Apple Valley City Council
October 25, 2022

APPLE VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL
AGENDA

Tuesday, October 25, 2022, 6:30 p.m.

Council Chamber

PLEASE SILENCE CELL PHONES UPON ENTERING THE CHAMBER

FOR INDIVIDUALS NOT PHYSICALLY PRESENT AND STILL WISHING TO MAKE PUBLIC COMMENTS, YOU MAY COMMENT IN ONE OF TWO WAYS: 1) COMMENTS AND CONTACT INFORMATION CAN BE EMAILED TO [email protected], TO BE INCLUDED IN THE RECORD; 2) A REQUEST TO SPEAK CAN BE EMAILED TO THE SAME

ADDRESS AS ABOVE AND AT THE TIME OF THE REQUESTED AGENDA ITEM, THE TOWN

CLERK WILL PLACE A PHONE CALL TO THE COMMENTER AND ALLOW THEM TO SPEAK TO

THE COUNCIL VIA SPEAKER PHONE DURING THE LIVE MEETING FOR UP TO THREE MINUTES.

The meeting will occur in the Council Chamber located at 14955 Dale Evans Parkway in Apple Valley, California.

This is an agenda for the scheduled meeting of the Town of Apple Valley.

This agenda contains a brief description of each item of business to be considered at today’s meeting. In accordance with the Brown Act, this meeting agenda is posted at least 72 hours prior to the regularly scheduled meeting. The agenda, its supporting documents and all writings received by the Town Council related to these items are public records and available for review during regular business hours in the Town Clerk’s office in the Town Council Chamber. The agenda and its supporting documents, along with live and archived video of the meeting, can be viewed online at http://www.applevalley.org. However, the online agenda may not include all available supporting documents or the most current version of documents.

Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Council after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the Town Clerk’s Office at 14955 Dale Evans Parkway, Apple Valley, CA during normal business hours. Such documents are also available on the Town of Apple Valley website at www.applevalley.org subject to staff’s ability to post the documents before the meeting.

Items listed on the Consent Calendar are expected to be routine and non-controversial and, unless the Town Council directs that an item be held for further discussion, the entire Consent Calendar will be acted upon as the first item of business. If the Town Council directs that an item listed on the Consent Calendar be held for further discussion, the item will be addressed immediately after approval of the Consent Calendar.

In accordance with the Rules of Procedure, members of the public may address the Town Council on any item on the agenda and on any matter that is within the Town Council’s jurisdiction. To address the Town Council regarding an item, complete and submit the yellow card entitled Request to Speak.

Please indicate on the card whether you are speaking under Public Comments or on an item that is listed on the agenda and please list the item number.

When called, approach the podium and if desired, please state your name before giving your presentation. Speakers may address the Town Council for up to three (3) minutes. Speakers are to address the Town Council as a whole through the Presiding Officer. Comments to individual Council Members and/or staff are not permitted.

Individuals, who demonstrate disruptive conduct during Town Council meetings that prevent the Town Council from conducting its meeting in an orderly manner, are guilty of a misdemeanor as stated in PC403, disrupting a public meeting and are subject to removal from the chamber or arrest.

The Town of Apple Valley recognizes its obligation to provide equal access to those individuals with disabilities. Please contact the Town Clerk’s Office at (760) 240-7000 two working days prior to the scheduled meeting for any requests for reasonable accommodations.

Pages

1. Call to Order

2. Opening Ceremonies

2.1. Invocation
Pastor Green - Way of the Cross.

2.2. Pledge of Allegiance

2.3. Presentations

2.3.1. Happy Trails Parade Awards Ceremony - PBID Representative.

2.3.2. The Dangers of Fentanyl - Council Member Curt Emick

3. Public Comments

4. Councilmember Committee/Commission/Community Participation 5 Councilmembers to make brief reports on their participation on committees, boards, and commissions on the Town’s behalf since the last meeting.

Councilmembers may also make brief reports on their community participation.

No formal action will be taken.

5. Town Council Announcements

5.1. Suggested items for next Agenda

5.2. Time, Date & Place for Next Town Council Regular or Special Meeting A. Regular Meeting - November 8, 2022 - Council Chambers Regular Session at 6:30
p.m.

6. Town Council Consent Agenda
Recommended Motion:

To approve the Consent Calendar items numbered 6.1-6.8 as recommended.

6.1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 7
That the Town Council approve the subject minutes as part of the consent agenda.

6.2. ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 559 ”AN ORDINANCE OF THE

TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING CHAPTER 12.20., ENTITLED “SPECIAL SPEED LIMITS” OF TITLE 12 OF THE TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE” 18 Move to adopt Ordinance No. 559, An Ordinance of the Town Council of the Town of Apple Valley, California, amending Chapter 12.20., entitled “special speed limits” of Title 12 of the Town of Apple Valley Municipal Code.”

6.3. ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE 560 OF THE TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING ZONE CHANGE NO. 2021-001 AND
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2021-001 FOR THE VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN 132
Adopt Ordinance No. 560.

6.4. CONSENT TO AWARD THE MUNI ROAD DRIVEWAY AND BOX

CULVERT PROJECT
144
Award a contract to Jergensen Construction, inc. for the Muni Road Driveway and Box Culvert Project subject to "Approval as to Form" by the Town Attorney and "Approval as to Content" by the Town Manager;

6.5. RELEASE OF SECURITIES FOR PARCEL MAP 19705 147
That the Town Council find that the construction of various improvements required for Parcel Map 19705 are complete and approve the 50% reduction of the performance securities and release of the labor and materials security.

6.6. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2022-41, A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN

COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING THE APPLE VALLEY CHOICE ENERGY 2022
INTERGRATED RESOURCE PLAN.
150
Staff recommends that the Town Council adopt Resolution No. 2022-41, approving the Apple Valley Choice Energy 2022 Integrated Resource Plan.

6.7. RATIFICATION OF A FEE WAIVER FOR NO DRUGS AMERICA 201 For good cause shown, and finding a waiver will serve a public purpose, approve the ratification waiving the Park Rental Fees of $1,026.00.

6.8. TO ADJOURN THE TOWN COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULED FOR
NOVEMBER 8, 2022 TO AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING TO BE
HELD ON NOVEMBER 15, 2022
204
To approve adjourning the Town Council Meeting scheduled for Tuesday, November 8, 2022 to an adjourned regular meeting to be held on November 15, 2022.

7. Public Hearings

7.1. SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT TO THE 2021-2022 ACTION PLAN TO

ALLOCATE HOME-ARP FUNDS
205
It is recommended that the Town Council:

A. Conduct a public hearing and upon accepting public testimony; Approve a Substantial Amendment to the 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan to support the Apple Valley-Victorville HOME Consortium by allocating HOME-ARP funds; and
B.

Authorize the Town Manager, or designee, to execute and transmit all necessary documents, including the Substantial Amendment to the Action Plan, and any additional amendments, to assure the Town’s timely expenditure of the Consortium’s HOME-ARP funds.

C.

8. Business of the Council

9. Reports, Requests and Communications

10. Town Manager’s Comments & Legislative Update

11. Closed Session
Recommended Motion:

To Adjourn the regular meeting to move into Closed Session at TIME to discuss the following:

12. Adjournment
Recommended Motion:

To adjourn the meeting of the Apple Valley Town Council at TIME.

TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY

TOWN COUNCIL SERVING ON BOARDS, COMMITTEES & COMMISSIONS

CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMITTEES

HISTORICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (HAC)
Council Member Cusack
Meets every 2nd Tuesday of each month at 9:00 a.m.,
(location may vary)

SPECIAL ADVISORY COMMITTEES
DISASTER PREPAREDNESS*
Mayor - Chairman
Meets quarterly at 1:30 p.m., Town of Apple Valley
Conference Center - Development Services Building
14975 Dale Evans Parkway, Apple Valley.

TRAFFIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE (TAC)
Council Member Nassif
As needed.

Town Council Chambers

TOWN PERSONNEL COMMITTEE
Council Member Nassif
Mayor Pro Tem Bishop
Meets as Needed

PARK AND RECREATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Council Member Nassif
Council Member Emick

AD HOC COMMITTEES

APPLE VALLEY ROAD AD HOC COMMITTEE
Council Member Nassif

VILLAGE MERCHANTS AD HOC COMMITTEE
Council Member Emick

AGENCY - BOARDS/COMMITTEES &

COMMISSIONS

CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS INSURANCE

AUTHORITY (CJPIA)
Council Member Nassif – Director
Exec. Committee meets every 4th Wednesday of each
month at 7:00 p.m., La Palma, CA.

CAL CITIES/DESERT MOUNTAIN DIVISION (DMD)
Council Member Nassif- Voting Delegate
Mayor Pro Tem Bishop – Alternate
Meets as needed, rotating cities.

MOJAVE DESERT AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT

DISTRICT (MDAQMD)
Mayor Leon-– Delegate
Council Member Emick – Alternate
Meets every 4th Monday of each month at 10:00 a.m.,
14306 Park Avenue, Victorville

MOJAVE DESERT AND MOUNTAIN RECYCLING

AUTHORITY
Council Member Cusack – Delegate
Mayor Pro Tem Bishop – Alternate
Meets quarterly on the 2nd Thursday February, May,
August and November at 10:00 a.m.
at the Materials Recovery Facility, 17000 Abbey Lane,
Victorville

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

AUTHORITY (SBCTA)
Mayor Pro Tem Bishop - Board Member
Council Member Cusack – Alternate
Meets 2nd Wednesday of each month at 9:00 a.m.,
I10/I15 Corridor meets 2nd Thursday at 10:00 a.m.
1170 West 3rd St.

San Bernardino

SOLID WASTE ADVISORY TASK FORCE (SWAT)
Council Member Cusack – Committee Member
Julie Ryan - Alternate
Meets as needed on Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m.

Sam J. Racadio Library & Environmental Learning
Center Community Room 7863 Central Ave. Highland

VICTOR VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

AUTHORITY (VVEDA)
(George Air Force Base Reuse Task Force)
Council Member Emick – Commissioner
Mayor Pro Tem Bishop – Alternate
Meets every 2nd Wednesday of each quarter at 5:00
p.m., SCLA

VICTOR VALLEY TRANSIT AUTHORITY (VVTA)
Council Member Emick – Representative
Mayor Leon - Alternate
Meets every 3rd Monday of each month at 9:30 a.m.,
Victorville City Hall

VICTOR VALLEY WASTE WATER RECLAMATION

AUTHORITY (VVWRA)
Council Member Nassif – Commissioner
Mayor Pro Tem Bishop – Alternate
Meets every 3rd Thursday at 7:30 a.m.

VVWRA Offices

GREATER HIGH DESERT CHAMBERS

GOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS COMMITTEE
Mayor Pro Tem Bishop – Representative
Council Member Cusack – Alternate
*These Boards, Committees and
Commissions require the Mayor to serve
as the representative.

Town Council Agenda Report
Date: October 11, 2022
To: Honorable Mayor and Town Council
Subject: APPROVAL OF MINUTES

From: Douglas Robertson, Town Manager
Submitted by: La Vonda M-Pearson, Director of Government Services/Town Clerk Budgeted Item: Yes No N/A

RECOMMENDED ACTION
That the Town Council approve the subject minutes as part of the consent agenda.

SUMMARY:

A. Regular Meeting October 11, 2022

1 Apple Valley Town Council

MINUTES
October 11, 2022, 6:30 p.m.

Council Chamber
Members Present: Mayor Kari Leon
Mayor Pro Tem Art Bishop
Council Member Larry Cusack
Council Member Curt Emick
Council Member Scott Nassif
_____________________________________________________________________

1. Call to Order
Mayor Leon called to order the regular session of the Apple Valley Town Council at 6:30 p.m.

2. Opening Ceremonies

2.1 Invocation
Pastor Joel Brantner - Church of the Valley

2.2 Pledge of Allegiance
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Council Member Nassif.

2.3 Presentations

2.3.1 Employee of the Quarter - Elizabeth Fratt - Recreation Coordinantor
Before proceeding to public comments, Mayor Leon thanked the Town Council and the public for the many thoughts and prayers she received after her accident during the parade. She also wanted to thank the medical personnel who were in attendance and cared for her. She stated that she was feeling much better and glad to be back.

3. Public Comments
Bill McLeod, Apple Valley, commented on the organic waste recycling program.

He recommended additional sizes be made available for residents as the small size cans are not usable for most residents with Apple Valleys large lots.

2 La Vonda M-Pearson, Town Clerk, read a public comment from Ms. Gayle Flinchum, Apple Valley, regarding a shipping container storage yard in unincorporated Apple Valley.

4. Councilmember Committee/Commission/Community Participation Councilmembers to make brief reports on their participation on committees, boards, and commissions on the Town’s behalf since the last meeting.

Councilmembers may also make brief reports on their community participation.

No formal action will be taken.

The Town Council Members each wished the Mayor well in her recovery.

Council Member Cusack commented on committee meetings and events that he attended.

Council Member Emick commented on committee meetings and events that he attended.

Council Member Nassif commented on committee meetings and events that he attended.

Mayor Pro Tem Bishop commented on committee meetings and events that he attended.

Mayor Leon commented on committee meetings and events that she attended.

5. Town Council Announcements

5.1 Suggested items for next Agenda

5.2 Time, Date & Place for Next Town Council Regular or Special Meeting A. Regular Meeting - October 25, 2022 - Council Chambers Regular Session at 6:30 p.m.

6. Town Council Consent Agenda
Council Member Cusack has a remote interest in specific warrants on tonight’s Commercial Warrants dealing with Apple Valley Communications, AV Tech Services or AVCOM Services for the Town of Apple Valley as the owner of these businesses. Therefore, he will be recusing from voting on the warrants for Apple Valley Communications, AV Tech Services and AVCOM Services listed under Agenda Item Number 6.2. In addition, due to his interest in these businesses, Council Member Cusack will be recusing from voting on specific warrants listed under Agenda Item Number 6.2 because these entities are considered sources of income to his businesses. A list of business entities for Council Member

3 Cusack is maintained on file in the Town Clerk’s Office and available for review at the dais.

Council Member Cusack confirmed that he would be recusing from voting on these warrants.

Council Member Nassif has a remote interest in specific warrants on tonight’s Commercial Warrants dealing with NAPA Auto Parts or High Desert Auto Supply for the Town of Apple Valley as the owner of these businesses. Therefore, he will be recusing from voting on the warrants for NAPA Auto Parts and High Desert Auto Supply listed under Agenda Item Number 6.2. In addition, due to his interest in both businesses, Council Member Nassif will also be recusing from voting on specific warrants listed under Agenda Item Number 6.2 because these entities are considered sources of income to his businesses. A list of business entities for Council Member Nassif is maintained on file in the Town Clerk’s Office and available for review at the dais.

Council Member Nassif confirmed that he would be recusing from voting on these warrants.

Mayor Leon has a remote interest in specific warrants on tonight’s Commercial Warrants and has a financial interest in Solution Strategies as a former landlord to this business. Therefore, she will be recusing herself from voting on the warrants for this business.

Mayor Leon confirmed that she would be recusing from voting on these items.

To approve the Consent Calendar items numbered 6.1-6.4 as recommended.

6.1 APPROVAL OF MINUTES
That the Town Council approve the subject minutes as part of the consent agenda.

6.2 SEPTEMBER 2022 COMMERCIAL WARRANTS AND WIRE

TRANSFER SCHEDULES
That the Town Council receive, ratify, and file the Commercial Warrants and Wire Transfer Schedules as presented.

6.3 SEPTEMBER 2022 PAYROLL/BENEFITS WARRANTS SCHEDULE
That the Town Council receive, ratify and file the payroll/benefits warrants as presented.

6.4 AWARD OF A CONTRACT, COLD MIX OVERLAY 2022

4 Award a contract to Calmex Engineering, Inc. for the Cold Mix Overlay 2022 Project subject to "Approval as to Form" by the Town Attorney and "Approval as to Content" by the Town Manager;
Motion by: Council Member Emick
Seconded by: Mayor Pro Tem Bishop
To approve the Consent Calendar items numbered 6.1-6.4 as recommended.

Yes (5): Council Member Cusack, Council Member Emick, Council Member Nassif, Mayor Pro Tem Bishop and Mayor Leon.

Carried (5 to 0)

7. Public Hearings

7.1 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE OF THE TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 8 OF THE TOWN

OF APPLE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING CHAPTERS

8.10, 8.12, 8.16, 8.18, 8.21, 8.22, AND 8.26,
A. Determine that, pursuant to section 15061(b)(3) of the State Guidelines to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the project is exempt from environmental review, stating that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question, the proposed Code Amendment, may have a significant effect on the
environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA.

B. Find the facts presented within the staff report support the required findings for approval of an amendment to the Municipal Code, and adopt the Findings.

C. Find that the proposed Town Ordinance is consistent with the goals and Objectives of the adopted Town of Apple valley General Plan and that it is necessary to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of Apple Valley.

D. Move to waive the reading of Ordinance No. 558 in its entirety and read by title only.

5 E. Introduce Ordinance No. 558, amending Chapters 8.10, 8. 12 &

8.22 of the Municipal Code as it relates to the adoption of the California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Parts 1-12.

F. Direct staff to file a Notice of Exemption.

Mayor Leon opened the public hearing at 7:13 p.m.

Patrick Carroll, Building Official, presented the staff report as filed with the Town Clerk.

There being no requests to speak, Mayor Leon closed the public hearing at 7:21 p.m.

Motion by: Mayor Pro Tem Bishop
Seconded by: Council Member Emick
A. Determine that, pursuant to section 15061(b)(3) of the State Guidelines to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the project is exempt from environmental review, stating that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question, the proposed Code Amendment, may have a significant effect on the
environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA.

B. Find the facts presented within the staff report support the required findings for approval of an amendment to the Municipal Code, and adopt the Findings.

C. Find that the proposed Town Ordinance is consistent with the goals and Objectives of the adopted Town of Apple valley General Plan and that it is necessary to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of Apple Valley.

D. Move to waive the reading of Ordinance No. 558 in its entirety and read by title only.

Yes (5): Council Member Cusack, Council Member Emick, Council Member Nassif, Mayor Pro Tem Bishop and Mayor Leon.

Carried (5 to 0)
La Vonda M-Pearson, Town Clerk, read the title to Ordinance No. 558.

6 Motion by: Mayor Pro Tem Bishop
Seconded by: Council Member Emick
E. Introduce Ordinance No. 558, amending Chapters 8.10, 8. 12 &

8.22 of the Municipal Code as it relates to the adoption of the California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Parts 1-12.

F. Direct staff to file a Notice of Exemption.

Yes (5): Council Member Cusack, Council Member Emick, Council Member Nassif, Mayor Pro Tem Bishop and Mayor Leon.

Carried (5 to 0)

7.2 INTRODUCE ORDINANCE NO. 559” AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN

COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING CHAPTER 12.20., ENTITLED “SPECIAL SPEED LIMITS” OF TITLE 12 OF THE TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE” A. Move to waive the reading of Ordinance 559 in its entirety and read by title only.

B. Move to Introduce No. 559 An Ordinance of the Town Council of the Town of Apple Valley, California, amending Chapter 12.20., entitled “special speed limits” of Title 12 of the Town of Apple Valley Municipal Code.”
Mayor Leon opened the public hearing at 7:24 p.m.

Mike Podegracz, Town Engineer, presented the staff report as filed with the Town Clerk.

There being no requests to speak, Mayor Leon closed the public hearing at 7:29 p.m.

Motion by: Council Member Emick
Seconded by: Council Member Cusack
A. Move to waive the reading of Ordinance 559 in its entirety and read by title only.

Yes (5): Council Member Cusack, Council Member Emick, Council Member Nassif, Mayor Pro Tem Bishop and Mayor Leon.

Carried (5 to 0)

7 La Vonda M-Pearson, Town Clerk, read the title to Ordinance No. 559.

Motion by: Council Member Nassif
Seconded by: Council Member Cusack
B. Move to Introduce No. 559 An Ordinance of the Town Council of the Town of Apple Valley, California, amending Chapter 12.20., entitled “special speed limits” of Title 12 of the Town of Apple Valley Municipal Code.”
Yes (5): Council Member Cusack, Council Member Emick, Council Member Nassif, Mayor Pro Tem Bishop and Mayor Leon.

Carried (5 to 0)

7.3 ADOPTION OF THE VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN AND ASSOCIATED

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) - GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT NO. 2021-002; ZONE CHANGE NO. 2021-001; SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2021-001
A. Adopt environmental findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations, certify the Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2021110271), and adopt a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Village Specific Plan.

B. Approve GPA No. 2021-002; ZC No. 2021-001; SP No. 2021-001 This General Plan Amendment will represent the 2nd General Plan Amendment Cycle
Council Member Cusack announced that he had a potential conflict of interest in this item as a property owner in the subject area and therefore would recuse himself from voting on this item.

Council Member Nassif announced that he had a potential conflict of interest in this item as a property owner in the subject area and therefore he too would recuse himself from voting on this item.

COUNCIL MEMBER CUSACK WAS EXCUSED FROM THE DAIS AT
7:30 P.M.

8 COUNCIL MEMBER NASSIF WAS EXCUSED FROM THE DAIS AT
7:30 P.M.

Mayor Leon opened the public hearing at 7:30 p.m.

Nicole Criste, Principal, Terra Nova Planning & Research, presented the staff report as filed with the Town Clerk.

Rob Kilpatrick, Engineer, continued the powerpoint presentation discussing the proposed use of roundabouts in the village area for efficiency with traffic flows.

Ms. Criste concluded the presentation stating that there was a minor change in the boundary lines for the proposed specific plan as reflected in the draft which removed 15 property owners who elected not to be a part of the proposal.

Charity Schiller, Attorney, stated that in response to fish and wildlife concerns, mitigations measures were addressed and resolved.

Delshawn McClellon, Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters, was called for public comment. Mr. McClellon commented on the proposed project and its impact on union workers.

There being no additional requests to speak, Mayor Leon closed the public hearing at 8:27 p.m.

MOTION
Motion by: Mayor Pro Tem Bishop
Seconded by: Council Member Emick
A. Adopt Resolution Number 2022-40 Certifying the Environmental Impact Report (Sch # 2021110271) For the Village Specific Plan Project; Adopting Environmental Findings Pursuant To the California Environmental Quality Act; Adopting the Statement of Overriding Considerations; And Adopting A Mitigation Monitoring And Reporting Program
Yes (3): Council Member Emick, Mayor Pro Tem Bishop and Mayor Leon.

Absent: Council Member Cusack and Council Member Nassif.

Carried (3 to 0)
MOTION

9 Motion by: Council Member Emick
Seconded by: Mayor Pro Tem Bishop
B. Move To Waive the Reading of Ordinance No. 560 in Its Entirety and Read by Title Only.

Yes (3): Council Member Emick, Mayor Pro Tem Bishop and Mayor Leon.

Absent: Council Member Cusack and Council Member Nassif.

Carried (3 to 0)
La Vonda M-Pearson, Town Clerk, read the title to Ordinance No. 560.

MOTION
Motion by: Mayor Pro Tem Bishop
Seconded by: Council Member Emick
C. Introduce Ordinance No. 560, An Ordinance of the Town of Apple Valley, California, Adopting Zone Change No. 2021-001 And Specific Plan No. 2021-001 For the Village Specific Plan; and Adopt Resolution No. 2022-39, Adopting General Plan Amendment No. 2021-002 For the Village Specific Plan
Yes (3): Council Member Emick, Mayor Pro Tem Bishop and Mayor Leon.

Absent: Council Member Cusack and Council Member Nassif.

Carried (3 to 0)
COUNCIL MEMBER CUSACK RETURNED TO THE DAIS AT 8:29 P.M.

COUNCIL MEMBER NASSIF RETURNED TO THE DAIS AT 8:29 P.M.

8. Business of the Council

8.1 SECOND AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT BETWEEN THE TOWN OF
APPLE VALLEY AND DOUGLAS B. ROBERTSON, TOWN MANAGER
Approval of the Second Amendment to the Employment Agreement between the Town of Apple Valley and Douglas Robertson.

Thomas Rice, Town Attorney, presented the staff report as filed with the Town Clerk.

Motion by: Mayor Pro Tem Bishop
Seconded by: Council Member Emick

10 Approval of the Second Amendment to the Employment Agreement between the Town of Apple Valley and Douglas Robertson.

Yes (5): Council Member Cusack, Council Member Emick, Council Member Nassif, Mayor Pro Tem Bishop and Mayor Leon.

Carried (5 to 0)

9. Reports, Requests and Communications

10. Town Manager’s Comments & Legislative Update
Orlando Acevedo, Assistant Town Manager, on behalf of the Town of Apple Valley staff, stated that the Town was glad to see the Mayor feeling well. He provided an update of current events, upcoming events and activities in the Town of Apple Valley.

11. Closed Session
To adjourn the regular meeting to move into Closed Session at 8:35 p.m. to discuss the following:

11.1 CLOSED SESSION
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION
(Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9) Name of Case:

Nerses Shahinyan v. Town of Apple Valley, San Bernardino Superior Court, Case No. CIVSB2203397
Upon returning from Closed Session at 8:50 p.m., Mayor Leon announced that there was no reportable action taken.

12. Adjournment
To adjourn the meeting of the Apple Valley Town Council at 8:51 p.m.

Kari Leon, Mayor La Vonda M-Pearson, Town Clerk

Town Council Agenda Report
Date: October 25, 2022
To: Honorable Mayor and Town Council
Subject: ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 559 ”AN ORDINANCE OF THE

TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING CHAPTER 12.20., ENTITLED “SPECIAL SPEED LIMITS” OF TITLE 12 OF THE TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE” From: Douglas Robertson, Town Manager
Submitted by: Mike Podegracz, Town Engineer
Engineering
Budgeted Item: Yes No N/A

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Move to adopt Ordinance No. 559, An Ordinance of the Town Council of the Town of Apple Valley, California, amending Chapter 12.20., entitled “special speed limits” of Title 12 of the Town of Apple Valley Municipal Code.”

BACKGROUND
As part of the requirements to adopt any new Ordinance, Ordinance No. 559 has been scheduled for adoption this Town Council meeting.

ANALYSIS
At the October 11, 2022, Council meeting, the Town Council reviewed and introduced Ordinance No. 559. Ordinance No. 559 amends Section 12.20.020 of Chapter 12.20, “Special Speed Limits” of Title 12 of the Town of Apple Valley Municipal Code.

FISCAL IMPACT
To facilitate the change of speed limit the new signs will come from our sign inventory, and the current signs will go back into the sign inventory. Funding has been included for sign installations in the adopted Fiscal Year 2022/23 Budget.

ATTACHMENTS
A. Ordinance 559
B. 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey prepared by KOA Corporation.

ORDINANCE NO. 559

AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN

OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER

12.20, ENTITLED “SPECIAL SPEED LIMITS” OF TITLE 12

OF THE TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE
WHEREAS, the California Vehicle Code, including, but not limited to, sections 22357 and 22358, authorizes local authorities to increase or decrease local speed limits upon the basis of conducting an engineering and traffic survey; and WHEREAS, State regulations require that local authorities review changes in local speed limits on a periodic basis to determine if the speed limits require updating; and WHEREAS, the Town currently regulates speed limits in the Town of Apple Valley pursuant to State law under Chapter 12.20 of the Apple Valley Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Town has determined that seven segments currently included in section 12.20.020 of the Murrieta Municipal Code require updating, maintaining the current speed limit for five of the segments; and decreasing the speed limit for two segments; and
WHEREAS, nine segments not previously included in section 12.20.020 require a new speed limit; and
WHEREAS, the desire to ensure the orderly movement of traffic in a reasonable and safe manner through appropriate speed limits requires the Council to take action.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Town Council of the Town of Apple Valley, California, does ordain as follows:

Section 1. Chapter 12.20 entitled “SPECIAL SPEED LIMITS” of Title 12 of the Town of Apple Valley Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
“Chapter 12.20

SPECIAL SPEED LIMITS

12.20.010 Basis Of Change Or Determination........................................ The prima facie
speed limit declared for each street or portion thereof designated in section

12.20.020 is a speed limit which is either an increase from the prima facie speed limit or a decrease from the maximum speed limit otherwise applicable to such street or portion thereof pursuant to Chapter 7 of Division 11 of the Vehicle Code of the State (commencing at section 22348 thereof). The increase or decrease has been determined upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey. For each street or portion thereof upon which an increase in the prima facie speed limit (otherwise

Ordinance No. 559
applicable) has been declared, a determination has been made that the increased declared prima facie speed limit is the most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe. For each street or portion thereof upon which a decrease from the maximum speed limit (otherwise applicable) has been made and a lower speed limit declared as the prima facie speed limit, a determination has been made that the maximum speed limit (otherwise applicable) is more than is reasonable or safe, and that the declared prima facie speed limit is most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe.

12.20.020 Changes In State Law Speed Limits...................................... The prima facie
speed limit declared in this section for each street or portion of a street designated shall be effective from and after the posting of appropriate signs giving notice thereof. The names of the streets upon which special prima facie speed limits are hereby declared, the portion of such streets affected by the declaration, and the declared prima facie speed limits therefor is as follows:

Name of Street Portion Affected Speed Limit (in miles per hour) Declared Prima Facie
Algonquin Road From Bear Valley Road to Sitting Bull Road 35 Apple Valley Road From Bear Valley Road to Town Center Drive 50 Apple Valley Road From Bear Valley Road to Pimlico Road 50 Apple Valley Road From Pimlico Road to Yucca Loma Road 55 Apple Valley Road From Yucca Loma Road to Symeron Road 55 Apple Valley Road From Symeron Road to Hwy 18 50
Apple Valley Road From Town Center Drive to Arroyo Mesa Lane 45 Bear Valley Road From the Western Town Limits to the Lowe’s Entrance Signal
50 Bear Valley Road From the Lowe’s Entrance Signal to Kiowa Road 55 Bear Valley Road From Kiowa Road to Navajo Road 55
Bear Valley Road From Navajo Road to Eastern Town Limits 55 Central Road From Bear Valley Road to Highway 18 55
Dale Evans Pkwy From Highway 18 to Thunderbird Road 45
Del Oro Road From Apple Valley Road to Deep Creek Road 45 Flathead Road From Tonawanda Road to Highway 18 45
Flathead Road From Highway 18 to Ramona Avenue 45
Iroquois Road From Pah-Ute Road to Rancherias Road 35
Jess Ranch Parkway From Town Center Drive to Bear Valley Road 35 Kamana Road From Apple Valley Road to Tao Road 45
Kiowa Road From Bear Valley Road to State Highway 18 45 Kiowa Road From Highway 18 to Navajo Road 45
Kiowa Road From Bear Valley Road to Tussing Ranch Road 50 Mohawk Road From Tussing Ranch Road to Bear Valley Road 50 Mondamon Road From Highway 18 to Apple Valley Road 45

Ordinance No. 559
Nanticoke Road From Ramona Ave to Thunderbird Road 40
Nokomis Road From Symeron Road to Riverside Dr. 40
Navajo Road From State Highway 18 to Ottawa Road 40
Navajo Road From Bear Valley Road to Ottawa Road 50
Navajo Road From State Highway 18 to 300’- North of Pineridge Road
45 Navajo Road 300’- North of Pineridge Road to Thunderbird Road 50 Otoe Road From Rancherias Road to Dale Evans Parkway 50 Ottawa Road From Rincon Road to Kiowa Road 40
Ottawa Road From Kiowa Road to Navajo Road 45
Ottawa Road From Navajo Road to Central Road 40
Powhatan Road From Navajo Road to Central Road 40
Ramona Ave From Navajo Road to Central Road 45
Ramona Ave From Standing Rock Ave to Thunderbird Road 40 Ramona Ave From Navajo Road to Central Road 45
Rancherias Road From Highway 18 to Tomahawk Road 45
Rancherias Road From Tomahawk Road to Erie Road 35
Rancherias Road From Erie Road to Yucca Loma Road 45
Rimrock Road From Corwin Road to Hwy 18 40
Rimrock Road East From Highway 18 to Rancherias Road 45 Rincon Road From Sitting Bull Road to Rancherias Road 45 Riverside Drive From Sahale Lane to Branding Iron Road 40 Seneca Road From Apple Valley Road to Riverside Dr. 45
Seneca Road From Apple Valley Road to Rancherias Road 45 Shoshonee Road From Apple Valley Road to Seminole Road 45 Sitting Bull Road From Apple Valley Road to Valley View Court 45 Sitting Bull Road From Valley View Court to Kiowa Road 45 Sitting Bull Road From Kiowa Road to Navajo Road 45
South Road From Central Road to Mesquite Road 50
Standing Rock Ave From Outer Highway 18 to Navajo Road 50 Symeron Road From Apple Valley Road to Riverside Dr. 35 Thunderbird Road From Dale Evans Parkway to Navajo Road 50 Thunderbird Road From Rancherias Road to Dale Evans Parkway 45 Tomahawk Road From Rancherias Road to Mandan Road 45
Tonikan Road From Ramona Ave to Thunderbird Road 40
Tuscola Road From Apple Valley Road to Nokomis Road 45
Waalew Road From Corwin Road to Dale Evans Pkwy 55
Yucca Loma Road From Apple Valley Road to Rincon Road 45 Yucca Loma Road From Rincon Road to Kiowa Road 45
Yucca Loma Road From Kiowa Road to Navajo Road 45
Zuni Road From Rancherias Road to Dale Evans Pkwy 45

Ordinance No. 559
Spring Valley Lake
Equestrian Area
For the area bound by: North of Bear Valley Road,
east of West Town limits, south of Ottawa Road,
west of Apple Valley Road
35 Area north of Bear
Valley at Multnomah
Road
For the area of: Multnomah Road, Caddo Road and
Klamath Road
30 Area south of Bear
Valley Road at
Laguna Road
For the area of: Bear Valley Road on the north,
Kiowa Road on the West, Sandia Road on the
south, and Mohawk Road on the east”
35 SECTION 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective thirty days from and after its adoption.

