APPLE VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL
AGENDA
Tuesday, May 27, 2025, 6:30 p.m.
Council Chamber
PLEASE SILENCE CELL PHONES UPON ENTERING THE CHAMBER
THIS MEETING IS BROADCAST LIVE AND VIEWABLE ON FRONTIER CHANNEL 29 OR CHARTER SPECTRUM CHANNEL 186 AND LIVE STREAMED ONLINE AT HTTPS://APPLEVALLEY.TV. THE TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY SUPPORTs PUBLIC COMMENTS
FOR INDIVIDUALS NOT PHYSICALLY PRESENT AND STILL WISHING TO MAKE PUBLIC COMMENTS. PLEASE EMAIL YOUR COMMENT TO [email protected].
COMMENTS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED BY 12:00 P.M. ON THE MEETING DATE TO BE INCLUDED IN THE RECORD.
The meeting will occur in the Council Chamber located at 14955 Dale Evans Parkway in Apple Valley, California.
This is an agenda for the scheduled meeting of the Town of Apple Valley.
This agenda contains a brief description of each item of business to be considered at today’s meeting. In accordance with the Brown Act, this meeting agenda is posted at least 72 hours prior to the regularly scheduled meeting. The agenda, its supporting documents and all writings received by the Town Council related to these items are public records and available for review during regular business hours in the Town Clerk’s office in the Town Council Chamber. The agenda and its supporting documents, along with live and archived video of the meeting, can be viewed online at http://www.applevalley.org. However, the online agenda may not include all available supporting documents or the most current version of documents.
Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Council after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the Town Clerk’s Office at 14955 Dale Evans Parkway, Apple Valley, CA during normal business hours. Such documents are also available on the Town of Apple Valley website at www.applevalley.org subject to staff’s ability to post the documents before the meeting.
Items listed on the Consent Calendar are expected to be routine and non-controversial and, unless the Town Council directs that an item be held for further discussion, the entire Consent Calendar will be acted upon as the first item of business. If the Town Council directs that an item listed on the Consent Calendar be held for further discussion, the item will be addressed immediately after approval of the Consent Calendar.
In accordance with the Rules of Procedure, members of the public may address the Town Council on any item on the agenda and on any matter that is within the Town Council’s jurisdiction. To address the Town Council regarding an item, complete and submit the yellow card entitled Request to Speak.
Please indicate on the card whether you are speaking under Public Comments or on an item that is listed on the agenda and please list the item number.
No action or discussion shall be undertaken on any item not appearing on the posted agenda, except that members of the Town Council/Redevelopment Agency or its staff may briefly respond to statements made or questions posed by persons exercising their public testimony rights under Section 54954.3.
When called, approach the podium and if desired, please state your name before giving your presentation. Speakers may address the Town Council for up to three (3) minutes. Speakers are to address the Town Council as a whole through the Presiding Officer. Comments to individual Council Members and/or staff are not permitted.
Individuals, who demonstrate disruptive conduct during Town Council meetings that prevent the Town Council from conducting its meeting in an orderly manner, are guilty of a misdemeanor as stated in PC403, disrupting a public meeting and are subject to removal from the chamber or arrest.
The Town of Apple Valley recognizes its obligation to provide equal access to those individuals with disabilities. Please contact the Town Clerk’s Office at (760) 240-7000 two working days prior to the scheduled meeting for any requests for reasonable accommodations.
Pages
1. Call to Order
2. Opening Ceremonies
2.1 Invocation
President Marc Lacey from Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints Apple Valley
2.2 Pledge of Allegiance
2.3 Presentations
3. Public Comments
4. Councilmember Committee/Commission/Community Participation 5 Councilmembers to make brief reports on their participation on committees, boards, and commissions on the Town’s behalf since the last meeting.
Councilmembers may also make brief reports on their community participation.
No formal action will be taken.
5. Town Council Announcements
5.1 Suggested items for next Agenda
5.2 Time, Date & Place for Next Town Council Regular or Special Meeting A. Regular Meeting - June 10, 2025 - Council Chambers Regular Session at 6:30pm
6. Town Council Consent Agenda
Recommended Motion:
To approve the Consent Calendar items numbered 6.1 to 6.4 as recommended.
6.1 APPROVAL OF MINUTES 7
That the Town Council approve the subject minutes as part of the consent agenda.
6.2 APRIL 2025 COMMERCIAL WARRANTS AND WIRE TRANSFER
SCHEDULES
15 That the Town Council receive, ratify, and file the Commercial Warrants and Wire Transfer Schedules as presented.
6.3 APRIL 2025 PAYROLL/BENEFITS WARRANTS SCHEDULE 30
That the Town Council receive, ratify and file the payroll/benefits warrants as presented.
6.4 PURCHASE OF ADDITIONAL VERKADA SECURITY CAMERAS,
ACCESS CONTROL AND IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES FOR THE
SINGH CENTER
32 That Council authorize the purchase of additional security cameras, access control system and implementation services for the Town’s existing Verkada solution at the Singh Center for the Arts, from Matrix Audio Visual Designs, Inc. in the amount of $104,858.88, and authorize the Town Manager or designee to execute appropriate agreements and documentation
7. Public Hearings
8. Business of the Council
8.1 INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION (ICE) 66
Approve recommendations of Kimley Horn’s Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) for a Roundabout at the intersection of Yucca Loma Road and Rincon Road.
A.
Direct staff to provide for approval an addendum to Kimley Horn and Associates’ current contract for the design of the Yucca Loma Road widening project to include the design and
specifications for the Roundabout at Yucca Loma Road and Rincon Road.
B.
8.2 AWARD A GOODS AND SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE
OF THE VETERANS MONUMENT AT CAPTAIN JOSEPH
MCCONNELL JR. USAF PARK
149
Award a Goods and Services Agreement to Monument Warehouse, LLC. for the Apple Valley Veterans Monument subject to “Approval as to Form” by the Town Attorney and “Approval as to Content” by the Town Manager.
8.3 PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO PERSONNEL POLICIES AND
PROCEDURES MANUAL AND DIRECTION ON COMPENSATION
ADJUSTMENT OPTIONS
177
That the Town Council approve the proposed amendments to the Town’s Personnel Policies and Procedures Manual and provide direction on how best to address salary inequities and implement structural changes to employee compensation based on recent findings.
9. Reports, Requests and Communications
10. Town Manager’s Comments & Legislative Update
11. Closed Session
None.
12. Adjournment
Recommended Motion:
To adjourn the meeting of the Apple Valley Town Council at TIME.
TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY
TOWN COUNCIL SERVING ON BOARDS, COMMITTEES & COMMISSIONS
CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMITTEES
HISTORICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (HAC)
Council Member Cusack
Meets every 2nd Tuesday of each month at 9:00 a.m.,
(location may vary)
SPECIAL ADVISORY COMMITTEES
DISASTER PREPAREDNESS*
Mayor - Chairman
Meets quarterly at 1:30 p.m., Town of Apple Valley
Conference Center - Development Services Building
14975 Dale Evans Parkway, Apple Valley.
TRAFFIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE (TAC)
Mayor Nassif
Meets as needed.
Town Council Chambers
TOWN PERSONNEL COMMITTEE
Mayor Nassif
Council Member Bishop
Meets as needed
PARK AND RECREATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Mayor Nassif
Mayor Pro-Tem Emick
AD HOC COMMITTEES
APPLE VALLEY ROAD AD HOC COMMITTEE
Mayor Nassif
VILLAGE MERCHANTS AD HOC COMMITTEE
Mayor Pro-Tem Emick
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN CRITERIA
AD-HOC COMMITTEE
Council Member Bishop
Council Member Leon
AGENCY - BOARDS/COMMITTEES &
COMMISSIONS
CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS INSURANCE
AUTHORITY (CJPIA)
Mayor Nassif – Director
Exec. Committee meets every 4th Wednesday of each
month at 7:00 p.m., La Palma, CA.
CAL CITIES/DESERT MOUNTAIN DIVISION (DMD)
Mayor Nassif- Voting Delegate
Council Member Bishop – Alternate
Meets as needed, rotating cities.
MOJAVE DESERT AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT
DISTRICT (MDAQMD)
Council Member Leon-– Delegate
Mayor Pro-Tem Emick – Alternate
Meets every 4th Monday of each month at 10:00 a.m.,
14306 Park Avenue, Victorville
MOJAVE DESERT AND MOUNTAIN RECYCLING
AUTHORITY
Council Member Cusack – Delegate
Council Member Bishop – Alternate
Meets quarterly on the 2nd Thursday February, May,
August and November at 10:00 a.m.
at the Materials Recovery Facility, 17000 Abbey Lane,
Victorville
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION
AUTHORITY (SBCTA)
Council Member Bishop - Board Member
Council Member Cusack – Alternate
Meets 2
nd Wednesday of each month at 9:00 a.m.,
I10/I15 Corridor meets 2nd Thursday at 10:00 a.m.
1170 West 3rd St.
San Bernardino
SOLID WASTE ADVISORY TASK FORCE (SWAT)
Council Member Cusack – Committee Member
Julie Ryan - Alternate
Meets as needed on Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m.
Sam J. Racadio Library & Environmental Learning
Center Community Room 7863 Central Ave. Highland
VICTOR VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY (VVEDA)
(George Air Force Base Reuse Task Force)
Mayor Pro-Tem Emick – Commissioner
Council Member Bishop – Alternate
Meets as needed, SCLA
VICTOR VALLEY TRANSIT AUTHORITY (VVTA)
Mayor Pro-Tem Emick – Representative
Council Member Leon - Alternate
Meets every 3rd Monday of each month at 9:30 a.m.,
Victorville City Hall
VICTOR VALLEY WASTEWATER RECLAMATION
AUTHORITY (VVWRA)
Mayor Nassif – Commissioner
Council Member Bishop – Alternate
Meets every 3rd Thursday at 7:30 a.m.
VVWRA Offices
GREATER HIGH DESERT CHAMBERS
GOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS COMMITTEE
Council Member Bishop – Representative
Council Member Cusack – Alternate
*These Boards, Committees and
Commissions require the Mayor to serve
as the representative.
Town Council Agenda Report
Date: May 27, 2025
To: Honorable Mayor and Town Council
Subject: APPROVAL OF MINUTES
From: Douglas Robertson, Town Manager
Submitted by: La Vonda M-Pearson, Director of Government Services/Town Clerk Government Services Department/Town Clerk Department
Budgeted Item: Yes No N/A
RECOMMENDED ACTION
That the Town Council approve the subject minutes as part of the consent agenda.
SUMMARY
A. Regular Meeting May 13, 2025.
Apple Valley Town Council
MINUTES
May 13, 2025, 6:30 p.m.
Council Chamber
Members Present: Mayor Scott Nassif
Mayor Pro Tem Curt Emick
Council Member Art Bishop
Council Member Larry Cusack
Council Member Kari Leon
_____________________________________________________________________
1. Call to Order
Mayor Nassif called to order the regular session of the Apple Valley Town Council at 6:30 p.m.
2. Opening Ceremonies
2.1 Invocation
Pastor Billy Simpson from Spirit Life Church Apple Valley
2.2 Pledge of Allegiance
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Council Member Bishop.
2.3 Presentations
None
3. Public Comments
Kerry Henard, Apple Valley, asked Council about installing cameras in the Council Chambers to show the public commentors. Mr. Henard also spoke about the increasing legal fee for the Liberty Utilities eminent domain case.
Autumn Cotton, Apple Valley, spoke about the misinformation surrounding issues at the Apple Valley Animal Shelter, and clarified some concerns of residents.
Diane Desmerias, Apple Valley, is concerned about crowding of animals at the Apple Valley Animal Shelter.
TC MINUTES MAY 27, 2025
2 John Williams, Barstow, came to observe and learn from the Apple Valley Town Council. Mr. Williams provided clarity on what the Town Council can and cannot do during Public Comments based on his experience as a Council Member in Barstow.
Israel Riley, Apple Valley, Christ the Solid Rock Church, thanked the Housing Department for the support that the Town provides them which enables them to provide services in Apple Valley.
Chuck Walgenbach, Apple Valley, has a concern about excessive music in his neighborhood, and would like increased cooperation between the Code Department and Police Department.
4. Councilmember Committee/Commission/Community Participation Councilmembers to make brief reports on their participation on committees, boards, and commissions on the Town’s behalf since the last meeting.
Councilmembers may also make brief reports on their community participation.
No formal action will be taken.
Council Member Bishop commented on committee meetings and events that he attended.
Council Member Leon commented on committee meetings and events that she attended.
Council Member Cusack commented on committee meetings and events that he attended.
Mayor Pro Tem Emick commented on committee meetings and events that he attended.
Mayor Nassif commented on committee meetings and events that he attended.
5. Town Council Announcements
5.1 Suggested items for next Agenda
5.2 Time, Date & Place for Next Town Council Regular or Special Meeting A. Regular Meeting - May 27, 2025 - Council Chambers Regular Session at 6:30pm
6. Town Council Consent Agenda
Council Member Bishop thanked staff for the work on Agenda item 6.2 and clarified the funding source used for the project.
TC MINUTES MAY 27, 2025
3 Motion by: Mayor Pro Tem Emick
Seconded by: Council Member Cusack
To approve the Consent Calendar items numbered 6.1 to 6.6 as recommended.
Yes (5): Mayor Nassif, Mayor Pro Tem Emick, Council Member Bishop, Council Member Cusack, and Council Member Leon
Carried (5 to 0)
6.1 APPROVAL OF MINUTES
That the Town Council approve the subject minutes as part of the consent agenda.
6.2 AWARD POWHATAN ROAD COMPLETE STREETS PROJECT
Award a Professional Services Agreement to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. for Design Services for the Powhatan Road Complete Streets project subject to “Approval as to Form” by the Town Attorney and “Approval as to Content” by the Town Manager.
6.3 APPROVE FINAL PARCEL MAP 20846
That the Town Council move to accept the final map Parcel Map No. 20846.
6.4 APPROVE FINAL PARCEL MAP 20847
That the Town Council move to accept the final map Parcel Map No. 20847.
6.5 APPLE VALLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT HVAC PROJECT
That the Town Council:
A. Review and approve the bid documents for the Apple Valley Sheriff’s Department HVAC Replacement Project;
B. Award a contract to Simco Mechanical, Inc., for the Apple Valley Sheriff’s Department HVAC Replacement Project subject to “Approval as to Form” by the Town Attorney and “Approval as to Content” by the Town Manager in the amount of $71,000 with a 10% contingency of $7,100, for a total amount not to exceed $78,100.
TC MINUTES MAY 27, 2025
4 6.6 ACCEPTANCE OF WORK FOR THE ROADWAY REPAIR 2025
PROJECT
That the Town Council:
A. Accept the work completed by Onyx Paving Company, Inc. as part of the Roadway Repair 2025 project for a total contract cost of $944,541.70.
B. Direct the Town Clerk to file the Notice of Completion for the contracted work.
C. Direct the Director of Finance to release the retained funds 30 days after the Notice of Completion has been filed, provided no claims are filed against the contractor.
PULLED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR
6.7 REQUEST TO ALLOW OVERHEAD POWER LINES FOR IT'S A DOG'S
LIFE PET RESORT
Approve request to allow overhead utility poles and lines to remain inplace adjacent to It’s a Dog’s Life Pet Resort, near the southeast corner of Outer Highway 18 and Yanan Road.
Tom Steeno, gave a brief presentation on the project and the need to allow the overhead powerline to remain in place.
Motion by: Mayor Pro Tem Emick
Seconded by: Council Member Cusack
To approve the Consent Calendar items numbered 6.7 as recommended.
Yes (5): Mayor Nassif, Mayor Pro Tem Emick, Council Member Bishop, Council Member Cusack, and Council Member Leon
Carried (5 to 0)
TC MINUTES MAY 27, 2025
5 7. Public Hearings
7.1 SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT TO THE 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN AND 2024-2025 ACTION PLAN
That the Town Council:
A. Conduct a public hearing and upon accepting public testimony; B. Approve a Substantial Amendment to the 2022-2026 Consolidated Plan and to the 2024-2025 Action Plan; and
C. Authorize the Town Manager, or designee, to execute and transmit all necessary documents, including the Substantial Amendment to the Action Plans, and any additional amendments, to ensure timely program expenditures.
Mayor Nassif opened the Public Hearing at 7:33 p.m.
Silvia Urenda, Special Projects Manager, presented the staff report as submitted to the Town Clerk's Office.
There being no public comments Mayor Nassif closed the Public Hearing at 7:44 p.m.
Motion by: Council Member Cusack
Seconded by: Council Member Leon
B. Approve a Substantial Amendment to the 2022-2026 Consolidated Plan and to the 2024-2025 Action Plan; and
C. Authorize the Town Manager, or designee, to execute and transmit all necessary documents, including the Substantial Amendment to the Action Plans, and any additional amendments, to ensure timely program expenditures.
Yes (5): Mayor Nassif, Mayor Pro Tem Emick, Council Member Bishop, Council Member Cusack, and Council Member Leon
Carried (5 to 0)
TC MINUTES MAY 27, 2025
6 8. Business of the Council
8.1 PRESENTATION OF THE DRAFT TOWN WIDE COMPLETE STREETS
ACTION PLAN
Receive and file.
Richard Berger, Project Manager, presented the staff report as filed with the Town Clerks office.
The Town Council thanked staff for the work that has been done on the Complete Streets Plan.
Discussion ensued surrounding Yucca Loma Road and its future improvements.
The Town Council enquired as to the grant funding used to produce the Complete Streets Plan.
This was a receive and file item only. There was no action taken.
9. Reports, Requests and Communications
10. Town Manager’s Comments & Legislative Update
Douglas Robertson, Town Manager, gave a brief legislative update and highlighted some events taking place in the Town of Apple Valley.
11. Closed Session
Motion by: Mayor Nassif
Seconded by: Council Member Bishop
To adjourn the regular meeting to move into Closed Session at 8:30 p.m. to discuss the following:
Carried
11.1 CLOSED SESSION
A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED
LITIGATION
Initiation of litigation under section 54956.9(d)(4): One Case B. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
Agency designated representatives: Mayor, Town Attorney, or designee; Unrepresented employee: Town Manager
TC MINUTES MAY 27, 2025
7 C. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT
Title: Town Manager (discussion of process)
Upon returning from Closed Session at 9:19 p.m., Thomas Rice, Town Attorney, announced that in Closed Session, the Town of Apple Valley Town Council with a motion from Council Member Bishop, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Emick, and unanimously carried, to approve Item A of the closed session calendar to initiate litigation, receivership action, for the property located at 19448 Chester Road.
12. Adjournment
Motion by: Council Member Bishop
Seconded by: Council Member Leon
To adjourn the meeting of the Apple Valley Town Council at 9:20 p.m.
Carried
________________________________
Scott Nassif, Mayor
________________________________
Kiel Mangerino, Assistant Town Clerk
Town Council Agenda Report
Date: May 27, 2025
To: Honorable Mayor and Town Council
Subject: APRIL 2025 COMMERCIAL WARRANTS AND WIRE TRANSFER
SCHEDULES
From: Douglas Robertson, Town Manager
Submitted by: Adam Cripps, Interim Assistant Director of Finance Finance Department
Budgeted Item: Yes No N/A
RECOMMENDED ACTION
That the Town Council receive, ratify, and file the Commercial Warrants and Wire Transfer Schedules as presented.
SUMMARY
Commercial warrants were issued from April 1 through April 30, 2025, in the amount of $1,572,737.21 covering issued warrant #’s 173451 – 173760. Electronic Fund Transfers were issued April 1 through April 30, 2025, in the amount $660,839.45. There were no wire transfers made from April 1 through April 30, 2025.
The claims and/or demands covered by the attached list of warrants and wire transfers were audited as to the accuracy and availability of funds for payment thereof and said claims and/or demands are accurate and the funds were available for payment thereof
BACKGROUND
Pursuant to the Town’s Municipal Code the attached demands were presented by the departments, audited by the Finance Department and subsequent warrants/wire transfers were issued. All were found to be in conformity to Town policies and procedures and funds were budgeted or available to pay said demands. List of commercial warrants and wire transfers are now being presented to Council for approval.
FISCAL IMPACT
310 Commercial Warrants were issued in the amount of $1,572,737.21 52 Electronic Fund Transfers were issued in the amount of $660,839.45 0 Wire Transfer payment was issued in the amount of $0.00
Check # Date Vendor Description Check Total
173451 04/03/2025 A&R TARPAULINS, INC Pool Cover Repairs 3,975.98 173452 04/03/2025 ABF PRINTS, INC. Required Mailings 761.55 173453 04/03/2025 ADVANTAGE COLORGRAPHICS Sponsor Brochures 419.09 173454 04/03/2025 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES IT DEPT SUPPLY STOCK 4,491.43 173455 04/03/2025 APPLE VALLEY COMMUNICATION INC ANNUAL FIRE ALARM TEST & INSP - AMC 4,915.00 173456 04/03/2025 APPLE VALLEY FEED BIN Reptile Food 51.68 173457 04/03/2025 APPLE VALLEY LAWNMOWER Sthil Chain 40.93 173458 04/03/2025 ATTEBERRY, ADRIANA Petty Cash Drawer 92.29 173459 04/03/2025 AVCOM SERVICES INC. TOAV ANSWERING SERVICE - MARCH 2025 846.80 173460 04/03/2025 BATTERY MART Town Hall Alarm Panel Batteies 156.38 173461 04/03/2025 BEAR VALLEY ANIMAL HOSPITAL S/N Services 5,297.35 173462 04/03/2025 BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC Service at 13450 Nomwaket Rd 2,414.23 173463 04/03/2025 CAL-STATE AUTO PARTS INC Vehicle Maint 63.86 173464 04/03/2025 CAPITAL ONE ASAP Craft Supplies 238.45 173465 04/03/2025 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL
DISTRIBUTORS, INC.
PW LED Lights 835.99
173466 04/03/2025 CLINE, STEVEN Tuition Reimbursement 1,360.50 173467 04/03/2025 CLUB CADDIE HOLDINGS GMS BUNDLE - APRIL 2025 750.00 173468 04/03/2025 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Department Radios - January & Parts 4,042.98 173469 04/03/2025 CREATING BRAND LEGACY New Year's Obstacle Medals 593.76 173470 04/03/2025 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION Golf Course Exterior Paint 392.45 173471 04/03/2025 EDISON COMPANY 02/21/25-03/23/25 13,092.02 173472 04/03/2025 ENDURA STEEL AVAS Kennel Repairs 5.03 173473 04/03/2025 EQUIPMENTSHARE.COM INC Lift Rental 3,294.43 173474 04/03/2025 FAUST MEDIA SERVICES, LLC Business cards 278.60 173475 04/03/2025 FEDEX SHIPPING 70.31
Town of Apple Valley
Commercial Warrants
Month of April 2025
Check # Date Vendor Description Check Total
173476 04/03/2025 FINANCIAL CREDIT NETWORK INC 02-01-25 to 02-28-25 136.57 173477 04/03/2025 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO Litigation Guarantee 1,206.00 173478 04/03/2025 G.A. OSBORNE PIPE & SUPPLY James Woody- Supplies 457.14 173479 04/03/2025 GAMETIME CCP Playground Repairs 17,722.82 173480 04/03/2025 GARDA CL WEST, INC APRIL SERVICES 1,712.82 173481 04/03/2025 GEMINI TIMING 1/2 Marathon Timing 2,947.00 173482 04/03/2025 GEOTAB USA, INC. Fleet Management - March 1,025.00 173483 04/03/2025 GT GOLF SUPPLY CO Resale Items 264.69 173484 04/03/2025 HASA INC. Pool Chemicals 2,902.81
173485 04/03/2025 HD SUPPLY, INC Liberty FL51M-2 Effluent Pumps 590.49 173486 04/03/2025 HDL SOFTWARE LLC CONTRACT SERVICES - SALES TAX (JANUARYMARCH 2025)3,664.08 173487 04/03/2025 HESPERIA OUTDOOR POWER EQUIP New Trash Cans 1,197.34 173488 04/03/2025 HIGH DESERT LASER GRAPHICS Name Badge 13.59 173489 04/03/2025 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SEVICES Truck #106 Supplies 458.45 173490 04/03/2025 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY Parks-Supplies 1,279.15 173491 04/03/2025 INTERVET, INC. Microchips 1,346.88
173492 04/03/2025 JI VEL RELIEF SERVICES VETERINARY
CORPORATION
Supervising Vet 3,200.00
173493 04/03/2025 KELLEYS UNDERGROUND CONST. INC Manhole Ring and Cover Replacements 53,960.00 173494 04/03/2025 KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS C4080 USAGE 02/25/2025-03/24/2025 457.32 173495 04/03/2025 LIBERTY UTILITIES CA 01/23/25-03/20/25 5,555.07 173496 04/03/2025 LOGICALIS CISCO HEADSET 512.24
173497 04/03/2025 LOWE'S (LAR) Truck #118, Shop & Amphitheater Supplies 2,714.89 173498 04/03/2025 MARTIN, KENNETH Retiree Reimbursement 403.28 173499 04/03/2025 MILLER, LANCE Retiree Reimbursement 179.05 173500 04/03/2025 MOBILE OCCUPATIONAL SERVICES Occupation Services Annual Query 10.00 173501 04/03/2025 MYONLINEBILL.COM MARCH SERVICES 2,296.08 173502 04/03/2025 NAPA Vehicle Maintenance # 132, 133, 134 379.72 173503 04/03/2025 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS Truck#64 Wiper Blades 9.70
Check # Date Vendor Description Check Total
173504 04/03/2025 NEM Cash Out NEM Cash Out 499.14
173505 04/03/2025 S/N Refund S/N Refund 40.00
173506 04/03/2025 PRECISION LOCK & SAFE Facilities Keys/Locks 943.47 173507 04/03/2025 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY Uniforms-Golf 171.31 173508 04/03/2025 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY Uniforms-Golf 1,137.06 173509 04/03/2025 R&R PRODUCTS Golf Course Electrical Wire 210.92 173510 04/03/2025 SAN BERNARDINO & RIVERSIDE Public Works Building Fire Service 1,060.00 173511 04/03/2025 SCP DISTRIBUTORS LLC Pool Heater Filter Replacement 2,047.21 173512 04/03/2025 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC Golf Course Maintenance Supplies 532.51 173513 04/03/2025 SOUTHWEST GAS CORPORATION 02/12/25-03/13/25 2,080.24 173514 04/03/2025 STATES AND DOOR AND HARDWARE
INC
Thunderbird Restroom Door Repairs 329.27
173515 04/03/2025 SUPERCO SPECIALTY PRODUCTS Facilities Chemicals 485.86 173516 04/03/2025 TANKNOLOGY INC. Compliance Test 3,796.73 173517 04/03/2025 THE RDI CORPORATION SHELTER PRO MARCH 2025 1,989.00 173518 04/03/2025 U.S. BANK CORP. PMT SYSTEM MARCH CALCARD 37,053.71 173519 04/03/2025 V.V.W.R.A. Final Sewer Permits - March 2025 5,848.75 173520 04/03/2025 VALLEY SECURITY SYSTEMS INC James Woody Monitoring Service 127.00 173521 04/03/2025 VELOCITY TRUCK CENTERS Vehicle Maintenance - Unit 79 5,039.91 173522 04/03/2025 VERIZON WIRELESS MONTHLY BILL 2/24 - 3/23 3,758.53 173523 04/03/2025 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY Parks Supplies 4,333.53 173524 04/03/2025 WINSUPPLY Urinal Cartridges for Town 1,721.24 173525 04/03/2025 WRIGHT, DARRYL Retiree Reimbursement 841.35 173526 04/10/2025 A & B HITCHES AND MUFFLERS Dump trailer 180.00 173527 04/10/2025 ACUSHNET COMPANY Resale Items 1,684.61 173528 04/10/2025 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC Qtr 1. Special Events Insurance Premium 1,756.00 173529 04/10/2025 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES SSP- Pickleball Nets 2,509.89 173530 04/10/2025 AMERICAN FIDELITY ASSURANCE APRIL PREMIUMS 4,842.04 173531 04/10/2025 APPLE VALLEY PORTABLES James Woody Park 1,400.03 173532 04/10/2025 ATHACO, INC MFF Decals 109.33
173533 04/10/2025 BENEFIT COORDINATORS
CORPORATION
MARCH PREMIUMS 32,938.27
Check # Date Vendor Description Check Total
173534 04/10/2025 BEST PRICE AUTO GLASS PD WINDSHIELD 680.20 173535 04/10/2025 BURRTEC WASTE IND, INC. VV Compost 47,077.60 173536 04/10/2025 BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC HHW Operations 2,644.20 173537 04/10/2025 CACEO Webinar - McCune 60.00
173538 04/10/2025 CALLAWAY GOLF SALES CO. Resale Items 804.18 173539 04/10/2025 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO County Recording 200.00 173540 04/10/2025 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO AMENDED TAX BILL 26.00 173541 04/10/2025 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Department Radios - February 3,401.34 173542 04/10/2025 DESERT VALLEY MEDICAL GROUP New Hire pre-screen physicals 511.00 173543 04/10/2025 EDISON COMPANY 05/01/21-05/31/21 NON-ENERGY BILLING 14,339.21 173544 04/10/2025 FIDELITY SECURITY LIFE INS / APRIL PREMIUMS 2,932.74 173545 04/10/2025 GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY 02/27/25-03/26/25 1,546.89 173546 04/10/2025 GT GOLF SUPPLY CO Resale Items 72.59
