Attachment 3 cont.
Restaurants in Village Core Downtown
Restaurants Branch Street
Arroyo Grande Meat Co. 120 E Branch 5t
Alphy' s Broiler 130- A W. Branch St
Branch Street Deli 203 E, Branch St
Cafe Andreini 131 E Branch 5t
Doc Bernstein' s 144 W. Branch St
Eclair Bakery 117 E Branch St
EI Taco Loco 105 E Branch 5t
Gina's Italian Cuisine 138 E Branch $ t
Old Village Grill 101 E. Branch St
Village Cafe 112 E Branch St
Bridge Street
Klondike Cafe 104 Bridge St
Retail in the Village Mixed UselHistoric Character Overlay D-2.4 The Green Vase 200 Nelson 5t.
Castle Tapestry 134 Nelson 5t.
Bridge Street House 132 Bridge St.
Affairs of the Heart 146 Traffic Way
At a Glance Antiques 410 E. Branch St.
Chameleon 415 E Branch St.
United Green Mark 200 Traffic Way
Restaurants in the Village Mixed Use/ Historic Character Overlay D-2.4 Mcclintocks Saloon & Dining House 133 Bridge 5t
Thai Kitchen 161 Traffic Way
ATTACHMENT 4
Examples of businesses and requirements under the formula business ordinance FOl'ml.ml
bti~ iHess
Bath and Nationwide chain w/tradename Yes Not Permitted Body Works and standardized service NP)
Tio Alberto' s Community fastfood restaurant No Minor Use with 5 stores, w/tradename and Permit ( MUP)
standardized service
Border's Nationwide chain w/tradename Yes NP
and standardized signs and
service
Jamba Juice Nationwide chain w/tradename Yes NP
and standardized signs and
service
Peet's Nationwide chain w/ tradename Yes NP
Coffee and standardized signs and
service
Cookie Community grocery with 2 No MUP if <
Crock stores 20,000 sq. ft.
Market otherwise NP
Cold Stone Nationwide franchise Yes NP
Creamery w/tradename and standardized
signs and service
Ann' s Community business with 2 No Permitted ( P)
Clothing locations if <5,000 sq.
ft., MUP if
5001 sq. ft. -
19,999 sq. ft.
and NP >
20,000 sq. ft.
Gap Nationwide chain w/tradename Yes NP
and standardized signs and
service
New Specialty grocery market with 5 No MUP if <
Frontier' s store locations 20, 000 sq. ft.
Market otherwise NP
Copelands Corporate store w/locations in 4 Yes NP
Sports states w/trademark and
standardized signs, uniforms
and service
Restoration Corporate store w/over 100 Yes NP
Hardware locations w/trademark and
standardized signs and service
The Habit Fast food restaurant that started Yes NP
ATTACHMENT 4
Formula "
business
burgers, in Goleta and now has 15 stores
etc) w/ standardized menus and
service
Hallmark International corporation Yes NP
Cards w/ trademark and standardized
signs and service
Texaco gas International corporation Yes NP
station w/trademark and standardized
signs and service
I
I JUl- 6- 2005 10: 20 FROM: AGA
8054892239 TO: 4' 1
1 ATTACHMENT 5 i c 1
I
I
C{'/,o'y
C
J0' ....,~
ARROYO GRANDE
0 0 & ; 0 VALL~ t'..,, p~ ;> ooj" .
Chamber of Commerce b~O '
Q~
Positioned
March 24. 2005 0,0-% ~b~
for Mayor Tony Ferrara and City Cciuncilmen
1')'
Progress city of Arroyo Grande
P. 0, Box 550
Arroyo Grande. Ca 93421
Dear Mayor FeiTara and City Councilmen,
Please accept this latter as an Indication of our concem regarding a potential ordinance ( as noted In the San Luis Obispo County Tribune and The Coast News) which would restrict andfor prohibit certain types of businesses from locating Into specific districts in Arroyo Grande.
The Board of Directors of the Arroyo Grande Chamber of Commerce is very concemed with this proposed ordinance.
We believe that if a business complies with all City regulations. including zoning, permits, and architect and design guidelines, the business should not be discrimInated against nor prohibited from establishing their business,
Regardless of whether a business Is 'locally owned or a locally owned
franchise, the benefits to the community are great. Each provide employment, occupy otherwise empty space. maintain real estate values, contribute to the community, conlribute to the tax, base, and provide diversity to our City. When business Is encouraged and . successful the whole community thrives- adding desirability and overall economic vitality,
We feel the current guidelines, laws, and regulations affecting business are sufficient and do not see the need for Increased restrictions In Arroyo Grande. This proposed ordinance would discourage rather than encourag~ ~ uslness.
We are happy to have an informal discussion with you any time to exchange Information and points of view. We appreciate any opportunity to meet with you.
