138
include deli or beverage tasting facilities that are ancillary to the market/grocery portion of the use. Alcohol sales are allowed for off-site consumption or on-site consumption as part of the beverage tasting facility only.
1!9. Offices. This use includes businesses providing direct services to consumers (e.g., insurance companies, utility companies), professional offices (e.g., accounting, attorneys, doctors, dentists, employment, public relations), personal services (e.g., barber and beauty shops, shoe repair, tailors), and offices engaged in the production of intellectual property (e.g., advertising, architectural, computer programming, photography studios). 16¼. Retail Commercial. Stores and shops selling multiple lines of merchandise. These stores and lines of merchandise include, but are not limited to, art galleries, bakeries (all production in support of on-site sales), clothing and accessories, collectibles, department stores, drug stores, dry goods, fabrics and sewing supplies, florists and houseplant stores, furniture, home furnishings and equipment, general stores, gift shops, hardware, hobby materials, musical instruments, parts and accessories, newsstands, pet supplies, specialty shops, day spas, sporting goods and equipment, and stationery stores. Thrift stores are allowed with the issuance of a conditional use permit only. llJ. Sit-Down Restaurants. A retail business selling food and beverages prepared and/or served on the site, for on-premise consumption where most customers are served food at tables, but may include providing food for take-out. Also includes coffee houses and accessory cafeterias as part of office and industrial uses. Alcohol sales are allowed for on-site consumption only.
14. Supportive Housing. Housing with no limit on length of stay. that is occupied by the target population, and that is linked to an onsite or offsite service that assists the supportive housing resident in retaining the housing, improving their health status, and maximizing their ability to live and, when possible, work in the community as defined by California Government Code Section 65582.
15. Transitional Housing. Buildings configured as rental housing developments, but operated under program requirements that require the termination of assistance and recirculating of the assisted unit to another eligible program recipient at a predetermined future point in time that shall be no less than six months from the beginning of the assistance as defined by California Government Code Section 65582.
C. Prohibited Uses. Regardless of zoning designation, unless it is found that the use is compatible with a mixed-use development, the following uses shall be prohibited:
1. Adult-oriented business;
2. Agriculture and commercial nursery;
3. Commercial cleaning plant;
4. Boat, trailer, and vehicle (including parts} sales, service, storage and garages except along West Center and Douglas streets;
5. Camp and trailer park;
6. Car wash;
7. Drive-in/drive-through restaurants;
8. Equipment rental and sales yard;
9. Fuel dealers;
Cr eat ed : 2825- 81-08 17:38 :83 [ EST)
(Supp. No. 21)
139
10. Laundry, commercial plant;
11. Recycling center and recyclable material collection facility;
12. Service station;
13. Thrift store. Defined as a shop where more than fifty percent of the sates inventory is used articles except as provided in Section 17.15.0S0(B)ll.
14. Uses involving hazardous materials or generating high level of noise incompatible with residential uses;
15. The planning director may deem additional uses to be prohibited based on a finding that the use is similar in nature, function, and operation to the prohibited uses listed in this subsection. (Ord. 757, § 2(Exh. A), 2009; Ord. No. 767, 9-21-2010)
17.15.060 Development standards.
Development standards for development activities are intended to encourage, protect, and preserve the historic urban image of Downtown Anderson. They are also intended to improve overall aesthetic appearance and to serve as an incentive for private investment.
An important initiative of the Anderson Mixed Use District is to clearly spell out development standards that shape the desired urban form. Building intensities are regulated through conformance to the prescribed development standards and design guidelines (e.g., height, setbacks, parking, form, massing).
A. General Development Standards.
1. Mandatory Conformance. Standards listed in this Section-General Development Standards-as well as architectural and design standards listed in Section 17.070, are mandatory requirements that must be satisfied for all new projects and modifications to existing development, as follows:
a. Projects shall be reviewed for conformance with these provisions as part of design review. b. Modifications to existing development, except for minor modifications listed (as listed in [Subsection] c., below) and that only require issuance of a building permit, shall be reviewed for conformance to the standards within this chapter as part of plan check during building permit review.
c. Standards within this Chapter are not applicable to minor modifications to a structure, such as repair, restoration, or reconstruction, where such work, as determined by the Planning Director, maintains the outer dimensions and surface relationships of the existing structure (e.g., repainting, replacement of windows or doors with matching size and style, repair of exterior materials such as stucco, brick, and wood)
2. Adaptive Reuse Provisions. The following exemptions to the design standards are provided to allow the reuse of existing small scale buildings within the district:
(Supp. No. 21)
a. Within the MU·C portion of the district the following exemptions and provisions shall apply to nonconforming houses or stand-alone structures on lots seven thousand square feet or smaller:
i. Structures are exempted from the "build-to" requirements. ii. Maintenance, repair and modifications are permitted without compliance to provisions within this Chapter provided such work does not exceed fifty percent of the appraised value thereof, according to the assessor's records or current Created: 2025- 01 -08 17:30:93 [EST ]
140
appraisal of valuation of subject property. Any appraisal shall be furnished and paid for by the applicant.
iii. The design review committee shall review remodels, and expansions, unless otherwise exempted. A determination shall be made by the committee that the improvements comply with the spirit of the design standards by incorporating one or more features.
b. Within the MU-R, conversions from residential to an allowed commercial use (e.g. offices, restaurants and small shops) is subject to review and approval by the design review committee. The DRC shall review the conversion plans to ensure the character of the building is preserved while allowing for necessary commercial modifications including but not limited to Americans with Disabilities Act requirements. c. Nonconforming properties located in either the MU-C or MU-R that qualify as historic buildings or resources as defined by this code may also expand or remodel subject to review and approval by the design review committee that the historic character of the building is maintained or reestablished.
3. Area-Wide Height Requirements and Exceptions. Refer to Section 17.060.B. and Table 17-3 for district height requirements.
The approval body may approve architectural features such as tower elements, elevator service shafts, and roof access stairwells that extend above the height limit. Telecommunications antennas and service structures located on rooftops may also exceed the maximum building height but shall be hidden to the maximum extent possible using appropriate screening and "stealth" technologies.
B. Height Requirements. The maximum height is specified in Table 17-3 below and is intended to preserve the compact, walkable, historic Downtown core while simultaneously stimulating economic development in the commercial heart of the City.
TABLE 17•3; HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS
Main Street Service Street Neighborhood Avenue
Street
Maximum Height1 45' 45' 35' 45'
1. The maximum height may be Increased by twenty percent with a U$e permit.
C. Building Placement. The setbacks and build-to lines for Downtown Anderson are intended to enhance social interactions in the historic Downtown retail core while simultaneously providing appropriate levels of privacy in residential areas.
Table 17·4 and Figure 17-10 display setback requirements for each Downtown Anderson district.
TABLE 17-4: SETBACK AND "BUILD·TO" REQUIREMENTS
Building Main Street Service Neighborhood Street Avenue Placement Street MU-C MU-R MU-C MU-R
Build-To 0' N/A O' 10' 10' 15'
Front Line
*
Minimum 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0'
Side Yard
Created : 2825-81- 08 17: 30:83 I EST]
(Supp. No. 21)
141
I Minimum
Rear Yard 1
10· 115' 115' 115'
• Build-to lines are defined as the edge where the public right-of-way ends and the private property boundary begins. The line may vary from the standards specified in this table if a conflict exists with the allowed frontage type. Additional setback may be permitted to allow for outdoor seating, an entry plaza and other similar areas.
Buildings may not be setback to accommodate parking in front of building facades.
D. Frontage Types. The architectural composition of the front facade of a building, particularly concerning how it relates and ties into the surrounding public realm. The Downtown Anderson frontage types are intended to enhance social interactions in the historic Downtown retail core while simultaneously providing appropriate levels of privacy in residential areas. Allowed frontage types in the different districts and along the four street types are listed in Table 17-5 and defined below. An "X" means that the frontage type is allowed; a blank cell means that the frontage type is not allowed.
TABLE 17-5: ALLOWED FRONTAGE TYPES
Allowed Main Street Service Neighborhood Street Avenue
Frontage Street MU-C MU-R MU-C MU-R
Types
Arcade X X X X X
Gallery X X X X X
Storefront X X X X X
Stoop X X X X
Door X
Yard/Terrace
Porch X X
X
Neighborhood
Yard
Created: 2025-01·08 17: 30:03 [EST)
(Supp. No. 21)
142
(Supp. No. 21)
A RCADE
M '4 10'
• Depth "'- Ten.foot minimum from the build-to line to the inside column face. • Height "' Ten-foot minimum clear.
• Seventy•five percent-one hundred percent of the building front.
Created: 2025- 01 -08 17:30:93 (EST ]
143
j
c;
l.
(Supp. No. 21)
GALLERY
- -----·•'
M..,IQ J_ t..l ,o
LI
• Depth = Ten-foot minimum from the build-to line to the inside column face. • Height = Ten-foot minimum clear.
• Seventy-five percent-one hundred percent of the building front.
Created: 2025•01 •08 17:30: 03 (EST)
144
talU•tc. u•t'
t•t..Jll(JWfiH.t.
~ • ffl' ~uu,..~
....., _________ _
·-·--· • ·-----· I -
STOREFRONT
•• --- -·-·,
• Depth - Five-foot minimum over the sidewalk.
• Height = Eight-foot minimum clear, twelve-foot maximum. • Minimum of fifty percent of the overall building frontage.
Created: 2825-01-08 17: 30:03 (EST]
(Supp. No. 21}
145
C:
~
a.
STOOP
~t-.,\11411, lt.E:_ F+Oft.•(IY l ....
r-tt~C I.Of l . U:.J.Y.. ~ )I':
,...,, ............. --1----,
I
I
I
I
,
• Width = Three-foot minimum.
• Stoops must rise to a minimum of three feet above grade. Exceptions may be permitted to comply with ADA requirements where no other alternative exists.
Created: 2825-91-98 17: 38: 93 [EST]
(Supp. No. 21)
146
C
0 l
C:
(Cl
0:
DOOR YARD/TERRACE
~lb,l.l'(. Utt. H ·-t:+-\.H? Y IJtlR
~IE t.l}I l~·-"""°' I ----
1 I
• Width = Three-foot minimum.
• Minimum of three feet above grade. Exceptions may be permitted to comply with ADA requirements where no other alternative exists.
Cre ated : 2825-01 -08 17: 30: 03 [ EST]
(Supp. No. 21)
147
t
f ~II~
r
" • I
I
PORCH
,,._,,...., ... ,,. ~ ; tLJI I ,~ lc.M
...,_. ---- 10
M,w, Z(;)
- • 1
r.... 19·
l
I
l
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
• Depth = Six-foot minimum (clear).
• Width= Ten.foot minimum.
• Height "' Ten-foot minimum (clear).
• Porch height must be a minimum of three feet above grade. Exceptions may be permitted to comply with ADA requirements where no other alternative exists.
Created : 2025•01-08 17:30:03 [EST]
(Supp. No. 21)
148
C:
~
a..
NEIGHBORHOOD YARD
J..JQ-"t..HTY JNE.
mtv~ t.0r I P1.FJ111..-: A.-m
0 . I
MOfZ ,----i
MA,(30 I
I
I
- _____ I __ _
I
• Minimum twenty-foot setback
• Maximum thirty-foot setback
E. Building Types. The following building types are intended to provide a variety of flexible building styles appropriate for the small town character of Anderson that can be used to guide future development.
Allowed building types in the different districts and along the four street types are listed in Table 17-6 and defined below. An "X" means that the building type is allowed; a blank cell means that the building type is not allowed.
TABLE 17-6: ALLOWED BUILDING TYPES
Allowed Main Street Service Neighborhood Street Avenue
Building Street MU-C MU·R MU-C MU-R
Types
Half Block X X X X X X
Liner
Infill X X X X X X
Terraced X X X X X
Front Yard X
Housing
Rowhouse X
Courtyard X
Housing
Cre at@d: 2025- 01 -08 17:30:03 (EST)
(Supp. No. 21)
149
1, Half Block Liner. An attached building with a frontage of approximately one-third to one-half the length of a downtown block and zero side yard setbacks. It is used for mixed-use, residential, and commercial development.
')-<! l
··"' 'ij'
't} ..,:-,.._ .• 1.:,'1
;u:"-~5~'!;'
Hair Block Liner
,,:
~--·
2. Infill. An attached building with frontage that is less than one-third the length of a downtown block and zero side yard setbacks. It is used for mixed-use, residential, and commercial development.
Inf JI LOI
3. Terraced. A mixed-use, residential, or commercial building characterized by individual units that are assessed via multileveled outdoor terraces. The terraces are intended to be semi-public spaces that are extensions of the public realm.
4. Front Yard Housing. A detached building designed as a single-family residence, duplex, triplex, or quadplex. Front Yard Housing is accessed from the sidewalk adjacent to the street build-to line. (Supp. No. 21)
~
Terraced Lot
Front Yard Housing
Created: 2025-01• 08 17:30:03 (EST]
150
S. Rowhouse. Two or more detached two- or three-story dwellings with zero side yard setbacks. A rowhouse may be used for nonresidential purposes.
Rowhouse
6. Courtyard Housing. A group of dwelling units arranged to share one or more common courtyards on a qualifying lot in any zone. Dwellings take access from the street or the courtyard(s). Dwelling configuration occurs as town houses, apartments, or apartments located over or under town houses. The courtyard is intended to be a semi-public space that is an extension of the public realm.
Courtyard Housing
f . Residential Standards When Part of Mixed-Use Development. The residential component of a mixeduse development may be located wholly within an existing commercial building or in an entirely new structure. The following requirements apply:
1. To provide adequate privacy and security, residential entrances may be grade-separated or placed in the quieter areas away from the main commercial portions.
2. Access to residential use shall be clearly delineated.
3. Access to open space areas, either public or private, shall be provided when available.
4. When in a mixed configuration, residential uses should be located on the upper stories or on ground floors when they do not use storefront space. Residential uses may occupy, on a temporary basis, the ground floor of a building located on commercial street frontage, but the ground floor shall be designed to accommodate future commercial use.
5. Units of various sizes (e.g., studios, one- and two-bedroom units) are encouraged.
6. Open space shall be required regardless if the residential use is located in an existing, expanded, or new structure:
Created: 2825• 81•08 17 :)8:8) [EST]
(Supp. No. 21)
151
a. The amount of open space shall be governed by the standards of the residential zoning most similar in nature and function to the proposed residential portion of the mixed-use development. However, the amount may be reduced based on the anticipated needs of the future tenants and the quality, usefulness, and/or amenities within the spaces provided. b. On-site open space may include, but is not limited to, pedestrian walkways, plaza areas, landscape areas, roof gardens, terraces, and other creative spaces which may be used either visually, actively, or passively by the residents within the development. c. Public open space such as parks, plazas, public recreational facilities, and other similar facilities located within one-quarter mile may be counted toward the open space requirement for the mixed-use development.
G. Storefront Regulations. The following storefront standards are intended to provide continuity of building form at street level in Downtown Anderson. Additionally, standards are meant to enhance the relationship between buildings and the sidewalk, subsequently encouraging more pedestrian activity.
Table 17-7 lists the storefront design standards. "Tags" refer to those elements labeled in Figure 17-11 and described below (Storefront Design Standard Definitions).
TABLE 17-7: STOREFRONT DESIGN STANDARDS
Storefront Main Street Service Neighborhood Street Avenue Standards Street MU-C MU-R MU-C MU-R
Storefront 10'-40' 20'-50' 15'-35' 15'-35' 20'-50' 20'-60' Width
Tag "a"
Ground 12'-18' 12'-18' 10'-15' 10'-15' 12'-20' 12'-20'
Floor Height
Tag "b"
Bulkhead 1.5'-3' 1.5'-3' 1.5'-3' 1.5'-3' 0'-4' 0'-4'
Height
Tag "c"
Inset of 3'-7' 3'-7' 2'-6' 2'-6' 2'-5' 2'-5'
Front Door
from Buildto Line
Tag "d"
Maximum 6' 6' 4' 4' 6' 6'
Awning
Extension
from
Building
Tag "e"
H. Storefront Design Standard Definitions.
1. Storefront Width. The front facade width as measured from one corner of t he front facade to the other.
Created: 2025-01-08 17 :30:03 [ EST]
(Supp. No. 21)
152
l
2. Ground Floor Height. The height of the front facade's first story as measured from the sidewalk level to the top of the expression line. An expression line is an architectural embellishment that delineates the end of the ground floor and the start of the second floor of a building.
3. Bulkhead Height. The height of the bulkhead which is the portion of a commercial facade located between the ground and the bottom of the street level display windows. It is typically constructed of stone, brick, or concrete.
4. Inset of Front Door from Build• To line. The distance from the front door of the building to the build-to line. A build•to line is an urban setback dimension that delineates the maximum distance from the property line a front building facade can be placed. Typically, build•to lines range from zero to ten feet. See Table 17•7 for build-to line regulations in Downtown Anderson.
5. Maximum Awning Extension from Building. The maximum distance allowed between the building and the end of a fully extended awning. An awning is a temporary shelter that is supported from the exterior wafl of a building. It is typically constructed of canvas or a similar fabric that is sturdy and flexible.
In,, I ,,fl '""I I lt''-"
C) 11,,,11' lh11i1I• h, I 1n,·
Cl \ l,1:,. "'"'" '" 11 11111
I ',;h'lblHll fr,1111 J, 111f;IHll' FIGURE 17•11: STOREFRONT DESIGN STANDARDS - c · .. :-=> ~
----~...r.--
B I - - ~.·•-
- ----·- • - .. . - :J/ tli~ U I I
= I I
··-
I l~-=->
L- C) I
~-- ·:.:r---..- I
r= r ! J'--r -· --, l.~_I --·' •• - ...
- - . ·- - -· . -·· ,i
I tflfl • 11 t: . ;J I.I II:..! U LI
I I I • 1-~
l
l
I •
-
. :•,. .. , ,, '"~ . ... 1i,,1 ◄
... .,. ,,\_ .-. I
.\•., ...... ,
,,:.,;.;•.· ,., )1'•
, ....... , , ..
U ·'
1~!
~ar I I r=:3:_ I I t
0 Created: 2825-81-88 17: 38: 03 [EST ]
(Supp. No. 21}
153
6. Entry Plazas and Seating Areas. Downtown stores are encouraged to integrate outdoor seating and entry plazas into the design of buildings. The building facades may be setback from the buildto line to accommodate outdoor seating and/or plazas. Storefront windows and doors shall be used to ensure that a visual connection is maintained between the outdoor and indoor areas of the use.
FIGUR& 17-12: OUTDOOR SEATING ANO/ OR PLAZA AREA
;~
,,vi-,.. .. ,.,_ • .,_ ... ~t "N>'~ ll-,-"t!-""" N•.,
, Jl)a 11' ~·, , ~ ........ l 1#',;'Ja, IJ(H,_ldf'A ,._, ••~ I. Parking. Parking requirements have been reduced to encourage pedestrian activity and economic growth in Downtown Anderson. In the design of parking facilities, consideration should be given to locating parking in the back or at the sides of buildings in order to maintain a continuous retail facade for pedestrians along downtown streets.
1. Allowable Parking Types. Allowable parking types listed in Table 17-8 and defined below. An "A" means that the parking type is allowed; a "P" means that the parking type is preferred and highly encouraged. An "N" means that the parking type is not allowed.
TABLE 17-8: PARKING
Allowed Main Street Service Neighborhood Street Avenue
Parking Street MU-C MU~R MU-C MU-R
Types
Surface p A A A p A
ParkingBehind
Building
Surface N A A N A A
ParkingNext to
Building
Alley Access A A p p A A
Parking A A N N N N
Structure
Tucked N N N A A A
Under
Building
Created: 2925-01 -08 17 :39:93 [EST ]
(Supp. No. 21)
154
Commercial
Office
Residential
N-Not permitted
A-Allowed
None
required
None
required
N/A
Allowed Parking Ratios
None None required 1 sp/400 sf
required
None None required 1 sp/500 sf
required
1/du 1/du 1.5/du
P- Preferred and highly encouraged.
FIGURE 17-13: PARKING TYPES
2. Parking Standards.
(Supp. No. 21)
a. Downtown Anderson encourages "one•stop" parking where shoppers park once and visit multiple stores on foot. On-street parking is encouraged and along certain streets may serve as the only parking for a use. Shared parking lots are encouraged.
Created: 2025•01•08 17 :30:03 [EST]
155
b. Locating parking lots between the front property line and the building store front is prohibited. Instead, off-street parking should be located to the rear of buildings. Street parking should be available whenever possible in front of retail stores. c. When off-street parking in the rear is not possible, the visual impact of headlight bleed and the asphalt parking surface shall be minimized by landscaped berms and/or walls with a maximum height of 3 feet.
d. Rear parking lots should be designed and located contiguously, or adjacent to alleys, so that vehicles can travel from one private parking lot to the other either directly or via an alley without having to enter a street. This may be achieved with reciprocal shared access agreements.
e. Locate rear parking lots or structure entries on side streets or alleys in order to minimize pedestrian/vehicular conflicts.
f. Create wide, well-lit, landscaped pedestrian walkways connecting on-site pedestrian circulation systems in parking lots to off-site public sidewalks and building entries. g. In order to minimize conflicting vehicle turning movement along major roadways, the City encourages shared access drives within and between integrated nonresidential development. This reduces the number of driveway curb cuts. The City also encourages reciprocal access between non-residential developments to provide for convenience, safety, and efficient circulation. If incorporated, a reciprocal access agreement shall be recorded with the land by the owners of abutting properties to ensure shared access will be preserved over time.
h. The layout of parking areas should be designed so that pedestrians walk parallel to moving cars.
i. Parking areas that accommodate a significant number of vehicles should be divided into a series of connected smaller lots. Landscaping and offsetting portions of the lot are effective in reducing the visual impact of larger parking areas.
j. Demarcation of parking spaces should be legible, and the spaces should be adequate but not overly generous.
k. Parking structures (privately owned and operated) are encouraged to incorporate retail and/or office space on the street level of the structure. This prevents the structure from becoming a pedestrian ''dead zone" in Downtown Anderson.
J. Signs. The following sign standards are intended to encourage creative sign design as an integral part of a building's architecture, rather than treating signs as an add-on or afterthought. Additionally, stimulating retail and wayfinding signage in Downtown Anderson will increase economic activity and city legibility. While this Section addresses permanent signage within the Downtown, additional provisions for temporary signs, prohibited signs, and other general provisions may be found in Chapter
17.44 (Comprehensive Sign Ordinance).
1. Relation to Other City Sign Regulations. Where conflicts exist between this Section and Chapter
17.44 (Comprehensive Sign Ordinance), provisions within this Section shall prevail.
2. Allowed Sign Types. Allowed types of signs are listed in Table 17-9 by street type and zone. An "A" means that the sign type is allowed; a "P" means that the sign type is preferred and highly encouraged. An "N" means that the sign type is not allowed.
TABLE 17-9: ALLOWABLE SIGN TYPES
Created: 2025-01- 08 17:30: 03 (EST!
(Supp. No. 21)
156
Allowed Main Street Service Neighborhood Street
Sign Types Street MU-C MU-R
Wall Sign A A A A
Awning Sign A A A A
Window pl p p A
Sign
Canopy Sign A A A A
Projecting p p p A
Sign
Monument N N N N
Sign
Figurative p p N N
Sign
A-Frame A A N N
Sidewalk
Sign2
Temporary A A A A
Signs
Business A A A A
Directional
Sign
Notes:
1. Monument signs allowed only if landscaped and shared by two or more businesses.
2. A•frame s;gns permitted only if they do not interfere with the pede~trian right-of•way.
N- Not permitted
A-Allowed
P- Preferred and highly encouraged.
(Supp. No. 21}
Avenue
MU-C MU-R
p p
A A
A A
N N
N N
p2 A2
A A
N N
A A
A A
Created: 202S-01·08 17: 30:03 ( EST]
157
FIGURE 17-14: SIGN TYPES
A1•. •rp
,,, .... l ,u.:
7 w .. 11 -·~· wiUt ..tt. , H I k d XYZ Building------- Sl' COi1!1 llwr
~tWrnU<J 1i1JII\
Selon~ floor
t111ioow 1iqn1
.. • W;\11.io,,
cl~V llll'I lrll N\ --·--- "1"1flll<l S Ollle )il (? .,. ; DIIK11)fy SIQn
L
3. Sign Size and Number. Consistent with the standards of Chapter 17.44 (Comprehensive Sign Ordinance), the maximum allowed number and size for signs in downtown shall be as follows:
(Supp. No. 21)
a. Freestanding Sign. One freestanding identification sign per site allowing one-quarter foot of sign area per foot of lot frontage on which the sign is to be located, not to exceed twenty square feet in area nor six feet in height on a site where all buildings are set back at least ten feet from the street curb or street pavement edge on which the use fronts. Where the subject property exceeds one acre in slze, the maximum sign area may be increased to forty square feet and height to ten feet.
b. Wall Sign. One wall sign per building frontage. Maximum wall sign area is determined as follows, not to exceed one hundred square feet:
i. For buildings with only one building frontage: One-half square foot of sign area for each ground-level linear foot of building frontage. ii. For buildings with multiple building frontages: One-half square foot of sign area for each ground-level linear foot of one building frontage and one-quarter square foot of sign area for each linear foot of additional frontage. The basic sign area in a multitenant center may be reallocated between businesses by the center manager based on an overall sign plan for the center. c. Marquee Sign. One marquee sign per building occupant which does not exceed five square feet in area or is located lower than seven and one-half [feet] above the grade level below it. No sign may be placed upon the roof of a marquee.
d. Projecting Signs. One projecting sign per building, not to exceed four-tenths square feet for every linear foot of main entrance facade frontage, not to exceed a maximum of twenty square feet. A projecting sign shall be at least eight feet above grade directly below the sign.
e. Multistory Building Directory Sign. One directory wall sign for each primary building entry to identify occupants in a multistory building. The sign may not exceed five square feet in area.
Created : 2025-01- 08 17:30:~~ [E5T)
158
f. A-Frame Signs. One freestanding A-frame sign not exceeding an area of four square feet and three feet in height per establishment.
3. Sign Design. Design, color, materials, size, and placement are all important in creating signs that are architecturally attractive and integrated into the overall site design. Signs that are compatible with the surroundings and effectively communicate a message will promote a quality visual environment. The standards that follow address these issues and others; the standards are intended to help business owners provide quality signs that add to and support the character of Downtown Anderson.
(Supp. No. 21)
a. General Design Standards.
i. Design signs in harmony with the style and character of the development and as an integral design component of the building architecture, building materials, landscaping, and overall site development.
ii. Sign letters and materials should be professionally designed and fabricated. iii. Exposed conduit and tubing (raceway) is prohibited. All transformers and other equipment shall be concealed.
iv. All signs shall be maintained in good repair, including the display surface, which shall be kept neatly painted or posted.
v. The exposed back of all signs visible to the public shall be suitably finished and maintained.
vi. The use of retractable awnings as a signage tool is acceptable. b. Placement.
i. Signs should be generally free of obstructions when viewed from different angles. However, trees or other landscaping that grow to a point that it obstructs the view of a sign or makes it illegible shall not be grounds for removal or trimming of the plant(s).
ii. Utilize a consistent proportion of signage to building scale, such as one-third text to two-thirds wall area or one&fourth text to three-fourths wall area. See Figure 17-15 (Text Scale).
Created: 2025- 01-08 17:30:03 [EST]
159
FIGURE 17•15: TEXT SCALE
-- -.. ------------- .. ----- ½ Wall Area . ½Sign
-------.. ---
______ Q _____________
------ -~l}R~~-~~? __
½ Wall Area ~ ·----- - - - ------- - -- - I
- - )
- = - - - ----
c. Materials.
i. Paper and cloth signs are appropriate for interior temporary use only and are not permitted on the exterior of a building.
ii. The use of neon is permitted if it fits with the style of the architecture (e.g., art deco) and is not a nuisance (e.g., produces glare) to the surrounding properties.
Exterior matenals, r,rnshes und
colors should be the saflle o,
similar lo Ihose of the building or
structures on sI1e
Sign Tips: Colors and Materials
-Use exterior materials, finishes, and colors in harmony with, or an upgrade to, those of the buildings or structures on site.
-The selected materials need to contribute to the legibility of the sign. For example, glossy finishes are often difficult to read because of glare and reflections.
-Contrast is an important influence on the legibility of signs. Light letters on a dark background or dark letters on a light background are most legible.
-Limit the total number of colors used in any one sign. Small accents of several colors may make a sign unique and attractive, but the competition between large areas of many different colors decreases readability. (Supp. No. 21)
d. Sign legibility.
i. Avoid spacing letters and words too close together. Crowding of letters, words, or lines will make any sign more difficult to read. Conversely, over-spacing Created: 2en -8'l •e3 17 :38 :83 (EST]
160
these elements causes the viewer to read each item individually, again obscuring the message. As a general rule, letters should not occupy more than 75 percent of the sign panel area.
. .
,·.
~,:\}:;·_~~~
'>-- ~-·-"'-~'<?
·.OEH ~ ;-• . .. ... -
A brief messa9<1 W•lh simple laUenng ,s
easy to read and identily
Sign Tips: Legibility
- Use a brief message whenever possible. Fewer words help produce a more effective sign. A sign with a brief, succinct message is easier to read and looks more attractive. -limit the number of lettering styles in order to increase legibility. A general rule to follow is to limit the number of different letter types to no more than two for small signs and three for large signs. - Use symbols and logos in the place of words whenever appropriate. Pictographic images will usually register more quickly in the viewer's mind than a written message. - Avoid hard-to-read, overly intricate typefaces and symbols. Typefaces and symbols that are hard to read reduce the sign's ability to communicate.
(Supp. No. 21)
e. Sign Illumination.
L ,g~t source musl be dir~ te<l
against lhe sign such that ,1
does nol shine inlo odjoconl
property or cause glare 1or
molor,sts and pedestrians
I. The light from an illuminated sign shall not be of an intensity or brightness that will create glare or other negative impact on residential properties in direct line of sight to the sign.
ii. Whenever indirect lighting fixtures are used (fluorescent or incandescent), care shall be taken to properly shield the light source to prevent glare from spilling over into residential areas and any public right-of-way. iit. Reserved.
Created: 2025-01-08 17:30:03 [EST)
161
iv. Reserved.
v. Internally illuminated plastic box "canned" signs are prohibited. Individually illuminated channel letters are acceptable.
vi. Signs shall not have blinking, flashing, or fluttering lights, or other illumination devices that have a changing light intensity, brightness, or color. vii. Light sources shall utilize energy-efficient fixtures to the greatest extent possible and shall comply with Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations (California Building Standards Code).
fll Pl I l J ii•' • Ill . .-· I ~
Spotlights are preferred for wall
and projecting signs.
Sign Tips: Illumination
- If the sign can be illuminated by an indirect source of light, this is usually the best arrangement because the sign will appear to be better integrated with the building's architecture. Light fixtures attached to the front of the structure cast light on the sign and the face of the structure as well. -Individually illuminated letters should be backfill. Signs composed of individual letters mounted directly on a structure can often use a distinctive element of the structure's facade as a backdrop, thereby providing a better integration of the sign with the structure.
K. Landscaping. Landscaping in Downtown Anderson should be pedestrian-oriented and reflect and enhance the area's small town charm. These provisions emphasize the use of potted plants, trees, and landscaping along urban streetscapes and within urban parking lots. Landscaping shall be provided onsite consistent with the standards set forth below.
1. Landscaping Standards.
(Supp. No. 21)
a. Street Trees. Street trees shall be provided every thirty feet on center within the required landscape area. Tree selection shall be from the city's adopted street tree list and to the satisfaction of the planning director.
Tree c.;in0p1es •n pafl<log lots pNIYlde
Shade
b. Standard Design Concepts.
