Agenda — Antioch City Council, June 14, 2022 (part 1 of 2)

ANNOTATED AGENDA
Antioch City Council

SPECIAL AND REGULAR MEETING
Including the Antioch City Council acting as
Housing Successor to the Antioch Development Agency

Date: Tuesday, June 14, 2022
Time: 4:30 P.M. – Closed Session
5:30 P.M. – Special Meeting/Study Session
7:00 P.M. – Regular Meeting

Place: Council Chambers
200 ‘H’ Street
Antioch, CA 94509

City Council meetings are televised live on Comcast channel 24, AT&T U-verse channel 99, or live stream (at www.antiochca.gov). Please see inside cover for detailed Speaker Rules.

PLEASE TURN OFF CELL PHONES BEFORE ENTERING COUNCIL CHAMBERS.

Lamar Thorpe, Mayor Ellie Householder, City Clerk
Michael Barbanica, Mayor Pro Tem (District 2) Lauren Posada, City Treasurer Tamisha Torres-Walker, Council Member District 1
Lori Ogorchock, Council Member District 3 Cornelius Johnson, Interim City Manager Monica E. Wilson, Council Member District 4 Thomas Lloyd Smith, City Attorney

In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and California law, it is the policy of the City of Antioch to offer its public programs, services and meetings in a manner that is readily acc essible to everyone, including individuals with disabilities. If you are a person with a disability and require information or materials in an appropriate alternative format; or if you require any other accommodation, please contact the ADA Coordinator at the number or address below at least 72 hours prior to the meeting or when you desire to receive services. Advance notification within this guideline will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. The City’s ADA Coordinator can be reached @ Phone:
(925) 779-6950, and e-mail: [email protected].

SPEAKER RULES

Welcome to a meeting of the Antioch City Council. Your attendance is appreciated. The State Ralph M. Brown Act guarantees the public's right to address the City Council, within the framework of Speaker Rules. Because agendas encompass many business items, Speaker Rules enable the meeting to be efficiently conducted and concluded at a reasonable hour.

The City Council can only take action on items that are listed on the agenda. If you wish to speak about an item not on the agenda, the "Public Comments" section of the agenda is for you. Unagendized comments are provided until no later than 7:30 p.m. when the City Council moves on to agenda items. There is another opportunity for public comments at the end of the meeting.

If you wish to speak, either during "public comments" or during an agenda item, fill out a Speaker Request Form and place in the Speaker Card Tray near the City Clerk . This will enable us to call upon you t o speak. Important: Please i dentify if the comment is for Announcement of Community Events, Public Comment, or a specific Agenda Item Number on your Speaker Request Form. No one may speak more than once on an agenda item or during "public comments." (Please see next page for additional information on public participation.)

Each speaker is l imited to not mo re than three minutes under Public Comments and three minutes on non-public hearing agenda items. During public hearings, each side is entitled to one "main presenter" who may have n ot more than 10 minutes; all other speakers during public hearing items, are entitled to a maximum of 5 minutes. These time limits may be modified depending on the number of speakers, number of items on the agenda , or circumstances. Groups who are here regarding an item may identify themselves by raising their hands at the appropriate time to show support for one of their speakers.

During certain types of hearings, the applicant is allowed to give his or her presentation first.

After all testimony is received, the applicant has an opportunity for rebuttal.

The "Consent Calendar" is a group of items which are determined to be routine. These items are usually considered all at once and approved without further discussion. If you are opposed to action wh ich is recommended for an item on the "Consent Calendar," please submit a Speaker Request Form before the meeting, and place in the Speaker Card Tray near the City Clerk. This will enable the item to be removed from the “Consent Calendar” and call on you to speak.

After having heard from the public, the agenda item will be closed. Deliberations will then be limited to members of the City Council.

If the meeting appears to be going late, the City Council may decide to continue some items until a subsequent meeting. The City Council will try to make this determination around 10:00 p.m. It is the goal to stop discussing agenda items by not later than 11:00 p.m.

The City Council meets regularly on the second and fourth Tuesdays of the month at 7:00 p.m., with Closed Sessio ns often occurring before or after the regular meeting. The City Council also holds adjourned meetings and study sessions on other days.

ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL -1- JUNE 14, 2022

Notice of Availability of Reports
This agenda is a summary of the actions proposed to be taken by the City Council. For almost every agenda item, materials have been prepared by the City staff for the Council's consideration. These materials include staff reports which explain in detail the item before the Council and the reason for the recommendation. The materials may also include resolutions or ordinances which are proposed to be adopted. Other materials, such as maps and diagrams, may also be included. City Council Agendas, including Staff Reports are posted onto our City’s Website 72 hours before each Council Meeting. To be notified when the agenda packets are posted onto our City’s Website, simply click on this link:
https://www.antiochca.gov/notifications/ and enter your e-mail address to subscribe. To view the agenda information, click on the following link: https://www.antiochca.gov/government/agendas-and-minutes/city- council/. Questions may be directed to the staff member who prepared the staff report, or to the City Clerk's Office, who will refer you to the appropriate person.

Notice of Opportunity to Address Council
The public has the opportunity to address the Council on each agenda item. Please see the Speaker Rules on the inside cover of this Agenda for additional information on public participation.

4:30 P.M. ROLL CALL – CLOSED SESSION – for Council Members – Council Members District 1 Torres-Walker, District 3 Ogorchock, District 4 Wilson and Mayor Pro Tem (District 2) Barbanica (Mayor Thorpe – Absent at Roll Call).

Mayor Pro Tem (District 2) Barbanica Opened the meeting.

PUBLIC COMMENTS for Closed Session – None

ADJOURNED TO CLOSED SESSION

MAYOR THORPE ARRIVED DURING CLOSED SESSION AND ATTENDED VIRTUALLY VIA ZOOM WEBINAR.

CLOSED SESSION:

1) CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION – pursuant to California Government Code section 54956.9: Monika Helgemo v. City of Antioch Contra Costa County Superior Court Case No.

C20-00767.

City settled the case in the amount of $250,000, Approved 5/0

2) CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS – pursuant to California Government Code section 54957.6; City designated
representatives: Nickie Mastay, Jazzman Brown, and Jeff Bailey; Employee organizations: Antioch Public Works Association and Antioch Police Sworn Management Association.

No reportable action

ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL -2- JUNE 14, 2022

CLOSED SESSION – Continued

3) CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATONS – pursuant to California Government Code section 54956.8; Property: 4.79-acre property on Delta Fair Blvd., Antioch, CA (APN 074 -080034-7); Agency Negotiation: Cornelius Johnson, Interim City Manager and Thomas Lloyd Smith, City Attorney; Negotiating Parties: Christy Saxton, Interim Director, Health, Housing and Homeless Services, Contra Costa County; Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment.

No reportable action

4) PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION: INTERIM CITY MANAGER. This closed session is authorized pursuant to Government Code section 54957.

No reportable action

5:41 P.M. ROLL CALL – SPECIAL MEETING/STUDY SESSION – for City Council Members – Council Members District 1 Torres-Walker, District 3
Ogorchock, District 4 Wilson , Mayor Pro Tem (District 2) Barbanica and (Mayor Thorpe attended via Zoom Webinar).

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

SPECIAL MEETING/STUDY SESSION

SM-1. CITY OF ANTIOCH 6TH CYCLE HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE
Council provided feedback to staff to bring back policy language on:
(1) anti-tenant harassment, (2) rent control, (3) Just Cause Eviction, plus further discussions on (4) senior housing, and (5) proposed housing areas from DeNova Item was continued to 06/28/22
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council:

1) Provide feedback on the draft Housing Element and

2) Motion to approve and submit the draft Housing Element to the California Department of Housing and Community
Development (HCD) for review.

PUBLIC COMMENT

7:01 P.M. FIVE MINUTE RECESS
7:09 P.M. RETURNED FROM RECESS, All Present

7:38 P.M. MOTIONED TO ADJOURN SPECIAL MEETING/STUDY SESSION

ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL -3- JUNE 14, 2022

7:39 P.M. ROLL CALL – REGULAR MEETING – for Council Members – Council Members District 1 Torres-Walker, District 3 Ogorchock, District 4 Wilson, Mayor Pro Tem (District 2) Barbanica and (Mayor Thorpe attended via Zoom Webinar).

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

CITY ATTORNEY TO REPORT OUT ON CLOSED SESSION

1. INTRODUCTION OF NEW CITY EMPLOYEES

2. PROCLAMATIONS

• Recognizing June 2022 as Pride Month in the City of Antioch • Proclamation Commemorating Juneteenth, 2022
Approved, 5/0
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council approve the proclamations.

3. ANNOUNCEMENTS OF CIVIC AND COMMUNITY EVENTS
• JUNETEENTH COMMUNITY CELEBRATION – June 17 & 18, 2022 • JUNETEENTH COMMUNITY CELEBRATION – June 19, 2022
• SESQUICENTENNIAL 5K RUN – June 25, 2022
• SESQUICENTENNIAL COMMUNITY BIKE RIDE – June 26, 2022

4. ANNOUNCEMENTS OF BOARD AND COMMISSION OPENINGS
➢ SALES TAX CITIZENS’ OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE
➢ CONTRA COSTA MOSQUITO & VECTOR CONTROL BOARD OF TRUSTEES ➢ BOARD OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS

PUBLIC COMMENTS – Members of the public may comment only on unagendized items.

The public may comment on agendized items when they come up on this Agenda.

CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS/COMMUNICATIONS

MAYOR’S COMMENTS

5. PRESENTATIONS – Contra Costa County Fire Protection District – Overview for Community Leaders, presented by Fire Chief Lewis Broschard

– Antioch Police Department – June 2022 Crime and Activity Report, presented by Interim Police Chief Steven Ford

ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL -4- JUNE 14, 2022

6. CONSENT CALENDAR

A. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR APRIL 26, 2022 Approved, 5/0
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council approve the Meeting Minutes.

B. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 10, 2022 Approved, 5/0
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council approve the Meeting Minutes.

C. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MAY 24, 2022 Continued, 5/0
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council continue the Meeting Minutes.

D. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL WARRANTS
Approved, 5/0
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council approve the warrants.

E. REJECTION OF CLAIM: MARY BARKER
Rejected, 5/0
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council reject the claim submitted by Mary Barker.

F. APPROVAL OF TREASURER’S REPORT FOR MARCH 2022
Received and filed, 5/0
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council receive and file the March 2022 Treasurer’s Report.

G. SECOND READING – ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2207-C-S (RELATING

TO THE SALE, POSSESSION, OR PROVISION OF SPECIFIED PRODUCTS BY

TOBACCO RETAILERS OR BUSINESSES) BY PROVIDING A GRACE PERIOD PRIOR TO THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF ORDINANCE NO. 2207-C-S (Introduced on 05/24/2022) Ord No. 2215-C-S adopted, 5/0
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the proposed ordinance amending Ordinance No. 2207-C-S by providing a grace period until December 1, 2022.

ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL -5- JUNE 14, 2022

CONSENT CALENDAR – Continued

H. SECOND READING – ORDINANCE FORMING THE PUBLIC SAFETY AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES DEPARTMENT (Introduced on 05/24/2022)
Ord No. 2216-C-S adopted, 5/0
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the proposed ordinance forming the Public Safety and Community Resources Department.

I. AB 361: RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS NECESSARY TO CONDUCT BROWN ACT

MEETINGS BY TELECONFERENCE FOR THE CITY COUNCIL, BOARDS,

COMMISSIONS, AND COMMITTEES
Reso No. 2022/98 adopted, 5/0
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the resolution authorizing remote teleconference/virtual meetings of the legislative bodies of the City of Antioc h, which includes the City Council, boards, commissions, and committees.

J. STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY
Reso No. 2022/99 adopted, 5/0
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution approving the Statement of Investment Policy.

K. RESOLUTION APPROVING CONSOLIDATED ENGINEER’S REPORT AND DECLARING

INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS FOR THE HILLCREST,

CITYWIDE, DOWNTOWN, ALMONDRIDGE, LONE TREE, AND EAST LONE TREE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS, AND SETTING PUBLIC HEARING (P.W. 500) Reso No. 2022/100 adopted, 5/0
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the Resolution approving the Cons olidated Engineer’s Report and setting June 28, 2022 as the date for the Public Hearing.

ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL -6- JUNE 14, 2022

CONSENT CALENDAR – Continued

L. CONSIDERATION OF BIDS FOR THE PURCHASE OF METER BOX LIDS WITH

CELLULAR NETWORK PROBE HOLES FOR ADVANCED METERING
INFRASTRUCTURE (AMI) CELLULAR METER READING UPGRADE, BID NO. 670-0510- 22A
Reso No. 2022/101 adopted, 5/0
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution:

1) Approving an amendment to increase the Fiscal Year 2022/23 Water Enterprise Fund budget for the purchase of meter box lids with cellular network probe holes for Advanced Metering Infrastructure Cellular Meter Reading Upgrade in the amount of $300,000;

2) Awarding the bid for the supply of concrete meter box lids with cellular network probe holes for the Cellular Network Meter Reading Upgrade program to the lowest, responsive, and
responsible bidder, Pace Supply Co.; and

3) Authorizing the City Manager to approve the purchase of the concrete meter box lids with Pace Supply Co., for an amount not to exceed $300,000 per fiscal year, and a total project cost of $1,500,000 for the entire 5-Year project term starting July 1, 2022 and ending June 30, 2027.

M. ROAD MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION ACCOUNT (P.W. 707) Reso No. 2022/102 adopted, 5/0
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution approving and adopting a list of projects for submittal to the California Transportation Commission for Fiscal Year 2022/23 that are eligible for funding by Senate Bill (SB) 1: the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017.

ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL -7- JUNE 14, 2022

CONSENT CALENDAR – Continued

N. FORMATION OF A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FOR THE PROMENADE SAND CREEK RESIDENTIAL PROJECT (P.W. 697)
Reso No. 2022/103 adopted, 5/0
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution:

1) Authorizing the California Statewide Communities
Development Authority to form a Community Facilities District within the City of Antioch to finance certain public
improvements,

2) Incorporating a Joint Community Facilities Agreement setting forth the terms and conditions of the Community Facilities District financing,

3) Approving an acquisition agreement between the City and the Developer or its assignee; and

4) Authorizing City staff to cooperate with California Statewide Communities Development Authority and its consultants in connection with the Community Facilities District formation and financing.

9:28 P.M. MAYOR THORPE ASKED MAYOR PRO TEM (DISTRICT 2 ) BARBANICA TO PRESIDE OVER AND CONTINUE THE MEETING; MAYOR THORPE LEFT THE MEETING.

PUBLIC HEARING

7. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE PROPOSED FIVE -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2022-2027 (P.W. 150-22)
Reso No. 2022/104 adopted, 4/0
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the resolution:

1) Approving the Five-Year Capital Improvement Program 2022 - 2027;

2) Authorize the City Manager or his designee to amend the Fiscal Year 2022/23 Capital Improvement and Operating
Budgets to include all unspent Fiscal Year 2021/22 Capital Improvement budgets as of June 30, 2022; and

3) Authorize the City Manager or his designee to amend the Fiscal Year 2022/23 Operating Budget for any changes to the previously adopted Fiscal Year 2022/23 Capital Improvement Budget.

ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL -8- JUNE 14, 2022

PUBLIC HEARING – Continued

8. ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE 15 OF CHAPTER 5 OF TITLE 4 OF THE ANTIOCH

MUNICIPAL CODE AND CHANGING THE PRIMA FACIA SPEED LIMIT ON VARIOUS ROADWAY (P.W. 282-3A)
To 06/28/2022 for Adoption, 3/1 (Torres-Walker)
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council introduce, waive the first reading, and read by title only, an Ordinance amending Article 15 of Chapter 5 of Title 4 of the Antioch Municipal Code “Special Speed Zones” in order to change the prima facie speed limit on certain streets.

COUNCIL REGULAR AGENDA

9. FISCAL YEAR 2021-23 MID-YEAR BUDGET
Item was pulled per staff request
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the resolution amending the Fiscal Year 2022 and Fiscal Year 2023 budgets.

10. DECLARATION OF WATER SHORTAGE
Reso No. 2022/105 adopted, 4/0
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution:

1) Declaring a Stage 2 water shortage and implementing the measures identified in the City of Antioch’s Water Shortage Contingency Plan, and

2) Implementing the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board’s Emergency Conservation Regulations Dated May 24, 2022.

ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL -9- JUNE 14, 2022

COUNCIL REGULAR AGENDA – Continued

11. SIDE LETTER AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANTIOCH AND THE ANTIOCH

PUBLIC WORKS EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION AND THE CITY OF ANTIOCH AND THE

ANTIOCH POLICE SWORN MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION OBSERVING THE

JUNETEENTH HOLIDAY

Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution:

Reso No. 2022/106 adopted, 4/0
1) Approving the Side L etter Agreement between the City of Antioch and the Antioch Public Works Employees Association observing the Juneteenth Holiday;

Reso No. 2022/107 adopted, 4/0
2) Approving the Side Letter Agreement between the City of Antioch and the Antioch Police Sworn Management
Association observing the Juneteenth Holiday;

3) Authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute the Side Letter Agreements between the City of Antioch and the Antioch Public Works Employees Association and the City of Antioch and the Antioch Police Sworn Management Association; and

4) Authorizing the City Manager or designee to make any necessary adjustments to the Fiscal Year 2021/22 and Fiscal Year 2022/23 budget to implement the provisions of the Side Letter Agreements.

PUBLIC COMMENT

STAFF COMMUNICATIONS – First Council Meeting in July is not scheduled due to Summer Break. The next regularly scheduled Council Meeting
will be held on July 26, 2022, beginning at 7:00 p.m.

COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS – Council Members report out various activities and any Council Member may place an item for discussion and d irection on a future agenda. Timing determined by Mayor and City Manager – no longer than 6 months.

MOTION TO ADJOURN – After Council Communications and Future Agenda Items, the Mayor will make a motion to adjourn the meeting. A second of the motion is required, and then a majority vote is required to adjourn the meeting.

Motioned to adjourn meeting at 10:08 p.m., 4/0

Antioch City Council Report
June 14, 2022 Agenda Item SM-1

jurisdictions in the State to update the Housing Element of their General Plans every eight years.1

The 6th Cycle Housing Element has a significant amount of new statutory requirements.

These requirements include the obligation for communities to deliberately address, combat, and relieve disparities in housing that have resulted from past patterns of segregation, as well as new public participation and transparency requirements related to draft element updates and revisions. For additional information related to these new requirements see the section below entitled, “New Requirements for the 6 th Cycle Housing Element Update”.

DISCUSSION
Background

Local jurisdictions throughout the State of California must update the Housing Element of their General Plans every eight years .2 The City of Antioch has drafted the 6 th Cycle Housing Element Update of its General Plan for the 2023 -2031 planning period . This Housing Element is required to ensure the City of Antioch adequately plans for the existing and projected housing needs of residents of all income groups.

As part of the Housing Element update process, jurisdictions are required to establish goals, policies, quantified objectives, and implementing programs for the preservation, improvement, and development of housing during the eight -year planning period. This includes the identification of land resources in the community that are eligible for future accommodation of residential development necessary to satisfy the community’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) for the 2023 -2031 planning period, as ascribed by the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) in partnership with the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD).

The following section summarizes the required components of Housing Element Updates per State Law, new requirements included since the 5th cycle Housing Element Update (2015-2023), and penalties for non-compliance with Housing Element Laws. The section also includes a summary of public meetings related to the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update prior to today’s meeting.

Required Components of a Housing Element

Local governments are required to include the i tems below as components within their Housing Elements, pursuant to Government Code Section 65583:

1. Housing Needs Assessment (Chapter 2 and Appendix A): Examine demographic, employment and housing trends and conditions and identify existing and projected

1 California Government Code Sections 65580-65589.8.
2 California Government Code Sections 65580-65589.8.

Antioch City Council Report
June 14, 2022 Agenda Item SM-1

housing needs of the community, with attention to special housing needs (e.g., large families, persons with disabilities).

2. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) (Chapter 3 and Appendix B) :

Analyze and address significant disparities in housing needs and access to opportunity.

3. Constraints Analysis (Chapter 4): Analyze and recommend remedies for existing and potential governmental and nongovernmental barriers to housing development.

4. Housing Resources (Chapter 5): Analyzes resources available for the development, rehabilitation, and preservation of housing.

5. Housing Sites Inventory (Chapter 6 and Appendix C): Identify locations of available sites for housing development or redevelopment to demonstrate there is enough land zoned for housing to meet future need at all income levels.

6. Policies and Programs (Chapter 7): Establish policies and programs to be carried out during the 2023-2031 planning period to fulfill the identified housing needs.

7. Community Engagement (Chapter 8 and Appendix E) : Implement a robust community engagement program that includes reaching out to individuals and families at all economic levels of the community plus historically underrepresented groups.

8. Evaluation of Past Performance (Appendix D): Review the prior Housing Element to measure progress in implementing policies and programs.

The Staff Report prepared for the May 18, 2022 Planning Commission meeting provides an in-depth analysis of the these sections. Please reference that report (Attachment A) as well as the entire draft Housing Element link (Attachment B).

New Requirements for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update

Pursuant to recent State legislation, the two items below are now required as part of the Housing Element Update process . For additional information regarding these requirements, please see the attached Staff Report drafted for the Planning Commission Study Session on May 18, 2022.
• Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH). Assembly Bill (AB) 686 (2018), established new requirements for jurisdictions to affirmatively further fair housing as part of the housing element update process . This means taking “meaningful actions, in addition to combating discrimination, to overcome patterns of segregation and foster inclusive communities”.
• Public Comment on Draft Revisions. AB 215 (2021) requires the City to make the first draft of its Housing Element update available for public comment f or at least 30 days. If any comments are received, the City must take at least 10 additional business days to consider and incorporate public comments into its draft revision before submitting it to HCD. HCD must review the draft and report its written fin dings to the the City within 90 days of receiving the first draft submittal for each Housing Element (or within 60 days of its receipt for a subsequent draft amendment or adoption).

Antioch City Council Report
June 14, 2022 Agenda Item SM-1

Penalties for Noncompliance

Under the 6 th Cycle, jurisdictions face a number of new consequences for not having a certified Housing Element , consistent with State Housing Laws. These include the potential for litigation , loss of local decision -making power regarding certain developments, and ineligibility for certain State funds. For additional information regarding penalties for noncompliance with State Housing Laws, please see the attached Staff Report drafted for the Planning Commission Study Session on May 18, 2022.

Related Elements

In conjunction with the 6th Cycle, State Law requires updates to other portions of the City’s General Plan. These updates include the City’s Safety Element consistent with SB 1035 and SB 379 and Environmental Justice Policies consistent with SB 1000. In Fall 2022, these updates will be separately provided to Council for review. For additional information regarding these updates, see the attached Staff Report drafted for the Planning Commission Study Session held on May 18, 2022.

Summary of Prior Meetings and Study Sessions
Over the course of the last year, the City of Antioch conducted a comprehensive community engagement and outreach strategy to assist in informing the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Process. This strategy included a series of community meetings and study sessions with the Planning Commission and City Council. The meetings and study sessions are summarized below. Feedback received throughout the ongoing community engagement and outreach process has assisted staff and the consulting team in preparing the draft Housing Element Update and related items, as outlined in the tables found in Appendix E of the Housing Element.

Study Sessions
• October 6, 2021 – Planning Commission
o Presentation of the Housing Element, Environmental Hazards Element, and Environmental Justice Requirements
• October 26, 2021 – City Council
o Presentation of the Housing Element, Environmental Hazards Element, and Environmental Justice Requirements
• November 17, 2021 – Planning Commission
o Presentation on Environmental Justice and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as applied to the Housing Element
• May 18, 2022 – PC Study Session
o Presentation of the Draft Housing Element
• June 1, 2022 – PC Study Session
o Presentation of the Draft Housing Element

In addition to these meetings, several community meetings were also held, as discussed under Community Engagement in this staff report.

Antioch City Council Report
June 14, 2022 Agenda Item SM-1

Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA)

An analysis of the City’s housing needs includes the City’s RHNA. According to ABAG’s adopted Final RHNA Plan for the San Francisco Bay Area: 2023 -2031 (Plan) the total RHNA for the San Francisco Bay Area is 441,176 residential units for the 6 th Cycle Housing Element Update 2023-2031 planning period. Antioch’s “fair share” of the region’s housing needs for the 2023-2031 planning period is 3,016 residential units, to be allocated across four income groups as detailed below in Table 1.

Table 1: City of Antioch’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) Income Category
City of Antioch RHNA
Previous Housing
Element Cycle
(2015-2023)
6th Cycle RHNA
(2023-2031)
Very Low
(Less than 50% of AMI) 349 792
Low
(50-80% of AMI) 205 456
Moderate
(80-120% of AMI) 214 493
Above Moderate
(More than 120% of AMI) 680 1,275
Total 1,448 3,016
Source: Final RHNA Plan for the San Francisco Bay Area: 2023-2031 RHNA Buffer

New “no net loss” provisions of SB 166 (2017) require the City of Antioch to ensure an adequate supply of land resources are available for housing development throughout the 2023-2031 planning period. This means if housing sites ide ntified within Antioch’s 6th Cycle Housing Element Update are developed with non-residential uses, lower residential densities, or residential uses at affordability levels higher than anticipated by the Housing Element, Antioch’s Housing Element could be determined to be out of compliance.

HCD guidance recommends a buffer of 15% to 30% in each income category. Consistent with this guidance, the City’s Sites Inventory provides a minimum 20% buffer across all RHNA income groups with an overall buffer of 52%. See Table 2 below.

Housing Sites Inventory

To address 6 th Cycle RHNA Requirements and remain consistent with the “no net loss” provisions, staff and consultants have identified adequate land resources available to the City for the preservation, rehabil itation, and production of housing throughout the City.

These resources are referred to as the City’s Housing Sites Inventory. Consistent with Government Code Section 65583.2(a) , the following land resources were included to accommodate Antioch’s RHNA: vacant sites zoned for residential use, residentially zoned Antioch City Council Report
June 14, 2022 Agenda Item SM-1

sites that are capable of being developed at a higher density, and sites zoned for nonresidential use that can be redeveloped for residential use, and for which the Housing Element includes a program to rezone the site. City staff anticipate starting the rezoning process in tandem with HCD’s review of the Housing Element so that sites will be rezoned before the start of the planning period.

The City’s Housing Sites Inventory is comprised of a total of 182 parcels which are planned to accommodate up to 4,575 housing units during the 2023 -2031 planning period. See Table 2 below for a breakdown of the Inventory by income group and provided RHNA buffer.

Table 2: City of Antioch’s RHNA, Land Resources, and RHNA Buffer Income Category RHNA
(units)
Housing
Element Sites
Inventory
(units)
Buffer
Percentage
Very Low
(Less than 50% of AMI) 792 967 22%
Low
(50-80% of AMI) 456 548 20%
Moderate
(80-120% of AMI) 493 947 92%
Above Moderate
(More than 120% of AMI) 1,275 2,113 66%
Total 3,016 4,575 52%
Source: City of Antioch and Urban Planning Partners, 2022

Sites included within City’s Site Inventory were selected based on a variety of factors, including the existing land uses on and surrounding the site, existing zoning, parcel size, and property owner interest . Sites within the City of Antioch ’s Site Inventory were also selected to increase housing opportunities in high resource neighb orhoods and bring additional resources to traditionally under-resourced neighborhoods, which is consistent with the aim of affirmatively further fair housing (Gov’t Code § 8899.50). 3

Citywide demographic data including indicators such as median income, poverty level, environmental hazards, displacement risk, racial makeup, and access to opportunity were

3 “Affirmatively furthering fair housing” means taking meaningful actions, in addition to combating discrimination, that overcome patterns of segregation and foster inclusive communities free from barriers that restrict access to opportunity based on protected characteristics. Specifically, affirmatively furthering fair housing means taking meaningful actions that, taken together, address significant disparities in housing needs and in access to opportunity, replacing segregated living patterns with truly int egrated and balanced living patterns, transforming racially and ethnically concentrated areas of poverty into areas of opportunity, and fostering and maintaining compliance with civil rights and fair housing laws. The duty to affirmatively further fair housing extends to all of a public agency’s activities and programs relating to housing and community development.” (Gov’t Code § 8899.50(a)(1)) Antioch City Council Report
June 14, 2022 Agenda Item SM-1

analyzed during site selection in order to ensure inequalities were not exacerbated within any part of the City.

For additional information related to the Sites Inventory, including a Sites Inventory Map, please see the attached Staff Report drafted for the Planning Commission Study Session held on May 18, 2022. For detailed information on specific Housing Sites see Chap ter 6 of the attached draft Housing Element.

Additional Resources to Accommodate RHNA Requirements
In addition to the development of up to 4,575 multi-family residential units to be accommodated within the sites inventory as described above , the City is able to also account for both pending/pipeline projects and Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) which are anticipated to be developed during the 6 th cycle planning period, towards RHNA requirements. Accordingly, the City has accounted for 394 residential uni ts which are planned to be developed as part of the planned AMCAL project within the City, as well as a total of 136 Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), or approximately 17 ADUs per year, to be built during the eight -year planning period. This figure is based on average ADU production rates over recent years and further provides a RHNA buffer, consistent with State recommendations across all income groups. Table 3 shows the total development potential from the pipeline units, ADUs, and development on sites in the sites inventory.

Table 3: City of Antioch Housing Sites Inventory
Site Category
Very
Low
Income
Low
Income
Moderate
Income
Above
Moderate
Income
Total
2023-2031 RHNA 792 456 493 1,275 3,016
Pipeline Units
(AMCAL project) 91 299 0 4 394
Projected ADUs 41 41 41 13 136
Future Multi-Family
Development on Sites
Identified in Sites Inventory
967 548 947 2,113 4,575
Total 1,099 888 988 2,130 5,105
Buffer Percentage 39% 95% 100% 67% 69%
Source: City of Antioch and Urban Planning Partners, 2022 Policies and Programs

The draft Housing Element also includes a set of goals, policies, and implementing programs intended to promote the preservation, rehabilitation, and production of housing throughout the City of Antioch. The City’s Goals are organized into the following five (5) topic areas, each of which include several policies and implementing programs:

1. Improve and Conserve Existing Housing Stock

2. Assist in the Development of Housing

3. Special Needs Housing
Antioch City Council Report
June 14, 2022 Agenda Item SM-1

4. Elimination of Government Constraints

5. Fair Housing

The complete set of Housing goals, policies, and programs can be found in Chapter 7 of the attached draft Housing Element. Goals, policies, and programs related to Fair Housing are also included within Chapter 3, and Appendix B of the draft Housing Element.

Community Engagement
Consistent with State Law, the City of Antioch has conducted ongoing community outreach efforts throughout the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update process. These efforts, inclusive of Planning Com mission and City Council Meetings held prior to today, are summarized below and discussed in Chapter 8 and Appendix E of the Housing Element Update.

Community Meetings
• February 17, 2022 – Community Meeting No. 1
o The meeting was held virtually and utilize d breakout rooms and a live poll to gather community feedback. A presentation was given for context, including an overview of housing needs data and the draft sites inventory.

The presentation was followed by a breakout room discussion to receive feedback on housing needs and the sites inventory.
o Key Topics Discussed: Cost burdened experienced by renters, need for affordable housing, importance of locating housing near services and transit, questions about how to address Antioch’s car dependency and infrastructure needs, and the importance of conducting an assessment of fair housing and using it to inform the location of sites.

• April 13, 2022 – Community Meeting No. 2
o The meeting was held virtually and utilized live polls and discussion to gather community feedback. The presentation contained information about the contents and goals of the Housing Element update, alongside an update on findings related to environmental justice ( EJ). The presentation was followed by a discussion.
o Key Topics Discussed: Providing various types of housing, importance of locating future housing near services, need for programs around tenant rights, importance of addressing governmental constr aints to development of transitional housing, and the desire to increase homeownership opportunities.

• May 4, 2022 – Community Meeting No. 3 (Bilingual)
o This bilingual English -Spanish virtual community meeting was held in partnership with First Five Contra Costa Children and Families Commission.

First Five is a trusted community organization in the Latinx community and has been active in identifying housing issues for its members and advocating for solutions. There was a brief presentation on the contents and Antioch City Council Report
June 14, 2022 Agenda Item SM-1

goals of the Housing Element update and findings related to environmental justice. After the presentation, there was a discussion. o Key Topics Discussed: Experiences with unsafe and inadequate housing and landlord harassment; desire for greater tenant p rotections and legal services; desire for more opportunities to homeownership; importance of considering quality of parks and clean air in housing and EJ policies; concerns about investment properties and rising rents.

Stakeholder Interviews and Focus Groups
• October 20, 2021 – Independent Living Resources
• October 25, 2021 – Antioch First 5 Center
• October 25, 2021 – ECHO Fair Housing
• December 3, 2021 – AMCAL Multi-Housing
• December 13, 2021 – Community-Based Organizations Focus Group o ECHO Fair Housing
o Shelter Inc
o Contra Costa Senior Legal Services
o Bay Area Legal Aid
o Habitat for Humanity East Bay/Silicon Valley
o Saint Vincent de Paul Most Holy Rosary Conference
o East Bay Housing Organizations
• December 22, 2021 – CityVentures
• February 19, 2022 – Spanish Speakers Focus Group
• April 5, 2022 – Contra Costa Health Services
• April 19, 2022 – Antioch First 5 Center
• April 25, 2022 – Contra Costa Health Services

PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW
The City of Antioch’s Planning Commission held two (2) Study Sessions related to review and discussion of the attached draft Housing Element.
• May 18, 2022 – Study Session No. 1
o Several members of the public belonging to First 5’s East County Regional Group offered public comment in response to the draft Housing Elem ent.

Members agreed with the main components of the draft Element but expressed the desire for additional tenant protections in the draft Housing Element. Members expressed concerns including landlord harassment , cost-burden, and high rates of eviction/di splacement. Members also requested tenant protections including rent control, an anti-harassment ordinance, and a “just cause” Ordinance.
o Several commissioners recommended the City study rent control, “just cause” ordinances, and “anti-harassment” ordinances.
o Other commissioners expressed that rent control is not a long-term solution to the City’s housing issues, but a shorter-term “stop-gap” measure. It was also suggested that a cost -benefit analysis of the creation of a “right to counsel” program for city residents facing fair housing issues be considered.

Antioch City Council Report
June 14, 2022 Agenda Item SM-1

• June 1, 2022 – Study Session No. 2
o No members of the public spoke at this meeting.
o Commissioners recommended that additional language be added to the discussion of solar to mention the benefits, including how solar can reduce operational costs for occupants.
o A concern was raised about Site 162 at 2721 Empire Ave being rezoned to R-35 due to it b eing located between large retail buildings. Other commissioners felt the location was appropriate as it would allow future residents to walk to nearby commercial uses. It was noted that the design of the development would be key to fitting into the area. o Support for rent control, tenant protections and just cause evictions w ere reiterated.
o It was noted that fees in Antioch are considerably lower than in adjacent communities and the City may want to reevaluate its fees. o It was suggested that a program be considered to allow renters the first right to purchase their unit if it is offered for sale.
o It was also suggested the City explore and educate landlords about programs that offer rental deposit assistance. A business that lets tenants pay a monthly insurance fee instead of providing first and last month’s rent and a security deposit was cited as an example.
o The consideration and feasibility of a basic income program was discussed. o Down payment assistance programs were identified for consideration.

NEXT STEPS

Staff have consolidated comments received from the public and the Planning Commission in response to the Draft Housing Element Update and incorporated them into the revised draft. Following the presentation of the revised draft to the City Council on June 14, 2022, the document will be sent to the State (HCD) for initial review. Initial review comments from HCD are anticipated in mid-September 2022. Once HCD comments are received, City staff and the consultant team will update the draft based on HCD’s comment s and then seek formal adoption of the Housing Element and associated Environmental Impact Report (EIR) from Planning Commission and City Council.

During early summer, staff and the consulting team will begin the rezoning process and continue to work on drafting EJ goals, polici es, and programs to be incorporated in the General Plan, as well as mandatory updates to the Environmental Hazards Element. The program EIR will also be underway, and the draft EIR is scheduled for release in late Summer 2022. The entire package of draft e lements, rezoning, and EIR will go to Planning Commission and City Council in Fall 2022.

Antioch City Council Report
June 14, 2022 Agenda Item SM-1

EIR

Pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City’s action to submit the Draft 2023-2031 Housing Element to HCD for review is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15262, as the project involves only feasibility or planning studies for possible future actions which have not been approved or adopted. However, the City of Antioch will prepare an EIR, consistent with CEQA, for the Draft 2023– 2031 Housing Element Update.

LETTERS RECEIVED

As part of the Council discussion, staff received two letters on behalf of Denovo Home s.

Attachment C is a request to include a 17 acre property at north of Vineyard Drive and east of Viera Avenue as a Housing Element Opportunity Site.

Attachment D is a request to include approximately 6 acres at Slatten Ranch at Empire Way and Wicklow Avenue as a Housing Element Opportunity Site.

ATTACHMENTS

Attachment A: Staff Report: Planning Commission Study Session 5-18-22 Attachment B: City of Antioch Draft 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Housing Element Link:
https://www.antiochca.gov/fc/community-development/planning/housing- element/AntiochHousingElement_PubReviewDraft-App_final_reduced.pdf Attachment C: Viera Letter
Attachment D: Slatten Ranch Letter
8-1
05-18- 22
TO: Antioch Planning Commission
SUBMI
TTED BY: Curtis Banks, Project Director
Meredith Rupp, Project Manager
Urban Planning Partners Inc.

REVIEW
ED Anne Hersch, Planning Manager
SUBJE
CT: City of Antioch 6th Cycle Housing Element Update
DATE: M
ay 18, 2022

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staf
f recommends that the Planning Commission receive the presentation on the Housing Element update and provide feedback to staff and the consultant. This is a study session and no action will be take.

EXECUTIVE SUMMA RY
This s
taff report provides a summary of the City of Antioch 6th Cycle Housing Element Update for the 2023- 2031 planning period (Housing Element), pursuant to California Government Code Sections 65580-65589.8, which require all local jurisdictions i n the State to update the Housing Element of their General Plans every eight years. With a significant amount of new statutory requirements, the 6th Cycle Housing Element is much different than prior cycles. These requirements include the obligation for communities to deliberately address, combat, and relieve disparities in housing that have resulted from past patterns of segregation, as well as new public participation and transparency requirements related to draft element updates and revisions. For additional information related to these new requirements see the “New Requirements for the 6 th
Cycle Housing Element Update” Section below.

The purpo
se of this report is to provide the Planning Commission with an update on the draft Housing Element and receive comments and feedback from the Planning Commission to be incorporated into the Housing Element for review by the City Council. Following City Council review, the Draft Housing Element Update will be submitted to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) for review and certification. Consistent with statutory requirements, the Housing Element must be certified by HCD and adopted by the City by January 2023 (although a 120-day grace period is allowed).

ATTACHMENT A
A1
Page | 2

DISCUSSION
Background

Pursuant to California Government Code Sections 65580 -65589.8 which require local jurisdictions throughout the State to update the Housing Element of their General Plans every eight years, the City of Antioch has drafted the 6
th Cycle Housing Element Update of its General
Plan for the 2023-2031 planning period. This Housing Element is required to ensure the City of Antioch adequately plans for the existing and projected housing needs of residents of all income groups.

As part of the Housing Element update pr ocess, jurisdictions are required to establish goals, policies, quantified objectives, and implementing programs for the preservation, improvement, and development of housing during the eight-year planning period. This includes the identification of land r esources in the community that are eligible for future accommodation of residential development necessary to satisfy the community’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) for the 2023- 2031 planning period, as ascribed by the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) in partnership with the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD).

The following section summarizes the required components of Housing Element Updates per State Law, new requirements included since the 5th cycle Housing Element Update (2015-2023), and penalties for non -compliance with Housing Element Laws. The section also includes a summary of public meetings related to the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update prior to today’s meeting.

Required Components of a Housing Element

Pursuant to Government Code Section 65583, local governments are required to include the below items as components within their Housing Elements, and subsequent updates thereto.

1. Housing Needs Assessment: Examine demographic, employment and housing trends and conditions and identify existing and projected housing needs of the community, with attention paid to special housing needs (e.g., large families, persons with disabilities).

2. Evaluation of Past Performance: Review the prior Housing Element to measure progress in implementing policies and programs.

3. Housing Sites Inventory: Identify locations of available sites for housing development or redevelopment to demonstrate there is enough land zoned for housing to meet future need at all income levels.

4. Community Engagement : Implement a robust community engagement program that includes reaching out to individuals and families at all economic levels of the community plus historically underrepresented groups.

5. Constraints Analysis : Analyze and recommend remedies for existing and potential governmental and nongovernmental barriers to housing development.

6. Policies and Programs: Establish policies and programs to be carried out during the 2023- 2031 planning period to fulfill the identified housing needs.

7. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH): Analyze and address significant disparities in housing needs and access to opportunity, as described further below.

A2
Page | 3

New Requirements for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Pursuant to recent State legislation, the following items are now required as part of the Housing Element Update process:
• Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH). Assembly Bill (AB) 686, passed in 2018, created new requirements for jurisdictions to affirmatively further fair housing. According to AB 686, affirmatively furthering fair housing means to take “meaningful actions, in addition to combating discrimination, that overcome patterns of segregation and foster inclusive communities free from barriers that restrict access to opportunity based on protected characteristics” and is Federally mandated by the 1968 Fair Housing Act. The four main goals are to:
o Address significant disparities in housing needs and in access to opportunity o Replace segregated living patterns with truly integrated and balanced living patterns o Transform racially and ethnically concentrated areas of poverty into areas of opportunity o Foster and maintain compliance with civil rights and fair housing laws • Public Comment on Draft Revisions. AB 215 (2021), requires local governments to make the first draft of their Housing Element update available for public comment for at least 30 days. Further, if any comments are received, a local government must take at least 10 additional business days to consider and incorporate public comments into the draft revision before submitting to HCD. HCD must review the draft and report its written findings to the planning agency within 90 days of receiving the first draft submittal for each Housing Element (or within 60 days of its receipt for a subsequent draft amendment or adoption).

Penalties for Noncompliance

Under the 6 th Cycle, jurisdictions face several new consequences for not having a certified Housing Element. Under legislation enacted in recent years, if a city does not comply with State housing law, it can be brought under litigation– by individuals, developers, third parties or the State. In addition to facing significant fines, a court may limit local land use decision- making authority until the jurisdiction brings its Housing Element into compliance. Additionally, local governments may lose the right to deny certain projects.

C
onversely, an HCD-certified Housing Element makes cities eligible for numerous sources of funding, such as Local Housing Allocations, Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities Grants, Senate Bill (SB) 1 Planning Grants, CalHOME Program Grants, Infill Infrastructure Grants, Pro-Housing Design funding, Local Housing Trust Funds, Regional Transportation Funds (such as MTC’s OneBayArea Grants).

Related Elements

• Environmental Justice. In 2016, SB 1000 amended Government Code § 65302 to require cities to adopt an Environmental Justice (EJ) Element or EJ-related goals, policies, and objectives integrated in other General Plan Elements, that identifies “disadvantaged communities” within the area covered by the General Plan. “Disadvantaged communities” are defined as areas identified by the California Environmental Protection Agency Pursuant to Section 39711 of the Health and Safety Code or a low -income area that is disproportionately affected by environmental pollution and other hazards that can lead to negative health effects, exposure, or environmental degradation. This law is triggered if the city is updating two or more elements concurrently on or after January 1, 2018.

A3
Page | 4

• Safety Element. Cities must review and update their Safety Element to meet certain requirements concurrently with the Housing Element update. The Safety Element must be reviewed and updated to address wildfire, seismic, geologic and flood risks. Climate adaptation and resiliency strategies are also considered. Antioch’s Safety Element is called the Environmental Hazards Element.

• SB 1035 and SB 379. Require all cities to address climate change adaptation and resilience in their General Plan Safety Element. SB 379 is triggered by the next update of a jurisdiction’s local hazard mitigation plan (updated every five years) or before 1/1/2022, whichever is first. SB 1035 built off SB 379, requiring the Safety Element be updated every eight years upon the next Housing Element update.

• SB 1241. Applies to communities with very high fire hazard severity or unincorporated communities in state responsibility areas. Communities subject to SB 1241 need to ensure consistency between the housing and safety elements to address fire risk. AB 2911 strengthened the local very high fire hazard severity zone designation. There are no very high fire hazard severity zones in Antioch.

Summary of Prior Meetings and Study Sessions

Over the course of the last year, the City of Antioch has conducted a comprehensive community engagement and outreach strategy as required by State Law to assist in informing the 6 th Cycle
Housing Element Update Process. This strategy has included a series of community meetings and study sessions with the Planning Commission and City Council. These meetings and study sessions are summarized below. Feedback received throughout the ongoing community engagement and outreach process has assisted staff and the consulting team in preparing the draft Housing Element Update and related items, as outlined in the tables found in Appendix E of the Housing Element.

Study Sessions
• October 6, 2021 – Planning Commission
o Presentation on Housing Element, Environmental Hazards Element, and Environmental Justice Requirements
• October 26, 2021 – City Council
o Presentation on Housing Element, Environmental Hazards Element, and Environmental Justice Requirements
• November 17, 2021 – Planning Commission
o Presentation on Environmental Justice and Housing Element’s CEQA

In addition to these meetings, several community meetings were also held, as discussed under Community Engagement in this staff report.

DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT
The following section summarizes the contents of the City of Antioch’s Draft Housing Element.

Housing Needs Assessment
The City’s analysis of housing needs includes an assessment of detailed demographic data, including population age, size, and ethnicity; household characteristics; overpayment trends; housing stock conditions; units in need of replacement or rehabilitation; and needs of special needs populations including the elderly, persons with disabilities, unhoused persons, extremely A4
Page | 5

low-income households, and farmworkers. Utilizing the Housing Needs Data Report provided by ABAG, the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update outlines the housing needs for the City of Antioch.

The Needs Assessment is summarized in Chapter 2 and more detailed information is provided in Appendix A.

Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA)

In January of 2022, HCD approved ABAG’s adopted Final RHNA Plan for the San Francisco Bay Area: 2023 -2031 (Plan) which establishes a total RHNA for the San Francisco Bay Area of 441,176 residential units for the 6
th Cycle Housing Element Update 2023-2031 planning period.

ABAG’s Plan further distributes this RHNA across the Bay Area’s nine counties and 101 cities based on demographic population data received from the California Department of Finance (DOF). Local jurisdictions must then utilize their ascribed RHNA to update their Housi ng Elements, inclusive of identifying eligible land resources to accommodate this RHNA. See the Sites Inventory Section below.

RHNA requirements are organized into four affordability categories, established according to the Area Median Income (AMI) of a geography. These categories include very low-income residential units, which are affordable to households earning less than 50% of AMI; low -income residential units, which are affordable to households earning between 50% and 80% of AMI; moderate income residential units, which are affordable to households earning between 80% and 120%; and above moderate- income residential units, which are affordable to households earning upwards of 120% of AMI. Antioch’s 2023 -2031 RHNA allocation compared to its previous allocation is detailed below in Table 1.

Table 1: City of Antioch’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA)

Income Category
City of Antioch RHNA
Previous Housing Element
Cycle
(2015-2023)
6th Cycle RHNA
(2023-2031)
Very Low
(Less than 50% of AMI)
349 792
Low
(50-80% of AMI)
205 456
Moderate
(80-120% of AMI)
214 493
Above Moderate
(More than 120% of AMI)
680 1,275
Total 1,448 3,016
Source: Final RHNA Plan for the San Francisco Bay Area: 2023-2031 RHNA Buffer

New “no net loss” provisions of SB 166 (2017) require the City of Antioch to ensure an adequate supply of land resources to be made available for housing development throughout the duration of the 2023-2031 planning period. This means if housing sites identified within Antioch’s 6th Cycle Housing Element Update are developed with non-residential uses, lower residential densities, or residential uses at affordability levels higher than anticipated by the Housing Element, Antioch’s Housing Element could be determined to be out of compliance. HCD recommends a buffer of 15% to 30% in each income category.

A5
Page | 6

Constraints Analysis

In addition to analyzing the existing and projected housing needs of Antioch, the Housing Element Update must also identify and analyze potential and actual governmental and nongovernmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, or development of housing for all income in the community, regardless of protected class. Chapter 4 of the Housing Element identifies governmental and non-governmental constraints.

Housing Resources & Sites Inventory
Chapter 5 identifies resources available to the community for the preservation, rehabilitation, and production of housing throughout the community. This includes programmatic and financial resources, such as those offered locally or through State or federal partners.

Chapter 6 outlines the land resources within Antioch that were identified as eligible for accommodation of the City’s RHNA. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65583.2(a) the following land resources were included to accommodate Antioch’s RHNA: vacant sites zoned for residential use, residentially zoned sites that are capable of being developed at a higher density, and sites zoned for nonresidential use that can be redeveloped for residential use, and for which the Housing Element includes a program to rezone the site. City staff anticipate starting the rezoning process in tandem with HCD’s review of the Housing Element so that sites will be rezoned before the start of the planning period.

A total of 182 parcels are identified to accommodate up to 4,575 housing units, providing a buffer of approximately 20% for the lower-income units. See Table 2 and the map of sites in Attachment A. Sites were selected based on a variety of factors, including the existing land uses on and surrounding the site, existing zoning, parcel size, property owner interest, and AFFH considerations (e.g., avoidance of concentrating low -income units in one area, avoidance of placing low-income units in EJ areas). The majority of sites (55%) identified in the inventory are vacant sites. New state requirements (AB 1397, 2017) require substantial analysis to demonstrate that nonvacant sites could realistically redevelop during the planning period, including an analysis of the nonvacant site’s existing use as an impediment to future development, the jurisdiction’s past experience converting existing uses to higher density residential, and market trends and conditions. The nonvacant sites included in the inventory all have a land to improvement ratio of less than 1.0, indicating underutilization and the potential for redevelopment and/or have interest from the property owner.

In addition to the development of multi -family units planned for in the sites inventory, the City anticipates a total of 136 Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), or approximately 17 ADUs per year, to be built during the eight-year planning period. This figure is based on average ADU production rates over recent years and further provides a RHNA buffer, consistent with State recommendations. The completion of the AMCAL project will also count towards the 2023- 2031 RHNA because it is anticipated that the Certificate of Occupancy will be issued after the 6th Cycle planning period begins. Table 3 shows the total development potential from the pipeline units, ADUs, and development on sites in the sites inventory.

