ANNOTATED AGENDA
Antioch City Council
REGULAR MEETING
Date: Tuesday, April 9, 2024
Time: 5:15 P.M. Closed Session
7:00 P.M. Regular Meeting
Place: Council Chambers
Antioch, CA 94509
City Council meetings are televised live on Comcast channel 24, AT&T U-verse channel 99, or live stream (at www.antiochca.gov). Please see the inside cover for detailed Speaker Rules.
PLEASE TURN OFF CELL PHONES BEFORE ENTERING COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
Lamar A. Hernandez-Thorpe, Mayor Ellie Householder, City Clerk Monica E. Wilson, Mayor Pro Tem (District 4) Lauren Posada, City Treasurer Tamisha Torres-Walker, Council Member District 1
Michael Barbanica, Council Member District 2 Kwame P. Reed, Acting City Manager Lori Ogorchock, Council Member District 3 Thomas Lloyd Smith, City Attorney
ACCESSIBILITY: In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and California law, it is the policy of the City of Antioch to offer its public programs, services and meetings in a manner that is readily accessible to everyone, including individuals with disabilities. If you are a person with a disability and require information or materials in an appropriate alternative format; or if you require any other accommodation, please contact the ADA Coordinator at the number or address below at least 72 hours prior to the meeting or when you desire to receive services. Advance notification within this guideline will can be reached @ Phone: (925) 779-6950, and e-mail: [email protected].
ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL -1- APRIL 9, 2024
Notice of Availability of Reports
This agenda is a summary of the actions proposed to be taken by the City Council. For almost every agenda item, materials have been prepared by the City staff for the Council's consideration. These materials include staff reports which explain in detail the item before the Council and the reason for the recommendation. The materials may also include resolutions or ordinances which are proposed to be adopted. Unless otherwise noted, City Council actions include a determination that the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply. The Council meets regularly on the second and fourth Tuesdays of the month at 7:00 p.m., with Closed Sessions often occurring before or after the regular before each Council Meeting. To be notified when the agenda packets are simply click on this link: Notifications City of Antioch, California (antiochca.gov) and enter your e-mail address to subscribe. To view the agenda information, click on the following link: City Council City of Antioch, California (antiochca.gov) . Questions may be directed to the staff member who prepared the staff report, or to the City Clerk's Office, who will refer you to the appropriate person.
Notice of Opportunity to Address Council
The public has the opportunity to address the City Council on each agenda item. To address the Council, fill out a Speaker Request form and place in the Speaker Card Tray near the City Clerk before the meeting begins. This will enable us to call upon you to speak. Comments regarding matters not on this Agenda may be addressed during the "Public Comments" section. No one may speak more than once on an the Council Chambers. Please see the Speaker Rules on the inside cover of this Agenda.
5:16 P.M. ROLL CALL CLOSED SESSION for Council Members Council Members District 1 Torres-Walker, District 2 Barbanica, District 3
Ogorchock, and Mayor Pro Tem (District 4) Wilson
[Mayor Hernandez-Thorpe Absent]
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
PUBLIC COMMENTS for Closed Session None
CLOSED SESSION:
1) PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RECRUITMENT OF CITY MANAGER. This closed session is authorized pursuant to Government Code Section 54957(b)(1).
Direction provided to Human Resources Director and City Attorney
5:18 P.M. MOTIONED TO ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION
7:01 P.M. ROLL CALL REGULAR MEETING for Council Members Council Members District 1 Torres-Walker, District 2 Barbanica, District 3
Ogorchock, and Mayor Pro Tem (District 4) Wilson
[Mayor Hernandez-Thorpe Absent]
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL -2- APRIL 9, 2024
CITY ATTORNEY TO REPORT OUT ON CLOSED SESSION
MOMENT OF SILENCE IN MEMORY OF FRED HOSKINS
COUNCIL MEMBER BARBANICA REQUESTED A MOTION TO SUSPEND THE RULES TO MOVE COUNCIL REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS #8 AND #9 TO BE HEARD AFTER AGENDA ITEM #4 - PRESENTATION; APPROVED, 4/0
1. PROCLAMATION
Arbor Day, April 26, 2024
Approved, 4/0
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council approve the proclamation.
2. ANNOUNCEMENTS OF CIVIC AND COMMUNITY EVENTS
KEEP ANTIOCH BEAUTIFUL April 20, 2024
3. ANNOUNCEMENTS OF BOARD AND COMMISSION OPENINGS
CONTRA COSTA MOSQUITO & VECTOR CONTROL BOARD
PUBLIC COMMENTS Members of the public may comment only on unagendized items.
The public may comment on agendized items when they come up on this Agenda.
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS/COMMUNICATIONS
4. PRESENTATION Antioch First 5 Presentation
Presented by Family and Community Liaison, Monique S. Angara
ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL -3- APRIL 9, 2024
COUNCIL REGULAR AGENDA
8. SALES TAX CITIZENS' OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT FOR ONE PARTIAL- TERM VACANCY, EXPIRING MARCH 2026
Recommended Action:
1) It is recommended that the Mayor nominate the candidate for appointment.
Reso No. 2024/47
Oversight Committee for the partial-term vacancy expiring March 2026, 4/0
2)
partial-term vacancy expiring March 2026.
9. PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS FOR THREE (3) VACANCIES EXPIRING MARCH 2028
Recommended Action:
1) It is recommended that the Mayor nominate the candidate for appointment.
Reso No. 2024/48 adopted appointing Dominique King to the Parks and Recreation Commission for a full-term vacancy, expiring March 2028, 4/0
2)
appointment of Dominique King to the Parks and Recreation Commission for a full- term, expiring March 2028.
Reso No. 2024/49 adopted appointing Daynon Matthews to the Parks and Recreation Commission for a full-term vacancy, expiring March 2028, 4/0
3)
appointment of Daynon Matthews to the Parks and Recreation Commission for a full- term, expiring March 2028.
Reso No. 2024/50 adopted appointing La Shan Hunt to the Parks and Recreation Commission for a full-term vacancy, expiring March 2028, 4/0
4)
appointment of La Shan Hunt to the Parks and Recreation Commission for a full-term, expiring March 2028.
ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL -4- APRIL 9, 2024
5. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MARCH 12, 2024 Continued, 4/0
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council continue the Meeting Minutes.
B. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR MARCH 26, 2024 Continued, 4/0
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council continue the Meeting Minutes.
C. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL WARRANTS
Approved, 4/0
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council approve the warrants.
D. INCREASE OF PURCHASE ORDER WITH TYLER TECHNOLOGIES FOR UTILITY
BILLING
Reso No. 2024/51 adopted, 4/0
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution approving an increase to the purchase order with Tyler
Technologies for $150,000 in fiscal year 2024 and $150,000 in fiscal year 2025 for utility billing services.
E. FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE CONSUTRUCTION AGREEMENT WITH AMERICAN PAVEMENT SYSTEMS, INC. FOR THE ANTIOCH CAPE SEAL PROJECT 2023; P.W. 328- 13 Reso No. 2024/52 adopted, 4/0
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution:
1) Approving the first amendment to increase the construction agreement with American Pavement Systems, Inc. for the
Antioch Cape Seal Project 2023 in the Amount of $47,810.10 for a total contract of $2,209,566.17; and
2) Authorizing the Acting City Manager to execute the
amendment in a form approved by the City Attorney.
ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL -5- APRIL 9, 2024
CONSENT CALENDAR Continued
F. RESOLUTION TO APPROVE AN INCREASE TO THE PURCHASE ORDER FOR
GRAINGER AND INCREASE THE AMOUNT ON THE RECURRING PURCHASE ORDER LIST
Reso No. 2024/53 adopted, 4/0
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution:
1) Approving an increase to the Fiscal Year 2023/24 purchase order with Grainger Inc. in the amount of $50,000 for a total amount not to exceed $150,000;
2) Approving an increase to the annual recurring purchase order in the amount of $50,000 not to exceed $150,000; and
3) Authorizing the Acting City Manager to execute the increase to the purchase order.
G. SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE MAINTENANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH LEE'S
BUILDING MAINTENANCE COMPANY FOR CITYWIDE JANITORIAL SERVICES Reso No. 2024/54 adopted, 4/0
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution:
1) Approving a second amendment to the maintenance services citywide janitorial services in the amount of $50,000 for a total contract amount of $708,180; and
2) Authorizing the Acting City Manager to execute the second Company in a form approved by the City Attorney.
PUBLIC HEARING
6. LEUNG PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Feedback provided to applicant and staff
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council provide feedback to the applicant and staff regarding the proposal and provide direction to the applicant for the Final Development Plan submittal.
ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL -6- APRIL 9, 2024
PUBLIC HEARING Continued
7. RANCHO MEADOWS PROJECT PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Feedback provided to applicant and staff
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council provide feedback to the applicant and staff regarding the proposal and provide direction to the applicant for the Final Development Plan submittal.
COUNCIL REGULAR AGENDA Continued
[ITEMS #8 AND #9 MOVED UP]
10. RESTRUCTURING OF THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION AD HOC
COMMITTEE DISSOLUTION OR EXTENSION UNTIL A SPECIFIC DATE Council motioned to dissolve ad hoc committee, 4/0
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council dissolve the Restructuring of the Economic Development Commission Ad Hoc Committee.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Council Members report out
various activities and any Council Member may place an item for discussion and direction on a future agenda. Timing determined by Mayor and Acting City Manager
no longer than 90 days.
MOTION TO ADJOURN After Council Communications and Future Agenda Items, the Mayor will make a motion to adjourn the meeting. A second motion is required, and then a majority vote is required to adjourn the meeting.
Motioned to adjourn meeting at 10:31 p.m., 4/0
ARBOR DAY
APRIL 26, 2024
WHEREAS, in 1872, J. Sterling Morton proposed to the Nebraska Board of Agriculture that a special day be set aside for the planting of trees;
WHEREAS, this holiday, called Arbor Day, was first observed with the planting of more than a million trees in Nebraska;
WHEREAS, trees can reduce the erosion of our precious topsoil by wind and water, cut heating and cooling costs, moderate the temperature, clean the air, produce life-giving oxygen, and
provide habitat for wildlife;
WHEREAS, trees beautify our community and are a renewable resource giving us paper, wood for our homes, and fuel for our fires;
WHEREAS, the City of Antioch has been named Tree City USA for the nineteenth consecutive year; and
WHEREAS, the City of Antioch will be celebrating Arbor Day with a tree planting at Hansen Park on April 26, 2024, at 10:00 a.m. with City Staff, and all members of the community are welcome.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, LAMAR A. HERNANDEZ-THORPE, Mayor of the City of Antioch, hereby proclaim April 26, 2024 as ARBOR DAY in the City of Antioch and urge all citizens to celebrate Arbor Day and to support efforts to protect our trees and woodlands.
APRIL 9, 2024
LAMAR A. HERNANDEZ-THORPE,
Mayor
1 04-09-24
#2
BOARD / COMMISSION / COMMITTEE
VACANCY ANNOUNCEMENTS
Phone: (925) 779-7009 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 200 H Street/P.O. Box 5007 [email protected] Antioch, CA. 94531-5007
https://bit.ly/COA-BC23 AntiochIsOpportunity.com
The City of Antioch encourages residents to become involved in their local community. One way to do so is to serve on one of the various Boards, Commissions, and Committees. Any interested resident is invited to apply for the following vacancies by the Deadline Date on Friday, April 26, 2024:
CCC MO
SQUITO & VECTOR CONTROL BOARD
One (1) Vacancy, expiring April 2026
To be considered for the vacancy position(s) listed
above, please fill out and sign the “Community
Service Application” form available online on the
City’s website at: https://bit.ly/COA-BC23. Printed
applications are also available at Antioch City Hall,
200 H Street, Antioch, CA.
Please return the completed application by the
deadline date listed above, by email to:
[email protected]. You can also drop off the
application (Attn: City Clerk), in the water billing
drop-off box outside Antioch City Hall.
Yo
ur interest and desire to serve our community
can make a difference.
#3
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY MOSQUITO &
VECTOR CONTROL BOARD OF TRUSTEES
One (1) Vacancy, expiring April 2026
Deadline Date: By 5:00 p.m., April 26, 2024
The City of Antioch encourages residents to become involved in their local community .
One way to do so is to serve on various commissions, boards, and committees. Any interested resident is encouraged to apply.
Purpose:
The Board of Trustees are officials appointed by their respective city councils to govern the Mosquito and Vector Control District knowledgeably and effectively . They serve without compensation for a term of two to four years and are highly dedicated to this community service.
Additional information regarding the responsibilities and duties are available online at www.contracostamosquito.com.
Qualifications:
To be eligible, you must be a Contra Costa County taxpayer who is at least 18 years old and interested in any of the following areas: public health, public policy, wetlands, farming, community education, finance, personnel, or land development.
Meetings:
The Board meets on the second Monday of every other the month starting January, at 7:00 p.m., and occasionally, it may be necessary to hold a special Board meeting.
Location:
Meetings are to be held at the District Office address, located at 155 Mason Circle, Concord.
Applying:
If you are interested in pursuing volunteer positions with the City of Antioch, please complete an application and submit it via email to [email protected], or mail/deliver it to the Office of the City Clerk, by the deadline date mentioned above. Applications must include your responses to the Questionnaire to be considered.
Applications are available on the City’s website at: https://bit.ly/COA- BC23, and at the City Clerk’s Office.
Community Service Application for:
CCC MOSQUITO & VECTOR CONTROL BOARD
One (1) Vacancy, expiring April 2026
*Required field Deadline Date: By 5:00 p.m., April 26, 2024 APPLICANT INFORMATION Youth 14-17
*Full Name: Main Phone:
( )
Alternate Phone:
( )
*Residence Address:
Antioch, CA
E-mail Address:
Employer/School: Occupation: Resident since:
*PARENT/GUARDIAN INFORMATION (If applicant is age 14-17 years) *Full Name: Main Phone:
( )
Alternate Phone:
( )
*Residence Address:
Antioch, CA
E-mail Address:
*QUESTIONNAIRE
Please answer the questions below on a separate sheet(s) and attach. Applications without these questions answered will not be considered. Please attach your resume (recommended to enhance your application).
1. List (3) main reasons for your interest in Contra Costa County Mosquito & Vector Control Board.
2. What skills/knowledge do you have that would be helpful in serving on this Board?
3. Do you have any previous city community service on this Board? (If yes, pleas explain)
4. Please add any other information/comments that would be helpful in reviewing your application. *ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
My signature below indicates my understanding and acknowledgement that:
*This completed application is available for public review (youth applications are exempt). *I have read and agree to the requirements listed on the Vacancy Announcement. *To the best of my ability, I will attend the Board regular meetings: bi-monthly on the second Monday of the month.
Please return completed application:
• Mail to: Office of the City Clerk
P.O. Box 5007, Antioch CA 94531
• In Person: Antioch City Hall-Clerk’s Office
200 H Street, 3rd Floor
• Email to: [email protected]
___________________________ _________
*Applicant Signature *Date
_________
__________________ _________
*Parent/Guardian Signature *Date
(An original, signed application with parent/
guardian signature is required, if a minor)
Welcome!
¡Bienviendo!
ANTIOCH FIRST 5 CENTER
Los Primeros 5 de Antioch
#4
A Place for Families
• Center Director: Deanna Gayles
• Administrative Assistant: Giselle Campos
• Bilingual Community Resource Specialist: Rocio Ceja
• Family and Community Liaison/Outreach: Monique Angara • Teachers: Bany Noguera Sanchez and Isis Dawson
• Father Engagement Specialist: Tyrell Burk and Lionel Blanson • Childcare Worker: Tierra Martin
Our Philosophy /Nuestra filosofía
• The parent is the child's first
t
eacher.
• The first 5 years are the
m
ost rapid period of brain
growth, with nearly 90% of
brain development occurring
by age 5.
• Los padres son los primeros
m
aestros del niño.
• Los p rimeros 5 años son el
período más rápido de
crecimiento cerebral, con casi
el 90% del desarrollo cerebral
que ocurre a los 5 años.
Registration / La Inscripción
• Cost is F REE
• New Family Registration Packet is
th
e only thing required to participate
in the program
• El p recio es GRATUITO
• Solo n ecesita un paquete de
inscripción de familias nuevas para
participar
Class Enrollment
• Classes are lottery based
• Offering online classes and
in-person classes
• Families are notified of
which classes they got into
the week before classes
start
• Las clases son basado en
loteria
• Ofreciendo clases en línea
y clases en persona
• Las familias reciben una
notificación de las clases
que tienen en la semana
antes de que comiencen
las clases
Class core areas
Las áreas
principales de
clase
•Our classes fall into these
core areas:
• Parent
Education/Support
• Evidence-Based
• Early Learning and
Literacy
• School Readiness
• Most classes are held
once a week and run for
6 weeks
• Parent/child classes =
one hour
• Nuestras clases se
centran en estas
áreas principales:
• La educación y el
apoyo de los padres
• Basado en la eviden
cia
• El aprendizaje
temprano y la
alfabetización
• La preparación
escolar
• La mayoría de las
clases son una vez a la
semana para 6
semanas.
• Clases de padre/niño =
una hora
Virtual Classes /
Clases Virtuales
• Las clases se imparten en Zoom
• La invitación a la clase llegará a su correo
electrónico.
• Tabletas disponibles para alquilar
• El centro proporciona material didáctico para
algunas de las clases de los niños
Virtual Class Tips
/ Consejos de clase virtual
• Make sure you pick up your packet on the
distribution date
• Create space for your child to take class
• Limit distractions as much as possible
• Asegúrese de recoger su paquete en la fecha
de distribución
• Cree un espacio para que su hijo tome clases
• Limite las distracciones tanto como sea posible
This Photo by Unknown author is licensed under CC BY-SA.
Sick policy:
• If you miss 2 classes without contacting
t
eachers/staff when session starts you will be
taken off the class roster
• Face Masks for kids and families are optional,
b
ut they will be provided if needed
Política de enfermedad:
• Si p ierde 2 clases sin comunicarse con el
maestro/personal cuando comience la
sesión, será eliminado de la lista de clases.
• Las más caras faciales para niños y familias
son opcionales, pero se proporcionarán si es
necesario.
Policies / Reglas
Events /
Eventos
A: Week of the Young Child
Event/Semana del Nino Evento
B: Reading Across America/Lectura a
Traves de America
C: Triple P Class Graduation/Graduacion
de la Clase de Triple P
D: Book Launch + Author Meet &
Greet/Presentacion de Libro + Conocer
y Saludar al Autor
A
B
C
D
Workshops / Talleres
• Workshops connect parents to resources within
the
community
• Workshops can be about a variety of topics
• Los t alleres conectan a los padres con los recursos dentro de la comunidad
• Los t alleres pueden ser sobre una variedad de
temas.
CRS-Community Resource Specialist
Especialista de
recurso comunitarios
ASQ-3
ASQ SE
Ages & Stages Questionnaire Cuestionario de edades y etapas • What is it?
• Questionnaire that look at
5 areas of development
• What's the purpose?
• To give more knowledge
about child development
• To bring awareness to
child's strengths and areas
that need more support
• To help teachers know
what class and activities
to recommend
• ¿Qué es?
• Cuestionario que se centra en
5 áreas del desarrollo
• ¿Cuál es el propósito?
• dar más conocimiento del des
-arrollo
• tener más conciencia de
los puntos fuertes y las áreas
que necesitan más apoyo
• Para ayudar a los maestros a
saber qué clase y actividades
recomendar
ASQ Link ASQ Link
CAC- Community
Advisory Council
Consejo Asesor
Comunitario
• Parent Leadership Group
• Surveys center families and
o
ther families in the
community and makes
recommendations to the
center based on research
• Grupo de liderazgo d e padres
• Encuesta a l as familias del centro
y otras familias en la comunidad y
hace recomendaciones al centro
basadas en la investigación.
Thank You!!!
Gracias!!!
