Anderson City Council
April 15, 2025

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
April 15, 2025
REGULAR SESSION - 5:30 P.M.

CLOSED SESSION FOLLOWING

ANDERSON CITY HALL
1887 Howard Street

PARTICIPATION BY PUBLIC IN MEETING
Please review the Agenda to determine if the subject you wish to discuss is scheduled for Council consideration. If it is on the Agenda, you will have an opportunity when that matter comes up for discussion to briefly address the Council.

If the subject is not on tonight's Agenda, please complete an Agenda Request Form (on Clerk's table) and present it to the City Council Clerk. You will have the opportunity to speak on the subject under Item 5.2. However, if the item is not on the Agenda, each speaker will be limited to one three (3) minute opportunity to speak, unless the City Council makes an exception due to special circumstances.

The Brown Act prohibits the Council from taking action on any item not placed on the printed Agenda in most cases.

The Brown Act requires any non-confidential documents or writings distributed to a majority of the City Council less than 72 hours before a regular meeting will be made available to members of the public at the same time they are distributed.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City of Anderson will make available to members of the public any special assistance necessary to participate in this meeting. The public should contact the City Clerk's office (378-6646) to make such a request. Notification 72 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting.

This is an Equal Opportunity Program. Discrimination is prohibited by Federal Law.

Complaints of discrimination may be filed with the Secretary of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. 20250.

City Council Meeting
April 15, 2025
Page2

1.0 ROLL CALL - COUNCIL:

REGULAR SESSION - 5:30 P.M.

Councilmember Simmons
Councilmember Gallagher
Councilmember Hale
Vice-Mayor Gallier
Mayor Baugh

2.0 INVOCATION - Lynn Fritz, Karuk Tribal Descendant, chair, Shasta Interfaith.

3.0 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Council member Mike Gallagher.

4.0 STUDENT REPORTS
a. A representative from the teen center will give an update on current activities. b. Mayor Baugh will recognize Alias Raby a student from Anderson High School on taking second place in the 2025 CIF State Wrestling Championships.

4.2 PROCLAMATION - A Proclamation proclaiming May 18-24, 2025 as Public Works Week will be presented to Public Works Director Adam Whelen.

4.3 PRESENTATIONS - Anderson Community Economic Development Director (ACED) Hope Seth will give a presentation on ACED and an overview of ICSC.

5.2 PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA - This is the time to address public comments by any member of the public to the Council regarding an item not on the agenda. Each comment must be limited to 3 minutes or less and on an item within the City's subject matter jurisdiction. The Brown Act does not permit any action or discussion on items not listed on the agenda. Are there any public comments?

CONSENT AGENDA

6.0 CONSENT AGENDA - Consent Agenda items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any member of the public, staff or City Council may request that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda for separate discussion. Are there any requests to remove any items from the Consent Agenda?

6.1 MINUTES-Approve the minutes of the regular meeting of April 1, 2025.

6.2 WARRANTS - Receive and file warrant 34395 to 34448 in the amount of $295,979.11; Receive and file warrant 34449 to 34513 in the amount of$393,925.85 City Council Meeting
April 15, 2025

6.6 FINANCE DIRECTOR - Receive and file the quarterly treasurer's report for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2024.

END OF CONSENT CALENDAR

6.11 ITEMS (IF ANY) REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR - Items removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion will be treated as Regular Agenda items and any member of the public may request to address the Council on any such item as it comes up for discussion. Please provide your name and limit your remarks to 3 minutes or less.

REGULAR AGENDA

8.0 REGULAR AGENDA - Regular Agenda Items will be discussed individually and in order.

Any member of the public may request to address the Council on an item as it comes up for discussion. Please provide your name and limit your remarks to 3 minutes or less.

CITY MANAGER

8.3a LETTER OF OPPOSITION TOWARDS SENATE BILL 79 (WIENER) AND SB 634 (PEREZ) AND LETTER OF SUPPORT TOWARDS SENATE BILL 74 (SEYARTO) AND SENATE BILL 496 (HURTADO)
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. Review draft letters.

2. Send letters of opposition towards SB 79 (Wiener) Transit-oriented development and SB 634 (Perez) Homelessness: Civil and criminal penalties

3. Send letter of support towards SB 7 4 (Seyarto) Critical Infrastructure Gap Fund and SB 496 (Hurtado) Advanced Clean Fleets

8.3b 2025 COST ALLOCATION PLAN AND CITYWIDE FEE STUDY PROPOSAL RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. Receive a Staff Report;

2. Review the proposal from Revenue & Cost Specialists, LLC.

3. Authorize the City Manager to execute a Professional Service Agreement with Revenue & Cost Specialists, LLC for the 2025 Cost Allocation Plan and Citywide Fee Study

11.0 COUNCIL REPORTS/COMMENTS - City Councilmembers will report on attendance at conferences/meetings reimbursed at City expense (Requirement of Assembly Bi/11234.)

12.0 Public Comment on Closed Session ltem(s); Anyone in the audience who wants to address the City Council on a subject which is listed under the Closed Session agenda is now invited to come to the podium. Please provide your name and the subject you wish to discuss. Please limit your remarks to 3 minutes or less.

City Council Meeting
April 15, 2025
Page4
The City Council will convene to Closed Session.

CLOSED SESSION
C.S.1 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (§54957.6) - Agency designated representatives: City Manager Joey Forseth-Deshais - Employee organization: Anderson Police Officers Association C.S.2 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-ANTICIPATED LITIGATION - Initiation of litigation pursuant to§ 54956.9(c): One case The City Council will reconvene to Qs,en Session.

13.0 CLOSED SESSION ANNOUNCEMENT: The Mayor will announce the results of the Closed Session.

14.0 ADJOURN -The City Council will adjourn to May 6, 2025.

PROCLAMATION

NATIONAL PUBLIC WORKS WEEK
May 18-24, 2025
WHEREAS, public works professionals focus on infrastructure, facilities, and services that are of vital importance to sustainable and resilient communities and to the public health, high quality of life, and well-being of the people of the City of Anderson; and, WHEREAS, these infrastructure, facilities, and services could not be provided without the dedicated efforts of public works professionals, who are engineers. managers, and employees at all levels of government, who are responsible for rebuilding, improving, and protecting our transportation, water supply, water treatment, public buildings, and other structures and facilities essential for our citizens; and,
WHEREAS, the quality and effectiveness of these facilities, as well as their planning, design, and construction, is vitally dependent upon the efforts and skills of public works officials; and
WHEREAS, the efficiency of the qualified and dedicated personnel who staff public works departments is materially influenced by the people's attitude and understanding of the importance of the work they perform; and
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest for the citizens, civic leaders, and children in the City of Anderson to gain knowledge of and maintain an ongoing interest and understanding of the importance of public works and public works programs in their respective communities; and, WHEREAS, the year 2025 marks the 65th annual National Public Works Week, "People, Purpose, Presence", sponsored by the American Public Works Association; and, NOW, THEREFORE, as the Mayor of the City of Anderson, State of California, and on behalf of the Anderson City Council, I do hereby designate the week of May 18-24, 2025, as National Public Works Week. I urge all citizens to join with representatives of the American Public Works Association and government agencies in activities, events, and ceremonies designed to pay tribute to our public works professionals, engineers, managers, and employees and to recognize the substantial contributions they make to protecting our health, safety, and advancing quality of life for all.

AND BE IT FURTHER KNOWN, that the City Council of the City of Anderson does hereby recognize our own public works employees and commend their devotion, contribution, and service to the health and safety of our community.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and
caused the Corporate Seal of the City of Anderson to be affixed this 15th day of April 2025.

Susie Baugh, Mayor

ANDERSON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Regular Meeting
April 1, 2025

REGULAR SESSION
The regular session was called to order at 5:30 p.m.

ROLL CALL
Councilmembers present: Councilmember Simmons
Councilmember Gallagher
Councilmember Hale
Vice-Mayor Gallier
Mayor Baugh
DRAFT
Also present: City Manager Joey Forseth-Deshais, City Attorney Collin Bogener, Police Chief Oliver Collins, Public Works Director Adam Whelen, Finance Director Cindy Wheeler and City Clerk Christy White.

INVOCATION
Nick Braito, Neighborhood Church of Anderson/Cottonwood, gave the invocation.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Susie Baugh led the Pledge of Allegiance.

PROCLAMATION
A Proclamation proclaiming April 4-15, 2025 as Week of the Young Child was presented to Baron Browning, First 5 Shasta.

A Proclamation proclaiming the month of April as Child Abuse Prevention Awareness Month was presented to Taylor Hartsock, Raising Shasta.

PRESENTATION
Police Chief Oliver Collins will give a presentation on the Anderson Police Department Annual Report for 2024.

PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA
Alexis and Liz from First 5 Shasta spoke on the Proclamation received proclaiming April 4- 15, 2025 as Week of the Young Child thanking Council for their support.

ITEM 6.1 4/15/2025
City Council Meeting
April 15, 2025

CONSENT AGENDA
By motion made, second (Gallier/Hale) and carried by a 5-0 vote, Council took the following action.

Approved the minutes of the regular meeting of March 18, 2025.

