ANNOTATED AGENDA
Antioch City Council
REGULAR MEETING
Date: Tuesday, January 23, 2024
Time: 5:30 P.M. – Closed Session
7:00 P.M. – Regular Meeting
Place: Council Chambers
200 ‘H’ Street
Antioch, CA 94509
City Council meetings are televised live on Comcast channel 24, AT&T U-verse channel 99, or live stream (at www.antiochca.gov). Please see the inside cover for detailed Speaker Rules.
PLEASE TURN OFF CELL PHONES BEFORE ENTERING COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
Lamar Thorpe, Mayor Ellie Householder, City Clerk
Monica E. Wilson, Mayor Pro Tem (District 4) Lauren Posada, City Treasurer Tamisha Torres-Walker, Council Member District 1
Michael Barbanica, Council Member District 2 Kwame P. Reed, Acting City Manager Lori Ogorchock, Council Member District 3 Thomas Lloyd Smith, City Attorney
ACCESSIBILITY: In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and California law, it is the policy of the City of Antioch to offer its public programs, services and meetings in a manner that is readily accessible to everyone, including individuals with disabiliti es. If you are a person with a disability and require information or materials in an appropriate alternative format; or if you require any other accommodation, please contact the ADA Coordinator at the number or address below at least 72 hours prior to the meeting or when you desire to receive services. Advance notification within this guideline will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. The City’s ADA Coordinator can be reached @ Phone: (925) 779-6950, and e-mail: [email protected].
ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL -1- JANUARY 23, 2024
Notice of Availability of Reports
This agenda is a summary of the actions proposed to be taken by the City Council. For almost every agenda item, materials have been prepared by the City staff for the Council's consideration. These materials include staff reports which explain in detail the item before the Council and the reason for the recommendation. The materials may also include resolutions or ordinances which are proposed to be adopted. Unless otherwise noted, City Council actions include a determination that the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply. The Council meets regularly on the second and fourth Tuesdays of the month at 7:00 p.m., with Closed Sessions often occurring before or after the regular meeting. City Council Agendas, including Staff Reports are posted onto our City’s Website 72 hours before each Council Meeting. To be notified when the agenda packets are posted onto our City’s Website, simply click on this link: Notifications – City of Antioch, California (antiochca.gov) and enter your e-mail address to subscribe. To view the agenda information, click on the following link: City Council – City of Antioch, California (antiochca.gov) . Questions may be directed to the staff member who prepared the staff report, or to the City Clerk's Office, who will refer you to the appropriate person.
Notice of Opportunity to Address Council
The public has the opportunity to address the City Council on each agenda item. To address the Council, fill out a Speaker Request form and place in the Speaker Card Tray near the City Clerk before the meeting begins. This will enable us to call upon you to speak. Comments regarding matters not on this Agenda may be addressed during the "Public Comments" section. No one may speak more than once on an agenda item or during “Public Comments”. The Speaker Request forms are located at the entrance of the Council Chambers. Please see the Speaker Rules on the inside cover of this Agenda.
5:30 P.M. ROLL CALL – CLOSED SESSION – for Council Members – All Present
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
PUBLIC COMMENTS for Closed Session – None
CLOSED SESSION:
1) CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – Existing Litigation pursuant to California Government Code section 54956.9; Frank Sterling v. City of Antioch, et al. United States District Court Northern District of California Case No. 3:22- cv-07558-TSH.
Council approved a case settlement in the amount of $150,000, 4/1 (Barbanica)
2) CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION – Initiation of litigation pursuant to California Government Code section 54956.9(c): Nine Cases.
Direction provided to City Attorney
3) CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATONS pursuant to California Government Code section 54956.8; Property: 275 W. Tregallas Road, Antioch, CA ; Agency Negotiation: City of Antioch Negotiators: Kwame P. Reed, Acting City Manager and Thomas Lloyd Smith, City Attorney; Negotiating Parties: Richard Hobin, Esq.; Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment.
Direction provided to City Attorney and Acting City Manager
ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL -2- JANUARY 23, 2024
CLOSED SESSION – Continued
4) CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATIONS – pursuant to California Government Code section 54956.8; Property: Approximately 2,540 square feet of property adjacent to 1 Marine Plaza (APN 066 -010-017), Antioch, CA; Negotiating Parties: City of Antioch Negotiators: Kwame P.
Reed, Acting City Manager and Thomas Lloyd Smith, City Attorney; Negotiating Parties: Sean McCauley, Owner of Adjacent Property; Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment.
Direction provided to City Attorney and Acting City Manager
5:32 P.M. MOTIONED TO ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION
7:05 P.M. ROLL CALL – REGULAR MEETING – for Council Members – All Present
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
CITY ATTORNEY TO REPORT OUT ON CLOSED SESSION
1. INTRODUCTION OF NEW CITY EMPLOYEES
2. PROCLAMATIONS
• Proclamation Recognizing Human Trafficking Prevention Month, January 2024 • In Honor of Black History Month, February 2024
• Celebrating Thomas Gaines Day in Antioch, February 9, 2024 Approved, 5/0
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council approve the proclamations.
3. ANNOUNCEMENTS OF CIVIC AND COMMUNITY EVENTS
➢ JOIN THE ANTIOCH COUNCIL OF TEENS – The ‘Youth Voice’ for the City of Antioch
▪ Make a difference and represent your City – Visit us at: antiochca.gov/act For more information, email: [email protected]
➢ ANTIOCH RIVERTOWN COMMUNITY SPACE – Community Design Workshops
▪ Antioch Community Center – February 8, 2024
4703 Lone Tree Way, Antioch, CA
▪ Nick Rodriguez Community Center – February 18, 2024
213 F Street, Antioch, CA
ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL -3- JANUARY 23, 2024
PUBLIC COMMENTS – Members of the public may comment only on unagendized items.
The public may comment on agendized items when they come up on this Agenda.
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS/COMMUNICATIONS
MAYOR’S COMMENTS
4. PRESENTATIONS – Friends of the Library, presented by Walter Ruehlig
– Antioch Police Department – Community Services Officer presented by Lieutenant Desmond Bittner
– 2024 Election Cycle Presentation, presented by Kristin B. Connelly, Contra Costa County Clerk-Recorder-Registrar
5. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 12, 2023 Approved, 5/0
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council approve the Meeting Minutes.
B. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JANUARY 9, 2024 Approved, 5/0
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council approve the Meeting Minutes.
C. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL WARRANTS
Approved, 5/0
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council approve the warrants.
D. ACCEPTANCE OF WORK AND NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE CURB, GUTTER,
AND SIDEWALK REPAIR INCLUDING TREE REMOVAL AND STUMP GRINDING AND
INSTALLATION OF CONCRETE CURB RAMPS AT MISCELLANEOUS LOCATIONS 2022/23 (P.W. 507-19)
Reso No. 2024/07 adopted, 5/0
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution determining that work has been completed, accepting the work, and authorizing the Acting City Manager or designee to file a Notice of Completion for the Curb, Gutter, and Sidewalk Repair Including Tree Removal and Stump Grinding and
Installation of Concrete Curb Ramps at Miscellaneous Locations 2022/23 Project.
ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL -4- JANUARY 23, 2024
PUBLIC HEARING
6. VINEYARD CROSSING PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PRE2023-003) Feedback given to applicant and staff
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council provide feedback to the applicant and City staff regarding the proposal and provide direction to the applicant for the Final Development Plan submittal.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS – Council Members report out various activities and any Council Member may place an item for discussion and direction on a future agenda. Timing determined by Mayor and Acting City Manager – no longer than 90 days.
MOTION TO ADJOURN – After Council Communications and Future Agenda Items, the Mayor will make a motion to adjourn the meeting. A second motion is required, and then a majority vote is required to adjourn the meeting.
Motioned to adjourn meeting at 10:26 p.m., 5/0
CITY OF
ANTIOCH
CALIFORNIA
INTRODUCTION OF NEW CITY EMPLOYEES
DATE: Regular Meeting of January 23, 2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
SUBMITTED BY: Ana Cortez, Human Resources Director®
► Acting Public Works Director/City Engineer Scott Buenting would like to introduce:
- Stephen Hopkins, Water Distribution Operator I
--------------------------- ------------------- ------------------------------ ► Acting Police Chief Joe Vigil would like to introduce:
- Alma Rodriguez, Police Records Technician
----------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Agenda#
2.01 01-23-24
PROCLAMATION RECOGNIZING
HUMAN TRAFFICKING PREVENTION MONTH
JANUARY 2024
WHEREAS, human trafficking is a form of interpersonal violence and a crime in which force, fraud or coercion is used to compel victims into commercial sexual and labor exploitation, affecting individuals of all genders, citizenship status, ages and backgrounds;
WHEREAS, human trafficking can happen to anyone, certain populations are disproportionately at risk, including people affected by prior abuse or sexual violence, poverty, and unstable living situations or homelessness, as well as those systemically marginalized and underserved;
WHEREAS, human trafficking remains underreported, in 2021, the National Human Trafficking Resource Center identified 10,360 cases of human trafficking nationwide, with California leading all other states, accounting for nearly 13% of all such cases;
WHEREAS, human trafficking requires a coordinated, community-wide response engaging diverse stakeholders including survivors, advocates, prosecutors, case managers, civil legal attorneys, police officers, educators, social workers, community-based organizations, community members, and governmental agencies, among others;
WHEREAS, the Contra Costa Human Trafficking Task Force, in partnership with 40 multidisciplinary partners, strive to identify and provide services to survivors, investigate and prosecute all forms of human trafficking, and build capacity within the Task Force and community to respond to and prevent human trafficking;
WHEREAS, in 2023, Community Violence Solutions, along with Love Never Fails, The Family Justice Center and others provided comprehensive, trauma-informed services to 132 victims of human trafficking.
This included crisis intervention, on-going case management, medical and legal accompaniment, personal and criminal justice advocacy, emergency housing and rental assistance, and linkages to resources; and
WHEREAS, in Contra Costa Alliance to End Abuse recognizes human trafficking as a public health issue that is preventable by building individual, community, and societal understanding and resilience, eliminating social and historical inequities, and improving the environmental conditions where people are born, learn, live, work, play, age, and worship.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, LAMAR A. THORPE, Mayor of the City of Antioch, hereby proclaim January 2024 as Human Trafficking Prevention Month and urge all residents to actively participate in the efforts to both raise awareness and prevent all forms of human trafficking.
Let us make it known that human trafficking has no place in this city, this county, this nation, or this world.
JANUARY 23, 2024
_______________________
LAMAR A. THORPE, Mayor
2.02 01-23-24
IN HONOR OF
BLACK HISTORY MONTH
FEBRUARY 2024
WHEREAS, the origins of Black History Month can be traced back to 1915, half a century after the Thirteenth Amendment abolished slavery in the United States;
WHEREAS, in 1976, Black History Month was formally adopted to honor and affirm the importance of Black History throughout our American experience, and is full of Individuals who took a stance against prejudice, advanced the cause of civil rights, strengthened families, communities, and our nation;
WHEREAS, African Americans have played a significant role in the history of our nation and California’s economic, cultural, spiritual, and political development while working tirelessly to promote their culture and history;
WHEREAS, as a result of their determination, hard work, and perseverance, African Americans have made valuable and lasting contributions to our community and our state, achieving exceptional success in all aspects of society including business, education, politics, science, and the arts;
WHEREAS, the City of Antioch continues to work toward becoming an inclusive community in which all residents – past, present, and future – are respected and recognized for their contributions and potential contributions to our community, the state, the country, and the world; and
WHEREAS, the City of Antioch is proud to honor the history and contributions of African Americans in our community, throughout our state, and nation.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, LAMAR A. THORPE, Mayor of the City of Antioch, hereby proclaim February 2024 to be “Black History Month.” I encourage all citizens to celebrate our diverse heritage and culture and to continue our efforts to create a world that is more just, peaceful, and prosperous for all.
JANUARY 23, 2024
___________________________
LAMAR A. THORPE, Mayor
2.03 01-23-24
CELEBRATING THOMAS GAINES DAY IN ANTIOCH
FEBRUARY 9, 2024
WHEREAS, since the beginning of Antioch in the 1800’s, our community has become home for new residents from around the world;
WHEREAS, in the 1860’s, an emancipated slave named Thomas Gaines came to Antioch and worked as a laborer on the Antioch docks;
WHEREAS, Thomas Gaines was the only African American resident of Antioch between 1860 and the 1940’s;
WHEREAS, he lived in a red brick shack on the waterfront in the back of the Antioch Lumber Company;
WHEREAS, on February 28, 1875, Thomas Gaines became a member of the First Congregational Church by profession of faith;
WHEREAS, Thomas Gaines was highly regarded around town for his noble work and his caring attention towards others – he regularly walked women and children home from church for safety; and
WHEREAS, today Antioch celebrates a rich cultural heritage and inspiring diversity, and collaborates with several community partners to recognize Black History Month in February with special events and impressive exhibits.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, LAMAR A. THORPE, Mayor of the City of Antioch, hereby proclaim February 9, 2024, as “THOMAS GAINES DAY” during Black History Month and the Black History Month Exhibit Days. I encourage all citizens, schools, and organizations to learn more about Antioch’s cultural history, Black History Month, and Thomas Gaines, the first African American resident of the City of Antioch.
JANUARY 23, 2024
_______________________
LAMAR A. THORPE, Mayor
Meetin9s
on the
2ND And 'fTH
WEDNESDAYS
FREE
FOOD AND
DRINKS
For more informAtion contAct:
[email protected]
'
Open to
6th-12th
9taclets
V;s;t US Gt:
1"tiochcA. /act
#3
COMMUNITY
DESIGN
WORKSHOP
FOR MORE INFORMATION:
www.antiochca.gov/recreation/rcs
Please take
a moment
to fill out this
short survey
Share your
thoughts now
COMMUNITY
DESIGN
WORKSHOP
Join the discussion and share
your thoughts on a new outdoor
community space in historic
Rivertown!
Open to all community
members!
Thursday Feb. 8, 2024
6:00pm - 8:00pm
Sunday Feb. 18, 2024
4:00pm - 6:00pm
Help us design
through fun activities
and discussions!
*Refreshments will be provided
ANTIOCH COMMUNITY CENTER
NICK RODRIGUEZ CMTY CENTER
OR
4703 Lone Tree Wy, Antioch, CA
213 F Street, Antioch, CA
ANTIOCH RIVERTOWN
COMMUNITY SPACE
ANTIOCH RIVERTOWN
COMMUNITY SPACE
HELP DESIGN THIS
OUTDOOR SPACE!
W 3rd St.
W 2nd St.
E St.
Contra Costa County
Kristin B. Connelly
C l e r k - R e c o r d e r - E l e c t i o n s
County Clerk-Recorder-Registrar
[email protected]
925.335.7899
#4
ELECTIONS
Registrar of Voters
Primary Statutory Responsibilities Include:
• Conduct elections in a fair, efficient, accurate, and timely manner; • Provide services to maintain a high level of voter registration and to ensure that all eligible citizens can register to vote and are able to exercise their right to vote, according to Federal and State statutory laws and regulations;
CLERK-RECORDER
Primary Statutory
Responsibilities Include:
• Accurately maintain, protect, and
preserve official records and indices
relating to real property and
vital records in Contra Costa County
and provide the public with easy,
convenient, and reliable access to
public documents;
• Provide micrographic capability and
equipment to digitize, maintain, and
archive our public records.
CLERK -RECORDER -
ELECTIONS DEPARTMENT
• The Election Division was
selected as 1 of just 16 jurisdictions
nationwide to be a Center for Election
Excellence.
o The award is bringing nearly $2 million
in grant revenue through the end of 2024.
• Contra Costa Elections also received the
Democracy Award from the National
Association of Election Officials in 2022 for leading
the 11-county Coalition of Bay Area Elections
Officials (bayareavotes.org) for collaborating
to fight mis- and dis-information about elections
in our shared media market.
Recognized for Excellence
CONTRA COSTA ELECTIONS
BY THE NUMBERS
• 704,567 registered voters
o 90%-95% of ballots are cast as
Vote-By-Mail (VBM) ballots.
o These get returned split about evenly between
secure drop boxes and USPS.
• We moved to a central count model in 2022.
• We are authorized for just 32 permanent FTEs.
• By contrast, Santa Clara has only 400,000 more
registered voters and they have 90 permanent FTEs.
• The Presidential Primary on March 5, 2024, is first time in the history of California where we will mail every voter a ballot in a partisan presidential primary.
9th Largest County in California
ANTIOCH
BY THE NUMBERS
• 64,041 registered voters (9.1% of county)
o 61 precincts serving city voters
• Partisan breakdown of registered voters:
o 55.6% Democratic Party
o 16.1% Republican Party
o 4.2% American Independent Party
o 0.4% Green Party
o 0.9% Libertarian Party
o 0.8% Peace & Freedom Party
o 21.3% No Party Preference
o 0.8% Misc.
• 47 volunteers from Antioch have committed to
help with the Presidential Primary.
• In November 2022, the highest turnout for in-person voting was at Rio Grande Chapel with 474 voters
on Election Day.
Contra Costa County Elections Division
mailed all NPP voters a postcard last month
that gave instructions on how to request a cross-
over ballot for American Independent Party, the
Democratic Party or the Libertarian Party.
Voters wanting to participate in the Republican,
Green Party or Peace & Freedom Party
Presidential Primary need to re-register with that
party by February 20,2024.
How to get back to us?
Voters can send us their No Party Preference Cross-
Over Ballot Notice and Application in person or by
mail. It can also be sent by email or fax.
• Email: [email protected]
• Fax: (925) 335-7836
When is the Next Election?
2024 Presidential Primary Election
E-Day -40
1/25/24
E-Day -29
2/5/24
E-Day -15
2/19/24
E-Day -4
3/1/24
E-Day
3/5/24
E-Day +7
3/12/24
Voter Information Guides mailed
Includes locations of ballot drop boxes and voting sites Ballots mailed to all voters
In-person voting begins in Martinez; drop boxes opened
Last day to register online-If haven’t received your ballot Email [email protected] or phone 925.335.7800
Five early voting sites open
Fri, Sat, Mon, and Election Day
Election Day!
Ballot postmark deadline
Drop-dead
County must receive your ballot
How Can You Support Elections?
• Communicate with your residents and reinforce important election information.
• For the March Primary, NPP voters need to let us know if they would like a “crossover ballot” that allows them to vote in a partisan primary.
• To participate in the Republican Primary, a resident needs to be registered with the Republican party.
• Encourage high school students to become student poll workers.
How Can You Support Elections?
• Be an ambassador for registering new voters year-round. • Support California High School Voter Education Weeks the last two weeks of April and September.
• In 2024, please do what you can to amplify information about the importance of voting. The CA SOS, Dr. Shirley Weber plans to highlight the 60th anniversary of Fannie Lou Hamer’s 1964 speech “I’m so sick and tired of being sick and tired,” to help inspire Californians to vote. • Check out our Website and follow us on Social Media:
ContraCostaVote.gov
We’re Easy to Reach!
Follow us on:
Instagram TikTok
QR Code to our Instagram
Social Media:
Twitter – @cocoelections
YouTube – Contra Costa Clerk Recorder
Facebook – Contra Costa County Elections
Instagram – @contra_costa_elections
Tik Tok – @cc.clerkrec.elect
QR Code to our TikTok
California's Youth Vote
State
2014 Youth Turnout
Rate
2018 Youth Turnout
Rate
2022 Youth Turnout
Rate
Change in Youth
Turnout, 2018-2022
California 10.3% 30.3% 22.1% -8.2
Youth Voter Turnout in Recent Midterm Elections: State by State CIRCLE estimates of youth voter turnout (ages 18-29) in the past three midterm elections. Turnout is the percentage of eligible voters (whether or not they were registered) who cast a ballot.
Five
Steps to
Safer
Elections
f r o m t h e
C o m m i t t e e f o r
S a f e a n d S e c u r e
E l e c t i o n s
Contra Costa County
Kristin B. Connelly
C l e r k - R e c o r d e r - E l e c t i o n s
County Clerk-Recorder-Registrar
[email protected]
925.335.7899
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
INCLUDING THE ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL
ACTING AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY/HOUSING SUCCESSOR
TO THE ANTIOCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Regular Meeting December 12, 2023
7:00 P.M. Council Chambers
6:00 P.M. - CLOSED SESSION
Mayor Thorpe called the Closed Session to order at 6:01 P.M., and City Clerk Householder called the roll.
Present: Council/Agency Members District 2 Barbanica, District 3 Ogorchock, District 4 Wilson and Mayor Thorpe
Absent: Mayor Pro Tem (District 1) Torres-Walker
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Thorpe led the Pledge of Allegiance.
1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION – Initiation of litigation pursuant to California Government Code section 54956.9(d)(2): One Case.
2. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATIONS – pursuant to California Government Code section 54956.8; Property: 800 W. 2nd Street, Antioch, CA; Negotiating Parties: City of Antioch Negotiators: Brad Helfenberger, Acting Assistant City Manager and Thomas Lloyd Smith, City Attorney; Negotiating Parties: Chris Burns, Broker/Owner Representative; Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment.
3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION – pursuant to California Government Code section 54956.9(d)(1): Lasopada, Juan and Rebecca Rodriguez v. City of Antioch, et al., United States District Court, Northern District California, San Francisco 3:23-cv-01955-JSC.
PUBLIC COMMENTS – None
ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION
Mayor Thorpe adjourned to Closed Session at 6:02 P.M.
7:00 P.M. REGULAR MEETING
Mayor Thorpe called the meeting to order at 7:0 3 P.M., and City Clerk Householder called the roll.
