Agenda packet — Angels Camp City Council, June 7, 2022

CITY HALL
CITY OF ANGELS PO Box 667, 200 Monte Verda St. Suite B, Angels Camp, CA 95222 P: (209) 736-2181

CITY OF ANGELS

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
June 7, 2022
THIS MEETING WILL BE HELD AT ANGELS FIRE HOUSE, 1404 VALLECITO ROAD AND WILL BE OPEN TO PUBLIC. MASKS ARE RECOMMENDED FOR ATTENDEES.

In person public attendance will be available with limited seating. Seats are available on a first come, first served basis. Members of the public shall have the right to observe and offer public comment at the appropriate time. To view or participate in the meeting online, please use the following link:

Google Meet joining info
Video call link: https://meet.google.com/bfn-ezik-fue
Or dial: (US) +1 630-634-5291 PIN: 858 431 338#
CITY COUNCIL appreciates your interest and encourages your participation. Regularly scheduled meeting are held the 1 st and 3rd Tuesday of each month. The Agenda is divided into two sections:

CONSENT AGENDA: These matters include routine financial and administration actions and are usually approved by a single majority vote.

REGULAR AGENDA: These items include significant financial and administration actions of special interest, hearings and work sessions.

The numerical order of the items on this agenda is for convenience of reference. Items may be taken out of order upon request of the Mayor or Council Members. All questions shall be directed to the Mayor who, at his/her discretion, will refer to Staff.

Mayor Alvin Broglio Vice Mayor Jennifer Davis-Herndon
Council Members Gretel Tiscornia, Isabel Moncada, Caroline Schirato City Administrator Rebecca Callen City Attorney Doug White 5:00 p.m. CLOSED SESSION

1. ROLL CALL

2. PUBLIC COMMENT
The public may address the Council on any item of public interest not otherwise on the agenda that is within the jurisdiction of the City. No action may be taken. Matters to be addressed may be referred to City Staff or placed on a subsequent meeting Agenda. Speakers are limited to five minutes per person.

3. ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION
A. Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation, Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)
Name of Case: Susan Wenger v. City of Angels Camp and Doe’s 1-10, Case No. 21CV45372

CITY HALL
CITY OF ANGELS PO Box 667, 200 Monte Verda St. Suite B, Angels Camp, CA 95222 P: (209) 736-2181 B. Conference with Legal Counsel – Potential Litigation Pursuant to Government Code Section 53069.85
Liquidated Damages
C. Property Negotiations, APN: 060-012-012, Adjacent to 1276 South Main St. Angels Camp, Potential Rental, Martiza Dominguez
D. Property Employment Performance Evaluation (Gov. Code Section 54957) Title: City Administrator/Manager
6:00 p.m. REGULAR MEETING

1. ROLL CALL

2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

3. REPORT OUT OF CLOSED SESSION
A. Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation, Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)
Name of Case: Susan Wenger v. City of Angels Camp and Doe’s 1-10, Case No. 21CV45372
B. Conference with Legal Counsel – Potential Litigation Pursuant to Government Code Section 53069.85
Liquidated Damages
C. Property Negotiations, APN: 060-012-012, Adjacent to 1276 South Main St. Angels Camp, Potential Rental, Martiza Dominguez
D. Property Employment Performance Evaluation (Gov. Code Section 54957) Title: City Administrator/Manager

4. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA AS POSTED (OR AMENDED)

5. PUBLIC COMMENT
The public may address the Council on any item of public interest not otherwise on the agenda that is within the jurisdiction of the City. No action may be taken. Matters to be addressed may be referred to City Staff or placed on a subsequent meeting Agenda. Speakers are limited to five minutes per person.

6. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approval of May 3rd, 2022 Regular Meeting Draft Minutes B. Approval of May 17th, 2022 Regular Meeting Draft Minutes C. Reappointment of Planning Commissioners Gary Gordon and Joseph Whittle, to Full Three (3) Year Terms on the Planning Commission Commencing July 1, 2022 and extending through June 30, 2025, Amy Augustine, City Planner
D. Approval of Resolution No. 22-26, Requesting the Board of Supervisors of Calaveras County to Consolidate the City of Angels Election with the Election to be Held on November 8th, 2022, Rose Beristianos, City Clerk

7. REGULAR AGENDA
A. Adopt Resolution No. 22-25 Declaring Intention to Form Landscape and Lighting District No. 2 – Greenhorn Creek to Replace Existing Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1 – Greenhorn Creek, Rebecca Neilon, City Engineer

CITY HALL
CITY OF ANGELS PO Box 667, 200 Monte Verda St. Suite B, Angels Camp, CA 95222 P: (209) 736-2181 B. Discussion and Approval of a Budget Amendment for Water Line Replacement Project Overage, Rebecca Callen, City Administrator
C. Discussion and Direction of City Council Representation Changes for Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) and Destinations Angels Camp (DAC), Rebecca Callen, City Administrator D. Discussion and Direction to Award a Contract to CSG Consultants, Inc (CSG) for Building Official, Plan Review, and Code Compliance, Rebecca Callen, City Administrator E. Discussion and Direction on the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Proposed Budget, Rebecca Callen, City Administrator

8. ADMINISTRATION REPORT

9. COUNCIL REPORT

10. CORRESPONDENCE
A. Greenhorn Creek Landscape and Lighting District, Richard Gutierrez B. News and Notes for the Week of May 2, 2022
C. News and Notes for the Week of May 9, 2022
D. News and Notes for the Week of May 16, 2022
E. News and Notes for the Week of May 23, 2022
F. Angels Camp Business Association, Letter to City Council for Support Fiscal Year 2022/2023 Budget

11. CALENDAR

12. ADJOURNMENT
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk at City Hall 209-736-2181,. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to the meeting (28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title II) Materials related to an item on this Agenda submitted to the City Council after distribution of the Agenda packet are available for public inspection at City Hall at 200 Monte Verda Street Ste. B, Angels Camp, CA 95222 during normal business hours. The Agenda is also available on line at www.angelscamp.gov.

City of Angels Council Meeting
JUNE 7, 2022 CONSENT AGENDA 6.A

A. Approval of May 3rd, 2022 Regular Meeting Draft Minutes ___________________________________________________________________

CITY HALL
CITY OF ANGELS PO Box 667, 200 Monte Verda St. Suite B, Angels Camp, CA 95222 P: (209) 736-2181

DRAFT MINUTES CITY OF ANGELS, CITY COUNCIL REVISED AGENDA May 3, 2022
THIS MEETING WILL BE HELD AT ANGELS FIRE HOUSE, 1404 VALLECITO ROAD AND WILL BE OPEN TO PUBLIC. MASKS ARE RECOMMENDED FOR ATTENDEES.

Google Meet joining info
Video call link: https://meet.google.com/bfn-ezik-fue
Or dial: (US) + 1 630-634-5291 PIN: 858 431 338#
CITY COUNCIL appreciates your interest and encourages your participation. Regularly scheduled meeting are held the 1st and 3rd Tuesday of each month. The Agenda is divided into two sections:

CONSENT AGENDA: These matters include routine financial and administration actions and are usually approved by a single majority vote.

REGULAR AGENDA: These items include significant financial and administration actions of special interest, hearings and work sessions.

Mayor PRESENT Alvin Broglio Vice Mayor PRESENT Jennifer Davis-Herndon Council Members ALL PRESENT Gretel Tiscornia, Isabel Moncada, Caroline Schirato City Administrator Rebecca Callen City Attorney Doug White - STAFF PRESENT 5:00 p.m. CLOSED SESSION

1. ROLL CALL

3. ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION
A. Conference with Labor Negotiators (Gov’t Code Section 54957.6) Agency Designated Representative: Rebecca Callen, City Administrator Employee Organization: City of Angels Employee’s Association (Exempt) B. Property Negotiations APN: 058-015-011
Agent: Mariposa Amador Calaveras Tuolumne (MACT) Health Board, Amy Augustine, City Planner

CITY HALL
CITY OF ANGELS PO Box 667, 200 Monte Verda St. Suite B, Angels Camp, CA 95222 P: (209) 736-2181 6:00 p.m. REGULAR MEETING

1. ROLL CALL

2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

3. REPORT OUT OF CLOSED SESSION
A. Conference with Labor Negotiators (Gov’t Code Section 54957.6) Agency Designated Representative: Rebecca Callen, City Administrator Employee Organization: City of Angels Employee’s Association (Exempt) B. Property Negotiations APN: 058-015-011
Agent: Mariposa Amador Calaveras Tuolumne (MACT) Health Board, Amy Augustine, City Planner REPORT OUT OF CLOSED SESSION: DIRECTION GIVEN TO STAFF

4. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA AS POSTED (OR AMENDED)
ACTION: MOTION TO APPROVE THE AGENDA AS REVISED BY VICE MAYOR HERNDON, SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER SCHIRATO, PASSED 5 YES

5. PUBLIC COMMENT - NONE

6. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Draft Minutes April 19, 2022, Rose Beristianos, City Clerk B. Approval of Two-Year Extension with Adams Ashby for CDBG Consultant Services, Rebecca Callen, City Administrator
C. Adopt Resolution No. 22-15, Approving Feeney Park Foundation Mr. Frog’s Wild Ride Through a Portion of Angels Camp, Amy Augustine, City Planner
D. Adopt Resolution No. 22-16, Authorizing the City to Continue a Hybrid Virtual Meeting Environment, Mayor and City Council, Rose Beristianos, City Clerk

ITEM A PULLED
ACTION: MOTION TO APPROVE ITEMS B, C, AND D BY COUNCIL MEMBER MONCADA, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER SCHIRATOR, AND PASSED 5 YES
ACTION: MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM A, BY VICE MAYOR HERNDON, SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER MONCADA, AND PASSED 4 YES 1 ABSTAIN

7. REGULAR AGENDA
A. Discussion and Approval of Working with PARS to Establish an IRS 115 Trust and Approve an Initial $275,769 Contribution of Funding, Rebecca Callen, City Administrator PUBLIC COMMENT: TIM OSKEY IN FAVOR
ACTION: MOTION TO APPROVE WORKING WITH PARS TO ESTABLISH AN IRS 115 AND APPROVE AN INITIAL CONTRIBUTION OF $275,769 BY COUNCIL MEMBER SCHIRATO, SECOND BY MAYOR BROGLIO, PASSED 5 YES

CITY HALL
CITY OF ANGELS PO Box 667, 200 Monte Verda St. Suite B, Angels Camp, CA 95222 P: (209) 736-2181 B. PUBLIC HEARING: Item 1, Appeal of April 14, 2022 Planning Commission Denial of a Variance for Reduced Setbacks for a Carport at 195 Rocky Ridge Item 2, Request to Waive the $626.67 Appeal Fee, Amy Augustine, City Planner
I. Receive Staff Report - GIVEN
II. Open Public Hearing - OPENED
III. Receive Public Comment –

LORAINE HADDOCK HOME OWNER SPOKE REGARDING THE VARIANCE AND SETBACK

JOHN CROOK, IN FAVOR

SCOTT REYNOLDS, IN FAVOR

SUSAN KAMPI, IN FAVOR

TIM OSKEY, IN FAVOR

TERESA LIVEN, IN FAVOR

CHERYL HOAG, FINISHED READING THE HOME OWNERS LETTER, SPOKE ABOUT THE PLANNING

COMMISSION MEETING, MENTIONED ETHICS AND HOW SOME COUNCIL SHOULD RECUES

THEMSELVES FROM THE VOTE

JOE OLIVERIA, IN FAVOR

RICK BROWN, IN FAVOR
IV. Close Public Hearing- CLOSED
ACTION: ITEM 1, MOTION TO APPROVE THE VARIANCE BY MAYOR BROGLIO, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER SCHIRATO, AND PASSED 3 YES 2 NO
ACTION: ITEM 2, MOTION NOT TO APPROVE THE WAIVER BY COUNCIL MEMBER TISCORNIA, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER MONCADA, AND PASSED 5 YES
C. Approve a Contract with Michelle Gonzalez for Finance Director, Rebecca Callen, City Administrator ACTION: MOTION TO APPROVE CONTRACT BY COUNCIL MEMBER MONCADA, SECONDED BY VICE MAYOR HERNDON, PASSED 5 YES
D. Discussion of Financial Review March 2022 and Approval of Budget Amendments, Rebecca Callen, City Administrator

DISCUSSION ONLY
E. Discussion and Approval of a Standard City Logo, Rebecca Callen, City Administrator PUBLIC COMMENT:

CHRISTY MIRO, QUESTIONED THE PLACEMENT OF THE FROG

TIM OSKEY MENTIONED THE HISTORY OF THE CURRENT LOGO

AMANDA FOLENDORF MENTIONED PUBLIC INPUT
ACTION: MOTION TO PUT THE LOGO OUT FOR PUBLIC INPUT AND VOTE BY MAYOR BROGLIO, SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER SCHIRATO, PASSED 5 YES
F. Discussion Regarding the Homeless Issues in the City Limits, Rebecca Callen, City Administrator

DISCUSSION ONLY
PUBLIC COMMENT:

CHRISTY MIRO MENTIONED RESOURCE CONNECTION AND A BOOK THAT THEY CREATE WITH EVERY COMMUNITY RESOURCE AVAILABLE TO CITIZENS. THAT IT MAY BE A GOOD RESOURCE TO HAVE AT CITY

HALL OR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT

CITY HALL
CITY OF ANGELS PO Box 667, 200 Monte Verda St. Suite B, Angels Camp, CA 95222 P: (209) 736-2181

8. ADMINISTRATION REPORT - GIVEN

9. COUNCIL REPORT – ALL REPORTED OUT

10. CORRESPONDENCE
A. Informational Staff Report Related to Alleged Brown Act Violation at the April 5, 2022, City Council Meeting
B. News and Notes for the Week of April 11,2022
C. News and Notes for the Week of April 18, 2022

11. CALENDAR – CLERK EMAILED TO COUNCIL

12. ADJOURNMENT
ACTION: MOTION TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 8:52PM BY VICE MAYOR HERNDON, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER SCHIRATO, PASSED 5 YES
___________________________
Alvin Broglio, Mayor
__________________________
Rose Beristianos, City Clerk
City of Angels Council Meeting
JUNE 7, 2022 CONSENT AGENDA 6.B

B. Approval of May 17th, 2022 Regular Meeting Draft Minutes ___________________________________________________________________

CITY HALL
CITY OF ANGELS PO Box 667, 200 Monte Verda St. Suite B, Angels Camp, CA 95222 P: (209) 736-2181

DRAFT MINUTES, CITY OF ANGELS, CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
May 17, 2022
THIS MEETING WILL BE HELD AT ANGELS FIRE HOUSE, 1404 VALLECITO ROAD AND WILL BE OPEN TO PUBLIC. MASKS ARE RECOMMENDED FOR ATTENDEES.

CONSENT AGENDA: These matters include routine financial and administration actions and are usually approved by a single majority vote.

REGULAR AGENDA: These items include significant financial and administration actions of special interest, hearings and work sessions.

Mayor Alvin Broglio (PRESENT) Vice Mayor Jennifer Davis-Herndon (PRESENT) Council Members Gretel Tiscornia (PRESENT), Isabel Moncada(PRESENT), Caroline Schirato (ABSENT) City Administrator Rebecca Callen City Attorney Doug White (PRESENT) 5:00 p.m. CLOSED SESSION

1. ROLL CALL

2. PUBLIC COMMENT

VON TRIBBLE MENTIONED THE HOMELESS DISCUSSION AND HOW THE CITY AND THE LOT NEXT TO IT HAVE LITTER, REFERENCED CHAPTER 8.10 OF CITY ORDINANCE, MENTIONED HE HAS HAD PROPERTY STOLEN AND

OR DAMAGED

3. ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION
A. PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION (Gov. Code Section 54957) Title: City Administrator/Manager
B. Property Negotiations APN: 058-015-011
Agent: Mariposa Amador Calaveras Tuolumne (MACT) Health Board, Rebecca Callen, City Administrator

CITY HALL
CITY OF ANGELS PO Box 667, 200 Monte Verda St. Suite B, Angels Camp, CA 95222 P: (209) 736-2181 6:00 p.m. REGULAR MEETING

1. ROLL CALL

2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

3. REPORT OUT OF CLOSED SESSION
A. PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION (Gov. Code Section 54957) Title: City Administrator/Manager
B. Property Negotiations APN: 058-015-011
Agent: Mariposa Amador Calaveras Tuolumne (MACT) Health Board, Rebecca Callen, City Administrator

CLOSED SESSION TO RECONVIEN AT THE END OF THE MEETING

4. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA AS POSTED (OR AMENDED)
ACTION: MOTION TO APPROVE AGENDA AS POSTED BY VICE MAYOR HERNDON, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER MONCADA, PASSED 4 YES 1 ABSENT

5. PUBLIC COMMENT

SUSAN RUDOLPH, THANKED STAFF REGARDING THE HOMELESS

SANDY MEYERS, SPOKE ABOUT THE FARMERS MARKET
NATE PRY, SPOKE ABOUT THE PANCAKE BREAKFAST HAPPENING ON MAY 20TH AND 21ST AT UTICA PARK

CARLA SANTIAGO, SPOKE ABOUT CLOTHES LINES HANGING IN DOWNTOWN ANGELS CAMP AND THE TREES

BLOCKING THE VIEW

KATHY RUSSEL, SPOKE ABOUT JUNIOR FROG JUMP AND THANKED COUNCIL AND STAFF

6. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approval to Waive Fees for Jumping Frog Motel Sign and Building Permit for Work Done in Conjunction with Murphys Grade Road Sidewalks, Amy Augustine, City Planner B. Authorization for City Administrator to Sign Ratification of Helix Contract / Task Order No. 2, for An Increase of $14,0000 to Complete Regulatory Wetlands Permitting Work for the Phase 1 Sewer (East Trunk/Vallecito Road Sewer line) Project, Amy Augustine, City Planner
C. Approval of Resolution No. 22-17, Approving the City’s Participation in the Public Agency Retirement Services (PARS) Post-Employment Benefits and Pension Trust Program (Section 115 Pension Trust Fund) to be Administered by PARS, with US Bank as Trustee, Delegating Section 115 Trust Fund Activity to the Director of Finance and Authorizing the City Administrator to Execute the Documents to Implement the Program, Rebecca Callen, City Administrator
D. Approval of Resolution No. 22-18, Rescind Resolution No. 21-03 Designating Authorized Signers, Including the Finance Director on the City of Angels Bank Accounts, Rose Beristianos E. Monthly AP Check Issued April, Michelle Gonzalez, Finance Director ACTION: MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR BY MAYOR BROGLIO, SECONDED BY VICE MAYOR HERNDON, PASSED 4 YES 1 ABSENT

7. REGULAR AGENDA
A. Discussion and Presentation of OPEB and PERS Modeling with GovInvest, Rebecca Callen, City Administrator

DISCUSSION ONLY

CITY HALL
CITY OF ANGELS PO Box 667, 200 Monte Verda St. Suite B, Angels Camp, CA 95222 P: (209) 736-2181 B. Discussion and Presentation by Destination Angels Camp, Debbie Ponte

DISCUSSION BY REBECCA CALLEN

DISCUSSION BY TIM OSKEY
2, LETTERS OF SUPPORT READ BY TIM OSKEY

DAVE VACCAREZZA SPOKE RATHER THEN HAVING TIM OSKEY READ HIS LETTER DEBBIE PONTE SPOKE ABOUT D.A.C. WITH COUNCIL, QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL ANSWERED BY DEBBIE C. Consideration of a Resolution No. 22-21 Declaring the Intention to Continue Assessments for FY 2022-23, Preliminarily Approving Engineers Report and Providing Notice of Hearing on July 19, 2022, for the Landscaping & Lighting District No. 1, Greenhorn Creek Assessment, Kyle Tankard, SCI Consulting Group DISCUSSION / PRESENTATION ON BOTH ITEMS C AND D.

PUBLIC COMMENT:

WES KLUM – DISCUSSION ON ENGINEERS REPORT

RICHARD GUTIERREZ- ASKED WHEN IS THE LAST DAY TO ACCEPT COMMENTS ON ENGINEERS REPORT,

SPOKE ABOUT ITEMS NOT ON THE CALCULATION IN THE ENGINEERS REPORT ACTION: MOTION TO APPROVING RESOLUTION NO. 22-21, APPROVING THE ENGINEERS REPORT AND SETTING JULY 19, 2022 NOTICE OF HEARING BY MAYOR BROGLIO, SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER MONCADA. 3 YES, 1 ABSENT, 1 ABSTAIN
D. Adopt Resolution No. 22-22, Declaring Intention to Form Landscaping & Lighting District No. 2 – Greenhorn Creek to Replace Existing Landscaping & Lighting District No. 1 – Greenhorn Creek and Resolution No. 22-23, Adopting Proposition 218 Assessment Ballot Procedures, Kyle Tankard, SCI Consulting Group ACTION: ADOPT RESOLTUION NO. 22-22, FORM LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 2, AND ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 22-23, ADOPTING PROPOSITION 218 BY VICE MAYOR HERNDON, SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER MONCADA, PASSED 3 YES, 1 ABSENT, 1 ABSTAIN
E. Discussion and Approval of the Revised Citygate Proposal, Rebecca Callen, City Administrator

DISCUSSION REVISED CITYGATE PROPOSAL
ACTION: COUNCIL MEMBER MONCADA MADE THE MOTION TO APPROVE THE CITYGATE PROPOSAL, SECOND BY VICE MAYOR HERNDON, PASSED 4 YES, 1 ABSENT
F. Discussion and Approval of Resolution No. 22-20, Adopting Discontinuation of Residential Service for NonPayment (SB 998), Rebecca Callen, City Administrator

DISCUSSION
ACTION: COUNCIL MEMBER MONCADA MADE THE MOTION TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 22-20, SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER TISCORNIA AND PASSED 4 YES, 1 ABSENT
G. Approval of Resolution No. 22-19, Approving the MOU Negotiation Between Angels Camp Exempt Employees and the City of Angels for a Term Beginning May 22, 2022 through June 30, 2024, Rebecca Callen, City Administrator

DISCUSSION
STAFF COMMENTS BY SCOTT ELLIS, CLAIRIFICATION ON SECTION 11 ACTION: MOTION TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 22-19 BY VICE MAYOR HERNDON, SECOND BY MAYOR BROGLIO, PASSED 4 YES 1 ABSENT
H. Discussion of Financial Review April, 2022, Rebecca Callen, City Administrator

DISCUSSION

8. ADMINISTRATION REPORT – CITY ADMINISTRATOR PROVIDED REPORT

9. COUNCIL REPORT – COUNCIL PROVIDED THEIR REPORT

10. CORRESPONDENCE
A. Greenhorn Greek Landscape and Lighting District, Richard Gutierrez

CITY HALL
CITY OF ANGELS PO Box 667, 200 Monte Verda St. Suite B, Angels Camp, CA 95222 P: (209) 736-2181

11. CALENDAR – CITY CLERK EMAILED TO COUNCIL

12. ADJOURNMENT
ADJOURNMENT TO CLOSED SESSION AT 9:12PM
RECONVEN FROM CLOSED SESSION AT 9:22PM
REPORT OUT OF CLOSED SESSION, CITY ADMINISTRATOR RECEVIED A SATISFACTORY RATING OF 4 OR

HIGHER, DIRECTION WAS GIVEN TO STAFF
ACTION: MOTIN TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 9:24PM BY VICE MAYOR HERNDON, SECOND BY MAYOR BROGLIO, PASSED 4 YES 1 ABSENT
_________________________
_________________________ Alvin Broglio, Mayor
Rose Beristianos, City Clerk
City of Angels Council Meeting
JUNE 7, 2022 CONSENT AGENDA 6.C

C. Reappointment of Planning Commissioners Gary Gordon and Joseph Whittle, to Full Three (3) Year Terms on the Planning Commission, Commencing July 1, 2022 and Extending though June 30, 2025, Amy Augustine, City Planner ___________________________________________________________________ DATE: June 7, 2022
TO: City Council
FROM: Amy Augustine, AICP City Planner
RE: REAPPOINT GARY GORDON AND JOSEPH WHITTLE TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION

RECOMMENDATION
Reappoint Commissioners Gary Gordon and Joseph Whittle to full three-year terms on the Planning Commission commencing July 1, 2022, and extending through June 30, 2025.

BACKGROUND
Two Planning Commissioner’s terms expire June 30, 2022: Gary Gordon and Joseph Whittle. Both Mr.

Gordon and Mr. Whittle have asked to continue serving on the Planning Commission. Mr. Gordon is the Planning Commission vice-chair and was sworn in on the Planning Commission on January 14, 2015. Mr.

Whittle was sworn in on March 10, 2022, to fill an unexpired term left by the resignation of Commissioner Dean Linton.

Numerous planning projects are expected to come before the Planning Commission in the coming months (e.g., citywide rezoning, design and CEQA guidelines). A full slate of Planning Commissioners, especially commissioners with knowledge of planning processes and design guidelines, will be essential to ensuring that timely action can be taken on pending planning projects.

DISCUSSION
City Council has the option of directing staff to advertise an opening(s) for the vacancies. Past practice has been to advertise for vacancies only when existing commissioners do not want to be reappointed to expiring terms. Planning Staff is recommending that Commissioners Gordon and Whittle each be reappointed to a full three-year term.

The next commission appointment or vacancy will on June 30, 2023, when the term of one Planning Commissioner expires. Two additional Planning Commissioner terms will expire on June 30, 2024.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact from this proposed action.

ATTACHMENTS:

None.

City of Angels Council Meeting
JUNE 7, 2022 CONSENT AGENDA 6.D

D. Approval of Resolution No. 22-26, Requesting the Board of Supervisors of Calaveras County to Consolidate the City of Angels Election with the Election to be Held on November 8th, 2022, Rose Beristianos, City Clerk ___________________________________________________________________

CITY HALL
CITY OF ANGELS PO Box 667, 200 Monte Verda St. Suite B, Angels Camp, CA 95222 P: (209) 736-2181 DATE: June 7, 2022
TO: City Council
FROM: Rose Beristianos, Administrative Services Officer / City Clerk RE: ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 22-26 REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF

CALAVERAS COUNTY TO CONSOLIDATE THE CITY OF ANGELS ELECTION WITH THE ELECTION TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 8, 2022

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the adoption of resolution 22-26 to consolidate the City’s election of Council Members with the Election to be held on November 8, 2022.

DISCUSSION
The City of Angels, City Council has three (3) members whose terms are expiring on 1/4/2022. Those seats are currently filled by Alvin Broglio, Olga Isabel Moncada and Caroline Schirato. Election Code §10403 requires jurisdictions to file with the Board of Supervisors, and the County Clerk, a resolution requesting consolidation with the Regular Presidential General Elect Resolution 22-26 requests that the Calaveras County Board of Supervisors consolidate the City’s election with the election to be held on November 8, 2022.

The City agrees to reimburse the County Elections Department for actual costs accrued as a result of this consolidation. The City further acknowledges that the consolidated election will be held and conducted in the manner prescribed in Election Code §10418.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
There will be a financial impact, however I have not heard back from the Elections Department as to what it will be.

CITY OF ANGELS

CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION No. 22-26

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANGELS CITY COUNCIL REQUESTING THE BOARD

OF SUPERVISORS OF CALAVERAS COUNTY TO CONSOLIDATE THE DISTRICT ELECTION WITH THE ELECTION HELD ON NOVEMBER 8, 2022
WHEREAS, an election will be held within the City of Angels within Calaveras County on Tuesday November 8, 2022, for the purpose of electing Governing Board Members; and WHEREAS, Election Code § 10403 requires jurisdictions to file with the Board of Supervisors, and the County Clerk, a resolution requesting consolidation with said election.

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Angels requests the Board of Supervisors of Calaveras County to consolidate the City Election with the election to be held on November 8, 2022 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City agrees to reimburse the County Elections Department for actual cost accrued as a result of this consolidation. The City acknowledges that the consolidated election will be held and conducted in the manner prescribed in Election Code § 10418 ON A MOTION by _____________________ seconded by _________________________________the forgoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote on this 7th day of June 2022.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
__________________________
Alvin Broglio, Mayor
_______________________
Rose Beristianos,
City Clerk

City of Angels Council Meeting
JUNE 7, 2022 REGULAR AGENDA 7.A

A. Adopt Resolution No. 22-25, Declaring Intention to Form Landscape and Lighting District No. 2 – Greenhorn Creek to Replace Existing Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1 – Greenhorn Creek, Rebecca Neilon, City Engineer ___________________________________________________________________ DATE: June 7, 2022
TO: City Council
FROM: Rebecca Neilon, Engineering Department
RE: Resolution No. 22-25 to Declare Intention to Form Landscaping & Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek to Replace Existing Landscaping & Lighting District No. 1 – Greenhorn Creek.

RECOMMENDATION
The City Council:

1. Adopt Resolution No. 22-25 declaring intention to form Landscaping & Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek and levy assessments, preliminarily approving the Engineer’s Report, providing notice of Public Hearing, and ordering the mailing of the assessment ballot.

BACKGROUND
The City of Angels Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1 – Greenhorn Creek (District) was formed by the City Council on June 6, 1995, through the Landscape and Lighting District Act of 1972 (Act). It was created to fund the maintenance of landscaping, lighting, cultural and wildlife areas, local infrastructure, environmental mitigation services, and related improvements within the Greenhorn Creek development.

At 25-years old, the District is no longer meeting the expectations of the residents it was created to benefit. The District is seeing infrastructure such as footpath bridges, streetlights, and monument signs in need of major maintenance/replacement with no funds in the District budget available to accomplish this task. The District annual budget is insufficient to maintain the infrastructure in the District and aggravating the budget is the lack of a mechanism to capture annual escalation costs. The annual assessment rate is currently levied at the maximum rate ($300) and legally cannot be increased without conducting a Proposition 218 balloting.

On March 15, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 22-11, initiating proceedings for the formation of the proposed Landscaping & Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek pursuant to provisions of Division 15, part 2, of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and designating SCI Consulting Group as the Engineer of Record.

Should the proposed Landscaping & Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek receive voters' approval and be approved by the City Council, it will replace the existing Landscape and Lighting District No. 1 – Greenhorn Creek. In the event that District property owners do not support the new formation, the existing Lighting and Landscape District No. 1 – Greenhorn Creek will remain active.

DISCUSSION
On May 17, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 22-22 declaring the Council’s intention to form Landscaping & Lighting District No. 2 – Greenhorn Creek to replace the existing Landscaping & Lighting District No. 1 – Greenhorn Creek and ordered the mailing of the assessment ballots. However, during the public input portion, several members of the public identified several parcels related to the golf course operations where the assessment methodology failed to capture the full use and benefit to those properties. The assessment engineer, SCI Consulting Group, conducted additional analysis on these parcels, which resulted in the refinement of the assessment methodology. As a result, City Staff is recommending readoption of the Resolution and Revised Preliminary Engineer’s Report by the City Council.

The modifications to the Engineer’s Report are listed below:
• Recalculation of the assessment methodology for Vacant/Undeveloped Properties reducing the SFE factor from

0.30 SFE to 0.15 SFE
• Recalculation of the Assessment Methodology for parcels 058-047-012-000 and 058-046-007-000 to capture the additional benefit related to the additional golf course operations associated with these parcels.

The Resolution of Intention (Attachment 1) and the Engineer’s Report (Attachment 2) for the Landscaping & Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek describe the area to be assessed, identify the work to be undertaken within the District, identify the Improvements to be constructed and maintained, establish the levy to be assessed, and set the date and time for the Public Hearing as August 2, 2022, at 6:00p.m.

If this resolution is approved, a property owner ballot procedure will be conducted for the Landscaping & Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek.

Engineer's Report and Assessment Rates
The draft Engineer's Report for the proposed FY 2022-23 Landscaping & Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek (Report), which is prepared pursuant to provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 of Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, includes authority for the Report, estimated costs of operation and maintenance, a diagram for the District and the assessments.

As provided in Attachment 2, the Report is now complete and filed with the City for approval and estimates the annualized cost to perform the required services to be $344,076 in FY 2022-23 dollars. This results in a proposed assessment rate of $650.00 per single-family equivalent (SFE).

Below is a summary of the main aspects in the Report:
• A description of the Improvements to be funded with assessment proceeds, services, and incidental costs; and • An estimate of the annual cost of such Improvements; and • A description of the assessable parcels of land within the District and proposed to be subject to the assessment; and
• A description of the proportionate special and general benefits conferred on property by the proposed assessment; and
• A description of the boundaries of the proposed Assessment District; and • A specification of the amount to be assessed upon various types of assessable land to fund the cost of the Improvements; and
• The proposed method and formula of assessing the costs and expenses of the Improvements to the properties which will specially benefit from the Improvements.
• Annual Assessment Calculation: The assessment is proposed to be subject to an adjustment tied to the Consumer Price Index-U for the Northern California (San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward) Consumer Price Index-All Urban Consumers (the “CPI”) as of December of each succeeding year (the "CPI"). The maximum authorized assessment rate is equal to the maximum assessment rate in the first fiscal year the assessment was levied adjusted annually by the change in CPI.

Procedure
The process of increasing the assessment levels for a district or formation of a new district is governed by Proposition 218 and requires a ballot proceeding where the property owners would need to approve the increase. The procedure is laid out in Division 15, Part 2 of the California Streets and Highways Code as well as Section 53750 - 53754 of the Government Code. It requires three steps:

1. Adopt a resolution to initiate the proceedings and direct preparation of the Engineer's Report (completed on March 15, 2022);

2. Adopt a resolution approving an Engineer's Report (which establishes assessment rates) and setting the date for a public hearing (this Report's recommendation); and

3. Conduct the public hearing (currently scheduled for August 2, 2022) at which time ballots will be tabulated and the outcome of the balloting proceeding will be known.

The ballots, along with a formal notice, will be mailed to each property owner on June 15, 2022, at least 45 days prior to the public hearing pursuant to law. The ballots can be returned any time up to the close of the hearing. In accordance with the statutes, these proceedings are voted on by property owners (instead of registered voters). In addition, votes are weighted by the amount of the proposed assessment.

Community Outreach Efforts
In addition to the required procedures above, Staff has conducted extensive outreach efforts to inform affected property owners of the issues and proposed actions and to listen to their feedback. Since August 25, 2021, the following outreach efforts have been implemented.
• Webpage: Two webpages were developed and deployed to inform the community on the District's history, timeline, and formation processes and offer specialized maps and graphics. • Postcards: Three Postcards were mailed out to all Greenhorn Creek property owners announcing the community meetings and explaining how to receive email updates.
• Community Meetings: The community was able to discuss and learn about the Greenhorn Creek LLD through nine (10) virtual community meetings held between August 25, 2021 – April 27, 2022. The recordings of community meetings have been shared on the District webpage (GreenhornCreekLLD.com). In addition, starting in October 2022, in-person meetings were held the following afternoon after each virtual meeting at the Shady Oaks Room. Lastly, a community-wide meeting is scheduled for May 31, 2022. • Community Site Walks: Three (3) community site walks were organized within the District to educate community members about the Historical Cultural Resources that the District maintains. • Email Campaign: An email campaign was created to distribute information to the community members who have signed up. In total, 190 of community members have signed up. • Survey: To gather information and feedback from the Greenhorn Creek community, a survey was developed and added to the District webpage.
• Resident Volunteer Groups: Two volunteer resident groups have formed during this outreach process. The first is the LLD Ambassadors who are working to spread the word to other community members. This group prepared a list of Frequently Asked Questions to share with other members. That FAQ is now posted on the District’s webpage. The second group is a Historical Conservation Team. The mission of this group is to educate the community about the historical resources in their neighborhood and restore the Protected Cultural Resource areas. This volunteer group is currently undertaking restoration work of the split rail fencing at the Selkirk Chimney site and recreation of the informational signs along the area’s two walking trails. Their volunteer effort has offset a substantial amount of deferred maintenance reducing the fiscal impact to the rest of the community.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The cost of the assessment formation and engineering for the Greenhorn Creek Landscaping and Lighting District is $45,500. The project will be funded with Landscaping & Lighting District funds budgeted for this purpose.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 2022-25

2. Landscape and Lighting District No. 2 – Greenhorn Creek Engineer’s Report RESOLUTION NO. 22-25

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANGELS CAMP CITY COUNCIL

DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO FORM LANDSCAPING AND
LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 2 GREENHORN CREEK AND LEVY
ASSESSMENTS, PRELIMINARILY APPROVING THE ENGINEER’S

REPORT, PROVIDING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND
ORDERING THE MAILING OF THE ASSESSMENT BALLOTs
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 22-11, approved on March 15, 2022, the City Council ordered the initiation of proceedings for the formation of Landscape and Lighting District No. 2 – Greenhorn Creek pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (commencing with § 22500 thereof) (“Act”); and
WHEREAS, Proposition 218 was adopted on November 6, 1996, adding Articles XIIIC and XIIID to the California Constitution, which impose certain procedural and substantive requirements relating to assessments (as defined).

WHEREAS, the Landscape and Lighting District No. 2 – Greenhorn Creek is intended to replace the Landscape and Lighting District No. 1 – Greenhorn Creek; and WHEREAS, the Landscape and Lighting District No. 1 – Greenhorn Creek will be replaced only if there is not majority protest against the proposed Landscape and Lighting District No. 2 – Greenhorn Creek; and
WHEREAS, an Engineer’s Report (“Report”) has been prepared by SCI Consulting Group, registered, professional engineers (“Assessment Engineer”), and submitted to the City Council, in which an assessment is proposed to fund the cost of the installation, maintenance and servicing of improvements within the District boundaries as described in Section 3 below. The proposed landscaping maintenance assessment shall be described as “Landscape and Lighting District No. 2 – Greenhorn Creek” of the City of Angels Camp (hereinafter the “Assessment District”).

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANGELS CAMP AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1: The above Recitals are in all respects true and correct.

SECTION 2: Reference to Initiation. In accordance with direction from the City Council, SCI Consulting Group, (“Engineer of Work”), prepared an Engineer’s Report (“Report”) pursuant to the Act and Article XIIID of the California Constitution. The Report has been prepared, filed with the City Clerk, reviewed, and duly considered by the City Council and is hereby deemed sufficient and preliminarily approved. The Report shall stand as the Engineer’s Report for all subsequent proceedings under and pursuant to this Resolution.

SECTION 3: Description of the Improvements: The purpose of the Assessment District shall be for the installation, maintenance, and servicing of improvements. Within the District, the existing and proposed improvements (“Improvements”) are generally described as the installation, maintenance and servicing of public and private areas and facilities, including but not limited to, landscaping, sprinkler systems, landscape corridors, ground cover, shrubs and trees, street frontages, drainage systems, lighting, fencing, entry monuments, graffiti removal and repainting, and labor, materials, supplies, utilities and equipment, as applicable, for property owned and/or maintained by the City.

Installation means the construction of landscape improvements, including, but not limited to, land preparation, such as grading, leveling, cutting and filling, sod, landscaping, irrigation systems, sidewalks and drainage, and lights. Maintenance means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of said improvements, including (a) repair, removal, or replacement of all or part of any improvement; (b) providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury; (c) the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste; and (d) the cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti. Servicing means the furnishing of (a) electric current or energy, gas, or other illuminating agent for any public lighting facilities or for the lighting or operation of any other improvements, and (b) water for the irrigation of any landscaping, the operation of any fountains, or the maintenance of any other improvements.

SECTION 4: Reference to Engineer’s Report: The Report is hereby incorporated by reference. Reference is hereby made to the Report for a full and detailed description of the Improvements, the boundaries of the Assessment District and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the Assessment District.

Reference is also hereby made to the Report for an estimate of the costs of the Improvements proposed to be financed from the proceeds of the proposed assessment.

SECTION 5: Report of the Assessment Engineer: The Report is available for public review at the City of Angels Camp City Hall, located at 200 Monte Verda St. Suite B, Angels Camp, CA 95222 The Engineer’s Report includes:

A. A description of the Improvements to be funded with assessment proceeds, services, and incidental costs; and
B. An estimate of the annual cost of such Improvements; and C. A description of the assessable parcels of land within the District and proposed to be subject to the assessment; and
D. A description of the proportionate special and general benefits conferred on property by the proposed assessment; and
E. A description of the boundaries of the proposed Assessment District; and F. A specification of the amount to be assessed upon various types of assessable land to fund the cost of the Improvements; and
G. The proposed method and formula of assessing the costs and expenses of the Improvements to the properties which will specially benefit from the Improvements.

SECTION 6: Description of Assessment District: The Assessment District consists of the lots and parcels shown on the boundary map of the Assessment District on file with the City Clerk, and reference is hereby made to such map for further particulars.

SECTION 7: Proposed Assessment Rate: It is the intention of this City Council to levy and collect assessments within the Assessment District. The estimated Fiscal Year 2022- 23 cost of providing the Improvements is $344,076. Said estimated cost results in a proposed Single-Family Equivalent (“SFE”) assessment rate of SIX HUNDRED AND FIFTY DOLLARS ($650.00) for fiscal year 2022-23. It is the further intention of the City to have the assessment collected on the tax roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separately from, its general taxes.

SECTION 8: Public Hearing: notice is hereby given that the public hearing on the proposed assessment shall be held before the City Council of the City of Angels Camp in the Angels Fire House, located at 1404 Vallecito Road, Angels Camp, CA on Tuesday, August 2, 2022 at the hour of 6:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, for the purpose of this city council’s determination of whether the public interest, convenience and necessity require the improvements and this city council’s final action upon the report and the assessments therein. All interested persons shall be afforded the opportunity to hear and be heard. Any interested person may file a written protest with the City Clerk, or, having previously filed a protest, may file a written withdrawal of that protest, prior to the conclusion of the public input portion of the public hearing. A written protest shall state all grounds of objection. A protest by a property owner shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the signer thereof. The City Council shall consider all oral statements and all written protests made or filed by any interested person.

SECTION 9: Notice and Ballot: The City Clerk hereby is authorized and directed to cause Notice of the hearing ordered under Section 8 hereof to be given in accordance with law by United States Mail, and such Notice shall be deemed to have been given when so deposited in the United States Mail. The envelope or cover of the mailing shall include the name of the City. The mailed Notice shall be given to all property owners of assessable parcels within the Assessment District by such mailing by name to those persons whose names and addresses appear on the last equalized secured property tax assessment roll of Calaveras County, or in the case of any public entity, the representative of such public entity at the address thereof known to the City Clerk. The Notice shall include, but not be limited to, the total amount of assessment proposed to be levied in the Assessment District for fiscal year 2022-23, the assessment proposed for the owner’s particular parcel(s) and the duration thereof and the reason for the assessment. Each Notice shall also contain the proposed assessment and the basis upon which the amount of the assessment was calculated. Each Notice shall also contain an assessment ballot, a summary of the procedures applicable to the completion, return and tabulation of assessment ballots, the date, time, and location of the public hearing and a statement that the existence of a majority protest will result in the assessment not being imposed. The Notice herein provided shall be mailed not less than forty-five (45) days before the date of the public hearing.

SECTION 10: Additional Information: To obtain additional information about the proposed assessments, the Assessment District, or the proposed Improvements contact:

Rebecca Neilon, City Engineer, telephone number (916) 822-3953. The Engineer’s Report and other written material about the Assessment District may also be reviewed at the Office of the City Clerk during regular business hours.

SECTION 11: Annual Assessments: The assessments are proposed to be levied annually.

If the proposed assessments are approved and confirmed by the City Council, the assessments will increase in future years by an amount up to the change in the Northern California (San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward) Consumer Price Index-All Urban Consumers (the “CPI”) without a further vote or balloting process. In each subsequent year in which the assessments will be levied, an updated Engineer’s Report, including a proposed budget and assessment rate, shall be prepared. The updated Engineer’s Report shall be considered by the City Council at a noticed public hearing. The updated Engineer’s Report shall serve as the basis for the continuation of the assessments PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Angels, State of California this 7th day of June 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
___________________
Alvin Broglio,Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Rose Beristianos, City Clerk
Page
Fiscal Year 2022-23 ENGINEER’S REPORT
City of Angels Camp
Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District No. 2
Greenhorn Creek
Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972,
Government Code and Article XIIID of the California
Constitution
June 2022
Preliminary Report
City of Angels Camp
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23
Page i
City of Angels
City Council
Alvin Broglio, Mayor
Jennifer Davis-Herndon, Vice Mayor
Gretel Tiscornia Council Member
Isabel Moncada, Council Member
Caroline Schirato, Council Member
City Staff
Rebecca Callen, City Administrator
Rebecca Neilon, City Engineer
Chris O’Flinn, Public Works Director
City Attorney
Douglas L. White
Engineer of Work
John Bliss, P.E., SCI Consulting Group
City of Angels Camp
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23
Page ii
Table of Contents
Introduction............................................................................................................... 1 History and Overview................................................................................................................1 Engineer’s Report and Continuation of Assessments...............................................................2 Legislative Analysis....................................................................................................................2 Plans & Specifications................................................................................................. 5 Maintenance and Improvements..............................................................................................6 Fiscal Year 2022-23 Estimate of Cost and Budget ...................................................... 15 Budget for Fiscal Year 2022-23................................................................................................15 Method of Assessment Apportionment.................................................................... 17 Method of Apportionment......................................................................................................17 Discussion of Benefit...............................................................................................................17 Special Benefit.........................................................................................................................19 General Versus Special Benefit................................................................................................20 Quantification of General Benefit Contribution from Other Sources.....................................24 Zones of Benefit ......................................................................................................................25 Method of Assessment............................................................................................................26 Assessment Apportionment....................................................................................................27 Annual Cost Indexing...............................................................................................................31 Duration of Assessment ..........................................................................................................32 Appeals of Assessments Levied to Property ...........................................................................32 Assessment Funds Must Be Expended within the District......................................................32 Oversight, Annual Review, and Accountability .......................................................................32 Citizens’ Oversight Committee................................................................................................33 Assessment.............................................................................................................. 34 Assessment Diagram ................................................................................................ 36 Assessment Roll, FY 2022-23..................................................................................... 38 City of Angels Camp
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23
Page iii
List of Tables
Table 1 – Formal Landscaping Planter............................................................................................. 7 Table 2 – Formal Landscaping Lawn ................................................................................................ 8 Table 3 – Weed Control ................................................................................................................... 8 Table 4 – Protected Cultural Resource Areas.................................................................................. 9 Table 5 – Trail Maintenance ............................................................................................................ 9 Table 6 – Trail Bridge Maintenance ................................................................................................. 9 Table 7 – Defensible Space Clearing (Annual) ............................................................................... 10 Table 8 – Wetland Exclusionary Fencing and Signage ................................................................... 11 Table 9 – FY 2022-23 Estimate of Costs......................................................................................... 15 Table 10 – Residential Property Types........................................................................................... 28 Table 11 – Commercial/Industrial Benefit Assessment Factors.................................................... 29 Table 12 – Budget Summary .......................................................................................................... 34 City of Angels Camp
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23
Page iv
List of Figures
Figure 1 – 404 Permit Maintenance and Improvements............................................................... 12 Figure 2 – Non-Permit Maintenance and Improvements.............................................................. 13 Figure 3 – Annual Defensible Space Clearing................................................................................. 14

Page 1 ends

Introduction
History and Overview
The Greenhorn Creek Landscape and Lighting District has two purposes: (1) to fund the ongoing protection and preservation of on-site environmental resources and (2) to fund maintenance of streetlights, landscaping, curb-gutter-and-sidewalk, entry monument signs, and related community use infrastructure within the Greenhorn Creek development.

The City of Angels Camp Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1 – Greenhorn Creek was formed by a majority vote of the City of Angels (”City”) City Council on June 6, 1995. As a result of the subsequent passage of Proposition 218 in 1996, the assessment rate for the existing assessment District (No.1) cannot be increased beyond the previously approved amount of $300.00 per parcel (resulting from the fact that a cost-of-living adjustment mechanism was not explicitly included in the original formation documents.) As costs have continued to increase, this assessment amount no longer generates sufficient revenue to fund Greenhorn Creek’s improvements and services.

Without additional resources and funding, service levels will continue to deteriorate.

As a result, the Angels Camp City Council has directed that a new assessment be proposed and voted on by property owners in accordance with Proposition 218 (Article XIIIC and D or the California Constitution). The Council’s intent is to replace the existing Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1 – Greenhorn Creek with a new Landscaping and Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek (“District”) within the existing boundary and including the same improvements and services. If approved, the existing District No. 1 will be dissolved. Further, the proposed Landscaping and Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek is engineered to generate sufficient funding, and include an optional, annual cost-of-living adjustment mechanism to ensure longterm fiscal sustainability of the District.

This Engineer’s Report ("Report") has been prepared to establish the budget for the Improvements (as described below) that will be funded by the proposed assessments and other revenue and to determine the general and special benefits received from the Improvements by property within the District and the method of assessment apportionment to lots and parcels.

This Report and the assessments have been made pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the "Act") and Article XIIID of the California Constitution (the “Article”).
(Note: Although the District funds maintenance and services of landscaping, lighting, and related improvements within the Greenhorn Creek development, it does not fund the maintenance or operations of the adjacent Greenhorn Creek golf course, which is maintained and funded by a separate entity using separate funding.)
City of Angels Camp
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 2 ends

Engineer’s Report and Continuation of Assessments
As required by the Act, this Report includes plans and specifications, a diagram or map of the District, the benefits received by property from the Improvements within the District, and the method of assessment apportionment to lots and parcels within the District.

If the Council approves this Engineer’s Report and the proposed Assessments by resolution, a ballot and notice will be mailed to each property owner as identified in the most recent equalized tax roll prepared by the Calaveras County Assessor’s office. The resolution preliminarily approving the Engineer’s Report and mailed notice will include the date for a public hearing at which time all ballots must be received to be counted in accordance with Government Code Section 53753.

The notice and ballots must be mailed at least 45 days prior to the public hearing.

At the appointed time and place, a public hearing is held to allow public testimony about the proposed Assessments. At this hearing, the Council will hear public testimony and tabulate all ballots turned in before the close of the public comment period of the public hearing. If it is determined that the assessment ballots submitted in opposition to the proposed Assessments do not exceed the assessment ballots submitted in favor of the Assessments (each ballot is weighted by the proportional financial obligation of the property for which the ballot is submitted) the Council may take action to approve the levying of Assessments for Fiscal Year 2022-23. If so confirmed and approved, the Assessments would be submitted to the Calaveras County Auditor/Controller for inclusion on the property tax rolls for fiscal year 2022-23.

Legislative Analysis
Proposition 218
This assessment is formed consistent with Proposition 218, The Right to Vote on Taxes Act, which was approved by the voters of California on November 6, 1996, and is now Article XIIIC and XIIID of the California Constitution. Proposition 218 provides for benefit assessments to be levied to fund the cost of providing services, improvements, as well as maintenance and operation expenses to a public improvement which specially benefits the assessed property.

Proposition 218 describes several important requirements, including a property-owner balloting, for the formation and continuation of assessments. These requirements are satisfied by the process used to establish this assessment.

City of Angels Camp
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 3 ends

Silicon Valley Taxpayers Association, Inc. v Santa Clara County Open Space Authority (2008) 44 Cal. 4th 431
In July of 2008, the California Supreme Court issued its ruling on the Silicon Valley Taxpayers Association, Inc. v. Santa Clara County Open Space Authority (“SVTA”). This ruling is significant in that the Court clarified how Proposition 218 made changes to the determination of special benefit. The Court also found that:
 Benefit assessments are for special, not general, benefit  The services and/or improvements funded by assessments must be clearly defined  Special benefits are directly received by and provide a direct advantage to property in the Assessment District
 The assessment paid by property should be proportional to the special benefits it receives from the Improvements
Dahms v. Downtown Pomona Property (2009) 174 Cal. App. 4th 708 In Dahms v. Downtown Pomona Property (“Dahms”) the Court upheld an assessment that was 100% special benefit (i.e. 0% general benefit) on the rationale that the services and improvements funded by the assessments were directly provided to property in the assessment district. The Court also upheld discounts and exemptions from the assessment for certain properties.

Bonander v. Town of Tiburon (2009) 180 Cal. App. 4th 103 Bonander v. Town of Tiburon (“Bonander”), the 1st District Court of Appeal overturned a benefit assessment approved by property owners to pay for placing overhead utility lines underground in an area of the Town of Tiburon. The Court invalidated the assessments primarily on the grounds that the assessments had been apportioned to assessed property based on the costs within subareas of the assessment district instead of the overall cost of the improvements and the overall proportional special benefits.

Beutz v. County of Riverside (2010) 184 Cal. App. 4th 1516 Steven Beutz v. County of Riverside (“Beutz”) the Court overturned an assessment for park maintenance in Wildomar, California, primarily because the general benefits associated with improvements and services were not explicitly calculated, quantified, and separated from the special benefits.

City of Angels Camp
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 4 ends

Golden Hill Neighborhood Association v. City of San Diego (2011) 199 Cal. App. 4th 416
On September 22, 2011, the San Diego Court of Appeal issued a decision on the Golden Hill Neighborhood Association v. City of San Diego appeal. This decision overturned an assessment for street and landscaping maintenance in the Greater Golden Hill neighborhood of San Diego, California. The court described two primary reasons for its decision. First, like in Beutz, the court found the general benefits associated with services were not explicitly calculated, quantified, and separated from the special benefits. Second, the court found that the City had failed to record the basis for the assessment on its own parcels.

Compliance with Current Law
This Engineer’s Report is consistent with the SVTA decision and with the requirements of Article XIIIC and XIIID of the California Constitution because the Improvements to be funded are clearly defined; the benefiting property in the District enjoys close and unique proximity, access and views to the Improvements; the Improvements serve as an extension of usable land area for benefiting properties in the District and such special benefits provide a direct advantage to property in the District that is not enjoyed by the public at large or other property.

This Engineer’s Report is consistent with Beutz, Dahms and Greater Golden Hill because the Improvements will directly benefit property in the District and the general benefits have been explicitly calculated and quantified and excluded from the Assessments. The Engineer’s Report is consistent with Bonander because the Assessments have been apportioned based on the overall cost of the Improvements and Services proportional special benefit to each property, rather than the proportional cost to the District to provide the Improvements to specific properties.

City of Angels Camp
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 5 ends

Plans & Specifications
The District maintains landscaping and other improvements in locations within the District’s boundaries. The work and Improvements to be undertaken by the City of Angels Landscaping and Lighting District No. 2 – Greenhorn Creek, and the cost thereof paid from the levy of the annual Assessment provide special benefit to Assessor Parcels within the District as defined in the Method of Assessment herein. In addition to the definitions provided by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, (the “Act”) the work and Improvements are generally described as follows:

The installation, maintenance, and servicing of public improvements and facilities, may include, but are not limited to, landscaping, sprinkler systems, park grounds, park facilities, playground equipment, landscape corridors, sidewalks, curbs and gutters, storm drainage systems, public lighting facilities, fencing, entry monuments, signage, frontage and retention walls, other landscaping facilities, and related labor, materials, supplies, utilities, equipment, and incidental expenses in and for the parks, landscape areas, detention basins and other public places owned or maintained by the District. (Collectively known as the “Improvements.”) As applied herein, “Installation” means the construction of Improvements, including, but not limited to, land preparation (such as grading, leveling, cutting, and filling), sod, landscaping, irrigation systems, sidewalks, walkways and drainage, lights, playground equipment, play courts, playing fields, recreational facilities, and public restrooms. “Maintenance” means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of any improvement, including repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement; providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste, and the cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti.

