ANAHEIM CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 22, 2026
The regular meeting of September 22, 2026 was called to order at 5:01 p.m. in the Council Chamber of Anaheim City Hall, located at 200 South Anaheim Boulevard. The meeting notice, agenda, and related material were duly posted on September 17, 2026.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ashleigh E. Aitken and Council Members Carlos A. Leon, Ryan Balius, Natalie Rubalcava, Norma Campos Kurtz, Kristen M. Maahs, and Natalie Meeks
STAFF PRESENT: Interim City Manager Greg Garcia, City Attorney Robert Fabela, and City Clerk Theresa Bass
INVOCATION: Pastor Stephen Scherer, Kindred Community Church FLAG SALUTE: Council Member Ryan Balius
PRESENTATIONS: Recognizing Nadia Martinez of the Housing & Community Development Department for being honored as an Unsung Hero by United Way of Orange County
Mayor Aitken recognized Nadia Martinez of the Housing and Community Development Department for her recent recognition by United Way as an Unsung Hero for her incredible work. She noted that the recognition praises Nadia’s heroic work on behalf of some of the neediest and most deserving in the community. She shared that Nadia worked tirelessly to ensure continued stable housing for a senior who struggled through years of housing insecurity and faced the prospect of losing their emergency housing support. She reported that Nadia worked directly with the Housing Authority and with her expertise and dedication, the senior was able to return to stable housing. She thanked Nadia for her empathy, commitment to providing incredible service, and for going above and beyond to help others. She expressed gratitude for having Nadia on the Anaheim team.
Recognizing Andy Nogal for his retirement as City of Anaheim's Housing and Community Development Deputy Director
Mayor Aitken recognized Deputy Director of Housing and Community Development Andy Nogal on his retirement from the Department. She noted that he has been a champion for affordable housing and played a transformative role in creating quality housing in reach of Anaheim residents. She shared that Andy has been part of a team that brought nearly 3,000 affordable apartments to Anaheim since 2005. She noted that he played a key role in the Affordable Housing Strategic Plan which set a five-year goal to create more than 2,812 affordable places to call home in the City. She reported that he has worked to ensure that affordable housing projects are thoughtfully designed and reflect what the community needs helping to create communities that not only benefit those who live there, but entire neighborhoods. She congratulated him and wished him the best in his retirement.
Deputy Director Andy Nogal expressed gratitude for the recognition and reflected on his commitment to the Anaheim community and the mission of creating affordable housing for the community’s most vulnerable residents. He thanked the City Council, former Council Members, executive leadership, and the Housing and Community Development team for their support and collaboration. He expressed confidence that the team would continue advancing the Department’s mission and thanked the City’s executive team for helping the Department successfully accomplish its goals.
City Council Minutes of September 22, 2026
Recognizing Marco Lucero for his retirement as City of Anaheim's Housing and Community Development's Workforce Development Manager Mayor Aitken recognized Workforce Development Manager Marco Lucero on his retirement after 29 years with the City. She shared that he started back in 1997 as a management intern for the Finance Department. She noted that he worked in several roles before becoming part of the Workforce Development team, where he led job fairs connecting Anaheim workers and the City’s leading businesses, and youth mentorship programs that have helped prepare a new generation to enter the workforce. She thanked him for all the years he’s dedicated to the Anaheim community. She wished him the best in his retirement.
Recognizing September 2026, as Service Club Month
Mayor Aitken recognized September 2026 as Service Club Month. She noted that every September, the City takes a moment to celebrate service clubs which are a driving force behind so much good in Anaheim. She explained that the time and energy each of the service club members gives cannot go unnoticed. She stated that the service clubs all strengthen neighborhoods, bring people together, and lead the way in creating positive change. She noted that their work touches the lives of everyone across the City and inspires others to give back and make a difference. She stated that Anaheim is lucky to have a strong network of service clubs, and the City wouldn’t be what it is with them. She noted that they provide opportunities for everyone to get involved and join you in serving our community. She encouraged everyone to learn more about our amazing service clubs and find a way to get involved and be a part of a better Anaheim.
The recognition was accepted by Kiwanis Club, Anaheim Rotary Club, Anaheim Hills Rotary Club, Lions Club, Anaheim Beautiful, Assistance League of Anaheim, Anaheim Veterans of Foreign Wars Post 3173, El Bekal Shriners Group, Ebell Club of Anaheim, and American Legion Post 72.
ACCEPTANCE OF OTHER RECOGNITIONS (To be presented at a later date):
Recognizing September 10 - 19, 2026, as Welcoming Week
Recognizing September 17 - 23, 2026, as Constitution Week Recognizing September 2026, as National Suicide Prevention Awareness Month
Recognizing September 2026, as Library Card Sign‐Up Month Recognizing September 2026, as World Alzheimer's Awareness Month At 5:25 p.m., Mayor Aitken called to order the Anaheim Housing and Public Improvements Authority, in joint session with the City Council.
ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDAS: None
PUBLIC COMMENTS (all agenda items): Prior to receipt of public comments, City Clerk Theresa Bass provided an outline of procedures for public comments in-person and remotely, notice of translation services, automated live captioning in the Webinar, and a brief decorum statement.
City Clerk Theresa Bass reported that a total of eleven (11) public comments were received electronically prior to 3:00 p.m. [A final total of sixteen (16) public comments were received electronically and distributed to the City Council].
City Council Minutes of September 22, 2026
R. Joshua Collins encouraged the Council to establish designated safe parking areas for individuals experiencing homelessness who are living in their vehicles. He noted that vehicles often serve as individuals’ primary remaining form of shelter and urged the City to provide safe, orderly overnight parking with services such as security, sanitation, case management, and connections to permanent housing. He stated that he had previously submitted a petition supporting safe parking and encouraged the Council and community to support the effort.
Lupe Zamarron addressed the Council in support of Item No. 17, which proposed creating a tenant protection webpage and online reporting form to educate renters about their rights and allow them to report potential rent increases or eviction violations. She thanked staff and Council Member Rubalcava for advancing the issue and described concerns about housing affordability, declining student enrollment, school closures, job losses, and residents being forced to leave Anaheim. She urged the Council to consider rent control or a rent freeze and take additional action to help families remain in their homes.
Adrian thanked staff including the City Attorney’s Office and Housing and Community Development Department, for preparing the informational report, and thanked Council Member Rubalcava for bringing the tenant protection issue forward. He expressed support for the proposed tenant protection webpage and intake form and encouraged other Council Members to support efforts addressing the needs of Anaheim renters, whom he stated comprise approximately 55 percent of the City’s population. He acknowledged the staff and budget limitations, including that the proposed program would not provide additional resources for full enforcement of the Tenant Protection Act (TCA). He raised concerns regarding the collection and handling of sensitive tenant information through the online intake form, noting the importance of appropriate privacy and data safeguards. He encouraged the City to make aggregate, non-identifying data available so nonprofit and community organizations could better understand tenant concerns and determine where resources and outreach efforts are most needed. He recommended expanding the proposed program beyond the Tenant Protection Act to address other State laws and local codes. He referenced a tenant at Mercy Housing who was experiencing mold issues and suggested that the program provide additional avenues for tenants to report Code Enforcement and housing-condition concerns that may fall outside the Tenant Protection Act. He encouraged the City to broaden the program to address a wider range of tenant protections and housing-related concerns.
Vern Nelson expressed support for Item No. 17 as an initial step toward enforcing existing California tenant protection and rent control laws, however, criticized the length of time it took for the item to be presented. He questioned why enforcement efforts had not been pursued sooner and expressed concern that renters may have been displaced, illegally evicted, or pushed into homelessness due to allegedly unlawful rent increases and evictions. He noted that the California Tenant Protection Act was enacted in 2019 without a local enforcement mechanism and questioned whether the proposed program would address violations that occurred during the previous seven years, including unlawful rent increases and evictions. He raised concerns about the impact of housing displacement on families, homelessness, overcrowding, and declining school enrollment and education funding. He encouraged the Council to support Item No. 17 but urged the City to take additional action, including considering rent stabilization and stronger tenant protections. He supported a rent stabilization proposal and concluded by calling for justice for Albert Arzola.
City Clerk Theresa Bass reported there were no remote speakers related to agenda items.
Dave Duran expressed appreciation for Deputy Director of Housing and Community Development Sandra Lozeau and Housing Coordinator Tracey Garcia for assisting a disabled 71-year-old woman with dementia who was facing eviction after critical forms were not completed due to her disabilities.
He praised their efforts to review the resident’s circumstances, provide appropriate consideration and City Council Minutes of September 22, 2026
accommodation, and help her remain housed rather than face homelessness. He raised concerns regarding allegations involving Mayor Aitken using a derogatory racial term. He stated that such language was deeply offensive, particularly given the significant Mexican American and Latino population in Anaheim, and emphasized that all residents and neighborhoods, regardless of race or ethnicity, deserve dignity, respect, equal treatment, and protection of their civil rights. He called for the Mayor to resign.
G. Price spoke regarding allegations against Mayor Aitken for discrimination toward a City employee.
She contrasted the allegations with the Mayor’s legal background and public emphasis on protecting rights, accountability, and faith, and questioned how such alleged conduct aligns with those principles. She called for the allegations to be taken seriously, investigated, and appropriately addressed, emphasizing that no individual should be exempt from accountability. She expressed support for City employees and whistleblowers who come forward with concerns, encouraging them not to feel silenced or isolated and thanked them for their courage.
Mike Robbins expressed concern over allegations involving Mayor Aitken and the impact of the allegation on trust between Anaheim’s Hispanic and Latino communities and City government. He referenced other concerns involving allegations of Police use of force against Latino residents and argued that residents should expect fair treatment and respect from their elected officials. He questioned whether residents’ ethnicity or neighborhoods influenced the respect and services they received from City government and stated that Hispanic and Latino residents deserve leadership that builds confidence in government. He expressed support for the employee and other whistleblowers who have come forward and called for Mayor Aitken’s resignation.
Tom Fielder stated that the City has received repeated warnings regarding scandals, lawsuits, whistleblower allegations, retaliation claims, alleged misuse of taxpayer funds, and concerns about water quality, but has continued without addressing them. He referenced recent allegations involving the Mayor and urged the City not to dismiss the allegations. He expressed his support for the employee and called for Mayor Aitken’s resignation.
Stephanie Mercadante raised concerns regarding Anaheim’s water issues and broader concerns about transparency and accountability within City Hall. She questioned whether residents’ and employees’ concerns had been properly investigated, including whether whistleblowers were interviewed and evidence was reviewed. She criticized the City for allegedly dismissing or publicly criticizing residents who raised concerns rather than addressing their questions. She expressed concerns about delays, redactions, changing deadlines, and unanswered questions related to public records, explaining that transparency requires timely access to information. She urged the City to investigate the water quality concerns, interview whistleblowers, follow the evidence, and release public records. She called for Mayor Aitken’s resignation and expressed support for the employee involved in the allegations.
Jeanine Robbins alleged that City employees who raise concerns or whistleblowers who come forward face retaliation rather than protection. She cited past scandals and stated that promises of reform, transparency, and accountability had not been fulfilled. She addressed allegations made against Mayor Aitken including the alleged use of a racial slur. She criticized the Mayor’s public statements about faith, accountability, and transparency and the allegations against her. She called on City leadership, including the Interim City Manager, City Attorney, and City Council, to take greater responsibility for addressing alleged misconduct and City scandals. She expressed support for the employee and stated that the allegations were particularly concerning given Anaheim’s Latino community. She called for the Mayor’s immediate resignation.
