Pro Tem Leon requested that the proposed Little Arabia Business Improvement District (BID) be identified as a standalone action within the Economic Development Department Strategic Plan rather than being included as part of a broader implementation item, stating that doing so would better emphasize the City's commitment to advancing the initiative. He stressed the importance of continued collaboration between the Economic Development and Planning Departments to ensure businesses receive coordinated assistance throughout the development and permitting process, while acknowledging recent improvements and encouraging continued efforts to streamline approvals and enhance the customer experience.

Council Member Rubalcava expressed support for targeted business-to-business marketing efforts but stated that broad marketing of tourism, hospitality, sports, and entertainment should remain outside the primary role of the Economic Development Department. She encouraged staff to focus City Council Minutes of May 12, 2026

marketing efforts on trade shows, partnerships with regional chambers of commerce, and outreach to businesses considering expansion into Anaheim. She cautioned staff to carefully evaluate any future business incentives or subsidy programs, noting that such programs have historically been controversial in Anaheim. She acknowledged that incentives can sometimes be necessary to attract investment; however, urged transparency and thoughtful consideration of any future incentive packages, particularly distinguishing between support for small businesses and larger corporations.

She emphasized the importance of interdepartmental collaboration regarding business development, noting ongoing efforts with the Planning Department to improve the development review process. She suggested continuing to streamline permitting through clear, user-friendly processes, including online resources that outline required permits, approvals, and departmental responsibilities for prospective businesses. She encouraged staff to ensure the Economic Development Department's website provides comprehensive resources for businesses evaluating Anaheim as a potential location. She requested updates on the City's efforts to recruit businesses to long-vacant commercial properties, including prominent vacant sites and existing commercial vacancies, and asked staff to provide information on current recruitment strategies and measurable success in filling those spaces.

Deputy City Manager White clarified that improvements to the planning and building review process are a key component of the Economic Development Strategic Plan and confirmed that the Planning and Building Department will serve as the lead department for those initiatives. He explained that Economic Development, along with Public Works, Utilities, Fire, and other departments, will provide supporting roles to ensure a coordinated and streamlined development review process.

Council Member Rubalcava expressed support for highlighting Anaheim's competitive advantages in future marketing materials, recommending that business recruitment efforts emphasize key features and benefits such as the City's lower utility rates, large resident population, and substantial daily increase in population due to visitors and workforce activity.

Council Member Balius asked whether the implementation actions in the Economic Development Strategic Plan should be prioritized to better identify the City's highest priorities, noting that the plan contains numerous ongoing initiatives. He suggested that establishing a prioritized order could help guide implementation and resource allocation. He emphasized the importance of pursuing long-term ground lease opportunities on City-owned land, stating that leasing available properties could provide a sustainable revenue source while supporting the City's broader economic development objectives.

He clarified whether the Economic Development Strategic Plan should establish a clearer prioritization of its goals and implementation actions, similar to the City's broader Strategic Plan, to better identify the highest-priority initiatives and guide the City's efforts. He suggested that the Plan place greater emphasis on leveraging City-owned property as an economic development tool, including opportunities to lease or otherwise utilize municipal land to generate ongoing revenue while supporting economic growth.

Director Ramirez responded that the use of City-owned and successor agency properties is already addressed under Goal D, which focuses on managing and disposing of the successor agency property portfolio. He explained that vacant properties are actively managed and, when immediate redevelopment is not possible due to environmental remediation or legal constraints, the City seeks temporary activation opportunities until long-term development can occur. He added that previous Council interest in activating underutilized properties has been incorporated into the Strategic Plan's implementation approach.

In response to Council Member Balius, Director Ramirez stated that City-owned properties are generally managed by the Public Works Department, noting that further evaluation would be needed to determine how those properties could be incorporated into the City's economic development strategy.

City Council Minutes of May 12, 2026

Council Member Balius recommended adding greater emphasis in the Economic Development Strategic Plan on leveraging City-owned properties to generate ongoing revenue, stating that municipal assets should be strategically utilized to support economic development and provide long- term income for the City.