SECTION 3. Notice of Adoption. The Town Clerk of the Town of Apple Valley shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause publication to occur in a newspaper of general circulation and published and circulated in the Town in a manner permitted under section 36933 of the Government Code.

APPROVED and ADOPTED by the Town Council of the Town of Apple Valley and signed by the Mayor and attested by the Town Clerk this 25th day of October, 2022. _________________________________
Kari Leon, Mayor
ATTEST:

La Vonda M-Pearson, Town Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
____________________________ __________________________________ Thomas Rice, Town Attorney Orlando Acevedo, Assistant Town Manager

Final Report
Engineering and Traffic Surveys
Prepared for
Town of Apple Valley, CA
Engineering Department
14955 Dale Evans Parkway
Apple Valley, CA 92307
Prepared by:

September 09th, 2022
5095 Murphy Canyon Road, Suite 330, San Diego, CA 92123 T: 619.683.2933 | F: 619.683.7982 | www.koacorp.com

MONTEREY PARK ORANGE ONTARIO SAN DIEGO

9.9.22

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
September 9, 2022 Page 1 of 22
Table of Contents

1.0 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................ 2

2.0 PURPOSE .................................................................................................................. 2

3.0 APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE ........................................... 3

3.1. BASIC SPEED LAW (CVC 22350)............................................................................ 3

3.2. SPEED LAW VIOLATIONS (CVC 22351) ................................................................. 3

3.3. PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS (CVC 22352)............................................................. 3

3.4. INCREASE OF LOCAL LIMITS TO 65 MILES PER HOUR (CVC 22357)...................... 4

3.5. DECREASE OF LOCAL SPEED LIMITS (CVC 22358)................................................. 5

3.6. DECREASE ON NARROW STREET (CVC 22358.3) .................................................. 5

3.7. DOWNWARD SPEED ZONING (CVC 22358.5)....................................................... 5

3.8. BOUNDARY LINE STREETS (CVC 22359)................................................................ 5

3.9. NOTICE OF AUTHORIZATION TO INCREASE MAXIMUM SPEED LIMIT (CVC 22366) ............................................................................................................................. 6

3.10. SPEED TRAP PROHIBITION (CVC 40801)........................................................... 6

3.11. SPEED TRAPS (CVC 40802)................................................................................ 6

3.12. SPEED TRAP EVIDENCE (CVC 40803)................................................................. 8

4.0 ELEMENTS OF AN ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY ......................................... 9

4.1. SPEED SAMPLING ................................................................................................. 9

4.2. SPEED LIMITS...................................................................................................... 10

4.3. DATA COLLECTION.............................................................................................. 10

4.4. PROCEDURES...................................................................................................... 11

4.5. COLLISION HISTORY............................................................................................ 13

4.6. CONDITIONS NOT READILY APPARENT TO MOTORISTS .................................... 15

5.0 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................................ 17

5.1. Apple Valley Rd between Yucca Loma Rd and Seneca Rd ................................. 18

5.2. Apple Valley Rd between Seneca Rd and Highway 18....................................... 18

5.3. Nanticoke Rd between Ramona Ave and Thunderbird Rd ................................ 18

5.4. Powhatan Rd between Navajo Rd and Central Rd............................................. 18

5.5. Ramona Ave between Navajo Rd and Central Rd.............................................. 19

5.6. Ramona Ave between Navajo Rd and Standing Rock Ave................................. 19

5.7. Ramona Ave between Standing Rock Ave and Thunderbird Rd........................ 19

5.8. Rimrock Rd between Corwin Rd and Highway 18.............................................. 20

5.9. Seneca Rd between Apple Valley Rd and Riverside Dr...................................... 20

5.10. Symeron Rd between Apple Valley Rd and Riverside Dr................................ 20

5.11. Tonikan Rd between Ramona Ave and Thunderbird Rd ................................ 20

5.12. Yucca Loma Rd between Kiowa Rd and Rincon Rd ........................................ 21

5.13. Yucca Loma Rd between Rincon Rd and Apple Valley Rd .............................. 21

5.14. Nokomis Rd between Symeron Rd and Riverside Dr ..................................... 21

5.15. Waalew Rd between Corwin Rd and Dale Evans Pkwy .................................. 22

5.16. Ottawa Rd between Navajo Rd and Central Rd ............................................. 22

6.0 APPENDIX............................................................................................................... 22

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
September 9, 2022 Page 2 of 22

1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report has been prepared by KOA Corporation for the Town of Apple Valley to present the results and recommendations of an engineering and traffic survey for 16 roadway segments in the Town of Apple Valley, CA. The engineering and traffic survey was conducted in accordance with the California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 627 and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA-MUTCD), last updated in March 30, 2021 Rev.6. These Engineering and Traffic Surveys (E&TS) have been conducted to determine the appropriate speed limitsfor radar speed enforcement in the Town of Apple Valley. Some of the street segments are posted 35 miles per hour in the Town without a speed survey (aka “Legacy Street” speed) while there are a few locations that are not posted and are considered Prima Facie 55 MPH. This E&TS recommends the posted speed for those streets as well.

The new laws for 2022 are listed in blue below:

Pursuant to California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 40802, as amended by AB 43 with effective date January 1, 2022, radar or other electronically collected evidence is invalid if the speed limit was not justified by an E&TS conducted within five years prior to the alleged violation, or within seven years if the arresting officer had completed a training course and used calibrated electronic equipment. An E&TS may be valid as long as 14 years if a registered engineer determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred. If the required surveys are more than 5, 7, or 14 years old, the court may reject the evidence of speeding obtained by use of radar under CVC Section 40802 and 627, and Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA-MUTCD).

2.0 PURPOSE
A speed zone survey is required to establish the appropriate speed limit for a street per California Vehicle Code Section 40802(b) speed limits established under Sections 22352(b) 1, 22354, 22357, 22358, and 22358.3.

New CVC Section 22358.6, created with the passage of Assembly Bill 43, became effective January 1, 2022 and reads:
22358.6 The Department of Transportation shall, in the next scheduled revision, revise and thereafter maintain the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices to require the Department of Transportation or a local authority to round speed limits to the nearest five miles per hour of the 85th percentile of the free-flowing traffic. However, in cases in which the speed limit needs to be rounded up to the nearest five miles per hour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, the Department of Transportation or a local authority may decide to instead round down the speed limit to the lower five miles per hour increment. A local authority may additionally lower the speed limit as provided in Sections 22358.7 and 22358.8. (Added by Stats. 2021, Ch. 690, Sec. 6. (AB 43) Effective January 1, 2022.)

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
September 9, 2022 Page 3 of 22
New CVC Section 22358.7, also passed through AB 43, would allow a further 5 miles per hour reduction in the speed limit for designated safety corridors or where high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians are present. However, a local authority may not lower a speed limit as authorized by this section until June 30, 2024 or until an online tool for adjudicating infraction violations statewide is developed. For the purposes of this E&TS, this CVC section will not be applied.

In contrast, new CVC Section 22358.8(a) is immediately applicable. It reads:
22358.8 (a) If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, retain the current speed limit or restore the immediately prior speed limit if that speed limit was established with an engineering and traffic survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit.

3.0 APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE

3.1. BASIC SPEED LAW (CVC 22350)
No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.

3.2. SPEED LAW VIOLATIONS (CVC 22351)
(a) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway in excess of the limits specified in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is lawful unless clearly proved to be in violation of the basic speed law.
(b) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway in excess of the prima facie speed limits in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is prima facie unlawful unless the defendant establishes by competent evidence that the speed in excess of said limits did not constitute a violation of the basic speed law at the time, place and under the conditions then existing.

3.3. PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS (CVC 22352)
The prima facie limits are as follows and the same shall be applicable unless changed as authorized in this code and, if so changed, only when signs have been erected giving notice thereof:
(a) 15 miles per hour

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
September 9, 2022 Page 4 of 22
1) When traversing a railway grade crossing, if during the last 100 feet of the approach to the crossing the driver does not have clear and unobstructed view of the crossing and of any traffic on the railway for a distance of 400 feet in both directions along such railway.

This subdivision does not apply in the case of any railway grade crossing where a human flagman is on duty or a clearly visible electrical or mechanical railway crossing signal device is installed but does not then indicate the immediate approach of a railway train or car.
2) When traversing any intersection of highways, if during the last 100 feet of his approach to the intersection, the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the intersection and of any traffic upon all of the highways entering the intersection for a distance of 100 feet along all such highways, except at an intersection protected by stop signs or yield right‐of‐way signs or controlled by official traffic controlsignals. 3) On any alley.
(b) 25 miles per hour
1) On any highway other than a state highway, in any business or residence district unless a different speed is determined by local authority under procedures set forth in this code. 2) When passing a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. Such prima facie limit shall also apply when passing any school grounds which are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign.

3.4. INCREASE OF LOCAL LIMITS TO 65 MILES PER HOUR (CVC 22357) (a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that a speed greater than 25 miles per hour would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe upon any street other than a state highway otherwise subject to a prima facie limit of 25 miles per hour, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, or 60 miles per hour or a maximum speed limit of 65 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe. The declared prima facie or maximum speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street and shall not thereafter be revised except upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey. This section does not apply to any 25‐mile‐per‐hour prima facie limit which is applicable when passing a school building or the grounds thereof or when passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens.
(b) This section shall become operative on the date specified in subdivision (c) of Section 22366.

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
September 9, 2022 Page 5 of 22

3.5. DECREASE OF LOCAL SPEED LIMITS (CVC 22358)
(a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the limit of 65 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of any street other than a state highway where the limit of 65 miles per hour is applicable, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 60, 55, 50, 45, 40, 35, 30, or 25 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe, which declared prima facie limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street.
(b) This section shall become operative on the date specified in subdivision (c) of Section 22366.

3.6. DECREASE ON NARROW STREET (CVC 22358.3)
Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour in a business or residence district or in a public park on any street having a roadway not exceeding 25 feet in width, other than a state highway, is more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance or resolution determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 20 or 15 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate and is reasonable and safe. The declared prima facie limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street.

3.7. DOWNWARD SPEED ZONING (CVC 22358.5)
It is the intent of the Legislature that physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning, as the basic rule of Section 22350 is sufficient regulation as to such conditions.

3.8. BOUNDARY LINE STREETS (CVC 22359)
With respect to boundary line streets and highways where portions thereof are within different jurisdictions, no ordinance adopted under Sections 22357 and 22358 shall be effective as to any such portion until all authorities having jurisdiction of the portions of the street concerned have approved the same. This section shall not apply in the case of boundary line streets consisting of separate roadways within different jurisdictions.

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
September 9, 2022 Page 6 of 22

3.9. NOTICE OF AUTHORIZATION TO INCREASE MAXIMUM SPEED LIMIT(CVC 22366)
(a) Whenever the Director of Transportation determines the date upon which the state may establish a maximum speed limit of 65 miles per hour on highways without subjecting the state to a reduction in the amount of federal aid for highways, the director shall notify the Secretary of State of that determination.
(b) The notice required under subdivision (a) shall state that it is being made pursuant to this section.
(c) The notice shall specify a date which is either the date determined pursuant to subdivision (a), or a later date designated by the director.

3.10. SPEED TRAP PROHIBITION (CVC 40801)
No peace officer or other person shall use a speed trap in arresting, or participating or assisting in the arrest of, any person for any alleged violation of this code nor shall any speed trap be used in securing evidence as to the speed of any vehicle for the purpose of an arrest or prosecution under this code.

3.11. SPEED TRAPS (CVC 40802)
(a) A "speed trap" is either of the following:
(1) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the knowndistance. (2) A particular section of a highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under subparagraph (A) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects. This paragraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone. (b) (1) For purposes of this section, a local street or road is defined by the latest functional usage and federal‐aid system maps submitted to the federal Highway Administration, except that when these maps have not been submitted, or when the street or road is not shown on the maps, a "local street or road" means a street or road that primarily provides access to abutting residential property and meets the following three conditions:

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
September 9, 2022 Page 7 of 22
(A) Roadway width of not more than 40 feet.
(B) Not more than one‐half of a mile of uninterrupted length. Interruptions shall include official traffic control signals as defined in Section 445. (C) Not more than one traffic lane in each direction.
(2) For purposes of this section "school zone" means that area approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. "School zone" also includes the area approaching or passing any school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children if that highway is posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign. (c) (1) When all of the following criteria are met, paragraph (2) of this subdivision shall be applicable and subdivision (a) shall not be applicable:
(A) When radar is used, the arresting officer has successfully completed a radar operator course of not less than 24 hours on the use of police traffic radar, and the course was approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. (B) When laser or any other electronic device is used to measure the speed of moving objects, the arresting officer has successfully completed the training required in subparagraph (A) and an additional training course of not less than two hours approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. (C) (i) The prosecution proved that the arresting officer complied with subparagraphs (A) and (B) and that an engineering and traffic survey has been conducted in accordance with subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2). The prosecution proved that, prior to the officer issuing the notice to appear, the arresting officer established that the radar, laser, or other electronic device conformed to the requirements of subparagraph (D). (ii) The prosecution proved the speed of the accused was unsafe for the conditions present at the time of alleged violation unless the citation was for a violation of Section 22349, 22356, or 22406.
(D) The radar, laser, or other electronic device used to measure the speed of the accused meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within the three years prior to the date of the alleged violation by an independent certified laser or radar repair and testing or calibration facility.
(2) A "speed trap" is either of the following:

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
September 9, 2022 Page 8 of 22
(A) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the knowndistance. (B) (i) A particular section of a highway or state highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under subparagraph (A) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within one of the following time periods, prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects:
(I) Except as specified in subclause (II), seven years. (II) If an engineering and traffic survey was conducted more than seven years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume, 10 years.
(ii) This subparagraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone.

3.12. SPEED TRAP EVIDENCE (CVC 40803)
(a) No evidence as to the speed of a vehicle upon a highway shall be admitted in any court upon the trial of any person in any prosecution under this code upon a charge involving the speed of a vehicle when the evidence is based upon or obtained from or by the maintenance or use of a speed trap.
(b) In any prosecution under this code of a charge involving the speed of a vehicle, where enforcement involves the use of radar or other electronic devices which measure the speed of moving objects, the prosecution shall establish, as part of its prima facie case, that the evidence or testimony presented is not based upon a speed trap as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802.
(c) When a traffic and engineering survey is required pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802, evidence that a traffic and engineering survey has been conducted within five years of the date of the alleged violation or evidence that the offense was committed on a local street or road as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802 shall constitute a prima facie case that the evidence or testimony is not based upon a speed trap as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802.

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
September 9, 2022 Page 9 of 22

4.0 ELEMENTS OF AN ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Engineering and Traffic Surveys are required by the State of California to establish intermediate speed limits on public streets and to enforce those limits using radar or other speed measuring devices. This engineering and traffic survey was conducted in accordance with California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 627 and California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA-MUTCD, last updated in March 30, 2021 Rev.6.).

The California Vehicle Code (CVC) directs the methodology used for completing Engineering and Traffic Surveys to include an evaluation of current vehicle speeds, crash history and conditions not readily apparent to motorists. The basic elements of the speed zone study are discussed in more detail as follows.

This Engineering and Traffic Survey is intended to be the basis for the establishment, revision, and enforcement of speed limits for several roadways. This survey was requested by the Town of Apple Valley so that posted speed limits can be updated or established to enable the Police Department and/or other law enforcement to use radar for speed enforcement. Engineering and traffic surveys that support the prima facie speed limit are required by Sections 40801 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) before enforcement by radar is applied. The law further specifies that these surveys be conducted every five years. This provision assures that posted speed limits are kept reasonably current.

The CVC (Section 40802) offers an exception to the required survey on local streets as defined by federal‐aid system maps submitted to the Federal Highway Administration. If maps have not been submitted, local streets are defined as those streets primarily providing access to abutting residential property and meeting the following three conditions:

1. Roadway width of not more than 40 feet.

2. Not more than one‐half mile of uninterrupted length (interruptions include stop signs or traffic signals).

3. Not more than one traffic lane in each direction.

These engineering and traffic surveys were conducted in accordance with procedures outlined in the California Department of Transportation’s Traffic Manual, as required by Section 627 of the California Vehicle Code. The code further specifies the elements of an engineering and traffic survey to include:

4.1. SPEED SAMPLING
Existing vehicle speeds were surveyed through the use of a recently calibrated radar device. Speed samples were taken for each segment representing a significant sample of current traffic. This data was then evaluated to identify the distribution of traffic. A key element in the evaluation is the identification of the 85th percentile speed. This is the

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
September 9, 2022 Page 10 of 22
speed that represents the speed at which 85 percent of the traffic travel at or below. This level of travel speed represents what is assumed to be a behavior by motorists which is safe and reasonable.

4.2. SPEED LIMITS
Posted speed limits are primarily established to protect the general public from the unreasonable behavior of reckless, unreliable, or otherwise dangerous drivers. They provide law enforcement with the means to identify and apprehend violators of the basic speed law (CVC Section 22350). This statute states that "No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property." The basic fundamentals for establishing speed limits recognize that the majority of drivers behave in a safe and reasonable manner, and that the normally careful and competent actions of a reasonable driver should be considered legal. Speed limits established on these fundamentals conform to the consensus of those who drive the highway as to what speed is reasonable and safe, and are not dependent on the judgment of one or a few individuals. A speed survey is usually used to determine the prevailing speed of reasonable drivers.

Speed limits are also established to advise of conditions which may not be readily apparent to a reasonable driver. For this reason, collision history, roadway conditions, traffic characteristics, and adjacent land use must also be analyzed before determining speed limits. Speed limit changes are usually coordinated with visible changes in roadway conditions or roadside developments. Unusually short zones of less than one‐half mile in length should be avoided to reduce confusion.

Additionally, it is generally accepted that speed limits cannot be successfully enforced without voluntary compliance by a majority of drivers. Consequently, only the driver whose behavior is clearly out of line with the normal flow of traffic is usually considered a violator for enforcement purposes.

4.3. DATA COLLECTION
Data was obtained regarding the prevailing speed of vehicles, traffic collisions, visibility restrictions, and roadway conditions within the community. Speed measurements were conducted at various dates using a certified radar gun between May 10, 2022 and May 19, 2022.

The criteria and operational procedures described below were used to measure vehicle speeds with radar devices on selected street segments along each surveyed roadway.

Traffic in both directions was recorded at each location. The specific location on each street segment was selected after considering the following:

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
September 9, 2022 Page 11 of 22

1. Minimum stop sign and traffic signal influence.

2. Minimum visibility restrictions.

3. Non‐congested traffic flow away from intersections and driveways.

4. Minimum influence from curves or other roadway conditions that would affect the normal operation of a vehicle.

All surveys were conducted in good weather conditions during off‐peak periods. A sample of 100 vehicles(50 vehicles in each direction), and at a few low volume locations a sample of 50 vehicles (25 vehicles in each direction) was obtained on each roadway segment surveyed.

4.4.PROCEDURES
The results of the speed measurements were computed and analyzed and are summarized in this report. Significant values obtained from the computations are as follows:

The critical speed, or 85th Percentile Speed, is that speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is moving. A key element in the evaluation is the identification of the 85th percentile speed. This is the speed that represents the speed at which 85 percent of the traffic travel at or below. This level of travel speed represents what is assumed to be a behavior by motorists which is safe and reasonable. Therefore, a "basic speed limit" is established at the nearest 5‐mile‐per‐hour increment of the 85th percentile speed. For example, if the 85th percentile speed is 38 miles per hour, the basic speed limit becomes 40 miles per hour. If the 85th percentile speed is 37 miles per hour, the basic speed limit is 35 miles per hour.

The Median Speed, or 50th Percentile Speed, represents the mid‐point value within the range of recorded speeds for a particular roadway location. As such, 50% of the vehicles travel faster than, and 50% travel slower than, the median speed.

The 10 MPH Pace is the 10 miles per hour increment range, which contains the largest number of recorded vehicles. The pace is a measure of the dispersion of speeds within the sample surveyed. Speed limits are normally set to fall within the 10 MPH pace.

However, conditions not readily apparent to the driver or adhering to State mandated limits such as in the Residential Districts may require setting speed limits below the 10 MPH pace.

The results are summarized in Table 1. All data collection sheets are included in the Appendices.

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
Table 1: Speed Survey Results
Line
No. Street Segment
Existing
Posted Speed
Limit (MPH)
85th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)
50th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)
10 MPH
Pace Speed
Range
(MPH)
Percent in
Pace (%)
1 Apple Valley Rd Yucca Loma Rd to Symeron Rd 55 54 50 45 - 54 79% 1A Symeron Rd to Hwy 18 55 51 47 40 - 49 79%
2 Nanticoke Rd Ramona Ave to Thunderbird Rd Prima Facie 55 44 38 35 - 44 57% 3 Powhatan Rd Navajo Rd to Central Rd 45 42 37 32 - 41 75% 4 Ramona Ave Navajo Rd to Central Rd 45 48 43 39 - 48 69% 5 Ramona Ave Navajo Rd to Standing Rock Ave 35 43 38 35 - 44 68% 5A Ramona Ave Standing Rock Ave to Thunderbird Rd 35 42 35 28 - 37 64% 6 Rimrock Rd Corwin Rd to Hwy 18 35 44 38 35 - 44 68%
7 Seneca Rd Apple Valley Rd to Riverside Dr 35 45 38 32 - 41 61% 8 Symeron Rd Apple Valley Rd to Riverside Dr 35 39 32 27 - 36 75% 9 Tonikan Rd Ramona Ave to Thunderbird Rd Prima Facie 55 38 31 25 - 34 64% 10 Yucca Loma Rd Apple Valley Rd to Rincon Rd 45 51 46 42 - 51 81% 10A Rincon Rd to Kiowa Rd 45 53 48 43 - 52 72%
11 Nokomis Rd Symeron Rd to Riverside Dr 35 42 35 30 - 39 70% 12 Waalew Rd Corwin Rd to Dale Evans Pkwy Prima Facie 55 57 51 48 - 57 57% 13 Ottawa Rd Navajo Rd to Central Rd Prima Facie 55 45 38 32 - 41 61% Source: KOA Corporation, 2022
September 9, 2022 Page 12 of 22

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
September 9, 2022 Page 13 of 22

4.5. COLLISION HISTORY
Collisions which occurred on each of the street segments during the past three (3) years were reviewed to determine whether there was a higher than average incident of speed related collisions.

The available collision information was obtained from the California Statewide Integrated Traffic Records Systems (SWITRS) Report for the Town of Apple Valley. Collisions which occurred on these street segments during the three‐year period from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2021 were reviewed to determine whether there was a higher than average rate of collisions. Those segments where a higher than average collision rate is identified typically indicates a segment where conditions may exist that are not readily apparent to motorists. A review of collision data is provided for reference. All collision summary sheets are included in the Appendices.

The actual total collision rate (collisions per million vehicle miles) for the roadway segments were compared with the published statewide average rate in an urban environment as shown in the 2019 Collision Data on California State Highways.

Out of the sixteen (16) roadway segments studied, fourteen (14) street segments had a collision rate which was higher than the statewide average for similar roadways. The fourteen street segments are listed and highlighted in Table 2.

E&TS Collision Rate (Sample Calc)
“A” Avenue between “D” Drive and “S” Street
Approx. Length (Miles): 1.18
Total # of Midblock Collisions: 10
Average Daily Volume: 9672
Time (Years): 2
Formula for Collision Rate: # midblock Collisions x 106 Vol x Time (years) x 365 x Length (miles)
Collision Rate: 10 x 106
9672 x 2 x 365 x 1.18
Collision Rate = 1. 20 C/MVM
Rural, Mountainous, Urban
Roadway Classification: Secondary Arterial
Land Use: Commercial/Residential
Number of Lanes: 2-4
Prevailing Speed: <40 mph
Countywide Avg. Collision Rate: 1.32
Std. Deviation of Mean: 0.74
Significantly Higher Than Average?: No

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
September 9, 2022 Page 14 of 22
A summary of collisions are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2: Study Area Roadway Segments Collision Summary
Line
No. Street Segment
Number
of
Collisions
from
1/1/19 to
12/31/21
Severity Total Collision Rate
per MVM
Primary
Collision
Factor
Injury
Fatal
ADT
Actual Rate
2019 CA
Statewide
Average
Unsafe
Speed
Collisions
1 Apple Valley Rd
Yucca Loma Rd to Symeron
Rd 37 8 0 18281 0.77 1.08 17
1A Symeron Rd to Hwy 18 45 6 0 14177 2.90 1.08 18
2 Nanticoke Rd
Ramona Ave to Thunderbird
Rd 2 0 0 674 2.71 1.08 2
3 Powhatan Rd Navajo Rd to Central Rd 17 4 0 3749 4.14 1.08 1 4 Ramona Ave Navajo Rd to Central Rd 7 1 0 3085 2.07 1.08 1 5 Ramona Ave
Navajo Rd to Standing Rock
Ave 4 0 0 1539 3.16 1.08 0
5A Ramona Ave
Standing Rock Ave to
Thunderbird Rd 1 0 0 217 5.61 1.08 0
6 Rimrock Rd Corwin Rd to Hwy 18 7 1 0 319 20.04 1.08 2 7 Seneca Rd
Apple Valley Rd to Riverside
Dr 3 0 0 779 3.52 1.08 2
8 Symeron Rd
Apple Valley Rd to Riverside
Dr 2 0 0 898 2.03 1.08 0
9 Tonikan Rd
Ramona Ave to Thunderbird
Rd 1 0 0 246 3.71 1.08 0
10 Yucca Loma Rd Apple Valley Rd to Rincon Rd 29 6 1 10366 2.55 1.08 3 10A Rincon Rd to Kiowa Rd 7 3 0 7092 0.90 1.08 1
11 Nokomis Rd Symeron Rd to Riverside Dr 2 0 0 507 4.8 1.08 1 12 Waalew Rd Corwin Rd to Dale Evans Pkwy 8 0 0 2612 5.59 1.08 3 13 Ottawa Rd Navajo Rd to Central Rd 9 3 0 1506 5.46 1.08 0 Sources: 2019-2021 SWITRS and 2019 Collision Data on California State Highways NOTE: highlighted - fourteen street segments had a collision rate which was higher than the statewide average for similar roadways.

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
September 9, 2022 Page 15 of 22

4.6. CONDITIONS NOT READILY APPARENT TO MOTORISTS
Each street segment is reviewed through a field inspection to identify whether conditions not readily apparent to motorists exist. Aspects of the roadway environment such as adjacent land uses, horizontal and vertical sight distance, location and frequency of side streets or driveways, pedestrian and bicyclist behavior, general condition of the roadway surface and roadway geometry are considered. A determination is made whether those conditions are significant and warrant the recommendation of the speed limit be placed at five miles per hour below the basic speed limit. It is important to note that the State of California only provides a provision to reduce the recommended speed limit by a maximum of five miles per hour if significant conditions not readily apparent to motorists exist.

As previously discussed, speed limits are usually set at or near the critical speed, unless there are other factors not readily apparent to a reasonable motorist which may justify a lower limit. The field review of the selected street segments in the Town considered the following factors:

1. Street width and alignment (design speed).

2. Pedestrian activity and traffic flow characteristics.

3. Number of lanes and other channelization and striping patterns.

4. Frequency of intersections, driveways, and on‐street parking.

5. Location of stop signs and other regulatory traffic control devices.

6. Visibility obstructions.

7. Land use and proximity to schools.

8. Uniformity with existing speed zones and those in adjacent roadways.

9. Any other unusual condition not readily apparent to the driver.

Field information and observations relative to roadway conditions were made on March 28, 2022.

Vehicular 48-Hr ADT (Average Daily Traffic) Counts were conducted starting on May 03 thru May 18, 2022 and are summarized in Table 3. Radar speed survey measurements sheets were conducted at various dates using a certified radar gun between May 10, 2022 and May 19, 2022 are included in the Appendices.

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
Table 3: Traffic Count Summary
Line
No. Street Segment Speed Survey Location Direction ADT Volume NB/EB SB/WB Total
1 Apple Valley Rd Yucca Loma Rd to Symeron Rd 160 ft. north of Siesta Dr. NB/SB 8423 9858 18281 1A Symeron Rd to Hwy 18 750 ft. north of Mondamon Rd NB/SB 7024 7153 14177 2 Nanticoke Rd Ramona Ave to Thunderbird Rd 90 ft. north of Shandin Rd NB/SB 326 348 674 3 Powhatan Rd Navajo Rd to Central Rd 160 ft. west of Del Mar Rd EB/WB 1722 2028 3749 4 Ramona Ave Navajo Rd to Central Rd 470 ft. east of Pawnee Rd EB/WB 1742 1343 3085 5 Ramona Ave Navajo Rd to Standing Rock Ave 360 ft. north of Hopi Rd NB/SB 728 811 1539 5A Ramona Ave Standing Rock Ave to Thunderbird Rd 150 ft. south of Erie Rd NB/SB 112 105 217 6 Rimrock Rd Corwin Rd to Hwy 18 50 ft. north of St Timothy Rd NB/SB 124 196 319 7 Seneca Rd Apple Valley Rd to Riverside Dr. 450 ft. east of Mandan Rd EB/WB 404 375 779 8 Symeron Rd Apple Valley Rd to Riverside Dr. 160 ft. west of Tacony Rd EB/WB 479 419 898 9 Tonikan Rd Ramona Ave to Thunderbird Rd 20 ft. south of Gayhead Rd NB/SB 117 130 246 10 Yucca Loma Rd Apple Valley Rd to Rincon Rd 340 ft. east of Cronese Rd EB/WB 4929 5437 10366 10A Rincon Rd to Kiowa Rd 300 ft. west of Seminole Rd EB/WB 3390 3702 7092 11 Nokomis Rd Symeron Rd to Riverside Dr 310 ft. south of Tuscola Rd NB/SB 251 257 507 12 Waalew Rd Corwin Rd to Dale Evans Pkwy 45 ft. east of Rancho Del Lago Rd EB/WB 524 2089 2612 13 Ottawa Rd Navajo Rd to Central Rd 330 ft. west of Manhasset Rd EB/WB 725 781 1506 Source: KOA Corporation, 2022
ADT = Average Daily Traffic, NB = Northbound, SB = Southbound, WB = Westbound, EB, Eastbound September 9, 2022 Page 16 of 22

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
September 9, 2022 Page 17 of 22

5.0 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The speed limit recommendations are generally developed based on a review of the 85th percentile speed, roadway surface characteristics, land uses along the roadside, conditions not readily apparent to the driver, and reported crash history for a recent three‐year period. Table 4 shows a summary of recommended speed limits for each of the study roadway segments.

Table 4: Recommended Speed Limits
Line
No. Street Segment
Existing
Posted
Speed
Limit
(MPH)
85th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)
Recommended
Posted Speed
Limit (MPH)
Change
from
Existing
(MPH)
1 Apple Valley Rd Yucca Loma Rd to Symeron Rd 55 54 55 0 1A Symeron Rd to Hwy 18 55 51 50 -5
2 Nanticoke Rd Ramona Ave to Thunderbird Rd
Not
Posted 44 40 -15
3 Powhatan Rd Navajo Rd to Central Rd 45 42 40 -5
4 Ramona Ave Navajo Rd to Central Rd 45 48 45 0
5 Ramona Ave Navajo Rd to Standing Rock Ave 35 43 40 +5 5A Ramona Ave Standing Rock Ave to Thunderbird Rd 35 42 40 +5 6 Rimrock Rd Corwin Rd to Hwy 18 35 44 40 +5
7 Seneca Rd Apple Valley Rd to Riverside Dr. 35 45 45 +10 8 Symeron Rd Apple Valley Rd to Riverside Dr. 35 39 35 0 9 Tonikan Rd Ramona Ave to Thunderbird Rd
Not
Posted 38 40 -15
10 Yucca Loma RdApple Valley Rd to Rincon Rd 45 51 45 0 10A Rincon Rd to Kiowa Rd 45 53 45 0
11 Nokomis Rd Symeron Rd to Riverside Dr. 35 42 40 +5
12 Waalew Rd Corwin Rd to Dale Evans Pkwy
Not
Posted 57 Prima Facie 55 0
13 Ottawa Rd Navajo Rd to Central Rd
Not
Posted 45 40 -15
Source: KOA Corporation, 2022
Note: Streets that are Not-Posted are considered Prima Facie 55 MPH

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
September 9, 2022 Page 18 of 22

5.1. Apple Valley Rd between Yucca Loma Rd and Symeron Rd The observed 85th percentile speed is 54 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 45-54 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 50 MPH. If the speed limitwere based solely on the 85th percentile speed, the posted speed limit for this segment of Apple Valley Road would be established at 55 MPH. Based on review of study data, field observations, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Apple Valley Road remain at 55 MPH in both directions. Thisrepresents no change from the previous posted speed limit.