100 General Fund
Non departmental
00411857 DIAMOND HILLS SPORT CLUB PAYROLL 80.00
00411877 IN SHAPE HEALTH CLUBS PAYROLL 368.99
00411881 LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NA PAYROLL 4,902.82
00411886 MUNICIPAL POOLING AUTHORITY PAYROLL 2,339.56
00411887 MUNICIPAL POOLING AUTHORITY PAYROLL 1,128.55
00411893 OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL NO 3 PAYROLL 4,761.00 00411897 PARS PAYROLL 6,496.90
00411900 RANEY PLANNING & MANAGEMENT INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 8,760.28 00411907 STATE OF CALIFORNIA PAYROLL 1,508.88
00411908 STATE OF CALIFORNIA PAYROLL 61.94
00411909 STATE OF CALIFORNIA PAYROLL 120.00
00411921 AFLAC INSURANCE PREMIUM 6,935.78
00411967 FIRE RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES INSURANCE PREMIUM 48,313.96 00412005 RANEY PLANNING & MANAGEMENT INC TREE REMOVAL PERMIT PLANNING 11,448.48 00947783 ANTIOCH PD SWORN MGMT ASSOC PAYROLL 660.00
00947784 ANTIOCH POLICE OFFICERS ASSOC PAYROLL 20,924.95 00947785 ANTIOCH PW EMPLOYEE'S ASSOC PAYROLL 2,345.00
00947793 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTIONS PAYROLL 45,035.67 00947796 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION PAYROLL 29,895.47 City Council
00411829 BANK OF AMERICA VARIOUS BUSINESS EXPENSES 1,975.62 City Attorney
00411838 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES COPIER LEASE 140.68
00411872 HANSON BRIDGETT LLP LEGAL SERVICES RENDERED 36,370.00 00411884 MEYERS NAVE LEGAL SERVICES RENDERED 27,178.74
00411934 BEST BEST AND KRIEGER LLP LEGAL SERVICES RENDERED 10,161.32 00411973 HANSON BRIDGETT LLP LEGAL SERVICES RENDERED 91,540.00 00411983 KRAMER WORKPLACE INVESTIGATIONS LEGAL SERVICES RENDERED 19,570.00 00411993 MEYERS NAVE LEGAL SERVICES RENDERED 30,766.50
00947788 COMPUTERLAND COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 4,036.64
City Manager
00411819 AMBIUS PLANT SERVICE 374.92
00411827 BAKER TILLY US LLP PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 720.00 00411829 BANK OF AMERICA VARIOUS BUSINESS EXPENSES 1,446.52 00411838 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES COPIER LEASE 140.69
City Clerk
00411814 ACCOUNTEMPS TEMP SERVICES 1,873.20
00411965 EIDEN, KITTY J MINUTES CLERK 1,562.50
00412024 TOTAL RECALL CAPTIONING CAPTIONING SERVICES 891.25 00947800 EIDIM GROUP, INC EQUIPMENT 6,380.96
Human Resources
00411830 BANK OF AMERICA VARIOUS BUSINESS EXPENSES 1,255.63 00411863 FEDEX SHIPPING 23.75
00411891 OFFICE DEPOT INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 849.60
00411911 STERICYCLE INC DOCUMENT SHREDDING SERVICES 580.52 00411944 CALIF DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FINGERPRINTS 554.00
CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT
FOR THE PERIOD OF
MARCH 15 - MARCH 28, 2024
FUND/CHECK#
Finance Accounting
Prepared by: Lyssette Reyes
4/4/2024 April 9, 2024Page 1
CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT
FOR THE PERIOD OF
MARCH 15 - MARCH 28, 2024
FUND/CHECK#
00411959 DIABLO LIVE SCAN LLC FINGERPRINTS 240.00
00411994 MUNN, LAWRENCE E CHECK REPLACEMENT 190.00
00412001 PEREIRA, SANDY W CHECK REPLACEMENT 250.00
00947794 UBEO BUSINESS SERVICES COPIER LEASE 791.28
Economic Development
00411829 BANK OF AMERICA VARIOUS BUSINESS EXPENSES 1,097.63 00411838 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES COPIER LEASE 140.68
00411850 CONWAY DATA INC MARKETING 15,000.00
00411976 HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS AND ASSOC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 9,220.00 00412020 SWEET, BRET ALEXANDER EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 25.00 Non Departmental
00411840 CELEBRATE ANTIOCH FOUNDATION CIVIC ENH GRANT 3,000.00 00411858 DOCUSIGN INC DOCUSIGN RENEWAL 2,760.00
00411861 EIDEN, KITTY J MINUTES CLERK 150.00
00411904 ROTARY CLUB OF THE DELTA CIVIC ENH GRANT 1,000.00 00411910 STEM4REAL CIVIC ENH GRANT 8,000.00
00411986 LIQUID DIAMOND INC REFUND OVERPAYMENT 687.50
00411990 MARIAH WILLIAMS CIVIC ENH GRANT 1,500.00
00411995 NICHOLE GARDNER CIVIC ENH GRANT 2,000.00
00412000 PACIFIC CREDIT SERVICES COLLECTION FEES 830.00 00412004 PYRO SPECTACULARS NORTH INC EVENT SUPPLIES 19,698.00 Public Works Administration
00411967 FIRE RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES INSURANCE PREMIUM 20.50 Public Works Street Maintenance
00411834 C AND J FAVALORA TRUCKING INC STREET PAVING 13,417.50 00411928 ANTIOCH BUILDING MATERIALS ASPHALT MATERIALS 19,142.16 00411987 LOWES COMPANIES INC PARTS 52.47
00411988 MANERI SIGN COMPANY SIGNS 806.77
00412019 SUPERCO SPECIALTY PRODUCTS. PAINT SUPPLIES 590.01 00947801 GRAINGER INC SUPPLIES 290.38
Public Works-Facilities Maintenance
00411933 BAY CITIES PYROTECTOR FIRE PERMIT REVIEW 632.00 00411977 HOME DEPOT, THE TOOLS AND HARDWARE 381.96
00411987 LOWES COMPANIES INC TOOLS AND HARDWARE 223.92
00412013 SIGNARAMA CUSTOM CITY OF ANTIOCH FLAGS 2,359.01 Public Works-Parks Maint
00411924 ALTA FENCE FENCE REPAIR 5,631.00
00411958 DC ELECTRIC GROUP INC ELECTRICAL REPAIR 4,347.75 00411999 OFFICE DEPOT INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 383.54
00412022 TERRACARE ASSOCIATES PARK MAINTENANCE 126,544.25 00412031 WATERSAVERS IRRIGATION IRRIGATION PARTS 2,104.30 Public Works-Median/General Land
00412022 TERRACARE ASSOCIATES LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 8,881.36 Police Administration
00411815 ADDINGTON, WILLIAM BRIAN TRAINING PER DIEM 276.00 00411824 ARROWHEAD 24 HOUR TOWING INC TOWING SERVICES 1,126.50 00411826 AXON ENTERPRISE INC EQUIPMENT & LICENSING FEES 251,423.43 00411832 BPS TACTICAL INC. EMPLOYEE VESTS 3,804.99
Finance Accounting
Prepared by: Lyssette Reyes
4/4/2024 April 9, 2024Page 2
CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT
FOR THE PERIOD OF
MARCH 15 - MARCH 28, 2024
FUND/CHECK#
00411836 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES COPIER LEASE 25.00
00411837 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES COPIER LEASE 28.20
00411841 CLONINGER, NAHLEEN R OT MEAL REIMBURSEMENT 31.30 00411842 CODE 3 WEAR PUBLIC SAFETY UNIFORMS 107.58
00411849 CC FAMILY JUSTICE ALLIANCE CONTRIBUTION 5,337.52 00411852 CRIME SCENE CLEANERS INC CLEANING SERVICES 260.00 00411854 CSI FORENSIC SUPPLY LLC SUPPLIES 338.99
00411859 DUFFY, ADAM JAMES TRAINING PER DIEM 222.00
00411862 EWART, ASHLEY MARIE EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 337.98 00411863 FEDEX SHIPPING 139.18
00411865 FLORES, VANESSA SOFIA TRAINING PER DIEM 222.00 00411866 FLYMOTION UAS INTERIOR 4,764.00
00411876 IBS OF TRI VALLEY PATROL BATTERIES 543.74
00411879 JEONG, JISEOK TRAINING PER DIEM 222.00
00411880 LC ACTION POLICE SUPPLY SAFETY MATERIALS 1,620.12 00411898 PERRY, APRIL TRAINING PER DIEM 222.00
00411899 PREFERRED ALLIANCE INC PRE-EMPLOYMENT TESTING 126.00 00411912 TRANSUNION RISK & ALT DATA DATABASE SUBSCRIPTION 106.60 00411913 VARNER, VICTORIA L EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 109.74 00411915 VIGIL JR, JOSEPH TRAINING PER DIEM 276.00
00411922 AIR SCIENCE USA LLC OFFICE FURNITURE 5,810.01
00411931 ARROWHEAD 24 HOUR TOWING INC TOWING SERVICES 7,712.25 00411945 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES COPIER LEASE 25.00
00411950 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY RANGE FEES 275.00
00411954 CORE PSYCHOLOGICAL CORPORATION BACKGROUND CHECK SERVICES 1,000.00 00411955 CRIME SCENE CLEANERS INC CLEAN CRIME SCENE 130.00 00411956 CRUMP INVESTIGATIONS BACKGROUND CHECK SERVICES 8,959.52 00411957 CSI FORENSIC SUPPLY LLC SUPPLIES 743.60
00411967 FIRE RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES INSURANCE PREMIUM 135.99 00411969 GALLS LLC EQUIPMENT 16.87
00411971 GRAHAM, AUSTIN JONATHAN TRAINING PER DIEM 370.00 00411972 GREEN, ROBERT A TRAINING PER DIEM 370.00
00411980 IBS OF TRI VALLEY BATTERIES 5.85
00411984 LEGAL UPDATES PUBLISHING COMPANY LEGAL UPDATES SUBSCRIPTION 4,800.00 00411985 LEXISNEXIS DATABASE SUBSCRIPTION 252.50
00411992 MEADS, KORINA M CHECK REPLACEMENT 16.80
00411996 NIEVES, RUDOLPH TRAINING PER DIEM 370.00
00412002 PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP INC, THE MEDICAL EXAMS 2,670.00 00412003 PERRY, APRIL TRAINING PER DIEM 207.00
00412006 REACH PROJECT INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 17,083.00 00412012 SHRED IT INC SHREDDING SERVICES 136.98
00412014 SOUZA MELLONE, MICHAEL C CHECK REPLACEMENT 187.00 00412015 SOUZA MELLONE, MICHAEL C TRAINING PER DIEM 222.00 00412017 STATE OF CALIFORNIA FINGERPRINTING SERVICES 460.00 00412028 VERIZON WIRELESS PATROL CAR MODEMS 3,048.76
00412029 VIGIL JR, JOSEPH TRAINING PER DIEM 222.00
00947787 CHAPLIN AND HILL INVESTIGATIVE INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES 7,850.00 00947788 COMPUTERLAND EQUIPMENT 1,759.45
Finance Accounting
Prepared by: Lyssette Reyes
4/4/2024 April 9, 2024Page 3
CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT
FOR THE PERIOD OF
MARCH 15 - MARCH 28, 2024
FUND/CHECK#
00947794 UBEO BUSINESS SERVICES COPIER USAGE 3,094.44
00947804 PITNEY BOWES INC METER LEASE 300.72
00947807 WILLIAMS SCOTSMAN INC EVIDENCE STORAGE 229.27
Police Community Policing
00411961 RETIREE ADVANCED DISABILITY PENSION 8,984.50
00411978 RETIREE ADVANCED DISABILITY PENSION 5,685.00
00411981 RETIREE ADVANCED DISABILITY PENSION 5,466.50
00412016 SP PLUS CORPORATION ANNUAL PO FOR FY23/24 21,636.32 00412030 VIGILANT SOLUTIONS, LLC SUBSCRIPTION FEES 5,000.00 Police Investigations
00411817 ALHAMBRA WATER SERVICES 127.90
00411847 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY EXTRADITION 485.00
00411951 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SART EXAM 1,700.00
00412021 T MOBILE USA INC INV EVIDENCE 150.00
PD Special Investigations Unit
00411963 EAN SERVICES LLC RENTAL VEHICLE 7,409.05
00411991 RETIREE ADVANCED DISABILITY PENSION 5,685.00
Police Communications
00411890 NET TRANSCRIPTS TRANSCRIPT SERVICES 136.20
00411948 COMCAST CONNECTION SERVICES 2,715.73
00411970 GLOBALSTAR USA SATELLITE PHONES 267.50
Police Facilities Maintenance
00411987 LOWES COMPANIES INC PARTS 442.40
00947798 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST INC ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 123.19 Youth Network Services
00411831 BANK OF AMERICA VARIOUS BUSINESS EXPENSES 3,068.06 00411835 CABRAL, MONSERRAT ACT MEETING REIMBURSEMENT 317.26 00411932 BANK OF AMERICA VARIOUS BUSINESS EXPENSES 249.59 00411941 BRIDGE BUILDERS TO THE NEW GEN GROUP SERVICES 10,000.00 00412009 RR TRANSITIONAL HOUSING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,386.00 00947789 DELL COMPUTER CORP COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 44.99
Housing and Homelessness
00411932 BANK OF AMERICA VARIOUS BUSINESS EXPENSES 35.00 00411968 FOCUS STRATEGIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,997.50 00412010 SHARE COMMUNITY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,044.00 PSCR Administration
00411831 BANK OF AMERICA VARIOUS BUSINESS EXPENSES 562.00 00411932 BANK OF AMERICA VARIOUS BUSINESS EXPENSES 273.50 00411946 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES COPIER LEASE 179.13
Community Development Administration
00947806 UBEO BUSINESS SERVICES COPIER LEASE 3,372.04
Community Development Land Planning Services
00411861 EIDEN, KITTY J MINUTES CLERK 525.00
00411900 RANEY PLANNING & MANAGEMENT INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,789.55 CD Code Enforcement
00411952 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY RECORDING FEES 80.00
PW Engineer Land Development
00411947 COASTLAND CIVIL ENGINEERING INSPECTION SERVICES 22,010.00 Finance Accounting
Prepared by: Lyssette Reyes
4/4/2024 April 9, 2024Page 4
CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT
FOR THE PERIOD OF
MARCH 15 - MARCH 28, 2024
FUND/CHECK#
206 American Rescue Plan Fund
Mayor's Apprenticeship Program
00411831 BANK OF AMERICA VARIOUS BUSINESS EXPENSES 998.73 Non Departmental
00411823 ANTIOCH MEDICAL SUPPLY CHECK REPLACEMENT 10,000.00 00411829 BANK OF AMERICA VARIOUS BUSINESS EXPENSES 28.83 00411882 LITTLE MANUELS RESTAURANT CHECK REPLACEMENT 15,000.00 209 RMRA Fund
Streets
00411937 BKF ENGINEERS INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5,685.00 214 Animal Services Fund
Animal Services
00411816 AIRGAS USA LLC VETERINARY SUPPLIES 370.69
00411843 COGENT SOLUTIONS AND SUPPLIES JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 525.12 00411860 EAST HILLS VETERINARY HOSPITAL VETERINARY SERVICES 189.25 00411874 HILLS PET NUTRITION PET FOOD 1,600.81
00411888 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY CO EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 1,718.11 00411914 VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY RESCUE CONCENTRATE 3,930.85 00411917 ZOETIS LLC VETERINARY SUPPLIES 2,226.31
00411967 FIRE RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES INSURANCE PREMIUM 102.02 00412023 TONY LA RUSSA'S ANIMAL RESCUE VETERINARY SERVICES 427.50 00947791 IDEXX LABORATORIES INC VETERINARY SERVICES 257.25 00947795 WILLIAMS SCOTSMAN INC STORAGE FEES 186.28
216 Park-In-Lieu Fund
Parks & Open Space
00411905 ROYSTON HANAMOTO ALLEY AND ABEY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 14,757.95 219 Recreation Fund
Non departmental
00411848 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SENIOR CENTER MEAL PROGRAM 11,173.00 00411870 GRACE BIBLE FELLOWSHIP DEPOSIT REFUND 150.00
00411918 ABUKARSH, NASEER DEPOSIT REFUND 267.00
00412011 SHEFFIELD, CRISTIE DEPOSIT REFUND 100.00
Nick Rodriguez Community Cent
00411833 BRADY INDUSTRIES JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 181.10
00411869 GANDIA, JUN CLYDE AQUINO EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 103.77 00411939 BRADY INDUSTRIES JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 81.42
00411977 HOME DEPOT, THE SUPPLIES 206.25
Senior Programs
00411820 AMERICAN STAGE TOURS SENIOR TRIP 890.00
00411828 BANK OF AMERICA VARIOUS BUSINESS EXPENSES 991.54 00411864 FLANAGAN, RHONDA FAYE EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 58.03 00411889 MYSENIORCENTER KEYTAGS 490.83
00411892 OG CHARTER AND TOURS LLC TRANSPORTATION 125.00 Recreation Sports Programs
00411853 CSI ERGONOMIC FURNITURE, INC OFFICE FURNITURE 818.20 00411867 FREDRICKSON, JON DEPOSIT REFUND 143.00
Finance Accounting
Prepared by: Lyssette Reyes
4/4/2024 April 9, 2024Page 5
CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT
FOR THE PERIOD OF
MARCH 15 - MARCH 28, 2024
FUND/CHECK#
Recreation-Comm Center
00411833 BRADY INDUSTRIES JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 31.80
00411883 MCCAULEY AGRICULTURAL & PEST PEST CONTROL 100.00 00411896 PARKINK UNIFORMS 965.05
00411935 BIG SKY LOGOS AND EMBROIDERY UNIFORMS 647.06
00411987 LOWES COMPANIES INC PARTS 60.89
00947803 LSA ASSOCIATES INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,508.45 Recreation Water Park
00411833 BRADY INDUSTRIES JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 94.52
00411894 ORIGINAL WATERMAN UNIFORMS 4,185.50
00411920 ADVANTAGE INDUSTRIAL SEWING UNIFORMS 275.00
00411923 ALPHA ECHO TRADING COMPANY, LLC LIFEJACKETS 1,187.02 00411926 AMERICAN RED CROSS LIFEGUARD RECERTIFICATION 275.00 00411982 KNORR SYSTEMS INC CHEMICALS 694.60
00411987 LOWES COMPANIES INC TOOLS AND HARDWARE 48.23
222 Measure C/J Fund
Streets
00411938 BOETHING TREELAND FARMS PLANTS 9,820.11
00412007 RECOLOGY BLOSSOM VALLEY ORGANICS DECORATIVE MULCH 17,523.78 00412022 TERRACARE ASSOCIATES LANDSCAPING SERVICES 42,108.41 00412031 WATERSAVERS IRRIGATION IRRIGATION PARTS 1,387.22 00947805 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY HOLDING GRAVEL 50.41
226 Solid Waste Reduction Fund
Solid Waste Used Oil
00411902 REPUBLIC SERVICES INC OIL & FILTER COLLECTION 1,668.25 Solid Waste
00411942 BUSCH SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL INC 3 SORT CONTAINERS 452.62 00411964 ECOHERO SHOW LLC, THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 600.00 229 Pollution Elimination Fund
Channel Maintenance Operation
00411924 ALTA FENCE FENCE REPAIR 654.00
00411987 LOWES COMPANIES INC SUPPLIES 153.18
251 Lone Tree SLLMD Fund
Lonetree Maintenance Zone 1
00412022 TERRACARE ASSOCIATES LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 4,911.58 Lonetree Maintenance Zone 2
00412022 TERRACARE ASSOCIATES LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 10,681.11 Lonetree Maintenance Zone 3
00412022 TERRACARE ASSOCIATES LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 9,162.86 Lonetree Maintenance Zone 4
00412022 TERRACARE ASSOCIATES LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 2,421.21 252 Downtown SLLMD Fund
Downtown Maintenance
00412022 TERRACARE ASSOCIATES LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 1,273.22 253 Almondridge SLLMD Fund
Almondridge Maintenance
00411895 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC CO ELECTRIC 265.68
00412022 TERRACARE ASSOCIATES LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 2,363.29 Finance Accounting
Prepared by: Lyssette Reyes
4/4/2024 April 9, 2024Page 6
CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT
FOR THE PERIOD OF
MARCH 15 - MARCH 28, 2024
FUND/CHECK#
254 Hillcrest SLLMD Fund
Hillcrest Maintenance Zone 1
00411924 ALTA FENCE FENCE REPAIR 12,049.00
00412022 TERRACARE ASSOCIATES LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 8,056.90 Hillcrest Maintenance Zone 2
00412022 TERRACARE ASSOCIATES LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 8,005.46 Hillcrest Maintenance Zone 4
00412022 TERRACARE ASSOCIATES LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 8,666.35 255 Park 1A Maintenance District Fund
Park 1A Maintenance District
00411845 COMCAST CONNECTION SERVICES 113.80
00412022 TERRACARE ASSOCIATES LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 1,396.23 256 Citywide 2A Maintenance District Fund
Citywide 2A Maintenance Zone 3
00412022 TERRACARE ASSOCIATES LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 1,466.85 Citywide 2A Maintenance Zone 4
00412022 TERRACARE ASSOCIATES LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 5,152.26 Citywide 2A Maintenance Zone 5
00412022 TERRACARE ASSOCIATES LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 2,381.42 Citywide 2A Maintenance Zone 6
00412022 TERRACARE ASSOCIATES LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 2,242.69 Citywide 2A Maintenance Zone 8
00412022 TERRACARE ASSOCIATES LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 4,070.43 Citywide 2A Maintenance Zone 9
00412022 TERRACARE ASSOCIATES LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 5,381.46 Citywide 2A Maintenance Zone10
00412007 RECOLOGY BLOSSOM VALLEY ORGANICS DECORATIVE MULCH 12,522.50 00412022 TERRACARE ASSOCIATES LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 2,581.23 259 East Lone Tree SLLMD Fund
Zone 1-District 10
00412022 TERRACARE ASSOCIATES LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 3,357.92 311 Capital Improvement Fund
Energy Efficiency
00411964 ECOHERO SHOW LLC, THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 600.00 569 Vehicle Replacement Fund
Equipment Maintenance
00411962 DOWNTOWN FORD SALES VEHICLE 200,247.18
570 Equipment Maintenance Fund
Non departmental
00411875 HUNT AND SONS INC FUEL 4,478.59
00411979 HUNT AND SONS INC FUEL 5,865.70
Equipment Maintenance
00411987 LOWES COMPANIES INC TOOLS AND HARDWARE 60.92
573 Information Services Fund
Network Support & PCs
00411821 AMS DOT NET INC LICENSING FEES 16,623.77
00411844 COMCAST CONNECTION SERVICES 318.14
00411948 COMCAST CONNECTION SERVICES 2,715.74
Finance Accounting
Prepared by: Lyssette Reyes
4/4/2024 April 9, 2024Page 7
CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT
FOR THE PERIOD OF
MARCH 15 - MARCH 28, 2024
FUND/CHECK#
00411949 COMCAST CONNECTION SERVICES 194.99
00411967 FIRE RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES INSURANCE PREMIUM 91.82 00412025 TREDENT DATA SYSTEMS INC ANNUAL SUPPORT 4,829.00 00947799 DIGITAL SERVICES WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 7,865.00
Telephone System
00411967 FIRE RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES INSURANCE PREMIUM 10.20 00947782 ALTURA COMMUNICATION SOLUTIONS LLC SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE 21,135.94 GIS Support Services
00411967 FIRE RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES INSURANCE PREMIUM 184.50 Office Equipment Replacement
00411821 AMS DOT NET INC WIRELESS INSTALLATION 2,469.50 00947782 ALTURA COMMUNICATION SOLUTIONS LLC SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE 1,670.40 00947788 COMPUTERLAND COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 254.18
00947789 DELL COMPUTER CORP COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 2,423.20 577 Post Retirement Medical-Police Fund
Non Departmental
00412034 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,885.82
00412044 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,477.26
00412048 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,885.82
00412050 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 492.58
00412052 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 492.58
00412053 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 96.74
00412054 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 492.58
00412056 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,783.68
00412057 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 709.38
00412058 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,885.82
00947809 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 492.58
00947810 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 2,498.67
00947811 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 108.33
00947815 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,189.20
00947816 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 404.78
00947818 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,885.82
00947819 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 654.66
00947823 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 492.58
00947825 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,885.82
00947831 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,021.41
00947832 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,885.82
00947837 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 492.58
00947839 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 873.00
00947841 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 739.30
00947845 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 654.66
00947856 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,557.12
00947857 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,268.03
00947862 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,885.82
00947863 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 873.00
00947864 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,885.82
00947878 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 492.58
00947879 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 739.30
Finance Accounting
Prepared by: Lyssette Reyes
4/4/2024 April 9, 2024Page 8
CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT
FOR THE PERIOD OF
MARCH 15 - MARCH 28, 2024
FUND/CHECK#
00947880 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 232.43
00947881 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,885.82
00947884 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 546.39
00947886 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,681.54
00947893 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 167.79
00947894 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 485.80
00947895 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,838.54
00947896 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,885.82
00947899 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 473.38
00947910 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,375.12
00947913 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 2,383.00
00947916 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 935.09
00947918 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 864.41
00947919 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 291.15
00947927 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,124.55
00947930 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,885.82
00947931 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 739.30
00947933 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 492.58
00947935 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,375.12
00947939 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 353.71
00947948 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 656.87
00947949 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 2,498.67
00947951 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,387.69
00947959 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,885.82
00947960 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,885.82
00947962 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 475.66
00947964 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 55.00
00947968 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 492.58
00947969 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,885.82
00947972 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 353.71
00947978 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 852.80
00947982 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 757.82
00947983 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 864.41
00947985 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 21.52
00947986 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,885.82
578 Post Retirement Medical-Misc Fund
Non Departmental
00412033 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 291.15
00412036 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 172.00
00412039 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 79.69
00412040 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 473.38
00412041 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 197.69
00412043 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 79.69
00412046 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 419.79
00412047 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 167.79
00412059 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 79.69
00412060 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 289.77
00412063 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 100.00
Finance Accounting
Prepared by: Lyssette Reyes
4/4/2024 April 9, 2024Page 9
CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT
FOR THE PERIOD OF
MARCH 15 - MARCH 28, 2024
FUND/CHECK#
00947808 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 316.38
00947812 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 709.38
00947814 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 316.38
00947817 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 316.38
00947822 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 76.69
00947827 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 552.38
00947830 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 316.38
00947833 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 197.69
00947834 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 552.38
00947835 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 316.38
00947838 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 552.38
00947843 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 354.69
00947846 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 316.38
00947849 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 79.69
00947852 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 79.69
00947855 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 79.69
00947858 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 552.38
00947859 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 552.38
00947860 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 316.38
00947861 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 552.38
00947868 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 709.38
00947869 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 79.69
00947870 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 132.11
00947871 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 110.00
00947872 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 552.38
00947876 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 316.38
00947877 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 79.69
00947887 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 79.69
00947888 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 79.69
00947892 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 79.69
00947898 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 79.69
00947903 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 197.69
00947904 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 316.38
00947905 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 316.38
00947907 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 316.38
00947908 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 316.38
00947915 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 79.69
00947921 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 197.69
00947925 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 709.38
00947926 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 79.69
00947928 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 42.00
00947932 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 316.38
00947936 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 79.69
00947938 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 79.69
00947942 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 79.69
00947947 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 316.38
00947950 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 79.69
00947955 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 79.69
Finance Accounting
Prepared by: Lyssette Reyes
4/4/2024 April 9, 2024Page 10
CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT
00947966 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 79.69
00947971 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 24.32
00947974 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 79.69
00947981 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 316.38
00947984 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 79.69
579 Post Retirement Medical-Mgmt Fund
Non Departmental
00412035 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 79.69
00412037 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,476.00
00412038 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 856.90
00412042 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 79.69
00412045 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 79.69
00412049 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 397.82
00412051 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 81.52
00412055 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 432.38
00412061 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 445.66
00412062 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 2,498.67
00412064 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 552.38
00947813 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 316.68
00947820 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 552.38
00947821 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 316.38
00947824 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 552.38
00947826 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 167.79
00947828 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 137.69
00947829 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 2,498.67
00947836 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 316.38
00947840 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 316.38
00947842 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 92.00
00947844 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 856.90
00947847 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 683.04
00947848 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 209.01
00947850 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 451.37
00947851 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 316.38
00947853 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 432.38
00947854 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 79.69
00947865 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 316.38
00947866 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 316.38
00947867 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 316.38
00947873 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 473.38
00947874 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 316.38
00947875 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 316.38
00947882 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 263.02
00947883 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 400.00
00947885 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 316.38
00947889 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 316.38
00947890 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 236.69
00947891 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 2,498.67
00947897 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 316.38
Finance Accounting
Prepared by: Lyssette Reyes
4/4/2024 April 9, 2024Page 11
CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT
FOR THE PERIOD OF
MARCH 15 - MARCH 28, 2024
FUND/CHECK#
00947900 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 316.38
00947901 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 316.38
00947902 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 316.38
00947906 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 654.66
00947909 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,164.42
00947911 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 609.06
00947912 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 316.38
00947914 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,681.54
00947917 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 291.15
00947920 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 137.69
00947922 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,885.82
00947923 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 316.38
00947924 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 316.38
00947929 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 79.69
00947934 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 864.41
00947937 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 79.69
00947940 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 316.38
00947941 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 316.38
00947943 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 79.69
00947944 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 137.69
00947945 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 856.90
00947946 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 197.69
00947952 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 316.38
00947953 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 316.38
00947954 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 79.69
00947956 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 263.02
00947957 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 683.04
00947958 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 316.38
00947961 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 432.38
00947963 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 273.42
00947965 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 79.69
00947967 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 552.38
00947970 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 110.00
00947973 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 316.38
00947975 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 79.69
00947976 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 316.38
00947977 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 2,471.54
00947979 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 79.69
00947980 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,987.00
611 Water Fund
Non departmental
00411936 BISHOP CO TOOLS 150.05
00411966 FASTENAL CO INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES 529.96
00412018 SUNRISE ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPLIES 623.61
00947801 GRAINGER INC SUPPLIES 831.98
Water Supervision
00411906 SEAN FRYXELL WATER REFUND CK REPLACEMENT 145.25 Water Production
Finance Accounting
Prepared by: Lyssette Reyes
4/4/2024 April 9, 2024Page 12
CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT
FOR THE PERIOD OF
MARCH 15 - MARCH 28, 2024
FUND/CHECK#
00411822 ANIMAL DAMAGE MANAGEMENT PEST CONTROL 425.00
00411825 AVEVA SELECT CALIFORNIA SOFTWARE RENEWAL 20,470.00 00411871 GUALCO GROUP INC, THE GOVERNMENT RELATION SERVICES 4,002.10 00411901 REINHOLDT ENGINEERING CONSTR TESTING SERVICES 495.00 00411916 WALTER BISHOP CONSULTING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,250.00 00411924 ALTA FENCE FENCE REPAIR 650.00
00411925 AMAYA SOLUTIONS INC CHEMICALS 15,144.80
00411929 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES SUPPLIES 108.34
00411940 BRENNTAG PACIFIC INC CHEMICALS 1,066.34
00411953 CONTRA COSTA WATER DISTRICT MAIN CANAL 946,814.96 00411974 HASA INC CHEMICALS 29,599.81
00411975 HAWTHORN VENTURES LLC UNIFORMS 829.50
00411977 HOME DEPOT, THE TOOLS AND HARDWARE 124.55
00411987 LOWES COMPANIES INC TOOLS 24.91
00411989 MARATHON POWER UNINTERRUPTED POWER SUPPLIES 2,476.00 00411998 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CA PRE-EMPLOYMENT MEDICAL 871.00 00412027 UNIVAR SOLUTIONS USA INC CHEMICALS 9,206.18
00412032 WILSON, DAVID EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 120.00
00947797 CHEMTRADE CHEMICALS US LLC CHEMICALS 15,296.02 Water Distribution
00411813 ACCOUNTEMPS TEMP HELP 798.40
00411821 AMS DOT NET INC CABLING 127.32
00411834 C AND J FAVALORA TRUCKING INC TRUCKING AND RECYCLING SERVICE 11,020.00 00411851 CRESCO EQUIPMENT RENTALS EQUIPMENT RENTAL 4,136.20 00411878 ISINGS CULLIGAN WATER SERVICES 42.15
00411919 ACCOUNTEMPS TEMP HELP 802.29
00411943 C AND J FAVALORA TRUCKING INC TRUCKING AND RECYCLING SERVICE 18,352.50 00411966 FASTENAL CO INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES 603.12
00411975 HAWTHORN VENTURES LLC UNIFORMS 554.00
00411987 LOWES COMPANIES INC PARTS 2,288.15
00411997 NA CA BACKFLOW PREVENTION ASSOC BACKFLOW TRAINING CLASS 1,320.00 00412000 PACIFIC CREDIT SERVICES COLLECTION FEES 68.67
00412008 ROBERTS AND BRUNE CO MISCELLANEOUS WATER FITTINGS 354.74 00412026 ULINE FACILITY SUPPLIES 299.18
00947792 INFOSEND INC PRINT AND MAIL SERVICES 13,741.97 00947801 GRAINGER INC SAFETY SUPPLIES 323.98
00947802 INFOSEND INC PRINT AND MAIL SERVICES 2,231.04
Public Buildings & Facilities
00411839 CDM SMITH INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 157,012.21 00411855 CSI METRICS LLC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 22,017.76 00411873 HB CONSULTING GROUP INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 21,185.00 00947786 CAROLLO ENGINEERS INC ENGINEERING SERVICES 81,192.46 621 Sewer Fund
Swr-Wastewater Administration
00411813 ACCOUNTEMPS TEMP HELP 798.40
00411818 ALTA FENCE FENCE REPAIR 3,448.00
00411821 AMS DOT NET INC CABLING 127.31
00411834 C AND J FAVALORA TRUCKING INC TRUCKING AND RECYCLING SERVICE 11,020.00 Finance Accounting
Prepared by: Lyssette Reyes
4/4/2024 April 9, 2024Page 13
CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT
FOR THE PERIOD OF
MARCH 15 - MARCH 28, 2024
FUND/CHECK#
00411856 CWEA SFBS CERTIFICATION FEES 108.00
00411878 ISINGS CULLIGAN WATER SERVICE 42.15
00411885 MSA SAFETY INCORPORATED MULTI-GAS DETECTORS 4,951.92 00411903 ROBERTS AND BRUNE CO SUPPLIES 5,969.31
00411919 ACCOUNTEMPS TEMP HELP 802.29
00411927 AMERICAN TEXTILE AND SUPPLY INC SEWER CONTAINMENT SUPPLIES 377.54 00411943 C AND J FAVALORA TRUCKING INC TRUCKING AND RECYCLING SERVICE 18,352.50 00411960 DKF SOLUTIONS GROUP LLC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 109.00 00411967 FIRE RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES INSURANCE PREMIUM 557.49 00411987 LOWES COMPANIES INC TOOLS 623.49
00947792 INFOSEND INC PRINT AND MAIL SERVICES 13,742.05 00947802 INFOSEND INC PRINT AND MAIL SERVICES 2,231.04
631 Marina Fund
Marina Administration
00411846 COMCAST CONNECTION SERVICES 698.11
00411868 FURBER SAW INC PARTS 172.24
00411924 ALTA FENCE FENCE REPAIR 520.00
00411987 LOWES COMPANIES INC SUPPLIES 232.27
00411999 OFFICE DEPOT INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 63.86
00412022 TERRACARE ASSOCIATES PARK MAINTENANCE 758.00
00947790 GRAINGER INC SUPPLIES 138.42
Finance Accounting
Prepared by: Lyssette Reyes
4/4/2024 April 9, 2024Page 14
___ D ___
Agenda Item #
STAFF REPORT
TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: Regular Meeting of April 9, 2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and Me mbers of the City Council
SUBMITTED BY: Dawn Merchant, Finance Director
APPROVED BY: Brad Helfenberger, Acting Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: Increase of Purchase Order with Ty ler Technologies for Utility Billing
RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution approving an increase to the purchase order with Tyler Technologies for $150,000 in fiscal year 2024 and $150,000 in fiscal year 2025 for utility billing services.