Interim City Manager Garcia responded that the City regularly evaluates opportunities to utilize City- owned properties for revenue generation and economic development, noting that the appropriateness of such uses depends on the property's location and other site-specific considerations.

Director Ramirez acknowledged that the Strategic Plan contains numerous ongoing initiatives but explained that the intent is to maintain a focused, achievable five-year work program with measurable KPIs. He noted that the plan reflects extensive input from the City Council and community stakeholders, while balancing ongoing obligations—such as successor agency responsibilities—with the City's available staffing and resources to ensure meaningful progress on Council priorities.

Council Member Balius suggested that the Economic Development Strategic Plan prioritize its initiatives to provide clearer direction to staff, noting that while all of the ongoing efforts are valuable, identifying the highest-priority actions would help focus resources and implementation.

Deputy City Manager White explained that the Economic Development Strategic Plan already incorporates a level of prioritization by organizing actions over a five-year implementation timeline, with Year One initiatives representing the highest near-term priorities. He noted that unlike the broader City Strategic Plan, many economic development activities are ongoing and must remain flexible to respond to changing market conditions and emerging opportunities.

Council Member Balius suggested partnering with the Workforce Investment Board and local colleges to support GED and high school completion programs, noting that these organizations may be better suited than the library system to help strengthen workforce development and educational attainment.

Deputy City Manager White advised that Council could approve the Strategic Plan as presented, approve with amendments, or direct staff to return with additional revisions. He noted that proposed changes, including adding a goal for the Little Arabia Business Improvement District, could be incorporated through a Council motion or following discussions with Council Members.

MOTION: Council Member Rubalcava moved to continue the item and direct staff to incorporate the Council’s feedback into a revised Strategic Plan.

DISCUSSION: Council Member Rubalcava explained that additional detail and refinement would help Council provide more informed direction, particularly as the City enters the budget planning process.

Interim City Manager Garcia stated that the Council’s feedback could be incorporated into the Economic Development Strategic Plan and explained that the Plan could be approved with the proposed revisions. He added that additional details, including budget and organizational considerations, could continue to be developed and presented as part of future implementation efforts.

Council Member Rubalcava expressed concern about approving the Plan before the Council’s feedback was fully incorporated. She requested that staff revise the Plan to reflect the comments received, provide additional detail on implementation priorities and measurable KPIs, and return with an updated version for Council consideration rather than approving the Plan.

City Council Minutes of May 12, 2026

Council Member Meeks stated that the revised Economic Development Strategic Plan should incorporate the Council's feedback and recommended that staff work directly with individual Council Members to clarify any comments that were not sufficiently specific before finalizing the document.

She suggested the revised plan could return as a consent calendar item if appropriate, noting that the plan was close to completion. She added that the existing format appropriately reflects the need for flexibility in responding to economic opportunities.

Council Member Kurtz expressed support for the Plan’s approach, noting that economic development requires staff to manage multiple initiatives simultaneously and remain flexible in responding to emerging opportunities. She stated that the Year One actions already reflect the City's priorities and that additional ranking of initiatives is unnecessary, as priorities will naturally shift when significant development opportunities arise. She emphasized the importance of continuing progress on all ongoing efforts, while highlighting the proposed Little Arabia Business Improvement District as a particularly important initiative.

Mayor Aitken supported having staff meet individually with Council Members who provided comments to ensure their feedback was accurately reflected in the final Plan. She suggested returning the revised plan on the Consent Calendar, if appropriate, to ensure the final language captures the Council’s intent.

MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Leon moved to approve the Economic Development Strategic Plan, incorporating Council’s feedback, including adding Goal E to include the Little Arabia Business Improvement District, and return to Council with the final plan.

DISCUSSION: Council Member Rubalcava requested that the motion include direction to staff to incorporate feedback and revise the Economic Development Strategic Plan accordingly, and return the updated plan on the Consent Calendar for approval.

City Attorney Fabela advised that no motion was pending because neither Council Member's motion had received a second.