Maintenance activities within the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE) 404 permit protected areas must follow the permit requirements. Deviation from the permit requirements requires written approval from the USACOE.
“Servicing” means the furnishing of electric current, or energy, gas or other illuminating agent for any public lighting facilities or for the lighting or operation of any other improvements, or water for the irrigation of any landscaping, the operation of any fountains, or the maintenance of any other improvements.

City of Angels Camp
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 6 ends

Incidental expenses include all of the following: (a) The costs of preparation of the report, including plans, specifications, estimates, diagram, and assessment; (b) the costs of printing, advertising, and the giving of published, posted, and mailed notices; (c) compensation payable to the County for collection of assessments; (d) compensation of any engineer or attorney employed to render services in proceedings pursuant to this part; (e) any other expenses incidental to the construction, installation, or maintenance and servicing of the Improvements; (f) any expenses incidental to the issuance of bonds or notes pursuant to Streets & Highways Code Section 22662.5; and (g) costs associated with any elections held for the approval of a new or increased assessment (Streets & Highways Code §22526).

The assessment proceeds will be exclusively used for Improvements within the District plus incidental expenses. The Improvements and area to be maintained by the District are described as follows:

Maintenance and Improvements
Sidewalk and Drainage Facilities
Includes maintenance service for roadway drainage facilities, sidewalks, and reserves for future repairs. Culvert and drainage inlets that are located on private property, including the golf course, will not be maintained by the District.

Maintained infrastructure includes storm water drainage inlets, sidewalk, curb, and gutter (both rolled and standard), and stormwater conveyance pipes along District streets.

Lighting and Signage
The street lighting Improvements, which will be maintained by the District, consist of 49 streetlights, six pedestal lights, and all required appurtenances. This includes cost of power plus maintenance service for streetlight poles, lamps, glassware, plus cost of power for miscellaneous monument signs.

The signage which will be maintained by the District includes the three (3) entry monument signs.

The safety and street signs within the District will be maintained by the City. The golf course will maintain Golf Course wayfinding signs.

Formal Landscape Areas
The formally landscaped areas (planter and lawn areas) require turf to be mowed, edged, and kept free of debris. Irrigation control and repair, pruning, fertilizing, weed control, and trash pickup are also required. Golf course turf adjacent to roads will be maintained by the golf course.

Below is a list of the formal landscaped areas within the District:

City of Angels Camp
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 7 ends

Table 1 – Formal Landscaping Planter
Area Area (SQFT) Location
LAND-1 744 GHC Rd Median by Gateway Park
LAND-2 4,243 GHC Rd & Selkirk Entrance by Wetland E-WET-6 LAND-3 880 Selkirk Median at Entrance
LAND-4 7,460 Selkirk Planter by WorldMark
LAND-5 3,204 Selkirk Planter by 10th Hole
LAND-6 5,638 Selkirk Planter by 2nd Hole and 18th Tee
LAND-7 612 Lot 3 - Selkirk
LAND-8 232 Lot 8 - Selkirk
LAND-9 6,252 Smith Flat between Pointe Dr and Hole #11, Tee #17 LAND-10 621 Lot 202 Smith Flat
LAND-11 1,521 Olivia Place
LAND-12 2,030 Cornelia Place - Lot 209
LAND-13 2,755 Lot 192 and WILD-2e - Smith Flat
LAND-14 338 Lot 190 Smith Flat
LAND-15 135 Lot 188 Smith Flat & Raggio Ct
LAND-16 343 Lot 179 Smith Flat
LAND-17 623 Lot 178 Smith Flat
LAND-18 1,102 Lightner Place
LAND-19 203 Lot 174 Lighter PL and Smith Flat
LAND-20 716 Alawa Place
LAND-21 1,103 Sasa Place
LAND-22 789 Lots174 & 173 Smith Flat
LAND-23 543 Lot 172 Smith Flat
LAND-24 535 Lot 171 Smith Flat
LAND-25 344 Lot 170 Smith Flat
LAND-26 144 Lot 169 Smith Flat
LAND-27 210 Lot 169 & 168 Smith Flat
LAND-28 859 Lot 168 & 167 Smith Flat
LAND-29 148 Lot 167 Smith Flat
LAND-30 117 Lot 166 Smith Flat
LAND-31 328 Lot 165 Smith Flat
LAND-32 71 Lot 164 Smith Flat
LAND-33 1,141 Lot 164 Smith Flat
LAND-34 1,128 Lot 164 Smith Flat
LAND-35 717 Across from Lot 133 Smith Flat
LAND-36 13,887 Behind Sidewalk Smith Flat SE Corner of Property LAND-37 371 Across from Lot 132 Smith Flat
LAND-38 501 Across from Lot 131 Smith Flat
LAND-39 1,135 Across from Lot 130 and Open Space Smith Flat LAND-40 862 Across from Lot 128 and 127 Smith Flat
LAND-41 988 Across from Lot 126 Smith Flat
City of Angels Camp
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 8 ends

LAND-42 560 At end of Smith Flat at GHC Dr.

LAND-43 1,334 McCauley Entrance North Shoulder
LAND-44 817 McCauley Entrance Median
LAND-45 7,357 McCauley Entrance South Shoulder & by Wetland E-Wet-1 LAND-46 494 McCauley & Selkirk NW Curb
LAND-47 126 Lot 80 Selkirk at Chimney Hill
LAND-48 342 Lot 67 Selkirk at Chimney Hill
LAND-49 304 Lot 71 Selkirk at Springhouse Ct.

LAND-50 1,810 GHC Rd. Median between Gateway Park and Selkirk Entrance LAND-51 133 Lot 189 Smith Flat
LAND-52 643 Smith Flat & GHC Rd South Side of Intersection Table 2 – Formal Landscaping Lawn
Area Area (SQFT) Location
LAWN-1 8,671 Triangle area: Angel Oak/Live Oak/Acorn
LAWN-2 3,570 GHC Rd Shoulder past triangle area
LAWN-3 1,781 Selkirk Entrance East of Wetland Site 6
LAWN-4 576 Smith Flat at Selkirk Entrance south side of Wetland S-Wet-6 LAWN-5 21,951 GHC Rd - Median Selkirk to McCauley
LAWN-6 16,501 GHC Rd - Median McCauley South
LAWN-7 15,419 Lawn in front of WorldMark
Table 3 – Weed Control
Area Area (SQFT) Location
WEED-1 2,020 GHC Rd shoulder west of Selkirk Entrance
WEED-2 2,456 Smith Flat South of Wetland E-WET-6
WEED-3 13,239 GHC Rd shoulder between Selkirk and McCauley WEED-4 295 Smith Flat at Lot N, Just west of Albasio Ct WEED-5 1,298 Smith Flat North side of PCR-4
WEED-6 11,158 GHC RD Shoulder South of McCauley
WEED-7 765 Blair Mine Rd. South side of Wildlife Corridor WILD-1c WEED-8 665 Blair Mine Rd. North side of Wildlife Corridor WILD-1d WEED-9 843 Smith Flat South of Wildlife Corridor WILD-1a by WEED-10 257 Selkirk South side of Wildlife Corridor WILD-2a WEED-11 458 Selkirk North side of Wildlife Corridor WILD-2c WEED-12 607 Selkirk East side of Wildlife Corridor WILD-2c WEED-13 221 Selkirk West side of Wildlife Corridor WILD-2b WEED-14 605 Smith Flat North side of Wildlife Corridor WILD-1b WEED-15 686 Smith Flat South side of Wildlife Corridor WILD-1c City of Angels Camp
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 9 ends

Protected Cultural Resource Area (PCR)
The District is responsible for maintaining and protecting the five (5) Protected Cultural Resource areas (PCR's) listed in Table 4 below. This includes fence and sign maintenance, scheduled inspections by LLD, Miwok, and Qualified Archeologist as specified in the Historic Properties Treatment Plan of February 1999, annual informational brochures for residents and golfers, and vegetation management as directed by the City of Angels Fire Marshall. Walking Trails through the PCR areas are to be kept weed-free. (Weed whack only, no spraying allowed) Table 4 – Protected Cultural Resource Areas
Area Location
PCR #1 Near tee for hole #16
PCR #2 Chimney Site
PCR #3 Albasio Court
PCR #4 Raggio Court
PCR #5 South of Raggio Court
Protected Wildlife Corridor
The District is responsible for maintaining and protecting the two (2) Protected Wildlife Corridors within the District. This includes maintenance of the trails, trail bridges, trail signage, and annual defensible space clearing listed in the tables below.

Per the USACOE Permit the Protected Wildlife Corridor areas are to be left to develop naturally with no human intervention. The permit allows defensible space clearing when directed by the City Fire Marshal for public safety. See Figure 3 for an exhibit of current defensible space areas.

This permit may be modified as empty lots develop near the Wildlife Corridors. Minimally invasive walking trails through the Wildlife Corridor identified as WILD-2e are permitted and will be maintained by the District.

Table 5 – Trail Maintenance
Area Location
WILD-2e Between Albasio and Raggio (10' corridor x 2,200 ft) Table 6 – Trail Bridge Maintenance
Area Location
WILD-2e East and West Pedestrian Bridges between Albasio and Raggio City of Angels Camp
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 10 ends

Table 7 – Defensible Space Clearing (Annual)
Area Area (acre) Location
A-0 0.00 Open Space (near Selkirk Entrance)
A-1 1.06 Behind Selkirk and Point Drive (WILD-1b)
A-2 0.51 Catalpa and Smith Flat - North Side (WILD-1b)
A-3 0.39 Catalpa and Smith Flat - South Side (WILD-1c)
A-4 0.11 North of the Blair Mine/Smith Flat intersection (WILD-1c) A-5 0.60 Down slope from Corral Loop (WILD-1d)
A-6 0.24 Selkirk East of Grinding Rock (WILD-2b)
A-7 1.86 Selkirk, Greenstone Way, & Grinding Rock Rd. (WILD-2c) A-8 0.15 End of Springhouse (WILD-2d)
A-9 0.84 North and West of PCR-4, south of Smith Flat (WILD-2e) A-10 1.15 Southeast side of PCR-4, along the sewer maint. rd (WILD-2e) A-11 0.43 East of Albassio, south of PCR-3 (WILD-2e)
Wetlands
The Greenhorn Creek project impacted 4.41 acres of Waters of the United States, triggering the need for a Section 404 Permit under the Clean Water Act. This permit is issued, monitored, and enforced by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The project removed 4.41 acres of wetlands and replaced them with 7.67 acres of compensation wetland.

There are three types of wetlands throughout the development:
 Seasonal Wetland: wetlands scattered along drainages below springs and along shorelines
 Emergent Wetland: The emergent zone stretches from the high-water mark to 3 feet below the high-water mark. Notice the edges of the large pond are Emergent Wetlands, but the center of the pond is not classified as wetland. However, the entire pond is classified as Waters of the United States and is protected by several regulatory agencies.  Stream: waterways that exhibit an incised channel
As a requirement of the 404 Permit, the District is required to maintain the exclusionary fencing and informational signage listed in Table 8 below. The District is also required to monitor the water level and notify the golf course when the water level falls below the required minimal level.

Wetland 4b (E-WET 4b) located by the 5th Tee box is unsuccessful due to excessive nutrient loading from fertilizer runoff and insufficient depth. To mitigate these issues, the District treats this pond with beneficial bacteria monthly during the dry season. Coordination with the ACOE is ongoing to find a solution for wetland 4b.

City of Angels Camp
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 11 ends

Table 8 – Wetland Exclusionary Fencing and Signage
Area Location
E-WET 1 McCauley Entrance Wetland
E-WET 4a Large Pond (By 5th, 6th, and 7th greens)
E-WET 4b Small Pond (by 5th Tee Box)
E-WET 6 Selkirk Entrance Wetland
Replacements
Dedicated funding, often referred to as “reserves,” will be used to augment for replacement costs as needed. Reserves are needed in the event improvements need to be replaced due to failure, damage, natural disaster etc.

Maps of the District with corresponding areas of maintenance are included on the following pages.

City of Angels Camp
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 12 ends

Figure 1 – 404 Permit Maintenance and Improvements
City of Angels Camp
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 13 ends

Figure 2 – Non-Permit Maintenance and Improvements
City of Angels Camp
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 14 ends

Figure 3 – Annual Defensible Space Clearing
City of Angels Camp
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 15 ends

Fiscal Year 2022-23 Estimate of Cost and Budget
Budget for Fiscal Year 2022-23
The 1972 Act provides that the total costs for providing the maintenance and servicing of the District Improvements and facilities can be recovered in the assessment spread including incidental expenses. The latter can include engineering fees, legal fees, printing, mailing, postage, publishing, and all other costs identified with the District proceedings.

An estimate of District costs for fiscal year 2022-23 for the maintenance and servicing of the Improvements is provided below.

Table 9 – FY 2022-23 Estimate of Costs
City of Angels Camp
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 16 ends

Expenditure Item Amount
LLD Management $ 41,070
Repayment of Wetland Loan 17,721
Repayment of Prop 218 Loan 10,200
Fencing Repair (annual) -
Defered Maintenance Fencing and Signs (PCR+Wetland) 27,432 Interpretive Signs (5 total) (15 Year) 160
Vegetation Management (annual) 12,760
Chimney Preservation (20 year) 1,000
Walking Trail Clearing / Maintenance (annual) 2,320
Informational Brochures Residents and Golfers (annual) 1,000 Trail Maintenance - between Albasio and Raggio 800
Trail Bridge Maintenance Annual (2 bridges) -
Trail Bridge Deck & Railing Replacement (15 years) 1,333 Wildlife Corridor Signs - 20 Year Replacement 392
Defensible Space Clearing (Annual) 12,510
Replace Exclusionary Fencing around Wetland (20 year) 4,750 Maintain Fencing Around Wetlands (annual) -
Informational Signage Around Wetlands (15 years) 273
Beneficial Bacteria for Small Pond (annual) 255
Bulb Replacement / Light Repair 5,700
Paint Streetlights (15 years) 1,333
Replace Streetlight poles (100 year) 3,327
Electrical Bill (annual) 3,912
Weed Control (annual costs) 3,681
Formal Landscaping Planter (annual Costs) 65,473
Formal Landscaping Lawn (W/O median and triangle) 35,415 Median High Intesity Landscaping 10,190
Median Conversion 48,427
Triangle Parcel Maint. (without conversion Project) 16,816 Sidewalks 3,885
Entry Monument Signs (total 3)
Convert to LED (One Time Cost) 1,500
Repair As needed/Replace Bulbs (annual) 4,500
Replace Entry Monument Signs (TOTAL 3) (40 year) 2,250
Pedestal Lights (Total 6)
Convert to LED (one time cost) 1,110
Repair As needed/Replace Bubls (annual) 1,830
Replace Pedestal Light Structure (40 years) 750
Estimated Expenditures $ 344,076
Budget Allocation to Parcels Amount
Total Assessment Budget $ 344,076
Total SFEs 529.35
Assessment per SFE 1 $ 650.00
Streetlights
Landscaping & Water
Hardscape
Miscellaneous
LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2

GREENHORN CREEK
Management, Legal, & Insurance
Protected Cultural Areas
Wildlife Corridor
Wetlands
City of Angels Camp
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 17 ends

Method of Assessment Apportionment
Method of Apportionment
This section of the Engineer's Report explains the benefits to be derived from the Improvements and the methodology used to apportion the total assessment to properties within the District.

The District consists of certain assessor parcels within the boundaries as defined by the Assessment Diagram referenced in this report and the parcels identified by the Assessor Parcel Numbers listed with the levy roll. The parcel list includes all privately and publicly owned parcels as shown. The method used for apportioning the assessment is based upon the proportional special benefits derived by the properties in the District over and above general benefits conferred on real property or to the public at large. Special benefit and the Assessments are calculated for each parcel in the District using the following process:

1. Identification of special benefit factors derived from the Improvements

2. Calculation and quantification of the general benefits

3. Determination of the relative special benefit within different areas within the Assessment District

4. Determination of the relative special benefit per property type

5. Apportionment of the costs to Assessment and calculation of the Assessment for each individual parcel based upon special benefit; location, property type, property size, property characteristics, improvements on property and other supporting attributes.

Discussion of Benefit
In summary, the Assessments can only be levied based on the special benefit to property. This special benefit is received by property over and above any general benefits. With reference to the requirements for assessments, Section 22573 of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 states:
"The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements."
Proposition 218, as codified in Article XIIID of the California Constitution, has confirmed that assessments must be based on the special benefit to property and that the value of the special benefits must exceed the cost of the assessment:
"No assessment shall be imposed on any parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel." City of Angels Camp
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 18 ends

The following benefit categories summarize the types of special benefit to residential and other lots and parcels resulting from the installation, maintenance, and servicing of the Improvements to be provided with the assessment proceeds. These categories of special benefit are derived from the statutes passed by the California Legislature and other studies which describe the types of special benefit received by property from maintenance and Improvements such as those within by the District. These types of special benefit are summarized as follows:

1. Proximity to improved landscaped, cultural and wildlife areas, and other public Improvements within the Assessment District.

2. Access to improved landscaped, cultural and wildlife areas, and other public Improvements within the Assessment District.

3. Improved views within the Assessment District.

4. Extension of a property’s outdoor areas and green spaces for properties within close proximity to the Improvements.

5. Improved nighttime visibility and safety from streetlights

6. Creation of individual lots for residential use that, in absence of the Assessments, would not have been created.

In this case, the recent SVTA v. SCCOSA decision provides enhanced clarity to the definitions of special benefits to properties from similar improvements in three distinct areas:
 Proximity
 Expanded or improved access
 Views
The SVTA v. SCCOSA decision also clarifies that a special benefit is a service or improvement that provides a direct advantage to a parcel and that indirect or derivative advantages resulting from the overall public benefits from a service or improvement are general benefits. The SVTA v.

SCCOSA decision also provides specific guidance that park improvements are a direct advantage and special benefit to property that is proximate to a park that is improved by an assessment:

The characterization of a benefit may depend on whether the parcel receives a direct advantage from the improvement (e.g. proximity to a park) or receives an indirect, derivative advantage resulting from the overall public benefits of the improvement (e.g. general enhancement of the district’s property values).

Proximity, improved access and views, in addition to the other special benefits listed above further strengthen the basis of these assessments.

City of Angels Camp
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 19 ends

Moreover, the Dahms decision further clarified that certain services and improvements funded by assessments, that are over and above what otherwise would be provided and that other property in general and the public do not share or receive are 100% special benefit. The assessment-funded services upheld by Dahms included streetscape maintenance and security services.

Special Benefit
SCI assessment engineers have identified the following special benefits:

Proximity and Access to Improved Landscaped, Cultural and Wildlife Areas, and Other Public Areas within the Assessment District
Only the specific properties within close proximity to the Improvements are included in the District. The District has been narrowly drawn to include the properties that receive special benefits from the Improvements. Therefore, property in the District enjoys unique and valuable proximity and access to the Improvements that the public at large and property outside the District do not share.

In absence of the Assessments, the Improvements would not be provided and the landscaped, cultural and wildlife areas in the District would be degraded due to insufficient funding for maintenance, upkeep, and repair. Therefore, the assessments provide Improvements that are over and above what otherwise would be provided. Improvements that are over and above what otherwise would be provided do not by themselves translate into special benefits but when combined with the unique proximity enjoyed by parcels in the District, they provide a direct advantage and special benefit to property in the District.

Since the parcels in the District are nearly the only parcels that enjoy close access to the Improvements, they directly benefit from the unique close access to improved landscaping areas that are provided by the Assessments. This is a direct advantage and special benefit to property in the District.

Improved Views within the Assessment District
The District, by maintaining permanent public improvements funded by the Assessments in the District, provides improved views to properties in the District. The properties in the District enjoy close and unique proximity, access and views of the specific Improvements funded in the District; therefore, the improved and protected views provided by the Assessments are another direct and tangible advantage that is uniquely conferred upon property in the District.

City of Angels Camp
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 20 ends

Extension of a Property’s Outdoor Areas and Green Spaces for Properties within Close Proximity to the Improvements
The landscaped, cultural and wildlife areas within the District provide additional outdoor areas that serve as an effective extension of the land area for proximate properties. The Improvements, therefore, provide an important, valuable, and desirable extension of usable land area for the direct advantage and special benefit of properties with good and close proximity to the Improvements.

Improved Nighttime Visibility and Safety from Streetlights Well maintained, effective street lighting provides special benefit to proximate parcels, within the range of the light, because it allows for safer and improved use of the property in the evenings and night. Street lighting also provides special benefit as it increases neighborhood safety and reduces the likelihood of crime on the proximate parcels.

Creation of Individual Lots for Residential Use that, in Absence of the Assessments, Would Not Have Been Created
In the District, the original owner/developer(s) of the property within the District agreed unanimously to the Assessments. The Assessments provide the necessary funding for improvements that were required as a condition of development and subdivision approval.

Therefore, such Assessments allowed the original property to be subdivided and for development of the parcels to occur. As parcels were sold, new owners were informed of the Assessments through the title reports, and in some cases, through Department of Real Estate “White Paper” reports that the parcels were subject to assessment. Purchase of property was also an “agreement” to pay the Assessment. Therefore, in absence of the Assessments, the lots within most of the District would not have been created. These parcels, and the improvements that were constructed on the parcels, receive direct advantage and special benefit from the Assessments.

General Versus Special Benefit
Proposition 218 requires an assessing agency to separate the general benefits from the special benefits of a public improvement or service, estimate the quantity of each in relation to the other, and limit the assessment amount to the portion of the improvement or service costs attributable to the special benefits.

In the legal decisions known as Golden Hill and Beutz, the California courts have determined that there typically will be some general benefit associated with parks, landscaping and lighting maintenance and improvements because people who don’t reside or own property in an assessment district do receive some, albeit minimal, benefit from the Improvements.

City of Angels Camp
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 21 ends

The separation and quantification of general and special benefits requires an apportionment of the cost of the service or improvement between the two benefit types. General benefits cannot be funded by assessment revenue. Rather, the funding must come from other sources. The Engineer, therefore, has analyzed the quantity to which the general public may reasonably be expected to use or benefit from the improved and maintained areas in relation to the quantity or extent to which property owners within the assessment district use and benefit from the improved and maintained areas.

Although the improved areas may be available to the general public at large, they have been specifically designed, located, and created to provide additional and improved public resources for property inside the District, and not the public at large. Other properties that are either outside the District, or within the District and not assessed, do not enjoy the unique proximity, access, views, and other special benefit factors described previously. These Improvements are of special benefit to properties located within the District because they provide a direct advantage to properties in the District that would not be provided in absence of the Assessments.

There is no widely-accepted or statutory formula for calculating general benefit. General benefits are benefits from improvements or services that are not special in nature, are not “particular and distinct” and are not “over and above” benefits received by other properties. The SVTA vs.

SCCOSA decision provides some clarification by indicating that general benefits provide “an indirect, derivative advantage” and are not necessarily proximate to the improvements.

In other words:

In any case, following is a description of the separation and quantification of general benefit in the District. In each step of this analysis, the more liberal assumptions and determinations have been used in order to ensure that the total calculated general benefit is liberally determined.

A widely-accepted formula to estimate the general benefit is listed below:

Total
Benefit = General Benefit + Special Benefit
City of Angels Camp
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 22 ends

Benefit to Property Outside the District
Properties within the District receive almost all of the special benefits from the Improvements because properties in the District enjoy unique proximity and access to the Improvements that is not enjoyed by other properties or the public at large. Further, the District has significant physical barriers, such as roads, fences, and open space that impede the benefit from the Improvements by properties outside the District. There are only two points of ingress/egress into the District and these points are designed to limit random access. Developed residential properties only exist outside the District along a portion of the northern boundary. Nonetheless, some properties within immediate adjacent proximity of the Improvements, but outside of the boundaries of the District, may receive some benefit from the Improvements. These benefits include improved views, but do not include improved proximity or access, extension of outdoor areas, nor improved lighting. Since these adjacent properties have limited direct view and access, and only receive a small portion of the benefits, a 25% reduction factor is used. This benefit is conferred to properties outside the District’s boundary. It contributes to the overall general benefit calculation and will not be funded by the Assessments.

The general benefit to property outside of the District is calculated as follows with the parcel and data analysis performed by SCI Consulting Group.

Total General Benefit to Properties Outside of the District = 2% Benefit to Property within the Assessment District
The “indirect and derivative” benefit to property within the District is particularly difficult to calculate. A solid argument can be presented that all benefit within the Assessment District is special because the Improvements are clearly “over and above” and “particular and distinct” when compared with the baseline level of service and the unique proximity, access and views of the Improvements enjoyed by benefiting properties in the District.

Assumptions:
43 parcels outside and adjacent to the District
526 parcels in the Assessment District
Calculation
General Benefit to Property outside the Improvement District= (43/(43+526)) * 25% = 2%
City of Angels Camp
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 23 ends

Nevertheless, the SVTA decision indicates there may be general benefit “conferred on real property located in the district.” A measure of the general benefits to property within the District is the percentage of land area within the District that is publicly owned, open to the public, and used for regional purposes such as major roads, rail lines, hospitals, and other regional facilities because such properties, while physically within the District, are used for regional purposes and could provide indirect benefits to the public at large. In this case, essentially 0% of the land area is used for such regional purposes.

Total General Benefit to Properties Inside of the District = 0% Benefit to the Public at Large
This Engineer’s Report uses this general benefit measure as the third component of the overall general benefit quantification. In the Beutz case, the Court opined those general benefits from parks and recreation facilities could be quantified by measuring the use of parks and recreation facilities by people who do not live within the assessment boundaries. Therefore, the general benefit to the public at large can be estimated by the proportionate amount of time that the District’s landscaped, cultural, wildlife and lighting facilities are used and enjoyed by individuals who are not residents, employees, customers, or property owners in the District.

The golf course attracts members of the public at large into the primarily residential District.

Hence, the “Public at Large” within the District used to evaluate this component of general benefit is primarily made up of non-resident golfers.

Some of the Improvements are proximate to the Greenhorn Creek golf course and enjoyed in part by non-resident golfers. However, it should be noted, however, that there are wetlands, cultural areas, and wildlife areas distributed throughout the District, they are in close proximity accessible to all the parcels and contribute to improved views. Finally, the maintenance and improvements to the golf course clearly provide additional, offsetting special benefit to the District’s Improvements.

Based upon observations and records obtained from the golf course operator, use by persons who do not own property within the District are approximately 50% of the persons who use the golf course. Approximately 30,000 rounds of golf are played a year at the golf course. 30,000 rounds * 50% non-resident = 15,000 rounds by non-resident golfers 15,000 rounds/365 days per year = 41 golfers per day
41 non-resident golfers/1,000 approximate total population = 5% City of Angels Camp
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 24 ends

In addition, the street lighting benefits both pedestrians and drivers who reside in the District area as well as those pedestrians and drivers from outside the District (i.e., those walking or driving through or into the District). Because the District involves residential subdivisions with no major arterial roads and few through roads, the vast majority of the walking and driving in the District at night is by those who reside in the area. City staff persons, as well as residents and golf course staff over the years have observed the drivers and pedestrians in the District area. Based on these observations, and experience with other similar projects, the Engineer has determined that approximately 5% of the drivers and pedestrians on the District streets with lighting reside outside the District.
5% General Benefit to non-resident night-time drivers
With 5% of golf course benefit by non-residents and 5% benefit from street lighting to nonresidents, the total general benefit to the public at large is:

Total General Benefit to Public at Large = 5% + 5% = 10% Total General Benefits
Using a sum of these three measures of general benefit, we find that approximately 15% (rounded up from 12%) of the benefits conferred by the Improvements may be general in nature and should be funded by sources other than the assessment.

Quantification of General Benefit Contribution from Other Sources As a result, at least 15% of the District budget must come from sources other than the assessment.

This contribution offsets any general benefits from the Assessment services. This general benefit contribution offset comes from several sources, including the Greenhorn Creek golf course, the City of Angels Camp, and the effective value of the original development. This general benefit contribution exceeds the 15% required general benefit.

General Benefit =
2 % (Outside the District)
+ 0 % (Property within the District)
+ 10 % (Public at Large)
= 12% (Round up to 15%)

City of Angels Camp
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 25 ends

General Benefit Contribution from Greenhorn Golf Course The Greenhorn Creek Golf Course owns, maintains, rehabilitates, and improves the golf course that is proximate and directly adjacent to the Improvements areas maintained by the District, and is largely funded by course use fees and an annual fee from members. The maintenance of the golf course serves to contribute to the maintenance of the District Improvements in significant ways. For example, maintenance of the landscaping proximate to the District’s improved areas provides for improved views, extension of improved areas, weed control, species control, rodent control, and other types of maintenance. The golf course’s pathways provide improved access to the District Improvements. The golf course’s drainage system manages water flow and helps maintain the improved areas. The golf course itself provides a boundary for the Improvements and retains them. The contribution from the Greenhorn Creek golf course towards general benefit from the services described in this section is conservatively estimated to be worth at least 10% of overall costs and benefits.

General Benefit Contribution from Original Development of the Improvements The value of the construction of the Improvements can be quantified and monetized as an annuity. Since this construction was performed and paid for by non-assessment funds, this “annuity” can be used to offset general benefit costs and is conservatively estimated to contribute at least 10%.

Therefore, the total required general benefit is conservatively quantified at 15% (calculated above) which is more than offset by the total non-assessment contribution towards general benefit of 20%.

Zones of Benefit
The boundaries of the District were carefully drawn to include the properties in the District and currently receive special benefit from the Improvements.

The SVTA vs. SCCOSA decision indicates:

General Benefit contribution for non-assessment
sources =
10 % (from golf course)
+ 10 % (from initial development)
= 25% (Total General Benefit contribution)
City of Angels Camp
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 26 ends

“In a well-drawn district — limited to only parcels receiving special benefits from the improvement — every parcel within that district receives a shared special benefit. Under section 2, subdivision (i), these benefits can be construed as being general benefits since they are not “particular and distinct” and are not “over and above” the benefits received by other properties “located in the district.”
“We do not believe that the voters intended to invalidate an assessment district that is narrowly drawn to include only properties directly benefitting from an improvement.

Indeed, the ballot materials reflect otherwise. Thus, if an assessment district is narrowly drawn, the fact that a benefit is conferred throughout the district does not make it general rather than special. In that circumstance, the characterization of a benefit may depend on whether the parcel receives a direct advantage from the improvement (e.g., proximity to park) or receives an indirect, derivative advantage resulting from the overall public benefits of the improvement (e.g., general enhancement of the district’s property values).” In the District, the advantage that each parcel receives from the Improvements is direct, and the boundaries are narrowly drawn to include only parcels that benefit from the assessment.

Therefore, the even spread of assessment throughout the narrowly drawn district is indeed consistent with the OSA decision.

Within the District, zones of benefit are not justified or needed because the Improvements are provided relatively evenly across the entire area and for all parcels. Parcels of similar type in the District receive similar benefits on a per parcel and land area basis. Therefore, zones of benefit are not justified.

Method of Assessment
As previously discussed, the proposed Assessments will provide comprehensive Improvements that will clearly confer special benefits to properties in the proposed District. The allocation of special benefits to property is partially based on the type of property and the size of property.

These benefits can also partially be measured by the occupants on property in the District because such parcel population density is a measure of the relative benefit a parcel receives from the Improvements. It should be noted that many other types of “traditional” assessments also use parcel population densities to apportion the Assessments. For example, the assessments for sewer systems, roads and water systems are typically allocated based on the population density of the parcels assessed. Therefore, the apportionment of benefit is reasonably based on the type of parcel, the size of parcels and the population density of parcels.

City of Angels Camp
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 27 ends

The next step in apportioning Assessments is to determine the relative special benefit for each property. This process involves determining the relative benefit received by each property in relation to a single-family home, or, in other words, on the basis of Single-Family Equivalents (SFE).

This SFE methodology is commonly used to distribute Assessments in proportion to estimated special benefit and is generally recognized as providing the basis for a fair and appropriate distribution of Assessments. For the purposes of this Engineer’s Report, all properties are assigned an SFE value, which is each property’s relative benefit in relation to a single-family home on one parcel. In this case, the "benchmark" property is the single-family detached dwelling which is one Single Family Equivalent or one SFE.

Assessment Apportionment
The Improvements provide direct and special benefit to properties in the District. The District is primarily residential single family development. As such, each single family residential property receives similar benefit from the Improvements. Therefore, the Engineer has determined that the appropriate method of apportionment of the benefits derived by all parcels is on a dwelling unit basis. All improved properties or properties proposed for development are assigned an SFE factor equal to the number of dwelling units developed or planned for the property.

Residential Properties
Certain residential properties in the Assessment Area that contain a single residential dwelling unit and are on a lot of less than or equal to one acre are assigned one Single Family Equivalent or 1.0 SFE. Traditional houses, zero-lot line houses, and town homes are included in this category of single family residential property. Properties with more than one detached single family residence on one acre or less are assigned 1.0 SFE per single family home.

Properties with more than one residential unit (other than parcels with more than one detached single family dwelling as described above) are designated as multi-family residential properties.

These properties benefit from the Improvements in proportion to the number of dwelling units that occupy each property, the average number of people who reside in multi-family residential units versus the average number of people who reside in a single family home and the relative size of each type of residential dwelling unit. The population density factors for the area in City of Angels Camp encompassing the District, as depicted in the following table, provide the basis for determining the SFE factors for residential properties.

City of Angels Camp
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 28 ends

Using the total population in a certain property type in the area of the District from the 2020 Census and dividing it by the total number of such households, finds that approximately 2.16 persons occupy each single family residence, whereas an average of 2.23 persons occupy each multi-family residence. The ratio of 2.16 people on average for a single family residence and 2.23 people per dwelling unit in a multi-family residence unit result in a population density equivalent of 1.03 for multi-family residences. Next, the relative building areas are factored into the analysis because special benefits are related to the average size of a property, in addition to average population densities. For a multi-family residence, this calculation results in an SFE factor of 0.37 per dwelling unit.

Table 10 – Residential Property Types
Source: 2020 Census, City of Angels, and property dwelling size information from the Calaveras County Assessor data and other sources.

Commercial Properties
Commercial properties are generally open and operated for more limited times, relative to residential properties. Therefore, the relative hours of operation can be used as a measure of benefits since employee density also provides a measure of the relative benefit to property. Since commercial properties are typically open and occupied by employees approximately one-half the time of residential properties, it is reasonable to assume that commercial land uses receive onehalf of the special benefit on a land area basis relative to single family residential property.

The average size of a single family home with 1.0 SFE factor in the Service Area is 0.25 acres.

Therefore, a commercial property with 0.25 acres receives one-half the relative benefit, or a 0.50 SFE factor.

The SFE values for various commercial land uses are further defined by using average employee densities because the special benefit factors described previously are also related to the average number of people who work at commercial properties.

Total Occupied Persons per Pop. Density SqFt Proposed
Population Households Household Equivalent Factor Rate
Single Family Residential 3,062 1,419 2.16 1.00 1.00 1.00 Multi-Family Residential (5+ Units) 138 62 2.23 1.03 0.36 0.37 City of Angels Camp
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 29 ends

To determine employee density factors, this Report utilizes the findings from the San Diego County Association of Governments Traffic Generators Study (the “SANDAG Study”) because these findings were approved by the State Legislature which determined the SANDAG Study to be a good representation of the average number of employees per acre of land area for commercial and industrial properties. As determined by the SANDAG Study, the average number of employees per acre for commercial and industrial property is 24. As presented in Figure 1, the SFE factors for other types of businesses are determined relative to their typical employee density in relation to the average of 24 employees per acre of commercial property.

Table 11 – Commercial/Industrial Benefit Assessment Factors

1. Source: San Diego Association of Governments Traffic Generators Study, University of California, Davis and other studies and sources.

2. The SFE factors for commercial and industrial parcels indicated above are applied to each fourth acre of land area or portion thereof. Additional acres over five for commercial, office, shopping center and industrial parcels are calculated per acre or portion thereof. (Therefore, the minimum assessment for any assessable parcel in these categories is the SFE Units listed herein.) Vacant/Undeveloped Properties
The Improvements will make the land in the District more desirable and useable. The benefit to undeveloped properties is determined to be proportional to the corresponding benefits for similar type developed properties, but at a lower rate due to the lack of improvements on the property. A measure of the benefits accruing to the underlying land is the average value of land in relation to Improvements for developed property. An analysis of the assessed valuation data from the City of Angels Camp found that approximately 15% of the assessed value of improved properties is classified as the land value. It is reasonable to assume, therefore, that approximately 15% of the benefits are related to the underlying land and 85% are related to the improvements and the day-to-day use of the property. Using this ratio, the SFE factor for vacant/undeveloped parcels is 0.15 per parcel.

Average SFE Units SFE Units
Type of Commercial Employees per per
Land Use Per Acre 1 Quarter Acre 2 Acre After 5
Commercial 24 0.500 0.500
Office 68 1.420 1.420
Shopping Center 24 0.500 0.500
Self Storage or Parking Lot 1 0.021 0.021
City of Angels Camp
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 30 ends

Other Property Types
For certain properties, additional analysis and calculation of special benefit is required, as indicated below:

Golf Course Fairways and Greens
Golf course fairways and greens parcels do provide special benefit in the form of improved views and beautification to all parcels within the District – however, they also receive some special benefit from the proposed Improvements as enjoyed by golfers on these parcels. The fairways and green parcels include:

Parcel Acres
058-045-002-000 19.56
058-046-013-000 35.14
058-046-015-000 39.47
058-047-005-000 8.84
058-047-009-000 25.37
058-047-012-000* 28.55
058-060-006-000** 1.74
Total acreage = 158.67
*Note: mixed-use parcel – 2.5 sfe added for Caddy Shack Rental **Note: entry way parcel with similar benefit to fairways and greens The Engineer has conducted an analysis and determined that there are typically 21 golfers on the course at anytime.

The special benefit is calculated as such:
21 golfers/2.16 household residents = 9.72 Single Family Equivalents of special benefit

9.72 SFE’s/158.67 acres = 0.0612 SFEs/ acre
Fitness, Tennis, Basketball, Pool, etc.

Fitness and sport court parcels receive special benefit from the improvements similar to other parcels. The fitness and court sport parcels include:

Parcel Acres
058-071-014-000 1.91
058-043-005-000 0.33
058-080-019-000 1.36
Total acreage = 3.60
The Engineer has conducted an analysis and determined that there are typically 5 users on these facilities at anytime.

City of Angels Camp
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 31 ends

The special benefit is calculated as such:
5 users/2.16 household residents = 2.314 SFEs of special benefit

2.314 SFE’s/3.60 acres = 0.6430 SFEs/ acre
Club house (Restaurant, Pro Shop, and Wedding Facilities) The Club house parcel does provide special benefit similar to the other parcels. The club house parcel include:

Parcel Acres
058-046-007-000 2.86
Total acreage = 2.86
The Engineer has conducted an analysis and determined that there are typically 7 golfers in Club house, 15 restaurant customers, 1 pro shop customers, and 2 special event guests anytime at anytime.

The special benefit is calculated as such:

The benefit to golfers + benefit to restaurant customers + benefit to pro shop customers + benefit to special event guests
(7 golfers + 18 non-golfers)/2.16 household residents = 11.5740 SFEs of special benefit

11.5740 SFE’s/2.86 acres = 4.0468 SFEs/ acre
Annual Cost Indexing
It should also be noted that, if the Assessments are approved, the maximum assessment rate within the Improvement District may increase in future years based on the annual increase, if any, in the Northern California (San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward) Consumer Price Index-All Urban Consumers (the “CPI”) from December to December of each year, with a maximum annual adjustment not to exceed 3% per year.

Any change in the CPI in excess of 3% shall be cumulatively reserved as the “Unused CPI” and shall be used to increase the maximum authorized assessment rate in years in which the CPI is less than 3%. The maximum authorized assessment rate is equal to the maximum assessment rate in the first fiscal year the assessment was levied adjusted annually by the minimum of 1) 3% or 2) the change in the CPI plus any Unused CPI as described above.

City of Angels Camp
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 32 ends

Duration of Assessment
It is proposed that the Assessments, if approved by property owners, will be continued every year after their formation, so long as the public Improvements need to be maintained and improved, and the City requires funding from the Assessments for these Improvements in the District. As noted previously, the Assessment can continue to be levied annually after the City Council approves an annually updated Engineer’s Report, budget for the Assessment, Improvements to be provided, and other specifics of the Assessment. In addition, the City Council must hold an annual public hearing to continue the Assessment.

Appeals of Assessments Levied to Property
Any property owner who feels that the Assessment levied on the subject property is in error as a result of incorrect information being used to apply the foregoing method of assessment may file a written appeal with the City of Angels Camp City Administrator or their designee. Any such appeal is limited to correction of an Assessment during the then-current Fiscal Year and applicable law. Upon the filing of any such appeal, the City Administrator or their designee will promptly review the appeal and any information provided by the property owner. If the City Administrator or their designee finds that the Assessment should be modified, the appropriate changes shall be made to the Assessment Roll. If any such changes are approved after the Assessment Roll has been filed with the County for collection, the City Administrator or their designee is authorized to refund to the property owner the amount of any approved reduction. Any dispute over the decision of the City Administrator or their designee shall be referred to the Angels Camp City Council, and the decision of the City Council shall be final.

Assessment Funds Must Be Expended within the District
The net available Assessment funds, after incidental, administrative, financing, and other costs shall be expended exclusively for Improvements within the boundaries of the District or as described herein, and appropriate incidental and administrative costs as defined in the Plans and Specifications section.

Oversight, Annual Review, and Accountability
The Assessment proceeds and expenditures will also be reviewed and overseen by the City Council. In addition, the Assessment budget, Assessment rate, Assessment CPI increase, and Improvements will be reviewed at a noticed public hearing by the Councill and public.

City of Angels Camp
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 33 ends

In general, the public review and accountability process is as follows: The Assessments will not automatically continue and will require specific actions, reports, and procedures for continuation.

In each subsequent year for which the Assessments will be levied, the Council must preliminarily approve at a public meeting a budget and costs for the upcoming Fiscal Year’s Improvements, an updated annual Engineer’s Report, and an updated Assessment roll listing all parcels and their Assessments. At this meeting, the Council will also call for the publication in a local newspaper of a legal notice of the intent to continue the Assessments for the next Fiscal Year and set the date for the noticed public hearing. At the annual public hearing, members of the public can provide input to the Council prior to the Council’s decision on ordering the Improvements and the Assessments for the next Fiscal Year.

Citizens’ Oversight Committee
A Citizens’ Oversight Committee (the “Citizens’ Oversight Committee”) will be established for the Assessment District. The Citizens’ Oversight Committee shall review potential projects that may be funded by the assessments and shall make recommendations about the expenditure of assessment funds. Members of the Citizens’ Oversight Committee will be nominated and approved by the City Council. All members of the Citizens’ Oversight Committee shall own property within the Assessment District and shall not have conflicts of interest with the Assessment District or the Services funded by the Assessments. The Citizens’ Oversight Committee will meet quarterly on an annual basis.

City of Angels Camp
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 34 ends

Assessment
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Angels Camp, County of Calaveras, California, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 and Article XIIID of the California Constitution (collectively “the Act”), adopted its Resolution Initiating Proceedings For the Formation of the Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District; WHEREAS, the Resolution directed the undersigned Engineer of Work to prepare and file a report presenting a description of the Improvements, an estimate of the costs of the Improvements, a diagram for the Assessment District and an assessment of the estimated costs of the Improvements upon all assessable parcels within the Assessment District, to which Resolution and the description of the Improvements therein contained, reference is hereby made for further particulars;
NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned, by virtue of the power vested in me under the Act and the order of the City Council of the City of Angels Camp, hereby make the following assessment to cover the portion of the estimated cost of the Improvements, and the costs and expenses incidental thereto to be paid by the Assessment District.

The amount of the costs of the Improvements and related incidental expense to be paid by the District for the fiscal year 2022-23 is as follows:

Table 12 – Budget Summary
As required by the Act, the Assessment Diagram is hereto attached and made a part hereof showing the exterior boundaries of the District. The distinctive number of each parcel or lot of land in the City of Angels Landscaping and Lighting District No. 2 – Greenhorn Creek is its Assessor Parcel Number appearing on the Assessment Roll.

Management, Legal, & Insurance 68,991
Protected Cultural Areas 44,672
15,035
Wetlands 5,278
Streetlights 14,272
Landscaping & Water 180,002
Hardscape 3,885
Miscellaneous 11,940
Net Amount to Assessments $ 344,076
Wildlife Corridor
City of Angels Camp
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 35 ends

I do hereby assess and apportion the net amount of the cost and expenses of the Improvements, including the related incidental expenses, upon the parcels and lots of land within the District, in accordance with the special benefits to be received by each parcel or lot, from the Improvements, and more particularly set forth in the Cost Estimate and Method of Assessment in the Report.

The assessment is made upon the parcels or lots of land within the District in proportion to the special benefits to be received by the parcels or lots of land, from the Improvements.

The Assessment is subject to an annual increase tied to the Consumer Price Index-All Urban Consumers for Northern California (San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward) as of December of each succeeding year (the “CPI”).

Each parcel or lot of land is described in the Assessment Roll by reference to its parcel number as shown on the Assessor's Maps of the County of Calaveras for the fiscal year 2022-23. For a more particular description of the parcel, reference is hereby made to the deeds and maps on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder of Calaveras County.

I hereby place opposite the Assessor Parcel Number for each parcel or lot within the Assessment Rolls, the amount of the assessment for the fiscal year 2022-23 for each parcel or lot of land within the District.

Dated: June 1, 2022
________________________________
Engineer of Work
By John W. Bliss, License No. C052091
City of Angels Camp
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 36 ends

Assessment Diagram
The District Boundary and the parcels to be assessed in Landscaping and Lighting District No. 2 – Greenhorn Creek are displayed on the Assessment Diagram, which is on file with the City Clerk of the City of Angels Camp. The following Assessment Diagram is for general location only and is not to be considered the official boundary map. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions as shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County of Calaveras for Fiscal Year 2022-23, and are incorporated herein by reference, and made a part of this Diagram and this Report.

City of Angels Camp
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 37 ends

City of Angels Camp
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 38 ends

Assessment Roll, FY 2022-23
An Assessment Roll (a listing of all parcels assessed within the Assessment District and the amount of the assessment) is below.

Each lot or parcel listed on the Assessment Roll is shown and illustrated on the latest County Assessor records and these records are, by reference made part of this Report. These records shall govern for all details concerning the description of the lots or parcels.

City of Angels Camp
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 39 ends

City of Angels Camp
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 40 ends

City of Angels Camp
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 41 ends

City of Angels Camp
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 42 ends

City of Angels Camp
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 43 ends

City of Angels Camp
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 2 - Greenhorn Creek Engineer’s Report, FY 2022-23

Page 44 ends

City of Angels Council Meeting
JUNE 7, 2022 REGULAR AGENDA 7.B

B. Discussion and Approval of Budget Amendment for Water Line Replacement Project Overage, Rebecca Callen, City Administrator
___________________________________________________________________

CITY HALL
CITY OF ANGELS PO Box 667, 200 Monte Verda St. Suite B, Angels Camp, CA 95222 P: (209) 736-2181 DATE: June 7, 2022
TO: City Council
FROM: Rebecca Callen, City Administrator
RE: DISCUSSION AND APPROVAL OF A BUDGET AMENDMENT FOR WATER LINE

REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVERAGE

RECOMMENDATION
Approve a budget amendment of $32,000 to address unforeseen rock while performing the water line replacement work on the Murphys Grade Project.

BACKGROUND
City Council approved a water line replacement on the Murphys Grade Road project. The total budget was $300,171.30 on January 4, 2022.

DISCUSSION
The contractor ran into the unforeseen rock when they were digging which required scope of work beyond the budget. This also caused additional construction management overages. The contractor has additional costs of $27,000 and there is an additional construction management costs of $5,000.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
Increase of project budget for $32,000 to be funded with Water Capital Replacement funds (365- 8001-52151 Project 52151). Additionally, the entire $300,171.30 that was budgeted also requires to be moved from the MGR Sidewalk Project to 52151 The MGR Waterline Replacement project.

Attachment: December 28, 2021 Staff report

City of Angels Camp
Budget Adjustment Request
Department: 8001-Water Replacement Date: 6/7/2022
Account Number Account Description
Previous Budget
Balance
Change Request
Amount: Expense
Inc/(Dec), Revenue
(Inc)/Dec
New Budget Balance

DB/(CR)
365-8001-52151 Create Budget for Water Line Replace $ - $ 300,172.00 $ 300,172.00 365-8001-52151 Amend Water line Budget $ - $ 27,000.00 $ 27,000.00 $ -
139-2011-52065 Reduce MGR Project $ 1,143,000.00 $ (327,172.00) $ 815,828.00 $ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total* $ 1,143,000.00 - $ 1,143,000.00
Justification:

Authorizations:

Department Manager Date:

Fiscal Manager: Date:

Administrator:** Date:

Entered into System by: Date:
********************* *********************************** *************** ***************** ***************** *Total must be zero unless additional budget authorization given by Council. **Administrator must approve all budget adjustments not authorized by Council.

Murphys Grade Project was in the Transportation budget and contract. Need to move all expenses to the Water R&R fund and establish a budget for it and the Change order City of Angels Council Meeting
JUNE 7, 2022 REGULAR AGENDA 7.C

C. Discussion and Direction of City Council Representation Changes for Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) and Destinations Angels Camp (DAC), Rebecca Callen, City Administrator
___________________________________________________________________

LOCAL AREA FORMATION COUNCIL (LAFCO) AND DESTINATIONS ANGELS CAMP (DAC)

RECOMMENDATION
Appoint different Council on the Destination Angels Camp Board.

BACKGROUND
Council Member Gretel Tiscornia was appointed as the Destination Angels Camp Board member.

Unfortunately, her schedule conflicts with the DAC board meetings.

DISCUSSION
The council needs to identify a different Council Member to represent the City on the DAC board. Brief discussions identified a possible solution to swap LAFCO representative with the DAC representative.

Given the City is the main financial contributor to Destination Angels Camp, it is very important that the City Council and Staff regularly attend and participate in the Board and Executive meetings.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
None
City of Angels Council Meeting
JUNE 7, 2022 REGULAR AGENDA 7.D

D. Discussion and Direction to Award a Contract to CSG Consultants, Inc (CSG) for Building Official, Plan Review, and Code Compliance, Rebecca Callen, City Administrator
___________________________________________________________________

CITY HALL
CITY OF ANGELS PO Box 667, 200 Monte Verda St. Suite B, Angels Camp, CA 95222 P: (209) 736-2181 1 DATE: June 7, 2022
TO: City Council
FROM: Rebecca Callen, City Administrator
RE: DISCUSSION AND DIRECTION TO AWARD A CONTRACT TO CSG CONSULTANTS, INC (CSG) FOR BUILDING OFFICIAL, PLAN REVIEW, AND CODE COMPLIANCE

RECOMMENDATION
Approve recommendation to award a contract for services to CSG Consultants, Inc. (CSG) effective July 1, 2022, for three years (June 30, 2025).

BACKGROUND
The City of Angels issued an RFQ on November 1, 2018, for Building Official/Inspector services. The award was issued to Interwest for one year with an option for two, one-year extensions. The end date of the contract was December 18, 2021. On November 2, 2021, the city extended the term to March 31, 2022, and then ultimately requested an extension through June 30, 2022, to allow for a full RFQ to be issued.

DISCUSSION
The City Administrator issued an RFQ for Building Official/Inspector services, with additional scope to include Code Enforcement via Public Purchase RFQ #4000-01-22 on April 4, 2022, with a closing date of May 6, 2022. The Bid Notification went out to 4,519 firms that match the classifications selected. 37 firms downloaded the RFQ documents and 3 ultimately responded.

The RFQ included the overall scope and contract that would be required by respondents. On May 27, 2022, a panel of three reviewed the proposals against the RFQ Scope, Statement of Qualifications Submittal requirements, and rated them based on their proposals. The panel included Amy Augustine, Planning Director, Calaveras County Building Official Doug Oliver, and the City Administrator, Rebecca Callen.

The three respondents were:
• Shums Coda Associates
• Interwest Consulting Group, Inc.
• CSG, Consultants, Inc.

CITY HALL
CITY OF ANGELS PO Box 667, 200 Monte Verda St. Suite B, Angels Camp, CA 95222 P: (209) 736-2181 2 CSG was the only respondent that had a fully developed Code Compliance and Enforcement department in addition to local staffing. All of CSGs staff were exceptionally certificated to best protect the City against liability and had extensive staffing levels that can handle a wide array of building projects.

The billing structure does require the City to amend its Building Permit Fee, breaking it into a Plan Check Fee and a Building Inspection fee.

They had one additional change they wanted on the Contract Template and legal is reviewing it.

Additional changes that will occur in the process of going to CSG will be a centralized Plan Review. Plans will be submitted electronically or picked up, at their cost, and scanned and reviewed by their plan review section. The maximum time frame for initial review will be 10 business days, with simple plans such as solar taking far less. All plans will be submitted back to us electronically allowing us to move more expeditiously to an electronic file storage solution, which has been discussed.

Inspections can be handled by a shared inspector that will work between Sonora and the City of Angels.

The initial Code Compliance efforts will be around education and outreach, which will help us facilitate and train staff on tools that they can use. Statistics tell us that 75% of all violations are due to a lack of education and outreach. 25% ultimately require more enforcement. CSG has Code Enforcement staffing that can ultimately assist us should those come to that phase.

The Contract for Services will be submitted for approval at the June 21, 2022 meeting.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The 2022-23 Fiscal Year Budget includes $90,000 for Building and $20,000 for Code Compliance.

ATTACHMENTS
CSG Proposal
5151 North Palm Avenue, Suite 530
Fresno, CA 93704
559.819.8725 phone
650.522.2599 fax
www.csgengr.com

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS TO THE
City of Angels
Building Official/Inspector
M a y 6 , 2 0 2 2

CSG SOQ TO THE CITY OF ANGELS

BUILDING OFFICIAL / INSPECTOR SERVICES
1 Table of Contents
S E C T I O N 1 Cover Letter 2
S E C T I O N 2 Project Organization & Key Personnel 5
S E C T I O N 3 Consultant Qualifications & References 24 S E C T I O N 4 Billing Rate 38
S E C T I O N 5 Contract Comments 40

CSG SOQ TO THE CITY OF ANGELS

BUILDING OFFICIAL / INSPECTOR SERVICES
5151 North Palm Avenue, Suite 530, Fresno, CA 93704
phone 559.819.8725 | fax 650.522.2599 | www.csgengr.com Cover Letter
May 6, 2022
Rebecca Callen
City Administrator
City of Angels
PO Box 667
200 Monte Verda, Suite B
Angels Camp, CA 95222
Re: RFQ for Building Official / Inspector
CSG Consultants, Inc. (CSG) would like to thank the City of Angels (City) for the opportunity to present its proposal for as-needed plan review, building inspection, permit technician, code enforcement and Building Official services. Our firm brings specialized expertise; knowledgeable, experienced and customer service-focused building department and code enforcement staff, and proven digital plan submittal and review services.