City Council Minutes of September 22, 2026
Cecil Jordan Corkern raised concerns regarding the safety of children and visitors at Disneyland. He referenced the Bible regarding the protection of children. He discussed efforts to promote safety at Disney.
Mark Richard Daniels reflected on his experience on September 11, 2001. He stated that he initially thought it was an accident similar to the 1945 Empire State Building incident, and became increasingly alarmed as reports of additional attacks at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania emerged.
He explained that the experience represented a moment where the world changed and remains difficult to forget. He encouraged the Council to gather additional information before making judgments on allegations involving the Mayor.
Art Castillo stated that he raised concerns about the treatment of Mexican residents in neighborhoods that had become predominantly Latino and questioned why residents were being treated as secondclass citizens. He alleged that, after raising concerns, he experienced harassment from teachers, City staff, and others, and that they were illegally terminated. He added that individuals posing as City or Police Department personnel were involved when they attempted to file grievances, and said these experiences resulted in significant personal and financial losses, including the loss of approximately $1 million in investments. He explained that he had repeatedly attempted to seek assistance from City staff and managers but felt they were unable to obtain a meaningful resolution. He urged the Council to respond to members of the public with dignity, impartiality, and compassion, particularly those grieving loved ones or raising concerns about alleged abuse involving their children. He emphasized that elected officials are held to a higher standard and should represent everyone. He encouraged Council Members and public officials to exercise restraint, avoid responding with anger or profanity, and recognize residents' right to advocate and express their frustrations.
Bryant Johnson expressed concern about increasing cynicism and lack of enthusiasm among young people regarding elections and voting. He attributed it to negative campaigning, limited candidate choices, and concerns that preferred candidates may have little chance of winning. He advocated for implementing ranked-choice voting, explaining that the system allows voters to rank candidates and uses successive tabulations until a candidate receives a majority of continuing ballots. He stated that ranked-choice voting could reduce plurality-based outcomes, negative campaigning, and concerns about spoiler candidates, citing Anaheim’s 2018 and 2022 mayoral elections as examples where the winning candidates received less than a majority of the vote. He referenced a 2025 Redondo Beach exit poll in which 83 percent of respondents found ranked-choice voting easy to use and 61 percent supported it. He acknowledged that ranked-choice voting could not be implemented for the current election but urged the City to use the period leading up to the 2028 elections to research the system, identify potential issues, and determine implementation costs. He suggested reviewing the City of Irvine’s experience with ranked-choice voting as a potential reference and encouraged Anaheim, as the largest city in Orange County, to consider providing voters with additional ways to express their preferences.
Erika Nguyen (Miller), speaking on behalf of Chance Theater, invited the Mayor and City Council to attend the theater’s current production of The Bed Trick by Keiko Green, noting that Green was a Chance Theater resident playwright in 2023 and has since had her work produced by major regional theaters. She described the production as a contemporary adaptation exploring desire, friendship, deception, intimacy, and consent, and said it reflects Chance Theater’s mission of supporting artists and socially conscious storytelling. She also invited the Council to Chance Theater’s Annual Fundraising Gala on October 17, which will feature an Irish theme, Celtic music, food, and returning performers from Once. She encouraged those unable to attend to consider making a donation or contributing an auction item to support the theater and local artists. She recognized Chance Theater’s founding Executive Artistic Director, Oánh Nguyễn, for being honored at the Anaheim High School Alumni Hall of Fame event and thanked Council Member Rubalcava for serving as the event’s City Council Minutes of September 22, 2026
emcee. She emphasized Chance Theater’s longstanding connection to Anaheim and expressed pride in the theater’s role in the City’s creative community.
Mazatl Tepehyolotzin honored the late Scott Keltz, whom they described as an ally and advocate for Native American history and communities. He recalled meeting Keltz through the Fullerton College Native American Club and discussed their experiences learning about Indigenous history and culture.
He referenced conversations with Assemblymembers James Ramos and Avelino Valencia regarding Native American and Mexican Indigenous history, language, and identity, and expressed support for efforts to expand Native American history education and establish a Native American holiday. He advocated for greater recognition and respect for Indigenous peoples, including Native American code talkers and Indigenous communities connected to Mexico and California. He thanked City representatives for permitting what they described as the first Native American mural in an alley on Pauline Street and urged consideration of changing a school-related name they viewed as connected to colonization. He concluded by encouraging the community to learn more about the history of Spanish and English colonization and its effects on Indigenous peoples, including religious and cultural practices.
Viridiana Cortes followed up on concerns she raised at the August 25 meeting regarding alleged prostitution and loitering near the CVS parking lot at Beach Boulevard and Orange Avenue. She thanked the Mayor, Council, and Council Member Balius for addressing conditions at the nearby bus stop, including power washing, window cleaning, and trash removal. She stated had observed less open prostitution activity and loitering since her initial comments. She added that she had continued reporting incidents to the non-emergency police line on August 28, September 3, and September 18, but remained concerned about the area, particularly its proximity to a community revitalization housing project and a police station. She urged the Council not to pursue ordinances that would impose citations or civil action against businesses along Beach Boulevard, stating that such measures could negatively affect local businesses. She encouraged the City to focus enforcement on the street activity itself and referenced approaches being used in neighboring Buena Park and Stanton, including increased police visibility, mounted patrols, additional sheriff’s hours, and enforcement tools addressing public exposure. She added that she would contact State representatives as previously recommended and requested that the Council continue the steps already taken to address the issue.
Francisco thanked Mayor Pro Tem Leon for previously assisting tenants who they said were facing illegal evictions and stated that the tenants were doing well. He criticized racism and classism in Anaheim, alleging that these attitudes contribute to the diversion of community resources, illegal evictions, inadequate responses to homelessness, and the criminalization of unhoused residents. He raised concerns about alleged misuse of elected positions, including access to high-profile event seats, travel, and transparency regarding public information. He expressed concerns about the rising cost of living, homelessness, and the lack of affordable housing, stating that longtime Anaheim residents have been forced to leave the City or State. He added that the trends also affect schools as families leave the community and questioned the City’s focus on luxury housing rather than housing affordable to existing residents. He cited local income levels and housing costs as evidence that many residents struggle to remain in Anaheim and concluded by expressing concern that Mexican and longtime residents feel disrespected and pushed out of the community.
Elia Renteria addressed the importance of Council Members being present and engaged in Anaheim neighborhoods, listening to residents and addressing concerns before they become larger issues.
She expressed support for the City’s efforts to connect renters with information and resources, the speaker questioned why some neighborhood concerns take so long to reach the Council. She shared her experience working with the Family Justice Center, a back-to-school program supporting working families, the Anaheim Mounted Enforcement Unit, and programs supporting Anaheim women, the City Council Minutes of September 22, 2026
speaker emphasized that community support and public safety should be accompanied by careful scrutiny of how City resources are used. She urged the Council to be proactive, informed, and accountable as Anaheim considers significant decisions involving Angel Stadium, City assets, development agreements, contracts, and public funds. She encouraged Council Members to review agreements carefully, ask difficult questions, and consider their long-term financial impacts to ensure decisions serve Anaheim residents. She concluded that residents deserve a Council that is present, diligent, proactive, and responsible in protecting City resources and serving renters, seniors, working families, and the broader community.
David Garcia expressed support for Item 17 and the City Attorney’s Tenant Protection Program but raised concerns about how the program would assist renters facing potentially unlawful evictions. He questioned what happens after a renter submits the City’s tenant protection inquiry form, noting that the City Attorney is not the renter’s attorney and that submitting the form does not stop an eviction or court deadlines. He highlighted the short timeframe to respond to an eviction lawsuit and expressed concern that referrals to outside legal services, which may take several business days to respond, could leave renters without timely assistance. He emphasized the financial hardship of losing housing, citing the cost of securing a new two-bedroom apartment in the 92805 ZIP Code, including first month’s rent, security deposit, moving expenses, application fees, utilities, and lost wages, particularly for working families, seniors, and individuals with disabilities. He questioned what the new program provides that was not already available in 2024, when the City was referring tenants to Public Law Center and Community Legal Aid. He inquired whether those organizations are formal partners, whether they have sufficient capacity to handle increased referrals, and whether the City tracks whether tenants actually receive assistance or merely receive a referral. He questioned the report’s statement that the program will initially rely on existing City Attorney staff, with additional resources considered after sufficient data is collected, asking what criteria would determine when additional staffing or funding would be provided.
Sergio Pelayo referenced a recent news article regarding allegations against the Mayor and expressed broader concerns about racism and the treatment of Latino residents, stating that their family had been encouraged to “trust the process” but continued to see reports that caused them to question City leadership. He criticized Council Member Rubalcava for publicly defending Anaheim Police Department union leaders and raised concerns regarding the conduct and history of Officer Nathan Garcia in connection with the death of his cousin, Albert Arzola. He reported alleged harassment against Albert and a previous excessive-force allegation and questioned why Officer Garcia was permitted to remain assigned to the Gang Enforcement Unit. He questioned the circumstances surrounding Albert’s death, including body-worn camera audio, the identity of another officer whose body camera was allegedly turned off, the use of force, and the police response at the residence, including children being removed from the home at gunpoint. He questioned whether Department leadership was aware of Officer Garcia’s prior conduct and whether police assignments and enforcement practices contributed to the incident. He questioned officer training and whether policing and arrest practices connected to Disney and the Anaheim Police Department created incentives related to arrests. He expressed support for the passage of “Albert’s Law”.
Marisol Arzola sought justice for her nephew Albert Arzola. She emphasized that Latino residents contribute to Anaheim through property and sales taxes and expressed criticism of Council Member Rubalcava for posting Officer Nathan Garcia. She questioned Council Member Rubalcava’s commitment to the Anaheim community and stated that residents were calling for her resignation.
She added that she has been speaking with community members about Council Member Rubalcava and encouraged residents to participate in the November election.
Pearl Arzola criticized Mayor Aitken regarding recent allegations and expressed concerns about the Mayor’s conduct and priorities. She stated that as a as a Latino resident, they felt the community’s City Council Minutes of September 22, 2026
opportunities were being undermined by alleged police shootings and harassment, including the death of their brother involving Anaheim Police Department officers. She questioned the Mayor’s record after four years in office and expressed concern regarding housing affordability, stagnant wages, wildfire-prone development, small businesses, and the treatment of working-class residents.
She questioned whether City leadership was more responsive to campaign donors and Disney interests than to taxpayers and working families. She stated that she would not support the Mayor or Council Member Rubalcava in the November election and encouraged residents to vote for other candidates.
Grace Arzola spoke in support of her nephew, Albert Arzola, calling for justice and accountability. She criticized the Mayor over reported remarks regarding Latino residents and urged her to reflect on the statements and resign if they were made. She questioned whether the Mayor would have responded differently if a white resident had been killed and expressed frustration that, nine months after Albert’s death, the family had not received answers or been able to secure a meeting with the Mayor. She also criticized the City over recurring lawsuits and questioned whether additional accountability was needed for police officers, City employees, and elected officials. She emphasized the importance of respecting democracy, individual rights, and personal differences, including sexual orientation. She emphasized the importance of Latino voters and her hope that Anaheim would elect leaders who are accountable to and representative of the community.