A
01-23-24
ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL
SUCCESSOR AGENCY/HOUSING SUCCESSOR
Regular Meeting
December 12, 2023 Page 2 of 7
Present: Council/Agency Members District 2 Barbanica, District 3 Ogorchock, District 4 Wilson and Mayor Thorpe
Absent: Mayor Pro Tem (District 1) Torres-Walker
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Thorpe led the Pledge of Allegiance.
CITY ATTORNEY TO REPORT OUT ON CLOSED SESSION
City Attorney Smith reported the City Council had been in Closed Session and gave the following report: #1 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION, direction given to City Attorney, #2 CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATIONS, direction given to Acting Assistant City Manager and City Attorney; and #3 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION, no reportable action.
1. INTRODUCTION OF NEW CITY EMPLOYEES
Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer Buenting introduced Ricardo Cruz, Public Works Inspector and Joey Hawkins, Water Distribution Operator.
Director of Human Resources Cortez introduced Olga “Karina” Moreno -Coria, Human Resources Technician.
Mayor Thorpe welcomed the new city employees.
2. ANNOUNCEMENTS OF BOARD AND COMMISSION OPENINGS
City Clerk Householder announced the following Board and Commission openings.
➢ Planning Commission
➢ Sales Tax Citizens’ Oversight Committee
For more information and to apply, visit the City’s website.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
Members of Antioch Council of Teens (ACT) announced the following civic and community events:
➢ ACT meetings – every 2nd and 4th Wednesdays from 4:30 P.M. – 6:00 P.M. ➢ ACT Teen Bowling Night - January 12, 2024, at 6:00 P.M. – 8:00 P.M. at Delta Bowl
Mayor Thorpe invited youth to apply for the City’s Board and Commission vacancies.
ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL
SUCCESSOR AGENCY/HOUSING SUCCESSOR
Regular Meeting
December 12, 2023 Page 3 of 7
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Devin Williams , Katherine Walle y, ACCE, Kamilah Miller, Judith Ortiz, Monument Impact, Tachina Garrett, ACCE, Lester Geoffrey, Monument Impact, and Nicole A rrington, ACCE, requested Council bring forward a Just Cause for Evictions Ordinance as soon as possible.
Leslie May discussed the negative impacts of social media posts on children and encouraged people to be cognizant of comments made in the presence of youth. She thanked Council for their leadership.
Lynette Hart, Antioch resident, reported she recently became a victim of racism in Antioch which was reported to the Antioch Police Department.
Andrew Becker discussed a conversation he had with an Antioch resident who had recently been served an eviction notice and reported that they were seeking resources.
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS/COMMUNICATIONS
Councilmember Wilson announced Delta Diablo and Tri Delta Transit meetings would be held on December 13, 2024.
MAYOR’S COMMENTS
Mayor Thorpe announced he was working with staff to develop a timeline for the Just Cause for Evictions Ordinance and explained various factors dictated the workflow of the City. He sympathized with a previous public speaker and commented that everyone was welcome in Antioch. He thanked everyone who wore their ugly Christmas sweaters to the meeting.
3. PRESENTATIONS
Director of Public Safety and Community Resources Johnson introduced Trish Callow, Studio Instructor AFSF / Architectural Foundation of San Francisco who on behalf of the 2023 BuildAntioch Design Internship Program Team presented Project 2023.
Leslie May questioned if this item was related to a meeting for a youth center.
Mayor Thorpe responded that this item was not related to a youth center; however, Director of Public Safety and Community Resources Johnson would supply Ms. May with information on that program.
Gary Parkhurst, MDIA Campaign Committee presented the Mount Diablo Interpretive Association (MDIA). Mitchell Canyon Educational Center Project.
In response to Councilmember Barbanica, Mr. Parkhurst discussed their fundraising efforts.
ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL
SUCCESSOR AGENCY/HOUSING SUCCESSOR
Regular Meeting
December 12, 2023 Page 4 of 7
Councilmember Ogorchock spoke in support of the project and encouraged staff to share the information with the public.
Mayor Thorpe directed staff to bring forward a resolution in support of the project.
4. CONSENT CALENDAR for City /City Council Members acting as Successor Agency/Housing Successor to the Antioch Development Agency
A. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR OCTOBER 24, 2023
B. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 14, 2023
C. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 28, 2023
D. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL WARRANTS
E. APPROVAL OF HOUSING SUCCESSOR WARRANTS
F. REJECTION OF CLAIM: FINDELL MARIE RAY
G. SA RESOLUTION NO. 2023/41 RECOGNIZED OBLIGATION PAYMENT SCHEDULE (2024-25) FOR THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE ANTIOCH DEVELOPMENT
AGENCY OF THE CITY OF ANTIOCH
H. RESOLUTION NO. 2023/ 176 FIRST AMENDMENT TO CSI METRICS, LLC
CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR THE WATER TREATMENT PLANT INFORMATION AND CONTROL SYSTEMS ASSISTANCE (P.W. 246-32)
I. RESOLUTION NO. 2023/ 177 SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE CONSULTING
SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BELLECCI & ASSOCIATES FOR ON -CALL LAND SURVEYING SERVICES (P.W. 700-2)
J. RESOLUTION NO. 2023/ 178 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE DESIGN CONSULTING
SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BELLECCI & ASSOCIATES FOR ON-CALL DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES (P.W. 700-1)
K. RESOLUTION NO. 2023/179 FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WITH THE GUALCO GROUP, INC.
L. RESOLUTION NO. 2023/ 180, RESOLUTION NO. 2023/ 181, RESOLUTION NO. 2023/182, RESOLUTION NO. 2023/183, RESOLUTION NO. 2023/184, RESOLUTION NO. 2023/ 185, RESOLUTION NO. 2023/ 186, RESOLUTION NO. 2023/ 187 AND RESOLUTION NO. 2023/188 APPROVAL OF AWARDS FOR THE SMALL BUSINESS
RESOURCES PROVIDERS FOR BUSINESS EXPANSION TRAINING, TECHNICAL
ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL
SUCCESSOR AGENCY/HOUSING SUCCESSOR
Regular Meeting
December 12, 2023 Page 5 of 7
ASSISTANCE, AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP TRAINING NOT TO EXCEED $1,500,000
IN AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT FUNDING
M. RESOLUTION NO. 2023/ 189 RENAMING THE CLASS SPECIFICATION ENTITLED “ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN II” TO “ACCOUNTING SPECIALIST II”
On motion by Councilmember Ogorchock, seconded by Councilmember Wilson, the City Council members present unanimously approved the Council Consent Calendar.
PUBLIC HEARING
5. CITY OF ANTIOCH ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ELEMENT
Acting Planning Manager Merideth introduced Carla Violet and Curtis Banks Urban Planning Partners who presented the staff report dated December 12, 2023, recommending the City Council adopted the resolution amending the General Plan to include the Environmental Justice (“EJ”) Element.
Mayor Thorpe opened the public hearing.
Andrew Becker reviewed various census tracks in Antioch and the Justice40 Initiative. He questioned why the City had not sought grant funding opportunities for affordable housing. He suggested a study session be held for the Environmental Justice Element.
Mayor Thorpe closed the public hearing.
A motion was made by Councilmember Ogorchock and seconded by Councilmember Wilson to adopt the resolution amending the General Plan to include the Environmental Justice (“EJ”) Element.
Mayor Thorpe reported that he had asked staff to bring this item forward as a study session since it required more understanding and education.
Acting Director of Community Development Scudero explained that his preference would be to approve the EJ Element this evening so the City would become compliant with the state and then staff could put their efforts towards the comprehensive General Plan update.
Mayor Thorpe suggested an Ad Hoc Committee be associated with the General Plan update process.
Acting Director of Community Development Scudero responded that there would be robust community outreach and engagement with Council for the General Plan update.
RESOLUTION NO. 2023/190
ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL
SUCCESSOR AGENCY/HOUSING SUCCESSOR
Regular Meeting
December 12, 2023 Page 6 of 7
A vote taken on the previous motion to adopt the resolution was unanimously passed by the City Councilmembers present.
COUNCIL REGULAR AGENDA
6. BOARD OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS APPOINTMENT FOR ONE ALTERNATE BOARD MEMBER VACANCY, TWO-YEAR TERM, EXPIRING DECEMBER 2025
City Clerk Householder announced Mayor Thorpe had nominated Jacquelyn Higgins to the Board of Administrative Appeals for the Alternate Board Member Vacancy, two -year term, expiring December 2025 and read her biography.
RESOLUTION NO. 2023/191
On motion by Councilmember Barbanica , seconded by Councilmember Ogorchock the City Council members present unanimously adopted a resolution approving the Mayor’s appointment of Jacquelyn Higgins to the Board of Administrative Appeals for the Alternate Board Member Vacancy, two-year term, expiring December 2025.
City Clerk Householder administered the Oath of Office to Jacquelyn Higgins.
7. RESOLUTION FOR AN EXCEPTION TO THE 180 -DAY WAIT PERIOD FOR POST -
RETIREMENT EMPLOYMENT
Director of Human Resources Cortez presented the staff report dated December 12, 2023, recommending the City Council adopt a resolution for an exception to the 180 -day wait period for post -retirement employment regarding a Police Dispatcher position with the Police Department.
RESOLUTION NO. 2023/192
On motion by Councilmember Barbanica , seconded by Councilmember Ogorchock , the City Council unanimously adopted a resolution for an exception to the 180 -day wait period for post- retirement employment regarding a Police Dispatcher position with the Police Department.
8. SELECTION OF MAYOR PRO TEMPORE
City Attorney Smith presented the staff report dated December 12, 2023, recommending the City Council select the mayor pro tempore.
On motion by Councilmember Barbanica, seconded by Mayor Thorpe, the City Council members present unanimously appointed Councilmember Wilson as Mayor Pro Tem.
PUBLIC COMMENT – None
ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL
SUCCESSOR AGENCY/HOUSING SUCCESSOR
Regular Meeting
December 12, 2023 Page 7 of 7
STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
Acting Assistant City Manager Helfenberger announced the Mayor’s Conference w as rescheduled for January 11 , 2023, and the second Council meeting in December had been canceled. On behalf of staff, he wished everyone a Merry Christmas, Happy Holiday and Happy New Year.
City Attorney Smith wished everyone a M erry Christmas and thanked Mayor Thorpe for encouraging Council and staff to wear ugly Christmas sweaters.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Councilmember Barbanica wished everyone a M erry Christmas and Happy New Year . He thanked Council and staff. On behalf of Councilmember Torres -Walker, he wished everyone a Happy Holiday and Happy New Year.
Councilmember Ogorchock requested staff bring forward a discussion on an ordinance for security around private schools. She wished everyone a Merry Christmas and Happy New Year.
Councilmember Wilson wished everyone a H appy Holiday and stated she looked forward to positive and constructive changes in 2024.
Mayor Thorpe thanked and wished everyone a Merry Christmas and Happy New Year.
ADJOURNMENT
On motion by Councilmember Ogorchock, seconded by Councilmember Wilson, the City Council members present unanimously adjourned the meeting at 9:01 P.M.
Respectfully submitted:
Kitty Eiden
KITTY EIDEN, Minutes Clerk
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
INCLUDING THE ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL
ACTING AS HOUSING SUCCESSOR
TO THE ANTIOCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Special/Regular Meeting January 9, 2024
7:00 P.M. Council Chambers
5:30 P.M. – SPECIAL MEETING
Mayor Thorpe called the Special Meeting to order at 5:30 P.M., and Acting City Clerk Garcia called the roll.
Present: Council/Agency Members District 1 Torres-Walker, District 2 Barbanica, District 3 Ogorchock, Mayor Pro Tem (District 4) Wilson and Mayor Thorpe
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Thorpe led the Pledge of Allegiance.
SM-1. DISCUSSION ITEM: TOOLS FOR ADDRESSING SUBSTANDARD
PROPERTIES
City Attorney Smith introduced Charisse L. Smith, Outside Legal Counsel , who gave a PowerPoint Presentation of Tools for Addressing Substandard Properties , recommending the City Council discuss, receive public comments, and provide direction to staff.
Andrew Becker discussed blighted commercial properties and economic conditions that prevented tenants and owners from bringing their properties into compliance.
Leslie May expressed concern for blighted commercial properties and questioned if there was a difference in receivership and imminent domain . She also questioned if non -profits would get preference into acquiring properties. She suggested Council consider the impacts of health and safety violations.
Mayor Thorpe explained the goal of this i nformational workshop was to consider older blighted commercial properties. He clarified that there was a difference in receivership and eminent domain and eminent domain would be discussed at a future meeting.
Councilmember Ogorchock reported she received a call from a citizen who suggested the City consider building senior housing at Buchanan Rd. and Delta Fair Blvd. She questioned if the City could exercise eminent domain on certain properties.
Mayor Thorpe stated Council would be discussing the Buchanan Rd. and Delta Fair Blvd. property in Closed Session and the city’s focus would be commercial properties.
B
01-23-24
ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL
HOUSING SUCCESSOR
Special/Regular Meeting
January 9, 2024 Page 2 of 7
Ms. Smith clarified that receivership could be used for commercial properties when utilized as housing.
MOTION TO ADJOURN SPECIAL MEETING/WORK SESSION
On motion by Councilmember Ogorchock, seconded by Councilmember Wilson, the City Council unanimously adjourned the Special Meeting/Work Session at 6:06 P.M.
6:00 P.M. - CLOSED SESSION
Mayor Thorpe called the Closed Session to order at 6:07 P.M., and Acting City Clerk Garcia called the roll.
Present: Council/Agency Members District 1 Torres-Walker, District 2 Barbanica, District 3 Ogorchock, Mayor Pro Tem (District 4) Wilson and Mayor Thorpe
1. PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT – RECRUITMENT OF CITY MANAGER. This closed session is authorized pursuant to California Government Code section 54957(b).
2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION – Initiation of litigation pursuant to California Government Code section 54956.9(c): Nine Cases.
PUBLIC COMMENTS – None
ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION
Mayor Thorpe adjourned to Closed Session at 6:08 P.M.
7:00 P.M. REGULAR MEETING
Mayor Thorpe called the meeting to order at 7: 11 P.M., and City Clerk Householder called the roll.
Present: Council/Agency Members District 1 Torres-Walker, District 2 Barbanica, District 3 Ogorchock, Mayor Pro Tem (District 4) Wilson and Mayor Thorpe
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Thorpe led the Pledge of Allegiance.
CITY ATTORNEY TO REPORT OUT ON CLOSED SESSION
City Attorney Smith reported the City Council had been in Closed Session and gave the following report: #1 PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT – RECRUITMENT OF CITY MANAGER, gave direction to
ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL
HOUSING SUCCESSOR
Special/Regular Meeting
January 9, 2024 Page 3 of 7
City Attorney and Director of Human Resources ; and, #2 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION, gave direction to City Attorney.
1. ANNOUNCEMENTS OF CIVIC AND COMMUNITY EVENTS
Acting Assistant City Manager Helfenberger announced the following civic and community event:
➢ Martin Luther King Jr. Day of Service – January 15, 2024
Erika Raulston announced the following civic and community event:
➢ African American Holistic Wellness Hub Steering Committee Meeting – February 12, 2024
Michelle Kuslits on behalf of Barbara Sobalvarro and Antioch Friends of Animal Services announced the following civic and community event:
➢ Antioch Animal Shelter Reduced Adoption Fees for January 2024
Gavin Payton representing the Youth NAACP thanked Council for attending their event and announced the following civic and community events:
➢ MLK Breakfast on January 15, 2024
➢ Know Your Rights Community Forum
2. ANNOUNCEMENTS OF BOARD AND COMMISSION OPENINGS
City Clerk Householder announced the following Board and Commission openings.
➢ Sales Tax Citizens’ Oversight Committee
For more information and to apply, visit the City’s website.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
David Amezcua expressed concern regarding the prolonged timeframe for placing the Just Cause for Eviction Ordinance on the agenda.
Leslie May discussed the need for improving streetlights in downtown Antioch. She expressed concern that she was unable to contact a Councilmember when she had an issue in his district.
She encouraged Councilmembers to be more approachable and look forward to change.
Stacey Wright, Antioch resident, expressed concern regarding traffic issues in her neighborhood and requested the City address these matters.
ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL
HOUSING SUCCESSOR
Special/Regular Meeting
January 9, 2024 Page 4 of 7
Leidy Gomes reported that her family had been negatively impacted by pollution in her neighborhood.
Andrew Becker discussed an interaction he had with a community member who was having financial difficulties.
Public comments submitted in writing were entered into the record from the following individuals:
Tesa Camus, Irma Chavez, Jackie Byrne and Anonymous Citizens.
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS/COMMUNICATIONS
Councilmember Torres-Walker wished everyone a Happy New Year. She reported on meetings she attended with several staff members and philanthropic partners . She discussed a conversation she had with her granddaughter and encouraged everyone to work collaboratively.
Councilmember Barbanica provided contact information and encouraged residents to call or text him so he could respond to their concerns.
Councilmember Wilson wished everyone a H appy Holiday and announced she would be attending the Delta Diablo meeting on January 10, 2024. She reported on a conversation she had had with Acting Chief Vigil regarding recent sideshow activities.
MAYOR’S COMMENTS
Mayor Thorpe wished everyone a Hap py New Year and stated he was excited to get back to work. He announced he would be attending Tri Delta Transit, CCTA and the U.S. Conference of Mayors this month.
3. PRESENTATION
Friends of the Library, presented by Walter Ruehlig
Mr. Ruehlig was not present at the meeting and the presentation was not received.
4. CONSENT CALENDAR for City /City Council Members acting as Housing Successor to the Antioch Development Agency
A. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 28, 2023
B. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 12, 2023
C. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL WARRANTS
D. APPROVAL OF HOUSING SUCCESSOR WARRANTS
ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL
HOUSING SUCCESSOR
Special/Regular Meeting
January 9, 2024 Page 5 of 7
E. RESOLUTION NO. 2024/01 LEASE AGREEMENT FOR REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1915 D STREET (APN 067-264-009)
F. RESOLUTION NO. 2024/0 2 OF SUPPORT FOR A TRANSPORTATION
DEVELOPMENT ACT GRANT FOR SCHOOL ZONE IMPROVEMENTS AT MARSH ELEMENTARY AND JOHN MUIR ELEMENTARY (P.W. 124-3)
G. RESOLUTION NO. 2024/03 FORMATION OF A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FOR THE DECA EAST 18TH STREET COMMERCIAL PROJECTS
H. RESOLUTION NO. 2024/0 4 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT WITH
TERRACARE ASSOCIATES FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES
I. RESOLUTION NO. 2024/0 5 CONSIDERATION OF BIDS FOR VARIOUS ASPHALT
SERVICE CUT REPAIRS
On motion by Councilmember Ogorchock , seconded by Councilmember Barbanica , the City Council unanimously approved the Council Consent Calendar with the exception of Item E, which was removed for further discussion.
Item E – Andrew Becker suggested the City sell this property to REACH and questioned why they were not present for the discussion of this item.
On motion by Councilmember Ogorchock , seconded by Councilmember Barbanica , the City Council unanimously approved Item E.
COUNCIL REGULAR AGENDA
5. ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ACTING CITY MANAGER TO ENTER
INTO A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH SHIELD PROTECTION & PUBLIC SAFETY, INC., DBA SPEARHEAD PROTECTION FOR PRIVATE SECURITY
SERVICES OF CITY -OWNED ASSETS AND PARKING LOTS IN THE
RIVERTOWN/DOWNTOWN AREA, FOR AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $50,000 IN FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 AND $100,000 IN FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Acting City Manager Reed presented the staff report dated January 9, 2024 recommending the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the Acting City Manager to enter into a professional services agreement with Shield Protection & Public Safety, Inc., DBA Spearhead Protection, for private security services of City-owned assets and parking lots in the Rivertown/Downtown area for an amount not to exceed $50,000 in Fiscal Year 2023-24 and $100,000 in Fiscal Year 2024-
25. Melissa Case spoke in support of the resolution and questioned why Antioch was not utilizing the police force to provide security. She suggested police officers become more active with the community within their beats.
ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL
HOUSING SUCCESSOR
Special/Regular Meeting
January 9, 2024 Page 6 of 7
Andrew Becker requested the City provide details of all bid responses and suggested the City address resources for the transient community.
In response to Councilmember Torres-Walker, Acting City Manager Reed clarified approximately nine city-owned assets and parking lots in the Rivertown/ Downtown area were identified in the RFQ. He noted that focus came from previous City Managers; however, if Council wanted staff to look at other city-owned assets they could do so.
Councilmember Ogorchock stated private security was requested for all city-owned assets and parking lots.
Mayor Thorpe commented that this contract could expand in the future to include other city - owned assets and parking lots. He noted this item originated from downtown merchants who were concerned with patrons loitering in the area.
Councilmember Barbanica stated he participated in a meeting with the downtown merchant when this item was discussed, and it was s pecifically for properties north of 1 0th Street. He agreed that the contract could expand in the future.
Councilmember Torres-Walker stated she felt concerns in other areas of the city needed to be addressed with extension of the contract as well as other strategies.
Councilmember Barbanica stated this contract was a starting point in providing a safe place for residents while building up activity downtown.
My Du’bois requested an explanation of the security company’s responsibilities and stated she felt it would be financially feasible for the city to hire private security.
A motion was made by Councilmember Barbanica, seconded by Councilmember Torres-Walker, to adopt a resolution authorizing the Acting City Manager to enter into a professional services agreement with Shield Protection & Public Safety, Inc., DBA Spearhead Protection, for private security services of City-owned assets and parking lots in the Rivertown/Downtown area for an amount not to exceed $50,000 in Fiscal Year 2023-24 and $100,000 in Fiscal Year 2024-25.
Councilmember Ogorchock requested all other city assets and parking lots be added to this agreement. She asked what duties would be performed by the security company.