CSG can readily provide the requested services with the proposed personnel herein. CSG staff will become adjunct to staff, working with the City Administrator or designee and various departments to perform as-needed professional building services including, but not limited to building official, plan review, permit technician, building inspection, and code enforcement services. If selected, CSG will work with the City of Angels to create an efficient and cost-effective service model for the City of Angels Camp.

CSG currently furnishes building and safety, public works, planning, fire prevention, code enforcement and other municipal services to over 250 clients including many nearby communities. We perform work solely for public agencies, eliminating the potential for conflicts of interest. In this way, we can focus exclusively on the specific needs of our municipal clients. We have a solutions-oriented approach to our work, leveraging our team’s depth and breadth of experience and technical expertise to resolve issues for our clients.

Our local office is in Fresno and we can easily be available for meetings at the City when requested. Jeff Janes, CBO, Regional Operations Manager, will serve as the City’s primary contact. He will ensure that all services to the City are provided in a timely and efficient manner.

Jeff Janes, CBO, CFM | Primary Contact / Regional Operations Manager 5151 North Palm Avenue, Suite 530, Fresno, CA 93704
559.819.8725 Ext. 2256 office | 559.593.1002 cell | [email protected] Please feel free to contact Mr. Janes with any questions or comments you may have regarding our proposal. We greatly look forward for the opportunity to provide customer focused building department and code enforcement services to the City of Angels.

Sincerely,
Cyrus Kianpour, PE, PLS
President, CSG Consultants, Inc.

SEC TION 1

CSG SOQ TO THE CITY OF ANGELS

BUILDING OFFICIAL / INSPECTOR SERVICES
3 F I R M P R O F I L E
CSG Consultants, Inc. (CSG) is an employee-owned California company with its local office in Fresno and headquarters in Foster City, CA. Additional support is available from our other offices in Sacramento, Newman, Pleasanton, San Jose, and Orange. Founded in 1991, CSG performs work solely for public agencies, eliminating the potential for conflicts of interest between developers and agencies. In this way, we can focus exclusively on the specific needs of our municipal clients.

NAME OF FIRM: CSG Consultants, Inc.

PRIMARY CONTACT Jeff Janes, CBO, CFM | Regional Operations Manager (559) 819.8725 office • (559) 593-1002 cell • [email protected] LOCAL OFFICE: 5151 North Palm Avenue, Suite 530, Fresno, CA 93704 (559) 819-8725 phone
HEADQUARTERS: 550 Pilgrim Drive, Foster City, CA 94404
(650) 522-2500 phone • (650) 522-2599 fax
www.csgengr.com • [email protected]
REGIONAL OFFICES: 1303 J Street, #270, Sacramento, CA 95814 930 Fresno Street, Newman, CA 95360
3875 Hopyard Road, Suite 141, Pleasanton, CA 94588
3150 Almaden Expressway, Suite 255, San Jose, CA 95118
3707 W. Garden Grove Boulevard, Suite 100, Orange, CA 92868 YEARS IN BUSINESS: 30 • Founded in 1991
OWNERSHIP: Employee-Owned
EMPLOYEES: 300+
TYPE OF BUSINESS: California Corporation • Incorporated June 15, 2000 • Federal ID: 91-2053749

S T A F F C O M P OS I T I O N
The majority of the 300+ individuals within our firm have provided public agency services throughout their entire careers. Our talented personnel, having held positions within communities facing similar development concerns as the City of Angels Camp, bring a wealth of ideas, experience, and solutions. Depending upon the needs of our clients, we can serve in either a project-specific or on-call staff augmentation capacity. CSG maintains the breadth and depth of experienced and licensed/certified staff necessary to support the City’s needs.

Our multi-disciplined municipal services staff consists of the following types of professionals:
 Building Plan Reviewers & Inspectors  Code Enforcement Officers  Fire Plan Reviewers & Inspectors  Planning Professionals  Structural Engineers  Grading Improvement Plan Reviewers & Inspectors  Plan Review Engineers  Civil Engineers
 Fire Protection Engineers  Construction Managers
 Building Officials  Construction Inspectors
 CASp Professionals  Information Technology Professionals  Permit Technicians  Sustainability Professionals

CSG SOQ TO THE CITY OF ANGELS

BUILDING OFFICIAL / INSPECTOR SERVICES
4 C O M P R E H E N S I V E M U NI C I P AL S E R VI C E S CSG provides a wide range of services to community development and public works departments, often seamlessly serving as an extension of agency staff. We are customer-centric and organized into the lines of business outlined below, each managed by highly experienced industry experts. Many of CSG’s personnel serve more than one line of business, which improves the quality of customer service and results in high employee retention.

B UILDI NG & FI RE LIF E

S AF ET Y
Building Department Administration
Building Plan Review and Inspection
Fire Plan Review and Inspection
Structural Plan Review
OSHPD3 Review
CASp Assessment and Inspection
Public Facilities Assessment
LEED/Green Building Services
Code Compliance/Enforcement
Staff Augmentation

P LA NNI NG &

S UST AINA BILIT Y
Staff Augmentation for Current and Advance
Planning
Project Management Including Plan
Amendments
CEQA Environmental Review
Energy Efficiency, Water Conservation, Solid
Waste Program Development
AB 32 Compliance/Climate Action Plan
Development and Implementation
Greenhouse Gas Reduction Strategies
Grant Writing and Grant Management

I NF ORMA TI ON

T EC HNOL OGY
GreenVue Permitting Software
Digital Plan Review
Electronic Archiving
Web-Based Construction Management Asset
Management
Project Management
GIS and IT Support

P UBLI C W OR KS

E NGI NE ERI NG & D ESI GN
Capital Improvement Project Design:

Transportation/Roadway, Water and
Sewer Utilities, Traffic Engineering
Development Review, Plan Check, Surveying
and Mapping, Storm Water Program
Compliance (NPDES, QSP/QSD)

C IP P R OJE CT & P R OGR AM

M A NA GEME NT
Capital Improvement Program Development
and Implementation
Federal and State Grant Administration
Rule 20A Undergrounding
Staff Augmentation Including: Design
Consultant Coordination, Project Scoping,
RFP Preparation

C ONST RUCT ION M A NA GEME NT
& I NS PE CTI ON
Contract Administration, including: Resident
Engineer Oversight, Inspection and
Construction Management
Constructability/Bidability Reviews
Cost and Schedule Control
Claims Avoidance

CSG SOQ TO THE CITY OF ANGELS

BUILDING OFFICIAL / INSPECTOR SERVICES
5 ProposalOrganization & Key Personnel

T E A M & O RG A N I Z AT I O N AL S T R U C T U R E
CSG proposes the following staff and organizational structure for this project. Jeff Janes, CBO, CFM will serve as the primary point of contact and as the project manager for the City for this contract—overseeing all proposed staff indicated below; allocating appropriate levels of plan review resources to this contract; and ensuring that work is comprehensive, thorough, and meets the City’s deadlines. CSG maintains the breadth and depth of experienced and licensed and/or certified staff necessary to support the City’s needs for the proposed services. Key personnel are indicated with an asterisk. Resumes for proposed key personnel are provided on the following pages for the City’s review. Additional resumes can be provided upon request from the City.

SEC TION 2
Jeff Janes, CBO, CFM*
Primary Contact / Regional Operations Manager

PROJECT MANAGEMENT/BUILDING OFFICIAL
Robert Cushing, REHS*

CODE ENFORCEMENT MANAGER

BUILDING INSPECTION
Randy Conley*
Senior Building Inspector
David Telly
Building Inspector II
Joshua Laupua*
Building Inspector
Jared Claypool
Building Inspector
Mike Leach, CBO*
Senior Building Inspector
Henry Centeno
Senior Building Inspector
Kenneth Cabral
Building Inspector
Heath Immer*
Senior Building Inspector

BUILDING PLAN REVIEW
Yvonne Christopher, CBO*
Principal Plans Examiner
Steven May*
Principal Plans Examiner
Thomas Pallinger*
Senior Plans Examiner
Phiroze Wadia, SE, LEED AP*
Principal Structural Engineer
Shweta Prakash, PE, CBO
Principal Plan Check Engineer
Bounmy Soumountha, SE, CBO*
Senior Structural Engineer
Farzam Tondnevis, PE
Associate Plan Check Engineer
Jonathan Hurst*
Senior Plans Examiner
Gabriela Scott*
Senior Plans Examiner
Stuart England*
Senior Plans Examiner
Mike Brinkman, CASp, CBO, MCP
Senior Plan Reviewr
Rajesh Vangala, CBO, CASp*
Principal Plans Examiner
Kit Wong
Principal Plans Examiner
Rick McManis, CBO, MCP*
Senior Plans Examiner
David Nesbet, PE
Senior Plan Check Engineer
Linh Tran, PE
Senior Plan Check Engineer
Helen Chiu, PE
Senior Plan Check Engineer
Fuyen Yang, PE, LEED GA
Associate Plan Check Engineer
Lily Hallett, CASp
Building Plans Examiner
Mark Sadowski*
Senior Plans Examiner
Andrew Stuffler, CBO
Senior Plans Examiner
Shiping Feng, SE
Senior Structural Engineer
Rafael Cornejo, PE, CASp, CBO
Senior Plan Check Engineer

CODE ENFORCEMENT
James Jonte*
Code Enforcement Officer

PERMIT TECHNICIAN
Christine Uhalde
Permit Technician
Vanessa Rogers
Permit Technician
Megan Olivera
Permit Technician
6 Jeff

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
Certified Building Official
Certified Fire Marshal
Certified Building Plans Examiner
Certified Residential Building Inspector
Certified Building Code Specialist
Certified Building Inspector
Certified Commercial Building
Inspector
Spray Applied Fire Proofing Special
Inspector
| ICC 5012845
Firestopping CLA
Swimming Pools & Spas CLA

EDUCATION
Master of Science, Ecological Design
San Francisco Institute of Architecture
| San Francisco, CA
Bachelor of Science, Architecture
San Francisco Institute of Architecture
| San Francisco, CA
Associate in Science, Architecture
Fresno City College
| Fresno, CA
Special Studies Design Program
Harvard University
| Boston, MA

PROFESSIONAL

AFFILIATIONS
Building Official of the Year, County
Building Officials Association, CA 2015
California Building Officials, Past
Executive Board Member & Past
President
County Building Officials Association of
CA, Past President
Yosemite and San Joaquin Chapter of
ICC
Janes CBO, CFM
Building Official
Mr. Janes is a highly experienced ICC Certified Building Official with extensive building department administration and management experience. He is experienced in supervision and coordination of the activities, operations of jurisdictional building and safety divisions, including the University of California, Merced expansion project. In addition, Mr. Janes serves as the Regional Manager for the Fresno Office which includes the Central Valley to the Central Coast. Specific skills includes budget strategy, preparation and oversight, and implementation of best practices across multiple departments. Mr. Janes is knowledgeable in enforcing compliance and minimum standards to safeguard life, limb, health, property and public welfare.

Mr. Janes has also successfully guided department staff with inspection and plan review for all phases of complex construction projects. He is experienced utilizing building department permit tracking software and managing all common building department responsibilities, including plan review, multi-discipline inspections, plan review and inspection scheduling, field supervision, regulatory compliance, code interpretation, and project acceptance. Mr. Janes also makes a difference to our clients and those he works with through his skills in complaint resolution, problem solving, damage assessment and team building.

R E L E V A N T E X P E R I E N C E
Building Official | Multiple CSG Clients
Mr. Janes currently serves as a Building Official for CSG clients.

Regional Manager/Building Official | Interwest Consulting Group Mr. Janes served as a Building Official for clients throughout California included UC Merced 2020 Project – a $1.4 billion-dollar major campus expansion project which includes site preparation and construction of multiple state of the art educational facilities.

County Building Official | County of Fresno, CA
Mr. Janes managed four units in the Development Services Division (plan check, inspection, zoning, and code enforcement). He streamlined the triage process for plan check submittals, created an e-blast network of design professionals for code updating and internal processing procedures. Mr. Janes also established a free public code training update class with other jurisdictions, coordinated joint bulletins with surrounding jurisdictions and improved initial code enforcement communication processes.

County Building Official | County of Madera, CA
Mr. Janes managed and applied the principles of supervision, organizational and operation of a modern building department to the County of Madera. He reviewed and examined construction documents for residential, commercial and industrial building construction and alterations; ensured plans, structural calculations and specifications complied with building and related codes and regulations. He recommended necessary changes for compliance with applicable codes and regulations while routing applicants to appropriate divisions, implemented staff training for building inspectors, standardized public information handouts and information as well as successfully worked with other agencies, departments, officials, employees, contractors and the general public.
7 Robert L.

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
Registered Environmental Health
Specialist (REHS) | Registration # 3000
Police Officer Standards Training
(POST):

PC 832
Various Cal EPA Solid Waste and
Environmental Certifications

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Arts, Environmental Health
San Jose State University | San Jose,
CA
Master of Arts, Public Health Education
San Jose State University | San Jose,
CA

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
California Association of Code Enforcement
Officers (CACEO)
California Environmental Health Association
(CEHA)
Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Service
Authority (AVASA)
Cushing REHS
Code Enforcement Manager
Mr. Cushing has over 30 years of experience in enforcing health and safety codes, the abatement of abandoned vehicles, enforcing local regulations, and drafting legislation.

With expertise in investigation, mediation, conflict management and California codes, Mr.

Cushing brings a proactive approach to resolving code compliance issues for CSG’s client agencies.

Prior to joining CSG, Mr. Cushing worked for the City of San Jose, California’s third largest city, in a variety of jobs including Chief of Code Enforcement, Secretary of the Code Enforcement Appeals Commission and the President of the City of San Jose Management Employees Association.

In addition to his Code Enforcement Management work, Mr. Cushing serves as the CEO for the Santa Clara County Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Authority, a California Joint Powers Agency.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Code Enforcement Manager | Multiple CSG Client Agencies Mr. Cushing is CSG’s Manager of Code Enforcement in charge of both code enforcement officers and permit technicians.

In addition to his management responsibilities, he has worked directly with CSG client agencies on specific code enforcement projects. For the City of Pittsburg, for example, Mr.

Cushing proposed policies and procedures to develop a Rental Housing Inspection program that improved the quality of the City’s housing stock enabling it to be more financially selfsustaining. In the Cities/Towns of Atherton, Marina, and Monte Sereno, Mr. Cushing performed code compliance inspections and periodically reviewed these enforcement programs. His approach to the resolution of long-standing cases resulted in the elimination of complaint back-logs.

Mr. Cushing has been at the forefront of the Evaluation and Assessment Program for select CSG clients. He has assisted the County of New Castle, DE in examining and reviewing its program and how to improve their operations and morale. He is currently overseeing similar projects for the City of Kerman and the County of San Joaquin. While serving in the Cities/Towns of Pittsburg, Pinole, and Los Altos Hills, Mr. Cushing analyzed program efficiency and effectiveness and developed procedures to enhance outdated Code Enforcement programs. He initiated and implemented a dangerous tree enforcement program in Los Altos Hills. Mr. Cushing also completed an audit of the Code Enforcement Program for the County of Monterey and delivered a “Review of the Code Enforcement Program” report for the County.

Mr. Cushing is also the Chief Executive Officer for the Santa Clara County Abandoned Vehicle Authority overseeing an Agency budget of $1.7 million dollars and 15 member cities.

ADDITIONAL RELATED EXPERIENCE
Chief/Supervisor of Code Enforcement | City of San Jose, CA Mr. Cushing managed the Code Enforcement Division for over 20 years and through several department transitions and programs implementations including the CDBG Block Grant Program, Administrative Remedies Program, San Jose Appeals Hearing Board Vehicle Abatement, and various programs within the Department of Planning, Building and Code Enforcement. He directed 6 Supervisors, 20 Vehicle Abatement Officers and 45 Code Enforcement Officers.
8 Yvonne

LICENSES &

CERTIFICATIONS
Certified Building Official,
Certified Plans Examiner
Building Inspector – UBC
Plumbing Inspector-UPC
Electrical Inspector-NEC
Mechanical Inspector-UMC
Combination Inspector
Rehab/Conservation Inspector
Commercial Combo Inspector
|ICC 1026471

EDUCATION
AA, Building Inspection
Technology
Butte Community College
| Oroville, CA
AA, General Education
Cosumnes River College
| Sacramento, CA

PROFESSIONAL

AFFILIATIONS

USGBC- LEED
National Fire Protection
Association (NFPA)
Sacramento Valley Association of
Building Officials
Christopher CBO
Principal Plans Examiner
Ms. Christopher brings over 30 years of experience to CSG. Having served as Building Official, Inspector and Plans Examiner for multiple jurisdictions in California, Ms. Christopher offers a wealth of knowledge and expertise to CSG’s clients.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Chief Building Official | B r e n t w o o d , C A
Ms. Christopher managed the daily operations of the Building Division, including staffing, budgeting, and interdepartmental committees. She performed non-residential and residential plan reviews and field inspections on a regular basis. Ms. Christopher served as the flood plain administrator, managing all FEMA FIRM maps, LOMR and LOMC. In addition, she was manager of the housing division, including the management of 12 City owned rental units, two loan programs, and the affordable housing program for new developments. Ms. Christopher also managed all Code Enforcement staff and activities, which included the rental inspection program, business license enforcement, and SWPPPs.

Building Official / Director of Development Services | B u t t e C o u n t y , O r o v i l l e , C A As a Building Official, Ms. Christopher applied model code knowledge to plan review, inspections, and code enforcement. Her role included training staff in all aspects of building codes and administration.

Ms. Christopher provided code interpretation, assistance to the public and staff, and interfaced regularly with the Valley Builder’s Exchange, citizen’s groups and BIA. She implemented electronic permitting and fee justification through a nexus study, and created a permit center to address customer service needs. Ms. Christopher implemented the California state abandoned vehicle program through code enforcement. As Director, she oversaw the daily operation of the Building Department, Planning Department, and countywide Geographic Information System (GIS). In addition, Ms.

Christopher was responsible for setting the vision for the department through a new strategic plan, implementing a new coordinated approach to land use with the other land use departments, while handling a budget of $4.2 million and a staff of 46. She updated the housing elements of the General Plan with approval through HCD.

Chief Building Official / Assistant Director of Planning and Building / Permit Center Supervisor | C o u n t y o f M o n t e r e y , S a l i n a s , C A
As Chief Building Official, Ms. Christopher made technical decisions regarding federal, state, and local code interpretations. She interfaced regularly with 15 separate fire districts and implemented residential fire sprinkler installations based on ordinances. She directed the daily workload in 3 separate offices with a staff of 123. As Assistant Director, Ms. Christopher was responsible for daily operations of the Planning, Building and Administrative Divisions with a budget of over $11 million. As Permit Center Supervisor, she was responsible for creating the permit assistance team concept for the department and directly supervised building inspectors, plan check engineers, land use technicians, planners and clerical staff.

Plans Examiner | C i t y o f R o c k l i n , C A
Ms. Christopher reviewed and coordinated all plan reviews for commercial and residential projects. She provided plan check services for the building department and supervised the front building department counter. She attended meetings with architects, engineers, contractors and other city agencies and departments, and acted as building official in his absence. 9 Steven

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
Certified Building Plans Examiner,
| ICC 8103985
General Building Contractor
| 461559

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Arts, Economics
St. Olaf College, Northfield, MN
May
Principal Plans Examiner
Mr. May is a principal building plans reviewer for CSG with over 30 years of combined plan review and construction industry experience. He possesses an in-depth knowledge of California Energy Standards, principles of civil engineering with an emphasis in structural engineering, State of California accessibility standards, the California Green Building Code, and LEED.

For CSG, Mr. May provides building plan review for clients throughout the Sacramento Valley and San Francisco Bay Area, including but not limited to the Cities of Lincoln, Roseville, Modesto, Stanislaus County, Brentwood, Richmond, Pinole, Patterson, Escalon, Newman, Soledad, Los Banos, Truckee, Tracy, Anderson, San Carlos, and Counties of Placer, Sacramento, and Merced.

R E L E V A N T E X P E R I E N C E
Twelve Bridges | City of Lincoln, CA
As a plan examiner, Mr. May performed reviews of commercial and residential plans for compliance with California Code.

Single Family Dwellings | Various Agencies
Mr. May has performed building plan review of new construction, additions, and remodeling of residential houses throughout the Sacramento and Central Valleys, and the high sierra region, including the Town of Truckee and County of Placer. Projects have involved Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI) requirements.

Plans Examiner | County of Calaveras
As a plan examiner, Mr. May performed reviews of commercial and residential plans for compliance with California Code of Regulations Title 24 and for conformance with State and Federal Access Codes. Using his construction knowledge, he worked to solve design and structural issues and to develop safe, code-compliant solutions to design problems. In addition, Mr. May performed field inspections as necessary to investigate and resolve questions concerning code compliance and worked with customers to answer technical and procedural questions by phone and at the public counter.
10 Thomas

LICENSES &

CERTIFICATIONS
Certified California Residential Building
Plans Examiner
Certified California Residential Building
Inspector
Certified California Residential
Plumbing Inspector
Certified California Residential
Mechanical Inspector
Certified California Residential
Electrical Inspector
ICC 8275248
Safety Assessment Program, SAPC |
78530
Contractor’s General B License and
Electrical Classification | 652060
(inactive as of 8/1/16)
Pallinger
Senior Plans Examiner
Mr. Pallinger has over 35 years of experience in the construction field with extensive work experience as a general contractor and building inspector. He brings to the position not only extensive knowledge of the California building codes, applications and practices, but also the expertise gained from hands on construction experience in multiple trade disciplines. He exhibits excellent communication skills in performance of both plan review and inspection work and is adept at working with design professionals to address complex building regulations and code requirements.

R E L E V A N T E X P E R I E N C E
Building Inspector | CSG Client Agencies
Mr. Pallinger provides both residential and commercial building inspection services for CSG client agencies, and is currently serving the City of Manteca.

Building Inspector II/III | City of Fairfield, CA
Mr. Pallinger conducted both residential and commercial building inspections for the City of Fairfield.

Building Inspector II / Plans Examiner | Placer County, CA Mr. Pallinger conducted residential and commercial building inspections as well as plan checks on residential, commercial and multi-family dwellings. In addition, he reviewed fire sprinkler systems and hydraulic calculations for code compliance, conducted safety assessment evaluations on dilapidated and disaster damaged structures through the California Office of Emergency Services, holds in-depth knowledge of the California Energy Code including residential and non-residential compliance manuals, and is knowledgeable of the Tahoe Regional Planning Association rules and regulations and Placer county MOU’s for the Lake Tahoe region.

General and Electrical Contractor | Castlewood Construction, Auburn, CA Mr. Pallinger estimated, scheduled, monitored and inspected all work from conceptual design through project completion, ensured that all work met state and local building code requirements, supervised and managed all construction trades to ensure conformance with plan specifications, and reviewed all architectural drawings and obtained/scheduled all required building permits and inspections.

Superintendent | Alpine Construction, Napa, CA
Mr. Pallinger oversaw all aspects of daily construction activities from employees and subcontractors. He directed all aspects of the building process on both residential and commercial renovation projects including site preparation, foundations, erecting framework, cut and stack roofs and truss systems, finishing carpentry, plumbing, electrical, mechanical and drywall.
11 Phiroze

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
Professional Structural Engineer
State of California | 2020
Professional Civil Engineer
State of California | 20042
Professional General Building Contractor
State of California | 5021918
LEED Accredited Professional

EDUCATION
M.S.C.E, Structures and Soil Mechanics
University of Illinois | Urbana, Il
M.B.A, Management
Golden Gate University |
San Francisco, CA

PROFESSIONAL

AFFILIATIONS
American Society of Civil Engineers
Structural Engineers Association
of California
Earthquake Engineering
Research Institute
Applied Technology Committee
International Code Council
Wadia SE, L EED AP
Principal Structural Engineer
Mr. Wadia is a plan review engineer for CSG. He has over 40 years of experience in plan review, design and construction of residential, commercial, industrial and civil engineering projects. Mr. Wadia has expertise in the delivery of a wide range of municipal services, including:
• Plan review
• Encroachment permit application review including grading, structural, drainage and erosion control permits
• Code enforcement
• Enhancing and developing new and existing City ordinances • Supervising renovation, rehabilitation and restoration of bridges • Inspecting buildings and structures for structural integrity and condition • Investigating structural failures and inspecting repairs

R E L E V A N T E X P E R I E N C E
Mr. Wadia’s range of expertise has evolved as a result of the successful completion of a variety of projects including:
• 24 commercial buildings
• 60 residential wood frame buildings
• 32 seismic inspections, evaluations &
retrofits
• 3 bridge and over-crossings projects
• 8 post-earthquake damage assessments
• 9 offshore, modular & Arctic projects
• 4 space & defense projects
• 3 war damaged re-construction
projects
• 8 petrochemical plants
• 10 nuclear/power plants
• 8 research projects
• 5 transportation projects
• 2 telecommunications projects
Plan Review Engineer | Consultant to City of Larkspur, City of Sausalito, Town of Ross, Town of San Anselmo, CA
As Consultant to the abovementioned agencies in Marin County, Mr. Wadia performed a variety of services including plan and encroachment permit application review, inspection, code enforcement, and enhancing and developing existing and new city ordinances.

Associate | Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, San Francisco, CA As an Associate at a San Francisco architectural and engineering firm, Mr. Wadia worked closely with multidisciplinary teams on building designs from concept through construction.

He led structural engineering projects including high-rise office buildings, schools and colleges, hotels, sports stadiums, theaters, retirement communities, and shopping centers. Mr. Wadia also performed seismic inspections, evaluations, and retrofits of existing facilities.

Chief Engineer | Bechtel, San Francisco, CA
As Chief Engineer of Bechtel, Mr. Wadia was responsible for leading a group of over 200 technical personnel including architects, structural engineers, civil engineers and designers.

His work included establishing standards, reviewing technical quality, recruiting, and establishing training programs. His projects included bridges and industrial and mining facilities such refineries, oil fields, LNG plants, chemical waste treatment plants, offshore construction, modularized construction, arctic and extreme hot weather construction, space launch facilities, solar and geothermal power plants, and nuclear facilities. 12 Bounmy

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
Professional Civil Engineer
State of California | 32213
Structural Engineer
State of California | 3062
Certified Building Official

EDUCATION
Master of Science
Structural Engineering
Washington University | St. Louis, MO
Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering
UC Berkeley| Berkeley, CA
A.S., Engineering
Santa Rosa Junior College
Santa Rosa, CA

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Structural Engineers’ Association of
Northern California
California Building Officials
Soumountha SE, CBO
Senior Structural Engineer
Mr. Soumountha has over 38 years of experience in civil and structural engineering analysis, public works engineering and land development, project development review and approval, and building inspection plan review and permit services. He managed hundreds of projects in his 22 years of service at the City of Santa Clara including the 49ers Stadium, large development projects such as the Gallery at Central Park consisting of 500 plus single family and multifamily buildings and other projects worth more than 200 million dollars of all complexities in terms of fire and life safety and structural engineering systems.

R E L E V A N T E X P E R I E N C E
Permit Service Manager | City of Santa Clara, CA
Prior to joining CSG, Mr. Soumountha worked as a Permit Service Manager and managed 3 inhouse and outside consultant Plan Check Engineers who were licensed civil and structural engineers, 3 Permit Technicians, and 1 Customers’ Representative. He supported and acted on behalf of the Building Official for all functions as assigned or in the Building Official’s absence.

Senior Plans Examiner | City of Santa Clara, CA
Mr. Soumountha served as Senior Plans Examiner where he verified, reviewed, inspected and approved construction of all commercial, industrial, and residential structures in the City of Santa Clara, with an annual construction volume valued at over $500 million. His other responsibilities included: comprehensive review of all structural and life-safety aspects of building construction; providing code interpretation to inspection staff, architects and contractors; responding to city council inquiries in matters of urban planning and zoning issues; and assisting in supervision of Building Inspection staff as assigned.

City Engineer I & II | City of Santa Clara, CA
As City Engineer II, Mr. Soumountha supervised the Title Section of the Land and Property Division of the Engineering Department. Some of his responsibilities included:
• Assisting in the formation of assessment districts and redistribution of surplus assessment district funds
• Reviewing and processing agreements for developments for City departments such as Silicon Valley Powers (the City Electric Department)
• Permitting encroachments into public easements and right-of-ways • Parcel and final maps inspection for the legal subdivision of private and public properties • Preparing the Engineering Department operating budget for 5 years Structural Engineering Designer and Code Consultant | Various Jurisdictions • Since 1980, prior to his service at the City of Santa Clara, Mr. Soumountha provided structural analysis and design, consultation on construction issues, and code consulting services for numerous projects outside of City of Santa Clara jurisdiction. 13 Johnathan

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
Certified Building Official,
Certified Fire Marshal
Certified Building Plans Examiner
Certified Fire Plans Examiner
Certified Accessibility
Certified Building Inspector
Certified Fire Inspector II
Certified Residential Combination
Inspector,
|ICC 856257

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science, Public Health,
Brigham Young University Idaho
| Rexburg, ID
Associates Degree, Inspection
Technology, Valley College
San Bernardino, CA

AFFILIATIONS
ICC Certified Building Official / Fire
Marshal Exam Development
Committee
Former President of CCFPA Central
Coast Fire Prevention Officers
Past President of ICC Central Coast
Chapter
Hurst
Senior Plans Examiner
Mr. Hurst serves as a Senior Plans Examiner in the Plan Review Division of CSG Consultants. He has over 30 years of experience having served in various roles in the Building Department. To this role he brings great customer service skills and the ability to take on various tasks and responsibilities

R E L E V A N T E X P E R I E N C E
Building Official | City Arroyo Grande, CA
Mr. Hurst served as the City’s Building Official under the direction of the Fire Chief and the Community Development Director. His responsibilities included supervising all construction projects within the City. Additionally, he also performs Fire Plan Review & Inspection, and the duties of a Fire Marshal.

Senior Plans Examiner | City of Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Mr. Hurst served as a Senior Plans Examiner for the City and was under the direction of the Building Official. He was responsible for the plan review and permit issuance of all construction projects, both residential and commercial within the City limits.

Plans Examiner (Permit Technician) | County of Corona, CA As a plan examiner, Mr. Hurst issued permits, performed plans examination and conducted occasional field inspections. Additionally, he assisted with setting up the automated permit tracking system.
14 Gabriela

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
Certified Plans Examiner
Certified Accessibility Plans
Examiner/Inspector
Certified Building Inspector
Certified California Building Inspector
Certified California Commercial Inspector
Certified California Residential Inspector
| ICC 1132495
Certified Green Building Professional
| Build It Green, Oakland, CA
Green Point Advisor Single-Family &
Multi-Family New Homes
| Build It Green, Oakland, CA

EDUCATION
Master of Science in Green Building
Science
| San Francisco Institute of Architecture
Architecture/Construction Management
| Fresno State University, Fresno, CA
Architecture
| Fresno City College, Fresno, CA

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Past President & Member, San Joaquin
Valley ICC Chapter
Member, Yosemite ICC Chapter
Member, Build It Green
Member, United States Green Building
Council (USGBC) Central California
Scott
Senior Plans Examiner
Ms. Scott provides building plan check services on behalf of CSG Consultants. During her 26 years of experience in the industry, she has performed permit technician, building inspection, building plans examiner, and building official services as a city employee and a private consultant. Her plan review experience includes residential, commercial, industrial, and accessibility projects. As the Lead Permit Technician for Merced County, Ms. Scott trained all new permit technicians. Her extensive experience in building services and management make Ms. Scott an excellent addition to the CSG Team.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Senior Plans Examiner | Multiple CSG Client Agencies
Ms. Scott provided plan review services for various client agencies throughout California including the Cities of Los Banos, Sonora, Sanger, Merced, Carmel-by-the-Sea, Watsonville, Foster City, and Paso Robles as well as the Counties of Fresno and Santa Cruz.

Consulting Plans Examiner | Cities of Fresno, Paso Robles, and San Luis Obispo, CA Ms. Scott performed building plan check services for residential and commercial projects.

Building Official | City of Sanger, CA
Ms. Scott performed building official duties for the City.

Plans Examiner | Madera County, CA
Ms. Scott performed building plan check services for residential and commercial projects.

Consulting Plans Examiner | City of Lincoln and Counties of Placer. Sutter, and El Dorado Ms. Scott performed building plan check services for residential and commercial projects.

Residential Plans Examiner | City of Fresno, CA
Ms. Scott performed building plan check services for residential projects.

Plans Examiner/Permit Technician | Merced County, CA
Ms. Scott performed building plan check services for residential and commercial projects. 15 Stuart

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
Certified Building Plan Examiner
Certified Commercial Building
Inspector
|ICC 5087331
Certified Access Specialist | CASp - 872

EDUCATION
Extensive Code, Structural, and
Accessibility training through ICC,
CALBO, IAEI, NFPA, PSMJ, Access
Services Plus, and CalCasp, Inc.

AFFILIATIONS
International Code Council (ICC)
Member of National Fire Protection
Association (NFPA)
International Association of Electrical
Inspectors (IAEI)
PSMJ Resources, Inc. – Project
Management
England
Senior Plans Examiner
Mr. England serves as a Senior Plans Examiner in the Plan Review Division of CSG Consultants.

He brings over 21 years of experience having served in various roles in the Building and Engineering Departments. With considerable experience as a designer, plan reviewer, and inspector, he has a broad and deep construction knowledge and is well-suited to adapt to the everchanging landscape of construction methods and technologies. To this role he brings great project management and customer service skills, and the ability to take on various tasks and responsibilities.

R E L E V A N T E X P E R I E N C E
CSG Senior Plans Examiner | Multiple CSG Client Agencies Mr. England performed residential, multi-family, commercial, medical, industrial, structural, and agricultural plan review for a variety of CSG client agencies throughout California including:
 City of Elk Grove
 City of Lincoln
 City of Los Banos
 City of Merced
 City of Mountain View
 City of Patterson
 City of San Carlos
 County of Fresno
 County of San Joaquin
 County of Santa Cruz
 County of Tuolumne
Project Manager | Consulting Firm, Merced, CA
Mr. England served as a project manager for commercial, multi-family, industrial, and agricultural projects. He performed quality control during the plan and construction phases.

He coordinated and communicated with consultants, utility companies, contractors, and clients. His responsibilities also included plan check and site inspections for commercial, multifamily, industrial, and agricultural projects.

Plans Examiner | City of Merced, CA
Mr. England performed plan review for complex commercial, industrial, OSHPD3, multi-family, and accessibility projects. He also provided inspection services for accessibility and complex projects.

Engineering Technician IV | City of Merced, CA
Mr. England performed plan review and inspection for all utility encroachments, general encroachments, and treatment plants. He also provided multi-jurisdictional inspections and inspection services for capital improvement projects.
16 Rajesh

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
Certified Access Specialist (CASp) 711
Certified Building Official
Certified Building Plans Examiner
|ICC 8166142
CA Energy Code Compliance for NonResidential Project

EDUCATION
Master of Engineering
Andhra University
Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh
Bachelor of Engineering
Andhra University
Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh
Vangala CASp, CBO
Principal Plans Examiner
With over 12 years of experience as a Plan Check Examiner, Mr. Vangala provides a wealth of knowledge of California Building Codes to CSG. For CSG, he examines plans of commercial, industrial, and single and multi-family projects to determine compliance with the provisions of the California Building, Mechanical, electrical, Plumbing and Energy Codes, as well as OSHPD (OSHPD3). He is also adept at analyzing structural engineering aspects of all designs and calculations, evaluates test reports, and approves plans that comply with California Codes and regulations.

Mr. Vangala has also provided onsite plan review and over the counter services for the City of Foster City and the Town of Woodside.

R E L E V A N T E X P E R I E N C E
Half Moon Village Senior House | City of Half Moon Bay, CA Mr. Vangala provided performed complete building plan review services for this affordable senior housing. The 115 unit complex consisted of a 3-story multi use building, four 2-story garden apartments, and one 2-story multi use building (multi-use buildings include community room, laundry room and gym.).

Veterans Affair Outpatient Clinic | City of Marina, CA
Mr. Vangala provided complete building plan review for this integrated Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense joint health-care clinic, the first in California. This new 146,000 square foot, three-story structure will serve as a state-of-the-art medical clinic.

The facility will provide primary and specialty care to including subspecialty clinics, audiology, indoor and outdoor physical therapy, occupational therapy, a mental health center, and imaging and laboratory space. This project achieved LEED Gold certification per the LEED for Healthcare 2009 Edition.

Lincoln Centre Campus - BioMed | City of Foster City, CA Mr. Vangala provided building review of the redevelopment of an existing 280,000 square foot campus into a nearly 600,000 square foot biomedical and life science research campus.

Atria at Foster Square | City of Foster City, CA
Mr. Vangala provided building plan review of this six-story new construction building. The senior living mixed-use structure includes 155 senior living units, common space, courtyards.

Sutter Health Memorial Hospital | City of Los Banos, CA Mr. Vangala provided building plan review of this 5,153 sq.ft. single story non-residential building with $1,286,742 valuation project.

The Promontory | City of Marina, CA
Mr. Vangala provided complete building plan review for this 174 unit apartment complex. The project consisted of three new 4-story apartment buildings, as well as a 1-story clubhouse, and community center (including a 1-story clubhouse within an apartment building). The 270,000 sq. ft. project had a construction cost of $28.9 million. 17 Rick A.

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
Master Code Professional
Certified Building Official
Certified Building Code Official
Certified Building Code Specialist
Certified Plumbing Code Official
Certified Plumbing Code Specialist
Certified Fire Code Official
Certified Fire Code Specialist
Accessibility Inspector
CA Building Inspector
CA Combination Inspector
CA Combination Commercial Inspector
CA Electrical Inspector
Fire Inspector I & II
CA Mechanical Inspector
CA Plumbing Inspector
Accessibility Plans Examiner
CA Building Plans Examiner
Fire Plans Examiner
Commercial Energy Plans Examiner
|ICC 5096043
PC 832 Laws of Attest – POST Control
#2540-80102-060006
CA Governor’s Office of Emergency
Services ATC 20 - #SAPC50541
CA General Builder – Class B #556031
ACIA Registered Construction Project
Inspector – RCI Division II #6085
ICC Professional Instructor and Subject
Matter Expert
McManis CBO, MCP
Senior Plans Examiner
Mr. McManis has over 40 years of combined construction industry and building codes professional and obtained an International Code Council Master Code Professional certification. He is knowledgeable and provides exceptional communication skills both verbal and written, personnel training experience, excellent project plans/documents/specifications interpretive skills, extensive computer software skills including the development of interactive digital constructability review processes.

Prior to joining CSG, Mr. McManis has served as Chief Building Official for the City of East Palo Alto, City of King City, and County of Mono; worked as a licensed General Builder in the states of California and Nevada; a multi-prime Construction Manager for California Division of the State Architect K through 12 school construction projects; and as a Sr. Project Manager for the $1.5B Lucille Packard Children’s Hospital Expansion project in Palo Alto, CA. Additionally, Mr.

McManis has mentored and educated hundreds of Building Code Professionals through educational seminars and one-on-one training that include the CALBO Training Institute, Sacramento Valley Association of Building Officials, Cal Poly San Luis Obispo, UC East Bay, and multiple bay area educational outreach events.

R E L E V A N T E X P E R I E N C E
Master Code Professional / Senior Project Manager
Working as a collaborative partner with the Earth Design International and Per Plans Per Specs team, Mr. McManis’ responsibilities included Building Official administrative duties; planned, organized, and managed jurisdictional permitting, building inspection, plan checking [developed/implemented digital plan check policies and procedures that reduce turn-around time for permit issuance and revision reviews]; provided major input in the development, interpretation and revision of jurisdictional building ordinances; developed and recommended changes in fee schedules; served on special committees and task forces; oversaw the development and maintenance of building inspection records; and performed the most complex and sensitive building inspections.

Senior Project Manager | Cambridge CM, Inc.

Mr. McManis provided forensic analysis of defective construction installations prior to project closeouts, scheduled actualization analysis, contract enforcement, construction contractor billings analysis that included recommendations to withhold payments. He was specifically assigned to projects that are addressing delivery issues with focus on embedded interactive problem solving. These projects included Lucille Packard Children’s Hospital Expansion project in the city of Palo Alto, $1.2B Apple AC2 campus $5+B, and to assist the Vantage V5 team address project safety issues.

Chief Building Official | City of East Palo Alto, CA
Mr. McManis’ responsibilities included staff education, mentoring, and oversight of all building construction projects within the city’s jurisdiction. Projects that he interacted with directly included a new OSHPD 3 clinics, a new Menlo Fire Protection District Essential Services Fire Station, tenant build out of the 3/6-story Type I University Plaza Class A commercial facilities and represented the city as a Project Manager for the Educational Center public works project.

Mr. MaManis also developed/implemented digital plan check policies and procedures for this city that reduced turn-around time for permit issuance and revision reviews. 18 Mark

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
Building Plans Examiner
California Residential Building Inspector
| ICC 8020632
Cal OES Post Disaster
| 37607
OSFM Fire Inspector 1A & 1B

EDUCATION
Building Codes, General Studies
| Cuesta College, San Luis Obispo, CA
Building Codes, General Studies
| Alan Hancock College, Santa Maria, CA

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Past President & Member, San Joaquin
Valley ICC Chapter
Member, Yosemite ICC Chapter
Member, Build It Green
Member, United States Green Building
Council (USGBC) Central California
Sadowski
Senior Plans Examiner
Mr. Sadowski is a Senior Plans Examiner for CSG and brings over 13 years of experience in the building industry. He has served as a building maintenance worker, a building inspector and as the Building and Safety Supervisor for the City of San Luis Obispo. To this role, Mr. Sadowski brings excellent customer service and communication skills.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Building and Safety Supervisor | City of San Luis Obispo, CA Mr. Sadowski oversaw the City’s Building and Safety Division and provided supervision to the plan review and inspection staff. He reviewed, interpreted, and enforced provisions of adopted state and federal codes, and local ordinances. He also conducted plan review and served as the Division’s representative for the Development Review Team when processing planning applications.

Additionally, Mr. Sadowski served as the building code technical advisor for code enforcement staff and code cases.

Building Inspector | City of San Luis Obispo, CA
As a Building Inspector for the City, Mr. Sadowski conducted inspections during to ensure compliance with their respective approved plans, applicable building codes, and local ordinances. He assisted contractors, property owners, and residents reach agreeable solutions to various code, zoning, and local ordinance violations. He also coordinated multi-department and multi-agency inspections.

Building Maintenance Worker II | City of San Luis Obispo, CA Mr. Sadowski performed specialized maintenance and repair of electrical, plumbing, and mechanical systems throughout City facilities.
19 Randy

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
Certified ICC B2 Commercial Building
Inspector
Certified ICC B3 Commercial Plans
Examiner
General Contractor | 941173
Certified Welding MAW/TIG

EDUCATION
Construction Trade Tech
American River College | Sacramento, CA
Conley
Senior Building Inspector
Mr. Conley serves as a Senior Building Inspector for CSG and its clients. He has extensive experience inspecting commercial and residential buildings in various stages of construction and remodeling to ensure compliance with all applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations. He has also examined plans and specifications for new construction, additions, and alterations for residential and commercial buildings to determine code compliance. Additionally, he has over 30 years of construction experience associated with commercial and residential buildings.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Building Plans Examiner & Inspector | Calaveras County, CA Mr. Conley reviewed commercial, residential, and industrial plans to determine compliance with local, state, national building codes as well as fire codes. In addition, he performed inspections of commercial and residential buildings for building code compliance.

Special inspector | Consolidated Engineering Laboratories, San Ramon, CA Mr. Conley performed calculations relative to inspection requirements to ensure that procedures and materials conform to contract documents and applicable building and fire codes.

General Contractor (SoleOwner) | R G C o n l e y C o n s t r u c t i o n , C A Mr. Conley supervised building projects from inception through completion, including preparation of timetablesfor all phases of projectsto ensure completion dates were met; estimated the costs of materials and staffing; and met with owners, architects, and engineers to review building, zoning, and energy requirements for projects.

Independent Inspector (Sole Owner) | Gold Country Inspections, CA Mr. Conley performed inspections for commercial buildings, residentials, mobile homes, pools, and other structures to determine compliance with local, state, national building codes as well as fire codes. He also inspected for proper installation and use of materials and recommended methods for correction, and answered questions regarding the inspections.

Journey Level Carpenter | United Brotherhood of Carpenters Mr. Conley had increasing responsibilities ranging from general superintendent to journey level carpenter in commercial and residential construction. He supervised, organized, and assigned work and made sure all work wasin compliance with building codes. 20 Joshua

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
California Residential Building Inspector
Residential Electrical Inspection
California Residential Plumbing Inspector
California Commercial Plumbing Inspector
California Residential Electrical Inspector
California Residential Mechanical
Inspector
California Residential Combination
Inspector
Permit Technician
| ICC 8488174

EDUCATION
General Education
Fresno State University | Fresno, CA
Building Inspection on the Job Training
CSG Academy | Newman, CA
Laupua
Building Inspector
Mr. Laupua serves as a Building Inspector for CSG Consultants. He has proven excellent customer service skills as well as strong organizational and prioritization skills. Mr. Laupua currently provides inspection services to the Cities of Newman, Gustine, Los Banos and Patterson. He has a complete understanding of the building department process and can help customers over the counter and on the phone. I addition, Mr. Laupua is capable of issuing building permits and performing small over the counter plan reviews.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Building Inspector | San Joaquin County, Stanislaus County, City of Modesto, Atwater, Patterson, Gustine and Newman
Mr. Laupua has performed building inspections from the ground up for residential projects throughout the CSG client cities and light commercial.

CSG Academy Training | CSG Consultants—Central Valley, CA As a trainee, Mr. Laupua has learned the sequence and procedure of building inspections become familiar with the codes concentrating on Chapter 3 of the CBC. He has shadowed and mentored CSG inspectors to develop field techniques, become familiar with the layout of plans and documents including “approved” job site plans, has a solid understanding of how building departments function, and understands different city/ county ordinances and how they work with the codes. He is also able to issue permits through CSG’s GreenVue permitting system.

Farmer Assistant | Highland Labradors Kennels, Gustine, CA Mr. Laupua’s responsibilities included farm facility maintenance while tending to livestock.

Tractor Driver | Kegles Custom Farming, Gustine, CA
Mr. Laupua’s responsibilities included all aspects of farm work and tractor driving on property.

Maintenance Assistant | Needmore Farms, Gustine, CA
Mr. Laupua provided farm facilities maintenance on an apricot orchard and irrigation systems located on the property.
21 Mike

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
Certified Building Official CB
Building Plans Examiner B3
Building Code Specialist B8
Commercial Combination Inspector C5
Electrical Inspector E5
Combination Inspector C8
Mechanical Inspector M5
Plumbing Inspector P5
Commercial Electrical Inspector E2
Building Inspector B5
Residential Inspector E1

EDUCATION
AA Degree in Construction Technology
Ventura College
Ventura, CA
Leach CBO
Senior Building Inspector

R E L E V A N T E X P E R I E N C E
Senior Building Inspector | Multiple CSG Clients
Mr. Leach provides combination inspections for single family residential, commercial, institutional, industrial, and multi-family structures for several CSG clients including Stockton, Mill Valley, Placer County, and throughout the County of Napa. Duties include new residential, commercial, and industrial as well as remodels / additions and tenant improvements to both residential and commercial occupancies.

Chief Building Official | City of Santa Paula, CA
Mr. Leach was responsible for the overall administration and supervision of the Building and Safety and Code Enforcement Departments. Mr. Leach oversaw staff, payroll, evaluations, and customer service for this departments. Some of his responsibilities included review of plans for code compliance prior to permit issuance, collaboration with other city departments to expedite developments, directed the implementation for the recent fee update, code adoption and budget, and helped design and implement a COVID 19 permit issuance and inspection program.

Supervising Inspector | City of Santa Paula, CA
Mr. Leach was responsible for the day-to-day inspections performed by field inspection staff and reporting to the Building Official. Mr. Leach tasks included acting as a lead inspector on more complex projects such as the City’s Water recycling Facility, and a multistory apartment complex with a parking garage. He also performed a limited amount of plan review on regular, light-framed construction.

Building Inspector II | City of Santa Paula, CA
Mr. Leach was responsible both commercial and industrial area inspections under the direction of the Supervising Inspector for new construction. He was also responsible for code enforcement in commercial and industrial properties and enforcement on uninhabitable residential dwellings and property maintenance. 22 Heath

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
Certified Building Inspector
CA Residential Building Inspector
| ICC 5055210
General Contractor B-1 License | #378222
American Concrete Institute, Concrete
Filed Testing Technician
Construction Quality Management for
Contractors, USACE RMS/QCS
30 Hour OSHA, 2010
FEMA | Hurricane: Preparedness and
Response
FEMA | Hurricane: Recovery and
Mitigation

EDUCATION
Certificate of Completion, Construction
Management | California State
University, Chico | Chico, CA

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
International Code Council
American Concrete Institute
Steel Bridge Team
|CSU Long Beach
Engineers Without Borders
| CSU Long Beach Chapter
Immer
Senior Building Inspector
Mr. Immer has over 36 years of experience in the construction and building inspection fields.

He is an ICC Certified Building Inspector, as well as a licensed General Building Contract and ACI Certified Concrete Testing Technician. Mr. Immer has extensive experience from conceptual design through the construction phase of both new and existing commercial, industrial, residential, and multi-family housing projects, and a comprehensive background in the technical aspects of architecture and construction—providing the knowledge to perform in-depth analysis from project reviews, on & off-site construction and inspections, and ADA compliance through completion of projects.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Consulting Building Inspector II | City of Daly City
Mr. Immer provided combination inspections for single family residential, commercial, institutional, industrial, multi-family structures throughout the City of Daly City. Duties included follow up inspections of assigned code enforcement cases as well as all new and existing remodels / additions and tenant improvements to both residential and commercial occupancies.

Building Inspector II | City of San Mateo, CA
Mr. Immer provided combination inspections for single family residential, commercial, institutional, industrial, and multi-family structures throughout the City of San Mateo. Duties included follow up inspections of assigned code enforcement cases as well as all new and existing remodels / additions and tenant improvements to both residential and commercial occupancies.

Consulting Senior Engineering Technician - Inspector of Record | US Air Force Mr. Immer served as the Inspector of Record/Quality Control/Engineering Technician for the United States Air Force. Duties included constant daily monitoring and inspections during the construction of the Para Jumpers Training Facility at Moffett Airfield in Mountain View, CA. He also provided daily inspection reports and attended preparatory meetings for specified sections of work to be performed.

Supervising/Building Inspector IV | City of Sacramento, CA Mr. Immer served as Building Inspector III and IV for the City of Sacramento over the course of seven years. Primary duties included conducting inspections, performing plan reviews, issuing permits, and issuing citations for non-compliant work performed. In addition, as Building Inspector IV, Mr. Immer supervised all structural building inspectors for commercial and residential projects.
23 James

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
832 P.C. Arrest, Search, and Seizure
P.O.S.T. Level 1 Basic Law
Enforcement
FEMA CertIS-00100.b – Introduction
to Incident Command System
FEMA CertIS-00200.b – ICS for Single
Resources and Initial Action Incident
FEMA CertIS-00700.a – National
Incident Management System (NIMS)
TEEX Cert AWR-160 Terrorism Awareness
for Emergency Responders
TEEX Cert Operational Level Response to
HAZMAT/WMD Incidents
Jonte
Code Enforcement Officer I
Mr. Jonte is Code Enforcement Officer for CSG Consultants and brings over 8 years of investigative experience. He brings to the code enforcement role excellent communication, leadership and interpersonal skills and the ability to handle a wide variety of cases.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
CSG Code Enforcement Officer | County of San Joaquin and City of Hercules, CA Mr. Jonte serves as a code enforcement officer for the County of San Joaquin and the City of Hercules.

Owner/Operator/Flooring Contractor | Jonte’s Custom Flooring, Winters, CA Mr. Jonte managed residential and commercial installation and repair of carpet, vinyl, VCT tile, laminate, and prefinished hardwood. He also ordered materials and addressed client concerns to ensure satisfaction.

Squad Leader/Team Leader/ MP Sergeant E-5 | 270th Military Police Co., California Army National Guard
Mr. Jonte engaged and performed Military Police duties such as convoy security, garrison security, personal security, and basic law enforcement duties, including riot control. He enforced U.S. Army UCMJ Regulations and Codes of Conduct and ensured health, safety, and military discipline. Mr. Jonte also provided leadership to 8 to 15 soldiers.

Public Safety Officer | University of the Pacific, Stockton, CA Mr. Jonte protected and served UOP student, staff, and guests. He patrolled UOP campus buildings, parking lots, and areas of interest and enforced California Penal Codes, Traffic Laws, and Regulations. He observed and reported acts of UOP policy misconduct and maintained detailed daily logs and reports.

Assistant Investigator | Soldier Incentives Assistance Center (SIAC) – Incentives Task Force, California Army National Guard
Mr. Jonte conducted investigations for bonus incentives fraud and abuse. He interviewed personnel under investigation and conducted inquiries into subject and personnel military records, emails, addresses, and phone numbers. Mr. Jonte also submitted findings of investigation for further legal charges, discipline, and recoupment of monetary funds paid.

Homeland Response Force FEMA Region 9, HRF Logistics NCO/HRF Training NCO/HRF Planner | 270th Military Police Co., California Army National Guard Mr. Jonte coordinated, arranged, and executed supply and logistical support to a natural disaster or to a nuclear, biological, chemical terrorist attack. He maintained HRF vehicles, equipment, and inventory. Mr. Jonte also submitted weekly and monthly reports for GSA and hazmat equipment and coordinated hazmat personnel training.

Project Manager | Floor Coverings International
Mr. Jonte oversaw client jobs and remedied project problems to ensure customer satisfaction.