FISCAL IMPACT
The cost of utility billing services, which includes annual software hosting, billing, maintenance, and electronic payment transaction fees is included in the Water and Sewer Enterprise FY2023-25 adopted budgets.
DISCUSSION
The City of Antioch utilizes Incode Utility Billing Software provided by Tyler Technologies for its utility billing processes which includes software hosting fees, bill generation, maintenance fees and electroni c payment transaction fees. In prior years, the City maintained separate purchase orders with Tyle r Technologies based on each particular service under the City contract, of which m any fell under the City Council threshold for approval. Beginning with fisca l year 2024, the City combined all utility billing related services under one purchase order for ease of tracking and reconciliation, however, the new combined total amount of all services provided was inadvertently excluded from the “Summary of Annual Recurring Purchase Order s and/or Contracts” detailed in the “Financial Summaries” section of the adopted FY2023-25 Budget; the amount listed and approved for the contract in FY2023/24 was $180,000 and $189,000 for FY2024/25 (refer to Attachment B, p. 2). In order to capture the entire cost of services, the fiscal year 2024 and fiscal year 2025 approved purchase orders need to be increased by $150,000 in each fiscal year. The amount in each fiscal year is included in the adopted Water and Sewer Fund budgets.
Antioch City Council Report
April 9, 2024
Agenda Item #D 2
ATTACHMENTS
A. Resolution
B. Financial Summaries Pages from Adopted FY2023-25 Budget
ATTACHMENT A
RESOLUTION NO. 2024/
RESOLUT
ION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANTIOCH APPROVING A
PURCHASE ORDER INCREASE WITH TYLER TECHNOLOGIES IN THE AMOUNT OF $150,000 IN FISCAL YEAR 2024 AND $150,000 IN FISCAL YEAR 2025 FOR
UTILITY BILLING SERVICES
WHEREAS, the City currently utilizes Incode Utility Billing Software provided by Tyler Technologies;
WHEREAS, the “Summary of Annual Recurring Purchase Orders and/or Contracts” approved in the adopted FY2023-25 budget included purchase order approval to Tyler Technologies/Incode in the amount of $180,000 in 2023-24 and $189,000 in 2024-25; and
WHEREAS, the amount of the approved purchase order in the FY2023-25 budget excluded certain fees included in the overall contract for utility billing services and the purchase order needs to be increased by $150,000 in each fiscal year in order to represent the full contract cost and in order to pay the vendor.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Antioch hereby approves an increase to the purchase order with Tyler Technologies in the amount of $150,000 in fiscal year 2024 and $150,000 in fiscal year 2025 for utility billing services.
* * * * * * * I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Antioch at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 9th day of April 2024, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAINED:
ABSENT:
__________________________________
ELIZABETH HOUSEHOLDER
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANTIOCH
2023-25 OPERATING BUDGET
FINANCIAL SUMMARIES
51 Summary o
f Annual Recurring Purchase Orders and/or Contracts
2023-24 2024-25
Budgeted Budgeted
Vendor Amount Amount Product/Service Description Fund Antioch Auto Parts $65,000 $65,000 Vehicle parts Vehicle Fund Arrowhead Tow 60,000 60,000 Towing & evidence vehicle storage on as needed basis General Fund Badger Meter 1,500,000 1,500,000 Sole source for water meter and parts Water Fund Chaplin & Hill 60,000 60,000 Outside investi gator – Police Department General Fund Contra Costa County 170,000 170,000 CAL-ID , City of Antioch portion General Fund Contra Costa County 260,000 260,000 Lab test ing for Police Department General Fund Contra Costa County-Public Works 375,000 375,000 Traffic Signal Maintenance General Fund County Asphalt 79,000 79,000 Secondary asphalt & rock supplier Various Delta Diablo 124,000 124,000 Hazardous waste collection & disposal Sewer/Solid Waste East Bay Hills Vet Hospital 80,000 80,000 Emergen cy veterinary services Animal Control Fund Honeywell International 75,000 75,000 Additional HVAC repairs on as needed basis Various Mark 43 187,693 0 CAD/RMS (ant icipated transition to new provider in FY24) General Fund SP Plus Corporation 260,000 260,000 Pa rking Enforcement General Fund Grainger 100,000 100,000 Various Public Works goods & supplies Various Jack Doheny Supplies 65,000 65,000 Sole so urce supplier for CCTV Truck Water/Sewer Office Depot 100,000 100,000 Office Supplies Various
PFM 140,000 145,000 Investment Advisor General Fund
San Diego Police Equipment 75,000 75,000 Various pol ice equipment on as needed basis General Fund East Bay Regional Communications
System Authority 200,000 200,000 EBRCS upgrade radio softw are encryption/installation and maintenance General Fund DKF Solutions 75,000 75,000 Training for City employees Sewer Central Square Inc/OneSolution 293,486 308,161 ASP (Hos ting) service for financial software General Fund Granite 100,000 100,000 Sole source EZ asphalt bulk delivery Various 2023-25 OPERATING BUDGET
FINANCIAL SUMMARIES
52 2023-24 2024-25
Budgeted Budgeted
Vendor Amount Amount Product/Service Description Fund NTU Technologies $50,000 $50,000 Proprietary chemical for water treatment Water Polydyne Inc 50,000 50,000 Proprietary chemical for water treatment Water ICR Electrical 50,000 50,000 Backup and em ergency electrical support to WTP Wate r Alta Fence 50,000 50,000 Provide emer gency repair for WTP facilities Wate r Delta Fence 50,000 50,000 Provide emergency repair for WTP facilities Wate r Cummins West 50,000 50,000 Provide emergen cy repair service for backup generators Wate r Koffler Pump 50,000 50,000 Provide emergen cy repair service for backup generators Wate r Antioch Building Materials 300,000 300,000 Local source of asphalt material Various SiteOne Landscape 250,000 250,000 Sole so urce irrigation controllers Various Interstate Sales 50,000 50,000 Thermoplasti c for street maintenance General Fund Borges & Mahoney 50,000 50, 000 Instrumentation Wate r
Peterson Tractor 50,000 50,000 General maintenance and e quipment rentals Various Watersavers Irrigation 100,000 100,000 Irrigation parts Various Amazon Business Solutions 50,000 50,000 Office supplies Various Tyler Technologies/Incode 180,000 189,000 Utility billing software – hosting and transaction fees Water/Sewer Tyler Technologies/ELP 190,000 190,000 Energov/ELP Co mmunity Development permitting software General Fund Data Ticket Inc. 50,000 50,000 Citation processing, collections and hearing correspondence General Fund Lowe’s 75,000 75,000 Materials and supplies on as needed basis Various Axon/Evidence.com 251,423 251,423 BWC and di gital evidence storage General Fund EAN/Enterprise 100,000 100,000 Undercover vehicles, traini ng vehicle rentals and temp vehicles General Fund Giordano Consulting 50,000 50,000 Outside investigator – Police Department General Fund MWI Veterinary Supply 75,000 75,000 Veterinary supplies Animal Control Fund Peregrine Technologies 92,250 200,000 Analysis platform, E-File DA General Fund Public Safety Family Counseling 75,000 75,000 Psychological services & support General Fund Serological Institute 75,000 75,000 DNA analysis General Fund ShotSpotter 280,000 280,000 Gunshot detection General Fund
DATE:
TO:
SUBMITTED BY:
APPROVED BY:
SUBJECT:
C:: ITV OF
ANTIOCH
CALIFORNIA
STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting of April 9, 2024
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Shaun Connelly, Water Distribution Superintendent
Scott Buenting, Acting Public Works Director/City Engineer t/l' Resolution to Approve an Increase to the Purchase Order for Grainger and Increase the amount on the Recurring Purchase Order List
RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution:
1. Approving an increase to the FY 2023/24 purchase order with Grainger Inc. in the amount of $50,000 for a total amount not to exceed $150,000;
2. Approving an increase to the annual recurring purchase order in the amount of $50,000 not to exceed $150,000; and
3. Authorizing the Acting City Manager to execute the increase to the purchase order.
FISCAL IMPACT
Adoption of this resolution will increase the purchase order for Grainger Inc. in the amount of $50,000 for a total of $150,000. Sufficient funding for this increase is included in the 2023-25 adopted budget throughout various funds that utilize this vendor.
DISCUSSION
Various departments utilize Grainger Inc. on an as-needed and emergency basis to procure supplies and materials necessary to perform essential activities. Staff is requesting an amendment to the existing purchase order to continue to purchase necessary items and tools to complete work throughout the City. Grainger maintains a local Concord branch and is convenient and accessible to City staff. Grainger provides items such as batteries for lights for night work, tools (chain saws, chains, wrenches, sockets), safety equipment (leather/nitrile gloves, face shields, safety vests & glasses, first aid replacement items), apparel (rain jackets and pants, rubber boots), and vehicle repair equipment to include vehicle 2-way radios and keyed tool boxes. As the fleet increases, larger boxes need to be installed and for older vehicles the boxes need to be replaced due to wear and tear.
F
Agenda Item #
Antioch City Council Report
April 9, 2024 Agenda Item #F
ATTACHMENTS
A. Resolution
2 ATTACHMENT "A"
RESOLUTION NO. 2024/xxx
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANTIOCH
APPROVING AN INCREASE TO THE PURCHASE ORDER WITH GRAINGER INC.
AND APPROVING AN INCREASE TO THE ANNUAL RECURRING PURCHASE
ORDER LIST
WHEREAS, various City departments utilize Grainger on an as-needed and emergency basis to acquire supplies and materials necessary to perform essential activities;
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered increasing the purchase order for Grainger Inc. in the amount of $50,000 for a total amount of $150,000; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered increasing the amount of the annual recurring purchase order list for Grainger Inc. in the amount of $50,000 for a total amount of $150,000.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Antioch, hereby:
1. Approves an increase to the FY 2023/24 purchase order with Grainger Inc. in the amount of $50,000 for a total amount not to exceed $150,000;
2. Approves an increase to the annual recurring purchase order in the amount of $50,000 not to exceed $150,000; and
3. Authorizes and the Acting City Manager to execute the increase to the purchase order.
* * * * * * *
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Antioch at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 9th day of April 2024, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ELIZABETH HOUSEHOLDER
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANTIOCH
DATE:
TO:
SUBMITTED BY:
APPROVED BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF
ANTIOCH
CALIFORNIA
STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting of April 9, 2024
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jason Bonilla, Operations Supervisor
Scott Buenting, Acting Public Works Director/City Engineer� Second Amendment to the Maintenance Services Agreement with Lee's Building Maintenance Company for Citywide Janitorial Services
RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution:
1. Approving a second amendment to the maintenance services agreement with Lee's Building Maintenance Company for citywide janitorial services in the amount of $50,000 for a total contract amount of $708, 180; and
2. Authorizing the Acting City Manager to execute the second amendment to the agreement with Lee's Building Maintenance Company in a form approved by the City Attorney.
FISCAL IMPACT
Adoption of this resolution will increase the maintenance services agreement with Lee's Building Maintenance Company for citywide janitorial services in the amount of $50,000 for a total contract amount of $708,180. Funding for this action is included in the various fiscal year 2023/24 Operating Budgets within the General Fund.
DISCUSSION
On June 26, 2019, the City Council awarded a contract to Lee's Building Maintenance Company for citywide janitorial services. On July 24, 2019, the City Council approved the first amendment to the agreement with Lee's Building Maintenance Company. This included additional window and restroom cleaning services for City Hall, Antioch Police Department, and Public Works Maintenance Service Center.
This second amendment to the agreement will provide funding for extra janitorial services that were identified by staff and implemented by Lee's Building Maintenance Company at the following locations: Police Department, City Hall, Public Safety and Community Resources offices, as well as disinfection of offices as requested throughout the City's G
Agenda Item #
Antioch City Council Report
April 9, 2024 Agenda Item #G 2
facilities. Staff recommends the approval of this second amendment to Lee's Building Maintenance Company to continue these extra services through the remaining term of the contract, to June 30, 2024.
ATTACHMENTS
A. Resolution
Exhibit 1. Lee's Building Maintenance Company Second Amendment Exhibit 2. Lee's Building Maintenance Company Maintenance Services Agreement
ATTACHMENT "A"
RESOLUTION NO. 2024/xxx
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANTIOCH
APPROVING A SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT WITH LEE'S
BUILDING MAINTENANCE COMPANY FOR CITYWIDE JANITORIAL SERVICES AND INCREASING THE CONTRACT AMOUNT BY $50,000 FOR A TOTAL AMOUNT NOT EXCEED $708,180 AND AUTHORIZING THE ACTING CITY MANAGER TO
EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, on June 26, 2019, the City Council awarded a contract to Lee's Building Maintenance Company for citywide janitorial services; WHEREAS, on July 24, 2019, the City Council approved the first amendment to the agreement with Lee's Building Maintenance Company, which included additional window and restroom cleaning services for City Hall, Antioch Police Department, and Public Works Maintenance Center;
WHEREAS, this second amendment to the agreement will provide funding for citywide janitorial services at the City Hall, the Police Department, and Public Safety and Community Resources Department as well as disinfection of offices upon request throughout the City's facilities;
WHEREAS, staff recommends the approval of this second amendment to Lee's Building Maintenance Company service agreement to continue these citywide services through the remaining term of the contract until June 30, 2024; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered authorizing a second amendment to increase the maintenance services agreement with Lee's Building Maintenance Company for citywide janitorial services in the amount of $50,000 for a total contract amount not to exceed $708, 180.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Antioch, hereby:
1. Approves a second amendment to the maintenance services agreement with Lee's Building Maintenance Company for citywide janitorial services in the amount of $50,000.00 for a total contract amount of $708,180.00; and
2. Authorizes the Acting City Manager to execute the second amendment to the agreement with Lee's Building Maintenance Company in a form approved by the City Attorney.
* * * * * * *
RESOLUTION NO. 2024/_,
April 9, 2024
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Antioch at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 9th day of April 2024, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ELIZABETH HOUSEHOLDER
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANTIOCH
EXHIBIT "1"
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE
MAINTENANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR
JANITORIAL SERVICES RFP NO. 910-0529-19A
THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT FOR JANITORIAL
SERVICES RFP NO. 910-0529-24A is entered into as of this 9th day of April 2024, by and between the CITY OF ANTIOCH, a municipal corporation with its principal place of business at 200 H Street, Antioch California 94509 ("City") and Lee's Building Maintenance Company ("Contractor"), with its principal place of business at PO Box 2542, Martinez, CA 94553.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, on June 26, 2019, the City and Contractor entered into a Maintenance Services Agreement for janitorial services ("Agreement") in the amount not to exceed $558,180; WHEREAS, on June 24, 2019, the City and Contractor entered into the first amendment to expand the scope of the Agreement to include daily cleaning services to new locations at City Hall and Council Chambers for an additional $7,200 per year, and to include annual window washing services at City Hall and Council Chambers, Public Works, and Police and Animal Services for $8,450 per year; the total compensation for the Agreement was increased to $658,100.00; and
WHEREAS, on April 9, 2024, the City Council has considered a second amendment with Contractor increasing the total compensation of the Agreement in the amount of $50,000 for a total amount not to exceed $708, 180, to provide monthly maintenance services and additional sanitization services for the remainder of the contract term.
1. 2.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES DO MUTUALLY AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1 "Services to be Performed" shall be amended to read as follows:
"1. Services to be Performed. The work will consist of providing Janitorial Service Bid No. 910-0529-19A services for the City of Antioch described further in Exhibit A and B, Exhibit A to Amendment No. 1 and Exhibit A to Amendment No. 2 which is hereby attached and incorporated by reference into this Agreement." Section 2 "Compensation" shall be amended to read as follows:
"2. Compensation. The total compensation shall not exceed $708,180, with the details set forth in Exhibit A and B. Exhibit A to Amendment No. 1 and Exhibit A to Amendment No. 2 which is hereby attached and incorporated by reference into this Agreement."
All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
SIGNATURE PAGE FOR
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE
MAINTENANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR
JANITORIAL SERVICES RFP NO. 910-0529-19A
CITY OF ANTIOCH LEE'S BUILDING MAINTENANCE COMPANY
By: ___________ _
Kwame P. Reed
Acting City Manager
ATTEST:
Elizabeth Householder,
City Clerk of the City of Antioch
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Thomas Lloyd Smith
City Attorney
By: ____________
Josh Sparks, Owner
6 Agenda Item #
STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: Regular Meeting of April 9, 2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
SUBMITTED BY: Kevin Valente, Contract Planner
Raney Planning & Management, Inc.
APPROVED BY: Kevin Scudero, Acting Community Development Director SUBJECT: Leung Preliminary Development Plan
RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended the City Council provide feedback to the applicant and staff regarding the proposal and provide direction to the applicant for the Final Development Plan submittal.
FISCAL IMPACT
The development of the Leung Project will be fully funded by the applicant, Richland Communities. The City will incur no costs in the development.
DISCUSSION
Request
The applicant, Kyle Masters, Richland Communities, requests Preliminary Development Plan review of a proposal to construct a 435-unit residential development over a 160-acre vacant project site (APNs 057-041-013, 057-041-015, 057-041-016). The proposed project includes the development of 50 conventional single family detached units, 385 clustered single family detached residential units, and 159 row townhomes. The project also includes a recreation center, two neighborhood parks, and walking trails. Primary site access would be from Sand Creek Road. The applicant's project description is provided as Attachment A.
Environmental
Preliminary Development Plan review is a non-entitlement action and does not require environmental review. The future project application review would require compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Antioch City Council Report
April 9, 2024 Agenda Item #6 2
Background
The 160-acre vacant project site located within the 2,700-acre Sand Creek Focus Area formerly known as FUA-1 located in the southern portion of the City of Antioch on the south side of Sand Creek and to the east of Deer Valley Road. The Sand Creek Focus Area of the General Plan contains lands designated by the Antioch General Plan for open space, residential, commercial, and mixed-use development. Per the City’s General Plan, the site is designated Estate and Executive Residential/Open Space. The site is zoned Study Area (S).