5.2. Apple Valley Rd between Symeron Rd and Highway 18
The observed 85th percentile speed is 51 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 40-49 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 47 MPH. If the speed limitwere based solely on the 85th percentile speed, the posted speed limit for this segment of Apple Valley Road would be established at 50 MPH. After review of study data, field observations, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriatespeedlimitforthissegmentofApple Valley Road be reduced to50 MPHinboth directions. Thisrepresents a reduction of 5 MPHfrom the previous posted speed limit.

5.3. Nanticoke Rd between Ramona Ave and Thunderbird Rd - (Not Posted) The observed 85th percentile speed is 44 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 35-44 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 38 MPH. If the speed limitwere based solely on the 85th percentile speed, the posted speed limit for this segment of Nanticoke Road would be established at 45 MPH. However, based on a review of study data, narrow roadway geometry, lack of sidewalks,field observations, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Nanticoke Road be established at 40 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.6. Thisrepresents a 15 MPH reduction from the not-posted Prima Facie speed of 55 MPH and is withinthe 10MPHPace Speed.

5.4. Powhatan Rd between Navajo Rd and Central Rd
The observed 85th percentile speed is 42 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 32‐41 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 37 MPH. Based on review of study data, field observations, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the speed limit for Powhatan Rd be established at40 MPH.Thisiswithin the 10 MPH Pace Speed, and represents a 5 MPH decrease from the previous posted speed limit.

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
September 9, 2022 Page 19 of 22

5.5. Ramona Ave between Navajo Rd and Central Rd
The observed 85th percentile speed is 48 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 39‐ 48 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 43 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, proximity to school (Rancho Verde Elementary) and marked School crosswalks, bike lanes with no on‐street parking, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Ramona Avenue remain at 45 MPH in both directions. Per new CVC Section 22358.8(a) is immediately applicable. If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, retain the current speed limit or restore the immediately prior speed limit if that speed limit was established with an engineering and traffic survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit.

This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed, and represents no change from the previous posted speed limit.

5.6. Ramona Ave between Navajo Rd and Standing Rock Ave The observed 85th percentile speed is 43 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 35‐ 44 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 38 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, no on‐street parking, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Ramona Avenue be set at 40 MPH in both directions per the new CVC Section 22358.6.This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and represents a 5 MPH increase from the previous posted speed limit and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

5.7. Ramona Ave between Standing Rock Ave and Thunderbird Rd The observed 85th percentile speed is 42 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 28‐ 37 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 35 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, no on‐street parking, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Ramona Avenue be set at 40 MPH in both directions. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and represents a 5 MPH increase from the previous posted speed limit and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
September 9, 2022 Page 20 of 22

5.8. Rimrock Rd between Corwin Rd and Highway 18
The observed 85th percentile speed is 44 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 35‐ 44 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 38 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, no on‐street parking, residential density, engineering judgment and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Rimrock Road be set at 40 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.6. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and represents an increase of 5 MPH from the previous posted speed limit and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

5.9. Seneca Rd between Apple Valley Rd and Riverside Dr.

The observed 85th percentile speed is 45 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 32‐ 41 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 38 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, no on‐street parking, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Seneca Road be set at 45 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.6. This is consistent with the 50th percentile speed at 38 MPH, as it cannot be posted below thatspeed, and represents an increase of 10 MPH from the previous posted speed limit and is close to the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

5.10. Symeron Rd between Apple Valley Rd and Riverside Dr.

The observed 85th percentile speed is 39 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 27‐ 36 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 32 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, frontage to school (Desert Knolls Elementary), marked School crosswalks, on‐street parking (fully improved section), residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Symeron Rd. be set at 35 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.6. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, with no change in the posted speed limit and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

5.11. Tonikan Rd between Ramona Ave and Thunderbird Rd. (Not Posted) The observed 85th percentile speed is 38 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 25‐ 34 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 31 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, no on‐street parking, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Tonikan Rd. be set at 40 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.6. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and represents a reduction in speed of 15 MPH from the unposted Prima Facie 55 MPH, and is close to the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
September 9, 2022 Page 21 of 22

5.12. Yucca Loma Rd between Apple Valley Rd and Rincon Rd.

The observed 85th percentile speed is 51 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 42‐ 51 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 46 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, no on‐street parking, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Yucca Loma Road remain at 45 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.8(a). If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, retain the current speed limit or restore the immediately prior speed limit if that speed limit was established with an engineering and traffic survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit.

This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed, and represents no change from the previous posted speed limit.

5.13. Yucca Loma Rd between Rincon Rd and Kiowa Rd.

The observed 85th percentile speed is 53 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 43‐ 52 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 48 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, on‐street parking at some locations, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Yucca Loma Road be set at 45 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.6. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed, and represents no change from the previous posted speed limit.

5.14. Nokomis Rd between Symeron Rd and Riverside Dr.

The observed 85th percentile speed is 42 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 30‐ 39 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 35 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, roadway width with no on‐street parking, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Nokomis Road remain at 40 MPH in both directions. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and is close to the 10 MPH Pace Speed, and represents no change from the previous posted speed limit.

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
September 9, 2022 Page 22 of 22

5.15. Waalew Rd between Corwin Rd and Dale Evans Pkwy. (Not Posted) The observed 85th percentile speed is 57 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 48‐ 57 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 51 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, roadway width with no on‐street parking, residential land use backing up to the road, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CAMUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Waalew Road be set at Prima Facie 55 MPH in both directions. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

5.16. Ottawa Rd between Navajo Rd and Central Rd
The observed 85th percentile speed is 45 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 32‐ 41 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 38 MPH. If the speed limit were based solely on the 85th percentile speed, the posted speed limit for this segment of Ottawa would be established at 45 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry, with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, roadway width with no on‐street parking, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Ottawa Road be set at 40 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.6. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, is a reduction of 15 MPH from the not posted Prima Facie 55 MPH, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

6.0 APPENDIX
A) Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary Sheets
B) Map of Existing and Recommended Speed Limits
C) Traffic Count Sheets
D) SWITRS 2019-2021 Collision Table
E) Radar Speed Summary Sheets
F) Radar Certifications
G) FHWA Roadway Classification Map
H) Caltrans District 8 - 2019 Crash Data

Appendix A
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary
Sheets

Town of Apple Valley, CA
Engineering Department

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street Name: Apple Valley Road Direction: N/S # of Lanes: 2 From: Yucca Loma Road Length: 2.4 Mile Width: 48 Feet
To: Symeron Road Bike Lanes: 2 Median: TWLTL
Roadway Classification*: Minor Arterial Posted Speed Limit: 55 MPH *California Road System Functional Classification Recommended Speed Limit: _55 MPH________ 85th Percentile: 54 MPH 10 MPH Pace: 45-54 MPH Percent Under Pace: 10% 50th Percentile: 50 MPH Percent In Pace: 79%
Date of Radar Speed Survey: 5/10/22 Percent Over Pace: 11% TRAFFIC COUNTS:

Location: 160 ft. North of Siesta Dr.

Average Daily Volume: 18,281 ADT Date of Counts: 5/3/22 - 5/4/22 ACCIDENT HISTORY:

Period 2019 Statewide Average Accident Rate**:

Actual Accident Rate:

1.08 To 2021 0.77
Type Head‐On Rear‐End Sideswipe Broadside Hit-Object Overturn Other/NS Vehicle w/ Ped‐Bike Total # 1 18 4 9 3 0 2 0
# Speed
Related 0 15 1 0 1 1 0 0
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

The roadway has one northbound lane and one southbound lane with a two way left turn lane. Unimproved, dirt shoulders, and no sidewalks on either side of the roadway. Bike lanes are provided for northbound and southbound directions. Bus stops, no parking on street. The adjacent land uses is residential. Long frontage single family homes with private driveways along both sides of the roadway.

OTHER FACTORS:

This roadway is straight and gradually inclined from south to north. Signalized intersections at Yucca Loma Rd., Shoshonee Rd., Seneca Rd., and Mandan Rd. The side street stop-controlled intersections are at Symeron Rd., Chamber Ln., Yaqui Rd., Kinai Rd., Keota Rd., Red Feather Rd., Haida Rd., and Siesta Dr. The segment is a truck route.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

Theobserved 85th percentile speed is 54 MPH. The10MPHPace Speedisbetween 45-54 MPH. The 50th percentile speedis50MPH. Ifthe speedlimitwerebasedsolelyonthe85th percentile speed,thepostedspeedlimitforthis segment ofApple Valley Roadwouldbeestablishedat55 MPH.Based on review ofstudydata,fieldobservations, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriatespeed limitforthissegmentofApple Valley Road remainat55MPHinbothdirections. Thisrepresents no change from the previous posted speed limit.

CERTIFICATION:

I, Ali Mateen Shahzad do hereby certify that all measurements, and calculations for this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the Town of Apple Valley, California were performed under my supervision, and are accurate and complete. I certify that this survey is consistent with the current methodology established in the 2014 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices Rev 6 2014, CVC 627 and AB 43. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Traffic Engineer.

Date RTE# 2295
** SOURCE: CALTRANS. 2019 Crash Data on CA State Highways (road miles, travel, crashes, crash rates). 1 9.9.22

Town of Apple Valley, CA
Engineering Department

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street Name: Apple Valley Road Direction: N/S # of Lanes: 2 From: Symeron Road Length: 1 Miles Width: 48 Feet
To: Highway 18 Bike Lanes: 2 Median: TWLTL
Roadway Classification*: Minor Arterial Posted Speed Limit: 55 MPH *California Road System Functional Classification Recommended Speed Limit: 50 MPH PREVAILING SPEEDS:
85th Percentile: 51 MPH 10 MPH Pace: 40-49 MPH Percent Under Pace: 2% 50th Percentile: 47 MPH Percent In Pace: 79%
Date of Speed Survey: 5/10/22 Percent Over Pace: 19%
TRAFFIC COUNTS:

Location: 750 ft. North of Mondamon Rd
Average Daily Volume: 14,177 ADT Date of Counts: 5/3/22 - 5/4/22 ACCIDENT HISTORY:

Period 2019 Statewide Average Accident Rate**:

Actual Accident Rate:

1.08 To 2021 2.90
Type Head‐On Rear‐End Sideswipe Broadside Hit Object Overturn Other/NS Vehicle w/ Ped‐Bike Total # 3 15 6 15 2 3 1 0
# Speed
Related 0 13 1 0 1 1 1 0
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

The roadway has one northbound lane and one southbound lane with a two way left turn lane. Sidewalks are provided on both sides of the roadway from Potomac Rd. to Hwy 18. No sidewalks are provided on either side of the roadway from Seneca Rd. to Potomac Rd. Bike lanes are provided for northbound and southbound directions. Sharrow bike shared road approaching Hwy 18. The adjacent land uses are residential with long frontages. Single family homes with private driveways along both sides of the roadway.

OTHER FACTORS:

This roadway is straight and gradually inclined downhill from Symeron Rd. to Quantico Rd. Horizontal and vertical curves occur from Quantico Rd. to Hwy 18. Signalized intersections at Mondamon Rd., Tuscola Rd., and Hwy 18.

Side street stop-controlled intersections at Symeron Rd., Quantico Rd., Kasota Rd., and Potomac Rd. The segment is a truck route.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

Theobserved 85th percentile speed is 51 MPH.The10MPHPace Speedisbetween 40-49 MPH. The 50th percentile speedis47MPH. Ifthe speedlimitwerebasedsolelyonthe85th percentile speed,thepostedspeedlimitforthis segment ofApple Valley Roadwouldbeestablishedat50 MPH.After review ofstudydata,fieldobservations, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limitforthissegmentofApple Valley Road be reduced toat50 MPHinbothdirections. Thisrepresents a reduction of 5 MPHfrom the previous posted speed limit.

CERTIFICATION:

I, Ali Mateen Shahzad do hereby certify that all measurements, and calculations for this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the Town of Apple Valley, California were performed under my supervision, and are accurate and complete. I certify that this survey is consistent with the current methodology established in the 2014 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices Rev 6 2014, CVC 627 and AB 43. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Traffic Engineer.

Date RTE# 2295
** SOURCE: CALTRANS. 2019 Crash Data on CA State Highways (road miles, travel, crashes, crash rates). 1A

9.9.22

Town of Apple Valley, CA
Engineering Department

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street Name: Nanticoke Road Direction: N/S # of Lanes: 2 From: Ramona Avenue Length: 1 Mile Width: 26 Feet
To: Thunderbird Road Bike Lanes: 0 Median: N/A
Roadway Classification: Local Posted Speed Limit: Not Posted *California Road System Functional Classification Recommended Speed Limit: 40 MPH PREVAILING SPEEDS:
85th Percentile: 44 MPH 10 MPH Pace: 35-44 MPH Percent Under Pace: 32% 50th Percentile: 38 MPH Percent In Pace: 57%
Date of Speed Survey: 5/18/22 Percent Over Pace: 11%
TRAFFIC COUNTS:

Location: 90 ft. North of Shandin Rd.

Average Daily Volume: 674 ADT Date of Counts: 5/17/22 – 5/18/22 ACCIDENT HISTORY:

Period 2019 Statewide Average Accident Rate**:

Actual Accident Rate:

1.08 To 2001 2.71
Type Head‐On Rear‐End Sideswipe Broadside Hit Object Overturn Other/NS Vehicle w/ Ped‐Bike Total # 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
# Speed
Related 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

The roadway is 26 feet wide with no striping. No sidewalks and bike lanes are provided along the roadway. One northbound lane and one southbound lane with 20 to 30 feet shoulder on each side. The adjacent land uses are residential. Single family homes with private driveways along both sides of the roadway.

OTHER FACTORS:

This roadway is flat. Side street stop controlled at all intersections along the roadway. Horizontal curves approaching Standing Rock Ave.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

Theobserved 85th percentile speed is 44MPH.The10MPHPace Speedisbetween 35-44MPH. The 50th percentile speedis38MPH. Ifthe speedlimitwerebasedsolelyonthe85th percentile speed,thepostedspeed limitforthissegment ofNanticoke Roadwouldbeestablishedat45MPH. However, based on a review of study data, narrow roadway geometry, lack of sidewalks, fieldobservations, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speedlimitforthissegmentof Nanticoke Road be established at40MPHin both directions per new CVC Section 22358.6. This represents a 15 MPH reduction from the not-posted Prima Facie speed of 55 MPH from the previous speed limit and iswithin the 10MPHPace Speed.

CERTIFICATION:

I, Ali Mateen Shahzad do hereby certify that all measurements, and calculations for this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the Town of Apple Valley, California were performed under my supervision, and are accurate and complete. I certify that this survey is consistent with the current methodology established in the 2014 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices Rev 6 2014, CVC 627 and AB 43. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Traffic Engineer.

Date RTE# 2295
** SOURCE: CALTRANS. 2019 Crash Data on CA State Highways (road miles, travel, crashes, crash rates). 2 9.9.22

Town of Apple Valley, CA
Engineering Department

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street Name: Powhatan Road Direction: W/E # of Lanes: 2 From: Navajo Road Length: 1 Mile Width: varies 38 to 40+ Feet To: Central Road Bike Lanes: 0 Median: N/A
Roadway Classification*: Local Posted Speed Limit: 45 MPH *California Road System Functional Classification Recommended Speed Limit: 40 MPH PREVAILING SPEEDS:
85th Percentile: 42 MPH 10 MPH Pace: 32-41 MPH Percent Under Pace: 7% 50th Percentile: 37 MPH Percent In Pace: 75%
Date of Speed Survey: 5/11/22 Percent Over Pace: 18%
TRAFFIC COUNTS:

Location: 160 ft. West of Del Mar Rd.

Average Daily Volume: 3,749 ADT Date of Counts: 5/17/22 – 5/18/22 ACCIDENT HISTORY:

Period 2019 Statewide Average Accident Rate**:

Actual Accident Rate:

1.08 To 2021 4.14
Type Head‐On Rear‐End Sideswipe Broadside Hit Object Overturn Other/NS Vehicle w/ Ped‐Bike Total # 7 2 1 6 1 0 0 0
# Speed
Related 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

The roadway has one eastbound lane and one westbound lane. The roadway has a combination of improvements on both sides with some areas having curbs, gutter, sidewalks, and some without improvements.

Some areas of the roadway are unimproved with dirt shoulders. Bike lanes are not provided. Parking is allowed.

A bus stop is located near the park. The adjacent land uses are residential apartments at 21905 Powhatan Rd. and self-storage at 13533 Powhatan Court. Bible Faith Center is also located nearby at 13538 Powhatan Ct. as well as James A. Woody Community Center, Apple Valley Skate Park, and the Animal Shelter. A mix of residential, industrial, and commercial land uses are present.

OTHER FACTORS:

This roadway is straight with no vertical or horizontal curves. A signalized intersection is at Navajo Rd. Side streets are stop controlled intersections are at Pawnee Rd., Powhatan Ct., Manhasset Rd., John Glenn Rd., Quinnault Rd., Nomwaket Rd., Hitt Rd., Malaki Rd., Tonikan Rd., and Central Rd. An uncontrolled intersection is at Del Mar Rd.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

Theobserved 85th percentile speed is 42 MPH. The10MPHPace Speedisbetween 32-41 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 37 MPH. Based on review of study data, field observations, engineering judgment, and guidelines in the Ca-MUTCD, it is recommended that the speedlimit beestablishedat40 MPH. Thisiswithin the 10MPHPace Speedandrepresents a 5 MPH decrease fromthe previous posted speed limit.

CERTIFICATION:

I, Ali Mateen Shahzad do hereby certify that all measurements, and calculations for this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the Town of Apple Valley, California were performed under my supervision, and are accurate and complete. I certify that this survey is consistent with the current methodology established in the 2014 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices Rev 6 2014, CVC 627 and AB 43. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Traffic Engineer.

Date RTE# 2295
** SOURCE: CALTRANS. 2019 Crash Data on CA State Highways (road miles, travel, crashes, crash rates). 3 9.9.22

Town of Apple Valley, CA
Engineering Department

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street Name: Ramona Avenue Direction: W/E # of Lanes: 2 From: Navajo Road Length: 1 Mile Width:36 Feet
To: Central Road Bike Lanes: 2 Median: N/A
Roadway Classification*: Major Collector Posted Speed Limit: 45 MPH *California Road System Functional Classification Recommended Speed Limit: 45 MPH PREVAILING SPEEDS:
85th Percentile: 48 MPH 10 MPH Pace: 39-48 MPH Percent Under Pace: 20% 50th Percentile: 43 MPH Percent In Pace: 69%
Date of Speed Survey: 8/31/22 Percent Over Pace: 11%
TRAFFIC COUNTS:

Location: 470 ft. East of Pawnee Rd
Average Daily Volume: 3,085 ADT Date of Counts: 8/30/22 – 8/31/22 ACCIDENT HISTORY:

Period 2019 Statewide Average Accident Rate**:

Actual Accident Rate:

1.08 To 2021 2.07
Type Head‐On Rear‐End Sideswipe Broadside Hit Object Overturn Other/NS Vehicle w/ Ped‐Bike Total # 1 1 1 2 1 0 0 1
# Speed
Related 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

The roadway has one eastbound lane and one westbound lane. Unimproved shoulders without sidewalks are provided on either side of the roadway. Bike lanes are provided for both directions. The adjacent land uses are residential single family homes with private driveways on both sides of the roadway.

OTHER FACTORS:

This roadway is flat and straight with no horizontal or vertical curves. An all-way stop controlled intersection is located at Navajo Rd. This segment contains numerous side street stop-controlled intersections. Rancho Verde Elementary School is on Pioneer Rd and south of this roadway. There are marked school crosswalks in 2 areas.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

The observed 85th percentile speed is 48 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 39‐ 48 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 43 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, proximity to school (Rancho Verde Elementary) and marked School crosswalks, bike lanes with no on‐street parking, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Ramona Avenue remain at 45 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.8(a). This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed, and represents no change from the previous posted speed limit.

CERTIFICATION:

I, Ali Mateen Shahzad do hereby certify that all measurements, and calculations for this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the Town of Apple Valley, California were performed under my supervision, and are accurate and complete. I certify that this survey is consistent with the current methodology established in the 2014 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices Rev 6 2014, CVC 627 and AB 43. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Traffic Engineer.

Date RTE# 2295
** SOURCE: CALTRANS. 2019 Crash Data on CA State Highways (road miles, travel, crashes, crash rates). 4 9.9.22

Town of Apple Valley, CA
Engineering Department

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street Name: Ramona Avenue Direction: N/S # of Lanes: 2 From: Navajo Road Length: 0.75 Mile Width: 24 Feet
To: Standing Rock Avenue Bike Lanes: 0 Median: N/A
Roadway Classification*: Major Collector Posted Speed Limit: 35 MPH *California Road System Functional Classification Recommended Speed Limit: 40 MPH PREVAILING SPEEDS:
85th Percentile: 43 MPH 10 MPH Pace: 35-44 MPH Percent Under Pace: 19% 50th Percentile: 38 MPH Percent In Pace: 68%
Date of Speed Survey: 5/18/22 Percent Over Pace: 13%
TRAFFIC COUNTS:

Location: 360 ft. North of Hopi Rd
Average Daily Volume: 1,539 ADT Date of Counts: 5/10/22 – 5/11/22 ACCIDENT HISTORY:

Period 2019 Statewide Average Accident Rate**:

Actual Accident Rate:

1.08 To 2021 3.16
Type Head‐On Rear‐End Sideswipe Broadside Hit Object Overturn Other/NS Vehicle w/ Ped‐Bike Total # 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0
# Speed
Related 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

The roadway is 24 feet wide without striping or bike lanes. Shoulders are unimproved without sidewalks. The roadway is improved with one northbound lane and one southbound lane with a 10 to 13 feet shoulder. The adjacent land uses are residential single family homes with private driveways on both sides of the roadway.

OTHER FACTORS:

This roadway is flat with horizontal curves approaching both ends of the segment. There is an all-way stop controlled intersection at Navajo Rd. and side street stop-controlled intersections are located at Jicarilla Rd., Iroquois Rd., Hopi Rd., Gayhead Rd., Flathead Rd., Erie Rd., and Standing Rock Ave. 35 MPH Advisory signs are posted for the horizontal curve at Jicarilla Rd. northbound, and at Iroquois Rd. southbound.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

The observed 85th percentile speed is 43 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 35‐ 44 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 38 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, no on‐street parking, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Ramona Avenue be set at 40 MPH in both directions per the new CVC Section 22358.6.This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and represents a 5 MPH increase from the previous posted speed limit and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

CERTIFICATION:

I, Ali Mateen Shahzad do hereby certify that all measurements, and calculations for this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the Town of Apple Valley, California were performed under my supervision, and are accurate and complete. I certify that this survey is consistent with the current methodology established in the 2014 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices Rev 6 2014, CVC 627 and AB 43. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Traffic Engineer.

Date RTE# 2295
** SOURCE: CALTRANS. 2019 Crash Data on CA State Highways (road miles, travel, crashes, crash rates). 5 9.9.22

Town of Apple Valley, CA
Engineering Department

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street Name: Ramona Avenue Direction: N/S # of Lanes: 2 From: Standing Rock Avenue Length: 0.75 Mile Width: 24 Feet To: Thunderbird Road Bike Lanes: 0 Median: N/A
Roadway Classification*: Major Collector Posted Speed Limit: 35 MPH *California Road System Functional Classification Recommended Speed Limit: 40 MPH PREVAILING SPEEDS:
85th Percentile: 42 MPH 10 MPH Pace: 28-37 MPH Percent Under Pace: 8% 50th Percentile: 35 MPH Percent In Pace: 64%
Date of Speed Survey: 5/19/22 Percent Over Pace: 28%
TRAFFIC COUNTS:

Location: 150 ft. South of Erie Rd
Average Daily Volume: 217 ADT Date of Counts: 5/10/22 – 5/11/22 ACCIDENT HISTORY:

Period 2019 Statewide Average Accident Rate**:

Actual Accident Rate:

1.05 To 2021 5.61
Type Head‐On Rear‐End Sideswipe Broadside Hit Object Overturn Other/NS Vehicle w/ Ped‐Bike Total # 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
# Speed
Related 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

The roadway is narrow with no striping. No sidewalks, bike lanes or any striping are present along the roadway.

There is one northbound lane and one southbound lane with a 10 to 13 feet dirt shoulder on each side. The adjacent land uses are residential. Single family homes with many private driveways line both sides of the roadway.

OTHER FACTORS:

This roadway is flat. There are side street stop controlled intersections at Standing Rock Ave., Erie Rd., and Thunderbird Rd. There is a slight horizontal curve at Flathead Rd. northbound and at Erie Rd. southbound.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

The observed 85th percentile speed is 42 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 28‐ 37 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 35 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, no on‐street parking, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Ramona Road be set at 40 MPH in both directions. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and represents a 5 MPH increase from the previous posted speed limit and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

CERTIFICATION:

I, Ali Mateen Shahzad do hereby certify that all measurements, and calculations for this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the Town of Apple Valley, California were performed under my supervision, and are accurate and complete. I certify that this survey is consistent with the current methodology established in the 2014 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices Rev 6 2014, CVC 627 and AB 43. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Traffic Engineer.

Date RTE# 2295
** SOURCE: CALTRANS. 2019 Crash Data on CA State Highways (road miles, travel, crashes, crash rates). 5A

9.9.22

Town of Apple Valley, CA
Engineering Department

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street Name: Rimrock Road Direction: N/S # of Lanes: 2
From: Highway 18 Length: 1 Mile Width: 24 Feet
To: Corwin Road Bike Lanes: 0 Median: N/A
Roadway Classification*: Major Collector Posted Speed Limit: 35 MPH *California Road System Functional Classification Recommended Speed Limit: 40 MPH PREVAILING SPEEDS:
85th Percentile: 44 MPH 10 MPH Pace: 35-44 MPH Percent Under Pace: 17% 50th Percentile: 38 MPH Percent In Pace: 68%
Date of Speed Survey: 5/18/22 Percent Over Pace: 15%
TRAFFIC COUNTS:

Location: 50 ft. North of St. Timothy Rd
Average Daily Volume: 319 ADT Date of Counts: 5/17/22 – 5/18/22 ACCIDENT HISTORY:

Period 2019 Statewide Average Accident Rate**:

Actual Accident Rate:

1.08 To 2021 20.04
Type Head‐On Rear‐End Sideswipe Broadside Hit Object Overturn Other/NS Vehicle w/ Ped‐Bike Total # 0 0 2 2 2 0 1 0
# Speed
Related 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

The roadway is 24 feet wide with edge line and double yellow striping up to Allegheny Rd. then no striping to Corwin Rd. Shoulders are unimproved without sidewalks or bike lanes. There is one northbound lane and one southbound lane with a 10 to 15 feet shoulder on each side. The adjacent land uses are residential single family homes with private driveways on both sides of the roadway.

OTHER FACTORS:

This roadway has a downgrade from north to south. All side street intersections are stop controlled. Rimrock Rd. has five (5) horizontal curves along this segment.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

The observed 85th percentile speed is 44 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 35‐ 44 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 38 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, no on‐street parking, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Rimrock Road North be set at 40 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.6. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and represents an increase of 5 MPH from the previous posted speed limit and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

CERTIFICATION:

I, Ali Mateen Shahzad do hereby certify that all measurements, and calculations for this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the Town of Apple Valley, California were performed under my supervision, and are accurate and complete. I certify that this survey is consistent with the current methodology established in the 2014 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices Rev 6 2014, CVC 627 and AB 43. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Traffic Engineer.

Date RTE# 2295
** SOURCE: CALTRANS. 2019 Crash Data on CA State Highways (road miles, travel, crashes, crash rates). 6 9.9.22

Town of Apple Valley, CA
Engineering Department

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street Name: Seneca Road Direction: W/E # of Lanes: 2
From: Apple Valley Road Length: 1 Mile Width: 35 Feet
To: Riverside Drive Bike Lanes: 0 Median: N/A
Roadway Classification*: Major Collector Posted Speed Limit: 35 MPH *California Road System Functional Classification Recommended Speed Limit: 45 MPH PREVAILING SPEEDS:
85th Percentile: 45 MPH 10 MPH Pace: 32-41 MPH Percent Under Pace: 11% 50th Percentile: 38 MPH Percent In Pace: 61%
Date of Speed Survey: 5/11/22 Percent Over Pace: 28%
TRAFFIC COUNTS:

Location: 450 ft. East of Mandan Rd
Average Daily Volume: 779 ADT Date of Counts: 5/3/22 - 5/4/22 ACCIDENT HISTORY:

Period 2019 Statewide Average Accident Rate**:

Actual Accident Rate:

1.08 To 2021 3.52
Type Head‐On Rear‐End Sideswipe Broadside Hit Object Overturn Other/NS Vehicle w/ Ped‐Bike Total # 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0
# Speed
Related 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

The roadway is not striped. Concrete curb, gutter, and sidewalk are in place in front of “Church For Whosoever”.

The remainder of the roadway does not have sidewalks. AC curb has been provided in some areas. No bike lanes have been provided along the roadway. There is one eastbound lane and one westbound lane. Single family homes with private driveways line both sides of the roadway. Wide dirt shoulders have been provided.

OTHER FACTORS:

This roadway is straight, with a slight downgrade westbound. There is a signalized intersection at Apple Valley Rd. and side street stop-controlled intersections are located at Riverside Dr., Seneca Ct., Inkpa Rd., Mandan Rd., and Havasu Rd. There is a slight horizontal curve approaching Riverside Dr.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

The observed 85th percentile speed is 45 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 32‐ 41 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 38 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, no on‐street parking, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Seneca Road be set at 45 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.6. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, an increase of 10 MPH from the previous posted speed and is close to the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

CERTIFICATION:

I, Ali Mateen Shahzad do hereby certify that all measurements, and calculations for this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the Town of Apple Valley, California were performed under my supervision, and are accurate and complete. I certify that this survey is consistent with the current methodology established in the 2014 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices Rev 6 2014, CVC 627 and AB 43. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Traffic Engineer.

Date RTE# 2295
** SOURCE: CALTRANS. 2019 Crash Data on CA State Highways (road miles, travel, crashes, crash rates). 7 9.9.22

Town of Apple Valley, CA
Engineering Department

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street Name: Symeron Road Direction: W/E # of Lanes: 2
From: Apple Valley Road Length: 1 Mile Width:24 to 36 Feet To: Riverside Drive Bike Lanes: 0 Median: N/A
Roadway Classification*: Major Collector Posted Speed Limit: 35 MPH *California Road System Functional Classification Recommended Speed Limit: 35 MPH PREVAILING SPEEDS:
85th Percentile: 39 MPH 10 MPH Pace: 27-36 MPH Percent Under Pace: 5% 50th Percentile: 32 MPH Percent In Pace: 75%
Date of Speed Survey: 5/10/22 Percent Over Pace: 20%
TRAFFIC COUNTS:

Location: 160 ft. West of Tacony Rd
Average Daily Volume: 898 ADT Date of Counts: 5/3/22 – 5/4/22 ACCIDENT HISTORY:

Period 2019 Statewide Average Accident Rate**:

Actual Accident Rate:

1.08 To 2021 2.03
Type Head‐On Rear‐End Sideswipe Broadside Hit Object Overturn Other/NS Vehicle w/ Ped‐Bike Total # 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
# Speed
Related 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

Curb, gutter, and sidewalks are provided on both sides of the roadway from Tuscola Rd to Apple Valley Rd. The segment from Riverside Dr. to Tuscola Rd. is 24 feet wide with unimproved shoulders. There is one eastbound lane and one westbound lane. No bike lanes are present. Adjoining property is residential single family homes with private driveways except at the school. Desert Knolls Elementary School Zone is east of Tuscola Rd. There is an all-way stop with school crosswalks at Symeron Rd. and Tuscola Rd. and a school speed zone.

OTHER FACTORS:

This roadway is generally straight and flat. Side streets are stop controlled at all intersections. There is centerline striping present. There is a slight horizontal curve on Symeron Rd. approaching Riverside Dr. There is also a slight horizontal curve approaching Apple Valley Rd.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

The observed 85th percentile speed is 39 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 27‐ 36 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 32 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, frontage to a school (Desert Knolls Elementary) and marked School crosswalks, on‐street parking (fully improved section), residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Symeron Rd. be set at 35 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.6. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, with no change in the posted speed limit and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

CERTIFICATION:

I, Ali Mateen Shahzad do hereby certify that all measurements, and calculations for this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the Town of Apple Valley, California were performed under my supervision, and are accurate and complete. I certify that this survey is consistent with the current methodology established in the 2014 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices Rev 6 2014, CVC 627 and AB 43. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Traffic Engineer.