Created: 2~s-e1-ea 17 :38:93 [ ESTI
162
(Supp. No. 21)
i. Use landscaping to complement the architecture, to minimize the impact of incompatible land uses, and to establish a transition between adjacent developments. Plant materials can absorb sound, filter air, curtail erosion, provide shade, and maintain privacy.
ii. Provide landscaping to break up blank walls, shade pedestrians, accent entries, and soften the connection of paving for vehicles to buildings. iii. Landscaping strips (or bulb-outs) on public streets should be wide enough for canopy shade that is consistent with the street width. See standards for landscape area width in Section 17.040.
iv. The use of alternative types of landscaping strip ground cover is strongly encouraged. Standard grass strip is discouraged.
v. Parking facilities shall attain a minimum of fifty percent tree canopy coverage within ten years of completion of construction to provide shade and minimize visual and environmental impacts.
vi. In surface parking lots, trees should be installed at a ratio of one tree per three parking stalls for the perimeter of the parking lot and one tree per six spaces for the interior of the parking lot.
vii. Consider placement of trees and shrubs to avoid conflict with vehicular overhangs, traffic and visibility patterns, and on-site structures. viii. Owners of vacant lots without any structures shall seed the lot(s) on a regular basis and mow a minimum of once a season to eliminate fire danger or as necessary to present a clean and tidy appearance.
ix. Owners of vacant lots that contain structures shall maintain the existing landscaping on a regular basis so that the lot(s) should not give an overgrown appearance.
x. Landscape should be oriented in accord with the demands of the species for sunlight and its susceptibility to the prevailing wind. c. Irrigation. Irrigation of landscaping shall only be directed onto the landscaping. Spillover onto hardscape shall be minimized to the maximum extent feasible. d. Tree Grates/Guards.
i. Tree grates should be utilized at passages to provide a continuous walking surface while providing adequate space for the tree to grow. ii. Install structural soil systems to direct new root growth downward below hardscape areas, which helps to postpone root damage caused to the surrounding hardscape and structures. By providing deep watering and air to root systems as appropriate when trees are planted within five feet of any permanent structure/paving/curb, additional service life may be achieved.
Structural soil systems are preferred over root barriers as they are often more effective.
iii. A minimum of six feet of structural soil shall be provided for trees. The area of enhanced root zone environment shall be enlarged beyond this minimum according to the species size planted. The structural soil can be provided under tree grates and pavement.
Created: 2825 -01- 08 17: 30 :03 [EST]
163
(Supp. No. 21)
iv. Trees and landscaping installed in parking lots should be protected from vehicle damage by a minimum six-inch-tall concrete curb surrounding the planter area.
Planter barriers to protect landscaping should also be designed with intermittent curb cuts to allow parking lot runoff to drain into landscape areas. e. Pots and Planters.
Hanging baskets beaulify the
Downtown,
i. Boxed and container plants in decorative planters of ceramic, terracotta, wood, metal, or stucco should be used to enhance public areas. ii. Large planters may also be incorporated into seating areas. Such planters should be open to the earth below and be provided with a permanent irrigation system.
iii. Hanging flower baskets enhance the beauty of the Downtown. lamp posts should include supports and irrigation systems for hanging flower baskets.
Flower baskets may atso hang from buildings, such as on arcades, galleries, porches, and other frontage types, provided that supports are architecturally consistent with the building and irrigation systems are included . . :,~-
r., 1,,j.... \ ~, ! 'j ~ ) 1.:J·. ?, -:,· "'~r~·.~r
A small bioswule along lhe
edge of a pc1rk111g area
~ ~ ~-
; I
t
..
; '
~
f. Water Quality and Urban Runoff. Because of the proximity of the downtown to natural riparian areas and the potential impact of urban activities on the natural environment, water quality and urban runoff in the downtown is of particular concern. The use of bioswales and landscaped water quality basins represents the preferred approach to urban runoff and stormwater quality control throughout downtown, particularly in the MU-R zone. Such features add aesthetic character, utilize natural materials, and serve as a functional element that allows for stormwater management.
Created : 2025•01• 98 17:30 :ln (EST)
164
(Ord. 757, § 2(Exh. A), 2009)
i. Bioswales and similar natural landscaped runoff control facilities shall be used to enhance appearance of stormwater management methods and allow for groundwater recharge.
ii. Bioswales shall be used to collect surface runoff before it crosses pavement areas and to reduce ponding and damage to walkways. Bioswales shall be graded to direct water away from paved areas into detention basins. iii. Bioswales shall utilize a slope that is steep enough to prevent ponding and shallow enough to slow water velocity. Soils must not readily drain water; the goal is to get cleaner water to flow downstream. Recommended slopes of one to four percent should be used. Flow should be sufficiently low enough to provide adequate residence time within the channel. Flow depth should not be taller than the vegetation (a maximum depth of four inches is recommended).
Final design of bioswales shall be subject to approval of the City Engineer.
17.15.070 Special use regulations and other standards.
The purpose of the following special use regulations is to address concerns and provide standards for the following types of development and issues specific to Downtown Anderson. These standards should ensure consistency with the vision and goals defined in this Zoning Code and the General Plan by providing guidance to planners, developers, and residents on these unique topics.
A. Live/Work. Live/work units are built spaces that function predominantly as work spaces and secondarily as residences.
Live/work units are permitted in buildings through a conditional use permit which demonstrates compliance with the following standards:
1. The unit must contain a cooking space and bathroom in conformance with applicable building standards.
2. Adequate and clearly defined working space must constitute no less than fifty percent of the gross floor area of the live/work unit. Said working space shall be reserved for and regularly used by one or more persons residing there.
3. At least one residence in each live/work unit shall maintain at alt times a valid city business license for a business on the premises.
4. Persons who do not reside in the live/work unit may be employed in a live/work unit when the required parking is provided.
5. Customer and client visits are allowed when the required parking is provided.
6. No portion of a live/work unit may be separately rented or sold as a commercial space for a person or persons not living on the premises, or as a residential space for a person or persons not working on the premises.
B. Newspaper Racks. For the purpose of this section, "newspaper rack" is defined as any type of unattended device placed upon or abutting any public right-of-way for the vending, display, or free distribution of newspapers, news periodicals, or other written materials.
1. Permission to install a newspaper rack requires an encroachment permit from the City of Anderson.
Created: 2825·81·08 17:30:03 (EST)
(Supp. No. 21)
165
2. No person shall place, erect, install, service, stock, or maintain any newspaper rack or courtesy bench which obstructs or intrudes upon, in whole or in part, any public right-of-way. A minimum of four feet of clear walkway must be maintained.
3. Newspaper racks shall not be located directly in front of a building entrance.
4. Newspaper racks may not be anchored to a light pole, street sign, or other similar street element.
5. Any vendor choosing to distribute free publications in Downtown Anderson shall obtain prior approval from the City prior to installation.
C. Public Art. For the purpose of this section, "public art" in Downtown Anderson is defined as permanent or temporary works of art in the public realm, whether part of a building or freestanding. Public art shall not include any form of commercial advertising.
1. Public art shall be incorporated into public plazas, parks, and municipal buildings. Additionally, the incorporation of public art into private development projects is strongly encouraged.
2. Possible types of public art include but are not limited to the following options:
(Supp. No. 21)
a. Building features and enhancements such as bike racks, gates, benches, water features, or shade screens, which are unique and/or produced in limited editions by a professional artist.
b. Landscape art enhancements such as walkways, bridges, or art features within a garden. c. Murals or mosaics covering walls, floors, and walkways. Murals may be painted or constructed with a variety of materials, including the use of imbedded and nontraditional materials.
d. Sculptures, which can be freestanding, wall-supported or suspended, kinetic, electronic, and made of endurable materials suitable for the site.
e. Fiberwork, neon, or glass artworks, photographs, prints, and any combination of media including sound, film, and video systems, or other interdisciplinary artwork applicable to the site.
f. Community arts projects resulting in tangible artwork, such as community murals, sculpt ures, or kiosks.
Created: 2025-01-08 17:30:03 (EST]
166
Appropriately mwnta,nod ~tore fronts
0. Storefront Vacancy. For the purpose of this Section, a "storefront vacancy" in Downtown Anderson is defined as a vacant commercial ground floor (street.level) space in any otherwise occupied or unoccupied building.
1. Vacant storefronts shall be properly locked and secured to prevent unauthorized trespassing during the period of vacancy.
2. The exterior facade of vacant storefronts shall be maintained by the property owner at the same level of quality as surrounding occupied storefronts and buildings.
3. Property owners of vacant storefronts shall use creative temporary alternative uses of storefront window areas such as using them as a display area for community information, public art by local artists, and merchandise from other stores.
4. Property owners of vacant storefronts shall consult with the city's economic development staff regarding possible available tenants.
5. Vacant storefronts shall not be boarded up or otherwise appear derelict or abandoned.
6. An adequate level of exterior security lighting shall be regularly maintained regardless of storefront occupancy status.
(Ord. 757, § 2(Exh. A), 2009)
17.15.080 Low Barrier Navigation Center.
A. Purpose and Intent. The purpose of this section is to allow operation of low barrier navigation centers to help people in need of housing t hat are temporarily homeless and to implement the provisions of Government Code Section 65660 relating to low barrier navlgation centers.
B. Definitions. For purposes of this section. t he following definitions shall apply, as defined by Government Code Section 65660.
(Supp. No. 21)
1. Coordinated entry system. A centralized or coordinated assessment system developed pursuant to the applicable provisions of the Code of Federal Regulations as specified in Created : 2.025 ·0 1•N 17: 30: 03 [ EST I
167
Government Code Section 65662, and any related requirements, designed to coordinate program participant intake. assessment. and referrals.
2. Low Barrier. Best practices to reduce barriers to entry, and may include, but is not limited to, the following:
a. The presence of partners if it is not a population-specific site. such as for survivors of domestic violence or sexual assault. women. or youth. b. Pets.
c. The storage of possessions.
d. Privacy. such as partitions around beds in a dormitory setting or in larger rooms containing more than two beds, or private rooms.
c. Requirements. A Low Barrier Navigation Center shall meet the following requirements:
1. It offers services to connect people to permanent housing through a services plan that identifies services staffing.
2. It is linked to a coordinated entry system, so that staff in the interim facility or staff who colocate in the facility may conduct assessments and provide services to connect people to permanent housing.
3. It complies with Chapter 6.5 (commencing with Section 8255) of Division 8 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.
4. It has a system for entering information regarding client stays, client demographics. client income. and exit destination through the local Homeless Management Information System as defined by Section 578.3 of Title 24 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
D. Application Procedure and Review.
(Supp. No. 21)
1. Within 30 days of receipt of an application for a Low Barrier Navigation Center development, the local jurisdiction shall notify a developer whether the developer's application is complete pursuant to Section 65943.
h2. The city shall act within 60 days of receipt of a completed application.
Creat ed : 2025-01-08 17 :30 :03 [ EST]
Page40of 40
168
AGENDA ITEM
I February 3, 2026, City Council Meetin~
~
To:
Through:
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Anderson City Council Joey Forseth-Deshais, City Manager
From: Adam Whelen, Public Works Director
Date: February 3, 2026
!SUBJECT
Public Hearing: Adoption of updated California Building Standards Code
I RECOMMENDATION
The Public Works Director recommends that the City Council:
1. Conduct a Public Hearing; and
2. By motion, Introduce an Ordinance (First Reading) revising Anderson Municipal Code Chapter 15 and adopting by reference the 2025 Edition of the California Building Standards Code, and set for enactment (Second Reading) on February 17, 2026; and
3. Direct the City Clerk to read the Ordinance by Title Only.
I FISCAL IMPACT
The adoption of the 2025 California Building Codes will have no fiscal impact.
ITEM 7.0f PAGE1 2/3/2026
169
I DISCUSSION and BACKGROUND
In January 2026, the State Building Standards Commission adopted the 2025 California Building Standards Code (CBSC) with State amendments. It was published in July 2025 and became effective throughout the State in January 2026.
Building Codes are typically updated every three years and adopted by the State with amendments. The State mandates through the Health and Safety Code that the CBSC be enforced by local jurisdictions. Local jurisdictions may not adopt lesser construction standards than those mandated by the State; however, they may adopt more stringent standards when based on findings of fact for climatic, geographical, or topographical reasons.
The three-year cycle is now complete, and the California Building Standards Commission has revised and published the 2025 California Building Standards Code. Jurisdictions throughout the state are required to adopt the 2025 CBSC.
Although the 2025 CBSC will entail many changes in the way buildings and structures are constructed, staff does not recommend additional modifications to the code.
I ATTACHMENT
1. Proposed Ordinance
ITEM 7.0f PAGE2 2/3/2026
170
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OFTHEaTYCOUNCIL OFTHE TYOF ANDERSON
REPEALING AND REENACTING CERTAIN CHAPTERS AND SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 15 OF THE ANDERSON MUNl PAL CODE, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE 2025 EDITION OFTHE CALIFORNIA BUILDING Sf ANDARDS CODE, KNOWN AS THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE24
The City Council of the City of Anderson does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1-REPEAL
Sections 15.02.020, 15.02.025, and 15.20.010 of the Anderson Municipal Code are hereby repealed in their entirety.
SECTION 2 - PURPOSE AND AUTHORITY
The purpose of this ordinance is to adopt by reference the 2025 edition of the California Building Standards Code, Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, subject to the definitions, clarifications, and amendments set forth in this ordinance. The purpose of this ordinance is also to provide minimum requirements and standards for the protection of the public safety, health, property, and welfare of the City of Anderson. This ordina nee is adopted under the authority of California Government Code Section 5002 2.2 and California Health and Safety Code Section 18941.5.
SECTION 3-BUILDING CODE
Section 15.02.020 of the Anderson Municipal Code is enacted to read:
"15.02.020 Adoption of Uniform Codes.
The 2025 California Building Standards Code, Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, including all parts, appendices, and standards as adopted and amended by the California Building Standards Commission, is hereby adopted by reference and incorporated into this Code, except as expressly amended or superseded by the provisions of this Chapter.
A copy of the California Building Standards Code is on file in the office of the Building Official for examination and use by the public.
171
Ordinance No.
SECTION 4 -OW7IBR1,BUILDINGCODE
Section 15.02.025 of the Anderson Municipal Code is hereby reenacted to read:
"As provided for in Section 15.02.020, the city adopts Chapter 1 of the 2025 Edition of the California Building Code, based upon the 2025 International Building Code, in its entirety." SECTION 5-FIRE CODE
Section 15.20.010 of the Anderson Municipal Code is enacted to read:
"The 2025 Edition of the California Fire Code, based upon the 2025 International Fire Code, as published by the International Code Council, as amended and adopted by the California Building Standards Commission in the California Building Standards Code, Part 9, Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, and the accompanying non-building and administrative regulations, are hereby adopted by reference." A copy of said code is on file in the office of the Building Official for examination and use by the public.
SECTION 6-SEVERABILITY
The provisions of this ordinance are severable, and the invalidity, unenforceability or unconstitutionality of any section, portion or part of this ordinance shall not affect the validity of the remainder of the ordinance.
SECTION 7 -CEQA
The City Council hereby finds and determines that it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that this ordinance may have a significant adverse effect on the environment, since it adopts updated building and safety standards, which the City had previously adopted in substantial form. Thus, the adoption of this ordinance is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines.
SECTION 8-EFFECTIVE DATE AND SUMMARY PUBLICATION
This Ordinance shall be published in the Record Searchlight, a newspaper of general
172
Ordinance No.
circulation in the City of Anderson, in the manner provided by Section 36933 of the Government Code of the State of California, and shall be effective thirty (30) days after its passage.
The foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Anderson on February 3r d , 2026, and enacted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Anderson held on February 17, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Dan Gallier, Mayor of the City of Anderson
ATTEST:
Christy White, City Clerk
173
AGENDA ITEM
I February 3. 2026. City Council Meeting
~
To:
From:
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Anderson City Council Joey Forseth-Deshais, City Manager
Date: February 3, 2026
lsueJECT
Cost of Service Fee Study Report
I RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Receive a Staff Report;
2. Receive Public Comment;
3. Receive a Presentation from Eric Johson with Revenue & Cost Specialists, LLC; !FISCAL IMPACT
There is currently no fiscal impact. The future fiscal impact will be dependent upon Council direction at future Council meetings and workshops.
I DISCUSSION and BACKGROUND
The City has experienced increased costs associated with processing permits, applications, and service requests since the last comprehensive fee updates were adopted. Several departments, including Building, Engineering, Planning, and Recreation have not had fees updated for many years, despite changes in regulations, staffing models, and service delivery. In several cases, consultant costs and staff time are not fully captured in the current fee schedule, and some services performed by staff do not allow for cost recovery.
To address these issue at the April 15, 2025 meeting, Council authorized staff to contract with Revenue & Cost Specialists LLC. (RCS) for a cost allocation plan and citywide fee study.
RCS have worked with City staff over the past six months to conduct a comprehensive ITEM 8.3 PAGE1 2/3/2026
174
review of all services, permits, and applications, including the calculation of fully burdened hourly rates to ensure proposed fees accurately reflect the true cost of service.
This presentation represents the first review of the draft fee study and provides an overview of the methodology used to develop the proposed fees. City Council will have the opportunity to ask questions and provide initial feedback. A workshop with City Council, staff, and the consultant is scheduled for March 3, 2026, to further discuss the proposed fees and any desired modifications. The final fee study is planned to be presented to City Council for adoption on April 7, 2026, with the updated fees to become effective July 1, 2026.
I ATTACHMENT
1. Draft Cost of Services Study
ITEM 8.3 PAGE2 2/3/2026
175
Cost of Services Study
for the
City of Anderson
January 2026
Prepared by:
Revenue & Cost Specialists, LLC
1519 E Chapman Ave, Ste C
Fullerton, CA 92831
www.revenuecost.com
(714) 992-9020
176
City of AmJencm Cose o{Sel'vices Scudy
177
January 29, 2026
Honorable Mayor and City Council
via City Manager Joey Forseth
City of Anderson
1887 Howard Street
Anderson, CA 96007
Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Mr. Forseth:
This Report is submitted pursuant to our contract with the City to perform a revenue and cost analysis for the City for its services.
The motivation for this study is the need of both the City Council and City staff to maintain City's services at a level commensurate with the standards previously set by the City Council, and to maintain effective policy and management control of City services.
This Report provides currently useful information about the City's status on recovery of costs for all City services. In addition, it will assist in projecting and determining the future level and equity of these City services.
RCS wishes to thank all City department heads and staff for their assistance and cooperation extended to us during the accomplishment of our work, without whose aid this Report could not have been produced. The response, awareness and information gathered and supplied by numerous City employees make this Report the sound one we believe it to be.
We also believe that your constituents will appreciate your subjecting the City's operations to business costing methodologies, and your willingness to be informed of the true and full costs of those services which you have decided the City should provide its citizens.
Respectfully submitted,
ERIC JOHNSON
President
AKASIN QUACH PHYAKUL
Analyst
Revenue & Cost Specialists
1519 E. Chapman• Suite C • Fullerton, CA • 92831
178
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY _______________________ S
CHAPTER I - BACKGROUND OF STUDY __________________ 9
CHAPTER II - IDENTIFYING AND COSTING SERVICES _____________ 13 CHAPTER Ill - REVENUES MATCHED AGAINST COSTS _____________ 19 CHAPTER IV - SERVICE REVENUE RECOMMENDATIONS ____________ 25 CONCLUSION _________________________ 35
APPENDIX A - SUMMARY OF CURRENT FEES AND PROPOSED FEES
APPENDIX B - REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEETS MATCHED WITH COST DETAIL
WORKSHEETS
APPENDIX C - DETAIL OF BUILDING & SAFETY FEES
APPENDIX D - DETAIL OF ANIMAL CONTROL FEES
APPENDIX E - DETAIL OF PARKING ENFORCEMENT FINES
APPENDIX F - DETAIL OF RECREATION FACILITY & FIELD RENTAL FEES City of Anderson Cost of Services Stt1dy
179
Pg.OS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Revenue & Cost Specialists (RCS) has subjected the City's operations to a detailed analysis seeking alternate and more equitable ways to finance its services. This report presents the analytical advantages which are available to the City through the institution of a comprehensive system designed by RCS to implement Article XIIIC of the California Constitution.
Based on data presented in this report, the City Council can better respond to the limits on tax revenues available to the City as well as the constant demand for higher and more operational services and capital improvements. Due to demands made of the City, it is essential that the Council and City management have additional information upon which to assist in charting a future financial course that will preserve the quality oflife which its citizens have come to expect.
Systematic and Documented Approach. This analysis was designed to provide the City with a systematic and documented approach to understand, control, and recapture the costs which are forced on it by normal service demands, growth and general economic inflation.
Constitutional Methodology. The methodology used for this analysis is the "costs reasonably borne" test established by Section 8( c) of Proposition 4, now Article XIIIB of the California Constitution, and also Proposition 26, now Article XIIIC of the California Constitution. In following that process, RCS has analyzed the ways in which City services can be financed more equitably to assure the City's future financial viability.
This report evaluates all recommended fees in accordance with Proposition 26 (California Constitution Article XIIIC Section 1). Since each fee identified in this report meets one or more of the Proposition 26 exceptions to the definition of"tax," the City Council is authorized to approve the fees as recommended without seeking voter approval of a tax. The relevant Proposition 26 exceptions include recommended City fees that incorporate:
• The City's reasonable costs of providing a specific benefit to the payor • The City's reasonable costs of providing a service or product to the payor • The City's reasonable costs of regulation, such as licensing, permitting, investigating. inspecting, auditing, or enforcement.
• The value of City land authorized by the City for use by the payor • A fine or penalty for a violation of law.
Full Business Costs Determined. The methodology followed by both the Authors of Proposition 4, and consequently by RCS, determines the full business cost of providing the reported City services.
It also identifies the beneficiaries of those services and determines if they are paying in relationship to benefits derived or if they are deserving of a subsidy paid from the taxes paid by all 5 City of Anderson Cost of Services Study
180
Pg. 06
If all the
recommendations
and suggestions
made in this Report
are adopted, the City
of Anderson would
increase cost
recovery by
$777,750 on an
annual basis
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
local citizens and businesses. Thus, the City Council will have full knowledge of costs which are actually occurring.
Financial lntegtity Established. This report summarizes the work accomplished and presents recommendations. These recommendations, if implemented, would establish the financial integrity of the analyzed City services and would establish a continuing cost control system following the business principles which are generally espoused for government, but often are ignored in application.
ldentifyi ng Service Center
There are three basic steps in the process used by RCS. The first step is to identify the services offered by the City. Next, the service costs are calculated. Finally, the revenue currently received is matched to the cost of providing the service to determine if there is a subsidy from General Fund taxes.
Refinement Process. In a series of meetings held with City staff, department by department, we developed a list of services, and then allocated staff time to the appropriate services. This service time was refined over the course of these meetings until all available staff time was allocated and represented an accurate allocation.
Personal Choice versus Community Supported Services
Personal Choice Services are those offered to identifiable customers at a measured level. They are also services that can be withheld for non-payment. These services are not precisely likened to feebased services to the extent that policy makers may have decided to subsidize them in full or part.
These services are distinguished from Community Supported Services that carry an implicit requirement and rationale for setting a level of subsidization typically based on social, safety or general community welfare.
Summary of Results
If all the recommendations and suggestions made in this Report are adopted, the City of Anderson would increase cost recovery by $777,750 on an annual basis. By taking such actions, far more equity between taxpayers and fee-payers would be gained, and the City's financial picture would be improved.
TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL POSSIBLE
FEE SERVICE PROFIT/ NEW
SERV VENUE C SUBS!O GEST REVENUE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES $270,004 $988,794 ($718,790) VAR. $449,950 PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES $210,473 $363,458 ($152,985) VAR. $128,100 RECREATION SERVICES $120,970 $369,288 ($248,318) VAR. so MAINTENANCE SERVICES $28,790 $216,427 ($187,637) VAR. $176,300 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES $675 $23,962 [$23,287) VAR. $23,400 $630,912 $1,961,929 [$1,331,017} $777,750
6 City of Anderson Cost of Services Study
181
Pg.07 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Polley Review I nformatlon
As the Council conducts its policy review of each of the revenue-cost match-ups, it should refer to Appendix A and also to the text in Chapter IV to assist in that review.
The policy review should assess the General Fund tax revenues used to subsidize each service and address the following options available to the City for each service center:
1. Reduce costs and thereby the General Fund tax subsidy by reducing the level of service or restructuring the service to provide it differently.
2. Adjust or institute a fee or charge to recover all of the "costs reasonably borne".
3. Eliminate a General Fund tax subsidy to another "less deserving" service to utilize the taxes in order to provide this service.
Result of Acceptance of Fee Suggestions
If the suggestions in Chapter IV and in the fee recommendations in Appendix A are adopted in full then a significant amount of added revenues will be available to the City, which would provide taxpayer equity. Most of these new revenues will be from fee increases to replace General Fund tax monies used to make up the difference between fees collected and costs incurred in providing the services, which will then be available for those services which can only be funded from General Fund taxes.
These General Fund tax "diversions" are the now-documented General Fund tax subsidies to potentially self-supporting City services. Thus, additional monies could be made available for police services, infrastructure maintenance, and other City services which are not genernlly conducive to service charges, thereby achieving much closer equity between benefits and associated payments.
Policy Guidance. More importantly, the Council would be able to make its decisions based on business principles as much as is possible.
Understanding of Eguitable Charging for Government. The City Council now has to assist its constituents to understand that under the California Constitution the intent is that:
• General Fund taxes finance services for which there is no alternative way to finance them. • Service charges should be utilized to finance those things for which benefits can be determined.
• Beneficiaries of such services should be charged in direct relationship to the benefits derived.
7 City of Anderson Cost of Services Study
182
Pg. 08 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK
8 City of Anderson Cost of Services Study
183
Pg.09 CHAPTER I - BACKGROUND OF STUDY
CHAPTER I - BACKGROUND OF STUDY
Revenue & Cost Specialist has subjected the City's operations to a detailed analysis seeking alternate and more equitable ways to finance its services. This report presents the analytical advantages which are available to the City through the institution ofa comprehensive system designed by RCS to implement Article XIIIC of the California Constitution.
Based on data presented in this report, the City Council can better respond to the limits on tax revenues available to the City as well as the constant demand for higher and more operational services and capital improvements. Due to demands made of the City, it is essential thatthe Council and City management have additional information upon which to assist in chatting future financial course that will preserve the quality of life which its citizens have come to expect.
Systematic and Documented Approach. This analysis was designed to provide the City with a systematic and documented approach to understand, control, and recapture the costs which are forced on it by normal service demands, growth and general economic intlation.
Constitutional Methodology. The methodology used for this analysis is the "costs reasonably borne" test established by Section 8(c) of Proposition 4, now Article XIIIB of the California Constitution, and also Proposition 26, now Article XIIIC of the California Constitution. In following that process, RCS has analyzed the ways in which City services can be financed more equitably to assure the City's future financial viability.
Full Business Costs Determined. The methodology followed by both the Authors of Proposition 4, and consequently by RCS, determines the full business cost of providing the reported City services.
It also identifies the beneficiaries of those services and determines if they are paying in relationship to benefits derived or if they are deserving of a subsidy paid from the General Fund taxes paid by all local citizens and businesses. Thus, the City Council will have full knowledge and cannot ignore costs which are actually occurring.
Financial Integrity Established. This text summarizes the work accomplished and presents recommendations. These recommendations, if implemented, would firmly establish the financial integrity of the analyzed City services and would establish a continuing cost control system following the business principles which are generally espoused for government, but often are ignored in application.
Financing Adjustments Pursuant to Propositions 4 and 26 Afterthe passage of Proposition 13, the California Taxpayers Association, the California Chamber of Commerce, the National Tax Limitation Committee and the California Association of Realtors put 9 City of Anderson Cost of Services Study
184
Pg.10 CHAPTER I-BACKGROUND OF STUDY
Proposition 4 before the voters. It was adopted by 74.3% of the voters of California on November 6, 1979, and became effective on July 1, 1980, retroactive to Fiscal Year 1978-79.
This proposition, which became Article XIIIB of the State Constitution, addressed all city revenues and established a limit on the growth of tax revenues. Also, because of Proposition 4, fee services cannot exceed the "costs reasonably borne" by the City in providing the service. If the fee exceeds the cost, the excess fee is defined as a special tax, which Proposition 13 requires to be approved by two-thirds of the voters.
This report also evaluates all recommended fees in accordance with Proposition 26 (California Constitution Article XIIIC Section 1). Since each fee identified in this report meets one or more of the Proposition 26 exceptions to the definition of "tax," the City Council is authorized to approve the fees as recommended without seeking voter approval of a tax. The relevant Proposition 26 exceptions include recommended City fees that incorporate:
• The City's costs of providing a specific benefit to the payor. • The City's costs of providing a service or product to the payor. • The City's costs of regulation, such as licensing, permitting, investigating, inspecting, auditing. or enforcement.
• The value of City land authorized by the City for use by the payor • A fine or penalty for a violation of law.
This report provides data to the City for reviewing the reported fee-financed services based on full-costing information and for implementing the "costs reasonably borne" provision of these Constitutional Articles, within presently known legal parameters and the authors' pronounced and published intent
Adjustments to Financing. As a result of this analysis, the City now possesses the basis for making necessary adjustments to its methods offinancing services for those services reported on herein. It can achieve a more equitable and fair mix for financing those services and capital needs, using taxes and service charges, in the direction pointed by passage of Articles XIIIB and X[(IC.
It should be remembered from the start that general fund taxes are now limited and controlled, and therefore the capability of using these taxes to subsidize "special" services which are wholly or partially fee-financed is also limited.
Desirability of Direct Relationship between Payment and Service This direct fee-for-service and tax equity relationship does not exist when general fund tax monies are used to subsidize services which are received by only a small portion of the taxpaying public or by non-residents. A major underlying goal of this project is to provide information and guidance to the Council on how the City can continue as a viable financial entity, finance the services and 10 City of Anderson Cost of Services Study
185
Pg.11 CHAPTERI-BACKGROUNDOFSTUDY
facilities that its citizens and business enterprises have come to expect, and yet in the long run be able to live within the limits imposed by Articles XIIIB and XIIIC.
At the same time, the City can re-establish basic fairness and equity between users of City services and those who pay for them and control those costs on a continuing basis.
Costs Exceeding Revenues. The full costs of delivering the City's defined fee-financed services are running at an annual rate beyond current or expected fee revenues. The result is the diversion of General Fund tax monies to make up the difference between fee revenues collected and full business costs incurred.
Revenue Exceeding Costs. For a limited number of services, the current fee revenue exceeds the cost of providing the service, which is referred to as a profit To remedy this situation, the City must lower these fees to a level that is no more than the current cost of providing the service.
Variety of Equitable Revenue Sources. This analysis presents a wide variety of ways in which revenue can surely and legally be raised, and as important, more equitably raised than at present.
The amount of new revenues to be raised is dependent upon the Council's determination of the level of support for essential services.
Text Topics
The remaining Chapters of this text address the following topics:
II. Identifying and Costing Service Centers
Ill. Overview of Service Revenues Matched Against Costs IV. Service Revenue Recommendations
V. Conclusion
City of Anderson Cost of Services Stttdy
186
Pg.12 CHAPTER I - BACKGROUND OF STUDY
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK
12 City of Anderson Cost of Services Study
187
Pg.13 CHAPTER II - IDENTIFYING AND COSTING SERVICES
CHAPTER II - IDENTIFYING AND COSTING
SERVICES
There are three basic steps in the process used by RCS to identify and cost out service centers. The first step is to identify the services offered by the City. Next, the service costs are calculated.