Location Map
Project Location
Antioch City Council Report
April 9, 2024 Agenda Item #6 3
Sand Creek Focus Area Map
Residential developments within the Sand Creek Focus Area are intended to be a range of housing types, including upper income estate housing, golf course-oriented age- restricted housing for seniors, suburban single-family detached housing for families or for seniors, and multifamily development. The applicant would be requesting a General Plan land use amendment to Low Density Residential (LDR), Medium Low Density Residential (MLDR), Medium Density Residential (MDR), and rezone to Planned Development (PD).
It should be noted that the City of Antioch has approved previous General Plan Amendments for individual projects located within the Sand Creek Focus Area.
The Promenade/Vineyards at Sand Creek project to the east contains small residential lot sizes that was accomplished through a General Plan Amendment applying the MLDR designation, which as well as the Aviano project included a General Plan Amendment to allow the lots to be market rate single family housing rather than senior housing. The Creekside Vineyards project included the approval of a General Plan text amendment to the Sand Creek Focus Area of the General Plan to allow single family units on small lots that are not age restricted.
The Albers Ranch project also includes a proposed General Plan Amendment to the land use map for the Sand Creek Focus Area of the General Plan to change the portion of that site currently designated Hillside, Estate and Executive Residential/Open Space to Medium Low Density Residential/Open Space. In addition, the Albers Ranch project also includes a proposed General Plan Amendment to the text of the Sand Creek Focus Area of the General Plan to add a sub area to the Sand Creek Focus Area called the Albers
Antioch City Council Report
April 9, 2024 Agenda Item #6 4
Ranch Sub Area. The Albers Ranch Sub Area only affects the Albers Project site and not the Leung Project. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been prepared for the Albers Ranch Project and may be before the Planning Commission and City Council this year.
Furthermore, The Ranch project located directly north of this proposed project created a Limited Development Area and a Restricted Development Area and had extensive text amendments to the Sand Creek Focus Area of the General Plan to reflect the elimination of the golf course and a General Plan Amendment to the Land Use Map to change the land use designations of that project site to LDR, MLDR, Mixed Use, Public/Quasi Public, and Open Space. The Circulation Element of the General Plan was also amended to shift the proposed alignment of Dallas Ranch Road and its connection to Sand Creek Road north of Sand Creek.
The requested General Plan Amendment to LDR, MLDR, and MDR as part of this proposed project would result in similar densities as the other approved projects.
The proposed project application was submitted to the City in January 2023 and staff determined the application was complete in November 2023 and was routed to City Departments and outside agencies for review. Planning and Engineering staff, PG&E and the East Bay Regional Park District (EBRPD) have provided comments on the proposed project (see Attachment C).
The purpose of a Preliminary Development Plan is to gather feedback from the City Council and others in order for the applicant to become aware of concerns and/or issues prior to Final Development Plan and Tentative Map Submittal. As standard practice, preliminary plans are not conditioned; rather a list of needed items, information, and issues to be addressed is compiled for the applicant to address prior to submitting an entitlement application.
ANALYSIS
Project Overview
The Leung Project site consists of three properties totaling 160 acres. A portion of the previously approved The Ranch Project is north of the project site and consists of designated open space followed by MLDR. Rural single-family residential and vacant Antioch School District property is located to the east of the project site and the area to the south and west of the site consists of undeveloped land. The area south is outside Costa
County.
The applicant is proposing a 435-unit residential development with an overall density of
2.72 dwelling units per acre. The project would consist of 50 conventional single family detached units, 385 clustered single family detached residential units, and 159 row townhomes. The conventional single-family lots are proposed to have a minimum lot size Antioch City Council Report
April 9, 2024 Agenda Item #6 5
of 4,500 square feet (sf). Both types of cluster developments are proposed to consist of eight single- -pack
sf and 26,600 sf respectively. The project also includes a recreation center, two neighborhood parks, and walking trails.
New wet and dry utility extensions are proposed to serve the project. A sanitary sewer development to the north. The sewer and potable water stubs are proposed to extend with the bridge crossing over Sand Creek and into the project site. The proposed sanitary sewer system would be a gravity system connecting to the provided stub and flow towards rom The
Ranch development to create a looped system within the proposed project. The stormwater is proposed to be captured in a storm drainage system and conveyed towards the eastern edge of the site. The storm system is proposed to be discharged to a stormwater basin located in the northeastern corner for detention and treatment. The treated stormwater is proposed to be discharged through an approved outfall structure into Sand Creek to the north. Dry utilities such as electric, gas, telecom and cable are also proposed to be extended to serve the project.
Consistency with the General Plan and Zoning
The Sand Creek Focus Area currently designates the project site Estate and Executive Residential/Open Space. Estate & Executive Residential/Open Space land uses intend to serve as a transition between urban and rural areas and for areas that are not suited for a more intensive form of development because of topography, geologic conditions, or urban service limitations. The Estate & Executive Residential/Open Space land use designation is generally used for single-family detached units on of 0.5-acre lots or more, with a maximum density of two dwelling units per developable acre.
As mentioned previously, the project site is requesting a General Plan Amendment to the land use map from Estate & Executive Residential/Open Space to LDR, MLDR and MDR.
Areas designated as LDR and MLDR are intended for single-family homes. MLDR is characterized in the General Plan as a typical subdivision, as well as other detached housing such as zero lot line units and patio homes. Areas designated as MLDR are typically located on level terrain with relatively few geological or environmental constraints. The maximum allowable density is six dwelling units per acre. The MDR designation has a wide range of living accommodations, such as conventional single- family dwellings, multi-family townhouses, and apartment developments, which should include generous amounts of public or open space for active and passive recreational uses.
The maximum allowable density in the LDR land use designation is four du/ac, the MLDR land use designation allows up to six du/ac and the maximum allowable density in the MDR land use designation is ten du/ac. The current proposed gross density for the entire Antioch City Council Report
April 9, 2024 Agenda Item #6 6
project site would be 2.72 du/ac, which is below the maximum densities allowed for the LDR, MLDR, and MDR General Plan designations.
According to the General Plan, achievement of maximum densities within the Sand Creek Focus Area is not guaranteed nor implied. The final density is determined by development design, any onsite constraints such as physical or environmental, available infrastructure, and other factors.
The project site is zoned S allowing for uses that have otherwise been allowed under the General Plan directs be updated or revised either by one or more specific plans or master development plans when a site within the Sand Creek Focus Area is proposed for development. In 2005, the City Council adopted an Alternate Planning Process for the Sand Creek Focus Area. The process requires the submittal of a rezone to PD, including submittal of a Master Development Plan. Therefore, the project would require a request to rezone the project site from S to PD. The PD district is intended to accommodate a wide range of residential, commercial, and industrial land uses which are mutually supportive and compatible with existing and proposed developments on surrounding properties. Once rezoned, the PD district would establish its own specific development standards for the area within its respective boundaries, with its own specific development standards, including lot size, yard setbacks, and building height requirements.
Staff recommends that the City Council consider whether a General Plan land use amendment to allow the proposed residential product type is the most appropriate for the site or if they would prefer to see a different type of residential product (i.e. a denser multi- family development).
Zoning Standards
The proposed detached cluster residential development includes five-foot side, rear, and front yard setbacks. The proposed attached townhome residential development would include varying front yard setbacks of five feet to 18 feet, zero side yard setbacks, and approximately five to ten-foot rear yard setbacks.
For comparison, staff reviewed the existing development standards in the citywide R-4, R-6, and R-10 residential districts. Both R-4 and R-6 districts have a 35-foot maximum height requirement, 6,000-sf minimum lot size, and a 40 percent maximum lot coverage.
The R-10 district has a 45-foot maximum height requirement. All three citywide districts have a minimum 20-foot front yard setback. The conventional single-family lots are proposed to have a minimum lot size of 4,500 sf.
Staff recommends that the City Council provide feedback on the proposed lot clusters and make recommendations on any modifications they would like to see implemented.
Antioch City Council Report
April 9, 2024 Agenda Item #6 7
Site Layout and Design
In August of 2023, the City of Antioch adopted citywide Single-Family and Missing Middle Residential Objective Design Standards relating to all aspects of residential projects including building siting, architectural style, parking, and landscaping. The submittal of the Objective Design Standards Checklist will be required at the time of the Design Review application to illustrate compliance in the future. The Objective Design Standards Checklist will include relevant guidelines, how the project complies with them, and a detailed discussion of the issues.
Building Siting and Massing
adjacent streets with varying setbacks to present an attractive façade to the right-of-way.
The proposed plans show the potential plotting of the cluster single-family residences in two forms, the hammerhead cluster and the 8-pack cluster. The proposed hammerhead cluster includes eight residential units around a hammerhead roadway. The 8-pack cluster includes eight residences in two rows around a shared roadway. The proposed townhomes would be attached in rows. Additionally, the proposed project would offer three complimentary elevations Spanish, American Traditional, and Craftsman.
Architecture
The three proposed architectural styles include varying architectural elements and features a smooth stucco exterior, tile roofing, and gridded windows with shutters with iron accents. The American Traditional style features a stucco and horizontal lap siding exterior with a decorative brick veneer, and gridded windows with shutter and decorative trim and sill. The Craftsman style features a stucco exterior with a decorative stone veneer, decorative corbels, and gridded windows decorative trim and sill.
Recreational Amenities
Single-Family and Missing Middle Residential Objective Design Standards encourage buildings to be oriented to create courtyards and open space areas and that community facilities and open spaces be conveniently located for the majority of residents. Pedestrian walking trails are proposed surrounding the residential areas with scenic viewpoint locations. A proposed recreation center is located near the center of the project site, which includes amenities such as a large sundeck with shade structures, provide unobstructed views overlooking Sand Creek to the north and have access points to the walking trails. Further to the east, a pocket park is also proposed with a gathering area and open space for small group activities. In addition, the three wetland areas located throughout the site are proposed to be avoided. Landscaping would need to be Antioch City Council Report
April 9, 2024 Agenda Item #6 8
-Family and Missing Middle Residential Objective Design Standards.
Circulation, Parking, and Utilities
The Ranch development to the north is proposed to span Sand Creek and provide the main point of access from Sand Creek Road. An additional roadway connection is proposed from Phase 3 of The Ranch, creating a looped roadway system for emergency vehicle access. The neighborhood street section proposes two travel lanes and parking, with a landscape strip and detached sidewalk. The proposed interior alley roads include two travel lanes with planting on either side.
The Antioch Engineering Department provided comments on street sections, traffic, parking, grading, and utilities. Comments include modifying street widths to accommodate bike lanes, parking, and public services such as trash and emergency vehicles. The City requires a 60-foot minimum right-of-way width consisting of 12-foot paved travel lanes, eight-foot shoulders, five-foot sidewalks, and a five-foot parkway on both sides.
Engineering would not support the currently proposed 20-foot-wide alleyways, which would need to be widened to 22 feet to ensure emergency vehicle access.
Due to the density of the project, Engineering would require a traffic study and a very detailed on- and off-street parking plan to mitigate potential issues such as blocked line of sight triangles. The plans also show dead end cul-de-sacs exceeding the 200-foot length limit. A site-specific geotechnical report and a soils report to document the feasibility of the development on the project site would be required. Utility plans would need to show complete right-of-way of Sand Creek Road dedicated to the city so sewer, water and drainage improvements can be constructed in the proposed Sand Creek Road extension in front of the Kaiser Permanente Hospital main entrance.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
On February 21, 2024, the Antioch Planning Commission held a public hearing and provided comments and feedback to the applicant regarding the Preliminary Development Plan.
The Planning Commission was in support of the did not
support the currently proposed density, street designs, and community amenities. The commissioners questioned the need to continue to increase the density from what was originally intended for the Sand Creek Focus Area. The Commissioners requested additional active open spaces, native landscaping, and street widths and cul-de-sacs redesigned per engineering comments. The Planning Commission also provided suggestions to include public transportation access for residents.
Antioch City Council Report
April 9, 2024 Agenda Item #6 9
Public Comments
Members of the public also spoke on the project, expressing concerns for the density, wildfire risks, heat islands, and the need to integrate local and native plant species into the development.
CONCLUSION
Staff recommends that the City Council provide the applicant feedback concerning the proposed project. Specifically, staff recommends feedback on the following items:
Proposed General Plan land use amendment to allow additional Low Density Residential, Medium Low Density Residential, and Medium Density Residential development in the Sand Creek Focus Area.
Proposed cluster and townhome development.
Proposed amount of active open space.
Proposed street widths and sidewalks.
ATTACHMENTS
A. Project Plans
B.
C. Agency Comments
D. February 21, 2024 Planning Commission Minutes
ATTACHMENT A
A1
A2
A4
A5
A6
A7
A8
A9
A10
A11
A12
November 30, 2022
LEUNG PROPERTY– FUA-1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Richland Communities presents a 435-unit residential development located on the Leung property within the Sand Creek Focus Area FUA-1. The 160± acre property is located on the southern side of Sand Creek, and to the east of Deer Valley Road, within the existing Antioch City limits. The site is bordered by Sand Creek and The Ranch residential project to the north, hillside open space to the south, and vacant open space parcels to the east and west. The project site is currently open space land with a General Plan Use of Estate & Executive Residential/Open Space and West Sand Creek District zoning. The proposed project would request a rezone to a Planned Development, with a General Plan Land Use of low, medium low, and medium density residential to provide an array of housing options. The hillside open space along the southern edge is proposed to be preserved to maintain the surrounding areas natural geography and design. Similarly, a buffer is proposed from Sand Creek to provide a natural transition from the developed area to an organic feature of the development. A bridge overcrossing connecting The Ranch development is proposed to span Sand Creek and provide the main point of access from Sand Creek Road. An additional roadway connection is proposed from Phase 3 of The Ranch, creating a looped roadway system for emergency vehicle access.
The neighborhood street section proposes two travel lanes and parking, with a landscape strip and detached sidewalk. The interior alley roads propose two travel lanes with planting on either side.
The project proposes a variety of housing options, including conventional single family detached units, clustered single family detached, as well as row townhomes. The overall density for the development is 2.72 dwelling units per acre. A main spine road bisects the project site, with higher density on the north side adjacent to Sand Creek, and lower density along the hillside open space. The conventional single-family product is located along the eastern edge, to provide a more seamless transition to the adjacent existing open space and residential homes. The 159- unit multifamily neighborhood consists of a street network with guest parking, with access to the main spine road through the development. The townhomes are proposed to be 2-story and provide a diverse mix of architectural styles that are complementary of the surrounding developments. A recreation center is positioned in the middle of the neighborhood to provide a break in the density and create a communal gathering location. The cluster single family detached homes are located on the southside of Street ‘C’ and consist of alleys branching off a neighborhood street. The neighborhood streets are proposed to terminate in a cul-de-sac for emergency vehicle turnaround and provide views to the hillside open space to the south. A mix of 95 hammerhead cluster single family homes and 131 8-pack cluster single family homes provides a balanced blend of layouts. The cluster single family homes include an 18’ deep driveway to allow for additional off-street parking. Street views of the cluster development are provided to demonstrate the variation in elevation and color schemes. Moving to the east, a neighborhood of 50 single family lots is proposed, with an average width of 50’ and depth of 90’. A perimeter loop road is proposed around the conventional single-family neighborhood to provide enhanced connectivity.
ATTACHMENT B
B1
In addition to an assortment of housing choices, the project proposes a mix of dispersed amenity areas throughout the site. Along the northwestern project entrance, a community neighborhood park is proposed with open active turf area and a meandering trail system. This park area provides a communal open space at one end of the project for the residents use, while also being set back from the adjacent homes to provide privacy. A meandering walkway with planting around the project perimeter is proposed to take advantage of the varying topography of the hillsides and Sand Creek. The walkway routes around the edge of the residential areas, along the stormwater basin, and adjacent to Sand Creek. Additional vista lookout locations are proposed on the hillside section and Sand Creek section of the walkway to provide respite places.
Sidewalks are proposed along the main spine road and within the residential neighborhoods. The multifamily neighborhood also includes additional common area walkways to enhance connectivity across the site. A recreation center is planned in the center of the development, between the main spine road and open space bordering Sand Creek. The recreation center includes additional amenities such as a large sundeck with shade structures and a children’s play area. The central clubhouse also proposes multiple uses with a lounge, workout room, and an office. The central clubhouse has unobstructed views out to Sand Creek to the north and has additional access points from the perimeter meandering walkway. Further to the east, a pocket park is also proposed with a gathering area and open space for small group activities. There are three isolated wetland areas located throughout the site that are proposed to be avoided with the development.
New wet and dry utility extensions are proposed with this development. A sanitary sewer and potable water stub are proposed at the termination of Street ‘B’ from The Ranch development to the north. The sewer and potable water stubs are proposed to extend with the bridge crossing over Sand Creek and into the project site. The sanitary sewer system within the Leung development is proposed to be a gravity system connecting to the provided stub and flow towards Deer Valley Road. An additional potable water stub is proposed from Street ‘C’ from The Ranch development to create a looped system within the development. The stormwater is proposed to be captured in a storm drainage system and conveyed towards the eastern edge of the project. The storm system is proposed to be discharged to a stormwater basin located in the northeastern corner for detention and treatment. The treated stormwater will then be discharged through an approved outfall structure into Sand Creek to the north. Dry utilities such as electric, gas, telecom and cable are proposed to be extended into the development for service.
B2
Memorandum
Date: November 20,2023
Re
General Plan Amendment.
List of Engineering Issues
Title sheet C1 and Site plan C-2
1. available On Street Parking: The needs to a
each , -street
in each Every
-street near their residence. Due
, every
unit have a -street near their home
be reached with this
visitors, maintenance workers or city
street and driveway.
2. Too long of dead-end Cul-de-sac streets. City standard d ST- 10a and ST-10B the maximum -ade-sac -de-sac streets shown in the
s
dead-end -de-sacs.
3. Minimum public street ROW width is 60 feet with 40’ wide pavement (curb to curb) .
4. Maintain good line of sight triangles.
, the many
ate streets marked - ,
.
5. Bike Lanes need to be street parking on both sides of public collector streets: s
any
development on .
ATTACHMENT C
C1
7. Provide a 1 ‘concrete rail, 5
8. minimum
3 wide ditches thus
wide.
9. ? , it
as a
area soccer
soccer use.
10. center line with larger turning curve radius on the east Sand Creek B , the roadway to Sand Creek
Road .
11. In the T - , needs to one
end so 3- turn around
.
12. The needs to the minimum land area to be created for City parks. There is a vacant area north o sand creek as by the
13. Secondary access through the Ranch needs to be created th access
so Ranch
14. 15. The roadway 90-
This new standard needs
-
17. is whether there is
room in bins
with these trash bins in
. The on trash days at
each driveway
18. 19. . This
subdivision.
C2
C-3
1. a. Need to the
b.
2. with the subdivision.
3. 4. 404
5. Need to see FEMA 100-year . The exhibit
to show 100-year event stream.
to .
an underground SD system . The developer needs to
provide a underground drainage system of inlets installed to drain the back yards. The side yards to narrow to drain the .
7. Need to review in greater detail all areas that have
239 and 250 which
there on
8. now
that are
. The City
C-4
1. A in The Ranch need to be shown. The
so th .
2. Need this subdivision to
3. 4. Need
can be constructed in the
main entrance.
C3
5. The Sand creek roadway
receive
.
Areas dry
es
7. within due
to its
.
8. boxes, and other internet
.
meet city standards.
9. Street rovide
and
and the
.
Overall Map S-1
1. the Ranch (Cowan)
and the main extens
2. th
unit.
3. steet and
4. Conceptual site plan S-2
See comments 1-
-7
a.
b. Need a y area.
c. Need a - court.
d. soccer
etc. within the areas.
e. Add any other residents.
a. There is no to at this re . eeded
residents and .
C4
b.
residents is service.
c.
d. sit to watch their kids swim and
.
e.
a. dead end .
b. the area.
c. ways .
sheet S-8
+
12-
very narrow: , thus
is
-9
1. need
2. Review the setbacks
- The Ranch
basins.
C5
Plan Review Team
Land Management
[email protected]
PG&E Gas and Electric Facilities Page 1
PG&E Gas and Electric Facilities Page 1
Public
November 22, 2023
Kevin Scudero
City of Antioch
200 H Street
Antioch, CA 94509
Re: PDP23-02: Leung Properties
Dear Kevin:
Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review the proposed Leung Properties development.
The installation of new gas and electric facilities and/or relocation of existing PG&E facilities will be performed in accordance with common law or Rules and Tariffs as authorized by the California Public Utilities Commission.
Following our review, PG&E recommends the following language be expressly stated for the offer to dedicate Public Utility Easements (PUE):
I/We the undersigned, as Owner(s) of the land shown hereon, do hereby state that I/we am/are the only person(s) whose consent is necessary to pass clear title to said land and do hereby consent to the preparation and recordation of this map and offer for dedication and do hereby dedicate for public uses the Public Utility Easements (PUEs) shown on this map for public utility purposes including electric, gas, communication facilities and all other public utility purposes; together with any and all appurtenances thereto, including the right from time to time to trim and to cut down and clear away or otherwise control any trees or brush. The PUEs hereby offered for dedication are to be kept open and free of buildings, structures and wells of any kind.
The final map must contain a statement setting forth dedications and offers to dedicate interests in real property for public utility purposes. If the offer of dedication has terminated, or the local agency declines to accept it, the applicant maybe required to provide an easement in gross satisfactory to PG&E. Please note that this is our preliminary review and PG&E reserves the right for future review as needed.
www.pge.com/cco for additional
services you may require, or for any modification and/or relocation requests.
Sincerely,
C6
PG&E Gas and Electric Facilities Page 2
PG&E Gas and Electric Facilities Page 2
Public
Justin Newell
Land Management
916-594-4068
C7
November 30, 2023
Kevin Scudero, Community Development Director
City of Antioch
Planning Division
200 H Street
Antioch, CA 94509
Sent via email to: [email protected]
RE: Leung Property – Preliminary Development Plan application for a General Plan amendment Dear Mr. Scudero,
The East Bay Regional Park District (Park District) appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Preliminary Development Plan application for a General Plan amendment for the 160-acre Leung Property (Proposed Project) in the Sand Creek Focus Area in Antioch. The Park District has maintained a long-term interest in development proposals and activities within the Sand Creek Focus Area, because it is in the vicinity of several Park District properties including Black Diamond Mines Regional Preserve to the west, Contra Loma Regional Park to the northwest, and Deer Valley Regional Park to the south. These properties protect open space in and around Antioch and provide much needed access to nature and outdoor recreation for residents throughout East Contra Costa County.
The Proposed Project includes a 435-unit residential development of townhomes and both clustered and conventional single-family dwellings, roadways, a recreation center, a catchment basin, and natural open space.
Street connections into and out of the proposed project site appear to be via two bridges at the north end of the property crossing over Sand Creek into “The Ranch” property to the north with no connections to the adjoining properties to the west, south, or east.
In 2022, the Park District and East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservancy (Conservancy) adopted a Habitat Restoration and Public Access Plan (Roddy Ranch Plan) for the former Roddy Ranch golf course located within the future Deer Valley Regional Park, about 1 mile south of the Proposed Project site.
This 230-acre former golf course off Deer Valley Road is anticipated to be one of the first areas of the East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservation Plan / Natural Communities Conservation Plan (HCP/NCCP) preserve lands system to open to public access and will serve as one of the most accessible sites in the preserve system. The plan for the former Roddy Ranch golf course proposes 4 miles of trails, a staging area, picnic sites, an interpretive pavilion, and future trail connections to other areas of the future Deer Valley Regional Park and nearby Black Diamond Mines Regional Preserve in the vicinity of the Sand Creek Focus Area and the Proposed Project. Additionally, over 100 acres of grassland and wetland habitat will be restored within the former golf course to provide habitat for sensitive species.
C8
Mr. Scudero
The Park District has been actively working with the City to identify potential mitigation options to offset the recreational impacts from the approved “Ranch” development project to the north of the Proposed Project.
Similarly, the Park District will continue to be interested in mitigation options for the Leung Property as well as an understanding of long-term management responsibilities for on-site preserved lands.
The southern approximately 65-acre portion of the Leung Property is hatched on the site plan map, presumably indicating that no development is to take place there. The Park District would like confirmation from the City about any plans for the 65-acre southernmost portion of the Leung Property, such as whether it is meant to remain as permanent open space along with the “natural open space” indicated on the site plans immediately south of the housing within the Proposed Project.
The Park District looks forward to continuing to work with the City of Antioch to ensure the protection of open space and recreational access to parklands as residential development projects are considered within the Sand Creek Focus Area.
Thank you for the opportunity to submit comments on the Proposed Project at the Leung Property in the Sand Creek Focus Area of Antioch. Please keep the Park District apprised of any project developments and please do not hesitate to reach out to Edward Willis, Acting Senior Planner, at 510-544-2621 or [email protected].