Council Member Rubalcava proposed modifying the motion to direct staff to incorporate the Council's feedback, including revisions related to the proposed Little Arabia Business Improvement District, consult with Council Members as needed to ensure their comments are accurately reflected, and return the revised Economic Development Strategic Plan on the consent calendar for approval. She noted that the approach would ensure the final document reflects the Council’s intent while avoiding the need for additional discussion.

Mayor Pro Tem Leon inquired whether delaying approval of the Economic Development Strategic Plan until the following Council meeting would present any concerns.

Interim City Manager Garcia stated that while there was no urgency to approve the Economic Development Strategic Plan. He explained that staff had hoped to obtain Council approval to provide clear direction and move forward with implementation and other priorities. He added that if Council preferred additional time to refine the plan through individual meetings, there would be no objection, and a brief delay would not significantly impact ongoing economic development efforts. He committed to meeting individually with Council Members to review their comments, incorporate the suggested revisions into the Economic Development Strategic Plan, circulate the updated document for review, and return it to the Council on the Consent Calendar, with a target timeframe of June, subject to Council availability.

City Council Minutes of May 12, 2026

In response to Mayor Aitken, Interim City Manager Garcia confirmed the action would be to continue the item.

Mayor Aitken suggested continuing the item to a date certain, for the June 9th City Council meeting, to incorporate Council feedback, ensuring accountability for completing the revisions and returning the updated plan for consideration.

Director Ramirez requested clarification from the City Attorney on whether the item could return on the Consent Calendar, or whether continuing the item would require the Plan to return on the Business Calendar.

City Attorney Fabela stated that, while a continuance would typically require the item to return as a Business Calendar item, the Council could instead direct staff to revise the Economic Development Strategic Plan and place the updated version on the Consent Calendar, with the option for any Council Member to pull it for discussion if needed.

In response to Mayor Aitken, City Attorney Fabela advised that the City Council could move to continue the item with direction to place the Plan on the Consent Calendar following input from Council Members.

MOTION: Council Member Rubalcava moved to continue the item to the June 9th City Council meeting, seconded by Council Member Balius. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES – 7 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Leon, Balius, Rubalcava, Kurtz, Maahs, and Meeks); NOES – 0. Motion carried.

23. RESOLUTION NO. 2026-049 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM opposing the California High-Speed Rail Authority’s proposal to establish Tax Increment Financing districts.

Government Affairs Manager Alyssa Guerrero reported that the item was a resolution to oppose the California High-Speed Rail Authority’s proposal to establish State-controlled Tax Increment Financing Districts. She stated that at the May 5, 2026 Council meeting, Council Member Balius requested an agenda item for the City to consider formally opposing the proposal. She reported that in February 2026, the High-Speed Rail Authority released its construction strategy and revenue approach for the High-Speed Rail Project. She added that the plan included a proposal to establish tax increment financing districts within a half-mile radius of proposed station locations.

Government Affairs Manager Guerrero stated that under the High-Speed Rail Authority’s proposal, the State would be allowed to capture property and sales tax growth revenue from new developments to support the construction of the High-Speed Rail Project. She reported that Anaheim is identified as a future High-Speed Rail Station site at the ARTIC, and if the proposal advances, it could divert property and sales tax growth revenue from the areas surrounding the station, including OCVIBE.

She explained that such revenues from OCVIBE could potentially be captured to fund the High- Speed Rail Project, thereby taking away funding that could support essential public services, including parks, housing, infrastructure, maintenance, transportation, and public safety.

Government Affairs Manager Guerrero reported that on April 27, the State Senate Transportation Committee held an informational hearing on the draft 2026 Business Plan. She explained that the Plan is likely to move forward through the State budget process, and the City would not receive specific information about the proposal until it appears in a budget trailer bill. She stated that Statewide local government organizations, including the League of California Cities, the California Association of Counties, and the California Special Districts Association, have led efforts to oppose City Council Minutes of May 12, 2026

the proposal. She explained that if approved, the resolution and a letter of opposition would be sent to State legislators.