Leslie L. spoke in support of her cousin, Albert Arzola, and expressed concern over a Los Angeles Times article regarding allegations involving the Mayor. She questioned whether the allegations contributed to her family feeling that their concerns had not been taken seriously or that City officials had been unwilling to meet with them. She emphasized that Albert came from a hardworking and educated family, graduated from high school, and was deeply loved by his relatives. She expressed concerns about the circumstances surrounding her cousin’s death and the subsequent treatment of her family, including alleged delays in transporting Albert to a nearby hospital, the handling of his body, and the detention of several young children during the police response. She questioned why Officer Nathan Garcia remains with the Anaheim Police Department and criticized a lack of accountability and answers. She stated that her family has been repeatedly asked to respect the process while continuing to experience grief and unanswered questions. She concluded by calling for justice for Albert and respectful treatment of Anaheim’s Mexican and Hispanic communities.
Anonymous 6 (Card No. 6706) stated that there has been no progress to the concerns he raised approximately three months ago. He corrected a prior statement regarding an employee and their positions based on their email signature. He raised concerns about the compensation and treatment of Anaheim Convention Center duty managers. He cited the City’s Personnel Rules, stating that positions with similar duties and responsibilities should be classified and compensated uniformly, arguing that the policy was not being followed. He stated that duty managers serve as assistants and relief for event managers and perform substantially similar duties, but receive approximately $22 per hour compared with event managers earning roughly $72 to $150 per hour. He attributed retention problems to low pay and lack of benefits, noting that only four of the 13 current duty managers had been with the Convention Center for more than a year, while four had been recently hired. He criticized the exclusion of duty managers from a prior employee reunion and raised concerns about the treatment of 30-hour part-time employees and efforts to obtain additional benefits for them.
Ariel Espinosa spoke in support of his cousin, Albert Arzola, and called for justice regarding his death.
He criticized the Anaheim Police Department and City Council and urged the City to terminate Officer Nathan Garcia. She criticized Mayor Aitken and Council Member Rubalcava and concluded by reiterating for justice for Albert Arzola.
City Council Minutes of September 22, 2026
Penelope, a District 2 resident, organizer, volunteer, and Mexican mother, expressed concern regarding a Los Angeles Times article alleging racist and homophobic comments by the Mayor, particularly the reported use of the term “dirty Mexican.” She reflected on the City’s 2024 enforcement of street vendors, stating that vendors lost merchandise and income and received citations, and referenced broader concerns about families being separated and the impact on children. She also expressed solidarity with Albert Arzola’s family and their continued efforts to seek justice. She questioned whether racism and discrimination had influenced City decisions and urged the Mayor to respond directly to community concerns and accept accountability for her actions.
Rosie Camacho reflected on the December 2025 death of her son Albert Arzola. She expressed frustration that the family had received no response or resolution from the City and criticized the Mayor and City staff over reported use of the term “dirty Mexicans.” She alleged that racism influenced the treatment of her family and described witnessing her son being shot and his body being dragged. She called for the release of the complete body-worn camera footage and other video from the incident, stating that the family continues to seek answers and justice. She urged the City to fire the officer involved and criticized the police response, including officers allegedly entering the scene with guns drawn while children were present. She concluded by reiterating her demand for justice for Albert Arzola and accountability from City leadership.
Javier expressed disappointment in the City Council.
Kenneth Batiste expressed support for the Arzola family and concern that false information contributes to hatred and division. He reflected on historical racism in Orange County and Anaheim and referenced the City’s history, as well as the treatment of Black and Latino communities. He recalled supporting the Mayor during her campaign and noted her outreach to the Latino community, including speaking Spanish at a UNITE HERE! event. He shared his history an activist, including advocating for district-based elections, and raised concerns about Disney’s influence in Anaheim and the alleged distribution of COVID-19 funds. He expressed disappointment and concern regarding a recent article about the Mayor and an alleged incident involving alcohol, stating that the lack of a response to the allegations was troubling and could undermine public trust. He concluded by emphasizing the importance of diversity, faith, love, and trust in public institutions.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS:
Council Member Kurtz shared that she represented the City in Washington, D.C., along with Council Member Balius and Council Member Maahs, to meet with several congressional members to discuss funding for the LA28 Olympics. She noted substantive meetings with the Department of Commerce and the Economic Development Department to discuss potential infrastructure grants for Anaheim.
She added that she met with the Department of Labor to discuss the need for support for apprentice programs for youth and accessibility to the programs. She emphasized the need for trades as new generations enter the workforce. Council Member Kurtz thanked the Howard Johnson Hotel and the Anaheim Hotel for contacting the Housing and Community Development Department to offer surplus items for community use. She thanked Deputy Director Sandra Lozeau for her quick response and confirmation that the City would accept the items to distribute to the community. Council Member Kurtz invited residents to attend a virtual bus tour of District 4 at Betsy Ross Elementary School on September 30th at 5:30 p.m. to learn about developments and vacant properties, including the former Luigi’s property, a vacant 8.9-acre property at Anaheim Boulevard and Ball Road, and the L3 property on Vermont Avenue.
Council Member Meeks thanked the Service Clubs who attended in recognition of Service Club Month. She highlighted their work in the community and encouraged the public to join a service club to make a difference in the community. Council Member Meeks called for an immediate and expedited investigation into the allegations made against the Mayor. She explained that the City Council Minutes of September 22, 2026
community deserves to have the accusations taken seriously. She stated that, if the allegations were substantiated, she would support calls for the Mayor’s resignation, and emphasized the need to resolve the matter promptly.
Council Member Maahs shared her service on the Orange County Older Adults Advisory Committee and announced the release of the Older Adult Resource Guide and the Caregiver Resource Guide.
She reported that the guides are available on the OC Navigator website and are available in different languages, including Spanish, Vietnamese, Tagalog, Korean, and Chinese. She emphasized the importance of public knowledge and access regarding the resources. Council Member Maahs invited the public to a clean-up event at Miraloma Family Resource Center on Saturday, September 26th.
She stated that the clean-up would also cover the Center’s surrounding neighborhood. Council Member Maahs highlighted Deputy Director Sandra Lozeau for assisting a family who had been living in a shelter for more than a year. She noted that following outreach from a local junior high on August 6 th
, the family was connected with resources and moved into permanent housing by September 8 th
.
She thanked the Housing and Community Development Department, including Director Grace RuizStepter, Deputy Director Lozeau, and her team, Nam, Jocelyn, and Mario, for their efforts in connecting the family with housing and support.
Council Member Balius highlighted Love Anaheim and Nathan Zug for their volunteer opportunity throughout West Anaheim. He noted that approximately 300 volunteers attended the event and completed many projects in the community. He thanked Love Anaheim for their work in the community. Council Member Balius requested to adjourn the meeting in memory of Nick Latimer, a West Anaheim community leader. He noted that he served as an elder at Prince of Peace Lutheran Church, a captain in the U.S. Army serving in Vietnam, and a well-known realtor in Anaheim.
Council Member Rubalcava shared that she represents approximately 50,000 residents in District 3, where she was born and raised. She highlighted attending AltaMed’s Comida y Vino event, which raised funds for health services for women and children. She noted that AltaMed is located in District 3 and offers many services to Latinos in the Anaheim community. She highlighted the attendance of Mayor Pro Tem Leon and local businesses, including En Familia. She thanked AltaMed for their continued service to the community, noting that they are the only provider of low-income pediatric dental services in the area. Council Member Rubalcava shared her attendance at Anaheim High School’s Back-to-School night. She commended the students, parents, and school clubs for their efforts to support a successful school year. She emphasized the City’s interest in supporting local students and families through resources, traffic control, and public safety, and thanked Anaheim schools for educating future generations. Council Member Rubalcava announced that she served as the emcee for the Anaheim Alumni Association’s Anaheim High School Hall of Fame ceremony, honoring more than 60 alumni from various fields, including business, media, government, and athletics. She highlighted inductees Congressman Lou Correa and Charles ‘Chic’ Burlingame III, an Anaheim High School alumnus and pilot who died during the 9/11 attacks. She thanked the Anaheim Alumni Association for its continued efforts to honor alumni and their connection to the Anaheim community. Council Member Rubalcava highlighted a 9/11 remembrance event hosted by Anaheim High School’s Navy Junior Reserve Officers Training Corps (NJROTC) students, noting the importance of educating students who were not yet born at the time of the attacks. She stated that the event brought together students, Anaheim Police and Fire personnel, the Fire Chief, and Congressman Lou Correa, to honor those who lost their lives and recognize the sacrifices of first responders during and after 9/11. Council Member Rubalcava recognized Anaheim youth boxers Guadalupe Ruiz and Diego Aviles for their accomplishments in boxing and asked the community and local businesses to help raise approximately $6,000 to support their upcoming competitions. She shared that Guadalupe Ruiz, who trains at Punch Out Boxing in Anaheim, was recognized as the No. 1 USA boxer in her age group, a 2025 national champion, a member of Team USA, and a gold medalist. She stated that Diego Aviles, also a local boxer, was recognized for his boxing City Council Minutes of September 22, 2026
accomplishments and upcoming opportunity to represent Anaheim and the United States in competition. She reported that her office is supporting the fundraiser and planned to share information on social media. She emphasized the importance of providing Anaheim youth with positive outlets and healthy activities that can help them avoid negative influences and pursue productive opportunities. Council Member Rubalcava highlighted a mental health and wellness event held in collaboration with Council Member Maahs during Suicide Awareness Month. She noted that the initiative focused on increasing awareness and connecting Anaheim residents with mental health resources, with particular attention to the Latino community. She shared that participating organizations included the Anaheim Police Department, first responders, CHOC (Children’s Hospital of Orange County), the Orange County Health Care Agency, and Council Member Maahs’ office. She reported that her team also developed a mental health and wellness resource guide for residents.
She emphasized the importance of continuing to address suicide prevention and mental health needs among youth and residents throughout Anaheim and thanked everyone who participated. Council Member Rubalcava recognized a suicide-prevention mural being painted in memory of Mia Mejia, a District 2 resident. She noted that the mural is being painted by Carla Roque, in partnership with Mia’s family, Community Services, and Council Members. She shared that the mural will honor Mia’s memory while raising awareness of suicide prevention and supporting youth. She announced that the mural would be unveiled at Clara Barton Park on September 25th from 4 p.m. to 5 p.m., with Mia’s family in attendance, and encouraged the community to attend. Council Member Rubalcava requested to adjourn the meeting in memory of Sandra Vasquez. She shared that Sandra Vasquez, a lifelong Anaheim resident, passed away on August 25th, following a five-year battle with cancer. She stated that Sandra was a Disneyland cast member for 46 years and was affectionately known as “Miss Small World.” She noted that Sandra was recognized for mentoring fellow cast members, helping families create memorable experiences, and guiding young people beginning their careers at Disneyland. She shared that Sandra is survived by four children and two grandchildren and will be remembered for her contributions to the Anaheim community, her warmth, and her beloved rose garden.
Mayor Pro Tem Leon congratulated the Anaheim High School Marching Band for being selected to perform at the 2028 Tournament of Roses Parade. He noted that it was the first time in the school’s 130-year history that the school would participate in the iconic New Year’s Day tradition, and the fourth band to march in the Rose Parade, following Katella, Magnolia, and Cypress High School. He congratulated all of the students at Anaheim High School, the Band Director Breysi Garcia and the Associate Band Director Julie Enciso, and commended them for their work. Mayor Pro Tem Leon requested to adjourn the meeting in memory of District 2 resident and valued member of the Anaheim community, Felix E. Figueroa. He shared that Felix called Anaheim his home since 2010 and passed away on September 8, 2026, and was survived by his wife and father. He stated that Felix enjoyed attending various City events, including the annual NAMM show, which he never missed since moving to Anaheim. Mayor Pro Tem Leon also requested to adjourn the meeting in memory of Joseph Nguyen. He shared that Joseph immigrated to the United States from Vietnam, and Anaheim was his home for many years. He added that he had the opportunity to know Joseph’s sons and experience firsthand the meaningful work that the family did in the community. He expressed his deepest condolences to the family.