CSG SOQ TO THE CITY OF ANGELS

BUILDING OFFICIAL / INSPECTOR SERVICES
24 ConsultantQualifications & References

AP P R O A C H T O W O R K
CSG’s proposed team has been selected to best support the specific needs of the City and will deliver the highest level of service through its application of technical expertise, knowledge of the City’s processes and procedures, efficient and effective customer care, and application of code compliance combined with innovative and helpful alternatives. Our extensive experience in furnishing comprehensive building and fire life safety services to the City provides a consistent, strong technical foundation to all projects. From providing leading-edge digital plan review and online plan check status reporting to delivering faster-thanscheduled turnaround times and code interpretations, CSG will deliver the highest quality services to the City of Angels. CSG’s approach to work includes the following methodologies and key benefits:
 A wealth of fully committed and qualified personnel. We maintain staff that is fully licensed and certified at the highest level of industry standards. To keep our personnel on the industry’s leading edge, many serve as instructors and lecturers and sit on boards and committees for organizations developing and implementing important code regulations. We also keep current with the latest in procedures and use of products.
 Customized, responsive services. We are skilled at assessing time commitments, developing accurate work plans and applying dedicated, professional personnel with the skills and experience best-suited for the project. We can quickly fine-tune staffing levels to match or adjust to changes in plan review and inspection, to ensure responsiveness to customers. With our digital plan review capabilities, we are able to utilize plan review resources from any of our regional offices. In addition, we excel at coordinating with all agency departments as well as outside agencies.  Rapid turnarounds and expedited services. With extensive experience in both code application and the digital plan review process, our staff excels at performing expeditious turnarounds while delivering thorough and accurate reviews. We easily match and more often beat any required review turnaround deadlines.
 Leading-edge, cost-saving technology and methods. CSG delivers a suite of digital options— speedy digital plan reviews and electronic versions of plan comments; an easy-to-use online application for plan submittal, tracking and approval of digital plans; and available full scanning and archiving services. In addition, through knowledge gained from service to over 250 public agencies, we are constantly improving and adapting to provide our clients with the most cost-effective services.  Environmentally friendly practices. Our corporate policy on sustainability supports a healthy environment, reduces our carbon footprint and promotes environmental stewardship through environmentally preferable purchasing and other actions including use of a digital plan review system that bypasses paper consumption, and use of duplexing and recycled, post-consumer content paper when printing is necessary.

SEC TION 3

CSG SOQ TO THE CITY OF ANGELS

BUILDING OFFICIAL / INSPECTOR SERVICES
25 B U I L DI N G O F F I C I AL S E R VI C E S
CSG’s Building Officials are certified and have extensive building industry experience. They have the proven skills, technical knowledge and a well-rounded approach to performing Building Division administration and providing management oversight and direction to plan reviewers, inspectors, and permit technicians. Our Building Officials are well-known for their consummate customer service skills and successful identification of solutions through innovative problem solving. They can be available full-time or part-time as needed.

CSG’s Building Officials have expertise in providing the following services and can easily adapt to other requests as needed:
 Building Official Administration, including addressing complex Building Code issues, code interpretation, and resolution of inquiries and complaints  Rapidly familiarizing themselves with local code amendments  Applying knowledge of all aspects of the California Building Codes and local amendments  Making determinations on the approval and use of alternative materials and methods  Staying abreast of ongoing changes to applicable state and federal laws through long-standing industry relationships and associations
 Providing technical assistance and educating stakeholders  Building and maintaining relationships with other departments and agencies  Participating in pre-development reviews and providing comments  Processing Planning Commission and Council staff reports  Attending Planning Commission and Council meetings

B U I L DI N G P L A N R E V I E W S ER V I C E S
Our team of professionals is ready to assist in all aspects of plan review and to focus on the special needs and requirements of each of our clients. We pledge thorough and accurate reviews and prompt turnaround times and offer proven digital plan review services and comprehensive online status reports. CSG serves as an active partner, working as a seamless extension of our public agency clients in performing the requested services and working closely with the development community and public as directed.

Compliance Standards
Our engineers and plan reviewers carefully review all plans and documents for compliance with building codes, fire codes, energy conservation standards, and accessibility regulations adopted by the State of California, and all local policies and ordinances including but not limited to:
 California Building Code, Volumes 1 and 2
 California Residential Code
 California Electrical Code
 California Plumbing Code
 California Mechanical Code
 California Fire Code
 California Energy Code
 California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen)
 California Existing Building Code
 California Health and Safety Code
 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standards as adopted and referenced by the State of California (California Code of Regulations, Title-19)
 State Historical Building Code
 NPDES/WQMP/SWPPP Compliance
 Local adopted ordinances and amendments relative to building, fire and municipal codes, including project Conditions of Approval from other agency departments, divisions, and regulating agencies

CSG SOQ TO THE CITY OF ANGELS

BUILDING OFFICIAL / INSPECTOR SERVICES
26 Digital Plan Review
CSG has been providing digital plan
review services for over 20 years,
leading the consultant field with this
ground-breaking service. All paper plans
submitted to CSG for building and fire
plan review are immediately scanned
into digital files and stored on CSG’s
servers for quick and easy access by both our clients and our plan reviewers.

Our plan reviewers furnish electronic versions of their plan comments conforming to each client’s established correction list templates. Any additional forms utilized by the agency will be incorporated into the correction comments and returned with the appropriate recommendations. Plan check comments can be delivered electronically by email or other agency-approved means, enabling staff to immediately modify CSG’s checklist for incorporation with other department comments. We provide convenient, environmentally friendly digital storage of all construction-related documents, and on request, can provide clients with a set of digitally scanned plans at no additional cost.

In addition, for jurisdictions requesting a pure digital plan review workflow, we can enable an applicant to submit digital files—with no size limitations—directly to CSG via our web-based application. Our application includes an online portal for the applicant/jurisdiction to retrieve comments and marked-up digital plans including redlines. Importantly, this service tracks the status of all submittals and re-submittals until the plans have been approved.

Key features of our digital plan review service include:
 Efficient. Plans are pushed to plan review staff the same day they are received.
 User-friendly. CSG developed its own online portal specifically to manage the electronic file submittal process. Through use of this interface, the applicant is no longer faced with size restrictions on email attachments or required to learn complex file transfer settings.  Proven. We have provided a digital plan review option to our clients for over 20 years.
 Non-Proprietary. CSG’s electronic review process is 100% PDF-based with no additional software required to view redlines.

Online Plan Check Status
CSG offers a convenient service allowing clients to check plan review status and comments online. By accessing our secure Plan Check Status website, agency staff as well as authorized applicants can view their project documents and plans and communicate with the specific plan checker via e-mail. Staff and authorized applicants can download comments upon completion of the plan check. There is no additional cost for this service.

Plans Pickup and Delivery
CSG will coordinate pickup and delivery of plans and other materials from/to the agency via CSG personnel or an approved alternative service upon request from the City.

All paper plans
submitted to CSG
are immediately
scanned into digital
files for quick and
easy access by our
clients and plan
reviewers.

Leading the field in
digital plan review
services for over 20
years.

CSG SOQ TO THE CITY OF ANGELS

BUILDING OFFICIAL / INSPECTOR SERVICES
27 CASp Plan Review Services
We understand California Building Departments are required to have CASp certified staff in place and available for technical questions and interpretations. Our CASp certified team members are knowledgeable of state and federal accessibility laws and regulations and possess the expertise necessary to promote access to facilities for persons with disabilities. In accordance with current regulations, CSG can provide CASp certified professionals to review plans for accessibility and to facilitate compliance with regulations.

Green Building and LEED Accreditation
Our Building Division team is experienced in plan review and inspection for compliance with CALGreen and local green building ordinances and includes LEED Accredited Professionals. In addition, CSG Consultants has the qualifications necessary to assist with both the development of policy and the implementation of green and sustainable building practices. CSG’s Sustainability Programs division can assist, for example, with construction and demolition debris recycling programs and public outreach to the building industry.

OSHPD 3 Reviews
Our professional engineers and certified plans examiners are well-versed in the differences between CBC and OSHPD 3 facilities and have successfully completed OSHPD 3 plan reviews for multiple client agencies.

PL AN C HEC K T URNAROU ND TI MES
CSG strives to provide the highest quality and most timely service in the industry. We take pride in maintaining the requested plan review times for all our clients—even delivering faster than our own deadlines. Our goal is to approve code-complying projects and to move work quickly and successfully through jurisdictional processes. CSG will ensure that all building and safety duties and follow-up actions will be performed in a timely and responsive manner.

The following are CSG’s proposed plan check turnaround times:

TYPE OF REVIEW INITIAL REVIEW
(BUSINESS DAYS)2

RE-CHECK
(BUSINESS DAYS)2
Residential New Construction 10 5
Residential Additions 10 5
Small Residential Remodels 10 5
Commercial New Construction & Large/Complex Projects1 10 5 Commercial Additions 10 5
Small Commercial Remodels/Tenant Improvements 10 5
Expedited 5 5
1Turnaround time may vary with the complexity and magnitude of the project. If a review is anticipated to take longer than the maximum turnaround time, CSG will notify the City’s representative and negotiate additional time required to ensure an appropriate level of review. 2 The number of working days associated with the plan check turnaround time is based on time of project submittal. The first working day will be the day the project is received by CSG if submitted by 3:00 PM. For a project that is received by CSG after 3:00 PM, the first working day will be the next business day.

Expedited Plan Check Services
At the City’s request, we can perform plan check services on an accelerated schedule based on the fees indicated in our fee schedule.

CSG SOQ TO THE CITY OF ANGELS

BUILDING OFFICIAL / INSPECTOR SERVICES
28 B U I L DI N G I NS P E CT I O N S E RV I C E S
CSG provides fully integrated, multidisciplined building inspection services for residential, commercial, and
industrial projects. Our inspection
personnel have an outstanding mixture
of technical expertise and experience
in all construction types. We provide
experienced, ICC certified inspectors
who work with a team approach to
ensure compliance with applicable codes and requirements and provide solutions to mitigate potential risks and safety hazards. Using well-honed customer service and communication skills our inspectors excel at educating stakeholders to keep projects moving forward. Our inspectors also utilize current technologies and equipment to view plans and documents, research related code requirements, document field conditions and progress, and share that information with stakeholders while in the field.

Key services include but are not limited to the following:
 Providing inspection services to ensure project compliance with State adopted codes and local amendments including building, electrical, mechanical and plumbing codes
 Offering code interpretation and education
 Seamlessly integrating into client organizations and consistently enforcing policies and procedures
 Addressing and resolving inquiries
 Maintaining records and files
 Providing all vehicles, fuel, maintenance and other equipment necessary for inspectors to carry out duties.

CASp Consultation Services
To facilitate the City’s compliance with current rules and regulations, CSG will provide a CASp certified professional for technical questions and interpretations and to perform accessibility compliance inspections upon request.

CSG provides all
vehicles, fuel,
maintenance, and
other equipment
necessary for
inspectors to carry
out duties, with no
additional charges.

CSG offers virtual
inspections utilizing
Google Duo,
FaceTime, Skype, MS
Teams or other
agency-preferred
platform.

CSG SOQ TO THE CITY OF ANGELS

BUILDING OFFICIAL / INSPECTOR SERVICES
29 PERMIT TEC HNI CI AN SERVI CES
CSG has highly qualified staff available to provide Permit Technician services.

These frontline, first-response services are vital to the success of the entire building and safety permit process as they often set the tone for the applicant whether a homeowner, contractor, or design professional. CSG handpicks exceptionally qualified personnel who can function as seamless extensions of the agency’s team, understand the importance of exemplary customer service, and have knowledge of the inner workings of building departments and thorough familiarity with the building application and permit process.

CSG's permit processing staff is trained in customer service and helping to facilitate and expedite the permit process. Our staff members can perform quick assessments of each customer’s needs and ensure that they are served appropriately. They are familiar with State Contractors License Law and ensure that permits are issued to properly licensed contractors. CSG’s permit technicians are also familiar with multiple permit software systems and will quickly gain proficiency with the software that has been customized for the City.

Our staff is knowledgeable and experienced with permit processing functions including:
 Providing the public with appropriate forms and handouts  Processing permit applications and issuing permits using the City’s software  Accepting plans, documents, structural calculations and energy reports for permit processing  Routing plans to building and other departments and agencies  Performing document control, ensuring permit file integrity, and maintaining status of plans and documents during the permit process.
 Preparing plan check letters to be sent to applicants  Assisting the public with completing applications and other required forms  Preparing documents and reports; providing permit record materials requested from the public; researching and compiling documents for compliance with Public Records Act (PRA) requests.

C O D E E N F O R C E M EN T S E R V I C E S
CSG maintains experienced Code Enforcement Officers who are fully trained, licensed and certified through the California Association of Code Enforcement Officers (CACEO) and the National Environmental Health Association (NEHA) for any code enforcement or health and safety challenge presented.

Code Enforcement Supervision
CSG can provide interim staffing to oversee an agency’s code enforcement personnel and day-to-day activities, ensuring, for example that procedures are followed, caseloads are managed effectively, and that code enforcement officers work fairly and consistently with property owners and reporting parties. Our personnel are adept at serving as liaisons for Code Enforcement units when interacting with members of other departments. CSG Code Enforcement Managers may be called upon to attend department meetings, committee meetings and City Council meetings as a code enforcement program progresses. They can be also available to assist code enforcement officers, law enforcement, and other City staff as well as representatives of other agencies on field visits when needed.

In addition, CSG personnel can review existing code enforcement programs—look for efficiencies and help establish appropriate policies and procedures to facilitate the mission of the code enforcement unit.

CSG SOQ TO THE CITY OF ANGELS

BUILDING OFFICIAL / INSPECTOR SERVICES
30 Code Enforcement Services
CSG’s Code Enforcement Officers work to identify code violations and engage stakeholders and responsible parties to correct code violations consistent with municipal and state codes tailored to the specific needs of the agency. Examples of codes and ordinances enforced include:
 Zoning codes
 Building codes
 Housing codes
 Public nuisance codes
 State health & safety codes
 Special concerns such as work and safety regulations, short term rental enforcement, massage and human trafficking, and marijuana dispensaries
Our Code Enforcement Officers have extensive experience and skills in the following key areas:
 Code enforcement program review and analysis
 Code enforcement inspections
 Preparing administrative remedies including administrative citations  Conducting administrative hearings
 Preparing program documentation and reports as well as committee and council presentations  Testifying on behalf of clients in criminal court
 License and permit application review and processing
 Coordination of activities with multiple departments including Building, Planning, Community Development, Police and City Attorneys
 Providing information on municipal regulations to property owners, residents, businesses, the public, as well as to agency departments and divisions
Although a majority of our results are gained by voluntary compliance, our services include a full range of code enforcement activities, including:
 Enforcing administrative abatements and managing receiverships  Testifying in public hearings and court proceedings on behalf of the agency  Facilitating settlement agreements
 Recommending changes to municipal codes
 Appearing as expert witnesses in administrative, civil, or criminal venues

CSG SOQ TO THE CITY OF ANGELS

BUILDING OFFICIAL / INSPECTOR SERVICES
31 AVAIL ABILIT Y AND C UST OMER SERVI CE
We clearly understand the importance of our role in the success of the City and commit to providing project stakeholders and City staff with the highest level of service while functioning as a seamless extension of the City. We believe effective communication, responsiveness and an intense focus on customer service are essential to developing and continuing a successful working relationship between City staff, project stakeholders and CSG’s team members.

Office Hours and Meeting Availability
Plan Review
CSG plan checkers are available for inquiries anytime during normal business hours via phone or email, Monday through Friday. Our plan checkers can typically respond to the City for all questions or requests generated during any plan review on the same day, but no later than the following day a request is received.

To assist the City, we can also meet in-person with City staff and project stakeholders or can utilize video conferencing with all parties involved. We recognize the value of pre-design consultation with prospective applicants and are available to provide this service as well. Our designated Project Manager and/or technical staff will be available in-person for consultation and meetings with a reasonable lead time.

Inspection
CSG inspectors can be ready to provide services upon request to CSG’s designated project manager. We are flexible and can alter our hours to meet the City’s needs. Evening and weekend inspections for special construction needs can be accommodated with sufficient notice. CSG staff can typically respond to the City for all questions or requests generated during field inspections on the same day, but no later than the following day a request is received.

Additional Building Department Staffing
CSG building support staff, including permit technicians and building officials, can be ready to provide services upon request from the City.

Code Enforcement
CSG Code Enforcement Officers are available within normal working hours and at various times outside of these hours based on the needs of case investigation.

We recognize the
value of pre-design
consultation and are
available to provide
this important
service.

CSG SOQ TO THE CITY OF ANGELS

BUILDING OFFICIAL / INSPECTOR SERVICES
32 C OMMIT MENT TO EXC ELL ENC E
Our People
Our clients benefit from the expertise of our team members who hold a wide variety of project experiences and are motivated to achieve the highest level of technical proficiency and certification. Knowing technical excellence is vital to successful service to our clients and to meeting their jurisdictions’ level of safety and code compliance, our team members are ICC certified, include registered engineers, and possess additional required professional certifications. They routinely update their knowledge and skills through attendance of specialized training classes and continuing certification seminars in the most current building codes and standards as well as approved and modern methods, materials, tools and safety practices used in the industry. In addition, we understand that integrity, responsive customer service, and excellent communication and interpersonal skills are critical to on-the-job success, and we actively seek these qualities in our team members.

We also support our team members in their participation in and contributions to the many important associations and organizations within our industry. Many of our team members hold or have held key positions within the organizations listed below and have served as in-demand instructors and trainers.

League of California Cities
International Code Council
California Building Officials
County Building Officials Association of California
ICC Chapters of Napa-Solano, Peninsula, East Bay,
Monterey, Sacramento Valley, Yosemite, Shasta
Cascade, Central Coast, Redwood Empire, Los
Angeles Basin, Orange Empire, Foothill, Coachella
Certified Access Specialist Institute (CASI)
California Fire Chiefs Association
Northern California Fire Prevention Officers
Southern California Fire Prevention Officers
National Fire Protection Association
California Automatic Fire Alarm Association
American Fire Sprinkler Association
National Fire Sprinkler Association
American Public Works Association
American Society of Safety Engineers (ASSE)
Institute of Transportation Engineers
Structural Engineers Association of Northern California Structural Engineers Association of Southern California Quality Assurance
Key to our approach to quality assurance is that it must occur throughout the entirety of the project and with the right people involved every step of the way. Our team’s unwavering integrity and commitment are combined with our internal processes and leading-edge digital technology to consistently produce quality work products and maintain highly satisfied clients. At project outset, CSG’s project manager assigns the most technically specialized team members who, through their experience and training, best understand the needs of our client. Our quality control processes include verifying procedures and code requirements, defining and applying standards used in code applications, and assessing work products to ensure that jurisdictional requirements and expectations are met.

CSG SOQ TO THE CITY OF ANGELS

BUILDING OFFICIAL / INSPECTOR SERVICES
33 R E F E R E N C E S
CSG currently provides services to more than 200 clients throughout California. Our track record of success with our clients is outstanding and we encourage you to contact our references with any questions or clarification you might require. The following is a partial list of regional references for which CSG has provided similar services as those requested by the City. Project budgets and additional information can be provided upon request from the City.

Building Services References
City of Sonora
Rachelle Kellogg, Community Development Director
94 Washington Street
Sonora, CA 95370
(209) 532-4541
[email protected]
2015 – Ongoing
County of Tuolumne
Brian Bell, Chief Building Official
2 South Green Street
Sonora, CA 95370-4618
(209) 533-5546
[email protected]
2018 – Ongoing
City of Kerman
John Jansons, City Manager
850 South Madera Avenue
Kerman, CA 93630
(559) 846-9387
[email protected]
2020 – Ongoing
City of Patterson
Ken Irwin, City Manager
1 Plaza Circle
Patterson, CA 95363
(209) 895-8033
[email protected]
2014 – Ongoing
County of Fresno
Dan Mather, Chief Building Inspector
2220 Tulare Street, 6th Floor
Fresno, CA 93721
(559) 600-4560
[email protected]
2018 – Ongoing
Code Enforcement References
County of San Joaquin
Marcel Marin & Juanita Huerta, Acting Code
Enforcement Managers
1810 E. Hazelton Avenue
Stockton, CA 95205
(209) 468-3141
[email protected]
2021 – Ongoing
City of Fullerton
Guillermina Torrico, Code Enforcement Supervisor
70 N. First Street
Campbell, CA 95008
(714) 738-5377
[email protected]
2019 – Ongoing
City of Marina
Dan Paulini, Chief Building Official
209 Cypress Avenue
Marina, CA 93933
(831) 884-1285
[email protected]
2007 – Ongoing
Town of Loomis
Sean Rabe, Town Manager
3665 Taylor Road
Loomis, CA 95650
(916) 652-1840
[email protected]
2018 – Ongoing

CSG SOQ TO THE CITY OF ANGELS

BUILDING OFFICIAL / INSPECTOR SERVICES
34 B U I L DI N G P L A N R E V I E W & I N S P E C T I O N P R O J E C T E X A MP L E S The following is a small sampling of projects for which CSG has performed services similar to those requested by the City.

STERLING MEADOWS | CITY OF ELK GROVE, CA
Building Plan Review & Inspection
CSG provided building plan review and inspection for the Sterling Meadows projects which consists of 200 acres located on the north side of Kammerer Road approximately one-half mile west of Grant Line Road. The development allows for 1,184 Single Family residence, including two park sites totaling 18.5 acres. This phased project is currently under construction.

TOWNEPLACE SUITES & HOTEL | CITY OF ELK GROVE, CA
Building Plan Review & Inspection
CSG provided building plan review and inspection for the four-story, 112 room, 63,560 square foot hotel. The project valuation was $8 million dollars.

GREAT WOLF LODGE | CITY OF MANTECA, CA
Building and Fire Inspection, RFI Review
CSG provides all on-site building and fire inspections for this complex comprising a 510,000-square foot, 6-story, 500 room hotel; a 45,000 square foot family
entertainment center; and a massive water park
consisting of multiple 6-story water slides that start in the interior of the building, extend to the exterior, and then return to the interior. CSG’s project manager provides on-site oversight as well as all RFI reviews for this 18- 20 month project. Depending on the project’s needs, CSG provides 2-4 full-time building and fire inspectors whose services include providing daily and weekly inspection reports.

MULTIPLE MASTER SUBDIVISIONS | CITY OF LINCOLN, CA
Building Plan Review and Inspection
CSG provided building plan review and inspection on multiple residential developments in the City of Lincoln.

These included the following projects:
• Twelve Bridges by Taylor Morrison, a 308-unit development • Revere by Richmond American, a 122-unit development
• Turkey Creek Estates by Elliott Homes, an 824-unit development • Piamonte for Woodside Homes
NEW SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES | CLIENT AGENCIES THROUGHOUT CA Building Plan Review, Building Inspection, Engineering Review, Construction Inspection
From new construction to bathroom remodels, CSG has performed thousands of building and fire life safety plan reviews, engineering reviews, building inspections and construction inspections of singlefamily residences for our client agencies throughout California and Nevada.

CSG SOQ TO THE CITY OF ANGELS

BUILDING OFFICIAL / INSPECTOR SERVICES
35 PILOT FLYING J TRAVEL CENTER | CITY OF PATTERSON, CA Building Plan Review, Building Inspection
CSG performed building plan review and inspection for this new 15,951SF Type VB (unprotected, fully sprinklered) structure with Type IIB fueling island canopies. The project is valued at $1,400,000. The structure includes a convenience store, PJ Fresh Market, Wendy’s Restaurant, shower facilities, 10 gas islands (2 RV) and 9 diesel lanes.

STONEGATE VILLAGE SELF HELP APARTMENTS | CITY OF PATTERSON, CA Building Plan Review, Building Inspection
CSG performed building plan review and inspection for this new 171,937 SF, $13,500,000 multifamily project.

The project comprises 22 two-story 7,706 SF residential buildings of type VB construction, sprinklered. Within these buildings there are 138 total residential dwellings. The project also includes a one-story community building. Buildings are wood framed, slab on grad construction with fiber cement siding and asphalt shingle roofs.

HAMPTON INN | CITY OF PATTERSON, CA
Building Plan Review, Building Inspection
CSG performed building plan review and inspection for this new 48,471SF, 4 story hotel with a valuation of $7,500,000. The project is Type V-A construction, fully sprinklered and includes 86 guestrooms, business occupancies, lobby, breakfast area, meeting room, fitness room, and an outdoor pool and spa.

CITY OF KERMAN ANIMAL SHELTER | CITY OF KERMAN, CA
Building Inspection
CSG provided building inspection services on this new, 4,670 SF freestanding City animal shelter with a $1.2 million valuation. The project is type V-B construction with occupancy type B/U. CSG work involved facilitating a fast-paced construction schedule which demanded inspection scheduling flexibility and same day or next day inspections.

SoFi NFL Stadium & YouTube Theater | City of Inglewood, CA Building Plan Review
The Los Angeles (NFL) Stadium at Hollywood Park located in the City of Inglewood is 70,000 fixed seats and has the flexibility to accommodate up to 100,000 seats. CSG performs review for on-site improvements including grading, drainage and
roadways. CSG also performs general building plan review including architectural, accessibility/ADA review, energy plan review, and CALGreen review. Plan review tasks are performed according to the latest Federal, State, and local codes and regulations. In collaboration with the City of Inglewood, the program management team and the architect, CSG participated in meetings prior to plan submittal to address major code interpretation issues to provide for a seamless process during the review periods. CSG’s team approach with the stakeholders has provided and continues to facilitate timely turnaround.

CSG SOQ TO THE CITY OF ANGELS

BUILDING OFFICIAL / INSPECTOR SERVICES
36 C O D E E N F O R C E M EN T P R O J E C T S
General Code Enforcement Services | Multiple CSG Client Agencies (examples below) City of Marina, CA
CSG has provided contractual code enforcement services for the City of Marina on a continuous basis since 2007. Core services include general code enforcement throughout the City including responding to complaints, supporting the Chief Building Official in dangerous building and housing code inspections, and issuance of administrative citations to respondents who do not comply.

Other services include assisting the Planning Division in investigating zoning complaints and other violations of the Zoning Code, supporting the Engineering Department and Public Works Department in investigating violations of the Public Works Code and supporting the enterprise-funded Airport Department in identifying and responding to violations that occur on airport property.

Town of Los Altos Hills, CA
For two years CSG’s contract officer, working under the direction of the Community Development Director, has worked with the Town focusing on the assessment and closure of older cases, many of which have been complex — often having incomplete records, multiple owners and other challenging characteristics. These cases have required the experience of our veteran officer due to the high level of finesse needed to manage the non-compliant responsible party violations. A significant amount of cases required direct coordination with and approval of Town staff. Our officer frequently required coordination from outside resources (e.g., County of Santa Clara), working to create new model processes such as payment arrangements with the Town’s Finance Department, and representing the department as a seamless extension of the Town. CSG’s code enforcement officer’s work for the Town of Los Altos Hills has resulted in significant caseload reduction and has showcased skill sets of problem solving, diplomacy, efficiency, coordination, organization, documentation, and effectiveness — exemplifying CSG's capacity to tailor services and produce measurable positive results for communities with distinct needs.

County of Tuolumne, CA
CSG was retained by Tuolumne County to provide code enforcement services including all phases of code enforcement including general code, building and permit violations, planning and cannabis regulation.

City of Fullerton
CSG staff currently provides as-needed code enforcement services to the City of Fullerton.

Housing Program Code Enforcement Services | County of San Joaquin, CA CSG provides staff augmentation support to assist the Code Enforcement Department managing outstanding housing case reviews, inspections, issuance of notices, and any other relevant duties required with the housing program. CSG also provides support in creating and drafting policy to comply with SB296.

Stormwater Inspection Services (C4/MS4) | Cities of San Carlos, Pacifica, Milpitas and Town of Colma
CSG has provided regulatory inspection services including conducting inspections, issuance of Notice of Corrections, and follow-up inspections to ensure compliance. CSG provides/provided necessary assistance to agencies throughout process of required escalation of enforcement.

CSG SOQ TO THE CITY OF ANGELS

BUILDING OFFICIAL / INSPECTOR SERVICES
37 Short-Term Rental Program Enforcement Services | County of Placer, CA, and Cities of Monterey and Sausalito
CSG has provided short-term rental enforcement for the City of Monterey since 2015 and the County of Placer (2019) and City of Sausalito since 2018.

Our inspectors specialize in enforcing short term rental regulation as well as proactively identifying rental properties that are in violation. CSG code enforcement officers routinely handle a significant number of cases, issue administrative citations and pursue appropriate steps through the administrative process. Our citation rate is commensurate with enforcement needs and ranks high in the recovery of penalties up to and including property liens.

CDBG and Special Inspection Services | Cities of Los Banos and Kerman, CA CSG has provided Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) sponsored inspection services in the City of Los Banos since 2016 and the City of Kerman since 2018. Our inspectors specialize in resolving blight and nuisance complaints in these cities as well as throughout the Central Valley by concentrating inspection and nuisance abatement services within the low to moderate income census tracts in block grant cities.

Cannabis Growing Inspection | County of Tuolumne, CA & City of King City, CA CSG provided part-time cannabis regulation for Tuolumne County and King City, CA as well as General Code Enforcement Services commencing in 2018.

Code Enforcement Training Officer | Cities of Newman, Gustine, Newark, CA and the County of New Castle Delaware
CSG has provided at least one training officer for new code enforcement staff in the Cities of Gustine, Newark, Newman and two for the County of New Castle Delaware. Training of these new officers included business licensing, field checks, handling citizen complaints, inspections, investigations, case management and exercising sound decision-making at all times.

City of Angels Council Meeting
JUNE 7, 2022 REGULAR AGENDA 7.E

E. Discussion and Direction on the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Proposed Budget, Rebecca Callen, City Administrator
___________________________________________________________________ 1 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Proposed Budget
For the Fiscal Year
July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023
City Council

Alvin Broglio – Mayor
Jennifer Davis-Herndon – Vice Mayor
Caroline Shirato
Gretel Tiscornia
Isabel Moncada

City Administrator
Rebecca Callen
City Attorney
White Churchill
City Clerk
Rose Beristianos
Management Team
Scott Ellis – Police Chief
Chris O’Flinn – Public Works Superintendent
Michelle Gonzalez – Finance Director
John Rohrabaugh – Fire Chief
Amy Augustine – Contracted Planner
2 2022-23 Proposed Budget
DATE: June 7, 2022
TO: City Council
FROM: Rebecca Callen, City Administrator
RE: DISCUSSION AND DIRECTION ON THE FY 2022-23 PROPOSED BUDGET

RECOMMENDATION
Make recommendations regarding the proposed budget to be brought back on June 21, 2022, for final adoption.

BACKGROUND
The City is required to have a budget adopted no later than June 30, 2022, to take effect on July 1, 2022. The City Administrator and Departments have discussed needs and available resources to determine the best options for the upcoming fiscal year.

DISCUSSION
The City Administrator started on February 7, 2022, and immediately began combing through the funds, departments, budgets, and transactional information. Comparisons to prior years, reconciliation of assets and liabilities, funds balances, and external banking information were all reviewed and identified for applicability in the 2022-23 FY budget.

Several changes are included in this proposal, including the consolidation of department accounts. This budget includes a stronger finance outlook, a recognition of carryover from prior years, and conservative grant funding. Please note, as grants are identified, staff will bring forward a full staff report with grant funding, project costs, and any local match requirements to augment the budget upon approval by City Council. As such, some grants that are in the application phase have not been included at this time.

Based on aligning funds with activity, the expenditures are higher largely due to expending cash carry on one-time projects and equipment.

General Fund
The General Fund is the city’s largest operational fund. This fund provides funding for most of the city departments and a majority of core services including public safety, streets, and roads.

Departments or functions under the General Fund are City Council, Administration, Finance, City Attorney, Community Services, Police, Fire, Streets and Roads, Parks, Building/Code/Planning, and Engineering.
3 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Major Funding Sources for the General Fund
• Tax Revenues such as property Taxes (the city receives 0.785% of the 1% of ad valorem County property taxes), franchise fees, transient occupancy tax (TOT); State and County distributed revenues from sales tax revenues such as gas taxes, SLESF (Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund), Prop 172. • Licenses and permits such as business licenses, plan reviews, and building inspections. • Service charges
• Interdepartmental transfers from water and sewer funds to cover overhead costs incurred under the general fund departments (Finance is going to be building a new methodology and implementing this FY)
Further, the General Fund has a healthy fund reserve that has been building for several years.

Taxes
74%
Licenses and Permits
4%
Fines & Penalties
0%
Facilities Rentals
1%
Charges for Service
1%
Grant Income
7%
Misc Revenue
2%
Interest Income
0%
Transfer In
11%

GENERAL FUND REVENUES BY SOURCE
4 2022-23 Proposed Budget
The largest factors of the General Fund balance increase were the Sales tax and TOT increases ($1,075,379), higher grant funding, and Strike Team reimbursements (discussion needed), in addition to miscellaneous revenue increases and lower than anticipated expenditures.

These increases prompted a General fund Reserve Policy to be adopted on April 2, 2019.

Economic Uncertainty Reserve (5%)
Exposures Reserve (5%)
Emergency Reserves (10%)
Internal Service Fund Reserve (2%)
Futures Capital Project Reserve (1%)
Encumbrance Reserve (2%)
Unassigned and Unrestricted Reserve (25%)
The policy adopted was done by minute order as opposed to resolution and lacks the methodology to determine what each of these is based on. At this point, the proposal includes the request to establish a NEW contingency fund with $2,000,000 leaving $1.8 million in unassigned balance in the General Fund, or 33% of Operating plus capital expenditures. Staff will bring forward a resolution and policy guide to address a healthy reserve policy for ALL City funds.
-
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
3,000,000
3,500,000
4,000,000
4,500,000
2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22* General Fund Balance
5 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Important details in this proposal are:
• $200,000 for Building Repairs (either addressing the Modular or refurbishing the old City Hall location)
• Create a NEW Contingency fund for the General Fund ($2,000,000) • Create a NEW Strike Team fund for Strike Team activities and retain the equipment use reimbursement component of the reimbursement
• Elimination of ALL sub-departments for Public Works to ONE department (7010) • Elimination of cost allocations to Water and Wastewater for Building, planning, and Engineering
• Increase to City Council budget to accommodate 5 Council members to attend Council Member Academy)
• Direct change of Engineering Services for Water and Wastewater to those respective funds • Significant investment in the website, network overhaul, server replacements, and cybersecurity
• Increase Building/Planning to accommodate Planning needs for upcoming projects, code compliance, and building inspection/plan review
• Full year of the additional 3 full-time Firefighters (adopted in the 2021/22 Fiscal Year) • Fire medical equipment (paid with Prop 172 reserves)
(1000) City Officials
1%
(1500) City Attorney
1% (2000) City Engineer
1%
(3000)Finance and
Administration
23%
(3002) Community
Support
2%
(4000) Building and
Planning
12%
(6000) Fire
Department
16%
(6100) Police
Department
36%
(7010) Public Works
8%

GENERAL FUND EXPENSES BY DEPARTMENT
6 2022-23 Proposed Budget
• School Resource Officer (offset with BHHS reimbursement) • Police vehicle replacement
• Payment for K9 vehicle ordered 2021-22
• Investment in several road related maintenance efforts throughout the city (most funded with allocations from Special Revenue Funds)
Overall this proposal is requesting to expend $317,935 more than projected sources, using the fund balance that is being carried over. The basis for this is to align one-time sources (fund balance) with one-time expenditures, in addition to identifying shortfalls in the fee structure for Building and Planning.

One-time expenses of $244,321 are as follows:

Building and Planning went from net revenue of $39,567 in 2020/21 to a net expense of $279,239 projected for 2022-23. Areas of concern for fees are the alignment of planning events and building plan review/inspections as it correlates with the Building Permits and Planning Fees. Additionally, there is an increase to the annual contracted costs for Building Official/Plan Review of $10,000 and $20,000 for Code Compliance.

Code Compliance is a health and safety activity and becomes a largely General Fund responsibility with very little to no offset in revenues.

Lastly, Public Works has deferred maintenance and park activities that have become a priority. As such, a catch-up of tools, safety equipment, deferred maintenance, and addressing hazard trees is a requirement. As additional funding is identified, that may alleviate some of the $48,890 General Fund.

Special Revenue Funds
Special revenue funds are restricted funding sources that are designated for highly specific purposes. Several of the City fees, gas taxes, grants, and designated TOT funds are held in these funds and transferred to offset expenditures in General Fund departments. Transfer happens ONLY after confirmation of actual expense and approval of expenditure alignment to the funding source. The estimated fund balance is $2.8 million. Overall activities budgeted for 2022-23 will reduce the balance by $289,311.

Finance and Administration Network/Server overhaul 35,000 Springbrook migration 14,320
Citygate - Phase II 45,000
Website overhaul 6,500
Phones 3,500
Police K9 replacement 45,876
Vehicle replacement 70,000
Building Planning Special Events and Code Compliance Software 11,000 Public Works Boomer Mower 10,000
City Council New Council Member Training 3,125
7 2022-23 Proposed Budget
The recommendation of creating a NEW Strike Team fund allows for the activity of Strike Team to be reimbursed for the personnel and supply costs in addition to saving off the equipment use reimbursement that can be put away for future capital equipment purchases/replacements. The practice has been to fold reimbursement into the General Fund. However, that overage then gets allocated across all General Fund departmental needs, and when a fire capital equipment request is made that need conflicts with the overall needs of the General Fund. Keeping it separate eliminates that conflict.

Capital Funds
Capital Funds are reserved for various capital activities across the General Fund and Enterprise funds. The estimated fund’s balance is $7 million with activities budgeted for 2022-23, the balance will increase to $8.7 million. Please note, that due to several transitions, requirements to close out projects to determine remaining funding available, and coordination with CCOG, Engineering, and departmental staff, a Capital Improvement Project group will meet in July to establish a more comprehensive Capital Improvement Plan across the next three (3) years to be brought back to Council for adoption and amendment.

Debt Funds
The city has two debt service funds to address Water and Sewer Long Term Debt. There are currently two internal loans between Water and Sewer that are being recommended to be paid off as part of the 2022-23 budget using the fund balance in the Sewer Debt Service Fund.

Enterprise Funds
The City maintains its Water and Sewer functions. Each of those is a distinct enterprise and must be accounted for separately. The most current rate structure is intended to increase rates for Operations and Maintenance in addition to capital funding.

There are two types of capital projects that pertain to Water and Sewer:
• Repair and Rehabilitation of existing infrastructure
• Expansion of facilities and infrastructure to “expand” capacity or connections Repair and Rehabilitation are funded from rate revenues. These revenues have been accumulating in the operating funds for Water and Sewer and only a portion was transferred annually, based on a budget amount.

The budgeted amount to transfer was based on the Capital budgeted each year, and what was ultimately expended. However, the accumulation of capital should be transferred to the extent that the bulk of the fund balance is in the respective Capital Funds for Water and Sewer and the remaining fund balance is sufficient to meet the best practice reserve balance in the operational funds. 8 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Between Water ($1.5 million) and Sewer ($3.4 million), there is just over $4.9 million in estimated fund balance. It is recommended to transfer $500k and $1 million respectively to the capital funds for future planning. Upon the capital plan workgroup meeting, this may change but will be brought back to Council for discussion and budget amendment.

UWPA Consideration
UWPA has requested contributing members to fund them at a level of $540,000 ($40,000 for the Water agreement paid from the Water O&M fund and $500,000 paid from the pass-thru collections from ratepayers.

The 2022-23 budget contemplated a rate for UWPA at a Water Year 3, using the rate structure in Attachment A. The contribution level at a water year 3 is $442,629 for the Fiscal Year 2022-23. To meet this threshold, without pulling additional funds from the City operating funds, the City is pulling $26,251 from the external UWPA reserve account identified this fiscal year, with cash carry projected as of 6/30/22 of $34,281.93, leaving a projected reserve balance of $3,161.93.

An important note is that the projected UWPA collections found in Attachment A for the Fiscal Year 2021/22 were $429,737 to align with the requested funding base of $417,000. However, the actual collections were $365,281.87, or $64,455.13 short. The intention of this rate structure was to collect sufficient funding for UWPA operations and Capital needs associated with water customers in the system.

The 2022/23 Fiscal Year is at a Water Year 3 (by the skin of our teeth). However, the request for funding from UWPA is $57,371 higher than the rate structure anticipated, and the rate structure is showing that the actual collections are lower than projected from customers.

To alleviate some of this, both the City of Angels staff and UPUD staff are working with UWPA to identify funding opportunities via grants, loans, and project alignment opportunities with both agencies that may reduce the overall costs of capital projects. However, to address the issue of the collections not mirroring the projected collections, the recommendation is to utilize the Water Year 3.5 rate structure. 9 2022-23 Proposed Budget
This will ensure that the collections are in line with the operating needs of UWPA to supply water for our residents and smooth the increases that are further projected for the 2023/24 Fiscal Year should the City enter an Actual Water Year 4 (which is highly likely).

Final Remarks
The 2022-23 budget represents a stronger financial outlook than what had occurred in 2020-21 or 2021-22. The pandemic prevented much by the way of projecting growth due to the unknowns. I would like to thank Council for the guidance, the staff for their dedication, and thank the community for its resiliency and patience as we all worked to figure out these last two years!

ATTACHMENTS
City of Angels 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Angels Camp Capital Improvement Program 2020-2025
Attachment A UWPA
3 4 3.5 Per Month Annual
5/8" 13.57 17.35 15.46 1.89 22.68
3/4" 20.36 26.03 23.20 2.84 34.02
1" 33.93 43.38 38.66 4.73 56.7

1.5" 67.86 86.75 77.31 9.45 113.34
2" 108.57 138.8 123.69 15.12 181.38
3" 203.57 260.26 231.92 28.35 340.14
4" 339.29 433.76 386.53 47.24 566.82
6" 678.58 867.52 773.05 94.47 1133.64
Increase
10 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Table of Contents
Combined City Funding.........................................................................................................................................11 Fund Balance Projections......................................................................................................................................12 Appropriations Summary......................................................................................................................................14 Revenue Summary ................................................................................................................................................14 Expenses by Fund Class.........................................................................................................................................15 Revenue by Fund Class..........................................................................................................................................15 Appropriations Net ...............................................................................................................................................16 Debt.......................................................................................................................................................................17 Capital Equipment List..........................................................................................................................................18 CIP General Fund...................................................................................................................................................18 CIP Water..............................................................................................................................................................19 CIP Sewer ..............................................................................................................................................................19 General Fund 2022-23 Budget by Department ....................................................................................................20 Special Revenue Budget 2022-23 By Fund............................................................................................................35 NEW Strike Team ..............................................................................................................................................41 Capital Funds 2022-23 Budget..............................................................................................................................42 Debt Funds 2022-23 Budget .................................................................................................................................45 Enterprise Funds 2022-23 Budget ........................................................................................................................46 Budget Detail by Department...............................................................................................................................49 City Council .......................................................................................................................................................49 City Attorney.....................................................................................................................................................49 City Engineer.....................................................................................................................................................50 Finance and Administration..............................................................................................................................51 Community Support..........................................................................................................................................55 Building and Planning........................................................................................................................................56 Fire Department................................................................................................................................................59 Police.................................................................................................................................................................62 Public Works .....................................................................................................................................................66 Enterprise Budgets............................................................................................................................................69 Sewer O&M 2022-23 Budget........................................................................................................................69 Water O&M 2022-23 Budget........................................................................................................................73 11 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Position Allocation ............................................................................................................................................76 Financial Management Policy ...............................................................................................................................76 A. General Financial Goals.................................................................................................................................76 B. Budget Administration ..................................................................................................................................76 C. General Revenue Management.....................................................................................................................77 D. Utility Rates and Fees....................................................................................................................................78 E. Investments...................................................................................................................................................78 F. Expenditures..................................................................................................................................................78 G. Capital Improvement Program..................................................................................................................79 H. Fund Balance and Reserves...........................................................................................................................80 K. Accounting, Auditing and Financial Reporting...............................................................................................80 L. Human Resources Management ...................................................................................................................81 Combined City Funding
The fund balances will continue to change immaterially until the final close of cash. This will take place sometime in August. As such, the beginning balances are estimates with the revenues and expenditures aligning with proposed budget activities. Ultimately, the General Fund’s unassigned balance is being recommended to shift $2,000,000 to a NEW General Fund Contingency fund leaving the balance of $1.9 as an “assigned” balance restricted within the General Fund.
12 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Fund Balance Projections
Description
General
Fund
Special
Revenue
Fund
Capital
Funds
Debt Service
Funds
Enterprise
Funds Total
Revenues
Beginning Balance 4,220,000 2,823,130 7,064,529 700,000 4,815,821 19,623,480 Taxes 3,709,000 492,500 4,201,500
Licenses & Permits 186,500 77,000 215,000 478,500
Fines and Penalties 10,400 20,000 30,400
Facilites Rentals 45,317 1,000 46,317
Charges for Service 32,700 5,086,547 5,119,247
Grants 327,952 848,184 1,978,049 3,154,185
Misc. Revenue 126,301 890,000 4,000 1,020,301
Interest 10,000 4,765 3,700 5,000 25,000 48,465
Transfers 624,240 1,500,000 224,574 2,348,814
Total Revenues 5,072,410 1,422,449 4,586,749 229,574 5,136,547 16,447,729 Expenditures
Salaries and Benefits 3,251,713 1,057,262 4,308,975
Service and Supplies 1,819,804 1,165,732 2,985,536
Capital Outlay 318,828 250,000 2,588,049 243,000 3,399,877 Debt Service 418,795 418,795
Transfers - 1,461,760 40,000 431,961 1,724,573 3,658,294 Total Expenses 5,390,345 1,711,760 2,628,049 850,756 4,190,567 14,771,477 Ending Balance 3,902,065 2,533,819 9,023,229 78,818 5,761,801 21,299,732 Reserves - - - - -
Unassigned Fund Balance 3,902,065 2,533,819 9,023,229 78,818 5,761,801 21,299,732 13 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Fund Type 6/30/2022 Est Ending Balance 6/30/2023 Projected Ending Balance General Funds
010 General Fund 3,414,250 1,902,065
0XX GF Contingency - 2,000,000
Special Revenue Funds
(018) General Plan Reserve 41,264 44,764
(1XX) Strike Team - 100,000
(205) Gas Tax 132,033 132,033
(206) SB1 RMRA 237,780 237780
CDBG Grant - -
(214) 1st Homebuyers 149,218 149,818
(252) SLESF 118,105 80,000
(256) AB109 10,932 10,000
(257) Prop 172 66,193 106,193
(270) TOT EMS 116,674 80,000
(271) TOT Roads 35,000 35,000
(272) TOT- Tourism 9,825 8,500
(285) Traffic Impact 977,491 1,040,491
(286) Parking In-Lieu 14,337 22,387
(287) Park Impact 24,643 24,643
(288) Police Impact 41,057 43,597
(290) Fire Impact 15,573 18,613
(295) American Rescue Plan 473,180 400,000
Capital Funds
(050) GF Capital Equipment 55,284 55,284
(115) GF Projects - -
(305) Sewer Expansion 336,336 375,000
(310) Sewer R&R 860,744 1,860,744
(355) Water Expansion 920,890 960,890
(365) Water R&R 5,096,311 5,771,311
Debt Funds
(315) Sewer Debt 551,714 -
(360) Water Debt 170,710 78,818
Enterprise Funds
(300) Sewer O&M 3,400,000 3,914,000
(350) Water O&M 1,500,000 1,847,801
Total 18,769,544 21,299,732
14 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Appropriations Summary
Appropriations or Uses are the expenditures and transfers by activity.

The change with the City Attorney and Finance and Administration is the reduction of GF costs with a Cost Allocation to Water and Sewer. This plan is still being fully developed by the Finance Director and will be reviewed by the City Administrator. The current budget includes estimated cost allocations.

Revenue Summary
Revenues or Sources are also identified by the activity below.

Appropriations Summary FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 Percent
Department Actuals Amended Proposed Change
General Government
City Council 24,536 30,078 36,382 21%
City Attorney 50,145 205,000 75,000 -63%
City Engineering 131,964 212,818 220,085 3%
Finance & Administration 1,032,788 1,338,429 1,102,105 -18% Community Support 108,918 108,950 109,020 0%
Building & Planning 237,517 509,124 655,691 29%
Public Protection
Fire 789,669 1,436,792 899,773 -37%
Police 1,592,769 2,126,562 1,996,803 -6%
Public Ways
Public Works 208,783 1,083,407 457,886 -58%
Enterprise (Business-Type Activities)
Water 390,981 471,431 1,548,049 228%
Wastewater 754,501 1,335,150 2,642,518 98%
Revenue Summary FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 Percent
Department Actuals Amended Proposed Change
General Government
City Council - - - -
City Attorney - - - -
City Engineering - - - -
Finance & Administration 4,262,995 3,072,500 3,799,662 24% Building & Planning 277,083 446,452 376,452 -16%
Public Protection
Fire 118,590 342,022 184,500 -46%
Police 545,075 453,436 277,800 -39%
Public Ways
Public Works 437,420 723,659 408,996 -43%
Enterprise (Business-Type Activities)
Water 1,664,533 1,560,600 1,895,850 21%
Wastewater 2,817,617 2,356,600 3,240,697 38%
15 2022-23 Proposed Budget
The reductions in Building and Planning are due to eliminating the allocation of Water and Sewer. The reduction of Fire and Police is due to no grant funding and the elimination of property rental revenue (MACT parking lot). The reduction to Public Works is the reduction of grant funding until it is fully developed against a project. Grants for Public Works are specific to road work.

Expenses by Fund Class
Note that the General Fund and Capital budgets are both budgeted lower in 2022-23. This reflects several changes in how the City is budgeting, including tightening up the budget. Should grant funding or additional revenue streams come forward, those will be brought back to Council as an amendment.

Revenue by Fund Class

Note that the Special Revenues are 24% lower. This is also a change in budget with a tightening of budgeting sources when it is known as opposed to budgeting a potential source. Additionally, the Debt Service is 43% lower by paying off the internal loan with the fund balance.

Expenses by Fund Class FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 Percent
Actuals Amended Proposed Change
Governmental Activities
General Fund 4,747,888 7,286,160 5,390,345 -26%
Special Revenues 813,477 1,847,751 1,711,760 -7%
Capital 2,354,437 5,903,264 3,113,049 -47%
Debt Service 91,410 402,633 850,756 111%
Proprietary (Business-Like Activities)
Enterprise 1,145,482 1,806,581 4,190,567 132%
Revenue by Fund Class FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 Percent
Actuals Amended Proposed Change
Governmental Activities
General Fund 5,641,163 5,038,069 5,072,410 1%
Special Revenues 728,415 1,867,395 1,422,449 -24%
Capital 2,322,999 5,062,884 4,586,749 -9%
Debt Service 760,150 402,633 229,574 -43%
Proprietary (Business-Like Activities)
Enterprise 4,482,150 3,917,200 5,136,547 31%
16 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Appropriations Net
This table shows the NET revenues less expenses by Department. Note that ALL General Fund Departments are net cost except for Finance and Administration. This is due to ALL Sales Tax, Property Tax, and the GF portion of TOT being accumulated in this budget.

The main contributor to the percentage changes in the department budgets is the change in cost allocation.

The intention is to align the funding sources with activity and allowable expenses.

Approp Net FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 Percent
Department Actuals Amended Proposed Change
General Fund Departments
City Council (24,536) (30,078) (36,382) 21%
City Attorney (50,145) (205,000) (75,000) -63%
City Engineering (131,964) (212,818) (57,685) -73%
Finance & Administration 3,230,207 1,734,071 2,697,557 56% Community Support (108,918) (108,950) (84,020) -23%
Building & Planning 39,567 (62,672) (279,239) 346%
Fire Department (671,079) (1,094,770) (715,273) -35%
Police (1,047,694) (1,673,126) (1,719,003) 3%
Special Revenue Fund Departments
Strike Team 177,376 - - 0%
Public Works 228,637 - (48,890) 0%
Enterprise Fund Departments
Water 1,273,552 1,089,169 347,801 -68%
Wastewater 2,063,116 1,021,450 598,179 -41%
17 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Debt City of Angels FY 2022-2023
Debt Service Schedule - Construction & Maintenance
Principal Interest Principal Interest Principal Interest Principal Interest Principal Interest Beg Bal 2,864,844 - 136,449 - 111,702 - 9,297 3,122,292 - 2023 252,427 76,487 14,565 848 74,468 - 6,904 351 348,364 77,687 2024 259,907 69,545 14,710 746 37,234 - 2,393 28 314,244 70,319 2025 267,379 62,399 14,857 642 - - 282,236 63,041
2026 274,841 55,048 15,006 538 - - 289,847 55,586
2027 282,295 47,494 15,527 432 - - 297,822 47,927
2028-2032 1,527,995 117,015 61,784 654 - - 1,589,779 117,669 Totals 2,864,844 427,989 136,449 3,860 111,702 - 9,297 380 3,122,292 432,229 * Interfund loans between Water and Sewer are paid off in the 2022/23 Budget Total
Year
Ending
June 30,
USDA - Pinnacle
Wastewater Loan
Construction of Waste
Water Facility
Original Loan 2004
Refinance 2017
Expiration 3/2032
Refinanced Amt
$4,043,725

2.73%
State of CA Dept of Water
Resources - State
Revolving Fund
Wastewater
Sewer System Upgrade
Original Loan 2011
Expiration 9/2030
Amount $3,372,800
($3,086,400 Forgiven)
Balance due $286,400

1.00%
State of CA Dept of
Water Resources
Water Construction
Loan
Construction of Water
Facilities
Original Loan 2002
Expiration 7/2023
Amount $1,489,361

0.00%
Municipal Management,
Inc.