Acting City Manager Reed responded that the security guards would be unarmed, and would patrol all city assets/parking lots downtown from 5:00 P.M. – 12:00 A.M.
RESOLUTION NO. 2024/06
A vote taken on the previous motion to adopt the resolution was unanimously approved.
ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL
HOUSING SUCCESSOR
Special/Regular Meeting
January 9, 2024 Page 7 of 7
PUBLIC COMMENT
Gavin Payton announced the Know Your Rights Forum would be held at 1:00 P.M. on January 27, 2024, and the Martin Luther King, Jr. Day Breakfast would begin at 8:00 A.M. at Martin Luther King, Jr. Junior High School in Pittsburg.
Melissa Case suggested Mayor Thorpe increase public speaker time when there were shorter agendas.
STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
Acting City Manager Reed announced the Mayor’s Conference would be held at 6:30 P.M. on January 11, 2024, at Smith’s Landing and a Special Council meeting would be held on January 30, 2024, at the Nick Rodriguez Community Center. He also announced that the City would be hiring various positions in the near future.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Councilmember Torres-Walker requested Acting Chief Vigil provide an update on the following:
➢ Traffic enforcement
➢ Regional efforts to address sideshows
➢ Utilization of Antioch Police Department technology
Councilmember Barbanica requested staff agendize a Sideshow Spectator Ordinance.
Councilmember Wilson requested staff agendize a moratorium on new gas stations.
Mayor Thorpe announced the Special Workshop at 6:30 P.M. on January 30, 2024, would not be televised and he encouraged everyone to attend.
ADJOURNMENT
On motion by Councilmember Ogorchock, seconded by Councilmember Torres-Walker, the City Council unanimously adjourned the meeting at 8:17 P.M.
Respectfully submitted:
Kitty Eiden
KITTY EIDEN, Minutes Clerk
CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT
FOR THE PERIOD OF
DECEMBER 29 , 2023 - JANUARY 11 , 2024
FUND/CHECK#
100 General Fund
Non departmental
00410616 RELIABLE ROOFING REFUND CBSC FEE 3.99
00410627 AFLAC INSURANCE PREMIUM 6,012.64
00410649 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PAYROLL 50.00
00410668 LAW OFFICE OF RUTHANN G ZIEGLER LEGAL SERVICES RENDERED 2,722.50 00410670 LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NA PAYROLL 4,769.87
00410677 MUNICIPAL POOLING AUTHORITY PAYROLL 2,293.60
00410688 PARS PAYROLL 4,385.82
00410691 QUADIENT LEASING USA INC POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE 1,403.39 00410698 STATE OF CALIFORNIA PAYROLL 30.00
00410699 STATE OF CALIFORNIA PAYROLL 120.00
00947309 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTIONS PAYROLL 43,954.47 00947315 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTIONS PAYROLL 30,034.60 City Council
00410654 COSTCO VARIOUS BUSINESS EXPENSES 144.97
City Attorney
00410635 ATKINSON ANDELSON LOYA RUUD & ROMO LEGAL SERVICES RENDERED 12,900.00 00410639 BEST BEST AND KRIEGER LLP LEGAL SERVICES RENDERED 13,301.80 00410642 BURKE WILLIAMS AND SORENSEN LLP LEGAL SERVICES RENDERED 841.00 City Manager
00410654 COSTCO VARIOUS BUSINESS EXPENSES 293.86
City Clerk
00410595 ECS IMAGING INC CLOUD STORAGE 25,225.00
00410622 TOTAL RECALL CAPTIONING CAPTIONING SERVICES 876.87 00947301 BAY AREA NEWS GROUP - EAST BAY LEGAL AD 950.60 Human Resources
00410587 BANK OF AMERICA VARIOUS BUSINESS EXPENSES 1,540.67 00410590 CALIF DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FINGERPRINTS 1,390.00 00410593 DIABLO LIVE SCAN LLC FINGERPRINTS 360.00
00410613 OFFICE DEPOT INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 707.20
00410628 ALLSTEEL INC HR ADD-ON FURNITURE 6,926.59
00410696 SIMPSON INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES PRE-EMPLOYMENT BACKGROUND 356.78 00947298 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES COPIER LEASE 278.43
Finance Administration
00410680 OFFICE DEPOT INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 163.41
Finance Accounting
00410636 BADAWI & ASSOCIATES AUDIT SERVICES 6,411.00
00410680 OFFICE DEPOT INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 132.58
Finance Operations
00410628 ALLSTEEL INC WATER DESK ADD ON 3,707.67
00410680 OFFICE DEPOT INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 204.83
Non Departmental
00410684 PACIFIC CREDIT SERVICES COLLECTION FEES 299.50 Public Works Street Maintenance
00410673 LOWES COMPANIES INC TOOLS 449.87
Public Works-Signal/Street Lights
00410634 AT AND T MOBILITY PHONES 92.45
Finance Accounting
Prepared by : A.Cabero
1/18/2024 January 23, 2024
C
CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT
FOR THE PERIOD OF
DECEMBER 29 , 2023 - JANUARY 11 , 2024
FUND/CHECK#
00410686 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC CO ELECTRIC 3,468.37
Public Works-Facilities Maintenance
00410610 MSI FUEL MANAGEMENT INC MAINTENANCE 1,649.00
00410673 LOWES COMPANIES INC BOTTLED WATER 140.30
00410686 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC CO GAS 1,019.99
00410700 STERICYCLE INC DOCUMENT SHREDDING SERVICES 98.00 Public Works-Parks Maint
00410650 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR PROPERTY TAX 512.46 00410656 DC ELECTRIC GROUP INC ELECTRICAL REPAIR 173.91 00410686 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC CO ELECTRIC 522.61
Public Works-Median/General Land
00410686 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC CO ELECTRIC 5.98
Police Administration
00410588 BARNETT MEDICAL SERVICES INC EVIDENCE DISPOSAL 182.00 00410596 FIRST NET SERVICES DEPARTMENT CELL PHONE 7,067.30 00410611 NET TRANSCRIPTS TRANSCRIPT SERVICES 102.54
00410614 PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP INC, THE PRE-EMPLOYMENT MEDICAL 908.00 00410615 PREFERRED ALLIANCE INC PRE-EMPLOYMENT TESTING 63.00 00410660 FORTNER, JOHN C TRAINING REIMBURSEMENT 509.47
00410665 KENDALL, PRICE JULIUS TRAINING PER DIEM 148.00 00947300 COMPUTERLAND COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 1,295.47
Police Community Policing
00410594 RETIREE ADVANCED DISABILITY PENSION 8,984.50
00410601 RETIREE ADVANCED DISABILITY PENSION 5,685.00
00410602 RETIREE ADVANCED DISABILITY PENSION 5,206.00
00410603 RETIREE ADVANCED DISABILITY PENSION 5,466.50
00410604 RETIREE ADVANCED DISABILITY PENSION 5,466.50
00410607 RETIREE ADVANCED DISABILITY PENSION 5,466.50
Police Investigations
00410608 RETIREE ADVANCED DISABILITY PENSION 5,466.50
PD Special Investigations Unit
00410609 RETIREE ADVANCED DISABILITY PENSION 5,685.00
Police Communications
00410584 AMERICAN TOWERS LLC TOWER FEES 1,591.31
00410591 COMCAST CONNECTION SERVICES 2,715.73
00410592 COMCAST CONNECTION SERVICES 161.80
Office Of Emergency Management
00410633 AT AND T MCI PHONES 458.98
Police Facilities Maintenance
00410628 ALLSTEEL INC FURNITURE 9,772.38
00410673 LOWES COMPANIES INC SUPPLIES 108.94
Youth Network Services
00410625 AASHNA KUMAR INTERNSHIP 548.10
00410630 ANGELA RAMOS INTERNSHIP 131.00
00410674 MICAH EMANUEL DORSEY INTERNSHIP 391.50
00410682 OLUWASHORE ODUSANYA INTERNSHIP 574.20
00410687 PARENTS CONNECTED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 9,000.00 Community Development Land Planning Services
Finance Accounting
Prepared by : A.Cabero
1/18/2024 January 23, 2024
CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT
FOR THE PERIOD OF
DECEMBER 29 , 2023 - JANUARY 11 , 2024
FUND/CHECK#
00947301 BAY AREA NEWS GROUP - EAST BAY LEGAL AD 737.20 PW Engineer Land Development
00410612 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CA PRE-EMPLOYMENT MEDICAL 580.00 00410680 OFFICE DEPOT INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 43.02
Community Development Building Inspection
00410612 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CA PRE-EMPLOYMENT MEDICAL 493.00 00410616 RELIABLE ROOFING REFUND ENERGY INSP FEE 394.42 00410651 CONTRA COSTA FIRE EQUIPMENT FIRE EXTINGUISHERS SERVICE 685.84 Capital Imp. Administration
00410680 OFFICE DEPOT INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 65.46
206 American Rescue Plan Fund
Non Departmental
00410631 ANTIOCH HISTORICAL SOCIETY ARPA SMALL BUSINESS GRANT 10,000.00 00410645 CHI T. VO AND HIEN T. BUI ARPA SMALL BUSINESS GRANT 15,000.00 00410666 KENNETH R TURNAGE II ARPA SMALL BUSINESS GRANT 15,000.00 00410672 LINDA L JOHNSON ARPA SMALL BUSINESS GRANT 5,000.00 00410681 OLAKUNLE FLASH AYODEJI ARPA SMALL BUSINESS GRANT 10,000.00 00410689 PEDRO HORTA ARPA SMALL BUSINESS GRANT 10,000.00 00410690 PRECISION LEAK DETECTION INC ARPA SMALL BUSINESS GRANT 15,000.00 00410692 REJOICE COFFEE COMPANY LLC ARPA SMALL BUSINESS GRANT 10,000.00 00410697 SP ENTERPRISES INC ARPA SMALL BUSINESS GRANT 10,000.00 00410704 WONG CANTONESE RESTAURANT CORP ARPA SMALL BUSINESS GRANT 10,000.00 00410706 XUAN TRAN ARPA SMALL BUSINESS GRANT 5,000.00
00947307 JACQUELINE AZEVEDO ARPA SMALL BUSINESS GRANT 10,000.00 213 Gas Tax Fund
Streets
00410686 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC CO ELECTRIC 1,373.14
214 Animal Services Fund
Animal Services
00410657 EAST BAY VETERINARY EMERGENCY VETERINARY SERVICES 2,208.22 00410658 EAST HILLS VETERINARY HOSPITAL VET SERVICES 185.25 00410663 HILLS PET NUTRITION PET FOOD 370.94
00410667 KOEFRAN SERVICES INC CREMATION SERVICES 140.00 00410678 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY CO VET SUPPLIES 1,836.06 00947300 COMPUTERLAND COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 220.30
00947302 COMPUTERLAND COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 1,699.46
219 Recreation Fund
Non departmental
00410597 ANTIOCH HIGH SCHOOL WINTER BALL DEPOSIT REFUND 500.00 00410620 TEAM JESUS MINISTRIES DEPOSIT REFUND 500.00
00410621 THE DRAMA FACTORY DEPOSIT REFUND 500.00
00410638 BANK OF AMERICA VARIOUS BUSINESS EXPENSES 1,781.81 Senior Programs
00410629 AMERICAN STAGE TOURS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,340.00 Recreation-Comm Center
00410589 BE EXCEPTIONAL CONTRACTOR PAYMENT 672.00
00410605 KRISTIES TWISTED CREATIONS CONTRACTOR PAYMENT 237.60 00410623 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE NEWSLETTER MAILING SERVICE 500.00
Finance Accounting
Prepared by : A.Cabero
1/18/2024 January 23, 2024
CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT
FOR THE PERIOD OF
DECEMBER 29 , 2023 - JANUARY 11 , 2024
FUND/CHECK#
00410624 4IMPRINT CITY PROMOTIONAL PRODUCTS 4,151.83
00410632 AT AND T MCI PHONES 62.87
00410638 BANK OF AMERICA VARIOUS BUSINESS EXPENSES 2,411.61 00410686 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC CO GAS 12,575.13
00410705 WRIGHT, SHAHAD ZAIRE MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 85.15 Recreation Water Park
00410606 LIMBLE SOLUTIONS INC LICENSE FEES 732.00
00410613 OFFICE DEPOT INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 164.75
00410637 BANK OF AMERICA VARIOUS BUSINESS EXPENSES 3,700.24 229 Pollution Elimination Fund
Channel Maintenance Operation
00410652 CONTRA COSTA HEALTH SERVICES ANTIOCH CITY DUMP 298.50 255 Park 1A Maintenance District Fund
Park 1A Maintenance District
00410648 COMCAST CONNECTION SERVICES 113.80
00410686 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC CO GAS 163.64
376 Lone Diamond Fund
Assessment District
00410644 CENTRAL SELF STORAGE ANTIOCH MONTHLY STORAGE FEES 448.00 570 Equipment Maintenance Fund
Non departmental
00410664 HUNT AND SONS INC FUEL 13,261.62
Equipment Maintenance
00410640 BILL BRANDT FORD AUTO REPAIR AND PARTS 4,329.52 00410646 CHUCKS BRAKE AND WHEEL SERVICE AUTO REPAIR 968.15 00410659 FASTENAL CO AUTO PARTS 19.54
00410669 LES SCHWAB TIRES OF CALIFORNIA PARTS AND REPAIRS 1,087.91 00410671 LIM AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLY INC AUTO PARTS 3,792.92
00410676 MUNICIPAL MAINT EQUIPMENT INC REPAIR PARTS 2,372.18 00410683 OREILLY AUTO PARTS AUTO PARTS 2,406.03
00410695 ROYAL BRASS INC PARTS 34.82
00410703 WALNUT CREEK FORD PARTS 2,060.30
00947306 GRAINGER INC PARTS 242.01
00947308 KIMBALL MIDWEST PARTS 918.43
00947311 PETERSON TRACTOR CO PARTS AND SERVICES 2,017.79 00947314 UNLIMITED GRAPHIC AND SIGN NETWORK VEHICLE DECALS 3,812.51 573 Information Services Fund
Network Support & PCs
00410591 COMCAST CONNECTION SERVICES 2,715.74
Telephone System
00410632 AT AND T MCI PHONES 2,616.30
00410633 AT AND T MCI PHONES 3,474.42
GIS Support Services
00410643 CA SURVEYING AND DRAFTING SUPPLY SUPPLIES 2,065.76 577 Post Retirement Medical-Police Fund
Non Departmental
00947303 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,557.12
00947304 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,268.03
Finance Accounting
Prepared by : A.Cabero
1/18/2024 January 23, 2024
CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT
FOR THE PERIOD OF
DECEMBER 29 , 2023 - JANUARY 11 , 2024
FUND/CHECK#
578 Post Retirement Medical-Misc Fund
Non Departmental
00947305 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 709.38
579 Post Retirement Medical-Mgmt Fund
Non Departmental
00947310 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 137.69
580 Loss Control Fund
Human Resources
00410582 AED MARKET DEFIBRILLATORS 9,548.25
611 Water Fund
Non departmental
00410617 ROADSAFE TRAFFIC SYSTEMS INC TRAFFIC SAFETY SUPPLIES 526.01 00410641 BISHOP CO SHOVELS 397.01
00410673 LOWES COMPANIES INC CONCRETE 249.11
00410693 ROADSAFE TRAFFIC SYSTEMS INC SAFETY SUPPLIES 7,171.06 00410701 SUNRISE ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPLIES 204.39
Water Supervision
00301356 PEREZ, ZAYDA SAME DAY FEE 150.00
Water Production
00410583 ALTA FENCE FENCE REPAIR 520.00
00410585 ANTIOCH ACE HARDWARE SUPPLIES 813.15
00410586 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES CLEANING SUPPLIES 216.68 00410598 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS LLC SUPPLIES 1,804.45 00410599 HASA INC CHEMICALS 15,171.76
00410612 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CA PRE-EMPLOYMENT MEDICAL 999.00 00410619 ROBINS LOCK AND KEY LOCK REPAIR 261.49
00410632 AT AND T MCI PHONES 126.07
00410653 CONTRA COSTA WATER DISTRICT MAIN CANAL 958,473.11 00410661 HAWTHORN VENTURES LLC UNIFORMS 78.26
00410662 HI-VOLTAGE SPLICING CO INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,500.00 00410673 LOWES COMPANIES INC BOTTLED WATER 458.75
00410686 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC CO ELECTRIC 64.76
00410702 SWAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS USA REPAIR SERVICES 344.80 00947299 CHEMTRADE CHEMICALS US LLC CHEMICALS 7,745.81
00947312 RED WING SHOE STORE SAFETY BOOTS 350.00
Water Distribution
00410600 HAWTHORN VENTURES LLC UNIFORMS 341.28
00410626 ACCOUNTEMPS TEMP HELP 453.20
00410647 CITY OF BRENTWOOD GROUNDWATER SUPPORT 603.50
00410673 LOWES COMPANIES INC FITTINGS 31.25
00410675 MULTIQUIP INC EQUIPMENT 3,191.57
00410679 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CA PRE-EMPLOYMENT MEDICAL 2,922.00 621 Sewer Fund
Swr-Wastewater Administration
00410618 ROBERTS AND BRUNE CO PIPE FITTINGS 8,075.41
00410626 ACCOUNTEMPS TEMP HELP 453.20
00410655 CWEA SFBS CERTIFICATION RENEWAL 98.00
00410673 LOWES COMPANIES INC SUPPLIES 436.80
Finance Accounting
Prepared by : A.Cabero
1/18/2024 January 23, 2024
CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT
FOR THE PERIOD OF
DECEMBER 29 , 2023 - JANUARY 11 , 2024
FUND/CHECK#
00410694 ROBERTS AND BRUNE CO PIPE FITTINGS 6,050.52
00947313 SCOTTO, CHARLES W AND DONNA F FEBRUARY 2024 RENT 5,000.00 631 Marina Fund
Marina Administration
00410600 HAWTHORN VENTURES LLC UNIFORMS 660.01
Finance Accounting
Prepared by : A.Cabero
1/18/2024 January 23, 2024
6 Agenda Item #
STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: Regular Meeting of January 23, 2024
SUBMITTED BY: Kevin Valente, Contract Planner
Raney Planning & Management, Inc.
APPROVED BY:
SUBJECT:
Kevin Scudero, Acting Community Development Director - KS Vineyard Crossing Preliminary Development Plan (PRE2023-003)
RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended the City Council provide feedback to the applicant and City staff regarding the proposal and provide direction to the applicant for the Final Development Plan submittal.
FISCAL IMPACT
The development of the Vineyard Crossing Project will be fully funded by the applicant, BrightSky Residential LLC. The City will incur no costs in the development.
DISCUSSION
Request
Reggie Decker and Charles McKeag, BrightSky Residential LLC, request Preliminary Development Plan review of a proposal to develop approximately 71 single-family residences (SFRs) and 70 accessory dwelling units (ADUs) on 71 residential lots. The
14.6-acre project site is located north of Oakley Road and west of Phillips Lane and currently contains an existing vineyard (APNs 051 -191-028-4 and 051 -191-034-2). The proposed project currently includes amenities for the residents consisting of a recreation center, pool, and spa, as well as pedestrian paths throughout the proposed open space areas (the existing vineyard that will remain). In addition, the pr oposed project includes approximately two bioretention areas totaling 1.76 -acres. The project site would have primary site access from Oakley Road and Phillips Lane, and new internal neighborhood streets. The applicant's project plans and project description are provided as Attachments A and B, respectively.
Environmental
Preliminary Development Plan review is a non -entitlement action and does not require environmental review. The future project application review would require compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Antioch City Council Report
January 23, 2024 Agenda Item #6
Background
The proposed project site is located on two parcels totaling an approximate 14.6-acres at the intersection of Oakley Road and Phillips Lane with a Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) utility easement dividing the project site. The west parcel has a General Plan designation of Medium Low Density Residential (MLDR) and the east parcel is Medium Density Residential (MDR) and both parcels are currently zoned Planned Development (PD). The project site is currently a vineyard with an adjacent single -family residence (SFR) to the south along Oakley Road that is not part of this project and is proposed to remain. The project site is surrounded by SFRs to the north, east, and west with vacant land to the south.
The project application was submitted to the City in June 2023, and staff determined the application was complete in September 2023 and was routed to City Departments and outside agencies for review. Comment letters have been provided by City Engineering staff, PG&E, Chevron, Contra Costa County Flood Control District, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District (CCCFPD) (Attachment D). These comments include modifying the width of streets, parking spaces, improving fire lane access, and relocating bioretention areas. All these issues are discussed in more detail below.
The purpose of a Preliminary Development Plan is to gather feedback from the Planning Commission and others in order for the applicant to become aware of concerns and/or issues prior to final development plan and tentative map submittal. As standard practice, preliminary plans are not conditioned; rather a list of needed items, information, and issues to be addressed is compiled for the applicant to address prior to submitting an entitlement application.
ANALYSIS
Project Overview
The applicant proposes to remove the eastern and western portions of the existing vineyard that is separated by a PG&E easement which would remain undeveloped other than the proposed neighborhood street and pedestrian path. The proposed project includes 71 lots for SFRs with an ADU on all but one of the lots. All units are currently proposed to be renter occupied. The proposed unit mix includes three different SFR floor plans that range in size from 1,492 to 1,697 square feet (sf) and two different ADU floo r plans that range in size from 603 to 750 sf. Each SFR included in the proposed project would have an attached two-car garage with a driveway and each ADU would include a driveway for one vehicle parking space. The proposed homes would include front yard landscaping maintained by the developers who would also retain ownership of the proposed rental community. The proposed recreational amenities include a recreation center including the leasing and managers offices, pool, and spa for the community, as well as trails between the east and west parcels, trails within the vineyards, three vineyard lounges and three vineyard picnic areas.