Sincerely,
SOOW. l\nnch
Krista Kodl, Chairman of the Board
AnojO Grande,
CaliCemla 93. 20
80S) . 89. H88
h' ( 80S)i89. 22J9
UJ"$l-.&..<<. can
q,a.,
JOHN HAYASHI
2460 GRACIA WAY i..'_
Ie;; !-l:)
ARROYO GRANDE, CA 93420
805-489-6112
July 26, 2005
To: The Arroyo Grande City Council Members
Re: .July 26, 2005 City Council Meeting
The Formula Business Restriction Policy
Request: Please read this letter into the minutes of the .July 26, 2005 City Council Meeting.
Dear Council Members,
Our family owns commercial property in Arroyo Grande and we oppose any local ordinance that would restrict certain types of businesses from locating into specific districts within Arroyo Grande.
We support the Arroyo Grande Chamber of Commerce's position opposing The Formula Business Restriction Policy.
Sincerely,
C~ Ci~ Cw~ l
Ci~ M~ et'
Ci~ AHomt.<f
DIYU.-\ 1w' of- Co"' M~
C.i~ (..{~~
Asicc.. Pk/.AIn&f'
11u.\oC Page 213 of 226
q.a.
July 26, 2005
l C: t; ()
City of Arroyo Grande
214 E. Branch Street
Arroyo Grande, California 93420
Subject: Proposed Ordinance, Formula Businesses, Village of Arroyo Grande Honorable Mayor and Members ofthe City Council:
My name is Howard Mankins with a
family business and property in the Village. The
property is located at 123- 131 Branch Street.
I am unable to be at the hearing scheduled for tonight, so am briefly putting my feelings concerning this proposed ordnance in this letter.
While I am not familiar with specific parts of the proposed Ordinance, I do not believe it is in the true spirit ofthe free American Enterprise System to restrict a property owners ability to rent to any legitimate business. Competition is good for everyone.
Arroyo Grande has been made the way it is by the freedom of choice oftenants, and so far it has worked. We have a
thriving business district. Most owners would,not oppose general suggestions or guidelines, An Ordinance we do not need.
I have seen the times' when half ofthe buildings on, Branch Street had signs, FOR RENT in the windows. In a situation like this, which will happen again, it places an unnecessary burden on any property owner to rent to a new business.
Most property owners, I don't believe want to destroy what we have worked so hard to make, into an historic shopping center.
New additions to the village are carefully going through a building process, that protects the character ofthe village, because enough restrictions are already on the books.
The building cost today and fee requirements, studies, and time to construct, all add up to higher rents for tenants. That is what we need to worry about. High rents lead to high vacancies. This leads to new and desperate tenant selection by landlords.
I like the method, where options and guidelines are given and voluntary selection is given to those who pay the bill. No tenant or landlord is going to do anything that will distract 2l consumer from shopping in his or her place ofbusiness.
Please to not pass another ordnance for the Village which is contrary to the, AmeriCl!i1 Free Enterprise System. Property owners do not need this to keep the Village as it is. e\ Cl~ Counc.il
you very
Cl M~ U'" rout '
Ci""1
M\om"' f
oward & Aileen Mankins
l>trec.*w o.f eM- DW
C6~ ClerkAm~,.Pl~~
1cc" Page 214 of 226
RECEIVED
JUL show€~
2 6 2005
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
MANFERD JENNINGS SHOWER
ANITA SHOWER COMMUNITY DEVElOPMENT 867 North 6th Street Grover City, California 93433 U. S. A.
805/ 489. 9696
July 24, 2005
Rob Strong, City ofArroyo Grande.
P. O. Box 550
Arroyo Grande, Ca 93421- 0550
Dear Mr. Strong:
My husband and I own 320 East Branch Street and 404 East Branch Street in the Village of Arroyo Grande, California. We read the newspaperand. know ofthe rumors of Starbucks' wishes to descend upon our Village' character and personality. We are aware that someone wants to disrupt what we have in the Village for the sake and fattening oftheir own bank: account. . Weare absolutely opposed to any ofthis action.
We are in favor ofkeeping the name brand stores and namebrand.specialty shops, out ofthe Village and the surrounding area. There isn' t anything written in a national or worldwide coffee company leases that limits them to just selling coffee, cups and accessories. It would not surprise us ifStarbucks suddenly started selling greeting cards, sandwiches ts, fudge, bakery products, casual throws, their own b of beer and wine, an fresh vegetable or two as well as ice cream from If own privately-held farms. this became reality the City of Arroyo e would hear from Andreini' s, the Bc ir Bakery, Brisco' s, the apery, The Last Chance Liquor Store and li, the Village Salon, the Village Fudge Factory, Chameleon, Ralph & Duane' Lund' s, all ofthe people who are responsible for our first-class Farmer' s Mark and from the ' good doctor' of Dr. Burstein' s Ice Cream Lab.