Mayor Aitken thanked City staff, the Police and Fire Departments, and fellow Council Members for their participation in the City’s event remembering 9/11 on its 25th Anniversary. She emphasized the importance of honoring and remembering those who lost their lives on September 11 and the thousands of first responders and others who continued serving at the site in the aftermath. She expressed hope that the remembrance event can grow into a larger and lasting Anaheim tradition.
Mayor Aitken thanked members of the nonprofit and religious communities for participating in the first Prayer Breakfast held during her term, noting that the event was intended to revive a special community tradition. She expressed appreciation for keynote speaker Sister Johnellen Turner, former City Council Minutes of September 22, 2026
head of St. Catherine’s Academy, and Chaplain Nathan Zug, Bobby McDonald, Erika Nguyen, and everyone who participated in the successful event. Mayor Aitken highlighted Disneyland’s event in District 3. She thanked City staff and Disneyland for bringing a family-focused event to Center Greens Park. She shared that families connected to the Family Resource Center were able to enjoy Disneyland-themed activities, including character experiences, performances, churros, and Mickey ice cream bars. She expressed appreciation for the event and the opportunity to provide local children and families with access to those experiences. Mayor Aitken thanked the United States Conference on HIV and AIDS for inviting her to its 45th conference. She highlighted the 45th Anniversary of the CDC’s (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) recognition of HIV/AIDS as an epidemic and noted the significant advances made in medicine, education, prevention, and community support. She emphasized the continued disproportionate impact on certain communities and the importance of ongoing education and prevention efforts, with the goal of eventually eliminating HIV/AIDS. Mayor Aitken stated that while there were limits to what she could discuss, she asked the community to consider her record, initiatives she has championed, communities she has supported, statements made, and the values demonstrated through her actions. She announced that she would participate in any matter openly and truthfully. She repeated her comments in Spanish.
CITY MANAGER’S UPDATE:
Interim City Manager Garcia provided a general update on the ongoing Stadium assessment. He reported that the structural consultant was performing the final engineering analysis and assessment of the Stadium test results, which are pending. He stated that the final assessment was expected to be completed later in the year. He noted no additional developments and that updates would continue to be provided. Interim City Manager Garcia invited the community to Anaheim Public Library’s festivities to celebrate Hispanic Heritage Month from September 15th to October 15th. He stated that events include special story times, cooking demonstrations, crafts, movies, games, and more. He encouraged the public to visit the City’s website for more details. Interim City Manager Garcia announced that the Anaheim Public Utilities Sustainability Education Center earned the top honor of first place in the Large Utility Category from the California Municipal Utilities Association’s 2026 Annual Impact Awards. He noted that the Impact Awards recognize outstanding projects and programs that advance best practices, innovation, and excellence in California’s water and power industries. He reported that, funded in part through a congressional earmark and an American Public Power Association grant, the Sustainability Center offers free field trips to students across all of Anaheim school districts. Interim City Manager Garcia announced that the City of Anaheim received an Innovation Award from the National MS for recognition for stormwater excellence. He noted that the award recognizes Anaheim for developing one of the nation’s most innovative stormwater funding mechanisms through the Stormwater Credit Trading Program. He explained that the program was designed to improve water quality, reduce flooding, enhance groundwater recharge, and provide sustainable funding for future stormwater infrastructure investments. He shared that the program was a great example of the Public Works Department finding innovative ways to address infrastructure and environmental needs while bringing new resources to Anaheim. He congratulated Director of Public Works Rudy Emami and the entire Public Works team for the national recognition.
At 7:27 p.m., Mayor Aitken recessed the Anaheim City Council to address the Housing and Public Improvements Authority, and reconvened at 7:28 p.m., in joint session with the Anaheim Housing and Public Improvements Authority Business Calendar Item No. 2.
HOUSING AND PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AUTHORITY (in joint session with the City Council)
BUSINESS CALENDAR
City Council Minutes of September 22, 2026
2. Consider two resolutions of the Anaheim Housing and Public Improvements Authority (AHPIA) and two resolutions of the City Council, separately, authorizing and approving the issuance of Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2026-A (Electric Utility Distribution System Refunding) and Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2026-B (Electric Utility Distribution System Refunding) (Forward Delivery), in the aggregate principal amount not to exceed $325,000,000 and the issuance of Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2026-A (Water System Refunding) and Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2026-B (Water System Refunding) (Forward Delivery), in the aggregate principal amount not to exceed $225,000,000, by the AHPIA, and related actions.
Housing and Public Improvements Authority Action:
2-A. RESOLUTION NO. AHPIA-2026-003 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS OF THE ANAHEIM HOUSING AND PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AUTHORITY, (I) authorizing the issuance of not to exceed $325,000,000 aggregate principal amount of Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2026-A (Electric Utility Distribution System Refunding) and Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2026-B (Electric Utility Distribution System Refunding) (Forward Delivery) by said authority; (II) approving the refunding, defeasance, and purchase through tender offer of outstanding bonds; (III) approving the forms and authorizing the execution of an Indenture of Trust, an Installment Purchase Agreement, a Purchase Contract, a Forward Bond Purchase Contract, a Dealer Manager Agreement, an Invitation to Tender and other related documents; (IV) approving the execution and delivery of an Official Statement; and (V) approving certain actions in connection therewith.
RESOLUTION NO. AHPIA-2026-004 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS OF THE ANAHEIM HOUSING AND PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AUTHORITY, (I) authorizing the issuance of not to exceed $225,000,000 aggregate principal amount of Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2026-A (Water System Refunding) and Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2026-B (Water System Refunding) (Forward Delivery) by said authority; (II) approving the refunding, defeasance, and purchase through tender offer of outstanding bonds; (III) approving the forms and authorizing the execution of an Indenture of Trust, an Installment Purchase Agreement, a Purchase Contract, a Forward Bond Purchase Contract, a Dealer Manager Agreement, an Invitation to Tender and other related documents; (IV) approving the execution and delivery of an Official Statement; and (V) approving certain actions in connection therewith.
City Council Minutes of September 22, 2026
City Council Action:
2-B. RESOLUTION NO. 2026-108 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM (I) approving the issuance of not to exceed $325,000,000 aggregate principal amount of Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2026-A (Electric Utility Distribution System Refunding) and Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2026-B (Electric Utility Distribution System Refunding) (Forward Delivery) of the Anaheim Housing and Public Improvements Authority; (II) approving the refunding, defeasance, and purchase through tender offer of outstanding bonds; (III) approving the forms and authorizing the execution of an Installment Purchase Agreement, an Indenture of Trust, one or more Escrow Agreements, a Continuing Disclosure Agreement, a Purchase Contract, a Forward Bond Purchase Contract, a Dealer Manager Agreement, an Invitation to Tender and other related documents; (IV) approving the delivery of an Official Statement; and (V) approving certain actions in connection therewith.
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-109 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM (I) approving the issuance of not to exceed $225,000,000 aggregate principal amount of Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2026-A (Water System Refunding) and Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2026-B (Water System Refunding) (Forward Delivery) of the Anaheim Housing and Public Improvements Authority; (II) approving the refunding, defeasance, and purchase through tender offer of outstanding bonds; (III) approving the forms and authorizing the execution of an Installment Purchase Agreement, an Indenture of Trust, one or more Escrow Agreements, a Continuing Disclosure Agreement, a Purchase Contract, a Forward Bond Purchase Contract, a Dealer Manager Agreement, an Invitation to Tender and other related documents; (IV) approving the delivery of an Official Statement; and (V) approving certain actions in connection therewith.
Acting Public Utilities General Manager Brian Beelner reported the item was to authorize the refinancing of a portion of Anaheim Public Utilities’ outstanding electric and water revenue bonds to reduce future interest costs and generate savings for utility customers. He explained that Anaheim Public Utilities uses municipal tax-exempt debt as a lower-cost financing mechanism for major infrastructure projects, including substations, distribution equipment, water mains, reservoirs, and new wells. He noted that prudent use of the bond market contributes to Anaheim’s residential electric bills remaining approximately half the cost of those charged by neighboring utilities. He reported that when the Public Utilities Board recommended the transaction the prior month, the estimated savings from refinancing the targeted electric bonds were approximately $15 million. He stated that due to significant changes in the bond market, including an increase in the federal funds rate and higher Treasury yields resulting from geopolitical developments, had substantially reduced the projected savings. He explained that the savings show in the original presentation had been reduced by approximately half. He noted that based on current market conditions, if the transaction were priced that evening, staff would not recommend proceeding.
Acting Public Utilities General Manager Beelner reported that recommended authorizing the refinancing now so the City would be prepared to act if market conditions improve. He emphasized that the authorization would not commit the City to refinancing, increase the City’s debt, or increase customer rates. He added that it would provide flexibility to refinance eligible outstanding bonds when market conditions support meaningful savings. He stated that the target would generally be at least 3% savings, noting that the savings available in August were significantly greater than that threshold.
City Council Minutes of September 22, 2026
Acting Public Utilities General Manager Beelner stated that for the water bonds, the original estimate was approximately $4.1 million in interest savings, but that estimate had also declined as market conditions changed. He reported that the same approach would apply to the water bonds: no transaction would occur unless the market produced sufficient savings. He explained that the costs associated with issuing the refinancing bonds—including attorney, financial advisor, and underwriting fees—would be contingent on the transaction actually being completed. He noted that if market conditions did not support refinancing, the City would simply not proceed and would not incur those transaction costs.
Acting Public Utilities General Manager Brian Beelner concluded that the requested authorization was intended to give the City the flexibility to respond quickly to changes in the bond market without requiring it to complete a transaction under unfavorable conditions. He noted that the refinancing would only move forward if it resulted in meaningful savings for utility customers.
DISCUSSION: Authority Member/Council Member Balius expressed support for the proposed refinancing and the goal of saving money. He requested clarification on whether the requested authorization would remain in effect for an unspecified period or whether staff was seeking authorization for a specific timeframe, such as 30, 60, or 90 days. He inquired what benchmark or market conditions would need to be reached for the City to return to the approximately $15 million in projected savings identified in the original estimate.
Acting Public Utilities General Manager Beelner explained that the City’s policy is not to refund bonds unless the refinancing generates at least 3% aggregate savings. He provided an example of 164 million in bonds, staff estimated that a 3% savings level would produce approximately $5.8 million in savings. He clarified that the savings threshold is evaluated across the bond transaction as a whole and is intended to cover the costs of executing the refinancing while also providing sufficient savings to justify the transaction, particularly because the bonds cannot be called or refinanced again for five years. He noted that waiting for more favorable market conditions can sometimes produce greater savings, particularly if the yield curve declines, since shorter-term bonds generally carry lower interest rates. He explained that regarding the authorization period, the proposed resolution does not establish a specific expiration date and would technically allow the transaction to be executed at any time with the City’s and bond counsels. He stated that, as a matter of good governance, staff would not allow the authorization to remain in place for more than approximately six months without returning to the City Council for reauthorization. He stated that because the City’s bond disclosure document can become outdated as financial, regulatory, market, and other information changes. He explained that after approximately six months, the City Council and Public Utilities Board should have an opportunity to review and approve updated disclosure information rather than allowing the authorization to remain “evergreen.”