Finally, the revenue currently received is matched to the cost of providing the service to determine if there is a subsidy from taxes. This chapter covers the first two steps and Chapter Ill shows the match-up of revenues and costs.
Identifying Service Centers
Two techniques were utilized to identify the service centers for which revenue and cost data were gathered and around which the service cost analysis of this Report is built.
Revenue Analysjs. The first technique involved gathering revenue information for the past fiscal year, and then updating and revising the budget estimates for the same revenue sources for the fiscal year during which the analysis was performed by RCS. The Budget and financial reports for the current fiscal year were secured and analyzed. Budgeted and received revenues for all feesupported services were extracted from those rep011s, where such information was available. RCS has divided services into far smaller "service centers" than the City has traditionally designated.
Service Center Identification. The second technique involved several scheduled meetings with City staff to identify each type of service being provided with or without charge. In a series of meetings held with City staff, department by depa1tment, RCS developed a comprehensive list of services and then allocated staff time to the appropriate services. This service time was refined over the course of these meetings until all available staff time was allocated and represented an accurate allocation.
Resultant Service Centers
"Service Center" Defined. The "service revenue," fee or charge for a service, and the related "service cost" comprise a "service center". Each service center has a unique "Revenue and Cost Summary Worksheet" and a matching "Cost Detail Worksheet", which are found in Appendix B of this Report. These "Service Center Worksheets" are matched to one another on facing pages.
Detailed Back-Up Workpapers. The costs are backed up by detailed analyses, which have been turned over to the City in several volumes of work papers and detailed cost distribution reports. 13 City of Anderson Cost of Servfces Study
188
Pg. 14
I
To validate the
reasonableness of
the Study, 100% of
the available work
hours for all City
employees were
distributed and
accounted for,
even if it's not
public serving.
CHAPTER II - IDENTIFYING AND COSTING SERVICES
Types of Costs
The following costs make up the cost detail found on the right-hand page in Appendix B for each service center. The cost data used below was extracted from City documents, such as the adopted budget, actual employee salary and benefit detail, and labor group Memorandums of Understanding, which were received from City staff.
Salaries and Wages. City government is in fact a service industry, and therefore, it is natural that salaries make up the largest single element of cost for most services. In order to allocate the salaries, lengthy interviews were held, documents sought and researched, and reports and accounting records examined by RCS. The result was, in most cases, a percentage or hours distribution of individual employee personal services costs.
To validate the reasonableness of the Study, 100% of the available work hours for all City employees were distributed and accounted for. This includes services provided to the public, whether supported by fees or by taxes, and support services provided to other parts of the organization. No judgments were made about what personnel should or might be doing. Their time was distributed to those service centers where the time was expended to provide a full picture of all work being performed.
Employee Fringe Benefits. Since fractional time, to as low as three minutes per unit of service or one-twentieth of a percent of the annual time of an employee has been allocated to service centers. fringe benefit costs also must be fractionalized to carefully and accurately distribute those ancillary personnel costs.
The City finances numerous benefits for its employees, thereby incurring measurable costs for these items, including:
• Retirement and pension liabilities
• Group Health Insurance
• Medicare Insurance
• Life and Long· Term Disability Insurance
• Workers Compensation Insurance
• Employee Assistance Program
All of these costs are current operating expenses, and the amounts were isolated. Actual costs were determined and reduced to a percentage of salary for each of the positions.
Available Work-Hours. After the individual elements of cost for positions were compiled, the total cost for each position was divided by the number of available work-hours. Available work hours 14 City of Anderson Cost of Services Study
189
Pg. 15 CHAPTER II - IDENTIFYING AND COSTING SERVICES
were calculated as the total possible work-hours in a year, 2,080, less the following away-fromwork benefit hours:
• Holidays
• Vacations
• Personal Leave
• Sick Leave
• Morning/ Afternoon Breaks
• Start Up/Down Time
Maintenance and Operation Costs. All maintenance and operation costs, including non-personnel expenses such as professional services, insurance, operating supplies etc., were derived from the current year Council-approved budget and allocated via percentages or through actual allocation to each of the service centers identified in a department or division.
General and Departmental Overhead Costs. Overhead costs provide the vital glue that holds an organization together operationally and provide important coordinating capabilities. They also provide the day-to-day support services and facilities required for the organization to function effectively. RCS calculated the City's Cost Allocation Plan (CAP) to identify and allocate these costs to the remainder of the City organization. In the CAP, costs were allocated to end-user departments and divisions by applying an appropriate overhead allocation factor. Each factor was related to the work effort of its particular overhead element and was assessed for relevance and reasonableness.
Full Cost Distribution. The purpose of deriving overhead costs is to apportion these amounts to direct service program costs. By adopting this method, the City will be aware of its true costs and be able to emulate business methods.
15 City of Anderson Cost of Services Study
190
Pg. 16 CHAPTER II - IDENTIFYING AND COSTING SERVICES
General City Overhead
w
-
General City Overhead. These services primarily set policy and support other departments without providing a direct service to the public. Where they do perform an end-user service, such costs have not been allocated to other departments.
Departmental Administration. Costs in this category involve intra-departmental support functions, outside the above listed general City overhead functions, and involve the allocation of staff time within and among departmental functions. These services also do not provide end-user deliverables to the public but instead provide vital administrative support within specific departments.
Fully Allocated Hourly Rates (FAHR)
All of the above items make up the fully allocated hourly rate which is calculated for each position in the City. The makeup of each component of the City-wide average fully allocated hourly rate is detailed in the chart below.
16 City of Anderson Cost of Services Study
191
Pg. 17 CHAPTER II - IDENTIFYING AND COSTING SERVICES
Fully Allocated Hourly Rate Components
17 Operating Expenses
4.9%
City of Anderson Cost of Services Study
192
Pg.18 CHAPTER II - IDENTIFYING AND COSTING SERVICES
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK
18 City of Anderson Cost of Services Study
193
Pg.19 CHAPTER III - REVENUES MATCHED AGAINST COSTS
CHAPTER Ill - REVENUES MATCHED AGAINST
COSTS
In the last chapter the method of calculating the costs for all City services was identified. This chapter begins with a Summary that itemizes the revenues and costs by service center. Then, an overview is presented of what will be presented in the following chapter, which shows that there is no one solution to the City's financial challenge.
Accounting for All Revenues - Fees and Taxes
Local government funding comes from a multitude of revenue sources such as taxes, fines, grants, use of property, user fees, utility rates, etc. Our Study focuses on the relationship between fees and General Fund taxes. As an example, [S-001] Use Permit (Minor) in the following schedule estimates the full costs at $14,354. These expenses are offset by current fee revenues of $3,000, and $11,354 of the City's limited General Fund tax revenues must be used to pay for the remaining. This subsidy can be eliminated by raising the relevant fees. To the extent that the fees are NOT increased, general City taxes paid by all taxpayers are the only alternative revenue source.
SCHEDULE!
SUMMARY OF FEE SERVICES AND CURRENT FINANCING
FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026
TOTAL RESOURCES USED
SERVICE TO FINANCE SERVICE
REF#(l) SERVICE (2) COST £3) FEES £4) TAXES (Sl
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
S-001 USE PERMIT (MINOR) $14,354 $3,000 $11,354
S-002 USE PERMIT fMAIORl $22,262 $6,000 $16,262
S-003 USE PERMIT EXTENSION $3,011 $0 $3,011
S-004 VARIANCE $4,257 $800 $3,457
S-005 DESIGN REVIEW $11,429 $750 $10,679
S-006 PRE-DEVELOPMENT MEETING $11,834 $0 $11,834
S-007 GENERAL/ SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT $0 $0 $0
S-008 ZONE CHANGE $0 $0 $0
S-009 ANNEXATION $0 $0 $0
S-010 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION $806 $0 $806
S-011 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $0 $0 $0
S-012 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP $17,269 $3,000 $14,269
S-013 TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP $16,359 $2,600 $13,759
S-014 PROPERTY LINE ADIUSMENT $6,016 $1,000 $5,016
S-015 TENTATIVE MAP EXTENSION $3,169 $300 $2,869
S-016 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE $3,169 $0 $3,169
S-017 CONDITIONAL CERT OF COMPLIANCE $0 $0 $0
S-018 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT $0 $0 $0
S-019 PLANNING RELATED AMENDMENTS $11,131 $500 $10,631
S-020 APPEAL $6,616 $400 $6,216
19 City of Anderson Cost of Services Study
194
Pg. 20 CHAPTER III - REVENUES MATCHED AGAINST COSTS
TOTAL RESOURCES USED
SERVICE TO FINANCE SERVICE
REF# (ll SERVICE (21 COST (3) FEES (41 TAXES (5)
S-021 SHOPPING CART RETRIEVAL AND STORAGE $0 $0 $0
S-022 NEW SIGN PERMIT $27,827 $2,325 $2S,502
S-023 FACE CHANGE SIGN PERMIT $3,669 $0 $3,669
S-024 FLOODPLAIN DETERM/ZONING CONFIRM $2,401 $240 $2,161 S-025 ADDRESS/RE-ADDRESS $2,099 $0 $2,099
S-026 HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT $12,292 $2,000 $10,292
S-027 ADDITIONAL REVIEW AND INSPECTION $0 $0 $0
S-028 MISC PLANNING SERVICES $0 $0 $0
S-029 GENERAL Pl.AN MAINTENANCE $50,000 $0 $50,000
S-030 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TECHNOWGY $30,000 $0 $30,000 S-031 BUILDING Pl.AN CHECK/INSPECTION $514,116 $211,712 $302,404 S-032 ENCROACHMENT PERMITS $50,122 $8,644 $41,478
S-033 ENGINEERING Pl.AN CHECK/IMPROVEMENT $161,974 $25,933 $136,041 S-034 ENGINEERING MAP CHECK $0 $0 $0
S-035 TRANSPORTATION PERMIT $2,612 $800 $1,812
SUBTOTAL· DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ._I -~S9;;.;:8;..;:;8!..:.,7..:.. 94..:.....J..l ......:::$-=270.:...;::.,.,::..: 00::...:4'--'-I ____;S::...:7-=1-=8 •<.:. ' ..:.. 90"--'I
PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES
S-036 FALSE ALARM $67 893 $35,000 $32,893
S-037 VEHICLE IMPOUND RELEASE $279,950 $156,250 $123,700 S-038 VEHICLE REPOSESSJON PROCCESSING $371 $600 ($229)
S-039 TICKET SIGN OFFS $11,360 $5,000 $6,360
S-040 VIN VERIFICATION $49 $0 $49
S-041 Al.ARM PERMIT APP/ RENEWAL PROCESSING $45 $45 $0
S-042 REINSTATEMENT OF Al.ARM PERMIT $909 $500 $409
S-043 RECORD CLEARANCE LETTER $227 $150 $77
S-044 POLICE BUS. BACKGROUND CHECK $182 $60 $122
S-045 SECONDHAND DEALER LICENSE $105 $150 ($45)
S-046 GUN STORAGE $916 $400 $516
S-047 FINGERPRINT REOUEST $30 $18 $12
S-048 POLICE REPORT COPIES $683 $11,250 ($10,5671
S-049 LOG REPORTS $683 $750 ($671
S-050 COPY PHOTOS TO MEDIA DEVICE $55 $300 ($245)
S-051 ANIMAL CONTROL $0 $0 $0
S-052 PARKING CITATIONS $0 $0 $0
suBTOTAL - PUBLIC SAFETY sERv1cES I .... _.....;..; S3""'6"""J.<...: ,4...c... ss-'--'-l ........;:; s=2=10c...4.c..;1'-"'3_._l _ s'-'1=s=2·=9.;;.. as__.l
RECREATION SERVICES
S-053 ADULT SPORTS· VOLLEYBALL $9,045 $3,150 $5,895
S-054 YOUTH SPORTS - BASKETBALL $22,504 $8,010 $14,494
S-055 SNAP BASKETBALL $1,864 $0 $1,864
S-056 AQUATICS PROGRAM $92,078 $11,633 $80,445
S-057 SUMMER CAMP $50,614 $5,200 $45,414
20 City of Anderson Cost of Services Study
195
Pg. 21
[T]he City provides
$1.9 million in fee
services annually
and only recovers
$630K from fee
revenues. Each year,
an additional $1.3
million, coming from
other funding
sources, is needed to
pay for these fee
services.
CHAPTER III - REVENUES MATCHED AGAINST COSTS
TOTAL RESOURCES USED
SERVICE TO FINANCE SERVICE
REF# (1) SERVICES (21 COST (31 FEES {4) TAXES (51
S-058 CONTRACT CLASSES $2,642 $2,700 $(581
S-059 FACILITY / FIELD/ PARK RENTALS $123,850 $73,057 $50,793 S-060 SPLASH PAD $32,156 $8,500 $23,656
S-061 ICE RINK $29,598 $3,270 $26,328
S-062 MOSQUITO SERENADE VENDOR $4,937 $5,450 ($5131
SUBTOTAL. RECREATION SERVICES I
MAINTENANCE SERVICES
$369,zas I s120,910 I s24s,J1e 1
S-063 COMMUNITY BENCH PROGRAM $2,400 $0 $2,400
S-064 WATER METER INSTALLATION $18,212 $2,200 $16,012
S-065 TEMPORARY WATER METER RENTAL $228 $40 $188
S-066 TEMPORARY WATER METER MOVE $70 $0 $70
S-067 WATER SYSTEM EXTENSION INSP. $926 $25 $901
S-068 WATER METER TEST $8,492 $500 $7,992
S-069 WATER TURN ON AFTER NONPAYMENT $40,934 $11,250 $29,684 S-070 NON-EMERGENCY AFTER HOURS ON/OFF $5,020 $0 $5,020 S-071 WATER METER TAMPERING $0 $0 $0
S-072 WATER BACKFLOW INSPECTION $132,908 $14,000 $118,908 S-073 GREASE TRAP INSPECTION $5,312 $0 $5,312
S-074 GREASE TRAP INSPECTION FOLLOW-UP $121 $25 $96
S-075 NEW INDUSTRIAL WASTE USER PERMIT $549 $0 $549
S-076 INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT RENEWAL $274 $0 $274
S-077 ILLEGAL DISCHARGE $0 $0 $0
S-078 BANNER POLE INSTALLATION $981 $750 $23 1
SUBTOTAL- MAINTENANCE SERVICES ~I -~$2~1~6-'-"', 4_2_7 .... 1 ___ $_28_.,7_9-'0-'1~_$_18_7 ...... ,63~7 I
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
S-079 BUSINESS LICENSE PROCESSING $9,985 $0 $9,985
S-080 BUSINESS LICENSE RENEWAL $11,816 $0 $11,816
S-081 NSF CHECK PROCESSING $744 $675 $69
S-082 DOCUMENT REPRODUCTION $1 $0 $1
S-083 ELECTRONIC FILE REPRODUCTION $1 $0 $1
S-084 NOTARY PUBLIC $9 $0 $9
S-085 MAJOR SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT $1,350 $0 $1,350
S-086 MINOR SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT $56 $0 $56
SUBTOTAL. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES I .... ----'$'-"'2""- 3""", 9 ___ 6_2 ... I__ ..:,. $6~7_;;;5_.l_---'$'-2 ___ 3,.... 2..... 87~1 GRAND TOTAL I $1,961,929 I $630,912 I $1,331,017 I
City of Anderson Cost of Services Study
21 196
Pg.22 CHAPTER III - REVENUES MATCHED AGAINST COSTS
Schedule 1 above shows that the City provides $1.9 million in fee services annually and only recovers $630K from fee revenues. Each year, an additional $1.3 million, coming from other funding sources, is needed to pay for these fee services.
Polley Review Information
As the Council conducts its policy review of each of the revenue-cost match-ups in the next chapter, it should refer to comments on the bottom of the service center worksheets in Appendix B and also in the text in the next chapter to assist in that review.
The policy review should assess the General Fund tax revenues used to subsidize each service and address the following options available to the City for each service center:
1. Reduce costs and thereby the General Fund tax subsidy by reducing the level of service or restructuring the service to provide it differently.
2. Adjust or institute a fee or charge to recover all of the "costs reasonably borne".
3. Eliminate a tax subsidy to another "less deserving" service to utilize the General Fund taxes in order to provide this service.
Result of Acceptance of Fee Suggestions
1 f the suggestions in the following Chapter and on the Service Center Worksheets are adopted in full then a significant amount of added revenues will be available to the City, which would provide taxpayer equity. Most of these new revenues will be from fee increases to replace tax monies used to make up the difference between fees collected and costs incurred in providing the services, which will then be available for those services which can only be funded from taxes.
These tax "diversions" are the now-documented tax subsidies to potentially self-supporting City services. Thus, additional monies could be made available for police services, infrastructure maintenance, and other City services which are not generally conducive to service charges, thereby achieving much closer equity between benefits and associated payments.
Policy Guidance. More importantly, the Council would be able to make its decisions based on business principles as much as is possible.
Understanding of Equitable Charging for Government The City Council now has to assist its constituents to understand that under the California Constitution the intent is:
• That taxes finance those services for which there is no other alternative way to finance them.
22 City of Anderson Cost of Services Study
197
Pg. 23 CHAPTER III - REVENUES MATCHED AGAINST COSTS
• That service charges should be utilized to finance those things for which benefits can be determined.
• That the beneficiaries of such services should be charged in direct relationship to the benefits derived.
23 City of Anderson Cost of Services Study
198
Pg.24 CHAPTER III - REVENUES MATCHED AGAINST COSTS
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK
City of Anderson Cost of Services Study
199
Pg.25 CHAPTER IV - SERVICE REVENUE RECOMMENDATIONS
CHAPTER IV - SERVICE REVENUE
RECOMMENDATIONS
The purpose of this Chapter is to present the services which RCS initially labeled as Personal Choice and to suggest the magnitude of tax revenues that could be diverted from these services to Community Supported Services.
City Council has Final Iudgment. It must be understood that considerable judgment, albeit experienced, was exercised by RCS in suggesting what services were Personal Choice as opposed to Community Supported Services and in suggesting that most Personal Choice Services should be paid for by the service requestor rather than subsidized by the entire community. However, the final decision on the nature of the service and whether it deserves to be subsidized will have to be made by the City Council.
Service Groups
RCS has organized Personal Choice Services into the following service groups for purposes of discussion:
1. Community Development Services
2. Public Safety Services
3. Recreation Services
4. Maintenance Services
5. Administrative Services
These groups, explained in turn, are program oriented. Each group includes a table summarizing the revenues and costs of each service. The table summarizing the group tables is found at the end of this Chapter.
Appendix A, following the text, summarizes the current fees and the proposed fees for each of the Personal Choice service centers.
Service Center details found in Appendix B, are in sequence by the Reference Number (Column 1 on each of the following Tables), include detail information for each service on two facing pages.
The left page has textual and summary information including RCS's suggested service fee. The right page has the service cost detail.
25 City of Anderson Cost of Services Study
200
Pg. 26 CHAPTER IV - SERVICE REVENUE RECOMMENDATIONS
General Commentary on Chapter Tables
Each table has eight columns, explained here:
• Column 1 is the Report Reference Number.
• Column 2 is the title of the service.
• Columns 3, 4 & 5 are the same amounts for revenue, cost and profit/(subsidy) found on the left page of the detail service sheets in Appendix B. • Column 6 is the current percentage of costs recovered from the user fees and charges with the difference being subsidized by taxes.
• Column 7 is the percentage of user fee cost recovery which might be obtainable without tax subsidy. Of course, decisions regarding tax subsidies to a service are a City Council policy decision on how to allocate its tax and gene ral revenues. • Column 8 contains the estimated amount ofrevenues which RCS suggests could be raised or reduced.
Special Circumstances
The table also includes footnotes which identify special circumstances for some fees. For a service that is marked (a), there is insufficient data to determine the financial impact. When a service is marked (b), the fee is deposit based and financial estimations are not possible. Services marked (c), are restricted by law, and cannot be adjusted for full cost recovery. For services marked (d), are market-based and City staff recommends that the service fee remain subsidized. 26 City of Anderson Cost of Services Study
201
Pg. 27 CHAPTER IV - SERVICE REVENUE RECOMMENDATIONS
Community Development Services
When basic City development services are supported by general taxes, there is little reason for taxes to also finance those Personal Choice services which mainly benefit a developer or specific property owner. Thus, the expenses distributed across these service centers are primarily the incremental additional expenses caused by development. Were no development to take place, most of these costs could be eliminated, or at least significantly reduced.
TABLE 1-COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
REF# SERVICE
rtl r21
S-001 USE PERMIT (MINORl
S-002 USE PERMIT (MAIORl
S-003 USE PERMIT EXTENSION
S-004 VARIANCE
S-005 DESIGN REVIEW
S-006 PRE-DEVELOPMENT MEETING
S-007 GENERAL/SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT
S-008 ZONE CHANGE
S-009 ANNEXATION
S-010 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION
S-011 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
S-012 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
S-013 TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
S-014 PROPERTY LINE AOIUSMENT
S-015 TENTATIVE MAP EXTENSION
S-016 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
S-017 CONDITIONAL CERT OF COMPLIANCE
S-018 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
S-019 PLANNING RELATED AMENDMENTS
S-020 APPEAL
S-021 SHOPPING CART RETRIEVAL AND STORAGE
S-022 NEW SIGN PERMIT
S-023 FACE CHANGE SIGN PERMIT
S-024 FLOODPLAIN DETERM/ZONING CONFIRM
S-025 AODRESS/RE-AODRESS
S-026 HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT
S-027 ADDITIONAL REVIEW AND INSPECTION
S·028 MISC PLANNING SERVICES
S-029 GENERAL PLAN MAINTENANCE
S-030 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TECHNOLOGY
S-031 BUIWING PLAN CHECK/INSPECTION
S-032 ENCROACHMENT PERMITS
S-033 ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK/IMPROVEMENT
5·034 ENGINEERING MAP CHECK
S-035 TRANSPORTATION PERMIT
SUBTOTAL· COM DEV SERVICES
(a) Insufficient data to detennine financial impact
(b) Deposit based service/fee
( c) Fee restricted by Law
TOTAL TOTAL
FEE SERVICE
REVENUE COST
(31 (41
$3 000 $14.354
$6000 $22 262
$0 $3011
$800 $4 257
$750 $11,429
so $11.834
so $0
so $0
so $0
$0 $806
$0 $0
$3000 $17 269
$2.600 S16-159
$1,000 $6,016
$300 $3,169
$0 $3169
$0 $0
$0 $0
$500 $11,131
$400 $6616
$0 $0
$2-125 $27.827
$0 $3,669
$240 $2,401
so $2099
$2 000 $12 292
$0 $0
$0 $0
$0 $50,000
$0 $30000
$211712 $514116
$8,644 $50 122
$25,933 $161,974
$0 $0
$800 $2612
$270,004 $988,794
27 TOTAL PCT. RECOVERY
PROFIT/ FROM FEES
(SUBSIDY) ACTUAL SUGGEST
(51 (61 171
($11.3541 20.9% 100%
($16262' 27.0% 100%
($3 0111 0.0% 100%
($3,457: 18.8% 100%
($10,6791 6.6% 100%
($11.8341 0.0% 100%
$0 0.0% 100%
$0 0.0% 100%
$0 0.0% 100%
($8061 0.0% 100%
$0 0.0% 100%
($142691 17.4% 100%
($13 7591 15.9% 100%
($5,016 16.6% 100%
($2,8691 9.5% 100%
($3 169 0.0% 100%
$0 0.0% 100%
$0 0.0% 100%
1$10,631' 4.5% 100%
($6 2161 6.1% 100%
$0 0.0% 100%
rs25_i;o21 8.4% 100%
($3,6691 0.0% 100%
($2,1611 10.0% 100%
rs2 0991 0.0% 100%
($10.2921 16.3% 100%
$0 0.0% 100%
$0 0.0% 100%
($50,0001 0.0% 100%
($300001 0.0% 100%
($3024041 41.2% 100%
($414781 17.3% 100%
($136,0411 16.0% 100%
$0 0.0% 100%
1$1 8121 30.6% 100%
($718,790) 27.3%
POSSIBLE
NEW
REVENUE
(81
$11400
$16 300
$0
$3,500
$10,700
$11.800
$0
$0
$0
$800
$0
$14 300
$0
$5,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$10,600
$0
$0
$25 500
$3,700
$2,200
$2 100
$10 300
$0
$0
$50,000
$30 000
$151200
$20 750
$68,000
$0
$1 ROO
$449,950
(a)
(b)
{b)
{b)
(bl
(b)
(a)
(a)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(a)
(b)
{b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(b)
(c)
City of Anderson Cost of Services Study
202
Pg. 28 CHAPTER IV - SERVICE REVENUE RECOMMENDATIONS
Development services provided to individuals and businesses account for $988,794 in total service costs for the City. The City is able to recover 27.3% from the current fees, and RCS' suggested fees will recover an additional $449,950 for the City.
Development Services Surcharges. There are two services included here which are surcharges for specific purposes.
The General Plan Maintenance Surcharge (S-029) is collected to set aside funds for the future update of the City's General Plan. The occurrence of development over time causes changes to the General Plan that must be updated.
The Community Development Technology Surcharge (S-030) is collected to set aside funds for future development-related technology, such as permitting systems, data storage systems, and hardware.
For both of these surcharges, the revenue needs to accumulate over time. Therefore, it is imperative that separate funds with on-going fund balances be created to store these funds until they are needed for the specific purpose outlined.
28 City of Anderson Cost of Services Study
203
Pg. 29 CHAPTER IV - SERVICE REVENUE RECOMMENDATIONS
Public Safety Services
These service centers are identified for public safety related services.
TABLE 2 - PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES
REF# SERVICE
m r21
S-036 FAI.SEALARM
S-037 VEHICLE IMPOUND RELEASE
S-038 VEHICLE REPOSESSION PROCCESSING
S-039 TICKET SIGN OFFS
S-040 VIN VERIFICATION
S-041 ALARM PERMIT APP/RENEWAL PROCESSING
5-042 REINSTATEMENT OF Al.ARM PERMIT
S-043 RECORD CLEARANCE LETTER
S-044 POLICE BUS. BACKGROUND CHECK
S-045 SECONDHAND DEALER LICENSE
S-046 GUN STORAGE
S-047 FINGERPRINT REQUEST
S-048 POLICE REPORT COPIES
S-049 LOG REPORTS
S-050 COPY PHOTOS TO MEDIA DEVICE
S-051 ANIMAL CONTROL
S-052 PARKING CITATIONS
SUBTOTAL· PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES
(c) Fee restricted by Law
(d) Fees are market sensitive
TOTAL TOTAL
FEE SERVICE
REVENUE COST
(31 r4l
$35,000 $67,893
$156,250 $279950
$600 $371
$5000 $11360
$0 $49
$45 $45
$500 $909
$150 $227
$60 $182
$150 $105
$400 $916
$18 $30
$11250 $683
$750 $683
$300 $55
$0 $0
$0 $0
$210,473 $363,458
29 TOTAL PCT. RECOVERY
PROFIT/ FROM FEES
(SUBSIDY) ACTUAL SUGGEST
rs1 (61 r11
($32.8931 51.6% 100%
1$123 7001 55.8% 100%
$229 161.7% 100%
($63601 44.0% 75%
($491 0.0% 100%
so 100.0% 100%
1$4091 55.0% 100%
($77) 66.1% 100%
1$1221 33.0% 100%
$45 142.9% 100%
($5161 43.7% 100%
1$121 60.0% 100%
$10.567 1647.1% 100%
$67 109.8% 100%
$245 545.5% 100%
$0 0.0% 100%
$0 0.0% 100%
($152,985) 57.9%
POSSIBLE
NEW
REVENUE
(81
$0
$123 700
($2001
$3 500
$0
$0
$400
$100
$100
$0
$500
$0
$0
$0
$0
so
$0
$128,100
(d)
(c}
(c)
(c)
(c)
City of Anderson Cost of Services Study
204
Pg. 30 CHAPTER IV - SERVICE REVENUE RECOMMENDATIONS
Recreation Services
TABLE 3 - RECREATION SERVICES
TOTAi, TOTAi,
FEE SERVICE
REF# SERVICE REVENUE COST
(1) (21 f3l [41
S·053 ADULT SPORTS· VOLLEYBALi, $3150 $9 045
S-054 YOUTH SPORTS • BASKETBALi, $8010 $22 504
S-055 SNAP BASKETBALi, $0 $1,864
S-056 AQUATICS PROGRAM $11,633 $92,07B
S-057 SUMMER CAMP $5,200 $50,614
S·OSB CONTRACT CLASSES $2 700 $2 642
S-059 FACILITY /FIEI..D/PARK RENTALS $73 057 $123850
S-060 SPLASH PAD $8500 $32156
S-061 JCE RJNK $3.270 $29598
S-062 MOSQUITO SERENADE VENDOR $5450 $4937
TOTAL
PROFIT/
(SUBSIDY}
(5)
[$5.895'
($144941
($1,864'
($80,445)
($45,414)
$58
($50 7931
($23 656)
f$26.32.8J
$513
PCT. RECOVERY
FROM FEES
ACTUAi, SUGGEST
f6l f7J
34.8% 100%
35.6% 100%
0.0% 100%
12.6% 100%
10.3% 100%
102.2% 100%
59.0% 100%
26.4% 100%
11.1% 100%
110.4% 100%
POSSIBLE
NEW
REVENUE
f8J
so
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
(d}
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
{d)
SUBTOTAL· RECREATION SERVICES
(d} Fees are market sensitive
$120,970 S369,288 ($248,318) 32.8% so
This report recommends specific changes to the various Recreation Services program and rental fees in Appendix F of this Report. In addition to these fee changes, it is recommended that Recreation Services cost recovery goals be set as a percentage of revenues over direct costs, excluding indirect costs. This practice is quite common in local government operations, not because indirect costs do not exist and are not important, but rather to ensure that the cost recovery goals remain relevant, market competitive, and are easily reproducible.
The infrequency of annual CPI fee updates or irregular comprehensive fee studies cannot meet the timing and pricing demands of the services offered by Recreation Services (i.e .. seasonal facility rental rates & new programs}. It is recommended that the City Manager be authorized to set Recreation Services fees on a quarterly basis. The City Manager will summarize the fee adjustments, and overall effect of those adjustments, to the City Council within the annual budget process, so that City Council may provide future policy guidance on program cost recovery and service levels.
Social Policy. The City Council should develop a conscious policy as to what programs and service centers, and to what extent, should be subsidized with tax monies in promoting social benefit. It may well be that some level of subsidy for many of the services identified in this group is not only necessary, but also appropriate. If that is deemed to be the case, subsidy levels can be set as part of a budgetary or programmatic policy statement These policy statements can also explicitly describe the social reasoning involved in the decision-making process. 30 City of Anderson Cost of Services Study
205
Pg.31 CHAPTER IV - SERVICE REVENUE RECOMMENDATIONS
Maintenance Services
These se!Vice centers are identified for Utility and Maintenance related sen,,ices.
TABLE 4- MAINTENANCE SERVICES
REF# SERVICE
rt1 (2l
S-063 COMMUNITY BENCH PROGRAM
S-064 WATER METER INSTALLATION
S-065 TEMPORARY WATER METER RENTAL
S-066 TEMPORARY WATER METER MOVE
S·067 WATER SYSTEM EXTENSION INSP.