Keep the Vill ge special ok beyond the blue prints.
ANITA SHO
IAS
WdCityofAG072405
RECEIVED
I" _
Michael T. Clark
i'.ulJ u 2 7005
456 Carpenter Canyon CITY OF Af~ROYO GRANDE
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 COMMUNiTY DEVElOPMENT
July 29, 200S
Arroyo Grande City Council
214 E. Branch
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
Dear City Council:
I
just read the Tribune article regarding chain stores in the Village. Please keep the chain stores out. If you let one in you open the doors to the fast food giants and goodbye to the quaint Village we love. Ifpeople want chain stores they can drive to the Rancho Grande shopping center and shop Wal Mart, Albertsons, Trader Joes , Baja Fresh and Office Max in one convient location with acres ofparking. I'll walk to the Village and have breakfast at the Village Cafe. After breakfast, I'll stop at JJ' s for some groceries.
Please approve the ordinance to block "formula businesses" in the Village.
Sincerely,
Michael
V1{ t---
T. Clark -
Michael C. Bondello
OJ;, '~-:~ 01
207 McKinley St.
Ii /. , Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
I '_ ,_
28 July 2005
Tony Ferrara, Mayor
City Council
215 E. Branch St.
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
Dear Mr. Ferrara:
I am writing to remind you that the while the four speakers who were in favor ofthe proposed ordinance restricting formula businesses in the Village Core Downtown and Village Mixed Use/Historic Character will not be in attendance at the August 9th City Council meeting, we would like our opinions to be cited in the record for that evening.
I am afraid that too many ofthe proponents ofthis ordinance will be absent from this meeting, so it will quite likely appear to be a one-sided display ofopposition to the proposed ordinance.
Ifthis does develop, please remind the audience that the proponents are on record as being strongly in favor ofthis ordinance.
Thank you for your consideration ofthis request.
Sincerely,
j/~cl3~
Michael C. Bondello
i
I
J
8.j.
MEMORANDUM
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROB STRONG, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT D1RECTO~
J
BY: TERESA MCCLISH, ASSOCIATE PLANNE~
SUBJECT: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO
GRANDE AMENDING ARROYO GRANDE MUNICIPAL CODE
CHAPTERS 16.04 AND 16.36 OF TITLE 16 TO DEFINE FORMULA
BUSINESSES AND RESTRICT FORMULA BUSINESSES IN THE
VILLAGE CORE DOWNTOWN AND VILLAGE MIXED USE/HISTORIC
CHARACTER OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS ( DEVELOPMENT CODE
AMENDMENT 05-009)
DATE: AUGUST 23, 2005
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the City Council adopt an ordinance to amend Title 16, defining and regulating formula businesses in the Village Core Downtown ( VCO) and Village Mixed Use (VMU) districts within the Historic Character Overlay ( 0- 2.4).
FUNDING:
No funding impact.
DISCUSSION:
On March 8, 2005, in response to public comment at the City Council hearing of February 22, 2005, the Council directed . staff to research alternatives on formula business restrictions in the Village commercial area. Staff reported alternatives to the Council on April 26, 2005, and the Council introduced the proposed ordinance on August 9, 2005.
Proposed Ordinance
The proposed ordinance includes an addition to Chapter 16. 04 to define a formula business, as well as an amendment to Chapter 16.36 prohibiting formula businesses in the VCO and VMU/ HCO districts as depicted below.
The proposed ordinance adds the following definition to Section 16.04.070:
Formula business". Shall mean a business, limited to retail trade uses and restaurants, that is required by contractual or other arrangement to maintain standardized services and the same or similar name, tradename, or trademark which causes it to be I
ATTACHMENT 4
CITY COUNCIL
DCA 05~ 09: REGULATION OF FORMULA BUSINESSES
AUGUST 23, 2005
PAGE 2
substantially identical to six (6) or more other establishments, regardless of ownership or location, and which satisfies one of the following two criteria:
a. It has exterior design or architecture, signs, decor or similar features in a style which is distinctive to and standardized among the chain or group:
b. It is a fast food restaurant.
The regulation of formula business is proposed to include an amendment to Section
16.36.030(A) as follows:
Zoning
Village Core Downtown D- 2. 4 ( VCD D- 2.4)
Village Mixed- Use D- 2.4 ( VMU 0-2.4)
I
i
I
I
Zoning Districts Affected by Formula Business Restrictions Table 16. 36.030IA)
G. SPECIAL USES
Land Use IMU TMU VCD VMU GMU FOMU HMU OMU RC Specific
D- 2. 11 D2. 20) Use
HCO D- 2.4} Standards
Formula Permit NP NP Permit reQuired as identified
business reQuired as in D- bv underlvinQland use
identified 2. 4
Qy
underlvinll
S:\ COMMUN ITY _ DEVELOPMENTlPROJ ECTS\ DCA\05-009 Formula Business\ ccsr082305. doc I
CITY COUNCIL
DCA 05-009: REGULATION OF FORMULA BUSINESSES
AUGUST 23, 2005
PAGE 3
I I
land use I I I I I
This proposal adds a new land use category to the section describing " Uses Permitted Within Mixed Use and Commercial Districts". There is no proposed prohibition or restriction of formula businesses outside of the VCD or VMU/ HCO districts.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
A public notice was sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the Village Core Downtown and Village Mixed Use districts and a public notice was placed in the Tribune.
