ANNOTATED AGENDA
Antioch City Council
SPECIAL MEETING
Date: Friday, March 11, 2022
Time: 5:15 P.M. – Special Meeting/Study Session
Place: Council Chambers
200 ‘H’ Street
Antioch, CA 94509
City Council meetings are televised live on Comcast channel 24, AT&T U-verse channel 99, or live stream (at www.antiochca.gov). Please see inside cover for detailed Speaker Rules.
PLEASE TURN OFF CELL PHONES BEFORE ENTERING COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
Lamar Thorpe, Mayor Ellie Householder, City Clerk
Michael Barbanica, Mayor Pro Tem (District 2) Lauren Posada, City Treasurer Tamisha Torres-Walker, Council Member District 1
Lori Ogorchock, Council Member District 3 Cornelius Johnson, Interim City Manager Monica E. Wilson, Council Member District 4 Thomas Lloyd Smith, City Attorney
In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and California law, it is the policy of the City of Antioch to offer its public programs, services and meetings in a manner that is readily accessible to everyone, including individuals with disabilities. If you are a person with a disability and require information or materials in an appropriate alternative format; or if you require any other accommodation, please contact the ADA Coordinator at the number or address below at least 72 hours prior to the meeting or when you desire to receive services. Advance notification within this guideline will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. The City’s ADA Coordinator can be reached @ Phone:
(925) 779-6950, and e-mail: [email protected].
ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL -1- MARCH 11, 2022
Notice of Availability of Reports
This agenda is a summary of the actions proposed to be taken by the City Council. For almost every agenda item, materials have been prepared by the City staff for the Council's consideration. These materials include staff reports which explain in detail the item before the Council and the reason for the recommendation. The materials may also include resolutions or ordinances which are proposed to be adopted. Other materials, such as maps and diagrams, may also be included. To be notified when the agenda packets are posted onto our City’s Website, simply click on this link:
https://www.antiochca.gov/notifications/ and enter your e -mail address to subscribe. To view the agenda information, click on the following link: https://www.antiochca.gov/government/agendas-and-minutes/city- council/. Questions may be directed to the staff member who prepared the staff report, or to the City Clerk's Office, who will refer you to the appropriate person.
Notice of Opportunity to Address Council
The public has the opportunity to address the Council on each agenda item. Please see the Speaker Rules on the inside cover of this Agenda for additional information on public participation.
5:15 P.M. ROLL CALL – SPECIAL MEETING/STUDY SESSION – for Council Members – All Present (Council Member District 4 Wilson attended via Zoom Webinar)
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
SM-1. REDISTRICTING: RECEIPT OF PUBLIC INPUT AND SELECTION OF FINAL MAP Received presentation and public comment with Council motion to move forward with “Draft Map A – Modified”; attached, 3/2 (Barbanica, Ogorchock)
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council receive public comment and select the final redistricting map redefining the boundaries of all City Council electoral districts of the City. The selected map will be presented for adoption by resolution at an upcoming City Council meeting.
PUBLIC COMMENTS – Members of the public may comment only on unagendized items.
ADJOURNED SPECIAL MEETING/STUDY SESSION
MOTION TO ADJOURN – The Mayor will make a motion to adjourn the meeting. A second of the motion is required, and then a majority vote is required to adjourn the meeting.
Motioned to adjourn meeting at 6:03 p.m., 3/2 (Barbanica, Ogorchock)
Antioch Redistricting 2021-2022
February 22, 2022
Draft Map A - Modified
ATTACHMENT A
SM-1
Agenda Item #
STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: Special Meeting of March 11, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
SUBMITTED BY: Thomas Lloyd Smith, City Attorney TLS
SUBJECT: Redistricting: Receipt of Public Input and Selection of Final Map
RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council receive public comment and select the final redistricting map redefining the boundaries of all City Council electoral districts of the City. The s elected map will be presented for adoption by resolution at an upcoming City Council meeting.
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
DISCUSSION
The City adopted its current district boundaries based on 2010 census data as required by law. The districts must now be redrawn using the 2020 census data and comply with the FAIR MAPS Act, which was adopted by the California legislature as AB 849 and took effect January 1, 2020.