DISCUSSION: Council Member Balius clarified that the discussion was not opposition to the High- Speed Rail Project itself; however, opposition to the proposed formation of taxing districts included in the legislation. He expressed concern that the proposal’s language was overly broad and could allow tax increment financing outside the normal State budget process, potentially creating a precedent for future taxing districts. He noted that Anaheim has made significant local investments, including around Angel Stadium, to generate revenue for City services and expressed concern that State capture of local property or sales tax revenues could negatively affect the City’s finances. He recommended that the City formally oppose the proposed language to enable staff to actively advocate against the measure.

Council Member Meeks expressed support for opposing the proposed taxing district language, noting that the City invested in ARTIC and surrounding development in anticipation of the economic benefits associated with future high-speed rail service. She stated that Anaheim has prepared for the High- Speed Rail and should retain the local economic benefits generated by those investments rather than lose them through State tax increment proposals.

Council Member Kurtz expressed concern that the proposal was being advanced through the State budget process rather than the traditional legislative process. She recommended sending the City’s opposition to Anaheim’s legislative representatives, directing the City’s lobbyists to actively oppose the proposal, and having staff communicate directly with legislators to convey the City’s concerns.

In response to Mayor Pro Tem Leon, Government Affairs Manager Guerrero confirmed that the resolution would be revised accordingly to update “letters of support” to “letters of opposition”.

Mayor Pro Tem Leon requested clarification in the resolution that Anaheim supports public transportation and future high-speed rail service, while opposing only the proposed taxing district language. He stated that the City supports expanding public transportation through a fair, transparent, and collaborative partnership with the state, and recommended including that message in communications with state legislators to avoid any misunderstanding about the City's position.

Mayor Aitken requested that the resolution be revised to explicitly state the City’s support for the High-Speed Rail Project and not that ARTIC was developed in anticipation of serving as a future High-Speed Rail station, ensuring the City’s opposition is clearly limited to the proposed taxing district provisions.

Council Member Balius agreed to incorporate language affirming the City’s support for the High- Speed Rail, emphasizing that the intent of the item was not to oppose the project itself but to oppose the proposed tax increment financing provisions.

Council Member Rubalcava supported incorporating language affirming the City’s support for public transportation and recognizing Anaheim’s investment in infrastructure to accommodate the future High-Speed Rail Project. She emphasized that the City’s opposition is directed solely at the proposed tax increment financing provisions, particularly given the importance of public transportation in a tourism-oriented community.

MOTION: Council Member Balius moved to approve RESOLUTION NO. 2026-049 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM opposing the California High- Speed Rail Authority’s proposal to establish Tax Increment Financing districts, as amended to update the recital to state “letters of opposition” and include a recital expressing the City’s support of the City Council Minutes of May 12, 2026

High-Speed Rail project, seconded by Council Member Meeks. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES – 7 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Leon, Balius, Rubalcava, Kurtz, Maahs, and Meeks); NOES – 0. Motion carried.

24. Receive presentation on Senate Bill (SB) 707 (2025) regarding changes to the Ralph M.

Brown Act (Brown Act).

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-050 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM establishing Council Policy No. 1.14 regarding the City’s policy in response to telephonic or internet service disruption during public meeting. (Council Policy No.

1.14 amended to clarify disruption to “City” services)
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-051 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM establishing Council Policy No. 1.15 establishing a public posting board for publicly translated agendas. (Council Policy No. 1.15 amended Section C. to read removal of agendas on the day following the Council meeting)
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-052 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM determining reasonable efforts to encourage public participation in meetings pursuant to Government Code § 54953.4.

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-053 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM amending and restating the procedures and rules of order for the conduct of City Council meetings.

Provide additional direction or feedback to staff regarding meeting procedures, as desired.

City Clerk Theresa Bass reported that in October 2025, Senate Bill (SB) 707 was signed into law, enacting the most comprehensive set of amendments to the Brown Act. She stated that the legislation restructured and expanded the statutory framework governing public access and remote participation in local government meetings with the intent to diversify and increase public engagement. She explained that the new requirements under SB 707 apply to “Eligible legislative bodies”, defined as City Councils with populations of greater than 30,000 or City Councils in counties with populations of greater than 600,000. She confirmed that the City of Anaheim meets the criteria and was thereby subject to those requirements outlined in the statute. She reported that among the various new requirements under SB 707, the legislation requires eligible legislative bodies to provide two-way telephonic or audiovisual access for all open meetings and to take specific actions that encourage residents to participate, including comprehensive language access for non-English speakers.

