Agenda — Anderson City Council, January 18, 2022

CITY COUNCIL AMENDED AGENDA

SPECIAL MEETING
January 18, 2022
CLOSED SESSION – 5:30 P.M.

ANDERSON CITY HALL
1887 Howard Street

PARTICIPATION BY PUBLIC IN MEETING
Please review the Agenda to determine if the subject you wish to discuss is scheduled for Council consideration. If it is on the Agenda, you will have an opportunity when that matter comes up for discussion to briefly address the Council.

If the subject is not on tonight’s Agenda, please complete an Agenda Request Form (on Clerk’s table) and present it to the City Council Clerk. You will have the opportunity to speak on the subject under Item 5.2. However, if the item is not on the Agenda, each speaker will be limited to one three (3) minute opportunity to speak, unless the City Council makes an exception due to special circumstances.

The Brown Act prohibits the Council from taking action on any item not placed on the printed Agenda in most cases.

The Brown Act requires any non-confidential documents or writings distributed to a majority of the City Council less than 72 hours before a regular meeting will be made available to members of the public at the same time they are distributed.

City Council meetings are televised and can be seen live on Cable Public Access Channel 181 (previously Channel 11) and on tape delay the following morning at 10:00 a.m. City Council meetings may also be viewed on the City’s website at www.ci.anderson.ca.us by clicking on the TV icon on the Home Page.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City of Anderson will make available to members of the public any special assistance necessary to participate in this meeting. The public should contact the City Clerk’s office (378-6646) to make such a request. Notification 72 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting.

This is an Equal Opportunity Program. Discrimination is prohibited by Federal Law.

Complaints of discrimination may be filed with the Secretary of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. 20250.

1.0 ROLL CALL – COUNCIL:

Councilmember Neutze
Councilmember Baugh
Councilmember Hunt
Vice-Mayor Gallagher
Mayor Browning

2.0 Public Comment on Closed Session Item(s): Anyone in the audience who wants to address the City Council on a subject which is listed under the Closed Session agenda is now invited to come to the podium. Please provide your name and the subject you wish to discuss. Please limit your remarks to 3 minutes or less.

CLOSED SESSION
C.S.1 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION (§ 54956.9)

Name of Case: Insignia Builders, Inc. v. City of Anderson, Shasta County Superior Court Case No. 197312.

Adjourn to regularly scheduled City Council meeting and report on closed session:

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
January 18, 2022
REGULAR SESSION - 6;00 P.M.

ANDERSON CITY HALL
1887 Howard Street

If the subject is not on tonight's Agenda, please complete an Agenda Request Form (on Clerk's table) and present it to the City Council Clerk. You will have the opportunity to speak on the subject under Item 5.2. However, if the item is not on the Agenda, each speaker will be limited to one three (3) minute opportunity to speak, unless the City Council makes an exception due to special circumstances.

The Brown Act prohibits the Council from taking action on any item not placed on the printed Agenda in most cases.

City Council meetings are televised and can be seen live on Cable Public Access Channel 181 (previously Channel 11) and on tape delay the following morning at 10:00 a.m. City Council meetings may also be viewed on the City's website at www.ci.anderson.ca.us by clicking on the TV icon on the Home Page.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City of Anderson will make available to members of the public any special assistance necessary to participate in this meeting. The public should contact the City Clerk's office (378-6646) to make such a request. Notification 72 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting.

This is an Equal Opportunity Program. Discrimination is prohibited by Federal Law.

Complaints of discrimination may be filed with the Secretary of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. 20250.

1.0 2.0

3.0 4.1

4.2 5.2
ROLL CALL - COUNCIL:

REGULAR SESSION - 6:00 P.M,
Councilmember Baugh
Councilmember Hunt
Councilmember Neutze
Vice-Mayor Gallagher
Mayor Browning
INVOCATION- Mayor's Choice.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Councilmember Baugh.

PROCLAMATION - Mayor Browning will present a Proclamation to Pathways for Hope recognizing January as Human Trafficking awareness month.

INTRODUCTIONS
a. Anderson Police Chief Jon Poletski will introduce new Police Officer Austin Klein and conduct swearing in and pinning.
b. Anderson Police Chief Jon Poletski will introduce newly promoted Sergeant Tyler Finch and conduct swearing in and pinning.

PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA - This is the time to address public comments by any member of the public to the Council regarding an item not on the agenda. Each comment must be limited to 3 minutes or less and on an item within the City's subject matter jurisdiction. The Brown Act does not permit any action or discussion on items not listed on the agenda. Are there any public comments?

CONSENT AGENDA

6.0 CONSENT AGENDA - Consent Agenda items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any member of the public, staff or City Council may request that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda for separate discussion. Are there any requests to remove any items from the Consent Agenda?

6.1 MINUTES -Approve the minutes of the regular meeting of January 4, 2022.

6.2 WARRANTS - Receive and file warrant 23933 to 23988 in the amount of $106,053.55; Receive and file warrant 23989 to 24059 in the amount of $385,299.54; Receive and file ACH in the amount of $285.00; Receive and file ACH in the amount of $44,902.67.

END OF CONSENT AGENDA

6.11 ITEMS (IF ANX) REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA - Items removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion will be treated as Regular Agenda items and any member of the public may request to address the Council on any such item as it comes up for discussion. Please provide your name and limit your remarks to 3 minutes or less.

REGULAR AGENDA

8.0 REGULAR AGENDA - Regular Agenda Items will be discussed individually and in order.

Any member of the public may request to address the Council on an item as it comes up for discussion. Please provide your name and limit your remarks to 3 minutes or less.

CITY COUNCIL

8.1 SUPPORT FOR ACTIONS TO FURTHER STRENGTHEN LOCAL DEMOCRACY,

AUTHORITY AND CONTROL
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Consider adopting a Resolution in support of actions to further strengthen local democracy, authority and control as related to local zoning and housing issues.

CITY ATTORNEY

8.2 APPROVE RECOVERED ORGANIC WASTE PROCUREMENT POLICY PURSUANT TO SENATE BILL 1383.

8.3 RECOMMENDED ACTION;

1. Receive a Staff Report

2. Consider Resolution approving the Recovered Organic Waste Procurement Policy Pursuant to Senate Bill 1383.

CITY MANAGER

PARTICIPATE IN THE PURCHASE OF A LENCO BEARCAT RESCUE VEHICLE WITH

SHASTA COUNTY AND THE CITY OF SHASTA LAKE
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. Consider adopting a Resolution to participate in the purchase of a Lenco Bearcat rescue vehicle with Shasta County and City of Shasta Lake.

2. Direct the Finance Director to amend the budget in the amount of $39,443.

DEPUTY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

8.9a LOCAL ROAD SAFETY PLAN FOR THE CITY OF ANDERSON
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Consider adoption of a resolution adopting the Draft Local Road Safety Plan for the City of Anderson.

8.9b PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT WITH PACE ENGINEERING, INC RECOMMENDED ACTION;
Authorize the City Manager to execute a Professional Service Agreement with PACE Engineering to update the City's Urban Water Management Plan.

8.9c APPROVE A SUB-RECIPIENT COOPERATION AGREEMENT WITH SHASTA REGIONAL

TRANSPORTATION AGENCY (SRTA)

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Authorize the City Manager to execute Sub-Recipient Cooperation Agreement with Shasta Regional Transportation Agency (SRTA); and authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to act as signatory on all matters related to the agreement and any amendments thereto.

10.0 STAFF REPORTS - Matt Baker will give a recap of use at the Ice Rink.

11.0 COUNCIL REPORTS/COMMENTS - City Councilmembers will report on attendance at conferences/meetings reimbursed at City expense (Requirement of Assembly Bill 1234.)

14.0 ADJOURN -The City Council wiU adjourn to February 1. 2022.

Citp of anberson
.t)roclamation
1!,uman m;raffitking ~tuareness montb
JI anuarp 2022
WHEREAS, as a society, we have a responsibility to nurture and protect our children and help ensure they become healthy and productive adults; and WHEREAS, the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children received 17,000 reports of possible child sex trafficking; and
WHEREAS, FBI crime analysis puts California as having the highest rates of child exploitation in the western region of the United States; and WHEREAS, The American Journal of Public Health reported that a significant number of child trafficking victims reported an Adverse Childhood Experience (ACE's) score of 6 or more. Shasta County reports nearly 40% of residents have an ACE score of 4 or higher; and WHEREAS, The American Journal of Public Health states that sexual abuse was the strongest predictor of human trafficking; and
WHEREAS, everyone in the community should become more aware of human trafficking and consider helping parents and caregivers raise their children in a safe, nurturing environment; and
WHEREAS, Pathways to Hope for Children (Shasta County's Child Abuse Prevention Coordinating Council) strengthens families in our community by providing education to parents in the community regarding the avenues in which child-trafficking can occur and the importance of building protective factors to ensure the safety of all children so they will grow to their full potential; and
WHEREAS, in the City of Anderson there are numerous committed agencies, schools, parents, relatives, community volunteers, public policymakers and professionals who are collaborating their efforts to provide education, prevention, detection, support and pathways to healing.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Anderson joins in declaring January 2022 to be "Human Trafficking Awareness Month," and in so declaring, City of Anderson officials, employees and citizens are encouraged to join the important efforts of all partners serving children and families by working together to protect children and end human traffi eking.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Corporate Seal of the City of Anderson to be affixed this 18th day of January 2022
Baron Browning, Mayor

ANDERSON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Regular Meeting
January 4, 2022

REGULAR SESSION
The regular session was called to order at 6:00 p.m.

ROLL CALL
Councilmembers present: Councilmember Neutze
Councilmember Baugh
Councilmember Hunt
Vice-Mayor Gallagher
Mayor Browning
DRAFT
Also present: City Manager Jeff Kiser, Assistant City Manager Liz Cottrell, City Attorney Collin Bogener, Police Chief Jon Poletski and City Clerk Christy White.

INVOCATION
Doug Deese, Neighborhood Church of Anderson/Cottonwood, gave the invocation.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Councilmember Melissa Hunt led the Pledge of Allegiance.

PRESENTATION
The newly seated Mayor Baron Browning presented a Plaque of Appreciation to Mayor Baugh for her outstanding service as Mayor of the City of Anderson during 2021.

Supervisor Les Baugh also presented Mayor Baugh a certificate of appreciation from the Shasta County Board of Supervisors.

PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA - None

CONSENT AGENDA
By motion made, second (Neutze/Gallagher) and carried by a 5-0 vote, Council took the following action.

Approved the minutes of the regular meeting of December 21, 2021.

ITEM 6.1 1/18/2022
City Council Meeting
January 18, 2022

Page 2 of 3 ends

Received and filed warrant 23832 to 23920 in the amount of $186,732.36; Received and filed warrant 23921 to 23932 in the amount of $220,235.76; Received and filed ACH in the amount of $285.00; Received and filed ACH in the amount of $42,862.74.

Adopted Resolution 22-01 establishing regular City Council meeting dates for the year 2022.
~: AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Councilmembers Neutze, Gallagher, Baugh, Hunt and Mayor Browning.

None.

PUBLIC HEARINGS
ALL NOTICES WERE GIVEN ACCORDING TO LAW.

PUBLIC HEARING- CONSIDER APPEAL OF MODIFICATION OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 19-01- EAST STREET INDUSTRIAL PARK. UNIT 2
Attorney Collin Bogener gave a staff report and answered questions from Council. 6;14 pm the public hearing was open.

Attorney Leonard Bandell spoke regarding modifying the language for TSM 19-01 asking that Council amend the planning commission decision to leave the language the same.

Council asked questions of both Mr. Bandell and Jack Baker. Mr. Baker made the decision to cancel his request to modify.
7;11 pm the public hearing was closed.

By motion made, seconded (Baugh/Neutze) and carried by a 5-0 vote Council voted to approve City Council Resolution No. 22-02, accepting modified language for TSM 19-01 conditions of approval 16(c), 37, and 44, and maintaining condition of approval No. 23(d) previously approved the Planning Commission subject to making the findings contained in the Resolution.

Vote: AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Councilmembers Baugh, Neutze, Hunt, Gallagher, and Mayor Browning.

None.

City Council Meeting
January 18, 2022

Page 3 of 3 ends

REGULAR AGENDA

CITY MANAGER

REVIEW OF MAYOR'S CITY SELECTION COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS City Manager Jeff Kiser gave a staff report and turned the discussion over to Mayor Browning to discuss selections to committees for the year 2022. The decision was made to leave the selections the same as the previous year.

INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL OF SHOPPING CENTERS NOW CALLED INNOVATING COMMERCE SERVING COMMUNITIES, RECON MAY 22M24, 2022
City Manager Jeff Kiser gave a staff report asking for direction on the attendance ofRECON in May 2022 in Las Vegas. Councilmember Neutze, Vice Mayor Gallagher and Councilmember Baugh indicated they would like to attend.

By motion made, seconded (Gallagher/Hunt) and carried by a 4MO vote Council voted to approve sending Councilmember Neutze and Vice Mayor Gallagher.

Vote: AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Councilmembers Gallagher, Hunt, Neutze and Mayor Browning.

None.

Baugh
None.

COUNCIL REPORTS/COMMENTS
Councilmembers used this time to report on meetings and activities they participated in and to announce upcoming events.

ADJOURNMENT
7;2Qp,m,; The City Council adjourned to Tanua,:y 18, 2022, Baron Browning, Mayor
ATTEST:

Christy White, City Clerk

AGENDA ITEM
! January 18, 2022 City Council Meeting
Approved for Submittal By:
-~
ottrell, Finance Director /Treasurer
To:

Through:

Honorable Mayor and Members of the Anderson City Council Jeff Kiser, City Manager
From: Liz Cottrell, Finance Director /Treasurer
Date: January 18, 2022
!SUBJECT
Receive and File Weekly Warrant Registers.

I RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file warrant 23933 to 23988 in the amount of $106,053.55; Receive and file warrant 23989 to 24059 in the amount of $385,299.54; Receive and file ACH in the amount of $285.00; Receive and file ACH in the amount of $44,902.67. !ATTACHMENT
Warrant Registers.

ITEM 6.2 PAGE1 01/18/2022
Check Register Report
Date: 12/30/2021
Time: 9:03 am
ty of Anderson BANK: TRI COUNTIES BANK Page: 1
:heck Check Status Reconcile Vendor Vendor Name Check Description Amount lumber Date Date Number "Rl COUNTIES BANK Checks
3933 12/27/2021 Printed 708803 SWRCB-OFFICE OF OPERATOR CERTIFICATE RENEWAL-KNIGHT 70.00 '3934 12/30/2021 Printed 90359 ACUITY SPECIALTY SUPPLIES 258.33

PRODUCTS, INC
:3935 12/30/2021 Printed 05645 AMERICAN FIDELITY INSURANCE PREMIUM DEC-21 3.422.36

ASSURANCE
'.3936 12/30/2021 Printed 05644 AMERICAN FIDELITY CAFETERIA 125 PIE 12/10/21 307.67

ASSURANCE CO
:3937 12/30/2021 Printed 05639 AMERICAN LEAK DETECTION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 350.00 :3938 12/30/2021 Printed 102600 ANDERSON TROPHIES AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 113 67 AWARDS
:3939 12/30/2021 Printed 0580 APOA DUES FOR PIE 12124/2021 1,080.00 :3940 12/30/2021 Printed 11095 AT&T PHONE CHARGES 101 .04 !3941 12/30/2021 Printed 111011 AT&T CALNET PHONE CHARGES 67.83 !3942 12/30/2021 Printed BAFROO BADGE FRAME, INC. PROFESSIONAL SVCS & 338.22

SUPPLIES
!3943 12/30/2021 Printed 5069 BRIGHrs ENGRAVING AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 26.81 TROPHY
!3944 12/30/2021 Printed 12073 CA RURAL WATER ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP 1,237.00

ASSOCIATION
!3945 12/30/2021 Printed 1220 CALIFORNIA VISION SERVICE INSURANCE PREMIUM JAN-22 382.40 !3946 12130/2021 Printed 131750 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS BUSINESS SERVICES 758.87 !3947 12/30/2021 Printed 13760 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 1,184.81 DIST.
!3948 12/30/2021 Printed 13909 COPY CATS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 111 .53 !3949 12/30/2021 Printed 1430 CROWN MOTORS PROFESSIONAL SVCS & PARTS 2,563.53 !3950 12/30/2021 Printed 149005 DE LAGE LANDEN FINANCIAL SINTF-MONTHL Y LEASE 230.23 SVC
!3951 12/30/2021 Printed DEJUOO DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE CASE ID# 410000000045532 12/24 304.06 (SOU)
!3952 12/30/2021 Printed 151508 DRAKE VEGETATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 350.00

MANAGEMENT
!3953 12/30/2021 Printed 159455 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, SUPPLIES 4,105.61 INC.
!3954 12/30/2021 Printed 16117013 TYLER FINCH PER DIEM-TRAINING 259.00 !3955 12/30/2021 Printed 1659590 MIKE GALLAGHER HEAL TH INS. REIMBURSEMENT 344.00 !3956 12/30/2021 Printed GHINOO GHD, INC. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5.435.62 !3957 12130/2021 Printed 90235 GOODYEAR COMMERCIAL TIRE PROFESSIONAL SVCS & 1,480.73

EQUIPMENT
!3958 12/30/2021 Printed JEHEOO JEANNINE HENDRICKSON PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 290.00 !3959 12/30/2021 Printed STHUOO STACY HUBANKS PER DIEM-TRAVEL 17.00 !3960 12/30/2021 Printed 1840 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 457 PLAN #302204 P/E 12/24/2021 2.435.00 !3961 12/30/2021 Printed JEJIOO JENNIFER JIMERSON PER DIEM-TRAVEL 17.00 !3962 12/30/2021 Printed 190800 K & S STAFFING SOLUTIONS, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 279.78 INC.
!3963 12/30/2021 Printed MAMIOO MARCUS MIYASASTO SINTF-PER DIEM TRAINING 310.50 !3964 12/30/2021 Printed 2042 MUNICIPAL MTNC. EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES 1,293.71 23965 12/30/2021 Printed KIMUOO KITI MURRISON, PH.D. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 425.00 23966 12/30/2021 Printed 303894 02 STAFFING, INC. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 411.75 23967 12/30/2021 Printed 3051 OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE SUPPLIES 175.31 23968 12/30/2021 Printed PAANOO PACE ANALYTICAL SVCS., LLC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 153.60 23969 12/30/2021 Void Void Check 0.00
23970 12/30/2021 Printed 4000 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC UTILITIES 48,397.87 23971 12/3012021 Printed 40736 PLATI SUPPLIES 745.83
23972 12/30/2021 Printed 50200 REDDING RECORD ADVERTISING 244.65

SEARCHLIGHT
23973 12/30/2021 Printed SSOIOO SST OIL FUEL SUPPLIES 15,149.72 23974 12/30/2021 Printed 70800 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ASSIGN OF WAGES PIE 12/24/21 510.66 23975 12/30/2021 Printed JOST01 JOHN STRAIN CJSSP EXPENSE 62.37

REIMBURSEMENT
23976 12/30/2021 Printed SUREOO SUNBELT RENTALS, INC. EQUIPMENT RENTAL 2,115.67 23977 12/30/2021 Printed 70878 SW MAINTENANCE CORP. MONTHLY UST TESTING 130.00 23978 12/30/2021 Printed 70880 SWRCB FEES ANNUAL PERMIT FEE-5SS010781,326.00 Check Register Report
Date: 12/30/2021
Time:
ty of Anderson BANK: TRI COUNTIES BANK Page:
:heck Check Status
lumber Date
Reconcile Vendor
Date Number Vendor Name Check Descr1pt[on
"RI COUNTIES BANK Checks
.3979 12/30/2021 Printed TEL100 TEXAS LIFE INSURANCE INSURANCE PREMIUM

COMPANY
'3980 12/30/2021 Printed 80101 USA BLUEBOOK SUPPLIES
3981 12/30/2021 Printed 16735 VCAGATEWAYANIMAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

HOSPITAL
:3982 12/30/2021 Printed 81539 VERIZON WIRELESS SINTF-PHONE CHARGES :3983 12/30/2021 Void Void Check
'.3984 12/30/2021 Printed 81539 VERIZON WIRELESS PHONE CHARGES '.3985 12/30/2021 Printed 8155 VESTRA RESOURCES INC. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES '.3986 12/30/2021 Printed 8047 VIC HANNAN LANDSCAPE INC. MATERIALS '.3987 12/30/2021 Printed 807261 WASTE MANAGEMENT RECYCLE SERVlCES ~3988 12/30/2021 Printed 80907 WESTERN BUSINESS SINTF-MONTHL Y LEASE

PRODUCTS
Total Checks: 56 Checks Total (excluding void checks):

Total Payments: 56 Bank Total (excludfng void checks):

Total Payments: 56 Grand Total (excluding void checks):
1 d""J 30}zo2/
Date
12/30/2021 ACH Members First Credit Union $285.00
For Payroll Ending 12/24/2021
12/30/2021 ACH PERS $44,902.67
For Payroll Ending 12/24/2021
9:03am
2 Amount
701 .24

83.97 60.37
548.33

0.00 1,954.56
1,053.00
142.77

5.00 129.57
106,053.55
106,053.55
106,053.55
Check Register Report
Date: 01/0712022
Time: 9:26 am
ty of Anderson BANK· TRI COUNTIES BANK Page: 1
:heck Check Status Reconcile Vendor Vendor Name Check Description Amount lumber Date Date Number "RI COUNTIES BANK Checks
:3989 01107/2022 Printed 90359 ACUITY SPECIAL TY SUPPLIES 87.51

PRODUCTS, INC
3990 01 /07/2022 Printed 05644 AMERICAN FIDELITY CAFETERIA 125 PIE 12/24/2021 307.67

ASSURANCE CO
3991 01/07/2022 Void Void Check 0.00
.3992 01/07/2022 Printed 111011 AT&T CALNET PHONE CHARGES 1,046.84 3993 01 /07/2022 Printed BAMEOO BADGER METER , INC. EQUIPMENT 1,445.84 3994 01 /07/2022 Printed MABA02 MATT BAKER CELL PHONE REIMBURSEMENT 75.00 :3995 01/07/2022 Printed 1137902 BIG VALLEY SANITATION EQUIPMENT RENTAL 700.00 '3996 01/07/2022 Printed 1171 STEPHEN BLUNK CELL PHONE REIMBURSEMENT 75.00 3997 01/07/2022 Printed 1210 CALIFORNIA SAFETY CO. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 48 00 "3998 01 /07/2022 Printed 126244 CASCADE COMFORT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 254.88

SERVICES
•3999 01 /07/2022 Printed 131750 CHARTER COMMUNICAH ONS INTERNET SERVICES 918.51 :4000 01/07/2022 Printed 1300 CHEMSEARCH SUPPLIES 457.20 :4001 01/07/2022 Printed 132201 CITY OF REDDING UTILITIES 307.37 '4002 01/07/2022 Printed CONEOO CONEXWEST EQUIPMENT 7,386.86 :4003 01/07/2022 Printed 1414 LIZ COTTRELL CELL PHONE REIMBURSEMENT 75.00 :4004 01/07/2022 Printed 141597 CRESCO EQUIPMENT RENTALS EQUIPMENT RENTAL 2,067.46 '4005 01/07/2022 Printed 147730 DEPT OF HOUSING AND COMM STATE FEES & MRLPP FEES 3,100.00 DEV.
'4006 01/07/2022 Printed 154855 ENERPOWER UTILITIES 1,525.00 :4007 01/07/2022 Printed 05808 FASTENERS INC. SUPPLIES 9.68 '4008 01/07/2022 Printed 159455 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES,
INC.

SUPPLIES 9,341 .16
'4009 01/07/2022 Printed 16605 GALLS. LLC SUPPLIES 105.56 '.4010 01/07/2022 Printed BEHAOO BEAU HAMIL TON UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 900 .00 :4011 01/07/2022 Printed 17895 HAVEN HUMANE SOCIETY ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES 7,484.75 '4012 01/07/2022 Printed 179484 ERIC HAYNES PER DIEM-TRAINING 28.00 '.4013 01/07/2022 Printed 1850430 INLAND BUSINESS MACHINES. MONTHLY LEASE & ORTL Y 1,119.92

INC OVERAGE
'.4014 01/07/2022 Printed 185071 INTL. ASSN FOR PROPTY. & ANNUAL MEMBER 130.00

EVIDN DUES-JIMMERSON
'.4015 01/07/2022 Printed JTCOOO J & T CONSUL TING, INC LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 1,435.08 '.4016 01/07/2022 Printed 1875 JMB OIL COMPANY FUEL CHARGES 589.28 '.4017 01/07/2022 Void Vold Check 0 00
'.4018 01/07/2022 Printed 190800 K & S STAFFING SOLUTIONS. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 11,203.79 INC.
'.4019 01/07/2022 Printed 1918003 JEFF KISER CELL PHONE REIMBURSEMENT 75.00 '.4020 01/07/2022 Printed TYKNOO TYLER KNIGHT UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 900.00 '.4021 01/07/2022 Void Void Check 0.00
'.4022 01/07/2022 Printed 1929 LAUNDRY WORLD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,092.03 '.4023 01/07/2022 Printed 193589 LEHR AUTO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,294.73 '.4024 01/07/2022 Printed 1940 LES SCHWAB TIRES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 20.00 !4025 01/07/2022 Printed 2040 MT. SHASTA SPRING WATER DRINKING WATER 175.17 !4026 01/07/2022 Printed MUCOOO MUSE CONCRETE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 16,973.00 CONTRACTORS. INC
!4027 01/07/2022 Printed 2060 N.C G.T. TRUST FUND HEAL TH INS. PREMIUM JAN~22 97,804.00 !4028 01/07/2022 Printed 20651 NCCSIF WORKERS COMPENSATION IN57.313.00 !4029 01/07/2022 Printed 20741 NETSOUND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5,690.00 !4030 01/07/2022 Printed 302935 NORTH VALLEY BUSINESS SUPPLIES 20.42

SYSTEMS
!4031 01/07/2022 Printed 30383 NORTHWOOD BACKFLOW

SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6,670.00
!4032 01/07/2022 Printed 303894 02 STAFFING. INC. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 274.50 !4033 01/07/2022 Prfnted 3051 OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE SUPPLIES 100.86 !4034 01/07/2022 Printed PAANOO PACE ANALYTICAL SVCS .• LLC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,566.20 !4035 01/07/2022 Printed 118992 PEOPLE FACTS, LLC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 24.12 !4036 01/07/2022 Printed PHPROO PH&S PRODUCTS, LLC SUPPLIES 4,831.92 !4037 01/07/2022 Printed 40736 PLATT SUPPLIES 964.46
!4038 01/07/2022 Printed JOPOOO JON POLETSKI CELL PHONE REIMBURSEMENT 75.00 ty of Anderson
heck Check Status
umber Date
RI COUNTIES BANK Checks
4039 01/07/2022 Printed
4040 01/07/2022 Printed
4041 01/07/2022 Printed
4042 01/07/2022 Printed
4043 01/07/2022 Printed
4044 01/07/2022 Printed
4045 01/07/2022 Printed
4046 01/07/2022 Printed
4047 01/07/2022 Printed
4048 01/07/2022 Printed
4049 01/07/2022 Printed
4050 01/07/2022 Printed
4051 01/07/2022 Printed
4052 01/07/2022 Printed
4053 01/07/2022 Printed
4054 01/07/2022 Void
4055 01/07/2022 Void
4056 01/07/2022 Printed
4057 01/07/2022 Printed
4058 01/07/2022 Printed
4059 01/07/2022 Printed
Check Register Report
Date: 01/0712022
Time:

BANK: TRI COUNTIES BANK Page:
9:26 am
2 Reconcile Vendor
Date Number
Date
4073902
407408
407509
500973
SESAOO
6005712
60356
6050
706732
706860
CRSTOO
7085985
70880
80040
8009290
800926
81597
CHWHOO
PEWIOO
Total Checks: 71
Total Payments: 71
Total Payments: 71
Vendor Name Check Description Amount

ROBYN POPE-BURGESS

POSTMASTER

PROFORCE LAW

ENFORCEMENT

NATHAN RAMIREZ
SESAC, INC.

HOPE SETH
SHASTA CO. ARTS COUNCIL
SHASTA CO.OPPORTUNITY
CENTER

SPECIAL SERVICES GROUP,
LLC

TYLER SPURGEON

CRYSTAL STERNBERG
SUNRISE EXCAVATING, INC.

SWRCB FEES

TOMASINI BLACKSMITHING &
U.S. BANK

US BANK CORP PYMT

SYSTEMS
VlRTUAL PROJECT MANAGER

CHRISTY WHITE

PETER WICKENHEISER
CELL PHONE REIMBURSEMENT 75.00
SINTF-PO BOX FEE 204,00
SUPPLIES 505.35
CELL PHONE REIMBURSEMENT 75.00
LICENSE FEE 513.00
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,750.00
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 61 .00
JANITORIAL SERVICES 3,281 .25
SINTF-ANNUAL COVERT 3.600.00

RENEWAL
PER DIEM-TRAINING 28.00
CLEANING DEPOSIT REFUND 350 00
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 73,356.20
ANNUAL WATER SYSTEM FEE 9,941.08
SUPPLIES 81 .89
FACILITY LEASE A/C #2078770009,458.17
Void Check 0.00
Vord Check 0.00
SUPPLIES. EQUIPMENT & 32,279.83

TRAINING
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 500 .. 00
CELL PHONE REIMBURSEMENT 75.00
CELL PHONE REIMUBURSEMENT 75.00
Checks Total (exctudlng void checks): 385,299.54
Bank Total (excluding void checks): 385,299.54
Grand Total (excluding void checks): 385,299.54

AGENDA ITEM
! January 18, 2022 City Council Meeting
z< ·::,
Baron Browning, Mayor
To:

Through:

Honorable Mayor and Members of the Anderson City Council Jeff Kiser, City Manager
From: Baron Browning, Mayor
Date: January 18, 2022
!SUBJECT
Support for actions to further strengthen local democracy, authority and control.

I RECOMMENDATION
Consider adopting a Resolution in support of actions to further strengthen local democracy, authority and control as related to local zoning and housing issues.

I FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact.

I DISCUSSION
California Cities for Local Control is a volunteer organization whose mission is to spread awareness and enlist support to ensure that Cities can continue to manage their own land use and zoning issues. We must not allow the State Legislature to mandate changes to our Cities that will remove local control and be detrimental to our communities. They do this by reaching out to California City Elected Officials to educate and enlist them to our cause.

Their activities include, but are not limited to, signing onto petitions, having Cities pass resolutions in support of our efforts, and seeking out allies for possible legal action against the State and/or to promote efforts for a ballot initiative to legislate the desired results.

ITEM 8.1 PAGE1 1/18/2022
!ATTACHMENT

1. Mission Statement

2. Proposed Resolution
ITEM 8.1a PAGE2 1/18/2022
Mission Statement
California Cities FOR Local Control
Volunteer Organization
Our mission is to spread awareness and enlist support to ensure that Cities can continue to manage their own land use and zoning issues. We must not allow the State Legislature to mandate changes to our Cities that will remove local control and be detrimental to our communities.

We do this by reaching out to California City Elected Officials to educate and enlist them to our cause. Our activities include, but are not limited to, signing onto petitions, having Cities pass resolutions in support of our efforts, and seeking out allies for possible legal action against the State and/or to promote efforts for a ballot initiative to legislate the desired results.

Wrth this alliance of City Elected Officials working together as one. we stand a better chance of having our message resonate loud and clear to all groups that proclaim to support us.

WE WILL NOT STANO FOR THIS LOSS OF LOCAL CONTROL AND UNFUNDED MANDA TES being imposed upon us by our State.

RESOLUTION NO. 22-
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Anderson, Expressing Support for the "Brand-Huang-Mendoza Tripartisan Land Use Initiative" to Amend Article Xi of The Constitution of the State of California to make Zoning and Land Use Community Affairs, and not of State Interest
WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of California in recent years has proposed, passed, and signed into law a number of bills addressing a range of land use planning and housing issues; and WHEREAS, the majority of these bills usurp the authority of local jurisdictions to determine for themselves the land use policies and practices that best suit each city and its residents and instead impose "one-size-fits-all" mandates that do not take into account the unique needs and differences oflocal jurisdictions throughout the State of California; and WHEREAS, the majority of these bills do not provide any incentives or requirements for low-income affordable or moderate-income workforce housing, but instead impose new policies that will incentivize speculation and result in the addition of market-rate or luxury housing, thereby eliminating the opportunity for local jurisdictions to implement effective policies that will create more affordable housing and affirmatively further fair housing practices; and
WHEREAS, the ability of local jurisdictions to determine for themselves which projects require review beyond ministerial approval; what parking requirements are appropriate for various neighborhoods; what housing plans and programs are suitable and practical for each community; and what zoning should be allowed for residential properties, rather than having these decisions imposed upon cities without regard for the unique circumstances and needs of each individual community, is a matter of critical importance to the City of Anderson and many other municipalities focused on local zoning and housing issues; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Anderson hereby determines that local government entities are best able to assess and respond to the unique needs of their respective communities and hereby objects to the proliferation of State legislation (including SB 9 and SB 10) that would deprive us of that ability.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Anderson resolves as follows:

SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Anderson is opposed to the legislature of the State of California continually proposing and adopting legislation that overrides the zoning and land use authority of local government and inhibits the ability of local government to effectively plan for and implement policies to stimulate the efficient production of affordable housing in the City of Anderson.

SECTION 2. The City Council of the City of Anderson supports the Brand-Huang-Mendoza Tripartisan Land Use Initiative (Attached to the Resolution as Exhibit A) to ensure that zoning and land use authority rests with the local government entities that represent the communities in which the residents reside, and to allow local government to participate in solving our affordable housing crisis through solutions that effectively address the unique needs and conditions of each local community.

SECTION 3. That the City Council of the City of Anderson incorporates each recital set forth herein above.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Anderson on this 18th day of January 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Baron Browning, Mayor
ATTEST:

Christy White, City Clerk

AGENDA ITEM
I January 18, 2022 City Council Meeting
To:

Through:

From:

Date:
!SUBJECT
Jeff Kiser, City Manager
Collin Bogener, City Attorney
January 18, 2022
Approve Recovered Organic Waste Procurement Policy Pursuant to Senate Bill 1383.

I RECOMMENDATION
The City Attorney recommends that the City Council:

1. Receive a Staff Report

2. Consider Resolution approving the Recovered Organic Waste Procurement Policy Pursuant to Senate Bill 1383.

I FISCAL IMPACT
Fiscal impact is unknown at this time.

