Agenda packet, regular meeting, third session — Antioch City Council, August 11, 2026 (part 1 of 2)

ANNOTATED AGENDA
Antioch City Council

REGULAR MEETING

Date: Tuesday, August 11, 2026
Time: 4:30 P.M. – Closed Session
7:00 P.M. – Regular Meeting
Place: Council Chambers
200 ‘H’ Street
Antioch, CA 94509
Council Member Tamisha Torres-Walker will attend remote via ZOOM Chaminade Resort & Spa, (Seascape Room) 1 Chaminade Ln, Santa Cruz, CA 95065 City Council meetings are televised live on Comcast channel 24, AT&T U-verse channel 99, or live stream (at www.antiochca.gov). Please see the inside cover for detailed Speaker Rules.

PLEASE TURN OFF CELL PHONES BEFORE ENTERING COUNCIL CHAMBERS.

Ron Bernal, Mayor Michael J. Mandy City Clerk
Donald P. Freitas, Mayor Pro Tem (District 3) Jorge R. Rojas, City Treasurer Tamisha Torres-Walker, Council Member District 1
Louie Rocha, Council Member District 2 Ana Cortez, Acting City Manager Monica E. Wilson, Council Member District 4 Lori M. Asuncion, City Attorney

ACCESSIBILITY: In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and California law, it is the policy of the City of Antioch to offer its public programs, services and meetings in a manner that is readily accessible to everyone, including individuals with disabiliti es. If you are a person with a disability and require information or materials in an appropriate alternative format; or if you require any other accommodation, please contact the ADA Coordinator at the number or address below at least 72 hours prior to the meeting or when you desire to receive services. Advance notification within this guideline will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. The City’s ADA Coordinator can be reached @ Phone: (925) 779-7009, and e-mail: [email protected].

ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL -1- AUGUST 11, 2026

SPEAKER RULES
Welcome to a meeting of the Antioch City Council. Your attendance is appreciated. The State Ralph M. Brown Act guarantees the public's right to address the City Council, within the framework of Speaker Rules. Because agendas encompass many business items, Speaker Rules enable the meeting to be efficiently conducted and concluded at a reasonable hour.

The City Council can only take action on items that are listed on the agenda. If you wish to speak about an item not on the agenda , the "Public Comments" section of the agenda is for you.

Unagendized comments are provided until no later than 7:30 p.m. when the City Council moves on to agenda items. There is another opportunity for public comments at the end of the meeting for those persons unable to provide comment earlier on the agenda.

If you wish to speak, either during "public comments" or during an agenda item, fill out a Speaker Request form, located at the entrance of the Council Chambers or notify the clerk. If using the speaker form, please place the Speaker Request form in the tray near the City Clerk before the Council Meeting begins. This will enable us to call upon you to speak. Important: The Speaker Request form is retained as a Public Record, and as such, may be shared with others upon request in line with the California Public Records Act. On your Speaker Request form, please identify if the comment is for “Announcement of Community Events”, “Public Comment”, or a specific “Agenda Item”. No one may speak more than once on an agenda item or during "public comments." Speakers will be notified shortly before they are called to speak. When you are called to speak, please limit your comments to the time allotted (up to 3 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor). Speakers attending remotely shall wait with their microphones muted until it is their time for comment. When it is a remote speaker’s turn for public comment, the speaker will be instructed to unmute their microphone by the City Clerk. Failure by the sp eaker to unmute their microphone in a timely fashion or if the City Council is unable to hear their speaker’s comment for any reason shall result in the speaker being passed over for that item.

Speakers addressing the Council shall not make personal, impertinent, unduly repetitive, slanderous or profane remarks to the Council, any member of the Council, City staff or the general public, nor utter loud, threatening, personal or abusive language, n or engage in any other conduct that disrupts, disturbs or otherwise unreasonably impedes the orderly conduct of the Council meeting. Any person who makes such remarks, who utters loud, threatening, personal or abusive language, who is unduly repetitious or engages in extended discussion of irrelevancies, or who engages in any disorderly conduct that disrupts, disturbs or otherwise unreasonably impedes the orderly conduct of any Council meeting shall, at the discretion of the presiding officer or a majority of the Council, be denied the right to speak and escorted from the chambers for the remainder of the meeting. In the event the person is attending the meeting remotely, the person may be muted or expelled from the remote meeting and shall not be allowed to participate again remotely during that meeting.

When a person breaches the rules outlined above, the presiding officer shall request that a person who is breaching the rules be orderly and silent. If, after receiving a warning from the presiding officer, a person persists in disturbing the meeting, the presiding officer shall order him or her to leave the Council meeting. If such person does not remove himself or herself, the presiding officer may order any law enforcement officer who is on duty at the meeting to remove that person from the Council Chambers. In the event the person is attending the meeting remotely, the person may be muted or expelled from the remote meeting.

ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL -2- AUGUST 11, 2026

The "Consent Calendar" is a group of items which are determined to be routine. These items are usually considered all at once and approved without further discussion. If you are opposed to action which is recommended for an item on the "Consent Calendar," please submit a Speaker Request form before the meeting, and place in the Speaker Card tray near the City Clerk. This will enable the item to be removed from the “Consent Calendar” and call on you to speak.

During Public Hearings, each side is entitled to one "main presenter" who may not speak for more than 10 minutes; all other speakers during public hearing items, are entitled to a maximum of 5 minutes.

These time limits may be modified depending on the number of speakers or number of items on the agenda at the Mayor’s discretion. Groups who are here regarding an item may identify themselves by raising their hands at the appropriate time to show support for one of their speakers. During certain types of hearings, the applicant is allowed to give their presentation first. After all testimony is received, the applicant has an opportunity for rebuttal.

After hearing from the public, the agenda item will be closed. Deliberations will then be limited to members of the City Council.

If the meeting appears to be going late, the City Council may decide to continue some items to a subsequent meeting. The City Council will try to make this determination around 10:45 p.m. It is the goal to stop discussing agenda items no later than 11:00 p.m.

NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY TO ADDRESS COUNCIL

The public has the opportunity to address the City Council on each agenda item. No one may speak more than once on an agenda item or during “Public Comments”.

Members of the public wishing to provide public comments, may do so in one of the following ways (#2 pertains to the Zoom Webinar Platform):

IN PERSON – Fill out a Speaker Request Form, available near the entrance doors, and place in the Speaker Card Tray near the City Clerk before the City Council Meeting begins.

VIRTUAL – To provide oral public comments during the meeting, please click the following link to access the meeting via Zoom Webinar:

https://antiochca.zoom.us/j/85331467540?pwd=FBgvevB5PJqaMItpDMQhf9pNjqFNb0.1

Meeting ID: 853 3146 7540
Passcode: 167974
Dial-In Number: +1 (669) 444-9171

You will be asked to enter a name. When the Mayor announces public comments, click the "raise hand" feature in Zoom.

When calling into the meeting using the Zoom Webinar telephone number, press *9 on your telephone keypad to “raise your hand”. Please ensure your Zoom client is updated so staff can enable your microphone when it is your turn to speak. Speakers will be notified shortly before they are called to speak.

When you are called to speak, please limit your comments to the time allotted. The City cannot guarantee that its network and/or the site will be uninterrupted.

ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL -3- AUGUST 11, 2026

WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENT – If you wish to provide a written public comment, you may email the City Clerk’s Department at [email protected], by 3:00 p.m. the day of the City Council Meeting.

PLEASE NOTE: Written public comments received by 3:00 p.m. the day of the City Council Meeting will be shared with the City Council before the meeting; entered into the public record; retained on file by the City Clerk’s Office; and available to the public upon request. Written public comments will not be read during the City Council Meeting

Notice of Availability of Reports
This agenda is a summary of the actions proposed to be taken by the City Council. For almost every agenda item, materials have been prepared by the City staff for the Council's consideration. These materials include staff reports which explain in detail the item before the Council and the reason for the recommendation. The materials may also include resolutions or ordinances which are proposed to be adopted. Unless otherwise noted, City Council actions include a determination that the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply. The Council meets regularly on the second and fourth Tuesdays of the month at 7:00 p.m., with Closed Sessions often occurring before or after the regular meeting. City Council Agendas, including Staff Reports are posted onto our City’s Website 72 hours before each Council Meeting. To be notified when the agenda packets are posted onto our City’s Website, simply click on this link: www.antiochca.gov/list.aspx and enter your e-mail address to subscribe. To view the agenda information, click on the following link: www.antiochca.gov/AgendaCenter. Questions may be directed to the staff member who prepared the staff report, or to the City Clerk's Office, who will refer you to the appropriate person.

4:31 P.M. ROLL CALL – CLOSED SESSION – for Council Members – Council Members District 2 Rocha, District 4 Wilson, Mayor Pro Tem (District 3) Freitas, and Mayor Bernal [District 1 Torres-Walker – Absent]

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

PUBLIC COMMENTS for Closed Session

CLOSED SESSION:

1. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION – Pursuant to Government Code Sections 54957(b)(1) and 54954.5(e). Position to be Reviewed: City Attorney.

2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(e)(2): Number of potential cases: (9). The City is in receipt of information concerning facts and circumstances that might result in litigation against the City which are known to a potential plaintiff or plaintiffs pertaining to possible Labor Code Section 1102.5, and Fair Employment and Housing Act violations.

3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(e)(2): Number of potential cases: (1). The City is in receipt of information concerning facts and circumstances that might result in litigation against the City which are known to a potential plaintiff or plaintiffs for a potential breach of contract and related claims.

ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL -4- AUGUST 11, 2026

4:32 P.M. MOTIONED TO ADJOURN TO CLOSED SSESSION

7:24 P.M. ROLL CALL – REGULAR MEETING – for City /City Council Members acting as Successor Agency/Housing Successor to the Antioch Development Agency Council Members District 2 Rocha, D istrict 4 Wilson,
Mayor Pro Tem (District 3) Freitas, and Mayor Bernal
[District 1 Torres-Walker – Absent]

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

CITY ATTORNEY TO REPORT OUT ON CLOSED SESSION – No reportable action.

PUBLIC COMMENTS – Members of the public may comment only on unagendized items.

The public may comment on agendized items when they come up on this Agenda.

7:27 P.M. DISTRICT 1 COUNCIL MEMBER, TORRES-WALKER JOINED REMOTELY.

1. PROCLAMATION

• Overdose Awareness Day
Approved, 4/0
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council approve the proclamation.

2. ANNOUNCEMENTS OF CIVIC AND COMMUNITY EVENTS

• Anthony Anderson Community Member
o Tech In Action 2027, March 27, 2027, Concord Hilton. 8:30 a.m. – 5:00 p.m.

• Ribbon Cutting Ceremony, Jacobson Park, Antioch – August 21, 2026, 4:30 p.m.

3. ANNOUNCEMENTS OF BOARD AND COMMISSION OPENINGS

➢ BOARD OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS

➢ SALES TAX CITIZENS’ OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE

CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS/COMMUNICATIONS

MAYOR’S COMMENTS

STAFF REPORT

ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL -5- AUGUST 11, 2026

4. PRESENTATION - Presentation on the Contra Costa Mosquito and Vector Control by Nola Woods, Public Affairs Director

5. CONSENT CALENDAR for City /City Council Members acting as Successor Agency/Housing Successor to the Antioch Development Agency

MAYOR PRO TEM FREITAS MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE ALL CONSENT CALENDAR I TEMS, EXCEPT ITEMS #G, #H, AND #F. COUNCIL MEMBER ROCHA SECONDED THE MOTION, APPROVED 5/0.

A. APPROVAL OF SPECI AL JOINT MEETING MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND ANTIOCH POLICE OVERSIGHT COMMISSION FOR JUNE 15, 2026
Approved, 5/0
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council approve the Special Joint Meeting Minutes.

B. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR JULY 28, 2026 Continued, 5/0
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council continue the Meeting Minutes.

C. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL WARRANTS
Approved, 5/0
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council approve the warrants.

D. APPROVAL OF HOUSING SUCCESSOR WARRANTS
Approved, 5/0
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council approve the warrants.

E. REJECTION OF CLAIMS: KYLE SMITH, ANA DE MORENO, and JOSHUA NORRIS

Rejected, 5/0
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council reject the claims submitted by Kyle Smith, Ana De Moreno and Joshua Norris.

ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL -6- AUGUST 11, 2026

CONSENT CALENDAR for City /City Council Members acting as Successor Agency/Housing Successor to the Antioch Development Agency – Continued

F. RESOLUTION APPROVING VERKADA INC., POLICE DEPARTMENT CAMERAS

COUNCIL MEMBER ROCHA MADE A MOTION TO ADOPT THE RESO LUTION APPROVING VERKADA INC., POLICE DEPARTMENT CAMERAS , THE MOTION WAS SECONDED BY MAYOR PRO TEM FREITAS, APPROVED 5/0.

Reso No.2026/116 Adopted, 5/0
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution:

1) Approving a five-year agreement with Verkada/Development Group Inc. in the amount of $381,676.22 to purchase police department cameras, hardware and cloud -based operating system software for a five -year period from September 1, 2026, to September 1, 2031; and
2) Authorizing a fiscal year 2026 -27 budget amendment to roll over the FY 2025-26 Police Department General Fund
budget to the FY 26/27 budget; and
3) Authorizing the Acting City Manager to execute an
agreement with Verkada/DGI not to exceed $381,676.22
over the five-year period; and
4) Authorizing the Acting City Manager to take any and all necessary and appropriate actions to carry out the purpose and intent of the resolution.

G. APPROVAL OF A THIRD AMENDMENT TO TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORK

LICENSE AND ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANTIOCH

AND CROWN CASTLE FIBER LLC

MAYOR PRO TEM FREITAS MADE A MOTION TO ADOPT THE RESO LUTION

APPROVING THE THIRD AMENDMENT, THE MOTION WAS SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER ROCHA, APPROVED 5/0.

Reso No.2026/117 Adopted, 5/0
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution:

1) Authorizing the Acting City Manager to execute a third amendment to Telecommunication Network License and
Encroachment Agreement between the City of Antioch and
Crown Castle Fiber LLC to authorize modifications to
previously approved wireless facilities in the public rights-of- way; and

ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL -7- AUGUST 11, 2026

CONSENT CALENDAR for City /City Council Members acting as Successor Agency/Housing Successor to the Antioch Development Agency – Continued

2) Authorizing the Acting City Manager to take any and all necessary and appropriate steps to carry out the purpose and intent of the resolution.

H. CONSIDERATION OF BIDS FOR THE INSTALLATION OF PARK SIGNAGE; P.W. 679-3

ACTING CITY MANAGER DAWN MERCHANT MADE A MOTION TO PULL ITEM #H AND MOVE TO THE SEPTEMBER 8TH MEETING.

Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution:

1) Rejecting the bid submitted by Greentech Industry, Inc., as nonresponsive;

2) Awarding the construction agreement to the lowest,
responsive, and responsible bidder, Monarka Development Corporation DBA Express Sign & Neon in the amount of
$498,860, with a $25,000 contingency for a total contract amount of $ 523,860 for the Installation of Park Signage Project;
3) Approving a budget amendment to the Fiscal Year 2026/27 Capital Improvement and Operating Budgets utilizing Park - in-Lieu funds in the amount of $187,000; and

4) Authorizing the Acting City Manager or designee to take any and all necessary and appropriate steps to carry out the purpose and intent of the resolution including the execution of the construction agreement in a form approved by the City Attorney.

ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL -8- AUGUST 11, 2026

COUNCIL REGULAR AGENDA

6. SALES TAX CITIZENS’ OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT FOR A FULL -TERM VACANCY EXPIRING MARCH 2030

MAYOR PRO TEM FREITAS MADE A MOTION TO NOMINATE A CANDIDATE FOR APPOINTMENT TO THE SALES TAX CITIZENS ’ OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE , THE MOTION WAS SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER ROCHA, APPROVED 5/0.

Reso No.2026/118 Adopted, 5/0
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the Mayor:

1) Nominate the candidate for appointment and the City Council adopt a resolution approving the Mayor’s appointment of Christian Lapena to the Sales Tax Citizens’ Oversight
Committee for a full-term vacancy expiring March 2030.

7. DESIGNATION OF A VOTING DELEGATE AND ALTERNATE DELEGATE FOR THE

LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE AND AUTHORIZATION FOR ASSOCIATED CONFERENCE EXPENSES NOT TO EXCEED $2,600 PER PARTICIPANT

MAYOR PRO TEM FREITAS MADE A MOTION TO APPOINT A VOTING DELEGATE

AND ALTERNATE DELEGATE FOR THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES AND AUTHORIZE ASSOCIATED CONFERENCE EXPENSES NOT TO EXCEED $2600 PER

PARTICIPANT, THE MOTION WAS SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER TORRES- WALKER, APPROVED 5/0.

Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council:

1) Appoint a Voting Delegate and Alternate Delegate for the 2026 League of California Cities Annual Conference and;

2) Authorize the associated conference expenses for one participant in an amount not to exceed $2,600.

ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL -9- AUGUST 11, 2026

COUNCIL REGULAR AGENDA - Continued

8. CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSION ITEM: SELECTION OF POTENTIAL PARK LOCATION FOR UPCOMING AVAILABLE GRANT FUNDING THROUGH PROPOSITION 4

AFTER COUNCIL RECEIVED THE STAFF PRESENTATION , MAYOR P RO TEM FREITAS MADE A MOTION TO EXTEND THE MEETING TO 11:30 P.M., THE MOTION WAS SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER ROCHA, APPROVED, 5/0

MAYOR PRO TEM FREITAS MADE A MOTION SELECT CITY PARK AS THE PARK

LOCATION FOR UPCOMING AVAILABLE GRANT FUNDING , THE MOTION WAS SECONDED BY MAYOR BERNAL, APPROVED 4/1. (AYES: Council Members Torres- Walker, Wilson, Mayor Pro Tem Freitas and Mayor Bernal, NOES: Council Member Rocha)

Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council:

1) Discuss the proposed park site options and provide direction to staff regarding the location that best aligns with the grant program requirements and project objectives.

11:11 P.M. RECESS
11:20 P.M. RECONVENED, ROLL CALL – Council Members District 1 Torres -Walker, District 2 Rocha, District 4 Wilson, Mayor Pro Tem (District 3)
Freitas, and Mayor Bernal

AFTER COUNCIL RECEIVED PUBLIC COMMENTS, COUNCIL MEMBER ROCHA MADE A MOTION TO EXTEND THE MEETING TO 12:00 A.M., THE MOTION WAS SECONDED BY MAYOR PRO TEM FREITAS, APPROVED, 5/0

9. DOWNTOWN SECURITY SERVICES DISCUSSION

AFTER COUNCIL RECEIVED PUBLIC COMMENTS, MAYOR PRO TEM FREITAS MADE A MOTION TO EXTEND THE MEETING TO 12:10 A.M., THE MOTION WAS SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER ROCHA, APPROVED, 5/0

Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council:

1) Discuss Downtown Security Services and provide directions to staff on how to proceed.

ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL -10- AUGUST 11, 2026

COUNCIL REGULAR AGENDA - Continued

PUBLIC COMMENTS

STAFF COMMUNICATIONS

COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS – Council Members report out various activities and any Council Member may place an item for discussion and direction on a future agenda. Timing determined by Mayor and City Manager – no longer than 90 days.

MOTION TO ADJOURN – After Council Communications and Future Agenda Items, the Mayor will make a motion to adjourn the meeting. A second motion is required, and then a majority vote is required to adjourn the meeting.

Motioned to adjourn the meeting at 12:07 a.m., Approved, 5/0

NATIONAL OVERDOSE AWARENESS DAY
AUGUST 31, 2026

WHEREAS, National Overdose Awareness Day is observed annually on August 31 to remember those who have lost their lives to drug overdose, support grieving families and loved ones, and raise awareness that overdose is preventable;

WHEREAS, overdose continues to affect communities across the nation, including the City of Antioch and Contra Costa County, with historically underserved communities often experiencing disproportionate impacts, underscoring the need for prevention, education, equitable access to treatment and recovery services, and compassionate community support;

WHEREAS, naloxone is a safe, effective, and life-saving medication that can reverse an opioid overdose, and increasing public awareness, education, and access can help save lives while connecting individuals to treatment and recovery services;

WHEREAS, the City of Antioch is committed to addressing the overdose crisis through community partnerships and strategic investments of California Opioid Settlement Funds to expand access to medication-assisted treatment, patient navigation, recovery support services, and overdose prevention initiatives; and

WHEREAS, National Overdose Awareness Day provides an opportunity for the Antioch community to reduce the stigma surrounding substance use disorder, honor those working in prevention, treatment, and recovery, and reaffirm our shared commitment to building a healthier, safer, and more compassionate community.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, RON BERNAL, Mayor of the City of Antioch, hereby proclaim August 31, 2026, as “National Overdose Awareness Day" in the City of Antioch and encourage all residents to recognize this day by honoring those we have lost, supporting individuals and families affected by substance use disorder, and working together to prevent overdose and save lives.

AUGUST 11, 2026

_______________________
RON BERNAL, Mayor

\
___ 1____
08-11-26

BOARD / COMMISSION / COMMITTEE

VACANCY ANNOUNCEMENTS
Phone: (925) 779-7009 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 200 H Street/P.O. Box 5007 [email protected] Antioch, CA. 94531-5007
hhttps://bit.ly/COA-BC233 AntiochIsOpportunity.com
The City of Antioch encourages residents to become involved in their local community. One way to do so is to serve on one of the various Boards, Commissions, and Committees. Any interested resident is invited to apply for the following vacanciesby5:00 p.m., Friday, $XJXVW, 2026. ¾ BOARD OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS
Three(3) Full-Term Vacancies, expiringMarch 2030
One (1) Alternate Vacancy, Two-YearTerm
¾ SALES TAX CITIZENS’ OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE
7KUHH() Full-TermVacancies, expiring March 20
7ZR

)XOO7HUP9DFDQFLHVH[SLULQJ0DUFK
To be considered for the vacancy position(s), please complete an application and submit it to the City Clerk’s Office by the deadline date listed above. Applications are located on the City’s Website: www.antiochca.gov and may be picked up in person at Antioch City Hall, 200 H Street, Antioch, CA.

Please email your completed application to:[email protected]. You can also drop off your application (Attn: City Clerk) in the water billing drop-off box located in the parking lot just outside of Antioch City Hall.

Your interest and desire to serve our community can make a difference.

BOARD OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS
7KUHH ())XOO7HUP VacancLHV, expiring March 20
One (1) AltHUQDWH Vacancy, 2-year term
'eadline Date: Ey 5:00 p.m., $XJXVW
The City of Antioch encourages residents to become involved in their local community.

One way to do so is to serve on various commissions, boards, and committees. Any interested resident is encouraged to apply.

Purpose:

The Board of Administrative Appeals hears appeals regarding administrative decisions by any official of the City dealing with Municipal Code Interpretations.

Board Seats:
x Five (5) Board Members, 4-year terms.
x One (1) Alternate Board Member, 2-year term.

Meetings:
x Held every first Thursday of every month at 3:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers; or on other dates as needed.

Requirements:
x Must be a resident of the City of Antioch.
x Three (3) members shall have experience in building construction trades and/or training in the CA Code of Regulations.
x Board members are required to submit the Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) Form 700 (Statement of Economic Interests) upon assuming office, and every year thereafter.
x Board members are required to complete a 2-hour online AB1234 Ethics course within one year of their appointment.
x Newly appointed and reappointed Members are required to take an Oath of Office administered by the City Clerk.

BOARD OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS
*Required field
7KUHH

)XOO7HUPVacancLHV, expiring March 20
One (1) AltHUQDWH Vacancy, 2-year term
'eadline Date: By 5:00 p.m., $XJXVW
APPLICANT INFORMATION Youth 14-17
*Full Name: Main Phone:
( )
Alternate Phone:
( )
*Residence Address:

Antioch, CA
E-mail Address:

Employer/School: Occupation: Resident since:
*PARENT/GUARDIAN INFORMATION (If applicant is age 14-17 years) *Full Name: Main Phone:
( )
Alternate Phone:
( )
*Residence Address:

Antioch, CA
E-mail Address:
*QUESTIONNAIRE
Please answer the questions below on a separate sheet(s) and attach. Applications without these questions answered will not be considered. Please attach your resume (recommended to enhance your application).

1. List (3) main reasons for your interest in joining the Boards of Administrative Appeals.

2. What skills/experience do you have that would be helpful in serving on this Board?

3. Please provide details of any previous community service performed within the City of Antioch.

4. Please add any other information/comments that would be helpful in reviewing your application. *ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
My signature below indicates my understanding and acknowledgement that:
*This completed application is available for public review (youth applications are exempt). *I have read and agree to the requirements listed on the Vacancy Announcement. *To the best of my ability, I will attend the Board of Administrative Appeals regular meetings every 1st Thursday of the Month, at 3:00 p.m.

Please return completed application by:
x Mail to: Office of the City Clerk
P.O. Box 5007, Antioch CA 94531
x In Person: Antioch City Hall-Clerk’s Office
200 H Street, 3rd Floor
x Email to: [email protected]
___________________________ _________
*Applicant Signature *Date
___________________________ _________
*Parent/Guardian Signature *Date
(An original, signed application with parent/
guardian signature is required, if a minor)

SALES TAX CITIZENS’ OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE
)LYH() )XOO7HUP9DcancLHV, expiring March 20
([WHQGHG'eadline Date: By 5:00 p.m., $XJXVW, 202
The City of Antioch encourages residents to become involved in their local community. One way to do so is to serve on various commissions, boards, and committees. Any interested resident is encouraged to apply.

Purpose:

The Sales Tax Citizens’ Oversight Committee shall review the expenditures and report publicly how the funds are being used to address the City Council’s stated priorities of maintaining Antioch’s fiscal stability, police patrols, 911 emergency response, youth violence prevention programs; ensuring water quality/safety; repairing streets; cleaning up parks/illegal dumping; restoring youth afterschool/summer programs; and other essential services. Each year, an independent auditor shall complete a public audit report of the revenue raised and its expenditure. The Committee’s review shall be completed in conjunction with the City’s budget process. The Committee’s report on its review, whether oral or written, shall be considered by the City Council at a public meeting before April 1 of each year. Any written report shall be a matter of public record.