Sincerely,
Edward Willis
Acting Senior Planner
cc: Brian Holt, Chief of Planning, Trails & GIS
C9
1 Kevin Valente
From: Scudero, Kevin <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2023 8:21 AM
To: Kevin Valente
Subject: FW: City of Antioch Project Routing for Leung Properties (PDP23-02) Attachments: Leung Property Project Routing.pdf
Kevin Scudero
Acting Community Development Director
Senior Planner
: 925-779-6159 (Main)
: 925-779-6133 (Direct)
: www.antiochca.gov
City of Antioch | P.O. Box 5007, Antioch, CA 94531-5007 From: Thao Nguyen <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2023 8:11 AM
To: Scudero, Kevin <[email protected]>
Cc: Michelle Cordis <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: City of Antioch Project Routing for Leung Properties (PDP23 02) CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Hello Kevin,
The Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (FC District) has reviewed the Request for Comments for the Leung Property project (APN 057 041 013, 015, 016) in the City of An tioch (City), CA 94531. We submit the following comments:
1. This project is located within Drainage Area 130, for which a drainage fee is due in accordance with Flood Control Ordinance Number 2007 6. By ordinance, all building permits or subdivision maps filed in this area are subject to the provisions of the drainage fee ordinance. Effective Jan 1, 2023, the current fee in this drainage area is $0.89 per square foot of newly created impervious surface.
C10
2 2. The DA130 drainage fee can be calculated once the developer's engineer submits a worksheet, which includes a scalable map that calculates the total impervious surface on the parcel pre and post development. The drainage area fee for this development should be collected prior to filing the final map.
3. The District is not the approving local agency for this project as defined by the Subdivision Map Act. As a special district, the District has an independent authority to collect drainage fees that is not restricted by the Subdivision Map Act. The District reviews the drainage fee rate every year the ordinance is in effect and adjusts the rate annually on January 1 to account for inflation. The drainage fee rate does not vest at the time of tentative map approval. The drainage fees due and payable will be based on the fee in effect at the time of fee collection.
4. The developer should contact the City to determine if this development is required to adhere to any creek structure setback requirements within the City Ordinance Code. If so, the applicant should be required to show the creek structure setback line on the tentative map and dedicate development rights to the City.
5. We recommend that the City condition the developer to design and construct storm drain facilities to adequately collect and convey stormwater entering or originating within the development to the nearest adequate man
made drainage facility or natural watercourse, without diversion of the watershed.
6. The developer should be r equired to submit hydrology and hydraulic calculations to the City that prove the adequacy of the in tract drainage system and the downstream drainage system. We defer review of the local drainage to the City.
7. We recommend that the City condition the developer to contact the appropriate environmental regulatory agencies such as the State Department of Fish and Wildlife, and State Regional Water Quality Control Board to obtain all the necessary permits for this project or show that such permits are not necessary.
8. The developer should be required to comply with the current National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Syst em (NPDES) requirements under the City Stormwater Management and Discharge Control Ordinances and the C.3 Guidebook. We support the State's goal of providing best management practices to achieve the permanent reduction or elimination of stormwater pollutants and downstream erosion from new development.
We appreciate the opportunity to review plans involving drainage matters. Please let us know if you have any questions.
Thao Nguyen Nguyen | Staff Engineer
Contra Costa County Flood Control & Water Conservation District 255 Glacier Drive, Martinez, CA 94553
[email protected] | Office: 925 313 2197
From: Villagrana, Monique < [email protected] > Sent: Thursday, November 2, 2023 10:26 AM
Subject: City of Antioch Project Routing for Leung Properties (PDP23 02) CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Good Morning,
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important C11
3 The City of Antioch Planning Division is requesting your review of the project information and plans contained in the attached document.
Please provide feedback on availability of services, potential design or code conflicts, requirements for additional permits and draft conditions of project approval.
Responses are requested at your earliest availability, by or before November 30, 2023, to Kevin Scudero at [email protected].
Thank You in advance for your time and collaboration.
Monique Villagrana
Community Development Technician | Planning Division
: (925) 779-6163 (Direct)
: (925) 779-6159 (Main)
: (925) 779-7034 (Fax)
: [email protected]
: www.antiochca.gov
Community Development Department | 200 H Street, Antioch, CA 94509-1005 This email has been scanned for spam and viruses by Proofpoint Essentials. Click here to report this email as spam.
C12
5-1
Agenda Item #
CITY OF ANTIOCH
PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
Regular Meeting February 21, 2024
6:30 P.M. City Council Chambers
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chairperson Gutilla called the meeting to order at 6:30 P.M. on Wednesday, February 21, 2024, in Council Chambers.
2. ROLL CALL
Present: Commissioners Jones, Lutz, Martin, Vice Chairperson Riley and Chairperson Gutilla
Absent: Commissioner Hills
Staff: Outside Legal Counsel, Ruthann Ziegler
Acting Director of Community Development, Kevin Scudero Acting Planning Manager, Zoe Merideth
Contract Planner, Kevin Valente
Contract Engineer, Kevin Van Katwyk
Minutes Clerk, Kitty Eiden
Acting Planning Manager Merideth introduced Nathan Tinclair, Associate Planner.
The Planning Commission welcomed Associate Planner Sinclair to the City.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Chairperson Gutilla led the Pledge of Allegiance.
4. PUBLIC COMMENT
Alexander Broom requested the Planning Commission agendize consideration of installing traffic calming measures on Hillcrest Avenue and Davidson Drive at Deer Valley Road.
5. CONSENT CALENDAR
Commissioner Martin requested Consent Calendar Item 5-2 be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate consideration.
5-1. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes December 6, 2023
5-3. Creekside Vineyards Extension | GP-9-06, PD-19-02 | APN 057-050-024 Two- year extension request of the Creekside Vineyards at Sand Creek Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map 9501 and Design Review Approvals.
ATTACHMENT D
D1
Planning Commission
Regular Meeting
February 21, 2024 Page 2 of 13
On motion by Commissioner Riley, seconded by Commissioner Lutz the Planning Commission members present unanimously approved Consent Calendar Items 5-1 and 5-3. The motion carried the following vote:
AYES: Jones, Lutz, Martin, Riley, Gutilla
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Hills
5-2. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes January 17, 2024
Commissioner Martin stated he had requested this item be considered separately because he was absent and would be abstaining from the vote.
Chairperson Gutilla stated she was also absent from the meeting and would be abstaining.
In response to Commissioner Riley, Outside Legal Counsel Ziegler clarified that five Commissioners were present this evening so if the Planning Commission approved the minutes by three votes, it would be a majority of the quorum which would be sufficient for this matter.
On motion by Commissioner Riley, seconded by Commissioner Lutz the Planning Commission approved Consent Calendar Item 5-2. The motion carried the following vote:
AYES: Jones, Lutz, Riley
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: Martin, Gutilla
ABSENT: Hills
6. NEW PUBLIC HEARING
6-1. Laurel Ranch Car Wash | PDP22-01 | APN 053-060-064 The applicant requests Preliminary Development Plan (PDP) review of a new 2,800 square foot carwash with 18 vacuum stations and a 2,500 square foot convenience store. The proposed project includes 35 parking spaces, inclusive of the 18 vacuum stalls. Associated improvements including landscaping and stormwater control facilities are also proposed. The project is located at the southwest corner of Laurel Road and Country Hills Drive.
Acting Planning Manager Merideth presented the staff report dated February 21, 2024, recommending the Planning Commission provide the applicant with feedback regarding the proposal.
Julio Tinajero, Milestone Associates presented a history of the project and the revised site plan based on feedback received from the Planning Commission on their previous submittal.
Chairperson Gutilla opened the public comment period.
D2
Planning Commission
Regular Meeting
February 21, 2024 Page 3 of 13
Laura Kindsvater advocated for the Planning Commission to mandate that the applicant increase the proportion of native plant species in their project to over 70%.
An unidentified speaker expressed concern about the project's egress during peak traffic hours.
Additionally, this speaker expressed support for alternative commercial uses for the site.
Alexander Broom shared the sentiment expressed by the previous speaker regarding alternative commercial uses for the site.
Chairperson Gutilla closed the public comment period.
In response to Commissioner Martin, Acting Planning Manager Merideth provided clarification regarding the General Plan and East Lone Tree Specific Plan map designation for the site and specified that the stand-alone parking was situated behind the convenience store.
In response to Commissioner Martin, Contract Engineer Kevin Van Katwyk reviewed option layout 1 and 2 (staff report attachment D2 and D3).
Commissioner Martin voiced opposition to the project but expressed conditional support for specific aspects if the project were to be approved. These included:
Elimination of the 360-degree turn to enter the carwash.
Elimination of parking behind the building.
Support for the current building design.
Inclusion of a noise, light and traffic survey.
Increasing the proportion of native plant species.
Reduction in hours of operation to 5:00 A.M. – 10:00 P.M.
Commissioner Lutz echoed the sentiments expressed by Commissioner Martin and offered additional feedback for the project, which included:
Elimination of the carwash.
Revising the project into a convenience store with adequate parking.
Concern regarding traffic in the area and the circulation plan.
Commissioner Jones requested the results of the site feasibility study and outreach to the neighboring community be provided if the project returned to the Commission.
Commissioner Riley stated he opposed the previous project submittal but acknowledged that while it may not be the most desirable use of the site, it could still provide convenience for residents in the area. He highlighted the unique characteristics of the parcel, noting its odd shape, and expressed a desire to see development take place on the site.
Chairperson Gutilla outlined several concerns and areas of support regarding the project:
Concerns:
D3
Planning Commission
Regular Meeting
February 21, 2024 Page 4 of 13
Smell of recycled water.
Trash generated from customers.
Noise impacts.
Traffic impacts and circulation plan.
Parking behind the building.
Location of the trash receptacle.
Support:
Reduction in hours of operation.
Increasing native species in landscaping.
Installing canopies over vacuum stations.
Revising the project as electric vehicle (EV) charging stations and an indoor play structure for customers.
Chairperson Gutilla expressed her general opposition to the project while acknowledging the removal of the gas station. She thanked the applicant for this change and noted the unique nature of the parcel.
Commissioner Riley offered conditional support for aspects of the project, should it proceed:
Removal of vacuum stations closest to residential lots.
Relocating the trash receptacle behind the structure and potentially replacing it with parking spaces.
Support for a variance for canopies over vacuum facilities contingent upon ensuring they would not obstruct line of sight for traffic.
Chairperson Gutilla closed the Commissioner comment period and thanked the applicant for bringing the project forward.
In response to Mr. Tinajero’s requests for an opportunity to respond to comments, Chairperson Gutilla reopened the Commissioner comment period.
Mr. Tinajero expressed gratitude for the feedback provided. He reported that the applicant would be the owner/operator of the project and was locally based. He explained that the applicant purchased the property under the belief that it was zoned for commercial use; however, it was later discovered to be zoned residential. He noted this discrepancy created challenges for the project's development, especially considering the parcel's size and shape, which may not be suitable for residential development. He requested the Planning Commission consider the circumstances under which the property was purchased, and the challenges posed by the zoning discrepancy. He emphasized that commercial zoning across the street supported the feasibility of commercial development on the property. He highlighted the necessity for revenue-generating options to make the project economically viable. He provided an overview of the site circulation plan.
Chairperson Gutilla agreed that the site was inconsistent with residential development.
D4
Planning Commission
Regular Meeting
February 21, 2024 Page 5 of 13
Acting Director of Community Development Scudero explained that the parcel was initially designated to serve as the stormwater retention area for the development across the street. He confirmed that preliminary meetings were held with the applicant under the assumption that the parcel was zoned for commercial use. He clarified that during these discussions, staff expressed reservations about the proposed gas station/carwash development, but the applicant chose to proceed. He suggested that the Planning Commission provide feedback on what type of development should occur on the site.
Commissioner Lutz stated he would prefer a large convenience store and hydrogen charging station occur on this site.
Commissioner Jones stated she would prefer an EV charging station with a convenience store.
Commissioner Riley stated he preferred a large convenience store or coffee shop.
Commissioner Martin stated he preferred a single use commercial development such as a large convenience store, deli or coffee shop.
Chairperson Gutilla stated she agreed with the previously suggested alternative uses for the parcel. Specifically, she supported the idea of developing a large convenience store with a deli or bagel shop, emphasizing the importance of ample parking, and limiting operating hours.
Chairperson Gutilla closed the Commission comment period.
6-2 Leung Properties | PDP23-02 | APN 057-041-013, 015, 016: The applicant requests a Preliminary Development Plan review of a proposal to construct a 435- unit residential development over a 160-acre vacant project site (APNs 057-041- 013, 057-041-015, 057-041-016). The proposed project includes the development of 50 conventional single family detached units, 385 clustered single family detached residential units, and 159 row townhomes. The project also includes a recreation center, two neighborhood parks, and walking trails. Primary site access would be from Sand Creek Road.
Acting Director of Community Development Scudero introduced Contract Planner Valente who presented the staff report dated February 21, 2024, recommending the Planning Commission provide direction to the applicant for the Final Development Plan Submittal.
Kyle Masters, Richland Communities / The Ranch Phase 4, gave a brief overview of the project map.
Terry Gallaway / The Gallaway Group / The Ranch Phase 4, gave a PowerPoint presentation of their master plan, conceptual site plan, open space, technical site plan, architecture, and conceptual street scene.
Chairperson Gutilla opened the public comment period.
D5
Planning Commission
Regular Meeting
February 21, 2024 Page 6 of 13
Juan Pablo Galvan Martinez, Senior Land Use Manager at Save Mount Diablo, reported they had engaged with the developer of The Ranch project, leading to a mutually satisfactory resolution regarding the buffer along Sand Creek and the dedication of open space. He expressed satisfaction that a similar proposal was being put forth for the project under consideration. He requested the City and Planning Commission consider tracking the cap on housing units for the Sand Creek Focus Area.
Laura Kindsvater advocated for the Planning Commission to mandate that the applicant enhance the proportion of keystone and native plant species to exceed 70% for the housing units and parks. She proposed restoration efforts in the natural areas along Sand Creek and expressed support for buildings facing the creek.
Alexander Broom spoke in support of the perimeter walkway and advocated for the inclusion of a greater variety of drought tolerant native plant species throughout the development. He stressed the importance of wildfire mitigation measures and expressed apprehension regarding evacuation routes from the area. He suggested the implementation of cool roofs. He inquired about the width of the trail and proposed the addition of other amenities to enhance the area.
An unidentified speaker raised concerns about the project's trajectory, noting that the applicant intended to secure entitlements before selling it to a builder. He also expressed concern regarding the elimination of estate housing and questioned the potential implications for the City's RHNA numbers. He highlighted the proposed density increase without consideration for affordable housing. He suggested the construction of a gated community with an Homeowners Association (HOA) and increased lot sizes.
Chairperson Gutilla closed the public comment period.
In response to Commissioner Jones, Mr. Gallaway reviewed the square footage allocated for each product type.
In response to the Commission, Acting Director of Community Development Scudero clarified that the term "single-family missing middle objective design standards" pertained to housing types rather than income levels. He also indicated that staff was not aware of any instances of flooding in the area under consideration.
Mr. Masters clarified that the project included detention measures for all runoff. He mentioned plans to construct a detention basin adjacent to existing basins, which would eventually integrate into the park and open space area surrounding the trail system. He highlighted the connectivity of the project to The Ranch and East Bay Regional Park’s trail systems.
In response to Commissioner Lutz, Mr. Masters clarified that bridges for the project would be elevated above the 300-year flood protection level, emerging from abutments. He mentioned the possibility of exploring emergency vehicle access to the area as well. He affirmed their commitment to adhering to the City's regulations concerning landscaping and the incorporation of native species. Additionally, he expressed openness to consider the inclusion of an affordable housing component.
D6
Planning Commission
Regular Meeting
February 21, 2024 Page 7 of 13
Commissioner Lutz expressed his support for incorporating an affordable housing component into the project.
Mr. Masters discussed the importance of offering a diverse range of housing options that catered to individuals from various backgrounds.
In response to Commissioner Lutz, Acting Director of Community Development Scudero clarified that a planned development zone permitted flexibility regarding setbacks.
In response to Commissioner Lutz, Mr. Gallaway elaborated on setbacks and circulation plans for the cluster home products. He commented on the water-saving benefits of native plants and mentioned plans to grade the perimeter edge of the open space to facilitate a smooth transition into the project. He requested feedback from the Planning Commission on all aspects of the project. He explained that they typically sold to homebuilders who understood buyer preferences. He clarified that they hadn't proposed apartment-type developments as they didn't perceive a suitable market for it in this location. He emphasized their approach to addressing housing affordability by increasing density to enhance the residual value of the land. Additionally, he mentioned their endeavor to provide housing options suitable for families with children.
Commissioner Lutz expressed concern that increasing density might not necessarily lead to a decrease in housing prices.
Mr. Gallaway mentioned that they were opting for two-story construction as a cost-effective building design approach.
Acting Director of Community Development Scudero reported that the housing element included consideration of an inclusionary housing ordinance, and staff had initiated that process. He further mentioned that these projects could potentially be subject to that ordinance.
Commissioner Riley voiced support for both the project’s density and design. Additionally, he remarked that he wished the project were closer to a highway or transit station. He stated that the area was relatively secluded, emphasizing the importance of having nearby infrastructure for the benefit of residents.
In response to Commissioner Riley, Mr. Gallaway commented that they had secured additional parking on the streets by avoiding driveways that would interrupt parking spaces.
Mr. Masters added that there would be an HOA in place to manage parking along with other aspects of the project.
Commissioner Riley discussed the importance of providing mass transit access to the area.
Commissioner Martin questioned how this project would affect the cap on residential units for this area.
D7
Planning Commission
Regular Meeting
February 21, 2024 Page 8 of 13
Acting Director of Community Development Scudero explained that when the General Plan was adopted in 2003, the Sand Creek Focus Area had a cap of 4000 units. He noted that every project developed since then had requested an increase in density, yet the cap had not been adjusted to accommodate those increases. He further stated his belief that the cap might not be compliant with state law. Therefore, when an entitlement application comes forward, they would need to consult legal counsel to determine if the cap was enforceable or if it needed to be amended.
Commissioner Martin commented he disliked the density; however, he understood that it made the project more affordable. He provided the following feedback:
Concerns regarding General Plan amendments eliminating estate housing and the challenges this would pose in meeting the requirements of the housing element.
Support for the staff's response to the identified engineering issues Support for adhering to the City's guidelines for setbacks to allow for the storage of refuge containers behind fences.
Support for the proposed architecture.
Increasing recreational amenities.
Increasing native plant species.
Enhanced fire resistance measures due to the presence of open space.
Inclusion of a traffic study.
Chairperson Gutilla stated she supported the following:
Incorporating a downstairs bedroom for two-story models.
Support for cul-de-sacs, provided parking was available in the center.
Advocacy for a variety of transition areas between the cul-de-sac communities and open space.
Increasing bike-friendly options, pedestrian access, and vehicle parking at the community center.
Ensuring a smooth transition for landscaping between the open space, trails, and development.
Advocating for additional emergency vehicle access on Deer Valley Road.
Supporting public access for transit opportunities.
Mr. Gallaway explained how each product type would be serviced by the garbage company.
Acting Director of Community Development Scudero stated the first question before the Planning Commission was if they supported the General Plan changes.
Chairperson Gutilla also suggested:
Less density on the perimeter of the project to facilitate a smoother transition to open space.
Support for the staff's response to the identified engineering issues.
D8
Planning Commission
Regular Meeting
February 21, 2024 Page 9 of 13
In response to Commissioner Jones, Acting Director of Community Development Scudero explained that every development in the Sand Creek Focus Area had either increased density or reduced lot sizes from the current General Plan designations. He reiterated that they were in the initial stages of developing an inclusionary housing ordinance and when they selected the consultant, they would discuss timing and its impact on development applications deemed complete. He provided an overview of the City’s current deed restricted affordable housing units.
Chairperson Gutilla closed the Commission comment period.
Chairperson Gutilla declared a recess at 9:29 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 9:38 P.M. with all Commissioners present, except for Commissioner Hills, who was previously reported as absent.
Acting Planning Manager Merideth announced that past practice was that the Commission end the public hearings at 9:30 P.M. She requested that they consider whether they wanted to proceed this evening with the remainder of the agenda. With consensus of the Commission, the Planning Commission agreed to continue with the final public hearing this evening.
6-3 Rancho Meadows PDP | PRE2023-0002 | APN 051-052-053, 051-082-010 The applicant requests a Preliminary Development Plan review of a proposal to construct 143 residential units on a 17.12-acre vacant project site (APNs 051-052-053-9, 051-082-010- 3). The proposed project includes the development of 137 residential lots at approximately 2,600 square-feet (sf) and six residential lots at 4,200 sf. The project also includes one open space area near the project entry consisting of a children’s play area, seating, picnic tables, a shade trellis, and play field. Site access would be provided by an off-site extension of Vineyard Drive across the existing PG&E easement.
Acting Director of Community Development Scudero introduced Contract Planner Valente who presented the staff report dated February 21, 2024, recommending the Planning Commission provide direction to the applicant for the Final Development Plan Submittal.
Kerri Watt, Civic Rancho Meadows Applicant / DeNova Homes, gave a PowerPoint presentation of the Ranch Meadows Project Preliminary Development Plan.
Trent Sanson, Civic Rancho Meadows / Yellow Roof Foundation / Executive VP of DeNova Homes, provided a brief overview of their 501c3 charitable foundation and outlined their proposal to include six renter-occupied low-income units with junior Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs). He explained their request for a general plan amendment and rezone proposal. Additionally, he noted that the current light industrial office use did not appear compatible with adjacent residential zoning.
Kerry Watt commented that they would prioritize the use of as many pollinators and native species as possible. Additionally, she mentioned that the houses would adhere to the City's Objective Design Standards.
Chairperson Gutilla opened the public comment period.
D9
Planning Commission
Regular Meeting
February 21, 2024 Page 10 of 13
Alexander Broom suggested expanding park space and native plant species in the project. He expressed concern for the potential inconsistency of the proposal with the City's Climate Action Resiliency Plan and suggested the proposal align with the current General Plan designation.
Laura Kindsvater requested the Planning Commission require the applicant to increase native plant species to more than 70% with an emphasis on locally native and keystone species. She provided resources to assist the developer in meeting this requirement.
An unidentified speaker voiced his support for the project, highlighting the developer's commitment to offering affordable housing. He mentioned the project’s potential positive impacts. He suggested the developer view Santa Fe Avenue as a traditional right-of-way and prioritize transit and pedestrian connectivity in their planning efforts.
Chairperson Gutilla closed the public comment period.
Commissioner Jones spoke in support of converting office space for housing specifically if it comes with an affordability component. She noted that there was currently less demand for office space, making such a conversion a beneficial use of the property.
Commissioner Lutz voiced his support for the Yellow Roof Foundation, suggesting that it should serve as a model for other developers.
In response to Commissioner Lutz, Contract Planner Valente clarified that if the project were to proceed, it would undergo an environmental review process. He assured that any contamination present at the site would be addressed and remediated as part of the project development process.
Mr. Sanson explained that prior to acquiring the property, an environmental site assessment was conducted which revealed that the site had historically been used as a vineyard. He emphasized their commitment to collaborating with staff on a comprehensive review process through CEQA and their willingness to ensure compliance with environmental regulations.
Commissioner Lutz questioned the potential impact of reallocating land that was originally designated for job creation.
Acting Director of Community Development Scudero acknowledged that repurposing the land would result in the loss of sites designated for business park/light industrial; however, he emphasized that when viewed within the broader context of the eastern waterfront employment focus area, the property in question could be seen as transitional. He noted that the primary consideration for the Commission was whether they supported the proposed change in land use.
He further noted that while the property could potentially be used for a lower intensity business park, it was uncertain if there was a market demand for such a development in that location. He noted that there were entitled business park uses that had not yet been developed in this area.
D10
Planning Commission
Regular Meeting
February 21, 2024 Page 11 of 13
In response to Commissioner Lutz, Mr. Sanson explained that the Yellow Roof Foundation homes were clustered together for ease of maintenance and to facilitate a supportive community environment.
Commissioner Lutz requested that side yard setbacks and park space be increased while also advocating for a decrease in density. Additionally, he expressed concern about the lack of amenities in the area.
Commissioner Riley expressed concern about the insufficient park space, amenities, and third spaces in the area. He proposed extending the park space by eliminating homes on lots 35 and
36. He voiced support for rezoning the property, emphasizing its adjacency to an existing residential neighborhood and the decreasing need for business parks. He spoke favorably of the Yellow Roof Foundation and the project, suggesting that they could serve as a positive example for other developers.