Police Vehicle
Original Date 2018
Expiration 11/2023
Amount $31,512

5.70%
18 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Capital Equipment List
CIP General Fund
City of Angels
FY 2022-23
Capital Equipment List
Department Description Cost Funding Source Fund
Finance and Administration Server/Network Project 35,000 Cash Carry GF Police Replacement Vehicle 115,876 Cash Carry GF
Strike Team Misc Equipment from ST Reim 100,000 CalFire ST Public Works Boom Mower 10,000 Cash Carry GF
Water/Wastewater Vehicle 3/4 Ton 84,000 Cash Carry W/W
Water/Wastewater Vehicle -1 1/2 Ton truck 84,000 Cash Carry W/W 428,876
* One truck will have upfitting of a utility cab
City of Angels
FY 2022-23
Capital Projects General
Fund
Department Description Total Cost FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 Funding Source Building/Planning Playground 177,952 177,952 Per Capita Grant Utica Park 3,000,000 Grant TBD
Utica Bathroom 68,000 68,000 CDBG
Angels Creek Trail* 5,085,000 520,000 CMAQ
Police Range Project 15,000 15,000 Prop 172 Fund Balance Public Works
50081- LTF Road
Work 40,000 40,000 LTF
50081- Road Repairs 100,000 100,000 CRSSA
Sign Project* 15,000 RSTP
Striping* 63,040 RSTP
Foundry Lane 360,600 180,300 180,300 TIM Fee
Traffic Signal #1 680,100 140,050 540,050 TIM Fee/Developer Funds Sidewalk Repairs 15,000 15,000 LTF
Fire Fire Campus 250,000 CDBG Grant
Finance/Administration
City Hall - Fix
Modular or refurbish
old 200,000 Reserves
9,541,652 943,992 320,350 1,240,350
19 2022-23 Proposed Budget
CIP Water
Note: To be amended in July/August to incorporate a broader plan

CIP Sewer
Note: To be amended in July/August to incorporate a broader plan

City of Angels
FY 2022-23
Capital Projects Water Fund Total Cost FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 Funding Source Backwash Handling Project 3,790,000 SWRB Grant
Water System Replacement Program Main St (P2) 390,000 75,000 315,000 Cash Carry AMI 525,000 150,000 150,000 Cash Carry
Total 4,705,000 75,000 465,000 150,000
City of Angels
FY 2022-23
Capital Projects Waste Water Fund Total Cost FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 Funding Source PLC Replacement (1 per year) 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 Cash Carry Grit Removal 135,000 Cash Carry
I&I Annual project Line Repairs 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Cash Carry East Trunck Sewer Phase 1/Vallecito Rd 2,270,000 1,900,000 HAZMIT/SLRLF Totals 2,445,000 2,210,000 175,000 175,000
20 2022-23 Proposed Budget
General Fund 2022-23 Budget by Department

General Fund (in 010)
(1000) City
Officials
(1500) City
Attorney
(2000) City
Engineer
Revenue
Taxes
40001-Secured/Unsecured Property Tax - - -
40200-Sales Tax - - -
40201-Prop 172 Public Safety - - -
40202-Franchise Fees - - -
40203-Transient Occupancy Tax - - -
40205-Document Transfer Tax - - -
40501-Motor Vehicle In-Leiu Tax - - -
Total Local Taxes - - -
Licenses and Permits
40300-Business License - - -
40301-Sign Permits - - -
40302-Home Occupancy Permit - - -
40303-Building Permits - - -
40304-Encroachments - - -
40307-SB 1186 Revenues - - -
40600-Planning Fees - - -
Total Licenses and Permits - - -
Fines & Penalties
40401-Traffic/Parking - - -
40402-Criminal Fines - - -
40404-Parking Enforcement - - -
Total Fines & Penalties - - -
Facilities Rentals
40704-Property Rental - - -
40717-Park Shelter Rental - - -
Total Facilities Rentals - - -
Charges for Service
40604-Admin Fees - GHC - - -
40605-Admin Fees - School - - -
40606-Admin - LAFCO - - -
40608-Police Special Services - - -
40612-Fire Special Services - - -
40620-Admin - LLD - - -
407XX-CCW Fees - - -
Total Charges for Service - - -
21 2022-23 Proposed Budget
General Fund (in 010)
(1000) City
Officials
(1500) City
Attorney
(2000) City
Engineer
Grant Income
44000-Grant Income - - -
Total Grant Income - - -
Misc Revenue
40503-POST Training Reimbursement - - -
40504-Highway 49 Street Cleaning - - -
40614-Banner/Event Fees - - -
40707-PD Vest Reimbursement - - -
40714-Reimburseable - - -
40727-Legal Recovery - Starr - - -
44029-MOA PD Reimbursement County - - -
Total Misc Revenue - - -
Interest Income
40700-Interest Earned - - -
Total Interest Income - - -
Transfer In
49999-Fund Transfer - In - - -
Total Transfer In - - -
Total Revenues and Transfer In - - -
Expenses
Salaries and Benefits
50000-Salaries -
50001-Salaries - Part Time -
50002-Overtime -
50010-Callout -
50011-On-Call Pay -
50015-Holiday Pay -
50017-Leave Payout -
50020-Medicare 261
50021-FICA 1,116
50025-Health Insurance -
50026-Dental & Life Insurance -
50027-Vision Insurance -
50028-PERS -
50029-Long Term Disability -
22 2022-23 Proposed Budget
General Fund (in 010)
(1000) City
Officials
(1500) City
Attorney
(2000) City
Engineer
50032-Uniform Allowance -
50034-Auto Allowance/Cell Phone
50037-Life Insurance -
50038-PERSUL -
50042-Council/Commission Stipends 18,000
50350-Workers' Compensation 1,080
Total Salaries and Benefits 20,457 - -
Service and Supplies
50051-Electricity - - -
50052-Propane - - -
50053-Telephone - - -
50054-Fuel - - -
50055-Street Lights - - -
50056-Computers/Software 1,625 - 325
50058-Auto Lease - - -
50059-Internet/Wireless Connection - - -
50060-Copier - - -
50061-Computer Maint/Software Lease - - -
50062-RMS System - - -
50063-Equipment Maintenance & Repair - - -
50064-Vehicle Maintenance & Repair - - -
50065-Radio Maintenance - - -
50066-Equipment Lease - - -
50068-Building Maintenance - - -
50069-Grounds Maintenance - - -
50070-Tools - - -
50071-Equipment Rental - - -
50072-Safety Equipment - - -
50073-SCBA Maintenance - - -
50074-Alarm - - -
50075-Street Signs - - -
50077-Equipment - - -
50078- Computer Software - - -
50081-Outside Consultant - - -
50082-Videographer 4,800 - -
50084-Administrative Fees - - -
50085-IT Services 1,000 - -
500XX-DOJ Fees (CCW) - - -
50086-Audit Services - - -
50087-Engineering Services - - 57,360
23 2022-23 Proposed Budget
General Fund (in 010)
(1000) City
Officials
(1500) City
Attorney
(2000) City
Engineer
50088-Legal Attorney Services - 150,000 -
50089-Legal Contingency - 25,000 -
50090-Codification - - -
50099-Dispatch Contract - - -
50106-Retirement Benefit Consultants - - -
50107-Solid Waste Fees - - -
50110-Revenue Consultant - - -
50111-Utilities - - -
50133-Rims License - - -
50135-Digital Evidence Maintenance - - -
50151-Range Supplies - - -
50152-Office Supplies 500 - -
50153-Materials and Supplies - - -
50156-Code Books - - -
50157-Medical Supplies - - -
50158-Facility/Janitorial Services - - -
50173-Postage - - -
50202-League of Cal. Cities - - -
50207-Central Sierra RC&D - - -
50218-Employee Appreciation 2,000 - -
50220-DAC Support - - -
50301-Dues & Subscriptions - - -
50302-Training & Travel 5,500 - -
50305-Physicals - - -
50306-Fire Uniforms - - -
50307-Uniform Service - - -
50310-LAFCO Contribution - - -
50311-Legal Notices 500 - -
50313-Recruiting - - -
50315-Fees - - -
50318-Investigations - - -
50320-POST Training - - -
50323-PD Vests - - -
50324-K-9 Program - - -
50325-Fire Prevention - - -
50326-Fire Meals - - -
50351-Liability Ins - - -
50366-Community Events/Meetings - - -
50400-Miscellaneous - - -
51005-Computer/Software - - -
59990-Cost Allocation O&M - (100,000) -
24 2022-23 Proposed Budget

General Fund (in 010)
(1000) City
Officials
(1500) City
Attorney
(2000) City
Engineer
Total Services and Supplies 15,925 75,000 57,685
Capital Outlay
51001-Capital Outlay - Equipment - - -
51002-Capital Outlay - Vehicle - - -
52096-Capital Project - - -
Total Capital Outlay - - -
Total Expenses and Capital Outlay 36,382 75,000 57,685
Revenue less Expenses (36,382) (75,000) (57,685)
25 2022-23 Proposed Budget

General Fund (in 010)
(3000)Finance
and
Administration
(3002)
Community
Support
(4000) Building and
Planning
Revenue
Taxes
40001-Secured/Unsecured Property Tax 690,000 - -
40200-Sales Tax 1,302,000 - -
40201-Prop 172 Public Safety 640,000 - -
40202-Franchise Fees 192,000 - -
40203-Transient Occupancy Tax 540,000 25,000 -
40205-Document Transfer Tax 20,000 - -
40501-Motor Vehicle In-Leiu Tax 300,000 - -
Total Local Taxes 3,684,000 25,000 -
Licenses and Permits
40300-Business License 38,000 - -
40301-Sign Permits - - 1,500
40302-Home Occupancy Permit - - 1,500
40303-Building Permits - - 90,000
40304-Encroachments - - 3,500
40307-SB 1186 Revenues - - 2,000
40600-Planning Fees - - 50,000
Total Licenses and Permits 38,000 - 148,500
Fines & Penalties
40401-Traffic/Parking - - -
40402-Criminal Fines - - -
40404-Parking Enforcement - - -
Total Fines & Penalties - - -
Facilities Rentals
40704-Property Rental 34,927 - -
40717-Park Shelter Rental - - -
Total Facilities Rentals 34,927 - -
Charges for Service
40604-Admin Fees - GHC 14,000 - -
40605-Admin Fees - School 600 - -
40606-Admin - LAFCO 3,600 - -
40608-Police Special Services - - -
40612-Fire Special Services - - -
40620-Admin - LLD 5,000 - -
407XX-CCW Fees - - -
Total Charges for Service 23,200 - -
26 2022-23 Proposed Budget

General Fund (in 010)
(3000)Finance
and
Administration
(3002)
Community
Support
(4000) Building and
Planning
-
Grant Income
44000-Grant Income - - 227,952
Total Grant Income - - 227,952
-
Misc Revenue
40503-POST Training Reimbursement - - -
40504-Highway 49 Street Cleaning - - -
40614-Banner/Event Fees - - -
40707-PD Vest Reimbursement - - -
40714-Reimburseable 500 - -
40727-Legal Recovery - Starr 9,035 - -
44029-MOA PD Reimbursement County - - -
Total Misc Revenue 9,535 - -
-
Interest Income
40700-Interest Earned 10,000 - -
Total Interest Income 10,000 - -
Transfer In
49999-Fund Transfer - In - - -
Total Transfer In - - -
Total Revenues and Transfer In 3,799,662 25,000 376,452 -
Expenses
Salaries and Benefits
50000-Salaries 399,112 - 50,940
50001-Salaries - Part Time - - -
50002-Overtime 2,500 - 1,500
50010-Callout - - -
50011-On-Call Pay - - -
50015-Holiday Pay - - -
50017-Leave Payout 10,000 - -
50020-Medicare 5,787 - 740
50021-FICA 24,745 - 3,159
50025-Health Insurance 66,440 - 15,147
50026-Dental & Life Insurance 7,075 - 1,712
50027-Vision Insurance 1,129 - 226
50028-PERS 49,176 - 7,142
50029-Long Term Disability 2,834 - 434
27 2022-23 Proposed Budget

General Fund (in 010)
(3000)Finance
and
Administration
(3002)
Community
Support
(4000) Building and
Planning
50032-Uniform Allowance - - -
50034-Auto Allowance/Cell Phone 2,400 - 480
50037-Life Insurance 288 - 58
50038-PERSUL 112,462 - 37,122
50042-Council/Commission Stipends - - 3,000
50350-Workers' Compensation 23,947 - 3,882
Total Salaries and Benefits 707,895 - 125,542
-
Service and Supplies -
50051-Electricity 739 - 360
50052-Propane 1 - -
50053-Telephone 2,520 - 1,104
50054-Fuel - - -
50055-Street Lights - - -
50056-Computers/Software 6,940 - 2,839
50058-Auto Lease - - -
50059-Internet/Wireless Connection 4,500 - -
50060-Copier 7,207 - 720
50061-Computer Maint/Software Lease 43,974 - 350
50062-RMS System - - -
50063-Equipment Maintenance & Repair 1,330 - -
50064-Vehicle Maintenance & Repair - - -
50065-Radio Maintenance - - -
50066-Equipment Lease 631 - -
50068-Building Maintenance 3,000 - -
50069-Grounds Maintenance 500 - -
50070-Tools - - -
50071-Equipment Rental - - -
50072-Safety Equipment - - -
50073-SCBA Maintenance - - -
50074-Alarm 1,500 - -
50075-Street Signs - - -
50077-Equipment 6,000 - -
50078- Computer Software - - -
50081-Outside Consultant 79,020 50,000 260,000
50082-Videographer - - -
50084-Administrative Fees - - -
50085-IT Services 18,500 - 500
500XX-DOJ Fees (CCW) - - -
50086-Audit Services 34,000 - -
50087-Engineering Services - - 25,000
28 2022-23 Proposed Budget
General Fund (in 010)
(3000)Finance
and
Administration
(3002)
Community
Support
(4000) Building and
Planning
50088-Legal Attorney Services - - -
50089-Legal Contingency - - -
50090-Codification 2,480 - -
50099-Dispatch Contract - - -
50106-Retirement Benefit Consultants 3,500 - -
50107-Solid Waste Fees - - -
50110-Revenue Consultant 2,500 - -
50111-Utilities 7,128 - 2,040
50133-Rims License - - -
50135-Digital Evidence Maintenance - - -
50151-Range Supplies - - -
50152-Office Supplies 5,000 - 1,500
50153-Materials and Supplies 800 - -
50156-Code Books - - -
50157-Medical Supplies - - -
50158-Facility/Janitorial Services 1,200 - -
50173-Postage 3,500 - -
50202-League of Cal. Cities - 3,380 -
50207-Central Sierra RC&D - 640 -
50218-Employee Appreciation - - -
50220-DAC Support - 55,000 -
50301-Dues & Subscriptions 2,790 - -
50302-Training & Travel 9,000 - 2,500
50305-Physicals - - -
50306-Fire Uniforms - - -
50307-Uniform Service - - -
50310-LAFCO Contribution - - 29,784
50311-Legal Notices 2,500 - 14,000
50313-Recruiting 500 - -
50315-Fees 7,950 - -
50318-Investigations - - -
50320-POST Training - - -
50323-PD Vests - - -
50324-K-9 Program - - -
50325-Fire Prevention - - -
50326-Fire Meals - - -
50351-Liability Ins 265,000 - -
50366-Community Events/Meetings - - 500
50400-Miscellaneous 10,000 - -
51005-Computer/Software 35,000 - 11,000
59990-Cost Allocation O&M (175,000) - -
29 2022-23 Proposed Budget

General Fund (in 010)
(3000)Finance
and
Administration
(3002)
Community
Support
(4000) Building and
Planning
Total Services and Supplies 394,210 109,020 352,197
-
Capital Outlay -
51001-Capital Outlay - Equipment - - -
51002-Capital Outlay - Vehicle - - -
52096-Capital Project - - 177,952
Total Capital Outlay - - 177,952
-
Total Expenses and Capital Outlay 1,102,105 109,020 655,691 -
Revenue less Expenses 2,697,557 (84,020) (279,239)
30 2022-23 Proposed Budget

General Fund (in 010)
(6000) Fire
Department
(6100) Police
Department
(7010) Public
Works Totals
Revenue
Taxes
40001-Secured/Unsecured Property Tax - - - 690,000
40200-Sales Tax - - - 1,302,000
40201-Prop 172 Public Safety - - - 640,000
40202-Franchise Fees - - - 192,000
40203-Transient Occupancy Tax - - - 565,000
40205-Document Transfer Tax - - - 20,000
40501-Motor Vehicle In-Leiu Tax - - - 300,000
Total Local Taxes - - - 3,709,000
Licenses and Permits
40300-Business License - - - 38,000
40301-Sign Permits - - - 1,500
40302-Home Occupancy Permit - - - 1,500
40303-Building Permits - - - 90,000
40304-Encroachments - - - 3,500
40307-SB 1186 Revenues - - - 2,000
40600-Planning Fees - - - 50,000
Total Licenses and Permits - - - 186,500
Fines & Penalties
40401-Traffic/Parking - 150 - 150
40402-Criminal Fines - 250 - 250
40404-Parking Enforcement - 10,000 - 10,000
Total Fines & Penalties - 10,400 - 10,400
Facilities Rentals
40704-Property Rental - - 9,390 44,317
40717-Park Shelter Rental - - 1,000 1,000
Total Facilities Rentals - - 10,390 45,317
Charges for Service
40604-Admin Fees - GHC - - - 14,000
40605-Admin Fees - School - - - 600
40606-Admin - LAFCO - - - 3,600
40608-Police Special Services - 3,000 - 3,000
40612-Fire Special Services 5,000 - - 5,000
40620-Admin - LLD - - - 5,000
407XX-CCW Fees - 1,500 - 1,500
Total Charges for Service 5,000 4,500 - 32,700
31 2022-23 Proposed Budget
General Fund (in 010)
(6000) Fire
Department
(6100) Police
Department
(7010) Public
Works Totals
Grant Income
44000-Grant Income - - 100,000 327,952
Total Grant Income - - 100,000 327,952
Misc Revenue
40503-POST Training Reimbursement - 2,500 - 2,500
40504-Highway 49 Street Cleaning - - 4,600 4,600
40614-Banner/Event Fees - - 500 500
40707-PD Vest Reimbursement - 1,600 - 1,600
40714-Reimburseable 500 - - 1,000
40727-Legal Recovery - Starr - - - 9,035
44029-MOA PD Reimbursement County - 107,066 - 107,066
Total Misc Revenue 500 111,166 5,100 126,301
Interest Income
40700-Interest Earned - - - 10,000
Total Interest Income - - - 10,000
Transfer In
49999-Fund Transfer - In 179,000 151,734 293,506 624,240 Total Transfer In 179,000 151,734 293,506 624,240
Total Revenues and Transfer In 184,500 277,800 408,996 5,072,410 Expenses
Salaries and Benefits
50000-Salaries 378,785 761,234 59,190 1,649,261
50001-Salaries - Part Time 180,960 30,000 - 210,960
50002-Overtime 18,407 40,000 2,000 64,407
50010-Callout - - 1,630 1,630
50011-On-Call Pay - 13,338 2,071 15,409
50015-Holiday Pay 12,502 20,000 - 32,502
50017-Leave Payout 8,000 10,000 1,000 29,000
50020-Medicare 5,493 10,837 850 23,968
50021-FICA 23,485 46,334 3,632 102,471
50025-Health Insurance 59,745 104,563 9,856 255,751
50026-Dental & Life Insurance 5,676 9,951 953 25,367
50027-Vision Insurance 937 1,388 175 3,855
50028-PERS 49,980 124,808 6,775 237,881
50029-Long Term Disability 2,690 5,306 416 11,680
32 2022-23 Proposed Budget

General Fund (in 010)
(6000) Fire
Department
(6100) Police
Department
(7010) Public
Works Totals
50032-Uniform Allowance - 8,750 - 8,750
50034-Auto Allowance/Cell Phone 2,400 - 576 5,856
50037-Life Insurance 288 519 69 1,222
50038-PERSUL 12,708 248,544 22,602 433,438
50042-Council/Commission Stipends - - - 21,000
50350-Workers' Compensation 28,637 55,330 4,429 117,305 Total Salaries and Benefits 790,693 1,490,902 116,224 3,251,713 Service and Supplies
50051-Electricity 3,500 5,800 3,348 13,747
50052-Propane 2,000 1,500 1,000 4,501
50053-Telephone 4,200 16,363 3,000 27,187
50054-Fuel 13,000 30,000 - 43,000
50055-Street Lights - - 34,946 34,946
50056-Computers/Software 6,850 - 1,955 20,534
50058-Auto Lease - 7,260 - 7,260
50059-Internet/Wireless Connection - 4,500 - 9,000
50060-Copier 1,600 7,000 - 16,527
50061-Computer Maint/Software Lease - - - 44,324
50062-RMS System 630 1,400 - 2,030
50063-Equipment Maintenance & Repair 3,000 2,000 5,500 11,830 50064-Vehicle Maintenance & Repair 20,000 17,000 1,000 38,000 50065-Radio Maintenance 1,500 - - 1,500
50066-Equipment Lease - - - 631
50068-Building Maintenance 3,500 4,500 4,700 15,700
50069-Grounds Maintenance 1,500 - 2,000 4,000
50070-Tools - - 2,000 2,000
50071-Equipment Rental 500 - 1,600 2,100
50072-Safety Equipment - 8,500 1,500 10,000
50073-SCBA Maintenance 2,000 - - 2,000
50074-Alarm - - 2,000 3,500
50075-Street Signs - - 15,000 15,000
50077-Equipment - - 26,100 32,100
50078- Computer Software - 4,045 - 4,045
50081-Outside Consultant 700 - 172,200 561,920
50082-Videographer - - - 4,800
50084-Administrative Fees - 600 - 600
50085-IT Services - 12,000 - 32,000
500XX-DOJ Fees (CCW) - 1,500 - 1,500
50086-Audit Services - - - 34,000
50087-Engineering Services - - - 82,360
33 2022-23 Proposed Budget

General Fund (in 010)
(6000) Fire
Department
(6100) Police
Department
(7010) Public
Works Totals
50088-Legal Attorney Services - - - 150,000
50089-Legal Contingency - - - 25,000
50090-Codification - - - 2,480
50099-Dispatch Contract - 188,514 - 188,514
50106-Retirement Benefit Consultants - - - 3,500
50107-Solid Waste Fees - 150 113 263
50110-Revenue Consultant - - - 2,500
50111-Utilities 2,300 6,700 27,000 45,168
50133-Rims License - 3,187 - 3,187
50135-Digital Evidence Maintenance - 2,566 - 2,566
50151-Range Supplies - 6,000 - 6,000
50152-Office Supplies 1,600 3,500 500 12,600
50153-Materials and Supplies - 2,000 15,000 17,800
50156-Code Books 1,000 - - 1,000
50157-Medical Supplies 21,500 - - 21,500
50158-Facility/Janitorial Services 2,600 1,440 - 5,240
50173-Postage - - - 3,500
50202-League of Cal. Cities - - - 3,380
50207-Central Sierra RC&D - - - 640
50218-Employee Appreciation - - - 2,000
50220-DAC Support - - - 55,000
50301-Dues & Subscriptions 100 1,000 500 4,390
50302-Training & Travel 5,000 10,000 4,000 36,000
50305-Physicals 2,500 - - 2,500
50306-Fire Uniforms 4,500 - - 4,500
50307-Uniform Service - - 6,700 6,700
50310-LAFCO Contribution - - - 29,784
50311-Legal Notices - - - 17,000
50313-Recruiting - 7,500 - 8,000
50315-Fees - - - 7,950
50318-Investigations - 3,000 - 3,000
50320-POST Training - 5,000 - 5,000
50323-PD Vests - 3,000 - 3,000
50324-K-9 Program - 7,500 - 7,500
50325-Fire Prevention 2,500 - - 2,500
50326-Fire Meals 1,000 - - 1,000
50351-Liability Ins - - - 265,000
50366-Community Events/Meetings - - - 500
50400-Miscellaneous - - - 10,000
51005-Computer/Software - - - 46,000
59990-Cost Allocation O&M - - - (275,000)
34 2022-23 Proposed Budget

General Fund (in 010)
(6000) Fire
Department
(6100) Police
Department
(7010) Public
Works Totals
Total Services and Supplies 109,080 375,025 331,662 1,819,804 Capital Outlay
51001-Capital Outlay - Equipment - 15,000 10,000 25,000 51002-Capital Outlay - Vehicle - 115,876 - 115,876
52096-Capital Project - - - 177,952
Total Capital Outlay - 130,876 10,000 318,828
Total Expenses and Capital Outlay 899,773 1,996,803 457,886 5,390,345 Revenue less Expenses (715,273) (1,719,003) (48,890) (317,935) 35 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Special Revenue Budget 2022-23 By Fund
Special Revenue Funds
(018) General
Plan
(1XX) Strike
Team
(205) Gax
Tax
Revenue
Taxes
40900-Gas Tax 2103 24,000
40901-Gas Tax 2105 17,000
40902-Gas Tax 2106 20,500
40903-Gas Tax 2107 20,000
40904-Gas Tax 2107.5 1,000
40906-RMRA Tax (SB1) -
40204-Transient Occupancy Tax
Total Local Taxes 82,500
Licenses and Permits
40603-Road Mitigation Fees
40602-Park Mitigation Fees
40609-Park Mitigation Fees
40613-Fire Mitigation Fees
40630-General Plan Fee 3,500
Total Licenses and Permits 3,500 -
Grant Income
44000-Grant Income -
44032-American Rescue Plan -
Total Grant Income - -
Interest Income
40700-Interest Earned 300
Total Interest Income 300
Total Revenues and Transfer In 3,500 82,800
Expenses
Capital Outlay
52096-Capital Project -
51001-Capital Outlay - Equipment -
51002-Capital Outlay - Vehicle -
Total Capital Outlay -
Transfers Out
59999-Transfer out 82,800
Total Transfer Out - 82,800
Total Expenses and Capital Outlay and TO - 82,800
Revenue less Expenses 3,500 -
36 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Special Revenue Funds
(206) SB1
RMRA
CDBG
Grant
(214) 1st
Homebuyers
Revenue
Taxes
40900-Gas Tax 2103
40901-Gas Tax 2105
40902-Gas Tax 2106
40903-Gas Tax 2107
40904-Gas Tax 2107.5
40906-RMRA Tax (SB1) 50,000
40204-Transient Occupancy Tax
Total Local Taxes 50,000 - -
Licenses and Permits
40603-Road Mitigation Fees
40602-Park Mitigation Fees
40609-Park Mitigation Fees
40613-Fire Mitigation Fees
40630-General Plan Fee
Total Licenses and Permits - - -
Grant Income
44000-Grant Income - 235,004
44032-American Rescue Plan -
Total Grant Income - 235,004 -
Interest Income
40700-Interest Earned 600 20 600
Total Interest Income 600 20 600
Total Revenues and Transfer In 50,600 235,024 600
Expenses
Capital Outlay
52096-Capital Project - 235,000 -
51001-Capital Outlay - Equipment - -
51002-Capital Outlay - Vehicle - -
Total Capital Outlay - 235,000 -
Transfers Out
59999-Transfer out 50,600
Total Transfer Out 50,600 - -
Total Expenses and Capital Outlay and TO 50,600 235,000 - Revenue less Expenses - 24 600
37 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Special Revenue Funds
(252)
SLESF
(256)
AB109
(257) Prop
172
Revenue
Taxes
40900-Gas Tax 2103
40901-Gas Tax 2105
40902-Gas Tax 2106
40903-Gas Tax 2107
40904-Gas Tax 2107.5
40906-RMRA Tax (SB1)
40204-Transient Occupancy Tax
Total Local Taxes - - -
Licenses and Permits
40603-Road Mitigation Fees
40602-Park Mitigation Fees
40609-Park Mitigation Fees
40613-Fire Mitigation Fees
40630-General Plan Fee
Total Licenses and Permits - - -
Grant Income
44000-Grant Income 100,000 40,000
44032-American Rescue Plan
Total Grant Income 100,000 - 40,000
Interest Income
40700-Interest Earned 43 32
Total Interest Income 43 32 -
Total Revenues and Transfer In 100,043 32 40,000
Expenses
Capital Outlay
52096-Capital Project - - -
51001-Capital Outlay - Equipment - - -
51002-Capital Outlay - Vehicle - - -
Total Capital Outlay - - -
Transfers Out
59999-Transfer out 100,000
Total Transfer Out 100,000 - -
Total Expenses and Capital Outlay and TO 100,000 - -
Revenue less Expenses 43 32 40,000
38 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Special Revenue Funds
(270) TOT
EMS
(271) TOT
Roads
(272) TOTTourism
Revenue
Taxes
40900-Gas Tax 2103
40901-Gas Tax 2105
40902-Gas Tax 2106
40903-Gas Tax 2107
40904-Gas Tax 2107.5
40906-RMRA Tax (SB1)
40204-Transient Occupancy Tax 120,000 120,000 120,000
Total Local Taxes 120,000 120,000 120,000
Licenses and Permits
40603-Road Mitigation Fees
40602-Park Mitigation Fees
40609-Park Mitigation Fees
40613-Fire Mitigation Fees
40630-General Plan Fee
Total Licenses and Permits - - -
Grant Income
44000-Grant Income
44032-American Rescue Plan
Total Grant Income - - -
Interest Income
40700-Interest Earned
Total Interest Income - - -
Total Revenues and Transfer In 120,000 120,000 120,000
Expenses
Capital Outlay
52096-Capital Project - - -
51001-Capital Outlay - Equipment - 15,000 -
51002-Capital Outlay - Vehicle - - -
Total Capital Outlay - 15,000 -
Transfers Out
59999-Transfer out 120,000 120,000 120,000
Total Transfer Out 120,000 120,000 120,000
Total Expenses and Capital Outlay and TO 120,000 135,000 120,000 Revenue less Expenses - (15,000) -
39 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Special Revenue Funds
(285) Traffic
Impact
(286) Parking
In-Lieu
(287) Park
Impact
Revenue
Taxes
40900-Gas Tax 2103
40901-Gas Tax 2105
40902-Gas Tax 2106
40903-Gas Tax 2107
40904-Gas Tax 2107.5
40906-RMRA Tax (SB1)
40204-Transient Occupancy Tax
Total Local Taxes - - -
Licenses and Permits
40603-Road Mitigation Fees 60,000
40602-Park Mitigation Fees 8,000
40609-Park Mitigation Fees
40613-Fire Mitigation Fees
40630-General Plan Fee
Total Licenses and Permits 60,000 8,000 -
Grant Income
44000-Grant Income
44032-American Rescue Plan
Total Grant Income - - -
Interest Income
40700-Interest Earned 3,000 50 40
Total Interest Income 3,000 50 40
Total Revenues and Transfer In 63,000 8,050 40
Expenses
Capital Outlay
52096-Capital Project
51001-Capital Outlay - Equipment
51002-Capital Outlay - Vehicle
Total Capital Outlay
Transfers Out
59999-Transfer out
Total Transfer Out - - -
Total Expenses and Capital Outlay and TO - - -
Revenue less Expenses 63,000 8,050 40
40 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Special Revenue Funds
(288) Police
Impact
(290) Fire
Impact
(295) American
Rescue Plan Totals
Revenue
Taxes
40900-Gas Tax 2103 24,000
40901-Gas Tax 2105 17,000
40902-Gas Tax 2106 20,500
40903-Gas Tax 2107 20,000
40904-Gas Tax 2107.5 1,000
40906-RMRA Tax (SB1) 50,000
40204-Transient Occupancy Tax 360,000
Total Local Taxes - - - 492,500
Licenses and Permits
40603-Road Mitigation Fees 60,000
40602-Park Mitigation Fees 8,000
40609-Park Mitigation Fees 2,500 2,500
40613-Fire Mitigation Fees 3,000 3,000
40630-General Plan Fee
Total Licenses and Permits 2,500 3,000 - 77,000
Grant Income
44000-Grant Income 375,004
44032-American Rescue Plan 473,180 473,180
Total Grant Income - - 473,180 848,184
Interest Income
40700-Interest Earned 40 40 4,765
Total Interest Income 40 40 - 4,765
Total Revenues and Transfer In 2,540 3,040 473,180 1,422,449 Expenses
Capital Outlay
52096-Capital Project 235,000
51001-Capital Outlay - Equipment 15,000
51002-Capital Outlay - Vehicle -
Total Capital Outlay 250,000
Transfers Out
59999-Transfer out 868,360 1,461,760
Total Transfer Out - - 868,360 1,461,760
Total Expenses and Capital Outlay and TO - - 868,360 1,711,760 Revenue less Expenses 2,540 3,040 (395,180) (289,311)
41 2022-23 Proposed Budget
NEW Strike Team
Dept Requested - Dept
6010 Strike Team
2022-23 Request