Under the Act, the City Council shall draw and adopt boundaries using the following criteria in the listed order of priority (Elections Code 21621(c)):
1. Comply with the federal requirements of equal population and the Voting Rights Act
2. Be geographically contiguous
3. Undivided neighborhoods and “communities of interest” (socio- economic geographic areas that should be kept together)
4. Display easily identifiable boundaries
5. Be compact (do not bypass one group of people to get to a more distant group of people)
6. Shall not favor or discriminate against a political party The Final Redistricting Map will comply with the federal requirements of equal population and the Voting Rights Act, and the California Fair Maps Act, in the following manner:
(1) The districts are geographically contiguous. The districts are arrayed in a simple Antioch City Council Report
March 11, 2022 Agenda Item #SM-1 2
and logical form without any islands and minimal intr usions from the area of one district into another;
(2) To the extent practicable, the Final Redistricting Map respects the geographic integrity of local neighborhoods and local communities of interest. The Council heard testimony about what constitute communities of interest in the public eye. (3) The districts are easily identifiable and understandable by residents. The districts in the Final Redistricting Map form a relatively simple pattern. (4) To the extent practicable, the districts are geographi cally compact. Their configurations for the mos t part are compact, simple shapes, with nearby populations included in the same districts.
(5) The districts are balanced in terms of total population and voting age population.
The districts are well with in the one-person/one-vote deviations permitted under federal and state voting rights laws.
(6) The districts conform to concentration of minority voters. The Final Redistricting Map creates one majority/minority Black voting district.
Before adopting a Final Redistricting Map of district boundaries, at least four hearings must be held for the public to provide input about the composition of City Council districts. These hearing requirements include at least: (1) one hearing before any maps are drawn, (2) two hearings after maps are drawn, and (3) one hearing or workshop to be held on a Saturday, Sunday, or after 6 p.m. on a weekday. The City Council redistricting public hearing dates include the following: Tuesday, October 12, 2021, Saturday, October 16, 2021, Tuesday, November 9, 2021, Tuesday, December 14, 2021, Tuesday, January 11, 2022, Tuesday, January 25, 2022 and Tuesday, February 8, 2022, Tuesday, February 22, 2022, Tuesday, March 8, 2022 and Friday, March 11, 2022.
The City Council has scheduled this March 11, 20 22 Special Meeting to consider and designate a Final Redistricting Map for presentation and adoption by resolution at an upcoming City Council meeting.
ATTACHMENTS
A. Draft Map A Modified
B. Antioch Draft Map Demographics
C. All Other Maps
Antioch Redistricting 2021-2022
February 22, 2022
Draft Map A - Modified
ATTACHMENT A
City of Antioch Redistricting:
Draft Map Demographics
February 22, 2022
Draft Map A
District Population CVAP % Deviation
% Latino
CVAP
% Black
CVAP
% Asian
CVAP
% Indigenous
CVAP
% NH White
CVAP
1A 28622 15,694 -0.94% 26.42% 23.94% 5.96% 1.88% 40.59% 2A 28749 18,752 -0.51% 26.53% 19.74% 7.96% 1.10% 42.32% 3A 28628 19,311 -0.92% 24.16% 21.56% 17.91% 0.27% 33.42% 4A 29581 20,083 2.37% 24.70% 26.37% 18.03% 0.31% 26.46% Draft Map B