In response to Authority Member/Council Member Balius, Acting Public Utilities General Manager Beelner clarified there were two sets of bonds for electric and water.
Authority Member/Council Member Balius expressed support for saving money and suggested that the six-month authorization period may be longer than necessary. He requested that the resolution authorize staff to proceed with the bond refinancing for up to six months, provided market conditions are favorable.
Acting Public Utilities General Manager Beelner recommended amending Section 8 of the resolution to address staff’s authority to update or amend the disclosure, subject to Council’s approval.
City Council Minutes of September 22, 2026
In response to Authority Member/Council Member Balius, Acting Public Utilities General Manager Beelner clarified that the 3% savings threshold is the minimum floor for proceeding with the refinancing. He noted that based on approximately $252 million in standalone bonds, the minimum savings would be about $7.5 million; because the electric and water bonds are being considered together, totaling approximately $430 million, the combined minimum savings threshold would be approximately $12.9 million to $13 million.
Vice-Chairperson/Mayor Pro Tem Leon requested clarification on the amendment.
Acting Public Utilities General Manager Beelner clarified that if the refinancing transaction is not executed within six months of the meeting, staff would be required to return to the City Council for reauthorization.
Housing and Public Improvements Authority Action:
MOTION: Authority Member Kurtz moved to approve RESOLUTION NO. AHPIA-2026-003 A
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE ANAHEIM HOUSING AND PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AUTHORITY, (I) authorizing the issuance of not to exceed $325,000,000 aggregate principal amount of Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2026-A (Electric Utility Distribution System Refunding) and Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2026-B (Electric Utility Distribution System Refunding) (Forward Delivery) by said authority; (II) approving the refunding, defeasance, and purchase through tender offer of outstanding bonds; (III) approving the forms and authorizing the execution of an Indenture of Trust, an Installment Purchase Agreement, a Purchase Contract, a Forward Bond Purchase Contract, a Dealer Manager Agreement, an Invitation to Tender and other related documents; (IV) approving the execution and delivery of an Official Statement; and (V) approving certain actions in connection therewith [as amended to proceed with the bond refinancing for up to six months, provided market conditions are favorable] and RESOLUTION NO.
AHPIA-2026-004 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE ANAHEIM HOUSING AND PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AUTHORITY, (I) authorizing the issuance of not to exceed $225,000,000 aggregate principal amount of Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2026-A (Water System Refunding) and Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2026-B (Water System Refunding) (Forward Delivery) by said authority; (II) approving the refunding, defeasance, and purchase through tender offer of outstanding bonds; (III) approving the forms and authorizing the execution of an Indenture of Trust, an Installment Purchase Agreement, a Purchase Contract, a Forward Bond Purchase Contract, a Dealer Manager Agreement, an Invitation to Tender and other related documents; (IV) approving the execution and delivery of an Official Statement; and (V) approving certain actions in connection therewith [as amended to proceed with the bond refinancing for up to six months, provided market conditions are favorable], seconded by Authority Member Meeks. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES – 7 (Chairperson Aitken and Authority Members Leon, Balius, Rubalcava, Kurtz, Maahs, and Meeks); NOES – 0. Motion carried.
City Council Action:
MOTION: Council Member Balius moved to approve RESOLUTION NO. 2026-108 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM (I) approving the issuance of not to exceed $325,000,000 aggregate principal amount of Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2026- A (Electric Utility Distribution System Refunding) and Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2026-B (Electric Utility Distribution System Refunding) (Forward Delivery) of the Anaheim Housing and Public Improvements Authority; (II) approving the refunding, defeasance, and purchase through tender offer of outstanding bonds; (III) approving the forms and authorizing the execution of an Installment Purchase Agreement, an Indenture of Trust, one or more Escrow Agreements, a Continuing Disclosure Agreement, a Purchase Contract, a Forward Bond Purchase Contract, a Dealer Manager City Council Minutes of September 22, 2026
Agreement, an Invitation to Tender and other related documents; (IV) approving the delivery of an Official Statement; and (V) approving certain actions in connection therewith [as amended to proceed with the bond refinancing for up to six months, provided market conditions are favorable] and RESOLUTION NO. 2026-109 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM (I) approving the issuance of not to exceed $225,000,000 aggregate principal amount of Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2026-A (Water System Refunding) and Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2026-B (Water System Refunding) (Forward Delivery) of the Anaheim Housing and Public Improvements Authority; (II) approving the refunding, defeasance, and purchase through tender offer of outstanding bonds; (III) approving the forms and authorizing the execution of an Installment Purchase Agreement, an Indenture of Trust, one or more Escrow Agreements, a Continuing Disclosure Agreement, a Purchase Contract, a Forward Bond Purchase Contract, a Dealer Manager Agreement, an Invitation to Tender and other related documents; (IV) approving the delivery of an Official Statement; and (V) approving certain actions in connection therewith [as amended to proceed with the bond refinancing for up to six months, provided market conditions are favorable], seconded by Council Member Meeks. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES – 7 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Leon, Balius, Rubalcava, Kurtz, Maahs, and Meeks); NOES -0. Motion carried.
At 7:40 p.m., Mayor Aitken adjourned the Anaheim Housing and Public Improvements Authority.
CONSENT CALENDAR: At 7:40 p.m., the Consent Calendar was considered with Council Member Meeks pulling Item No. 11 and Council Member Balius pulling Item Nos. 9 and 10 for separate consideration.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Leon moved to waive reading of the resolutions and adopt the balance of the consent calendar as presented, in accordance with reports, certifications, and recommendations furnished each City Council Member, seconded by Council Member Kurtz. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES – 7 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Leon, Balius, Rubalcava, Kurtz, Maahs, and Meeks); NOES – 0. Motion carried.
3. Receive and file minutes of the Cultural and Heritage Commission meeting of July 16, 2026, the Parks and Recreation Commission meeting of July 22, 2026, the Public Utilities Board meeting of July 22, 2026, and the Sister City Commission meeting of May 26, 2026.
4. Appoint two new members to the Anaheim Workforce Development Board with terms ending June 30, 2030 (Sonta Garner-Marcelo and Cindy Marquez, representing labor).
5. Ratify certificates recognizing Andy Nogal for his retirement as City of Anaheim’s Housing and Community Development Deputy Director and Marco Lucero for his retirement as City of Anaheim’s Housing and Community Development’s Workforce Development Manager; and approve a certificate recognizing the 50th Anniversary of the Sister City relationship between the City of Anaheim and Mito, Japan.
6. Approve the Fiscal Year 2025/2026 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER), in substantial form, authorize de minimis changes to the CAPER as determined by the Director of Housing and Community Development, and direct staff to submit the CAPER to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
City Council Minutes of September 22, 2026
7. Receive and file the Fair Political Practices Commission 2026 Local Agency Biennial Notice advising that the City’s Conflict of Interest Code is currently under review.
8. Authorize the Chief of Police, or designee, to accept a donation, in the amount of $100,000, from the Anaheim Police Department Foundation, a non-profit 501(c)(3) tax organization, for the purchase of equine stables and care equipment, associated parts, services and warranty for the Police Department’s Mounted Enforcement Unit; and increase the Police Department’s Fiscal Year 2026/27 General Fund Expense Budget by $100,000.
12. RESOLUTION NO. 2026-110 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM amending Resolution No. 2026-104 for the purpose of creating, deleting and/or modifying certain classifications, rates of compensation, and pay policies for classifications designated as Non-Represented Full-Time and Part-Time Employees.
Increase the Fiscal Year 2026/27 General Fund budget by $325,000.
13. RESOLUTION NO. 2026-111 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM adopting a Memorandum of Understanding establishing terms and conditions of employment for employees represented by the Anaheim Municipal Employees Association, Police Cadets, and repealing Resolution No. 2024-078 [effective June 19, 2026 through June 15, 2028].
14. RESOLUTION NO. 2026-112 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM adopting a Memorandum of Understanding establishing terms and conditions of employment for employees represented by the Service Employees’ International Union, United Service Workers West [effective December 20, 2025 through December 19, 2028].
15. RESOLUTION NO. 2026-113 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ratifying the submission of grant applications and the acceptance of grants on behalf of the City of Anaheim for the Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP) grant, Child Passenger Safety Program grant, and Motorcyclist Safety Education and Training Program grant, and authorizing the Chief of Police, or his designee, to execute all required grant documents and amending the budget accordingly [STEP - $487,000, Child Passenger Safety Program - $80,000, and Motorcyclist Safety Education and Training Program - $52,000].
16. Approve minutes of the City Council meetings of July 14, 2026, July 28, 2026, and August 11, 2026.
City Council Minutes of September 22, 2026
BUSINESS CALENDAR:
9. Award Master Agreement Purchase Order No. 106-499266 to W.W. Grainger, Inc. for the purchase of Maintenance, Repair, And Operation Supplies Parts, Equipment and Materials for Citywide use, for a one year term in an amount not to exceed $650,000, with two one-year optional renewals (annual contract amount for renewals will be based on prior year usage, subject to available budget appropriations); and authorize the Purchasing Agent, or designee, to execute the Master Agreement and exercise the renewal options in accordance with the terms of Omnia Partners Cooperative Contract No. 2018.000207.
DISCUSSION: Council Member Balius asked whether the purchase involves commonly used items needed by the City and whether that is the intended purpose of the procurement.
Purchasing Agent Ed Segura explained that the purchases consist of various categories of supplies provided by Granger, including adhesives, air filters, batteries, electrical supplies, and other miscellaneous materials.
In response to Council Member Balius, Purchasing Agent Segura clarified that the agreement has not expired, but the amendments were not attached to the item. He added that the agreement included six amendments and was extended until 2028.
Council Member Balius questioned whether, given the age of the contract, this would be an appropriate time to evaluate alternative vendors and determine whether the City could obtain the items at lower prices, better discounts, or more favorable terms, while acknowledging the potential additional workload for staff.
Purchasing Agent Segura explained that the contract has evolved over time, including an increase in the available discount. He noted, however, the agreement does not require the City to exclusively use Grainger, allowing staff to purchase from other vendors as needed. He added that the City also has access to other cooperative purchasing agreements with additional vendors.
Council Member Balius questioned whether the City should consider contracting with other vendors if they can provide the same materials at lower prices than the discounted rates offered by Grainger.
Purchasing Agent Segura explained that the City could consider other vendors, but the level of spending at the time did not justify pursuing an alternative contract.
Council Member Balius clarified that he initially believed the contract had expired but acknowledged staff’s explanation for the renewals.
MOTION: Council Member Balius moved to award Master Agreement Purchase Order No. 106- 499266 to W.W. Grainger, Inc. for the purchase of Maintenance, Repair, And Operation Supplies Parts, Equipment and Materials for Citywide use, for a one year term in an amount not to exceed $650,000, with two one-year optional renewals (annual contract amount for renewals will be based on prior year usage, subject to available budget appropriations); and authorize the Purchasing Agent, or designee, to execute the Master Agreement and exercise the renewal options in accordance with the terms of Omnia Partners Cooperative Contract No. 2018.000207, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Leon.
DISCUSSION: Council Member Rubalcava requested that, going forward, Council receive a copy of contracts before they expire when an agreement is being extended or renewed. She also suggested City Council Minutes of September 22, 2026
that, when appropriate, the City explore issuing an RFP or otherwise evaluating alternative options to ensure Council is aware of potential opportunities before the contract is renewed.