S-068 WATER METER TEST
S-069 IWATER TURN ON AFTER NONPAYMENT
S-070 NON-EMERGENCY AFTER HOURS ON/OFF
S-071 WATER METER TAMPERING
S-072 !WATER BACKFLOW INSPECTION
S-073 GREASE TRAP INSPECTION
S-074 GREASE TRAP INSPECTION FOLLOW-UP
S-075 NEW INDUSTRIAL WASTE USER PERMIT
S-076 INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT RENEWAL
S-077 ILLEGAL DISCHARGE
S-078 BANNER POLE INSTALLATION
SUBTOTAL - MAINTENANCE SERVICES"
(a) Insufficient data to determine financial impact
(d) Fees are market sensitive
TOTAL TOTAL
FEE SERVICE
REVENUE COST
f3) f4l
$0 $2,400
$2 200 $18,212
$40 $228
$0 $70
$25 $926
$500 $8 492
$11,250 $40,934
$0 $5,020
$0 $0
$14 000 $132,908
$0 $5 312
$25 $121
$0 $549
$0 $274
$0 $0
$750 $981
$28,790 ,,. $216,427
31 TOTAL PCT. RECOVERY POSSIBLE
PROFIT/ FROM FEES NEW
(SUBSIDY) ACTUAL SUGGEST REVENUE
fSl f6l f7) f8l
($2,4001 0.0% 100% $0
($16,0121 12.1% 100% $16,000
(S188l 17.5% 100% S200
($70) 0.0% 100% $100
f$901l 2.7% 100% so
f$7 9921 5.9% 100% so
($29,6841 27.5% 100% $29,700
fSS,020: 0.0% 100% $5,000
so 0.0% 100% so
f$118 908l 10.5% 100% $118 900
1$5 312) 0.0% 100% $5 300
f$96 20.7% 100% $100
($5491 0.0% 100% $500
($2741 0.0% 100% $300
so 0.0% 100% so
($2311 76.5% 100% $200
($187,637) 13.3% $176,300
City of Anderson Cost of Services Study
(dJ
(a)
(d)
206
Pg.32 CHAPTER IV - SERVICE REVENUE RECOMMENDATIONS
Administrative Services
Miscellaneous administrative service centers fall into this group.
TABLE 5 -ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
REF# SERVICE
(1) f2)
5-079 BUSINESS LICENSE PROCESSING
S-080 BUSINESS LICENSE RENEWAL
S-081 NSF CHECK PROCESSING
S-082 DOCUMENT REPRODUCTION
S-083 ELECTRONIC FILE REPRODUCTION
S-084 NOTARY PUBLIC
S-085 MAIOR SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT
S-086 MINOR SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT
SUBTOTAL-ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
(c) Fee restricted by Law
TOTAL TOTAL
FEE SERVICE
REVENUE COST
(31 141
$0 $9985
$0 $11.816
$675 $744
$0 $1
$0 St
$0 $9
$0 $1.350
$0 $56
$675 $23,962
TOTAL
PROFIT/
(SUBSIDY)
f5)
($9 9851
($11816'
($69
($1
($1'
($9'
($1350)
[$56)
($23,287)
PCT. RECOVERY
FROM FEES
ACTUAL SUGGEST
{ 6) f71
0.0% 100%
0.0% 100%
90.7% 100%
0.0% 100%
0.0% 100%
0.0% 100%
0.0% 100%
0.0% 100%
2.8%
POSSIBLE
NEW
REVENUE
/Bl
$10 000
$11800
SlOO
$0
$0
$0
$1400
$100
$23,400
(c)
(c)
(c)
Several administrative services are limited by State law, and others are recommended to be set at full cost recovery levels, including business license processing fees. 32 City of Anderson Cost of Services Study
207
Pg.33 CHAPTER IV - SERVICE REVENUE RECOMMENDATIONS
Summary of Personal Choice Services
The following Table summarizes the recommendations and suggestions made in this Chapter.
TABLE 6 - SUMMARY
TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL PCT. RECOVERY POSSIBLE
FEE SERVICE PROFIT/ FROM FEES NEW
SERVICE REVENUE COST fSUBSIDYl ACTUAL ISUGGEST REVENUE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES $270,004 $988,794 ($718,790} 27.3% VAR. $449,950 PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES $210,473 $363,458 ($152,985) 57.9% VAR. $128,100 RECREATION SERVICES $120,970 $369,288 ($248,318) 32.8% VAR. $0 MAINTENANCE SERVICES $28,790 $216,427 ($187,637) 13.3% VAR. $176,300 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES $675 $23,962 ($23,287} 2.8% VAR. $23,400 $630,912 $1,961,929 ($1,331,017} 32.2% $777?50
!fall the recommendations and suggestions made in this Chapter and in Appendix A are adopted, the City would raise $777,750 on an annual basis.
When calculating the possible new revenue, we want this number to be as realistic as possible.
Therefore, the Possible New Revenue is less than the Total Subsidies in the above schedule. This occurs for the following reasons:
Some services occur infrequently and so no revenue is projected. Other services are market sensitive. and therefore the fees and possible new revenues are projected to be less than the subsidies so that the fees fit into the market
Taxpayer Equity Achieved. By taking such positive actions, the City's financial picture would be improved, far more equity between taxpayers and fee-payers could be gained, and fairness between property-related and non-property-related services could be secured.
The above table shows that the City is subsidizing $1,331,017 of Personal Choice Services with City tax dollars. Should the City Council feel that tax dollars are insufficient, or use for different purposes, this chapter has shown that there are opportunities to either increase the user fees or !owe r the cost of Personal Choice Services.
A Master Fee Resolution
RCS recommends that the City adopt a Master Fee Resolution which the Finance Department updates and the City Council adopts annually. RCS will work with Finance to help implement this Resolution.
Future Increases for Inflation. In addition, it is recommended the City adopt a policy to increase the fees annually for inflation based upon the regional Consumer Price Index, calculated by the annual average change from the prior year as published by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 33 City of Anderson Cost of Services Study
208
Pg. 34 CHAPTER IV - SERVICE REVENUE RECOMMENDATIONS
Policy Regarding "New" Services
RCS also recommends that the City Council adopt a policy of not starting any new service without a cost analysis, using the costing approach utilized in this Report, so as to determine ways in which the service could be fee-financed, if at all possible. This approach could be used when considering new parks or public buildings, improved police protection, or any other desired function or service.
Available to answer questions
RCS is available to discuss the process and results with the City Council. In addition, we can share our experience of doing this for hundreds of cities as the City Council determines what action to take.
34 City of Anderson Cost of Services Study
209
Pg.35 CONCLUSION
CONCLUSION
Elimination of Subsidies
This Report highlights and recommends that most tax subsidies be eliminated as being unintentional. Service users thus can vote with their dollars and not use a service for which they are unwilling or unable to pay. Hidden subsidies, which have existed for many of the City's supposedly self-financed and self-supporting services, can now be re-evaluated.
Issues Involved
The basic issue involved in viewing the results of the analysis presented by this text is to what degree fees should be expected to support the costs of the services.
Or viewed another way, to what extent should general taxes be utilized to subsidize the difference between the costs of each service center and the revenue produced from fees paid by the user of that service'?
Pressure on Tax Money Use. The opposite side of this issue is the increasing pressure on the use of public tax monies. Tax monies have severely decreased for local government in California. lffees do not pay all costs. then taxes must make up the differences not paid for by fees generated by users of specific services, or those services are threatened with extinction.
Addressing of Issues by City Council
The City Council should address the principles and issues enumerated herein to determine where, and to what extent, taxes will be utilized to cover costs incurred in the provision of special services. This is the current nature of competition between deserving public services for the scarce tax dollar. Who gets the dollars•· Police or Public Works? City streets or persons wanting zone changes? Code Enforcement or Animal Control? This is the nature of the tough policy questions involved in being an elected official in local government today.
Specific Policy Alternatives to Be Answered. Once the above cost issues are determined then the City Council has four clear policy alternatives available as to the revenue/cost mix of each service center:
• Continue any tax subsidy which might be found.
• Eliminate the tax subsidy by increasing fees to cover all "costs reasonably borne". • Reduce costs by reducing the level of service.
• Decide on an appropriate level of tax subsidy, being aware that taxes are now limited in rate, base and, consequently, in amounts yielded and available. 35 City of Anderson Cost of Services Swdy
210
Pg. 36 CONCLUSION
Final Thoughts
The City has appropriately responded to the mandate and spirit of Proposition 4. It is utilizing the passage of Propositions 4, 26, and 218 and the attention given to them as an opportunity to review its financial strncture and philosophy, and to institute a businesslike cost control system, tailored to the City's needs, to supplement its governmental accounting and budgeting systems.
The cooperation, excellent support and data provided in accomplishment of the work reported herein speaks well of the way in which a City organization can adapt to the so-called "new realities" of California governmental finance.
36 City of Anderson Cost of Services Study
211
APPENDIX A - SUMMARY OF CURRENT FEES AND PROPOSED FEES
37 212
REF#: S-001
CURRENT FEE
$500 per permit
REF #:S-002
CURRENT FEE
$1,500 per permit
REF#: S-003
CURRENT FEE
None
REF#: S-004
CURRENT FEE
$800 per permit
REF #:S-005
CURRENT FEE
$250 per permit
REF#: S-006
CURRENT FEE
None
CITY OF ANDERSON
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
FY 2025-2026
TITLE: USE PERMIT (MINOR)
RECOMMENDED FEE
$2,395 per pennit
TITLE: USE PERMIT (MAJOR)
RECOMMENDED FEE
$5,565 per pennit
TITLE: USE PERMIT EXTENSION
TITLE: VARIANCE
RECOMMENDED FEE
$3,010 per pennit
RECOMMENDED FEE
$4,255 per permit
TITLE: DESIGN REVIEW
RECOMMENDED FEE
$3,81 O per permit
TITLE: PRE-DEVELOPMENT MEETING
RECOMMENDED FEE
$1.185 per meeting
1 38
January 29, 2026
213
REF#: S-007
CURRENT FEE
$3,500 per amendment
REF#: S-008
CURRENT FEE
$3,500 per permit
REF#: S-009
CURRENT FEE
$3,500 + Actual Cost
REF #:S-010
CURRENT FEE
None
REF#: S-011
CURRENT FEE
$450 review of report
REF#: S-012
CURRENT FEE
$1,500 per map review
CITY OF ANDERSON
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
FY 2025-2026
TITLE: GENERAUSPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT
RECOMMENDED FEE
$5,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside contract costs.
TITLE: ZONE CHANGE
RECOMMENDED FEE
$5,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside contract costs.
TITLE: ANNEXATION
RECOMMENDED FEE
Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside contract costs.
TITLE: CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION
RECOMMENDED FEE
$805 per exemption
TITLE: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
RECOMMENDED FEE
Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside contract costs.
TITLE: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
RECOMMENDED FEE
$8,635 per map review
2 39
January 29, 2026
214
REF#: S-013
CURRENT FEE
$2,600 + $20/lot
REF#: S-014
CURRENT FEE
$200 + Eng. Fees
REF#: S-015
CURRENT FEE
$300 per permit
REF#: S-016
CURRENT FEE
None
REF#: S-017
CURRENT FEE
None
REF #:S-018
CURRENT FEE
$2.000 per contract
CITY OF ANDERSON
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
FY 2025-2026
TITLE: TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
RECOMMENDED FEE
$16,360 up to 10 lots
More than 1 0 lots - Deposit determined by staff with charges at lhe fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside contract costs.
TITLE: PROPERTY LINE ADJUSMENT
RECOMMENDED FEE
$1,205 per permit
TITLE: TENTATIVE MAP EXTENSION
RECOMMENDED FEE
$3, 170 per permit
TITLE: CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
RECOMMENDED FEE
Deposil determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outsfde surveyor contract costs.
TITLE: CONDITIONAL CERT OF COMPLIANCE
RECOMMENDED FEE
Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside contract costs.
TITLE: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
RECOMMENDED FEE
Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside contract costs.
3 January 29, 2026
40 215
REF#: S-019
CURRENT FEE
Amendments (Staff) • $250
Amendments (PC/CC) - $750
REF#: S-020
CURRENT FEE
$400 per appeal
REF#: S-021
CURRENT FEE
CITY OF ANDERSON
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
FY 2025-2026
TITLE: PLANNING RELATED AMENDMENTS
TITLE: APPEAL
RECOMMENDED FEE
Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside contract costs.
RECOMMENDED FEE
$6,615 per appeal
TITLE: SHOPPING CART RETRIEVAL AND STORAGE
RECOMMENDED FEE
Actual cos! incurred by City at the then effective dollar hourly rate Actual cost incurred by City al the then effective dollar hourly rate for a City's Maintenance Worker, top step. for a City's Maintenance Worker, top step.
Initial Plan Submittal • $50
Plan Resubmittal • $25
REF#: S-022 TITLE: NEW SIGN PERMIT
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$155 per permit $1,855 per permit
REF #:S-023 TITLE: FACE CHANGE SIGN PERMIT
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
None $735 per permit
REF#: S-024 TITLE: FLOODPLAIN DETERM/ZONING CONFIRM
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$80 per letter $800 per letter
4 January 29, 2026
41 216
REF#: S-025
CURRENT FEE
None
REF#: S-026
CURRENT FEE
$50 per permit
REF#: S-027
CURRENT FEE
None
REF#: S-028
CURRENT FEE
None
REF#: S-029
CURRENT FEE
None
REF#: S-030
CURRENT FEE
None
CITY OF ANDERSON
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
FY 2025-2026
TITLE: ADDRESS/RE-ADDRESS
RECOMMENDED FEE
$1,050 per appllcatlon
TITLE: HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT
RECOMMENDED FEE
$305 per permit
TITLE: ADDITIONAL REVIEW AND INSPECTION
RECOMMENDED FEE
Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside contract costs.
TITLE: MISC PLANNING SERVICES
RECOMMENDED FEE
Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside contract costs.
TITLE: GENERAL PLAN MAINTENANCE
RECOMMENDED FEE
10% of Building & Safety Fees
TITLE: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TECHNOLOGY
RECOMMENDED FEE
6% of Building & Safety Fees
5 January 29. 2026
42 217
REF#: S-031
CURRENT FEE
None
REF#: S-032
CURRENT FEE
CITY OF ANDERSON
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
FY 2025-2026
TITLE: BUILDING PLAN CHECK/INSPECTION
RECOMMENDED FEE
See Appendix C of this report.
TITLE: ENCROACHMENT PERMITS
RECOMMENDED FEE
$10 + $53/hr (Miniumum of $63) per pennit
Overtime - $80/hr
Deposit detennined by staff based on charges al the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside contract costs.
REF#: S-033 TITLE: ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK/IMPROVEMENT
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Parcel Map/Improvement Plans - $125 deposit+ actual time Subdivision Map/Improvement Plans - Initial deposit euqal to 1.5% of construction valuation with charges based on actual time spent.
Public Improvement Inspections - Initial deposit equal to 2% of construciton valuation with charges based on actual time spent.
Various Grading Plan Check/Inspection fee - based on cubic yards $1,500 initial deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside contract costs. Additional reviews and Inspections would require additional deposits as necessary.
REF#: S-034 TITLE: ENGINEERING MAP CHECK
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$125 + The actual cost to the City for checking the map. Deposit determined by staff based on charges at the fully allocated Parcel Map/Improvement Plans - $125 lnilial Deposit with charges hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside contract based on actual lime spent. costs.
Subdivision Map/Improvement Plans - Initial Deposit equal to 1.5% of construction valuation with charges based on actual lime spent.
REF #:S-035 TITLE: TRANSPORTATION PERMIT
CURRENT FEE
Daily - $16 permit
Annual - $90 permit
RECOMMENDED FEE
$50 per permrt
6 43
January 29, 2026
218
REF#: S-036
CURRENT FEE
CITY OF ANDERSON
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
FY 2025-2026
TITLE: FALSE ALARM
RECOMMENDED FEE
Three False Alarms within 30 consecutive Days - $50
Five False Alarms within 90 consecutive Days - $100
Six False Alarms within 180 consecutive Days - $150
Firs! 3 alarms within a calendar year - no charge
4th alarm - $100
REF#: S-037
CURRENT FEE
$125 per application request
REF #:S-038
CURRENT FEE
$25 per review
REF#: S-039
CURRENT FEE
$10 per sign off
REF#: S-040
CURRENT FEE
None
REF #:S-041
CURRENT FEE
Permit - $45 for 3 Years
5th alarm - $200
6th and subsequent alarms - $300
TITLE: VEHICLE IMPOUND RELEASE
RECOMMENDED FEE
$225 per application request
TITLE: VEHICLE REPOSESSION PROCCESSING
RECOMMENDED FEE
$15 per review
(Limited by State Law)
TITLE: TICKET SIGN OFFS
RECOMMENDED FEE
$15 per sign off
TITLE: VIN VERIFICATION
RECOMMENDED FEE
$50 per VIN verification
TITLE: ALARM PERMIT APP/RENEWAL PROCESSING
RECOMMENDED FEE
Permit - $45 for 3 years
7 44
January 29, 2026
219
REF #:S-042
CURRENT FEE
$25 per permit
REF #:S-043
C!.!RBEl!II EEE
$30 per letter
REF#: S-044
CURRENT FEE
$30 per review + DOJ fees
REF#: S-045
CURRENT FEE
$150 per license
REF#: S-046
C!JBBEl!II Fi;;!;
$100 per gun + $2 per day
REF #:S-047
CURRENT FEE
$18 per print+ DOJ fees
CITY OF ANDERSON
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
FY 2025-2026
TITLE: REINSTATEMENT OF ALARM PERMIT
RECOMMENDED FEE
$45 per permit
TITLE: RECORD CLEARANCE LETTER
RECOMMEl!IDED FEE
$45 per letter
TITLE: POLICE BUS. BACKGROUND CHECK
RECOMMENDED FEE
$90 per review + OOJ fees
TITLE: SECONDHAND DEALER LICENSE
RECOMMEl!IDED FEE
$105 per license+ OOJ fees
TITLE: GUN STORAGE
RECOMMENDED FEE
$280 for first gun + $70 every gun after
TITLE: FINGERPRINT REQUEST
RECOMMENDED FEE
$30 per print plus any DOJ fees
8 45
January 29, 2026
220
REF#: S-048
CURRENT FEE
CITY OF ANDERSON
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
FY 2025-2026
TITLE: POLICE REPORT COPIES
$15/First 5 Pages + $1/Page thereafter
RECOMMENDED FEE
First 5 pages - free
REF #:S-049
CURRENT FEE
$1/Per incident
REF#: S-050
CURRENT FEE
Each page thereafter - $.20
(Limited by Public Records Act)
TITLE: LOG REPORTS
RECOMMENDED FEE
First 5 pages - free
Each page thereafter - $.20
(Limited by Public Records Act)
TITLE: COPY PHOTOS TO MEDIA DEVICE
$15/First 5 Photos+ $1/Photo thereafter
RECOMMENDED FEE
$5 per device
REF#: S-051 TITLE: ANIMAL CONTROL
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
See Appendix D of this report. No changes are recommended.
REF#: S-052 TITLE: PARKING CITATIONS
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
See Appendix E of this report. No changes are recommended.
REF #:S-053 TITLE: ADULT SPORTS - VOLLEYBALL
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$150/leam No Change
9 46
January 29, 2026
221
REF#: S-054
CURRENT FEE
$45 per participant
REF#: S-055
CURRENT FEE
CITY OF ANDERSON
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
FY 2025-2026
TITLE: YOUTH SPORTS • BASKETBALL
RECOMMENDED FEE
No Change
TITLE: SNAP BASKETBALL
$22.50 per participant with schoalrship funding from donations
RECOMMENDED FEE
No Change
REF#: S-056 TITLE: AQUATICS PROGRAM
CURRENT FEE RE;!:;QMMENDED FEE
$25flesson - private lessons
$2 - open swim
No Change
$45/two weeks - group lessons
YMCA Receives 30% of all revenues
REF#: S-057 TITLE: SUMMER CAMP
CURRENT FEE RECOMMEN!;!EQ FEE
$50 per week • 5 days/week No Change
Total Program Time: 4 weeks
REF#: S-058 TITLE: CONTRACT CLASSES
CURRENT FEE
70/30 split between city and contracted instructors
RECOMMENDEQ FEE
No Change
10 47
January 29, 2026
222
CITY OF ANDERSON
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
FY 2025-2026
REF #: S-059 TITLE: FACILITY/FIELD/PARK RENTALS
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Ampitheater • $500 Rental • $300 w/ electricity + lights See Appendix F of this report. $2,000 Ticket Event (open to public) • $750 Deposit
KC Grove #1 • $50 : KC Grove #2 -$50 : Cottonwood Grove • $75 Moose Grove - $50 : BBQ #1 - $75 : BBQ #2 . $50 Gazebo - $75 Riverview - $50
Field Rental - $100 Deposit - $75 Rental
AH Anderson River Park Facillities Event Fee • $200
Scout Hall - $250 w/$350 Cleaning Deposit
Arts & Crafts Room - $30/3 hours w/$75 clean:ng deposit Community Center - $300 w/$500 cleaning deposit
REF#: S-060 TITLE: SPLASH PAD
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Entire Facility - $400 4hr bt,ocks No Change
Splash Pad Gazebo (4 tables and gazebo cover) - $100 3hr blocks REF#: S-061 TITLE: ICE RINK
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Private Rentals No change
$200 per hour
Additional rental hours $50 per hour
Fire PiUHeater rental $100 for event
Admission $5 per person
REF #: S-062 TITLE: MOSQUITO SERENADE VENDOR
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
For-profit vendors• $150 per concert For-profit vendors. $225 per concert For-profit vendor only selling beverages - $75 per concert Non-profit vendors - $50 per concert
For-profit vendor only selling beverages - $115 per concert Non-profit vendors - $75 per concert
REF#: S-063
CURRENT FEE
None
TITLE: COMMUNITY BENCH PROGRAM
RECOMMENDED FEE
$2,400 per bench
11 48
January 29. 2026
223
REF #: S..064
CURRENT FEE
5/8 or 3/4" - $110
2" • $190
1 1/2" • $455
2" • $596
Over 2" - Cost
REF#: S..065
CURRENT FEE
Install. Fee - $40
per meter
Rental - $50/mo
REF#: S..066
CURRENT FEE
None
REF #: S..067
CURRENT FEE
$25 per inspection
REF#: S..068
CURRENT FEE
518 or 3/4" - $50
1" - $100
1 1/2" - $150
REF #: S..069
CURRENT FEE
$25 per turn on
CITY OF ANDERSON
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
FY 2025-2026
TITLE: WATER METER INSTALLATION
RECOMMENDED FEE
$91 O per meter plus actual costs of parts and supplies.
TITLE: TEMPORARY WATER METER RENTAL
RECOMMENDED FEE
$230 per meter
$50 rental per month
TITLE: TEMPORARY WATER METER MOVE
RECOMMENDED FEE
$70 per request
TITLE: WATER SYSTEM EXTENSION INSP.
RECOMMENDED FEE
$925 per inspection
TITLE: WATER METER TEST
RECOMMENDED FEE
$850 per test
Fee wi!I be refunded if the water meter is running fast.
TITLE: WATER TURN ON AFTER NONPAYMENT
RECOMMENDED FEE
$90 per turn on
12 January 29, 2026
49 224
REF #:S-070
CURRENT FEE
None
REF#: S-071
C!.!BBENIEEE
$50 per review
REF #:S-072
CURRENT FEE
$35 device per year
REF#: S-073
C!,!BBEt:tIE~E
None
REF#: S-074
CURR!;;NTFEE
$25 per inspection
REF #: S..075
CURRENT FEE
None
CITY OF ANDERSON
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
FY 2025-2026
TITLE: NON-EMERGENCY AFTER HOURS ON/OFF
RECOMMENDED FEE
$420 per tum on/off
TITLE: WATER METER TAMPERING
RECOMMENDED FEE
1st incident - $500
2nd incident- $1,000
3rd incident - $2,000
Within 60 days
TITLE: WATER BACKFLOW INSPECTION
RECOMMENDED FEE
$330 device per year
TITLE: GREASE TRAP INSPECTION
RECOMMENDED FEE
$105 per inspection
TITLE: GREASE TRAP INSPECTION FOLLOW-UP
RECOMMEf:tDED FEE
$120 per inspection
TITLE: NEW INDUSTRIAL WASTE USER PERMIT
RECOMMENDED FEE
$550 per permit
13 50
January 29, 2026
225
REF#: S-076
CURRENT FEE
None
REF#: S-077
CURRENT FEE
Actual Costs
REF #:S-078
CURRENT FEE
$150 per banner
REF#: S-079
CURRENT FEE
None
REF#: S-080
CURRENT FEE
None
REF #: S-081
CURRENT FEE
$25 per NSF check
CITY OF ANDERSON
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
FY 2025-2026
TITLE: INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT RENEWAL
RECOMMENDED FEE
$275 per permit
TITLE: ILLEGAL DISCHARGE
RECOMMENDED FEE
Charges al the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside contract costs.
$2,000 minimum
TITLE: BANNER POLE INSTALLATION
RECOMMENDED FEE
$195 per banner
TITLE: BUSINESS LICENSE PROCESSING
RECOMMENDED FEE
$55 per license review
TITLE: BUSINESS LICENSE RENEWAL
RECOMMENDED FEE
$8 per permit renewal
TITLE: NSF CHECK PROCESSING
RECOMMENDED FEE
$30 per NSF check
14 51
January 29, 2026
226
REF#: S-082
CURRENT FEE
CITY OF ANDERSON
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
FY 2025-2026
TITLE: DOCUMENT REPRODUCTION
First 10 pages free and $0.1 0 each page thereafter
RECOMMENDED FEE
First 10 pages - free
REF#: S-083
CURRENT FEE
None
REF#: S-084
CURRENT FEE
None
REF#: S-085
CURRENT FEE
None
REF #:S-086
CURRENT FEE
None
Each page thereafter - $.20
(Limited by Pubhc Records Act)
TITLE: ELECTRONIC FILE REPRODUCTION
RECOMMENDED FEE
$5 per device
(Limited by Public Records Act)
TITLE: NOTARY PUBLIC
RECOMMENDED FEE
$15 per signature
Fee is set by State Law
TITLE: MAJOR SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT
RECOMMENDED FEE
$270 per permit
TITLE: MINOR SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT
RECOMMENDED FEE
$55 per permit
15 52
January 29. 2026
227
APPENDIX B • REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEETS MATCHED WITH
COST DETAIL WORKSHEETS
53 228
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
USE PERMIT (MINOR)
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
PLANNING
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
PERMIT
Processing and reviewing a minor use permit application.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$500 per permit
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$2,395 per permit
$500.00
$2,392.33
$(1,892.33)
6 54
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-001
$3,000
$14,354
$(11,354)
20.90%
January 13, 2026
229
SERVICE
USE PERMIT (MINOR)
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
BLDG DIVISION BLDG INSP/PRMT TECH
ENGINEERING DEPPWDIR
PLANNING SENIOR PLANNER
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
TYPE UNIT TIME
1.50 2.00
6.50 TYPE SUBTOTAL 10.00
TOTALS 10,00
REFERENCE NO.
S-001
TOTAL UNITS
6 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$158.03 6 $948
$614.62 6 $3,688
$1,619.74 6 $9,718
$2,392.39 $14,354
$2,392.33 $14,354
January 13, 2026
230
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
USE PERMIT (MAJOR)
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
PLANNING
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
PERMIT
Processing and reviewing a major use permit application.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$1,500 per permit
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$5,565 per permit
$1,500.00
$5,565.50
$(4,065.50)
4 56
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-002
$6,000
$22,262
$(16,262)
26.95%
January 13, 2026
231
SERVICE
USE PERMIT (MAJOR)
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
BLDG DIVISION BLDG INSP/PRMT TECH
ENGINEERING DEPPWDIR
PLANNING SENIOR PLANNER
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
llfE UNIT TIME
1.50 3.00
18.00 TYPE SUBTOTAL 22.50
TOTALS 22.50
REFERENCE NO.
S-002
TOTAL UNITS
4 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$158.03 4 $632
$921 .93 4 $3,688
$4,485.42 4 $17,942
$5,565.38 $22,262
$5,565.50 $22,262
January 13, 2026
232
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
USE PERMIT EXTENSION
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
PLANNING
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
PERMIT
Processing and reviewing a request to extend a use permit.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
None
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$3,010 per permit
$0.00
$3,011.00
$(3,011.00)
58 TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-003
$0
$3,011
$(3,011)
0.00%
Janua,y 13. 2026
233
SERVICE
USE PERMIT EXTENSION
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
ENGINEERING OEPPWOIR
PLANNING SENIOR PLANNER
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
TYPE UNIT TIME
2.50 9.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 11.50
TOTALS 11.50
REFERENCE NO.
S-003
TOTAL UNITS
1 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS1
$768.28 1 $768
$2,242.71 1 $2,243
$3,010.99 $3,011
$3,011.00 $3,011
January 13, 2026
234
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE
VARIANCE
REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
PLANNING
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
PERMIT
Processing and reviewing a variance request for compliance.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$800 per permit
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$4,255 per permit
$800.00
$4,257.00
$(3,457.00)
1 TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
60 S-004
$800
$4,257
$(3,457)
18.79%
January 13, 2026
235
SERVICE
VARIANCE
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
ENGINEERING DEPPWDIR
PLANNING SENIOR PLANNER
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
TYPE UNIT TIME
2.50 14.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 16.50
TOTALS 16.50
t>l
REFERENCE NO.
S-004
TOTAL UNITS
1 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COSl
$768.28 1 $768
$3,488.66 1 $3,469
$4,256.94 $4,257
$4,257.00 $4,257
January 13, 2026
236
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
DESIGN REVIEW
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
PLANNING
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
PERMIT
Processing and reviewing project design and site plans.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$250 per permit
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$3,810 per permit
$250.00
$3,809.67
$(3,559.67)
3 62
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-005
$750
$11,429
$(10,679)
6.56%
January 13, 2026
237
SERVICE
DESIGN REVIEW
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
BLDG DIVISION BLDG INSP/PRMT TECH
ENGINEERING DEPPWDlR
ENGINEERING PWDIR
PLANNING SENIOR PLANNER
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
D:'.fs UNIT TIME
1.50 1.50
1.00 11.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 15.00
TOTALS 15.00
OJ
REFERENCE NO.
S-005
TOTAL UNITS
3 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$158.03 3 $474
$460.97 3 $1,383
$449.64 3 $1 ,349
$2,741.09 3 $8,223
$3,809.73 $11,429
$3,809.67 $11,429
January 13, 2026
238
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PRE-DEVELOPMENT MEETING
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
PLANNING
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
MEETING
SERVICE RECIPIENT
Reviewing meeting request and notes with user to ensure compliance.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
None
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$1 ,185 per meeting
$0.00
$1,183.40
$(1,183.40)
10 64
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-006
$0
$11,834
$(11,834)
0.00%
January 13, 2026
239
SERVICE
PRE-DEVELOPMENT MEETING
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
BLDG DIVISION BLDG INSP/PRMT TECH
ENGINEERING DEPPWDIR
ENGINEERING PWDIR
PLANNING SENIOR PLANNER
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
TYPE UNIT TIME
0.50 1.00
1.00 1.50
TYPE SUBTOTAL 4.00
TOTALS 4.00
O::>
REFERENCE NO.
S-006
TOTAL UNITS
10 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS1
$52.68 10 $527
$307.31 10 $3,073
$449.64 10 $4,496
$373.79 10 $3,738
$1,183.42 $11,834
$1,183.40 $11 ,834
January 13. 2026
240
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
GENERAUSPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
PLANNING
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Processing a request to amend a plan.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$3,500 per amendment
UNIT OF SERVICE
AMENDMENT
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1 TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-007
$0
$0
$0
0.00%
$5,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside contract costs.
January 13, 2026
66 241
SERVICE
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
GENERAUSPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME
0.00 TYPE SUBTOTAL 0,00
TOTALS 0.00
o7
REFERENCE NO.
S-007
TOTAL UNITS
1 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COSl
$0.00 0 $0
$0.00 $0
$0.00 $0
January 13, 2026
242
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
ZONE CHANGE
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
PLANNING
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Processing a zoning text or map change.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$3,500 per permit
UNIT OF SERVICE
PERMIT
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1 TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-008
$0
$0
$0
0.00%
$5,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside contract costs.
January 13, 2026
68 243
SERVICE
ZONE CHANGE
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
I:!fs UNIT TIME
0.00 TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.00
TOTALS 0.00
69 REFERENCE NO.
S-008
TOTAL UNITS
1 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COSl
$0.00 0 $0
$0.00 so
$0.00 $0
January 13. 2026
244
SERVICE
ANNEXATION
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
PLANNING
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Annexation
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$3,500 + Actual Cost
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
UNIT OF SERVICE
PERMIT
REFERENCE NO.
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
S-009
$0
$0
$0
TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside contract costs.
January 13, 2026
70 245
SERVICE
ANNEXATION
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
r!fs UNIT TIME
0.00 TYPE SUBTOTAL (UO
TOTALS 0.00
71 REFERENCE NO.
S-009
TOTAL UNITS
1 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$0.00 0 $0
$0.00 $0
$0.00 $0
January 13, 2026
246
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
PLANNING
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
EXEMPTION
SERVICE RECIPIENT
A review process in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
None
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$805 per exemption
$0.00
$806.00
$(806.00)
1 72
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-010
$0
$806
$(806)
0.00%
January 13, 2026
247
SERVICE
CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
ENGINEERING OEPPWDIR
PLANNING SENIOR PLANNER
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
TYPE UNIT TIME
1.00 2.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 3.00
TOTALS 3.00
REFERENCE NO.
S-010
TOTAL UNITS
1 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$307.31 1 $307
$498.38 1 $498
$805.69 $806
$806.00 $806
January 13, 2026
248
SERVICE
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
PLANNING
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
REFERENCE NO.
UNIT OF SERVICE
REPORT
SERVICE RECIPIENT
S-011
Review of environmental impact reports (EIR), negative declaration (ND), and environmental assessment.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$450 review of report
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT {SUBSIDY):
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT {SUBSIDY):
$0
$0
$0
TOTAL UNITS: 2 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside contract costs.
January 13, 2026
74 249
SERVICE
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
:r!fs UNIT TIME
0.00 TYPE SUBTOTAL 0,00
TOTALS o.oo
REFERENCE NO.
S-011
TOTAL UNITS
2 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COSl
$0.00 0 $0
$0.00 $0
$0.00 $0
January 13, 2026
250
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
PLANNING
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Reviewing a parcel map for compliance.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$1,500 per map review
UNIT OF SERVICE
MAP
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$8,635 per map review
$1,500.00
$8,634.50
$(7, 134.50)
2 76
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-012
$3,000
$17,269
$(14,269)
17.37%
January 13, 2026
251
SERVICE
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
BLDG DIVISION BLDG INSP/PRMT TECH
ENGINEERING DEPPWDIR
ENGINEERING PWDIR
PLANNING SENIOR PLANNER
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
TYPE UNIT TIME
1.50 3.00
3.50 24.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 32.00
TOTALS 32.00
77 REFERENCE NO.
S-012
TOTAL UNITS
2 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS1
$158.03 2 $316
$921.93 2 $1 ,844
$1,573.74 2 $3,147
$5,980.56 2 $11,961
$8,634.26 $17,269
$8,634.50 $17,269
January 13, 2026
252
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
PLANNING
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Reviewing a subdivision map and conditions.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$2,600 + $20/lot
UNIT OF SERVICE
MAP
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
$2,600.00
$16,359.00
$(13,759.00)
1 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$16,360 up to 10 lots
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-013
$2,600
$16,359
$(13,759)
15.89%
More than 10 lots - Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside contract costs.
January 13, 2026
78 253
SERVICE
TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
BLDG DIVISION BLDG INSP/PRMT TECH
ENGINEERING DEPPWDIR
ENGINEERING PWDIR
PLANNING SENIOR PLANNER
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
llfs UNIT TIME
1.50 3.00
3.50 55.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 63.00
TOTALS 63.00
79 REFERENCE NO.
S-013
TOTAL UNITS
1 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COSl
$158.03 1 $158
$921 .93 1 $922
$1,573.74 1 $1,574
$13,705.45 1 $13,705
$16,359.15 $16,359
$16,359.00 $16,359
January 13. 2026
254
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
PROPERTY LINE ADJUSMENT
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
PLANNING
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
PERMIT
Processing a request to adjust parcel boundaries.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$200 + Eng. Fees
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$1 ,205 per permit
$200.00
$1,203.20
$(1,003.20)
5 80
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-014
$1,000
$6,016
$(5,016)
16.62%
January 13, 2026
255
SERVICE
PROPERTY LINE ADJUSMENT
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
BLDG DIVISION BLOG INSP/PRMT TECH
ENGINEERING OEPPWDIR
PLANNING SENIOR PLANNER
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
~ UNIT TIME
0.50 0.50
4.00 TYPE SUBTOTAL 5.00
TOTALS 5.00
81 REFERENCE NO.
S-014
TOTAL UNITS
5 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS1
$52.68 5 $263
$153.66 5 $768
$996.76 5 $4.984
$1,203.10 $6,016
$1,203.20 $6,016
January 13. 2026
256
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
TENTATIVE MAP EXTENSION
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
PLANNING
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
PERMIT
Processing a time extension for an approved map.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$300 per permit
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$3, 170 per permit
$300.00
$3,169.00
$(2,869.00)
1 82
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S..015
$300
$3,169
$(2,869)
9.47%
January 13, 2026
257
SERVICE
TENTATIVE MAP EXTENSION
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
BLDG DIVISION BLDG INSP/PRMT TECH
ENGINEERING DEP PWDIR
PLANNING SENIOR PLANNER
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
TYPE UNIT TIME
1.50 2.50
9.00 TYPE SUBTOTAL 13.00
TOTALS 13.00
83 REFERENCE NO.
S-015
TOTAL UNITS
1 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$158.03 1 $158
$768.28 1 $768
$2,242.71 1 $2,243
$3,169.02 $3,169
$3,169.00 $3,169
January 13, 2026
258
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
PLANNING
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Reviewing parcel history to issue a certificate.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
None
UNIT OF SERVICE
CERTIFICATE
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOT AL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$0.00
$3,169.00
$(3, 169.00)
1 TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-016
$0
$3,169
$(3, 169)
0.00%
Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside surveyor contract costs.
January 13, 2026
84 259
SERVICE
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
BLDG DIVISION BLDG INSP/PRMT TECH
ENGINEERING DEP PWDIR
PLANNING SENIOR PLANNER
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
TYPE UNIT TIME
1.50 2.50
9.00 TYPE SUBTOTAL 13.00
TOTALS 13.00
85 REFERENCE NO.
S-016
TOTAL UNITS
1 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS1
$158.03 1 $158
$768.28 1 $768
$2,242.71 1 $2,243
$3,169.02 $3,169
$3,169.00 $3,169
January 13, 2026
260
SERVICE
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
REFERENCE NO.
CONDITIONAL CERT OF COMPLIANCE
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
PLANNING
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
CERTIFICATE
SERVICE RECIPIENT
S-017
Review of application to determine if applicant will receive a temporary document stating that a parcel created illegally may become legal.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
None
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
$0
$0
$0
TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside contract costs.
January 13, 2026
86 261
SERVICE
CONDITIONAL CERT OF COMPLIANCE
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average ofTotal Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
TYPE UNIT TIME
0.00 TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.00
TOTALS 0.00
o,
REFERENCE NO,
S-017
TOTAL UNITS
1 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS1
$0.00 0 $0
$0.00 so
$0.00 $0
January 13, 2026
262
SERVICE
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
REFERENCE NO.
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
PLANNING
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
CONTRACT
SERVICE RECIPIENT
Processing a development agreement for approval.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$2,000 per contract
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
S-018
$0
$0
$0
TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside contract costs.
January 13. 2026
88 263
SERVICE
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
n:eg UNIT TIME
0.00 TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.00
TOTALS o.oo
REFERENCE NO.
S-018
TOTAL UNITS
1 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$0.00 0 $0
$0.00 so
$0.00 $0
January 13, 2026
264
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO,
PLANNING RELATED AMENDMENTS
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
PLANNING
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
AMENDMENT
Processing and reviewing updates to planning codes or plans.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
Amendments (Staff) - $250
Amendments (PC/CC) - $750
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$250.00
$5,565.50
$(5,315.50)
2 TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-019
$500
$11,131
$(10,631)
4.49%
Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside contract costs.
January 13, 2026
90 265
SERVICE
PLANNING RELATED AMENDMENTS
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
BLDG DIVISION BLDG INSP/PRMT TECH
ENGINEERING DEPPWOIR
PLANNING SENIOR PlANNER
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
neg UNIT TIME
1.50 3.00
18.00 TYPE SUBTOTAL 22.50
TOTALS 22:.50
1:11
REFERENCE NO.
S-019
TOTAL UNITS
2 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL C0S1
$158.03 2 $316
$921.93 2 $1,844
$4,485.42 2 $8,971
$5,565.38 $11 ,131
$5,585.150 $11,131
January 13, 2026
266
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE
APPEAL
REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
PLANNING
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
APPEAL
SERVICE RECIPIENT
Processing a filed appeal to the planning comission or city council.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$400 per appeal
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$6,615 per appeal
$400.00
$6,616.00
$(6,216.00)
1 92
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-020
$400
$6,616
$(6,216)
6.05%
January 13, 2026
267
SERVICE
APPEAL
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
BLDG DIVISION BLDG INSP/PRMT TECH
ENGINEERING DEP PWDIR
ENGINEERING PWDIR
PLANNING SENIOR PLANNER
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
D'..!!!;. UNIT TIME
1.50 3.00
4.00 15.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 23.50
TOTALS 23.50
REFERENCE NO.
S-020
TOTAL UNITS
1 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$158.03 1 $158
$921.93 1 $922
$1,798.56 1 $1.799
$3,737.85 1 $3,738
$6,616.37 $6,616
$6,616.00 $6,616
January 13. 2026
268
SERVICE
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SHOPPING CART RETRIEVAL AND STORAGE
REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
PLANNING
UNIT OF SERVICE
APPLICATION
SERVICE RECIPIENT
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Processing records for retrieval and storage of carts in public zones.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
S-021
Actual cost incurred by City at the then effective dollar hourly rate for a City's Maintenance Worker, top step.
Initial Plan Submittal - $50
Plan Resubmittal - $25
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
$0
$0
$0
TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
Actual cost incurred by City at the then effective dollar hourly rate for a City's Maintenance Worker, top step.
January 13, 2026
94 269
SERVICE
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SHOPPING CART RETRIEVAL AND STORAGE
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME
0.00 TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.00
TOTALS 0.00
REFERENCE NO.
S-021
TOTAL UNITS
1 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$0.00 0 so
$0.00 $0
$0.00 $0
January 13, 2026
270
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
NEW SIGN PERMIT
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
PLANNING
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Reviewing new signage for code compliance.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$155 per permit
UNIT OF SERVICE
PERMIT
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE ANO COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOT AL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$1 ,855 per permit
$155.00
$1,855.13
$(1,700.13)
15 96
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-022
$2,325
$27,827
$(25,502)
8.36%
January 13, 2026
271
SERVICE
NEW SIGN PERMIT
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
BLDG DIVISION BLDG INSP/PRMT TECH
ENGINEERING DEP PWDIR
PLANNING SENIOR PLANNER
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
TYPE UNIT TIME
0.50 1.00
6.00 TYPE SUBTOTAL 7.50
TOTALS 7.50
97 REFERENCE NO.
S-022
TOTAL UNITS
15 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$52.68 15 $790
$307.31 15 $4,610
$1 .495.14 15 $22,427
$1,855.13 $27,827
$1,855.13 $27,827
January 13, 2026
272
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
FACE CHANGE SIGN PERMIT
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
PLANNING
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
APPLICATION
Reviewing replacement signage and updating records.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
None
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$735 per permit
$0.00
$733.80
$(733.80)
5 98
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-023
$0
$3,669
$(3,669)
0.00%
January 13, 2026
273
SERVICE
FACE CHANGE SIGN PERMIT
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
BLDG DIVISION BLDG INSP/PRMT TECH
ENGINEERING DEPPWDIR
PL.ANNING SENIOR PLANNER
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
TYPE UNIT TIME
0.50 1.00
1.50 TYPE SUBTOTAL 3.00
TOTALS 3.00
REFERENCE NO.
S.023
TOTAL UNITS
5 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COSl
$52.68 5 $263
$307.31 5 $1 ,537
$373.79 5 $1 ,869
$733.78 $3,669
$733.80 $3,669
January 13, 2026
274
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE ANO COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
FLOODPLAIN OETERM/ZONING CONFIRM
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
PLANNING
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Reviewing site details to confirm status.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$80 per letter
UNIT OF SERVICE
LETTER
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE ANO COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$800 per letter
$80.00
$800.33
$(720.33)
3 100
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-024
$240
$2,401
$(2,161)
10.00%
January 13, 2026
275
SERVICE
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
FLOODPLAIN DETERM/ZONING CONFIRM
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION llf& UNIT TIME
BLDG DIVISION BLDG INSP/PRMT TECH 0.50
PLANNING SENIOR PLANNER 3.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 3.50
TOTALS 3.50
1U1
REFERENCE NO.
S-024
TOTAL UNITS
3 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$52.68 3 $158
$747.57 3 $2,243
$800.25 $2,401
$800.33 $2,401
January 13, 2026
276
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE
ADDRESS/RE-ADDRESS
REFERENCE NO.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
PLANNING
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
APPLICATION
Processing an address assignment or correction.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
None
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$1 ,050 per application
$0.00
$1,049.50
$(1,049.50)
2 102
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-025
$0
$2,099
$(2,099)
0.00%
January 13, 2026
277
SERVICE
ADDRESS/RE-ADDRESS
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
BLDG DIVISION BLDG INSP/PRMT TECH
PLANNING SENIOR PLANNER
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
llf& UNIT TIME
0.50 4.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 4.50
TOTALS 4.SO
REFERENCE NO,
S-025
TOTAL UNITS
2 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS1
$52.68 2 $105
$996.76 2 $1 ,994
$1,049.44 $2,099
$1,049.50 $2,099
January 13, 2026
278
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE ANO COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
PLANNING
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
PERMIT
Processing a home occupation permit application.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$50 per permit
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE ANO COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$305 per permit
$50.00
$307.30
$(257.30)
40 104
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-026
$2,000
$12,292
$(10,292)
16.27%
January 13, 2026
279
SERVICE
HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
ENGINEERING DEPPW DIR
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
TYPE UNIT TIME
1.00 TYPE SUBTOTAL 1.00
TOTALS 1.00
REFERENCE NO,
S-026
TOTAL UNITS
40 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$307.31 40 $12,292
$307.31 $12,292
$307.30 $12,292
January 13, 2026
280
SERVICE
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
REFERENCE NO.
ADDITIONAL REVIEW AND INSPECTION
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
PLANNING
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Reviewing additional submittals or sites.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
None
UNIT OF SERVICE
INSPECTION
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
S-027
$0
$0
$0
TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside contract costs.
January 13. 2026
106
281
SERVICE
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025~2026
ADDITIONAL REVIEW AND INSPECTION
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION r!fE UNIT TIME
0.00 TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.00
TOTALS 0.00
107
REFERENCE NO.
S-027
TOTAL UNITS
1 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS1
$0.00 0 $0
$0.00 $0
$0.00 $0
January 13. 2026
282
SERVICE
MISC PLANNING SERVICES
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
PLANNING
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
REFERENCE NO.
UNIT OF SERVICE
APPLICATION
SERVICE RECIPIENT
Processing planning requests not listed elsewhere within report.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
None
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
S-028
$0
$0
$0
TOTAL UNITS: 1 PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00%
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside contract costs.
January 13, 2026
108
283
SERVICE
MISC PLANNING SERVICES
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
TYPE UNIT TIME
0.00 TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.00
TOTALS o.oo
REFERENCE NO.
S-028
TOTAL UNITS
1 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$0.00 0 $0
$0.00 $0
$0.00 $0
January 13, 2026
284
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
GENERAL PLAN MAINTENANCE
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
PLANNING
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
PERMIT
SERVICE RECIPIENT
Update and maintenance of the City's General Plan due to changes from development.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
None
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
$0.00
$50,000.00
$(50,000.00)
1 TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
10% of Building & Safety Fees
110
S-029
$0
$50,000
$(50,000)
0.00%
January 13, 2026
285
SERVICE
GENERAL PLAN MAINTENANCE
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
PLANNING
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
TYPE UNIT TIME
$1 Mil Over 20 Years 0.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.00
TOTALS 0.00
111
REFERENCE NO.
5-029
TOTAL UNITS
1 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS1
$50,000.00 1 $50,000
$50,000.00 $50,000
$50,000.00 $50,000
January 13, 2026
286
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE ANO COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TECHNOLOGY
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
PLANNING
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
PERMIT
SERVICE RECIPIENT
Update and replacement of technology equipment or software for Community Development.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
None
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
$0.00
$30,000.00
$(30,000.00)
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
6% of Building & Safety Fees
112
S-030
$0
$30,000
$(30,000)
0.00%
January 13, 2026
287
SERVICE
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TECHNOLOGY
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
REFERENCE NO.
S-030
TOTAL UNITS
1 DEPARTMENT POSITION UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING Technology Expenses 0.00 $30,000.00 $30,000
TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.00 $30,000.00 $30,000
TOTALS 0.00 $30,000.00 $30,000
113
January 13, 2026
288
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
BUILDING PLAN CHECK/INSPECTION
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
BUILDING
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
See Appendix C of this report.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
None
UNIT OF SERVICE
INSPECTION
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
$211,712.00
$514,116.00
$(302,404.00)
1 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
See Appendix C of this report.
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
114
S-031
$211,712
$514,116
$(302,404)
41.18%
January 13, 2026
289
SERVICE
BUILDING PLAN CHECK/INSPECTION
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average ofTotal Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
BLDG DIVISION BLDGINSP
BLDG DIVISION BLDG INSP/PRMT TECH
BLDG DIVISION SR BLDG INSP
BLDG DIVISION
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
n:es UNIT TIME
Remainder Of Time 1,218.00
Remainder Of Time 1,164.00
Remainder Of Time 1,116.50
Prof Services 0.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 3,498.50
TOTALS 3,493.SG
115
REFERENCE NO.
S-031
TOTAL UNITS
1 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS1
$179,058.18 1 $179,058
$122,627.40 1 $122,627
$197,430.70 1 $197,431
$15,000.00 1 $15.000
$514,116.28 $514,116
$514,116.00 $514,116
January 13. 2026
290
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
ENCROACHMENT PERMITS
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
PERMIT
Processing a right-of-way encroachment permit application.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$10 + $53/hr (Miniumum of $63) per permit
Overtime - $80/hr
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
$8,644.00
$50,122.00
$(41,478.00)
1 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-032
$8,644
$50,122
$(41,478)
17.25%
Deposit determined by staff based on charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside contract costs.
January 13, 2026
116
291
SERVICE
ENCROACHMENT PERMITS
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
ENGINEERING DEPPWDIR
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
I!'.fE UNIT TIME
10% 163.10
TYPE SUBTOTAL 163.10
TOTALS 163.10
117
REFERENCE NO.
S-032
TOTAL UNITS
1 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS1
$50,122.26 1 $50,122
$50,122.26 $50,122
$50,122.00 $50,122
January 13, 2026
292
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK/IMPROVEMENT
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
INSPECTION
SERVICE RECIPIENT
Reviewing of maps, grading plan check and inspection, improvement plan check and inspection.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
Parcel Map/Improvement Plans- $125 deposit+ actual time S-033
Subdivision Map/Improvement Plans - Initial deposit euqal to 1.5% of construction valuation with charges based on actual time spent.
Public Improvement Inspections - Initial deposit equal to 2% of construciton valuation with charges based on actual time spent.
Various Grading Plan Check/Inspection fee - based on cubic yards UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
$25,933.00
$161,974.00
$(136,041.00)
1 TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$25,933
$161,974
$(136,041)
16.01%
$1,500 initial deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside contract costs. Additional reviews and inspections would require additional deposits as necessary.
January 13, 2026
118
293
SERVICE
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK/IMPROVEMENT
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION Ilfs UNIT TIME
ENGINEERING DEPPWDIR 25% 407.75
ENGINEERING PWDIR 5% 81.55
TYPE SUBTOTAL 489.30
TOTALS 489.30
11~
REFERENCE NO.
S-033
TOTAL UNITS
1 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS1
$125,305.65 1 $125,306
$36,668.14 1 $36,668
$161,973.79 $161,974
$161,974.00 $161,974
January 13, 2026
294
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
ENGINEERING MAP CHECK
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Reviewing of civil plans only
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
UNIT OF SERVICE
INSPECTION
$125 + The actual cost to the City for checking the map.
SERVICE RECIPIENT
Parcel Map/Improvement Plans - $125 Initial Deposit with charges based on actual time spent.
S.034
Subdivision Map/Improvement Plans - Initial Deposit equal to 1.5% of construction valuation with charges based on actual time spent.
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1 TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOT AL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
$0
$0
$0
0.00%
Deposit determined by staff based on charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside contract costs.
January 13, 2026
120
295
SERVICE
ENGINEERING MAP CHECK
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
TYPE UNIT TIME
0.00 TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.00
TOTALS 0.00
121
REFERENCE NO.
S-034
TOTAL UNITS
1 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$0.00 0 $0
$0.00 $0
so.oo $0
January 13, 2026
296
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
TRANSPORTATION PERMIT
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Processing of transportation permit.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
Daily -$16 permit
Annual - $90 permit
UNIT OF SERVICE
PERMIT
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$50 per permit
$16.00
$52.24
$(36.24)
50 122
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-035
$800
$2,612
$(1,812)
30.63%
January 13, 2026
297
SERVICE
TRANSPORTATION PERMIT
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
ENGINEERING DEPPWDIR
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
:r!fE UNIT TIME
0.17 TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.17
TOTALS 0.17
REFERENCE NO.
S-035
TOTAL UNITS
50 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS1
$52.24 50 $2,612
$52.24 $2,612
$52.24 $2,612
January 13, 2026
298
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
FALSE ALARM
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
POLICE
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Reviewing a false alarm event for billing.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
UNIT OF SERVICE
RESPONSE
Three False Alarms within 30 consecutive Days - $50
Five False Alarms within 90 consecutive Days - $100
Six False Alarms within 180 consecutive Days - $150
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$50.00
$96.99
$(46.99)
700
First 3 alarms within a calendar year - no charge
4th alarm - $100
5th alarm - $200
6th and subsequent alarms - $300
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
124
S-036
$35,000
$67,893
$(32,893)
51.55%
January 13, 2026
299
SERVICE
FALSE ALARM
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
UNIFORM FIELD POUCEOFCR
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
TYPE UNIT TIME
0.50 TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.50
TOTALS 0.50
REFERENCE NO.
S-036
TOTAL UNITS
700
UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$96.99 700 $67,893
$96.99 $67,893
$96.99 $67,893
January 13, 2026
300
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
VEHICLE IMPOUND RELEASE
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
POLICE
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
APPLICATION
Processing a request to release a vehicle to its owner.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$125 per application request
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE ANO COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$225 per application request
$125.00
$223.96
$(98.96)
1,250
126
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-037
$156,250
$279,950
$(123,700)
55.81%
January 13. 2026
301
SERVICE
VEHICLE IMPOUND RELEASE
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
UNIFORM FIELD POLICEOFCR
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
n:eg UNIT TIME
1.00 SUPPORT SERVICES RECORDS CLERK/ANALYST 0.33
TYPE SUBTOTAL 1.33
TOTALS 1.3-3
127
REFERENCE NO.
S-037
TOTAL UNITS
1,250
UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS1
$193.98 1,250 $242,475
$29.98 1,250 $37,475
$223.96 $279,950
$223.96 $279,950
January 13, 2026
302
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE ANO COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
VEHICLE REPOSESSION PROCCESSING
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
POLICE
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
APPLICATION
Processing a request to release a repossessed vehicle.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$25 per review
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$15 per review
(Limited by State Law)
$25.00
$15.46
$9.54
24 128
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-038
$600
$371
$229
161.73%
January 13, 2026
303
SERVICE
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
VEHICLE REPOSESSION PROCCESSING
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION ~ UNIT TIME
SUPPORT SERVICES RECORDS CLERK/ANALYST 0.17
TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.17
TOTALS 0.17
REFERENCE NO.
S-038
TOTAL UNITS
24 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS1
$15.45 24 $371
$15,45 $371
$15.46 $371
Janua,y 13, 2026
304
SERVICE
TICKET SIGN OFFS
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
POLICE
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Processing a ticket sign-off.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$10 per sign off
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
REFERENCE NO.
UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
SIGN OFF
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
$10.00 TOTAL REVENUE:
$22.72 TOTAL COST:
$(12.72) TOT AL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
500 PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-039
$5,000
$11,360
$(6,360)
44.01°/4
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 75%
$15 per sign off
January 13, 2026
130
305
SERVICE
TICKET SIGN OFFS
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
~ UNIT TIME
SUPPORT SERVICES RECORDS CLERK/ANALYST 0.25
TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.25
TOTALS 0.25
, .,1
REFERENCE NO.
S-039
TOTAL UNITS
500
UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$22.72 500 $11,360
$22.72 $11,360
$22.72 $11,360
January 13, 2026
306
SERVICE
VIN VERIFICATION
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
POLICE
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
REFERENCE NO.
UNIT OF SERVICE
VERIFICATION
SERVICE RECIPIENT
S-040
Verification of a vehicle identification number (VIN) to confirm the vehicle's identity and match it to ownership and registration records.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
None
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$50 per VIN verification
$0.00
$49.00
$(49.00)
1 132
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
$0
$49
$(49)
0.00%
January 13, 2026
307
SERVICE
VIN VE RI FICA TION
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
UNIFORM FIELD POLICEOFCR
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
.!1fg UNIT TIME
0.25 TYPE SUBTOTAL 0,25
TOTALS 0.25
REFERENCE NO.
S-040
TOTAL UNITS
1 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$48.50 1 $49
$48.50 $49
$49.00 $49
January 13, 2026
308
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
ALARM PERMIT APP/RENEWAL PROCESSING
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
POLICE
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
PERMIT
Processing an alarm permit application or renewal.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
Permit - $45 for 3 Years
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
Permit - $45 for 3 years
$45.00
$45.00
$0.00
1 134
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-041
$45
$45
$0
100.00%
January 13, 2026
309
SERVICE
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
ALARM PERMIT APP/RENEWAL PROCESSING
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME
SUPPORT SERVICES RECORDS CLERK/ANALYST 0.50
TYPE SUBTOTAL 0 .. 50
TOTALS 0.50
REFERENCE NO.
S-041
TOTAL UNITS
1 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS1
$45.43 1 $45
$45.43 $45
$45.00 $45
January 13, 2026
310
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO,
REINSTATEMENT OF ALARM PERMIT
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
POLICE
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Processing an alarm permit reinstatement.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$25 per permit
UNIT OF SERVICE
PERMIT
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOT AL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$45 per permit
$25.00
$45.45
$(20.45)
20 136
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-042
$500
$909
$(409)
55.01%
January 13, 2026
311
SERVICE
REINSTATEMENT OF ALARM PERMIT
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
TYPE UNITTIME
SUPPORT SERVICES RECORDS CLERK/ANALYST 0.50
TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.50
TOTALS 0.50
137
REFERENCE NO.
S-042
TOTAL UNITS
20 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$45.43 20 $909
$45.43 $909
$45.45 $909
January 13, 2026
312
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
RECORD CLEARANCE LETTER
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
POLICE
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
LETTER
Processing a request for a record clearance letter.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$30 per letter
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$45 per letter
$30.00
$45.40
$(15.40)
5 138
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-043
$150
$227
$(77)
66.08°/4
January 13, 2026
313
SERVICE
RECORD CLEARANCE LETTER
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025w2026
!:!es UNIT TIME
SUPPORT SERVICES RECORDS CLERK/ANALYST 0.50
TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.50
TOTALS (I.ISO
REFERENCE NO.
S-043
TOTAL UNITS
5 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$45.43 5 $227
$45.43 $227
$45.40 $227
January 13, 2026
314
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
POLICE BUS. BACKGROUND CHECK
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
POLICE
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
APPLICATION
SERVICE RECIPIENT
Reviewing business background information inclusive of new and renewal applications.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$30 per review + DOJ fees
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$90 per review + DOJ fees
$30.00
$91.00
$(61.00)
2 140
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S.044
$60
$182
$(122)
32.97%
January 13, 2026
315
SERVICE
POLICE BUS. BACKGROUND CHECK
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
TYPE UNIT TIME
SUPPORT SERVICES RECORDS CLERK/ANALYST 1.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 1.00
TOTALS 1.00
141
REFERENCE NO.
S-044
TOTAL UNITS
2 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COSl
$90.86 2 $182
$90.86 $182
$91.00 $182
January 13, 2026
316
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
SECONDHAND DEALER LICENSE
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
POLICE
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
LICENSE
SERVICE RECIPIENT
Processing a new or renewal for a secondhand dealer license application.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$150 per license
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$105 per license+ DOJ fees
$150.00
$105.00
$45.00
1 142
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-045
$150
$105
$45
142.86%
January 13, 2026
317
SERVICE
SECONDHAND DEALER LICENSE
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
SUPPORT SERVICES SUP/ADMIN DIV SUPV
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
~ UNIT TIME
1.00 TYPE SUBTOTAL 1.00
TOTALS 1.00
143
REFERENCE NO.
S-045
TOTAL UNITS
1 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$105.47 1 $105
$105.47 $105
$105.00 $105
January 13, 2026
318
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
GUN STORAGE
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
POLICE
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
STORAGE
Processing firearm intake, inventory, and storage.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$100 per gun+ $2 per day
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$280 for first gun + $70 every gun after
$100.00
$229.00
$(129.00)
4 144
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-046
$400
$916
$(516)
43.67%
January 13, 2026
319
SERVICE
GUN STORAGE
NOTE
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION ~ UNIT TIME
SUPPORT SERVICES CMTY SVC OFCR First Gun 2.00
SUPPORT SERVICES RECORDS CLERK/ANALYST First Gun 1.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 3.00
SUPPORT SERVICES CMTY SVC OFCR Each Additional Gun 0.50 SUPPORT SERVICES RECORDS CLERK/ANALYST Each Additional Gun 0.25 TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.75
TOTALS 3.75
REFERENCE NO.
S-046
TOTAL UNITS
4 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$190.90 3 $573
$90.86 3 $273
$281.76 $845
$47.73 1 $48
$22.72 1 $23
$70.45 $70
$229.00 $916
January 13, 2026
320
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
FINGERPRINT REQUEST
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
POLICE
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
FINGERPRINT
Processing a fingerprinting request and record creation.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$18 per print + DOJ fees
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$30 per print plus any DOJ fees
$18.00
$30.00
$(12.00)
1 146
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-047
$18
$30
$(12)
60.00%
January 13, 2026
321
SERVICE
FINGERPRINT REQUEST
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
TYPE UNIT TIME
SUPPORT SERVICES RECORDS CLERK/ANALYST 0.33
TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.33
TOTALS 0.33
14(
REFERENCE NO.
S-047
TOTAL UNITS
1 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$29.98 1 $30
$29.98 $30
$30.00 $30
January 13, 2026
322
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
POLICE REPORT COPIES
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
POLICE
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Processing a request for police report copies.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$15/First 5 Pages + $1 /Page thereafter
UNIT OF SERVICE
COPIES
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
First 5 pages - free
Each page thereafter - $.20
(Limited by Public Records Act)
$15.00
$0.91
$14.09
750
148
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOT AL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-048
$11,250
$683
$10,567
1,647.14%
January 13, 2026
323
SERVICE
POLICE REPORT COPIES
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
~ UNIT TIME
SUPPORT SERVICES RECORDS CLERK/ANALYST 0.01
TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.01
TOTALS 0.01
149
REFERENCE NO.
S-048
TOTAL UNITS
750
UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS1
$0.91 750 $683
$0.91 $683
$0.91 $683
January 13, 2026
324
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
LOG REPORTS
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
POLICE
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Processing a request for log report copies.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$1 /Per incident
UNIT OF SERVICE
REPORTS
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
First 5 pages - free
Each page thereafter - $.20
(Limited by Public Records Act)
$1 .00
$0.91
$0.09
750
150
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-049
$750
$683
$67
109.81%
January 13, 2026
325
SERVICE
LOG REPORTS
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
TYPE UNIT TIME
SUPPORT SERVICES RECORDS CLERK/ANALYST 0.01
TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.01
TOTALS 0.01
151
REFERENCE NO.
S-049
TOTAL UNITS
750
UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COSl
$0.91 750 $683
$0.91 $683
$0.91 $683
January 13, 2026
326
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
COPY PHOTOS TO MEDIA DEVICE
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
POLICE
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
DEVICE
Processing a request to transfer data to media devices.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$15/First 5 Photos + $1 /Photo thereafter
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$5 per device
$15.00
$2.75
$12.25
20 152
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-050
$300
$55
$245
545.45%
January 13, 2026
327
SERVICE
COPY PHOTOS TO MEDIA DEVICE
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
TYPE UNIT TIME
SUPPORT SERVICES RECORDS CLERK/ANALYST 0.03
TYPE SUBTOTAL 0,03
TOTALS 0.03
15J
REFERENCE NO.
S-050
TOTAL UNITS
20 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS1
$2.73 20 $55
$2.73 $55
$2.75 $55
January 13, 2026
328
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO,
ANIMAL CONTROL
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
POLICE
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT
Services provided and enforced in response to local animal laws.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
See Appendix D of this report.
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
$0.00
$0.00
$0,00
1 TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
No changes are recommended.
154
S-051
$0
$0
$0
0.00%
January 13, 2026
329
SERVICE
ANIMAL CONTROL
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
~ UNIT TIME
0.00 TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.00
TOTALS 0.00
REFERENCE NO.
S-051
TOTAL UNITS
1 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$0.00 0 $0
$0.00 $0
$0.00 $0
January 13, 2026
330
SERVICE
PARKING CITATIONS
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
POLICE
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
REFERENCE NO.
UNIT OF SERVICE
CITATIONS
SERVICE RECIPIENT
S-052
Enforcement of parking regulations, issuing citations for violations, and processing related payments and appeals.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
See Appendix E of this report.
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
No changes are recommended.
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1 156
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
$0
$0
$0
0.00%
January 13, 2026
331
SERVICE
PARKING CITATIONS
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
D'.fs. UNIT TIME
0.00 TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.00
TOTALS 0.00
157
REFERENCE NO.
S-052
TOTAL UNITS
1 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$0.00 0 $0
$0.00 $0
$0.00 $0
January 13, 2026
332
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
ADULT SPORTS - VOLLEYBALL
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY SERVICES
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
TEAM
Processing of applications to participate in adult volleyball.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$150/team
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
No Change
$3,150.00
$9,045.00
$(5,895.00)
1 158
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-053
$3,150
$9,045
$(5,895)
34.83%
January 13, 2026
333
SERVICE
ADULT SPORTS • VOLLEYBALL
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
RECREATION RECSUPV
RECREATION
RECREATION
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
TYPE UNIT TIME
25.01 Materials & Supplies 0.00
Contract Cost 0.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 25.01
TOTALS 25.01
REFERENCE NO.
S-053
TOTAL UNITS
1 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$5,497.20 1 $5,497
$300.00 1 $300
$3,248.02 1 $3,248
$9,045.22 $9,045
$9,045.00 $9,045
January 13, 2026
334
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
YOUTH SPORTS • BASKETBALL
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY SERVICES
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
PARTICIPANT
Processing of applications to participate in youth basketball.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$45 per participant
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
$8,010.00
$22,504.00
$(14,494.00)
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
No Change
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY}:
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
160
S-054
$8,010
$22,504
$(14,494)
35.59%
January 13, 2026
335
SERVICE
YOUTH SPORTS - BASKETBALL
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITlON
RECREATION RECSUPV
RECREATION SECRETARY
RECREATION
RECREATION
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
TYPE UNIT TIME
40.00 10.00
Contract Costs 0.00
Materials & Supplies 0.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 50.00
TOTALS 50.00
1t:n
REFERENCE NO.
S-054
TOTAL UNITS
1 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COSl
$8,792.00 1 $8,792
$1,71 1.60 1 $1 ,712
$8,000.00 1 $8,000
$4,000.00 1 $4,000
$22,503.60 $22,504
$22,504.00 $22,504
January 13, 2026
336
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025•2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
SNAP BASKETBALL
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY SERVICES
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
PARTICIPANT
Processing of applications to participate in SNAP basketball.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
SERVICE RECIPIENT
$22.50 per participant with schoalrship funding from donations
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
No Change
$0.00
$1,864.00
$(1,864.00)
1 162
TOT AL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S.055
$0
$1,864
$(1,864)
0.00%
January 13, 2026
337
SERVICE
SNAP BASKETBALL
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
RECREATION REC SUPV
RECREATION SECRETARY
RECREATION
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
~ UNIT TIME
6.01 1.00
Contract Costs 0.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 7.01
TOTALS 7.01
REFERENCE NO.
S-055
TOTAL UNITS
1 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COSl
$1,321.00 1 $1,321
$171.16 1 $171
$372.00 1 $372
$1,864.16 $1,864
$1,864.00 $1,864
January 13, 2026
338
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
AQUATICS PROGRAM
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY SERVICES
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
NIA
Processing of applications to participate in aquatic programs.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$25/lesson - private lessons
$2 - open swim
$45/two weeks - group lessons
YMCA Receives 30% of all revenues
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
$11,633.00
$92,078.00
$(80,445.00)
1 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
No Change
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
164
S-056
$11,633
$92,078
$(80,445)
12.63%
January 13. 2026
339
SERVICE
AQUATICS PROGRAM
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
RECREATION RECSUPV
RECREATION SECRETARY
RECREATION
RECREATION
RECREATION
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
neg UNIT TIME
80.00 60.00
YMCA Contract 0.00
Materials & Supplies 0.00
30% Of Fees 0.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 140.00
TOTALS 140.00
REFERENCE NO.
S-056
TOTAL UNITS
1 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS1
$17,584.00 1 $17,584
$10,269.60 1 $10,270
$55,150.00 1 $55,150
$4,088.30 1 $4,088
$4,985.63 1 $4,986
$92,077.53 $92,078
$92,078.00 $92,078
Januaiy 13, 2026
340
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
SUMMER CAMP
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY SERVICES
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
PARTICIPANT WK
SERVICE RECIPIENT
Processing the setup and operation of a city summer camp.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$50 per week - 5 days/week
Total Program Time: 4 weeks
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
$5,200.00
$50,614.00
$(45,414.00)
1 TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
No Change
166
S-057
$5,200
$50,614
$(45,414)
10.27%
January 28. 2026
341
SERVICE
SUMMER CAMP
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
RECREATION REC SUPV
RECREATION SECRETARY
RECREATION
RECREATION
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
TYPE UNIT TIME
129.92
12.02 Contract Costs 0.00
Materials & Supplies 0.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 141.94
TOTALS 141.94
10,
REFERENCE NO.
S-057
TOTAL UNITS
1 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$28,556.42 1 $28,556
$2,057.34 1 $2,057
$19,000.00 1 $19,000
$1,000.00 1 $1,000
$50,613.76 $50,614
$50,614.00 $50,614
January 28, 2026
342
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
CONTRACT CLASSES
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY SERVICES
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
PARTICIPANT
Processing class contracts, registrations, and schedules.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
70/30 split between city and contracted instructors
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
No Change
$2,700.00
$2,642.00
$58.00
1 168
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-058
$2,700
$2,642
$58
102.20%
January 13, 2026
343
SERVICE
CONTRACT CLASSES
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
RECREATION REC SUPV
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
TYPE UNIT TIME
12.02 TYPE SUBTOTAL 12.02
TOTALS 12.02
REFERENCE NO.
S-058
TOTAL UNITS
1 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$2,642.00 1 $2,642
$2,642.00 $2,642
$2,642.00 $2,642
January 13, 2026
344
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE ANO COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
FACILITY/FIELD/PARK RENTALS
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY SERVICES
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
RENTAL
SERVICE RECIPIENT
Processing requests for various City of Anderson facilities. parks, and rentals.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
Ampitheater - $500 Rental - $300 w/ electricity + lights $2,000 Ticket Event (open to public) - $750 Deposit
KC Grove #1 - $50 : KC Grove #2 -$50 : Cottonwood Grove - $75 Moose Grove - $50 : BBQ #1 - $75 : BBQ #2 - $50 Gazebo - $75 Riverview - $50
Field Rental - $100 Deposit - $75 Rental
All Anderson River Park Facillities Event Fee - $200
Scout Hall - $250 w/$350 Cleaning Deposit
Arts & Crafts Room - $30/3 hours w/$75 cleaning deposit Community Center - $300 w/$500 cleaning deposit
REVENUE ANO COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
$73,057.00
$123,850.00
$(50, 793.00)
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100°/o
See Appendix F of this report.
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
170
S-059
$73,057
$123,850
$(50,793)
58.99%
January 28. 2026
345
SERVICE
FACILITY/FIELD/PARK RENTALS
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
RECREATION REC SUPV
RECREATION SECRETARY
RECREATION REC SUPV
RECREATION SECRETARY
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
TYPE UNIT TIME
162.40
487.20
TYPE SUBTOTAL 649,60
Ball Field Rental 10.00
Ball Field Rental 15.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 25.00
TOTALS 674.60
171
REFERENCE NO.
S-059
TOTAL UNITS
1 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS1
$35,695.52 1 $35,696
$83,389.15 1 $83,389
$119,084.67 $119,085
$2,198.00 1 $2,198
$2,567.40 1 $2,567
$4,765.40 $4,765
$123,850.00 $123,850
January 13. 2026
346
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
SPLASH PAD
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY SERVICES
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
RENTAL
SERVICE RECIPIENT
Processing request for splash pad facility reservation, contract, and deposit.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
Entire Facility - $400 4hr blocks
Splash Pad Gazebo (4 tables and gazebo cover) - $100 3hr blocks UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOT AL UNITS:
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
$8,500.00
$32,156.00
$(23,656.00)
1 TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
No Change
172
S-060
$8,500
$32,156
$(23,656)
26.43%
January 13, 2026
347
SERVICE
SPLASH PAD
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
RECREATION REC SUPV
RECREATION SECRETARY
RECREATION
RECREATION
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
~ UNIT TIME
50.00 22.00
Contract Costs 0.00
Materials & Supplies 0.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 72.00
TOTALS 72.00
REFERENCE NO,
S-060
TOTAL UNITS
1 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$10,990.00 1 $10,990
$3,765.52 1 $3,766
$17,000.00 1 $17,000
$400.00 1 $400
$32,155.52 $32,156
$32,156.00 $32,156
January 13, 2026
348
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
ICE RINK
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY SERVICES
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
RENTAL
SERVICE RECIPIENT
Processing request for ice rink facility reservation, contract, and deposit.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
Private Rentals
$200 per hour
Additional rental hours $50 per hour
Fire PiUHeater rental $100 for event
Admission $5 per person
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
$3,270.00
$29,598.00
$(26,328.00)
1 TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
No change
174
S-061
$3,270
$29,598
$(26,328)
11.05%
January 13, 2026
349
SERVICE
ICE RINK
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
RECREATION RECSUPV
RECREATION SECRETARY
RECREATION
RECREATION
PARKS MAINTWKR
PWMAINT MAINTWKR
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
TYPE UNIT TIME
25.00 10.00
Materials & Supplies 0.00
Contract Costs 0.00
3 Days Of 3 72.00
3 Days Of 3 72.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 179.00
TOTALS 179,00
175
REFERENCE NO.
S-061
TOTAL UNITS
1 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$5,495.00 1 $5,495
$1,711.60 1 $1,712
$650.00 1 $650
$11,000.00 1 $11,000
$5,164.56 1 $5,165
$5,577.12 1 $5,577
$29,598.28 $29,598
$29,598.00 $29,598
January 13, 2026
350
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
MOSQUITO SERENADE VENDOR
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY SERVICES
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
VENDOR
SERVICE RECIPIENT
Processing and review of Mosquito Serenade vendor requests to sell foods.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
For-profit vendors - $150 per concert
For-profit vendor only selling beverages - $75 per concert Non-profit vendors - $50 per concert
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
For-profit vendors - $225 per concert
$5,450.00
$4,937.00
$513.00
1 For-profit vendor only selling beverages - $115 per concert Non-profit vendors - $75 per concert
176
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-062
$5,450
$4,937
$513
110.39%
January 13, 2026
351
SERVICE
MOSQUITO SERENADE VENDOR
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
RECREATION RECSUPV
RECREATION SECRETARY
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
IYf5 UNIT TIME
10.00 16.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 26.00
TOTALS 26.00
177
REFERENCE NO.
S-062
TOTAL UNITS
1 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COSl
$2,198.00 1 $2.198
$2,738.56 1 $2.739
$4,936.56 $4,937
$4,937.00 $4,937
January 13, 2026
352
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
COMMUNITY BENCH PROGRAM
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
MAINTENANCE
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
BENCH
Processing a bench sponsorship and placement request.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
None
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$2,400 per bench
$0.00
$2,400.00
$(2,400.00)
1 178
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-063
$0
$2,400
$(2,400)
0.00%
January 29, 2026
353
SERVICE
COMMUNITY BENCH PROGRAM
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
PARKS
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
~ UNIT TIME
Purchase/Install 0.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.00
TOTALS ().00
REFERENCE NO.
S-063
TOTAL UNITS
1 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTA' en~,
$2,400.00 1 $2.400
$2,400.00 $2,400
$2,400.00 $2,400
January 29, 2026
354
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
WATER METER INSTALLATION
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
UTILITIES
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Processing a meter installation request.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
5/8 or 3/4" - $110
2" -$190
1 1/2" - $455
2" -$596
Over 2" - Cost
UNIT OF SERVICE
METER
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$110.00
$910.60
$(800.60)
20 $910 per meter plus actual costs of parts and supplies.
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
180
S-064
$2,200
$18,212
$(16,012)
12.08%
January 13, 2026
355
SERVICE
WATER METER INSTALLATION
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
WATER SUPPLY & DIST WATER SYST OPER II
CUSTOMER SERVICE ACCT CLERK Ill
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
TYPE UNIT TIME
3hrs Of 2 6.00
1.00 TYPE SUBTOTAL 7.00
TOTALS 7.00
11:11
REFERENCE NO.
S-064
TOTAL UNITS
20 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COSl
$836.64 20 $16,733
$73.96 20 $1,479
$910.60 $18,212
$910.60 $18,212
January 13, 2026
356
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
TEMPORARY WATER METER RENTAL
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
UTILITIES
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
METER
Processing a temporary construction meter request.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
Install. Fee - $40
per meter
Rental -$50/mo
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$230 per meter
$50 rental per month
$40.00
$228.00
$(188.00)
182
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOT AL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-065
$40
$228
$(188)
17.54%
January 13, 2026
357
SERVICE
TEMPORARY WATER METER RENTAL
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
WATER SUPPLY & DIST WATER SYST OPER II
CUSTOMER SERVICE ACCT CLERK Ill
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
TYPE UNIT TIME
1.50 0.25
TYPE SUBTOTAL 1.75
TOTALS 1.75
REFERENCE NO.
S-065
TOTAL UNITS
1 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COSl
$209.16 1 $209
$18.49 1 $18
$227,65 $228
$228.00 $228
January 13, 2026
358
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
TEMPORARY WATER METER MOVE
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
UTILITIES
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
REQUEST
Processing a request to relocate a temporary hydrant.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
None
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$70 per request
$0.00
$70.00
$(70.00)
1 184
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOT AL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-066
$0
$70
$(70)
0.00%
January 13, 2026
359
SERVICE
TEMPORARY WATER METER MOVE
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
WATER SUPPLY & DIST WATER SYST OPER II
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
r!.f!E UNIT TIME
0.50 TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.50
TOTALS 0.50
185
REFERENCE NO.
S-066
TOTAL UNITS
1 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COSl
$69.72 1 $70
$69.72 $70
$70.00 $70
Januaiy 13, 2026
360
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO,
WATER SYSTEM EXTENSION INSP.
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
UTILITIES
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
INSPECTION
Inspection of extensions to the water system for standards.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$25 per inspection
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$925 per inspection
$25.00
$926.00
$(901.00)
186
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-067
$25
$926
$(901)
2.70%
January 13, 2026
361
SERVICE
WATER SYSTEM EXTENSION INSP.
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITlON
WATER SUPPLY & DIST PW SUPT
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
I!fE UNIT TIME
4.00 TYPE SUBTOTAL 4.00
TOTALS 4.00
REFERENCE NO,
S-067
TOTAL UNITS
1 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$925.92 1 $926
$925.92 $926
$926.00 $926
January 13. 2026
362
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
WATER METER TEST
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
UTILITIES
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
TEST
SERVICE RECIPIENT
Inspection of a meter to test for accuracy. Done at the request of a customer
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
5/8 or 3/4" - $50
1" - $1 00
1 1/2" - $150
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$850 per test
$50.00
$849.20
$(799.20)
10 Fee will be refunded if the water meter is running fast.
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
188
S-068
$500
$8,492
$(7,992)
5.89%
January 13. 2026
363
SERVICE
WATER METER TEST
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
WATER SUPPLY & DIST WATER SYST OPER II
CUSTOMER SERVICE ACCT CLERK Ill
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
~ UNIT TIME
6.00 0.17
TYPE SUBTOTAL 6.17
TOTALS 6.17
1tll1
REFERENCE NO.
S..068
TOTAL UNITS
10 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS1
$836.64 10 $8,366
$12.57 10 $126
$849.21 $8,492
$849.20 $8,492
January 13, 2026
364
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
WATER TURN ON AFTER NONPAYMENT
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
UTILITIES
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
TURN ON
SERVICE RECIPIENT
Processing a request to restore water service after delinquent turn off.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$25 per turn on
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$90 per turn on
$25.00
$90.96
$(65.96)
450
190
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-069
$11,250
$40,934
$(29,684)
27.48%
January 13, 2026
365
SERVICE
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
WATER TURN ON AFTER NONPAYMENT
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION n:fE UNIT TIME
WATER SUPPLY & DIST WATER SYST OPER II 0.53
CUSTOMER SERVICE ACCT CLERK Ill 1 Hr/Once A Month 0.03
TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.56
CUSTOMER SERVICE ACCT CLERK Ill Per Turn On 0.08
TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.08
FINANCE ACCT CLERK Ill Late Water Payment 0.01
TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.01
FINANCE ACCT CLERK Ill Red Tag Delivery 0.02
TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.02
TOTALS 0.67
REFERENCE NO.
S-069
TOTAL UNITS
450
UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$74.28 450 $33,426
$1 .92 450 $864
$76.20 $34,290
$5.92 450 $2,664
$5.92 $2,664
$0.50 4,000 $2,000
$0.50 $2,000
$0.99 2,000 $1,980
$0.99 $1,980
$90.96 $40,934
January 13, 2026
366
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
NON-EMERGENCY AFTER HOURS ON/OFF
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
UTILITIES
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
TURN OFF/ON
SERVICE RECIPIENT
Processing an after-hours non-emergency turn on/off at customer's request.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
None
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$420 per turn on/off
$0.00
$418.33
$(418.33)
12 192
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-070
$0
$5,020
$(5,020)
0.00%
January 13, 2026
367
SERVICE
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
NON-EMERGENCY AFTER HOURS ON/OFF
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME
WATER SUPPLY & DIST WATER SYST OPER II OfOT 3.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 3.00
TOTALS 3.00
REFERENCE NO.
S..070
TOTAL UNITS
12 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COSl
$418.32 12 $5,020
$418.32 $5,020
$418.33 $5,020
January 13, 2026
368
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
WATER METER TAMPERING
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
UTILITIES
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
INSPECTION
Reviewing suspected tampering of water meter.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$50 per review
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
1st incident - $500
2nd incident - $1 ,000
3rd incident - $2,000
Within 60 days
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
6 194
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-071
$0
$0
$0
0.00%
January 13, 2026
369
SERVICE
WATER METER TAMPERING
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
r!f§ UNIT TIME
0.00 TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.00
TOTALS o.oo
REFERENCE NO.
S-071
TOTAL UNITS
6 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$0.00 0 $0
$0.00 $0
$0.00 $0
January 13, 2026
370
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
WATER BACKFLOW INSPECTION
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
UTILITIES
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Reviewing backflow device compliance.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$35 device per year
UNIT OF SERVICE
DEVICE
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$330 device per year
$35.00
$332.27
$(297.27)
400
196
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-072
$14,000
$132,908
$(118,908)
10.53%
January 13, 2026
371
SERVICE
WATER BACKFLOW INSPECTION
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
WATER SUPPLY & DIST CROSS CONN CNTR SPEC
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
r!fs UNIT TIME
60% 2.44
TYPE SUBTOTAL 2.44
TOTALS 2.44
REFERENCE NO.
S-072
TOTAL UNITS
400
UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS1
$332.27 400 $132,908
$332.27 $132,908
$332.27 $132,908
January 13. 2026
372
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
GREASE TRAP INSPECTION
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
UTILITIES
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
INSPECTION
Inspection of grease trap compliance at facilities.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
None
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$105 per inspection
$0.00
$106.24
$(106.24)
50 198
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-073
$0
$5,312
$(5,312)
0.00%
January 13, 2026
373
SERVICE
GREASE TRAP INSPECTION
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
WI/VTP CHIEF WVVTP OPER
WI/VTP VWVTPSUPV
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
TYPE UNIT TIME
1 Hr/Month 0.24
2 Hrs/Month 0.48
TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.72
TOTALS 0.72
REFERENCE NO.
S-073
TOTAL UNITS
50 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS1
$43.97 50 $2,199
$62.27 50 $3,114
$106.24 $5,312
$106.24 $5,312
January 13, 2026
374
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
GREASE TRAP INSPECTION FOLLOW-UP
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
UTILITIES
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Reviewing corrective actions after inspection.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$25 per inspection
UNIT OF SERVICE
INSPECTION
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$120 per inspection
$25.00
$121.00
$(96.00)
200
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-074
$25
$121
$(96)
20.66%
January 13, 2026
375
SERVICE
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
GREASE TRAP INSPECTION FOLLOW-UP
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNITTIME
WASTE-WATER COLLE( CLCTN SYST LEAD OPER 1.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 1.00
TOTALS uo
REFERENCE NO.
S-074
TOTAL UNITS
1 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS1
$120.61 1 $121
$120.61 $121
$121.00 $121
January 13, 2026
376
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE ANO COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
NEW INDUSTRIAL WASTE USER PERMIT
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
UTILITIES
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Processing an industrial waste user permit.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
None
UNIT OF SERVICE
PERMIT
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE ANO COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$550 per permit
$0.00
$549.00
$(549.00)
202
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-075
$0
$549
$(549)
0.00%
January 13, 2026
377
SERVICE
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
NEW INDUSTRIAL WASTE USER PERMIT
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION D'.fs UNIT TIME
WNTP CHIEF W'NTP OPER 3.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 3.00
TOTALS 3.00
REFERENCE NO.
S-075
TOTAL UNITS
1 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$548.70 1 $549
$548.70 $549
$549.00 $5'9
January 13, 2026
378
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT RENEWAL
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
UTILITIES
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
PERMIT
Processing an industrial waste permit renewal.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
None
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100¾
$275 per permit
$0.00
$274.00
$(274.00)
1 204
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-076
$0
$274
$(274)
0.00%
January 13, 2026
379
SERVICE
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT RENEWAL
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME
WWTP CHIEF WWTP OPER 1.50
TYPE SUBTOTAL 1.50
TOTALS 1.50
:lUS
REFERENCE NO.
S-076
TOTAL UNITS
1 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$274.35 1 $274
$274.35 $274
$274.00 $274
January 13, 2026
380
SERVICE
ILLEGAL DISCHARGE
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
UTILITIES
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
REFERENCE NO.
UNIT OF SERVICE
INCIDENT
SERVICE RECIPIENT
Clean up of illegal discharge in the public right-of~way due to the actions of a private party.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
Actual Costs
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1 TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
Charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside contract costs. $2,000 minimum
S-077
$0
$0
$0
0.00%
January 13, 2026
206
381
SERVICE
ILLEGAL DISCHARGE
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
:r!fE UNIT TIME
0.00 TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.00
TOTALS 0.00
-.t.U/
REFERENCE NO.
S-077
TOTAL UNITS
1 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COSl
$0.00 0 $0
$0.00 $0
$0.00 $0
January 13, 2026
382
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
BANNER POLE INSTALLATION
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
PARKS
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
BANNER
SERVICE RECIPIENT
Installation and secure placement of city-approved banner poles within the public right-of-way.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$150 per banner
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$195 per banner
$150.00
$196.20
$(46.20)
5 208
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-078
$750
$981
$(231)
76.45%
January 14. 2026
383
SERVICE
BANNER POLE INSTALLATION
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
BLDG DIVISION BLDG INSP/PRMT TECH
PARKS MAINTWKR
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
TYPE UNIT TIME
0.50 2.00
TYPE SUBTOTAL 2.50
TOTALS 2.50
REFERENCE NO.
S-078
TOTAL UNITS
5 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$52.68 5 $263
$143.46 5 $717
$196.14 $981
$196.20 $981
January 13, 2026
384
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
BUSINESS LICENSE PROCESSING
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
FINANCE
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Processing a business license application.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
None
UNIT OF SERVICE
LICENSE
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$55 per license review
$0.00
$55.47
$(55.47)
180
210
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-079
$0
$9,985
$(9,985)
0.00%
January 13, 2026
385
SERVICE
BUSINESS LICENSE PROCESSING
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
CUSTOMER SERVICE ACCT CLERK Ill
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
r!fg UNIT TIME
0.75 TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.75
TOTALS 0.75
211
REFERENCE NO.
S-079
TOTAL UNITS
180
UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL C0S1
$55.47 180 $9,985
$55.47 $9,985
$55.47 $9,985
January 13, 2026
386
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
BUSINESS LICENSE RENEWAL
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
FINANCE
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
PERMIT
Processing an annual business license renewal.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
None
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$8 per permit renewal
$0.00
$8.11
$(8.11)
1,457
212
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-080
$0
$11,816
$(11,816)
0.00%
January 13, 2026
387
SERVICE
BUSINESS LICENSE RENEWAL
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
CUSTOMER SERVICE ACCT CLERK Ill
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
TYPE UNIT TIME
20hrs Week/2 Months 0.11
TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.11
TOTALS 0.11
213
REFERENCE NO.
S-080
TOTAL UNITS
1,457
UNIT COST ANN. UNlTS TOTAL COS1
$8.11 1,457 $11 ,816
$8.11 $11,816
$8.11 $11,816
January 13, 2026
388
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
NSF CHECK PROCESSING
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
FINANCE
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
NSF CHECK
Processing a returned check and account update.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
$25 per NSF check
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$30 per NSF check
$25.00
$27.56
$(2.56)
27 214
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-081
$675
$744
$(69)
90.73%
January 13, 2026
389
SERVICE
NSF CHECK PROCESSING
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
FINANCE ACCT CLERK Ill
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
TYPE UNIT TIME
0.50 TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.50
TOTALS 0.50
215
REFERENCE NO.
S-081
TOTAL UNITS
27 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COS1
$27.54 27 $744
$27.54 $744
$27.56 $744
January 13, 2026
390
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
DOCUMENT REPRODUCTION
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
CITY CLERK
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
COPIES
Processing a request to reproduce documents for user.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
First 10 pages free and $0.10 each page thereafter
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
First 1 0 pages - free
Each page thereafter - $.20
(Limited by Public Records Act)
$0.00
$1.00
$(1.00)
1 216
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-082
$0
$1
$(1)
0.00%
JanualY' 13, 2026
391
SERVICE
DOCUMENT REPRODUCTION
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
CITY MANAGER CITY CLERK
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
TYPE UNIT TIME
0.01 TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.01
TOTALS 0.01
217
REFERENCE NO.
S-082
TOTAL UNITS
1 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$1.12 1 $1
$1.12 $1
$1.00 $1
January 13, 2026
392
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
ELECTRONIC FILE REPRODUCTION
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
CITY CLERK
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
APPLICATION
Processing a request to reproduce electronic files.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
None
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$5 per device
(Limited by Public Records Act)
$0.00
$1.00
$(1.00)
1 218
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-083
$0
$1
$(1)
0.00%
January 13, 2026
393
SERVICE
ELECTRONIC FILE REPRODUCTION
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
CITY MANAGER CITY CLERK
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
TYPE UNIT TIME
0.01 TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.01
TOTALS 0.01
REFERENCE NO.
S-083
TOTAL UNITS
1 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COSl
$1.12 1 $1
$1.12 $1
$MO $1
January 13, 2026
394
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
NOTARY PUBLIC
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
CITY CLERK
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Processing a notarization request and record.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
None
UNIT OF SERVICE
APPLICATION
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$15 per signature
Fee is set by State Law
$0.00
$9.00
$(9.00)
1 220
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S.084
$0
$9
$(9)
0.00%
January 13, 2026
395
SERVICE
NOTARY PUBLIC
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
CITY MANAGER CITY CLERK
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
TYPE UNIT TIME
0.08 TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.08
TOTALS 1).08
REFERENCE NO.
S-084
TOTAL UNITS
1 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$8.96 1 $9
$8.96 $9
$9.00 $9
January 13, 2026
396
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
MAJOR SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
CITY CLERK
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
UNIT OF SERVICE
PERMIT
Processing a permit for a major citywide event.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
None
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$270 per permit
$0.00
$270.00
$(270.00)
5 222
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-085
$0
$1,350
$(1,350)
0.00%
January 13, 2026
397
SERVICE
MAJOR SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
CITY MANAGER CITY CLERK
CITY MANAGER CITY MGR
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
n:f5 UNIT TIME
2.00 0.17
TYPE SUBTOTAL 2.17
TOTALS 2.17
REFERENCE NO.
S-085
TOTAL UNITS
5 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$223.88 5 $1,119
$46.03 5 $230
$269.91 $1,350
$270.00 $1,350
January 13, 2026
398
CITY OF ANDERSON
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
MINOR SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT
PRIMARY DEPARTMENT
CITY CLERK
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Processing a permit for a small special event.
CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE
None
UNIT OF SERVICE
PERMIT
SERVICE RECIPIENT
REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON
UNIT REVENUE:
UNIT COST:
UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
TOTAL UNITS:
SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: 100%
$55 per permit
$0.00
$56.00
$(56.00)
1 224
TOTAL REVENUE:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY):
PCT. COST RECOVERY:
S-086
$0
$56
$(56)
0.00%
January 13, 2026
399
SERVICE
MINOR SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT
NOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEPARTMENT POSITION
CITY MANAGER CITY CLERK
CITY OF ANDERSON
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
FY 2025-2026
~ UNIT TIME
0.50 TYPE SUBTOTAL 0.50
TOTALS G.50
as
REFERENCE NO.
S-086
TOTAL UNITS
1 UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
$55.97 1 $56
$55.97 $56
$56.00 $56
January 13, 2026
400
THIS PAGE
INTENTIONALLY BLANK
226
401
APPENDIX C - DETAIL OF BUILDING & SAFE1Y FEES
227
402
City of Anderson
- I A. IYUdtnc e«rmlt fm
Iottt VilutUon
SS00-1nd Undtr SB.SO
$501 to s2,ooo
$23.50 tot me t~n.r SSOO ol
valuation, plus $3.0S tor
S'.IO e.Khadd,1ional$U)Oof 1000 0-1 m.u $Si .. ¥•uation.or lr1eOon the1eol. toolt1dir,chtdl.-CS2.000ol
va(uatlon
$2,001 to $2S,OOO
$90 for th• first $2,000
of valuation, plus Sl8 $69.50 lo, theCirst S2.000o1
tor each addi1ionaC
valuauon, plusSt4.00for
exhadd1t10NlS1.000of ~~ 1,4/ld Q-~ ~"" ~ "' S 1,000 of valuatiOfl, or valuation, or lracuon thfreo!_ fraction th~reof, to 1fld to~inctud,r,gS2S.OOOot
including $25,000 of val1,1ation
valuation.
SlS,DD1 to SS0,000
$S04 for the first
$25,000 of vaklation, S39l
,7Slor\he !irst $25,000
P'us S 12 for tach
olvaluatlon. ptus $1O.l01or
ackiltionat Sl.000 of eKh<1dd1tional.Sl.OOOot H -~ Sl~tt ~IIC'IS. valuat Of"I, or fraction valuation, or lraclloo lhefeal, thereof, to and t0~includ
1"1$50,000ot
nc ud n1 SS0,000 of val1,1at1on
valu,1tior,_
SS0.001 to SUD,000
$804 for the first
SSO,OOOof valuation, S643.1s 1or the lir$1 sso_ooo
plus S6 fo, U<h ofvaluallon, pl.u$
17.00 ror
addftional S 1,000 of each addit
ional.11,000 01
~•-M " S11t~ ..,.,.,, valuauon. or fraction valuaoon, or lraclion lhe,eot, th@,eof, to aitd to and
lncludin& 1100.000 ot
·11clud1n1 $100,000 of YilUitiOA
yaluatiort.
403
City of Anderson
------------- --
$- • 'J, ·~· .
$100,001 ta $500,000
$1,104 for th~ first
S 100,000 or valuatloA, $993. 75 ta, Ille
tifSt
~lvs $6"65 for uc~ $100.COO ofvalu&tiOn, plus
idditional $1,000 of SS.~fo, each add!Uonal
u WIO.M
,n..10 l-l .... 101111 Sl,000 ol'tiluition.or valuat1on, or frattion ltiKltOnlheteof. to and ther.of~ to 1:nd ln,;:h,4in&$500,000 of inc.ludinc SS00,000 of valuation valuation.
Ssoo,001 ta Sl,000,000
$3,7S4 for the first
$S00,000 of valua1io!\1
$3.233.75 fot en, e1,st
plus $6. 70 for Heh S500.000 o1 valuation. plus
additional Sl,-OOOof $.4
.75toreacn IClcllt;onat
U .. Hl!l«I SSM.'5 ......... S 1.000 <11 vatuauon.
or valuation, or rra.etion 1racli0n 1hneal. io and thtreof. to and •nclvdi-a S-1.000.000 01 iACludin1 Sl,000,000 of valu.atlM \faiuation.
SJ,000,000 ~nd DVl!'r
$7,114 for the first S5.608.75
tottM-tilSI
r 1,000,000 of valuation ~
s1.ooo.cooo1 v&Wation, plus
Mi,olTIIO :!:riJl 10
'"'.!Ol.m plus $3
.35 for Heh $3.65 tor f:athadditlOn.al
additiot1a $1,000 of Sl000,va1u.ati0n,Of1r~uon
valtJation. or rtac.tion thl:reol. to and ;nc1udinJ
thereof. s1
.oooorvawa1cott
I A. lb!l!s!lmifll!li;Mskfm Tora• \l.aluUion
SSOO -1~ UN.le,
1tt or 8u1ldin1 Permit
F•e:
6511 Sfngft Family; 7S" 6$,t,
Ol 8ulkhnt Ptrmil Fet
Commerciat/Mulci
Fam•:v
liOI ooS~NO "'- of Building Perm
it
Fet·
u J.M.
•] 6S1' Single Fam1,v,; 751' 654Mi or &u11e1rncPtrm11 Fee Commerclat/Multi
Fam1'y
,,.
404
City of Anderson
$2,001 lo $25,000
"of Building Ptrmit
FH:
»»'4 >ISH6 651' Singl• F•mily; 751' as..ol 8uild1ntPtrmitfee Commtrcial/Mu\ti
FaR'lily
SlS,00110 SS0.000
9'of 8uirdin1, Pumit
Ftt:
,,, .... $!!0 ... 651' Single hmily; 751' ~oill8ulldlfl.lPermitFtt Commercial/Multi
F1mily
Sso,001 to S100.ooo
"of Building Permit
Fee:
~,.,,n S>t1.., 6S" Sin1te family; 7S,C. ~olBulldJftlPeffflilFfof Commercial/Multi
Famny
Sl00.001 to SS00.000
'4of 8urld1n1 Permit
FH
•.s >195 .. $PB.r•, 651' Sincle F•mily; 751' 6.S .. of Bulkln,~m,t Feie Comm ere al/Multi
Famity
ssoo.00110 si.000.000
'4of Buildinc Permit
FH·
$U19M 1,1...,,.,. 65" Sin1~ Family; 75" 65" of Buildlllj Pt 1m,1 Ftt
Commercial/Multi
F1mity
$1,000,000 •nd OW!r
,C.of Buildin, Permit
Fee:
'"-!Oil 1,,i,.1""191' 65" Single Family; 75% 65" ot 8uildift1Pe rmit Fff
Commercial/Multi
Famit._-
405
City of Anderson
--- ---
l<.141on._, Ir~•
2 OtDtr IPIPCUIPO l!)lf fut
Inspections out~e normal buslnes1 hours or
er~ited lnspec.tlon1
Reinspec.lion feH
lnspec:UotrS for wNc.l\ l'IO ftt '5 ~tficalty
indk:.ated
AdchUONI pf,n rt"Mw (haflH ttQuiftd tly
ch.nan, •dcHUom, or ,nn10ns to pl,1ns
,or uw of o!ASlde consult.ant, for plan Ul.ct.111
and i,nspe,c:tioffl, Df both
0.molil.ion hrmlt • ltuidffltlal
O.molnion Ptormlt • Commti'clal -- up ti> '5,000
sq.ft.
Oe-molnlon Permiot • Comme.-clal ow, S,000
SQ.ft.
Comm«cial tlwi,Jtoof, ~tf 10,000 SQ ft
3 fltdd£fl hfmlt Frca
fort~ lu~nct of e.ch ete<ukal Ptfffllt
for 1h• iHuann of eHh S1Jppie,m•n1al P"tmlt
for whk.h lht: orfcinat ~/mil Nlti nQI .-.wplrfd.
bffn c.anc•~. or finaJlfd
• tnttm Fee ktdvlc
Sil. ..
Ac.1wlCm1 .t.c1ualetn1
...
.., ...
.....
SJ62 ;>tr hOur, minimum $65.00 per hOur, minimum
ottwohou•s ol tw0t10urs
S162pet hour,mtnimum $65.ClOpet"hOur.mlnimum
°"'"°"'
$t$2c,er hour,,n1ft1mum $85.00 pef OOUr. minimum
f)f 0ne-hau hour of ooe-haU hoor
$t620f(l'IOU1.ff\ll"llmum S65.001)tf'h0Ut.fflffllmum
ot one-haU hol.lr ot OM·hil.f hour
h.1,.lcons.ultantcosts. plus .actuilconsultat1tcosts.plus 10" .admlnl~r,1t1on and 1CN admlnlstralton and
averhl!!ld COilS
$595
$1,000 de1>0slt with
charges at the iul y
Allouted Hourly Rates
or all start Involv1td pl115
actual con5,ultant cons
$1,000 deposit with
cha<ces at the Ful y
Allocated Hourly Rates
or ill stiff Involved phJ
iCtual consultant costs
$53
$53
REMOVE THIS FEE
ovttheadc-osts
121 ..
406
City of AndersCMI
~ ..... ~
~• .i ~ [ ~.-- t •In. , r '-'= [ ·, , ( ·,u
lle-w buildit'IS: Tht lo~ let1, WU W'dudit
an www.a af'ld •IKlrkll tqulpml'nt In
0, on H(h bultdt:na, Ot otht, tltcttk'1
tQulpmtnt on tN Mmt p,em!Ms c°"'IRKttd
Hthe-wm1-
time:
llew Commerdal, lndustt~ BuHdir,ss;
~ multif-1mlly bulldlnc1o 1,p,rtmtnls and $1.016 per permit or condamlnlurml hlvlrc \hrff or mort dwtllin1 d•posit detttmiend bv units (Gn1,lNCl«I illl lbt w ... limt". not art w;1h d1orgtsat th lnc.ludins thit area of 1ara1H, carpo,t1, and $'»•• -" 11)00 H.Ollli:tS fully allog1ed hourly S0.059tr square 1001 ac:ce·nory ratts fo, Ill per1onnel buildin&s. per squ.,r,t fool invovted phJs actual consultant eos,ts.
F,ar nl!w 5'nllt and two-family r~idefttial
buildin(.S c.onslruclf'd ll tM U!M tirnt, not lhi5 fet is included in S0,056 pe, squ.are foo1 lncl~in& the ,,e-1 of liloillf1. carpom. I nd the valuation, tables. accusorv b,i,ilidirliP, per sa~Je-loot COMBO PEA:MIT ror ttEW PAIV,\TE. lt"-trourid
swtm.nln1 pools far SW'Clt-fal'l"llty and
muhif'amiy o«up,anc:les, lnduelin& ,1 COtnl)ltle
sv,,tem ofneuswry br,nch c:•r<ult wirirg. This fee is induded ir, bondi,._ 11our1C1irc, undetwall!'r •lshlfng. water ~.,,.u ~Jtj .. iON -·~ th• villuuions tabfes. $,t!.0- pumPrc and ott..r Mmibr ~trkial ~ulpm•nt dirtctlyH1.11ttdto the o.,...atiOn or a swlnvnine
pool, eKh pool
COMBO PERMIT· ro, ~£W PUBLIC.. .l'lo-&fOUl'ld
swi,mm,ln1 pools, ·t'IC•ud•te a (:Or'llpltlt SyUfm
of oe<essa,v bfMC.h cwc-...i wlftnC, boN:llrg.
1r0Yndlf'II, undtf'water liight""I,. wat"' purnptna ~lSl .. ~" $0.00 _ _ ., This fee is indudtd in .... ,. and 0th« similar dectric:al equipmenl dircrcttv the valuations tab1es. related 1c, lhe Ope-riallDn of a ,wimfflirc
pool.f'Khpoc,I
COMllO PERMIT· PRIVAIE SPAlAIOVE
GROUND. This fte ii inctuded in o.s ~iji - -· ~ U4 the valualiOns tables.
COM90 PERMIT· PU6UC SPA
~jS].M; !Al<!.1' $1100 -.. This fee is Included in
the valuations tables. $Q [,(>
s c,,nt,,k ind Qm11n
!;l:rntali: ,1,!.li!m SHSl:11:!!:rlclbdl!llJ:~Sl:r
1xbilm!l!J1 !.SH!dm Hi!!Hmllil!2!! lllf ci!m
booths ilkWn Ind tttftU!9rw
For ~l«vjcal 1tntra1on ind elt<.tticaly drivtf'I St6U2 $0.00 uii,~ $162 sn.jQ rtdls,each ,.,
407
City of Anderson
~ Pl,.n (htd, 1-i<X,r\ Pl• ri (h('tl- (O\t
For mt<NNCaly cMvtn rides arid w,_k-tt,,o.ch
lltrKtions or ~I.IVS h.11wtri1 e-lectrk liithU.,._ ~w ,,,,Ill) ~IHIIOI StU ,,.11
tKh
For a systtm of aru and booth "&,hti..._ each i.w~ 1/)QO IIH.12 $1H sn• • Irmm,a Powfl' k'Ykt
For I ltmpot,Hy wnrict c,olt- or pec!Nlll,
lrdudl.._ ,1190ft or pedn1,r-moun1~
j Ull-t.l
f l-'tn ,01)) ~,,, S)19 111158 rtc~~lt ouOtts .ate! appurttl'lll"IUS. tKta for a ltMl)C)ta,y disttibuUon ~letn and
tempOrary,ilf!Un& and receptacle oulltls for
comtructlan Nin, decorathoe liahts, thflstmu
~l:>UJ $l41W woo ~ ... $Pt $12,:,t
UN tot sa"s, n,~rb ti.ands, etc .. each
7 ftmltl;lt imlm IM lllbS ~II
Fgr CfStQ!.iik milit! lilbl 2t 2u~, 2ws1,u ii
~Is;~ ,!1!IU:"! 11 Ii!!§ 2l S2!nr~ fi,tm
Krds:U fttskn .and fflfltC1
flint ltf\fixtutti
F,rst 10 fixtures $85 0 . .2S - ll Ol'! ~ 411 ~00 - Sl.10.,er hlture per permit AddltlONII 10 fnt~rts Nut 10 fi,-;rures • $42 o.m jUJJ3 0.125 $lo.?• ,,,,.00 $<bl ermit $0.73per r1uure ""'
• l!chllttrfhltura
fQtll&t!SEl'i!Sm1 iQd!UtlE!:1Sb1rt.a1I11it
bOfdiM d:tvk1s··
Finl t•n fixturH F,rst 10 filtture, $85 0 2S S-4.21 025 $40.411 S0.00 ..... $1 .l0perf!tlure per permit
AddltloNI 10 ftJ1tur•s 0.12S Sllll) 0.12S $ZQ24 so
.00 .. ,,. Nht 10 fixtures $42
per permit S073pe,fixture
For~ or p&,tform.-mounttd H1htlrc fo1:h.ire1o. 0.25 $44.21 O.lS $40AI 5000 ..... F'ofll 10 fixture$ · S85 Fi«t St.t0perfP.t ure 1•n lb:u1r•s per permit
AddilioNI 10 fixt-,rH Next 10 fMurH $42 0125 52210 0125 s2O2• S0.00 .. ,,. St .tope, ruture per permit
For thtalriUl•type l'&htinl fo:turts or 0.2s $44
.21 025 $40.48 S0.00 ..... Frrst 10 fi11:tures
- Sas St.l0pe
r tuture auemblin, Finl ten liirtures per permit
Adcl~tlonal 10 rutur•s N1.1t 10 fix1Uf'es
- $42 o.m 522.10 0.125 Sl0.2-1 50.00 .. ,,. $1.t0perfi.ktu i e r ermit
9 Rrsidrntl!I APP!lansn
For rtJll!d r.sid~U.I appliances CM' r«•pt.c:les
for u~. lncludil'I wall-mounted ei«trlc
ovem; countitr•mot.intffl cooking tcp1,; ei.ctrlc
nna.s; seff-<.ont.al~d room, conso~ Qf
throuc~wal air condi1tOnen; sc,,c.e heaten; ~EMOVE THIS FEE ~5 food wMte Jrinden; dtt.trwa,t-.ert; w.aihin1 muhinn; wat.,- htaten; clolhH d~s: or
othtr motor-cpe,a1ed appllincfi no1
excttdii,\t. 011, horstpowef {7'61 ltl ratM'I&. ea<h
408
City of Anderson
~ i".111• 1 ,. i,.., , I•, 1 • •• I ,,
10 Nonrrsldfntlal Aee!b!!m ~, nonre-scltnta,11pe,1iifl«111\d seir- ,ontilntd r,ctoty-wlfed. f'IOt'ttSldff.ti.11
.appll.aK,e1. no1 t•cttdinc ont horwpo'lftr,
Uawan .. or tJ!ov<llbtmptrt In r,1ti"C, lndudil'II
mediul .and der1taldf"llcn, food, btwfag«-.and ·~ $11)!00 !:o.eo ill wn ke- erHm cabtN:ts; •umlnattd show c,se-t.:
drinlil"ltfouritalM: vel'ldll"II machinet; laundry
""cNl'!itt.; or 01Nt simibir tY1)IH of equlpffll'nl.
. .,.
LI eow,, Appac,tyl
fSI[ m:il!il:!I lf:!lS:[IJ2U l[i[!llRf:fm:11
HSliOm WJ5b[Sl!l5H4 ,2amtt:ll !!libil1Ldil 0~ S-0.- !:ooo Sil w,it!:I 1i, ~mlblsu2:ci 1~ ts11 mimm: ..... ,mi~lm; !U 111!:il!I alMilil!JJS:Dl 1ml SU~! IPPICfJYi fl(h
Up to .and incl~ins ont, ":h $4.7S
O,...,t Of'lt al"ld t10t ovtr ten, tach S12.»
Owr t«i .and Ml OW< firty, e_,ch l,2-l60
OwroM hunclr~ Heh JAO !I> 12 lmfm SR!,) lor uolll!'y .and "'-.W-in l~ bl.Kw.a'f', t.a,h Ont s,,,t.1 i<IOO 111!111.'12' Sl6Z s•.2~ hundrl!d ftel ar fraction 1he,e,of 13 i1m1Qldl!M L!l~Hl!llmt !dl~mi
,or sl&ns. outllrw fi1ht.in1 SV1tem1 or rNrquffi.
S&lppCied from OM bunc.h cirtr.;f. tltll
o.s 5'&U? 0.5 ,.,.. ,O(lt :l
tl»JI St69 ~u,,
for .additk»Aal br.Jnch (lr(Uits ll'fi\hldi <ht saMe
siln, outline lilhtingo, marql;ff, e l!Ch REMOVE THIS FEE 1'1?S 14 &otm 1b .Ym1112tt Ia unn1r1Si. smg
n~aI l~a.UCt!Wi l?MU Ctsamil:mill i8t:m
~m:~m,~mt&iHH:11
For SfrVlcH of 600 voth or ~1 and not O\ler OS $8842
0.5 $80.96 S0.00 S189.31 $169 $30
.50 lOOampern lnratin1, HCh
For SfrVicH af 6Q) YOb ar JeH and aver 200
amptrH to 1.000 amc,Htt In n1tin1, H<h $176.8.3 $161.92 S0.00 SJ3&.n S339 $42.15 For sef'Vic.tsOVfl 600wlu orave< 1.000 $116.H
$ 161.91 an,,perts ill ratiri1, Heh S0
.00 SJJ8
,7!, $339 $12-1.30
PlncJ Cblncc:9YS For SftVic.H af 600 v-alts ar 161 and not ovtr o.s $3&42 °' S,0.96 u $S2 "8 Ul:211!1 S2ZZ $3050 200ampertt In ral.inS, H<h for SffW.naf 60lYOksar le11, andovt-r 200
tmperH ,a 1.000 ampe,~ irl ratirlg. ..ach
$176.83 $.16L9l u $Sl."8 $391.43 Sl91 '6115
for kn'lceS.Oftr 600wolt1 or ave, l,IXC $176.
8) $.16192 u SS2"8 '39UJ $391 $124
.30 ,mperl''l in 1atU"11,, Hc:h
...
409
City of Anderson
15 Mlm:f!Ml!i!!:!161:R!!IM ~!!Sh!lb i!M
-ro, el«trtc.al 1pp,a11tus. conduits and
conductors fo, wtiich • ~rmit h ,~Ired but o.s $IO.t6 ~ -- $81 :l,l, .. :z,& fo, which no fee Is Mr•in ~ for
Sobr fwmoval I. hlMUilatlon o.s
_ .. $0.a> :ua.• $11 fq,00
AltttMliw Po\Wr Sourc• l~ratorr
Batttfiu,EtcJ
S1l't,~ '-141 »
- -~ S339 boo
Ntw Solair: Sina,t hmity ~n~I l ~ S26S.2S $16192 .. , $52.68 '$,1'9.&4 $450 $0.00 N~Solar: Muttt-FamityRe-sicfffltial Soa.r L5 $26S 2S $161.92 ... $'2.68 $479.&c $450 $0.00 Pl!fffllt 7-lSKw NewSobr: Muhi-Famityflfflatlt~I So1ar sm.66 sm.84 SU68 $450 plus $15 per kW Ptnnlt 161Cw ,and l,tJ .. , $730 18 •bovo15kW $0.00
NewSol,r; Commttdal 1·501Cw SS3049 $411S.76 e., $Sl.68 tt,068,93 $1,000 $0.00 ~Solar: CorNnerd1I 51-2S01(w s $88415 • $80'-60 $105.35 St,799,1D $ 7 per kW •bov• SOIIW $0.00 NewSoS,r; Convne,clal 2511Cw and up 7 Sl.237 81 Sl.lll44 SIOS.35 $2,4"8.60 S5 pe, kW over 250kW $0.00 Mis<tlllMOUS Solar Ptf"mh. SIIIS.76 sooo _.,. $450 $0.00 16 V•hki. Chlr1irt: Station• Sinai• famitv
R~ntiat SIX.ll o.s $10.96 so.oo $.2~7.7'$1 $258 $0.00
.. V•hki. <hriJif't St.ation • Multi•Famity
Re'6dtntial/Coft'lfflffciiil $ID.66 sm.84 e~ 552.68 j 1'_»11 5730 $0.00 0:Sbl:t IDll:U.1121:J IBlt Eal
lnspe,ctlom ouulde normal but.inns hours or $16:lPft"houf.minimum $65,00 pe, hour. minimum erpedited insp«.lions Off'M)hOuts olCWOhOurs Reintpe<lion feet. S162perl11s1>«11on, $65,00 per jnspecll<Jn, Minimum one hour Minimum one hour
lnspecli!Qm. for wNch rio fee h spe<if"-lly $1~ per hOu<. minimum S65 OOper hOU<.min1mum indC:•ted orone:h.ll.lhOLlr ot one half hour 17 Additlorwl si•n rnie-w ch•rps requited bv
tNrtCH, add.tiOns. or reWSIOns 10 pllf'I. for S16l pet nou,. mInImum S6S.OOptrf'tW. l"""intmum which initial ,eMW hu been completed orone~r,oo, oton• hatrftWf Mtct!tnkfl Prrmft Fees
Pttmit Issuant•
for the I Hua nu or Heh mec:hanic•I p«md: o.s ,SU,t ""'"' S53 Ul.riO 18 for Ole I Hua nee- or e-ach sull)plemental permtl
for whieh the- ortgiNI perm" has not upil"fll, REMOVE THIS FEE ,, ... bftn uncided. or fiNglfd • sysrm, fu Sd•dule
'"
410
City of Andf!rson
-- New Wldlncs- Tht ,o1ow1rc tee,, shll WI(~
•II ~ls •nd me<.holNul tql,lll~n1 in o, on
Heh bul\dirc, or Olh« fl'IC'(hainkal e,qui~nl
on the same~ c:onmocted .at the same
time:
Nirw Canvnncia~ lncMtrW iau.kllnp;
N.w muhif1mily ~ldirc, (ap,11rtmlffltt afld Sl,016 per permit o~ condominiumil NYi .. lhre. Of more dwellin& dtPosit dete,miend b'I ututs comtruded 1t the s.ame dm., not tiff with ch-1,1es at thtj indudirc U'le 1,u of pu1H, carports, •nd 1-5;,us 1-ffl.1' $0.0> t,M.;io fuijy a!loutod hou<ly SO.OS1111tr 11-.VC toll ,i(USSOry rai1ts for,, pe,rsonnel buek:Unss invovled phn; actual consultant costs,
For new 1oin.a'e 1nd tw1>f.afflitv rnldentl.al
buUdlf'lcs construc:lf'd at tM UrM time, not T~s f1tit s ncluded In
inctud.,. the .area of lilHIH. carports, and the valuations tables $0.056t)et s.quare IOOt .acus~ry bullcnnp
f.YWW
Fo, ttie iflst.all,a,tion or rt-locatiion of e,ch forced11, or l'Mtv-rv,,e ru,RHe o, burnt,, lnctvdinc ducts a(ld vftlti attuhed to SlolCh •~.-.ce, \IP OS 5'1•i OJ ,a>M f,00) ~, - $l" $1,t.lO
to Ind lncl-..diife l00.000 91.w'h 12t., kW)
For 1nsta1~uo ... ot ,tiocauo ... of ta<f'I IOfc<td•air Of &rillvlty•type tun.a<e CH' bumus. irdudi,.. OS SM.42 o, 5$0.96 S0.00 n•• $169 Sl'-20 duct, and vents attuhtd to such appllanc:•, over 100,000 Btu/h{Z3.J kW)
Fo, the Installation of uch lloo, furnace, o.s $884? 05 5$0.96 so.oo -· $169 $14.80 lnclu:Hrc..,,•nt
19 For the lnstatla\JC!n o, rfloc,1t1o,1 of uch
suspend,td ht.au,, fiKIHwd wall tw.n•r or floor. D.S $88.42 ... 5$0.96 so.oo $le.JI $169 $!4.80 mo~r.ttd 1,1Nt hu1•1
Minl,Splr.tUnlt D.S $88.42 u 5$0.96 so.oo __ ,. 169 S0.00 6PDltDSCYfflU 20 for the lnst.atbtion, relocatlon or replacement of uch .appliance w,it imt.aled and not
o.s ~!1142 05 -·K SOD() i111l1' $lff ¥la~..-- Included in an illlPtili.tnce ptrn'lit PltRtia Rf Addtt!Rm ll for tht rtp.ilt of, .altuatlon of., or addita n to •a(h l'iHHrog appt&ante, ,irfrla;e,ation uNt.
coa4i,. unit, i1bM>rptkln unit. or •.tCh heabn&,
0.5 ~ .. ! 0~ *• iaot ..... Sl6t
1U.1U coolire,, abl01ption or e-v.apOratiw coolirc
tyitem, indudin& N'ISla&tiOn of conttols
rqulated byll'lt>Me<Nl'KilllCOM
12!~!L '21!!1!1:tH2ll 11!516ml:R!~ imsml
411
City of Ancl•rson
For tM lmLitl,Uon or telocation of Heh boOtr
Dl<GfflP,HSGI'
to andtnc:luctina 3 honltP)'tWf 110.6 kW), or 0.5 *fl cs ~" - nd1 abtorpllon rv,.l"11 to and Jnclucifll
n~» $169
-~ 100,000 Stu/h {29.3 tw~
For tM ln,,talla11Qn Of' •ielou1tion of H(h bol"r
Ol(OfflP,it$$0r
owr 3 honepiowe, (10.6 IW) 10 .andilnc:ludinJ
lS horsepc,wer 0.15 ,m~ OJ$ i-Ul M
- .,.._.. U!>'I ~114 152. 7 lcWl, or eM:h absorpdon sytttm over 100.000 ltu/h
129.3 kW) 10 al'ld.l'ICtudirc 500,000 Btu/ta (lji,6
kWI
For tht lnsUIILIUon or rN>Utlon of Heh bol!.r
Dr<OfflP,HSOI'
awr 1Shorupowu(52.7 kW) to andlnd.tdll\f
30horsepower $1,-.U i11.a1 IHI.> wlUS
sn, ~~.z,, llOS.S liW). CH' each ibsorptiOfl sy,ttmovtr S00.000 lllu/h
lt46.ti l!IW) IO and "11;1\oldi"I 1,000,000 91~
1293.UW)
For tht ll'lstallaliof\ or ,ttoutlon of HCh boiltr
o,com~sor
owr 30 Nlt'St<pOwer (LD!J.S ltW) co and
lndudi,. SO horwpowe-r 15 m~u
IS tt.ou• 11)11) -n J 5S"'5 1176 kW}, o, tilth abiotpUon witem ovt-r 1,000,000 Btu/h
1293.l kW) to and9nc.ludi,.
l,7S0,000 Btu/h
ISU.9kW)
ll For the lnsultaUon. or •tlo<ation of tt<h boiltr
o, <ompre-ssor
owr5CthcNs~1(176kW)DIHCh
B s.3"6 l $UU4 soro 111".0 S.11 tn~ absorption svstem owr 1 ~ ,750.000 e,wh
Is12 9 kWI
For u cl'I ,1i1-Noclit1C uf'lit 10 ,1nd lll'ldudinf;
10.(X)()cubicfttt Sl"IJ $1'1.U S0.00 ll.11.tt $339
tl ~~ pt'f mlnvtt tcfml c,119 Lhl, 6nc.i...din1Mt~
altieht<I thttt10
23 For Heh ,1ir-Ntdiftl unit ow, 10.000cfm
15 SHil5 lS 1' $l'l.111 so.oo $bMIJ $SOB llt.
lt l'1191/S}
1Y1mraHY1 cPP!,n
2• Fo,
uch e-vaporat~ coo~, 01~r tl,a~
0.5 ld•I ~J S.,H so.oo
·-.. poruWttypt JI~
Yet!btfon tnd fxfttud
For e1ch~nUl,11ion fan co11"""tie-d to, sinale 0.S l,U.., •• _ .. S0
.00 ....... $169 17.H """ For each w nblate>n svi1em whkh Is. not a portion of any $1- i,,1 n so
.oo '""" $339
U H$ hutin1 Of a•·condiiUonln1 syitem authorile-d
bypermn
25 For the •r,s.tallalion (If e.ch liood wtiith i'l
serve-ct by IMChllr,ical
exNust. inc-lucAri& ttie ducts for sue~ flood
DT
412
City al Anderson
----------
1 t,. 1.-t ·• I
ReildenU.11
Comme,ctal
illllmlWl1
For the Installation or ,l'locauon of eath
domHtlctype
lncin.rato,
16 For the ln1.tai!Lalion °' rt'tocalion of Heh
comnwrdal o,
lnclustrial-twe lrtdnerator
lllllillllmll1
11 For each appl~nc:e or Pen of equ•J)l'Mnt
,._ullted 17{ the
Mec:Mnical Code but not claued in.ather
apc,llanc:e utf'IOl'iH,
or for whk:h the fu fS not lhttd
Fire PIM.e/Wood Stove
Dthl! rn,ffl!tsm 1nd f11,
lrispt<UOJIS ouUldtf'l«INI ~l'ltHMutior
t•pedittd l~tJons
~inspecUon fHs
lnt9t<tk>M to, wt.(:h no fH K 59Ktfk,ally
lndlc.at!Pd
l$ Addition.al pbn r!P\¥w chairgu •~irlPd bv
chartH,
additions. or re-Jlslon,: to plans for whkhan
initial
,niew tias Mfn col't'lpleted
Humhloc etrmlt fm
fGr 1tle ,nuance of e.ach plum bin I p«mit
l9 For IMtnu.nceo(uchwppltm,ntal permit
101 wtleth the ofi&INI Pf'mil Ni not explrtd,
bttn t.inult-d.or finaglifd
• h'Jtsm ,,. Scbd!:'11
Ne-w Rt'Udtn~I buildin111: fht foOowina IH1
Ulall include au pipn1 •n dplumblf't IH!ulpnwnt
In
or on Heh buihSiflL or other plumblrc
fQUiptNtll on lht Mme p,em!Hs COR$1fl,l(led
at1t,,e,-.im,e
lirnf•
- -- - ---- ---
~ : • , f •• • -t , • .. 1. • t "''" • , .,,
OS sau2
S3SU6
SU.42
$353.'6
,O.il0
•
u q,)M
$U>Ltl
u $MO ..
~m.-
u ~ .... ,.
$l6Ul
"'
.,.
~-
fs.lM ""'"' ll5 S!-UI .......
S..110 'l,l(.11,"I!
- 1t'14')
1'1-11> $IOS
s.,.eo .... ~ ..