Antioch City Council Report
January 23, 2024 Agenda Item #6
2 Location Map
Project Site Map
Project Location
Antioch City Council Report
January 23, 2024 Agenda Item #6
Consistency with the General Plan and Zoning
The project site has an existing General Plan Land Use designation as MLDR and MDR.
The entire project site is currently zoned PD. Residential uses are permitted within these existing land use designations and future development would require approval of a tentative subdivision map, final development plan, and planned development rezone to establish the development standards for the community.
Density
Pursuant to the Antioch General Plan, the maximum allowable density in the MLDR land use designation is six dwelling units per gross developable acre (du/ac) and the maximum allowable density in the MDR land use designation is ten du/ac. The current proposed gross density for the entire project site would be 4.86 du/ac. The calculated gross density for just the western property is 4.71 du/ac, which has the MLDR and allows for a maximum of six du/ac. The calculated density for the just the eastern property i s 4.90 du/ac, which has the MDR land use designation and allows for a maximum of ten du/ac. The City’s General Plan in section 4.4.1.1 states that density accrues to lands that are developable, which means, in part, lands that are not encumbered by prior dedications of easements or rights of way. The northern portion of both properties is encum bered by a PG&E easement and would not be included in gross developable density calculations. At entitlement submittal, the applicant will need to show that the gross developable density calculations for each property do not exceed the maximum allowed densities in the General Plan.
Zoning Standards
The proposed project site is currently zoned PD. The intent of the PD district is to allow some flexibility from zoning standards in order to better integrate a project into its setting, while maintaining consistency with the General Plan. Because of this flexibility the existing PD zoning designation would be most appropriate for this project. As a result, the proposed project would include a PD rezone which would be required to establish these specific development standards, including lot size, yard setba cks, and building height requirements.
Staff reviewed the current development standards in the R-6 Single-Family Residential District and the R-10 Medium Density Residential District as a comparison for consistency with the development intended for the MLDR and MDR land use designations. It should be noted that the R-6 Single-Family Residential District is consistent with the MLDR land use designation of four to six dwelling units per gross developable acre and the R -10 Medium Density Residential District is consistent with the MDR land use designation which allows six to ten dwelling units per gross developable acre. Typical development would include attached and/or cluster-type, ownership, oriented units including some with private yards and common recreation areas.
Antioch City Council Report
January 23, 2024 Agenda Item #6
2 The proposed residential building heights and front yard setbacks for the SFRs are consistent with the R -6 and R -10 district regulations. However, the proposed project includes varying interior side and rear yard setbacks that are not consistent with the minimum five-foot interior side yard setback and 10 -foot rear yard setbacks of the R -6 and R-10 districts respectively. The proposed project currently includes some four -foot interior side yard setbacks and some rear yard setbacks as small as six feet. The proposed lot sizes range from 4,125 sf to 7,369 sf, whereas minimum building lot sizes for both the R -6 and R -10 zoning district is 6,000 sf. Out of the proposed 71 lots, only seven meet the minimum lot size requirement for the R-6 and R-10 zoning districts and a majority of the proposed lots do not meet the minimum lot width, which would be 65 -feet for a corner lot and 60-feet for an interior lot. Maximum lot coverage for the R-6 and R-10 zoning district is 40 percent and if the largest floor plan is built on the smallest lot, it would result in a 53 percent lot coverage. If the largest floor plan was built on the largest lot, it would result in a 30 percent lot coverage. As mentioned above, the proposed project’s density would be consistent with the R-6 density range of four to six du/ac, but not the R- 10 density range of six to ten du/ac. Staff recommends the City Council consider the proposed lot sizes and setbacks and provide feedback to establish the final development plan and standards the proposed PD standards.
The Antioch Municipal Code also provides development standards for detached ADUs that are smaller than 800 sf related to building height and rear and side yard setbacks.
The proposed project’s ADUs are consistent with the citywide ADU development standards for maximum height of 16 -feet and four -foot side and rear yard setbacks, as well as the standards for ADUs provided by the State of California.
Site Layout and Design
The City of Antioch adopted citywide Single -Family and Missing Middle Residential Objective Design Standards relating to all aspects of residential projects including building siting, architectural style, parking, and landscaping in August 2023, after this Preliminary Development Plan was submitted. The entitlement application will be subject to these standards. A list of the relevant stan dards and how the project complies with them is included as Attachment C, and a detailed discussion of the issues is provided below. The submittal of the Objective Design Standards Checklist will be required at the time of Design Review application to illustrate compliance.
Building Siting and Massing
The City’s Objective Design Standards require projects to be oriented to adjacent streets with varying setbacks to present an attractive façade to the right -of-way. The proposed project consists of 71 SFRs and 70 ADUs. Each SFR would have an attached two -car garage with driveway, and each ADU would have a driveway for one vehicle parking space. The proposed front yard setbacks would vary from a minimum of 20 feet to a maximum of 42 feet.
Antioch City Council Report
January 23, 2024 Agenda Item #6
3 The proposed project would include three different floor plan options ranging in size from 1,492 sf to 1,697 sf, with three complimentary elevations each – farmhouse, transitional, and craftsman. Additionally, beyond the traditional construction of SFRs, t he proposed project would include two different ADU options ranging in size from 603 sf or 750 sf, with three elevations matching the SFRs. The applicant is providing ADUs as an opportunity to provide a variety of housing and affordability options for a broad spectrum of people.
Recreational Amenities
The Objective Design Standards require buildings to be oriented to create courtyards and open space areas and that community facilities and open spaces be conveniently located for the majority of residents. The proposed leasing office, recreation center, pool, and spa would be located near the center of the west parcel. Amenities would include restrooms, showers, lounges, picnic tables, and a pump room. Two decomposed granite trails would be provided connecting the two parcels cutting through the PG&E easem ent with picnic areas, rail fencing, and low stone walls along the path. The residences located in the west property would be able to easily access the community facilities and pool. However, the east site lacks complete connectivity to the proposed commun ity facilities. Additional active open space areas and increased pedestrian connectivity would comply with the City’s Objective Design Standards.
Landscaping and Fencing
The total landscaped area would consist of approximately 1.04-acres of shrubs, turf, and trees. Plant material for this project would be locally acclimated, drought tolerant, and moderate or low water use. The applicant has chosen the proposed trees for th e project for their form and structure to provide shade onto paved surfaces and pedestrians.
Residential units would be landscaped with decorative mulch, synthetic lawns, concrete patios, and street trees. The proposed entry features include a six -foot tall masonry wall with pilasters on both sides of the entry drive, with project entry signage. The proposed project includes a variety of trees along the project boundary and neighborhood streets.
Six-foot tall backyard wood fencing would be included for each residential lot. The proposed landscaping and fencing connectivity would comply with the City’s Objective Design Standards.
Architecture
As mentioned previously, the proposed architecture consists of three styles. The Craftsman style features a lap siding and stucco exterior with board and batten and decorative wood corbels at the upper gables, with a decorative stone veneer. The Transitional style features a stucco exterior with a decorative brick veneer. The Farmhouse style features a stucco and board and batten exterior with decorative wood corbels. The three proposed architectural styles for both the SFRs and ADUs include visually interesting architectural elements and style variation, which would comply with the City’s Objective Design Standards.
Antioch City Council Report
January 23, 2024 Agenda Item #6
4 Traffic, Circulation, and Parking
The proposed project includes primary site access through Oakley Road and Phillips Lane into a new internal roadway network, which includes 36-foot-wide and 32-foot-wide roads. City Engineering and the CCFPD have concerns regarding the currently proposed street widths as emergency service vehicles would not be able to access the residences along the narrow street in the eastern parcel with street parking on both sides of the street.
Therefore, City Engineering identifies that the proposed 32 -foot-wide road is too narrow to support parking on both sides, and parking would be limited to one side of the street.
Staff would need the internal roadways to be a minimum of 38-feet-wide from curb to curb to accommodate two 11 -foot travel lanes, eight -foot parking lanes, and two five -foot sidewalks on each side. In addition, each proposed SFR would have a two -car garage with driveway and each ADU would include a parking pad with driveway. Therefore, each proposed lot would include two driveways, which would severely limit street parking options for residents and guests. As a result, City Engineering requests a parking plan to show how many vehicles would be able to use street parking. City Engineering is also requesting concept designs of the proposed sewer system and a mor e complete preliminary grading plan. In addition, pursuant to the CCCFPD comment letter, lots 43 and 46 also do not currently meet access requirements for fire apparatus.
Other Issues
The proposed project is proposed to be renter occupied. However, nothing precludes the applicant from selling the lots individually in the future. Staff would require the formation of a homeowner’s association (HOA) to ensure maintenance of all common areas would be covered should the lots be sold in the future. In addition, per the Antioch Municipal Code:
• The ADU may not be sold separately from the primary dwelling; • The ADU is restricted to the approved size and to other attributes allowed by the code.
Public Comments
In addition to the City receiving comment letters from the CCCFPD and City Engineering, comments letters from PG&E and Chevron were received. PG&E commented on the need for the proposed bioretention facilities to not impact their existing easement, as well as the need for low growing landscaping in their easement to not impact the existing overhead lines. In addition, the proposed roadway and pedestrian pathways through the PG&E easement would require a third-party approval by PG&E, and the project applicant would need to secure the necessary leases, licenses, and a California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) approval and/or 851 filing. Chevron did not provide any comments requesting changes to the project. Other comments letters received are from the Cont ra Costa County Flood Control District and from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. The letters are provided in Attachment D.
Antioch City Council Report
January 23, 2024 Agenda Item #6
5 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
On December 6, 2023, the Antioch Planning Commission held a public hearing and provided comments and feedback to the applicant regarding the Preliminary Development Plan.
The Planning Commission was in support of the project’s architectural designs but did not support the currently proposed small lots and setbacks, narrow roads, and trails that do not seem to offer much benefit to the residents. The Commissioners requested additional active open spaces, native landscaping, and parking. The Planning Commission also provided concerns regarding the development being renter occupied.
Public Comments
Members of the public also spoke on the project, expressing concerns for the small lots, lack of parking, a corporate owned subdivision, and the need to integrate local and native plant species into the development.
CONCLUSION
Staff is supportive of the architectural styles and proposed design of the residences; however, staff has a number of concerns with the proposed project’s street design and access, pedestrian connectivity, lack of active recreation amenities. Staff recomme nds that the City Council provide the applicant feedback concerning staff’s recommendations below, as well as other areas of concern the Council may have.
Staff Recommendations
• Provide active recreational areas.
• Provide increased pedestrian connectivity to the proposed recreation center/pool. • Provide internal local private residential street sections that are consistent with minimum Engineering standards, including travel lanes, street parking, and sidewalk widths.
• Provide concept designs of the proposed sewer system and a more complete preliminary grading plan.
• Coordinate with the CCCFPD to ensure compliance with the 2022 California Fire Code (CFC), the 2022 California Building Code (CBC), the 2022 California Residential Code (CRC), and all Local and County Ordinances and adopted standards.
• Coordinate with PG&E to ensure the existing easement is not impacted due to this proposed development.
Antioch City Council Report
January 23, 2024 Agenda Item #6
6 ATTACHMENTS
A. Project Plans
B. Applicant’s Project Description
C. Objective Standards Review
D. Comments
E. December 6, 2023 Draft Planning Commission Minutes
FILBERT STREET
12345
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
2425
26 27
28 29
30 3132
33 34
35 36
37 38
39 40 41 42
4344
45 46 47
48 49 50 51 52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
6061
62 63
6465
66 67 68
697071
OAKLEY ROAD
PHILLIPS LANE
HONEYNUT
STREET LEGEND
GENERAL NOTES
CONTACTS
DMA 1
IMP 1
25 CITY OF ANTIOCH CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA
PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN
VINEYARD CROSSING
VICINITY MAP
N
SITE
SITE PLAN
SCALE: 1" = 100'
SHEET INDEX
SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE
SUBDIVISION 09650
H:\3705\ACAD\PDP\C0.0-COVER.DWG
PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN
VINEYARD CROSSING
CITY OF ANTIOCH CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA SCALE: 1" = 50'DATE: JULY 2023
CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS
SAN RAMON
WWW.CBANDG.COM
ROSEVILLE
(925) 866-0322
(916) 788-4456
OF SHEETS
SHEET NO.
73002001000
C0.0
TITLE SHEET
100'
ABBREVIATIONS
PARKING SUMMARY
PARKING TYPEPROVIDED REQUIRED
ATTACHMENT A
A1
59. 16,6
X
55.8 56.6
X
)6.9
66.8 X
5/J.8
5'
PUE
X
61.9 □
o.:,.f X J
X 66.J
�
65 .J X
PARCELD
(WATER QUALITY}
56,059 SF±
f" z0 W a:, :,;
xww�
X
□
772
X
� 1 7'
:6.4
HH,r
_
"-._------
1 -
40 7
'
-----.---
55 7'---,---
55 -,----,---
55 -,---.---
5 -
5'
-�--
5 -
5' ____
5 _
5 _
'
....L..�--
5 -
5 -, ----
55 -, ----
55 -,----
54 -,-�-----
13 6,968 SF± �
9'
14 4,137 SF±
55'
;,,r-- 15
4,140 SF±
55'
16 17 18
4,144 SF± 4,147 SF± 4,151 SF±
55' 55' 55'
19 le 20 le 21 "' 22 r-- 23 ::\.
4,154 SF± 4,158 SF± 4,161 SF± 4,165 SF± 4,527 SF±
7 55' 55' 55' 55' 65'
X
75.1 X
75.8 X
75.4 76.4 X
x 75.8
75.J
X
x 75.1
75,5
X
74.6 X
75.7 76.7 X
0 - 76.9-
76.6 X
...J
-!.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ·: :: :: : :: :y::: .. - · ... · : ... : ............. ••c· .. .... lf:.-·i· ......... , ... . 672
X
X
672
;,,"'
;,,"'
;,,"'
;,,"'
23' 7'
R/W
51.0 X
FC
5.5' 1 • 7'
SW PARKING
R/W
FC
5' 5.5' 8'
18'
PUE SW PARKING
12 5,903 SF±
3'
75'
11 -LO :-:LO :.
4,125 SF±
/
39 �
: 2 4,452 SF±
60'
40 4,212 SF±
15' 41'
;,,
55'
41 4,125 SF±
55'
;,,r--
45'
24'
42 0 ..
4,452 SF± m :::.
60'
PARCELi
:•:• LO.. ...
(..) ...J -LL -a.. --'° , __ ,._ ,-----I"") U V _J
62'
24'
32 4,557 SF±
77'
Lo. c..
0 58'
24'
31 4,347 SF±
73'
36'
. . .... . ......... ....... .. .. .. ............... ··:
.
J::: ..
45'
24'
25 .·.: 2 4,452 SF±
60'
;,,r--
51'
24 4,261 SF±
62'
. ..... ····················-..:..-. ....
X 7J.6
73.1 X
X
71.6 X
70.6 75'
O:·: "' •• 33 30
FC-FC
I X 70,4
10 4,125 SF±
75'
9 4,125 SF±
75'
8 4,125 SF±
75'
7 4,127 SF±
10·--·
76'
6 7,246 SF±
5 I
36'
FC-FC
I
47'
PL-PL
I
6,726 SF±
121'
44 4,125 SF±
75'
75'
45 4,125 SF±
75'
;,, 4 r--
;,,"' 43
5,862 SF± j,J
78'
46 0 "'
7,369 SF± ;,,"' "'
78'
PARCEL A
(AMENITY)
19,605 SF±
(..) ...J• LL - a._ -<O I- r"- 1---
,..., (.) � -I
;,,r--
Lo. c..
3 ;,,r-- 2
9'
4,125 SF± 4,125 SF± 4,125 SF±
55' 55' 55'
78'
48 4,284 SF±
78'
47 4,284 SF±
69'
1 4,452 SF±
60'
o ·.
<0 ·:
36'
FC-FC
I
47'
PL-PL
4,221 SF±
77'
34 4,221 SF±
77'
35 4,393 SF±
77'
36 5,066 SF±
"' <O
77' 7J.J
:1----:..:....---1,g
:: Ol .-. lO
37 "' 'a:,4,528 SF± ,,,
77' 0
l-__ ..:...;. __ --10
.iii"
38 0 <O
"' • 47' U') :·:· .. :. 'io4,029 SF± 1-+-
--,-�-H· ,,,PL-PL
73'
29 4,029 SF±
73'
28 4,627 SF±
118'
•
74.JX
X 14.1
74.6 14.5
X
X
:. N:
:. 0-
X
05 ·J - ·J 90-027
X
72.7 4,605 SF±
77'
PARCELF
i,151 SF± ,.,.o
18'
12.7 X
26 6,909 SF±
125'
27 5,687 SF±
11.J
X
95'
70.2 69.6
X X
69.9 69.4
X X X
69.2 X
69.5 69.2 68.7 68.6 fiQ , x _x_051-J90-021
69.6 X
69.6 X X
69.5 X
70.7 X
69.5 X
69.4 X
70.5 X 7 69.7 71.4
;,, a:,
PARCELB
(WATERQUALITY) ,---.....
20,842 SF±
69.1 X
X
69.1 PARCELG
1,535 SF±
101'
X 68.2
10.5 X
71.4 11.1 X
72.5 X
PARCELE 5,637 SF± LO ._. 73.6 X
72.4 71.5 �
"'· PARCEL 0
376'
47' R/W
CL/CROWN
18'
1,. 11'
FC
7' • I 5.5· 5'
LANE LANE PARKING SW PUE
NOT TO SCALE
43'
CL/CROWN (PUE, PAE, EVAE)
2a 17'
12' 12'
LANE LANE
2% 2% - -
R/W
FC ,
5 , 5,5
SW PUE
EX
R/W
052-051 -o ·J 3
22.5'
EP-TC
..- ·:
BO
52.5'
15.9 X
76.4 77'
X
76.J
X
16.4 + X 16.5
EX PROPOSED
R/W R/W
7.5'
15'
37.5'±
1 EP-TC DEDICATION
X 7.,:, 7
LL
1.5' 18.5' 0-5' 20'- 25'
�S �AWC-UT _E_X_R_□- AD_ .. , 1----�SC�-�TC----i--s-w--i-�--1--L-S -----i
I !
X X
X 66.6
676 X
672
R/W 45' R/W
R/W-R/W
37.5'±
EP-TC
19'± I
EP-SC I
I
I
18.5'
SC-TC
�m== - =====
•
[/;;=JI IF"
-�-mm;';:;11�1 - - ,.. "'TTTg!J[�mi{-m rim'¥-., I� , � �"
OAKLEY ROAD
(OUTSIDE PROJECT FRONTAGE)
NOT TO SCALE
- z
89'50'21"E 3� .39'
70.4 X X 71.5
724
I owa:, "'
x w PARCELC
26,649 SF± □
otHf-t---,[email protected]�....j, a:,
w� w
75' 60'
49 le 50
5,315 SF± 4,574 SF±
60'
le 51
4,578 SF±
60'
<.O r--
60'
52 4,582 SF±
60'
. ti' - � PARCEL J -'° I_,._ I ---
O•
...J
a,_
;
64'
71 ;,,
4,361 SF± r--
,.., U V _J
Lo. c..
55'
70 ;,,r--
4,125 SF±
45'
24'
69 4,452 SF± 2 :·:
N·l----,---4-----1----�
,i. 53' 55' 60'
a,
�
\5_ ...J 66 "'
a,_ r--3,547 SF±
67 4,125 SF±
;,,r-- 68
4,500 SF±
LO :.r--. ':
"' r--
67'
53 5,057 SF±
66'
66'
24'
54 4,793 SF±
80'
55 4,659 SF±
80'
0 <O
1c"'
5'
5'
.J
ARCELK
382 SF±'
I 14.8
15.9 16.
1b.5 X
I I
16. � 0
z
j,
CZl I
56 32,
l---r-=
42 ;._
'
_.1..__::::
55 :...
'
_....J.._-...:
6 :.:::.
0'
_--I i-F-C--F-C -1.::: :g
I
4,404 SF±
<O"'
70.4 �t
-'-
-Rn"-1T-7:;.-----1-k�43�' ...u---
7 !.::'.
9 -· ----i 80' 74' PL-PL I I X
11.7 X
72.5 X
X
12.4 72.J
X
X 614
...J
a,_
65 5,500 SF±
1,.
1------' r--
58'
72. ... ca.
1c 64
<O
5,039 SF±
74'
63 7,265 SF±
CCI _.
<O.
X 1----------___;�
135'
62 6,123 SF±
83'
61 5,023 SF±
64.0 X
:·:. Ol •• "' 57
4,681 SF±
"o <O
15.4 I
1a·
- I
...._ _ ___;_:_ __ � PARCEL H
58 4,640 SF±
78'
59 4,598 SF±
77'
60 0
<O
0 <.O
;,Jl.5'
..
72.6 5,608 SF±
1 6:70
X
0.00 X
70.5 PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN
PRELIMINARY LOTTING
VINEY ARD CROSSING
0 50
CITY OF ANTIOCH CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA
SCALE: 1" = 50' DATE: JUNE 2023
100 150
cbg
SAN RAMON ■ (925) 866-0322
ROSEVILLE ■ (916) 788-4456
WWW.CBANDG.COM
CIVIL ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS ■ PLANNERS
SHEET NO.
Cl.O
OF 7 SHEETS
H:\3705\ACADIPDP\C1 .0-PRELIM INARY LOTTING.DWG
A2
OAKLEY ROAD
PHILLIPS LANE
H:\3705\ACAD\PDP\C2.0-EXISTING CONDITIONS.DWG
PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN
VINEYARD CROSSING
CITY OF ANTIOCH CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA SCALE: 1" = 50'DATE: JUNE 2023
150100500 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS
SAN RAMON
WWW.CBANDG.COM
ROSEVILLE
(925) 866-0322
(916) 788-4456
OF SHEETS
SHEET NO.