District Population CVAP % Deviation % Latino
CVAP
% Black
CVAP
% Asian
CVAP
% Indigenous
CVAP
% NH White
CVAP
1B 28622 15694 -0.94% 26.42% 23.94% 5.96% 1.88% 40.59%
2B 28749 18752 -0.51% 26.53% 19.74% 7.96% 1.10% 42.32%
3B 29080 19268 0.64% 23.97% 20.15% 19.53% 0.28% 33.65%
4B 29129 20126 0.81% 24.88% 27.71% 16.48% 0.31% 26.25%
Draft Map C
District Population CVAP % Deviation % Latino
CVAP
% Black
CVAP
% Asian
CVAP
% Indigenous
CVAP
% NH White
CVAP
1C 28622 15,694 -0.94% 26.42% 23.94% 5.96% 1.88% 40.59% 2C 28749 18,752 -0.51% 26.53% 19.74% 7.96% 1.10% 42.32% 3C 29509 20,076 2.12% 23.40% 22.24% 17.69% 0.26% 34.29% 4C 28700 19,318 -0.67% 25.52% 25.86% 18.26% 0.32% 25.27% 1 ATTACHMENT B
Draft Map 34
District Population CVAP % Deviation
% LatinoCVAP
% BlackCVAP
% AsianCVAP
% IndigenousCVAP
% NH WhiteCVAP1 28622 15,694 -0.94% 26.42% 23.94% 5.96% 1.88% 40.59%2 29004 19,172 0.38% 27.83% 19.10% 7.24% 1.11% 42.94%3 28942 19,277 0.16% 22.48% 22.66% 18.53% 0.27% 33.86%4 29012 19,697 0.40% 25.03% 26.05% 18.34% 0.28% 25.09% Draft Map 39
District Population CVAP % Deviation
% LatinoCVAP
% BlackCVAP
% AsianCVAP
% IndigenousCVAP
% NH WhiteCVAP1 28622 15,694 -0.94% 26.42% 23.94% 5.96% 1.88% 40.59%2 29004 19,937 0.38% 27.83% 19.10% 7.24% 1.11% 42.94%3 28942 19,144 0.16% 22.48% 22.66% 18.53% 0.27% 33.86%4 29012 19,065 0.40% 25.03% 26.05% 18.34% 0.28% 25.09% Draft Map 49
District Population CVAP % Deviation
% LatinoCVAP
% BlackCVAP
% AsianCVAP
% IndigenousCVAP
% NH WhiteCVAP1 28622 15,694 -0.94% 26.42% 23.94% 5.96% 1.88% 40.59%2 29242 19,389 1.20% 28.16% 18.63% 7.38% 1.10% 42.88%3 28603 18,960 -1.01% 22.36% 23.66% 17.91% 0.28% 32.94%4 29113 19,797 0.75% 24.76% 25.57% 18.92% 0.28% 25.98% 2 Draft Map 58
District Population CVAP % Deviation % Latino
CVAP
% Black
CVAP
% Asian
CVAP
% Indigenous
CVAP
% NH White
CVAP
1 28622 15,694 -0.94% 26.42% 23.94% 5.96% 1.88% 40.59%
2 28509 18,494 -1.34% 27.52% 19.46% 9.73% 0.89% 39.50%
3 29348 18,393 1.57% 23.44% 22.04% 20.12% 0.29% 31.01%
4 29101 21,259 0.71% 24.46% 25.92% 14.46% 0.49% 31.48%
Draft Map 87
District Population CVAP % Deviation % Latino
CVAP
% Black
CVAP
% Asian
CVAP
% Indigenous
CVAP
% NH White
CVAP
1 28622 15,694 -0.94% 26.42% 23.94% 5.96% 1.88% 40.59%
2 28765 18,677 -0.45% 27.65% 19.38% 9.70% 0.92% 39.43%
3 29272 20,463 1.30% 23.87% 21.80% 13.50% 0.61% 38.25%
4 28921 19,006 0.09% 23.96% 26.74% 21.04% 0.14% 23.72%
Draft Map 91
District Population CVAP % Deviation % Latino
CVAP
% Black
CVAP
% Asian
CVAP
% Indigenous
CVAP
% NH White
CVAP
1 28,622 15,694 -0.94% 26.42% 23.94% 5.96% 1.88% 40.59% 2 28,900 18,773 0.02% 27.60% 19.33% 9.67% 0.94% 39.53%
3 29,119 20,364 0.78% 23.84% 21.78% 13.38% 0.61% 38.40% 4 28,939 19,009 0.15% 24.01% 26.81% 21.21% 0.11% 23.47% 3 Draft Map 95
District Population CVAP % Deviation % Latino
CVAP
% Black
CVAP
% Asian
CVAP
% Indigenous
CVAP
% NH White
CVAP
1 27,919 16,812 -3.38% 30.40% 15.57% 6.32% 2.05% 45.12% 2 27,682 16,979 -4.20% 24.36% 26.08% 9.23% 0.91% 35.83% 3 30,063 19,281 4.04% 24.01% 21.95% 15.92% 0.44% 36.18% 4 29,916 20,768 3.53% 23.45% 27.17% 18.34% 0.16% 26.14% Draft Map 99
District Population CVAP % Deviation % Latino
CVAP
% Black
CVAP
% Asian
CVAP
% Indigenous
CVAP
% NH White
CVAP
1 29,865 18,704 3.36% 28.93% 21.77% 13.84% 0.89% 32.26% 2 27,581 16,886 -4.55% 24.46% 26.17% 9.28% 0.91% 35.79% 3 29,235 18,573 1.18% 23.76% 19.57% 18.30% 0.31% 36.08% 4 28,899 19,677 0.01% 24.35% 24.36% 9.93% 1.22% 37.06%