173547 04/10/2025 HESPERIA HOSE SUPPLY Pull Behind Aerator 515.98 173548 04/10/2025 HIGH DESERT LASER GRAPHICS METAL ENGRAVED BADGE - SIMPSON 22.30 173549 04/10/2025 HITT CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. AV Police: Bullet Proof Steel Plates 6,800.00 173550 04/10/2025 HODGSON, CARRIE ANN MARCH SERVICES 75.00 173551 04/10/2025 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SEVICES Truck #104 139.00 173552 04/10/2025 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY Parks Supplies 2,428.17 173553 04/10/2025 LIBERTY UTILITIES CA 2/26/25-3/25/25 2,937.09 173554 04/10/2025 LOWE'S (LAR) Truck #104 913.49
173555 04/10/2025 MERRELL JOHNSON GEOTECHNICAL,
INC
Bear Valley Intersection/Materials Testing 9,129.00
173556 04/10/2025 MINISZEWSKI, TASHINA Tuition reimbursement 194.00 173557 04/10/2025 MOJAVE DESERT & MOUNTAIN MRF January 2025 75,969.61 173558 04/10/2025 NAPA Small tools 87.30
173559 04/10/2025 NEW YORK LIFE APRIL PREMIUMS 1,056.14 173560 04/10/2025 FOG Permit Refund FOG Permit Refund 100.00 173561 04/10/2025 FOG Permit Refund FOG Permit Refund 100.00 173562 04/10/2025 RICHELLE E. CARLSON PROPERTY DAMAGE CLAIM SETTLEMENT 5,710.27 173563 04/10/2025 FOG Permit Refund FOG Permit Refund 100.00 173564 04/10/2025 FOG Permit Refund FOG Permit Refund 100.00
Check # Date Vendor Description Check Total
173565 04/10/2025 FOG Permit Refund FOG Permit Refund 100.00 173566 04/10/2025 WM National Services, Inc. REFUND WM PAYMENT ERROR FROM 3/6/25 705.12 173567 04/10/2025 FOG Permit Refund FOG Permit Refund 100.00 173568 04/10/2025 PEDERSEN, RICHARD 1/2 Marathon Awards & Photo Prop 598.50 173569 04/10/2025 PERSONAL PROTECTION
CONSULTANTS, INC
Training Materials 96.75
173570 04/10/2025 PRESTIGE FLAG MFG. CO INC GC Maintenance 75.02 173571 04/10/2025 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY Uniform Service 393.21 173572 04/10/2025 R&R PRODUCTS Golf Course Maintenance 897.14 173573 04/10/2025 RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSPLANNERS, INC.Quimby Pickleball/Sports Pav. Concept 7,000.00 173574 04/10/2025 RIGHT OF WAY, INC Vehicles #132, #133 & #134 335.91 173575 04/10/2025 ROTARY CLUB OF APPLE VALLEY QUARTERLY DUES 217.50 173576 04/10/2025 SAN BERNARDINO FIRE PROT. DIST Annual Hazardous Materials CUPA Permit - PW Yard
919.00
173577 04/10/2025 STATE OF CALIFORNIA- D.O.J. FINGERPRINTS 1,912.00 173578 04/10/2025 STERICYCLE REGULAR SERVICE OFF-SITE 165.66 173579 04/10/2025 STOTZ EQUIPMENT John Deer Tractor Parts 131.48 173580 04/10/2025 STOVER SEED COMPANY Thunderbird- Grass Seed 7,240.80 173581 04/10/2025 TEXAS LIFE INSURANCE CO. MARCH PREMIUMS 1,253.52 173582 04/10/2025 THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO PD TIRES 1,662.86 173583 04/10/2025 TOPS N BARRICADES, INC Replacement temporary traffic control signs 439.62 173584 04/10/2025 TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY APRIL SEWER 3,935.83 173585 04/10/2025 TURF STAR INC. Equipment Maintenance 2,547.91 173586 04/10/2025 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT OF
SO. CALIFORNIA
Dig Alert & March Monthly Service 337.45
173587 04/10/2025 VOYAGER MARCH FUEL PURCHASES 15,261.68 173588 04/10/2025 WANG, YIJIA MARCH SERVICES 13,150.00
173589 04/17/2025 ALL GOOD DRIVING SCHOOL, INC. Online Drivers Ed Instructor Pay 106.40 173590 04/17/2025 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES Dog Waste Receptacles 3,200.33 173591 04/17/2025 AMERICAN COMPUTER SERVICE STATEMENTS/POSTAGE 12,808.42
Check # Date Vendor Description Check Total
173592 04/17/2025 AMERICAN RED CROSS Lifeguard Course 448.00 173593 04/17/2025 ANIMAL CARE HOSPITAL Spay/Neuter Services 75.00 173594 04/17/2025 ANIMAL EMERGENCY CLINIC Medical Treatment 350.00 173595 04/17/2025 APPLE VALLEY ANIMAL HOSPITAL Spay/Neuter Services 75.00 173596 04/17/2025 APPLE VALLEY FEED BIN Fish Food 8.69
173597 04/17/2025 APPLE VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL Sponsorship AVUSD Track 1,000.00 173598 04/17/2025 APPLE VALLEY LAWNMOWER Parks-Edger Blades and Mix Gas Oil 60.92 173599 04/17/2025 APPLE VALLEY PORTABLES Lyons Park 2,400.02 173600 04/17/2025 APPLE VALLEY PRINTING #10 WINDOW & #9 REGULAR ENVELOPES 1,307.00 173601 04/17/2025 APPLE VALLEY TIRE Tire Repair 60.00
173602 04/17/2025 AVHS FOOTBALL BOSTER CLUB AVHS Football Sponsorship 1,000.00 173603 04/17/2025 BALL HAWK Golf Balls 600.00
173604 04/17/2025 BEAR VALLEY ANIMAL HOSPITAL Spay/Neuter Services 6,358.69 173605 04/17/2025 BOOT BARN INC Uniform Boots-Bryan Austin 166.38 173606 04/17/2025 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES Landscape Maintenance Services - March 2025 20,324.34 173607 04/17/2025 CAPITAL ONE ASAP Supplies 395.25
173608 04/17/2025 CAROLLO ENGINEERS, INC. Sewer System Master Plan Update - March 2025 22,210.00 173609 04/17/2025 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Lien Release 80.00 173610 04/17/2025 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER Water Service 136.57 173611 04/17/2025 DANIELS DEEP TINE LLC Aerating of Golf Course 2,506.00 173612 04/17/2025 DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC BULK LAPTOP PURCHASE 29,671.09 173613 04/17/2025 DELL MARKETING L.P. USB-C 130 W AC ADAPTERS 945.74 173614 04/17/2025 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION Town Hall Wall Paint 324.73 173615 04/17/2025 EDISON COMPANY 03/11/25-04/08/25 5,539.95 173616 04/17/2025 FEDEX SHIPPING 87.34
173617 04/17/2025 FEED MY SHEEP Feed my Sheep 3rd Qtr 4,273.60 173618 04/17/2025 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLY BILL - APRIL 2025 4,000.25 173619 04/17/2025 G.A. OSBORNE PIPE & SUPPLY Parks Supplies 1,826.72 173620 04/17/2025 GARDA CL WEST, INC MARCH EXCESS CHARGES 50.45 173621 04/17/2025 GEISEL, PATRICK Spring Volleyball Official Pay 75.00 173622 04/17/2025 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO Maintenance - RX SP Connector 1,030.79
Check # Date Vendor Description Check Total
173623 04/17/2025 HIGH DESERT JUNIOR GOLF
ACADEMY
Golf Lessons Instructor Pay 1,061.25
173624 04/17/2025 HIGH DESERT LASER GRAPHICS TOAV Stamps for Passports 90.26 173625 04/17/2025 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SEVICES Golf Course Paint Supplies 22.78 173626 04/17/2025 IDEXX DISTRIBUTION, INC Shelter Meds/test 575.06 173627 04/17/2025 JOHNSON CONTROLS Golf Course Chiller Repairs 1,433.50 173628 04/17/2025 KIMBALL MIDWEST Marking Paint 672.10
173629 04/17/2025 KONICA MINOLTA FLEET - NEW - 04/22/2025 8,360.67 173630 04/17/2025 LIBERTY UTILITIES CA 02/07/25-04/03/25 1,101.49 173631 04/17/2025 LOWE'S (LAR) G.C Mechanic Shop Air Compressor 328.78 173632 04/17/2025 MIRACLE RECREATION EQUIPMENT Norm Schmidt Park Mainteneance 1,781.31 173633 04/17/2025 NAPA Parks-Tractor Safety 371.31
173634 04/17/2025 NIX, PATRICIA Line Dancing Instructor Pay 168.00 173635 04/17/2025 PERMIT REFUND PERMIT REFUND 128.95
173636 04/17/2025 PERMIT REFUND PERMIT REFUND 225.98
173637 04/17/2025 S/N REFUND S/N REFUND 150.00
173638 04/17/2025 ADOPTION REFUND ADOPTION REFUND 121.00 173639 04/17/2025 Justin Island Boot Reimbursemnet 200.00 173640 04/17/2025 S/N REFUND S/N REFUND 40.00
173641 04/17/2025 S/N REFUND S/N REFUND 620.00
173642 04/17/2025 The Pin Center 2025 Fast & Furrious Pins 520.00 173643 04/17/2025 Timothy Visosky Gas Reimbursement 135.00 173644 04/17/2025 OUTWEST JERKY LLC Resale Items 333.50 173645 04/17/2025 PARS JANUARY FEES 549.28
173646 04/17/2025 PRECISION LOCK & SAFE Thunderbird Park Lock 196.75 173647 04/17/2025 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY Uniform service 413.61 173648 04/17/2025 R&R PRODUCTS Golf Course Maintenance-Rope 379.99 173649 04/17/2025 RIGHT OF WAY, INC Adopt a street stickers 26.94 173650 04/17/2025 RSG, INC FY24-25 SA SERVICES & CB RECONCILIATION 1,512.50 173651 04/17/2025 SAN BERNARDINO & RIVERSIDE Fire Protection & Safety Services- PW Vehicles 1,062.11
Check # Date Vendor Description Check Total
173652 04/17/2025 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFF'S
DEPARTMENT
Village Parade OT 1,779.30
173653 04/17/2025 SCMAF Contract Class Insurance-March 2025 455.00 173654 04/17/2025 SOUTHWEST GAS CORPORATION 03/11/25-04/08/25 154.83 173655 04/17/2025 SPARKLETTS WATER 52.75
173656 04/17/2025 ST. FRANCIS ELECTRIC, LLC New Battery Backup System - Central & Esaws 16,944.64 173657 04/17/2025 STATE OF CALIFORNIA- D.O.J. FINGERPRINTS 777.00 173658 04/17/2025 STILES ANIMAL REMOVAL, INC. Disposal Services for April 5,490.00 173659 04/17/2025 TAYLOR, SHARI Baton Class Instructor Pay 189.90 173660 04/17/2025 THE GREATER HIGH DESERT Leaderhsip HD 2,800.00 173661 04/17/2025 TREE PROS Corwin Park Tree Removal 2,900.00 173662 04/17/2025 TURF STAR INC. Golf Course Maintenance 1,669.39 173663 04/17/2025 V.V.W.R.A. Sewage Treatment - March 2025 389,654.07 173664 04/17/2025 VARGAS, RICHARD Spring Volleyball Official Pay 75.00 173665 04/17/2025 VELOCITY TRUCK CENTERS Vehicle Maintenance - Unit 93 2,945.05 173666 04/17/2025 VERDE DESIGN, INC EDEN PO 2324-000009 21,685.20 173667 04/17/2025 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY Facilities Supplies 1,640.53 173668 04/17/2025 WILBUR-ELLIS COMPANY LLC Grounds Maint. 627.59 173669 04/17/2025 WPONCALL WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 300.00
173670 04/17/2025 YHBJ GROUP INC Public Works Window Tint 1,305.00 173671 04/17/2025 NEM CASH OUT NEM CASH OUT 276.89
173672 04/17/2025 NEM CASH OUT NEM CASH OUT 27.25
173673 04/17/2025 NEM CASH OUT NEM CASH OUT 25.09
173674 04/17/2025 NEM CASH OUT NEM CASH OUT 69.51
173675 04/17/2025 NEM CASH OUT NEM CASH OUT 175.75
173676 04/17/2025 NEM CASH OUT NEM CASH OUT 4.49
173677 04/17/2025 NEM CASH OUT NEM CASH OUT 169.57
173678 04/17/2025 NEM CASH OUT NEM CASH OUT 118.73
173679 04/17/2025 NEM CASH OUT NEM CASH OUT 612.74
173680 04/17/2025 NEM CASH OUT NEM CASH OUT 343.67
173681 04/17/2025 NEM CASH OUT NEM CASH OUT 155.39
173682 04/17/2025 NEM CASH OUT NEM CASH OUT 11.45
Check # Date Vendor Description Check Total
173683 04/17/2025 NEM CASH OUT NEM CASH OUT 288.64
173684 04/17/2025 NEM CASH OUT NEM CASH OUT 170.24
173685 04/17/2025 NEM CASH OUT NEM CASH OUT 133.20
173686 04/17/2025 NEM CASH OUT NEM CASH OUT 62.41
173687 04/17/2025 NEM CASH OUT NEM CASH OUT 202.03
173688 04/17/2025 NEM CASH OUT NEM CASH OUT 268.08
173689 04/17/2025 NEM CASH OUT NEM CASH OUT 2.87
173690 04/17/2025 NEM CASH OUT NEM CASH OUT 67.00
173691 04/17/2025 NEM CASH OUT NEM CASH OUT 208.35
173692 04/17/2025 NEM CASH OUT NEM CASH OUT 383.63
173693 04/17/2025 NEM CASH OUT NEM CASH OUT 124.02
173694 04/17/2025 NEM CASH OUT NEM CASH OUT 18.18
173695 04/17/2025 NEM CASH OUT NEM CASH OUT 194.59
173696 04/17/2025 NEM CASH OUT NEM CASH OUT 200.80
173697 04/17/2025 NEM CASH OUT NEM CASH OUT 31.97
173698 04/17/2025 NEM CASH OUT NEM CASH OUT 105.47
173699 04/17/2025 NEM CASH OUT NEM CASH OUT 11.32
173700 04/24/2025 ABF PRINTS, INC. REQUIRED MAILING 861.24 173701 04/24/2025 ALBERTSONS LLC ASAP 71.92
173702 04/24/2025 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES ASAP Supplies 621.02 173703 04/24/2025 AMERICAN COMPUTER SERVICE LIEN LETTERS/POSTAGE 871.32 173704 04/24/2025 AMERICAN RED CROSS Lifeguard Training-Landon Lugo 1,008.00 173705 04/24/2025 ANIMAL HEALTH & SANITARY SUP. Maint. Supplies 2,190.50 173706 04/24/2025 APPLE VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL
DISTRICT
FINES AND FORFEITURES FEBRUARY 2025 47.02
173707 04/24/2025 BEAR VALLEY ANIMAL HOSPITAL Spay/Neuter Services 4,103.86 173708 04/24/2025 BECK OIL INC. Golf Course Fuel 2,515.11 173709 04/24/2025 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TAX ELECTRICAL ENERGY TAX 1/01/25-3/31/25 14,013.00 173710 04/24/2025 CALLAWAY GOLF SALES CO. resale items 147.06 173711 04/24/2025 CAPITAL ONE JPIA Mandatory Reporter Training snacks 347.85 173712 04/24/2025 CAR WASH PARTNERS, LLC MARCH WASH SERVICES 432.00
Check # Date Vendor Description Check Total
173713 04/24/2025 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL
DISTRIBUTORS, INC.
Brewster Field #7 Breaker 1,141.88
173714 04/24/2025 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL
DISTRIBUTORS, INC.
Theater #12 LED Lights 440.44
173715 04/24/2025 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Acc 1046 3-1-25 to 4-14-25 127,496.79 173716 04/24/2025 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION Town Hall Paint 162.36 173717 04/24/2025 EDISON COMPANY 03/01/25-03/31/25 58,621.20 173718 04/24/2025 ENDURA STEEL Truck #113 Supplies 27.17 173719 04/24/2025 EQUIPMENTSHARE.COM INC James Woody Lift Rental 2,328.45 173720 04/24/2025 FARMER BROTHERS COFFEE COFFEE 513.44
173721 04/24/2025 FINANCIAL CREDIT NETWORK INC 03-01-25 to 03/31/25 136.57 173722 04/24/2025 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO Litigation Guarantee 1,526.00 173723 04/24/2025 G.A. OSBORNE PIPE & SUPPLY Parks- Maintenance Supplies 525.97 173724 04/24/2025 GRAINGER, INC. HVAC Filters 3,050.66
173725 04/24/2025 GRIDPOINT, INC. Singh Center HVAC Controller 9,904.00 173726 04/24/2025 HASA INC. Pool Chemicals 2,098.89
173727 04/24/2025 HIGH DESERT LASER GRAPHICS METAL ENGRAVED BADGE 57.10 173728 04/24/2025 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SEVICES Custodian Vacuum Supplies 581.13 173729 04/24/2025 JI VEL RELIEF SERVICES VETERINARY
CORPORATION
Supervising Vet Services 3,200.00
173730 04/24/2025 JOHNSON, RAFORD Spring Volleyball Officials Pay 100.00 173731 04/24/2025 KIMBALL MIDWEST Small Tools/Vehicle Maintenance 890.75 173732 04/24/2025 LIBERTY UTILITIES CA 02/07/25-04/03/25 21,138.47 173733 04/24/2025 LOWE'S (LAR) Facilities Paint Supplies 1,843.39 173734 04/24/2025 MOJAVE BASIN AREA WATERMASTER 2nd Quarter Water Production Report - Wells 299.23 173735 04/24/2025 MOJAVE PAINT & BODY PD VEHICLE REPAIR 1,948.57 173736 04/24/2025 MWI ANIMAL HEALTH Shelter Meds 849.81 173737 04/24/2025 NAPA Shop Supplies 193.69
173738 04/24/2025 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS Truck #113 Supplies 17.38 173739 04/24/2025 S/N Refund S/N Refund 375.00
173740 04/24/2025 Adan Arciniega Mileage Reimbursement 413.00
Check # Date Vendor Description Check Total
173741 04/24/2025 S/N Refund S/N Refund 75.00
173742 04/24/2025 S/N Refund S/N Refund 40.00
173743 04/24/2025 S/N Refund S/N Refund 40.00
173744 04/24/2025 S/N Refund S/N Refund 225.00
173745 04/24/2025 S/N Refund S/N Refund 75.00
173746 04/24/2025 S/N Refund S/N Refund 75.00
173747 04/24/2025 PARS FEBRUARY FEES 557.80
173748 04/24/2025 PNC EQUIPMENT FINANCE Leased Equipment 10,529.35 173749 04/24/2025 RIGHT OF WAY, INC Signage 983.22
173750 04/24/2025 REGISTRAR OF VOTERS SAN BERNA ELECTION SERVICES 153,304.00 173751 04/24/2025 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFF'S
DEPARTMENT
Reverse Tri-PD 1,581.60
173752 04/24/2025 SCP DISTRIBUTORS LLC Willie Repairs 110.09 173753 04/24/2025 SMART & FINAL ASAP Snacks 613.34
173754 04/24/2025 SOUTHWEST GAS CORPORATION 03/11/25-04/08/25 11,559.82 173755 04/24/2025 SUPERCO SPECIALTY PRODUCTS Graffiti Remover 296.39 173756 04/24/2025 TURF STAR INC. Golf Course-Gear Motor 2,764.00 173757 04/24/2025 VALLEY SECURITY SYSTEMS INC James Woody Monitoring Service 127.00 173758 04/24/2025 VARGAS, RICHARD Spring Volleyball Officials Pay 50.00 173759 04/24/2025 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY P.D. Custodian Supplies 4,734.34 173760 04/24/2025 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Hazardous Waste Services 1,191.21 310 Checks Total amount of checks: 1,572,737.21
Check # Date Vendor Description Check Total
726 04/03/2025 AGILEBITS INC ANNUAL LICENSE RENEWAL 575.28 727 04/03/2025 BATTISTA, RICHARD Graffiti Removal 2,818.50 728 04/03/2025 CADY, MICHAEL Retiree Reimbursement 379.97 729 04/03/2025 CRON, DENNIS Retiree Reimbursement 451.70 730 04/03/2025 CUPP, PAMELA Retiree Reimbursement 1,270.36 731 04/03/2025 HARROWER, KATHY Retiree Reimbursement 619.60 732 04/03/2025 KELLEY, KAREN Retiree Reimbursement 619.60 733 04/03/2025 LAMSON, LORI Retiree Reimbursement 1,443.99 734 04/03/2025 MCKEON, TOM Retiree Reimbursement 203.99 735 04/03/2025 MILLER, CAROL Retiree Reimbursement 478.29 736 04/03/2025 MOLINARI, MICHAEL Retiree Reimbursement 800.00 737 04/03/2025 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, LLC DSB Work Center Paper and Supplies 447.68 738 04/03/2025 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY Uniforms-Facilities 151.29 739 04/03/2025 SCHMACHTENBERGER, KATHERINE M Retiree Reimbursement 575.82 740 04/03/2025 SIMMONS, DAWN Retiree Reimbursement 631.31 741 04/03/2025 SMITH, KEVIN Retiree Reimbursement 399.94 742 04/03/2025 SULZBERGER, DIANNE Retiree Reimbursement 619.60 743 04/03/2025 TYPE-SET-GO Spring Youth Volleyball Jersey's 2,577.95 744 04/03/2025 VULCAN MATERIALS Cold mix 1,938.25
745 04/03/2025 WHITESIDE, GINA M Retiree Reimbursement 1,650.80 746 04/10/2025 CALIFORNIA JPIA ADA SURVEY/INSPECTION 15,600.00 747 04/10/2025 FEHR & PEERS Apple Valley Circulation Element 3,260.00 748 04/10/2025 GOVINVEST INC. ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION FEE 4/29/24-4/28/27 15,933.33 749 04/10/2025 QUADIENT FINANCE USA, INC POSTAGE 5,549.00 750 04/10/2025 SAXBY ENTERPRISES INC Bunny Run T-shirts 801.00 751 04/10/2025 VULCAN MATERIALS Cold Mix 911.57
Town of Apple Valley
Commercial Warrants
Month of April 2025
Electronic Fund Transfers
Check # Date Vendor Description Check Total
752 04/17/2025 BATTISTA, RICHARD Graffiti Removal 1,608.00 753 04/17/2025 CARROLL, MARY ANNE Yoga Fit Class Instructor Pay 237.60 754 04/17/2025 DIAMOND CONSTRUCTION 1st Disbursement - Abel 22,400.00 755 04/17/2025 GARCIA, NEIL Guitar Lessons Instructor Pay 255.30 756 04/17/2025 GREINES, MARTIN, STEIN & RICHLAND LLP TOAV v. AV RANCHOS WATER CORP. 17,805.00 757 04/17/2025 J. ALLISON CONSTRUCTION Temple- Disbursement #1 21,000.00 758 04/17/2025 KNC CONSTRUCTION Village North Sidewalk Improvement Project 408,275.09 759 04/17/2025 MOCHARNUK, BILL Tennis Class Instructor Pay 247.98 760 04/17/2025 MURO, MARIA Aqua Zumba Class Instructor Pay 886.86 761 04/17/2025 MYERS, MELANIE Acting Class Instructor Pay 1,488.00 762 04/17/2025 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, LLC OFFICE SUPPLIES 256.37 763 04/17/2025 RICHLING, HAILEY Tap & Ballet Class Instructor Pay 944.78 764 04/17/2025 SAXBY ENTERPRISES INC Community Clean Up Day Shirts 2,457.50 765 04/17/2025 TYPE-SET-GO Spring Youth Volleyball Jerseys 40.12 766 04/17/2025 URBAN FUTURES INC DISCLOSURE AND COMPLIANCE SERVICES - FY24 REPORT
9,975.00
767 04/17/2025 URMSTON, CHRIS Tai Chi Instructor Pay 622.80 768 04/17/2025 VULCAN MATERIALS Cold mix 1,955.39
769 04/24/2025 BIG APPLE AUTO VEHICLE REPAIR 13,456.65
770 04/24/2025 CALES, BRANDON PER DIEM FOR 3 DAYS 140.00 771 04/24/2025 CALES, BRANDON PER DIEM - 2 DAYS 210.00
772 04/24/2025 CALES, BRANDON PER DIEM - 5 DAYS 350.00
773 04/24/2025 JASON CHAIDEZ Grounds Maint. 1,900.00
774 04/24/2025 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY Uniforms-Facilites 834.09 775 04/24/2025 QUADIENT FINANCE USA, INC PD POSTAGE 98.00 776 04/24/2025 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 02/1/2024-12/31/24 POWER VA SALES 91,388.00 777 04/24/2025 VULCAN MATERIALS Cold Mix 1,298.10
52 EFT'S Total amount of EFT's: $660,839.45
Town Council Agenda Report
Date: May 27, 2025
To: Honorable Mayor and Town Council
Subject: APRIL 2025 PAYROLL/BENEFITS WARRANTS SCHEDULE
From: Douglas Robertson, Town Manager
Submitted by: Adam Cripps, Interim Assistant Director of Finance Finance Department
Budgeted Item: Yes No N/A
RECOMMENDED ACTION
That the Town Council receive, ratify and file the payroll/benefits warrants as presented.
BACKGROUND
Per Section 3.16.040 through 3.18.030 of the Town of Apple Valley Municipal Code, except for tort claims, every claim and demand received against the Town shall be presented to, approved in writing by the receiving department or office, certified to the delivery or rendition of the supplies, materials, property or service for which payment is claimed, and that the quality and prices correspond with the original specifications and contracts.
SUMMARY
Pursuant to the Town’s Municipal Code, the register of demands shall be presented to the Town Council at the next regular meeting thereof after preparation. The Town Council may approve, conditionally or partially approve or reject such register of demands and in connection therewith consider the recommendations of the Town Manager and Director of Finance. Further, the State Government Code provides that Staff may process and pay prior to ratification by the Town Council, demands properly made in the ordinary course of business, the just obligations of the Town, such as routine salaries and wages, and other like expenditures for which there is an express budget appropriation, and in connection with which there is no dispute as to the obligation and amount being payable.
The Payroll / Benefits warrants issued from April 1 through April 30, 2025, in the amount of $1,027,643.60 net of voids, covering issued warrant #s 72129-72152 and direct deposit advice #s 1001904-1002399 are herewith submitted for approval.
FISCAL IMPACT
DATE TOTAL
04/11/2025 $504,767.00
04/25/2025 $522,876.60
TOTAL: $1,027,643.60
The payroll and benefit warrants issued, covering warrant #s 72129-72152 and direct deposit advice #s 1001904-1002399 inclusive, totaled $1,027,643.60. Sufficient funding is appropriated and available in such amounts necessary to cover the demands included herein.
Town Council Agenda Report
Date: May 27, 2025
To: Honorable Mayor and Town Council
Subject: PURCHASE OF ADDITIONAL VERKADA SECURITY CAMERAS,
ACCESS CONTROL AND IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES FOR THE
SINGH CENTER
From: Douglas Robertson, Town Manager
Submitted by: Brandon Cales, Director Innovation and Technology Innovation and Technology Department
Budgeted Item: Yes No N/A
RECOMMENDED ACTION
That Council authorize the purchase of additional security cameras, access control system and implementation services for the Town’s existing Verkada solution at the Singh Center for the Arts, from Matrix Audio Visual Designs, Inc. in the amount of $104,858.88, and authorize the Town Manager or designee to execute appropriate agreements and documentation
BACKGROUND
This purchase will provide a number of camera additions at the Singh Center for the Arts.
The security camera system for Town facilities was first implemented in fiscal year 2021- 2022, to replace equipment that did not meet requirements and was failing to a point of inoperability. The Department of Innovation and Technology has standardized on camera and physical security systems from Verkada, which provides a unified platform at all Town facilities. In subsequent fiscal years, additional cameras will continue to be added to adequately provide necessary coverage for the protection of Town facilities and assets.
The Verkada solution provides the latest physical security and security camera technology that is smart, secure and easy to manage.
This purchase follows competitive pricing through the California Multiple Award Schedule (CMAS) cooperative agreement 3-20-11-0100A and allows the Town of Apple Valley to take advantage of the purchasing power made available to government agencies under the Public Contract Code (PCC) § 10298 and 10299 which authorizes local government agencies to use CMAS and other Department of General Services (DGS) agreements without competitive bidding. This also complies with the Town’s Municipal Code provisions permitting piggybacking on other local government contracts that were competitively bid.
FISCAL IMPACT
This is budgeted under the Innovation and Technology Department and Singh Center fund accounts in the FY 2024-25 budget, as adopted by Town Council.
Funding consists of $62,000.00 from the Sing Center Fund 59101901, with the remaining from IT General Fund 10011901.
ATTACHMENTS
A Proposal for Audio Visual System
B CMAS Agreement 3-20-11-0100A
ToAV - Theater Surveillance Additional camera
and Access Control 3 doors
PROJECT INFORMATION:
Revision:
5/7/2025
0 Modified: T e c h n o l o g y . S e r v i c e . S o l u t i o n s ® PREPARED FOR:
Town of Apple Valley
Project Name: Brandon Cales
Project Site Address:
22311 Bear Valley Rd bldg a,
Apple Valley, CA 92308
Project Number: P001658
Date: 05/07/2025
Expires: 06/30/2025
CMAS: 3-23-01-1017
Accounts Payable
14975 Dale Evans Pkwy
Apple Valley CA 93207
1. Outdoor Cameras and Cabling
• Furnish and install two (2) outdoor cameras to cover designated blind spots around the building exterior. • Provide all necessary cabling for camera connectivity.
2. Indoor Hallway Cameras (First Floor)
• Furnish and install two (2) indoor cameras to provide coverage of the first-floor hallway. • All cabling included.
3. Lobby Cameras
• Furnish and install two (2) indoor cameras to enhance coverage and visibility of the lobby area. • Include all required cabling.
4. Theater Room Cameras
• Furnish and install two (2) indoor cameras in the theater room to ensure comprehensive monitoring. • Provide and install all necessary cabling.
5. Access Control – Server Rooms
• Furnish and install two (2) 4-door access control panels (one in each server room). • Provide and install all required cabling.
6. Access Control and Keypad Entry
• Provide access control system and keypad entry for both server rooms and one main building entry door. • Installation and cabling included.
7. Encrypted Access Cards
• Provide one hundred (100) encrypted access cards for use with the access control system.
8. Mobile Access Licensing
• Provide license for twenty (20) users to utilize phone-based NFC access (mobile credentials).
9. Network Infrastructure
• Furnish and install two (2) PoE++ network switches (one in each server room) to support cameras and access control equipment.
• All network cabling included.
10. 5 year license for all access control and additional cameras.
11. Replace the alarm keypad.
12. Add 2 horn speakers for talk back with 5 year license.
13. Alarm capacity 5 year license.
Note:
- After Hours and Shift Work: Please note that this proposal is based on work performed during regular hours (straight time) and does not include after-hours, shift work, or weekend work. If such services are required, they will be subject to additional charges, which will be specified and agreed upon in a separate agreement or contract.
- Prevailing Wage: Please note that this proposal does not include prevailing wage rates. If such rates are required, they will be determined by the applicable laws and regulations, and any additional costs associated with them will be specified and agreed upon in a separate agreement or contract.
- Cabling: The proposal includes comprehensive cabling services, including cable selection, installation, termination, and testing to ensure optimal system performance.
- Note: Electrical and conduit is not included in this proposal. - IT will provide the necessary network related equipment for a turn key solution. - Concrete coring by others.
PRICING
Main Total $1,440.00 *
Main: Perimeter Total $10,679.10 *
Main
Equipment rental: Rental of lifts to assist with installation for 1 $1,440.00 week
1 $1,440.00
Main: Perimeter
2000 $0.74 $1,480.00
1 $1,600.00 $1,600.00
2 $74.25 $148.50
2 $80.93 $161.86
2 $230.35 $460.70
2 $2,746.51 $5,493.02
$1,335.02
Category 6 F/UTP EN series 23 AWG 4 pair shielded cable - Blue
Door hardware and installation
AD34 Single Gang Anodized Aluminum Backplate
Circle Junction Box
Door Reader LF, HF, NFC, BT, No Keypad
Outdoor Dome Camera Fixed 5MP, 2TB, 365 Days Max
2 5 Year Camera License $667.51
Main: IDF
400 $0.68 $272.00
1 $1,600.00 $1,600.00
$24.60
Category 6 F/UTP EN series 23 AWG 4 pair shielded cable - Blue
Door hardware and installation
5 Category 6 KMJ unshielded modular jacks blue $4.92
1 AD34 Single Gang Anodized Aluminum Backplate
Verkada ACC-AD-BP
$66.00
Main: IDF Total $14,562.51 *
1 $808.65 $808.65
1 $1,335.76 $1,335.76
1 $74.25 $74.25
1 $131.33 $131.33
1 $197.32 $197.32
$296.35
Professional-grade, Layer 3 Etherlighting™ switch with (2) 10 GbE PoE++, (22) 2.5 GbE PoE++, and (4) 10G SFP+ ports
4 Door Controller - Cloud-based access control
AD34 Single Gang Anodized Aluminum Backplate
Provide backup power for a Verkada alarm system with
advanced LiFePO4 battery packs
Dual Battery Enclosure
1 Door Reader LF, HF, NFC, BT, No Keypad $296.35 *
1 $307.23 $307.23
3 $593.36 $1,780.08
3 $527.36 $1,582.08
2 $188.93 $377.86
$5,775.00
Arm and disarm your site, connect wireless sensors, and view sensor activity -- all from a single device
Horn Speaker Cloud-managed talk-down speaker for intrusion deterrence.
Horn Speaker talk-down speaker
5 Year Door License
Advanced Video Alarms: includes professional monitoring with video verification for unlimited sensors and 15 alarm-triggering cameras. 5 year License capacity increase
1 $5,775.00
Main: MDF
1 $1,600.00 $1,600.00
5 $4.92 $24.60
1 $808.65 $808.65
1 $1,335.76 $1,335.76
1 $74.25 $74.25
$131.33
Door hardware and installation
Category 6 KMJ unshielded modular jacks blue
Professional-grade, Layer 3 Etherlighting™ switch with (2) 10 GbE PoE++, (22) 2.5 GbE PoE++, and (4) 10G SFP+ ports
4 Door Controller - Cloud-based access control
AD34 Single Gang Anodized Aluminum Backplate
Provide backup power for a Verkada alarm system with
advanced LiFePO4 battery packs
1 $131.33
1 AD34 Single Gang Anodized Aluminum Backplate
Verkada ACC-AD-BP
$66.00
Main: MDF Total $4,846.12 *
Main: Hallway Total $6,888.30 *
Main: Lobby Total $7,168.04 *
Main: Access Control Total $1,335.76 *
Main: Theater room Total $6,888.30 *
1 $197.32 $197.32
$296.35
Dual Battery Enclosure
1 Door Reader LF, HF, NFC, BT, No Keypad $296.35 *
2 5 Year Door License $188.93 $377.86
Main: Hallway
200 $0.68 $136.00
2 $110.63 $221.26
2 $2,598.01 $5,196.02
$1,335.02
Category 6 F/UTP EN series 23 AWG 4 pair shielded cable - Blue
Recess Ceiling Mount
Indoor Dome Camera Fixed 5MP, 2TB, 365 Days Max
5 Year Camera License
2 $667.51
Main: Lobby
500 $0.68 $340.00
2 $2,746.51 $5,493.02
$1,335.02
Category 6 F/UTP EN series 23 AWG 4 pair shielded cable - Blue
Indoor Dome Camera 5 MP Zoom , 2TB, 365 Days Max
2 5 Year Camera License $667.51
Main: Access Control
1 $593.26 $593.26
$742.50
High Frequency Smartcard
1 Add up to 20 users with a mobile NFC credential for 5 years, $742.50 Main: Theater room
200 $0.68 $136.00
2 $110.63 $221.26
2 $2,598.01 $5,196.02
$1,335.02
Category 6 F/UTP EN series 23 AWG 4 pair shielded cable - Blue
Recess Ceiling Mount
Indoor Dome Camera Fixed 5MP, 2TB, 365 Days Max
2 5 Year Camera License $667.51
* Subtotals do not include Tax, Shipping and Misc. charges. Refer to project summary Page 39 of 184 Date
Town of Apple Valley
Date
Client: Contractor: Matrix Audio Visual Designs, Inc.
CSLB #: 765990
Town of Apple Valley
Name:
Armen Aghazaryan
Name:
Equipment: $53,808.13
Project Summary
Miscellaneous: $3,228.58
Sales Tax: $3,384.17
Shipping: $807.00
Labor: $43,631.00
Sales tax is calculated based on the current sales tax and it is subject to change Grand Total: $104,858.88
Payment Schedule Amount
Inital Deposit $47,186.50
Progress Payment - 50% progress $26,214.72
Progress Payment - 80% progress $26,214.72
Final Payment $5,242.94
Procurement Division
707 Third Street, 2nd Floor, MS #2-202
West Sacramento, CA 95605-2811
State of California
MULTIPLE AWARD SCHEDULE
NON-MANDATORY
Verkada Inc. Categories Information CMAS NUMBER: 3-23-01-1017 SUPPLEMENT NUMBER: 13
CMAS TERM DATES: 01/09/2023 through 12/31/2025
EFFECTIVE DATE: 01/18/2024
CMAS CATEGORY: Information Technology Goods and Services
APPLICABLE CMAS
TERMS & CONDITIONS: March 1, 2023
MAXIMUM ORDER LIMIT:
State Agencies: See Purchasing Authority
Dollar Threshold provision
Local Government Agencies: Unlimited
FOR USE BY: State & Local Government Agencies
BASE PEPPM #: 535122-190
BASE PEPPM HOLDER: Verkada, Inc.
PROGRAM ANALYST
John Dickinson
[email protected]
This California Multiple Award Schedule (CMAS) provides for the purchase, warranty, and installation of cloud-based video surveillance systems. (See page 3 for the restrictions applicable to this CMAS.)
The purpose of this supplement is to incorporate the following change:
Add “COA Associates LLC” to the list of Authorized Resellers. See pages 21 through 25 for the revised list of Authorized Resellers for this CMAS.
The most current Ordering Instructions and Special Provisions, CMAS Terms and Conditions, products and/or services are included herein. All purchase orders issued by State agencies shall incorporate these Ordering Instructions and Special Provisions and CMAS Terms and Conditions.
Review these provisions carefully as they have changed.
Supplement 13 replaces the original CMAS and the previous supplements in their entirety.
CALIFORNIA MULTIPLE AWARD SCHEDULE (CMAS)
VERKADA INC.
CMAS NUMBER 3-23-01-1017, SUPPLEMENT NUMBER 13
October 4, 2023 Ordering Instructions and Special Provisions 2 NOTICE: Products and/or services on this CMAS may be available on a Mandatory State Contract.
If this is the case, the use of this CMAS is restricted unless the State agency has an approved exemption as explained in the State Contract User Instructions. Information regarding State Contracts can be obtained at the: State Contracts Index Listing. This requirement is not applicable to local government agencies.
Any reference to a specific manufacturer’s or publisher’s warranty or terms and conditions as shown in the base contract are not applicable to this CMAS.
The services provided under this CMAS are only available in support of the products covered by this CMAS.
Agency non-compliance with the requirements may result in the loss of CMAS program delegated purchasing authority.
CMAS contractor non-compliance with the requirements may result in termination.
CALIFORNIA MULTIPLE AWARD SCHEDULE (CMAS)
VERKADA INC.
CMAS NUMBER 3-23-01-1017, SUPPLEMENT NUMBER 13
October 4, 2023 Ordering Instructions and Special Provisions 3
CMAS PRODUCT & SERVICE CODES
Product & Service Codes listed below are for marketing purposes only. Review the base contract for the products and/or services available.
Security-Access Control System
AVAILABLE PRODUCTS AND/OR SERVICES
This CMAS provides for the purchase, warranty, and installation of cloud-based video surveillance systems.
The ordering agency must verify all products and/or services, and pricing are currently available on the PEPPM 535122-190 contract at the PEPPM website.
The agency is required to verify PEPPM pricing by following these instructions:
1. Go to the PEPPM website.
2. Create user identification and password.
3. From the contracts search, enter the PEPPM contract number “535122-190”.
4. Click on “Shop These Line Items”.
5. If the PEPPM 535122-190 contract does not appear in the contract results, please email Suzanne Barchi at [email protected] to request access to view the contract.
EXCLUDED PRODUCTS AND/OR SERVICES
Public works services with a requirement for State contractor licensing are not available under this CMAS.
ISSUE PURCHASE ORDER TO
Orders may be placed with Verkada Inc. or with an Authorized Reseller as indicated herein:
Orders placed with Verkada Inc.
SUBMIT ORDERS TO:
Verkada Inc.
405 E 4th Avenue
San Mateo, CA 94401
Attn: Verkada
E-mail: [email protected]
CALIFORNIA MULTIPLE AWARD SCHEDULE (CMAS)
VERKADA INC.
CMAS NUMBER 3-23-01-1017, SUPPLEMENT NUMBER 13
October 4, 2023 Ordering Instructions and Special Provisions 4 Agencies with questions regarding products and/or services may contact the CMAS contractor as follows:
Contact: Kayla Medina
Phone: (801) 793-2634
E-mail: [email protected]
Website: https://www.verkada.com/
See pages 21 through 25 for the list of authorized resellers.
Orders placed with a Reseller must be addressed as shown below and payment must be made to the Reseller identified on the invoice:
Orders placed with a Reseller
SUBMIT ORDERS TO:
Verkada Inc.
c/o Reseller
Reseller’s Address
Contact:
Phone: ( ) - E-mail:
For invoicing purposes, each State Accounting office must have a copy of the reseller’s Payee Data Record (Std. 204) in order to process payment of the invoice. Agencies should forward a copy of the Std. 204 to their accounting office. Without the Std. 204, payment may be unnecessarily delayed.
RESELLERS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR SENDING A COPY OF ALL PURCHASE ORDERS TO VERKADA INC. FOR CMAS QUARTERLY REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.
TOP 500 DELINQUENT TAXPAYERS
In accordance with Public Contract Code (PCC) 10295.4, and prior to placing an order for IT goods and/or services, agencies must verify with the Franchise Tax Board and the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration that this CMAS contractor’s name does not appear on either list of the 500 largest tax delinquencies pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code 7063 or 19195. The Franchise Tax Board’s list of Top 500 Delinquent Taxpayers is available at their website. The California Department of Tax and Fee Administration’s list of Top 500 Sales & Use Tax Delinquencies in California is available at their website.
CALIFORNIA MULTIPLE AWARD SCHEDULE (CMAS)
VERKADA INC.
CMAS NUMBER 3-23-01-1017, SUPPLEMENT NUMBER 13
October 4, 2023 Ordering Instructions and Special Provisions 5 CALIFORNIA SELLER’S PERMIT
The CMAS contractor’s California Seller’s Permit Number is 103072672. Prior to placing an order with this company, agencies must verify that this permit is still valid at the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration website.
When issuing an order to an authorized reseller listed on a CMAS, it is the agency’s responsibility to ensure that the reseller holds a valid California Seller’s Permit.
MINIMUM ORDER LIMITATION
There is no minimum dollar value limitation on orders placed under this CMAS.
CMAS PRICES
The maximum prices allowed for the products and/or services available are those set forth in the base contract.
The ordering agency is encouraged to seek prices lower than those in the base contract. When responding to an agency’s Request for Offer (RFO), the CMAS contractor can offer lower prices to be competitive.
ACQUISITION OF IAAS AND/OR PAAS
If using this CMAS for the purpose of acquiring Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) and/or Platform as a Service (PaaS), State agencies must first obtain approval to use this CMAS from the California Department of Technology (CDT) in accordance with TL 17-06. State agencies must document CDT’s approval and maintain in the procurement file. Contact CDT for all questions related to the acquisition of IaaS and PaaS and TL 17-06.
EXECUTIVE ORDER N-6-22 – RUSSIA SANCTIONS
On March 4, 2022, Governor Gavin Newsom issued Executive Order N-6-22 (the EO) regarding Economic Sanctions against Russia and Russian entities and individuals. “Economic Sanctions” refers to sanctions imposed by the U.S. government in response to Russia’s actions in Ukraine, as well as any sanctions imposed under state law. The EO directs state agencies to terminate contracts with, and to refrain from entering any new contracts with, individuals or entities that are determined to be a target of Economic Sanctions. Accordingly, should the State determine Contractor is a target of Economic Sanctions or is conducting prohibited transactions with sanctioned individuals or entities, that shall be grounds for termination of this agreement. The State shall provide Contractor advance written notice of such termination, allowing Contractor at least 30 calendar days to provide a written response. Termination shall be at the sole discretion of the State.
CALIFORNIA MULTIPLE AWARD SCHEDULE (CMAS)
VERKADA INC.
CMAS NUMBER 3-23-01-1017, SUPPLEMENT NUMBER 13
October 4, 2023 Ordering Instructions and Special Provisions 6
IRAN CERTIFICATION
This CMAS contractor has certified compliance with the Iran Contracting Act, per PCC 2001-2008.
It is the agency’s responsibility to verify that the contractor has an Iran Contracting Act Certification on file.
When issuing an order to an authorized reseller listed on a CMAS, it is the agency’s responsibility to ensure that the reseller provides an Iran Contracting Act Certification.
CALIFORNIA CIVIL RIGHTS LAW CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to PCC 2010 applicants must certify their compliance with the California Civil Rights laws and Employer Discriminatory Policies (Civil Code 51, GC 12960). It is the agency’s responsibility to verify that the contractor has a California Civil Rights Law Certification on file.
When issuing an order to an authorized reseller listed on a CMAS, it is the agency’s responsibility to ensure that the reseller provides a California Civil Rights Law Certification.
WARRANTY
For warranties, see the base contract and the CMAS Warranty provision in the CMAS Terms and Conditions/General Provisions.
DELIVERY
As negotiated between agency and CMAS contractor and included in the purchase order.
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES FOR LATE DELIVERY
The value of the liquidated damages cannot be a penalty, must be mutually agreed upon by agency and contractor and included in the purchase order to be applicable.
SHIPPING INSTRUCTIONS
F.O.B. (Free On Board) Destination for orders greater than $500. Seller pays the freight charges.
F.O.B. (Free On Board) Origin for orders of $500 or less. Buying agency pays the freight charges.
State agencies shall follow the instructions below whenever the weight of the purchase is 100 lbs. or more and F.O.B. Destination, Freight Prepaid is not used. This requirement is not applicable to local government agencies.
All shipments will be made by ground transportation unless otherwise ordered on the purchase order.
CALIFORNIA MULTIPLE AWARD SCHEDULE (CMAS)
VERKADA INC.
CMAS NUMBER 3-23-01-1017, SUPPLEMENT NUMBER 13
October 4, 2023 Ordering Instructions and Special Provisions 7 Traffic Management Unit (TMU) approval is not required for any Leveraged Procurement Agreement negotiated by DGS; however, it is recommended that state agencies contact TMU for a freight weight comparison using the Freight Analysis Worksheet on the TMU website, under the “Forms” heading to ensure the state is getting the most reasonable shipping cost.
Note: If shipping charges for purchases weighing less than 100 lbs. appear to be excessive (e.g., $500 for a 5 lb. package where the shipping charge is a percentage of the cost of the item being purchased), departments are encouraged to contact TMU for help to obtain more appropriate pricing. TMU contact information can be found at the TMU website.
PURCHASING AUTHORITY DOLLAR THRESHOLD
Order limits for the purchase of goods and/or services is determined by the individual agency purchasing authority threshold.
No CMAS order may be executed by a State agency that exceeds that agency’s purchasing authority threshold, unless an exemption is granted by the Department of General Services (DGS) Purchasing Authority Unit (PAU). State agencies with approved purchasing authority, along with their dollar thresholds can be obtained at the List of State Departments with Approved Purchasing Authority website.
HOW TO USE CMAS
State agencies must adhere to the requirements in the State Contracting Manual (SCM) Volume 2, Chapter 1600 and CMAS Ordering Instructions and Special Provisions when using CMAS.
Develop an RFO, which includes a Scope of Work (SOW) and Bidder Declaration form. For information on the Bidder Declaration requirements see SCM, Volume 2, Sections 305 and 1202.
Clearly defined Tasks (what needs to be done) and Deliverables (outcome of each task, i.e., reports, procedures manual, etc.) must be included in the State’s SOW.
A Work Order Authorization (WOA) may be used to document completion of pre-determined tasks, but only if the tasks are clearly defined in the SOW. The WOA may be used to approve release for the next phase of the agreement but cannot be used to identify any tasks other than the ones called out in the SOW. The WOA will be signed by all parties and may be submitted for progress payments under the award.
Projects can be performed on a Fixed Price Per Deliverable (FP/D). Fixed Price; FP/D: A defined service, or set of services, performed by Contractor in response to a defined task, or set of tasks, at a specific fixed price, and delivered per a specific contract. Note: When using FP/D the Statement of Work must describe in detail the particular project and the work that the selected Qualified Contractor will be required to perform.
For Consulting or Personal services, do not include any labor categories/job titles or number of hours limit in RFO Requirements or the SOW. The CMAS Contractor provides this information in their Attachment B Cost Worksheet. The State does not have the expertise to make this decision (GC 19130(b)).
Search for potential CMAS contractors on the CMAS website and select “Find a CMAS Contractor.”
CALIFORNIA MULTIPLE AWARD SCHEDULE (CMAS)
VERKADA INC.
CMAS NUMBER 3-23-01-1017, SUPPLEMENT NUMBER 13
October 4, 2023 Ordering Instructions and Special Provisions 8 Request offers from a minimum of 3 CMAS contractors including one small business (SB) and/or Disabled Veteran Business Enterprise (DVBE), if available, who are authorized to sell the products and/or able to perform the services needed. (Government Code 14846(b)).
A valid attempt must be made to secure offers from viable CMAS contractors who are able to supply the goods and/or provide the services. Neither a lack of sufficient CMAS contractors nor the use of restrictive requirements meets the intent for obtaining offers (SCM Volume 2, Section 1670.2).
If requesting offers from a certified DVBE, include the Disabled Veteran Business Enterprise Declarations form (Standard 843) in the RFO. This declaration must be completed by the DVBE prime contractor and/or any DVBE subcontractors and submitted with the offer (SCM Volume 2, Section 1201).
This is not a bid transaction, so the small business preference, DVBE incentives, protest language, intent to award, evaluation criteria, advertising, Administrative and Technical Requirements, etc. are not applicable. (SCM Volume 2, Section 1603).
If less than 3 offers are received, State agencies must document their file with the reasons why the other suppliers did not respond with an offer. The reason must come from the CMAS contractor.
Assess the offers received using best value criteria including cost as one of the criteria (SCM Volume 2, Section 1603).
Issue a Purchase Order to the selected CMAS contractor.
For CMAS transactions under $10,000, only one offer is required if the State agency can establish and document that the price is fair and reasonable. The fair and reasonable method can only be used for non-customizable purchases. See SCM Volume 2, Section 1510 for Fair and Reason criteria.
Local agencies must follow their own procurement regulations. For more information see the Local Agency packet available online.
AGENCY RESPONSIBILITY
Each agency is responsible for its own contracting program and purchasing decisions, including use of the CMAS program and associated outcomes. This responsibility includes, but is not limited to, ensuring the necessity of the services, securing appropriate funding, complying with laws and policies, preparing the purchase order in a manner that safeguards the State’s best interests, obtaining required approvals, and documenting compliance with GC 19130.b(3) for outsourcing services.
It is the responsibility of each agency to consult with their legal staff and contracting offices for advice depending upon the scope or complexity of the purchase order. If legal services are not available within your agency, DGS Office of Legal Services is available to provide services.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Agencies must evaluate the proposed purchase order to determine if there are any potential conflict of interest issues. See the CMAS Terms and Conditions, Conflict of Interest, for more information.
CALIFORNIA MULTIPLE AWARD SCHEDULE (CMAS)
VERKADA INC.
CMAS NUMBER 3-23-01-1017, SUPPLEMENT NUMBER 13
October 4, 2023 Ordering Instructions and Special Provisions 9
SPLITTING ORDERS
Splitting orders to avoid any monetary limitations is prohibited. Do not circumvent normal procurement methods by splitting purchases into a series of delegated purchase orders per PCC 10329. Splitting a project into small projects to avoid either fiscal or procedural controls is prohibited per State Administrative Manual (SAM) 4819.34.
This provision does not apply to local government agencies.
ORDERING PROCEDURES
1. Purchase Orders
All Ordering Agency purchase order documents executed under this CMAS must contain the applicable CMAS number as show on page 1.
a. State Departments:
Standard 65 Purchase Documents – State departments not transacting in FISCal must use the Purchasing Authority Purchase Order (Standard 65) for purchase execution. An electronic version of the Standard 65 is available at the Department of General Services (DGS), Procurement Division (PD) website, select Standard (STD) Forms.
FISCAL Purchase Documents – State departments transacting in FISCal will follow the FISCal procurement and contracting procedures.
b. Local Government Agencies:
Local government agencies may use their own purchase order document for purchase execution.
The agency is required to complete and distribute the purchase order. For services, the agency shall modify the information contained on the order to include the service period (start and end date), the monthly cost (or other intermittent cost), and any other information pertinent to the services. The cost for each line item must be included in the order, not just system totals.
The contractor must immediately reject purchase orders that are not accurate. Discrepancies are to be negotiated and incorporated into the purchase order prior to product delivery and service implementation.
2. Service and Delivery after CMAS Expiration
The purchase order must be issued before the CMAS expires. However, delivery of the products or completion of the services may be after the CMAS expires (unless otherwise specifically stated in the purchase order). Amending the purchase order to add quantity, time, or money is not possible if the CMAS expired.
CALIFORNIA MULTIPLE AWARD SCHEDULE (CMAS)
VERKADA INC.
CMAS NUMBER 3-23-01-1017, SUPPLEMENT NUMBER 13
October 4, 2023 Ordering Instructions and Special Provisions 10
3. Multiple CMAS Agreements on a Single Purchase Order
State agencies wishing to include multiple CMAS agreements on a single FISCal purchase order must adhere to the following guidelines:
All CMAS must be for the same CMAS contractor.
The purchase order must go to one contractor location.
Enter the word “CMAS” in the space reserved for the Leveraged Procurement Agreement (LPA) number. The word “CMAS” signifies that the purchase order contains items from multiple CMAS agreements. The purchasing agency may only use one bill code.
For each individual CMAS, the agency must identify and group together the CMAS number with the line items and subtotal per CMAS number (do not include tax in the subtotal), and sequentially identify each individual CMAS as Sub #1, Sub #2, Sub #3, etc. This facilitates accurate billing of administrative fees by the Procurement Division.
The total of all items on the purchase order must not exceed the State agency’s purchasing authority dollar threshold granted by DGS PAU.
Do not combine items from IT and non-IT CMAS agreements. An Information Technology CMAS begins with the number “3” and a non-IT CMAS begins with the number “4.” The purchase order limits are different for these CMAS agreements.
4. Amendments to State Agency's Purchase Orders
Agency purchase orders cannot be amended if the CMAS has expired.
SCM, Volume 2, Section 1605 provides the following directions regarding amendments to all types of LPA purchase orders:
Original orders, which include options for changes (e.g., quantity or time), that were assessed and considered in the selection for award during the RFO process, may be amended consistent with the terms of the original order, provided that the original order allowed for amendments. If the original order did not evaluate options, then amendments are not allowed unless an Non-Competitively Bid is approved for those amendments.
Amendments unique to Non-IT Services:
If the original contract permitted amendments, but did not specify the changes, (e.g., quantity or time), it may be amended. Per PCC 10335 (d)(1), a contract may only be amended once under this exemption. The time shall not exceed one year, or add not more than 30 percent of the original order value and may not exceed $250,000. If the original contract did not have language permitting amendments, the Non-Competitively Bid process must be followed.
CMAS CONTRACTOR OWNERSHIP INFORMATION
The CMAS contractor is a large business enterprise.
CALIFORNIA MULTIPLE AWARD SCHEDULE (CMAS)
VERKADA INC.
CMAS NUMBER 3-23-01-1017, SUPPLEMENT NUMBER 13
October 4, 2023 Ordering Instructions and Special Provisions 11
SMALL BUSINESS MUST BE CONSIDERED
Prior to placing orders under the CMAS program, State agencies must first consider offers from small businesses that have established CMAS agreements (GC 14846(b)). NOTE: DGS auditors will request substantiation of compliance with this requirement when agency files are reviewed.
CMAS Small Business and Disabled Veteran Partners can be found on the CMAS website by selecting “Find a CMAS Contractor”.
In response to our commitment to increase participation by small businesses, the Department of General Services waives the administrative fee (charged to customer agencies to support the CMAS program) for orders to California certified small business enterprises.
SMALL BUSINESS/DVBE - TRACKING
State agencies are able to claim subcontracting dollars towards their SB or DVBE goals whenever the CMAS contractor subcontracts a commercially useful function to a certified SB or DVBE. The CMAS contractor will provide the ordering agency with the name of the SB or DVBE used and the dollar amount the ordering agency can apply towards its SB or DVBE goal.
SMALL BUSINESS/DVBE - SUBCONTRACTING
1. The amount an ordering agency can claim towards achieving its SB or DVBE goals is the dollar amount of the subcontract award made by the CMAS contractor to each SB or DVBE.
2. The CMAS contractor will provide an ordering agency with the following information at the time the order is quoted:
a. The CMAS contractor will state that, as the prime contractor, it shall be responsible for the overall execution of the fulfillment of the order.
b. The CMAS contractor will indicate to the ordering agency how the order meets the SB or DVBE goal, as follows:
i. List the name of each company that is certified by the Office of Small Business and DVBE Services that it intends to subcontract a commercially useful function to; and ii. Include the SB or DVBE certification number of each company listed and attach a copy of each certification; and
iii. Indicate the dollar amount of each subcontract with a SB or DVBE that may be claimed by the ordering agency towards the SB or DVBE goal; and iv. Indicate what commercially useful function the SB or DVBE subcontractor will be providing towards fulfillment of the order.
3. The ordering agency’s purchase order must be addressed to the prime contractor, and the purchase order must reference the information provided by the prime contractor as outlined above.
CALIFORNIA MULTIPLE AWARD SCHEDULE (CMAS)
VERKADA INC.
CMAS NUMBER 3-23-01-1017, SUPPLEMENT NUMBER 13
October 4, 2023 Ordering Instructions and Special Provisions 12
CONTRACTORS ACTING AS FISCAL AGENTS ARE PROHIBITED
When a subcontractor ultimately provides all of the products or performs all of the services that a CMAS contractor has agreed to provide, and the prime contractor only handles the invoicing of expenditures, then the prime contractor's role becomes that of a fiscal agent because it is merely administrative in nature and does not provide a Commercially Useful Function. It is unacceptable to use fiscal agents in this manner because the agency is paying unnecessary administrative costs.
WITHHOLD LANGUAGE (SB588)
Upon delivery or completion of ordered goods or services for which the Contractor committed to DVBE subcontractor participation, state departments must require the Contractor to certify all the following:
1. The amount and percentage of work the Contractor committed to provide to one or more DVBEs under the requirements of the contract and the amount each DVBE received from the Contractor.
2. That all payments under the contract have been made to the DVBE. Upon request, the Contractor must provide proof of payment for the work.
In accordance with the Military and Veterans Code 999.7, state departments shall withhold $10,000 from the final payment, or the full final payment if less than $10,000, if the Contractor fails to meet the certification requirements identified above. State departments shall notify the Contractor of their failure to meet the certification requirements and give the Contractor an opportunity to comply with the certification requirements. If after 30 calendar days from the date of notice, the Contractor refuses to comply with the certification requirements, the state department shall permanently deduct $10,000 from the final payment or the full payment if less than $10,000.
PRODUCT SUBSTITUTIONS
Substitution of Deliverables may not be tendered without advance written consent of the Buyer.
The Contractor must offer an equivalent or newer model of the product from the same manufacturer at the same or lower price. Contractor cannot use any specification in lieu of those contained in the Contract without written consent from the Buyer.
NEW EQUIPMENT REQUIRED
The State will procure new equipment. All equipment must be new (or warranted as newly manufactured) and the latest model in current production. Used, shopworn, demonstrator, prototype, or discontinued models are not acceptable.
Where Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) standards are available, all State agencies shall purchase only those products that meet the recommended standards. All products displaying the Energy Star label meet the FEMP standards.
CALIFORNIA MULTIPLE AWARD SCHEDULE (CMAS)
VERKADA INC.
CMAS NUMBER 3-23-01-1017, SUPPLEMENT NUMBER 13
October 4, 2023 Ordering Instructions and Special Provisions 13
SPECIAL MANUFACTURED GOODS
Any CMAS for goods to be manufactured by the CMAS contractor specifically for the State and not suitable for sale to others may require progress payments.
TRADE-IN EQUIPMENT
Trade-ins at open market price may be considered. The product description and trade-in allowance must be identified on the purchase order.
Agencies are required to adhere to SAM 3520 through 3520.6, Disposal of Personal Property and Surplus Personal Property, as applicable, when trade-ins are considered. A Property Survey Report, Standard 152, must be submitted for approval prior to disposition of any State owned personal property, including general office furniture regardless of the acquisition value, or if the property was recorded or capitalized for accounting purposes.
STATE AGENCY BUY RECYCLED CAMPAIGN
State ordering agencies are required to report purchases made within the eleven product categories in the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery’s State Agency Buy Recycled Campaign per PCC 12200 through 12217.
Contractor will be required to complete and return a Recycled-Content Certification form upon request by the state ordering agency.
ACCEPTANCE TESTING CRITERIA
If the agency wants to include acceptance testing for all newly installed technology systems, individual equipment, and machines which are added or field modified (modification of a machine from one model to another) after a successful performance period, the test criteria must be included in the purchase order to be applicable.
ELECTRONIC WASTE RECYCLING
State agencies are required to recycle state owned surplus electronic equipment that has no useful life remaining (E-Waste) to the maximum extent possible. State agencies shall dispose of E-Waste using the services of the California Prison Industry Authority (CALPIA), unless the agency meets the pickup quantity and location exemption criteria detailed in SAM 3520.10. Electronic equipment that is usable and still retains value is not considered E-Waste and must be reutilized through DGS, Office of Fleet and Asset Management (OFAM) Surplus Personal Property Warehouse.
State agencies shall determine which equipment meets the definition of E-Waste or reusable Electronic Equipment per the definitions provided in the SAM Management Memo (MM) 17-06.
OFAM will validate that equipment meets the appropriate definition when reviewing the submitted Property Survey Report (Standard 152).
The electronic waste recycling fee must be shown as a line item on the agency purchase order before the CMAS contractor can include it on their invoice.
CALIFORNIA MULTIPLE AWARD SCHEDULE (CMAS)
VERKADA INC.
CMAS NUMBER 3-23-01-1017, SUPPLEMENT NUMBER 13
October 4, 2023 Ordering Instructions and Special Provisions 14 See SAM 3520.10 for more information on this policy.
Information for submitting a Standard 152 can be found on the DGS OFAM surplus property website.
Information on the E-Waste - CALPIA Store and the E-Waste Exemption Request Form EWRF400 can be found at the CALPIA website.
PRODUCTIVE USE REQUIREMENTS
The customer in-use requirement applies to all procurements of information technology equipment and software, per Statewide Information Management Manual Section 195.
Each equipment or software component must be in current operation for a paying customer and the paying customer must be external to the contractor’s organization (not owned by the contractor and not owning the contractor).
To substantiate compliance with the Productive Use Requirements, the CMAS contractor must provide upon request the name and address of a customer installation and the name and telephone number of a contact person.
The elapsed time such equipment or software must have been in operation is based upon the importance of the equipment or software for system operation and its cost. The following designates product categories and the required period of time for equipment or software operation prior to approval of the replacement item on CMAS.
Category 1 - Critical Software: Critical software is software that is required to control the overall operation of a computer system or peripheral equipment. Included in this category are operating systems, data base management systems, language interpreters, assemblers and compilers, communications software, and other essential system software.
Cost Installation Final Bid Submission
More than $100,000 8 months 6 months
$10,000 up to $100,000 4 months 3 months
Less than $10,000 1 month 1 month
Category 2 - All Information Technology Equipment and Non-Critical Software: Information technology equipment is defined in SAM 4819.2.
Cost Installation Final Bid Submission
More than $100,000 6 months 4 months
$10,000 up to $100,000 4 months 3 months
Less than $10,000 1 month 1 month
CALIFORNIA MULTIPLE AWARD SCHEDULE (CMAS)
VERKADA INC.
CMAS NUMBER 3-23-01-1017, SUPPLEMENT NUMBER 13
October 4, 2023 Ordering Instructions and Special Provisions 15
PRODUCT INSTALLATION
The CMAS contractor is fully responsible for all installation services performed under the CMAS.
Product installations must be performed by manufacturer authorized personnel and meet manufacturer documented specifications.
The prime contractor, as well as any subcontractors, must hold any certifications and/or licenses required for the project.
NOT SPECIFICALLY PRICED ITEMS
The only time that open market/incidental, non-contract items may be included in a CMAS order is when they fall under the parameters of the Not Specifically Priced (NSP) Items provision.
CMAS contractors must be authorized providers of the hardware, software and/or services they offer under the NSP Items provision.
Agency and CMAS contractor use of the NSP provision is subject to the following requirements:
1. Purchase orders containing only NSP items are prohibited.
2. A purchase order containing NSP items may be issued only if it results in the lowest overall alternative to the State.
3. NSP items shall be clearly identified in the order. Any product or service already specifically priced and included in the base contract may not be identified as an NSP item.
4. NSP Installation Services: The CMAS contractor is fully responsible for all installation services performed under the CMAS. Product installations must be performed by manufacturer authorized personnel and meet manufacturer documented specifications. The prime contractor, as well as any subcontractors, must hold any certifications and/or licenses required for the project. The total dollar value of all installation services included in the purchase order cannot exceed the dollar value of the products included in the purchase order, nor can they exceed the NSP Maximum Order Limitation.
5. Maximum Order Limitation: For orders $250,000, or less, the total dollar value of all NSP items included in a purchase order shall not exceed $5,000. For orders exceeding $250,000, and at the option of the contractor, the total dollar value of all NSP items in a purchase order shall not exceed 5% of the total cost of the order or $25,000 whichever is lower.
6. An NSP item included in an order issued against this CMAS is subject to all of the terms and conditions set forth in the CMAS.
CALIFORNIA MULTIPLE AWARD SCHEDULE (CMAS)
VERKADA INC.
CMAS NUMBER 3-23-01-1017, SUPPLEMENT NUMBER 13
October 4, 2023 Ordering Instructions and Special Provisions 16
7. Trade-ins, upgrades, involving the swapping of boards, are permissible, where the contract makes specific provisions for this action. In those instances, where it is permitted, the purchase order must include the replacement item and a notation that the purchase involves the swapping of a board.
The following NSP items are specifically excluded from any order issued under this CMAS:
1. Items not intended for use in direct support of the priced items included in the same order.
An NSP item must be subordinate to the specifically priced item that it is supporting. For example, a cable, which is not otherwise specifically priced in the base contract, is subordinate to a specifically priced printer and is eligible to be an NSP item subject to that cable meeting the remaining NSP requirements. However, a printer that is not otherwise specifically priced in the base contract, is not subordinate to a specifically priced cable and is not eligible to be an NSP item.
2. Supply type items, except for the minimum amount necessary to provide initial support to the priced items included in the same order.
3. Items that do not meet the Productive Use Requirements for information technology products, per Statewide Information Management Manual Section 195.
4. Any other item or class of items specifically excluded from the scope of this CMAS.
5. Public Works and other services NOT in support of the products covered by this CMAS.
6. Products or services the CMAS contractor is NOT factory authorized or otherwise certified or trained to provide.
7. Follow-on consultant services that were previously recommended or suggested by the same CMAS contractor.
The CMAS contractor is required to reject purchase orders containing NSP items that do not comply with the above requirements. The CMAS contractor will promptly notify the agency issuing the noncompliant order of its rejection and the reasons for its rejection.
STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS CAN USE CMAS
State and local government agency use of CMAS is optional. A local government is any city, county, city and county, district, or other local governmental body or corporation, including Universities of California, California State Universities, K-12 schools, and community colleges empowered to expend public funds. While the State makes this CMAS available, each local government agency should make its own determination whether the CMAS program is consistent with its procurement policies and regulations.
CALIFORNIA MULTIPLE AWARD SCHEDULE (CMAS)
VERKADA INC.
CMAS NUMBER 3-23-01-1017, SUPPLEMENT NUMBER 13
October 4, 2023 Ordering Instructions and Special Provisions 17 PCC 10298 allows any city, county, city and county, district, or other local governmental body or corporation empowered to expend public funds to contract with suppliers awarded CMAS without further competitive bidding. See complete PCC 10298 language at the California Legislative Information website.
PCC 10299 allows any school district empowered to expend public funds to utilize CMAS without further competitive bidding. See complete PCC 10299 language at the California Legislative Information website.
SELF-DELETING BASE CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Instructions or terms and conditions that appear in the Special Items or other provisions of the base contract and apply to the purchase, license, or rental (as applicable) of products or services by the US Government in the United States and/or to any overseas location shall be self-deleting. (Example: "Examinations of Records" provision).
Federal regulations and standards, such as Federal Acquisition Regulation, Federal Information Resources Management Regulation, Federal Information Processing Standards, General Services Administration Regulation, or Federal Installment Payment Agreement shall be self-deleting.
Federal blanket orders and small order procedures are not applicable.
ORDER OF PRECEDENCE
The CMAS Terms and Conditions take precedence if there is a conflict between the terms and conditions of the contractor's base contract, packaging, invoices, catalogs, brochures, technical data sheets, or other documents (see CMAS Terms and Conditions, CONFLICT OF TERMS).
APPLICABLE CODES, POLICIES AND GUIDELINES
All California codes, policies, and guidelines are applicable. The use of CMAS does not relieve state agencies of their responsibility to meet statewide requirements regarding contracting or the procurement of goods or services. Most procurement and contract codes, policies, and guidelines are incorporated into CMAS agreements; however, there is no guarantee that every requirement that pertains to all State processes has been included.
PAYMENTS AND INVOICES
1. Payment Terms
Payment terms for this CMAS are net 45 days.
Payment will be made in accordance with the provisions of the California Prompt Payment Act, GC 927. Unless expressly exempted by statute, the Act requires State agencies to pay properly submitted, undisputed invoices not more than 45 days after (1) the date of acceptance of goods or performance of services; or (2) receipt of an undisputed invoice, whichever is later.
CALIFORNIA MULTIPLE AWARD SCHEDULE (CMAS)
VERKADA INC.
CMAS NUMBER 3-23-01-1017, SUPPLEMENT NUMBER 13
October 4, 2023 Ordering Instructions and Special Provisions 18
2. Payee Data Record (Standard 204)
State Agencies must obtain a copy of the Payee Data Record (Standard 204) in order to process payments. State Ordering Agencies must forward a copy of the Standard 204 to their accounting offices. Without the Standard 204, payment may be unnecessarily delayed. State Agencies should contact the CMAS contractor for copies of the Payee Data Record.
3. DGS Administrative and Incentive Fees
Orders from State Agencies:
DGS will bill each State agency directly an administrative fee for use of CMAS. The administrative fee should NOT be included in the order total or remitted before an invoice is received from DGS. This administrative fee is waived for CMAS purchase orders issued to California certified small businesses.
Orders from Local Government Agencies:
CMAS contractors, who are not California certified small businesses, are required to remit to DGS an incentive fee equal to a percentage of the total of all local government agency orders (excluding sales tax and shipping) placed against their CMAS.
The incentive fee is waived for CMAS purchase orders issued to California certified small businesses.
For more information on the incentive fees see the CMAS Management Guide.
4. Contractor Invoices
Unless otherwise stipulated, the CMAS contractor must send their invoices to the agency address set forth in the purchase order. Invoices shall be submitted in triplicate and shall include the following:
CMAS number
Agency purchase order number
Agency Bill Code (State Only)
Line item number
Unit price
Extended line item price
Invoice total
State sales tax and/or use tax shall be itemized separately and added to each invoice as applicable.
The company name on the CMAS, purchase order and invoice must match, or the State Controller’s Office will not approve payment.
CALIFORNIA MULTIPLE AWARD SCHEDULE (CMAS)
VERKADA INC.
CMAS NUMBER 3-23-01-1017, SUPPLEMENT NUMBER 13
October 4, 2023 Ordering Instructions and Special Provisions 19
5. Advance Payments
Advance payment is allowed for services only under limited, narrowly defined circumstances, i.e., between specific departments and certain types of non-profit organizations, or when paying another government agency (GC 11256 through 11263 and 11019).
It is NOT acceptable to pay in advance, except software maintenance and license fees, which are considered a subscription and may be paid in advance if a provision addressing payment in advance is included in the purchase order.
Software warranty upgrades and extensions may also be paid for in advance, one time.
6. Credit Card
The CMAS contractor does not accept the State of California credit card (VISA CAL-Card).
7. Leasing/Financing
California State Agencies should use the Golden State Financial Marketplace (GS SMart) program for all financing and leasing needs. California Local Government Agencies (counties, cities, K-12 school districts, community colleges, California State Universities, Universities of California, etc.) may utilize the GS SMart program for financing and leasing according to PCC 14937. The minimum dollar amount for Local Government Agency financing and leasing is $100,000.
8. Lease/Purchase Analysis
California State agencies must complete a Lease/Purchase Analysis (LPA) to determine best value when contemplating a lease/rental and retain a copy for future audit purposes (SAM 3710).
For short-term rental equipment, the lease/purchase analysis must be approved by DGS Office of Legal Services.
The lease/purchase analysis for all other purchases must be approved by the Department of General Services, GS SMart State Financial Marketplace. Buyers may contact the GS SMart Unit via e-mail at [email protected] for further information.
9. Leasing
The State reserves the right to select the form of payment for all procurements, whether it is an outright purchase with payment rendered directly by the State, or a financing/lease-purchase or operating lease via the State Financial Marketplace (GS SMart and/or Lease SMart). If payment is via the financial marketplace, the CMAS contractor will invoice the State and the State will approve the invoice. The selected Lender/Lessor for all product listed on the State’s procurement document will pay the supplier on behalf of the State. Buyers may contact the GS SMart Unit via e-mail at [email protected] for further information.
CALIFORNIA MULTIPLE AWARD SCHEDULE (CMAS)
VERKADA INC.
CMAS NUMBER 3-23-01-1017, SUPPLEMENT NUMBER 13
October 4, 2023 Ordering Instructions and Special Provisions 20
OBTAINING COPY OF CMAS
A copy of this CMAS can be obtained at Cal eProcure. Links to the CMAS terms and conditions and base contract are available on the front page of this CMAS agreement.
It is important for the agency to confirm that the required products, services, and prices are included in the CMAS and are at or below base contract rates. To streamline verification that the needed items are in the base contract, the agencies should ask the CMAS contractor to identify the specific location in the base contract that include the required products, services, and prices.
Once verified, agencies should save the information for their file documentation.
FEDERAL DEBARMENT
When federal funds are expended, the agency is required to obtain (retain in file) a signed “Federal Debarment” certification from the CMAS contractor before the purchase order is issued. This certification is required by the regulations implementing Executive Order 12549, Debarment and Suspension, 29 CFR Part 98, Section 98.510, Participants; responsibilities. The regulations were published as Part VII of the May 26, 1988 Federal Register (pages 19160-19211).
CONTRACTOR TRAVEL
The Travel provision is not applicable to this CMAS.
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITY ACT
To view the DGS Accessibility Policy, please visit the DGS website.
CALIFORNIA MULTIPLE AWARD SCHEDULE (CMAS)
VERKADA INC.
CMAS NUMBER 3-23-01-1017, SUPPLEMENT NUMBER 13
LIST OF AUTHORIZED RESELLERS
Company Name California Contractor's
License Number
California
Seller's Permit Company Address Point of Contact
A3 Communications, Inc.
doing business as Blue
Violet Networks
1090056 261593792 17815 Newhope St., Ste M
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
David Kim
(714) 754-4000
[email protected]
Accent Electronics doing
business as Standard
Electronics
590876 025672587 613 West Main Street
El Cajon CA 92020
Brent Dusenberry
(619) 596-9950
[email protected]
Access Tech Security N/A 229972640 1761 E Washington Blvd.
Pasadena, CA 91104
Mohammad Shirmohammadi
(626) 400-0110
[email protected]
Akins IT, Inc. 992038 102085025 3406 Via Lido, 1A-22
Newport Beach, CA 92663
Michelle McKernan
(949) 407-7122
[email protected]
AMS.NET, Inc. 763508 097642448 502 Commerce Way
Livermore, CA 94551
Diana Monaghan
(925) 245-6100
[email protected]
ASSI Security 683831 102092166
1370 Reynolds Ave., Suite
201
Irvine, CA 92614
Tammie Searfoss
(949) 836-8793
[email protected]
Assure MSP, Inc. N/A 233182144 528 Edgewood Rd.
San Mateo, CA 94402
Jim Graf
(415) 516-7475
[email protected]
Assured Technology
Inc N/A 102113334
800 W El Camino Real, Ste
180
Mountain View, CA 94040
Brian James
(408) 416-7080
[email protected]
Axcelerate Networks,
Inc. N/A 100084522 490 N 1st Street San Jose, CA 95112
Martin Vargas
(408) 637-4718
[email protected]
October 4, 2023 Ordering Instructions and Special Provisions 21
CALIFORNIA MULTIPLE AWARD SCHEDULE (CMAS)
VERKADA INC.
CMAS NUMBER 3-23-01-1017, SUPPLEMENT NUMBER 13
October 4, 2023 Ordering Instructions and Special Provisions 22 Company Name California Contractor's
License Number
California
Seller's Permit Company Address Point of Contact
B.L. Solutions N/A 216679456 3001 Auto Mall Dr #D-100
Bakersfield, CA 93313
Richard Garrett
(661) 917-6493
[email protected]
Bluum USA, Inc. N/A 030657935
4675 E. Cotton Ctr Blvd,
Ste 155
Phoenix, AZ 85040
Manuel Martinez
(661) 889-7499
[email protected]
CDW Government LLC 1019269 101346422
200 N Milwaukee Ave.
Vernon Hills, IL 60061-
1577
Ben Estes
(214) 415-5538
[email protected]
COA Associates LLC 1100522 255334848 1450 2nd Street #120 Santa Monica, CA 90401
Brian Armstrong
(213) 669-5834
[email protected]
Covered 6, L.L.C. N/A 101693596 868 Patriot Dr Unit C
Moorpark, CA 93065
Spencer brady
(805) 926-2055
[email protected]
Development Group,
Inc. 992824 101172281 6704 Lockheed Dr Redding, CA 96002 Dan Lockwood
(530) 510-4297
[email protected]
DHE Computer
Systems LLC N/A 215378112 7076 S. Alton Way, Bldg C Centennial, CO 80112 Greg Ingram
(303) 290-6050
[email protected]
DigiTech Integration
Inc. 923604 101140724 104 East Sixth Street Hanford, CA 93230 Mark Parker
(559) 582-2300
[email protected]
m
EKC Enterprises, Inc. 916095 102409870 4658 E Weathermaker Ave Fresno, CA 93703
Chris Shafer
(559) 438-0330
[email protected]
CALIFORNIA MULTIPLE AWARD SCHEDULE (CMAS)
VERKADA INC.
CMAS NUMBER 3-23-01-1017, SUPPLEMENT NUMBER 13
October 4, 2023 Ordering Instructions and Special Provisions 23 Company Name California Contractor's
License Number
California
Seller's Permit Company Address Point of Contact
ELD Experts, LLC doing
business as Monarch N/A 103046895 1819 Polk St, #320 San Francisco, CA 94109 Finance Dept
(415) 964-3697
[email protected]
ePlus Technology, Inc. 1014560 097955982
13595 Dulles Technology
Dr.
Herndon, VA 20171
Dustin Ferris
[email protected]
Gigakom 910431 101608911
9245 Acitivity Road Ste
105
San Diego, CA 92126
Andrej Komatina
(858) 769-5410
[email protected]
Global CTI Group, Inc. 815066 097862891
5329 Office Center Court,
Ste 200, Bakersfield, CA
93309
David Kaiser
(661) 323-7553
[email protected]
Gridless Power
Corporation N/A 220784672
7905 Browning Rd, Suite
104
Pennsauken, NJ 08109
Andrew Leonard
(609) 458-2769
[email protected]
HCI Systems, Inc. 905493 101114754 1354 S Parkside Pl
Ontario, CA 91761
Michael Kern
(909) 835-9784
[email protected]
Howard Industries, Inc. 1059006 102423643 36 Howard Drive Ellisville, MS 39437
Brandey Boyd
(601) 399-5831
[email protected]
Infinity Power Solutions
Inc. 1080287 238475296 3727 W. Annadale Ave Fresno, CA 93706 Chad Torres
(559) 903-3211
[email protected]
Infinity Technologies N/A 247372096 PO Box 582404
Elk Grove, CA 95758
Mohammad Ahmed
(916) 479-5560
[email protected]
IT Management
Corporation 944128 101684160
5201 Great America Pkwy
Ste 320
Santa Clara, CA 95054
Maryam Mohammadi
(408) 908-0027
[email protected]
CALIFORNIA MULTIPLE AWARD SCHEDULE (CMAS)
VERKADA INC.
CMAS NUMBER 3-23-01-1017, SUPPLEMENT NUMBER 13
October 4, 2023 Ordering Instructions and Special Provisions 24 Company Name California Contractor's
License Number
California
Seller's Permit Company Address Point of Contact
Matrix Audio Visual
Designs, Inc. 765990 097564056 2525 W. Burbank Blvd Burbank, CA 91505 Alina Mirzakhaian
(818) 841-4700
[email protected]
Montgomery Hardware
Co. 285746 011231277
8777 Lanyard Court
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
91730
Rick Myers
(909) 204-4024
[email protected]
Netsync Network
Solutions, Inc. N/A 103222303
2500 West Loop South,
Ste. 410
Houston, TX 77027
Clara Alessi
(713) 248-7294
[email protected]
Network Integration
Company Partners, Inc.
doing business as NIC
Partners
904167 100923406
11981 Jack Benny Dr,
#103
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
91739
Doreen Fiola
(909) 919-2806
[email protected]
Nth Generation
Computing, Inc. N/A 025914742
17055 Camino San
Bernardo
San Diego, CA 92127
Joyce Russell
(858) 451-2383
[email protected]
Pacific OneSource, Inc.
doing business as STS
Education
N/A 101187699 130-A W Cochran St
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Jeremy Gilbert
(866) 499-2580 ext 1835
jeremy.gilbert@stseducationus.com
Paragon Systems, Inc. 949118 254501536 915 Calle Amanecer #K San Clemente, CA 92673
Peter Pawlack
(949) 885-6478
[email protected]
Pixabytes Solutions,
Inc. N/A 102723514 2318 M L King St Calexico CA 92231
Veronica Ortiz
(760) 565-5003, Ext. 505
[email protected]
Presidio Networked
Solutions Group, LLC 1095300 102206212
8161 Maple Lawn Blvd, Ste
150
Fulton, MD 20759
Johannah Renfroe
(301) 313-2017
[email protected]
CALIFORNIA MULTIPLE AWARD SCHEDULE (CMAS)
VERKADA INC.
CMAS NUMBER 3-23-01-1017, SUPPLEMENT NUMBER 13
October 4, 2023 Ordering Instructions and Special Provisions 25 Company Name California Contractor's
License Number
California
Seller's Permit Company Address Point of Contact
QOVO Solutions, Inc.
doing business as QOVO
Communications
1058025 103158711
16060 Caputo Drive, Ste
120
Morgan Hill, CA 95037
Garth Gilmour
(844) 768-6462
[email protected]
Quest Media &
Supplies, Inc. 589553 028744247
9000 Foothills Blvd. Ste.
100
Roseville CA 95747
Amy Comi
(916) 338-7070
[email protected]
Sable Computer Inc.
doing business as KIS
Computer Center
1072691 026800992 43160 Osgood Road
Fremont, CA 94539
Sue Canevaro
(510) 403-7557
[email protected]
Safe and Sound
Security 1039579 102884155
2125 Oak Grove Rd, Ste
310
Walnut Creek, CA 94598
Tyler Nyquist
(925) 566-8611
[email protected]
Safe House Corp. N/A 220147232 1237 Del Mar Ave, Vallejo, CA 945898
Greg Milligan
(925) 595-8102
[email protected]
Vector Resources, Inc. 654046 018728811 20917 Higgins Court Torrance, CA 90501
Briana Borrenpohl
(310) 436-1126
[email protected]
XIT Inc. doing business
as XIT Solutions 1014012 099579052
638 Lindero Canyon Rd.,
Ste 288 | Oak Park, CA
91377
Craig May
(661) 635-0365
[email protected]
Authorized resellers must possess a valid California State Contractor’s License to provide public works services.
Town Council Agenda Report
Date: May 27, 2025
To: Honorable Mayor and Town Council
Subject: INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION (ICE)
YUCCA LOMA ROAD AND RINCON ROAD
From: Douglas Robertson, Town Manager
Submitted by: Richard Pedersen, Town Engineer
Engineering Division
Budgeted Item: Yes No N/A
RECOMMENDED ACTION
A. Approve recommendations of Kimley Horn’s Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) for a Roundabout at the intersection of Yucca Loma Road and Rincon Road.
B. Direct staff to provide for approval an addendum to Kimley Horn and Associates’ current contract for the design of the Yucca Loma Road widening project to include the design and specifications for the Roundabout at Yucca Loma Road and Rincon Road.
BACKGROUND
The Engineering Division is currently preparing to construct the second (2nd) phase of the Yucca Loma Road Widening Project from 1,200 feet east of Apple Valley Road to and including the intersection at Rincon Road, a design that Kimley Horn and Associates has produced. During this past year, staff have been obtaining the necessary construction easements from adjacent property owners prior to advertising this phase of construction.
The current construction plans indicate that the intersection of Rincon Road and Yucca Loma Road will be widened to five (5) travel lanes, two (2) east bound lanes, two (2) west bound lanes and left turn lanes. The plan also indicates that the intersection will remain as an all-way stop-control (AWSC) intersection. Though the additional travel lanes entering and exiting this intersection will improve mobility, to some degree, staff determined that a more extensive evaluation would be appropriate at this time to consider other options, including a traffic signal and a roundabout.
ANALYSIS
Since the opening of the Yucca Loma Bridge and the railroad bridge in Victorville. The intersection of Yucca Loma Road and Rincon Road has experienced an increase of traffic demand and currently operates at a Level of Service (LOS) “F” with an average peak hour
delay of 51 seconds. An Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) was recently completed by Kimley Horn & Associates (attached) to determine if a more safe and efficient traffic control improvement would be more appropriate than maintaining the existing all-way stop controls. The evaluation also provides information as to which intersection control will provide the greatest return on investment (ROI) over the design-life of 20 years for the study intersection.
The following intersection control improvement alternatives were analyzed in the ICE:
• No Build Alternative: AWSC
• Alternative 1: Traffic Signal
• Alternative 2: Roundabout Fiscal impact
The evaluation provides detailed cost benefit analysis for each alternative. For traffic congestion, it indicates that a traffic signal will improve the LOS from F to C under current, 2025 traffic conditions, and a LOS D under 2045 conditions.
A Roundabout will improve the LOS from F to A under current 2025 traffic conditions, and a LOS A under 2045 traffic conditions.
The following are the RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSION from the report. “An evaluation of the estimated benefit and cost performance measures indicates that, when forecast traffic volumes are considered for a minimum 20-year service life, a roundabout-controlled intersection is the preferred alternative at the intersection of Yucca Loma Road and Rincon Road.
• The existing AWSC will have the longest delays and queue lengths out of all the intersection control alternatives at the study intersection. • The roundabout alternative has the lowest life-cycle societal cost on delay. • The existing AWSC and the roundabout alternative have similar life-cycle societal cost on safety.
• The existing AWSC and the roundabout alternative have similar life-cycle operations and maintenance (O&M) costs.
• The roundabout and traffic signal would have a greater return on investment compared to the existing AWSC over the lifecycle of the intersection. • The roundabout alternative has an additional $4,032,255 benefit life-cycle cost compared to the traffic signal alternative.
• Apple Valley will start to see a positive return on investment from the roundabout compared to the traffic signal after 5 years.
In comparing the efficacy of a traffic signal and a roundabout to reduce broadside collisions, each intersection control type presents distinct benefits and limitations. The existing all-way stop may operate effectively in low to moderate traffic volumes but may not perform well under high traffic volumes, as can be seen by the existing collisions and
delays. Traffic signals, while more efficient in managing higher traffic volumes than an AWSC, can reduce broadside collisions but may increase other types of collisions such as rear-end collisions. Traffic signals will not prevent drivers from running red lights, however, and thus may have a reduced impact on preventing broadside collisions.
Roundabouts, however, consistently demonstrate a significant reduction in broadside collisions due to their design which naturally slows down traffic and eliminates crossing traffic paths, thus reducing the potential for severe collisions.”
ATTACHMENTS
A. Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE), produced by Kimley Horn and Associates.
April 2025
Copyright © Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION
YUCCA LOMA ROAD AT RINCON ROAD
APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
Prepared for:
Town of Apple Valley
14955 Dale Evans Parkway
Apple Valley, CA 92307
760 240 7000
Prepared by:
INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION
FOR
YUCCA LOMA ROAD AT RINCON ROAD
Prepared for:
Town of Apple Valley
14955 Dale Evans Parkway
Apple Valley, CA 92307
760 240 7000
Prepared by:
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
73-700 Dinah Shore Dr.
Suite 101
Palm Desert, California 92211
This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. © April 2025
ICE – Yucca Loma Road at Rincon Road
Intersection Control Evaluation
Yucca Loma Road at Rincon Road in Apple Valley, CA
INTRODUCTION
An Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) was completed for the intersection of Yucca Loma Road and Rincon Road (the “study intersection”) in Apple Valley, California. The existing four-legged intersection operates as an all-way stop-control (AWSC). Continuous area growth is expected to increase demand at the study intersection. The purpose of this ICE is to determine which intersection control will provide the greatest return on investment (ROI) over the design-life (20 years) for the study intersection.
The following intersection control improvement alternatives were analyzed in this ICE:
• No Build Alternative: AWSC
• Alternative 1: Traffic Signal
• Alternative 2: Roundabout
TRAFFIC ANALYSIS SCENARIOS
Near-term and future-term volumes were determined at the study intersection and are identified as:
• Existing Year Conditions (2025)
a. Traffic counts were taken Wednesday March 12, 2025.
• Horizon Year Conditions (2045)
a. Existing counts were grown at a linear growth rate of 2.25% for 20 years.
The growth rate was calculated by assuming a volume-to-capacity (v/c) ratio of 0.95 for the single-lane roundabout in Horizon Year (2045). Evaluating the available capacity, the existing volumes can increase 45% over the span of 20 years.
See Appendix A for the intersection traffic volumes and heavy vehicle percentages that were used for the intersection analysis.
EXISTING CONDITIONS AND PROPOSED ALTERNATIVES
Existing Conditions
Yucca Loma Road is an east-west major road extending to the west of State Highway 18 with a posted speed limit of 45 miles per hour (mph) and dedicated left-turn lanes present at the intersection. Rincon Road is a north-south collector road with a posted speed limit of 45 mph and shared lanes in both directions. There is residential housing on all corners of the intersection.
Figure 1 illustrates the existing intersection control as well as potential design constraints and considerations. Identified potential constraints and design considerations at Yucca Loma Road and Rincon Road include:
1. Right-of-way
2. Lifeline Trail
3. Driveway
ICE – Yucca Loma Road at Rincon Road
Figure 1: Existing Design Constraints on Improved Intersection Geometry No Build Alternative: All-Way Stop-Control (AWSC)
The existing AWSC currently operates at LOS F and E during the AM and PM peak periods, respectively with a maximum delay of 51.0 seconds and a 95th percentile queue length of 400 feet on the eastbound and westbound approaches.
The intersection is projected to operate at LOS F for the 2045 AM and PM peak periods, with a maximum delay of 228.7 seconds and a 95th percentile queue of 1,150 feet on the eastbound approach. Table 1 below summarizes the operations for the existing AWSC.
Table 1: Existing AWSC Operations
Year
AM PM
LOS Delay (s)
95% Queue (ft)
(approach)
LOS Delay (s)
95% Queue (ft)
(approach)
2025 F 51.0 400 (WB) E 43.9 400 (EB)
2045 F 202.0 925 (WB) F 228.7 1,150 (EB)
Corner Sight Distance (CSD) and Stopping Sight Distance (SSD) were assessed at the existing study intersection. A design speed of 50 mph was used to determine SSD. Yucca Loma Road and Rincon Road are straight alignments approaching the intersection and the approximate right-of-way lines are 25-30 feet offset from Yucca Loma Road and 15-20 feet offset from Rincon Road. These straight approaches and property offsets with little to no obstructions within the right-of-way provide appropriate stopping sight distance for approaching vehicles. With the existing intersection being AWSC, vehicles are required to make a complete stop which provides slow intersection speeds. Given these factors and upon our review, there are clear sight lines to all stopped vehicles at the intersection.
Yucca Loma Drive
Rincon Drive
1 1
1 1
2 2
3 3
3 3
ICE – Yucca Loma Road at Rincon Road
The most recent available five (5) year collision history was reviewed and there were three broadside injury collisions at the Yucca Loma Road and Rincon Road intersection between 2020 – 2024 due to vehicle code violation. As evidence by the collisions, all-way stop intersections can experience broadside collisions due to factors such as failure to observe right-of-way rules, driver distraction, limited visibility, inadequate signage, and high traffic volumes. These factors can combine to create situations where broadside collisions are more likely to occur. The comparison of a traffic signal and roundabout to reduce broadside collisions is further discussed and summarized in a memorandum that can be found in Appendix B.
Proposed Intersection Control Alternatives
The corridor of Yucca Loma Road in the vicinity of the study intersection is a 2-lane road with 12-foot lanes, no curb and gutter, and a high number of residential driveways. There is an existing 8-foot multiuse trail along the south of Yucca Loma Road that is part of Apple Valley’s Lifeline Trails network.
Minimum improvements are to be made to relieve traffic congestion and maintain the existing roadway configurations.
A signal warrant analysis was conducted, and it was determined that a traffic signal is warranted under existing conditions for the AWSC intersection at Yucca Loma Road and Rincon Road. The current demand meets signal warrant 1 (eight-hour), warrant 2 (four-hour), and warrant 3 (peak hour), as described in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Refer to Appendix C for the signal warrant analysis supporting documentation.
Three intersection control alternatives were considered in the ICE for the intersection of Yucca Loma Road and Rincon Road: AWSC (No Build), Traffic Signal, and Roundabout. The proposed signal adds left-turn lanes to the northbound and southbound approaches along Rincon Road. Two single-lane roundabout concepts were drafted with a 90-foot inscribed circle diameter (ICD), avoiding potential encroachment right-of-way, and a 120-foot ICD to accommodate a larger design vehicle. See Appendix D for full-size layout concept exhibits.
Alternative 1: Traffic Signal
This alternative replaces the existing AWSC with traffic signal control. Adding signal control improves the operations to LOS D for 2045 horizon year, with a maximum expected delay of 40.1 seconds and a 95th percentile queue of 700 feet on the eastbound approach. Operations for Alternative A is summarized in Table 2. A concept layout exhibit is shown in Figure 2 with the following limitations identified:
1. Driveway location does not accommodate left-turn movement
2. U-turns not allowed
Table 2: Traffic Signal Operations
Year
AM PM
LOS Delay (s)
95% Queue (ft)
(approach)
LOS Delay (s)
95% Queue (ft)
(approach)
2025 C 22.8 325 (WB) B 18.3 350 (EB)
2045 D 40.1 400 (WB) D 37.2 700 (EB)
ICE – Yucca Loma Road at Rincon Road
Figure 2: Traffic Signal Control
Alternative 2: Roundabout
This alternative replaces the existing intersection control with a single-lane roundabout. The size and placement of the roundabout will vary depending on the required design vehicles and pedestrian access; two alternatives were developed, a 90-foot ICD with no expected right-of-way impacts is shown in Figure 3 and 120-foot ICD accommodating larger left- and right-turning design vehicles is shown in Figure 4. The traffic operations and safety between the two roundabout alternatives are expected to be similar. Property driveways are accommodated in both alternatives with curb tie-ins or extensions; however, the following limitations and characteristics are identified:
1. Driveway location does not accommodate left-turn movement
2. Roundabout U-turn movement to access driveway
The roundabout alternatives are expected to operate at LOS A for 2025 and LOS C for 2045 PM peak hour. There will be a delay of 16.5 seconds and a 95th percentile queue of 350 feet on the eastbound approach. Table 3 summarizes the operations for Alternative B. See Appendix E for intersection LOS analysis worksheets.
Table 3: Roundabout Operations
Year
AM PM
LOS Delay (s)
95% Queue (ft)
(approach)
LOS Delay (s)
95% Queue (ft)
(approach)
2025 A 5.2 50 (SB) A 9.6 150 (EB)
2045 A 6.1 50 (SB) C 16.5 350 (EB)
1 1
1 1
2 1
1
ICE – Yucca Loma Road at Rincon Road
Figure 3: 90-foot ICD Roundabout Control
Figure 4: 120-foot ICD Roundabout Control
1 1
1 1
2 2
ICE – Yucca Loma Road at Rincon Road
SUMMARY OF KEY PERFORMANCE MEASURES
Four performance metrics are analyzed at the study intersection to calculate the Benefit Cost (B/C) Ratio which measures the expected return on investment for each proposed intersection control. The performance measures used to calculate the benefits of the proposed improvement compared to the existing condition, or no project alternative are:
• Safety Benefit (of the proposed intersection control type) • Delay Reduction Benefit (of the proposed intersection control type) Performance measures used to calculate the conceptual level costs of the proposed intersection control improvement compared to the existing condition, or no project alternative are:
• Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Cost (added costs of the proposed intersection control type) • Initial Capital Cost (added costs of the proposed intersection control type) Refer to Appendix F for a detailed description of each performance measure and the Cal B/C 2025 Value Comparison Table1that were used in this B/C Analysis.
PERFORMANCE MEASURE SUMMARY
Table 4 below summarizes the cost of key performance measures calculated for each control type at the intersection of Yucca Loma Road and Rincon Road, assuming 20-years of intersection operations to calculate life-cycle costs. The following Figures 5-9 on the next page graphically show these costs comparatively and identify a preferred alternative for each performance measure.
Table 4: Performance Measure Summary
1 Cal B/C 2025 Value Comparison Table, Caltrans, January 2025.
No Build (AWSC) Signal Roundabout
Annual Cost of Collisions $139,239 $280,239 $158,531
Discounted Life Cycle Cost of Collisions $2,141,577 $4,318,790 $2,444,229 No Build (AWSC) Signal Roundabout
Annual Quantity (hours) 50271 10956 5965
Annual Cost $981,515 $222,131 $119,384
Total Discounted Life Cycle Cost $20,611,805 $4,664,754 $2,507,061 No Build (AWSC) Signal Roundabout
Annual O&M Costs $600 $9,100 $1,200
Discounted Life Cycle O&M Costs $9,445 $143,242 $18,889 Discounted Pavement Rehab Costs $0 $0 $0
Total O&M Costs $9,445 $143,242 $18,889
No Build (AWSC) Signal Roundabout
High Approximation $0 $3,000,000 $4,000,000
Low Approximation $0 $1,500,000 $2,000,000
Average $0 $2,250,000 $3,000,000
Delay
Operations and Maintenance
Initial Capital
Safety
PERFORMANCE MEASURE LIFE CYCLE COST (NET PRESENT VALUE)
ICE – Yucca Loma Road at Rincon Road
Benefit Performance Measures
Safety
Figure 5: Lifecycle Cost of Safety
Preferred Alternative:
The existing AWSC and roundabout
alternative provide safety benefits over the
signal alternative when comparing the
predicted life-cycle cost for safety. The safety
cost benefit of the roundabout will continue
to increase over time when compared to a
signalized intersection
Delay
Figure 6: Lifecycle Cost of Delay
Preferred Alternative:
The two proposed alternatives provide
delay benefits over the existing AWSC when
comparing the predicted life-cycle cost for
delay.
Cost Performance Measures
Operations and Maintenance (O&M)
Figure 7: Lifecycle Cost of O&M
Preferred Alternative:
The existing AWSC and roundabout
alternative provide lower O&M cost solutions
over the traffic signal alternative when based
solely on lowest expected life-cycle O&M
costs.
ICE – Yucca Loma Road at Rincon Road
Initial Capital Costs
Figure 8: Initial Capital Costs
Preferred Alternative:
Of the two proposed alternatives, the traffic
signal would have a lower initial capital cost.
TRAFFIC OPERATIONS SUMMARY
Figure 9: 2045 Intersection Delay
The bar chart to the left compares
the peak hour intersection delay for
the 2045 horizon year between the
existing AWSC and the two
proposed alternatives. The existing
AWSC will have significantly more
delay than the proposed signal and
roundabout during both future AM
and PM peak hours.
ICE – Yucca Loma Road at Rincon Road
B/C ANALYSIS SUMMARY
B/C Analysis
The B/C analysis compares the performance measures of the proposed signal and roundabout alternatives to the existing AWSC. The traffic signal and roundabout alternatives have a B/C ratio greater than 1.0, which indicates that both alternatives will provide a return on investment compared to the existing AWSC. The first stage of B/C analysis compares all proposed alternatives to the No Build (AWSC) intersection control.
The added benefits were calculated by subtracting the discounted life-cycle costs of the proposed intersection control by the discounted life-cycle costs of the existing control. A positive value indicates that the proposed intersection will provide a benefit for that performance measure. The added benefits of safety and delay are summed to create the total added benefits for the proposed intersection. The added costs were calculated by subtracting the discounted life-cycle costs of the existing intersection by the discounted life-cycle costs of the proposed control. A positive value indicates that the proposed intersection will have additional costs associated with it. The added costs of O&M and ICC are summed to create the total added costs for the proposed intersection. The following equation illustrates the B/C ratio and Table 5 provides the description of B/C ratio scoring. The summary results of the B/C analysis at the study intersection are summarized in Table 6.
𝐁⁄𝐂Ratio Score =
∑ 𝐁𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐟𝐢𝐭 𝐏𝐞𝐫𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐌𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐮𝐫𝐞𝐬
∑ 𝐂𝐨𝐬𝐭 𝐏𝐞𝐫𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐌𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐮𝐫𝐞𝐬
Table 5: Description of B/C Ratio Scoring
B/C Ratio Score Description
B/C = 1.00 A B/C ratio of 1.00 is a neutral rating. This indicates that the ROI for existing signal is equal to improved signal/roundabout.
B/C < 1.00 A B/C ratio less than 1.00 indicates that the existing signal will provide a better ROI when compared to improved signal/roundabout.
B/C > 1.00 A B/C ratio greater than 1.00 indicates that improved signal/roundabout provides a better ROI when compared to the existing signal.
The B/C score is based on the net present value using a discount rate of 3.1% through the life-cycle duration of 20 years for each of the four performance measures.
Note: ROI=Return on Investment
Table 6: Summary of Life-Cycle B/C Analysis – Stage 1 B/C Ratios Total Benefits ( B )
Added Benefits Compared to AWSC No Build (AWSC) Signal Roundabout Safety $ - $ (2,177,214) $ (302,652)
Delay $ - $ 15,947,051 $ 18,104,744
Total Benefits $ - $ 13,769,837 $ 17,802,092
Total Costs ( C )
Added Cost Compared to Existing Conditions No Build (AWSC) Signal Roundabout O&M $ - $ 133,797 $ 9,445
Initial Capital $ - $ 2,250,000 $ 3,000,000
Total Costs $ - $2,383,797 $ 3,009,445
B/C Ratio Compared to Existing Conditions - 5.78 5.92
TOTAL PROJECT LIFE CYCLE SUMMARY FOR 20 YEARS
ICE – Yucca Loma Road at Rincon Road
The calculated B/C ratios in Table 6 compare each alternative to the existing intersection control and identify if the proposed intersection control is preferred or not. Both proposed improvements have a B/C greater than 1.0; therefore, each alternative would provide a better return on investment than the No Build (AWSC) intersection. A second stage B/C analysis was performed to determine the preferred alternative intersection control type between the top two proposed alternatives (traffic signal and roundabout). Added benefits and costs were calculated by directly comparing the two proposed improvements to each other.
Table 7 summarizes the comparison between the traffic signal and a roundabout for the Stage 2 B/C analysis. Comparing the traffic signal to the roundabout alternative resulted in a B/C ratio of 6.44. This indicates that the roundabout alternative is preferable when compared to the traffic signal alternative.
Table 7: Summary of Life-Cycle B/C Analysis – Stage 2 B/C Ratios Figure 10 shows the accumulated cost for each proposed alternative of all four performance measures.
Although the traffic signal has lower initial capital cost, the roundabout provides greater benefit resulting in lower accumulated costs throughout the minimum 20-year life span. Based on the 20-year projection, traffic signal and roundabout alternatives will have similar accumulated costs around the 5th year of operation; henceforth, the roundabout alternative provides greater return on investment.
Figure 10: Lifecycle Accumulated Costs
Total Benefits ( B )
Added Benefits Compared to Signal Signal Roundabout Net Difference Safety $ 4,318,790 $ 2,444,229 $ 1,874,561
Delay $ 4,664,754 $ 2,507,061 $ 2,157,694
Total Benefits $ 8,983,545 $ 4,951,290 $ 4,032,255
Total Costs ( C )
Added Cost Compared to Signal Signal Roundabout Net Difference O&M $ 143,242 $ 18,889 $ (124,353)
Initial Capital $ 2,250,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 750,000
Total Costs $2,393,242 $ 3,018,889 $ 625,647
B/C Ratio Compared to Signal 6.44
TOTAL PROJECT LIFE CYCLE SUMMARY FOR 20 YEARS
ICE – Yucca Loma Road at Rincon Road
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
An evaluation of the estimated benefit and cost performance measures indicate that, when forecast traffic volumes are considered for a minimum 20-year service life, a roundabout-controlled intersection is the preferred alternative at the intersection of Yucca Loma Road and Rincon Road. • The existing AWSC will have the longest delays and queue lengths out of all the intersection control alternatives at the study intersection.
• The roundabout alternative has the lowest life-cycle societal cost on delay. • The existing AWSC and the roundabout alternative have similar life-cycle societal cost on safety. • The existing AWSC and the roundabout alternative have similar life-cycle O&M costs. • The roundabout and traffic signal would have a greater return on investment compared to the existing AWSC over the lifecycle of the intersection.
• The roundabout alternative has an additional $4,032,255 benefit life-cycle cost compared to the traffic signal alternative.
• Apple Valley will start to see a positive return on investment from the roundabout compared to the traffic signal after 5 years.
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A – Traffic Volumes
Appendix B – Collision Memorandum
Appendix C – Signal Warrant
Appendix D – Layout Concept Exhibits
Appendix E – LOS Analysis – Synchro and Sidra
Appendix F – Description of Benefit Cost Performance Measures and Caltrans Cal B/C 2025 Value Comparison Table
Appendix A
Traffic Volumes
Yucca Loma Rd and Rincon Rd, Apple Valley, CA
Intersection Control Evaluation
2025
Vehicles 132 116 13 20 397 15 22 94 104 73 302 32
PHF 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 Truck % 2% 2% 8% 5% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 4% 9%
2025
Vehicles 33 78 9 11 405 23 25 83 112 148 457 60
PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Truck % 2% 2% 2% 9% 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%
2045
Vehicles 191 168 19 29 576 22 32 136 151 106 438 46
PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Truck % 2% 2% 8% 5% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 4% 9%
2045
Vehicles 48 113 13 16 587 33 36 120 162 215 663 87
PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Truck % 2% 2% 2% 9% 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%
NOTE: Minimum PHF used in operations analysis is =0.70
PM NB WB SB EB
AM NB WB SB EB
NOTE: Minimum PHF used in operations analysis is =0.70
Horizon Year (2045)
PM NB WB SB EB
Yucca Loma Road and Rincon Road
(Volume Date 2025)
Existing Year (2025)
AM NB WB SB EB
Appendix B
Historical Collision Memorandum
Collision Analysis – Yucca Loma Road at Rincon Road
Collision Analysis for
Yucca Loma Road at Rincon Road in Apple valley, CA
INTRODUCTION
A collision analysis was completed for the intersection of Yucca Loma Road and Rincon Road (the “study intersection”) in Apple Valley, California. The most recent available five (5) year injury collision history (2020-2024) was evaluated to identify patterns of collision types. The collisions were then analyzed for any trends that can be addressed through engineering design.
COLLISIONS & TRENDS
There were three broadside injury collisions at the Yucca Loma Road and Rincon Road intersection between 2020 – 2024. Details are provided in the table below:
Collision
Date
Collision
Severity
Number
Injured
Primary
Collision Factor
PCF Violation
Category
Type of
Collision
Lighting
2/5/2020 Possible
Injury /
Complaint
of Pain
3 Code Violation
(Vehicle) Traffic Signals
and Signs Broadside
Daylight
12/6/2023 1
Dark –
Street Lights
4/18/2024 1
Dark –
No Street Lights
All-Way Stop Control
While all-way stop intersections are designed to manage traffic flow and enhance safety by requiring all vehicles to stop and proceed only when it is safe, broadside collisions can still occur at all-way stops due to several factors:
1. Failure to Observe Right-of-Way Rules
a. Miscommunication: Drivers may misinterpret or fail to communicate their intentions, leading to confusion about who has the right-of-way.
b. Aggressive Driving: Some drivers may aggressively assert their right-of-way, leading to conflicts with other drivers who may also believe they have the right-of-way. c. Rolling Stops: Some drivers may perform rolling stops, where they slow down but do not fully stop, increasing the risk of broadside collisions.
2. Limited Visibility
a. Poor Lighting: At night or in poor weather conditions, visibility can be further reduced, increasing the risk of broadside collisions.
3. Inadequate Signage
a. Poor Signage: Inadequate or poorly placed stop signs can contribute to drivers failing to stop or yield appropriately.
b. Lack of Warning: Without sufficient warning signs indicating the presence of a stop sign ahead, drivers may not have enough time to react and stop safely.
4. High Traffic Volume
a. Congestion: High traffic volume can lead to congestion at all-way stop intersections, increasing the likelihood of driver frustration and errors. b. Complex Maneuvers: The need to navigate through heavy traffic can lead to complex maneuvers and increased risk of collisions.
As evidence by the collisions, all-way stop intersections can experience broadside collisions due to factors
Collision Analysis – Yucca Loma Road at Rincon Road
such as failure to observe right-of-way rules, driver distraction, limited visibility, inadequate signage, and high traffic volume. These factors can combine to create situations where broadside collisions are more likely to occur.
Traffic Signal
Traffic signals may reduce the risk of broadside collisions at intersections by:
1. Controlled Traffic Flow
a. Signal Phases: Traffic signals control the flow of vehicles by assigning specific times for different directions to move. This organized flow reduces the likelihood of vehicles crossing paths at right angles, which is a common cause of broadside collisions. b. Clear Indications: Red, yellow, and green lights provide clear and unambiguous instructions to drivers, reducing confusion and the potential for accidents.
2. Right-of-Way Management
a. Designated Turns: Traffic signals often include dedicated phases for left and right turns, which help manage the right-of-way and prevent vehicles from turning across the path of oncoming traffic.
b. Protected Turn Signals: Protected left-turn signals (green arrows) allow vehicles to turn left without conflicting with oncoming traffic, significantly reducing the risk of broadside collisions.
3. Reduced Speed at Intersections
a. Speed Control: Traffic signals naturally slow down traffic as vehicles must stop and wait for their turn to proceed. This reduction in speed decreases the severity of any collisions that do occur.
b. Yellow Light Warning: The yellow light provides a warning to drivers to prepare to stop, reducing the likelihood of vehicles entering the intersection at high speeds.
4. Coordination and Synchronization
a. Signal Coordination: In urban areas, traffic signals are often coordinated to create a smooth flow of traffic along major corridors. This reduces the stop-and-go conditions that can lead to sudden accelerations and potential broadside collisions.
Traffic signals may enhance intersection safety by controlling traffic flow, managing right-of-way, reducing vehicle speeds, and coordinating signal timing. These measures collectively help to prevent broadside collisions and improve overall traffic safety.
Roundabout
One of the key safety benefits of roundabouts is their ability to significantly reduce the likelihood of broadside collisions, in addition to lowering vehicle speed and reducing conflict points.
1. Reduced Conflict Points
a. Traditional Intersections: At a standard four-way intersection, there are 32 potential conflict points where vehicles can collide, including 8 points for broadside collisions. b. Roundabouts: In contrast, roundabouts reduce the number of conflict points to 8, and none of these are broadside conflict points. The design of roundabouts eliminates the possibility of right-angle collisions.
2. Lower Speeds
a. Speed Control: Roundabouts are designed to slow down traffic. Vehicles must reduce their speed to navigate the circular path, typically to around 15-20 mph (24-32 km/h). Lower speeds reduce the severity of any collisions that do occur. b. Speed Consistency: The continuous flow of traffic at a controlled speed reduces the
Collision Analysis – Yucca Loma Road at Rincon Road
chances of high-speed impacts, which are common in broadside collisions at traditional intersections.
3. Yield-at-Entry
a. Yielding: Vehicles entering a roundabout must yield to the traffic already circulating within it. This rule ensures that drivers are more cautious and aware of other vehicles, reducing the likelihood of sudden, unexpected movements that can lead to broadside collisions. b. Predictable Movements: The yielding process creates a more predictable traffic pattern, as all vehicles move in the same direction and at similar speeds.
4. Angle of Impact
a. Deflection: The circular design of roundabouts deflects vehicles, changing the angle of potential collisions. Instead of right-angle impacts, any collisions that occur are more likely to be low-angle sideswipes, which are generally less severe. b. Visibility: The central island and the curvature of the roundabout improve visibility, allowing drivers to see other vehicles more clearly and react accordingly.
Roundabouts enhance safety by reducing conflict points, controlling vehicle speeds, enforcing yielding behavior, altering the angle of potential impacts, and maintaining a continuous flow of traffic. These design features collectively contribute to a significant reduction in the likelihood and severity of broadside collisions.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
In comparing the efficacy of a traffic signal and a roundabout to reduce broadside collisions, each intersection control type presents distinct benefits and limitations. The existing all-way stop may operate effectively in low to moderate traffic volumes but may not perform well under high traffic volumes, as can be seen by the existing collisions. Traffic signals, while more efficient in managing higher traffic volumes than an AWSC, can reduce broadside collisions but may increase other types of collisions such as rear-end collisions. Traffic signals will not prevent drivers from running red lights, however, and thus may have a reduced impact on preventing broadside collisions. Roundabouts, however, consistently demonstrate a significant reduction in broadside collisions due to their design which naturally slows down traffic and eliminates crossing traffic paths, thus reducing the potential for severe collisions.
Attachment C
Signal Warrant
Intersection: Yucca Loma Rd and Rincon Rd
07:00 AM TO 08:00 AM 769 213 Yes
08:00 AM TO 09:00 AM 845 191 Yes
09:00 AM TO 10:00 AM 724 138 Yes
10:00 AM TO 11:00 AM 688 143 Yes
11:00 AM TO 12:00 PM 751 174 Yes
12:00 PM TO 01:00 PM 903 200 Yes
01:00 PM TO 02:00 PM 928 202 Yes
02:00 PM TO 03:00 PM 998 215 Yes
03:00 PM TO 04:00 PM 973 189 Yes
04:00 PM TO 05:00 PM 1063 190 Yes
05:00 PM TO 06:00 PM 1094 242 Yes
06:00 PM TO 07:00 PM 895 133 Yes
Identifed
Scenario In
Table 4C-1
Met?
Quantity Met
12 Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet
Warrant 1: 8-Hour Warrant
Source: MUTCD 2012 California Supplement
24-Hour Volume Summary
Major Street Minor Street
Total of Both
Approaches
Higher Volume
Approach
Comments: With the presence of left-turn lanes in the WB/EB directions, 2 Lanes were used in this analysis.
The speed of the major street (45 mph) is greater than the 40 mph threshold; therefore, the 70% minorstreet volume column was used in this analysis per CA MUTCD Section 4C.02.05.
Intersection: Rancheros Drive and WB SR 78 On/Off-Ramp
07:00 AM TO 08:00 AM 769 213 Yes
08:00 AM TO 09:00 AM 845 191 Yes
09:00 AM TO 10:00 AM 724 138 Yes
10:00 AM TO 11:00 AM 688 143 Yes
11:00 AM TO 12:00 PM 751 174 Yes
12:00 PM TO 01:00 PM 903 200 Yes
01:00 PM TO 02:00 PM 928 202 Yes
02:00 PM TO 03:00 PM 998 215 Yes
03:00 PM TO 04:00 PM 973 189 Yes
04:00 PM TO 05:00 PM 1063 190 Yes
05:00 PM TO 06:00 PM 1094 242 Yes
06:00 PM TO 07:00 PM 895 133 Yes
*Bolded maximum 4-hour volumes identified on Figure 4C-1 graph below Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet
Warrant 2: 4-Hour Warrant
Source: MUTCD 2012 California Supplement
Comments: With the presence of left-turn lanes in the WB/EB directions, 2 Lanes were used in this analysis. 24-Hour Volume Summary
Major Street* Minor Street* Identifed
Scenario In
Figure 4C-1
Met?
Quantity Met
12 Total of Both
Approaches
Higher Volume
Approach
4/10/2025
Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet
Warrant 3: Peak Hour
Source: MUTCD 2012 California Supplement
Scenario: AM
Intersection: Yucca Loma Rd AND Rincon Rd
PART A or PART B SATISFIED YES
PART A
(All parts 1, 2, and 3 below must be satisfied) SATISFIED NO
1. No
2. Yes
3. Yes
PART B SATISFIED YES
APPROACH LANES One
Both Approaches - Major Street 839
Highest Approache - Minor Street 261
1397 593 82 8
571 1326 56 4
Apple Valley - Yucca Loma Rd and Rincon Rd
The plotted points for vehicles per hour on major streets (both approaches) and the corresponding per hour higher volume minor street approach (one direction only) for one hour (any consecutive 15 minute period) fall above applicable curves in MUTCD Figure 4C-3.
Comments: With the presence of left-turn lanes in the WB/EB directions, 2 Lanes were used in this analysis.
The total delay experienced for traffic on one minor street approach controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one-lane approach and five vehicle hours for a two-lane approach; AND
The volume on the same minor street approach equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vph for two moving lanes; AND The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersection with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersection with less than four approaches.
2 or More
4/10/2025
Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet
Warrant 3: Peak Hour
Source: MUTCD 2012 California Supplement
Scenario: PM
Intersection: Yucca Loma Rd AND Rincon Rd
PART A or PART B SATISFIED YES
PART A
(All parts 1, 2, and 3 below must be satisfied) SATISFIED NO
1. No
2. Yes
3. Yes
PART B SATISFIED YES
APPROACH LANES One
Both Approaches - Major Street 1104
Highest Approache - Minor Street 220
1397 593 82 8
571 1326 56 4
Apple Valley - Yucca Loma Rd and Rincon Rd
The plotted points for vehicles per hour on major streets (both approaches) and the corresponding per hour higher volume minor street approach (one direction only) for one hour (any consecutive 15 minute period) fall above applicable curves in MUTCD Figure 4C-3.
Comments: With the presence of left-turn lanes in the WB/EB directions, 2 Lanes were used in this analysis.
The total delay experienced for traffic on one minor street approach controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one-lane approach and five vehicle hours for a two-lane approach; AND The volume on the same minor street approach equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vph for two moving lanes; AND The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersection with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersection with less than four approaches.
2 or More
Attachment D
Layout Concept Exhibits
Attachment E
LOS Analysis – Synchro and Sidra
Yucca Loma Rd @ Rincon Rd Existing (2025)
3: Rincon Rd & Yucca Loma Rd Timing Plan: AM Peak
HCM 7th AWSC Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 51
Intersection LOS F
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 73 302 32 20 397 15 132 116 13 22 94 104 Future Vol, veh/h 73 302 32 20 397 15 132 116 13 22 94 104 Peak Hour Factor 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 4 9 5 2 2 2 2 8 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 84 347 37 23 456 17 152 133 15 25 108 120
Number of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 2 2 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 2 2
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 2 2
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 40.2 88.4 29.7 23.1
HCM LOS E F D C
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 EBLn2 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 51% 100% 0% 100% 0% 10%
Vol Thru, % 44% 0% 90% 0% 96% 43%
Vol Right, % 5% 0% 10% 0% 4% 47%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 261 73 334 20 412 220
LT Vol 132 73 0 20 0 22
Through Vol 116 0 302 0 397 94
RT Vol 13 0 32 0 15 104
Lane Flow Rate 300 84 384 23 474 253
Geometry Grp 2 5 5 5 5 2
Degree of Util (X) 0.7 0.202 0.867 0.056 1.072 0.584
Departure Headway (Hd) 8.716 9 8.444 8.75 8.151 8.672
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 417 401 434 409 445 420
Service Time 6.716 6.7 6.144 6.508 5.909 6.672
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.719 0.209 0.885 0.056 1.065 0.602
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 29.7 14 45.9 12 92.1 23.1
HCM Lane LOS D B E B F C
HCM 95th-tile Q 5.2 0.7 8.8 0.2 15.4 3.6
Yucca Loma Rd @ Rincon Rd Existing (2025)
3: Rincon Rd & Yucca Loma Rd Timing Plan: AM Peak
Queues Synchro 12 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 84 384 23 473 152 148 25 228
v/c Ratio 0.49 0.50 0.14 0.79 0.74 0.22 0.15 0.58
Control Delay (s/veh) 38.8 16.1 27.8 30.3 53.1 15.0 27.9 19.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 38.8 16.1 27.8 30.3 53.1 15.0 27.9 19.7 Queue Length 50th (ft) 28 75 7 141 51 31 8 44
Queue Length 95th (ft) #83 #210 27 #304 #147 80 28 94
Internal Link Dist (ft) 782 1071 703 490
Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 275 200 200
Base Capacity (vph) 170 824 165 664 205 719 170 668
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.49 0.47 0.14 0.71 0.74 0.21 0.15 0.34 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Yucca Loma Rd @ Rincon Rd Existing (2025)
3: Rincon Rd & Yucca Loma Rd Timing Plan: AM Peak
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 12 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 73 302 32 20 397 15 132 116 13 22 94 104 Future Volume (veh/h) 73 302 32 20 397 15 132 116 13 22 94 104 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1841 1767 1826 1870 1870 1870 1870 1781 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 84 347 37 23 456 17 152 133 15 25 108 120 Peak Hour Factor 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 4 9 5 2 2 2 2 8 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 123 560 60 48 539 20 193 431 49 52 147 164
Arrive On Green 0.07 0.34 0.34 0.03 0.30 0.30 0.11 0.26 0.26 0.03 0.18 0.18 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1635 174 1739 1792 67 1781 1651 186 1781 809 899 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 84 0 384 23 0 473 152 0 148 25 0 228 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1809 1739 0 1858 1781 0 1837 1781 0 1709 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.3 0.0 8.9 0.7 0.0 11.9 4.2 0.0 3.2 0.7 0.0 6.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.3 0.0 8.9 0.7 0.0 11.9 4.2 0.0 3.2 0.7 0.0 6.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.10 1.00 0.04 1.00 0.10 1.00 0.53
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 123 0 619 48 0 559 193 0 479 52 0 311 V/C Ratio(X) 0.68 0.00 0.62 0.48 0.00 0.85 0.79 0.00 0.31 0.48 0.00 0.73 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 178 0 669 174 0 688 214 0 716 178 0 632 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 22.8 0.0 13.7 24.0 0.0 16.4 21.7 0.0 14.9 23.9 0.0 19.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 6.6 0.0 1.6 7.4 0.0 8.1 16.2 0.0 0.4 6.6 0.0 3.3 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.0 0.0 3.0 0.3 0.0 5.1 2.3 0.0 1.1 0.3 0.0 2.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 29.3 0.0 15.3 31.4 0.0 24.5 38.0 0.0 15.2 30.5 0.0 22.6 LnGrp LOS C B C C D B C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 468 496 300 253
Approach Delay, s/veh 17.8 24.8 26.7 23.4
Approach LOS B C C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.0 17.1 5.9 21.1 9.9 13.1 7.9 19.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 19.5 5.0 18.5 6.0 18.5 5.0 18.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.7 5.2 2.7 10.9 6.2 8.3 4.3 13.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.5 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.8 0.0 1.1 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 22.8
HCM 7th LOS C
LANE SUMMARY
Site: 1 [Yucca Loma Rd_Rincon Rd_2025_AM_Alt00 (Site
Folder: Alt00)]
Output produced by SIDRA INTERSECTION Version: 9.1.1.200 New Site
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
Demand Flows Arrival Flows 95% Back Of
Cap. Queue
Deg.
Satn
Lane
Util.
Aver.
Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.
Adj.
Prob.
Block.
[ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
South: NB_Rincon Rd
Lane 1d 298 2.3 298 2.3 827 0.360 100 8.5 LOS A 1.8 44.6 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 298 2.3 298 2.3 0.360 8.5 LOS A 1.8 44.6
East: WB_Yucca Loma Rd
Lane 1d 494 2.1 494 2.1 916 0.539 100 11.0 LOS B 4.4 112.5 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 494 2.1 494 2.1 0.539 11.0 LOS B 4.4 112.5
North: SB_Rincon Rd
Lane 1d 251 2.0 251 2.0 695 0.362 100 9.8 LOS A 1.8 44.6 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 251 2.0 251 2.0 0.362 9.8 LOS A 1.8 44.6
West: EB_Yucca Loma Rd
Lane 1d 465 4.0 465 4.0 1124 0.414 100 7.4 LOS A 2.5 64.7 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 465 4.0 465 4.0 0.414 7.4 LOS A 2.5 64.7
All
Vehicles
1509 2.7 1509 2.7 0.539 9.2 LOS A 4.4 112.5
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Options tab).
Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.
Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.
LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).
Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).
Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.
Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Stopline Delay: Geometric Delay is not included).
Queue Model: SIDRA queue estimation methods are used for Back of Queue and Queue at Start of Gap.
Gap-Acceptance Capacity Formula: Siegloch M1 implied by US HCM 6 Roundabout Capacity Model.
HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation.
Arrival Flows used in performance calculations are adjusted to include any Initial Queued Demand and Upstream Capacity Constraint effects.
d Dominant lane on roundabout approach
SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.1 | Copyright © 2000-2022 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES INC | Licence: NETWORK / Enterprise Level 2 | Processed: Wednesday, April 2, 2025 4:20:35 PM Project: K:\SAC_RDWY\Apple Valley\03 Analysis Files\Sidra Files\Apple Valley_Yucca Loma_Rincon RAB.sip9
Yucca Loma Rd @ Rincon Rd Existing (2025)
3: Rincon Rd & Yucca Loma Rd Timing Plan: PM Peak
HCM 7th AWSC Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 43.9
Intersection LOS E
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 148 457 60 11 405 23 33 78 9 25 83 112 Future Vol, veh/h 148 457 60 11 405 23 33 78 9 25 83 112 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 9 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 156 481 63 12 426 24 35 82 9 26 87 118
Number of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 2 2 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 2 2
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 2 2
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 59.7 41.6 14.4 16.7
HCM LOS F E B C
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 EBLn2 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 28% 100% 0% 100% 0% 11%
Vol Thru, % 65% 0% 88% 0% 94% 38%
Vol Right, % 8% 0% 12% 0% 5% 51%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 120 148 517 10 429 220
LT Vol 33 148 0 10 1 25
Through Vol 78 0 457 0 405 83
RT Vol 9 0 60 0 23 112
Lane Flow Rate 126 156 544 10 452 232
Geometry Grp 2 5 5 5 5 2
Degree of Util (X) 0.281 0.321 1.03 0.022 0.877 0.462
Departure Headway (Hd) 8.209 7.409 6.813 7.87 7.214 7.444 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 441 488 533 458 506 486
Service Time 6.209 5.116 4.52 5.57 4.914 5.444
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.286 0.32 1.021 0.022 0.893 0.477
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 14.4 13.6 72.9 10.7 42.3 16.7
HCM Lane LOS B B F B E C
HCM 95th-tile Q 1.1 1.4 15.3 0.1 9.5 2.4
Yucca Loma Rd @ Rincon Rd Existing (2025)
3: Rincon Rd & Yucca Loma Rd Timing Plan: PM Peak
Queues Synchro 12 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 156 544 12 450 35 91 26 205
v/c Ratio 0.48 0.56 0.06 0.67 0.17 0.25 0.13 0.50
Control Delay (s/veh) 30.6 13.9 27.5 23.0 28.5 20.5 28.0 16.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 30.6 13.9 27.5 23.0 28.5 20.5 28.0 16.6 Queue Length 50th (ft) 39 56 3 97 9 20 7 26
Queue Length 95th (ft) #140 #350 19 #302 39 62 32 91
Internal Link Dist (ft) 782 1071 703 490
Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 275 200 200
Base Capacity (vph) 348 1161 191 872 205 812 205 803
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.45 0.47 0.06 0.52 0.17 0.11 0.13 0.26 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Yucca Loma Rd @ Rincon Rd Existing (2025)
3: Rincon Rd & Yucca Loma Rd Timing Plan: PM Peak
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 12 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 148 457 60 11 405 23 33 78 9 25 83 112 Future Volume (veh/h) 148 457 60 11 405 23 33 78 9 25 83 112 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1767 1856 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 156 481 63 12 426 24 35 82 9 26 87 118 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 9 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 201 650 85 26 528 30 70 302 33 55 125 170
Arrive On Green 0.11 0.40 0.40 0.02 0.30 0.30 0.04 0.18 0.18 0.03 0.17 0.17 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1620 212 1682 1740 98 1781 1656 182 1781 719 976 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 156 0 544 12 0 450 35 0 91 26 0 205 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1832 1682 0 1838 1781 0 1838 1781 0 1695 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.9 0.0 11.6 0.3 0.0 10.4 0.9 0.0 2.0 0.7 0.0 5.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.9 0.0 11.6 0.3 0.0 10.4 0.9 0.0 2.0 0.7 0.0 5.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.05 1.00 0.10 1.00 0.58
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 201 0 735 26 0 558 70 0 335 55 0 295 V/C Ratio(X) 0.78 0.00 0.74 0.46 0.00 0.81 0.50 0.00 0.27 0.47 0.00 0.70 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 330 0 958 183 0 821 194 0 761 194 0 701 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 19.8 0.0 11.7 22.4 0.0 14.7 21.6 0.0 16.1 21.9 0.0 17.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 6.3 0.0 2.2 12.2 0.0 3.8 5.5 0.0 0.4 6.3 0.0 2.9 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.7 0.0 3.6 0.2 0.0 3.7 0.4 0.0 0.7 0.3 0.0 1.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 26.1 0.0 13.9 34.6 0.0 18.5 27.1 0.0 16.6 28.1 0.0 20.8 LnGrp LOS C B C B C B C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 700 462 126 231
Approach Delay, s/veh 16.6 18.9 19.5 21.6
Approach LOS B B B C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 5.9 12.4 5.2 22.4 6.3 12.0 9.7 17.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 19.0 5.0 24.0 5.0 19.0 8.5 20.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.7 4.0 2.3 13.6 2.9 7.2 5.9 12.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.3 0.0 2.3 0.0 0.8 0.1 1.6 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 18.3
HCM 7th LOS B
LANE SUMMARY
Site: 1 [Yucca Loma Rd_Rincon Rd_2025_PM_Alt00 (Site
Folder: Alt00)]
Output produced by SIDRA INTERSECTION Version: 9.1.1.200 New Site
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
Demand Flows Arrival Flows 95% Back Of
Cap. Queue
Deg.
Satn
Lane
Util.
Aver.
Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.
Adj.
Prob.
Block.
[ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
South: NB_Rincon Rd
Lane 1d 126 2.0 126 2.0 669 0.189 100 7.5 LOS A 0.8 19.3 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 126 2.0 126 2.0 0.189 7.5 LOS A 0.8 19.3
East: WB_Yucca Loma Rd
Lane 1d 462 3.1 462 3.1 1002 0.461 100 8.8 LOS A 2.7 70.2 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 462 3.1 462 3.1 0.461 8.8 LOS A 2.7 70.2
North: SB_Rincon Rd
Lane 1d 232 2.0 232 2.0 816 0.284 100 7.5 LOS A 1.3 33.0 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 232 2.0 232 2.0 0.284 7.5 LOS A 1.3 33.0
West: EB_Yucca Loma Rd
Lane 1d 700 2.0 700 2.0 1186 0.590 100 9.9 LOS A 4.9 125.5 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 700 2.0 700 2.0 0.590 9.9 LOS A 4.9 125.5
All
Vehicles
1520 2.3 1520 2.3 0.590 9.0 LOS A 4.9 125.5
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Options tab).
Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.
Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.
LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).
Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).
Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.
Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Stopline Delay: Geometric Delay is not included).
Queue Model: SIDRA queue estimation methods are used for Back of Queue and Queue at Start of Gap.
Gap-Acceptance Capacity Formula: Siegloch M1 implied by US HCM 6 Roundabout Capacity Model.
HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation.
Arrival Flows used in performance calculations are adjusted to include any Initial Queued Demand and Upstream Capacity Constraint effects.
d Dominant lane on roundabout approach
SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.1 | Copyright © 2000-2022 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES INC | Licence: NETWORK / Enterprise Level 2 | Processed: Wednesday, April 2, 2025 4:20:54 PM Project: K:\SAC_RDWY\Apple Valley\03 Analysis Files\Sidra Files\Apple Valley_Yucca Loma_Rincon RAB.sip9
Yucca Loma Rd @ Rincon Rd Horizon (2045)
3: Rincon Rd & Yucca Loma Rd Timing Plan: AM Peak
HCM 7th AWSC Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 202
Intersection LOS F
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 106 438 46 29 576 22 191 168 19 32 136 151 Future Vol, veh/h 106 438 46 29 576 22 191 168 19 32 136 151 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 4 9 5 2 2 2 2 8 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 115 476 50 32 626 24 208 183 21 35 148 164
Number of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 2 2 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 2 2
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 2 2
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 185.2 342 110.2 66.4
HCM LOS F F F F
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 EBLn2 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 51% 100% 0% 100% 0% 10%
Vol Thru, % 44% 0% 90% 0% 96% 43%
Vol Right, % 5% 0% 10% 0% 4% 47%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 378 106 484 29 598 319
LT Vol 191 106 0 29 0 32
Through Vol 168 0 438 0 576 136
RT Vol 19 0 46 0 22 151
Lane Flow Rate 411 115 526 32 650 347
Geometry Grp 2 5 5 5 5 2
Degree of Util (X) 1.076 0.32 1.385 0.088 1.714 0.896
Departure Headway (Hd) 12.005 11.887 11.319 11.093 10.482 12.39 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 304 304 326 325 351 295
Service Time 10.005 9.587 9.019 8.793 8.182 10.39
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 1.352 0.378 1.613 0.098 1.852 1.176
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 110.2 20.1 221.3 14.9 357.9 66.4 HCM Lane LOS F C F B F F
HCM 95th-tile Q 12.5 1.3 22.6 0.3 36.7 8.2
Yucca Loma Rd @ Rincon Rd Horizon (2045)
3: Rincon Rd & Yucca Loma Rd Timing Plan: AM Peak
Queues Synchro 12 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 115 526 32 650 208 204 35 312
v/c Ratio 0.74 0.65 0.31 0.94 0.83 0.34 0.29 0.81
Control Delay (s/veh) 68.8 25.0 48.9 50.8 64.8 25.0 46.1 44.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 68.8 25.0 48.9 50.8 64.8 25.0 46.1 44.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) 65 243 18 348 116 88 19 136
Queue Length 95th (ft) #156 374 47 #581 #238 150 50 #252 Internal Link Dist (ft) 782 1071 703 490
Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 275 200 200
Base Capacity (vph) 155 808 103 719 259 598 125 446
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.74 0.65 0.31 0.90 0.80 0.34 0.28 0.70 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Yucca Loma Rd @ Rincon Rd Horizon (2045)
3: Rincon Rd & Yucca Loma Rd Timing Plan: AM Peak
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 12 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 106 438 46 29 576 22 191 168 19 32 136 151 Future Volume (veh/h) 106 438 46 29 576 22 191 168 19 32 136 151 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1841 1767 1826 1870 1870 1870 1870 1781 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 115 476 50 32 626 24 208 183 21 35 148 164 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 4 9 5 2 2 2 2 8 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 145 693 73 54 667 26 245 512 59 59 168 186
Arrive On Green 0.08 0.42 0.42 0.03 0.37 0.37 0.14 0.31 0.31 0.03 0.21 0.21 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1638 172 1739 1789 69 1781 1647 189 1781 811 898 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 115 0 526 32 0 650 208 0 204 35 0 312 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1810 1739 0 1858 1781 0 1836 1781 0 1709 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.3 0.0 19.9 1.5 0.0 28.4 9.6 0.0 7.3 1.6 0.0 14.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.3 0.0 19.9 1.5 0.0 28.4 9.6 0.0 7.3 1.6 0.0 14.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.10 1.00 0.04 1.00 0.10 1.00 0.53
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 145 0 766 54 0 693 245 0 571 59 0 353 V/C Ratio(X) 0.79 0.00 0.69 0.59 0.00 0.94 0.85 0.00 0.36 0.59 0.00 0.88 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 158 0 766 105 0 727 264 0 577 127 0 405 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 38.0 0.0 19.8 40.3 0.0 25.5 35.5 0.0 22.5 40.2 0.0 32.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 22.1 0.0 2.6 9.7 0.0 19.3 21.2 0.0 0.4 9.1 0.0 18.3 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 3.1 0.0 7.9 0.8 0.0 14.8 5.4 0.0 2.9 0.8 0.0 7.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 60.1 0.0 22.4 50.0 0.0 44.8 56.7 0.0 22.9 49.3 0.0 50.7 LnGrp LOS E C D D E C D D
Approach Vol, veh/h 641 682 412 347
Approach Delay, s/veh 29.1 45.1 40.0 50.6
Approach LOS C D D D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.3 30.2 7.1 39.7 16.1 21.4 11.4 35.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.0 26.5 5.1 35.4 12.5 20.0 7.5 33.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.6 9.3 3.5 21.9 11.6 16.9 7.3 30.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.9 0.0 2.6 0.1 0.5 0.0 1.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 40.1
HCM 7th LOS D
LANE SUMMARY
Site: 1 [Yucca Loma Rd_Rincon Rd_2045_AM_Alt00 (Site
Folder: Alt00)]
Output produced by SIDRA INTERSECTION Version: 9.1.1.200 New Site
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
Demand Flows Arrival Flows 95% Back Of
Cap. Queue
Deg.
Satn
Lane
Util.
Aver.
Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.
Adj.
Prob.
Block.
[ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
South: NB_Rincon Rd
Lane 1d 411 2.3 411 2.3 686 0.599 100 15.6 LOS C 4.5 115.3 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 411 2.3 411 2.3 0.599 15.6 LOS C 4.5 115.3
East: WB_Yucca Loma Rd
Lane 1d 682 2.1 682 2.1 790 0.862 100 29.2 LOS D 15.6 397.5 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 682 2.1 682 2.1 0.862 29.2 LOS D 15.6 397.5
North: SB_Rincon Rd
Lane 1d 347 2.0 347 2.0 539 0.643 100 20.9 LOS C 4.2 106.9 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 347 2.0 347 2.0 0.643 20.9 LOS C 4.2 106.9
West: EB_Yucca Loma Rd
Lane 1d 641 4.0 641 4.0 1055 0.608 100 11.3 LOS B 5.9 151.2 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 641 4.0 641 4.0 0.608 11.3 LOS B 5.9 151.2
All
Vehicles
2080 2.7 2080 2.7 0.862 19.6 LOS C 15.6 397.5
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Options tab).
Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.
Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.
LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).
Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).
Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.
Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Stopline Delay: Geometric Delay is not included).
Queue Model: SIDRA queue estimation methods are used for Back of Queue and Queue at Start of Gap.
Gap-Acceptance Capacity Formula: Siegloch M1 implied by US HCM 6 Roundabout Capacity Model.
HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation.
Arrival Flows used in performance calculations are adjusted to include any Initial Queued Demand and Upstream Capacity Constraint effects.
d Dominant lane on roundabout approach
SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.1 | Copyright © 2000-2022 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES INC | Licence: NETWORK / Enterprise Level 2 | Processed: Wednesday, April 2, 2025 4:23:30 PM Project: K:\SAC_RDWY\Apple Valley\03 Analysis Files\Sidra Files\Apple Valley_Yucca Loma_Rincon RAB.sip9
Yucca Loma Rd @ Rincon Rd Horizon (2045)
3: Rincon Rd & Yucca Loma Rd Timing Plan: PM Peak
HCM 7th AWSC Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 228.7
Intersection LOS F
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 215 663 87 16 587 33 48 113 13 36 120 162 Future Vol, veh/h 215 663 87 16 587 33 48 113 13 36 120 162 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 9 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 234 721 95 17 638 36 52 123 14 39 130 176
Number of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 2 2 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 2 2
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 2 2
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 306.5 262.3 23.8 37.8
HCM LOS F F C E
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 EBLn2 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 28% 100% 0% 100% 0% 11%
Vol Thru, % 65% 0% 88% 0% 95% 38%
Vol Right, % 7% 0% 12% 0% 5% 51%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 174 215 750 16 620 318
LT Vol 48 215 0 16 0 36
Through Vol 113 0 663 0 587 120
RT Vol 13 0 87 0 33 162
Lane Flow Rate 189 234 815 17 674 346
Geometry Grp 2 5 5 5 5 2
Degree of Util (X) 0.47 0.552 1.793 0.042 1.518 0.76
Departure Headway (Hd) 11.235 9.529 8.92 9.676 9.008 9.751 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 323 381 416 372 411 373
Service Time 9.235 7.229 6.62 7.376 6.708 7.751
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.585 0.614 1.959 0.046 1.64 0.928
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 23.8 23.4 387.6 12.8 268.7 37.8 HCM Lane LOS C C F B F E
HCM 95th-tile Q 2.4 3.2 45.9 0.1 32.8 6.1
Yucca Loma Rd @ Rincon Rd Horizon (2045)
3: Rincon Rd & Yucca Loma Rd Timing Plan: PM Peak
Queues Synchro 12 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 234 816 17 674 52 137 39 306
v/c Ratio 0.80 0.75 0.16 0.90 0.45 0.37 0.34 0.77
Control Delay (s/veh) 57.0 22.3 43.9 41.4 53.9 30.7 48.6 37.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 57.0 22.3 43.9 41.4 53.9 30.7 48.6 37.9 Queue Length 50th (ft) 127 296 9 349 28 62 21 124
Queue Length 95th (ft) #264 #678 31 #604 #76 115 54 216 Internal Link Dist (ft) 782 1071 703 490
Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 275 200 200
Base Capacity (vph) 304 1084 105 795 115 481 115 494
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.77 0.75 0.16 0.85 0.45 0.28 0.34 0.62 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Yucca Loma Rd @ Rincon Rd Horizon (2045)
3: Rincon Rd & Yucca Loma Rd Timing Plan: PM Peak
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 12 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 215 663 87 16 587 33 48 113 13 36 120 162 Future Volume (veh/h) 215 663 87 16 587 33 48 113 13 36 120 162 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1767 1856 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 234 721 95 17 638 36 52 123 14 39 130 176 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 9 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 272 849 112 33 681 38 75 351 40 64 149 201
Arrive On Green 0.15 0.52 0.52 0.02 0.39 0.39 0.04 0.21 0.21 0.04 0.21 0.21 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1619 213 1682 1740 98 1781 1649 188 1781 720 975 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 234 0 816 17 0 674 52 0 137 39 0 306 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1832 1682 0 1838 1781 0 1837 1781 0 1695 Q Serve(g_s), s 10.5 0.0 31.4 0.8 0.0 28.9 2.4 0.0 5.2 1.8 0.0 14.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 10.5 0.0 31.4 0.8 0.0 28.9 2.4 0.0 5.2 1.8 0.0 14.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.05 1.00 0.10 1.00 0.58
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 272 0 961 33 0 720 75 0 391 64 0 350 V/C Ratio(X) 0.86 0.00 0.85 0.52 0.00 0.94 0.69 0.00 0.35 0.61 0.00 0.87 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 293 0 961 102 0 761 111 0 456 111 0 421 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 34.0 0.0 16.7 39.9 0.0 24.0 38.8 0.0 27.5 39.0 0.0 31.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 21.0 0.0 7.3 11.9 0.0 18.4 10.7 0.0 0.5 9.1 0.0 15.9 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 5.8 0.0 12.7 0.4 0.0 14.7 1.2 0.0 2.2 0.9 0.0 7.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 55.0 0.0 24.0 51.8 0.0 42.4 49.5 0.0 28.0 48.1 0.0 47.5 LnGrp LOS D C D D D C D D
Approach Vol, veh/h 1050 691 189 345
Approach Delay, s/veh 30.9 42.6 33.9 47.6
Approach LOS C D C D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.4 21.5 6.1 47.1 8.0 21.0 17.0 36.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.1 20.4 5.0 42.5 5.1 20.4 13.5 34.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.8 7.2 2.8 33.4 4.4 16.4 12.5 30.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.5 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.6 0.1 1.2 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 37.2
HCM 7th LOS D
LANE SUMMARY
Site: 1 [Yucca Loma Rd_Rincon Rd_2045_PM_Alt00 (Site
Folder: Alt00)]
Output produced by SIDRA INTERSECTION Version: 9.1.1.200 New Site
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
Demand Flows Arrival Flows 95% Back Of
Cap. Queue
Deg.
Satn
Lane
Util.
Aver.
Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.
Adj.
Prob.
Block.
[ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
South: NB_Rincon Rd
Lane 1d 189 2.0 189 2.0 470 0.402 100 14.6 LOS B 1.8 44.9 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 189 2.0 189 2.0 0.402 14.6 LOS B 1.8 44.9
East: WB_Yucca Loma Rd
Lane 1d 691 3.1 691 3.1 865 0.799 100 21.8 LOS C 13.7 349.9 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 691 3.1 691 3.1 0.799 21.8 LOS C 13.7 349.9
North: SB_Rincon Rd
Lane 1d 346 2.0 346 2.0 633 0.546 100 14.9 LOS B 3.4 87.5 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 346 2.0 346 2.0 0.546 14.9 LOS B 3.4 87.5
West: EB_Yucca Loma Rd
Lane 1d 1049 2.0 1049 2.0 1110 0.945 100 31.7 LOS D 44.8 1138.8 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 1049 2.0 1049 2.0 0.945 31.7 LOS D 44.8 1138.8 All
Vehicles
2275 2.3 2275 2.3 0.945 24.7 LOS C 44.8 1138.8
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Options tab).
Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.
Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.
LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).
Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).
Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.
Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Stopline Delay: Geometric Delay is not included).
Queue Model: SIDRA queue estimation methods are used for Back of Queue and Queue at Start of Gap.
Gap-Acceptance Capacity Formula: Siegloch M1 implied by US HCM 6 Roundabout Capacity Model.
HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation.
Arrival Flows used in performance calculations are adjusted to include any Initial Queued Demand and Upstream Capacity Constraint effects.
d Dominant lane on roundabout approach
SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.1 | Copyright © 2000-2022 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES INC | Licence: NETWORK / Enterprise Level 2 | Processed: Wednesday, April 2, 2025 4:24:52 PM Project: K:\SAC_RDWY\Apple Valley\03 Analysis Files\Sidra Files\Apple Valley_Yucca Loma_Rincon RAB.sip9
Attachment F
Description of Benefit Cost Performance Measures and Caltrans Cal B/C 2025 Value Comparison Table
Real Discount Rate
Average Vehicle Occupancy
Statewide Average Hourly
Wage ($/hr)
Heavy and Light Truck Drivers
Average Hourly Wage ($/hr)
Heavy and Light Truck Drivers
Benefits and Costs ($/hr)
Automobile/Personal ($/hr/per)
Truck/Business ($/hr/veh)
Auto & Truck Composite/All
Purpose ($/hr/veh)
Transit/Transit Rail Operator
($/hr/per)
Automobile (regular unleaded)
($/gal)
Truck (diesel) ($/gal)
Automobile ($/mi)
Truck ($/mi)
Parameters are retreived from Caltrans Cal-B/C 2025 INFRA/RAISE Sketch Model v8.1 as identified within the spreadsheet listed on their website.
These values have been updated January 2025.
$4.33
$0.40
$0.49
$15.64
$21.10
$35.70
$28.15
$21.10
$4.27
Non-Fuel Cost Per Mile
Average Fuel Price
Cal-B/C Parameters
3.1 $36.89
Travel Time Parameters
1.51 $28.07
Cost of Fatality/Killed
Level A (Severe)/Incapacitating
Level B (Moderate)/Nonincapacitating
Level C (Minor)/Possible Injury
Cost of Property Damage (PDO)
Urban Suburban Rural
Fatal Crash 0.45% 0.73% 2.04%
Injury Crash 31.95% 33.13% 36.01%
PDO Crash 67.60% 66.14% 61.96%
Severe Injury (A) 5.12% 5.12% 5.12%
Other Visible Injury (B) 25.30% 25.30% 25.30%
Complaint of Pain (C) 69.57% 69.57% 69.57%
Urban Rural LA/South Coast
CO $100 $90 $190
CO2 $223 $223 $223
NOX $19,142 $19,142 $19,142
PM10 $917,264 $917,264 $917,264
SO2 $51,529 $51,529 $51,529
VOC $1,585 $1,245 $4,820
$118,000
$5,300
Pollutant Emissions
$13,200,000
$1,254,700
$246,900
Highway Injury Severity Frequency
Accident Cost Parameters
Accident Injury Parameters
Distribution of Crash Types
Total K A B C O
0.87% 2.01% 9.94% 27.32% 59.86% Predicted FI Frequency Predicted PDO Frequency
0.0123 0.0286 0.1411 0.3880 0.8500 0.5700 0.8500
K ABC PDO 0.75% 1.16% 5.72% 15.73% 76.65% CMF ABC 0.300
0.450 0.300 0.668 0.0055 0.0086 0.0423 0.1164 0.5674 0.74 CMF ALL 0.520 K ABC PDO 0.73% 1.70% 8.38% 23.05% 66.14%
0.801 0.801 1.050 0.0098 0.0229 0.1131 0.3109 0.8922 1.35 CMF ALL 0.950 K ABC PDO 0.73% 1.70% 8.38% 23.05% 66.14%
1.01 1.510 0.889 0.0056 0.0129 0.0639 0.1757 0.5043 0.76 CMF ALL 1.030
0.90% 2.08% 10.28% 28.28% 58.45% Predicted FI Frequency Predicted PDO Frequency
0.0185 0.0431 0.2129 0.5854 1.2100 0.8600 1.2100
K ABC PDO 0.77% 1.20% 5.92% 16.27% 75.84% CMF ABC 0.300
1.090 0.300 0.676 0.0084 0.0129 0.0639 0.1756 0.8184 1.08 CMF ALL 0.520 K ABC PDO 0.73% 1.70% 8.38% 23.05% 66.14%
0.774 0.774 1.075 0.0144 0.0334 0.1648 0.4532 1.3006 1.97 CMF ALL 0.950 K ABC PDO 1.06% 2.47% 12.22% 33.60% 96.43%
0.97 1.459 0.898 0.0081 0.0189 0.0932 0.2562 0.7352 1.11 CMF ALL 1.030 - -
AWSC 1.08
Signal 1.97
2045
SSSC 2.07
Roundabout 1.11
Yucca Loma and Rincon CMF
2025
SSSC 1.42 - -
AWSC 0.74
Signal 1.35
Roundabout 0.76
Interactive Highway Safety Design Model
Crash Prediction Evaluation Report
April 10, 2025
Disclaimer
The Interactive Highway Design Model (IHSDM) software is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its content or use thereof. This document does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.
The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade and manufacturers' names may appear in this software and documentation only because they are considered essential to the objective of the software.
Limited Warranty and Limitations of Remedies
This software product is provided "as-is," without warranty of any kind-either expressed or implied (but not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose). The FHWA do not warrant that the functions contained in the software will meet the end-user's requirements or that the operation of the software will be uninterrupted and error-free.
Under no circumstances will the FHWA be liable to the end-user for any damages or claimed lost profits, lost savings, or other incidental or consequential damages rising out of the use or inability to use the software (even if these organizations have been advised of the possibility of such damages), or for any claim by any other party.
Notice
The use of the IHSDM software is being done strictly on a voluntary basis. In exchange for provision of IHSDM, the user agrees that the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), U.S. Department of Transportation and any other agency of the Federal Government shall not be responsible for any errors, damage or other liability that may result from any and all use of the software, including installation and testing of the software. The user further agrees to hold the FHWA and the Federal Government harmless from any resulting liability. The user agrees that this hold harmless provision shall flow to any person to whom or any entity to which the user provides the IHSDM software. It is the user's full responsibility to inform any person to whom or any entity to which it provides the IHSDM software of this hold harmless provision.
Table of Contents
Report Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Disclaimer Regarding Crash Prediction Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Section Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Urban Arterial Site Set CPM Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 List of Tables
Table Evaluation and Crash Data (CSD) (if applicable) Intersection Sites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Table Predicted Crash Frequencies and Rates by Site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Table Predicted Crash Frequencies by Year (4ST) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Table Predicted 4ST Crash Type Distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 List of Tables Crash Prediction Evaluation Report
iv Interactive Highway Safety Design Model
Report Overview
Report Generated: Apr 10, 2025 11:26 AM
Report Template: System: Multi-Page [System] (sscpm2, Jul 23, 2021 4:16 PM) Evaluation Date: Tue Mar 25 11:41:19 PDT 2025
IHSDM Version: v17.0.0 (Sep 22, 2021)
Site Set Crash Prediction Module: v|ModuleInfo.moduleVersion| (|ModuleInfo.moduleDate|) User Name: Jeremy La Porte
Organization Name: Kimley-Horn
Phone: +1916-859-3611
E-Mail: [email protected]
Project Title: Apple Valley_Yucca Loma at Rincon
Project Comment: Created Mon Mar 24 14:58:14 PDT 2025
Project Unit System: U.S. Customary
Site Set: SSSC
Site Set Comment: Created Tue Mar 25 11:07:36 PDT 2025
Site Set Version: v1
Evaluation Title: SSSC_2025
Evaluation Comment: Created Tue Mar 25 11:41:01 PDT 2025 Policy for Superelevation: AASHTO 2011 U.S. Customary
Calibration: HSM Configuration
Crash Distribution: HSM Configuration
Model/CMF: HSM Configuration
First Year of Analysis: 2025
Last Year of Analysis: 2025
Empirical-Bayes Analysis: None
Disclaimer Regarding Crash Prediction Method
IMPORTANT NOTICE ABOUT COMPARING RESULTS FROM HIGHWAY SAFETY MANUAL FIRST EDITION (2010) MODELS TO RESULTS FROM NEW MODELS DEVELOPED UNDER NCHRP PROJECTS 17-70, 17-58, AND 17-68
Since the publication of the Highway Safety Manual - First Edition (HSM-1), in 2010 by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), multiple research efforts have been undertaken through the National Crash Prediction Evaluation Report Report Overview
Interactive Highway Safety Design Model 1
Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) to develop safety performance models for road segment and intersection facility types that were not initially reflected in the HSM-1, in order to expand the breadth and depth of the HSM in the future.
The IHSDM Crash Prediction Module (CPM) is intended as a faithful implementation of HSM Part C predictive methods. As NCHRP projects to develop new predictive methods for the HSM are completed, FHWA works to incorporate the new methods into IHSDM, sometimes in advance of publication in the HSM. The following new crash predictive methods have been accepted by NCHRP project panels and incorporated into IHSDM, while pending AASHTO's approval for incorporation into a future edition of the HSM:
- Roundabouts: completed in 2018 under NCHRP Project 17-70, the new methods will provide improved outcomes for the safety analysis of roundabouts.
- 6+ lane and one-way urban/suburban arterials (including models for segments and intersections): completed under NCHRP Project 17-58.
- Intersection crash prediction methods for some intersection configurations and traffic control types not currently addressed in the HSM (e.g., all-way stop; rural 3-leg signalized; 3-leg stop-controlled where the major leg turns; urban 5-leg signalized; urban high-speed intersections): completed in 2021 under NCHRP Project 17-68.
However, in the absence of local calibration factors (see HSM-1 Part C, Appendix A for guidance on calibration of the predictive models), it is neither appropriate nor advisable to directly compare the results from new models (from NCHRP Projects 17-58, 17-68, and 17-70) to results from HSM-1 models, as the models were not calibrated to the same base state data sets, and consequently can produce unexpected results. If local calibration factors are available and applied to both new models and HSM1 models, then it may be appropriate to directly compare the results.[Note: Work being performed under NCHRP Project 17-72 (Update of Crash Modification Factors for the Highway Safety Manual) is expected to re-calibrate many of the old (HSM-1) and new (e.g., NCHRP 17-70) models to data from a single (or small number of) states, that would allow results from all models to be directly compared.]
The models produced for NCHRP Project 17-70 have independent value in terms of informing the design of a roundabout and assessing the effects of different design characteristics on the expected safety performance of a roundabout.
The HSM-1 interim method previously included in IHSDM for evaluating roundabouts on urban/suburban arterials (i.e., evaluating an existing intersection and then applying a Crash Modification Factor for replacing the existing intersection with a roundabout) has been deactivated in IHSDM, to minimize any confusion with the new roundabout methodology.
Report Overview Crash Prediction Evaluation Report
2 Interactive Highway Safety Design Model
Section Types
Urban Arterial Site Set CPM Evaluation
Site Type
Type: 4ST
Calibration Factor: 1
Table 1. Evaluation and Crash Data (CSD) (if applicable) Intersection Sites Site
No. Type Highway Site Description Major AADT MinorAADT
Number of
Approaches
with LeftTurn Lanes
Number of
Approaches
with RightTurn Lanes
Presence of
Lighting
1 4ST2x2le5 Yucca Loma road Rincon Road 2025: 12150 2025: 4690 2 0 yes Table 2. Predicted Crash Frequencies and Rates by Site
Site
No.
Typ
e
Highway Site
Description
Total
Predicted
Crashes for
Evaluation
Period
Predicted
Total
Crash
Frequency
(crashes/yr
)
Predicted
FI Crash
Frequency
(crashes/yr
)
Predicted
PDO
Crash
Frequency
(crashes/yr
)
Predicted
Intersection
Travel Crash
Rate
(crashes/millio
n veh)
Intersection
Crash Rate
(crashes/yr)
1 4ST Yucca Loma road Rincon Road 1.419 1.4195 0.5666 0.8528 0.23 1.4195 Total Total 1.419 1.4195 0.5666 0.8528 0.23 1.4195
Table 3. Predicted Crash Frequencies by Year (4ST)
Year Total Crashes FI Crashes Percent FI (%) PDO Crashes Percent PDO (%)
2025 1.42 0.57 39.920 0.85 60.080
Total 1.42 0.57 39.920 0.85 60.080
Average 1.42 0.57 39.920 0.85 60.080
Note: Fatal and Injury Crashes and Property Damage Only Crashes do not necessarily sum up to Total Crashes because the Crash Prediction Evaluation Report Section Types
Interactive Highway Safety Design Model 3
distribution of these three crashes had been derived independently.
Table 4. Predicted 4ST Crash Type Distribution
Element Type Crash Type
Fatal and Injury Property Damage
Only Total
Crashes Crashes
(%) Crashes Crashes(%) Crashes Crashes(%)
Intersection Collision with Animal 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.2 0.00 0.2 Intersection Collision with Bicycle 0.03 1.7 0.00 0.0 0.03 1.7 Intersection Collision with Fixed Object 0.03 1.9 0.09 6.2 0.12 8.1 Intersection Non-Collision 0.01 0.5 0.01 0.4 0.01 0.9
Intersection Collision with Other Object 0.00 0.3 0.01 0.5 0.01 0.8 Intersection Other Single-vehicle Collision 0.00 0.1 0.00 0.1 0.00 0.2 Intersection Collision with Parked Vehicle 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 Intersection Collision with Pedestrian 0.03 2.1 0.00 0.0 0.03 2.1 Intersection Total Intersection Single Vehicle Crashes 0.10 6.7 0.10 7.3 0.20 14.0 Intersection Angle Collision 0.21 14.6 0.25 17.7 0.46 32.3 Intersection Head-on Collision 0.02 1.4 0.02 1.6 0.04 2.9 Intersection Other Multi-vehicle Collision 0.03 2.0 0.16 11.5 0.19 13.4 Intersection Rear-end Collision 0.16 11.2 0.28 19.7 0.44 31.0 Intersection Sideswipe 0.06 4.0 0.03 2.3 0.09 6.3
Intersection Total Intersection Multiple Vehicle Crashes 0.47 33.2 0.75 52.8 1.22 86.0 Intersection Total Intersection Crashes 0.57 39.9 0.85 60.1 1.42 100.0 Total Crashes 0.57 39.9 0.85 60.1 1.42 100.0
Note: Fatal and Injury Crashes and Property Damage Only Crashes do not necessarily sum up to Total Crashes because the distribution of these three crashes had been derived independently.
Section Types Crash Prediction Evaluation Report
4 Interactive Highway Safety Design Model
Interactive Highway Safety Design Model
Crash Prediction Evaluation Report
April 10, 2025
Disclaimer
The Interactive Highway Design Model (IHSDM) software is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its content or use thereof. This document does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.
The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade and manufacturers' names may appear in this software and documentation only because they are considered essential to the objective of the software.
Limited Warranty and Limitations of Remedies
This software product is provided "as-is," without warranty of any kind-either expressed or implied (but not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose). The FHWA do not warrant that the functions contained in the software will meet the end-user's requirements or that the operation of the software will be uninterrupted and error-free.
Under no circumstances will the FHWA be liable to the end-user for any damages or claimed lost profits, lost savings, or other incidental or consequential damages rising out of the use or inability to use the software (even if these organizations have been advised of the possibility of such damages), or for any claim by any other party.
Notice
The use of the IHSDM software is being done strictly on a voluntary basis. In exchange for provision of IHSDM, the user agrees that the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), U.S. Department of Transportation and any other agency of the Federal Government shall not be responsible for any errors, damage or other liability that may result from any and all use of the software, including installation and testing of the software. The user further agrees to hold the FHWA and the Federal Government harmless from any resulting liability. The user agrees that this hold harmless provision shall flow to any person to whom or any entity to which the user provides the IHSDM software. It is the user's full responsibility to inform any person to whom or any entity to which it provides the IHSDM software of this hold harmless provision.
Table of Contents
Report Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Disclaimer Regarding Crash Prediction Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Section Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Urban Arterial Site Set CPM Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 List of Tables
Table Evaluation and Crash Data (CSD) (if applicable) Intersection Sites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Table Predicted Crash Frequencies and Rates by Site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Table Predicted Crash Frequencies by Year (4SG) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Table Predicted 4SG Crash Type Distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 List of Tables Crash Prediction Evaluation Report
iv Interactive Highway Safety Design Model
Report Overview
Report Generated: Apr 10, 2025 11:29 AM
Report Template: System: Multi-Page [System] (sscpm2, Jul 23, 2021 4:16 PM) Evaluation Date: Tue Mar 25 11:47:49 PDT 2025
IHSDM Version: v17.0.0 (Sep 22, 2021)
Site Set Crash Prediction Module: v|ModuleInfo.moduleVersion| (|ModuleInfo.moduleDate|) User Name: Jeremy La Porte
Organization Name: Kimley-Horn
Phone: +1916-859-3611
E-Mail: [email protected]
Project Title: Apple Valley_Yucca Loma at Rincon
Project Comment: Created Mon Mar 24 14:58:14 PDT 2025
Project Unit System: U.S. Customary
Site Set: Signal
Site Set Comment: Created Tue Mar 25 11:22:47 PDT 2025
Site Set Version: v1
Evaluation Title: Signal_2025
Evaluation Comment: Created Tue Mar 25 11:47:26 PDT 2025 Policy for Superelevation: AASHTO 2011 U.S. Customary
Calibration: HSM Configuration
Crash Distribution: HSM Configuration
Model/CMF: HSM Configuration
First Year of Analysis: 2025
Last Year of Analysis: 2025
Empirical-Bayes Analysis: None
Disclaimer Regarding Crash Prediction Method
IMPORTANT NOTICE ABOUT COMPARING RESULTS FROM HIGHWAY SAFETY MANUAL FIRST EDITION (2010) MODELS TO RESULTS FROM NEW MODELS DEVELOPED UNDER NCHRP PROJECTS 17-70, 17-58, AND 17-68
Since the publication of the Highway Safety Manual - First Edition (HSM-1), in 2010 by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), multiple research efforts have been undertaken through the National Crash Prediction Evaluation Report Report Overview
Interactive Highway Safety Design Model 1
Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) to develop safety performance models for road segment and intersection facility types that were not initially reflected in the HSM-1, in order to expand the breadth and depth of the HSM in the future.
The IHSDM Crash Prediction Module (CPM) is intended as a faithful implementation of HSM Part C predictive methods. As NCHRP projects to develop new predictive methods for the HSM are completed, FHWA works to incorporate the new methods into IHSDM, sometimes in advance of publication in the HSM. The following new crash predictive methods have been accepted by NCHRP project panels and incorporated into IHSDM, while pending AASHTO's approval for incorporation into a future edition of the HSM:
- Roundabouts: completed in 2018 under NCHRP Project 17-70, the new methods will provide improved outcomes for the safety analysis of roundabouts.
- 6+ lane and one-way urban/suburban arterials (including models for segments and intersections): completed under NCHRP Project 17-58.
- Intersection crash prediction methods for some intersection configurations and traffic control types not currently addressed in the HSM (e.g., all-way stop; rural 3-leg signalized; 3-leg stop-controlled where the major leg turns; urban 5-leg signalized; urban high-speed intersections): completed in 2021 under NCHRP Project 17-68.
However, in the absence of local calibration factors (see HSM-1 Part C, Appendix A for guidance on calibration of the predictive models), it is neither appropriate nor advisable to directly compare the results from new models (from NCHRP Projects 17-58, 17-68, and 17-70) to results from HSM-1 models, as the models were not calibrated to the same base state data sets, and consequently can produce unexpected results. If local calibration factors are available and applied to both new models and HSM1 models, then it may be appropriate to directly compare the results.[Note: Work being performed under NCHRP Project 17-72 (Update of Crash Modification Factors for the Highway Safety Manual) is expected to re-calibrate many of the old (HSM-1) and new (e.g., NCHRP 17-70) models to data from a single (or small number of) states, that would allow results from all models to be directly compared.]
The models produced for NCHRP Project 17-70 have independent value in terms of informing the design of a roundabout and assessing the effects of different design characteristics on the expected safety performance of a roundabout.
The HSM-1 interim method previously included in IHSDM for evaluating roundabouts on urban/suburban arterials (i.e., evaluating an existing intersection and then applying a Crash Modification Factor for replacing the existing intersection with a roundabout) has been deactivated in IHSDM, to minimize any confusion with the new roundabout methodology.
Report Overview Crash Prediction Evaluation Report
2 Interactive Highway Safety Design Model
Section Types
Urban Arterial Site Set CPM Evaluation
Site Type
Type: 4SG
Calibration Factor: 1
Crash Prediction Evaluation Report Section Types
Interactive Highway Safety Design Model 3
Table 1. Evaluation and Crash Data (CSD) (if applicable) Intersection Sites Site
No. Type Highway Site Description Major AADT Minor AADT Number of
Approaches
with LeftTurn Lanes
Number of
Approaches
with RightTurn Lanes
Presence
of
Lighting
Number of
Approaches
with
Permissive
Left-Turn
Phasing
Number of
Approaches
with
Permissive/Pr
otected or
Protected/Per
missive LeftTurn Phasing
Number of
Approaches
with
Protected
Left-Turn
Phasing
Number of
Approaches
on which
Right Turn
on Red is
Prohibited
Presence
of RedLight
Cameras
Pedestrian
Volumes
Crossing all
Intersection
Legs
(crossings/day)
Max. Number
of Lanes
Crossed by
Pedestrians
Number of Bus
Stops within
1000 ft of
Intersection
Number of
Schools within
1000 ft of
Intersection
Number of Alcohol
Sales
Establishments
within 1000 ft of
Intersection
1 4SG2x2le5 Yucca Loma Road Rincon Road 2025: 12150 2025: 4690 2 0 yes 0 0 2 0 no 50 3 0 0 0 Table 2. Predicted Crash Frequencies and Rates by Site
Site
No. Type Highway Site Description
Total Predicted
Crashes for
Evaluation Period
Predicted Total
Crash
Frequency
(crashes/yr)
Predicted FI
Crash
Frequency
(crashes/yr)
Predicted PDO
Crash
Frequency
(crashes/yr)
Predicted Intersection
Travel Crash Rate
(crashes/million veh)
Intersection Crash
Rate (crashes/yr)
1 4SG Yucca Loma Road Rincon Road 1.992 1.9916 0.6544 1.3373 0.32 1.9916 Total Total 1.992 1.9916 0.6544 1.3373 0.32 1.9916
Table 3. Predicted Crash Frequencies by Year (4SG)
Year Total Crashes FI Crashes Percent FI (%) PDO Crashes Percent PDO (%) 2025 1.99 0.65 32.855 1.34 67.144Total 1.99 0.65 32.855 1.34 67.144Average 1.99 0.65 32.855 1.34 67.144 Note: Fatal and Injury Crashes and Property Damage Only Crashes do not necessarily sum up to Total Crashes because the distribution of these three crashes had been derived Section Types Crash Prediction Evaluation Report4 Interactive Highway Safety Design Model
independently.
Table 4. Predicted 4SG Crash Type Distribution
Element Type Crash Type
Fatal and Injury Property Damage
Only Total
Crashes Crashes
(%) Crashes Crashes(%) Crashes Crashes(%)
Intersection Collision with Animal 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 Intersection Collision with Bicycle 0.03 1.5 0.00 0.0 0.03 1.5 Intersection Collision with Fixed Object 0.03 1.6 0.09 4.3 0.12 5.9 Intersection Non-Collision 0.01 0.3 0.00 0.2 0.01 0.5
Intersection Collision with Other Object 0.00 0.2 0.01 0.3 0.01 0.5 Intersection Other Single-vehicle Collision 0.00 0.1 0.00 0.1 0.00 0.2 Intersection Collision with Parked Vehicle 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 Intersection Collision with Pedestrian 0.02 0.9 0.00 0.0 0.02 0.9 Intersection Total Intersection Single Vehicle Crashes 0.09 4.5 0.10 5.0 0.19 9.5 Intersection Angle Collision 0.20 9.8 0.30 15.2 0.50 25.0 Intersection Head-on Collision 0.03 1.4 0.04 1.9 0.07 3.3 Intersection Other Multi-vehicle Collision 0.03 1.6 0.26 13.1 0.29 14.7 Intersection Rear-end Collision 0.25 12.8 0.60 30.0 0.85 42.8 Intersection Sideswipe 0.06 2.8 0.04 2.0 0.10 4.8
Intersection Total Intersection Multiple Vehicle Crashes 0.56 28.4 1.24 62.2 1.80 90.5 Intersection Total Intersection Crashes 0.65 32.9 1.34 67.1 1.99 100.0 Total Crashes 0.65 32.9 1.34 67.1 1.99 100.0
Note: Fatal and Injury Crashes and Property Damage Only Crashes do not necessarily sum up to Total Crashes because the distribution of these three crashes had been derived independently.
Crash Prediction Evaluation Report Section Types
Interactive Highway Safety Design Model 5
Interactive Highway Safety Design Model
Crash Prediction Evaluation Report
April 10, 2025
Disclaimer
The Interactive Highway Design Model (IHSDM) software is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its content or use thereof. This document does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.
The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade and manufacturers' names may appear in this software and documentation only because they are considered essential to the objective of the software.
Limited Warranty and Limitations of Remedies
This software product is provided "as-is," without warranty of any kind-either expressed or implied (but not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose). The FHWA do not warrant that the functions contained in the software will meet the end-user's requirements or that the operation of the software will be uninterrupted and error-free.
Under no circumstances will the FHWA be liable to the end-user for any damages or claimed lost profits, lost savings, or other incidental or consequential damages rising out of the use or inability to use the software (even if these organizations have been advised of the possibility of such damages), or for any claim by any other party.
Notice
The use of the IHSDM software is being done strictly on a voluntary basis. In exchange for provision of IHSDM, the user agrees that the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), U.S. Department of Transportation and any other agency of the Federal Government shall not be responsible for any errors, damage or other liability that may result from any and all use of the software, including installation and testing of the software. The user further agrees to hold the FHWA and the Federal Government harmless from any resulting liability. The user agrees that this hold harmless provision shall flow to any person to whom or any entity to which the user provides the IHSDM software. It is the user's full responsibility to inform any person to whom or any entity to which it provides the IHSDM software of this hold harmless provision.
Table of Contents
Report Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Disclaimer Regarding Crash Prediction Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Section Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Urban Arterial Site Set CPM Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 List of Tables
Table Evaluation and Crash Data (CSD) (if applicable) Intersection Sites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Table Predicted Crash Frequencies and Rates by Site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Table Predicted Crash Frequencies by Year (4ST) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Table Predicted 4ST Crash Type Distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Table Evaluation Message . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 List of Tables Crash Prediction Evaluation Report
iv Interactive Highway Safety Design Model
Report Overview
Report Generated: Apr 10, 2025 11:27 AM
Report Template: System: Multi-Page, 508 Compliant [System] (sscpm4, Jul 23, 2021 4:16 PM) Evaluation Date: Thu Apr 03 09:16:13 PDT 2025
IHSDM Version: v17.0.0 (Sep 22, 2021)
Site Set Crash Prediction Module: v|ModuleInfo.moduleVersion| (|ModuleInfo.moduleDate|) User Name: Jeremy La Porte
Organization Name: Kimley-Horn
Phone: +1916-859-3611
E-Mail: [email protected]
Project Title: Apple Valley_Yucca Loma at Rincon
Project Comment: Created Mon Mar 24 14:58:14 PDT 2025
Project Unit System: U.S. Customary
Site Set: SSSC
Site Set Comment: Created Tue Mar 25 11:07:36 PDT 2025
Site Set Version: v1
Evaluation Title: SSSC_2045
Evaluation Comment: Created Thu Apr 03 09:15:54 PDT 2025 Policy for Superelevation: AASHTO 2011 U.S. Customary
Calibration: HSM Configuration
Crash Distribution: HSM Configuration
Model/CMF: HSM Configuration
First Year of Analysis: 2045
Last Year of Analysis: 2045
Empirical-Bayes Analysis: None
Disclaimer Regarding Crash Prediction Method
IMPORTANT NOTICE ABOUT COMPARING RESULTS FROM HIGHWAY SAFETY MANUAL FIRST EDITION (2010) MODELS TO RESULTS FROM NEW MODELS DEVELOPED UNDER NCHRP PROJECTS 17-70, 17-58, AND 17-68
Since the publication of the Highway Safety Manual - First Edition (HSM-1), in 2010 by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), multiple research efforts have been undertaken through the National Crash Prediction Evaluation Report Report Overview
Interactive Highway Safety Design Model 1
Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) to develop safety performance models for road segment and intersection facility types that were not initially reflected in the HSM-1, in order to expand the breadth and depth of the HSM in the future.
The IHSDM Crash Prediction Module (CPM) is intended as a faithful implementation of HSM Part C predictive methods. As NCHRP projects to develop new predictive methods for the HSM are completed, FHWA works to incorporate the new methods into IHSDM, sometimes in advance of publication in the HSM. The following new crash predictive methods have been accepted by NCHRP project panels and incorporated into IHSDM, while pending AASHTO's approval for incorporation into a future edition of the HSM:
- Roundabouts: completed in 2018 under NCHRP Project 17-70, the new methods will provide improved outcomes for the safety analysis of roundabouts.
- 6+ lane and one-way urban/suburban arterials (including models for segments and intersections): completed under NCHRP Project 17-58.
- Intersection crash prediction methods for some intersection configurations and traffic control types not currently addressed in the HSM (e.g., all-way stop; rural 3-leg signalized; 3-leg stop-controlled where the major leg turns; urban 5-leg signalized; urban high-speed intersections): completed in 2021 under NCHRP Project 17-68.
However, in the absence of local calibration factors (see HSM-1 Part C, Appendix A for guidance on calibration of the predictive models), it is neither appropriate nor advisable to directly compare the results from new models (from NCHRP Projects 17-58, 17-68, and 17-70) to results from HSM-1 models, as the models were not calibrated to the same base state data sets, and consequently can produce unexpected results. If local calibration factors are available and applied to both new models and HSM1 models, then it may be appropriate to directly compare the results.[Note: Work being performed under NCHRP Project 17-72 (Update of Crash Modification Factors for the Highway Safety Manual) is expected to re-calibrate many of the old (HSM-1) and new (e.g., NCHRP 17-70) models to data from a single (or small number of) states, that would allow results from all models to be directly compared.]
The models produced for NCHRP Project 17-70 have independent value in terms of informing the design of a roundabout and assessing the effects of different design characteristics on the expected safety performance of a roundabout.
The HSM-1 interim method previously included in IHSDM for evaluating roundabouts on urban/suburban arterials (i.e., evaluating an existing intersection and then applying a Crash Modification Factor for replacing the existing intersection with a roundabout) has been deactivated in IHSDM, to minimize any confusion with the new roundabout methodology.
Report Overview Crash Prediction Evaluation Report
2 Interactive Highway Safety Design Model
Section Types
Urban Arterial Site Set CPM Evaluation
Site Type
Type: 4ST
Calibration Factor: 1
Table 1. Evaluation and Crash Data (CSD) (if applicable) Intersection Sites Site
No. Type Highway Site Description Major AADT MinorAADT
Number of
Approaches
with LeftTurn Lanes
Number of
Approaches
with RightTurn Lanes
Presence of
Lighting
1 4ST2x2le5 Yucca Loma road Rincon Road 2045: 17618 2045: 6801 2 0 yes Table 2. Predicted Crash Frequencies and Rates by Site
Site
No.
Typ
e
Highway Site
Description
Total
Predicted
Crashes for
Evaluation
Period
Predicted
Total
Crash
Frequency
(crashes/yr
)
Predicted
FI Crash
Frequency
(crashes/yr
)
Predicted
PDO
Crash
Frequency
(crashes/yr
)
Predicted
Intersection
Travel Crash
Rate
(crashes/millio
n veh)
Intersection
Crash Rate
(crashes/yr)
1 4ST Yucca Loma road Rincon Road 2.067 2.0667 0.8611 1.2056 0.23 2.0667 Total Total 2.067 2.0667 0.8611 1.2056 0.23 2.0667
Table 3. Predicted Crash Frequencies by Year (4ST)
Year Total Crashes FI Crashes Percent FI (%) PDO Crashes Percent PDO (%)
2045 2.07 0.86 41.666 1.21 58.334
Total 2.07 0.86 41.666 1.21 58.334
Average 2.07 0.86 41.666 1.21 58.334
Note: Fatal and Injury Crashes and Property Damage Only Crashes do not necessarily sum up to Total Crashes because the Crash Prediction Evaluation Report Section Types
Interactive Highway Safety Design Model 3
distribution of these three crashes had been derived independently.
Table 4. Predicted 4ST Crash Type Distribution
Element Type Crash Type FI
Crashes
Percent
FI (%)
PDO
Crashes
Percent
PDO (%)
Total
Crashes
Percent
Total
(%)
Intersection Collision with Animal 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.2 0.00 0.2 Intersection Collision with Bicycle 0.04 1.7 0.00 0.0 0.04 1.7 Intersection Collision with Fixed Object 0.03 1.5 0.11 5.1 0.14 6.6 Intersection Non-Collision 0.01 0.4 0.01 0.3 0.01 0.7
Intersection Collision with Other Object 0.00 0.2 0.01 0.4 0.01 0.6 Intersection Other Single-vehicle Collision 0.00 0.1 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.2 Intersection Collision with Parked Vehicle 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 Intersection Collision with Pedestrian 0.04 2.1 0.00 0.0 0.04 2.1 Intersection Total Intersection Single Vehicle Crashes 0.12 6.1 0.12 6.0 0.25 12.1 Intersection Angle Collision 0.32 15.7 0.36 17.5 0.69 33.2 Intersection Head-on Collision 0.03 1.5 0.03 1.6 0.06 3.0 Intersection Other Multi-vehicle Collision 0.04 2.1 0.23 11.4 0.28 13.5 Intersection Rear-end Collision 0.25 12.0 0.40 19.6 0.65 31.6 Intersection Sideswipe 0.09 4.3 0.05 2.3 0.14 6.6
Intersection Total Intersection Multiple Vehicle Crashes 0.74 35.6 1.08 52.3 1.82 87.9 Intersection Total Intersection Crashes 0.86 41.7 1.21 58.3 2.07 100.0 Total Crashes 0.86 41.7 1.21 58.3 2.07 100.0
Note: Fatal and Injury Crashes and Property Damage Only Crashes do not necessarily sum up to Total Crashes because the distribution of these three crashes had been derived independently.
Section Types Crash Prediction Evaluation Report
4 Interactive Highway Safety Design Model
Table 5. Evaluation Message
Message
Warning: SiteUSA_4ST :Site number 1 - The value for the minor road traffic volume (6801.0) for year 2045 is not within the model limit (5900) for reliable results.
Crash Prediction Evaluation Report Section TypesInteractive Highway Safety Design Model 5
Interactive Highway Safety Design Model
Crash Prediction Evaluation Report
April 10, 2025
Disclaimer
The Interactive Highway Design Model (IHSDM) software is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its content or use thereof. This document does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.
The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade and manufacturers' names may appear in this software and documentation only because they are considered essential to the objective of the software.
Limited Warranty and Limitations of Remedies
This software product is provided "as-is," without warranty of any kind-either expressed or implied (but not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose). The FHWA do not warrant that the functions contained in the software will meet the end-user's requirements or that the operation of the software will be uninterrupted and error-free.
Under no circumstances will the FHWA be liable to the end-user for any damages or claimed lost profits, lost savings, or other incidental or consequential damages rising out of the use or inability to use the software (even if these organizations have been advised of the possibility of such damages), or for any claim by any other party.
Notice
The use of the IHSDM software is being done strictly on a voluntary basis. In exchange for provision of IHSDM, the user agrees that the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), U.S. Department of Transportation and any other agency of the Federal Government shall not be responsible for any errors, damage or other liability that may result from any and all use of the software, including installation and testing of the software. The user further agrees to hold the FHWA and the Federal Government harmless from any resulting liability. The user agrees that this hold harmless provision shall flow to any person to whom or any entity to which the user provides the IHSDM software. It is the user's full responsibility to inform any person to whom or any entity to which it provides the IHSDM software of this hold harmless provision.
Table of Contents
Report Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Disclaimer Regarding Crash Prediction Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Section Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Urban Arterial Site Set CPM Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 List of Tables
Table Evaluation and Crash Data (CSD) (if applicable) Intersection Sites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Table Predicted Crash Frequencies and Rates by Site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Table Predicted Crash Frequencies by Year (4SG) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Table Predicted 4SG Crash Type Distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 List of Tables Crash Prediction Evaluation Report
iv Interactive Highway Safety Design Model
Report Overview
Report Generated: Apr 10, 2025 11:29 AM
Report Template: System: Multi-Page [System] (sscpm2, Jul 23, 2021 4:16 PM) Evaluation Date: Thu Apr 03 09:16:37 PDT 2025
IHSDM Version: v17.0.0 (Sep 22, 2021)
Site Set Crash Prediction Module: v|ModuleInfo.moduleVersion| (|ModuleInfo.moduleDate|) User Name: Jeremy La Porte
Organization Name: Kimley-Horn
Phone: +1916-859-3611
E-Mail: [email protected]
Project Title: Apple Valley_Yucca Loma at Rincon
Project Comment: Created Mon Mar 24 14:58:14 PDT 2025
Project Unit System: U.S. Customary
Site Set: Signal
Site Set Comment: Created Tue Mar 25 11:22:47 PDT 2025
Site Set Version: v1
Evaluation Title: Signal_2045
Evaluation Comment: Created Thu Apr 03 09:16:21 PDT 2025 Policy for Superelevation: AASHTO 2011 U.S. Customary
Calibration: HSM Configuration
Crash Distribution: HSM Configuration
Model/CMF: HSM Configuration
First Year of Analysis: 2045
Last Year of Analysis: 2045
Empirical-Bayes Analysis: None
Disclaimer Regarding Crash Prediction Method
IMPORTANT NOTICE ABOUT COMPARING RESULTS FROM HIGHWAY SAFETY MANUAL FIRST EDITION (2010) MODELS TO RESULTS FROM NEW MODELS DEVELOPED UNDER NCHRP PROJECTS 17-70, 17-58, AND 17-68
Since the publication of the Highway Safety Manual - First Edition (HSM-1), in 2010 by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), multiple research efforts have been undertaken through the National Crash Prediction Evaluation Report Report Overview
Interactive Highway Safety Design Model 1
Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) to develop safety performance models for road segment and intersection facility types that were not initially reflected in the HSM-1, in order to expand the breadth and depth of the HSM in the future.
The IHSDM Crash Prediction Module (CPM) is intended as a faithful implementation of HSM Part C predictive methods. As NCHRP projects to develop new predictive methods for the HSM are completed, FHWA works to incorporate the new methods into IHSDM, sometimes in advance of publication in the HSM. The following new crash predictive methods have been accepted by NCHRP project panels and incorporated into IHSDM, while pending AASHTO's approval for incorporation into a future edition of the HSM:
- Roundabouts: completed in 2018 under NCHRP Project 17-70, the new methods will provide improved outcomes for the safety analysis of roundabouts.
- 6+ lane and one-way urban/suburban arterials (including models for segments and intersections): completed under NCHRP Project 17-58.
- Intersection crash prediction methods for some intersection configurations and traffic control types not currently addressed in the HSM (e.g., all-way stop; rural 3-leg signalized; 3-leg stop-controlled where the major leg turns; urban 5-leg signalized; urban high-speed intersections): completed in 2021 under NCHRP Project 17-68.
However, in the absence of local calibration factors (see HSM-1 Part C, Appendix A for guidance on calibration of the predictive models), it is neither appropriate nor advisable to directly compare the results from new models (from NCHRP Projects 17-58, 17-68, and 17-70) to results from HSM-1 models, as the models were not calibrated to the same base state data sets, and consequently can produce unexpected results. If local calibration factors are available and applied to both new models and HSM1 models, then it may be appropriate to directly compare the results.[Note: Work being performed under NCHRP Project 17-72 (Update of Crash Modification Factors for the Highway Safety Manual) is expected to re-calibrate many of the old (HSM-1) and new (e.g., NCHRP 17-70) models to data from a single (or small number of) states, that would allow results from all models to be directly compared.]
The models produced for NCHRP Project 17-70 have independent value in terms of informing the design of a roundabout and assessing the effects of different design characteristics on the expected safety performance of a roundabout.
The HSM-1 interim method previously included in IHSDM for evaluating roundabouts on urban/suburban arterials (i.e., evaluating an existing intersection and then applying a Crash Modification Factor for replacing the existing intersection with a roundabout) has been deactivated in IHSDM, to minimize any confusion with the new roundabout methodology.
Report Overview Crash Prediction Evaluation Report
2 Interactive Highway Safety Design Model
Section Types
Urban Arterial Site Set CPM Evaluation
Site Type
Type: 4SG
Calibration Factor: 1
Crash Prediction Evaluation Report Section Types
Interactive Highway Safety Design Model 3
Table 1. Evaluation and Crash Data (CSD) (if applicable) Intersection Sites Site
No. Type Highway Site Description Major AADT Minor AADT Number of
Approaches
with LeftTurn Lanes
Number of
Approaches
with RightTurn Lanes
Presence
of
Lighting
Number of
Approaches
with
Permissive
Left-Turn
Phasing
Number of
Approaches
with
Permissive/Pr
otected or
Protected/Per
missive LeftTurn Phasing
Number of
Approaches
with
Protected
Left-Turn
Phasing
Number of
Approaches
on which
Right Turn
on Red is
Prohibited
Presence
of RedLight
Cameras
Pedestrian
Volumes
Crossing all
Intersection
Legs
(crossings/day)
Max. Number
of Lanes
Crossed by
Pedestrians
Number of Bus
Stops within
1000 ft of
Intersection
Number of
Schools within
1000 ft of
Intersection
Number of Alcohol
Sales
Establishments
within 1000 ft of
Intersection
1 4SG2x2le5 Yucca Loma Road Rincon Road 2045: 17618 2045: 6801 2 0 yes 0 0 2 0 no 50 3 0 0 0 Table 2. Predicted Crash Frequencies and Rates by Site
Site
No. Type Highway Site Description
Total Predicted
Crashes for
Evaluation Period
Predicted Total
Crash
Frequency
(crashes/yr)
Predicted FI
Crash
Frequency
(crashes/yr)
Predicted PDO
Crash
Frequency
(crashes/yr)
Predicted Intersection
Travel Crash Rate
(crashes/million veh)
Intersection Crash
Rate (crashes/yr)
1 4SG Yucca Loma Road Rincon Road 3.192 3.1918 1.0720 2.1198 0.36 3.1918 Total Total 3.192 3.1918 1.0720 2.1198 0.36 3.1918
Table 3. Predicted Crash Frequencies by Year (4SG)
Year Total Crashes FI Crashes Percent FI (%) PDO Crashes Percent PDO (%) 2045 3.19 1.07 33.586 2.12 66.414Total 3.19 1.07 33.586 2.12 66.414Average 3.19 1.07 33.586 2.12 66.414 Note: Fatal and Injury Crashes and Property Damage Only Crashes do not necessarily sum up to Total Crashes because the distribution of these three crashes had been derived Section Types Crash Prediction Evaluation Report4 Interactive Highway Safety Design Model
independently.
Table 4. Predicted 4SG Crash Type Distribution
Element Type Crash Type
Fatal and Injury Property Damage
Only Total
Crashes Crashes
(%) Crashes Crashes(%) Crashes Crashes(%)
Intersection Collision with Animal 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 Intersection Collision with Bicycle 0.05 1.5 0.00 0.0 0.05 1.5 Intersection Collision with Fixed Object 0.04 1.3 0.13 4.0 0.17 5.2 Intersection Non-Collision 0.01 0.2 0.01 0.2 0.01 0.4
Intersection Collision with Other Object 0.00 0.1 0.01 0.3 0.01 0.4 Intersection Other Single-vehicle Collision 0.00 0.1 0.00 0.1 0.01 0.2 Intersection Collision with Parked Vehicle 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 Intersection Collision with Pedestrian 0.02 0.7 0.00 0.0 0.02 0.7 Intersection Total Intersection Single Vehicle Crashes 0.12 3.8 0.15 4.6 0.27 8.4 Intersection Angle Collision 0.33 10.3 0.48 15.1 0.81 25.4 Intersection Head-on Collision 0.05 1.5 0.06 1.9 0.11 3.3 Intersection Other Multi-vehicle Collision 0.05 1.6 0.42 13.1 0.47 14.7 Intersection Rear-end Collision 0.43 13.4 0.95 29.9 1.38 43.3 Intersection Sideswipe 0.09 2.9 0.06 2.0 0.16 4.9
Intersection Total Intersection Multiple Vehicle Crashes 0.95 29.7 1.97 61.8 2.92 91.6 Intersection Total Intersection Crashes 1.07 33.6 2.12 66.4 3.19 100.0 Total Crashes 1.07 33.6 2.12 66.4 3.19 100.0
Note: Fatal and Injury Crashes and Property Damage Only Crashes do not necessarily sum up to Total Crashes because the distribution of these three crashes had been derived independently.
Crash Prediction Evaluation Report Section Types
Interactive Highway Safety Design Model 5
Town Council Agenda Report
Date: May 27, 2025
To: Honorable Mayor and Town Council
Subject: AWARD A GOODS AND SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE
OF THE VETERANS MONUMENT AT CAPTAIN JOSEPH
MCCONNELL JR. USAF PARK
From: Douglas Robertson, Town Manager
Submitted by: Debbie S. Rivera, Director of Parks & Recreation Parks and Recreation Department
Budgeted Item: Yes No N/A
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Award a Goods and Services Agreement to Monument Warehouse, LLC. for the Apple Valley Veterans Monument subject to “Approval as to Form” by the Town Attorney and “Approval as to Content” by the Town Manager.
BACKGROUND
As a component of the Captain Joseph McConnell, Jr., USAF Park project, the Town intends to dedicate a portion of the plaza area to a monument honoring Captain McConnell and all United States military veterans. During the park’s design phase, staff developed a concept for the monument which will be fabricated out of black granite. The concept was incorporated into a Request for Proposals (RFP) as the basis of design, and respondents were asked to provide a concept of the finished monument as well as background information of their firm and examples of previous projects. The project includes final design and engineering of the monument, fabrication, and delivery to the park. Upon receipt, the monument will be installed by the Three Peaks Corporation, the contractor currently constructing the park.
ANALYSIS
On March 26, 2025, staff advertised the RFP through its online portal, and on April 17, 2025, staff received four proposals. On May 12, 2025, the Park & Recreation Advisory Committee met to review the submitted proposals. Upon review of the proposals, the Committee selected Monument Warehouse, LLC. based on the quality of their proposal, experience with similar types of work, and their ability to capture the Town’s intent for the monument. Additionally, included in their proposal is onsite supervision of the installation of the monument.
FISCAL IMPACT
The total cost for this project is $187,240. We anticipate that this amount will be included and approved in the proposed budget for fiscal year 2025–2026, and will be funded through the General Fund.
ATTACHMENTS
A. Goods and Services Agreement
B. Conceptual Design prepared by Monument Warehouse, LLC
28314.00001/43446975.2
(BBK 2025)
- 1 -
TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY
GOODS & SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made and entered into this 27th day of May, 2025, by and between the Town of Apple Valley, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of California with its principal place of business at 14955 Dale Evans Parkway, Apple Valley, CA 92307 (“Town”) and Monument Warehouse, LLC., a Corporation, with its principal place of business at 1551 Mineral Springs Rd, Elberton GA 30635 (“Vendor”). Town and Vendor are sometimes individually referred to as “Party” and collectively as “Parties” in this Agreement.
RECITALS
A. Vendor desires to perform and assume responsibility for the provision of certain services and goods required by the Town on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.
Vendor represents that it is experienced in providing similar services and goods to public clients, that it and its employees or subcontractors have all necessary licenses and permits to perform the services in the State of California and that is familiar with and understands the needs of Town.
B. Town desires to engage Vendor to sell to Town the materials and/or equipment and/or render such services as more particularly described in this Agreement.
TERMS
1. SCOPE OF SERVICES.
1.1 General Scope of Services. Vendor promises and agrees to furnish to the Town all labor, materials, tools, equipment, services, and incidental and customary work necessary to fully and adequately supply the design and fabrication services (“Services”) which are more particularly described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. All Services shall be subject to, and performed in accordance with, this Agreement, the exhibits attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations.
1.2 Goods. Vendor agrees to sell to Town and Town agrees to purchase the materials and/or equipment (“Goods”) as specified and per the specifications attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit “A.” Unless specifically stated otherwise, the Goods shall be new and unused and of the current production year.
2. TERM.
2.1 The term of this Agreement shall be from May 27, 2025 to October 31, 2025, unless earlier terminated as provided herein. Vendor shall provide all Goods and complete the Services within the term of this Agreement, and shall meet any other established schedules and deadlines.
The Parties may, by mutual, written consent, extend the term of this Agreement if necessary to complete the work.
3. FEES AND PAYMENTS.
3.1 Compensation. Vendor shall receive compensation, including authorized reimbursements, for all Goods provided and Services rendered under this Agreement at the rates
28314.00001/43446975.2
(BBK 2025)
- 2 -
set forth in Exhibit “C” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The total compensation shall not exceed One Hundred Eighty-Seven Thousand Two Hundred Forty dollars ($187,240.00) without written approval of the Town Manager or his designee. Extra Work may be authorized, as described below, and if authorized, will be compensated at the rates and manner set forth in this Agreement.
3.2 Payment of Compensation. Vendor shall submit to Town a monthly itemized statement which indicates work completed and hours of Services rendered by Vendor and Goods provided. The statement shall describe the amount of Services and Goods provided since the initial commencement date, or since the start of the subsequent billing periods, as appropriate, through the date of the statement. Town shall, within 45 days of receiving such statement, review the statement and pay all non-disputed and approved charges thereon.
3.3 Reimbursement for Expenses. Vendor shall not be reimbursed for any expenses unless authorized in writing by Town.
3.4 Extra Work. At any time during the term of this Agreement, Town may request that Vendor perform Extra Work. As used herein, “Extra Work” means any work which is determined by Town to be necessary for the proper completion of the Goods and Services, but which the parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement.
Vendor shall not perform, nor be compensated for, Extra Work without written authorization from Town’s Representative.
4. RESPONSIBILITIES OF VENDOR.
4.1 Control and Payment of Subordinates; Independent Contractor. The Services shall be performed by Vendor or under its supervision. Vendor will determine the means, methods and details of performing the Services subject to the requirements of this Agreement. Town retains Vendor on an independent contractor basis and not as an employee. Vendor retains the right to perform similar or different services for others during the term of this Agreement. Any additional personnel performing the Services under this Agreement on behalf of Vendor shall also not be employees of Town and shall at all times be under Vendor’s exclusive direction and control.
Neither Town, or any of its officials, officers, directors, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of Vendor or any of Vendor’s officers, employees or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Vendor shall pay all wages, salaries, and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance of providing Goods and Services under this Agreement and as required by law. Vendor shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such additional personnel, including, but not limited to: social security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, disability insurance, and workers’ compensation insurance.
4.2 Schedule of Services.
4.2.1 Vendor shall perform the Services and provide Goods expeditiously, within the term of this Agreement, and in accordance with the Schedule of Goods and Services set forth in Exhibit “B” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (“Performance time”). Upon request of Town, Vendor shall provide a more detailed schedule of anticipated performance to meet the Schedule of Goods and Services. Vendor agrees that if the Goods are not provided and/or the Services are not completed within the Performance Time, it is understood, acknowledged and agreed that the Town will suffer damage.
28314.00001/43446975.2
(BBK 2025)
- 3 -
4.2.2 Neither Town nor Vendor shall be considered in default of this Agreement for delays in performance caused by circumstances beyond the reasonable control of the nonperforming Party. For purposes of this Agreement, such circumstances include a Force Majeure Event. A Force Majeure Event shall mean an event that materially affects a Party’s performance and is one or more of the following: (1) Acts of God or other natural disasters; (2) terrorism or other acts of a public enemy; (3) orders of governmental authorities (including, without limitation, unreasonable and unforeseeable delay in the issuance of permits or approvals by governmental authorities that are required for the services); (4) strikes and other organized labor action occurring at the site and the effects thereof on the services, only to the extent such strikes and other organized labor action are beyond the control of Vendor and its subcontractors, and to the extent the effects thereof cannot be avoided by use of replacement workers; and (5) pandemics, epidemics or quarantine restrictions. For purposes of this Section, “orders of governmental authorities,” includes ordinances, emergency proclamations and orders, rules to protect the public health, welfare and safety, and other actions of a public agency applicable to the Agreement.
4.2.3 Should a Force Majeure Event occur, the non-performing Party shall, within a reasonable time of being prevented from performing, give written notice to the other Party describing the circumstances preventing continued performance and the efforts being made to resume performance of this Agreement. Force Majeure Events and/or delays, regardless of the Party responsible for the delay, shall not entitle Vendor to any additional compensation.
Notwithstanding the foregoing in this section, the Town may still terminate this Agreement in accordance with the termination provisions of this Agreement.
4.3 Conformance to Applicable Requirements. All work prepared by Vendor shall be subject to the approval of Town.
4.4 Acceptance. The Goods shall be received subject to Town’s inspection and right of rejection. The Goods shall not be considered accepted until inspection, testing and/or use of the Goods is found to be in accordance with the Town’s specifications. Final inspection of the Goods shall be at the location specified herein, unless otherwise agreed in writing. If the Goods are found at any time to be defective in material or workmanship, or otherwise not in conformance with specifications, Town shall have the right, in addition to any other rights which it may have under warranties or otherwise, to reject such Goods in whole or in part. Rejected Goods shall be held at Vendor’s risk for a reasonable time thereafter and shall be returned or disposed of at Vendor’s expense. No rejected Goods shall be replaced by Vendor without written instruction or authorization from Town.
4.5 Coordination of Services. Vendor agrees to work closely with Town staff in the performance of Services and shall be available to Town’s staff, consultants and other staff at all reasonable times.
4.6 Standard of Care; Performance of Employees. Vendor shall perform all Services under this Agreement in a skillful and competent manner, consistent with the standards generally recognized as being employed by professionals in the same discipline in the State of California.
Vendor represents and maintains that it is skilled in the professional calling necessary to perform the Services. Vendor warrants that all employees and subcontractors shall have sufficient skill and experience to perform the Services assigned to them. Vendor represents that it, its employees and subcontractors have all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to perform the Services, including a Town business license, and that such licenses and approvals shall be maintained throughout the term of this Agreement. As provided for in the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, Vendor shall
28314.00001/43446975.2
(BBK 2025)
- 4 -
perform, at its own cost and expense and without reimbursement from the Town, any services necessary to correct errors or omissions which are caused by the Vendor’s failure to comply with the standard of care provided for herein. Any employee of the Vendor or its sub-Vendors who is determined by the Town to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Services, a threat to the safety of persons or property, or any employee who fails or refuses to perform the Services in a manner acceptable to the Town, shall be promptly removed by the Vendor and shall not be re-employed to perform any of the Services provided under this Agreement.
4.7 Warranty. In addition to all warranties which may be provided by law, Vendor warrants that the Goods delivered hereunder shall, (a) be free from defect of material or workmanship and conform strictly to the specifications, drawings, or sample specified or furnished; (b) conform to drawings, plans, specifications, samples or other descriptions furnished, specified, accepted or approved by Town; and (c) be merchantable and fit for the purposes intended. The warranty shall be for a period of one (1) year, or such longer period as provided by a manufacturer’s warranty or as agreed to by Vendor and Town, from the date of final written acceptance of the Goods by Town. This warranty shall survive any inspection, delivery, acceptance, or payment by Town of the Goods. Vendor, at its own expense, shall repair or replace, at the option of Town, any defective Goods within two (2) business days after receipt of notice from Town or within four (4) hours in case of emergency, as determined by Town. Vendor also warrants that the Goods are free and clear of all liens and encumbrances whatsoever, that Vendor is conveying good and marketable title to same, and that Vendor owns or has a valid license for all of the proprietary technology and intellectual property incorporated within the Goods. Vendor agrees to indemnify, defend and hold Town harmless against any and all third party claims resulting from the breach or inaccuracy of any of the foregoing warranties.
4.8 Reserved.
4.9 Disputes. Should any dispute arise respecting the true value of any work done, of any work omitted, or of any extra work which Vendor may be required to do, or respecting the size of any payment to Vendor during the performance of this Contract, Vendor shall continue to perform the Work while said dispute is decided by the Town. If Vendor disputes the Town’s decision, Vendor shall have such remedies as may be provided by law.
4.10 Laws and Regulations; Employee/Labor Certifications. Vendor shall keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations in any manner affecting its performance under this Agreement, including all Cal/OSHA requirements, and shall give all notices required by law. Vendor shall be liable for all violations of such laws and regulations in connection with this Agreement. If the Vendor performs any work knowing it to be contrary to such laws, rules and regulations and without giving written notice to the Town, Vendor shall be solely responsible for all costs arising therefrom. Town is a public entity of the State of California subject to certain provisions of the Health & Safety Code, Government Code, Public Contract Code, and Labor Code of the State. It is stipulated and agreed that all provisions of the law applicable to the public contracts of a municipality are a part of this Agreement to the same extent as though set forth herein and will be complied with. These include but are not limited to the payment of prevailing wages, the stipulation that eight (8) hours’ labor shall constitute a legal day’s work and that no worker shall be permitted to work in excess of eight (8) hours during any one calendar day except as permitted by law. Vendor shall defend, indemnify and hold Town, its officials, directors, officers, employees and agents free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with such laws, rules or regulations.
28314.00001/43446975.2
(BBK 2025)
- 5 -
4.10.1 Employment Eligibility; Vendor. By executing this Agreement, Vendor verifies that it fully complies with all requirements and restrictions of state and federal law respecting the employment of undocumented aliens, including, but not limited to, the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, as may be amended from time to time. Such requirements and restrictions include, but are not limited to, examination and retention of documentation confirming the identity and immigration status of each employee of the Vendor. Vendor also verifies that it has not committed a violation of any such law within the five (5) years immediately preceding the date of execution of this Agreement, and shall not violate any such law at any time during the term of the Agreement. Vendor shall avoid any violation of any such law during the term of this Agreement by participating in an electronic verification of work authorization program operated by the United States Department of Homeland Security, by participating in an equivalent federal work authorization program operated by the United States Department of Homeland Security to verify information of newly hired employees, or by some other legally acceptable method. Vendor shall maintain records of each such verification, and shall make them available to the Town or its representatives for inspection and copy at any time during normal business hours. The Town shall not be responsible for any costs or expenses related to Vendor’s compliance with the requirements provided for in Section 4.10 or any of its sub-sections.
4.10.2 Employment Eligibility; Subcontractors, and Consultants. To the same extent and under the same conditions as Vendor, Vendor shall require all of its subcontractors, and consultants performing any work relating to this Agreement to make the same verifications and comply with all requirements and restrictions provided for herein.
4.10.3 Employment Eligibility; Failure to Comply. Each person executing this Agreement on behalf of Vendor verifies that they are a duly authorized officer of Vendor, and understands that any of the following shall be grounds for the Town to terminate the Agreement for cause: (1) failure of Vendor or its subcontractors, or consultants to meet any of the requirements provided for in Sections 4.10.1 or 4.10.2; (2) any misrepresentation or material omission concerning compliance with such requirements (including in those verifications provided to the Vendor under Section 4.10.2); or (3) failure to immediately remove from this contract any person found not to be in compliance with such requirements.
4.10.4 Labor Certification. By its signature hereunder, Vendor certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Workers’ Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services.
4.10.5 Equal Opportunity Employment. Vendor represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. Vendor shall also comply with all relevant provisions of Town’s Minority Business Enterprise program, Affirmative Action Plan or other related programs or guidelines currently in effect or hereinafter enacted.
4.10.6 Air Quality. Vendor must fully comply with all applicable laws, rules and regulations in furnishing or using equipment and/or providing services, including, but not limited to, emissions limits and permitting requirements imposed by the California Air Resources Board (CARB). Vendor shall specifically be aware of the CARB limits and requirements’ application to
28314.00001/43446975.2
(BBK 2025)
- 6 -
“portable equipment”, which definition is considered by CARB to include any item of equipment with a fuel-powered engine. Vendor shall indemnify Town against any fines or penalties imposed by CARB or any other governmental or regulatory agency for violations of applicable laws, rules and/or regulations by Vendor, its subcontractors, or others for whom Vendor is responsible under its indemnity obligations provided for in this Agreement.
4.10.7 Water Quality.
4.10.7.1 Management and Compliance. To the extent applicable, Vendor’s Services must account for, and fully comply with, all local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations that may impact water quality compliance, including, without limitation, all applicable provisions of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. §§ 1300); the California Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act (Cal Water Code §§ 13000-14950); laws, rules and regulations of the Environmental Protection Agency, the State Water Resources Control Board and the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board; the Town’s ordinances regulating discharges of storm water; and any and all regulations, policies, or permits issued pursuant to any such authority regulating the discharge of pollutants, as that term is used in the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act, to any ground or surface water in the State.
4.10.7.2 Liability for Non-Compliance. Failure to comply with the laws, regulations and policies described in this Section is a violation of law that may subject Vendor or Town to penalties, fines, or additional regulatory requirements. Vendor shall defend, indemnify and hold the Town, its directors, officials, officers, employees, volunteers and agents free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, from and against any and all fines, penalties, claims or other regulatory requirements imposed as a result of Vendor’s noncompliance with the laws, regulations and policies described in this Section, unless such noncompliance is the result of the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Town, its officials, officers, agents, employees or authorized volunteers.
4.10.7.3 Training. In addition to any other standard of care requirements set forth in this Agreement, Vendor warrants that all employees and subcontractors shall have sufficient skill and experience to perform the Services assigned to them without impacting water quality in violation of the laws, regulations and policies described in this Section. Vendor further warrants that it, its employees and subcontractors will receive adequate training, as determined by Town, regarding the requirements of the laws, regulations and policies described in this Section as they may relate to the Services provided under this Agreement. Upon request, Town will provide Vendor with a list of training programs that meet the requirements of this paragraph.
5. PROJECT MANAGEMENT
5.1 Town’s Representative. The Town hereby designates Debbie Rivera, or her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement (“Town’s Representative”). Town’s Representative shall have the power to act on behalf of the Town for all purposes under this Agreement. Vendor shall not accept direction or orders from any person other than the Town’s Representative or his or her designee.
5.2 Vendor’s Representative. Vendor hereby designates Ganesh Muruganantham, or his or her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement (“Vendor’s Representative”). Vendor’s Representative shall have full authority to represent and act on behalf of the Vendor for all purposes under this Agreement. The Vendor’s Representative shall supervise and direct the Services, using his best skill and attention, and shall be responsible for
28314.00001/43446975.2
(BBK 2025)
- 7 -
all means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures and for the satisfactory coordination of all work required under this Agreement.
6. INSURANCE.
6.1 Time for Compliance. Vendor shall not commence work under this Agreement until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the Town that it has secured all insurance required under this Section. In addition, Vendor shall not allow any subcontractor to commence work on any subcontract until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the Town that the subcontractor has secured all insurance required under this Section.
6.2 Minimum Requirements. Vendor shall, at its expense, procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the Agreement by the Vendor, its agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. Vendor shall also require all of its subcontractors to procure and maintain the same insurance for the duration of the Agreement. Such insurance shall meet at least the following minimum levels of coverage:
6.2.1 Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as the latest version of the following: (1) General Liability: Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 0001); (2) Automobile Liability: Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form number CA 0001, code 1 (any auto); and (3) Workers’ Compensation and Employer’s Liability: Workers’ Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer’s Liability Insurance. The policy shall not contain any exclusion contrary to the Agreement, including but not limited to endorsements or provisions limiting coverage for (1) contractual liability (including but not limited to ISO CG 24 26 or 21 29); or (2) cross liability for claims or suits by one insured against another.
6.2.2 Minimum Limits of Insurance. Vendor shall maintain limits no less than: (1) General Liability: $2,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with general aggregate limit is used including, but not limited to, form CG 2503, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this Agreement/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit; (2) Automobile Liability: $2,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage; and (3) Workers’ Compensation and Employer’s Liability: Workers’ Compensation limits as required by the Labor Code of the State of California. Employer’s Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease. Defense costs shall be paid in addition to the limits.
6.2.3 Manufacturer of Goods. If Vendor is also the manufacturer of any equipment included in the Goods, Vendor shall carry Product Liability and/or Errors and Omissions Insurance which covers said equipment with limits of not less than $1,000,000.
6.2.4 Notices; Cancellation or Reduction of Coverage. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the expiration of any such policy, evidence showing that such insurance coverage has been renewed or extended shall be filed with the Town. If such coverage is cancelled or materially reduced, Vendor shall, within ten (10) days after receipt of written notice of such cancellation or reduction of coverage, file with the Town evidence of insurance showing that the required insurance has been reinstated or has been provided through another insurance company or companies. In the event any policy of insurance required under this Agreement does not comply with these specifications or is canceled and not replaced, the Town has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by the Town will be promptly
28314.00001/43446975.2
(BBK 2025)
- 8 -
reimbursed by Vendor or the Town may withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from Vendor payments. In the alternative, the Town may suspend or terminate this Agreement.
6.2.5 Additional Insured. The Town of Apple Valley, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers shall be named as additional insureds on Vendor’s and its subcontractors’ policies of commercial general liability and automobile liability insurance using the endorsements and forms specified herein or exact equivalents.
6.3 Insurance Endorsements. The insurance policies shall contain the following provisions, or Vendor shall provide endorsements on forms supplied or approved by the Town to add the following provisions to the insurance policies:
6.3.1 General Liability. The general liability policy shall include or be endorsed (amended) to state that: (1) using ISO CG forms 20 10 and 20 37, or endorsements providing the exact same coverage, the Town of Apple Valley, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers shall be covered as additional insured with respect to the Services or ongoing and complete operations performed by or on behalf of the Vendor, including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work; and (2) using ISO form 20 01, or endorsements providing the exact same coverage, the insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the Town, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers, or if excess, shall stand in an unbroken chain of coverage excess of the Vendor’s scheduled underlying coverage. Any excess insurance shall contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and noncontributory basis for the benefit of the Town, before the Town’s own primary insurance, deductible, or self-insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured. Any insurance, deductible, or self-insurance maintained by the Town, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers shall be excess of the Vendor’s insurance and shall not be called upon to contribute with it in any way. Notwithstanding the minimum limits set forth in Section 6.2.2, any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of coverage shall be available to the parties required to be named as additional insureds pursuant to this Section 6.3.1.
6.3.2 Automobile Liability. The automobile liability policy shall include or be endorsed (amended) to state that: (1) the Town, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers shall be covered as additional insureds with respect to the ownership, operation, maintenance, use, loading or unloading of any auto owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Vendor or for which the Vendor is responsible; and (2) the insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the Town, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers, or if excess, shall stand in an unbroken chain of coverage excess of the Vendor’s scheduled underlying coverage. Any insurance, deductible, or self-insurance maintained by the Town, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers shall be excess of the Vendor’s insurance and shall not be called upon to contribute with it in any way. Policy shall contain or be endorsed to contain such provisions. Notwithstanding the minimum limits set forth in Section 6.2.2, any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of coverage shall be available to the parties required to be named as additional insureds pursuant to this Section 6.3.2.
6.3.3 Workers’ Compensation and Employer’s Liability Coverage. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the Town, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers for losses paid under the terms of the insurance policy which arise from work performed by the Vendor.
28314.00001/43446975.2
(BBK 2025)
- 9 -
6.3.4 All Coverages. Each insurance policy required by this Agreement shall be endorsed to state that: (A) coverage shall not be suspended, voided, reduced or canceled except after thirty (30) days (10 days for nonpayment of premium) prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the Town; and (B) any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies, including breaches of warranties, shall not affect coverage provided to the Town, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers. Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the Town, its officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers, or any other additional insureds.
6.4 Separation of Insureds; No Special Limitations; Waiver of Subrogation. All insurance required by this Section shall contain standard separation of insureds provisions. In addition, such insurance shall not contain any special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the Town, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers.
Requirement of specific coverage or minimum limits contained in this Section are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits, or other requirement, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. All policies shall waive any right of subrogation of the insurer against the Town, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers, or any other additional insureds, or shall specifically allow Vendor or others providing insurance evidence in compliance with these specifications to waive their right of recovery prior to a loss. Vendor hereby waives its own right of recovery against Town, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers, or any other additional insureds, and shall require similar written express waivers and insurance clauses from each of its subcontractors.
6.5 Deductibles and Self-Insurance Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the Town. Vendor shall guarantee that, at the option of the Town, either: (1) the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or selfinsured retentions as respects the Town, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers; or (2) the Vendor shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigation costs, claims and administrative and defense expenses.
6.6 Subcontractor Insurance Requirements. Vendor shall not allow any subcontractors to commence work on any subcontract relating to the work under the Agreement until they have provided evidence satisfactory to the Town that they have secured all insurance required under this Section. If requested by Vendor, the Town may approve different scopes or minimum limits of insurance for particular subcontractors. The Vendor and the Town shall be named as additional insureds on all subcontractors’ policies of Commercial General Liability using ISO form 20 38, or coverage at least as broad.
6.7 Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating no less than A:VIII, licensed to do business in California, and satisfactory to the Town.
6.8 Verification of Coverage. Vendor shall furnish Town with original certificates of insurance and endorsements effecting coverage required by this Agreement on forms satisfactory to the Town. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy shall be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf, and shall be on forms provided by the Town if requested. All certificates and endorsements must be received and approved by the Town before work commences. The Town reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time.
28314.00001/43446975.2
(BBK 2025)
- 10 -
6.9 Reporting of Claims. Vendor shall report to the Town, in addition to Vendor’s insurer, any and all insurance claims submitted by Vendor in connection with the Services under this Agreement.
7. INDEMNIFICATION.
7.1 Scope of Indemnity. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Vendor shall defend, indemnify and hold the Town, its officials, employees, agents and volunteers free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, suits, actions, proceedings, costs, expenses, liability, judgments, awards, decrees, settlements, loss, damage or injury of any kind, in law or equity, regardless of whether the allegations are false, fraudulent, or groundless, to property or persons, including wrongful death, (collectively, “Claims”) in any manner arising out of, pertaining to, or incident to any acts, errors or omissions, or willful misconduct of Vendor, its officials, officers, employees, subcontractors, consultants or agents arising out of or in connection with the Services, the Goods or this Agreement, including without limitation the payment of all expert witness fees, attorneys’ fees and other related costs and expenses. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent required by Civil Code section 2782, Vendor’s indemnity obligation shall not apply to such loss or damage which is caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Town.
7.2 Additional Indemnity Obligations. Vendor shall defend, with counsel of Town’s choosing and at Vendor’s own cost, expense and risk, any and all Claims covered by this section that may be brought or instituted against Town or its officials, employees, agents and volunteers.
In addition, Vendor shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against Town or its officials, employees, agents and volunteers as part of any such claim, suit, action or other proceeding. Vendor shall also reimburse Town for the cost of any settlement paid by Town or its officials, employees, agents and volunteers as part of any such claim, suit, action or other proceeding. Such reimbursement shall include payment for Town’s attorney’s fees and costs, including expert witness fees. Vendor shall reimburse Town and its officials, employees, agents and volunteers, for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided. Vendor’s obligation to indemnify shall survive expiration or termination of this Agreement, and shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by the Town, its officials, employees, agents and volunteers.
8. CALIFORNIA LABOR CODE
8.1 Prevailing Wages. Vendor is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., (“Prevailing Wage Laws”), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on “public works” and “maintenance” projects. Since the Services are being performed as part of an applicable “public works” or “maintenance” project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and since the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Vendor agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. Town shall provide Vendor with a copy of the prevailing rates of per diem wages in effect at the commencement of this Agreement.
Vendor shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the Services available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at the Vendor’s principal place of business and at the project site. Vendor shall defend, indemnify and hold the Town, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. It is the intent of the parties to effectuate the requirements of sections 1771, 1774, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1813, and 1815 of the Labor Code within this
28314.00001/43446975.2
(BBK 2025)
- 11 -
Agreement, and Vendor shall therefore comply with such Labor Code sections to the fullest extent required by law.
8.2 Registration. Since the Services are being performed as part of an applicable “public works” or “maintenance” project, then pursuant to Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1, the Vendor and all subcontractors must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations. Vendor shall maintain registration for the duration of this Agreement and require the same of any subcontractor. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the contractor registration requirements mandated by Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1 shall not apply to work performed on a public works project that is exempt pursuant to the small project exemption specified in Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1.
8.3 Compliance Monitoring. This Agreement may also be subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations. It shall be Vendor’s sole responsibility to comply with all applicable registration and labor compliance requirements. Any stop orders issued by the Department of Industrial Relations against Vendor or any subcontractor that affect Vendor’s performance of Services, including any delay, shall be Vendor’s sole responsibility. Any delay arising out of or resulting from such stop orders shall be considered Vendor caused delay and shall not be compensable by the Town. Vendor shall defend, indemnify and hold the Town, its officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of stop orders issued by the Department of Industrial Relations against Vendor or any subcontractor.
9. SAFETY.
Vendor shall execute and maintain its work so as to avoid injury or damage to any person or property. In carrying out its services, the Vendor shall at all times be in compliance with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations, and shall exercise all necessary precautions for the safety of employees appropriate to the nature of the work and the conditions under which the work is to be performed. Safety precautions as applicable shall include, but shall not be limited to: (A) adequate life protection and lifesaving equipment and procedures; (B) instructions in accident prevention for all employees and subcontractors, such as safe walkways, scaffolds, fall protection ladders, bridges, gang planks, confined space procedures, trenching and shoring, equipment and other safety devices, equipment and wearing apparel as are necessary or lawfully required to prevent accidents or injuries; and (C) adequate facilities for the proper inspection and maintenance of all safety measures.
10. ACCOUNTING RECORDS.
Vendor shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to all costs and expenses incurred under this Agreement. All such records shall be clearly identifiable. Vendor shall allow a representative of Town during normal business hours to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement. Vendor shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to the Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment under this Agreement.
11. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT.
11.1 Grounds for Termination. Town may, by written notice to Vendor, terminate the whole or any part of this Agreement at any time and without cause by giving written notice to
28314.00001/43446975.2
(BBK 2025)
- 12 -
Vendor of such termination, and specifying the effective date thereof, at least seven (7) days before the effective date of such termination. Upon termination, Vendor shall be compensated only for those Services and Goods which have been adequately rendered to Town, and Vendor shall be entitled to no further compensation. If terminated for cause because the Vendor refused or failed to deliver the Goods, the Town may obtain Goods by whatever method it may deem expedient. If Town’s cost of obtaining the Goods, including compensation for additional managerial and administrative services, will exceed the unpaid balance of the Goods, Vendor will be liable for and will pay the difference to Town. Vendor may not terminate this Agreement except for cause. The rights and remedies of the Town provided in this Section shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law, equity or under this Agreement.
11.2 Effect of Termination. If this Agreement is terminated as provided herein, Town may require Vendor to provide all finished or unfinished documents and data and other information of any kind prepared by Vendor in connection with the performance of the Services under this Agreement. Vendor shall be required to provide such document and other information within fifteen (15) days of the request.
11.3 Additional Services. In the event this Agreement is terminated in whole or in part as provided herein, Town may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as it may determine appropriate, goods and services similar to those terminated.
12. GENERAL PROVISIONS.
12.1 Delivery of Notices. All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be given to the respective parties at the following address, or at such other address as the respective parties may provide in writing for this purpose:
Vendor:
Monument Warehouse, LLC.
1551 Mineral Springs Rd.
Elberton, GA 30635
Attn: Ganesh Muruganantham
Town:
Town of Apple Valley
14955 Dale Evans Parkway
Apple Valley, CA 92307
Attn: Debbie Rivera, Parks and Recreation Department
28314.00001/43446975.2
(BBK 2025)
- 13 -
With copy to:
Town of Apple Valley
14955 Dale Evans Parkway
Apple Valley, CA 92307
Attn: Town Attorney
Such notice shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed, forty-eight (48) hours after deposit in the U.S. Mail, first class postage prepaid and addressed to the party at its applicable address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service.
12.2 Subcontracting. Vendor shall not subcontract any portion of the work required by this Agreement, except as expressly stated herein, without prior written approval of Town.
Subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement.
12.3 Governing Law; Government Code Claim Compliance. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in San Bernardino County. In addition to any and all contract requirements pertaining to notices of and requests for compensation or payment for extra work, disputed work, claims and/or changed conditions, Vendor must comply with the claim procedures set forth in Government Code sections 900 et seq. prior to filing any lawsuit against the Town. Such Government Code claims and any subsequent lawsuit based upon the Government Code claims shall be limited to those matters that remain unresolved after all procedures pertaining to extra work, disputed work, claims, and/or changed conditions have been followed by Vendor. If no such Government Code claim is submitted, or if any prerequisite contractual requirements are not otherwise satisfied as specified herein, Vendor shall be barred from bringing and maintaining a valid lawsuit against the Town.
12.4 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement.
12.5 Town’s Right to Employ Other Vendors. Town reserves right to employ other Vendors in connection with the Goods and Services provided under this Agreement.
12.6 Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding on the successors and assigns of the parties.
12.7 Assignment or Transfer. Vendor shall not assign, hypothecate or transfer, either directly or by operation of law, this Agreement or any interest herein without the prior written consent of the Town. Any attempt to do so shall be null and void, and any assignees, hypothecates or transferees shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer.
12.8 Construction; References; Captions. Since the Parties or their agents have participated fully in the preparation of this Agreement, the language of this Agreement shall be construed simply, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any Party. Any term referencing time, days or period for performance shall be deemed calendar days and not work days. All references to Vendor include all personnel, employees, agents, and subcontractors of Vendor, except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. All references to Town include its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers except as otherwise specified in this