Date RTE# 2295
** SOURCE: CALTRANS. 2019 Crash Data on CA State Highways (road miles, travel, crashes, crash rates). 8 9.9.22

Town of Apple Valley, CA
Engineering Department

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street Name: Tonikan Road Direction: N/S # of Lanes: 2
From: Ramona Road Length: 1 Mile Width: 24 Feet
To: Thunderbird Road Bike Lanes: 0 Median: N/A
Roadway Classification*: Local Posted Speed Limit: Not Posted *California Road System Functional Classification Recommended Speed Limit: 40 MPH PREVAILING SPEEDS:
85th Percentile: 38 MPH 10 MPH Pace: 25-34 MPH Percent Under Pace: 6% 50th Percentile: 31 MPH Percent In Pace: 64%
Date of Speed Survey: 5/19/22 Percent Over Pace: 30%
TRAFFIC COUNTS:

Location: 20 ft. South of Gayhead Rd.

Average Daily Volume: 246 ADT Date of Counts: 5/10/22 – 5/11/22 ACCIDENT HISTORY:

Period 2019 Statewide Average Accident Rate**:

Actual Accident Rate:

1.08 To 2021 3.71
Type Head‐On Rear‐End Sideswipe Broadside Hit Object Overturn Other/NS Vehicle w/ Ped‐Bike Total # 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
# Speed
Related 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

The roadway is 24 feet wide with no striping. No sidewalks and bike lanes are provided along the roadway. There is one northbound lane and one southbound lane with a 20 to 30 feet dirt shoulder on each side. Single family homes with private driveways line both sides of the roadway.

OTHER FACTORS:

This roadway is flat. Side streets are stop controlled at all intersections along the roadway. Tonikan Rd. is stop controlled at Standing Rock Ave. There are slight horizontal curves along the roadway.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

The observed 85th percentile speed is 38 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 25‐ 34 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 31 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, no on‐street parking, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Tonikan Rd. be set at 40 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.6. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, a represents a reduction in speed of 15 MPH from the unposted Prima Facie 55 MPH and is close to the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

CERTIFICATION:

I, Ali Mateen Shahzad do hereby certify that all measurements, and calculations for this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the Town of Apple Valley, California were performed under my supervision, and are accurate and complete. I certify that this survey is consistent with the current methodology established in the 2014 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices Rev 6 2014, CVC 627 and AB 43. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Traffic Engineer.

Date RTE# 2295
** SOURCE: CALTRANS. 2019 Crash Data on CA State Highways (road miles, travel, crashes, crash rates). 9 9.9.22

Town of Apple Valley, CA
Engineering Department

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street Name: Yucca Loma Road Direction: W/E # of Lanes: 2 From: Apple Valley Road Length: 1 Mile Width: 24 to 36 Feet To: Rincon Road Bike Lanes: 0 Median: N/A
Roadway Classification*: Minor Arterial Posted Speed Limit: 45 MPH *California Road System Functional Classification Recommended Speed Limit: 45 MPH PREVAILING SPEEDS:
85th Percentile: 51 MPH 10 MPH Pace: 42-51 MPH Percent Under Pace: 9% 50th Percentile: 46 MPH Percent In Pace: 81%
Date of Speed Survey: 5/10/22 Percent Over Pace: 10%
TRAFFIC COUNTS:

Location: 340 ft. East of Cronese Rd
Average Daily Volume: 10,366 ADT Date of Counts: 5/3/22 – 5/4/22 ACCIDENT HISTORY:

Period 2019 Statewide Average Accident Rate**:

Actual Accident Rate:

1.08 To 2021 2.55
Type Head‐On Rear‐End Sideswipe Broadside Hit Object Overturn Other/NS Vehicle w/ Ped‐Bike Total # 3 1 3 15 6 0 1 0
# Speed
Related 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

An asphalt sidewalk is in place on the south side of the roadway. A.C. and partial concrete curb & gutter are provided on both sides of the roadway from Apple Valley Rd. to Cronese Rd., with dirt shoulders from Cronese Rd. to Rincon Rd. No bike lanes are provided in either direction. Edge line and centerline striping are in place.

There is one eastbound lane and one westbound lane. Single family homes with private driveways line both sides of the roadway.

OTHER FACTORS:

This roadway alignment is generally straight with vertical grades up to 5% between Apple Valley Road and Cronese Rd. There is a signalized intersection at Apple Valley Rd. There is an all way stop controlled intersection at Rincon Rd. There are side street stop-controlled intersections at Chateau Ct., Choco Rd., Delaware Rd., and Cronese Rd.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

The observed 85th percentile speed is 51 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 42‐ 51 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 46 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop-controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, no on‐street parking, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Yucca Loma Road remain at 45 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.8(a). This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed, and represents no change from the previous posted speed limit.

CERTIFICATION:

I, Ali Mateen Shahzad do hereby certify that all measurements, and calculations for this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the Town of Apple Valley, California were performed under my supervision, and are accurate and complete. I certify that this survey is consistent with the current methodology established in the 2014 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices Rev 6 2014, CVC 627 and AB 43. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Traffic Engineer.

Date RTE# 2295
** SOURCE: CALTRANS. 2019 Crash Data on CA State Highways (road miles, travel, crashes, crash rates). 10 9.9.22

Town of Apple Valley, CA
Engineering Department

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street Name: Yucca Loma Road Direction: W/E # of Lanes: 2 From: Rincon Road Length: 1 Mile Width: 36 -70Feet
To: Kiowa Road Bike Lanes: 0 Median: N/A
Roadway Classification*: Minor Arterial Posted Speed Limit: 45 MPH *California Road System Functional Classification Recommended Speed Limit: 45 MPH PREVAILING SPEEDS:
85th Percentile: 53 MPH 10 MPH Pace: 43-52 MPH Percent Under Pace: 10% 50th Percentile: 48 MPH Percent In Pace: 72%
Date of Speed Survey: 5/10/22 Percent Over Pace: 18%
TRAFFIC COUNTS:

Location: 300 ft. West of Seminole Rd
Average Daily Volume: 7,092 ADT Date of Counts: 5/10/22 – 5/11/22 ACCIDENT HISTORY:

Period 2019 Statewide Average Accident Rate**:

Actual Accident Rate:

1.08 To 2021 0.90
Type Head‐On Rear‐End Sideswipe Broadside Hit Object Overturn Other/NS Vehicle w/ Ped‐Bike Total # 0 1 0 5 1 0 0 0
# Speed
Related 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

An asphalt sidewalk is in place on the south side of the roadway. There are 5 to 20 feet dirt shoulders on both sides of the roadway. No bike lanes are provided in either direction. Edge lines have been provided on both sides and there is double yellow centerline striping at intersections and skip striping along the roadway. There is one eastbound lane and one westbound lane. Single family homes with private driveways line both sides of the road.

OTHER FACTORS:

This roadway alignment is generally straight and flat with a slight vertical grade increase west to east. All way stop controlled intersections are present at Rincon Road and Kiowa Road. Side street stop-controlled intersections are present at Cree Rd., Quapaw Rd., Seminole Rd., Hopi Rd., Iroquois Rd., and Jicarilla Rd. There is an asphalt bike route on the south side of the roadway.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

The observed 85th percentile speed is 53 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 43‐ 52 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 48 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop-controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, on‐street parking at some locations, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Yucca Loma Road be set at 45 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.8 (a). This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed, and represents no change from the previous posted speed limit.

CERTIFICATION:

I, Ali Mateen Shahzad do hereby certify that all measurements, and calculations for this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the Town of Apple Valley, California were performed under my supervision, and are accurate and complete. I certify that this survey is consistent with the current methodology established in the 2014 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices Rev 6 2014, CVC 627 and AB 43. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Traffic Engineer.

Date RTE# 2295
** SOURCE: CALTRANS. 2019 Crash Data on CA State Highways (road miles, travel, crashes, crash rates). 10A

9.9.22

Town of Apple Valley, CA
Engineering Department

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street Name: Nokomis Road Direction: N/S # of Lanes: 2
From: Symeron Road Length: 0.75 Mile Width: 22 – 24 Feet To: Riverside Drive Bike Lanes: 0 Median: N/A
Roadway Classification*: Local Posted Speed Limit: 35 MPH *California Road System Functional Classification Recommended Speed Limit: 40 MPH PREVAILING SPEEDS:
85th Percentile: 42 MPH 10 MPH Pace: 30-39 MPH Percent Under Pace: 13% 50th Percentile: 35 MPH Percent In Pace: 70%
Date of Speed Survey: 5/13/22 Percent Over Pace: 17%
TRAFFIC COUNTS:

Location: 310 ft. South of Tuscola Rd
Average Daily Volume: 507 ADT Date of Counts: 5/3/22 – 5/4/22 ACCIDENT HISTORY:

Period 2019 Statewide Average Accident Rate**:

Actual Accident Rate:

1.08 To 2021 4.8
Type Head‐On Rear‐End Sideswipe Broadside Hit Object Overturn Other/NS Vehicle w/ Ped‐Bike Total # 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0
# Speed
Related 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

The roadway is 22 to 24 feet wide with no striping. No sidewalks and bike lanes are provided along the roadway.

There is one northbound lane and one southbound lane with a 10 to 20 feet shoulder on each side. Single family homes with private driveways line both sides of the roadway.

OTHER FACTORS:

This roadway is generally flat. There are side street stop controls at all intersections. There is a slight horizontal curve at Winnetka Rd. and another approaching Riverside Dr. There is a reverse curve on the north end approaching Symeron Road with curve warning signs and advisory speed plaques.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

The observed 85th percentile speed is 42 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 30‐ 39 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 35 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, roadway width with no on‐street parking, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Nokomis Road be set at 40 MPH in both directions. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and is close to the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

CERTIFICATION:

I, Ali Mateen Shahzad do hereby certify that all measurements, and calculations for this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the Town of Apple Valley, California were performed under my supervision, and are accurate and complete. I certify that this survey is consistent with the current methodology established in the 2014 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices Rev 6 2014, CVC 627 and AB 43. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Traffic Engineer.

Date RTE# 2295
** SOURCE: CALTRANS. 2019 Crash Data on CA State Highways (road miles, travel, crashes, crash rates). 11 9.9.22

Town of Apple Valley, CA
Engineering Department

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street Name: Waalew Road Direction: W/E # of Lanes: 2
From: Corwin Road Length: 0.5 Mile Width: 36 Feet
To: Dale Evans Parkway Bike Lanes: 2 Median: N/A
Roadway Classification*: Minor Arterial Posted Speed Limit: Not Posted *California Road System Functional Classification Recommended Speed Limit: 55 Prima Facie PREVAILING SPEEDS:
85th Percentile: 57 MPH 10 MPH Pace: 48-57 MPH Percent Under Pace: 30% 50th Percentile: 51 MPH Percent In Pace: 57%
Date of Speed Survey: 5/19/22 Percent Over Pace: 13%
TRAFFIC COUNTS:

Location: 45 ft. East of Rancho Del Lago Dr.

Average Daily Volume: 2,612 ADT Date of Counts: 5/17/22 – 5/18/22 ACCIDENT HISTORY:

Period 2019 Statewide Average Accident Rate**:

Actual Accident Rate:

1.08 To 2021 5.59
Type Head‐On Rear‐End Sideswipe Broadside Hit Object Overturn Other/NS Vehicle w/ Ped‐Bike Total # 1 2 3 2 0 0 0 0
# Speed
Related 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

No curb, gutter, or sidewalks are provided along the roadway. Bike lanes are provided for both directions with Pass 3 Ft. Min. signage. There is one northbound lane and one southbound lane separated by double yellow centerline striping. Single family homes backing up to Waalew Rd. The road has a wide dirt shoulder on south side, and a dirt shoulder on north side. Bus stops are present along the road.

OTHER FACTORS:

There is side street stop control at all intersections. There is a horizontal curve approaching Corwin Road. The curve is signed and has an advisory speed plaque. The segment is otherwise straight and flat with an incline east to west.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

The observed 85th percentile speed is 57 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 48‐ 57 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 51 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, roadway width with no on‐street parking, residential land use backing up to the road, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Waalew Road be set at Prima Facie 55 MPH in both directions. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

CERTIFICATION:

I, Ali Mateen Shahzad do hereby certify that all measurements, and calculations for this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the Town of Apple Valley, California were performed under my supervision, and are accurate and complete. I certify that this survey is consistent with the current methodology established in the 2014 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices Rev 6 2014, CVC 627 and AB 43. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Traffic Engineer.

Date RTE# 2295
** SOURCE: CALTRANS. 2019 Crash Data on CA State Highways (road miles, travel, crashes, crash rates). 12 9.9.22

Town of Apple Valley, CA
Engineering Department

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Street Name: Ottawa Road Direction: W/E # of Lanes: 2
From: Navajo Road Length: 1 Mile Width: varies 24 to 40 Feet To: Central Road Bike Lanes: 0 Median: N/A
Roadway Classification*: Major Collector Posted Speed Limit: Not posted *California Road System Functional Classification Recommended Speed Limit: 40 MPH PREVAILING SPEEDS:
85th Percentile: 45 MPH 10 MPH Pace: 32-41 MPH Percent Under Pace: 11% 50th Percentile: 38 MPH Percent In Pace: 61%
Date of Speed Survey: 5/13/22 Percent Over Pace: 28%
TRAFFIC COUNTS:

Location: 330 ft. West of Manhasset Rd
Average Daily Volume: 1,506 ADT Date of Counts: 5/17/22 – 5/18/22 ACCIDENT HISTORY:

Period 2019 Statewide Average Accident Rate**:

Actual Accident Rate:

1.08 To 2021 5.46
Type Head‐On Rear‐End Sideswipe Broadside Hit Object Overturn Other/NS Vehicle w/ Ped‐Bike Total # 0 0 0 8 1 0 0 0
# Speed
Related 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

Curb, gutter, and sidewalks are provided in front of Rube Bending Technology and Alba Foster Care, and the rest of the roadway has 5 to 15 feet shoulder. No striping or bike lanes are provided in either direction. There is one eastbound lane and one westbound lane. Private residential driveways line both sides of the roadway. The land use is residential on the west end and commercial on the east end. The shoulders are unimproved.

OTHER FACTORS:

The roadway is generally straight and flat. The width varies and the side streets are stop controlled at all intersections. The First Assembly of God is located on the south side, and the Ascension Lutheran Church on the north side of the street. A baseball park is located on the north side between Osage Court and Manhasset Road.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

The observed 85th percentile speed is 45 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 32‐ 41 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 38 MPH. If the speed limit were based solely on the 85th percentile speed, the posted speed limit for this segment of Ottawa Road would be established at 45 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry, stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, roadway width with no on‐street parking, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CAMUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Ottawa Road be set at 40 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.6. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and a reduction of 15 MPH from the not posted Prima Facie 55 MPH and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

CERTIFICATION:

I, Ali Mateen Shahzad do hereby certify that all measurements, and calculations for this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the Town of Apple Valley, California were performed under my supervision, and are accurate and complete. I certify that this survey is consistent with the current methodology established in the 2014 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices Rev 6 2014, CVC 627 and AB 43. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Traffic Engineer.

Date RTE# 2295
** SOURCE: CALTRANS. 2019 Crash Data on CA State Highways (road miles, travel, crashes, crash rates). 13 9.9.22

Appendix B
Map of Existing and Recommended
Speed Limits

Appendix C
Traffic Count Sheets

Survey Count Job2022-0271-1 Contact: (949) 543 5756
For TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY
Location Apple Valley Rd between Yucca Loma Rd & Hwy 18 Task Speed and ADT
Study Name 1A‐AppleValley0501
Study ID 8421413825
Device Serial Number D0:04:AD:76:42:1B
Location (Google Maps link) http://maps.google.com/maps?z=12&t=m&q=loc:34.533723411182535,‐117.26570597860709 ******** ********
Daily Summary
5/3/2022 5/4/2022
EastBound Volume 6949 7098
WestBound Volume 7129 7177
Total Volume 14078 14275
EastBound Average Speed 41 41
WestBound Average Speed 47 49
Total Average Speed 44 45
EastBound 85th Percentile Speed 50 49
WestBound 85th Percentile Speed 55 57
Total 85th Percentile Speed 53 54
EastBound AM Peak Hour 11:00‐11:59 11:00‐11:59
WestBound AM Peak Hour 07:00‐07:59 07:00‐07:59
Total AM Peak Hour 07:00‐07:59 07:00‐07:59
EastBound AM Peak Hourly Volume 399 424
WestBound AM Peak Hourly Volume 577 611
Total AM Peak Hourly Volume 976 1035
EastBound PM Peak Hour 16:00‐16:59 16:00‐16:59
WestBound PM Peak Hour 14:00‐14:59 13:00‐13:59
Total PM Peak Hour 16:00‐16:59 16:00‐16:59
EastBound PM Peak Hourly Volume 716 732
WestBound PM Peak Hourly Volume 479 551
Total PM Peak Hourly Volume 1195 1283

Survey Count Job2022-0271-1 Contact: (949) 543 5756
For TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY
Location Apple Valley Rd between Yucca Loma Rd & Hwy 18 Task Speed and ADT
Study Name 1‐AppleValley0502
Study ID 9063789651
Device Serial Number DD:81:9D:DE:76:DD
Location (Google Maps l http://maps.google.com/maps?z=12&t=m&q=loc:34.504396573621186,‐117.24253262457097 Time Zone America/Los_Angeles ‐ Pacific Daylight Time
******** ********
Daily Summary
5/3/2022 5/4/2022
NorthBound Volume 8496 8351
SouthBound Volume 9868 9847
Total Volume 18364 18198
NorthBound Average Speed 47 46
SouthBound Average Speed 45 45
Total Average Speed 46 45
NorthBound 85th Percentile Speed 57 56
SouthBound 85th Percentile Speed 52 52
Total 85th Percentile Speed 54 54
NorthBound AM Peak Hour 08:00‐08:59 08:00‐08:59
SouthBound AM Peak Hour 08:00‐08:59 08:00‐08:59
Total AM Peak Hour 08:00‐08:59 08:00‐08:59
NorthBound AM Peak Hourly Volume 576 603
SouthBound AM Peak Hourly Volume 696 668
Total AM Peak Hourly Volume 1272 1271
NorthBound PM Peak Hour 15:00‐15:59 13:00‐13:59
SouthBound PM Peak Hour 16:00‐16:59 16:00‐16:59
Total PM Peak Hour 16:00‐16:59 16:00‐16:59
NorthBound PM Peak Hourly Volume 646 589
SouthBound PM Peak Hourly Volume 917 894
Total PM Peak Hourly Volume 1563 1483

Survey Count Job2022-0271-1 Contact: (949) 543 5756
For TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY
Location Nanticoke Rd Between Ramona Ave and Thunderbird Rd Task Speed and ADT
Study Name 2RevAppleValkey0515
Study ID 6130338170
Device Serial Number DD:81:9D:DE:76:DD
Location (Google Maps link) http://maps.google.com/maps?z=12&t=m&q=loc:34.52377744487908,‐117.18172861274068 Time Zone America/Los_Angeles ‐ Pacific Daylight Time
******** ********
Daily Summary
5/17/2022 5/18/2022
NorthBound Volume 344 307
SouthBound Volume 332 364
Total Volume 676 671
NorthBound Average Speed 37 36
SouthBound Average Speed 36 37
Total Average Speed 36 37
NorthBound 85th Percentile Speed 43 43
SouthBound 85th Percentile Speed 44 44
Total 85th Percentile Speed 44 44
NorthBound AM Peak Hour 09:00‐09:59 10:00‐10:59
SouthBound AM Peak Hour 08:00‐08:59 08:00‐08:59
Total AM Peak Hour 08:00‐08:59 08:00‐08:59
NorthBound AM Peak Hourly Volume 21 19
SouthBound AM Peak Hourly Volume 26 24
Total AM Peak Hourly Volume 47 43
NorthBound PM Peak Hour 15:00‐15:59 20:00‐20:59
SouthBound PM Peak Hour 15:00‐15:59 14:00‐14:59
Total PM Peak Hour 15:00‐15:59 14:00‐14:59
NorthBound PM Peak Hourly Volume 34 26
SouthBound PM Peak Hourly Volume 37 41
Total PM Peak Hourly Volume 71 67

Survey Count Job2022-0271-1 Contact: (949) 543 5756
For TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY
Location Powhatan Rd Betweet Navajo Rd and Central Rd
Task Speed and ADT
Study Name 3AppleValley0515
Study ID 9579077137
Device Serial Number CA:45:09:57:55:59
Location (Google Maps link) http://maps.google.com/maps?z=12&t=m&q=loc:34.496864788266464,‐117.18475246812888 Time Zone America/Los_Angeles ‐ Pacific Daylight Time
******** ********
Daily Summary
5/17/2022 5/18/2022
EastBound Volume 1735 1708
WestBound Volume 2085 1970
Total Volume 3820 3678
EastBound Average Speed 36 36
WestBound Average Speed 38 38
Total Average Speed 37 37
EastBound 85th Percentile Speed 41 42
WestBound 85th Percentile Speed 44 45
Total 85th Percentile Speed 44 44
EastBound AM Peak Hour 07:00‐07:59 11:00‐11:59
WestBound AM Peak Hour 11:00‐11:59 11:00‐11:59
Total AM Peak Hour 11:00‐11:59 11:00‐11:59
EastBound AM Peak Hourly Volume 116 129
WestBound AM Peak Hourly Volume 147 146
Total AM Peak Hourly Volume 263 275
EastBound PM Peak Hour 14:00‐14:59 14:00‐14:59
WestBound PM Peak Hour 16:00‐16:59 16:00‐16:59
Total PM Peak Hour 16:00‐16:59 16:00‐16:59
EastBound PM Peak Hourly Volume 153 149
WestBound PM Peak Hourly Volume 206 211
Total PM Peak Hourly Volume 359 360

Survey Count Job2022-0277 Contact: (949) 543 5756
For TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY
Location Ramona Ave from Navajo Rd to Central Rd
Task ADT&Speed
Study Name RedoLocation4
Study ID 6590456132
Device Serial Number CA:45:09:57:55:59
Location (Google Maps lihttp://maps.google.com/maps?z=12&t=m&q=loc:34.51519150476605,‐117.18323716875068 Time Zone America/Los_Angeles ‐ Pacific Daylight Time
******** ********
Daily Summary
8/30/2022 8/31/2022
EastBound Volume 1719 1765
WestBound Volume 1322 1364
Total Volume 3041 3129
EastBound Average Speed 44 44
WestBound Average Speed 44 44
Total Average Speed 44 44
EastBound 85th Percentile Speed 50 50
WestBound 85th Percentile Speed 50 50
Total 85th Percentile Speed 50 50
EastBound AM Peak Hour 08:00‐08:59 08:00‐08:59
WestBound AM Peak Hour 07:00‐07:59 07:00‐07:59
Total AM Peak Hour 08:00‐08:59 08:00‐08:59
EastBound AM Peak Hourly Volume 169 171
WestBound AM Peak Hourly Volume 129 120
Total AM Peak Hourly Volume 298 291
EastBound PM Peak Hour 15:00‐15:59 12:00‐12:59
WestBound PM Peak Hour 14:00‐14:59 12:00‐12:59
Total PM Peak Hour 15:00‐15:59 12:00‐12:59
EastBound PM Peak Hourly Volume 168 153
WestBound PM Peak Hourly Volume 139 134
Total PM Peak Hourly Volume 307 287

Survey Count Job2022-0271-1 Contact: (949) 543 5756
For TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY
Location Ramona Rd Between Navajo Rd and Thunderbird Rd Task Speed and ADT
Study Name 5AApplevalley0508
Study ID 4459547306
Device Serial Number C2:CC:A0:1A:96:14
Location (Google Maps l http://maps.google.com/maps?z=12&t=m&q=loc:34.526964473388105,‐117.19473392845994 Time Zone America/Los_Angeles ‐ Pacific Daylight Time
******** ********
Daily Summary
5/10/2022 5/11/2022
EastBound Volume 107 117
WestBound Volume 105 105
Total Volume 212 222
EastBound Average Speed 30 31
WestBound Average Speed 32 30
Total Average Speed 31 31
EastBound 85th Percentile Speed 37 37
WestBound 85th Percentile Speed 44 41
Total 85th Percentile Speed 40 39
EastBound AM Peak Hour 07:00‐07:59 11:00‐11:59
WestBound AM Peak Hour 07:00‐07:59 08:00‐08:59
Total AM Peak Hour 07:00‐07:59 11:00‐11:59
EastBound AM Peak Hourly Volume 9 11
WestBound AM Peak Hourly Volume 9 9
Total AM Peak Hourly Volume 18 20
EastBound PM Peak Hour 17:00‐17:59 14:00‐14:59
WestBound PM Peak Hour 15:00‐15:59 17:00‐17:59
Total PM Peak Hour 15:00‐15:59 17:00‐17:59
EastBound PM Peak Hourly Volume 12 10
WestBound PM Peak Hourly Volume 12 12
Total PM Peak Hourly Volume 24 22

Survey Count Job2022-0271-1 Contact: (949) 543 5756
For TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY
Location Ramona Rd Between Navajo Rd and Thunderbird Rd Task Speed and ADT
Study Name 5AppleValley0508
Study ID 1846210768
Device Serial Number EC:BC:62:09:1F:D2
Location (Google Maps l http://maps.google.com/maps?z=12&t=m&q=loc:34.518078966098486,‐117.19674420553929 Time Zone America/Los_Angeles ‐ Pacific Daylight Time
******** ********
Daily Summary
5/10/2022 5/11/2022
EastBound Volume 709 747
WestBound Volume 807 814
Total Volume 1516 1561
EastBound Average Speed 41 41
WestBound Average Speed 41 42
Total Average Speed 41 42
EastBound 85th Percentile Speed 48 49
WestBound 85th Percentile Speed 48 49
Total 85th Percentile Speed 48 49
EastBound AM Peak Hour 08:00‐08:59 08:00‐08:59
WestBound AM Peak Hour 07:00‐07:59 08:00‐08:59
Total AM Peak Hour 07:00‐07:59 08:00‐08:59
EastBound AM Peak Hourly Volume 46 55
WestBound AM Peak Hourly Volume 68 74
Total AM Peak Hourly Volume 114 129
EastBound PM Peak Hour 15:00‐15:59 17:00‐17:59
WestBound PM Peak Hour 15:00‐15:59 14:00‐14:59
Total PM Peak Hour 15:00‐15:59 14:00‐14:59
EastBound PM Peak Hourly Volume 73 59
WestBound PM Peak Hourly Volume 74 66
Total PM Peak Hourly Volume 147 125

Survey Count Job2022-0271-1 Contact: (949) 543 5756
For TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY
Location Rimrock Rd Between Corwin Rd and Hw18
Task Speed and ADT
Study Name 6AppleValley0515
Study ID 5923722964
Device Serial Number EC:BC:62:09:1F:D2
Location (Google Maps link) http://maps.google.com/maps?z=12&t=m&q=loc:34.54686334359893,‐117.23641902219246 Time Zone America/Los_Angeles ‐ Pacific Daylight Time
******** ********
Daily Summary
5/17/2022 5/18/2022
SouthBound Volume 123 124
NorthBound Volume 212 179
Total Volume 335 303
SouthBound Average Speed 33 35
NorthBound Average Speed 36 37
Total Average Speed 35 36
SouthBound 85th Percentile Speed 40 41
NorthBound 85th Percentile Speed 44 45
Total 85th Percentile Speed 42 44
SouthBound AM Peak Hour 11:00‐11:59 07:00‐07:59
NorthBound AM Peak Hour 08:00‐08:59 11:00‐11:59
Total AM Peak Hour 08:00‐08:59 11:00‐11:59
SouthBound AM Peak Hourly Volume 9 8
NorthBound AM Peak Hourly Volume 20 15
Total AM Peak Hourly Volume 29 23
SouthBound PM Peak Hour 14:00‐14:59 14:00‐14:59
NorthBound PM Peak Hour 15:00‐15:59 12:00‐12:59
Total PM Peak Hour 15:00‐15:59 12:00‐12:59
SouthBound PM Peak Hourly Volume 16 14
NorthBound PM Peak Hourly Volume 20 20
Total PM Peak Hourly Volume 36 34

Survey Count Job2022-0271-1 Contact: (949) 543 5756
For TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY
Location Seneca Rd Between Apple Valley Rd & Riverside Dr Task Speed and ADT
Study Name 7AppleValley0501
Study ID 4059281967
Device Serial Number C2:CC:A0:1A:96:14
Location (Google Maps link) http://maps.google.com/maps?z=12&t=m&q=loc:34.51474339136355,‐117.2491858189534 Time Zone America/Los_Angeles ‐ Pacific Daylight Time
******** ********
Daily Summary
5/3/2022 5/4/2022
EastBound Volume 407 401
WestBound Volume 384 366
Total Volume 791 767
EastBound Average Speed 40 40
WestBound Average Speed 44 44
Total Average Speed 42 42
EastBound 85th Percentile Speed 48 48
WestBound 85th Percentile Speed 51 52
Total 85th Percentile Speed 50 50
EastBound AM Peak Hour 06:00‐06:59 07:00‐07:59
WestBound AM Peak Hour 08:00‐08:59 08:00‐08:59
Total AM Peak Hour 06:00‐06:59 07:00‐07:59
EastBound AM Peak Hourly Volume 29 32
WestBound AM Peak Hourly Volume 28 30
Total AM Peak Hourly Volume 57 62
EastBound PM Peak Hour 15:00‐15:59 14:00‐14:59
WestBound PM Peak Hour 15:00‐15:59 13:00‐13:59
Total PM Peak Hour 15:00‐15:59 14:00‐14:59
EastBound PM Peak Hourly Volume 56 45
WestBound PM Peak Hourly Volume 45 30
Total PM Peak Hourly Volume 101 75

Survey Count Job2022-0271-1 Contact: (949) 543 5756
For TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY
Location Symeron Rd Between Apple Valley Rd &Riverside Dr Task Speed and ADT
Study Name 8AppleValley0501
Study ID 5810165458
Device Serial Number DE:28:AB:39:D5:DC
Location (Google Maps l http://maps.google.com/maps?z=12&t=m&q=loc:34.52938334139895,‐117.26312973304576 Time Zone America/Los_Angeles ‐ Pacific Daylight Time
******** ********
Daily Summary
5/3/2022 5/4/2022
EastBound Volume 477 481
WestBound Volume 389 449
Total Volume 866 930
EastBound Average Speed 31 32
WestBound Average Speed 35 35
Total Average Speed 32 33
EastBound 85th Percentile Speed 42 41
WestBound 85th Percentile Speed 44 43
Total 85th Percentile Speed 43 42
EastBound AM Peak Hour 08:00‐08:59 08:00‐08:59
WestBound AM Peak Hour 08:00‐08:59 08:00‐08:59
Total AM Peak Hour 08:00‐08:59 08:00‐08:59
EastBound AM Peak Hourly Volume 110 114
WestBound AM Peak Hourly Volume 87 97
Total AM Peak Hourly Volume 197 211
EastBound PM Peak Hour 15:00‐15:59 14:00‐14:59
WestBound PM Peak Hour 15:00‐15:59 13:00‐13:59
Total PM Peak Hour 15:00‐15:59 14:00‐14:59
EastBound PM Peak Hourly Volume 126 117
WestBound PM Peak Hourly Volume 56 61
Total PM Peak Hourly Volume 182 178

Survey Count Job2022-0271-1 Contact: (949) 543 5756
For TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY
Location Tonikan Rd Between Thunerbird Rd and Ramona Ave Task Speed and ADT
Study Name 9AppleValley0508
Study ID 1170816985
Device Serial Number DE:28:AB:39:D5:DC
Location (Google Maps link) http://maps.google.com/maps?z=12&t=m&q=loc:34.52449455860503,‐117.17779666196292 Time Zone America/Los_Angeles ‐ Pacific Daylight Time
******** ********
Daily Summary
5/10/2022 5/11/2022
NorthBound Volume 123 110
SouthBound Volume 134 125
Total Volume 257 235
NorthBound Average Speed 31 32
SouthBound Average Speed 31 32
Total Average Speed 31 32
NorthBound 85th Percentile Speed 38 38
SouthBound 85th Percentile Speed 40 40
Total 85th Percentile Speed 39 39
NorthBound AM Peak Hour 09:00‐09:59 07:00‐07:59
SouthBound AM Peak Hour 08:00‐08:59 08:00‐08:59
Total AM Peak Hour 08:00‐08:59 08:00‐08:59
NorthBound AM Peak Hourly Volume 9 9
SouthBound AM Peak Hourly Volume 9 11
Total AM Peak Hourly Volume 18 20
NorthBound PM Peak Hour 18:00‐18:59 14:00‐14:59
SouthBound PM Peak Hour 17:00‐17:59 13:00‐13:59
Total PM Peak Hour 17:00‐17:59 13:00‐13:59
NorthBound PM Peak Hourly Volume 15 12
SouthBound PM Peak Hourly Volume 16 12
Total PM Peak Hourly Volume 31 24