Committee Seats:
x Seven (7) Members, 4-year terms.

Meetings:
x The Committee shall meet at least twice a year.

Requirements:
x Must be a resident of the City of Antioch.
x At least one member of the Committee shall have a financial, accounting or auditing background.
x Commissioners are required to submit the Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) Form 700 (Statement of Economic Interests) upon assuming office, and every year thereafter.
x Commissioners are required to complete a 2-hour online AB1234 Ethics course within one year of their appointment.
x Newly appointed and reappointed Members are required to take an Oath of Office administered by the City Clerk.

To be considered for these volunteer position(s), a completed application must be emailed to:
[email protected], or mailed/delivered to the Office of the City Clerk, by the deadline date listed above. Applications a UH DYDLODEOH E\ HPDLOLQJ WKH &LW\ &OHUN¶V RIILFH3ULQWHG DSSOLFDWLRQVDUHDOVRDYDLODEOHDW$QWLRFK&LW\+DOO+6WUHHW$QWLRFK&$ Community Service Application for:
*Required field
SALES TAX CITIZENS’ OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE
7KUHH() )XOO7HUP9acancLHV, expiring March 20
7ZR

)XOO7HUP9DFDQFLHV([SLULQJ0DUFK
([WHQGHG'eadline Date: By 5:00 p.m., $XJXVW, 202
APPLICANT INFORMATION Youth 14-17
*Full Name: Main Phone:
( )
Alternate Phone:
( )
*Residence Address:

Antioch, CA
E-mail Address:

Employer/School: Occupation: Resident since:
*PARENT/GUARDIAN INFORMATION (If applicant is age 14-17 years) *Full Name: Main Phone:
( )
Alternate Phone:
( )
*Residence Address:

1. List (3) main reasons for your motivation to join the Sales Tax Citizens’ Oversight Committee.

2. Do you have a financial or accounting background? If so, please provide details.

3. What skills/experience do you have that would be helpful in serving on this Committee?

4. Please add any other information/comments that would be helpful in reviewing your application. *ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
My signature below indicates my understanding and acknowledgement that:
*This completed application is available for public review (youth applications are exempt). *I have read and agree to the requirements listed on the Vacancy Announcement. *To the best of my ability, I will attend the Sales Tax Citizens’ Oversight Committee regular meetings which meet at least 2 times annually.

District Services
protecting public health since 1927
Mosquitoes - Mosquitofish
Rats/mice
Skunks
Ticks
Yellowjackets
Bees

Special District
protecting public health since 1927
Funding
Property taxes
Benefit Assessments
No additional charge for county residents to receive a
District service.

District Services
protecting public health since 1927
Number of Service Requests Last 12 Months
Mosquitoes 71
Mosquitofish 8
Rats/mice 42
Skunks 56
Ticks 5
Yellowjackets 9
Bees 7
Invasive New Mosquito
protecting public health since 1927
Invasive Aedes aegypti mosquito found
in Antioch three years in a row.

Invasive New Mosquito
protecting public health since 1927
Invasive Aedes aegypti can transmit Zika,
dengue fever, yellow fever, and
chikungunya viruses to people

Invasive New Mosquito
protecting public health since 1927
Zika, dengue fever, yellow fever and
chikungunya CAN be transmitted from
Person to Person

Invasive New Mosquito
protecting public health since 1927
District Employees Conduct Door-to-Door
Inspections in Antioch

Invasive New Mosquito
protecting public health since 1927
The District’s Laboratory Staff is Trapping
for Mosquitoes

Invasive New Mosquito
protecting public health since 1927
The District’s Integrated Vector
Management Program

Invasive New Mosquito
protecting public health since 1927
Innovative Mosquito Reduction
Pilot Project

Invasive New Mosquito
protecting public health since 1927
Innovative Mosquito Reduction
Pilot Project
• Male mosquitoes CANNOT bite people or animals
• Wolbachia is a naturally occurring bacteria that exists in many mosquitoes and other insects including beetles, dragonflies, bees, butterflies and fruit flies. • When Wolbachia-treated male Aedes aegypti males mate with wild female Aedes aegypti, the female cannot produce living offspring • Wolbachia does not impact people or other animals
Invasive New Mosquito
protecting public health since 1927
Innovative Mosquito Reduction
Pilot Project

How to Request a District Service
protecting public health since 1927
Contact the District
Contra Costa Mosquito and Vector Control District
925-685-9301
www.ContraCostaMosquito.gov

__ _A____
08-11-26

ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL AND ANTIOCH POLICE OVERSIGHT

COMMISSION MINUTES

Special Joint Meeting June 15, 2026 6:30 P.M. Antioch Water Park

CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL

Mayor Bernal called the meeting to order at 6:35 P.M. and Administrative Analyst Gomez called the roll.

Present: Council Member Louie Rocha, Council Member Tamisha Torres-Walker, Council Member Monica Wilson, Mayor Pro Tem Donald P. Frietas, Mayor Ron Bernal, Commissioner Addison Peterson, Commissioner Susan Kennedy, Commissioner Alicia Dianne Lacey-Oha, Vice-Chair Devin William, Chair Porshe Taylor

Tardy: Commissioner Josiah Ben-Oni arrived at 6:43 p.m.

Absent: Commissioner Manuel L. Soliz

Staff: Assistant City Attorney, Kevin Kundinger
Acting City Manager, Ana Cortez
Police Chief, Joseph Vigil
Police Consultant, Manjet Sappal
Administrative Analyst, Monica Gomez
Administrative Analyst, Haneefah Rasheed

Administrative Analyst Gomez confirmed quorum at 6:35 p.m.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

Mayor Bernal led the Pledge of Allegiance.

1. DISCUSSION ITEM: ROLES, RESPONSIBILITIES AND GOALS OF THE ANTIOCH

POLICE OVERSIGHT COMMISSION

Mayor Bernal stated that the first item is the discussion of item roles, responsibilities, and goals of the Antioch Police Oversight Commission (APOC).

A. Presentation by Kevin Kundinger, Assistant City Attorney

APOC
Motioned by Council/Committee Member Chair Taylor to suspend the rules and have Item #1 moved to the next APOC agenda, and to have Item #3 moved up to be second instead of third; seconded by Council/Committee Member Vice-Chair Williams. There were five ayes , one nay, and one absent.

APOC & City Council Minutes
Special Meeting
June 15, 2026 Page 2 of 19

Mayor Bernal stated that council members would not vote on Item #1. There would be separate votes.

CITY COUNCIL
Mayor Bernal stated that they were voting to determine if they would hear the item.

On motioned by Mayor Bernal to remove Item #1 and move Item #3 before Item #2; seconded by Council Member Wilson. There were three ayes and two nays. Motion did not pass.

Mayor Pro Tem Frietas requested clarification of the question that Chair Taylor motioned to have Item #1 to be completely off the agenda. APOC ha s had several discussions, and they had already voted on the dais to have a facilitator hired to do it. It was voted for them to discuss and participate in the RFP process, and they wanted someone who had experience in facilitating the goals and responsibilities of their role. They were not aware that was being discussed that night, especially after they had several discussions on how they wanted to develop their goal planning.

Mayor Pro Tem Frietas stated that this was a joint meeting. It was a general discussion of roles, responsibilities, and goals. He did not see any reasons why they should delete it. They should have discussions about that, and APOC could have that on their own agenda. That was part of the purpose of having a discussion amongst themselves.

Council Member Torres-Walker inquired if they had to vote on Chair Taylor’s motion.

Assistant City Attorney Kundinger confirmed that the Council Members must vote since there was a motion and a second on the floor.

Council Member Rocha stated that if there were some questions or concerns about that, then they could discuss it. However, his question would be, if this was agendized, clearly it was going to be the topic of discussion that night, he was unsure why they would want to remove it if it was Item #1?

Council Member Torres-Walker provided clarification to Council Member Rocha’s question. She stated that there was no discussion with the full commission that the item would be coming back, and they had already been in discussion about how to get somebody to the meeting who had a background and civilian oversight. That w ould help them assist the commission through discussion around goals. They were hoping that once they came to some conclusion, then that discussion would come back to council unless anybody has a background in civilian police oversight bodies that they can add based on their experience.

Council Member Rocha clarified that the purpose was to reduce the agenda to items two and three, and to have Item #1 for discussion on another day.

Mayor Pro Tem Frietas stated t hat they had two separate bodies . He assumed for it to be approved that both bodies needed to approve? He insisted they were not a group of twelve.

Assistant City Attorney Kundinger confirmed that it was his understanding that it was a group of twelve.

APOC & City Council Minutes
Special Meeting
June 15, 2026 Page 3 of 19

Mayor Pro Tem Frietas declined to acknowledge that it was a group of twelve. He stated that they had to wait fifteen months to have a joint meeting to discuss those items.

Commissioner Lacey-Oha stated that she d id not see anything wrong with APOC tableabling this until their next meeting. Because it was discussed previously, she would stand behind Chair Taylor and Vice-Chair Williams.

Council Member Torres-Walker provided further clarification that technically, it was supposed to be specifically APOC original meeting. It was now a joint meeting of the City Council and APOC.

So, the question now lie around where the authority was related to motions and decisions as the two bodies combined. Where did most of the body lie?

Assistant City Attorney Kundinger confirmed that it was his understanding that it was a vote of the bodies combined. It would be a majority vote of the twelve.

Mayor Pro Tem Frietas inquired about what code did that fall under?

Assistant City Attorney Kundinger stated that he would investigate it. There was nothing in their ordinance about joint meetings specifically. It did state that the majority of the bodies, which was where he based his opinion on. However, it was currently not available.

Mayor Bernal stated that for the purpose of the meeting, tonight was chosen because this was the night that APOC already had a meeting. They thought it would be good to combine it, so that most people c ould attend special meeting/study sessions. Something similar was done with Planning Commission a couple months ago. It was established as more of a discussion. There was no voting. It was just to gain understanding. Therefore, the first item, he was not sure if the title of it may be confusing. But it was meant as an introductory item just to go over what the roles and responsibilities were of the oversight commission. So that was the intent of this item.

Council Member Torres-Walker inquired about whether it would fall under discussion related to the ordinance , or whether it would be under the current roles and responsibilities of the commission outlined in the ordinance . T hey were going to have a conversation about that tonight. She believed what Chair Taylor and the commission were saying was that they wanted to remove Item #1 , because that was a part of their original agenda. They wanted a facilitator who had a background in civilian oversight to set those goals and to present them to council. If they were going to be discussing the ordinance tonight, then they would be discussing the role of the civilian oversight.

Administrative Analyst Gomez announced that Commissioner Ben-Oni arrived at 6:43 p.m.

Assistant City Attorney Kundinger provided a correction regarding city code, which state d that where the rules of procedure were silent than Robert’s Rules of Order Control , the two bodies were two distinct groups. Thus, they did not vote together. They would be voting as two separate groups. That was what Mayor Pro Tem Frietas was saying . Based on research conducted, Assistant City Attorney Kundinger would agree with that opinion.

APOC & City Council Minutes
Special Meeting
June 15, 2026 Page 4 of 19

Council Member Torres-Walker inquired, did it mean that the commission would take a vote, then the council would take a vote?

Assistant City Attorney Kundinger confirmed, yes.

Council Member Torres-Walker inquired about what vote took precedence.

Assistant City Attorney Kundinger stated that their city code address ed what happens if there were a tie , then the motion does not pass. Therefore, both bodies would have to vote affirmatively. It could be brought up at another time. It would not control.

Commissioner Kennedy stated that it concerned her to put it off completely. They did not have an RFP created, or a list of consultants to interview, which could take months.

Chair Taylor addressed Mayor Pro Tem Frietas regarding waiting for fifteen months to host a joint session. That was on behalf of council, and they c ould not agendize for them. How could future roles and goals be suggested if there was no ordinance fully in place?

After the motions, Mayor Ron Bernal stated that Item #1 continues:

Acting City Manager Cortez presented Item #1 via printed hard copies.

B. PUBLIC COMMENT ITEM #1

Kathryn R. Wade was frustrated regarding the death of her son and complained how nothing has been done for years via leadership team for police brutality. She requested a thorough investigation via APOC regarding the murder of her son. She complained that the commissioners should be allowed to review citizens’ complaints.

Leslie May provided information regarding the Brown Act and other information that she researched via internet. She stated that there was an ordinance established. She researched the meaning of the Rosenberg’s Rule of Order to comply with the Brown Act and read it during public hearing. She stated that City Manager Bessie Scott had plans in place until she was dismissed, because she was too powerful. She was making the city do what it was supposed to do by law.

Krystle Law said that people and commissioners had to wait 15 months. She wanted them to see it from the commissioner and public’s standpoints, and they did not need Human Resources (HR). She also stated that even though there were things that Mayor Pro Tem Frietas may not agree with, there may be things that she does not agree with him either. However, even if he did not agree, then he should allow it, so that they can do things correctly. The commissioners were not allowed to touch or see complaints given via police department. The only complaints they were only allowed to deal with were if the public complained at public hearings, or if they were told about a complaint.

Assistant City Attorney Kundinger provided clarification and stated that it was Antioch’s currently existing….that was taken from the current APOC ordinance. So, that was their current law. That APOC & City Council Minutes
Special Meeting
June 15, 2026 Page 5 of 19

was just one section, which was Section 4 -3.110; the powers and duties of the Antioch Police Oversight Commission.

Frank Sterling explained that he applied for the commission and after going to several opening meetings, it was clear that he did not know exactly what it entailed. He stated that the training helped him understand the actual responsibility and goal he could achieve. Det ermining roles and responsibilities were very important.

Mayor Pro Tem Frietas stated that with regards to Chair Taylor, he did not want to delete Item #1, but he thought she was correct. With regards to Item #1, a presentation was needed for Item #3. They needed to understand what the new law AB847 really implied, because he though t it would guide them with regards to the roles, responsibilities, and goals of APOC. He did not know how to discuss number one without talking about number three.

Mayor Pro Tem Frietas motioned to move--- that they should suspend the agenda and have the presentation on item three addressing Assembly Bill 847.

Mayor Bernal stated that there was a motion on the council side to move Item #3 to the beginning of the meeting.

Mayor Pro Tem Frietas corrected Mayor Bernal and stated that he wanted to delete Item #1.

Mayor Bernal stated that there was a motion on the Council side to move Item #3 ahead of Item #1. Then he stated that it died due to lack of a second. Now, they had to revisit Item #1 discussing the roles, responsibilities, and goals of Antioch Oversight Commission. He suggested reviewing the current roles and responsibilities as a baseline for their discussion.

Council Member Torres -Walker stated that her confusion was that it did not have to be three agenda items. The roles or discussion around modifying the ordinance also included the discussion around powers and duties, which would have included Chair Taylor’s first recommendation to revi ew the assembly bill before discussing the ordinance. Therefore, they could be based on state legislation, which would give APOC more authority as mentioned in the assembly bill. In her opinion, Item #1 and Item #2 were similar. She inquired if they would also address the current duties in Item #1 and Item #2, which were recommendations from APOC on change. She also stated that City Council had not made any recommendations on changes to the ordinance. She referred to the red -lined document and reviewed a document from APOC regarding recommendations that they made that should be changes to the ordinance. She did not r ecall City Council discussing changes to the ordinance and sending those recommendations.

Commissioner Kennedy stated her interpretation via reviewing blue-lined and red-lined versions of the two documents of the APOC discussion.

Vice-Chair Williams wanted to move forward with their agenda.

Commissioner Lacey-Oha provided her interpretation of her review of the blue-lined and red - lined versions of the two documents. She inquired about where they originated.

APOC & City Council Minutes
Special Meeting
June 15, 2026 Page 6 of 19

Chair Taylor responded that their recommendation was in red, and the blue lines were from the prior meetings that they had discussed in their ordinance.

Chair Taylor highlighted what Council Member Torres-Walker mentioned about item one that the Council just voted against the motion. It was literally as mentioned by the City Attorney, the ordinance. Therefore, it was extremely redundant to go over Item #2 twice.

Mayor Bernal inquired if everyone (APOC team) understood what the current roles and responsibilities were of APOC.

Commissioner Lacey-Oha confirmed that they knew when they were appointed.

Chair Taylor suggested politely and respectfully that the council members reviewed APOC meetings, because they heavily went over their ordinance , which was how Commissioner Kennedy and she were able to draft the recommended amendments in their agenda that was sitting before the Commissioners.

Mayor Bernal inquired if any of the commission or council members had any questions or comments about the current roles and responsibilities of APOC.

Council Member Rocha suggested that if there were no questions, then they should move on to Item #2.

Mayor Bernal concurred, concluded Item #1, and moved onto Item #2.

2. DISCUSSION ITEM: OVERVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE ANTIOCH POLICE

OVERSIGHT COMMISSION ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS

A. Presentation by Kevin Kundinger, Assistant City Attorney

Assistant City Attorney Kundinger stated in the staff report on October 14, 2025, he presented the ordinance to council to get input as to what changes they would like. So, the city consulted with APOC to formulate some suggestions. However, as time progressed, it seemed that APOC felt as if those suggestions were not accurately portrayed to council. So, to facilitate the discussion, he presented before them.

Assistant City Attorney Kundinger stated that first is the suggested am endments to ordinance that were given on October 14, 2025, those are the blue line amendments, which are Attachment A. There are red line amendments. They had a meeting on June 1st, with APOC, and they voted on and decided on the changes they would like to see. They were outlined in the second red line document. Both were presented, one could see the original ordinance that council had already considered, and what APOC would like council to consider.

APOC & City Council Minutes
Special Meeting
June 15, 2026 Page 7 of 19

He suggested that the commission should address the council and tell them about the changes they would like them to see. If they d id not match up with what they already ha d, then the discussion could continue from there.

B. Public Comment Item #2

Leslie May requested for four minutes to speak, and Mayor Bernal granted it.

Leslie May reviewed the law online and provided comments. Furthermore, she did not agree that the mayor should solely nominate candidates for membership to the Police Commission to the City Council for approval.

Assistant City Attorney Kundinger stated that since a member of the public was given four minutes to speak, then that will be the new baseline time for Item #2 only . For the next item, it can revert to the three-minute time limit.

Kathryn R. Wade stated that they have fought for APOC for years to try to make change in the city. She stated that the city council members were interviewing the applica nts, and the people were from their district. She did not know how the mayor had taken control of that. She disagreed, because they were not in the community.

Krystal Law declined to speak for four minutes due to redundancy . She stated that she did not agree that the mayor should have sole responsibility for getting the commission board together, because they were not from the community.

Mayor Bernal stated that this item is before the commission and council for discussion.

Commissioner Torres -Walker requested that the commission explain the recommended changes for the public and have a discussion from there.

Chair Taylor confirmed.

Mayor Bernal asked a question regarding the council’s blue line and if they were not included in the commission’s red line, then does that mean they were not accepted?

Chair Taylor confirmed. She was not sure if he recalled that the council had a discussion.

Therefore, the assistant city manager and Consultant Addington presented it to council. They asked commissioners to come forward to speak, and so did several community members. The council members chose not to adopt the blue line items at that time. Since the discussion was paused and on hold, the commission decided to have the document drafted to bring something forward that reflected what they believed would be a positive addition to the current ordinance.

They did not remove anything; they only tried to strengthen it.

Mayor Bernal clarified that if it is not in their proposal or in the commission proposal, then this was what they would be recommending to council?
Chair Taylor confirmed. The blue line items the council did discuss, and the red line items were new recommendations.

APOC & City Council Minutes
Special Meeting
June 15, 2026 Page 8 of 19

Commissioner Kennedy presented, but she clarified the blue line version of the ordinance. She reviewed the blue line and red line ordinance again.

Before Commissioner Kennedy presented, Chair Taylor confirmed with Assistant City Attorney Kundinger that the items in blue were what was presented to council, and he confirmed.

Council Member Rocha stated that it appeared to him that the commission was not clear whe n the blue lined items came before them in October 2025. The items that were red lined came from the commissioner, and they would like them to be implemented. Somehow, there needed to be an overlay. Therefore, they could review both simultaneously, so they can compromise in the language.

Mayor Pro Tem Frietas discussed two items. Number one, since they had APOC there with the council, he wanted to hear their suggestions and explanations. He believed that they were finished with 43.102, and that Ms. May was right on 43301 Item #4. He did not believe that one employee of the Antioch Unified School District (AUSD) was appropriate. He did not know what the definition of youth was. But he would delete one employee and put youth and perhaps in parentheses eighteen to twenty-six years of age, or a student of Antioch Unified School District.

Assistant City Attorney Kundinger provided clarification regarding Subsection E and stated it shall not be eligible to serve. That was where city employees were listed.

Mayor Pro Tem Frietas stated he was on 4031, and Chair Taylor stated Section C4. Mayor Pro Tem Frietas stated section C.

Assistant City Attorney Kundinger reclarified Section C that they were not requirements for APOC as it currently stood.

Mayor Pro Tem Frietas reiterated his suggestion for 43301.

Vice-Chair Devin Williams departed at 8:52 p.m. and returned at 8:54 p.m.

Commissioner Torres-Walker asked a question to Mayor Pro Tem Frietas. For section 4-3.103, which was membership and appointments, which was where Mayor Pro Tem Frietas stated that to eliminate one employee to include students, youth, or young adult eighteen to twenty-six years old.

Assistant City Attorney Kundinger mentioned that that was suggestions from APOC. But that was language that was already current in the city ordinance about who was included or excluded.

He provided further clarification under Subsection C was not requirements for APOC. They were guidelines that were put in place at the time this ordinance was made back in 2022 for consideration.

Commissioner Torres-Walker requested for clarification for the language “shall’ was used.

APOC & City Council Minutes
Special Meeting
June 15, 2026 Page 9 of 19

Assistant City Attorney Kundinger stated that “shall” generally mea n must. However, this shall modify the strive, which means that you must try to meet what is there. But it was not a requirement for the commission. Therefore, if the council would like to strike that strive language, that would be possible. But that was not the way the current ordinance would read.

Mayor Pro Tem Frietas reiterated his suggestion regarding 4 -3103 subsection C4, and Chair Taylor concurred.

Council Member Rocha read through it and saw the intent to attempt to have representatives from each quadrant of the city district one, two, three, and four, but not required.

But Mayor Pro Tem Frietas commented that they had the ability and authority to change that if they were all in agreement via reviewing the red line. Perhaps get compromised on some of those items so that they can get some groundwork started.

Commissioner Torres -Walker stated that the mayor ha d the authority to interview and recommend appointments to council but did not have the authority to appoint.

Assistant City Attorney Kundinger stated to strive to include council members from their district by allowing them to interview a list of candidates from the commission. Then they pushed the recommendation up to the mayor. Then the mayor did a second look at the people who he could choose to recommend to council, then he chose to bring to council to recommend. So, they never really had the authority to appoint people from their district. But, because he strived for an inclusionary democratic process, he allowed them to have that.

Mayor Bernal preferred to use the latter, which was to interview and appoint without input from the council.

Vice-Chair Williams agreed it was appropriate to have different perspectives and did not have trust in the mayor. It must be fair and open.

Mayor Pro Tem Frietas made suggestion regarding Subsection C4 whether it was acceptable to council and APOC.

Commissioner Torres-Walker inquired if they must take a vote of both separate bodies to accept an amendment.

Assistant City Attorney Kundinger stated that because council was the only one with the authority to direct city staff, and if there were a vote tonight to include something, then there could be a request made to have this based off the discussion item. They needed to bring it forward to a council meeting with the proposed changes. He believed that it was enough to proceed with the consensus from city council, but they were not voting on anything tonight.

Chair Taylor personally d id not agree with the one change. But thought the goal was to go through the amendments so that they could come out with the bulk of the changes versus one.

APOC & City Council Minutes
Special Meeting
June 15, 2026 Page 10 of 19

Commissioner Lacey-Oha added that the mayor should not have the say on who should be appointed to APOC solely. It should go back to the original way it was done under the former mayor. They make a recommendation and if the mayor agrees, then he will bring that person before the city council. If he did not, then he should come back to them, and they would take it from there.

Chair Taylor clarified that it should include the other council members , because currently the process was that the mayor, the city manager, and the chair would do the interviews, right?

Commissioner Lacey-Oha concurred with Chair Taylor that one person should not be making the final decision.

Commissioner Kennedy stated that it was something that the council mentioned multiple times in Octobe r. There were aspects of APOC ordinance that were inconsistent with the city’s baseline boards and commission ordinance. For example, authority to interview candidates for all boards and commissions . Her understanding was that different mayors ha d different approaches to interviewing. Therefore, their suggestion was consistent with the baseline. If it were going to be different each time, then there would be no consistency for anyone.

Vice-Chair Williams stated that i f their community was not involved in this process, then how would they have a reflective body if it was left up to one person? She did not think that was fair.

Otherwise, she would not have been chosen. People had faith in her and that was why she is here today. She believed that they needed to reflect on how the ordinance was made, and how it was originally constructed.

Commissioner Lacey-Oha stated that they must listen to their concerned community members.

She was concerned about the conflict of interest, and that one person should not make the final decision.

Council Member Rocha provided a point of clarification that the mayor did not make the decision.

He may make the recommendation, but the majority make the decision. If he had a problem with any decision, then he c ould vote no. He believed that there should be consistency across the commission.

Vice-Chair Williams stated that whenever Mayor Bernal brought Commissioner Rocha, then he would vote with them via his observation. If there were a name or candidate, then he w ould go for it. There was no autonomy.

Commissioner Torres-Walker stated that when they first started this, she requested APOC to take them through the red line items and their justifications for the recommendations. Since there had been no voting authority, then it w ould be up the council to vote on that recommendation, because they had no power. She wanted to make clarification regarding who could appoint the mayor interviews and brought recommendations to council. The challenge was who came for them to vote up or down . It was not inclusive of everybody who was interviewed with lack of justification from the mayor . Why did he not recommend those folks ? She stated how prior policies worked. The new mayor was doing his own process; therefore, she did not want anyone to get policy confused. She requested for the commission go through the red line item.