Commissioner Martin expressed concern regarding the removal of grapevines on the property; however, he acknowledged the necessity for housing development, especially considering the areas limited suitability for industrial use due to factors such as accessibility challenges and the presence of high-tension power lines. He also highlighted the property's unique shape and its adjacency to other residential areas. He encouraged the developer to disclose the presence of high-tension power lines, emphasizing the importance of transparency regarding potential interference they could cause. He voiced support for the affordable housing component proposed by the Yellow Roof Foundation. He requested the widening of alley E and L to accommodate sidewalks on both sides of the street.
Mr. Sanson clarified that the alleys were designed to serve as vehicular pass-through access to garages. He expressed willingness to explore potential modifications to the plan.
Commissioner Martin requested sideyard setbacks be increased to a minimum of 5 yards and spoke in support of the suggestion to increase park space by removing lots 35 and 36. He expressed a preference for a 20-foot front yard setback; however, he indicated a willingness to support increasing open space if this item remained unchanged.
In response to Commissioner Martin, Mr. Sanson stated they would be fronting costs associated with extending Vineyard Drive. He stated their intention was for everything north of the PG&E parcel to be privately owned and maintained through a future HOA; however, they were in discussions with PG&E to acquire an easement right-of-way or fee simple for the portion of the road extending through their parcel. He noted they would engage with city staff to determine the logistics and maintenance boundaries between public right-of-way and private ownership.
Commissioner Martin recommended the installation of a sound wall or other sound protection measures along the north side of the development, particularly along the railroad tracks.
Mr. Sanson stated that they would be conducting an acoustic study which would provide recommendations for the installation of a sound wall and sound attenuation measures.
D11
Planning Commission
Regular Meeting
February 21, 2024 Page 12 of 13
Commissioner Martin supported the engineering requirements outlined in the staff report and the Objective Design Standards. He encouraged the developer to consider incorporating native and keystone species into their landscape plan.
Mr. Sanson affirmed that the development team was willing to accommodate the requests regarding native and keystone species wherever possible.
Chairperson Gutilla expressed concern about the potential presence of toxins on the site from pesticides used in old growth vineyards. She cautioned developers against exploiting disadvantaged individuals by placing them in environmentally compromised areas. She noted that the combination of small lots, narrow streets, and a lack of sidewalks could contribute to miniaturizing the neighborhood; therefore, she agreed with the engineering recommendations for sidewalks on both sides of the street. She suggested that the architecture of the Yellow Roof homes match the architecture of the remainder of the development.
In response to Chairperson Gutilla, Mr. Sanson clarified that the intent of the ADU program was for each unit to be separate. He explained that they were in the process of developing the floor plan for the Yellow Roof program, but each unit would be built independently and have a one car garage with its own point of entry.
Chairperson Gutilla requested side yards for both Yellow Roof units be a minimum of 5-feet.
Additionally, she stated that while there may be concerns regarding the jobs/housing imbalance, she considered this specific parcel to be an appropriate site for residential development. She suggested that if all the homes in the adjacent neighborhood to the west were single-story, she would prefer the homes on that side of the development to also be single-story.
Mr. Sanson responded that they would investigate that issue and commented that many of the lots in question were located far away from the property line.
Chairperson Gutilla expressed her support for the use of native plant species and the Yellow Roof Foundation proposal. She suggested the developer consider whether the turnaround area was large enough to accommodate people who might accidentally enter the project.
Commissioner Riley expressed his preference for sidewalks on both sides of the streets; however, he felt that the alleyways could be an exception to this preference.
Chairperson Gutilla stated she supported the suggestion for increasing park space by expanding the park into lots 35 and 36.
In response to Commissioner Jones, Mr. Sanson clarified that both the single-family home and the ADU would serve as affordable housing units, resulting in a total of 12 affordable housing units within the development.
Chairperson Gutilla closed the Commission comment period. She thanked the applicant for presenting their project and wished them luck moving forward.
D12
Planning Commission
Regular Meeting
February 21, 2024 Page 13 of 13
7. REGULAR ITEM
7-1. TRANSPLAN Committee Discussion
Consensus of the Planning Commission agreed to table Regular Item #7-1.
On motion by Commissioner Riley, seconded by Commissioner Jones the Planning Commission members present unanimously tabled Regular Item 7-1. The motion carried the following vote:
AYES: Jones, Lutz, Martin, Riley, Gutilla
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Hills
8. ORAL/WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
Acting Director of Community Development Scudero reported that the City Council had added a discussion on the City’s native landscaping to their 90-day future agenda item list.
9. COMMITTEE REPORTS - None
10. NEXT MEETING: March 20, 2024 / March 6, 2024, meeting is canceled.
Chairperson Gutilla announced the March 6, 2024, Planning Commission meeting was canceled and the next meeting would be held on March 20, 2024.
11. ADJOURNMENT
On motion by Commissioner Martin, seconded by Commissioner Riley, the Planning Commission members present unanimously adjourned the meeting at 10:51 P.M. The motion carried the following vote:
AYES: Jones, Lutz, Martin, Riley, Gutilla
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Hills
Kitty Eiden
KITTY EIDEN, Minutes Clerk
D13
Agenda Item #
STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: Regular Meeting of April 9, 2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
SUBMITTED BY: Kevin Valente, Contract Planner
Raney Planning & Management, Inc.
APPROVED BY: Kevin Scudero, Acting Community Development Director SUBJECT: Rancho Meadows Project Preliminary Development Plan
RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended the City Council provide feedback to the applicant and staff regarding the proposal and provide direction to the applicant for the Final Development Plan submittal.
FISCAL IMPACT
The development of the Rancho Meadows Project will be fully funded by the applicant, DeNova Homes, Inc. The City will incur no costs in the development.
DISCUSSION
Request
The applicant, Kerri Watt, DeNova Homes, Inc, request Preliminary Development Plan review of a proposal to construct 143 residential units on a 17.12-acre vacant project site (APNs 051-052-053-9, 051-082-010-3). The proposed project includes the development of 137 residential lots at approximately 2,600 square-feet (sf) and six residential lots at 4,200 sf. The project also includes one open space area near the project entry consisting of a children’s play area, seating, picnic tables, a shade trellis, and play field. Site access would be provided by an off-site extension of Vineyard Drive across the existing PG&E easement. The applicant's project description is provided as Attachment A.
Environmental
Preliminary Development Plan review is a non-entitlement action and does not require environmental review. The future project application review would require compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Antioch City Council Report
April 9, 2024 Agenda Item #7 2
Background
The project site is 17.12 acres of existing vineyards within the Eastern Waterfront Focus Area north of E. 18th Street, south of the Santa Fe Railroad, and to the west of State Route 160. It should be noted that the project site is located northwest of the recently Location Map
Project Location
Antioch City Council Report
April 9, 2024 Agenda Item #7 3
Project Site Map
Antioch City Council Report
April 9, 2024 Agenda Item #7
approved E. 18th Street West Warehouse project. The project site has a General Plan land use designation of Eastern Waterfront Employment Area Focus Area - Business Park and is zoned Planned Business Center (PBC). The project site is subject to the provisions of the East Eighteenth Street Specific Plan. The primary function of the Eastern Waterfront Employment Area is to provide industrial employment opportunities, revitalize former heavy industrial lands along the river, including transitioning to other uses.
The PDP application was submitted to the City in May 2023 and staff determined the application was complete in December 2023 and was routed to City Departments and outside agencies for review. Planning and Engineering staff, the Contra Costa County Flood Control District, Chevron, and PG&E have provided comments on the proposed project (see Attachment D).
The purpose of a Preliminary Development Plan is to gather feedback from the Planning Commission, City Council, and others in order for the applicant to become aware of concerns and/or issues prior to Final Development Plan and Tentative Map Submittal. As standard practice, preliminary plans are not conditioned; rather a list of needed items, information, and issues to be addressed is compiled for the applicant to address prior to submitting an entitlement application.
ANALYSIS
Project Overview
The Rancho Meadows Project site consists of two properties totaling 17.12 acres. The project site currently includes a vineyard but is not currently harvested. A PG&E easement borders the property to the south, the Santa Fe Railroad is to the north, existing single- family residences are to the west, and existing vineyards to the east with State Route 160 further east.
The applicant is proposing a 143-unit residential development consisting of 137 single- family detached homes on approximately 2,600 sf lots and six renter-occupied homes on 4,200 sf lots designed for people who are at risk of being unhoused. The Yellow Roof Foundation is a non-profit organization that is proposed to own and manage the six low- based upon current income rather than a fixed rent based upon area median income. The proposed project would have an overall density of 8.35 dwelling units per acre (du/ac).
play area, seating, picnic tables, a shade trellis, and open grass areas.
Primary access to the site is proposed by constructing an off-site extension of Vineyard Drive through the 100-foot-wide PG&E overhead electric distribution lines easement, with a 25-foot-wide Emergency Vehicle Access (EVA) at the northwest side of the property.
Both the primary entry and the EVA are proposed to be gated.
Antioch City Council Report
April 9, 2024 Agenda Item #7 2
Consistency with the General Plan and Zoning
The Antioch General Plan designates the project site as Eastern Waterfront Employment Focus Area with a Business Park zoning as a part of the East 18th Street Specific Plan.
The project site is currently designated for employment generating uses such as office and light industrial so long as they are compatible with a location adjacent to residential neighborhoods.
Therefore, the proposed project would require a General Plan land use map amendment from Eastern Waterfront Employment Focus Area to Medium Density Residential (MDR).
Areas designated as MDR have a wide range of living accommodations, such as conventional single-family dwellings, multi-family townhouses, and apartment developments. Developments in these areas can be expected to be a maximum of two stories and include generous amounts of public or open space for active and passive recreational uses. Lands adjacent to parks, commercial uses, transit routes and rail stations, and arterial roadways would be appropriate for the upper end of the allowable development intensity for this category. Pursuant to the Antioch General Plan, the density range in the proposed MDR land use designation is 6-10 du/acre. The current proposed gross density for the entire project site would be 8.35 du/ac which is near the mid-point density.
The purpose and intent of the Business Park zoning is to provide for light industrial, research and development, and office-based firms seeking an attractive and pleasant working environment and a prestigious location. Business Park areas are typically labor- intensive, meaning the density of employment is higher than areas involving mostly manufacturing or warehouse uses. Business Park development may occur as single use, a multi-tenant complex, or subdivision wherein individual entities own and operate their businesses, but do not generally include structures for human occupancy.
Therefore, the proposed project would require a rezone from Business Park to Planned Development District (PD). PD districts are intended to accommodate a wide range of residential, commercial, and industrial land uses which are mutually supportive and compatible with existing and proposed developments on surrounding properties. Once rezoned, the PD district would establish its own specific development standards for the area within its respective boundaries, with its own specific development standards, including lot size, yard setbacks, and building height requirements.
Staff recommends that the City Council consider whether a General Plan land use amendment to allow residential development is appropriate at the site. Should the City Council feel that an amendment to allow residential development is appropriate then the Council should also consider whether the proposed residential product type is the most appropriate for the site or if they would prefer to see a different type of residential product (i.e. a denser multi-family development).
Antioch City Council Report
April 9, 2024 Agenda Item #7 3
Zoning Standards
The proposed plans show each plan-type on the three smallest typical lot sizes, and the rental home plotted on its typical lot size. The plans show front yard setbacks of 18 feet to 20 feet to the garage, a minimum of 10 feet for living areas, four-foot-wide side yard setbacks, and minimum rear setbacks of five to eight feet. For 137 of the proposed single family lots the average lot size is approximately 2,600 square feet.
For comparison, staff reviewed the existing development standards in the citywide R-10 Medium Density Residential District The R-10 district has a 45-foot maximum height, 6,000-sf minimum lot size, minimum lot width of 65 feet for corner lots and 60 feet for interior lots, 40 percent maximum lot coverage, a 5-foot minimum side yard setback, a 20-foot minimum front yard setback, and 10-foot minimum rear yard setback. The maximum density allowed in the R-10 district is 10 du/ac.
Staff recommends that the City Council provide feedback on the proposed lot sizes and setbacks and make recommendations on any modifications they would like to see implemented.
Site Layout and Building Design
The City of Antioch adopted citywide Single-Family and Missing Middle Residential Objective Design Standards relating to all aspects of residential projects including building siting, architectural style, parking, and landscaping. The submittal of the Objective Design Standards Checklist will be required at the time of the Design Review application to illustrate compliance in the future. The Objective Design Standards Checklist will include relevant guidelines, how the project complies with them, and a detailed discussion of the issues.
Building Siting and Massing
adjacent streets with varying setbacks to present an attractive façade to the right-of-way.
The proposed plans show the potential plotting of the single-family units with slightly varying setbacks, and the six renter-occupied units look to have the same front setbacks.
Additionally, the proposed project would offer three complimentary elevations Cottage,
Mediterranean, and Regency.
Architecture
The three proposed architectural styles include varying architectural elements and features board and batten on the upper gables, window trim, and a stucco exterior. The Mediterranean style features a stucco exterior, awnings, a metal corbel, and window trim.
Antioch City Council Report
April 9, 2024 Agenda Item #7 4
The Regency style has lap siding on the second floor, brick veneer, wooden corbels, window trim, and a metal railing accent above the garage.
The two-story residences would be approximately 1,600 to 2,000 sf, with three to four bedrooms and two-car garages with a maximum height of 30 feet. The six renter occupied dwelling unit (JADU). The renter occupied residences would be single-story and 1,737 sf lot including an ADU. Elevations have not yet been provided for the renter occupied residences.
Recreational Amenities
create courtyards, open space areas, and community facilities. Open space areas should be conveniently located for the majority of residents. The proposed project includes a centrally located open space area near the site entrance including a park and bioretention facility. This area contains 6,000 square feet of activity area with amenities appropriate for families. The nearest public park to the proposed development is Almondridge park located over ½ mile away on the south side of E. 18th Street.
Additional active open space areas and increased pedestrian connectivity would comply three additional open space areas intended for bio-retention. One along the northern currently are not proposed for passive recreation. Staff has identified the area south of the proposed EVA access to Walnut Avenue that could be used as additional open space.
Preliminary landscaping plans were provided that identify the proposed street trees along all proposed internal roadways and surrounding the proposed stormwater quality treatment areas. In addition, each proposed residential lot includes front yard landscaping consisting of one tree and shrubs. Landscaping would need to be consistent with the -Family and Missing Middle Residential Objective Design Standards.
Given the lack of nearby parks and open space staff recommends the City Council provide feedback on the amount of proposed active open space in the development.
Circulation, Parking, and Utilities
The proposed project includes primary site access through the proposed Vineyard Drive extension. The proposed internal roadway network includes 36-foot-wide neighborhood streets with a proposed 42-foot-wide right of way. The Antioch Engineering Department provided comments on street sections, traffic, parking, noise, grading, and utilities.
emergency vehicle access. All residential lots will also need to have proper sight distance Antioch City Council Report
April 9, 2024 Agenda Item #7 5
of 25 feet at the driveways and all intersections provide proper sight distance of 50 feet at each corner. The project needs to include sidewalks in front of all residential lots, on both sides of the street, provide ADA ramps at corners of street intersections, and show crosswalks along the residential lots for amenity access. City standards call for a 46-foot minimum right-of-way from back of sidewalks, 11-foot travel lanes, eight-foot shoulders for parking, and five-foot sidewalks on both sides of the street. Rolled curbs and increased bulb out pavement on all streets with 90-degree bends is also required. Plans must demonstrate on every street bend how a single unit 50-foot truck and a 40-foot bus design vehicle per Caltrans Highway Design will not hit parked cars along the curbs or hit other passenger cars trying to make the same turn from the opposite direction. The location of truck, emergency vehicles and the bins to be collected with trash collection single unit 40- foot trucks. Additionally, a diagram must be provided showing an emergency vehicle and full-size vehicle will be able to simultaneously pass through the open security gate. The minimum clear span opening is 28 feet minimum. Firetrucks must also be able to maneuver through the site without hitting any parked cars, structures, sidewalks and keeping within the face curb lines of residential streets.
A noise and traffic study will be required to identify any traffic circulation issues in the project and document all needed mitigation measures necessary to offset the increase in vehicle trips that will be generated by this development. A parking study would also be needed, documenting the number of parking stalls required, the number of stalls available within the development, and how many stalls would be available for visitors. Parking space requirements must be consistent with the single-family residential detached requirements of two spaces per unit in a garage, plus one guest parking space on the street within close proximity to the unit served.
A site-specific geotechnical report and a soils report to document the feasibility of the development on the project site would be required. The report needs to conduct critical soil strength tests for the foundation design of homes, soils borings and soil analysis for the design of retaining walls. Retaining walls would be constructed along the PG&E right- of-way and along the existing lots west of the development. The City would like to remove any slopes that encumber these adjacent properties or other structures a part of the project.
Preparation of a sewer drain model of the downstream detention basin located adjacent to the project must show the water surface level and the capacity of the main sewer drain system to the outfall of the river. The submittal must include stormwater area sizing calculations for the proposed stormwater quality areas. Engineering does not support the two small detention basins within the residential lots because they would be costly to maintain.
All required utilities must be shown on the utility plans including electrical, communication, street lighting, utility boxes, and fire hydrants. Street light detail, including layout of the streetlights and placement photo metric analysis need to show compliance with the city Antioch City Council Report
April 9, 2024 Agenda Item #7 6
street standard lighting criteria. In addition, all three overhead electrical lines, easements -
foot PG&E easement need to be shown on the plans.
Public Comments
In addition to the City receiving comments from City Engineering, comment letters were received from the Contra Costa County Flood Control District, Chevron, and PG&E. The Contra Costa County Flood Control District provided standard comments and provided a summary of drainage fees. Chevron provided a comment letter identifying there are no Chevron Pipe Line Company-owned/operated facilities within the proposed project site.
PG&E stated the applicant must execute the necessary PG&E property management agreement and California Public Utilities Commission (C.P.U.C.) 851 filing and approval Additionally, the applicant must provide detailed profile plans, proposed roadway grading plan, existing/new drainage scheme, and any crossing third party utilities planned in the proposed roadway for review. PG&E requires project plans to show gas transmission pipelines and substructure depth verifications. Any proposed grading and or landscaping -of-way must be reviewed and approved by PG&E
engineering prior to any work commencing.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
On February 21, 2024, the Antioch Planning Commission held a public hearing and provided comments and feedback to the applicant regarding the Preliminary Development Plan.
The Planning Commission was in support of the affordable housing component but did not support the narrow roads, the four-foot setbacks, and the small park that would not seem to offer much benefit to the residents. The Commissioners requested additional recreational open spaces, native landscaping, and redesigned streets to accommodate pedestrians.
Public Comments
Members of the public also spoke on the project, expressing concerns for the small parks and a lack of active recreational opportunities and the need to integrate local and native plant species into the development.
CONCLUSION
Staff recommends that the City Council provide the applicant feedback concerning the proposed project. Specifically, staff recommends feedback on the following items:
Antioch City Council Report
April 9, 2024 Agenda Item #7 7
Proposed General Plan land use amendment to allow residential development in the Eastern Waterfront Employment Focus Area and East 18th street specific plan area.
Proposed lot sizes and setbacks.
Proposed amount of active open space.
Proposed street widths and sidewalks.
ATTACHMENTS
A.
B. Project Plans
C. Agency Comments
D. February 21, 2024 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
ATTACHMENT A
A1
A2
A3
A4
ATTACHMENT B
B1
B2
B3
B4
B5
2015246 - Jardine - Martinez, CA
B6
2015246 - Jardine - Martinez, CA
B7
2015246 - Jardine - Martinez, CA
B8
2015246 - Jardine - Martinez, CA
B9
B10
Memorandum
Date: January 26, 2024
Re: Engineering review of the Preliminary Development Plan for Rancho Meadows, “Vineyards and Santa Fe Property”
List of Engineering requirements
General Comments
1. within the 100-foot
2. that are boundary.
3. A will be required any in
document a
.
4. a parking plan
met.
that . We
a of the the and
,
5. sound study of
Sheet 1 – Site Plan
6. have proper sight distance and
feet at each corner -5.1101
7. the
without .
8. in front of , ADA of
, and that are needed for
.
ATTACHMENT C
C1
, and within the
.
-
on every end how a SU 50 truck and a 40’
or hit other
.
10. what
the community city.
11. , are -
(detached)
” -5.1703.1.
12. he
-5.601.
13. very 46-foot
minimum from back of 11-foot - for
, and 5-foot reet.
14. minimum , -4.1001.
15. 16. area
Sheet 2 – Grading Plan
17. Submit a - geotechnical report to for , ,
, data in the area
and
.
18. 1’ and ed
and
erimeter boundary.
erimeter
20. and
that encumber the
.
s
21. are
on the
and hydrant
C2
22. -chance (100- boundary to .
an SD
and the main SD to the of
the river.
23. area the many
for the
. two
24. a a area of the water for
Th area water main
Wi bur Avenue, 18th avenue .
water
. If the
water then that to be
25. a
the and
document if the ha
t. If there are
need recommended.
26. a of each
for both , and the
with SU-40
27. . The minimum
28. , face of
.
within the
meet city .
C3
Plan Review Team
Land Management
[email protected]
PG&E Gas and Electric Facilities Page 1
PG&E Gas and Electric Facilities Page 1
Public
December 26, 2023
Kevin Scudero
City of Antioch
200 H Street
Antioch, CA 94509
Ref: Gas and Electric Transmission and Distribution
Dear Kevin Scudero,
Thank you for submitting the PRE2023-0002 plans for our review. PG&E will review the submitted plans in relationship to any existing Gas and Electric facilities within the project area.
If the proposed project is adjacent/or within PG&E owned property and/or easements, we will be working with you to ensure compatible uses and activities near our facilities.
Attached you will find information and requirements as it relates to Gas facilities (Attachment 1) and Electric facilities (Attachment 2). Please review these in detail, as it is critical to ensure your safety and to protect PG&E’s facilities and its existing rights.
Below is additional information for your review:
1. This plan review process does not replace the application process for PG&E gas or electric service your project may require. For these requests, please continue to work with PG&E Service Planning: https://www.pge.com/en_US/business/services/building- and-renovation/overview/overview.page .
2. If the project being submitted is part of a larger project, please include the entire scope of your project, and not just a portion of it. PG&E’s facilities are to be incorporated within any CEQA document. PG&E needs to verify that the CEQA document will identify any required future PG&E services.
3. An engineering deposit may be required to review plans for a project depending on the size, scope, and location of the project and as it relates to any rearrangement or new installation of PG&E facilities.
Any proposed uses within the PG&E fee strip and/or easement, may include a California Public Utility Commission (CPUC) Section 851 filing. This requires the CPUC to render approval for a conveyance of rights for specific uses on PG&E’s fee strip or easement. PG&E will advise if the necessity to incorporate a CPUC Section 851filing is required.
This letter does not constitute PG&E’s consent to use any portion of its easement for any purpose not previously conveyed. PG&E will provide a project specific response as required.
Sincerely,
Plan Review Team
Land Management
C4
PG&E Gas and Electric Facilities Page 2
PG&E Gas and Electric Facilities Page 2
Public
Attachment 1 – Gas Facilities
There could be gas transmission pipelines in this area which would be considered critical facilities for PG&E and a high priority subsurface installation under California law. Care must be taken to ensure safety and accessibility. So, please ensure that if PG&E approves work near gas transmission pipelines it is done in adherence with the below stipulations. Additionally, the following link provides additional information regarding legal requirements under California excavation laws: https://www.usanorth811.org/images/pdfs/CA-LAW-2018.pdf
1. Standby Inspection: A PG&E Gas Transmission Standby Inspector must be present during any demolition or construction activity that comes within 10 feet of the gas pipeline. This includes all grading, trenching, substructure depth verifications (potholes), asphalt or concrete demolition/removal, removal of trees, signs, light poles, etc. This inspection can be coordinated through the Underground Service Alert (USA) service at 811. A minimum notice of 48 hours is required. Ensure the USA markings and notifications are maintained throughout the duration of your work.
2. Access: At any time, PG&E may need to access, excavate, and perform work on the gas pipeline. Any construction equipment, materials, or spoils may need to be removed upon notice.
Any temporary construction fencing installed within PG&E’s easement would also need to be capable of being removed at any time upon notice. Any plans to cut temporary slopes exceeding a 1:4 grade within 10 feet of a gas transmission pipeline need to be approved by PG&E Pipeline Services in writing PRIOR to performing the work.
3. Wheel Loads: To prevent damage to the buried gas pipeline, there are weight limits that must be enforced whenever any equipment gets within 10 feet of traversing the pipe.
Ensure a list of the axle weights of all equipment being used is available for PG&E’s Standby Inspector. To confirm the depth of cover, the pipeline may need to be potholed by hand in a few areas.
Due to the complex variability of tracked equipment, vibratory compaction equipment, and cranes, PG&E must evaluate those items on a case-by-case basis prior to use over the gas pipeline (provide a list of any proposed equipment of this type noting model numbers and specific attachments).