Survey Count Job2022-0271-1 Contact: (949) 543 5756
For TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY
Location Yucca Loma Rd Between Apple Valley Rd & Kiowa Rd Task Speed and ADT
Study Name 10AAppleValley0508
Study ID 9232382712
Device Serial Number CA:45:09:57:55:59
Location (Google Maps link) http://maps.google.com/maps?z=12&t=m&q=loc:34.50040329250936,‐117.21649649563916 Time Zone America/Los_Angeles ‐ Pacific Daylight Time
******** ********
Daily Summary
5/10/2022 5/11/2022
EastBound Volume 3381 3399
WestBound Volume 3645 3759
Total Volume 7026 7158
EastBound Average Speed 48 49
WestBound Average Speed 51 51
Total Average Speed 49 50
EastBound 85th Percentile Speed 54 54
WestBound 85th Percentile Speed 57 58
Total 85th Percentile Speed 56 56
EastBound AM Peak Hour 08:00‐08:59 08:00‐08:59
WestBound AM Peak Hour 08:00‐08:59 07:00‐07:59
Total AM Peak Hour 08:00‐08:59 07:00‐07:59
EastBound AM Peak Hourly Volume 211 211
WestBound AM Peak Hourly Volume 338 323
Total AM Peak Hourly Volume 549 534
EastBound PM Peak Hour 15:00‐15:59 17:00‐17:59
WestBound PM Peak Hour 15:00‐15:59 13:00‐13:59
Total PM Peak Hour 15:00‐15:59 17:00‐17:59
EastBound PM Peak Hourly Volume 324 297
WestBound PM Peak Hourly Volume 330 281
Total PM Peak Hourly Volume 654 578

Survey Count Job2022-0271-1 Contact: (949) 543 5756
For TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY
Location Yucca Loma Rd Between Apple Valley Rd & Kiowa Rd Task Speed and ADT
Study Name 10AppleValley0501
Study ID 1585727105
Device Serial Number EC:BC:62:09:1F:D2
Location (Google Maps l http://maps.google.com/maps?z=12&t=m&q=loc:34.50041917621577,‐117.227006647845 Time Zone America/Los_Angeles ‐ Pacific Daylight Time
******** ********
Daily Summary
5/3/2022 5/4/2022
EastBound Volume 4894 4963
WestBound Volume 5351 5523
Total Volume 10245 10486
EastBound Average Speed 40 40
WestBound Average Speed 44 44
Total Average Speed 42 42
EastBound 85th Percentile Speed 45 45
WestBound 85th Percentile Speed 49 49
Total 85th Percentile Speed 48 48
EastBound AM Peak Hour 11:00‐11:59 08:00‐08:59
WestBound AM Peak Hour 07:00‐07:59 07:00‐07:59
Total AM Peak Hour 07:00‐07:59 07:00‐07:59
EastBound AM Peak Hourly Volume 282 267
WestBound AM Peak Hourly Volume 461 470
Total AM Peak Hourly Volume 743 737
EastBound PM Peak Hour 16:00‐16:59 17:00‐17:59
WestBound PM Peak Hour 15:00‐15:59 15:00‐15:59
Total PM Peak Hour 16:00‐16:59 17:00‐17:59
EastBound PM Peak Hourly Volume 502 479
WestBound PM Peak Hourly Volume 422 404
Total PM Peak Hourly Volume 924 883

Survey Count Job2022-0271-1 Contact: (949) 543 5756
For TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY
Location Nokomis Rd Between Symeron Rd &Riverside Dr
Task Speed and ADT
Study Name 11AppleValley0501
Study ID 7141651906
Device Serial Number EE:9C:DA:6B:B7:47
Location (Google Maps l http://maps.google.com/maps?z=12&t=m&q=loc:34.52301731336165,‐117.26151978286101 Time Zone America/Los_Angeles ‐ Pacific Daylight Time
******** ********
Daily Summary
5/3/2022 5/4/2022
NorthBound Volume 244 257
SouthBound Volume 267 246
Total Volume 511 503
NorthBound Average Speed 35 36
SouthBound Average Speed 33 33
Total Average Speed 34 34
NorthBound 85th Percentile Speed 42 43
SouthBound 85th Percentile Speed 42 41
Total 85th Percentile Speed 42 43
NorthBound AM Peak Hour 08:00‐08:59 07:00‐07:59
SouthBound AM Peak Hour 07:00‐07:59 08:00‐08:59
Total AM Peak Hour 08:00‐08:59 07:00‐07:59
NorthBound AM Peak Hourly Volume 35 33
SouthBound AM Peak Hourly Volume 17 20
Total AM Peak Hourly Volume 52 53
NorthBound PM Peak Hour 15:00‐15:59 14:00‐14:59
SouthBound PM Peak Hour 15:00‐15:59 14:00‐14:59
Total PM Peak Hour 15:00‐15:59 14:00‐14:59
NorthBound PM Peak Hourly Volume 20 19
SouthBound PM Peak Hourly Volume 43 32
Total PM Peak Hourly Volume 63 51

Survey Count Job2022-0271-1 Contact: (949) 543 5756
For TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY
Location Waalew Rd Between Corwin Rd and Dale Evans Parkway Task Speed and ADT
Study Name 12AppleValley0515
Study ID 3089186204
Device Serial Number DE:28:AB:39:D5:DC
Location (Google Maps link) http://maps.google.com/maps?z=12&t=m&q=loc:34.556901678475135,‐117.21491030428298 Time Zone America/Los_Angeles ‐ Pacific Daylight Time
******** ********
Daily Summary
5/17/2022 5/18/2022
WestBound Volume 725 322
EastBound Volume 2075 2102
Total Volume 2800 2424
WestBound Average Speed 48 39
EastBound Average Speed 44 44
Total Average Speed 45 43
WestBound 85th Percentile Speed 59 54
EastBound 85th Percentile Speed 53 52
Total 85th Percentile Speed 55 53
WestBound AM Peak Hour 10:00‐10:59 08:00‐08:59
EastBound AM Peak Hour 08:00‐08:59 08:00‐08:59
Total AM Peak Hour 08:00‐08:59 08:00‐08:59
WestBound AM Peak Hourly Volume 63 22
EastBound AM Peak Hourly Volume 138 139
Total AM Peak Hourly Volume 201 161
WestBound PM Peak Hour 14:00‐14:59 14:00‐14:59
EastBound PM Peak Hour 17:00‐17:59 17:00‐17:59
Total PM Peak Hour 17:00‐17:59 17:00‐17:59
WestBound PM Peak Hourly Volume 105 56
EastBound PM Peak Hourly Volume 218 193
Total PM Peak Hourly Volume 323 249

Survey Count Job2022-0271-1 Contact: (949) 543 5756
For TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY
Location Ottawa Rd Between Navajo Rd and Central Rd
Task Speed and ADT
Study Name 13AppleValley0515
Study ID 7931614547
Device Serial Number C2:CC:A0:1A:96:14
Location (Google Maps link) http://maps.google.com/maps?z=12&t=m&q=loc:34.49339032176378,‐117.18476277786978 Time Zone America/Los_Angeles ‐ Pacific Daylight Time
******** ********
Daily Summary
5/17/2022 5/18/2022
NorthBound Volume 725 725
SouthBound Volume 794 768
Total Volume 1519 1493
NorthBound Average Speed 34 36
SouthBound Average Speed 38 38
Total Average Speed 36 37
NorthBound 85th Percentile Speed 43 44
SouthBound 85th Percentile Speed 46 47
Total 85th Percentile Speed 44 45
NorthBound AM Peak Hour 11:00‐11:59 08:00‐08:59
SouthBound AM Peak Hour 07:00‐07:59 07:00‐07:59
Total AM Peak Hour 07:00‐07:59 07:00‐07:59
NorthBound AM Peak Hourly Volume 42 54
SouthBound AM Peak Hourly Volume 62 55
Total AM Peak Hourly Volume 104 109
NorthBound PM Peak Hour 16:00‐16:59 17:00‐17:59
SouthBound PM Peak Hour 15:00‐15:59 12:00‐12:59
Total PM Peak Hour 16:00‐16:59 17:00‐17:59
NorthBound PM Peak Hourly Volume 81 81
SouthBound PM Peak Hourly Volume 58 57
Total PM Peak Hourly Volume 139 138

Appendix D
SWITRS 2019-2021 Collision Table

1 Complaint of Pain Fatal Property Damage Only Severe Injury Visible Injury Grand Total APPLE VALLEY RD & HWY 18 5 15 1 2 23APPLE VALLEY RD & MONDAMON RD 4 6 2 12APPLE VALLEY RD & POTOMAC RD 1 2 1 4APPLE VALLEY RD & QUANTICO RD 1 4 5APPLE VALLEY RD & SYMERON RD 1 1 1A Total 12 0 27 1 5 45
APPLE VALLEY RD & TUSCOLA RD 2 1 1 1 5APPLE VALLEY RD & KEOTA RD 1 1 APPLE VALLEY RD & KINAI RD 1 1APPLE VALLEY RD & MANDAN RD 6 6APPLE VALLEY RD & RED FEATHER RD 11APPLE VALLEY RD & SENECA RD 1 3 1 5APPLE VALLEY RD & SHOSHONEE RD 3 2 1 6APPLE VALLEY RD & YAQUI RD 1 23APPLE VALLEY RD & YUCCA LOMA RD 3 5 1 9 1 Total 11 0 18 1 7 37
2 Complaint of Pain Fatal Property Damage Only Severe Injury Visible Injury Grand Total NANTICOKE & SHANDIN RD 11NANTICOKE RD & RAMONA AV 1 1NANTICOKE RD & THUNDERBIRD RD 0 Total 1 0 1 0 0 2
3 Complaint of Pain Fatal Property Damage Only Severe Injury Visible Injury Grand Total NAVAJO RD & POWHATAN RD 4 9 3 16POWHATAN RD & QUINNAULT RD 11 Total 4 0 9 0 4 17
4 POWHATAN RD - NAVAJO ROAD TO CENTRAL ROAD
Collision Severity (SWITRS 2019-2021)

RAMONA AVE - NAVAJO ROAD TO CENTRAL ROAD
APPLE VALLEY RD - YUCCA LOMA ROAD TO HWY 18
Collision Severity (SWITRS 2019-2021)

NANTICOKE RD - RAMONA AVE TO THUNDERBIRD RD
Collision Severity (SWITRS 2019-2021)

Complaint of Pain Fatal Property Damage Only Severe Injury Visible Injury Grand Total CENTRAL RD & RAMONA AV 1 1NANTICOKE RD & RAMONA AV 1 1PIONEER RD & RAMONA AV 11QUINNAULT RD & RAMONA AV 11RAMONA AV & TONIKAN RD 1 1NAVAJO RD & RAMONA AV 22 Total 3 0 3 0 1 7
5 Complaint of Pain Fatal Property Damage Only Severe Injury Visible Injury Grand Total NAVAJO RD & RAMONA AV 11FLATHEAD RD & RAMONA AV 1 1IROQUOIS RD & RAMONA AV 11RAMONA AV & STANDING ROCK AV (South) 1 1 5 Total 1 0 3 0 0 4
RAMONA AV & STANDING ROCK AV (North) 0RAMONA AV & THUNDERBIRD RD 1 1 5A Total 0 0 1 0 0 1
6 Complaint of Pain Fatal Property Damage Only Severe Injury Visible Injury Grand Total ALLEGHENY RD & RIMROCK RD 11 2HWY 18 & RIMROCK RD 1 4 5 Total 1 0 5 1 0 7
7 Complaint of Pain Fatal Property Damage Only Severe Injury Visible Injury Grand Total APPLE VALLEY RD & SENECA RD 1 1 2MANDAN RD & SENECA RD 1 1RIVERSIDE DR & SENECA RD 0 Total 2 0 1 0 0 3

SENECA RD - APPLE VALLEY ROAD TO RIVERSIDE DRIVE
Collision Severity (SWITRS 2019-2021)

RAMONA AVE - NAVAJO ROAD TO THUNDERBIRD ROAD
Collision Severity (SWITRS 2019-2021)
RIMROCK RD - HWY 18 TO CORWIN ROAD
Collision Severity (SWITRS 2019-2021)Collision Severity (SWITRS 2019-2021)

8 Complaint of Pain Fatal Property Damage Only Severe Injury Visible Injury Grand Total APPLE VALLEY RD & SYMERON RD 1 1SYMERON RD & TUSCOLA RD 11 Total 1 0 1 0 0 2
9 Complaint of Pain Fatal Property Damage Only Severe Injury Visible Injury Grand Total RAMONA AV & TONIKAN RD 1 1
Total 1 0 0 0 0 1
10 Complaint of Pain Fatal Property Damage Only Severe Injury Visible Injury Grand Total APPLE VALLEY RD & YUCCA LOMA RD 3 4 2 9CRONESE RD & YUCCA LOMA RD 1 12 DELAWARE RD & YUCCA LOMA RD 11HOPI RD & YUCCA LOMA RD 1 12IROQUOIS RD & YUCCA LOMA RD 1 1JICARILLA RD & YUCCA LOMA RD 2 2KIOWA RD & YUCCA LOMA RD 6 17QUAPAW RD & YUCCA LOMA RD 22RINCON RD & YUCCA LOMA RD (West) 1 2 3 10 Total 4 1 18 0 6 29
RINCON RD & YUCCA LOMA RD (East) 3 1 4SEMINOLE RD & YUCCA LOMA RD 1 1 1 3 10A Total 0 0 4 1 2 7
11 Complaint of Pain Fatal Property Damage Only Severe Injury Visible Injury Grand Total NOKOMIS RD & RIVERSIDE DR 22
Total 0 0 2 0 0 2

TONIKAN RD - RAMONA AVENUE TO THUNDERBIRD ROAD
Collision Severity (SWITRS 2019-2021)

YUCCA LOMA RD - APPLE VALLEY ROAD TO KIOWA ROAD
Collision Severity (SWITRS 2019-2021)

NOKOMIS RD - SYMERON ROAD TO RIVERSIDE DRIVE
Collision Severity (SWITRS 2019-2021)

SYMERON RD - APPLE VALLEY ROAD TO RIVERSIDE DRIVE
Collision Severity (SWITRS 2019-2021)

12 Complaint of Pain Fatal Property Damage Only Severe Injury Visible Injury Grand Total CORWIN RD & WAALEW RD 3 1 4DALE EVANS PKWY & WAALEW RD 4 4 Total 3 0 5 0 0 8
13 Complaint of Pain Fatal Property Damage Only Severe Injury Visible Injury Grand Total CENTRAL RD & OTTAWA RD 11NAVAJO RD & OTTAWA RD 1 4 3 8
Total 1 0 5 0 3 9

OTTAWA RD - NAVAJO ROAD TO CENTRAL ROAD
Collision Severity (SWITRS 2019-2021)

WAALEW RD - CORWIN ROAD TO DALE EVANS PKWY
Collision Severity (SWITRS 2019-2021)

1 Collision Severity (SWITRS 2019-2021)
Broadside Head-On Hit Object Not Stated Other Overturned Rear End Sideswipe Vehicle/Pedestrian Grand Total APPLE VALLEY RD & HWY 18 8 1 1 1 8 4 23APPLE VALLEY RD & MONDAMON RD 3 1 7 1 12APPLE VALLEY RD & POTOMAC RD 1 1 1 1 4APPLE VALLEY RD & QUANTICO RD 2 2 15 APPLE VALLEY RD & SYMERON RD 1 1
1A Total 15 3 2 1 0 3 15 6 0 45 1.08
1 1 1 13 1 17 Unsafe Speed
APPLE VALLEY RD & TUSCOLA RD 1 1 2 1 5APPLE VALLEY RD & KEOTA RD 11APPLE VALLEY RD & KINAI RD 11APPLE VALLEY RD & MANDAN RD 1 41 6APPLE VALLEY RD & RED FEATHER RD 1 1 APPLE VALLEY RD & SENECA RD 2 3 5APPLE VALLEY RD & SHOSHONEE RD 1 1 4 6APPLE VALLEY RD & YAQUI RD 1 23APPLE VALLEY RD & YUCCA LOMA RD 4 1 1 1 2 9 1 Total 9 1 3 2 0 0 18 4 0 37 1.08
1 1 15 1 18 Unsafe Speed
2 Collision Severity (SWITRS 2019-2021)
Broadside Head-On Hit Object Not Stated Other Overturned Rear End Sideswipe Vehicle/Pedestrian Grand Total NANTICOKE & SHANDIN RD 1 1
NANTICOKE RD & RAMONA AV 11
NANTICOKE RD & THUNDERBIRD RD 0
Total 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 1.08
1 1 2 Unsafe Speed
3 Collision Severity (SWITRS 2019-2021)
Broadside Head-On Hit Object Not Stated Other Overturned Rear End Sideswipe Vehicle/Pedestrian Grand Total NAVAJO RD & POWHATAN RD 6 6 1 2 1 16POWHATAN RD & QUINNAULT RD 1 1 Total 6 7 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 17 1.08
1 1 Unsafe Speed
4 Collision Severity (SWITRS 2019-2021)
Broadside Head-On Hit Object Not Stated Other Overturned Rear End Sideswipe Vehicle/Pedestrian Grand Total CENTRAL RD & RAMONA AV 11NANTICOKE RD & RAMONA AV 11
PIONEER RD & RAMONA AV 1 1
Type of Collision (SWITRS 2019-2021) CA Statwide ACC/MVM Rate (2019)

RAMONA AVE - NAVAJO ROAD TO CENTRAL ROAD
Type of Collision (SWITRS 2019-2021) CA Statwide ACC/MVM Rate (2019)

POWHATAN RD - NAVAJO ROAD TO CENTRAL ROAD
Type of Collision (SWITRS 2019-2021) CA Statwide ACC/MVM Rate (2019)
APPLE VALLEY RD - YUCCA LOMA ROAD TO HWY 18

NANTICOKE RD - RAMONA AVE TO THUNDERBIRD RD
Type of Collision (SWITRS 2019-2021) CA Statwide ACC/MVM Rate (2019)

QUINNAULT RD & RAMONA AV 1 1
RAMONA AV & TONIKAN RD 1 1NAVAJO RD & RAMONA AV 1 12
Total 2 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 7 1.08
1 1 Unsafe Speed
5 Collision Severity (SWITRS 2019-2021)
Broadside Head-On Hit Object Not Stated Other Overturned Rear End Sideswipe Vehicle/Pedestrian Grand Total NAVAJO RD & RAMONA AV 1 1
FLATHEAD RD & RAMONA AV 1 1
IROQUOIS RD & RAMONA AV 1 1RAMONA AV & STANDING ROCK AV (South) 1 1 5 Total 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1.08
0 Unsafe Speed
RAMONA AV & STANDING ROCK AV (North) 0RAMONA AV & THUNDERBIRD RD 1 1 5A Total 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1.08
0 Unsafe Speed
6 Collision Severity (SWITRS 2019-2021)
Broadside Head-On Hit Object Not Stated Other Overturned Rear End Sideswipe Vehicle/Pedestrian Grand Total ALLEGHENY RD & RIMROCK RD 2 2HWY 18 & RIMROCK RD 2 1 2 5 Total 2 0 2 1 0 0 0 2 0 7 1.08
1 1 2 Unsafe Speed
7 Collision Severity (SWITRS 2019-2021)
Broadside Head-On Hit Object Not Stated Other Overturned Rear End Sideswipe Vehicle/Pedestrian Grand Total APPLE VALLEY RD & SENECA RD 1 1 2MANDAN RD & SENECA RD 11RIVERSIDE DR & SENECA RD 0 Total 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 3 1.08
1 1 2 Unsafe Speed
8 Collision Severity (SWITRS 2019-2021)
Broadside Head-On Hit Object Not Stated Other Overturned Rear End Sideswipe Vehicle/Pedestrian Grand Total APPLE VALLEY RD & SYMERON RD 1 1SYMERON RD & TUSCOLA RD 11 Total 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 1.08
0 Unsafe Speed
Type of Collision (SWITRS 2019-2021) CA Statwide ACC/MVM Rate (2019)

SYMERON RD - APPLE VALLEY ROAD TO RIVERSIDE DRIVE
Type of Collision (SWITRS 2019-2021) CA Statwide ACC/MVM Rate (2019)
Type of Collision (SWITRS 2019-2021) CA Statwide ACC/MVM Rate (2019)

SENECA RD - APPLE VALLEY ROAD TO RIVERSIDE DRIVE
RIMROCK RD - HWY 18 TO CORWIN ROAD
Type of Collision (SWITRS 2019-2021) CA Statwide ACC/MVM Rate (2019)

RAMONA AVE - NAVAJO ROAD TO THUNDERBIRD ROAD

9 Collision Severity (SWITRS 2019-2021)
Broadside Head-On Hit Object Not Stated Other Overturned Rear End Sideswipe Vehicle/Pedestrian Grand Total RAMONA AV & TONIKAN RD 1 1
Total 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1.08
0 Unsafe Speed
10 Collision Severity (SWITRS 2019-2021)
Broadside Head-On Hit Object Not Stated Other Overturned Rear End Sideswipe Vehicle/Pedestrian Grand Total APPLE VALLEY RD & YUCCA LOMA RD 5 1 1 2 9CRONESE RD & YUCCA LOMA RD 2 2 DELAWARE RD & YUCCA LOMA RD 1 1HOPI RD & YUCCA LOMA RD 1 1 2IROQUOIS RD & YUCCA LOMA RD 1 1JICARILLA RD & YUCCA LOMA RD 1 1 2KIOWA RD & YUCCA LOMA RD 3 2 1 1 7QUAPAW RD & YUCCA LOMA RD 2 2RINCON RD & YUCCA LOMA RD (West) 2 1 3 10 Total 15 3 6 1 0 0 1 3 0 29 1.08
1 1 1 3 Unsafe Speed
RINCON RD & YUCCA LOMA RD (East) 3 14SEMINOLE RD & YUCCA LOMA RD 2 1 3 10A Total 5 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 7 1.08
1 1 Unsafe Speed
11 Collision Severity (SWITRS 2019-2021)
Broadside Head-On Hit Object Not Stated Other Overturned Rear End Sideswipe Vehicle/Pedestrian Grand Total NOKOMIS RD & RIVERSIDE DR 1 1 2
Total 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 1.08
1 1 Unsafe Speed
12 Collision Severity (SWITRS 2019-2021)
Broadside Head-On Hit Object Not Stated Other Overturned Rear End Sideswipe Vehicle/Pedestrian Grand Total CORWIN RD & WAALEW RD 1 12 4
DALE EVANS PKWY & WAALEW RD 1 1 1 1 4
Total 2 1 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 8 1.08
1 2 3 Unsafe Speed
13 Collision Severity (SWITRS 2019-2021)
Broadside Head-On Hit Object Not Stated Other Overturned Rear End Sideswipe Vehicle/Pedestrian Grand Total CENTRAL RD & OTTAWA RD 1 1
Type of Collision (SWITRS 2019-2021) CA Statwide ACC/MVM Rate (2019)

OTTAWA RD - NAVAJO ROAD TO CENTRAL ROAD
Type of Collision (SWITRS 2019-2021) CA Statwide ACC/MVM Rate (2019)
Type of Collision (SWITRS 2019-2021) CA Statwide ACC/MVM Rate (2019)

NOKOMIS RD - SYMERON ROAD TO RIVERSIDE DRIVE

WAALEW RD - CORWIN ROAD TO DALE EVANS PKWY
Type of Collision (SWITRS 2019-2021) CA Statwide ACC/MVM Rate (2019)
Type of Collision (SWITRS 2019-2021) CA Statwide ACC/MVM Rate (2019)

TONIKAN RD - RAMONA AVENUE TO THUNDERBIRD ROAD

YUCCA LOMA RD - APPLE VALLEY ROAD TO KIOWA ROAD

NAVAJO RD & OTTAWA RD 7 1 8
Total 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 1.08
0 Unsafe Speed

Appendix E
Radar Speed Summary Sheets

MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Apple Valley Road
75 0 0 75 0
74 0 0 74 0
73 0 0 73 0 Between: Yucca Loma Road - Seneca Road
72 0 0 72 0
71 0 0 71 0
70 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69 0
68 0 0 68 0
67 0 0 67 0 Date:
66 0 0 66 0
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0 Time
63 0 0 63 0 From: 1:30
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0 Time
60 0 0 60 0 To: 1:50
59 2 0 59 X X 2
58 2 1 58 X X X 3 Existing
57 2 0 57 X X 2 Speed Limit: 55 MPH
56 1 0 56 X 1
55 3 0 55 X X X 3
54 5 4 54 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
53 4 3 53 X X X X X X X 7 *
52 4 5 52 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
51 8 3 51 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 50 7 5 50 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 A % Over Pace: 0% 2% 11% 49 1 4 49 X X X X X 5 C
48 1 6 48 X X X X X X X 7 E % In Pace: 76% 86% 79%
47 2 4 47 X X X X X X 6 *
46 0 3 46 X X X 3 * % Under Pace: 24% 12% 10%
45 4 6 45 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
44 1 2 44 X X X 3 Average Speed: 51 MPH 49 MPH 50 MPH
43 1 2 43 X X X 3
42 2 1 42 X X X 3 Pace Speed: 50 - 59 MPH 45 - 54 MPH 45 - 54 MPH 41 0 1 41 X 1
40 0 0 40 0
39 0 0 39 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 45 MPH 45 MPH 38 0 0 38 0
37 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 51 MPH 48 MPH 50 MPH 36 0 0 36 0
35 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 55 MPH 53 MPH 54 MPH 34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0
31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
Town of Apple Valley
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
5/10/22

MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Apple Valley Road
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Seneca Road - State Route 18
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 1 59 X 1
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 2 56 X X 2
55 1 1 55 X X 2
54 1 0 54 X 1 Time
53 0 3 53 X X X 3 From: 9:00
52 1 3 52 X X X X 4
51 3 1 51 X X X X 4 Time
50 1 1 50 X X 2 To: 9:30
49 1 5 49 X X X X X X 6 *
48 7 5 48 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * Existing
47 10 8 47 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 * Speed Limit: 50 MPH 46 9 3 46 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 P
45 3 5 45 X X X X X X X X 8 A
44 2 2 44 X X X X 4 C
43 0 2 43 X X 2 E
42 6 3 42 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
41 3 2 41 X X X X X 5 * Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 0 3 40 X X X 3 * % Over Pace: 6% 24% 19%
39 1 0 39 X 1
38 0 0 38 0 % In Pace: 84% 76% 79%
37 1 0 37 X 1
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 10% 0% 2%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 46 MPH 47 MPH 47 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 42 - 51 MPH 40 - 49 MPH 40 - 49 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 47 MPH 47 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 49 MPH 52 MPH 51 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
Town of Apple Valley
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
5/10/22

MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Nanticoke Road
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Ramona Avenue - Thunderbird Road
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 9:00
52 0 0 52 0
51 1 0 51 X 1 Time
50 0 0 50 0 To: 11:15
49 0 2 49 X X 2
48 1 1 48 X X 2 Existing
47 1 2 47 X X X 3 Speed Limit: N/P MPH
46 0 0 46 0
45 2 1 45 X X X 3
44 4 2 44 X X X X X X 6 *
43 9 2 43 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
42 1 2 42 X X X 3 *
41 4 2 41 X X X X X X 6 P Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 0 4 40 X X X X 4 A % Over Pace: 10% 28% 11%
39 3 3 39 X X X X X X 6 C
38 3 3 38 X X X X X X 6 E % In Pace: 64% 62% 57%
37 1 3 37 X X X X 4 *
36 3 1 36 X X X X 4 * % Under Pace: 26% 10% 32%
35 4 3 35 X X X X X X X 7 *
34 1 2 34 X X X 3 Average Speed: 38 MPH 37 MPH 38 MPH
33 1 3 33 X X X X 4
32 2 6 32 X X X X X X X X 8 Pace Speed: 35 - 44 MPH 31 - 40 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 31 3 3 31 X X X X X X 6
30 0 4 30 X X X X 4
29 1 0 29 X 1 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 31 MPH 31 MPH 31 MPH 28 3 1 28 X X X X 4
27 1 0 27 X 1 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 37 MPH 38 MPH 26 1 0 26 X 1
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 44 MPH 44 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
Town of Apple Valley
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
5/18/22

MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Powhatan Road
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Navajo Road - Central Road
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 2:15
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 1 51 X 1 Time
50 0 1 50 X 1 To: 2:35
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0 Existing
47 0 2 47 X X 2 Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 1 0 46 X 1
45 2 3 45 X X X X X 5
44 0 1 44 X 1
43 0 2 43 X X 2
42 0 5 42 X X X X X 5
41 2 3 41 X X X X X 5 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 3 2 40 X X X X X 5 * % Over Pace: 6% 20% 18%
39 8 3 39 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
38 7 4 38 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P % In Pace: 82% 72% 75% 37 6 5 37 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A
36 3 3 36 X X X X X X 6 C % Under Pace: 12% 8% 7%
35 3 3 35 X X X X X X 6 E
34 3 5 34 X X X X X X X X 8 * Average Speed: 36 MPH 39 MPH 38 MPH 33 3 3 33 X X X X X X 6 *
32 3 3 32 X X X X X X 6 * Pace Speed: 32 - 41 MPH 33 - 42 MPH 32 - 41 MPH 31 1 0 31 X 1
30 1 1 30 X X 2
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 32 MPH 34 MPH 33 MPH 28 2 0 28 X X 2
27 1 0 27 X 1 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 38 MPH 37 MPH 26 1 0 26 X 1
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 44 MPH 42 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
Town of Apple Valley
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
5/11/22

MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Ramona Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Navajo Road - Central Road
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 1 0 56 X 1
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 2 1 53 X X X 3 From: 9:00
52 1 2 52 X X X 3
51 1 2 51 X X X 3 Time
50 1 0 50 X 1 To: 9:30
49 0 0 49 0
48 2 5 48 X X X X X X X 7 * Existing
47 1 3 47 X X X X 4 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 2 4 46 X X X X X X 6 *
45 5 3 45 X X X X X X X X 8 P
44 2 5 44 X X X X X X X 7 A
43 7 5 43 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 C
42 6 5 42 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E
41 2 5 41 X X X X X X X 7 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 1 1 40 X X 2 * % Over Pace: 22% 10% 11%
39 1 4 39 X X X X X 5 *
38 2 1 38 X X X 3 % In Pace: 60% 80% 69%
37 1 2 37 X X X 3
36 3 1 36 X X X X 4 % Under Pace: 18% 10% 20%
35 4 0 35 X X X X 4
34 1 1 34 X X 2 Average Speed: 42 MPH 44 MPH 43 MPH
33 1 0 33 X 1
32 2 0 32 X X 2 Pace Speed: 36 - 45 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 1 0 29 X 1 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 35 MPH 39 MPH 37 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 48 MPH 48 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
Town of Apple Valley
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
5/11/22

MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Ramona Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Navajo Road - Standing Rock Avenue 62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 9:00
52 1 0 52 X 1
51 1 0 51 X 1 Time
50 1 1 50 X X 2 To: 9:50
49 0 2 49 X X 2
48 0 2 48 X X 2 Existing
47 0 0 47 0 Speed Limit: 35 MPH
46 2 2 46 X X X X 4
45 1 0 45 X 1
44 1 1 44 X X 2 *
43 6 3 43 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
42 1 4 42 X X X X X 5 *
41 2 2 41 X X X X 4 P Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 2 4 40 X X X X X X 6 A % Over Pace: 12% 14% 13%
39 2 3 39 X X X X X 5 C
38 7 4 38 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E % In Pace: 74% 62% 68% 37 4 4 37 X X X X X X X X 8 *
36 7 2 36 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Under Pace: 14% 24% 19% 35 5 4 35 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
34 1 1 34 X X 2 Average Speed: 39 MPH 38 MPH 38 MPH
33 2 1 33 X X X 3
32 0 2 32 X X 2 Pace Speed: 35 - 44 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 31 1 2 31 X X X 3
30 1 1 30 X X 2
29 1 3 29 X X X X 4 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 35 MPH 31 MPH 33 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 1 27 X 1 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 38 MPH 38 MPH 38 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 1 0 25 X 1 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 44 MPH 43 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 1 23 X 1
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
Town of Apple Valley
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
5/18/22

MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Ramona Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Standing Rock Avenue - Thunderbird Road 62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 9:15
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0 Time
50 0 0 50 0 To: 11:15
49 0 0 49 0
48 1 0 48 X 1 Existing
47 2 0 47 X X 2 Speed Limit: 35 MPH
46 0 0 46 0
45 0 0 45 0
44 1 2 44 X X X 3
43 0 0 43 0
42 1 1 42 X X 2
41 1 0 41 X 1 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 2 0 40 X X 2 % Over Pace: 24% 16% 28%
39 0 1 39 X 1
38 2 0 38 X X 2 % In Pace: 60% 76% 64%
37 1 2 37 X X X 3 *
36 1 1 36 X X 2 * % Under Pace: 16% 8% 8%
35 5 3 35 X X X X X X X X 8 *
34 1 2 34 X X X 3 P Average Speed: 36 MPH 33 MPH 35 MPH 33 0 0 33 0 A
32 1 3 32 X X X X 4 C Pace Speed: 31 - 40 MPH 28 - 37 MPH 28 - 37 MPH 31 2 1 31 X X X 3 E
30 0 4 30 X X X X 4 *
29 1 0 29 X 1 * 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 29 MPH 28 MPH 28 MPH 28 1 3 28 X X X X 4 *
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 35 MPH 32 MPH 35 MPH 26 0 1 26 X 1
25 2 0 25 X X 2 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 39 MPH 42 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 1 22 X 1
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 25 25 GRAND TOTALS 50
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
Town of Apple Valley
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
5/19/22

MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Rimrock Road
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Corwin Road - State Route 18
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 9:00
52 1 1 52 X X 2
51 0 3 51 X X X 3 Time
50 2 0 50 X X 2 To: 11:20
49 1 0 49 X 1
48 3 0 48 X X X 3 Existing
47 0 1 47 X 1 Speed Limit: 35 MPH
46 3 0 46 X X X 3
45 0 0 45 0
44 2 4 44 X X X X X X 6 *
43 2 1 43 X X X 3 *
42 6 2 42 X X X X X X X X 8 *
41 3 2 41 X X X X X 5 P Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 5 2 40 X X X X X X X 7 A % Over Pace: 20% 10% 15%
39 2 3 39 X X X X X 5 C
38 6 7 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 E % In Pace: 66% 70% 68% 37 3 4 37 X X X X X X X 7 *
36 1 7 36 X X X X X X X X 8 * % Under Pace: 14% 20% 17% 35 3 3 35 X X X X X X 6 *
34 2 0 34 X X 2 Average Speed: 40 MPH 38 MPH 39 MPH
33 2 2 33 X X X X 4
32 0 1 32 X 1 Pace Speed: 35 - 44 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 31 1 1 31 X X 2
30 0 2 30 X X 2
29 1 0 29 X 1 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 35 MPH 32 MPH 33 MPH 28 1 2 28 X X X 3
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 38 MPH 38 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 1 25 X 1 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 44 MPH 44 MPH 24 0 1 24 X 1
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
Town of Apple Valley
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
5/18/22

MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Nokomis Road
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Symeron Road - Riverside Drive
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 9:00
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0 Time
50 0 0 50 0 To: 11:30
49 0 0 49 0
48 1 0 48 X 1 Existing
47 0 0 47 0 Speed Limit: 35 MPH
46 1 1 46 X X 2
45 3 2 45 X X X X X 5
44 1 2 44 X X X 3
43 1 0 43 X 1
42 2 2 42 X X X X 4
41 1 0 41 X 1 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 0 0 40 0 % Over Pace: 20% 14% 17%
39 5 3 39 X X X X X X X X 8 *
38 3 6 38 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % In Pace: 70% 70% 70%
37 6 3 37 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
36 2 3 36 X X X X X 5 P % Under Pace: 10% 16% 13%
35 5 4 35 X X X X X X X X X 9 A
34 2 3 34 X X X X X 5 C Average Speed: 36 MPH 35 MPH 35 MPH 33 3 3 33 X X X X X X 6 E
32 3 3 32 X X X X X X 6 * Pace Speed: 30 - 39 MPH 30 - 39 MPH 30 - 39 MPH 31 3 4 31 X X X X X X X 7 *
30 3 3 30 X X X X X X 6 *
29 1 3 29 X X X X 4 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 30 MPH 29 MPH 30 MPH 28 0 4 28 X X X X 4
27 1 0 27 X 1 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 36 MPH 35 MPH 35 MPH 26 1 0 26 X 1
25 2 0 25 X X 2 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 39 MPH 42 MPH 24 0 1 24 X 1
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
Town of Apple Valley
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
5/13/22

MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Ottawa Road
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Navajo Road - Central Road
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 1 0 55 X 1
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 1 2 53 X X X 3 From: 2:15
52 2 0 52 X X 2
51 0 0 51 0 Time
50 0 0 50 0 To: 3:00
49 2 1 49 X X X 3
48 1 0 48 X 1 Existing
47 1 1 47 X X 2 Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 1 2 46 X X X 3
45 5 0 45 X X X X X 5
44 2 0 44 X X 2
43 1 2 43 X X X 3
42 1 2 42 X X X 3
41 2 4 41 X X X X X X 6 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 3 2 40 X X X X X 5 * % Over Pace: 16% 16% 28%
39 6 5 39 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
38 3 6 38 X X X X X X X X X 9 P % In Pace: 56% 66% 61%
37 4 2 37 X X X X X X 6 A
36 0 4 36 X X X X 4 C % Under Pace: 28% 18% 11%
35 2 3 35 X X X X X 5 E
34 4 1 34 X X X X X 5 * Average Speed: 40 MPH 38 MPH 39 MPH 33 2 4 33 X X X X X X 6 *
32 2 2 32 X X X X 4 * Pace Speed: 37 - 46 MPH 33 - 42 MPH 32 - 41 MPH 31 1 2 31 X X X 3
30 1 1 30 X X 2
29 1 1 29 X X 2 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 33 MPH 32 MPH 32 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 1 0 27 X 1 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 38 MPH 38 MPH 26 0 2 26 X X 2
25 0 1 25 X 1 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 43 MPH 45 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
Town of Apple Valley
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
5/13/22

MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Seneca Road
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Apple Valley Road - Riverside Drive 62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 1:30
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0 Time
50 1 1 50 X X 2 To: 1:50
49 1 1 49 X X 2
48 0 1 48 X 1 Existing
47 3 1 47 X X X X 4 Speed Limit: 35 MPH
46 1 1 46 X X 2
45 4 3 45 X X X X X X X 7
44 1 2 44 X X X 3
43 3 1 43 X X X X 4
42 1 2 42 X X X 3
41 3 4 41 X X X X X X X 7 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 2 2 40 X X X X 4 * % Over Pace: 22% 26% 28%
39 5 4 39 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
38 6 4 38 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P % In Pace: 60% 64% 61% 37 2 2 37 X X X X 4 A
36 1 7 36 X X X X X X X X 8 C % Under Pace: 18% 10% 11% 35 0 0 35 0 E
34 7 4 34 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 * Average Speed: 38 MPH 38 MPH 38 MPH 33 1 2 33 X X X 3 *
32 2 3 32 X X X X X 5 * Pace Speed: 34 - 43 MPH 32 - 41 MPH 32 - 41 MPH 31 2 1 31 X X X 3
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 32 MPH 32 MPH 32 MPH 28 1 0 28 X 1
27 1 2 27 X X X 3 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 38 MPH 38 MPH 38 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 2 25 X X 2 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 45 MPH 45 MPH 24 2 0 24 X X 2
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
Town of Apple Valley
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
5/11/22

MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Symeron Road
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Apple Valley Road - Riverside Drive 52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 0 46 0
45 0 1 45 X 1
44 1 0 44 X 1 Time
43 1 2 43 X X X 3 From: 9:35
42 1 2 42 X X X 3
41 2 1 41 X X X 3 Time
40 1 2 40 X X X 3 To: 10:15
39 1 2 39 X X X 3
38 1 1 38 X X 2 Existing
37 0 1 37 X 1 Speed Limit: 35 MPH
36 2 3 36 X X X X X 5 *
35 6 3 35 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
34 4 3 34 X X X X X X X 7 *
33 5 4 33 X X X X X X X X X 9 P
32 5 6 32 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A
31 3 3 31 X X X X X X 6 C Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 3 5 30 X X X X X X X X 8 E % Over Pace: 16% 22% 20%
29 1 2 29 X X X 3 *
28 4 7 28 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 * % In Pace: 76% 74% 75% 27 5 1 27 X X X X X X 6 *
26 2 1 26 X X X 3 % Under Pace: 8% 4% 5%
25 2 0 25 X X 2
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 33 MPH 34 MPH 33 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 27 - 36 MPH 28 - 37 MPH 27 - 36 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 27 MPH 28 MPH 28 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 32 MPH 32 MPH 32 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 38 MPH 40 MPH 39 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
Town of Apple Valley
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
5/10/22

MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Tonikan Road
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Ramona Avenue - Thunderbird Road
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 0 46 0
45 0 0 45 0
44 0 1 44 X 1 Time
43 0 0 43 0 From: 9:00
42 0 0 42 0
41 1 0 41 X 1 Time
40 0 0 40 0 To: 11:15
39 2 1 39 X X X 3
38 2 1 38 X X X 3 Existing
37 2 1 37 X X X 3 Speed Limit: N/P MPH
36 0 1 36 X 1
35 1 2 35 X X X 3
34 0 2 34 X X 2 *
33 1 1 33 X X 2 *
32 3 2 32 X X X X X 5 *
31 2 2 31 X X X X 4 P Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 30 1 2 30 X X X 3 A % Over Pace: 32% 12% 30%
29 0 2 29 X X 2 C
28 1 2 28 X X X 3 E % In Pace: 68% 68% 64%
27 4 1 27 X X X X X 5 *
26 1 1 26 X X 2 * % Under Pace: 0% 20% 6%
25 3 1 25 X X X X 4 *
24 1 0 24 X 1 Average Speed: 31 MPH 31 MPH 31 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 24 - 33 MPH 28 - 37 MPH 25 - 34 MPH 21 0 1 21 X 1
20 0 1 20 X 1
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 25 MPH 26 MPH 26 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 31 MPH 31 MPH 31 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 38 MPH 37 MPH 38 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 25 25 GRAND TOTALS 50
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
Town of Apple Valley
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
5/19/22

MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Waalew Road
75 0 0 75 0
74 0 0 74 0
73 0 0 73 0 Between: Corwin Road - Dale Evens Parkway
72 0 0 72 0
71 0 0 71 0
70 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69 0
68 0 0 68 0
67 0 0 67 0 Date:
66 0 1 66 X 1
65 2 0 65 X X 2
64 0 1 64 X 1 Time
63 0 3 63 X X X 3 From: 2:30
62 1 0 62 X 1
61 1 1 61 X X 2 Time
60 0 0 60 0 To: 2:55
59 0 0 59 0
58 1 2 58 X X X 3 Existing
57 2 1 57 X X X 3 * Speed Limit: 55 MPH
56 2 2 56 X X X X 4 *
55 5 1 55 X X X X X X 6 *
54 7 6 54 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 P
53 3 1 53 X X X X 4 A
52 1 2 52 X X X 3 C
51 5 4 51 X X X X X X X X X 9 E Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 50 4 1 50 X X X X X 5 * % Over Pace: 8% 16% 13%
49 2 2 49 X X X X 4 *
48 1 5 48 X X X X X X 6 * % In Pace: 64% 50% 57%
47 1 1 47 X X 2
46 3 1 46 X X X X 4 % Under Pace: 28% 34% 30%
45 0 2 45 X X 2
44 7 3 44 X X X X X X X X X X 10 Average Speed: 52 MPH 50 MPH 51 MPH 43 2 1 43 X X X 3
42 0 1 42 X 1 Pace Speed: 49 - 58 MPH 48 - 57 MPH 48 - 57 MPH 41 0 4 41 X X X X 4
40 0 3 40 X X X 3
39 0 0 39 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 41 MPH 44 MPH 38 0 1 38 X 1
37 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 51 MPH 50 MPH 51 MPH 36 0 0 36 0
35 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 56 MPH 58 MPH 57 MPH 34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0
31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
Town of Apple Valley
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
5/19/22

MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Yucca Loma Road
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Apple Valley Road - Rincon Road
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 1 0 56 X 1
55 1 0 55 X 1
54 0 1 54 X 1 Time
53 3 2 53 X X X X X 5 From: 2:10
52 2 0 52 X X 2
51 3 3 51 X X X X X X 6 * Time
50 5 1 50 X X X X X X 6 * To: 2:30
49 3 4 49 X X X X X X X 7 *
48 5 6 48 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P Existing
47 4 5 47 X X X X X X X X X 9 A Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 3 4 46 X X X X X X X 7 C
45 4 5 45 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
44 4 7 44 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
43 4 3 43 X X X X X X X 7 *
42 3 5 42 X X X X X X X X 8 *
41 4 2 41 X X X X X X 6 Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 0 0 40 0 % Over Pace: 20% 6% 10%
39 1 0 39 X 1
38 0 1 38 X 1 % In Pace: 78% 86% 81%
37 0 1 37 X 1
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 2% 8% 9%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 47 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 41 - 50 MPH 42 - 51 MPH 42 - 51 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 51 MPH 49 MPH 51 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
Town of Apple Valley
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
5/10/22

MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Yucca Loma Road
75 0 0 75 0
74 0 0 74 0
73 0 0 73 0 Between: Rincon Road - Kiowa Road
72 0 0 72 0
71 0 0 71 0
70 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69 0
68 0 0 68 0
67 0 0 67 0 Date:
66 0 0 66 0
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0 Time
63 0 0 63 0 From: 1:50
62 1 0 62 X 1
61 0 0 61 0 Time
60 0 0 60 0 To: 2:10
59 1 0 59 X 1
58 2 0 58 X X 2 Existing
57 0 2 57 X X 2 Speed Limit: 45 MPH
56 1 1 56 X X 2
55 3 1 55 X X X X 4
54 1 2 54 X X X 3
53 2 1 53 X X X 3
52 3 2 52 X X X X X 5 *
51 5 7 51 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 50 5 2 50 X X X X X X X 7 * % Over Pace: 22% 14% 18%
49 3 2 49 X X X X X 5 P
48 3 7 48 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A % In Pace: 70% 74% 72% 47 2 4 47 X X X X X X 6 C
46 6 5 46 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E % Under Pace: 8% 12% 10% 45 2 1 45 X X X 3 *
44 3 4 44 X X X X X X X 7 * Average Speed: 49 MPH 48 MPH 48 MPH 43 3 3 43 X X X X X X 6 *
42 1 0 42 X 1 Pace Speed: 43 - 52 MPH 43 - 52 MPH 43 - 52 MPH 41 2 2 41 X X X X 4
40 1 0 40 X 1
39 0 3 39 X X X 3 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH 38 0 1 38 X 1
37 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 49 MPH 48 MPH 48 MPH 36 0 0 36 0
35 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 55 MPH 52 MPH 53 MPH 34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0
31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
Town of Apple Valley
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
5/10/22

Appendix F
Radar Certifications

Appendix G
FHWA Roadway Classification Map

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
In Cooperation With The

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
AND LOCAL AGENCIES Ü
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1
Mile SIGN ROUTES

INTERSTATE
£¤3 U.S.
|ÿ
1 STATE
COUNTY BOUNDARY §¨¦5

CITY BOUNDARY

RAILROAD
SAN

BERNARDINO
SEE MAP 15T
SEE MAP 15T54
SEE MAP 15T52
SEE MAP 15U13
!(

BELL MOUNTAIN
SAN

BERNARDINO
!"#15
Cardova Rd
Johnson Rd
Dale Evans Pkwy
Stoddard Wells Rd
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
J
J
I
I
H
H
G
G
F
F
E
E
D
D
C
C
B
B
A
A
San Bernardino County

APPROVED

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
________________________________
FOR: VINCENT P. MAMMANO

DIVISION ADMINISTRATOR
Date: 01/28/2022
LOCAL 7
MINOR COLLECTOR 6
MAJOR COLLECTOR 5
MINOR ARTERIAL 4
OTHER PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL 3
OTHER FWY OR EXPWY 2
INTERSTATE 1

FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
MAP 15T53

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
In Cooperation With The

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
AND LOCAL AGENCIES Ü
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1
Mile SIGN ROUTES

INTERSTATE
£¤3 U.S.
|ÿ
1 STATE
COUNTY BOUNDARY §¨¦5

CITY BOUNDARY

RAILROAD
SAN

BERNARDINO
SEE MAP 15T
SEE MAP 15T
SEE MAP 15T53
SEE MAP 15U14
SAN

BERNARDINO
Cardova
Rd
Somis Ave
Dachshund Ave
Navajo Rd
Lafayette St
N
a
v
a
j
o
R
d
Johnson Rd
Stoddard Wells Rd
C
e
n
t
r
al R
d
Stoddard Wells Rd
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
J
J
I
I
H
H
G
G
F
F
E
E
D
D
C
C
B
B
A
A
San Bernardino County

APPROVED

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
________________________________
FOR: VINCENT P. MAMMANO

DIVISION ADMINISTRATOR
Date: 01/28/2022
LOCAL 7
MINOR COLLECTOR 6
MAJOR COLLECTOR 5
MINOR ARTERIAL 4
OTHER PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL 3
OTHER FWY OR EXPWY 2
INTERSTATE 1

FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
MAP 15T54

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
In Cooperation With The

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
AND LOCAL AGENCIES Ü
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1
Mile SIGN ROUTES

INTERSTATE
£¤3 U.S.
|ÿ
1 STATE
COUNTY BOUNDARY §¨¦5

CITY BOUNDARY

RAILROAD

SAN BERNARDINO
SEE MAP 15T53
SEE MAP 15U14
SEE MAP 15U12
SEE MAP 15U23
!(

VICTORVILLE
SAN

BERNARDINO
|}18
!"#15
M
o
n
d
a
m
on
R
d
Apple
Valley Rd
N D St
Kiowa Rd
Victor St
Avalon
Ave
Ridgecrest
Rd
Chippewa Rd
Wika Rd
Green
Tree Blvd
Abbey Ln
Choco Rd
Spring
Va
l
l
ey
Pkwy
Mojave Dr
Seneca Rd
M
a
n
dan
Rd
Po
h
e
z
R
d
6Th St
B St
Tao Rd
Blackfoot Rd
Falchion Rd
7Th St
Standing Rock Ave
Pine Ridge Ave
Symeron Rd
Zuni Rd
Choco Rd
Flathead Rd
Waalew Rd
C
r
o
n
e
s
e
Rd
Tomahawk Rd
Rimrock Rd
Yates Rd
Otoe Rd
Outer Hwy 18 S
Thunderbird Rd
Rincon Rd
Dale Evans Pkwy
Dale Evans Pkwy
Apple Valley Rd
Outer Hwy 18 N
Riverside Dr
Outer Hwy 18 N
Mandan Rd
Seneca Rd
Shoshonee Rd
Hesperia
Rd
Outer Hwy 18 S
Yucca Loma Rd
Stoddard Wells Rd
Corwin Rd
Rancherias Rd
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
J
J
I
I
H
H
G
G
F
F
E
E
D
D
C
C
B
B
A
A
San Bernardino County

APPROVED

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
________________________________
FOR: VINCENT P. MAMMANO

DIVISION ADMINISTRATOR
Date: 01/28/2022
LOCAL 7
MINOR COLLECTOR 6
MAJOR COLLECTOR 5
MINOR ARTERIAL 4
OTHER PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL 3
OTHER FWY OR EXPWY 2
INTERSTATE 1

FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
MAP 15U13

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
In Cooperation With The

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
AND LOCAL AGENCIES Ü
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1
Mile SIGN ROUTES

INTERSTATE
£¤3 U.S.
|ÿ
1 STATE
COUNTY BOUNDARY §¨¦5

CITY BOUNDARY

RAILROAD

SAN BERNARDINO
SEE MAP 15T54
SEE MAP 15U15
SEE MAP 15U13
SEE MAP 15U24
!(
APPLE
VALLEY

APPLE VALLEY
SAN

BERNARDINO
|}18
Nanticoke
Rd
Hanford Rd
Fresno Rd
R
a
m
o
n
a
R
d
Gustine
St
Somis Ave
Headquarters Dr
Flathead
Rd
Rancherias Rd
Corwin Rd Dakota Rd
Navajo Rd
Elkalo Rd
Mesquite Rd
Yucca Loma Rd
Waalew Rd
Outer Hwy 18 S
Kiowa Rd
Corwin Rd
Pine Ridge Ave
Ocotilla Rd
Outer Highway 18 S
Cahuilla Rd
Standing Rock Ave
Outer Hwy 18 N
Otoe Rd
Laguna Seca Dr
Navajo Rd
South Rd
Ramona Ave
Thunderbird Rd
Standing Rock Ave
Joshua Rd
Central Rd
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
J
J
I
I
H
H
G
G
F
F
E
E
D
D
C
C
B
B
A
A
San Bernardino County

APPROVED

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
________________________________
FOR: VINCENT P. MAMMANO

DIVISION ADMINISTRATOR
Date: 01/28/2022
LOCAL 7
MINOR COLLECTOR 6
MAJOR COLLECTOR 5
MINOR ARTERIAL 4
OTHER PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL 3
OTHER FWY OR EXPWY 2
INTERSTATE 1

FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
MAP 15U14

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
In Cooperation With The

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
AND LOCAL AGENCIES Ü
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1
Mile SIGN ROUTES

INTERSTATE
£¤3 U.S.
|ÿ
1 STATE
COUNTY BOUNDARY §¨¦5

CITY BOUNDARY

RAILROAD

SAN BERNARDINO
SEE MAP 15U13
SEE MAP 15U24
SEE MAP 15U22
SEE MAP 15U33
!(
!(
THORN

HESPERIA
SAN

BERNARDINO
Kiowa Rd
Green Tree
Blvd
Santa Fe
Ave E
Willow
St
Van Dusen Rd
Mauna
Loa St
Carob St
Mesa St
Pah Ute Rd
Nisqualli Rd
C Ave
Roundup Way
Ottawa Rd
Silica Dr
Sycamore St
Jasmine St
Industrial Blvd
2Nd Ave
Winona St
S
p
r
i
n
g
Va
l
el
y
P
kw
y
Rock Springs Rd
Reata Rd
Main St
E Ave
Ottawa St
Rincon Rd
1St Ave
Eucalyptus St
Lemon St
Jacaranda Ave
Tussing Ranch Rd
Orchid Ave
D
e
e
p
C
r
e
e
k
R
d
Choiceana Ave
Ridgecrest Rd
Apple Valley Rd
Del Oro Rd
Deep Creek Rd
Live Oak St
Sitting Bull Rd
Santa Fe Ave E
I Ave
Peach Ave
Hesperia Rd
Bear Valley Rd
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
J
J
I
I
H
H
G
G
F
F
E
E
D
D
C
C
B
B
A
A
San Bernardino County

APPROVED

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
________________________________
FOR: VINCENT P. MAMMANO

DIVISION ADMINISTRATOR
Date: 01/28/2022
LOCAL 7
MINOR COLLECTOR 6
MAJOR COLLECTOR 5
MINOR ARTERIAL 4
OTHER PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL 3
OTHER FWY OR EXPWY 2
INTERSTATE 1

FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
MAP 15U23

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
In Cooperation With The

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
AND LOCAL AGENCIES Ü
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1
Mile SIGN ROUTES

INTERSTATE
£¤3 U.S.
|ÿ
1 STATE
COUNTY BOUNDARY §¨¦5

CITY BOUNDARY

RAILROAD

SAN BERNARDINO
SEE MAP 15U14
SEE MAP 15U25
SEE MAP 15U23
SEE MAP 15U34
!(

COTNERS
CORNER
SAN

BERNARDINO
|}18
Quinnault
Rd
Central Rd
Desert
View Rd
Central Rd
Nisqually Rd
Pah Ute Rd
Dennison Rd
Sitting Bull Rd
Roundup Way
Del Oro Rd
Nisqually Rd
Pah Ute Rd
Joshua Rd
Tussing Ranch Rd
Bear Valley Rd Mesquite Rd
Joshua Rd
Navajo Rd
Milpas Dr
Valley Vista Ave
Wren St
Roundup Way
Ottawa Rd
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
J
J
I
I
H
H
G
G
F
F
E
E
D
D
C
C
B
B
A
A
San Bernardino County

APPROVED

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
________________________________
FOR: VINCENT P. MAMMANO

DIVISION ADMINISTRATOR
Date: 01/28/2022
LOCAL 7
MINOR COLLECTOR 6
MAJOR COLLECTOR 5
MINOR ARTERIAL 4
OTHER PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL 3
OTHER FWY OR EXPWY 2
INTERSTATE 1

FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
MAP 15U24

Appendix H
Caltrans District 8 - 2019 Crash Data

Crash Summary - Overall Summary by District
FOR 2019 PREPARED 10/19/2021
TRAVEL AND CRASH SUMMARY FOR DISTRICT 08

LANE TYPE ROAD TRAVEL CRASHES VICTIMS

MILES (MVM) TOTAL PDO INJURY FATAL KILLED INJURED
RATES
ACC/MVM F+I/MVM

FATALITIES
/100 MVM

RURAL AREAS
678.6 1,103.3 1,010 567 419 24 25 641

4.0 16.5 38 22 14 2 2 19 2 AND 3 LN
4+ UND 49.8 342.1 262 149 103 10 11 154

0.92 0.40

2.30 0.97

0.77 0.33

2.27 12.09

3.22 4+ DIV 732.5 1,462.0 1,310 738 536 36 38 814 0.90 0.39 2.60

SUBTOTAL
2 AND 3 LN EXP

36.4 44.4

96.1 293.0
99 205
48 120
48 80
3 5
3 5
64 117

1.03 0.70

0.53 0.29

3.12 1.71
4+ DIV EXP 813.3 1,851.1 1,614 906 664 44 46 995 0.87 0.38 2.48 NON FWY 413.2 6,008.2 3,180 2,193 927 60 70 1,495 0.53 0.16 1.17 FREEWAY 1,226.5 7,859.3 4,794 3,099 1,591 104 116 2,490 0.61 0.22 1.48 TOTAL

URBAN AREAS
128.7 445.7 481 245 228 8 9 322

15.5 142.3 123 58 59 6 8 108 2 AND 3 LN
4+ UND 74.2 660.4 876 381 480 15 18 735

1.08 0.53

0.86 0.46

1.33 0.75

2.02 5.62

2.73 4+ DIV 218.4 1,248.4 1,480 684 767 29 35 1,165 1.19 0.64 2.80

SUBTOTAL
2 AND 3 LN EXP

13.9 19.2

79.3 255.7
105
166
73 97
31 68
1 1
1 1
61 110

1.32 0.65

0.40 0.27

1.26 0.39
4+ DIV EXP 251.5 1,583.4 1,751 854 866 31 37 1,336 1.11 0.57 2.34 NON FWY 337.9 17,253.0 16,380 11,125 5,161 94 94 7,427 0.95 0.30 0.54 FREEWAY 589.4 18,836.4 18,131 11,979 6,027 125 131 8,763 0.96 0.33 0.70 TOTAL

DISTRICTWIDE
807.4 1,549.1 1,491 812 647 32 34 963

19.5 158.9 161 80 73 8 10 127 2 AND 3 LN
4+ UND 124.0 1,002.5 1,138 530 583 25 29 889

0.96 0.44

1.01 0.51

1.14 0.61

2.19 6.29

2.89 4+ DIV 950.9 2,710.4 2,790 1,422 1,303 65 73 1,979 1.03 0.50 2.69

SUBTOTAL
2 AND 3 LN EXP

50.3 63.6
175.4
548.7
204
371
121
217
79 148
4 6
4 6
125
227

1.16 0.68

0.47 0.28

2.28 1.09
4+ DIV EXP 1,064.8 3,434.6 3,365 1,760 1,530 75 83 2,331 0.98 0.47 2.42 NON FWY 751.1 23,261.2 19,560 13,318 6,088 154 164 8,922 0.84 0.27 0.71 FREEWAY 1,815.9 26,695.7 22,925 15,078 7,618 229 247 11,253 0.86 0.29 0.93 TOTAL
20

Statewide Travel / Crash Summary
FOR 2019 PREPARED 10/19/2021

TRAVEL AND CRASH SUMMARY FOR SB COUNTY
LANE
ROAD
MILES
TRAVEL
(MVM) TOTAL

CRASHES

PDO INJURY FATAL

VICTIMS

KILLED INJURED

RUTRYAPEL
2 AND 3 LN
4+ UND

59.1 2.6

4.8 129.7

6.8 31.3
146
9 22
100 43
5 4
15 7
3 0
0 3 64
0 4
0 9
4+ DIV 66.5 167.9 177 120 54 3 3 77

SUBTOTAL
2 AND 3 LN EXP

47.1 51.6
125.6
462.1
86 331
52 236
31 91
3 4
5 5
49 161
4+ DIV EXP 165.1 755.6 594 408 176 10 13 287
NON FWY 10.6 114.2 44 27 16 1 1 20
FREEWAY 175.7 869.8 638 435 192 11 14 307
TOTAL
URBAN
2 AND 3 LN
4+ UND

41.4 6.7

17.7 132.4

37.1 129.5
112
63 326
58 50
45 18
211 114
4 0
1 4 74
0 22
1 149
4+ DIV 65.7 299.0 501 314 182 5 5 245

SUBTOTAL
2 AND 3 LN EXP

8.5 4.1

29.5 36.0
31 29
18 24
12 5
1 0
1 0
18 9
4+ DIV EXP 78.3 364.6 561 356 199 6 6 272
NON FWY 40.0 1,039.1 1,002 710 285 7 8 412
FREEWAY 118.3 1,403.7 1,563 1,066 484 13 14 684
TOTAL

COUNTYWIDE
2 AND 3 LN
4+ UND
100.4

9.3 22.5
262.2

43.9 160.8
258
72 348
158 93
50 22
226 121
7 0
1 7 138
0 26
1 158
4+ DIV 132.2 466.9 678 434 236 8 8 322

SUBTOTAL
2 AND 3 LN EXP

55.6 55.7
155.2
498.1
117
360
70 260
43 96
4 4
6 5
67 170
4+ DIV EXP 243.5 1,120.2 1,155 764 375 16 19 559
NON FWY 50.6 1,153.3 1,046 737 301 8 9 432
FREEWAY 294.0 2,273.5 2,201 1,501 676 24 28 991
TOTAL
59

Town Council Agenda Report
Date: October 25, 2022
To: Honorable Mayor and Town Council
Subject: ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE 560 – AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN

COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA,
ADOPTING ZONE CHANGE NO. 2021-001 AND SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2021-001 FOR THE VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN

From: Douglas Robertson, Town Manager
Submitted by: Daniel Acayaga, AICP, Planning Manager
Planning
Budgeted Item: Yes No N/A

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adopt Ordinance No. 560.

BACKGROUND
At its October 11, 2022 meeting, the Town Council reviewed and introduced Ordinance 560 that adopts the Village Specific Plan and accompanying Zone Change. The Town Council also adopted environmental findings and a statement of overriding considerations, certified the Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2021110271), and adopted a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Village Specific Plan.

The Village Specific Plan is intended to guide the long-term development and redevelopment of a 1.5±-mile segment of Highway 18, including the Village commercial area, and parcels generally bounded by Arapahoe and Esaws Avenues on the north and Ottawa Road on the south, Central Road on the east, and the realigned Yucca Loma and Navajo Road on the west. It revises land use designations and sets forth development guidelines in the context of five (5) planning Districts to enhance the Village’s identity as a downtown retail destination, guide future development of vacant parcels and redevelopment of underutilized parcels, and protect and expand residential neighborhoods with guidelines that scale down development at the periphery of the Village. Proposed circulation improvements to Highway 18 and Yucca Loma Road/Navajo Road are intended to minimize traffic conflicts, integrate multimodal facilities, and improve access and safety throughout the area.

The Ordinance is now ready for adoption. The environmental impacts associated with the Ordinance adoption are evaluated in the aforementioned environmental documents approved by the Town Council on October 11, 2022.

FISCAL IMPACT
Not applicable.

ATTACHMENTS
A. Ordinance 560
B. Village Specific Plan (Exhibit “A”) (Provided under a separate attachment, available from the Town Clerks Office and online at www.applevalley.org)

ORDINANCE NO. 560

AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA,
ADOPTING ZONE CHANGE NO. 2021-001 AND SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2021-001 FOR THE VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN
WHEREAS, The General Plan of the Town of Apple Valley was adopted by the Town Council on August 11, 2009; and
WHEREAS, The Village Specific Plan is intended to guide the long-term development and redevelopment of a 1.5±-mile segment of Highway 18, including the Village commercial area, and parcels generally bounded by Arapahoe and Esaws Avenues on the north and Ottawa Road on the south, Central Road on the east, and the realigned Yucca Loma and Navajo Road on the west. It revises land use designations and sets forth development guidelines in the context of five (5) planning Districts to enhance the Village’s identity as a downtown retail destination, guide future development of vacant parcels and redevelopment of underutilized parcels, and protect and expand residential neighborhoods with guidelines that scale down development at the periphery of the Village. Proposed circulation improvements to Highway 18 and Yucca Loma Road/Navajo Road are intended to minimize traffic conflicts, integrate multimodal facilities, and improve access and safety throughout the area; and WHEREAS, The overall objectives of the Specific Plan are to:
 Create a vibrant neighborhood that will stand the test of time.  Expand the identity of the Village from Highway 18 throughout the Village boundary.
 Have a creative, cohesive and harmonious look and feel, with inviting streetscapes and attractive building façades.
 Enhance connectivity and access throughout the Village.  Create a sense of place with interesting public spaces and paseos to increase walkability.
 Be a convenient place for locals and visitors to stop, shop, and do business.  Be a safe and comfortable place for pedestrians, cyclists, and motorists.  Attract an eclectic mix of retail, services, specialty shops, and restaurants.  Strengthen partnerships between the Town, the PBID and business and property owners to fund and implement improvements.