NEW FUND
2020-21
Actuals 2021-22 Budget
2021-22 Est
Actuals
Total Revenues $250,000 $462,776 $235,000 $150,000
44000-Grant Income $250,000 $462,776 $235,000 $150,000
Strike team reimbursement $250,000 $462,776 $235,000 $150,000 $0
Total Expenses $250,000 $285,400 $235,000 $127,385
50002-Overtime $0 $0 $150,000 $168
$0 $150,000 $168
50003-Strike Team Salaries $150,000 $238,072 $0 $0
150,000 $238,072 $0
50020-Medicare $0 $1,791 $1,100 $0
$1,791 $1,100
50021-FICA $0 $7,715 $3,500 $0
$7,715 $3,500
50025-Health Insurance $0 $2,422 $0 $0
$2,422
50026-Dental & Life Insurance $0 $334 $0 $0
$334
50027-Vision Insurance $0 $57 $0 $0
$57
50028-PERS $0 $1,271 $0 $0
$1,271
50029-Long Term Disability $0 -$64 $0 $0
-$64
50037-Life Insurance $0 $2 $0 $0
$2
50350-Workers' Compensation $0 $7,580 $6,000 $12
$7,580 $6,000 $12
50064-Vehicle Maintenance & R $0 $4,768 $14,400 $14,000 $4,768 $14,400 $14,000
50072-Safety Equipment $0 $6,388 $10,000 $5,000
$6,388 $10,000 $5,000
50302-Training & Travel $0 $5,337 $0 $0
$0 $5,337
50326-Fire Meals $0 $193 $0 $0
$0 $193
50081-Outside Consultant $0 $0 $35,000 $68,205
$0 $35,000 $68,205
51001-Capital Outlay - Equipme $100,000 $9,534 $15,000 $40,000 $100,000 $9,534 $15,000 $40,000
Totals $0 $177,376 $0 $22,615
42 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Capital Funds 2022-23 Budget
Capital Funds
(050) GF Capital Equp
Reserve
(115) GF
Projects
Revenue
Licenses and Permits
43006-Sewer Connection Fee - Buildin -
42007-Water Capital Improvement Fee
43010-Sewer Capital Replacement -
Total Licenses and Permits - -
Grant Revenue
4XXXX-HMGP -
4XXXX-RSTP State -
40807-ATP Funds -
40808-HSIP Funds -
40904-Gas Tax 2107.5 -
4XXXX - CRSSA -
4XXXX - SWRB
40204-Transient Occupancy Tax
Total Grant Revenue - -
Misc Revenues
40550-Asset Sales 40,000 850,000
40609-Park Mitigation Fees
40613-Fire Mitigation Fees
40630-General Plan Fee
Total Licenses and Permits 40,000 850,000
Interest Income
40700-Interest Earned -
Total Interest Income - -
Transfers In
49999- Transfers In -
Total Transfers In - -
Total Revenues and Transfer In 40,000 850,000
Expenses
Capital Outlay 200,000
52096-Capital Project - -
51001-Capital Outlay - Equipment -
51002-Capital Outlay - Vehicle -
Total Capital Outlay - 200,000
Transfers Out
59999-Transfer out 40,000
Total Transfer Out 40,000 -
Total Expenses and Capital Outlay and TO 40,000 200,000 Revenue less Expenses - 650,000
43 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Capital Funds
(139) Transportation
Projects
(305) Sewer
Expansion
Revenue
Licenses and Permits
43006-Sewer Connection Fee - Buildin 50,000
42007-Water Capital Improvement Fee
43010-Sewer Capital Replacement 120,000
Total Licenses and Permits 170,000
Grant Revenue
4XXXX-HMGP
4XXXX-RSTP State 78,049
40807-ATP Funds
40808-HSIP Funds
40904-Gas Tax 2107.5
4XXXX - CRSSA 100,000
4XXXX - SWRB
40204-Transient Occupancy Tax
Total Grant Revenue 178,049 -
Misc Revenues
40550-Asset Sales
40609-Park Mitigation Fees
40613-Fire Mitigation Fees
40630-General Plan Fee
Total Licenses and Permits -
Interest Income
40700-Interest Earned 1,000
Total Interest Income 1,000
Transfers In
49999- Transfers In
Total Transfers In - -
Total Revenues and Transfer In 178,049 171,000
Expenses
Capital Outlay
52096-Capital Project 178,049
51001-Capital Outlay - Equipment
51002-Capital Outlay - Vehicle
Total Capital Outlay 178,049 -
Transfers Out
59999-Transfer out
Total Transfer Out - -
Total Expenses and Capital Outlay and TO 178,049 -
Revenue less Expenses - 171,000
44 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Capital Funds
(310) Sewer
R&R
(355) Water
Expansion
(365) Water
R&R Totals
Revenue
Licenses and Permits
43006-Sewer Connection Fee - Buildin 50,000
42007-Water Capital Improvement Fee 45,000 45,000
43010-Sewer Capital Replacement - 120,000
Total Licenses and Permits - 45,000 - 215,000
Grant Revenue
4XXXX-HMGP 900,000 900,000
4XXXX-RSTP State 78,049
40807-ATP Funds -
40808-HSIP Funds -
40904-Gas Tax 2107.5 -
4XXXX - CRSSA 100,000
4XXXX - SWRB 900,000
40204-Transient Occupancy Tax -
Total Grant Revenue 1,800,000 - - 1,978,049
Misc Revenues
40550-Asset Sales 890,000
40609-Park Mitigation Fees -
40613-Fire Mitigation Fees -
40630-General Plan Fee -
Total Licenses and Permits - - 890,000
Interest Income
40700-Interest Earned 2,700 3,700
Total Interest Income - 2,700 - 3,700
Transfers In
49999- Transfers In 1,000,000 500,000 1,500,000
Total Transfers In 1,000,000 - 500,000 1,500,000
Total Revenues and Transfer In 2,800,000 47,700 500,000 4,586,749 Expenses
Capital Outlay
52096-Capital Project 2,210,000 2,388,049
51001-Capital Outlay - Equipment - - -
51002-Capital Outlay - Vehicle -
Total Capital Outlay 2,210,000 - - 2,588,049
Transfers Out
59999-Transfer out 40,000
Total Transfer Out - - 40,000
Total Expenses and Capital Outlay and TO 2,210,000 - - 2,628,049 Revenue less Expenses 590,000 47,700 500,000 1,958,700
45 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Debt Funds 2022-23 Budget
Debt Service (315) Sewer Debt
(360) Water
Debt Totals
Revenue
Interest Income
40700-Interest Earned - 5,000 5,000
Total Interest Income - 5,000 5,000
Transfers In
49999- Transfers In 224,574 - 224,574
Total Transfers In 224,574 - 224,574
Total Revenues and Transfer In 224,574 5,000 229,574
Expenses
Debt Service
53000-Debt Service 266,992 74,468 341,460
53001-Interest Expense 77,335 - 77,335
Total Debt Service 344,327 74,468 418,795
Transfers Out
59999-Transfers Out 431,961 - 431,961
Total Transfers Out 431,961 - 431,961
Total Expenses and Capital Outlay and TO 776,288 74,468 850,756 Revenue less Expenses (551,714) (69,468) (621,182)
46 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Enterprise Funds 2022-23 Budget
Enterprise (300) Sewer O&M
(350) Water
O&M Totals
Revenue
Fines & Penalties
42003-Utility Late Fees - 12,000 12,000
43002-Utility Late Fees 8,000 - 8,000
Total Fines & Penalties 8,000 12,000 20,000
Facilities Rentals
40704-Property Rental - 1,000 1,000
Total Facilities Rentals - 1,000 1,000
Charges for Service
43000-Sewer Service Fee - O&M 3,218,697 - 3,218,697
42000-Water Service Fee - O&M - 1,867,850 1,867,850
Total Charges for Service 3,218,697 1,867,850 5,086,547 Misc Revenue
40550-Asset Sales 4,000 - 4,000
Total Misc Revenue 4,000 - 4,000
Interest Income
40700-Interest Earned 10,000 15,000 25,000
Total Interest Income 10,000 15,000 25,000
Total Revenues and Transfer In 3,240,697 1,895,850 5,136,547 Expenses
Salaries and Benefits
50000-Salaries 287,951 308,458 596,410
50001-Salaries - Part Time - 5,000 5,000
50002-Overtime 12,450 6,500 18,950
50010-Callout 5,543 6,098 11,642
50011-On-Call Pay 5,162 6,954 12,115
50017-Leave Payout 18,000 14,000 32,000
50020-Medicare 4,168 4,464 8,631
50021-FICA 17,817 19,082 36,898
50025-Health Insurance 48,082 50,775 98,857
50026-Dental & Life Insurance 5,133 5,296 10,429
50027-Vision Insurance 776 828 1,604
50028-PERS 28,400 30,516 58,915
50029-Long Term Disability 2,040 2,186 4,226
50034-Auto Allowance/Cell Phone 2,184 2,414 4,598
50037-Life Insurance 332 290 622
47 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Enterprise (300) Sewer O&M
(350) Water
O&M Totals
50038-PERSUL 48,574 54,234 102,808
50350-Workers' Compensation 21,725 31,832 53,557
Total Salaries and Benefits 508,336 548,926 1,057,262
Service and Supplies
50051-Electricity 105,938 20,074 126,012
50053-Telephone 5,500 2,600 8,100
50054-Fuel 5,500 3,300 8,800
50063-Equipment Maintenance & Repair 45,000 20,000 65,000 50064-Vehicle Maintenance & Repair 10,000 2,500 12,500
50068-Building Maintenance 10,000 2,000 12,000
50070-Tools 1,650 1,000 2,650
50071-Equipment Rental 1,000 - 1,000
50072-Safety Equipment 3,000 1,700 4,700
50074-Alarm 6,200 2,500 8,700
50076-Fire Break 3,500 - 3,500
50078-Computer/Software 1,622 1,749 3,370
50081-Outside Consultant - 500 500
50085-IT Services 500 - 500
50087-Engineering Services 81,200 81,200 162,400
50093-Stream Gauge 4,800 - 4,800
50095-Load Test Generator 3,500 2,000 5,500
50098-Cathotic Protection - 1,000 1,000
50120-Equipment R&M - Instruments 3,000 - 3,000
50152-Office Supplies 1,500 500 2,000
50153-Materials and Supplies 6,500 4,500 11,000
50159-Chlorine - 3,000 3,000
50160-Laboratory Supplies 5,000 4,500 9,500
50161-Chemicals 120,000 25,000 145,000
50162-Water Testing - 18,000 18,000
50163-Wastewater Testing 30,000 - 30,000
50301-Dues & Subscriptions 1,200 - 1,200
50302-Training & Travel 3,000 3,000 6,000
50307-Uniform Service 2,000 - 2,000
50309-DPH Compliance - 2,000 2,000
50313-Recruiting 1,000 1,000 2,000
50315-Fees 54,500 15,000 69,500
50328-Sludge Handling 25,000 - 25,000
51018-UV System Maintenance 50,000 - 50,000
52009-Monitoring Well 10,000 - 10,000
50358-Bad Debt Expense 12,000 6,000 18,000
50362-Stream Testing 12,000 - 12,000
48 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Enterprise
(300) Sewer
O&M
(350) Water
O&M Totals
50370-UPWA Water Purchase Fees - 40,000 40,000
50371-TS IRWMA Fees - 500 500
59990-Cost Allocation O&M 125,000 150,000 275,000
Total Services and Supplies 750,610 415,122 1,165,732
Capital Outlay
52096-Capital Project 75,000 - 75,000
51001-Capital Outlay - Equipment 84,000 84,000 168,000
51002-Capital Outlay - Vehicle - - -
Total Capital Outlay 159,000 84,000 243,000
Transfers Out
59999 - Transfer Out 1,224,573 500,000 1,724,573
Total Transfers Out 1,224,573 500,000 1,724,573
Total Expenses, Capital Outlay, TO 2,642,518 1,548,049 4,190,567 Revenue less Expenses 598,179 347,801 945,980
49 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Budget Detail by Department
City Council
City Attorney
Dept Requested - Dept 1000
City Officials
2022-23 Request 010
General Fund
2020-21
Actuals
2021-22
Budget
2021-22 Est
Actuals
Total Expenses $36,382 $24,536 $30,078 $28,928
50020-Medicare $261 $344 $269 $269
5 Council Members $261 $344 $269 $269
50021-FICA $1,116 $1,502 $1,153 $1,153
1,116 $1,502 $1,153 $1,153
50028-PERS $0 $688 $0 $0
0 $688 $0 $0
50056-Computers/Software $1,625 $0 $0 $0
365 1,625 $0 $0 $0
50081-Outside Consultant $0 $501 $0 $0
0 $501 $0 $0
50082-Videographer $4,800 $0 $3,500 $2,500
Council Meetings- Should look at se 4,800 $0 $3,500 $2,500 50085-IT Services $1,000 $300 $0 $100
Setup Council Meeting Systems 1,000 300 0 100
50042-Council/Commission Stipends $18,000 $16,800 $18,000 $18,000 18,000 $16,800 $18,000 $18,000
50350-Workers' Compensation $1,080 $986 $1,406 $1,406
1,080 $986 $1,406 $1,406
50152-Office Supplies $500 $455 $500 $500
500 $455 $500 $500
50218-Employee Appreciation $2,000 $1,960 $2,000 $2,000 2,000 $1,960 $2,000 $2,000
50302-Training & Travel $5,500 $1,000 $3,000 $3,000
Council Member Academy (5 @ $625 3,125 $1,000 $3,000 $3,000 Travel to Sacramento (5 @ $475 ea) 2,375
50311-Legal Notices $500 $0 $500 $0
500 $500
Total -$36,382 -$24,536 -$30,078 -$28,928
Dept Requested - Dept 1500
Attorney
2022-23 Request
010 General Fund
2020-21
Actuals
2021-22
Budget
2021-22 Est
Actuals
Total Expenses $75,000 $50,145 $205,000 $185,000
50088-Legal Attorney Services $150,000 $148,544 $180,000 $160,000 General Council Services $150,000 $148,544 $180,000 $160,000 50089-Legal Contingency $25,000 $0 $25,000 $25,000
$25,000 $0 $25,000 $25,000
59990-Cost Allocation O&M -$100,000 -$98,399 $0 $0
Allocation to Non-GF Departments -100,000 -$98,399 0
Total -$75,000 -$50,145 -$205,000 -$185,000
50 2022-23 Proposed Budget
City Engineer
Dept Requested - Dept 2000
Engineering
010 General
Fund
2022-23
Request
2020-21
Actuals
2021-22
Budget
2021-22 Est
Actuals
Total Expenses $57,685 $220,085 $131,964 $212,818 $206,818 50051-Electricity $0 $0 $1,341 $0 $0
0 $0 $1,341 $0 $0
$0
50053-Telephone $0 $0 $1,002 $0 $0
0 $0 $1,002 $0 $0
50056-Computers/Software $325 $325 $349 $0 $0
365 325 $325 $349 $0 $0
50060-Copier $0 $0 $2,819 $0 $0
0 $0 $2,819 $0 $0
50077-Equipment $0 $0 $0 $500 $500
0 $0 $0 $500 $500
50085-IT Services $0 $0 $300 $9,000 $4,000
0 $0 $300 $9,000 $4,000
50087-Engineering Services $57,360 $219,760 $125,157 $203,000 $203,000 Water Related Engineering $81,200
Wastewater Related Engineering $81,200
General Engineering/Technician 57,360 $57,360
$0
$0 125,157 203,000 203,000
50107-Solid Waste Fees $0 $0 $375 $0 $0
0 $0 $375 $0 $0
50152-Office Supplies $0 $0 $1,084 $0 $0
0 $0 $1,084 $0 $0
50311-Legal Notices $0 $0 $0 $1,000 $0
General Legal Notices 0 $0 $0 $1,000 $0
59990-Cost Allocation O&M $0 $0 -$463 -$682 -$682
0 $0 -$463 -$682 -$682
Total -$57,685 -$220,085 -$131,964 -$212,818 -$206,818
51 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Finance and Administration
Dept Requested - Dept 3000
Finance and Administration
010 General
Fund
2020-21
Actuals
2021-22
Budget
2021-22 Est
Actuals
Total Revenues $3,799,662 $4,262,995 $3,072,500 $4,026,493 40001-Secured/Unsecured Property Tax $690,000 $666,969 $650,000 $680,000 $690,000 $666,969 $650,000 $680,000
$0
40200-Sales Tax $1,302,000 $1,276,362 $840,000 $1,000,000 $1,302,000 $1,276,362 $840,000 $1,000,000
40201-Prop 172 Public Safety $640,000 $688,170 $431,000 $431,000 $640,000 $688,170 $431,000 $431,000
40202-Franchise Fees $192,000 $174,537 $192,000 $192,000 $192,000 $174,537 $192,000 $192,000
40203-Transient Occupancy Tax $540,000 $997,848 $540,000 $540,000 $540,000 $997,848 $540,000 $540,000
40205-Document Transfer Tax $20,000 $38,015 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $38,015 $20,000 $20,000
40300-Business License $38,000 $37,767 $33,000 $33,000
$38,000 $37,767 $33,000 $33,000
40501-Motor Vehicle In-Leiu Tax $300,000 $305,039 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $305,039 $300,000 $300,000
40604-Admin Fees - GHC $14,000 $14,000 $14,000 $14,000
$14,000 $14,000 $14,000 $14,000
40605-Admin Fees - School $600 $563 $1,000 $1,000
$600 $563 $1,000 $1,000
40606-Admin - LAFCO $3,600 $3,600 $3,600 $3,600
$3,600 $3,600 $3,600 $3,600
40620-Admin - LLD $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000
$5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000
40700-Interest Earned $10,000 $10,327 $10,000 $10,000
10,000 $10,327 $10,000 $10,000
40704-Property Rental $34,927 $34,926 $24,900 $24,900
Post Office 27427
Grazing Lease $7,500 $34,926 $24,900 $24,900
40714-Reimburseable $500 $9,872 $2,000 $2,000
$500 $9,872 $2,000 $2,000
40727-Legal Recovery - Starr $9,035 $0 $6,000 $60,223
Per Loan Agreement $9,035 $0 $6,000 $60,223
44032-American Rescue Plan $0 $0 $0 $473,180
$0 $0 $0 $473,180
49999-Transfers In $0 $0 $0 $473,180
American Rescue Plan $0 $0 $0 $473,180
Total Expenses $1,102,105 $1,032,788 $1,338,429 $1,375,768 50000-Salaries $399,112 $410,465 $433,638 $433,638
5 FTEs $399,112 $410,465 $433,638 $433,638
50002-Overtime $2,500 $1,028 $0 $1,000
Misc OT $2,500 $1,028 $0 $1,000
52 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Dept Requested - Dept 3000
Finance and Administration
010 General
Fund
2020-21
Actuals
2021-22
Budget
2021-22 Est
Actuals
50017-Leave Payout $10,000 $26,396 $15,336 $60,000
Misc Payouts $10,000 $26,396 $15,336 $60,000
50020-Medicare $5,787 $6,725 $6,579 $6,579
$5,787 $6,725 $6,579 $6,579
50021-FICA $24,745 $27,861 $28,134 $28,134
24,745 $27,861 $28,134 $28,134
50022-State Unemployment Insurance $0 $0 $5,000 $0
0 $0 $5,000 $0
50025-Health Insurance $66,440 $65,541 $62,837 $62,837
66,440 $65,541 $62,837 $62,837
50026-Dental & Life Insurance $7,075 $5,016 $4,544 $4,544 7,075 $5,016 $4,544 $4,544
50027-Vision Insurance $1,129 $788 $952 $952
1,129 $788 $952 $952
50028-PERS $49,176 $49,328 $44,250 $44,250
49,176 $49,328 $44,250 $44,250
50029-Long Term Disability $2,834 $2,393 $2,823 $2,823
2,834 $2,393 $2,823 $2,823
50031-Retiree Benefit $0 $0 $7,762 $7,762
$0 $7,762 $7,762
50034-Auto Allowance/Cell Phone $2,400 $5,074 $4,800 $2,500 2,400 $5,074 $4,800 $2,500
50035-Benefit Admin Fees Retiree $0 $3,809 $4,000 $4,000 $3,809 $4,000 $4,000
50037-Life Insurance $288 $256 $234 $234
288 $256 $234 $234
50038-PERSUL $112,462 $55,779 $61,268 $61,268
112,462 $55,779 $61,268 $61,268
50350-Workers' Compensation $23,947 $18,241 $27,226 $27,226 23,947 $18,241 $27,226 $27,226
50051-Electricity $739 $738 $2,000 $2,500
CPPA 739
$738 $2,000 $2,500
50052-Propane $1 $1 $2,100 $2,100
Campora 1 $1 $2,100 $2,100
50053-Telephone $2,520 $4,662 $5,500 $3,500
Cal.Net 2,520 $4,662 $5,500 $3,500
50056-Computers/Software $6,940 $1,953 $2,000 $2,000
Smartsheet 600 $1,953 $2,000 $2,000
Microsoft 365 - Was already paying $1,95 2,400
Adobe 540
Target Solutions - Moved from Fire 3400
50059-Internet/Wireless Connection $4,500 $0 $1,500 $1,500 Comcast - NEW 4,500 $0 $1,500 $1,500
Note: Was paying $1452 for City Hall Old Location
50060-Copier $7,207 $0 $0 $0
US Bank Lease 1168
WF Lease 5,004
53 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Dept Requested - Dept 3000
Finance and Administration
010 General
Fund
2020-21
Actuals
2021-22
Budget
2021-22 Est
Actuals
Zoom Lease 1035
50061-Computer Maint/Software Lease $43,974 $0 $17,800 $17,800 Springbrook (Cloud) 34974
Govinvest 9,000
$0 $17,800 $17,800
50063-Equipment Maintenance & Repair $1,330 $625 $1,800 $1,800 Cisco Annual Fire Sprinklers 80 $625 $1,800 $1,800
Angels Sheet Metal Annual 450
Misc Repairs (Door, leaks, etc.) 800
50066-Equipment Lease $631 $661 $600 $600
Pitney Bowes 631 $661 $600 $600
50068-Building Maintenance $3,000 $362 $500 $500
General Maintenance, plus door, leaks, a 3,000 $362 $500 $500 50069-Grounds Maintenance $500 $509 $750 $750
MIsc 500 $509 $750 $750
50074-Alarm $1,500 $2,274 $1,500 $1,500
Signal Service 1,500 $2,274 $1,500 $1,500
50077-Equipment $6,000 $732 $0 $0
Computers, staff equipment 2,500 $732 $0 $0
Phones 3,500
50081-Outside Consultant $79,020 $125,195 $179,400 $179,400 Dataprose - Print/mail 13,200 $125,195 $179,400 $179,400 Citygate 45,000
Website 6,500
Springbrook Migration 14,320
50085-IT Services $18,500 $3,793 $13,499 $13,499
Computerfiremen 6000
Additional IT Services 12,500 $3,793 $13,499 $13,499
50086-Audit Services $34,000 $0 $29,600 $29,600
Larry Bain 29,000 $0 $29,600 $29,600
OPEB Report 2500
SCO - Road Report 2500
50090-Codification $2,480 $1,161 $1,800 $1,800
Annual Fee 480 $1,161 $1,800 $1,800
Ordinance Updates 2000
50106-Retirement Benefit Consultants $3,500 $0 $2,100 $2,100 GASB 68 Report 1000 $0 $2,100 $2,100
OPEB Report 2500
50110-Revenue Consultant $2,500 $2,250 $6,200 $6,200
MuniServices Sale Tax Audit 2,500 $2,250 $6,200 $6,200
50111-Utilities $7,128 $6,741 $6,800 $6,800
City of Angels Water/Sewer 7,128 $6,741 $6,800 $6,800
50152-Office Supplies $5,000 $4,939 $4,250 $4,250
MIsc Office Supplies 5,000 $4,939 $4,250 $4,250
50153-Materials and Supplies $800 $777 $750 $750
Misc non-office supplies 800 $777 $750 $750
50158-Facility/Janitorial Services $1,200 $0 $1,200 $1,200 City Hall Cleaning 1,200 $0 $1,200 $1,200
54 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Dept Requested - Dept 3000
Finance and Administration
010 General
Fund
2020-21
Actuals
2021-22
Budget
2021-22 Est
Actuals
50173-Postage $3,500 $0 $4,200 $4,200
Pitney Bowes Postage 3,500 $0 $4,200 $4,200
50301-Dues & Subscriptions $2,790 $966 $1,550 $1,550
Web Domain 400
FPPC Dues 150
Calaveras Enterprise 40
GFOA x 2 650
ICMA 1400
PO Box 667 150 $966 $1,550 $1,550
50302-Training & Travel $9,000 $1,791 $4,000 $4,000
CalCities 2,500 $1,791 $4,000 $4,000
Springbrook Conferences 2,500
CSJVRMA 500
Misc Travel 500
Springbrook Training Staff 3000
50311-Legal Notices $2,500 $2,133 $1,000 $1,000
Ordinance Publishing $2,500 $2,133 $1,000 $1,000
50313-Recruiting $500 $320 $500 $500
Advertising and backgrounds $500 $320 $500 $500
50315-Fees $7,950 $45,668 $27,100 $27,100
PCI Non-Compliance 750
Civic Pay - Online Trans Fee $7,200 $45,668 $27,100 $27,100 50351-Liability Ins $265,000 $152,570 $255,937 $255,937 CSJVRMA 265,000 $152,570 $255,937 $255,937
50400-Miscellaneous $10,000 $15,000 $0 $75
Misc Appraisel/Recordings 10,000 $15,000 $0 $75
51001-Capital Outlay - Equipment $0 $1,000 $0 $0
$1,000 $0 $0
51005-Computer/Software $35,000 $0 $53,110 $53,110
Server/Network Project 35000 $0 $53,110 $53,110
53009-Penalties on Late PERS Payment $0 $0 $0 $400
$0 $0 $400
59990-Cost Allocation O&M -$175,000 -$22,733 $0 $0
Water -95000 -$22,733 $0 $0
Sewer -80000
Other
Totals $2,697,557 $3,230,207 $1,734,071 $2,650,725
55 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Community Support
Dept Requested - Dept
3002 Comm. Support
2022-23 Request 010
General Fund
2020-21
Actuals
2021-22
Budget
2021-22 Est
Actuals
Total Revenues $25,000 $0 $0 $0
40203-Transient Occupancy Tax 25,000 0 0 0
49999-Transfer In - 0 0 0
Total Expenses $109,020 $108,918 $108,950 $109,018
50081-Museum Support $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000
$50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000
50201-Community Support $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0
50202-League of Cal. Cities $3,380 $3,282 $3,300 $3,380 $3,380 $3,282 $3,300 $3,380
50207-Central Sierra RC&D $640 $636 $650 $638
640 $636 650 638
50220-DAC Support 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000
55,000 $55,000 55000 55000
Total -$84,020 -$108,918 -$108,950 -$109,018
56 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Building and Planning
Dept Requested - Dept 4000
Building/Planning
010 General
Fund
2020-21
Actuals
2021-22
Budget
2021-22 Est
Actuals
Total Revenues $376,452 $277,083 $446,452 $450,562
40301-Sign Permits $1,500 $1,774 $1,500 $1,500
$1,500 $1,774 $1,500 $1,500
40302-Home Occupancy Permit $1,500 $2,166 $1,500 $1,500 $1,500 $2,166 $1,500 $1,500
40303-Building Permits $90,000 $111,969 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $111,969 $90,000 $90,000
40304-Encroachments $3,500 $4,089 $3,500 $4,200
$3,500 $4,089 $3,500 $4,200
40307-SB 1186 Revenues $2,000 $0 $2,000 $2,000
$2,000 $0 $2,000 $2,000
40600-Planning Fees $50,000 $56,820 $50,000 $50,000
$50,000 $56,820 $50,000 $50,000
40601-Plan Check Fees $0 $0 $0 $1,610
$0 $0 $1,610
40630-Long-Range Planning Fee $0 $1,987 $0 $1,800
Long Range Planning Impact Fee $1,987 $0 $1,800
40700-Interest Earned $0 $67 $0 $0
$67 $0 $0
40714-Reimburseable $0 $10,000 $0 $0
$10,000 $0 $0
40802-LTF Funds from CCOG $0 $41,454 $0 $0
$41,454 $0 $0
44000-Grant Income $227,952 $46,757 $297,952 $297,952
SB2 Affordable Housing Grant (C $15,000
LEAP Grant (Carry Over) $35,000
Per Capita Grant (Carry Over) $177,952 $46,757 $297,952 $297,952 49999-Fund Transfer - In $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Expenses $655,691.47 $237,517 $509,124 $539,126
50000-Salaries $50,940 $44,761 $61,838 $61,838
1 FTE $50,940 $44,761 $61,838 $61,838
50002-Overtime $1,500 $1,210 $0 $500
Misc OT $1,500 $1,210 $0 $500
50017-Leave Payout $0 $0 $0 $4,464
0 $0 $0 $4,464
50020-Medicare $740 $780 $941 $941
$740 $780 $941 $941
50021-FICA $3,159 $3,353 $3,420 $3,420
$3,159 $3,353 $3,420 $3,420
50025-Health Insurance $15,147 $8,636 $13,268 $13,268
$15,147 $8,636 $13,268 $13,268
50026-Dental & Life Insurance $1,712 $928 $1,256 $1,256 57 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Dept Requested - Dept 4000
Building/Planning
010 General
Fund
2020-21
Actuals
2021-22
Budget
2021-22 Est
Actuals
$1,712 $928 $1,256 $1,256
50027-Vision Insurance $226 $9 $225 $225
$226 $9 $225 $225
50028-PERS $7,142 $7,684 $8,151 $8,151
$7,142 $7,684 $8,151 $8,151
50029-Long Term Disability $434 $267 $424 $424
$434 $267 $424 $424
50031-Retiree Benefit $0 $0 $16,605 $16,605
0 $0 $16,605 $16,605
50034-Auto Allowance/Cell Phone $480 $173 $0 $60
$480 $173 $0 $60
50037-Life Insurance $58 $44 $46 $46
$58 $44 $46 $46
50038-PERSUL $37,122 $17,167 $17,167 $17,167
$37,122 $17,167 $17,167 $17,167
50350-Workers' Compensation $3,882 $1,800 $2,583 $2,583 $3,882 $1,800 $2,583 $2,583
50042-Council/Commission Stipends $3,000 $1,550 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $1,550 $3,000 $3,000
50051-Electricity $360 $1,341 $1,500 $1,500
CPPA $360 $1,341 $1,500 $1,500
50053-Telephone $1,104 $1,094 $1,200 $1,200
Cal.Net $1,104 $1,094 $1,200 $1,200
50056-Computers/Software $2,839 $350 $500 $500
Adobe $180
Signal Service $234
365 $325 $350 $500 $500
Smartsheet $300
Parcelquest $1,800
50060-Copier $720 $4,915 $0 $500
Wells Fargo Lease $720 $4,915 $0 $500
50061-Computer Maint/Software L $350 $0 $150 $150
365 350 $0 $150 $150
50063-Equipment Maintenance & R $0 $0 $1,000 $1,000
0 $0 $1,000 $1,000
50081-Outside Consultant $260,000 $82,756 $87,000 $87,000 City Planner Contract $90,000
City Planner Task Orders (SB2, L $50,000
Code Enforcement $20,000
Building Inspector $90,000 $74,101 $80,000 $80,000
Roark Weber (City Projects and $10,000 $8,655 $7,000 $7,000 50085-IT Services $500 $375 $2,000 $2,000
$500 $375 $2,000 $2,000
50087-Engineering Services $25,000 $19,271 $0 $0
Dewberry - Planning & Building A $25,000 $19,271 $0 $0
50111-Utilities $2,040 $1,883 $1,850 $1,850
City of Angels $2,040 $1,883 $1,850 $1,850
50152-Office Supplies $1,500 $684 $2,600 $2,600
58 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Dept Requested - Dept 4000
Building/Planning
010 General
Fund
2020-21
Actuals
2021-22
Budget
2021-22 Est
Actuals
$1,500 $684 $2,600 $2,600
50301-Dues & Subscriptions $0 $1,799 $2,300 $2,300
0 $1,799 $2,300 $2,300
50302-Training & Travel $2,500 $0 $500 $500
Planning Commissioner Training $1,000
Staff Training $1,500 $0 $500 $500
50310-LAFCO Contribution $29,784 $30,479 $30,593 $30,593 2022/2023 LAFCo Contribution $29,784 $30,479 $30,593 $30,593 50311-Legal Notices $14,000 $4,170 $12,000 $12,000
Legal noticing public hearings $7,000
Ordinances Publishing $7,000 $4,170 $12,000 $12,000
50313-Recruiting $0 $0 $0 $250
0 $0 $0 $250
50366-Community Events/Meeting $500 $0 $50,000 $50,000
Building/Planning Outreach $500 $0 $50,000 $50,000
51005-Computer/Software $11,000 $0 $8,967 $8,967
Add Special Events module to M $2,000
Add Code Enforcement Module t $9,000 $0 $8,967 $8,967
52096-Capital Project $177,952 $0 $177,952 $177,952
Per Capita - Playground/Park $177,952 $0 $177,952 $177,952 59990-Cost Allocation O&M $0 $0 $0 $12,114
0 $0 $0 $12,114
59999-Transfer Out $0 $0 $0 $12,114
Transfers to GF 010 0 $0 $0 $12,114
Totals -$279,239 $39,567 -$62,672 -$88,564
59 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Fire Department
Dept Requested - Dept 6000
Fire Dept
010 General
Fund 2020-21 Actuals
2021-22
Budget
2021-22 Est
Actuals
Total Revenues $184,500 $118,590 $342,022 $300,520
40204-Transient Occupancy Tax $0 $47,668 $120,000 $120,000 $0 $47,668 $120,000 $120,000
40612-Fire Special Services $5,000 $2,628 $5,000 $2,500 $5,000 $2,628 $5,000 $2,500
40613-Fire Mitigation Fees $0 $523 $2,500 $1,200
$523 $2,500 $1,200
40700-Interest Earned $0 $0 $100 $100
$0 $100 $100
40704-Property Rental $0 $10,920 $19,000 $10,920
$0 $10,920 $19,000 $10,920
40706-Donation $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0
40714-Reimburseable $500 $8,847 $500 $200
What are these for? $500 $8,847 $500 $200
44000-Grant Income $0 $336 $59,322 $30,000
$336 $59,322 $30,000
49999-Fund Transfer - In $179,000 $47,668 $135,600 $135,600 TOT $120,000.00 $47,668.00 $120,000.00 120,000
257 Prop 172 $33,000.00 $0.00 $13,000.00 13,000
290 Fire Impact Fee $26,000 $0 $2,600 $2,600
40718-Misc Refund $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Expenses $899,773 $789,669 $1,436,792 $888,944
50000-Salaries 378,785 $145,683 $169,044 $177,547
5 FTEs 329,645 $145,683 $169,044 $177,547
1 Contracted FC 49,140
50001-Salaries - Part Time 180,960 $347,108 $398,608 $363,993 5 Extra Hires 180,960 $347,108 $398,608 $363,993
50002-Overtime 18,407 $13,127 $0 $21,953
Misc OT 10,000 $13,127 $0 $21,953
Call Out $8,407.00
50004-Fire Planned Overtime 0 $760 $4,727 $4,495
$760 $4,727 $4,495
50015-Holiday Pay 12,502 $5,689 $5,600 $5,915
12,502 $5,689 $5,600 $5,915
50017-Leave Payout 8,000 $7,488 $8,424 $0
8,000 $7,488 $8,424 $0
50020-Medicare 5,493 $6,508 $7,230 $7,894
5,493 $6,508 $7,230 $7,894
50021-FICA 23,485 $27,942 $30,947 $33,755
23,485 $27,942 $30,947 $33,755
50025-Health Insurance 59,745 $23,570 $26,984 $27,841
59,745 $23,570 $26,984 $27,841
50026-Dental & Life Insurance 5,676 $2,835 $2,998 $3,159 60 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Dept Requested - Dept 6000
Fire Dept
010 General
Fund 2020-21 Actuals
2021-22
Budget
2021-22 Est
Actuals
5,676 $2,835 $2,998 $3,159
50027-Vision Insurance 937 $458 $505 $451
937 $458 $505 $451
50028-PERS 49,980 $52,889 $60,796 $49,685
49,980 $52,889 $60,796 $49,685
50029-Long Term Disability 2,690 $523 $1,016 $1,050
2,690 $523 $1,016 $1,050
50031-Retiree Benefit 0 $0 $6,226 $0
$0 $6,226 $0
50034-Auto Allowance/Cell Phone 2,400 $404 $248 $430
2,400 $404 $248 $430
50037-Life Insurance 288 $62 $93 $153
288 $62 $93 $153
50038-PERSUL 12,708 $8,635 $10,881 $10,519
12,708 $8,635 $10,881 $10,519
50350-Workers' Compensation 28,637 $53,870 $38,038 $40,885 28,637 $53,870 $38,038 $40,885
50051-Electricity 3,500 $2,786 $3,500 $2,591
3,500 $2,786 $3,500 $2,591
50052-Propane 2,000 $1,683 $2,000 $819
2,000 $1,683 $2,000 $819
50053-Telephone 4,200 $3,597 $3,500 $4,115
4,200 $3,597 $3,500 $4,115
50054-Fuel 13,000 $0 $10,500 $0
13,000 $0 $10,500 $0
50056-Computers/Software 6,850 $1,522 $1,600 $1,466
Microsoft 365 1,950 $1,522 $1,600 $1,466
Lexipol $4,900
50060-Copier 1,600 $1,522 $1,600 $1,466
1,600 $1,522 $1,600 $1,466
50062-RMS System 630 $630 $900 $630
630 $630 $900 $630
50063-Equipment Maintenance & Re 3,000 $1,398 $3,000 $200 3,000 $1,398 $3,000 $200
50064-Vehicle Maintenance & Repai 20,000 $14,964 $20,580 $29,247 20,000 $14,964 $20,580 $29,247
50065-Radio Maintenance 1,500 $0 $1,500 $0
1,500 $0 $1,500 $0
50068-Building Maintenance 3,500 $1,981 $7,500 $8,079
3,500 $1,981 $7,500 $8,079
50069-Grounds Maintenance 1,500 $708 $1,500 $1,264
1,500 $708 $1,500 $1,264
50071-Equipment Rental 500 $431 $0 $0
500 $431 $0 $0
50072-Safety Equipment 0 $17,646 $0 $0
$17,646 $0 $0
50073-SCBA Maintenance 2,000 $0 $4,000 $0
61 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Dept Requested - Dept 6000
Fire Dept
010 General
Fund 2020-21 Actuals
2021-22
Budget
2021-22 Est
Actuals
2,000 $0 $4,000 $0
50081-Outside Consultant 700 $399 $700 $0
700 $399 $700 $0
50107-Solid Waste Fees 0 $0 $75 $0
$0 $75 $0
50111-Utilities 2,300 $2,037 $2,200 $2,196
2,300 $2,037 $2,200 $2,196
50152-Office Supplies 1,600 $2,136 $1,500 $1,570
1,600 $2,136 $1,500 $1,570
50156-Code Books 1,000 $0 $2,000 $0
1,000 $0 $2,000 $0
50157-Medical Supplies 21,500 $943 $1,500 $480
1,500 $943 $1,500 $480
Prop 172 Addl Medical Supplies 20,000
50158-Facility/Janitorial Services 2,600 $2,279 $2,000 $3,851 2,600 $2,279 $2,000 $3,851
50301-Dues & Subscriptions 100 $0 $50 $100
100 $0 $50 $100
50302-Training & Travel 5,000 $3,440 $9,500 $8,433
5,000 $3,440 $9,500 $8,433
50305-Physicals 2,500 $454 $1,500 $370
2,500 $454 $1,500 $370
50306-Fire Uniforms 4,500 $631 $3,500 $1,838
4,500 $631 $3,500 $1,838
50325-Fire Prevention 2,500 $0 $500 $0
Outreach materials 2,500 $0 $500 $0
50326-Fire Meals 1,000 $840 $500 $504
Fire Line Emergency Meals, Water 1,000 $840 $500 $504
51001-Capital Outlay - Equipment 0 $30,091 $395,000 $50,000 $30,091 $395,000 $50,000
59999-Fund Transfer - Out 0 $0 $181,922 $0
Transfers to GF 010 $0 $181,922 $0
Totals -$715,273 -$671,079 -$1,094,770 -$588,424
62 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Police
Dept Requested - Dept 6100
Police
010 General
Fund
2020-21
Actuals
2021-22
Budget
2021-22 Est
Actuals
Total Revenues $277,800 $545,075 $453,436 $229,767
40401-Traffic/Parking $150 $138 $200 $250
$150 $138 $200 $250
$0
40402-Criminal Fines $250 $202 $400 $150
$250 $202 $400 $150
40404-Parking Enforcement $10,000 $10,285 $20,000 $7,000 $10,285 $20,000 $7,000
Reduced Parking Enforcement 10,000
40503-POST Training Reimburse $2,500 $2,685 $5,000 $1,500 $2,500 $2,685 $5,000 $1,500
40507-SLESF Grant $0 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000
$100,000 $100,000 $100,000
40550-Asset Sales $0 $0 $0 $2,688
$0 $0 $2,688
40602-Park Mitigation Fees $0 $1,461 $2,500 $1,500
$1,461 $2,500 $1,500
40608-Police Special Services $3,000 $4,087 $3,000 $3,000 Expected revenue no increase $3,000 $4,087 $3,000 $3,000 407XX-CCW Fees $1,500 $237 $2,600 $250
$1,500 $237 $2,600 $250
40700-Interest Earned $0 $237 $2,600 $250
$237 $2,600 $250
40704-Property Rental $0 $18,720 $18,500 $18,720
$0 $18,720 $18,500 $18,720
40707-PD Vest Reimbursement $1,600 $834 $0 $0
Expecting the purchase and rei $1,600 $834 $0 $0
40714-Reimburseable $0 $0 $78,845 $0
$0 $0 $78,845 $0
44029-MOA PD Reimbursement C $107,066 $0 $0 $350
BH SRO $107,066 $0 $0 $350
44000-Grant Income $0 $135,672 $36,735 $94,109
No current grants in the pipelin $0 $135,672 $36,735 $94,109 40718-Misc Refund $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0
49999-Fund Transfer - In $151,734 $270,517 $183,056 $0
SLESF $100,000 $270,517 $183,056 $0
Cannabis Tx Grant (253) $0 $0 $0 $0
OTS $23,734 $0 $0 $0
Prop 172 28,000 $0 $0 $0
Total Expenses $1,996,803 $1,592,769 $2,126,562 $1,905,105 50000-Salaries $761,234 $556,049 $692,557 $715,000
8 FTEs $682,107 $556,049 $692,557 $715,000
1 SRO 65206
63 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Dept Requested - Dept 6100
Police
010 General
Fund
2020-21
Actuals
2021-22
Budget
2021-22 Est
Actuals
K9 Pay 9,423
Cell Phone 480
Stipend 4018
50001-Salaries - Part Time $30,000 $10,959 $15,292 $11,961 Increase Part-time hours and re $30,000 $10,959 $15,292 $11,961 50002-Overtime $40,000 $29,770 $44,020 $34,751
Special Event O/T added Prior $40,000 $29,770 $44,020 $34,751 50010-Callout $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0
50011-On-Call Pay $13,338 $12,078 $10,046 $15,000
Estimated but should be based $13,338 $12,078 $10,046 $15,000 50015-Holiday Pay $20,000 $18,165 $34,875 $21,594
$20,000 $18,165 $34,875 $21,594
50017-Leave Payout $10,000 $490 $12,974 $5,000
$10,000 $490 $12,974 $5,000
50020-Medicare $10,837 $9,716 $11,910 $11,627
$10,837 $9,716 $11,910 $11,627
50021-FICA $46,334 $41,714 $50,928 $49,718
46,334 $41,714 $50,928 $49,718
50025-Health Insurance $104,563 $65,209 $81,600 $77,121 104,563 $65,209 $81,600 $77,121
50026-Dental & Life Insurance $9,951 $7,774 $11,662 $8,468 9,951 $7,774 $11,662 $8,468
50027-Vision Insurance $1,388 $1,217 $1,639 $1,162
1,388 $1,217 $1,639 $1,162
50028-PERS $124,808 $100,086 $137,679 $110,576
124,808 $100,086 $137,679 $110,576
50029-Long Term Disability $5,306 $2,814 $3,896 $4,187
5,306 $2,814 $3,896 $4,187
50031-Retiree Benefit $0 $0 $10,378 $0
$0 $10,378 $0
50032-Uniform Allowance $8,750 $6,855 $8,750 $7,750
8,750 $6,855 $8,750 $7,750
50037-Life Insurance $519 $403 $421 $460
519 $403 $421 $460
50038-PERSUL $248,544 $197,523 $231,163 $223,474
248,544 $197,523 $231,163 $223,474
50350-Workers' Compensation $55,330 $26,563 $62,099 $61,184 55,330 $26,563 $62,099 $61,184
50051-Electricity $5,800 $5,117 $5,100 $5,445
Estimated Cost 5,800 $5,117 $5,100 $5,445
50052-Propane $1,500 $967 $1,300 $389
Anticipated Cost 1,500 $967 $1,300 $389
50053-Telephone $16,363 $12,588 $14,000 $12,772
MCI 552
Cal.Net 5800
64 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Dept Requested - Dept 6100
Police
010 General
Fund
2020-21
Actuals
2021-22
Budget
2021-22 Est
Actuals
AT&T 2415
Verizon 4596
CPPA 3,000 $12,588 $14,000 $12,772
50054-Fuel $30,000 $0 $25,000 $0
Fuel Trend plus 10% 30,000 $25,000
50058-Auto Lease $7,260 $7,256 $7,256 $7,256
Dodge Charger 7,260 $7,256 $7,256 $7,256
50059-Internet/Wireless Connecti $4,500 $4,876 $4,500 $6,603 Comcast 4,500 $4,876 $4,500 $6,603
50060-Copier $7,000 $4,876 $4,500 $6,603
Anticipated Cost Increase 7,000 $4,876 $4,500 $6,603
50062-RMS System $1,400 $1,200 $1,200 $0
$50 per license increase. From 1,400 $1,200 $1,200 $0
50063-Equipment Maintenance & $2,000 $964 $2,000 $0
2,000 $964 $2,000 $0
50064-Vehicle Maintenance & Rep $17,000 $9,172 $15,000 $10,322 Vehicles Aging 17,000 $9,172 $15,000 $10,322
50068-Building Maintenance $4,500 $1,911 $3,000 $800
4,500 $1,911 $3,000 $800
50069-Grounds Maintenance $0 $1,353 $1,000 $0
50068 and 50069 Combined to o 0 $1,353 $1,000 $0
Maybe consolidate to Building and Grounds Maint.
50072-Safety Equipment $8,500 $6,759 $20,130 $22,633
Taser Contract and Other Equip 8,500 $6,759 $20,130 $22,633 50078- Computer Software $4,045 $0 $1,500 $0
Unexpected Software Needs 1,000 $1,500
Social Media Software 120
365 2925
50084-Administrative Fees $600 $0 $1,000 $0
600 $0 $1,000 $0
50085-IT Services $12,000 $7,600 $5,000 $3,600
Increased IT Service Needs and 12,000 $7,600 $5,000 $3,600 500XX-DOJ Fees (CCW) $1,500 $0 $0 $0
1,500 $0 $0 $0
50099-Dispatch Contract $188,514 $172,964 $172,964 $172,964 SO Contract with 5% CPI 188,514 $172,964 $172,964 $172,964 50107-Solid Waste Fees $150 $150 $90 $150
058-014-012 75 $150 $90 $150
062-009-039 75
50111-Utilities $6,700 $6,209 $5,900 $6,660
W/WW 6,700 $6,209 $5,900 $6,660
50133-Rims License $3,187 $2,747 $2,600 $2,802
Increase of $400 due to Mobile 3,187 $2,747 $2,600 $2,802 50135-Digital Evidence Maintenan $2,566 $4,774 $2,500 $4,000 Change to"AXON BWC/Photo S 2,566 $4,774 $2,500 $4,000
50151-Range Supplies $6,000 $2,176 $6,000 $4,118
65 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Dept Requested - Dept 6100
Police
010 General
Fund
2020-21
Actuals
2021-22
Budget
2021-22 Est
Actuals
Range Supplied and Buildout 6,000 $2,176 $6,000 $4,118
50152-Office Supplies $3,500 $3,318 $3,500 $1,925
Expected expenses no increase 3,500 $3,318 $3,500 $1,925 50153-Materials and Supplies $2,000 $1,950 $1,500 $1,002 Misc. Needs 2,000 $1,950 $1,500 $1,002
50158-Facility/Janitorial Services $1,440 $1,380 $1,440 $1,080 Expected expenses no increase 1,440 $1,380 $1,440 $1,080 50301-Dues & Subscriptions $1,000 $1,198 $1,000 $170
CLETS Group, Cal Chiefs, IACP 1,000 $1,198 $1,000 $170
50302-Training & Travel $10,000 $3,004 $12,000 $5,052
Reduced. Have not expended t 10,000 $3,004 $12,000 $5,052 50311-Legal Notices $0 $85 $100 $0
$0 $85 $100 $0
50313-Recruiting $7,500 $7,520 $7,500 $4,150
Expecting Officer hiring x2 $7,500 $7,520 $7,500 $4,150 50318-Investigations $3,000 $1,939 $2,000 $557
Increase due to need for possib $3,000 $1,939 $2,000 $557 50320-POST Training $5,000 $3,229 $5,000 $1,550
Expected expenses no increase $5,000 $3,229 $5,000 $1,550 50323-PD Vests $3,000 $0 $3,000 $0
Expected expenses no increase $3,000 $0 $3,000 $0
50324-K-9 Program $7,500 $7,300 $8,500 $5,817
Reduced due to less K9 training $7,500 $7,300 $8,500 $5,817 51001-Capital Outlay - Equipment $15,000 $23,919 $0 $42,344 Range Project 15000 $23,919 $0 $42,344
51002-Capital Outlay - Vehicle $115,876 $23,919 $37,500 $42,344 Replacement vehicle needed co $70,000 $23,919 $37,500 $42,344 Vehicle Approved 2021-22 $45,876
52112- Homeless/Mentally Ill Outr $0 $0 $10,394 $0
59999- Transfer Out $0 $0 $136,735 $0
To General Fund $0 $136,735 $0
Totals -$1,719,003 -$1,047,694 -$1,673,126 -$1,675,338
66 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Public Works
Dept Requested - Dept 7010
Public Works Operations
010 General
Fund
2020-21
Actuals
2021-22
Budget
2021-22 Est
Actuals
Total Revenues $408,996 $437,420 $723,659 $711,297
40504-Highway 49 Street Cleaning $4,600 $0 $4,600 $4,622 $4,600 $0 $4,600 $4,622
$0
40602-Park Mitigation Fees $0 $5,633 $9,000 $14,500
Misc Improvement and In Lieu $5,633 $9,000 $14,500
40614-Banner/Event Fees $500 $482 $500 $485
Misc Banner Placement $500 $482 $500 $485
40700-Interest Earned $0 $595 $100 $600
Interest Less Bank Charges $595 $100 $600
40704-Property Rental $9,390 $6,754 $18,890 $9,890
Pickled porch $9,390 $6,754 $18,890 $9,890
40714-Reimburseable $0 $52 $0 $0
$0 $52 $0 $0
40717-Park Shelter Rental $1,000 $902 $1,000 $750
Misc Park Cover Rental $1,000 $902 $1,000 $750
40802-LTF Funds from CCOG $0 $0 $40,000 $40,000
Annual CCOG Reimbursement $0 $40,000 $40,000
40900-Gas Tax 2103 $0 $27,507 $33,922 $29,500
Based on per capita $27,507 $33,922 $29,500
40901-Gas Tax 2105 $0 $21,005 $22,104 $21,250

11.5% of tax revenues in excess of 9 cts/gal $21,005 $22,104 $21,250 40902-Gas Tax 2106 $0 $25,067 $27,414 $26,000
Allocation based on population $25,067 $27,414 $26,000
40903-Gas Tax 2107 $0 $28,423 $28,129 $25,700
Allocation based on population $28,423 $28,129 $25,700
40904-Gas Tax 2107.5 $0 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000
$1000 per year (based on population) $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 44000-Grant Income $100,000 $300,000 $400,000 $400,000
CRSSA 100,000 $300,000 $400,000 $400,000
49999-Fund Transfer - In $293,506 $20,000 $137,000 $137,000 TOT - Tourism - Museum Bathrooms $7,000 $0 $137,000 $137,000 TOT - Roads $120,000 $20,000
LTF $40,000 $0
Street Gas Tax (205) $126,506
Total Expenses $457,885.56 $208,783 $1,083,407 $373,480 50000-Salaries $59,190 $59,913 $83,030 $83,000
6 FTE $58,890 $59,913 $83,030 $83,000
Uniforms 300
50002-Overtime $2,000 $3,980 $8,842 $8,400
$2,000 $3,980 $8,842 $8,400
50010-Callout $1,630 $760 $741 $1,200
$1,630 $760 $741 $1,200
50011-On-Call Pay $2,071 $6,008 $3,464 $15,250
$2,071 $6,008 $3,464 $15,250
50017-Leave Payout $1,000 $739 $0 $0
67 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Dept Requested - Dept 7010
Public Works Operations
010 General
Fund
2020-21
Actuals
2021-22
Budget
2021-22 Est
Actuals
$1,000 $739 $0 $0
50020-Medicare $850 $1,221 $1,399 $1,513
$850 $1,221 $1,399 $1,513
50021-FICA $3,632 $5,277 $5,983 $6,469
3,632 $5,277 $5,983 $6,469
50025-Health Insurance $9,856 $10,879 $31,437 $13,480
9,856 $10,879 $31,437 $13,480
50026-Dental & Life Insurance $953 $1,209 $3,127 $1,332 953 $1,209 $3,127 $1,332
50027-Vision Insurance $175 $238 $486 $237
175 $238 $486 $237
50028-PERS $6,775 $9,080 $16,532 $9,000
6,775 $9,080 $16,532 $9,000
50029-Long Term Disability $416 $320 $927 $600
416 $320 $927 $600
50034-Auto Allowance/Cell Phone $576 $319 $396 $450
576 $319 $396 $450
50037-Life Insurance $69 $75 $130 $100
69 $75 $130 $100
50038-PERSUL $22,602 $0 $2,082 $8,282
22,602 $0 $2,082 $8,282
50350-Workers' Compensation $4,429 $8,000 $11,330 $8,191 4,429 $8,000 $11,330 $8,191
50051-Electricity $3,348 $553 $3,100 $584
3,348 $553 $3,100 $584
50052-Propane $1,000 $0 $800 $0
1,000 $0 $800 $0
50053-Telephone $3,000 $2,634 $2,650 $2,834
3,000 $2,634 $2,650 $2,834
50055-Street Lights $34,946 $35,007 $40,000 $32,357
34,946 $35,007 $40,000 $32,357
50056-Computers/Software $1,955 $0 $500 $0
MIcrosoft 365 455 $0 $500 $0
Computers for staff (GF, W, WW) 1,500
50063-Equipment Maintenance & Rep $5,500 $1,337 $2,600 $800 Park Repairs 2,000 $1,337 $2,600 $800
Misc Repairs 2,000
Tractor Repair 1500
50064-Vehicle Maintenance & Repair $1,000 $210 $0 $340
1,000 $210 $0 $340
50068-Building Maintenance $4,700 $5,828 $4,700 $2,500
4,700 $5,828 $4,700 $2,500
50069-Grounds Maintenance $2,000 $1,207 $1,850 $550
2,000 $1,207 $1,850 $550
50070-Tools $2,000 $104 $2,000 $150
2,000 $104 $2,000 $150
50071-Equipment Rental $1,600 $2,423 $1,600 $1,300
1,600 $2,423 $1,600 $1,300
68 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Dept Requested - Dept 7010
Public Works Operations
010 General
Fund
2020-21
Actuals
2021-22
Budget
2021-22 Est
Actuals
50072-Safety Equipment $1,500 $1,460 $1,500 $1,275
1,500 $1,460 $1,500 $1,275
50074-Alarm $2,000 $1,345 $2,000 $1,730
2,000 $1,345 $2,000 $1,730
50075-Street Signs $15,000 $511 $40,000 $200
Road Closure Signs 15,000 $511 $40,000 $200
50077-Equipment $26,100 $4,048 $1,100 $715
1,100 $4,048 $1,100 $715
Misc PW Equipment 25,000
50081-Outside Consultant $172,200 $16,170 $11,200 $14,750 Hazard Trees 12,200 $16,170 $11,200 $14,750
LTF Road Work 40,000
Road Maintenance 100,000
Sidewalk Repairs 20,000
50107-Solid Waste Fees $113 $332 $113 $332
113 $332 $113 $332
50111-Utilities $27,000 $34,112 $25,000 $42,986
27,000 $34,112 $25,000 $42,986
50152-Office Supplies $500 $890 $500 $675
500 $890 $500 $675
50153-Materials and Supplies $15,000 $2,065 $5,600 $2,880 Road Base 15,000 $2,065 $5,600 $2,880
50301-Dues & Subscriptions $500 $548 $500 $130
500 $548 $500 $130
50302-Training & Travel $4,000 $268 $4,000 $580
4,000 $268 $4,000 $580
50307-Uniform Service $6,700 $3,241 $2,700 $2,000
40/40/20 W/WW/GF $6,700 $3,241 $2,700 $2,000
50313-Recruiting $0 $0 $0 $0
$0
51001-Capital Outlay - Equipment $10,000 $0 $395,000 $68,205 Boom Mower $10,000 $395,000 $68,205
51042-Park Acquisition $0 $4,550 $0 $410
$4,550 $0 $410
52096-Capital Project $0 $0 $395,000 $68,205
$0 $395,000 $68,205
59990-Cost Allocation O&M $0 -$18,078 -$30,512 -$30,512 -$18,078 -$30,512 -$30,512
59999-Transfers Out $0 $0 $0 $0
Gas Tax 205
LTF
Totals -$48,890 $228,637 -$359,748 $337,817
69 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Enterprise Budgets
Sewer O&M 2022-23 Budget
Dept Requested - Dept 8000
Sewer O&M 300 Sewer O&M
2020-21
Actuals 2021-22 Budget
2021-22 Est
Actuals
Total Revenues $3,240,697 $2,817,617 $2,356,600 $3,008,123 40700-Interest Earned $10,000 $13,520 $10,000 $0
$10,000 $13,520 $10,000
40714-Reimburseable $0 $90 $0 $0
$90
43000-Sewer Service Fee - O&M $3,218,697 $2,759,514 $2,330,600 $2,982,326 $3,218,697 $2,759,514 $2,330,600 $2,982,326
43002-Utility Late Fees $8,000 $0 $8,000 $0
$8,000 $0 $8,000
43008-Title 22 - Greenhorn Creek $0 $44,493 $0 $17,797
$44,493 $17,797
40550-Asset Sales $4,000 $0 $4,000 $4,000
$4,000 $4,000 $4,000
49999 - Transfer In $0 $0 $4,000 $4,000
From Sewer O&M Fund 300 $0 $4,000 $4,000
Total Expenses $2,642,518.44 $754,501 $1,335,150 $938,072 50000-Salaries $287,951 $175,151 $246,967 $181,891
6 FTE Dept 7010 67,737 175,151 246,967 181,891
2 FTE Dept 8000 57,106
4 FTE Dept 8001 163,109
50001-Salaries - Part Time $0 $0 $0 $3,329
$0 $0 $3,329
50002-Overtime $12,450 $604 $4,575 $6,647
6 FTE Dept 7010 2300
2 FTE Dept 8000 4450
3 FTE Dept 8001 $5,700 $604 $4,575 $6,647
50010-Callout $5,543 $956 $4,385 $2,166
2 FTE Dept 8000 1608.675
6 FTE Dept 7010 1874.04
3 FTE Dept 8001 $2,061 $956 $4,385 $2,166
50011-On-Call Pay $5,162 $3,835 $6,250 $3,318
2 FTE Dept 8000 812.57
6 FTE Dept 7010 2381.42
3 FTE Dept 8001 $1,968 $3,835 $6,250 $3,318
50017-Leave Payout $18,000 $18,414 $10,000 $20,751
$18,000 $18,414 $10,000 $20,751
50020-Medicare $4,168 $2,659 $3,814 $2,310
6 FTE Dept 7010 977
2 FTE Dept 8000 825 2,659 3,814 2,310
4 FTE Dept 8001 2,366
50021-FICA $17,817 $11,441 $16,311 $10,185
6 FTE Dept 7010 4,177
2 FTE Dept 8000 3,527 11,441 16,311 10,185
4 FTE Dept 8001 10,112
50025-Health Insurance $48,082 $29,323 $40,650 $31,846
6 FTE Dept 7010 11,335 29,323 40,650 31,846
2 FTE Dept 8000 7,489
70 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Dept Requested - Dept 8000
Sewer O&M 300 Sewer O&M
2020-21
Actuals 2021-22 Budget
2021-22 Est
Actuals
4 FTE Dept 8001 29,258
50026-Dental & Life Insurance $5,133 $4,040 $4,100 $3,835 6 FTE Dept 7010 1,096 4,040 4,100 3,835
2 FTE Dept 8000 619
4 FTE Dept 8001 3,418
50027-Vision Insurance $776 $613 $867 $532
6 FTE Dept 7010 201 $613 $867 $532
2 FTE Dept 8000 116
4 FTE Dept 8001 459
50028-PERS $28,400 $20,129 $28,438 $17,948
6 FTE Dept 7010 7,791 20,129 28,438 17,948
2 FTE Dept 8000 4,318
4 FTE Dept 8001 16,291
50029-Long Term Disability $2,040 $998 $1,473 $1,203
6 FTE Dept 7010 478 998 1,473 1,203
2 FTE Dept 8000 404
4 FTE Dept 8001 1,158
50031-Retiree Benefit $0 $0 $2,274 $2,274
$0 $2,274 $2,274
50034-Auto Allowance/Cell Phone $2,184 $643 $908 $657
6 FTE Dept 7010 662 643 908 657
2 FTE Dept 8000 427
4 FTE Dept 8001 1,094
50037-Life Insurance $332 $149 $183 $164
6 FTE Dept 7010 148 $149 $183 $164
2 FTE Dept 8000 52
4 FTE Dept 8001 132
50038-PERSUL $48,574 $53,406 $44,483 $44,483
6 FTE Dept 7010 25,992 53,406 44,483 44,483
2 FTE Dept 8000 487
4 FTE Dept 8001 22,095
50350-Workers' Compensation $21,725 $0 $19,922 $16,841
6 FTE Dept 7010 5,094 0 19,922 16,841
2 FTE Dept 8000 4,300
4 FTE Dept 8001 12,331
50051-Electricity $105,938 $117,464 $118,000 $98,091
105,938 $117,464 $118,000 $98,091
50053-Telephone $5,500 $4,426 $5,000 $5,325
5,500 $4,426 $5,000 $5,325
50054-Fuel $5,500 $0 $5,500 $0
5,500 $0 $5,500 $0
50063-Equipment Maintenance & Re $45,000 $33,699 $61,000 $16,115 45,000 $33,699 $61,000 $16,115
50064-Vehicle Maintenance & Repa $10,000 $3,278 $5,500 $1,099 10,000 $3,278 $5,500 $1,099
50068-Building Maintenance $10,000 $3,631 $14,000 $1,016 10,000 $3,631 $14,000 $1,016
50070-Tools $1,650 $1,134 $1,650 $655
1,650 $1,134 $1,650 $655
50071-Equipment Rental $1,000 $389 $1,000 $70
1,000 $389 $1,000 $70
71 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Dept Requested - Dept 8000
Sewer O&M 300 Sewer O&M
2020-21
Actuals 2021-22 Budget
2021-22 Est
Actuals
50072-Safety Equipment $3,000 $1,399 $2,600 $3,095
3,000 $1,399 $2,600 $3,095
50074-Alarm $6,200 $4,484 $6,200 $5,956
6,200 $4,484 $6,200 $5,956
50076-Fire Break $3,500 $0 $3,000 $0
3,500 $0 $3,000 $0
50078-Computer/Software $1,622 $0 $1,500 $0
365 7010 523.25
365 8000 357.5
365 8001 741 $0 $1,500 $0
50085-IT Services $500 $0 $500 $300
500 $0 $500 $300
50087-Engineering Services $81,200 $0 $800 $0
81,200 $0 $800 $0
50093-Stream Gauge $4,800 $4,800 $4,800 $2,400
4,800 $4,800 $4,800 $2,400
50095-Load Test Generator $3,500 $0 $3,000 $0
3,500 $3,000 $0
50120-Equipment R&M - Instrument $3,000 $0 $3,000 $0
3,000 $3,000 $0
50152-Office Supplies $1,500 $1,245 $1,000 $1,281
1,500 $1,245 $1,000 $1,281
50153-Materials and Supplies $6,500 $940 $6,500 $1,095
6,500 $940 $6,500 $1,095
50160-Laboratory Supplies $5,000 $4,712 $5,000 $4,243
5,000 $4,712 $5,000 $4,243
50161-Chemicals $120,000 $127,716 $120,000 $120,000
120,000 $127,716 $120,000 $120,000
50163-Wastewater Testing $30,000 $26,347 $57,000 $21,008 30,000 $26,347 $57,000 $21,008
50301-Dues & Subscriptions $1,200 $891 $1,200 $204
1,200 $891 $1,200 $204
50302-Training & Travel $3,000 $472 $3,000 $253
3,000 $472 $3,000 $253
50307-Uniform Service $2,000 $1,831 $2,000 $1,108
Look at $2,000 $1,831 $2,000 $1,108
50313-Recruiting $1,000 $982 $300 $665
$1,000 $982 $300 $665
50315-Fees $54,500 $32,505 $54,500 $54,938
Spray Field 23500
Other $31,000 $32,505 $54,500 $54,938
50328-Sludge Handling $25,000 $7,553 $25,000 $13,020
$25,000 $7,553 $25,000 $13,020
51018-UV System Maintenance $50,000 $42,420 $50,000 $36,721 $50,000 $42,420 $50,000 $36,721
52009-Monitoring Well $10,000 $9,822 $18,000 $5,034
$10,000 $9,822 $18,000 $5,034
50358-Bad Debt Expense $12,000 $0 $12,000 $12,000
$12,000 $0 $12,000 $12,000
50362-Stream Testing $12,000 $0 $12,000 $12,000
12,000 $0 $12,000 $12,000
72 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Dept Requested - Dept 8000
Sewer O&M 300 Sewer O&M
2020-21
Actuals 2021-22 Budget
2021-22 Est
Actuals
52121-EQ Basin Level Sensor $0 $0 $20,000 $20,000
TBD - CIP 0 $0 $20,000 $20,000
52139-Sludge Handling & Storage $0 $0 $160,000 $35,000
Completed 0 $0 $160,000 $35,000
51001-Capital Outlay - Equipment 84,000
1/2 ton Truck 50/50 w/ww 32,500
1/2 ton diesel for hydro pull 51,500
52156-Programmable Logic Control $75,000 $0 $75,000 $75,000 2022 Project 75,000 $0 $75,000 $75,000
52155- Grit Removal $0 $0 $20,000 $20,000
TBD - CIP $0 $20,000 $20,000
59990-Cost Allocation O&M 125,000
To General Fund 125000
59999 - Transfer Out $1,224,573 $0 $20,000 $20,000
Transfer to CIP 1,000,000 $0 $20,000 $20,000
Pay Off Water Loans -
Debt Service Transfer 224573
Total $598,179 $2,063,116 $1,021,450 $2,070,051
73 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Water O&M 2022-23 Budget
Dept Requested - Dept 8001
Water O&M
2022-23 Request 350
Water O&M
2020-21
Actuals
2021-22
Budget
2021-22 Est
Actuals
Total Revenues $1,895,850 $1,664,533 $1,560,600 $1,860,434 40700-Interest Earned $15,000 $23,352 $15,000 $15,000
$15,000 $23,352 $15,000 $15,000
40704-Property Rental $1,000 $1,000 $0 $0
$1,000 $1,000 $0
42000-Water Service Fee - O&M $1,867,850 $1,601,381 $1,533,600 $1,845,434 $1,867,850 $1,601,381 $1,533,600 $1,845,434
42003-Utility Late Fees $12,000 $0 $12,000 $0
$12,000 $0 $12,000 $0
44000-Grant Income $0 $38,800 $0 $0
$38,800 $0 $0
Total Expenses $1,548,049 $390,981 $471,431 $393,042
50000-Salaries $308,458 $118,296 $157,896 $142,547
6 FTEs for Dept 7010 $94,242 $118,296 $157,896 $142,547 2 FTES Dept 8000 71,138
4 FTES Dept 8001 143,078
50001-Salaries - Part Time $5,000 $0 $0 $3,329
$5,000 $0 $0 $3,329
50002-Overtime $6,500 $525 $2,925 $4,945
$6,500 $525 $2,925 $4,945
50010-Callout $6,098 $510 $1,258 $1,486
6 FTEs for Dept 7010 2,607
2 FTES Dept 8000 2,006
4 FTES Dept 8001 1,485 $510 $1,258 $1,486
50011-On-Call Pay $6,954 $3,836 $6,250 $3,318
6 FTEs for Dept 7010 3,313
2 FTES Dept 8000 1,915
4 FTES Dept 8001 $1,726 $3,836 $6,250 $3,318
50017-Leave Payout $14,000 $11,773 $0 $13,267
$14,000 $11,773 $0 $13,267
50020-Medicare $4,464 $1,910 $2,449 $1,885
6 FTEs for Dept 7010 $1,359 $1,910 $2,449 $1,885
2 FTES Dept 8000 1,030
4 FTES Dept 8001 2,075
50021-FICA $19,082 $8,214 $10,472 $8,512
6 FTEs for Dept 7010 5,812 $8,214 $10,472 $8,512
2 FTES Dept 8000 4,399
4 FTES Dept 8001 8,871
50025-Health Insurance $50,775 $14,932 $25,989 $21,750
6 FTEs for Dept 7010 15,770 $14,932 $25,989 $21,750
2 FTES Dept 8000 9,340
4 FTES Dept 8001 25,665
50026-Dental & Life Insurance $5,296 $2,094 $2,621 $2,503 6 FTEs for Dept 7010 1,525 $2,094 $2,621 $2,503
2 FTES Dept 8000 773
4 FTES Dept 8001 2,998
50027-Vision Insurance $828 $341 $554 $361
6 FTEs for Dept 7010 280 $341 $554 $361
2 FTES Dept 8000 144
4 FTES Dept 8001 404
74 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Dept Requested - Dept 8001
Water O&M
2022-23 Request 350
Water O&M
2020-21
Actuals
2021-22
Budget
2021-22 Est
Actuals
50028-PERS $30,516 $14,928 $18,182 $14,510
6 FTEs for Dept 7010 10,840 $14,928 $18,182 $14,510
2 FTES Dept 8000 5,385
4 FTES Dept 8001 14,291
50029-Long Term Disability $2,186 $691 $942 $828
6 FTEs for Dept 7010 666 $691 $942 $828
2 FTES Dept 8000 504
4 FTES Dept 8001 1,016
50031-Retiree Benefit $0 $0 $1,876 $1,876
$0 $1,876 $1,876
50034-Auto Allowance/Cell Phone $2,414 $411 $580 $450
6 FTEs for Dept 7010 922 $411 $580 $450
2 FTES Dept 8000 533
4 FTES Dept 8001 960
50037-Life Insurance $290 $93 $117 $105
6 FTEs for Dept 7010 111 $93 $117 $105
2 FTES Dept 8000 64
4 FTES Dept 8001 115
50038-PERSUL $54,234 $72,946 $44,483 $44,483
6 FTEs for Dept 7010 36,163 $72,946 $44,483 $44,483
2 FTES Dept 8000 607
4 FTES Dept 8001 17,464
50350-Workers' Compensation $31,832 $13,990 $12,737 $0
6 FTEs for Dept 7010 7,087 $13,990 $12,737
2 FTES Dept 8000 5,364
4 FTES Dept 8001 19,382
50051-Electricity $20,074 $19,128 $18,000 $18,587
20,074 $19,128 $18,000 $18,587
50053-Telephone $2,600 $2,213 $3,000 $2,516
2,600 $2,213 $3,000 $2,516
50054-Fuel $3,300 $0 $3,000 $3,000
3,300 $0 $3,000 $3,000
50063-Equipment Maintenance & Repa $20,000 $7,183 $15,000 $18,934 20,000 $7,183 $15,000 $18,934
50064-Vehicle Maintenance & Repair $2,500 $482 $1,500 $931 2,500 $482 $1,500 $931
50068-Building Maintenance $2,000 $928 $2,000 $252
2,000 $928 $2,000 $252
50070-Tools $1,000 $1,033 $1,000 $1,000
1,000 $1,033 $1,000 $1,000
50072-Safety Equipment $1,700 $239 $1,700 $585
1,700 $239 $1,700 $585
50074-Alarm $2,500 $1,632 $2,000 $2,448
2,500 $1,632 $2,000 $2,448
50078-Computer/Software $1,749 $0 $2,500 $2,500
7010 365 936 $0
8000 365 254 $0
8001 365 559 $0 $2,500 $2,500
50081-Outside Consultant $500 $0 $500 $0
500 $0 $500 $0
50087-Engineering Services 81,200
81,200
50095-Load Test Generator $2,000 $0 $1,600 $0
75 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Dept Requested - Dept 8001
Water O&M
2022-23 Request 350
Water O&M
2020-21
Actuals
2021-22
Budget
2021-22 Est
Actuals
2,000 $0 $1,600 $0
50097-Tank Cleaning Inspection $0 $0 $4,000 $0
0 $0 $4,000 $0
50098-Cathotic Protection $1,000 $0 $1,000 $0
1,000 $0 $1,000 $0
50152-Office Supplies $500 $0 $300 $157
500 $0 $300 $157
50153-Materials and Supplies $4,500 $0 $3,000 $0
MIsc 3,000 $0 $3,000 $0
Conservation Supplies 1,500
50159-Chlorine $3,000 $1,416 $2,500 $2,439
3,000 $1,416 $2,500 $2,439
50160-Laboratory Supplies $4,500 $897 $4,500 $2,175
4,500 $897 $4,500 $2,175
50161-Chemicals $25,000 $20,371 $22,000 $18,778
25,000 $20,371 $22,000 $18,778
50162-Water Testing $18,000 $17,263 $18,000 $10,858
18,000 $17,263 $18,000 $10,858
50301-Dues & Subscriptions $0 $172 $1,000 $504
$172 $1,000 $504
50302-Training & Travel $3,000 $194 $3,000 $250
3,000 $194 $3,000 $250
50307-Uniform Service $0 $1,831 $2,000 $1,108
Look at across GF/W/WW 40/40/20 $0 $1,831 $2,000 $1,108 50309-DPH Compliance $2,000 $111 $2,000 $0
$2,000 $111 $2,000 $0
50313-Recruiting $1,000 $111 $500 $665
$1,000 $111 $500 $665
50315-Fees $15,000 $10,087 $20,000 $13,000
$15,000 $10,087 $20,000 $13,000
50358-Bad Debt Expense $6,000 $0 $6,000 $6,000
$6,000 $0 $6,000 $6,000
50370-UPWA Water Purchase Fees $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $20,000 $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $20,000
50371-TS IRWMA Fees $500 $200 $500 $200
$500 $200 $500 $200
51001-Capital Outlay - Equipment $84,000 $0 $0 $0
1/2 ton Truck 50/50 w/ww 32,500
1/2 ton diesel for hydro pull 51,500
59990-Cost Allocation O&M 150,000
GF Allocation 150,000
59999 - Transfer Out $500,000 $0 $0 $0
To Fund 365
$500,000
Total $347,801 $1,273,552 $1,089,169 $1,467,392
76 2022-23 Proposed Budget
Position Allocation
Financial Management Policy
A. General Financial Goals
The general financial goals of the City of Angels are:

1. To maintain a financially viable City that provides an adequate level of municipal services.

2. To maintain financial flexibility in order to be able to continually adapt to local and regional economic changes.

3. To maintain and enhance the sound fiscal condition of the City.

B. Budget Administration

1. The City will strive to adopt a balanced budget by June 30 preceding the budget period. A balanced budget means that operating revenues must fully cover operating expenditures, including debt service, as set forth in B.6. below. A balanced budget allows for total expenditures to exceed revenues; however, beginning fund balance and strategic reserve funds can only be used to fund capital improvement projects or other one-time, non-recurring expenditures, as set forth in B.10. below.

2. The City will prepare a budget calendar no later than the 1st City Council meeting of February preceding the budget Positions FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2022A FY 2023C FY 2023
Adopted Final Amended Changes Proposed
General Fund Departments
General Fund Departments
City Council 5 5 0 0 5
City Attorney 0 0 0 0 0
City Engineering 0 0 0 0 0
Finance & Administration 5 5 0 0 5
Building & Planning 1 1 0 0 1
Special Revenue Fund Departments
Strike Team 0 0 0 0 0
Public Works 6 6 0 0 6
Enterprise Fund Departments
Water 4 4 0 0 4
Wastewater 2 2 0 0 2
Sworn and Safety Positions
Police 9 9 0 0 9
Fire Department 3 3 3 0 6
Totals 35 35 3 0 38
77 2022-23 Proposed Budget
period.

3. The City will use a budget development process that emphasizes long-range planning and effective program management. The process will:
a. Reinforce the importance of long-range planning in managing the City's fiscal affairs. b. Focus on developing and budgeting for the accomplishment of significant goals. c. Establish realistic timeframes for achieving goals.
d. Create a proactive budget that provides for stable operations and assures the City's long-term fiscal health. e. Promote orderly spending patterns.

4. During the budget development process, the existing budget will be thoroughly examined to assure removal or reduction of any services or programs that could be eliminated or reduced in cost.

5. The City will avoid budgetary and accounting procedures that balance the current budget at the expense of future budgets.

6. The City will strive to support current operating expenditures, including debt service, with current revenues.

7. The City will have to goal to implement a forecasting practice for its revenues and expenditures for each of the succeeding five years to be updated annually.

8. The status of major program goals will be formally reported to the City Council on a periodic, ongoing basis.

9. The City Council will review and amend appropriations, if necessary, on a periodic, ongoing basis.

10. The City will strive to preserve the spending of fund balance and strategic reserve funds for capital improvement projects, or other one-time, non-recurring expenditures.

11. Unspent, unencumbered operating and capital improvement program appropriations will lapse at the end of the budget period. Requests for lapsed program appropriations may be resubmitted for inclusion in the subsequent budget period. Unspent but encumbered appropriations at the end of the budget period shall amend the budget of the subsequent period by means of a budget amendment approved by the City Council.

C. General Revenue Management

1. The City will seek to maintain a diversified and stable revenue base to protect it from short-term fluctuations in any one revenue source.

2. The City will have the goal to emphasize and facilitate long-range financial planning; the City will have the goal to maintain current projections of revenues for the succeeding five years.

3. Because revenues, especially those of the General Fund, are sensitive to both local and regional economic conditions, revenue estimates adopted by the City Council must be conservative. 78 Proposed Budget 2022-23

4. The City will annually review the General Fund operating position (revenues less expenditures) to determine if funds are available to operate and maintain future capital facilities. If funding is not available for operations and maintenance expenses, the City will evaluate all viable options.