APOC & City Council Minutes
Special Meeting
June 15, 2026 Page 11 of 19

Mayor Bernal requested to add a comment regarding the discussion. He stated that his goal was to follow ordinance . Chair Taylor and City Manager Scott were involved in all the interviews except for her own. Therefore, the process ha d been city manager, chair, and he with same questions for all candidates. They discussed it and went forward with recommendation . Four folks on this table have been a result.

Commissioner Kennedy continued to go through the red line items. She read, “The secretary or clerk if each border commission shall monthly prepare and deliver to the city clerk an attendance report of members”.

Chair Taylor wanted to highlight for that section , that it fits what Council Member Rocha mentioned, and all of them voted or discussed in October for wanting cohesiveness across all commissions.

Commissioner Kennedy continued.

Chair Taylor stated for transparency, they were not told where their funding was or the amount.

They started off this year with $75 k. But currently, the budget is being revised due to several staff transitions and miscommunication with funding codes, which was presented at the last meeting. Chief Vigil presented and they were currently adjusting the city codes to provide accurate budget amount. But the location of their funding was never questionable.

Commissioner Kennedy continued.

Chair Taylor wanted to highlight areas of concern that Commissioner Kennedy discussed, but they were not areas of concern for the full commission.

Mayor Bernal inquired about questions and comments regarding what has been presented.

Chair Taylor presented final comment regarding 4-3.110 and powers and duties. The section on the addition of internal affairs and complaints, within the blue subsection that the city attorney vetted along with Consultant Addington. Information was reviewed in October.

Assistant City Attorney Kundinger confirmed that it did not use the same terms internal affairs complaint. He believed that it used the term personnel complaints, but it could easily be adjusted should the council wanted to see updated language.

Chair Taylor reiterated that for 4-3.110 powers and duties, and the second paragraph Subsection A requested for an extension or an addition of powers to include internal affairs and complaints.

For Item G highlighted at the bottom, they currently receive quarterly reports from the Chief and had been since the inception of APOC. Unfortunately, due to California law in public comment, they were unable to get in-depth information.

Assistant City Attorney Kundinger provided further clarification for Subsection A of the power & duties section refer only to policy changes.

APOC & City Council Minutes
Special Meeting
June 15, 2026 Page 12 of 19

Mayor Bernal inquired how that would materially change how they were currently operating, and what would that change in the wording meant?

Assistant City Attorney Kundinger responded that it was regarding Subsection A. Yes, it would not change anything mechanically. He believed that APOC had already reviewed those types of policies.

Chair Taylor confirmed that they had reviewed those policies in the past.

Commissioner Ben -Oni from his understanding, APOC had not reviewed the internal affairs procedures as they have been updated.

Chair Taylor confirmed that they did before Commissioner Ben -Oni became commissioner.

Unfortunately, it had not been published yet, which was why the community members ha d not seen it yet. The APOC team was planning a meeting to discuss where they were at with publishing.

Commissioner Torres-Walker was confused about the AB847, and what new authorities did that assembly bill grant civilian oversight.

Chair Taylor responded to Commissioner Torres-Walker’s question and stated that AB847 took effect in January. She would like to elaborate on what the law does, but she tried to bring Item #3 forward to be educated on it. But the Commissioners voted no on the motion, and now they are uneducated.

Commissioner Torres-Walker did not agree to the changes made via APOC. She would like to be equipped on the subsection 4-3.110 under powers and duties if it were inclusive of Assembly Bill 847. She assumed that they will be making recommendations for this section of this presentation. She sought Assistant City Attorney Kundinger’s opinion.

Assistant City Attorney Kundinger provided a response and stated that he would go through AB47, then seek directions from council to determine how they would like to proceed.

Mayor Bernal inquired if anyone else had more questions on the ordinance, amendments, and change?

Commissioner Wilson requested for feedback on 43.111 public reports via temporary pause of the commission.

Commissioner Kennedy responded via discussing the consistency piece. The reality was that the state law allows city councils to create and uncreate boards and commissions of any type.

Assistant City Attorney Kundinger clarified that the temporary pause did not exist under the municipal code. Therefore, it did not exist under the municipal code , and it would be a new section that would have to be added.

APOC & City Council Minutes
Special Meeting
June 15, 2026 Page 13 of 19

Commissioner Torres-Walker was reviewing council’s recommendation that was not there on the day of the meeting. She would not have recommended it, because it was divisive and redundant. Council had the authority to disband any commission at will, because the commission served at the pleasure of council. The challenge was the text message scandal and what it meant for them to settle.

Commissioner Wilson inquired about what constitutes a temporary pause?

Commissioner Peterson commented on 4-3.112 how it was divisive and tone deaf.

Commissioner Torres-Walker departed the room at 8:19 p.m. and returned at 8:22 p.m.

Vice-Chair Williams departed the room at 8:52 p.m. and returned at 8:54 p.m.

Mayor Pro Tem Frietas left the room at 8:11 a.m. and returned at 8:15 p.m.

Commissioner or Council Member (unsure of name) left the room at 8:16 p.m. and returned at 8:18 p.m.

Commissioner Torres-Walker left the room at 8:19 p.m. and returned at 8:22 p.m.

Commissioner Tores-Walker departed at 8:58 p.m.

Commissioner Wilson departed at 9:23 p.m.

Mayor Bernal asked if there were any questions.

Commissioner Torres-Walker responded that it was already discussed on the dais, and that they had already completed the draft . They wanted to extend the opportunity for the public to be present, and to also recommend access to Zoom via SB77 for people who cannot make it to outside meetings. She mentioned that they voted several months ago to go down to one meeting per month and wanted to implement immediately if someone wanted to motion it.

Mayor Bernal requested for clarification via Assistant City Attorney Kundinger that they could not vote on changes to the ordinance.

Assistant City Attorney Kundinger confirmed no, but he was not sure if a motion was appropriate.

But he knew that APOC was seeking authorization to reduce the meetings to one time per month prior to the passage of the amendment. He stated that the entire process would take thirty days to come into effect. The new law cannot be changed at a special meeting ; it would have to go through a regular meeting.

Mayor Bernal inquired via Chair Taylor if they had gone down to one meeting per month in the past?

Chair Taylor confirmed no, and it was only for months that had holidays.

Mayor Bernal inquired from Assistant City Attorney Kundinger if the city council c ould make a vote to have consensus to move this to one meeting or do they need to bring it back?

Assistant City Attorney Kundinger suggested that he c ould direct them to bring the ordinance back ASAP.

APOC & City Council Minutes
Special Meeting
June 15, 2026 Page 14 of 19

Chair Taylor asked if it was the same process that was implemented earlier -- the commission and then council vote?

Assistant City Attorney Kundinger responded no, because that would be a legislative change, which cannot be made at special meeting.

Commissioner Kennedy inquired about the blue line item 4-3.109, the training heading, and Item D. The training requests requiring city funding must be pre-authorized by the city manager. Why would we be different than any other commission?

Chair Taylor inquired, did the other commissions have budgets?

Unsure who responded no. However, Chair Taylor stated that we d id not have cohesiveness there, and this was training, so it did not apply to travel in all cases.

Mayor Bernal inquired, so was this to add this to the list of changes that were being requested to make it consistent with other commissions?

Commissioner Kennedy responded that it was a question based on fact that there was an ordinance that state d that appointed and elected officials follow a particular policy based on travel and reimbursement.

Mayor Bernal reiterated his question regarding consistency.

Commissioner Kennedy responded that it was a question of clarification for their own purposes and what made them different.

Chair Taylor concurred, but unsure if it applied to Subsection D, because travel was not included.

Mayor Pro Tem Frietas stated that during the budget deliberation, they asked for travel policy to come back to city council to review or modify various sections in the policy. When w ould it be returned?

Acting City Manager (ACM) Cortez replied that after they adopt the budget perhaps second meeting in July.

Mayor Pro Tem Frietas replied July or August.

Mayor Bernal stated that they had the red line with a couple of additional items from the commission, and inquired if there were any more questions? Vice-Chair Williams inquired why the question regarding training and budget were discussed Chair Taylor replied perhaps it was due to Commissioner Kennedy bringing forward an overall- - was it a resolution?

Commissioner Kennedy replied that she believed that it was an ordinance.

APOC & City Council Minutes
Special Meeting
June 15, 2026 Page 15 of 19

Chair Taylor continued…that it reflected the way they were supposed to travel and being reimbursed. That Commissioner Kennedy was clarifying that this should not be there if they were following the other ordinance, which all the other commissions should be following also.

Commissioner Lacey-Oha inquired why the blue line was not added?

Chair Taylor replied that it was not added. Back in October, when the Assistant City Attorney Chief Addington drafted this and proposed it to everyone, and this is that. So, it was not anything new.

3. PRESENTATION: ASSEMBLY BILL (AB) 847, SHARP - COLLINS. PEACE OFFICERS:CONFIDENTIALITY OF RECORDS

Mayor Bernal stated that if there was not anything regarding this item, they would move on to Item #3. Assembly Bill AB 847, Sharp Collins, Peace Officer Confidentiality of Records presentation by our Assistant City Attorney.

A. Presentation by Kevin Kundinger, Assistant City Attorney

Assistant City Attorney Kundinger provided a presentation regarding Item #3, Assembly Bill AB 847, Sharp Collins, Peace Officer Confidentiality of Records presentation.

B. Public Comment Item #3

Mayor Bernal inquired if there were any public comments?

Administrative Analyst Gomez confirmed that we had four: Katherine Wade, Leslie May, Krystal Law, and Melissa Case.

Katherine Wade expressed her opinion regarding their pas t shows, that would support their action, then the police department acted against them. Commissioners needed to know. She believed that everything had been hidden from the community , and that the commissioners should have access to their records.

Krystal Law read the California assembly, Bill 847 from her cell phone and made a comment that the people who were part of the corruption were working in other cities . She provided her opinions and examples.

Melissa Case read from her cell phone and stated that the purpose of APOC was that the police commission should promote and encourage non -biased community -based policing . She discussed her opinion regarding oversight and shared personal experiences.

A speaker (name unknown) agreed with the other speakers before him. He felt that the point of APOC was for transparency. He shared personal experiences of his encounters with the police officers. He felt there was no discipline and no transparency.

APOC & City Council Minutes
Special Meeting
June 15, 2026 Page 16 of 19

Mayor Bernal stated that this was before council and commission regarding including this assembly bill into the police oversight duties.

Mayor Pro Tem Frietas stated that he would like Chief Vigil to come forward to provide his view of Assembly Bill 947.

Chief Vigil provided his insight regarding the Assembly Bill 947.

Mayor Pro Tem Frietas referred to the staff report regarding AB847 for various Bay Area Cities.

He inquired with Chief Vigil if there were any cities that he was aware of that had absolutely seven items under the analysis.

Chief Vigil deferred the question to Assistant City Attorney Kundinger who provided a detailed response.

Commissioner Torres-Walker inquired if Assistant City Attorney Kundinger researched o ther websites, reviewed the ordinance , and determined that they did not change it. Was there a discussion with anyone from those municipalities regarding it?

Assistant City Attorney Kundinger provided a response and stated that he just reviewed the website to determine if anyone ha d enacted something. So far, no , and he was not aware of anything else.

Commissioner Torres-Walker inquired to Chief Vigil what was on the website portal for public viewing?

Chief Vigil responded that they ha d different IA portals, and they had been working on sharing them with the public. Because the computer systems were dated, it was harder than they thought to build it out. However, they had EIS systems that were turned on two to three years ago to monitor not just complaints, but various tracking as well.

Mayor Bernal inquired what role does Police Consultant Seppal play in bolstering the work that the current police department does?

Chief Vigil stated that Police Consultant Seppal also audited complaints and ensured that it was fair across the board for sworn and non-sworn staff.

Mayor Bernal inquired if Police Consultant Sep pal was entitled to see information that an oversight commission would not be able to see?

Police Consultant Sepal confirmed that he did not do audits. He read internal affairs investigation to ensure it was th orough, complete, and findings were accurate. Then, he w ould have a conversation with Chief Vigil to determine disciplinary action to be fair and consistent.

Mayor Bernal confirmed that Police Consultant Seppal was an independent individual to ensure that police department was fair, accurate, and consistent.

Unknown person confirmed.

APOC & City Council Minutes
Special Meeting
June 15, 2026 Page 17 of 19

Assistant City Attorney Kundinger stated that Police Consultant Seppal was doing that as part of the DOJ, MOA, and Buris agreement. However, they did not have an internal auditor position.

Mayor Bernal inquired if that was required through either of the two settlements?

Assistant City Attorney Kundinger confirmed, no. The intention was that due to reform efforts, they were trying to fix everything to make sure that it was going the way it should with hope that once the culture was instilled, then the city would have the pieces in place to conduct that itself.

Commissioner Kennedy requested clarification on the fact sheet regarding not having subpoena powers, and if they did not automatically have it. She requested confirmation from Assistant City Attorney Kundinger.

Assistant City Attorney Kundinger confirmed that they d id not have subpoena powers.

Furthermore, he stated that he could not provide a confirmation request, because the legislature put out law, but they did not interpret it. Only judges did that. To get an interpretation, there must be a lawsuit.

Chair Taylor inquired about what was required to adopt portions of AB847?

Assistant City Attorney Kundinger responded that it would require adding the powers granted by AB847 to the powers and duties of APOC, which cannot be done tonight.

Chair Taylor inquired that they were discussing what the implementation looked like vs. whether it was optional or not, because it was state law. The goal was implementation, right? Assistant City Attorney Kundinger stated that the discussion tonight was whether there was a direction from council to start looking into that because there were many things there.

Implementation goal was up to council.

Commissioner Kennedy inquired about more detail on the required qualifications , background investigations, and certifications that will be required for APOC members authorized to inspect investigative records.

Assistant City Attorney Kundinger stated that he cannot fully elaborate on everything. However, he felt confident at bare minimum that the criminal background check, fingerprinting, and certain certification that one must undergo to review records.

Chair Taylor inquired from Chief Vigil that was it not SB1421 that allowed general community members to request personnel records?

Chief Vigil responded, yes and no. They have a portal on their website that has been active for a couple of years. Everything that was 1421abled was released and posted there.

Chair Taylor asked Chief Vigil to explain what 1421 meant.

APOC & City Council Minutes
Special Meeting
June 15, 2026 Page 18 of 19

Chief Vigil explained that it was the law that discloses use of force, different cases internally and externally within the police department. There was one clearing house for all of that was under the tab on the police department’s webpage.

Assistant City Attorney Kundinger clarified that 1421 is different, because it made those records into public records . Whereas AB1421 still le ft the current confidentiality in place, which mean t that one would still have certain requirements to access those confidential files.

Vice-Chair Williams asked a clarifying question from Commissioner Kennedy’s statement regarding the person on this body requires qualifications for APOC members ’ background investigations and certifications for all members authorized to inspect investigative records.

Chair Taylor explained on Commissioner Kennedy’s behalf that she was asking for clarification on what that would look like. But Assistant City Attorney Kundinger stated that at this time, he could not fully speak to that, because it was not developed yet.

Commissioner Kennedy requested clarification for the members of the commission to obtain the last bullet point, which was the possibility of claims that might arise from disclosure.

Chair Taylor concurred.

Assistant City Attorney Kundinger stated that he did not think it was proper to provide legal advice to the commissioners on personal liability.

Mayor Bernal stated that this question was for city council regarding whether they want APOC to include provisions of AB847 into their commission duties.

Commissioner Rocha commented that Chief Vigil shared earlier that there needed to be more discussion and investigation via how it could be reviewed as a potential transparency issue for the oversight committee. His recommendation was to have the chief, attorney’s office, and the acting city manager to review further and return with some potential recommendation before acting on ordinance changes.

Assistant City Attorney Kundinger inquired if that was the direction of city council to begin investigating the potential of adding AB847 and bring it back to council at a future meeting?

Mayor Pro Tem Frietas responded that he believed that Chief Vigil and Police Consultant Seppal raised many issues, and then he provided his opinion. He believed that it needed a thorough, objective, unbiased view before moving forward.

Mayor Bernal inquired if there was a consensus that a strike force of that group w ould work further on answering some of those questions?

Everyone confirmed, yes.

Mayor Bernal stated that would be the direction for the Assistant City Attorney.

APOC & City Council Minutes
Special Meeting
June 15, 2026 Page 19 of 19

Chair Taylor inquired if the commission could be included on the strike force, because she has a personal relationship with the members in the office who drafted the legislation.

Mayor Bernal replied, no, because he did not think that an internal group of folks were working on it.

Vice-Chair Williams inquired for Mayor Pro Tem Frietas to elaborate on why he said, “unbiased”?

Mayor Pro Tem Frietas replied to have an objective report.

Commissioner Lacey-Oha stated for clarification that Mayor Pro Tem Frietas did not think that it was beneficial for any of the commissioners to be a part of the task force.

Mayor Pro Tem Frietas confirmed that it would be inappropriate for any member of council to be on the task force.

ADJOURNMENT

Motioned by Council Member Rocha to adjourn the meeting , seconded by Mayor Bernal. Five Commissioners (Commissioner Torres-walker, Commissioner Wilson, Commissioner Soliz, Commissioner Lacey-Oha, Chair Taylor ) were absent and five unanimously adjourned the meeting at 9:24 p.m.

Respectfully submitted:

H. R.

HANEEFAH RASHEED, Administrative Analyst
B
08-11-26

STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

DATE: Regular Meeting of August 11, 2026

TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council

SUBMITTED BY: LaTonia Peoples-Stokes, Assistant City Clerk

SUBJECT: City Council Meeting Minutes of July 28, 2026

RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council continue the Meeting Minutes of July 28, 2026, to the next meeting.

FISCAL IMPACT
None.

DISCUSSION
N/A

ATTACHMENT
None.

LPS

CITY OF

A TICCH

CALIFORNIA
100 General Fund
Non departmental
00426363 CITY OF CLAYTON AUCTION PROCEEDS 3,667.92
00426383 DIVISION OF STATE ARCHITECT 2ND QTR 2026 REM ITTANCE 1,120.80 00426398 IN SHAPE HEALTH CLUBS PAYROLL 446.97
00426409 LIFE INSURANCE CO OF NORTH AMERICA PAYROLL 5, 209.32 00426412 MAHARAJ, DUSHYANT REF ECCRFFA FEE 24,354.46
00426422 OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL NO 3 PAYROLL 4,896. 00 00426427 PARS PAYROLL 12,291.52
00426445 STATE OF CALIFORNIA PAYROLL 383.18
00426464 AFLAC PAYROLL 9,020.03
00426482 EMPLOYEE REPLACEMENT CHECK 345.70
00426506 FIRE RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES PAYROLL 53,925. 89 00426528 MUNICIPAL POOLING AUTHORITY PAYROLL 3,558.75
00426529 MUNICIPAL POOLING AUTHORITY PAYROLL 9,493.03
00426539 EMPLOYEE REPLACEMENT CHECK 632.37
00426550 THOMPSON, SHERI DEPOSIT REFUND 60.00
00955317 ANTIOCH PD SWORN MGMT ASSOC PAYROLL 1,350.00
00955318 ANTIOCH POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION PAYROLL 2 4,487.52 00955319 ANTIOCH PUBLIC WORKS EMPLOYEE'S PAYROLL 2,450 .00 00955341 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTIONS PAYROLL 46,11 3.38 00955349 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION PAYROLL 36,134 .09 00955368 RANEY PLANNING & MANAGEMENT INC CONSULTING S ERVICES 33,329.27 City Attorney
00426367 COLE HUBER LLP LEGAL SERVICES 7,084.00
00426395 HANSON BRIDGETT LLP LEGAL SERVICES RENDERED 4 2,677.64 00426401 JACKSON LEWIS PC LEGAL SERVICES RENDERED 1,61 0.00 00426406 KRAMER WORKPLACE INVESTIGATIONS LEGAL SERVIC ES RENDERED 1,422.00 00426413 MEYERS NAVE A PROFESSIONAL CORP LEGAL SERVIC ES RENDERED 358,571.08 00426447 STERICYCLE INC SHRED IT 51.50
00426531 OFFICE DEPOT INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 82.33
00955324 COLANTUONO HIGHSMITH & WHATLEY PC LEGAL SERV ICES RENDERED 583.10 City Manager
00426356 BLUETRITON BRANDS INC WATER SERVICE 45.46
00426392 GALLEGOS, TRINE R COMMUNICATIONS SUPPORT 1,57 3.50 00426447 STERICYCLE INC SHRED IT 51.52
00426481 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES COPIER LEASE 422.05
00955344 SHIELD PROTECTION & PUBLIC SAFETY SECURITY S ERVICES 12,654.16 City Clerk
00426387 EIDEN, KITTY J MINUTES 2,750.00
00426447 STERICYCLE INC SHRED IT 51.50
00426506 FIRE RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES PAYROLL 298.35
In accordance with Antioch Municipal Code §3-2.01 regarding Warrants, the issued checks in this report have been certified by the Finance Director to be in conformance with the City's approved budget and are being presented to City Council for ratification and approval.

CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT

FOR THE PERIOD OF
JULY 17, 2026 - JULY 30, 2026
FUND/CHECK #
Finance Accounting
Prepared by: L. Reyes
07/30/2026 August 11, 2026 Page 1

CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT

FOR THE PERIOD OF
JULY 17, 2026 - JULY 30, 2026
FUND/CHECK #
00955326 DELL COMPUTER CORP ADOBE LICENSE 137.85
Human Resources
00426382 DIABLO LIVE SCAN LLC FINGERPRINTS APPS 860.00
00426397 HIRERIGHT GIS INTERMEDIATE CORP INC BACKGROU ND SERVICES 176.70 00426414 MICHELLE M FITZER INC CONSULTANT SERVICES 300 .00 00426417 MUNICIPAL POOLING AUTHORITY PAYROLL 930.40
00426481 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES COPIER LEASE 278.43
00426512 EMPLOYEE CHECK REPLACEMENT 45.00
00955326 DELL COMPUTER CORP ADOBE LICENSE 131.31
Finance Administration
00426481 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES COPIER LEASE 251.11
Finance Accounting
00955336 LSL LLP FY26 AUDIT 64,130.00
00955345 SUPERION LLC ASP SERVICES 24,555.92
00955372 SUPERION LLC ASP SERVICES 24,555.92
Finance Operations
00426465 AGUIRRE, DAMIEN MOISES EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 86.13 00426536 PROGRESSIVE SOLUTIONS INC BUSINESS LIC HOSTI NG/MTN 16,116.40 Non Departmental
00426418 MUNICIPAL POOLING AUTHORITY PAYROLL 51,245.28
00426419 MUNICIPAL POOLING AUTHORITY PAYROLL 4,144,849 .26 00426449 SWEETWATER CONSTRUCTION INC TUG/BARGE SERVIC E-EVENT 11,150.00 00955320 AVENU STARS SERVICE 1,215.51
00955371 SHIELD PROTECTION & PUBLIC SAFETY SECURITY S ERVICES-7/4/26 6,667.50 Public Works Administration
00426481 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES COPIER LEASE 196.00
Public Works Street Maintenance
00426420 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CA MEDICAL EX AM 133.00 00426438 SHARJO LLC ABATEMENT SERVICES-LABOR 6,858.32
00426455 URBAN RESTORATION GROUP GRAFFITI REMOVER 306. 76 00426462 ZAP MANUFACTURING INC SIGNS 4,861.05
00426480 C & J FAVALORA TRUCKING INC TRUCKING ASPHALT 15,450.00 00426504 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS TOOLS 532.86
00426506 FIRE RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES PAYROLL 174.81
00426514 HAWTHORN VENTURES LLC SAFETY SHOES- ESQUIVIA S, R 838.68 00955357 DKF SOLUTIONS GROUP LLC TRAINING 3,607.20
Public Works-Signal/Street Lights
00426425 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO ELECTRIC 1,785.39
Public Works-Facilities Maintenance
00426374 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR PARCEL TAX 38.08 00426375 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR PARCEL TAX 157.74 00426419 MUNICIPAL POOLING AUTHORITY PAYROLL 15,509.00
00426425 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO GAS 1,839.44
00426441 STAN'S HARDWARE LLC TOOLS 308.04
00426473 AVON, STEVE WILLIAMSON RANCH STONE 7,100.00
00426475 BAY ALARM COMPANY INSTALL SERVICES 4,635.62
00426491 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR PARCEL TAX 26.27 00426514 HAWTHORN VENTURES LLC SAFETY SHOES-STRONGMAN , E 575.00 Finance Accounting
Prepared by: L. Reyes
07/30/2026 August 11, 2026 Page 2

CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT

FOR THE PERIOD OF
JULY 17, 2026 - JULY 30, 2026
FUND/CHECK #
00426517 HOME DEPOT, THE PARTS 1,449.24
00426523 MARK PETERSEN CORP PLUMBING SERVICES 175.00
00426540 REAL PROTECTION INC. SERVICE CALL 740.00
00426546 STAN'S HARDWARE LLC PARTS 688.32
00955321 BAY CITIES PYROTECTOR FIRE TESTING- CITY HAL L 5,805.00 00955325 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS ELECTR ICAL SUPPLIES 3,158.33 00955350 ALTA FENCE CO GATE REPAIR 520.00
Public Works-Parks Maint
00426425 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO ELECTRIC 108.06
00426501 DICK DAVID DIANE & DOUGLAS ZYLSTRA PLANTS 1,0 82.06 00426552 WATERSAVERS IRRIGATION INC PARTS 148.10
00955363 KAY PARK RECREATION CORP SUPPLIES 2,580.65
Public Works-Median/General Land
00426425 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO ELECTRIC 65.76
00426546 STAN'S HARDWARE LLC SUPPLIES 15.78
00426552 WATERSAVERS IRRIGATION INC PARTS 1,794.83
00955357 DKF SOLUTIONS GROUP LLC TRAINING 3,607.20
Police Administration
00426344 ADAMSON POLICE PRODUCTS PD EQUIPMENT 3,028.74
00426357 BPS TACTICAL INC. PD UNIFORMS 1,271.48
00426372 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY TRAINING 822.00
00426378 CORE PSYCHOLOGICAL CORP NEW HIRE PSYCH 7,000. 00 00426385 EAN SERVICES LLC VEHICLE RENTALS 12,545.32
00426390 FEDEX PD SHIPPING 94.55
00426411 LOYAL 9 MANUFACTURING LLC SWAT EQUIPMENT 4,74 0.00 00426415 MILE HIGH SHOOTING ACCESSORIES LLC SNIPER RI FLE 33,626.71 00426430 QUENCH USA INC PD WATER 822.90
00426432 REACH PROJECT INC MAY 2026 SERVICES 34,166.00
00426436 SAVE MART SUPERMARKETS PD SUPPLIES 398.60
00426453 TRANSUNION RISK & ALT DATA SOLUTIONS LEO DA TABASE 217.00 00426458 VERIZON WIRELESS VEHICLE MODEMS 3,048.72
00426459 VICTORY TACTICAL GEAR LLC VESTS 9,874.65
00426463 ADAMSON POLICE PRODUCTS PD EQUIPMENT 33,668.7 9 00426467 AMERICAN RIVER COLLEGE TRAINING-KELLEY 103.50
00426468 ANDRADE, TANNER JASON EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 7 6.07 00426472 ARMSTRONG, KYLE ALEXANDER EXPENSE REIMBURSEM ENT 160.00 00426474 BAILEY, NAJEE AMIR PER DIEM 344.00
00426477 BOWER, SHANE R PER DIEM 344.00
00426481 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES COPIER LEASE 2,419.2 9 00426483 CHANDLER, JOSEPH ANTHONY PER DIEM 344.00
00426486 CODE 3 WEAR PUBLIC SAFETY OUTFITTERS PD UNIF ORMS 3,735.79 00426487 COLLAZO, JOSE ANTONIO PER DIEM 860.00
00426495 CORE PSYCHOLOGICAL CORP NEW HIRE PSYCH 500.00
00426496 CRIME SCENE CLEANERS INC CRIME SCENE CLEANUP 160.00 00426497 CRUMP, JEFFREY P. BACKGROUND 1,250.00
00426508 FLOCK GROUP, INC ALPR CAMERAS 99,000.00
00426511 GONZALEZ, ADRIAN E PER DIEM 344.00
00426513 GREEN, ROBERT A PER DIEM 344.00
Finance Accounting
Prepared by: L. Reyes
07/30/2026 August 11, 2026 Page 3

CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT

FOR THE PERIOD OF
JULY 17, 2026 - JULY 30, 2026
FUND/CHECK #
00426521 LEXISNEXIS SUBSCRIPTION FEE 253.13
00426522 MARCOTTE, BROCK A PER DIEM 344.00
00426524 MARLOW, CATHIE PER DIEM 172.00
00426525 MARLOW, CATHIE EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 73.79
00426526 MARQUES, SHAWN LUIS EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 33. 30 00426531 OFFICE DEPOT INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 282.94
00426534 PALMA, KRISTIAN PER DIEM 344.00
00426541 ROY, MICHAEL L CHECK REPLACEMENT 60.01
00426549 TAWNEY, GREGORY K-9 TRAINING 4,500.00
00426551 TURNAGE, AUTUMN M PER DIEM 258.00
00955330 GALLS LLC PD EQUIPMENT 427.87
00955346 T JUNG INVESTIGATIONS BACKGROUNDS 2,508.70
00955359 ENRICH ENTERPRISES INC. PD BADGES 996.24
00955360 GALLS LLC PD EQUIPMENT 3,141.81
00955365 MILLER MENDEL INC LICENSE USAGE 564.01
Compliance & Prof. Standards
00426399 INTL ASSOC OF CHIEFS OF POLICE LEGAL RESOURC E TOOL 1,225.00 00426407 KREINS CONSULTING RECRUITMENT & PROMOTIONS 49 ,500.00 00426436 SAVE MART SUPERMARKETS YOUTH ACADEMY 51.72
00426505 FASTSIGNS COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT 6,123.19
Police Community Policing
00426350 BARRICADE AI INC REPORT WRITING APPLICATION 7 ,100.00 00426379 CROSLEY GRACIE BRAZILIAN JIU-JITSU INC MAT S PACE RENTAL 250.00 00426389 FASTRAK VIOLATION PROCESSING ON DUTY TOLL 23. 50 00426404 KORIN, YAHYA SYCAMORE SUBSTATION 840.00
00426431 RAY ALLEN MANUFACTURING LLC K9 BITE SUIT 1,98 2.48 00426435 SAFE RESTRAINTS INC SAFETY RESTRAINTS 89,157. 75 00426479 EMPLOYEE ADVANCED DISABILITY PENSION 6,589.00
00426535 POWERDMS INC POWERREADY SUBSCRIPTION 5,180.31
00426537 PRYME INFIL INC SWAT DEPLOYMENT SOFTWARE 8,100.00 00426542 ROY, MICHAEL L CHECK REPLACEMENT 100.00
00426556 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 2,175.72
00426557 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 2,175.72
00426559 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,753.29
00426564 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,708.18
00426569 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,006.86
00426570 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 551.66
00426571 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 551.66
00426572 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 551.66
00426578 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 2,877.04
00955380 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 551.66
00955381 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 2,877.04
00955382 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 108.33
00955386 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,363.69
00955387 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 480.87
00955389 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 2,175.72
00955390 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 981.40
00955393 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,230.87
Finance Accounting
Prepared by: L. Reyes
07/30/2026 August 11, 2026 Page 4

CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT

FOR THE PERIOD OF
JULY 17, 2026 - JULY 30, 2026
FUND/CHECK #
00955394 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 551.66
00955396 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 2,175.72
00955400 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 2,175.72
00955403 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,168.86
00955404 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 2,175.72
00955409 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 551.66
00955411 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 435.00
00955413 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,169.00
00955416 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 981.40
00955425 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 2,175.72
00955426 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 933.06
00955431 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 2,175.72
00955433 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 2,175.72
00955434 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,160.00
00955435 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 2,175.72
00955438 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,941.95
00955446 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 2,175.72
00955452 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 551.66
00955453 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,169.00
00955454 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 236.90
00955455 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 2,175.72
00955457 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 693.84
00955462 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 2,877.04
00955464 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 194.83
00955465 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 714.65
00955466 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,647.45
00955467 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 2,175.72
00955471 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 2,175.72
00955478 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 981.40
00955480 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 2,877.04
00955482 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,033.14
00955483 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,591.29
00955484 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 714.65
00955486 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 2,738.00
00955488 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,941.95
00955490 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,449.15
00955491 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 503.50
00955492 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 2,877.04
00955493 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,006.86
00955494 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 2,058.83
00955496 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,169.00
00955500 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 2,175.72
00955504 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 2,175.72
00955506 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 2,220.83
00955510 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 2,175.72
00955511 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,169.00
00955513 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 551.66
00955514 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,591.29
Finance Accounting
Prepared by: L. Reyes
07/30/2026 August 11, 2026 Page 5

CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT

FOR THE PERIOD OF
JULY 17, 2026 - JULY 30, 2026
FUND/CHECK #
00955518 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 422.43
00955526 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 777.43
00955527 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 2,877.04
00955529 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,745.99
00955537 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 2,175.72
00955538 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 2,175.72
00955540 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 2,175.72
00955541 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 768.56
00955542 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 2,175.72
00955545 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 2,175.72
00955549 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 551.66
00955550 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 2,175.72
00955552 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 2,175.72
00955556 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 800.58
00955561 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 2,063.80
00955562 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 926.30
00955564 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,678.00
00955566 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 958.58
00955567 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 1,006.86
00955569 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 37.54
00955571 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 2,175.72
Police Traffic Division
00426436 SAVE MART SUPERMARKETS VSET SUPPLIES 56.22
Police Investigations
00426364 CLASSY GLASS TINTING VEHICLE TINT 550.00
00426371 COMMUNITY VIOLENCE SOLUTIONS 26/27 CHILDREN INTERVIEWS 12,342.34 00426373 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY EXTRADITIONS 485.00
00426386 EAN SERVICES LLC ON DUTY TOLL 26.90
00426437 SEROLOGICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE DNA EVIDENCE PROCESSING 4,600.00 00426446 STATE OF CALIFORNIA FINGERPRINT 654.00
00426450 T MOBILE USA INC CELL PHONE EVIDENCE 660.00
00426452 THOMSON WEST CRIME ANALYSIS 1,995.00
00426476 EMPLOYEE ADVANCED DISABILITY PENSION 7,321.00
00426520 LEADSONLINE PARENT LLC LICENSES 32,177.00
00426548 T MOBILE USA INC CELL PHONE EVIDENCE 165.00
00955378 WILLIAMS SCOTSMAN INC EVIDENCE STORAGE 246.94
PD Special Investigations Unit
00426385 EAN SERVICES LLC VEHICLE RENTALS 3,753.65
Police Communications
00426366 CLEAR CHOICE HEADSETS & TECHNOLOGY DISPATCH HEADSETS 2,902.00 00426369 COMCAST CONNECTION SERVICES 566.37
00426426 PACIFIC TELEMANAGEMENT SERVICES PAY PHONE 78. 00 00426506 FIRE RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES PAYROLL 99.45
00426509 GLOBALSTAR INC SATELITE PHONE 273.69
00955342 NORTHERN COMMUNICATION SERVICES INC 911 ROUT ING 690.50 Police Community Volunteers
00426436 SAVE MART SUPERMARKETS VIPS EVENT 23.22
Finance Accounting
Prepared by: L. Reyes
07/30/2026 August 11, 2026 Page 6

CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT

FOR THE PERIOD OF
JULY 17, 2026 - JULY 30, 2026
FUND/CHECK #
Police Facilities Maintenance
00426517 HOME DEPOT, THE ELECTRICAL PARTS 35.08
00955321 BAY CITIES PYROTECTOR QUATERLY PD INSPECTION 515.00 00955353 CLUB CARE INC GYM MAINTENANCE 305.00
Youth Network Services
00426352 BE A MENTOR INC JUNE SERVICES 100.00
00426358 BRIDGE BUILDERS TO THE NEW GENERATION FINAL INVOICE CAMP 26,373.25 00426434 RICHMOND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION PROFESSIONAL S ERVICES 9,433.40 00426543 RR MINISTRIES SUMMER TUTORING 5,290.00
00426554 YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOC OF EB PROFESSION AL SERVICES 7,425.30 Housing and Homelessness
00426478 BRISTOL, KATHARINE G CONSULTING SERVICES 4,95 0.00 Violence Intervention & Preven
00955367 PURPOSE DIGNITY ACTION JUNE SERVICES 5,000.00
PSCR Administration
00426416 MISSION EDGE SAN DIEGO COMMUNITY OUTREACH 3,9 80.90 00426481 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES COPIER LEASE 204.13
00955336 LSL LLP FY26 AUDIT 5,720.00
CD Economic Dev.
00426361 CELEBRATE ANTIOCH FOUNDATION GRANT REIMBURSE MENT 5,000.00 Community Development Land Planning Services
00426368 COLORADO, DELIA TRANSLATION SERVICES 450.00
00955338 MNG PARTNERSHIP HOLDINGS LLC LEGAL AD 153.00
CD Code Enforcement
00426443 STATE CONTROLLERS OFFICE FTB OFFSETS 42.23
PW Engineer Land Development
00426503 ENERGUY, THE REFUND EP2604-0197 1,377.00
00955334 INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 94,843.58 00955347 TESTING ENGINEERS INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6,569.27 Community Development Building Inspection
00426412 MAHARAJ, DUSHYANT REF GRN BLDG RES FEE 4,386. 00 00955369 RED WING SHOE STORE SAFETY SHOES- SERAFIN, C 250.00 Capital Imp. Administration
00426481 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES COPIER LEASE 283.93
00955356 DELL COMPUTER CORP ADOBE LICENSE 26.37
203 ERF Grant Fund
Housing and Homelessness
00955370 RUDRAM LLC EXECUTIVE INN LEASE 102,300.00
204 California Volunteers Grant Fund
Youth Network Services
00426428 PEATVIENNA, KYOKO INTERNSHIP-BALLOON ARCH 400 .00 206 American Rescue Plan Fund
Non departmental
00426440 SMART WAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLC WIFI PROJECT-SER VICE 70,262.52 212 CDBG Fund
CDBG
00426376 CONTRA COSTA SENIOR LEGAL SERVICES Q4FY-25-2 6-CCSLS-REIM 43.39 00426423 OPPORTUNITY JUNCTION Q4FY25-26-OPJT-REIM 2,50 0.00 Finance Accounting
Prepared by: L. Reyes
07/30/2026 August 11, 2026 Page 7

CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT

FOR THE PERIOD OF
JULY 17, 2026 - JULY 30, 2026
FUND/CHECK #
00426488 COMMUNITY VIOLENCE SOLUTIONS Q4FY-25-26-CVS- REIM 2,500.00 00426490 CONTRA COSTA CHILD CARE COUNCIL Q4 FY25-26 - COCO - REIM 3,887.99 00426493 CONTRA COSTA FAMILY JUSTICE ALLIANCE Q4FY25- 26-CCFJC-REIM 2,004.60 00426527 MEALS ON WHEELS DIABLO REGION Q4FY25-26-MOWC M-REIM 4,995.08 00426532 OMBUDSMAN SERVICES OF CCC Q4FY-25-26-EMPA-RE IM 2,310.09 213 Gas Tax Fund
Streets
00426425 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO ELECTRIC 664.92
214 Animal Services Fund
Animal Services
00426345 AIRGAS INC VET SUPPLIES 439.87
00426354 BEVERLY, KELLY LYNN EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 84. 76 00426419 MUNICIPAL POOLING AUTHORITY PAYROLL 119,734.2 3 00426516 HILLS PET NUTRITION PET FOOD 1,382.30
00426530 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY CO VET SUPPLIES 6,558.8 7 00955333 IDEXX LABORATORIES INC LAB SERVICES 56.79
215 Civic Arts Fund
Civic Arts
00426419 MUNICIPAL POOLING AUTHORITY PAYROLL 3,209.00
216 Park-In-Lieu Fund
Non departmental
Parks & Open Space
00426391 FRONTLINE GENERAL ENGINEERING CONSTR PROGRES S PAYMENT #9 5,389.51 00426412 MAHARAJ, DUSHYANT REF PARK IN LIEU FEE 1,500. 00 00426448 STOCKBRIDGE GENERAL CONTRACTING INC PROGRESS PAYMENT #1 117,575.00 219 Recreation Fund
Non departmental
00426499 DAVIS-WATKINS, TRACEY DEPOSIT REFUND 423.00
00426510 GONZALES, MYLA DEPOSIT REFUND 500.00
00955371 SHIELD PROTECTION & PUBLIC SAFETY SECURITY S ERVICES 1,312.50 Nick Rodriguez Community Cent
00426343 ACTIVE NETWORK LLC SENIOR CENTER PYMT DEVICE 531.74 00426419 MUNICIPAL POOLING AUTHORITY PAYROLL 39,956.65
00426481 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES COPIER LEASE 287.28
00426531 OFFICE DEPOT INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 102.03
00955373 ULINE INC TABLES FOR NRCC 8,112.25
Recreation Sports Programs
00426419 MUNICIPAL POOLING AUTHORITY PAYROLL 27,778.62
00426451 TEAMSIDELINE.COM SPORT LEAGUE SOFTWARE 1,199. 00 00426517 HOME DEPOT, THE LAWN MOWER 352.81
Recreation-Comm Center
00426381 DELTA KAYAK ADVENTURES INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 745 .50 00426384 DUGAND, KARINA INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 262.80
00426405 KOVALICK, LUANNE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 234.00
00426419 MUNICIPAL POOLING AUTHORITY PAYROLL 152,427.9 2 00426421 OFFICE DEPOT INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 46.29
00426517 HOME DEPOT, THE SUPPLIES 19.36
00426531 OFFICE DEPOT INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 111.49
Finance Accounting
Prepared by: L. Reyes
07/30/2026 August 11, 2026 Page 8

CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT

FOR THE PERIOD OF
JULY 17, 2026 - JULY 30, 2026
FUND/CHECK #
00426547 SUPERIOR FLOOR FTC LLC CARPET INSTALL FOR AC C 11,383.00 00955326 DELL COMPUTER CORP COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 3,591.8 3 Recreation Water Park
00426346 ALAGWU, DONALD DEPOSIT REFUND 872.00
00426370 COMMERCIAL POOL SYSTEMS INC CO2 JULY TANK RE NTAL 80.34 00426388 ELIFEGUARD INC LIFEGUARD RESCUE BAG 484.51
00426394 HAHLOV, MIHAELA CHECK REPLACEMENT 109.00
00426402 JAVIER SANCHEZ LOBBY PAINTING 8,320.00
00426419 MUNICIPAL POOLING AUTHORITY PAYROLL 107,084.9 3 00426424 ORIGINAL WATERMAN STAFF UNIFORMS 2,432.79
00426481 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES COPIER LEASE 402.36
00426500 DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS HUMPHREY RAQSI INSPECTION 171.25 00426506 FIRE RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES PAYROLL 226.66
00426517 HOME DEPOT, THE SUPPLIES 1,145.72
00426533 ONTIVEROS-LOPEZ, GISELA DEPOSIT REFUND 260.00
00955340 NATIONAL AQUATICS SERVICES INC POOL SERVICE 5 ,780.15 00955355 DC ELECTRIC GROUP INC PARTS & SERVICE 3,099.6 2 220 Traffic Signalization Fund
Traffic Signals
00426412 MAHARAJ, DUSHYANT REF TRAFFIC SIGN RES FEE 43 0.00 00955362 INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 44,780.00 223 Child Care Fund
Child Care
00426419 MUNICIPAL POOLING AUTHORITY PAYROLL 2,118.00
226 Solid Waste Reduction Fund
Solid Waste
00426419 MUNICIPAL POOLING AUTHORITY PAYROLL 15,053.61
00426506 FIRE RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES PAYROLL 95.94
00955326 DELL COMPUTER CORP ADOBE LICENSE 26.64
229 Pollution Elimination Fund
Channel Maintenance Operation
00426410 LIVE OAK ASSOCIATES INC BIOLOGIST SERVICES 4, 457.82 00426419 MUNICIPAL POOLING AUTHORITY PAYROLL 55,011.66
00426429 PEPPER INVESTMENTS INC PEST CONTROL 605.00
00426439 SILVA, DAVID LANDSCAPE SERVICES 5,760.00
00426506 FIRE RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES PAYROLL 236.09
00426545 SILVA, DAVID LANDSCAPE SERVICES 5,760.00
00955316 ALTA FENCE CO FENCE PARTS 426.00
Storm Drain Administration
00955326 DELL COMPUTER CORP ADOBE LICENSE 53.28
243 ADU Program Fund
Community Development Building Inspection
00426442 STANKER, REBECCA ADU REBATE 5,000.00
00426544 RRM DESIGN GROUP CONSULTANT SERVICES 6,902.75
255 Park 1A Maintenance District Fund
Park 1A Maintenance District
00426369 COMCAST CONNECTION SERVICES 113.80
00426425 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO ELECTRIC 67.98
Finance Accounting
Prepared by: L. Reyes
07/30/2026 August 11, 2026 Page 9

CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT

FOR THE PERIOD OF
JULY 17, 2026 - JULY 30, 2026
FUND/CHECK #
257 SLLMD Administration Fund
SLLMD Administration
00426419 MUNICIPAL POOLING AUTHORITY PAYROLL 57,998.62
00426517 HOME DEPOT, THE TOOLS 1,450.13
311 Capital Improvement Fund
Parks & Open Space
00426489 CONSOLIDATED PARTITIONS INC SENIOR CENTER PA RTITION 27,000.00 00955338 MNG PARTNERSHIP HOLDINGS LLC LEGAL AD 583.44
Public Buildings & Facilities
00955338 MNG PARTNERSHIP HOLDINGS LLC LEGAL AD 503.88
312 Prewett CIP Fund
Parks & Open Space
00426469 ANTIOCH BUILDING MATERIALS PARK ROCK 6,153.33
322 Development Impact-Public Wrks Fund
Dev Impact - Public Works
00426412 MAHARAJ, DUSHYANT REF DEV IMP PUB WKS FEE 445 .00 323 Development Impact-Police Fund
Dev Impact - Police
00426408 LEHR PURSUIT NORTH PARTS 15,362.03
00426412 MAHARAJ, DUSHYANT REF DEV IMP POLICE FEE 1,19 0.00 324 Development Impact-Parks&Rec Fund
Dev Impact - Parks & Rec
00426412 MAHARAJ, DUSHYANT REF DEV IMP PARKS & REC FE E 3,261.00 376 Lone Diamond Fund
Assessment District
00426419 MUNICIPAL POOLING AUTHORITY PAYROLL 66.00
00426538 PUBLIC STORAGE MONTHLY STORAGE 341.55
570 Equipment Maintenance Fund
Equipment Maintenance
00426353 BELKORP AG LLC PARTS 572.46
00426355 BILL BRANDT FORD PARTS 468.35
00426419 MUNICIPAL POOLING AUTHORITY PAYROLL 163,221.5 0 00426441 STAN'S HARDWARE LLC PARTS 8.88
00426456 VACA VALLEY TRUCK INC GATE REPLACEMENT 544.67
00426460 WALNUT CREEK FORD PARTS 124.98
00426484 CHUCKS BRAKE & WHEEL SERVICE INC PARTS 712.26
00955315 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES PREMIUM RENEWAL 9, 884.00 00955328 FALCON COLLISION REPAIR INC AUTO BODY PARTS 1 8,465.04 00955337 MIDWEST MOTOR SUPPLY CO INC PARTS 399.19
00955339 MUNICIPAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT INC PARTS 243.09 00955343 OREILLY AUTO ENTERPRISES LLC PARTS 132.30
00955364 MIDWEST MOTOR SUPPLY CO INC PARTS 234.82
00955366 MUNICIPAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT INC PARTS 5,0 95.72 00955374 UNICO GLASS LLC AUTO WARNING SENSOR 2,160.28
573 Information Services Fund
Non departmental
00426360 CARAHSOFT TECHNOLOGY CORP CHECK REPLACEMENT 9 2,719.83 Finance Accounting
Prepared by: L. Reyes
07/30/2026 August 11, 2026 Page 10

CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT

FOR THE PERIOD OF
JULY 17, 2026 - JULY 30, 2026
FUND/CHECK #
Information Services
00426419 MUNICIPAL POOLING AUTHORITY PAYROLL 21,600.65
Network Support & PCs
00426348 AMERICAN REGISTRY INTERNET NUMBERS ANNUAL FE E FOR /24 IP BLOCK 275.00 00426360 CARAHSOFT TECHNOLOGY CORP CHECK REPLACEMENT 8 ,605.73 00426419 MUNICIPAL POOLING AUTHORITY PAYROLL 61,301.63
00426481 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES COPIER LEASE 61.01
00426506 FIRE RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES PAYROLL 189.90
00955329 FRESHWORKS INC FRESHSERVICE ADD'L LIC 1,041.5 3 00955335 JACOBSOHN, PAUL WEBMASTER SERVICES 9,365.00
Telephone System
00426419 MUNICIPAL POOLING AUTHORITY PAYROLL 2,336.11
GIS Support Services
00426419 MUNICIPAL POOLING AUTHORITY PAYROLL 47,423.20
Office Equipment Replacement
00955326 DELL COMPUTER CORP COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 7,764.0 9 578 Post Retirement Medical-Misc Fund
Non Departmental
00426558 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 218.00
00426561 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 74.69
00426563 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 74.69
00426566 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 316.77
00426567 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 74.69
00426568 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 547.38
00426574 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 551.61
00426575 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 74.69
00426576 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 221.00
00955379 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 311.38
00955383 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 709.38
00955385 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 311.38
00955388 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 311.38
00955398 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 311.38
00955401 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 183.83
00955402 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 311.38
00955405 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 192.69
00955406 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 547.38
00955407 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 311.38
00955410 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 547.38
00955417 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 311.38
00955422 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 74.69
00955424 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 74.69
00955427 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 192.69
00955428 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 311.38
00955429 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 311.38
00955430 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 192.69
00955432 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 311.38
00955440 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 709.38
00955441 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 74.69
Finance Accounting
Prepared by: L. Reyes
07/30/2026 August 11, 2026 Page 11

CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT

FOR THE PERIOD OF
JULY 17, 2026 - JULY 30, 2026
FUND/CHECK #
00955442 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 215.16
00955444 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 311.38
00955445 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 74.69
00955450 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 311.38
00955451 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 74.69
00955459 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 74.69
00955460 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 74.69
00955463 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 74.69
00955469 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 74.69
00955475 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 192.69
00955476 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 311.38
00955477 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 311.38
00955479 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 311.38
00955481 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 192.69
00955487 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 74.69
00955489 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 74.69
00955495 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 405.65
00955497 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 311.38
00955499 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 192.69
00955503 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 709.38
00955505 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 74.69
00955507 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 218.00
00955508 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 311.38
00955509 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 74.69
00955512 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 311.38
00955515 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 74.69
00955516 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 74.69
00955517 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 311.38
00955520 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 74.69
00955525 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 311.38
00955528 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 74.69
00955533 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 74.69
00955536 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 311.38
00955544 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 70.00
00955547 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 74.69
00955553 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 220.00
00955554 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 387.54
00955558 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 74.69
00955565 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 311.38
00955568 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 74.69
00955570 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 311.38
579 Post Retirement Medical-Mgmt Fund
Non Departmental
00426555 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 74.69
00426560 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 547.38
00426562 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 74.69
00426565 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 74.69
00426573 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 427.38
Finance Accounting
Prepared by: L. Reyes
07/30/2026 August 11, 2026 Page 12

CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT

FOR THE PERIOD OF
JULY 17, 2026 - JULY 30, 2026
FUND/CHECK #
00426577 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 473.38
00426579 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 547.38
00955384 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 311.38
00955391 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 547.38
00955392 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 547.38
00955395 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 551.38
00955397 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 74.69
00955399 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 132.69
00955408 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 311.38
00955412 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 311.38
00955414 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 74.00
00955415 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 547.38
00955418 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 318.58
00955419 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 311.38
00955420 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 473.38
00955421 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 311.38
00955423 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 427.38
00955436 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 311.38
00955437 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 311.38
00955439 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 311.38
00955443 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 220.00
00955447 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 473.38
00955448 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 311.38
00955449 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 311.38
00955456 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 400.00
00955458 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 311.38
00955461 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 311.38
00955468 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 311.38
00955470 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 473.38
00955472 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 311.38
00955473 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 311.38
00955474 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 311.38
00955485 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 311.38
00955498 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 427.38
00955501 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 311.38
00955502 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 74.69
00955519 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 311.38
00955521 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 74.69
00955522 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 132.69
00955523 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 470.60
00955524 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 192.69
00955530 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 311.38
00955531 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 311.38
00955532 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 74.69
00955534 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 503.50
00955535 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 503.50
00955539 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 427.38
00955543 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 399.61
Finance Accounting
Prepared by: L. Reyes
07/30/2026 August 11, 2026 Page 13

CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT

FOR THE PERIOD OF
JULY 17, 2026 - JULY 30, 2026
FUND/CHECK #
00955546 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 74.69
00955548 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 547.38
00955551 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 110.00
00955555 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 547.38
00955557 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 74.69
00955559 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 311.38
00955560 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 311.38
00955563 RETIREE MEDICAL AFTER RETIREMENT 74.69
580 Loss Control Fund
Human Resources
00426419 MUNICIPAL POOLING AUTHORITY PAYROLL 3,713,510 .00 611 Water Fund
Non departmental
00426517 HOME DEPOT, THE WATER 549.35
00955332 HAMMONS SUPPLY COMPANY LLC JANITORIAL SUPPLI ES 1,658.71 00955377 W.W. GRAINGER INC SUPPLIES 995.58
Water Supervision
00426412 MAHARAJ, DUSHYANT REF BACKFLOW DOM FEE 724.00
00426419 MUNICIPAL POOLING AUTHORITY PAYROLL 936,426.3 7 00426506 FIRE RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES PAYROLL 93.12
Water Production
00426347 ALL WEST EQUIPMENT COMPANY PARTS 23,048.42
00426349 ANIMAL DAMAGE MANAGEMENT PEST CONTROL 275.00
00426362 CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 CLEANING SUPPLIES 87 .60 00426365 CLEAN LAKES INC RESERVOIR TREATMENT 37,931.57
00426377 CONTRA COSTA WATER DISTRICT MAIN CANAL 1,005, 838.89 00426380 DATUM BLUE INC FLOW METERS 3,946.00
00426396 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS LLC FITTINGS 4 ,772.02 00426403 JR SANITATION RENTALS INC. PORTABLE BATHROOM RENTAL 320.00 00426433 REINHOLDT, DARIN JAMES UST REPAIR 5,792.00
00426441 STAN'S HARDWARE LLC PARTS 20.71
00426457 VEOLIA WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC PARTS 37,563.36
00426466 ALL WEST EQUIPMENT COMPANY REPLACEMENT PARTS -LABOR 1,958.06 00426470 ANTONIAZZI, AUSTIN WALTER EXPENSE REIMBURSEM ENT 936.17 00426471 ANTONIAZZI, AUSTIN WALTER SAFETY SHOES-ANTON IAZZI, A 348.44 00426481 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES COPIER LEASE 351.08
00426485 CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 CLEANING SUPPLIES 35 0.40 00426494 CONTRA COSTA WATER DISTRICT LONE TREE WAY 122 ,527.07 00426502 DREAM RIDE ELEVATOR JUNE SERVICE 200.00
00426507 FISHER SCIENTIFIC COMPANY LAB SUPPLIES 481.43
00426515 HD SUPPLY INC CHEMICAL REAGANT SET 1,074.54
00426517 HOME DEPOT, THE PIPE SUPPLIES 269.27
00426518 INDUSTRIAL SOLUTIONS SERVICES INC CHEMICALS 8 ,062.95 00955323 CHEMTRADE CHEMICALS US LLC CHEMICALS 17,292.8 7 00955327 EUROFINS DRINKING WTR & WW WEST TESTING 2,639 .00 00955331 HACH CO PARTS 5,499.88
00955348 UNIVAR SOLUTIONS USA INC CHEMICALS 33,525.97
00955352 CHEMTRADE CHEMICALS US LLC CHEMICALS 11,799.9 0 Finance Accounting
Prepared by: L. Reyes
07/30/2026 August 11, 2026 Page 14

CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT

FOR THE PERIOD OF
JULY 17, 2026 - JULY 30, 2026
FUND/CHECK #
00955356 DELL COMPUTER CORP CAMERA REPLACEMENT 2,788.3 2 00955357 DKF SOLUTIONS GROUP LLC TRAINING 3,607.20
00955358 DUBOIS CHEMICALS INC CHEMICALS 16,017.79
00955375 UNIVAR SOLUTIONS USA INC CHEMICALS 33,781.18
00955376 VOIP SUPPLY LLC HARDWARE DEVICE 1,219.67
00955377 W.W. GRAINGER INC PARTS 6,762.11
Water Distribution
00426393 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION CO EZ STREET 4,875.95
00426400 ISINGS CULLIGAN WATER CONDITIONING HOT/COLD SERVICE 12.90 00426454 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC UTILITY PAYMENT SYSTE M 74,884.85 00426461 WHITE CAP LP PARTS 2,167.58
00426480 C & J FAVALORA TRUCKING INC FULTON RECYCLE 31 ,427.50 00426498 CWEA SFBS MRHODES CWEA MEM RENEW 259.00
00426506 FIRE RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES PAYROLL 209.10
00426517 HOME DEPOT, THE WATER 643.23
00955354 CORE & MAIN LP METER COUPLINGS 894.67
00955357 DKF SOLUTIONS GROUP LLC TRAINING 3,607.20
00955361 INFOSEND INC PRINT & MAIL SERVICES 13,456.50
Public Buildings & Facilities
00426351 BAY AREA AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DIST ANNUAL PERMIT RENEWAL 1,314.00 00955322 CAROLLO ENGINEERS INC PROFESSIONAL SVCS 21,98 8.50 612 Water System Improvement Fund
Water Systems
00426412 MAHARAJ, DUSHYANT WATER METER FEE 10,754.33
621 Sewer Fund
Swr-Wastewater Administration
00426359 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES CONTRACT LEASE 74.14
00426393 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION CO EZ STREET 4,875.94
00426400 ISINGS CULLIGAN WATER CONDITIONING HOT/COLD SERVICE 12.90 00426419 MUNICIPAL POOLING AUTHORITY PAYROLL 288,285.3 7 00426454 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC UTILITY PAYMENT SYSTE M 74,884.84 00426480 C & J FAVALORA TRUCKING INC FULTON RECYCLE 31 ,427.50 00426506 FIRE RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES PAYROLL 233.27
00955351 BADGER METER INC SMART COVER MAINTENANCE 16,2 87.00 00955357 DKF SOLUTIONS GROUP LLC TRAINING 3,607.20
00955361 INFOSEND INC MASSIVE MAILING SVCS 44,830.97
Wastewater Collection
00426553 WOODARD & CURRAN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5,145 .00 631 Marina Fund
Non departmental
00426519 KILIMNIK, VLADIMIR DEPOSIT REFUND 180.00
Marina Administration
00426419 MUNICIPAL POOLING AUTHORITY PAYROLL 45,561.34
00426444 STATE OF CALIFORNIA PAYROLL 89,025.00
755 Fire Protection Fund
Non departmental
00426412 MAHARAJ, DUSHYANT REF FIRE PROT RESID FEE 951 .00 Finance Accounting
Prepared by: L. Reyes
07/30/2026 August 11, 2026 Page 15

CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT

FOR THE PERIOD OF
JULY 17, 2026 - JULY 30, 2026
FUND/CHECK #
Finance Accounting
Prepared by: L. Reyes
07/30/2026 August 11, 2026 Page 16

CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT

FOR THE PERIOD OF
JULY 17, 2026 - JULY 30, 2026
FUND/CHECK #
Finance Accounting
Prepared by: L. Reyes
07/30/2026 August 11, 2026 Page 17

CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT

FOR THE PERIOD OF
JULY 17, 2026 - JULY 30, 2026
FUND/CHECK #
Finance Accounting
Prepared by: L. Reyes
07/30/2026 August 11, 2026 Page 18

CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT

FOR THE PERIOD OF
JULY 17, 2026 - JULY 30, 2026
FUND/CHECK #
Finance Accounting
Prepared by: L. Reyes
07/30/2026 August 11, 2026 Page 19

CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT

FOR THE PERIOD OF
JULY 17, 2026 - JULY 30, 2026
FUND/CHECK #
Finance Accounting
Prepared by: L. Reyes
07/30/2026 August 11, 2026 Page 20

CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT

FOR THE PERIOD OF
JULY 17, 2026 - JULY 30, 2026
FUND/CHECK #
Finance Accounting
Prepared by: L. Reyes
07/30/2026 August 11, 2026 Page 21
227 Housing Fund
Housing
00426492 CONTRA COSTA CRISIS CENTER Q4 FY25-26 - CCCC - REIM 2,392.20 In accordance with Antioch Municipal Code §3-2.01 regarding Warrants, the issued checks in this report have been certified by the Finance Director to be in conformance with the City's approved budget and are being presented to City Council for ratification and approval.

CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT

FOR THE PERIOD OF
JULY 17, 2026 - JULY 30, 2026
FUND/CHECK #

AS HOUSING SUCCESSOR TO THE ANTIOCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Finance Accounting
Prepared by: L. Reyes
07/30/2026 August, 11, 2026 Page 1

CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT

FOR THE PERIOD OF
JULY 17, 2026 - JULY 30, 2026
FUND/CHECK #

AS HOUSING SUCCESSOR TO THE ANTIOCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Finance Accounting
Prepared by: L. Reyes
07/30/2026 August, 11, 2026 Page 2

CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT

FOR THE PERIOD OF
JULY 17, 2026 - JULY 30, 2026
FUND/CHECK #

AS HOUSING SUCCESSOR TO THE ANTIOCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Finance Accounting
Prepared by: L. Reyes
07/30/2026 August, 11, 2026 Page 3

CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT

FOR THE PERIOD OF
JULY 17, 2026 - JULY 30, 2026
FUND/CHECK #

AS HOUSING SUCCESSOR TO THE ANTIOCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Finance Accounting
Prepared by: L. Reyes
07/30/2026 August, 11, 2026 Page 4

CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT

FOR THE PERIOD OF
JULY 17, 2026 - JULY 30, 2026
FUND/CHECK #

AS HOUSING SUCCESSOR TO THE ANTIOCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Finance Accounting
Prepared by: L. Reyes
07/30/2026 August, 11, 2026 Page 5

CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT

FOR THE PERIOD OF
JULY 17, 2026 - JULY 30, 2026
FUND/CHECK #

AS HOUSING SUCCESSOR TO THE ANTIOCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Finance Accounting
Prepared by: L. Reyes
07/30/2026 August, 11, 2026 Page 6

CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT

FOR THE PERIOD OF
JULY 17, 2026 - JULY 30, 2026
FUND/CHECK #

AS HOUSING SUCCESSOR TO THE ANTIOCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Finance Accounting
Prepared by: L. Reyes
07/30/2026 August, 11, 2026 Page 7

CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT

FOR THE PERIOD OF
JULY 17, 2026 - JULY 30, 2026
FUND/CHECK #

AS HOUSING SUCCESSOR TO THE ANTIOCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Finance Accounting
Prepared by: L. Reyes
07/30/2026 August, 11, 2026 Page 8

CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT

FOR THE PERIOD OF
JULY 17, 2026 - JULY 30, 2026
FUND/CHECK #

AS HOUSING SUCCESSOR TO THE ANTIOCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Finance Accounting
Prepared by: L. Reyes
07/30/2026 August, 11, 2026 Page 9

CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT

FOR THE PERIOD OF
JULY 17, 2026 - JULY 30, 2026
FUND/CHECK #

AS HOUSING SUCCESSOR TO THE ANTIOCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Finance Accounting
Prepared by: L. Reyes
07/30/2026 August, 11, 2026 Page 10

CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT

FOR THE PERIOD OF
JULY 17, 2026 - JULY 30, 2026
FUND/CHECK #

AS HOUSING SUCCESSOR TO THE ANTIOCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Finance Accounting
Prepared by: L. Reyes
07/30/2026 August, 11, 2026 Page 11

CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT

FOR THE PERIOD OF
JULY 17, 2026 - JULY 30, 2026
FUND/CHECK #

AS HOUSING SUCCESSOR TO THE ANTIOCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Finance Accounting
Prepared by: L. Reyes
07/30/2026 August, 11, 2026 Page 12

CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT

FOR THE PERIOD OF
JULY 17, 2026 - JULY 30, 2026
FUND/CHECK #

AS HOUSING SUCCESSOR TO THE ANTIOCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Finance Accounting
Prepared by: L. Reyes
07/30/2026 August, 11, 2026 Page 13

CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT

FOR THE PERIOD OF
JULY 17, 2026 - JULY 30, 2026
FUND/CHECK #

AS HOUSING SUCCESSOR TO THE ANTIOCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Finance Accounting
Prepared by: L. Reyes
07/30/2026 August, 11, 2026 Page 14

CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT

FOR THE PERIOD OF
JULY 17, 2026 - JULY 30, 2026
FUND/CHECK #

AS HOUSING SUCCESSOR TO THE ANTIOCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Finance Accounting
Prepared by: L. Reyes
07/30/2026 August, 11, 2026 Page 15

CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT

FOR THE PERIOD OF
JULY 17, 2026 - JULY 30, 2026
FUND/CHECK #

AS HOUSING SUCCESSOR TO THE ANTIOCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Finance Accounting
Prepared by: L. Reyes
07/30/2026 August, 11, 2026 Page 16

CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT

FOR THE PERIOD OF
JULY 17, 2026 - JULY 30, 2026
FUND/CHECK #

AS HOUSING SUCCESSOR TO THE ANTIOCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Finance Accounting
Prepared by: L. Reyes
07/30/2026 August, 11, 2026 Page 17

CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT

FOR THE PERIOD OF
JULY 17, 2026 - JULY 30, 2026
FUND/CHECK #

AS HOUSING SUCCESSOR TO THE ANTIOCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Finance Accounting
Prepared by: L. Reyes
07/30/2026 August, 11, 2026 Page 18

CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT

FOR THE PERIOD OF
JULY 17, 2026 - JULY 30, 2026
FUND/CHECK #

AS HOUSING SUCCESSOR TO THE ANTIOCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Finance Accounting
Prepared by: L. Reyes
07/30/2026 August, 11, 2026 Page 19

CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT

FOR THE PERIOD OF
JULY 17, 2026 - JULY 30, 2026
FUND/CHECK #

AS HOUSING SUCCESSOR TO THE ANTIOCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Finance Accounting
Prepared by: L. Reyes
07/30/2026 August, 11, 2026 Page 20

CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT

FOR THE PERIOD OF
JULY 17, 2026 - JULY 30, 2026
FUND/CHECK #

AS HOUSING SUCCESSOR TO THE ANTIOCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Finance Accounting
Prepared by: L. Reyes
07/30/2026 August, 11, 2026 Page 21

CLAIMS BY FUND REPORT

FOR THE PERIOD OF
JULY 17, 2026 - JULY 30, 2026
FUND/CHECK #

AS HOUSING SUCCESSOR TO THE ANTIOCH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Finance Accounting
Prepared by: L. Reyes
07/30/2026 August, 11, 2026 Page 22

STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

DATE: Regular Meeting of August 11, 2026

TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
SUBMITTED BY: Lori Asuncion, City Attorney
SUBJECT: REJECTION OF CLAIMS: KYLE SMITH, ANA DE MORENO,

AND JOSHUA MORRIS

RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council reject the claims submitted by KYLE SMITH, ANA DE MORENO, and JOSHUA MORRIS.

Should the City Council desire to discuss this matter, it would be scheduled for a future closed session.

ATTACHMENTS
None.

E
Agenda Item #

F
Agenda Item #

STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

DATE: Regular Meeting of August 11, 2026

TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council

SUBMITTED BY: Bill Whitaker, Police Lieutenant

APPROVED BY: Desmond Bittner, Acting Police Chief

SUBJECT: Five-Year Agreement with Verkada, Inc. for Police Department Cameras including Hardware and Software Services

RECOMMENDED ACTION

It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution:

1. Approving a five- year agreement with Verkada/ Development Group Inc . in the amount of $381,676.22 to purchase police department cameras, hardware and cloud-based operating system software for a five -year period from September 1, 2026, to September 1, 2031; and

2. Authorizing a fiscal year 2026- 27 budget amendment to roll over the FY 2025- 26 Police Department General Fund budget to the FY 26/27 budget; and

3. Authorizing the Acting City Manager to execute an agreement with Verkada/DGI not to exceed $381,676.22 over the five-year period; and

4. Authorizing the Acting City Manager to take any and all necessary and appropriate actions to carry out the purpose and intent of the resolution.

FISCAL IMPACT

The cost of the five-year contract, $381,676.22, is to be paid upfront in fiscal year 2026- 27, with an average cost of $76,335.24 per year.

1. Year one cost - $381,676.22

2. Year two cost - $0

3. Year three cost - $0

4. Year four cost - $0
Antioch City Council Report
August 11, 2026 Agenda Item #F 2

5. Year five cost - $0

The amount of the contract was fully funded through the fiscal year 2025- 26 Police Department General Fund budget and needs to be rolled over to the 2026- 27 budget, requiring a budget amendment.

BACKGROUND

The Antioch Police Department's existing Bay Alarm video surveillance system has reached the end of its useful life and is no longer capable of providing the level of security, reliability, and functionality required to support daily police operations. The system was originally designed as a 12- server, on-premises video management platform; however, eight of the twelve servers have failed and are no longer operational. As a result, the system has experienced a significant reduction in performance, reliability, and recording capability, creating substantial vulnerabilities in the Department's security infrastructure.

In addition to the server failures, much of the existing surveillance hardware has deteriorated due to age and prolonged use. Numerous cameras have exposed wiring, increasing the likelihood of equipment failure and presenting maintenance and safety concerns. The video intercom systems located at secure entrances, public access doors, and vehicle gates are also malfunctioning and no longer provide dependable communication or ac cess control. These failures negatively impact the Department's ability to monitor facilities, control access, and maintain a secure environment for employees, visitors, and members of the public.

The Bay Alarm video management software and supporting platform are also obsolete and have exceeded their serviceable life. Replacement components are increasingly difficult to obtain, manufacturer support is limited or unavailable, and the system is no longer capable of supporting current security technologies or operational requirements.

Due to the age and condition of both the hardware and software, continued repairs are no longer practical or cost-effective. The system is beyond repair and requires complete replacement with a modern, reliable video surveillance solution that provides enhanced security, improved operational efficiency, and long-term sustainability.

DISCUSSION

Verkada Inc. (“Verkada”) has built a unique end-to-end, cloud-managed security platform for monitoring and managing physical security. The Verkada integrated platform offers comprehensive solutions across video security (cameras), access control (door controllers and readers), environmental sensors (air quality monitoring), alarms (wired and wireless sensors, wired alarm panel, and wireless hub, as well as packaged monitoring offerings), visitor management, mailroom management, and video door intercoms.

This platform includes a number of unique features, such as up to 365 days of continuous on-camera storage, a full range of indoor and outdoor cameras with night vision (dome, mini, bullet, split, and fisheye models), infrared LED isolation on 4K dome camera models, an offline mode that allows a user to view live streams via a viewing station even in the event of an Internet outage, and security screens for visitors. Verkada provides native integration across all those applications, including security cameras, access control, Antioch City Council Report
August 11, 2026 Agenda Item #F 3
environmental sensors, alarms, visitor management, mailroom management, and video intercoms.

Verkada is the only manufacturer of cloud-managed physical security solutions with all those features. These products are designed, manufactured, and sold exclusively by Verkada who holds various intellectual property rights in and to its products.

Switching to Verkada provides a modern, scalable security platform that better aligns with current and future operational needs. Verkada’s cloud-managed system consolidates video surveillance, access control, and system management into a single, intuitive interface, reducing complexity and administrative overhead. This transition improves system reliability, simplifies maintenance, and ensures consistent performance across all deployed devices while allowing authorized personnel to securely access and manage the system from anywhere.

A key advantage of Verkada is its ability to expand seamlessly as needs evolve.

Additional cameras, access control devices, or sensors can be added incrementally without requiring a full system replacement or major infrastructure changes. This modular approach allows the organizati on to respond to growth, new facilities, or emerging security requirements on an as-needed basis, ensuring resources are allocated efficiently while avoiding unnecessary upfront costs.

Overall, adopting Verkada represents a future-proof investment in a flexible and scalable security solution. The platform’s ease of expansion, centralized management, and ongoing software updates ensure long-term value while supporting operational continuity.

By moving to Verkada, the organization gains a system that can grow alongside its mission, adapting to changing demands without disruption or redundancy.

Staff recommends the selection of Verkada/DGI under the sole source provisions of the Antioch Municipal Code (2-1-103) due to the unique and exclusive features that align with current operational needs detailed above.

ATTACHMENTS

A: Resolution
Exhibit 1: Verkada/DGI - Quotes

ATTACHMENT “A”

RESOLUTION NO. 2026/**

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANTIOCH

AUTHORIZING A SOLE SOURCE CONTRACT, AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 BUDGET, AND AUTHORIZING THE ACTING CITY MANAGER TO

EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH VERKADA/DGI FOR THE PURCHASE OF CITY

CAMERAS AND RELATED HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $381,676.22.

WHEREAS, the City has a responsibility to protect public facilities, critical infrastructure, employees, residents, and visitors; and

WHEREAS, modern video security systems enhance public safety, assist in investigations, deter criminal activity, and support emergency response efforts; and

WHEREAS, the City has evaluated its existing video surveillance infrastructure and determined that an upgraded, centrally managed system is necessary to meet current and future security needs; and

WHEREAS, Verkada/DGI provides an integrated video security platform utilizing network-connected cameras and secure cloud-based video storage, enabling real-time monitoring, efficient evidence retrieval, system scalability, and reduced on-premises hardware requirements; and

WHEREAS, cloud-based video storage offers redundancy, reliability, disaster recovery, and secure access controls consistent with industry standards and best practices; and

WHEREAS, the use of Verkada/DGI cameras and cloud services will improve operational efficiency while maintaining appropriate safeguards for data security, access control, and privacy; and

WHEREAS, staff is recommending the selection of Verkada/DGI under the sole source provisions of the Antioch Municipal Code (2-1-103) due to the unique and exclusive features of the security platform; and

WHEREAS, the purchase of cameras and related software was included in the fiscal year 2025-26 Police Department General Fund budget and needs to be re- appropriated to fiscal year 2026-27 to complete the purchase.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Antioch as follows:

1. A sole source contract per Antioch Municipal Code (2-3-103) with Verkada/DGI hardware and software packages for standardized equipment for police department cameras in the amount of $381,676.22 is approved.

RESOLUTION NO. 2026/***
August 11, 2026

Page 2 ends

2. The Acting City Manager is authorized to amend the General Fund Budget and transfer $381,676 from the Police Department General Fund budget FY 25/26 to FY 26/27.

3. The Acting City Manager or designee is authorized to execute an agreement with Verkada/DGI in an amount not to exceed $381,676.22 over a five-year period from September 1, 2026, to September 1, 2031.

4. The Acting City Manager is authorized to take any and all necessary and appropriate actions to carry out the purpose and intent of the resolution.