Table 3: City of Antioch Housing Sites Inventory
Site Category Very Low
Income
Low
Income
Moderate
Income
Above
Moderate
Income
Total
2023-2031 RHNA 792 456 493 1,275 3,016
Pipeline Units
(AMCAL project) 91 299 0 4 394
Projected ADUs 41 41 41 13 136
Future Multi-Family
Development on Sites
Identified in Sites Inventory
967 548 947 2,113 4,575
Total 1,099 888 988 2,130 5,105
Buffer Percentage 39% 95% 100% 67% 69%
Source: City of Antioch and Urban Planning Partners, 2022 Policies and Programs

The Housing Element Update includes a set of goals, policies, and implementing programs intended to promote the preservation, rehabilitation, and production of housing throughout the City of Antioch. Goals are long- range, broad, and comprehensive targets that describe future outcomes the City desires. A policy is a specific instructional guideline that seeks to promote goals. Together, goals and policies are implemented through a series of programs that identify specific, quantifiable actions the City will undertake during the 6th Cycle planning period. The State requires clear metrics and milestones be established for each implementation program.

Goals, policies, and programs are found in Chapter 7 of the Housing Element. Identified below are the 5 goals of the Housing Element. Fair housing goals and actions are also included in the Fair Housing Action Plan found in Chapter 3.

1. Improve and Conserve Existing Housing Stock

2. Assist in the Development of Housing

3. Special Needs Housing

4. Elimination of Government Constraints

5. Fair Housing
AFFH

AFFF requirements are intended to address racial inequalities seen today throughout the Bay Area which developed through historical policies and practices enacted at federal, State, regional, and local levels and across the public and private sectors. Though many of these explicit forms of historical discrimination have been outlawed, the results of these systems have left a lasting A7
Page | 8

imprint on both the Bay Area region and Antioch. Racially explicit practices (e.g., racial covenants) which excluded persons of color from predominately White neighborhoods have been replaced with race-neutral land use policies that continue to exclude these same groups. Furthermore, rapidly increasing housing costs have deepened racial and economic disparity and segregation, displacing many low income and people of color to the peripheries of the region or out of the Bay Area all together.

Accordingly, AB 686 requires the City of Antioch to incorporate f air housing into its 6 th Cycle
Housing Element Update to increase housing opportunities in high resource neighborhoods and bring additional resources to traditionally under -resourced neighborhoods. These fair housing requirements were considered during the site selection process for the site inventory.

Demographics and indicators such as median income, poverty level, environmental hazards, displacement risk, racial makeup, and access to opportunity were analyzed during site selection in order to ensure inequalities were not exacerbated within the city. AFFH is discussed in Chapter 3 and more thoroughly analyzed in Appendix B.

Evaluation of Past Progress

Pursuant to State Law, the Housing Element must review the implementation status of Goals, Policies and Programs from the City of Antioch’s 5
th Cycle Housing Element. This evaluation can
be found in Appendix D of the Housing Element.

Community Engagement

Consistent with State Law, the City of Antioch has conducted ongoing community outreach efforts throughout the 6
th Cycle Housing Element Update process. These efforts, inclusive of Planning Commission and City Council Meetings held prior to today, are summarized below and discussed in Chapter 8 and Appendix E of the Housing Element Update.

Com
munity Meeti ngs

• February 17, 2022 – Community Meeting #1
o The meeting was held virtually and utilized breakout rooms and a live poll to gather community feedback. A presentation was given for context, including an overview of housing needs data and the draft sites inventory. The presentation was followed by a breakout room discussion to receive feedback on housing needs and the sites inventory.
o Key Topics Discussed: Cost burdened experienced by renters, need for affordable housing, importance of locating housing near services and transit, questions about how to address Antioch’s car dependency and infrastructure needs, and the importance of conducting an assessment of fair housing and using it to inform the location of sites.

• April 13, 2022 – Community Meeting #2
o The meeting was held virtually and utilized live polls and discussion to gather community feedback. The presentation contained information about the contents and goals of the Housing Element update, alongside an update on findings related to EJ. The presentation was followed by a discussion.
o Key Topics Discussed: Providing various types of housing, importance of locating future housing near services, need for programs around tenant rights, importance A8
Page | 9

of addressing governmental constraints to development of transitional housing, and the desire to increase homeownership opportunities.

• May 4, 2022 – Community Meeting #3 (Bilingual)
o This bilingual English-Spanish virtual community meeting was held in partnership with First Five. First Five is a trusted community organization in the Latinx community and has been active in identifying housing issues for its members and advocating for solutions. There was a brief presentation on the contents and goals of the Housing Element update and findings related to environmental justice. After the presentation, there was a discussion.
o Key Topics Discussed: Experiences with unsafe and inadequate housing and landlord harassment; desire for greater tenant protections and legal services; desire for more opportunities to homeownership; importance of considering quality of parks and clean air in housing and EJ policies; concerns about investment properties and rising rents.

NEXT STEPS

At the end of the 30-day comment period, staff will consolidate comments received by the public and Planning Commission in response to the Draft Housing Element Update and incorporate them into the revised draft. The revised Draft will be presented to City Council on June 14 and then be sent to the State (HCD) for initial review. Initial review comments from HCD are anticipated in mid-September 2022. Once HCD comments are received, Staff and consultant team will update the draft based on HCD’s comment and then seek formal adoption of the Housing Element and associated Environmental Impact Report (EIR) from Planning Commission and City Council.

During the spring and early summer, staff and the consulting team will begin the rezoning process and continue to work on drafting EJ goals, policies, and programs to be incorporated in the General Plan, as well as mandatory updates to the Environmental Hazards Element. The program EIR will also be underway, and the draft EIR is scheduled for release in late Summer 2022. The entire package of draft elements, rezoning, and EIR will go to Planning Commission and City Council in Fall 2022.

A9
Page | 10

EIR

A Notice of Preparation for the EIR associated with Antioch’s 6th Cycle Housing Element Update was posted on November 8, 2021. The scoping session for the EIR was on November 17, 2021 before the Planning Commission. Comments received during the 30- day scoping period will be considered in the Program EIR Analysis.

ATTACHMENTS

Attachment A: Sites Inventory
A10

ATTACHMENT A

SITES INVENTORY
(SEPARATE PAGE)
A11

AUTO CENTER
DR
SOM

ERSVILLERD
10TH ST
18TH ST

PUTNAM ST
L ST

BUCHANANRD
4th St
CO
NTRA
LO
M
A
BLVD

WILBUR AVE

DAVISON DR

LAURELRD

EMPIRE AVE
A ST

GENTRYTOW
N
DR
G ST

DELTA FA IRBLVD

LONE TREE WAY

HILLCREST AVE
D

EERVALLEY
RD
0 4,100 8,2002,050
Feet
N

1. Move frame to project location

2. Set scale to preferred scale

3. Save preferred scale to bookmarks with specific details

4. Turn on / Add layers as appropriate

5. If using aerial, decide between ESRI or Bing (which ever is better)

6. Once set, convert street labels to annotations, and adjust position accordingly (or do in AI)

7. Export as Adobe Illustrator file

AUTO CENTER
DR
SOM

ERSVILLERD
10TH ST
18TH ST

PUTNAM ST
L ST

BUCHANANRD
4th St
CO
NTRA
LO
M
A
BLVD

WILBUR AVE

JAMES DONLON BLVD

DAVISON DR

LAURELRD

EMPIRE AVE
A ST
G
ENTRY
TO
WNDR
G ST

DELTA FA IRBLVD

LONE TREE WAY

HILLCREST AVE
D

EERVALLEY
RD
0 4,100 8,2002,050
Feet
N

1. Move frame to project location

2. Set scale to preferred scale

3. Save preferred scale to bookmarks with specific details

4. Turn on / Add layers as appropriate

5. If using aerial, decide between ESRI or Bing (which ever is better)

6. Once set, convert street labels to annotations, and adjust position accordingly (or do in AI)

7. Export as Adobe Illustrator file
AUTO

CENTERDR

SOMERSVILLERD
10TH ST
18TH ST

PUTNAM ST
L ST

BUCHANANRD
4th St
CO
NT
RA
LOM
A
BLVD

WILBUR AVE

JAMES DONLON BLVD

DAVISON DR

LAURELRD

EMPIRE AVE
A ST

GENTRYTOW
N
DR
G ST

DELTA FAIR BLVD

LONE TREE WAY

HILLCREST AVE

DEERVALLEY R
D
0 4,100 8,2002,050
Feet
N

1. Move frame to project location

2. Set scale to preferred scale

3. Save preferred scale to bookmarks with specific details

4. Turn on / Add layers as appropriate

5. If using aerial, decide between ESRI or Bing (which ever is better)

6. Once set, convert street labels to annotations, and adjust position accordingly (or do in AI)

7. Export as Adobe Illustrator file City of Antioch Housing Element Update Attachment A
Sites Inventory
Source: Urban Planning Partners, 2022.

Nonvacant Sites
Vacant Sites
Aﬀordable Housing Sites
N
0 4,100 8,2002,050
Feet
A12

ATTACHMENT C
C1
C2
C3
C4

ATTACHMENT D
D1
D2
D3
D4
6th Cycle Housing Element
2023-2031 Update
City Council Study Session | June 14, 2022
SM-1.02
For Review this Evening. . .
2 • Presentation on draft Housing Element Update
• Public Comment
• Council discussion/questions for Staff and the Consultant • Provide feedback on the draft Housing Element
• Authorize staff sending draft Housing Element to HCD
Summary of Study Sessions
• October 6, 2021 – Planning Commission
• Presentation on Housing Element, Environmental Hazards Element, and Environmental Justice Requirements
• October 26, 2021 – City Council
• Presentation on Housing Element, Environmental Hazards Element, and Environmental Justice Requirements
• November 17, 2021 – Planning Commission
• Environmental Justice and Housing Element’s CEQA Scoping Session • May 18, 2022 – Planning Commission
• Draft Housing Element Public Review
• June 1, 2022 – Planning Commission
• Draft Housing Element Public Review
3 What is a Housing Element?
• Required Element of the General Plan
(California Government Code Sections 65580-
65589.8)
• A plan to meet the community’s housing needs
and goals over the next 8 years
• Reviewed by California Department of Housing
and Community Development (HCD)
• This update covers the 2023-2031 planning
period
4 Antioch Regional Housing Needs Allocation
Income Category RHNA 5: 2015-2023
(units)
RHNA 6: 2023-2031
(units)
Very Low Income 349 (24%) 792 (26%)
Low Income 205 (14%) 456 (15%)
Moderate Income 214 (15%) 494 (17%)
Above Moderate Income 680 (47%) 1,275 (42%)
Total 1,448 3,016
5 Source: Final RHNA Plan for the San Francisco Bay Area: 2023-2031 Housing Element Components

1. Housing Needs Assessment

2. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
(AFFH)

3. Constraints Analysis

4. Evaluation of Past Performance

5. Resources and Housing Sites Inventory

6. Goals, Policies and Programs

7. Community Outreach & Engagement
6 Chapters
7 Component 2023-2031 Draft Housing Element
Housing Needs Assessment Chapter 2 (and Appendix A)
AFFH Chapter 3 (and Appendix B)
Constraints Analysis Chapter 4
Housing Resources and Sites Inventory Chapters 5-6 (and Appendix C) Policies and Programs Chapter 7
Community Outreach & Engagement Chapter 8 (and Appendix E) Evaluation of Past Performance Appendix D
New Components to 6th Cycle
• Environmental Justice
• Environmental Hazards Element
• Objective Development Standards
• Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH)*
• Public Comment and HCD Review Timing
8 AFFH: New Requirement for the 6th Cycle
Housing Element Update
• Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing: AB
686 (2018)
• Four main goals:
• Address significant disparities in housing needs and in access to opportunity
• Replace segregated living patterns with truly
integrated and balanced living patterns
• Transform racially and ethnically concentrated areas
of poverty into areas of opportunity
• Foster and maintain compliance with civil rights and
fair housing laws
9 Public Comment: New Requirement for the 6th
Cycle Housing Element Update
• Public Comment and HCD Review
• AB 215 (2021)
• 30-day public comment period for draft Housing
Element prior to HCD’s review
• Antioch’s public comment period is May 16-June 15
• 7-day public comment period for subsequent drafts
10 Sites Inventory
11 Extremely- and
Very Low Income Low Income Moderate
Income
Above Moderate
Income Total
2023-2031 RHNA 792 456 493 1,275 3,016
Pipeline Units
(AMCAL Project) 91 299 0 4 394
Projected ADUs 41 41 41 13 136
Future Multi-Family
Development on
Sites in the Inventory
967 548 947 2,113 4,575
Total 1,099 888 988 2,130 5,105
Buffer Percentage 39% 95% 100% 67% 69%
Sites
Inventory
12 Goals, Policies, and Programs
• Goals: broad statement of
desired outcome
• Policies: Guide decision
makers, staff, and other
representatives in day-to-day
operations
• Programs: Specific activities
that implement policies
• See Chapter 7
13 Goal 1: Housing Conservation and Improvement
Goal 2: Housing Production
Goal 3: Special Needs Housing
Goal 5: Fair Housing
Goal 4: Elimination of Governmental Constraints

Community Engagement
• February 17, 2022 – Community
Meeting #1
• April 13, 2022 – Community Meeting
#2
• May 4, 2022 – Community Meeting
#3 (Bilingual)
• Online Survey
• Focus groups and interviews with
stakeholders
• Chapter 8 and Appendix E
14 Key Topics
• Disperse affordable housing opportunities throughout the city and consider proximity to transit and services
• Desire for more tenant protections, including discrimination and harassment protection, just cause policies, and rent control • Concerns over the safety of current housing stock and lack of landlord accountability
• Community support for rezoning commercial sites for residential uses and an inclusionary housing requirement
15 Planning Commission Review
• Public Comments:
• Desire for additional tenant protections
• Concerns regarding harassment from landlords, cost-burden, and high rates of eviction
• Desire for protections including rent control, and Anti-Harassment Ordinance, and a “Just Cause” Ordinance
• Planning Commissioner Comments:
• Consider rent control, a “just cause” ordinance, and “anti-harassment” ordinance • Conduct a cost-benefit analysis for the creation of “right to counsel” programming • Consider down payment assistance and rent assistance alternatives and programs. • Consider options that offer tenants the first right of refusal to purchase their unit if offered for sale
16 Next Steps
• Consolidate comments and send to the State
• Ongoing work on EIR, Environmental Hazards and EJ elements, rezoning, and objective standards
• State comments in mid-September
• Formal adoption in late 2022/early 2023
17 Questions? Comments?
18 6to elemento de vivienda del ciclo
Actualización 2023-2031
Sesión de estudio del Ayuntamiento | 14 de junio de 2022 SM-1.02.Spanish
Para revisar esta tarde. . .
2 • Presentación del proyecto de actualización del elemento Vivienda • Comentario del público
• Debate/preguntas del consejo para el personal y el consultor • Proporcionar comentarios sobre el proyecto de elemento de vivienda • Autorizar al personal a enviar el proyecto del elemento de vivienda al HCD Resumen de las sesiones de estudio
• 6 de octubre de 2021 - Comisión de planificación
• Presentación sobre el elemento de vivienda, el elemento de riesgos ambientales y los requisitos de justicia ambiental
• 26 de octubre de 2021 - Ayuntamiento
• Presentación sobre el elemento de vivienda, el elemento de riesgos ambientales y los requisitos de justicia ambiental
• 17 de noviembre de 2021 - Comisión de planificación
• Sesión de evaluación del elemento de justicia ambiental y de vivienda de la CEQA
• 18 de mayo de 2022 - Comisión de planificación
• Revisión pública del borrador del elemento de vivienda • 1 de junio de 2022 - Comisión de planificación
• Revisión pública del borrador del elemento de vivienda 3 ¿Qué es un elemento de vivienda?
• Elemento obligatorio del Plan general
(Gobierno de California Secciones de código
65580-65589.8)
• Un plan para atender las necesidades y los
objetivos de vivienda de la comunidad en los
próximos 8 años
• Revisado por el Departamento de Vivienda y
Desarrollo Comunitario de California (HCD)
• Esta actualización abarca el periodo de
planificación 2023-2031
4 Asignación de las necesidades regionales de
vivienda de Antioch
Categoría de ingresos RHNA 5: 2015-2023
(unidades)
RHNA 6: 2023-2031
(unidades)
Ingresos muy bajos 349 (24%) 792 (26%)
Ingresos bajos 205 (14%) 456 (15%)
Ingresos moderados 214 (15%) 494 (17%)
Ingresos superiores a los
moderados
680 (47%) 1.275 (42%)
Total 1.448 3.016
5 Fuente: Final RHNA Plan for the San Francisco Bay Area (Plan final de RHNA para el Área de la Bahía de San Francisco): 2023-2031 Componentes del elemento de vivienda

1. Evaluación de las necesidades de
vivienda

2. Promoción Afirmativa de la Vivienda
Justa (AFFH)

3. Análisis de restricciones

4. Evaluación de los resultados anteriores

5. Inventario de recursos y sitios de
viviendas

6. Objetivos, políticas y programas

7. Alcance y compromiso de la comunidad
6 Capítulos
7 Componente Proyecto de elemento de vivienda
2023-2031
Evaluación de las necesidades de vivienda Capítulo 2 (y Anexo A) AFFH Capítulo 3 (y Anexo B)
Análisis de restricciones Capítulo 4
Inventario de recursos y sitios de viviendas Capítulos 5-6 (y Anexo C) Políticas y programas Capítulo 7
Alcance y compromiso de la comunidad Capítulo 8 (y Anexo E) Evaluación de los resultados anteriores Anexo D
Nuevos componentes para el 6° ciclo
• Justicia medioambiental
• Elemento de riesgo ambiental
• Normas de desarrollo objetivo
• Promoción Afirmativa de la Vivienda Justa (AFFH)*
• Comentarios del público y calendario de revisión del HCD 8 AFFH: Nuevo requisito para la actualización
del 6° ciclo del elemento de vivienda
• Promoción Afirmativa de la Vivienda Justa:

AB 686 (2018)
• Cuatro objetivos principales:
• Abordar las disparidades significativas en las
necesidades de vivienda y en el acceso a las
oportunidades
• Reemplazar los modelos de vida segregados por
modelos de vida verdaderamente integrados y
equilibrados
• Transformar las áreas de pobreza concentradas racial
y étnicamente en áreas de oportunidad
• Fomentar y mantener el cumplimiento de las leyes
sobre derechos civiles y vivienda justa
9 Comentario del público: Nuevo requisito para la
actualización del 6° ciclo del elemento de vivienda
• Comentarios del público y revisión del HCD
• AB 215 (2021)
• Periodo de comentarios públicos de 30 días para el
borrador del elemento de vivienda antes de la revisión
del HCD
• El periodo de comentarios públicos de Antioch es del 16 de mayo al 15 de junio
• Periodo de comentarios públicos de 7 días para los
siguientes borradores
10 Inventario de sitios
11 Ingresos
extremadamente
bajos y muy bajos
Ingresos
bajos
Ingresos
moderados
Ingresos superiores
a los moderados Total
2023-2031 RHNA 792 456 493 1.275 3.016
Unidades de tuberías
(Proyecto AMCAL) 91 299 0 4 394
ADU proyectadas 41 41 41 13 136
Futuros desarrollos
plurifamiliares en
sitios del inventario
967 548 947 2.113 4.575
Total 1.099 888 988 2.130 5.105
Porcentaje de margen 39% 95% 100% 67% 69%
Inventario
de sitios
12 Objetivos, políticas y programas
• Objetivos: declaración
amplia del resultado
deseado
• Políticas: Orientar a los
responsables de la toma de
decisiones, al personal y a
otros representantes en las
operaciones cotidianas
• Programas: Actividades
específicas de aplicación de
las políticas
• Consulte el capítulo 7
13 Objetivo 1: Conservación y mejora de la vivienda
Objetivo 2: Producción de la vivienda
Objetivo 3: Viviendas para personas con
necesidades especiales
Objetivo 5: Vivienda Justa
Objetivo 4: Eliminación de las restricciones
gubernamentales

Compromiso de la comunidad
• 17 de febrero de 2022 - Reunión
comunitaria N.º 1
• 13 de abril de 2022 - Reunión
comunitaria N.º 2
• 4 de mayo de 2022 - Reunión
comunitaria N.º 3 (bilingüe)
• Encuesta en línea
• Grupos de discusión y entrevistas
con las personas interesadas
• Capítulo 8 y Anexo E
14 Temas principales
• Dispersar las oportunidades de vivienda asequible en toda la ciudad y considerar la proximidad al tránsito y los servicios
• Deseo de más protecciones para los inquilinos, incluida la protección contra la discriminación y el acoso, las políticas de causa justa y el control de los alquileres
• Inquietudes acerca de la seguridad del actual parque de viviendas y la falta de responsabilidad de los propietarios
• Apoyo de la Comunidad a la rezonificación de terrenos comerciales para usos residenciales y a un requisito de inclusión de viviendas 15 Revisión de la Comisión de Planificación
• Comentarios del público:
• Deseo de más protecciones para los inquilinos
• Inquietud por la seguridad del parque de viviendas actual y la falta de responsabilidad de los propietarios
• Deseo de protección que incluya el control de los alquileres, una ordenanza contra el acoso y una ordenanza de "causa justa".
• Comentarios del Comisionado de Planificación:
• Considerar el control de alquileres, una ordenanza de "causa justa" y una ordenanza "contra el acoso".
• Realizar un análisis de costos y beneficios para la creación de un programa de "derecho a la asesoría".
• Considerar las alternativas y programas de ayuda al pago inicial y al alquiler. • Considerar opciones que ofrezcan a los inquilinos el primer derecho de rechazo a comprar su unidad si se pone a la venta
16 Próximos pasos
• Consolidar los comentarios y enviarlos al Estado
• Trabajo en curso sobre el EIR, los elementos de Riesgos Ambientales y EJ, la rezonificación y las normas objetivas
• Comentarios del Estado a mediados de septiembre
• Adopción formal a finales de 2022/principios de 2023
17 ¿Preguntas? ¿Comentarios?
18 1
Agenda #

INTRODUCTION OF NEW CITY EMPLOYEES
DATE: Regular Meeting of June 14, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
SUBMITTED BY: Nickie Mastay, Administrative Services Director ➢ Interim Police Chief Steven Ford would like to introduce:
▪ Thomas McKenzie, Police Officer
t0

RECOGNIZING JUNE 2022 AS

PRIDE MONTH

IN THE CITY OF ANTIOCH

WHEREAS, this month and every month, the City of Antioch stands with the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer (LGBTQ+) community as they declare their pride in who they are and who they love;

WHEREAS, during Pride Month, we are reminded that our City’s remarkable diversity is a gift that makes all of us stronger, and we rededicate ourselves to the ongoing cause of equality, acceptance, and freedom for all;

WHEREAS, while society at large increasingly supports LGBTQ+ equality, it is essential to acknowledge that the need for education and awareness remains vital to end discrimination and prejudice;

WHEREAS, as we celebrate the resilience of the LGBTQ+ community and their hard-won victories to advance acceptance and equality, we stand together, united, to defend and build on the progress of the LGBTQ+ community toward a better, more inclusive, and safer future for all;

WHEREAS, with the rainbow flag proudly raised at City Hall, Antioch stands with LGBTQ+ people, their loved ones, and allies throughout the state and across the country; and

WHEREAS, celebrating Pride Month influences awareness and provides support and advocacy for Antioch's LGBTQ+ community, and is an opportunity to take action and engage in dialogue to strengthen alliances, build acceptance and advance equal rights.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, LAMAR A. THORPE, Mayor of the City of Antioch, do hereby declare the month of June 2022 as Pride Month in the City of Antioch and invite everyone to reflect on ways we can live and work together with a commitment to mutual respect and understanding.

JUNE 14, 2022

__________________________________________
LAMAR A. THORPE, Mayor 2.01
06-14-22

PROCLAMATION COMMEMORATING
JUNETEENTH 2022

WHEREAS, Juneteenth is recognized as the end of chattel slavery in the United States and liberation from the greatest robbery of Black wealth in our country’s history;

WHEREAS, although President Abraham Lincoln first issued the Emancipation Proclamation effective January 1, 1863, freeing the slaves in the South, that order was ignored by southern slave owners;

WHEREAS, on June 19th, 1865, Union soldiers arrived in Galveston, Texas and enforced the President’s order, freeing the slaves two and a half years after it was first decreed on the day now known as Juneteenth;

WHEREAS, through other systems of oppression, such as sharecropping, Jim Crow, redlining, and mass incarceration, the plunder of Black bodies and Black wealth continued past slavery and persist to this day, affecting the physical and mental health, safety, and education of African Americans;

WHEREAS, liberation from these systems of oppression demands nothing less than Black economic liberation manifested in financial literacy, access to loans, jobs, and the means of self-improvement, and the ability to own the land in one’s own neighborhood; and

WHEREAS, many African Americans have substantially advanced and continue to build wealth within the Black community in and beyond our City boundaries.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, LAMAR A. THORPE, Mayor of the City of Antioch, do hereby acknowledge June 19th, 2022, as Juneteenth in the City of Antioch, the annual recognition of Black emancipation, the celebration of the past, present, and future of Black economic liberation and our commitment to eradicate systemic racism that undermines our collective prosperity.

JUNE 14, 2022

__________________________________________
LAMAR A. THORPE, Mayor

2.02 06-14-22
#3

BIKE RIDE
Sesquicentennial1872 2022

COMMUNITY
Prewett Park/Antioch Water Park
4701 Lone Tree Way Antioch, 94531
Registration begins at 8am

Bring your bike and a helmet!
6 mile and
3 mile loops
Commemorative Sesquicentennial t-shirt
$5 Gift Card from Baskin Robbins provided by
511 Contra Costa (while supplies last)
50% off Antioch Water Park admission (valid 6/26/22)
$10 Pre-registration Includes:

Sunday,
June 26th
9am-12pm

BOARDS / COMMISSION / COMMITTEE

VACANCY ANNOUNCEMENTS
Your interest and desire to serve our community is appreciated.

The City of Antioch encourages residents to become involved in their local community. One way to do so is to serve on various commissions, boards and committees. Any interested resident is encouraged to apply for the vacancy listed below. To be considered for these volunteer positions, a completed application must be received in the Office of the City Clerk by 5:00 p.m., on June 29, 2022. Applications are available at https://www.antiochca.gov/#. ➢ SALES TAX CITIZENS’ OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE
➢ CONTRA COSTA COUNTY MOSQUITO & VECTOR CONTROL

BOARD OF TRUSTEES
➢ BOARD OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS
#4

SALES TAX CITIZENS’ OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE
(EXTENDED Deadline date: 06/29/2022)
Four (4) Committee Members, full-term vacancies, expiring March 2026 ▪ A Sales T ax Citizens’ Oversight Committee has been established following the voters passing Ballot Measure C – Transaction and Use (Sales) T ax. This passed at the November 5, 2013 Consolidated Election. At the November 6, 2018 Consolidated Election, the voters passed Ballot Measure W – Transaction and Use (Sales) T ax.
▪ Each year, an independent auditor shall complete a public audit report of the revenue raised and its expenditure. The Sales T axCitizens’ Oversight Committee shall review the expenditures and report publicly how the funds are being used to address the City Council’s stated priorities of maintaining Antioch’s fiscal stability, police patrols, 911 emergency response, youth violence prevention programs; ensuring water quality/safety; repairing streets; cleaning up parks/illegal dumping; restoring youth afterschool/summer programs; and other essential services. The Committee’s review shall be completed in conjunction with the City’s budget process. The Committee’s report on its review, whether oral or written, shall be considered by the City Council at a public meeting before April 1 of each year. Any written report shall be a matter of public record.
▪ The Committee shall meet at least twice a year. The meetings will be public. ▪ The Sales T ax Citizens’ Oversight Committee consists of seven members who are Antioch residents. At least one member of the Committee shall have a financial, accounting or auditing background. The Committee will be nominated by the Mayor and approved by the City Council. ▪ Members of the Sales T ax Citizens’ Oversight Committee will be required to file an annual "Statement of Economic Interest".

CONTRA COSTA MOSQUITO & VECTOR CONTROL

BOARD OF TRUSTEES
(EXTENDED Deadline date: 06/29/2022)
One (1) Antioch Citizen Representative Vacancy
▪ The Antioch City Council is seeking candidates for its representative to the Contra Costa Mosquito & Vector Control Board of Trustees.
▪ The Board of Trustees are officials appointed by their respective City Councils to govern the Mosquito and Vector Control District knowledgeably and effectively. They serve for a term of two to four years and are highly dedicated to this community service.
▪ Must be an Antioch resident and at least the voting age of 18 with an interest in any of the foIIowing areas: public health, public policy, wetlands, farming, community education, finance, personnel or land development, and a resident of the city which is in the District (California Health & Safety Code, Section 2242) ▪ The regular business meetings are held on the second Monday night of every other month. All meetings are currently conducted via Zoom in accordance with Government Code section 54935E.
▪ Additional information regarding the responsibilities and duties are available online at www.ContraCostaMosquito.com

BOARD OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS
(EXTENDED Deadline date: 06/29/2022)
One (1) Alternate Member, 2-year term vacancy
▪ Board of Administrative Appeals consists of five members and one alternate to be appointed by the Mayor and confirmed by a majority of the Council. The alternate member shall serve a term of two years.
▪ Must be a resident of the City of Antioch.
▪ The Board hears appeals regarding administrative decisions by any official of the City dealing with Municipal Code interpretations.
▪ Three of the members shall have experience in the building construction trades and/or training in the California Code of Regulations.
▪ Meetings are held the first Thursday of every month at 3:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers; or on other dates as needed.
▪ Commissioners are required to submit a FPPC Form 700 (Statement of Economic Interests) upon assuming office, and every year thereafter no later than April 1st. ▪ Newly appointed Commissioners are also required to complete the AB 1234 Ethics training within 1- year of their appointment. All Commissioners must then take the AB 1234 Ethics training every two years thereafter. The Ethics training is available online.

Contra Costa County
Fire Protection District
Overview for Community Leaders
City of Antioch
City Council Presentation
June 14, 2022
Fire Chief Lewis Broschard
#5.01
Con Fire, Your Fire “Department” in Antioch
● Annexation Update
● Enhancing Capabilities
County-wide
● Fire Weather Outlook
● Safety Tips for Residents
● What “You” Can Do
● Questions

Antioch 2020
& 21 Incidents

Annexation Update
● Decades-long interest and years of
planning
● Con Fire poised to annex East Con
on July 1
● Immediate improvements to fire &
EMS services in east & countywide
○ New stations and crews
○ ALS EMS to be introduced countywide
○ Shortened response times
● Related West County Improvements

Similar Consolidation of Fire Services in W est County
● Contract for services model
planning
● Would bring Pinole Fire into
Con Fire family
● Con Fire and City of Pinole
leaders collaborating in effort
● Measure X funded
● Would include reopening of
long-shuttered Fire Station 74

Continual Fire Service Improvements
● Handcrew Worker Program “Crew 12”
expansion
● New apparatus support diverse needs
○ “Type 6” Wildland Fire Engines
○ Fire “Dozers”
○ Water Tenders
● New and improved stations
○ New FS 86 set to replace historic 86 in May
○ Renovated FS 4 reopening in Walnut Creek
○ Buchanan Field and Fire Station 9 in planning
○ Three East County stations
● Evacuation goes digital

•ALERTWildfire Camera Network
•State-of-the-art high-res pan-tilt-zoom cameras
•10 or more cameras in Contra Costa, more coming
•Real-time, actionable intel
•Situational Awareness Tools
•Tablet Command response and incident management tool
•Pulsepoint
•Computer Aided Dispatch and NWS notifications
•Evacuation Planning – Zonehaven
Implementation
•Grant-funded digitization project
•To bring major improvements to evacuation planning and conduct

FIRE SER VICE TECHNOLOGY ADV ANCES

Wildfire Threat Remains High
● Trend to ever-longer, less
predictable fire weather continues
● All indicators point to earlier,
dangerous season of fire weather
● No area of County is risk free, some
at heightened risk
● Contra Costa County is far from
immune to dangers

In Fact, In 2021…
● Wind-driven vegetation fires proved
dangerous across the County
● Displacing 50+ residents from
homes and apartments
● None were in the highest threat
zones
● Lack of preparation – weed
abatement and defensible space
creation – played a part in each

Beyond Wildfire Danger…
● Simple steps save lives in fires:
○ Working and tested smoke alarms
○ Sleeping with bedroom doors CLOSED
○ Regularly rehearsed home evacuation plans
○ Meeting points known to all residents
● Preventing the most common fires:
○ Use a kitchen fire extinguisher
○ Don’t overload electrical circuits
○ Use caution with ALL open flames
○ Follow space heater safety guidelines
● Carbon Monoxide safety:
○ Use CO monitors, test regularly
○ Maintain all heating equipment in good
working order
VISIT WWW.CCCFPD.ORG FOR MORE

SAFETY TIPS
•We can’t do it alone
•The FIRST first responder is the
resident who prepares in advance
•Property owners, families, neighbors
must work together – ahead of the
disaster
•This is the place to start for wildland
fire and other disasters…

RESIDENT INVOLVEMENT IS KEY

IN ANY DISASTER
References
● Con Fire Community Risk Reduction Info –
cccfpd.org/community-risk-reduction/
● Wildfire Prep – cccfpd.org/wildfire-prep/
● How to report weed abatement complaints –
cccfpd.org/exterior-hazard-complaint/
● Community Warning System – cwsalerts.com/
● Zonehaven “Know Your Zone” Evacuation Tool –
cwsalerts.com/know-your-zone/
● Residents Guide to Wildfire Prep & Evac –
cccfpd.org/residents-wildland-fire-guide/
Questions?
Antioch 2020 & 21 Incidents
2022 Incidents Year-to-Date

Alarm -- Med/Fire 433
EMS 9,167
EMS - Ambulance
Only 393
Fire -
Exterior/Vegetation 402
Fire - Other 5
Fire - Structure 467
Fire - Vehicle 70
Hazard Cond./Hazmat 173
Other 13
Rescue 31
Service/Assist 169
Vehicle Accident 581
Antioch
Police
Department
June 2022
Crime & Activity
Report
#5.02
1068 946 849 771 760 607 602 648 592 746
4757
4440 4190
3912 3690 3838
3330 3199
2719
2260
5825
5386
5039
4683 4450 4445
3932 3847
3311
3006
0 1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
VIOLENT PROPERTY PART 1 TOTAL Linear (PART 1 TOTAL)
*Total Part I Crimes Excluding Arson
2022
CRIME
DATA
HOMICIDE, 5, 1%
RAPE, 24, 2%
ROBBERY, 54, 5%

AGGRAVATED ASSAULT,
193, 18%
BURGLARY, 109, 10%
THEFT, 444, 41%
AUTO THEFT, 242, 22%
ARSON, 13, 1%
*In December 2021, APD transitioned to from UCR to the NIBRS method of crime stat reporting. Some of the impacts of this change include allowing for multiple crime types to be associated with one incident and the conversion of robbery from a person crime to a property crime. Additionally, the 2022 crime stat data is based on unaudited RMS data at the time of report generation and is subject to change.

2021-2022
CRIME
DATA
*In December 2021, APD transitioned to from UCR to the NIBRS method of crime stat reporting. Some of the impacts of this change include allowing for multiple crime types to be associated with one incident and the conversion of robbery from a person crime to a property crime. Therefore, comparing historical UCR data to NIBRS data should have these changes taken into consideration.

Additionally, the 2022 crime stat data is based on unaudited RMS data at the time of report generation and is subject to change.

CRIME COMPARISON
2021 vs 2022
HOMICIDE, 5,
0% RAPE, 16, 2%
ROBBERY, 54, 5%

AGGRAVATED
ASSAULT, 201,
19%

BURGLARY,
109, 10%THEFT, 442,
41%

AUTO THEFT,
241, 22%
ARSON, 13, 1%
2021 2022 #Change %Change
Jan-May Jan-May 2021 vs 2022 2021 vs 2022
HOMICIDE 1 5 4 400.0%
RAPE 5 24 19 380.0%
AGGRAVATED ASSAULT 223 193 -30 -13.5%
ROBBERY 34 54 20 58.8%
BURGLARY 139 109 -30 -21.6%
THEFT 548 444 -104 -19.0%
AUTO THEFT 214 242 28 13.1%
ARSON 16 13 -3 -18.8%
INDEX CRIME TOTAL 1180 1084 -96 -8.14%
Jan – May
2022

NIBRS CRIME
DATA
*In December 2021, APD transitioned to from UCR to the NIBRS method of crime stat reporting. Some of the impacts of this change include allowing for multiple crime types to be associated with one incident and the conversion of robbery from a person crime to a property crime. Therefore, comparing historical UCR data to NIBRS data should have these changes taken into consideration. Additionally, the 2022 crime stat data is based onunaudited RMS data at the time of report generation and is subject to change. See APD Website- Crime Statistics for additional information on the transition from NIBRS to UCR.

NIBRS GROUP NIBRS CODE Jan-22 Feb-22 Mar-22 Apr-22 May-22 A
09A-Murder & Nonnegligent Manslaughter (A) 4 1 0 0 0
09B-Negligent Manslaughter (A) 0 0 0 0 0
09C-Justifiable Homicide (A) 0 0 0 0 1
100-Kidnapping/Abduction (A) 6 2 4 2 2
11A-Rape (A) 6 2 4 8 4
11B-Sodomy (A) 1 0 1 0 0
11C - Sexual Assault With An Object (A) 0 2 0 0 0
11D-Fondling (A) 3 6 5 5 5
13A-Aggravated Assault (A) 35 32 42 52 32
13B-Simple Assault (A) 51 50 73 75 84
13C-Intimidation (A) 2 4 13 11 6
36B-Statutory Rape (A) 2 1 0 0 2
64B-Human Trafficking, Involuntary Servitude (A) 0 1 0 0 0 120-Robbery (A) 13 14 12 6 9
200-Arson (A) 3 3 2 2 3
220-Burglary/Breaking & Entering (A) 31 19 21 25 13
23A-Pocket-picking (A) 2 0 1 1 1
23B-Purse-snatching (A) 0 2 1 2 2
23C-Shoplifting (A) 17 15 11 14 11
23D-Theft From Building (A) 4 3 6 5 5
23F-Theft From Motor Vehicle (A) 17 18 16 17 16
23G-Theft of Motor Vehicle Parts or Accessories (A) 15 18 8 10 3 23H-All Other Larceny (A) 53 44 46 51 9
240-Motor Vehicle Theft (A) 42 51 40 50 59
250-Counterfeiting/Forgery (A) 1 2 1 2 1
26A-False Pretenses/Swindle/Confidence Game (A) 4 3 1 3 3 26B-Credit Card/Automated Teller Machine Fraud (A) 23 12 18 14 1 26C-Impersonation (A) 19 14 8 11 0
26F-Identitiy Theft (A) 1 0 1 1 0
270-Embezzlement (A) 1 0 1 1 0
280-Stolen Property Offenses (A) 9 19 9 8 5
290-Destruction/Damage/Vandalism of Property (A) 26 50 62 37 29 35A-Drug/Narcotic Violations (A) 12 11 7 6 3
35B-Drug Equipment Violations (A) 5 1 1 1 0
370-Pronography/Obscene Material (A) 0 0 0 0 2
40B-Assisting or Promoting Prostitution (A) 0 1 0 0 0
520-Weapon Law Violations (A) 15 19 17 8 13
720-Animal Cruelty (A) 0 0 0 0 0
Total Group A 423 420 432 428 324

VIOLENT
CRIME

HOMICIDE

AGGRAVATED ASSAULT
RAPE

ROBBERY
Homicides have remained relatively
consistent over the years, but
aggravated assaults have
increasingly dominated our violent
crime numbers.
*2021-2022 NIBRS Crime Stats are based on unaudited RMS data at the time of report generation and is subject to change. 12, 2%
55, 8%
238, 37%
343, 53%
2019
10, 2%
40, 7%
142, 24%
400, 67%
2020
12, 2%
39, 6%
135, 19%507, 73%
2021

VIOLENT
CRIME

HOMICIDE

AGGRAVATED ASSAULT
RAPE

ROBBERY
Homicides have remained relatively
consistent over the years, but
aggravated assaults have
increasingly dominated our violent
crime numbers.
12, 2%
55, 8%
238, 37%
343, 53%
2019
10, 2%
40, 7%
142, 24%
400, 67%
2020
12, 2%
39, 6%
135, 19%507, 73%
2021
5, 2%
24, 9%
54, 19%
193, 70%
January - May 2022
*2021-2022 NIBRS Crime Stats are based on unaudited RMS data at the time of report generation and is subject to change. 8 24
19 6
32 18
13 33
16 12
39 9
17 28
7 17
17 42
28 18
29 28
23 43
28 40
10 29
13 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
2020
2021
2022
Evidence Firearms Recovered
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
304 TOTAL
102 PMF
59 76
140
241
69 0
50 100
150
200
250
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

FIREARM AGGRAVATED ASSAULTS
ANNUAL 2018-2021
JANUARY - MAY 2022
PMF = unserialized
privately made
firearms
(i.e. “ghost-guns”)
January to
May ONLY
273 TOTAL
82 PMF
69 TOTAL
26 PMF
The total “calls for service” (CFS) can be explained as the volume of documented incidents generated from 911 and non-emergency calls, as well as officer self- initiated activity.
81569 78788 80404 83496 87285 89321 88123
94670 92550 89016
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

TOTAL CALLS FOR

SERVICE
PRIORITY DESCRIPTION 2021 # CALLS

FOR SERVICE
JAN – MAY
2022 CFS
1 Emergency 6,399 (7%) 2,666 (8%)
2 Urgent 37,836 (43%) 15,677 (47%)
3 Routine 30,415 (34%) 10,048 (30%)
4 & 5 Informational 14,366 (16%) 5,014 (15%)
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000
ASSAULT WITH DEADLY…

ROBBERY

FORGERY/FRAUD

SEX CRIMES

WEAPONS

DOMESTIC/FAMILY

DEATH/SUICIDE

VANDALISM

SHOOTING

BURGLARY

ASSAULT

VEHICLE THEFT/RECOVERY
THEFT
ANIMAL

CITIZEN REQUESTS

TRAFFIC
ALARM

SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY

OTHER CALLS

INFORMATION

PERSON/VEHICLE STOPS

FIRE/MEDICAL

QUALITY OF LIFE
2021 CFS Categories
0:10:30 0:10:36 0:10:06 0:09:48 0:08:46 0:08:54 0:08:23 0:07:36 00:08:58 0:09:01 0:36:22 0:38:29 0:39:28 0:36:01 0:27:08 0:29:14 0:27:14 0:22:22 00:26:06 0:27:07 1:37:54 1:25:52 1:13:28
0:55:55
0:34:36 0:38:12 0:32:49
0:22:47
00:27:04 0:27:26
5:01:49
3:52:47
2:17:52
1:28:14
1:01:35 1:00:22
0:34:06
0:27:05 00:20:38 0:08:38
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4
Response Times
Average response times are calculated from the time the call is received at the dispatch center until the officer arrives. Calls for service are labeled as one of five levels of priority. Priority 1 calls are serious crimes in progress or imminent threats to life and safety. Currently, the response time to Priority 1 calls is 9 minutes and one second.

AVERAGE RESPONSE TIMES 2013-2020
2022 RESPONSE TIMES ARE SLOWLY INCREASING,
IN PART DO TO STAFFING SHORTAGE.*
* Unlike our old system, the new Computer Aided Dispatch system (updated Dec 2021) allows officers to self-dispatch during on-view calls, therefore response times are logged as near immediate to low priority on-view incidents, thus accounting for the significant reduction in the Priority 4 response time.

PRIORITY DESCRIPTION
1 Emergency
2 Urgent
3 Routine
4 & 5 Informational

STAFFING & HIRING

DEPARTMENT WIDE
Current Number of Personnel = 148
45 Civilian Staff
103 Sworn
2022 Sworn: 1 hired, 13 vacancies (+6 overhire)
Dispatch: 2 vacancies
Records: 3 vacancies
CSO: 2 vacancies
Animal Control: 3 vacancies

o In 2021-2022, eight proactive sideshow enforcement details were conducted to prevent planned sideshows from occurring
➢ During the three 2022 events, there were 4 arrests and 10 vehicles seized!!
➢ Additionally, one of the suspects that was involved in damaging our patrol vehicle at a recent sideshow had his truck impounded.
o Office of Traffic Safety grants will be used to continue proactive sideshow prevention details on weekends
• Over 40 sideshow related calls for service in Jan. to May 2022 • Approximately 92 sideshow related calls for service in 2021 May 14, 2022
During this event, Traffic Unit Officers from East County and CHP worked collaboratively to conduct traffic stops. APD made 10 traffic stops with 4 citations issued.

On May 27-28, 2022 a proactive
enforcement event successfully prevented
the “925 Block Party 2” from occurring.

In 2021, out of 89,016 calls for service, force was used to effect arrest in 111 incidents or in 0.125% of calls.
2021 TYPES OF FORCE UTILIZED*
Actions Compelling
Uses of Force:

Active Aggression
Assault on Officer
Resisting Arrest
Non-Compliance
Armed Subject
Total Arrests
vs
Use of Force
In the vast majority of encounters, officers are able to gain compliance with de-escalation techniques or verbal commands alone. When those commands are insufficient and subjects choose to ignore instructions or resist, officers may use an array of force options to compel subjects to submit to lawful authority. These options range from physical controls, to less-lethal options (e.g., OC spray, conducted electrical weapons (CEW), or impact weapons), to deadly physical force, when justified by the threat of violence. Please refer to the APD Use of Force Policy for further details.

All uses of force undergo a multi-level supervisory review by management/command staff to ensure the application of force was in compliance with both departmental policy and the law. In any instances where additional review of the incident is deemed necessary the investigation is forwarded to Internal Affairs.

OC Spray
Carotid
Flashlight
40 mm
ECW/Taser
K-9 Utilized
Physical/
Other
* There were 111 incidents where force was used; however, some incidents involved the use of multiple options and/or the same option used by multiple officers.

January to
May 2022:
4 Use of Force
Incidents
Reported*
*additional cases may be pending
or under review
2022: (3) Physical/Other, (1) ECW/Taser
0 1000
2000
3000 2682
649
111 4
Total Arrests
Use of Force
2021 2022
• Collaborative Public Safety Partnership
with Federal and Local Agencies
• Prioritizing Community Involvement
• Creating an anti-violence team to provide focused attention to high crime areas
• Enhancing Department technology and increasing resources to better combat violent crimes (i.e. ShotSpotter)
❖ Develop a coordinated response to involve mental health professionals in response to non-violent incidents
❖ Use City, County, and Non-Profit resources to help those in crisis or in need of housing assistance
Citizen files a
complaint based on
an incident
Each complaint can
involve a single
employee, multiple
employees, or APD in
general
Multiple allegations
can be filed against
each employee or
APD within a single
complaint

COMPLAINT DESCRIPTION
*NOTE: Each complaint may have multiple allegations or
multiple employees involved. Additionally, each employee may have multiple allegations. Therefore, the number of allegations counted per incident and by employee is higher than the total number of complaints and employees involved.

COMPLAINT STATUS
Allegation Category
Number of
Incidents
Involving
Allegation
APD/
Number of
Employees
Involving
Allegation
U
n
f
o
u
n
d
e
d
W
i
t
h
d
r
a
w
n
S
u
s
t
a
i
n
e
d
N
o
t

S
u
s
t
a
i
n
e
d
N
o

F
i
n
d
i
n
g
E
x
o
n
e
r
a
t
e
d
P
e
n
d
i
n
g
2022
Standards of Conduct 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
2021
Standards of Conduct 14 32 3 0 0 5 6 13 5
Search & Seizure 3 5 0 0 0 1 0 4 0
Report Preparation/Investigation 7 12 3 0 0 3 0 3 3
Not Specified 4 9 0 0 0 0 2 7 0
Bias Based Profiling 6 11 2 0 0 4 2 3 0
Use of Force 3 14 8 0 0 3 0 3 0
2020
Standards of Conduct 18 53 4 1 2 36 2 8 0
Search & Seizure 5 8 1 0 0 3 0 4 0
Report Preparation/Investigation 6 14 8 0 3 2 0 1 0
Not Specified 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bias Based Profiling 4 7 0 1 0 4 0 0 2
Use of Force 9 35 3 0 5 10 2 15 0
2019
Standards of Conduct 17 58 7 3 6 38 3 1 0
Search & Seizure 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Report Preparation/Investigation 7 12 1 0 3 5 0 3 0
Records Maintenance & Release 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Not Specified 2 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
Bias Based Profiling 1 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0
Use of Force 6 11 0 0 0 4 0 7 0
23 TOTAL COMPLAINTS with 37 allegations &
39* INVOLVED EMPLOYEES (or APD) with 83 allegations
24 TOTAL COMPLAINTS with 39 allegations &
48 INVOLVED EMPLOYEES (or APD) with 117 allegations
26 TOTAL COMPLAINTS with 35 allegations &
39 INVOLVED EMPLOYEES (or APD) with 89 allegations
* The number of involved employees involved in complaints in 2021/2022 may change as pending investigations develop Complaints for 2022 are being processed and pending*

COMMUNITY FORUMS
GOAL: To build a lasting relationship with our community built on trust and mutual respect ➢ Community Forums will occur monthly and will rotate throughout the four Council Districts to be held at a location of the Council members choosing
➢ Provide community members the opportunity to express their concerns and have meaningful & transparent conversation with Interim Police Chief Ford, members of Command Staff, and Officers from the Department.
➢ Each session will consist of a question-and-
answer session, as well as an opportunity to
pursue one-on-one conversations with APD
personnel
June 22, 2022
6:00 PM – 7:30 PM
Delta Bowl
3300 Delta
Fair Blvd

Community
Engagement
The Antioch Police Department
supports proactive engagement
with our community members
through neighborhood meetings,
annual events, youth outreach,
demonstrations, forums, and
social media.

To learn more about ways to connect or to request an officer for an event, follow us on social media or visit our website.

Events
Holiday Adopt a Family
Holiday Food Drive
Holiday Toy Giveaway
Halloween Trick-or-Treat
Birthday Parades
Citizen’s Academy
Youth Academy
Coffee with the Cops
Tip-A-Cop
Torch Run
Community Fundraisers
Bridging the Gap
In 2021, APD Officers
participated in 683
Community Policing
Activities!
235 and counting so far in
2022!!