I DISCUSSION and BACKGROUND
In September 2016, Governor Brown signed into law Senate Bill (SB) 1383 (Lara, Chapter 395, Statutes of 2016, Short-Lived Climate Pollutants: Methane Emissions Reductions), the most significant waste reduction mandate to be adopted in California in the last 30 years.

SB 1383 adds Sections 39730.5, 39730.6, 39730.7, and 39730.8 to the California Health and Safety Code, and adds Chapter 13.1 (commencing with Section 42652) to Part 3 of Division 30 of the California Public Resources Code, relating to methane emissions.

ITEM 8.2 PAGE1 1/18/2022
The final regulations of SB 1383 were approved on November 3, 2020. The intent of SB 1383 is to reduce short-lived climate pollutants (SLCP) that contribute to greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution resulting from decomposing organic waste, specifically food scrap waste. As defined by the legislation, the three main goals of SB 1383 are: 1) Reducing organic waste disposal by 50 percent of the 2014 level by 2020; 2) Reducing organic waste disposal by 75 percent of 2014 levels by 2025, which would be more than 20-million tons; and 3) Recovering 20 percent of currently disposed of edible food for human consumption through food banks, and related human services organizations by 2025.

SB 1383 requires the City to adopt an enforceable ordinance to compel businesses and residents to recycle their organic and food waste, and comply with other requirements of the regulation, while putting the responsibility for funding, administrating, and implementing those goals on the City. The City could face penalties of up to $10,000 per day for failing to comply with SB 1383 effective January 1, 2022. Recently, SB 619 was signed by the Governor allowing penalty relief during calendar year 2022 as long as there is a corrective action plan in place to ensure compliance.

Compliance requirements include:

1. Providing Organic Collection Services to All Residents and Businesses - Organic waste consists of, but not limited to, green waste, food waste, fibers, and wood waste. Landfills will no longer accept organic waste for disposal, and must be sent to facilities where it will be recycled in a way that prevents the release of SLCPs.

2. Reporting - Keeping appropriate records and reporting to the State on SB 1383 implementation. This will include information about solid waste container inspections, violators, and food-recovery programs used by businesses that must comply with SB 1383's edible food recovery requirement.

3. Enforcement and Compliance - Container contamination must be monitored, and violators who inappropriately dispose their organic waste must be cited by the City.

4. Procurement - The City will be required to meet minimum targets for procuring recycled and recovered organic products that will be based on its population size.

Examples of organic products include compost, mulch, biomass derived electricity, or renewable gas.

5. Education - The City will be required to conduct education and outreach on reducing organic waste.

6. Establish Edible Food Recovery Program - Required edible food generators must recover the maximum amount of edible food that would otherwise be disposed of, to instead feed people. Businesses must have a program in place to track and report this activity, and the City is responsible for implementing a program to educate businesses about food recovery, generator requirements, and food recovery organizations.

ITEM 8.2 PAGE2 1/18/2022
On December 7, 2021, the City Council enacted an ordinance adding Chapter 8.65 to the Anderson Municipal Code providing the enforcement mechanism required pursuant to SB 1383.

As an additional component, the City is also required to adopt an organic waste procurement policy. Per the policy, beginning on January 1, 2022, the City is required to annually procure for use or giveaway a quantity of recovered organic waste products that meets or exceeds its annual target.

I ATTACHMENTS
Proposed Resolution
ITEM 8.2 PAGE3 1/18/2022
Resolution No. 22·

A RESOLUTION OF THE ANDERSON CITY COUNCIL ADOPTING A RECOVERED

ORGANIC WASTE PRODUCT PROCUREMENT POLICY
WHEREAS, Senate Bill 1383 was adopted by the California legislature in 2016, titled the Short-lived Climate Pollutant Reduction Act of 2016 ("SB 1383") with the purpose of developing regulations to reduce organics in landfills as a source of methane; and WHEREAS, SB 1382 requires jurisdictions to procure a targeted amount of organic waste products in the form of compost, mulch, renewable natural gas, and/or electricity generated from biomass conversion; and
WHEREAS, SB 1383 also requires a jurisdiction to procure paper that is recyclable and contains at least 30 percent of post-consumer recycled content; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Anderson would like to adopt a policy to meet the requirements of SB 1383 with said policy attached as Exhibit "A" to this resolution and titled "Recovered Organic Waste Product Procurement Policy," and WHEREAS, the purpose of the policy, in addition to SB 1383 compliance, is to (1) protect and conserve natural resources, water and energy, (2) minimize the jurisdiction's contribution to pollution and solid waste disposal, and (3) comply with state requirements as contained in 14 CCR Division 7, Chapter 12, Article 12 (SB 1383 procurement regulations) to procure a specified amount of Recovered Organic Waste Products to support Organic Waste disposal reduction targets and markets for products made from recycled and recovered Organic Waste materials, and to purchase recycled content paper products and recycled-content printing and writing paper.

Now, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Anderson hereby adopts the Recovered Organic Waste Product Procurement Policy as a policy of the City.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY the City Council of the City of Anderson on January 18, 2022 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Baron Browning. Mayor
ATTEST:

Christy White, City Clerk

CITY OF ANDERSON EXHIBIT A

RECOVERED ORGANIC WASTE PRODUCT PROCUREMENT POLICY
SECTION 1. PURPOSE
It is the policy of the City of Anderson ("City"), applicable to all departments and divisions, to incorporate environmental considerations including recycled-content and recovered Organic Waste product use into purchasing practices and procurement. This Recovered Organic Waste Product Procurement Policy (Policy) will help the City to:

1. Protect and conserve natural resources, water, and energy;

2. Minimize the Jurisdiction's contribution to pollution and solid waste disposal; and,

3. Comply with State requirements as contained in 14 CCR Division 7, Chapter 12, Article 12 (SB 1383 procurement regulations) to procure a specified amount of Recovered Organic Waste Products to support Organic Waste disposal reduction targets and markets for products made from recycled and recovered Organic Waste materials, and to purchase Recycled-Content Paper Products and Recycled-Content Printing and Writing Paper.

SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS
A. "Annual Recovered Organic Waste Product Procurement Target" means the amount of Organic Waste in the form of a Recovered Organic Waste Product that the Jurisdiction is required to procure annually under 14 CCR Section 18993.1. This target shall be calculated by multiplying the per capita procurement target, which shall be 0.08 tons of Organic Waste per California resident per year, times the Jurisdiction's residential population using the most recent annual data reported by the California Department of Finance. Annually, CalRecycle will provide notice to each Jurisdiction of its Annual Recovered Organic Waste Product Procurement Target by posting such information on CalRecycle's website and providing written notice directly to the Jurisdiction.

B. "Compost" means the product resulting from the controlled biological decomposition of organic solid wastes that are source separated from the municipal solid waste stream or which are separated at a centralized facility or as otherwise defined in 14 CCR Section 17896.Z(a)( 4).

Compost eligible for meeting the Annual Recovered Organic Waste Product Procurement Target must be produced at a compostable material handling operation or facility permitted or authorized under 14 CCR Chapter 3.1 of Division 7 or produced at a large volume in-vessel digestion facility that composts on-site as defined and permitted under 14 CCR Chapter 3.2 of Division 7. Compost shall meet the State's composting operations regulatory requirements. t i Page

CITY OF ANDERSON EXHIBIT A

RECOVERED ORGANIC WASTE PRODUCT PROCUREMENT POLICY
C. "Direct Service Provider" means a person, company, agency, district, or other entity that provides a service or services to Jurisdiction pursuant to a contract or other written agreement or as otherwise defined in 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(l 7).

D. "Electricity Procured from Biomass Conversion" means electricity generated from biomass facilities that convert recovered Organic Waste, such as wood and prunings from the municipal stream, into electricity. Electricity procured from a biomass conversion facility may only count toward the Jurisdiction's Annual Recovered Organic Waste Product Procurement Target if the facility receives feedstock directly from certain permitted or authorized compostable material handling operations or facilities, transfer/processing operations or facilities, or landfills, as described in 14 CCR Section 18993.l(i).

E. "Jurisdiction" means the CITY OF ANDERSON, CALIFORNIA.

F. "Organic Waste" means solid wastes containing material originated from living organisms and their metabolic waste products including, but not limited to, food, yard trimmings, organic textiles and carpets, lumber, wood, Paper Products, Printing and Writing Paper, manure, biosolids, digestate, and sludges, or as otherwise defined in 14 CCR Section 18982(a)( 46). Biosolids and digestate are as defined in 14 CCR Section 18982(a)( 4) and 14 CCR Section 18982(a) (16.5), respectively.

G. "Paper Products" include, but are not limited to, paper janitorial supplies, cartons, wrapping, packaging, file folders, hanging files, corrugated boxes, tissue, and toweling; or as otherwise defined in 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(51).

H. "Printing and Writing Papers" include, but are not limited to, copy, xerographic, watermark, cotton fiber, offset, forms, computer printout paper, white wove envelopes, manila envelopes, book paper, note pads, writing tablets, newsprint, and other uncoated writing papers, posters, index cards, calendars, brochures, reports, magazines, and publications; or as otherwise defined in 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(54).

I. "Procurement of Recovered Organic Waste Products" shall mean purchase or acquisition (e.g., free delivery or free distribution from a hauler or other entity via a written agreement or contract), and end use by the Jurisdiction or others. The Jurisdiction's Annual Recovered Organic Waste Product Procurement Target can be fulfilled directly by the Jurisdiction or by Direct Service Providers through written contracts or agreements for Procurement of Recovered Organic Waste Products at the Jurisdiction's behest.

J. "Publicly-Owned Treatment Works" or "POTW" has the same meaning as in Section 403.3(r) of Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

K. "Recovered Organic Waste Products" means products made from California, landfilldiverted recovered Organic Waste processed at a permitted or otherwise authorized operation or facility, or as otherwise defined in 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(60). 21 Page

CITY OF ANDERSON EXHIBIT A

RECOVERED ORGANIC WASTE PRODUCT PROCUREMENT POLICY
Products that can be used to meet the Annual Recovered Organic Waste Product Procurement Target shall include Compost, SB 1383 Eligible Mulch, Renewable Gas from an in-vessel digestion facility, and Electricity Procured from Biomass Conversion as described herein and provided that such products meet requirements of 14 CCR, Division 7, Chapter 12, Article 12.

L. "Recordkeeping Designee" means a Tehama County Solid Waste Management Agency employee or any employee appointed by the Jurisdiction or their designee to track procurement and maintain records of Recovered Organic Waste Product procurement efforts both by the Jurisdiction and others, if applicable, as required by 14 CCR, Division 7, Chapter 12, Articles 12 and 13.

M. "Recyclability" means that the Paper Products and Printing and Writing Paper offered or sold to the Jurisdiction are eligible to be labeled with an unqualified recyclable label as defined in 16 Code of Federal Regulations Section 260.12 (2013).

N. "Recycled-Content Paper Products and Recycled-Content Printing and Writing Paper" means such products that consist of at least thirty percent (30%), by fiber weight, postconsumer fiber, consistent with the requirements of Sections 22150 to 22154 and Sections 12200 and 12209 of the Public Contract Code, and as amended.

0. "Renewable Gas" means gas derived from Organic Waste that has been diverted from a landfill and processed at an in-vessel digestion facility that is permitted or otherwise authorized by 14 CCR to recover Organic Waste, or as otherwise defined in 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(62).

P. "SB 1383" means Senate Bill 1383 of 2016 approved by the Governor on September 19, 2016, which added Sections 39730.5, 39730.6, 39730.7, and 39730.8 to the Health and Safety Code, and added Chapter 13.1 ( commencing with Section 42652) to Part 3 of Division 30 of the Public Resources Code, establishing methane emissions reduction targets in a statewide effort to reduce emissions of short-lived climate pollutants, as amended, supplemented, superseded, and replaced from time to time.

Q. "SB 1383 Regulations" or "SB 1383 Regulatory" means or refers to, for the purposes of this policy, the Short-Lived Climate Pollutants (SLCP): Organic Waste Reductions regulations developed by CalRecycle and adopted in 2020 that created Chapter 12 of 14 CCR, Division 7 and amended portions ofregulations of 14 CCR and 27 CCR.

R. "SB 1383 Eligible Mulch" means mulch eligible to meet the Annual Recovered Organic Waste Product Procurement Target, pursuant to 14 CCR Chapter 12 of Division 7. This SB 1383 Eligible Mulch shall meet the following conditions for the duration of the applicable procurement compliance year, as specified by 14 CCR Section 18993.1(t)(4):

1. Produced at one of the following facilities:
i. A compostable material handling operation or facility as defined in 14 3I Page

CITY OF ANDERSON EXHIBIT A

RECOVERED ORGANIC WASTE PRODUCT PROCUREMENT POLICY
CCR Section 17852(a)(12), that is permitted or authorized under 14 CCR Division 7, other than a chipping and grinding operation or facility as defined in 14 CCR Section 17852(a)(10);
ii. A transfer /processing facility or transfer /processing operation as defined in 14 CCR Sections 17402(a)(30) and (31), respectively, that is permitted or authorized under 14 CCR Division 7; or,
iii. A solid waste landfill as defined in Public Resources Code Section 40195.1 that is permitted under 27 CCR Division 2.

2. Meet or exceed the physical contamination, maximum metal concentration, and pathogen density standards for land application specified in 14 CCR Sections 17852(a) (24.5) (A)l through 3. In order for mulch to qualify as a Recovered Organic Waste Product toward the Jurisdiction's Annual Recovered Organic Waste Procurement Target, 14 CCR Section 18993.1 requires that the Jurisdiction adopt an ordinance or similarly enforceable mechanism to require compliance with land applications specifications.

S. "State" means the State of California.

SECTION 3. RECOVERED ORGANIC WASTE PRODUCT PROCUREMENT

3.1 Procurement Target
A. Beginning January 1, 2022, the Jurisdiction will annually procure for use or giveaway a quantity of Recovered Organic Waste Products that meets or exceeds its Annual Recovered Organic Waste Product Procurement Target through the implementation of Sections 3 through 5 of this Policy.

B. To be eligible to meet the Annual Recovered Organic Waste Product Procurement Target, products that may be procured include the following (provided that each product meets the criteria included in their respective definition in Section 2 of this Policy):

1. SB 1383 eligible Compost (as defined in Section 2.8).

2. SB 1383 Eligible Mulch (as defined in Section 2.R).

3. Renewable Gas (in the form of transportation fuel, electricity, or heat) (as defined in Section 2.0).

4. Electricity Procured from Biomass Conversion (as defined in Section 2.D). 41 Page

CITY OF ANDERSON EXHIBIT A

RECOVERED ORGANIC WASTE PRODUCT PROCUREMENT POLICY
SECTION 3.2. REQUIREMENTS FOR JURISDICTION DEPARTMENTS
A. Compost and SB 1383 Eligible Mulch procurement. Beginning January 1, 2027, departments responsible for landscaping maintenance, renovation, or construction shall:

1. Use Compost and SB 1383 Eligible Mulch produced from recovered Organic Waste, as defined in Section 2.B and 2.R of this Policy, for landscaping maintenance, renovation, or construction, as practicable, whenever available, and capable of meeting quality standards and criteria specified. SB 1383 Eligible Mulch used for land application must meet or exceed the physical contamination, maximum metal concentration and pathogen density standards specified in 14 CCR Section 17852(a) (24.5) (A)(l) through (3).

2. When Jurisdiction uses Compost and SB 1383 Eligible Mulch and the applications are subject to the Jurisdiction's Water Efficient Landscaping Ordinance (WELO), it must comply with one of the following: (i) the Jurisdiction's WELO, if more stringent than the State's Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO), or (ii) Sections 492.6 (a)(3)(B), (C), (D), and (G) of the State's Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, Title 23, Division 2, Chapter 2.7 of the CCR, as amended September 15, 2015, which requires the submittal of a landscape design plan with a "Soil Preparation, Mulch, and Amendments Section" to include the following:
a. For landscape installations, Compost at a rate of a minimum of 4 cubic yards per 1,000 square feet of permeable area shall be incorporated to a depth of six ( 6) inches into the soil. Soils with greater than six percent (6%) organic matter in the top six (6) inches of soil are exempt from adding Compost and tilling.
b. Apply a minimum three- (3-) inch layer of mulch on all exposed soil surfaces of planting areas except in turf areas, creeping or rooting groundcovers, or direct seeding applications where mulch is contraindicated. To provide habitat for beneficial insects and other wildlife, leave up to five percent (5%) of the landscape area without mulch. Designated insect habitat must be included in the landscape design plan as such.
c. Procure organic mulch materials made from recycled or postconsumer materials rather than inorganic materials or virgin forest products unless the recycled post-consumer organic products are not locally available. Organic mulches are not required where prohibited by local Fuel Modification Plan Guidelines or other applicable local ordinances.

SI Page

CITY OF ANDERSON EXHIBIT A

RECOVERED ORGANIC WASTE PRODUCT PROCUREMENT POLICY
d. For all mulch that is land applied, procure SB 1383 Eligible Mulch that meets or exceeds the physical contamination, maximum metal concentration, and pathogen density standards for land applications specified in 14 CCR Section 17852(a) (24.5) (A)(l) through (3).

3. Keep records, including invoices or proof of Recovered Organic Waste Product procurement (either through purchase or acquisition), and submit records to the Recordkeeping Designee, within 30 days.

Records shall include:
a. General procurement records, including:
(i) General description of how and where the product was used and applied, if applicable;
(ii) Source of product, including name, physical location, and contact information for each entity, operation, or facility from whom the Recovered Organic Waste Products were procured; (iii) Type of product;
(iv) Quantity of each product; and,
(v) Invoice or other record demonstrating purchase or
procurement.
b. For Compost and SB 1383 Eligible Mulch provided to residents through giveaway events or other types of distribution methods, keep records of the Compost and SB 1383 Eligible Mulch provided to residents.

Records shall be maintained and submitted to the Recordkeeping Designee in accordance with the requirements specified in Section

3.2.A.3 within 30 days.
c. For procurement of SB 1383 Eligible Mulch, maintain an updated copy of the ordinance or enforceable mechanism( s) requiring that the mulch procured by the Jurisdiction or Direct Service Provider meets the land application standards specified in 14 CCR Section 18993.1, as it may be amended from time to time.

4. When Procurement of Recovered Organic Waste Products occurs through a Direct Service Provider, enter into a written contract or agreement or execute a purchase order with enforceable provisions that includes: (i) definitions and specifications for SB 1383 Eligible Mulch in accordance with this Policy; and (ii) an enforcement mechanism (e.g., termination, liquidated damages) in the event the Direct Service Provider is not compliant with the requirements. 6I Page

CITY OF ANDERSON EXHIBIT A

RECOVERED ORGANIC WASTE PRODUCT PROCUREMENT POLICY
B. Renewable Gas procurement (used for fuel for transportation, electricity, or heating applications). For Renewable Gas procurement, Jurisdiction shall:

1. Procure Renewable Gas made from recovered Organic Waste for transportation fuel, electricity, and heating applications to the degree that it is appropriate and available for the Jurisdiction and to help meet the Annual Recovered Organic Waste Product Procurement Target, which requires compliance with criteria specified in 14 CCR Section 18993.1.

2. Keep records in the same manner indicated in Section 3.2.A.3 for the amount of Renewable Gas procured and used by the Jurisdiction, including the general procurement record information specified in Section 3.2.A.3.a, and submit records to the Recordkeeping Designee on a monthly basis by the 15th of the following month. Jurisdiction shall additionally obtain the documentation and submit records specified in Section 3.2.B.3 below to the Recordkeeping Designee.

3. If the Jurisdiction procures Renewable Gas from a POTW, a. Annually verify that the Renewable Gas from the POTW complies with the requirements specified in 14 CCR Section 18993.l(h), including, but not limited to the exclusion in 14 CCR Section 17896.6(a)(l) and the items listed in this Section 3.2.B.3.
b. Annually receive a record from the POTW documenting the tons of Organic Waste received by the POTW from: (i) a compostable material handling operation or facility as defined in 14 CCR Section 17852(a)(12), other than a chipping and grinding operation or facility as defined in 14 CCR Section 17852(a)(10), that is permitted or authorized under 14 CCR Division 7; (ii) transfer/processing facility or transfer/processing operation as defined in 14 CCR Sections 17402(a)(30) and (31), respectively, that is permitted or authorized under 14 CCR Division 7; or (iii) a solid waste landfill as defined in Public Resources Code Section 40195.1 that is permitted under 27 CCR Division 2.
c. Annually receive documentation from the POTW of the percentage of biosolids that the POTW produced and transported to activities that constitute landfill disposal in order to demonstrate that the POTW transported less than twenty-five percent (25%) of the biosolids it produced to activities that constitute landfill disposal. For the purposes of this Policy, landfill disposal is defined pursuant to 14 CCR Section 18983.l(a) and includes final disposition at a landfill; use of material as alternative daily cover or alternative intermediate cover at a landfill, and other dispositions not listed in 14 CCR Section 18983.l(b).

Alternative daily cover or alternative intermediate cover are defined in 71 Page

CITY OF ANDERSON EXHIBIT A

RECOVERED ORGANIC WASTE PRODUCT PROCUREMENT POLICY
27 CCR Sections 20690 and 20700, respectively.
d. Annually receive documentation that the POTW receives vehicletransported solid waste that is an anaerobically digestible material for the purpose of anaerobic co-digestion with POTW treatment plant wastewater to demonstrate that the POTW meets the requirement of 14 CCR Section 18993.l(h)(Z).
e. Jurisdiction shall submit these records to the Recordkeeping Designee by March 15 for the proceeding calendar year.

C. Electricity Procured from Biomass Conversion. For Electricity Procured from Biomass Conversion, Jurisdiction shall:

1. Procure electricity from a biomass conversion facility that receives feedstock from a composting facility, transfer /processing facility, a solid waste landfill, and/or receives feedstock from the generator or employees on behalf of the generator of the Organic Waste and to the degree that it is available and practicable for the Jurisdiction and to help meet the Annual Recovered Organic Waste Product Procurement Target, which requires compliance with criteria specified in 14 CCR Section 18993.1.

2. Maintain records and conduct the following recordkeeping activities:
a.
b.

SECTION 3.3.

Keep records in the same manner indicated in Section 3.2.A.3 of this Policy for the amount of Electricity Procured from Biomass Conversion facilities, including the general procurement record information specified in Section 3.2.A.3.a.

Receive written notification by an authorized representative of the biomass conversion facility certifying that biomass feedstock was received from a permitted solid waste facility identified in 14 CCR Section 18993.l(i).

Provide these records to the Recordkeeping Designee.

REQUIREMENTS FOR DIRECT SERVICE PROVIDERS
A. Direct Service Providers of landscaping maintenance, renovation, and construction shall:

1. Use Compost and SB 1383 Eligible Mulch, as practicable, produced from recovered Organic Waste, as defined in Section 2.8 and 2.R of this Policy, for all landscaping renovations, construction, or maintenance performed for the Jurisdiction, whenever available, and capable of meeting quality standards and Bl Page

CITY OF ANDERSON EXHIBIT A

RECOVERED ORGANIC WASTE PRODUCT PROCUREMENT POLICY
criteria specified. SB 1383 Eligible Mulch used for land application shall comply with 14 CCR, Division 7, Chapter 12, Article 12 and must meet or exceed the physical contamination, maximum metal concentration and pathogen density standards specified in 14 CCR Section 17852(a) (24.5) (A)(l) through (3).

2. If Direct Service Provider is subject to the Jurisdiction's WELO, it must comply with one of the following, whichever is more stringent: (i) the locally-adopted WELO that is more stringent than the State's MWELO, or (ii) Sections 492.6 (a)(3)(B), (C), (D), and (G) of the State's MWELO, Title 23, Division 2, Chapter

2.7 of the CCR, as amended September 15, 2015, which requires the submittal of a landscape design plan with a "Soil Preparation, Mulch, and Amendments Section" to include the following:
a. For landscape installations, Compost at a rate of a minimum of 4 cubic yards per 1,000 square feet of permeable area shall be incorporated to a depth of six (6) inches into the soil. Soils with greater than six percent (6%) organic matter in the top six (6) inches of soil are exempt from adding Compost and tilling.
b. Apply a minimum three- (3-) inch layer of mulch on all exposed soil surfaces of planting areas except in turf areas, creeping or rooting groundcovers, or direct seeding applications where mulch is contraindicated. To provide habitat for beneficial insects and other wildlife, leave up to five percent (5%) of the landscape area without mulch. Designated insect habitat must be included in the landscape design plan as such.
c. Procure organic mulch materials made from recycled or postconsumer materials rather than inorganic materials or virgin forest products unless the recycled post-consumer organic products are not locally available. Organic mulches are not required where prohibited by local Fuel Modification Plan Guidelines or other applicable local ordinances.
d. For all mulch that is land applied, procure SB 1383 Eligible Mulch that meets or exceeds the physical contamination, maximum metal concentration, and pathogen density standards for land applications specified in 14 CCR Section 17852(a) (24.5) (A)(l) through (3).

3. Keep and provide records of Procurement of Recovered Organic Waste Products ( either through purchase or acquisition) to Recordkeeping Designee.

Information to be provided shall include:
a. General description of how and where the product was used and if applicable, applied;
9I Page

CITY OF ANDERSON EXHIBIT A

RECOVERED ORGANIC WASTE PRODUCT PROCUREMENT POLICY
b. Source of product, including name, physical location, and contact information for each entity, operation, or facility from whom the Recovered Organic Waste Products were procured;
c. Type of product;
d. Quantity of each product; and,
e. Invoice or other record demonstrating purchase or procurement.

B. Direct Service Provider of Organic Waste collection services shall:

1. Keep and provide records to the Jurisdiction including the following:
a. Dates provided;
b. Source of product including name, physical location and contact information for each entity, operation or facility from whom the Recovered Organic Waste Products were procured;
c. Type of product;
d. Quantity provided; and,
e. Invoice or other record or documentation demonstrating purchase, procurement, or transfer of material to giveaway location.

C. Renewable Gas procurement by Direct Service Providers

1.. If Renewable Gas made from recovered Organic Waste is used by Direct Service Providers, Direct Service Providers shall submit information listed in Section 3.3.B.2.a-e on a schedule to be determined by Jurisdiction, but not less than annually to the Recordkeeping Designee.

2. Renewable Gas used by Direct Service Providers under Sections 3.3.A and

3.3.8 shall comply with criteria specified in 14 CCR Section 18993.1.

SECTION 4. RECYCLED-CONTENT PAPER PROCUREMENT

4.1 Requirements for Jurisdiction Departments
A. Effective January 1, 2022, if fitness and quality of Recycled-Content Paper Products and Recycled-Content Printing and Writing Paper are equal to that of non-recycled items, all departments and divisions of Jurisdiction shall purchase Recycled-Content Paper Products and Recycled-Content Printing and Writing Paper that consists of at least thirty percent (30%), by fiber weight, postconsumer fiber, whenever available 10 IP age

CITY OF ANDERSON EXHIBIT A

RECOVERED ORGANIC WASTE PRODUCT PROCUREMENT POLICY
at the same or a lesser total cost than non-recycled items, consistent with the requirements of the Public Contracts Code, Sections 22150 through 22154 and Sections 12200 and 12209, as amended.

B. All Paper Products and Printing and Writing Paper shall be eligible to be labeled with an unqualified recyclable label as defined in Title 16 Code of Federal Regulations Section 260.12 (2013).

C. Provide records to the Recordkeeping Designee of all Paper Products and Printing and Writing Paper purchases within thirty (30) days of the purchase (both recycledcontent and non-recycled content, if any is purchased) made by a division or department or employee of the Jurisdiction. Records shall include a copy of the invoice or other documentation of purchase, written certifications as required in Section 4.2.A.3-4 for recycled-content purchases, vendor name, purchaser name, quantity purchased, date purchased, and recycled content (including products that contain none), and if non-Recycled-Content Paper Products and/or non-RecycledContent Printing and Writing Paper are provided, include a description of why Recycled-Content Paper Products and/or Recycled-Content Printing and Writing Paper were not provided, including supporting documentation.

4.2 Requirements for Vendors
A. All vendors that provide Paper Products (including janitorial Paper Products) and Printing and Writing Paper to Jurisdiction shall:

1. Provide Recycled-Content Paper Products and Recycled-Content Printing and Writing Paper that consists of at least thirty percent (30%), by fiber weight, postconsumer fiber, if fitness and quality are equal to that of non-recycled item, and available at equal or lesser price.

2. Only provide Paper Products and Printing and Writing Papers that meet Federal Trade Commission Recyclability standard as defined in Title 16 Code of Federal Regulations Section 260.12 (2013).

3. Certify in writing, under penalty of perjury, the minimum percentage of postconsumer material in the Paper Products and Printing and Writing Paper offered or sold to the Jurisdiction. This certification requirement may be waived if the percentage of postconsumer material in the Paper Products, Printing and Writing Paper, or both can be verified by a product label, catalog, invoice, or a manufacturer or vendor internet website.

4. Certify in writing, under penalty of perjury, that the Paper Products and Printing and Writing Paper offered or sold to the Jurisdiction is eligible to be labeled with an unqualified recyclable label as defined in Title 16 Code of Federal Regulations Section 260.12 (2013).

5. Provide records to the Recordkeeping Designee of all Paper Products and 11 I Pa g e

CITY OF ANDERSON EXHIBIT A

RECOVERED ORGANIC WASTE PRODUCT PROCUREMENT POLICY
Printing and Writing Paper purchased from the vendor within thirty (30) days of the purchase (both recycled-content and non-recycled content, if any is purchased) made by a division or department or employee of the Jurisdiction.

Records shall include a copy of the invoice or other documentation of purchase, written certifications as required in Section 4.2.A.3-4 for recycledcontent purchases, purchaser name, quantity purchased, date purchased, and recycled content (including products that contain none), and if non-RecycledContent Paper Products and/or non- Recycled-Content Printing and Writing Paper are provided, include a description of why Recycled-Content Paper Products and/or Recycled-Content Printing and Writing Paper were not provided, including supporting documentation.

B. All vendors providing printing services to the Jurisdiction via a printing contract or written agreement. shall use Printing and Writing Paper that consists of at least thirty percent (30%). by fiber weight, postconsumer fiber, or as amended by Public Contract Code Section 12209.

SECTION 5. RECORDKEEPING RESPONSIBILITIES
A The Tehama County Solid Waste Management Agency, a regional agency, will be responsible and will select an employee to act as the Recordkeeping Designee that will be responsible for obtaining records pertaining to Procurement of Recovered Organic Waste Products and Recycled-Content Paper Products and Recycled-Content Printing and Writing Paper.

B. The Recordkeeping Designee will do the following to track Procurement of Recovered Organic Waste Products, Recycled-Content Paper Products, and Recycled-Content Printing and Writing Paper:

1. Collect and collate copies of invoices or receipts (electronic) or other proof of purchase that describe the procurement of Printing and Writing Paper and Paper Products, including the volume and type of all paper purchases; and, copies of certifications and other required verifications from all departments and/or divisions procuring Paper Products and Printing and Writing Paper (whether or not they contain recycled content) and/or from the vendors providing Printing and Writing Paper and Paper Products. These records must be kept as part of Jurisdiction's documentation of its compliance with 14 CCR Section 18993.3.

2. Collect and collate copies of invoices or receipts or documentation evidencing procurement from all departments and divisions procuring Recovered Organic Waste Products and invoices or similar records from vendors/contractors/others procuring Recovered Organic Waste Products on behalf of the Jurisdiction to develop evidence of Jurisdiction meeting its 12 I P a Be

CITY OF ANDERSON EXHIBIT A

RECOVERED ORGANIC WASTE PRODUCT PROCUREMENT POLICY
Annual Recovered Organic Waste Product Procurement Target. These records must be kept as part of the Jurisdiction's documentation of its compliance with 14 CCR Section 18993.1.

3. Collect, collate, and maintain documentation submitted by the Jurisdiction, Direct Service Providers, and/or vendors, including the information reported to the Recordkeeping Designee in accordance with Sections 3.2.A.3, 3.2.8.2,

3.2.C.2, 3.3.A.3, 3.3.B.2, 3.3.C.3, 4.1.C, and 4.2.A.5.

4. Compile an annual report on the Jurisdiction's direct procurement, and vendor/ other procurement on behalf of the Jurisdiction, of Recovered Organic Waste Products, Recycled-Content Paper Products, and Recycled-Content Printing and Writing Paper, consistent with the recordkeeping requirements contained in 14 CCR Section 18993.2 for the Annual Recovered Organic Waste Product Procurement Target and 14 CCR Section 18993.4 for RecycledContent Paper Products and Recycled-Content Printing and Writing Paper procurement. This report shall be made available to the Tehama County Solid Waste Management Agency, as the entity responsible for compiling the annual report to be submitted to CalRecycle (which will include a description of compliance on many other SB 1383 regulatory requirements) pursuant to 14 CCR Division 7, Chapter 12, Article 13. The procurement report shall also be shared with the City of Anderson City Council annually as evidence of implementing this Policy.

SECTION 6. EFFECTIVE DATE OF POLICY
This Policy shall go into effect no later than January 1, 2022. 13 IP age

AGENDA ITEM
I January 18, 2022 City Council Meeting
To:

From:

Honorable Mayor and Members of the Anderson City Council Jeff Kiser, City Manager
Date: January 18, 2022

I SUBJECT
Participate in the purchase of a Lenco Bearcat rescue vehicle with Shasta County and City of Shasta Lake

I RECOMMENDATION

1. Consider adopting a Resolution to participate in the purchase of a Lenco Bearcat rescue vehicle with Shasta County and City of Shasta Lake.

2. Direct the Finance Director to amend the 2021-2022 budget in the amount of $39,443.

I FISCAL IMPACT
The fiscal impact to the General Fund is$ $39,443.

I DISCUSSION
Shasta County has reached out to the City of Anderson and City of Shasta Lake to requested the Cities participation in purchasing the Lenco Bearcat rescue vehicle. The vehicle will be an additional asset to both cities and the County in providing increased safety to first responders while allowing them to effectively perform their duties.

The total cost for the Bearcat is $335,737.55. The City of Anderson's allocation of the cost is $39,443. The allocations were determined based upon population of the Cities and County.