City Clerk Bass explained that SB 707 requires City Council meetings to move beyond live streaming and offer hybrid meetings. She noted that currently, the public can watch City Council meetings online through Granicus, YouTube, and on Anaheim TV. She reported that starting July 1, the public must be able to participate through a two-way phone or video platform, with the ability to provide real- time public comment. She explained that to meet those requirements, staff is working with the City’s Information Services Team to utilize Zoom Webinar, which integrates with the City’s current systems and provides automatic captioning. She added that with the shift to remote participation, members of the public would be provided information and clear instructions on the City’s procedures to participate City Council Minutes of May 12, 2026

and provide public comments remotely. She explained that similar to in-person speakers, those who would like to provide public comments would be asked to complete a speaker form, which would be provided online, to indicate if they are addressing City Council on an agenda item or any non-agenda item, but within the Council’s jurisdiction. She reported that following the completion of in-person speakers, staff would call upon those who submitted an online form to address Council remotely. She noted that the public comment procedures remain unchanged, with speakers having one opportunity to address the City Council, except for scheduled public hearings. She added that the public comment period is limited to 90 minutes or until all agenda item speakers have been heard; beyond the 90 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and City Council, the non-agenda related speakers may be heard during the second public period, held at the end of Council business. She reported that with the new technical component to City Council meetings, SB 707 requires the City Council to approve a policy regarding disruption of the remote platform and efforts to restore service. She explained that if a disruption prevents the public from attending a meeting, the City Council must take a recess and try to restore service for at least one hour, or until service is restored, whichever occurs first. She added that if the disruption cannot be resolved, the City Council must adopt a finding by roll call vote confirming that good-faith efforts were made to fix the issue and that resuming the meeting serves the public interest more than delaying it further. She explained that the proposed Council Policy No. 1.14 ensures compliance with SB 707.

City Clerk Bass reported that SB 707 also revises and restates the existing teleconferencing provisions for states of emergency, just cause, and emergency circumstances, and expands coverage to include: (1) states of emergency declared by localities, and (2) just cause allowances, including physical or family medical emergencies preventing in-person attendance and military service. She noted that in addition, SB 707 allows agencies to permit attendance by a Council Member via teleconferencing as a reasonable accommodation under applicable law, including the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). She added that those attending in accordance with this section must disclose any present adults and their relationship to them and participate via audio and camera, unless their disability prevents them from doing so. She reported that the new law also authorizes remote teleconference meetings by “eligible subsidiary bodies” of local agencies, as long as the subsidiary bodies comply with certain requirements. She explained that compliance is defined as having at least one physical location for the meeting, requiring that members attending remotely appear on camera and requiring the legislative body that created the subsidiary body to make certain findings prior to authorizing fully remote meetings and at least every six months thereafter. She added that under SB 707, an “eligible subsidiary body” includes only advisory bodies that cannot take certain final actions and do not have primary subject matter jurisdiction on elections, budgets, police oversight, privacy, library material restrictions, or taxing or spending proposals.

City Clerk Bass reported that in efforts to increase participation from underrepresented groups and non-English speakers, agendas must be translated into every applicable language when the agenda is posted within the required 72-hour notice. She explained that the bill defines “applicable languages” as those spoken by at least 20 percent (20%) of the local population that speaks English less than “very well,” according to the most recent American Community Survey. She stated that based on current demographic information from the American Community Survey, Spanish is the only applicable language for the City, with Spanish spoken by 41% of Anaheim residents and 39% speak English “less than very well.” She reported that pursuant to the new legislation, the City Council Agenda will be translated into Spanish and posted concurrently with the English version under the Brown Act’s agenda-posting deadlines. She added that translation of the agenda would also include instructions for how to join the meeting via telephonic or internet-based service, including the speaker instructions for public comment. She stated that SB 707 requires a freely accessible physical location near the official posted agenda to be made available for members of the public to post additional translations of the agenda. She added that the Public Posting Board is for publicly translated agendas only and any documents other than translated agendas for the Anaheim City Council are not City Council Minutes of May 12, 2026