WHEREAS, Zone Change No. 2021-001 and Specific Plan No. 2021-001 are consistent with the General Plan of the Town of Apple Valley; and WHEREAS, On May 18, 2022 and June 15, 2022, the Planning Commission of the Town of Apple Valley conducted a duly noticed and advertised public hearing, and adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 2022-003 recommending adoption of this Resolution; an
WHEREAS, on October 11, 2022, the Town Council of the Town of Apple Valley

Ordinance No. 560
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on Zone Change No. 2021-001 and Specific Plan No. 2021-001, receiving testimony from the public and adopted this Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, Zone Change No. 2021-001 and Specific Plan No. 2021-001 are consistent with the Land Use Element goals and policies of the Town’s General Plan and Title 9 “Development Code” of the Municipal Code of the Town of Apple Valley and shall promote the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of the Town of Apple Valley; and
WHEREAS, on October 1, 2022, Zone Change No. 2021-001 and Specific Plan No. 2021-001 was duly noticed in the Victor Valley Daily Press, a newspaper of general circulation within the Town of Apple Valley; and
WHEREAS, The Town of Apple Valley, as lead agency, determined that an Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) should be prepared pursuant to CEQA in order to analyze all adverse environmental impacts of the Project; and WHEREAS, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission recommends that the Town Council certify said Environmental Impact Report based on the following findings and that the Town Council also make the following findings:

1. That the Environmental Impact Report has been prepared and processed in compliance with the State CEQA Guidelines and the Town’s implementation procedures. The Town Council has independently reviewed and considered the information contained in the Environmental Impact Report, and finds that it adequately describes and addresses the environmental effects of the Project. The mitigation measures identified in the Environmental Impact Report have been incorporated into the Project and/or will be made part of the approval of the project and these measures will mitigate most potential significant effects. Impacts associated with greenhouse gas emissions cannot be fully mitigated; therefore, the Town Council adopts a Statement of Overriding Considerations.

2. The Project will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community, either indirectly, or directly, in that most impacts can be mitigated to less than significant levels. Impacts associated with greenhouse gas emissions cannot be fully mitigated; therefore, a Statement of Overriding Considerations will be prepared.

3. The Project will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number, or restrict the range of, rare or endangered plants or animals or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history, or prehistory.

Ordinance No. 560

4. There is no evidence before the Town that the Project will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat on which the wildlife depends.

5. The Project does not have the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals, as the project is consistent with the General Plan, and impacts to all environmental factors except greenhouse gas emissions have been reduced to less than significant levels; therefore, a Statement of Overriding Considerations will be prepared.

6. The Project will not result in impacts which are individually limited or cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed development in the immediate vicinity, as development patterns in the area will not be significantly affected by the Project.

7. The Project will not have the environmental effects that will adversely affect the human population, either directly or indirectly, as no significant impacts have been identified which would affect human health, risk potential or public services.

8. The Town Council has fully considered the Environmental Impact Report and the administrative record relating to the proposed project.

9. The Environmental Impact Report reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission.

10. The Town Council finds the Town has not received any evidence of new significant impacts, as defined by State CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5, after circulation of the EIR which would require recirculation. No substantial changes to the Village Specific Plan have occurred that would require a subsequent or supplemental EIR.

11. The location of the documents which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Town Council is based upon is in the Town of Apple Valley Town Hall, Community Development Department, 14955 Dale Evans Parkway Apple Valley, California 92307.

12. A copy of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) is included in the Environmental Impact Report pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 in order to assure compliance with the mitigation measures during Project implementation. To the extent there is any conflict between the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, the EIR, or the Findings of Fact, the terms and provisions of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program shall control.

13. Based upon the Environmental Impact Report and the entire record of proceedings, the Project has no potential for adverse effects on wildlife as that term is defined in Fish and Game Code Section 711.2.

Ordinance No. 560

14. The Town Council has on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of adverse effect set forth in 14 California Code of Regulations 753.5(d); and
WHEREAS, on October 11, 2022, the Town Council of the Town of Apple Valley conducted a duly noticed public hearing pertaining to the Village Specific Plan, and concluded said hearing on October 11, 2022; and
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Town Council of the Town of Apple Valley, State of California does Ordain as follows, that in consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing, and for the reasons discussed by the Town Council at said hearing, the Town Council of the Town of Apple Valley, California, finds and determines as follows and the Town Council makes the following findings and take the following actions:

Section 1. The recitals above are true and correct and are hereby incorporated herein by this reference.

Section 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced October 11, 2022, hearings, including public testimony and written and oral staff reports, this Town Council specifically finds as follows:

A. The following are the Findings for an amendment to the Development Code, through a Zone Change, as required under Section 9.06.060:

1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan.

The proposed Zone Change was clearly identified as a long-term goal in the General Plan, as envisioned in General Plan Land Use Goal Nos. LU-5 & LU-6, as well as Policies Nos. 5E and 6C, and Programs Nos. 6.C.1, 6.C.2, 6.C.3. The Amendment will assure the long-term, planned growth and redevelopment of the Village with high-quality residential, mixed use, and commercial development. The Village Specific Plan extends and enhances development standards already in place within the current Development Code.

2. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare of the Town or its residents.

The proposed Zone Change will assure the master planned, high quality development of both land uses and infrastructure of sufficient size to accommodate the development and surrounding land uses for the long term.

Ordinance No. 560
B. Development Code Section 9.03.050 requires that the following Findings be made in order to approve a Specific Plan:

1. The proposed Specific Plan meets all of the following content criteria, with a comment to address each:
a. Specifies through text and/or diagrams, the distribution, location and extent of the uses of land, including open space, within the area covered by the plan;
The proposed Specific Plan details land-use designations, permitted and conditionally permitted uses, and development standards to assure cohesive development within the Specific Plan area. b. Specifies through text and/or diagrams, the proposed distribution, location and extent and intensity of major components of public and private transportation, sewage, water, drainage, solidwaste disposal, energy and other essential facilities proposed to be located within the area covered by the plan and needed to support the land uses described in the plan;
Chapter 5 of the Specific Plan details both existing and required future infrastructure improvements required to assure master planned, high quality development in the Specific Plan area. All infrastructure has been sized to accommodate full build-out of the Specific Plan.
c. Specifies through text and/or diagrams, the standards and criteria by which development will proceed, and standards for the conservation, development and utilization of natural resources, where applicable;
The development standards included in the Specific Plan include text, tables and graphic representations of the requirements for development.
d. Specifies a program of implementation measures, including regulations, programs, public works projects, and financing measures necessary to carry out Findings 1.a, 1.b, and 1.c above; Chapters 5 and 6 of the Specific Plan discusses improvements required and the potential financing of these improvements. The Specific Plan describes existing infrastructure and sets forth the backbone infrastructure required for the build-out of the Specific Plan area. In addition to this backbone infrastructure, individual projects will be required to extend infrastructure to their properties and assure

Ordinance No. 560
connection to water, sanitary sewer, roads and drainage improvements for a uniform and master planned project.
e. The Village Specific Plan is consistent with General Plan Land Use Element Policies 3.B, 4.I, 4.J and 4.K, as described below:
i. The Village Specific Plan is consistent with Policy 3.B. in that a Specific Plan is required when development
proposals propose a combination of land uses or variations of development standards in a particular zone.
ii. The Village Specific Plan does not propose singlefamily residential development and is therefore not subject to the density, lot sizes, and recreational and open space criteria established in Policies 4.I, 4.J and 4.K.
iii. The types of new residential development envisioned in the Village Specific Plan are multi-family residential or mixed-use development. Both types of development will be allowed in either an area already zoned for multi-family residential zone or within an existing in-fill commercial area fronting on to Outer Highway 18. The Village Specific Plan will be consistent with Policy 4.J in that all new multi-family residential or mixed-use developments or redevelopment will be designed to be compatible with adjacent or nearby lot sizes and neighborhoods by complying with development standards and design guidelines to ensure quality development,
including additional setbacks and landscape/screening
buffers when located adjacent to residential developments or land uses.
f. Includes a statement of the relationship of the Specific Plan to the General Plan, Development Code and other applicable plans or ordinances;
Section I.5 of Chapter 1 of the Village Specific Plan discuss the relationship of the Specific Plan to the General Plan, as well as its consistency with it.
g. Address any other subjects that are necessary for
implementation of the General Plan;
The Specific Plan includes extensive design guidelines to assure that the Specific Plan area is developed with high-quality buildings and landscape features.

2. The location and design of the proposed development will be consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and with any

Ordinance No. 560
other applicable plan or policies adopted by the Town and with any other applicable provisions of the Development Code.

The Specific Plan was specifically envisioned in the General Plan, and the development standards and guidelines included in it are refinements of the Development Code.

3. The proposed location will allow the development to be well integrated with, or adequately buffered from, its surroundings, as appropriate.

The Specific Plan includes specific provisions for landscaping buffers, landscaped and building setbacks to assure that surrounding residential development is buffered from the proposed general and service commercial land uses.

4. All vehicular traffic generated by the development, either in phased increments or at build-out, will be accommodated safely and without causing significantly increased congestion upon adjoining streets.

The traffic impact analysis prepared for the EIR clearly demonstrates the level of improvements required and that the circulation system in the area will operate safely and without causing significantly increased congestion upon adjoining streets throughout the project’s development and at build out.

5. The final Specific Plan will identify a methodology to allow land uses to be adequately serviced by existing or proposed public facilities and services. In appropriate circumstances, and as provided elsewhere by the Development Code, the Town may require that suitable areas be reserved for uses such as schools, parks and pedestrian ways; public open spaces may be dedicated or reserved by private covenant for the common use of residents, establishments or operations in the development.

Chapter 5 of the Specific Plan includes discussion of all public services required for the Specific Plan area. The amount of residential growth within the Village Specific Plan does not necessitate areas to be reserved for schools and parks within the Village area, and/or beyond existing policies and the General Plan. The Village does provide opportunities for public open spaces integrated into private and public domains in the form of court yards and outdoor dining areas, as well as sidewalks and public rest areas with public seating and furniture.

6. In accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), environmental impacts have been reduced to a level of insignificance, or in the case where such impacts remain, a

Ordinance No. 560
statement of overriding considerations must be adopted to justify the merits of project implementation after certification of the Environmental Impact Report.

The EIR found that, although the project has the potential to result in significant impacts, these impacts can be mitigated to less than significant levels with the exception of impacts to greenhouse gas emissions. A Statement of Overriding Considerations is required as a part of the Town Council approval.

7. The proposed Specific Plan should contribute to a balance of land uses so local residents may work and shop in the community in which they live.

The purpose of the Specific Plan is, in part, to create a retail, restaurant and entertainment destination for residents to shop, visit, and work. The Village will create jobs for residents of Apple Valley and limit commute times, which currently exceed 30 minutes on the average, by providing a wide range of employment and shopping opportunities within Town limits.

8. The proposed Specific Plan will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare of the Town.

The Specific Plan includes development standards designed to assure that development is of high-quality and does not impact public health, safety or welfare.

Section 3. In order to maintain conformity, the three properties currently zoned Service Commercial (CS), known as APNs: 3087-351-52, 10, & 09, within District 4 shall have zoning and land use rights to develop and operate in accordance with the permitted uses and development standards in District 2 in addition to District 4.

Section 4. The Town Council hereby specifically finds that all the facts set forth in this Ordinance are true and correct.

Section 5. The Town Council hereby finds that the Village Specific Plan will have a significant effect on the environment, and the Town Council certifies the EIR and adopt the facts, findings and a statement of overriding considerations, as well as a mitigation monitoring and reporting program.

Section 6. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth in this Ordinance, the Town Council approves the Village Specific Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and said exhibits are incorporated herein by this reference. The existing zoning designations shall be eliminated and replaced with this adopted Village Specific Plan.

Section 7. Notice of Adoption. The Town Clerk of the Town of Apple Valley shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause publication to occur in a newspaper

Ordinance No. 560
of general circulation and published and circulated in the Town in a manner permitted under Section 36933 of the Government Code of the State of California.

Section 8. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after the date of its adoption.

Section 9. Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance, or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications and, to this end, the provisions of this Ordinance are declared to be severable.

APPROVED and ADOPTED by the Town Council of the Town of Apple Valley and signed by the Mayor and attested by the Town Clerk this 25th day of October, 2022. _________________________________
Kari Leon, Mayor
ATTEST:

La Vonda M-Pearson, Town Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
_____________________________ ___________________________________ Thomas Rice, Town Attorney Orlando Acevedo, Assistant Town Manager

Town Council Agenda Report
Date: October 25, 2022
To: Honorable Mayor and Town Council
Subject: CONSENT TO AWARD THE MUNI ROAD DRIVEWAY AND BOX

CULVERT PROJECT
From: Douglas Robertson, Town Manager
Submitted by: Mike Podegracz, Town Engineer
Engineering
Budgeted Item: Yes No N/A

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Award a contract to Jergensen Construction, inc. for the Muni Road Driveway and Box Culvert Project subject to "Approval as to Form" by the Town Attorney and "Approval as to Content" by the Town Manager;

BACKGROUND
Due to the realignment of Apple Valley Road at Highway 18, access to westerly Wika Road has been eliminated from Apple Valley Road in front of the Desert Mountain Plaza.

The Muni Road Driveway and Box Culvert Project will construct a new access point to the plaza from Muni Road at the intersection of Chiwi Road. The new driveway will be similar to the driveway/bridge located on Muni Road providing access to 17768 Wika Road.

On October 11, 2022, the Town received and opened bids for the subject project. The bid results are as follows:

Contractor Base Bid Price

1. Jergensen Construction, Inc. $254,262.87

2. CMB Structures, Inc. $267,781.80

3. TSR Construction and Inspection $274,404.00

4. Wright Construction Engineering Corp. $301,650.00

5. ANM Construction & Engineering $346,557.00

6. MLC Constructors, inc. $381,944.00

ANALYSIS
The bid documents for the projects were reviewed by staff for accuracy and constructability. The bid documents and the authorization to advertise were approved by Town Council on June 14, 2022. Staff reviewed the bid submissions for completeness and considers Jergensen Construction, Inc. to be the lowest qualified, responsible, and responsive bidder.

FISCAL IMPACT
Funding for this project has been appropriated in the adopted FY 2022-2023 budget using account 4410-5210-9473-0000.

ATTACHMENTS
A. Project Location

PROJECT LOCATION

Town Council Agenda Report
Date: October 25, 2022
To: Honorable Mayor and Town Council
Subject: RELEASE OF SECURITIES FOR PARCEL MAP 19705

From: Douglas Robertson, Town Manager
Submitted by: Mike Podegracz, Town Engineer
Engineering Department
Budgeted Item: Yes No N/A

RECOMMENDED ACTION
That the Town Council find that the construction of various improvements required for Parcel Map 19705 are complete and approve the 50% reduction of the performance securities and release of the labor and materials security.

BACKGROUND
Staff has inspected and approved the construction of Parcel Map 19705 improvements and recommends that the Town accept the improvements as complete and reduce the performance security and release of the labor and materials security to 50%. The remaining 50% of the performance security will be retained by the Town for one year as a warranty/maintenance bond.

Bond amounts for improvements are as follows:
(50% Reduction)
Improvement Performance Bond Warranty/Maintenance Bond
Streets $85,434 $42,717
Grading/Drainage $30,814 $15,407
Sewers $32,508 $16,254
Water $29,688 $14,844

ANALYSIS
When the Town Council accepted the final map for Parcel Map 19705 construction agreements and securities in the amounts listed above were required. The developer, CJC Holdings LLC., has now requested the release of securities since they have fulfilled the terms of the agreements to construct various improvements.

FISCAL IMPACT
No foreseable fiscal impact.

ATTACHMENTS
A. Location Map

Location Map

Town Council Agenda Report
Date: October 25, 2022
To: Honorable Mayor and Town Council
Subject: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2022-41, A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN

COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING THE APPLE VALLEY CHOICE ENERGY 2022
INTERGRATED RESOURCE PLAN.

From: Douglas Robertson, Town Manager
Submitted by: Sydnie Harris, Director of Finance
Finance
Budgeted Item: Yes No N/A

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends that the Town Council adopt Resolution No. 2022-41, approving the Apple Valley Choice Energy 2022 Integrated Resource Plan.

SUMMARY
Senate Bill 350 (SB 350), approved by the Governor on October 7, 2015, requires Apple Valley Choice Energy (AVCE) to submit an Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) to the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) every two years for certification to ensure that it meets the state's renewable energy and greenhouse gas reduction goals.

BACKGROUND
The Town’s Community Choice Aggregation (CCA) Program, AVCE, was established by the Town Council through the adoption of Ordinance No.486 on August 9, 2016.

Among other actions, SB 350 added Public Utilities Code section 454.52, which established the requirement for load-serving entities, including CCAs, to file an IRP with the CPUC. The bill also revised the Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS) for California, including AVCE. Specifically, it increased the minimum renewable energy standards from 33% by December 31, 2020, to 50% by December 31, 2030.

To ensure that CCAs meet these minimum standards and greenhouse gas emission reduction targets as established by the California Air Resources Board, an IRP is required to be filed with the CPUC for certification. The IRP looks at a 10-year time horizon and establishes a plan for AVCE’s procurement activities to meet the RPS and greenhouse

gas emission reduction targets. The IRP is merely a forecasted plan and does not commit AVCE to the specific actions identified to meet the RPS and greenhouse gas reduction targets. As such, the CPUC requires the IRP to be revised every two years. The Apple Valley Town Council approved its last and most recent IRP on September 8, 2020.

California Choice Energy Authority and its technical consultants, on behalf of AVCE, have been working closely with the CPUC to ensure the IRP is recorded in a format provided by them and meets all the established requirements. A complete copy of the proposed IRP is attached hereto and shall be kept on file in the Town Clerk’s Office.

FISCAL IMPACT
None

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 2022-41

2. 2022 AVCE Integrated Resource Plan

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-41

A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN

OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE
APPLE VALLEY CHOICE ENERGY 2022 INTEGRATED

RESOURCE PLAN
WHEREAS, Community Choice Aggregation (CCA), authorized by Assembly Bill 117, is a state law that allows cities, counties and other authorized entities to aggregate electricity demand within their jurisdictions in order to purchase and/or generate alternative energy supplies for residents and businesses within their jurisdiction while maintaining the existing electricity provider for transmission and distribution services; and WHEREAS, on August 9, 2016, the Town Council adopted Ordinance 486, Establishing a Community Choice Aggregation Program, Apple Valley Choice Energy; and
WHEREAS, Senate Bill 350, approved October 7, 2015, establishes a requirement for Community Choice Aggregation programs to develop an Integrated Resource Plan and submit it to the California Public Utilities Commission for certification; and WHEREAS, the Apple Valley Choice Energy Integrated Resource Plan was developed consistent with the requirements as established by the California Public Utilities Commission.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. That based upon and in consideration of staff reports, presentations, public testimony and comment, and such other matters presented to the Town Council during the public meeting on this matter, the Town Council finds and declares the foregoing recitals to be true and correct and incorporates the same as substantive findings herein.

SECTION 2. That the Integrated Resource Plan for Apple Valley Choice Energy has been developed in compliance with SB 350 and California Public Utilities Commission direction and is hereby approved.

SECTION 3. That the Town Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and it shall become effective immediately upon adoption.

Resolution 2022-41
APPROVED and ADOPTED by the Town Council of the Town of Apple Valley this 25th day of October 2022.

ATTEST: Kari Leon, Mayor
La Vonda M-Pearson, Town Clerk

St a n d ar d L S E Pl a n

P P L E A L L E Y H OI C E N E R G Y
2 0 2 2 N T E G R A T E D E S O U R C E L A N
O V E M B E R 1, 2 0 2 2

1 Ta ble of C o nte nts
I. I ntr o d u cti o n a n d E xec uti ve S u m mar y .................................................................................... 3 a. I ntr o d u cti o n ...................................................................................................................... 3 b. E xec uti ve S u m mar y ......................................................................................................... 7 II. St u d y Desi g n .......................................................................................................................... 9 a. O bjecti ves ......................................................................................................................... 9 b. Met h o d ol o g y .................................................................................................................. 1 0 i. M o deli n g T o ol(s)............................................................................................................ 1 0 i. M o deli n g A p pr oac h........................................................................................................ 1 1 III. St u d y Res ults ........................................................................................................................ 1 3 a. C o nf or mi n g a n d Alter nati ve P ortf oli os .......................................................................... 1 3 b. Preferre d C o nf or mi n g P ortf oli os .................................................................................... 1 8 ii. 3 0 M M T Preferre d C o nf or mi n g P ortf oli o .................................................................. 1 8 iii. 2 5 M M T Preferre d C o nf or mi n g P ortf oli o .................................................................. 2 1 c. G H G E missi o ns Res ults ................................................................................................. 2 4 d. L ocal Air P oll uta nt Mi ni mizati o n a n d Disa d va nta ge d C o m m u nities ............................ 2 5 i. L ocal Air P oll uta nts ....................................................................................................... 2 5 ii. F oc us o n Disa d v a nta ge d C o m m u nities ...................................................................... 2 6 e. C ost a n d Rate A nal ysis .................................................................................................. 2 7 f. S yste m Relia bilit y A nal ysis ........................................................................................... 2 8 g. Hi g h Electrificati o n Pla n ni n g ......................................................................................... 3 2 h. E xisti n g Res o urce Pla n ni n g ........................................................................................... 3 3 i. H y dr o Ge n erati o n Ris k Ma na ge me nt ............................................................................. 3 3 j. L o n g- D urati o n St ora ge Pla n ni n g ................................................................................... 3 4 k. Clea n Fir m P o wer Pla n ni n g ........................................................................................... 3 4 l. O ut - of-State Wi n d Pla n ni n g ........................................................................................... 3 4 m. Offs h ore Wi n d Pla n ni n g................................................................................................. 3 5 n. Tra ns missi o n Pla n ni n g ................................................................................................... 3 5 I V. Acti o n Pla n ........................................................................................................................... 3 6 a. Pr o p ose d Pr oc ure me nt A cti vities a n d P ote ntial Barriers ............................................... 3 6 i. Res o urces t o meet D. 1 9 - 1 1- 0 1 6 pr oc ur e me nt re q uire me nts .......................................... 3 7 ii. Res o urces t o meet D. 2 1 - 0 6- 0 3 5 pr oc ur e me nt re q uire me nts, i ncl u di n g: .................... 3 7 a. 1, 0 0 0 M W of fir m zer o- e mitti n g res o urce re q uir e me nts ............................................ 3 7 b. 1, 0 0 0 M W of l o n g- d urati o n st ora ge res o urce re q uire me nts ....................................... 3 7

2 c. 2, 5 0 0 M W of zer o-e missi o ns ge nerati o n, ge n erati o n paire d wit h st ora ge, or de ma n d res p o nse r es o urce re q uir e me nts ........................................................................................... 3 7 d. All ot her pr oc ur e me nt re q uire me nts ........................................................................... 3 7 iii. Offs h ore wi n d ............................................................................................................. 3 8 i v. O ut - of-state wi n d ........................................................................................................ 3 8 v. Ot her re n e wa bl e e ner g y n ot descri be d a b o v e ............................................................. 3 8 vi. Ot her e ner g y st ora g e n ot descri be d a b o ve .................................................................. 3 8 vii. Ot her d e ma n d res p o nse n ot descri be d a b o v e ............................................................. 3 8 viii. Ot her e ner g y efficie n c y n ot descri be d a b o v e.......................................................... 3 9 i x. Ot her distri b ute d ge nerati o n n ot descri be d a b o v e ...................................................... 3 9 x. Tra ns p ortati o n electrificati o n, i ncl u di n g a n y i n vest me nts a b o ve a n d be y o n d w hat is i ncl u de d i n I nt e grat e d E n er g y P olic y Re p ort (I E P R) ........................................................... 3 9 xi. B uil di n g electrificati o n, i ncl u di n g a n y i n vest me nts a b o ve a n d b e y o n d w hat is i ncl u de d i n I nt e grat e d E n er g y P olic y Re p ort (I E P R) ........................................................... 3 9 xii. Ot her ........................................................................................................................... 3 9 b. Disa d va nta ge d C o m m u nities.......................................................................................... 3 9 c. C o m missi o n Directi o n of Acti o ns .................................................................................. 4 1 V. Less o ns Lear n e d ................................................................................................................... 4 2 Gl oss ary of Ter ms ........................................................................................................................ 4 3

3 I. I ntr o d ucti o n a n d E xec uti ve S u m mar y
a. I ntr o d ucti o n
Descri pti o n of A V C E
T he T o w n of A p pl e Vall e y is a m u nici pal c or p or ati o n a n d ge neral la w t o w n or ga nize d a n d o perate d u n d er t he la ws of t he State of Calif or nia. T he T o w n of A p pl e Vall e y is g o ver ne d b y, a n d acc o u nta ble t o, re prese ntati ves electe d b y its citize ns. T he T o w n of A p ple Valle y o per ates n u mer o us pr o gra ms f or t he be nefit of its citize ns, i ncl u di n g A p ple Valle y C h oice E ner g y (“A V C E ”).

A V C E was f or m e d b y t he T o w n of A p ple Valle y T o w n C o u ncil o n A u g ust 9, 2 0 1 6, t hr o u g h Or di na nce 4 8 6 a n d be g a n ser vi n g l oa d i n A pril 2 0 1 7. A V C E c urr e ntl y pr o vi des retail electric ge nerati o n ser vices a n d c o m ple me ntar y e ner g y pr o gra ms t o c ust o mers wit hi n t he m u nici pal b o u n daries of t he T o w n of A p ple Valle y. A V C E la u nc he d as t he T o w n’s C o m m u nit y C h oice A g gre gati o n ( “ C C A ”) pr o gra m f or t he p ur p oses of pr o m oti n g l ocal c o ntr ol a n d l ocal ec o n o mic be nefits as well as offeri n g partici pati n g c ust o mers c o m petiti ve a n d sta ble r ates.

Fi g ure 1: Ser vice Are a M a p
A V C E c urr e ntl y ser ves a p pr o xi matel y 2 3, 0 0 0 resi de ntial acc o u nts a n d 2, 5 0 0 c o m mercial a n d i n d ustrial acc o u nts. A V C E pr o vi des retail ge n erati o n ser vice t o a v ariet y of c ust o mer classes, i ncl u di n g resi de ntial, s mall a n d me di u m c o m mercial acc o u nts, lar g e i n d ustrial c o ns u mers, a n d a gric ult ural a n d p u m pi n g facilities. A V C E’s ser vi ce ar ea h as a p o p ulati o n of a p pr o xi matel y 7 6, 0 0 0, t he maj orit y of w hic h li ve i n h o use h ol ds or w or k at b usi nesses t hat recei v e ge nerati o n ser vice fr o m A V C E. I n 2 0 2 1, A V C E ha d a pea k l oa d of 9 9 M W, a n d a t otal 2 0 2 1 e ner g y us a ge of 2 6 0 G W h.

A V C E has p urs ue d C C A i m ple me ntati o n acti vities u n der a s hare d ser vice m o del, w hic h mea ns A V C E has j oi ne d t o get her wit h ot her, r e gi o nall y l ocate d a n d cit y s pecific C C A pr o gra ms t o

4 pr o m ote a d mi nistrati ve efficie nci es b y o uts o urci n g ma n y o perati o nal a n d t ec h nical ser vices t y picall y re q uire d f or C C A a d mi nistrati o n an d o perati o n. T he Calif or nia C h oice E ner g y A ut h orit y, or Cal C h oice, is t he or ga nizati o n selecte d b y A V C E t o pr o vi de r e q uisite ser vices, i ncl u di n g res o urce pl a n ni n g a n d pr oc ur e me nt acti vities. Ke y decisi o ns of A V C E, i ncl u di n g rate setti n g, retail s u p pl y p ortf oli o c o m p ositi o n, dis p ositi o n of fi na ncial res er ves, a n d a d mi nistrati o n of c o m ple me ntar y pr o gra ms, are a d dr esse d b y t he T o w n of A p ple V alle y T o w n C o u ncil wit h s u p p orti n g i n p ut fr o m A V C E staff a n d Cal C h oice pers o n nel. D ue t o t he rel ati vel y s mall size of t he T o w n of A p ple V alle y ( b ot h i n ter ms of p o p ulati o n a n d retail sales), mea ni n gf ul A p ple Valle y a d mi nistrati ve efficie ncies ha v e bee n ac hie ve d t hr o u g h j oi nt s olicitati o n/ pr oc ure me nt a d mi nistrati o n t hr o u g h Cal C h oice. B y part neri n g wit h Cal C h oice, A V C E has b ee n a bl e t o esta blis h a n d p urs ue o bjecti ves a n d ke y para met ers t hat are directl y res p o nsi ve t o t he u ni q ue c o nstit ue nts a n d i nterests wit hi n t he T o w n of A p ple Valle y.

A V C E’s Missi o n
A V C E was f or m e d f or t h e e x press p ur p ose of e m p o weri n g t he T o w n t o c h o ose t he ge nerati o n res o urces t hat reflect its s pecific val u es, nee ds a n d c ost prefere n ces. M or e s pecificall y, A V C E see ks t o pr o vi de r elia ble electric s er vice, wit hi n t he T o w n, at c o m petiti ve r ates w he n c o m p are d t o t h ose rates off ere d b y t he i nc u m be nt electric utilit y a n d als o pri oritizes l ocal c o ntr ol, ec o n o mic de vel o p me nt a n d e n vir o n me ntal ste war ds hi p wit hi n t he T o w n of A p ple V alle y. C o nsiste nt wit h P u blic Utilities C o de Secti o ns 3 6 6. 2(a)( 5) a n d 4 5 4. 5 2 ( b)( 3), all pr oc ure me nt b y A V C E, i ncl u di n g t he p ortf oli os set f ort h i n t his I nte grate d Res o urce Pla n ( “I R P”), m ust c o m pl y wit h p olic y directi o n pr o vi de d fr o m A V C E’s g o ver ni n g b oar d, w hic h is c o m pris e d of t he T o w n of A p ple Valle y T o w n C o u ncil.

I ntr o d ucti o n t o A V C E ’s I RP
I n acc or da n ce wit h t he r e q uire me nts of Calif or nia P u blic Utilities C o de (“P U C ”) Secti o ns 4 5 4. 5 1 a n d 4 5 4. 5 2 a n d Calif or ni a P u blic Utilities C o m missi o n (“ C o m missi o n”) Decisi o n (“ D. ”) D. 2 2- 0 2- 0 0 4, A d mi nistr ative L a w J u d ge’s R uli n g Fi n alizi n g L o a d F orec asts a n d Gree n h o use G as E missi o ns Be nc h m arks f or 2 0 2 2 I nte gr ate d Res o urce Pl a n Fili n gs a n d g ui da nce pr o vi de d b y t he C o m missi o n’s E ner g y Di visi o n , A V C E is pr o vi di n g its l oa d-ser vi n g e ntit y (“ L S E”)-s pecific I R P t o t he C o m missi o n f or certificati o n a n d use i n t he C o m missi o n’s state wi de pla n ni n g pr ocess.

I n a d diti o n t o t his narrati ve, A V C E ’s I R P i ncl u des t he f oll o wi n g d oc u me nts:

A V C E ’s 2 0 3 0 3 8 M M T & 2 0 3 5 3 0 M M T Res o urce Dat a Te m plate a n d Clea n S yste m P o wer Calc ulat or
All f urt her citati o ns t o stat ute are t o t he Calif or nia P u blic Utilities C o de u nless ot her wise n ote d.

R ule ma ki n g (“ R.”) 2 0-0 5 - 0 0 3, A d mi nistr ative L a w J u d ge’s R uli n g Fi n alizi n g L o a d F orec asts a n d Gree n h o use G as E missi o ns Be nc h m arks f or 2 0 2 2 I nte gr ate d Res o urce Pl a n Fili n gs ("Fi nal R uli n g"), J u ne 1 5, 2 0 2 2.

E ner g y Di visi o n G ui da n ce ca n be accesse d at: htt ps:// w w w.c p uc.ca. g o v/i n d ustries-a n d t o pics/electrical e ner g y/ electric - p o w er- pr oc ur e me nt/l o n g-ter m- proc ur e me nt - pla n ni n g/ 2 0 2 2-ir p c ycle e ve nts a n d materi als .

5 A V C E ’s 2 0 3 0 3 0 M M T & 2 0 3 5 2 5 M M T Res o urce Dat a Te m plate a n d Clea n S yste m P o wer Calc ulat or
A V C E ’s I R P Verificati o n
As directe d i n D. 2 2- 0 2- 0 0 4 a n d t he Fi n al R uli n g , A V C E is s u b mitti n g t w o Preferre d C o nf or mi n g P ortf oli os i n t his I R P . T he first Pref erre d C o nf or mi n g P ortf oli o ac hie ves e missi o ns t hat are e q u al t o or less t ha n t he L S E’s pr o p orti o n al s hare of t h e 3 8 milli o n metric t o n (“ M M T”) gree n h o use g as (“ G H G”) tar get b y 2 0 3 0 a n d 3 0 M M T b y 2 0 3 5 (“ 3 0 M M T”). T he sec o n d Preferre d C o nf or mi n g P ortf oli o ac hie ves e missi o ns t hat are e q u al t o or less t ha n t he L S E’s pr o p orti o nal s hare of 3 0 M M T b y 2 0 3 0 a n d 2 5 M M T b y 2 0 3 5 (“ 2 5 M M T”).