ITEM 8.3 PAGE1 1/18/2022
The estimated completion time to build and deliver the vehicle is one (1) year. !ATTACHMENT

1. Proposed Resolution
ITEM 8.3 PAGE2 1/18/2022
RESOLUTION NO. 22-
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Anderson approving participation in the purchase of a Lenco Bearcat rescue vehicle with Shasta County and the City of Shasta Lake
WHEREAS, Shasta County purchasing a Lenco Bearcat rescue vehicle; and WHEREAS, Shasta County has requested participation from the City of Anderson and the City of Shasta Lake for the purchase of the Bearcat rescue vehicle; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Anderson hereby wishes to participate in the purchase of Lenco Bearcat rescue vehicle; and
WHEREAS. the City Council of the City of Anderson hereby wishes to amend the budget 2021-2022 fiscal year.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Anderson agrees to participate in the purchase of the Lenco Bearcat rescue vehicle and amend the 2021-2022 fiscal budget as follows:

Account Description Current Proposed Change
001-3126-5730.000 Machinery and Equipment - $39,443 $39,443 PASSED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Anderson, on this 18th day of January 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Baron Browning, Mayor
ATTEST:

Christy White, City Clerk
AGENDA ITEM ~anuary 18, 2022 City Council Meetingi
Approved for Submittal By:
•
Matthew Baker, Engineering Services Manager
To:

Through:

Honorable Mayor and Members of the Anderson City Council Jeff Kiser, City Manager
From:

Date:
!SUBJECT
Matthew Baker, Engineering Services Manager
January 18, 2022
Local Road Safety Plan for the City of Anderson
!RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that council:
t. Receive a presentation by staff and GHD.

2. Consider adoption of a resolution adopting the Draft Local Road Safety Plan for the City of Anderson.

I FISCAL IMPACT
The work to develop the Local Road Safety Plan is funded by a grant from the California Department of Transportation in the amount of $40,000.

ITEM 8.9a PAGE1 01/18/2022
I DISCUSSION and BACKGROUND
Background:

In March 2021, the City of Anderson was awarded a Local Road Safety Plan Grant (Grant) from the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to create a Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP) for the purpose of complying with new state and federal requirements related to the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP). The proposed Local Road Safety Plan shall identify key safety activities and projects to ensure a safe public transportation system for all modes. The countermeasures and recommendations will include the "S E's" of highway safety- engineering, enforcement, education, emergency response, and emerging technologies.

Quality safety data is the foundation of the HSIP planning process. State, regional, and local agencies analyze this data to identify potential locations for systemic safety improvements, conduct engineering studies, and prioritize roadway safety improvement projects for implementation. On March 22, 2021, the City retained GHD, Inc, to develop the City's Local Road Safety Plan. GHD applied a systematic approach which included a City-wide analysis of the roadway system in Anderson comprising of the current collisions patterns and high-risk roadway characteristics with a goal to identify safety countermeasures to help mitigate the City's primary crash type trends and reduce overall collision severity.

Discussion:

A project website was created https;//Jrsg.mys,ocfalpinpointcom/anderson to host a survey and interactive map, as community outreach was an important part of the LRSP development. The past five (5) complete years of collisions (2015-2019) were collected and evaluated for the City roadways. Collision data for 2020 was separated from the 5-year analysis due to potential COVID19 induced travel pattern impact.

Following the data collection and analysis, there were two virtual stakeholder working group meetings. Stakeholders included City staff, Anderson Fire Protection District, Anderson Police Department, Shasta County Public Works, Caltrans, Shasta Regional Transportation Agency, Shasta Living Streets, and Shasta County Health and Human Services. On May 27, 2021 the stakeholder group discussed the LRSP process, ideas for the LRSP visions, goals, and priorities, and reviewed the data collection and analysis. On September 14, 2021, the group met to discuss public comments and concerns, and safety measures and projects.

Based on the collision data analysis and the stakeholder working group input, the LRSP addresses multiple Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) Challenge Areas such as pedestrians, bicyclists, distracted driving, intersections, and aggressive driving. The LRSP provides a list of countermeasures for priority intersections and roadways segments based on collision analysis and the feedback from the City, stakeholders, and public. The non-engineering strategies were also developed through stakeholder engagement. The engineering countermeasures in the plan coincide with HSIP funding. Tables 1 and 2 below list the top five intersection and road segment locations identified through the data analysis and the suggested countermeasures that may be applied to those locations. Table 3 is a general list of recommended non-engineering strategies that may be applied throughout the City.

ITEM 8.9a PAGE2 1/18/2022
TABLE 1: Highest Ranking Priority Intersections and Recommended Countermeasures lntcl'sect1on I Reconiinenclcd Countermeasures C11y Junsd1ct,011
Add lnteisectlon lighting
Stingy Ln I Balls Install raised median on approaches
Ferry Rd Install/upgrade pedestrian crossing at uncootrolled locations (with enhanced safely leatures) Increase DUI enfon:ement at ni ht
lmprow signal han!wara: lenses, back1)1ates with retroo!lectiw borders, mounting, size. and number Pleasant HIiis Dr I Install raised palo8fflent mmen. and striping guldamarks for the westbound left tum through the lnt=ectlon Rhonda Rd Install "SIGNAL AHEAD" wamlng signs (W3-3) on approaches to lnten.ection Mow back stop bar on Rhonda Rd to be In line w!lh existing median lmprow pawment markings on approaches to stri out addHlonal pa,ement Comer Way (West) 1 Install/upgrade larger« addHional st~ signs or other Intersection wamlnglreguato,y s igns Dnchutes Rd lmprow pawmert tictlon (High FrictlOll SLriace Treatments) Install raised median on a ches
Install/upgrade la,ger or additional stop signs or other Intersection warnlng/reguato,y signs North St I Upgrade Intersection pa1e111ent markings
Ravenwood Ln Consolidate uncontrolled crossings to the north leg Upgrade pedestrian crossing at uncontrolled locatlon and Install RRFBs Install "CROSS TRAFFIC DOES NOT STOP" supplementa waml pt ue (W4-4P) below st sl non mlAOf road a E"8iuate Installing signals (must meet CA MUTCD wwrants), OR Corwert Intersection to roundabout (from all way stop), OR Install/upgrade larger« additional stop signs or other Intersection wamlng/reguato,y stgns North St I Eaat St Install raised median on approaches
Upgrade Intersection palelTlent markings
Install/upgrade pedestrian crossing at uncontrolled locations (with enhanced safely leatures) E"8iuate reducl a h lanes on North Street
Install/upgrade larger« additional stop signs « Olher Intersection wamlng/reguato,y signs North St I Sliva r St Upgrade lnleisectlon palefllent markings Increase enforcement at lnteisectlon, OR
Eleluate con'A!Slon to all-wa STOP control must meet CA MUTCD ~11,s tmprow slgnat hardware: lenses, mounting. size, and number lmprow signet timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, « operation) SR 273 / Bruce St Install raised pa1et11ent ma.1ters and striping (through Intersection) Modify signal phasing to Implement a Leading Pedestrian lntenial (LPI} Consider lnstalll curb on Intersection comers to s rate estrian and \ehlcle ri ht~-wa E..aluate Installing signals (must meet CA MUTCD -,,,.11ts), OR SR 2731 Marx Way lnstalVupgrade larger or addltlonal stop signs or other Intersection warnlng/reguat«y signs Create directional median openings to allow (and restrict) left-turns and u- turns , OR Install acceleration lane b' westbound tett-tuml lehlcles lmJ)l'Ole signal hardware: lenses, mounting, size, and number SR 273 1 South St lmprow signal timing (coordination. phases, red, yellow, or operation) Install raised median on approaches
Modi s nal I to Im ement a Leadi Pedestrian lntenel LPI lmprow slgnal hardware: lenses, mounting, size, and number SR 273 / Ox Yoke Rd lmprow signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Install advance st bar bebre crosswalk B cle Box
lmprow signal hant.Yare: lenses, mounting, size, and number lmprow signal timing (coordination, phases. red, yellow, or operation) SR 273 / North St Install raised median on approaches
Install adlence stop bar bel:>nl crosswalk (Blcycle Box) Install "LEFT ON GREEN ARROW ONLY" sign (R10-15) on signal mast Install "SIGNAL AHEAD" sl ns 3-3 on s hes to lnter..ectlon SR 273 I Pleasant lmprow signal han:lwate: lenses, mounting, size, and number HIiia Dr lmprow slgnal timing (coordination, phases, red. yellow, « operation) "'** See Next Page "'**
ITEM 8.9a PAGE3 1/18/2022
TABLE 2: Highest Ranking Priority Segments and Recommended Countermeasures Segment / Recommended Countermeasures
City Jurisdiction
Riverside Ave (1-5 NB
Ramps to North Rd)
Olinda Rd (City Boundary
to Emily Rd)
Install curve adwnce wamlng signs
Install delineators, reflectors and/or object markers
Additional DUI enforcement
Install Median Barrier
lmprow pawment friction (High Friction Surface Treatments) Install curve adwnce warning signs
Install delineators, reflectors and/or object markers
Install pedestrian median fencing on approaches
Install bike lanes
Rhonda Rd (Pleasant HIiis Install cu~ advance warning signs Rd to South of Pleasant Install dynamic/variable speed warning signs Balls Fe Rd (South St to Install cl~r signage near elementary school to guide vehicles during school drop off/pick up i St Widen bike lanes oyon ) Partner with school for Safe Routes to School project Add segment lighting
S Balls Ferry Rd (Balls Widen shoulder
Ferry Rd to Davey Way) lmprow pavement friction (High Friction Surface Treatments) Install dynamic/wriable speed warning signs
Ca/trans Jurisdiction
SR 273 (South Stto
Pleasant HIiis Dr)
SR 273 (City Boundary to
Hayes St)
Type
Education I '
Add segment lighting
Remove or relocate fixed objects outside of aear Recowry Zone Install edgeline rumble strips/stripes
Install pedestrian median fencing on approaches
Install sidewalk/pathway (to a\Old walking along roadway) Add segment lighting
Install dellneators, reflectors and/or object markers
Install raised pavement markings on existing edgeline striping Close ap In center median north of Bri s St
TABLE 3: Recommended Non-Engineering Strategies
I Strategy
Pedestrian education campaign
Bicyclist education and resources
Safe Routes to School maps and outreach at schools
Social media blasts with quick education tool for all usera Dangers of speeding/speed management campaigns
Driwr education through distracted driling campaigns
lnwst in a record keeping program to help create a comprehensiw collision database ITS Infrastructure, 'Neb/mobile application (apps) and smart cities practices Crash warning system
Emerging Technologies Changeable message signs
Bicycle detection
Upgraded controllers for flashing yellow arrows and leading pedestrian lnt81\0ls Installing touchless Accessible Pedestrian Signals -- Targeted speed enforcement Enforcement Focused DUI check points or routine stops
Increasing number of traffic enforcement officers
Distracted driling enforcement - Emergency preemption at signalized Intersections Emergency Reepon• Ability to administer life sa\-ing measures on-site of a collision Disaster preparedness plan
The Draft LRSP was posted on the project website for public comment and emailed to stakeholders. No public or stakeholder comments were received. '•'
ITEM 8.9a PAGE4 1/18/2022
!ATTACHMENT

1. Resolution

2. Draft Local Road Safety Plan

3. Draft LRSP Appendices
ITEM 8.9a PAGES 1/18/2022
RESOLUTION NO. 22-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDERSON

APPROVING THE LOCAL ROAD SAFETY PLAN
WHEREAS, a Professional Services Agreement was executed on March 1, 2021 with GHD, Inc, for development of the Local Road Safety Plan (Plan); and WHEREAS, the Plan is being created for the purpose of complying with new state and federal requirements related to the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP); and and
WHEREAS, the Local Road Safety Plan is a requirement for future HSIP grant applications; WHEREAS, the Plan has been developed through the coordinated efforts of City of Anderson staff and consultants, stakeholder working group meetings, and input from the public through a series of public on-line and virtual engagements and a public review period; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Anderson does hereby adopt the Anderson Local Road Safety Plan.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Anderson on this 18th day of January 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Baron Browning, Mayor
ATTEST:

Christy White, City Clerk
Local Road Safety
Plan
Draft Document
City of Anderson
January 18, 2022
-+ Walk safe. Ride safe. Drive safe.

Acknowledgements
A special thanks to all the Safety Partners that contributed to this plan.

City of Anderson
Mayor and Councilmembers
Public Works Department
Police Department
Fire Department
County of Shasta
Public Works Department
Health and Human Services
Caltrans, District 2
Shasta Regional Transportation Agency
Anderson Union High School
Cascade Union Elementary School District
Shasta Living Streets
Healthy Shasta Partnership
GHD I City of Anderson I 112258751 Local Road Safety Plan This document is in draft fonn. The contents, including any opinions, conclusions or recommendations contained in. or which may be implied from. this draft document must not be relied upon. GHD reserves the right, at any time. without notice. to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document. To the maximum extent pennitted by law. GHD disclaims any responsibility or liability arising from or in connection with this draft document.

Executive Summary
In 2020, the City of Anderson was awarded a state grant from Caltrans to perform a Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP). The LRSP is a requirement for Cycle 11 of the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP). The LRSP grant application included a citywide analysis of the roadway system in Anderson comprising of the current collisions patterns and high~risk roadway characteristics (systemic analysis). Furthermore, the Anderson's goal is to identify safety countermeasures to help mitigate the City's primary crash type trends and reduce the overall collision severity.

The LRSP is a collaborative process with a local leadership group that represents the 5 E's (not just engineering) and public outreach. The 5 E's of traffic safety include Engineering, Enforcement, Education, Emergency Services, and Emerging Technologies.

This holistic approach allows certain areas of concern not showing a crash pattern to be analyzed. Also, it fosters local, state, and agency partnerships to advance local road safety.

In following the overall LRSP process, a Stakeholder Working Group (Working Group) was formed with the City as the lead and local organizations from the 5 e·s and anyone with an interest in improving the City's roadway safety. This group gathered for meetings to discuss the overall collision analysis, goals, priorities, safety recommendations, and overall development of the safety plan.

Based on the past 5 years collision analysis and the City's Stakeholder Working Group Meetings, this LRSP will address multiple Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) Challenge/Emphasis Areas including but not limited to:

1. Bicyclists

2. Pedestrians

3. Intersections

4. Aggressive Driving/ Speeding

5. Distracted Driving
In addition, the vision, mission statement, and goals were established in guiding the development of the LRSP.

It was also decided that the LRSP for the City of Anderson would be a living document with official updated every five (5) years.

Data analysis, public input, and City feedback helped to determine the priority locations in the City. These locations, along with their proposed countermeasures, are shown in the tables below.

GHD I City of Anderson 111225875 I Local Road Safety Plan ii This document is in draft fonn. The contents, including any opinions. conclusions or recommendations contained in, or which may be implied from, this draft document must not be relied upon. GHD reserves the right, at any time, without notice, to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document. To the maximum extent permitted by law, GHD disclaims any responsibility or liability arising from or in connection with th s draft document.

Priority Intersections and Recommended Countermeasures
Intersection Recommended Countermeasures
c,iy Jur1sd1ction
Stingy Ln / Balls
Ferry Rd
Pleasant HIiis Dr/
Rhonda Rd
Comer Way (West)/
Deschutes Rd
North St/
Ravenwood Ln
North St/ East St
North St I Sliver St
Ca/trans Jurisdiction
Add intersection lighting
Install raised median on approaches
Install/upgrade pedestrian crossing at uncontrolled locations (with enhanced safety features) Increase DUI enforcement at night
lmprow signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreftectiw borders, mounting, size, and number Install raised pa\ement markers and striping guldemarks for the westbound left tum through the intersection
Install "SIGNAL AHEAD'' warning signs ~3-3) on approaches to Intersection Mo\e back stop bar on Rhonda Rd to be in line with existing median lmprow pawment markings on approaches to stripe out additional pawment Install/upgrade larger or additional stop sign~ or other intersection warning/regulatory signs lmprow pawment friction (High Friction Surface Treatments) Install raised median on approaches
Install/upgrade larger or additional stop slgns or other intersection warning/regulatory signs Upgrade Intersection pawment markings
Consolidate uncontrolled crossings to the north leg
Upgrade pedestrian crossing at uncontrolled location and install RRFBs Install "CROSS TRAFFIC DOES NOT STOP" supplementary warning plaque ~4-4P) below stop sign on minor road approaches
Evaluate Installing signals (must meet CA MUTCD Wilrrants) • OR Conwrt intersection to roundabout (trom all way stop), OR Install/upgrade larger or additional stop signs or other intersection warning/regulatory signs Install raised median on approaches
Upgrade intersection pawment markings
Install/upgrade pedestrian crossing at uncontrolled locations (with enhanced safety features) Evaluate reducing approach lanes on North Street
Install/upgrade larger or additional stop signs or other intersection warning/regulatory signs Upgrade Intersection pawment markings
Increase enforcement at Intersection, OR
Evaluate conwrsion to all-way STOP control (must meet CA MUTCD v.errants) Improve signal hardware: lenses. mounting, size. and number lmprow slgnal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) SR 273 / Bruce St Install raised pa\ement markers and striping (through intersection) Modify slgnal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian hterwl (LPQ Consider installing curb on intersection comers to separate pedestrian and whicle right-of.way Evalua!e installing signals (must meet CA MUTCD v.errants) , OR SR 273 1 Marx Way Install/upgrade larger or additional stop signs or other intersection warning/regulatory signs Cre._at~ directional median openings to allow (and restrict) left-tums and u- turns , OR Install acceleration lane for westbound left-turning 1.ehlcles lmprow signal hardware: lenses, mounting. size, and number SR 2731 South St lmprow signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Install raised median on approaches
Modify slgnal phasing to Implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) lmprow signal hardware: lenses. mounting, size. and number SR 273 / Ox Yoke Rd lmprow signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Install advance stop bar before crosswalk (Bicycle Box) lmprow signal hardware: lenses. mounti!lg, size, and number lmprow signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) SR 2731 North St Install raised median on approaches
Install advance stop bar before crosswalk (Bicycle Box) Install "LEFT ON GREEN ARROW ONLY" sign (R10-15) on signal mast Install "SIGNAL AHEAD" signs (W3-3) on approaches to intersection lmprow signal hardware: lenses. mounting, size. and number SR 2731 Factory Improve signal Urning (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Outlets Dr Upgrade Intersection pawment markings SR 273 / Pleasant lmprow slgnal hardware: lenses, mounting, size, and nl!mber HIiis Dr lmprow signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) GHD I City of Anderson I 11225875 I Local Road Safety Plan iii This document is in draft form. The contents, including any opinions, condustons or recommendations contained in, or which may be implied from, this draft document must not be relied upon. GHD reserves the right, at any time, without notice. to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document. To the maximum extent permitted by law, GHD disclaims any respons bility or liabil"ty arising from or in connection w ith this draft document.

Priority Segments and Recommended Countermeasures
Segment Recommended Countermeasures
City Jurisdiction
Riverside Ave (1-5 NB
Ramps to North Rd)
OHnda Rd (City Boundary
to Emily Rd)
lnstaU cur.e advance warning signs
Install delineators, reflectors and/or object markers
Additional DUI enforcement
lnstal Median Barrier
Improve pavement friction (High Friction Surface Treatments) lnstal cur.e advance warning signs
lnstal delineators, reflectors and/or object markers
lnstal pedestrian median fencing on approaches
lnstal bike lanes
Rhonda Rd (Pleasant Hills lnstaH cur.e advance warning signs Rd to South of Pleasant lnstaR dynamic/variable speed warning signs Balls Fer Rd (South St to ln~tan c~ar signage near elementary school to guide whicles during school drop off/pick up i St Widen bike lanes oyon ) Partner ....,;u, school for Safe Routes to School project Add segment ighting
S Balls Ferry Rd (Balls Widen shoulder
Ferry Rd to Davey Way)
SR 273 (South St to
Pleasant Hills Dr)
SR 273 (City Boundary to
Hayes St)
Add segment lighting
Remove or relocate fixed objects outside of Clear Recovery Zone Install edgeline rumble strips/stripes
Install pedestrian median fencing on approaches
Install sidewal</pathway (lo avoid wal<ing along roadway) Add segment lighting
Install detineators, reflectors andlor object markers
Install raised pavement markings on e>Gsting edgeline striping Close gap in center median norU'l of Br~gs St
It is important to understand the upcoming funding opportunities in the successful implementation of these safety projects. Most of the proposed countermeasures are HSIP fundable (next cycle 11 is scheduled to open in March/April 2022). However, countermeasures can be implemented through other funding sources to include:

Active Transportation Program (ATP)
• Next call for funding projects is scheduled to start in March 2022 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) program
Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant (Sustainable Communities) Stimulus funding sources
Capital Improvement Program or with on-going maintenance work GHD I City of Anderson 111225875 I Local Road Safety Plan iv This document is in draft fonn. The contents, including any opinions conclusions or recommendations contained in, or which may be implied from. this draft document must not be relied upon. GHO reserves the right, at any Ume, without notice. to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document. To the maximum extent pennitted by law. GHO disclaims any responsibility or liability arising from or in connection with this draft document.

Contents

1. lntrod uction 1

2. Background 2

2.1 Purpose and Need 2

2.1.1 City Roadways 2

2.2 Standards and Guidelines 3

2.2.1 California Strategic Highway Safety Plan 4

2.3 Methodology 4

3. Safety Partners/Stakeholders 6

3.1 Stakeholder Working Group Members 6

3.1.1 Stakeholder Working Group Meetings 6

3.2 SHSP Challenge Areas 7

3.3 Guiding Principles 7

3.3.1 Vision Zero 7

3.3.2 Safe Systems Approach 7

3.3.3 Vision, Mission Statement, and Goals 8

3.3.3.1 Vision 8

3.3.3.2 Mission Statement 8

3.3.3.3 Goals 9

3.3.4 Motto 9

4. Analyze Safety Data 10

4.1 Recent/Planned Safety Projects 10

4.1.1 SR 273 Multimodal Corridor Plan 10

4.1.2 Recently Completed Caltrans Projects 10

4.2 Collision Data 10

4.2.1 Collisions on City Roadways 13

4.2.2 Collisions on Caltrans Roadways 16

4.2.3 2020 Collisions 18

4.2.4 Collisions Related to Challenge/Emphasis Areas 20

4.2.4.1 Bicyclists 20

4.2.4,2 Pedestrians 23

4.2.4.3 Intersections 25

4.2.4.4 Aggressive Driving/ Speeding 25

4.2.4.5 Distracted Driving 25

4.3 Field Reconnaissance 25

5. Public Outreach 28

5.1 Public Website 28

5.1.1 Interactive Map 28

5.1.2 Public Survey 29

6. Identify Strategies 31

6.1 Engineering Strategies 31

6.1.1 Identified Challenge/Emphasis Areas 31

6.1.1.1 Access for Bicyclists and Pedestrians around SR 273 32 GHD I City of Anderson I 11225875 I Local Road Safety Plan v This document is in draft form. The contents, including any opinions, conclus!ons or recommendations contained in, or which may be implied from, this draft documant must not ba relied upon. GHD reserves the right, at any time, without notice, to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document To the maximum extent permitted by law. GHO disclaims any responsibil.ity or liability arising from or In connection with th's draft document.

6.1.1.2 Director's Policy 37 (DP-37)

6.1.2 Intersection Projects

6.1.3 Segment Projects

6.1.4 Systemic Safety Countermeasures

6.1.5 Projects Suggested through Public Input

6.2 Non-Engineering Strategies

6.2.1 Education

6.2.2 Emerging Technologies

6.2.3 Enforcement

6.2.4 Emergency Response

7. Prioritize and Incorporate Strategies

7.1 Funding Sources

7.2 Prioritized Projects

8. Evaluation Process

9. Next Steps

10. References
Table Index
Table 4.1
Table 4.2
Table 4.3
Table 6.5
Table 6.6
Table 7.1
Table 7.2
Comprehensive Collision Costs and EPDO Weights (2018 dollars) Top Intersections on City Roadways, Per Collision Analysis Top Segments on City Roadways, Per Collision Analysis
Proposed Systemic Projects
Projects Suggested through Public Input
Priority of City Intersection Projects
Priority of City Segment Projects
Figure Index
Figure 1.1 California SHSP (2020-2024
Figure 1.2 FHWA's LRSP Development Process
Figure 2.1 Fatal and Severe Injury Collisions in the City of Anderson (2015-2019) Figure 2.2 SHSP Challenge Areas
32 32
37 40
40 42
42 42
42 43
44 44
44 47
49 50
14 15
15 40
41 45
46 1
1 3
4 Figure 2.3 FHWA's LRSP Development Map (Source: Federal Highway Administration) 5 Figure 3.1 Safe Systems Approach 8
Figure 4.1 Total Collisions within the City of Anderson (2015-2020) 11 Figure 4.2 Collision Density on All Roadways (2015-2019) 12 Figure 4.3 Night Collisions with No Streetlights (2015-2019) 13 Figure 4.4 Summary of City Collisions (2015-2019) 14
Figure 4.5 Top Violation Categories on City Roadways (2015-2019) 14 Figure 4.6 Collision Density on Caltrans Roadways (2015-2019) 16 GHD I City of Anderson 1112258751 Local Road Safety Plan vi This document is in draft fonn. The contents. including any opinions, conclusions or recommendations contained in, or which may be implied from. this draft document must not be relied upon. GHD reserves the right, at any time, without notice, to modify or retract any part or all of the draft documenl To the maximum extent pennitted by law, GHD disclaims any responsibility or liability arising from or in connection with this draft documenl Figure 4.7
Figure 4.8
Figure 4.9
Figure 4.10
Figure 4.11
Figure 4.12
Figure 4.13
Figure 4.14
Figure 4.15
Figure 4.16
Figure 4.17
Figure 4.18
Figure 5.1
Figure 5.2
Figure 5.3
Figure 5.4
Figure 6.1
Figure 6.2
Figure 6.3
Top Violation Categories on City Roadways (2015-2019) 17 Summary of City Collisions (2015-2019) 17
Total Collisions within the City of Anderson (2020) 19
Collisions by Year on City of Anderson Roadways (2015-2020) 19 Collisions by Year on Caltrans Roadways (2015-2020) 20
Top Violation Categories for Bicycle Collisions (2015-2019) 21 Map of Bicycle Collisions on City Roadways (2015-2019) 22 Map of Bicycle Collisions on Caltrans Roadways (2015-2019) 22 Top Violation Categories for Pedestrian Collisions (2015-2019) 23 Map of Pedestrian Collisions on City Roadways (2015-2019) 24 Map of Pedestrian Collisions on Caltans Roadways (2015-2019) 24 Top Violation Categories for Intersection Collisions (2015-2019) 25 Public Website Home Page 28
Public Website Interactive Map 29
Public-Identified Roadway Issues 29
Preferred Safety Measures 30
Proposed Striping Concept for the Intersection of Rhonda Road and Pleasant Hills Drive 36
Locations of Proposed Speed Feedback Signs
Ferry Street Concept
39 40
Appendices
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
Stakeholder and Public Input
Collision Data
Field Reconnaissance
GHD I City of Anderson 111225875 I Local Road Safety Plan vii This document is in draft fonn. The contents, including any opinions, conclusions or recommendaUons contained in, or which may be implied from, this draft document must not be relied upon, GHD reserves 1he right. at any time. wi1hout notice, to modify or retract any part or all or the draft document. To the maximum extent permitted by law, GHD disclaims any responsibility or liability arising from or in connection with this draft document.

List of Abbreviations
AASHTO
APS
ATP
BCR
BUI

CAMUTCD
CMAQ
DUI
EPDO
FHWA
FSI
HSIP
HSM
LRSM
LRSP
SRTA
SHSP
SSAR
SWITRS
TIMS
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Accessible Pedestrian Signal
Active Transportation Program or Plan
Benefit to Cost Ratio
Biking Under the Influence
California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality
Driving Under the Influence
Equivalent Property Damage Only
Federal Highway Administration
Fatal or Severe Injury
Highway Safety Improvement Program
Highway Safety Manual
Local Roadway Safety Manual
Local Road Safety Plan
Shasta Regional Transportation Agency
Strategic Highway Safety Plan
Systemic Safety Analysis Report
Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System
Transportation Injury Mapping System
GHD I City of Anderson I 11225875 I Local Road Safety Plan viii This document is in draft form. The contents, including any opinions. conclusions or recommendations contained in, or which may be implied from, this draft document must not be rel ed upon, GHD reserves the right. at any time, Without notice, to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document. To the maximum extent permitted by law, GHD d sclaims any responsibility or flabllity arising from or in connection with th:s draft document.

1. Introduction
The project involves the development of a Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP), which provides local agencies an opportunity to address unique roadway safety needs in their jurisdictions. This comprehensive document will both help to guide City in safety countermeasures and allow eligibility for funding in future HSIP applications.

The process of preparing an LRSP creates a framework to systematically identify and analyze local safety problems and recommend engineering safety improvements for future Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) funding.

Preparing an LRSP facilitates local agency partnerships and collaboration, resulting in a prioritized list of
improvements and actions that contribute to California's Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) overall vision and goals. This SHSP focuses on reducing fatal and severe
injury collisions (FSI collisions) with focused
challenge/emphasis areas with a focus on the Five "E's" of Traffic Safety (see Figure 1.1).

The City and GHD will follow the Federal Highway
Administration's (FHWA) Local Road Safety process in
the following six (6) steps as shown in Figure 1.2:
. ! ..

Emphasis
Areas
THE FIVE "Ea" OF TRAfflC SAFETY
PICIIN£ERINO
Figure 1.1 California SHSP (2020-2024

THELRSP

DEVELOPMENT

PROCESS
0 Est•bllsh
adershlp
f)
Analyze
SafetyD•ta
Figure 1.2 FHWA 's LRSP Development Process
In working with the first step of establishing leadership, GHD and the City of Anderson reached out to the various stakeholder representative for the LRSP working group in capturing the "5E's" and local community members that can contribute to the overall safety plan for the City of Anderson. This working group was key in creating a comprehensive safety plan that is tailored to address the local needs and issues.

GHD I City of Anderson I 11225875 I Local Road Safety Plan 1 This document is in draft form. The contents. including any opinions. condusions or recommendations contained in, or which may be implied from, this draft document must not be relied upon. GHD reserves lhe right, at any time, without notice. to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document. To the maximum extent permitted by law, GHD discla.ms any responsibility or liability aris ng from or 1n connection with this draft document.

2. Background

2.1 Purpose and Need
The City of Anderson has a current approximate population of 10,000 and is located in Shasta County, California. It is located around 14 miles south of Redding and 5 miles north of Cottonwood. Both State Route 273 (SR 273) and Interstate 5 (1-5) pass through the city in the north-south direction. There have not been many significant improvements on the City's roadways over the years, so this document will be essential for identifying and planning future safety improvements.

In focusing in on the roadway safety needs, the past five (5) years of collisions (2015-2019) were evaluated for City roadways and the high severity collisions are discussed below.

2.1.1 City Roadways
During the five-year period (2015-2019), there were one (1) fatal and thirteen (13) severe injury collisions recorded for the roadways under the City of Anderson's jurisdiction. There were three (3) fatal and nine (9) severe injury collisions at at-grade locations under Ca1trans jurisdiction in the City.

The fatal collision under City jurisdiction had the following characteristics:
• Downing Lane at Claude Lane
2018, Unsafe Speed, Vehicle-Pedestrian, Pedestrian in Road The fatal collisions under Caltrans jurisdiction had the following characteristics:
• SR 273 at Anderson Creek Bridge
2015, Pedestrian Violation, Vehicle-Pedestrian, Pedestrian was in Road, Dark • SR 273, south of South St
2017, Single Vehicle, Unsafe Speed, Hit Object
• SR 273, north of Breckenridge Ln
2018, Unsafe Speed, Broadstde
See Figure 2.1 for a map of the fatal and severe injury collisions on City and Caltrans roadways between 2015 and 2019. In improving roadway safety for the City of Anderson, it is important to focus on mitigating these high injury and loss of life collisions.

GHD I City of Anderson 1112258751 Local Road Safety Plan 2 This document is in draft folTTI. The contents, including any opinions, conclusions or recommendations contained in, or which may be impl,ed from, this draft document must not be relied upon. GHD reserves the right, at any time, without notice, to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document. To the maximum extent permitted by law, GHD discla"ms any responsibility or liability arising from or in connection with this draft document.

2.2 ;
.. .. .. ,,,, ..
ti'
/ " ,I
1 ,
,
.... ..
' I
,
' -. -',,,-~· I
I ·--~--~-
--- I -· I
I
.-.. ... ....
~ . l
...

COlllslon
StVtrlty
.. ,_
• Severe Injury
•: City Boundary
Figure2.1 Fatal and Severe Injury Collisions in the City of Anderson (2015-2019) Standards and Guidelines
In developing the City of Anderson LRSP, the following standards and guidelines were followed:
• "Local Roadway Safety, A Manual for California's Local Road Owners", Caltrans, Version 1.5, April 2020.
• 2020-2024 California's Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP), "California Safe Roads: 2020-2024 Strategic Highway Safety Plan", Caltrans.
• "Developing Safety Plans, A Manual for Local Rural Road Owners", Federal Highway Administration, March 2012.
• "Highway Safety Manual", American Association of State Hfghway Officials (AASHTO), 1s1 Edition, 2014 supplement.

GHD I City of Anderson 111225875 I Local Road Safety Plan 3 This document is in draft form. The contents, including any opinions, conclusions or recommendations contained in, or which may be implied from, this draft document must not be relied upon. GHD reserves lhe right, at any time, w ithout notice, to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document. To the maximum extent permitted by law, GHD disclaims any responsibility or liability arising from or in connection with this draft document. • "California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD)", Revision 5, 2014.

2.2.1 California Strategic Highway Safety Plan
The LRSP will complement California's SHSP 2020-2024. Per this plan, the recommended challenge areas are shown in Figure 2.2. This plan will focus on challenge/emphasis areas that are determined through data analysis and stakeholder input.

AGGRESSIVE DRIVING l!MERGENCY MOTORCYCLISTS
Rl!SPONSI!
• AGING DRIVl!RS EMERGING . OCCUPANT ~ TECHNOLOGIES PROTECTION 0 BICYCLISTS

IMPAIRED DRIVING PEDESTRIANS
COMMERCIAl
VEHICU!S I NTH SECTIONS WORK ZONES
DISTRACTED DRIVING LANE DEPARTURES • YOUNG DRIVERS

DRIVER UCENSING
Figure 2.2 SHSP Challenge Areas

2.3 Methodology
The LRSP methodology followed the FHWA's LRSP development process as shown in Figure 2.3.

Below is a roadmap created by the Federal Highway Administration to show the process of creating the Local Road Safety Plan. Here are the primary steps used to create this plan:

1. Identify Stakeholders
i) Working Group was formed of the 5 E's and other interested representatives.

2. Use Safety Data
i) Past 5 years of collisions were analyzed with discussion of other high-risk locations.

3. Chose Proven Solutions
i) FHWA Proven Countermeasures and Ca/trans safety countermeasures were used in mitigation collision trends and risk characteristics.

4. Implement Solutions
i) Projects were identified for specific location and systemically.

GHD I City of Anderson I 11225875 I local Road Safety Plan 4 This document is in draft fonn. The contents. including any opinions, conclusions or recommendations contained in. or which may be implied from, this draft document must not be relied upon. GHD reserves the right, at any time, without notice, to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document To the maximum extent permitted by Jaw, GHD disclaims any responsibility or liability arising from or fn connection w ith this draft document.

Local Road
Safetv Plane: YOU' Map fo 1dtN RoadNOl'1
No acdlM whal yow NICMCfl. o local lood _...,. ,..,. .. owcte rcau ID dotial·*""" .,.._ ofld tcdeir rood, -
Figure 2.3 FHWA 's LRSP Development Map (Source: Federal Highway Administration) GHD I City of Anderson I 11225875 I Local Road Safety Plan 5 This document is in draft fonn. The contents, including any opinions. condusions or recommendations contained in, or which may be implied from. this draft document must not be relied upon. GHO reserves the right, at any time, without notice, to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document. To the maximum extent permitted by law, GHD disclaims any responsibility or liability arising from or in connection with this draft document.

3. Safety Partners/Stakeholders

3.1 Stakeholder Working Group Members
Based on community connections, the City of Anderson led the formation of the LRSP Stakeholder Working Member Group. This leadership group was crucial in the development of the LRSP and helped in capturing the safety needs, goals, and priorities including safety countermeasures for the City of Anderson.

The Stakeholder Working Group included the following
representatives:
•
•
City of Anderson
Caltrans, District 2
• Anderson Police Department
• Anderson Fire Protection District
• Shasta County Public Works
• Shasta Regional Transportation Agency
• Anderson Union High School
• Cascade Union Elementary School District
• Shasta Living Streets
• Shasta County Health and Human Services

3.1.1 Stakeholder Working Group
Meetings
®
-
•
• •
•M. • • Health & Human I Sha.to County
M Services Agency
~ ~ -
Cascade
U"ion E~men•:.r)r S<hool Diu,ki
lruptrw, ·~-~,At~
Two meetings were held with the stakeholder working group and facilitated by GHD. The virtual meetings were as follows:
• May 27, 2021 - 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
o Discussed the LRSP overall process, working group member's safety priorities, past 6 years of collisions (City and Caltrans roadways), vision, goals, and priorities. • September 14, 2021 -10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.
o Revfewed first meeting, discussed public comments and ways to address their concerns, recent developments, safety countermeasures and projects, refined of LRSP's guiding principles, and coordinated next steps.

The meeting summaries for the stakeholder working group meetings are in Appendix A: Stakeholder and Public Input. The stakeholder working group also provided their feedback and comments on the Draft Local Road Safety Plan document before the plan was finalized. With many of the safety countermeasures to include engineering, enforcement, and emergency response, it is important to have buy off from the stakeholders in understanding how the plan will be implemented.

GHD I City of Anderson I 11225875 I Local Road Safety Plan 6 This document ,s in draft fonn. The contents, including any opinions. conclusions or recommendations contained in, or which may be implied from. this draft document must not be relied upon. GHD reserves the right, at any time. without noUce, to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document To the maximum extent permitted by law, GHD disclaims any responsibility or liability ans,ng from or in connection with this draft document.

3.2 SHSP Challenge Areas
Based on the LRSP Working Group Meetings, this LRSP will address multiple Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) Challenge Areas including:

1. Bicyclists

2. Pedestrians

3. Intersections

4. Aggressive Driving/ Speeding

5. Distracted Driving

3.3 Guiding Principles
The members of the working group coordinated to establish the vision, mission statement, and goals that guided the development of the document. Ideally, this document will help the City move toward Vision Zero.

The aim of Vision Zero is to eliminate all traffic fatalities and severe injuries, while increasing safe, healthy, and equitable mobility for all. Traditionally, traffic deaths and severe injuries have been considered as inevitable side effects of modern life. The reality is that these tragedies can be addressed over time by taking a proactive, preventative approach that prioritizes traffic safety as a public health issue.

3.3.1 Vision Zero
Vision Zero is a significant departure from the status quo in two major ways:
• Vision Zero recognizes that people will sometimes make mistakes, so the road system and related policies should be designed to minimize those inevitable mistakes and reduce their likeliness to result in severe injuries or fatalities. This means that system designers and policymakers are expected to improve the roadway environment, policies (such as speed management), and other related systems to lessen the severity of crashes. Roadway users are however still responsible for their mistakes and should follow all applicable laws and use reasonable judgement when conducting themselves within the public right of way.
• Vision Zero is a multidisciplinary approach, bringing together diverse and necessary stakeholders to address this complex problem. In the past, meaningful, cross-disciplinary collaboration among local traffic planners and engineers, policymakers, and public health professionals has not been the norm.

Vision Zero acknowledges that many factors contribute to safe mobility - including roadway design, speeds, behaviors, technology, and policies - and sets clear goals to achieve the shared goal of zero fatalities and severe injuries.

3.3.2 Safe Systems Approach
In providing a comprehensive approach to safety, the Safe System approach is to design our vehicles and infrastructure in a manner that anticipates human error and accommodates human tolerances with a goal of reducing fatal and serious injuries. The following framework is intended to assist the vehicle and infrastructure communities in making decisions in alignment with Safe System principles. Implementing and selecting safe system practices and design will incrementally improve safety over time.

The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) defines the safe systems approach and framework as the following:
"The Safe System approach differs from conventional safety practice by being human-centered, i.e. seeking safety through a more aggressive use of vehicle or roadway design and operational changes rather than GHD I City of Anderson I 11225875 I Local Road Safety Plan 7 This document is in draft form. The contents, including any opinions, conclusions or recommendations contained in, or which may be implied from. this draft document must not be relied upon. GH D reserves the right, at any time, without notice, to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document. To the ma~,m urn extent permitted by law, GHD disclaims any responsibility o, liability arising from or in connection w ith this draft document. relying primarily on behavioral changes - and by fully integrating the needs of all users (pedestrians, bicyclists, older, younger, disabled, etc.) of the transportation system. Safe Systems provide a safety-net for the user by:

1. Anticipating Human Error-A Safe System is designed to anticipate and accommodate errors by drivers and other road users.

2. Accommodating Human Injury Tolerance - A Safe System is designed to reduce or eliminate opportunities for crashes resulting in forces beyond human endurance." Adopting a Safe System approach does not absolve users of their responsibility. Other safety practices such as speed management strategies, driver education, enforcement, and effective emergency response will remain essential to improving road safety. With the passing of Assembly Bill (AB) 43, there will be flexibility in setting speed limits.

Figure 3.1 shows a graphic of the safe systems approach.

3.3.3 3.3.3.1
Figure3.1 Safe Systems Approach
Vision, Mission Statement, and Goals
Vision
A vision statement describes what the Local Road Safety Plan is trying to achieve.

The City of Anderson will provide a safe, sustainable, and equitable multimodal transportation system for all users of the public roadways in the city . . - -- - - ---~- ---- -~-........ -

3.3.3.2 Mission Statement
The mission statement defines the purpose of the plan. what it does. and what it is about. The mission statement was developed in collaboration with the working group.

GHO I City of Anderson I 11225875 I Local Road Safety Plan 8 This document is in draft fonn. The contents, including any opinions, conclusions or recommendations contained in, or which may be implied from, this draft document must not be relied upon. GHD reserves the right, at any time. without notice, to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document. To the maximum extent pennitted by law. GHD disclaims any responsibility or liab· ity arising from or in connection with this draft document.

Working together in Anderson, we will ensure all people have the transportation choice to walk, bike, and drive, while we work to achieve zero fatalities and no life-altering injuries on our roadways - because every person in our community matters.

3.3.3.3 Goals
Safety goals were development for the Local Road Safety Plan. It is important to capture realistic goals that can be measurable or evolve over time.

3.3.4 Goal #1: Improve safety around schools with a connected multimodal system, enhanced crossings, and education and enforcement
Goal #2: Strive toward zero fatal and severe injury collisions citywide Goal #3: Reduce speeding collisions through engineering, enforcement, education, and emerging technologies strategies
Goal #4: Improve multimodal transportation safety by expanding the City's non-motorized transportation infrastructure
Goal #5: Increase walking, biking, rolling (wheelchair, skateboard, scooter, etc.) to downtown district, to work, and to school
Goal #6: Reduce pedestrian and bicycle collisions with enhanced crossings, multimodal accommodations, and lighting
Goal #7: Improve the health and vitality of our community with a safe, sustainable, and equitable multimodal transportation system for all users of the public roadways Goal #8: Reduce broadside collisions with the appropriate traffic control device, signage and pavement markings, improved sight distance, and lighting
Goal #9: Residents report they have safe, comfortable, convenient routes on local roads where they are walking, biking, rolling, or driving
Motto
The stakeholder working group suggested adding a motto for the LRSP. The motto, shown below, is a simple way to build clarity and understanding to residents for the plan.

Walk safe. Ride safe. Drive safe.

GHD I City of Anderson I 11225875 I Local Road Safety Plan 9 This document is in draft form. The contents, including any opinions. conclusions or recommendations conta'ned in, or which may be implied from, this draft document must not be relied upon. GHD reserves the right. at any time. without notice. to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document. To the maximum extent permitted by law. GHD disclaims any responsibility or liability arising from or in connection with this draft document.

4. 4.1

4.1.1 Analyze Safety Data
Recent/Planned Safety Projects
SR 273 Multimodal Corridor Plan
fSIJ ~ i
In 2020, Shasta Regional Transportation Agency (SRTA) was awarded $500,000 for the State Route 273 Multimodal Corridor through a Strategic Partnerships Grant with Caltrans. This grant was for the northern section of SR 273 through Redding (northern terminus to Canyon Road). Caltrans also awarded a $500,000 Special Studies Grant for work on the southern section of SR 273 (Canyon Road to southern terminus).

SRTA hopes to combine the funding for both projects to create a comprehensive multimodal corridor plan for SR 273. If approved by Caltrans, SRTA will coordinate the scope of work with Anderson and • • tbllnln6· other affected cities. This project will likely include several multimodal and safety improvements on SR 273 that will benefit the City of Anderson.

4.1.2 Recently Completed Caltrans Projects
In early 2020, retroreflective borders were installed on backplates at all Caltrans signalized intersections.

Caltrans also recently installed closed circuit television (CCTV) cameras on SR 273 traffic signals. These cameras help monitor traffic and allow for real-time changes to phasing and timing. Caltrans is completing the Central Management Software (CMS) for this corridor to have communication to the traffic signals.

4.2 Collision Data
The City of Anderson collision data was gathered using the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS), and collision data from the Anderson Police Department. Each data set was analyzed, crosschecked, and compiled into one complete comprehensive data set. This process was done to ensure that all reported collisions occurring within the City are accounted for and to provide additional information that one system may not have captured. The data set contains six years' worth of collisions spanning from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2020. Collision data for the year 2020 was collected and analyzed separately as the COVI D-19 pandemic altered traffic patterns outside of the typical conditions.

Some additional collision data was provided by the Anderson Police Department but not included in the collision analysis due to a lack of collision details (specific location and if the collision is on private property). It is noted of these collisions were property damage only.

Between 2015 and 2020, 339 collisions were reported in the City of Anderson. These collisions were classified based on roadway jurisdiction (City or Caltrans). Collisions were further categorized into fntersection related collisions and roadway segment related collisions with a separate focus on the City streets and Caltrans roadways.

The pie chart in Figure 4.1 depicts the number of collisions by collision location (intersection or segment) and jurisdiction (City, SR 273, or 1-5 Ramps). The highest number of collisions was at City intersections (113 collistons).

GHD I City of Anderson 111225875 I Local Road Safety Plan 10 This document is in draft fonn. The contents, including any opin.ons, conclusions or recommendations contained In. or which may be implied from, this draft document must not be relied upon. GHD reserves the right. at any lime, without notice, to modify or retract any part or all of the draftdocumenl To the maximum extent permitted by law. GHD disclaims any responsibility or liability arising from or in connection with this draft document.

Figure4.1
l-5Ramps -
Intersection
35 Total Collisions within the City of Anderson (2015-2020) With the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) funding concentrating on the past five (5) years of collision data, further collision analysis focused on 2015 to 2019 as a representative set with 2020 being somewhat of an anomaly due to COVID lockdowns. As shown on the collision density map for 2015 to 2019 (see Figure 4.2 below), areas with high density of collisions include along Balls Ferry Road, North Street, SR 273, Locust Street, and Pleasant Hills Drive.

GHD I City of Anderson I 11225875 I Local Road Safety Plan 11 This document Is in draft fonn. The contents, including any opinions. conclusions or recommendations contained in, or which may be implied from. this draft document must not be relied upon, GHD reserves the right, at any time, without notice. to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document. To the maximum extent permitted by law. GHD d"sclaims any responsibility or liability arising from or in connection with this draft document.

I
I
~ ---·
CITYOF

ANDERSON
·------
' I
•
I
I
I I
' ------ ------·- -. Flgure4.2 Collision Density on All Roadways (2015-2019) L9nd
Collision
Density
.. ....

Low
\
In addition, City feedback indicated a desire to increase safety lighting throughout Anderson. Therefore, the collisions that occurred in the dark and were recorded to not have streetlights were mapped (see Figure 4.3).

As seen in the map, there is a concentration of high-severity collisions that occurred with no safety lighting on SR 273 near Anderson Creek (one fatal and two severe injury). There were also severe injury collisions at SR 273 at Alexander Avenue, Stingy Lane at Balls Ferry Road, and SR 273, south of Bruce Street that occurred in the dark with no streetlights.

GHD I City of Anderson I 11225875 ~ Local Road Safety Plan 12 This document is in draft form, The contents, including any opinions, conclusions or recommendations conta"ned in, or which may be implied from. this draft document must not be relied upon, GHD reserves the right, at any time, without notice, to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document. To the maximum extent permitted by law, GHD d sclaims any responsibility or liability arising from or in connection with th,s draft document,

4.2.1 -----..... ........ ---
.. .. -... ----
1 ~ .. I '
~ .. ~
, -..... ; ....

IAglnd
.hlrhdlctlon
• Clly
• cau,ano
Sevwl!y
• Fat.I
• Injury (Sever&)
t Injury (Ofler
Vbi>le)
~
• (Complaint of
Pein)
Properly
• Damage Only
: ; City Boundery
; .... .. ... ; , '' .... ... .. \ .... ___ ... , \
Oo
• ..
i
~
ll
I
I
,, ' , '' \ ... "
F" __ _,_____.:_, _____ , ',',, __ ,
Figure4.3 Night Collisions with No Streetlights (2015-2019) Collisions on City Roadways
There were 169 collisions recorded on City roadways between 2015 and 2019. There was 1 fatal collision and 13 severe injury collisions on City roadways. Broadside collisions were the most common collision type. Figure

4.4 summarizes the City collisions based on severity and type.

GHD I City of Anderson I 11225875 I Local Road Safety Plan 13 This document is in draft fonn. The contents, includ ng any op[nions, conelusibns or recommendations contained in, or which may be implied from, this draft document must not be relied upon. GH D reserves the right. at any lime, w ithout notice, to modify or retract any part or all or the draft document. To the maximum extent pennitted by law, GHD disclaims any responsibility orfiability ans·ng from or in connection with this draft document.

Vehicle/Pedestrian Other/N~t Stated
9 I
Figure4.4
Head
On
20 Severe lnju
13 Fatc!V
1 Summary of City Collisions (2015-2019)
The top four violation categories (not including unknown or not stated collisions) for City roadways are presented in Figure 4.5. The top violation category on City roadways was unsafe speed. The majority of unsafe speed collisions resulted in rear ends.

Wrong Way
Improper Turning
Automobile Right of Way
Unsafe Speed
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
• Head On • Sideswipe • Rear End Broadside • H~ Object • Overturned • Vehicle-Pedestrian • Other •Not Stated Figure4.5 Top Violation Categories on City Roadways (2015-2019) The total number of collisions and Equivalent Property Damage Only (EPDO) rating were assessed to determine the top study intersections (refer to Appendix B: Collision Data). Per the Ca/trans Local Roadway Safety Manual, it is recommended to rank locations with higher severity as higher focus. The Highway Safety Manual (HSM) methodology of Equivalent Property Damage Only (EPDO) rating assigns a weight to collisions in capturing the relative severity in equivalent property damage only (PDO =1).

Table 4.1 provides the comprehensive collision costs and EPDO weights that were used in ranking the collisions. Collision costs include both direct and indirect costs. Direct crash costs include ambulance service, police and fire services, property damage, insurance, and other costs directly related to the crashes. Indirect collfsion costs account for the value society would place on pain and suffering or loss of life associated with the crash.

Table4.1 Comprehensive Collision Costs and EPDO Weights (2018 dollars) GHD I City of Anderson I 11225875 I Local Road Safety Plan 14 This document is in draft fonn. The contents. including any opinions. conduslons or recommendations contained in, or which may be implied from, th's draft document must not be relied upon. GHD reserves the right, al any time. without notice, to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document To the maximum e)rtent pennitted by law. GHD disclaims any responsibility or liability aris "ng from « In connection with this draft document.

Severity I I Compre!1ens1ve Costs I EPDO Weight
! I
Fatal (K) $6,418,400 544
Severe Injury (A) $345,800 30
Minor Injury (B) $126,500 11 - NonNisible Injury (C) $71,900 6 - - ·- 1 PDO (0) $11 ,800 1 - ~- Based on Tabfe 7-1. Highway Safety Manual, 2010, Adjusted to 2018 dollars. -·- -- - The intersection of Downing Lane and Claude Lane had the highest EPDO due to a fatality. However, the intersection of Pleasant HUis Drive and Rhonda Road had the highest number of collisions (5). Table 4.2 shows the top intersections, per colHsion analys'is. Further detailed collision analysis is in Appendix B: Collision Data.

Table4.2 Top Intersections on City Roadways, Per Collision Analysis Primary Road I Secondary Road EPDO Total Collisions
Downing Ln Claude Ln 544 1
Balls Ferry Rd Stingy Ln / S Balls Ferry Rd 61 3
Pleasant Hills Dr Rhonda Rd 49 5
Deschutes Rd Corner Way 41 2
North St Ravenwood Rd 32 3
East St North St 19 4
I- -
- -
I North St Silver St 9 4
The segment collisions were also analyzed by EPDO and total number of collisions. Table 4.3 shows the top segments, per collision analysis. The segments of Riverside Avenue from the 1-5 northbound ramps to North Road and Olinda Road from the City boundary to Emily Road had the highest EPDO (54) and total collisions (5).

Table4.3 Top Segments on City Roadways, Per Collision Analysis Street Name Boundary EPDO Total
Collisions
Riverside Ave 1-5 NB Ramps to North Rd 54 5
Olinda Rd City Boundary to Emily Rd 54 5
Rhonda Rd Pleasant Hills Rd to South of Pleasant Hills Rd 44 5 Balls Ferry Rd South Stto Toyon St 42 3
S Balls Ferry Rd Balls Ferry Rd to Davey Way 37 3 --- - GHD I City of Anderson I 11225875 I Local Road Safety Plan 15 This document is in draft fonn. The contents, including any opinions, conclusions or recommendations contained in, or which may be implted from, this draft document must not be relied upon. GHO reserves the right, at any time, w'.thout notice to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document. To the maximum el<tent permitted by law, GHD disclaims any responsibility or liability arising from or In connecbon w th th.is draft document.

4.2.2 Collisions on Caltrans Roadways
There were 112 collisions on Caltrans roadways between 2015 and 2019. For the purpose of this analysis, this includes collisions along the at-grade portion of SR 273 (north of Spring Gulch Road to Pleasant Hills Drive) and the ramp intersections for 1-5. No collisions along the mainline of 1-5 were analyzed, as this sectton of the freeway does not interface with City roadways. As seen by the collision density map (see Figure 4.6), most of the collisions under Caltrans jurisdiction are concentrated at intersections along SR 273.

I
( .... .. ,
I
• '
, -..... -.. "" .. .. ... ...,... .. .. -
I
---.-"' .. -'
----. • ~ ---·
I
I
,3 ...... -
I
, ..
,,.
.
1 -
I
I
" - - - - - - ·- f
I
CITYOF

ANDERSON
•
t
• I
t I I
·--·-----·· ............. .

Figure4.6 Collis/on Density on Caltrans Roadways (2015-2019) i..o-i
comston
Density
Low
H,C,,
GHD I City of Anderson I 11225875 I Local Road Safety Plan 16 This document is in draft fonn. The contents, including any opinions, conclusions or recommendations contained in. or which may be implied from, this draft document must not be relied upon. GHD reserves the right, at any time, without notice, to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document. To the maximum extent pennitted by law. GHO disclaims any responsibility or liability arising from or in connection with this draft document.

The top three violation categories in order (not including unknown or not stated collisions) for Caltrans roadways are presented in Figure 4.7. The top violation category on Caltrans roadways was unsafe speed and the majority of those collisions were cited as rear-end. This is a common collision type for this type of violation as rear end collision typical occur due to congesUon, speed differential, or following too closely and are cited as unsafe speed.

Traffic Signals and Signs • ~----------~--
Automobile Right of Way • I
0 5 10 16 20 25 30 35 40
• Head On Sideswipe • Rear End Broadside • H~ Objact • Overturned • Vehicle-Pedestrian • Other • Not Stated Flgure4.7 Top Violation Categories on City Roadways (2015-2019) Figure 4.8 summarizes the Caltrans collisions based on severity and type. In total, there were 3 fatal and 9 severe injury collisions at Caltrans roadways. The majority of collisions were broadsides which typically occur at intersections.

Vehicle/Pedestrian \
10 Overturned
5 Other/Not Stated
( 1
Broadside
35 Figure4.8
Head On
6 Summary of City Collisions (2015-2019)
Severe Injury
9 Fatal
3 The intersection of SR 273 and Bruce Drive had the highest EPDO (66) and the intersections of SR 273 at North Street and at Factory Outlets Drive had the highest number of collisions (12). Table 4.4 shows the top intersections, per collision analysis. Further detailed collision analysis is in Appendix B: Collision Data.

GHD I City of Anderson 1112258751 Local Road Safety Plan 17 This document is in draft form. The contents, including any opinions. conclusions or recommendations contained in, or wh.,ch may be implied from. this draft document must not be relied upon. GHD reserves the right, at any time, without notice. to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document. To the maximum extent permitted by law, GHO disclaims any responsibility or liability aris[ng from or in connection with this draft document.

Table4.4 Top Intersections on Ca/trans Roadways, Per Collision Analysis Primary Road Secondary Road I EPDO Total Collisions
SR273 Bruce Dr 66 7
SR273 Marx Way 56 6
SR273 South St 48 9
SR273 Ox Yoke Rd 47 7
SR273 North St 47 12 -~
1 SR 273 Factory Outlets Dr 47 12
~ ~ 73 Pleasant Hills Dr 43 8 ~ - ---
The segment collisions were also analyzed by EPDO and total number of collisions. Table 4.5 shows the top segments, per collision analysis. The segment of SR 273 between South Street and Pleasant Hills Drive had the highest EPDO (1180) and number of collisions (7). This segment had 2 fatalities and 3 severe injuries between 2015 and 2019.

Table4.5 Top Segments on Caltrans Roadways, Per Collision Analysis SR273 City Boundary to Hayes St 559 6

4.2.3 2020 Collisions
This LRSP mainly focused on 2015 to 2019 collision data but we did evaluate the collisions in 2020 to determine any new trends or safety concerns. There were a total of 60 collisions reported in the City of Anderson, city limits, in 2020. Out of these collisions, 28 were on City roadways and 32 were on Caltrans roadways. The highest number of collisions were along SR 273 intersections, as seen in Figure 4.9.

GHD I City of Anderson I 11225875 I Local Road Safety Plan 18 This document is in draft fonn. The contents, including any opinions, conclusions or recommendations contained in, or which may be implied from, this draft document must not be relied upon. GHD reserves the right, at any time, without notice, to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document. To the maximum extent permitted by law, GHO disclaims any responsibility or liability arising from or in connection with this draft document.

Figure4.9
SR 273-
Mainline
5 1-5 Ramps -
Intersection
9 Total Collisions within the City of Anderson (2020)
Given that 2020 had COVID shelter in place orders, this year might not be representative of normal trafffc conditions. Figures 4.10 and 4.11 show the number and severity of collisions over time for roadways under City of Anderson jurisdiction and Caltrans jurisdiction, respectively. As shown in Figure 4.10, 2020 had higher collision severity than 2019 but less collisions. The collisions on City roads generally trended down over time, while collisions under Caltrans jurisdiction trended up in 2020. 3 8
2015
• Property Damage Only • Injury (Complaint of Pain) • Injury (Other Visible) Severe Injury • Falal 4 2016
Figure4.10
2'017 2018 2019
Collisions by Year on City of Anderson Roadways (2015-2020) 3 s
2020
GHD I City of Anderson I 11225875 I Local Road Safety Plan 19 This document is in draft form. The contents, ineluding any opinions, conclusions or recommendations contained in. or which may be implced from. this draft document must not be relied upon, GHD reserves the right, al any time, without notice, to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document To the maximum extent permitted by law, GHD disclaims any responsibility or liability arising from or in connection with this draft document • Property Damage Only • Injury (Complaint of Pein) lnJury (Other Visible) Severe Injury • Fatet 2 3
5 8
4 2
2015 2.018 2019 2020
Figure4.11 Collisions by Year on Ca/trans Roadways (2015-2020) ln 2020, there were 6 severe injury (3 on City roadways and 3 on SR 273) and 2 fatal collisions (1 on City roadways and 1 on SR 273). The fatal collisions had the following characteristics:
• Rupert Road, west of Park Place (City jurisdiction)
2020, Wrong Side of Road, Hit Object, Pedestrian was in Road, Dark with No Streetlights • SR 273, north of Briggs Street (Ca/trans jurisdiction) 2020, Pedestrian Violation, Vehicle-Pedestrian, Pedestrian in Road, Dark with No Streetlights The severe injury collisions were at the following locations:

City Roadways
• North Street, west of Stingy Lane
• Riverside Avenue at Alexander Avenue
• Ferry Street at Martha Street
Ca/trans Roadways
• SR 273 at Pleasant Hill Drive
• SR 273 at Pinon Avenue
• SR 273 at Briggs Street

4.2.4 Collisions Related to Challenge/Emphasis Areas

4.2.4.1 Bicyclists
Between 2015 and 2019, there were 6 total bicycle collisions for City roadways and 2 bicycle collisions for Caltrans roadways. Of these collisions, none were fatal and 2 were severe injury collisions (1 on City roads and 1 on Caltrans roads). The collision types for bicycle-related collisions, along with corresponding severities are shown in Figure 4.12 below. The primary collision types are sideswipes, rear ends, and broadsides. The locations of bicycle collisions, along with their respective severity and lighting characteristics are shown in Figures 4.13 and 4.14.

GHD I City of Anderson 1112258751 Local Road Safety Plan 20 This document is in draft fonn. The contents, including any opinions, condusions or recommendations conta,ned in. or which may be implied from. this draft document must not be relied upon. GHD reserves the right. at any time. w,thout notice. to modify or retract any pert or all of the draft document. To the maximum extent permitted by law, GHD disclaims any responsiblity or liability arising from or In connection with this draft document.

Sideswipe
Rear End
Broadside -..-. -:-. ~-~ - . ~-l
Head-On
Vehicle-Pedestnen
0 0.5 1_5 2 16
• Fetal • Severe Injury Visible I nJury • Complamt of Pain • Property Damage Only Figure4.12 Top Violation Categories for Bicycle Collfslons (2015-2019) GHD I City of Anderson I 11225875 I Local Road Safety Plan 21 This document is in draft form. The contents, including any opinions, conclusions or recommendations contained in, or which may be implied from, this draft document must not be relied upon. GH D reserves the right, at any time. without notice. to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document. To the maximum extent permitted by law, GHD disclaims any responsibility or liability arising from or in connection with this draft document. , ,
,
' ' ' , . .,\ ,
./
~
//
,
;
'• ...

I
I ,
'
.;• •'
/
-.. -,,,~Ill ...
• I
tnju,yf$ ..... )
tnju,ylONr
- l tnju,y ,c..._ .. PulJ
·=Orly Bleycta
ColHslon
e Doy
,-...... ---....... ,' ,.._ .. etMgihl. ... ... .. , ... -........ --- _ .. ,' ..... ------
Figure4.13
Figure4.14
·---· I
I
I
,
•
,,
/
,
Map of Bicycle Collisions on City Roadways (2015-2019)
--. ....,""' ........ .. ......... A" I
, ..
~
I/
L_.i
.lav.rlly , ....
~ ,s...,.1 ~l()N,
-)
~
(C-OI
Poo,i
·=Orly Bleycle
Colllslon
-· C 0e, ,,' ............ Q NotlC
, '"-.... ~'' -:Cll)'Bcundary"
------ .... / ,, ' , ', ~ .. ' ,, ,- , ... ,,, ,,',_,,'' ',,,, , .. , ,,' /-... ,·
,' ~ ' ' / ,· ,1 ,r , ,
Map of Bicycle Collisions on Ca/trans Roadways (2015-2019) GHD I City of Anderson I 11225875 I Local Road Safety Plan 22 This document is in draft fonn. The contents, including any opinions, conclusions or recommendations contained in, or which may be 1mpl ed from, this draft document must not be relied upon. GHD reserves lhe right, at any lime. wilhout notice, to modify o, retract any part or all of the draft documenl To the maximum extent permitted by law. GHD disclaims any responsibilily or liabilily arising from or in connection with this draft document.

4.2.4.2 Pedestrians
There were 1 O total pedestrian collisions for City roadways and 1 O total pedestrian collisions for Caltrans roadways between 2015 and 2019. Of these collisions, 2 were fatal (1 on City roads and 1 on Caltrans roads) and occurred due to the pedestrian was in the roadway, including shoulder area. Six were severe injury (SI) collisions (1 on City roads and 5 on Caltrans roads) and occurred at various locations with the majority (3 SI collisions) in the road, including shoulder. It is noted that pedestrians are more vulnerable in the roadways. The pedestrian locations for pedestrian-related collisions are shown in Figure 4.15 below. Most pedestrians were either crossing in a crosswalk at an intersection or in the road or shoulder at the time of the collision. The majority of pedestrian collisions were along SR 273. The locations of pedestrian collisions, along with their respective severity and lighting characteristics are shown in Figures 4.16 and 4.17.

In Road. lncludngShoulder ·······================~
Cross,ng Not In Crosswalk
Crossing in Crosswalk at lntersettion
0 2 3 4 5 6 1 8
• Fatal • Severe lnrury • ViS1ble lnJury • Ccmplaint of Pain • Prc,perty Damage Only Figure4.15 Top Violation Categories for Pedestrian Collisions (2015-2019) GHD I City of Anderson 1112258751 Local Road Safety Plan 23 This document is in draft fonn. The contents, including any opinions, conclusions or recommendations contained in, or which may be implied from, this draft document must not be relied upon. GHO reserves the right, at any time. without notice to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document, To the maximum extent permitted by law. GHO disclaims any responsibility or liability arising from or in connection with th;s draft document. ' ' ' '"",\
' / //
,
,_
~ I ,
' -..... , ,-- " I I
Flgure4.16
,_
•
,
,
,
~
'~ .... .. ......
/ ,
, ,
---1
I ,
'
' /'
-... ·"' , - - " I I
'
-··
Lita
Severity
. , .... •~(-) o=.:~·
.~"' ..... ,
Pwdntrt.~ ·=Onlr Calllalon
0 Doy
•-.. ,,, ....... ,..._,Cl)Nlght
n"·- ~ '"S -- ,' ::co,.--. ..... I .................... _ ... -' ~ +• / I
,' \. ,, ·' ',,,,,-,. ' ,, ' ' , , ... , ',,' , ... , , .f ,' /. < ,1" ' ,. ' ., ( V ' ,,' ~,
' ,
,
---
Map of Pedestrian Collisions on City Roadways (2015-2019) ------------ "" .. --.....
t_.i
Severity
...... ...... ,-)
o:~
.~,, ..... ,
• =°"Ir PoclHlrlon
Colltlon
O o.y ,......... .,.., ,' .......... w Night
, ' : .: Cly !loundoty
, '
• I
Figure4.17 Map of Pedestrian Co/1/slons on Ca/tans Roadways (2015-2019) GHD I City of Anderson I 11225875 I local Road Safety Plan 24 This document is in draft form. The contents. including any opin ons, conclusions or recommendations contained in, or whfch may be impl'ed from. th s draft document must not be relied upon. GHO reserves the right, at any time, without notice, to modify or retract any part or all or the draft document To the maximum extent permitted by law, GHO disclaims any responsibility or liability arising from or in connection with this draft document.

4.2.4.3 Intersections
There were 97 collisions at City intersections and 99 collisions at Caltrans intersections during the study period.

These account for approximately 70% of all collisions in the City between 2015 and 2019. The top collision type is broadside and top violation category is unsafe speed. Figure 4.18 outlines the top five violation categories and their associated collision types for the intersections.

Traffic Signals and Signs
~oogWay •1111t::::==::=:::J
Improper Tuming - - ---- -
Automobile Right of Way • •1111:==::'.::=========::::'.:==:i Unsafe Speed •• 11111:""--~-:=-:-----~---:::J
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
• Head On S1deSW1pe • Rear End Broadside • Hit Object • Overturned • Vehicle-Pedestrian Ii Other • Not Stated Figure4.18 Top Violation Categories for Intersection Collisions (2015-2019)

4.2.4.4 Aggressive Driving / Speeding
50 Aggressive driving can be quantified through collision data through unsafe speed violations. There were 44 collisions due to unsafe speed on City roadways and 39 on Caltrans roadways between 2015 and 2019. Many of these collisions resulted in property damage only and rear end collisions. Of the unsafe speed collisions, 3 were fatal (1 on City roads and 2 on Caltrans roads) and 5 were severe injury collisions (4 on City roads and 1 on Caltrans roads).

4.2.4.5 Distracted Driving
Distracted driving is categorized in collision data as inattention. Categories for inattention include cell phones (handheld or hands-free), electronic equipment, smoking, eating, children, animal, personal hygiene, and reading. From 2015 to 2019, there were 5 collisions with at least one party cited due to inattention. Out of these collisions, 1 was due to eating and 4 were cited as "other". There was one severe injury collision as a result of inattention.

4.3 Field Reconnaissance
A field visit was performed on Thursday, December 2~d to analyze the roadways throughout the City of Anderson and observe areas with high densities of public comments and collisions. Notes and photos from this visit are compiled in Appendix C: Field Reconnaissance.

Some general notes made based on what was observed during the field visit are listed below. • The c •ty hopes to promote East Center Street as Anderson's downtown. • Anderson River Park is used for many City events.

GHD I City of Anderson 1112258751 local Road Safety Plan 25 This document is in draft form. The contents, induding any opin·ons, condusions or recommendations contained in, or which may be implied from, this draft document must not be relied upon. GHO reserves the right, at any lime. without notice. to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document. To the maximum extent permitted by law, GHD d1sda1ms any responsibility or hability aris[ng from or in connection with this draft document. • Very few bicyclists and pedestrians were observed. Many of the pedestrian and bicycle facilities were discontinuous.

GHD I City of Anderson I 11225875 I Local Road Safety Plan 26 This document is in draft fonn. The contents, including any opinions, conclusions or recommendations contained in, or which may be implied from, this draft document must not be relied upon. GH D reserves the right, at any time, without notice, to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document To the maximum e>etent pennitted by law, GHD disclaims any responsibility or liability arising from or in connectiion with this draft document. • SR 273 runs through the middle of Anderson and complicates connectivity between the northeast and southwest portions of the City. Along this corridor, speeds are high and all signalized intersections have retroreflective borders.

GHD I City of Anderson I 11225875 1 Local Road Safety Plan 27 This document is rn draft form. The contents. including any opinions. conclusions or reeommendations contained in, or which may be implied from. this draft document must not be relied upon. GHD reserves the righl at any time, without notice. to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document To the maximum extent permitted by law, GHD disclaims any responsib~ity or liabirty arising from or In connection w ith this draft document.

5. Public Outreach

5.1 Public Website
A project website was created on the Social Pinpoint
platform to inform the public about the LRSP and
provide a platform for public engagement. Figure 5.1
displays the homepage for the website found at
lrsp.mysocialpinpoint.com/Anderson. The project
website has the Google Translate option enabled that
can translate the webpage in over 100 languages and
detects the user's browsers settings to automatically
display the website in their language preference. In
addition, the user can toggle the preferred language
on the upper right corner of the webpage. Visitors to
the page were invited to provide comments on an
interactive project map and share their thoughts
through a project survey. Comments from the
interactive map and detailed results from the survey
are included in Appendix A: Stakeholder and Public
Input.

5.1.1 Interactive Map
The interactive map feature on the website allowed
the public to drag icons to a location within the City
and leave a comment regarding driving, transit,
schools biking, or pedestrians at that location. Figure

5.2 shows the interactive map feature from the
®
City of Anderson Local Road
Safety Plan :)c,c,..•"C" ~.1<!¢'1:'"1=>:-• l+n·• • r-1 ,1,c"""'r.r.c.· 1<-.u('fn."'r .. :r.n1:•n;"'4'c~ • .,.,.•r.+ ~fl,.,,,, 0:1 ~•:, ·-r- 1 •· ,.,..,. .. c ,-c+· •...:: ...,,.,.,, :-..... :-n· r•· v.r ~,·s:r .. ,.r_. .... ..oc• :rc:..:it'~, :.r, .•s:,.:·~ ~~..t<:w:.:c:•1 "'t"»-.D"'l:"",e •cw .1,1~""1+\:l::"",c..•cc• .... .,.-,
.....,':"rtl'Vldcvo--:-•.,.o.W
-...:1:+:• IE:lf"".¥~.I...I <"'O,
~r:--.....:t-..::-,•r.
***
S-t'1,').l~O'~SIIAII
~"=--•~"J~1:-1,..,c,,,.,.,.
1'5:dM
F/gure5.1 Public Website Home Page
website. Areas with high densities of interactive map comments include North Street at Oak Street and on Stingy Lane.

GHD I City of Anderson I 11225875 I Local Road Safety Plan 28 Th s document f$ in draft form. The contents, includ ng any opinions. conclusions or recommendations contained in, or which may be implied from. this draft document must not be relied upon. GHD reserves the right, at any time, without notice. to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document. To the meximum extent permitted by law. GHD disclaims any responsibirty or liability arising from or in connection with thcs draft document. .

I
9 11A UJ
Oraglo > A l)lii•J I:\ Tr;W
commen, .., (o-~-t"'i W Con',T.H:
... -" ...
' Sh,..t•t• Olouitt Fol, ~ & Event Center
\ t/~ "• , .l
.
.. , -.. , , ..... -. ,, I
/~ ''\ 1,.
.,.... .. : ~~· -. .... - •• • ft'!' ''\ 1,.
f ., I
' -..... -... • I
I Lqtnd 0
• .. -... -· ' City Boundary <\)
- r_._..,..,. • ...,,,l~
Figure 5.2 Pub/le Website Interactive Map
Individual comments, along with their respective responses, are presented in Appendix A: Stakeholder and Public Input.

5.1.2 Public Survey
The City of Anderson Public Survey asked eight questions relating to the LRSP. As of October 1, 2021 the survey received 6 responses. According to the survey, the primary safety issues for Anderson are intersections and distracted driving (see Figure 5.3 for a pie graph with the responses).

Inadequate UH of sc•t,bclts •nd child rcstr•ints: O
Roedwa:, Lighting: 2 -
LIICk of Infrastructure jsldewalks, bike lanH, cross-walks, turn l•nH, etc), 3 Driving Under the Influence of Drugs & Alcohol: 1
Intersections: 4
/ _ Blcycte Collisions: o
~ Pedll!stri•n conJslons: o
Motorcycle Collisions: O
Speed Rll!leted Collisions: 3
Dfstracted DrMnJ= 4
F/gureS.3 Public-Identified Roadway Issues
The survey asked residents if there were any locations where they would like to see improvements. The locations collected from the survey are shown below.

Oak Street and North Street - Evaluate installation of an all-way stop GHD I City of Anderson I 11225875 I Local Road Safety Plan 29 Th s document is in draft form. The contents, Including any oplrr'ons, conclusions or recommendations oontained in, or which may be implied from, this draft document must not be relied upon. GH D reserves the right, at any time, without notice, to modify or retract aoy part or all of the draft document. To the maximum extent permitted by law, GHD disclaims any respons"bility or liability arising from or in connection w ith thfs draft document Crestview Road and Old Williamston Road - Increase enforcement for speeding and evaluate installation of an all-way stop
Rupert Road- Consider adding speed management devices and installing additional multimodal infrastructure (sidewalks, upgraded bike lanes, etc.)
Rupert Road - Consider installing sidewalks and mitigate speeding Intersections along SR 273
Pinon Avenue- Consider installing speed management devtces (specifically, speed humps) On average, the responses indicated that residents were somewhat uncomfortable using alternate modes of travel (walking, biking, public transit, etc.) in the City of Anderson. Generally, responses showed that residents would not be willing to use alternate modes of travel to get to work, school, shopping, or other destinations. The improvement suggested to encourage residents to use alternate modes of travel more often is additional multimodal infrastructure.

For level of comfort using a motor vehicle (e.g., car, SUV, motorcycle, pickup, etc.), responses were different.

The responses indicated that residents were very comfortable using a motor vehicle in the City of Anderson.

The top safety measures shown through the survey responses are shown in Figure 5.4.

DUI dletkpOlnu: ,
Speed lttdlNIClc signs: 3
Altemetlve modes of travtl eiluctotlon ~ e . sefe walking. biking. etc.): 3 Flgure5.4 Preferred Safety Measures
Some additional suggested improvements and comments received through the survey are installing additional traffic signals and increasing police presence.

GHD I City of Anderson I 11225875 I Local Road Safety Plan 30 This document is in draft form. The contents, including any opinions, conclusions or recommendations contained in, or which may be implied from. this draft document must not be relied upon. GHO reserves the right, at any time, without notice, to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document. To the maximum extent permitted by law. GHD disclaims any responsibility or liability arising from or in connection with this draft document.

6. Identify Strategies
Through coordination and feedback from the City of Anderson, LRSP stakeholder working group, and public outreach, safety projects and strategies were identified for the Local Road Safety Plan.

The LRSP will reference specific location engineering projects and systemic safety applications. In addition, safety strategies and projects that address the other E's to include Enforcement. Education, Emergency Response, and Emerging Technologies will be discussed below.

6.1 Engineering Strategies
Per the HSIP program, engineering countermeasures are available for grant funding. Per the most recent HSIP Cycle (Cycle 10) the approved countermeasures and crash reduction benefits were quantified in the HSIP analyzer. Priority intersections and segment locations were determined based off the collision analysis and relative severity, public comments, recent safety improvements, and City feedback and recommendations.

Since the next HSIP Cycle 11 is in 2022, further safety analysis should be conducted at that time in refining the collision data and subsequent safety projects and Benefit to Cost Ratios (BCRs).

Countermeasures were evaluated and prioritized based on benefit to cost ratios as prescribed in Caltrans most recent Local Roadway Safety Manual (LRSM). The benefit value of a crash is the expected reduction in crashes with the countermeasure and the associated costs with the crash. Caltrans has opted to use 5 years of observed crashes in estimating future expected crashes. A benefit in reduction of cost can include benefits derived from savings of societal cost (emergency response, medical cost, and property damage). Cost associated with a project is based on planning level estimates of construction cost, planning and environmental cost and costs associated with right-of-way and utilities.

The priority intersections and segment locations were determined based off the collision analysis and relative severity, public comments, recent safety improvements, and City feedback and recommendations.

6.1.1 Identified Challenge/Emphasis Areas
Per the SHSP and the LRSP Working Group, the identified challenge/emphasis areas for the LRSP were as follows:

1. Bicyclists - Bicycling safety countermeasures/projects were recommended at multiple locations.

2. Pedestrians - Providing pedestrian accommodations to include crossing enhancements. other locations for pedestrian improvements are identified in the engineering strategies. Non-engineering strategies to improve pedestrian safety will be discussed in a later section of the report.

3. Intersections - Projects were identified for the top intersections with collision severity and frequency.

4. Aggressive Driving -Aggressive driving can include improper speeds, improper turning and improper passing. Engineering strategies were identified for intersections and segments at locations where these issues were identified. Non-engineering strategies to prevent aggressive driving includes enforcement in selective areas.
a. Assembly Bill (AB) 43 was signed into law by Governor Newsom on October 8, 2021. This bill will change several aspects of speed setting and enforcement in California with a goal to make roadways safer for all road users. The new law is set to go into effect by June 30, 2024 and allows agencies more flexibility with keeping the previous speed limit, allows business and residential districts to have 15 and 20 mph speed limits, and allows the agency to round down the proposed speed limit based on an engineering study due to a high presence of bicycles or pedestrians.

GHD I City of Anderson I 11225875 I Local Road Safety Plan 31 This document is in dral't form. The contents, including any opinions, conclusions or recommendations contained in, or which may be implied from, this dral't document must not be relied upon. GHD reserves Ille right, at any time, without notice, to modify or retract any part or all of the dral'tdocument. To the maximum extent permitted by law. GHD disclaims any responsibility or liability arising from or in connection with this draft document.

5. Distracted Driving - Prevention of distracted roadway usage is addressed though education and enforcement component of the non-engineering strategies. These strategies can be communicated through social media channels and through the schools.

In determining applicable countermeasures for priority locations, these six challenge/emphasis areas were emphasized.

6.1.1.1 Access for Bicyclists and Pedestrians around SR 273 One area of concern for bicyclists and pedestrians identified through the City and the public was the disconnect between the east and west sides of SR 273. SR 273 has two parallel roads (E Center Street and W Center St) and one parallel railroad within close proximity. Connections between the west and east sides of the City are limited to select intersections along SR 273. The bicycle and pedestrian facilities along this route are limited.

The close proximity of the parallel roadways and railroad results in long crossing distances for pedestrians.

The City desires to implement strategies that will increase bicycle and pedestrian safety and access in this area. As discussed in Section 4.1.1, funding was grated for the SR 273 Multimodal Corridor Plan that will aim to develop several multimodal and safety improvements in this area. In addition, several locations along SR 273 were identified in the following section and improvements at these intersections and segments were recommended.

6.1.1.2 Director's Policy 37 (DP-37)
Caltrans adopted Director's Policy 37 (DP-37) on Complete Streets on December 2, 2021. This policy states that "in locations with current and/or future pedestrian, bicycle, or transit needs, all transportation projects funded or overseen by Caltrans will provide comfortable, convenient, and connected complete streets facilities for people walking, biking, and taking transit or passenger rail unless an exception is documented and approved". This policy is aimed at encouraging an increase in walking, biking, and public transit throughout the state. It will impact projects in Anderson moving forward and is aligned with the challenge/emphasis areas in the plan.

6.1.2 Intersection Projects
The locations and characteristics of the eight (8) priority intersections are shown in Table 6.1 below.

GHD I City of Anderson 1112258751 Local Road Safety Plan 32 This document is in draft form. The conten\$, including any opinions. conclusions or recommendations contained in, or which may be Implied from, this draft document must not be relied upon. GHO reserves the right, at any time. without notice, to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document. To the ma~mum extent permitted by law, GHD disclaims any responsibility or liability arising from or in connection with this draft document.

Table 6.1 Priority Intersection Characteristics
Rear End {1) /
Unsafe Speed (1) /
Wrong Side of Road
Stingy Ln Balls Ferry Rd AWSC 61 3 Broadside (1) / {1) / Traffic Signals Hit Object (1) and Signs (1) Pleasant HIiis Dr Rhonda Rd Signal 49 5 Rear End (2) Unsafe Speed (2) Comer Way Wrong Side of Road
Deschutes Rd lWSC 41 2 Head on (2) (1) / Unsafe Lane {West) Change (1) Sideswipe (1) / Unsafe Speed (1) /
North St Ravenwood Ln lWSC 32 3 Broadside (1) / Improper Tumlng (1) Hit Object (1) / Automobile Right
of Way (1)
North St East St AWSC 19 4 Broadside (2) Automobile Right of Way (1)
North St Sliver St lWSC 9 4 Broadside (2) Traffic Signals and Signs (2)
Ca/trans Jur1sd1ct1on
Rear End (3) / Unsafe Speed (2) /
SR273 Bruce St Signal 66 7 Broadside (3) Traffic Signals and Signs (2)
SR273 Marx Way lWSC 56 6 Broadside (3) Automobile Right of Way (4)
SR273 South St Signal 48 9 Broadside (3) Improper Tuming (3) SR273 Ox Yoke Rd Signal 47 7 Rear End (4) Unsafe Speed (3) SR273 North St Signal 47 12 Broadside (5) Unsafe Speed (8) SR273 Factory Outlets Dr Signal 47 12 Rear End (6) Unsafe Speed (6) SR273 Pleasant HIiis Dr Signal 43 B Rear End (4) Unsafe Speed {4> The countermeasures recommended for these locations are presented in Table 6.2.

GHD I City of Anderson 111225875 I Local Road Safety Plan 33 This document is in draft fonn. The contents, induding any opinions, conclusions or recommendations contained in, or which may be implied from. this draft document must not be relied upon. GHD reserves the right, at any time, without notice, to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document. To the maximum extent permitted by law. GHD disclaims any responsibility or liability arising from or in connection with this draft document.

Table 6.2
Sdngy Ln/
Ball1hnyRd
PIHS1ntHlll1
Dr / Rhonda Rd
Com•rW•y
(W•ot)/
Deachutae Rd
Nol1h St I
Ravenwood Ln
North St/ East
St
North St/
Sliver St
Recommended Countermeasures for Priority Intersections
lntorsecfions
Intersections
Intersections
~ersections
Distracted
Dlil/ng
nlersec:tlons
lnlersection.s
Distracted
Dri .. ng
lntersec.Hon1
lnteBeclions
Distracted
Dli~ng
Distracted
Dri~ng
Pedestrians
Pedestrians
Distractld
Dri'4ng
lnlersections
lntersec1ions
Dis1racted
Dlil4ng
ln1ersactians
ln1ersacllans
Pedestrians
Intersections
Distracted
Dn'4ng
Intersections
A"'111tSSiw
Dril4ng /
Sl)ffding
lnterseclions
NS14 lnston raised median on l!j>p!UChes
lnstollTupgracle pedestrian c,osslng at
r,1821PII uncantlOiled lacall1>11s t,Mth enhanced sa!,ity l'oatun,s)
2 """'"' Injury colJslons 11 night, Only 1 light 11 lntenectlan. 1 """'"' Injury colislan due to tta,elling an the v.f009 side al the rood. 1 unsala speed calbian. can help to ntduce speeds by nonov.4ng the raoclway neat the Intersection. v,ilicli could help incf'lt&Se the safety for fhe school crossings,
\Jpgr.de school crossing on no~h log to higt,.,,isibillly crosswalk. Install c:url>bulb ou1s. podesfrian ntluge., and way"nding 0911$ to trail.
frv;fease DUI enforcement at night 2 .. ,.,,. inlury cal~slons with alcohol in,d,.,d. 1 collision d"" to not sfapping at stap sign. lmpn,"' •1
~ "",.;""'f'lt: le~es, ~ck-pla~es ..Uh 2 raar end callislans , The approaches to lhls lntersoclion are on horizontal c:uMS and this S02 rallO!eftaclo"' ba en. mounl,ng, s ze, an countermeasure can help Increase lisibility al signals fw dri,.,,... numbet hltall lllised pa- Mallcen and ,.,;p;ng
S09 guldem811c1 IO< lhe wes1bound loft tum through
the ln1ersac[ on
NSD6
m lall "SIGNAL AHEAD"' signs (WJ-31 on
approaches to !nters..:,Uon
,,..,., back stop bar on Rhonda Rd to bl In line
with ex:lsting median
Imp'°"' pa-nl matkings on epptoaches to
,.,;po out edd"dlanal P8"'mon1
lns11&'upgrade larger or additional 1fop signs or
olh« lntersaction warning/regulatory signs
For left-turning whlcles on westbound left tum to help fllllcle "'hlcles lhrough the ln1erSection.

Horizontal cuMs on all appn,IChes. No c:urren1 signal waffling signs.

Decntase potontial lor head on colli1<ons v,ith WIIS1-lell-tumlng whiclH, Install add~ional s1riplng to help elim na1e confusion on the approaches to lhe Intersection. come~ mid<le lane to a slrip'."ng IMfer on weslbaund appn,ach. lnstal diagonal striping et median on nMhbaund lf'P"'lch.

No current lntenaction wamlng signs on any approachos. All approaches an, on cuMS. lnslaQ W2--1 signs on eastbound and .... ,tbound approaches and W1-7 sign on south end of lntersec11on.

NS12 1111P"'"' pa-nt fncUon (Higll friction Suotace All approaches to lntersec11on ate on cuMs. At a hlgll-sl)ffd, Nral location. Tn1111menls~ NS14 Install raised median (NI appn,aches
Nsoe. lnstolUupgrado l111g9, or add~ional slop signs or olhor ln1eraec1iotl wamlng/regufa1ory signs
NS0f Upgrade lnfers..:,Uon p.....ment markings
lnstalVupgracle pedeslrlan cro11ing el
r,1821PB unconlrdled locations t,Mlh enhanced salety
features)
Consolidate uncontn,Qod cn,ulngs to the norlh
lea
~stall "CROSS "TRAFFIC DOES NOT STOP'
supplement"'Y waming plaque (W4-4P) below
stop sign on minor road approaches
r,asoo• Ewluole lns1amng signals'
NS04 eon ... ~ lnlersoction lo roundaboul (fn>m all way stop)
NS06 lns1a1Vupg,.cle la,ve, or add~ional slop signs or
other lnlers..:,tlan wamlng/regulatoiy signs
NS 14 lns1all reisod median on Oflproaches
NS07 Upgrade Intersection pa.emont m111<ings
lns1a1Vupgrado pedestrian c,ossing at
NS21PB unconlrdled locations t,Mlh enhanced safety
felfures)
2 hood on callls:ons due 10 eastbound "'hiclos lea'4ng lhe lane and calli<ling Villh WIISfbouncJ "'hicles.

No c:umint lntorsaction warning signs on any approeches. The ""s1bound appn,ach Is on• c ......

Install W2-1 signs on norlhbaund and sou1hbound appn,aches. Upgrade stop signs to la,ger sizes on easlbound and W11otbaund approaches.
lnstal •sTOP AHEAD" pa,.,ment m811clng1 an eas1bourld and wes1bound approaches lo ale~ d,i-Ms of upcoming 11/IO-way slop,
Prefened for the unconllOiled cn,sslng on the north leg. lnslall RRFII•. upgrade lo lllgherlisibllity crossing.

Along with upgrades to the nor1hem cn,sswalk this would rediA1ct pedestrians to a mOl9 enhanced crossing and reduce conflict points with pedestrians and -· Alerts drl.ers on minor s1ree1 oflWSC lntersKlian. ln1enKlion could bl mistal<only ln1erpn,1ed as AWSC by clri""' on minor rood due lo the pA1sence al uncontR>lled crossings on major mid. 2 collisions due to automobile right of way liol1tions. Approaches he"' mulUple lanes. Close lo railroad and SR 273.

OR
2 collisions due to automobile right of way liolations. Approaches haw mulUplo lanes. Close fa railroad and SR 273. C.n help •hol1en pedes1rian cn,ssing disfancas for school c,osswab.

OR
1 rear er,d and 2 broadside cc41islons. S~ghl btnd an nMh leg.

Helps 'Mth access management due to close proxlmily of driwways to lnle~ection.

Line assignment markings""' uncle•. lnlerSK1ian Is sWghUy sk-. 1 pedestrian colhion. Upgrade school crouings to hlgh-lislbility.

E.~ t duci •• ~ la N~h st-·• Obs.......i 11,erai depanlng "'hicles c,ossing into approach lane on North S1ntel lntenK1ion Is -,uo e re ng •PP<O-• nos an ~• ,_, sllgh11y skewecl.

NS06 lnslalVupgn,cle larger or add~ional stop signs or 2 collisions from "'hicles faiNng to stop al stop signs. Upgrade stop stgns to larve< size lo bong olher inl=ection wamingl..,gulatory signs additional owarene11 ond 14slbility to lntersec1ion. Install W3-1 signs on Norlh St opproaches.

NS07 Upgrade intersection P""'monl mallcings
k\crease enforcement at Intersection
NS02' Ewluate con...rslon fa all-way STOP control
(rn.m 2-way or Yield control)'
Slripini on approaches lo interseclion Is faded. Reslripe edgelines1 cenle,tines. and bike lanes near inteneetion.
2 collisions from ,.,t,icles failing 10 stop at stop signs, OR
2 collisions tom whicles failing 10 slop al slop signs.

GHD I City of Anderson 1112258751 Local Road Safety Plan 34 This document is m draft fonn. The contents. Including any opinions. conclusions or recommendauons contained in, or which may be implied from. this draft document must not be relied upon, GHD reserves the right, at any time, without notice, to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document. To the maximum extent permitted by law, GHD discla"ms any responsibility or liability arising from or in connection with this draft document.

Ca/trans Junsd1ct1on
lnlenections
lnlerseclions
SR 27J I Sruco lnlOf'leclions
St
Pedestrians
Pede.trians
S02
603
S09
S21PB
1m,,..,.... ,1gno1-.: lensH, mounting, oize,
and number
lmpn,w signal timing (coordination, phases, red,
yeaow, or open,lion)
Install nlised pw.ement martcen and stnplng
(tlvough lntenection)
Modify signal phasing to Implement a Leading
Pedestrian ln1elWI {LPO
3 rear end collislon1.
s........i priorily signalized lnto,sections olong SR 27J.

Intersection is slightly skewed lor minot mad,
1 st\ffll lnju,y pedesMan colfision.

C<>nslder lnstollng curb on inlOf'lection - to 1 1 · ...., 1 · -~• · sepa,ale pedeslrian and """'cl• righl~ St\ffll ""'1 ,-.es oan -•51on. lnlenections NS03· EW!uale inslaling aignala• 4 collisions due lo automobile light of wwy \iololions. Westbound I"" noods lo c,oss 3 lanes al lrallc.

OR
SR273 / Mone Oislracled NS06 lnslalVupan,de larger or additional slop signs or 4 collisions duo to autornobilo right al WWf ,;olalions. l/pgnMlo slop signs lo tar,ior size to bring Way Dming olher lnterH<:tion waming/~atory signs additional awan,ness and \islbiUty lo interseclion.

Cteate direclional median -,ings to ala., (and lnterseclions NS15 restrict) loll-tum• •ntl ,~ 1111111 4 collisions duo lo automobile righl ol VR( \iolollons. Westbound left naeds to cross 3 lanes ol lrallc. lnslall occelerallon~ forwoslboU'ld lefl-tumlng Install directlonol median to restrict le1t-tums forwostbound ,.,.s, SR 2731 South
St
SR273/0•
You Rd
SR 273 / North
lnteneclions
lnlenections
lnler,;ec:liOM
lntenections
Pedestrians
lnten..Uons
lntenecliom
Pedestrians,
Bicyclists
lnten..Uona
lntorsections
lntlf"lections
St Pedestrians,
SR273/
Bicyclists
Pedestrians
Oistrected
OrNng
~ntersections
FaclDry Outlels lntorsections
Dr
S02
S03
S12
S21PB
S02
S03
S20PB
S02
S03
S12
S20PB
602
S03
-· I-Signal hardwolte; lenses, mounting, Site,
end number
lmpro,e signal timing (coordination, phases, red,
yellow, or operation)
lnslell nlised median on -•hes
Modify signal phasing to Implement • leading
Pedestrian lntelWI (LP9
'"-signal hant#ate: lenses, mounting, size,
end number
lmp<o,e slgnol liming (coordination, phases, red,
yellow, or operalion)
lnslall od\oi...., stop bat beror. ctOHwalk
(Bicycle Box)
I"""°"' signal-.: lenses, mounting, sllO,
end number
.....,..... slgnol timlnv (coordi,,.lion, phases, red,
yellow, or operation)
lnsloll rolsed median on llf'll""K'lle•
tnstoll act.ence stop bar before crosswalk
(Bieyclo Boxl
Install "LEFT ON GREEN ARROW ONLY" sign
{R10-15) on signal mast
Install "SIGNAL AHEAO' slgna (W3-31 on
"fl'""'cheS to Intersection
lmpro\e signal-: lenses, mounling, sllO.
and number
lmprow signal liming {coonination, phases. red,
yellow, or operation)
Jntorseclions Upgrade Intersection pa....,,ent markings __ s_R_2l_J_/ __ lnt_ors_ect-lon-,--S-02--lmpro\e olgnol -; tenses, mounling, size, PIHant HIii• end number
Dr lntorsections S03 ~ signal timing {coonination, phases, red, yellow, or Of!!!)lon)
• 1nter.eclian muslmHt CAM.JTCO warrants lo tmpl,men1 counlermHsure SliQht bond on 1oulh leg. lncreasos ,;sibilHy and awannoss to signals, St'9r81 priority signalized lntorsoctions along SR 273.

Install raised median on wesl leg to eliminate lefl-lums rrom W Center St near inlenection. W Center SI Is in \elY close pro>imily to intenection and can add e<ldilional conlict polnls. 2 pedestrian collisions.
4 re• Mid eollisiQfls, 3 Cdlisions due to 1M1Sate speed \iolaUons.

S0\81111 priority signalized intorseclions along SR 273. 1 bicycle collision.
4 INF end collisions. 6 colhions duo to unsafe spoed \iolallons.

S0\81111 priority signalized lnlorsoctions along SR 273. lnslol rolse<t median on Msl leg to eliminate left-turns rrom W Centor St nea, lnlorsectlon. W Center 61 ls In ve,y dose pro>imily lo lnte,secllon and can odd addllonal conllct points. 1 pedestrian coffislon. lnstoll ~ slop bat/Bicycle Box - e<osswalk on south leg. 1 pedeslrian collision due lo whicle failing to yield for pedestrian CIOSSing SR 273. l'lsloll sign for northbomd right turns,
lnslll sign on southbound app,oach. Southbound lffl'Oach on SR 273 ls hlg!Hpoed. 6 rear end colUslona. 6 colfislons duo lo unano spoed ~olatlons, s......i prionty slgnallte<t lnlorseclions along SR 273.

Mlri<lngs !f'P'"' laded. Restripe 'fl"?!'Chts to lntorsectlon. 4 rear end collislona. 4 collisions due lo unsno opoed ~olations.

Se*lll priority signalized intot1octlons along SR 273.

Some of the proposed countermeasures at City intersections are highlighted below.

GHD I City of Anderson I 112258751 Local Road Safety Plan 35 This document Is in draft fonn. The contents, including any op nions. conclusions or recommendations contained in, or which may be implied from, thts draft document must not be relied upon. GHD reserves the right, at any time, without notice, to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document. To the maximum extent permitted by law, GHO disclaims any responsibility or liability arising from or in connection with this draft document.

Improve signal hardware: tenses, back-plates
with retroreflectlve borders, mounting, size,
and number AND Improve signal timing
(coordination, phases, red, yellow, or
operation)
Pleasant Hills Dr I Rhonda Rd·
SR 2731 Bruce St**
• SR 273 / south St ..

SR 273 / Ox Yoke Rd''
• SR 273 / North St ..

SR 273 I Factory Outlets Dr ..
• SR 273 / Pleasant Hills or••
·/rrp'OVi,>ga;gnaJ~lanol-•tlhi•Joc.lion
. .,,,.,1ng--.si.no1-•flllalocalion
Install/upgrade
•
larger or
additional stop signs or
other Intersection
warning/regulatory signs
• Comer Way (West)/
Deschutes Rd
• North St/ Ravenwood Ln
• North St I East St
• North St I Silver St
• SR 273 / Marx Way
Install/upgrade pedestrian crossing
at uncontrolled locations (with
enhanced safety features)
Stingy Ln I Balls Ferry Rd
North St I Ravenwood Ln
North St I East St
Figure 6.1 shows a proposed concept of the recommended striping improvements at the intersection of Rhonda Road and Pleasant Hills Drive.

Figure 6.1 Proposed Striping Concept for the Intersection of Rhonda Road and Pleasant Hills Drive GHD I City of Anderson 111225875 I Local Road Safety Plan 36 Th s document is in draft fonn. The contents, including any opinions, concius·ons or recommendations contained in, or which may be impli.ed from. this draft document must not be relied upon. GHD reserves the right, at any time, without notice, to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document. To the maximum extent permitted by law. GHD discla'ms any responsibility or !a bility arising from or in connection with this draft document.

6.1.3 Segment Projects
Throughout the analysis period, there were 82 collisions reported on City of Anderson roadway segments (nonintersection related). A breakdown of roadway collisions on City streets are included in Appendix B: Collision Data. Priority segments and their crash characteristics for the City of Anderson are displayed in Table 6.3 below.

Table 6.3 Priority Segments Characteristics
Riverside Ave
Ollnda Rd
Rhonda Rd
I.S NB Ramps to
North Rd
City Boundary to
Emtly Rd
Pleasant HI Ill Rd
to South of
Pleasant HI Us Rd
South St to Toyon Balls Ferry Rd St
S Balls Ferry Rd Balls Ferry Rd to
Davey Way
Caltr~rts
SR273
SR273
South Stto
Pleasant HIiis Dr
City Boundary to
Hayes St

0.52 54
0,53 54

0.24 44

0.80 42

0.70 37
5 Hit Object (2)
Hit Object (2) I
5 Vehlcl&-
Pedestrian (2)
5 Broadside (2) I
Hit Object (2)
Head On (1) I
3 Broadside (1) I
Hit Object (1)
Head On (1) I Hit
Object(1) I
Vehlcl&-
Pedestrian (1)
3 lklsafe Speed (2) f
Wrong Slde of Road
(2)
Pedestrian Violation
(2)
Automobile Right or
Way(2)
Wrong Side of Road
(2)
OU~BUI (1)/
Pedestrian Vlolatron
11)

1.05 1180 7

1.43 559 6
Vehlcl~ Pedestrian Violation
Pedestrian (4) (3)
Hit Object (3) tmproper Turning (2)
The countermeasures recommended for these locations are presented in Table 6.4.

GHD I City of Anderson I 11225875 I Local Road Safety Plan 37 This document is in draft form. The contents, induding any opinions, condusions or recommendations contained in, or which may be implied from, this draft document must not be relied upon. GHD reserves the right, at any lime, without noUce, to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document. To the maximum extent permitted by law, GH D disclaims any responsibility or liability arising from or in connection with this draft document.

Table 6.4 Recommended Countermeasures for Priority Segments Riverside Ave Cl· R24 lll$lal CUM ad,,taoce warning signs S NB Ramps to 0.52 R27 Install delneators, reflectors and/or object North Rd) ma.'kers
Additional OU enforcement
R03 lnslal Median Berrh•·
R21 lll1]fow pa,iement (rlction (Hgh Friction
Surface Treatments)
R24 lnslal cuM advance warning signs Olinda Rd CCly
Boundary to
EmllyRd)
0,53 R27 lnstal delneakn, refktctors and/or object
nel!ers
Rhonda Rd
CP!Hsant Hlls
Rd to South of 0.24
Pr.asant Htns
Rd
Balls Ferry Rd
(South St to O.B
RlOPB lnstal l)lldeffian media, renclng on
approaches
R32PB lnstal bike lanes
R24 Install cur;e 1111NMce warning signs
R26 lnslall dynanicllo9riable speed Y,arning signs
lnslal clear slgnage near elemenlary school lo
guide whlcles cllrlng school drop off/pick up
\IIJlden bike lanes
3 colslons near roadway CUM on wastern end of segment (1 was a 98\IBre l'1llfY). 2 oosare speed colsions on cwve section of !leQmenl lnslal on approaches to cur;e. 3 colsions wiere loehicle 'NIS lmdwd wlh e fllll9d object. 3 colslons wlh elcohol lnldwd.
lnstal near Enily Rd to alowfor pedestrian median fencing. 3 colslons at the horizonlal cLnoe, west of Errily Rd. Can help to decrease speeds near the school Ccurrent speed lnit Is 35!lllh),
3 colslons al lie horizontal cuM, west of Ell'ily Rd.
3 colslons et the horlzon\el CUN!t, west of Emly Rd. No current sign on the wesllound approach.
2 hit object colslons. No delneators on ACID canal bridge. 2 colslons from pedestrians cr0$$lng road In lie rrid<te of the horizontal cur,e neer the ACID c•ut This v.il h• to elimlnate these crossings by proo.iding III barrier along the curwture of Iha roactNay that v.il direct pedestrians lo use 8lcisting pe1hways to trawl to and from school.

No 8lcisting bike lanes. In cloa proldrrity to high school.

Colisions a-e concentreled near horizontal cunies on weslern end of segment No e>isting curw aCMnce warning signs.
lns1all v.ill a speed lnit sign for nor1hbound approach ID alett driwrs of their speed before entering hll)h,\OUn& are111 v.ith horizontal cur,,alure.

Al colsions concentrated near school. Obsen.ed flashing beacon near school v.ith no corresponding sign. 2 lbl!!d objects hit In between Shady ln and TO')'on St of lie school from a wong-, \Aolation.

Per public suggestion. Toyon St)
P~ Yollh school for Safe Roules lo School 2 colsions during school pick up hours.

Add segment igtiting 2 colslons at night 11 MS S8Wl'e injury).

S e.lls Ferry
Rd (BaUs Ferry O. 7 Rd to Davey
Way)
Caltrans Jl,r1sdct,on
R15 Widen shoulder
R2l ht1N'OW pa,iement friction (Hgh Friction
Surface TreatmenlS)
R26 lnslal dyn111mlc/varlable speed v.arning signs
R01 Add segment lghHng
R02 R«now or relocate ffJCed objeclS outside of
Clear Recowfy Zone
R31 lnslal edgelne ru,rt,le strips/stripes
SR 273 CSouth
SI to Pleasant 1.05
HIDs Dr) R1CPB lnstal pedes\1an median fencing on
approaches
Per public suggestion, 3 colsions concentrated at curves. Install at cun.es. 3 colsions concentrated at curves. lnstal at curves.
3 colslons concentrated at curves. lnstal on cunie v.aming slgns at approaches lo curves along segment.
4 night colslons Yollh no streetlghls (3 v.ere fafall-e lll)ury).

Speclllcaly near Anderson Creek Bridge, there are many objects In close prOlllrtity lo the roadway. 2 flJCed object colslons near Anderson Creek Bridge.

Concentration ol colsion near Anderson Creek Bridge. lnstel on approach, depenlre. and segment of Jlllderson Creek Bridge edgelnes IO alert driwrs Yttlen they re-the lane. Can reduce colslons from \lehlcles lealing the lane and hitting objects on lie shoulder. 4 pedestrian colslons where pedeslrians v.ere not In the crosswalks (1 fatal and 3 -e Injury). CJ>--i some median fencing on bridge. lnstal additional fencing ti guide pedestrians lo crosswalks.
lnslal sidev.alk/pathway (to !WOid vdcl alon lnstal separated pathway betv.een South St and Bruce St Cno el!lsting pedesvian faciUes at R34PB roadway) ng g this localon). lnstal curb between Bruce St and Bryce Wwy to add venicel separation SR273 (City
Boundary to
Hayes St)

1.43 ROI
R27
Add segment lghting
lnslal delneators. reflectors and/or object
markers
Install raised pawmen1 rneri<ings on 8lcisting
edgeine striping
Close gap In center median north of Briggs St
between pathway and tr111wled v.ay. 4 pedeslrian colslons (1 fatal 111nd 3 severe illU'Y), 2 lnjlry collslons Yollh no shetlights north of: Briggs St. 3 hit object colsions.
5 colslons \\here whicle hit en object. Raised pawment markings can create an audible signal that whlc:les are de98fting lite !Me.
2 owrtumed colislons at this location from whlcles headed south.

Some of the proposed countermeasures at City segments are highlighted below.

GHD I City of Anderson I 11225875 I Local Road Safety Plan 38 This document is in draft fonn. The contents, including any opinions, conclusions or recommendations contained in, or which may be implied from. this draft document must not be relied upon. GHO reserves lhe right, 111t any time, without notice, to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document. To the maximum extent pennitted by law, GHO disclaims any responsibility or liability arising from or in connection with this draft document.

Install curve advance warning
signs
Riverside Ave (l-5 NB Ramps to
North Rd)
• Olinda Rd (City Boundary to
Emily Rd)
Rhonda Rd (Pleasant Hills Rd to
South of Pleasant Hills Rd)
Install dellneators,
reflectors and/or object
markers
Riverside Ave (1-5 NB
Ramps to North Rd)
• Olinda Rd (City Boundary
lo Emily Rd)
SR 273 (City Boundary to
Hayes St)
Add segment fighting
• S Balls Ferry Rd (Balls
Ferry Rd to Davey Way)
• SR 273 {South St lo
Pleasant Hi ts Dr)
• SR 273 (City Boundary lo
Hayes St)
In addition, Figure 6.2 shows the locations of the proposed speed feedback signs in the City. '
Northbound
approach of
Rhonda Road
To alert drivers of
speed before ent6ring
high-volume area with
horizontal curvature
Figure 6.2
r•y-1 l
-....
..
,.,
'
i ..............
, I
cnYOF .!rr1p AMDERSON
,i~
..._,,,
·--= ,-s,g,,
c..-
On curve warning signs
at approaches to curves
on Balls Ferry Road
To alert drivers of speed
difference due to s-shaped
road curve
,,
f "
~ ,.

Locations of Proposed Speed Feedback Signs
GHD I City of Anderson I 11225875 I Local Road Safety Plan 39 This document is in draft form. The contents, including any opinions, conclusions or recommendations contained in. or which may be impl"ed from. this draft document must not be relied upon. GHD reserves the right. al any time. without notice. to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document To the maximum extent permitted by law. GHD disclaims any responsibility or liability arising from or in connection with this draft document

6.1.4 Systemic Safety Countermeasures
When selecting countermeasures, just focusing on locations with current collision issues is a reactive approach to roadway safety planning. A reactive approach targets recent hot-spots and specific problems that are associated with these locations; as a result of this approach, locations with low traffic volumes but with similar safety issues as hot spot locations are not addressed. In order to mitigate collisions in a both a reactive and proactive approach, Caltrans' Local Roadway Safety Manual suggests agencies utilize a comprehensive approach that includes systemic and hot spot location improvements in developing a safety plan.

Some systemic safety countermeasures options are shown in Table 6.5.

Table 6.5
Citywide
Signalized
Intersections
along SR273
Along SR 273
Proposed Systemic Projects
Education
Engineering
Engineering
Engineering
Pedestrian education campaign . . . . (crossing at crosswalks, wearing high- ~aw~I pedestn~n collisions due to pedestnan llisibility clothing at night, etc.) 1.1olat1ons (especially on SR 273) Pedestrian crossing enhancements at H I d d t · 11, · uncontrolled crosswalks e pre uce pe es nan co 1s1ons Install additional safety lighting
Install eclgelines
Many collisions labeled as "Dark - No
Streetlights" and suggested by the City as a
priority
Many locat[ons without edgelines or bike
lanes
Engineering Improve signal timing
Sewral collisions due to traffic signals and
signs 111olations along SR 273. Pedestrians
seem to be getting impatient and crossing
before the pedestrian phase.

Enforcement Increase speed enforcement Many unsafe speed collisions along SR 273 Some locations that can benefit from installing bike lanes include Ferry Street (as an alternate route to North Street), Dodson Lane (per public comment), and W Center Street (as an alternate route to SR 273). A concept of the proposed cross-section for Ferry Street is shown in Figure 6.3. ....... -~- •
8' 2'
Partclnglane 8lkelane Dttve tane DrlW lane eite ltM Par1dng i.ri.

Figure 6.3 Ferry Street Concept

6.1.5 Projects Suggested through Public Input
The interactive map tool on the public website for the plan gathered many suggestions from residents of the City for areas of improvement. These suggestions were summarized and are shown in Table 6.6 below.

GHD I City of Anderson I 11225875 I local Road Safety Plan 40 This document is in draft form. The contents. including any opinions, conclus.ons or recommendations con1ained in, or which may be implied from, this draft document must not be relied upon. GHO reserves 1he right, at any time. without notice. to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document. To the maximum ex1en1 permitted by law, GHD disclaims any responsibility or liability arising from or in connection wilh this draft document Table 6.6 Projects Suggested through Public Input
Suggestion I Locat,oo I Pnonty
I Location
(µer co//1s1on
analysis)
Evaluate installation of new/additional stop North St at Oak St signs
Speed management Pinon Ave
Martha St
Rupert Rd near Anderson River Park
Additional enforcement North St at East St y
Install pedestrian crossing signal/RRFB North St at Oak St North St at Ravenwood Ln y
Install additional pedestrian facilities Briggs St near fairgrounds (sidewalks, crossings, etc.} Rupert Rd, north of Stingy Ln Stingy Ln from Bay St to Silo Ct
Oak St at walking path crossing
1-5 interchange at North St
Evaluate/enforce traffic signs Balls Ferry Rd at Shady Ln Stingy Ln at Bay St
Mitigate turning movements SR 273 at Marx Way* y
Install permissive left turn SR 273 approach to Pinon Ave• Widen shoulder $-curves on Balls Ferry Rd y
Install/widen bike lanes Balls Ferry Rd, east of South St y Rupert Rd
Dodson Ln near Wildcat Canyon Reg Park
Install sharrows Balls Ferry Road near 1-5 y
Parking lot of Anderson River Park
Rupert Rd near Anderson River Park
Dodson Ln near Wildcat Canyon Reg Park
Provide frequent, reliable bus/rail service Between the cities of Shasta Lake and Cottonwood Create route for bicyclists and pedestrians Parallel to SR 273* From schools to Anderson River Park
From Rhonda Rd Shopping Center to Shasta Gateway
Shopping Center
Upgrade pedestrian crossing Balls Ferry Rd at Stingy Ln *Location is either fullylparlially not in City jurisdiction GHD I City of Anderson I 11225875 I Local Road Safety Plan 41 This document Is in draH fonn. The contents, includ ng any opinions. conclusions or recommendations contained in, or which may be implied from. this draft document must not be relied upon. GHD reserves the right, at any time, without notice, to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document. To the maximum extent permitted by faw. GH D dlsclaims any responsibiEty or ~ability arising from or in connection with this draft document.

6.2 Non-Engineering Strategies
A comprehensive approach to selecting countermeasure recognizes that not all safety issues can be addressed through infrastructure improvements. The comprehensive approach to safety involves the 5 E's of traffic safety. Besides engineering safety countermeasures, it is important to recommend safety countermeasures to coincide with the other safety E's.

6.2.1 OJ

6.2.2 6.2.3
Education
Education strategies are listed below.

Pedestrian education campaign
• Street crossing do's and don'ts, wearing bright clothing at night, etc.

Bicyclist education and resources
Safe Routes to School maps and outreach at schools
Social media blasts with quick education tool for all users Dangers of speeding/speed management campaigns
Driver education through distracted driving campaigns
• Can be during Distracted Driving Awareness Month in April Emerging Technologies
Possible emerging technologies strategies are listed below.

Invest in a record keeping program to help create a comprehensive collision database ITS infrastructure, web/mobile application (apps) and smart cities practices Crash warning system
Changeable message signs
Bicycle detection
Upgraded controllers for flashing yellow arrows and leading pedestrian intervals Installing touchless Accessible Pedestrian Signals
Enforcement
Enforcement strategies are listed below.

Targeted speed enforcement
• Focus areas can include: school zones, areas of concern for residents (based on public feedback)
Focused DUI check points or routine stops
Increasing number of traffic enforcement officers
• Can be funded through Police Traffic Services grant from the Office of Traffic Safety
Distracted driving enforcement
GHD I City of Anderson 1112258751 Local Road Safety Plan 42 This document is in draft fonn. The contents, including any opinions, conclusions or recommendations contained in, or which may be implied from. this draft documant must not be relied upon. GHO reserves the right. at any lime. without notice. to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document. To the maximum extent pennitted by law. GHD discla ms any responsibility or liability arising from or in connection with this draft document.

6.2.4 0
Emergency Response
Emergency response strategies are suggested below.

Emergency preemption at signalized intersections
Ability to administer life saving measures on-site of a collision Disaster preparedness plan
GHD I City of Anderson I 11225875 I Local Road Safety Plan 43 This document is in draft form. The contents, induding any opinions, condusions or recommendations contained in, or which may be implied from, this draft document must not be relied upon. GHD reserves the right, at any time, wilhout notice, to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document. To the maximum extent permitted by law, GHD disdaims any responsibility or liability arising from or in connection with this draft document.

7. Prioritize and Incorporate Strategies

7.1 Funding Sources
The City of Anderson can look for opportunities to incorporate safety enhancements with the Capital Improvement Program. However, it is noted that funding is very limited and typically used from roadway paving.

Additional funding opportunities can come through grant funding to include HSIP, ATP, and CMAQ.

The primary source of potential funding for projects recommended in this plan is HSIP funding. Each cycle has available project funding for Benefit to Cost Ratio (BCR) and funding set-aside projects. BCR projects use expected benefit and estimated cost to determine eligibility and likelihood for receiving funding. The expected benefit is determined using the crash history and the predicted collision reduction from the recommended countermeasures. On the other hand, funding set-aside projects do not require a collision history. However, for HSIP Cycle 10, the maximum funding amount per agency for set-asides was considerably less than the funding amount per agency for BCR projects. The available set-aside projects from this cycle were Guardrail Upgrades, Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements, Installing Edgelines, and Tribes.

ATP funding for engineering projects is primarily for installing or improving non-mobilized transportation infrastructure. Projects are more likely to receive this type of funding if it helps to increase the number of walkers and bikers, is in a disadvantaged community, or improves the safety of children, specifically at school zones. Ultimately, the goal of this funding is to increase the use of active transportation travel. 7 .2 Prioritized Projects
In evaluating how to implement safety projects, prioritized lists of projects are included in below. Table 7.1 contains a prioritized list of the proposed intersection projects and BC Rs and Table 7 .2 shows a prioritized list of the proposed segment projects and BC Rs. These tables also show potential funding opportunities. It should be noted that upgrading pedestrian push buttons and installing ADA improvements at signalized intersections are not current HSIP countermeasures. However, these improvements can be included in a Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements set-aside project provided the cost does not exceed 20% of the total project cost.

In addition, the last HSIP call for projects, Cycle 10, the awarded projects through the BCR application started at a BCR of 12. Even though the minimum for the grant application was a BCR of 3.5, the projects submitted were very competitive. Some of this was due to funding shortfalls with COVID lockdowns and the HSIP grant application deadline extension which allowed more agencies to submit. Therefore, the maximum project cost is also included for a BCR of 10.

Low-cost systemic countermeasures are preferred by Caltrans in the HSIP process.

GHD I City of Anderson 111225875 I Local Road Safety Plan 44 This document is in draft form. The contents, including any opinions, conclusions or recommendations contained in, or which may be implied from, this draft document must not be relied upon. GHD reserves lhe right, at any time, without notice. to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document. To the maximum extent permitted by law. GHD disclaims any responsibility or liability arising from or in connection with this draft document.

Table 7.1 Priority of City Intersection Projects
Add intorH<:li0<1 lighUng 100%
Stingy Ln I llall• Install raised median on __...,hos
Ferry Rd lnstalUupgn,de pedeslrian cros'sing at uncontrolled locations (with enhen<:ed saloty faahQS) $1.114,530 85.7 $11,145,301 $130,000 100% - PCE y
Increase DUI onfoR:oment at nioht'
lmprow signal h-.: lansH. back-pates 'Mth retronlllecth.e bo<dors, mOW\ting, sizo. and number 100% PIHant HIii• Or/ Install raised -monl mark•,. and slriping gulclemark1 forthe westt,c,..,d loft tum th""'l)h tho 100% in1orsoc1ion $86,471 30.2 $864,707 $28,600 Rhonda Rd lnslali "SIGNAL AHEAtT signs (W:,.3) on approac/los to inl..,.ocUon2 M0'9 l>acl< stop bar on Rhonda Rd lo be in lino v.ilh existing median' lmPIO"" pa•ment markings on appn,achos to stripe out odditional p,r,,11n,mt• Co W (W It} lnslalVupgnde latgor or additlonal stop signs or other intorsaciion waminglregi.lato,y signs 100% ,:~h:, R~ lmPIO"" pawmom friction (High Friction Surface T...atments) $515.052 61.0 $5.1II0,519 $34,500 100% Install raised moclan Otl approaches
(Wade
lnslalUupgrade
lntorsoclion
large,
pa
or
...
odditlonal
mont markings
stop signs orolhor inlorsoction Wllfflinglr9gulalo,y signs 100% 100%
- North St/ lnslalUupgrade pedestrian crossing at \.nCOlll~lod locations (with enhanced saloty lnluAtsj $492,"65 88.4 $4.924,1152 $50,050 - PCE y
Ravenwood Ln Consolidate unconlrolled crossings lo tho north log PCE Install "CROSS lRAFFIC DOES NOT STOP" suppomonta,y wwning plaque (W4-4PI below stop sign on minor road--.'
E""uata lnstailing signals (mu$/ meet CA 1,UTCD "9mlnll), OR $30.720 0.7 $307,201 $422.SO(I 100% Con'All lntOBoction to RlWldabout (tom oil way stop), OR I/Olume -dale ....iume - M>IUJM<lala - $2,600,000 Varies
data
North St / EHt St lnstolUupgn,de la,vor or additional stop signs or oth"' lntetSoction Wllffling/19Qulato,y , tgns• 100% Install raised ,nedian on __...,hos 90%
Upgrade lntorsocllon pawmont morklngs $42.833 8,6 $42$.327 $65,000 100% lnstolUupgn,cle pedestrian crosiing at un<:onltollod locations <,.;th anhanced soloty r.at1•u) 100% PCE y E...,.uat, rodu<:lng 1pproach lanes on N011h Stteot
lnslolVupgrade larger or 1dcitlonal slop signs or other inlorsoclion wamingln,gulatory sons 100% North St I Sliver St Upgrade lnlorsoction ~ment mosl<ings $8,758 4.5 $87.581 $19.500 100% Increase enfon:emont o\ 1nt0Beclion 1
, OR
E'""uo\o con~ion to al'- BTOP control (mint meet CA MUTCD ... ,,.m,) $12,,080 9.3 $120.800 $13.000 100% C:1/trans Junsd1ct10(I
lmP"""' signal hanlwaro: lenses, mounting, size, and number 100% lmprow slgnal timing (coordination, phases, fed, yalow, or operation) 50% SR 273 / Bnlce SI Install raised _,.,.nt matkors and striping Ohrough Intersection)' $252,,l)Q6 ».5 $2,520.056 $101,250 100% Modifof signal phasing lo lmploment • Leading Pedestrian lntoMI (tPQ 100% PCE y CO<lsklor inslalling curb on Intersection como,s to s-t• pedestrian and ...t,lda right-oJ.wly PCE 1: .. ualo lnstolling signals (musl meel CA 1,UTCD .,.,,.nt,), OR $86.976 2.1 $869,7111 $422,500 100% SR 2731 M W lnstolUupgrado larger oi additional slop signs or other intetSoction wamlnglr9g..-ato,y signs 100% 1"' •Y Create dl...ctlonal median openings lo allow (and nstrict) left-tums and.,. tums • OR $155.832 47,9 $1,558.321 $32,e(IO lmp,ow
Install accoloration
slgM hardware:
lane for
fen•••·
woslbound
mounta'lg,
loft.tuining
siie, and
-•'
number 100%
- SR 273 / South St lmprow signal liming (-ion, phases, fed, yelow, or operaUon)' $344.728 3"4.2 $3.447.2711 $100,750 50% Install raised median on __...,hos 90%
Modify oignol phasing to Implement a L.aading Pedestrian lnteMI (LPQ 100% PCE y SR 273 / Ox Yoke lmprow signal hardware: lenses. mowiting, size, and number 100% Rd lmP"""' olgnal timing {coordination, phases. rad, yelow. or operation) $37,234 4.4 13'12,336 $84,500 50% Install adwnc:o slop bat_,. crouWlllk (Bicycle Box) 100% y lmprvw sl11nal hardware: lonus, mourning, slu, and numbe< 100% lmPIO"" signal timing (coordination, phases. rad, yelow, or operation)' 5011\ SR273/ North St Install raised me<lan on approaches $78,306 7.7 1783,059 S1~ ,050 90~ Install Id...,.. slop !>or bebnl cmsswolk {Bicycle Bax) 100% y Install "LEFTON GREEN ARROW ONLY" •lgn (RI0-15) on signal mast' lnsloll "SJQNAL AHEAl:r signs (W3-3) on approaches to intorsecUon' SR 27J / Factory lmprvw signal h...iware: lonsos, moLW1ting. size, and number 100% lmPIO"" signal timing (coordnatlon. phases, Atd, yolow, or opera1ion) $34,ne 3.8 $347,764 $91,000 50% OuUetsDr Upgrade lntonection -m•nt marking•' SR 273 / PIHant lmprow signal hanlware: lenses, mourning. size, and number $31,824 4.1 $318.238 $78,000 100% Hll•Dr lmPIO"" signal liming (coordination. phasas, Atd, yelow, or operation) 50% ' Non-engineering countOITIINSUAt
1 Not HSIP Cycle 10 cOllntem,easun
1 Nol incfudtd in p,oiect beneftt. as HSIP ,pplications limit 1h11 number of countemiea.suntS lo 3 • Includes 30% contingency
.. PCE i::: Pedestrian Crossing Enhancem1nl1
GHD I City of Anderson I 11225875 I Local Road Safety Plan 45 This document is in draft fonn. The contents, including any opin ons, condusions or recommendations contained in. or which may be implied from, this draft document must not be relied upon. GHO reseNes the right, at any lime, without notice, to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document. To the maximum extent permitted by law . GHO disclaims any responsib~ity or liability arising from or in connection w·th this draft document Table 7.2 Priority of City Segment Projects
RnnsldeAve(J.5 Install CUYt acilancew.mnoSi!JIS
NB._.... to North lrwldelnealors. r4lfleclm nfcr oijlcl rrabn Rd) MOIIClrlal DU "'crcerrant'
OlndORd (CIJ
Boundllly to E"'Y
Rd)
RhmdeRd
(~tHllsRd
to soutllof
~tHllsRd)
lnslal Medan Bllrrler'
IIIIIW8 PMlfflltfl1dion (H"' Ridlon Sutace Treal!l'lril) lnstalCUYt acitance-8naSilr6'
lnslal Clelnaatora rellld<n ancrcr olild mrt.ers'
lnslall)ldestnan rredllllfenci\gon IIA)roaches
lnstal bit. lanes
Adel aeglll!llt l!tl'lno
SR u., ISodll 51 to RBnwe er reioca1e liled otiects ~._ d ca. ReaMn 2ma • PIIIIISaal Hila DI) lnStll lCIDllllna lll'lUe stlos/drloes lnstal DeCleSlrlan rredlanlencilocn ;aroadm~
lnstalslclawalNpalMB/ (ID aiddWltlng alongroadMI)'•
Adel seglll!llt ll!tl•no
SR 113 (Cit, lnstaldetne;ilcra, relledm nfcr oijed IIBltilll Boundlly to Heres SI) lnslalrasad Da/9l'TB1I rralllnas en a!linaedr:Jelnamtdno' Close 03D In aner rredlan north d 81cm si
' Ncn-enaineerino coinenreaue
' ~ I-SIP 0,cte 10 to111ler~e
' ~ i'ldJclilclln lll'Cied benefit as l-61P illllllcalcns 1ml h! ruTt>er d CCU1emeaiuesto 3 • 1nw:1es 30% ccr1n!le0cr
-pee = Pedestrian oossna EJ'ta'lcen'elU
S181, 7'o1 60.8
100%
100W.

P)Z912 5. 1 SJ.029. 116 $5114, 198 100%
1~
90'M,
90'M,
100W.
$225,948 96.6 $2,259, <481 $23,'400
100W. -
WA WA ~A $32.500
10CM -
$6'21,972 5.6 16.219,719 $932.100 90'lf,
100%
1<W
10CM
90'!6
$3,350,806 29.3 533,!JOll,058 $1,144,000 100W.
90'M,
90'lf,
1IXl'Mt
~'104 1.5 $927,042 $603,2)() 1IXl'Mt
GHD I City of Anderson I 11225875 I Local Road Safety Plan 46 This document is in draft form. The contents, including any opinions, conclusions or recommendations contained in, or which may be implied from, this draft document must not be relied upon. GHD reserves \he right, at any time, without notice. to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document. To the maximum extent permitted by law, GHD disclaims any responsibility or liability arising from or in connection with th;s draft document. y
y
y
y
y
y

8. Evaluation Process
To evaluate the success of this plan, yearly collision analysis, along with requests for public feedback, can take place and be compared to the established goals.

CIEi0 Goal: Improve safety around schools with a connected multimodal system, enhanced crossings, and education and enforcement
Measure of Success: An evaluation of the improvements of multimodal transportation infrastructure around schools will capture effectiveness of this goal. 8 Goal: Strive toward zero fatal and severe injury collisions citywide e
0 8
0 0
Measure of Success: This can be achieved by smaller reductions of 1 fatal or severe injury (FSI) collision reduction per year.

Goal: Reduce speeding collisions through engineering, enforcement, education, and emerging technologies strategies
Measure of Success: This goal will be effective if there is a decrease in collisions due to MUnsafe Speed" violations after implementing speed management strategies outlined in this plan.

Goal: Improve multimodal transportation safety by expanding the City's non~motorized transportation infrastructure
Measure of Success: If this goal is successful, residents will express an increased feeling of safety while using Anderson's multimodal transportation systems and the number and severity of collisions each year will decrease.

Goal: Increase walking, biking, rolling (wheelchair, skateboard, scooter, etc.) to downtown district, to work, and to school
Measure of Success: The City will see an increase in alternate modes of travel if this goal is successful.

Goal: Reduce pedestrian and bicycle collisions with enhanced crossings, multimodal accommodations, and lighting
Measure of Success: If the improvements outlined in the plan are implemented, and a corresponding decrease in pedestrian and bicycle collisions occurs, this goal will be successful.

Goal: Improve the health and vitality of our community with a safe, sustainable, and equitable multimodal transportation system for all users of the public roadways Measure of Success: Residents report that they feel can easily and comfortably reach their destinations, using various modes of travel.

GHD I City of Anderson I 11225875 I Local Road Safety Plan 47 This document is in draft form. The contents. including any opinions. condus ons or recommendations contained in, or which may be implied from. this draft document must not be relied upon. GHD reserves the right. at any time, without notice, to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document. To the maximum extent permitted by law, GHD disclaims any responsibility or liabnity arising from or in connection w th this draft document. e Goal: Reduce broadside collisions with the appropriate traffic control device, signage and pavement markings, improved sight distance, and lighting
Measure of Success: This goal will be effective if there is a decrease in "Broadside" collisions after implementing strategies outlined in this plan
Goal: Residents report they have safe, comfortable, convenient routes on local roads where they are walking, biking, rolling, or driving
Measure of Success: An increase in the number of residents that report they are comfortable using alternate modes of travel will achieve this goal.

GHD I City of Anderson 111225875 I Local Road Safety Plan 48 This document is rn draft form. The contents, including any opmions, conclusions or recommendations contained in, or which may be implied from, this draft document must not be relied upon, GHD reserves the right at any time, without notice, to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document To the maximum extent permitted by law. GHD disclaims any responsibility or 11:ability arising from or In connection w ith this draft document.

9. Next Steps
The City of Anderson hopes to send the Local Road Safety Plan to City Council for adoption on January 18, 2022. This safety plan will be a living document and will guide the City's roadway safety needs for the next five years. It will be updated as needed and the goals will be monitored.

GHD I City of Anderson 1112258751 Local Road Safety Plan 49 This document is in draft fonn. The contents,, including any opinions, condusions or recommendations contained in. or which may be implied from, this draft document must not be relied upon. GHD reserves the right, at any lime, without notice, to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document. To the maximum extent permitted by law, GHO disclaims any responsibility or liability arising from or in connection with this draft document.

10. References
Recent/Planned Projects
• Shasta Regional Transportation Agency, "SR-273 Multimoda1 Corridor Plan·, https://www.srta.ca.gov/353/SR-273-Multimodal-Corridor-Plan Traffic Data
• City of Anderson Collision Data, Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System, 2015-2020. • City of Anderson Collision Data, Transportation Injury Mapping System, 2015-2020. • City of Anderson Collision Data, City of Anderson Police Department, 2015-2020.

Plans/Manuals/Articles
• "Developing Safety Plans, A Manual for Local Rural Road Owners", Federal Highway Administration, March 2012, http://safety .fhwa. dot. gov/local_rural/training/fhwasa12017 /. • 2020-2024 California's Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP), "California Safe Roads: 2020-2024 Strategic Highway Safety Plan", Caltrans.
• "Local Roadway Safety, A Manual for California's Local Road Owners", Caltrans, Version 1.5, April 2020
• "Highway Safety Manual", American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHTO), 151 Edition, 2014 supplement.
• "California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD)", Revision 5, 2014. • "2018 Regional Transportation Plan & Sustainable Communities Strategy for the Shasta Region", Shasta Regional Transportation Agency, October 2018.
• "City of Anderson Pedestrian Accessibility & Safety Master Plan·, Wood Rodgers & Duane K.

Miller, September 2011.
• "City of Anderson 2007 Bicycle Transportation Plan", City of Anderson, 2007. • "City of Anderson General Plan 2007", City of Anderson, May 2007. • "Director's Policy 37", Caltrans, December 7, 2021.

Websites
• California Department of Transportation, "Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP)", https://dot.ca.gov/programs/safety-programs/shsp.
• California Department of Transportation, "Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) and Systemic Safety Analysis Report Program (SSARP)", https ://dot. ca. gov/programs/local-assistance/fed-and-stateprog rams/highway-safety-improvement-program/local-roadway-safety-plans. • California Department of Transportation, "HSIP Cycle 1 O", https://dot.ca.gov/programs/localassistance/fed-and-state-programs/highway-safety-improvement-program/apply-now. • City of Anderson Local Road Safety Plan, https://lrsp.mysocialpinpoint.com/Anderson.

GHD 1 City of Anderson 111225875 I Local Road Safety Plan 50 This document is in draft form. The contents, induding any opint0ns. conclusions or recommendations contained in, or which may be implied from. this draft document must not be relied upon, GHD reserves the right, at any time, without notice, to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document To the maximum extent permitted by law. GHO disclaims any responsibility or liability arising from or in connection with this draft document. • Institute of Transportation Engineers, https://www.ite.org/technical-resources/topics/safe-systems/.

Surveys
• Local Road Safety Plan Project Survey, https://lrsp.mysocialpinpoint.com/Anderson.

GHD I City of Anderson 1112258751 Local Road Safety Plan 51 This document is in draft fonn. The contents, including any opinions, condusions or recommendations contained in. or which may be implied from. this draft document must not be relied upon. GHO reserves the right, at any time, without notice, to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document. To the maxfmum extent permitted by law, GHO disclaims any responsibility or liability arising from or in connection with this draft document.

Appendix A
Stakeholder and Public Input
GHD I City of Anderson I 112258751 Local Road Safety Plan This document is in draft form The contents, including any opinions, conclusions or recommendations contained in, or which may be implied from, this draft document must not be relied upon. GHD reserves the right, at any time without notice, to modify or retract any part or alt of the draft document To the maximum extent permitted by law. GHO disclaims any responsibility or liability arising from or in connection with this dreft document.

Meeting Summary
May 28, 2021
A utllor
Meeting info
Kathryn Kleinschmidt
May 27, 2021 from 2 p.m. to 4 p.m.
11225875
Anderson Local Road Safety Plan -
Working Group Meeting #1 Summary
The following is GHD's understanding of the discussions and decisions for the above referenced meeting.

Please notify GHD of any discrepancies in the information recorded.

This meeting record has been prepared to serve as documentation for the virtual meeting conducted on May 27, 2021 via Microsoft Teams platform. A PowerPoint presentation was used to focus the discussion.

All participants attending virtually, no sign-in sheet was circulated. Rather, the list of attendees will be provided at the end of this document.

1. Introductions
a. Safety Champion/Project Manager for the City - Matt Baker b. LRSP stakeholder group members
i. Discussed potential improvements to SR 273

1. Potential for projects through the Strategic Partnerships Grant (part of the Sustainable Transportation Program)
a. Both grants from SRTA and Caltrans would be ideal, but SRTA hopes to proceed if they only get the grant

2. Shasta Living Streets hopes to host a workshop with California Walks and UC Berkeley SafeTrec for SR 273 South
a. Considers multimodal transportation from downtown Redding to Anderson
c. Role and interest in serving on this committee
i. Priorities of stakeholders

2. Background
a. LRSP Process
i. Focused Challenge Areas per Strategic Safety Highway Plan b. Purpose of LRSP
i. Engages stakeholders representing all E's and other local community stakeholders (neighboring jurisdictions, advocacy groups, and officials) in developing a plan of action to increase safety and create a prioritized list of projects.

3. Establish Vision, Goals, and Priorities
a. Identify a vision, goals, and mission statement for the LRSP i. LRSP needs a vision, goals, and mission statement to guide the document

1. Add goal for "Creating safe networks"

2. Input to add a priority associated with the goals and objectives a. We will need to consider the time and resources associated and ~ The Power of Commitment
11225875
ensure that they match the objectives
b. Any steps of action towards goals can be considered progress ii. Identify countermeasures to correlate to emphasis area

1. Engineering, Enforcement, Emergency Response, Education, and Emerging Technologies (5Es)
b. HSIP grant funding for safety projects
i. Prioritize based on B/C ratio and citizen feedback?

1. GHD will quantify estimated benefits through the HS/P Analyzer I Ca/trans Local Roadway Safety Manual and include results in the LRSP

4. Collision Analysis
a. Past 5 complete years
i. City Roadway Collisions vs. Caltrans Roadway Collisions

1. Some collisions from Anderson Police Department are excluded at the time due to a lack of information
ii. Fatal and Severe Injury Collision Locations

1. Many collisions near Anderson Creek Bridge
a. Creek prevents pedestrians/bicyclists from taking parallel routes to SR 273
iii. Top Violation Categories
iv. Collision Lighting
v. Pedestrian Collisions
vi. Bicycle Collisions
i. Near residential housing, school, commercial destinations ii. Only creek crossings are at Emily Rd and SR 273

1. Emily Rd crossing can sometimes close when creek
overflows during winter months
a. Causes only available creek crossing to be at
SR273
b. Top ranking intersections and segments
i. People coming into town at the southern end are unfamiliar with the intersection of Rhonda Rd and Pleasant Hills Dr
c. Other Areas of Concern
i. Areas identified by citizen complaints/concerns?

1. City has received several calls on North St between 1-5 and SR 273 a. 2 uncontrolled crosswalks (at Oak St and Martha St)
i. Residents are concerned due to a lack of lighting

1. Countermeasures considered include requesting
PG&E to install lighting and installing Rectangular
Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs)
ii. Potential to use HSIP set-aside funding at these locations d. Identify the approach to evaluating collisions (spot, systemic, or comprehensive) i. Currently using a comprehensive approach

1. Identify areas people want to travel but avoid because they feel they are unsafe
a. Can be done through public outreach, systemic analysis, or determining preferred routes

2. Consider determine crash rates
a. Need to see if the City has raw data
i. Can also use data from the Shasta Regional Traffic Demand Model
ii. Implement low-cost safety countermeasures systemically

5. How Will the Plan be Updated and Monitored?
a. Living document that is updated as needed
b. Official update every 5 years
-+ The Power of Commitment
11225875 2
c. LRSP schedule for completion

6. Other Items to Discuss
a. Public Outreach
i. Public website will likely go live soon
ii. Encourage input through different avenues
b. Next Meeting
Next Steps
a. Send any information regarding projects on SR 273
b. Establish Mission, Vision, and Goals
a. Survey sent to stakeholders
c. Promote public website to gather public input on roadways List of Attendees

1. Matt Baker - Engineering Services Manager, City of Anderson

2. Jesse Solorio - Traffic Operations Engineer, Caltrans District 2

3. Dan Wayne - Senior Planner, Shasta Regional Transportation Agency

4. Michael Kuker -Associate Transportation Planner, Shasta Regional Transportation Agency

5. Anne Thomas - Executive Director, Shasta Living Streets

6. Kathryn Kleinschmidt - Project Manager, GHD

7. Emily Darke - Transportation Engineer, GHD
-+ The Power of Commitment
11225875 3
Meeting Summary
September 14, 2021
Author
Meeting info
Kathryn Kleinschmidt
September 14, 2021 from 10 a.m. to 12
p.m. ' ' '
Project no
SubJect
11225875
Anderson Local Road Safety Plan -
Working Group Meeting #2 Summary
The following is GHD's understanding of the discussions and decisions for the above referenced meeting.

Please notify GHD of any discrepancies in the information recorded.

This meeting record has been prepared to serve as documentation for the virtual meeting conducted on September 14, 2021 via Microsoft Teams platform. A PowerPoint presentation was used to focus the discussion.

All participants attending virtually, no sign-in sheet was circulated. Rather, the list of attendees will be provided at the end of this document.

1. Introductions
a. Safety Champion/Project Manager for the City - Matt Baker b. LRSP Stakeholder Working Group members

2. 1•t Meeting Summary
a. Meeting Summary
i. Challenge/emphasis areas

1. Bicyclists

2. Pedestrians

3. Intersections

4. Aggressive Driving I Speeding

5. Distracted Driving
ii. Sample mission, vision, and goals
iii. Collision analysis

1. Past 6 years of collisions collected
b. Guiding principles
t Finalize mission, vision, and goals

1. Working group prefers option 2 for vision

2. Consider rewording mission to ~ ... safe, sustainable, and equitable ... "

3. Add a motto to the plan

4. Prefer Option 2 of goals

3. Recent Developments
a. Public website engagement
t Overall engagement

1. 25 comments and 7 survey responses
Ii. Summarized interactive map comments

1. Majority of comments were related to driving
-+ The Power of Commitment
11225875

2. Top comment locations
a. North Street at Oak Street
b. Stingy Lane
iii. Summarized survey results

1. Top roadway issues identified
a. Intersections
b. Distracted Driving

2. Class I path parallel to Rupert Road
a. Consider wayfinding signs
b. Consider adding sidewalk on north side of Stingy Lane c. Consider enhanced crossing from residential to Stingy Lane d. Take a closer look at Balls Ferry Road at Stingy Lane e. Trail will eventually be a road
f. Good location for HSIP crossing enhancement (bulb-outs, pedestrian refuge, high visibility crosswalks, etc.)

3. Most responses indicate somewhat uncomfortable with using alternate modes of travel

4. Most responses indicate not willing to use alternate modes of travel

5. Most responses indicate very comfortable using a motor vehicle

6. Preferred safety measure was speed enforcement by the police department iv. Planned Projects

1. Caltrans successful in grant for $500,000 for southern section of SR 273 a. SRTA is finalizing admin side with Caltrans to consolidate money between grant for northern end and southern end
b. RFP is planned to come out this fall/early winter for a consultant c. SRTAwill eventually circulate scope of work with Anderson and other cities
d. Planning should begin next year

4. Safety Countermeasures
a. Methodology
i. Combination of collision analysis, public comments, recent safety improvements, and City feedback
b. Priority locations
i. 6 City and 7 Caltrans intersections
ii. 5 City and 2 Caltrans segments
c. Proposed countermeasures
i. Priority intersections

1. Improve signal hardware and timing

2. Install/upgrade intersection signage

3. Install/upgrade pedestrian crossing
ii. Priority segments

1. Install curve advance warning signs

2. Install delineators, reflectors, and/or object markers

3. Add segment lighting

4. Install speed feedback signs

5. Install bike lanes on Ferry St
a. Consider adding 2' bike buffer on either side of bike lane and reduce lane widths to 1 O'
b. Select alignments that make sense as a network
i. More likely to be funded through SRTA
ii. Continuity in paths is important
c. Consider guiding public input on the map
iii. Systemic locations
iv. Public suggestions

1. No way to head north on SR 273 from apartment complex on Marx Way, aside from turning right and taking a U-turn at next intersection -+- The Power of Commitment
11225675 2
v. Non-engineering

1. Education
a. Sara will reach out if there are any partnership opportunities

2. Emerging Technologies

3. Enforcement

4. Emergency Response

5. Next Steps
a. Draft LRSP document
List of Attendees

1. Matt Baker -City of Anderson

2. Jesse Solorio - Caltrans, District 2

3. Dan Wayne - Shasta Regional Transportation Agency

4. Michael Kuker - Shasta Regional Transportation Agency

5. Anne Thomas- Shasta Living Streets

6. Sara Sundquist- Shasta County Health and Human Services

7. Kathryn Kleinschmidt- GHD

8. Emily Darke - GHD
..,+ The Power of Commitment
11225875 3
VHeb lllb'II
~ ' 'o,_, '<,, ~' '
", .! />r; .~ , $. , .,. , ., ,
.,
- ~> G u I~ <
I
• 1,/ ,. VALLEY
,.,
J
I
•
<o' 'l,,i>
..
t.
..
·t: c-,
F;.. 7J ' ~ ~ (. c, ,.. "' "<;!
" " \
~~
<:;./

CITY OF

ANDERSON
,no
" - - - -Pe,cc i.ewrmcrc -. .)
~Ptqn,crl»e,,mcr~S,,,.. ·- ~Dluft'Mi,StZI
Q-dW:.:SKJe,tW-, ........ ~~
H
$
FO l~e ~n
ll
r,,.11t Ln
•
" ..
:i
..
..
3~
..
.. ,
"' "
\.,
' ~ " " i
1:-.r...:1, fl,J
."11. 19
• 23
•
o..,.~.,, "&•-·1tr1:..,,
("<,
,.,·,~,
t -,~
I
,,.,,, ---
I
aTYOFANDeRIION
LOCAL ~o,\11 lAFETY PLAN
Legend
Interactive Map I Comments
Biking
l • Commenl
\ • Driving
\. Commenl
Pedestrian • Commenl
• Transil Commenl
Priority
Intersection
Callrans
'\ IZZA Jurisdielion
" .i tm!] City Jurisdic:tion
~ Priority Segment
Callrans
• Jurisdiction
• City Jurisdi(:lion
µ City Boundary
" ' -
"' .... o\,
~
'I'..,
...
,:
" !
<:
iii·
..
,¢
.. ~ ,~
"1,-0,,
"',,
1>.,.
(,, ~-'•
..

F'lqoctNo. 11U5115
-No.

INTERACTIVE MAP COMMENTS

FROM ANDERSON LRSP

PUBLIC WEBSITE
Dobt 1M1112021
FIGURE1 ,.._,.._..._.,..._ ....... ..,..__,.. ....... J.tNlffll,e,--.i....,-#CM.ata~ .... ,..~~-1-• Cl'_,....,1•-•lll•C.. .... ~ ......... ,--.. N-~°'9-l'l•IIIIN lnterac:uv. Map com.manta
I CIC'.lt,11 C 1 l,pr , ,,. • 11111111-1111 1 7/28/2021 ,.,.. = .. 2 712&/20211U11 C=nl Would tb I four Wl"f ttop hire. tf9' traffic from lhis Mighbortlood and ui, walling _. .. ........,.. _ . to$Chools, many times !\.<rt hrtd ctot.c:tlswtt'I ~pit~ outof~or 2 O 40-153783 -122.20754"1 - ~ --- ..,.wuw.oww..ws,1 lhil IUWHbOP •• rec:orded klltflt~ SuggHUOns"" Ntt.Oftf)""CltoctOSta•111:nea9ftraffic oaicait ~ tabait ln.tMLoetlRoadSafMyPla• 59Nd~ "a ,-..mue dO'MI Pinon. De'1, we see cet1 OO!ft9MJover tl"le 25 n1)h 111N: Seary ,inoe lt4rw ue a lot of yowig ctiid,- play-.g in thi& nelghbomood Would ~ to '" ~ 'P"d bumps put iQ
W• nffd & Nlety offlcet 81"91ned here duMg ltlrl of Khoo! and etN:I of ktlOOI My 3 7'2*"202113_()0 Dnv'ng !Cklthftl-.eported11mOttbeWl,ghi'lbycarw1ncU w utatbcomupatkinglol Commlrll WI~ Ira"". It .. ,,,.. '1(1- tHI U\ln 3mli or dnwtl n1~1t1-Un int.nechon C:Cf'redfy. E.thef a Afaty offl~r o, • nffw;: light..

Pedntnln W• nNd • aoning ~nsl Mre Ona Yfhtre Pffntrilns CP pnh to CtOH and 4 7QVl021 13 09 Canml:n1 ftt:st'llftf jig ht,. t!iert CltNWI. Kidt UM tr,ia "1MI Wlllk to N«tl the ~tfH shop Ind gas 1.tatmn nrlHT\atC!J and dJiYII" r..-eity stop ~ ~re PedNtnln We need I pec,ernn erotli'lg 11gne1 hHe. One IM'lwe p,edtlfnlM can push and 5 7n8/202.113-15 Ccinmant ftatmgtighbc;:analltf'ldl"Nall T~Q11Ttnt1"15ttmf;OnfUwldrtvtrsortt'lejgl'\Ofe l*lfttNnt~to.t<:U117/t1fw'om theNottri 1.::le
For people ~ want IO ~ Pl~ ror pal\iing andlor 11'1'1'19 to wa*- to IIMI Falt~ enter.nee ti.In into lraffM: danger tr;,, lac;:k of a p,oper ..... :k and lad!. of~ Mllrk<td pecltttriM CI0&1'"8•· Oumg higb t,af'f,c tirre&. auc:h aa Andarson explodn. pedHtnaM end up MIYinQ thfaqJgh traffic " Iha dark, unprotaaed ancl ungUICMd by pro~r .......,.,u: o, erotlftgt
1 1
Qat20'2t 10_
18 Cnwlg Oriwrt Nn the ,top ~n ltth•ootMrofSttady Ln ~ Bait Ftny Rd ,a, iooo-.a ~tit This II lo hont o1 Jr.lNCIM lMM-Mid It Mppent at 1 11 houri. 8 7/28J202117:44 =~ e.&rloidawtibfar .... 111:lngandbiblgtgpart.; ii 7/l8l'lf12117.40 ';;'= Contnua~ol1ielewlfll.toinfrontof116octltopsatbly1t 10 7/2&'20211748 =M TOOmln)'peoplan1nthisstap19'Lalhaun.otlhadlly Df'rt1nt ~ 1K41 .. and dOMI Mlrthl St Ewen Mil UM e,44,taon oft~ stop 19' a fwt 11 7l2&'202120-"49 Commtm ,e1tsbaekt11eyallltt.tftythroughlll:o,u.._it1ope.-01Asnd'"howrntU.,1;:.1n go.
~ IUmif19 1, .... ereaw a hazan»u, bl!M ,poe Yfflen bol?I turning IIIMI are 12 7/2&/202123.1& = .. ==-... --doftOO"'" Atot of P90ple ire turning '-ft out of the 1panmanm ~ litft 1um1 are Pft)h!Oltitd 13 712IV2021232,4 DJiYlf'IO The Pinon and B1meytjgtlt h.uon.q,el• ~ YM"ld~ VefflctuminQ. ttwouSo M -c:omrn.nt 5lrtatd1t1,tigl'lt.t\Mtwo~lof .. ctllideof~f'Nd 14 7'2912t121 1e:4o Dflfl'l9 A 4 way &top lign would be apprecia1ed Mra, rraming U'lffic: on Nonh St it~ Carnrntnt too fut~ enough brtakt-YI lrlffle lo be 1tN to entet ulely from Olk: st 15 IVZJ202112:0'2 = Clo11W1ll.1T11rkq1nd11gntwhtfew1~patllcrosanO.k6t The 6-GUIYN on 8alll Fmy Road need • IMOitr plYtd thCIUldet In Of'dtr to pro-Ml t,urr.,- -~betwNn ~-a~; bcydilt1 &rid vtMdft. n,,.,oute rn.ict.be l'll'AQltitd by thoH who rHlde lr"I 1he COUNy tautl"I bf And.BOn Rlwf Pn blJ wat11 to ndathff t,q,c:tutotM park Th• leek ofa paved tMul<Mrthat is sale•• Nlffllnt to u11ng blc)'C* lo get ID Md from thl pani. l would •Ito aid in gMng whims NtCm'ef)' &?'ca th-1 dril'I O\l'ltl the ETW - '"ro~ aceident p,t,oto&.a2021

40.4-40533 -122 297498 ::..""::::-::, TM 1ugge1t,on II r.cotded ~n tne •Public SuggntJClnt" -.~ tat.It 1n 1ha local Road s.r.cy Plen
Thi imffleCtion of NoM SV.., Ind Ent SI.rut is
KSfn:ifled &1 I pf'lody 1ocabot1 -, u,, Locel R.OIG Sar.ty 40452051 -12'229MW '*'"'*_. == P141n.enOappbbi9~~be DtO#ft/ ~1 ~ad-In add;Cif;l,n, thl1 •I.IWflbon !1 recorded in the -Pubic S~"' llbh in tM Lotll Road
.S.fety Plln
4C"1S312r ·122.29781&'*'-."°'* == Thq•uggntionit~inthe"PubllcSU99nbonl .. MICWIII ~ 1a.bllinNL.ocalRoadSalel'f~A.

Tht finlefHdion o1 Norin Slreet and RevtrMOOCI Lana
--~ II liHNifil<I 11 • poonty~,., ttie Local Road
,c ~3 •122 295708 Nlp.l!MfM:iao ..._...._._ ... ., .. S.tety Plan, and applicabla ~tul"ff will bl .a,-, ~ r~.lnldd.t"loft,Uvl&vg9MbOl'l .. nrcordffl In Ill "Pubic Suggnt>on1"' tabre in a» Local ROid
S.tft)'Pl:sn
4045-1959 •172287587--il-,---=~ TlQ11,199"tioniJ(9C06'dedlllthe ·Puf*Suggfftlon .... It Oll'lltl' ~ tabla 1n Uta local Road $a1-y Pi.in •c.401107 -122 268678 ,_ . ...__... ~;.. TMt lugge,&t!Cln lt teCOfded ~the~ SIJOOHliClns- '*- ~ tltMlnlNL~IRoadS.fetyPIIA .C045952e -122281212 '-.-.-... = Thb1ouggNtionit~1t1the"P1.1blc8ugg.-.bon1" Dk.CIIIM ~,a tab6tJnlhel.ocalRoadSaf.-yP1an '0'60095 .172287821 !IIP:lflll_..,. == ThisSuOf*ll:iol'litteCOfdeditlltla'"Publc:SuvgattJoniJ'" OKWII- ~ 15 t.atNtn1MLOC*RoedSat«yP11n

40.-150744 .1722955n•.hl1aolbo =--==-TM~ugg,ntionittKOrdaditlthe"'PubllcSvflHtJOn~ Ok...,_ ~ t&bll-1nthe~Roed8afety:Plln.

Thw inlalMdlon o1 SA 273 and Marx W•)' tS .tent.iflad
40 .. oo1S ·122fflffl::._. ~= =~~=rm:=!o:=~it::=. - ... .._.... • .-od .. the"Pubk-- W>lit ~n the Local Road Slt.ty Plan
"10.4385M -12229127Q •-._. ::"!:= Thi,~uggntiont1~in1he"Putllic:5'tsm"tion1"' Dk.-.1 ~ tab'-u,theLoc:alRoaclSafatyPllln. "10.453193 -122297531 MIIRM .... =:.:= Thi•"UZl"tioniirewrdediot,1,-·P\Cllic:sug;es\lolW -Nffllll' ~ t.1tMant1wtLoal.R06dSareryP11n. 40-11567~ -122300831 ~ ,....,._.,_ =~ Thisauegnmn1,rewrd41dmU.·~Suggnbont" ~ 1 t.1tMtn1i..Loca,.RoadS1r.etyP.lln 40452407
TM ........ ntof a. .. FanyR011d bahwten Bah Feny
Road al'ld Ohey W•t it~ as e pnonty toc.1'0A
-122 278545 _.hWd\.J :-c::= 11n the Local ROid Salety Pwl, and 1pplclbll ,,-.-,1 ~~• ,:.ourii.rffl91Ml"fl.Vfll b(9 ,epplltcl. In HCJC,ign, 1'111 sLJ0091,CICln IS Nlml"dad 111 tht, ·Pu:blie Suggestion,;- l,ebla In the Loe.i Rood S.i.ty Pion
17 8123'202\ Ci.33
18 IJ123f202l $34
IU l/23r202J 0:37
20 8123/2021 i·311
21 112:vlOl:1 t 4 t
22 812312021 S."12
23 &l'lll202\ G-13
24 8123/2021 ~ ..
2S &12'31202:11>"15
2e 8(1"1'202\ 12:34
27 911Ul02t 12.38
28 Glt4/2021 12.40
29 il14'2021 12:43
30 9/14r.20'29 1?·4S
31 9114(202) 12.S4
B1ktft1I ~ .. ,,. tndl. AM lf'lll'l'OWI on 1oacK tnd IIQl\1, i.1inq OftWf5 lhtt btkn IT'aJ' UR Co,nment 11.11 llnt.
eou.s Common!
OIMftf
Comment
8d<u>i Convntnt
Dnwlt
cDIM09
Cotnmtnt
Dnw,g
c ........ ,
Bolun',I Cornmtnt
r .....

ConvntM
B>king
Com<.....i
Bdting
Canmo,,t
Peclttttllfl
Comment
PffHtnln
Camnwn!
--
Comment
SMn'cPM In pal1un9 IIDC ainoe bil:ers and walkers -w.l be using •pace lD get t4, tratl.

Tra~ t1fflln9 mttawe, Clrl drM!P too '811 11 the-.pant. $tta111'9'M on JON{lthortt.rm). UM tlltf'l iPie. lO ereatt p~ blQ Lane {longtrterm
TrafflCcaffll'lgffle"t1ure. Ca5 dme loo fa.C 1r1 park
lraflk: cenw.g measu111 C.. Cltw IOD fMC ~ park
Trark: cam.lg mtaMM CIA dt'Ht 100 fa1' in ,ark.
hr~ on road iahort ,em,l Ula •.drll -,.ee to er.at. ~ bit• ilfAtl llonQ !Mnl
wa.Jld love to ... fN,quant. lillable tllt'IMI berwMn Cononwooc, 11'1d Sbu1a Lib C<y but 0< rail IO!lWday.

S.pwatt t,ike ladcy •IMO 273 would DI> l'lt:pful ll'ld Mt« thM blknlpeda ahafing Nf'otowithlw9'! 1pNd, nail'/~. FtcNy~n'IM'4lobetl t'°"G273 MM NIS ~ '-roul.iflSI bi~ too in.,c:t, t.'lah ~ t¥ptntnc.Hft anc:1 .... nt
lrAaka a good t/w conn«tOr cFeny o, 1 Ollftlo of roads wthou1 betng too ~for~d11b)logttftornsdloal10.Al)cMraonRM,Par1t_or'fte
cthar '6de of AndarJon Ttu,; r;r;Mlld be huge topogQhy " tie\ -,id J1' super 11ft • fl.ts. N s>OttMill fof manr ~NS to uM lot Mvt:t'li tchoob {Andlnon New T~ And M.iddle, AnNrs.on H.gh, poCtfflilllty AAdffl.on Height& w101 a attou, fDIAII ~ts.idem U• Uul pettii I ho,- II 1taW1 • Good etee11o for otdalbikH 10 9at to Ula p,tl'k..,... if• «*I ls dat.-!lto;o ttuQ1191,. PnQdiff ~" to~ intot-. -'9f'IDOthood and IO M ,,.di. Hlw IOtl of ama• trailt '"1m back.a of propeni:es lhat are open Incl acces.aiblt to fMfflnQ pert. CINn up thit 1Cl1ef"lt<:tion for IM(IIIWt,t 1torriM ..tt'I curo eutt, 1d"'9 1nol)tf COfltntflttl CfOM1ftO. squa.-..g ll'tll4MCban Ml wmin9 IT'IOYell'4itlCI ... ltopPR'llowld
4'ricu!l 1rtt b' blQ1 1t\d PMS. Mort derined space n-.ded under 1-5 getting lo food and gram~ ,no~
OrlOt I tr6td IO WII~ from Stlrtlucll& loo M fflOVII thNll•r I had to go a lor,g waya out Q4' my v.,iy. Short ~ lhel .,. c::ooven•nc lttd Mft to, ~ are integral to • more waM.bil COn"Wl"IJ~ rm surt many pt,ds tl'lll l\aw to Cn)U 11'1 unqifa plllc;ft In my <:&HI fowld It inconYenllM to h .... IO wan; out DI) PIHtanl Hjll; Dr in Of(ltlt ti) tttlll,s ~l'IOl',da and 273.

40.451023 ·122.292181
40 48525 -122.275887
•o.- -122.27Nn
40 4eCl982 .,2:2 279787
•O 48$407 . ,22 273401
404828' ·12221a537
40 46297:J ·122.2705,H
Tho_.,molS-Flfl)<Road-Soo,a,S..et
to Toyon SttNt Iii id1~ as I pnonty locaCiOl'I in the =-=:.~ ~
l.oc:IIRoad SlfttyPSlln. and•plUble . . COU..lernwa19,1Jrfl'#9 ~ «PJlie(I. 111 10dtion, 1h• IUQONtiOn IS Nmtded ft tM .,.Public $u;gffborls9 le:bla ., the Local Roed &ltef'f Plan.

The H9'fllnl ol Baa. FM)' Road be1wHn South SUNt
=== Co Ta'/00 StsfflilJdMtlfied ti I P"°'1t'/ bcall0n .ntM l.OCIIRoaCISatttJPMn,andapplCablil ~ 1 cow.aerme•surn._. be•~- en addllian. this
s.uooes.tion cs rMlOf'ded in 1M ·Pu* 8uogHboftl· tat,,e _,O\t&.oe.l~OMSl'lflYPJII"
.._.~...,...... =---- This luggnbon i1 reco,dad III ttie•Pubfic Suggnb0n1'"' tllblelnth•UQIRoedS.retyPIIP.
--.~ Thit 1~ lttee:Ofdfd ll'l lbe•Publc 8uggq2,on_. :::::;::t·R· ltble•n dlt l.ocll RON Sa~ Pian. =-=--~ lhis s.uggnbon i11'9COfdtd III tn.·Publllc 8"ggt5bont~ ~t Ubi..o tti• Local ROH Sa,.., Plln.
,.~.,_....,. This 1ugvntmn ii l'8Cllfdad 1111t11·~ SUgg~, :::.:::t•.,_,. ••b .. lft dlt loc,I RMd SafMy Pitn. ::-.=:,.~
~
Th11 ~uogHt.On is ~dtd ~n tM·PuWt 8uggnbontt
tlblt,n Ehl Loctl RON Safety P11n.
,...,...,......,.
~
This tl,lljlgnbon 11 lffOldtd Ill tt.e ·Publie SuggeltlOII,, =- UltMU'lthelocelRoadSafetyPtan.
::'c!::...~
~
lh1~ IUplbon ·~ f900fdad ~ tfte .P\,bk Sul1G*lti0M· llb ... U'tf'IILOCIIFfoedS&fltyPlln. ,...,,,_ .. ._. ... ..,.....,. Ttllt ~ IS rKOfded tn ttie·Pubk SUoglt:IOIII• •
1 22 300418 ;;---• ~~~- • cabl&.., tilt local Rc..d Safety Plan ._....__. t.-·._.~ Thl1 '"i9"1*1 ii tiKOtdeO 14' U,•"Publle S1.1.P0fl1"' 40.457177 ,122.28421&.....,.."' =~.,.-- ca~U1itieLQC11IRoedSa""'PR11n.

Appendix B
Collision Data
GHD I City of Anderson I 11225875 I Local Road Safety Plan This document is in draft foll'n . The contents, induding any opinions. conclusions or recommendations contained in. or which may be implied from, this draft document must not be relied upon. GHD reserves the right, at any time. without notice, to modify or retract any part or all of the draft document. To the maximum extent permitted by law. GHD disclaims any responsibility or liability arising from or in connection with this draft document.

Collisions at Selected Intersections
I I· 1111111111111111 I OX Yoke Rd RMHsideA.ve L.oc.ol 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 RMlrsicllAw Alexander Ave Local 1 1 1 1 0
3 ~N11$1d1Ave EbbyLII L.oc.ol 2 2 2 0
4 Oownlng Ln Claudeln LOl)II 1 1 1 1 4 1 1
5 EaSI St PartOla way Local 1 1 1 1 0
' Ees16t Nonll St L.oc.ol 3 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1, 3 4
7 Easl st FenySI Locol 1 1 1 1 0 1
• E&SISI Sou1h St L.oc.ol 1 1 1 • 1 1
• Harth St Rave""°""Rd Locol 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 32 1
10 Harth St Dtiftsloneor Locol 1 1 8 1 1
11 NGMSI Northway SI L.oc.ol 1 1 1 1 0
u Ho<th SI Ventu'fl St Locol 1 2 1 2 3 a 1
1S NOflh SI 08k St L.oc.ol 2 1 1 2 0 2
14 NO<th St 6M1"St L.oc.ol 1 3 1 2 2 1 1 • 1 4
1t -St Churtll SI L.oc.ol 1 1 1 • 1
11 Ho<th St Vernon St Locol 1 1 1 0 1
17 F1lrgtounds01 2nd SI LOCII 1 1 1 1 0
1t FolrglOUll<lsOr 11tst Local 2 1 1 1 1 2 0
11 SIMltSt Diamond St Local 1 1 1
~ Sllvorst Hl)'I St LOCII 2 1 1 1 1 0
21 SIMfSI ShHII St Local 1 1 1 8 1 1
2l Slt..rSI Mil St L.oc.ol 1 2 1 , 1 1 1 1 23 3
Ji SilwrSI FenySI LOCII 1 2 3 2 1 13 1
24 Sll\/erSI Howard SI Lacat 1 1 1 1 0 1
25 WCIMlrSI Heys SI Local 1 1 1 1 0 1
21 WCtnlllrSI HowordSt LOl)II 1 1 1 1 0 1
Z7 WClnterSt S0uth 81 Locol 1 1 1 1 0 1
2t Bnoos St UI Stl Chun:11 St Local 1 1 1 1 0 1
2t South SI Emily Rd Locol 1 1 1 11 1 1
30 SOulll St Douglas SI L.oc.ol 1 1 1 1 0 1
31 S0u1h SI EC1ttte1S1 Locel 1 1 1 1 0 1
32 SOulll SI Freeman St Local , 1 1 1 0 1
n SOulll SI Qek SI Local 1 1 1 1 0
24 N0c1hS1 .... 11111$1 L....,I 2 1 1 1 2 12 2 2
u Fony St .... 1111. St l.Ocal 1 1 1 1 11 1 1
3' Bab FenyRd 08kSt L.oc.ol 1 2 1 2 2 1 13 1
n Bah FenyRd GetewoyOr LOCII 2 1 1 1 1 12 2 2
u 8&111 Ferry Rd Childnts.sDr Local 3 1 2 1 2 1 3 0
St Bab FenyRd Shadyln L.oc.ol 1 1 2 2 7 1
I
• I I -' , r! •~ '
40 BabFenyRd ~y Ln Is Balls Fany Rd I.Ooal
0 SllalsFonyRd Rid Budln Loool
42 Mannac:Rd RMIRldeDr l.ocal
cs _,St VYllowLn Local
44 SUngyLn MarmacRd Local
4a Stillgyln St 61opllens Dr local 1 ... Sllngyln Rupe~ Rd Local 1 ., StlngyLn SioQ Local ... 0-eDr Flagw,nect Local
41 Of1ftstoneor Gllnyon Dr Local
50 Pinon Aw Knobcone Ave l..DQI
61 PinonA,e Bruce Dr Loal
52 Pinon Aw Htn,lod<Aw Loal
n Pinon Aw urdlSI Local
M Pltlon Aw Spruce St Local
u PleHtnt Hlls Dr R,lgec, Local
H Pleasanl Hlls Dr Rllondl Rd Local 2 2 2
17 F1<1ory Ou1lols Dr M,ysWay Local
H Caad>ulHRd cornerw.., Local 2 41
II Lo<usl SI SBameyRd Local 2 2 2 0 2
.. SR273 Spring Gulch Rd 273 1 1 12 1 2
11 SR273 OxYOke Rd 273 3 2 2 4 2 3 47 I 7
12 SR273 1119cJ<entldgoLn 278 1 I 1 1
u SR273 3"'81/Ale>clnderAve 273 2 z 2 42 3 3
14 SR273 IIIW• 81 273 2 3 1 2 1 21 3 4
H SR273 NOllh St 273 I I 4 I 3 47 • 12
.. SR273 SOUU,St 273 7 3 2 2 2 3 2 48 2
17 BR273 BtuceCr 273 3 3 3 3 2 3 2 .. 4 ' 7
.. SR273 Man<Wty 273 5 3 2 61 5 I .. SR273 Pillon Ave I Barney Rd 273 1 1 31 2 2 70 SR273 Fa®fy Oa1ll1S Cr 273 5 e 6 3 3 5 2 47 I 12
71 SR273 Pleu&ntHllsDr 273 5 2 4 3 2 1 1 43 • • Ji RrAIMHIAve 1·5NBR<lml)S 5 3 2 2 33 1 4 7S Nonh SI l-5SBOIIRsmp 5 3 4 4 25 2 • 14 Nortll 81 ~5NBOnRamp 5 2 1 1 2 0 2 16 -•nyOr Gll~Cr Local 1 2 2 2 13 1 3
11 e.1sFenyRd ~5 NB On Ramp I Mc:Muny Dr 5 2 4 4 2 3 32 3 7 n Factory Outlets Dr ~5 S8 OIi Ramp 5 2 31 2 2 11 FadoryO<Jtfels Dr /Oesdlulff Rd ~5 NB Ramps/ Loc<,11 81 5 4 2 2 2 1 21 2 I 71 Manter Dr Alimo Rd Local 1 1 1 0 1 Total 1 13 3,4 44 104 16 27 52 1 7 8 42 27 32 002A _,Ave Local 13 1
G03A FaJ-ndsOr 3n1S1to 111St Local 1 0
GOeA 111St Westof Peul Orl0Brigg1St Local 0
to6A BriwtSl Chun:11 SI lo W Cent« St Local 11 1
oou Fe,,y St
- HSlo WC.ntM St Local 22 2
GOtA -rdSI W.storw.stSI to WC.Iller SI Local 0
OOtB HoW11rdSt E C.nter St to &st ol Oak St Local 0 - Hays St Slvet 51 to SR 273 Local 0 009A 5c:l1ool St Franklin St 10 W.., SI LOCI! 11
010A Olinda Rd City Boundauy lo Enil)< Rd Local 2 2 2 2 3 54 4 • 0108 Sooth St En-ii'/ Rd to Sj,camora Ln LOCI! 1 7 1 2 011A l\lillSI e .. t St to &st ol O.k St Local 1 0
012A NollhSI Nollh End la Ventura St Local 1 1 2 11 2
01SA S1illgy Ln BelMOOd Ln 10 Nortll SI local 1 0
0138 Sli"llY Ln Nollh St to Bolls For,y Rd local 2 2 13 1 01SC S Batis Fer,y Rd Bds For,y Rd to Davey W3'( Local 1 2 37 2 014A 811111 Fefl)'Rd Soutll St to Toyon St local 1 3
015A McMufl)'Or N<w1II St to BaUI Fer;y Rd Local 2
01,11 Rupert Rd Stingy Ln to Perl< Pl Local 3 3
017A Dodlon Ln Park Pl IO s Bello Ferry Rd loc:at 1 2
011A 8-liaSI Ra-Rdk>Tmborln local
018A GnwayOr Bab Fell)' Rd to Sooth of Sa~lre ln local
020A MarmacRd Slin11, Ln to Rivetsida Or Local
021A Bruce Or Pinon Ave to Barney Rd Local
022A Pinon Ave l<nol>cono ,.veto Spruce St local
0228 Pinon,..,. Spruco S1 IO SR 273 local 1
023A Lodgepolt,. .. Knoboont Ave 1o Pinon Ave locet 1
024A Kno_,..,. Pinon Ave to East or Hen*>ckAve local 3 2 OHA He-Ave Pinon,..,. to Knobcone Ave Local 1
021A SptucaSI Pinon Ave to Sptuca Cir local 11 1
027A EHllllicleOr 9,uce Or ta ParitoltO or Local 1 D
021A MancW., SR 273 to Berney Rd local 0
029A Berney Rd E1stof Bnlce Orto SR 273 local 0
02tB SBemoyRd l..aoJst Rd to lndullry Rd Local 0
030A Nf>/Wly Nollh End to SOut, End Local 1 1 I
031A Rhonda Rd Pleasent Hills Rd to South of PIHsent Hill Rd Local 2 2 2 2 2 2 44 3 OSZA locust St De1Chuta1 Rd to Ci1y Boundary Local 1 17 2 2 033A SR273 Ci1y llounclary to H1pa SI 273 2 3 3 2 2 2 161 3 • Sl'Wl'I ly
I
Bounrliry
Total
Appendix C
Field Reconnaissance
GHD I City of Anderson 111225875 I Local Road Safety Plan This document is in draft fonn. The contents, including any opinions, conclusions or recommendations contained n. or which may be implied from, this draft document must not be relied upon. GHD reserves the right, al any time, without notice, lo modify or retract any part or all of the draft document. To the maximum extent permitted by law, GHO disclaims any responsibility or liability arising from or in connection with this draft document. i!Il1 5 d
Field Visit Notes I Anderson LRSP
Date: December 3. 2021 at midday
General Notes: The City hopes to promote East Center Street as Anderson's downtown. Anderson River Park is used for many City events. Very few bicyclists and pedestrians were observed. Many of the pedestrian and bicycle facilities were discontinuous. SR 273 runs through the middle of Anderson and complicates connectivity between the northeast and southwest portions of the City. Along this corridor, speeds along seem high and all signalized intersedions have retroreflective borders.

T111Jle 1 Notes from Visired Prlorily lntetsactlons
I Stingy Ln / Balls Ferry Rd Add intersection lighting (NS.I.) 2 Severe nJury Co4llsions
AJI-Wey Stop Control (3 Leg)
Pleasant Hills Dr I Rhonda
Rd
1 Severe nJury C0Uis1on
1 Bicycle Collision
Signal (3 Leg)
Top Type: Rear End
Top Violation: Unsafe Speed
North St I Ravenwood Ln
Install raised median on approaches (NS. I.)
lnstal'1upgrade pedestrian crossing al uncontrol ad
locations (with enhanced safety features)
lnC(ease DUI enforcement at night
Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with
retroreflective borders, mounting, size. and number
lnstal raised pavement markers and striping (Through
Intersection)
1nsta11 · s1GNAL AHEAD" signs (W3-3) on approaches to
intersection
Move back stop bar on Rhonda Rd to be in line with J
existing median
Improve pavement striping
1 Severe niury CoUtsion
Install/upgrade larger or additional stop signs or other intersection warning/regulatory signs
----'l·_u_pg_ rade lnte~~n pavement mark1ngs (NS.I.}
Many vehicles roll past the stop on the northbound right tum lane • May be beneficial to install e bulb out at the northeast comer to shorten the pedestrian crossing distance end reduce rolling stops • No bike lane on north side of Stingy Lene (potential to restripe this leg to install a bike lane)
Connects the elementary school to the trail to Anderson River Park City representative has not seen any crossing guards at th,s mtsrsection
Southbound left tum lane on Pleasant Hills Drive comes suddenly and &tart& on a curve (not much decision time}
May have too low of volumes on Ravenwood to justify AWSC at this location
H gh visibility crosswalks would be beneficial
11225875 I Field Visit Notes
1 Public Comment
Two-way Stop Control (4 Leg)
North St / East St
1 Pedestrian Collision
1 Public Comment
/'JI-Way Stop Control (4 Leg)
Top Type: Broadside
Top Violation. Auto Right of way
SR 273 / Bruce St
1 Severe lnJury Collision
1 Pedestrian Collision
Signal (4 Leg)
Top Types: Rear End/Broadside
Top Violations: Unsafe Speed!Traffic
Signals & Signs
SR 273 / Marx Way
1 Pedestrian Collision
1 Public Comment
Two-way Stop Control (4 Lsr,)
Top Type: Broadside
Top Violation: Auto Right of Way
SR 273 / Pleasant Hills Dr
S:-gnal (4 Leg)
r op Type: Rear End
Top Violation: Unsafe Speed
Install/upgrade pedestrlan cross,ng at uncontrolled
locations (with enhanced safety features) ' Install "CROSS TRAFFIC DOES NOT STOP" supplementary warning plaque (W4-'4P) below stop sign
Evaluate installing signals"
OR
Convert intersection to roundabout (from all way stop)
OR
Install/upgrade larger or additional stop signs or other intersection warning/regulatory signs
Install raised median on approaches (NS.I.)
Upgrade intersection pavement markings (NS.I )
tnstalt/upgrade pedestrian crossing at uncontrolled
locations (with enhanced safety features)
Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with
~ trorenective borders. mounting, size, and number
tmprove signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation)
Install raised pavement markers and striping (Through
tntersection)
Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian lnterval (LPI)
Evaluate installing signals"
OR
lnstallfupgrade larger or additional stop signs or other Intersection warning/regulatory signs
Create directional median openings to allow (and restrict) left-turns and u- turns (NS.I.) OR Install acceleration lane for westbound left-turning vehicles
Install acceleration lane for westbound left-turning
vehides
Install/upgrade pedestrian crossing at uncontrolled
locations (wilh enhanced safety features)
Improve signal hardware: tenses, back-plates wilh
fetroreflective borders, mounting, size. and number
Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow. or operation)
Add countermeasure to reduce the number of uncontrolled crosswalk& (might be best to keep the one ciosar to 7-Eleven and remove the one on the south leg)
North Street approaches and departures do not line up
Mey be beneficial to reduce lhe number of approaeh lanes High school on one comer
Consider installing curb to guide pedestrians and create a barrier between vehides and pedestrians
Part of the pedesttian facilities are at grade
• Speeds seem too high to install crosswalk
• Nearest crosswalks not in dose proximity the intersection • Consider recommending a HAWK et this location
• First intersection for veh1des departing 1-5
• 2 red lenses on each signal head
--·------------------------ --- -
11225875 I Field Visit Notes 2
Table 2 Not.a from Visited Priority Segments
Scgmen· R 8COnl rn-2 n ced Notes
COl1'1tc:rrncasurcs
Rhonda Rd (Pleasant Hills Install curve advanoe warning • Curvature near driveways to shopping center Rd to South of Pleasant Hills signs
Rd) Install dynamic/variable speed
1 Severe lniurv CoHos,on warning signs
Top Typ&: Broadside/HK Object
Top Violation: Auto Right of way
I
Balls Ferry Rd (South Stto Install clear signage near . Fleshing beacon near school with no a>rresponding sign Toyon St) elementary school to guide
vehides during school drop
1 Severe ln1urv Collision off/pick up
2 Public Comments Widen bike lanes
Partner with school for Safe
Routes to School Project
SR 273 (South St to Pleasant Add aegment I ghting • Median fencing on the bridge Hills Dr) Remove or relocate fixed objects • Pedestrian facilities are inconsistent and disa>ntinuous (some areas require walking on 2 Fatal Colisions outside of Clear Rea>very Zone the ahoulder of the roadway to get from one area to another) 3 Severe Ln1ury Co11!S10f1S Install edgeline rumble • Al the time, there were several people gathering under and around the bridge 4 Pedestrian Collisions strips/stripes • Sidewalk on bridge was narrow - I
Top Type: Vehicle-Pedestrian Install pedestrian median fencing I Top Violation; Pedestrian Violation on approaches Install sidewalk/pathway (to avoid
I walking along roadway)
Install/upgrade pedestrian
I crossing (with enhanced safety
features)
11225875 I Field Visit Notes 3
Stingy Lane/ Balls Ferry Road
• Many vehicles roll past the slop on the northbound right tum lane • May be beneficial to install a bulb out at the northeast comer to shorten the pedestrian crossing distance and reduce rolling stops • No bike lane on north side of Stingy Lane (potential to restripe this leg to install a bike lane) • Connects the elementary school to the trail to Anderson River Park • City representative has not seen any crossing guards at this intersection 11225675 I Field Visit Notes o4
North Street/ Ravenwood Lane
• May have too low of volumes on Ravenwood lo justify AWSC at this location • High visibility crosswalks would be beneficial
• Add countermeasure lo reduce the number of uncontrolled crosswalks (might be best to keep the one doser to 7-Elewn and remove the one on the south leg)
11225875 I Field Visit Notes s
North Street/ East Street
• North Street approaches and departures do not line up • May be beneficial to reduce the number of approach lanes • High school on one comer
11225875 I Field Visit Notes 6
SR 273 / Bruce Street
• Consider installing curb to guide pedestrians and create a barrier between vehicles and pedestrians • Part of the pedestrian facilities are at grade
11225875 I Field Visit Notes 7
SR 273 (South Street to Pleasant Hills Drive}
• Median fencing on the bridge
• Pedestrian facilities are inconsistent and discontinuous (some areas require walking on the shoulder of the roadway to get from one area lo another) • At the time, there were several people gathering under and around the bridge • Sidewalk on bridge was narrow
11225675 I Field VLSit Notes 9
SR 273 / Marx Way
Speeds seem too high to install crosswalk
Nearest crosswalks not in dose proximity the intersection Consider recommending a HAWK at this location
11225875 I Field Visit Notes 8

AGENDA ITEM
ianuary 18, 2022, City Council Meeting!
Approved for Submittal By:

To Be Presented By:

To:

Peter Wickenheiser, Deputy Public Works Director
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Anderson City Council Through:

From:

Date:
!SUBJECT
Jeff Kiser, City Manager
Peter Wickenheiser, Deputy Public Works Director
January 18, 2022
Approve a Professional Services Agreement with PACE Engineering to update the City's Urban Water Management Plan.
!RECOMMENDATION
The Deputy Public Works Director recommends that the City Council:

Authorize the City Manager to execute a Professional Service Agreement with PACE Engineering to update the City's Urban Water Management Plan.

I FISCAL IMPACT
The contract is not to exceed $30,000 without written approval from the City.

ITEM 8.9b PAGE1 1/18/2022
I DISCUSSION and BACKGROUND
In 1983 the California Legislature approved Assembly Bill 797, Division 6, Part 2.6, and Sections 10610 - 10656 of the California Water Code. This legislation, the Urban Water Management Planning Act, requires urban water suppliers providing water for municipal purposes to more than 3,000 service connections or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet (AF) of water annually to prepare and adopt an Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) every five years.

The purpose of the UWMP is to maintain efficient use of urban water supplies, continue to promote conservation programs and policies, ensure that sufficient water supplies are available for future beneficial use and provide a mechanism for response during water drought conditions.

The City's last UWMP was prepared in 2015, and the 2020 UWMP was due July 1, 2021. According to the July 29, 2021 letter received by the City from the Department of Water Resources (DWR), non-compliant water agencies are reported to the Legislature. !ATTACHMENT

1. Professional Services Agreement and Exhibits.

ITEM 8.9b PAGE2 1/18/2022

CITY OF ANDERSON

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH
WITH PACE ENGINEERING, INC.

FOR

UPDATE THE CITY'S URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
THIS AGREEMENT ("Agreement"), made and entered into this __ th day of ___ _, 2020, is by and between the City of Anderson, a California municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City," and PACE Engineering, Inc., hereinafter referred to as "Consultant." \VITNESSETH:

SECTION 1- ORGANIZATION AND CONTENTS.

This Agreement is divided into the following Sections:

Section/Title Page No.

SECTION 1 - ORGANIZATION AND CONTENTS 1
SECTION 2 - DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT 2
SECTION 3 - SCOPE OF SERVICES - BASIC; COMPLETION SCHEDULE 2 SECTION 4 - SCOPE OF SERVICES - ADDITIONAL; COMPLETION SCHEDULE 2 SECTION 5-COMPENSATION 2
SECTION 6 - RESPONSIBILITY OF CONSULT ANT 3
SECTION 7 - RESPONSIBILITY OF Cl'IY 3
SECTION 8 - INDEMNIFICATION 4
SECTION 9 A INSURANCE 4
SECTION 10 - GENERAL PROVISIONS 4

10.1 - Access to Records 4

10.2 - Assignment 4

10.3 - Changes to Scope of Work - Basic Services 4

10.4 - Compliance with Laws, Rule, Regulations 5

10.5 - Conflict of Interes.t 5

10.6 - Exhibits Incorporated 5

10.7 - Independent Contractor 5

10.8 - Integration; Amendment 5

10.9 -Jurisdiction 5

10.10 - Notice to Proceed; Progress; Completion 6

10.11 - Ownership of Documents 6

10.12 - Subcontracts 6

10.13 - Term; Termination 6

10.14 - Notice 7
SECTION 11 - SPECIAL PROVISIONS 7
Professional Services Agreement:

Update to Urban Water Management Plan I
SECTION 2 - DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
City desires to undertake that certain project, hereinafter referred to as "project," described in EXHIBIT "N' entitled "DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT" and to engage Consultant to provide the required professional services relating to it.

SECTION 3 - SCOPE OF SERVICES - BASIC; COMPLETION SCHEDULE Consultant shall perform those basic services in connection with the project as are set forth more particularly in EXHIBIT "B" entitled "SCOPE OF CONSULTANT SERVICES - BASIC; COMPLETION SCHEDULE" and shall complete said services in accordance with the completion schedule for them incorporated in said Exhibit.

SECTION 4- SCOPE OF SERVICES - ADDITIONAL; COMPLETION SCHEDULE It is understood by City and Consultant that it may be necessary, in connection with the project, for Consultant to perform or secure the performance of services other than those set forth in EXHIBIT "B.'' In each such instance, Consultant shall advise City, in advance and in writing, of the need for such additional services, their cost and the estimated time required to perform them (if appropriate). Consultant shall not proceed to perform any such required additional service until City has determined that such service is beyond the scope of the basic services to be provided, is required, and City has given its written authorization to perform or obtain it. Each additional service so authorized shall constitute an amendment to this Agreement, shall be identified and sequentially numbered as "Additional Consultant Service No. 1" and so forth, shall be subject to all of the provisions of this Agreement, and shall be attached to EXHIBIT "C" entitled "SCOPE OF CONSULTANT SERVICES - ADDITIONAL; COMPLETION SCHEDULE." SECTIONS - COMPENSATION; PAYMENT OF FEES
Consultant shall be compensated for services rendered to City pursuant to this Agreement in the amounts, manner and in accordance with the payment schedule as set forth in EXHIBIT "D" entitled "COMPENSATION." Amounts due to Consultant from City for services rendered shall be evidenced by the submission to City by Consultant of an invoice, prepared in a form satisfactory to City, setting forth the amount of compensation due for the period covered by it. Each such invoice shall be forwarded to City so as to reach it on the 1st day of the month, or other applicable period, for which the services invoiced were provided.

All such invoices shall be in full accord with any and all applicable provisions of this Agreement. City will review each such invoice and retain them in accordance with EXHIBIT "D," provided however that if Consultant Professional Services Agreement:

Update to Urban Water Management Plan 2
submits an invoice which is incorrect, incomplete, or not in accord with the provisions of this Agreement, then City shall not be obligated to process any payment to Consultant until a correct and complying invoice has been submitted.

SECTION 6 - RESPONSIBILITY OF CONSULTANT
By executing this Agreement, Consultant warrants to City that Consultant possesses, or will arrange to secure from others, all of the necessary professional capabilities, experience, resources and facilities necessary to provide to City the services contemplated under this Agreement. Consultant further warrants that Consultant will follow the best current, generally accepted professional practices to make findings, render opinions, prepare factual presentations, and provide professional advice and recommendations regarding the project for which services are rendered under this Agreement. It is expressly understood by all parties to this Agreement that Consultant makes no guarantee or warranty whatsoever to the success of this project.

SECTION 7 - RESPONSIBILITY OF CITY
To the extent appropriate to the project contemplated by this Agreement, City shall:

7.1 Assist Consultant by placing at Consultant's disposal all available information pertinent to the project, including previous reports and any other data relative to design and construction which may be applicable to it.

7.2 Guarantee access to and make all provisions for Consultant to enter upon public and private property as required for Consultant to perform Consultant services.

7.3 Examine all studies, reports, sketches, drawings, specifications, proposals and other documents prepared and presented by Consultant, and render verbally or in writing as may be appropriate, decisions pertaining thereto, within a reasonable time so as not to delay the progress of the work by Consultant.

7.4 Designate in writing a person to act as City's representative with respect to the work to be performed under this Agreement. Such person shall have complete authority to transmit instructions, receive information, interpret and define City's policies and decisions with respect to materials, equipment, elements and systems pertinent to Consultant's services.

LS Give prompt written notice to Consultant whenever City observes or otherwise becomes aware of an}' defect in the project.

7.6 Furnish approvals and permits from all governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the project and such approvals and consents from others as may be necessary for completion of the project.

SECTION 8 - INDEMNIFICATION
Professional Services Agreement:

Update to Urban Water Management Plan 3
Consultant shall hold City, its officers, boards and commissions, and members thereof, its employees and agents harmless of and free from any and all liability arising out of or relating to any negligent act or omission of Consultant or Consultant's employees or agents in rendering the services required by this Agreement and shall protect, defend, and indemnify them against such liability and the legal fees and costs incurred by the City in connection therewith.

SECTION 9 - INSURANCE
Any requirements by City that Consultant carry general liability, errors and omissions, or any other type of insurance in connection with the work to be performed and/or services to be rendered by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement shall be as set forth in EXHIBIT "E,t' entitled SPECIAL PROVISIONS.

SECTION 10 - GENERAL PROVISIONS

10.1 Access to Records
Consultant shall maintain all books, records, documents, accounting ledgers, and similar materials relating to work performed for City under this Agreement on file for at least (1) year following the date of fina1 payment to Consultant by City. Any duly authorized representative(s) of City shall have access to such records for the purpose of inspection, audit and copying at reasonable times, during Consultant's usual and customary business hours. Consultant shall provide proper facilities to City's reprcsentative(s) for access and inspection.

Consultant shall be entitled to reasonable compensation for time and expenses related to such access and inspection activities, which shall be considered to be an additional service to City, falling under the provisions of SECTION 4 hereinabove.

10.2 Assignment
This Agreement is binding to heirs, successors, and assigns of the parties hereto and shall not be assigned by either City or Consultant without the prior written consent of the other.

10.3 Changes to Scope of Work - Basic Services
City may at any time l'lnd, upon a minimum of ten (10) days' written notice, modify the scope of basic services to be provided under this Agreement. Consultant shall, upon receipt of said notice, determine the impact on both time and compensation of such change in scope and notify City in writing. Upon agreement between City and Consultant as to the extent of said impacts to time and compensation, an amendment to this Agreement shall be prepared describing such changes. Execution of the amendment by City and Consultant shall constitute the Consultant's notice to proceed with the changed scope.

10.4 Compliance with Laws, Rules, Regulations
Professional Services Agreement:

Update to Urban Water Management Plan 4
All services performed by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement shall be performed in accordance and full compliance with all applicable Federal, State or City statues, and any rules or regulations promulgated thereunder.

10.5 Conflict oflnterest
If City's City Manager has determined that one or several of Consultant's Principal(s) or Project Manager(s) are subject to any provisions of the Anderson Municipal Code relating to conflict of interest, or the provisions of any rules or regulations which may have been promulgated thereunder, then each such person will be required to comply with said provisions in connection with the services they render to the City under this Agreement. City shall advise Consultant of any such provisions prior to the date of execution of this Agreement.

10.6 Exhibits Incorporated
All Exhibits referred to in this Agreement and attached to it are hereby incorporated in it by this reference.

10.7 Independent Contractor
City and Consultant agree that the relationship between them created by this Agreement does not constitute an employer-employee relationship, a partnership or joint-venture relationship of any kind between the City of Anderson and the Consultant. Consultant is not an agent of the City and has no authority to commit the City in any way whatsoever. Consultant shall be solely responsible for the conduct and control of the work performed under this Agreement. Consultant shall be free to render professional consulting services to others during the term of this Agreement, so long as such activities do not interfere with or diminish Consultant's ability to fulfill the obligations established herein to City.

10.8 Integration; Amendment
This Agreement represents the entire understanding of City and Consultant as to those matters contained herein. No prior oral or written understanding shall be of any force or effect with respect to those matters covered in it. This Agreement may not be modified or altered except by amendment in writing signed by both parties.

10.9 Jurisdiction
This Agreement shall be administered and interpreted under the laws of the State of California.

Jurisdiction of litigation arising from this Agreement shall be in that state. If any part of this Agreement shall be in conflict with applicable laws, such part shall be inoperative, null, and void insofar as it is in conflict with said laws, but the remainder of the Agreement shall continue to be in full force and effect.

10.10 Notice to Proceed; Progress; Completion
Professional Services Agreement:

Update to Urban Water Management Plan 5
Upon execution of this Agreement by the parties, City shall give Consultant written notice to proceed with the work. Such notice may authorize Consultant to render all of the services contemplated herein, or such portions or phases as may be mutually agreed upon. In the latter event, City shall, in its sole discretion, issue subsequent notices from time to time regarding further portions or phases of the work. Upon receipt of such notices, Consultants shall diligently proceed with the work authorized and complete it within the agreed time period.

10.11 Ownership of Documents
Title to all documents, drawings, specifications, and the like with respect to work performed under this Agreement shall vest with City at such time as City has compensated Consultant, as provided herein, for the services rendered by Consultant in connection with which they were prepared.

10.12 Subcontracts
Consultant shall be entitled, to the extent determined appropriate by Consultant, to subcontract any portion of the work to be performed under this Agreement. Consultant shall be responsible to City for the actions of persons and firms performing subcontract work. The subcontracting of work by Consultant shall not relieve Consultant, in any manner, of the obligations and requirements imposed upon Consultant by this Agreement.

10.13 Term; Termination
The term of this Agreement shall commence upon City's issuance to Consultant of a notice to proceed for all or a portion of the work, as hereinabove provided, and shall end upon City's acceptance and payment for all or such portion of the work as was authorized by such notice, including any and all retentions.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, City may, in its sole discretion, terminate this Agreement at any time and for any reason whosoever by giving at least ten (10) da}rs' prior written notice of such termination to Consultant.

10.14 Notices
Any notices required to be given pursuant to this Agreement shall be deemed to have been given by their deposit, postage prepaid, in the United States Postal Service, addressed to the parties as follows:
a. To City: Jeff Kiser, City Manager
Professional Services Agreement:

Update to Urban Water Management Plan 6
b. To Consultant:

City of Anderson
1887 Howard Street
Anderson, CA 96007
Nothing hereinabove shall prevent either City or Consultant from personally delivering any such notices to the other.

SECTION 11- SPECIAL PROVISIONS
This Agreement shall include all special provisions, if any, as are set forth on EXHIBIT "E" entitled "SPECIAL PROVISIONS."
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have made and executed this Agreement the day and year first above written.

CITY OF ANDERSON
Jeff Kiser
City Manager
Date
ATTEST:

Cindy White
City Clerk
Professional Services Agreement:

Update to Urban Water Management Plan
PACE ENGINEERING, INC.

Print Name:-------
Title: ---------
Date
7 EXHIBIT "A"

UPDATE TO URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
Project will provide an update to the City of Anderson's (City) Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP).

Professional Services Agreement: EXHIBIT"A"
EXHIBIT "B"
SCOPE OF SERVICES-BASIC; SCOPE OF SERVICES
The consultant shall provide services as described in the "UWMP PROPOSAL" as prepared by PACE Engineering on January 05, 2022. Scope is attached.

Professional Services Agreement: EXHIBIT"B"
EXHIBIT "C"
SCOPE OF SERVICES-ADDITIONAL; COMPLETION SCHEDULE
No additional services are scheduled at this time. Completion scheduled for September 2022.

Professional Services Agreement: EXHIBIT "C"
EXHIBIT "D"
COMPENSATION; PAYMENT OF FEES
The consultant shall provide services as described in the "UWMP Proposal" as prepared by PACE Engineering on January 05, 2022. Scope is attached.

The lump sum fee for the services as describe in Exhibit "B" - Scope of Services, is $30,000.00
Personal Services Agreement: EXHIBIT "D"
EXHIBIT "E"

SPECIAL PROVISIONS

INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR CONSULT ANT
CONSULTANT shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims and injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the work hereunder by the CONSULTANT, his agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. The cost of such insurance shall be the sole responsibility of the CONSULTANT.

A. Minimum Scope of Coverage:

Insurance shall cover:

1. Professional Liability.

2. Comprehensive General Liability.

3. Automobile Liability.

4. Workers Compensation.

B. Minimum Limits of Insurance:

1. Professional Liability: S1 ,000,000 errors and omissions.

2. Comprehensive General Liability: Sl,000,000 combined single Limit per occurrence for bodily injurr, personal injury and propertr damage.

3. Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage.

4. Workers Compensation: Limits as set forth in the Labor Code of the State of California.

C. Deductibles:

Any deductibles must be declared to and approved by the City.

D. Other Insurance Provisions:

The Policies must contain the following provisions:

1. General Liability and Automobile Liability Coverage:
a. The City, its officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the CONSULTANT; premises owned, leased, or used by the CONSULTANT; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the CONSULTANT.

Professional Services Agreement: EXHIBIT "E"
The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officials, employees and volunteers. b. The CONSULT ANT's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance maintained by the City, its officials, employees and volunteers shall be excess ofCONSULTANT's insurance and shall not contribute with it. c. Any failure to comply with the reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officials, employees and volunteers. d. coverage shall state that CONSULTANT's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the insurer's liability.

2. Workers Compensation:

The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City, its officials, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by CONSULTANT for the City.

3. All Coverage:

Each insurance policy required herein shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days advance written notice to City by certified mail, return receipt requested.

E. Acceptability of Insurers:

Insurance shall be placed with insurers admitted to do business in California and with a Best rating of no less than A+.

F. Verification of Coverage:

CONSULTANT shall furnish the City with certificates of insurance coverage with the City named as an additional insured, and with original endorsements affecting coverage as required by this Agreement. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The certificates are to be received and approved by the City before work commences.

G. Subcontractors:

CONSULTANT shall include all subcontractors as insureds under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and endorsements for each subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the requirements stated herein.

Professional Services Agreement: EXHIBIT "E"

AGENDA ITEM
~anuary 18, 2022, City Council Meeting!
Approved for Submittal By:
~ IA.. ~ IefJ--;;, City Manager
To Be Presented By:
-PJ; vll--
Peter Wickenheiser, Deputy Public Works
To:

Through:

From:

Date:
!SUBJECT
Director
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Anderson City Council Jeff Kiser, City Manager
Peter Wickenheiser, Deputy Public Works Director
January 18, 2022
Approve a Sub-Recipient Cooperation Agreement with Shasta Regional Transportation Agency (SRTA).

I RECOMMENDATION
The Deputy Public Works Director recommends that the City Council:

Authorize the City Manager to execute Sub-Recipient Cooperation Agreement with Shasta Regional Transportation Agency (SRTA); and authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to act as signatory on all matters related to the agreement and any amendments thereto.

I FISCAL IMPACT
In the fiscal year 2021-2022 the City of Anderson is estimated to receive $473,096 for streets and roads projects.

I DISCUSSION and BACKGROUND
Each year state and federal, Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP) funds, are passed through the Shasta Regional Transportation Agency's Overall Work Program to support a broad range of transportation projects defined under Title 23, Section 133 of the Federal Aid for ITEM 8.9c PAGE1 1/18/2022
Highways and the California State Constitution. In order to access these funds, the City of Anderson needs to enter into a sub~recipient agreement with the SRT A. A copy of the proposed agreement is attached for your review. Once reviewed, staff is recommending Council approve the agreement and authorize the City Manager to act as signatory on all matters concerning the agreement and any amendments thereto.
!ATTACHMENT

1. Proposed Agreement
ITEM 8.9c PAGE2 1/18/2022

COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH

SHASTA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

FOR MEMBER AGENCY PARTICIPATION
Representing: County of Shasta, City of Anderson, City of Redding, and City of Shasta Lake
V.8
(January 3, 2022)

COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH

SHASTA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY FOR

MEMBER AGENCY PARTICIPATION
THIS AG REEM ENT is made as of the date of the last signature affixed hereto by and among the cities of Anderson, Redding, Shasta Lake, and the county of Shasta, heretofore named "member agencies."
RECITALS:

WHEREAS, the people residing within the incorporated and unincorporated areas of Shasta County have an interest in a well-coordinated and planned transportation system; and WHEREAS, State and Federal legislators designated the Shasta region as a State Local Transportation Commission in 1972 (PUC §130000 et al.) (Government Code §29532, 29535) and a Federal Metropolitan Planning Organization in 1981 (USC Title 23, §134); and WHEREAS, on July l, 2012, the agency reorganized to form the Shasta Regional Transportation Agency (SRTA), a separate and distinct entity from its member agencies; and WHEREAS, the member agencies desire to establish this Agreement in order to: (1) formally recognize the Shasta Regional Transportation Agency as the regional transportation planning entity under State and Federal law; (2) outline the agency's purpose and functions as defined by those laws as updated from time-to-time; (3) agree to promote a governing structure to address transportation-related needs of regional significance; and (4) facilitate cooperation among its member agencies; and
WHEREAS, transportation and transportation-related challenges and opportunities within the region transcend local governmental boundaries and have Countywide implications; and WHEREAS, there is a demonstrated need for an organization with representatives from the member agencies to provide a forum to address these challenges and opportunities; and WHEREAS, the member agencies believe that a Countywide transportation planning organization, governed by elected officials from among the member agencies is best suited for this type of regional coordination; and
WHEREAS, the member agencies, working together through this organization can exercise initiative, leadership, and responsibility for addressing Countywide transportation-related issues; and
WHEREAS, the Shasta Regional Transportation Agency can conduct certain governmental operations of common interest efficiently and economically through the cooperation of its members and the pooling of common resources.

COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR

SHASTA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY PARTICIPATION
Page I 3
IN WITNESS THEREOF, it is mutually agreed as follows:

1. THE SHASTA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY
By adoption of this Agreement, the parties hereto formally recognize the Shasta Regional Transportation Agency, separate and distinct from its member entities, as the agent which exercises the roles and responsibilities described in this Agreement.

The Shasta Regional Transportation Agency serves as both the Local Transportation Commission as designated by what was then known as the Secretary of the Business, Transportation and Housing Agency for the State of California; (Government Code §29535) and as the Federally designated Metropolitan Planning Organization as approved by the Governor of California for the Shasta County region. Inherent in these State and Federal designations are the following responsibilities:
a. Act as lead-agency for determination of any applicable air quality conformity between transportation plans, transportation programs, and transportation projects and the applicable State Implementation Plan in accordance with Title 23 USC §134;
b. Serve as the regional transportation planning and programming representative for the purpose of acting upon any appropriate proposals which may be presented to it for consideration and for transmission of proposed recommendations to Federal and State agencies;
c. Serve as the regional, multi-jurisdictional organization which may be required by State or Federal law or regulation so that member agencies can continue to qualify for State and Federal funds and programs, and to review and comment on applications for Federal or State funds or programs when appropriate by law or regulation;
d. Provide assistance to member agencies to collect, analyze, and disseminate information which will be of value to member agencies, including Federal census data and information on State and Federal aid programs, and provide technical assistance as may be requested by member agencies;
e. Represent the region for transportation-related issues before State and Federal governments and vigorously express to State and Federal agencies the local government point of view on regionwide problems;
f. Develop transportation-related plans, programs and policies consistent with state and federal requirements, including coordination with local agencies; g. Facilitate cooperation and agreement between local government bodies for transportation-related issues and challenges which are common to its members;

COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR

SHASTA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY PARTICIPATION
Page I 4
h. Coordinate grant efforts, including applying for grants on behalf of the region, or providing technical grant support to member agencies;
i. Manage Transportation Development Act, Regional Surface Transportation, State Transportation Improvement Program, and other funds allocated at the regional level;
j. Provide funding to member agencies as sub-recipients of regional, State, and Federal funds pursuant to Sub-recipient Cooperative Agreements which outline granter requirements associated with the fund sources provided; and k. Other duties as authorized under State and Federal law with respect to Local Transportation Commissions and Metropolitan Planning Organizations.

2. BYLAWS
The Shasta Regional Transportation Agency Board of Directors maintains bylaws guiding agency procedures, functions, officer duties and membership. Amendments to all or a portion of these bylaws are made by the Shasta Regional Transportation Agency Board of Directors in the manner prescribed in the bylaws.

3. POWERS AND FUNCTIONS
Pursuant to the second paragraph in the recitals above, the Shasta Regional Transportation Agency has the following powers to establish and administer the agency, and in the exercise of that power, the Shasta Regional Transportation Agency is authorized in its own name to:
a. Employ an executive director as the chief administrative officer, treasurer, and secretary of the agency;
b. Employ staff and contract for professional services; c. Make and enter into contracts;
d. Acquire, hold, and convey real and personal property; e. Incur debts, obligations, and liabilities;
f. Accept contributions, grants, or loans from any public or private agency or individual, or the United States, or the State of California, or any department, instrumentally, or agency thereof, for the purpose of financing its activities; g. Invest money that is not needed for immediate necessities, as the Shasta Regional Transportation Agency Board of Directors determines advisable, in the same manner, and upon the same conditions as other local entities in accordance with

COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR

SHASTA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY PARTICIPATION
Page I 5

4. Section 53601 of the California Government Code;
h. Exercise the responsibility and duties required of a Local Transportation Commission and a Metropolitan Planning Organization;
i. Sue and be sued, in its own name only, but not in the name or stead of any member agency; and
j. Perform all other acts reasonable and necessary to carry out the purpose of this Agreement;
k. Other duties as may be assigned by the Shasta Regional Transportation Agency Board of Directors, or prescribed in the SRTA Bylaws.

COOPERATION
The parties to this Agreement agree to cooperate to perform the functions outlined in this agreement and assign representatives to serve on the Shasta Regional Transportation Agency.

Each representative shall act on behalf of the Shasta Regional Transportation Agency in consideration of regional challenges and opportunities, subject to any necessary and legal approvals by the legislative bodies of the member agencies. The parties recognize that the resources of the Shasta Regional Transportation Agency are limited and not all needs can be met for all areas of the region at any one time; however, the Shasta Regional Transportation Agency Board of Directors will strive for equity across all jurisdictions of the region and all populations.

Some regional opportunities and decisions may only directly benefit a particular member, but still be in the best interest of the region as a whole. A stronger region ultimately benefits all member agencies.
s. INDEMNITY
Except as may be otherwise agreed in writing between the Shasta Regional Transportation Agency ("SRTA") and member agencies, the debts, liabilities, and obligations of SRTA shall not be debts, liabilities, and obligations of the member agencies.

SRTA and the member agencies each agree to indemnify, defend, and save harmless the other and the other's officers, agents, and employees, from and against any and all claims or losses arising out of, or in any way related to, the indemnifying party's performance under this agreement, including, but not limited to, claims for property damage, personal injury, death, and any legal expenses (such as reasonable attorneys' fees, court costs, investigation costs, and experts' fees), but only in proportion to and to the extent such claims or losses (including reasonable attorneys' fees) are caused by or result from the acts or omissions of the indemnifying party, its officers, agents, or employees. A party's "performance" includes the party's action or inaction and the action or inaction of that party's officers, agents, and employees.

COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR

SHASTA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY PARTICIPATION
Page I 6

6. ATTEST
County of Shasta
Chair, Board of Supervisors
Date:-----------
City of Anderson
Mayor, City of Anderson
Date:-----------
Shasta Regional Transportation Agency
Chair
Date:------------
City of Redding
Mayor, City of Redding
Date:------------
City of Shasta Lake
Mayor, City of Shasta Lake
Date:------------

Anderson City CouncilJanuary 18, 2022

Anderson City Council
January 18, 2022