CITY COUNCIL MEETING

INCLUDING THE ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL

ACTING AS HOUSING SUCCESSOR

TO THE ANTIOCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY

Regular Meeting April 26, 2022
7:00 P.M. Council Chambers

6:00 P.M. - CLOSED SESSION

1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS – pursuant to California Government Code section 54957.6; City designated representatives: Nickie Mastay, Jazzman Brown, and Jeff Bailey; Employee organizations: Management Unit, Treatment Plant Employees’ Association, Antioch Public Works Association, and Antioch Police Sworn Management Association.

2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION – Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to California Government Code section 54956.9(b): One Case.

ADJOURNED TO CLOSED SESSION

Council adjourned to Closed Session at 6:01 P.M.

7:00 P.M. REGULAR MEETING

Mayor Thorpe called the meeting to order at 7:0 1 P.M., and City Clerk Householder called the roll.

Present: Council/Agency Members District 1 Torres-Walker, District 3 Ogorchock, District 4 Wilson, Mayor Pro Tem (District 2) Barbanica and Mayor Thorpe

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

Mayor Thorpe led the Pledge of Allegiance.

CITY ATTORNEY TO REPORT OUT ON CLOSED SESSION

City Attorney Smith reported the City Council had been in Closed Session and gave the following report: #1 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS , no reportable action; and #2 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION , direction given to Interim City Manager and City Attorney.

1. PROCLAMATIONS

• In Honor of A Home within CASA (Court Appointed Special Advocates) Therapy Project • Arbor Day, April 29, 2022
6A
06-14-22

ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL

HOUSING SUCCESSOR
Regular Meeting
April 26, 2022 Page 2 of 13

On motion by Councilmember Ogorchock , seconded by Councilmember Barbanica the City Council unanimously approved the proclamations.

Mayor Thorpe thanked CASA for their dedication to youth in foster care.

Phillip McCloud, representing CASA, thanked the City Council for the In Honor of A Home within CASA Therapy Project proclamation and for supporting their organization.

Director of Public Works/City Engineer Samuelson thanked the City Council for the Arbor Day, April 29, 2022, proclamation. He invited the community to attend a tree planting at 1:00 P.M. on April 29, 2022, at Antioch Community Park.

2. ANNOUNCEMENTS OF CIVIC AND COMMUNITY EVENTS

Director of Parks and Recreation Helfenberger announced the following civic and community event.

• Recreation Expo – May 7, 2022

Councilmember Wilson announced the following civic and community events.

• Demin Day - April 27, 2022
• Red Sand Project - April 27, 2022
• Shred It Event - April 28, 2022

Mayor Thorpe announced a swearing-in ceremony for Interim Chief Ford would take place at 1:00 P.M. on April 27, 2022, at the Antioch Community Center . He recognized former Interim Chief, Captain Morefield for his service.

3. ANNOUNCEMENTS OF BOARD AND COMMISSION OPENINGS

City Clerk Householder announced the following Board and Commission openings.

➢ Economic Development Commission
➢ Sales Tax Citizens’ Oversight Committee
➢ Contra Costa Mosquito & Vector Control Board of Trustees

For more information and to apply, visit: www.bit.ly/ApplyAntioch or the City’s homepage.

PUBLIC COMMENTS

Barbara Sobalvarro, representing Antioch Friends of Animal Services , announced Be Kind to Animals Week would take place from May 1 – 7, 2022. She provided a history of the Antioch Animal Shelter and their organization.

ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL

HOUSING SUCCESSOR
Regular Meeting
April 26, 2022 Page 3 of 13

Della Curr i stated that her family were victims of the Delta Pines Apartment fire and she expressed concern regarding the management of the complex.

Francisco Torres and Archie Brum field, representing ACCE, expressed concern that tenants were being illegally evicted and requested the City Council consider rent control, just cause and anti-harassment policies.

Michelle Barlow requested Council agendize reconsideration of the RV ordinance to allow residents to park their RVs on their properties.

Lisa Sanders, representing ACCE, reported she was a victim of the Delta Pine Apartment fire, and she believed the man agement of the complex had been n egligent in their response. She spoke in support of rent control, just cause and anti-harassment policies.

Ralph Hernandez, Antioch resident, announced that he submitted materials to the City Council for the public record regarding cases that he had investigated. He requested Council encourage the District Attorney to reopen a case.

John acknowledged Ralph Hernandez for his investigative work. He urged Council to read the information he had provided and contact the District Attorney’s office.

Chris Gilroy , Antioch resident, acknowledged and thanked the Antioch City Council for their accomplishments and encouraged them to remain committed to their efforts.

Roshon Williams requested Council agendize reconsideration of the RV ordinance and review all the information she had previously submitted regarding this matter. She spoke in support of rent control.

Lucas Stuart-Chilcote announced May Day March for International Workers Day, May 1, 2022, and the Interfaith Breaking Fast Dinner , April 30, 2022. He reported f ree at-home covid tests were available by mail at COVID.gov.

Pam Gupta expressed concern recent ordinance restrictions on cigarettes, cigars and cigarillos had created a hardship for low-income customers. She noted it had also impacted their inventory and she requested Council reevaluate these restrictions.

Pasqual Iwoh questioned what the timeframe was for the selection process for those who had applied for Boards and Commissions.

Frank Sterling announced that they would be holding a community event at the Antioch Police Department (APD). He stated that he supported the investigation into APD and the city’s police reform efforts.

CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS/COMMUNICATIONS

ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL

HOUSING SUCCESSOR
Regular Meeting
April 26, 2022 Page 4 of 13

Councilmember Torres-Walker reported on her attendance at the CDBG Committee meeting and announced that she would be attending a Cannabis Standing Committee meeting later this week.

Councilmember Ogorchock discussed Mayor Thorpe ’s prior request to have Mr. Turnage removed from Council Chambers. She explained that he did not have the authority to direct Interim City Manager Johnson to remove a member of the public without Council consensus .

She stated that t his was one of the reasons she request ed Interim City Manager Johnson ’s performance review.

Councilmember Wilson announced she would be attending the Cannabis Standing Committee meeting later this week.

Councilmember Barbanica reported on his attendance at the C DBG Committee meeting and announced that he would be attending a nother meeting this week. He encouraged those interested in applying for CDBG funding, to do so. He thanked the representative from ACCE for connecting him with tenants and encouraged tenants that were being unlawfully evicted to reach out to him. He also requested Mr. Hernandez call him.

Mayor Thorpe apologized to community members who were expect ing to revisit the RV ordinance this evening and noted the item would be on the next agenda. He reviewed the Board and Commission application and interview process. He explained if anyone disrupted a meeting, he would request they leave and if it continued, he would have them escorted out by the Police Chief.

MAYOR’S COMMENTS

4. PRESENTATION

Director of Public Works/City Engineer Samuelson gave a PowerPoint presentation of the Brackish Water Desalination Project Update.

The City Council thanked Director of Public Works/City Engineer Samuelson for the presentation.

In response to Council, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Samuelson discussed the city’s per capita water use , their partnership with Delta Diablo and the process for reducing noise impacts for residents in the area.

Councilmember Ogorchock requested staff provide Council with the project’s landscaping plans.

5. CONSENT CALENDAR for City /City Council Members acting as Housing Successor to the Antioch Development Agency

A. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES FOR MARCH 11, 2022

ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL

HOUSING SUCCESSOR
Regular Meeting
April 26, 2022 Page 5 of 13

B. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MARCH 22, 2022

C. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR APRIL 12, 2022

D. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES FOR APRIL 19, 2022

E. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL WARRANTS

F. APPROVAL OF HOUSING SUCCESSOR WARRANTS

G. REJECTION OF CLAIMS: NIRIVANA ALLEN, OLIVIA ALLEN, NIRIVANA ALLEN, JR.,

KANAI ALLEN, QZAIAH ALLEN, AND CARLA MCLAURIN

H. ORDINANCE NO. 2209-C-S SECOND READING – FORMATION OF THE PROPOSED CITY OF ANTIOCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2022 -01 (PUBLIC SERVICES) FOR LAUREL RANCH SUBDIVISION (PW 698) (Introduced on April 12, 2022)

I. ORDINANCE NO. 2210 -C-S AND ORDINANCE NO. 2211 -C-S SECOND READING – STRATEGIC INFILL HOUSING STUDY (Introduced on April 12, 2022)

J. RESOLUTION NO. 2022/64 FOR ON -CALL CONTRACT PLANNING AND

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SERVICES

K. RESOLUTION NO. 2022/6 5 AMENDING AN EXISTING CONTRACT FOR

CONSULTANT SERVICES WITH URBAN PLANNING PARTNERS FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE 6TH CYCLE HOUSING ELEMENT 2023 -2031 AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT

L. RESOLUTION NO. 2022/6 6 ACCEPTANCE OF WORK AND NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR PREWETT PARK CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS, PHASE II (P.W. 567-9)

M. RESOLUTION NO. 2022/67 WATER RATE STUDY

N. RESOLUTION NO. 2022/6 8 CONSIDERATION OF BIDS FOR CITY PARK LANDSCAPE ENHANCEMENT BID NO. 988-0309-22A

O. RESOLUTION NO. 2022/6 9 ACCEPTING THE OFFERS OF DEDICATION FOR LAUREL ROAD RELATED TO THE LAUREL RANCH SUBDIVISION (P.W. 698)

On motion by Councilmember Ogorchock, seconded by Councilmember Wilson, the City Council unanimously approved the Council Consent Calendar with the exception of item M which was pulled for further discussion.

ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL

HOUSING SUCCESSOR
Regular Meeting
April 26, 2022 Page 6 of 13

Item M – – Councilmember Ogorchock announced that the City was not raising water rates.

Director of Public Works/City Engineer Samuelson presented the staff report dated April 26, 2022, recommending the City Council adopt the water rates without any increase.

On motion by Councilmember Ogorchock, seconded by Councilmember Torres-Walker the City Council unanimously approved Item M.

COUNCIL REGULAR AGENDA

6. UNHOUSED RESIDENT SERVICES – FALL 2022 CYCLE STATE OF CALIFORNIA HOMEKEY PROGRAM AND EXECUTIVE INN LOCATED AT 515 EAST 18TH STREET

Assistant City Manager Bayon Moore presented the staff report dated April 26, 2022, recommending the City Council receive the presentation and adopt the resolution: 1) Authorizing the City to pursue State of California Homekey Program funding for housing opportunities associated with the Executive Inn located at 515 East 18th Street; 2) Pledging the 5 -year City commitment of a subsidy e stimated at $12.3 million dollars in local funds; and 3) Authorizing pursuit of the public procurement process to identify an experienced developer partner to assist with financing, development, long term ownership and operations of the future Homekey site.

Assistant City Manager Bayon Moore introduced Jeree Glasser -Hedrick, Housing Director of Focus Strategies, who gave an Executive Inn Homekey Financing PowerPoint presentation.

Ralph Hernandez stated he did not believe the Executive Inn site was appropr iate for the homeless due to the illegal activity occurring in the area.

Donna Salazar stated this project would not address the issues with the unhoused and she felt it would be too expensive. She reported that she had not received a response from the City’s Unhoused Resident Coordinator.

Andrew Becker stated public safety was a community issue and he encouraged residents to assist those in need. He noted that Homekey was the City’s opportunity to house individuals and the dialog for this item needed to be more robust and inclusive.

Lacey Brown, Antioch resident, encouraged Council to postpone the adoption of the resolution because she felt the City had not looked objectively at other options for their application. She spoke in support of Dignity Moves managing a Homekey project.

Chris Gilroy spoke in support of the Executive Inn project and assisting the homeless with services needed.

Norma Hernandez clarified that homeless residents deserved to be housed in safe locations.

She discussed programs to provide training. She suggested using Homekey funding to build a project and better program.

ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL

HOUSING SUCCESSOR
Regular Meeting
April 26, 2022 Page 7 of 13

Edgar Martinez announced the 2022 Point-In-Time count would be available in May and the 2021 annual report would be available in the summer. He suppo rted further studies and suggested the City consider other options.

An unidentified speaker suggested Antioch emulate successful homeless programs from surrounding cities such as the Trinity Center in Walnut Creek.

Mayor Thorpe discussed the City and Ad Hoc Committees’ efforts to take a proactive approach to provide homeless services in Antioch. He explained the goal of the Executive Inn project was to provide services and temporary stability so people c ould transition out of homelessness. He thanked Unhoused Resident Coordinator Ridley and Assistant City Manager Bayon Moore for their dedication to this project.

Councilmember Barbanica stated he did not feel this was an appropriate location for this project because of the impact it would have on the school and residential neighborhood. He felt the money could be better utilized for other opportunities.

Councilmember Torres-Walker requested the City address safety and beautification in the area and announced that there were organizations that worked with the homeless to give them jobs to clean up neighborhoods. She stated she did not believe there had been a fair assessment by Focus Strategies and suggested the City submit a Project Homekey application that included the Executive Inn as well as other options.

Councilmember Ogorchock suggested agendizing a presentation from Dignity Moves and the City conduct a feasibility study for projects on other potential properties. She expressed concern that the Executive Inn project would deplete the City’s reserves and it did not include services.

She also noted that the City lacked staff to oversee the leasing of the building.

Mayor Thorpe responded that the budget for the Executive Inn Project included wrap-around services and noted that all budget assumptions put the City in a deficit because the numbers did not accurately reflect revenue.

Councilmember Wilson spoke in suppo rt of looking at other opportunities throughout the City and moving forward with this project as soon as possible.

Mayor Thorpe clarified that the City was focused on funding that would be available in October.

He explained Focus Strategies was a neutral party. He cautioned that involving specific developers in meetings could jeopardize their participation in an RFP or RFQ.

Assistant City Manager Bayon Moore clarified that an evaluation of alternatives show ed how they had concluded that the Executive Inn was the only site that could compete successfully with aggressive timelines.

Councilmember Torres-Walker requested the evaluation of alternatives come back to Council as well as presentations from Dignity Moves and Homes First.

ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL

HOUSING SUCCESSOR
Regular Meeting
April 26, 2022 Page 8 of 13

Mayor Thorpe stated that they could postpone this item and discussed the importance of it coming back to Council as soon as possible. He suggested the matter return to Council at a Special Meeting on April 29, 2022. He expressed concern for the voting pattern related to items addressing homelessness.

On motion by Councilmember Torres -Walker, seconded by Councilmember Wilson the City Council postponed this matter. The motion carried the following vote:

Ayes: Torres-Walker, Wilson, Ogorchock, Thorpe Noes: Barbanica

7. BICYCLE GARDEN – SELECTION OF PREFERRED LOCATION AND ONE

ALTERNATE LOCATION, IDENTIFICATION OF CONTRA COSTA

TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY AS LEAD AGENCY OF THE PROJECT, AND

FUNDING AUTHORIZATION FOR SCOPE AND DESIGN PHASE

Director of Parks and Recreation Hel fenberger and Parks and Recreation Commission Chair Marie Arce presented the staff report and PowerPoint presentation dated April 26, 2022, recommending the City Council receive the presentation and adopt the resolution: 1) Selecting the preferred location and one alternate location for the Bicycle Garden; 2) Identifying the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) as the lead agency with the intent to enter in a funding agreement in an amount not to exceed $550,000 for the planning and design of the Bi cycle Garden to be approved by City Council at a future meeting; and 3) Authorizing the Finance Director to make an adjustment to the Fiscal Year 2021/22 and Fiscal Year 2022/23 budget in an amount not to exceed $550,000 from the General Fund for the plann ing and design of the Bicycle Garden.

Following discussion, Council consensus selected Prewett Park a s the preferred location and Gentrytown Park as the alternate location for the Bicycle Garden.

RESOLUTION NO. 2022/70

On motion by Councilmember Ogorchock, seconded by Councilmember Wilson the City Council unanimously adopted the resolution: 1) Selecting the preferred location Prewett Park and one alternate location Gentrytown Park for the Bicycle Garden; 2) Identifying the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) as the lead agency with the intent to enter in a funding agreement in an amount not to exceed $550,000 for the planning and design of the Bicycle Garden to be approved by City Council this evening; and 3) Authorizing the Finance Director to make an adjustment to the Fiscal Year 2021/22 and Fiscal Year 2022/23 budget in an amount not to exceed $550,000 from the General Fund for the planning and design of the Bicycle Garden.

Mayor Thorpe declared a recess at 9:51 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 9:59 P.M. with all Councilmembers present.

ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL

HOUSING SUCCESSOR
Regular Meeting
April 26, 2022 Page 9 of 13

8. DISCUSSION ITEM: TOBACCO ORDINANCE GRACE PERIOD TEMPORARILY

SUSPENDING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF NEW RESTRICTIONS ON SALES OF

TOBACCO OR TO BACCO PRODUCTS WITH CHARACTERIZING FLAVOR,

ELECTRONIC CIGARETTES, CIGARS, AND LITTLE CIGARS

City Attorney Smith presented the staff report dated April 26, 2022, recommending the City Council provide direction to staff concerning: 1) Whether staff should prepare an amendment to the tobacco ordinance implementing a grace period temporarily suspending the implementation of new restrictions on sales of tobacco or tobacco products with characterizing flavor, electronic cigarettes, cigars, and little cig ars; 2) The duration of the grace period, if any and 3) Whether staff should focus on community education and suspend enforcement activity until the passage of the amendment to the ordinance.

Nisha Toor, Jashir Sooch representing Hillcrest Liquor and Lone Tree Liquor, Ralph Hernandez, Antioch resident, Pam Gupta, Antioch resident, and Norma Hernandez spoke in support of an amendment to the tobacco ordinance implementing a grace period.

Jen Graham Lahano representing the American Cancer Society stated she did not support a grace period for this policy; however, if one was extended, she requested it be limited to three months from adoption and stipulate retailers were not allowed to restock products.

Following discussion, Council consensus supported a grace period until December 1, 2022 and directed staff to focus on community education and suspend enforcement.

9. TENTATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANTIOCH AND THE CONFIDENTIAL UNIT FOR THE PERIOD OF OCTOBER 1, 2021 – SEPTEMBER 30, 2025

Administrative Services Director Mastay presented the staff report dated April 26, 2022, recommending the City Council adopt a resolution: 1) Approving the Tentative Agreement between the City of Antioch and the Confidential Unit; and 2) Authorizing the City Manager or designee to make any necessary adjustments to the Fiscal Year 2021/22 and 2022/23 budgets to implement the provisions of the Tentative Agreement.

RESOLUTION NO. 2022/71

On motion by Councilmember Ogorchock, seconded by Councilmember Barbanica the City Council unanimously adopted a resolution: 1) Approving the Tentative Agreement between the City of Antioch and the Confidential Unit; and 2) Authorizing the City Manager or designee to make any necessary adjustments to the Fiscal Year 2021/22 and 2022/23 budgets to implement the provisions of the Tentative Agreement.

10. RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE EMPLOYMENT

AGREEMENT WITH THOMAS LLOYD SMITH FOR CITY ATTORNEY SERVICES AND

AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE AGREEMENT

ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL

HOUSING SUCCESSOR
Regular Meeting
April 26, 2022 Page 10 of 13

Administrative Services Director Mastay presented the staff report dated April 26, 2022, recommending the City Council adopt a resolution approving the Fourth Amendment to the Employment Agreement with Thomas Lloyd Smith for City Attorney Services and authorizing the Mayor to sign the Agreement.

RESOLUTION NO. 2022/72

On motion by Councilmember Ogorchock, seconded by Councilmember Barbanica the City Council unanimously adopted a resolution approving the Fourth Amendment to the Employment Agreement with Thomas Lloyd Smith for City Attorney Services and au thorizing the Mayor to sign the Agreement.

11. TENTATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANTIOCH AND OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL UNION NO. 3 REPRESENTATIONAL UNIT IV FOR THE PERIOD OF OCTOBER 1, 2021 – SEPTEMBER 30, 2025

Administrative Services Director Mastay presented the staff report dated April 26, 2022, recommending the City Council adopt a resolution: 1) Approving the Tentative Agreement between the City of Antioch and Operating Engineers Local Union No. 3 Representational Unit IV (OE3); and 2) Authorizing the City Manager or designee to make any necessary adjustments to the Fiscal Year 2021/22 and 2022/23 budgets to implement the provisions of the Tentative Agreement.

RESOLUTION NO. 2022/73

On motion by Councilmember Ogorchock, seconded by Councilmember Barbanica the City Council unanimously adopted a resolution: 1) Approving the Tentative Agreement between the City of Antioch and Operating Engineers Local Union No. 3 Representational Unit IV (OE3); and 2) Authorizing the City Manager or designee to make any necessary adjustments to the Fiscal Year 2021/22 and 2022/23 budgets to implement the provisions of the Tentative Agreement.

ON MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER OGORCHOCK, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMB ER

BARBANICA, THE CITY COUNCIL UNANIMOUSLY SUSPENDED THE RULES AND MOVED COUNCIL REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS #15 AND 16 TO BE HEARD PRIOR TO COUNCIL REGULAR AGENDA ITEM #12

15. TENTATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANTIOCH AND THE MANAGEMENT UNIT FOR THE PERIOD OF OCTOBER 1, 2021 – SEPTEMBER 30, 2025

Administrative Services Director Mastay presented the staff report dated April 26, 2022, recommending the City Council adopt a resolution: 1) Approving the Tentative Agreement between the City of Antioch and the Management Unit; and 2) Authorizing the City Manager or designee to make any necessary adjustments to the Fiscal Year 2021/22 and 2022/23 budgets to implement the provisions of the Tentative Agreement.

ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL

HOUSING SUCCESSOR
Regular Meeting
April 26, 2022 Page 11 of 13

RESOLUTION NO. 2022/74

On motion by Councilmember Ogorchock, seconded by Councilmember Barbanica the City Council unanimously adopted a resolution: 1) Approving the Tentative Agreement between the City of Antioch and the Management Unit; and 2) Authorizing the City Manager or de signee to make any necessary adjustments to the Fiscal Year 2021/22 and 2022/23 budgets to implement the provisions of the Tentative Agreement.

16. TENTATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANTIOCH AND THE TREATMENT PLANT EMPLOYEES’ ASSOCIATION FOR THE PERIOD OF OCTOBER 1, 2021 – SEPTEMBER 30, 2025

Administrative Services Director Mastay presented the staff report dated April 26, 2022, recommending the City Council adopt a resolution: 1) Approving the Tentative Agreement between the City of Antioch and the Tre atment Plant Employees Association (TPEA); and 2) Authorizing the City Manager or designee to make any necessary adjustments to the Fiscal Year 2021/22 and 2022/23 budgets to implement the provisions of the Tentative Agreement.

RESOLUTION NO. 2022/75

On motion by Councilmember Ogorchock, seconded by Councilmember Barbanica the City Council unanimously adopted a resolution: 1) Approving the Tentative Agreement between the City of Antioch and the Treatment Plant Employees Association (TPEA); and 2) Authorizing the City Manager or designee to make any necessary adjustments to the Fiscal Year 2021/22 and 2022/23 budgets to implement the provisions of the Tentative Agreement.

12. RECRUITMENT SIGNING BONUS/INCENTIVES FOR QUALIFIED LATERAL AND

ACADEMY GRADUATE POLICE OFFICERS

Interim Chief Morefield presented the staff report dated April 26, 2022, recommending the City Council discuss and direct staff regarding modification of the City’s recruitment signing bonus/incentive program to include qualified lateral and academy graduate police officers.

Mayor Thorpe announced that he had requested this item be brought back.

Councilmember Barbanica stated he supported hiring more police officers and retaining the current policy. He noted the cost to increase the program was excessive and he wanted officers to work in Antioch because they chose to and not because of the incentives. He suggested the focus be on retention and building a great community within the Antioch Police Department.

Councilmember Torres -Walker stated she appreciated the report and noted that she would consider incentives for a limited time.

Mayor Thorpe explained that his proposal was a temporary measure.

ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL

HOUSING SUCCESSOR
Regular Meeting
April 26, 2022 Page 12 of 13

Councilmember Wilson stated she supported the current incentive program and looking at other incentive options.

Councilmember Ogorchock stated she did not want incentives to attract officers who would only be temporary. She expressed concern for the current police and community service officers who were not receiving an incentive to stay.

Mayor Thorpe commented that this policy could be used as a model for other city departments.

Following discussion, Council directed Mayor Thorpe to work with staff to develop a draft policy to bring back to Council for further discussion.

13. OVER HIRE OF SWORN POLICE OFFICERS

Interim Chief Morefield presented the staff report dated April 26, 2022, recommending the City Council discuss and direct staff regarding the over hire of sworn police officers.

Mayor Thorpe announced that he had requested this item be brought back.

Councilmember Ogorchock stated her preference would be to add ten officers to the 115 authorized positions.

Councilmember Torres -Walker stated she would support over hiring of ten officers and requested information regarding the fiscal impact.

Councilmember Barbanica stated he also supported adding 10 officers to the 115 authorized positions and a discussion regarding the fiscal impact.

Following discussion, Council directed Mayor Thorpe to work with staff to develop a policy to bring back to Council for consideration.

14. DISCUSSION ITEM: FORMATION OF THE PUBLIC SERVICES AND COMMUNITY

RESOURCES DEPARTMENT

City Attorney Smith presented the staff rep ort dated April 26, 2022, recommending the City Council provide direction including the following: 1) Whether staff should prepare an ordinance forming the Public Safety and Community Resources Department; and 2) If so, whether the ordinance should include a Public Safety Manager position or remain silent until later determination.

Councilmember Ogorchock commented that CDBG/Housing Consultant House as well as others had requested this department be named Public Services and Community Resources Department.

ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL

HOUSING SUCCESSOR
Regular Meeting
April 26, 2022 Page 13 of 13

Following discussion, Council consensus directed staff to not bring back an ordinance at this time.

PUBLIC COMMENT

Lacey Brown requested the City loo k for someone ot her than Focus Strategies to conduct a feasibility study for other Homekey project options. She discussed items she voluntarily provided to unhoused residents.

Lauren Posada, City Treasurer, thanked Council for their hard work. She discussed the resources needed by city departments to operate effectively. She asked Council to be mindful of the times and listen to the warnings. She expressed concern that staff reports this evening had not addressed fiscal impacts. She noted if Council was going to pivot what was underneath their umbrella, they should have conversations regarding what the results would be and determine funding sources upfront. She discussed the importance of determining priorities and outlining them in upcoming agenda packets.

STAFF COMMUNICATIONS – None

COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

Councilmember Torres-Walker thanked everyone who made public comments this evening and encouraged Council to put the needs of the community first. She requested staff agendize discussions regarding the following items: Antioch Police Department vehicle fleet , S olar installation at the Antioch Police Department and EV charging stations.

Councilmember Barbanica supported solar installation at city lots throughout Antioch. He suggested looking at distributing some of the ARPA funds to employees who remained and worked through COVID.

Councilmember Ogorchock supported discussions regarding the Antioch Police Department vehicle fleet and solar installation at City facilities.

ADJOURNMENT

On motion by Councilmember Ogorchock, seconded by Councilmember Barbanica the City Council unanimously adjourned the meeting at 11:16 P.M.

Respectfully submitted:

Kitty Eiden
KITTY EIDEN, Minutes Clerk

CITY COUNCIL MEETING

INCLUDING THE ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL

ACTING AS HOUSING SUCCESSOR

TO THE ANTIOCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY

Regular Meeting May 10, 2022
7:00 P.M. Council Chambers

6:00 P.M. - CLOSED SESSION

1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION – pursuant to California Government Code section 54956.9: Joshua Bickham v. City of Antioch et al.

United States District Court Northern District of California Case No. Case No. 3:21 -cv- 05017-SK.

2. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS – pursuant to California Government Code section 54957.6; City designated representatives: Nickie Mastay, Jazzman Brown, and Jeff Bailey; Employee organizations: Antioch Public Works Association, and Antioch Police Sworn Management Association.

7:00 P.M. REGULAR MEETING

Mayor Thorpe called the meeting to order at 7:0 1 P.M., and City Clerk Householder called the roll.

Present: Council/Agency Members District 1 Torres-Walker (attended via zoom), District 4 Wilson, Mayor Pro Tem (District 2) Barbanica and Mayor Thorpe

Absent: Council/Agency Member District 3 Ogorchock

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

Mayor Thorpe led the Pledge of Allegiance.

CITY ATTORNEY TO REPORT OUT ON CLOSED SESSION

City Attorney Smith reported the City Council had been in Closed Session and gave the following report: #1 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION, no reportable action; and #2 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS, no reportable action.

CITY ATTORNEY TO REPORT OUT ON CLOSED SESSION FROM MARCH 22, 2022

CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION – pursuant to California Government Code section 54956.9: Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company v. City of Antioch et al. Contra Costa County Superior Court Case No. Case No. MSC18 -00327, Council approved a settlement in the amount of $218,000.

1. INTRODUCTION OF NEW CITY EMPLOYEES
6B
06-14-22

ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL

HOUSING SUCCESSOR
Regular Meeting
May 10, 2022 Page 2 of 12

Interim City Manager Johnson introduced Dr. Steven Ford, Interim Police Chief who thanked Interim City Manager Johnson for the introduction.

Finance Director Merchant introduced Rashila Chaudhary, Finance Services Supervisor, who thanked Finance Director Merchant for the introduction.

Administrative Services Director Mastay introduced Jazzman Brown, Risk Manager , Pamela Siliezar and Lilia Barajas Lopez , Human Resources Technician s who thanked Administrative Services Director Mastay for the introduction.

Director of Public Works/City Engineer Samuelson introduced Gonzalo Ramos, Collection Systems Supervisor who thanked Director of Public Works/City Engineer Samuelson for the introduction and Matthew McCullough, Equipment Operator.

Director of Parks and Recreation Helfenberger introduced Shahad Wright, Recreation Supervisor who thanked Director of Parks and Recreation Helfenberger for the introduction.

Mayor Thorpe welcomed the new and newly promoted employees.

2. PROCLAMATIONS

Honoring Our Elders Month, May 2022
Be Kind to Animals Month, May 2022
Asian-American Pacific Islander Heritage Month, May 2022 National Public Works Week, May 15-21, 2022

On motion by Councilmember Wilson, seconded by Councilmember Barbanica the City Council members present unanimously approved the proclamations.

Adrianna and Trinity presented the Honoring Our Elders Month proclamation to Mr. Wilson who thanked the City of Antioch for the recognition and presented Mayor Thorpe with a t-shirt.

Animal Control Manager Harding on behalf of Barbara Sobalvarro accepted the Be Kind to Animals Month proclamation and thanked the City Council for the recognition.

Vy Vo, Contra Costa API Advocacy Coalition and another individual , accepted the Asian- American Pacific Islander Heritage Month proclamation and thanked the City C ouncil for the recognition.

Director of Public Works/City Engineer Samuelson and Public Works staff accepted the National Public Works Week proclamation and thanked the City Council for the recognition.

3. ANNOUNCEMENTS OF CIVIC AND COMMUNITY EVENTS

• ANTIOCH HISTORICAL SOCIETY HISTORY WALK – MAY 14, 2022

ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL

HOUSING SUCCESSOR
Regular Meeting
May 10, 2022 Page 3 of 12

• BLACK DIAMOND DAY – MAY 21, 2022

Mayor Thorpe announced that he would be giving the S tate of the City at 11:00 A.M. on May 11, 2022, at City Hall.

4. ANNOUNCEMENTS OF BOARD AND COMMISSION OPENINGS

City Clerk Householder announced the following Board and Commission openings.

➢ Sales Tax Citizens’ Oversight Committee
➢ Contra Costa Mosquito and Vector Control Board of Trustees

For more information and to apply, visit: www.bit.ly/ApplyAntioch or the City’s website.

PUBLIC COMMENTS

Due to the amount of speaker requests Mayor Thorpe reduced speaker times to one and a half minutes.

Patricia Granados spoke in support of the proclamations approved this evening. She expressed concern regarding comments made on The WTF California Podcast and Councilmembers who participated in discussions on that platform. She played a portion of a podcast and asked that anyone participating be investigated by the District Attorney and Department of Justice.

Romy Barrera expressed interest in starting a summer camp to provide children with jobs.

Edgar Martinez stated as a nonpartisan voter he received most of his local information from The WTF California Podcast. He discussed a s hooting that occurred on Delta View and expressed concern that he had clients who resided in the area.

Frank Sterling discussed the lack of media coverage in Antioch. He welcomed the newly hired employees. He thanked Councilmember Torres-Walker for attending the community speak out.

He encouraged the Antioch Police Department to cooperate with an investigation.

CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS/COMMUNICATIONS

Councilmember Torres-Walker reported on her attendance at the CDBG Committee, Community Violence Solutions Ad Hoc Committee and Cannabis Standing Committee meetings.

Councilmember Wilson reported on her attendance at T ri Delta and Cannabis Standing Committee meetings. She announced a Delta Diablo meeting would be held on May 11, 2022.

Councilmember Barbanica reported on his attendance at the CD BG Committee meeting. He thanked CDBG/Housing Consultant House and Councilmember Torres-Walker for their input.

ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL

HOUSING SUCCESSOR
Regular Meeting
May 10, 2022 Page 4 of 12

Mayor Thorpe reported on his attendance at Tri Delta Transit. He read a portion of his State of the City remarks in which he discussed Council’s accomplishments. He encouraged the community to focus on the facts and the work that had been completed in a collective process.

MAYOR’S COMMENTS

5. CONSENT CALENDAR for City /City Council Mem bers acting as Housing Successor to the Antioch Development Agency

A. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR APRIL 12, 2022

B. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES FOR APRIL 19, 2022

C. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR APRIL 26, 2022

D. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL WARRANTS

E. APPROVAL OF HOUSING SUCCESSOR WARRANTS

F. REJECTION OF CLAIMS: SUSANA SHIPPAM AND ISURU KARUNARATNE

G. RESOLUTION NO. 2022/76 AB 361: RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS NECESSARY

TO CONDUCT BROWN ACT MEETINGS BY TELECONFER ENCE FOR THE CITY

COUNCIL, BOARDS, COMMISSIONS, AND COMMITTEES

H. RESOLUTION NO. 2022/7 7 URGING CONTRA COSTA COUNTY TO ENACT

IMMEDIATE MEASURES TO PHASE OUT EXISTING OIL AND GAS OPERATIONS

ON COUNTY LANDS, AND TO PROHIBIT ANY NEW DRILLING

I. RESOLUTION N O. 2022/7 8 ARCTIC WOLF NETWORK ANNUAL CONTRACT

RENEWAL

J. RESOLUTION NO. 2022/7 9 SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO THE CONSULTING

SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH COASTLAND FOR ON -CALL CONSULTANT

INSPECTION SERVICES

K. RESOLUTION NO. 2022/ 80 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE HUNT AND SO NS

AGREEMENT TO INCREASE THE CONTRACT AMOUNT AND AMEND THE

AGREEMENT END DATE FOR THE PURCHASE GASOLINE AND DIESEL FUEL

L. RESOLUTION NO. 2022/ 81 PURCHASE OF NEW FURNITURE FOR THE PUBLIC

WORKS OFFICE REMODEL PROJECT

M. RESOLUTION NO. 2022/82 APPROVAL OF PURCHASE OF ONE (1) 2023 TEREX HI- RANGER XT PRO 56 TREE TRUCK ON A FORD F750 REGULAR CAB BASE

ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL

HOUSING SUCCESSOR
Regular Meeting
May 10, 2022 Page 5 of 12

UTILIZING SOURCEWELL COOPERATIVE PURCHASING CONTRACT NO. 110421 - TER WITH TEREX UTILITIES, INC.

N. APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 6 TO THE CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANTIOCH AND VOLER STRATEGIC ADVISORS AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT

On motion by Councilmember Wilson, seconded by Councilmember Barbanica, the City Council members present unanimously approved the Council Consent Calendar with the exception of items H and N which were removed for further discussion.

Item H – Harry Thurston, Antioch resident, Alexi Linderman, Sustainable Leaders in Action, Shoshana Wechsler, Frank Sterling and Ian Cohen spoke in sup port of Council adopting the resolution. Mr. Sterling requested Council stop the injection of wastewater near the drill site.

Luca Stuart-Chilcote took a neutral position on the resolution.

Councilmember Barbanica stated this item ha d been before Council three times and there had been no opposition from landowners, so he supported the resolution.

Councilmember Wilson spoke in support of this item and commended Alexi Linderman for organizing a march in support of a healthy environment.

On motion by Councilmember Wilson, seconded by Councilmember Barbanica the City Council members present unanimously approved item H.

Mayor Thorpe added that along with preventing the future drilling of gas and oil in Antioch, they had decommissioned an active pipeline, started replacing current vehicle fleets with zero emission vehicles, and were building a desalination plant. He noted they were stewarding the environment to protect it for future generations.

Item N – Interim City Manager Johnson stated he pulled this item so staff could review the agreement.

On motion by Councilmember Barbanica, seconded by Councilmember Wilson the City Council members present unanimously postponed Item N.

PUBLIC HEARING

6. INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE CREATING THE ANTIOCH POLICE OVERSIGHT

COMMISSION

City Attorney Smith presented the staff report dated May 10, 2022, recommending the City Council introduce the ordinance, waive the first reading, and read by title only the ordinance creating the Antioch Police Oversight Commission.

ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL

HOUSING SUCCESSOR
Regular Meeting
May 10, 2022 Page 6 of 12

Frank Sterling discussed incidents involving law enforcement and suggested survivors of police violence be included in the discussions. He urged Council to support the formation of the Antioch Police Oversight Commission. He suggested the City look into the Antioch Police Department hiring practices and initiate drug testing for officers.

Dr. Jeffrey Klingler, Antioch resident, spoke in support of a C itizens’ Police O versight Commission; however, he did not believe the ordinance was ready to move forward because it did not have consensus from the Police Oversight Standing Committee. He stated he would have liked to have seen the findings from staff regarding these types of Commissions. He offered suggested revisions to the Ordinance and requested this item be reagendized so a more robust hearing could be held.

Lucas Stuart -Chilcote, Harry Thurston, Antioch resident, Lacey Brown and Edgar Martinez spoke in support of the formation of the Antioch Police Oversight Commission.

Mayor Thorpe clarified government code as it pertain ed to a General Law City. He noted the Commission was advisory so any recommendations or policies would have to be codified by the City Council.

Councilmember Barbanica stated he believed they should give Interim Police Chief Ford more time in his position and get input from him prior to the formation of this Commission.

Councilmember Torres-Walker thanked everyone for their comments and City Attorney Smith for his research of this item. She noted it was an amazing process to be able to inform public policy and felt civilian oversight could potentially save lives. She spoke in support of including those with past convictions to local bodies because she believed attempting t o exclude them would be a disservice to democracy. She urged Council to pass the ordinance.

Councilmember Wilson stated she supported the formation of the Police Oversight Commission since it would allow the community to provide input in an advisory role.

Mayor Thorpe spoke in support of the formation of a Police Oversight Commission. He acknowledged Captain Morefield for bringing forward the public safety partnership. He reported Interim Chief Ford and Interim City Manager Johnson came from Police Department s that worked with Oversight Boards. He also noted City Attorney Smith was the Chair of the Oakland Oversight Commission therefore he believed current staff had the experience to manage an advisory Commission.

On motion by Councilmember Torres -Walker, seconded by Councilmember Wilson the City Council introduced the ordinance, waived the first reading , and read by title only the ordinance creating the Antioch Police Oversight Commission. The motion carried the following vote:

Ayes: Torres-Walker, Wilson, Thorpe Noes: Barbanica Absent: Ogorchock

ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL

HOUSING SUCCESSOR
Regular Meeting
May 10, 2022 Page 7 of 12

ON MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER BARBANICA, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER

WILSON THE CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT UNANIMOUSLY SUSPENDED THE RULES AND MOVED COUNCIL REGULAR AGENDA ITEM #9 TO BE HEARD AS THE NEXT ORDER OF BUSINESS. THE MOTION CARRIED THE FOLLOWING VOTE:

Ayes: Barbanica, Torres-Walker, Wilson, Thorpe Absent: Ogorchock

Mayor Thorpe declared a recess at 9:04 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 9:14 P.M. with all Councilmembers present with the exception of Councilmember Ogorchock who was previously noted as absent.

COUNCIL REGULAR AGENDA

9. RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PERMITTING UPDATE

Director of Community Development Ebbs presented the staff report dated May 10, 2022, recommending the City Council: 1) Receive the information on Recreational Vehicle Permits; and 2) Provide direction to staff.

Marlene Hartigan and Roshon Williams, Antioch resident, spoke in support of amending the Antioch Municipal Code (AMC) to allow recreational vehicles to be stored in front yards.

Michelle Barlow spoke in support of amending the AMC to allow recreation al vehicles to be stored in the front yard or expanding the registration process.

Richard spoke in support of continuing the current process.

Mayor Thorpe thanked the speakers for their comments.

In response to Councilmember Barbanica, Director of Community Development Ebbs stated that given the City’s resources, amending the AMC to eliminate restrictions would have the highest chance of successful enforcement.

Councilmembers Barbanica and Torres-Walker spoke in support of amending the AMC to eliminate the restrictions which would allow recreational vehicles to be stored in front yards.

In response to Councilmember Wilson, Director of Community Development Ebbs explained that the options to allow recreational vehicles and expand registration process required an ordinance amendment to include clear standards for lawfully storing an RV in the front yard. He noted the question was whether Council wanted to move forward with a new permitting process and fees.

He commented that a 5-year sunset on permits could address tracking issues.

Mayor Thorpe stated his only concern was if a permitting process would fit into the workflow of Code Enforcement. He suggested a new registration process with a minimal fee and height/size restrictions could be considered.

ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL

HOUSING SUCCESSOR
Regular Meeting
May 10, 2022 Page 8 of 12

Director of Community Development Ebbs suggested continuing the process and bringing forward some of the regulations for a permitting system and a process that would allow RVs by right. He noted Council could then decide on how to move forward.

Council consensus supported staff coming back to Council with models and based on those they could inform an ordinance as to how they wanted to move forward.

Director of Community Development Ebbs reported the City would not enforce the RV permit registration element of the ordinance until this item was resolved.

Councilmember Torres-Walker suggested staff bring back a more affordable option for residents.

Mayor Thorpe stated he wanted what was brought back to be as close to an ordinance as possible so it could be adopted at the following meeting.

PUBLIC HEARING – Continued

7. ORDINANCE AND MILITARY EQUIPMENT POLICY (#706) PURSUANT TO ASSEMBLY BILL 481

Interim Chief Ford and Captain Morefield presented the st aff report dated May 10, 2022, recommending the City Council introduce, waive the first reading, and read by title only, the Ordinance adopting a Military Equipment Policy pursuant to Assembly Bill 481.

Mayor Thorpe opened and closed the public hearing with no members of the public requesting to speak.

8. PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDMENT OF SECTION 4-

5.411.1(C) OF THE ANTIOCH MUNICIPAL CODE AUTHORIZING ENFORCEMENT OF

THE CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE TO PRIVATELY OWNED ROADS WITHIN THE LAUREL RANCH SUBDIVISION (P.W. 698)

Director of Public Works/City Engineer Samuelson presented the staff report dated May 10, 2022, recommending the City Council introduce, waive the first reading, and read by title only, the proposed Ord inance Amendment of Section 4 -5.411.1(C) of the Antioch Municipal Code authorizing enforcement of the California Vehicle Code to Privately Owned Roads within the Laurel Ranch Subdivision.

Mayor Thorpe opened and closed the public hearing with no members of the public requesting to speak.

ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL

HOUSING SUCCESSOR
Regular Meeting
May 10, 2022 Page 9 of 12

On motion by Councilmember Wilson, seconded by Councilmember Barbanica the City Council members present unanimously introduced, waived the first reading, and read by title only, the proposed Ordinance Amendment of Section 4-5.411.1(C) of the Antioch Municipal Code authorizing enforcement of the California Vehicle Code to Privately Owned Roads within the Laurel Ranch Subdivision.

COUNCIL REGULAR AGENDA – Continued

10. UNHOUSED RESIDENT SERVICES – FALL 2022 CYCLE STATE OF CALIFORNIA HOMEKEY PROGRAM AND EXECUTIVE INN LOCATED AT 515 EAST 18TH STREET

Assistant City Manager Bayon Moore presented the staff report dated May 10, 2022, recommending the City Council receive the presentation and adopt the resolution: 1) Authorizing the City to pursue State of California Homekey Program funding for housing opportunities associated with the Executive Inn located at 515 East 18th Street; 2) Pledging the 5-year City commitment of a subsidy estimated at $12.3 million dollars in l ocal funds; and 3) Authorizing pursuit of the public procurement process to identify an experienced developer partner to assist with financing, development, long term ownership and operations of the future Homekey site.

Katie Felch and Edgar Martinez yielded their time to Andrew Becker.

Andrew Becker announced he had provided Council with documents from the City of Antioch’s Housing Element. He discussed the opportunity that existed on the Delta Fair site and requested Council consider other opportunities. He expressed concern that discussion s regarding other possibilities for round 2 of Homekey funding had not occurred.

Councilmember Barbanica applauded the City’s efforts; however, he felt allocating $82K for 30 rooms, per year, was not a good use of taxpayer money.

Councilmember Wilson stated she believed it was time to assist unhoused residents and noted that she was opened to discuss other possibilities in Antioch.

Councilmember Torres-Walker stated she had been clear regarding her concerns about this project. She noted that it would cost less to be proactive and move forward with this proposal.

She also noted that she wanted to look at other opportunities.

Mayor Thorpe discussed the ongoing costs associated with addressing the unhoused. He noted investing $12M a year would house several people and potentially move them to permanent housing. He reminded Council that $12M would be the cost if the City did not pursue Homekey funding. He supported moving forward with this item.

RESOLUTION NO. 2022/83

On motion by Councilmember Wilson , seconded by Councilmember Torres -Walker the City Council adopted the resolution: 1) Authorizing the City to pursue State of California Homekey

ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL

HOUSING SUCCESSOR
Regular Meeting
May 10, 2022 Page 10 of 12

Program funding for housing opportunities associated with the Executive Inn located at 515 East 18th Street; 2) Pledging the 5 -year City commitment of a subsidy estimated at $12.3 million dollars in local funds; and 3) Authorizing pursuit of the public procurement process to identify an experienced developer partner to assist with financing, dev elopment, long term ownership and operations of the future Homekey site. The motion carried the following vote:

Ayes: Torres-Walker, Wilson, Thorpe Noes: Barbanica Absent: Ogorchock

11. UNHOUSED RESIDENT SERVICES – PURSUIT OF ADDITIONAL HOUSING

SOLUTIONS, INCLUDING THE HOMEKEY PROGRAM AND OTHER FUNDING

OPPORTUNITIES

Assistant City Manager Bayon Moore presented the staff report dated May 10, 2022, recommending the City Council discuss and provide direction to City staff.

Councilmember Torres-Walker stated this item was important because it would give the City the opportunity to consider additional sites for temporary housing solutions with resources that would allow the unhoused to transition into permanent housing. She noted the hope was that they could have an RFP for city-owned parcels suitable to submit a second application for Homekey funding or future potential funding opportunities.

Mayor Thorpe reported that he along with Councilmember Torres -Walker met with staff and Focus Strategies and learned there were other opportunities that had a longer timeline through the state, to seek additional funding. He commented that he wanted to remain mindful of staff’s capacity.

Katie Felch, Edgar Martinez and Lindsey Amezcua yielded their time to Andrew Becker.

Andrew Becker spoke in support of pursuing additional opportunities for housing solutions and the City selecting an independent project manager, to work on an application.

Councilmember Barbanica , Wilson and Councilmember Torres -Walker supported exploring additional options for housing solutions.

Councilmember Wilson expressed concern for staff capacity.

Councilmember Torres-Walker commented that she felt the City needed to act with a sense of urgency as requested by the community.

Mayor Thorpe suggested Council be specific with regards to what areas they were interested in looking into for housing options.

Councilmember Torres-Walker stated the community had voiced their support for exploring the Delta Fair site since there was sufficient infrastructure on the property.

ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL

HOUSING SUCCESSOR
Regular Meeting
May 10, 2022 Page 11 of 12

Assistant City Manager Bayon Moore reported in discussions with F ocus Strategies there was value placed in identifying city owned properties as well as other properties within the city limits so an RFP could be structured to encourage the private sector to examine the potential of certain parcels. She suggested as a follow-up they could return to the City Council with a report on how they proposed to structure the RFP with the intent of ma ximizing the quality and potential of a partner to work with the City.

Councilmember Torres-Walker thanked Assistant City Manager Bayon Moore and suggested the process start with the City’s Housing Element document which provided details on city owned sites.

Councilmember Barbanica stated he was open for exploring options and talking with community groups such as the Delta Veterans.

Assistant City Manager Bayon Moore added that the benefit of coming back to Council was that if the city also wished to augment the RFP with a pledge of financial support, it could be included in the document.

Following discussion, Council directed staff to come back with a proposal to structure an RFP for additional opportunities.

12. FORMATION OF A HUMAN RIGHTS AND RACIAL EQUITY AD HOC COMMITTEE

City Attorney Smith presented the staff report dated May 10, 2022, recommending the City Council take the following actions: 1) Determine if the City Council wishes to form a Human Rights and Racial Equity Ad Hoc Committee for the purposes described in the resolution; 2) Confirm the appointment of two (2) members for the Human Rights and Racial Equity Ad Hoc Committee; 3) Confirm the duration of the Human Rights and Racial Equity Ad Hoc Committee; and 4) Adopt the resolution forming the Human Rights and Racial Equity Ad Hoc Committee.

RESOLUTION NO. 2022/84

On motion by Councilmember Barbanica, seconded by Councilmember Wilson the City Council Members present unanimously a dopted the resolution forming the Human Rights and Racial Equity Ad Hoc Committee appointing Mayor Thorpe and Councilmember Torres -Walker for a duration of 6-months.

13. DISCUSSION ITEM: FORMATION OF THE PUBLIC SERVICES AND COMMUNITY

RESOURCES DEPARTMENT

City Attorney Smith presented the staff report dated May 10, 2022, recommending the City Council provide direction whether staff should prepare an ordinance forming the Public Safety and Community Resources Department.

ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL

HOUSING SUCCESSOR
Regular Meeting
May 10, 2022 Page 12 of 12

Following discussion, Council consensus directed staff to prepare an ordinance forming the Public Safety and Community Resources Department.