* * * * * * *

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Antioch, at a special meeting thereof, held on the 11th day of August 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

_________________________________________
MICHAEL J. MANDY

CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANTIOCH
Company:

CITYOFANTIOCH
Description:

PD
-
Verkada
Cameras
and
Intercoms
Proposal#39541

Bill
To:

THIRD
&
H
STS

ANTIOCH,
CA
94509
Ship
To:

THIRD
&
H
STS

ANTIOCH,
CA
94509
Sold
To:

THIRD
&
H
STS

ANTIOCH,
CA
94509
Created:
6/24/2026
Expires:
7/24/2026
Version:
1 Account
Manager:
joravez
Systems
Engineer:
tjenkins
Payment
Terms:

Net
30 Product
&
Manufacturer
Maintenance
Line
No
Qty
Product
Unit
Price
Ext'd
Price
Tax
1 3
CY63-3TBE-HW
CY63-E
Outdoor
Two-Camera
Multisensor
Camera,
3TB,
90 Days
Max
4,499.40
13,498.20
T
2 3
LIC-CAM-MLT2-5Y-CAP
Verkada
5-Year
Two-Camera
Multisensor
License,
Capacity
Increase
1,199.40
3,598.20
T
3 10
ACC-MNT-ARM-1
Arm
Mount

77.40 774.00
T
4 3
ACC-MNT-YPEND-1
Verkada
Two-Camera
Multisensor
Pendant
Cap

77.40 232.20
T
5 7
CD63-2TB-HW
VerkadaCD63IndoorDomeCamera,4K,ZoomLens,2TBofStorage,Maximum90DaysofRetention 3,419.40
23,935.80
T
6 40
LIC-CAM-5Y-CAP
5-YearCameraLicense,CapacityIncrease
659.40
26,376.00
T
7 5
ACC-MNT-PEND-1
Verkada
Pendant
Cap
Mount

47.40 237.00
T
8 4
CP63-3TBE-HW
Verkada
CP63
Outdoor
PTZ
Camera,
4K,
3TB
of
Storage,
Maximum
90 Days
of
Retention
5,819.40 23,277.60 T
9 4
ACC-MNT-XLARM-1
Verkada
Large
Arm
Mount
(PTZ)
113.40
453.60
T
10 3
ACC-POE-90W-NA
Indoor90WPoE++(802.3bt-2018)Injector,GigE,NATypeB
152.10
456.30
T
11 3
ACC-MNT-POLE-1
Pole
Mount
149.40 448.20 T
12 19
CD53-768E-HWCD53-EOutdoorDomeCamera,768GB,90DaysMax
1,919.40
36,468.60
T
13 3
ACC-MNT-CJBOX-1
Circle
Junction
Box
Mount

77.40 232.20 T
14 9
CD63-2TB-HW 3,419.40 30,774.60 T
Verkada
CD63
Indoor
Dome
Camera,
4K,
Zoom
Lens,
2TB
of
Storage,
Maximum
90 Days
of
Retention
15 1
CD53-768E-HW
CD53-E
Outdoor
Dome
Camera,
768GB,
90 Days
Max
1,919.40 1,919.40 T
16 2
ACC-MNT-LBRAC-1
Verkada
L-Bracket
Mount

95.40 190.80
T
17 1
ACC-MNT-SJBOX-1SquareJunctionBoxMount

65.40 65.40
T
18 2
CH63-6TBE-HW
Verkada
CH63-E
Outdoor
Four-Camera
Multisensor
Camera,
4x4K,
Zoom
Lens,
6TB
of
Storage,
Maximum
90 Days
of
Retention
8,219.40
16,438.80
T
19 2
LIC-CAM-MLT4-5Y-CAP
Verkada
5-Year
Four-Camera
Multisensor
License,
Capacity
Increase
1,949.40
3,898.80
T
20 2
ACC-MNT-HPEND-1
Four-Camera
Multisensor
Pendant
Cap
Mount

95.40 190.80
T
21 2
GC31-E-HW
GC31
Cellular
Gateway,
Outdoor
959.40
1,918.80
T
22 2
LIC-GC-5Y-CAP
Verkada
5-Year
Cellular
Gateway
License,
Capacity
Increase
959.40
1,918.80
T
23 2
ACC-POE-90W-E-NA
Outdoor
90W
PoE
(802.3bt-2018)
Injector,
GigE,
NA
Type
B
269.10
538.20
T
24 5
TD53-HW
Verkada
TD53
Video
Intercom
Reader
1,199.40
5,997.00
T
25 5
LIC-TD-5Y-CAP
Verkada
5-Year
Intercom
License,
Capacity
Increase
1,199.40
5,997.00
T
26 1
ACC-INT-ANGLE-2
TD53
Angle
Mount
239.40
239.40
T
27 4
ACC-INT-HOOD-1
Intercom
Rain
Hood

29.40 117.60
T
28 1
ACC-INT-COND-2
Intercom
Conduit
Mount
239.40
239.40
T
29 2
ACC-EV3-1
Verkada
Desfire
EV3
Encrypted
Cards
-
Pack
of
100
479.40
958.80
T
30 1
LABOR
Installation
57,426.80
57,426.80
31 1

CABLINGPRODUCT

CABLING

PRODUCT
5,375.00 5,375.00 T

Needmoretimetogetimportantstuffdone?Askusabout
Subtotal $264,193.30

Handling $0.00
EstimatedSalesTax(9.75%) $20,159.73
ProfessionalServices $14,206.69
Shipping $1,338.00
Total $299,897.72

Company:

CITYOFANTIOCH
Description:

PD
-
Verkada
Cameras
and
Intercoms
Proposal#39541
AboutSalesTax
ItemssoldbyDevelopmentGroup,Inc.("DGI")andshippedtodestinationsinCaliforniaaresubjecttosalestax. Ifanitemissubjecttosalestaxinthestatetowhichtheorderisshipped,taxisgenerallycalculatedonthetotalsellingpriceofeachindividualitem.Inaccordancewithstatetaxlaws,thetotalsellingpriceofanorderwillgenerallyincludeshippingandhandlingchargesanditem-leveldiscounts.Theamountoftaxchargedonyourorderwilldependuponmanyfactorsincluding,butnotlimitedto,thetypeofitem(s)purchased,andthesourceanddestinationoftheshipment.Factorscanchangebetweenthetimeyouplaceanorderandthetimeandinvoiceissent,whichcouldaffectthecalculationofsalestaxes.Theamount appearing
on
your
proposal
as
'Estimated
Sales
Tax'
may
differ
from
the
sales
taxes
ultimately
charged.

AboutProductReturns
DevelopmentGroup,Inc.("DGI")onlyacceptsthereturnofProducts(a)thatDGIhastherighttoreturntotheapplicablemanufacturersorsuppliers,(b)forwhichDGIreceivesyourwrittenrequestforreturnwithinFOURTEEN(14)DAYSfromthedateoftheinvoiceforsuchProducts,and(c)thatarefactorysealedinfullyresalableconditionorwhichareDeadonArrival("DoA").ExceptforProductsreturnedbecausetheyaredefectiveorDoA,tobeeligibleforreturn,Productsmustbeinresalablecondition,complete,unusedandunopened,withtheoutersealintact.Productsthatdonotmeettheseconditionsarenoteligible for
return
and
will
be
returned
to
you.

Eligible
Product
returns
will
receive
a
credit
that
will
be
issued
at
the
original
purchase
price
that
you
paid
for
the
Product
only
if
your
account
is
current.

DGI
may
return
toyou,anyProductnotauthorizedforreturn(an"UnauthorizedReturn")atyourexpense,orDGImay,atitssolediscretion,issueacreditforthecurrentpriceoftheProduct,lessathirtypercent(30%)restockingfee.DGIisnotliableforanylossordamagetoUnauthorizedReturns.

Company&PaymentInformation
MailingAddress
Development
Group,
Inc.

POBox991484
Redding,
CA
96099-1484
Phone:
(530)
229-0071
Fax:
(530)
248-3415
OfficeLocations
Development
Group,
Inc.
6704LockheedDr
Redding,
CA
96002

PaymentInformation
Development
Group,
Inc.
32880
Collections
Center
Dr
Chicago,
IL
60693
Federal
Tax
ID:
26-3740919
WireTransferInformation
Domestic
Wire
Transfer
(U.S.)
Wire
Routing
Transit
Number
(RTN):
026009593
Bank
Name:

Bank
of
America
City,
State:

Chicago,
IL
AccountNumber:8188065595TitleofAccount:DEVELOPMENTGROUPINC ACHInformation
ACH
Transfer
(U.S.)
Routing
Transit
Number
(RTN):
071000039
Bank
Name:

Bank
of
America
City,
State:

Chicago,
IL
AccountNumber:8188065595TitleofAccount:DEVELOPMENTGROUPINC Note:

All
wire
transfers
must
be
made
in
US
Dollars

Company:

CITYOFANTIOCH
Description:

PD
-
Animal
Shelter
-
Verkada
Cameras
Proposal#39545

Bill
To:

THIRD
&
H
STS

ANTIOCH,
CA
94509
Ship
To:

THIRD
&
H
STS

ANTIOCH,
CA
94509
Sold
To:

THIRD
&
H
STS

ANTIOCH,
CA
94509
Created:
6/24/2026
Expires:
7/24/2026
Version:
1 Account
Manager:
joravez
Systems
Engineer:
tjenkins
Payment
Terms:

Net
30 Product
&
Manufacturer
Maintenance
Line
No
Qty
Product
Unit
Price
Ext'd
Price
Tax
1 5
CH63-6TBE-HW
Verkada
CH63-E
Outdoor
Four-Camera
Multisensor
Camera,
4x4K,
Zoom
Lens,
6TB
of
Storage,
Maximum
90 Days
of
Retention
8,219.40
41,097.00
T
2 1
CD63-2TB-HW
Verkada
CD63
Indoor
Dome
Camera,
4K,
Zoom
Lens,
2TB
of
Storage,
Maximum
90 Days
of
Retention
3,419.40
3,419.40
T
3 5
LIC-CAM-MLT4-5Y-CAP
Verkada
5-Year
Four-Camera
Multisensor
License,
Capacity
Increase
1,949.40
9,747.00
T
4 1
LIC-CAM-5Y-CAP
5-Year
Camera
License,
Capacity
Increase
659.40
659.40
T
5 5
ACC-MNT-HPEND-1
Four-CameraMultisensorPendantCapMount

95.40 477.00
T
6 5
ACC-MNT-ARM-1
ArmMount

77.40 387.00
T
7 4
ACC-MNT-CORNER-1
Verkada
Corner
Mount
137.40
549.60
T
8 1
ACC-MNT-CJBOX-1
Circle
Junction
Box

77.40 77.40 T
9 5
ACC-POE-90W-NA
Indoor
90W
PoE++
(802.3bt-2018)
Injector,
GigE,
NA
Type
B
152.10
760.50
T
10 1
LABORLaborServices
15,739.20
15,739.20
11 1

CABLINGPRODUCT

CABLINGPRODUCT
500.00
500.00
T

Needmoretimetogetimportantstuffdone?Askusabout
Subtotal
$73,413.50
Handling
$0.00

Estimated
Sales
Tax
(9.75%)
$5,623.24
ProfessionalServices $2,398.76
Shipping
$343.00
Total $81,778.50

Company:

CITYOFANTIOCH
Description:

PD
-
Animal
Shelter
-
Verkada
Cameras
Proposal#39545
AboutSalesTax
ItemssoldbyDevelopmentGroup,Inc.("DGI")andshippedtodestinationsinCaliforniaaresubjecttosalestax. Ifanitemissubjecttosalestaxinthestatetowhichtheorderisshipped,taxisgenerallycalculatedonthetotalsellingpriceofeachindividualitem.Inaccordancewithstatetaxlaws,thetotalsellingpriceofanorderwillgenerallyincludeshippingandhandlingchargesanditem-leveldiscounts.Theamountoftaxchargedonyourorderwilldependuponmanyfactorsincluding,butnotlimitedto,thetypeofitem(s)purchased,andthesourceanddestinationoftheshipment.Factorscanchangebetweenthetimeyouplaceanorderandthetimeandinvoiceissent,whichcouldaffectthecalculationofsalestaxes.Theamount appearing
on
your
proposal
as
'Estimated
Sales
Tax'
may
differ
from
the
sales
taxes
ultimately
charged.

Eligible
Product
returns
will
receive
a
credit
that
will
be
issued
at
the
original
purchase
price
that
you
paid
for
the
Product
only
if
your
account
is
current.

Company&PaymentInformation
MailingAddress
Development
Group,
Inc.

POBox991484
Redding,
CA
96099-1484
Phone:
(530)
229-0071
Fax:
(530)
248-3415
OfficeLocations
Development
Group,
Inc.
6704LockheedDr
Redding,
CA
96002

Bank
of
America
City,
State:

Chicago,
IL
AccountNumber:8188065595TitleofAccount:DEVELOPMENTGROUPINC ACHInformation
ACH
Transfer
(U.S.)
Routing
Transit
Number
(RTN):
071000039
Bank
Name:

Bank
of
America
City,
State:

Chicago,
IL
AccountNumber:8188065595TitleofAccount:DEVELOPMENTGROUPINC Note:

All
wire
transfers
must
be
made
in
US
Dollars

Agenda Item #

STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

DATE: Regular Meeting of August 11, 2026

TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council

SUBMITTED BY: Dawn Merchant, Finance Director

APPROVED BY: Ana Cortez, Acting City Manager AEC

SUBJECT: Sales Tax Citizens’ Oversight Committee Appointment for a full-term vacancy expiring March 2030

RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that the Mayor nominate the candidate for appointment and the City Council adopt a resolution approving the Mayor’s appointment of Christian Lapena to the Sales Tax Citizens’ Oversight Committee for a full-term vacancy expiring March 2030.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact as all positions are voluntary.

DISCUSSION
The Sales Tax Citizens’ Oversight Committee (Committee) is responsible for reviewing the receipt and expenditure of funds under Measure W as they relate to the Council’s stated priorities outlined in the adopted budgets of the City. The Committee is responsible for reporting out the result of their review by April 1st of each year at a public meeting.

The Committee consists of seven members who are Antioch residents. The terms of the Committee members are staggered with four members serving a 4-year term and 3 members serving a 2-year term. At least one member of the Committee shall have a financial, accounting or auditing background.

In general law cities where the office of mayor is an elective office pursuant to Article 5 (commencing with Section 34900) of Chapter 7 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 4, the mayor, with the approval of the city council, shall make all appointments to boards, commissions, and committees, unless otherwise specifically provided by statute. Under Antioch Municipal Code §2-5.201, the Mayor shall nominate candidates for membership on all boards and commissions. Nominees shall be appointed to each board and commission upon receiving approval of at least a majority vote of the City Council.

Currently, there are two full-term vacancies expiring March 2028 and three full-term vacancies expiring March 2030. The City Clerk’s Office advertised to fill the vacancies in

Antioch City Council Report
August 11, 2026 Agenda Item #6 2
the usual manner. The applicant was interviewed by Mayor Ron Bernal and Finance Director Dawn Merchant.

Mayor Bernal is nominating Christian Lapena for Council approval to fill one of the full- term vacancies expiring March 2030.

ATTACHMENTS
A. Resolution appointing Christian Lapena for a full-term vacancy expiring March 2030 B. Application

ATTACHMENT A
RESOLUTION NO. 2026/XX

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANTIOCH
APPOINTING CHRISTIAN LAPENA TO THE SALES TAX CITIZENS’ OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE FOR A FULL-TERM VACANCY EXPIRING MARCH 2030

WHEREAS, there are currently two full-term vacancies expiring March 2028 and three full-term vacancies expiring March 2030 on the Sales Tax Citizens’ Oversight Committee;

WHEREAS, the City Clerk’s Office announced the vacancy and accepted applications for these full-term vacancies;

WHEREAS, Mayor Ron Bernal considered the application received and interviewed the interested applicant;

WHEREAS, Antioch Municipal Code Section 2-5.201 requires the Mayor to nominate candidates for membership on all boards and commissions and requires nominees to receive approval of at least a majority vote of the City Council to be appointed to a board or commission; and

WHEREAS, Mayor Ron Bernal has nominated Christian Lapena to the Sales Tax Citizens’ Oversight Committee, full-term vacancy expiring March 2030.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Antioch hereby approves the Mayor’s appointment of Christian Lapena to serve on the Sales Tax Citizens’ Oversight Committee for a full-term vacancy, expiring March 2030.

* * * * * * * *

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Antioch at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 11th day of August 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

___________________________________
MICHAEL J. MANDY

CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANTIOCH

1. Motivation
● Antioch resident invested in how public funds are spent — particularly whether Measure W

dollars

are

being

allocated

voters

intended
● Founder of a local 501(c)(3) (Herpaderp Reptile Rescue) that competes for the same public

goodwill

this

tax

meant

generate

—

understand

community

accountability

firsthand
● Professionally focused on systems oversight and vendor/cost analysis; I want to apply that

same

rigor

public

spending

2. Financial/Accounting Background No formal accounting credentials, but relevant experience:

manage

annual

budget

and

financial

reporting

for

501(c)(3)

nonprofit,

evaluate

vendor

contracts

and

cost

structures

professionally

MSP/technology

consulting

capacity,

and

track

P&L

active

resale

business.

understand

financial

statements,

budget

variance,

and

cost

allocation

working

level.

3. Skills/Experience
● Technology and systems analysis background — comfortable reading financial reports, identifying

anomalies,

and

asking

the

right

questions

staff
● Nonprofit operations experience (compliance, grant reporting, budget management) ● Independent, detail-oriented — no financial or political conflicts of interest with city vendors

departments

4. Additional Info Antioch resident, founder of Herpaderp Reptile Rescue (est. 2022, 120+ animals,

active

volunteer

base).

I'm

aware

the

application

deadline

has

passed

and

respectfully

ask

that

this

submission

considered

given

the

pending

appointment

process.

7 Agenda Item

STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

DATE: Regular Meeting of August 11, 2026

TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council

SUBMITTED BY: Nicole Baptista, Senior Administrative Assistant

APPROVED BY: Ana Cortez, Acting City Manager
AEC

SUBJECT: Designation of a Voting Delegate and Alternate Delegate for the League of California Cities Annual Conference and Authorization for Associated Conference Expenses Not to Exceed $2, 600 per Participant.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council appoint a Voting Delegate and Alternate Delegate for the 2026 League of California Cities Annual Conference. It is further recommended that the Council authorize the associated conference expenses for one participant in an amount not to exceed $2,600.

FISCAL IMPACT
The League of California Cities Annual Conference is being held at the Anaheim Convention Center from September 23rd through the 25th. The registration, hotel, accommodations, and flight for one participant estimated total cost is $2,600 (registration, flight, per diem, and hotel accommodations). Amount is to come from the City Council Conferences/Dues Budget.

DISCUSSION

The League’s 2026 Annual Conference is scheduled for September 23rd through the 25th at the Anaheim Convention Center. An important part of the Annual Conference is the Annual Business Meeting (during the General Assembly), scheduled for September 25, 2026. At that meeting the league membership considers and acts on resolutions that establish League policy.

Antioch City Council Report
August 11, 2026 Agenda Item 7 2

To vote at the Annual Business Meeting, the City Council must designate a Voting Member. The City may also appoint up to two alternate Voting Delegates, one of whom may vote if the designated voting delegate is unable to serve in that capacity.

The attached Voting Delegate form must be completed and returned to the League’s office no later than Tuesday September 1, 2026. This allows the League’s office time to reestablish voting delegate/alternate records prior to the conference.

ATTACHMENTS

A: League of California Cities Letter Dated May 13, 2026 Annual Conference General Assembly Guidelines
How it Works: Cal Cities Resolutions and the General Assembly 1400 K Street, Suite 400, Sacramento, CA 95814 • 916.658.8200 • calcities.org DATE: Wednesday, May 13, 2026
TO: M
ayors, Council Members, City Clerks, and City Managers
RE: D

ESIGNATION OF VOTING DELEGATES AND ALTERNATES
League of California Cities Annual Conference and Expo, Sept. 23-25, 2026 Anaheim Convention Center
Ev
ery year, the League of California Cities convenes a member-driven General Assembly at the Cal Cities Annual Conference and Expo. The General Assembly is an important opportunity where city officials can directly participate in the development of Cal Cities policy.

Tak
ing place on Friday, Sept. 25, 2026 the General Assembly is comprised of voting delegates appointed by each member city; every city has one voting delegate. Your appointed voting delegate plays an important role during the General Assembly by representing your city and voting on resolutions.

To ca
st a vote during the General Assembly, your city must designate a voting delegate and up to two alternate voting delegates, one of whom may vote if the designated voting delegate is unable to serve in that capacity. Voting delegates may either be an elected or appointed official.

Act
ion by Council Required. Consistent with Cal Cities bylaws, a city’s voting delegate and up to two alternates must be designated by the city council. Please note that designating the voting delegate and alternates must be done by city council action and cannot be accomplished by individual action of the mayor or city manager alone.

Fol
lowing council action, please submit your city’s delegates through the online submission portal by Tuesday, Sept. 1, 2026. When completing the Voting Delegate submission form, you will be asked to attest that council action was taken. You will need to be signed in to your My Cal Cities account when submitting the form.

Su
bmitting your voting delegate form by the deadline will allow us time to establish voting delegate/alternate records prior to the conference and provide pre-conference communications with voting delegates.

Con
ference Registration Required. The voting delegate and alternates must be registered to attend the conference. They need not register for the entire conference; they may register for Friday only. Conference registration opens June 2.

For
a city to cast a vote, one voter must be present at the General Assembly and in possession of the voting delegate card and voting tool. Voting delegates and Council Action Advised by September 1, 2026
Attachment A
alternates need to pick up their conference badges before signing in and picking up the voting delegate card at the voting delegate desk. This will enable them to receive the special sticker on their name badges that will admit the voting delegate into the voting area during the General Assembly.

Please view Cal Cities’ event and meeting policy in advance of the conference.

Transferring Voting Card to Non-Designated Individuals Not Allowed. The voting delegate card may be transferred freely between the voting delegate and alternates, but only between the voting delegate and alternates. If the voting delegate and alternates find themselves unable to attend the General Assembly, they may not transfer the voting card to another city official.

Seating Protocol during General Assembly. At the General Assembly, individuals with a voting card will sit in a designated area. Admission to the voting area will be limited to the individual in possession of the voting card and with a special sticker on their name badge identifying them as a voting delegate.

The voting delegate desk, located in the conference registration area of the Anaheim Convention Center, will be open at the following times: Wednesday, Sept. 23, 8:00 a.m.-6:00 p.m. and Thursday, Sept. 24, 7:30 a.m.-4:00 p.m. On Friday, Sept. 25, the voting delegate desk will be open at the General Assembly, starting at 7:30 a.m., but will be closed during roll calls and voting.

The voting procedures that will be used at the conference are attached to this memo.

Please share these procedures and this memo with your council and especially with the individuals that your council designates as your city’s voting delegate and alternates.

Once again, thank you for submitting your voting delegate and alternates by Tuesday, Sept. 1. If you have questions, please contact Zach Seals at [email protected].

Attachments:
• G
eneral Assembly Voting Guidelines
• Information Sheet: Cal Cities Resolutions and the General Assembly

1400 K Street, Suite 400, Sacramento, CA 95814 • 916.658.8200 • calcities.org

General Assembly Voting Guidelines

1. One City One Vote. Each member city has a right to cast one vote on matters pertaining to Cal Cities policy.

2. Designating a City Voting Representative. Prior to the Cal Cities Annual Conference and Expo, each city council may designate a voting delegate and up to two alternates; these individuals are identified on the voting delegate form provided to the Cal Cities Credentials Committee.

3. Registering with the Credentials Committee. The voting delegate, or alternates, may pick up the city's voting card at the voting delegate desk in the conference registration area. Voting delegates and alternates must sign in at the voting delegate desk. Here they will receive a special sticker on their name badge and thus be admitted to the voting area at the General Assembly.

4. Signing Initiated Resolution Petitions. Only those individuals who are voting delegates (or alternates), and who have picked up their city’s voting card by providing a signature to the credentials committee at the voting delegate desk, may sign petitions to initiate a resolution.

5. Voting. To cast the city's vote, a city official must have in their possession the city's voting card and voting tool; and be registered with the credentials committee. The voting card may be transferred freely between the voting delegate and alternates but may not be transferred to another city official who is neither a voting delegate nor alternate.

6. Voting Area at General Assembly. At the General Assembly, individuals with a voting card will sit in a designated area. Admission to the voting area will be limited to the individual in possession of the voting card and with a special sticker on their name badge identifying them as a voting delegate.

7. Resolving Disputes. In case of dispute, the credentials committee will determine the validity of signatures on petitioned resolutions and the right of a city official to vote at the General Assembly.

Sixty days before the
Annual Conference
and Expo, Cal Cities
members may submit
policy proposals on
issues of importance
to cities. The resolution must
have the concurrence of at least
five additional member cities or
individual members.

How it works: Cal Cities
Resolutions and the General Assembly
General Assembly
General Resolutions Policy Committees
Developing League of California Cities policy is a dynamic process that engages a wide range of members to ensure Cal Cities represents cities with one voice. These policies directly guide Cal Cities’ advocacy to promote local decision-making, and lobby against statewide policies that erode local control.

The resolutions process and General Assembly is one way that city officials can directly participate in the development of Cal Cities policy. If a resolution is approved at the General Assembly, it becomes official Cal Cities policy. Here’s how resolutions and the General Assembly work.

The petitioned
resolution is an
alternate method
to introduce policy
proposals during
the annual conference. The
petition must be signed by
voting delegates from 10% of
member cities, and submitted to
the Cal Cities President at least
24 hours before the beginning
of the General Assembly.

Petitioned Resolutions
The Cal Cities
President assigns
general resolutions
to policy committees
where members
review, debate, and recommend
positions for each policy proposal.

Recommendations are forwarded
to the Resolutions Committee.

Who’s who
The Resolutions Committee
includes representatives
from each Cal Cities
diversity caucus, regional
division, municipal
department, and policy
committee, as well as
individuals appointed by
the Cal Cities president.

Voting delegates
are appointed by each
member city; every city
has one voting delegate.

The General Assembly is a
meeting of the collective
body of all voting
delegates —one from
every member city.

Seven policy committees
meet throughout the year
to review and recommend
positions to take on bills
and regulatory proposals.

Policy committees include
members from each Cal
Cities diversity caucus,
regional division, and
municipal department,
as well as individuals
appointed by the Cal
Cities president.

During the General Assembly, voting delegates
debate and consider general and petitioned
resolutions forwarded by the Resolutions
Committee. Potential Cal Cities bylaws
amendments are also considered at this meeting.

Cal Cities policy
development is a member-
informed process,
grounded in the voices and
experiences of city officials
throughout the state.

For more information visit www.calcities.org/general-assembly Prior to the Annual Conference and Expo
Resolutions Committee
The Resolutions
Committee considers
all resolutions. General
Resolutions approved1 by
either a policy committee
or the Resolutions Committee are next
considered by the General Assembly.

General resolutions not approved, or
referred for further study by both a
policy committee and the Resolutions
Committee do not go to the General
Assembly. All Petitioned Resolutions
are considered by the General
Assembly, unless disqualified.2
During the Annual Conference and Expo
1 The Resolution Committee can amend a general resolution prior to sending it to the General Assembly. 2 Petitioned Resolutions may be disqualified by the Resolutions Committee according to Cal Cities Bylaws Article VI. Sec. 5(f). 8 Agenda #

STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: Regular Meeting of August 11, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
SUBMITTED BY: Shahad Wright, Parks and Recreation Director APPROVED BY: Ana Cortez, Acting City Manager AEC
SUBJECT: City Council D iscussion Item: Selection of Potential Park Location for Upcoming Available Grant Funding Through Proposition 4

RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council discuss the proposed park site options and provide direction to staff regarding the location that best aligns with the grant program requirements and project objectives.

FISCAL IMPACT
This recommended action has no direct fiscal impact at this time.

