Anderson City Council
February 21, 2023

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
February 21, 2023
REGULAR SESSION - 6:00 P.M.

ANDERSON CITY HALL
1887 Howard Street

PARTICIPATION BY PUBLIC IN MEETING
Please review the Agenda to determine if the subject you wish to discuss is scheduled for Council consideration. If it is on the Agenda, you will have an opportunity when that matter comes up for discussion to briefly address the Council.

If the subject is not on tonight's Agenda, please complete an Aeenda Reguest Form (on Clerk's table) and present it to the City Council Clerk. You will have the opportunity to speak on the subject under Item 5.2. However, if the item is not on the Agenda, each speaker will be limited to one three (3) minute opportunity to speak, unless the City Council makes an exception due to special circumstances.

The Brown Act prohibits the Council from taking action on any item not placed on the printed Agenda in most cases.

The Brown Act requires any non-confidential documents or writings distributed to a majority of the City Council less than 72 hours before a regular meeting will be made available to members of the public at the same time they are distributed.

City Council meetings are televised and can be seen live on Cable Public Access Channel 181 (previously Channel 11) and on tape delay the following morning at 10:00 a.m. City Council meetings may also be viewed on the City's website at www.d.anclersooLca.us by clicking on the TV icon on the Home Page.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City of Anderson will make available to members of the public any special assistance necessary to participate in this meeting. The public should contact the City Clerk's office (378-6646) to make such a request. Notification 72 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting.

This is an Equal Opportunity Program. Discrimination is prohibited by Federal Law.

Complaints of discrimination may be filed with the Secretary of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. 20250.

City Council Meeting
February 21, 2023

1.0 ROLL CALL - COUNCIL:

REGULAR SESSION - 6;00 P.M,
Councilmember Hunt
Councilmember Gallier
Councilmember Baugh
Vice-Mayor Neutze
Mayor Gallagher

2.0 INVOCATION -Ryan Wildauer, Neighborhood Church of Anderson/Cottonwood, will give the invocation.

3.0 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Councilmember Dan Gallier.

4.0 STUDENT REPORTS
a. Daniel Stroup from the teen center will give an update on current activities. b. A student from Anderson High School will give an update on student activities.

4.3 PROCLAMATION - A Proclamation proclaiming March as Aces, Resilience and Hope Awareness Month will be presented to Susan Morris Wilson, Executive Director\Youth Options Shasta/Youth Violence Prevention Council.

5.2 PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA - This is the time to address public comments by any member of the public to the Council regarding an item not on the agenda. Each comment must be limited to 3 minutes or less and on an item within the City's subject matter jurisdiction. The Brown Act does not permit any action or discussion on items not listed on the agenda. Are there any public comments?

CONSENT AGENDA

6.0 CONSENT AGENDA - Consent Agenda items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any member of the public, staff or City Council may request that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda for separate discussion. Are there any requests to remove any items from the Consent Agenda?

6.1 MINUTES-Approve the minutes of the regular meeting of February 7, 2023.

6.2 WARRANTS - Receive and file warrant 27787 to 27842 in the amount of $169,984.33; Receive and file warrant 27843 to 27937 in the amount of $167,456.74. Receive and file ACH in the amount of $51,426.69.

City Council Meeting
February 21, 2023

6.8 BUILDING - Enact Ordinance No. 853 revising Anderson Municipal Code Chapter 15 and adopting by reference the 2022 Edition of the California Building Standards Code, as introduced on February 7, 2023 (First Reading).

END OF CONSENT CALENDAR

6.11 ITEMS (IF ANY) REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR - Items removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion will be treated as Regular Agenda items and any member of the public may request to address the Council on any such item as it comes up for discussion. Please provide your name and limit your remarks to 3 minutes or less.

REGULAR AGENDA

8.0 REGULAR AGENDA - Regular Agenda Items will be discussed individually and in order.

Any member of the public may request to address the Council on an item as it comes up for discussion. Please provide your name and limit your remarks to 3 minutes or less.

CITY COUNCIL

8.1 COMMISSION ON AGING BOARD APPOINTMENT
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Appoint a member to the Shasta County Commission on Aging advisory commission.

CITY MANAGER

8.3 INITIATIVE NO. 21-0042A-1 TAXPAYER PROTECTION AND GOVERNMENT

ACCOUNTABILITY ACT
RECOMMENDED ACTION;
Consider adoption of a Resolution opposing Initiative No. 21-0042A1, the Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act.

ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER/FINANCE DIRECTOR/TREASURER

8.5 2022-2023 MID-YEAR BUDGET UPDATE
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

No action is requested at time as this is informational only.

11.0 COUNCIL REPORTS /COMMENTS - City Council members will report on attendance at conferences/meetings reimbursed at City expense (Requirement of Assembly Bi/11234.)

14.0 ADJOURN~ The City Council will adjourn to March 7, 2023,

CITY OF ANDERSON

PROCLAMATION

PROCLAIMING MARCH AS

ACES, RESILIENCE AND HOPE AWARENESS MONTH
WHEREAS, Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) and trauma have been identified as one the major public health issues in California and the United States; and WHEREAS, the research confirms with scientific evidence that trauma during development increases the risk of physical, mental and behavior problems later in life; and WHEREAS, Shasta County has a significantly higher level of ACEs than the statewide average; and
WHEREAS, adverse childhood experiences include experiences in children, prior to the age of 18 years, of physical and emotional neglect; physical, emotional and sexual abuse; and household dysfunction including an incarcerated relative, substance use, divorce, domestic violence and mental illness; and
WHEREAS, Shasta County has had several community traumas during the past decade, including the Carr Fire in July 2018, the Zogg Fire in September 2020, the Dixie Fire in July 2021 and the pandemic, that have exacerbated the effects of ACEs; and WHEREAS, the Strengthening Families Collaborative (Far Northern Regional Center, First 5 Shasta, Pathways to Hope for Children, Northern Valley Catholic Social Service, One Safe Place, Shasta County Office of Education, Shasta County Probation, Shasta County Health and Human Services Public Health, Shasta County Health and Human Services Behavioral Health and Social Services, Shasta Headstart, Youth Options Shasta), was established in 2012 with the mission of strengthening families to overcome adversity by building hope and resilience; and WHEREAS, the Strengthening Families Collaborative meets monthly to support and promote resilience and hope in Shasta County; and
WHEREAS, the City of Anderson strongly supports the efforts of the Strengthening Families Collaborative to build a healthy community of strong and resilient families; and NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Anderson hereby proclaims support for the efforts of the Strengthening Families Collaborative to increase public awareness about adverse childhood experiences, resilience and hope in Anderson and Shasta County.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, 1 have hereunto set my hand
and caused the Corporate Seal of the City of Anderson to be affixed this 21st day of February, 2023.

Mike Gallagher, Mayor of the City of Anderson

ANDERSON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Regular Meeting
February 7, 2023
DRAFT
SPECIAL MEETING - 5;00 p.m. Brown Act Trainin&
The special meeting was held at 5:00 p.m. City Attorney Collin Bogener taught a workshop on the Brown Act.

REGULAR SESSION
The regular session was called to order at 6:00 p.m.

ROLL CALL
Councilmembers present: Councilmember Hunt
Councilmember Gallier
Councilmember Baugh
Vice-Mayor Neutze
Mayor Gallagher
Also present: City Manager Jeff Kiser, Assistant City Manager Liz Cottrell, City Attorney Collin Bogener, Police Chief Jon Poletski and City Clerk Christy White.

INVOCATION
Pastor Perry Peterson, Crossroads Bible Fellowship, gave the invocation.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Mike Gallagher led the Pledge of Allegiance.

INTRODUCTIONS
Police Chief Jon Poletski introduced new Officer Ryan Kwiatkowski and conducted his swearing in and badge pinning.

PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA
Diana Ramirez and Brad Meade from Waste Management invited Council and the public to tour the landfill.

ITEM 6.1 2/21/2023
City Council Meeting
February 21, 2023

CONSENT AGENDA
By motion made, second (Hunt/Baugh) and carried by a 5-0 vote, Council took the following action.

Approved the minutes of the regular meeting of January 17, 2023.

Received and filed warrant 27608 to 27666 in the amount of $82,904.25; Received and filed warrant 27667 to 27739 in the amount of $173,449.84; Received and filed warrant 27740 to 27786 in the amount of $139,252.09. Received and filed ACH in the amount of $56,531.15.

Received and filed the quarterly treasurer's report for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2022.

Vote: AYES: Councilmembers Hunt, Baugh, Gallier, Neutze and Mayor Gallagher.

NOES: None.

ABSTAIN: None.

ABSENT: None.

PUBLIC HEARINGS
ALL NOTICES WERE GIVEN ACCORDING TO LAW.

CITY ATTORNEY

ADOPT A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE ANDERSON FEE SCHEDULE TO INCREASE THE

FEES FOR CEQA STAFF WORK
City Attorney Collin Bogener gave a staff report and answered questions from Council.

The public hearing was opened and closed at 6: 13 pm, no public comments were received.

By motion made, seconded (Neutze/Gallier) and carried by a 5-0 vote Council voted to adopt Resolution No 23-08 amending the Anderson Fee Schedule to change the subject line "Environmental Assessments and Negative Declarations" to "Environmental AssessmentsCategorical Exemption, Initial Study/Negative Declaration, Mitigated Negative Declaration, and Environmental Impact Report" and to change the fee for the work to "actual costs." Vote: AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Councilmembers Neutze, Gallier, Hunt, Baugh and Mayor Gallagher.

None.

None.

None.

City Council Meeting
February 21, 2023

ADOPTION OF UPDATED CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS CODE
Senior Building Official Jeff Maze gave a staff report and answered questions from Council.

The public hearing was opened at 6: 17 p.m.

Darin Hale commented with a question as to why we have to adopt the current code.

The public hearing was closed at 6: 19 p.m.

By motion made, seconded (Baugh/Gallier) and carried by a 5-0 vote Council voted to Introduce Ordinance No 853 (First Reading) revising Anderson Municipal Code Chapter 15 and adopting by reference the 2022 Edition of the California Building Standards Code, and set for enactment (Second Reading) on February 21, 2023.

Vote: AYES: Councilmembers Baugh, Gallier, Hunt, Neutze and Mayor Gallagher.

NOES: None.

ABSTAIN: None.

ABSENT: None.

REGULAR AGENDA

CITY COUNCIL

PLANNING COMMISSIONER APPOINTMENT
Council member Dan Gallier appointed Penny Grant to Planning Commission for a term concurrent with his term on the City Council.