Director of Public Works Rudy Emami explained that, unlike a traditional RFP seeking competitive pricing from multiple vendors, the contract utilizes a national cooperative purchasing agreement originally established with the UC system. He noted that the cooperative allows participating government agencies to access negotiated discounts based on the vendor’s economies of scale, without requiring the City to purchase exclusively from Granger. He added that crews may use other vendors when needed, but participation in the cooperative allows the City to receive discounts from Grainger ranging from approximately 5% to 30%, depending on the product category, rather than paying list prices.
Council Member Rubalcava acknowledged that the contract represents an “up to” amount and recalled a similar procurement item previously brought forward for Anaheim Police Department that the Council chose not to pursue. She suggested that, despite the cooperative purchasing discounts, Council should receive additional details regarding the pricing and potential alternatives before proceeding.
MOTION: Council Member Balius moved to award Master Agreement Purchase Order No. 106- 499266 to W.W. Grainger, Inc. for the purchase of Maintenance, Repair, And Operation Supplies Parts, Equipment and Materials for Citywide use, for a one year term in an amount not to exceed $650,000, with two one-year optional renewals (annual contract amount for renewals will be based on prior year usage, subject to available budget appropriations); and authorize the Purchasing Agent, or designee, to execute the Master Agreement and exercise the renewal options in accordance with the terms of Omnia Partners Cooperative Contract No. 2018.000207, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Leon.
ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Leon, Balius, Rubalcava, Kurtz, Maahs, and Meeks); NOES – 0. Motion carried..
10. Approve a Software License and Services Agreement with iVoyant LLC for systems integration software licenses, implementation services, and support services for an initial five year term with two five-year optional extensions, in an amount not to exceed $1,080,000 for the initial term, and an annual support-services cost of $60,000 with a Consumer Price Index (CPI) escalator capped at 3% for each extension term year, plus a contingency for as-needed additional services not to exceed $100,000 per year (with unused balances carrying forward a maximum of one year); and authorize the Acting Public Utilities General Manager, or designee, to execute the agreement with any changes deemed nonmaterial by the City Attorney’s Office, and any related or implementing documents, including cost-neutral amendments, assignments, and documents contemplated by the agreement, and to take such necessary or advisable actions to implement, fund, and administer the agreement.
DISCUSSION: Council Member Balius asked whether the utility system upgrade included any improvements to the payment system, particularly whether the City had considered adding Google Pay or Apple Pay options, noting that community members have requested these payment methods.
Acting Public Utilities General Manager Beelner explained that Google Pay and Apple Pay can be used at cashiering office swipe stations for in-person transactions. He added that those payment methods are not currently compatible with the City’s cashiering system and deferred to the Treasurer regarding any planned updates to support those payment options.
In response to Council Member Balius, Acting Public Utilities General Manager Beelner confirmed that customers are unable to use Google and Apple Pay online.
City Council Minutes of September 22, 2026
Council Member Balius questioned why Google Pay and Apple Pay could be accepted at in-person cashiering stations but not through the City’s online payment system, suggesting that enabling those payment options online should be relatively straightforward.
Assistant General Manager - Administration & Risk Services Jon Sanks clarified that at the front counter at City Hall, customers can use tap to pay credit cards, which are compatible with phones. He explained that the web application differs from the tap to pay function.
In response to Council Member Balius, Assistant General Manager Sanks explained that the City’s current payment vendor for citywide credit card transactions is not compatible with Google Pay or Apple Pay. He stated that Finance could explore adding these payment options, but doing so would likely require engaging an additional payment-processing vendor that supports them.
Council Member Balius noted that several residents have expressed interest in being able to make payments using Apple Pay and Google Pay and left the matter for further consideration.
MOTION: Council Member Balius moved to approve a Software License and Services Agreement with iVoyant LLC for systems integration software licenses, implementation services, and support services for an initial five year term with two five-year optional extensions, in an amount not to exceed $1,080,000 for the initial term, and an annual support-services cost of $60,000 with a Consumer Price Index (CPI) escalator capped at 3% for each extension term year, plus a contingency for as-needed additional services not to exceed $100,000 per year (with unused balances carrying forward a maximum of one year); and authorize the Acting Public Utilities General Manager, or designee, to execute the agreement with any changes deemed nonmaterial by the City Attorney’s Office, and any related or implementing documents, including cost-neutral amendments, assignments, and documents contemplated by the agreement, and to take such necessary or advisable actions to implement, fund, and administer the agreement, seconded by Council Member Meeks. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES – 7 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Leon, Balius, Rubalcava, Kurtz, Maahs, and Meeks); NOES – 0. Motion carried.
11. Approve the 2027 Health and Welfare Plan Rates and approve an agreement, in substantial form, with Standard Insurance Company for administration of life, disability, and leave insurance and services for a three year period effective January 1, 2027, authorize the Human Resources Director to make de minimis revisions to the related agreements, as approved by the City Attorney’s Office, and to enter and execute all required agreements necessary to implement and administer the approved programs and services.
DISCUSSION: Council Member Meeks shared her support for the proposed rates but requested that staff review the City’s dental insurance offerings before the item returns next year. She expressed concern that current dental plans provide limited coverage beyond routine cleanings and X-rays and may not adequately cover newer or more common treatments, such as Invisalign and dental implants.
She asked staff to research market trends and potential dental plan options that could provide improved benefits for City employees.
Director of Human Resources Linda Andal agreed to review the dental insurance offerings and noted that the City last issued an RFP for a dental plan in 2024, making the City due for another RFP by next year.
Council Member Meeks expressed concern that dental insurance options for employees may be limited compared with other types of coverage and thanked staff for agreeing to review available offerings before the next RFP.
City Council Minutes of September 22, 2026
Council Member Balius asked staff to explain the significant differences in monthly rates among the medical plans, specifically noting the Blue Shield Full PPO Plus Family plan at $7,331 per month and the Kaiser HMO Colorado plan at $5,815 per month, and questioning what factors contribute to their higher costs compared with the other plans.
Director Andal explained that the PPO plans experienced an overall 9.6% rate increase, primarily due to the City’s utilization of the plans. She stated that the increase reflects the volume and cost of claims, which are evaluated annually and contribute to the City’s overall plan costs. She added that the costs for prescriptions are increasing as well.
In response to Council Member Balius, Director Andal confirmed that all listed plans are available to active employees. She clarified that the referenced attachment pertains to pre-65 retiree plans and noted that the City offers both pre-65 and post-65 retiree medical plans.
Council Member Rubalcava raised concerns regarding part-time employees losing benefits when they do not meet the 30-hour threshold. She suggested the City conduct a Citywide review of the policy and identify ways to provide greater benefits stability for part-time employees, noting the financial pressures facing employees. She further expressed that the issue should be addressed as a Citywide policy rather than negotiated separately through labor unions.
Interim City Manager Garcia agreed to study the issue and provide Council with additional information before further discussion.
MOTION: Council Member Balius moved to approve the 2027 Health and Welfare Plan Rates and approve an agreement, in substantial form, with Standard Insurance Company for administration of life, disability, and leave insurance and services for a three year period effective January 1, 2027, authorize the Human Resources Director to make de minimis revisions to the related agreements, as approved by the City Attorney’s Office, and to enter and execute all required agreements necessary to implement and administer the approved programs and services, seconded by Council Member Meeks. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES – 7 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Leon, Balius, Rubalcava, Kurtz, Maahs, and Meeks); NOES – 0. Motion carried.
17. Receive an update regarding the City Attorney's Office's implementation of a Tenant Protection Act information intake program for Anaheim renters [informational item only].
Council Member Rubalcava thanked the City Attorney, Housing and Community Development Department, and Communications team for their work in developing the City’s Tenant Protection Initiative. She noted that the initiative had been discussed approximately two years ago with the goal of implementing and enforcing existing state tenant protection laws, emphasizing that policies require an enforcement mechanism to be effective. She acknowledged that the City may not be able to address every situation retroactively but viewed the initiative as a step forward. She also emphasized the importance of proactive communication to residents about available resources and assistance, with the goal of helping tenants access support and prevent evictions before they occur.
City Attorney Robert Fabela provided an update on the City’s new Tenant Protection Intake Information Pilot Program, which is expected to launch in October. He stated that the program was developed following Council Member Rubalcava’s request in February to examine the City’s potential role in enforcing the State’s rent control protections and addressing no-cause evictions. He reported that the City Attorney’s Office subsequently met with Council Member Rubalcava and the Housing City Council Minutes of September 22, 2026
and Community Development Department, and the proposed pilot program was developed as a result of those discussions. He explained that the initial program is primarily an administrative effort intended to collect information and data, while also creating an opportunity for potential future City involvement in tenant protection matters.
City Attorney Fabela reported that the program will operate under the California Tenant Protection Act, which, for covered rental properties, generally limits certain rent increases and provides justcause protections against certain evictions or terminations of tenancy. He emphasized that the law does not apply to every rental property or situation and includes various exemptions and requirements that depend on the specific tenancy. Senate Bill 567, enacted within the last several years, strengthened the Tenant Protection Act and expressly authorized city attorneys and other public attorneys to pursue civil enforcement of its protections. He stated that beginning with the pilot program, the City Attorney’s Office intends to use that authority to better understand the frequency and nature of potential violations occurring in Anaheim and determine whether there are patterns involving particular landlords or property managers.
City Attorney Fabela identified two primary objectives for the intake process. He explained that first, the City will collect information because it currently lacks comprehensive data regarding how frequently potential violations occur, the types of issues tenants are experiencing, and whether repeated or ongoing conduct may be occurring. He added that second, the intake process will allow the City Attorney’s Office to identify matters where some level of City involvement may be appropriate. He explained that involvement could include requesting additional information from a landlord or property manager, contacting a landlord regarding an apparent violation and seeking voluntary compliance, or, in more significant circumstances involving repeated or ongoing violations, bringing a matter before the City Council for consideration of a civil enforcement action. He stated that submission of an inquiry, however, would not automatically mean that a violation occurred or that the City would take enforcement action.
City Attorney Fabela clarified the limitations of the program. He explained that the City Attorney’s Office will not become a general landlord-tenant legal services office or act as an attorney for individual tenants. He noted that the pilot will focus on the two areas for which State law specifically provides City Attorney enforcement authority: limitations on rent increases and just-cause eviction protections. He reported that the program will not generally address landlord-tenant disputes involving repairs, security deposits, discrimination allegations, or other lease-related matters. He explained that inquiry will be reviewed to determine whether a potential violation exists and whether City involvement is appropriate, including consideration of available City resources. He stated that tenants will continue to have their own private legal rights and remedies, including potential civil remedies, and the City’s website will advise tenants to independently protect and pursue those rights rather than wait for the City to act.
City Attorney Fabela explained that regarding rent increases, for properties covered by the Act, the current maximum increase is generally 5% plus the applicable local area inflation rate, subject to the statutory cap. He stated that based on the current local CPI of 3.7%, the maximum increase was identified as 8.7% at the time of the presentation. In years when the applicable CPI exceeds 5%, the maximum increase could reach 10%. He noted that exemptions apply to certain types of rental housing, including newer housing—generally properties less than 15 years old—and certain singlefamily homes and condominiums. He reported that determining whether a particular property and tenancy are covered by the Act will therefore be part of the City Attorney’s review. He further clarified that the eviction protections the City Attorney’s Office is authorized to pursue under the program City Council Minutes of September 22, 2026
concern no-fault evictions. He stated that the program is not intended to involve the City in ordinary at-fault evictions, such as situations involving nonpayment of rent or alleged violations of a lease. He explained that the City Attorney’s Office will focus on potential violations of the California Tenant Protection Act’s just-cause requirements, particularly no-fault eviction situations, such as an asserted owner move-in or substantial remodel. He reported that in those circumstances, State law establishes specific requirements that landlords must meet, and the pilot will allow tenants to submit related notices and documentation to the City for review.