7 C2.0
EXISTING CONDITIONS
A3
OAKLEY ROAD
PHILLIPS LANE
13 7
9 11 39 42
48 44
1916 21 23
29 36
38 61
65 71 69
5250
68 2
535149
70 66
55 57
59 62
64 27
25 33
3141
46 47
10 12
14 18 20
5 35
60 58
56 54
67 63
24 26
28 30
32 34
37 40
43 45
8 6
4 13 15 17 22
BIORETENTION
HONEYNUT STREET
BIORETENTION
PARCEL A
AMENITY
H:\3705\ACAD\PDP\C3.0 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN.DWG
PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN
VINEYARD CROSSING
CITY OF ANTIOCH CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA SCALE: 1" = 50'DATE: JUNE 2023
150100500 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS
SAN RAMON
WWW.CBANDG.COM
ROSEVILLE
(925) 866-0322
(916) 788-4456
OF SHEETS
SHEET NO.
7 H:\3705\ACAD\PDP\C3.0 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN.DWG
PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN
VINEYARD CROSSING
CITY OF ANTIOCH CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA SCALE: 1" = 50'DATE: JUNE 2023
150100500 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS
SAN RAMON
WWW.CBANDG.COM
ROSEVILLE
(925) 866-0322
(916) 788-4456
OF SHEETS
SHEET NO.
7 C3.0
PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN
UNIT MIX SUMMARY
PLAN UNIT COUNT % MIX
A4
PARCEL A
(AMENITY)
PARCEL B
(WATER QUALITY)
PARCEL C
PARCEL D
(WATER QUALITY)
12345
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
2425
26 27
28 29
30 3132
33 34
35 36
37 38
39 40 41 42
4344
45 46 47
48 49 50 51 52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
6061
62 63
6465
66 67 68
697071
P 77.0 P 76.0 P 75.0 P 74.0 P 73.5
P 76.1
P 75.0
P 74.5
P 74.0
P 73.5
P 73.0
P 72.0
P 72.0 P 72.3 P 72.6 P 72.9 P 73.2 P 73.5 P 73.5 P 74.5 P 75.5 P 76.0 P 76.0 P 77.0 P 76.5 P 76.0 P 75.5 P 76.0 P 76.0
P 75.5
P 75.5
P 74.5
P 73.5
P 72.5
P 71.5P 71.0
P 72.0
P 73.0
P 74.0 P 74.0
P 75.0 P 75.0 P 75.0
P 76.5 P 76.5 P 76.0P 76.0P 76.0
P 75.0
P 74.0
P 74.0
P 75.0
P 75.0
P 74.5P 73.5
P 72.7
P 72.7
P 73.0
P 73.5
P 74.0
P 73.5
P 73.0
P 73.5P 73.0
P 74.0
P 73.0
P 72.3 P 72.6 P 72.9 P 73.2
P 73.0
P 73.5
PARCEL I PARCEL J
PARCEL E PARCEL H
PARCEL L
PARCEL M
PARCEL K
PARCEL F PARCEL G
HONEYNUT STREETHONEYNUT STREET
EARTHWORK SUMMARY
DESCRIPTION CUT FILL
H:\3705\ACAD\PDP\C4.0-PRELIMINARY GRADING.DWG
PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN
VINEYARD CROSSING
CITY OF ANTIOCH CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA SCALE: 1" = 50'DATE: JUNE 2023
150100500 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS
SAN RAMON
WWW.CBANDG.COM
ROSEVILLE
(925) 866-0322
(916) 788-4456
OF SHEETS
SHEET NO.
7 C4.0
PRELIMINARY GRADING
A5
OAKLEY ROAD
PHILLIPS LANE
12345
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
2425
26 27
28 29
30 3132
33 34
35 36
37 38
39 40 41 42
4344
45 46 47
48 49 50 51 52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
6061
62 63
6465
66 67 68
697071
HONEYNUTSTREET
PARCEL A
(AMENITY)
PARCEL B
(WATER QUALITY)
PARCEL C
PARCEL D
(WATER QUALITY)
PARCEL E PARCEL H
PARCEL M
PARCEL K
PARCEL F PARCEL G
TSM 61.9
TSM 65.0
H:\3705\ACAD\PDP\C5.0-PRELIMINARY UTILITY.DWG
PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN
VINEYARD CROSSING
CITY OF ANTIOCH CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA SCALE: 1" = 50'DATE: JUNE 2023
150100500 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS
SAN RAMON
WWW.CBANDG.COM
ROSEVILLE
(925) 866-0322
(916) 788-4456
OF SHEETS
SHEET NO.
7 H:\3705\ACAD\PDP\C5.0-PRELIMINARY UTILITY.DWG
PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN
VINEYARD CROSSING
CITY OF ANTIOCH CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA SCALE: 1" = 50'DATE: JUNE 2023
150100500 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS
SAN RAMON
WWW.CBANDG.COM
ROSEVILLE
(925) 866-0322
(916) 788-4456
OF SHEETS
SHEET NO.
7 C5.0
PRELIMINARY UTILITY
A6
12345
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
2425
26 27
28 29
30 3132
33 34
35 36
37 38
39 40 41 42
4344
45 46 47
48 49 50 51 52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
6061
62 63
6465
66 67 68
697071
OAKLEY ROAD
PHILLIPS LANE
PARCEL A
(AMENITY)
PARCEL B
(WATER QUALITY)
PARCEL C
PARCEL D
(WATER QUALITY)
PARCEL I PARCEL J
PARCEL E PARCEL H
PARCEL L
PARCEL M
PARCEL K
PARCEL F PARCEL G
DMA 1
IMP 2
DMA 2
IMP 1
HONEYNUT STREET
PARCEL N PARCEL O
PARCEL P
C6.0
SWCP
DRAINAGE
MANAGEMENT
AREA (DMA)
IMPERVIOUS AREA TOTAL
PERVIOUS
(SF)
TOTAL
DRAINAGE
AREA
(SF)
REQUIRED
TREATMENT
AREA
(SF)
PROVIDED
TREATMENT
AREA
(SF)
TREATMENT
TYPEPAVEMENT
(SF)
ROOF
(SF)
TOTAL
(SF)
H:\3705\ACAD\PDP\C6.0-PRELIMINARY STORMWATER CONTROL PLAN.DWG
PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN
VINEYARD CROSSING
CITY OF ANTIOCH CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA SCALE: 1" = 50'DATE: JUNE 2023
150100500 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS
SAN RAMON
WWW.CBANDG.COM
ROSEVILLE
(925) 866-0322
(916) 788-4456
OF SHEETS
SHEET NO.
7 A7
SDK ATELIER INC. | Architecture + Planning
9100 Irvine Center Drive, IRVINE, California 92618
Tel:949.585.9167 Web:SDKatelier.com
Copyright 2023 SDK ATELIER INC.
JOB # : 132-23130
DATE: MAY 3RD 2023
RECREATION CENTER AND LEASING OFFICE
ANTIOCH, CALIFORNIA
ELEVATIONS STYLE
FARMHOUSE
FIRST FLOOR 2,462 S.F.
TOTAL 2,462 S.F.
VINEYARD CROSSINGVINEYARD CROSSING
A8
RECREATION
ROOM
19'-6" x 29'-0"
UNISEX
BATHLEASING
OFFICE
12'-10" x 21'-0"
WOMEN MEN
POOL
EQUIPMENT
8'-10" x 18'-10"
KITCHEN
8'-6" x 15'-0"
MAINTANENCE
GARAGE
12'-3" x 10'-3"
COVERED
PATIO
22'-6" x 24'-0"
STORAGE
8'-0" X 8'-0" O.H. GARAGE DOOR
BREEZEWAY
2040 FX
3040 FX
3080LOUVERED 3080LOUVERED 3080LOUVERED3080
LOUVERED
3080
LOUVERED 3080
3080
3040 FX
3080
12080 SL. GLS. DR.
ELECT.
FIRE
RISER
SHOWER
ADA
SHOWER
DRINKING
FOUNTAIN
2060 FX
2060 FX
3660 METAL
GATE
W/H
2868 DR.
2060 FX
2060 FX
3080 FR DR PAIR
3080 FR DR PAIR
5056 FSL
WORKSHOP
STORAGE
11'-10" x 8'-8"
MANAGER'S
OFFICE
12'-10" x 8'-0"
STORAGE
5056 SL 5056 SL 5656 SL5056 SL
13'-0"
34'-7" 20'-5"
55'-0"
47'-0" 22'-6" 3'-0"
85'-6"
30'-0" 25'-0"
55'-0"
1'-0"
1'-0"
2'-0"
2'-0"
SDK ATELIER INC. | Architecture + Planning
9100 Irvine Center Drive, IRVINE, California 92618
Tel:949.585.9167 Web:SDKatelier.com
Copyright 2023 SDK ATELIER INC.
VINEYARD CROSSING
ANTIOCH, CALIFORNIA
JOB # : 132-23130
DATE: MAY 16TH 2023
F L O O R P L A N
R E C R E A T I O N B U I L D I N GA-01
02' 4'8'
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
PLAN
PROGRAM:
30' X 85.5' FOOTPRINT
RECREATION ROOM, LEASING OFFICE
POOL BATHS, POOL EQUIPMENT ROOM
FIRST FLOOR2,462 S.F.
TOTAL2,462 S.F.
A9
10'-1"
8'-0"
TOP PLT.
WINDOW
HEAD
FIN. FLR.
OVERALL BUILDING HEIGHT
23'-6" +/-
12'-1"
TOP PLT.
FIN. FLR.
SDK ATELIER INC. | Architecture + Planning
9100 Irvine Center Drive, IRVINE, California 92618
Tel:949.585.9167 Web:SDKatelier.com
Copyright 2023 SDK ATELIER INC.
VINEYARD CROSSING
ANTIOCH, CALIFORNIA
JOB # : 132-23130
DATE: MAY 16TH 2023
F R O N T E L E V A T I O N
R E C R E A T I O N B U I L D I N G02' 4'8'
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
A10
12'-1"
8'-0"
TOP PLT.
WINDOW
HEAD
FIN. FLR.
12'-1"
10'-0"
TOP PLT.
SOFFIT
FIN. FLR.
10'-1"
8'-0"
TOP PLT.
WINDOW
HEAD
FIN. FLR.
12'-1"
8'-0"
WINDOW
HEAD
FIN. FLR.
TOP PLT.
10'-1"
FIN. FLR.
TOP PLT.
8'-0"
SOFFIT
25'-1" +/-
SDK ATELIER INC. | Architecture + Planning
9100 Irvine Center Drive, IRVINE, California 92618
Tel:949.585.9167 Web:SDKatelier.com
Copyright 2023 SDK ATELIER INC.
VINEYARD CROSSING
ANTIOCH, CALIFORNIA
JOB # : 132-23130
DATE: MAY 16TH 2023
R E A R E L E V A T I O N
R I G H T E L E V A T I O N L E F T E L E V A T I O N R E C R E A T I O N B U I L D I N GA-03
02' 4'8'
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
A11
RIDGE
7:12
7:12
RIDGE
7:12
7:12
RIDGE
7:12
7:12
HIP
HIP
VALLEY
VALLEY
VALLEY
VALLEY
VALLEY
HIP HIP
RIDGE
RIDGE
7:12
7:12
7:12
7:12
7:12
RIDGE
7:12
7:12
VALLEY
VALLEY
7:12
7:12
7:12
7:12
7:12
7:12
7:12
7:12
7:12
7:12
7:12
7:12
7:12
7:12
7:12
VALLEY
VALLEY
SDK ATELIER INC. | Architecture + Planning
9100 Irvine Center Drive, IRVINE, California 92618
Tel:949.585.9167 Web:SDKatelier.com
Copyright 2023 SDK ATELIER INC.
VINEYARD CROSSING
ANTIOCH, CALIFORNIA
JOB # : 132-23130
DATE: MAY 16TH 2023
R E C R E A T I O N B U I L D I N G
R O O F P L A N
A-04
02' 4'8'
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
A12
Street Scene
3C | Craftsman 1C ADU | Crafts- 2A ADU | Transitional 1B ADU | Farmhouse1A | Transitional 2B | Farmhouse Note: Artist’s Conception; Colors, Materials
And Application May Var
y. 0.1.0
A13
Note: Artist’s Conception; Colors, Materials
And Application May Var
y.
Color Scheme FH7 Color Scheme CM1
Color Scheme TR4
A14
6050 SL
30 SC80
UP
16R
2468
2468
PANTRY
PWDR
9'-0" CLG.
H.S.
28 SC68
3050 SH
2868
2040 SH
16'-0" x 7'-0" SECT. GAR. DOOR
2 BAY
GARAGE
CONCRETE
COVERED
ENTRY
9'-0" CLG.
CONCRETE
TEMP. GL.
3050 SH
DINING
9'-0" CLG.
H.S.
TEMP. GL. SLIDER80 60
ENTRY
9'-0" CLG.
H.S.
KITCHEN
9'-0" CLG.
H.S.
GREAT
ROOM
9'-0" CLG.
H.S.
W/H
COATS
20'-11"5'-1"
45'-0"
26'-0"
45'-0"
20'-11" 6'-0" 18'-1"
12'-8"13'-4"
2'-0"24'-4"5'-0"
26'-0"
13'-8"
NOTE: SQUARE FOOTAGE MAY VARY DUE TO METHOD OF CALCULATION FLOOR AREA TABLE PLAN 1A
FIRST LEVEL 589 SQ. FT.
SECOND LEVEL 863 SQ. FT.
TOTAL 1452 SQ. FT.
2-BAY GARAGE 459 SQ. FT.
COVERED ENTRY 25 SQ. FT.
DWELLING PLAN SUMMARY - PLAN 1
ROOM TYPE QUANTITY
BEDROOM(S) 3
BATH(S) 2.5
C HS
DN
16R
PR. 1668
LVR. BI-FOLDC HS
3080
2468
3068
2650 SH 2650 SH
BATH 2
8'-0" CLG.
H.S.
2668
2668
2468
5068 BI-PASS 5068 BI-PASS
2050 SH
4050 SL
3050 SH
2050 SH 5040 SL
PRIMARY
BATH
8'-0" CLG.
H.S.
W.I.C.
8'-0" CLG.
CARPET
PRIMARY
BDRM.
8'-0" CLG.
CARPET
5050 SL
BDRM 2
8'-0" CLG.
CARPET
LINEN
C HS
C HS
C HSFX2650
SERV.
8'-0" CLG.
H.S.
BDRM 3
8'-0" CLG.
CARPET
2050 SH
1636 SH
26'-0"
5'-1"
40'-0"
26'-0"
40'-0"
3'-51
2"
16'-1"23'-11"
7'-31
2" 15'-3"
11'-10" 2'-0" 12'-10" 12'-4"
8'-10"12'-1"
1'-0"
1.2.0 PLAN 1A
VINEYARD CROSSING
ANTIOCH, CA
| 2022362 | 06-09-23C 2020 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA.
CONCEPTUAL
Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"
0 2 4 8 16
First Level Floor PlanSecond Level Floor Plan
A15
A16
A17
A18
6:12
RIDGE
1'-0"
6:12
1'-0"
4:12
6:12
6:12
6:12
6:12
6:12
6:12
RIDGE
VALLEY
VALLEY
RIDGE
6:12
HIP
HIP
HIP
HIP
HIP
HIP
6:12
RIDGE
1'-0"
6:12
1'-0"
4:12
6:12
6:12
RIDGE
VALLEY
R
6:12
4:12
6:12
4:12
HIP
HIP
4:12
RIDGE
1'-0"
4:12
1'-0"
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
RIDGE
VALLEY
VALLEY
RIDGE
4:12
HIP
HIP
HIP
HIP
HIP
HIP
4:12
PLAN 1
Roof Plans
1B | Farmhouse1A | Transitional 1C | Craftsman
Eave 12" / Rake 12" Eave 12" / Rake 12" Eave 12" / Rake 12"
VINEYARD CROSSING
ANTIOCH, CA
| 2022362 | 06-09-23C 2020 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA.
CONCEPTUAL
Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"
0 2 4 8 16
1.8.0 A19
Note: Artist’s Conception; Colors, Materials
And Application May Var
y.
Color Scheme FH8 Color Scheme CM2
Color Scheme TR5
A20
30 SC80
UP
16R
2468
28 SC68
3050 SH
2868
16'-0" x 7'-0" SECT. GAR. DOOR
2 BAY
GARAGE
CONCRETE
TEMP. GL.
3050 SH
COATS
2468
3050 SH
TEMP. GL. SLIDER80 80
ENTRY
9'-0" CLG.
H.S.
PWDR.
9'-0" CLG.
H.S.
KITCHEN
9'-0" CLG.
H.S.
DINING
9'-0" CLG.
H.S.
GREAT
ROOM
9'-0" CLG.
H.S.
W/H
8050 XOX
COVERED
ENTRY
9'-0" CLG.
CONCRETE
26'-0"
47'-0"
26'-0"
47'-0"
13'-0"13'-0"
3'-6"25'-8"7'-61
2"
4'-11" 21'-1"
23'-1" 3'-91
2" 20'-11
2"
10'-31
2"
NOTE: SQUARE FOOTAGE MAY VARY DUE TO METHOD OF CALCULATION FLOOR AREA TABLE PLAN 2A
FIRST LEVEL 616 SQ. FT.
SECOND LEVEL 1043 SQ. FT.
TOTAL 1659 SQ. FT.
2-BAY GARAGE 473 SQ. FT.
COVERED ENTRY 37 SQ. FT.
DWELLING PLAN SUMMARY - PLAN 2A
ROOM TYPE QUANTITY
BEDROOM(S) 3
BATH(S) 2.5
C HS
PRIMARY
BATH
8'-0" CLG.
H.S.
DN
16R
2468
C HS
2468
2468
3068
C HS
TEMP. GL.
3050 SH
2668
2668
3068
PR. 1668
LVR. BI-FOLD
C HS
LINEN
6050 SL3050 SH
2050 SH2050 SH
W.I.C.
8'-0" CLG.
CARPET
PRIMARY
BDRM.
8'-0" CLG.
CARPET
BATH 2
8'-0" CLG.
H.S.
BDRM 3
8'-0" CLG.
CARPET 2468
2468
BDRM 2
8'-0" CLG.
CARPET
W.I.C.
8'-0" CLG.
CARPET
W.I.C.
8'-0" CLG.
CARPET
SERV.
8'-0" CLG.
H.S.
LOFT/
OPT. BD.4
8'-0" CLG.
CARPET
5050 SL
2050 SH2050 SH3050 SH
2050 SH
TEMP. GL.
2040 SH
8050 XOX
TEMP. GL.
2040 SH
(AGING-IN-PLACE)
(AGING-IN-PLACE)
2668
OPT.
5068 BI-PASSOPT.
4050 SL
26'-0"
26'-0"
44'-6"
5'-3" 10'-9" 14'-8" 12'-10"
10'-4"15'-8"
44'-6"
33'-21
2"11'-31
2"
7'-6"
1'-0"
13'-7"4'-11"
3068
5050 SL
2050 SH
TEMP. GL.
2050 SH
BDRM 4
8'-0" CLG.
CARPET
2668
5068 BI-PASS
12'-10"
10'-4"
2.2.0 PLAN 2A
VINEYARD CROSSING
ANTIOCH, CA
| 2022362 | 06-09-23C 2020 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA.
CONCEPTUAL
Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"
0 2 4 8 16
First Level Floor PlanSecond Level Floor Plan
Opt. Bedroom 4
A21
A22
A23
A24
6:12
RIDGE
6:12
6:12
6:12
6:12
RIDGE
R
1'-0"
1'-0"
6:12
RIDGE
6:12
6:12
6:12
6:12
6:12
6:12
RIDGE
HIP
VALLEY
HIP
HIP
HIP
1'-0"
1'-0"
4:12
RIDGE
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
RIDGE
HIP
VALLEY
HIP
HIP
HIP
1'-0"
1'-0"
PLAN 2
Roof Plans
2B | Farmhouse2A | Transitional 2C | Craftsman
Eave 12" / Rake 12" Eave 12" / Rake 12" Eave 12" / Rake 12"
VINEYARD CROSSING
ANTIOCH, CA
| 2022362 | 06-09-23C 2020 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA.
CONCEPTUAL
Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"
0 2 4 8 16
2.8.0 A25
Note: Artist’s Conception; Colors, Materials
And Application May V
ary.
Color Scheme FH9 Color Scheme CM3
Color Scheme TR6
A26
DINING
9'-0" CLG.
H.S.
30 SC80
TEMP. GL. SLIDER8060
4040 SL
UP
16R
2468
PANTRY
3050 SH
2868
16'-0" x 7'-0" SECT. GAR. DOOR
2 BAY
GARAGE
CONCRETE
TEMP. GL.
3050 SH
2468
28 SC
68 6050 SL
PWDR.
7'-4" CLG.
H.S.
3050 SH
5050 SH
COATS
ENTRY
9'-0" CLG.
H.S.
KITCHEN
9'-0" CLG.
H.S.
GREAT
ROOM
9'-0" CLG.
H.S.
W/H
COVERED
ENTRY
9'-0" CLG.
CONCRETE
C HS
26'-0"
26'-0"
47'-0"
4'-11" 21'-1"
20'-11" 20'-11"
10'-4"15'-8"
2'-2"28'-0"11'-10" 5'-0"
47'-0"
5'-2"
NOTE: SQUARE FOOTAGE MAY VARY DUE TO METHOD OF CALCULATION FLOOR AREA TABLE PLAN 3A
FIRST LEVEL 641 SQ. FT.