Pr ojecti n g res o urce nee ds o ver t he pla n ni n g h oriz o n c o vere d b y t he I R P is a fl ui d pr ocess a n d A V C E e x pects c ha n ges o ver ti me . T he f ut ur e res o urces i de ntifie d i n A V C E ’s I R P re pres e nt A V C E ’s c urr e nt g o o d-f ait h pr ojecti o n of t he res o urce mi x t hat will be pr oc ure d o ver t h e I R P pla n ni n g h oriz o n. S uc h pr ojecti o ns are b ase d o n t h e best a vaila ble i nf or mati o n re gar di n g pla n ni n g directi ves, A V C E p olicy, res o urce a vail a bilit y a n d ot her ke y c o nsi derati o ns. T he res o urces i de ntifie d i n f ut ure iterati o ns of A V C E ’s I R P ma y c h a n ge d ue t o ne w i nf or mati o n a n d e v ol vi n g circ u msta nces, a n d t he ulti mate res o ur ce mi x t hat A V C E act uall y pr oc ures (i n f ut ure years) ma y differ fr o m w hat is reflect e d i n t his pla n d ue t o a n u m ber of v ari a bles, i ncl u di n g a vaila bilit y of s u p pl y, tec h n ol o g y c ha n ges, price of s u p pl y, a n d/ or ot her mar ket or re g ul at or y c o nsi derati o ns.

E xa m ples of f ut ure re g ul at or y c ha n g es i ncl u de t he u pc o mi n g “ Slice of Da y ” fra m e w or k f or t he Res o urce A d e q uac y (“ R A”) pr o gra m, t he i m ple me ntati o n of t he Ce ntral Pr oc ure me nt E ntit y (“ C P E”), as well as str uct ural, pr o gra m matic c ha n ges t o t he I R P pr o gra m. T h o u g h t he i m pact of t hese c h a n ges is u ncertai n at t his ti me, s uc h c ha n ges ha ve t he p ote ntial t o materiall y res ha p e h o w ca pacit y a n d e n er g y are val u e d f or relia bilit y p ur p oses, a n d i n t ur n, s uc h c ha n ges ma y i m pact A V C E ’s f ut ure pr oc ure me nt decisi o ns. T hr o u g h its i n v ol ve me nt a n d me m bers hi p i n t he Calif or nia C o m m u n it y C h oice Ass ociati o n (“ C al C C A”), A V C E will c o nti n ue t o m o nit or a n d e n ga ge i n C o m missi o n pr ocee di n gs a n d i nc or p or ate perti ne nt pla n ni n g a n d pr oc ure m e nt a da ptati o ns as necessar y.

T o w n C o u ncil A p pr ov al of I R P
I n c o m plia nce wit h P u blic Utilities C o de Secti o n 4 5 4. 5 2( b)( 3), t his I RP w as f or mall y s u b mitte d t o t he T o w n of A p ple V alle y T o w n C o u ncil f or a p pr o val base d o n t he I R P’s c o m plia nce wit h Secti o ns 4 5 4. 5 1 a n d 4 5 4. 5 2 (t he “ I R P Stat ute”) a n d all rele va nt c o u n cil -a d o pte d pr oc ur e me nt re q uire me nts of A V C E’s g o ver ni n g c o u ncil. O n O ct o ber 2 5, 2 0 2 2, t he T o w n of A p ple Valle y T o w n C o u ncil iss ue d a Res ol uti o n w hic h f or mall y a p pr o ve d t his I R P a n d a d o pte d A V C E’s 3 0 D. 2 2- 0 2- 0 0 4 at 2.

Decisi o n 2 2- 0 6- 0 5 0.

See Decisi o ns 2 0 - 0 6- 0 0 2, 2 2- 0 3- 0 3 4.

See R ule ma ki n g 2 0- 0 5- 0 0 3, A d mi nistr ative L a w J u d ge’s R uli n g Seeki n g C o m me nts o n St aff P a per o n Pr oc ure m e nt Pr o gr a ms a n d P ote nti al Ne ar- Ter m Acti o ns t o E nc o ur a ge A d diti o n al Pr oc ure me nt ( Se pt e m ber 8, 2 0 2 2), Attac h me nt A.

6 M M T a n d 2 5 M M T Pref erre d C o nf or mi n g P ortf oli os (“P C P ”). A V C E’s Res ol u ti o n als o ma de t he f oll o wi n g deter mi nati o ns re gar di n g A V C E’s P C Ps:

A V C E’s P C Ps are e x pecte d t o ac hie v e ec o n o mic, relia bilit y, e n vir o n me ntal, sec urit y, a n d ot her be nefits a n d perf or ma nce c h aracteristics t hat are c o nsiste nt wit h t he g oals set f ort h i n Secti o n 4 5 4. 5 2(a)( 1)( A-I).

A V C E’s P C Ps i ncl u de a di versifie d pr oc ure me nt p ortf oli o c o nsisti n g of b ot h s h ort- ter m a n d l o n g-ter m electricit y a n d electri cit y-relat e d a n d de ma n d re d u cti o n pr o d ucts.

A V C E’s P C Ps ac hie ve t he res o ur ce a d e q uac y re q uire me nts esta bli s he d p urs ua nt t o P u blic Utilities C o de Secti o n 3 8 0.

A V C E’s P C Ps are c o nsiste nt wit h t he pr oc ure m e nt ti mi n g, res o urce mi x, a n d o perati o nal attri b utes of b ot h t he C o m missi o n’s Preferre d S yste m P ortf oli o (“ P S P ”).

A V C E’s P C Ps are c o m plia nt wit h all A V C E b oar d- a d o pte d pr o c ure me nt directi ves.

Re q uest f or Certific ati o n
A V C E res pectf ull y re q uests t hat t he C o m missi o n certif y t his I R P.

As b ot h t he Le gislat ure a n d t he C o m missi o n ha ve rec o g nize d, t he Le gislat ure has gr a nte d C C As br oa d a ut h orit y t o pr oc ur e res o ur ces o n be h alf of t heir res pecti ve c ust o mers, a n a ut h orit y li mite d o nl y w here “ ot h er ge n erati o n pr oc ure me nt arra n g e me nts ha ve bee n e x pr essl y a ut h orize d b y stat ute.” Li ke wise, t h e L e gislat ure has gr a nte d C C As a ut o n o m y i n setti n g t heir o w n rates a n d ma na gi n g i nteracti o ns wit h t heir c ust o mers. 1 0 A V C E u n dersta n ds t hat t he C o m missi o n has t hree pri mar y i nterests i n t he C C A I R P pr ocess:

E ns uri n g t hat C C A I R Ps pr o vi de re q uisite pr o c ure me nt i nf or mati o n nee de d b y t he C o m missi o n t o de vel o p its state wi de pla n. 1 1 I n Decisi o n 2 2- 0 2- 0 0 4 at 1 0 5 a n d Or deri n g Para gra p h (“ O P”) 8, t he C o m missi o n a d o pte d t he 3 0 M M T C ore P ortf oli o wit h 2 0 2 0 I E P R De ma n d a n d Hi g h Electric Ve hicl e (“ E V ”) Pe netrati o n Sce nari o.

P U C Secti o n 3 6 6. 2(a)( 5).
1 0 D. 0 5- 1 2- 0 4 1 at 9- 1 1 (“ N ot hi n g i n t he stat ute directs t he C P U C t o re g ulate t he C C A’s pr o gra m e xce pt t o t he e xte nt t hat its pr o gra ms ma y affect utilit y o perati o ns a n d t he rates a n d ser vices t o ot her c ust o mers. F or e x a m ple, t he stat ute d oes n ot re q uire t he C P U C t o set C C A rates or re g ul ate t he q ualit y of its ser vices … We ar e c o nfi de nt t hat e xisti n g la w pr otects C C A c ust o mers. E ntities of l ocal g o ver n m e nt, s uc h as C C As, are s u bject t o n u mer o us la ws t hat will ha ve t he effect of pr otecti n g C C A c ust o mers a n d pr o m oti n g acc o u nt a bilit y b y C C As … ”). 1 1 D. 1 9- 0 4- 0 4 0 at 1 7- 1 8 (“ T he C o m missi o n’s p ortf oli o a g gre gati o n a n d e v al uati o n pr ocess, w hic h relies of f ulfill me nt of I R P fili n g re q uir e me nts b y L S Es, is t he o nl y pr ocess ca pa ble of assessi n g t he o ver all nee ds of t he C AI S O gri d a n d meeti n g t he state wi de G H G, relia bilit y, a n d least c ost g oals c ollecti vel y. W hile L S Es ma y use t heir I R P pr ocess t o meet l ocal pla n ni n g nee ds as well, t he state wi de pl a n ni n g f u ncti o n is t he stat ut oril y re q uire d pr o cess . . .”).

7 E ns uri n g t hat C C As’ c urre nt a n d pla n ne d pr oc ur e me nt is c o nsiste nt wit h t he R A re q uire me nts est a blis he d p urs ua nt t o P U C Secti o n 3 8 0. 5.1 2 E ns uri n g t hat C C As’ c urre nt a n d pla n ne d pr oc ur e me nt satisfies t he C C A’s s hare of re ne w a bles i nte grati o n r es o urces i de ntifie d i n t he C o m missi o n’s P S P , a n d t hat t he C C A eit her self- pr o vi des or pa ys f or i n vest or-o w n e d utilit y (“ I O U”) pr oc ure me nt t o s u p p ort its s hare of a n y re n e wa bl e i nte grati o n s h ortfall.1 3 A V C E has pre p are d its I R P wit h t hese i nterests i n mi n d, a n d t ha n ks t he C o m missi o n f or rec o g nizi n g a n d preser vi n g C C A pr oc ure me nt a ut o n o m y as well as t he be n efits of a c olla b orati ve pla n ni n g a p pr oac h wit h C C A or ga ni zati o ns i n its certificati o n re vie w of A V C E ’s I R P.
b. E xec uti ve S u m mar y
T his narrati ve pr o vi d es a detaile d descri pti o n of t he de vel o p me nt a n d c o nte nt of A V C E s P C Ps , eac h p ortf oli o’s c o m plia nce wit h a p plica bl e re q uire me nts, a n d a n acti o n pl a n detaili n g A V C E ’s ne xt ste ps (t o pr o m ote c o nf or ma nce wit h s uc h re q uire me nts).

A V C E de vel o pe d its I R P t hr o u g h t he f oll o wi n g ste ps:

A V C E c o m pile d data f or its e xisti n g e ner g y c o ntr acts, R A ca p acit y c o ntracts, a n d its s hare of ca pacit y f or all o cate d C ost All ocati o n Mec ha nis m (“ C A M ”) r es o urces.

F or eac h I R P pla n ni n g year, A V C E i de ntifie d its s h ort p ositi o ns relati ve t o k n o w n pla n ni n g tar gets a n d its assi g ne d l oa d f orecast.

A V C E p o p ulate d t he Res o urce D ata Te m plate wit h all c urre nt c o ntracts.

A V C E c o m pile d detaile d i nf or mati o n o n pr ojects f or w hic h it is c urre ntl y n e g otiati n g p o wer p ur c hase a gree me nts, i ncl u di n g i nf or mati o n re gar di n g pr oject s tat us a n d ti mi n g.

A V C E i de ntifie d f ut ure c o ntracts it e x pects t o sec ure f or n e w s olar, st or a ge, ge ot her mal , a n d wi n d ge nerati o n. A V C E pri oritize d t he selecti o n of f ut ure r es o urces t o e ns ure t hat A V C E’s o ver all p ortf oli o of ne w r es o urces is varie d, meets all re g ulat or y g o als, meets t he g oals e x press e d b y A V C E’s T o w n C o u ncil, a n d is esti mate d t o mi ni mize c osts t o c ust o mers, s u bject t o a p plica ble ma n dates . A V C E a d de d ge n eric f ut ur e c o ntracts wit h e xisti n g res o urces, i ncl u di n g lar ge h y dr oel ectric g e nerat ors, t o hel p fill its re mai ni n g o pe n p ositi o ns.

A V C E use d t he C o m missi o n’s Clea n S yste m P o wer Calc ulat or T o ol t o c h ec k t he G H G e missi o ns ass ociate d wit h t he res ulti n g p ortf oli o t o e ns ure t hat t hese e missi o ns are e q ui vale nt t o, or sli g htl y less t ha n, A V C E ’s assi g n e d s hare of t he 3 0 M M T be nc h mar k ; A V C E a d de d pla n n e d p urc hases of R P S q u alif yi n g re ne w a ble a n d lar ge h y dr oelectri c e ner g y i n s uffi cie nt v ol u me t o e ns ure t hat p ortf oli o e missi o ns were e q u al t o , or sli g htl y less t ha n, A V C E ’s assi g n e d s hare of t he 3 0 M M T G H G be nc h m ar k.

A V C E i de ntifie d t he res ulti n g p ortf oli o as its 3 0 M M T P C P. 1 2 Secti o n 4 5 4. 5 2( b)( 3)( C).
1 3 Secti o n 4 5 4. 5 1.

8 Usi n g t he 3 0 M M T P C P as a starti n g p oi nt, A V C E re place d pla n ne d s yste m e ner g y p urc hases wit h h y dr oelectric e ner g y pr oc ur e me nt u ntil t he p ortf oli o reflect e d e missi o ns e q ual t o, or sli g htl y less t ha n, A V C E ’s assi g ne d s h are of t h e 2 5 M M T G H G be nc h mar k.

A V C E i de ntifie d t he res ulti n g p ortf oli o as its 2 5 M M T P C P.

A V C E c hec k e d b ot h its 3 0 M M T P C P a n d its 2 5 M M T P C P f or relia bilit y b y c o m pari n g t he t otal p ortf oli o ca pacit y a gai nst A V C E ’s R A re q uire me nts as s h o w n i n t he Relia bilit y ta b a n d a d di n g i n s ufficie nt R A ca pacit y t o e ns ur e relia bilit y . A V C E f urt her esta blis he d t hat its pla n ne d i ncre me ntal ca pacit y pr oc ure m e nt met or e xcee de d its pr o r ata s har e of t he relate d i ncre me ntal ca pacit y pr oc ure me nt o bli gati o n.

A V C E reac he d t he f oll o wi n g fi n di n gs re gar di n g its 3 0 M M T p ortf oli o:

A V C E ’s 3 0 M M T p ortf oli o i ncl u des t he pr oc ure m e nt of t he f oll o wi n g ne w res o urces:

Ne w h y bri d r es o urces t otali n g 1 2 M W s olar/ 7 M W batter y st ora g e Ne w wi n d r es o urces t otali n g 3 5 M M
Ne w ge ot her mal res o urces t otali n g 3 M W
Ne w l o n g d urati o n st ora g e of 1 1 M W
A V C E’s 3 0 M M T p ortf oli o pr o vi des f or t he f oll o wi n g o verall res o urce mi x i n 2 0 3 5:
5 4 G W h of Lar ge H y dr o
6 G W h of Bi o mass
3 3 G W h of G e ot her mal
2 G W h of S mall H y dr o
1 1 4 G W h of Wi n d
9 6 G W h of S olar
3 3 M W h of S h ort D urati o n Batter y St ora ge
6 1 M W h of L o n g D ur ati o n St ora ge
5 5 M W of Nat ur al Gas/ B asel oa d/ Ot her ( Ca pacit y - O nl y) A V C E ’s 3 0 M M T p ortf oli o c o nf or ms t o t he pr oc ure me nt ti mi n g, res o urce q ua ntities, a n d ge neral res o ur ce attri b utes i de ntifie d i n t he P S P .

A V C E ’s 3 0 M M T p ortf oli o w o ul d ha ve 2 0 3 5 e missi o ns of 0. 0 2 4 9 M M T. T his is e q ui vale nt t o A V C E ’s assi g ne d s hare of 2 0 3 5 e missi o ns.

A V C E ’s 3 0 M M T p ortf oli o meets all rele va nt r elia bilit y metrics.

A V C E ’s 3 0 M M T p ortf oli o pr o vi des a p pr o xi matel y A V C E ’s l oa d- pr o p orti o nal s hare of re ne w a ble i nte gr ati o n res o urces.

A V C E reac he d t he f oll o wi n g fi n di n gs re gar di n g its 2 5 M M T P ortf oli o :

A V C E ’s 2 5 M M T P ortf oli o i ncl u des t he pr oc ure m e nt of t he f oll o wi n g ne w res o urces:

Ne w h y bri d r es o urces t otali n g 1 2 M W s olar/ 7 M W batter y st ora g e Ne w wi n d r es o urces t otali n g 3 5 M W
Ne w ge ot her mal res o urces t otali n g 3 M W
Ne w l o n g d urati o n st ora g e of 1 1 M W
A V C E ’s 2 5 M M T P ortf oli o pr o vi des f or t he f oll o wi n g o verall res o urce mi x i n 2 0 3 5:
6 9 G W h of ar ge y dr o
6 G W h of Bi o mass
3 3 G W h of G e ot her mal

9 2 G W h of S mall H y dr o
1 1 4 G W h of Wi n d
9 6 G W h of S olar
3 3 G W h of S h ort D ur ati o n Batter y St ora ge
6 1 G W h of L o n g D urati o n St ora ge
5 4 M W of Nat ur al Gas/ B asel oa d/ Ot her ( Ca pacit y - O nl y) A V C E ’s 2 5 M M T ortf oli o is c o nsiste nt wit h pr oc ure me nt ti mi n g, res o ur ce q ua ntities, a n d ge neral res o ur ce attri b utes i de ntifie d i n t he P S P .

A V C E ’s 2 5 M M T p ortf oli o w o ul d ha ve 2 0 3 0 e missi o ns of 0. 0 2 4 7 M M T a n d 2 0 3 5 e missi o ns of 0. 0 1 9 9 M M T , w hic h is e q ui vale nt t o or less t ha n A V C E ’s assi g ne d s hare of 2 0 3 0 a n d 2 0 3 5 e missi o ns.

A V C E ’s 2 5 M M T p ortf oli o meets all rele va nt r elia bilit y metrics.

A V C E ’s 2 5 M M T p ortf oli o pr o vi des a p pr o xi matel y A V C E ’s l oa d- pr o p orti o nal s hare of re ne w a ble i nte gr ati o n res o urces.

A V C E ’s 2 5 M M T p ortf oli o is als o c o nsiste nt wit h t he C o m missi o n ’s P S P a n d ca n be use d i n eit her a 2 5 M M T or 3 0 M M T c o ns oli date d state wi de p ortf oli o.

T o i m ple me nt its P C P, A V C E is a d o pti n g t he acti o n pla n descri be d i n Secti o n I V, b el o w. T his acti o n pla n c o nsists of t he f oll o wi n g ste ps:

A V C E will peri o dicall y s olicit offers f or n e w r e ne wa ble ge n erati o n a n d st ora ge pr oj ects.

T hese res o urces are t y picall y sec ure d t hr o u g h l o n g- ter m p o wer p urc h ase a gree me nts.

A V C E e x pects t o sec ure p o wer p ur c hase a gree me nts f or ne w pr ojects i n m ulti ple s olicitatio ns c o n d ucte d o ver t he ne xt se v eral y ears.

Peri o dicall y t hr o u g h o ut t he year, A V C E will s olicit offers f or s h ort ter m r e ne wa ble e ner g y, r es o urce a d e q uac y, s yste m e ner g y, a n d ot h er pr o d ucts nee de d t o bal a nce t he p ortf oli o a n d a d her e t o p ositi o n li mits esta blis he d t hr o u g h A V C E ’s ris k ma na ge me nt p olic y a n d practices. T hese s olicitati o ns ma y ta ke t he f or m of a f or mal r e q u est f or off ers pr ocesses, bilateral disc ussi o ns, a n d/ or tra nsacti o ns arra n g e d t hr o u g h br o k er mar kets.

A V C E will c o nti n ue t o pr oc ure res o ur ces t o meet a n y re mai ni n g assi g ne d r e q uire me nts fr o m D. 1 9- 1 1- 0 1 6 a n d D. 2 1- 0 6-0 3 5, as w ell as t he s pecific s u b cat e g ories fr o m t hat decisi o n.

II. St u d y Desi g n
a. O bjecti ves
A V C E ha d t he f oll o wi n g o bjecti ves i n perf or mi n g t he a nal ytical w or k t o d e vel o p its I R P:

1. I d e ntif y a 3 0 M M T P C P wit h e missi o ns e q ual t o or sli g htl y less t ha n A V C E ’s pr o p orti o nal s hare of t he 3 0 M M T G H G re d u cti o n be nc h mar k, as deter mi n e d usi n g t he C o m missi o n’s e missi o ns calc ulat or.

1 0

2. I d e ntif y a 2 5 M M T P C P wit h e missi o ns e q ual t o or sli g htl y less t ha n A V C E ’s pr o p orti o nal s hare of t he 2 5 M M T G H G re d u cti o n be nc h mar k, as deter mi n e d usi n g t he C o m missi o n ’s e missi o ns calc ulat or.

3. I d e ntif y 3 0 a n d 2 5 M M T P C Ps t hat ac hie ve ec o n o mic, relia bilit y, e n vir o n me ntal, sec urit y, a n d ot her b e nefits a n d perf or m a nce c har acteristics t hat are c o nsiste nt wit h t he g oals set f ort h i n Secti o n 4 5 4. 5 2(a)( 1)( A- I).

4. I d e ntif y di verse a n d bala nce d 3 0 a n d 2 5 M M T P C Ps t hat i ncl u de b ot h s h ort- ter m a n d l o n g-ter m electri cit y pr o d ucts as well as electricit y-relate d d e ma n d r e d ucti o n pr o d ucts.

5. I d e ntif y p ortf oli os t hat ac hie ve t he res o urce a de q u ac y re q uire me nts esta blis he d p urs ua nt t o P U C Sectio n 3 8 0 a n d pr o vi de A V C E ’s s hare of s yste m relia bilit y a n d re ne wa ble i nte grati o n res o ur ces.

6. I d e ntif y p ortf oli os t hat c o m pl y wit h all of A V C E ’s B oar d -a d o pte d pr oc ur e me nt directi ves.

7. I d e ntif y p ortf oli os t hat ar e c o m plia nt wit h A V C E ’s o bli gati o ns u n der t he Re ne wa bl es P ortf oli o Sta n dar d (“ R P S ”) pr o gr a m.

8. I d e ntif y p ortf oli os t hat ar e c ost-effecti ve a n d mi ni mize rate i m pacts o n A V C E ’s c ust o mers.
b. Met h o d ol o g y
i. M o deli n g T o ol(s)
I n d e vel opi n g its pla n ne d p ortf oli os, A V C E use d t he m o deli n g perf or m e d b y t he E ner g y Di visi o n usi n g R E S O L V E a n d S E R V M a n d i nc or p orate d a p plica ble o ut p uts i nt o t he R D T v 3 a n d C S P te m plates as a starti n g p oi nt. After e val u ati n g relate d r es ults , A V C E c o ns ulte d wit h Cal C h oice, le vera gi n g its e xte nsi ve e x perie nce a n d e x pertise i n t he areas of res o ur ce pla n ni n g a n d pr oc ur e me nt, t o c o nstr uct A V C E’s o w n, i nter nall y de vel o pe d m o dels t o q ua ntif y p ortf oli o tar gets f or r e ne w a ble e n er g y c o nte nt, ca p acit y, a n d p ortf oli o G H G e missi o ns, as well as p h ysical a n d fi na ncial p ositi o ns c o nf or mi n g wit h A V C E’s c urre ntl y effecti ve ris k m a na ge me nt p olicies a n d b usi ness practices.

A V C E als o utilize d its c o m mercial e ner g y tra di n g a n d ris k ma na ge m e nt s yste m t o m o nit or p ositi o ns, mar ket e x p os ure, cr e dit e x p os ure, v al ue- at-ris k, a n d ot her ris k ma na ge me nt metri cs.

A V C E has mai ntai ne d a rec or d of all s uc h tra ns acti o ns i n t his s yste m f or se v eral years a n d pla ns t o c o nti n ue usi n g t his s yste m t o facilitate tra nsacti o n ma na ge me nt, r es o urce pla n ni n g, a n d ris k ma na ge me nt acti vities.

A V C E use d t he o ut p uts of its e ner g y tra di n g a n d ris k ma na ge me nt s yste m t o de vel o p re p orts a n d m o dels w hic h wer e t he n a nal yze d t o assess a n n ual, m o nt hl y, a n d h o url y o pe n p ositi o ns b y c o nsi deri n g all f or ecaste d electric l oa ds a n d e x p ecte d deli veries fr o m A V C E’s res o urce p ortf oli o.

A V C E als o use d a pr o prietar y fi na n cial m o del t o pr oject p o wer s u p pl y c osts base d o n e xistin g a n d pla n ne d pr o c ure m e nt s as well as a n o v erall fi n a ncial assess me nt of re v e n ues, c osts, a n d cas h fl o ws. C urre nt mar k et c o n diti o ns were c o nsi der e d w he n c o m pili n g a n y c osts ass ociate d wit h e x pecte d/ pla n n e d p urc h ases; act ual c osts, base d o n e xisti n g pr oc ur e me nt c o ntracts, wer e

1 3
a de q uac y res o ur ces, as w ell as c o nsi derati o n of t h e st u dies a n d m o deli n g u n derl yi n g t he a d o pte d P S P.

C o nfir mi n g Reli a bility
A V C E ’s p ortf oli os wer e e val uate d t o e ns ure t hat s ufficie nt de p e n da ble ca p acit y ( net q ualif yi n g ca pacit y) w o ul d be a v aila ble t o meet pea k l o a d re q uire me nts , as s h o w n i n t he R D T v 3. T his i ncl u de d a 1 4 % Perfect C a pacit y (“ P C A P ”) Pl a n ni n g Reser ve Mar gi n. 1 7 A V C E use d tec h n ol o g ys pecific Effecti ve L o a d Carr yi n g Ca pacit y ( “E L C C ”) fact ors pr o vi de d b y t he C o m missi o n t o assess t he c o ntri b uti o n of eac h r es o urce t o s yste m relia bilit y. I n or d er t o e ns ure t hat its p ortf oli o met t he relia bilit y re q uire me nts, A V C E a d de d s ufficie nt s h ort-ter m R A ca p acit y i n eac h y ear.

A V C E ’s p ortf oli os wer e desi g ne d t o e ns ure t hat c urre nt i ncr e me ntal res o ur ce a d e q uac y ca p acit y o bli gati o ns fr o m D. 1 9- 1 1- 0 1 6 a n d D. 2 1- 0 6- 0 3 5 will be met .

C alc ul ati n g G H G E missi o ns
A V C E calc ulat e d t he e missi o ns ass ociate d wit h its 3 0 M M T P C P a n d its 2 5 M M T P C P usi n g t he C o m missi o n’s Clea n S yste m P o wer calc ul at or. T h e assi g ne d l oa d f orecast a n d defa ult l oa d s ha pes a n d be hi n d t he m eter a dj ust me nts were us e d f or t his assess me nt, al o n g wit h t he pla n ne d s u p pl y p ortf oli os. T he res ults were c hec ke d a gai nst t he assi g ne d G H G be n c h mar ks i ncl u de d i n t he Clea n S yste m P o wer t o ols.

III. St u d y Res ults
a. C o nf or mi n g a n d Alter nati ve P ortf oli o s
As re q uire d b y t h e C o m missi o n, A V C E is s u b mitti n g t w o c o nf or mi n g p ortf oli os – a 3 0 M M T C o nf or mi n g P ortf oli o t hat ac hie ves A V C E ’s s har e of t he 3 8 M M T b y 2 0 3 0 a n d 3 0 M M T b y 2 0 3 5 G H G tar g ets; a n d a 2 5 M M T C o nf or mi n g P ortf oli o t hat ac hie ves A V C E ’s s hare of t h e 3 0 M M T b y 2 0 3 0 a n d 2 5 M M T b y 2 0 3 5 G H G tar g ets. A V C E is n ot s ub mitti n g alter nati ve p ortf oli os.

A V C E ’s 3 0 M M T C o nf or mi n g P ortf oli o
T he f oll o wi n g ta ble pr o vi des a s u m mar y of A V C E ’s 2 0 3 5 3 0 M M T P ortf oli o, i de ntif yi n g res o urces b y t y pe a n d disti n g uis hi n g bet wee n t he f oll o wi n g pr oc ure me nt cate g ories:

E xisti n g res o urces ( e ner g y a n d ca p acit y) t hat A V C E o w ns or c o ntracts wit h, c o nsiste nt wit h defi niti o ns pr o vi de d i n t he Res o urce D ata Te m plate.

E xisti n g res o urces ( e ner g y a n d ca p acit y) t hat A V C E pla ns t o c o ntract wit h i n t he f ut ure.

E xisti n g res o urces ( ca pacit y) t hat A V C E partiall y pa ys f or t hr o u g h C A M.

Ne w Res o ur ces ( e ner g y a n d ca p acit y) t hat ar e u n der de vel o p me nt t hat A V C E is pla n ni n g t o pr oc ure.

F ut ure ne w res o urces (e n er g y a n d ca pacit y) t hat A V C E is pla n ni n g t o pr oc ure. 1 7 See W orks h o p: R eli a bility Fili n g Re q uire me nts f or L o a d Servi n g E ntities’ 2 0 2 2 I nte gr ate d Res o urce Pl a ns- R es ults of P R M a n d E L C C St u dies (J ul y 2 9, 2 0 2 2) at Sli de 3 1.

1 8
b. Preferre d C o nf or mi n g P ortf oli os
ii. 3 0 M M T Preferre d C o nf or mi n g P ortf oli o
As de m o nstrate d i n Attac h me nt A t o A V C E ’s I R P, A V C E ’s 3 0 M M T P C P c o nsists of a c o m bi nati o n of:

Nat ural Gas
Bi o mass
Ge ot her mal
Wi n d
Wi n d o n Ne w- O ut - of-State Tra ns missi o n
Offs h ore Wi n d
Utilit y Scale S olar
H y bri d S olar Pl us St ora ge
Batter y St ora ge
P u m pe d ( L o n g- D urati o n) St ora ge
S he d De ma n d Res p o nse
As state d a b o ve, i n acc or da nce wit h Secti o n 4 5 4. 5 1( b)( 3), A V C E ’s g o ver ni n g b oar d has deter mi ne d t hat t he r es o urce mi x i n 3 0 M M T P C P ac hie ves “ec o n o mic, reli a bilit y, e n vir o n me ntal, sec urit y, a n d ot her be n efits a n d perf or ma nce c h aracteristics t hat are c o nsiste nt wit h t he g oals set f ort h i n [ Secti o n] 4 5 4. 5 1(a)( 1)].” T hese be n efits a n d c h aracteristics ar e disc usse d as f oll o ws. A V C E prefers t h e 3 0 M M T P C P o ver t he 2 5 M M T P C P, disc usse d i n t he ne xt secti o n. T he 3 0 M M T P C P c o nti n ues A V C E t o war d s u bsta ntial e missi o ns re d ucti o ns, b ut als o pr o vi des a di vers e a n d relia ble p ortf oli o, w hile m o derati n g c ost i m pacts t o c ust o mers. T hese be nefits a n d c h aracteristi cs are disc uss e d i n t he f oll o wi n g secti o ns.

G H G Re d ucti o n G oals
A V C E ’s 30 M M T P C P ac hie ves r es ults a n d perf or ma nce c har acteristics c o nsiste nt wit h t he Secti o n 4 5 4. 5 2(a)( 1)( A) g oal of meeti n g t he C o m missi o n’s 3 0 M M T G H G re d ucti o n be nc h m ar k ( 3 8 M M T G H G b y 2 0 3 0).2 3 T he 2 0 3 5 e missi o ns fr o m A V C E ’s 30 M M T P C P are e q ui vale nt t o A V C E ’s l oa d- pr o p orti o nal s hare of t h e 3 0 M M T b y 2 0 3 5 e missi o ns tar get. A V C E ’s pr o p orti o nal s hare of t he 30 M M T G H G tar get is 0. 0 3 3 1 M M T i n 2 0 3 0 a n d 0. 0 2 5 2 M M T i n 2 0 3 5. Acc or di n g t o t he C o m missi o n’s e missi o ns calc ulat or, A V C E ’s 30 M M T P C P w o ul d acc o u nt f or 0. 0 3 2 8 M M T i n 2 0 3 0 a n d 0. 0 2 4 9 M M T i n 2 0 3 5 e missi o ns, w hic h is less t ha n t he G H G Be nc h mar ks f or A V C E .

Re ne w a ble E ner g y
A V C E ’s 30 M M T P C P ac hie ves r es ults a n d perf or ma nce c har acteristics c o nsiste nt wit h t he Secti o n 4 5 4. 5 2(a)( 1)( B) g oal of e ns uri n g t hat p ortf oli os are c o m p ose d of at least 6 0 % eli gi ble 2 3 See D. 2 2 - 0 2- 0 0 4 at 1 0 5.