SI.H t
S212
Sl6t
$671
Ul
"""
St62 JMt hot.at. l'rill'l1mu,n
ot1wohour1-
$162 per i.nspecuan,
M.rm'l1um OM hOur
$162 Ptf tiou,. mimmum
oronehaUMUr
S16.2 pe: hour, rn1n1mom
or one hall hour
53 REMOVE THIS FEE
UD..85
t1nli&
'4U9
SKSO
to••
IHC
SSS.«t ptrhOc.lr,ffllnlmum
olrwo h0ur$
$6$.00 per ln$pection,
IMnmumOnehoclr
$6S.00perhotlr. m.n1mum
ol ont ll.all nour
S65.00 pe, hour. m)namum
ol one hall hour
:ln&O
~7.2ti
413
City of Anderson
New Commerd&l ll"ldustl"' Butldtrcs;
New multifamily buildin&s (a~rtmtr"lts and $1,016 pe, permit or condo-minlums) h.wl,rc lhrtt o, mort dwelil'II depasit dettrmiend by units constru<ttd at the Ymt time, not staff with charg~s at thf'j lnc:lud ... tht ;ire-a of lilHBn, carp()fli, ;iind ~!Jt,4; _,. ,auo H # IU$ fuQv •!located hou<lv SO .OS ptt squart foot acnssory rates to, ,11 pe,rsonntl buildii.-.'li, per square foot i nvovl.cl plus ,ctu,11 I wnsulta11t costs,
fo, HW 51...,te ,1'14 two-f;iimity res~;il
bulldilrgs comtructed ,1l the-w~ time, not This fH is includ9<1 in $0 .056 per $qUMt fOOI inc:ludi"' the area of 1a-ra11H. carports. arid tht valua1ions tablts. acc.is.c,ry bl.J51dinirs. _,., kluar• foot
El!b!r:111!!5! ~1ni1
Fore,chplumbin,: rcxtu,t or lf1por1-tt or
Ol(lurtson ont trap Undudif'IC Witt,. <111itliJt ~.JS $44ll .. ll iU4l jl)(IO WOI Ji'1l lO fixtures - $98 S9.1Dfjtil l'I.Jililt plpin1 and 1Hcl;fll;>w Pff'VtnUon thtrfQf) perl)l'rmit EACM AOO'l FIXT\JIIE
~ '-'J 14u,,, Nexl 10 fi 1,ture,
- $SO 0.115 $l'.I.. suo ......... I) O.IJ - per permit
30 F(ltlfl),iir1 Ot ilttt•tbn ,a,td,,al~e Ot ~t ~,
™•t ., *" ~OI • io•->0 $169 per permit $4 1'5IM"'lf'I.Wr?- plP"'II, Heh lb:tl.ltl! stwtn DkPPHISVu,m11'H!lmcmmoo
For .ach buiiLc:111• sevri,ar and e.ach tr ler park ~ ..... , ~ U6 $!U.~ ,0(11
.. _ 5516 S2465
r-aruchcnspool REMOVE THIS FH $l7.2S
F(lr eut, p,rt,te sewa1e di't)OS,I• ~ttM REMOVE THIS FEE S74.SO For sch inckmrial w,11t• p-l!lrl!llm.nl
lnt.erceptor. lnd,xlins its 11.ap and wt1t. s11,.u Sl2l84 ~- s,u, SS,!13.lS 5553 S19
.90 H(eplinf: kitch•n-tvsw &r•~ intl!tCl!ptan
fun<tlonin1 .as fixtwe traps,
Grea,w Tra,p lntercie-pto, N<w n S88.42
- ~ SI0-96 05 m.68 $222
.0S 5222 S0.00
N-an-Gr.avily Sewer Systl!ffl Cwith a p.amp) H S8U2 01 $80.96 so.co $169.Ja S169 so.oo ll Ra,i11wat« SySlfMS. Pf' dt.aWI tinsldt bt.u""'1 OS SSU2 ·~ SI0-96 so.co $169.31 S169 $UO Will!: tllt!l!I: lm:I Wl!Sl UiHID
for insl.lliatlon. aflention, or res,,ir or waite,
pipiflJ: or waiter c,eattl'lef\t tQu'Pf'l'etiL o, both.
OS saa.•2 ... SI0-96 so.co bb.:.. $0" •><h
3l for l!Khwatet hie-ltff. jr,(fudi,'IJ: Yfr'lt sooo .. ~ SI0-96 S0.00 --
i ti.ll>
ii:11 tl1ID1JKl:1s:ml
For H<h ps pipin1 syste,m,af one t i> ~
DS saa.•2 Str•t.92 so.oo '2Y.S. $US outlets
33 Fo, 1u,ch addiUonal outlet owr f~ so.oo o.11 Sl1.Sl S0.00 W..61 $1 '9 Lin:&ad0Ma1 ~mmlts:l~Hll!!SI ~m!f:P.•w~dlafto.vkft
414
City of Anderson
ForNCh lawnsp,inkler sy,,tem on anyone,
meter, loclucl,.
bactflow pwentlon drJlcn t.,.reof
Fcir,1tmosphf'rit ~..,acwm ~,1hrs o•
bf(lflow~lon
deY!ctt. ont 10, ,,_. dtvl(:,s
For a\fflosphttlc typt \laitULim brealitrs or
b.Klllow prevention
r°' each badffow p..ewntlon dtvltt other
than atrncnp,Mrk l~ vKuum bre.1kers,, 2
•nchn (SO.I mml Ind smaltr
J4 ror Hth biickBow pt'l!W!nllan de-via othu
than at~rk: type vaicwm breakers, ow, l
,nc.he-s (SO.I mml
SwJromlmPootl
Ft:ireH:hpublk:f)Ool
Far each public SPI
For each private 'SWW'l'll'l\il'IJ pool
JS Fo,reKhpriva1esp,1
li!IKlllma!!1
Fc>r each aH'iaMe o, pte<e of equi~l
reau&ated by the Pll,lfflbiinJ Codf M l'I01 cLMseG
in othtr ,1~lar.c:e calflO'lts. or fo, which tht
ltt It, not listed
()th!f (nJDKtJOft fnd ftH
lnsp.c-Uons ouulde nounal bus.i11e-s, houn or
e11peditcd inw«IIOn,
lnt.pe:ctiom ro, which ro fH Is t.l)Kmcaly
lndi(atKI
:,, A!Odilional plan telnltw c~rges. requlr«-d by
cMr •. es . .addit'°"'"· or ,em1on1 to phns ro,
which .an it1itia1 rnil-w Ns been <ompleted
Other tnwutJons 1ncf Fm Inspections out,kle norm•I buMNH houn 1,,spectiol'IS for wtikt'i ,ro fff 1, 1pe,cif1ulty
lndicattd
MIKIIJMFOUS
~ ; ,,_.(I,• • •.,_ ,,., • 1., I '•••• ft r
0.5 $88.42 n $80.96
05 $4U2 "-J $80.96
0.5 $8U2 0.1- $80.96
$116.81 SL619l
S176.Bl $16192
INctUDED ABOVE
,..
.... .... 1
$0.00 f- $169
5000 ,_ $169
50.00 ,__,. $169
$0.00
_ ... SU9
51).00 $211-» $339
S162Ptth0u1,m1n1mum
oft\o\Ohol.r•s
St62 ~rinspect100,
HintmumOMnour
1l6'~ttQc.lr,m1mmum
of one hall hOUr
'S162Qetnour.m1nimom
ot one ti,1I hour
$162pethour, mrNmum
01twOhwrS
$162 i,ei' ltliPKUOl'I.
Minimumonet'Wklr
S162perhour, minimum
of one hall hour
SlA.80
$12.30
12.25 112.30
S24.65
19125
160.75
160.75
$30.25
S65.00l)tfhour, minimum
oJ~hours
S65.00 per inspecl'°'1.
Mn'llmum one h)ur
565.00 per tiou,, mIn!mum
ot ooebatt hour
SoS.Ol>Ptt"hCWr. minimum
ot o,r,e hill hour
$65.00Pffhoor, mintmum
ottwOhOurSi
$65.00 per 1n1,pee1ion.
minimum one hOur
$65.00 ptt !\our. minimum
or one-ti.alt hour
415
City of Anderson
Pt0pt,ty Hlno,y/Buikiin1 Plan Copy
G[!dlM Plan !Wm Em
SO cutNc yuds {3&,2 m3J or len
5110 lOOcubk Yirds(40 m3to 76.SmJ}
JDl lo 1,000 cubic ya,d,; 17.00
(77.2 ml to 764.6 ml)
1,001 to 10,000 cubk: y.mts
176S.Jm3 to 7.64SS mJ}
10,001 to 100,000 Cubk Vlflts
(7,646.3 m· to 76,4SS mll
100.001 to lOO.OOOcu'b'cyauH
176,456 M) tO 152,9111'1'131
38 200,0:U ci;blc yHds (152,912 mJ) or more
l!!lwlw
39 Addiliooal pl.ar1 review •eQYtred by chainae,,
aidcitlon1 or re'fflk>ns to approved ~•ns
GrdlDC Pcrmu fas
$0,;:ublcy.a,d1 lll.2 ml)or ~u.
o.~ ia).'6 o.s SS2.6t jll).k
S..00 $0<10 '$-105,JS. 110§. !IS-
.. ,
UM $000
SlOSptf'rft"iew, 11)0(; M"'lmoft\onthouf
,_LL GRADING IS NofH ENGINEERING
,_LL GRADING 1$ snso ENGINEERING
All GRADING IS S37.C0 ENGINEERING
"Ll GRADING IS S49.25 ENGINEERING
'$,11$.25 lo the Just t0.000
c::utMc ya Ids (7,64S.SM1~,
AUGRADll',G IS plus$24,50fOl'HCh
ENGINEERIOjG additional 10.(IQl)cubk:
y .. d1
(7,~.$m3)o,lfac;uon
$269.75 re,
·-Ille lust 100.000
c.ublcy¥ds
All GRADING IS C76,4SSm3),plusS13.251Gr
ENGINEERING eacll~1Uonil 10,000
<ublcyards (7.645.SmJIOI
lr,clionthffeol $402.25 !Of !lit 111st 200.000
,ublqatds
AJ GRACING 15 r1S2,911 n'l3J.plusS7.2Sfot
r N(ilNEERING eaclil~mONl 10.000
, 1i1~i:;yardsf 1,645.Stnl) Of
lfKMir'lt~I
All GRADING IS
ENGINEERING $0.00
$65.00pe,oour. v.ilha
minrmumc,.,_.eol
ont-Nl.lhQur
- n~11>
$111»
416
SI to 100 a,bk: pnh l40m3to76.Sm3)
101 to l OOOC\lbi< nlds 37.00
1n l m31016'.6m3}
l,001 to 10,CXIO <ubit yard,
17£5.]mJ ID 7,64S.S ml)
10,001 to 100,000 cubic Vlt"dS
11,646.3 m' to 16,45S m31
40 100,001 to lOO.OOOcubic varck
(76.456ml to lSl.911 mJI
$17 .50 fOf ~ach 1dchtional
LOOCubl'c:y•rds
SUM.5010fli~lit$t l,OCO
cubic yards (764.6 m3).
e:.:;hadditjl)na\
10.000 cubjc ~ards(7 .845.S
m3) or friction thereof
'919.00 ro, 1ne fitsc lCI0.000
cu~cyards
(76.•Ss m31, plus $36.50 ta.-
each add,1,onat 10,000
c:1.1bfc: vardi f7,&4$.5 tn3) or
11aclionthereof
S0.00
417
APPENDIX D - DETAIL OF ANIMAL CONTROL FEES
243
418
City of Anderson
Animal Control Fees
Altered I year - $ I 0
Altered 2 year - $18.50
Altered 3 year - $23
Altered/Senior 1 year - $5
Altered/Senior 2 year - $9.25
Altered/Senior 3 year - $11.50
Unaltered I year - $22
Unaltered 2 year - $39
Unaltered 3 year - $48
Unaltered/Senior 1 year - $12
Unaltered/Senior 2 year - $20.5
Unaltered/Senior 3 year - $25
244-
$10.00
$18.50
$23.00
$5.00
$9.25
$11.50
$22.00
$39.00
$48.00
$12.00
$20.50
$25.00
419
APPENDIX E - DETAIL OF PARKING ENFORCEMENT FINES
245
420
ANDERSON
Description Adopted Fee
RESTRICTED PARKING AREA, WITH SIGNS, WITHOUT PERMISSION $ 50.00 BICYCLE ON SIOEWAUC, BLOCKING PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC $ 50.00 PARKING IN BIKE IANE $ 50.00
RESTRICTED/NO PARKING ZONE $ 50.00
)>ARKING IN BUS ZONE OR WHEELCHAIR ACCESS $ 560.00
PARKING/STOPPING WITHIN 20' CLEARANCE ZONE $ 50.00
•ARKING/STOPPING IN FIRE IANE $ 50.00
OVER 18" FROM CURB/FACING WRONG WAY $ 50.00
DISABLED PARKING ZONE $ 560.00
)>ARKEO IN ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGE STALL WITHOUT CHARGING $ 50.00 JLOCKING/OBSTRUCTING ACCESS TO ELECTRIC VEHICLE STALL s 50.00 •ARKING WITHIN 15' OF FIRE HYDRANT s 50.00
UNATTENDED VEHICLE, RUNNING s S0.00
PARKING WITHIN 7.5' OF RAILROAD TRACKS s 50.00
PARKING WITHIN 3' DISABLED OR HANDICAPPED 560.00 ACCESS RAMP WITH SIGN OR RED PAINT $ S60.00 )>RINKING ALCOHOL IN PUBLIC $ 150.00
LOUD PARTIES. 1ST OFFENSE, 2ND OFFENSE Warnin~ont.-. 2ND OFFENSE $500 ~OCIAL HOST {CONSUMPTION OF AlODHOL BEVERAGESBEVERAGES BY MINORS], MISDEMEANOR PER 8.15. $ 1,000.00 )'ANHANOUNG, AGGRESSIVE SOUCITATIONS PROHIBITED $ 200.00 PANHANOUNG, SOUCITATIONS PROHIBITED AT SPECIFIC LOCATIONS s 150.00 )'Al.SE OR MISLEADING SOLICITATION PROHIBITEO $ 300.00
URINATION ANO DEFECATION PROHIBITED $ 300.00
~OITERING IN PARKING LOT WITHOUT PERMISSION s 150.00
~LEEPING IN PUBLIC, MISDEMEANOR $ 150.00
rAMPING IN PUBLIC AND CERTAIN PRIVATE PIACES, MISDEMEANOR $ 300.00 DUMPING, PUBLIC OR PRIVATE $ 50.00
PUBLIC PARKS VIOIATION $ 50,00
)>ROHIBITEO PARKING IN SPECIFIED PIACES $ 50.00
)>ROHIBITED PARKING AT CERTAIN TIMES $ S0.00
PARALLEL PARKING REQUIRED $ SO.DO
PARKING IN BUS LOADING ZONE $ 50.00
PARKING IN PASSENGER LOADING ZONE 13 min maxi $ 50.00
PARKING IN LOADING ZONE 120 min maxi $ SO.DO
~LLEV PARKING VIOIATION {3 min maxi s 50.00
~EHICLE LEFT ON HIGHWAY BLOCKING TRAFFIC $ SO.DO
PARKING WITHIN 100' TO SCHOOL PROPERTY $ 50.00
PARKING FOR MORE THAN 120 HOURS PROHIBITEO $ SO.DO
OBSTRUCTING PAIVA TE PROPERTY PROHIBITEO s SO.DO
"-A THERINGS-POUCE AUTHORITY TO PROHIBIT PARKING, $ 50.00 ~TORING, WORKING ON VEHICLE j4 hour max) $ 25.00
DE SIG NA TED FOR DISABLE OR HANDICAPPED s 560.00
ARKING PROHIBITED CCommerciaU s 25.00
421
APPENDIX F - DETAIL OF RECREATION FACILITY & FIELD RENTAL FEES 247
422
Scout Hall
Arts and Crafts Room
Community Center
Park Rentals
BBQ #1
BBQ#2
Riverview BBQ
Moose Grove BBQ
Cottonwood Grove BBQ
Bandshell
Gazebo
KC Grove#1
KC Grove#2
121,11:ilis e•.ieRI J;'.ee Park Soecial Event Fee
River Splash Pad Gazebo
River Splash Pad Private Rental
Old Softball Field (Overflow)
Soccer Field
Softball Field
City of Anderson
Facility and Field Rental Fees
Current Fee
$250 per rental
lus $350 refundable de osit
$10 per hour with a 3 hour minimum
plus $75 refundable deposit
$300 per rental
lus $500 refundable de osit
$75 per day
$50 per day
$50 per day
$50 per day
$75 per day
$75 per day
$75 per day
$50 per day
$50 per day
$200 perdav
$100 for 3 hour block
$100 per hour for 4 hour block
$100
$75 + $100 refundable field deposit,
includes lighting
$75 + $100 refundable field deposit,
includes liahtina
248
Proposed Fee
$425 per rental
lus $350 refundable de osit
Community Group - $75 per day
Other - $125 per day
olus $75 refundable deoosit
$650 per rental
lus $500 refundable de osit
$100 per day
$75 per day
$75 per day
$75 per day
$100 per day
Remove this fee
$150 per day
$75 per day
$75 per day
$200 per dav
$100 for 3 hour block
$100 per hour for 4 hour block
$100
$100 + $100 refundable field deposit,
includes lighting
$100 + $100 refundable field deposit,
includes Jiahtina
423
Amphiteatre
No Power/Lights
With Limited Power/Lights
With Limited Power/Lights
Ticketed Cost Event (Open to Public)
Refundable Deposit
City of Anderson
Facility and Field Rental Fees
Current Fee
$500 per day
$800 per day
$2,000 per day
$750 per event
Proposed Fee
$800 per day
$800 per day
$800 per day
$750 per event
424
250
425
AGENDA ITEM
February 3, 2026, City Council Meeting
To Be Presented By:
Ci Wheeler, Finance Director /Treasurer
To:
Through:
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Anderson City Council Joey Forseth-Deshais, City Manager
From:
Date:
I SUBJECT
Cindy Wheeler, Finance Director /Treasurer
February 3, 2026
Request for Proposal for Audit Services for City of Anderson for Fiscal Years ending 2026, 2027, and 2028.
I RECOMMENDATION
The Finance Director /Treasurer recommends that the City Council:
Publish a Request for Proposal for Auditing Services for the next three Fiscal Years:
2025-2026, 2026-2027, & 2027-2028, with the option to renew for two subsequent years.
I FISCAL IMPACT
No fiscal impact at this point.
l DISCUSSION and BACKGROUND
The annual audit, performed by an independent auditor, is necessary to ensure the City Council and the public that the City's finances are managed accurately, prudently, and in accordance with established legal and industry standards.
ITEM 8.5 PAGE1 2/3/2026
426
The Pun Group, LLP has performed our audit for the last three fiscal years but with the contract coming to an end staff would like to solicit proposals for auditing services while the two subsequent years option remains open with The Pun Group, should our request not be fruitful. Additionally, staying in line with best practice, a government entity should rotate auditors between three to seven years.
I ATTACHMENT
1. Draft Request for Proposal
ITEM 8.5 PAGE2 2/3/2026
427
INTRODUCTION
General Information
CITY OF ANDERSON
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
FOR AUDIT SERVICES
The City of Anderson is seeking proposals from qualified independent Certified Public Accounting firms to audit the financial statements of the City of Anderson for the fiscal years ending June 30, 2026, 2027, and 2028 with options for extensions for the fiscal years ending June 30, 2029, and 2030. The audits are to be conducted in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and 0MB Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-profit Organizations.
There is no expressed or implied obligation for the City of Anderson to reimburse responding firms for any expenses incurred in preparing proposals in response to this request.
To be considered, four copies of a proposal must be received by the City Clerk, City of Anderson, 1887 Howard Street, Anderson, CA 96007 on or before March 20, 2026 (5:00 p.m.). The City of Anderson reserves the right to reject any or all proposals submitted.
During the evaluation process, the City of Anderson reserves the right, where it may serve the City of Anderson's best interest, to request additional information or clarification from proposers, or to allow corrections of errors or omissions. At the discretion of the City of Anderson, firms submitting proposals may be requested to make oral presentations as part of the evaluation process. If necessary, interviews will be scheduled for April 1st and 2nd, 2026.
The City of Anderson reserves the right to retain all proposals submitted and to use any ideas in a proposal regardless of whether that proposal is selected. Submission of a proposal is acceptance by the firm of the conditions contained in this request for proposals unless clearly and specifically noted in the proposal submitted and confirmed in the contract between the City of Anderson and the firm selected.
It is anticipated the selection of a firm will be presented to the City Council for approval at their regular meeting on April 7, 2026.
Following the notification of the selected firm, it is expected a contract will be executed between both parties by May 1, 2026. A three-year contract with a twoyear extension option is contemplated. The two-year renewal option will be subject 428
COA Auditing Services RFP February 3. 2026
to review by the City Council and satisfactory negotiation of terms (including a price acceptable to both the City of Anderson and the selected firm).
Background of the City of Anderson
The City of Anderson is located on the west bank of the Sacramento River in southern Shasta County. The City services a population of 10,967. It is ten miles south of Redding (population 90,670) and 150 miles north of Sacramento, the state capital. The City was incorporated on January 16, 1956, as a general law city and it employs the council-manager form of government. The Council appoints a City Attorney as legal counsel and a City Manager who is the administrative head of the government. A Mayor and Vice-mayor are selected by the council from its members.
The City's fiscal year begins July 1 and ends on June 30. The City provides a full range of municipal services including police protection, maintenance of streets and other infrastructure; public improvements, planning and zoning, recreation and parks, utilities (water, sewer, and storm drainage), and general administrative services.
SCOPE OF THE WORK TO BE PERFORMED AND STANDARDS TO BE FOLLOWED The City of Anderson desires its Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) to be prepared by the Independent Auditors and be fully compliant with all required/applicable GASB statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2026, and each subsequent years June 30, 2027, and 2028 of the Audit Firm's contract with the City.
The following is a summary of the scope of the audit of the City of Anderson for the years ended June 30, 2026, 2027, and 2028:
1. The audit firm will perform an audit of all funds of the City of Anderson. The audit will be conducted in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller of the United States. The City's Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) will be prepared and work processed by the audit firm. The ACFR will be in full compliance with all required/applicable GASB statements. The audit firm will render their auditors' report on the basic financial statements which will include both GovernmentWide Financial Statements and Fund Financial Statements. The audit firm will also apply limited audit procedures to the Management's Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) and required supplementary information pertaining to the General Fund and each major fund of the City.
2. The audit firm will perform a single audit on the expenditures of federal grants in accordance with 0MB Circular A-133 and render the appropriate audit reports on Internal Control over Financial Reporting based upon the audit of the 429
COA Auditing Services RFP February 3, 2026
City's financial statements in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and the appropriate reports on compliance with Requirements Applicable to each Major Program, Internal Control over Compliance and on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards in Accordance with 0MB Circular A-133. The single audit report will include an appropriate schedule of expenditures of federal awards, footnotes, findings and questioned costs, and follow up on prior audit findings where required.
3. The audit firm shall perform agreed-upon auditing procedures pertaining to the City's GANN Limit (Appropriation Limit) and render a letter annually to the City regarding compliance.
4. The audit firm shall issue a separate "management letter" that includes recommendations for improvements in internal control that are considered to be non-reportable conditions.
6. The audit firm will be available during the fiscal year to help City resolve accounting issues that may arise.
The City finance staff will provide normal cooperation and assistance during the audit including pulling and refiling of supporting documents and reconciliations of major asset and liability balances. The City will complete year-end adjusting journal entries in anticipation of closing books and provide all backup to audit firm. City finance staff will prepare the MD&A, transmittal letter, and statistical tables. All other information and financial statements are the responsibility of the audit firm.
All working papers and reports are to be retained at the auditors' expense for a minimum of three years. The audit firm will be responsible for making working papers available to the City of Anderson or any government agencies included in the audit of federal grants.
REQUIRED REPORTS
The audit firm shall be responsible for the preparation and submission to the City in the following financial statements:
Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR)
The audit firm will also be responsible for preparing for the City's review then submitting the following reports:
Annual State Controller's Report entitled "Financial Transactions Report" for City
Form SF-SAC Data Collection form/or Reporting on audits a/States, Local Governments, and Non-profit Organizations submitted to the Single Audit Clearinghouse as required by 0MB Circular A-133
430
COAAuditing Services RFP
Annual Street Report to the State Controller for City
Assist in GASB 68, 87, & 96 schedule preparation for entry
TIMETABLE OF AUDIT WORK TO BE PERFORMED
It is anticipated that the audit work will be performed in phases:
A. Audit Planning and Interim Audit Work
February 3, 2026
Audit planning should take place during June or July. Documentation of systems of internal control and compliance and transaction testing should be completed during interim stage.
8. Final Examination
It is expected that the City's books will be closed and ready for audit in November of each year. The final audit report, financial statements and State Controller's reports are to be completed no later than December 31 of each year.
PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
The following material is required to be received by the proposal due date or the firm will not be considered:
1. Title Page - The title page shall show the proposal subject, the firm's name and contact person and the firm's California CPA License Number and Firm's Federal Identification Number
2. Cover Letter - The cover letter should briefly state the proposer's understanding of the work to be performed, the commitment to perform the work in the required time frame and statements as to why the firm believes it is best qualified to perform the engagement. The cover letter should also make a statement that the firm's offer is a firm, irrevocable offer for 60 days. The cover letter should indicate whether the firm is independent with respect to the City of Anderson and that the firm is an Equal Opportunity Employer.
3. Table of Contents
4. Proposer's Qualifications - The audit firm should set forth the following:
A. Qualifications and Related Experience of the Personnel Who Will Serve the City of Anderson - Resumes of the Partner, Manager and Senior Auditor should be included. Resumes should include all relevant 431
COA Auditing Services RFP February 3, 2026
experience education and CPA licenses and continuing education of the individuals over the past years.
B. Prior Experience Auditing Cities, and Other Local Governments - Sufficient information should be provided regarding current local government audit clients, and date that the client has been served.
Information should be provided regarding clients that the firm serves that have received the CSMFO and GFOA awards.
C. References of Local Government Clients - Provide a listing of at least five municipal clients for which the firm's local office serves.
D. Capabilities in General Consulting and Compliance Auditing - Provide any other information regarding general consulting and special audits provided by the firm.
5. Approach, Scope, and Timing of the Audit
A. Provide in sufficient detail the firm's approach to the City of Anderson audit, including procedures to be performed, tasks required as part of the A-133 single audit, the use of statistical sampling, the utilization of computers on the audit engagement, analytical procedures that may be used, the consideration of laws and regulations, assistance required from City staff and proposed segmentation of the audit.
Segmentation of the audit should include breakdown of hours required to perform the audit by classification and in total for the planning an interim, final audit procedures including ACFS and reports preparation.
B. Provide sufficient information of your firm's understanding of the Objectives and Scope of the Engagement - Specifics should be provided of the auditing standards to be followed and reports to be issued by the audit firm.
6. Award of Contract
The selected firm shall be required to enter into a written contract with the City of Anderson for auditing services in a form approved by City of Anderson legal counsel following formal approval by the City Council of the City of Anderson. This RFP and the proposal, or any part thereof, may be incorporated into and made a part of the final contract. The City of Anderson reserves the right to negotiate the terms and conditions of the contract with the selected firm.
432
COA Auditing Services RFP February 31 2026
7. Contract Term
It is the intent of the City of Anderson to award the contract for an initial three-year (3) period commencing with the fiscal year ending June 30, 2026, with the option to extend for two additional one-year periods, at City of Anderson's sole discretion.
8. Manner of Payment
Progress payments will be made on the basis of hours of work completed during the course of the engagement. Interim billings shall cover a period of not less than one (1) calendar month.
9. Termination of Agreement
The City of Anderson may terminate the agreement, with or without cause, by providing written notice of termination to proposer not less than thirty (30) working days prior to the effective termination date. The City of Anderson's only obligation in the event of termination will be payment of fees and expenses incurred up to and including the date of termination as specified in the notice of termination.
10. Use of Sub-Contractors
The intent to use sub-contractors to perform any portion of the work described in this RFP must be clearly stated in proposer's response. The response must include a description of the work that will be sub-contracted out, cost of fees and services, and the names and addresses of potential subcontractors.
Proposer shall be responsible for all services performed under the Agreement with the City of Anderson by sub-contractors. The selected firm shall not assign or transfer its interest in any contract or sub-contract for subcontractor services without the prior written consent of the City of Anderson.
11. Indemnity
Proposer assumes all risk of injury to its employees, agents, and sub• contractors, including loss of or damage to property, and shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Anderson, its Council Members, officers, employees, and agents from and against all claims, suits, or causes of action for injury to any person or damage to any property arising out of, or connected with, performance of work under the Agreement that does not 433
COA Auditing Services RFP February 3, 2026
result from the gross negligence or intentional misconduct of the City of Anderson, its Council Members, officers, employees or agents.
12. Insurance
Proposer shall maintain such insurance as will protect it from claims under Workers' Compensation laws, and such liability insurance as will protect against claims for damages for bodily injury, including death, and damages to property in accordance with the terms of the Agreement. Coverage of which is to be no less than $1,000,000/$2,000,000 per occurrence/aggregate, with the City of Anderson named as an additional insured.
The proposing firm must be willing and able to obtain an errors and omissions insurance policy for coverage of no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence for the willful or negligent acts of the firm and its officers, employees and agents.
Proposer shall maintain evidence of coverage in an updated form during the term of the Agreement.
13. Non-Discrimination Practices
Proposer shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, sex (including pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical condition), creed, national origin, color, disability as defined by law, disabled veteran status, Vietnam veteran status, religion, age, medical condition, marital status, ancestry, or sexual orientation.
14. Right to Audit
Proposer shall be responsible for ensuring the accuracy and propriety of all billings and shall maintain all supporting documentation for the period of three (3) years following completion of performance of the services.
The City of Anderson will have the right to audit firm's and sub-contractors' invoices and all supporting documentation for purposes of compliance with the Agreement.
Proposer shall cooperate fully with any audit of its billings conducted by the City of Anderson and permit access to its books, records, and accounts as may be necessary to conduct such audits.
15. Release of Information
Proposer shall not make public information releases or otherwise publish any information obtained or produced by it as a result of, or in connection with, 434
COA Auditing Services RFP February 3, 2026
the performance of services under the Agreement without prior written consent of the City of Anderson.
16. Use of the City of Anderson Name
Proposer shall not publish or use any advertising, sales promotion, or publicity in matters relating to services, equipment, products, reports, and material furnished by proposer in which the City of Anderson name is used, or its identity is implied, without prior written approval of the City of Anderson.
17. Conflict of Interest
Proposers shall identify any existing or potential conflict of interest in its proposal that is related to or arises from this RFP or the work contemplated to be performed herein or under the Agreement. Proposer shall agree not to accept any employment from or perform services with or for any other person, firm, or corporation where such employment is a conflict of interest or where such employment or service is likely to lead to a conflict between the City of Anderson interests and the interests of such person, firm, corporation, or any other third party.
When submitting any existing or potential conflict of interest information, such information shall be submitted on a colored paper different from the rest of the proposal and shall be clearly marked "Conflict of Interest."
18. Maximum Fee
The maximum fees for the audit of the City of Anderson should be provided in the following format for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2026, 202 7, and 2028. The fees should be inclusive of any out-of-pocket expenses incurred by the audit firm.
435
COA Auditing Services RFP February 3, 2026
Maximum Audit Fee for the Preparation of the
ACFS
Fee for the Preparation of Annual
State Controller's Report - City
Fee for the Preparation of Annual
Streets Report to State Controller
Fee for the Preparation of the SF-SAC
Total All-Inclusive Fee
Appendix "A"
Audit Summary Fee
Fiscal Year
2025-2026
Fiscal Year
2026-2027
Fiscal Year
2027-2028
436