No equipment may be set up over the gas pipeline while operating. Ensure crane outriggers are at least 10 feet from the centerline of the gas pipeline. Transport trucks must not be parked over the gas pipeline while being loaded or unloaded.
4. Grading: PG&E requires a minimum of 36 inches of cover over gas pipelines (or existing grade if less) and a maximum of 7 feet of cover at all locations. The graded surface cannot exceed a cross slope of 1:4.
5. Excavating: Any digging within 2 feet of a gas pipeline must be dug by hand. Note that while the minimum clearance is only 24 inches, any excavation work within 24 inches of the edge of a pipeline must be done with hand tools. So to avoid having to dig a trench entirely with hand tools, the edge of the trench must be over 24 inches away. (Doing the math for a 24 inch C5
PG&E Gas and Electric Facilities Page 3
PG&E Gas and Electric Facilities Page 3
Public
wide trench being dug along a 36 inch pipeline, the centerline of the trench would need to be at least 54 inches [24/2 + 24 + 36/2 = 54] away, or be entirely dug by hand.)
Water jetting to assist vacuum excavating must be limited to 1000 psig and directed at a 40° angle to the pipe. All pile driving must be kept a minimum of 3 feet away.
Any plans to expose and support a PG&E gas transmission pipeline across an open excavation need to be approved by PG&E Pipeline Services in writing PRIOR to performing the work.
6. Boring/Trenchless Installations: PG&E Pipeline Services must review and approve all plans to bore across or parallel to (within 10 feet) a gas transmission pipeline. There are stringent criteria to pothole the gas transmission facility at regular intervals for all parallel bore installations.
For bore paths that cross gas transmission pipelines perpendicularly, the pipeline must be potholed a minimum of 2 feet in the horizontal direction of the bore path and a minimum of 24 inches in the vertical direction from the bottom of the pipe with minimum clearances measured from the edge of the pipe in both directions. Standby personnel must watch the locator trace (and every ream pass) the path of the bore as it approaches the pipeline and visually monitor the pothole (with the exposed transmission pipe) as the bore traverses the pipeline to ensure adequate clearance with the pipeline. The pothole width must account for the inaccuracy of the locating equipment.
7. Substructures: All utility crossings of a gas pipeline should be made as close to perpendicular as feasible (90° +/- 15°). All utility lines crossing the gas pipeline must have a minimum of 24 inches of separation from the gas pipeline. Parallel utilities, pole bases, water line ‘kicker blocks’, storm drain inlets, water meters, valves, back pressure devices or other utility substructures are not allowed in the PG&E gas pipeline easement.
If previously retired PG&E facilities are in conflict with proposed substructures, PG&E must verify they are safe prior to removal. This includes verification testing of the contents of the facilities, as well as environmental testing of the coating and internal surfaces. Timelines for PG&E completion of this verification will vary depending on the type and location of facilities in conflict.
8. Structures: No structures are to be built within the PG&E gas pipeline easement. This includes buildings, retaining walls, fences, decks, patios, carports, septic tanks, storage sheds, tanks, loading ramps, or any structure that could limit PG&E’s ability to access its facilities.
9. Fencing: Permanent fencing is not allowed within PG&E easements except for perpendicular crossings which must include a 16 foot wide gate for vehicular access. Gates will be secured with PG&E corporation locks.
10. Landscaping: Landscaping must be designed to allow PG&E to access the pipeline for maintenance and not interfere with pipeline coatings or other cathodic protection systems. No trees, shrubs, brush, vines, and other vegetation may be planted within the easement area.
Only those plants, ground covers, grasses, flowers, and low-growing plants that grow unsupported to a maximum of four feet (4’) in height at maturity may be planted within the easement area.
C6
PG&E Gas and Electric Facilities Page 4
PG&E Gas and Electric Facilities Page 4
Public
11. Cathodic Protection: PG&E pipelines are protected from corrosion with an “Impressed Current” cathodic protection system. Any proposed facilities, such as metal conduit, pipes, service lines, ground rods, anodes, wires, etc. that might affect the pipeline cathodic protection system must be reviewed and approved by PG&E Corrosion Engineering.
12. Pipeline Marker Signs: PG&E needs to maintain pipeline marker signs for gas transmission pipelines in order to ensure public awareness of the presence of the pipelines.
With prior written approval from PG&E Pipeline Services, an existing PG&E pipeline marker sign that is in direct conflict with proposed developments may be temporarily relocated to accommodate construction work. The pipeline marker must be moved back once construction is complete.
13. PG&E is also the provider of distribution facilities throughout many of the areas within the state of California. Therefore, any plans that impact PG&E’s facilities must be reviewed and approved by PG&E to ensure that no impact occurs which may endanger the safe operation of its facilities.
C7
PG&E Gas and Electric Facilities Page 5
PG&E Gas and Electric Facilities Page 5
Public
Attachment 2 – Electric Facilities
It is PG&E’s policy to permit certain uses on a case by case basis within its electric transmission fee strip(s) and/or easement(s) provided such uses and manner in which they are exercised, will not interfere with PG&E’s rights or endanger its facilities. Some examples/restrictions are as follows:
1. Buildings and Other Structures: No buildings or other structures including the foot print and eave of any buildings, swimming pools, wells or similar structures will be permitted within fee strip(s) and/or easement(s) areas. PG&E’s transmission easement shall be designated on subdivision/parcel maps as “RESTRICTED USE AREA – NO BUILDING.”
2. Grading: Cuts, trenches or excavations may not be made within 25 feet of our towers.
Developers must submit grading plans and site development plans (including geotechnical reports if applicable), signed and dated, for PG&E’s review. PG&E engineers must review grade changes in the vicinity of our towers. No fills will be allowed which would impair ground-to- conductor clearances. Towers shall not be left on mounds without adequate road access to base of tower or structure.
3. Fences: Walls, fences, and other structures must be installed at locations that do not affect the safe operation of PG&’s facilities. Heavy equipment access to our facilities must be maintained at all times. Metal fences are to be grounded to PG&E specifications. No wall, fence or other like structure is to be installed within 10 feet of tower footings and unrestricted access must be maintained from a tower structure to the nearest street. Walls, fences and other structures proposed along or within the fee strip(s) and/or easement(s) will require PG&E review; submit plans to PG&E Centralized Review Team for review and comment.
4. Landscaping: Vegetation may be allowed; subject to review of plans. On overhead electric transmission fee strip(s) and/or easement(s), trees and shrubs are limited to those varieties that do not exceed 10 feet in height at maturity. PG&E must have access to its facilities at all times, including access by heavy equipment. No planting is to occur within the footprint of the tower legs. Greenbelts are encouraged.
5. Reservoirs, Sumps, Drainage Basins, and Ponds: Prohibited within PG&E’s fee strip(s) and/or easement(s) for electric transmission lines.
6. Automobile Parking: Short term parking of movable passenger vehicles and light trucks (pickups, vans, etc.) is allowed. The lighting within these parking areas will need to be reviewed by PG&E; approval will be on a case by case basis. Heavy equipment access to PG&E facilities is to be maintained at all times. Parking is to clear PG&E structures by at least 10 feet.
Protection of PG&E facilities from vehicular traffic is to be provided at developer’s expense AND to PG&E specifications. Blocked-up vehicles are not allowed. Carports, canopies, or awnings are not allowed.
7. Storage of Flammable, Explosive or Corrosive Materials: There shall be no storage of fuel or combustibles and no fueling of vehicles within PG&E’s easement. No trash bins or incinerators are allowed.
C8
PG&E Gas and Electric Facilities Page 6
PG&E Gas and Electric Facilities Page 6
Public
8. Streets and Roads: Access to facilities must be maintained at all times. Street lights may be allowed in the fee strip(s) and/or easement(s) but in all cases must be reviewed by PG&E for proper clearance. Roads and utilities should cross the transmission easement as nearly at right angles as possible. Road intersections will not be allowed within the transmission easement.
9. Pipelines: Pipelines may be allowed provided crossings are held to a minimum and to be as nearly perpendicular as possible. Pipelines within 25 feet of PG&E structures require review by PG&E. Sprinklers systems may be allowed; subject to review. Leach fields and septic tanks are not allowed. Construction plans must be submitted to PG&E for review and approval prior to the commencement of any construction.
10. Signs: Signs are not allowed except in rare cases subject to individual review by PG&E.
11. Recreation Areas: Playgrounds, parks, tennis courts, basketball courts, barbecue and light trucks (pickups, vans, etc.) may be allowed; subject to review of plans. Heavy equipment access to PG&E facilities is to be maintained at all times. Parking is to clear PG&E structures by at least 10 feet. Protection of PG&E facilities from vehicular traffic is to be provided at developer’s expense AND to PG&E specifications.
12. Construction Activity: Since construction activity will take place near PG&E’s overhead electric lines, please be advised it is the contractor’s responsibility to be aware of, and observe the minimum clearances for both workers and equipment operating near high voltage electric lines set out in the High-Voltage Electrical Safety Orders of the California Division of Industrial Safety (https://www.dir.ca.gov/Title8/sb5g2.html), as well as any other safety regulations.
Contractors shall comply with California Public Utilities Commission General Order 95 (http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/gos/GO95/go_95_startup_page.html) and all other safety rules. No construction may occur within 25 feet of PG&E’s towers. All excavation activities may only commence after 811 protocols has been followed.
Contractor shall ensure the protection of PG&E’s towers and poles from vehicular damage by (installing protective barriers) Plans for protection barriers must be approved by PG&E prior to construction.
13. PG&E is also the owner of distribution facilities throughout many of the areas within the state of California. Therefore, any plans that impact PG&E’s facilities must be reviewed and approved by PG&E to ensure that no impact occurs that may endanger the safe and reliable operation of its facilities.
C9
Plan Review Team
Land Management
[email protected]
PG&E Gas and Electric Facilities Page 1
PG&E Gas and Electric Facilities Page 1
Public
January 25, 2024
Kevin Scudero
City of Antioch
200 H Street
Antioch, CA 94509
Re: Ranch Meadows PRE2023-0002
E 18th Street, Antioch, CA 94509
APN: 051-052-053, 051-082-010
Dear Kevin Scudero,
Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review the subject plans. The proposed PRE2023-0002 is within the same vicinity of PG&E existing facilities that impact this property. located at APN:051-052-024-0. PG&E currently operates and maintains existing gas and electric transmission facilities within said property. The applicant must execute the necessary PG&E property management agreement and California Public Utilities Commission (C.P.U.C.) 851 filing and approval in applicant must provide detailed profile plans, proposed roadway grading plan, existing/new drainage scheme, and any crossing 3rd party utilities planned in proposed roadway (electrical, sewer, water, firewater, etc.) for review. Project plans are to show gas transmission pipelines and substructure depth verifications (potholes).
-of-way must be
reviewed and approved by PG&E engineering prior to any work commencing.
Please contact the Building and Renovation Center (BRSC) for facility map requests by calling 1-877- 743-7782 and at www.pge.com/cco for any modification or relocation requests, or for any additional services you may require.
As a reminder, before any digging or excavation occurs, please contact Underground Service Alert (USA) by dialing 811 a minimum of 2 working days prior to commencing any work. This free and independent service will ensure that all existing underground utilities are identified and marked on-site.
If you have any questions regarding our response, please contact me at [email protected].
Sincerely,
Brian Callaghan
Land Management
(925) 204-4074
C10
1 Kevin Valente
From: Scudero, Kevin <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2024 4:35 PM
To: Kevin Valente
Subject: FW: Rancho Meadows - RFC
Attachments: Drainage Fee Calc DA 29J.pdf
Kevin Scudero
Acting Community Development Director
: 925-779-6159 (Main)
: 925-779-6133 (Direct)
: www.antiochca.gov
City of Antioch | P.O. Box 5007, Antioch, CA 94531-5007 From: Alexander Zandian <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2024 4:29 PM
To: Scudero, Kevin <[email protected]>
Subject: Rancho Meadows RFC
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Hello,
The Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conserva on District (FC District) has reviewed the Rancho Meadow Preliminary Development Plan located at (APN 051 052 053) in the City of An och. We have the following comments and recommenda ons:
1. The DA 29J fee for this project is estimated to be $481,000 based on total number of lots charged at the Single Family Residential rate. Please see the enclosed spreadsheet for our drainage fee calculation.
2. The District is not the approving local agency for this project as defined by the Subdivision Map Act. As a special district, the District has an independent authority to collect drainage fees that is not restricted by the Subdivision Map Act. The District reviews the drainage fee rate every year the ordinance is in effect, and adjusts the rate annually on January 1 to account for inflation. The drainage fee rate does not vest at the time of tentative map approval. The drainage fees due and payable will be based on the fee in effect at the time of fee collection.
C11
2 3. We recommend that the City condition the developer to design and construct storm drain facilities to adequately collect and convey stormwater entering or originating within the development to the nearest adequate man made drainage facility or natural watercourse, without diversion of the watershed.
4. The developer should be required to submit hydrology and hydraulic calculations to the city that prove the adequacy of the in tract drainage system and the downstream drainage system. We defer review of the local drainage to the city. However, the FC District is available to provide technical review under our Fee for Service program.
5. We recommend that the City condition the developer to contact the appropriate environmental regulatory agencies such as the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, State Department of Fish and Wildlife, and State Regional Water Quality Control Board to obtain all the necessary permits for this project, or show that such permits are not necessary.
6. The Applicant should be required to comply with the current National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements under the City Stormwater Management and Discharge Control Ordinances and the C.3 Guidebook. We support the States goal of providing best management practices to achieve the permanent reduction or elimination of stormwater pollutants and downstream erosion from new development. The FC District is available to provide technical assistance for meeting these requirements under our Fee for Service program.
7. Review of development plans and hydrology and hydraulic calculations for conformance with our drainage area plan falls under our Fee for Service program. Calculation of the eligible construction costs and fee credit also falls under our Fee for Service program.
We appreciate the opportunity to comment on Rancho Meadows development and welcome con nued coordina on. If you should have any ques ons, please contact me by phone at (925) 313 2052 or by em ail at [email protected] .
Thanks,
Alexander Zandian
Sta Engineer
Contra Costa County Public Works Department
Flood Control & Water Conserva on District
255 Glacier Drive, Mar nez, CA 94553
O ce: (925) 313 2052
Fax: (925) 313 2333
Website: www.cccpublicworks.org
Accredited by the American Public Works Association
C12
Rancho Meadows Date: 17-Jan-24
051-051-053 Fee Schedule: 2024 Ordinance: 2002-29
29J Building Subdivision
Unit Price QTY Amount Unit Price QTY Amount
Commercial/Industrial/Downtown 32,074$ - 34,453$ - Office (Medium) 27,487 - 30,716 - Office (Light) 23,002 - 25,927 - Building Subdivision
Multifamily Residences Unit Price QTY Amount Unit Price QTY Amount Less than 2,500 square ft of land 25,272$ - 25,272$ - 2,500-2,999 (square feet per unit) 1,498 - 1,498 - 3,000-3,999 1,716 - 1,716 - 4,000-4,999 1,997 - 1,997 - 5,000-5,999 2,285 - 2,285 - 6,000-6,999 2,566 - 2,566 - 7,000-7,999 2,839 - 2,839 - 8,000 + 2,980 - 2,980 -
Building Subdivision
Single Family Residential Unit Price QTY Amount Unit Price QTY Amount 4,000-4,999 (square feet per unit) 2,098$ - 3,362$ 143 480,766.00 5,000-5,999 2,192 - 3,502 - 6,000-6,999 2,285 - 3,643 - 7,000-7,999 2,379 - 3,783 - 8,000-9,999 2,519 - 3,986 - 10,000-13,999 2,800 - 4,391 - 14,000-19,999 3,268 - 5,054 - 20,000-29,999 4,040 - 6,061 - 30,000-39,999 5,015 - 7,238 - 40,000 + 6,014 - 8,338 -
- - 143 480,766
FALSE
Amount of Unit Price Amount #
impervious surface.
to account for:
### FALSE FALSE
FALSE
n/a
####
Comments: $0.00
G:\fldctl\CurDev\CITIES\Antioch\3029J-06\051-052-053, Rancho Meadows\[Drainage Fee Calc.xlsx]Worksheet Print Date:
TOTAL:
0.78 -$
Calculate DA 130 fee if checked
Sqr Ft.
0 $480,766.00
Summary of Drainage Fees
Development #:
APN:
Drainage Area:
Mark box to add mitigation fee
January 25, 2024
This estimate is based on the Preliminary Development Plan and Project Description by CBG, dated May 2023. The fees total $480,766 for 143 lots subdivided at the single family residential rate.
Prepared by:
C13
5-1
Agenda Item #
CITY OF ANTIOCH
PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
Regular Meeting February 21, 2024
6:30 P.M. City Council Chambers
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chairperson Gutilla called the meeting to order at 6:30 P.M. on Wednesday, February 21, 2024, in Council Chambers.
2. ROLL CALL
Present: Commissioners Jones, Lutz, Martin, Vice Chairperson Riley and Chairperson Gutilla
Absent: Commissioner Hills
Staff: Outside Legal Counsel, Ruthann Ziegler
Acting Director of Community Development, Kevin Scudero Acting Planning Manager, Zoe Merideth
Contract Planner, Kevin Valente
Contract Engineer, Kevin Van Katwyk
Minutes Clerk, Kitty Eiden
Acting Planning Manager Merideth introduced Nathan Tinclair, Associate Planner.
The Planning Commission welcomed Associate Planner Sinclair to the City.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Chairperson Gutilla led the Pledge of Allegiance.
4. PUBLIC COMMENT
Alexander Broom requested the Planning Commission agendize consideration of installing traffic calming measures on Hillcrest Avenue and Davidson Drive at Deer Valley Road.
5. CONSENT CALENDAR
Commissioner Martin requested Consent Calendar Item 5-2 be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate consideration.
5-1. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes December 6, 2023
5-3. Creekside Vineyards Extension | GP-9-06, PD-19-02 | APN 057-050-024 Two- year extension request of the Creekside Vineyards at Sand Creek Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map 9501 and Design Review Approvals.
ATTACHMENT D
D1
Planning Commission
Regular Meeting
February 21, 2024 Page 2 of 13
On motion by Commissioner Riley, seconded by Commissioner Lutz the Planning Commission members present unanimously approved Consent Calendar Items 5-1 and 5-3. The motion carried the following vote:
AYES: Jones, Lutz, Martin, Riley, Gutilla
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Hills
5-2. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes January 17, 2024
Commissioner Martin stated he had requested this item be considered separately because he was absent and would be abstaining from the vote.
Chairperson Gutilla stated she was also absent from the meeting and would be abstaining.
In response to Commissioner Riley, Outside Legal Counsel Ziegler clarified that five Commissioners were present this evening so if the Planning Commission approved the minutes by three votes, it would be a majority of the quorum which would be sufficient for this matter.
On motion by Commissioner Riley, seconded by Commissioner Lutz the Planning Commission approved Consent Calendar Item 5-2. The motion carried the following vote:
AYES: Jones, Lutz, Riley
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: Martin, Gutilla
ABSENT: Hills
6. NEW PUBLIC HEARING
6-1. Laurel Ranch Car Wash | PDP22-01 | APN 053-060-064 The applicant requests Preliminary Development Plan (PDP) review of a new 2,800 square foot carwash with 18 vacuum stations and a 2,500 square foot convenience store. The proposed project includes 35 parking spaces, inclusive of the 18 vacuum stalls. Associated improvements including landscaping and stormwater control facilities are also proposed. The project is located at the southwest corner of Laurel Road and Country Hills Drive.
Acting Planning Manager Merideth presented the staff report dated February 21, 2024, recommending the Planning Commission provide the applicant with feedback regarding the proposal.
Julio Tinajero, Milestone Associates presented a history of the project and the revised site plan based on feedback received from the Planning Commission on their previous submittal.
Chairperson Gutilla opened the public comment period.
D2
Planning Commission
Regular Meeting
February 21, 2024 Page 3 of 13
Laura Kindsvater advocated for the Planning Commission to mandate that the applicant increase the proportion of native plant species in their project to over 70%.
An unidentified speaker expressed concern about the project's egress during peak traffic hours.
Additionally, this speaker expressed support for alternative commercial uses for the site.
Alexander Broom shared the sentiment expressed by the previous speaker regarding alternative commercial uses for the site.
Chairperson Gutilla closed the public comment period.
In response to Commissioner Martin, Acting Planning Manager Merideth provided clarification regarding the General Plan and East Lone Tree Specific Plan map designation for the site and specified that the stand-alone parking was situated behind the convenience store.
In response to Commissioner Martin, Contract Engineer Kevin Van Katwyk reviewed option layout 1 and 2 (staff report attachment D2 and D3).
Commissioner Martin voiced opposition to the project but expressed conditional support for specific aspects if the project were to be approved. These included:
Elimination of the 360-degree turn to enter the carwash.
Elimination of parking behind the building.
Support for the current building design.
Inclusion of a noise, light and traffic survey.
Increasing the proportion of native plant species.
Reduction in hours of operation to 5:00 A.M. – 10:00 P.M.
Commissioner Lutz echoed the sentiments expressed by Commissioner Martin and offered additional feedback for the project, which included:
Elimination of the carwash.
Revising the project into a convenience store with adequate parking.
Concern regarding traffic in the area and the circulation plan.
Commissioner Jones requested the results of the site feasibility study and outreach to the neighboring community be provided if the project returned to the Commission.
Commissioner Riley stated he opposed the previous project submittal but acknowledged that while it may not be the most desirable use of the site, it could still provide convenience for residents in the area. He highlighted the unique characteristics of the parcel, noting its odd shape, and expressed a desire to see development take place on the site.
Chairperson Gutilla outlined several concerns and areas of support regarding the project:
Concerns:
D3
Planning Commission
Regular Meeting
February 21, 2024 Page 4 of 13
Smell of recycled water.
Trash generated from customers.
Noise impacts.
Traffic impacts and circulation plan.
Parking behind the building.
Location of the trash receptacle.
Support:
Reduction in hours of operation.
Increasing native species in landscaping.
Installing canopies over vacuum stations.
Revising the project as electric vehicle (EV) charging stations and an indoor play structure for customers.
Chairperson Gutilla expressed her general opposition to the project while acknowledging the removal of the gas station. She thanked the applicant for this change and noted the unique nature of the parcel.
Commissioner Riley offered conditional support for aspects of the project, should it proceed:
Removal of vacuum stations closest to residential lots.
Relocating the trash receptacle behind the structure and potentially replacing it with parking spaces.
Support for a variance for canopies over vacuum facilities contingent upon ensuring they would not obstruct line of sight for traffic.
Chairperson Gutilla closed the Commissioner comment period and thanked the applicant for bringing the project forward.
In response to Mr. Tinajero’s requests for an opportunity to respond to comments, Chairperson Gutilla reopened the Commissioner comment period.
Mr. Tinajero expressed gratitude for the feedback provided. He reported that the applicant would be the owner/operator of the project and was locally based. He explained that the applicant purchased the property under the belief that it was zoned for commercial use; however, it was later discovered to be zoned residential. He noted this discrepancy created challenges for the project's development, especially considering the parcel's size and shape, which may not be suitable for residential development. He requested the Planning Commission consider the circumstances under which the property was purchased, and the challenges posed by the zoning discrepancy. He emphasized that commercial zoning across the street supported the feasibility of commercial development on the property. He highlighted the necessity for revenue-generating options to make the project economically viable. He provided an overview of the site circulation plan.
Chairperson Gutilla agreed that the site was inconsistent with residential development.
D4
Planning Commission
Regular Meeting
February 21, 2024 Page 5 of 13
Acting Director of Community Development Scudero explained that the parcel was initially designated to serve as the stormwater retention area for the development across the street. He confirmed that preliminary meetings were held with the applicant under the assumption that the parcel was zoned for commercial use. He clarified that during these discussions, staff expressed reservations about the proposed gas station/carwash development, but the applicant chose to proceed. He suggested that the Planning Commission provide feedback on what type of development should occur on the site.
Commissioner Lutz stated he would prefer a large convenience store and hydrogen charging station occur on this site.
Commissioner Jones stated she would prefer an EV charging station with a convenience store.
Commissioner Riley stated he preferred a large convenience store or coffee shop.
Commissioner Martin stated he preferred a single use commercial development such as a large convenience store, deli or coffee shop.
Chairperson Gutilla stated she agreed with the previously suggested alternative uses for the parcel. Specifically, she supported the idea of developing a large convenience store with a deli or bagel shop, emphasizing the importance of ample parking, and limiting operating hours.
Chairperson Gutilla closed the Commission comment period.
6-2 Leung Properties | PDP23-02 | APN 057-041-013, 015, 016: The applicant requests a Preliminary Development Plan review of a proposal to construct a 435- unit residential development over a 160-acre vacant project site (APNs 057-041- 013, 057-041-015, 057-041-016). The proposed project includes the development of 50 conventional single family detached units, 385 clustered single family detached residential units, and 159 row townhomes. The project also includes a recreation center, two neighborhood parks, and walking trails. Primary site access would be from Sand Creek Road.