BACKGROUND
Proposition 4 is a California bond measure, approved by voters in November 2024, that provides $10 billion to address the impacts of climate change, including $700 million for parks and recreational projects. This park funding will be used for the expansi on of recreational activities, construction and renovation of local parks, repairing existing state parks, addressing deferred maintenance backlogs and enhancing public access to nature.

The California Department of State Parks, Office of Grants and Local Services (OGALS), will be administering a competitive grant funded by Proposition 4 in the next 12 -18 months. This is the same agency that administered Proposition 68 grant funds, of whic h Antioch received a $2.9M grant for the renovation of Contra Loma Estates Park.

It is anticipated that OGALS will use a similar application process as was used previously for Prop 68. An important component of the application is demonstrating community engagement in developing the application and proposal.

The grant will require that there be less than 3 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents and/or residents are below median income within a ½ mile radius of a selected point within SZW
Antioch City Council Report
August 11, 2026 Agenda Item # 2

the project site. It is also a requirement that public meetings on the potential project are held prior to the grant application being submitted.

DISCUSSION
At the Parks and Recreation Commission Regular Meeting of February 19, 2026, the Commission discussed an anticipated grant opportunity through Proposition 4 to develop or renovate a park within the City of Antioch. During that meeting, the Commission was provided with an overview of the grant program requirements, eligibility criteria, and the Community Fact Finder tool https://www.parksforcalifornia.org/communities/ which assists agencies in determining project eligibility and priority status for grant funding.

Since that meeting, staff conducted a preliminary evaluation of potential project sites and narrowed the focus of the Proposition 4 grant opportunity to two locations: City Park and the Beede Lumber Yard site.

City Park was last significantly renovated more than 20 years ago and continues to serve as one of Antioch’s most heavily utilized park facilities. According to Placer.ai visitation data, City Park ranks as the City’s most visited park. The site presents an opportunity for a transformational community investment that could include improvements such as a synthetic turf field, an all -inclusive playground, renovated and fully operational restroom facilities, pickleball courts, enhanced gathering spaces, and other recreational amenities.

Due to its central location, City Park also has the potential to generate income from user groups and continue to be a community hub.

The Beede Lumber Yard site is currently an undeveloped property located in Downtown Antioch. Preliminary community outreach and conceptual renderings for a future park at this location were completed in 2024. Development of the site would create a new public park and gathering space in the downtown area, further supporting community activation, recreation opportunities, and economic vitality.

While development of a new park at the Beede Lumber Yard site would result in additional annual maintenance and operational costs estimated between $200,000 and $250,000, public spaces in downtown areas can provide broader economic and community benefits by attracting visitors, supporting local businesses, and creating a “third place” for residents to gather outside of home and work.

Both locations appear to meet the preliminary eligibility requirements of the Proposition 4 grant program and present significant opportunities to expand recreational amenities and enhance quality of life for Antioch residents. Staff is seeking City Counci l direction regarding which project site should be advanced for further evaluation, community engagement, conceptual design, and grant application development.

ATTACHMENTS
Antioch City Council Report
August 11, 2026 Agenda Item # 3

A. Townsend Public Affairs, Inc. Presentation: Overview of Grant Guidelines B. List of Potential Project Sites
C. RHAA Concept Design Beede Lumber Yard
D. Memorandum on the selection of Antioch City Park

City of Antioch
Park Selection Criteria for Antioch’s Statewide Parks Program Application August 11, 2026
$77$&+0(176$
City of Antioch | Park Selection Criteria for Antioch’s Statewide Parks Program Application Slide 2

STATEWIDE PARK DEVELOPMENT AND COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION PROGRAM The largest park related grant program in California’s
history
Provides funding to create a new park, renovate an
existing park, or expand an existing park
Applications must focus on one park site
Park selection is an important consideration for a
competitive application
City of Antioch | Park Selection Criteria for Antioch’s Statewide Parks Program Application Slide 3

KEY COMPETITIVENESS FACTORS FOR PARK SITE SELECTION
Critical Lack of Park Space
Climate Vulnerability
Significant Poverty
Type of Project
Scored based on the ratio of park acres per 1,000 residents. Competitive project sites will have less than 3 park acres per 1,000 residents.

Scored based on median household income (MHI) and number of people living in poverty. Competitive project sites will have a MHI less than $79,000.

Scored based on the number of climate vulnerabilities in the project area.

Competitive project sites will have at least one climate vulnerability.

Creating a new park will receive the highest score (10 points), while renovating an existing park will receive the second highest score (9 points).

City of Antioch | Park Selection Criteria for Antioch’s Statewide Parks Program Application Slide 4
OPTION 1: CITY PARK

City of Antioch | Park Selection Criteria for Antioch’s Statewide Parks Program Application Slide 5
OPTION 2: BEEDE LUMBER YARD

City of Antioch | Park Selection Criteria for Antioch’s Statewide Parks Program Application Slide 6

COMPARISON
City Park Beede Lumber Yard
Critical Lack of Park
Space (15 points)
Median Household
Income (8 points)
Climate Vulnerability
(5 points)
Project Type (10
points)

0.86 Park Acres 1.82 Park Acres
Number of People in
Poverty (5 points)
$60,145 $61,166
968 647
Extreme Heat Extreme Heat and
Flooding
Renovate Existing
Park Create New Park
Draft
Guidelines
Public
Comment
Period Opens
May 26, 2026
Up to a 4-Year
Performance
Period
TBD
Anticipated
Award
Announcements
TBD
Final
Guidelines,
Grant
Solicitation
Opens
August 2026
City of Antioch | Park Selection Criteria for Antioch’s Statewide Parks Program Application STATEWIDE PARKS PROGRAM: TIMELINE
Slide 7
May 2026 June 2026 June 2026 August 2026 December 2026 TBD Public
Comment
Hearing #2
June 15, 2026
Grant Application
Due
December 2026
Public
Comment
Hearing #1
June 2, 2026
TBD
City of Antioch | Park Selection Criteria for Antioch’s Statewide Parks Program Application QUESTIONS?
Slide 8
Niccolo De Luca
Vice President & Chief Advocacy Officer
[email protected]
Zoe King
Associate
[email protected]
Alex Gibbs
Grants Director
[email protected]
California Advocacy | Federal Advocacy | Grant Writing
www.TownsendPA.com | (949) 399-9050
Possible Locations for Prop 4 Parks Grant Proposal
Park/ Property Name >3 Acres/ 1000? Low Income? Notes
City Park Yes Yes
Contra Loma Estates Park Yes Yes Rennovation Nearly Complete Utilizing Prop 68 Grant Eagles' Ridge Park Yes Yes 73.7% Per Capita Income. 124.1% Median Household Waldie Plaza Yes Yes
Beede Lumber Yard Yes Yes Potential Site of Rivertown Community Space Harbour Park Yes No
Memorial Field Yes No Property not owned by City
Canal Park No Yes
Fairview Park No Yes
Gentrytown Park No Yes
Jacobsen Park No Yes Rennovation Underway
Marchetti Park No Yes Renovation underway utilizing Prop 68 Per-Capita Funds Prosserville Park No Yes
Village East Park No Yes
Vacant Lots at 4th/5th/6th Street No Yes Potential Site of Veterans Park Almondridge Park No No
Antioch Community Park No No Property not owned by City Bay Miwok Meadows Park No No Park not in need of renovation Chaparral Park No No
Chichibu Park No No
Country Manor Park No No
Dallas Ranch Park No No
Deerfield Park No No
Diablo West Park No No
Hansen Park No No
Heidorn Park No No
Hillcrest Park No No
Julpun Park No No Park not in need of renovation
Knoll Park No No
Markley Creek Park No No
Meadowbrook Park No No
Meadow Creek Park No No
Mira Vista Park No No
Mira Vista Hills Park No No
Mountaire Park No No
Nelson Ranch Park No No
Prewett Community Park No No
Williamson Ranch Park No No

Fa(bώ
Landscape
Architectu re
& Planning
Antioch Rivertown
Concept Design Options
"55"$).&/54$
02 ANTIOCH’S RIVERTOWN COMMUNITY SPACE/
THEMES + INSPIRATION: OPTION 01
Heavily inspired by Antioch’s rich
industrial heritage, this concept design
blends elements of industrial materials
with representations of agriculture and
canneries. The layout of the space is
designed to echo the intricate, fractured
forms of the Sacramento-San Joaquin
Delta. This approach not only honors the
historical significance of the area but
also creates a dynamic and engaging
environment that reflects the natural and
industrial evolution of Antioch.

Women working in Antioch’s vegetable canneries A steam locomotive fueled by coal Railway tracksStacks of unfinished lumber
The Sacramento-San Joaquin delta
Agriculture & Fishing
Canneries
Coal Mining & Railroads
1 1
1 1
03 ANTIOCH’S RIVERTOWN COMMUNITY SPACE/
CONCEPT DESIGN 01
Lumber
3 3
3 2
2 Sacramento -
San Joaquin Delta
21 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 04
ANTIOCH’S RIVERTOWN COMMUNITY SPACE/
CONCEPT DESIGN 01
North entry plaza

Amphitheater

Stage
South gardens
Picnic area
Lawn
South entry plaza

Playground
Half basketball court/
Fitness area
Tree grove
Seating Area
Legend
8,084 SF
22,620 SF
Capacity: 2,500 people
2,266 SF
5,398 SF
1,661 SF
22,019 SF
3,200 SF
6,752 SF
2,183 SF
5,796 SF
2,992 SF
05 ANTIOCH’S RIVERTOWN COMMUNITY SPACE/
THEMES + INSPIRATION: OPTION 02
This concept design looks
into the natural landforms
surrounding the site, drawing
inspiration from the river and
dunes to shape its circulation
pathways. The design
incorporates site elements,
such as the shade structure and
playground, which are influenced
by the sailing ships and the
historical significance of the
former lumber yard. The use of
rustic timber materials further
enhances the connection to the
area’s past. Antioch Dunes planting
San Joaquin River streams and connectionsLarge stacks of timberWooden vessel on the water A sand dune with native planting
06 ANTIOCH’S RIVERTOWN COMMUNITY SPACE/
Rustic Lumber & Ships
San Joaquin River
1 1
1 CONCEPT DESIGN 02
Antioch Dunes
3 3
3 22
21 33
3 1
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
910
5 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 07
ANTIOCH’S RIVERTOWN COMMUNITY SPACE/
CONCEPT DESIGN 02
North entry plaza

Ampitheater

Stage
Lawn
Picnic areas
Dune planting
South entry way

Playground
Community
gathering area
Tree grove
Legend
6,631 SF
22,138 SF
Capacity: 2,460 people
1,733 SF
13,343 SF
1,951 SF
8,388 SF
2,122 SF
8,162 SF
2,320 SF
11,581 SF
08 ANTIOCH’S RIVERTOWN COMMUNITY SPACE/
Concept Design 02Concept Design 01
CALIFORNIA ADVOCACY • FEDERAL ADVOCACY • GRANT WRITING
Sacramento • Washington, D.C.

Northern California• Central California• Southern California

MEMORANDUM
T
o: City of Antioch
Fr
om Townsend Public Affairs
D
ate: April 21, 2026
S
ubject: State Parks Program: Competitive Park Selection Criteria for the City of Antioch
The
Statewide Park Development and Community Revitalization Program (SPP) is a grant program that creates new parks and recreation opportunities in underserved communities across California. Preparing a competitive application for this program requires careful project planning to meet the specific goals and priorities of SPP . Applicants can only include one park in their project, and selecting a project site that meets and exceeds the Project Selection Criteria is an important factor in developing a competitive application.

B
ased on previous rounds of SPP funding and ongoing conversations with the California Department of Parks and Recreation, TPA anticipates that the upcoming round of SPP will include the following Project Selection Criteria:
• Critical lack of park space. Priority is given to projects that have the lowest ratio of park space. Project sites must be located in an area with less than 3 park acres per 1,000
r
esidents to be eligible, with more points awarded to project sites that have the lowest park space compared to all applications.
• S
ignificant poverty. Priority is given to projects that are in areas with significant poverty.

P
roject sites must be located in an area with an average median household income less than $77,000 to be eligible, with more points awarded to project sites that have the lowest median household income compared to all applications.
1 In addition, more points ar e
aw
arded to project sites in close proximity to disadvantaged and severely disadvant aged c
ommunities.
1 The estimate that median household income at the project site will need to be $77,000 or less was provided verbally during a meeting with the California Department of Parks and Recreation. This estimate may change in the official grant program guidelines, once they are published. $77$&+0(176'

Page 2 ends

TPA met with the City of Antioch’s Public Works and Parks & Recreation departments to discuss potential project sites for SPP . Based on this criteria, we recommend selecting Antioch City Park for the City’s SPP application.

City Park is a very competitive selection due to the following:
• Critical lack of park space. City Park is in an area with 0.85 park acres per 1,000 residents. This meets the eligibility criteria and would likely receive additional points for being lower than other applications.
• Significant poverty. City Park is in an area with a medium income of $60,553. It is also located in a severely disadvantaged community and directly bordered by a disadvantaged community. This meets the eligibility criteria and would likely receive additional points for demonstrating higher levels of significant poverty than other applications.

City Park is definitively the most competitive project site across both selection criteria (lack of park space and significant poverty). While TPA and the City of Antioch considered multiple potential project sites, other options that were able to demonstrate significant poverty were less competitive in terms of park space, primarily due to their proximity to Corteva Wetlands Preserve and other large preservation areas.

9 Agenda Item

STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

DATE: Regular Meeting of August 11, 2026

TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council

SUBMITTED BY: Nicole Baptista, Senior Administrative Assistant

APPROVED BY: Ana Cortez, Acting City Manager AEC

SUBJECT: Discussion of Downtown Security Services

RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council discuss Downtown Security Services and provide direction to staff on how to proceed.

FISCAL IMPACT

There is no direct fiscal impact of the discussion surrounding downtown security services.

Should Council direct that the City resume security services and issue a request for proposal, the City Manager’s General Fund budget includes $102,500 for services, based on the pricing of the prior contract.

DISCUSSION
In December 2022, in response to increasing concerns from Rivertown/Downtown business owners and visitors regarding criminal activity and quality of life issues occurring in and around City-owned public parking lots, the City Council directed staff to evaluate options to improve public safety and security in the area. One key strategy identified was the deployment of private security services to act as a visible deterrent, identify safety issues, monitor City-owned properties and promptly report incidents and safety concerns to the Antioch Police Department.

Following a competitive Request for Qualifications (RFQ) process, the City selected Shield Protection & Public Safety, Inc., DBA Spearhead Protection, as the most qualified provider. The City entered into a professional services agreement with Spearhead Protection for services from January 9, 2024 through June 30, 2025 in the not-to-exceed amount of $100,068.

On April 23 , 202 5, t he City executed a first amend ed agreement, increasing the compensation by $ 49,932. On May 27, 2025, the City executed a second amended Antioch City Council Report
August 11, 2026, 2026 Agenda Item 9 2
agreement (mislabeled as a first amendment), extending services through June 30, 2026, and increasing compensation to the not-to-exceed amount of $100,000.

The previous contract provided security coverage seven days a week, including holidays, between the hours of 5:00 p.m. and midnight. Services include regular patrols of nine designated locations in the Rivertown/Downtown area by a uniformed guard in a marked security vehicle. A map of the nine locations is shown on page 18 of the prior RFQ in Attachment A and also enlarged in Attachment B.

On June 23, 2026, a third amendment to the original contract went before City Council.

City Council did not approve the third amendment and requested that a discussion take place to determine the need for security services. As of July 1, 2026 , the City of Antioch does not have additional downtown security services.

Staff asks that the City Council to discuss and determine next steps for downtown security services, including a potential RFQ issuance.

ATTACHMENTS

A. Previous RFQ for Private Security Services of City -Owned Assets and Parking Lots
B. Downtown Patrol Map
C. Calls for Service to Antioch Police Department from previous Security Company, Shield Protection & Public Safety
D. Service Logs from previous Security Company, Shield Protection & Public Safety E. Results from Downtown Business Survey
City of Antioch | City Manager’s Office
Request for Qualifications – Private Security Services

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ)
for Private Security Services
Downtown/Rivertown
City Owned Assets and Parking Lots
Submission Deadline:

Friday, September 22, 2023, at 3:00PM
CITY OF ANTIOCH | CITY MANAGER’S OFFICE
200 H Street, 3RD Floor, Antioch, CA 94509 | (925) 779-7011 Attention: Kwame P. Reed, Acting City Manager
$WWDFKPHQWA

City of Antioch | City Manager’s Office
Request for Qualifications – Private Security Services

Page 22 of 220 ends

INTRODUCTION

The City of Antioch (“City”) owns several developed and undeveloped properties and other real property assets in and around Downtown Antioch, also known as Rivertown. Over recent months, Downtown business owners have informed the City of increased criminal property damage caused, in part, by unsecured public parking lots. The City desires to engage a private security contractor to provide security patrol services for these public parking lots to discourage criminal activity.

This Request for Proposal may be obtained online at https://www.antiochca.gov/rfps/ . All interested firms shall submit five (5) copies of their Statement of Qualifications to the City Manager’s office no later than 3:00 p.m. on September 22, 2023. All responses must be addressed to the attention of the Acting City Manager and marked on the outside, " Response for Private Patrol Security Services." Submittals that are not received at the designated address on or before the specified deadline will not be accepted.

Any questions or requests regarding this RFQ may be submitted electronically to Kwame Reed, Acting City Manager at [email protected] .

Below is a proposed schedule for this RFQ for Private Security Services . The City of Antioch reserves the right to alter the following schedule as necessary.

Event Proposed Timeline
RFQ Issued September 1, 2023
Qualification Due September 22, 2023, at 3:00 pm
Initial Review September 25 -29, 2023 /subject to change Interviews (tentative, if necessary) Week of September 25-29, 2023 Announcement of Selected Provider
(Post City Council Approval)

Week of October 9-13, 2023

BACKGROUND

Antioch has a history that starts before California became a state. The area was originally settled in the late summer of 1850 and incorporated as a City in 1872. Located on the banks of the San Joaquin

City of Antioch | City Manager’s Office
Request for Qualifications – Private Security Services

Page 33 of 220 ends

River and being the second largest City in Contra Costa County with a population of over 115,000; the City offers endless outdoor activities and is a thriving business hub.

Families with dreams of homeownership come to Antioch for its beautiful neighborhoods, parks, and natural beauty. Land remains plentiful and affordable, compared with other parts of the Bay Area. Antioch is one of the few Bay Area communities that offers naturally affordable housing. The pace of development in Antioch has spurred activity for the healthcare industry, financial and insurance institutions, contractors, and other types of businesses. Increased development has created increased employment in schools, hospitals, and other local service sectors. Bringing quality jobs to Antioch is one of the City Council and Communities priorities.

The City of Antioch was incorporated in February 1872 as a General Law City and operates under a Council-Manager form of government. Policymaking and legislative authority is vested in a five- member City Council consisting of a Mayor and four Council Members. The four Council Members are elected to four-year overlapping terms. The Mayor is directly elected to a four-year term. The Council appoints the City Manager, City Attorney, and members of advisory committees.

Antioch is a community that is proud of its heritage; a community that provides an opportunity to live, learn, work, worship and play in a safe, stimulating, and diverse community; a community that is a responsible steward of its economic and natural resources; a community that recognizes its responsibility to the vast Delta Region, and will be a pro-active advocate and a leader in promoting regional cooperation.

SCOPE OF SERVICES

The objective of this Request for Qualification (RFQ) process is to establish a list of qualified private patrol security service providers to provide private patrol security services for City-owned public parking lots located in Downtown Antioch. A map of these facilities is attached. The patrol is expected to be actively engaged in patrol from 10:00 pm to 6:00 am daily.

The consultant or the City may propose additional tasks as deemed necessary to complete the assignments. Any additional work shall be compensated as agreed upon in the consultant’s contract with the City.

City of Antioch | City Manager’s Office
Request for Qualifications – Private Security Services

Page 44 of 220 ends

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

All proposals should be concise, to the point, and should include the following information organized as separate sections of the proposal.

I. Letter of Interest.

All proposals shall be accompanied by a letter addressed to Kwame Reed, Acting City Manager, signed by an officer authorized to commit firm resources. The letter shall include the following:

a. The name of the proposing firm, the primary contact, mailing and physical address, telephone number and email address.
b. Cover letter stating interest in the work and whether the consultant provides services related to state government, federal government, or both. c. Certification that (1) all information submitted in the proposal is true and correct, (2) the person signing the proposal has the full authority to do so on behalf of the firm, (3) the fees proposed have not been knowingly disclosed, directly or indirectly, to any other firm responding to this RFQ, and (4) no attempt has been made by the proposing firm to induce any other company to submit or not submit a response to this RFQ for the purpose of restricting competition.

II. Previous Experience.

Statement of previous experience and expertise, including a minimum of three other local governments for which Proposer has provided similar services. Provide clear and concise description of relevant experience and expertise of the firm and the qualifications of the individuals that would perform both the requested and required work, including all applicable education, experience, licenses, and professional designations.

III. Staffing and Qualifications
Names and qualifications of key personnel assigned to this project, including resumes.

Names of qualified subcontractors, if any, including resumes of key subcontractor personnel.

IV. References
All proposals shall include a minimum of three client references, with at least one reference being a recent municipal client. References should include the client’s name, contact person, mailing address, telephone number and email address.

City of Antioch | City Manager’s Office
Request for Qualifications – Private Security Services

Page 55 of 220 ends

V. Professional Services Agreement; Exceptions to the Specifications Provide a statement that Proposer has reviewed the City’s standard Professional Services Agreement (Attachment 1) and is able to meet the requirements in the Agreement with specific attention to the insurance requirements. Untimely exceptions to the proposal specifications or the Professional Services Agreement are waived.

VI. Fee Proposal
All proposals shall include a detailed explanation of the fees and costs to be charged to the City for the services described in this RFQ. Please note that travel time to Downtown Antioch or other deployment must be called out specifically if anticipated.

EVALUATION PROCESS

Proposals will be evaluated in accordance with the criteria outlined in the section entitled Submission Requirements. Proposals will be evaluated for specificity, completeness, personnel qualifications, and demonstrated knowledge and experience as described in the section entitled Scope of Services.

Phases of Evaluation. Proposals will be reviewed by committee in four general phases:

a. All proposals will be evaluated based on the submission requirements and criteria. b. The Committee shall rate and compose a short list of Providers based on the submission requirements and criteria.
c. Fee proposals will be reviewed and evaluated.
d. The Committee may require an interview of Respondents (and key personnel).

The City will select the consultant based on demonstrated competence and on the possession of the professional qualifications necessary for the satisfactory performance of the services required.

The agreement may not necessarily be awarded to the lowest responsible proposer.

When selecting the consultant, the skill and ability of the entity or personnel performing the services is a key component of the selection criteria.

City of Antioch | City Manager’s Office
Request for Qualifications – Private Security Services

Page 66 of 220 ends

OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS

I. Reservation of Rights.

The Antioch City Manager’s Office reserves the right to cancel this RFQ, or to reject, in whole or in part, any and all proposals received in response to this RFQ. The Antioch City Manager’s Office, upon its determination, further reserves the right to waive any minor informality in any proposals received, if it is in the public interest to do so. The determination of the criteria and process whereby proposals are evaluated, the decision as to who shall receive a contract award, or whether or not to award, shall be made as a result of the RFQ and at the sole and absolute discretion of the Antioch City Manager’s Office.

II. Payment Terms.

Providers will be required to submit invoices on a monthly basis. The invoice will include a breakdown of all services provided and the hourly rate for such services.

City of Antioch | City Manager’s Office
Request for Qualifications – Private Security Services

Page 77 of 220 ends

ATTACHMENTS

Attachment 1 – Standard Professional Services Agreement Attachment 2 – Facilities Map

Remainder of this page intentionally left blank

City of Antioch | City Manager’s Office
Request for Qualifications – Private Security Services

Page 88 of 220 ends

ATTACHMENT 1

CONSULTING SERVICES/PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN

THE CITY OF ANTIOCH AND
___________________________________[NAME OF CONSULTANT] THIS AGREEMENT ( “Agreement”) is made and entered into this _____ day of _________________, 202___ ( “Effective Date”) by and between the City of Antioch, a municipal Corporation with its principle place of business at 200 H Street, Antioch, CA 94509 (“City”) and _____________________________ with its principle place of business at _____________________________ (“Consultant”). City and Consultant individually are sometimes referred to herein as “Party” and collectively as “Parties.” SECTION 1. SERVICES. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, Consultant shall furnish all technical and professional services including labor, material, equipment, transportation, supervision and expertise to provide to City the services described in the Scope of Work attached as Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein at the time and place and in the manner specified therein ( “Services”). In the event of a conflict in or inconsistency between the terms of this Agreement and Exhibit A, the Agreement shall prevail.

1.1 Term of Services. The term of this Agreement shall begin on the Effective Date and shall end on _______________, the date of completion specified in Exhibit A, and Consultant shall complete the Services described in Exhibit A prior to that date, unless the term of the Agreement is otherwise terminated or extended, as provided for in Section

8. The time provided to Consultant to complete the Services required by this Agreement shall not affect the City’s right to terminate the Agreement, under Section 8.

1.2 Standard of Performance. Consultant represents that it is experienced in providing these services to public clients and is familiar with the plans and needs of City. Consultant shall perform all Services required pursuant to this Agreement in the manner and according to the standards observed by a competent practitioner of the profession in which Consultant is engaged in the geographical area in which Consultant practices its profession.

1.3 Assignment of Personnel. Consultant shall assign only competent personnel to perform Services pursuant to this Agreement. In the event that City, in its sole discretion, at any time during the term of this Agreement, desires the reassignment of any such persons, Consultant shall, immediately upon receiving notice from City of such desire of City, reassign such person or persons.

1.4 Time. Consultant shall devote such time to the performance of Services pursuant to this Agreement as may be reasonably necessary to meet the standard of performance provided in Section 1.1 above and to satisfy Consultant’s obligations hereunder.