PUBLIC COMMENT

Lacey Brown expressed concern regarding discussions that occurred between staff and homeless advocates. She requested action be taken regarding this matter.

STAFF COMMUNICATIONS – None

COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

Councilmember Torres-Walker announced it was Mental Health Awareness Month and she was looking forward to a presentation from the Antioch Police Department on officer wellness at the Police Oversight Committee meeting. She announced May 12, 2022, was her 40th birthday and she was blessed. She encouraged others who woke up this morning to consider that they were blessed with the opportunity every day to do it over again.

ADJOURNMENT

On motion by Councilmember Barbanica, seconded by Councilmember Wilson the City Council unanimously adjourned the meeting at 10:37 P.M.

Respectfully submitted:

Kitty Eiden
KITTY EIDEN, Minutes Clerk

C
06-14-22

STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE:

TO:

Regular Meeting of June 14, 2022
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
SUBMITTED BY: Christina Garcia, CMC, Deputy City Clerk
APPROVED BY:

SUBJECT:

RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council continue the Meeting Minutes of May 24, 2022.

FISCAL IMPACT
None

DISCUSSION
N/A

ATTACHMENT
None.

Cg
Nickie Mastay, Administrative Services Director
City Council Meeting Minutes of May 24, 2022
t0
___D___

E
Agenda Item #

STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

DATE: Regular Meeting of June 14, 2022

TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council

SUBMITTED BY: Thomas Lloyd Smith, City Attorney TLS

SUBJECT: REJECTION OF CLAIM: MARY BARKER

RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council reject the claim submitted by Mary Barker.

Should the City Council desire to discuss these matters, it would be scheduled for a future closed session.

ATTACHMENTS
None.

F
06-14-22

STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

DATE: Regular Meeting of June 14, 2022

TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council

SUBMITTED BY: Lauren Posada, City Treasurer

SUBJECT: Approval of Treasurer’s Report for March of 2022

RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council receive and file the March 2022 Treasurer’s Report.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact of this action.

DISCUSSION
The City’s Statement of Investment Policy (Policy) requires that the City Treasurer render, at least quarterly, an investment report to the Cit y Council. The Policy also requires a monthly report of investment transactions to City Council. A monthly Treasurer’s Report is provided with both reporting provisions of the Policy.

ATTACHMENTS
A. City Treasurer’s Report

USTreasury
S3s,190,147
US/National Agency
CAMP

CITY OF ANTIOCH

SUMMARY REPORT ON THE CITY'S INVESTMENTS
March 31,2022
C.ommercial paper
Fiscal Agent
lnvestments
s146,014
tAIF
Security
$9,452,329
Market
s4l,t9t,7t4
of
Deposit
S1,600,000
Finance Director
$u,
Total of City and Fiscal Agent lnvestmenls = $161,939,35g All city investments are shown above and conform to the city lnvestment poricy. All investment transactions during this period are included in this report. As Treasurer of the city of h;tio;h and Finanie Director ;i16";ffi;i;iffi: ;" hereby certifu that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipateJ rerenue are available to meet the next six (6) months, estimated expenditures.

Lauren
City Treasu
6t3t2022 Prepared by: Finance Department-Accounting Division Page 1 Amount
Antioch Public Financing Authority 2015 Bonds 1
Antioch Development Agency 2009 Tax Allocation Bonds 146,013 $146,014
Summary of Fiscal Agent Balances by
Debt Issue

!
"

#$%#&$'((
$#'$$
'
'

!"##

$$

)

*
'
$#'$$ +
,

- "

%&
!

#$#./&' #$%#&$'((

!"##

' #
"((

""
! &

()* +)(

#
&$

'(
! )
17820".0 !.! #
;

'
01!".7 0.!1

&
'
$+
77708. .!3
+
2"778.80 ".!
;+
01.!" .0
6
6%3

0!278.2" ".1

&
'

#
;

780".!" 7.70

3 &
$+
7"".1 ".7!

&
'

#
;

'
70"88.27 7.23
#+

&
'
$+
8!7"208.7 .7<..)
'
$+
"7"80.11 .8! &
!722.1 1.189
&
'(

*+,-.,-/0
/1
)2

! &
"

'(
!)2

%
#
""

8".2 10 !8!.0
& "."" " 7"80.11
9
&
'(
"."" !722.1
*,/3 *+,-.,-/0

!
&%

4!
5
6"

"

7 )2

'(
! )
71"!7.
".""
817.!
21077.1
202.!!
227!8.1"
08822"7."2
!10778.28
71872.0
7"".1
.87
".""
".2
".27
7.80
!.01
"."
8.!8
.70
".7!
<
"

'
8"

'
81"

'
1"

''

7'

7'

2'

20'

0'

*+,-.,-/0
,
/1
8
"#%&
!
&

!.!=
0.!1=

'
$
+
.!=
3
+
".!=

;+
.0=
6%3

".1=

&
'

#
;

7.70=

$+
".7!=

'
7 2=
3
#+

&

'
$+
.7=
<)*
$+
.8!=
&

1.18=
9
&
'
(

)

#
$"
%&
&
'"
!
"
%(
%)
*

%( !'
*

!

& +

''

& +

,
#
-"
./'

& .0
'"

( %)
*

!'
*

'
."

%"

%

'
("

"1,

'
.,/"

,
#
-"
./'

"#$ #% %&$'((
2 3456
2
7554
6
78587458
879848

2853
584886
"#% )$ )'%
7879485
2877384756
28476
" $
'&

379347
8774
788
8478

345

7745
2797
456
23
987476
28 384836

"&# '#

*+
"

-"

:

"

'
("
';

'
("
)
(

"

%"

*+

!

!' '

" "'

"
<

/'
1
'"

'
("

"1,
( % %)
*

',
/"

'

"

%"

!

4

755
45

7745

345
2787
346
77843
4

"
'

''
&(
%

./

.
.+ *+0
-

:4/4" 1+
%

4 795
7485 4

/(""
"

'1+
% 535
4 5
7745 5 437

'
("
+
% 59
4 57
8849 5499

"

'1
"
+"'=
/'
1 974

85843 4

"

'1,,'
"

"
+"'=
/'
1
88
75483 88
9574 8458

"

'1+
% 834 8
39485 8348
(" 55784 55588
7488 5483

.
'".)(
874 8
3849 8477
+" = 5
4 55747
4

+"'=
/'
1 3
58949 357
48
3479

1! #(
#( &
$'&( #% )$ )'%

2 ''
8774
./
#(
#( &
$'&( #% #&#

'

3 )&

)&
$'%

3479>
+/
4
>
+" =
8477>
.)(

5483>
("
8348>

1+
%

4>

1+/
8458>

"

'1
,,'
"

"
+"'=

/'
1
5499>

+
%
5437>
/(""
"

'1+
%
4
>
://+
%
7 785 85" 5" " " *
"
47>
45
>
745>
945>
4>
4>
4>

0

1

"
1"

"
1""=
?

*"
)"1 "
1 997
499>
545>
''
&(
%

4

5
6.

48>

543>
@
7473>

49
>
8
435>
8@
547>

7848>
@
548>

884>

54>
+++@
543>
!
4
.
/7

4
*+
57994
4++&+!!
/
38943 4&&:!

-+&
/!:/
85394

848A4
989
4 49

!
B
!
//
9394
49
!)
597834 453

&

9945
4
/!A

&
8593574 84+C
!
73
8949
47+?&/
!-
/&&
83743 48
+?-
&
?
!!:/
354
48+!/&
!//D:++
55794 45+:!&$!
!/

54 4
&!)

!
?
!!
/:!
/
833543 45&!
!D:C
:!
858749 84
&
&!

3
87843 433!B:?
!!:/

7
4 49
!
&&!
53
547 4!&
//?+

994
3 4

-!!
!
78
84
498$!:

7
934 45/!

9843
49
!
)/://
$!:
!C
9553459 49
)

!
E

5
8539495 457)/-
!&/
!-
/
99549
435)+/
554 45
BB+&!

73438 74

78749 4
!):!:/
55884 45&!)/
+!))!

8949 4
!)!
):?
!!:/
89
874
3 84
!
))

7
3943 473$

!&)/!

''
&(
%

4

.
/7

4
*+
998849 4
$&/:
!:+&
!:/

59848 4
9$&&
/$!:/
958849 499$&)//$!:

3
4 4
8$$&

87
4 48
!&
)-)/!&
!:/
5
74 45

!/

939954 4
)

58
49 47):!

-+&
/

934

4

?
&&
!&
73349 4
!
&)/!

3

4
84:):!

-+&
/

9784
4+!

8
384 847
!
!)
-
&

+C
87943 847&+C!
/!:))
-
8
7548
843F
!$/
E
858943 84C:+!
)?
!!:/
834 47&C

)!!

55374 45&/$
&
/:&&
$
)/!
8558473 48
!
)
/+
A:&
/
!:/
5
8849 457
!
)
/+
A:!

-+&
/
55
8743 45
!CE

7974
4
3!$/&

5743 4&!:!&:&
/
!

87949 4

/&
/
89
43 483
?F
!/
:!
C
:!
5
45 47
?!C/:!+)
-
&

!

87
74
48
//:!

-+&
/
5
5945 47
!&!

55747
4

&/
!-
/$!:

555745 4
!B!
9
4
4
!++C
)
!&)
857399433 84!'

$
3384 48/

:
''
&(
%

"
&

4

.
/7

4
*+
7
8374 43/
!&)
955873488 49
/
/!

!
!

9
848 49!$
!

994
4
+C
?!C
&&!
!
5

47 4571"&" 0
83
48 84
!!

74 4
!:/!

5755848 459:&
-
!
&
795
7485 4:
)/
/!
/:!
88
94 4:
)
&$!:

37
77548 848-
!A?
!!:/

875475 4
?!&):!
!:/
"#% )$ )'%

2 ''
&(
%

"
%

0
/

7

008-
8
34.

0 0 4
+

-80
-

6. 9 ,

:
; *
.
3''
8<
:/!
/:!
/
))5%8
%55849
>5%8
%55
77934957
543888845778534%%5%5%5""@7 43855A7 49
:/!
/:!
/
))%8%587845
>9%8%55

3949948
37849
84
%5%58
%57%58""@743855/35 487
:/!
/:!
/
))3%%55845
>3%%55
5
34 533794
8945375488%7%588%8%58""@5
43855)7 45
:/!
/:!%+
/
))8%8%55849
>8%8%55
5
7548584
5947874888%%5888%8%58""@
43855)) 4
5 :/!
/:!
/
))88%8
%5545
>88%8
%55
537498
5854833574
8
34785%%585%8%5""@8
43855?8 455
:/!
/:!
/
))8%8
%558485
>8%8
%55

84
989833445587338
45%%585%5%58""@89
43855+
48
:/!
/:!
/
))5%8
%558485
>5%8
%55
38553743848
89475395485%5
%585%5%58""@3
43855+5 455
:/!
/:!
/
))5%8
%558485
>5%8
%55
5885794
583348784
583743%%58%8%58""@5543855+5 459 :/!
/:!
/
))
%8%58954>%%55
984799
5439753499574%
%58%8%58""@9
43855B9 49
:/!
/:!%+
/
))7%8
%55845
>7%8
%55
57554
5348495
7457%5%587%55%58""@5743855$ 4

:/!
/:!%+
/
))7%8
%55845
>7%8
%55
5755854
597789475543
5958794399%9%589%8%58""@59
43855$ 49
:/!
/:!%+
/
))9%8
%55849
>9%8
%55
3759
4
833
54343
833347%3%58%
%58""@
543855& 4
:/!
/:!%+
/
))9%8
%55849
>9%8
%55

394
335
4994
733
49%8%58%3%58""@343855& 48
:/!
/:!%+
/
))9%8
%55849
>9%8
%55
8
8
845

37485495

39477%7%58%%58""@
43855& 4
''
&(
%

"
$

0
/

7

008-
8
34.

0 0 4
+

-80
-

6. 9 ,

:
; *
.
3''
8<
:/!
/:!%+
/
))%8
%55849
>%8
%55
89
948833849
85498393743%%583%8%58""@88438557 48 :/!
/:!%+
/
))3%8
%55849
>3%8
%55
83483358549374983389
48%7%588%8%58""@543855B9 4
8 :/!
/:!
/
))8%8%58384
>8%8%55
535774884783
483
948
%7%58
%%58""@438557 4
:/!
/:!
/
))88%%58384
>88%%55
9935
455
453584353349
7%89%587%8
%58""@43855-7 4
:/!
/:!
/
))88%%58384
>88%%55
89734893395948
93498838487%9%587%5%58""@89
43855-7 45
:/!
/:!%+
/
))85%8
%55884>85%8
%55
37394
333
485334
733353748%
%558%%55""@843855) 845
:/!
/:!%+
/
))8%8
%5558485
>8%8
%55

837
845
83
43354958345%%555%8%55""@8
43855)/9 843
$& %#&')( $ )

&%$'
( #$ &$')#
'&
(
%) ))'&(
%%

-1!
-!<

8<
&+C!
))
-
))%5%5584857>%5%55
7
5
747759
4394977754
%5%58%8%58""77
4
3
F-7 45

!
!)
-
&+C
/
))%5%554
>
%5%55
7
7
747738
4338895433779943%5%5%89%5""77
4
8B)9 4
8 &+C!
E)
-
&

/
))88%5%5545
>88%5%55
78884877354

34377

34 88%5%588%89%5""794
3
F7 45

!
!)
-
&+C
/
))3%5%5584
>3%5%55
9
4
354878549358
4 3%5%583%8
%58""35
4
8B)A 4
5

&'&

(%
$$'&

#

(&'

'&
#

)
'%
#
%

-1!

-
8<
''
&(
%

"
)

0
/

7

008-
8
34.

0 0 4
+

-80
-

6. 9 ,

:
; *
.

-
8<
/
!D:C
:B+&!
-
+)/
))88%5%558459>9%8%555
83
35438347483488%5%588%8%5!!834889F 84
/:!+)
-!
B+&!
-+)/
))85%5%554>%8
%55
5888458
4
4958
485%5%585%87%5!@58
47
7)! 4
/B+&$+)/
))7%88%5554>9%8%55
33848548

48
3947%88%5
%53%5"@845995CF-5 84
&/$
&
/)B+&$+)/
))88%8%554>%8%55
553745
489435
488%8%58%%5""@5
4
3 4
)/B+&$+)/
))%
%5548>%8%55
7
83749
454
9
4%
%59%5%5""9
4
983
48
/)

?!!
/?!//B+&!
-
+)/
))%7%5548>85%8%55

54
47584
4%7%59%%5"8
4879?!5 48
/:!+)
-!
B+&!
-+)/
))85%5%55475>%8
%55
7887794574897477485%5%585%87%5!@747 7)/5 475
F:!
C
:!B+&!
-+)/
))5%%558439>8%8%55

89
4383
4945383
45%%588%55%58883
4778) 43
&/+!))B+&!
-+)/
))3%87%55845
>9%8%55

558845
49345
43%87%53%%5"5
48598)7 8457
$&('&
$%
')

)%
&&'%
'$#
)% %#)'

-1!
=

!*

+78
))8%8%584>%8%5
858435738459734
55747%89%58%%58""@974

8F3):5 54

)$#'%

'#(
$ #('
&
'%
(

$'$
) (
$'%%
-1!
=

!*

''
&(
%

"
(

0
/

7

008-
8
34.

0 0 4
+

-80
-

6. 9 ,

:
; *
.
=

!*

&:&&/!::!
)

))88%8%58
54987>7%8%555
87838549878394
774987898743%8%83%8%83""@8783894
89+&:!9 5497
&:&&/!::!
)

))85%8%58554

>9%8%555
533
4533
8849
9478
5477%89%837%85%83""@533584589-B5 545
&:&&/!::!
)

))
%8%5854
8>88%8%555
9

4539
74894
9
34%87%83%8%83""@9

74589+8+/ 843
5895
))
%8%58545>85%8%555
88

94888
8743584
88
98473%87%833%88%83""@8833743887
$D 54
5895
))
%8%58545>85%8%555
8
58488
5974
35348
534533%3%833%%83""@8
54
987
$D 847
/C

))85%8%5845>9%8%55
8394883594975348983594985%89%885%9%8""@835949989CC3 45 /CF598
))88%8%5835435>9%8%55
55834355549475555943888%57%8388%5%83""@5554389D- 543
&('
% %) &
$'&
%( %%'

'$ $$ #%'

%$ (
'#
-1!
=

8<
!
))

/
))%5%5549
>%5%55
58733345839845734
583
4%5%5%89%5""@55489

D 47
!
))

/
))
%9%5549
>
%
%55
3
754

3
54984933
9747%%57%%5""@3
489

!7 4

!
))

/
))
%9%5549
>
%
%55
87
94 87
9745
5
874387
43
%9%5
%
%5""@87

489

!7 43

/
))
%55%5545
>
%55%55
3543594954735547%%57%%5""@35 48
$D 47

/
))
%55%5545
>
%55%55
898545
8993348
7949889954

%55%5
%5%5""@89
48
$D 4

!
))

/
))7%57%5545
>7%57%55
8
78943878
8478749
878
573477%57%57%5%5""@875489

/ 4

''
&(
%

"
#

0
/

7

008-
8
34.

0 0 4
+

-80
-

6. 9 ,

:
; *
.
=

8<

/
))9%8%5545
>9%8%55
88
49899943999489

48%%58%9%5""@89
48
$
$ 457

/
))9%8%5545
>9%8%55
89
99478937848834738938849
9%8%59%%5""@893
48
$
$ 45
!
))

/
))%58%5545
>%5%55
75854733
4
8934773374%57%5%5
%5""@9489

-9 4
!
))

/
))%58%5545
>%5%55
855948593
43594788597334
%58%5%83%5""@859
489

-9 45
!
))

/
))3%%5545
>3%%55
98
8479
748588949
84553%%53%5%5""@9
489

?
45
!
))

/
))3%%5545
>3%%55
8834887874
87488778
4 3%%53%5%5""@887
489

?
457
!
))

/
))3%%5545
>3%%55
857
48533934359478533
48%%58%9%5""@8489

?
457
!
))

/
))85%%5545
>85%%55
8
34398

834785748

85%%585%5%5""@8

489
5 45
% ('$ ( %(# )
'
( #(( (&)'

'( #)
$&%'%)#

-1!
-<

-!!
!
!

/
))
%88%558488>
%88%55
85
594784
97484
%88%5
%9%5"58487797+-8 848

&
!
!

/
))
%88%5549
>
%88%55
59783459398488747959354
%88%5
%%5""@549)-3 4
$

!&)/!

/
))
%88%5849
>
%8
%55
57
745
549849
97549

%8%5
%88%55
473

+)3 845
A4!
!

/
))7%%554>7%%55
79874
9949755499
47%%57%8%589
458
+
4

''
&(
%

0
/

7

008-
8
34.

0 0 4
+

-80
-

6. 9 ,

:
; *
.
-<

!&!
!
!

/
))7%%554>7%%55
9
938493
498493
49 7%%57%8%58@9
47398!D5 4

-!!

))7%5%584838>7%5%55
535
945534797
487
745
5%59%55%5
%5"55
487797 8475
!!
)!
!
!

/
))
%57%5584
>%5
%55
8
74
8339743554
8334

%57%5
%5%58@8
43577 847
$&)//$!:
!
!

/
))88%83%554759>88%89%55
598

43 59
478459
488%83%588%87%55+++@59
488$B& 47
F)

!

&!
!
!

/
))%%5584
>8%89%55
77
9
949793845
84 93945%%58%8%5854555
-7 4
+!

/
))5%85%58475
>5%85%55
8
5354
8
95749488
738488%8%5888%87%588
4
35: 433
+!

/
))5%85%58475
>5%85%55

8487747384585393348%7%58%5%54 35: 475
&
+
!

/
))%59%58749
>5%5
%55
3
4393488748
83
84 85%5%5888%%58"5@9
4593C+ 4
$&)//!

/
))%%584>%%55
55374
535
4894548%5
%588%58%585+++@55
488$- 479
!&
//?+!

/
2&&+&
6 ))%8%55849
>%8%55
53

5475333849845
533
4%8%58%87%5854
8+ 499
/!
2&&+&
6!
!

/
))8%
%5849>%8
%55
7

9348
47
88457994
%88%5
%9%545! 845
A4!
!

/
))
%85%5584
>
%85%55
9579948887847887478848
%85%58
%8%5888
458
+?
4

''
&(
%

0
/

7

008-
8
34.

0 0 4
+

-80
-

6. 9 ,

:
; *
.
-<
$!:
2&&+&
6!
!

/
))
%8%558479>
%8
%55
3

4

84787437
85
4 8%7%58%5%5+++@
4895379!3 43
$!:
2&&+&
6!
!

/
))
%8%558479>
%8
%55
539
8844838494
%8%5
%9%5+++@4895379!3 847
:
)
&$!:
2&&+&
6
!

))
%83%5584

>
%8
%55
88

9459748579
4557754
%83%58
%89%58@5
4385

+ 4
3
!
&&!&/
!-
!
!

/
))
%89%5584
>
%89%55

7
49
49793
47974

%89%58
%8%5859
4838!5& 4

/!A

&&2&&+&
6
!

))
%5%55849>
%5%55
9
945
337943988433

4

%5%58
%5
%583
4779 49
!
&)/!

/2&&+&
6 ))7%%55847
>7%%55
7334938784559
47338
4 %8%55%8%558
4
5$
5485
F)

!

&!
!
!

/
))7%8%5584
>7%9%55
85
74958538478
45 85394
7%8%587%9%58584555
-D3 43
!$
!
!
!

/
))7%57%584
>9%8%55

9
8487394754
9835488%53%5888%5%585
49785
+)9 84
+C
!!

/
))9%5%5847>9%5%55
888
3488
875499534988
48%8%53%5%55847
8$&7 84

+C
!!

/
))9%5%5847>9%5%55
55979435989848875455
754
%5
%5%58%5555
47
8$&7 849
+!/&
!//D:++!

/
2&&
))8%57%55543>9%57%55
8
9 974
8797478748733478%9%58%
%55@8
7488855 473
''
&(
%

0
/

7

008-
8
34.

0 0 4
+

-80
-

6. 9 ,

:
; *
.
-<

!
B
!
//!

/
2&&+&
))9%%58354
>9%%55
3
5954859
43873485488%5%5888%83%585+++@45 87$5 848

!&!
!
!

/
))%3%5584
>%3%55
5
8
974875794
8384357
743%3%58%%588@57
47398!! 4
5
!)
!
!

/
))3%3%55849
>%3%55
575
854
59
4595394355984
3%3%583%9%5859
4577
?) 499
:&
-
!
&!
2&&+&
6
!
!
))%85%5584757>%85%55
3

54379
4
45837
3345%5%555%55%558@84397+7 54

:&
-
!
&!
2&&+&
6
!
!
))%85%5584757>%85%55
877
94989
48348889
4%85%58%3%588@89
4397+7 47
+?:/
&&&!
!

/
))%85%55849
>%85%55
83

4753
47534595384

%85%58%3%5855
4

7 +: 49

$&)//$!:
!
!

/
))7%8%55847
9>3%8%55
58
73845
5
43
485
47%8%587%9%585+++@5
488$
477
!!
)!
!
!

/
))3%8%558475
>3%8%55
59
794
533439485354
3%8%583%%588@5
4357F7 47

/&
&)$/!

/
2&&+&
))3%8%558477>3%8%55

87 949

48

437

43%8%583%9%58"

47875: 478
+C
!!
2&&+&
6
!
!
))8%58%5548>8%5%55

3849
48799439
48%58%58%87%559
47
8$F 48
''
&(
%

0
/

7

008-
8
34.

0 0 4
+

-80
-

6. 9 ,

:
; *
.
-<

!
-
!++C:!
!

/
))8%85%555849
>8%8%55

9

4
375
4588
473748%5%558%83%55"5@
4587/8 847

!)
!
!

/
))8%8%55584
>8%8%55

8
3
4337488875
4337
48%8%558%88%55
4577
?

84
&)
%2&&+&
6!
!

/
))5%
%58
547
>5%
%55

55
574553784
83495539
45 %%55%%5555
49

+ 548
&!:!&:&
!
!

/
))5%9%555849
>5%9%55

85
9747585
43
84 78594
5%5%555%55%55585
4798 545
&!:!&:&
!
!

/
))5%9%555849
>5%9%55

59
945583347747358334

5%9%558%8%55558
4798 84

!CE!

/
))5%8%58
549
>5%8%55

55
87435
9
45974
75845
%88%58%3%588@55
4
3!7 84
!!
)!
!

/
))5%8%5584>5%8%55

3
343

5944
3734
3%59%583%5%588@
4357$7 437
F
!$/
E!

/
2&&+&
))5%87%5584
7>5%87%55

58

453
45947853
45%87%585%3%58553
4779
+8 4
7 &C

)!!

/
2&&+&
6 ))5%5%58
543>%8%55

88

4
854849
839488%8%55%%55884
3+
545
&C

)!!

/
2&&+&
6 ))5%5%58
543>%8%55

833
54
558434355594
%88%55%3%558334
3+
548
''
&(
%

"
&

0
/

7

008-
8
34.

0 0 4
+

-80
-

6. 9 ,

:
; *
.
-<

!
B
!
//!

/
2&&+&
))%%555545
>%%55

889
937435883843554
88394%%55%8%555+++@8545
87D 5453

!
B
!
//!

/
2&&+&
))%%555545
>%%55

58
574857545
43574
%%55%5%555+++@5
45
87D 548

BB+&!
!
!

2&&+&
6 ))%7%58
5493>%7%55

55
45
874855455354%%58%57%58"555
458$3 848
F)

!

&!
!
!

/
))%9%5555485
>%9%55

3
347
339493
4
33945%9%55%5%55574555
?+8 548
F)

!

&!
!
!

/
))%9%5555485
>%9%55

895
5
94389
5455943589

4%9%55%%55589
4555
?+8 547
!
&)$/2&&+&
6
!
!
))%8%5555485>%8%55

8
57399433853
48784

853
4%8%55%%55"853
4998837+ 548
++&+!!
/!

2&&+&
6 ))%8%58
543
>%8
%55

57
994
533545748884%8%55%8%5585 455++
548
+:!&$!/
!

/
2&
))%3%58
4>%8%55

557
945984
9
4558
745
%3%58%
%5855
48583&- 84
>3.4???,
.<,

???

00
&8
8

'
%
2
&8
8

%

&

)&'%

# ))&'&

'

# ))&'&

&8
8

8
(8

%%$%
@) '
(
.
=4<<4?,
.,
.,

<,

00
&8
)8

'(%
2
&8
)8

%
&##
()
'

&## ()
'

&8
)8

<
<
%

$#)

)
'($
''
&(
%

"
%

0
/

7

008-
8
34.

0 0 4
+

-80
-

6. 9 ,

:
; *
.
-<

)

!
!

/
))%5%555549>%8
%55

9399549374
849374%5%55%5%55!49975 5497 +C
&&2&&+&
6!

/
))%5%55847>%5%55

587

4
5533438
94594%88%58%3%58855
477!9 848
+C
&&2&&+&
6!

/
))%5%55847>%5%55

5

7 4595489453994
%8%55%8%5585
477!9 548
$!:
!
!

/
))
%%558438>
%8%55

349

9483847
3894
%%58%5%58+++@
4895379B7 438
$

!&)/!
2&&+&
6
!

))
%88%584
>
%8
%55

849754735394557
974
%%55%5%555
473

+$5 54

!/
!

/2&&+&
6 ))7%8%5543>7%8%55

5
745459
4594
5%5
%555%5%5585
45977+ 5489

?
&&&!

/2&&+&
6 ))
%8%5584
>7%8%55

934

334388
9 47
4
5%5%555%5%555
4
87+ 545
F
!$/
E!
!

/
))7%8%55845>7%8%55

79 455
3 487459
3 47%8%58
%5%585
3 4779
9 45
!:/&!

/
2&&+&
6 ))7%
%5849>7%
%55

743748
774733
45%3%555%9%559
4

8+
5 543
F
!$/
!

/
2&&+&
6 ))9%58%58
43>9%8
%55

7
7
94
3
394
384345
%8%55%8%5559
4775
9 5438
+C
!!

/
))9%%58
49
>%8%55

754394779498377
4 %8%55%8%5559
47
8$/ 54
''
&(
%

"
$

0
/

7

008-
8
34.

0 0 4
+

-80
-

6. 9 ,

:
; *
.
-<
+!/&
!//D:++!
!

/
))88%8%5549
>88%8%55

545958499849
57945%5%555%55%555@5
488855)
545
/
/!

!
!
!

/
))5%9%5558497>5%7%557
58999
455
4
34555
45%9%555%5%55855
4
999+! 849

!$/&
!

/
2&&+&
6 ))5%8%555547>5%8%557

79 74

489498

45%8%555%87%558+++@

47899
547
/
/!

!

/2&&+&
6 ))8%53%555438>%%557

34
83358479848
557745%55%555%89%558
84
999+ 54
(
)$('(

%$'

($% &
'

'&$

#) ##)'&%

-1!

/
/0-

)++C/%&)
))85%7%58354>85%5%555
99549
9
4
3
49
485%7%8385%%83
88@9
458-A8 54
!
)/://

?!C
!)

/
))%5%5584
3>%89%55
9843
95
4894595
4%5%58%83%58
8895
455

5$5 4
3 $
('
%# (')
$

'( $

-1!

*<

+C!

/
))7%%584
>7%%55
55747
5
477348
84%8%5%7%555
473
!&9 845
& $$#'
&

$'$%&
%

'
(&%& (('

&
%

-1!
!*

:!

-+&
/?
!
))88%9%5848>%8
%55
774987
443
74888%9%88%8%8""7
49358
) 483
!5838
))5%59%58354>%5%55
833497894849894585%59%835%83%83!894 78?3 54
''
&(
%

"
)

0
/

7

008-
8
34.

0 0 4
+

-80
-

6. 9 ,

:
; *
.
!*

:):!

-+&
/!:/
))%8%5835477>7%8
%55
793497
9453745
7
48%8%83%%83!7
4
35)5 5477
!58
))85%85%58455>7%8
%55

5584
84845
85547
85%85%885%%8""
84937
9)9 455
!583
))%59%583849>%8
%55
79978497973495
4

79734
%59%83%5%83""79734358
849
$&55
))3%53%554
>%58%55
83549
83
845745883
954
3%53%53%55%5""83
347875
733 4

&&5838
))5%8%5835438>3%8
%55
38943
94
3438
45%8%835%
%83""!
4
5?
5438
!B:?
!!:/
))8%5%5847>3%8
%55
894
748
474838%5%88%89%8!74
888

47
!)583
))%55%583549>3%8
%55

99439
38498
4 8
8479%55%83%83%83""!
374
) 549
!583
))5%8%583543>8%8
%55
54957548884
8
495%8%835%
%83""!77487
93C)5 543

!5838
))
%%58354
8>88%8
%55

4
9743
847
97543
%%83
%58%83""
99849785? 54
8 +&55+
))3%5%554>88%8
%55
855847385337495545585334773%5%53%8 %5!85
4
973
5 4
$!5838
))8%87%5835439>88%87%55
5354
538984748538734778%87%838%%83""!538954375 7B) 5439
!):!:/
))
%%583547>85%8
%55
78749795435
477774

%%83%%83""7974787)3 547

+?&5588
))%8%558453>8%5
%55
8954989337434789334
%8%58%5%58""89
4

38! 453
)583
))7%57%58354>5%8
%55

5947
5
43

4
55477%57%837%83%83""!
5749785? 54
''
&(
%

"
(

0
/

7

008-
8
34.

0 0 4
+

-80
-

6. 9 ,

:
; *
.
!*

$!5835
))%89%583547
>5%87%55
98
3439894949984%89%83%3%83""9834775 9)5 547

!B5835
))%89%583547>%8
%55
584355
58453345
87455%89%83%3%83!5
547
887&9 547
&558
))%58%55843>%55%55
5

4753345349353394%58%58%8%58""5 435
43
-A5838
))8%%583843>%55%55
847
53353489949533874998%%838%8%83!53334335 843 $&5585
))
%57%5584>
%5%55

5947
33
34 94
334
%57%58
%8%58!7483 4

-A558
))8%53%5584
>9%55%55
895
477895554
39458958549
8%53%58%58%5""895543355 84

)55
))8%53%55849>8%8
%55
35984
9359499943595848%53%58%58%5""359847885:)7 849 55
))9%59%554>8%8
%55
5957548
59
94
49359
78499%59%59%58%5""59
4
359-+
4
+?55
))9%8
%554>8%5
%55
83743883493884588
4 9%8
%59%%5!8887483778!) 4
!B558
))8%55%55843>85%87%55
85548894388
43889848%55%58%8%5!85949388
B5 843
!55+
))9%55%554>85%87%55
5
73
45
73498
45
758459%55%59%8%5!5
773453 4
+!558
))7%5%554

>5%8%55

5
88495
5554784985
58437%5%57%87%5!5
547

973- 4

-A55+
))%85%5549>5%5%55

38554933354359848333
4%85%5%%5""!
43553+3 49
?!55+
))7%5%5547>
%8
%55

57884557954
77453579584937%5%57%87%5!5794
387? 47
''
&(
%

"
#

0
/

7

008-
8
34.

0 0 4
+

-80
-

6. 9 ,

:
; *
.
!*

C5588
))%8%558475>%8
%55

587549533774

949533
94%8%58%7%58""!584
889
475
!558
))%5%5584>3%8
%55

8374
833344983339437%5%58%5%58!543&9 4 C5585
))9%5%5584
7>88%89%55

5884
93349488337489%5%589%5%58""! 4
889B
5 4
7 !558
))88%5%5584>8%58%557
578
435733947745733488%5%5888%87%58""!5948 $ 43
!B5585
))%58%5584
5>5%89%557
5839343553784
54553
84 8%58%58%8%58!55
488D 4
5 !558
))88%89%55849>
%8
%557
5879843533
74337349533
4888%89%5888%3%58!5843
)7 49

!)555
))8%5%5558453>7%8
%557
5

374995
394387455
3734988%5%558%83%55!5

4
575 8453
!B558
))9%5%5584

>7%8
%557
8954
374384935749%5%589%58%58"" 4889) 4

)
55888
))3%59%5584
>3%8
%557
5
8539495573347485734573%59%583%5%58""57 45
7
4

!5588
))8%59%558499>3%8
%557
5
54957333
4
35457333438%59%588%83%58""59487 499 $!558
))8%58%55847>3%87%557
87989458933
4334
8933
4 8%58%588%8%58""89
475

8 47
!555
))%87%5555455>8%8
%557
598754959334
85
4593348%87%55%3%55!59
4399) 5455
?!558)
))88%%55848>8%8
%557
89845533
497884533

4
88%%588%57%58!4387C7 48
C5558
))%5%5555479>8%8
%557
334
3
354853347
359493%5%55%8
%55""!

4
889
5479
''
&(
%

0
/

7

008-
8
34.

0 0 4
+

-80
-

6. 9 ,

:
; *
.
!*

$!5558
))8%83%5558457>88%87%557
535
4995835488545838458%83%558%88%55!58 487 8457

558
))88%%55884>88%87%557
993
4
333
495848833384888%%5888%8%58!
4885 84

55588
))%%55554>%8
%559
3978433375443333754%%55%5%55! 488A3 54
)%'&
#
$ &%
'%# &%

#'
'(# &%

$')
# &%
)')&
-1!
#(
#( &
$'&( #( (%# #&%'))
')) ($
$&'(( #( $)
(#('
$ #% )$ )'%

1!
"#(
#( &
$'&( "#( (%# #&%')) "($
$&'(( "#( $)
(#('
$ "#% )$ )'%
'))2
"#% #&#

'

"($
$&'((
4
A

4

1!
+

, ".0"

"
4
''
&(
%

64

-
34.
0
-

. .
.

-
4

;B8?

;B8?

3:
%%55
!
B
!
//!

/
2&&+&
))%%555545
>%%55

5
87
D 2883946 4 2883946854%8%55 %%55 $

!&)/!
2&&+&
6
!

))
%88%584
>
%8
%55

+$5
27
974
6 2486 254765
4%5%55
%%55
!
B
!
//!

/
2&&+&
))%%555545
>%%55

5
87
D 2574
6 4 2574
65
4%5%55
%9%55 F)

!

&!

!
!

/
))%9%5555485
>%9%55

555
?+8
2 339456 4 2
33945674%5%55
%9%55 F)

!

&!

!
!

/
))%9%5555485
>%9%55

555
?+8
289

46 4 289

4689
4%%55
%8%55 !
&)$/2&&+&
6
!
!
))%8%5555485>%8%55

998837+
2853
46 4 2853
46853
4%%55
%%55 &)
%2&&+&
6!
!

/
))5%
%58
547
>5%
%55

+
2539
45 6 29346 2
54965
4%%55
%8%55 &C

)!!

/
2&&+&
6 ))5%5%58
543>%8%55

3+

28394886 285456 28
3346884%%55
%88%55 &C

)!!

/
2&&+&
6 ))5%5%58
543>%8%55

3+

25594
6 287486 255
4768334%3%55
%87%55 !555
))%87%5555455>8%8
%557
399) 25933486 4 2593348659
4%3%55
%8%55 !
&)/!

/
2&&+&
6 ))7%%55847
>7%%55

5$

238
4 6 274576 23

4976
4%8%55
''
&(
%

"
$

64

-
34.
0
-

. .
.

-
4

;B8?

;B8?

3:
%8%55 ++&+!!
/!

2&&+&
6 ))%8%58
543
>%8
%55

55++

2846 29794856 29
48565
4%8%55
%8%55 +C
!!

/
))9%%58
49
>%8%55

7
8$/ 2377
4 6 25834
56 23574569
4%8%55
%8%55 +C
&&2&&+&
6!

/
))%5%55847>%5%55

77!9
253994
6 28

4 76 25

4765
4%8%55
%8%55 F
!$/
!

/
2&&+&
6 ))9%58%58
43>9%8
%55

775
9
2345
6 2746 235945369
4%8%55
%5%55 C5558
))%5%5555479>8%8
%557

889
2
3594936 4 2
3594936

4%8
%55
%%55
55588
))%%55554>%8
%559
88A3 23337546 4 23337546
4%5%55
%5%55
)

!
!

/
))%5%555549>%8
%55

9975 293746 4 2937464%5%55

&8
8

>3.4???,
.<,

???

00
&8
8

'
%
2

&8
8

%%$%
@)

# ))&'&

'

# ))&'&

&

8
(8

&8
)8

.
=4<<4?,
.
,
.,

<,

00
&8
)8

'(%
2

&8
)8

%
$#)

)
&## ()
'

&## ()
'

$ $#'$
$ ()$ %
&'
$ (%# (
'$ $ (

-1!
4<

%5
%55 /CF598
))88%8%5835435>9%8%55
89D- 4 8549 8549
887488%8%55
%5
%55 &:&&/!::!
)

))85%8%58554

>9%8%555
89-B5 4 77748 7774837748%8%55
%5
%55 &:&&/!::!
)

))88%8%58
54987>7%8%555
89+&:!9 4 34 34587
497%8%55
''
&(
%

"
)

64

-
34.
0
-

. .
.

-
4

;B8?

;B8?

4<

%5
%55 5895
))
%8%58545>85%8%555
87
$D 4
3455
34555788487%8%55
%5
%55 +78
))8%8%584>%8%5
8F3):5 4 934 9348758479%8%55
%5
%55 &:&&/!::!
)

))
%8%5854
8>88%8%555
89+8+/ 4 54
7 54
79
4%8%55
%5
%55 /C

))85%8%5845>9%8%55
89CC3 4 53457 53457837849%8%55
%%55 $&)//!

/
))%%584>%%55
88$- 4
4
455
4%%55
%7%55
BB+&!
!
!

2&&+&
6 ))%7%58
5493>%7%55

58$3 4
947 94755
4%7%55
%%55 !
))

/
))3%%5545
>3%%55
89

?
4 4 454%%55
%8%55 $&)//$!:

!
!

/
))7%8%55847
9>3%8%55
88$
4 5845
5845
5

4%8%55
%8%55 !!
)!

!
!

/
))3%8%558475
>3%8%55
357F7 4 9845
9845
5

4%8%55
%8%55
/&
&)$/!

/
2&&+&
))3%8%558477>3%8%55
7875: 4 8
7
84
8 7
84

4%8%55
%8
%55 )
55888
))3%59%5584
>3%8
%557
5 7
4 854 85457
4%8
%55
%8
%55 !583
))%59%583849>%8
%55
8
4 88
45 88
459977459%8
%55
%8
%55 ++&+!!
/!

2&&+&
6 ))%8%58
543
>%8
%55

55++
4
9349
9349
5
4%8
%55
%8
%55 !)555
))8%5%5558453>7%8
%557

575 4 5948 59485

4%8
%55
''
&(
%

"
(

64

-
34.
0
-

. .
.

-
4

;B8?

;B8?

4<

%8
%55 /:!+)
-!
B+&!
-
+)/
))85%5%55475>%8
%55
7 7)/5 4 8
34 8 3474%8
%55
%8
%55 ?!558)
))88%%55848>8%8
%557
387C7 4 55549
55549
4%8
%55
%8
%55 !B5585
))%58%5584
5>5%89%557
88D 4 394
394
55
4%8
%55
%8
%55 !B:?
!!:/
))8%5%5847>3%8
%55
88

4 85748 85748
345%8
%55
%8
%55 +&55+
))3%5%554>88%8
%55

973
5 4 8479 847985
4%8
%55
%8
%55 :/!
/:!%+
/
))3%8
%55849
>3%8
%55
3855B9 4 9
4 9
454%8
%55
%8
%55 !558
))88%89%55849>
%8
%557
3
)7 4 8534
8534
584%8
%55
%8
%55 )583
))7%57%58354>5%8
%55
85? 4 843
843
7355495%8
%55
%8
%55 !B558
))8%55%55843>85%87%55
88
B5 4 3477 34778377473%8
%55
%8
%55 !583
))5%8%583543>8%8
%55
7 93C)5 4 5
94 5
94 87
7 477%8
%55
%8
%55 +!558
))7%5%554

>5%8%55

973- 4 85
483 85
4835984%8
%55
%8
%55 !58
))88%5%58487>8%8
%55
8
7 4 9479 9479884%8
%55
%8
%55 !55+
))9%55%554>85%87%55
3 4 88845 888455979458%8
%55
%8
%55 C5585
))9%5%5584
7>88%89%55

889B
5 4 874 874
4%8
%55
%8
%55 !558
))%5%5584>3%8
%55

3&9 4 74 7454%8
%55
%8
%55 :):!

-+&
/!:/
))%8%5835477>7%8
%55
35)5 4 34 34574%8
%55
''
&(
%

"
#

64

-
34.
0
-

. .
.

-
4

;B8?

;B8?

4<

%8
%55 !B:?
!!:/
))9%5
%5848>7%8
%55
88)8 4 834 83498
43%8
%55
%8
%55 55
))9%59%554>8%8
%55
359-+
4 848
848
5339457%8
%55
%8
%55 !):!:/
))
%%583547>85%8
%55
87)3 4 85743 85743
93438%8
%55
%8
%55
558
))88%%55884>88%87%557
885 4 4 4
4%8
%55
%8
%55 !)583
))%55%583549>3%8
%55

) 4 5
34 3 5
34 3885
5495%8
%55
%8
%55
!5588
))8%59%558499>3%8
%557
87 4 8945
8945
594%8
%55
%8
%55 !B558
))9%5%5584

>7%8
%557
889) 4 5437 5437
4%8
%55
%8
%55 ?!55+
))7%5%5547>
%8
%55

387? 4 85457 854575
835458%8
%55
%8
%55 )55
))8%53%55849>8%8
%55
85:)7 4 8
34 8
3485

4 8%8
%55
%8
%55
!5838
))
%%58354
8>88%8
%55
85? 4 88
45 88
45

849%8
%55
%8
%55 :!

-+&
/?
!
))88%9%5848>%8
%55
358
) 4 7437 7437899584%8
%55
%8
%55 &&5838
))5%8%5835438>3%8
%55
5?
4 348 3487943%8
%55
%8
%55 !58
))85%85%58455>7%8
%55
7 9)9 4 5534
5534

847%8
%55
%8
%55 /:!+)
-!
B+&!
-
+)/
))85%5%554>%8
%55
7 7)! 4
874
87458

4%8
%55
%8
%55 !B5835
))%89%583547>%8
%55
887&9 4 5847 58473

493%8
%55
%8
%55 C5588
))%8%558475>%8
%55

889
4 84
84
584%8
%55
''
&(
%

"
&

64

-
34.
0
-

. .
.

-
4

;B8?

;B8?

4<

%87%55 $!5558
))8%83%5558457>88%87%557
87 4 55
49 55
49 58
4%87%55
%87%55 $!5838
))8%87%5835439>88%87%55
75
7B) 4 8495 849558545%87%55
%87%55 $!5835
))%89%583547
>5%87%55
75
9)5 4 834 83475943%87%55
%87%55 $!558
))8%58%55847>3%87%557
75

8 4 33489 3348989
4%87%55
%89%55 !
)/://

?!C
!
)

/
))%5%5584
3>%89%55
55 5$5 4
57
475 57
47595
4%89%55
%8%55 !&
//?+!

/
2&&+&
6 ))%8%55849
>%8%55

8+ 4 8
85
4 8 85
44%8%55
%8%55 !5838
))5%59%58354>%5%55
8?3 4 843 8438994%8%55
%5%55 -?&583
))8%%5838433>88%58%555
3579B) 4 53455 53455897834
7%5%55
%5%55 $&55
))3%53%554
>%58%55
75
733 4 948 94853845%5%55
%5%55 -&
585
))88%58%5845
>%5%55
3573+) 4 8437 8437
8
4
%5%55
%5%55 &558
))%58%55843>%55%55
35
4 845
845
5
4%5%55
%5%55 -A5838
))8%%583843>%55%55
35 4
74
7493479%5%55
%5%55 $&5585
))
%57%5584>
%5%55
83 4 854 85474%5%55
%5%55 -A55+
))%85%5549>5%5%55

3553+3 4 83
4 83
4
4%5%55
%5%55 -A558
))8%53%5584
>9%55%55
355 4 53743
53743
83578745%5%55
%58%55 !558
))88%5%5584>8%58%557
8
$ 4 834 834594%58%55
''
&(
%

"
&

64

-
34.
0
-

. .
.

-
4

;B8?

;B8?

4<

%5%55
!
!)
-
&+C
/
))3%5%5584
>3%5%55

8B)A 4 5 854
5 854
35
4%5%55
%5
%55 +?55
))9%8
%554>8%5
%55
3778!) 4 743 7438
5347%5
%55
%5
%55 +?&5588
))%8%558453>8%5
%55

38! 4 5453 545389
4%5
%55
%%55 /
/!

!

/
2&&+&
6 ))8%53%555438>%%557

999+ 4 9
394

9 394

84%%55
%8%55 :/!
/:!
/
))3%%55845
>3%%55
3855)7 4 85
4 85
45
4%8%55
%& $$('&
%& $$('&

'

')$

-1!
.:0,><
%5
%55 5895
))
%8%58545>85%8%555
87
$D 53548 4 53548 28456 453548%8%55 %5
%55 +78
))8%8%584>%8%5
8F3):5
8 485 4
8 485 2

486 4
8 485%8%55
%5
%55 &:&&/!::!
)

))88%8%58
54987>7%8%555
89+&:!9
455 4
455 79493 4
455%8%55
%5
%55 5895
))
%8%58545>85%8%555
87
$D 949 4 949 2
436 4949%8%55
%5
%55 &:&&/!::!
)

))85%8%58554

>9%8%555
89-B5 3 3
4 4 3 3
4 2874796 433
4%8%55
%5
%55 &:&&/!::!
)

))
%8%5854
8>88%8%555
89+8+/ 497 4 497 294
6 4497%8%55
%5
%55 /C

))85%8%5845>9%8%55
89CC3 43 4 43 4 443%8%55 %5
%55 /CF598
))88%8%5835435>9%8%55
89D- 3
948 4 3
948 45 43
948%8%55
%8
%55 !55+
))9%55%554>85%87%55
3 58 83943 4 58 83943 439 45883943%8 %55
%8
%55 !583
))5%8%583543>8%8
%55
7 93C)5 8 3345
4 8 3345
54 483345
%8
%55
''
&(
%

"
&

64

-
34.
0
-

. .
.

-
4

;B8?

;B8?

.:0,><
%8
%55 !):!:/
))
%%583547>85%8
%55
87)3 88 945 4 88 945 54
488945%8
%55
%8
%55 :):!

-+&
/!:/
))%8%5835477>7%8
%55
35)5 8
4 4 8
4 8493 48
4%8
%55
%8
%55 !B5835
))%89%583547>%8
%55
887&9 88
848 4 88
848 848 488
848%8
%55
%8
%55 !583
))%59%583849>%8
%55
8
3 374
4 3 374
4 43374
%8
%55
%8
%55 :!

-+&
/?
!
))88%9%5848>%8
%55
358
) 88
47 4 88
47 547 488
47%8
%55
%8
%55 ?!55+
))7%5%5547>
%8
%55

387? 8
847 4 8
847 8483 48
847%8
%55
%8
%55 !58
))88%5%58487>8%8
%55
8
7 8 84 4 8 84 5498 4884%8 %55
%8
%55 +!558
))7%5%554

>5%8%55

973- 5 734 4 5 734 8475 45734%8 %55
%8
%55 !B:?
!!:/
))8%5%5847>3%8
%55
88

88 8548 4 88 8548 48 4888548%8 %55
%8
%55 55
))9%59%554>8%8
%55
359-+
83 7458 4 83 7458 84
4837458%8
%55
%8
%55 )55
))8%53%55849>8%8
%55
85:)7 3 43 4 3 43 548 4343%8 %55
%8
%55 !B558
))8%55%55843>85%87%55
88
B5 8 43 4 8 43 547 4843%8 %55
%8
%55 )583
))7%57%58354>5%8
%55
85? 8
33
437 4 8
33
437 845 48
33
437%8
%55
%8
%55 !B:?
!!:/
))9%5
%5848>7%8
%55
88)8 9 8
43 4 9 8
43 848 498
43%8
%55
%8
%55 &&5838
))5%8%5835438>3%8
%55
5?
3 747 4 3 747 8487 43747%8 %55
%8
%55 !)583
))%55%583549>3%8
%55

) 57 7
747 4 57 7
747 4 4577
747%8
%55
%8
%55 !58
))85%85%58455>7%8
%55
7 9)9 59 49 4 59 49
45 45949%8
%55
''
&(
%

"
&

64

-
34.
0
-

. .
.