By motion made, seconded (Gallier/Baugh) and carried by a 5-0 vote Council voted to approve the appointment of Penny Grant to Planning Commission.

Vote: AYES: Councilmembers Gallier, Baugh, Hunt, Neutze, Mayor Gallagher.

NOES: None.

ABSTAIN: None.

ABSENT: None.

SHASTA MOSQUITO & VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT REPRESENTATIVE Mayor Mike Gallagher brought the appointment of Darin Hale to the attention of Council.

By motion made, seconded (Neutze/Hunt) and carried by a 5-0 vote Council voted to approve the appointment of Darin Hale to the Shasta Mosquito & Vector Control District Board.

Vote: AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Councilmembers Neutze, Hunt, Gallier, Baugh and Mayor Gallagher.

None.

None.

None.

City Council Meeting
February 21, 2023

CITY MANAGER

DISCUSS INCREASING THE SALARY FOR DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS AND

ADMINISTRATION
City Manager Jeff Kiser gave a staff report and answered questions from Council.

By motion made, seconded (Baugh/Gallier) and carried by a 5-0 vote Council voted to increase the salary for the Director of Operations and Administration position.

Vote: AYES:

NOES:

Councilmembers Baugh, Gallier, Hunt, Neutze and Mayor Gallagher.

None.

ABSTAIN: None.

ABSENT: None.

COUNCIL REPORTS/COMMENTS
Councilmembers used this time to report on meetings and activities they participated in and to announce upcoming events.

Public Comment on Closed Session Items - None.
6:34 p.m.: The City Council convened to Closed Session.

CLOSED SESSION
C.S.1 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION(§ 54956.9) Name of Case: Dodson v. City of Anderson, et al., Case No. 22CV-0201078 6:43 p.m.: The City Council reconvened to Open Session.

CLOSED SESSION ANNOUNCEMENT
Mayor Gallagher announced that the Council sat in Closed Session giving staff direction with no reportable action.

ADJOURNMENT
6;43p.m,; The City Council adjourned to February 21, 2023, Mike Gallagher, Mayor
ATTEST:

Christy White, City Clerk

AGENDA ITEM
!February 21. 2023 City Council Meeting
To:

Through:

Honorable Mayor and Members of the Anderson City Council Jeff Kiser, City Manager
From: Liz Cottrell, Finance Director /Treasurer
Date: February 21, 2023
!SUBJECT
Receive and File Weekly Warrant Registers.

I RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file warrant 27787 to 27842 in the amount of $169,984.33; Receive and file warrant 27843 to 27937 in the amount of $167,456.74. Receive and file ACH in the amount of $51,426.69.
!ATTACHMENT
Warrant Registers.

ITEM 6.2 PAGE1 2/21/2023
2/14/2023 1:03 PM A/P BISTQRY CBECI( REPORT &>Mia: 2
VENDOR SET: 01 Anderson
BANJC: PC Pooled Cash -AP
DATE RANGE: 0/00/0000 THRO 99/99/9999
CHECK INVOICE CHECK CIIECK CBEClt
VENDOR I.D. twCS STATUS DATE AMOUNT DISCOUNT NO STATUS AMOUNT 010771 AMITY VALDEZ R 2/01/2023 027787 330.00
000048 AAMIGO IRRIGATION SUPPLY ,. 2/03/2023 027788 64.67 000083 ACE HARDWARE P. 2/03/2023 027789 2,279.08
000410 ANDERSON GLASS P. 2/03/2023 027791 811.23
000615 AT, T CAI.NET ll 2/03/2023 027792 1,542.03
000974 BEELER TRACTOR COMPANY P. 2/03/2023 027793 24.67 001224 STEPHEN Bl.UNI( ll 2/03/2023 027794 75.00
001614 B!JTTE GLENN COMMtJNITY COLI.EGE R 2/03/2023 027795 240.00 011797 CANYON COUNTRY NOODNOIUCS a 2/03/2023 027796 17.00 001881 CARREL'S OFFICE MACHINES ll 2/03/2023 027797 138.88 002047 CRARTER COMMtJNICATIONS R 2/03/2023 027798 1,357.76 002489 LIZ COTTRELL ll 2/03/2023 027799 75.00
002634 CROWN MOTORS R 2/03/2023 027800 280.B4
002779 DATAPII.OT, INC. R 2/03/2023 027801 2,495.00
002857 DE I.AGE LANDEN FINANCIAL SVC a 2/03/2023 027802 1,922.37 011796 MARIE DELGADO R 2/03/2023 027803 25.00
003423 ENBRPOWER ll 2/03/2023 027804 1,779.00
003590 FASTENERS INC. It 2/03/2023 027805 128.48
003927 MID GALLAGHER R 2/03/2023 027806 1,028.00
004318 PETER GRIGGS A 2/03/2023 027807 94.50
011780 IltON ADVISORS, I.LC It 2/03/2023 027808 900.00
011793 JOHN RILEY CONSTRUCTION a 2/03/2023 027809 6,840.00 2/U/2023 1:03 PM A/P HISTORY CIIEClt REPORT PA.Ga: 3
IENOOR SET: 01 Anderson
ilANJt: PC Pooled Cash -AP
)ATE RANGE: 0/00/0000 THRO 99/99/9999
CHECK INVOICE cm:a:: CHECK CIIECJt
IENOOR I,O. MANS STATUS DATE AMOUNT DISCOUNT NO STATOS AMOUNT )05401 NICHOLAS JONES R 2/03/2023 027810 75.00
)11758 PAOLA JONES ll 2/03/2023 027811 uo.oo
)05634 JEl'I' KISER R 2/03/2023 027812 75.00
)06153 LOUCJtS LIIHDSCAPE SUPPLY R 2/03/2023 027813 198.41 lll792 MISSIONSQUARE-302204 ll 2/03/2023 027814 3,130.00 )11798 MOONLIGHT MEDIA R 2/03/2023 027815 lU.22
)07110 KITT MORRISON, PH.O. R 2/03/2023 027816 450.00
)07134 N.C.G.T. TRUST~ P. 2/03/2023 027Bl7 108,670.00
)07342 NORCAL RENTALS & SALES P. 2/03/2023 027Bl8 63.65 )07493 COP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, LLC ,. 2/03/2023 027819 259.81 )07616 PACE ANALYTICAL SVCS. , LLC ft 2/03/2023 027820 930.08 )07657 PAINT MART Jt 2/03/2023 027821 380. 78
Jll79S PLATINUM HOME & AUTO GLASS R 2/03/2023 027822 U0.00 )07967 PLA'l'll' ft 2/03/2023 027B23 375.33
307998 JON POLETSKI !l 2/03/2023 027824 75.00
308270 NATHAN RAMIREZ ft 2/03/2023 027825 75.00
311714 ROSSELL ROBERTS Jt 2/03/2023 027826 75.00
309256 SCP DISTRIBUTORS, LLC R 2/03/2023 027827 1,406.05 309420 SHASTA COUNTY AQMO ft 2/03/2023 027828 27.00
309441 SHASTA COUNTY RECORDER a 2/03/2023 027B29 17.00
309442 SHASTA COUNTY JIBSOORCE MGMT R 2/03/2023 027830 2,442.83 009564 SHH CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC It. 2/03/2023 027831 24,173.75 2/14/2023 1:03 PM A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT PA011 :

VENDOR SET: 01 An._r.on ' BANK: PC Pooled Ca•h -AP
DATE RANGE: 0/00/0000 TIIRU 99/99/9999

CHECK INVOICE CHECK CHECK CHECK
VENDOR I.D. lWIE STATUS DATE AMOUNT DISCOUNT NO STATUS AMOUNT 010255 T ANDS DVBE, INC. ll 2/03/2023 027832 Ul.26
0102'11 TABLETOP PRODUCTIONS P. 2/03/2023 02'1833 250.00 010346 TELSTAR INSTRUMENTS, INC. II. 2/03/2023 02'1834 1,422.30 010728 UNIVERSITY ENTERPRISES, INC ll 2/03/2023 02'1835 75.00 010728 UNIVERSITY ENTERPRISES, INC R 2/03/2023 02'1836 195.85 010732 Ul!'S a. 2/03/2023 027837 60.00
010784 ADILENE VALENZUELA P. 2/03/2023 027838 350 . 00
010918 VIRTUAL PROJECT MANAGER II. 2/03/2023 027839 1,250.00 011021 MEGAN WALSH ll 2/03/2023 027840 17.50
011260 CHRISTY WHITE R 2/03/2023 027841 75.00
011305 PETER WICKENHEISER a. 2/03/2023 027842 75.00
* * T O '1' A L S * * NO INVOICE AMOUNT DISCOUNTS CHECK AMOUNT REGULAR CHECKS: 55 169,984.33 0.00 169,984.33
HAND CHECKS: 0 o.oo 0.00 0.00
DRAFTS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
EFT: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
t!Clf <:BECKS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
VOID CHECKS: 0 VOID DEBITS 0.00
VOID CREDITS o.oo 0.00 0.00
TOTAL ERRORS: 0
NO INVOICE AMOUNT DISCOUNTS Clll!:CK AMOUNT
VENDOR SET: 01 BANK: PC TOTALS: 55 169,984.33 0.00 169,984.33 BANK: PC TOTALS: 55 169,984.33 0.00 169,984.33
REPORT TOTALS: 55 169,984.33 0.00 169,984.33
02/01/2023 ACH PERS 51,426.69
For Payroll Ending 01/20/2023 1f.reh:o2-~ Date
02/03/2023 VOIDED CHECK# 27790
2/10/2023 10:02 AM A/ P CHECK REGISTER tM£: l
PACKET: 00081 Reqular Payments-02/10/23 OD
VENDOR SET: 01 **** CHECK LISTING****
BANK PC Fooled Cash -AP

CHECK CHECK CHECK CHECK
VENDOR NAME/ I.D. DESC TYPE DATE DISCOUNT AMOUNT NOi AMOUNT 000323 AMERICAN FIDELITY ASSURANCE CO R 2/10/2023 027843 282.68 000406 ANDERSON FIRE PROTECTION DIST. R 2/10/2023 027844 20,498.26 000506 APOA ANO. POLICE OFFICER R 2/10/2023 027845 1,200.00 000722 SCOTT BAILEY R 2/10/2023 027846 346.20
000968 DEBBY BECKMAN R 2/10/2023 027847 230.80
001224 STEPHEN BLUNK R 2/10/2023 027848 346.20
011799 KRISTINE BUDZINSICY R 2/10/2023 027849 10,148.20 001654 CA SOCIETY OF MUNCFL FIN. OFF. R 2/10/2023 027850 125.00 001750 CALIFORNIA SAFETY CO . R 2/10/2023 027851 1,880.00 001757 CALL CENTER SALES PRO R 2/10/2023 027852 28.10
001814 KYLE CARPENTER R 2/10/2023 027853 3415.20
001881 CARREL'S OFFICE MACHINES R 2/10/2023 027854 127. 06 011804 TERRIE CARSON R 2/10/2023 027855 595.00
001940 MELANIE CATAHIO R 2/10/2023 027856 138.48
011800 JASMIN CHAVEZ R 2/10/2023 027857 350.00
002101 CHRIS CHIMENTI R 2/10/2023 027858 346.20
002165 CITY OF REDDING R 2/10/2023 027859 3,670.73
002167 CITY OF REDDING CUSTOMER SERVICE DI R 2/10/2023 027860 218.07 002199 CLARK PEST CONTROL OF STOCKTON Inc. R 2/10/2023 027861 330.00 002561 CRAFCO, INC. R 2/10/2023 027862 118.53
002716 CWEA R 2/10/2023 027863 200.00
2/10/2023 10:02 AM A / P CHECK REGISTER
PACDT: 00081 Reqular Payments-02/10/23 DD
VENDOR SET: 01
8ANlC PC Pooled Cash -AP
VENDOR NAME / I . D. DESC
011801 DBL MEDIA, INC.
002960 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (SOU)
003063 DIV. OF THE STATE ARCHITECT
003451 ENTERPRISE AUTO PARTS
003452 ENTERPRISE FM TRUST
003534 EWING
003590 FASTENERS INC.
003670 TYLER FINCH
003685 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY
011805 SIERRA FLORES
003744 NASH FOLDEN
003927 MIKE GALLAGHER
**** CHECK LISTING****

CHECK CHECK

TYPE DATE
R 2/10/2023
R 2/10/2023
ATTN: SB 1186 R 2/10/2023
R 2/10/2023
ENTERPRISE FLEET MG R 2/10/2023
R 2/10/2023
R 2/10/2023
R 2/10/2023
R 2/10/2023
R 2/10/2023
R 2/10/2023
R 2/10/2023
004096 GILES LOCK~ SECURITY SYSTEMS, Inc. R 2/10/2023
004248 GRAINGER R 2/10/2023
004354 GREGGORY GUNDERSEN R 2/10/2023
004436 MICHAEL HALLAGAN R 2/10/2023
004623 ERIC HAYNES R 2/10/2023
004811 HILLYARD, INC. R 2/10/2023
004968 STACY HUBANKS R 2/10/2023
005021 MELISSA HUNT R 2/10/2023
005066 I.I.M.C. R 2/10/2023
2 CHECK CHECK
DISCOUNT AMOUNT NOf AMOONT
027864 3,250.00
027865 253.38
027866 36.00
027867 1,120.29
027868 24, 083.74
027869 1,907.81
027870 161 .60
027871 JU .20
027812 12.5 .00
027873 17.50
027874 346.20
027875 137. 00
027876 290.70
027877 1,372.96
02787' 346.20
027879 346.20
027880 346.20
027881 419.38
027882 250. 00
027883 580.56
027884 200 . 00
2/10/2023 10:02 AM A/ P CHECK REGISTER PAGC: 3
PACKET: 00081 Regular Payments-02/10/23 DD
VENDOR SET: 01 •••• CHECK LISTING••••
BANI( PC Pooled Cash -AP

CHECK CRBCK CHECK CRECI(
VENDOR NAME/ I.D. DESC TYPE DATE DISCOONT AMOUNT NOf AMOUNT 005111 INLAHI> BUSINESS MACHINES, INC R 2/10/2023 027885 271 .Sl 005153 JESSICA ISBELL R 2/10/2023 027886 230.80
005169 J & T CONSULTING, INC , ll U10/2023 027887 1,883.00 011803 J.C. BARRY MANUFACTURING, INC. R 2/ 10/2023 027888 372.16 0052S7 JENNIFER JIMERSON R 2/10/2023 027889 250.00
011793 JOHN RILEY CONSTRUCTION R 2/10/2023 027890 8,120.62 0054'5 K & S STAFFING SOLUTIONS, INC. R 2/10/2023 027891 5,119.29 005472 CRERRIAUNNA KAROW R 2/10/2023 027892 75.00
005634 JEFF KISER R 2/10/2023 027893 137.00
005647 AUSTIN KLEIN R 2/10/2023 021194 103.86
005939 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES R 2/10/2023 027895 6, S46. 00 006153 LOUCKS LANDSCAPE SUPPLY R 2/10/2023 027896 4,560.63 006497 JESSE MAYFIELD R 2/10/2023 027897 346.20
006643 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. R 2/10/2023 027898 48.15 006723 DARREN MENDOZA R 2/10/2023 027899 346 .20
011792 MISSIONSQUARE-302204 R 2/10/2023 027900 2,880.00 006958 MOORE & BOGENER R 2/10/2023 027901 8,948.00
007058 MT. SHASTA SPRING WATER R 2/10/2023 027902 182.29 007118 MUTUAL OF OMAHA PAYMENT PROCESSING R 2/10/2023 027903 3,711.12 007348 NORMAC R 2/10/2023 027904 4,762.46
007474 02 STAFFING, INC. R 2/10/2023 027905 823.50
2/10/2023 10:02 AM A/ P CHEC!t REGISTER 4
PACKET: 00081 Regular Paymenta-02/10/23 DD
VENDOR SE'l': 01 **** CIIECX LISTING****
BANl< PC Pooled Cash -AP

CHECK CHECK CHECK CHECK
VENDOR NAME / I.D. DESC TYPE DATE DISCOUNT AMOUNT NOi AMOUNT 007493 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, LLC R 2/10/2023 027906 948.52 007616 PACE ANALYTICAL SVCS., LLC ll ~/10/2023 027907 2,581.60 007618 PACE SUPPLY CORP. R 2/10/2023 027908 6,393 . 07
007630 PACIFIC GAS, ELECTRIC R 2/10/2023 027909 2,336.49 007750 PAYLESS BUILDING SUPPLY R 2/10/2023 027910 383.12 007854 BRYON PETERSON R 2/10/2023 027911 84.00
007967 PLATT R 2/10/2023 027912 129.60
007998 JON POLETSKI R 2/10/2023 027913 311 .58
008017 ROBYN POPE-BURGESS R 2/10/2023 027914 !il2 .31
008061 PRAIRIE SQUARES R 2/10/2023 027915 6"7 . 20
008129 PROHO'l'IONAL IMAGES R 2/10/2023 027916 69. 71
008270 NATHAN RAMIREZ R 2/10/2023 027917 346.20
008298 MORGAN RAU R 2/10/2023 027918 110.00
008399 REDDING PRINTING COMPANY,INC R 2/10/2023 027919 682.06 008862 ALYSSA RUDE R 2/10/2023 027920 225.00
009321 HOPE SETH R 2/10/2023 027921 2,280.00
009433 SHASTA COUNTY DEPT. OF HOUSING R 2/10/2023 027922 1,508.46 009437 SHASTA COUNTY INFO. TECH. DEPT R 2/10/2023 027923 2,156.15 011802 SHASTA GARAGE DOORS R 2/10/2023 027924 4,581.00
009924 TYLER SPURGEON R 2/10/2023 027925 346.20
009971 DAVID STARKEY R 2/10/2023 027926 346.20
2/10/2023 10:02 1'M A/ P CHECK JIZGISTER
Pl.CUT: 000B1 Regular Pai,m.nta-02/10/23 DD
VENDOR SET: 01
BANJt PC
**** CHECK LISTING****
Pooled Cuh -AP
CUCJO. CHECJO.

VENDOR NAME / I . D. DESC TYPE DATE
00998B STATE OF CALil'OllKIA R 2/10/2023
010187 SUNRISE EXCAVATING, INC. R 2/10/2023
010236 SWRCB FEES R 2/10/2023
010255 T ANDS DVB£, INC. R 2/10/2023
010579 TRANSUNION RISK AND ALTERNATIV DATA SOLUTIONS, INC R 2/10/2023 010749 US BANX VOYAGER FLEET SYSTEMS US Bank Nat'l Assoc R 2/10/2023 010754 US POSTAL SERVICE- CMRS-POC POSTAGE BY PHONE R 2/10/2023 010756 USA BLUEBOOK HD SUPPLY FACILITIE R 2/10/2023
010771 AMITY VALDEZ R 2/10/2023
010881 VESTRA RESOURCES INC . R 2/10/2023
0116H WELLS FARGO VENDOR FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC R 2/10/2023 * * TOTALS * * NOi DISCOUNTS
REGULAR CHECKS : 95 0 . 00
HANDWRITTEN CHECKS: 0 0 . 00
PRE-WRITE CHECKS : 0 0. 00
DRAFTS: 0 0 . 00
VOID CHECKS: 0 0 . 00
NON CHECXS : 0 0 . 00
CORRECTIONS: 0 0.00
REGISTER TOTALS : 95 0.00
CBECJO.

DISCOUNT AMOUNT NO#
027927
027928
02U29
027930
027931
0271132
0271133
027934
027935
0271136
027937

CHECK AMT TOTAL APPLIED
167,456 . 74 167 , 456 . 74
0 . 00 0.00
0 . 00 0 . 00
o.oo 0.00
0 . 00 0 . 00
0 . 00 0.00
0 . 00 0.00
167,456.74 167,456.74
CHECK
AMOUNT

30.00 365.00
1,451.00
1,083. 49
225.00
221 . 19
5,000 . 00
890 . 12
92 . 32
4,582 . 26
357 . 45
Date

AGENDA ITEM
I Feb. 21, 2023, City Council Meetin~
Approved for Submittal By:

To Be Presented By:
aze, Senior Buildin
To:

Through:

Honorable Mayor and Members of the Anderson City Council Jeff Kiser, City Manager
From:

Date:
!SUBJECT
Jeffery Maze, Senior Building Inspector
February 21, 2023
Adoption of updated California Building Standards Code
!RECOMMENDATION
Enact Ordinance No. 853 revising Anderson Municipal Code Chapter 15 and adopting by reference the 2022 Edition of the California Building Standards Code, as introduced on February 7, 2023 (First Reading).

I FISCAL IMPACT
The adoption of the 2022 California Building Codes will have a minor negative fiscal impact.

While all building and plan check fees are proposed to remain the same, the new Codes have additional requirements that will take more time to verify compliance during the plan check process.

I DISCUSSION and BACKGROUND
In January 2023, the State Building Standards Commission adopted the 2022 California Building Standards Code with State amendments. It was published in July 2022 and became effective throughout the State in January 2022.

ITEM 6.8 PAGE1 2/21/2023
Building Codes are typically updated every three years and adopted by the State with amendments. The State mandates through the Health and Safety Code that the CBSC be enforced by local jurisdictions. Local jurisdictions may not adopt lesser construction standards than those mandated by the State; however, they may adopt more stringent standards when based on findings of fact for climatic, geographical, or topographical reasons.

Although the 2022 CBSC will entail many changes in the way buildings and structures are constructed, staff does not recommend modifications to the code other than continuing to provide the clarifications that the City has previously provided. !ATTACHMENT

1. Ordinance
ITEM 6.8 PAGE2 2/21/2023
ORDINANCE NO. 853

AN ORDINANCE OFTHEQTYCOUNQL OF THE CITY OF ANDERSON
REPEALING AND REENACTING CERTAIN CHAPTERS AND SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 15 OF THE ANDERSON MUNICIPAL CODE, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE 2022 EDITION OFTHE

CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS CODE, KNOWN AS THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE24
INCORPORATING:

THE CALI FOR NIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, 2022 EDITION, PU BLISH ED BY THE INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL,

AS ADOPTED BY THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS COMMISSION, The California Building code, 2022 edition, based on the 2021 international building code published by the international code coun:il, as amended and adopted by the California &J.ilding Standards Commission,
the California Residential Building Code, 2022 edition, based on the 2021 international residential code published by the international code council, as amended and adopted by the California building standards comrrission
the California Electrical Code, 2022 edition, based on the 2020 edition of the national electrical code published by the national fire protection association, as adopted by the California building stan <lards com mission,
the California mechanical code, 2022 edition, based on the 2021 uniform mechanical code published by the international association of plumbing and mechanical officials, as adopted by the California building standards commission,
The California Plumbing Code, 2022 edition, based on the 2021 uniform plumbing code published by the international association of plumbing and mechanical officials, as adopted by the California building standards commission,
The California Energy code, 2022 edition, published by the international code council, as adopted by the California building standards commission,
the California historical building code, 2022 edition, published by the international code council, as adopted by the California building standards commission, the California green building standards code, 2022 edition, published by the international code council, as adopted by the California building standards commission,
Ordinance No. 853
February 21, 2023

the California existing buildings code, 202 2 edition, published by the international code council, as amended and adopted by thee California building standards commission. the California referenced standards code, 2022 edition as published by the international code council, as adopted by the California building standards commission, supplementing those portions of California code of regulations, title 24 aside ntified herein, the international swimming pool and spa code, 2021 edition, as published by the international code council,
the California fire code, 2022 edition, based on the 2021 international fire code as published by the international code council, as amended and adopted by the California building standards commission,
and adopting administrative and non-building regulations contained in the above referenced codes.

The City Council of the City of Anderson does ordain as follows:

SECTlO N 1-REPEAL
Sections 15.02.020, 15.02.025, and 15.20.010, of the Anderson Municipal Code is repealed in its entirety.

SECTlON 2 - PURPOSE AND AUTHORITY
The purpose of this ordinance is to adopt by reference the 2022 edition of the California Building Standards Code, Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, subject to the definitions, clarifications, and amendments set forth in this ordinance. The purpose of this ordinance is also to provide minimum reg uirements and standards for the protection of the public safety, health, property and welfare of the City of Anderson. This ordina nee is adopted under the authority of California Government Code Section 5002 2.2 and California Health and Safety Code Section 18941.5.

SECTION 3-BUILDING CODE
Section 15.02.020 of the Anderson Municipal Code is enacted to read:
"15.02.020 Adoption of Uniform Codes.

Ordinance No. 853
February 21, 2023

The following publications are hereby adopted by reference and incorporated into this Code, except as expressly amended or superseded by the provisions of this Chapter.

A. The 2022 Edition of the California Administrative Code as published by the International Code Council, and as adopted by the California Building Standards Commission, Part l Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations.

B. The 2022 Edition of the California Building Code, based upon the 2021 International Building Code, including, among the Appendices, Appendix Chapter H (Signs), Appendix Chapter I (Patio Covers), and Appendix Chapter J (Grading), as published by the International Code Council, as amended and adopted by the California Building Standards Commission in the California Building Standards Code, Part 2, Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations.

C. The 2022 Edition of the California Residential Building Code, based upon the 2021 International Residential B u i Id i n g Code including, among the Appendices, Appendix Chapter G (Swimming Pools, Spas, and Hot Tubs), Appendix Chapter H (Patio Covers), and Appendix Chapter J (Existing Buildings and Structures), as published by the International Code Council, as amended and adopted by the California Building Standards Commission in the California Building Standards Code, Part 2.5, Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations.

D. The 2020 Edition of the California Electrical Code, based upon the 2020 Edition of the National Electric Code, as published by the National Fire Protection Association, as adopted by the California Building Standards Commission in Part 3, Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations.

E. The 2022 Edition of the California Mechanical Code, based upon the 2021 Uniform Mechanical Code, as published by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials, as adopted by the California Building Standards Commission in Part 4, Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations.

F. The 2022 Edition of the California Plumbing Code, based upon the 2021 Uniform Plumbing Code, as published by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials, as adopted by the California Building Standards Commission in Part 5, Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations.

G. The 2022 Edition of the California Energy Code, as published by the International Code Council, as adopted by the California Building Standards Commission in Part 6, Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations.

H. The 2022 Edition of the California Historical Building Code, as published by the International Code Council, as adopted by the California Building Standards Commission in Part 8, Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations.

I. The 2022 Edition of the California Existing Building Code, as published by the

Ordinance No. 853
February 21, 2023

International Code Council, as amended and adopted by the California Building Standards Commission in the California Building Standards Code in Part 10, Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations.

J. The 2022 Green Building Standards Code, as published by the International Code Council, as adopted by the California Building Standards Commission in Part ll Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations.

K. The 2022 Edition of the California Referenced Standards Code, as published by the International Code Council, as adopted by the California Building Standards Commission in Part 12, Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations.

L. The International Swimming Pool and Spa Code, 2021 Edition, as published by the International Code Council. "
A copy of said codes above is on file in the office of the Building Official for examination and use by the public.

SECTION 4-rnAJYI'ERl. BUILDINGCODE
Section 15.02.025 - of the Anderson Municipal Code is enacted to read:
"As provided for in Section 15.02.020(8), the city adopts Chapter 1 of the 2022 Edition of the California Building Code, based upon the 2022 International Building Code in its entirety." SECTION 5-FIRE CODE
Section 15.20.010 of the Anderson Municipal Code is enacted to read:
"The 2022 Edition of the California Fire Code, based upon the 2022 International Fire Code, as published by the International Code Council, as amended and adopted by the California Building Standards Commission in the California Building Standards Code, Part 9, Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, and the accompanying non-building and administrative regulations, are hereby adopted by reference." A copy of said code is on file in the office of the Building Official for examination and use by the public.

Ordinance No. 853
February 21. 2023

SECTION 6 -SEVERABILITY
The provisions of this ordinance are severable, and the invalidity, unenforceability or unconstitutionality of any section, portion or part of this ordinance shall not affect the validity of the remainder of the ordinance.

SECTION 7 - CEQA
The City Council hereby finds and determines that it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that this ordinance may have a significant adverse effect on the environment, since it adopts updated building and safety standards, which the City had previously adopted in substantial form. Thus, the adoption of this ordinance is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to Section 15061(b) (3) of the CEQA Guidelines.

SECTION 8-EFFECTIVE DATE AND SUMMARY PUBLICATION
This Ordinance shall be published in the Record Searchlight, a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Anderson, in the manner provided by Section 36933 of the Government Code of the State of California, and shall be effective 30 days after its passage.

The foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Anderson on February 7th 2023, and enacted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Anderson held on February 21, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Michael Gallagher, Mayor
ATTEST:

Christy White, City Clerk

AGENDA ITEM
!February 21, 2023, City Council Meetin~
Approved for Submittal By:

To:

From:

Honorable Mayor and Members of the Anderson City Council Jeff Kiser, City Manager
Date: February 21, 2023
!SUBJECT
Shasta County Commission on Aging Representative

J RECOMMENDATION
The City Manager recommends that the City Council:

Appoint Bonnie Simmons to Shasta County Commission on Aging.

I FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact.
! DISCUSSION and BACKGROUND
The Anderson City Council appoints one member to the Shasta County Commission on Aging. The Shasta County Commission on Aging is the official advisory commission to the Shasta County Board of Supervisors and the Area Agency on Aging, Planning and Service Area 2 on matters related to the Board of Supervisors.

It is recommended that the City Council appoint Bonnie Simmons to serve on the Board of the Shasta County Commission on Aging.

ITEM 8.1 PAGE1 2/7/2023

AGENDA ITEM
I Feb. 21, 2023, City Council Meetin~
Approved for Submittal By:

To:

From:

Honorable Mayor and Members of the Anderson City Council Jeff Kiser, City Manager
Date: February 21, 2023
!SUBJECT
Initiative No. 21-0042A-1 Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act

I RECOMMENDATION
Consider adoption of a Resolution opposing Initiative No. 21-0042A1, the Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act.

I FISCAL IMPACT
Fee revenue amount could be put at risk, increased legal defense costs, invalidation of taxes or future reduction of tax revenues, delayed annexations/development.

I DISCUSSION and BACKGROUND
The Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act would amend the California Constitution with provisions that limit voters' authority and input, adopt new and stricter rules for raising taxes and fees, and may make it more difficult to impose fines and penalties for violation of state and local laws.

The measure puts billions of local government tax and fee revenues at risk statewide with related core public service impacts.

ITEM 8.3 PAGE1 2/21/2023
The measure would have significant negative impacts on the City of Anderson operations and core service delivery.

The proposed constitutional initiative is sponsored by the California Business Round table.

Full text of Ballot Initiative
I. MAJOR PROVISIONS
Fees and Chargesl:
• Except for licensing and other regulatory fees, fees and charges may not exceed the "actual cost" of providing the product or service for which the fee is charged. "Actual cost" is the "minimum amount necessary." The burden to prove the fee or charge does not exceed "actual cost" is changed to "clear and convincing" evidence. • Requires fees and charges paid for the use of local and state government property and the amount paid to purchase or rent government property to be "reasonable." These fees and charges are currently allowed to be market-based. Whether the amount is "reasonable" (introducing a new legal standard aiming to force below market fee and charge amounts) must be proved by "clear and convincing evidence."2 The standard may significantly reduce the amount large companies ( e.g., oil, utilities, gas, railroads, garbage/refuse, cable, and other corporations) will pay for the use oflocal public property. • Prohibits fees on new development based on vehicle miles traveled.

Taxes3:
• Taxes and fees adopted after Jan. 1, 2022, that do not comply with the new rules, are void unless reenacted4.
• Invalidates Upland decision that allows a majority of local voters to pass special taxes. The measure specifies that taxes proposed by the initiative are subject to the same rules as taxes placed on the ballot by a city council.
• Expressly prohibits local advisory measures which allow local voters to express a preference for how local general tax dollars should be spent.5 • Requires voter approval to expand existing taxes (e.g., Utility, Transient Occupancy) to new territory (e.g., annexations) or to expand the tax base (e.g., new utility service) • New taxes can only be imposed for a specific time period. • City charters may not be amended to include a tax or fee. • All state taxes require majority voter approval.
1 Initiative No. 21-0042Al (pgs.4-6; Section 1 (a)-U)
2 Initiative No. 21-0042Al (pg.5; (3)) 3 Initiative No. 21-0042Al (pgs.4-6; Section 1 (a)-U) 4 Initiative No. 21-0042Al (pg.7; Section 6 (Sec. 2)(g) s Initiative No. 21-0042Al (pg.6 (3))
ITEM 8.3 PAGE 2 2/21/2023
Fines and Penalties6:

II.
• May require voter approval of fines, penalties, and levies for corporations and property owners that violate state and local laws unless a new, undefined adjudicatory process is used to impose the fines and penalties.

DISCUSSION /ADDITIONAL BACKGROUND
On Jan. 4, 2022, the California Business Roundtable filed the "Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act" or AG# 21-0042Al. On Feb. l, 2023, the measure qualified for the November 2024 ballot.

The League of California Cities, along with a broad coalition of local governments, labor and public safety leaders, infrastructure advocates, and businesses, strongly opposes this initiative.

Local government revenue-raising authority is currently substantially restricted by state statute and constitutional provisions, including the voter approved provisions of Proposition 13 of 1978, Proposition 218 of 1996, and Proposition 26 of 2010. The Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act adds and expands restrictions on voters and local government tax and fee authority.

Fees and Taxes
Local governments levy a variety of fees and other charges to provide core public services.

Major examples of affected fees and charges are:
• Nuisance abatement charges, such as for weed, rubbish, and general nuisance abatement to fund community safety, code enforcement, and neighborhood cleanup programs. • Commercial franchise fees.
• Emergency response fees, such as in connection with DUI. • Advanced Life Support (ALS) transport charges.
• Document processing and duplication fees.
• Transit fees, tolls, parking fees, and public airport and harbor use fees. • Facility use charges, fees for parks and recreation services, garbage disposal tipping fees.

Virtually every city, county, and special district must regularly (e.g., annually) adopt increases to fee rates and charges and revise rate schedules to accommodate new users and activities. Most of these would be subject to new standards and limitations under threat of legal challenge. Based on the current volume of fees and charges imposed by local agencies, including council-adopted increases to simply accommodate inflation, Cal Cities estimates the amount of local government fee and charge revenue at risk is approximately $2 billion per year including those adopted since Jan. 1, 2022. Over ten years, $20 billion of local government fee and charge revenues will be at heightened legal peril.

Examples of the City of Anderson's affected fees and charges include:
6 Initiative No. 21-0042Al (pg. 5 (4))
ITEM 8.3 PAGE3 2/21/2023
Hundreds of local tax measures were approved in 20227 that likely do not comply with the provisions of the initiative. Nearly $2 billion of annual revenues from these voter-approved measures will cease a year after the effective date of the measure, reducing the local public services funded by these measures, unless the tax is re-submitted for voter approval.

Reductions on local government tax revenues have impacts on core services and infrastructure including fire and emergency response, law enforcement, streets and roads, drinking water, sewer sanitation, parks, libraries, public schools, affordable housing, homelessness prevention, and mental health services.

Examples of the City of Anderson's affected revenue measures and service impacts include:

Fines and Penalties
Under existing law, cities are required to provide due process before imposing a penalty or fine for violation of its municipal code:

1. A local agency must adopt administrative procedures that govern imposing fines and penalties, including providing a reasonable period of time for a person responsible for a continuing violation to correct or remedy the violation [Gov't Code 53069.4].

2. Notice must be given to the violating party before imposing the penalty; and give the party an opportunity to be heard and present any facts or arguments [Merco Construction Engineers v. Los Angeles Unified School District (1969) 27 4 CA 2d 154, 166].

3. The fine may not be "excessive" [U.S. Constitution amendments VIII and XIV].

The initiative converts administratively-imposed fines and penalties into taxes unless a new, undefined, and ambiguous "adjudicatory due process" is followed. This provision may put at risk authority to impose fines and penalties for violations of state and local law. !ATTACHMENT

1. Resolution
7 http://www.californiacityfinance.com/Votes2211final.pdf ITEM 8.3 PAGE4 2/21/2023
RESOLUTION NO. 23-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANDERSON
OPPOSING INITIATIVE 21-0042A1
WHEREAS, an association representing California's wealthiest corporations and developers is spending millions to push a deceptive proposition aimed for the November 2024 statewide ballot; and
WHEREAS, the measure includes undemocratic provisions that would make it more difficult for local voters to pass measures needed to fund local services and infrastructure, and would limit voter input by prohibiting local advisory measures where voters provide direction on how they want their local tax dollars spent; and WHEREAS, the measure creates new constitutional loopholes that allow corporations to pay far less than their fair share for the impacts they have on our communities, including local infrastructure and our environment; and
WHEREAS, the measure may make it much more difficult for state and local regulators to issue fines and levies on corporations that violate laws intended to protect our environment, public health and safety, and our neighborhoods; and WHEREAS, the measure puts billions of dollars currently dedicated to local services at risk and could force cuts to fire and emergency response, law enforcement, public health, parks, libraries, affordable housing, services to support homeless residents, mental health services, and more; and
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Anderson opposes Initiative 21-0042Al; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City of Anderson will join the No on Initiative 21- 0042A1 coalition, a growing coalition of public safety, education, labor, local government, and infrastructure groups throughout the state.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Anderson this 21st day February 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Mike Gallagher, Mayor of the City of Anderson
ATTEST:

Christy White, City Clerk

LEAGUE OF

CALIFORNIA
CITIES
The Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act Initiative No. 21-0042A 11
Feb. 1, 2023
Effective date: Any new or increased tax or fee adopted by the Legislature, a city council, or the local voters after January 1, 2022, must comply with the Act's new rules.

Voters
• Local advisory measures are prohibited. No measure may appear on the ballot asking for approval of a general tax that would allow the voters to express a preference for how the revenue from the general tax will, could, or should be used.
• Overturns Upland decision which upheld a special tax that had been placed on the ballot by the voters to be approved by a majority vote. Taxes proposed by initiative will be subject to the same rules as taxes placed on the ballot by a city council.
• Voters may not amend a city charter to impose, extend, or increase a tax or fee.

Local taxes
• Requires voter approval in order to apply an existing tax:
o to territory that is annexed.
o to a new seNice or product, for example when a utility user tax is applied to a new seNice.
• All new or increased taxes adopted after Jan. 1, 2022, must include a sunset date.

State taxes
• All new or increased state taxes require statewide voter approval. • Prohibits a property tax "surcharge•t (increase). Prohibits any allocation of property tax to the state.
1 This is a summary of some of the more significant provisions of the Act. Please review the Act for a complete understanding of the changes it makes to the Constitution.

LEAGUE OF

CALIFORNIA
CITIES
Fees and charges
• Fees and charges for services and permits may not exceed the "actual cost" of providing the product or service for which the fee is charged. "Actual cost" is the "minimum amount necessary." Examples include planning services, excavation and encroachment permits, preparation of candidate statement, and permit parking.
• State and cities have the burden of proving by "clear and convincing evidence" that a fee/charge is not a tax, that the amount is reasonable, and that it does not exceed "actual cost."
• Franchise fees - historically considered fees, not taxes - will more likely be considered taxes due to the elimination of an existing category of "fee" and the requirement that charges to entrance, purchase, rental, or lease of government property be "reasonable.'' The state and cities issue franchises to oil companies, utilities, gas companies, railroads, garbage companies, cable companies, and other corporations.
• No fee or charge or exaction regulating vehicle miles traveled can be imposed as a condition of property development or occupancy.

Fines and penaltles (administrative enforcement of state law and municipal codes)
• May require voter approval of fines and penalties for corporations and property owners that violate state and local laws unless a new, undefined adjudicatory process is used to impose the fines and penalties. Examples include nuisance abatement, organic waste reduction requirements, and failure to maintain a vacant property.
2 Rev. January 14, 2023
Fiscal and Program Effects of
Initiative 21-0042A 1 on Local Governments
If Initiative 21-0042A 1 is placed on the ballot and passed by voters, it will result in:
• Over $20 billion of local government fee and charge revenues over 10 years placed at heightened legal peril. Related public service reductions across virtually every aspect of city, county, special district, and school services especially for drinking water, sewer sanitation, and public health and safety. • About $2 billion of revenues each year from fees and charges adopted after January 1, 2021 subject to legal peril.1
• Over $2 billion dollars of annual revenues from dozens of tax measures approved by voters between January 1, 2022 and the effective date of the act2 subject to additional voter approval if not in compliance with the initiative.
• Indeterminable legal and administrative burdens and costs on local government from new and more empowered legal challenges, and bureaucratic cost tracking requirements. • The delay and deterrence of municipal annexations.
• Substantially higher legal and administrative cost of public infrastructure financing which will delay and deter new residential and commercial development.
• Service and infrastructure declines including in fire and emergency response, law enforcement, public health, drinking water, sewer sanitation, parks, libraries, public schools, affordable housing, homelessness prevention and mental health services.

1. Local Government Taxes and Services Threatened
With regard to taxes, Initiative 21-0042A1:
• Prohibits advisory, non-binding measures as to use of tax proceeds on the same ballot. o Voters may be less informed and more likely to vote against measures. • Eliminates the ability of special tax measures proposed by citizen initiative to be enacted by majority voter approval ( Upland). 3
o Because the case law regarding citizen initiative special taxes approved by majority vote (Upland) is so recent, it is unknown how common these sorts of measures might be in the future. This inittative would prohibit such measures after the effective date of the initiative. Any such measures adopted after January 1, 2022 through the effective date of the Act should it pass would be void a year after the effective date of the initiative. • Requires that tax measures include a specific duration of time that the tax will be imposed. This seems to require that all tax increases or extensions contain a sunset (end date). o This would require additional tax measures to extend previously approved taxes. • A city charter may not be amended to impose, extend, or increase a tax might interfere with the ability of cities that do not already have such authority in their charters to adopt Property Transfer Taxes. o There are no more than a few of these every few years. but it is a valuable tax for those that adopt it.
1 Assumes fee increases since January 1, 2022 would be subject to possible legal challenge if not adopted in compliance with the Initiative.
2 The effective date of the initiative would be sometime in December 2024, the date the California Secretary of State certifies the election results o f the NO\·embcr 5, 2024 election. 3 Unlike the initiative 17-0050, this initiative does not eliminate that ability of cities and counties to adopt general taxes by majorit}' voter approval.
2217 Isle Royale Lane • Davis , CA• 95616-6616
Phone · 530.758 3952 • Fax 530.758.3952
-2- rev January 14, 2023
• Requires that a tax measure adopted after January 1, 2022 and before the effective date of the initiative that was not adopted in accordance with the measure be readopted in compliance with the measure or will be void twelve months after the effective date of the initiative. o If past election patterns and elections in 2022 are an indication, over 200 tax measures approving more than $2 billion annual revenues to support local public services would not be in compliance and would be subject to reenactment. Most will be taxes without a specific end date and special taxes (including parcel taxes). Because there is no regularly scheduled election within the 12 months following the effective date of the initiative, the measures would each require declaratfon of emergency and unanimous vote of the governing board to be placed on a special election ballot within a year for approval or the tax will be void after that date. I would expect most to succeed, but some will not. in particular citizen initiative majority vote special taxes which would have to meet a higher voter approval threshold to continue. • Requires voter approval to expand an existing tax to new territory (annexations). This would require additional tax measures and would deter annexations and land development in cities. o If a tax is "extended" to an annexed area without a vote after January 1, 2022, it will be void 12 months later until brought into compliance. Because there is no regularly scheduled election within the 12 months following the effective date of the initiative, such extensions would each require unanimous vote of the agency board to be placed on a special election ballot or would be void a year later.

1.a. Number of Measures and Value of Local Taxes at Risk" Over a hundred local measures were approved in 2022 that likely do not comply with the provisions of Initiative 21-0042A1. Nearly $2 billion of annual revenues from these voter approved measures will cease a year after the effective date of the measure, reducing the local public services funded by these measures. We can expect a similar volume of measures in 2024 and a similar volume of non-compliance. So the combined total of annual local funding directly affected by lnitiat•ve 21-0042A1 due to its retroactivity provision is about $4 billion.

Citizen Initiative Special Taxes in 2022.

Special taxes placed on the ballot by citizen initiative and approved after January 1, 2022 by a majority but less than two-thirds of the voters are out of compliance with Initiative 21-0042A 1.

On June 7, 2022, there were three local specia, tax measures placed on the ballot by citizen initiative. Two failed to get majority voter approval. A one percent transactions and use tax (sales tax) for the John C. Fremont Healthcare District in Mariposa County received 69.6 percent approval, over the two thirds needed for any special tax under Californta Constitution Article XIIIC. So this measure was passed in compliance with Initiative 21- 0042A1.

June 2022 Initiative Special Taxes - majority voter approval Estimated
Agencll Name Counfy Tax/Fee Rate Annual Revenue Use Sunset YES0 .4
John C Fremont Maripo~a Measure N Transactions l cent $150.000 hospital 40yrs 69.6% PASS Healthcare District & Use Tax County ofKlllgs Kin~s Measure F Transactions 1/2 cent $11,700,000 fire 37.6% FAIL & Use Tax none l\lanhattan Beach Lo s Angeles Measure A School Parcel $1095/yr $ 12.000.000 schools 12yrs Jl.2% FAIL USD Tax On November 8, 2022, there were 14 local special taxes placed on the ballot by citizen initiative. Seven of these 4 Source: Compilaaon and summarr of data from County elections offices.

CatifomiaCityFi111.o.111.ce.coW\
-3- rev January 14, 2023
measures failed with less than majority voter approval. The other seven measures received majority, but less than two-thirds, voter approval. These measures passed under current law but are out of compliance with Initiative 21- 0042A1. Taken together these seven taxes will provide estimated annual revenues of from $900,000 to $1.4 billion in support of parks and recreation, zoo, library, affordable housing, transportation, homelessness prevention. and schools in these communities.

November 2022 Initiative Special Taxes - majority voter approval Estimated
Agenc}l Name County Tax/Fee Rate Annual Revenue Use Sunset YES% Crockett Co~nity Contra Costa Measure L
Services DJStnct Parcel Tax $S0Jparcel $60,000 parks/recr none 62.8% PASS Oakland Alalll!da Measure Y Parcel Tax $68/parcel $12,000,000 ZIJO 2~rs 62.5% PASS Counly of Mendocino Measure 0 Transactions 1/8 cent then lf4 $4,000.000 hbral) 60.8% PASS & Use Tax cent m 2027 none Los Angeles Los Angeles Measure ULA Propeny 4% if >$5m, 5.5% $600mto $1 I b affordable S7J% PASS Transfer Tax if>$10m housing none
County of Sacramento Measure A Transactions s alll! 1!2 cent $ 212.512.500 40rrs SSJ% PASS & Use Tax transporta11 San Francisco Pro osition M Business $2SOO-Ss_ooo1 _ p Operauons Tax vacant res1d unit $ 20.000.000 housmg 30yrs s4.s% PASS schools,
Los Angeles Measure GS Property $56/$ J 000 If
$ 50.000,000 homelessne Santa Monica 53.3% PASS Transfer Tax >$8m ss, afford. none housing
Total $900,000 to
$1.4 billion
Estimated
Agenc}l Name Count)' Tax/Fee Rate Annual Revenue Use Sunset YES% County of Calaveras Measure A Transactions I cent $ 5,000,000 fire 49.4% FAIL & Use Tax none South San Francis co San Mateo Measure DD School Parcel $2 50lsf $ 55.900,000 schools 472% FAIL (for Schools) Tax none County of Fresno (for CSU) Measure E
T ransactions l/5 ct. $36,000,000 Calif State 20yrs 46.9% FAIL & Use Tax 1/40 ct {Reedley} Umv Santa Cruz Santa Cruz Measure N Parcel Tax $6klvacant SFU vacant :xx:< XX'( 442% FAIL ro ert • County ofMo nterey Measure Q Parcel Tax $49Jparcel $ 5.500,000 childcare IOyrs 411% FAIL San FrancJSco City San Measure 0 School Parcel $1 50l'sfu $ 3 7.000,000 schools JOyrs 36.7% FAIL College f ranCJSCO Tax Morro Bay
San Luis Measure B Parcel Tax $12o+fparcel $680,000 harbor 36.0% FAIL Obispo none Inverness Public Marm Measure 0 Parcel Tax $0.20Js f.. $276.000 fire 21.0% FAIL Utility Distnct $150/vacant none Non-Specific Tax Durations in 2022
Voters approved 106 measures in June 2022 (10) and November 2022 (96) that do not provide a specific duration of time that the tax wfll be imposed (end date). Typically, the ballot titles for these measures state that the tax would be imposed ·until ended by voters.· Four of these measures also did not include any estimate of the annual revenues that the tax would generate, another violation of initiative 21-0042A 1. Taken together, these approved local measures generate $561 million per year that will expire a year after the effective date of the initiative if Initiative 21-0042A 1 passes.

CalifomiaCityFi111.ar1.ce.coM
-4- rev January 14, 2023
Measures in 2022 with Non-Specific Durations
Annual
Agenclr'. Name County Tax/Fee Rate Revenue Use Sunset YES% Oakland Alameda Measure T Business Tax various $20,900,000 71,4% PASS _General none ~--- ----- Culver City Los Angeles Measure BL Business Tax S I0.000,000 60.5% PASS General ,·anons none El Segundo Los Angeles Measure BT Business Tax $ 3.000.000 51.2% PASS General various none Pico Rivera Los Angeles M AB Busmess Tax eas ure General various S 5.800,000 none 75.5% PASS Santa Ana Orange Measure W Business Tax various neutral none 64.8% PASS General Tracy San Joaquin Measure B Business Tax S 3,200,000 72.6% PASS General various none Burlmgamc San Mateo Measure X Business Tax $2,500.000 7S.1 % PASS General various none Los Gatos Santa Clara Measure J Business Tax $ l.100,000 SJ.4% PASS General various none Santa Clara Santa Clara Measure H Business Tax $45lell1)1oyee, $6.000,000 59.5% PASS General SIS/rental unit none Brisbane San Mateo MeasureO Bus mess Tax $2.50fm1'da)' $250,000 69.2% PASS lod in busn none East Palo Alto San Mateo Measure L Business Tax 25% S 1,480.000 69.9% PASS resid. rentals grossRcpts none ----- County ofSanta Cruz Unincorporated Measure C Busn Tax- 12.5centslcup $700,000 68.2% PASS dis p cups none ------ - South Lake Tahoe El Dorado MeasureG Busn Tax 6% retail. S 950.000 62.9% PASS Cannabis 1renu facturinz none McFarland Kem MeasureO Busn Tax 8%ofgross S 1.800.000 none 63.5% PASS Cannabis receipts retail.

Avenal Kings MeasureC Busn Tax $25+/sfor $600,000 61.8% PASS Cannabis 15% 1tr rcrts none Baldwin Park Los Angeles Measure CB Busn Tax 4% $300,000 S1.J% PASS Cannabis i rossRcpts none Clarenxrnt Los Angeles Measure CT Busn Tax 4o/o-7% gr S 500,000 61.1% PASS Cannabis rc~ts, SI- none Count} of Los Angeles Unmcorporated Measure C Busn Tax 4% gross S 15.170.000 60.1 % PASS Cannabis receiets retail. none Cudahy Los Angeles Measure BA Busn Tax 15% $3,600,000 54.0o/o PASS Cannabis grossRce ts none BSegundo Los Angeles Measure Y Busn Tax IOO;i, $ 1.500.000 72.So/o PASS Cannabis GrossRc,,et. none Henrosa Beach Los Angeles Measure T Busn Tax 100/o $ 1.500.000 67.6o/o PASS Cannabis GrossRc[!I, none Lynwood Los Angeles Measure TR Busn Tax 5%tol0% S 3,000.000 none 66.4% PASS Cannabis Santa Monica Los Angeles Measure HM Busn Tax 100/o gross S 5,000,000 66.40/o PASS Cannabis Re ts none South El Monte Los Angeles Measure CM Busn Tax 6% special $126,000 SJ.7% PASS Cannabis e~isetaxon none Monterey Monterey Measure J Busn Tax 6%grossRcpt S 1,300.000 65.2% PASS Cannabis none Pacific Grove Monterey Measure N Busn Tax 6% gross Rcpt S 300.000 70.8% PASS Cannabis none Huntington Beach Orange Measure 0 Busn Tax 6% retail. 1% $600.000 54.7% PASS Cannabis other none Ca(iforniaCityFinance.coM
-5- rev January 14, 2023
Measures in 2022 with Non-Specific Durations
Annual
Agencir: Name County Tax/Fee Rate Revenue Use Sunset YES0 k
Laguna Woods Orange Measure T Busn Tax 4%-100/o of $750.000 61.1% PASS Cannabis &ross reCC!J?.IS none Corona Ri\erside Measure G Busn Tax 9%ofgross $5,000.000 61.6% PASS Cannabis receil!IS for none Montclair San Bernardino Measure R Busn Tax 7o/o S 3.500,000 70.3% PASS Cannabis none 1!:IDSSRci!IS County of San Diego Unincorporaled Measure A Busn Tax 6%retail.3% $5.600,000 57.4% PASS Cannabis dLStribution, none Encmi1as San Diego Measure L Busn Tax 4% to7%of S 1.400,000 65.1% PASS Cannabis uoss recei£1s none Healdsburg Sonoma Measure M Busn Tax 8% grossRcpl $500.000 72.7% PASS Cannabis none Exeler Tulare Measure B Busn Tax 10% retail and
? 66.5% PASS Cannabis other,$ IOJs f none
Tulare Tulare Measure Y Busn Tax IOOA, retafl and '.' 65.2% PASS other, SIOlsf none Cannabis Woodland Yolo Measure K Busn Tax 10% '.' 66.2% PASS Cannabis none l!fO s s Reels Redlands San Bernardino Measure J Busn Tax from S0.047/sf S 530.000 53.5% PASS Distrib cenlers 10 $0.105/sf none Arcadia Los Angeles Busn Tax 5% Measure SW S n/a• 63.9% PASS 8 , none (!Oris e11m11: l!l'OSSRC(!!S Albany Alameda Measure K ParcelTax $0.074+1sf $1.950,000 fireJEMS none 76.0% PASS Cameron Park AIJJ)ort El Dorado Measure J ParcelTax by $600to S 11 7.900 airport/ none 78.2% PASS Dislrict $900/'l!arcel slreets Highlands.Village El Dorado Measure L ParcelTax $14o+/parcel $ I0,920 streets none 86.3% PASS Lighting Benefil Zone Knolls Property El Dorado Measure P ParcelTax br$3oo+to $8,400 streets none 1s.s% PASS OwnersCSD $600+/earcel Sundance Trail Zone of El Dorado
Benefit MeasureC ParcelTax $600+/yr $24.000 roads none 73.2% PASS South Pasadena Los Angeles Measure LL ParcelTax XXX '.' libraiy none 86.2% PASS River Delta Fire District Sacramento Measure H ParcelTax $90.') r S 130,000 fire none 12.1% PASS Emeryville Alam:da MeasureO PropTransITax $15!$1000 If $5.000.000 71.6% PASS Slm-S2m none San Mateo San Mateo Measure CC PropTransITax b) I o/o to 1.5% $4.800,000 none 71.8% PASS if>SIOm Alan~da Alameda Measure F TOT by4% to 14% $910.000 none 59.2% PASS Clovis Fresno Measure B TOT by 2% to 12"/o $500.000 none 69.7% PASS Kerman Fresno MeasureG TOT 10% $40.000 none 62.Jo/o PASS Trinidad Huoooldt Measure P TOT by 4%10 12% $65,000 none 77 .6% PASS llll)erial Imperial MeasureG TOT by 4%to 12% $600.000 none 56.2% PASS Arcadia Los Angeles Measure HT TOT by 2% to 12"/o $ 730.000 none 54.1% PASS Santa Monica Los Angeles Measure CS TOT by 1%, 3% $4.100,000 none 73.7% PASS home shares ~
?= Ballot measure title did not include an estimate of annual revenues, also not in compliance ,\ith Initiative 21-0042At. n/ a*= Arcadia Measure S\X! passed but sports betting remains illegal after the failure of Propositions 26 and 27 on the November statewide ballot.

Cal ifo l"V\i a Cit!:) FiV\ance.co W\
-6- rev January 14, 2023
Measures in 2022 with Non-Specific Durations
Annual
Agenclr'. Name County Tax/Fee Rate Revenue Use Sunset YES% Anaheim Orange Measure J TOT online travel $3,000,000 59.2% PASS anies none co La Pahm Orange Measure P TOT b) 4% to 12o/o $ 200.000 none 71.1% PASS Colfax Placer Measure B TOT by 2% to I 0"11> $29,000 none 73.5% PASS Rocklin Placer Measure F TOT by 2% to IO% $300,000 none 59.8% PASS Roseville Placer Measure C TOT b) 4% to IO% S 3,000,000 none 73.0% PASS Big Bear Lake San Bemardmo Measure P TOT by 2% to 10% $1.300.000 none 54.4% PASS Grand Terrace San Bemardmo Measure M TOT ne\\ 10% $ 250.000 none 51.9% PASS Yucca Valley San Bernardino Measure K TOT br 5% to 12% S 1,300,000 none 71.9% PASS 1111)erial Beach San Diego Measure R TOT by 4% to 14% $400,000 none 67.4% PASS B Paso de Robles San Luis Obis pc Measure F TOT by 1% to 11% $750,000 none 61.2% PASS Bebmnt San Mateo Measure K TOT by2% to 14% $600,000 none 79.3% PASS Millbrae San Mateo MeasureN TOT by2% to 14% $ 1.500.000 none 75.8% PASS County ofHuni,oldt Unincorporated Measure J TOT by2% to 12% S 3,080.000 none 63.3% PASS County of Placer- Measure A TOT by 2% to 100/o $4,000.000 none 90.0% PASS Nonh ~ T Are_a _ County of Santa Cruz Un incorporated Measure B TOT by 1% to 12% S 2,300,000 none 69.2% PASS County of El Dorado - Measure S TOT2/3 by4% to 14% $2,500.000 none 81.8% PASS East Slo . e Tahoe Chico Butte Measure H TrUT I cent $ 24.000,000 none 52.4% PASS Mendota Fresno Measure H TrUT 1.25 cent $493,498 none 57.2% PASS Blue Lake Huni,oldt Measure R TrUT I cent $30.000 none 55.4% PASS Rio Dell Huni,oldt Measure 0 TrUT 3J4cent $400.000 none 53.3% PASS County of Kem unincorporated areas Measure K TrUT I cent $54,000,000 none so.so;. PASS l\lcfarland Kem Measure M TrUT I cent $579,662 none 62.2% PASS Tehachapi Kem Measure S TrUT I cent $4.000.000 none 57.2% PASS Avenal Kings Measure A TrUT I cent $ 500.000 none 72.5% PASS Susanville Lassen Measure P TrUT I cent S 1.750.000 none 54.7% PASS Baldwin Park Los Angeles Measure BP TrUT 3/4 cent $6,000,000 none ss.t% PASS Malibu Los Angeles Measure MC TrUT 1/2 cent $3,000,000 none 52.6% PASS Monterey Park Los Angeles Measure MP TrUT 3/4 cent $6.000.000 none 58.5% PASS Torrance Los Angeles Measure SSl TrUT 1/2 cent $ 18,000.000 none SS.0% PASS Larkspur Marin MeasureG TrUT 1/4 cent $700,000 none S9.4% PASS Sand City Monterey Measure L TrUT by l/2cent to $ 1.400,000 none 68.7% PASS I.Scents
Hemet Riverside Measure H TrUT same I cent S 15,000.000 none 58.0% PASS ElkQove Sacramento Measure E TrUT I cent $ 21,000.000 none 54.1% PASS Galt Sacramento MeasureQ TrUT l cent $3,600,000 none 52.4% PASS Colton San Bernardino Measure S TrUT I cent $9.500.000 none 66.8% PASS Ontario San B.:mardmo Measure Q TrUT I cent $ 95,000.000 none SJ.2% PASS Solana Beach San Diego Measure S TrUT I cent $ 3.000,000 none 66.7% PASS Brisbane San Mateo Measure U TrUT l/2 cent S 2.000.000 none 63.9% PASS Goleta Santa Barbara Measure B TrUT I cent S 10.600.000 none 64.7% PASS Solvang Santa Barbara Measure U TrUT I cent $1,600,000 none 6J.t% PASS Califomio.CityFi111.a111.ce.coM
-7- rev January 14, 2023
Measures in 2022 with Non-Specific Durations
Annual
Agencl Name County Tax/Fee Rate Revenue Use Sunset YES% Watsonville Santa Cruz Measure R TrlJf 1/2 cent $5,000,000 none 64.4% PASS Vallejo Solano Measure P TrlJf 7/8 cent $ 18,000,000 none S4.7% PASS Modesto Stanislaus Measure H TrlIT I cent S 39,000,000 none 62.so;. PASS Count}' of Colusa Measure A TrlIT 2/3 1/2 cent $2,400,000 EMS none 69.4% PASS Atwater Merced Measure B TrlIT 2/3 same I cent $4,000.000 police/fire none 73.7% PASS Truckee Nevada Measure U TrUT 2/3 by 1/4 cent to
l/2cent $3,000,000 open space none 76.4% PASS / trails
Palo Alto Santa Clara Measure L UtilityTrans fer 18°/o gas $7,000.000 none 77.7% PASS Santa Clara Santa Clara MeasureG UtilityTrans fer 5% $ 30,000,000 none SU% PASS Hercules Contra Cos ta Measure N UlJf 8% $3,600.000 none 69.3% PASS Carson Los Angeles Measure UU UlJf 2% electr, gas $8,000,000 none 78.4% PASS Sebastopol Sonoma Measure N uur 3.75% (same) $700,000 none 83.5% PASS Co-temporal Advisory Measures in 2022
At the November 2022 election, there was just one local general tax measure that was accompanied by an advisory measure as to the use of funds. The City of Santa Monica's Measure DT property transfer tax failed with just 34 percent approval as voters instead chose the citizen initiative Measure GS.