City Attorney Fabela explained that the program is being developed in coordination with the Housing and Community Development Department and the City Manager’s Office. He reported that the City Attorney’s Office is also developing a dedicated tenant protection webpage designed to explain the applicable protections in relatively simple language, provide information in multiple languages, identify important exemptions, and direct residents to the City’s intake process. He noted that the webpage is expected to launch in October on the City’s website. He stated that the proposed intake form will collect information needed for an initial screening of each matter, including the type of rental property, whether the issue concerns a rent increase or eviction, relevant dates and amounts, and the underlying notice or other supporting documentation. He explained that establishing a centralized intake process will allow the City to collect information consistently, identify trends or recurring issues, and determine whether individual matters warrant additional review or potential City involvement. He emphasized that submitting an intake form does not create an attorney-client relationship between the tenant and the City Attorney’s Office, does not guarantee that the City will take action, and does not relieve tenants of their responsibility to protect their own legal rights, including complying with applicable deadlines. He noted, however, depending on the circumstances, the City Attorney’s Office may determine that a matter warrants action on behalf of the City. He reported that the pilot will initially be administered using existing City Attorney’s Office resources. He added that staff would evaluate the information and experience gained through the pilot and return to the City Council with a report once sufficient data has been collected to assess the program’s effectiveness and determine whether additional steps or resources may be appropriate.
DISCUSSION: In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Chief Communications Officer Mike Lyster explained that residents who believe they are living in substandard housing conditions have an avenue for assistance through the City’s Code Enforcement process. He stated that residents are encouraged to report concerns regarding housing conditions to Code Enforcement, after which Code Enforcement and other appropriate City departments can investigate the circumstances and take action as warranted. He clarified that this process would be separate from the Tenant Protection Intake Information Pilot Program discussed during the meeting, but emphasized that residents should not believe they lack a City resource for addressing potentially substandard living conditions.
In response to Council Member Rubalcava, City Attorney Fabela confirmed that the City does not ask tenants to provide documentation of their immigration status and does not share the information collected through the program with outside agencies, including federal agencies.
Council Member Rubalcava emphasized the importance of clearly communicating the program’s privacy protections when the Tenant Protection Initiative is promoted to residents. She noted that residents may have concerns because other City programs, such as Contigo, require individuals to provide information, and stressed the need to reassure residents that information submitted through the tenant protection program is intended to assist them rather than cause harm. She stated that the City’s goal is to improve residents’ quality of life and their experiences with tenant protections in Anaheim.
Chief Communications Officer Lyster added that the Tenant Protection Initiative would operate similarly to the City’s Contigo program as a service for Anaheim residents. He emphasized that City Council Minutes of September 22, 2026
citizenship or immigration status would not be a factor in accessing the program or receiving assistance.
Council Member Meeks expressed support for the Tenant Protection Intake Information Pilot Program and emphasized the importance of evaluating the data collected to determine the scope and nature of tenant protection issues in Anaheim, including whether a small number of landlords or property managers are responsible for repeated violations. She asked staff to consider what enforcement measures may be appropriate if violations are identified, including whether monetary penalties could be imposed on landlords, whether landlords could be responsible for the City’s attorneys’ fees, and what other potential consequences or remedies may be available.
City Attorney Fabela explained that the City’s enforcement authority under the program is limited to seeking injunctive relief, meaning a court order requiring a landlord to comply with applicable tenant protection laws. He reported that while landlords may face potential monetary liability for violations, those financial remedies would be pursued through a tenant’s own private legal action rather than by the City. He reiterated that the City does not represent individual tenants, and any tenant seeking private remedies would be responsible for pursuing those rights independently.
Council Member Meeks suggested that the City consider advocating with State legislators for legislation establishing financial penalties or other monetary remedies for landlords who violate tenant protection laws. She expressed concern that, because the City’s enforcement authority is primarily limited to injunctive relief, tenants may have difficulty obtaining meaningful legal assistance or pursuing claims without potential financial consequences for landlords. She noted that monetary liability could provide greater incentive for attorneys to represent affected tenants and reduce the burden on the City to address individual cases. She supported moving forward with the pilot program to determine the extent of tenant protection issues in Anaheim and indicated that the City could evaluate appropriate enforcement or legislative options after reviewing the data collected.
In response to Council Member Kurtz, City Attorney Fabela explained that the intent of the intake process is to redirect tenants to the appropriate forum when the information received indicates that an issue falls outside the City’s authority or would be better addressed through another process. He expressed the goal of making those referrals promptly after assessing the information, so tenants can be directed to the appropriate resources or forum in a timely manner.
Council Member Kurtz requested that the Tenant Protection webpage and intake process be designed to be as simple, accessible, and easy to navigate as possible, recognizing that some residents may have difficulty navigating online systems, face language barriers, or lack access to a computer and may need to visit a library to submit a complaint. She emphasized the importance of making the information easy to read and the intake form straightforward to complete. She also recommended using the City’s community meetings scheduled for early October as an opportunity to introduce and promote the program, including announcing the new webpage and distributing information to residents once the website is operational.
Council Member Rubalcava expressed agreement with the comments regarding the Tenant Protection Initiative and supported the suggestion to engage State legislators regarding stronger financial penalties and additional support for tenant protections. She suggested having the City’s Government Affairs Department contact State legislators and prepare a letter in support of potential legislative changes. She noted that the legislative session was currently out of session and that a new group of policymakers would be serving when it reconvenes, and suggested advocating for funding to support implementation of the existing tenant protection policy. She also suggested pursuing State funding related to the City’s organic waste and trash-related challenges.
City Council Minutes of September 22, 2026
In response to Council Member Balius, City Attorney Fabela confirmed that the State law authorizes local government attorneys, including county counsel and city attorneys, as well as the Attorney General, to enforce the applicable state tenant protection provisions.
Council Member Balius inquired if any funds were provided to enforce the provisions.
City Attorney Fabela confirmed that no funds were provided. He explained that the program is intentionally being structured as an administrative pilot so the City can first determine the scope and nature of tenant protection issues in Anaheim. He noted that the information and data collected through the pilot will help inform future policy decisions, including whether additional City funding or resources are warranted, whether the City should pursue further policy direction, or whether State legislation should be sought to address identified issues.
Council Member Balius asked for clarification regarding the budget impact of the Tenant Protection Intake Information Pilot Program, noting that the staff report did not identify a specific financial impact.
He requested an estimate of the City Attorney’s Office staff hours spent developing the program to date, as well as the amount of staff time contributed by other participating City departments.
City Attorney Fabela estimated that approximately 10 to 15 staff hours had been spent on the pilot program to date, including meetings regarding the website, internal discussions, and related program development. He noted that the estimate was a rough approximation and was not able to provide a specific estimate for the hours contributed by other City staff.
Chief Communications Officer Lyster estimated that the Communications team spent approximately one work week on the Tenant Protection Initiative, including meetings with the City Attorney’s Office, conducting research, and preparing the webpage. He noted that this work was spread over a longer period and incorporated into the department’s normal workload by balancing the project with other ongoing responsibilities.
In response to Council Member Balius, City Attorney Fabela explained that the Tenant Protection Initiative does not require separate City Council authorization because the work falls within existing budgeted resources and the authority granted under State law. He provided an example of a tenant who reported to the Housing Department that they had received a deficient notice. He reported that staff reviewed the matter, determined that the tenant was already represented by an attorney who had prepared a letter regarding the issue, and concluded that no further City action was necessary.
He emphasized that the pilot provides an opportunity to address matters administratively, collect information, and report findings to the City Council before seeking any future policy direction, if warranted. He clarified that City Council policy guidance would only be needed if the program required additional expenditures. He noted that at this time, the City is not requesting or anticipating any additional funding for the program.
Council Member Rubalcava clarified that the tenant protection policy already exists and was originally requested as an agenda item in 2024. She noted that the current effort is not creating a new policy, but establishing an administrative process to implement and enforce the existing policy.
Council Member Balius stated that the policy was created by the State and not the City.
Council Member Rubalcava explained that the policy affects the City’s residents.
In response to Council Member Balius, Council Member Rubalcava stated that the item was discussed in 2024.
City Council Minutes of September 22, 2026
Mayor Pro Tem Leon thanked staff for their work and requested clarification regarding the information collected through the tenant protection intake process. He asked whether the intake form requests any personally identifiable information from residents or is limited to information about the nature of the issue and the circumstances being reported.
City Attorney Fabela explained that the intake form would request the resident’s name and contact information and allow them to submit relevant documents for review. He indicated that, aside from this information and the details concerning the reported issue, no additional personal information was expected to be requested.
Mayor Pro Tem Leon asked staff to clarify the process that would occur after a tenant submits an intake form. He inquired whether the City would investigate the complaint and potentially contact the landlord or property manager. He raised concerns about protecting tenants’ privacy and ensuring that the process does not inadvertently identify or expose a tenant to their landlord for reporting a potential violation.
City Attorney Fabela explained that the volume and applicability of submissions under the Tenant Protection Intake Program are not yet known, and that the California Tenant Protection Act is complex, with numerous exemptions and requirements. He provided an example of a rental property that is less than 15 years old may be exempt from the rent-increase restrictions, while an eviction notice may appear to comply with all applicable requirements and therefore not warrant further action.
In those cases, the City could document the matter as a data point to help identify trends. He stated that when a submission appears to identify a potentially deficient notice, such as an eviction notice missing statutorily required information, staff could contact the tenant or landlord, as appropriate, to gather additional information, determine whether there is an explanation or potential remedy, and assess whether further action is warranted. He cited a prior case in which a tenant was already represented by counsel, the eviction notice was rescinded, and no further City action was necessary.
He reported that any recommendation for civil enforcement would be brought to the City Council only when staff believed there was a clear violation of State law and potential broader significance, such as a repeat landlord or conduct affecting multiple tenants. He emphasized that the program is intended primarily for information gathering and identifying potential cases for future City Councilauthorized enforcement.
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Leon, City Attorney Fabela clarified that the City’s response to tenant submissions will be determined on a case-by-case basis and will remain at the City’s discretion. Staff may determine that no action is warranted and simply record the matter as a data point, and no specific outcome will be guaranteed to tenants. He noted that if the volume of submissions or level of involvement ultimately requires the City to address a significant number of cases, additional resources may be necessary. He explained that in that event, staff would return to the City Council with a request for additional resources; however, no additional resources are being requested at this time.
Mayor Pro Tem Leon emphasized that establishing trust with the community will be important to the success of the Tenant Protection Initiative. He referenced the Anaheim Contigo program, and noted that the City has built trust by providing residents with information, resources, and services. He expressed concern that tenants who submit information may expect assistance or guidance and stressed the importance of clearly communicating the program’s purpose and building confidence among tenants reporting potential issues.
Chief Communications Officer Lyster explained that the City plans to use an intentional and targeted outreach strategy to inform residents, particularly those in communities that may be most affected by high rents. He noted that Anaheim’s average rent is approximately $2,500 per month and City Council Minutes of September 22, 2026
emphasized that tenant protection laws are complex, as not every rent increase or eviction is subject to the law. He added that to build trust and provide accurate information, staff plans to work through established community resources, including the Housing Authority, Family Resource Centers, libraries, community centers, and community open houses, which already have trusted relationships with residents.