permitted. She explained that the Brown Act does not provide for City review of agenda translations posted by third parties. She noted that to ensure that members of the public who may rely on such translations, the Posting Board will include language stating that the City is not responsible for the content or accuracy of the content, of the posted agendas on the Posting Board. She reported that proposed Council Policy No. 1.15 ensures compliance and establishes the procedures for the translated agendas by the public pursuant to SB 707. She added that staff is requesting an amendment to the policy to read as follows: “To ensure that the Public Posting Board does not contain outdated information, staff will remove agendas the day after the meeting date”, from Wednesday, to account for meetings that may not fall on a Tuesday.

City Clerk Theresa Bass reported that the intent of SB 707 was to increase and encourage participation in public meetings and requires the City and City Council to take specific actions, particularly among underrepresented communities and non-English-speaking communities. She stated that the proposed resolution defining reasonable efforts to encourage participation establishes the City’s outreach approach to include media serving non-English-speaking communities in the distribution of meeting agendas, notices, or other meeting-related information. She added that the City of Anaheim would continue to maintain methods for members of the public to access meeting agendas and related materials electronically through the City’s website. She noted that the City would continue to provide the option of members of the public to receive meeting agendas, notices, or other updates through the City’s online “Notify Me” system. She reported that in addition, the City would provide meeting information through existing communication channels and partnerships with community-based organizations, neighborhood groups, civic organizations, and organizations serving non-English-speaking communities, as well as utilizing City newsletters, social media platforms, public counters, bulletin boards, and outreach at community meetings. She added that the efforts identified in the Resolution are intended to provide a flexible framework for outreach and public participation with broad discretion in defining these reasonable efforts and clarifies that failure to provide notice to any specific group does not create a basis for legal action, pursuant to the statute.

She noted that staff is prepared to modify, expand, and adjust outreach methods over time based on evolving communication practices, changes in technology, and the needs of the community. She added that SB 707 requires an accessible internet webpage dedicated to information concerning public meetings and how members of the public may participate, including a link to the page on the agency’s home page. She reported that the requirement has been met by having a prominent link to “Council Meetings” on the City’s homepage.

City Clerk Bass reported that SB 707 requirements and implementation need to be completed by July 1, 2026, City Council’s consideration and action will put the infrastructure in place to ensure a seamless transition, with the first meeting with remote participation fully implemented at the Council meeting of July 14. She stated that the adoption of a Telephonic or Internet Service Disruption Policy will provide a clear playbook for when technology fails; Adoption of Public Posting Board for Publicly Translated Agendas Policy ensures language is no longer a barrier to participation and provides members of the public the opportunity to post translated agendas to reflect the diversity of our community. She added that defining 'reasonable efforts' for outreach means the City is being intentional, moving beyond just posting a notice on a wall and actively encouraging participation. She reported that amending and restating the Council Rules of Order is to integrate remote participation and includes updates to the public comment time limit for legislative matters to three (3) minutes per speaker from five (5) minutes to be consistent with members of the public addressing on quasi- judicial matters; all other public comment time limits remain unchanged. She outlined the current time limits for public comments: three (3) minutes for agenda items and general comments, 20 minutes for project applicants, 10 minutes for rebuttals, 10 minutes for property owners in the noticed area, and three (3) minutes for those outside the noticed area. She stated that the updates are not about legal compliance; they are about ensuring every resident—regardless of their primary language or whether City Council Minutes of May 12, 2026

they can physically be in the Council Chamber- has the opportunity to participate in their local council meeting.

DISCUSSION: Council Member Meeks commented that the proposed multilingual bulletin board process appeared inconsistent, noting concerns that agendas translated by third parties could be posted alongside an English disclaimer stating the City could not guarantee the accuracy of the translations. She added that online translation tools are already available through the City's website and suggested monitoring how the bulletin board process functions in practice.