Acting Director of Community Development Scudero introduced Contract Planner Valente who presented the staff report dated February 21, 2024, recommending the Planning Commission provide direction to the applicant for the Final Development Plan Submittal.
Kyle Masters, Richland Communities / The Ranch Phase 4, gave a brief overview of the project map.
Terry Gallaway / The Gallaway Group / The Ranch Phase 4, gave a PowerPoint presentation of their master plan, conceptual site plan, open space, technical site plan, architecture, and conceptual street scene.
Chairperson Gutilla opened the public comment period.
D5
Planning Commission
Regular Meeting
February 21, 2024 Page 6 of 13
Juan Pablo Galvan Martinez, Senior Land Use Manager at Save Mount Diablo, reported they had engaged with the developer of The Ranch project, leading to a mutually satisfactory resolution regarding the buffer along Sand Creek and the dedication of open space. He expressed satisfaction that a similar proposal was being put forth for the project under consideration. He requested the City and Planning Commission consider tracking the cap on housing units for the Sand Creek Focus Area.
Laura Kindsvater advocated for the Planning Commission to mandate that the applicant enhance the proportion of keystone and native plant species to exceed 70% for the housing units and parks. She proposed restoration efforts in the natural areas along Sand Creek and expressed support for buildings facing the creek.
Alexander Broom spoke in support of the perimeter walkway and advocated for the inclusion of a greater variety of drought tolerant native plant species throughout the development. He stressed the importance of wildfire mitigation measures and expressed apprehension regarding evacuation routes from the area. He suggested the implementation of cool roofs. He inquired about the width of the trail and proposed the addition of other amenities to enhance the area.
An unidentified speaker raised concerns about the project's trajectory, noting that the applicant intended to secure entitlements before selling it to a builder. He also expressed concern regarding the elimination of estate housing and questioned the potential implications for the City's RHNA numbers. He highlighted the proposed density increase without consideration for affordable housing. He suggested the construction of a gated community with an Homeowners Association (HOA) and increased lot sizes.
Chairperson Gutilla closed the public comment period.
In response to Commissioner Jones, Mr. Gallaway reviewed the square footage allocated for each product type.
In response to the Commission, Acting Director of Community Development Scudero clarified that the term "single-family missing middle objective design standards" pertained to housing types rather than income levels. He also indicated that staff was not aware of any instances of flooding in the area under consideration.
Mr. Masters clarified that the project included detention measures for all runoff. He mentioned plans to construct a detention basin adjacent to existing basins, which would eventually integrate into the park and open space area surrounding the trail system. He highlighted the connectivity of the project to The Ranch and East Bay Regional Park’s trail systems.
In response to Commissioner Lutz, Mr. Masters clarified that bridges for the project would be elevated above the 300-year flood protection level, emerging from abutments. He mentioned the possibility of exploring emergency vehicle access to the area as well. He affirmed their commitment to adhering to the City's regulations concerning landscaping and the incorporation of native species. Additionally, he expressed openness to consider the inclusion of an affordable housing component.
D6
Planning Commission
Regular Meeting
February 21, 2024 Page 7 of 13
Commissioner Lutz expressed his support for incorporating an affordable housing component into the project.
Mr. Masters discussed the importance of offering a diverse range of housing options that catered to individuals from various backgrounds.
In response to Commissioner Lutz, Acting Director of Community Development Scudero clarified that a planned development zone permitted flexibility regarding setbacks.
In response to Commissioner Lutz, Mr. Gallaway elaborated on setbacks and circulation plans for the cluster home products. He commented on the water-saving benefits of native plants and mentioned plans to grade the perimeter edge of the open space to facilitate a smooth transition into the project. He requested feedback from the Planning Commission on all aspects of the project. He explained that they typically sold to homebuilders who understood buyer preferences. He clarified that they hadn't proposed apartment-type developments as they didn't perceive a suitable market for it in this location. He emphasized their approach to addressing housing affordability by increasing density to enhance the residual value of the land. Additionally, he mentioned their endeavor to provide housing options suitable for families with children.
Commissioner Lutz expressed concern that increasing density might not necessarily lead to a decrease in housing prices.
Mr. Gallaway mentioned that they were opting for two-story construction as a cost-effective building design approach.
Acting Director of Community Development Scudero reported that the housing element included consideration of an inclusionary housing ordinance, and staff had initiated that process. He further mentioned that these projects could potentially be subject to that ordinance.
Commissioner Riley voiced support for both the project’s density and design. Additionally, he remarked that he wished the project were closer to a highway or transit station. He stated that the area was relatively secluded, emphasizing the importance of having nearby infrastructure for the benefit of residents.
In response to Commissioner Riley, Mr. Gallaway commented that they had secured additional parking on the streets by avoiding driveways that would interrupt parking spaces.
Mr. Masters added that there would be an HOA in place to manage parking along with other aspects of the project.
Commissioner Riley discussed the importance of providing mass transit access to the area.
Commissioner Martin questioned how this project would affect the cap on residential units for this area.
D7
Planning Commission
Regular Meeting
February 21, 2024 Page 8 of 13
Acting Director of Community Development Scudero explained that when the General Plan was adopted in 2003, the Sand Creek Focus Area had a cap of 4000 units. He noted that every project developed since then had requested an increase in density, yet the cap had not been adjusted to accommodate those increases. He further stated his belief that the cap might not be compliant with state law. Therefore, when an entitlement application comes forward, they would need to consult legal counsel to determine if the cap was enforceable or if it needed to be amended.
Commissioner Martin commented he disliked the density; however, he understood that it made the project more affordable. He provided the following feedback:
Concerns regarding General Plan amendments eliminating estate housing and the challenges this would pose in meeting the requirements of the housing element.
Support for the staff's response to the identified engineering issues Support for adhering to the City's guidelines for setbacks to allow for the storage of refuge containers behind fences.
Support for the proposed architecture.
Increasing recreational amenities.
Increasing native plant species.
Enhanced fire resistance measures due to the presence of open space.
Inclusion of a traffic study.
Chairperson Gutilla stated she supported the following:
Incorporating a downstairs bedroom for two-story models.
Support for cul-de-sacs, provided parking was available in the center.
Advocacy for a variety of transition areas between the cul-de-sac communities and open space.
Increasing bike-friendly options, pedestrian access, and vehicle parking at the community center.
Ensuring a smooth transition for landscaping between the open space, trails, and development.
Advocating for additional emergency vehicle access on Deer Valley Road.
Supporting public access for transit opportunities.
Mr. Gallaway explained how each product type would be serviced by the garbage company.
Acting Director of Community Development Scudero stated the first question before the Planning Commission was if they supported the General Plan changes.
Chairperson Gutilla also suggested:
Less density on the perimeter of the project to facilitate a smoother transition to open space.
Support for the staff's response to the identified engineering issues.
D8
Planning Commission
Regular Meeting
February 21, 2024 Page 9 of 13
In response to Commissioner Jones, Acting Director of Community Development Scudero explained that every development in the Sand Creek Focus Area had either increased density or reduced lot sizes from the current General Plan designations. He reiterated that they were in the initial stages of developing an inclusionary housing ordinance and when they selected the consultant, they would discuss timing and its impact on development applications deemed complete. He provided an overview of the City’s current deed restricted affordable housing units.
Chairperson Gutilla closed the Commission comment period.
Chairperson Gutilla declared a recess at 9:29 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 9:38 P.M. with all Commissioners present, except for Commissioner Hills, who was previously reported as absent.
Acting Planning Manager Merideth announced that past practice was that the Commission end the public hearings at 9:30 P.M. She requested that they consider whether they wanted to proceed this evening with the remainder of the agenda. With consensus of the Commission, the Planning Commission agreed to continue with the final public hearing this evening.
6-3 Rancho Meadows PDP | PRE2023-0002 | APN 051-052-053, 051-082-010 The applicant requests a Preliminary Development Plan review of a proposal to construct 143 residential units on a 17.12-acre vacant project site (APNs 051-052-053-9, 051-082-010- 3). The proposed project includes the development of 137 residential lots at approximately 2,600 square-feet (sf) and six residential lots at 4,200 sf. The project also includes one open space area near the project entry consisting of a children’s play area, seating, picnic tables, a shade trellis, and play field. Site access would be provided by an off-site extension of Vineyard Drive across the existing PG&E easement.
Acting Director of Community Development Scudero introduced Contract Planner Valente who presented the staff report dated February 21, 2024, recommending the Planning Commission provide direction to the applicant for the Final Development Plan Submittal.
Kerri Watt, Civic Rancho Meadows Applicant / DeNova Homes, gave a PowerPoint presentation of the Ranch Meadows Project Preliminary Development Plan.
Trent Sanson, Civic Rancho Meadows / Yellow Roof Foundation / Executive VP of DeNova Homes, provided a brief overview of their 501c3 charitable foundation and outlined their proposal to include six renter-occupied low-income units with junior Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs). He explained their request for a general plan amendment and rezone proposal. Additionally, he noted that the current light industrial office use did not appear compatible with adjacent residential zoning.
Kerry Watt commented that they would prioritize the use of as many pollinators and native species as possible. Additionally, she mentioned that the houses would adhere to the City's Objective Design Standards.
Chairperson Gutilla opened the public comment period.
D9
Planning Commission
Regular Meeting
February 21, 2024 Page 10 of 13
Alexander Broom suggested expanding park space and native plant species in the project. He expressed concern for the potential inconsistency of the proposal with the City's Climate Action Resiliency Plan and suggested the proposal align with the current General Plan designation.
Laura Kindsvater requested the Planning Commission require the applicant to increase native plant species to more than 70% with an emphasis on locally native and keystone species. She provided resources to assist the developer in meeting this requirement.
An unidentified speaker voiced his support for the project, highlighting the developer's commitment to offering affordable housing. He mentioned the project’s potential positive impacts. He suggested the developer view Santa Fe Avenue as a traditional right-of-way and prioritize transit and pedestrian connectivity in their planning efforts.
Chairperson Gutilla closed the public comment period.
Commissioner Jones spoke in support of converting office space for housing specifically if it comes with an affordability component. She noted that there was currently less demand for office space, making such a conversion a beneficial use of the property.
Commissioner Lutz voiced his support for the Yellow Roof Foundation, suggesting that it should serve as a model for other developers.
In response to Commissioner Lutz, Contract Planner Valente clarified that if the project were to proceed, it would undergo an environmental review process. He assured that any contamination present at the site would be addressed and remediated as part of the project development process.
Mr. Sanson explained that prior to acquiring the property, an environmental site assessment was conducted which revealed that the site had historically been used as a vineyard. He emphasized their commitment to collaborating with staff on a comprehensive review process through CEQA and their willingness to ensure compliance with environmental regulations.
Commissioner Lutz questioned the potential impact of reallocating land that was originally designated for job creation.
Acting Director of Community Development Scudero acknowledged that repurposing the land would result in the loss of sites designated for business park/light industrial; however, he emphasized that when viewed within the broader context of the eastern waterfront employment focus area, the property in question could be seen as transitional. He noted that the primary consideration for the Commission was whether they supported the proposed change in land use.
He further noted that while the property could potentially be used for a lower intensity business park, it was uncertain if there was a market demand for such a development in that location. He noted that there were entitled business park uses that had not yet been developed in this area.
D10
Planning Commission
Regular Meeting
February 21, 2024 Page 11 of 13
In response to Commissioner Lutz, Mr. Sanson explained that the Yellow Roof Foundation homes were clustered together for ease of maintenance and to facilitate a supportive community environment.
Commissioner Lutz requested that side yard setbacks and park space be increased while also advocating for a decrease in density. Additionally, he expressed concern about the lack of amenities in the area.
Commissioner Riley expressed concern about the insufficient park space, amenities, and third spaces in the area. He proposed extending the park space by eliminating homes on lots 35 and
36. He voiced support for rezoning the property, emphasizing its adjacency to an existing residential neighborhood and the decreasing need for business parks. He spoke favorably of the Yellow Roof Foundation and the project, suggesting that they could serve as a positive example for other developers.
Commissioner Martin expressed concern regarding the removal of grapevines on the property; however, he acknowledged the necessity for housing development, especially considering the areas limited suitability for industrial use due to factors such as accessibility challenges and the presence of high-tension power lines. He also highlighted the property's unique shape and its adjacency to other residential areas. He encouraged the developer to disclose the presence of high-tension power lines, emphasizing the importance of transparency regarding potential interference they could cause. He voiced support for the affordable housing component proposed by the Yellow Roof Foundation. He requested the widening of alley E and L to accommodate sidewalks on both sides of the street.
Mr. Sanson clarified that the alleys were designed to serve as vehicular pass-through access to garages. He expressed willingness to explore potential modifications to the plan.
Commissioner Martin requested sideyard setbacks be increased to a minimum of 5 yards and spoke in support of the suggestion to increase park space by removing lots 35 and 36. He expressed a preference for a 20-foot front yard setback; however, he indicated a willingness to support increasing open space if this item remained unchanged.
In response to Commissioner Martin, Mr. Sanson stated they would be fronting costs associated with extending Vineyard Drive. He stated their intention was for everything north of the PG&E parcel to be privately owned and maintained through a future HOA; however, they were in discussions with PG&E to acquire an easement right-of-way or fee simple for the portion of the road extending through their parcel. He noted they would engage with city staff to determine the logistics and maintenance boundaries between public right-of-way and private ownership.
Commissioner Martin recommended the installation of a sound wall or other sound protection measures along the north side of the development, particularly along the railroad tracks.
Mr. Sanson stated that they would be conducting an acoustic study which would provide recommendations for the installation of a sound wall and sound attenuation measures.
D11
Planning Commission
Regular Meeting
February 21, 2024 Page 12 of 13
Commissioner Martin supported the engineering requirements outlined in the staff report and the Objective Design Standards. He encouraged the developer to consider incorporating native and keystone species into their landscape plan.
Mr. Sanson affirmed that the development team was willing to accommodate the requests regarding native and keystone species wherever possible.
Chairperson Gutilla expressed concern about the potential presence of toxins on the site from pesticides used in old growth vineyards. She cautioned developers against exploiting disadvantaged individuals by placing them in environmentally compromised areas. She noted that the combination of small lots, narrow streets, and a lack of sidewalks could contribute to miniaturizing the neighborhood; therefore, she agreed with the engineering recommendations for sidewalks on both sides of the street. She suggested that the architecture of the Yellow Roof homes match the architecture of the remainder of the development.
In response to Chairperson Gutilla, Mr. Sanson clarified that the intent of the ADU program was for each unit to be separate. He explained that they were in the process of developing the floor plan for the Yellow Roof program, but each unit would be built independently and have a one car garage with its own point of entry.
Chairperson Gutilla requested side yards for both Yellow Roof units be a minimum of 5-feet.
Additionally, she stated that while there may be concerns regarding the jobs/housing imbalance, she considered this specific parcel to be an appropriate site for residential development. She suggested that if all the homes in the adjacent neighborhood to the west were single-story, she would prefer the homes on that side of the development to also be single-story.
Mr. Sanson responded that they would investigate that issue and commented that many of the lots in question were located far away from the property line.
Chairperson Gutilla expressed her support for the use of native plant species and the Yellow Roof Foundation proposal. She suggested the developer consider whether the turnaround area was large enough to accommodate people who might accidentally enter the project.
Commissioner Riley expressed his preference for sidewalks on both sides of the streets; however, he felt that the alleyways could be an exception to this preference.
Chairperson Gutilla stated she supported the suggestion for increasing park space by expanding the park into lots 35 and 36.
In response to Commissioner Jones, Mr. Sanson clarified that both the single-family home and the ADU would serve as affordable housing units, resulting in a total of 12 affordable housing units within the development.
Chairperson Gutilla closed the Commission comment period. She thanked the applicant for presenting their project and wished them luck moving forward.
D12
Planning Commission
Regular Meeting
February 21, 2024 Page 13 of 13
7. REGULAR ITEM
7-1. TRANSPLAN Committee Discussion
Consensus of the Planning Commission agreed to table Regular Item #7-1.
On motion by Commissioner Riley, seconded by Commissioner Jones the Planning Commission members present unanimously tabled Regular Item 7-1. The motion carried the following vote:
AYES: Jones, Lutz, Martin, Riley, Gutilla
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Hills
8. ORAL/WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
Acting Director of Community Development Scudero reported that the City Council had added a discussion on the City’s native landscaping to their 90-day future agenda item list.
9. COMMITTEE REPORTS - None
10. NEXT MEETING: March 20, 2024 / March 6, 2024, meeting is canceled.
Chairperson Gutilla announced the March 6, 2024, Planning Commission meeting was canceled and the next meeting would be held on March 20, 2024.
11. ADJOURNMENT
On motion by Commissioner Martin, seconded by Commissioner Riley, the Planning Commission members present unanimously adjourned the meeting at 10:51 P.M. The motion carried the following vote:
AYES: Jones, Lutz, Martin, Riley, Gutilla
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Hills
Kitty Eiden
KITTY EIDEN, Minutes Clerk
D13
PRELIMINARY
LANDSCAPE PLAN
PRELIMINARY ELEVATIONS
QUESTIONS? COMMENTS
Agenda Item #
STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE
: Regular Meeting of April 9, 2024
TO: H
onorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
SUBM
ITTED BY: Dawn Merchant, Finance Director
APPR
OVED BY: Kwame P. Reed, Acting City Manager
SUBJ
ECT: Sales Tax Citizens’ Oversight Committee Appointment for the vacancy expiring March 2026
RECOMMENDED ACTION
1) It is recommended that the Mayor nominate the candidate for appointment. 2) It
is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution appointing the Mayor’s appointment of Sanjog Sooch to the Sales Tax Citizens’ Oversight Committee for the partial-term vacancy expiring March 2026.
FI
SCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact as all positions are voluntary.
DIS
CUSSION
The Sales Tax Citizens’ Oversight Committee (Committee) is responsible for reviewing the receipt and expenditure of funds under Measure W as they relate to the Council’s stated priorities outlined in the adopted budgets of the City. The Committee is responsible for reporting out the result of their review by April 1st of each year at a public meeting.
The C
ommittee consists of seven members who are Antioch residents. The terms of the Committee members are staggered with four members serving a 4- year term and 3 members serving a 2- year term. At least one member of the Committee shall have a financial, accounting or auditing background.
In g
eneral law cities where the office of mayor is an elective office pursuant to Article 5 (commencing with Section 34900) of Chapter 7 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 4, the mayor, with the approval of the city council, shall make all appointments to boards, commissions, and committees, unless otherwise specifically provided by statute. Under Antioch Municipal Code §2 -5.201, the Mayor shall nominate candidates for membership on all boards and commissions. Nominees shall be appointed to each board and commission upon receiving approval of at least a majority vote of the City Council. 8 Antioch City Council Report
April 9, 2024 Agenda Item #8 2
Currently, there are four vacancies on the Sales Tax Citizens’ Oversight Committee :
three (3) partial-term positions expiring March 2026 and one (1) full-term expiring March 2028. The City Clerk’s Office advertised to fill the vacancies in the usual manner with an extended application deadline of March 1, 2024, at 5:00 p.m. The applicant w as interviewed by Mayor Lamar A. Hernandez-Thorpe and Finance Director Dawn Merchant.
Mayor Hernandez-Thorpe is nominating Sanjog Sooch for the partial term expiring March 2026.
The biography and background of the candidate will be presented at the City Council meeting.
ATTACHMENTS
A. Resolution for one (1) partial-term vacancy expiring March 2026 B. Application
ATTACHMENT A
RESOLUTION NO. 2024/**
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANTIOCH
APPOINTING [INSERT NAME OF APPOINTEE AFTER APPOINTMENT] TO THE SALES TAX CITIZENS’ OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE FOR ONE (1) PARTIAL-TERM VACANCY ENDING MARCH 2026
WHEREAS, there are currently four (4) vacancies on the Sales Tax Citizens’ Oversight Committee;
WHEREAS, the City Clerk’s Office announced vacancies and accepted applications for these vacancies;
W
HEREAS, Mayor Lamar A. Hernandez-Thorpe considered the application received and interviewed the interested applicant;
WHEREAS, Antioch Municipal Code Section 2-5.201 requires the Mayor to nominate candidates for membership on all boards and commissions and requires nominees to receive approval of at least a majority vote of the City Council to be appointed t
o a board or commission; and
WHEREAS, Mayor Lamar A. Hernandez-Thorpe has nominated [insert name of appointee after appointment] to the Sales Tax Citizens’ Oversight Committee, partial-term vacancy ending March 2026.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Antioch hereby approves the Mayor’s appointment of [insert name of appointee after appointment] to serve on the Sales Tax Citizens’ Oversight Committee for the partial-term vacancy, ending in March 2026.
* * * * * * * *
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Antioch at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 9th day of April 2024, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
___________________________________
ELIZABETH HOUSEHOLDER
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANTIOCH
Agenda Item #
STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: R
egular Meeting of April 9, 2024
TO: Honor
able Mayor and Members of the City Council
SUBMI
TTED BY: Brad Helfenberger, Parks and Recreation Director APPRO
VED BY: Kwame P. Reed, Acting City Manager
SUBJE
CT: Parks and Recreation Commission Appointments for Three (3) Vacancies Expiring March 2028
RECOMMENDED ACTION
1) It is recommended that the Mayor nominate the candidates for appointments. 2) It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution approving the Mayor’s appointment of Dominique King to the Parks and Recreation Commission for a full- term, expiring March 2028.
3) It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution approving the Mayor ’s appointment of Daynon Matthews to the Parks and Recreation Commission for a full-term, expiring March 2028.
4) It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution approving the Mayor ’s appointment of La Shan Hunt to the Parks and Recreation Commission for a full - term, expiring March 2028.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact as all positions are voluntary.
DISCUS
SION
The Parks and Recreation Commission has three full -term vacancies for appointments that expire in March 2028. Applications were received during the recruitment period and the applicants were interviewed by Mayor Hernandez-Thorpe.
Mayo
r Hernandez-Thorpe is nominating Dominique King, Daynon Matthews, and La Shan Hunt to fill vacancies expiring March 2028. The biography and background of the candidates will be presented at the City Council meeting.
ATTACHM
ENT
A. Resolution
B. Applications
9 ATTACHMENT A
RESOLUTION NO. 2024/**
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANTIOCH
APPOINTING [INSERT NAME OF APPOINTEE AFTER APPOINTMENT] TO THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION FOR ONE (1) FULL TERM VACANCY ENDING MARCH 2028
WHEREAS, there are currently three (3) vacancies on the Parks and Recreation Commission;
WHEREAS, the City Clerk made announcement of the vacancies and solicited applications for the vacancies;
WHEREAS, Mayor Lamar A. Hernandez-Thorpe considered applications received and interviewed each of the interested applicants;
WHEREAS, Antioch Municipal Code Section 2- 5.201 requires that the Mayor nominate candidates for membership on all boards and commissions and requires that the City Council approve, by a majority vote, the appointment of said nominees;
WHEREAS, Mayor Lamar A. Hernandez -Thorpe has nominated [insert name of appointee after appointment] to be appointed to the Parks and Recreation Commission for a full term that expires in March 2028.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Antioch hereby approves the Mayor’s appointment of [insert name of appointee after appointment] to serve on the Parks and Recreation Commission for a full term ending in March 2028.
* * * * * * * *
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Antioch at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 9 th day of April 2024, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
___________________________________
ELIZABETH HOUSEHOLDER
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANTIOCH
10 Agenda Item #
STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: Regular Meeting of April 9, 2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
SUBMITTED BY: Kwame P. Reed, Acting City Manager/Economic Development Director
SUBJECT: Restructuring of the Economic Development Commission Ad Hoc Committee – Dissolution or Extension Until a Specific Date
RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council dissolve the Restructuring of the Economic Development Commission Ad Hoc Committee.
FISCAL IMPACT
The recommended action has no direct fiscal impact at this time.
DISCUSSION
The Restructuring of the Economic Development Commission Ad Hoc Committee (“Committee”) was established by Resolution 2023-66 at the April 25, 2023 City Council meeting. The Committee was created to work with the City Manager, Economic Development Director, the existing members of the Economic Development Commission, and the CEO of the Antioch Chamber of Commerce on restructuring the Economic Development Commission (“EDC”). The Committee would provide a recommendation to the City Council that is based on the economic development goals and priorities of the City Council including but not limited to the findings and initiatives within the adopted “Reinvest Antioch” Economic Development Program.
At the October 10, 2023, City Council meeting, the City Council approved a six (6)-month extension to the Committee that expires on April 25, 2024. The Councilmembers on the Committee recently met with staff and are making the recommendation to dissolve the Committee until substantial work has commenced towards the comprehensive update to the General Plan.
ATTACHMENTS
None.