-
4

;B8?

;B8?

.:0,><
%8
%55
!5838
))
%%58354
8>88%8
%55
85? 3 5498 4 3 5498 843 435498%8 %55
%87%55 $!5838
))8%87%5835439>88%87%55
75
7B) 8 8343 4 8 8343 847 488343%87%55 %87%55 $!5835
))%89%583547
>5%87%55
75
9)5 8
4 4 8
4 8458 48
4%87%55
%8%55 !5838
))5%59%58354>%5%55
8?3 9745 4 9745 485 49745%8%55 %5%55 -&
585
))88%58%5845
>%5%55
3573+)
8
4
4
8
4
455 4
8
4
%5%55
%5%55 $&55
))3%53%554
>%58%55
75
733 89 34
3 4 89 34
3 8498 48934
3%5%55
%5%55 -A558
))8%53%5584
>9%55%55
355 5 54
4 5 54
54 4554
%5%55
%5%55 -A5838
))8%%583843>%55%55
35 349 4 349 543 4349%5%55 %5%55 -?&583
))8%%5838433>88%58%555
3579B) 89 7834
7 4 89 7834
7 45 4897834
7%5%55
%5
%55 +?55
))9%8
%554>8%5
%55
3778!) 88 54
4 88 54
47 48854
%5
%55

'

%#('( %%( #
&'
(%%( #
&'
(%%( #
&'
(

-1!

??
%%55 :/!
/:!%+
/
))5%8
%55584
>5%8
%55

3855)A8 5 889439 5547 5
4 7
47
79459 4%5%55
%%55 :/!
/:!%+
/
))5%8
%55584
>5%8
%55

3855)A8 833
948 84 833 988483 8 9485 8
49 54%5%55
%9%55 F)

!

&!

!
!

/
))7%%5549>9%
%55
555
-3 589
834 57
455 589 7475 25456 25
5436 554%%55
%8%55 :/!
/:!
/
))5%8%587849
>8%8%55
3855
3 7
45 8 93843 35 7
745 8 3453 9348 39
4%%55
%8%55 :/!
/:!%+
/
))5%8
%55584
>5%8
%55

3855)A8 5 53437 349 5
8349 7748
749 5
4%%55
''
&(
%

"
&&

64

-
34.
0
-

. .
.

-
4

;B8?

;B8?

??
%%55 :/!
/:!
/
))5%8%587849
>8%8%55
3855
59 8945
7 478 59 794 99488 8 983435 5
4%%55
%8%55 :/!
/:!
/
))5%8%587849
>8%8%55
3855
8 5
49 5
948 88 5437 5
94 7
349 84%%55
%88%55 :/!
/:!
/
))5%8
%55849
>5%8
%55
3855A7 8
7495 8749 8

547 2555496 246 8
4%3%55
%88%55 :/!
/:!
/
))5%8%587849
>8%8%55
3855
7 34 88485 7
5437 3743 5743
74%3%55
%8%55 :/!
/:!
/
))5%8
%55849
>5%8
%55
3855A7
7
745

43
8 8
483 2
59496 285
84
6
4%8%55
%8%55 :/!
/:!
/
))5%8
%55849
>5%8
%55
3855A7 8

574
5 8
3478 8

8348 25346 2
46 8

4%8%55
%5%55 :/!
/:!
/
))5%8
%55849
>5%8
%55
3855A7
48
7437 8 43 27
46 2877436 4%8
%55
%%55 :/!
/:!
/
))5%8
%55849
>5%8
%55
3855A7 5 779439 7348
5
75485 299834956 25
496 5
4%5%55

&8
8

3
:<,

00

8%8

')%2

8%8

#
(
(@($

&
%$#'& (&'%(

& #%'#
& &')# %#'$$ =4=,

8
(8

&8
)8

3
:<,

00

8%8

')%2

8%8

#
(
(@($ &##

'# #$('%( &## #)
'&# # $()'%
%
)') =4=,%

( %&'($ # ))&'% %)
&('(& $ (( %'$$ )# )#$')%$ )%

-1!

'%( &$ '$$ )& ))#'#
%) (&)'$% # ))&'%

1!

"%) (&)'$% ")& ))#'#
"&$ '$$"
'%( "# ))&'%
+

, ".0"

"
4
''
&(
%

"
&%

G
Agenda Item #

STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

DATE: Regular Meeting of June 14, 2022

TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council

SUBMITTED BY: Thomas Lloyd Smith, City Attorney TLS

SUBJECT: Second Reading: Ordinance Amending Ordinance 2207-C-S (Relating to the Sale, Possession, or Provision of Specified Products by Tobacco Retailers or Businesses) By Providing a Grace Period Prior to the Effective Date of Ordinance 2207-C-S

RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that the C ity Council adopt the proposed ordinance (“Attachment A”) amending Ordinance 2207-C-S by providing a grace period until December 1, 2022.

FISCAL IMPACT
The proposed action will have no effect on the City’s budget.

DISCUSSION
The proposed ordinance would modify the eff ective date of Ordinance 2207- C-S by adding a grace period until December 1, 2022.

At its March 8, 2022 meeting, the City Co uncil adopted Ordinance 2207- C-S. T his Ordinance took effect thirty days after its date of adoption. Ordinance 2207-C-S related to the sale, possession , provision of speci fied products by tobacco retailers and businesses (“Attachment B”). Recently, several tobacco retailers and businesses have indicated to the City that the implementation of Ordinance 2207-C-S within thirty days of its adoption creates a financial hardship for them by prohibitin g them from selling inventory they have already purchased.

To minimize this ha rdship, the attached Ordinance would modify the effective date of Ordinance 2207-C-S by adding a grace period until December 1, 2022.

ATTACHMENT
A. Draft ordinance amending Ordinance 2207-C-S
B. Ordinance 2207 -C-S

ATTACHMENT A

ORDINANCE NO. _____

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANTIOCH AMENDING ORDINANCE 2207-C-S (RELATING TO THE SALE, POSSESSION, OR

PROVISION OF SPECIFIED PRODUCTS BY TOBACCO RETAILERS OR

BUSINESSES) BY PROVIDING A GRACE PERIOD PRIOR TO THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF ORDINANCE 2207-C-S

The City Council of the City of Antioch does ordain as follows:

SECTION 1:

The City Council is committed to tak ing the steps necessary to provide a healthy, safe environment for all City residents. Towards that goal, the City is concerned about the adverse effect of cigarettes and related tobacco products on its residents , including minors.

SECTION 2:

Over the years, the City Council has adopted various ordinances relating to the use of tobacco to protect the health of its residents. Consistent with this goal, the Council took additional steps restricting certain types o f tobacco and tobacco products in the City by adopting Ordinance 2207-C-S with a second reading on March 8, 2022.

SECTION 3:

Immediate implementation of Ordinance 2207- C-S could cause a temporary economic hardship for tobacco retailers and businesses which have already purchased inventory that would otherwise be prohibited by Ordinance 2207-C-S. Accordingly, the Council is willing to provide a reasonable grace period prior to the effective date of Ordinance 2207- C-S.

SECTION 4:

Section 8 of Ordinance 2207- C-S regarding that Ordinance’s effective date is hereby modified to state:

This ordinance shall take effect and be enforced on December 1, 2022 and shall be published once within fifteen (15) days upon passage and adoption in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the City of Antioch.

SECTION 5: Severability:

If any section, subsection, provision or part of this ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance, is held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, the remainder of this ordinance, and the application of such provision to other person or circumstances, shall not be affected thereby and shall remain in full force and effect and, to that end, the provisions of this ordinance are severable.

2 SECTION 6. CEQA.

The above amendment is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act under the common sense exemption ( CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3) because the proposed amendment will not have a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change or effect on the environment.

SECTION 7:

This ordinance shall take effect and be enforced thirty (30) days from and after the date of its adoption and shall be published once within fifteen (15) days upon passage and adoption in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the City of Antioch.

* * * * * * *

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the forgoing ordinance was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Antioch, held on the ____ of _____ 2022, and passed and adopted at a regular meeting thereof, held on the ____ day of _____ 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Lamar Thorpe, Mayor of the City of Antioch

ATTEST:

Elizabeth Householder
City Clerk of the City of Antioch

ATTACHMENT B

H
Agenda Item #

STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

DATE: Regular Meeting of June 14, 2022

TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council

SUBMITTED BY: Thomas Lloyd Smith, City Attorney TLS

SUBJECT: Second Reading: Ordinance Forming the Public Safety and Community Resources Department

RECOMMENDED ACTION

It is recommended that the City Council adopt the proposed ordinance (“Attachment A”) forming the Public Safety and Community Resources Department.

FISCAL IMPACT

The proposal for the Public Safety and Community Resources Department involves both existing and new staff positions. New staff positions may include the Public Safety and Community Resources Director, Public Safety Manager, Public Safety Coordinator, Youth Coordinator, Community Resource Specialists, Administrative Analysts, and an Executive Assistant. Existing positions moved into the new department include the Youth Services Network Manager, Unhoused Resident Coordinator, Environmental Resources Administrative Analyst, and CDBG & Housing Consultant. Community Resource Specialists are also expected to have dedicated City vehicles that can be used to perform their work within the City. The Public Safety and Community Resources Department will also require dedication and potential renovation of office space as well as purchase of furniture, supplies, and equipment.

The budget for the Public Safety and Community Resources Department is not under consideration at this meeting. The City Council will have t he opportunity to consider the budget for new positions, office space, supplies, and equipment in its upcoming consideration of the fiscal year budget.

Antioch City Council Report
June 14, 2022 Agenda Item #H 2

DISCUSSION

The Public Safety and Community Resources Department Ad Hoc Committee, consisting of Councilmember Torres-Walker and Councilmember Wilson, met with the City Attorney, City Manager, and several department heads to develop a new ordinance to form the Public Safety and Community Resources Department. The ordinance includes information about the Department’s purpose, leadership, divisions, and personnel.

The Public Safety and Community Resources Department will be operated under the authority of the Director of Public Safety and Community Resources subject to the direction of the City Manager. The salary of the Public Safety and Community Resources Director will be as fixed from time to time by the City Council.

The Director of Public Safety and Community Resources will be responsible for supervision of the Department’s divisions. The Department will include the following divisions: (1) Housing and Homelessness Division; (2) Violence Intervention and Prevention Division, (3) Youth Services Division ; (4) Environmental Sustainability and Resilience Division; and (5) Community Engagement Division.

The Housing and Homelessness Division will provide housing services to the City’s low income and unhoused residents. The division will actively work with local school districts, county, state, and federal governments , housing providers, law enforcement and non- profit community-based organizations to develop policies and strategies to address the needs of persons experiencing homelessness or housing insecurity . The Housing and Homeless Division will work closely with the City’s Community Development Block Grant Unit, Environmental Sustainability and Resilience D ivision, and housing consultants in soliciting and identifying additional funding.

The Violence Intervention and Prevention Division will work to improve public health and safety by developing programs that resolve conflicts, interrupt violence, and achieve peace. The division will work with community leaders in various diverse neighborhoods throughout the City to achieve peace by implementing initiatives that provide community- based and trauma-informed services to residents with a focus on communities that are disproportionately impacted by violence. The division will apply for support from state and county grant s and contract funding to design and implement initiatives that provide community-focused, and trauma-informed responses to public health and safety issues .

The division will also support and partner with community leaders, currently embedded in the various diverse neighborhoods throughout the C ity to make positive, proactive and reactive changes within the City.

The Youth Services Division will create equitable opportunities that uplift the value of youth voice and engage youth as influencing members of t he City . The division will conduct youth-centered programs, events, and initiatives. Its activities will help youth build positive relationships, gain self -confidence, and meet their personal, educational, vocational, and life goals. The division’s programs will address incidental, emotional, and educational barriers that youth encounter. Programs will also build the capacity of youth to build positive relationships with their families and other positive role models in their lives. The division will collaborate with families, school districts, charter schools, non-profit Antioch City Council Report
June 14, 2022 Agenda Item #H 3
organizations, the police department, and faith-based communities. The Youth Services Division will be operated under the supervision of the Youth Services Network Manager, subject to the direction of the Public Safety and Community Resources Director.

T
he Environmental Sustainability and Resilience Division will manage the City’s sustainability programs, including water conservation, climate change and resilience, energy efficiency, pollution, and waste prevention. The division will advance partnerships for waste collection, recycling grants, the City’s Climate Action and Resilience Plan, and coordinate with other departments and partner agencies.

T
he Community Engagement Division will proactively engage with the community to address critical public health and safety issues through events, initiatives, public forums, and panel discussions. The division will link residents to resources that resolve community public health and safety issues. The division will collaborate with other divisions within the Public Safety and Community Resources Department on matters concerning housing and homelessness, violence intervention and p revention, y outh services, e nvironmental sustainability, and resilience. The division is dedicated to establishing meaningful and sustainable programs that promote diversity, equity , inclusion, and community pride by fostering a sense of belonging for every person.

TACHMENTS
A. Draft Ordinance

ATTACHMENT A
1 ORDINANCE NO. _________

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANTIOCH AMENDING AND RESTATING ARTICLE 8 AND ADDING ARTICLE 9 TO CHAPTER 3 OF TITLE 2

OF THE ANTIOCH MUNICIPAL CODE CREATING THE PUBLIC SAFETY AND

COMMUNITY RESOURCES DEPARTMENT

WHEREAS, the City Council formed the Public Safety and Community Resources Ad Hoc Committee to work with City staff to research and make recommendations to the City Council on the potential formation of the Public Safety and Community Resources Department (the “Department”);

WHEREAS, the City Council directed the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance forming the Public Safety and Community Resources Department;

WHEREAS, Public Safety and Community Resources Department shall include divisions addressing h ousing and h omelessness, violence intervention and prevention, youth services, environmental resources, and community engagement; and

WHEREAS, the Public Safety and Community Resources Department shall be led by the Public Safety and Community Resources Director whose duties shall include planning, directing, managing, and overseeing the activities and operations of the Department.

The City Council of the City of Antioch, California, hereby ordains as follows:

SECTION 4. Recitals. The above recitals are incorporated as though set forth in this section.

SECTION 5. The table of contents for Chapter 3 of Title 2 of the Antioch Municipal Code is hereby amended and restated to add Articles 8 and 9 as follows:

CHAPTER 3: DEPARTMENTS
Section

Article 1: Community Development
[No change]

Article 2: Public Works
[No change]

Article 3: Department of Finance
[No change]

ATTACHMENT A
2 Article 4: [Reserved]
[No change]

Article 5: Department of Leisure Services
[No change]

Article 6: Legal Services
[No change]

Article 7: Information Systems
[No change]

Article 8: Promulgation of Rules by Department HeadsPublic Safety and Community Resources Department
2-3.801 AuthorizationCreated.
2-3.802 Operation.
2-3.803 Housing and Homelessness Division.
2-3.804 Violence Intervention and Prevention Division. 2-3.805 Youth Services Division.
2-3.806 Environmental Resources Division.
2-3.807 Community Engagement Division.

Article 9: Promulgation of Rules by Department Heads

2-3.901 Authorization.

SECTION 6. Articles 8 and 9 of Chapter 3 to Title 2 of the Antioch Municipal Code are hereby amended and restated to read as follows:

ARTICLE 8: Public Safety and Community Resources Department § 2-3.801 AUTHORIZATION.CREATED.

Each department head may prepare written rules and regulations for the conduct of his department. After approval by the City Manager, such rules and regulations shall be the policy of that department and shall be enforceable under the provisions of this code and the personnel rules. Such rules and regulations shall in no way conflict with the policies of the Council or the provisions of this code, the personnel rules of the city, or state laws, and any such conflict shall be resolved in favor of said latter policies, rules, and laws.

ATTACHMENT A
3 There is hereby created in the government of the City a Public Safety and Community Resources Department, which shall consist of the following functions:
(A) Housing and Homelessness
(B) Violence Intervention and Prevention
(C) Youth Services
(D) Environmental Sustainability and Resilience
(E) Community Engagement

§ 2-3.802 OPERATION.

The Public Safety and Community Resources Department shall be operated under the authority of the Public Safety and Community Resources Director subject to the direction of the City Manager. The Public Safety and Community Resources Director shall be responsible for supervision of the department’s divisions.

§ 2-3.803 HOUSING AND HOMELESSNESS DIVISION.

The Housing and Homelessness Division shall provide housing services to the City’s low income and unhoused residents. The division shall actively work with local school districts, county, state, and federal governments, housing providers, law enforcement and non- profit community -based organizations to develop polic ies and strategies to address the needs of persons experiencing homelessness or housing insecurity.

§ 2-3.804 VIOLENCE INTERVENTION AND PREVENTION DIVISION.

The Violence Intervention and Prevention Division shall work to improve public health and safet y by developing programs that resolve conflicts, interrupt violence, and achieve peace. The division shall work with community leaders in various diverse neighborhoods throughout the City to achieve peace by implementing initiatives that provide community -based and trauma- informed services to residents with a focus on communities that are disproportionately impacted by violence.

§ 2-3.805 YOUTH SERVICES DIVISION.

The Youth Services Division shall create equitable opportunities that uplift the value of youth voice and engage youth as influencing members of the City. The division shall conduct youth-centered programs, events, and initiatives . Its activities shall help youth build positive relationships, gain self -confidence, and meet their personal, educational, vocational, and life goals. The division’s p rograms shall address incidental, emotional, and educational barriers that youth encounter. Programs shall also build the capacity of youth to bui ld positive relationships with their families and other positive role models in their lives. The division shall collaborate with families, school districts, charter schools, non-profit organizations, the police department, and faith-based communities. The Youth Services Division shall be operated under the supervision of the Youth Services Network Manager, subject to the direction of the Public Safety and Community Resources Director.

ATTACHMENT A
4 § 2-3.806 ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY AND RESILIENCE DIVISION.

The Environmental Sustainability and Resilience Division shall manage the City’s sustainability programs, including water conservation, climate change and resilience, energy efficiency, pollution, and waste prevention. The division shall advance partnerships for waste collection, recycling grants, the City’s Climate Action and Resilience Plan, and coordinate with other departments and partner agencies.

§ 2-3.807 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DIVISION.

The Community Engagement Division shall proactively engage wit h the community to address critical public health and safety issues through events, initiatives, public forums, and panel discussions. The division shall link residents to resources that resolve community public health and safety issues. The division shall collaborate with other divisions within the Public Safety and Community Resources Department on matters concerning housing and homelessness, violence intervention and prevention, youth services, environmental sustainability, and resilience. The division i s dedicated to establishing meaningful and sustainable programs that promote diversity, equity, inclusion, and community pride by fostering a sense of belonging for every person.

§ 2-3.808 OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES.

The Public Safety and Community Resources Department shall consist of the Public Safety and Community Resources Director and such other employees with such titles and duties as may from time to time be fixed by resolution of the Council.

§ 2-3.809 DIRECTOR DUTIES.

The duties of the Public Safety and Community Resources Director shall include planning, directing, managing, and overseeing the activities and operations of the Public Safety and Community Resources Department including the Housing and Homelessness Division, the Violence Intervention and Prevention Division, the Youth Services Division, the Environmental Sustainability and Resilience Division, and the Community Engagement Division and such other duties as may be assigned by the City Manager.

§ 2-3.910 DIRECTOR SALARY.

The salary of the Public Safety and Community Resources Director shall be as fixed from time to time by the Council.

ARTICLE 9: PROMULGATION OF RULES BY DEPARTMENT HEADS

§ 2-3.9801 AUTHORIZATION.

ATTACHMENT A
5 of the Council or the provisions of this code, the personnel rules of the City, or state laws, and any such conflict shall be resolved in favor of said latter policies, rules, and laws.

SECTION 7. CEQA. The adoption of this Ordinance is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act ( “CEQA”) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), which provides that CEQA only applies to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be determined that the proposed project will not have a signifi cant adverse effect on the environment, the project is not subject to CEQA. This Ordinance authorizes the City Council to create an Antioch Police Oversight Commission and does not propose nor authorize any action or specific project that would have the p otential to cause a significant adverse effect on the environment.

SECTION 8. Severability. Should any provision of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance, be determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unlawful, unenforceable, or otherwise void, that determination shall have no effect on any other provision of this Ordinance or the application of this Ordinance to any other person or circumstance and, to that end, the provisions hereof are severable.

SECTION 9. Publication; Effective D ate. This Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced within thirty (30) days from and after the date of its adoption by the City Council at a second reading and shall be posted and published in accordance with the California Government Code.

* * * * *

ATTACHMENT A
6 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Antioch held on the ___ day of _________, 2022 and passed and adopted at a regular meeting thereof held on the ___ day of _________, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

_____________________________________
Lamar A. Thorpe, Mayor

ATTEST:

_________________________________
Elizabeth Householder, City Clerk

Agenda Item #
S

TAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DAT
E: Regular Meeting of June 14, 2022
T
O: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
S
UBMITTED BY: Thomas Lloyd Smith, City Attorney TLS
SUBJ
ECT: AB 361: Resolution Making Findings Necessary to Conduct Brown Act Meetings by Teleconference for the City Council, Boards, Commissions, and Committees

RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the resolution authorizing remote teleconference/virtual meetings of the legislative bodies of the City of Antioch, which includes the City Council, boards, commissions, and committees.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no anticipated direct or indirect fiscal impact as a result of this item.

DISCUSSION
Even though cases of COVID-19 have dropped, AB 361 is expressly intended “to protect the health and safety of civil servants and the public and does not preference the experience of members of the public who might be able to attend a meeting in a physical location over members of the public who cannot travel or attend that meeting in a physical location” because of physical status.

T
he City of Antioch has utilized teleconference technology for some time, and since the State of Emergency is still in effect and state officials are still recommending measures to promote social distancing, especially for immunocompromised and sensitive groups (as described in the attached Resolution), the City’s legislative bodies, which include the City Council, boards, commissions, and committees can continue to meet while providing access to the public via teleconference. This resolution makes the findings required by AB 361, and would apply Citywide – i.e., not just to the City Council but to all City commission s and committees subject to the Brown Act as well. Staff requests passage of the attached resolution, which enables “hybrid meetings” including in-person and teleconference public participation or virtual meetings via teleconference for the City Council, boards, commissions, and committees.

U
nder this resolution, City Council, commissions, boards, and committees can continue holding virtual meetings or hybrid meetings in compliance with the following more flexible standards:

I
Antioch City Council Report
June 14, 2022 Agenda Item # 2
• The City is not required to provide a physical location for the public to attend or provide comments.
• Public access to the meeting via a call-in or an internet-based service option must be allowed, but the City is not required to have members of the public attend at each teleconference location.
• The City is only required to notice and post an agenda in accordance with the Brown Act provisions for in-person meetings. The agenda shall identify and include an opportunity for all persons to attend via a call-in option or an internet- based service option.
• When notice of the time of the teleconferenced meeting given or the agenda for the meeting is posted, the City shall also give notice of the means by which members of the public may access the meeting and offer public comment. • The City must provide an opportunity for the public to address and offer comment in real time and cannot require all public comments to be submitted in advance of the meeting.

ATTACHMENTS
A. Resolution
I

ATTACHMENT A
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANTIOCH

MAKING THE REQUIRED FINDINGS TO AUTHORIZE REMOTE

TELECONFERENCE/VIRTUAL MEETINGS OF THE LEGISLATIVE

BODIES OF THE CITY OF ANTIOCH FOR A PERIOD OF THIRTY

DAYS PURSUANT TO BROWN ACT PROVISIONS

WHEREAS, the City of Antioch is committed to preserving and nurturing public access and participation in public meetings under the Ralph M. Brown Act;

WHEREAS, all meetings of the City’s legislative bodies, which includes the City Council, boards, commissions, and committees, are open and public, as required by the Ralph M. Brown Act (Cal. Gov. Code 54950 – 54963), such that any member of the public may attend, participate, and watch the City’s legislative bodies conduct their business;

WHEREAS, as recently amended by AB 361, Government Code section 54953(e) of the Brown Act makes provisions for remote teleconferencing participation in meetings by members of a legislative body, without compliance with the requirements of Government Code section 54953(b)(3), subject to the existence of certain conditions;

WHEREAS, a required condition is that a s tate of emergency is declared by the Governor pursuant to Government Code section 8625, proclaiming the existence of conditions of disaster or of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within the state caused by conditions as described in Government Code section 8558;

WHEREAS, it is further required that state or local officials have recommended or imposed measures t o promote social distancing, or the legislative body determines by majority vote that meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health and safety of attendees;

WHEREAS, such conditions now exist in the City ; specifically, on March 4, 2020, the Governor of the State of California proclaimed a State of Emergency, and such proclamation remains in effect and has not been rescinded or cancelled, and the “SMARTER” plan that the Governor unveiled specifically indicates that the State of Emergency will not be terminated;

WHEREAS, in addition to the above, state offici als have issued orders recommending social distancing measures for certain individuals and in certain situations.

For example, and not by way of limitation, social distancing is referenced in guidance on vaccine doses for persons who are immunocompromised and in certain situations under general industry safety orders;

WHEREAS, the state legislature has also made findings that by removing the requirement that public meetings be conducted at a primary physical location with a quorum of members present, AB 361 protects the health and safety of civil servants and

ATTACHMENT A
the public and does not preference the experience of members of the public who might be able to attend a meeting in a physical location over members of the public who cannot travel or attend that meeting in a physical location;

WHEREAS, the City Council does hereby find that all of the legislative bodies of the City shall conduct their meetings without compliance with paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) of Government Code section 54953, as authorized by subdivision (e) of section 54953, and that such legislative bodies shall comply with the requirements to provide the public with access to the meetings as prescribed in paragraph (2) of subdivi sion (e) of section 54953; and

WHEREAS, the City will provide live call-in and/or internet service-based option for remote public participation and will provide notice for such participation in the agendas posted in advance of the meetings.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANTIOCH DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Recitals. The Recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated into this Resolution by this reference.

Section 2. Findings. The City Council hereby finds that, as set forth above, due to the novel coronavirus a State of Emergency declared by the Governor of the State of California is currently in effect, and that state or local officials are recomm ending measures promote social distancing.

Section 3. Remote Teleconference Meetings. The City Manager and City Attorney are hereby authorized and directed to take all actions necessary to conduct open and public meetings for all the legislative bodies of the City in accordance with Government Code section 54953(e) and other applicable provisions of the Brown Act.

Section 4. Effective Date of Resolution . This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon its adoption and shall remain in effect until the earlier of 30 days from the effective date of this Resolution , or such time the City Council adopts a subsequent resolution in accordance with Government Code section 54953(e)(3) to extend the time during which the legislative bodies of the City may continue to teleconference.

* * * * * * * * *

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Antioch at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 14th day of June, 2022 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

ATTACHMENT A
_____________________________________

ELIZABETH HOUSEHOLDER

CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANTIOCH

CITY OF

ANTIOCH

CALIFORNIA

STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE:

TO:

Regular Meeting of June 14, 2022
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
SUBMITTED BY: Dawn Merchant, Finance Director c.;?}ht,
Lauren Posada, City Treasurer
SUBJECT: Statement of Investment Policy

RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution approving the Statement of Investment Policy.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.

DISCUSSION
State law requires that cities adopt investment guidelines and the City's investment policy further requires that the City Treasurer render the policy to City Council for review when any
changes are made, or at least every two years. The existing policy was last updated and approved by City Council in June 2020. The policy was provided to the City's investment advisors, PFM, for review to ensure it is in compliance with current government codes.

PFM has proposed changes to update our policy with
current government
code provisions that the Finance Director and City
Treasurer have reviewed and concur with. It is recommended City Council adopt the resolution approving the policy. See Exhibit 1 to Attachment A for the policy with changes redlined on the document.

ATTACHMENT
A. Resolution of the City Council of the City of Antioch Approving the Statement of Investment Policy
Exhibit 1 - Statement of Investment Policy
Agenda Item #
LP

ATTACHMENT A
RESOLUTION NO. 2022/**

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANTIOCH APPROVING

THE STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY
WHEREAS, California Government Code sections 53600 et seq. allow a city to make investments with money not required for immediate needs, but limits the kinds of investments that a city can make; and
WHEREAS, when investing, State law requires that the primary objective of a trustee shall be to safeguard the principal of the funds under its control; the secondary objective shall be to meet the liquidity needs of the depositor; and the third objective shall be to achieve a return on the funds under its control.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Antioch hereby approves the Statement of Investment Policy, as attached hereto as Exhibit 1.
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Antioch at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 14 th day of June 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

ABSENT:

NOES:

ELIZABETH HOUSEHOLDER

CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANTIOCH

CITY OF ANTIOCH

STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY
I. INTRODUCTION
T
he purpose of this document is to identify various policies and procedures that enhance opportunities for a prudent and systematic investment process. The initial step toward a prudent investment policy is to organize and formalize investment related activities. Related activities which comprise good cash management include accurate cash projection, the expeditious collection of revenue, the control of disbursements, cost effective banking relations, and a short term borrowing program which coordinates working capital requirements and investment opportunity.

In concert with these requirements are the many facets of an appropriate and secure short term investment program.

II
. OBJECTIVES
A. S
afety of principal is the foremost objective of the City, followed by liquidity and yield. Eac h i
nvestment transaction shall seek to first ensure that capital losses are avoided, whether they are from securities defaults or erosion of market value.

B. I
nvestment decisions should not incur unreasonable investment risks in order to obtain current investment income.

C. T
he City's investment portfolio will remain sufficiently liquid to enable the City to meet a ll ope
rating requirements which might be reasonably anticipated. This need for investment liquidity may be tempered to the extent that the City is able to issue short term notes to meet its operating requirements.

D. T
he investment portfolio shall be managed to attain a market average rate of return throughout budgetary and economic cycles, t aking into account the City's investment risk constraints and cash flow requirements, and state and local law, ordinances or resolutions that restrict the placement of short term funds.

E
. Portfolio performance will be measured against a total return index with securities with similar attributes and similar average maturity, e.g., the Merrill Lynch 1-3 Year U.S. Treasury Index.

F. T
he City's investment portfolio will be diversified to avoid incurring unreasonable and avoidable risks associated with concentrating investments in specific security types or in individual financial institutions.

G. W
hile the City will not make investments for the purpose of trading or speculation as the dominant criterion, the City Treasurer shall seek to enhance total portfolio return by means of active portfolio management. The prohibition of speculative investments precludes pursuit of gain or profit through unusual risk and precludes investments primarily directed at gains or profits from conjectural fluctuations in mar ket prices.

However, as long as the original investments can be justified by their ordinary earning power, trading in response to changes in market value or market direction is a requirement of portfolio management.

H. T
he City adheres to the guidance pr ovided by the "prudent investor rule", which states that, “when investing, reinvesting, purchasing, acquiring, exchanging, selling, or managing public funds, a trustee shall act with care, skill, prudence, and diligence under the circumstances then prevail ing, including, but not limited to, the general economic conditions and the anticipated needs of the agency, that a prudent person acting in a like capacity and familiarity with those matters would use in the conduct of funds of a like character and with l ike aims, to safeguard the principal and maintain the liquidity needs of the agency.” I. A
ll participants in the investment process shall act responsibly as custodians of the public trust.

Investment officials shall recognize that the investment portfolio is subject to public review and evaluation. The overall program shall be designed and managed with a degree of professionalism that is worthy of the public trust.

Nevertheless, in a diversified portfolio, it must be recognized that occasional measured losses are inevitable, and must be considered within the context of the overall portfolio's investment return, provided that adequate diversification has been implemented.

II
I. DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY
The responsibility for conducting the City's investment program resides with the City Treasurer, who shall establish written procedures for the o peration o f the investment program, consistent with th is investment policy.
1 6-14-20220

CITY OF ANTIOCH

STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY
2 6-14-20220
Such procedures shall include explicit delegation of authority for all investment act ivities. Transactions may be delegated to an independent investment advisor registered with the SEC who will meet at least quarterly with the City Treasurer and Finance Director to review general strategies and monitor results .

IV. P

ERMITTED INVESTMENT INSTRUMENTS
T
he City of Antioch shall strive to maintain the level of investment of all idle funds as near 100% as possible, through daily and projected c ash flow determinations. Idle cash management and investment transactions are the responsibility of the City Treasurer. The City Treasurer, or designee, is authorized to purchase the following investment instruments.

W
here this section specifies a percentage limitation for a particular security type, that percentage is applied on the date of purchase. Credit criteria listed in this section refers to the credit rating at the time the security is purchased. If an investment’s credit rating falls below the minimum rating required at the time of purchase, the City Treasurer, or designee, will perform a timely review and decide whether to sell or hold the investment.

A. U
.S. Treasury, notes, bonds, bills, or other certificates of indebtedness, or those for which the full faith and credit of the United States are pledged for the payment of principal and interes t.

B. F
ederal agency or United States government -sponsored enterprise obligations, participation, or other instruments, including those issued by or fully guaranteed as to principal and interest by federal agencies or United States government-sponsored enterprises.

C. O
bligations of the State of California or any local agency within the state, including bonds payable solely out of revenues from a revenue producing property owned, controlled or operated by the state or any local agency or by a department, board, agency or authority of the state or any local agency.

D. R
egistered treasury notes or bonds of any of the other 49 United States in addition to California, including bonds payable solely out of the revenues from a revenue -producing property owned, controlled, or operated by a state or by a department, board, agency, or authority of any of the other 49 United States, in addition to California.

E
. Repurchase Agreements. Repurchase agreements are to be used solely as short -term investments not to exceed 30 days. The City may enter into repurchase agreements with primary government securities dealers rated "A" or better by two nationally recognized rating organizations (NRSRO). Counterparties should also have (i) a short -term credit rating in the highest category by a n NRSRO; (ii) minimum assets and capital size of $25 billion in assets and $350 million in capital; (iii) five years of acceptable audited financial results; and (iv) a strong reputation among market participants.

T
he following collateral restrictio ns will be observed: Only U.S. Treasury securities or Federal Agency securities will be acceptable collateral. All securities underlying repurchase agreements must be delivered to the City's custodian bank versus payment or be handled under a properly exe cuted tri-party repurchase ag
reement. The total market value of all collateral for each repurchase agreement must equal or exceed 102% of the total dollar value of the money invested by the City for the term of the investment. For any repurchase agreemen t with a term of more than one day, the value of the underlying securities must be reviewed on an on-going basis according to market conditions. Market value must be calculated each tim e th
ere is a substitution of collateral.

T
he City or its trustee shall have a perfected first security interest under the Uniform Commercial Code in all securities subject to repurchase agreement. The City shall have properly executed a SIFMA agreement with each counter party with which it enters into repurchase agreements.

F. B
ills of exchange or time drafts drawn on and accepted by a commercial bank, otherwise known as bankers' acceptances. Purchases of bankers' acceptances may not exceed 180 days' maturity, or 40% of the City's surplus money that may be invested. Eligible bankers' acceptances are restricted to issuing financial institutions with short-term paper rated in the highest category by an NRSRO.

CITY OF ANTIOCH

STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY
3 6-14-20220
G. C
ommercial paper of "prime" quality of the hig hest ranking or of the highest letter and number rating as provided for by a n NRSRO. The entity that issues the commercial paper shall meet all of the following conditions in either paragraph (1) or paragraph (2) below:

1. T
he entity meets the following criteria: (A) is organized and operating in the United States as a general corporation. (B) has total assets in excess of five hundred million dollars ($500,000,000). (C) ha
s debt other than commerc ial paper, if any, that is rated in a rating category of "A" or its equivalent or higher by an NRSRO.

2. T
he entity meets the following criteria: (a) is organized within the United States as a special purpose corporation, trust, or limited liability company . (b) Has program wide credit enhancements including, but not limited to, over collateralization, letters of credit, or surety bo nd. (c) Has commercial paper that is rated "A-1", or its equivalent or higher by an NRSRO.

Eligible commercial paper shall h ave a maximum maturity of 270 days or less. The City may invest no more than 2540% of its money in eligible commercial paper , and the City may purchase no more than 10% of the outstanding commercial paper of any single issuer. If the City ’s investable assets fall below $10 0 million, the City may invest no more than 25% of its money in eligible commercial paper.

H. Medium term notes with a maximum maturity of five years issued by corporations organized and operating within the United States or by depository institutions licensed by the United States or any state and operating within the United States shall be rated in a rating category of “A” or its equivalent or better by an NRSRO. Purchases of medium term notes may not exceed 30% of the City's portfolio.

I. FD
IC-insured or fully collateralized time certificates of deposit in financial institutions located in California, including U.S. b ranches o f foreign banks licensed to do business in California. All time deposits must be collateralized in accordance with California Gov ernment Code Section 53561, either a t 150%
by promissory notes secured by first mortgages and first trust deeds upon improved residential property in California eligible under Section (m) or at 110% by eligible marketable securities listed in Subsections (a) through (l) and (n) and (o). To be eligible to receive local agency deposits, a financial institution must have r eceived a m inimum overall satisfactory rating for meeting the credit needs of California Communities its most recent evaluation.

J. N
egotiable Certificates of Deposit issued by a nationally or state -chartered bank or a state or federal savings and loan assoc iation, a state or federal credit union, or by a federally - or state-licensed branch of a foreign bank. Purchases of negotiable certificates of deposit may not exceed 30% of the City's surplus money.

1. C
ertificates with maturities up to one year shall have an “A-1”rating, or its equivalent or higher, as pr
ovided for by an NRSRO.

2. C
ertificates with maturities greater than one year and through five years shall be rated in a r ating cat
egory of “A,” its equivalent or better by an NRSRO.

K. S
tate of California 's Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF). Investment in LAIF may not exceed the am
ount specified by the State Treasurer.

1. T
he LAIF portfolio should be reviewed periodically.

L
. California Asset Management Program (CAMP).

M
. Shares of beneficial interest issued by diversified management companies that are money market funds registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (1 5 U
.S.C. Sec. 80a-1, et seq.). To be eligible for investment pursuant to this subdivision the se companies shall e
ither:

CITY OF ANTIOCH

STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY
4 6-14-20220

1. Attain the highest ranking letter or numerical rating provided by not less than two of the three largest NRSROs or

2. Ha
ve an investment advisor registered or exempt from regist ration with the Securities and Exchange Commission with not less than five years experience managing money market mutual funds and with assets under management in excess of $500,000,000.

T
he purchase price of shares shall not exceed 20 percent of the investment portfolio of the City.

N. A
ny mortgage pass -through security, collateralized mortgage obligation, mortgage -backed or other pay- through bond, equipment lease -back certificate, consumer receivable pass -through certificate, or consumer receivable-backed bond of a maximum of five years maturity. Eligible securities shall be rated in a rating category of “AA” or its equivalent or better by an NRSRO, and have a maximum remaining maturity of five years or less. No more than 20 percent of the agency's surplus funds may be invested in this type of security.

O. U
nited States dollar denominated senior unsecured unsubordinated obli gations issued or unconditionally guaranteed by the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), International Finance Corporation (IFC), or Inter -American Development Bank (IADB), with a maximum remaining maturity of five years or less, and eligible for purchase and sale within the United States. Investments unde r thi s s
ubdivision shall be rated in a rating category of “AA” or its equivalent or better by an NRSRO.

P
urchases of these securities shall not exceed 30 percent of the investment portfolio of the City.

P. I
nsured savings account or money market account. To be eligible to receive local agency deposits, a financial institution must have received a minimum overall satisfactory rating for meeting the credit needs of California Communities in its most recent evaluation.

V. P

ROHIBITED INVESTMENTS
A
ny security type or structure not specifically approved by this policy i s he reby specifically prohibited.

Security types which are thereby prohibited include, but are not limited to:

1. R
everse repurchase agreements.

2. T
he City shall not invest any funds in inverse f loaters, range notes, or interes t only strips that are derived from a pool of mortgages, or in any security that coul d result in zero interest accrual if held to maturity.

3. The City will not invest in any companies that produce alcohol for public consumpti on or tobacco products.

3. Notwithstanding the prohibitions stated in the above paragraph, the City may invest in secu rities issued by, or backed by, the United States government that could result in zero- or negative-interest accrual if held to maturity, in the event of, and for the duration of, a period of negative market interest rates. The City may hold these instruments until their maturity dates.

V
I. MATURITY
I nvestment maturities s hall be based on a review of cash flow forecasts. Maturities will be scheduled as to permit the City to meet all projected obligations. No investment shall be made in any security, other than a security underlying a repurchase or reverse repurchase agreement as authorized by this section that at the time of the investment has a term remaining to maturity in excess of five years unless City Council has provided approval for a specific purpose a t least thre e months before the investment is made . The City Co uncil has approved agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS) as permitted by Section IV.B. of this Policy to have a final maturity longer than five years. The weighted average life (WAL) of agency MBS may not exceed five years.

CITY OF ANTIOCH

STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY
5 6-14-20220
V
II. DIVERSIFICATION
I
t is City policy to diversify the investment portfolio in order to reduce the risk of loss resulting from other concentration of assets in a specific maturity, a specific issuer, or a specific class of securities. The following strategies and constraints shall apply:

A. M
aturities shall be selected which provide for stability of income and reasonable liquidity.

B. C
oncern for liquidity shall be insured through practices that include covering the next vendor disbursement date and payroll date through maturing investments.

C. R
isks of market price volatility shall be controlled through the appropriate management of the portfolio’s duration versus the benchmark duration. Whereby duration is used a s a measure of the portfolio’s sensitivity to changes in interest rates which cause market price volatility.

D. S
pecific diversification limitation shall be imposed on the portfolio as follows:

1. The portfolio’s duration should be appropr iately positioned rela tive to benchmark duration during rising and falling interest rate environments.

2. E
xcept for fully collateralized deposits , investments in pooled funds such as LAIF, CAMP, and money market funds, instruments of the U.S. Governme nt or its Agencies and securities issued by the IBRD, IFC, and IADB, no more than 5% of the overall portfolio may be invested in the securities of a single financial institution.

3. I
n accordance with California statutes, City deposits including collate ralized certificates of deposit shall not exceed the total paid up capit al (to include capital notes and debentures) and surplus of any depository bank, or the total of the net worth of any savings and loan association.

V
III. RISK TOLERANCE
T
he City recognizes that investmen t risks can result from issuer defaults, market pr ice changes or various technical complications leading to temporary illiquidity. Portfolio diversification is employed as a way to control risk. No individual investment transaction shall be u ndertaken which jeopardizes the total capital position of the overall portfolio. The City Treasurer shall periodically establish guidelines and strategies to control risks of default, market price changes and illiquidity.

I
n addition to these general policy considerations, the following specific policies will be strictly observed.

A. A
ll investment funds will be placed directly with qualified financial institutions. The City will not deposit or invest funds through third parties or money brokers.

B. A
ll transactions will be executed on a delivery versus payment bas is with one exception: Upon the City's receipt of an account number from an authorized official, a California savings and loan institution and Bay Area banks shall have 48 hours from the t ransaction settlement date in which to deliver the certificate of deposit for a collateralized deposit to the City's safekeeping, even though payment is made by the City on the settlement date.

C. A
competitive bid process, utilizing a minimum of three f inancial institutions deemed eligible by the City's Investment Advisor, will be used to place all investment purchases. Based on a quarterly evaluation, securities dealers, banks and other financial institutions will be dropped or continued on t he eligibility list. The following criteria will be used in the quarterly evaluation:

1. N
umber of transactions competitively won.

2. Prompt and accurate confirmation of transactions.

3. Efficient securities delivery.

4. A ccurate market information account servicing.

CITY OF ANTIOCH

STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY
6 6-14-20220
D.

The City Treasurer shall forward a copy of and updates to the City's Investment Policy to the City's Investment Advisor and require written acknowledgment of the Policy.

IX. S

AFEKEEPING AND CUSTODY
T
o protect against potential fraud and embezzlement, the assets of the City shall be held in the City's v ault or
secured through third party custody and safekeeping procedures. City Treasurer or designee shall be bonded to protect the public against possible embezzlement and malfeasance. Saf ekeeping procedures shall be reviewed annually by an independe nt au ditor. The auditor may conduct surprise audits of safekeeping and custodial procedures.

A
ll securities will be received and delivered using standard delivery versus payment proc edures.

X
. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
T
he City Treasurer shall render to the C ity Council at least a quarterly investment report, which shall include, at a minimum, the following information for each individual investment:

1. T
ype of investment instrument (i.e., Treasury Bill, medium term note);

2. Issuer name (i.e., General Electric Credit Corporation);

3. Purchase date (trade and settlement date);

4. Maturity date;

5. Par value;

6. Purchase price;

7. Current market value and the source of the valuation;

8. Overall portfolio yield based on cost.

T
he quarterly report also shall (a) state compliance of the portfolio to the statement of investment policy, or manner in which the portfolio is not in compliance; (b) include a description of any of the City's funds, investmen ts, or programs that are under the management of c ontracted parties, including lending programs; and (c) include a statement denoting the ability of the City to meet its expenditure requirements for the next six months, or provide an explanation as to why sufficient money shall, or may, not be available.

T
he Treasurer will submit to City Council a monthly report of investment transactions.

X
I. INVESTMENT POLICY REVIEW
T
he Statement of Investment Policy shall be reviewed annually by the City Treasurer and shall be rendered to the City Council at a public meeting when any changes are proposed or at least every two years.

X
II. INTERNAL CONTROLS
T
he Finance Director and Treasurer are responsible for establishing and maintaining an internal control structure designed to ensure that the financial assets of the City are protected from loss, theft, fraud and misuse.

X
III. INVESTMENT POOLS/MUTUAL FUNDS
T
he Treasurer will perform due diligence reviews of pools and funds prior to inve sting, and on a continual basis.

Submitted to:

City of Antioch
Prepared by:

Interwest Consulting Group, Inc.

Engineering and Traffic Survey
APRIL 14, 2022
ATTACHMENT "C"
2022 E&TS TRAFFIC ENGINEER’S CERTIFICATION

INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP Page | iii

TRAFFIC ENGINEER’S CERTIFICATION

I, Ruth Smith, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey dated April 14, 2022, has been prepared in accordance with procedures established by the State of California and conform to Sections 627 of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and Section 2B.13 of the latest edition of t he State of California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, in order to establish and update speed limits. This Engineering and Traffic Survey is intended to satisfy the requirements of Section 40802 of the CVC to enable the continued use of radar or other electronic devices for tra ffic speed enforcement. This Engineering and Traffic Survey contains recommended speed limits for thirty-five (35) roadway segments in the City of Antioch and was prepared under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I certify that I am experienced in performing surveys of this type and that I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Traffic Engineer.

_____________________________________ _____________________________ Ruth M. Smith, TE, PTP Date Traffic Engineer
RTE 1650, Exp. 9/30/22

2022 E&TS TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP Page | v

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION PAGE

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1

2.0 STUDY METHODOLOGY 4

3.0 SURVEY RESULTS 8

3.1 Spot Speed Radar Survey 8

3.2 Collision Rate Analysis 12

3.3 Roadway Segment Field Review 17

4.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 18

LIST OF TABLES

TABLE PAGE
1 Segment Spot Speed Summary 9-10
2 Segment Statewide Average Collision Rates 13-14
3 Collision Analysis 15-16
4 Roadway Segments with Recommended Changes to Speed Limit 18-19

LIST OF FIGURES

FIGURE PAGE
1 Recommended Speed Limits Map 11

APPENDIX
A Regulations Governing Speed Limits (Excerpts from the California Vehicle Code) B Speed Zoning Regulations from the Caltrans California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices and Definitions of Terms
C Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary Sheets
D Speed Survey Data Sheets
E Radar/Lidar Gun and Operator(s) Certifications
2022 E&TS I N T R O D U C T I O N

INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP Page | 1

SECTION 1.0

INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this report is to document t he results of an engineering and traffic survey conducted to update and to establish the speed limits for thirty-five (35) street segments in the City of Antioch. The study was conducted to comply with existing State regulations concerning the increasing or decreasing of speed limits within City boundaries.

Posted speed limits are established to inform drivers of the safe speed limit and to protect the general public from reckless and unpredictable behavior of irresponsible drivers. Research has shown that most drivers travel at speeds that are safe and reasonable, therefore, speed limits are established primarily on the consensus of the majority of those who use the roads. Speed limits are not based on the actions of few. The California Vehicle Code requires the limits to be established on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey rather than by arbitrary methods.

Posted speed limits also provide law enforce ment with a clearly understood method of identifying and apprehending violators of the Basic Speed Law (CVC Section 22350), which states: No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather , visibility, the tr affic on, and the surface and width of the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.

The posted speed limit gives drivers a clear warning of the maximum speed that is reasonable and prudent under typical driving conditions.

It is generally accepted that speed limits can not be successfully enforced without voluntary compliance by a majority of drivers. Consequently, only the driver whose behavior is clearly out of line with the normal flow of traffic is usually targeted for enforcement.

This report contains sufficient information to document that the conditions of the latest edition of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 627 have been satisfied and that other conditions not readily apparent to a motorist are properly identified. To legally use radar for speed enforcement, Section 40802(b) of the CVC requires that limits be established per Sections 22357 and 22358 of the CVC, the limits must be justified by an Engineering and Traffic Survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation. Section 40802(c) of the CVC allows cities to extend the survey period up to seven or f rourteen years depending on specific criteria. Details of these CVC criteria are provided in Appendix A. CVC Section 627 also requires that the Engineering and Traffic Survey be conducted in accordance with the latest edition of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD). Details of these CA MUTCD criteria are provided in Appendix B.