5. User fees will be reviewed and updated on a periodic basis to recover the full cost of services provided, except when the City Council determines that a subsidy from the General Fund is within the cost recovery policy adopted by the Council. The City will strive to establish a master fee schedule that will encompass all fees and charges of the City.

6. Any transfers between funds for operating purposes shall be clearly set forth in the Adopted Budget. These operating transfers, under which financial resources are transferred from one fund to another, are distinctly different from interfund borrowings, which are usually made for temporary cash flow reasons and are not intended to result in a transfer of financial resources by the end of the fiscal year. From time to time, interfund borrowings may be appropriate but are subject to the following criteria:
a. The Finance Director is authorized to approve temporary interfund borrowings for cash flow purposes whenever the cash shortfall is expected to be resolved within 60 days. The most common use of interfund borrowing under this circumstance is for grant programs where costs are incurred before drawdowns are initiated and received.
b. Any other interfund borrowings for cash flow or other purposes require approval by the City Council.

D. Utility Rates and Fees

1. The City will set utility rates and user fees at levels that fully recover the total direct and indirect costs of the activity. Indirect costs include the costs of operations, capital outlay, debt service and annual depreciation of capital assets.

2. The City will review and adjust utility rates and user charges as required to ensure that they remain appropriate and equitable.

E. Investments

1. The Finance Director will submit an investment policy to the City Council for review and adoption.

F. Expenditures

1. The City will maintain a level of expenditures that will provide for the public well-being and safety of the residents of the community.

2. The City will provide a level of expenditures that will maintain the public assets. 79 Proposed Budget 2022-23

3. The City will maintain purchasing methods, in accordance with law and the City's adopted purchasing policies and procedures, to secure the lowest price consistent with the quality desirable for use intended and the needs of the City.

4. The City Council will annually adopt a resolution establishing the City's appropriations limit calculated in accordance with Article XIII-B of the Constitution of the State of California, Section 7900 of the State of California Government Code, and any other voter approved amendments or state legislation that affects the City's appropriations limit. The Council will generally consider this resolution in connection with final approval of the City's budget.

G. Capital Improvement Program

1. The City will develop a five-year capital improvement program (CIP) each budget cycle. The purpose of the CIP is to systematically plan, schedule and finance capital projects to ensure cost-effectiveness as well as conformance with the City's established policies.

2. Questions to consider when prioritizing a capital project include:
a. Is it mandated?
b. Is there an emergency need?
c. Is there a direct or indirect economic benefit?
d. Is there full or partial funding?
e. Does it dovetail with other capital projects that are a priority for other reasons? f. How does it fit in with the City Council's strategic goals?

1. The City will identify the estimated costs, potential funding sources, and project schedule for each capital project proposal in the CIP before it is submitted to the City Council for approval.

2. The City will coordinate the development of the CIP with the development of the operating budget.

3. Construction projects that cost $20,000 or more and equipment purchases that cost $10,000 or more will be included in the CIP, except for replacements of police squad cars which are included in the operating program budget. Minor capital construction outlays of less than $20,000 and minor equipment purchases of less than $10,000 will be included in the operating program budgets.

4. The City will make all capital improvements in accordance with an adopted and funded CIP.

5. Cost tracking procedures for current-period components of the CIP will be implemented and updated quarterly to ensure project completion is within budget and established timelines. 80 Proposed Budget 2022-23
H. Fund Balance and Reserves

1. The City will strive to maintain a fund balance in the General Fund, including the General Fund's Strategic Reserve Fund, of at least 25 percent of General Fund operating expenditures. A 25-percent fund balance is equivalent to approximately three months of operating expenditures. The primary purpose of this minimum fund balance is to meet cash flow requirements, to protect the City's essential service programs and funding requirements during periods of economic uncertainty, local disasters, other financial hardships or downturns in the local economy, and to provide for unforeseen operating or capital needs. Additionally, a fund balance of 25 percent is considered the minimum level necessary to maintain the City's credit worthiness.

2. The City Council may assign specific fund balance levels for future development of capital projects that it has determined to be in the best long-term interests of the City.

3. The City's enterprise funds will strive to maintain a minimum working capital balance of at least 25 percent of operating expenses. The primary purpose of this balance is to set aside funds to maintain cash balances sufficient to pay expenses as needed and to provide for unanticipated or emergency expenses that could not be reasonably foreseen during the preparation of the budget.

4. In addition to the assigned balances noted above, levels of fund balance and retained earnings will be sufficient to meet:
a. Debt service reserve requirements.
b. Reserves for encumbrances.
c. Established rate stabilization reserves.
d. Funding requirements for projects approved in prior years that are carried forward. e. Other assignments required by contractual obligations, state law or generally accepted accounting principles.

K. Accounting, Auditing and Financial Reporting

1. The City's accounting and financial reporting systems will be maintained in conformance with generally accepted accounting principles and standards of the Governmental Accounting Standards Board.

2. A fixed assets system will be maintained to identify all City assets, their historical cost, and useful life.

3. At the beginning of the annual budget preparation cycle, a financial review will be submitted to the City Council and will be made available to the public.

4. Full and continuing disclosure will be provided in the general financial statements and bond representations. 81 Proposed Budget 2022-23

5. An annual audit will be performed by an independent public accounting firm with the subsequent issue of, at a minimum, General Purpose Financial Statements that include an audit opinion. The City will strive to issue audited financial statements within 180 days after year-end.

L. Human Resources Management

1. The City Council will authorize all regular positions, including part-time and extra-help regular positions.

2. The budget will fully appropriate the resources needed for authorized regular positions and will limit programs to the regular staffing authorized.

3. The City will strive to provide competitive compensation and benefits for its authorized regular employees.

4. All requests for additional regular positions will include evaluations of:
a. The necessity, benefits, term and expected results of the proposed activity. b. Staffing and materials costs including salary, benefits, equipment, uniforms, support and facilities. c. Alternative means of service delivery, with consideration given to quality of service. d. Additional revenues or cost savings that may be realized.

City of Angels Camp – Water and Wastewater Rate Study 2019 Page 17 Table 9
City of Angels Camp
UWPA Charge Meter Cost Allocation
Water Year 1 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24
Utica Water And Power Contribution $250,000 $257,500 $265,225 $273,182 $281,377 Growth % 0.0% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5%
Projected 5/8" Meter Equivalents 2,678 2,691 2,704 2,718 2,731 Meter Size 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24
5/8" $7.78 $7.97 $8.17 $8.38 $8.58
3/4" $11.67 $11.96 $12.26 $12.56 $12.88
1" $19.45 $19.94 $20.43 $20.94 $21.46
1 1/2" $38.90 $39.87 $40.86 $41.88 $42.92
2" $62.25 $63.80 $65.38 $67.01 $68.68
3" $116.71 $119.62 $122.59 $125.64 $128.77
4" $194.52 $199.36 $204.32 $209.40 $214.61
6" $389.04 $398.72 $408.64 $418.81 $429.22
Water Year 2 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24
Utica Water And Power Contribution $328,133 $337,976 $348,116 $358,559 $369,316 Meter Size 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24
5/8" $10.21 $10.47 $10.73 $10.99 $11.27
3/4" $15.32 $15.70 $16.09 $16.49 $16.90
1" $25.53 $26.17 $26.82 $27.48 $28.17
1 1/2" $51.06 $52.33 $53.64 $54.97 $56.34
2" $81.70 $83.73 $85.82 $87.95 $90.14
3" $153.19 $157.00 $160.91 $164.91 $169.01
4" $255.32 $261.67 $268.18 $274.85 $281.68
6" $510.63 $523.33 $536.35 $549.70 $563.37
Water Year 3 (Average) 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Utica Water And Power Contribution $405,068 $417,220 $429,737 $442,629 $455,908 Meter Size 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24
5/8" $12.61 $12.92 $13.24 $13.57 $13.91
3/4" $18.91 $19.38 $19.86 $20.36 $20.86
1" $31.52 $32.30 $33.11 $33.93 $34.77
1 1/2" $63.04 $64.60 $66.21 $67.86 $69.55
2" $100.86 $103.37 $105.94 $108.57 $111.27
3" $189.11 $193.81 $198.63 $203.57 $208.64
4" $315.18 $323.02 $331.05 $339.29 $347.73
6" $630.36 $646.04 $662.11 $678.58 $695.46
Attachment A

City of Angels Camp – Water and Wastewater Rate Study 2019 Page 18 Water Year 4 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24
Utica Water And Power Contribution $517,854 $533,390 $549,391 $565,873 $582,849 Meter Size 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24
5/8" $16.12 $16.52 $16.93 $17.35 $17.78
3/4" $24.18 $24.78 $25.39 $26.03 $26.67
1" $40.29 $41.30 $42.32 $43.38 $44.46
1 1/2" $80.59 $82.59 $84.65 $86.75 $88.91
2" $128.94 $132.15 $135.43 $138.80 $142.26
3" $241.76 $247.78 $253.94 $260.26 $266.73
4" $402.94 $412.96 $423.23 $433.76 $444.55
6" $805.87 $825.92 $846.46 $867.52 $889.10
Water Year 5 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24
Utica Water And Power Contribution $589,910 $607,607 $625,836 $644,611 $663,949 Meter Size 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24
5/8" $18.36 $18.82 $19.28 $19.76 $20.26
3/4" $27.54 $28.23 $28.93 $29.65 $30.38
1" $45.90 $47.04 $48.21 $49.41 $50.64
1 1/2" $91.80 $94.08 $96.42 $98.82 $101.28
2" $146.88 $150.53 $154.28 $158.12 $162.05
3" $275.40 $282.25 $289.27 $296.47 $303.84
4" $459.00 $470.42 $482.12 $494.12 $506.41
6" $918.00 $940.84 $964.24 $988.23 $1,012.81
Water Year 6 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24
Utica Water And Power Contribution $635,234 $654,291 $673,920 $694,137 $714,961 Meter Size 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24
5/8" $19.77 $20.26 $20.77 $21.28 $21.81
3/4" $29.66 $30.39 $31.15 $31.92 $32.72
1" $49.43 $50.66 $51.92 $53.21 $54.53
1 1/2" $98.85 $101.31 $103.83 $106.42 $109.06
2" $158.17 $162.10 $166.13 $170.27 $174.50
3" $296.56 $303.94 $311.50 $319.25 $327.19
4" $494.27 $506.56 $519.16 $532.08 $545.32
6" $988.54 $1,013.13 $1,038.33 $1,064.16 $1,090.63
Angels Camp
Capital Improvement Program
2020 - 2025
Introduction
There have been many efforts over the last ten years to develop a vision for the City and identify capital improvement projects to realize that vision. A Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a tool to continue the City’s dialogue with its citizens and to develop priorities and funding needed to pursue this shared vision.

The CIP is a planning document that prioritizes projects by providing a scope, schedule, cost estimate, and funding options for each capital improvement project. This initial 5-year CIP synthesizes the prior efforts into four programs: Public Facilities, Transportation, Wastewater and Water. Additionally, this CIP will consider emergencies, maintenance and federal mandates. Key criteria for prioritization should include: health and safety, project costs and funding, community support, consistency with the General Plan and ongoing maintenance costs.

This initial effort has combined existing projects and proposed projects based on various planning documents to develop a project list for each program. Existing projects are based on last year’s “City Wide Capital Projects” as provided in the Fiscal Year 2019/2020 Budget and prior funded grant projects.

The proposed project scopes and estimates are from newly approved grants and existing planning documents. With future annual updates of the City’s budget, the CIP project scopes, costs, schedules and revenue estimates will be reviewed and updated.

The CIP is constrained by limited available funding sources. Funding types typically used for capital projects include the general fund, special revenue, grant funds, and enterprise funds. The general fund is the most flexible fund; it can be used for a variety of purposes and can be reallocated. Special revenue funds are restricted to certain activities, such as gas tax which must be used on streets but can be moved between street/transportation projects. Grant funds are typically very specific to an activity and/or project. Enterprise funds, like water and wastewater service fees, may only be used for services paid for by that service fee or billing.

Completed Projects
Last year’s “Fiscal Year 2019/2020 Budget City Wide Capital Projects”, included projects that were major efforts and/or one-time expenses. The following items were completed:
1) Citygate Implementation 1 & 2 (General Fund)
2) Permit Software Upgrade (General Fund)
3) Cal Net Phone/Internet Upgrade (General Fund, Wastewater O&M) 4) Repair 1973 Dump Truck & 1986 Backhoe (Gas Tax Roads, Wastewater O&M, Water O&M) 5) Purchase Vibraplate and Whacker (Gas Tax)
6) New Vehicle (Gas Tax, Wastewater Capital Fund, Water Capital Fund) 7) Rate Study (Wastewater Capital Funds and Water Capital Funds) DRAFT Page 1 of 78
Other items listed below are now recommended as annual maintenance items and should be included in the appropriate operating budgets:
8) Hydroflush (Wastewater O&M)
9) Replace Manhole Covers (Wastewater O&M)
10) Hydrant Replacements (Water O&M)
11) Wharf Hydrants (Water O&M)
Programs
As stated above, the CIP is divided into four programs based on type of facility (and associated revenue sources): Public Facilities, Transportation, Wastewater and Water. Each program is described below.

Public Facilities
The City owns and maintains six (6) public buildings, three (3) parks and the Altaville School site. Roof, HVAC and carpeting typically need replacement every 20, 15 and 10 years, respectively. The City facilities need to be assessed for long-term maintenance needs. Energy audits of the buildings are also recommended to be included to update facilities while reducing operating expenses.

In 2009, the City completed a self-evaluation of physical accessibility improvements of public facilities that were needed to comply with the civil rights act. The City is not legally required to adopt an official Transition Plan since it would result in an undue financial and administrative burden. However, while a fully developed and funded program is not required, providing incremental accessibility improvements as the budget allows shows effort to address the needs of and include the disabled community.

Facilities were prioritized as follows:

1. Fire Station/Council Chambers, CDD, Police Station

2. City Hall, Visitor’s Center, Museum, Utica Park

3. All parking lots, Altaville School, Gateway Park, Tyron Park Improvements, or barrier removal, were prioritized in the report as follows:

1. Access to main entrance or path of travel to facility

2. Access to program use areas (e.g. transition counters, conference rooms, public offices, tennis courts, restrooms, etc.)

3. Access to amenities serving program areas (e.g. drinking fountains, telephones, furnishings, vending machines)

4. Access to areas or features not required to be accessible (no public programs provided in area, or programs and service can be provided in other locations).

DRAFT Page 2 of 78
Parks, Police and Fire all have development impact fees to mitigate the impact of development on existing programs and facilities. At this time, all impact fee funds are directed to land acquisition for parks and equipment needs for police and fire, not projects.

Projects included in the Landscaping and Lighting District #1 Annual Engineer’s Report should also be considered for inclusion in next year’s CIP.

Revenue sources for the Facilities program typically include the general fund and special revenues funds (impact fees, LLD assessment).

Transportation
The Transportation Program is comprised of active and proposed CIP projects from a variety of sources.

First, the City is actively working on several federal and state grant funded CIP projects awarded by the Calaveras Council of Governments and Caltrans which promote walking and bicycling in the City, increase safety and improved air quality.

Additionally, Calaveras Council of Government commissioned the “Angels Camp Pavement Management Implementation Final Report” by NCE dated December 2019. The City currently maintains 31.2 centerline miles of public streets. The pavement condition was assessed using the pavement condition index (PCI) which ranges from 0 to 100. A newly constructed street has a PCI of 100; a failing street has a PCI of 25 or less. Currently, the City’s street network has an average pavement condition index of 70, which means that the City’s streets are in “good” condition (71 or “good” for residential streets and 68 or “fair” for collector streets). However, using only SB-1 projected funds of approximately $68,000 per year, the overall system PCI is expected to drop to 53 or “fair” (58 or “fair” for residential streets and 36 or “poor” for collector streets) over the next 10 years and deferred maintenance increases $9.4M by 2029. NCE recommended increasing funding for pavement maintenance to $5.5 million over the next 10 years which would provide a minimum PCI of 70 for all collectors and an average PCI of 70 for residential streets, and result in $2.6M of deferred maintenance in 2029. Pavement maintenance funds are assumed to remain at existing funding levels in this year’s CIP.

The 2020 General Plan and subsequent Impact Fee Study Report for Streets and Traffic Signals Final Draft dated May 30, 2016 prepared by Colgan Consulting Corporation provides the list of projects, planning level cost estimates and Traffic Impact Fees needed to support future growth as defined in the adopted 2020 General Plan.

The Citygate Report concluded that the City expenses were appropriate for the City, but that revenues were not keeping pace with the expenses. To continue to grow the City’s revenue, the City set Strategic Goal #3 as Local Control and Economic Development. Recommendation No. 2: Broaden City’s Economic Development Program includes a) Adoption of a 5-year Economic Development Infrastructure Program and b) allocation of at least 10% of the City’s Annual Unassigned General Fund Revenue Towards Infrastructure Projects to Advance Economic Development Goals. In 2016, the “Angels Camp SR 4 and SR 49 Gateway and Corridor Study” identified the northwest quadrant of the SR 4 /SR 49 was best-suited for new development and determined that the Foundry Lane Extension Project was the preferred option to support economic development in the City. To continue those efforts, the Foundry Lane Extension DRAFT Page 3 of 78
and Angel Oaks Extension Projects are partially-funded in the CIP to develop more detailed preliminary engineering and to continue coordination with Caltrans.

Further consideration of land use and traffic circulation set another priority for the south quadrant of SR 4/SR 49 intersection to connect and strengthen the downtown area. Angels Creek Main Street Plan dated May 2017 is a long-range plan for historic downtown Main Street (SR 49). The project area extends from Murphys Grade to Finnegan Lane and Vallecito Road. This document is a planning guide providing ideas and vision for Main Street that will guide future development and Caltrans projects along Main Street but does not provide or prioritize scoped projects. Implementation (Chapter 6) of the Main Street Plan outlines the following steps:

1. Adopt the Main Street Plan

2. Prioritize Implementation Actions

3. Identify and Secure Funding

4. Program Capital Improvements

5. Monitoring and Management
The City has begun implementation of the Main Street Plan and received grant funding for the Murphys Grade Road Project, the SR-49 Sidewalk Gap Fill Project and the Main Street Historic District Improvement Project to provide sidewalks and bike lanes. The first two projects are completing the design phase and are expected to be constructed by the end of this fiscal year. The Main Street Historic District Improvement Project recently received funding for conceptual design and environmental clearance and will begin next year. Funding and implementation of the Main Street Plan warrants further discussion for future years to continue economic development in the City.

Other planning level documents related to transportation and alternate transportation modes include the Angels Creek Trail Master Plan and the Calaveras County Regional Bicycle, Pedestrian and Safe Routes to School Master Plan. The Angels Creek Trail Master Plan dated January 2012 provides a preferred alignment and potential phasing for a 5.1 mile multi-use trail along Angels Creek, from Murphys Grade/SR 4 intersection to New Melones Reservoir, as identified in the 2020 General Plan. The City received grant funding for and is currently developing the initial design and environmental studies for the Angels Creek Trail Phase 1 (Central Reach). The Calaveras County Regional Bicycle, Pedestrian and Safe Routes to School Master Plan dated June 2015 provides and prioritizes bikeway, sidewalk and pedestrian projects. These projects should be reviewed and added to next year’s CIP.

In 2009, the City conducted a self-assessment of improvements to remove barriers in accordance with the civil rights act. The Department of Justice Title II regulations require local government entities to prioritize the installation of curb ramps serving locations as follows:
1) State and local government offices and facilities
2) Transportation facilities
3) Places of accommodation (private -sector facilities covered by Title III) 4) Places of employment
5) Residential areas
DRAFT Page 4 of 78
Although not funded or delivered by the City, the CIP also includes information regarding two Caltrans improvement projects scheduled for project development and delivery during this 5-year period: 1) Angels SR 49/SR 4 and SR 49/Francis Street Intersection Improvements and 2) Angels SR 49 ADA Project.

Revenue sources for the Transportation Program are typically grant funds and special revenue funds (impact fees).

Wastewater
A Wastewater Master Plan was prepared for the City’s wastewater collection, treatment and disposal system to ensure the City has adequate facilities to support future growth as defined in the adopted 2020 General Plan. The Wastewater Master Plan includes identification and prioritization of recommended improvement projects. The improvement projects were prioritized using a simplified business risk exposure model which considers consequences and probability of failure.

In 2019, the Wastewater Master Plan and proposed CIP program were reviewed to assess the current wastewater rates and connection fees. As identified in the Wastewater Master Plan and by the Citygate Report, wastewater service rates needed to be increased to keep up with the needs and operation of the system. Wastewater service rates were increased effective August 21, 2019. This CIP includes the adopted rate increase, proposed 5-year CIP program and also considers potential emergency needs.

Water
A Water Master Plan was prepared for the City’s water supply, treatment, distribution and storage systems to ensure the City has adequate facilities to support future growth as defined in the adopted City of Angels 2020 General Plan. The Water Master Plan includes an evaluation of existing facilities, an assessment of alternate water supplies, and an identification of recommended improvement projects for the water supply treatment, distribution and storage systems. System improvements were recommended and prioritized. Projects for treatment, supply and storage were prioritized based on the following, in order of priority:

1. Addressing regulatory concerns

2. Improving reliability by providing operational redundancy

3. Replacing aging infrastructure

4. Providing capacity for future development
Projects for water distribution were prioritized based on the following, in order of priority:

1. Providing required fire flow for existing demands

2. Meeting hydraulic performance criteria for existing demands

3. Providing required fire flow for future (buildout) demands

4. Meeting hydraulic performance criteria for future (buildout) demands In 2019, the Water Master Plan and proposed CIP program were reviewed to assess the current water service rates and capacity fees. As identified in the Water Master Plan and by the Citygate Report, DRAFT Page 5 of 78
water service rates needed to be increased to keep up with the needs and operation of the system.

Water rates were increased effective August 21, 2019. This CIP includes the adopted rate increase, proposed 5-year CIP program and also considers further operational and potential emergency needs.

DRAFT Page 6 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Public Facilities CIP Projects
Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total General Funds (010) Subtotal: $15,000 $56,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $0 $171,000 Public Facilties CIP Subtotal: $15,000 $56,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $0 $171,000 Transportation CIP Projects
Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Grant Funds Total: $1,902,882 $3,856,814 $586,187 $1,929,743 $5,750,000 $0 $0 $0 $14,025,626 Transportation Funds Total: $100,116 $68,209 $123,000 $123,000 $123,000 $123,000 $123,000 $68,000 $851,325 TIM Fee Total: $210,000 $84,000 $220,350 $608,450 $243,300 $488,300 $0 $14,327,760 $16,182,160 Caltrans Funds Total: $210,000 $0 $2,993,000 $0 $7,965,000 $3,185,000 $15,273,000 $89,293,130 $118,919,130 Private Development Funds Total $0 $336,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,001,100 $11,337,100 Transportation CIP Subtotal: $2,422,998 $4,345,023 $3,922,537 $2,661,193 $14,081,300 $3,796,300 $15,396,000 $114,689,990 $161,315,341 Wastewater CIP Projects
Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Wastewater Rates (300) Subtotal: $670,000 $850,000 $710,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $0 $2,305,000 Wastewater Connection Fee (305)
Subtotal: $224,000 $0 $225,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $449,000
Capital Replacement - Sewer (Loan to
Water) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $165,000 $0 $165,000
Wastewater CIP Subtotal: $894,000 $850,000 $935,000 $25,000 $25,000 $190,000 $0 $2,919,000 Water Projects
Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Water Rates (350) Subtotal: $180,000 $180,000 $340,000 $1,025,000 $1,025,000 $25,000 $1,670,000 $4,445,000 Water Connection Fee (355) Subtotal: $0 $0 $345,000 $555,000 $500,000 $0 $525,000 $1,925,000 Capital Replacement - Water Subtotal: $100,000 $1,335,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,435,000 Water CIP Subtotal: $280,000 $1,515,000 $685,000 $1,580,000 $1,525,000 $25,000 $2,195,000 $7,805,000 CIP TOTAL $2,422,998 $5,534,023 $6,343,537 $4,306,193 $15,711,300 $5,371,300 $15,636,000 $116,884,990 $172,210,341 Overall CIP Program
DRAFT Page 7 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
General Fund (010)
Project Name Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total City Hall Deferred Maintenance - Roof $0 $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000 City Hall Window Replacement $0 $0 $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000 City Hall Carpet Replacement and Painting $0 $0 $16,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,000 Minor Facility Repairs $0 $0 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $0 $125,000 General Funds (010) Subtotal: $15,000 $56,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $0 $171,000 Public Facilities Funds Total: $15,000 $56,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $0 $171,000 General Funds
Project Type: Public Facilities
DRAFT Page 8 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
City Hall Deferred Maintenance - Roof
Project Type: Public Facilities
Project Number:

Project Description: Repair roof at City Hall
Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total General Fund (010) $ 15,000 $ 15,000
$ 15,000
Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant -$
Planning/Env - Staff -$
Design - Consultant -$
Design - Staff $ 1,000 $ 1,000
Direct Right of Way Costs -$
Right of Way Staff -$
Direct Construction Costs $ 14,000 $ 14,000
Construction Staff -$
$ 15,000
Project Schedule Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
DRAFT Page 9 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
City Hall Window Replacement
Project Type: Public Facilities
Project Number: PF2
Project Description: Replace windows at City Hall; deferred in FY19/20 Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total General Fund 15,000$ $ 15,000
$ 15,000
Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant -$
Planning/Env - Staff -$
Design - Consultant -$
Design - Staff 1,000$ $ 1,000
Direct Right of Way Costs -$
Right of Way Staff -$
Direct Construction Costs 14,000$ $ 14,000
Construction Staff -$
$ 15,000
Project Schedule Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
DRAFT Page 10 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
City Hall Carpet Replacement and Painting
Project Type: Public Facilities
Project Number: PF3
Project Description: Replace flooring, repair and paint walls at City Hall; deferred in FY19/20 Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total General Fund 16,000$ $ 16,000
$ 16,000
Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant -$
Planning/Env - Staff -$
Design - Consultant -$
Design - Staff 1,000$ $ 1,000
Direct Right of Way Costs -$
Right of Way Staff -$
Direct Construction Costs 15,000$ $ 15,000
Construction Staff -$
$ 16,000
Project Schedule Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
DRAFT Page 11 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Minor Facility Repairs
Project Type: Public Facilities
Project Number: PF4
Project Description:

Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total General Fund $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000
Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant $ -
Planning/Env - Staff $ -
Design - Consultant $ 20,000 $ 20,000
Design - Staff $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 25,000 Direct Right of Way Costs $ -
Right of Way Staff $ -
Direct Construction Costs $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 60,000 Construction Staff $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 20,000 $ 125,000
Project Schedule Prior FY FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
Minor or emergency repairs to public buildings, parks and parking lots, including ADA upgrades. First year is assessment of long-term maintenance needs.

DRAFT Page 12 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Federal Grants:

Project Name Grant Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Murphys Grade Road Sidewalk and Infill Project Federal Grant - CMAQ $ 321,000 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $ 321,000 Murphys Grade Road Sidewalk and Infill Project Federal Grant - HIP -$ 58,814$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $ 58,814 Murphys Grade Road Sidewalk and Infill Project Federal Grant - RSTP -$ 1,158,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,158,000 $ SR-49 Sidewalk and Bike Lane Project Federal Grant - CMAQ $ 411,869 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $ 411,869 Angels Camp Trail Project - Segment 1 Federal Grant - CMAQ $ 707,013 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $ 707,013 Angels Electric Vehicle Charger Federal Grant - CMAQ $ 7,000 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $ 7,000 City-Wide Roadway Safety Sign Audit Federal Grant - HSIP -$ 40,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $ 40,800 Main Street Historic District Improvement
Project Federal Grant - HIP -$ 226,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $ 226,000 $ 1,446,882 1,483,614$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,930,496 $
State Grants:

Project Name Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total SR-49 Sidewalk and Bike Lane Project State Grant - ATP $ 165,000 1,820,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $ 1,985,000 City-Wide Collector Road Striping State Grant - RSTP $ 80,000 75,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $ 155,200 $ 245,000 1,895,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,140,200 $
Programmed Grants:

Project Name Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Murphys Grade Road Sidewalk and Infill Project Programmed State Grant - RSTP $ 211,000 -$ 210,000$ 124,743$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $ 545,743 Murphys Grade Road Sidewalk and Infill Project Reprogrammed Federal Grant - CMAQ -$ 63,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $ 63,000 Murphys Grade Road Sidewalk and Infill Project Reallocated Federal Grant - CMAQ -$ 415,000$ 253,687$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $ 668,687 Angels Camp Trail Project - Segment 1 Programmed Federal Grant - CMAQ $ - $ 415,000 $ 253,687 $ 415,000 $ 415,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,498,687 Angels Camp Trail Project - Segment 1 Reprogrammed Federal Grant - CMAQ $ - $ (415,000) $ (253,687) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ (668,687) City-Wide Roadway Safety Sign Audit Programmed Federal Grant - HSIP -$ -$ 122,500$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $ 122,500 Angels Electric Vehicle Charger Programmed Federal Grant - CMAQ -$ 63,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $ 63,000 Angels Electric Vehicle Charger Reprogram Federal Grant - CMAQ -$ (63,000) $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $ (63,000) $ 211,000 478,000$ 586,187$ 539,743$ 415,000$ -$ -$ -$ 2,229,930 $ Anticipated Grants:

Project Name Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Angels Camp Trail Project - Segment 1 TBD Grant -$ -$ -$ 325,000$ 5,335,000$ -$ -$ -$ 5,660,000 $ Main Street Historic District Improvement ProjectTBD Grant -$ -$ -$ 1,065,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,065,000 $ -$ -$ -$ 1,390,000$ 5,335,000$ -$ -$ -$ 6,725,000 $
$ 1,902,882 $ 3,856,814 $ 586,187 $ 1,929,743 $ 5,750,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 14,025,626 Transportation CIP Total $2,422,998 $4,345,023 $3,922,537 $2,661,193 $14,081,300 $3,796,300 $15,396,000 $114,689,990 $161,315,341 Project Type: Transportation
Grant Funds
Grant Funds Total:

Anticipated Grants Subtotal:

State Grants Subtotal:

Federal Grants Subtotal:

Programmed Grants Subtotal:

DRAFT Page 13 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Gas Tax:

Project Name Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Minor Roadway Repairs 0 $0 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $0 $ 150,000 ADA Improvements $0 $0 $24,000 $24,000 $24,000 $24,000 $24,000 $0 $ 120,000 Gas Tax Subtotal: $0 $0 $54,000 $54,000 $54,000 $54,000 $54,000 $0 $270,000 Project Name Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total ADA Improvements 0 $0 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $0 $ 5,000 CSJVRMA SLMP Subtotal: $0 $0 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $0 $5,000 RMRA:

Project Name Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Biennial Pavement Rehabilitation 2020 $100,116 $68,209 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $168,325 Biennial Pavement Rehabilitation 2022 $0 $0 $68,000 $68,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $136,000 Biennial Pavement Rehabilitation 2024 $0 $0 $0 $0 $68,000 $68,000 $0 $0 $136,000 Biennial Pavement Rehabilitation 2026 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $68,000 $68,000 $136,000 RMRA Subtotal: $100,116 $68,209 $68,000 $68,000 $68,000 $68,000 $68,000 $68,000 $576,325 Transportation Funds Total: $100,116 $68,209 $123,000 $123,000 $123,000 $123,000 $123,000 $68,000 $851,325 Transportation CIP Total: $2,422,998 $4,345,023 $3,922,537 $2,661,193 $14,081,300 $3,796,300 $15,396,000 $114,689,990 $161,315,341 Transportation Funds
Project Type: Transportation
CSJVRMA Sidewalk Liability Mitigation Program:

DRAFT Page 14 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Project Name Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Angel Oaks Dr Extension $ - $ - $ - $ 488,300 $ - $ 488,300 $ - $ 976,600 Foundry Lane Extension $ - $ - $ 180,300 $ - $ 180,300 $ - $ - $ 360,600 Kurt Dr Extension $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,076,500 $ 2,076,500 Purdy Dr Extension $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 724,500 $ 724,500 Purdy Dr Extension Widening $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 547,680 $ 547,680 Gold Cliff Rd Extension $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,916,880 $ 1,916,880 Sierra Avenue Connection $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 638,960 $ 638,960 Demarest St Extension $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 638,960 $ 638,960 Stockton Rd Widening $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,802,780 $ 1,802,780 SR 49 Widening $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Vallecito Rd/SR-4 Bypass Right Turn $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - SR-49 Bypass (Alt 3B) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
SR-49 Bridge Replacement $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Road A $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,600,000 $ 1,600,000
Traffic Signal #1 at SR-49 North and Copello Drive $ - $ - $ 40,050 $ 120,150 $ - $ - $ - $ 160,200 Traffic Signal #2 at SR-49 North & Stanislaus Avenue $ - $ 84,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 84,000 Traffic Signal #3 at SR-49 North and Angel Oaks Drive $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 400,500 $ 400,500 Traffic Signal #4 at SR-49 North and Bret Harte Road $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 63,000 $ - $ 147,000 $ 210,000 Traffic Signal #5 at SR-49 North and Angel Oaks Extension $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 801,000 $ 801,000 Traffic Signal #6 at Angel Oaks Dr Extension and Foundry Lane Extension -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $ - $ 420,000 $ 420,000
Traffic Signal #7 at Kurt Drive Extension and Murphys Grade Road -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $ - $ 1,773,000 $ 1,773,000
Traffic Signal #8 at SR 49 Bypass and SR 49 North $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 420,000 $ 420,000 Traffic Signal #9 at SR 49 Bypass and SR 4 West $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 420,000 $ 420,000 Traffic Signal #11 at SR 49 & Murphys Grade Road $ 210,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 210,000 Grant Funds Total:

TIM Fee Total: $ 210,000 $ 84,000 $ 220,350 $ 608,450 $ 243,300 $ 488,300 $ - $ 14,327,760 $ 16,182,160 Transportation CIP Total $2,422,998 $4,345,023 $3,922,537 $2,661,193 $14,081,300 $3,796,300 $15,396,000 $114,689,990 $161,315,341 TIM Fee Funds
Project Type: Transportation
DRAFT Page 15 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Project Name Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Caltrans Angels SR 49 ADA Project -$ -$ 1,360,000$ -$ 4,521,000$ -$ 4,295,000 $ -$ 10,176,000 $ Caltrans Angels SR 49/SR-4 and SR49/Francis Street Intersection Improvements
-$ -$ 1,633,000$ -$ 3,444,000$ 3,185,000$ $ 10,978,000 $ 19,240,000 SR 49 Widening -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $ 2,955,190 $ 2,955,190 Vallecito Rd/SR-4 Bypass Right Turn -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $ 753,060 $ 753,060 SR-49 Bypass (Alt 3B) -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $ 72,196,050 $ 72,196,050 SR-49 Bridge Replacement -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $ 12,128,830 $ 12,128,830 Traffic Signal #10 at SR 49 & SR 4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $ 420,000 $ 420,000 Traffic Signal #11 at SR 49 & Murphys Grade Road210,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $ 210,000 Traffic Signal #12 at SR 49 Bypass and SR49 South -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $ 420,000 $ 420,000 Traffic Signal #13 at SR 49 and Vallecito Road -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $ 420,000 $ 420,000 Caltrans Funds Total: $ 210,000 $ - $ 2,993,000 $ - $ 7,965,000 $ 3,185,000 $ 15,273,000 $ 89,293,130 $ 118,919,130 Transportation CIP Total $2,422,998 $4,345,023 $3,922,537 $2,661,193 $14,081,300 $3,796,300 $15,396,000 $114,689,990 $161,315,341 Caltrans Funds
Project Type: Transportation
DRAFT Page 16 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Project Name Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Angel Oaks Dr Extension -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $ 3,906,400 $ 3,906,400 Foundry Lane Extension -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $ 1,442,400 $ 1,442,400 Kurt Dr Extension -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $ 2,076,500 $ 2,076,500 Purdy Dr Extension -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $ 724,500 $ 724,500 Road A -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $ 1,600,000 $ 1,600,000
Traffic Signal #1 at SR-49 North and Copello Drive$ - -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $ 640,800 $ 640,800 Traffic Signal #2 at SR-49 North & Stanislaus Avenue$ 336,000 - $ -$ -$ -$ -$ $ - $ 336,000 Traffic Signal #3 at SR-49 North and Angel Oaks Drive $ - -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $ 400,500 $ 400,500 Traffic Signal #4 at SR-49 North and Bret Harte Road$ - -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $ 210,000 $ 210,000 Private Development Funds Total $ - $ 336,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 11,001,100 $ 11,337,100 Transportation CIP Total $2,422,998 $4,345,023 $3,922,537 $2,661,193 $14,081,300 $3,796,300 $15,396,000 $114,689,990 $161,315,341 Private Development Funds
Project Type: Transportation
DRAFT Page 17 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Project Number: 52012
Project Description:

Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Federal Grant - CMAQ $321,000 $321,000
Programmed State Grant - RSTP $211,000 $210,000 $124,743 $545,743 Federal Grant - HIP $58,814 $58,814
Federal Grant - RSTP $1,158,000 $1,158,000
Reprogrammed Federal Grant - CMAQ $63,000 $63,000
Reallocated Federal Grant - CMAQ $415,000 $253,687 $668,687 $2,815,244
Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant 197,357$ $197,357
Planning/Env - Staff 43,478$ $43,478
Design - Consultant $0
Design - Staff $ 12,500 $12,500
Direct Right of Way Costs -$ $0
Right of Way Staff $0
Direct Construction Costs $ 2,206,000 $2,206,000
Construction Staff $ 375,000 $375,000
$2,834,335
Project Schedule Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
Murphys Grade Road adjacent to the Jumping Frog Motel.

Murphys Grade Road Sidewalk and Infill Project
Project Type: Roadway
Construct sidewalk and bike lanes on Murphys Grade Road from Demarest Street to Gardner Lane. Project construction is underfunded. Staff is working with Calaveras Council of Governments to reprogram funds from Angels Electric Vehicle Charging Station Project and the Angels Camp Trail Project - Segment 1. The CIP assumes the funds are reallocated.

DRAFT Page 18 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Project Number: 52147
Project Description:

Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total Federal Grant - CMAQ $ 411,869 $ 411,869
State Grant - ATP $ 165,000 $ 1,820,000 $ 1,985,000
$ 2,396,869
Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant $ 150,000 $ 150,000
Planning/Env - Staff $ -
Design - Consultant $ 210,000 $ 210,000
Design - Staff $ -
Direct Right of Way Costs $ 165,000 $ 165,000
Right of Way- Consultant $ 9,869 $ 42,000 $ 51,869
Direct Construction Costs $ 1,235,000 $ 1,235,000
Construction Staff $ 235,000 $ 235,000
Other $ 350,000 $ 350,000
$ 2,396,869
Project Schedule Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
SR-49 Sidewalk and Bike Lane Project
Project Type: Roadway
Construct sidewalk and bike lanes on SR-49 northbound between Bragg Street and Stanislaus Avenue and SR49 southbound between SR-4 and Stockton Road (identified need in Calaveras County Bicycle, Pedestrian and Safe Route to School Master Plan).

View along Main Street/SR-49 facing north towards the
intersection of SR-4.

DRAFT Page 19 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Project Number:

Project Description:

Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Federal Grant - CMAQ $ 707,013 707,013$
Programmed Federal Grant - CMAQ $ 415,000 $ 253,687 $ 415,000 $ 415,000 1,498,687$ Reprogrammed Federal Grant - CMAQ ($415,000) ($253,687) ($668,687) TBD Grant $ 325,000 $ 5,335,000 5,660,000$
7,197,013$
Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant $ 175,000 175,000$
Planning/Env - Staff $ 9,500 9,500$
Design - Consultant $ 510,790 $ 490,000 1,000,790$
Design - Staff $ 11,723 11,723$
Direct Right of Way Costs $ 200,000 200,000$
Right of Way -Consultant $ 50,000 50,000$
Direct Construction Costs $ 5,000,000 5,000,000$
Construction Mgmt - Consultant $ 750,000 750,000$
7,197,013$
Project Schedule Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
Angels Camp Trail Project - Segment 1
Project Type: Roadway
Construct approximately 1.5 miles of Class I trail south of historic downtown adjacent to Angels Creek; project includes a prefabricated bridge and Park & Ride facility.

Finnigan Lane adjacent to Angels Creek along a
proposed segment of the trail.

DRAFT Page 20 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Project Number: 52066
Project Description:

Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total State Grant - RSTP 80,000$ $ 75,200 $ 155,200
$ 155,200
Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant -$
Planning/Env - Staff -$
Design - Consultant $ 13,000 $ 13,000
Design - Staff -$
Direct Right of Way Costs -$
Right of Way Staff -$
Direct Construction Costs $ 129,700 $ 129,700
Construction Staff $ 12,500 $ 12,500
$ 155,200
Project Schedule Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
The project will restripe local collector roads city-wide, including Angel Oaks Drive, Booster Way, Bret Harte Road, Demarest Street, Dogtown Road, Finnegan Lane, Gold Cliff Road, Greenhorn Creek Road, Kurt Drive, Mark Twain Road, Murphy's Grade Road, Stanislaus Avenue, and Stockton Road.

Project Type: Roadway
City-Wide Collector Road Striping
DRAFT Page 21 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Project Number: 52135
Project Description:

Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total Federal Grant - HSIP $ 40,800 40,800$
Programmed Federal Grant - HSIP $ 122,500 122,500$
163,300$
Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant $ 30,000 30,000$
Planning/Env - Staff -$
Design - Consultant $ 10,800 10,800$
Design - Staff -$
Direct Right of Way Costs -$
Right of Way Staff -$
Direct Construction Costs $ 101,300 101,300$
Construction Staff $ 21,200 21,200$
163,300$
Project Schedule Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
The project will conduct a Roadway Safety Sign Audit (RSSA) and install, relocate and/or remove roadway signs based on the result of the RSSA.

Project Type: Roadway
City-Wide Roadway Safety Sign Audit
DRAFT Page 22 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Project Number: 52099
Project Description:

Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Federal Grant - CMAQ 7,000$ 7,000$
Programmed Federal Grant - CMAQ 63,000$ 63,000$
Reprogram Federal Grant - CMAQ $ (63,000) $ (63,000)
7,000$
Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant 5,000$ 5,000$
Planning/Env - Staff -$
Design - Consultant 2,000$ 2,000$
Design - Staff -$
Direct Right of Way Costs -$
Right of Way Staff -$
Direct Construction Costs -$
Construction Staff -$
Other -$
7,000$
Project Schedule Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
The Electric Vehicle Charger Project completed preliminary engineering for the installation of two level 2 charging stations in the Visitor Center Parking (VCP) lot. It was determined that the project is not consistent with the historic commercial zoning. Staff is working wtih Caltrans to obtain approval to cancel the construction phase. Staff is also working with Calaveras Council of Governments to reprogram the construction funds to Murphys Grade Road Infill and Sidewalk Project.

Project Type: Roadway
Angels Electric Vehicle Charger
DRAFT Page 23 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Project Number:

Project Description:

Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Federal Grant - HIP $ 226,000 226,000$
TBD Grant $ 1,065,000 1,065,000$
1,291,000$
Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant $ 90,000 90,000$
Planning/Env - Staff -$
Design - Consultant $ 136,000 136,000$
Design - Staff
Direct Right of Way Costs $25,000 25,000$
Right of Way Staff
Direct Construction Costs $ 870,000 870,000$
Construction Staff $ 170,000 170,000$
1,291,000$
Project Schedule Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
Main Street at Utica Park.

Construct sidewalk and bike lanes and improve ADA access between Bragg Street and Rasberry Lane in historic downtown.

Project Type: Roadway
Main Street Historic District Improvement Project
DRAFT Page 24 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Project Number: Caltrans EA 1H700K
Project Description: Sidewalk, Curb Ramps and Driveways along SR-49, from Pine Street to Brunner Hill Road.

Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Caltrans SHOPP $ 1,360,000 4,521,000$ $ 4,295,000 $ 10,176,000 $ 10,176,000
Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant
Planning/Env - Staff $ 1,360,000 $ 1,360,000
Design - Consultant
Design - Staff 1,454,000$ $ 1,454,000
Direct Right of Way Costs 359,000$ $ 359,000
Right of Way Staff 2,708,000$ $ 2,708,000
Direct Construction Costs $ 3,106,000 $ 3,106,000
Construction Staff $ 1,189,000 $ 1,189,000
$ 10,176,000
Project Schedule Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
Project Type: Roadway
Caltrans Angels SR 49 ADA Project
DRAFT Page 25 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Project Number:

Project Description:

Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Caltrans SHOPP $ 1,633,000 $ 3,444,000 $ 3,185,000 $ 10,978,000 $ 19,240,000 Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant
Planning/Env - Staff $ 1,633,000 $ 1,633,000
Design - Consultant
Design - Staff $ 2,010,000 $ 2,010,000
Direct Right of Way Costs $ 3,185,000 $ 3,185,000
Right of Way Staff $ 1,434,000 $ 1,434,000
Direct Construction Costs $ 9,470,000 $ 9,470,000
Construction Staff $ 1,508,000 $ 1,508,000
$ 19,240,000
Project Schedule Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
Construct two roundabouts at 1) SR-4/SR-49 and 2) SR-49/Francis Street.

Project Type: Roadway
Caltrans Angels SR 49/SR-4 and SR-49/Francis Street Intersection Improvements DRAFT Page 26 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Project Number: 52146
Project Description: Rehabilitate pavement on Acorn Street and Gardner Lane from Murphys Grade Road to Easy Street.

Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total RMRA $ 100,116 $ 68,209 $ 168,325
$ 168,325
Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant $ -
Planning/Env - Staff $ -
Design - Consultant $ 15,000 $ 15,000
Design - Staff $ -
Direct Right of Way Costs $ -
Right of Way Staff $ -
Direct Construction Costs $ 128,325 $ 128,325
Construction Staff $ 25,000 $ 25,000
$ 168,325
Project Schedule Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
Distressed pavement on Gardner Street.

Project Type: Roadway
Biennial Pavement Rehabilitation 2020
DRAFT Page 27 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Project Number:

Project Description: Rehabilitate pavement.

Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total RMRA 68,000$ 68,000$ 136,000$
Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant -$
Planning/Env - Staff -$
Design - Consultant 15,000$ 15,000$
Design - Staff -$
Direct Right of Way Costs -$
Right of Way Staff -$
Direct Construction Costs 96,000$ 96,000$
Construction Staff 25,000$ 25,000$
136,000$
Project Schedule Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
Project Type: Roadway
Biennial Pavement Rehabilitation 2022
DRAFT Page 28 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Project Number:

Project Description: Rehabilitate pavement.

Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total RMRA 68,000$ 68,000$ 136,000$
Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant -$
Planning/Env - Staff -$
Design - Consultant 15,000$ 15,000$
Design - Staff -$
Direct Right of Way Costs -$
Right of Way Staff -$
Direct Construction Costs 96,000$ 96,000$
Construction Staff 25,000$ 25,000$
136,000$
Project Schedule Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
Project Type: Roadway
Biennial Pavement Rehabilitation 2026
DRAFT Page 29 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Project Number:

Project Description: Rehabilitate pavement.

Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total RMRA 68,000$ 68,000$ 136,000$
Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant -$
Planning/Env - Staff -$
Design - Consultant 15,000$ 15,000$
Design - Staff -$
Direct Right of Way Costs -$
Right of Way Staff -$
Direct Construction Costs 96,000$ 96,000$
Construction Staff 25,000$ 25,000$
136,000$
Project Schedule Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
Project Type: Roadway
Biennial Pavement Rehabilitation 2024
DRAFT Page 30 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Project Number:

Project Description:

Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Gas Tax 30,000$ 30,000$ 30,000$ 30,000$ 30,000$ $ 150,000 Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant
Planning/Env - Staff
Design - Consultant
Design - Staff 5,000$ 5,000$ 5,000$ 5,000$ 5,000$ $ 25,000 Direct Right of Way Costs
Right of Way Staff
Direct Construction Costs 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ $ 100,000 Construction Staff 5,000$ 5,000$ 5,000$ 5,000$ 5,000$ $ 25,000 $ 150,000
Project Schedule Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
Construct minor and/or emergency repairs to roadways, culvert, sidewalks and other roadway related items.

Project Type: Roadway
Minor Roadway Repairs
DRAFT Page 31 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Project Number:

Project Description: Construct sidewalk, curb ramps and remove barriers to promote ADA accessibility.

Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Anticipated Grant - CDBG -$
Gas Tax $ 24,000 24,000$ 24,000$ 24,000$ $ 24,000 $ 120,000 CSJVRMA Sidewalk Liability
Mitigation Program $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $ 5,000 $ 125,000
Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant -$
Planning/Env - Staff -$
Design - Consultant -$
Design - Staff $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $ 15,000 Direct Right of Way Costs -$
Right of Way Staff -$
Direct Construction Costs $ 19,000 19,000$ 19,000$ 19,000$ $ 19,000 $ 95,000 Construction Staff $ 3,000 3,000$ 3,000$ 3,000$ $ 3,000 $ 15,000 $ 125,000
Project Schedule Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
Curb ramp.

ADA Improvements
Project Type: Roadway
DRAFT Page 32 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Project Number:

Project Description: Construct 0.81 miles of new 2-lane road from SR-49 to SR-4 West Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total TIM Fee 488,300$ 488,300$ $ 976,600
Private Development $ 3,906,400 $ 3,906,400
$ 4,883,000
Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant 488,300$ $ 488,300
Planning/Env - Staff -$
Design - Consultant 488,300$ $ 244,150 $ 732,450
Design - Staff -$
Direct Right of Way Costs -$
Right of Way Staff -$
Direct Construction Costs $ 2,929,800 $ 2,929,800
Construction Staff $ 732,450 $ 732,450
$ 4,883,000
Project Schedule Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
Project Type: Roadway
Angel Oaks Dr Extension
DRAFT Page 33 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Project Number: 50081
Project Description: Construct new 0.30 miles of 2-lane road from SR-4 West to Angel Oaks Dr Extension.

Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total General Fund, Long Range
Planning Fees & Roads 40,000$
Wastewater 10,000$
Water 10,000$
TIM Fee 180,300$ $ 180,300 $ 360,600
Private Development 1,442,400$ $ 1,442,400
$ 1,803,000
Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant 60,000$ $180,300 $ 240,300
Planning/Env - Staff -$
Design - Consultant $ 180,300 90,150$ $ 270,450
Design - Staff -$
Direct Right of Way Costs -$
Right of Way Staff -$
Direct Construction Costs 1,021,800$ $ 1,021,800
Construction Staff 270,450$ $ 270,450
$ 1,803,000
Project Schedule Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
Project Type: Roadway
Foundry Lane Extension
DRAFT Page 34 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Project Number:

Project Description: Construct 0.69 miles of new 2-lane road from Kurt Drive to Murphys Grade Road.

Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total TIM Fee 2,076,500$ $ 2,076,500
Private Development 2,076,500$ $ 2,076,500
$ 4,153,000
Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant 415,300$ $ 415,300
Planning/Env - Staff -$
Design - Consultant 622,950$ $ 622,950
Design - Staff -$
Direct Right of Way Costs -$
Right of Way Staff -$
Direct Construction Costs 2,491,800$ $ 2,491,800
Construction Staff 622,950$ $ 622,950
$ 4,153,000
Project Schedule Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
Project Type: Roadway
Kurt Dr Extension
DRAFT Page 35 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Project Number:

Project Description: Construct new 0.24 mile of 2-lane road from Purdy Rd to Kurt Drive Extension.

Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total TIM Fee 724,500$ $ 724,500
Private Development 724,500$ $ 724,500
$ 1,449,000
Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant 144,900$ $ 144,900
Planning/Env - Staff -$
Design - Consultant 217,350$ $ 217,350
Design - Staff -$
Direct Right of Way Costs -$
Right of Way Staff -$
Direct Construction Costs 869,400$ $ 869,400
Construction Staff 217,350$ $ 217,350
$ 1,449,000
Project Schedule Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
Project Type: Roadway
Purdy Dr Extension
DRAFT Page 36 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Project Number:

Project Description: Widen 0.15 miles of existing road from Purdy Rd to Kurt Drive Extension.

Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total TIM Fee 547,680$ $ 547,680
Private Development -$
$ 547,680
Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant 54,768$ $ 54,768
Planning/Env - Staff -$
Design - Consultant 82,152$ $ 82,152
Design - Staff -$
Direct Right of Way Costs -$
Right of Way Staff -$
Direct Construction Costs 328,608$ $ 328,608
Construction Staff 82,152$ $ 82,152
$ 547,680
Project Schedule Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
Project Type: Roadway
Purdy Dr Extension Widening
DRAFT Page 37 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Project Number:

Project Description: Construct new 0.53 mile of 2-lane road from Greenhorn Creek Road to Gold Cliff Road.

Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total TIM Fee 1,916,880$ $ 1,916,880
Private Development -$
$ 1,916,880
Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant 191,688$ $ 191,688
Planning/Env - Staff -$
Design - Consultant 287,532$ $ 287,532
Design - Staff -$
Direct Right of Way Costs -$
Right of Way Staff -$
Direct Construction Costs 1,150,128$ $ 1,150,128
Construction Staff 287,532$ $ 287,532
$ 1,916,880
Project Schedule Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
Project Type: Roadway
Gold Cliff Rd Extension
DRAFT Page 38 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Project Number:

Project Description: Construct new 0.17 mile of 2-lane road from Greenhorn Creek Rd to Tuolomne Avenue.

Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total TIM Fee 638,960$ $ 638,960
Private Development -$
$ 638,960
Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant 63,896$ $ 63,896
Planning/Env - Staff -$
Design - Consultant 95,844$ $ 95,844
Design - Staff -$
Direct Right of Way Costs -$
Right of Way Staff -$
Direct Construction Costs 383,376$ $ 383,376
Construction Staff 95,844$ $ 95,844
$ 638,960
Project Schedule Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
Project Type: Roadway
Sierra Avenue Connection
DRAFT Page 39 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Project Number:

Project Description: Construct new 0.17 mile of 2-lane road from Demarest Street to Stockton Road.

Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total TIM Fee 638,960$ $ 638,960
Private Development -$
$ 638,960
Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant 63,896$ $ 63,896
Planning/Env - Staff -$
Design - Consultant 95,844$ $ 95,844
Design - Staff -$
Direct Right of Way Costs -$
Right of Way Staff -$
Direct Construction Costs 383,376$ $ 383,376
Construction Staff 95,844$ $ 95,844
$ 638,960
Project Schedule Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
Project Type: Roadway
Demarest St Extension
DRAFT Page 40 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Project Number:

Project Description: Improve 0.50 mile of existing 2-lane road between SR-49 and SR-4.

Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total TIM Fee 1,802,780$ $ 1,802,780
Private Development -$
$ 1,802,780
Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant 180,278$ $ 180,278
Planning/Env - Staff -$
Design - Consultant 270,417$ $ 270,417
Design - Staff -$
Direct Right of Way Costs -$
Right of Way Staff -$
Direct Construction Costs 1,081,668$ $ 1,081,668
Construction Staff 270,417$ $ 270,417
$ 1,802,780
Project Schedule Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
Project Type: Roadway
Stockton Rd Widening
DRAFT Page 41 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Project Number:

Project Description: Widen 0.49 miles from 2-lane to 4-lane road from Dogtown Road to Murphys Grade Road.

Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total TIM Fee -$
Caltrans 2,955,190$ $ 2,955,190
$ 2,955,190
Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant 295,519$ $ 295,519
Planning/Env - Staff -$
Design - Consultant 443,279$ $ 443,279
Design - Staff -$
Direct Right of Way Costs -$
Right of Way Staff -$
Direct Construction Costs 1,773,114$ $ 1,773,114
Construction Staff 443,279$ $ 443,279
$ 2,955,190
Project Schedule Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
Project Type: Roadway
SR 49 Widening
DRAFT Page 42 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Project Number:

Project Description: Construct 0.25 mile right-turn bypass lane.

Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total TIM Fee -$
Caltrans 753,060$ $ 753,060
$ 753,060
Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant 75,306$ $ 75,306
Planning/Env - Staff -$
Design - Consultant 112,959$ $ 112,959
Design - Staff -$
Direct Right of Way Costs -$
Right of Way Staff -$
Direct Construction Costs 451,836$ $ 451,836
Construction Staff 112,959$ $ 112,959
$ 753,060
Project Schedule Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
Project Type: Roadway
Vallecito Rd/SR-4 Bypass Right Turn
DRAFT Page 43 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Project Number:

Project Description: Construct 4.00 miles of new 2-lane roadway from SR-49 North to SR-49 South.

Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total TIM Fee -$
Caltrans $ 72,196,050 $ 72,196,050
$ 72,196,050
Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant $ 7,219,605 $ 7,219,605
Planning/Env - Staff -$
Design - Consultant $ 10,829,408 $ 10,829,408
Design - Staff -$
Direct Right of Way Costs -$
Right of Way Staff -$
Direct Construction Costs $ 43,317,630 $ 43,317,630
Construction Staff $ 10,829,408 $ 10,829,408
$ 72,196,050
Project Schedule Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
Project Type: Roadway
SR-49 Bypass (Alt 3B)
DRAFT Page 44 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Project Number:

Project Description: Reconstruct bridge.

Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total TIM Fee -$
Caltrans $ 12,128,830 $ 12,128,830
$ 12,128,830
Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant $ 1,212,883 $ 1,212,883
Planning/Env - Staff -$
Design - Consultant $ 1,819,325 $ 1,819,325
Design - Staff -$
Direct Right of Way Costs -$
Right of Way Staff -$
Direct Construction Costs $ 7,277,298 $ 7,277,298
Construction Staff $ 1,819,325 $ 1,819,325
$ 12,128,830
Project Schedule Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
SR-49 Bridge Replacement
Project Type: Roadway
DRAFT Page 45 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Project Number:

Project Description: Construct new 2-lane road.

Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total TIM Fee 1,600,000$ $ 1,600,000
Private Development 1,600,000$ $ 1,600,000
$ 3,200,000
Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant 320,000$ $ 320,000
Planning/Env - Staff -$
Design - Consultant 480,000$ $ 480,000
Design - Staff -$
Direct Right of Way Costs -$
Right of Way Staff -$
Direct Construction Costs 1,920,000$ $ 1,920,000
Construction Staff 480,000$ $ 480,000
$ 3,200,000
Project Schedule Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
Road A
Project Type: Roadway
DRAFT Page 46 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Project Number:

Project Description: Construct traffic signal and intersection improvements.

Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total TIM Fee $ 40,050 $ 120,150 $ 160,200
Private Development $ 640,800 $ 640,800
$ 801,000
Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant $ 40,050 $ 40,050
Planning/Env - Staff $ -
Design - Consultant $ 120,150 $ 120,150
Design - Staff $ -
Direct Right of Way Costs $ -
Right of Way Staff $ -
Direct Construction Costs $ 520,650 $ 520,650
Construction Staff $ 120,150 $ 120,150
$ 801,000
Project Schedule Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
Traffic Signal #1 at SR-49 North and Copello Drive
Project Type: Transportation
DRAFT Page 47 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Project Number:

Project Description: Construct traffic signal and intersection improvements.

Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total TIM Fee 84,000$ $ 84,000
Private Development 336,000.0$ $ 336,000
$ 420,000
Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant -$
Planning/Env - Staff -$
Design - Consultant -$
Design - Staff -$
Direct Right of Way Costs -$
Right of Way Staff -$
Direct Construction Costs -$
Construction Staff -$
-$
Project Schedule Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
Traffic Signal #2 at SR-49 North & Stanislaus Avenue
Project Type: Transportation
DRAFT Page 48 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Project Number:

Project Description: Construct traffic signal and intersection improvements.

Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total TIM Fee 400,500$ $ 400,500
Private Development 400,500$ $ 400,500
$ 801,000
Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant 80,100$ $ 80,100
Planning/Env - Staff -$
Design - Consultant 120,150$ $ 120,150
Design - Staff -$
Direct Right of Way Costs -$
Right of Way Staff -$
Direct Construction Costs 480,600$ $ 480,600
Construction Staff 120,150$ $ 120,150
$ 801,000
Project Schedule Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
Project Type: Transportation
Traffic Signal #3 at SR-49 North and Angel Oaks Drive
DRAFT Page 49 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Project Number:

Project Description: Construct traffic signal.

Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total TIM Fee $ 63,000 $ 147,000 $ 210,000
Private Development $ 210,000 $ 210,000
$ 420,000
Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant $ -
Planning/Env - Staff $ -
Design - Consultant $ 63,000 $ 63,000
Design - Staff $ -
Direct Right of Way Costs $ -
Right of Way Staff $ -
Direct Construction Costs $ 252,000 $ 252,000
Construction Staff $ 63,000 $ 63,000
$ 378,000
Project Schedule Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
Traffic Signal #4 at SR-49 North and Bret Harte Road
Project Type: Transportation
DRAFT Page 50 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Project Number: TS5
Project Description: Construct traffic signal.

Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total TIM Fee 801,000$ $ 801,000
Private Development -$
$ 801,000
Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant 80,100$ $ 80,100
Planning/Env - Staff -$
Design - Consultant 120,150$ $ 120,150
Design - Staff -$
Direct Right of Way Costs -$
Right of Way Staff -$
Direct Construction Costs 480,600$ $ 480,600
Construction Staff 120,150$ $ 120,150
$ 801,000
Project Schedule Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
Traffic Signal #5 at SR-49 North and Angel Oaks Extension Project Type: Transportation
DRAFT Page 51 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Project Number: TS6
Project Description: Construct traffic signal.

Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total TIM Fee 420,000$ $ 420,000
$ 420,000
Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant -$
Planning/Env - Staff -$
Design - Consultant 63,000$ $ 63,000
Design - Staff -$
Direct Right of Way Costs -$
Right of Way Staff -$
Direct Construction Costs 294,000$ $ 294,000
Construction Staff 63,000$ $ 63,000
$ 420,000
Project Schedule Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
Traffic Signal #6 at Angel Oaks Dr Extension and Foundry Lane Extension Project Type: Transportation
DRAFT Page 52 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Project Number: TS7
Project Description: Construct traffic signal and intersection improvements.

Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total TIM Fee 1,773,000$ $ 1,773,000
Private Development -$
$ 1,773,000
Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant 177,300$ $ 177,300
Planning/Env - Staff -$
Design - Consultant -$
Design - Staff 265,950$ $ 265,950
Direct Right of Way Costs -$
Right of Way Staff -$
Direct Construction Costs 1,063,800$ $ 1,063,800
Construction Staff 265,950$ $ 265,950
$ 1,773,000
Project Schedule Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
Project Type: Transportation
Traffic Signal #7 at Kurt Drive Extension and Murphys Grade Road DRAFT Page 53 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Project Number: TS8
Project Description: Construct traffic signal.

Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total TIM Fee 420,000$ $ 420,000
$ 420,000
Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant -$
Planning/Env - Staff -$
Design - Consultant 63,000$ $ 63,000
Design - Staff -$
Direct Right of Way Costs -$
Right of Way Staff -$
Direct Construction Costs 294,000$ $ 294,000
Construction Staff 63,000$ $ 63,000
$ 420,000
Project Schedule Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
Traffic Signal #8 at SR 49 Bypass and SR 49 North
Project Type: Transportation
DRAFT Page 54 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Project Number: TS9
Project Description: Construct traffic signal.

Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total TIM Fee 420,000$ $ 420,000
$ 420,000
Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant -$
Planning/Env - Staff -$
Design - Consultant 63,000$ $ 63,000
Design - Staff -$
Direct Right of Way Costs -$
Right of Way Staff -$
Direct Construction Costs 294,000$ $ 294,000
Construction Staff 63,000$ $ 63,000
$ 420,000
Project Schedule Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
Project Type: Transportation
Traffic Signal #9 at SR 49 Bypass and SR 4 West
DRAFT Page 55 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Project Number: TS10
Project Description: Construct traffic signal.

Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total TIM 210,000$ $ 210,000
Caltrans 210,000$ $ 210,000
$ 420,000
Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant -$
Planning/Env - Staff -$
Design - Consultant -$
Design - Staff -$
Direct Right of Way Costs -$
Right of Way Staff -$
Direct Construction Costs -$
Construction Staff -$
Project Schedule Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
Traffic Signal #11 at SR 49 & Murphys Grade Road
Project Type: Transportation
DRAFT Page 57 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Project Number: TS12
Project Description: Construct traffic signal
Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total Caltrans 420,000$ $ 420,000
$ 420,000
Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant -$
Planning/Env - Staff -$
Design - Consultant 63,000$ $ 63,000
Design - Staff -$
Direct Right of Way Costs -$
Right of Way Staff -$
Direct Construction Costs 294,000$ $ 294,000
Construction Staff 63,000$ $ 63,000
$ 420,000
Project Schedule Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
Traffic Signal #12 at SR 49 Bypass and SR49 South
Project Type: Transportation
DRAFT Page 58 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Project Type: Transportation
Project Number: TS13
Project Description: Construct traffic signal.

Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total Caltrans 420,000$ $ 420,000
$ 420,000
Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant -$
Planning/Env - Staff -$
Design - Consultant 63,000$ $ 63,000
Design - Staff -$
Direct Right of Way Costs -$
Right of Way Staff -$
Direct Construction Costs 294,000$ $ 294,000
Construction Staff 63,000$ $ 63,000
$ 420,000
Project Schedule Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
Traffic Signal #13 at SR 49 and Vallecito Road
DRAFT Page 59 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Wastewater Rate (300)
Project Name FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total East Trunk Sewer Phase 1/Vallecitos Road
Sewer Phase 1 Replacement $55,000 $690,000 $630,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,375,000 Sewer System Replacement Program, Phase 1 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 Sewer System Replacement Program, Phase 2 $115,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $115,000 Sewer System Replacement Program, Phase 3 $0 $0 $55,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $55,000 Grit Removal System $0 $135,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $135,000 Minor Wastewater Repairs $0 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $0 $125,000 Wastewater Rates (300) Subtotal: $670,000 $850,000 $710,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $0 $2,305,000 Wastewater Connection Fee (305)
Project Name FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Sewer System Replacement Program, Phase 3 -$ -$ 225,000$ -$ -$ -$ $ 225,000 - $ Holman Dam Emergency Action Plan 24,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $ - $ 24,000 Sludge Handling and Storage Area 150,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $ 150,000 - $ EQ Basin Divider Wall 50,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $ - $ 50,000 Wastewater Connection Fee (305) Subtotal: 224,000$ -$ 225,000$ -$ -$ -$ $ 449,000 - $ Capital Replacement - Sewer (Loan to Water)
Project Name FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Water Transmission Main Augmentation Project 165,000$ $ 165,000 Wastewater Funds Total: $894,000 $850,000 $935,000 $25,000 $25,000 $190,000 $0 $2,919,000 Wastewater Funds
Project Type: Wastewater
DRAFT Page 60 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
East Trunk Sewer Phase 1/Vallecitos Road Sewer Phase 1 Replacement Project Type: Wastewater
Project Number: WW1
Project Description:

Funding Source FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Wastewater Rate (300) $ 55,000 $ 690,000 $ 630,000 $ 1,375,000 Wastewater Connection Fee
(305)
$ 1,375,000
Expenditures FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant $ -
Planning/Env - Staff $ -
Design - Consultant $ 55,000 $ 55,000 $ 110,000
Design - Staff $ -
Direct Right of Way Costs $ -
Right of Way Staff $ -
Direct Construction Costs $ 550,000 $ 550,000 $ 1,100,000 Construction Staff $ 85,000 $ 80,000 $ 165,000
$ 1,375,000
Project Schedule FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
Sewer pipe along Angels Creek.

Upsizing and rehabilitating of the City of Angels Trunk Sewer, and replacement of trunk mains in Vallecito Road (formerly known as Booster Way Sewer Project).

DRAFT Page 61 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Sewer System Replacement Program, Phase 1
Project Type: Wastewater
Project Number: WW2
Project Description: Replacement of collection sewer mains in Main Street from Church Street to Vallecito Road.

Funding Source FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Wastewater Rate (300) $ 500,000 $ 500,000
Wastewater Connection Fee
(305) -$
$ 500,000
Expenditures FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant -$
Planning/Env - Staff -$
Design - Consultant $ 40,000 $ 40,000
Design - Staff -$
Direct Right of Way Costs -$
Right of Way Staff -$
Direct Construction Costs $ 400,000 $ 400,000
Construction Staff $ 60,000 $ 60,000
$ 500,000
Project Schedule FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
DRAFT Page 62 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Sewer System Replacement Program, Phase 2
Project Type: Wastewater
Project Number: WW3
Project Description: Replacement of collection sewer mains in Gardner Lane and Easy Street.

Funding Source FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Wastewater Rate (300) $ 115,000 $ 115,000
Wastewater Connection Fee
(305) -$
$ 115,000
Expenditures FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant -$
Planning/Env - Staff -$
Design - Consultant $ 10,000 $ 10,000
Design - Staff -$
Direct Right of Way Costs -$
Right of Way Staff -$
Direct Construction Costs $ 95,000 $ 95,000
Construction Staff $ 10,000 $ 10,000
$ 115,000
Project Schedule FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
Gardner Lane sewer main. Easy Street sewer main.

DRAFT Page 63 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Sewer System Replacement Program, Phase 3
Project Type: Wastewater
Project Number: WW4
Project Description: Replacement of collection sewer mains in Rasberry Lane and Lee Lane.

Funding Source FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Wastewater Rate (300) $ 55,000 $ 55,000
Wastewater Connection Fee
(305) $ 225,000 $ 225,000
$ 280,000
Expenditures FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant $ -
Planning/Env - Staff $ -
Design - Consultant $ 20,000 $ 20,000
Design - Staff $ -
Direct Right of Way Costs $ -
Right of Way Staff $ -
Direct Construction Costs $ 225,000 $ 225,000
Construction Staff $ 35,000 $ 35,000
$ 280,000
Project Schedule FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
DRAFT Page 64 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Holman Dam Emergency Action Plan
Project Type: Wastewater
Project Number: WW5
Project Description:

Funding Source FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Wastewater Rate (300) -$
Wastewater Connection Fee
(305) $ 24,000 $ 24,000
$ 24,000
Expenditures FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant $ 24,000 $ 24,000
Planning/Env - Staff -$
Design - Consultant -$
Design - Staff -$
Direct Right of Way Costs -$
Right of Way Staff -$
Direct Construction Costs -$
Construction Staff -$
$ 24,000
Project Schedule FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
Dam inundation study mandated by the State of California, Divison of Safety of Dams and preparation of an Emergency Action Plan.

DRAFT Page 65 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Sludge Handling and Storage Area
Project Type: Wastewater
Project Number: WW6
Project Description:

Funding Source FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Wastewater Connection Fee
(305) $ 150,000 $ 150,000
$ 150,000
Expenditures FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant -$
Planning/Env - Staff -$
Design - Consultant $ 10,000 $ 10,000
Design - Staff -$
Direct Right of Way Costs -$
Right of Way Staff -$
Direct Construction Costs $ 130,000 $ 130,000
Construction Staff $ 10,000 $ 10,000
$ 150,000
Project Schedule FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
Sludge bed cover over drying bed
Procurement and installation of cover for elevated sludge Bed. Construction of additional drying bed for storage of stockpiled sludge.

DRAFT Page 66 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
EQ Basin Divider Wall
Project Type: Wastewater
Project Number: WW7
Project Description:

Funding Source FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Wastewater Connection Fee
(305) $ 50,000 $ 50,000
$ 50,000
Expenditures FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant -$
Planning/Env - Staff -$
Design - Consultant -$
Design - Staff $ 10,000 $ 10,000
Direct Right of Way Costs -$
Right of Way Staff -$
Direct Construction Costs $ 40,000 $ 40,000
Construction Staff -$
$ 50,000
Project Schedule FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
Equalization basin
Construction of concrete dividing wall to minimize short-circuiting in Equalization (EQ) Basin. Division of EQ Basin into two cells will facilitate periodic inspection, repair and maintenance.

DRAFT Page 67 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Grit Removal System
Project Type: Wastewater
Project Number: WW8
Project Description:

Funding Source FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Wastewater Rate (300) 135,000$ $ 135,000
$ 135,000
Expenditures FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant -$
Planning/Env - Staff -$
Design - Consultant 15,000$ $ 15,000
Design - Staff -$
Direct Right of Way Costs -$
Right of Way Staff -$
Direct Construction Costs 110,000$ $ 110,000
Construction Staff 10,000$ $ 10,000
$ 135,000
Project Schedule FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
Construct grit chamber at wastewater treatment plant headworks to remove sand and grit from influent wastewater during high flow events. Install grit handling equipment including grit pumps and grit washer/classifier to facilitate grit disposal. (Deferred request from FY 19/20) DRAFT Page 68 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Minor Wastewater Repairs
Project Type: Wastewater
Project Number: WW9
Project Description: Minor or emergency sewer repairs.

Funding Source FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Wastewater Rate (300) $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000
Expenditures FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant $ -
Planning/Env - Staff $ -
Design - Consultant $ -
Design - Staff $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 25,000 Direct Right of Way Costs $ -
Right of Way Staff $ -
Direct Construction Costs $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 75,000 Construction Staff $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 25,000 $ 125,000
Project Schedule FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
DRAFT Page 69 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Water Rate (350)
Project Name FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Water Transmission Main Augmentation Project $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,370,000 $1,370,000 SCADA Plant Automation $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $325,000 Water Treatment Plant Backwash Handling Improvements
Project $130,000 $155,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $285,000
Water Treatment Plant Filter Replacement/Expansion
Project $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $2,000,000 Water System Replacement Program Phase 1, SR 49 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000 Water System Replacement Program Phase 2, Main Street $0 $0 $315,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $315,000 Minor Water Repairs $0 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $0 $125,000 Automated Water Meter Readers $0 $25,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $300,000 $525,000 Water Rates (350) Subtotal: $180,000 $180,000 $340,000 $1,025,000 $1,025,000 $25,000 $1,670,000 $4,445,000 Water Connection Fee (355)
Project Name FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Water Transmission Main Augmentation Project $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 525,000 $ 525,000 Water Treatment Plant Filter Replacement/Expansion
Project -$ -$ 270,000 $ $ 555,000 $ 500,000 -$ $ 1,325,000 - $ Water System Replacement Program Phase 2, Main Street $ - $ - $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 75,000 Water Connection Fee (355) Subtotal: $ - $ - $ 345,000 $ 555,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ 525,000 $ 1,925,000 Capital Replacement - Water
Project Name FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Water Treatment Plant Backwash Handling Improvements
Project -$ 1,335,000 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ $ 1,335,000 - $
Water System Replacement Program Phase 1, SR 49 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 Capital Replacement - Water Subtotal: $ 100,000 $ 1,335,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,435,000 Water Funds Total: $280,000 $1,515,000 $685,000 $1,580,000 $1,525,000 $25,000 $2,195,000 $7,805,000 Water Funds
Project Type: Water
DRAFT Page 70 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
SCADA Plant Automation
Project Type: Water
Project Number: 52100
Project Description:

Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total O&M (350) $ 25,000 300,000$ 325,000$
Capacity Fees (355) -$
Capital Replacement - Water -$
Capital Replacement - Sewer
(Transfer) -$
-$
-$
325,000$
Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant -$
Planning/Env - Staff -$
Design - Consultant -$
Design - Staff -$
Direct Right of Way Costs -$
Right of Way Staff -$
Direct Construction Costs $ 25,000 25,000$
Construction Staff -$
25,000$
Project Schedule Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
Upgrade SCADA system of the Water Treatment Plantand improve conectivity with the Wastewater Treatment Plant.

DRAFT Page 71 of 78
Water Transmission Main Augmentation Project
Project Type: Water
Project Number: W1
Project Description:

Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total O&M (350) $ 1,370,000 $ 1,370,000
Capacity Fees (355) $ 525,000 $ 525,000
Capital Replacement - Water -$
Capital Replacement - Sewer
(Transfer) 165,000$ $ 165,000
-$
-$
$ 2,060,000
Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant -$
Planning/Env - Staff -$
Design - Consultant 165,000$ $ 165,000
Design - Staff -$
Direct Right of Way Costs -$
Right of Way Staff -$
Direct Construction Costs $ 1,650,000 $ 1,650,000
Construction Staff $ 245,000 $ 245,000
$ 2,060,000
Project Schedule Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
Construction of a parallel 16-inch pipeline to convey treated water from the Water Treatment Plant storage tank and clearwell to the CIty distribution system.

DRAFT Page 72 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Water Treatment Plant Backwash Handling Improvements Project Project Type: Water
Project Number: 52143
Project Description:

Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total O&M (350) $ 130,000 155,000$ 300,000$ 585,000$
Capacity Fees (355) -$
Capital Replacement - Water $ 1,335,000 $ 1,335,000
Capital Replacement - Sewer
(Transfer) -$
-$
-$
1,920,000$
Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant -$
Planning/Env - Staff -$
Design - Consultant $ 130,000 130,000$
Design - Staff -$
Direct Right of Way Costs -$
Right of Way Staff -$
Direct Construction Costs 1,300,000$ 1,300,000$
Construction Staff 190,000$ 190,000$
1,620,000$
Project Schedule Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
Example of an inclined plate clarifier.

Installation of an inclined plate clarifier to reclaim backwash water and to process residuals from periodic cleaning of the sedimentation basin while eliminating non-permitted discharges. Combination of solids dewatering facility for backwater residuals/sedimentation basin sludge.

DRAFT Page 73 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Water Treatment Plant Filter Replacement/Expansion Project Project Type: Water
Project Number: W3
Project Description:

Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total O&M (350) 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 300,000$ 2,300,000$
Capacity Fees (355) 270,000$ 555,000$ 500,000$ 1,325,000$ Capital Replacement - Water $ -
Capital Replacement - Sewer
(Transfer) 55,000$ 55,000$
3,680,000$
Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant -$
Planning/Env - Staff -$
Design - Consultant 270,000$ 270,000$
Design - Staff -$
Direct Right of Way Costs -$
Right of Way Staff -$
Direct Construction Costs 1,350,000$ 1,350,000$ 2,700,000$ Construction Staff 205,000$ 205,000$ 410,000$
3,380,000$
Project Schedule Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
Example of a pressure filter.

Replacement of the three existing filters with two larger filters to increase the capacity of the water treatment plant.

DRAFT Page 74 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Water System Replacement Program Phase 1, SR 49
Project Type: Water
Project Number: 52144
Project Description: Replacement of key distribution pipelines along SR-49.

Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total O&M (350) $ 25,000 300,000$ $ 325,000
Capacity Fees (355) -$
Capital Replacement - Water $ 100,000 $ 100,000
Capital Replacement - Sewer
(Transfer)
$ 425,000
Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant -$
Planning/Env - Staff -$
Design - Consultant $ 10,000 $ 10,000
Design - Staff -$
Direct Right of Way Costs -$
Right of Way Staff -$
Direct Construction Costs $ 100,000 $ 100,000
Construction Staff $ 15,000 $ 15,000
$ 125,000
Project Schedule Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
Example of water main replacement construction.

DRAFT Page 75 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Water System Replacement Program Phase 2, Main Street
Project Type: Water
Project Number: 52145
Project Description: Upsizing of key distribution pipelines in Main Street.

Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total O&M (350) $ 315,000 $ 300,000 $ 615,000
Capacity Fees (355) $ 75,000 $ 75,000
Capital Replacement - Water
Capital Replacement - Sewer
(Transfer)
$ 690,000
Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant $ -
Planning/Env - Staff $ -
Design - Consultant $ 30,000 $ 30,000
Design - Staff $ -
Direct Right of Way Costs $ -
Right of Way Staff $ -
Direct Construction Costs $ 310,000 $ 310,000
Construction Staff $ 50,000 $ 50,000
$ 390,000
Project Schedule Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
DRAFT Page 76 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Minor Water Repairs
Project Type: Water
Project Number: W6
Project Description: Construct minor and/or emergency water repairs.

Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total O&M (350) $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 125,000 Capacity Fees (355) 0
Capital Replacement - Water
Capital Replacement - Sewer
(Transfer)
$ 125,000
Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant $ -
Planning/Env - Staff $ -
Design - Consultant
Design - Staff $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 25,000 Direct Right of Way Costs $ -
Right of Way Staff $ -
Direct Construction Costs $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 75,000 Construction Staff $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 25,000 $ 125,000
Project Schedule Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
DRAFT Page 77 of 78
Angels Camp CIP
Automated Water Meter Readers
Project Type: Water
Project Number: W7
Project Description: Develop system of automated water meter readers that will be installed over multiple years.

Funding Source Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total O&M (350) 25,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 300,000$ $ 525,000 Capacity Fees (355)
Capital Replacement - Water
Capital Replacement - Sewer
(Transfer)
$ 525,000
Expenditures Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Total Planning/Env - Consultant
Planning/Env - Staff
Design - Consultant 25,000$ $ 25,000
Design - Staff
Direct Right of Way Costs
Right of Way Staff
Direct Construction Costs 40,000$ 40,000$ 40,000$ 40,000$ 250,000$ $ 410,000 Construction Staff 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 50,000$ $ 90,000 $ 525,000
Project Schedule Prior FY FY19/20 FY20/21 FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 FY24/25 Future Planning/Env
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Warranty
DRAFT Page 78 of 78
City of Angels Council Meeting
JUNE 7, 2022 CORRESPONDENCE 10.A

A. Greenhorn Creek Landscape and Lighting District, Richard Gutierrez ___________________________________________________________________

City of Angels Council Meeting
JUNE 7, 2022 CORRESPONDENCE 10.B
B. News and Notes for the Week of May 2, 2022
___________________________________________________________________

CITY HALL
CITY OF ANGELS PO Box 667, 200 Monte Verda St. Suite B, Angels Camp, CA 95222 P: (209) 736-2181 DATE: May 6, 2022
TO: City Council
FROM: Rebecca Callen, City Administrator
RE: NEWS AND NOTES FOR THE WEEK OF MAY 2, 2022

DISCUSSION
It is important for the Council to see and the public to be aware of the work that is done every day by hardworking staff. With COVID the regular communications and updates ended, while staff has continued to make meaningful progress across all of the City’s functions. The Council will get these weekly reports as there are updates to give.

Administration Update
Conference call with Citygate to discuss proposal changes. Met with Interwest to discuss getting additional assistance when there is a conflict between the Inspector and the Contractor/owner. This will limit the bottlenecks and also ensure timely responses and a mediator with experience in building codes and structural engineering. Held a monthly Department Head meeting. This is our second one, due to me being out last month. Very productive discussions and a lot of excitement from staff about the electronic purchase order system I set up, getting Comcast, and Microsoft 365. Attended the CCOG meeting via Zoom to give an update on the Murphys Grade Project (not done yet) and request an exemption on the timely use of funds for CMAQ funding to align with the Angels Creek Trail project.

Construction is slated to begin in 2024/2025 FY.

Fire Update
No report
Police Update
Police Activities- 72 Calls for Service/CAD Incidents 2 x misdemeanor arrest for driving on a suspended DL 1 x Felony arrest for domestic violence and resisting arrest 1 x misdemeanor arrest for warrant 5/3 Chief attending a fair planning meeting to discuss fair operations 5/4 Teresa and Officer Kirkman met

CITY HALL
CITY OF ANGELS PO Box 667, 200 Monte Verda St. Suite B, Angels Camp, CA 95222 P: (209) 736-2181 with BHHS Principal Holt to discuss the PD/BHHS Crisis Response box 5/5 Sgt. Savage prepared and deployed message boards for road closure notice (Youth Parade) 5/5 Chief and Teresa attended Everbridge training with CCOES ACPD secured approximately $13,000 in Homeland Security Grant funds. The majority of these funds will be utilized to outfit a new patrol vehicle being purchased during the 22'-23' FY Chief is working with Homeland Security Grant group to work on the purchase of 1 to 2 surveillance trailers that can be utilized by all group participants. ACPD is working on policy updates to include policy and city ordinance related to Military Use equipment. This is a mandated state requirement per AB 481
Engineering Update
No report
Public Works Update
Was working on high priority state reporting.

Water/Wastewater Update
Was working on high priority state reporting.

Building Update
Building and Planning took questions and prepared responses for the 5/3/22 Variance at 195 Rocky Ridge. The variance was approved by Council. Staff prepared the agenda and staff report for the 5/12/22 Planning Commission meeting. The primary item will be The Quarry Downtown. A reuse of the building at 1177 South Main to become an event space available for lease. On 5/12/22, the Planning Commission will host an OPEN HOUSE at the Fire Station from 5:00 p.m. - 6:00 p.m. to take public input on draft Greenhouse Gas Reduction Measures for the City. Consultants will be present online to take questions. An online presentation and survey were previously released. The Survey closes 5/16/22 and everyone is urged to take the survey and provide input. The survey is on the City's website and can be accessed as follows: Full Survey URL: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSf8GyoqKD9M_8JhiwsRQ_u0-BVb1HuO9Kz8QKgS4Y-xMHzSQ/viewform?usp=sf_link Shortened Survey URL:
https://tinyurl.com/5n744tbs Planning participated in the Calaveras COG Preparedness Plan and Evacuation Needs Assessment project providing comments on the Existing Conditions and Debrief

CITY HALL
CITY OF ANGELS PO Box 667, 200 Monte Verda St. Suite B, Angels Camp, CA 95222 P: (209) 736-2181 documents. Staff continued coordinating special events permits related to banners and decorations, Junior Frog Jump, Youth Parade, Drive-Thru Dinner at the Park, and Mr. Frog's Wild Ride. Staff coordinated with MACT to present the Council's offer to lease or sell the parking lot at the City's Police Dept./City Hall parcel. MACT accepted the Council's offer and price to sell. Staff will be coordinating with the City Attorney to sell the parcel.

Finance Update
Discussed next steps with PARS and GonInvest for Pension and OPEB liabilities.

DAC Update
Nothing to report. Debbie is reporting to the DAC Board. While those report outs are being emailed to Council and City staff, they do not include long range planning updates or information as to the correlation of DAC activities to the contract with the City of Angels. These are also not available on their website for public review. The City Administrator asked that DAC prepare a report for the 2021-22 Fiscal Year to present to the Council in addition to proposing the scope of work for the 2022-23 Fiscal Year Budget for discussion and direction from Council. Debbie’s stated that it is DAC’s goal to have a DAC Representative at City Council meetings to comment, provide feedback, etc. as needed. I requested that I receive the draft reports no later than May 11, 2022 to include in the May 17th Council meeting.

Museum Update
The City Administrator has requested a repot from CVB for the 2021-22 Fiscal Year. Discussions about proposed budget considerations occurred between the Museum Director (Martin Huberty) and the City Administrator. These proposed expenses related to the protection of the facilities and inventory.

City of Angels Council Meeting
JUNE 7, 2022 CORRESPONDENCE 10.C

C. News and Notes for the Week of May 9, 2022
___________________________________________________________________

CITY HALL
CITY OF ANGELS PO Box 667, 200 Monte Verda St. Suite B, Angels Camp, CA 95222 P: (209) 736-2181 1 DATE: May 13, 2022
TO: City Council
FROM: Rebecca Callen, City Administrator
RE: NEWS AND NOTES FOR THE WEEK OF MAY 9, 2022

RECOMMENDATION
No action is required.

DISCUSSION
It is important for the Council to see and the public to be aware of the work that is done every day by hardworking staff. The Council will get these weekly reports as there are updates to give.

Administration Update
Michelle Gonzalez started on Monday as the new Finance Director. Interviewed for the Account Technician I/II and made an offer to a candidate. They have accepted and will be starting in 2 weeks.

Murphys Grade road sidewalk project is being held up by a subcontractor. Dewberry is working with them to get back on track in order to complete and closeout.

Met with Govinvest to go over the Labor Costing module. Can help with negotiations and costing labor across multiple years based on various scenarios. Met with Joel (UWPA) and Summer (UPUD) to discuss the UWPA budget, review various scenarios, and assisted Joel to tighten up components of the budget.

Attended the UWPA Budget Committee meeting. Further discussed concerns about the COA and UPUD being overtaxed with contributions to UWPA. supported a one-year contribution to UWPA with a coordinated effort to find grants, loans, and the potential to amend the JPA agreement to support cash flow should grants be reimbursable.

Attended a conference call to discuss the last mile options for broadband. Joel will be reaching out to the two local superintendents and I will be working with PD to see if there are any options to extend the middle mile for our City.

Attended a Utica System Tour with Summer, led by Joel. Had a lot of great discussions about the system and how each organization can incorporate it into our respective customer outreach.

CITY HALL
CITY OF ANGELS PO Box 667, 200 Monte Verda St. Suite B, Angels Camp, CA 95222 P: (209) 736-2181 2 Met with Police Union to discuss some areas in the MOU that need to be corrected. Will be submitting written proposals for them to take to their membership
Fire Update
This week FD has been prioritizing weed abatement and Veg. Mgmt. All staff is involved in Wildland refresher training preparing for Wildland Fire season. We hired (1) Extra Hire PT firefighter, this will minimize Overtime of FT staff and save money. We put out an internal application for LT position that was approved in the MOU. I anticipate 1-2 internal applicants. Working on Budget with City Administrator. Preparing future EMS/Paramedic proposal plan.

Police Update
No report this week.

Engineering Update
Murphys Grade: Contractor started the week on their 9th day of Liquidated Damages (at $4,000 per day). The contractor provided short notice of no work on Monday and was hit with a working day.

Contractor and RE are currently working through 75 punch list items. I confirmed that the Pizza place owner made and arrangement to get his parking area re-paved at his own expense. We have started planning a ribbon cutting event. Date TBD. I will get the Caltrans reimbursement invoice to the City today/tomorrow.

Angels Creek Trail: An online meeting has been set up for Wednesday May 18th at 3pm to discuss the cultural technical studies.

HSIP Signs, RSTP Striping, and Caltrans Detour Plan: The City-wide street map has been drafted and all streets labeled. This CAD work we be used as a base map for the bid packages as well as the Encroachment Permit submittal. The HSIP and RSTP projects will go out to bid as soon as I can get them out to bid. My estimate is July/August.

Copello Way Striping for Habitat for Humanity: roadway cross section striping was provided to Habitat for Humanity to include a buffered Bike/Ped facility. The striping cross section will be: 2ft shoulder - 11 ft lane - 11ft lane - 2 ft buffered zone - 6ft bike/ped facility. The bike/ped facility will be on the south side of the street so it can connect to the Main Street Plan future improvements. Truck turn templates will be run to ensure trucks will not off track onto the bike/ped area when making a right turn onto Hwy

49. CITY HALL
CITY OF ANGELS PO Box 667, 200 Monte Verda St. Suite B, Angels Camp, CA 95222 P: (209) 736-2181 3 LLD: The Draft Final Engineers report and two resolutions will be on the council meeting next week.

Expect residents to turn out for this meeting on both sides of issue (pro and con assessment change). If successful the assessment will double be moving forward.

CCOG: I need to prepare RSTP reimbursement invoices
49 Sidewalks: I need to prepare the final invoice for this project and transfer remaining RSTP to the Murphys Grade Project
Sonora Street: I spoke to Allen Lao, a Caltrans District 10 PM. He agreed to pursue the repair work at the intersection of Sonora and Hwy 49 as an Emergency Repair project.

Public Works Update
Staff worked with Cal-Fire Vallecito crew to weed eat and brush Vallecito Rd. and Greenhorn Creek Drive. Staff also continued weed eating and brushing on Amador St. Fairview Rd and Utica Park. They also trimmed the shrubs in front of City Hall, mowed Gateway and Tryon parks Staff started painting the curbs on Murphy's Grade for the no parking areas. They did some repair work to a meter at 565 Gardner lane and picked up trash along Dogtown Rd.

Staff put up the flags for Memorial Day/Frog Jump and put out the road closure warning signs for the parade.

Staff also responded to three work orders five service requests and one USA digs.

Water/Wastewater Update
Staff continues with daily O&M of the treatment plants and spray fields. The water treatment operators worked with a dive team to complete the cleaning and inspection of the 2.5 million gallon clear well at the water plant. The monthly water report for April was completed.

Wastewater staff worked on and completed all fire breaks around the spray field property and moved some dirt for the P.D.s shooting range. Staff continues bio-solids drying operations and ran the belt filter press this week.

Building Update
No report this week.

CITY HALL
CITY OF ANGELS PO Box 667, 200 Monte Verda St. Suite B, Angels Camp, CA 95222 P: (209) 736-2181 4 Finance Update
We had interviews for the Accounting Technician open position. Made an offer to the candidate and they have accepted the position. They will begin Tuesday, May 31, 2022.

Spoke with RAMS CPA and have begun the transition of moving all entries and reconciliations back inhouse. We have a few items to post from RAMS outstanding list, once this is complete we will have bank statements through March 31, 2022.

Next week Springbrook will host Application Overview session with City staff. The focus of these sessions with Springbrook will be on Finance and Utility Billing. Finally, more cross training set for next week with Andrea. I will focus on working at the AR desk and getting it ready for the new Accounting Technician.

DAC Update
DAC submitted a multi-year report of accomplishments and a proposed scope for 2022-23. Will be presenting at the May 17 Council Meeting.

Museum Update
Martin is working on a report and associated presentation to the Council for a meeting in June. Will be meeting with the City Administrator the week of the 16th to discuss next steps and any concerns going forward, given he is also running for Board of Supervisor for Calaveras County.

City of Angels Council Meeting
JUNE 7, 2022 CORRESPONDENCE 10.D
D. News and Notes for the Week of May 16, 2022
___________________________________________________________________

CITY HALL
CITY OF ANGELS PO Box 667, 200 Monte Verda St. Suite B, Angels Camp, CA 95222 P: (209) 736-2181 DATE: June 3, 2022
TO: City Council
FROM: Rebecca Callen, City Administrator
RE: NEWS AND NOTES FOR THE WEEK OF MAY 16, 2022

RECOMMENDATION
No action is required.

DISCUSSION
The Council needs to see the public to be aware of the work that is done every day by hardworking staff. With COVID the regular communications and updates ended, while staff has continued to make meaningful progress across all of the City’s functions. The Council will get these weekly reports as there are updates to give.

Administration Update
Met (online) with Nexus to plan out the 365 migration.

Met with Chris O'Flinn to go over budget and areas of concern for Public Works, deferred maintenance, etc.

Met (online) with Utility Group to discuss ADU policies. The best solution is to have City policy mirror the other Utilities to ensure we aren't complicating the process between jurisdictions. Met with Sandi Kraft.

There are cost-saving solutions in our copy machine/leases. Need to work through lease agreements and determine where we can correct charges as well as align the end of the contract with new contracts that are cost savings to the City going forward.

Met with CCOG for TAC meeting.

CITY HALL
CITY OF ANGELS PO Box 667, 200 Monte Verda St. Suite B, Angels Camp, CA 95222 P: (209) 736-2181 The City Council meeting was on the 17th. Very long meeting but very productive. Having to do a lot of catch-ups to get us on track at this point.

Worked on the budget. There are a lot of changes in structure that are needed. While the document has included a lot of narratives, this version will focus on aligning sources with uses, and then we will fold in a more substantive narrative upon getting phase II of the strategic plan.

Coordinated with Joel (UWPA) to have a fair booth. Developed a City Newsletter for attendees to take.

Discussed IT planning with Kris Jack. Working on an IT RFP to better serve the City going forward.

Attended Fair Kick-Off dinner and Parade downtown.

Responded to DAC scope. Need more detailed scope in response to what the City is paying for.

Ordered laptop for PD (funded with Cannabis grant)
Fire Update
Nothing to report
Police Update
Weekly Update 5/13-5/19 114 Calls for Service and Office Initiated 7 Misdemeanor Arrests - 5/15 (3) Arrests for Public Intoxication - 5/18 (1) Unlicensed Driver - 5/18 (1) Burglary - 5/19 (1) Trespassing and Public Intoxication - 5/19 (1) Spousal Battery 1 Felony Arrest - 5/18 (1) Out of State Felony Warrant Other Activity - 5/16 Pre-Event Parade Meeting - 5/18 Youth Parade Engineering Update
Nothing to report
Public Works Update

CITY HALL
CITY OF ANGELS PO Box 667, 200 Monte Verda St. Suite B, Angels Camp, CA 95222 P: (209) 736-2181 The Public Works staff has been tied up with meter reading all week. Staff also set up and took down all the signage for the Frog Jump parade. They also repaired the Frog Jump banner on Main Street. Staff also had to cut up and clean up an oak tree that had fallen on Gardener Lane.

Water/Wastewater Update
Staff continues daily O&M of both treatment plants and spray fields. Staff repaired a leak in the chlorine system at the water plant and replaced two floats in the Re-reg pond at the spray fields. Staff will be setting up for discharge to Greenhorn Creek Golf Course next week. The monthly wastewater report and annual D.R.I.N.K. (E.A.R) report were completed this week.

Building Update
Work up from 5/12/22 Planning Commission meeting. Set PC Angels Creek walk for 5/27/22. Coordinate final submittals for Youth Parade. Special events - coordination for Memorial in the Park. Began response to a request for information from CA Dpt. of Parks and Recreation re: Lightner Mine Utica Park Expansion. Research/coordination with Land and Structure for infrastructure improvement plans for Habitat for Humanity (Copello Road, Pedestrian facilities). Teleconference with the potential developer and follow-up with City Fire Dpt. Research/respond to request to use City Parking lot for food trucks/events. Process invoices from Dewberry, Augustine. Issue building permits, and coordinate building permit reviews and site visits. Banner installation and removal coordination with Caltrans.

Respond to landowner requests re: potential for goats for defensible space. Legal noticing for 6/9/22 Planning Commission - Smoke Shop Use Permit at Savemart Shopping Center. Ongoing coordination with MACT re: Parking Lot.

Finance Update
Focus training on AR desk procedures and spoke with Andrea regarding duties once new Accounting Tech begins. Cross-trained on utility billing, cash receipts, and meter reading. I processed the ACH Batch for Utility monthly payments and signed into US Bank to make the transfer. Entered RAMS and CPA AJEs for FY 2021 and verified posting to the trial balance. Read through Audit Report and Management letter and responded to Larry Bain on AJE questions on accounts. Sent Larry a new trial balance after AJEs were posted.

DAC Update

CITY HALL
CITY OF ANGELS PO Box 667, 200 Monte Verda St. Suite B, Angels Camp, CA 95222 P: (209) 736-2181 Nothing to report. DAC attended the Council meeting with frustration due to the City Administrator requiring more detailed information on the scope of work they are proposing.

Museum Update
Museum ticket sales and memberships are becoming a real revenue source. The exhibitions are looking wonderful. Highly recommend Council and public visit as things are constantly changing for the better there.

City of Angels Council Meeting
JUNE 7, 2022 CORRESPONDENCE 10.E
E. News and Notes for the Week of May 23, 2022
___________________________________________________________________

RECOMMENDATION
No action is required.

Administration Update
Attended the UWPA Budget Committee meeting.

Met with Jessica Johnston and Kathy Russel from ACBA. Recommended a point person from ACBA as the staff has been communicating with Debbie directly regarding ACBA, which is confusing and causing lost information. Jessica noted herself as the main point of contact.

Had a lengthy discussion with CalRecycle regarding SB1383. Per conversations with Dave V (CalWaste), there is a rural exemption, but per the meeting with CalRecycle, not ALL items are exempted. Will bring forward a full staff report on June 21.

Attended the CCOG Executive Committee meeting.

Attended a 3-hour DAC meeting. I will work with Tim to figure out how to get these shortened and have more action-oriented agenda items.

Had a legal meeting.

CITY HALL
CITY OF ANGELS PO Box 667, 200 Monte Verda St. Suite B, Angels Camp, CA 95222 P: (209) 736-2181 Staff worked with Springbrook in the morning and afternoon to go over Finance, Utility Billing, and Cash Receipts. This is the first step to testing the application to migrate.

Walked the sewer easement along Angels Creek with the Planning Commission and Amy A.

RFQ review with Amy and Doug for the Building Official/Plan Review, and Code Compliance.

Met with Martin Huberty. CVB will be working on a presentation for the Council after the budget. No additional funding needs for the Museum (other than what we are contributing). Martin is doing an exceptional job getting ticket sales, memberships, and exhibitions growing. It is recommended to have ACBA move to Museum and share resources with CVB to cut costs for them and align with staff on funding/fundraising solutions to make ACBA self-sufficient.

Fire Update
Nothing to report
Police Update
Week 5-20 thru 5-26 96 Calls for Service Misdemeanor Arrests - (1) 5 misdemeanor warrants - (1) misdemeanor domestic assault - (1) misdemeanor warrant - (1) misdemeanor drug paraphernalia and suspended DL - (1) misdemeanor possession of loaded and concealed firearm Felony Arrests - (1) felony warrant arrest - (1) felony warrant arrest - (1) felony assault with a deadly weapon and criminal threats Other: Fair fairly uneventful except an aggravated assault at My Bar on Saturday night around 10 pm (no injuries). PD had a BBQ that was attended by PD staff along with S/O deputies and CHP Chief Ellis attended FBI LEEDS (Law Enforcement Executive Development Seminar) in SLO 5/22-526 Fair weekend Engineering Update
Nothing to report
Public Works Update
Public Works Staff finished meter reads and completed meter rereads at the start of the week. Staff had two sewer plugs, one at 1447 Finnegan and one at 1260 Finnegan. They also had to repair a water service on Live Oak Court and fix a fire hydrant on Hwy 49. Staff also had to rebuild a pump at

CITY HALL
CITY OF ANGELS PO Box 667, 200 Monte Verda St. Suite B, Angels Camp, CA 95222 P: (209) 736-2181 Greenhorn lift station #1. Staff continues weed eating and brush removal and park maintenance. Staff also removed the fair banner and replaced it with the Veterans banner.

Water/Wastewater Update
Staff continues with daily operation and maintenance of the treatment facilities. Staff is currently concentrating on spray field operations and drying of bio-solids. We did have our annual Holman Dam inspection this week, results will be forthcoming.

Building Update
Building and Planning focused on updating the municipal code ordinances. Additional coordination with the City's muni-code publisher will continue the week of May 30th to complete extensive code revisions for online publication and public access. Planning received a list of follow-up/requests for information questions from California State Parks related to the City's Rural Recreation and Tourism Grant proposal for the Lightner Mine/Utica Park Extension. Staff will complete responses the week of May 30th. An online interview as a grant follow-up will be conducted on 6/2/22. Planning updated SB2 grant and consultant invoicing information in conjunction with transitioning finance/grant tracking and finance back to the Finance Dpt. This will be ongoing through the week of May 30th. The Planning Commission walked the City's sewer line along Angels Creek to evaluate the potential for a recommendation to City Council related to an alternative/additional route along Angels Creek for the Angels Creek Trail. The Commission will discuss proceeding with a recommendation at the June 9, 2022, Planning Commission Meeting. At that meeting, a conditional use permit for a Smoke Shop also will be considered. Planning staff will be preparing staff reports for the City Council related to reappointing two Planning Commissioners and the potential use of the Utica Hotel Parking lot for events in support of a local business. Staff participated in reviewing proposals for consulting services for building and code enforcement.

Finance Update
Researched and prepared Debt Service Schedule for the budget. Look at Cost Allocation Plan will work on finalizing the plan this month and prepare allocation percentages to use in the new budget.

Researched and prepared information for Stanley Phu for TDA Audit 2020 & 2021. Sent summaries and backup invoices requested. Continued clean-up on Funds working with Amy Augustine to clean up SB2.

Making JEs correct outages in cash and out-of-balance funds in the following week. Springbrook overview of the Enterprise system. Will begin testing next week of the cloud Enterprise system.

DAC Update

CITY HALL
CITY OF ANGELS PO Box 667, 200 Monte Verda St. Suite B, Angels Camp, CA 95222 P: (209) 736-2181 Nothing to report. The City Administrator compiled all Bylaws from 2012 to 2018. Identified that DAC changed the Board member from Planning Director to Planning Commissioner. Requested they change it back.

Museum Update
Met with Martin about needs for Museum – nothing requested other than the $50,000. Discussed TOT allocation and the need for some to align with DAC, and/or ACBA. Discussed options to consolidate services and share resources.

City of Angels Council Meeting
JUNE 7, 2022 CORRESPONDENCE 10.F
F. Angels Camp Business Association, Letter to City Council for Support, Fiscal Year 2022/2023 Budget
___________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ ANGELS CAMP BUSINESS ASSOCIATION, PO BOX 62, ANGELS CAMP, CA 95222, T: 209 736 1333 June 3, 2022
Angels Camp City Council
P.O. Box 667
Angels Camp, CA 95222
Dear Honorable Mayor Broglio and Council Members,

The Angels Camp Business Association appreciates the opportunity to submit a request to the City of Angels for consideration of financial support and/or waiver of potential city fees as in-kind services.

Your support will assist the on-going promotional efforts of the City of Angels Camp and local businesses in Angels Camp.

For over 60 years ACBA has been intricately involved in the life and commerce of our historic gold rush town. We work to unify and involve the business community in order to promote and support business success and goodwill in the greater Angels Camp area. Our mission is to build an Active Community of Businesses Aligned for a successful Angels Camp.

Our goal is to promote local businesses within the Angels Camp area to encourage residents and visitors to spend their dollars in our City. We achieve this by hosting several activities including:
✓ Evening Business Mixers & Monthly Morning Coffee Talks, Grand Openings, Downtown Beautification Projects & High School Student Scholarships; ✓ Holiday Events – Parade and Open House
✓ Sponsored Events to highlight our businesses and community area attractions include Fresh Fridays Certified Farmers Market, Jr. Frog Jump and Mark Twain Wild West Fest.

As we approach our 2022/2023 budget, we recognize the value of the City waiving multiple fees for ACBA throughout the years. We are asking that the City continue to support ACBA’s endeavors by waiving the City’s fees for such items as hanging banners, signatures for ABC licenses, encroachment permits and staff time to manage road closures, traffic detours, special event permits as well as Utica Park kitchen and park rental fees, etc.

We found that if these fees were imposed upon ACBA this would likely eliminate or modify some events and would reduce the promotional budgets, therefore decreasing our regional outreach. It would increase the asking for sponsorships from our small businesses that are nearly maxed out.

These expenses are estimated to be at least $7,036.81 based on the July 1, 2021 City of Angels Master Fee Schedule. The cost may increase depending on the cost for city services for road closures and fee increases on the 2022 Master Fee Schedule. (See attached list of proposed waived fees by event)
We appreciate the efforts of the City Administration to retain $25,000 of the City’s TOT beginning in 2017 and for the monetary assistance to support the Mark Twain Wild West Fest 2017-2019. In the past, this event has drawn over 6,500 visitors in awe of Mark Twain’s stay in the Mother Lode and Angels Camp and was praised as being one of the best family events in our area. Like many, this event was put on hold during the COVID-19 pandemic. As we prepare to bring this event back postCOVID we face a number of new challenges and requirements and have partnered with the Calaveras Visitor Bureau. We are looking forward to hosting this event at a new location; The Angels Camp Museum. This will be a beneficial partnership in driving visitors not only to our City but also to the beloved Museum. The new location will alleviate the large cost of an all-day road closure. While we are not asking for a monetary donation to this event. We are hoping that a portion of the retained TOT funds can be used to waive the fees relating to the Mark Twain Wild West Fest and all other ACBA events.

ACBA is a completely volunteer ran organization and is comprised of a 15 member board of local business owners, leaders and professionals and represents over 100 business members. Nearly 2,500 volunteer hours go into planning, organizing and working these events. Monies raised from these events help to support future events, our downtown beautification projects, scholarships, and the administrative costs of the organization.

Your support of our efforts will help us to continue our on-going events and promotion of our local businesses to encourage local purchases and to capture tourist dollars, which ultimately enhances the contribution to the City’s revenue stream.

Thank you for your consideration of our request.

Sincerely,
Jessica Johnston
Jessica Johnston
Treasurer
OFFICERS: DIRECTORS:

President- Jeff Johnson, Angels Sewer and Drain Julie Douglas, Crafty Chicks & Co.

Past President- Candy Myers, Ironstone Vineyards Sandy Hegel, Retired Vice-President- Kathy Russell Carla Santiago, Just Because Gifts Secretary- Tammy Dillashaw, Next Home Utica Properties Darrie Galespie, Bank of Stockton Treasurer- Jessica Johnston, Century 21 Sierra Properties Laurie Hughes, Signal Service Jeannette Palma, Retired
Liz Mather, Angels Food & Sierra Hills
Gretel Tiscornia, Pickled Porch & Mingos
Carah Muetterties, Edward Jones Sarah Oskey
ACBA Request To City of Angels
Waiver of Fees Breakdown by Event
Mark Twain Wild West Fest – October 8, 2022
Encroachment Permit Fee - $339.45
ABC Permit Signing - $10.44, Police
Banner Hanging (x2) - $992.22
Hanging of Miners Wash Clotheslines - $496.11
Special Event Permit Application- Currently No Charge
Staff Time– Actual Cost +5% Admin Charge (if necessary) $1,838.22 + Staff Time and 5% (if necessary)
Christmas Activities – December 10, 2022
Open House & Christmas Parade
Encroachment Permit Fee - $339.45
Banner Hanging- $496.11
Special Event Permit Application- Currently No Charge
Staff Time For Road Closure – Actual Cost +5% Admin Charge $835.56 + Staff Time and 5%
Jr. Frog Jump- May 13, 2023
Special Event Permit Application- Currently No Charge
Utica Park Cement Slab Rental $52.22
$52.22
2023 Farmers Market – End of May through September
Kitchen Rental Pre Negotiated Season Rate - $1,000
Banner Hanging (x3) - $1,488.33
ABC Permit Signing (17 @ $10.44/ea) - $177.48
Special Event Permit Application- Currently No Charge
Permit Fee For Signs - $156.67
$2,822.48
Misc. Banners
Angels Camp Salutes Our Veterans x2 - $992.22
Angels Camp Founded 1848 - $496.11
$1,488.33

Angels Camp City CouncilJune 7, 2022

Angels Camp City Council
June 7, 2022