Received and filed warrant 34290 to 34343 in the amount of $142,508.88; Received and filed ACH in the amount of $60,531.50; Received and filed warrant 34344 to 34394 in the amount of $60,587.14
Approved the First Amendment to the Refuse, Recycling and Green Waste Agreement between the City of Anderson and USA Waste of California, Inc.

Adopted Resolution No 25-10 directing David Taussig & Associates, Inc. to file the Annual Report for Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 2006-1 for the Vineyards at Anderson, with an authorized cost of living increase.

Adopted Resolution No 25-11 directing EFS Engineering, Inc. to file the Annual Report for South Ridge Terrace - Unit 1 Landscaping Maintenance District. with an authorized cost of living increase.

Adopted Resolution No 25-12 directing Pace Engineering, Inc. to file the Annual Report for Sanitary Sewer Maintenance District 01-09, Silvergate Subdivision, with an authorized cost of living increase.

Adopted Resolution No 25-09 directing PACE Engineering, Inc. to file the Annual Report for Assessment District No. 1993-2, with no rate increase or change in assessment methodology. This assessment district does not allow for rate increases.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Council members Gallier, Hale, Simmons, Gallagher and Mayor Baugh.

None.

None.

None.

REGULAR AGENDA

CITY MANAGER

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH THE SHASTA FAMILY YMCA (YMCA) TO

PROVIDE THE SWIMMING PROGRAM FOR THE CITY OF ANDERSON
City Manager Joey Forseth-Deshais gave a staff report and answered questions from Council.

City Council Meeting
April 15, 2025

By motion made, seconded (Gallagher/Hale) and carried by a 5-0 vote Council voted to authorize the City Manager to sign an agreement with YMCA to provide swim lessons for the summer of 2025 season and offer Cascade Union Elementary School District Summer Program Swim Lessons.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Councilmembers Gallagher, Hale, Simmons, Gallier and Mayor Baugh.

None.

None.

None.

PUBLIC WORKS

FINAL WASTEWATER RATE STUDY REPORT
Public Works Director Adam Whelen along with Catherine from Lechowicz + Tseng Municipal Consultants gave a staff report, a presentation and answered questions from Council.

By motion made, seconded (Gallagher/Simmons) and carried by a 5-0 vote Council voted to proceed with Proposition 218 noticing and continue with option b increases as discussed at the February 18, 2025 meeting.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Councilmembers Gallagher, Simmons, Hale, Gallier and Mayor Baugh.

None.

None.

None.

COUNCIL REPORTS/COMMENTS
Councilmembers used this time to report on meetings and activities they participated in and to announce upcoming events.

ADJOURNMENT
7:22 p.m.; The City Council awourned to Aud/ 15. 2025,
Susie Baugh, Mayor
ATTEST:

Christy White, City Clerk

AGENDA ITEM
IApril 15, 2025 City Council Meeting
d for Submittal By:

To
Cin
To:

Through:

Honorable Mayor and Members of the Anderson City Council Joey Forseth-Deshais, City Manager
From: Cindy Wheeler, Finance Director /Treasurer
Date: April 15, 2025
!SUBJECT
Receive and File Weekly Warrant Registers.

I RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file warrant 34395 to 34448 in the amount of $295,979.11; Receive and file warrant 34449 to 34513 in the amount of $393,925.85

I ATTACHMENT
Warrant Registers.

ITEM 6.2 PAGE1 4/15/2025

CHECK REGISTER

NAME CHECK CHECK CHECK

VENDOR DESCRIPTION DATE NUMBER AMOUNT
000083 ACE HARDWARE
SUPPLIES-JOB#6 3/28/2025 034395 1,748.58
011929 ACME ANALYTICAL SOLUTIONS, INC
SUPPLIES 3/28/2025 034396 699.29
012192 ALHAMBRA
DRINKING WATER 3/28/2025 034397 339.21
000251 ALLDATA
SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 3/28/2025 034398 1,500.00
000323 AMERICAN FIDELITY ASSURANCE CO
CAFETERIA 125 PIE 3/14/25 3/28/2025 034399 1,032.80
000615 AT&T CALNET
PHONE CHARGES 3/28/2025 034400 64.30
010004 AWPSAFETY
SUPPLIES 3/28/2025 034401 77.87
012039 BDI
SUPPLIES 3/28/2025 034402 497.91
001133 BIG VALLEY SANITATION
EQUIPMENT RENTAL 3/28/2025 034403 575.00
002142 CINTAS FIRST AID & SAFETY
SUPPLIES 3/28/2025 034404 7.70
002434 COPYCATS
SUPPLIES 3/28/2025 034405 274.76
002634 CROWN MOTORS
PARTS 3/28/2025 034406 98.28
002973 DEPT OF JUSTICE
FINGERPRINT APPLICATIONS 3/28/2025 034407 177.00

NAME CHECK CHECK CHECK

VENDOR DESCRIPTION DATE NUMBER AMOUNT
011982 ED STAUB & SONS PETROLEUM
FUEL CHARGES 3/28/2025 034408 1,570.57
011715 EMMA FARMER
PER DIEM-TRAINING 3/28/2025 034409 214.20
003590 FASTENERS INC.

SUPPLIES 3/28/2025 034410 16.15
011976 JOEY FORSETH-DESHAIS
PER DIEM-CONFERENCE 3/28/2025 034411 107.00
004040 GENERALTEAMSTERS#137
DUES FOR MONTH OF MAR-25 3/28/2025 034412 7,629.00
004415 DARIN HALE
HEALTH INS. REIMBURSEMENT 3/28/2025 034413 556.44
012341 SARAH HAYES
KEY DEPOSIT REFUND 3/28/2025 034414 10.00
004823 HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS & ASSOC
CONTRACT SVCS-TRAN TAX Q3/24 3/28/2025 034415 1,718.35
012342 HUNT OIL OF CALIFORNIA
SUPPLIES 3/28/2025 034416 1,108.80
012327 CRYSTALJACKSON
CLEANING DEPOSIT REFUND 3/28/2025 034417 350.00
005631 KIRVIN INVESTIGATIONS
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3/28/2025 034418 500.00
005889 LAUNDRY WORLD
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3/28/2025 034419 2,623.12
005945 LECHOWICZ & TSENG MUNICIPAL CONSULTANTS
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3/28/2025 034420 5,495.04
006059 LITHIA MOTORS, INC.

PROFESSIONAL SVCS & PARTS 3/28/2025 034421 202.94
Page2

NAME CHECK CHECK CHECK

VENDOR DESCRIPTION DATE NUMBER AMOUNT
006723 DARREN MENDOZA
PER DIEM-TRAINING 3/28/2025 034422 471.00
007075 MUNICIPAL MTNC. EQUIPMENT
SUPPLIES 3/28/2025 034423 508.02
007202 NCCSIF
INSURANCE APPRAISAL 3/28/2025 034424 6,490.00
007342 NORCAL RENTALS & SALES
EQUIPMENT RENTAL 3/28/2025 034425 323.25
007394 NORTHERN CALIF. GLOVES
SUPPLIES 3/28/2025 034426 105.64
007477 OBSIDIAN IT
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3/28/2025 034427 472.06
007493 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, LLC
OFFICE SUPPLIES 3/28/2025 034428 61.62
007608 OZZIE'S BMW MOTORCYCLES
PROFESSIONAL SVCS & PARTS 3/28/2025 034429 875.35
007630 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC
UTILITIES 3/28/2025 034430 56.91
007669 PAPE MACHINERY
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3/28/2025 034431 75.42
007750 PAYLESS BUILDING SUPPLY
MATERIALS 3/28/2025 034432 2,314.87
008181 QUADIENT FINANCE USA, INC.

METERED POSTAGE 3/28/2025 034433 1,500.00
012143 R3 CONSULTING GROUP INC.

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3/28/2025 034434 5,945.00
008399 REDDING PRINTING COMPANY.INC
PROFESSIONAL SVCS & SUPPLIES 3/28/2025 034435 103.44
Page3

NAME CHECK CHECK CHECK

VENDOR DESCRIPTION DATE NUMBER AMOUNT
009256 SCP DISTRIBUTORS, LLC
SUPPLIES 3/28/2025 034436 218.31
009357 SHARPS SOLUTIONS, LLC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3/28/2025 034437 109.95
009365 SHASCOM
DISPATCH & CAD SERVICES 3/28/2025 034438 196,721.00
009501 SHASTA WELDING SUPPLY, INC.

SUPPLIES 3/28/2025 • 034439 1,102.66
012311 BONNIE SIMMONS
PER DIEM-CONFERENCE 3/28/2025 034440 107.00
012016 SISKIYOU OPPORTUNITY CENTER
JANITORIAL SERVICES 3/28/2025 034441 1,871.44
010075 STIMPEL WIEBELHAUS ASSOCIATES, INC.

MATERIALS 3/28/2025 034442 1,205.28
010255 T ANDS DVBE, INC.

SUPPLIES 3/28/2025 034443 59.85
010367 THATCHER COMPANY, INC.

SUPPLIES 3/28/2025 034444 17,058.44
010747 US BANK CORP PYMT SYSTEMS
SUPPLIES,TRV,TRAINING & EQPMNT 3/28/2025 034445 21,179.57 VOID CHECK 3/28/2025 034446
010874 VERIZON WIRELESS
PHONE CHARGES 3/28/2025 034447 6,183.72
011305 PETER WICKENHEISER
REIMBURSEMENT-TUITION 3/28/2025 034448 1,665.00
295,979.11
M ~ Oale
Page4

CHECK REGISTER

NAME CHECK CHECK CHECK

VENDOR DESCRIPTION DATE NUMBER AMOUNT
000243 ALL CAR & TRUCK TOWING, LLC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4/4/2025 034449 155.00
000349 AMERICAN TOWER CORPORATION
MONTHLY TOWER RENT 4/4/2025 034450 975.00
001750 CALIFORNIA SAFETY CO.

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4/4/2025 034451 28.00
001754 CALIFORNIA VISION SERVICE
INSURANCE PREMIUM 4/4/2025 034452 71.70
001912 CASCADE COMFORT SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4/4/2025 034453 1,952.00
012332 CESAR STREAMING SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4/4/2025 034454 393.75
002142 CINTAS FIRST AID & SAFETY
SUPPLIES 4/4/2025 034455 118.88
002167 CITY OF REDDING
UTILITIES 4/4/2025 034456 238.86
002199 CLARK PEST CONTROL OF STOCKTON INC.

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4/4/2025 034457 759.00
012237 OLIVER COLLINS
CELLPHONE REIMBURSEMENT 4/4/2025 34458 75.00
002634 CROWN MOTORS
PARTS 4/4/2025 034459 94.64
012343 SHANNON DAVIS
FACILITY RENTAL REFUND 4/4/2025 034460 47.50
002983 DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MTNC #02-0041 4/4/2025 034461 245.31

NAME CHECK CHECK CHECK

VENDOR DESCRIPTION DATE NUMBER AMOUNT
003396 EMERGENCY VEHICLE OUTFITTING COMPANY, LLC
PROFESSIONAL SVCS & EQUIPMENT 4/4/2025 034462 7,267.73
003423 ENERPOWER
UTILITIES 4/4/2025 034463 3,429.00
003590 FASTENERS INC.

SUPPLIES 4/4/2025 034464 64.61
003618 FERGUSON WATERWORKS #1423
SUPPLIES 4/4/2025 034465 2,620.84
011976 JOEY FORSETH-DESHAIS
CELLPHONE REIMBURSEMENT 4/4/2025 034466 75.00
011883 ADAM FROEBER
CELLPHONE REIMBURSEMENT 4/4/2025 034467 75.00
004205 GOODYEAR COMMERCIAL TIRE
PROFESSIONAL SVCS & PARTS 4/4/2025 034468 716.10
004248 GRAINGER
SUPPLIES 4/4/2025 034469 211.13
004592 HAVEN HUMANE SOCIETY
ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES 4/4/2025 034470 9,576.71
009321 HOPE SETH CONSULTING
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4/4/2025 034471 2,940.00
005060 HYDRAULIC CONTROLS, INC.

SUPPLIES 4/4/2025 034472 297.79
005076 IBM CORPORATION
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4/4/2025 034473 99.00
005169 J & T CONSULTING, INC.

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4/4/2025 034474 2,751.00
005401 NICHOLAS JONES
CELLPHONE REIMBURSEMENT 4/4/2025 034475 75.00

NAME

VENDOR DESCRIPTION
005445 K & S STAFFING SOLUTIONS, INC.

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
012344 SERINA KING

CLEANING DEPOSIT REFUND
005667 ERIC KNIGHT

CELLPHONE REIMBURSEMENT
012345 SARAH LADD

KEY DEPOSIT REFUND
006026 LIDDELL CONST. SUPPLY INC.

SUPPLIES
006153 LOUCKS LANDSCAPE SUPPLY

MATERIALS
012347 JOHN MARK MATTOCKS

PARKING CITATION REFUND
011792 MISSIONSQUARE-302204
PLAN #302204 PE 3/28/25
007075 MUNICIPAL MTNC. EQUIPMENT

SUPPLIES
007118 MUTUAL OF OMAHA
INSURANCE PREMIUM-APR 25
007134 N.C.G.T. TRUST FUND

HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM
007202 NCCSIF
WORKERS COMPENSATION INS.
012346 TANIELLE NEWMAN

FACILITY RENTAL REFUND

CHECK CHECK CHECK

DATE NUMBER AMOUNT
4/4/2025 034476 716.25
4/4/2025 034477 350.00
4/4/2025 034478 75.00
4/4/2025 034479 10.00
4/4/2025 034480 385.62
4/4/2025 034481 1,598.04
4/4/2025 034482 5.00
4/4/2025 034483 4,460.00
4/4/2025 034484 850.47
4/4/2025 034485 2,125.23
4/4/2025 034486 112,020.00
4/4/2025 034487 95,079.00
4/4/2025 034488 595.00
Page3
NAME

VENDOR DESCRIPTION
007477 OBSIDIAN IT

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
007617 PACE ENGINEERING, INC.

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
007630 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC

UTILITIES
007669 PAPE MACHINERY

PROFESSIONAL SVCS & PARTS
007750 PAYLESS BUILDING SUPPLY

MATERIALS
007803 PEOPLE FACTS, LLC

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
012245 POINT AND PAY

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
008045 POWER DRAULICS INC.

SUPPLIES
011940 QUICK QUACK CAR WASH

CAR WASHES
009045 SAFEGUARD FIRE PROTECTION

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
009551 SHIELD REGIONAL TRAINING CONSORTIUM

TRAINING-POST USE OF FORCE
009564 SHN CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND G

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
012311 BONNIE SIMMONS
HEALTH INS. REIMBURSEMENT
010181 SUNBLOCKERS AUTO WINDOW TINTIN
Page4

CHECK CHECK

DATE NUMBER
4/4/2025 034489
4/4/2025 034490
4/4/2025 034491
4/4/2025 034492
4/4/2025 034493
4/4/2025 034494
4/4/2025 034495
4/4/2025 034496
4/4/2025 034497
4/4/2025 034498
4/4/2025 034499
4/4/2025 034500
4/4/2025 034501
CHECK
AMOUNT
2,469.25
30,425.00
68,936.60
338.79

93.47 54.68

10.00 330.63
778.59
1,032.77
330.00
13,833.75
345.50

NAME CHECK CHECK CHECK

VENDOR DESCRIPTION DATE NUMBER AMOUNT
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4/4/2025 034502 429.00
010255 T ANDS DVBE, tNC.

SUPPLIES 4/4/2025 034503 209.46
010346 TELSTAR INSTRUMENTS, INC.

SUPPLIES 4/4/2025 034504 520.43
011972 THE PUN GROUP, LLP
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4/4/2025 034505 8,925.00
010579 TRANSUNION RISK AND ALTERNATIV DATA SOLUTIONS, INC.

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4/4/2025 034506 75.00
010749 US BANK VOYAGER FLEET SYSTEMS
FUEL CHARGES 4/4/2025 034507 10,431.62
010756 USA BLUEBOOK
SUPPLIES 4/4/2025 034508 75.70
011674 WELLS FARGO VENDOR FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC
MONTHLY LEASE 4/4/2025 034509 357.45
011245 CINDY WHEELER
CELLPHONE REIMBURSEMENT 4/4/2025 034510 75.00
011858 ADAM WHELEN
CELLPHONE REIMBURSEMENT 4/4/2025 034511 75.00
011260 CHRISTY WHITE
CELLPHONE REIMBURSEMENT 4/4/2025 034512 75.00
011305 PETER WICKENHEISER
CELLPHONE REIMBURSEMENT 4/4/2025 034513 75.00
393,925.85
ffe£ ~1/J.b
Gale
Pages

AGENDA ITEM
!April 15, 2025, City Council Meeting!
d for Submittal By:

Ci Wheeler, Finance Director / Treasurer
To:

Through:

Honorable Mayor and Members of the Anderson City Council Joey Forseth-Deshais, City Manager
From: Cindy Wheeler, Finance Director /Treasurer
Date: April 15, 2025

I SUBJECT
Quarterly Treasurer's Report on City Investments

I RECOMMENDATION
The Finance Director recommends that the City Council:

Receive and file the quarterly treasurer's report for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2024

I FISCAL IMPACT
This action has no direct fiscal impact. The report is for information purposes only.

I DISCUSSION and BACKGROUND
State law requires the City Treasurer to report every fiscal quarter to the City Council about the city's investments. The attached report includes complete information about the city treasury and certifies that the city's investments are in accordance with state law and the Council's adopted investment policy. I ATTACHMENTS
Quarterly Treasurer's Report and Certification for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2024.

ITEM 6.6 PAGE1 4/15/2025
City of Anderson
Quarterly Certification of Compliance with Investment Policy Quarter Ended December 31, 2024
A. Section 8.1 of the City's Investment Policy restricts the amount of pooled funds which may be invested in certain types of investments. These types of investments and a statement of compliance are below.

Investment T~12e Maximum investment Current Investment Percent of Total Below Maximum? Banker's Acceptances 15% of Total Portfolio $0 0.00% Yes Certificates of Deposit 30% of Total Portfolio $0 0.00% Yes Prime Commercial Paper 15% of Total Portfolio $0 0.00% Yes Medium-term Corporate Notes 15% of Total Portfolio $0 0.00% Yes B. Section 13.1 of the City's Investment Policy restricts the overall maturities of pooled investments. These restrictions and a statement of compliance are below.

Maturity Investment Restrictio.n
Within One Year 50% of Total - Minimum
Between Three and Five Years 25% of Total - Maximum
Over Five Years None Allowed
Current Investment
$2,348,957
$0
$0
Percent of Total
100.00%

0.00%

0.00%
Limit Met?
Yes
Yes
Yes
C. Section 13.1 of the City's Investment Policy provides that the average investment maturity must be less than three years.

Weighted Average Days to Maturity of Treasurer's Pool:

Restriction Met?: Yes
I hereby certify that as of December 31, 2024 the investment of the City of Anderson comply in all respects with the requirements of the California Government Code and the City's current Investment Policy and that there is sufficient cash flow to cover the next six months expenditures.

Certified by:

Attachment 1
City of Anderson
Quarterly Report on the Treasurer's Investment Pool
Quarter Ended December 31, 2024
Days to
Checking and Passbook accounts
Primary Checking
Issuer Yield to Maturity Rate Maturity Par Value Book Value Payroll Checking
Checking - City Events
Passbook Savings
REDIP Reserve Acct
Money Market
Subtotal
Certificates of Deposit
Local Agency Investment Fund
Local Agency Investment Fund
Petty Cash
Petty Cash
Tri-Counties Bank
Tri-Counties Bank
Tri-Counties Bank
Tri-Counties Bank
Tri-Counties Bank
Tri-Counties Bank
na
na
Total Funds Held by the City of Anderson on December 31,2024 Total Funds Held by the City of Anderson on September 30,2024 Weighted Average Yields
Weighted Average Days to Maturity
Percent Maturing within One Year
Percent Maturing behNeen One and Three Years
Percent Maturing behNeen Three and Five Years
na na
na na
na na
na 0.01%
na 0.01%
na 0.40%
na 4.476%
na na

2.235%
na
na
na
na
na
na
1 na
1 100.00%

0.00%

0.00%
873.617
1,000
851
33,288
21,193
267,441
1,197,390
0 1,148,717
2,850
2,348,957
4,207,928
(1,858,971)
626.464
1,000
851
33,288
21,193
~6~441
950,237
0 1,148,717
2,850
2,101,804
3,738,405
(1,636,601)
Percent of
Credit Rating Total
Market Value (Notes) Investments
626.464 na

1.000 na
851 na
33,288 na
21 ,193 na
267.441 na
950,237 45.21%
0 0.00%
1,148,717 na 54.65%
2,850 na 0.136%
2,101,804 100.0%
3,738,405
(1,636,601)
City of Anderson
Quarterly Report on Funds Held Outside the Treasurer's Pool Quarter Ended December 31, 2024
Issuer Yield to Maturi~ Rate
Superior California Economic Development District
Checking Account Cornerstone Community Bank na 0.00%
Amerinational Community Services Group na na
Funds Held by Trustee (US Bank) for Redevelopment Agency (2005) Retired Funds Held by Trustee (US Bank) for Redevelopment Agency (2008) Retired Funds Held by Trustee (US Bank) for Redevelopment Agency (2015) 4.90% na Funds Held by Trustee (Union Bank) for Wastewater Bonds 0.00% na Misssion Square Retirement (Formerly ICMA Retirement)
Employee Directed Investments na na
Total Funds Held by the City of Anderson Outside the Treasurer's Investment Pool on December 31, 2024 Total Funds Held by the City of Anderson Outside the Treasurer's Investment Pool on September 30, 2024 Difference
Maturi~ Date
na
na
na
na
na
Par Value
0 0
0 0
489,388
2,358,504
2,847,892
2,828,491
19,401
Book Value
0 0
0 0
489,388
2,358,504
2,847,892
2,828,491
19,401
Market Value
0 0
0 0
489,388
2,358,504
2,847,892
2,828,491
19,401

AGENDA ITEM
April 15, 2025 City Council Meeting
To:

From:

Honorable Mayor and Members of the Anderson City Council Joey Forseth- Deshais, City Manager
Date: April 15, 2025
l suBJECT
Letter of opposition towards Senate Bill 79 (Wiener) and SB 634 (Perez) and letter of support towards Senate Bill 74 (Seyarto) and Senate Bill 496 (Hurtado)

I RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council:

1. Review draft letters.

2. Send letters of opposition towards SB 79 (Wiener) Transit-oriented development and SB 634 (Perez) Homelessness: Civil and criminal penalties

3. Send letter of support towards SB 7 4 (Seyarto) Critical Infrastructure Gap Fund and SB 496 (Hurtado) Advanced Clean Fleets
!FISCAL IMPACT
This action has no fiscal impact.

I DISCUSSION and BACKGROUND
SB 79 doubles down on the recent trend of the state overriding its own mandated local housing elements. This latest overreaching effort forces cities to approve transit-oriented development projects near specified transit stops - up to seven stories high and a density of 120 homes per acre - without regard to the community's needs, environmental review, or public input.

ITEM 8.3a PAGE1 4/15/2025
Most alarmingly, SB 79 defies cities' general plans and provides transit agencies unlimited land use authority on property they own or have a permanent easement, regardless of the distance from a transit stop. Transit agencies would have the power to determine all aspects of the development including height, density, and design, without any regard to local zoning or planning.

SB 634 The California Constitution authorizes a county or city to make and enforce within its limits all local, police, sanitary, and other ordinances and regulations not in conflict with general laws. Current law establishes procedures for the enactment of ordinances by counties and cities and makes a violation of a county or city ordinance, as applicable, a misdemeanor unless by ordinance it is made an infraction. Current law also prohibits a state agency from adopting or enforcing any rule or a violation of which can result in the imposition of a fine or imprisonment, or both, unless a statute specifically authorizes the imposition of such fine or imprisonment, or both, for a violation of the rule or regulation.

This bill would prohibit a local jurisdiction from adopting a local ordinance, or enforcing an existing ordinance, that imposes civil or criminal penalties on a person who is homeless for any act immediately related to homelessness or any act related to basic survival, or on a person who is assisting a person who is homeless with any act related to basic survival. The bill would similarly prohibit a state agency from adopting any regulation or issuing any policy or guidance, or enforcing an existing regulation, policy, or guidance, that imposes those civil or criminal penalties. The bill would define various terms for these purposes.

SB 74 will help bridge a funding gap by offering grants that support roads, bridges, water systems, and other vital infrastructure, ensuring safer and more efficient communities. As California's local governments continue to grow, so does the need for reliable and sustainable infrastructure. However, many local governments struggle to fund essential projects due to financial constraints, making it difficult to meet the demands of our residents and businesses.

The devasting fires across the state and most recently in Southern California have shown vulnerabilities in our local infrastructures. Investing in public infrastructure is crucial to preventing fires and protecting lives. Adequate funding for fire-resistant building materials, modernized electrical grids, and well-maintained roadways ensures that both public and private spaces are safeguarded against potential fire threats. Furthermore, upgrading water supply systems, such as expanding hydrant networks and improving water pressure, is essential for effective firefighting efforts.

SB 496 This bill creates an appeals advisory committee made up of state agencies, industry experts, fleets, and local governments to navigate the exemption and extension process for the California Air Resource Board (CARB) Advanced Clean Fleets (ACF) regulation.

It amends the definition of an authorized emergency vehicle as defined in the ACF regulation to expand the types of vehicles covered by the Emergency Vehicle Exemption.

It amends the ACF regulation to allow a fleet to petition to waive the 10 percent Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV)/Near-Zero Emission Vehicle (NZEV) requirement from the Daily Usage Exemption where it is impractical for them to meet the requirement for their specific ITEM 8.3a PAGE2 4/15/2025
fleet. Further, it seeks to increase flexibility and expand the applicability of the Daily Usage Exemption.

Lastly, this bill amends the Infrastructure Delay Extension so that a fleet can apply for a waiver without the requirement of purchasing a ZEV.

I ATTACHMENTS

1. Letter of Opposition SB 79 (Weiner)

2. Letter of Opposition SB 634 (Perez)

3. Letter of Support SB 74 (Seyarto)

4. Letter of Support SB 496 (Hurtado)
ITEM 8.3a PAGE3 4/15/2025
April 15, 2025
The Honorable Scott Wiener
Senator, California State Senate
1021 0 St, Suite 8620
Sacramento, CA 95814
RE: se 79 (Wiener) Transit-oriented Development
Notice of Opposition
Dear Senator Wiener,
The City Anderson writes to express our strong opposition to your SB 79 (Wiener), which would disregard state-certified housing elements and bestow land use authority to transit agencies without any requirement that developers build housing, let alone affordable housing.

SB 79 doubles down on the recent trend of the state overriding its own mandated local housing elements. This latest overreaching effort forces cities to approve transit-oriented development projects near specified transit stops - up to seven stories high and a density of 120 homes per acre - without regard to the community's needs, environmental review, or public input.

Most alarmingly, SB 79 defies cities' general plans and provides transit agencies unlimited land use authority on property they own or have a permanent easement, regardless of the distance from a transit stop. Transit agencies would have the power to determine all aspects of the development including height, density, and design, without any regard to local zoning or planning.

This broad new authority applies to both residential and commercial development. Transit agencies could develop 100% commercial projects - even at transit stops - and not provide a single new home, while simultaneously making the argument that more housing must be constructed around transit stops.