In 2015, the City Council approved the establishment and update of speed limits on various street segments in Antioch, based on an Engineering and Traffic Survey. In order to ensure speed limits are appropriate and enforceable, thirty-five (35) of the street segments were identified as requiring a resurvey. Accordingly, this Engineering and Traffic Survey has been prepared to update the speed limits for the following street segments:

2022 E&TS I N T R O D U C T I O N

INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP Page | 2

1. W. 2 nd Street between L Street and G Street

2. W. 4 th Street between L Street and C Street

3. W. 6 th Street between L Street and A Street

4. W. 10 th Street between Auto Center Drive and L Street

5. E 18 th Street between A Street and Hillcrest Avenue

6. E 18 th Street between Hillcrest Avenue and East City Limits

7. Auto Center Drive between 4 th Street and 10th Street

8. Auto Center Drive between SPRR and SR-4

9. Buchanan Road between City Limits and Somersville Road

10. Buchanan Road between Somersville Road and Lucena Way

11. Buchanan Road between Lucena Way and Contra Loma Boulevard

12. Cavallo Road between E. Tregallas Road and 18th Street

13. Cavallo Road between 18th Street and Wilbur Avenue

14. Dallas Ranch Road between Lone Tree Way and Mokelomne Drive

15. Deer Valley Road between Hillcrest Avenue and Lone Tree Way

16. Deer Valley Road between Lone Tree Way and Sand Creek Road

17. Delta Fair Boulevard between West City Limit and Belle Drive

18. Delta Fair Boulevard between Kendree Street and Somersville Road

19. Delta Fair Boulevard between Somersville Road and Buchanan Road

20. Garrow Drive between E. Tregallas Road and Davison Drive

21. Hillcrest Avenue between 18th Street and Sunset Drive

22. Hillcrest Avenue between Sunset Drive and Davison Drive

23. Hillcrest Avenue between Davison Drive and Lone Tree Way

24. James Donlon Boulevard between Somersville Road and Contra Loma Boulevard

25. James Donlon Boulevard between Contra Loma Boulevard and Lone Tree Way

26. Lone Tree Way between SR-4 and Putnam Street

27. Lone Tree Way between Putnam Street and James Donlon Boulevard

28. Lone Tree Way between James Donlon Boulevard and Deer Valley Road

29. Lone Tree Way between Deer Valley Road and East City Limits

30. Pittsburg-Antioch (W. 10
th Street) between West City Limits and Auto Center Drive

31. Somersville Road between SR-4 and Buchanan Road

32. Wilbur Avenue between Cavallo Road and 1600 ft east of Minaker Drive

33. Wilbur Avenue between 1600 ft east of Minaker Drive and East City Limits 2022 E&TS I N T R O D U C T I O N

INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP Page | 3

34. Wild Horse Road between Hillcrest Avenue and Wild Horse Road Easterly Terminus

35. Worrell Road between Lone Tree Way and Garrow Drive

Spot speed surveys were taken at thirty-fiv e (35) locations on the City’s network, in conformance with the State law for conducting engineering and traffic surveys, for the purpose of establishing/updating prima facie speed limits. The data was collected in accordance with the latest edition of the CA MUTCD 2014 (rev 6). Sections of the CA MUTCD that contain the regulations for conducting t he required “Engineering and Traffic Survey” are presented in Appendix B. Also in Appendix B are definitions of terms us ed in speed z one surveys. As previously noted, excerpts fr om the CVC regarding regulati ons governing speed limits are presented in Appendix A. It should be noted that the excerpts reflect changes and additions to the CVC due to Assembly Bill 43, which took effect on January 1, 2022. The results of the analysis are summarized for each roadway segmen t in Appendix C. Th e speed zone radar surveys in Appendix D were c onducted by National Data & Surveying Services (NDS).

Certifications for their staff and equipment are provided in Appendix E.

Based on the data and results obtained in this Engineering and Traffic Survey, recommendations have been made to either maintain, increase, or decrease the existing speed limits for the selected thirty-five (35) roadwa y segments within the City of Antioch. The recommended speed limits are summarized in Table 1 and illustrated on Figure 1.

2022 E&TS STUDY METHODOLOGY

INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP Page | 4

SECTION 2.0

STUDY METHODOLOGY
The basic fundamentals for establishing speed limits recognize that the majority of drivers behave in a safe and reasonable manner, and, therefore, the normally careful and competent actions of a reasonable driver should be considered legal. Speed limits established on the fundamentals conform to the consensus that those who drive the highway determine what speed is reasonable and safe, not on the judgement of one or a few individuals. A radar spot speed survey is usually used to record the prevailing speed of reasonable drivers.

Speed zones are established to inform drivers of the safe sp eed limit and to protect the general public from unreasonable and reckless drivers. Research has shown that most drivers travel at speeds that are safe an d reasonable, therefor e, speed limits are established primarily on the consensus of the majority of those who use the roads. Speed limits are not based on the actions of few. The California Vehicle Code requires the limits to be established on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey rather than by arbitrary methods.

Speed limits are also established to advise drivers of conditions which may not be readily apparent to a reasonable driver. For this reason, collision history, roadway conditions, traffic characteristics and land use must also be analyzed before determining speed limits.

The engineering and traffic survey involved the three major elements of data collection and analysis, as required by California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 627 and as outlined in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD), 2014 Edition, rev 6.

The three elements of an Engineering and Traffic Survey, as described in the CVC, are:

1. Prevailing speed as determi ned by a spot speed survey

2. Collision records

3. Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver

Spot Speed Survey. Spot speed surveys, performed by a certified radar technician utilizing a calibrated radar gun, were conducted for thirty-five (35) roadway segments to determine existing vehicular travel speeds. A minimum of 100 observations were recorded, 50 for each direction of travel, on all the survey ed street segments. This data was used to calculate statistical information such as the 85th percentile speed, 10 mile per hour pace speed, percent of vehicles within the 10 mile per hour pace, median speed and other pertinent data for analysis. The 85th percentile speed is t he speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is traveling. This threshold represents what is historically found to be a safe and reasonable speed fo r most drivers based on the r oadway conditions that are present.

Collision Rate. Mid-block traffic collision data for the thirty-five (35) roadway segments was tabulated from the City’s and County’s coll ision records as reported to the Statewide

2022 E&TS STUDY METHODOLOGY

INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP Page | 5
Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) for the period from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2020 (three years) . The collision rate was ca lculated and considered in recommending the speed limit.

Field Review. The streets were field reviewed to determine/confirm the existing roadway characteristics, condition a nd placement of signs and ma rkings, adjacent land uses, pedestrian and bicycle activity, and to identify roadway characteristics that are not readily apparent to vehicle drivers.

Analysis. The three elements described above were used to determine the recommended speed limit. The analysis began with the 85th percentile speed from the spot speed survey and was modified, as appropriate, by the collision rate and existing conditions not readily apparent to the driver.

The speed limit is initially established at the nearest 5 mph increment to the 85th percentile speed. It can then be reduced by 5 mph if it meets one of the following two options:

Option 1. CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5 allo w the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85 th percentile speed under certain circumstances.

Option 2. For cases where the nearest 5 mph increment would require rounding up, CVC Section 21400(b) allows the speed limit to be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th perc entile speed, however, no further reduction is allowed.

The following examples explain the use of these speed limit criteria:

A. Using Option 1, when the 85th percent ile speed is rounded down (i.e. the 85th percentile speed is 37 mph, so the speed limit would be established at 35 mph), the speed limit could be reduced another 5 mph, to 30 mph, if the special conditions are met and justification fo r using the lower speed limit are documented in the engineering and traffic survey.

B. Using Option 1, when the 85th perc entile speed is rounded up (i.e. the 85th percentile speed is 38 mph, so the speed limit would be established at 40 mph), the speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph, to 35 mph, if the special conditions are met and justification for using the lower speed limit are documented in the engineering and traffic survey.

C. Using Option 2, when the 85th perc entile speed is rounded up (i.e. the 85th percentile speed is 38 mph and would normally be rounded up to 40 mph), instead of rounding up, the speed limit can be reduced by 5 mph (established at 35 mph), but no further reduction can be applied.

In accordance with the State-imposed speed limit establishment regulation, the Engineering and Traffic Survey, as defined in CVC Section 627 and described in detail in the California MUTCD 2014, Section 2B.13 (see Appendices A and B, respectively), there are several factors that may 2022 E&TS STUDY METHODOLOGY

INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP Page | 6
be considered to justify setting the prima faci e speed limit five mph below the rounded 85th percentile speed under Option 1.

The factors that may be consider ed are highway, traffic, and ro adside conditions, specifically including those listed below, however, factors that are readily apparent to motorists are not to be considered.

 Most recent collisio n record (mid-block)
 Roadway characteristics
 Shoulder condition
 Grade
 Alignment
 Sight Distance
 Roadside development and environment
 Parking practices a nd pedestrian activity
 Commercial driveway ch aracteristics (land use)
 Pedestrian traffic with and without sidewalks
 Pedestrian and Bicycle safety
 Residential density

The above factors for each roadway segment surveyed are listed in the Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary sheets in Appendix C.

In addition to the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Caltrans publishes the California Manual for Setting Speed Limits. For divided highways with the same alignment in both directions, the California Manual for Setting Speed Limits notes that the speed limit for both directions may be set based on the greater 85th percentile speed of the two directions (a divided highway has a barrier that separates the two directions of traffic, such as a raised or painted median). This is the City’s preferred methodology and is the basis of the recommended speed limits for the divided roadways. Of the 35 analyzed segments, 22 are predominantly divided. In Table 1, the 85th percentile speeds shown for the divided roadways are the greater of the two directions, and the divided roadways are indicated with an asterisk next to the segment number.

The 85th percentile speeds for both directions are provided in the Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary sheets in Appendix C.

The 85th percentile speed and the factors noted above were considered in verifying existing speed limits and recommending speed limit changes (increase or decrease). Additionally, discussions were held with City staff in making decisions with respect to changing existing speed limits. This allowed for consideration of any special knowledge of the segment. Table 1 shows the surveyed road segments with posted and recommended speed limits. The 2018-2020 Collision Survey Analysis in Table 2 lists each segment’s daily traffic volumes, total number of collisions and calculated collision rate.

Speed Limit Signing. All California motorists are required to know the basic 15, 25, and 55 MPH speed laws and are tested on the subject when applying for a driver’s license. Consequently, 2022 E&TS STUDY METHODOLOGY

INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP Page | 7
speed limit signs covering th ese conditions need not be posted on City streets. However, although not required by law, speed limit signs for these situations may be posted on streets that have significant daily vehicular traffic volumes, a by-pass traffic situation, the continued violation of a residential 25 MPH speed zone, or with other applicable warrants.

It is a common policy to recommend the posting of speed limit signs only on streets that have been covered by the City speed limit ordinance or by the warranted situations covered above.

Speed limit signs should be installed at about one-half mile intervals on the City streets which have been speed zoned. Signs are normally installed on the exit side of traffic signal controlled intersections and the more important intersections where there is high side street vehicle entry.

It is important that motorists be given adequate information while not over signing, which tends to confuse the motorist.

Enforcement issues can occur when, (a) the highway is posted with inappropriate speed limit signs, (b) the highway is improperly or inadequately posted; or, (c) the highway is not posted nor covered by ordinance and therefore falls under the basic speed law. In any of these events, the result is a debatable validity that may be questioned in court cases where citations are issued and contested.
2022 E&TS SURVEY RESULTS

INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP Page | 8

SECTION 3.0

SURVEY RESULTS

3.1 Spot Speed Radar Survey

Spot speed radar surveys were conducted at each street segment to establish a reasonable and effective speed limit based on the premise that the speed limit thus established conforms to the actual behavior of t he majority of motorists. The speed limit should normally be established at the five mile per hour in crement nearest the 85th percentile speed, as recorded for the surveyed segment. Howeve r, engineering judgment and other factors such as collision rates (Section 3.2) and Roadway Segment Field Review (Section 3.3) may indicate the need for further reduction in establishing reasonable and effective speed limits.

Table 1 shows the existing speed limit an d the 85th percentile speed for each studied segment.

The criteria used to conduct the radar survey are listed in Appendices A and B.

Appendix D contains the Speed Survey Data sheets for each of the thirty-five (35) segments surveyed. The data collected and in formation calculated for the radar speed survey are as follows:

 Date and time of speed survey
 Posted speed limit
 Weather conditions
 Number of vehicles observed
 Speed of each surveyed vehicle
 50th percentile speed
 85th percentile speed
 10 mph pace speed
 Number of vehicles in pace
 Percent in pace speed
 Percent and number below pace speed
 Percent and number above pace speed

The summary contains information about vehi cular speed data observed, collision data, street classification, and any unusual conditions at the location.

2022 E&TS S U R V E Y R E S U L T S

INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP P a g e | 9

Table 1: Segment Spot Speed Summary

No Street Between Roadway
Classification Lanes1
Existing
Speed
Limit
(mph)
85th%ile
Speed
(mph)2
Recommended
Speed Limit
(mph)2
Comments3
1 W. 2nd St. L St. & G St. Collector 2U 25 31 25 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 2 W. 4th St. L St. & C. St. Collector 2U 25 29 25 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 3 W. 6th St. L St. & A St. Local 2U 25 32 25 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 4* W. 10th St.* Auto Center Dr. & L St. Arterial 4D 35 42 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 5 E. 18th St. A St. & Hillcrest Ave. Arterial 4U 30 42 35 Increase - 85th%ile, Option 1 6 Hillcrest Ave. & East City Limits Arterial 4D/4U 45 50 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 7* Auto Center Dr. 4th St. & 10th St. Arterial 4D 35 42 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 8* SPRR & SR-4 Arterial 5D/6D 35 42 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 9 Buchanan Rd. City Limits & Somersville Rd. Arterial 2U/2D/ 4D
45 49 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2
10* Somersville Rd. & Lucena Wy. Arterial 4D 35 40 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 11* Lucena Wy. & Contra Loma Blvd. Arterial 4D 35 41 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 12 Cavallo Rd. E. Tregallas Rd. & 18th St. Collector 2U 25 37 30 Increase - 85th%ile, Option 1 13 18th St. & Wilbur Ave. Collector 2U 35 41 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 14* Dallas Ranch Rd. Lone Tree Wy. & Mokelomne Dr. Arterial 4D 45 48 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 15* Deer Valley Rd. Hillcrest Ave. & Lone Tree Wy. Arterial 4D 45 52 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 16* Lone Tree Wy. & Mammoth Dr. Arterial 4D 45 51 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 17* Delta Fair Blvd. City Limits & Belle Dr. Arterial 4D 35 41 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 18* Kendree S t. & Somersville Rd. Arterial 4D 30 36 30 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 19 Somersville Rd . & Buchanan Rd. Arterial 4U 30 37 30 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 20 Garrow Dr. E. Tregallas Rd & Davison Dr. Collector 2U 25 25 25 No Change - 85th%ile 21* Hillcrest Ave. 18th St. & Sunset Dr. Arterial 4D 40 45 40 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 22* Sunset Dr. & Davison Dr. Arterial 6D 45 46 40 Decrease - 85th%ile, Option 1 23* Davison Dr. & Lone Tree Wy. Arterial 4D 45 46 40 Decrease - 85th%ile, Option 1 24* James Donlon
Blvd.

Somersville Rd. & Contra Loma Blvd. Arterial 4D 40 52 45 Increase - 85th%ile, Option 1 25* Contra Loma Blvd. & Lone Tree Wy. Arterial 4D 40 47 40 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 1 D = Divided Roadway, U = Undivided Roadway
2 For divided roadways, the greater 85th percentile speed for the two directions, which is shown here, was used to determine the speed limit. See Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary Sheets in Appendix C for both 85th percentile speeds. Study roadways that are predominantly divided, are marked with an asterisk next to the segment number. 3 See Appendix B, 12a, for explanation of Option 1 and Option 2. 2022 E&TS S U R V E Y R E S U L T S

INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP P a g e | 1 0

Table 1: Segment Spot Speed Summary
(Continued)

No Street Between Roadway
Classification Lanes1
Existing
Speed
Limit
(mph)
85th%ile
Speed
(mph)2
Recommended
Speed Limit
(mph)2
Comments3
26* Lone Tree Wy. SR-4 & Putnam St. Arterial 4D 35 40 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 27* Putnam St. & James Donlon Blvd. Arterial 4D/5D 35 45 40 Increase - 85th%ile, Option 1 28* James Donlon Blvd. & Deer Valley Rd. Arterial 6D 45 51 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 29* Deer Valley Rd. & East City Limits Arterial 6D 45 51 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 30 Pittsburg-Antioch
(W. 10th St)
West City Limits & Auto Center Dr. Arterial 2U 50 53 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 31* Somersville Rd. SR-4 & Buchanan Rd. Arterial 5D/4D 35 37 35 No Change - 85th%ile 32* Wilbur Ave. Cavallo Rd. & 1600 ft. east of Minaker Dr. Arterial 4D 40 47 40 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 33 1600 ft. east of Minaker Dr. & East City
Limits
Arterial 2U/2D 45 52 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1
34* Wild Horse Rd. Hillcrest Ave. & Wild Horse Rd Easterly Terminus
Collector 4D/2D 45 49 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 35 Worrell Rd. Lone Tree Wy. & Garrow Dr. Collector 2U 25 31 25 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 1 D = Divided Roadway, U = Undivided Roadway
2 For divided roadways, the greater 85th percentile speed for the two directions, which is shown here, was used to determine the speed limit. See Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary Sheets in Appendix C for both 85th percentile speeds. Study roadways that are predominantly divided, are marked with an asterisk next to the segment number. 3 See Appendix B, 12a, for explanation of Option 1 and Option 2.

2022 E&TS S U R V E Y R E S U L T S

INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP P a g e | 1 1

Figure 1: Recommended Speed Limits Map

2022 E&TS SURVEY RESULTS

INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP Page | 12

3.2 Collision Rate Analysis

A greater-than-expected collision rate is one of the special conditions under Option 1, allowing the speed limit to be established 5 mph lower than the rounded speed limit. The collision rate is based on mid-block collisions only. It is determined using the equation shown below and is then compared to the statewide average co llision rate for si milar roadways, found in Collision Data on California State Highways (roads miles, travel, collisions) published by Caltrans every two years. The latest edition, 2018, was used for this 2021 analysis.

The mid-block collision rate for each roadway segment was determined by using the most recent collision records as required by CV C Section 627. Traffic collision data for the roadway segments was collected from the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) collision records for the City of Antioch from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2020. Based on this data, the mid-block collisi on rates were calculated for each roadway segment in terms of “collisions per 1,000,000 vehicle miles of travel.”

It was then determined if any of the collision rates warranted an additional 5 mph reduction in the rounded 85th percentile speed per Option 1. The collision rates were compared to the statewide average collision rates for sim ilar roadways. All of the calculated roadway segment collision rates were less than the statewide average, indicating no segments qualified for the additional 5 mph reduction.

The collision rates are calculated using the following equation:

Collision Rate = Number of Midblock collisions x 10 6
24-hour volume x 365 x segment length x number of years

Where: Number of mid-block collisions based on 3 years (January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2020), 24- hour traffic volume (both directions) in the survey segment and segment length in miles. Rates are shown in Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles (per year) or Col/MVM.

The results of the collision rate calculations are shown in Table 2 and in the Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary sheets (Appendix C). A sample collision rate calculation is shown below.

Example:

Collision rate on: A Street between 18
th Street and SR-4:

Collision Rate = 1 x 10 6
19,111 x 365 x 1.00 x 3
= 0.10 collisions per million vehicle miles (Col/MVM)

2022 E&TS SURVEY RESULTS

INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP Page | 13
The comparison collision rates vary from year to year. The 2018 Statewide average rates, which are the most recent rates available, were used for the thirty-five (35) segments studied in the 2021 analysis, and are as follows:

Table 2: Segment Statewide Average Collision Rates

No Street Between
Statewide
Average
Collision
Rate
1 W. 2nd St. L St. & G St. 1.60
2 W. 4th St. L St. & C. St. 1.60
3 W. 6th St. L St. & A St. 1.60
4 W. 10th St. Auto Center Dr. & L St. 0.91
5 E. 18th St. A St. & Hillcrest Ave. 0.93
6 Hillcrest Ave. & East City Limits 0.93
7 Auto Center Dr. 4th St. & 10th St. 0.91
8 SPRR & SR-4 0.91
9 Buchanan Rd. City Limits & Somersville Rd. 0.62
10 Somersville Rd. & Lucena Wy. 0.91
11 Lucena Wy. & Contra Loma Blvd. 0.91
12 Cavallo Rd.

E. Tregallas Rd. & 18th St. 1.60
13 18th St. & Wilbur Ave. 1.60
14 Dallas Ranch Rd. Lone Tree Wy. & Mokelomne Dr. 0.91
15 Deer Valley Rd.

Hillcrest Ave. & Lone Tree Wy. 0.91
16 Lone Tree Wy. & Sand Creek Rd.. 0.91
17 Delta Fair Blvd. City Limits & Belle Dr. 0.93
18 Kendree St. & Somersville Rd. 0.93
19 Somersville Rd. & Buchanan Rd. 0.93
20 Garrow Dr. E. Tregallas Rd & Davison Dr. 1.60
21 Hillcrest Ave. 18th St. & Sunset Dr. 0.91
22 Sunset Dr. & Davison Dr. 0.91
23 Davison Dr. & Lone Tree Wy. 0.91
24 James Donlon Blvd. Somersville Rd. & Contra Loma Blvd. 0.91 25 Contra Loma Blvd. & Lone Tree Wy. 0.91
26 Lone Tree Wy. SR-4 & Putnam St. 0.91
27 Putnam St. & James Donlon Blvd. 0.91
28 James Donlon Blvd. & Deer Valley Rd. 0.98
29 Deer Valley Rd. & East City Limits 0.98
30 Pittsburg-Antioch (W. 10th St) West City Limits & Auto Center Dr. 1.60 31 Somersville Rd. SR-4 & Buchanan Rd. 0.91

2022 E&TS SURVEY RESULTS

INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP Page | 14

Table 2: Segment Statewide Average Collision Rates
(Continued)

No Street Between
Statewide
Average
Collision
Rate
32 Wilbur Ave. Cavallo Rd. & 1600 ft. east of Minaker Dr. 0.91 33 1600 ft. east of Minaker Dr. & East City Limits 1.32 34 Wild Horse Rd. Hillcre st Ave. & Wild Horse Rd Easterly Terminus 0.91 35 Worrell Rd. Lone Tree Wy. & Garrow Dr. 1.60

Table 3, below, summarizes the collision rate analysis, and includes the factors used to calculate the collision rate fo r each segment. It also determ inations if each segment’s collision rate is greater than the statewide average rate for similar roadways, which would allow the collision rate to be used as a factor in reducing the speed limit by 5 mph based on Option 1.
2022 E&TS S U R V E Y R E S U L T S

INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP Page | 15

Table 3: Collision Analysis

No Street Between Segment Length
(mile)
Segment Length
(feet)
Average Daily
Traffic (ADT)
(vehs/day)
Midblock
Collisions1
(3 yr total)
Collision
Rate
(Col/MVM)2
Statewide
Collision
Rate
Segment
Rate More
Than
Statewide
Rate?
1 W. 2nd St. L St. & G St. 0.32 1,690 7,468 0 0.00 1.60 No 2 W. 4th St. L St. & C. St. 0.60 3,170 1,599 0 0.00 1.60 No 3 W. 6th St. L St. & A St. 0.74 3,910 1,453 0 0.00 1.60 No 4 W. 10th St. Auto Center Dr. & L St. 0.54 2,855 11,680 0 0.00 0.91 No 5 E. 18th St. A St. & Hillcrest Ave. 0.50 2,640 12,539 0 0.00 0.93 No 6 Hillcrest Ave. & East City Limits 1.93 10,190 9,462 0 0.00 0.93 No 7 Auto Center Dr. 4th St. & 10th St. 0.44 2,325 3,752 0 0.00 0.91 No 8 SPRR & SR-4 0.33 1,745 20,864 0 0.00 0.91 No
9 Buchanan Rd.

City Limits & Lucena Wy. 0.64 3,380 16,899 0 0.00 0.62 No 10 Lucena Wy. & Gentrytown Dr. 0.34 1,795 7,895 0 0.00 0.91 No 11 Gentrytown Dr. & Contra Loma Blvd. 0.93 4,910 10,338 0 0.00 0.91 No 12 Cavallo Rd. E. Tregallas Rd. & 18th St. 0.51 2,695 3,818 0 0.00 1.60 No 13 18th St. & Wilbur Ave. 0.51 2,695 4,134 0 0.00 1.60 No 14 Dallas Ranch Rd. Lone Tree Wy. & Mokelomne Dr. 1.03 5,440 6,038 0 0.00 0.91 No 15 Deer Valley Rd. Hillcrest Ave. & Lone Tree Wy. 1.85 9,770 11,563 1 0.04 0.91 No 16 Lone Tree Wy. & Sand Creek Rd. 0.81 4,280 13,030 0 0.00 0.91 No 17 Delta Fair Blvd. City Limits & Belle Dr. 0.27 1,430 10,429 0 0.00 0.93 No 18 Kendree St. & Somersville Rd. 0.54 2,855 11,885 1 0.14 0.93 No 19 Somersville Rd. & Buchanan Rd. 0.28 1,480 12,839 0 0.00 0.93 No 20 Garrow Dr. E. Tregallas Rd & Davison Dr. 0.85 4,490 2,333 0 0.00 1.60 No 21 Hillcrest Ave. 18th St. & Sunset Dr. 0.46 2,430 15,038 0 0.00 0.91 No 22 Sunset Dr. & Davison Dr. 0.55 2,905 36,441 1 0.05 0.91 No 23 Davison Dr. & Lone Tree Wy. 1.85 9,770 11,626 1 0.04 0.91 No 24 James Donlon Blvd. Somersville Rd. & Contra Loma Blvd. 1.56 8,240 9,541 0 0.00 0.91 No 25 Contra Loma Blvd. & Lone Tree Wy. 1.56 8,240 13,834 0 0.00 0.91 No 26 Lone Tree Wy. SR-4 & Putnam St. 0.33 1,745 28,215 0 0.00 0.91 No 27 Putnam St. & James Donlon Blvd. 0.91 4,805 27,014 0 0.00 0.91 No 28 James Donlon Blvd. & Deer Valley Rd. 1.80 9,505 32,115 0 0.00 0.98 No 29 Deer Valley Rd. & East City Limits 2.56 13,520 22,602 1 0.02 0.98 No 30 Pittsburg-Antioch
(W. 10th St)
West City Limits & Auto Center Dr. 0.74 3,910 9,884 0 0.00 1.60 No 31 Somersville Rd. SR-4 & Buchanan Rd. 0.54 2,855 12,365 0 0.00 0.91 No 1 Number of speed-related mid-block traffic collisions during most recently available 3-year period 2 Col/MVM = Collisions (Accidents) per Million Vehicle Miles per year; An actual rate greater than state average rate indicates condition that may allow a lower speed limit.

2022 E&TS S U R V E Y R E S U L T S

INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP Page | 16

Table 3: Collision Analysis
(Continued)

No Street Between Segment Length
(mile)
Segment Length
(feet)
Average Daily
Traffic (ADT)
(vehs/day)
Midblock
Collisions1
(3 yr total)
CollisionRate(
Col/MVM)2
Statewide
Collision
Rate
Segment
Rate More
Than
Statewide
Rate?
32 Wilbur Ave. Cavallo Rd. & 1600 ft. east of Minaker Dr. 0.59 3,115 6,782 0 0.00 0.91 No 33 1600 ft. east of Minaker Dr. & East City Limits 0.74 3,910 5,248 0 0.00 1.32 No 34 Wild Horse Rd. Hillcrest Ave. & Wild Horse Rd Easterly Terminus 0.88 4,645 3,375 0 0.00 0.91 No 35 Worrell Rd. Lone Tree Wy. & Garrow Dr. 0.53 2,800 1,506 0 0.00 1.60 No 1 Number of speed-related mid-block traffic collisions during most recently available 3-year period 2 Col/MVM = Collisions (Accidents) per Million Vehicle Miles per year; An actual rate greater than state average rate indicates condition that may allow a lower speed limit. 2022 E&TS SURVEY RESULTS

INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP Page | 17

3.3 Roadway Segment Field Review

Section 2B.13 of the CA MU TCD 2014, “Speed Limit Signs” states that the speed limit should be established at the nearest five mile per hour increment to the 85th percentile speed recorded during the spot speed survey. Ho wever, in matching existing conditions with the traffic safety needs of the community, engineering judgment may indicate the need for a further reduction in speed, as allowed under Option 1. Whenever such factors are considered to establish the speed limit, they should be documented on the speed survey or in the accompanying engineering report.

Each roadway segment was driven and video -recorded while “embedded” in prevailing traffic and assessed by a registered Civil Engineer in the State of California. The roadway characteristics, location of speed limit signs, conditions not readily apparent to the driver (lack of sidewalks/bike lanes, driveways with limited sight distance, clustered driveways, heavy truck activity, etc.), type of land use ad joining the street (commercial, residential, school zone, parks, etc.) and type of roadw ay (divided, undivided, number of lanes, on- street parking etc.) were recorded as part of the study. The roadway characteristics recorded were used to determine if any physical conditions warranted consideration of an additional five mile per hour reduction of t he recommended speed in accordance with CVC Section 627.

The results of the roadway segment field re view for each segment are indicated on the Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary sheets in Appendix C.

 Average Daily Traffic Volume
 Collision History
 Collision Rate
 Road Description, including on-street parking and unusual lane configurations  Lack of Sidewalks and Bike Lanes
 Pedestrian, Bicycle and Truck activity
 Driveways with limited sight distance or clustered driveways  Nearby schools and parks
 Adjacent land uses

2022 E&TS SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP Page | 18
SECTION 4.0

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

1. The radar survey and the raw data collection were conducted per CVC Section 627 and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, 2014, rev 6, Section 2B.13.

2. Daily traffic counts for the thirty-five (35)selected roadway segments on the City’s arterial roadway network were collected in 2021 on April 6 (15 segments), April 8 (18 segments), April 20 (13 segments) and April 22 (22 segments). Radar speed surveys were taken in 2021 on April 6 (15 segments), April 7 (20 segments), April 8 (18 segments) and April 9 (15 segments).

3. Bicycle and Pedestri an mid-block collision frequency was low.

4. A summary of recommended speed limits is provided in Table 1 and illustrated on Figure 1.

5. Based on the Engineering and Traffic Survey, it is recommended that the existing speed limits on the thirty-five (35) studied roadway segments in the City of Antioch should remain unchanged except for the six (6) roadway segments listed below.

Table 4: Roadway Segments with Recommended
Changes to Speed Limit

No. Street Between
Existing
Speed
Limit
(mph)
Recommended
Speed Limit
(mph)
Comments
5 E. 18 th Street A Street and Hillcrest Ave. 30 MPH 35 MPH Increase Speed Limit – 85th percentile,
Option 1
12 Cavallo Road E. Tregallas Road and
18th Street
25 MPH 30 MPH Increase Speed
Limit
– 85th percentile,
Option 1
22 Hillcrest Avenue S unset Drive and Davison
Drive
45 MPH 40 MPH Decrease Speed
Limit
– 85th percentile,
Option 1
23 Hillcrest Avenue Davison Drive and Lone
Tree Way
45 MPH 40 MPH Decrease Speed
Limit
– 85th percentile,
Option 1

2022 E&TS SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP Page | 19
Table 4: Roadway Segments with Recommended
Changes to Speed Limit
(Continued)

No. Street Between
Existing
Speed
Limit
(mph)
Recommended
Speed Limit
(mph)
Comments
24 James Donlon
Boulevard
Somersville Road and
Contra Loma Boulevard
40 MPH 45 MPH Increase Speed Limit
– 85th percentile,
Option 1
27 Lone Tree Way Putnam Street and James
Donlon Boulevard
35 MPH 40 MPH Increase Speed Limit
– 85th percentile,
Option 1

APPENDIX A
Regulations Governing Speed Limits
(Excerpts from the California Vehicle Code)
(Updated January 2022)
A-1 Appendix A

REGULATIONS GOVERNING SPEED LIMITS

Under California law, the maximum speed limit for any passenger vehicl e is 65 miles per hour (mph). All other speed limits are ca lled prima facie limits which “on the face of it”, are safe and prudent under normal conditions. Certain prima facie limits are established by law and include the 25 mph limit in business and residential districts; the 15 mph limit in alleys, at blind intersections and blind railroad grade crossings; and a part-time 25 mph limit in school zones when children are going to and from school.

Intermediate speed limits between 25 and 65 m ph may be established by local authorities based on engineering and traffic surveys. Such survey s include the analysis of roadway conditions, collision records, and the prevailing speed of prudent drivers using th e highway under study. If speed limits are established below what the majority of drivers consider reasonable, they are often not obeyed and consequently, are difficult to enforce. Those driv ers who do not comply with posted reasonable speed limits are, conversely, subject to equitable enforcement action.

The California Vehicle Code provides that the use of radar to enforce speed limits, which have not been based on an engineering and traffic survey within the preceding five years, constitutes a “speed trap”. Since speed traps are also prohi bited by the code, lack of the required study effectively prohibits local agencies from using radar enforcement.

APPLICABLE CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE SECTIONS
Provided below are the sections of the California Vehicle Code that are applicable to engineering and traffic surveys. The California Vehicle Code wa s recently modified by Assembly Bill 43 (AB 43), which was signed into law in 2021, with parts of it taking effect on January 1, 2022. The CVC sections noted below have been updated to reflect AB 43, w ith the “effective date” provided. The primary change that could affect the result s of this engineering and traffic survey is the addition of Section 22358.8, which allows a local authority that finds, after completing the engineering and traffic survey, that the speed limit is st ill more than is reasonable and safe, t o, by ordinance, retain the current speed limit or restore the immediately prior speed limit if that speed limit was established with an engineering and traffic survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of roadway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since the completion of the engineering and traffic survey establishing the prior speed limit.

Increase of Local Limits
22357. Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that a speed greater than 25 m iles per hour would faci litate the orderly move ment of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe upon any street other than a state highway otherwise subject to a prima facie limit of 25 miles per hour, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie limit of 25 miles per hours, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60 miles per hour or a maximum speed limit of 65 miles per hour, whicheve r is found most appropria te to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic a nd is reasonable and safe. The d eclared prima facie or maximum speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice th ereof are erected upon the A-2 Appendix A

street and shall not thereafter be revised except upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey.

The provisions of this section shall not apply in respect to any 25-mile-per-hour prima facie limit, which is applicable when passing a school building or the grounds thereof.

Decrease of Local Limits
22358. Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the limit of 65 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of any street other than a state highway where the limit of 65 miles per hour is applicable, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed li mit of 60, 55, 50, 45, 40, 35, 30, 25, 20 or 15 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable a nd safe, which declared prima faci e limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street. (Effective January 1, 2022) Downward Speed Zoning
22358.5. It is the intent of the Legislature that physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning, as the basic rule of Section 22350 is sufficient regulation as to such conditions.

22358.6. The Department of Transportation shall, in the next scheduled revision, revise and thereafter maintain the California Manual on Un iform Traffic Control De vices to require the Department of Transportation or a local authority to round speed lim its to the nearest five miles per hour of the 85th percentile of the free-flowing traffic. Howeve r, in cases in which the speed limit needs to be rounded up to th e nearest five miles per hour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, the Department of Transportation or a local authority may decide to instead round down the speed limit to the lower five m iles per hour increment. A local authority may additionally lower the speed limit as provided in Sections 22358.7 and 22358.8. (Effective with next scheduled revision of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices).

22358.7. (a) If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit that has be en reduced an additional five miles per hour for either of the following reasons (Effective June 30, 2024):
(1) The portion of highway has been designated as a safety corridor. A local authority shall not deem more than one-fifth of their streets as safety corridors. (2) The portion of highway is adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestri ans, especially thos e from vulnerable groups such as children, seniors, persons with disabilities, and the unhoused. (b) (1) As used in this section, “safety corr idor” shall be defined by the Department of Transportation in the next revision of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. In making this determination, the department shall consider highways that have the highest number of serious injuries and fatalities based on collision data that may be derived from, but not limited to, the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System.

A-3 Appendix A

(2) The Department of Transportation shall, in the next revisi on of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices , determine what c onstitutes land or facilities that generate high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians, as used in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a ). In making this determin ation, the department shall consider density, road use type, and bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure present on a section of highway.
(c) A local authority may not lower a speed limi t as authorized by this section until June 30, 2024, or until the Judicial Council has de veloped an online t ool for adjudicating infraction violations statewide as specified in Article 7 (commencing with Section 68645) of Chapter 2 of Title 8 of the Government Code, whichever is sooner. (d) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violati ons of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.

22358.8. (a) If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, retain the current speed limit or restore the immediately prior speed limit if that speed limit was established with an engineering and traffic survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that esta blished the prior speed limit. (Effective January 1, 2021)
(b) This section does not authorize a speed limit to be reduced by any more than five miles per hour from the current speed limit nor below the immediately prior speed limit. (c) A local authority shall issue only warni ng citations for viola tions of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.

22358.9. (a) (1) Notwithstanding any ot her law, a local authority ma y, by ordinance, determine and declare a 25 or 20 miles per hour prima facie speed limit on a highway contiguous to a business activity district when posted with a sign that indicates a speed l imit of 25 or 20 miles per hour. (Effective January 1, 2021)
(2) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply only to highways that meet all of the following conditions:
(A) A maximum of four traffic lanes.
(B) A maximum posted 30 m iles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 25 miles per hour speed limit.
(C) A maximum posted 25 m iles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 20 miles per hour speed limit.
(b) As used in this section, a “business activity district” is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto that includes central or neighborhood downtowns, urban villages, or zoning designations that prioritize commercial land uses at the downtown or A-4 Appendix A

neighborhood scale and meets at least three of the following requirements in paragraphs (1) to (4), inclusive:
(1) No less than 50 percent of the contiguous property fronting the highway consists of retail or dining commercial uses, including outdoor dining, that open directly onto sidewalks adjacent to the highway.
(2) Parking, including parallel, diagonal, or perpendicular spaces located alongside the highway.
(3) Traffic control signals or stop signs regulating traffic flow on the highway, located at intervals of no more than 600 feet.
(4) Marked crosswalks not controlled by a traffic control device. (c) A local authority shall not declare a pr ima facie speed limit under this section on a portion of a highway where the local authority has already lowered the speed limit as permitted under Sections 22358.7 and 22358.8.
(d) A local authority shall i ssue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.

Speed Trap
40802. (a) A “speed trap” is either of the following (Effective January 1, 2022):
(1) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (2) A particular section of a highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects. This paragraph does not apply to a local street, road, school zone, senior zone, or business activity district. (b) (1) For purposes of this section, a local street or road is one that is functionally classified as “local” on the “California Road System Maps,” that are a pproved by the Federal Highway Administration and maintained by the Department of Transportation. It may also be defined as a “local street or road” if it primarily provides access to abutting residential property and meets the following three conditions:
(A) Roadway width of not more than 40 feet.
(B) Not more than one-half of a mile of uninterrupted length. Interruptions shall include official traffic control signals as defined in Section 445. (C) Not more than one traffic lane in each direction.
(2) For purposes of th is section, “school zone” means th at area approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. “School zone” also includes the area A-5 Appendix A

approaching or passing any sc hool grounds that are not sepa rated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children if that highway is posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign.
(3) For purposes of this section, “senior zon e” means that area appr oaching or passing a senior center building or other facility prim arily used by senior citizens, or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “SENIOR” warning sign, pursuant to Section 22352.
(4) For purposes of this secti on, “business activity district ” means a section of highway described in subdivision (b) of Section 22358.9 in which a standard 25 miles per hour or 20 miles per hour speed limit sign has been posted pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of that section.
(c) (1) When all of the following criteria are met, paragraph (2) of this subdivision shall be applicable and subdivision (a) shall not be applicable:
(A) When radar is used, the arresting officer has successfully completed a radar operator course of not less than 24 hour s on the use of police traffi c radar, and the course was approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. (B) When laser or any other el ectronic device is used to measure the speed of moving objects, the arresting officer has successf ully completed the training required in subparagraph (A) and an additi onal training course of not less than two hours approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. (C) (i)The prosecution proved that the arresting officer complied with subparagraphs (A) and (B) and that an engineering and traffic survey has been conducted in accordance with subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2). The prosecution proved that, prior to the officer issuing the notice to appear, the arresting officer established that the radar, laser, or other electronic device conformed to the requirements of subparagraph (D). (ii) The prosecution proved the speed of the accused was unsafe for the conditions present at the time of alle ged violation unless the cita tion was for a violation of Section 22349, 22356, or 22406.
(D) The radar, laser, or other electronic device used to measure the speed of the accused meets or exceeds the minimal operational st andards of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within the three years prior to the date of the alleged violation by an i ndependent certified laser or radar repair and testing or calibration facility.
(2) A “speed trap” is either of the following:
(A) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (B) (i) A particular section of a highway or state highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within one of the following time periods, prior to the date of the al leged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the us e of radar or any othe r electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects:

A-6 Appendix A

(I) Except as specified in subclause (II), seven years. (II) If an engineering and traffic survey was conducte d more than seven years prior to the date of the a lleged violation, and a register ed engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have o ccurred, including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume, 14 years. (ii) This subparagraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone, senior zone, or business activity district.

Speed Trap Evidence.
40803. (a) No evidence as to the speed of a vehicle upon a highway shall be admitted in any court upon the trial of any person in any prosecution under this code upon a charge involving the speed of a vehicle when the eviden ce is based upon or obtained from or by the maintenance or use of a speed trap.
(b) In any prosecution under this code of a char ge involving the speed of a vehicle, where enforcement involves the use of radar or other electronic devices which measure the speed of moving objects, the prosecution shall establish, as part of its prima facie case, that the evidence or testimony presented is not based upon a speed trap as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 40802.
(c) When a traffic and engineering survey is required pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 40802, evidence that a traffic and engineering survey has been conducted within five years of the date of the a lleged violation or evidence th at the offense was committed on a local street or road as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 40802 shall constitute a prima facie case that the evidence or te stimony is not based upon a speed trap as defined in subdivision (b) 40802.

Engineering and Traffic Survey
627. (a) “Engineering and tr affic survey” as used in this Co de, means a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accord ance with methods determin ed by the Department of Transportation for use by the state and local authorities. (b) An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other re quirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of all the following 1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements. 2) Collision records.
3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. (c) When conducting an engineering and traffic survey, local authorities, in addition to the factors set forth in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive, of subdivision (b) may consider all of the following:
(1) Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:

A-7 Appendix A

(A) Upon one side of the highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
(B) Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
(C) The portion of highway is longer than one-quarter of a mile but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph (A) or (B).
(2) Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused. (Effective January 1, 2022.

Business District
235. A “business district: is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto (a) upon one side of which highway, for a distance of 600 feet, 50 percent of more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupi ed by buildings in use for busines s, or (b) upon both sided of which highway, collectively, for a distance of 300 feet, 50 percen t or more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is so occupied. A business district ma y be longer than the distance specified in this section if the above ratio of buildings in use fo r business to the length of the highway exists.

Residence District
515. A “residence district” is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district, (a) upon one side of which highway, w ithin a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous prope rty fronting thereon is occupi ed by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures, or (b) upon both sided of which highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling housed or business structures. A residence district may be longer than one quarter of a mile if the above ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway exists.

Business and Residence District: Determination
240. In determining whether a high way is within a business or re sidence district, the following limitations shall apply and shall qualify the definitions Section 235 and 515:
a) No building shall be counted unless its entr ance faces the highway and the front of the building is within 75 feet of the roadway.
b) Where a highway is physically divided into two or more roadways, only those buildings facing each roadway separately shall be counted for the purpose of determining whether the roadway is within a district.
c) All churches, apartments, hotels, multiple dwelling houses, clubs and public buildings, other than schools, shall be deemed to be business structures.

A-8 Appendix A

d) A highway or portion of a highway shall not be deemed to be within a district regardless of the number of buildings upon the contiguous property if there is no right of access to the highway by vehicles from the contiguous property.

Maximum Speed Limit
22349. Except as provided in Section 22356, no person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than 65 miles per hour.

Basic Speed Law
22350. No person shall drive a vehicl e upon a highway at a speed gr eater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for w eather, visibility, the traffic on, and surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.

Speed Law Violations
22351. (a) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway not in excess of the limits specified in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is lawful unless clearly proved to be in violation of the basic speed law.

(b) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway in excess of the prima facie speed limits in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is prima facie unlawful unless the defendant establishes by competent evidence that the speed in excess of said limits did not constitute a violation of the basic speed law at the time, place and under the conditions then existing.

Prima Facie Speed Limits
22352. The prima facie limits are as follows and the same shall be applicable unless changed as authorized in this code and, if so changed, only when signs have been erected giving notice thereof:
(a) Fifteen miles per hour:
1) When traversing a railway grade crossing, if during the last 100 feet of the approach to the crossing the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the crossing and of any traffic on the railway for a distance of 400 feet in both directions along such railway. This subdivision does not apply in the case of any railway grade crossing where a human flagman is on duty or a clearly visible electrical mechanical railway crossing signal device is installed but does not then indicate the immediate approach of a railway train or car.
2) When traversing any intersection of highw ays if during the last 100 feet of his approach to the intersection the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the intersection and of any traffi c upon all of the highways entering the intersection for a distance of 100 feet along all such highways, except at an intersection protected by stop signs or yield right- of-way signs or controlled by official traffic control signals.
3) On any alley.

A-9 Appendix A

(b) Twenty-five miles per hour:
1) On any highway other than a state highwa y, in any business or residence district unless a different speed is determined by local authority under procedures set forth in this code.
2) When passing a school building or the gr ounds thereof, conti guous to a highway and posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during sc hool hours or during the noon recess period.

Such prima facie limit shall also apply when passing any school grounds which are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign.
3) When passing a senior center or facility primarily used by senior citizens, contiguous to a street othe r than a state highway and posted with a standard “SENIOR” warning sign.

Boundary Line Streets
22359. With respect to boundary line streets and highways where portions thereof are within different jurisdictions, no ordinance adopted under Sections 22357 and 22358 shall be effective as to any such portion until all author ities having jurisdiction of the portions of the street concerned have approved the same. This section shall not apply in the case of boundary line streets consisting of separate roadways within different jurisdictions.

Multiple-Lane Highways
22361. On multiple-lane highways w ith two or more separate ro adways, different prima facie speed limits may be established for different road ways under any of the pr ocedures specified in Sections 22354 to 22359, inclusive.

Speed Trap Prohibition
40801. No peace officer or other person shall use a sp eed trap in arresting, or participating or assisting in the arrest of, any person for any alleged violation of this code nor shall any speed trap be used in securing evidence as to the speed of any vehicle for the purpose of an arrest or prosecution under this code.

APPENDIX B
Speed Zoning Regulations from
Caltrans California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices And Definitions of Terms
(Updated January 2022)
B-1 Appendix B

California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
(Regarding Speed Limits)
(Updated January 2022)

Section 2B.13 Speed Limit Sign (R2-1)
Support:
00 The setting of speed limits can be controversial and requires a rational and defensible determination to maintain public confidence. Speed limits are normally set near the 85th-percentile speed that statistically represents one standard deviation above the average speed and establishes the upper limit of what is considered reasonable and prudent. As with most laws, speed limits need to depend on the voluntary compliance of the greater majority of motorists. Speed limits cannot be set arbitrarily low, as this would create violators of the majority of drivers and would not command the respect of the public.

Standard:
01 Speed zones (other than statutory speed limits) shall only be established on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) study that has been performed in accordance with traffic engineering practices. The engineering study shall include an analysis of the current speed distribution of free-flowing vehicles.
02 The Speed Limit (R2-1) sign (see Figure 2B-3) shall display the limit established by law, ordinance, regulation, or as adopted by the authorized agency based on the engineering study.

The speed limits displayed shall be in multiples of 5 mph. 03 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs, indicating speed limits for which posting is required by law, shall be located at the points of change from one speed limit to another. 04 At the downstream end of the section to which a speed limit applies, a Speed Limit sign showing the next speed limit shall be installed. Additional Speed Limit signs shall be installed beyond major intersections and at other locations where it is necessary to remind road users of the speed limit that is applicable.
05 Speed Limit signs indicating the statutory speed limits shall be installed at entrances to the State and, where appropriate, at jurisdictional boundaries in urban areas.

Support:
06 In general, the maximum speed limits applicable to rural and urban roads are established:

A. Statutorily – a maximum speed limit applicable to a particular class of road, such as freeways or city streets, that is established by State law; or
B. As altered speed zones – based on engineering studies. 07 State statutory limits might restrict the maximum speed limit that can be established on a particular road, notwithstanding what an engineering study might indicate.

Option:
08 If a jurisdiction has a policy of installing Speed Limit signs in accordance with statutory requirements only on the streets that enter a city, neighborhood, or residential area to indicate the speed limit that is applicable to the entire city, neighborhood, or residential area unless otherwise posted, a CITYWIDE (R2-5aP), NEIGHBORHOOD (R2-5bP), or RESIDENTIAL (R2-5cP) plaque may be mounted above the Speed Limit sign and an UNLESS OTHERWISE POSTED (R2-5P) plaque may be mounted below the Speed Limit sign (see
Figure 2B-3).

Guidance:
09 A Reduced Speed Limit Ahead (W3-5 or W3-5a) sign (see Section 2C.38) should be used to inform road users of a reduced speed zone where the speed limit is being reduced by more than 10 B-2 Appendix B

mph, or where engineering judgment indicates the need for advance notice to comply with the posted speed limit ahead.
10 States and local agencies should conduct engineering studies at least once every 5, 7 or 10 years, in compliance with CVC Section 40802 to reevaluate non-statutory speed limits on segments of their roadways that have undergone significant changes since the last review, such as the addition or elimination of parking or driveways, changes in the number of travel lanes, changes in the configuration of bicycle lanes, changes in traffic control signal coordination, or significant changes in traffic volumes.
11 No more than three speed limits should be displayed on any one Speed Limit sign or assembly. 12 When a speed limit within a speed zone is posted, it should be within 5 mph of the 85th- percentile speed of free-flowing traffic.

Standard:
12aWhen a speed limit is to be posted, it shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, except as shown in the two Options below.

Option:

1. The posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed, in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5. See Standard below for documentation requirements.

2. For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used. Refer to CVC Section 21400(f).

Standard:
12b If the speed limit to be posted has had the 5 mph reduction applied, then an E&TS shall document in writing the conditions and justification for the lower speed limit and be approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer. The reasons for the lower speed limit shall be in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5.

Support:
12c The following examples are provided to explain the application of these speed limit criteria:

Example 1. Using Option 1 above and first step is to round down: If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 37 mph, then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 37 mph speed. As indicated by the option, this 35 mph established speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph if the conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are documented in the E&TS and approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer.

Example 2. Using Option 1 above and first step is to round up: If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 33 mph, then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 33 mph speed. As indicated by the option, this 35 mph speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph if the conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are documented in the E&TS and approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer.