SECOND LEVEL 1056 SQ. FT.
TOTAL 1697 SQ. FT.
2-BAY GARAGE 465 SQ. FT.
COVERED ENTRY 25 SQ. FT.
DWELLING PLAN SUMMARY - PLAN 3A
ROOM TYPE QUANTITY
BEDROOM(S) 3
BATH(S) 2.5
BDRM 2
8'-0" CLG.
CARPET
DN
16R
LINEN
3050 SH OPT.
PR. 1668
LVR. BI-FOLD
SERV.
8'-0" CLG.
H.S.
2668
4050 SL
LINEN
3068
BDRM 3
8'-0" CLG.
CARPET
2668
5068 BI-PASS
5068 BI-PASS
3068
2468
BATH 2
8'-0" CLG.
H.S.
3068
2050 SH
2050 SH
2668
2468
W.I.C.
8'-0" CLG.
CARPET
PRIMARY
BATH
8'-0" CLG.
H.S.
2050 SH 2050 SH
3050 SH3050 SH 3050 SH
2640 SH
PRIMARY
BDRM.
8'-0" CLG.
CARPET
2650 SH
5050 SL
2650 SH
2050 SH
8050 XOX
6850 BI-PASSOPT.
(AGING-IN-PLACE)
(AGING-IN-PLACE)
LOFT/
OPT. BD.4
8'-0" CLG.
CARPET
C HS
C HS
C HS
1036 SH
47'-0"
26'-0"
47'-0"
4'-11"
11'-5" 2'-0"
12'-7"
6'-5" 14'-3"
14'-0"
5'-10"
12'-0"
28'-0"15'-0" 2'-2"
26'-0"
8'-6"
1'-10"
7'-1"
2668
BDRM 4
8'-0" CLG.
CARPET
5050 SL
2050 SH
2668
5068 BI-PASS
2'-2"11'-0"2'-0"
12'-0"
3.2.0 PLAN 3A
VINEYARD CROSSING
ANTIOCH, CA
| 2022362 | 06-09-23C 2020 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA.
CONCEPTUAL
Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"
0 2 4 8 16
First Level Floor PlanSecond Level Floor Plan
Opt. Bedroom 4
A27
A28
A29
A30
1'-0"
1'-0"
6:12
RIDGE
6:12
RIDGE
RIDGE
VALLEY
VALLEY
R
VALLEY
VALLEY
6:12
6:12
6:12
6:12
6:12
6:12
4:12
1'-0"
1'-0"
6:12
RIDGE
6:12
RIDGE
RIDGE
VALLEY
VALLEY
R
VALLEY
VALLEY
6:12
6:12
6:12
6:12
6:12
6:12
1'-0"
1'-0"
4:12
RIDGE
4:12
RIDGE
RIDGE
VALLEY
R
HIP
VALLEY
4:12
HIP
HIP
HIP
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
PLAN 3
Roof Plans
3B | Farmhouse3A | Transitional 3C | Craftsman
Eave 12" / Rake 12" Eave 12" / Rake 12" Eave 12" / Rake 12"
VINEYARD CROSSING
ANTIOCH, CA
| 2022362 | 06-09-23C 2020 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA.
CONCEPTUAL
Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"
0 2 4 8 16
3.8.0 A31
Note: Artist’s Conception; Colors, Materials
And Application May V
ary.
Color Scheme FH7 Color Scheme CM1
Color Scheme TR4
A32
3080
2680
2480
LINEN PR. 1668
LVR. BI-FOLD
PANTRY
W/H
6080 BI-PASS
5050 SL
2050 SH 2050 SH
3050 SH5050 SL
5050 SL
3040 SH
2468
LOUVER
ENTRY
9'-0" CLG.
H.S.
KITCHEN
9'-0" CLG.
H.S.
DINING
9'-0" CLG.
H.S.
LIVING
9'-0" CLG.
H.S.
PRIMARY
BATH
9'-0" CLG.
H.S.
PRIMARY
BDRM.
9'-0" CLG.
H.S.
SERV.
9'-0" CLG.
H.S.
16'-0"
38'-0"
11'-2"
1'-0" 25'-1" 11'-11"
16'-0"
12'-11"3'-1"
38'-0"
3'-7"8'-4"5'-0"21'-1"
3'-8" 1'-2"
NOTE: SQUARE FOOTAGE MAY VARY DUE TO METHOD OF CALCULATION FLOOR AREA TABLE A.D.U. - PLAN 1A
FIRST LEVEL 603 SQ. FT.
TOTAL 603 SQ. FT.
COVERED ENTRY 5 SQ. FT.
DWELLING PLAN SUMMARY - A.D.U. PLAN 1A
ROOM TYPE QUANTITY
BEDROOM(S) 1
BATH(S) 1
6:12
RIDGE
1'-0"
6:12
1'-0"
4:12
4.2.0 A.D.U. PLAN 1
VINEYARD CROSSING
ANTIOCH, CA
| 2022362 | 06-09-23C 2020 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA.
CONCEPTUAL
Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"
0 2 4 8 16
Floor PlanRoof Plan
A33
A34
A35
A36
Note: Artist’s Conception; Colors, Materials
And Application May V
ary.
Color Scheme FH8 Color Scheme CM2
Color Scheme TR5
A37
W/H
36X40
PR. 1668 LVR.
BI-FOLD
2668
2468
PANTRY
2468
3080
LINEN
5080 BI-PASS
2468
5050 SL
5050 SL
2680
2050 SH 2050 SH
2040 SH
3050 SH 3050 SH3050 SH
5050 SL
3040 SH
LVR.
2068
2068
ENTRY
9'-0" CLG.
H.S.
KITCHEN
9'-0" CLG.
H.S.
DINING
9'-0" CLG.
H.S. LIVING
9'-0" CLG.
H.S.
PRIMARY
BATH
9'-0" CLG.
H.S.
W.I.C.
9'-0" CLG.
CARPET
PRIMARY
BDRM.
9'-0" CLG.
H.S.
BATH 2
9'-0" CLG.
H.S.
BDRM 2
9'-0" CLG.
H.S.
SERV.
9'-0" CLG.
H.S.
47'-2"
16'-0"
1'-4" 3'-8" 11'-0"
17'-5" 3'-3" 3'-4" 10'-7" 7'-8" 4'-11"
16'-0"
5'-7"10'-5"
47'-2"
12'-7"33'-7"1'-0"
FLOOR AREA TABLE A.D.U. - PLAN 2A
FIRST LEVEL 750 SQ. FT.
TOTAL 750 SQ. FT.
COVERED ENTRY 5 SQ. FT.
DWELLING PLAN SUMMARY - A.D.U. - PLAN 2A
ROOM TYPE QUANTITY
BEDROOM(S) 2
BATH(S) 2
NOTE: SQUARE FOOTAGE MAY VARY DUE TO METHOD OF CALCULATION 6:12
RIDGE
1'-0"
6:12
1'-0"
5.2.0 A.D.U. PLAN 2
VINEYARD CROSSING
ANTIOCH, CA
| 2022362 | 06-09-23C 2020 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA.
CONCEPTUAL
Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"
0 2 4 8 16
Floor PlanRoof Plan
A38
A39
A40
A41
A42
A43
A44
A45
A46
A47
A48
1 June 13, 2023
Zoe Merideth
Senior Planner
City of Antioch
200 H Street
Antioch, CA 94509
VIA EMAIL AND DELIVERED HARD COPY
Re: Vineyard Crossing PDP Application (3001 Oakley Road)
Dear Ms. Meredith:
BrightSky Residential is proposing the Vineyard Crossing project , which involves subdivision of the project site into 71 lots and associated streets. The proposed single family lots are in conformance with the general plan, and entitlement of the project requests approval of a vesting tentative map, final development plan, and planned development rezone to permit the development. The development is on two parcels separated by a Pacific Gas & Electric owned utility easement . The west parcel is approximately 10.2 acres in size and the east parcel is approximately 4.7 acres in size.
The utility easement bifurcating the project site will remain undeveloped other than a connecting street and footpath.
BrightSky Residential will retain ownership of all the proposed homes within Vineyard Crossing to manage the homes as a purpose-built single-family rental community. The homes will be best-in-class, generously amenitized rental homes with onsite management providing maintenance-free living to the residents.
BrightSky Residential is proposing three new house plans ranging in size from 1,492 sq. ft. to 1,6970 sq. ft., with 3 complimentary elevations each – farmhouse, transitional, and craftsman. Additionally, beyond the traditional construction of Single -Family Residences (SFRs), BrightSky is proposing two new Accessory Dwelling Units, (ADUs) ranging in size from 603 sq. ft. to 750 sq. ft., with three elevations matching the SFRs. ADUs are a unique opportunity to address a variety of housing needs and provide housing options for a broad spectrum of people.
These homes were designed to respond to the current market demands yet offer the long -term quality necessary for homes to stand the test of time. The homes are all on larger lots; the lot sizes ranging from 4,125 to 7,246 square feet.
BrightSky has designed the new homes to complement each other and provide a harmonious street scene that complements the surrounding developments yet retains distinct individual character. The exterior materials of these styles are stucco and siding bodies with metal and siding accents, based
ATTACHMENT B
B1
2 on architectural styles. Additional detailing and enhanced articulation of the individual homes, such as asymmetrical massing and gables, metal awnings and standing seam metal roofing, complete the elevations. All elevations have concrete roof tile, and gr eat attention was paid to high -end finishes throughout. The homes feature three different color palettes for each elevation style.
To enhance the residents day -to-day living, each proposed home provides many included features.
Each house plan provides a unique interior layout with standard amenities for the resident.
Access to the proposed private streets within the project will be from Phillips Lane and Oakley Road.
The private streets will be 47’ wide with parking on both sides and 43’ wide with parking on one side.
The homes feature fully landscaped front and backyards. The front yards, which BrightSky will maintain, feature street and accent trees, a dense variety of drought tolerant and adapted ornamental shrubs and groundcovers, and hardscape walking paths. The backyards feature hardscape, ground cover, and drought tolerant and adapted ornamental shrubs.
Thank you for your consideration of this application. We look forward to continuing to work with you to bring this project to fruition.
My Best,
Reggie Decker
B2
VINEYARD CROSSING CONSISTENCY CHECKLIST
SINGLE FAMILY OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS
DOCUMENT POLICY DISCUSSION
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.1.1.A Orientation to
Street
The main elevation of single-family
homes shall face the primary public or
private street on which the lot is
located. In addition, the main entry to
single-family homes shall also be
located on the elevation facing the
primary public or private street.
In all proposed designs, the main
elevation and entry face the
primary neighborhood street.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.1.1.B Access to
Main Entry
A minimum four-foot-wide pedestrian
walkway, other than the driveway,
shall provide direct access from the
sidewalk to the main entry.
Future plans will need to show
compliance with Standard
3.1.1.B.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.1.1.C Driveway
Centerline
Driveways shall include a decorative
element at least one-foot wide
composed of pavers, colored
concrete, aggregate, brick banding or
other decorative treatment to break up
uninterrupted concrete surfaces to no
more than 12-foot wide sections.
Future plans will need to show
compliance with Standard
3.1.1.C.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.1.2.A Off-parallel
window placement
Upper-floor windows facing dwellings
within 15 feet of the property line shall
be offset by a minimum of twelve
inches, as measured from the window
frame, from the adjacent property
window frame to avoid direct view into
adjacent properties.
Future plans will need to show
compliance with Standard
3.1.2.A.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.1.2.B Daylight Plane
Standard
No portion of the building volume shall
encroach into a daylight plane starting
at a point that is 28 feet above the
property line abutting any adjacent lot
with an existing single-family or
multifamily residential use of two
stories or less and sloping upward at a
45-degree angle toward the interior of
the lot.
Future plans will need to show
compliance with Standard
3.1.2.B.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.2.1.A Front
Elevation Massing
Building elevations on which the main
entry is located shall include at least
two of the following massing
strategies, compliant with the
associated standards:
Single Floor Projection: A façade
projection on the lower or upper floor
that projects project at least one foot
from the main wall plane, with a total
The plans included in the
preliminary development plan
submittal comply with Standard
3.2.1.A.
ATTACHMENT C
C1
area of at least 80 feet and capped by
a gable, eave or other roof form.
Multi-Floor Projection: A façade
projection extending from ground level
to the upper floor ceiling that projects
at least one foot from the main wall
plane, with a total area of at least 124
feet, and capped by a gable or other
roof form. Multi-floor projections shall
comply with the standards in Section
3.3.1.1.2 Separation of Floors.
Massing Break: A break in the main
wall plane of at least two feet that
extends from ground level to the upper
floor ceiling. The break shall be
located so as to separate primary
façade elements such as entries and
garages, and picture windows.
Bay Window: A protruding window,
such as a bay window, which is at
least two feet in depth.
Second Floor Stepback: A minimum
two-foot, street-facing stepback
applied to the second floor. The
setback shall span at least 60% of the
total street-facing building elevation
and shall be covered with an eave or
roof component that matches the
primary roof form of the building.
Contrasting Materials or Finish on
Floors: Application of siding, panels
or materials that vary from the primary
exterior finish, to at least 40% of the
total elevation area of one story of the
building. All materials shall comply
with standards in Section 3.2.4 Design
Detail.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.2.2.A Porch or
Recess Requirement
Main entryways shall incorporate a
porch, recessed entryway, or a
combination of porch and recessed
entryway.
The plans included in the
preliminary development plan
submittal comply with Standard
3.2.2.A.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.2.2.C Recessed
Entry Standards
Recessed entryways shall comply with
the following:
Depth. Recessed entries shall be
recessed at least two feet from the
The plans included in the
preliminary development plan
submittal comply with Standard
3.2.2.C.
C2
wall plane on which the door is located
to create a covered landing area.
Overhang. Recessed entries shall
include an eave or roof form at least
six feet wide that extends at least two
feet from the main wall plane.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.2.3.A Design
Sensitive Approach
All garages shall be designed and
located to limit their visual presence,
using one of the following techniques:
Design sensitive front garage.
Garages located at the front building
elevation shall comply with the
following standards:
The width shall not exceed 60 percent
of the total width of the front elevation
of the building.
The garage shall be prohibited from
projecting from the surrounding wall
plane.
The garage shall include either 1) an
overhang at least 12 inches deep with
the same materials and color palette
as the primary roof form,
or 2) a recess of at least 12 inches
from the surrounding wall plane.
Side accessible attached garage.
Such garages shall be located a
minimum of 12 feet behind the main
elevation of the home.
Detached or attached rear garage.
Such garages
shall be located at the rear of
residential lots and be made
accessible from a side lot driveway or
from the rear.
Future plans will need to show
compliance with Standard
3.2.3.A.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.2.3.B
Complementary
Garage Door Design
The color and design of all garage
doors shall vary from the immediately
adjacent wall plane and shall match
colors used on exterior details of the
home.
The plans included in the
preliminary development plan
submittal comply with Standard
3.2.3.B.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.2.4.A Material Mix
Up to four materials and four finishes
may be used consistently on each
building facade.
The plans included in the
preliminary development plan
submittal comply with Standard
3.2.4.A.
C3
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.2.4.B Appropriate
Building Materials
Materials used on building finishes
shall be high quality and durable.
Appropriate building materials include:
» Brick, rock, and stone, or a veneer of
these materials
» Smooth troweled stucco
» Poured in place concrete
» Cementitious board
» Glass
» Plaster or stucco
» Ceramic tiles (as a secondary
material)
» Slate tiles
» Stainless Steel
» Finished and painted wood trim
» Wood, aluminum, copper, steel, and
vinyl clad frames for windows and
doors
The plans included in the
preliminary development plan
submittal comply with Standard
3.2.4.B.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.2.4.C Prohibited
Materials
The following materials shall be
prohibited from use on
finishes:
» Porous materials
» Plywood
» Vinyl siding
» Faux materials such as foam
material that
replicates “stone” or “brick.”
» Plastic or vinyl
The plans included in the
preliminary development plan
submittal comply with Standard
3.2.4.C.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.2.4.D Exterior
Material Wrapping
Decorative material and design
treatments used on front elevations
shall extend to the fence line on each
side elevation, at a minimum
Future plans will need to show
compliance with Standard
3.2.4.D.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.2.4.E Limit
The number of colors on the entire
building exterior shall be limited to a
maximum of five colors (or five tones
of the same color), including trim and
accent colors.
The plans included in the
preliminary development plan
submittal comply with Standard
3.2.4.E.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.2.4.F Functional
Elements
All vents, gutters, downspouts,
flashings, electrical conduits, etc.,
shall be painted to match the color of
the adjacent surface. Exception made
be made for contrasting gutters and
downspouts that are a feature of
Spanish-style architecture.
Future plans will need to show
compliance with Standard
3.2.4.F.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
All windows shall include one of the
following perimeter design details:
The plans included in the
preliminary development plan
C4
3.2.5.A Window
Perimeter
» Trim at least two inches wide around
the entire window.
» A minimum two-inch recess from the
surrounding exterior wall plane.
submittal comply with Standard
3.2.5.A.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.2.5.B Front Window
Detail
Windows located on front building
façades shall be articulated with at
least one of the following details, in
addition to trim requirements in
Standard 3.3.5.1.1:
» Sills
» Kickers
» Functional shutters
» Awnings
The plans included in the
preliminary development plan
submittal comply with Standard
3.2.5.B.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.2.5.C Side Elevation
Offset
Windows on the side elevations of
two-story buildings shall be staggered
horizontally by a minimum of six
inches from center, between floors.
Future plans will need to show
compliance with Standard
3.2.5.C.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.2.6.A Street
Fronting Roofline
Roof surfaces that face front property
lines and are wider than 30 feet shall
be vertically articulated at least once
every 30 feet, with at least one of the
following techniques:
» A change in height of at least four
feet
» A roof dormer
» A change in roof orientation
» A change in roof form that projects
at least three feet above the main
roofline.
The plans included in the
preliminary development plan
submittal comply with Standard
3.2.6.A.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.2.6.B Restricted
Roof Forms
Superficial roof forms, such as
“mansards,” affixed to
the building are prohibited.
The plans included in the
preliminary development plan
submittal comply with Standard
3.2.6.B.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.3.1.A Required
Coverage
All portions of required front yards,
except those occupied by walkways
and allowable motor vehicle parking
and storage areas, shall be
landscaped according to the following
standards:
At least 75 percent organic plant
material, including grasses, trees and
shrubs; and
No more than 25 percent inorganic
ground cover, including decomposed
granite, decorative pavers and river
rock.
The plans included in the
preliminary development plan
submittal comply with Standard
3.3.1.A.
C5
Gravel surfaces are prohibited in all
front yard areas except for secondary
pathways less than 4’ wide.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.3.1.B Design
Diversity
A variety of heights, textures, and
colors shall be used in the front yard
landscape palette.
The plans included in the
preliminary development plan
submittal comply with Standard
3.3.1.B.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.3.1.C Utility
Screening
All utility appurtenances such as
transformers and generators that
cannot be undergrounded or located in
side or rear yards shall be screened
with one of the following:
Dense, U-shaped shrubs or plantings
at least as tall as the utility and that do
not prevent access to the utility.
Architectural structures composed of
at least one material used on the
home and that do not prevent access
to the utility.
Future plans will need to show
compliance with Standard
3.3.1.C. Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.3.2.A Planting Size
All proposed shrubs except accent,
color or ground cover planting shall be
a minimum five-gallon size.
Future plans will need to show
compliance with Standard
3.3.2.A.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.3.2.B Tree
Protection
No irrigated landscape area shall be
permitted within a 10-foot radius
around a landmark or heritage tree
with a trunk diameter of 48 inches
and/or in excess of 40 feet above
natural grade in height.
The plans included in the
preliminary development plan
submittal comply with Standard
3.3.2.B.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.3.2.C Automatic
Sprinkler Controllers
Automatic irrigation controllers shall be
installed to ensure that landscaped
areas will be watered properly.
Backflow preventors and anti-siphon
valves shall be provided in accordance
with current codes.
Future plans will need to show
compliance with Standard
3.3.2.C.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.3.2.D Sprinkler
Heads
Sprinkler heads and risers shall be
protected from car bumpers. “Pop-up”
heads shall be used near curbs and
sidewalks. The landscape irrigation
system shall be designed to prevent
run-off and overspray.
Future plans will need to show
compliance with Standard
3.3.2.D.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.3.3.A Open Fencing
Fences in the required front yard
setback parallel to the street shall not
be solid or opaque. Fences shall have
a partially open design characterized
by boards or slats spaced no more
Future plans will need to show
compliance with Standard
3.3.3.A.
C6
than four inches apart, lattice, posts,
or other visually penetrable design
strategy. Fences behind the front
elevation of the house may be solid.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.3.3.B Prohibited
Materials
Chain link and barbed wire are
prohibited from use for all residential
fencing. Exceptions for chain link
fencing may be made for the following:
Fencing not visible from streets
adjacent to the property; chain link
with integrated slats of wood or vinyl;
and gates at entries into side yards.
The plans included in the
preliminary development plan
submittal comply with Standard
3.3.3.B.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.3.3.C Trash Storage
Enclosure
Single family lots shall include a
location for the storage of trash
receptacles (waste wheelers, etc.)
which is screened from public view by
a fence or architectural enclosure that
includes at least one material or color
found on the primary residential
structure.
Future plans will need to show
compliance with Standard
3.3.3.C.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.3.3.D Trash Storage
Access
All trash storage enclosures shall be
made accessible by a minimum three-
foot wide paved pathway from the
enclosure to the front driveway or
other paved area of the front yard.
Future plans will need to show
compliance with Standard
3.3.3.D.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.3.4.A Downward
Facing Requirement
All building- and ground-mounted
lighting shall be located and fully
shielded so that no light is emitted
above a 90-degree angle.