City Council
1887 Howard Street
Anderson,CA 96007
www.cl.andersoo.ca,us Phone: (530) 378-6646
Fax: (530) 378-6648
As currently drafted, SB 79 will not spur much-needed housing construction in a manner that supports local flexibility, decision-making, and community input. State-driven ministerial or by-right housing approval processes fail to recognize the extensive public engagement associated with developing and adopting zoning ordinances and housing elements.

California will never produce the number of homes needed with an increasingly state-driven, by-right housing approval process. What we really need is a sustainable state investment and local control. The state's housing crisis cannot be solved by a one shoe fits all approach that removes local control. The City of Anderson has its own unique challenges with aging infrastructure, unique zoning, and a more rural setting. It is best that all cities are given local control to figure out the best solution. For these reasons, the City of Anderson strongly opposes SB 79.

Sincerely,
Susie Baugh, Mayor
City of Anderson
cc. Your Senator & Assembly Member
Your League Regional Public Affairs Manager (via email) League of California Cities, [email protected]:

City Council
1887 Howard Street
Anderson, CA 96007
www.ci.anderson.ca,us Phone: (530) 378-6646
Fax: (530) 378-6648
April 15, 2025
The Honorable Maria Elena Durazo
Chair, Senate Local Government Committee
California State Capitol, Room 407
Sacramento, CA 95814
RE: SB 634 (Perez) Homelessness: civil and criminal penalties Notice of OPPOSITION (As Amended 03/26/25)
Dear Senator Durazo,
The City of Anderson opposes SB 634 (Perez), which would prohibit local jurisdictions from adopting or enforcing ordinances to address homelessness. While we recognize the bill's intent, SB 634 would severely limit cities' ability to respond to the growing homelessness crisis in communities across California.

Cities are implementing balanced approaches that protect both the rights of individuals experiencing homelessness and the broader community's needs for clean, safe, and accessible public spaces. SB 634 hinders this progress by prohibiting local governments from adopting any regulation, policy, or guidance that imposes civil or criminal penalties on a person experiencing homelessness. By eliminating all enforcement mechanisms, SB 634 gives people the right to stand, sit, lay, sleep, or put up a tent in any public place.

Cities have been sued by business owners for allowing encampments to block access to businesses and by disability rights advocates over encampments that have obstructed sidewalks and public spaces. Without the ability to use civil or criminal enforcement remedies, cities would face increased legal liability and more importantly, have no meaningful way to respond to urgent health and safety concerns. The City of Anderson recognizes that we must remain focused on connecting unhoused residents to housing and services, but cities also need basic tools to meet their legal obligations and protect public spaces.

SB 634 also directly contradicts cities' efforts to address encampments in response to the Governor's November 2024 executive order. The order directed state departments and City Council
1887 Howard Street
Anderson, CA 96007
www.ci.anderson.ca.us Phone: (530) 378-6646
Fax: (530) 378-6648
agencies to adopt policies to address homeless encampments on state properties and encouraged local governments to adopt similar policies or risk losing access to state homelessness funding. Cities want to help the state to realize our shared vision of reducing homelessness and supporting our most vulnerable residents. However, SB 634 leaves cities without any enforcement tools, hindering cities' ability to carry out the Governor's directive and jeopardizing state funding cities receive to address homelessness.

Local jurisdictions are already working within a complex and evolving legal landscape, including recent federal court decisions like Johnson v. Grants Pass, which clarified constitutional limits on how cities can address homelessness through enforcement actions.

In response to the Grants Pass ruling, the Governor stated:
"Today's ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court provides state and local officials the definitive authority to implement and enforce policies to clear unsafe encampments from our streets.

This decision removes the legal ambiguities that have tied the hands of local officials for years and limited their ability to deliver on common-sense measures to protect the safety and well-being of our communities."
SB 634 directly undermines this decision by stripping local governments of the authority to tailor enforcement strategies to their unique circumstances. It also disregards the years of legal effort cities have invested to gain the clarity now provided by the Court.

The City of Anderson urges the Legislature to support policies that empower local governments to act with compassion and urgency - not tie their hands behind their backs.

SB 634 does not reflect the nuanced, community-led solutions that are showing promise across the state. For these reasons, the City of Anderson must oppose SB 634 (Perez) Sincerely,
Susie Baugh, Mayor
City of Anderson
cc. Your Senator & Assembly Member
Your League Regional Public Affairs Manager (via email) League of California Cities, [email protected]
City Council
1887 Howard Street
Anderson, CA 96007
www.ci.anderson.ca.us Phone: (530) 378-6646
Fax: (530) 378-6648
April 15, 2025
The Honorable Kelly Seyarto
California State Senate
1021 0 Street, Room 7120
Sacramento, CA 95814
RE: SB 7 4 (Seyarto) Infrastructure Grants
Notice of SUPPORT
Dear Senator Seyarto,
The City of Anderson is pleased to support SB 74 (Seyarto), which seeks to establish an infrastructure gap-fund program to provide much-needed grants to local agencies for the development and construction of critical infrastructure projects.

As California's local governments continue to grow, so does the need for reliable and sustainable infrastructure. However, many local governments struggle to fund essential projects due to financial constraints, making it difficult to meet the demands of our residents and businesses. Senate Bill 74 will help bridge this funding gap by offering grants that support roads, bridges, water systems, and other vital infrastructure, ensuring safer and more efficient communities.

The devasting fires across the state and most recently in Southern California have shown vulnerabilities in our local infrastructures. Investing in public infrastructure is crucial to preventing fires and protecting lives. Adequate funding for fire-resistant building materials, modernized electrical grids, and well-maintained roadways ensures that both public and private spaces are safeguarded against potential fire threats. Furthermore, upgrading water supply systems, such as expanding hydrant networks and improving water pressure, is essential for effective firefighting efforts.

Beyond fire prevention, improved infrastructure enhances emergency response times and community resilience. Well-maintained roads and bridges allow first responders to reach City Council
1887 Howard Street
Anderson.CA 96007
www.d.anderson.ca.us Phone: (530) 378-6646
Fax: (530) 378-6648
emergency sites more quickly, while investments in communication systems ensure timely coordination between emergency services. Additionally, incorporating fire-safe designs in public buildings, schools, and transportation systems not only reduces the likelihood of fires but also protects vulnerable populations.

The City of Anderson believes that investing in local infrastructure is crucial for economic development, job creation, and public safety. By supporting SB 74, the State of California is making a commitment to strengthening our communities and ensuring that local agencies have the necessary resources to complete much-needed projects.

For these reasons, the City of Anderson is pleased to support SB 74 (Seyarto).

Sincerely,
Susie Baugh, Mayor
City of Anderson
cc. Your Senator & Assembly Member
Your League Regional Public Affairs Manager (via email) League of California Cities, cit,yletters@cacjties,Qrg
City Council
1887 Howard Street
Anderson, CA 96007
www&l,anderson.ca.us Phone: (S30) 378-6646
Fax: (530) 378-6648
April 15, 2025
The Honorable Melissa Hurtado
California State Senate
1021 0 Street, Room 6510
Sacramento, CA 95814
RE: SB 496 (HurtadQ) Advanced Clean Fleets.

Notice of SUPPORT (As introduced 2/19/2025
Dear Senator Hurtado,
The City of Anderson is pleased to support SB 496 (Hurtado), which would create an Advanced Clean Fleets (ACF) Appeals Advisory Committee, ensure disaster service workers are able to effectively respond to emergency situations, and provide some much needed and common-sense reforms for compliance.

The ACF sets ambitious compliance deadlines for fleets to transition to an increasing proportion of Zero Emission Vehicles (ZEVs). The ACF's ZEV transition requires access to adequate utility infrastructure for alternative fueling such as EV charging, as well as access to ZEVs that operationally can deliver the full spectrum of important and highly specialized services that fleets provide (many which are vital to the health and safety of Californians).

While the ACF allows that fleets may request exemptions granting compliance flexibility in cases where, for reasons beyond their control, fleets cannot meet the compliance timetables, the ACF does not provide clarity on how such exemption requests are to be evaluated and decided upon, nor does it provide a process for any administrative review of exemption request denials by the California Air Resources Board (CARB).

SB 496 establishes an Appeals Advisory Committee by which local agencies may request a review of exemption request denials. Allowing a formal appeals process ensures transparency while protecting due process for those seeking further review. In cases where a regulation allows for exemptions and extensions, best practices necessitate an appeals process. Such a process can be particularly helpful and impactful by offering clear and City Council
1887 Howard Street
Anderson, CA 96007
www.d.andef59p,ca.us Phone: (530) 378-6646
Fax: (530) 378-6648
feasible pathways to compliance without diminishing CARB's authority as this Appeals Advisory Committee would only operate in an advisory role.

Additionally, SB 496 would update the emergency vehicle exemption, allowing those vehicles that respond to and support critical operations related to emergencies and disasters, often under austere conditions, to continue to protect our communities. Our frontline workers and the communities they serve rely on vehicles that must be able to do the job the emergency dictates, even when the power is out. Especially given the rising toll of natural disasters in our state, we must prioritize the safety of our communities and the public servants that work around the clock through these unprecedented events.

Also, SB 496 modifies the requirements of the daily usage exemption, removing barriers for the applicant to comply with the mandate.

Finally, this measure promotes affordability in the midst of rapidly rising cost pressures on essential local services by averting the costly acquisition of ZEVs before it is possible to install the infrastructure required to use them. The infrastructure needs to be in place before the vehicles can be purchased.