Mayor Pro Tem Leon suggested that the tenant protection webpage or intake process consider including a disclaimer or assurance that the City would contact the tenant before contacting a landlord or taking further action. He noted that providing tenants with this option could help them feel more comfortable submitting information and that the approach could evolve as the City gains experience and collects data through the pilot program.
Director of Housing and Community Development Grace Ruiz-Stepter explained that tenant concerns have historically been handled informally through calls to the Housing Department, where staff conduct an initial intake, speak with the tenant to gather additional information, and determine the appropriate response. She reported that it may include referring the tenant to the Public Law Center, providing additional guidance, or connecting them with other resources. She noted that the new process is intended to provide more structured guidance and data collection regarding two specific issues: whether a rent increase exceeds what is permitted by law and whether proper notice was provided for a no-fault eviction. She explained that the initiative was prompted in part by an increase in these types of concerns, including situations involving Hermosa Village and Philadelphia Street where families faced potential displacement following property purchases. She added that the new intake process will help the City track the frequency and nature of these issues and determine appropriate responses. She emphasized that the Housing Department would continue serving as a resource by connecting tenants with affordable housing referrals, Stay Housed assistance, or other services when appropriate, while the City Attorney’s Office could provide guidance regarding the applicable tenant protection laws.
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Leon, Chief Communications Officer Lyster explained that the tenant protection webpage can include links and referral information for the Housing Authority, particularly for residents living in Housing Authority-supported affordable housing communities where the intake process may not be the appropriate avenue. He identified trusted community resources, including the Fair Housing Council and Public Law Center, and noted that additional resources could be added to the webpage as the program evolves and the City identifies organizations it can confidently recommend to residents.
Mayor Pro Tem Leon asked about the anticipated duration of the Tenant Protection Intake Information Pilot Program and whether there is a specific timeline for the pilot. He inquired whether the program would continue for a set number of months or remain in place until staff determines that sufficient data has been collected to evaluate its effectiveness.
City Attorney Fabela stated that staff would like to evaluate the pilot program as soon as possible, but the timeline will depend on the volume and nature of submissions received. He noted that the goal is to return to the City Council with initial findings and seek direction within the first few months, allowing Council to determine whether the program is valuable, should be discontinued, or warrants additional resources.
Mayor Pro Tem Leon thanked staff for their work on the initiative and expressed support for moving forward with the pilot program to better understand tenant concerns and identify ways the City can assist residents.
City Council Minutes of September 22, 2026
Mayor Aitken thanked staff for their work and emphasized the importance of providing the community with accurate information and resources. She requested that the Tenant Protection Intake Information Pilot Program include a specific end date, suggesting six months, so that the City Council has a defined opportunity to review the program, assess what is working well, and identify areas for improvement.
City Attorney Fabela supported establishing a defined timeline for the pilot program, recommending that it last no more than six months and expressing a preference for returning to the City Council sooner if sufficient information is available.
Mayor Aitken noted that unlawful detainer cases can be particularly burdensome and that community legal partners, including Legal Aid and the Public Law Center, are often overwhelmed. She asked whether staff had considered including basic Orange County Superior Court forms on the tenant protection webpage, such as forms for responding to a three-day notice to quit or a 30-day eviction notice, while avoiding the creation of an attorney-client relationship between the City and tenants.
City Attorney Fabela agreed that the tenant protection webpage could provide additional resources and referrals for matters outside the scope of the program, including directing residents to appropriate forms or resources when an issue does not fall under the City’s tenant protection process. He emphasized, however, that the webpage must include cautionary language clarifying that submitting an inquiry does not create an attorney-client relationship with the City and that tenants remain responsible for protecting their own legal rights and meeting applicable deadlines.
Mayor Aitken asked whether the primary purpose of the Tenant Protection Initiative is to assist residents, collect data, or both. She suggested that, if assisting tenants is a goal, the City’s webpage could direct residents to the Orange County Superior Court website for basic self-represented litigant forms, particularly given the short response period for a three-day notice to quit. She asked whether State law provides the City with any authority to recover attorneys’ fees.
City Attorney Fabela explained that the City would recover costs if the City prevails in a civil action.
Mayor Aitken asked whether the program would provide a telephone number for residents who have questions or are unable to use the online intake system, and whether the Housing Authority’s phone number would be the appropriate contact for residents needing assistance.
City Attorney Fabela stated that the City will determine whether the appropriate telephone contact will be the City Attorney’s Office or the Housing Department and will provide a designated phone number for residents who need assistance.
In response to Mayor Aitken, Chief Communications Officer explained that, similar to the Contigo program, the City takes time to vet organizations before listing them as community resources. He stated that the City wants a high degree of confidence in any organization it refers residents to and indicated that some of the resources previously identified would meet that standard.
Mayor Aitken asked whether the City has reached out to County Counsel or the County to explore partnering on the Tenant Protection Initiative. She raised the possibility of a broader partnership so the City would not bear the full administrative workload associated with addressing tenant protection issues.
City Attorney Fabela stated that the City has not yet approached the County regarding a potential partnership. He described the current effort as an initial step focused on determining the scope of tenant protection issues in Anaheim. Once sufficient information is collected, the City can evaluate potential policy directions, additional resources, or partnerships with other agencies.
City Council Minutes of September 22, 2026
In response to Mayor Aitken, City Attorney Fabela reiterated that the current program is intended as an administrative step to collect data and identify individual situations that may warrant further City involvement or action.
Director Ruiz-Stepter explained that the Tenant Protection Initiative is focused on situations that generally occur before a tenant reaches the formal eviction stage. She noted that for rent increases, tenants typically contact the City shortly after receiving an increase they believe is incorrect or cannot afford, rather than withholding rent and facing eviction. She added that for no-fault evictions, the concerns generally involve tenants who have complied with their lease but receive an eviction notice because a new property owner intends to conduct extensive renovations and potentially increase rents. She distinguished these situations from traditional eviction cases involving tenants who are already significantly behind on rent, which are generally referred to the City’s Stay Housed program for assistance. She emphasized that the pilot is intentionally focused on the narrower set of rentincrease and no-fault eviction issues where tenants can seek information or assistance before reaching an immediate eviction deadline.
Mayor Aitken emphasized that some landlords may knowingly violate State law while others may simply be unaware of its requirements. She asked how tenants would determine whether a building is 15 years old or older, noting that most renters would not know the age of their apartment and may stop seeking assistance if they cannot find that information. She suggested providing a resource, such as a Zillow link or other tool, to help tenants obtain the property information needed to determine whether the law applies.
Chief Communications Officer Lyster acknowledged the complexity of determining a property’s age and explained that, generally, a property with a certificate of occupancy issued around 2010 or 2011 would be considered a newer development, while many apartment communities and other housing in Anaheim date back to the 1960s and 1970s. He indicated that tenants could provide their best estimate of the property’s age when submitting an inquiry, and the City could use the property address to determine the exact date applicable to the 15-year threshold.
Director Ruiz-Stepter added that Planning’s GIS system provides a specific year built for properties.
In response to Mayor Aitken, Chief Communications Officer confirmed that the date is a rolling date.
City Attorney Fabela suggested including an “I don’t know” option for tenants who are unsure of a property’s age, allowing City staff to determine the information if the issue appears applicable.
Mayor Aitken expressed strong support for the pilot, emphasizing the importance of collecting data to better understand renters’ concerns and the protections and information they need. She requested that the program return to Council within no more than six months to evaluate the data and discuss broader outreach efforts. She suggested developing “Know Your Tenant Rights” materials for distribution at libraries and community facilities, as well as exploring postings in common areas of older apartment buildings—similar to prior hotel worker emergency-protection outreach—that could provide tenants with a phone number or website for information about their rights. She noted that broader tenant education and outreach would be a future policy discussion, but emphasized the importance of ensuring renters have access to information and resources to understand and exercise their rights.
Director Ruiz-Stepter suggested adding Public Law Center “Know Your Rights” materials as a resource on the City’s tenant protection website. She also noted that the Public Law Center periodically conducts community workshops and suggested using the website to promote upcoming workshops and provide residents with information about when they will be available in Anaheim.
City Council Minutes of September 22, 2026
In response to Council Member Kurtz, City Attorney Fabela confirmed that responses would be provided in the language spoken by the reporting party.
Council Member Rubalcava explained that she frequently hears from residents at community events and while walking neighborhoods who raise concerns about significant rent increases and other tenant issues. She noted that while the Public Law Center is often present at community events, its services do not always cover these specific concerns, highlighting a gap in communication and available resources. She supported consolidating tenant “Know Your Rights” information and resources in one location on the City’s website so Councilmembers and residents can more easily access and share the information. She also emphasized the importance of educating tenants about existing rent-increase protections, noting that some residents may not know there are annual limits or may be experiencing multiple rent increases. She further clarified that the initiative was developed using existing City resources and did not involve requesting additional funding or authority beyond what is already available under State law. She expressed support for beginning the data-collection process and creating a centralized website rather than establishing a new tenant protection policy that may not be enforceable. She also referenced the County’s existing self-help resources for unlawful detainer proceedings and suggested directing tenants to those materials as an additional resource, while acknowledging the complexity of the eviction process.
Council Member Balius stated that he supports collecting and analyzing available data to better understand the issue. He expressed concern with the process, noting that he was not on the Council in May and was seeing the initiative for the first time. He questioned why a seemingly developed policy and website were already in place without first being brought before the City Council for review and discussion.
Informational item; no formal action taken by the City Council.
PUBLIC COMMENTS (non-agenda items): None
COUNCIL AGENDA SETTING:
Mayor Pro Tem Leon requested an update on the City’s preparations for El Niño and related State and agency planning. He emphasized the importance of proactive preparedness, particularly regarding homelessness, storm drains, and flood-prone areas such as La Palma near the District 2 and District 3 boundary. He requested that staff provide information on the City’s efforts to prepare and protect residents.
Interim City Manager Garcia shared that the City has established processes for preparing for storms, including community cleanups conducted in advance of anticipated weather events.
He added that staff would coordinate to review the City’s current preparations and planned efforts and provide an update to Council.
Council Member Meeks inquired if there were any further actions needed to agendize the investigation she requested during Council Communications.
City Attorney Robert Fabela confirmed that the process was underway.
Council Member Meeks requested that staff expedite discussion regarding the Stadium conditions report and future Stadium negotiations. She called for the Council to establish priorities for the property, review potential actions under the Surplus Land Act, and develop a framework for future negotiations. She emphasized the need to begin the process promptly, given the potential change in City Council Minutes of September 22, 2026
ownership, and determine whether the discussion should occur in open or closed session so the City is prepared for potential developments.
Council Member Maahs requested a recognition for Pastor Kim Skilling for her retirement from a District 3 church after ten years of service. She shared that she has worked with Pastor Skilling during her time with the Anaheim Historical Society and noted that she blessed her son’s backpack before the school year. She added that Pastor Skilling has brought food pantries, blessings of the animals, and innovative ways to connect residents with the community.
Council Member Rubalcava requested a presentation on the City’s E-Bike policy, including an update on the prohibition of E-Bikes on sidewalks, enforcement by the Anaheim Police Department, and community education efforts. She noted concerns regarding E-Bike safety and injuries involving both youth and adults and suggested partnering with the school district on education efforts. Council Member Rubalcava repeated her request to adjourn in memory of Sandra Vasquez.
ADJOURNMENT: With no further business before the Council, Mayor Aitken adjourned the City Council in memory of Nick Latimer, Sandra Vasquez, Felix E. Figueroa, and Joseph Nguyen, at 8:49 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Theresa Bass, CMC
City Clerk