Future plans will need to show
compliance with Standard
3.3.4.A.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.3.4.B Entryway
Illumination
The front porch, landing or other
recessed entryway shall include a
lighting element consistent with the
design, materials and/or color of the
home.
Future plans will need to show
compliance with Standard
3.3.4.B.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.3.4.C Ground-
Mounted Lighting
Ground-mounted lighting to illuminate
driveway edges, landscaped areas or
stair approaches shall be limited to
three feet tall.
Future plans will need to show
compliance with Standard
3.3.4.C.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.3.4.D Inappropriate
Lighting
No permanently installed outdoor
lights that blink, revolve, flash, or
change intensity shall be permitted.
Future plans will need to show
compliance with Standard
3.3.4.D.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.6.1.A Entry Drive
Design
The Arterials Entry Drive shall be
distinguished through the use of at
least two of the following design
elements:
Future plans will need to show
compliance with Standard
3.6.1.A.
C7
Two- to three--foot tall architectural
monument sign composed of stone,
brick, wood, or other natural materials.
Monument signs shall include a solid
base at least eighteen (18) inches in
height.
» Textured, colored or stamped
roadway paving from the
neighborhood property line to the first
interior intersection.
» Public art or water feature with
integrated neighborhood signage.
» Minimum four-foot-wide landscaped
median with integrated signage from
the neighborhood property line to the
first interior intersection.
» Special landscaping on both sides of
the entry drive that includes both
specimen trees and larger background
trees.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.6.1.B Entry Drive
Lighting
Shielded street lighting on poles 10 to
20 feet high shall be provided on at
least one side of the Arterial Entry
Drive, extending from the
neighborhood property line to the first
interior intersection.
Future plans will need to show
compliance with Standard
3.6.1.B.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.6.1.C Perimeter
Wall Design
Perimeter walls along arterials shall
incorporate one of the following design
variations at least every 40 feet in
length:
» Change in height of at least twenty
percent of the total wall height.
» Change in material, texture, or color.
» Break in the wall plane, including
projecting or recessed areas.
The plans included in the
preliminary development plan
submittal comply with Standard
3.6.1.C.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.6.1.D Perimeter
Wall Construction
All perimeter walls shall be of masonry
construction using brick or stone.
Precast or prefabricated perimeter
walls of any material shall be
prohibited.
The plans included in the
preliminary development plan
submittal comply with Standard
3.6.1.D.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.6.1.E Perimeter
Landscaping
Neighborhood perimeters shall
incorporate landscaping designs in
which plantings are paired with
perimeter walls. A combination of
grasses, ground covers and shrubs or
vines shall be planted no greater than
The plans included in the
preliminary development plan
submittal comply with Standard
3.6.1.E.
C8
two feet from the base of the perimeter
wall or fence.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.6.1.F Perimeter
Trees
Trees selected from the City of
Antioch Approved Street Tree List and
at least 15 gallons in size with a one-
inch diameter at breast height (dbh)
shall be planted a maximum of 30 feet
apart along neighborhood perimeters.
Future plans will need to show
compliance with Standard
3.6.1.F.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.6.2.A Dead Ends
Dead-end streets, with the exception
of cul-de-sacs, pedestrian pathways,
bicycle facilities and multi-modal
pathways shall be prohibited in
residential subdivisions.
The plans included in the
preliminary development plan
submittal comply with Standard
3.6.2.A.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.6.2.B Common
Spaces
All parks and common spaces shall be
directly accessible by at least one
street and one pedestrian pathway,
bicycle facility and/or multimodal
pathway.
Future plans will need to show
compliance with Standard
3.6.2.B.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.6.2.C External
Connectivity
New arterial and collector streets
within a subdivision or neighborhood
shall be aligned with surrounding
existing and planned streets to create
a continuous street pattern.
The plans included in the
preliminary development plan
submittal comply with Standard
3.6.2.C.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.6.2.D Cul-de-Sacs
The ends of all cul-de-sacs longer
than 500 feet shall include a
pedestrian connection to another
street, multi-modal pathway or
common open space.
The plans included in the
preliminary development plan
submittal comply with Standard
3.6.2.D.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.6.2.E Pedestrian
Pathway Design
Pedestrian pathways or sidewalks
shall be separated from streets by a
minimum four-foot-wide planted buffer
and incorporate canopy or shade trees
planted at least every 24 feet on
center.
Future plans will need to show
compliance with Standard
3.6.2.E.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.6.3.A “T”
Intersection
Restriction
Lots located at “T” intersections shall
be offset from the point of intersection,
such that driveway access, main
entries and line of sight are not
centered with the approaching right-of-
way.
Future plans will need to show
compliance with Standard
3.6.3.A.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.6.3.B Unit Design
Variation
Subdivisions with more than four units
shall include at least three models,
each with a distinct floor plan and
elevation design.
The plans included in the
preliminary development plan
submittal comply with Standard
3.6.3.B.
C9
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.6.3.C Adjacent
Building Design
No home shall be located adjacent to,
or across the street from, a home with
the with the same floor plan or building
elevation.
Future plans will need to show
compliance with Standard
3.6.3.C.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.6.3.D Corner Unit
Design
Units located on corner lots have shall
incorporate at least two of the
following design details
enhancements:
» Functional shutters on the street-
facing windows
» Wrap-around decorative horizontal
cladding
» Roof gables or other projections
Future plans will need to show
compliance with Standard
3.6.3.D.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.6.4.A Active Assets
Common open spaces shall facilitate
movement and exercise by including
at least three of the following active
recreation assets:
» Play Structures
» Exercise machines
» Fitness series
» Play Courts
» Swing sets
» Jogging path
» Dog play area
Future plans will need to show
compliance with Standard
3.6.4.A.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.6.4.B Passive
Assets
Common open spaces shall facilitate
outdoor relaxation and rest with at
least three of the following passive
recreation assets:
» Seating or benches
» Permanent picnic or game tables
» Planters within incorporated seating
» Permanent shade structures
» Dog waste station
Future plans will need to show
compliance with Standard
3.6.4.B.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.6.4.C Bicycle
Parking
All common open spaces shall provide
parking racks for at least four bicycles
at each pedestrian entry to the open
space.
Future plans will need to show
compliance with Standard
3.6.4.C.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.6.4.I Maximum
Landscaping Height
Internal or border landscaping of
common open spaces shall not
exceed four feet in height when fully
mature.
Future plans will need to show
compliance with Standard 3.6.4.I.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.6.5.A Pedestrian
Lighting
All areas used by pedestrians and
cyclists shall be illuminated at night.
Such areas include:
» Pedestrian pathways
» Bicycle facilities
Future plans will need to show
compliance with Standard
3.6.5.A.
C10
» Multi-modal pathways
» Open spaces
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.6.5.B Street Lighting
Street lighting shall be installed inside
the project along the network of
internal streets.
Future plans will need to show
compliance with Standard
3.6.5.B.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.6.5.C Inappropriate
lighting
No lights that blink, revolve, flash, or
change intensity shall be permitted in
residential neighborhoods.
Future plans will need to show
compliance with Standard
3.6.5.C.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.6.6.A Tree
Protection During
Construction
An ISA-Certified Arborist or
Landscape Architect shall be retained
during demolition, grading and
construction to ensure existing
protected trees are protected as
required in permit documents. Tree
protection plans shall be included in
the planning permit plan set as well as
all demolition, grading and building
permit drawings.
Future plans will need to show
compliance with Standard
3.6.6.A.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.6.6.C Invasive
Species Restriction
All plant materials shall be native
California or noninvasive, drought
tolerant species adaptable to the
Antioch climate. All species identified
in the California Invasive Plant
Council’s (Cal-IPC) Inventory of
Invasive Plants are prohibited.
Future plans will need to show
compliance with Standard
3.6.6.C.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.6.6.D Natural Turf
Restriction
Natural turf in public areas shall be
limited to play fields, dog runs and
other active recreational areas of
common open spaces.
Future plans will need to show
compliance with Standard
3.6.6.D.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.6.6.E Artificial Turf
Restriction
Artificial turf in public areas shall be
limited to playgrounds, accent areas,
and pedestrian pathways of open
common open spaces. No artificial turf
shall be installed within five feet of a
tree root crown (measured in all
directions).
Future plans will need to show
compliance with Standard
3.6.6.E.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.6.6.G Low
Maintenance Planting
Design
Plants shall be selected and
landscapes designed to ensure that
plants will grow to maturity without
regular clipping or pruning at
pathways, curbs or buildings.
Future plans will need to show
compliance with Standard
3.6.6.G.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.6.6.H Inorganic
Material Restriction
Inorganic ground cover (gravel, river
rock, etc.) is not an alternative for
plant material. It shall cover no more
Future plans will need to show
compliance with Standard
3.6.6.H.
C11
than 35 percent of the total landscape
area.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.6.6.I Design
Concepts
All landscaped areas shall include at
least two of the following planting
design concepts:
» Specimen trees (48-inch box or
more) in informal groupings or rows at
major focal points.
» Use of planting to create shadow
and patterns against walls.
» Use of planting to soften building
lines and emphasize the positive
features of the site.
» Use of flowering vines on walls,
arbors, or trellises.
» Trees to create canopy and shade,
especially in common open spaces.
The plans included in the
preliminary development plan
submittal comply with Standard
3.6.6.I.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.6.6.J Mulching
All planting areas shall be mulched to
a minimum depth
of three inches.
Future plans will need to show
compliance with Standard 3.6.6.J.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.6.6.K Interference
with Utilities
Plant materials shall be placed so they
do not restrict access to emergency
apparatus such as fire hydrants or fore
alarm boxes or disturb overhead lines
or underground utilities. Trees and
large shrubs shall be placed as
follows:
» A minimum of 6 feet between the
center of trees and the edge of a
driveway, a water meter, gas meter,
and sewer laterals.
» A minimum of 20 feet between the
center of trees and the beginning of
curb returns at intersections to keep
trees out of the line-of-sight triangle at
intersections.
» A minimum of 15 feet between the
center of trees and large shrubs to
utility poles and streetlights.
» A minimum of 8 feet between the
center of
trees or large shrubs and fire hydrants
and fire
department sprinkler and standpipe
connections.
Future plans will need to show
compliance with Standard
3.6.6.K.
C12
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.6.6.L Staking and
Root Barriers
All young trees shall be securely
staked with double staking and/or guy-
wires. Root barriers shall be required
for any tree placed within 10 feet of
pavement or other conditions where
roots could disrupt adjacent
paving/curb surfaces.
Future plans will need to show
compliance with Standard 3.6.6.L.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.6.6.M Irrigation
Enclosures
All irrigation systems shall be
designed to reduce vandalism by
placing controls in appropriate
enclosures.
Future plans will need to show
compliance with Standard
3.6.6.M.
Objective Design
Guidelines: Standard
3.6.6.N Right-of-Way
Landscaping
The landscape design requirements in
standards 3.6.6.4.1 through 3.6.6.4.4,
above, shall be applied to landscaped
areas along arterial, collector and local
streets.
Future plans will need to show
compliance with Standard
3.6.6.N.
C13
Plan Review Team
Land Management
[email protected]
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
P.O. Box 0000
City, State, Zip Code
PG&E Gas and Electric Facilities Page 1
Public
October 27, 2023
Kevin Scudero
City of Antioch
200 H Street
Antioch, CA 94509
Re: PRE2023-0003: Vineyard Crossings
Dear Kevin:
Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review the subject plans. The proposed Vineyard Crossings development is within the same vicinity of PG&E’s existing facilities that impact this property.
PG&E currently holds an easement for the operation and maintenance of an existing line of towers over the subject property. Said easement is recorded at Book 2715 and Page 339 with Contra Costa County Official Records. The Vineyard Crossings development plans propose a large bioretention and water quality basin within PG&E’s existing easement area. Said basin will take up a significant amount of space from PG&E’s easement area and will hinder PG&E’s full enjoyment of said easement and rights granted therein. Said basin will significantly reduce PG&E’s working space within its own easement, as well as limit the reconstruction or replacement of PG&E’s existing line of towers. PG&E does not approve or condone the placement of this basin within its easement area. The applicant must revise their development plans to keep PG&E’s easement area clear and accessible at all times for the continued safe operation of the tower line.
Landscaping and trees are also proposed within PG&E’s existing easement. The applicant is permitted to plant only low-growing shrubs under the wire zone and only grasses within the area directly below the tower. Along the border of the transmission line right-of-way, plant only small trees no taller than ten feet (10’). Any lounge, picnic areas, and seating within PG&E’s easement cannot be permanent in nature and must be readily removeable. No permanent structures are permitted within PG&E’s easement area.
Additionally, the applicant proposes multiple uses and improvements within PG&E’s existing property that bisects the proposed Vineyard Crossings development. Any proposed uses of roads, paths, and vineyards will require a third-party application to PG&E for said uses and improvements. The diminishment of PG&E property and rights will require necessary leases, licenses, and a California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) approval and/or 851 filing. The applicant cannot proceed with the proposed uses and improvements without the required coordination between the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) and PG&E.
Please contact the Building and Renovation Center (BRSC) for facility map requests by calling 1-877-743-7782 and PG&E’s Service Planning department at www.pge.com/cco for any modification or relocation requests, or for any additional services you may require.
ATTACHMENT D
D1
PG&E Gas and Electric Facilities Page 2
Public
As a reminder, before any digging or excavation occurs, please contact Underground Service Alert (USA) by dialing 811 a minimum of 2 working days prior to commencing any work. This free and independent service will ensure that all existing underground utilities are identified and marked on-site.
If you have any questions regarding our response, please contact me at [email protected].
Sincerely,
Justin Newell
Land Management
916-594-4068
D2
Memorandum
Date: November 3,2023
To: Kevin Scudero, Acting Director of Community Development From: Kevin Van Katwyk, Senior Engineer, Engineering
Re: List of issues for Vineyard Crossing Preliminary Development Plan, TM 9650 Submittal
Sheet C1.0 Preliminary Lotting Plan
A list of issues is the following:
• Oakley Road is a residential collector street with a proposed cross-section with a 40’ curb to curb 60 feet right of way. The cross sections along project frontage of half of the street needs to be widened to 20' wide along the project frontage (plan shows 18.5’) with a 12 ' wide travel lane and an 8' wide shoulder with new concrete curb and gutter and 6’ wide concrete sidewalk for total half of street right of way of 30’. Please revise the cross sections accordingly.
• The internal local private residential street sections are to be minimum of 38’ wide pavement (curb to curb) with 2-11’ travel lanes, 8’ parking lane, with 2- 5’ feet sidewalks on each side of the 58’ feet right of way for public street and 48 right of way for private street with 2 -10’ PUE’s. Please revise the cross sections accordingly. • We don’t agree with the 32’ wide private street pavement section of 43’ right of way shown as one of the streets. This street is too narrow and does not allow for parking on both sides of the street, nor is there enough room for emergency vehicles to get through with two lanes of traffic with parking. The private minimum street width we would allow is 36’ feet with parking on both sides for all lots to have at least one parking stall they can park on the street. Please revise the street accordingly. • With so many driveways, please provide a parking plan that shows the locations where vehicles from each unit can park on each of the streets to meet the subdivision parking requirements.
• Please provide a diagram of the traffic site visibility triangle at a typical driveway with parking. Also show line of site triangle all intersections and at 90 degree turns of the streets with project retaining walls and lot fences. As stated above please show on one plan all fencing and retaining walls with the layout of parking so we can see how the project will be in compliance with proper vehicle sight distance at the street. • Please complete the topography survey plan shown as background on many of the drawings in the submittal. Many key existing topo elevations and features are missing. • Please provide on the Oakley Road roadway, ROW dedication and landscaping improvements over the existing farm parcel and PG&E parcel that is identical with the rest of the street parkway improvements and dedications. • Provi de dimensions of the width of the driveway to lots 64-68 and add 3 parking stalls at the end of the driveway at to lots 65 and 66.
• The tw o 90 degree turns of the road curb lines in the provide 36’ wide street is unacceptable because two large vehicles with parked cars on both sides will not be able D3
to pass each other. Please provide a larger turning curve bulb for two cars to be able to pass on each of the 90-degree curves of the private street within the subdivision.
Sheet C2.0 Existing Conditions Plan
A list of issues is the following:
Please complete this topography survey drawing to a design level topography and boundary survey standards. It is missing a lot of information we normally want to see on a design level topography/ boundary survey plan. At a minimum please provide the following:
1. Show inverts of all existing wet utilities so we can review the depth and location of the existing utility system and how it works now.
2. Provide the location of existing retaining walls on Honeynut street.
3. Provide edge of pavement grades along all street frontages along the project
4. Provide sidewalk grades and grades at the top and bottom of slopes to be shown.
5. Provide the location of existing fences.
6. Provide notes on what existing improvements are going to be removed.
7. Provide the location of surveyed existing monuments found around the project to be used in the design of the project.
8. Provide recorded information of existing easements on the property.
9. Provide a recent title report of the project parcel.
10. Provide recorded information of existing road dedications of Oakley Road and Phillips Lane.
11. Please provide the location of all irrigation wells used for irrigation of the existing crops on the project. Make a note of those wells that will need to be capped and removed due to their location within the subdivision.
Sheet C3.0 Preliminary Site Plan
A list of issues is the following:
1. The subdivision does not meet the project parking requirements. Need to show all off-street parking on this sheet or another sheet showing all the driveways and house units with street dimensions.
2. Provide the geometrics of street curb radii of all curves, bends and culde sacs.
3. Provide the location and details of proposed fencing with the project.
4. Provide the location of all retaining walls on the project
5. Provide an upgraded topo survey shown as background on this plan showing existing retaining walls and other existing improvements that will remain.
6. Where will each unit garbage bins be stored next within each lot? Where will they be placed in the street on garbage pick up day with every parking space used? Please provide a separate drawing of the location of the bins drawn to scale.
8. Please provide all radii of all face of curbs within the subdivision D4
10. Provide a 12’ wide maintenance access to each bioretention basin, and a ramp to the bottom of each basin for maintenance purposes.
11. Provide a letter from PG&E right of way that they will allow the building of connecting paved street in their power line easement between the two subdivisions.
12. On the driveway to lots 65 to 68, provide a diagram of how street parking will be provided for these units.
13. Provide dimensions of this single driveway to lots 65- 68 on the site plans.
14. Provide on the sheet all street parking in each of the culd-de- sacs.
15. The 32’wide curb to curb street is too narrow and not acceptable to city standards.
16. Provide dimensions of emergency access to Honeynut Street. How will emergency vehicles deal with the large grade difference at the end of the EVAE. Provide a section of this roadway and section to Honeynut street.
17. Same comments listed on the sheet 1 also apply to his sheet.
Sheet C4.0 Preliminary Grading Plan
A list of issues is the following:
1. Please prepare a more complete preliminary grading plan showing at least the following:
a. Provide grading transitions from the lots to existing ground. b. Provide top and bottom grade transitions between lots. c. Provide top and bottom grading transitions lots to the streets. d. Provide the top of wall and bottom of wall elevations of all retaining walls for the project.
e. Provide grading transition from lots to existing ground at PG&E easements. f. Provide slope grade of all graded slopes starting from 3:1 to 2:1 max is allowed with an endorsement from soil engineer.
2. Provide grading details of typical lot grading with house and ADU.
3. Please provide a more complete grading plan to make sure to us the grading concept is well defined and works within the confines of this project.
4. Provide a soils report of the project soils.
5. Provide invert information at all storm drainage structures and ponds so we can review the adequacy of the grading design. Provide a preliminary drainage report on how the C3 flows were determined and the pond overflow devices that will handle the 10 year and 100-year flows.
6. Show the SD invert of all pipe crossings so we can see if there is enough clearance between the pipes per city specifications.
7. Provide 12’ wide ramps to all bioretention basins not to exceed 15 % grade.
8. Provide retention basins at all locations with bio-retention basins.
9. Provide for the relocation of the existing DG path north of lots 49-53.
10. Provide at least a 1-foot-wide flat area on each side of the fence line of any lot.
D5
11. Need to provide grading and storm drainage inlets, ditches, and berms for farm parcel so drainage from farm parcel does not drain into to neighboring residential lots. This is a violation of drainage law.
12. Provide maintenance access to all water quality basins within the subdivision.
13. Provide SD pipe and additional SD inlets every 400 feet of Oakley Road and Phillips Lane.
14. Per submittal requirements provide cross sections through the project.
Sheet C5.0 Preliminary Utility Plan
A list of issues is the following:
1. Provide a complete concept design of sewer system by showing inverts of sewer structures.
2. Provide a complete concept design of SD system by showing inverts of pipes or reference the complete storm drain design shown on the grading plan.
3. Provide pipe clearances where SD and SS cross each other demonstrating that the system works as proposed.
4. Provide a typical detail of the location of all utilities to each unit within a typical lot.
5. Provide the location of joint trench in the subdivision. Provide location for the various large power and cable boxes will be located within the subdivision.
6. Provide the approximate location of transformers and other underground electrical equipment in the subdivision.
7. Provide maintenance access to all bioretention basins within the project.
8. Provide the size of the existing water line in Phillips Lane.
9. Provide sewer study report of the peak sewer flows from this new subdivision
10. Provide a Water study report on the peak water demands from this subdivision.
11. Provide the location of streetlights and mailboxes within the subdivision.
Sheet C6.0 Preliminary Stormwater Control Plan
D6
D7
D8
D9
D10
D11
D12
D13
CITY OF ANTIOCH
PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
Regular Meeting December 6, 2023 6:30 p.m. City Council Chambers
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chairperson Gutilla called the meeting to order at 6:30 P.M. on Wednesday, December 6, 2023,
in Council Chambers.
Acting Planning Manager Merideth introduced newly appointed Commissioner Cortney Jones.
2. ROLL CALL
Present: Commissioners Jones, Lutz, Martin, Vice Chairperson Riley and Chairperson Gutilla
Absent: Commissioner Hills (arrived at 6:32
P.M.)
Staff: Outside Legal Counsel, Michael Conneran
Acting Director of Community Development, Kevin Scudero Acting Planning Manager, Zoe Merideth
Minutes Clerk, Kitty Eiden
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Chairperson Gutilla led the Pledge of Allegiance.
4. EX-PARTE COMMUNICATIONS - None
5. PUBLIC COMMENT – None
Commissioner Hills arrived at 6:32
P.M.
6. CONSENT CALENDAR
6-1.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes October 18, 2023
6-2. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes November 1, 2023
On motion by Commissioner Martin, seconded by Commissioner Hills the Planning Commission unanimously approved Consent Calendar Items 6- 1 and 6 -2. The motion carried the following vote:
AYES: Jones, Hills, Lutz, Martin, Riley, Gutilla
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
ATTACHMENT E
E1
Planning Commission
Regular Meeting
December 6, 2023 Page 2 of 6
Acting Director of Community Development Scudero requested the Planning Commission take a five-minute recess to allow the City’s consultant additional time to arrive.
C
hairperson Gutilla declared a recess at 6:36 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 6:39 P.M. with all Commissioners present.
7. P
UBLIC HEARING
7 -1. PRE2023-0003 | Vineyard Crossing | APN 051- 191-028-4 and 051-191-034-2:
- The applicant, BrightSky Residential LLC, is requesting a Preliminary Development Plan (PDP) Review for the Vineyard Crossing Project consisting of 71 single-family units and 70 accessory dwelling units (ADUs) on 71 residential lots. The 14.6-acre proposed project would also include amenities for the residents consisting of a recreation center, pool, and spa for the community, as well as pedestrian paths throughout the proposed open space areas.
C
ontract Planner Valente presented the staff report dated December 6, 2023, recommending the Planning Commission: 1) Provide feedback to the applicant and City staff regarding the proposal and provide direction to the applicant for the Final Development Plan submittal.
Charles McKeag thanked the Planning Commission for allowing them to present the project and staff for bringing it forward. He stated they looked forward to receiving input from the Planning Commission this evening. He announced their development team was present to answer any questions. He clarified that this was a single-family rental community, and they were looking at density and zoning. He reported lot size was consistent with the adjacent project. He stated the unique aspect of the project was the accessory dwelling units to provide a product for those not in the market to purchase a home. He noted they were excited to bring a different type of product to Antioch.
C
hairperson Gutilla opened the public comment period.
A
lexander Broom expressed concern that the project did not align with the principals highlighted in Senate Bill 9 safeguarding communities from large scale corporate ownership of housing units. He noted the proposed density would be a large alteration to that portion of Antioch. He expressed concern that the project lacked low -income units and he urged the Planning Commission to carefully consider this proposal. He stated he believed this project would increase rents throughout the City.
Laur
a Kindsvater , Antioch resident, reviewed written comment she submitted outlining her concerns with the landscaping plan for the proposed project and requesting the developers and City consider incorporating native and locally native keystone species.
A
ndrew Becker spoke in opposition to the project noting it was not needed and it would only provide a benefit to the investors.
C
hairperson Gutilla closed the public comment period.
E2
Planning Commission
Regular Meeting
December 6, 2023 Page 3 of 6
Commissioner Martin commented that there were too many units on the property and ADUs were on many lots that were too small. He questioned why the City was not requiring the inclusion of low and middle income rental rates. He suggested lot sizes be a minimum of 6000 square feet, rear yard setbacks a minimum of 10- feet and side yard setbacks be a minimum of 5-feet. He suggested relocating the community facility to a central location. He agreed with staff on requiring a parking analysis and Homeowners Association as well as a minimum street width of 38 feet. He noted if it was determined that on- street parking was not feasible, guest parking needed to be provided. He spoke in support of enhancing community amenities to include items such as a play area and barbeques. He requested a VMT study be conducted and include the effects this project would have on the Phillips Lane and E 18 th Street intersection. He expressed
concern for the removal of the vineyards to accommodate development.
In response to Commissioner Jones , Acting Director of Community Development Scudero explained the applicant was proposing establishing PD standards which provided for flexibility.
He commented that they were asking the Planning Commission to take that into consideration and provide feedback.
In response to Commissioner Jones, Mr. McKeag commented that their company was about producing a unique rental product attainable by more people. He provided context for the preliminary development phase and explained that their development team would be working with outside agencies to address their concerns. He clarified that they were looking for feedback from the Commission on the proposal before them this evening.
In response to Commissioner Jones, Contract Planner Valente explained that the plants proposed were locally acclimated for the climate and low water usage; however, they were not necessarily native to the area.
Commissioner Hills thanked staff for the presentation and commented that this project was unique. She stated that she agreed with Commissioner Martin that the project was very dense, and the parking situation was a concern. She also agreed with requiring a parking analysis.
She suggested consideration of a scooter program like this applicant’s other project and providing access to the BART station. She supported requiring keystone native plants in the landscape plan.
In response to Commissioner Hills, Acting Director of Community Development Scudero explained if the project submitted an entitlement application it would go through a thorough environmental review and must comply with any environmental mitigation identified.
Contract Planner Valente added that some protected species had been in the area in the past so part of the f uture environmental review would be to survey the area prior to construction to determine if they were onsite and what type of measures would be needed if they were found.
In response to Commissioner Hills, Mr. McKeag explained that each unit would be rented separately and have their own private yard space. He added their parking calculations w ere based on detailed plans.
E3
Planning Commission
Regular Meeting
December 6, 2023 Page 4 of 6
In response to Commissioner Lutz, Mr. McKeag stated this project would be professionally managed and maintained with onsite staff. He noted they had accepted a condition of approval that in the event they sold any lots, a Homeowners Association would replace their management team. He explained their landscape designer had followed the City’s approved plant list.
Acting Director of Community Development Scudero added the City had adopted landscape design guidelines; however, the Planning Commission had discretion to provide guidance as to what they wanted for this site.
Mr. McKeag stated that he appreciated the comments regarding native keystone species and that the issue could be studied.
Commissioner Lutz encouraged the applicant to consider native keystone species in their landscape plan. He expressed concern regarding the density of the project and the lack of affordable housing units. He stated he was aware of the trend in development, and he understood the need for housing. He noted his concern was for those who struggled to purchase a home and noted if the project moved forward, he wanted to make sure all the feedback provided this evening was incorporated into the final development plan.
Commissioner Riley questioned why the applicant brought forward a deconstructed apartment design instead of a townhome style product. He noted having an ADU on every lot defeated the intent of accessory dwelling units that typically were added on post purchase. He added that this project increased density, wasted space and would become another car centric community.
Acting Director of Community Development Scudero clarified ADUs did not count toward density per state law, so this was a way for the developer to add extra units and remain within General Plan densities. He added that the General Plan did not allow multifamily at this location.
Commissioner Riley questioned if there was a possibility of changing zoning to allow multifamily development since he felt this design in a secluded area would have a negative impact on the future of Antioch.
Acting Director of Community Development Scudero responded that the Hillcrest Station Area Specific Plan needed to be updated. He noted the vision was when the area was built out there would be connectivity from this area to the BART station. He further noted it was not feasible for this developer to provide that connectivity since it was outside the bounds of their development footprint.
Acting Director of Community Development Scudero stated he would send a link to the Commission for the Hillcrest Station Area Specific Plan.
Chairperson Gutilla questioned if having a major transit stop would open by right development for low-income housing should connectivity be established to the BART station.
Acting Director of Community Development Scudero responded that it would depend on the funding source for affordable housing.
E4
Planning Commission
Regular Meeting
December 6, 2023 Page 5 of 6
Commissioner Riley reiterated that he would prefer the land to be converted into lower density single family or higher density multifamily housing . He noted that the proposed project was incompatible with current development.
Commissioner Hills reported that Gray Star had an essential housing program with rent based on area medium income, and she suggested the City consider looking into that program to help satisfy the communities concern for affordable housing.
In response to Commissioner Jones, Acting Director of Community Development Scudero explained that Antioch did not have an i nclusionary housing ordinance; however, one of their goals was to bring an ordinance forward for consideration. He commented that they would have to look at the logistics for the H omeowners Association and put in the necessary protections to make sure maintenance responsibilities were accounted for should the property sell. He clarified that currently the main structure and ADU would be sold as one.
Acting Planning Manager Merideth added that in January state law would allow a city to opt into the option of selling each unit separately; however, Antioch had not opted into that program so selling the ADU separately would not be allowed under the current ordinance.
In response to Commissioner Jones, Mr. McKeag reported the smallest ADU would rent comparable to a one- bedroom apartment at approximately $2000.00 - $2200.00 and follow upwards depending on bedroom count and square footage.
Commissioner Martin spoke in support of the floor plans and architectural designs. He requested the ADUs match the architectural style of the main unit . He agreed with the request for native plant species in the landscaping plans.
Chairperson Gutilla thanked the Commission for the robust discussion and agreed with previous comments. She expressed concern regarding the density of the project and insufficient setbacks. She supported moving the recreation center to be more centrally located and suggested additional recreational amenities for children and enhanced features along the trails.
She requested wider streets with sidewalks on both sides. She stated she also agreed with the staff’s comments and recommendations.
In response to Chairperson Gutilla, Mr. Mckeag reported the vineyard was PG&E property and they had no contractual control over the maintenance of the area. He reviewed the property boundaries and noted there was a trail that connected this property to an existing public park.
Chairperson Gutilla stated it was a tough balance between giving people the opportunity to rent a space to save up for homeownership and trapping people in a space where they could not afford it. She stated the comments provided this evening gave reasonable suggestions to move forward in another direction.
Chairperson Gutilla c losed the comment period and thanked the applicant for bringing their project forward.
E5
Planning Commission
Regular Meeting
December 6, 2023 Page 6 of 6
8. ORAL/WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
Acting Planning Manager Merideth presented a slide that showed of the Planning Commission’s year in review and thanked them for their participation.
Acting Director of Community Development Scudero added that a lot had been accomplished and he thanked the Planning Commission for their commitment to the community. He wished everyone a happy holiday.
10. COMMITTEE REPORTS
Acting Director of Community Development Scudero stated that he would look into filling the Planning Commission vacancy on the TRANSPLAN Committee.
11. NEXT MEETING: January 17, 2024: December 20, 2023 and January 3, 2024 meetings are canceled.
Chairperson Gutilla announced that the December 20, 2023, and January 3, 2024, Planning Commission meetings were canceled, and the next meeting was scheduled to take place on January 17, 2024. She stated she would not be in attendance for the January 17, 2024, meeting.
12. ADJOURNMENT
On motion by Commissioner Riley , seconded by Commissioner Hills, the Planning Commission unanimously adjourned the meeting at 8:19
P.M. The motion carried the
following vote:
AYES: Martin, Hills, Jones, Lutz, Riley, Gutilla
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
Kitty Eiden
KITTY EIDEN, Minutes Clerk
E6
Vineyard Crossing
Preliminary Development Plan
Review
City Council
January 23, 2024
Project Location
• Located north of Oakley
Road and West of Phillips
lane. In the vicinity to
Highway 160.
• An existing PG&E utility
easement divides the
project site.
• The City of Antioch General
Plan designates the western
parcel of the project site as
Medium Low Density
Residential (MLDR) and the
Eastern parcel as Medium
Density Residential (MDR).
Project Site
Undeveloped Land
Agricultural
Single Family Residences
Multi
Family
Residences
Single Family
Residences
Single
Family
Residences
Single
Family
Residences
The City of Antioch received a request for a preliminary development plan (PDP) review by BrightSky Residential LLC, (applicant) for the following:
• 71 single family residences (SFRs);
• 70 accessory dwelling units (ADUs);
• A recreation center with pool and spa; and
• Pedestrian paths throughout the proposed open space areas.
Proposed Project
Site Plan
Landscape Plan
Preliminary Development Plan
• The proposed PDP review is a non entitlement action and does not require environmental review or other entitlements.
• The purpose of a PDP review is to gather feedback in order for the applicant to become aware of concerns and/or issues to be addressed. • Staff reviewed the application for consistency with the General Plan Land Use Designations, zoning standards, and consistency with the City’s Objective Design Standards.
• Staff also routed the project application to other City Departments and applicable agencies for comment.
Proposed Residential Density
• The maximum allowable density in MLDR land use designation is six dwelling units per gross developable acre (du/ac) and the maximum allowable density in the MDR land use designation is ten du/ac.
• The calculated gross density for just the western parcel is 4.71 du/ac, which has the MLDR designation and allows for a maximum of six du/ac per gross developable acre. • The calculated gross density for just the eastern parcel 4.90 du/ac, which has the MDR designation and allows for a maximum of ten du/ac per gross developable acre. • The applicant will need to provide the gross developable density for each property to ensure General Plan compliance during the entitlement phase. • Typical development in the MLDR and MDR designation would include attached and/or cluster-type, ownership, oriented units including some with private yards and common recreation areas.
Zoning Standards
• The site is currently zoned PD, which is intended to allow some flexibility from zoning standards to better integrate a project into its setting while maintaining consistency with the General Plan.
• As a result, the project would include a PD rezone, which would be required to establish these specific development standards, including lot size, yard setbacks, and building height requirements.
• Staff reviewed the current development standards in the R-6 Single-Family Residential District and the R-10 Medium Density Residential District as a comparison for consistency with the development intended for the MLDR and MDR land use designations.
Zoning Standards – Single Family Residences
• The proposed residential building heights and front yard setbacks for the single-family residences are consistent with the R-6 and R-10 district regulations.
• However, the proposed project includes varying interior side and rear yard setbacks that are not consistent with the minimum five-foot interior side yard setback and 10-foot rear yard setbacks of the R-6 and R-10 districts respectively.
• The proposed project currently includes some four-foot interior side yard setbacks and some rear yard setbacks as small as six feet.
Zoning Standards – Single Family Residences
• Out of the proposed 71 lots, seven currently meet the minimum 6,000- square-foot lot size requirement for the R-6 and R-10 zoning districts and a majority of the proposed lots do not meet the minimum lot width, which would be 65-feet for a corner lot and 60-feet for an interior lot. • Maximum lot coverage for the R-6 and R-10 zoning district is 40 percent and if the largest floor plan is built on the smallest lot, it would result in a 53 percent lot coverage. If the largest floor plan was built on the largest lot, it would result in a 30 percent lot coverage. • Staff recommends the City Council consider the proposed lot sizes and setbacks and provide feedback to establish the final development plan and standards the proposed PD standards.
Zoning Standards – Accessory Dwelling Units
• The Antioch Municipal Code also provides development standards for detached ADUs that are smaller than 800 square feet related to building height and rear and side yard setbacks.
• The proposed project’s ADUs are consistent with the citywide ADU development standards for maximum height of 16-feet and four-foot side and rear yard setbacks, as well as the standards for ADUs provided by the State of California.
Objective Design Standards
• In August 2023, the City of Antioch adopted citywide Single-Family and Missing Middle Residential Objective Design Standards.
• These Objective Standards apply to all aspects of residential projects including building siting, architectural style, parking, and landscaping. • Consistent with the Objective Standards, the proposed residences are oriented toward the adjacent street with varying front yard setbacks.
Objective Design Standards
• The proposed project also includes three different floor plans ranging in size from 1,492 sf to 1,697 sf, with three complimentary elevations each – farmhouse, transitional, and craftsman.
• In addition, the proposed project include two different ADU options ranging in size from 603 sf or 750 sf.
Objective Design Standards
• The Craftsman Style , featuring a stucco and lap siding exterior with board and batten and decorative wood corbels at the upper gables, with a decorative stone veneer.
• The Farmhouse Style features a stucco
and board and batten exterior with
decorative wood corbels.
• The Transitional Style
features a stucco
exterior with a
decorative brick veneer,
and decorative window
shutters.
Objective Design Standards
• A proposed recreation center with outdoor pool and spa would be located near the center of the west parcel.
• Additional active open space areas and increased pedestrian connectivity would comply with the City’s Objective Design Standards.
Objective Design Standards
• Two decomposed granite trails would
provide connection between the two
parcels through the PG&E easement,
with picnic areas fencing and low stone
walls along the path.
• Total landscaped areas would consist of
approximately 1.04 acres of shrubs, turf,
and trees.
• Plant material for this project would be
locally acclimated, drought tolerant, and
moderate or low water use.
Traffic Circulation
• The proposed project includes primary site access through Oakley Road and Phillips Lane into a new internal roadway network, which includes 36-foot- wide and 32-foot-wide roads.
• During the project review process, City Engineering and the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District (CCCFPD) provided comments letters identifying concerns regarding the currently proposed street widths. • Staff would need the internal roadways to be a minimum of 38-feet-wide from curb to curb to accommodate two 11-foot travel lanes, eight-foot parking lanes, and two five-foot sidewalks on each side.
Parking
• Each proposed single-family residence would have a two-car garage with driveway and each ADU would include a parking pad with driveway. • Therefore, each proposed lot would include two driveways, which would severely limit street parking options for residents and guests. • As a result, City Engineering requests a parking plan to show how many vehicles would be able to use street parking.
• Pursuant to the CCCFPD, the proposed driveways for lots 43 and 46 also do not currently meet access requirements for fire apparatus.
Other Issues
• The proposed project is proposed to be renter occupied. However, nothing precludes applicant from selling lots individually in the future. • Staff would require the formation of a homeowner’s association (HOA) to ensure maintenance of all common areas would be covered should the lots be sold in the future.
Other Issues
• Pursuant the Antioch Municipal Code:
o An ADU must not be sold separately from the primary dwelling; and o The ADU is restricted to the approved size and to other attributes allowed by the code.
• In addition, the proposed roadway and pedestrian pathways through the PG&E easement would require a third-party approval by PG&E, and the project applicant would need to secure the necessary leases, licenses, and a California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) approval and/or 851 filing.
Planning Commission Feedback
• On December 6th, 2023 the Antioch Planning Commission held a public hearing regarding the proposed project.
• The Planning Commission was in support of the project’s architectural designs but did not support the currently proposed small lots and setbacks, narrow roads, and trails that do not seem to offer much benefit to the residents.
• The Commissioners requested additional active open spaces, native landscaping, and parking.
• The Planning Commission also provided concerns regarding the development being renter occupied.
Public Comment
• During the December 6th Planning Commission meeting, several members from the public also spoke and provided comment.
• Members of the public also expressed concerns for the proposed small lots, lack of parking, a corporate owned subdivision, and the need to integrate local and native plant species into the development.
Staff Conclusion
Staff is supportive of the architectural styles and proposed design of the residences; however, staff has a number of concerns with the proposed project’s street design and access, pedestrian connectivity, lack of active recreation amenities.
Staff Recommendations:
1. Provide Active recreational areas
2. Provide increased pedestrian connectivity to the proposed recreation center/pool.
3. Provide internal local private residential street sections that are consistent with minimum Engineering standards, including travel lanes, street parking, and sidewalk widths.
4. Provide concept designs of the proposed sewer system and a more complete preliminary grading plan.
5. Coordinate with the CCCFPD to ensure compliance with the 2022 California Fire Code (CFC), the 2022 California Building Code (CBC), the 2022 California Residential Code (CRC), and all Local and County Ordinances and adopted standards.
6. Coordinate with PG&E to ensure the existing easement is not impacted due to this proposed development.
Discussion and Feedback
VINEYARD CROSSING
PRELIMINARY
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
AERIAL VIEW
•
•
•
GENERAL PLAN DENSITY AND ZONING
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
SITE PLAN WITH 6000 SF LOTS
COMPARISON OF DENSITY
Western Parcel Eastern Parcel Overall
Acreage 10.29 ac 4.35 ac 14.64 ac
GP Max Density1;
Units
6 du/ac;
62 units
10 du/ac;
43 units
7.2 du/ac;
105 units
Proposed Density
/ Units
4.7 du/ac;
48 units
(+48 ADUs)
5.3 du/ac;
23 units
(+22 ADUs)
4.8 du/ac;
71 units
(+70 ADUs)
6000 SF Lots
Density / Units
3.6 du/ac;
37 units
3.7 du/ac;
16 units
3.6 du/ac;
53 units
1 From General Plan Land Use Element p 4-19
CITY-STANDARD STREETS & ON-STREET PARKING
LOT PARKING AND ON-STREET PARKING
LANDSCAPE PLAN
SAMPLE STREETSCAPE
Thank you.
ANTIOCH POLICE
DEPARTMENT
Community Services Officer Presentation
1/23/24
#4.02
What is a Community Services Officer (CSO)?
- Civilian employee (non-sworn and do not have a peace officer status). - Perform a wide variety of specialized and technical non-sworn law enforcement duties in support of Police Department operations.
- Do not respond to emergency calls for service.
- Do not respond to or handle in-progress crimes.
- Do not respond to or handle violent crimes.
Duties
- Respond to non-emergency and/or cold calls for service in-lieu of a Police Officer. - Operate the City’s temporary holding facility.
- Provide information and assistance to the general public at the front counter in the PD. - Maintain the storage, maintenance, tracking, and control of police property and evidence. - Serve as a Crime Scene Investigator.
- Perform a variety of duties to enforce the vehicle code regarding abandoned and stored vehicles. - Provide traffic control.
- Assist the Investigations Bureau on various cases.
- Perform a variety of clerical and administrative functions related to training and recruiting. - Perform related duties as required.
Current CSO Staffing
11 authorized CSO positions
1 vacancy
Current Assignments
1 – Front Counter
1 – Administration (training/recruiting)
2 – Property Evidence
6 – Field Services