SB 496 will create much-needed improvements to the ACF while protecting the health and safety of Californians, avoiding unnecessary costs and assisting cities comply with the ACF without being penalized for factors beyond their control.

Sincerely,
Susie Baugh, Mayor
City of Anderson
cc. Your Senator & Assembly Member
Your League Regional Public Affairs Manager (via email) League of California Cities, [email protected]
City Council
1887 Howard Street
Anderson, CA 96007
www.ci.anderson.ca.us Phone: (530) 378-6646
Fax: (530) 378-6648

AGENDA ITEM
I April 15, 2025, City Council Meeting
d for Submittal By:

To:

From:

Honorable Mayor and Members of the Anderson City Council Joey Forseth-Deshais, City Manager
Date: April 15, 2025

I SUBJECT
2025 Cost Allocation Plan and Citywide Fee Study Proposal

I RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Receive a Staff Report;

2. Review the proposal from Revenue & Cost Specialists, LLC.

3. Authorize the City Manager to execute a Professional Service Agreement with Revenue & Cost Specialists, LLC for the 2025 Cost Allocation Plan and Citywide Fee Study
!FISCAL IMPACT
The cost of this agreement shall not exceed $32,750.00 without prior approval from the City Manager. This cost will be funded through the General Operations Fund with 25% being incurred this fiscal year and the remainder being budgeted in fiscal year 2025-26.

I DISCUSSION and BACKGROUND
The City's costs associated with processing various types of permits, applications, and service requests have increased since the last fee increase. The Building Department fees were last updated by Resolution 11-06, which the City Council approved on February 1, 2011. Historically, when new versions of the California Building Codes were adopted, fees for building permits and building plan check services, along with updated hourly rates, were reviewed and, if necessary, adjusted. Since 2011, new California Building Codes have been adopted numerous times, but fees for these items have not been updated.

ITEM 8.3b PAGE1 4/15/2025
The Engineering Department fees were last updated by Resolution 96-57, which only amended a small subsection of the fees originally adopted by Resolution 89-31. Outside Consultants for the roles of City Engineer and City Surveyor augment the Engineering Department; these consultant costs are not accounted for in the fee schedule. On average, for a property line adjustment, the City spends $1,000 and only recovers $150, as per the approved fee schedule.

The Planning Department recently performed a fee update in 2020, approved by Resolution 20-30. Like the Engineering Department, the Planning Department is supplemented by consultants; these consultant costs are not included in the fee schedule.

There are currently items that are not included in the fee schedule that staff perform, such as addressing requests for new construction or a change of address, which has no cost recovery.

The Recreation Department fees have been updated at different times on an as needed basis. In 2023 the City set a fee of $50 for the summer camp program, which was originally free. Recovery & Cost Specialists will assist the City in creating a policy for cost recovery based upon the different recreational programs that are offered whether they are for adults or children.

Revenue & Cost Specialists proposes to begin with a comprehensive review of all services, permits, and applications that are being charged a fee or could be charged a fee. Once that is completed, fully burdened hourly rates for employees will be calculated to ensure that the fee covers the staff time or consultant rate. The next step is to conduct the fee study and generate a proposed fee structure for the City Council's review. The timeline for their overall evaluation and proposal to City Council will take approximately 6 months.

IATTACHl\(ENT

1. Proposal for Citywide Fee Study (March 2025), Revenue & Cost Specialists, LLC ITEM 8.3b PAGE2 4/15/2025
1519 E Chapman Ave
Suite C
Fullerton, CA 92831
(714) 992-9020
Proposal for the City of Anderson

COST ALLOCATION PLAN
& CITYWIDE FEE STUDY

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cover Letter ..................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Project Team ................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Firm's Experience ......................................................................................................................................................... 8 Methodology /Project Understanding .............................................................................................................. 10 Cost for Services ......................................................................................................................................................... 17 Proposal for Cost Allocation Plan and Citywide Fee Study Page/ 2
March 18, 2025
Joey Forseth-Deshais
City of Anderson
1887 Howard Street
Anderson, CA 96007
Proposal - Cost Allocation Plan & Citywide Fee Study
Revenue & Cost Specialists, LLC (RCS) appreciates the opportunity to respond with this proposal to develop a Cost Allocation Plan and Citywide Fee Study. We have been providing fee studies and other costing services since 1980, making us the first and foremost expert in costing services for California. RCS' skill set will generate maximum accountability for the City of Anderson. We have a history of delivering quality reports with defensible data that can be acted on and adopted.

Our processes are straightforward, analytical and require minimal staff time. In the end, we ~ strive to ensure that the City of Anderson will be able to confidently stand behind the information and recommendations in the Report. As former city staff ourselves, we understand how Anderson operates, what you want, and that your time is precious.

Based in California, we can provide timely support to City staff for years to come. The terms of this proposal will be honored for 90 calendar days from the date of submittal. Please contact Eric at (714) 992-9027 or [email protected] with any questions.

Sincerely,
ERIC S. JOHNSON
President
Revenue & Cost Specialists
1519 E. Chapman • Suite C • Fullerton, CA • 92831

ANDERSON PROJECT TEAM
While all RCS principals have worked independently on projects, Eric Johnson will be the project manager involved with the City of Anderson, and Chu Thai will provide off-site analysis and support.

RCS assigns two principals for several reasons. Often, both principals will attend the public hearing because two are better than one at convincing the policy makers. Two principals allow us to discuss high-level issues for each project. Most important to RCS, we want our principals to build long-term relationships with all our clients.

RCS may assign additional specialists to the project to help maintain the proposed schedule and ensure the quality of the product. For the sake of continuity, only RCS principals will interact with City staff, as our specialization and expertise will allow staff to focus on other City functions. We thoroughly understand and will be involved in every phase of the fee study, advising City staff when necessary.

RCS resumes for the project team are included in this proposal on the following pages.

Proposal for Cost Allocation Plan and Citywide Fee Study Page f 4

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Arts in Political
Science - University of
Redlands

AFFILIATIONS
California Society of
Municipal Finance Officers
Government Finance Officers
Association
iEric S. Johnson
I President
Mr. Johnson serves as President of Revenue & Cost Specialists with over 35 years of professional knowledge in cost recovery model and user fee studies. He focuses on providing a positive experience for RCS clients, which minimizes staff interruptions yet still produces a comprehensive, defensible study that is adopted by the governing board.

Municipal Experience
City of Redlands - Redevelopment Intern (1987-1989)
Relevant Project Experience
City of Long Beach - Comprehensive Fee Study: RCS was
selected in 2019 to perform a multi-year comprehensive
update of Long Beach's 2,850 fees, fines and permits.

City of Santa Clarita - Cost Allocation Plan and
Comprehensive Fee Study: RCS developed a Cost Allocation Plan and Comprehensive Fee Study for the City most recently in 2024 and has also updated the Cost Allocation Plan every year since 2011. RCS has been providing these services for the City since 1995.

City of Santa Barbara - Cost recovery model and
Comprehensive Fee Study: RCS completed a Development
Services Fee Study 2019 and a Fire Department Fee Study in 2020. The City Council adopted changes to its fee schedule.

City of Carson - Cost Allocation Plan and Comprehensive Fee Study: RCS completed a Cost Allocation Plan and
Comprehensive Fee Study for the City in 2022, and the City Council adopted the suggested user fees in 2023.

City of Lompoc - Cost recovery model and Comprehensive
Fee Study: RCS completed a Comprehensive Fee Study for the City originally in 2015 and most recently in 2022, in which the City adopted the suggested user fees.

Proposal for Cost Allocation Plan and Citywide Fee Study Page f 5

EDUCATION
Claremont Graduate
University - Completed
coursework towards
Masters in Public Policy
Cal State Northridge - MA
Public Administration
Cal Poly, Pomona - BS in
Urban and Regional
Planning

AFFILIATIONS
California Society of
Municipal Finance
Officers (CSMFO - Board
Member)
Government Finance
Officers Association
(GFOA)
International
City /County Management
Association (ICMA)
(Cal-lCMA)
Municipal Information
Systems Association of
California (MISAC)
Chu Thai
Partner
Mr. Thai provides multiple aspects to the implementation of user fees, impact fees and utility rates. His experience as a municipal finance officer helps clients reach their goal of fee adoption. Chu keeps current of all legal policies which impact the noticing, calculation and reporting of fees.