Draft Map 503
District Population CVAP % Deviation % Latino
CVAP
% Black
CVAP
% Asian
CVAP
% Indigenous
CVAP
% NH White
CVAP
1 28,622 15,694 -0.94% 26.42% 23.94% 5.96% 1.88% 40.59% 2 28,264 18,305 -2.18% 27.55% 19.49% 9.77% 0.85% 39.48% 3 29,246 18,785 1.21% 22.99% 20.54% 17.70% 0.66% 36.65% 4 29,448 21,056 1.91% 24.89% 27.25% 16.43% 0.20% 26.55% 4 Draft Map 508
District Population CVAP % Deviation % Latino
CVAP
% Black
CVAP
% Asian
CVAP
% Indigenous
CVAP
% NH White
CVAP
1 28,622 15,694 -0.94% 26.42% 23.94% 5.96% 1.88% 40.59% 2 28,900 18,773 0.02% 27.60% 19.33% 9.67% 0.94% 39.53%
3 30,293 18,990 4.84% 23.02% 22.17% 20.10% 0.34% 30.97% 4 27,765 20,383 -3.91% 24.77% 26.11% 14.42% 0.40% 31.39% Draft Map 512
District Population CVAP % Deviation % Latino
CVAP
% Black
CVAP
% Asian
CVAP
% Indigenous
CVAP
% NH White
CVAP
1 28,622 15,694 -0.94% 26.42% 23.94% 5.96% 1.88% 40.59% 2 28,900 18,773 0.02% 27.60% 19.33% 9.67% 0.94% 39.53%
3 29,021 19,206 0.44% 24.48% 20.84% 15.98% 0.65% 36.60% 4 29,037 20,167 0.49% 23.39% 27.42% 18.28% 0.10% 26.04% Draft Map 516
District Population CVAP % Deviation % Latino
CVAP
% Black
CVAP
% Asian
CVAP
% Indigenous
CVAP
% NH White
CVAP
1 28,622 15,694 -0.94% 26.42% 23.94% 5.96% 1.88% 40.59% 2 28,900 18,773 0.02% 27.60% 19.33% 9.67% 0.94% 39.53%
3 29,246 18,785 1.21% 22.99% 20.54% 17.70% 0.66% 36.65% 4 28,812 20,588 -0.29% 24.78% 27.56% 16.67% 0.10% 26.21% 5 Draft Map A Modified
District Population CVAP % Deviation % Latino
CVAP
% Black
CVAP
% Asian
CVAP
% Indigenous
CVAP
% NH White
CVAP
1 28,622 15,694 -0.94% 26.42% 23.94% 5.96% 1.88% 40.59% 2 28,938 19,072 0.15% 27.05% 19.71% 9.15% 0.89% 40.72%
3 30,124 20,104 4.25% 24.48% 20.81% 16.96% 0.44% 35.13% 4 27,896 18,970 -3.46% 23.83% 27.51% 18.01% 0.33% 25.68% Draft Map 521
District Population CVAP % Deviation % Latino
CVAP
% Black
CVAP
% Asian
CVAP
% Indigenous
CVAP
% NH White
CVAP
1 28,622 15,694 -0.94% 26.42% 23.94% 5.96% 1.88% 40.59% 2 28,900 18,773 0.02% 27.60% 19.33% 9.67% 0.94% 39.53%
3 29,246 18,785 1.21% 22.99% 20.54% 17.70% 0.66% 36.65% 4 28,812 20,588 -0.29% 24.78% 27.56% 16.67% 0.10% 26.21% *NH White CVAP = Non-Hispanic White Citizen Voting Age Population Racial and ethnic characteristics of the Citizens Voting Age Population (CVAP) are tabulated according to Department of Justice standards. 6 A
ll other maps
Attachment C
City of Antioch Redistricting:Draft Map ANovember 2, 2021 Current Antioch City Council boundaries are shown inblackon this map. Proposed boundaries are showninbrownand filled in with color.Draft Map A only modifies the boundary between District 3 and 4.
Draft Map A: District 1
Draft Map A: District 2
Draft Map A: District 3
Draft Map A: District 4
Antioch Redistricting 2021-2022January 25, 2022
Public Map Submission #01242022508
User Comments: “Moved the homes on south side of JamesDonlon Blvd between Lone TreeWay and Tabora Drive as well as the Contra Loma Reservoir area from District 4 into District 2.Also, moved some homes on south side of Prewett Ranch Dr east of Deer Valley Rd fromDistrict 4 into District 3. Needs more adjustments by Q2 to divide the districts between the olderneighborhoods which should all be in District 3 and the new homes in the Sand Creek areawhich should all be in District 4.” As drawn, this map currently does not have all census blocks assigned (see District 2).