City Clerk Bass acknowledged Council Member Meeks’ concerns and stated that the City would monitor how the multilingual bulletin board is used, including which translations are most frequently utilized. She added that the process could be refined over time, including updating the disclaimer to appear in additional languages if appropriate.

MOTION: Council Member Meeks moved to approve the item.

DISCUSSION: Council Member Balius suggested clarifying the meeting disruption policy to specify that qualifying disruptions refer only to failures of the City's remote meeting services, not connectivity issues experienced by individual participants.

City Clerk Bass stated that the policy could be revised to make clear that disruptions apply only to City-provided streaming and remote participation services.

In response to Council Member Balius, City Clerk Bass clarified that remote participation by an entire subsidiary body would require City Council approval. She noted that remote participation options for boards and commissions could be considered separately, but clarified that SB 707 applies specifically to city councils and does not extend to boards and commissions.

Council Member Rubalcava clarified that the proposed language does not automatically limit public comments to one minute, noting that it preserves the Council's discretion to reduce speaking time, such as to one minute per speaker, only when necessary to accommodate a large number of public commenters.

City Clerk Bass clarified that the proposed amendments do not reduce public comment time to one minute. She noted that the only substantive change to the Rules of Order is revising the public comment time for public hearings on legislative matters to three minutes, while all other speaking time limits remain unchanged. She added that the existing 90-minute general public comment guideline remains a procedural practice and provides flexibility to continue general public comments to after Council Business, if necessary.

In response to Council Member Rubalcava, City Clerk Bass explained the proposed public comment process would include participation from in-person speakers followed by remote speakers. She also spoke of the use of an online speaker form to allow remote participants to identify whether they wish to speak on agenda items or general public comments, enabling staff to better organize and manage remote participation during meetings.

Council Member Rubalcava inquired whether remote speakers would be required to provide identifying information, such as their name and contact information, similar to in-person speaker cards, and whether participants joining remotely would be required to have their cameras turned on while providing public comment.

City Council Minutes of May 12, 2026

City Clerk Bass explained that remote speakers would be asked to provide certain identifying information through an online speaker form, similar to in-person public comment cards. She noted that contact information would be optional, but speakers who wish to receive a response from the City Council or staff would be encouraged to include it.

In response to Council Member Rubalcava, City Clerk Bass clarified that remote public participation would be audio-only. She added that remote speakers will be able to view the meeting.

Council Member Rubalcava expressed support for allowing remote public participation, noting that it improves access for residents who cannot attend meetings in person. She expressed appreciation for staff’s clarification that the proposed changes do not limit public participation.

MOTION: Council Member Meeks moved to approve the item, seconded by Council Member Rubalcava.

DISCUSSION: Mayor Pro Tem Leon thanked the City Clerk and staff for their work on the updates.

He requested clarification that the addition of remote public participation would not affect the public’s ability to continue attending and speaking at Council meetings in person.

City Clerk Bass confirmed that remote participation was intended to expand public access and does not change existing opportunities for in-person participation or the submission of written public comments. She explained that remote participation would serve as an additional option for members of the public to engage in Council meetings.

In response to Mayor Pro Tem Leon, City Clerk Bass clarified that ADA-related teleconferencing provisions apply specifically to Council Members, providing additional accommodations for members who require them. She noted that under those provisions, a Council Member receiving an ADA accommodation would not be required to appear on camera while participating remotely.

Mayor Pro Tem Leon requested clarification on the distinction between the proposed ADA teleconferencing provisions and the City’s current procedures for remote participation by Council Members.

City Clerk Bass explained that the City will continue to use traditional teleconferencing procedures, which require advance notice and posting of the remote location. She added that the proposed changes expand remote participation options by allowing Council Members to participate remotely under specified circumstances, including emergencies, illnesses, ADA accommodations, and other "just cause" situations authorized by State law, providing greater flexibility while remaining compliant with statutory requirements.

In response to Mayor Pro Tem Leon, City Clerk Bass outlined a comprehensive public outreach plan to promote new remote participation options. She explained that the City would create a dedicated webpage accessible from the homepage in English and Spanish, with additional language translations available through the website's translation feature. She added that outreach efforts would include social media, attending community meetings, newsletters, utility bill inserts, public information displays, bulletin boards, and coordination with other City departments to ensure residents are informed about the new participation options and upcoming Council meetings.

Mayor Pro Tem Leon requested clarification on the remote speaker queue process.

City Clerk Bass explained that the Zoom webinar would remain open for the public to observe the meeting. She reported that individuals wishing to provide public comment would be asked to submit City Council Minutes of May 12, 2026

an online speaker form by 5:00 p.m., identifying the item on which they wish to speak. She noted that speakers would be called in order by name or for phone participants, by the last digits of their telephone number.

In response to Mayor Pro Tem Leon, City Clerk Bass clarified that requiring advance submission of an online speaker form is an administrative process to help organize and manage remote public comments, ensuring speakers are recognized and called for the appropriate agenda item. She noted that the procedure was not mandated by State law, but intended to facilitate orderly and effective remote participation while complying with State requirements for two-way public access.

Mayor Pro Tem Leon inquired if the process was consistent with other cities' policies.

City Clerk Bass explained that cities use different procedures to manage remote public comments.

She noted that the proposed online speaker form was intended to organize speakers by agenda item, general public comment, and public hearing category, ensuring each speaker is recognized at the appropriate time and receives the correct time allotted for speaking.

In response to Council Member Maahs, City Clerk Bass confirmed that the updates were proposed in compliance with State law and meant to increase public engagement, language equity, and remote access.

Council Member Maahs inquired about the one-hour minimum for the Technology Disruption Policy.

City Clerk Bass stated that she was not aware of the rationale behind the one-hour minimum, noting that the requirement was included in the legislation.

Council Member Kurtz requested clarification regarding remote participation procedures for Council Members.

City Clerk Bass explained that Council Members participating remotely would be participating via Zoom, to comply with SB 707’s provisions for two-way communication. She clarified that under the new "just cause" provisions established by state law, Council Members may participate remotely for qualifying emergencies or family-related circumstances without posting the remote location, consistent with the updated legislation.

In response to Council Member Balius, City Clerk Bass clarified that the 20- minute speaking time only applied to project applications and appellants during public hearings, including ten (10) minutes for rebuttals. She added that speakers within the noticed area receive ten (10) minutes to speak. She explained that remote speakers addressing public hearing items will be asked to indicate whether they are within the noticed area and provide their address for verification. She noted that the process mirrors the City's existing procedure for in-person speakers, whose addresses are verified to determine eligibility for speaking time applicable to those within the noticed area.

MOTION: Council Member Meeks moved to approve RESOLUTION NO. 2026-050 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM establishing Council Policy No.

1.14 regarding the City’s policy in response to telephonic or internet service disruption during public meeting, as amended to clarify disruption to “City” services, RESOLUTION NO. 2026-051 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM establishing Council Policy No.

1.15 establishing a public posting board for publicly translated agendas, as amended, to update Section C in Council Policy No. 1.15 to read removal of agendas on the day following the Council meeting, RESOLUTION NO. 2026-052 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM determining reasonable efforts to encourage public participation in City Council Minutes of May 12, 2026

meetings pursuant to Government Code § 54953.4, and RESOLUTION NO. 2026-053 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM amending and restating the procedures and rules of order for the conduct of City Council meetings, seconded by Council Member Rubalcava. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES – 7 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Leon, Balius, Rubalcava, Kurtz, Maahs, and Meeks); NOES – 0. Motion carried.

REPORT ON CLOSED SESSION ACTIONS: None
PUBLIC COMMENTS (non-agenda items): None
COUNCIL AGENDA SETTING:

Council Member Meeks requested a recognition for the Quick Track Club for reaching the National Track and Field Championships.

ADJOURNMENT: With no further business before the Council, Mayor Aitken adjourned the City Council in memory of Richard “Dick” LaRochelle and Mary Hirahara, at 9:36 p.m.

Respectfully submitted,
Theresa Bass, CMC
City Clerk