Municipal Experience
Impact Fees: Cities of Morgan Hill and Monterey Park
Utility Rates: Cities of Morgan Hill, Beverly Hills, South Pasadena and Monterey Park
User Fees: Cities of Claremont, Morgan Hill, Beverly Hills, South Pasadena and Monterey Park
Director of Management Services, City of Monterey Park, CA
• Managed department of 15 to provide financial
planning and reporting, revenue collections, treasury,
information technology, telecommunication and
support services
• Improved city's revenues through updated user fees,
utility rates, and impact fees
• Conducted long-term financial forecasting and analysis • Streamlined and enforced purchasing process
Administrative Services Director, City of Stanton, CA
• Managed department providing general accounting,
accounts payable, purchasing, payroll, business tax,
treasury, IT and communication services
• Updated the City's Investment Policy and strategy
• Developed long-term revenue strategy
• Performed communications audit and reduced
expenses by 75%
Finance Director, City of South Pasadena, CA
• Outsourced utility billing and customer service
• Completed $43.4 Million Water Bond Issuance and $12
Million Refunding
• Coordinated the passage of Utility Users Tax Ballot
Measure
• Negotiated lease agreements for city property and cell towers
Proposal for Cost Allocation Plan and Citywide Fee Study Page/ 6
Chu Thai
Partner
Municipal Experience (continued)
Budget and Management Officer, City of Beverly Hills, CA •
•
•
•
•
Managed $400 million citywide budget for 750 fulltime employees Developed comprehensive capital improvement
program
Developed quarterly performance report presented to
the City Council
Implemented performance-based budget, including
goals and objectives
Updated the city's user fees and utility rates
Budget Manager, City of Morgan Hill, CA
•
•
•
•
Managed utility billing, purchasing, business license
and accounts receivable functions
Coordinated IT overhaul, including finance, utility
billing and recreation software conversions,
standardization, training, disaster recovery and
outsourcing.

Developed pro-formas for proposed aquatics and
community centers
Updated the city's impact fees, user fees and utility
rates
Senior Management Analyst, City of Tustin, CA
• Coordinated the City's $80 million operating and CIP
budget with all departments
• Managed finance software upgrade, focusing on
departmental reports
• Deployed online payment system for utility customers
Management Analyst, City of Claremont, CA
• Assisted in the development of effective parks and
recreation programs
• Assisted in the construction and programming of the
Claremont Youth Activity Center, Claremont Skate
Park and Hughes Community Center
• Coordinated budget and evaluated cost recovery for
the department
Proposal for Cost Allocation Plan and Citywide Fee Study Page/ 7

FIRM'S EXPERIENCE AND REFERENCES

RCS HISTORY
Revenue & Cost Specialists, LLC (Taxpayer ID No.
330787781) was founded in 1980 by two former City
Managers and a Finance Director who, after the passage of Propositions 13 and 4, discovered that user fees were a legal option to recover lost municipal revenues. Four decades later, RCS continues its focus on cost allocation and fee calculation services.

After the passage of AB 1600 in 1988, our company added impact *
fee calculation services to help municipalities finance public facility expansion. In those early years, RCS principals published articles and presented at conferences, helping California municipal employees understand how fees work. Our early work is the foundation of how fees and cost allocation plans are calculated today.

In 2000, RCS created Government Software Systems to develop robust costing software that serves fee calculation needs better than spreadsheets. Our company has provided additional services to municipalities that include long-range financial planning, accounting procedures and utility rate studies.

RCS continues to thrive through repeat business, referrals and references. As a small business, RCS takes only a handful of new clients each year, allowing us to spend substantial time with them. In 2025, RCS celebrates its 45th year in business and is looking forward to another 40 plus years of partnering with municipalities.

QUALIFICATIONS
RCS' principals make up the Limited Liability Company, which has been financially stable since the company started. Combined, RCS principals have over 100 years of experience in cost allocation plans and fee studies and served over 250 municipalities. We have provided these services for a wide array of public agencies, from the smallest special district to larger and more complex cities and counties. Though based in Orange County, we engage in projects throughout the State of California.

RCS principals specialize in:
• User Fee Studies
• Cost Allocation Plans
• Development Impact Fee Studies
• Special Financial Management Studies and Reports
Proposal for Cost Allocation Plan and Citywide Fee Study Page/ 8
These specializations allow RCS to focus on every aspect of municipal fees and be the best of what we do. We are confident in our project time estimates and do not respond to RFPs when the project workload exceeds our capacity. We have suggested new fees that are not common practice throughout the state and have challenged and removed municipal fees that were not defensible. We have assisted municipalities in streamlining their fee-based processes.

All RCS principals have prior city experience, serving as analysts, managers or directors. We are all knowledgeable in fund accounting, department structures and municipal services. We stay current on pending financial and legal issues that challenge municipalities. All principals are comfortable speaking with city staff at all levels, drafting reports and resolutions, and presenting them to the public, stakeholders and City Council members.

Eric Johnson, President, has streamlined and perfected the process of CAP and User Fee Study engagements. With over 35 years and hundreds of studies completed, Eric has created a superior process that demands little staff time while obtaining maximum results. Eric quickly understands complex city services and how to calculate fees for them. He relates well with elected officials because he responds with candor and brevity. If you speak to any of Eric's prior or current clients, they will tell you how easy the process was.

Chu Thai, Partner, joined RCS after 25 years of municipal experience. As a budget manager and finance director, Chu has successfully coordinated user fee increases, impact fee increases, utility rate increases and tax ballot measures. His experience helps clients avoid the unseen perils that jeopardize municipal projects. After project completion, Chu leaves behind well-documented reports and spreadsheets for City staff. The focus of his career has been to improve cities' financial stability and implement operational effectiveness and efficiencies in local government.

Scott Thorpe, Senior Vice President, joined RCS in 1985. Before that, he spent 13 years at the cities of Chula Vista, Covina, Anaheim and Brea, serving in various roles within the city manager's offices. Scott performed user fee studies for several years, transitioning to development impact fees when AB 1600 went into effect. He has written articles laying out the fundamentals of impact fees, and his work has generated tens of millions in fee revenues for cities.

Rick Kermer, Partner, was one of the founders of RCS. Rick used his CPA and audit experience to build cost allocation and user fee spreadsheets and software that passes rigorous analysis and reporting accounting standards. Rick's work is the foundation of all the fee study work offered today. He is now semi-retired, taking only a handful of projects each year.

Proposal for Cost Allocation Plan and Citywide Fee Study Page/ 9

METHODOLOGY /PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
The City of Anderson wants to identify the full costs of all operational services that are either currently charged a fee or could be charged a fee.

RCS will first update the City's Cost Allocation Plan
(CAP), which is necessary in calculating the fully
burdened hourly rates for employees and is an
effective way to distribute the overhead costs to other funds, departments, and the end-user services. Our
Cost Allocation Plan is powerful in capturing the
maximum overhead charges to enterprise funds. If
excluded from this Citywide Fee Study, RCS will use
the City's prior Cost Allocation Plan.

Next, RCS will perform the fee study, reviewing the
staff time and program costs involved with each
service and calculating the full cost of services for each fee.

The proposed fee structure will recover these costs in the most equitable and efficient way possible. The user fees will represent how operations are conducted in the City, and may involve flat fees, deposits, valuation-based fees, step-increase fees, or a combination of these.

The eventual fee recommendations included in the final report and master fee resolution will be defensible, easy to understand, and be supported by City staff.

The most important part of our work is performed through a series of focused meetings with staff. Scheduled meetings commit staff to the timeline and ensure that our study draws from the most knowledgeable person on the subject matter. A series of meetings also gives City staff time to digest and reflect on the information generated. RCS uses only company principals with more than 25-plus years of experience to conduct these meetings, which makes the process quicker and the results more accurate. Our process provides the City with well-documented and defensible service costs that will be used to develop fees that comply with Propositions 4, 218 and 26.

We also identify 100% of the staff time on 100% of the services they provide. This gives City staff a complete perspective on their time allocations instead of merely looking at time allocations for individual services in a vacuum. These methods will ensure that City staff feels confident about the data and, therefore, confident in supporting the results in public hearings.

The other key result of identifying 100% of City services is that we are identifying not only the cost of fee services, but of community-supported services, such as public safety, street and park maintenance services. This allows us to have a real discussion with real numbers with the City Council about tax subsidy policy. Since we are identifying the full costs of fee services, we are also identifying the current subsidy of general tax dollars for these services.

Therefore, we can show the City Council how much fee services are subsidized at the expense Proposal for Cost A/location Plan and Citywide Fee Study Page/ 10
of community-supported services. Does the City want to continue to use precious tax dollars to support, for instance, a bathroom remodel and permitting inspection that only benefits a particular property owner or use those tax dollars on things that can only be supported by tax dollars, like police patrol and park maintenance? They will now have that information to be able to make that conscious choice.

Changing the discussion from fee increases to tax subsidy policy along with RCS' experience in successfully presenting the results of similar studies to City Councils ensures that the City will be able to meet its policy objectives.

RCS will provide the City of Anderson with the requested printed and electronic copies of the final versions of the Cost of Services Study and Cost Allocation Plan, including related schedules and cost documentation in a format that can be edited and updated by City staff to accommodate desired changes.

In the past five years, there have been no previous failures or refusals to complete a contract.

RCS makes it a point to follow through on tasks and establish clear lines of communication.

By maintaining open communication and being flexible with any challenges that come up, RCS aims to display our dedication to completing every contract we take.

Project Kick-Off
Task 1: Prepare City Data
RCS will review and prepare necessary files for the project. This includes obtaining and reviewing prior user fee reports and fee schedules, line-item budget details, salary schedules, MOUs and fringe benefit details.

Task 2: Kick-off Meeting
RCS will conduct a Citywide meeting, explaining the operational methodology of the study and the role of staff. We will review any possible issues that may arise as well as answer any questions from staff about the process. This meeting is crucial for the process as we want to ensure that everyone understands the various steps in the process and what is expected of them.

Cost Allocation Plan
Task 1: Identify Central Services and Allocate Staff Time RCS will meet with various departments to identify and review central services and allocate staff time and costs for those services. Examples of central services include payroll, risk management, and facility maintenance. City staff time involved in the meetings would be approximately 1-2 hours per central service department.