Example 3. Using Option 2 above and first step is to round up: If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 33 mph, instead of rounding up to 35mph, the speed limit can be established at 30mph, but no further reductions can be applied (which is allowed in the two examples above).

Standard:
12d Examples 1 and 2 for establishing posted speed limits shall apply to engineering and traffic surveys (E&TS) performed on or after July 1, 2009 in accordance with the Department’s Traffic Operations Policy Directive Number 09-04 dated June 29, 2009.

Option:
12e After January 1, 2012, Example 3 may be used to establish speed limits. Refer to CVC 21400(f).

B-3 Appendix B

Support:
12f Any existing E&TS that was performed before July 1, 2009 in accordance with previous traffic control device standards is not required to comply with the new criteria until it is due for reevaluation per the 5, 7 or 10 year criteria.
13 Speed studies for signalized intersection approaches should be taken outside the influence area of the traffic control signal, which is generally considered to be approximately 1/2 mile, to avoid obtaining skewed results for the 85th-percentile speed.

Support:
14 Advance warning signs and other traffic control devices to attract the motorist’s attention to a signalized intersection are usually more effective than a reduced speed limit zone.

Guidance:
15 An advisory speed plaque (see Section 2C.08) mounted below a warning sign should be used to warn road users of an advisory speed for a roadway condition. A Speed Limit sign should not be used for this situation.

Option:
16 Other factors that may be considered when establishing or reevaluating speed limits are the following:

A. Road characteristics, shoulder condition, grade, alignment, and sight distance; B. The pace;
C. Roadside development and environment;
D. Parking practices and pedestrian activity; and
E. Reported crash experience for at least a 12-month period. 17 Two types of Speed Limit signs may be used: one to designate passenger car speeds, including any nighttime information or minimum speed limit that might apply; and the other to show any special speed limits for trucks and other vehicles.
18 A changeable message sign that changes the speed limit for traffic and ambient conditions may be installed provided that the appropriate speed limit is displayed at the proper times. 19 A changeable message sign that displays to approaching drivers the speed at which they are traveling may be installed in conjunction with a Speed Limit sign.

Guidance:
20 If a changeable message sign displaying approach speeds is installed, the legend YOUR SPEED XX MPH or such similar legend should be displayed. The color of the changeable message legend should be a yellow legend on a black background or the reverse of these colors.

Support:
21 Advisory Speed signs and plaques are discussed in Sections 2C.08 and 2C.14. Temporary Traffic Control Zone Speed signs are discussed in Part 6. The WORK ZONE (G20-5aP) plaque intended for installation above a Speed Limit sign is discussed in Section 6F.12. School Speed Limit signs are discussed in Section 7B.15.
22 Speed limits in California are governed by the California Vehicle Code (CVC), Sections 22348 through 22413; also, pertinent sections are found in Sections 627 and 40802 and others referenced in this section. See Section 1A.11 for information regarding this publication. 23 Refer to Part 6, Section 6C.01 for speed limit signs in temporary traffic control zones. Refer to Part 7 for speed limit signs in school areas.

Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS)
Support:

CVC Section 627 defines the term “Engineering and traffic survey” and lists its requirements.

Standard:

B-4 Appendix B

24 An engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of all of the following:

A. Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements.

B. Collision records.

C. Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver.

Guidance:
25 The E&TS should contain sufficient information to document that the required three items of CVC Section 627 are provided and that other conditions not readily apparent to a driver are properly identified. 26 Prevailing speeds are determined by a speed zone survey. A speed zone survey should include:

A. The intent of the speed measurements is to determine the actual speed of unimpeded traffic. The speed of traffic should not be altered by concentrated law enforcement, or other means, just prior to, or while taking the speed measurements.

B. Only one person is required for the field work. Speeds should be read directly from a radar or other electronic speed measuring devices; or,
C. Devices, other than radar, capable of accurately distinguishing and measuring the unimpeded speed of free flowing vehicles may be used.

D. A location should be selected where prevailing speeds are representative of the entire speed zone section.

If speeds vary on a given route, more than one speed zone section may be required, with separate measurements for each section. Locations for measurements should be chosen so as to minimize the effects of traffic signals or stop signs.

E. Speed measurements should be taken during off-peak hours between peak traffic periods on weekdays. If there is difficulty in obtaining the desired quantity, speed measurements may be taken during any period with free flowing traffic.

F. The weather should be fair (dry pavement) with no unusual conditions prevailing.

G. The surveyor and equipment should not affect the traffic speeds. For this reason, an unmarked car is recommended, and the radar speed meter located as inconspicuously as possible.

H. In order for the sample to be representative of the actual traffic flow, the minimum sample should be 100 vehicles in each survey. In no case should the sample contain less than 50 vehicles.

I. Short speed zones of less than 0.5 mile should be avoided, except in transition areas.

J. Speed zone changes should be coordinated with changes in roadway conditions or roadside development.

K. Speed zoning should be in 10 mph increments except in urban areas where 5 mph increments are preferable.

L. Speed zoning should be coordinated with adjacent jurisdictions.

Support:
27 Physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to the driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning. Refer to CVC 22358.5.

Option:
28 When qualifying an appropriate speed limit, local authorities may also consider all of the following findings:

A. Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:

1. Upon one side of the highway, within 0.25 mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.

2. Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of 0.25 mile the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.

B-5 Appendix B

3. The portion of highway is larger than 0.25 mile but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph a or b.

B. Pedestrian and bicyclist safety.
29 The following two methods of conducting E&TS may be used to establish speed limits:

1. State Highways - The E&TS for State highways is made under the direction of the Department of Transportation’s District Traffic Engineer. The data includes:
a. One copy of the Example of Speed Zone Survey Sheet (See Figure 2B-101(CA)) showing:
• A north arrow
• Engineer's station or post mileage
• Limits of the proposed zones
• Appropriate notations showing type of roadside development, such as “scattered business,” “solid residential,” etc. Schools adjacent to the highway are shown, but other buildings need not be plotted unless they are a factor in the speed recommendation or the point of termination of a speed zone.
• Collision rates for the zones involved
• Average daily traffic volume
• Location of traffic signals, signs and markings
• If the highway is divided, the limits of zones for each direction of travel • Plotted 85th percentile and pace speeds at location taken showing speed profile b. A report to the District Director that includes:
• The reason for the initiation of speed zone survey.
• Recommendations and supporting reasons.
• The enforcement jurisdictions involved and the recommendations and opinions of those officials. • The stationing or reference post in mileage at the beginning and ending of each proposed zone and any intermediate equations. Location ties must be given to readily identifiable physical features.

2. City and County Through Highways, Arterials, Collector Roads and Local Streets. a. The short method of speed zoning is based on the premise that a reasonable speed limit is one that conforms to the actual behavior of the majority of motorists, and that by measuring motorists' speeds, one will be able to select a speed limit that is both reasonable and effective. Other factors that need to be considered include but are not limited to: the most recent two-year collision record, roadway design speed, safe stopping sight distance, superelevation, shoulder conditions, profile conditions, intersection spacing and offsets, commercial driveway characteristics, and pedestrian traffic in the roadway without sidewalks.
b. Determination of Existing Speed Limits - Figures 2B-103(CA) & 2B-104(CA) show examples of data sheets which may be used to record speed observations. Specific types of vehicles may be tallied by use of letter symbols in appropriate squares.
30 In most situations, the short form for local streets and roads will be adequate; however, the procedure used on State highways may be used at the option of the local agency.

Guidance:
31 The factors justifying a reduction below the 85th percentile speed for the posted speed limit are the same factors mentioned above. Whenever such factors are considered to establish the speed limit, they should be documented on the speed zone survey or the accompanying engineering report. 32 The establishment of a speed limit of more than 5 mph below the 85th percentile speed should be done with great care as studies have shown that establishing a speed limit at less than the 85th percentile generally results in an increase in collision rates; in addition, this may make violators of a disproportionate number of the reasonable majority of drivers.

B-6 Appendix B

Support:
33 Generally, the most decisive evidence of conditions not readily apparent to the driver surface in collision histories.
34 Speed limits are established at or near the 85th percentile speed, which is defined as that speed at or below which 85th percent of the traffic is moving. The 85th percentile speed is often referred to as the critical speed.

Pace speed is defined as the 10 mph increment of speed containing the largest number of vehicles (See Figure 2B-102(CA)). The lower limit of the pace is plotted on the Speed Zone Survey Sheets as an aid in determining the proper zone limits. Speed limits higher than the 85th percentile are not generally considered reasonable and prudent. Speed limits below the 85th percentile do not ordinarily facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and require constant enforcement to maintain compliance. Speed limits established on the basis of the 85th percentile conform to the consensus of those who drive highways as to what speed is reasonable and prudent, and are not dependent on the judgment of one or a few individuals. 35 The majority of drivers comply with the basic speed law. Speed limits set at or near the 85th percentile speed provide law enforcement officers with a limit to cite drivers who will not conform to what the majority considers reasonable and prudent.

Further studies show that establishing a speed limit at less than the 85th percentile (Critical Speed) generally results in an increase in collision rates.

Option:
36 When roadside development results in traffic conflicts and unusual conditions which are not readily apparent to drivers, as indicated in collision records, speed limits somewhat below the 85th percentile may be justified. Concurrence and support of enforcement officials are necessary for the successful operation of a restricted speed zone.

Guidance:
37 Speed zones of less than 0.5 mile and short transition zones should be avoided.

Signs
Standard:
38 The Speed Limit (R2-1) sign shall be used to give notice of a prima facie or maximum speed limit except as provided under Prima Facie Speed Limits in CVC 22352. 39 When used, the TRUCKS, 3 AXLES OR MORE 55 MAXIMUM (R6-3(CA)) sign shall be installed approximately 750 feet following each R2-1 sign.
40 The ALL VEHICLES WHEN TOWING 55 MAXIMUM (R6-4(CA)) sign shall be installed approximately 750 feet following the R6-3(CA) sign.

Guidance:
41 The R6-3(CA) and R6-4(CA) signs should be placed on highway segments where speeds in excess of 55 mph are permitted.

Option:
42 The existing AUTOS WITH TRAILERS, TRUCKS 55 MAXIMUM (R6-1(CA)) sign may remain in place until it is knocked down, damaged, stolen, vandalized, or otherwise reaches the end of its useful life. 43 The local California Highway Patrol office may be consulted to identify highway segments where enforcement is an issue.

On these segments early replacement of existing R6-1(CA) signs may be necessary.

Support:
44 Refer to CVC Section 22406 for types of vehicles subject to the 55 mph maximum speed limit.

Option:
45 The Speed Zone Ahead (R2-4(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used to inform the motorist of a reduced speed zone.

B-7 Appendix B
Standard:

46 The R2-4(CA) sign shall always be followed by a Speed Limit (R2-1) sign installed at the beginning of the zone where the reduced speed limit applies.
47 The End Speed Limit (R3(CA)) sign shall only be used to mark the end of a speed zone. 48 The R3(CA) sign shall not be used at a transition into a change in speed limits within a reduced zone.

Option:
49 The R3(CA) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used with the TRUCK (M4-4) plaque to mark the end of truck speed zones on descending grades.

Standard:
50 Speed limit signs shall be placed at the beginning of all restricted speed zones.

Option:
51 Where speed zones are longer than 1 mile, intermediate signs may be placed at approximate 1 mile intervals. For three or more lanes in each direction, dual installation may be used.

Standard:
52 The Speed Limit (R2-1) and End Speed Limit (R3(CA)) signs, as appropriate shall be placed at the end of all restricted speed zones.
53 Freeways with 65 mph and those segments where a speed limit of 70 mph has been approved by the Department of Transportation, with approval by the California Highway Patrol, shall be posted as follows:
• At the segment entrance, R2-1 signs shall be installed right of traffic off of the right shoulder. • R2-1 signs shall also be installed off of the right shoulder only, throughout the segment, at a maximum of 25 mile intervals.

Option:
• The 25 mile interval may be modified to include locations following entrance ramps.

Standard:
• The R6-3(CA) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) shall be installed approximately 750 feet following each R2-1 sign, both at the beginning and throughout each 60, 65 or 70 mph segment. • The R6-4(CA) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) shall be installed approximately 750 feet following each R6-3(CA) sign.

Option:
• The SLOWER TRAFFIC KEEP RIGHT (R4-3) signs may be installed at locations where there is a tendency of the motorists to drive in the left-hand lane(s) below the normal speed of traffic.

Standard:
• Signs shall be placed in protected locations.
• At the end of the 70/65 mph segment, R2-1 signs shall be installed off of the right shoulder. 54 Freeway segments where a 55 mph speed limit has been approved by the Department of Transportation, with the approval of the California Highway Patrol, shall be posted as follows:
• The beginning of the segment shall be posted with an R2-1 sign installed on the right shoulder and left shoulder where the median is of sufficient width to permit sign maintenance without lane closures.

Guidance:
• Subsequent signs should then be posted on the right shoulder, on approximate 3 mile intervals, with no more than 3 interchanges between signs.
• At the end of the segment, an R2-1 sign with the appropriate number for the next speed limit should be posted on the right shoulder.
55 Conventional highways with 55 mph speed limits should be posted as follows:

B-8 Appendix B
Standard:

• The beginning of the segment shall be posted with an R2-1 sign installed on the right shoulder.

Guidance:
• Subsequent signs should then be posted on approximate 5 to 10 mile intervals and immediately after locations where significant volumes of traffic enter the segment. • At the end of the segment, an R2-1 sign with the appropriate number for the next speed limit should be posted on the right shoulder.

Conventional highways with 65 mph speed limits should be posted as follows:
• The beginning of the segment should be posted with an R2-1 sign installed on the right shoulder. • Subsequent signs should then be posted at 5 to 10 mile intervals and after locations where significant volumes of traffic enter the segment.
• At the end of the segment, an R2-1 sign with the appropriate number for the next speed limit should be posted on the right shoulder.

Option:
56 Pavement markings with appropriate numerals (see Section 3B.21) may be used to supplement speed limit signs.

Standard:
57 The R2-1 and R6-3(CA) and R6-4(CA) signs gi ving maximum statewide speed limits for various types of vehicles shall be installed on all State highways near the points of entrance into California.

Guidance:
58 The R2-1 and R6-3(CA) and R6-4(CA) signs should be placed in a location to be most effectively viewed by the approaching motorists.

Standard:
59 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of freeway with posted speed limits of 65 mph or 70 mph at a maximum of 25 mile intervals.

Option:
60 The 25 mile interval may be modified to include locations following entrance ramps.

Standard:
61 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of conventional highways with a posted speed limit of 65 mph at 5 mile to 10 mile intervals. 62 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of freeway with a posted speed limit of 55 mph at approximately 3 mile intervals with no more than 3 interchanges between signs. 63 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of conventional highways with a posted speed limit of 55 mph at 5 mile to 10 mile intervals.

Speed Enforced Signs
Option:
64 The SPEED ENFORCED BY RADAR (R48(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used where the California Highway Patrol has received authority to use radar and requests such signs.

Guidance:
65 One sign should be used in each direction at the beginning of the segment of roadway, and at intervening major route intersections, where radar enforcement is in effect.

Support:
66 The R48(CA) sign is a stand-alone sign intended to alert motorists that speed is enforced by radar on a particular segment of roadway.

Option:
67 The RADAR ENFORCED (R48-1(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used in combination with the Speed Limit (R2-1) sign on any roadway where law enforcement has the authority to use radar.

B-9 Appendix B

Guidance:
68 When used, the R48-1(CA) sign should be placed below the R2-1 sign, at the beginning of the segment of roadway and at intervening major intersections, where radar enforcement is in effect.

Option:
69 The SPEED ENFORCED BY AIRCRAFT (R48-2(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be placed, when requested by the California Highway Patrol, on sections of highway regularly patrolled by aircraft.

Standard:
70 The R48-2(CA) sign shall be used for both directions of travel.

Guidance:
71 The R48-2(CA) sign should be placed at the beginning of the section and spaced at 25 mile intervals. See Figure 3B-105(CA).

Vehicle Speed Feedback Signs
Option:
72 A Vehicle Speed Feedback sign that displays to approaching drivers the speed at which they are traveling may be installed in conjunction with a Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.

Standard:
73 If a Vehicle Speed Feedback sign displaying approach speeds is installed, the legend shall be YOUR SPEED XX. The numerals displaying the speed shall be white, yellow, yellow-green or amber color on black background. When activated, lights shall be steady-burn conforming to the provisions of CVC Sections 21466 and 21466.5. Vehicle Speed Feedback signs shall not alternatively be operated as variable speed limit signs.

Guidance:
74 To the degree practical, numerals for displaying approach speeds should be similar font and size as numerals on the corresponding Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.

Option:
75 When used, the Vehicle Speed Feedback sign may be mounted on either a separate support or on the same support as the Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.
76 In lieu of lights, legend may be retroreflective film for flip-disk systems. 77 The legend YOUR SPEED may be white on black plaque located above the changeable speed display.

Support:
78 Driver comprehension may improve when the Vehicle Speed Feedback Sign is mounted on the same support below the Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.
79 Vehicle Speed Feedback Signs are appropriate for use with advisory speed signs and with temporary signs in temporary traffic control zones.

Basic Speed Law and Prima Facie Speed Limits – See CVC 22350 & 22352 Support:
80 The basic speed law states “No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.” Standard:
81 Prima facie speed limits are specific limits and shall apply unless changed based upon an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) and signs are posted that display the new speed limit.

Option:
82 Prima facie speed limits may be preempted by the basic speed law, when roadway, traffic or weather conditions warrant a lower speed.

B-10 Appendix B

Use of Metric System Designations – See CVC 21351.3
Option:
83 Dual units for speed limits on signs may be placed on local streets and roads in both Metric and English units.

Guidance:
84 If used, dual unit speed limits should be rounded to the nearest 10 km/h for Metric and 5 mph for English units for posting on signs on local streets and roads.

Support:
85 Refer to AASHTO’s Traffic Engineering Metric Conversion Factors. See Section 1A.11 for information regarding this publication.

Standard:
86 Metric speed limits shall not be placed on State highways. For use in this California MUTCD, 70 mph shall be shown as a metric equivalent of 110 km/h, neither of which shall be used on any local street or road.

Legal Authority for Establishing Speed Limits
Support:
87 Delegation of legal authority to set speed limits on State highways is given to Department of Transportation’s District Directors. The District Director of each transportation district is authorized to issue orders regulating the speed of traffic, up to 65 mph on State highways. The Director of the Department of Transportation retains the authority to approve variable, minimum, and maximum speeds up to 70 mph on State freeways.

Standard:
88 The speed limits shown in Table 2B-101(CA) shall apply, unless changed upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS).

Option:
89 The speed limits shown in Table 2B-102(CA) may apply, unless changed upon E&TS.

Variable Speed Limits on Freeways - See CVC 22355
Option:
90 The following speed limits may apply:
• Whenever the Department of Transportation determines based upon an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) that the safe and orderly movement of traffic upon any freeway segment will be facilitated by the establishment of variable speed limits.
• The Department may erect, regulate, and control signs upon the state highway which is a freeway, or any portion thereof, which, if used, signs shall be designed to permit display of different speeds at various times of the day or night.
• Such signs need not conform to the standards & specifications per CVC 21400, but if used, shall be of sufficient size and clarity to give adequate notice of the applicable speed limit.

Minimum Speed Limits on State Highways - See CVC 22400
Option:
91 The following speed limits may apply:
• Whenever the Department of Transportation determines based upon an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) that slow speeds on any part of a state highway consistently impede the normal and reasonable movement of traffic, the Department may determine and declare a minimum speed limit. Appropriate signs giving notice shall then be installed on that segment.
• A motorist can be cited for stopping or impeding the normal and reasonable movement of traffic unless the stop is necessary for safe operation and in compliance with the law.

B-11 Appendix B

Speed Traps
Support:
92 Refer to CVC 40802 for Speed Traps.

Standard:
93 A speed trap shall not apply to a local street, road, or school zone. 94 A section of highway shall be defined as a speed trap if the prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) within five years, and the enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects. 95 This time provision shall be extended to seven years when using radar and all of the following criteria are met:
• The arresting officer has successfully completed a minimum of 24 hours of certified radar operator course training.
• The radar used to measure the speed meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within three years of the alleged violation.
96 This time provision shall be extended to seven years when using laser or other electronic device (other than radar) and all of the following criteria are met:
• The arresting officer has successfully completed a minimum of 24 hours of certified radar operator course training.
• The arresting officer has successfully completed a minimum of 2 hours of additional approved certified training.
• The radar used to measure the speed meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within three years of the alleged violation.

Option:
97 This time provision for an E&TS may be extended to ten years when all of the above conditions are met and no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume as determined by a registered engineer.

Truck Speed Zone on Descending Grades
Guidance:
98 Highway descending grades, if used for posting TRUCK Speed Limit signs (R2-1 and M4-4) for trucks travelling downhill, should have recorded incident history of runaway commercial vehicles. Descending grades shorter than 1 mile should be avoided for posting signs because deceleration of vehicles due to braking action can generally provide sufficient control on descending grades of less than 1 mile.

Support:
99 To establish a downhill truck speed limit, a physical profile showing length and gradient and a downhill speed profile for three or more axle commercial vehicles with a gross rating of 10,000 lbs. or more will be provided.

Standard:
100 Speed profiles for truck speed limits shall be prepared on the same form as other speed surveys.

An analysis of collisions involving trucks shall be prepared.

Guidance:
101 Posted speeds should be on the low side of the scale, generally within the pace of loaded commercial vehicles.

Standard:
102 If warranted, the Department of Transportation’s District Director shall issue a standard speed zone order.

B-12 Appendix B

Support:
103 Posting of the regulation will be by placement of a standard 36 x 45 inch Speed Limit (R2-1) sign with a TRUCK (M4-4) plate above.

Standard:
104 A standard End Speed Limit (R3(CA)) sign with TRUCK (M4-4) plate shall be posted at the end of the truck zone when appropriate.

Speed Zones in Temporary Traffic Control Areas
Support:
105 For signing and establishing speed zones in temporary traffic control areas, refer to Section 6C.01 in Part

6. Speed Zones and Traffic Signals
Standard:
106 An agency changing the speed limits within its jurisdiction shall report the speed limit change to the agency operating and maintaining traffic signals within the speed zone no later than 30 days before changing the posted speed limit.

Support:
107 Changing the signal timing and adjusting the advance detector loops based on the revised speed limits can enhance the operations of the traffic signal.

B-13 Appendix B

Definitions of Selected Terms Used in the CA MUTCD

Text Headings

Standard—a statement of required, m andatory, or specific ally prohibitive practice regarding a traffic control device. All Standard statements are labeled, and the text appears in bold type. The verb “shall” is typically used. The verbs “should” and “may” are not used in Standard statements.

Standard statements are sometimes modified by Options.

Guidance—a statement of recommended, but not mandatory, practice in typical situations, with deviations allowed if engineerin g judgment or engineering study indicates the deviation to be appropriate. All Guidance statements are la beled, and the text appears in non-bolded type. The verb “should” is typically used. The verbs “shall” and “may” are not used in Guidance statements.

Guidance statements are sometimes modified by Options.

Option—a statement of practice t hat is a permissive condition and carries no requirement or recommendation. Option statements sometime contain allowable modifications to a Standard or Guidance statement. All Option statements are labeled, and the text appears in non-bolded type.

The verb “may” is typically used. The verbs “shall” and “should” are not used in Option statements.

Support—an informational statement that does not convey any degree of mandate, recommendation, authorization, pr ohibition, or enforceable condit ion. Support statements are labeled, and the text appears in non-bolded type. The verbs “shall,” “should,” and “may” are not used in Support statements.

Words and Phrases

Speed—speed is defined based on the following classifications:
(a) Average Speed —the summation of t he instantaneous or spot-m easured speeds at a specific location of vehicles divided by the number of vehicles observed. (b) Design Speed—a selected speed used to determine the various geometric design features of a roadway.
(c) 85th-Percentile Speed—the speed at or below which 85 percent of the motor vehicles travel.
(d) Operating Speed —a speed at which a typical vehicl e or the overall traffic operates.

Operating speed might be defined with speed values such as the average, pace, or 85th- percentile speeds.
(e) Pace—the 10 mph speed range repr esenting the speeds of th e largest percentage of vehicles in the traffic stream.

B-14 Appendix B

Speed Limit —the maximum (or minimum) speed applic able to a section of highway as established by law or regulation.

Posted Speed Limit—a speed limit determined by law or regulation and displayed on Speed Limit signs.

Speed Zone—a section of highwa y with a speed limit that is established by law or regulation, but which might be different from a legislatively specified statutory speed limit.

Statutory Speed Limit—a speed limit established by legislative action that typically is applicable for a particular class of highways with spec ified design, functional, jurisdictional and/or location characteristics and that is not necessarily displayed on Speed Limit signs.

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) —the average 24 hour volume, being the total volume during a stated period divided by the number of days in that period. Normally, this would be periodic daily traffic volumes over several days, not adjusted for days of the week or seasons of the year.

Bicycle Lane—a portion of a roadway that has been desi gnated for preferential or exclusive use by bicyclists by pavement markings and, if used, signs. See Class II Bikeway.

Business District - A "business district" is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto (a) upon one side of which highway, for a distance of 600 feet, 50 percent or more of the contiguous property fronti ng thereon is occupied by buildings in use for business, or (b) upon both sides of which highway, collectively, for a distance of 300 feet, 50 per cent or more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is so occupied. A business district may be longer than the distances specified in this section if the above ratio of buildings in use for business to the length of the highway exists. Refer to CVC 235.

CVC – California Vehicle Code.

Class II Bikeway (such as a Bike Lane) – Provides a restricted right-of-way designated for the exclusive or semi-exclusive use of bicycles with through travel by motor vehicles or pedestrians prohibited, but with vehicle parking and crossflows by pedestrians and motorists permitted. Refer to California Streets and Highways Code Section 890.4. Refe r to Caltrans’ Highway Design Manual Index 1003.2 for design criteria.

Divided Highway – A highway with separated roadbeds for traffic in opposing directions.

Engineer – a person registered under Cali fornia Professional Engineers Act as a professional engineer, including any of the branches thereof. Refer to Calif ornia Business and Professions Code Section 6706. 63b. Engineering and Traffic Survey – Refer to CVC 627.

Engineering Judgment—the evaluation of availa ble pertinent information, and the application of appropriate principles, experience, education, discretion, provisions, and practices as contained in this Manual and other sources, for the pur pose of deciding upon the applicability, design, operation, or installation of a traffic control device. Engineering judgment shall be B-15 Appendix B

exercised by an engineer, or by an individual wo rking under the supervi sion of an engineer, through the application of procedures and criteria established by the engineer. Documentation of engineering judgment is not required.

Engineering Study —the comprehensive analysis and evaluation of available pertinent information, and the application of appropriate principles, engin eering judgment, experience, education, discretion, provisions, and practices as contained in th is Manual and other sources, for the purpose of deciding upon t he applicability, design, operation, or installation of a traffic control device. An engineering study shall be performed by an e ngineer, or by an individual working under the supervision of an engineer, through the application of procedures and criteria established by the engineer. An engineering study shall be documented.

Median—the area between two roadways of a divided highway measured from edge of traveled way to edge of traveled way. The median excl udes turn lanes. The median width might be different between intersections, interchanges , and at opposite approaches of the same intersection.

Multi-Lane—more than one lane moving in the same dire ction. A multi-lane street, highway, or roadway has a basic cross-section comprised of two or more through lanes in one or both directions. A multi-lane approach has two or more lanes moving toward the intersection, including turning lanes.

Pedestrian—a person on foot, in a wheelchair, on skate s, or on a skateboard. As per CVC 467, (a) A "pedestrian" is a person who is afoot or who is using any of the following: (1) A means of conveyance propelled by human power other than a bicycle. (2) An electr ic personal assistive mobility device. (b) "Pedestrian" includes a person who is operating a self-propelled wheelchair, motorized tricycle, or motorized quadricycle and, by reason of physical disability, is otherwise unable to move about as a pedestrian, as specified in subdivision(a).

Pedestrian Facilities —a general term denoting improvements and provisions made to accommodate or encourage walking.

Roadway—that portion of a highway im proved, designed, or ordinarily used for vehicular travel and parking lanes, but exclusive of the sidewalk, berm, or shoulder even though such sidewalk, berm, or shoulder is used by persons riding bi cycles or other human-powered vehicles. In the event a highway includes two or more separate roadways, the term roadway as used in this Manual shall refer to any such roadway separately, but not to all such roadways collectively. Refer to CVC 527.

Shared-Use Path (Class I Bikeway) —a bikeway outside the traveled way and physically separated from motorized vehicular traffic by an open space or barrier and either within the highway right-of-way or within an independent alignment. Shared- use paths are also used by pedestrians (including skaters, users of manual and motorized wheelcha irs, and joggers) and other authorized motorized and non-motorized user s. Refer to the Caltrans’ Highway Design Manual Index 1003.1 for design criteria.

B-16 Appendix B

Shoulder – The portion of the highwa y contiguous with the roadway for accommodations of pedestrians, bicyclists, stopped vehicles, for emergency use, and for lateral support of base and surface courses.

Sidewalk—that portion of a str eet between the curb line, or the lateral line of a roadway, and the adjacent property line or on easements of private property that is paved or improved and intended for use by pedestrians. As per CVC 555, "Sidewalk" is that portion of a highway, other than the roadway, set apart by curbs, barriers, markings or other delineation for pedestrian travel.

Traffic Control Device—a sign, signal, marking, or other dev ice used to regulate, warn, or guide traffic, placed on, over, or adjacent to a stree t, highway, private road open to public travel (see definition of private road open to public travel), pedestrian facility, or shared-use path by authority of a public agency or official having jurisdiction, or , in the case of a private road open to public travel (see definition of private road open to public tr avel), by authority of the private owner or private official having jurisdiction.

APPENDIX C
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary Sheets

Location: W. 2nd Street Survey Date: April 8, 2021
Between: L Street & G Street Segment No: 1
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Antioch
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,468
1,690

0.32 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
31 mph
22-31 mph
25 mph
Recommendation
January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2020
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes, sidewalk on both sides of road. Prospects High School.

Roadway Geometrics:
2-lane undivided.

Comments:

On-street parking, trucks present, and ped/bike safety
Downtown Commercial / Residential / Public Institution
25 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 30 mph, then reduced another 5 mph, to 25 mph, due to on-street parking, trucks present, and ped/bike safety)
4/14/22
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date CERTIFICATION: I, Ruth Smith, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Antioch was performed under my supervision, conforms to Sections 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic)*:

C-1
Appendix C
Location: W. 4th Street Survey Date: April 8, 2021
Between: L Street & C Street Segment No: 2
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Antioch
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
1,599
3,170

0.60 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
29 mph
19-28 mph
25 mph
Recommendation
January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2020
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes, sidewalk on both sides of the road.

Roadway Geometrics:
2-lane undivided
Comments:

On-street parking, high driveway density, residential density, and ped/bike safety Residential / Commercial
25 mph
No
4/14/22
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date 85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 30 mph, then reduced by 5 mph to 25 mph) CERTIFICATION: I, Ruth Smith, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Antioch was performed under my supervision, conforms to Sections 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic)*:

C-2
Appendix C
Location: W. 6th Street Survey Date: April 7, 2021
Between: L Street & A Street Segment No: 3
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Antioch
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
1,453
3,910

0.74 Single Lane Each Direction
Local
Speed Survey Data
32 mph
23-32 mph
25 mph
Recommendation
January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2020
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes, sidewalk on both sides of road. Near Antioch Unified School District.

Roadway Geometrics:
2-lane undivided roadway. Vertical curve between I Street and H Street, with visibility impacted for EB direction.

Comments:
on-street parking, not obvious vertical curve, residential density, and ped/bike safety Residential / Institutional
25 mph
No
4/14/22
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date 85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 30 mph, then reduced another 5 mph, to 25 mph, due to on-street parking, not obvious vertical curve, residential density, and ped/bike safety)
CERTIFICATION: I, Ruth Smith, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Antioch was performed under my supervision, conforms to Sections 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic)*:

C-3
Appendix C
Location: W. 10th Street Survey Date: April 7, 2021
Between: Auto Center Drive & L Street Segment No: 4
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.91
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Antioch
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
11,680
2,855

0.54 Divided Roadway: Two Lanes Each Direction with Median Arterial
Speed Survey Data
EB: 42 mph / WB: 41 mph. Recommended speed limit based on greater 85th percentile speed of 42 mph.

EB: 33-42 mph / WB: 33-42
35 mph
Recommendation
January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2020
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes, sidewalk on both sides of road. School crossing at O Street near Antioch High School.

Roadway Geometrics:
4-lane, divided (raised median)
Comments:
on-street parking, high driveway density, trucks present, residential density, and ped/bike safety Commercial / Residential
35 mph
No
4/14/22
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date 85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded 42 mph down to 40 mph, then reduced another 5 mph, to 35 mph, due to on-street parking, high driveway density, trucks present, residential density, and ped/bike safety) CERTIFICATION: I, Ruth Smith, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Antioch was performed under my supervision, conforms to Sections 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic)*:

C-4
Appendix C
Location: E. 18th Street Survey Date: April 7, 2021
Between: A Street & Hillcrest Avenue Segment No: 5
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Antioch
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
12,539
2,640

0.50 Two Lanes Each Direction
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
42 mph
33-42 mph
30 mph
Recommendation
January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2020
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes, sidewalk on both sides of the road. Near Rocketship Delta Prep Elementary School at Cavallo Road.

Roadway Geometrics:
4-lane undivided, with two-way left turn lane
Comments:
high driveway density and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial
35 mph
Yes, 5 mph increase
4/14/22
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date 85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 40 mph, then reduced another 5 mph, to 35 mph, due to high driveway density and ped/bike safety)
CERTIFICATION: I, Ruth Smith, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Antioch was performed under my supervision, conforms to Sections 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic)*:

C-5
Appendix C
Location: E. 18th Street Survey Date: April 7, 2021
Between: Hillcrest Avenue & East City Limits Segment No: 6 Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Antioch
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
9,462
10,190

1.93 Two Lanes Each Direction
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
50 mph
40-49 mph
45 mph
Recommendation
January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2020
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Portion with 3 lanes and Median 2EB/1WB. No bike lanes, sidewalk on both sides of the road.

Roadway Geometrics:
4-lane divided (raised median) and 4-lane undivided, with two-way left turn lane Comments:

Residential density and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial / Agricultural / Open Space
45 mph
No
4/14/22
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date 85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded to 50 mph, then reduced by 5 mph, to 45 mph, due to residential density and ped/bike safety) CERTIFICATION: I, Ruth Smith, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Antioch was performed under my supervision, conforms to Sections 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic)*:

C-6
Appendix C
Location: Auto Center Drive Survey Date: April 6, 2021
Between: 4th Street & 10th Street Segment No: 7
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group 35 mph
No
4/14/22
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date 85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded 42 mph down to 40 mph, then reduced another 5 mph, to 35 mph, due to ped/bike safety) CERTIFICATION: I, Ruth Smith, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Antioch was performed under my supervision, conforms to Sections 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic)*:

Recommendation
January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2020
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes, sidewalk on both sides of the road. Portion of segment is Somersville Rd and turns into Auto Center Drive.

0.91 Roadway Geometrics:
4-lane divided (raised median)
Comments:
ped/bike safety
Commercial
Collision History
City of Antioch
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
3,752
2,325

0.44 Divided Roadway: Two Lanes Each Direction with Median Arterial
Speed Survey Data
NB: 42 mph / SB: 42 mph. Recommended speed limit based on greater 85th percentile speed of 42 mph.

NB: 33-42 mph / SB: 32-41 mph
35 mph
C-7
Appendix C
Location: Auto Center Drive Survey Date: April 9, 2021
Between: SPRR & SR-4 Segment No: 8
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.91
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group 35 mph
No
4/14/22
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date 85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded 42 mph down to 40 mph, then reduced by 5 mph, to 35 mph, due to trucks present and ped/bike safety) CERTIFICATION: I, Ruth Smith, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Antioch was performed under my supervision, conforms to Sections 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic)*:

Recommendation
January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2020
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes, sidewalk on both sides of the road.

Roadway Geometrics:
5-lane divided (raised median), 6-lane divided (raised median) Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Commercial
Collision History
City of Antioch
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
20,864
1,745

0.33 Divided Roadway: Two Lanes Each Direction with Median Arterial
Speed Survey Data
NB: 42 mph / SB: 39 mph. Recommended speed limit based on greater 85th percentile speed of 42 mph.

NB: 30-39 mph / SB: 29-38 mph
35 mph
C-8
Appendix C
Location: Buchanan Road Survey Date: April 6, 2021
Between: City Limits & Somersville Road Segment No: 9
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.62
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group 45 mph
No
4/14/22
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date 85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 50 mph, then reduced by 5 mph, to 45 mph) CERTIFICATION: I, Ruth Smith, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Antioch was performed under my supervision, conforms to Sections 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic)*:

Recommendation
January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2020
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Portion with 2EB/1WB lane, most of the segment is 1EB/1WB. Very narrow WB bike lanes west of Buchanan Crossing. There is a lot of random objects in WB lane (dumping) during site visit. Only partial sidewalk throughout segment.

Roadway Geometrics:
2-lane undivided, 2-lane divided (painted median), 3-lane divided (painted median) Comments:
trucks present, not obvious dumping issue and ped/bike safety High Density Residential / Commercial / Open Space
Collision History
City of Antioch
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
16,899
3,380

0.64 Single Lane Each Direction
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
49 mph
41-50 mph
45 mph
C-9
Appendix C
Location: Buchanan Road Survey Date: April 6, 2021
Between: Somersville Road & Lucena Way Segment No: 10
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.91
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group 35 mph
No
4/14/22
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date 85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded 40 mph down to 40 mph, then reduced by 5 mph, to 35 mph due to trucks present and ped/bike safety) CERTIFICATION: I, Ruth Smith, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Antioch was performed under my supervision, conforms to Sections 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic)*:

Recommendation
January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2020
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Partial bike lanes, sidewalk on both sides of the road.

Roadway Geometrics:
4-lane divided (raised median)
Comments:

Trucks present and ped/bike safety
Commercial / Medium Density Residential
Collision History
City of Antioch
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,895
1,795

0.34 Divided Roadway: Two Lanes Each Direction with Median Arterial
Speed Survey Data
EB: 38 mph / WB: 40 mph. Recommended speed limit based on greater 85th percentile speed of 40 mph.

EB: 29-38 mph / WB: 31-40 mph
35 mph
C-10
Appendix C
Location: Buchanan Road Survey Date: April 6, 2021
Between: Lucena Way & Contra Loma Boulevard Segment No: 11 Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.91
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group 35 mph
No
4/14/22
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date 85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded 41 mph down to 40 mph, then reduced by 5 mph, to 35 mph, due to residential density and ped/bike safety)
CERTIFICATION: I, Ruth Smith, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Antioch was performed under my supervision, conforms to Sections 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic)*:

Recommendation
January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2020
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Bike lanes and sidewalk on both sides of the road.

Roadway Geometrics:
4-lane divided (raised median), bike lanes
Comments:
residential density and ped/bike safety
Mixed Residential / Commercial
Collision History
City of Antioch
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
10,338
4,910

0.93 Divided Roadway: Two Lanes Each Direction with Median Arterial
Speed Survey Data
EB: 38 mph / WB: 41. Recommended speed limit based on greater 85th percentile speed of 41 mph.

EB: 30-39 mph / WB: 33-42 mph
35 mph
C-11
Appendix C
Location: Cavallo Road Survey Date: April 7, 2021
Between: E. Treagallas Road & 18th Street Segment No: 12 Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group 30 mph
Yes, 5 mph increase
4/14/22
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date 85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 35 mph, then reduced another 5 mph, to 30 mph, due to on-street parking, high driveway density, residential density, and ped/bike safety)
CERTIFICATION: I, Ruth Smith, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Antioch was performed under my supervision, conforms to Sections 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic)*:

Recommendation
January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2020
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes, sidewalk on both sides of the road. Near Rocketship Bidwell High School.

Roadway Geometrics:
2-lane undivided
Comments:
on-street parking, high driveway density, residential density, and ped/bike safety Residential
Collision History
City of Antioch
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
3,818
2,695

0.51 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
37 mph
25-34 mph
25 mph
C-12
Appendix C
Location: Cavallo Road Survey Date: April 9, 2021
Between: 18th Street & Wilbur Avenue Segment No: 13
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group 35 mph
No
4/14/22
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date 85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 40 mph, then reduced another 5 mph, to 35 mph, due to on-street parking, trucks present, residential density, and ped/bike safety)
CERTIFICATION: I, Ruth Smith, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Antioch was performed under my supervision, conforms to Sections 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic)*:

Recommendation
January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2020
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Bike lanes and sidewalk on both sides of the road. Near Rocketship Delta Prep Elementary School.

Roadway Geometrics:
2-lane undivided, with bike lanes
Comments:
on-street parking, trucks present, residential density, and ped/bike safety Residential
Collision History
City of Antioch
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
4,134
2,695

0.51 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
41 mph
29-38 mph
35 mph
C-13
Appendix C
Location: Dallas Ranch Road Survey Date: April 7, 2021
Between: Lone Tree Way & Mokelomne Drive Segment No: 14 Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.91
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group 45 mph
No
4/14/22
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date 85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded 48 mph up to 50 mph, then reduced by 5 mph, to 45 mph) CERTIFICATION: I, Ruth Smith, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Antioch was performed under my supervision, conforms to Sections 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic)*:

Recommendation
January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2020
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Bike lanes and sidewalk on both sides of the road. Near Dallas Ranch Middle School.

Roadway Geometrics:
4-lane divided (raised median) with bike lanes
Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
Collision History
City of Antioch
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
6,038
5,440

1.03 Divided Roadway: Two Lanes Each Direction with Median Arterial
Speed Survey Data
NB: 48 mph / SB: 47 mph. Recommended speed limit based on greater 85th percentile speed of 48 mph.

NB: 40-49 mph / SB: 38-47 mph
45 mph
C-14
Appendix C
Location: Deer Valley Road Survey Date: April 8, 2021
Between: Hillcrest Avenue & Lone Tree Way Segment No: 15 Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.91
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group 45 mph
No
4/14/22
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date 85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded 52 mph down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5 mph, to 45 mph, due to residential density and ped/bike safety)
CERTIFICATION: I, Ruth Smith, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Antioch was performed under my supervision, conforms to Sections 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic)*:

Recommendation
January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2020
1 0.04, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Bike lanes and sidewalk on both sides of the road. Near Deer Valley High School.

Roadway Geometrics:
4-lane divided (raised median)
Comments:
residential density and ped/bike safety
Mixed Residential / Commercial
Collision History
City of Antioch
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
11,563
9,770

1.85 Divided Roadway: Two Lanes Each Direction with Median Arterial
Speed Survey Data
NB: 52 mph / SB: 52 mph. Recommended speed limit based on greater 85th percentile speed of 52 mph.

NB: 41-50 mph / SB: 43-52 mph
45 mph
C-15
Appendix C
Location: Deer Valley Road Survey Date: April 8, 2021
Between: Lone Tree Way & Sand Creek Road Segment No: 16 Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.91
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group 45 mph
No
4/14/22
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date 85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded 51 mph down to 50 mph, then reduced by 5 mph, to 45 mph, due to trucks present, residential density, and ped/bike safety)
CERTIFICATION: I, Ruth Smith, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Antioch was performed under my supervision, conforms to Sections 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic)*:

Recommendation
January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2020
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Bike lanes and partial sidewalk on east side of road south of Kaiser Hospital on east side. Near Deer Valley High School.

Roadway Geometrics:
4-lane divided (raised median) with bike lanes
Comments:
trucks present, residential density, and ped/bike safety Mixed Residential / Commercial
Collision History
City of Antioch
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
13,030
4,280

0.81 Divided Roadway: Two Lanes Each Direction with Median Arterial
Speed Survey Data
NB: 49 mph / SB: 51 mph. Recommended speed limit based on greater 85th percentile speed of 51 mph.

NB: 39-48 / SB: 42-51 mph
45 mph
C-16
Appendix C
Location: Delta Fair Boulevard Survey Date: April 6, 2021 Between: West City Limits & Belle Drive Segment No: 17
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group 35 mph
No
4/14/22
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date 85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded 41 mph down to 40 mph, then reduced another 5 mph, to 35 mph, due to residential density and ped/bike safety)
CERTIFICATION: I, Ruth Smith, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Antioch was performed under my supervision, conforms to Sections 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic)*:

Recommendation
January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2020
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes and partial sidewalk.

Roadway Geometrics:
4-lane divided (raised median)
Comments:
residential density and ped/bike safety
Mixed High Density Residential / Office
Collision History
City of Antioch
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
10,429
1,430

0.27 Divided Roadway: Two Lanes Each Direction with Median Arterial
Speed Survey Data
EB: 41 / WB: 41. Recommended speed limit based on greater 85th percentile speed of 41 mph.

EB: 33-42 mph / WB: 29-38 mph
35 mph
C-17
Appendix C
Location: Delta Fair Boulevard Survey Date: April 6, 2021 Between: Kendree Street & Somersville Road Segment No: 18 Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group 30 mph
No
4/14/22
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date 85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded 36 mph down to 35 mph, then reduced another 5 mph, to 30 mph, due to on-street parking, high driveway density, residential density, and ped/bike safety) CERTIFICATION: I, Ruth Smith, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Antioch was performed under my supervision, conforms to Sections 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic)*:

Recommendation
January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2020
1 0.14, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes, sidewalk on both sides of the road.

Roadway Geometrics:
4-lane divided (raised median)
Comments:
on-street parking, high driveway density, residential density, and ped/bike safety Commercial
Collision History
City of Antioch
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
11,885
2,855

0.54 Divided Roadway: Two Lanes Each Direction with Median Arterial
Speed Survey Data
EB: 36 mph / WB: 35 mph. Recommended speed limit based on greater 85th percentile speed of 36 mph.

EB: 27-36 mph / WB: 26-35 mph
30 mph
C-18
Appendix C
Location: Delta Fair Boulevard Survey Date: April 7, 2021 Between: Somersville Road & Buchanan Road Segment No: 19 Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Antioch
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
12,839
1,480

0.28 Two Lanes Each Direction
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
37 mph
28-37 mph
30 mph
Recommendation
January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2020
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes, sidewalk on both sides of the road.

Roadway Geometrics:
4-lane undivided
Comments:
ped/bike safety
Commercial
30 mph
No
4/14/22
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date 85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 35 mph, then reduced another 5 mph, to 30 mph, due to ped/bike safety) CERTIFICATION: I, Ruth Smith, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Antioch was performed under my supervision, conforms to Sections 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic)*:

C-19
Appendix C
Location: Garrow Drive Survey Date: April 9, 2021
Between: E. Tregallas Road & Davison Drive Segment No: 20 Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Antioch
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
2,333
4,490

0.85 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
25 mph
17-26 mph
25 mph
Recommendation
January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2020
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes, sidewalk on both sides of the road. Near Belshaw Elementary School.

Roadway Geometrics:
2-lane undivided
Comments:
on-street parking, high driveway density, residential density, and ped/bike safety Residential
25 mph
No
4/14/22
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date 85th percentile speed
(rounded to 25 mph)
CERTIFICATION: I, Ruth Smith, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Antioch was performed under my supervision, conforms to Sections 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic)*:

C-20
Appendix C
Location: Hillcrest Avenue Survey Date: April 8, 2021
Between: 18th Street & Sunset Drive Segment No: 21
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.91
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Antioch
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
15,038
2,430

0.46 Divided Roadway: Two Lanes Each Direction with Median Arterial
Speed Survey Data
NB: 45 mph / SB: 45 mph. Recommended speed limit based on greater 85th percentile speed of 45 mph.

NB: 35-44 mph / SB: 35-44 mph
40 mph
Recommendation
January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2020
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Bike lanes and sidewalk on both sides of road. Near Bidwell High School.

Roadway Geometrics:
4-lane divided (raised median) with bike lanes
Comments:
ped/bike safety
Mixed Residential / Commercial
40 mph
No
4/14/22
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date 85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded 45 mph down to 45 mph, then reduced by 5 mph, to 40 mph, due to ped/bike safety) CERTIFICATION: I, Ruth Smith, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Antioch was performed under my supervision, conforms to Sections 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic)*:

C-21
Appendix C
Location: Hillcrest Avenue Survey Date: April 9, 2021
Between: Sunset Drive & Davison Drive Segment No: 22
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.91
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Antioch
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
36,441
2,905

0.55 Divided Roadway: Two Lanes Each Direction with Median Arterial
Speed Survey Data
NB: 46 mph / SB: 45 mph. Recommended speed limit based on greater 85th percentile speed of 46 mph.

NB: 35-44 mph / SB: 35-44 mph
45 mph
Recommendation
January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2020
1 0.05, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Bike lanes and sidewalk on both sides of road.

Roadway Geometrics:
6-lane divided (raised median) with bike lanes
Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Mixed Residential / Commercial
40 mph
Yes, 5 mph decrease
4/14/22
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date 85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded 46 mph down to 45 mph, then reduced another 5 mph, to 40 mph, due to trucks present and ped/bike safety)
CERTIFICATION: I, Ruth Smith, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Antioch was performed under my supervision, conforms to Sections 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic)*:

C-22
Appendix C
Location: Hillcrest Avenue Survey Date: April 8, 2021
Between: Davison Drive & Lone Tree Way Segment No: 23
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.91
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Antioch
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
11,626
9,770

1.85 Divided Roadway: Two Lanes Each Direction with Median Arterial
Speed Survey Data
NB: 45 mph / SB: 46 mph. Recommended speed limit based on greater 85th percentile speed of 46 mph.

NB: 34-43 mph / SB: 35-44 mph
45 mph
Recommendation
January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2020
1 0.04, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Bike lanes and sidewalk on both sides of road.

Roadway Geometrics:
4-lane divided (raised median) with bike lanes
Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Mixed Residential / Commercial / Open Space
40 mph
Yes, 5 mph decrease
4/14/22
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date 85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded 46 mph down to 45 mph, then reduced by 5 mph, to 40 mph, due to trucks present and ped/bike safety) CERTIFICATION: I, Ruth Smith, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Antioch was performed under my supervision, conforms to Sections 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic)*:

C-23
Appendix C
Location: James Donlon Boulevard Survey Date: April 7, 2021 Between: Somersville Road & Contra Loma Boulevard Segment No: 24 Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.91
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Antioch
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
9,541
8,240

1.56 Divided Roadway: Two Lanes Each Direction with Median Arterial
Speed Survey Data
EB: 50 mph / WB: 52 mph. Recommended speed limit based on greater 85th percentile speed of 52 mph.

EB: 41-50 mph / WB: 41-50 mph
40 mph
Recommendation
January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2020
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Bike lanes and sidewalk on both sides of road. Via Delta de Anza Trail crossing east of Gentrytown Drive.

Roadway Geometrics:
4-lane divided (raised median) with bike lanes
Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Mixed Residential / Commercial / Open Space
45 mph
Yes, 5 mph increase
4/14/22
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date 85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded 52 mph down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5 mph, to 45 mph, due to trucks present and ped/bike safety)
CERTIFICATION: I, Ruth Smith, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Antioch was performed under my supervision, conforms to Sections 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic)*:

C-24
Appendix C
Location: James Donlon Boulevard Survey Date: April 9, 2021 Between: Contra Loma Boulevard & Lone Tree Way Segment No: 25 Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.91
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Antioch
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
13,834
8,240

1.56 Divided Roadway: Two Lanes Each Direction with Median Arterial
Speed Survey Data
EB: 46 mph / WB: 47 mph. Recommended speed limit based on greater 85th percentile speed of 47 mph.

EB: 37-46 mph / WB: 37-46 mph
40 mph
Recommendation
January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2020
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Bike lanes and sidewalk on both sides of road. Near Worth Shaw Community Park.

Roadway Geometrics:
4-lane divided (raised median) with bike lanes
Comments:
residential density and ped/bike safety
Mixed Residential / Open Space
40 mph
No
4/14/22
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date 85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded 47 mph down to 45 mph, then reduced another 5 mph, to 40 mph, due to residential density and ped/bike safety)
CERTIFICATION: I, Ruth Smith, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Antioch was performed under my supervision, conforms to Sections 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic)*:

C-25
Appendix C
Location: Lone Tree Way Survey Date: April 7, 2021
Between: SR-4 & Putnam Street Segment No: 26
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.91
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Antioch
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
28,215
1,745

0.33 Divided Roadway: Two Lanes Each Direction with Median Arterial
Speed Survey Data
NB: 39 mph / SB: 40 mph. Recommended speed limit based on greater 85th percentile speed of 40 mph.

NB: 30-39 mph / SB: 30-39 mph
35 mph
Recommendation
January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2020
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Bike lanes (Class II and III) and sidewalk on both sides of road. Near Park Middle School.

Roadway Geometrics:
4-lane divided (raised median) with bike lanes
Comments:

Bike lanes, including Sharrows on both sides of road, although bicyclists not observed.

Commercial
35 mph
No
4/14/22
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date 85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded 40 mph down to 40 mph, then reduced by 5 mph, to 35 mph, due to ped/bike safety) CERTIFICATION: I, Ruth Smith, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Antioch was performed under my supervision, conforms to Sections 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic)*:

C-26
Appendix C
Location: Lone Tree Way Survey Date: April 7, 2021
Between: Putnam Street & James Donlon Boulevard Segment No: 27 Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.91
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Antioch
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
27,014
4,805

0.91 Divided Roadway: Two Lanes Each Direction with Median Arterial
Speed Survey Data
NB: 45 mph / SB: 45 mph. Recommended speed limit based on greater 85th percentile speed of 45 mph.

NB: 34-43 mph / SB: 36-45 mph
35 mph
Recommendation
January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2020
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Bike lanes (Class II and III) and sidewalk on both sides of road. Near Park Middle School and Sutter Delta Medical Center.

Roadway Geometrics:
4-lane divided (raised median) with bike lanes / 5-lane divided (raised median) with bike lanes Comments:
on-street parking, high driveway density, trucks present, and residential density Mixed Residential / Commercial
40 mph
Yes, 5 mph increase
4/14/22
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date 85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded 45 mph down to 45 mph, then reduced by 5 mph, to 40 mph, due to on-street parking, high driveway density, trucks present, and residential density)
CERTIFICATION: I, Ruth Smith, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Antioch was performed under my supervision, conforms to Sections 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic)*:

C-27
Appendix C
Location: Lone Tree Way Survey Date: April 9, 2021
Between: James Donlon Boulevard & Deer Valley Road Segment No: 28 Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.98
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Antioch
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
32,115
9,505

1.80 Divided Roadway: Three Lanes Each Direction with Median Arterial
Speed Survey Data
NB: 51 mph / SB: 49 mph. Recommended speed limit based on greater 85th percentile speed of 51 mph.

NB: 42-51 mph / SB: 40-49 mph
45 mph
Recommendation
January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2020
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Shared bike lanes (Class III) and sidewalk on both sides of road. Near Worth Shaw Community Park / Contra Loma Regional Park, Contra Costa Medical Career College and Dallas Ranch Middle School.

Roadway Geometrics:
6-lane divided (raised median) with bike route (sharrows) Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Mixed Residential / Commercial
45 mph
No
4/14/22
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date 85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded 51 mph down to 50 mph, then reduced by 5 mph, to 45 mph, due to trucks present and ped/bike safety) CERTIFICATION: I, Ruth Smith, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Antioch was performed under my supervision, conforms to Sections 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic)*:

C-28
Appendix C
Location: Lone Tree Way Survey Date: April 8, 2021
Between: Deer Valley Road & East City Limits Segment No: 29 Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.98
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Antioch
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
22,602
13,520

2.56 Divided Roadway: Three Lanes Each Direction with Median Arterial
Speed Survey Data
EB: 50 mph / WB: 51 mph. Recommended speed limit based on greater 85th percentile speed of 51 mph.

EB: 39-48 mph / WB: 41-50 mph
45 mph
Recommendation
January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2020
1 0.02, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Shared bike lanes (Class III) on both sides of road and partial sidewalk. Near Dallas Ranch Middle School and Deer Valley High School.

Roadway Geometrics:
6-lane divided (raised median) with bike route (sharrows) Comments:
trucks present, residential density, and ped/bike safety Mixed Residential / Commercial / Open Space
45 mph
No
4/14/22
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date 85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded 51 mph down to 50 mph, then reduced by 5 mph, to 45 mph, due to trucks present, residential density, and ped/bike safety)
CERTIFICATION: I, Ruth Smith, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Antioch was performed under my supervision, conforms to Sections 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic)*:

C-29
Appendix C
Location: Pittsburg-Antioch (W. 10th Street) Survey Date: April 7, 2021 Between: West City Limits & Auto Center Drive Segment No: 30 Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Antioch
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
9,884
3,910

0.74 Single Lane Each Direction
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
53 mph
44-53 mph
50 mph
Recommendation
January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2020
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

EB bike lane only, no sidewalk.

Roadway Geometrics:
2-lane undivided with two-way left turn lane
Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Commercial
50 mph
No
4/14/22
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date 85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 55 mph, then reduced by 5 mph, to 50 mph) CERTIFICATION: I, Ruth Smith, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Antioch was performed under my supervision, conforms to Sections 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic)*:

C-30
Appendix C
Location: Somersville Road Survey Date: April 7, 2021
Between: SR-4 & Buchanan Road Segment No: 31
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.91
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Antioch
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
12,365
2,855

0.54 Divided Roadway: Two Lanes Each Direction with Median Arterial
Speed Survey Data
NB: 34 mph / SB: 37 mph. Recommended speed limit based on greater 85th percentile speed of 37 mph.

NB: 26-35 mph / 28-37 mph
35 mph
Recommendation
January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2020
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes, sidewalk on both sides of road.

Roadway Geometrics:
5-lane divided (raised median) / 4-lane divided (raised median) Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Commercial
35 mph
No
4/14/22
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date 85th percentile speed
(rounded 37 mph down to 35 mph and took no further reductions) CERTIFICATION: I, Ruth Smith, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Antioch was performed under my supervision, conforms to Sections 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic)*:

C-31
Appendix C
Location: Wilbur Avenue Survey Date: April 8, 2021
Between: Cavallo Road & 1600 ft east of Minaker Drive Segment No: 32 Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.91
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Antioch
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
6,782
3,115

0.59 Divided Roadway: Two Lanes Each Direction with Median Arterial
Speed Survey Data
EB: 46 mph / WB: 47 mph. Recommended speed limit based on greater 85th percentile speed of 47 mph.

EB: 37-46 mph / 38-47 mph
40 mph
Recommendation
January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2020
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
bike lanes and sidewalk on both sides of road.

Roadway Geometrics:
4-lane divided (raised median) with bike lanes
Comments:
trucks present, residential density, and ped/bike safety Mixed Residential / Commercial / Industrial
40 mph
No
4/14/22
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date 85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded 47 mph down to 45 mph, then reduced another 5 mph, to 40 mph, due to trucks present, residential density, and ped/bike safety)
CERTIFICATION: I, Ruth Smith, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Antioch was performed under my supervision, conforms to Sections 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic)*:

C-32
Appendix C
Location: Wilbur Avenue Survey Date: April 9, 2021
Between: 1600 ft east of Minaker Drive & East City Limits Segment No: 33 Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.32
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Antioch
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
5,248
3,910

0.74 Single Lane Each Direction
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
52 mph
41-50 mph
45 mph
Recommendation
January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2020
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes nor sidewalks east of railroad crossing.

Roadway Geometrics:
2-lane undivided / 2-lane divided (raised median)
Comments:
trucks present
Mixed Commercial / Industrial / Open Space
45 mph
No
4/14/22
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date 85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5 mph, to 45 mph, due to trucks present) CERTIFICATION: I, Ruth Smith, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Antioch was performed under my supervision, conforms to Sections 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic)*:

C-33
Appendix C
Location: Wild Horse Road Survey Date: April 9, 2021
Between: Hillcrest Avenue & Wild Horse Road Easterly Terminus Segment No: 34 Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.91
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Antioch
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
3,375
4,645

0.88 Divided Roadway: Two Lanes Each Direction with Median Collector
Speed Survey Data
EB: 49 / WB: 43. Recommended speed limit based on greater 85th percentile speed of 49 mph.

EB: 39-48 mph / WB: 32-41 mph
45 mph
Recommendation
January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2020
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
4-lane divided (raised median) with bike lanes / 2-lane divided (painted median) with bike lanes Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
residential density and ped/bike safety
Mixed Residential / Commercial / Open Space
45 mph
No
4/14/22
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date 85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded 49 mph up to 50 mph, then reduced by 5 mph, to 45 mph) CERTIFICATION: I, Ruth Smith, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Antioch was performed under my supervision, conforms to Sections 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic)*:

C-34
Appendix C
Location: Worrell Road Survey Date: April 8, 2021
Between: Lone Tree Way & Garrow Drive Segment No: 35
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Antioch
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
1,506
2,800

0.53 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
31 mph
23-32 mph
25 mph
Recommendation
January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2020
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes, sidewalk on both sides of road between Lone Tree Way and Roosevelt, sidewalk only on south side between Roosevelt and Garrow Drive. Near Kings Chapel Antioch and Belshaw Elementary School.

Roadway Geometrics:
2-lane undivided. Vertical curve between Roosevelt Lane and Garrow Drive.

Comments:
on-street parking, high driveway density, not obvious vertical curve, and residential density Mixed Residential / Commercial / Public Institution
25 mph
No
4/14/22
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date 85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 30 mph, then reduced another 5 mph, to 25 mph, due to on-street parking, high driveway density, not obvious vertical curve, and residential density) CERTIFICATION: I, Ruth Smith, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Antioch was performed under my supervision, conforms to Sections 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic)*:

C-35
Appendix C

APPENDIX D
Speed Survey Data Sheets

Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 25 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 5
20 3
21 5
22 4
23 6
24 9
25 10
26 13
27 9
28 13
29 10
30 11
31 7
32 3
33 2
34 2
35 4
36 37 1
38 39 2
40 41 2
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 121 19 - 41 27 mph 31 mph 22 - 31 92 76% 10% / 13 14% / 16

SPEED PARAMETERS
W 2nd St Bet. L St & G St
City of Antioch
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
14:45-16:00
4/8/2021
Project #: 21-080049-054
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-1
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 25 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 3
20 1
21 3
22 2
23 2
24 7
25 4
26 3
27 4
28 6
29 5
30 5
31 1
32 3
33 34 1
35 3
36 37
38 39
40 41 1
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 54 19 - 41 27 mph 31 mph 21 - 30 41 76% 7% / 4 17% / 9

SPEED PARAMETERS
W 2nd St Bet. L St & G St
City of Antioch
Eastbound Spot Speeds
14:45-16:00
4/8/2021
Project #: 21-080049-054
02468
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-2
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 25 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 2
20 2
21 2
22 2
23 4
24 2
25 6
26 10
27 5
28 7
29 5
30 6
31 6
32 33 2
34 1
35 1
36 37 1
38 39 2
40 41 1
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 67 19 - 41 27 mph 31 mph 22 - 31 53 79% 8% / 6 12% / 8

SPEED PARAMETERS
W 2nd St Bet. L St & G St
City of Antioch
Westbound Spot Speeds
14:45-16:00
4/8/2021
Project #: 21-080049-054
02468 1 0 1 2
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-3
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 25 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16 2
17 2
18 3
19 8
20 5
21 12
22 11
23 6
24 8
25 12
26 10
27 10
28 4
29 8
30 5
31 2
32 3
33 2
34 2
35 36 1
37 38
39 40
41 42
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 116 16 - 36 25 mph 29 mph 19 - 28 86 74% 6% / 7 20% / 23

SPEED PARAMETERS
W 4th St Bet. L St & C St
City of Antioch
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
12:35-14:35
4/8/2021
Project #: 21-080049-028
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-4
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 25 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 1
18 1
19 4
20 1
21 9
22 6
23 6
24 4
25 7
26 7
27 5
28 2
29 4
30 2
31 32 1
33 2
34 35
36 1
37 38
39 40
41 42
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 63 17 - 36 24 mph 29 mph 21 - 30 52 83% 11% / 7 7% / 4

SPEED PARAMETERS
W 4th St Bet. L St & C St
City of Antioch
Eastbound Spot Speeds
12:35-14:35
4/8/2021
Project #: 21-080049-028
02468 1 0
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-5
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 25 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16 2
17 1
18 2
19 4
20 4
21 3
22 5
23 24 4
25 5
26 3
27 5
28 2
29 4
30 3
31 2
32 2
33 34 2
35 36
37 38
39 40
41 42
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 53 16 - 34 25 mph 30 mph 18 - 27 35 66% 5% / 3 29% / 15

SPEED PARAMETERS
W 4th St Bet. L St & C St
City of Antioch
Westbound Spot Speeds
12:35-14:35
4/8/2021
Project #: 21-080049-028
0246
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-6
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 25 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20 2
21 22 5
23 7
24 6
25 9
26 9
27 8
28 8
29 15
30 7
31 6
32 8
33 4
34 2
35 2
36 5
37 1
38 1
39 40
41 42
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 105 20 - 38 28 mph 32 mph 23 - 32 83 79% 6% / 7 15% / 15

SPEED PARAMETERS
W 6th St Bet. L St & A St
City of Antioch
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
10:05-12:05
4/7/2021
Project #: 21-080049-055
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-7
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 25 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22 3
23 5
24 3
25 2
26 4
27 3
28 3
29 7
30 1
31 1
32 3
33 2
34 1
35 36 4
37 38
39 40
41 42
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 42 22 - 36 28 mph 33 mph 22 - 31 32 76% 0% / 0 24% / 10

SPEED PARAMETERS
W 6th St Bet. L St & A St
City of Antioch
Eastbound Spot Speeds
10:05-12:05
4/7/2021
Project #: 21-080049-055
02468
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-8
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 25 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20 2
21 22 2
23 2
24 3
25 7
26 5
27 5
28 5
29 8
30 6
31 5
32 5
33 2
34 1
35 2
36 1
37 1
38 1
39 40
41 42
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 63 20 - 38 29 mph 32 mph 23 - 32 51 81% 6% / 4 13% / 8

SPEED PARAMETERS
W 6th St Bet. L St & A St
City of Antioch
Westbound Spot Speeds
10:05-12:05
4/7/2021
Project #: 21-080049-055
02468 1 0
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-9
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 1
26 27
28 1
29 2
30 4
31 1
32 5
33 9
34 8
35 26
36 17
37 19
38 21
39 20
40 23
41 20
42 11
43 4
44 5
45 1
46 1
47 48 3
49 50 2
51 1
52 1
53 54
55 1
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 207 25 - 55 38 mph 41 mph 33 - 42 174 84% 6% / 14 10% / 19

SPEED PARAMETERS
W 10th St Bet. Auto Center Dr & L St
City of Antioch
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
10:10-10:55
4/7/2021
Project #: 21-080049-058
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-10
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 1
26 27
28 1
29 1
30 4
31 32 2
33 5
34 2
35 9
36 5
37 9
38 10
39 10
40 16
41 13
42 6
43 1
44 1
45 46 1
47 48 2
49 50 2
51 1
52 1
53 54
55 1
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 104 25 - 55 39 mph 42 mph 33 - 42 85 82% 8% / 9 10% / 10

SPEED PARAMETERS
W 10th St Bet. Auto Center Dr & L St
City of Antioch
Eastbound Spot Speeds
10:10-10:55
4/7/2021
Project #: 21-080049-058
02468 1 0 1 2 1 4 1 6 1 8
70 68
66 64
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-11
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 1
30 31 1
32 3
33 4
34 6
35 17
36 12
37 10
38 11
39 10
40 7
41 7
42 5
43 3
44 4
45 1
46 47
48 1
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 103 29 - 48 37 mph 41 mph 33 - 42 89 86% 4% / 5 9% / 9

SPEED PARAMETERS
W 10th St Bet. Auto Center Dr & L St
City of Antioch
Westbound Spot Speeds
10:10-10:55
4/7/2021
Project #: 21-080049-058
02468 1 0 1 2 1 4 1 6 1 8
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-12
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 2
28 1
29 1
30 5
31 3
32 5
33 14
34 13
35 28
36 25
37 17
38 13
39 21
40 22
41 8
42 6
43 10
44 6
45 5
46 2
47 1
48 2
49 2
50 2
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 214 27 - 50 37 mph 42 mph 33 - 42 167 78% 7% / 17 15% / 30

SPEED PARAMETERS
E 18th St Bet. A St & Cavallo Rd
City of Antioch
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
12:50-13:30
4/7/2021
Project #: 21-080049-023
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-13
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 2
28 29
30 3
31 32 2
33 4
34 7
35 14
36 13
37 6
38 9
39 10
40 11
41 5
42 2
43 5
44 2
45 2
46 2
47 48
49 1
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 27 - 49 37 mph 41 mph 34 - 43 82 82% 11% / 11 7% / 7

SPEED PARAMETERS
E 18th St Bet. A St & Cavallo Rd
City of Antioch
Eastbound Spot Speeds
12:50-13:30
4/7/2021
Project #: 21-080049-023
02468 1 0 1 2 1 4 1 6
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-14
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28 1
29 1
30 2
31 3
32 3
33 10
34 6
35 14
36 12
37 11
38 4
39 11
40 11
41 3
42 4
43 5
44 4
45 3
46 47 1
48 2
49 1
50 2
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 114 28 - 50 37 mph 43 mph 33 - 42 86 75% 8% / 10 16% / 18

SPEED PARAMETERS
E 18th St Bet. A St & Cavallo Rd
City of Antioch
Westbound Spot Speeds
12:50-13:30
4/7/2021
Project #: 21-080049-023
02468 1 0 1 2 1 4 1 6
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-15
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 45 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32 1
33 1
34 35 3
36 5
37 8
38 8
39 9
40 15
41 13
42 12
43 15
44 13
45 24
46 16
47 10
48 11
49 11
50 12
51 6
52 5
53 5
54 1
55 56 2
57 58 2
59 60 1
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 209 32 - 60 45 mph 50 mph 40 - 49 140 67% 16% / 35 17% / 34

SPEED PARAMETERS
E 18th St Bet. Hillcrest Ave & East City Limits
City of Antioch
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
14:50-15:35
4/7/2021
Project #: 21-080049-025
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-16
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 45 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32 1
33 34
35 1
36 2
37 3
38 2
39 4
40 6
41 5
42 3
43 6
44 5
45 12
46 8
47 7
48 8
49 5
50 9
51 3
52 4
53 1
54 1
55 56 1
57 58 2
59 60 1
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 32 - 60 45 mph 50 mph 41 - 50 68 68% 19% / 19 13% / 13

SPEED PARAMETERS
E 18th St Bet. Hillcrest Ave & East City Limits
City of Antioch
Eastbound Spot Speeds
14:50-15:35
4/7/2021
Project #: 21-080049-025
02468 1 0 1 2 1 4
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-17
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 45 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 1
34 35 2
36 3
37 5
38 6
39 5
40 9
41 8
42 9
43 9
44 8
45 12
46 8
47 3
48 3
49 6
50 3
51 3
52 1
53 4
54 55
56 1
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 109 33 - 56 43 mph 49 mph 37 - 46 79 72% 5% / 6 23% / 24

SPEED PARAMETERS
E 18th St Bet. Hillcrest Ave & East City Limits
City of Antioch
Westbound Spot Speeds
14:50-15:35
4/7/2021
Project #: 21-080049-025
02468 1 0 1 2 1 4
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-18
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 4
26 1
27 3
28 1
29 3
30 3
31 3
32 13
33 7
34 7
35 12
36 13
37 15
38 21
39 15
40 14
41 10
42 13
43 6
44 2
45 4
46 1
47 48 2
49 50 2
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 175 25 - 50 38 mph 42 mph 32 - 41 127 73% 10% / 18 18% / 30

SPEED PARAMETERS
AutoCenter Dr/Somersville Rd Bet. 4th St & 10th St
City of Antioch
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
09:15-10:15
4/6/2021
Project #: 21-080049-004
0 5 10 15 20 25
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-19
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 1
26 27 1
28 1
29 1
30 1
31 32 5
33 4
34 2
35 8
36 8
37 7
38 9
39 7
40 8
41 2
42 7
43 3
44 2
45 2
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 79 25 - 45 38 mph 42 mph 33 - 42 62 78% 12% / 10 9% / 7

SPEED PARAMETERS
AutoCenter Dr/Somersville Rd Bet. 4th St & 10th St
City of Antioch
Northbound Spot Speeds
09:15-10:15
4/6/2021
Project #: 21-080049-004
02468 1 0
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-20
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 3
26 1
27 2
28 29 2
30 2
31 3
32 8
33 3
34 5
35 4
36 5
37 8
38 12
39 8
40 6
41 8
42 6
43 3
44 45 2
46 1
47 48 2
49 50 2
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 96 25 - 50 38 mph 42 mph 32 - 41 67 70% 13% / 13 17% / 16

SPEED PARAMETERS
AutoCenter Dr/Somersville Rd Bet. 4th St & 10th St
City of Antioch
Southbound Spot Speeds
09:15-10:15
4/6/2021
Project #: 21-080049-004
02468 1 0 1 2 1 4
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-21
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 2
26 1
27 4
28 3
29 6
30 6
31 8
32 15
33 17
34 15
35 13
36 11
37 11
38 16
39 10
40 7
41 1
42 8
43 3
44 4
45 1
46 3
47 1
48 1
49 1
50 1
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 169 25 - 50 35 mph 40 mph 31 - 40 123 73% 13% / 22 15% / 24

SPEED PARAMETERS
AutoCenter Dr Bet. SPRR & SR 4
City of Antioch
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
12:15-13:15
4/9/2021
Project #: 21-080049-006
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-22
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 2
26 1
27 3
28 1
29 2
30 3
31 2
32 5
33 12
34 5
35 5
36 3
37 8
38 4
39 7
40 3
41 42 6
43 3
44 1
45 1
46 3
47 48
49 1
50 1
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 82 25 - 50 35 mph 42 mph 30 - 39 54 66% 10% / 9 24% / 19

SPEED PARAMETERS
AutoCenter Dr Bet. SPRR & SR 4
City of Antioch
Northbound Spot Speeds
12:15-13:15
4/9/2021
Project #: 21-080049-006
02468 1 0 1 2 1 4
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-23
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 1
28 2
29 4
30 3
31 6
32 10
33 5
34 10
35 8
36 8
37 3
38 12
39 3
40 4
41 1
42 2
43 44 3
45 46
47 1
48 1
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 87 27 - 48 35 mph 39 mph 29 - 38 69 79% 3% / 3 18% / 15

SPEED PARAMETERS
AutoCenter Dr Bet. SPRR & SR 4
City of Antioch
Southbound Spot Speeds
12:15-13:15
4/9/2021
Project #: 21-080049-006
02468 1 0 1 2 1 4
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-24
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 45 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32 1
33 34 5
35 3
36 1
37 38 8
39 4
40 8
41 16
42 18
43 21
44 22
45 18
46 15
47 16
48 17
49 11
50 10
51 6
52 5
53 2
54 1
55 1
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 209 32 - 55 44 mph 49 mph 41 - 50 164 78% 14% / 30 8% / 15

SPEED PARAMETERS
Buchanan Rd Bet. City Limits & Somersville Rd
City of Antioch
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
10:10-10:45
4/6/2021
Project #: 21-080049-007
0 5 10 15 20 25
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-25
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 45 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34 2
35 2
36 37
38 1
39 1
40 4
41 8
42 7
43 7
44 10
45 9
46 7
47 9
48 10
49 7
50 7
51 4
52 5
53 2
54 1
55 1
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 104 34 - 55 46 mph 50 mph 41 - 50 81 78% 9% / 10 13% / 13

SPEED PARAMETERS
Buchanan Rd Bet. City Limits & Somersville Rd
City of Antioch
Eastbound Spot Speeds
10:10-10:45
4/6/2021
Project #: 21-080049-007
02468 1 0 1 2
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-26
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 45 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32 1
33 34 3
35 1
36 1
37 38 7
39 3
40 4
41 8
42 11
43 14
44 12
45 9
46 8
47 7
48 7
49 4
50 3
51 2
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 105 32 - 51 43 mph 48 mph 40 - 49 84 80% 15% / 16 5% / 5

SPEED PARAMETERS
Buchanan Rd Bet. City Limits & Somersville Rd
City of Antioch
Westbound Spot Speeds
10:10-10:45
4/6/2021
Project #: 21-080049-007
02468 1 0 1 2 1 4 1 6
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-27
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22 1
23 24 2
25 26 2
27 2
28 5
29 3
30 9
31 9
32 13
33 18
34 18
35 16
36 25
37 22
38 20
39 10
40 5
41 8
42 7
43 4
44 2
45 1
46 47 1
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 203 22 - 47 36 mph 39 mph 30 - 39 160 79% 7% / 15 14% / 28

SPEED PARAMETERS
Buchanan Rd Bet. Somersville Rd & Gentrytown Dr
City of Antioch
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
10:55-11:45
4/6/2021
Project #: 21-080049-008
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-28
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22 1
23 24 1
25 26 1
27 1
28 3
29 2
30 7
31 5
32 7
33 11
34 10
35 9
36 13
37 11
38 8
39 1
40 2
41 4
42 2
43 1
44 1
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 101 22 - 44 35 mph 38 mph 29 - 38 83 82% 6% / 7 11% / 11

SPEED PARAMETERS
Buchanan Rd Bet. Somersville Rd & Gentrytown Dr
City of Antioch
Eastbound Spot Speeds
10:55-11:45
4/6/2021
Project #: 21-080049-008
02468 1 0 1 2 1 4
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-29
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24 1
25 26 1
27 1
28 2
29 1
30 2
31 4
32 6
33 7
34 8
35 7
36 12
37 11
38 12
39 9
40 3
41 4
42 5
43 3
44 1
45 1
46 47 1
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 102 24 - 47 36 mph 40 mph 31 - 40 79 77% 7% / 8 15% / 15

SPEED PARAMETERS
Buchanan Rd Bet. Somersville Rd & Gentrytown Dr
City of Antioch
Westbound Spot Speeds
10:55-11:45
4/6/2021
Project #: 21-080049-008
02468 1 0 1 2 1 4
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-30
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24 2
25 26 1
27 3
28 7
29 5
30 11
31 8
32 8
33 18
34 19
35 19
36 20
37 16
38 20
39 15
40 11
41 6
42 8
43 2
44 1
45 2
46 2
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 204 24 - 46 36 mph 40 mph 30 - 39 154 75% 8% / 18 16% / 32

SPEED PARAMETERS
Buchanan Rd Bet. Gentrytown Dr & Contra Loma Blvd
City of Antioch
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
11:50-12:20
4/6/2021
Project #: 21-080049-009
0 5 10 15 20 25
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-31
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24 1
25 26 1
27 2
28 4
29 2
30 9
31 5
32 5
33 10
34 13
35 11
36 12
37 8
38 7
39 5
40 4
41 1
42 3
43 1
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 104 24 - 43 34 mph 38 mph 30 - 39 85 82% 9% / 10 9% / 9

SPEED PARAMETERS
Buchanan Rd Bet. Gentrytown Dr & Contra Loma Blvd
City of Antioch
Eastbound Spot Speeds
11:50-12:20
4/6/2021
Project #: 21-080049-009
02468 1 0 1 2 1 4
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-32
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24 1
25 26
27 1
28 3
29 3
30 2
31 3
32 3
33 8
34 6
35 8
36 8
37 8
38 13
39 10
40 7
41 5
42 5
43 1
44 1
45 2
46 2
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 24 - 46 37 mph 41 mph 33 - 42 78 78% 16% / 16 6% / 6

SPEED PARAMETERS
Buchanan Rd Bet. Gentrytown Dr & Contra Loma Blvd
City of Antioch
Westbound Spot Speeds
11:50-12:20
4/6/2021
Project #: 21-080049-009
02468 1 0 1 2 1 4
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-33
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 25 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22 2
23 3
24 3
25 8
26 7
27 9
28 15
29 12
30 19
31 12
32 14
33 5
34 8
35 7
36 8
37 5
38 3
39 5
40 2
41 1
42 3
43 1
44 2
45 3
46 47
48 1
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 158 22 - 48 31 mph 37 mph 25 - 34 109 69% 5% / 8 26% / 41

SPEED PARAMETERS
Cavallo Rd Bet. E Tregallas Rd & E 18th St
City of Antioch
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
11:40-12:40
4/7/2021
Project #: 21-080049-010
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-34
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 25 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22 1
23 1
24 2
25 4
26 5
27 4
28 9
29 8
30 10
31 7
32 5
33 2
34 4
35 3
36 2
37 2
38 1
39 3
40 41
42 43 1
44 1
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 75 22 - 44 30 mph 35 mph 25 - 34 58 77% 5% / 4 18% / 13

SPEED PARAMETERS
Cavallo Rd Bet. E Tregallas Rd & E 18th St
City of Antioch
Northbound Spot Speeds
11:40-12:40
4/7/2021
Project #: 21-080049-010
02468 1 0 1 2
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-35
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 25 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22 1
23 2
24 1
25 4
26 2
27 5
28 6
29 4
30 9
31 5
32 9
33 3
34 4
35 4
36 6
37 3
38 2
39 2
40 2
41 1
42 3
43 44 1
45 3
46 47
48 1
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 83 22 - 48 32 mph 39 mph 27 - 36 55 66% 12% / 10 22% / 18

SPEED PARAMETERS
Cavallo Rd Bet. E Tregallas Rd & E 18th St
City of Antioch
Southbound Spot Speeds
11:40-12:40
4/7/2021
Project #: 21-080049-010
02468 1 0
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-36
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22 1
23 24 1
25 1
26 2
27 2
28 3
29 6
30 4
31 12
32 9
33 6
34 11
35 14
36 17
37 17
38 15
39 3
40 6
41 7
42 7
43 6
44 2
45 1
46 2
47 48 1
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 156 22 - 48 36 mph 41 mph 29 - 38 111 71% 6% / 10 23% / 35

SPEED PARAMETERS
Cavallo Rd Bet. E 18th St & Wilbur Ave
City of Antioch
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
11:00-12:00
4/9/2021
Project #: 21-080049-011
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-37
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22 1
23 24 1
25 26
27 28
29 4
30 1
31 7
32 4
33 4
34 6
35 8
36 10
37 8
38 4
39 1
40 3
41 3
42 4
43 2
44 1
45 1
46 1
47 48 1
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 75 22 - 48 36 mph 41 mph 29 - 38 56 75% 2% / 2 23% / 17

SPEED PARAMETERS
Cavallo Rd Bet. E 18th St & Wilbur Ave
City of Antioch
Northbound Spot Speeds
11:00-12:00
4/9/2021
Project #: 21-080049-011
02468 1 0 1 2
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-38
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 1
26 2
27 2
28 3
29 2
30 3
31 5
32 5
33 2
34 5
35 6
36 7
37 9
38 11
39 2
40 3
41 4
42 3
43 4
44 1
45 46 1
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 81 25 - 46 36 mph 41 mph 29 - 38 55 68% 9% / 8 23% / 18

SPEED PARAMETERS
Cavallo Rd Bet. E 18th St & Wilbur Ave
City of Antioch
Southbound Spot Speeds
11:00-12:00
4/9/2021
Project #: 21-080049-011
02468 1 0 1 2
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-39
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 45 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34 2
35 2
36 3
37 4
38 6
39 8
40 8
41 9
42 8
43 10
44 9
45 10
46 5
47 6
48 5
49 6
50 3
51 2
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 106 34 - 51 43 mph 48 mph 38 - 47 79 75% 10% / 11 16% / 16

SPEED PARAMETERS
Dallas Ranch Rd Bet. Lone Tree Way & Mokelumne Dr
City of Antioch
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
13:10-14:10
4/7/2021
Project #: 21-080049-014
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-40
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 45 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34
35 1
36 2
37 2
38 2
39 2
40 2
41 3
42 5
43 7
44 7
45 5
46 2
47 3
48 2
49 3
50 2
51 2
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 52 35 - 51 43 mph 48 mph 40 - 49 39 75% 17% / 9 8% / 4

SPEED PARAMETERS
Dallas Ranch Rd Bet. Lone Tree Way & Mokelumne Dr
City of Antioch
Northbound Spot Speeds
13:10-14:10
4/7/2021
Project #: 21-080049-014
02468
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-41
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 45 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34 2
35 1
36 1
37 2
38 4
39 6
40 6
41 6
42 3
43 3
44 2
45 5
46 3
47 3
48 3
49 3
50 1
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 54 34 - 50 41 mph 47 mph 38 - 47 41 76% 11% / 6 13% / 7

SPEED PARAMETERS
Dallas Ranch Rd Bet. Lone Tree Way & Mokelumne Dr
City of Antioch
Southbound Spot Speeds
13:10-14:10
4/7/2021
Project #: 21-080049-014
02468
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-42
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 45 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34 1
35 1
36 3
37 3
38 4
39 3
40 6
41 7
42 10
43 10
44 12
45 15
46 21
47 18
48 15
49 13
50 16
51 9
52 12
53 9
54 6
55 2
56 1
57 2
58 1
59 1
60 3
61 1
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 205 34 - 61 47 mph 52 mph 43 - 52 141 69% 18% / 38 13% / 26

SPEED PARAMETERS
Deer Valley Rd Bet. Hillcrest Ave & Lone Tree Way
City of Antioch
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
14:50-15:45
4/8/2021
Project #: 21-080049-016
0 5 10 15 20 25
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-43
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 45 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34 1
35 36 1
37 2
38 2
39 2
40 3
41 5
42 5
43 6
44 7
45 8
46 10
47 8
48 7
49 6
50 5
51 4
52 5
53 5
54 3
55 1
56 1
57 1
58 59 1
60 2
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 101 34 - 60 46 mph 52 mph 41 - 50 67 66% 10% / 11 23% / 23

SPEED PARAMETERS
Deer Valley Rd Bet. Hillcrest Ave & Lone Tree Way
City of Antioch
Northbound Spot Speeds
14:50-15:45
4/8/2021
Project #: 21-080049-016
02468 1 0 1 2
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-44
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 45 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34
35 1
36 2
37 1
38 2
39 1
40 3
41 2
42 5
43 4
44 5
45 7
46 11
47 10
48 8
49 7
50 11
51 5
52 7
53 4
54 3
55 1
56 57 1
58 1
59 60 1
61 1
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 104 35 - 61 47 mph 52 mph 43 - 52 75 72% 16% / 17 12% / 12

SPEED PARAMETERS
Deer Valley Rd Bet. Hillcrest Ave & Lone Tree Way
City of Antioch
Southbound Spot Speeds
14:50-15:45
4/8/2021
Project #: 21-080049-016
02468 1 0 1 2
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-45
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 45 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34 1
35 1
36 4
37 5
38 7
39 7
40 7
41 11
42 11
43 16
44 16
45 13
46 16
47 21
48 16
49 12
50 11
51 11
52 7
53 3
54 3
55 1
56 1
57 58
59 1
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 202 34 - 59 46 mph 50 mph 41 - 50 143 71% 15% / 32 14% / 27

SPEED PARAMETERS
Deer Valley Rd Bet. Lone Tree Way & Mammoth Way
City of Antioch
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
13:45-14:35
4/8/2021
Project #: 21-080049-017
0 5 10 15 20 25
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-46
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 45 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34 1
35 1
36 3
37 3
38 3
39 5
40 4
41 6
42 7
43 10
44 8
45 7
46 8
47 10
48 8
49 4
50 4
51 4
52 3
53 1
54 1
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 101 34 - 54 44 mph 49 mph 39 - 48 73 72% 10% / 11 17% / 17

SPEED PARAMETERS
Deer Valley Rd Bet. Lone Tree Way & Mammoth Way
City of Antioch
Northbound Spot Speeds
13:45-14:35
4/8/2021
Project #: 21-080049-017
02468 1 0 1 2
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-47
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 45 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34
35 36 1
37 2
38 4
39 2
40 3
41 5
42 4
43 6
44 8
45 6
46 8
47 11
48 8
49 8
50 7
51 7
52 4
53 2
54 2
55 1
56 1
57 58
59 1
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 101 36 - 59 47 mph 51 mph 42 - 51 73 72% 16% / 17 11% / 11

SPEED PARAMETERS
Deer Valley Rd Bet. Lone Tree Way & Mammoth Way
City of Antioch
Southbound Spot Speeds
13:45-14:35
4/8/2021
Project #: 21-080049-017
02468 1 0 1 2
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-48
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 30 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 2
26 2
27 2
28 5
29 9
30 10
31 6
32 11
33 15
34 21
35 19
36 17
37 18
38 16
39 13
40 16
41 11
42 14
43 5
44 4
45 3
46 2
47 1
48 1
49 50 1
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 224 25 - 50 36 mph 41 mph 33 - 42 160 71% 20% / 47 8% / 17

SPEED PARAMETERS
Delta Fair Blvd Bet. City Limits & Belle Dr
City of Antioch
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
12:30-13:05
4/6/2021
Project #: 21-080049-019
0 5 10 15 20 25
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-49
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 30 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 1
26 27
28 3
29 4
30 3
31 1
32 4
33 7
34 11
35 9
36 10
37 9
38 7
39 9
40 10
41 8
42 7
43 4
44 1
45 1
46 47 1
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 110 25 - 47 37 mph 41 mph 33 - 42 87 79% 14% / 16 7% / 7

SPEED PARAMETERS
Delta Fair Blvd Bet. City Limits & Belle Dr
City of Antioch
Northbound Spot Speeds
12:30-13:05
4/6/2021
Project #: 21-080049-019
02468 1 0 1 2
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-50
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 30 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 1
26 2
27 2
28 2
29 5
30 7
31 5
32 7
33 8
34 10
35 10
36 7
37 9
38 9
39 4
40 6
41 3
42 7
43 1
44 3
45 2
46 2
47 48 1
49 50 1
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 114 25 - 50 35 mph 41 mph 29 - 38 77 68% 6% / 7 27% / 30

SPEED PARAMETERS
Delta Fair Blvd Bet. City Limits & Belle Dr
City of Antioch
Southbound Spot Speeds
12:30-13:05
4/6/2021
Project #: 21-080049-019
02468 1 0 1 2
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-51
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 30 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 1
22 1
23 24 1
25 3
26 6
27 10
28 18
29 20
30 24
31 20
32 22
33 21
34 17
35 12
36 10
37 6
38 6
39 5
40 6
41 1
42 43
44 1
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 211 21 - 44 32 mph 36 mph 27 - 36 174 82% 5% / 12 12% / 25

SPEED PARAMETERS
Delta Fair Blvd Bet. Kendree St & Somersville Rd
City of Antioch
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
14:45-15:15
4/6/2021
Project #: 21-080049-021
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-52
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 30 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24 1
25 2
26 3
27 4
28 7
29 9
30 10
31 9
32 12
33 11
34 9
35 7
36 7
37 3
38 4
39 3
40 3
41 1
42 43
44 1
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 106 24 - 44 32 mph 36 mph 27 - 36 85 80% 5% / 6 15% / 15

SPEED PARAMETERS
Delta Fair Blvd Bet. Kendree St & Somersville Rd
City of Antioch
Eastbound Spot Speeds
14:45-15:15
4/6/2021
Project #: 21-080049-021
02468 1 0 1 2 1 4
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-53
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 30 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 1
22 1
23 24
25 1
26 3
27 6
28 11
29 11
30 14
31 11
32 10
33 10
34 8
35 5
36 3
37 3
38 2
39 2
40 3
41 42
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 105 21 - 40 31 mph 35 mph 26 - 35 89 85% 2% / 3 13% / 13

SPEED PARAMETERS
Delta Fair Blvd Bet. Kendree St & Somersville Rd
City of Antioch
Westbound Spot Speeds
14:45-15:15
4/6/2021
Project #: 21-080049-021
02468 1 0 1 2 1 4 1 6
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-54
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 30 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18 1
19 20
21 22
23 24 1
25 2
26 3
27 3
28 11
29 10
30 21
31 25
32 21
33 26
34 16
35 23
36 23
37 15
38 9
39 8
40 4
41 3
42 1
43 4
44 2
45 46
47 48 1
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 233 18 - 48 33 mph 37 mph 28 - 37 191 82% 4% / 10 14% / 32

SPEED PARAMETERS
Delta Fair Blvd Bet. Somersville Rd & Buchanan Rd
City of Antioch
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
09:00-10:00
4/7/2021
Project #: 21-080049-022
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-55
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 30 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18 1
19 20
21 22
23 24 1
25 1
26 3
27 1
28 4
29 4
30 10
31 15
32 11
33 15
34 9
35 13
36 13
37 7
38 2
39 4
40 1
41 2
42 1
43 1
44 45
46 47
48 1
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 120 18 - 48 33 mph 37 mph 28 - 37 101 84% 5% / 7 10% / 12

SPEED PARAMETERS
Delta Fair Blvd Bet. Somersville Rd & Buchanan Rd
City of Antioch
Northbound Spot Speeds
09:00-10:00
4/7/2021
Project #: 21-080049-022
02468 1 0 1 2 1 4 1 6
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-56
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 30 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 1
26 27 2
28 7
29 6
30 11
31 10
32 10
33 11
34 7
35 10
36 10
37 8
38 7
39 4
40 3
41 1
42 43 3
44 2
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 113 25 - 44 33 mph 38 mph 28 - 37 90 80% 2% / 3 18% / 20

SPEED PARAMETERS
Delta Fair Blvd Bet. Somersville Rd & Buchanan Rd
City of Antioch
Southbound Spot Speeds
09:00-10:00
4/7/2021
Project #: 21-080049-022
02468 1 0 1 2
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-57
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 25 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 1
16 1
17 5
18 9
19 10
20 8
21 12
22 12
23 12
24 12
25 11
26 6
27 2
28 2
29 1
30 31
32 33
34 35
36 37
38 39
40 41
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 104 15 - 29 22 mph 25 mph 17 - 26 97 93% 1% / 2 5% / 5

SPEED PARAMETERS
Garrow Dr Bet. E Tregallas Rd & Davison Dr
City of Antioch
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
11:15-12:20
4/9/2021
Project #: 21-080049-031
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-58
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 25 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 1
16 1
17 4
18 8
19 7
20 6
21 8
22 6
23 5
24 4
25 2
26 1
27 28 1
29 30
31 32
33 34
35 36
37 38
39 40
41 42
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 54 15 - 28 20 mph 23 mph 16 - 25 51 94% 1% / 1 4% / 2

SPEED PARAMETERS
Garrow Dr Bet. E Tregallas Rd & Davison Dr
City of Antioch
Northbound Spot Speeds
11:15-12:20
4/9/2021
Project #: 21-080049-031
02468 1 0
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-59
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 25 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 1
18 1
19 3
20 2
21 4
22 6
23 7
24 8
25 9
26 5
27 2
28 1
29 1
30 31
32 33
34 35
36 37
38 39
40 41
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 50 17 - 29 24 mph 26 mph 18 - 27 47 94% 2% / 1 4% / 2

SPEED PARAMETERS
Garrow Dr Bet. E Tregallas Rd & Davison Dr
City of Antioch
Southbound Spot Speeds
11:15-12:20
4/9/2021
Project #: 21-080049-031
02468 1 0
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-60
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28 1
29 2
30 4
31 1
32 3
33 4
34 10
35 23
36 15
37 16
38 17
39 23
40 23
41 20
42 18
43 17
44 15
45 10
46 12
47 5
48 4
49 1
50 2
51 52 3
53 1
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 250 28 - 53 40 mph 45 mph 35 - 44 187 75% 10% / 25 16% / 38

SPEED PARAMETERS
Hillcrest Ave Bet. E 18th St & Sunset Dr
City of Antioch
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
09:00-09:50
4/8/2021
Project #: 21-080049-034
0 5 10 15 20 25
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-61
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30 1
31 32 2
33 1
34 6
35 11
36 7
37 8
38 8
39 10
40 15
41 9
42 7
43 8
44 7
45 4
46 5
47 3
48 1
49 1
50 1
51 52 2
53 1
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 118 30 - 53 40 mph 45 mph 35 - 44 90 76% 8% / 10 16% / 18

SPEED PARAMETERS
Hillcrest Ave Bet. E 18th St & Sunset Dr
City of Antioch
Northbound Spot Speeds
09:00-09:50
4/8/2021
Project #: 21-080049-034
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-62
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28 1
29 2
30 3
31 1
32 1
33 3
34 4
35 12
36 8
37 8
38 9
39 13
40 8
41 11
42 11
43 9
44 8
45 6
46 7
47 2
48 3
49 50 1
51 52 1
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 132 28 - 52 40 mph 45 mph 35 - 44 97 73% 11% / 15 16% / 20

SPEED PARAMETERS
Hillcrest Ave Bet. E 18th St & Sunset Dr
City of Antioch
Southbound Spot Speeds
09:00-09:50
4/8/2021
Project #: 21-080049-034
02468 1 0 1 2 1 4
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-63
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 45 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 1
26 27
28 1
29 2
30 2
31 2
32 8
33 8
34 5
35 9
36 13
37 17
38 17
39 11
40 13
41 10
42 15
43 11
44 16
45 9
46 5
47 11
48 5
49 2
50 4
51 1
52 2
53 1
54 55
56 1
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 202 25 - 56 40 mph 46 mph 35 - 44 132 65% 14% / 29 21% / 41

SPEED PARAMETERS
Hillcrest Ave Bet. Sunset Dr & Davison Dr
City of Antioch
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
13:40-14:40
4/9/2021
Project #: 21-080049-035
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-64
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 45 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 1
26 27
28 29 1
30 1
31 2
32 4
33 2
34 3
35 3
36 6
37 10
38 6
39 5
40 7
41 5
42 7
43 5
44 12
45 3
46 3
47 7
48 3
49 50 1
51 52 1
53 1
54 55
56 1
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 25 - 56 40 mph 46 mph 35 - 44 66 66% 14% / 14 20% / 20

SPEED PARAMETERS
Hillcrest Ave Bet. Sunset Dr & Davison Dr
City of Antioch
Northbound Spot Speeds
13:40-14:40
4/9/2021
Project #: 21-080049-035
02468 1 0 1 2 1 4
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-65
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 45 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28 1
29 1
30 1
31 32 4
33 6
34 2
35 6
36 7
37 7
38 11
39 6
40 6
41 5
42 8
43 6
44 4
45 6
46 2
47 4
48 2
49 2
50 3
51 1
52 1
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 102 28 - 52 39 mph 45 mph 35 - 44 66 65% 14% / 15 21% / 21

SPEED PARAMETERS
Hillcrest Ave Bet. Sunset Dr & Davison Dr
City of Antioch
Southbound Spot Speeds
13:40-14:40
4/9/2021
Project #: 21-080049-035
02468 1 0 1 2
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-66
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 45 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 1
32 5
33 9
34 14
35 12
36 12
37 12
38 12
39 16
40 13
41 15
42 17
43 12
44 13
45 14
46 8
47 6
48 4
49 2
50 3
51 2
52 1
53 4
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 207 31 - 53 40 mph 45 mph 36 - 45 136 66% 19% / 41 15% / 30

SPEED PARAMETERS
Hillcrest Ave Bet. Davison Dr & Lone Tree Way
City of Antioch
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
11:15-11:55
4/8/2021
Project #: 21-080049-036
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-67
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 45 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 1
32 4
33 4
34 8
35 6
36 8
37 7
38 5
39 6
40 6
41 9
42 11
43 7
44 5
45 8
46 4
47 3
48 1
49 50 1
51 1
52 53 2
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 107 31 - 53 40 mph 45 mph 34 - 43 73 68% 8% / 9 24% / 25

SPEED PARAMETERS
Hillcrest Ave Bet. Davison Dr & Lone Tree Way
City of Antioch
Northbound Spot Speeds
11:15-11:55
4/8/2021
Project #: 21-080049-036
02468 1 0 1 2
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-68
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 45 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32 1
33 5
34 6
35 6
36 4
37 5
38 7
39 10
40 7
41 6
42 6
43 5
44 8
45 6
46 4
47 3
48 3
49 2
50 2
51 1
52 1
53 2
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 32 - 53 40 mph 46 mph 35 - 44 64 64% 12% / 12 24% / 24

SPEED PARAMETERS
Hillcrest Ave Bet. Davison Dr & Lone Tree Way
City of Antioch
Southbound Spot Speeds
11:15-11:55
4/8/2021
Project #: 21-080049-036
02468 1 0 1 2
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
D-69
Appendix D
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

Antioch City CouncilJune 14, 2022

Antioch City Council
June 14, 2022