Antioch Redistricting 2021-2022
February 22, 2022
Draft Map 521
Draft Map 521 was based on Public Map Submission #02142022521.
City of Antioch Redistricting:Finalist Draft Map 91January 26, 2022 Draft Map 91 is based on Public Submission #12142021491.
City of Antioch Redistricting:
Draft Map B
November 2, 2021
Current Antioch City Council boundaries are shown in black on this map. Proposed boundaries are shown inbrown and filled in with color.
Draft Map B only modifies the boundary between District 3 and 4.
Draft Map B: District 1
Draft Map B: District 2
Draft Map B: District 3
Draft Map B: District 4
City of Antioch Redistricting:
Draft Map C
November 11, 2021
Current Antioch City Council boundaries are shown in black on this map. Proposed boundaries are shown inbrown and filled in with color.
Draft Map C only modifies the boundary between District 3 and 4.
Draft Map C: District 1
Draft Map C: District 2
Draft Map C: District 3
Draft Map C: District 4
Antioch Redistricting 2021-2022February 14, 2022
Public Map Submission #02082022512
User Comments: “Hopefully, this map will make everyonehappy! It uses common senseboundary lines between districts. It uses Lone Tree Way as the boundary between Districts 2and 3, and Districts 2 and 4. It uses the Delta DeAnza Trail/Contra Costa Canal between LoneTree Way and Deer Valley Road as a boundary between Districts 3 and 4. It combines the MiraVista Hills and all neighborhoods on both sides of James Donlon Blvd in District 2. It uses DeerValley Road then Country Hills Drive between Deer Valley Road and Hillcrest Avenue, thenHillcrest Ave and Lone Tree Way as the boundary between Districts 3 and 4. The greatestpopulation deviation between districts is 1.43% (between Districts 1 and 4). It's clear to eachresident in which district they live, and it doesn't gerrymander to protect incumbents.”
Antioch Redistricting 2021
December 17, 2021
Draft Map 34
Draft Map 34 is based on Public Submission Map #11282021434.
Antioch Redistricting 2021-2022December 17, 2021
Draft Map 39
Draft Map 39 is based on Public Map Submission #1152021439. As drawn, this map does notcurrently meet the contiguity criterion outlined in the FAIR MAPS Act for District 4.
Antioch Redistricting 2021-2022February 14, 2022
Public Map Submission #02082022516
User Comments: “This map keeps all neighborhoods togetherwhile using common senseboundary lines. The boundary line between Districts 2 and 3 is Lone Tree Way. The boundarybetween Districts 2 and 4 is Lone Tree Way and Golf Course Road. The boundary betweenDistricts 3 and 4 is Davison Drive, Deer valley Road and Lone Tree Way. The greatestpopulation deviation between districts is 2.15% (Districts 1 and 3).”
Antioch Redistricting 2021-2022December 17, 2021
Draft Map 49
Draft Map 49 is based on Public Map Submission #11162021449. As drawn, this map does notcurrently meet the contiguity criterion outlined in the FAIR MAPS Act for District 4.
Antioch Redistricting 2021
December 13, 2021
Draft Map 58
Draft Map 58 is based on Public Map Submission #11212021458.
Antioch Redistricting 2021
December 17, 2021
Draft Map 87
Draft Map 87 is based on Public Map Submission #12142021487.
Antioch Redistricting 2021-2022January 11, 2022
Public Map Submission #01102022503
User Comments: None.
As drawn, this map currently does not have all census blocks assigned (see District 2).
Antioch Redistricting 2021-2022
December 17, 2021
Public Map Submission #12142021491
User Comments: None.
As drawn, this map currently does not have all census blocks assigned (see District 2).
Antioch Redistricting 2021-2022January 3, 2022
Public Map Submission #12172021495
User Comments: “It results in three council membersrepresenting the waterfront instead of justone. It also serves to more unify the city between older parts and newer parts instead of dividingit like the current districts do with just one district north of Highway 4. It also combines the MiraVista Hills area south of James Donlon Blvd. with the older areas north of James Donlon Blvd.and the newer area west of Somersville Road which is more of a Community of Interest.” As drawn, this map currently does not have all census blocks assigned (see District 2).
Antioch Redistricting 2021-2022January 3, 2022
Public Map Submission #12202021499
User Comments: “This map gives each council membera portion of both sides of Highway 4and a share of the waterfront using major city streets as boundary lines.” As drawn, this map currently does not have all census blocks assigned (see District 1).