SECTION 2. COMPENSATION. City hereby agrees to pay Consultant a sum not to exceed ______________________, notwithstanding any contrary indications that may be contained in Consultant’s proposal, for Services to be performed and reimbursable costs incurred under this Agreement. In the event of a conflict between this Agreement and Consultant’s proposal, attached as Exhibit A, regarding the amount of compensation, the Agreement shall prevail. City shall pay Consultant for Services rendered pursuant to this Agreement at the time and in the manner set forth below. The payments specified below shall be the only payments from City to Consultant for Services rendered pursuant to this Agreement. Except as specifically authorized by City, Consultant shall not bill City for duplicate services performed by more than one person.

Consultant and City acknowledge and agree that compensation paid by City to Consultant under this Agreement is based upon Consultant’s estimated costs of providing the Services required hereunder, including salaries and benefits of employees and subcontractors of Consultant. Consequently, the Parties further agree that compensation hereunder is intended to include the c osts of

City of Antioch | City Manager’s Office
Request for Qualifications – Private Security Services

Page 99 of 220 ends

contributions to any pensions and/or annuities to which Consultant and its employees, agents, and subcontractors may be eligibl e. City therefore has no responsibility for such contributions beyond compensation required under this Agreement.

2.1 Invoices. Consultant shall submit invoices, not more often than once a month during the term of this Agreement, based on the cost for Services performed and reimbursable costs incurred prior to the invoice date. Invoices shall contain the following information:
Serial identifications of progress bills; i.e., Progress Bill No. 1 for the first invoice, etc.;

The beginning and ending dates of the billing period;

A Task Summary containing the original contract amount, the amount of prior billings, the total due this period, the balance available under the Agreement, and the percentage of completion;

At City’s option, for each work item in each task, a copy of the applicable time entries or time sheets shall be submitted showing the name of the person doing the work, the hours spent by each person, a brief description of the work, and each reimbursable expense;

The total number of hours of work performed under the Agreement by Consultant and each employee, agent, and subcontractor of Consultant performing services; and,

The Consultant’s signature.

2.2 Payment Schedule.

2.2.1 City shall make incremental payments, based on invoices received, [according to the payment schedule attached as Exhibit B and incorporated herein], for Services satisfactorily performed, in accordance with the requirements of this Agreement, and for authorized reimbursable costs incurred. City shall have thirty (30) days from the receipt of an invoice that complies with all of the requirements of Section 2.1 to pay Consultant.

2.2.2 City shall pay the last 10% of the total sum due pursuant to this Agreement within sixty (60) days after completion of the services and submittal to City a final invoice, if all services required have been satisfactorily performed.]

2.3 Total Payment. City shall pay for the Services to be rendered by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement.

City shall not pay any additional sum for any expense or cost whatsoever incurred by Consultant in rendering Services pursuant to this Agreement, unless expressly provided for in Section 2.5.

In no event shall Consultant submit any invoice for an amount in excess of the maximum amount of compensation provided above either for a task or for the entire Agreement, unless the Agreement is modified prior to the submission of such an invoice by a properly executed change order or amendment.

2.4 Hourly Fees. Fees for work performed by Consultant on an hourly basis shall not exceed the amounts shown on the fee schedule in Exhibit B.

2.5 Reimbursable Expenses. Reimbursable expenses are specified below, and shall not exceed ______________________________________________ ($ ). Expenses not listed below are not chargeable to City.

Reimbursable expenses are included in the total amount of compensation provided under this Agreement that shall not be exceeded.

Reimbursable Expenses are:
___________________________

City of Antioch | City Manager’s Office
Request for Qualifications – Private Security Services

Page 110 of 220 ends

2.6 Payment of Taxes. Consultant is solely responsible for the payment of employment taxes incurred under this Agreement and any similar federal or state taxes.

2.7 Authorization to Perform Services. The Consultant is not authorized to perform any Services or incur any costs whatsoever under the terms of this Agreement until Consultant receives authorization to proceed from the Contract Administrator.

SECTION 3. FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT. Except as set forth herein, Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, provide all facilities and equipment that may be necessary to perform the Services required by this Agreement. City shall make available to Consultant only the facilities and equipment listed in this section, and only under the terms and conditions set forth herein.

City shall furnish physical facilities such as desks, filing cabinets, and conference space, as may be reasonably necessary for Consultant’s use while consulting with City employees and reviewing records and the information in possession of the City. The location, quantity, and time of furnishing those facilities shall be in the sole discretion of City. In no event shall City be obligated to furnish an y facility that may involve incurring any direct expense, including but not limited to computer, long-distance telephone or other communication cha rges, vehicles, and reproduction facilities.

SECTION 4. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Before beginning any work under this Agreement, Consultant, at its own cost and expense, shall procure insurance against claims for inju ries to persons or damages to property that may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work by the Consultant and its agents, representatives, employees, and subcontractors. Consultant shall provide proof satisfactory to City of such insurance that meets the requirements of this section and under forms of insurance satisfactory in all respects to the City. Consultant shall maintain the insurance policies required by this section throughout the term of this Agreement. The cost of such insurance shall be included in the Consultant's proposal. Consultant shall not allow any subcontractor to co mmence work on any subcontract until Consultant has obtained all insurance required herein for the subcontractor(s) and provided evidence thereof to City. Verification of the required insurance shall be submitted and made part of this Agreement prior to execution. Insurers shall have an AM Best rating of no less than A:VII unless otherwise accepted by the City in writing:

4.1 Commercial General Liability (CGL ). Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an “occurrence” basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal & advertising injury with limits no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. I f Consultant’s services include work within 50 feet of a railroad right of way, the Consultant shall have removed any exclusion on their liability policy limiting coverage for work near a ra ilroad, or shall provide a Railroad Protective Liability policy in favor of the City. Limits for such coverage shall be no less than $5,000,000.

4.2 Automobile Liability Insurance. ISO Form Number CA 00 01 covering any auto (Code 1), or if Consultant has no owned autos, hired, (Code 8) and non-owned autos (Code 9), with limit no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.

4.3 Workers' Compensation Insurance. Workers’ Compensation Insurance as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer’s Liability Insurance with limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.

4.4 Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions). Insurance appropriate to the Consultant’s profession, with limit no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence or claim, $2,000,000 aggregate.

4.5 Other Insurance Provisions. Unless otherwise specified below, all insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:

City of Antioch | City Manager’s Office
Request for Qualifications – Private Security Services

Page 111 of 220 ends

4.5.1 Additional Insured Status. The City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. CGL coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Consultant’s insurance (at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 11 85 or if not available, through the addition of both CG 20 10 and CG 20 37 if a later edition is used). This requirement shall on ly apply to the CGL and Automobile Liability Insurance policies specified above.

4.5.2 Primary Coverage. For any claims related to this contract, the Consultant’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, official s, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it. This requirement shall only apply to the CGL and Automobile Liability Insurance policies specified above.

4.5.3 Notice of Cancellation. Each insurance policy required above shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled, except with notice to the City.

4.5.4 Waiver of Subrogation. Consultant hereby grants to City a waiver of any right to subrogation which any insurer of said Consultant may acquire against the City by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance.

Consultant agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the City has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer. This requirement shall only apply to the CGL, Automobile Liabilit y and Workers’ Compensation/Em ployer’s Liability Insurance policies specified above.

4.5.5 Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. The City may require the Consul tant to purchase coverage with a lower deductible or retention or provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention.

4.5.6 Claims made policies. If any of the required policies provide claims-made coverage:

4.5.6.1 The Retroactive Date must be shown, and must be before the date of the contract or the beginning of contract work.

4.5.6.2 Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the contract of work.

4.5.6.3 If coverage is canceled or non-renewed, and not replaced with another claims-made policy form with a Retroactive Date prior to the contract effective date, the Consultant must purchase “extended reporting” coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of contract work.

4.6 Certificate of Insurance and Endorsements. Consultant shall furnish the City with original certificates and amendatory endorsements or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage required by this clause. All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Consultant’s obligation to provide them. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time.

4.7 Subcontractors. Consultant shall include all subcontractors as insured under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and endorsements for each subcontractor. A ll coverages for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the requirements stated in this Agreement, including but not limited to naming additional insureds.

City of Antioch | City Manager’s Office
Request for Qualifications – Private Security Services

Page 112 of 220 ends

4.8 Higher Limits. If the Consultant maintains higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to coverage for the higher limits maintained by the Consultant. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City.

4.9 Special Risks or Circumstances. City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage or other special circumstances.

4.10 Remedies. In addition to any other remedies City may have if Consultant fails to provide or maintain any insurance policies or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, City may, at its sole option exercise, any of the following remedies, which are alternatives to other remedies City may have and are not the exclusive remedy for Consultant’s breach:
Obtain such insurance and deduct and retain the amount of the premiums for such insurance from any sums due to Consultant under the Agreement;
Order Consultant to stop work under this Agreement or withhold any payment that becomes due to Consultant hereunder, or both stop work and withhold any payment, until Consultant demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof; and/or,
Terminate this Agreement.

SECTION 5. INDEMNIFICATION AND CONSULTANT’S RESPONSIBILITIES.

5.1 To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall defend (with counsel reasonably acceptable to City), indemnify and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees, volunteers, and agents free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liability, loss, damage or injury of any kind, in law or equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of, pertaining to, or incident to any acts, errors or omissions, or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officials, officers, employees, s ubcontractors, consultants or agents in connection with the performance of the Consultant’s services or this Agreement, including without limitation the payment of all damages, expert witness fees and attorney’s fees and other related costs and expenses. Consultant's obligation to indemnify shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by Consultant, the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, or volunteers.

5.1.1 Acceptance by City of insurance certificates and endorsements required under this Agreement does not relieve Consultant from liability under this indemnification and hold harmless clause. This indemnification and hold harmless clause shall apply to any damages or claims for damages whether or not such insurance policies shall have been determined to apply.

5.2 By execution of this Agreement, Consultant acknowledges and agrees to the provisions of this Section and that it is a material element of consideration, and that these provisions survive the termination of this Agreement.

SECTION 6. STATUS OF CONSULTANT.

6.1 Independent Contractor. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall be an independent contractor and shall not be an employee of City. City shall have the right to control Consultant only insofar as the results o f Consultant's services rendered pursuant to this Agreement and assignment of personnel pursuant to Section 1.3; however, otherwise City shall not have the right to control the manner or means by which Consultant accomplishes services rendered pursuant to this Agreement. Notwithstanding any other City, state, or federal policy, rule, regulation, law, or ordinance to t he contrary, Consultant and any of its employees, agents, and subc ontractors providing services under this Agreement shall not qualify for or become entitled to, and hereby agree to waive any and all claims to, any compensation, benefit, or any incident of employment by City, including, but not limited to, eligibility to enroll in the California Public Employees Retirement Syste m

City of Antioch | City Manager’s Office
Request for Qualifications – Private Security Services

Page 113 of 220 ends

(PERS) as an employee of City and entitlement to any contribu tion to be paid by City for employer contributions and/or employee contributions for PERS benefits.

6.2 Consultant Not Agent. Except as City may specify in writing, Consultant shall have no authority, express or implied, to act on behalf of City in any capacity whatsoever as an agent. Consultant shall have no authority, express or implied, pursuant to this Agreement to bind City to any obligation whatsoever.

SECTION 7. LEGAL REQUIREMENTS.

7.1 Governing Law. The laws of the State of California shall govern this Agreement.

7.2 Compliance with Applicable Laws. Consultant and any subcontractors shall comply with all laws applicable to the performance of the Services.

7.3 Other Governmental Regulations. To the extent that this Agreement may be funded by fiscal assistance from another governmental entity, Consultant and any subcontractors shall comply with all applicable rules and regulations to which City is bound by the terms of such fiscal assistance program.

7.4 Licenses and Permits. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant and its employees, agents, and any subcontractors have all licenses, permits, qualifications, and approvals of whatsoever nature that are legally required to practice their respective professions. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant and its employees, agents, any subcontractors shall, at their sole cost and expense, keep in effect at all times during the term of this Agreement any licenses, permits, and approvals that are legally required to practice their respective professions. In addition to the foregoing, Consultant and any subcontractors shall obtain and maintain during the term of this Agreement valid business licenses from City.

7.5 Nondiscrimination and Equal Opportunity. Consultant shall not discriminate, on the basis of a person’s race, religion, color, national origin, age, physical or mental handicap or disability, medical condition, marital status, sex, sexual orientation or any other legally protected status, against any em ployee, applicant for employment, subcontractor, bidder for a subcontract, or participant in, recipient of, or applicant for any services or programs provided by Consultant under this Agreement. Consultant shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, policies, rules, and requirements related to equal opportunity and nondiscrimination in employment, contracting, and the provision of any Services that are the subject of this Agreement, including but not limited to the satisfaction of any positive obligations required of Consultant thereby.

Consultant shall include the provisions of this Section in any subcontract approved by the Contract Administrator or this Agreement.

7.6 California Labor Code Requirements. Consultant is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Sections 1720 et seq. and 1770 et seq., which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on certain “public works” and “maintenance” projects (“Prevailing Wage Laws”). If the services are being performed as part of an applicable “public works” or “maintenance” project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claims, liabilities, costs, penalties or interest arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. It shall b e mandatory upon the Consultant and all subconsultants to comply with all California Labor Code provisions, which include but are not limited to prevailing wages (Labor Code Sections 177 1, 1774 and 1775), employment of apprentices (Labor Code Section 1777.5), certified payroll records (Labor Code Sections 1771.4 and 1776), hours of labor (Labor Code Sections 1813 and 1815) and debarment of contractors and subcontractors (Labor Code Section 1777.1). The requirement to submit certified payroll records directly to the Labor Commissioner under Labor Code section 1771.4 shall not apply to work performed on a public works project that is exempt pursuant to the small project exemption specified in Labor Code Section 1771.4.

City of Antioch | City Manager’s Office
Request for Qualifications – Private Security Services

Page 114 of 220 ends

If the services are being performed as part of an applicable “public works” or “maintenance” project, then pursuant to Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1, the Consultant and all subconsultants performing such services must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations. Consultant shall maintain registration for the full term of this Agreement and require the same of any subconsultan ts, as applicable. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the contractor registration requirements mandated by Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1 shall not apply to work performed on a public works project that is exempt pursuant to the small project exemption specified in Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1.

This Agreement may also be subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations. It shal l be Consultant’s sole responsibility to comply with all applicable registration and labor compliance requirements. Any stop orders issued by the Department of Industrial Relations against Consultant or any subcontractor that affect Consultant’s performance of services, including any delay, shall be Consultant’s sole responsibility. Any delay arising out of or resulting from such stop orders shall be con sidered Consultant caused delay and shall not be compensable by the City. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its of ficials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of stop orders issued by the Department of Industrial Relations against Consultant or any subcontractor.

SECTION 8. TERMINATION AND MODIFICATION.

8.1 Termination. City may cancel this Agreement at any time and without cause upon written notification to Consultant.

Consultant may cancel this Agreement only for cause upon thirty (30) days’ written notice to City and shall include in such not ice the reasons for cancellation.

In the event of termination, Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for Services performed satisfactorily to the effectiv e date of termination; City, however, may condition payment of such compensation upon Consultant delivering to City any or all documents, photographs, computer software, video and audio tapes, and other mate rials provided to Consultant or prepared by or for Consult ant or the City in connection with this Agreement.

8.2 Extension. City may, in their sole and exclusive discretion, extend the end date of the term of this Agreement beyond that provided for in Section 1.1. Any such extension shall require a written amendment to this Agreement, as provided for herein. Consultant understands and agrees that, if City gr ants such an extension, City shall have no obligation to provide Consultant with compensation beyond the maximum amount provided for in this Agreement. Similarly, unless authorized by the Contract Administrator, City shall have no obligation to reimburse Consultant for any otherwise reimbursable expenses incurred during the extension period.

8.3 Amendments. The parties may amend this Agreement only by a writing signed by all the Parties.

8.4 Assignment and Subcontracting. City and Consultant recognize and agree that this Agreement contemplates personal performance by Consultant and is based upon a determination of Consultant’s unique personal competence, experience, and specialized personal knowledge. Moreover, a substantial inducement to City for entering into this Agreement was and is the professional reputation and competence of Consultant. Consultant may not assign this Agreement or any interest therein without the prior written approval of the Contract Administrator. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the performance contemplated and provided for herein, other than to the subcontractors noted in the proposal, without prior written approval of the Contract Administrator.

8.5 Survival. All obligations arising prior to the termination of this Agreement and all provisions of this Agreement allocating liability between City and Consultant shall survive the termination of this Agreement.

8.6 Options upon Breach by Consultant. If Consultant materially breaches any of the terms of this Agreement, City’s remedies shall include, but not be limited to, the following:

City of Antioch | City Manager’s Office
Request for Qualifications – Private Security Services

Page 115 of 220 ends

8.6.1 Immediately terminate the Agreement;

8.6.2 Retain the plans, specifications, drawings, r eports, design documents, and any other work product prepared by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement; and/or

8.6.3 Retain a different consultant to complete the work described in Exhibit A not finished by Consultant in which case the City may charge Consultant the difference between the cost to have a different consultant complete the work described in Exhibit A that is unfinished at the time of breach and the amount that City would have paid Consultant pursuant to Section 2 if Consultant had completed the work.

SECTION 9. KEEPING AND STATUS OF RECORDS.

9.1 Records Created as Part of Consultant’s Performance. All reports, data, maps, models, charts, studies, surveys, photographs, memoranda, plans, studies, specificatio ns, drawings, records, files, or any other documents or materials, in electronic or any other form, that Consultant prepares or obtains pursuant to this Agreement and that relate to the matters covered hereunder shall be the property of the City. Consultant hereby agrees to deliver those documents to the City upon termination of the Agreement. It is understood and agreed that the documents and other materials, including but not limited to those described above, prepared pursuant to this Agreement are prepared specifically for the City and are not necessarily suitable for any future or other use.

9.2 Confidentiality. All reports, data, maps, models, charts, studies, surveys, photographs, memoranda, plans, studies, specifications, records, files, or any other documents or materials, in electronic or any other form, that Consultant prepares or obtains pursuant to this Agreement and that relate to the matters covered hereunder shall be kept confidential by Consultant. Such materials shall not, without the prior written permission of City, be used by Consultant for any purpose other than the performance of this Agreement nor shall such materials be disclosed publicly. Nothing furnished to Consultant which is generally known, shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use the City’s name or logo or photographs pertaining to the Services under this Agreement in any publication without the prior written consent of the City.

9.3 Consultant’s Books and Records. Consultant shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, and other records or documents eviden cing or relating to charges for Services or expenditures and disbursements charged to the City under this Agreement for a minimum of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to the Consultant.

9.4 Inspection and Audit of Records. Any records or documents that Section 9.2 of this Agreement requires Consultant to maintain shall be made available for inspection, audit, and/or copying at any time during regular business hours, upon oral or written request of the City. Under California Government Code Section 8546.7, if the amount of public funds expended under this Agreement exceeds Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00), the Agreement shall be subject to the examination and audit of the State Auditor, at the request of City or as part of any audit of City, for a period of three (3) y ears after final payment under the Agreement.

9.5 Intellectual Property. The City shall have and retain all right, title and interest, including copyright, patent, trade secret or other proprietary rights in all plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, materials, data, computer programs or software and source code, enhancements, documents and any other works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium or expression, including but not limited to physical drawings or other data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer media (“Intellectual Property”) prepared or developed by or on behalf of Consultant under this Agreement.

Consultant further grants to City a non-exclusive and perpet ual license to copy, use, modify or sub-license any and all Intellectual Property otherwise owned by Consultant which is the basis or foundation for any derivative, collective, insurrectional or supplemental work created under this Agreement.

City of Antioch | City Manager’s Office
Request for Qualifications – Private Security Services

Page 116 of 220 ends

SECTION 10. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS.

10.1 Venue. In the event either party brings any action against the other under this Agreement, the Parties agree that trial of such action shall be vested exclusively in the state courts of California in the County of Contra Costa or in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

10.2 Severability. If a court of competent jurisdiction finds or rules that any provision of this Agreement is invalid, void, or unenforceable, the provisions of this Agreement not so adjudged shall remain in full force and effect. The invalidity in whole or in part of any provision of this Agreement shall not void or affect the validity of any other provision of this Agreement.

10.3 No Implied Waiver of Breach. The waiver of any breach of a specific provision of this Agreement does not constitute a waiver of any other breach of that term or any other term of this Agreement.

10.4 Successors and Assigns. The provisions of this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and shall apply to and bind the successors and assigns of the Parties.

10.5 Use of Recycled Products. Consultant shall prepare and submit all reports, written studies and other printed material on recycled paper to the extent it is available at equal or less cost than virgin paper.

10.6 Conflict of Interest. Consultant may serve other clients, but none whose activities within the corporate limits of City or whose business, regardless of location, would place Consultant in a “conflict of interest,” as that term is defined in the Political Reform Act, codified at California Government Code Section 81000 et seq.

Consultant shall not employ any official of City in the work per formed pursuant to this Agreement. No officer or employee of C ity shall have any financial interest in this Agreement that would violate California Government Code Section 1090 et seq.

Consultant hereby warrants that it is not now, nor has it been in the previous twelve (12) months, an employee, agent, appointee, or official of the City. If Consultant was an employee, agent, appointee, or official of City in the previous twelve months, Consultant warrants that it did not participate in any manner in the forming of this Agreement. Consultant understands that, if this Agreement is made in violation of Government Code § 1090 et. seq., the entire Agreement is void and Consultant will not be entitled to any compensation for Services performed pursuant to this Agreement, including reimbursement of expenses, and Consultant will be required to reimburse the Cit y for any sums paid to the Consultant. Consultant understands that, in addition to the foregoing, it may be subject to criminal pros ecution for a violation of Government Code Section 1090 and, if applicable, will be disqualified from holding public office in the State of California.

10.7 Inconsistent Terms. If the terms or provisions of this Agreement conflict with or are inconsistent with any term or provision of any Exhibit attached hereto, then the terms and provisions of this Agreement shall prevail.

10.8 Solicitation. Consultant agrees not to solicit business at any meeting, focus group, or interview related to this Agreement, either orally or through any written materials.

10.9 Contract Administration. This Agreement shall be administered by _______________________________ ("Contract Administrator"). All correspondence shall be directed to or through the Contract Administrator or his or her designee.

10.10 Notices. Any written notice to Consultant shall be sent to:
____________________________________________
____________________________________________
____________________________________________
____________________________________________
Any written notice to City shall be sent to:

City of Antioch | City Manager’s Office
Request for Qualifications – Private Security Services

Page 117 of 220 ends

[INSERT DEPARTMENT/NAME]
City of Antioch
P. O. Box 5007
Antioch, CA 94531-5007
City of Antioch
P. O. Box 5007
Antioch, CA 94531-5007
Attn: City Attorney

10.11 Integration. This Agreement, including al l exhibits and other attachments, repres ents the entire and integrated agreement between City and Consultant and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements, either written or oral.

CITY: CONSULTANT:

CITY OF ANTIOCH [NAME OF CONSULTANT]
____________________________________ By:______________________________ Kwame P. Reed, Acting City Manager
Name:___________________________
Title:____________________________
Attest:

____________________________________ By:_____________________________ Elizabeth Householder
City Clerk
Name:___________________________
Title:____________________________
Approved as to Form:
____________________________
Thomas Lloyd Smith, City Attorney

[Two signatures are required for a corporation or one signature with the corporate bylaws indicating that one person can sign on behalf of the corporation]

City of Antioch | City Manager’s Office
Request for Qualifications – Private Security Services

Page 118 of 220 ends

ATTACHMENT 2

Downtown Public Parking Lots

Downtown Patrol Map
Attachment B

Attachment C
Shield Protection & Public Safety (Spearhead) calls for service to the Antioch Police Department There were 83 calls for service where Spearhead Security was the Reporting Party between 01/01/2024 – 06/30/2026
Please see below for breakdown of calls for service and location

CALL/COMPLAINT TYPE TOTAL
RECKLESS DRIVING 15
SUSPICIOUS CIRCUMSTANCE 7
SUSPICIOUS VEHICLE 6
LOITERING COMPLAINT 5
MOTORCYLE COMPLAINT 5
TRESPASSING 4
FIRE 4
FIREWORKS COMPLAINT 3
FIRE/AMBULANCE INFORMATION 3
WELFARE CHECK 3
BE ON THE LOOKOUT 2
SUSPICIOUS PERSON 2
SECURITY CHECK 2
AUDIBLE ALARM 2
UNWANTED GUEST 2
FIRE/ AMBULANCE INFORMATION 2

STREET NAME TOTAL
W 2ND ST 19
MARINA PLZ 15
W 1ST ST 7
H ST 7
G ST 6
SAN JOSE DR 6
I ST 5
MARINA PL 2
E ST 2
DEER VALLEY RD 2

ADDRESS TOTAL
1 MARINA PLZ ANTIOCH 94509 12
800 W 1ST ST ANTIOCH 94509 4
300 H ST ANTIOCH 94509 4
2500 SAN JOSE DR
ANTIOCH, CA 94509
UNITED STATES 4
1 I ST ANTIOCH 94509 4
622 W 2ND ST ANTIOCH 94509 4
5 MARINA PLZ ANTIOCH 94509 3
415 W 2ND ST ANTIOCH 94509 2
105 G ST ANTIOCH 94509 2
5 MARINA PLZ
ANTIOCH, CA 94509
UNITED STATES 2
113 G ST ANTIOCH 94509 2
5065 DEER VALLEY RD ANTIOCH 94531 2

Confidential This document may contain information that identifies individuals, residences and/or vehicles and as such, is considered nonpublic security data. Release of this information is restricted to authorized recipients.

If photo copy is made or if document is released, redact all identifying information.

Page 15 of 15 ends

Printed 02/02/2026 13:43

Attachment E
City of Antioch Downtown Security Survey Results
A digital survey was sent out to the downtown businesses early July via email with the assistance of the Downtown Antioch Association.

City Staff also went downtown door to door and passed out flyers with the Survey QR code.

We received seven responses to the survey, results highlighted below: