Arcadia City Council
June 21, 2022

1-2
1-3
$3K



A??7@F
A@

;@3>

@H;DA@?7@F3>
?B35F
)7BADF

>7J3@
$;J76,E7
7H7>AB?7@F

'397


A8


41,'%6
'5%4+26+10
+:7
BDA<75F
BDABAE7E
5A@EFDG5F;A@
A8
3
E7H7@EFADK
?G>F;83?;>K
D7E;67@F;3> 4G;>6;@9
I;F:


6I7>>;@9
G@;FE


A8
I:;5:
IAG>6
47
388AD634>7
+:7
'DA<75F
IAG>6

;@HA>H7
67?A>;F;A@
A8
3

EFADK
A88;57
4G;>6;@9
FIA
E;@9>7EFADK
5A??7D5;3>
4G;>6;@9E
3@6
F:7
7J;EF;@9
EGD8357
B3D=;@9
>AF

J;EF;@9
A@E;F7
EFDG5FGD7E
F:3F
IAG>6
EF3K
;@

B>357
;@5>G67
3@
EFADK
A88;57
4G;>6;@9
3
E;@9>7EFADK
4D;5=
4G;>6;@9
3@6
3
E;@9>7 EFADK
43@=
6D;H7
F:DAG9:
4GF
F:7
A88;57
4G;>6;@9
IAG>6
47
D7@AH3F76
+:7
'DA<75F
E;F7
;E
EGDDAG@676
4K
5A??7D5;3>
D7E;67@F;3>
3@6
A88;57
GE7E
 ')#.
#%-)4170&

(
D7CG;D7E
F:3F
3@
397@5K
3@3>KL7
F:7
BAF7@F;3>
7@H;DA@?7@F3>
;?B35FE
A8 ;FE
BDABAE76
35F;A@E
;@
3@
7@H;DA@?7@F3>
;?B35F
D7BADF
Q )R
7J57BF
;@
57DF3;@

>;?;F76
5;D5G?EF3@57E

&&
&(
'G4
)7E
A67
M

+:7

)
;E
F:7
H7DK
:73DF

A8

(

5..%7"2%3
6







3> BB F:



Q+:7
S8AD7?AEF

BD;@5;B>7T
;@
;@F7DBD7F;@9

(
;E
F:3F
F:7
#79;E>3FGD7
;@F7@676
F:7
35F
FA
47
D736
EA
3E
FA
388AD6
F:7
8G>>7EF
BAEE;4>7
BDAF75F;A@
FA
F:7
7@H;DA@?7@F
I;F:;@
F:7
D73EA@34>7
E5AB7
A8
F:7
EF3FGFADK
>3@9G397 R

/--5.*4*&3
'/2
"

&44&2
.6*2/.-&.4
6

",*'

&3/52$&3

(&.$8





3>
BB
F:






(
:3E
FIA
BD;?3DK
BGDBAE7E

;DEF

(
;E
67E;9@76
FA
;@8AD?
675;E;A@

?3=7DE
3@6
F:7
BG4>;5
34AGF
F:7
BAF7@F;3>
E;9@;8;53@F
7@H;DA@?7@F3>
78875FE
A8
3
BDA<75F


3>
A67
)79E
Q
(

G;67>;@7ER
M



3

Q FE
BGDBAE7
;E
FA

;@8AD?
F:7
BG4>;5
3@6
;FE
D7EBA@E;4>7
A88;5;3>E
A8
F:7
7@H;DA@?7@F3>
5A@E7CG7@57E
A8
F:7;D
675;E;A@E
478AD7
F:7K
3D7
?367
+:GE
F:7

)
SBDAF75FE
@AF
A@>K
F:7

7@H;DA@?7@F
4GF
3>EA
;@8AD?76
E7>89AH7D@?7@F TR

*4*9&.3
/'
/,&4"
",,&8
6

/"2%

/'

50&26*3/23





3> 6


+:7

)
:3E
477@
67E5D;476
3E
Q3@

7@H;DA@?7@F3>
S3>3D?
47>>T
I:AE7
BGDBAE7
;F
;E
FA
3>7DF
F:7
BG4>;5
3@6
;FE
D7EBA@E;4>7
A88;5;3>E
FA
7@H;DA@?7@F3>
5:3@97E
478AD7
F:7K
:3H7
D735:76
75A>A9;53>
BA;@FE
A8
@A
D7FGD@ R

&2+&,&8
&&0
&43
6&2
4)&

"8
6

%
/'
/24

/--<23





3>

BB
F:




Q
&2+&,&8
&43R

/5.48
/'
.8/
6
!/248




3> BB 6




*75A@6

(
D7CG;D7E
BG4>;5
397@5;7E
FA
3HA;6
AD
D76G57
7@H;DA@?7@F3>
63?397
I:7@
Q873E;4>7R
4K
D7CG;D;@9
Q7@H;DA@?7@F3>>K
EGB7D;ADR
3>F7D@3F;H7E
3@6
3>>
873E;4>7
?;F;93F;A@
?73EGD7E

(

G;67>;@7E
M



3

3@6

3&&
",3/

&2+&,&8
&43


3> BB F:
3F
BB





*4*9&.3
/'
/,&4"
",,&8


3> 6

3F

+:7

)
E7DH7E
FA
BDAH;67
397@5;7E
3@6
F:7
BG4>;5
I;F:
;@8AD?3F;A@
34AGF
F:7
7@H;DA@?7@F3>
;?B35FE
A8
3
BDABAE76
BDA<75F
3@6
FA
Q;67@F;8K
I3KE
F:3F
7@H;DA@?7@F3>
63?397
53@
47
3HA;676
AD
E;9@;8;53@F>K
D76G576 R
 (

G;67>;@7E

M


3

8
F:7
BDA<75F
I;>>
:3H7
3
E;9@;8;53@F
78875F
A@
F:7
7@H;DA@?7@F
F:7 397@5K
?3K
3BBDAH7
F:7
BDA<75F
A@>K
;8
;F
8;@6E
F:3F
;F
:3E
Q7>;?;@3F76
AD
EG4EF3@F;3>>K >7EE7@76
3>>
E;9@;8;53@F
78875FE
A@
F:7
7@H;DA@?7@F
I:7D7
873E;4>7R
3@6
F:3F
3@K

1-3
Cont.
$3K



A??7@F
A@

;@3>

@H;DA@?7@F3>
?B35F
)7BADF

>7J3@
$;J76,E7
7H7>AB?7@F

'397

A8

G@3HA;634>7
E;9@;8;53@F
78875FE
A@
F:7
7@H;DA@?7@F
3D7
Q3557BF34>7
6G7
FA
AH7DD;6;@9
5A@57D@E R
'G4
)7E
A67
M





3> A67
)79E
M



4



+:7

>736
397@5K
?3K
677?
3
B3DF;5G>3D
;?B35F
FA
47
;@E;9@;8;53@F
A@>K
;8
;F
BDA6G57E
D;9ADAGE
3@3>KE;E
3@6
5A@5D7F7
EG4EF3@F;3>
7H;67@57
<GEF;8K;@9
F:7
8;@6;@9
*.(3

/5.48
"2-

52&"5
6

*48
/'
".'/2%




3> BB 6





.:;>7
F:7
5AGDFE
D7H;7I
3@

)
GE;@9
3@
Q34GE7
A8
6;E5D7F;A@R
EF3@63D6
QF:7

D7H;7I;@9
5AGDF
;E
@AF
FA
SG@5D;F;53>>K
D7>K
A@
7H7DK
EFG6K
AD
3@3>KE;E
BD7E7@F76
4K
3
BDA<75F
BDABA@7@F
;@
EGBBADF
A8
;FE
BAE;F;A@

S5>73D>K
;@367CG3F7
AD
G@EGBBADF76
EFG6K
;E
7@F;F>76
FA
@A
<G6;5;3>
6787D7@57 TR

&2+&,&8
&43


3>
BB
F:
3F
B



7?B:3E;E
36676
CGAF;@9
"52&,
&*()43
-02/6&-&.4

33.
6
&(&.43
/'

.*6&23*48
/'

",*'/2.*"



3>
6





8@


E
F:7
5AGDF
EF3F76
;@

&2+&,&8
&43


BD7<G6;5;3>
34GE7
A8
6;E5D7F;A@
A55GDE
Q;8
F:7
83;>GD7
FA
;@5>G67
D7>7H3@F
;@8AD?3F;A@
BD75>G67E
;@8AD?76
675;E;A@?3=;@9
3@6
;@8AD?76
BG4>;5
B3DF;5;B3F;A@
F:7D74K
F:I3DF;@9
F:7
EF3FGFADK
9A3>E
A8
F:7
)

BDA57EE R

".
/"15*.
"04/2 *,%,*'&
&3$5&

&.4&2
6

/5.48
/'

4".*3,"53




3> BB F:





",".4&
*.&8"2%3
6

/.4&2&8
&.*.35,"
"4&2
"."(&-&.4

*34




3>
BB
F:





/5.48
/'

-"%/2
6
,

/2"%/

/5.48
"4&2

(&.$8




3>
BB
F:


 

$AD7
D757@F>K
F:7
3>;8AD@;3
*GBD7?7
AGDF
:3E
7?B:3E;L76
F:3F
.:7@
D7H;7I;@9
I:7F:7D
3
6;E5GEE;A@
;E
EG88;5;7@F
FA
E3F;E8K
 (
3

5AGDF
?GEF
47
E3F;E8;76
F:3F
F:7

)


;@5>G67E
EG88;5;7@F
67F3;>
FA

7@34>7
F:AE7
I:A
6;6
@AF
B3DF;5;B3F7
;@
;FE
BD7B3D3F;A@
FA
G@67DEF3@6
3@6
FA
5A@E;67D
?73@;@98G>>K
F:7
;EEG7E
F:7
BDABAE76
BDA<75F
D3;E7E
15;F3F;A@
A?;FF762
3@6


?3=7E
3
D73EA@34>7
788ADF
FA
EG4EF3@F;H7>K

5A@@75F
3
BDA<75FE
3;D
CG3>;FK
;?B35FE
FA
>;=7>K
:73>F:
5A@E7CG7@57E

*&22"

,5#
6

48
/'
2&3./




3> F:








5;F;@9
"52&,
&*()43

-02/6&-&.4

33.
6
&(&.43
/'

.*6&23*48
/'

",*'/2.*"



3> 6




Q.:7F:7D
AD
@AF
F:7
3>>7976
;@367CG35K
;E
F:7
5A?B>7F7
A?;EE;A@
A8
3
D7CG;D76
6;E5GEE;A@
AD
3
B3F7@F>K
;@367CG3F7
A@7B3D39D3B:
6;E5GEE;A@
67HA;6
A8
3@3>KE;E
F:7
D7H;7I;@9
5AGDF
?GEF
675;67
I:7F:7D
F:7

)
E7DH7E
;FE
BGDBAE7
3E
3@

;@8AD?3F;A@3>
6A5G?7@F R

*&22"

,5#
6

48
/'
2&3./

3> F:
3F


>F:AG9:
3@

397@5K
:3E
6;E5D7F;A@
FA
675;67
F:7
?3@@7D
A8
6;E5GEE;@9
BAF7@F;3>>K
E;9@;8;53@F
78875FE
;@
3@

)
Q3
D7H;7I;@9
5AGDF
?GEF
67F7D?;@7
I:7F:7D
F:7
6;E5GEE;A@
A8
3
BAF7@F;3>>K
E;9@;8;53@F
78875F
;E
EG88;5;7@F
AD
;@EG88;5;7@F
; 7 
I:7F:7D
F:7
)
5A?BADFE

I;F:
;FE
;@F7@676
8G@5F;A@
A8
;@5>G6;@9
S67F3;>
EG88;5;7@F
FA
7@34>7
F:AE7
I:A
6;6
@AF
B3DF;5;B3F7
;@
;FE
BD7B3D3F;A@
FA
G@67DEF3@6
3@6
FA
5A@E;67D
?73@;@98G>>K
F:7
;EEG7E
D3;E76
4K
F:7
BDABAE76
BDA<75F TR

3> F:
3F


5;F;@9

"+&23'*&,%

*4*9&.3
'/2

1-3
Cont.
1-4
$3K



A??7@F
A@

;@3>

@H;DA@?7@F3>
?B35F
)7BADF

>7J3@
$;J76,E7
7H7>AB?7@F

'397

A8

/$",

/.42/,
6

*48
/'

"+&23'*&,%





3> BB F:




Q+:7

67F7D?;@3F;A@
I:7F:7D
3
6;E5GEE;A@
;E
EG88;5;7@F
;E
@AF
EA>7>K
3
?3FF7D
A8
6;E57D@;@9
I:7F:7D
F:7D7
;E
EG4EF3@F;3>
7H;67@57
FA
EGBBADF
F:7
397@5KTE
835FG3>
5A@5>GE;A@E R

3> F:
3F


.:7F:7D
3
6;E5GEE;A@
A8
3
BAF7@F;3>
;?B35F
;E
EG88;5;7@F
QBD7E7@FE
3
?;J76
CG7EF;A@
A8
>3I
3@6
835F
E
EG5:
;F
;E
97@7D3>>K
EG4<75F
FA
;@67B7@67@F
D7H;7I
AI7H7D
G@67D>K;@9
835FG3>
67F7D?;@3F;A@EP;@5>G6;@9
8AD
7J3?B>7
3@
397@5KTE
675;E;A@
3E
FA
I:;5:
?7F:A6A>A9;7E
FA
7?B>AK
8AD
3@3>KL;@9
3@
7@H;DA@?7@F3>
78875FP?3K
I3DD3@F
6787D7@57 R

*&22"

,5#
6

48
/'
2&3./


3> F:
3F


E
F:7
AGDF
7?B:3E;L76

1.2:7F:7D
3
67E5D;BF;A@
A8
3@
7@H;DA@?7@F3>
;?B35F
;E
;@EG88;5;7@F 4753GE7
;F
>35=E
3@3>KE;E
AD
A?;FE
F:7
?39@;FG67
A8
F:7
;?B35F
;E
@AF
3 EG4EF3@F;3>
7H;67@57
CG7EF;A@

5A@5>GEADK
6;E5GEE;A@
A8
3@ 7@H;DA@?7@F3>
;?B35F
F:3F
3@

)
677?E
E;9@;8;53@F
53@
47
67F7D?;@76
4K
3
5AGDF
FA
47
;@367CG3F7
3E
3@
;@8AD?3F;A@3>
6A5G?7@F
I;F:AGF D787D7@57
FA
EG4EF3@F;3>
7H;67@57

*&22"

,5#
6

48
/'
2&3./

3> F:
3F


.7
8;@6
F:3F
F:7

)
BD7B3D76
4K

F:7
;FK
:7D7
;E
;@367CG3F7
8AD
F:7
D73EA@E
E7F
8ADF:
47>AI
 !
 *'4'
+5
7$56#06+#.
8+&'0%'
6*#6
6*'

41,'%6
"+..
#8'
+)0+(+%#06
&8'45'
/2#%65

')#4&+0)
#;#4&5
#0&
#;#4&175
#6'4+#.5
+4

7#.+6:
'#.6*

+5-
#0&
4''0*175'
#5
$3FF
397?3@@
'

 9 
3@6
D
'3G>


)AE7@87>6
':  
A8
F:7

7@H;DA@?7@F3>
5A@EG>F;@9
8;D?
*.'

D7H;7I76
F:7

)TE
3@3>KE;E
A8
F:7
'DA<75FTE

;?B35FE
A@
:3L3D6E
3@6
:3L3D6AGE
?3F7D;3>E
3;D
CG3>;FK
:73>F:
D;E=
3@6
9D77@:AGE7
93E7E
*.'
TE
5A??7@F
>7FF7D
3@6
-E
3D7
3FF35:76
3E

J:;4;F

3@6

F:7;D
5A??7@FE
3D7
4D;78>K
EG??3D;L76
:7D7


 *'


#+.5
61
&'37#6'.:
8#.7#6'
#0&
+6+)#6'
6*'

41,'%6<5

16'06+#.
#;#4&5
#0&
#;#4&175
#6'4+#.5
/2#%65
F
;E
I7>>7EF34>;E:76
F:3F

(
D7CG;D7E
3@3>KE;E
A8
FAJ;5
EA;>
5A@F3?;@3F;A@

F:3F
?3K
47
6;EFGD476
4K
3
'DA<75F
3@6
F:3F
F:7
78875FE
A8
F:;E
6;EFGD43@57
A@
:G?3@
:73>F:
3@6
F:7
7@H;DA@?7@F
?GEF
47
3@3>KL76

(
D7CG;D7E
3
8;@6;@9
F:3F
3

BDA<75F
:3E
3
QE;9@;8;53@F
78875F
A@
F:7
7@H;DA@?7@FR
;8
QF:7
7@H;DA@?7@F3>
78875FE
A8
3
BDA<75F
I;>>
53GE7
EG4EF3@F;3>
36H7DE7
78875FE
A@
:G?3@
47;@9E
7;F:7D
6;D75F>K
AD
;@6;D75F>K R
')
M

4

E
F:7
AGDF
A8
BB73>
D757@F>K
EF3F76
Q132
@7I
BDA<75F
>A53F76
;@
3@
3D73
F:3F
I;>>
7JBAE7
;FE
A55GB3@FE
FA
BD77J;EF;@9
63@97DAGE
BA>>GF3@FE
53@
47
E3;6
FA
:3H7
EG4EF3@F;3>
36H7DE7
78875F
A@
:G?3@
47;@9E R
",

5*,%*.(
.%53428

33.
6

"8

2&"

*2
5",*48
(-<4

*34
Q



6


R

1-8
1-4
Cont.
1-5
1-6
1-7
$3K



A??7@F
A@

;@3>

@H;DA@?7@F3>
?B35F
)7BADF

>7J3@
$;J76,E7
7H7>AB?7@F

'397

A8


3>
BB
#
/ *


3>
F
BB


+:7
7J;EF7@57
A8
FAJ;5
EA;>

5A@F3?;@3F;A@
3F
3
BDA<75F
E;F7
;E
3
E;9@;8;53@F
;?B35F
D7CG;D;@9
D7H;7I
3@6
?;F;93F;A@
;@
F:7

)
$5&&.
6

%
/'

*23



3> BB 6





33/$
/2

,&".&2
.64
6
!/3&-*4&

/--

/,,&(&

*34
Q


6
!/3&-*4&R






3> BB F:

 
+:;E
?;F;93F;A@
?3K
@AF
47
6787DD76
G@F;>
3
8GFGD7
F;?7
38F7D
'DA<75F
3BBDAH3>


5.%342/-
6

/5.48
/'
&.%/$*./



3>
BB
6





*4*9&.3
'/2
&30/.3*#,&
15*4"#,&
.64<,

&6
6

*48
/'

)5,"
*34"
Q

R






3> BB F:






7D7
F:7

)
H;A>3F7E

(
4753GE7
;F
83;>76
FA
367CG3F7>K
;@H7EF;93F7

:3L3D6AGE
5A@6;F;A@E
3F
F:7
'DA<75F
E;F7
I:;5:
BD7>G676
3@
355GD3F7
3@3>KE;E
A8
F:7
'DA<75FTE
;?B35FE
3@6
;F
D7>;7E
A@
6787DD76
?;F;93F;A@

;DEF
F:7

)TE
43E7>;@7
;E
;@5A?B>7F7
4753GE7
;F
83;>E
FA
;67@F;8K
F:7
>A53F;A@
7JF7@F
3@6
EAGD57
A8
7J;EF;@9
EA;>
5A@F3?;@3F;A@
3@6
:3L3D6AGE
EA;>
H3BAD
>7H7>E

H7DK

(
6A5G?7@F
?GEF
EF3DF
8DA?
3
Q43E7>;@7R
3EEG?BF;A@
+:7
 (

Q43E7>;@7R
;E
F:7
E7F
A8
7@H;DA@?7@F3>
5A@6;F;A@E
393;@EF
I:;5:
FA
5A?B3D7
3
BDA<75FTE
3@F;5;B3F76
;?B35FE


)
M



3
Q1,2@67D

(
F:7
>736
397@5K

473DE
3
4GD67@
FA
;@H7EF;93F7
BAF7@F;3>
7@H;DA@?7@F3>
;?B35FE R
48

".*4"4*/.

*34

/

6

48
/'
&2.





3> BB F:





E
*.'

BA;@FE
AGF
;@
AD67D
FA
BDAB7D>K
3EE7EE
F:7
BAF7@F;3>
;?B35F
366;F;A@3>
EA;>
E3?B>;@9
3@6
EA;>
H3BAD
E3?B>;@9
;E
@77676
J

B


*.'


EF3F7E
F:3F
Q182GDF:7D
3EE7EE?7@F
A8
F:7
EA;>
3@6
EA;>
H3BAD
5A@F3?;@3F;A@
;E
@757EE3DK
FA
;67@F;8K
3@6
6;E5>AE7
F:7
EAGD57
A8
F:7
5A@F3?;@3F;A@
3@6
F:7
>3F7D3>
3@6
H7DF;53>
7JF7@F
A8
F:7
5A@F3?;@3F;A@ R
%
+:;E
;@8AD?3F;A@
E:AG>6
47
8G>>K
6;E5>AE76
3@6
6;E5GEE76
;@
3
D7H;E76

)


%7JF
F:7

)
677?E
F:7
;?B35F
E;9@;8;53@F
I;F:AGF
7H;67@57
A8
F:7
@3FGD7
3@6
7JF7@F
A8
F:7
;?B35F
AD
F:7
5A@E7CG7@57E
F:7
5A@F3?;@3F;A@
?3K
:3H7
A@
:G?3@
:73>F:
*;?B>K
>347>;@9
3@
7@H;DA@?7@F3>
78875F
3E
QE;9@;8;53@FR
QI;F:AGF
355A?B3@K;@9
3@3>KE;E
A8
F:7
BDA<75FTE
;?B35F
N
;E
;@367CG3F7
FA
?77F
F:7
7@H;DA@?7@F3>
3EE7EE?7@F
D7CG;D7?7@FE
A8

( R

&2+&,&8
&&0
&43



3> BB F:
3F



;@3>>K
F:7
?;F;93F;A@
?73EGD7E
BDABAE76
FA
366D7EE
F:;E
E;9@;8;53@F
;?B35F
3>EA
H;A>3F7

(
#736
397@5;7E
?3K
6787D
8AD?G>3F;@9
?;F;93F;A@
G@F;>
38F7D
BDA<75F
3BBDAH3>
A@>K
QI:7@
;F
;E
;?BD35F;53>
AD
;@873E;4>7
FA
;@5>G67
F:AE7
67F3;>E
6GD;@9
F:7
BDA<75FTE
7@H;DA@?7@F3>
D7H;7I R

(

G;67>;@7E
M



 3

3&&
",3/





6

4"4&

*2
&3

%





3> BB F:



@

)
?GEF
3>EA

7JB>3;@
3@
397@5KTE
675;E;A@
FA
6787D
8;@3>;L;@9
F:7
EB75;8;5E
A8
?;F;93F;A@
2&3&26&
*,%

".4&&
6

*48
/'

".4&&




3> BB F:






@
.%".(&2&%

1-8
Cont.
$3K



A??7@F
A@

;@3>

@H;DA@?7@F3>
?B35F
)7BADF

>7J3@
$;J76,E7
7H7>AB?7@F

'397

A8

"#*4"43
&"(5&
.$
6

/5.48
/'
2".(&






3> BB 


F:7

AGDF
E7F
AGF
F:7
EF3@63D6
8AD
6787DD76
8AD?G>3F;A@
A8
?;F;93F;A@
?73EGD7E

QS787DD3>
A8
F:7
EB75;8;5E
A8
?;F;93F;A@
;E
B7D?;EE;4>7
I:7D7
F:7
>A53>
7@F;FK
5A??;FE
;FE7>8
FA
?;F;93F;A@
3@6
>;EFE
F:7
3>F7D@3F;H7E
FA
47
5A@E;67D76
3@3>KL76
3@6
BAEE;4>K
;@5ADBAD3F76
;@
F:7
?;F;93F;A@
B>3@
1;F3F;A@ 2
&@
F:7
AF:7D
:3@6
3@
397@5K
9A7E
FAA
83D
I:7@
;F
E;?B>K
D7CG;D7E
3
BDA<75F
3BB>;53@F
FA
A4F3;@
3
4;A>A9;53>
D7BADF
3@6
F:7@
5A?B>K
I;F:
3@K
D75A??7@63F;A@E
F:3F
?3K
47
?367
;@
F:7
D7BADF
1;F3F;A@ 2T

&'&.%
4)&

"8
6

*48
/'
26*.&
3502"


3> BB F:
3F
B




3> )BFD 6

 
8
?;F;93F;A@
;E
873E;4>7
4GF

;?BD35F;53>
3F
F:7
F;?7
A8
3
97@7D3>
B>3@
AD
LA@;@9
3?7@6?7@F
;F
;E
EG88;5;7@F
FA
3DF;5G>3F7
EB75;8;5
B7D8AD?3@57
5D;F7D;3
3@6
?3=7
8GDF:7D
3BBDAH3>E
5A@F;@97@F
A@
8;@6;@9
3
I3K
FA
?77F
F:7?
%
3F
BB







3> )BFD 6

 R


%
3F

+:7
AGDF
F:7@
D7<75F76
BDABAE76
?;F;93F;A@
4753GE7
Q1@2A
5D;F7D;3
AD
3>F7D@3F;H7E
FA
47
5A@E;67D76
3D7
E7F
AGF
)3F:7D
F:;E
?;F;93F;A@
?73EGD7
6A7E
@A
?AD7
F:3@
D7CG;D7
3
D7BADF
47
BD7B3D76
3@6
8A>>AI76
AD
3>>AI
3BBDAH3>
4K
3
5AG@FK
67B3DF?7@F
I;F:AGF
E7FF;@9
3@K
EF3@63D6E R
@
366;F;A@
FA
;67@F;8K;@9
B7D8AD?3@57
5D;F7D;3
3@
397@5K
E:AG>6
;67@F;8K
3>F7D@3F;H7E
AD
7J7?B>3DK
?73EGD7E
%

7D7
F:7
;FK
:3E
;?BDAB7D>K
6787DD76
?;F;93F;A@
A8
E;9@;8;53@F
:3L3D6AGE
;?B35FE
67EB;F7
:3H;@9
3>>
A8
F:7
;@8AD?3F;A@
@757EE3DK
FA
8AD?G>3F7
3
?;F;93F;A@
B>3@
+:7

)
EF3F7E
F:3F
F:7
'DA<75F
E;F7
I3E
BD7H;AGE>K
GE76
3E
3
>3G@6DK
835;>;FK
3@6
3
':3E7



*
8AG@6
F:3F
F:3F
:;EFAD;53>
GE7
D7EG>F76
;@
EA;>
3@6
EA;>
H3BAD
5A@F3?;@3F;A@
A@
F:7
'DA<75F
E;F7
3E
I7>>
3E
Q7>7H3F76
5A@57@FD3F;A@E
A8
47@L7@7
3@6
'

;@
EA;>
H3BAD
34AH7
3BB>;534>7
D7E;67@F;3>
E5D77@;@9
>7H7>E R
 )
B
 

+:7

)
F:7D78AD7
BDABAE7E
?;F;93F;A@
?73EGD7
$$0

I:;5:
QD7CG;D7E

3
EA;>
?3@397?7@F
B>3@
*$'
FA
47
BD7B3D76
FA
BDAB7D>K
:3@6>7
FD3@EBADF
3@6
6;EBAE7
A8
5A@F3?;@3F76
EA;>E
D7?AH76
8DA?
F:7
'DA<75F
E;F7 R
%
$$0
EF3F7E

F:3F
F:7
3BB>;53@F
67H7>AB7D
AD
5A@FD35FAD
I;>>
BD7B3D7
F:7
*$'
43E76
A@
F:7
8;@6;@9E
;@
F:7
*A;>
3@6
*A;>
-3BAD
@H7EF;93F;A@
BD7B3D76
8AD
F:7
'DA<75F
%
3F
 

 +:7
*A;>
3@6
*A;>
-3BAD
@H7EF;93F;A@
D7BADF
:3E
3>D736K
477@
BD7B3D76
3@6
;E ;@5>G676
3E
3@
BB7@6;J
FA
F:7

)
+:7D78AD7
F:7
;FK
:3E
3>>
A8
F:7
;@8AD?3F;A@
@757EE3DK
FA
BD7B3D7
EB75;8;5
?;F;93F;A@
?73EGD7E
3@6
;F
?GEF
6A
EA
$$0 83;>E
FA
;67@F;8K
EB75;8;5
B7D8AD?3@57
5D;F7D;3
E;?B>K
EF3F;@9
F:3F
F:7
*$'
I;>> QAGF>;@712
F:7
BDAB7D
E5D77@;@9
:3@6>;@9
5:3D35F7D;L3F;A@
FD3@EBADF3F;A@
3@6 6;EBAE3>
BDA576GD7E
8AD
5A@F3?;@3F76
EA;>E
A@
E;F7R
3@6
F:3F
;F
I;>>
;@5>G67
Q:73>F:
3@6
E387FK
FD3;@;@9
BDA576GD7E R
%
+:;E
3?AG@FE
FA
I:3F
F:7
5AGDF
67E5D;476
;@ .%".(&2&%
"#*4"43
&"(5&
I:7D7
3@
397@5K
:3E
E;?B>K
D7CG;D76
BD7B3D3F;A@
A8
3

1-8
Cont.
1-9
1-10
1-11
$3K



A??7@F
A@

;@3>

@H;DA@?7@F3>
?B35F
)7BADF

>7J3@
$;J76,E7
7H7>AB?7@F

'397

A8

D7BADF
3@6
EF3F76
F:3F
;F
I;>>
5A?B>K
I;F:
D75A??7@63F;A@E
;@
F:7
D7BADF
+:;E
;E
;?B7D?;EE;4>7
6787DD3>
A8
?;F;93F;A@
3@6
;?B7D?;EE;4>K
H39G7
?;F;93F;A@
+:7

)
3>EA
BDABAE7E
?;F;93F;A@
?73EGD7
$$0
I:;5:
QD7CG;D7E
H3BAD
?;F;93F;A@
47
67E;9@76
3@6
;?B>7?7@F76
8AD
@7I
EFDG5FGD7E
A@
F:7
'DA<75F
E;F7R
3@6
D7CG;D7E
;@6AAD
3;D
?A@;FAD;@9

)
B
 

$$0
EF3F7E
F:3F

F:7E7
?;F;93F;A@
67E;9@
873FGD7E
I;>>
47
BD7B3D76
;@
355AD63@57
I;F:
F:7
+*
-3BAD
@FDGE;A@
$;F;93F;A@
6H;EADK
3@6
F:3F
F:7
873FGD7E
I;>>
47
67E;9@76
EA
3E
FA
D76G57
H3BAD
;@FDGE;A@
47>AI
+*
*5D77@;@9
#7H7>E
#;=7
$$0 
F:;E

?;F;93F;A@
?73EGD7
I;>>
D7>K
A@
;@8AD?3F;A@
F:3F
;E
5GDD7@F>K
D736;>K
3H3;>34>7
3@6
K7F
6787DE
BD7B3D3F;A@
A8
F:7
?;F;93F;A@
G@F;>
38F7D
BDA<75F
3BBDAH3>
+:;E
;E
;?BDAB7D
G@67D

(
3@6
D7@67DE
;F
;?BAEE;4>7
8AD
F:7
BG4>;5
FA
:3H7
3
DA>7
;@
3EE7EE;@9
I:7F:7D
?;F;93F;A@
;E
367CG3F7


+:7

)
6;6
@AF
7JB>3;@
I:K
;F
I3E
;@873E;4>7
FA
8AD?G>3F7
3@6
6;E5>AE7
3
EA;>
?3@397?7@F
B>3@
3@6
H3BAD
?;F;93F;A@
67E;9@
873FGD7E
@AI
3F
F:7
F;?7
A8
3BBDAH3>
D3F:7D
F:3@
3F
EA?7
8GFGD7
63F7
+:7

)TE
D7>;3@57
A@
8GFGD7
H39G7
35F;A@E
FA

;67@F;8K
3@6
5>73@GB
5A@F3?;@3F;A@
3F
F:7
E;F7
;E
5A@FD3DK
FA
 (
4753GE7
;F
83;>E
FA

BDAH;67
F:7
BG4>;5
I;F:
3
5:3@57
FA
D7H;7I
3@6
5A??7@F
A@
F:7
?;F;93F;A@
$AD7AH7D
I;F:AGF
=@AI;@9
F:7
7JF7@F
A8
F:7
5A@F3?;@3F;A@
AD
;?B35F
F:7
;FK
>35=E
7H;67@57
FA
EGBBADF
3
8;@6;@9
F:3F
$$
0

3@6
$$0
3D7
EG88;5;7@F
FA
D76G57

F:7
;?B35F
FA
>7EEF:3@E;9@;8;53@F


 *'



'.+'&
10
!057$56#06+#6'&
0276

#4#/'6'45
61
56+/#6'

41,'%6
/+55+105
#0&
*75
6*'

41,'%6
#:

'57.6
+0
+)0+(+%#06
+4

7#.+6:
/2#%65
*.'

8AG@6
F:3F
F:7

)
;@5ADD75F>K
7EF;?3F76
F:7
'DA<75FTE
AB7D3F;A@3>

7?;EE;A@E
3@6
F:7D78AD7
53@@AF
47
D7>;76
GBA@
FA
67F7D?;@7
F:7
E;9@;8;53@57
A8
F:7
'DA<75FTE
;?B35FE
A@
>A53>
3@6
D79;A@3>
3;D
CG3>;FK
+:7
)
D7>;7E
A@
7?;EE;A@E

53>5G>3F76
8DA?
F:7
3>;8AD@;3

?;EE;A@E

EF;?3FAD
-7DE;A@
3>

$A6




Q3>

$A6R

)
B



+:;E
?A67>
I:;5:
;E
GE76
FA
97@7D3F7
3
BDA<75FTE

5A@EFDG5F;A@
3@6
AB7D3F;A@3>
7?;EE;A@E
D7>;7E
A@
D75A??7@676
6783G>F
H3>G7E
43E76
A@
E;F7
EB75;8;5
;@8AD?3F;A@
D7>3F76
FA
3
@G?47D
A8
835FADE
J

B


(

D7CG;D7E
3@K
5:3@97E
FA
F:7
6783G>F
H3>G7E
FA
47
<GEF;8;76
4K
EG4EF3@F;3>
7H;67@57
%
*.'

D7H;7I76
F:7

)TE
3>

$A6
AGFBGF
8;>7E
3@6
8AG@6
F:3F
A@7
A8
F:7

H3>G7E
;@BGF
;@FA
F:7
?A67>
I3E
;@5A@E;EF7@F
I;F:
;@8AD?3F;A@
BDAH;676
;@
F:7
)

J

B

*B75;8;53>>K
*.'

8AG@6
F:3F
F:7

)
5:3@976
?A67>
6783G>FE
4K

;@5>G6;@9
7@7D9KD7>3F76
?;F;93F;A@
?73EGD7E
4GF
F:7
<GEF;8;53F;A@
8AD
F:;E
5:3@97
;E
;@EG88;5;7@F
8AD
F:D77
D73EA@E

1-11
Cont.
1-12
$3K



A??7@F
A@

;@3>

@H;DA@?7@F3>
?B35F
)7BADF

>7J3@
$;J76,E7
7H7>AB?7@F

'397

A8

;DEF
F:7

)
?3=7E
@A
?7@F;A@
A8
F:7
'DA<75F
;@5>G6;@9
3@
A@E;F7
EA>3D
EKEF7?
3B3DF
8DA?
;@5>GE;A@
A8
3
EKEF7?
;@
F:7

)TE
3>

$&
3@3>KE;E
!GEF

4753GE7
DAA8E
3D7
EA>3DD736K
6A7E
@AF
?73@
F:7
'DA<75F
I;>>
35FG3>>K
;@5ADBAD3F7
EA>3D
B3@7>E

J

3F

,@>7EE
F:7

)
AD
;FE
?;F;93F;A@
?73EGD7E
EB75;8K
F:3F
F:7

'DA<75F
;@5>G67E
EA>3D
B3@7>E
F:7K
E:AG>6
@AF
47
;@5>G676
3E
?;F;93F;A@
;@
F:7
)TE

3>

$&
3;D
CG3>;FK
3@3>KE;E
?A67>
%
*.'

F:7D78AD7
5A@5>G676
F:3F
F:7

;@5>GE;A@
A8
3@
7@7D9KD7>3F76
?;F;93F;A@
?73EGD7
;@
3;D
?A67>;@9
G@67D7EF;?3F76
F:7
'DA<75FTE
AB7D3F;A@3>
7?;EE;A@E
+:7
'DA<75FTE
AB7D3F;A@3>
7?;EE;A@E
3E
7EF;?3F76
;@
F:7

)
53@@AF
47
D7>;76
GBA@
FA
67F7D?;@7
F:7
E;9@;8;53@57
A8
F:7
'DA<75FTE
3;D
CG3>;FK
;?B35FE

 *'4'
+5
7$56#06+#.
8+&'0%'
6*#6
6*'

41,'%6
#:
#8'
#
+)0+(+%#06
'#.6*
/2#%6
#5
#

'57.6
1(
+'5'.

#46+%7.#6'
/+55+105
&@7
A8
F:7
BD;?3DK
7?;EE;A@E
A8
5A@57D@
D793D6;@9
:73>F:
78875FE
8AD
>3@6
67H7>AB?7@F
BDA<75FE
;E
6;7E7>
B3DF;5G>3F7
?3FF7D
Q'$R
I:;5:
53@
47
D7>73E76
6GD;@9
'DA<75F
5A@EFDG5F;A@
3@6
AB7D3F;A@
'$
5A@E;EFE
A8
8;@7
B3DF;5>7E
I;F:
3
6;3?7F7D
>7EE
F:3@


?;5DA?7F7DE
;@5>G6;@9
3
EG49DAGB
A8
G>FD38;@7
B3DF;5>7E
I;F:
3
6;3?7F7D
>7EE
F:3@

?;5DA?7F7DE
;7E7>
7J:3GEF
3>EA
5A@F3;@E
3
H3D;7FK
A8
:3D?8G>
93E7E
3@6
53@57D53GE;@9
EG4EF3@57E

JBAEGD7
FA
'$
;E
3
D75A9@;L76

:73>F:
:3L3D6
B3DF;5G>3D>K
FA
5:;>6D7@
I:AE7
>G@9E
3D7
EF;>>
67H7>AB;@9
3@6
F:7
7>67D>K
I:A
?3K
:3H7
AF:7D
E7D;AGE
:73>F:
BDA4>7?E
55AD6;@9
FA
F:7
3>;8AD@;3
;D
)7EAGD57E
A3D6
Q)R
'$
7JBAEGD7
?3K
>736
FA
F:7
8A>>AI;@9
36H7DE7
:73>F:
78875FE
399D3H3F76
3EF:?3
5:DA@;5
4DA@5:;F;E
;@5D73E76
D7EB;D3FADK
3@6
53D6;AH3E5G>3D
:AEB;F3>;L3F;A@E
675D73E76
>G@9
8G@5F;A@
;@
5:;>6D7@
>G@9
53@57D
3@6
BD7?3FGD7
673F:E
8AD
F:AE7
I;F:
:73DF
AD
>G@9
6;E73E7  +:7

)
5A@5>G676
F:3F
F:7
?;F;93F76
7J57EE
53@57D
D;E=
BAE76
4K
F:7
'DA<75F
FA
@73D4K
E7@E;F;H7
D757BFADE
IAG>6
@AF
7J5776
F:7
*($
E;9@;8;53@57
F:D7E:A>6
A8

;@
A@7
?;>>;A@

J

B


)
B


AI7H7D
*.'

BA;@FE
AGF
F:3F

F:7

)
83;>76
FA
Q?7@F;A@
AD
7H3>G3F7
F:7
FAJ;5
3;D
5A@F3?;@3@F
Q+R
7?;EE;A@E
3EEA5;3F76
I;F:
'DA<75F
AB7D3F;A@ R

J

B

*.'

;67@F;8;7E
8AGD
?3;@
D73EA@E

8AD
I:K
F:7

)TE
7H3>G3F;A@
A8
:73>F:
D;E=
;?B35FE
3@6
EG4E7CG7@F
>7EEF:3@ E;9@;8;53@F
5A@5>GE;A@
;E
;@5ADD75F

;DEF
F:7

)TE
5A@EFDG5F;A@D7>3F76
73>F:
);E=
EE7EE?7@F
Q)R
;E
G@EG4EF3@F;3F76
6G7
FA
F:7

)TE
83;>GD7
FA
BDAH;67
;@BGF
B3D3?7F7DE
3@6
?A67>;@9

3EEG?BF;A@E
%
.:;>7
F:7

)
EF3F7E
F:3F
F:AE7
H3>G7E
3D7
;@5>G676
*.'
TE

D7H;7I
8AG@6
F:3F
E7H7D3>
=7K
835FADE
I7D7
@AF
6;E5>AE76
3@6
*.'
I3E
F:7D78AD7








!


"
"#


$!

 
"



##

"

!

"
"#$!  

1-12
Cont.
1-13
1-14
1-15
1-16
$3K



A??7@F
A@

;@3>

@H;DA@?7@F3>
?B35F
)7BADF

>7J3@
$;J76,E7
7H7>AB?7@F

'397

A8

G@34>7
FA
H7D;8K
I:7F:7D
F:7
'DA<75FTE
5A@EFDG5F;A@D7>3F76
53@57D
D;E=
;E
355GD3F7>K
D7BADF76
%


*75A@6
4753GE7
F:7

)
6;6
@AF
BD7B3D7
3
CG3@F;8;76
AB7D3F;A@3>
)
;F

83;>76
FA
CG3@F;F;H7>K
7H3>G3F7
AB7D3F;A@3>
FAJ;5
3;D
5A@F3?;@3@FE
Q+ER
J

B

 @
83;>;@9
FA
5A@@75F
+
7?;EE;A@E
FA
BAF7@F;3>
:73>F:
D;E=E
FA
@73D4K
D757BFADE F:7
'DA<75F
83;>E
FA
?77F
F:7

(
D7CG;D7?7@F
F:3F
BDA<75FE
5ADD7>3F7
;@5D73E7E
;@
BDA<75F97@7D3F76
7?;EE;A@E
FA
36H7DE7
;?B35FE
A@
:G?3@
:73>F:
53GE7
4K
F:AE7 7?;EE;A@E
%

&&

*&22"

,5#
6

/5.48
/'
2&3./




3> F:





+:;D6
F:7
3>;8AD@;3
7B3DF?7@F
A8
!GEF;57
D75A??7@6E
F:7
BD7B3D3F;A@
A8
3
CG3@F;F3F;H7
)
BGDEG3@F
FA
F:7
&88;57
A8

@H;DA@?7@F3>
73>F:
3L3D6

EE7EE?7@F
Q&
R
F:7
AD93@;L3F;A@
D7EBA@E;4>7
8AD
BDAH;6;@9
9G;63@57
A@
5A@6G5F;@9
)E
;@
3>;8AD@;3
3E
I7>>
3E
>A53>
3;D
6;EFD;5F
9G;67>;@7E
& 

D7>73E76
;FE
?AEF
D757@F
9G;63@57
6A5G?7@F
;@


67E5D;4;@9
I:;5:
FKB7E
A8

BDA<75FE
I3DD3@F
BD7B3D3F;A@
A8
3@
)

&&
Q);E=
EE7EE?7@F

G;67>;@7E

G;63@57
$3@G3>
8AD
'D7B3D3F;A@
A8
73>F:
);E=
EE7EE?7@FE R
& 

74DG3DK


"6"*,"#,&
"4
:FFBE

A7::3 53 9AH
?76;3
6AI@>A36E
5D@D

9G;63@57

?3@G3> B68
+:7
&

6A5G?7@F
D75A??7@6E
F:3F
3>>
E:ADFF7D?
BDA<75FE
>3EF;@9
3F
>73EF


?A@F:E
3EE7EE
53@57D
D;E=E

J

B

66;F;A@3>>K
;8
3
BDA<75F
;E

7JB75F76
FA
>3EF
AH7D

?A@F:E
F:7
7JBAEGD7
E:AG>6
47
7H3>G3F76
F:DAG9:AGF
F:7
BDA<75F
GE;@9
3

K73D
7JBAEGD7
6GD3F;A@
FA
7EF;?3F7
;@6;H;6G3>
53@57D
D;E=E
%
3E76
A@
;FE
7JF7@E;H7
7JB7D;7@57
*.'

D73EA@34>K
3EEG?7E
F:3F
F:7
'DA<75F
I;>>

>3EF
3F
>73EF


K73DE
3@6
F:7D78AD7
D75A??7@6E
F:3F
:73>F:
D;E=
;?B35FE
8DA?
F:7
BDA<75F
47
7H3>G3F76
%

)7H;E76

)
;E
F:7D78AD7
D7CG;D76
FA
3@3>KL7
F:7E7

;?B35FE

AGDF:
F:7

)
83;>E
FA
7H3>G3F7
F:7
5A?4;@76
>;87F;?7
53@57D
D;E=
FA
@73D4K
7J;EF;@9
D757BFADE
3E
3
D7EG>F
A8
'DA<75F
5A@EFDG5F;A@
3@6
AB7D3F;A@
FA97F:7D
J


B 

)7H;E76

)
E:AG>6
47
BD7B3D76
FA
CG3@F;8K
F:7
5A?4;@76
7J57EE
53@57D
D;E= BAE76
4K
F:7
'DA<75FTE
5A@EFDG5F;A@
3@6
AB7D3F;A@
FA
@73D4K
7J;EF;@9
D757BFADE
3@6 5A?B3D7
;F
FA
F:7
*($
F:D7E:A>6
A8

;@
A@7
?;>>;A@
%
*.'

BD7B3D76
3
E5D77@;@9>7H7>
)
FA
7H3>G3F7
BAF7@F;3>
;?B35FE
8DA?
'DA<75F
5A@EFDG5F;A@
GE;@9

)*)

%
3
E5D77@;@9>7H7>
3;D
CG3>;FK
6;EB7DE;A@

?A67>

J

B


*.'

3BB>;76
3
E7@E;F;H7
D757BFAD
6;EF3@57
A8

?7F7DE

3@6
3@3>KL76
;?B35FE
FA
;@6;H;6G3>E
3F
6;887D7@F
EF397E
A8
>;87
43E76
A@
& 
3@6

*($
9G;63@57
GF;>;L;@9
397
E7@E;F;H;FK
835FADE
%


*.'

8AG@6
F:3F
F:7
7J57EE
53@57D
D;E=
3F
3
E7@E;F;H7
D757BFAD
>A53F76
3BBDAJ;?3F7>K

?7F7DE
3I3K
AH7D
F:7
5AGDE7
A8
'DA<75F
5A@EFDG5F;A@
;E
3BBDAJ;?3F7>K
 
;@
A@7
?;>>;A@
8AD
5:;>6D7@
%
3F

$AD7AH7D
6*'
'9%'55

.+('6+/'
%#0%'4
4+5-
18'4
6*'
%1745'
1(

41,'%6
%105647%6+10
#0&
12'4#6+10
1(

1-19
1-17
1-18
$3K



A??7@F
A@

;@3>

@H;DA@?7@F3>
?B35F
)7BADF

>7J3@
$;J76,E7
7H7>AB?7@F

'397

A8


:'#45
+5
#22419+/#6'.:



+0
10'
/+..+10
%
+:7
D;E=E
FA
5:;>6D7@
3@6

>;87F;?7
D7E;67@FE
7J5776
*($TE
F:D7E:A>6
A8

;@
A@7
?;>>;A@

*.'
TE
3@3>KE;E
5A@EF;FGF7E
EG4EF3@F;3>
7H;67@57
F:3F
F:7
'DA<75F
?3K
:3H7
3
E;9@;8;53@F
:73>F:
;?B35F
3E
3
D7EG>F
A8
6;7E7>
B3DF;5G>3F7
7?;EE;A@E
*.'

D75A??7@6E
F:3F
Q3@
GB63F76

)
12
47
BD7B3D76
FA
;@5>G67
3
D78;@76
:73>F:
D;E=

3@3>KE;E
I:;5:
367CG3F7>K
3@6
355GD3F7>K
7H3>G3F7E
:73>F:
D;E=
;?B35FE
3EEA5;3F76
I;F:
4AF:
'DA<75F
5A@EFDG5F;A@
3@6
AB7D3F;A@ R

J

B

 *'


#+.'&
61
&'37#6'.:
0#.:;'
6*'

41,'%6<5
4''0*175'
#5
/2#%65
#0&
*75
6*'

41,'%6
#:

'57.6
+0
+)0+(+%#06
4''0*175'
#5
/+55+105
+:7

)
7EF;?3F7E
F:3F
F:7
'DA<75F
IAG>6
97@7D3F7
@7F
3@@G3>

7?;EE;A@E
A8

 
?7FD;5
FA@E
A8
53D4A@
6;AJ;67
7CG;H3>7@F
B7D
K73D
Q$+
&
7 K73DR

)
B
 

O
 

+:7

)
D7>;7E
A@
F:7
'DA<75FTE
5A@E;EF7@5K

I;F:
F:7
*




)+'
**
3@6
)
>;?3F7
:3@97
*5AB;@9
'>3@
FA

5A@5>G67
F:3F

;?B35FE
IAG>6
47
>7EE
F:3@
E;9@;8;53@F

J

B



)
B

 

O
 
AI7H7D
*.'

EF3F7E
F:3F
F:7

)TE
5A@5>GE;A@
34AGF
3
>7EE
F:3@E;9@;8;53@F
9D77@:AGE7
93E
;?B35F
;E
;@5ADD75F
8AD
F:D77
D73EA@E

 +:7

)TE
CG3@F;F3F;H7

3@3>KE;E
D7>;7E
GBA@
3@
;@5ADD75F
3@6
G@EG4EF3@F;3F76
3;D
?A67>

 +:7

)
83;>E
FA
5A@E;67D
F:7
B7D8AD?3@5743E76
EF3@63D6E
G@67D )TE

$/0*.(
,".
3@6
 +:7

)
83;>E
FA
5A@E;67D
F:7
B7D8AD?3@5743E76
EF3@63D6E
G@67D *
TE



*.'
TE
3@3>KE;E
67?A@EFD3F7E
BAF7@F;3>>K
E;9@;8;53@F
:73>F:
D;E=
3;D
CG3>;FK
3@6

;?B35FE
8DA?
F:7
BDA<75F
F:3F
@757EE;F3F7
?;F;93F;A@

)7H;E76
)
E:AG>6

47
BD7B3D76
I:;5:
;@5>G67E
3@
GB63F76
:3L3D6E
3;D
CG3>;FK
:73>F:
D;E=
3@6

3@3>KE;E
3@6
E:AG>6
BDABAE7
873E;4>7
?73EGD7E
FA
?;F;93F7
3@K
E;9@;8;53@F
;?B35FE

 *'

41,'%6
"+..
#8'
#
+)0+(+%#06
7/7.#6+8'
/2#%6
10

127.#6+10
#0&
175+0)

(
EF3@63D6E
D7CG;D7

)E
FA
3EE7EE
9DAIF:;@6G5;@9
;?B35FE
A8
3

BDABAE76
BDA<75F
')
M

4
+:7

(

G;67>;@7E
BDAH;67
F:3F
3
BDA<75F

I;>>
:3H7
3
E;9@;8;53@F
9DAIF:;@6G5;@9
;?B35F
;8
;F
IAG>6
Q;@6G57
EG4EF3@F;3>
G@B>3@@76
BABG>3F;A@
9DAIF:
;@
3@
3D73
7;F:7D
6;D75F>K
8AD
7J3?B>7
4K
BDABAE;@9
@7I
:A?7E
3@6
4GE;@7EE7E
AD
;@6;D75F>K
8AD
7J3?B>7
F:DAG9:
7JF7@E;A@
A8
DA36E
AD
AF:7D
;@8D3EFDG5FGD7 R
E
7JB>3;@76
;@
)
+;F


M




7
F:;E
3@3>KE;E
;E

;?BADF3@F
4753GE7
Q1;2@5D73E7E
;@
F:7
BABG>3F;A@
?3K
F3J
7J;EF;@9
5A??G@;FK
E7DH;57
835;>;F;7E
D7CG;D;@9
5A@EFDG5F;A@
A8
@7I
835;>;F;7E
F:3F
5AG>6
53GE7
E;9@;8;53@F
1-16
Cont.

1-19
Cont.
1-20
$3K



A??7@F
A@

;@3>

@H;DA@?7@F3>
?B35F
)7BADF

>7J3@
$;J76,E7
7H7>AB?7@F

'397

A8

7@H;DA@?7@F3>
78875FE R
+:;E
;@5>G67E
BAF7@F;3>
;?B35FE
A@
BG4>;5
E7DH;57E
FD3@EBADF3F;A@
3@6
9D77@:AGE7
93E7E
3?A@9
AF:7DE


66;F;A@3>>K
3@

)
?GEF
6;E5GEE
E;9@;8;53@F
5G?G>3F;H7
;?B35FE

(

G;67>;@7E
E75F;A@



3
Q+:7
5G?G>3F;H7
;?B35F
8DA?
E7H7D3>
BDA<75FE
;E
F:7
5:3@97
;@
F:7
7@H;DA@?7@F
I:;5:
D7EG>FE
8DA?
F:7
;@5D7?7@F3>
;?B35F
A8
F:7
BDA<75F
I:7@
36676
FA
AF:7D
5>AE7>K
D7>3F76
B3EF
BD7E7@F
3@6
D73EA@34>K
8AD7E7734>7
BDA434>7
8GFGD7
BDA<75FE
G?G>3F;H7
;?B35FE
53@
D7EG>F
8DA?
;@6;H;6G3>>K
?;@AD
4GF
5A>>75F;H7>K
E;9@;8;53@F
BDA<75FE
F3=;@9
B>357
AH7D
3
B7D;A6
A8
F;?7 R
/--5.*4*&3
'/2
"

&44&2
.6*2/.-&.4
6

",
&3/52$&3

(&.$8
:


6


;






3> BB F:





7D7
F:7

)
EF3F7E
F:3F
BDA<75FE
I;F:;@
A@7
?;>7
A8
F:7
'DA<75F
E;F7
I;>>
5G?G>3F;H7>K
366

@7I
:AGE;@9
G@;FE

)
B




.:7@
36676
FA
F:7

'DA<75FTE
7JB75F76


G@;FE
F:;E
4D;@9E
F:7
5G?G>3F;H7
FAF3>
FA


G@;FE
%
+:7

;FK
A8
D536;3
5GDD7@F>K
:3E



G@;FE
F:7D78AD7
F:7
BDABAE76
'DA<75F
3@6
F:7

5G?G>3F;H7
BDA<75FE
>;EF76
;@
F:7

)
I;>>
4D;@9
F:7
FAF3>
;FK
G@;FE
FA



4K


+:7
*AGF:7D@
3>;8AD@;3
EEA5;3F;A@
A8

AH7D@?7@FE
*

7EF;?3F7E
F:3F



G@;FE
I;>>
47
4G;>F
;@
F:7
;FK
4K


%
+:7
;FK
A8
D536;3
IAG>6
F:7D78AD7

47
>;?;F76
FA
4G;>6;@9
A@>K


@7I
G@;FE
;@
F:7
@7JF

K73DE
;@
AD67D
FA
EF3K
I;F:;@

*

7EF;?3F7E


,@>7EE
F:7
;FK
:3E
3
?AD3FAD;G?
;@
B>357
I:;5:
I;>>
E7H7D7>K
>;?;F
:AGE;@9
F:3F
53@
47
4G;>F
;@
F:7
;FK
;@
F:7
@7JF

K73DE
I:;5:
6A7E
@AF
3BB73D
FA
47
F:7

53E7
F:7
'DA<75F
I;>>
;@6776
:3H7
3
E;9@;8;53@F
5G?G>3F;H7
;?B35F
A@
BABG>3F;A@
3@6
:AGE;@9
66;F;A@3>>K
F:7
?3<AD;FK
A8
F:7
BDA<75FE
;@5>G676
;@
F:7
 )TE
5G?G>3F;H7

;?B35FE
3@3>KE;E
3D7
7;F:7D
;@
B>3@@;@9
D7H;7I
B>3@
5:75=
AD
3>D736K
G@67D
5A@EFDG5F;A@

)
B




O




G7
FA
F:7
34E7@57
A8
BDA<75FE
I:;5:
3D7

E;?B>K
BDABAE76
F:7

)
6A7E
@AF
3BB73D
FA
:3H7
;@5>G676
BDA<75FE
;@
F:7

5G?G>3F;H7
;?B35FE
3@3>KE;E
I:;5:
3D7
QD73EA@34>K
8AD7E7734>7
BDA434>7
8GFGD7
BDA<75FER
3E
D7CG;D76
4K

(
9G;67>;@7E
+:;E
8GDF:7D
EG997EFE
F:3F
F:7
'DA<75F
I;>>
:3H7
3
E;9@;8;53@F
5G?G>3F;H7
;?B35F
A@
BABG>3F;A@
3@6
:AGE;@9
7EB75;3>>K
5A@E;67D;@9
F:3F
F:7
'DA<75F
BDABAE7E
83D
?AD7
G@;FE
F:3@
3@K
A8
F:7
AF:7D

BDA<75FE
;@5>G676
;@
F:7
5G?G>3F;H7
;?B35FE
3@3>KE;E

+:7
'DA<75F
I;>>
F:7D78AD7
:3H7
3
5G?G>3F;H7>K
E;9@;8;53@F
;?B35F
A@
BABG>3F;A@
3@6
:AGE;@9
3@6
F:7
;FK
?GEF
BD7B3D7
3
)7H;E76

)
I:;5:
BDAB7D>K
3@3>KL7E
3@6

?;F;93F7E
F:;E
;?B35F
AD
I:;5:
BD7B3D7E
3
EF3F7?7@F
A8
AH7DD;6;@9
5A@E;67D3F;A@E
;8
;F
;E
5A@E;67D76
E;9@;8;53@F
3@6
G@3HA;634>7

1-21
$3K



A??7@F
A@

;@3>

@H;DA@?7@F3>
?B35F
)7BADF

>7J3@
$;J76,E7
7H7>AB?7@F

'397

A8

 !

AD
F:7
8AD79A;@9
D73EA@E
*

)
47>;7H7E
F:3F
F:7

)
;E
I:A>>K
;@367CG3F7
*

)
GD97E
F:7
'>3@@;@9
A??;EE;A@
FA
D78D3;@
8DA?
D75A??7@6;@9
57DF;8;53F;A@
A8
F:7

)
AD
D75A??7@6;@9
3BBDAH3>
A8
F:7
'DA<75F
;@
AD67D
FA
3>>AI
EF388
366;F;A@3>
F;?7
FA
366D7EE
F:7
5A@57D@E
D3;E76
:7D7;@
+:3@=
KAG
8AD
5A@E;67D;@9
AGD
5A??7@FE
3@6
B>73E7
;@5>G67
F:;E
>7FF7D
;@
F:7
D75AD6
A8
BDA5776;@9E
8AD
F:;E
BDA<75F
*;@57D7>K

?3>;3
AI>7K

G7@F7E

#AL73G
DGDK
##'

EXHIBITA

1-22
1-23
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Matt Hagemann, P.G, C.Hg.
(949) 887-9013
[email protected]
Paul E. Rosenfeld, PhD
(310) 795-2335
[email protected]
May 9, 2022
Amalia Bowley Fuentes
Lozeau | Drury LLP
1939 Harrison Street, Suite 150
Oakland, CA 94618
Subject: Comments on the Alexan Mixed-Use Development Project (SHC No. 2021070271) Dear Ms. Fuentes,
We have reviewed the February 2022 Draft Environmental Impact Report (“DEIR”) for the Alexan Mixed- Use Development Project (“Project”) located in the City of Arcadia (“City”). The Project proposes to demolish 17,324-square-feet (“SF”) of existing buildings, construct a 258,341-SF residential building with 319 units and 551 parking spaces, renovate the existing 75,133-SF of office space, and retain the existing 6,534-SF bank all on the 2.95-acre site.

Our review concludes that the DEIR fails to adequately evaluate the Project’s hazards and hazardous materials, air quality, health risk, and greenhouse gas impacts. As a result, emissions and health risk impacts associated with construction and operation of the proposed Project are underestimated and inadequately addressed. An updated EIR should be prepared to adequately assess and mitigate the potential hazards and hazardous materials, air quality, health risk, and greenhouse gas impacts that the project may have on the environment.

Hazards and Hazardous Materials

ƒ†‡“—ƒ–‡‹•
Ž‘•—”‡–‘ƒŽ›•‹•ƒ†
’ƒ
–•
The DEIR identifies subsurface soil and soil vapor contamination at the Project site that resulted from the operation of a former industrial laundry/dry cleaning facility from 1949 to 1966. The former use of the Site as an industrial laundry facility was identified as a recognized environmental condition and a potential vapor encroachment condition in a 2021 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, provided as Appendix F-1 to the DEIR. In response to these findings, a soil and soil vapor investigation was completed in 2021, provided as Appendix F-4 to the DEIR. The soil and soil vapor investigation identified

1-23
Cont.
1-24
2 concentrations of perchloroethylene (“PCE”) in soil vapor above residential and commercial/industrial screening levels.

The DEIR incorporates mitigation to address the soil vapor contamination, as excerpted below:

Mitigation Measure (“MM”) HAZ-2 Contaminated Soil Management:
“shall prepare a soil management plan (SMP) that outlines the proper screening, handling, characterization, transportation, and disposal procedures for contaminated soils on site.”
MM-HAZ-3 Vapor Mitigation:
“shall incorporate vapor mitigation design features into building plans that reduce potential vapor intrusion … Vapor mitigation systems must be reviewed and approved by the permitting agency(ies) (City of Arcadia, County of Los Angeles) prior to construction and prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy … indoor air monitoring will occur semiannually for one year to verify implemented measures are functioning properly and adequately mitigating vapor intrusion to below residential DTSC Screening Levels. ”
The mitigation is inadequate to evaluate contamination at the site. Further assessment of the soil and soil vapor contamination is necessary to identify and disclose the source of the contamination and the lateral and vertical extent of the contamination, both of which are unknown and are unaddressed by MM-HAZ-2 and MM-HAZ-3.

PCE is a likely human carcinogen, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“U.S. EPA”).1 Identifying the source of the PCE contamination is especially important due to the potential of encountering the source during subsurface excavation necessary for construction. The DEIR states only that the “likely source of soil vapor contamination on the Project site is beneath the existing northwestern building (the site of former laundry facilities), and would not likely be exacerbated or disturbed during construction activities” (p. 4.7-21). Because of the DEIR’s admitted uncertainty about the location of the source, which could be an unidentified underground sump or tank containing dry cleaning solvents such as PCE, existing contamination at the Project site could be exacerbated during excavation despite the DEIR’s assertion to the contrary.

To ensure the adequate assessment of the contamination, the California Department of Toxics Substances Control should be engaged under the voluntary cleanup program to oversee further investigations. With regulatory oversight, the source and extent of the contamination can be reliably investigated and disclosed in an updated EIR along with any mitigation that is necessary. 1 https://wwwn.cdc.gov/TSP/ToxFAQs/ToxFAQsDetails.aspx?faqid=264&toxid=48

1-25
3 Air Quality
•—„•–ƒ–‹ƒ–‡†
’—–ƒ”ƒ‡–‡”••‡†–‘•–‹ƒ–‡”‘Œ‡
–‹••‹‘•
The air quality analysis provided in the DEIR relies on emissions calculated with California Emissions Estimator Model (“CalEEMod”) Version 2020.4.0 (p. 4.2-1).2 CalEEMod provides recommended default values based on site-specific information, such as land use type, meteorological data, total lot acreage, project type and typical equipment associated with project type. If more specific project information is known, the user can change the default values and input project-specific values, but the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) requires that such changes be justified by substantial evidence.

Once all of the values are inputted into the model, the Project's construction and operational emissions are calculated, and "output files" are generated. These output files disclose to the reader what parameters are utilized in calculating the Project's air pollutant emissions and make known which default values are changed as well as provide justification for the values selected.

When reviewing the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) Outputs (“CalEEMod Outputs”), provided as Appendix C-1 to the DEIR, we found that the following model input is not consistent with information disclosed in the DEIR. As a result, the Project’s construction and operational emissions are underestimated. An updated EIR should be prepared to include an updated air quality analysis that adequately evaluates the impacts that construction and operation of the Project will have on local and regional air quality.

Incorrect Application of Operational Mitigation Measures Review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the “Alexan Arcadia EIR no Mitigation” and “Alexan Arcadia EIR no Mitigation LST” models include the following energy-related mitigation measure (see excerpt below) (Appendix C-1, pp. 30, 72, 106, 142, 185, 220).

As previously mentioned, the CalEEMod User’s Guide requires any changes to model defaults be justified.3 According to the “User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data” table, the justification provided for this inclusion is:
“Applicant provided information for onsite solar energy” (Appendix C-1, pp. 4, 46, 80, 115, 158, 193).

Furthermore, the DEIR states:
2 “CalEEMod Version 2020.4.0.” California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/download-model.
3 CalEEMod User’s Guide Version 2020.4.0.” California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at: https://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p. 1, 14.

1-27
1-25
Cont.
1-26
4 “In addition, the proposed project will include 100kW solar system onsite which was included in the CalEEMod analysis” (p. 4.6-23).

Finally, the DEIR states:
“The roof would also support mechanical equipment and provide several solar-ready zones for solar panels, the locations of which are depicted in Figure 3-3d” (p. 3-4).

However, these justifications are insufficient for three reasons.

First, the DEIR fails to mention the inclusion of an on-site solar system other than in the context of the CalEEMod analysis. Thus, as the DEIR’s Project Description does not disclose the intention of including an on-site solar system, we cannot guarantee that solar panels are actually part of the Project design.

Until the DEIR provides additional informational regarding the on-site solar system, we cannot verify the inclusion of the above-mentioned mitigation measure.

Second, simply because the roofs would be solar-ready does not indicate that the Project would actually incorporate solar panels.

Third, according to the AEP CEQA Portal Topic Paper on Mitigation Measures:
“While not ‘mitigation’, a good practice is to include those project design feature(s) that address environmental impacts in the mitigation monitoring and reporting program (MMRP). Often the MMRP is all that accompanies building and construction plans through the permit process. If the design features are not listed as important to addressing an environmental impact, it is easy for someone not involved in the original environmental process to approve a change to the project that could eliminate one or more of the design features without understanding the resulting environmental impact.”4
As demonstrated above, design features are not mitigation measures and may be eliminated from the Project’s design. Thus, until the inclusion of an on-site solar system is formally included as a mitigation measure, we cannot guarantee that it would be implemented, monitored, and enforced on the Project site. As a result, the inclusion of the energy-related operational mitigation measure in the model is incorrect. By including an operational mitigation measure without properly committing to its implementation, the model underestimates the Project’s operational emissions and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance.
‹‡•‡Žƒ”–‹
—Žƒ–‡ƒ––‡”
‡ƒŽ–Š‹•‹••‹‘•
ƒ†‡“—ƒ–‡Ž›˜ƒŽ—ƒ–‡†
The DEIR conducts a health risk assessment (“HRA”) evaluating the impacts from exposure to diesel particulate matter (“DPM”) emissions emitted from heavy-duty equipment and trucks during construction activities. Specifically, the DEIR estimates that the maximum unmitigated cancer risk posed to nearby, existing sensitive receptors as a result of Project construction would be 9.52 in one million, 4 “CEQA Portal Topic Paper Mitigation Measures.” AEP, February 2020, available at:
https://ceqaportal.org/tp/CEQA%20Mitigation%202020.pdf, p. 6.

1-28
1-27
Cont.
5 which would not exceed the SCAQMD significance threshold of 10 in one million (p. 4.2-33, Table 4.2- 12).

However, the DEIR fails to mention or evaluate the toxic air contaminant (“TAC”) emissions associated with Project operation. As such, the DEIR’s evaluation of the Project’s potential health risk impacts, as well as the subsequent less-than-significant impact conclusion, is incorrect for four reasons.

First, the DEIR’s construction-related HRA is unsubstantiated, as the DEIR fails to provide the input parameters and modeling assumptions. According to the DEIR:
“The dispersion modeling of DPM was performed using the AERMOD, which is the model SCAQMD requires for atmospheric dispersion of emissions […] Principal parameters of this modeling are presented in Table 4.2-8” (p. 4.2-25).

However, upon review of Table 4.2-8, we found that the HRA’s exposure parameters, such as the daily breathing rates (“BR/BW”), exposure duration (“ED”), age sensitivity factors (“ASF”), fraction of time at home (“FAH”), and exposure frequency (“EF”) were not disclosed. Furthermore, the Project’s AERMOD output files, provided in the Health Risk Assessment as Appendix C-2 to the DEIR, also fail to include any input parameters. As such, we cannot verify the calculation of the Project’s construction-related cancer risk is accurate.

Second, by failing to prepare a quantified operational HRA, the Project is inconsistent with CEQA’s requirement to correlate make “a reasonable effort to substantively connect a project’s air quality impacts to likely health consequences.”
5 According to the Transportation Technical Memorandum, provided as Appendix K-2 to the DEIR, operation of the Project is anticipated to generate 1,424 daily vehicle trips, which would generate additional exhaust emissions and continue to expose nearby sensitive receptors to DPM emissions (p. 12). However, the DEIR fails to evaluate the TAC emissions associated with Project operation or indicate the concentrations at which such pollutants would trigger adverse health effects. Thus, without making a reasonable effort to connect the Project’s operational TAC emissions to the potential health risks posed to nearby receptors, the Project is inconsistent with CEQA’s requirement to correlate the Project-generated emissions with potential adverse impacts on human health.
5 “Sierra Club v. County of Fresno.” Supreme Court of California, December 2018, available at:
https://ceqaportal.org/decisions/1907/Sierra%20Club%20v.%20County%20of%20Fresno.pdf.

1-29
1-30
1-31
6 Third, the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (“OEHHA”), the organization responsible for providing guidance on conducting HRAs in California, released its most recent Risk Assessment Guidelines: Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments in February 2015, as referenced by the DEIR (p. 4.2-33). This guidance document describes the types of projects that warrant the preparation of an HRA. Specifically, OEHHA recommends that all short-term projects lasting at least 2 months assess cancer risks.6 Furthermore, according to OEHHA:
“Exposure from projects lasting more than 6 months should be evaluated for the duration of the project. In all cases, for assessing risk to residential receptors, the exposure should be assumed to start in the third trimester to allow for the use of the ASFs (OEHHA, 2009).”7 OEHHA also recommends that an exposure duration of 30 years should be used to estimate the individual cancer risk at the maximally exposed individual resident (“MEIR”).8 While the DEIR fails to provide the expected lifetime of the proposed Project, we can reasonably assume that the Project would operate for at least 30 years, if not more. Thus, operation of the Project exceeds the 2-month and 6- month requirements set forth by OEHHA and should be evaluated for the entire 30-year residential exposure duration, as indicated by OEHHA guidance. These recommendations reflect the most recent state health risk policies, and as such, an EIR should be prepared to include an analysis of health risk impacts posed to nearby sensitive receptors from Project-generated DPM emissions.

Fourth, while the DEIR includes an HRA evaluating the Project’s health risk impacts to nearby, existing receptors as a result of Project construction, the HRA fails to evaluate the combined lifetime cancer risk as a result of Project construction and operation together. According to OEHHA guidance, “the excess cancer risk is calculated separately for each age grouping and then summed to yield cancer risk at the receptor location.”9 However, the DEIR’s HRA fails to sum each age bin to evaluate the combined cancer risk over the course of the Project’s total construction and operation. This is incorrect and thus, an updated analysis should quantify and sum the Project’s construction and operational health risks to compare to the SCAQMD threshold of 10 in one million.
10 
”‡‡‹‰Ǧ‡˜‡ŽƒŽ›•‹•‡‘•–”ƒ–‡•‹‰‹ˆ‹
ƒ–
’ƒ
–•
In order to conduct our screening-level risk assessment we relied upon AERSCREEN, which is a screening level air quality dispersion model.11 The model replaced SCREEN3, and AERSCREEN is included in the 6 “Risk Assessment Guidelines: Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf, p. 8-18. 7 “Risk Assessment Guidelines: Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf, p. 8-18. 8 “Risk Assessment Guidelines: Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf, p. 2-4. 9 “Guidance Manual for preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at:
https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf p. 8-4 10 “South Coast AQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds.” SCAQMD, April 2019, available at:
http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/scaqmd-air-quality-significance-thresholds.pdf. 11 “AERSCREEN Released as the EPA Recommended Screening Model,” U.S. EPA, April 2011, available at:
http://www.epa.gov/ttn/scram/guidance/clarification/20110411_AERSCREEN_Release_Memo.pdf

1-31
Cont.
7 OEHHA and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Associated (“CAPCOA”) guidance as the appropriate air dispersion model for Level 2 health risk screening assessments (“HRSAs”).12, 13 A Level 2 HRSA utilizes a limited amount of site-specific information to generate maximum reasonable downwind concentrations of air contaminants to which nearby sensitive receptors may be exposed. If an unacceptable air quality hazard is determined to be possible using AERSCREEN, a more refined modeling approach is required prior to approval of the Project.

We prepared a preliminary HRA of the Project’s operational health risk impact to nearby sensitive receptors using the Project’s annual PM10 exhaust estimates from the DEIR’s CalEEMod output files.

Consistent with recommendations set forth by OEHHA, we assumed residential exposure begins during the third trimester stage of life. Subtracting the 781-day construction period from the total residential duration of 30 years, we assumed that after Project construction, the sensitive receptor would be exposed to the Project’s operational DPM for an additional 27.86 years. The DEIR’s annual CalEEMod output file indicates that operational activities will generate approximately 99 net pounds of DPM per year throughout operation.
14, 15 The AERSCREEN model relies on a continuous average emission rate to simulate maximum downward concentrations from point, area, and volume emission sources. To account for the variability in equipment usage and truck trips over Project operation, we calculated an average DPM emission rate by the following equation:
ݏ݉ܽݎ݃
݀݊݋ܿ݁ݏݏܾ݈
ݏݕܽ݀ݏ݉ܽݎ݃
ݏܾ݈ݕܽ݀
ݏݎݑ݋݄ݎݑ݋݄
ݏ݀݊݋ܿ݁ݏ࢙
Using this equation, we estimated an operational emission rate of 0.000142 g/s. Construction and operational activity was simulated as a 2.95-acre rectangular area source in AERSCREEN with approximate dimensions of 155- by 77-meters. A release height of three meters was selected to represent the height of exhaust stacks on operational equipment and other heavy-duty vehicles, and an initial vertical dimension of one and a half meters was used to simulate instantaneous plume dispersion upon release. An urban meteorological setting was selected with model-default inputs for wind speed and direction distribution. The population of Arcadia was obtained from U.S. 2020 Census data.16 The AERSCREEN model generates maximum reasonable estimates of single-hour DPM concentrations from the Project Site. United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) guidance suggests that in screening procedures, the annualized average concentration of an air pollutant to be estimated by multiplying the single-hour concentration by 10%.17 According to the DEIR, the nearest sensitive receptors are residences located approximately 650 feet, or approximately 200 meters, to the south of 12 “Risk Assessment Guidelines: Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf. 13 “Health Risk Assessments for Proposed Land Use Projects.” CAPCOA, July 2009, available at:
http://www.capcoa.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/CAPCOA_HRA_LU_Guidelines_8-6-09.pdf. 14 See Attachment A for calculations.
15 Existing emissions subtracted from operational emissions. 16 “Arcadia.” U.S. Census Bureau, 2020, available at: https://datacommons.org/place/geoId/0602462. 17 “Screening Procedures for Estimating the Air Quality Impact of Stationary Sources Revised.” U.S. EPA, October 1992, available at: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/scram/guidance/guide/EPA-454R-92-019_OCR.pdf.

1-31
Cont.
8 the Project site (p. 4.2-31). Thus, the single-hour concentration estimated by AERSCREEN for Project construction is approximately 1.017 μg/m3 DPM at approximately 200 meters downwind. Multiplying this single-hour concentration by 10%, we get an annualized average concentration of 0.1017 μg/m3 for Project operation at the maximally exposed individual resident (“MEIR”).

We calculated the excess cancer risk to the MEIR using applicable HRA methodologies prescribed by OEHHA, as recommended by SCAQMD.18 Guidance from OEHHA and the California Air Resources Board (“CARB”) recommends the use of a standard point estimate approach, including high-point estimate (i.e. 95th percentile) breathing rates and age sensitivity factors (“ASF”), in order to account for the increased sensitivity to carcinogens during early-in-life exposure and accurately assess risk for susceptible subpopulations such as children. The residential exposure parameters utilized for the various age groups in our screening-level HRA are as follows:

Exposure Assumptions for Residential Individual Cancer Risk Age Group
Breathing
Rate
(L/kg-day)19
Age
Sensitivity
Factor20
Exposure
Duration
(years)
Fraction of
Time at
Home21
Exposure
Frequency
(days/year)22
Exposure
Time
(hours/day)
3rd Trimester 361 10 0.25 1 350 24
Infant (0 – 2) 1090 10 2 1 350 24
Child (2 – 16) 572 3 14 1 350 24
Adult (16 – 30) 261 1 14 0.73 350 24
For the inhalation pathway, the procedure requires the incorporation of several discrete variates to effectively quantify dose for each age group. Once determined, contaminant dose is multiplied by the cancer potency factor (“CPF”) in units of inverse dose expressed in milligrams per kilogram per day 18 “AB 2588 and Rule 1402 Supplemental Guidelines.” SCAQMD, October 2020, available at:
http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/planning/risk-assessment/ab-2588-supplemental- guidelines.pdf?sfvrsn=19, p. 2.
19 “Supplemental Guidelines for Preparing Risk Assessments for the Air Toxics ‘Hot Spots’ Information and Assessment Act.” SCAQMD, October 2020, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/planning/risk- assessment/ab-2588-supplemental-guidelines.pdf?sfvrsn=19, p. 19; see also “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at:
https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf. 20 “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf, p. 8-5 Table 8.3. 21 “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf, p. 5-24. 22 “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf, p. 5-24.

1-31
Cont.
9 (mg/kg/day-1) to derive the cancer risk estimate. Therefore, to assess exposures, we utilized the following dose algorithm:
ܴܤ
ܹܤܨܥ
where:

DoseAIR = dose by inhalation (mg/kg/day), per age group Cair сĐŽŶĐĞŶƚƌĂƚŝŽŶŽĨĐŽŶƚĂŵŝŶĂŶƚŝŶĂŝƌ;ʅŐͬŵϯͿ
EF = exposure frequency (number of days/365 days)
BR/BW = daily breathing rate normalized to body weight (L/kg/day) A = inhalation absorption factor (default = 1)
CF = conversion factor (1x10-ϲ͕ʅŐƚŽŵŐ͕>ƚŽŵϯͿ
To calculate the overall cancer risk, we used the following equation for each appropriate age group:
ܦܧ
ܶܣ
where:

DoseAIR = dose by inhalation (mg/kg/day), per age group CPF = cancer potency factor, chemical-specific (mg/kg/day)-1 ASF = age sensitivity factor, per age group
FAH = fraction of time at home, per age group (for residential receptors only) ED = exposure duration (years)
AT = averaging time period over which exposure duration is averaged (always 70 years) Consistent with the 397-day construction schedule, the annualized averaged concentration for operation was used for the latter 0.11 years of the infant stage of life (0 – 2 years), as well as the entire child (2 – 16 years) and adult (16 – 30 years) stages of life. The results of our calculations are shown in the table below.

1-32
10 The Maximally Exposed Individual at an Existing Residential Receptor Age Group Emissions Source Duration (years) Concentration (ug/m3) Cancer Risk
3rd Trimester Construction 0.25 * *
Construction 1.89 * *
Operation 0.11 0.1017 1.84E-06
Infant (0 – 2) Total 2 1.84E-06
Child (2 – 16) Operation 14 0.1017 3.68E-05
Adult (16 – 30) Operation 14 0.1017 4.09E-06
Lifetime 30 4.275E-05
*Construction-related cancer risk calculated separately in the DEIR.

As demonstrated in the table above, the excess cancer risks to infants, children, and adults at the MEIR located approximately 200 meters away, over the course of Project operation, are approximately 1.84,

36.8, and 4.09 in one million, respectively. The excess cancer risk associated with the Project operation over the course of a residential lifetime is approximately 42.75 in one million. When summing the Project’s operational cancer risk, as estimated by SWAPE, with the DEIR’s construction-related cancer risk of 9.52 in one million, we estimate an excess cancer risk of approximately 52.27 in one million over the course of a residential lifetime (30 years) (p. 4.2-33, Table 4.2-12). 23 As such, the lifetime cancer risk
exceed the SCAQMD threshold of 10 in one million, thus resulting in a potentially significant impact not previously addressed or identified by the DEIR.

Our analysis represents a screening-level HRA, which is known to be conservative and tends to err on the side of health protection. The purpose of the screening-level HRA is to demonstrate the potential link between Project-generated emissions and adverse health risk impacts. According to the U.S. EPA:
“EPA’s Exposure Assessment Guidelines recommend completing exposure assessments iteratively using a tiered approach to ‘strike a balance between the costs of adding detail and refinement to an assessment and the benefits associated with that additional refinement’ (U.S.

EPA, 1992).

In other words, an assessment using basic tools (e.g., simple exposure calculations, default values, rules of thumb, conservative assumptions) can be conducted as the first phase (or tier) of the overall assessment (i.e., a screening-level assessment). 23 Calculated: 42.75 in one million + 9.52 in one million = 52.27 in one million.

1-32
Cont.
1-33
11 The exposure assessor or risk manager can then determine whether the results of the screening- level assessment warrant further evaluation through refinements of the input data and exposure assumptions or by using more advanced models.”24 As demonstrated above, screening-level analyses warrant further evaluation in a refined modeling approach. Thus, as our screening-level HRA demonstrates that construction and operation of the Project could result in a potentially significant health risk impact, an updated EIR should be prepared to include a refined health risk analysis which adequately and accurately evaluates health risk impacts associated with both Project construction and operation.

Greenhouse Gas
ƒ‹Ž—”‡–‘†‡“—ƒ–‡Ž›˜ƒŽ—ƒ–‡
”‡‡Š‘—•‡
ĥ
’ƒ
–•
The DEIR estimates that the Project would generate net annual greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions of 2,399.88 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents per year (“MT CO2e/year”), which would not exceed the SCAQMD bright-line threshold of 3,000 MT CO2e/year (p. 4.6-25 – 4.6-26, Table 4.6-3).

As such, the DEIR concludes:
24 “Exposure Assessment Tools by Tiers and Types - Screening-Level and Refined.” U.S. EPA, available at:
https://www.epa.gov/expobox/exposure-assessment-tools-tiers-and-types-screening-level-and-refined.

1-33
Cont.
1-34
1-35
12 “Even without taking into account the removal of the existing land uses, the proposed Project’s estimated emissions would be below the SCAQMD GHG threshold of 3,000 MT CO2e per year.

Therefore, the proposed Project would not generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment, and this would represent a cumulatively less than significant impact” (p. 4.6-26).

Furthermore, DEIR’s analysis relies upon the Project’s consistency with the SCAG 2020-2045 RTP/SCS and CARB Climate Change Scoping Plan in order to conclude a less-than-significant GHG impact (p. 4.6- 26 – 4.6-36). However, the DEIR’s analysis, as well as the subsequent less-than-significant impact conclusion, is incorrect for three reasons.

(1) The DEIR’s quantitative GHG analysis relies upon an incorrect and unsubstantiated air model; (2) The DEIR fails to consider the pe rformance-based standards under CARB’s Scoping Plan; and (3) The DEIR fails to consider the pe rformance-based standards under SCAG’s RTP/SCS. 1) Incorrect and Unsubstantiated Quantitative Analysis of Emissions As previously stated, the DEIR estimates that the Project would generate net annual GHG emissions of 2,399.88 MT CO2e/year (p. 4.6-25 – 4.6-26, Table 4.6-3). However, the DEIR’s quantitative GHG analysis is unsubstantiated. As previously discussed, upon review of the CalEEMod Outputs, provided as Appendix C-1 to the DEIR, we found that the energy-related mitigation measure inputted into the model is not consistent with information disclosed in the DEIR. As a result, the model underestimates the Project’s emissions, and the DEIR’s quantitative GHG analysis should not be relied upon to determine Project significance. An updated EIR should be prepared that adequately assesses the potential GHG impacts that construction and operation of the proposed Project may have on the surrounding environment.
2) Failure to Consider Performance-based Standards Under CARB’s 2017 Scoping Plan As previously discussed, the DEIR concludes that the Project would be consistent with CARB’s 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan (p. 4.6-26 – 4.6-36). However, this is incorrect, as the DEIR fails to consider performance-based measures proposed by CARB.
ŝ͘ WĂƐƐĞŶŐĞƌΘ>ŝŐŚƚƵƚLJsDdWĞƌĂƉŝƚĂĞŶĐŚŵĂƌŬƐƉĞƌ^ϯϳϱ In reaching the State’s long-term GHG emission reduction goals, CARB’s 2017 Scoping Plan explicitly cites to SB 375 and the VMT reductions anticipated under the implementation of Sustainable Community Strategies.25 CARB has identified the population and daily VMT from passenger autos and light-duty vehicles at the state and county level for each year between 2010 to 2050 under a “baseline scenario” that includes “current projections of VMT included in the existing Regional Transportation Plans/Sustainable Communities Strategies (RTP/SCSs) adopted by the State’s 18 Metropolitan Planning 25 “California’s 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan.” CARB, November 2017, available at:
https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/scoping_plan_2017.pdf, p. 25, 98, 101-103.

1-35
Cont.
1-36
13 Organizations (MPOs) pursuant to SB 375 as of 2015.”26 By dividing the projected daily VMT by the population, we calculated the daily VMT per capita for each year at the state and county level for 2010 (baseline year), 2026 (Project operational year), and 2030 (target years under SB 32) as shown in the table below.
2017 Scoping Plan Daily VMT Per Capita
Los Angeles County State
Year Population LDV VMT Baseline VMT Per Capita Population LDV VMT Baseline VMT Per Capita 2010 9,838,771 216,979,221.64 22.05 37,335,085 836,463,980.46 22.40 2026 10,714,109 206,028,472.00 19.23 42,655,695 935,625,476.00 21.93 2030 10,868,614 215,539,586.12 19.83 43,939,250 957,178,153.19 21.78 As the DEIR fails to evaluate the Project’s consistency with the CARB 2017 Scoping Plan performance- based daily VMT per capita projections, the DEIR’s claim that the proposed Project would not conflict with the CARB 2017 Scoping Plan is unsupported. An updated EIR should be prepared for the proposed Project to provide additional information and analysis to conclude less-than-significant GHG impacts. 3) Failure to Consider Performance-based Standards under SCAG’s RTP/SCS As previously discussed, the DEIR concludes that the Project would be consistent with SCAG’s RTP/SCS (p. 4.6-26 – 4.6-36). However, the DEIR fails to consider whether or not the Project meets any of the specific performance-based goals underlying SCAG’s RTP/SCS and SB 375, such as: i) per capita GHG emission targets, or ii) daily vehicles miles traveled (“VMT”) per capita benchmarks. ŝ͘ ^ϯϳϱWĞƌĂƉŝƚĂ','
ŵŝƐƐŝŽŶ'ŽĂůƐ
SB 375 was signed into law in September 2008 to enhance the state’s ability to reach AB 32 goals by directing CARB to develop regional 2020 and 2035 GHG emission reduction targets for passenger vehicles (autos and light-duty trucks). In March 2018, CARB adopted updated regional targets requiring a 19 percent decrease in VMT for the SCAG region by 2035. This goal is reflected in SCAG’s 2020 RTP/SCS Program Environmental Impact Report (“PEIR”), in which the 2020 RTP/SCS PEIR updates the per capita emissions to 18.8 lbs/day in 2035 (see excerpt below). 27 26 “Supporting Calculations for 2017 Scoping Plan-Identified VMT Reductions,” Excel Sheet “Readme.” CARB, January 2019, available at: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2019- 01/sp_mss_vmt_calculations_jan19_0.xlsx.
27 “Connect SoCal Certified Final Program Environmental Impact Report.” SCAG, May 2020, available at:
https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/file-attachments/fpeir_connectsocal_complete.pdf?1607981618, p. 3.8-74.

1-36
Cont.
1-37
1-38
14 As the DEIR fails to evaluate the Project’s consistency with the SCAG’s per capita emissions, the DEIR’s claim that the proposed Project would not conflict with SCAG’s RTP/SCS is unsupported. An updated EIR should be prepared for the proposed Project to provide additional information and analysis to conclude less-than-significant GHG impacts.
ŝŝ͘ ^ϯϳϱZdWͬ^^ĂŝůLJsDdWĞƌĂƉŝƚĂdĂƌŐĞƚ
Under the SCAG’s 2020 RTP/SCS, daily VMT per capita in the SCAG region should decrease from 23.2 VMT in 2016 to 20.7 VMT by 2045.28 Daily VMT per capita in Los Angeles County should decrease from

22.2 to 19.2 VMT during that same period.29 Here, however, the DEIR fails to consider any of the above- mentioned performance-based VMT targets. As the DEIR fails to evaluate the Project’s consistency with the SCAG’s performance-based daily VMT per capita projections, the DEIR’s claim that the proposed Project would not conflict with SCAG’s RTP/SCS is unsupported. An updated EIR should be prepared for the proposed Project to provide additional information and analysis to conclude less-than-significant GHG impacts.
‹•
Žƒ‹‡”
SWAPE has received limited discovery regarding this project. Additional information may become available in the future; thus, we retain the right to revise or amend this report when additional information becomes available. Our professional services have been performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable environmental consultants practicing in this or similar localities at the time of service. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the scope of work, work methodologies and protocols, site conditions, analytical testing results, and findings presented. This report reflects efforts which were limited to information that was reasonably accessible at the time of the work, and may contain informational gaps, inconsistencies, or 28 “Connect SoCal.” SCAG, September 2020, available at: https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/file- attachments/0903fconnectsocal-plan_0.pdf?1606001176, pp. 138. 29 “Connect SoCal.” SCAG, September 2020, available at: https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/file- attachments/0903fconnectsocal-plan_0.pdf?1606001176, pp. 138.

1-38
Cont.
15 otherwise be incomplete due to the unavailability or uncertainty of information obtained or provided by third parties.

Sincerely,
Matt Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D.

Attachment A: Health Risk Calculations
Attachment B: AERSCREEN Output Files
Attachment C: Matt Hagemann CV
Attachment D: Paul E. Rosenfeld CV

1-39
AnnualEmissions(tons/year) 0.04942
DailyEmissions(lbs/day) 0.270794521
TotalDPM(lbs) 98.84
EmissionRate(g/s) 0.001421671
ReleaseHeight(meters) 3
TotalAcreage 2.95
MaxHorizontal(meters) 154.52
MinHorizontal(meters) 77.26
InitialVerticalDimension(meters) 1.5
Setting Urban
Population 57,053
StartDate 6/22/2023
EndDate 8/11/2025
TotalConstructionDays 781
TotalYearsofConstruction 2.14
TotalYearsofOperation 27.86
KƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶ

ŵŝƐƐŝŽŶZĂƚĞ
ƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚ

1-39
Cont.

Startdateandtime05/06/2212:04:12
AERSCREEN21112
AlexanMixedŞUseOperation
AlexanMixedŞUseOperation
ŞŞŞŞŞŞŞŞŞŞŞŞŞŞŞŞŞDATAENTRYVALIDATIONŞŞŞŞŞŞŞŞŞŞŞŞŞŞŞŞŞ METRICENGLISH
**AREADATA**ŞŞŞŞŞŞŞŞŞŞŞŞŞŞŞŞŞŞŞŞŞŞŞŞŞŞŞŞŞŞŞ
EmissionRate:0.142EŞ02g/s 0.113E Ş01lb/hr
AreaHeight: 3.00 meters 9.84 feet
AreaSourceLength:154.52meters 506.96 feet
AreaSourceWidth:77.26meters 253.48 feet
VerticalDimension:1.50meters 4.92 feet
ModelMode: URBAN
Population: 57053
DisttoAmbientAir: 1.0 meters 3. feet
**BUILDINGDATA**
ƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚ

NoBuildingDownwashParameters
**TERRAINDATA**
NoTerrainElevations
SourceBaseElevation:0.0meters 0.0 feet
Probedistance:5000.meters 16404. feet
Noflagpolereceptors
Nodiscretereceptorsused
**FUMIGATIONDATA**
Nofumigationrequested
**METEOROLOGYDATA**
Min/MaxTemperature:250.0/310.0KŞ9.7/98.3DegF MinimumWindSpeed:0.5m/s
1-39
Cont.

AnemometerHeight:10.000meters
DominantSurfaceProfile:Urban
DominantClimateType:AverageMoisture
Surfacefrictionvelocity(u*):notadjusted
DEBUGOPTIONON
AERSCREENoutputfile:
2022.05.06_AlexanMixedUse_HRA_Calcs.out
***AERSCREENRunisReadytoBegin
Noterrainused,AERMAPwillnotberun
**************************************************
SURFACECHARACTERISTICS&MAKEMET
Obtainingsurfacecharacteristics...
1-39
Cont.

UsingAERMETseasonalsurfacecharacteristicsforUrbanwithAverageMoisture Season Albedo Bo zo
Winter 0.35 1.501.000
Spring 0.14 1.001.000
Summer 0.16 2.001.000
Autumn 0.18 2.001.000
Creatingmetfilesaerscreen_01_01.sfc&aerscreen_01_01.pfl Creatingmetfilesaerscreen_02_01.sfc&aerscreen_02_01.pfl Creatingmetfilesaerscreen_03_01.sfc&aerscreen_03_01.pfl Creatingmetfilesaerscreen_04_01.sfc&aerscreen_04_01.pfl Buildingsand/orterrainpresentorrectangularareasource,skippingprobe FLOWSECTORstarted05/06/2212:05:43
********************************************
RunningAERMOD
ProcessingWinter
Processingsurfaceroughnesssector1
1-39
Cont.

*****************************************************
Processingwindflowsector1
AERMODFinishesSuccessfullyforFLOWSECTORstage2Wintersector0 ********WARNINGMESSAGES********
***NONE***
*****************************************************
Processingwindflowsector2
AERMODFinishesSuccessfullyforFLOWSECTORstage2Wintersector5 ********WARNINGMESSAGES********
***NONE***
*****************************************************
Processingwindflowsector3
AERMODFinishesSuccessfullyforFLOWSECTORstage2Wintersector10 ********WARNINGMESSAGES********
***NONE***
1-39
Cont.

*****************************************************
Processingwindflowsector4
AERMODFinishesSuccessfullyforFLOWSECTORstage2Wintersector15 ********WARNINGMESSAGES********
***NONE***
*****************************************************
Processingwindflowsector5
AERMODFinishesSuccessfullyforFLOWSECTORstage2Wintersector20 ********WARNINGMESSAGES********
***NONE***
*****************************************************
Processingwindflowsector6
AERMODFinishesSuccessfullyforFLOWSECTORstage2Wintersector25 ********WARNINGMESSAGES********
***NONE***
*****************************************************
1-39
Cont.

Processingwindflowsector7
AERMODFinishesSuccessfullyforFLOWSECTORstage2Wintersector30 ********WARNINGMESSAGES********
***NONE***
********************************************
RunningAERMOD
ProcessingSpring
Processingsurfaceroughnesssector1
*****************************************************
Processingwindflowsector1
AERMODFinishesSuccessfullyforFLOWSECTORstage2Springsector0 ********WARNINGMESSAGES********
***NONE***
*****************************************************
Processingwindflowsector2
AERMODFinishesSuccessfullyforFLOWSECTORstage2Springsector5 1-39
Cont.

********WARNINGMESSAGES********
***NONE***
*****************************************************
Processingwindflowsector3
AERMODFinishesSuccessfullyforFLOWSECTORstage2Springsector10 ********WARNINGMESSAGES********
***NONE***
*****************************************************
Processingwindflowsector4
AERMODFinishesSuccessfullyforFLOWSECTORstage2Springsector15 ********WARNINGMESSAGES********
***NONE***
*****************************************************
Processingwindflowsector5
AERMODFinishesSuccessfullyforFLOWSECTORstage2Springsector20 1-39
Cont.

********WARNINGMESSAGES********
***NONE***
*****************************************************
Processingwindflowsector6
AERMODFinishesSuccessfullyforFLOWSECTORstage2Springsector25 ********WARNINGMESSAGES********
***NONE***
*****************************************************
Processingwindflowsector7
AERMODFinishesSuccessfullyforFLOWSECTORstage2Springsector30 ********WARNINGMESSAGES********
***NONE***
********************************************
RunningAERMOD
ProcessingSummer
Processingsurfaceroughnesssector1
1-39
Cont.

*****************************************************
Processingwindflowsector1
AERMODFinishesSuccessfullyforFLOWSECTORstage2Summersector0 ********WARNINGMESSAGES********
***NONE***
*****************************************************
Processingwindflowsector2
AERMODFinishesSuccessfullyforFLOWSECTORstage2Summersector5 ********WARNINGMESSAGES********
***NONE***
*****************************************************
Processingwindflowsector3
AERMODFinishesSuccessfullyforFLOWSECTORstage2Summersector10 ********WARNINGMESSAGES********
***NONE***
*****************************************************
1-39
Cont.

Processingwindflowsector4
AERMODFinishesSuccessfullyforFLOWSECTORstage2Summersector15 ********WARNINGMESSAGES********
***NONE***
*****************************************************
Processingwindflowsector5
AERMODFinishesSuccessfullyforFLOWSECTORstage2Summersector20 ********WARNINGMESSAGES********
***NONE***
*****************************************************
Processingwindflowsector6
AERMODFinishesSuccessfullyforFLOWSECTORstage2Summersector25 ********WARNINGMESSAGES********
***NONE***
*****************************************************
Processingwindflowsector7
1-39
Cont.

AERMODFinishesSuccessfullyforFLOWSECTORstage2Summersector30 ********WARNINGMESSAGES********
***NONE***
********************************************
RunningAERMOD
ProcessingAutumn
Processingsurfaceroughnesssector1
*****************************************************
Processingwindflowsector1
AERMODFinishesSuccessfullyforFLOWSECTORstage2Autumnsector0 ********WARNINGMESSAGES********
***NONE***
*****************************************************
Processingwindflowsector2
AERMODFinishesSuccessfullyforFLOWSECTORstage2Autumnsector5 1-39
Cont.

********WARNINGMESSAGES********
***NONE***
*****************************************************
Processingwindflowsector3
AERMODFinishesSuccessfullyforFLOWSECTORstage2Autumnsector10 ********WARNINGMESSAGES********
***NONE***
*****************************************************
Processingwindflowsector4
AERMODFinishesSuccessfullyforFLOWSECTORstage2Autumnsector15 ********WARNINGMESSAGES********
***NONE***
*****************************************************
Processingwindflowsector5
AERMODFinishesSuccessfullyforFLOWSECTORstage2Autumnsector20 ********WARNINGMESSAGES********
1-39
Cont.

***NONE***
*****************************************************
Processingwindflowsector6
AERMODFinishesSuccessfullyforFLOWSECTORstage2Autumnsector25 ********WARNINGMESSAGES********
***NONE***
*****************************************************
Processingwindflowsector7
AERMODFinishesSuccessfullyforFLOWSECTORstage2Autumnsector30 ********WARNINGMESSAGES********
***NONE***
FLOWSECTORended05/06/2212:05:53
REFINE started 05/06/2212:05:53
AERMODFinishesSuccessfullyforREFINEstage3Wintersector0 ********WARNINGMESSAGES********
1-39
Cont.

***NONE***
REFINE ended 05/06/2212:05:54
**********************************************
AERSCREENFinishedSuccessfully
Withnoerrorsorwarnings
Checklogfilefordetails
***********************************************
Endingdateandtime05/06/2212:05:56
1-39
Cont.

ConcentrationDistanceElevationDiagSeason/MonthZosector Date  H0U*W*DT/DZZICNVZIMCHMŞOLENZ0BOWENALBEDOREFWSHT REFTAHT
0.27221E+01 1.00 0.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.30775E+01 25.00 0.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.33604E+01 50.00 0.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.35900E+01 75.00 0.0010.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
* 0.36231E+01 79.00 0.0010.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.26739E+01 100.00 0.0020.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.18865E+01 125.00 0.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.14869E+01 150.00 0.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.12134E+01 175.00 0.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.10168E+01 200.00 0.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.86877E+00 225.00 0.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.75510E+00 250.00 0.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.66417E+00 275.00 0.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.59106E+00 300.00 0.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.53100E+00 325.00 0.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.48049E+00 350.00 0.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 1-39
Cont.

310.02.0
0.43780E+00 375.00 0.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.40158E+00 400.00 0.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.37011E+00 425.00 0.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.34247E+00 450.00 0.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.31833E+00 475.00 0.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.29708E+00 500.00 0.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.27817E+00 525.00 0.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.26116E+00 550.00 0.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.24594E+00 575.00 0.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.23222E+00 600.00 0.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.21972E+00 625.00 0.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.20835E+00 650.00 0.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.19799E+00 675.00 0.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.18847E+00 700.00 0.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.17965E+00 725.00 0.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.17154E+00 750.00 0.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.16406E+00 775.00 0.005.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 1-39
Cont.

Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.15713E+00 800.00 0.005.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.15069E+00 825.00 0.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.14471E+00 850.00 0.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.13913E+00 875.00 0.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.13392E+00 900.00 0.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.12905E+00 925.00 0.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.12446E+00 950.00 0.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.12014E+00 975.00 0.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.11608E+001000.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.11225E+001025.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.10862E+001050.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.10518E+001075.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.10193E+001100.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.98853EŞ011125.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.95939EŞ011150.000.005.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.93169EŞ011175.000.005.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
1-39
Cont.

0.90534EŞ011200.000.005.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.88027EŞ011225.000.005.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.85638EŞ011250.000.005.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.83360EŞ011275.000.005.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.81187EŞ011300.000.005.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.79109EŞ011325.000.005.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999. 21. 6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.77124EŞ011350.000.005.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999. 21. 6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.75224EŞ011375.000.005.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999. 21. 6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.73404EŞ011400.000.005.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.71660EŞ011425.000.005.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.70531EŞ011450.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.68897EŞ011475.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.67327EŞ011500.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.65818EŞ011525.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.64367EŞ011550.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.62971EŞ011575.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.61626EŞ011600.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 1-39
Cont.

310.02.0
0.60330EŞ011625.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.59080EŞ011650.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.57875EŞ011675.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.56712EŞ011700.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.55588EŞ011725.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.54503EŞ011750.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999. 21. 6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.53454EŞ011775.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999. 21. 6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.52439EŞ011800.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999. 21. 6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.51457EŞ011825.000.000.0 Winter 0Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.50507EŞ011850.000.0010.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.49586EŞ011875.000.0010.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.48694EŞ011900.000.0010.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.47830EŞ011924.990.0010.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.46992EŞ011950.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999. 21. 6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.46179EŞ011975.000.005.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999. 21. 6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.45390EŞ012000.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999. 21. 6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.44624EŞ012025.000.005.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 1-39
Cont.

Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.43880EŞ012050.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.43158EŞ012075.000.005.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.42456EŞ012100.000.0015.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.41773EŞ012125.000.005.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.41109EŞ012150.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.40463EŞ012175.000.005.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.39835EŞ012200.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.39223EŞ012224.990.0015.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.38628EŞ012250.000.0015.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.38047EŞ012275.000.005.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.37482EŞ012300.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.36931EŞ012325.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.36394EŞ012350.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.35871EŞ012375.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999. 21. 6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.35360EŞ012400.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999. 21. 6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.34862EŞ012425.000.0020.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999. 21. 6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
1-39
Cont.

0.34376EŞ012449.990.0025.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.33901EŞ012475.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.33438EŞ012500.000.0015.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.32986EŞ012525.000.005.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.32544EŞ012550.000.0030.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.32112EŞ012575.000.0025.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999. 21. 6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.31690EŞ012600.000.0020.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999. 21. 6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.31277EŞ012625.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999. 21. 6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.30874EŞ012650.000.0015.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.30480EŞ012675.000.0025.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.30094EŞ012700.000.0020.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.29717EŞ012725.000.0020.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.29348EŞ012750.000.0010.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.28986EŞ012775.000.0010.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.28633EŞ012800.000.0010.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999. 21. 6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.28286EŞ012825.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999. 21. 6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.27947EŞ012850.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999. 21. 6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 1-39
Cont.

310.02.0
0.27615EŞ012875.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.27290EŞ012900.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.26971EŞ012925.000.0030.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.26659EŞ012950.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.26353EŞ012975.000.0010.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.26052EŞ013000.000.005.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999. 21. 6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.25758EŞ013025.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999. 21. 6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.25470EŞ013050.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999. 21. 6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.25187EŞ013074.990.0020.0 Winter 0Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.24909EŞ013100.000.005.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.24637EŞ013125.000.0010.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.24370EŞ013150.000.005.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.24107EŞ013175.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.23850EŞ013200.000.005.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999. 21. 6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.23597EŞ013225.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999. 21. 6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.23349EŞ013250.000.005.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999. 21. 6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.23106EŞ013275.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 1-39
Cont.

Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.22867EŞ013300.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.22632EŞ013325.000.0015.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.22401EŞ013350.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.22174EŞ013375.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.21951EŞ013400.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.21732EŞ013425.000.0025.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.21517EŞ013450.000.0015.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.21306EŞ013475.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.21098EŞ013500.000.0020.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.20893EŞ013525.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.20692EŞ013550.000.0025.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.20494EŞ013575.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.20300EŞ013600.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.20109EŞ013625.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999. 21. 6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.19920EŞ013650.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999. 21. 6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.19735EŞ013675.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999. 21. 6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
1-39
Cont.

0.19553EŞ013700.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.19374EŞ013725.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.19197EŞ013750.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.19024EŞ013775.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.18853EŞ013800.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.18684EŞ013825.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999. 21. 6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.18518EŞ013850.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999. 21. 6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.18355EŞ013875.000.005.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999. 21. 6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.18194EŞ013900.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.18036EŞ013925.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.17880EŞ013950.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.17726EŞ013975.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.17575EŞ014000.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.17426EŞ014025.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.17279EŞ014050.000.0030.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.17134EŞ014075.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.16991EŞ014100.000.0025.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 1-39
Cont.

310.02.0
0.16850EŞ014125.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.16712EŞ014150.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.16575EŞ014175.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.16440EŞ014200.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.16307EŞ014225.000.005.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.16176EŞ014250.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999. 21. 6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.16047EŞ014275.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999. 21. 6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.15919EŞ014300.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999. 21. 6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.15794EŞ014325.000.000.0 Winter 0Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.15670EŞ014350.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.15547EŞ014375.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.15427EŞ014400.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.15308EŞ014425.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.15190EŞ014450.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999. 21. 6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.15074EŞ014475.000.005.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999. 21. 6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.14960EŞ014500.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999. 21. 6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.14847EŞ014525.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 1-39
Cont.

Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.14735EŞ014550.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.14625EŞ014575.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.14517EŞ014600.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.14409EŞ014625.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.14303EŞ014650.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.14199EŞ014675.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.14096EŞ014700.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.13994EŞ014725.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.13893EŞ014750.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.13794EŞ014775.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.13696EŞ014800.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.13599EŞ014825.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.13503EŞ014850.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.13408EŞ014875.000.0025.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999. 21. 6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.13315EŞ014900.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999. 21. 6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.13222EŞ014925.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999. 21. 6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
1-39
Cont.

0.13131EŞ014950.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.13041EŞ014975.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
0.12952EŞ015000.000.000.0 Winter 0 Ş36010011001 Ş1.300.043Ş9.0000.020Ş999.21.6.01.0001.500.350.5010.0 310.02.0
1-39
Cont.

1-40
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Matt Hagemann, P.G, C.Hg.
(949) 887-9013
[email protected]
Matthew F. Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg., QSD, QSP
Geologic and Hydrogeologic Characterization
Investigation and Remediation Strategies
Litigation Support and Testifying Expert
Industrial Stormwater Compliance
CEQA Review
Education:

M.S. Degree, Geology, California State University Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 1984.

B.A. Degree, Geology, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA, 1982.

Professional Certifications:

California Professional Geologist
California Certified Hydrogeologist
Qualified SWPPP Developer and Practitioner
Professional Experience:

Matt has 30 years of experience in environmental policy, contaminant assessment and remediation, stormwater compliance, and CEQA review. He spent nine years with the U.S. EPA in the RCRA and Superfund programs and served as EPA’s Senior Science Policy Advisor in the Western Regional Office where he identified emerging threats to groundwater from perchlorate and MTBE. While with EPA, Matt also served as a Senior Hydrogeologist in the oversight of the assessment of seven major military facilities undergoing base closure. He led numerous enforcement actions under provisions of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and directed efforts to improve hydrogeologic characterization and water quality monitoring. For the past 15 years, as a founding partner with SWAPE, Matt has developed extensive client relationships and has managed complex projects that include consultation as an expert witness and a regulatory specialist, and a manager of projects ranging from industrial stormwater compliance to CEQA review of impacts from hazardous waste, air quality and greenhouse gas emissions.

Positions Matt has held include:
x Founding Partner, Soil/Water/Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE) (2003 – present); x Geology Instructor, Golden West College, 2010 – 2104, 2017; x Senior Environmental Analyst, Komex H2O Science, Inc. (2000 -- 2003); ƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚ

1-40
Cont.
2 x Executive Director, Orange Coast Watch (2001 – 2004); x Senior Science Policy Advisor and Hydrogeologist, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1989– 1998);
x Hydrogeologist, National Park Service, Water Resources Division (1998 – 2000); x Adjunct Faculty Member, San Francisco State University, Department of Geosciences (1993 – 1998);
x Instructor, College of Marin, Department of Science (1990 – 1995); x Geologist, U.S. Forest Service (1986 – 1998); and
x Geologist, Dames & Moore (1984 – 1986).

Senior Regulatory and Litigation Support Analyst:

With SWAPE, Matt’s responsibilities have included:
x Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of over 300 environmental impact reports and negative declarations since 2003 under CEQA that identify significant issues with regard to hazardous waste, water resources, water quality, air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, and geologic hazards. Make recommendations for additional mitigation measures to lead agencies at the local and county level to include additional characterization of health risks and implementation of protective measures to reduce worker exposure to hazards from toxins and Valley Fever.
x Stormwater analysis, sampling and best management practice evaluation at more than 100 industrial facilities.
x Expert witness on numerous cases including, for example, perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) contamination of groundwater, MTBE litigation, air toxins at hazards at a school, CERCLA compliance in assessment and remediation, and industrial stormwater contamination. x Technical assistance and litigation support for vapor intrusion concerns. x Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of environmental issues in license applications for large solar power plants before the California Energy Commission. x Manager of a project to evaluate numerous formerly used military sites in the western U.S. x Manager of a comprehensive evaluation of potential sources of perchlorate contamination in Southern California drinking water wells.
x Manager and designated expert for litigation support under provisions of Proposition 65 in the review of releases of gasoline to sources drinking water at major refineries and hundreds of gas stations throughout California.

With Komex H2O Science Inc., Matt’s duties included the following:
x Senior author of a report on the extent of perchlorate contamination that was used in testimony by the former U.S. EPA Administrator and General Counsel. x Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of MTBE use, research, and regulation.
x Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of perchlorate use, research, and regulation.
x Senior researcher in a study that estimates nationwide costs for MTBE remediation and drinking water treatment, results of which were published in newspapers nationwide and in testimony against provisions of an energy bill that would limit liability for oil companies. x Research to support litigation to restore drinking water supplies that have been contaminated by MTBE in California and New York.

3 x Expert witness testimony in a case of oil production-related contamination in Mississippi. x Lead author for a multi-volume remedial investigation report for an operating school in Los Angeles that met strict regulatory requirements and rigorous deadlines. x Development of strategic approaches for cleanup of contaminated sites in consultation with clients and regulators.

Executive Director:

As Executive Director with Orange Coast Watch, Matt led efforts to restore water quality at Orange County beaches from multiple sources of contamination including urban runoff and the discharge of wastewater. In reporting to a Board of Directors that included representatives from leading Orange County universities and businesses, Matt prepared issue papers in the areas of treatment and disinfection of wastewater and control of the discharge of grease to sewer systems. Matt actively participated in the development of countywide water quality permits for the control of urban runoff and permits for the discharge of wastewater. Matt worked with other nonprofits to protect and restore water quality, including Surfrider, Natural Resources Defense Council and Orange County CoastKeeper as well as with business institutions including the Orange County Business Council.

Hydrogeology:

As a Senior Hydrogeologist with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Matt led investigations to characterize and cleanup closing m ilitary bases, including Mare Island Naval Shipyard, Hunters Point Naval Shipyard, Treasure Island Naval Station, Alameda Naval Station, Moffett Field, Mather Army Airfield, and Sacramento Army Depot. Specific activities were as follows:
x Led efforts to model groundwater flow and contaminant transport, ensured adequacy of monitoring networks, and assessed cleanup alternatives for contaminated sediment, soil, and groundwater.
x Initiated a regional program for evaluation of groundwater sampling practices and laboratory analysis at military bases.
x Identified emerging issues, wrote technical guidance, and assisted in policy and regulation development through work on four national U.S. EPA workgroups, including the Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum and the Federal Facilities Forum.

At the request of the State of Hawaii, Matt developed a methodology to determine the vulnerability of

groundwater to contamination on the islands of Maui and Oahu. He used analytical models and a GIS to show zones of vulnerability, and the results were adopted and published by the State of Hawaii and County of Maui.

As a hydrogeologist with the EPA Groundwater Protection Section, Matt worked with provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act and NEPA to prevent drinking water contamination. Specific activities included the following:
x Received an EPA Bronze Medal for his contribution to the development of national guidance for the protection of drinking water.
x Managed the Sole Source Aquifer Program and protected the drinking water of two communities through designation under the Safe Drinking Water Act. He prepared geologic reports, conducted 1-40
Cont.

4 public hearings, and responded to public comments from residents who were very concerned about the impact of designation.
x Reviewed a number of Environmental Impact Statements for planned major developments, including large hazardous and solid waste disposal facilities, mine reclamation, and water transfer.

Matt served as a hydrogeologist with the RCRA Hazardous Waste program. Duties were as follows:
x Supervised the hydrogeologic investigation of hazardous waste sites to determine compliance with Subtitle C requirements.
x Reviewed and wrote "part B" permits for the disposal of hazardous waste. x Conducted RCRA Corrective Action investigations of waste sites and led inspections that formed the basis for significant enforcement actions that were developed in close coordination with U.S.

EPA legal counsel.
x Wrote contract specifications and supervised contractor’s investigations of waste sites.

With the National Park Service, Matt directed service-wide investigations of contaminant sources to prevent degradation of water quality, including the following tasks:
x Applied pertinent laws and regulations including CERCLA, RCRA, NEPA, NRDA, and the Clean Water Act to control military, mining, and landfill contaminants. x Conducted watershed-scale investigations of contaminants at parks, including Yellowstone and Olympic National Park.
x Identified high-levels of perchlorate in soil adjacent to a national park in New Mexico and advised park superintendent on appropriate response actions under CERCLA. x Served as a Park Service representative on the Interagency Perchlorate Steering Committee, a national workgroup.
x Developed a program to conduct environmental compliance audits of all National Parks while serving on a national workgroup.
x Co-authored two papers on the potential for water contamination from the operation of personal watercraft and snowmobiles, these papers serving as the basis for the development of nation- wide policy on the use of these vehicles in National Parks. x Contributed to the Federal Multi-Agency Source Water Agreement under the Clean Water Action Plan.

Policy:

Served senior management as the Senior Science Policy Advisor with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9.

Activities included the following:
x Advised the Regional Administrator and senior management on emerging issues such as the potential for the gasoline additive MTBE and ammonium perchlorate to contaminate drinking water supplies.
x Shaped EPA’s national response to these threats by serving on workgroups and by contributing to guidance, including the Office of Research and Development publication, Oxygenates in Water: Critical Information and Research Needs.
x Improved the technical training of EPA's scientific and engineering staff. x Earned an EPA Bronze Medal for representing the region’s 300 scientists and engineers in negotiations with the Administrator and senior management to better integrate scientific 1-40
Cont.

5 principles into the policy-making process.
x Established national protocol for the peer review of scientific documents.

Geology:

With the U.S. Forest Service, Matt led investigations to determine hillslope stability of areas proposed for timber harvest in the central Oregon Coast Range. Specific activities were as follows:
x Mapped geology in the field, and used aerial photographic interpretation and mathematical models to determine slope stability.
x Coordinated his research with community members who were concerned with natural resource protection.
x Characterized the geology of an aquifer that serves as the sole source of drinking water for the city of Medford, Oregon.

As a consultant with Dames and Moore, Matt led geologic investigations of two contaminated sites (later listed on the Superfund NPL) in the Portland, Oregon, area and a large hazardous waste site in eastern Oregon. Duties included the following:
x Supervised year-long effort for soil and groundwater sampling. x Conducted aquifer tests.
x Investigated active faults beneath sites proposed for hazardous waste disposal.

Teaching:

From 1990 to 1998, Matt taught at least one course per semester at the community college and university levels:
x At San Francisco State University, held an adjunct faculty position and taught courses in environmental geology, oceanography (lab and lecture), hydrogeology, and groundwater contamination.
x Served as a committee member for graduate and undergraduate students. x Taught courses in environmental geology and oceanography at the College of Marin.

Matt is currently a part time geology instructor at Golden West College in Huntington Beach, California where he taught from 2010 to 2014 and in 2017.

Invited Testimony, Reports, Papers and Presentations:

Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Presentation to the Public Environmental Law Conference, Eugene, Oregon.

Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Invited presentation to U.S.

EPA Region 9, San Francisco, California.

Hagemann, M.F., 2005. Use of Electronic Databases in Environmental Regulation, Policy Making and Public Participation. Brownfields 2005, Denver, Coloradao.

Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Nevada and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Las Vegas, NV (served on conference organizing committee).
1-40
Cont.

6 Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Invited testimony to a California Senate committee hearing on air toxins at schools in Southern California, Los Angeles.

Brown, A., Farrow, J., Gray, A. and Hagemann, M., 2004. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells.

Presentation to the Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference, National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Arizona and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Phoenix, AZ (served on conference organizing committee).

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in the Southwestern U.S. Invited presentation to a special committee meeting of the National Academy of Sciences, Irvine, CA.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a tribal EPA meeting, Pechanga, CA.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a meeting of tribal repesentatives, Parker, AZ.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Impact of Perchlorate on the Colorado River and Associated Drinking Water Supplies. Invited presentation to the Inter-Tribal Meeting, Torres Martinez Tribe.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. The Emergence of Perchlorate as a Widespread Drinking Water Contaminant.

Invited presentation to the U.S. EPA Region 9.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. A Deductive Approach to the Assessment of Perchlorate Contamination. Invited presentation to the California Assembly Natural Resources Committee.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate: A Cold War Legacy in Drinking Water. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater and an Estimate of Costs to Address Impacts to Groundwater. Presentation to the annual meeting of the Society of Environmental Journalists.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of the Cost to Address MTBE Contamination in Groundwater (and Who Will Pay). Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells. Presentation to a meeting of the U.S. EPA and State Underground Storage Tank Program managers.
1-40
Cont.

7 Hagemann, M.F ., 2001. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwat er. Unpublished report.

Hagemann, M.F ., 2001. Estimated Cleanup Cost for MTBE in Groundwater Used as Drinking Water.

Unpublished report.

Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Leaking Underground Storage Tanks. Unpublished report.

Hagemann, M.F ., and VanMouwerik, M., 1999. Potential W a t e r Quality Concerns Related to Snowmobile Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.

VanMouwerik, M. and Hagemann, M.F . 1999, Water Quality Concerns Related to Personal Watercraft Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.

Hagemann, M.F ., 1999, Is Dilution the Solution to Pollution in National Parks? The George Wright Society Biannual Meeting, Asheville, North Carolina.

Hagemann, M.F ., 1997, The Potential for MTBE to Contaminate Groundwater. U.S. EPA Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada.

Hagemann, M.F ., and Gill, M., 1996, Impediments to Intrinsic Remediation, Moffett Field Naval Air Station, Conference on Intrinsic Remediation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons, Salt Lake City.

Hagemann, M.F., Fukunaga, G.L., 1996, The Vulnerability of Groundwater to Anthropogenic Contaminants on the Island of Maui, Hawaii. Hawaii Water Works Association Annual Meeting, Maui, October 1996.

Hagemann, M. F., Fukanaga, G. L., 1996, Ranking Groundwater Vulnerability in Central Oahu, Hawaii. Proceedings, Geographic Information Systems in Environmental Resources Management, Air and Waste Management Association Publication VIP-61.

Hagemann, M.F., 1994. Groundwater Ch ar ac te r i z a t i o n and Cl ean up a t Closing Military Bases in California. Proceedings, California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting.

Hagemann, M. F. and Sabol, M.A., 1993. Role of the U.S. EPA in the High Plains States Groundwater Recharge Demonstration Program. Proceedings, Sixth Biennial Symposium on the Artificial Recharge of Groundwater.

Hagemann, M.F ., 1993. U.S. EPA Policy on the Technical Impracticability of the Cleanup of DNAPL- contaminated Groundwater. California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting. 1-40
Cont.

8 Hagemann, M.F., 1992. Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquid Contamination of Groundwater: An Ounce of Prevention... Proceedings, Association of Engineering Geologists Annual Meeting, v. 35.

Other Experience:

Selected as subject matter expert for the California Professional Geologist licensing examinations, 2009-2011.
1-40
Cont.

SOIL WATER AIR PROTECTION ENTERPRISE
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, California 90405
Attn: Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D.

Mobil: (310) 795-2335
Office: (310) 452-5555
Fax: (310) 452-5550
Email: [email protected]
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 1 of 10 October 2021
3DXO5RVHQIHOG3K' Chemical Fate and Transport & Air Dispersion Modeling Principal Environmental Chemist Risk Assessment & Remediation Specialist Education
Ph.D. Soil Chemistry, University of Washington, 1999. Dissertation on volatile organic compound filtration.

M.S. Environmental Science, U.C. Berkeley, 1995. Thesis on organic waste economics.

B.A. Environmental Studies, U.C. Santa Barbara, 1991. Thesis on wastewater treatment.

Professional Experience
Dr. Rosenfeld has over 25 years’ experience conducting environmental investigations and risk assessments for evaluating impacts to human health, property, and ecological receptors. His expertise focuses on the fate and transport of environmental contaminants, human health risk, exposure assessment, and ecological restoration. Dr.

Rosenfeld has evaluated and modeled emissions from oil spills, landfills, boilers and incinerators, process stacks, storage tanks, confined animal feeding operations, industrial, military and agricultural sources, unconventional oil drilling operations, and locomotive and construction engines. His project experience ranges from monitoring and modeling of pollution sources to evaluating impacts of pollution on workers at industrial facilities and residents in surrounding communities. Dr. Rosenfeld has also successfully modeled exposure to contaminants distributed by water systems and via vapor intrusion.

Dr. Rosenfeld has investigated and designed remediation programs and risk assessments for contaminated sites containing lead, heavy metals, mold, bacteria, particulate matter, petroleum hydrocarbons, chlorinated solvents, pesticides, radioactive waste, dioxins and furans, semi- and volatile organic compounds, PCBs, PAHs, creosote, perchlorate, asbestos, per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFOA/PFOS), unusual polymers, fuel oxygenates (MTBE), among other pollutants. Dr. Rosenfeld also has experience evaluating greenhouse gas emissions from various projects and is an expert on the assessment of odors from industrial and agricultural sites, as well as the evaluation of odor nuisance impacts and technologies for abatement of odorous emissions. As a principal scientist at SWAPE, Dr. Rosenfeld directs air dispersion modeling and exposure assessments. He has served as an expert witness and testified about pollution sources causing nuisance and/or personal injury at sites and has testified as an expert witness on numerous cases involving exposure to soil, water and air contaminants from industrial, railroad, agricultural, and military sources.
ƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚ
1-40
Cont.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 2 of 10 October 2021 
Professional History:

Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE); 2003 to present; Principal and Founding Partner UCLA School of Public Health; 2007 to 2011; Lecturer (Assistant Researcher) UCLA School of Public Health; 2003 to 2006; Adjunct Professor UCLA Environmental Science and Engineering Program; 2002-2004; Doctoral Intern Coordinator UCLA Institute of the Environment, 2001-2002; Research Associate Komex H2O Science, 2001 to 2003; Senior Remediation Scientist National Groundwater Association, 2002-2004; Lecturer
San Diego State University, 1999-2001; Adjunct Professor Anteon Corp., San Diego, 2000-2001; Remediation Project Manager Ogden (now Amec), San Diego, 2000-2000; Remediation Project Manager Bechtel, San Diego, California, 1999 – 2000; Risk Assessor King County, Seattle, 1996 – 1999; Scientist
James River Corp., Washington, 1995-96; Scientist
Big Creek Lumber, Davenport, California, 1995; Scientist Plumas Corp., California and USFS, Tahoe 1993-1995; Scientist Peace Corps and World Wildlife Fund, St. Kitts, West Indies, 1991-1993; Scientist Publications:

Remy, L.L., Clay T., Byers, V., Rosenfeld P. E. (2019) Hospital, Health, and Community Burden After Oil Refinery Fires, Richmond, California 2007 and 2012. Environmental Health. 18:48 Simons, R.A., Seo, Y. Rosenfeld, P., (2015) Modeling the Effect of Refinery Emission On Residential Property Value. Journal of Real Estate Research. 27(3):321-342
Chen, J. A, Zapata A. R., Sutherland A. J., Molmen, D.R., Chow, B. S., Wu, L. E., Rosenfeld, P. E., Hesse, R. C., (2012) Sulfur Dioxide and Volatile Organic Compound Exposure To A Community In Texas City Texas Evaluated Using Aermod and Empirical Data. American Journal of Environmental Science, 8(6), 622-632.

Rosenfeld, P.E. & Feng, L. (2011). The Risks of Hazardous Waste. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2011). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Agrochemical Industry, Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Gonzalez, J., Feng, L., Sutherland, A., Waller, C., Sok, H., Hesse, R., Rosenfeld, P. (2010). PCBs and Dioxins/Furans in Attic Dust Collected Near Former PCB Production and Secondary Copper Facilities in Sauget, IL.

Procedia Environmental Sciences. 113–125.

Feng, L., Wu, C., Tam, L., Sutherland, A.J., Clark, J.J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Dioxin and Furan Blood Lipid and Attic Dust Concentrations in Populations Living Near Four Wood Treatment Facilities in the United States. Journal of Environmental Health. 73(6), 34-46.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Wood and Paper Industries. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2009). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Petroleum Industry. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Air Pollution, 123 (17), 319-327.
1-40
Cont.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 3 of 10 October 2021 
Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). A Statistical Analysis Of Attic Dust And Blood Lipid Concentrations Of Tetrachloro-p-Dibenzodioxin (TCDD) Toxicity Equivalency Quotients (TEQ) In Two Populations Near Wood Treatment Facilities. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 002252-002255.

Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). Methods For Collect Samples For Assessing Dioxins And Other Environmental Contaminants In Attic Dust: A Review. Organohalogen Compounds , 70, 000527- 000530.

Hensley, A.R. A. Scott, J. J. J. Clark, Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Attic Dust and Human Blood Samples Collected near a Former Wood Treatment Facility. Environmental Research. 105, 194-197.

Rosenfeld, P.E., J. J. J. Clark, A. R. Hensley, M. Suffet. (2007). The Use of an Odor Wheel Classification for Evaluation of Human Health Risk Criteria for Compost Facilities. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 345-357.

Rosenfeld, P. E., M. Suffet. (2007). The Anatomy Of Odour Wheels For Odours Of Drinking Water, Wastewater, Compost And The Urban Environment. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 335-344.

Sullivan, P. J. Clark, J.J.J., Agardy, F. J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Toxic Legacy, Synthetic Toxins in the Food, Water, and Air in American Cities. Boston Massachusetts: Elsevier Publishing Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash. Water Science and Technology. 49(9),171-178.

Rosenfeld P. E., J.J. Clark, I.H. (Mel) Suffet (2004). The Value of An Odor-Quality-Wheel Classification Scheme For The Urban Environment. Water Environment Federation’s Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC) 2004. New Orleans, October 2-6, 2004.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet, I.H. (2004). Understanding Odorants Associated With Compost, Biomass Facilities, and the Land Application of Biosolids. Water Science and Technology. 49(9), 193-199.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash, Water Science and Technology, 49( 9), 171-178.

Rosenfeld, P. E ., Grey, M. A., Sellew, P. (2004). Measurement of Biosolids Odor and Odorant Emissions from Windrows, Static Pile and Biofilter. Water Environment Research. 76(4), 310-315.

Rosenfeld, P.E., Grey, M and Suffet, M. (2002). Compost Demonstration Project, Sacramento California Using High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Integrated Waste Management Board Public Affairs Office, Publications Clearinghouse (MS–6), Sacramento, CA Publication #442-02-008.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Characterization of odor emissions from three different biosolids. Water Soil and Air Pollution. 127(1-4), 173-191.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2000). Wood ash control of odor emissions from biosolids application. Journal of Environmental Quality. 29, 1662-1668.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry and D. Bennett. (2001). Wastewater dewatering polymer affect on biosolids odor emissions and microbial activity. Water Environment Research. 73(4), 363-367.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Activated Carbon and Wood Ash Sorption of Wastewater, Compost, and Biosolids Odorants. Water Environment Research, 73, 388-393.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2001). High carbon wood ash effect on biosolids microbial activity and odor.

Water Environment Research. 131(1-4), 247-262.
1-40
Cont.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 4 of 10 October 2021 
Chollack, T. and P. Rosenfeld. ( 1998). Compost Amendment Handbook For Landscaping. Prepared for and distributed by the City of Redmond, Washington State.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1992). The Mount Liamuiga Crater Trail. Heritage Magazine of St. Kitts, 3(2).

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1993). High School Biogas Project to Prevent Deforestation On St. Kitts. Biomass Users Network, 7(1).

Rosenfeld, P. E. ( 1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions From Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Doctoral Thesis. University of Washington College of Forest Resources.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1994). Potential Utilization of Small Diameter Trees on Sierra County Public Land. Masters thesis reprinted by the Sierra County Economic Council. Sierra County, California.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1991). How to Build a Small Rural Anaerobic Digester & Uses Of Biogas In The First And Third World. Bachelors Thesis. University of California.

Presentations:

Rosenfeld, P.E ., "The science for Perfluorinated Chemicals (PFAS): What makes remediation so hard?" Law Seminars International, (May 9-10, 2018) 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 101 Seattle, WA.

Rosenfeld, P.E., Sutherland, A; Hesse, R.; Zapata, A. (October 3-6, 2013). Air dispersion modeling of volatile organic emissions from multiple natural gas wells in Decatur, TX. 44th Western Regional Meeting, American Chemical Society. Lecture conducted from Santa Clara, CA.

Sok, H.L.; Waller, C.C.; Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sutherland, A.J.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Atrazine: A Persistent Pesticide in Urban Drinking Water .

Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.

Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sok, H.L.; Sutherland, A.J.; Waller, C.C.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; La, M.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Bringing Environmental Justice to East St. Louis, Illinois. Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.

Rosenfeld, P.E . (April 19-23, 2009). Perfluoroctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluoroactane Sulfonate (PFOS) Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting , Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ.

Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Cost to Filter Atrazine Contamination from Drinking Water in the United States” Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting . Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ.

Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P . (20-22 July, 2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. Brebbia, C.A. and Popov, V., eds., Air Pollution XVII: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Modeling, Monitoring and Management of Air Pollution. Lecture conducted from Tallinn, Estonia.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Moss Point Community Exposure To Contaminants From A Releasing Facility. The 23
rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). The Repeated Trespass of Tritium-Contaminated Water Into A Surrounding Community Form Repeated Waste Spills From A Nuclear Power Plant . The 23 rd Annual International 1-40
Cont.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 5 of 10 October 2021 
Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water . Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Somerville Community Exposure To Contaminants From Wood Treatment Facility Emissions. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water . Lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Production, Chemical Properties, Toxicology, & Treatment Case Studies of 1,2,3- Trichloropropane (TCP). The Association for Environmental Health and Sciences (AEHS) Annual Meeting . Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA.

Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Blood and Attic Sampling for Dioxin/Furan, PAH, and Metal Exposure in Florala, Alabama. The AEHS Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA.

Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (August 21 – 25, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. The 26th International Symposium on Halogenated Persistent Organic Pollutants – DIOXIN2006 . Lecture conducted from Radisson SAS Scandinavia Hotel in Oslo Norway.

Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (November 4-8, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility . APHA 134 Annual Meeting & Exposition. Lecture conducted from Boston Massachusetts.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D . (October 24-25, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.

Mealey’s C8/PFOA. Science, Risk & Litigation Conference. Lecture conducted from The Rittenhouse Hotel, Philadelphia, PA.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D . (September 19, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference . Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel, Irvine California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D . (September 19, 2005). Fate, Transport, Toxicity, And Persistence of 1,2,3-TCP. PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel in Irvine, California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 26-27, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PDBEs. Mealey’s Groundwater Conference. Lecture conducted from Ritz Carlton Hotel, Marina Del Ray, California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D . (June 7-8, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.

International Society of Environmental Forensics: Focus On Emerging Contaminants . Lecture conducted from Sheraton Oceanfront Hotel, Virginia Beach, Virginia.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D . (July 21-22, 2005). Fate Transport, Persistence and Toxicology of PFOA and Related Perfluorochemicals. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water And Environmental Law Conference .

Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D . (July 21-22, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. and Rob Hesse R.G. (May 5-6, 2004). Tert-butyl Alcohol Liability and Toxicology, A National Problem and Unquantified Liability. National Groundwater Association. Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Congress Plaza Hotel, Chicago Illinois.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (March 2004). Perchlorate Toxicology. Meeting of the American Groundwater Trust .

Lecture conducted from Phoenix Arizona.
1-40
Cont.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 6 of 10 October 2021 
Hagemann, M.F., Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and Rob Hesse (2004). Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River.

Meeting of tribal representatives. Lecture conducted from Parker, AZ.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (April 7, 2004). A National Damage Assessment Model For PCE and Dry Cleaners.

Drycleaner Symposium. California Ground Water Association . Lecture conducted from Radison Hotel, Sacramento, California.

Rosenfeld, P. E ., Grey, M., (June 2003) Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Seventh International In Situ And On Site Bioremediation Symposium Battelle Conference Orlando, FL.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. (February 20-21, 2003) Understanding Historical Use, Chemical Properties, Toxicity and Regulatory Guidance of 1,4 Dioxane. National Groundwater Association. Southwest Focus Conference. Water Supply and Emerging Contaminants .. Lecture conducted from Hyatt Regency Phoenix Arizona.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (February 6-7, 2003). Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. California CUPA Forum. Lecture conducted from Marriott Hotel, Anaheim California.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D . (October 23, 2002) Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. EPA Underground Storage Tank Roundtable. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California.

Rosenfeld, P.E . and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Understanding Odor from Compost, Wastewater and Industrial Processes. Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain.

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Using High Carbon Wood Ash to Control Compost Odor.

Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association . Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain.

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (September 22-24, 2002). Biocycle Composting For Coastal Sage Restoration.

Northwest Biosolids Management Association. Lecture conducted from Vancouver Washington..

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (November 11-14, 2002). Using High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Soil Science Society Annual Conference. Lecture conducted from Indianapolis, Maryland.

Rosenfeld. P.E. (September 16, 2000). Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Water Environment Federation. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California.

Rosenfeld. P.E. ( October 16, 2000). Wood ash and biofilter control of compost odor. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Ocean Shores, California.

Rosenfeld, P.E. ( 2000). Bioremediation Using Organic Soil Amendments. California Resource Recovery Association. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California.

Rosenfeld, P.E ., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings . Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (1999). An evaluation of ash incorporation with biosolids for odor reduction. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Salt Lake City Utah.

Rosenfeld, P.E. , C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Comparison of Microbial Activity and Odor Emissions from Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Brown and Caldwell. Lecture conducted from Seattle Washington. 1-40
Cont.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 7 of 10 October 2021 
Rosenfeld, P.E. , C.L. Henry. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions from Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Lake Chelan, Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E, C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E. , C.L. Henry, R. B. Harrison, and R. Dills. (1997). Comparison of Odor Emissions From Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Soil Science Society of America . Lecture conducted from Anaheim California.

Teaching Experience:

UCLA Department of Environmental Health (Summer 2003 through 20010) Taught Environmental Health Science 100 to students, including undergrad, medical doctors, public health professionals and nurses. Course focused on the health effects of environmental contaminants.

National Ground Water Association, Successful Remediation Technologies. Custom Course in Sante Fe, New Mexico. May 21, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of fuel contaminants associated with underground storage tanks.

National Ground Water Association; Successful Remediation Technologies Course in Chicago Illinois. April 1, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of contaminants associated with Superfund and RCRA sites.

California Integrated Waste Management Board, April and May, 2001. Alternative Landfill Caps Seminar in San Diego, Ventura, and San Francisco. Focused on both prescriptive and innovative landfill cover design.

UCLA Department of Environmental Engineering, February 5, 2002. Seminar on Successful Remediation Technologies focusing on Groundwater Remediation.

University Of Washington, Soil Science Program, Teaching Assistant for several courses including: Soil Chemistry, Organic Soil Amendments, and Soil Stability.

U.C. Berkeley, Environmental Science Program Teaching Assistant for Environmental Science 10.

Academic Grants Awarded:

California Integrated Waste Management Board. $41,000 grant awarded to UCLA Institute of the Environment.

Goal: To investigate effect of high carbon wood ash on volatile organic emissions from compost. 2001.

Synagro Technologies, Corona California: $10,000 grant awarded to San Diego State University.

Goal: investigate effect of biosolids for restoration and remediation of degraded coastal sage soils. 2000.

King County, Department of Research and Technology, Washin gton State. $100,000 grant awarded to University of Washington: Goal: To investigate odor emissions from biosolids application and the effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions. 1998.

Northwest Biosolids Management Association, Washington State. $20,000 grant awarded to investigate effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions from biosolids. 1997.

James River Corporation, Oregon: $10 ,000 grant was awarded to investigate the success of gen etically engineered Poplar trees with resistance to round-up. 1996.
1-40
Cont.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 8 of 10 October 2021 
United State Forest Service, Tahoe National Forest: $15,000 grant was awarded to investigating fire ecology of the Tahoe National Forest. 1995.

Kellogg Foundation, Washington D.C. $500 grant was awarde d to construct a large anae robic digester on St. Kitts in West Indies. 1993
Deposition and/or Trial Testimony:

In the Circuit Court Of The Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St Clair County, Illinois Martha Custer et al., Plaintiff vs. Cerro Flow Products, Inc., Defendants Case No.: No. 0i9-L-2295
Rosenfeld Deposition, 5-14-2021
Trial, October 8-4-2021
In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Joseph Rafferty, Plaintiff vs. Consolidated Rail Corporation and National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a AMTRAK,
Case No.: No. 18-L-6845
Rosenfeld Deposition, 6-28-2021
In the United States District Court For the Northern District of Illinois Theresa Romcoe, Plaintiff vs. Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation d/b/a METRA Rail, Defendants
Case No.: No. 17-cv-8517
Rosenfeld Deposition, 5-25-2021
In the Superior Court of the State of Arizona In and For the Cunty of Maricopa Mary Tryon et al., Plaintiff vs. The City of Pheonix v. Cox Cactus Farm, L.L.C., Utah Shelter Systems, Inc.

Case Number CV20127-094749
Rosenfeld Deposition: 5-7-2021
In the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Beaumont Division Robinson, Jeremy et al Plaintiffs, vs. CNA Insurance Company et al.

Case Number 1:17-cv-000508
Rosenfeld Deposition: 3-25-2021
In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Bernardino Gary Garner, Personal Representative for the Estate of Melvin Garner vs. BNSF Railway Company.

Case No. 1720288
Rosenfeld Deposition 2-23-2021
In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, Spring Street Courthouse Benny M Rodriguez vs. Union Pacific Railroad, A Corporation, et al.

Case No. 18STCV01162
Rosenfeld Deposition 12-23-2020
In the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri
Karen Cornwell, Plaintiff, vs. Marathon Petroleum, LP, Defendant.

Case No.: 1716-CV10006
Rosenfeld Deposition. 8-30-2019
In the United States District Court For The District of New Jersey Duarte et al, Plaintiffs, vs. United States Metals Refining Company et. al. Defendant.

Case No.: 2:17-cv-01624-ES-SCM
Rosenfeld Deposition. 6-7-2019
1-40
Cont.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 9 of 10 October 2021 
In the United States District Court of Southern District of Texas Galveston Division M/T Carla Maersk, Plaintiffs, vs. Conti 168., Schiffahrts-GMBH & Co. Bulker KG MS “Conti Perdido” Defendant.

Case No.: 3:15-CV-00106 consolidated with 3:15-CV-00237 Rosenfeld Deposition. 5-9-2019
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles – Santa Monica Carole-Taddeo-Bates et al., vs. Ifran Khan et al., Defendants Case No.: No. BC615636
Rosenfeld Deposition, 1-26-2019
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles – Santa Monica The San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments et al. vs El Adobe Apts. Inc. et al., Defendants Case No.: No. BC646857
Rosenfeld Deposition, 10-6-2018; Trial 3-7-19
In United States District Court For The District of Colorado Bells et al. Plaintiff vs. The 3M Company et al., Defendants Case No.: 1:16-cv-02531-RBJ
Rosenfeld Deposition, 3-15-2018 and 4-3-2018
In The District Court Of Regan County, Texas, 112 th Judicial District Phillip Bales et al., Plaintiff vs. Dow Agrosciences, LLC, et al., Defendants Cause No.: 1923
Rosenfeld Deposition, 11-17-2017
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Contra Costa Simons et al., Plaintiffs vs. Chevron Corporation, et al., Defendants Cause No C12-01481
Rosenfeld Deposition, 11-20-2017
In The Circuit Court Of The Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St Clair County, Illinois Martha Custer et al., Plaintiff vs. Cerro Flow Products, Inc., Defendants Case No.: No. 0i9-L-2295
Rosenfeld Deposition, 8-23-2017
In United States District Court For The Southern District of Mississippi Guy Manuel vs. The BP Exploration et al., Defendants
Case: No 1:19-cv-00315-RHW
Rosenfeld Deposition, 4-22-2020
In The Superior Court of the State of California, For The County of Los Angeles Warrn Gilbert and Penny Gilber, Plaintiff vs. BMW of North America LLC Case No.: LC102019 (c/w BC582154)
Rosenfeld Deposition, 8-16-2017, Trail 8-28-2018
In the Northern District Court of Mississippi, Greenville Division Brenda J. Cooper, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Meritor Inc., et al., Defendants Case Number: 4:16-cv-52-DMB-JVM
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2017
1-40
Cont.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 10 of 10 October 2021 
In The Superior Court of the State of Washington, County of Snohomish Michael Davis and Julie Davis et al., Plaintiff vs. Cedar Grove Composting Inc., Defendants Case No.: No. 13-2-03987-5
Rosenfeld Deposition, February 2017
Trial, March 2017
In The Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda Charles Spain., Plaintiff vs. Thermo Fisher Scientific, et al., Defendants Case No.: RG14711115
Rosenfeld Deposition, September 2015
In The Iowa District Court In And For Poweshiek County
Russell D. Winburn, et al., Plaintiffs vs. Doug Hoksbergen, et al., Defendants Case No.: LALA002187
Rosenfeld Deposition, August 2015
In The Circuit Court of Ohio County, West Virginia
Robert Andrews, et al. v. Antero, et al.

Civil Action N0. 14-C-30000
Rosenfeld Deposition, June 2015
In The Iowa District Court For Muscatine County
Laurie Freeman et. al. Plaintiffs vs. Grain Processing Corporation, Defendant Case No 4980
Rosenfeld Deposition: May 2015
In the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit, in and For Broward County, Florida Walter Hinton, et. al. Plaintiff, vs. City of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, a Municipality, Defendant.

Case Number CACE07030358 (26)
Rosenfeld Deposition: December 2014
In the County Court of Dallas County Texas
Lisa Parr et al, Plaintiff, vs. Aruba et al, Defendant.

Case Number cc-11-01650-E
Rosenfeld Deposition: March and September 2013
Rosenfeld Trial: April 2014
In the Court of Common Pleas of Tuscarawas County Ohio
John Michael Abicht, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Republic Services, Inc., et al., Defendants Case Number: 2008 CT 10 0741 (Cons. w/ 2009 CV 10 0987) Rosenfeld Deposition: October 2012
In the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, Northern Division James K. Benefield, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. International Paper Company, Defendant.

Civil Action Number 2:09-cv-232-WHA-TFM
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2010, June 2011
In the Circuit Court of Jefferson County Alabama
Jaeanette Moss Anthony, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Drummond Company Inc., et al., Defendants Civil Action No. CV 2008-2076
Rosenfeld Deposition: September 2010
In the United States District Court, Western District Lafayette Division Ackle et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Citgo Petroleum Corporation, et al., Defendants.

Case Number 2:07CV1052
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2009
1-40
Comment Letter 2
139 South Hudson Avenue
Suite 200
Pasadena, California 91101
Mitchell M.

Tsai
Attorney At Law
P: (626) 381-9248
F: (626) 389-5414
E: [email protected]

VIA E-MAIL
April 11May 10, 2022
Lisa Flores, Planning & Community Development Administrator City of Arcadia
240 West Huntington Drive, P.O. Box 600201
Arcadia, CA 91006
Em: [email protected]
RE:

Draft Environmental Impact ReportMay 10, 2022, Planning Commission Meeting, Agenda Item No. 02 for the Alexan Mixed- Use Development Project (SCH No. 2021070271)
Dear Lisa Flores,
On behalf of the Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters (“SWRCC” or “Southwest Carpenters”), my Office is submitting these comments on the City of Arcadia’s (“City ” or “Lead Agency”)
May 10, 2022 Planning Commission
Meeting, Agenda Item No. 02, regarding the Draft Environmental Impact Report
(“DEIR” or “EIR”) (SCH No. 2021070271) for the Alexan Mixed-Use Development Project (“Project”).

The Southwest Carpenters is a labor union representing more than 50,000 union carpenters in six states and has a strong interest in well ordered land use planning and addressing the environmental impacts of development projects.

Individual members of the Southwest Carpenters live, work and recreate in the City and surrounding communities and would be directly affected by the Project’s environmental impacts.

The Southwest Carpenters expressly reserves the right to supplement these comments at or prior to hearings on the Project, and at any later hearings and proceedings related to this Project. Cal. Gov. Code § 65009(b); Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 21177(a); Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. Bakersfield (2004) 124 Cal. App. 4th

1184, 1199-1203; see Galante Vineyards v. Monterey Water Dist. (1997) 60 Cal. App. 4th 1109, 1121.

SWRCC incorporates by reference all comments raising issues regarding the EIR submitted prior to certification of the EIR for the Project. Citizens for Clean Energy v City of Woodland (2014) 225 Cal. App. 4th 173, 191 (finding that any party who has objected

City of Arcadia – Alexan Mixed-Use Development Project
April 11May 10, 2022

to the Project’s environmental documentation may assert any issue timely raised by other parties).

Moreover, SWRCC requests that the Lead Agency provide notice for any and all notices referring or related to the Project issued under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), Cal Public Resources Code (“ PRC”) § 21000 et seq, and the California Planning and Zoning Law (“ Planning and Zoning Law ”), Cal. Gov’t Code §§ 65000–65010. California Publ ic Resources Code Sections 21092.2, and 21167(f) and Government Code Section 65 092 require agencies to mail such notices to any person who has filed a written reques t for them with the clerk of the agency’s governing body.

The City should require the Applicant provide additional community benefits such as requiring local hire and use of a skilled and trained workforce to build the Project.

The City should require the use of workers who have graduated from a Joint Labor Management apprenticeship training program approved by the State of California, or have at least as many hours of on-the-job experience in the applicable craft which would be required to graduate from such a state approved apprenticeship training program or who are registered apprentices in an apprenticeship training program approved by the State of California.

Community benefits such as local hire and skilled and trained workforce requirements can also be helpful to reduce environmental impacts and improve the positive economic impact of the Project. Local hire provisions requiring that a certain percentage of workers reside within 10 miles or less of the Project Site can reduce the length of vendor trips, reduce greenhouse gas emissions and providing localized economic benefits. Local hire provisions requiring that a certain percentage of workers reside within 10 miles or less of the Project Site can reduce the length of vendor trips, reduce greenhouse gas emissions and providing localized economic benefits. As environmental consultants Matt Hagemann and Paul E. Rosenfeld note:
[A]ny local hire requirement that results in a decreased worker trip length from the default value has the potential to result in a reduction of construction-related GHG emissions, though the significance of the reduction would vary based on the location and urbanization level of the project site.

City of Arcadia – Alexan Mixed-Use Development Project
April 11May 10, 2022

March 8, 2021 SWAPE Letter to Mitchell M. Tsai re Local Hire Requirements and Considerations for Greenhouse Gas Modeling.

Skilled and trained workforce requirements promote the development of skilled trades that yield sustainable economic development. As the California Workforce Development Board and the UC Berkeley Center for Labor Research and Education concluded:
. . . labor should be considered an investment rather than a cost – and investments in growing, diversifying, and upskilling California’s workforce can positively affect returns on climate mitigation efforts. In other words, well trained workers are key to de livering emissions reductions and moving California closer to its climate targets.1
Recently, on May 7, 2021, the South Coast Air Quality Management District found that the “ {u]se of a local state-certified appre nticeship program or a skilled and trained workforce with a local hire co mponent” can result in air pollutant reductions.2
Cities are increasingly adopting local skilled and trained workforce policies and requirements into general plans and municipal codes. For example, the City of Hayward 2040 General Plan requires the City to “promote local hiring . . . to help achieve a more positive jobs-housing balance, and reduce regional commuting, gas consumption, and greenhouse gas emissions.”
3 In fact, the City of Hayward has gone as far as to adopt a Skilled Labor Force policy into its Downtown Specific Plan and municipal code, requiring developments in its Downtown area to requiring that the City “{c]ontribute to the stabilization of regional construction markets by spurring applicants of housing and nonresidential developments to require contractors to utilize apprentices from state-approved, joint 1 California Workforce Development Board (2020) Putting California on the High Road: A Jobs and Climate Action Plan for 2030 at p. ii, available at https://laborcenter.berkeley.edu/ wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Putting-California-on-the-High-Road.pdf https://laborcenter.berkeley.edu/ wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Putting- California-on-the-High-Road.pdf
2 South Coast Air Quality Management District (May 7, 2021) Certify Final Environmental Assessment and Adopt Proposed Rule 2305 – Warehouse Indirect Source Rule – Warehouse Actions and Investments to Reduce Emissions Program, and Proposed Rule 316 – Fees for Rule 2305, Submit Rule 2305 for Inclusion Into the SIP, and Approve

Supporting Budget Actions, available at http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ Agendas/Governing-Board/2021/2021-May7-027.pdf?sfvrsn=10 3 City of Hayward (2014) Hayward 2040 General Plan Policy Document at p. 3-99, available at https://www.hayward-ca.gov/sites/default/files/documents/General_Plan_FINAL.pdf.

City of Arcadia – Alexan Mixed-Use Development Project
April 11May 10, 2022

labor-management training programs, . . .”4 In addition, the City of Hayward requires all projects 30,000 square feet or larger to “utilize apprentices from state- approved, joint labor-management training programs.”5
Locating jobs closer to residential areas can have significant environmental benefits.

As the California Planning Roundtable noted in 2008:

People who live and work in the sa me jurisdiction would be more likely to take transit, walk, or bicycle to work than residents of less balanced communities and their vehicle trips would be shorter. Benefits would include potential reductions in both vehicle miles traveled and vehicle hours traveled.
6 In addition, local hire mandates as well as skill training are critical facets of a strategy to reduce vehicle miles traveled. As planning experts Robert Cervero and Michael Duncan noted, simply placing jobs near housing stock is insufficient to achieve VMT reductions since the skill requirements of available local jobs must be matched to those held by local residents.
7 Some municipalities have tied local hire and skilled
and trained workforce policies to local development permits to address transportation issues. As Cervero and Duncan note:

In nearly built-out Berkeley, CA, the approach to balancing jobs and housing is to create local jobs rath er than to develop new housing.” The city’s First Source program encourages businesses to hire local residents, especially for entry- and intermediate-level jobs, and sponsors vocational training to ensure residents are employment-ready. While the program is voluntary, some 300 businesses have used it to date, placing more than 3,000 city residents in local jobs since it was launched in 1986. When needed, these carrots are matched by sticks, since the city is not shy about
4 City of Hayward (2019) Hayward Downtown Specific Plan at p. 5-24, available at https://www.hayward-ca.gov/sites/default/files/Hayward%20Downtown% 20Specific%20Plan.pdf.
5 City of Hayward Municipal Code, Chapter 10, § 28.5.3.020(C). 6 California Planning Roundtable (2008) Deconstructing Jobs-Housing Balance at p. 6, available at https://cproundtable.org/static/media/uploads/publications/cpr-jobs- housing.pdf
7 Cervero, Robert and Duncan, Michael (2006) Which Reduces Vehicle Travel More: Jobs- Housing Balance or Retail-Housing Mixing? Journal of the American Planning Association

72 (4), 475-490, 482, available at http://reconnectingamerica.org/assets/Uploads/UTCT- 825.pdf.

City of Arcadia – Alexan Mixed-Use Development Project
April 11May 10, 2022

negotiating corporate participation in First Source as a condition of approval for development permits.

The City should consider utilizing skilled and trained workforce policies and requirements to benefit the local area economically and mitigate greenhouse gas, air quality and transportation impacts.

The City should also require the Project to be built to standards exceeding the current 2019 California Green Building Code to mitigate the Project’s environmental impacts and to advance progress towards the State of California’s environmental goals.

I. THE PROJECT WOULD BE APPROVED IN VIOLATION OF THE

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
A. Background Concerning the Cali fornia Environmental Quality Act CEQA has two basic purposes. First, CEQA is designed to inform decision makers and the public about the potential, significant environmental effects of a project. 14 California Code of Regulations (“CCR” or “CEQA Guidelines”) § 15002(a)(1).8 “Its purpose is to inform the public and its responsible officials of the environmental consequences of their decisions before they are made. Thus, the EIR ‘protects not only the environment but also informed self-government.’ [Citation.]” Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors (1990) 52 Cal. 3d 553, 564. The EIR has been described as “an environmental ‘alarm bell’ whose purpose it is to alert the public and its responsible officials to environmental changes before they have reached ecological points of no return.” Berkeley Keep Jets Over the Bay v. Bd. of Port Comm’rs. (2001) 91 Cal. App. 4th 1344, 1354 (“Berkeley Jets)”; County of Inyo v. Yorty (1973) 32 Cal. App. 3d 795, 810.

Second, CEQA directs public agencies to avoid or reduce environmental damage when possible by requiring alternatives or mitigation measures. CEQA Guidelines § 15002(a)(2) and (3). See also, Berkeley Jets, 91 Cal. App. 4th 1344, 1354; Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors (1990) 52 Cal. 3d 553; Laurel Heights Improvement Ass’n v. Regents of the University of California (1988) 47 Cal. 3d 376, 400. The EIR serves to 8 The CEQA Guidelines, codified in Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, section 15000 et seq, are regulatory guidelines promulgated by the state Natural Resources Agency for the implementation of CEQA. Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 21083. The CEQA Guidelines are given “great weight in interpreting CEQA except when . . . clearly unauthorized or

erroneous.” Center for Biological Diversity v. Department of Fish & Wildlife (2015) 62 Cal. 4th 204, 217.

City of Arcadia – Alexan Mixed-Use Development Project
April 11May 10, 2022

provide public agencies and the public in general with information about the effect that a proposed project is likely to have on the environment and to “identify ways that environmental damage can be avoided or significantly reduced.” CEQA Guidelines § 15002(a)(2). If the project has a significant effect on the environment, the agency may approve the project only upon finding that it has “eliminated or substantially lessened all significant effects on the environment where feasible” and that any unavoidable significant effects on the environment are “acceptable due to overriding concerns” specified in CEQA section 21081. CEQA Guidelines § 15092(b)(2)(A–B).

While the courts review an EIR using an “abuse of discretion” standard, “the reviewing court is not to ‘uncritically rely on every study or analysis presented by a project proponent in support of its position.’ A ‘clearly inadequate or unsupported study is entitled to no judicial deference.’” Berkeley Jets, 91 Cal. App. 4th 1344, 1355 (emphasis added) (quoting Laurel Heights, 47 Cal. 3d at 391, 409 fn. 12). Drawing this line and determining whether the EIR complies with CEQA’s information disclosure requirements presents a question of law subject to independent review by the courts. Sierra Club v. Cnty. of Fresno (2018) 6 Cal. 5th 502, 515; Madera Oversight Coalition, Inc. v. County of Madera (2011) 199 Cal. App. 4th 48, 102, 131. As the court stated in Berkeley Jets, 91 Cal. App. 4th at 1355:

A prejudicial abuse of discretion occurs “if the failure to include relevant information precludes informed decision-making and informed public participation, thereby thwarting the statutory goals of the EIR process.

The preparation and circulation of an EIR is more than a set of technical hurdles for agencies and developers to overcome. The EIR’s function is to ensure that government officials who decide to build or approve a project do so with a full understanding of the environmental consequences and, equally important, that the public is assured those consequences have been considered. For the EIR to serve these goals it must present information so that the foreseeable impacts of pursuing the project can be understood and weighed, and the public must be given an adequate opportunity to comment on that presentation before the decision to go forward is made. Communities for a Better Environment v. Richmond (2010) 184 Cal. App. 4th 70, 80

(quoting Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. City of Rancho Cordova (2007) 40 Cal. 4th 412, 449–450).

City of Arcadia – Alexan Mixed-Use Development Project
May 10, 2022

B. CEQA Requires Revision and Recirc ulation of an Environmental Impact Report When Substantial Changes or New Information Comes to Light

City of Arcadia – Alexan Mixed-Use Development Project
April 11, 2022

Section 21092.1 of the California Public Resources Code requires that “[w]hen significant new information is added to an environmental impact report after notice has been given pursuant to Section 21092 ... but prior to certification, the public agency shall give notice again pursuant to Section 21092, and consult again pursuant to Sections 21104 and 21153 before certifying the environmental impact report” in order to give the public a chance to review and comment upon the information. CEQA Guidelines § 15088.5.

Significant new information includes “changes in the project or environmental setting as well as additional data or other information” that “deprives the public of a meaningful opportunity to comment upon a substantial adverse environmental effect of the project or a feasible way to mitigate or avoid such an effect (including a feasible project alternative).” CEQA Guidelines § 15088.5(a). Examples of significant new information requiring recirculation include “new significant environmental impacts from the project or from a new mitigation measure,” “substantial increase in the severity of an environmental impact,” “feasible project alternative or mitigation measure considerably different from others previously analyzed” as well as when “the draft EIR was so fundamentally and basically inadequate and conclusory in nature that meaningful public review and comment were precluded.” Id.

An agency has an obligation to recirculate an environmental impact report for public notice and comment due to “significant new information” regardless of whether the agency opts to include it in a project’s environmental impact report. Cadiz Land Co. v.

Rail Cycle (2000) 83 Cal. App. 4th 74, 95 [finding that in light of a new expert report disclosing potentially significant impacts to groundwater supply “the EIR should have been revised and recirculated for purposes of informing the public and governmental agencies of the volume of groundwater at risk and to allow the public and governmental agencies to respond to such information.”]. If significant new information was brought to the attention of an agency prior to certification, an agency is required to revise and recirculate that information as part of the environmental impact report.

City of Arcadia – Alexan Mixed-Use Development Project
May 10, 2022

C. Due to the COVID-19 Crisis, the Ci ty Must Adopt a Mandatory Finding of Significance that the Project May Cause a Substantial Adverse Effect on Human Beings and Mitigate COVID-19 Impacts

City of Arcadia – Alexan Mixed-Use Development Project
April 11, 2022

CEQA requires that an agency make a finding of significance when a Project may cause a significant adverse effect on human beings. PRC § 21083(b)(3); CEQA Guidelines § 15065(a)(4).

Public health risks related to construction work requires a mandatory finding of significance under CEQA. Construction work has been defined as a Lower to High- risk activity for COVID-19 spread by the Occupations Safety and Health Administration. Recently, several construction sites have been identified as sources of community spread of COVID-19.9
SWRCC recommends that the Lead Agency adopt additional CEQA mitigation measures to mitigate public health risks from the Project’s construction activities. SWRCC requests that the Lead Agency require safe on-site construction work practices as well as training and certification for any construction workers on the Project Site.

In particular, based upon SWRCC’s experience with safe construction site work practices, SWRCC recommends that the Lead Agency require that while construction activities are being conducted at the Project Site:

Construction Site Design:
x The Project Site will be limited to two controlled entry points. x Entry points will have temp erature screening technicians taking temperature readings when the entry point is open. x The Temperature Screening Site Plan shows details
regarding access to the Pro ject Site and Project Site
logistics for conducting temperature screening.
x A 48-hour advance notice will be provided to all trades prior to the first day of temperature screening.
xThe perimeter fence directly adjacent to the entry points will be clearly marked indicating the appropriate 6-foot social distancing position for when you approach the screening
9 Santa Clara County Public Health (June 12, 2020) COVID-19 CASES AT

CONSTRUCTION SITES HIGHLIGHT NEED FOR CONTINUED VIGILANCE IN SECTORS THAT HAVE REOPENED, available at https://www.sccgov.org/sites/ covid19/Pages/press-release-06-12-2020-cases-at-construction-sites.aspx.

City of Arcadia – Alexan Mixed-Use Development Project
April 11May 10, 2022

x The perimeter fence directly adjacent to the entry points will be clearly marked indicating the appropriate 6-foot social distancing position for when you approach the screening area. Please reference the Apex temperature screening site map for additional details.
x There will be clear signage posted at the project site directing you through temperature screening.
x Provide hand washing st ations throughout the
construction site.

Testing Procedures:
x The temperature screening being used are non-contact
devices.
x Temperature readings will not be recorded.
x Personnel will be screened upon entering the testing center and should only take 1-2 seconds per individual.
x Hard hats, head coverings, sweat, dirt, sunscreen or any other cosmetics must be removed on the forehead before
temperature screening.
x Anyone who refuses to submit to a temperature screening or does not answer the health screening questions will be refused access to the Project Site.
x Screening will be performed at both entrances from 5:30 am to 7:30 am.; main gate [ZONE 1] and personnel gate
[ZONE 2]
x After 7:30 am only the main gate entrance [ZONE 1] will continue to be used for te mperature testing for anybody gaining entry to the projec t site such as returning
personnel, deliveries, and visitors.
x If the digital thermometer displays a temperature reading above 100.0 degrees Fahrenheit, a second reading will be taken to verify an accurate reading.

City of Arcadia – Alexan Mixed-Use Development Project
May 10, 2022

x If the second reading confirms an elevated temperature, DHS will instruct the individual that he/she will not be allowed to enter the Project Site. DHS will also instruct the

City of Arcadia – Alexan Mixed-Use Development Project
April 11, 2022

individual to promptly notify his/her supervisor and his/her human resources (HR) representative and provide them
with a copy of Annex A.

Planning
x Require the development of an Infectious Disease Preparedness and Response Plan that will include basic infection prevention measures (requiring the use of personal protection equipment), policies and procedures for prompt identification and isolation of sick individuals, social distancing (prohibiting gatherings of no more than 10 people including all-hands meetings and all-hands lunches) communication and training and workplace controls that meet standards that may be promulgated by the Center for Disease Control, Occupational Safety and Health
Administration, Cal/OSHA, California Department of Public Health or applicable local public health agencies.
10 The United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Carpenters International Training Fund has developed COVID-19 Training and Certification to ensure that Carpenter union members and apprentices conduct safe work practices. The Agency should require that all construction workers undergo COVID-19 Training and Certification before being allowed to conduct construction activities at the Project Site.

SWRCC has also developed a rigorous Infection Control Risk Assessment (“ICRA”) training program to ensure it delivers a workforce that understands how to identify and control infection risks by implementing protocols to protect themselves and all others during renovation and construction projects in healthcare environments.11 ICRA protocols are intended to contain pathogens, control airflow, and protect patients during the construction, maintenance and renovation of healthcare facilities. 10 See also The Center for Construction Research and Training, North America’s Building Trades Unions (April 27 2020) NABTU and CPWR COVIC-19 Standards for U.S Constructions Sites, available at https://www.cpwr.com/sites/default/files/ NABTU_CPWR_Standards_COVID-19.pdf; Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (2020) Guidelines for Construction Sites During COVID-19 Pandemic, available at https://dpw.lacounty.gov/building-and-safety/docs/pw_guidelines-construction-sites.pdf.

11 For details concerning SWRCC’s ICRA training program, see https://icrahealthcare.com/.

City of Arcadia – Alexan Mixed-Use Development Project
April 11May 10, 2022

ICRA protocols are intended to contain pathogens, control airflow, and protect patients during the construction, maintenance and renovation of healthcare facilities. ICRA protocols prevent cross contamination, minimizing the risk of secondary infections in patients at hospital facilities.

The City should require the Project to be built using a workforce trained in ICRA protocols.

II. THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT IS INADEQUATE
A. The DEIR Fails to Establish the Existing Conditions for Hazards and Hazardous Materials

1. Background on Phase I and, II and, III Environmental Site Assessments The preparation of a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (“ESA”) is often undertaken in the preparation of CEQA documents to identify hazardous waste issues that may present impacts to the public, workers, or the environment, and which may require further investigation, including environmental sampling and cleanup.

Standards for performing a Phase I ESA have been established by the US EPA and the American Society for Testing and Materials Standards (ASTM)12 Phase I ESAs are conducted to identify conditions that would indicate a release of hazardous substances and include:
x A review of all known sites in the vicinity of the subject property that are on regulatory agency databases undergoing assessment or cleanup activities;
x An inspection;
• Interviews with people knowle dgeable about the property; and x Recommendations for further actions to address potential hazards.

Phase I ESAs may conclude with the identification of any “recognized environmental conditions” (“RECs”) and recommendations to address such conditions.

A REC is defined by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) E1527 as “the likely presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on or at the subject property due to a release or likely release to the environment”13 12 Available at,
http://www.astm.org/Standards/E1527.htm
If past land uses include RECs, a Phase II ESA must be
prepared in order to properly
12 Available at,
http://www.astm.org/Standards/E1527.htm
13 Ibid.

City of Arcadia – Alexan Mixed-Use Development Project
April 11May 10, 2022

subject property due to a release or likely release to the environment”13 If past land uses include RECs, a Phase II ESA must be prepared in order to properly evaluate the extent of the contamination identified on the Phase I ESA; and mitigate such impacts; as well as, the need for cleanup to reduce exposure potential to the public.

According to the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) E1903 in its standard practice guidelines for preparing Phase II Environmental Assessments,14 data gaps in Phase I ESAs indicate a need to prepare a Phase II ESA, even in the absence of any identified RECs.

The scope of the environmental due diligence process should include the Project’s environmental effects relating to emerging contaminants;, such as 1,2,3- Trichloropropane (1,2,3-TCP), Perchlorate; As well as per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), which are highly fluorinated manmade compounds.

Any contamination that is identified above regulatory screening levels, including California Department of Toxic Substances Control Soil Screening Levels, should be further evaluated and cleaned up, if necessary, in coordination with the Regional Water Quality Control Board and the California Department of Toxic Substances Control.

2. The DEIR Fails to Include a Phase II and Phase III ESA to Evaluate the Extent of the Project’s Impacts Relating to Those REC’sVapor Intrusion as well as the RECs Identified on the Phase I ESA The “Hazards and Hazardous Materials” section of the DEIR describes the affected environment and regulatory setting for hazards and hazardous materials in the Project site, as well as the project's potential impacts on residences and other sensitive receptors that could be exposed to these hazards. The DEIR states that “the historical cleaning use was identified as a recognized environmental condition (REC) and potential vapor encroachment condition (VEC).” DEIR, p. 4.7-4.

The Project’s RECs include tetrachloroethylene (PCE) (DEIR, p. 4.7-3), asbestos (DEIR, p. 4.7-4), petroleum hydrocarbons (DEIR, p. 4.7-6), solvents (DEIR, p. 4.7- 6),
13 Ibid.
14 Available at, https://www.astm.org/e1903-19.html

City of Arcadia – Alexan Mixed-Use Development Project
May 10, 2022

The DEIR failed to prepare a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment to properly evaluate the above recognized environmental conditions RECs. This lack of information regarding the Project site is a failure to establish the existing setting for the Project.
14 Available at, https://www.astm.org/e1903-19.html

City of Arcadia – Alexan Mixed-Use Development Project
April 11, 2022

According to the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) E1903 in its standard practice guidelines for preparing Phase II Environmental Assessments,15 a Phase II ESA must contains nine sections and four appendices.

The DEIR states that “{i]n response to these findings, a soil and soil vapor investigation was completed.” DEIR, p. 4.7-3. However, these two investigations fail to evaluate the entire Project site environmental setting. A Phase II ESA that covers the whole of the Project’s site is required to properly set the existing conditions for the project, as required under CEQA.

Further, the ESA fails to discuss the Project’s impacts relating to emerging contaminants.

Therefore, the City must prepare a Phase II and Phase III ESA and recirculate the DEIR
B. The EIR Fails to Properly Ev aluate and Mitigate the Project’s Impact Relating to the Diesel Fuel Above Ground Storage Tanks “AST”
The DEIR identifies the existence of Diesel Fuel Above Ground Storage Tanks “AST” on the Project site; Yet, it fails to evaluate such impacts.

The DEIR states that “{t]he presence of the two emergency backup generators with self-contained diesel fuel ASTs is a potential concern. However, the quantity of fuel in the generator ASTs is not considered significant . . . As such, the presence of the ASTs is considered a de minimis condition.” DEIR, App. F1, p. 6.

However, a de minimis condition conclusion is unsubstantiated; The EIR confirms that “{a]ccess into the generator containment area was not granted.” (DEIR, App.

F1, p. 5) and an inspection report states that the Los Angeles County Fire Department - Health Hazardous Materials Division previously “{i]nspected cellular equipment and battery storage building as well as one outdoor diesel fuel aboveground storage tank” (DEIR, Appendix F1, Appendix e) 15 Available at, https://www.astm.org/e1903-

19.html

City of Arcadia – Alexan Mixed-Use Development Project
May 10, 2022

The EIR must include backup generators in the project description, and analyze the impacts of those generators. A failure to identify backup generators impacts the adequacy of the EIR’s environmental analyses. Backup generators commonly rely on fuels such as natural gas or diesel, and thus can significantly impact air quality, GHG
15 Available at, https://www.astm.org/e1903-19.html

City of Arcadia – Alexan Mixed-Use Development Project
April 11, 2022

emissions, and public health through toxic diesel particulate (“DPM”) emissions.16 Backup generators increase operational emissions during testing periods and unscheduled. Diesel particulate matter (DPM) has been identified as a toxic air contaminant, composed of carbon particles and numerous organic compounds, including over forty known cancer-causing organic substances. The majority of DPM is small enough to be inhaled deep into the lungs and make them more susceptible to injury. Much of the back-up power produced during PSPS events is expected to come from engines regulated by CARB and California’s 35 air pollution control and air quality management districts.

Therefore, the City cannot approve the Project until the errors in the EIR are remedied and substantial evidence supporting its conclusions is provided in an environmental impact report
C. The EIR Fails to Properly Ev aluate and Mitigate the Project’s Indoor Air Quality and Vapor Intrusion Impacts

1. Background on Indoor Air Quality Impact
Indoor air quality (IAQ) directly impacts the comfort and health of building occupants, and the achievement of acceptable IAQ in newly constructed and renovated buildings is a well-recognized design objective. For example, IAQ is addressed by major highperformance building rating systems and building codes.

California Building Standards Commission, 2014; USGBC, 2014.

Indoor air quality in homes is particularly important because occupants, on average, spend approximately ninety percent of their time indoors with the majority of this time spent at home (EPA, 2011). Some segments of the population that are most susceptible to the effects of poor IAQ, such as the very young and the elderly, occupy their homes almost continuously. Additionally, an increasing number of adults are working from home at least some of the time during the workweek. Indoor air quality also is a serious concern for workers in hotels, offices and other business establishments. 16 California Air Resources Board, Emission Impact: Additional Generator Usage Associated with Power Outage (January 30, 2020), available at, https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default /files/2020-01/Emissions_Inventory_Generator_Demand%20Usage_During_ Power_Outage_01_30_20.pdf https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default /files/2020- 01/Emissions_Inventory_Generator_Demand%20Usage_During_ Power_Outage_01_30_20.pdf

City of Arcadia – Alexan Mixed-Use Development Project
April 11May 10, 2022

working from home at least some of the time during the workweek. Indoor air quality also is a serious concern for workers in hotels, offices and other business establishments.

The concentrations of many air pollutants often are elevated in homes and other buildings relative to outdoor air because many of the materials and products used indoors contain and release a variety of pollutants to air. Hodgson et al., 2002; Offermann and Hodgson, 2011. With respect to indoor air contaminants for which inhalation is the primary route of exposure, the critical design and construction parameters are the provision of adequate ventilation and the reduction of indoor sources of the contaminants.

2. 2. Background on Vapor Intrusion
Vapor forming chemical (VFC) are volatile chemicals that USEPA recommends be routinely evaluated during a site-specific vapor intrusion assessment when it is present as a subsurface contaminant (USEPA, 2015a). A volatile chemical is defined as a chemical with a vapor pressure greater than 1 milliliter of mercury, or Henry’s law constant greater than 10–5 atmosphere-meter cubed per mole.

Vapor intrusion (VI) is the migration of chemical vapors from the subsurface into buildings and is a frequent problem at contaminated sites. If uncontrolled, chemical vapors can migrate into buildings and pose a risk to human health. Vapor migration in the subsurface, through building foundations, and within buildings is complex and influenced by many natural and human-caused factors.

These factors include climate (e.g., temperature, pressure, precipitation), building conditions (e.g., foundation type and status, age, size), and heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) operation.

The combination of these factors can result in significant spatial and temporal variability in subsurface and indoor air vapor concentrations. With the potential for such high variability, the probability of false negatives increases – a concern that potential risks associated with VI into indoor air will be underestimated.

City of Arcadia – Alexan Mixed-Use Development Project
May 10, 2022

3. 3. The DEIR Fails to Properly Evaluate and Mitigate the Project’s Health Risk Impacts of Toxic Air and Vapor Intrusion
The DEIR fails to properly evaluate the health risk impacts of toxic air contaminant (“TAC”) emissions contribute d by the proposed project as well as cumulatively with other nearby TAC sources.

The Project’s air quality impacts is not limited to TAC. The Project site contain a series of vapor forming chemicals (“VFC”) which need to be evaluated for potential risks

City of Arcadia – Alexan Mixed-Use Development Project
April 11, 2022

associated with exposure to VFCs migrating from contaminated soil into new or existing buildings to ensure adequate protection of human health.

The Project’s indoor air According to the DEIR’s Subsurface Soil and Soil Vapor Investigation,
Detected VOCs in soil vapor samples that exceeded at least one human health screening level for vapor intrus ion based on a residential land use setting included benzene (15-foot bgs probe of MP5), and PCE (all probe intervals).

The lateral and vertical extent of PCE in soil vapor has not been assessed beneath the Site.

Indoor air sampling would be requi red to assess if vapor intrusion is occurring at the Site. Future reside ntial structures with slab-on-grade construction may require a vapor intr usion mitigation system (e.g. – sub- slab vapor barrier).

DEIR, App. F-4, p. 9.

The Project’s “[g]rading is estimated to result in approximately 57,000 cubic yards of excavation/export” of soil. DEIR p. 4.2-22. The DEIR fails to mention logistics regarding testing, soil remediation, or disposal of the soil at a facility appropriate for polluted soil. Excavation poses the risk of carcinogenic VOCs and polluted soil escaping into the air breathed by neighboring residents and the Project’s construction crew. These same VOCs pose a risk of vapor intrusion into the new construction, endangering the construction workers and future building occupants.

Therefore, the EIR should be revised to include a Vapor Intrusion assessment to properly evaluate and mitigate the Project’s potential risk to occupant health, screening

City of Arcadia – Alexan Mixed-Use Development Project
May 10, 2022

the vulnerability of individual buildings to vapor intrusion, and identifying nature of contaminant/vapor mobility over time.

City of Arcadia – Alexan Mixed-Use Development Project
April 11, 2022

4. The DEIR Improperly Defers Development of Vapor Intrusion Environmental Mitigation Measures
CEQA mitigation measures proposed and adopted into an environmental impact report are required to describe what actions that will be taken to reduce or avoid an environmental impact. CEQA Guidelines § 15126.4(a)(1)(B) (providing “[f]ormulation of mitigation measures should not be deferred until some future time.”). While the same Guidelines section 15126.5(a)(1)(B) acknowledges an exception to the rule against deferrals, but such exception is narrowly proscribed to situations where “measures may specify performance standards which would mitigate the significant effect of the project and which may be accomplished in more than one specified way.” (Id.) Courts have also recognized a similar exception to the general rule against deferral of mitigation measures where the performance criteria for each mitigation measure is identified and described in the EIR. Sacramento Old City Ass’n v.

City Council (1991) 229 Cal.App.3d 1011.

Impermissible deferral can occur when an EIR calls for mitigation measures to be created based on future studies or describes mitigation measures in general terms but the agency fails to commit itself to specific performance standards. Preserve Wild Santee v. City of Santee (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 260, 281 (city improperly deferred mitigation to butterfly habitat by failing to provide standards or guidelines for its management); San Joaquin Raptor Rescue Center v. County of Merced (2007) 149 Cal.App.4th 645, 671 (EIR failed to provide and commit to specific criteria or standard of performance for mitigating impacts to biological habitats); see also Cleveland Nat'l Forest Found. v San Diego Ass'n of Gov'ts (2017) 17 Cal.App.5th 413, 442 (generalized air quality measures in the EIR failed to set performance standards); California Clean Energy Comm. v City of Woodland (2014) 225 Cal.App.4th 173, 195 (agency could not rely on a future report on urban decay with no standards for determining whether mitigation required); POET, LLC v. State Air Resources Bd. (2013) 218 Cal.App.4th 681, 740 (agency could not rely on future rulemaking to establish specifications to ensure emissions of nitrogen oxide would not increase because it did not establish objective performance criteria for measuring whether that goal would be achieved); Gray v. County of Madera (2008) 167 Cal.App.4th 1099, 1119 (rejecting mitigation measure requiring replacement water to be provided to neighboring landowners because it identified a general goal

City of Arcadia – Alexan Mixed-Use Development Project
May 10, 2022

for mitigation rather than specific performance standard); Endangered Habitats League,

City of Arcadia – Alexan Mixed-Use Development Project
April 11, 2022

Inc. v. County of Orange (2005) 131 Cal.App.4th 777, 794 (requiring report without established standards is impermissible delay).

According to the DEIR, mitigation measure MM-HAZ-3 states that “{t]he construction contractor shall incorporate vapor mitigation design features into building plans that reduce potential vapor intrusion in buildings and enclosed structures on the Project site below DTSC Screening Levels.” DEIR 4.27-24.

However, the DEIR fails to identify or mention any of such mitigation design features.

Therefore, the EIR should be revised to properly mitigate its vapor intrusion impacts.

D. The EIR Fails to Properly Evaluate and Mitigate the Project ’s Hydrology Impacts

1. The Project Improperly Relies on Regu latory Compliance and to Support that an Environmental Effect is Less than Significant
The Project improperly relies on regulatory compliance to reduce the potential for environmental effects. For example, the DEIR states that “{c]ompliance with existing regulations would prevent violation of water quality standards and minimize the potential for contributing sources of polluted runoff. Therefore, compliance with existing regulations would ensure that the Project would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface quality from demolition and construction activities. Impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required.” DEIR, p. 4.8-15.

Further, the DEIR states that “{a]s a result of compliance with existing regulations, the Project would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality during the long-term Project operations. Impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required.” DEIR, p. 4.8-17.

According to the DEIR:

With compliance with applicable regulations, the proposed Project does not include any facilities or land uses that could generate pollutants that could result in substantial water quality impacts. As discussed in Threshold

3.8(a), compliance with the City’s Stormwater Management requirements

would protect the water quality of wate rcourses in a manner pursuant to and consistent with the Federal Clean Water Act, and pursuant to the

City of Arcadia – Alexan Mixed-Use Development Project
April 11May 10, 2022

and consistent with the Federal Clean Water Act, and pursuant to the NPDES CGP No. 2009-0009-DWQ. Restrictions in this Ordinance are applicable to both construction activities and operations. Additionally, compliance with CGP issued by the SWRCB would require implementation of BMPs during construction to address the potential for pollutants from entering downstream waters. The Project’s potential to violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requir ements or otherwise substantially degrade surface water or ground water quality would be less than significant and no mitigation is required.

DEIR, p. 4.8-19.

The improper reliance on regulatory compliance extends to all other Project’s impacts. For example, relating to noise
imapctsimpacts, the DEIR states that “the
proposed Project would comply with existing noise regulations and restrictions designated for the Project site and no noise mitigation would be required.” (DEIR, p.

4.9-40). And “[t]he proposed Project would comply with existing regulations governing noise and no noise mitigation would be required.” DEIR, p. 4.9-41.

Relying on mere consistency with regulatory standards, the EIR conclude in many instances that the Project’s impacts are less than significant, and that no mitigation is required.

However, it is established that, “[c]ompliance with the law is not enough to support a finding of no significant impact under . . . CEQA.” Californians for Alternatives to Toxics v.

Department of Food & Agriculture (2005) 136 Cal. App. 4th 1, 15 – 17 (finding that a lead agency “abused its discretion by relying on DPR's regulatory scheme as a substitute for performing its own evaluation of the environmental impacts of using pesticides.”).

Bare conclusions or opinions of the agency are not sufficient to satisfy an agency’s obligation under CEQA to adequately support their environmental determinations.

Laurel Heights Improvement Assn. v. Regents of University of California (1988) 47 Cal. 3d 376, 403 – 404. “To facilitate CEQA's informational role, the EIR must contain facts and analysis, not just the agency's bare conclusions or opinions. . . . [to] enable[] the decision-makers and the public to make an ‘independent, reasoned judgment’ about a proposed project.” Concerned Citizens of Costa Mesa, Inc. v. 32nd Dist. Agricultural Assn. (1986) 42 Cal.3d 929, 935 (quoting Santiago County Water Dist. v. County of Orange (1981) 118 Cal.App.3d 818, 831).

City of Arcadia – Alexan Mixed-Use Development Project
April 11May 10, 2022

As the Court noted in East Sacramento Partnerships for a Livable City v. City of Sacramento (2016) 5 Cal. App. 5th 281, 301, compliance with a regulatory scheme “in and of itself does not insulate a project from the EIR requirement, where it may be fairly argued that the project will generate significant environmental effects.” (Internal quotations omitted.) A project's effects can be significant even if they are not greater than those deemed acceptable in a general plan or other regulatory law. Gentry v. City of Murrieta (1995) 36 Cal.App.4th 1359, 1416; see also Keep Our Mountains Quiet v. County of Santa Clara (2015) 236 Cal.App.4th 714, 732 (finding that a full environmental impact report is required “if substantial evidence supports a fair argument that the Project may have significant unmitigated noise impacts, even if other evidence shows the Project will not generate noise in excess of the County's noise ordinance and general plan.”).)
A public agency cannot apply a threshold of significance or regulatory standard “in a way that forecloses the consideration of any other substantial evidence showing there may be a significant effect.” Mejia v. City of Los Angeles (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 322, 342.

Where comments from a responsible sister agency, such as the Water District, disclose new or conflicting data or opinions that cause concern that the agency may not have fully evaluated the project and its alternatives, these comments may not simply be ignored based on a conclusory statement about compliance with regulatory standards; there must be a good faith, reasoned analysis. Berkeley Keep Jets Over the Bay Com. v. Board of Port Cmrs. (2001) 91 Cal. App. 4th 1344, 1367. The District’s approach fails to meet its obligation to engage in good faith reasoned analysis to provide the public, public agencies and decisionmakers with detailed information about the effects that the Project will have on the environment, ways to mitigate those effects, as well as alternatives. PRC § 21061.

An agency must “explain how the particular requirements of that environmental standard reduce project impacts, including cumulative impacts, to a level that is less that significant, and why the environmental standard is relevant to the analysis of a project that is less than significant. CEQA Guidelines § 15067.7.

The City’s reliance on compliance with regulations does not obviate the need for further analysis of environmental impacts, nor does compliance with regulations provide any substantial evidence that the Project will not have significant environmental impacts. The courts have held that compliance with regulations alone

is insufficient to conclude that a project will not have significant environmental impacts.

City of Arcadia – Alexan Mixed-Use Development Project
April 11May 10, 2022

The CityCity’s reliance on the Project’s anticipated compliance does not provide any substantial evidence that the Project will not have significant environmental impacts.

Therefore, the EIR must be revised to properly mitigate the Project’s Hydrology impacts.

2. The EIR also fails to Adequately Evaluate and Mitigate the Project’s Environmental Impacts Because the EIR Compresses the Analysis of Impacts and Mitigation Measures into a Single Issue.

CEQA requires a lead agency to consider a proposed project, evaluate its environmental impacts and, if significant impacts are identified, to describe feasible mitigation measures to reduce the impacts. Failure to evaluate the effect of these measures in the impact analysis violates the legal requirement to provide a logical argument, supported by substantial evidence, for each impact conclusion in an environmental document Lotus v. Department of Transportation, (2014) 223 Cal.App.4th 645.

The court explained, "[s]imply stating there will be no significant impacts because the project incorporates 'special construction techniques' is not adequate or permissible." (Ibid.) and this "short-cutting of CEQA requirements ... precludes both identification of potential environmental consequences arising from the project and also thoughtful analysis of the sufficiency of measures to mitigate those consequences." (Ibid.)
For example, as discussed above, the EIR Compressed the Analysis of the Project’s Hydrology and Noise Impacts and their Mitigation Measures into a Single Issues.

By compressing the analysis of impacts and mitigation measures into a single issue, the EIR disregards the requirements of CEQA.

III. CONCLUSION

The Southwest Carpenters request that the City revise and recirculate the Project’s environmental impact report to address the aforementioned concerns. If the City has any questions or concerns, feel free to contact my Office.

City of Arcadia – Alexan Mixed-Use Development Project
May 10, 2022

Sincerely,
Mitchell M. Tsai
Attorneys for the Southwest
Regional Council of Carpenters

City of Arcadia – Alexan Mixed-Use Development Project
April 11, 2022

Attached:

March 8, 2021 SWAPE Letter to Mitchell M. Tsai re Local Hire Requirements and Considerations for Greenhouse Gas Modeling (Exhibit A);

Air Quality and GHG Expert Paul Rosenfeld CV (Exhibit B); and Air Quality and GHG Expert Matt Hagemann CV (Exhibit C).

Downtown Arcadia Improvement Association
P.O. Box 661960, Arcadia, CA 91066

6/15/2022
City of Arcadia City Council
240 W. Huntington Dr.

Arcadia, CA 91007

Dear Arcadia City Council,

The Downtown Arcadia Improvement Association (“DAIA”) would like to formally offer our acknowledgement and full approval for the future multi-family residential development project to be located at 150 N. Santa Anita Ave, in the city of Arcadia, to be named the Alexan Arcadia.

As prominent representatives of the main economic commercial thoroughfare of the City of Arcadia, located along the primary central corridor of Huntington Avenue and 1 st Avenue, the DAIA acknowledges that this
development is expected to greatly affect each and every one of our commercial businesses. We very much look forward to seeing this development occur as it will provide for an increase in the local downtown Arcadia population which is expected to inject new capital into the local economy.

Based on our knowledge of the developer, Trammel Crow Residential, we believe them to be a very competent developer known for producing residential developments of a very high quality. As this directly affects us and the image that we also want to portray, we find this developer to be the right choice for our first major downtown development in many years.

Additionally, we would like to offer our full support to Positive Investments on this development. Positive Investments has been located within the City of Arcadia for their entire 45+ years of operation and they are a “positive” influence on our entire community. They have been involved not only as property owners within the City of Arcadia, but also as community leaders specifically as members of the DAIA.

In summary, the Downtown Arcadia Improvement Association formally approves this development.

Thank you,

Sincerely,

Martin Gandell, President
Downtown Arcadia Improvement Association