There was also just one such tax use advisory measure on the June 2022 election. Susanville's voters passed Measure P, a 1 percent transactions and use (sales) tax that generates $1.75 million per year5 for general city services. The measure was accompanied by advisory Measure Q, accompanied the city's It asked, "If Measure P passes. should the revenues be used to balance the budget to maintain and enhance existing public safety services (police and fire), and provide funding to support street infrastructure improvements and provide funding to support economic development efforts designed to increase businesses, jobs and visitors to Susanville?" Both measures passed. Under Initiative 21-0042A 1, the tax will expire a year after the effective date of the initiative (i.e., in December 2025).

1.b. Additional Costs and Public Service Effects of the Tax Provisions Assuming a similar volume of local measures through 2024 as we saw in 2022, there will be over 200 local measures that will need to be redrafted to comply with the Initiative and placed back on the ballot for the taxes to continue after December 2025. The costs of re-drafting, re-placfng and re-voting on these measures, previously legally approved by voters, will be in the tens of millions in total statewide.

2. "Exempt Charges" (fees and charges that are not taxes} and Services Threatened With regard to fees and charges adopted after January 1, 2022, lnitiattve 21-0042A1:
• Subjects new fees and charges for a product or service to a new ~actual and reasonable test." • Subjects fees and charges for entrance to local government property; and rental and sale of local government property to a new, undefined, 8reasonable" test. • Allows legal challenge to any tax adopted before the effective date of the initiative and after January 1, S The Susand lle measure also did not include a specific end date and so is included in the list and totals of those measures.

Co.lifornio.Cit!;jFino.nce.coM
-8- rev January 14, 2023
2022. Such a lawsuit could enjoin (stop) the enactment of the tax pending the outcome of the legal challenge.
• Subjects a challenged fee to new, higher burdens of proof if legally challenged.

2.a. Value on New Local Government Fees and Charges at Risk6 Virtually every city, county, and special district must regularly (e.g., annually) adopt increases to fee rates and charges and revise rate schedules to accommodate new users and activities. Most of these would be subject to new standards and limitations under threat of legal challenge. Based on the current volume of fees and charges imposed by local agencies and increases in those fees simply to accommodate inflation, the amount of local government fee and charge revenue placed at risk is about $2 billion per year including those adopted since January 1, 2022. Of $2 billion, about $900 million (45 percent) is for special districts, $800 million (40 percent) is cities, and $300 million (15 percent) is counties.7 Major examples of affected fees and charges are:

1. Certain water, sanitary sewer, wastewater, garbage, electric, gas service fees.

2. Nuisance abatement charges - such as for weed, rubbish and general nuisance abatement to fund community safety, code enforcement, and neighborhood cleanup programs.

3. Emergency response fees - such as in connection with DUI.

4. Advanced Life Support (ALS) transport charges.

5. Business improvement district charges.

6. Fees for processing of land use and development applications such as plan check fees, use permits, design review, environmental assessment, plan amendment. subdivision map changes.

7. Document processing and duplication fees.

8. Facility use charges, parking fees, tolls.

9. Fines, penalties.

10. Fees for parks and recreation services.

2.b. Additional Costs and Public Service Effects of the Fee/Charge Provisions In addition to service delays and disruptions due to fee and charge revenues placed at greater legal risk, there would be substantial additionat costs for legal defense. The risk to fees and charges will make infrastructure financing more difficult and will deter new residential and commercial development. ***********
'' Source: California State Controller Annual Reports of Financial Transactions concerning cities, counties and special districts, summarized with an assumed growth due to fee rate increases (not population) of 2 percent annually. , School fees arc also affected but the amount is negligible hr comparison.

Californio.CityFiV1.aV1.ce.coW\

AGENDA ITEM
February 21, 2023 City Council Meeting
ttrell, Assistant City Manager Finance
Director /Treasurer
To:

Through:

Honorable Mayor and Members of the Anderson City Council Jeff Kiser, City Manager
From:

Date:
!SUBJECT
Liz Cottrell, Assistant City Manager /Finance Director /Treasurer February 21, 2023
2022-2023 Budget Update

I RECOMMENDATION
The Assistant City Manager /Finance Director recommends that the City Council:

No action is requested at time as this is informational only.

I FISCAL IMPACT
This report is informational only.

I DISCUSSION and BACKGROUND
We are two-thirds of way through the 2022-2023 budget. Staff would like to take this time to review how revenues and expenditures are performing at this point through the year.

Revenue and expenditure numbers are recorded through January for the general fund because we receive our first installment of property tax in January so this is approximately 58% of the budget year. Generally, when we discuss General Fund Revenues, we discuss the top 3 categories which are Sales Tax, Property Tax, and Transient Occupancy Tax.

These three (3) categories make up about 81% of our General Fund Revenues. Below, is a ITEM 8.5 PAGE 1 2/21/2023
table comparing budgeted general fund revenues to actual receipts for the top three (3) revenues through January 2023. Additionally, we have added information from the sametime frame in January 2022 as a comparison.

General Fund Revenues
Revenue
Property Tax
Sales Tax
Transaction & Use Tax
Transient Occupancy
Tax
All otherGF Revenue
Total GF Revenue
F!SCALVEAR
2022 -2023
Budllet
2,200,000.00
4,075,000.00
2,000,000.00
682,500.00
1,593,785.00
10,551,185.00
Receipts to Date
1,437,874.00
1,778,924.00
877,275.00
249,728.00
764,025.00
5,107,826.00
% Revenue
65% Property Tax
44% Sales Tax
44% Transaction & Use Tax
Transient Occupancy
37% Tax
48% All other GF Revenue
48% Total GF Revenue

FISCAL YEAR
2021-2022
Budllet
2,050,000.00
3,250,000.00
1,636,000.00
650,000.00
1,766,256.00
9,352,256.00
Receipts to Date %
1,345,862.00 66%
1,663,507.00 51%
856,867.00 52%
455,633.00 70%
541,775.00 31%
4,863,644.00 52%
At this time revenues are being received as expected. Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) is lower than expected due to one hotel being late in submitting their TOT payment, Property Tax is on track as predicted. We receive Property Tax payments in slightly un-even payments with the bulk received in January and the final bulk payment in May. Sales Tax and Transaction and Use Tax slightly lower than expected. Two main factors that could have an effect on revenues going forward are higher inflation and increased interest rates.

Housing has slowed in the City of Anderson likely due to the above-mentioned factors.

General Fund Expenditures
Total general fund expenditures for 2022-2023 were originally budgeted at$ 11,426,021 with actual expenditures through January 2023 (again which is 58% of the budget year) coming in at $6,399,035 or approximately 57%.

Expenditures are on track at this point in time. Supply chain issues and higher inflation has been a concern; however, staff is very diligent in researching pricing for needed supplies which is reflective of expenditures remaining on target.

Staffing continues to be a challenge across the City. While the positions are budgeted, they remain unfilled. Tasks are being covered either by a consultant at this time or current staff is doing more than one job. For example, as Council may recall at the Council Meeting of February 7, 2023 Council adjusted the salary range to attract applicants for the Director of Operations and Administration position.

After meeting with our Sales Tax Consultant earlier this month HdL, they provided information from Beacon economist Chris Thornberg, in which he states a recession is unlikely in 2023 which is good news.

General Fund Reserve
General Fund reserves as budgeted are projected to increase by $396,725 should revenues and expenditures remain as budgeted. As always, staff continually monitors both revenues and expenditures for needed adjustments. We are finishing up our audit for 2021-2022 and ITEM 8.5 PAGE2 2/21/2023
the expected increase to the General Fund Reserve in 2021-2022 is approximately $350,397 for a total of $3,475,659 which is 33% of expenditures. This is above the Council resolution of 20%-25%.

Water and Sewer Revenues
Revenue
Water
Sewer
Total Enterprise
Revenue

FISCAL VEAR
2022-2023
Budaet
1,776,277.00
1,909,173.00
3,685,450.00
Recelots to Date
840,513.00
788,695.00
1,629,208.00
%

47.3%

41.3%
44%

FISCAL VEAR
Z.l!Z.l·Z.l!Z.Z.

Revenue Budaet Recelots to Date %
Water 1,625,211.00 910,043.00 56.0%
Sewer 1,887,898.00 800,786.00 42.4%
Total Enterprise
Revenue 3,513,109.00 1,710,829.00 49%
The Water Revenue is down approximately 9% from the previous year. This decline is directly related to reduced consumption for the same time frame. In 2022-2023 water consumption declined by 6,057,728 cubic feet. Conservation requests and requirements result in reduced revenue to the City. Sewer Fund revenues are coming in as projected.

Sewer revenues are collected with resident's property tax bill so the City receives this revenue in January and May. State mandates, such as, water conservation measures, drought restrictions continue to challenge city revenues and expenditures in the two funds.

The State of California routinely enacts legislation requiring local governments to implement regulations without necessary funding to finance the regulations. Staff is diligent in balancing the need to maintain the infrastructure while also managing the costs.

Wherever possible staff is researching grants that can be used to enhance our financing.

Water fund expenditures are budgeted at $1,737,412 and are at 57% or $930,018.00.

Sewer fund expenditures are budgeted at $1,966,976 and are at 59% or $1,180,388.78.

Gas Tax Funds and Other funds
State and local gas tax revenues and expenditures are coming in at $552,964 or 45% and expenditures are at$ 1,223,468 or 66%. All other funds of the City are performing as expected at this point in the fiscal year.

Potential Economic Factors/Trends:

The following economic factors may have a significant effect on the National and Local economies. Staff is actively monitoring these issues for their possible effect on City operations:

Staffing and recruitment
SullJ}IY Chain issues
Fuels Costs
Inflation . and Interest Rates
Reduction in Single Family Home Sales
Unfunded reguirementsfrom L®islative Pro.p 1383, drought restrictions and new requirements to bl!JI zero emission vehicles in the heazy- dutyfleet ITEM 8.5 PAGE3 2/21/2023