Proposal for Cost Allocation Plan and Citywide Fee Study Page/ 11
Task 2: Develop Allocation Factors
RCS will meet with City staff to develop the allocation factors for each central service identified in the above task. These factors will form the basis for determining fully burdened hourly rates and allocating central service costs. This meeting will be concurrent with the time allocation meeting. Though City staff involvement in data gathering is a function of the availability of the required information, RCS will develop allocation factors that are easily reproducible from year to year but still equitably allocate central service costs. RCS will calculate allocations to the functional centers and review the results with the managers of the various central service departments.

City staff time to review the results of the allocations will be less than 1 hour per department.

Task 3: Prepare and Review Draft Cost Allocation Plan with City RCS will prepare a Draft Report with allocations to end user departments using our 20-step allocation model. RCS will review this Draft Report with the City's management, making any necessary adjustments to ensure that costs are allocated properly.

Task 4: Prepare Final Cost Allocation Plan
RCS will then prepare a Final Report with allocations to end user departments. These results will be used for the general overhead component of the Fee Study and can also be used to determine the amounts for transfers to the General Fund for support provided to other funds. RCS will provide the City's requested number of printed copies, as well as a PDF file of the Overhead Cost Allocation Study. RCS will also provide a computer-based model for adjusting these fees and charges for the City's current and future needs, providing an electronic copy of the final study that can be edited and updated as needed. RCS will consult with City Staff as necessary to defend the cost allocation plan in the event of audits or other challenges.

Proposal for Cost Allocation Plan and Citywide Fee Study Page/ 12
User Fee Study
Task 1: Review the Service List with Staff
RCS will review the service list through meetings with City staff. We will also work with Departmental staff to determine any changes to the fee calculation methods. The end result, whichever method is used, will be a fee structure that best fits the City going forward. While this list will change during the course of the Study as it is refined, it will be the initial basis from where we start. City staff time for this review will be approximately 1 hour per department.

Task 2: Staff Time/Contract Cost Allocations
RCS will interview personnel providing end-user services to ensure that costs from all functional areas directly involved with a service are included in the cost of that service. This component will form the bulk of the time spent by staff. There will be two to four meetings with supervisory level staff in each functional area to create and verify the amount of time spent by staff on the services identified in the task above.

We do not ask City staff to do our job by filling out forms detailing how they spend their time. This interactive process, and the fact that we allocate 100% of all departmental staff, ensures that the information being generated is valid and reliable.

Total time commitment per department varies from 2-20 hours, through a series of working meetings.

Task 3: Develop Fully Burdened Hourly Rates
RCS will develop a fully burdened hourly rate for each City employee, including salaries and benefits, miscellaneous operating services and supply costs, citywide overhead and departmental overhead.

Task 4: Prepare Draft Report
RCS will prepare a Draft Report that identifies the total costs for each service, along with current fees, and makes fee recommendations for each service presented as well potential new fees for services the City provides but does not charge for. Service costs will be compared with existing recovery levels. RCS will review this report with the departments so that each will have input on the fees presented in the Final Report.

City staff time would be approximately 1-2 hours per department for those departments that have fee services.

Task 5: Prepare Final Report
Based on staff input, RCS will prepare a Final Report, which will have recommendations for new fees, subsidy percentages and revenue projections from those fees. The Report will include text and summary tables that will clearly explain the results and the context. All recommended fees will comply with Propositions 4, Proposal for Cost Allocation Plan and Citywide Fee Study Page/ 13
218, 26 and any other applicable laws. RCS will provide the requested number of copies and a Microsoft Word and PDF file of the Final Report. Any Master Fee Schedule revisions will also be made available in Word, Excel and/or PDF formats.

RCS will provide a computer-based model for adjusting these fees and charges for the City's current and future needs, providing an electronic copy of the final study that can be edited and updated as the need arises and allowing for the requirements referred to in the City's RFP. RCS will consult with staff as needed to defend the fee study in the event of audits or other challenges.

Task 6: Survey Similar Municipalities
RCS will survey other municipalities and document the findings. The survey summary would compare similar fees for services at different cities, however our results cannot explain why the fees differ.

Task 7: Present Report to the City Council
RCS will assist City staff, the City Council and any Committee in the review and adoption of revised service fees and subsidy percentages, at up to three public meetings. RCS will assist City staff in the implementation of the revised service fees.

Proposal for Cost Allocation Plan and Citywide Fee Study Page/ 14

PROJECT TIMELINE
RCS is available to begin work immediately with the proposed schedule outlined below. This schedule, of course, will require the cooperative participation of City staff.

Review of Central Services Time
Review Allocation Factors
Review Draft Cost Allocation Plan
Pre are Final Cost Allocation Plan
Review Service List
Review Staff Time Alloca •
Month
1 Month
2 Month
3 Month
4 ONSITE MEETINGS AND VIDEO CONFERENCING MEETINGS
Month
5 RCS will utilize our Zoom account, or any video conferencing platform of the City's choosing, to facilitate all working meetings. Our experience has determined that the use of video conferencing is more flexible in scheduling meetings, permitting City staff to quickly access reports and files on their computers, and allowing everyone to view and discuss the same documents at the same time. Department meetings will be 30 minutes to two hours each.

We would be on-site to present the report at all City Council meetings.

CLIENT INPUT
RCS will make every effort to advise, seek input from and, in general, explain the work as it is being performed. For a project to be completed successfully, we depend on dedicated and engaged staff participation. Most of the staff participation is to attend working meetings with RCS. There will be no "homework" to be completed and returned to us.

The City should also designate a Project Coordinator for the fee study who will:
1) Identify key City staff and coordinate the kick-off meeting(s) 2) Assist in obtaining requested information
3) Coordinate the review of draft reports, and
• 4) Provide project direction if needed
Proposal for Cost Allocation Plan and Citywide Fee Study Page/ 15

REFERENCES
City of Corning
: Contact
rant Mesker
530) 824-7029
Title
City Manager
bmesker@cornin~.or~
RCS completed a Cost Allocation Plan and Comprehensive Fee Study for the City in 2023, and the City Council adopted the suggested user fees in 2024.

I City ofBeamnont
I
Jennifer Ustation
(951) 572-3236
Finance Director
justat;[email protected]
RCS completed a Cost Allocation Plan and Comprehensive Fee Study for the City in 2023, and the City Council adopted the suggested user fees in 2023.

I City of El Segundo 1
Paul Chung
(310) 524-2318
Finance Director
[email protected]
RCS developed a Cost Allocation Plan most recently in 2023 and Comprehensive Fee Study for the City most recently in 2022 and has been providing these services for the City since 2008.

City of Lompoc Christie Donnelly
(805) 875-8274
Management Services Director
C [email protected],us
RCS assisted the City of Lompoc update their Impact Fees in 2018, and most recently updated their User Fees in 2022, and the City Council adopted the suggested fees in 2023. ------------
City of Long Beach Geraldine Alejo
(562) 570-5478
Revenue Management Officer
Gerald [email protected]
RCS was selected in 2019 to perform a five-year comprehensive update of Long Beach's 2,850 fees, fines and permits. We have completed the first three phases with ensuing Council approvals, and we are completing the final phase currently.

City of Santa Clarita l Carmen Magana
I (661) 255-4997
Admin Services Director
[email protected]
RCS developed a Cost Allocation Plan and Comprehensive Fee Study for the City most recently in 2025 and has been providing these services for the City since 1995.

Proposal for Cost Allocation Plan and Citywide Fee Study Page I 16

COST FOR SERVICES
Revenue & Cost Specialists propose the following project costs.

Task Milestones/Deliverables
.Review _C~11ti:, t Service~/Tipies 8
Develop Allocation Factors Index of Allocation Factors 10 1,750 --·-----------==•---·;;;;..;.-,..;.._~ Initial Calculation Review 2Q -3.,.fil)O Prepare Final Cost Allocation Plan Final Cost Allocation Plan 1,400 Cost Allocation Plan
r • n~ tirut.

Build Budget and Positions Schedule of Positions and Budget Develop Service List Preliminary Service List
Develo~ Staff Time Allocations Time Detail Re orts
Develop Fully Alloc. Hourly Rates Fully Alloc. Hourly Rate Reports Pre~are Draft ReP.ort -----Dra~ F
Prep_are _final Report Final Report
e • g.s_ PrEtsentations
User Fee Stud
The above proposal is based on a cost of $175 per hour. The billing rate for any additional work not covered by this proposal would be $195 per hour. Our proposal covers all costs except for the following additional costs that the City may incur:
• Meeting attendance beyond those identified in this proposal. • Out-of-pocket travel expenses to a maximum of $3,000 for on-site public hearing attendance.
• Insurance coverage beyond our basic general liability and workers compensation requiring an additional premium. RCS standard coverage includes workers compensation pursuant to state law, comprehensive liability Insurance with a combined single limit coverage of $2,000,000 and professional liability insurance with a combined coverage of $2,000,000.

RCS will submit four equal invoices plus any miscellaneous costs from the previous paragraph. The first invoice will be submitted ten days after notice to proceed. Each invoice will be due within 30 days of submission.

Proposal for Cost Allocation Plan and Citywide Fee Study Page I 17