Twelve letters were received from individuals regarding the proposal and included in the staff report at the August 9, 2005 public hearing. Public comment was received at the July 5, 2005 Planning Commission public hearing, and the City CoulJcil public hearings of July 26, and August 9, 2005.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT:
Staff has reviewed this project in compliance with the Califomia Environmental Quality Act, and has found that the proposal is exempt pursuant to Sections 15183, 15305, 15378, 15061( b)( 3) of the Guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA) and Public Resources Code section 21083.3( e).
ALTERNATIVES:
The following alternatives are provided for City Council consideration:
1. Adopt the ordinance;
2. Modify and adopt the ordinance;
3. Do not adopt the ordinance;
4. Provide direction to staff.
I
S:ICOMMUNITY _ DEVELOPMENTlPROJECTSIDCAI05- 009 Formula BusinesslccsrOB2305. doc I
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE AMENDING ARROYO GRANDE MUNICIPAL
CODE CHAPTERS 16.04 AND 16.36 OF TITLE 16 TO DEFINE
FORMULA BUSINESSES AND RESTRICT FORMULA
BUSINESSES IN THE VILLAGE CORE DOWNTOWN AND
VILLAGE MIXED USE/HISTORIC CHARACTER OVERLAY
DISTRICTS ( DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 05-009)
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted the updated General Plan which became effective October 9, 2001 and requires preservation of the City' s unique identity and rural character; and
WHEREAS, the City Council amended Title 16 of the Municipal Code (Development Code) in 2003 and 2004 for Mixed Use and Commercial districts to implement policies in the General Plan and establish regulations to encourage the specific character of each zoning district, including the Village Core Downtown (VCD) and Village Mixed Use (VMU) districts that are within the City' s Historic Character Overlay District D- 2.4 ( HCO).
WHEREAS, the HCO is intended to "identify, promote, preserve and protect the historic, cultural, and/ or architectural resource values and encourage compatible uses and architectural design".
WHEREAS, the VCD and VMU districts have historical architecture and small individualized shops and restaurants, that provides an important destination for both tourists and members of the community; and
WHEREAS, the continued vitality of the City' s economy is dependent upon tourism and upon the ability of the City' s historic district to attract both residents and visitors; and WHEREAS, the City has a responsibility to assure adherence to the General Plan and Development Code in meeting the needs and desires of the residents and the community and preserve the characteristics which make the City unique and desirable as a place in which to live and which to visit, and prevent the loss of the rural and historical character that is a particular resource of the VCD and VMU districts; and WHEREAS, the potential proliferation of "formula" businesses may diminish the unique character of the VCD and VMU districts by offering standardization of architecture, interior design and d' cor, uniforms and the like, and which are required to be virtually identical to other such business in other communities; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of ArroyC? Grande considered Development Code Amendment 05-009 at a duly noticed public hearing on July 5, 2005 in accordance with the Development Code of the City of Arroyo Grande, made revisions, and recommended approval to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered the information and public testimony presented at the public hearing of July 26, 2005, Planning Commission
ORDINANCE NO.
PAGE 2
recommendations,' staff reports, and all other information and documents that are part of the public record; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds, after due study, deliberation and public hearing, the following circumstances exist:
A. The proposed amendments to Title 16 of the Municipal Code are consistent with the goals, objectives, policies and programs of the General Plan since the goal of the Land Use Element and Economic Development Element is to promote the development of a well balanced and functional mix of land uses and to ensure that development in the City is consistent with the City' s character and image. The proposed amendment is necessary and desirable to implement the provisions of the General Plan by maintaining the development and identity of the City' s small-town rural character specifically in the historical and agricultural setting of the Village Downtown Core and Village Mixed Use districts that are within the City' s Historic Character Overlay district.
B. The proposed amendments to Title 16 of the Municipal Code would include a new land use category, formula businesses" and specify which districts such. businesses are permitted and the level of permit review required. Formula businesses" are proposed to be prohibited in the VCD and VMU/ HCO ( 0- 2.4) combining district in order to preserve the historic character of the downtown portion of the Village.
C. The proposed amendments to Title 16 will not adversely affect the public health, safety, and welfare or result in an illogical land use pattern since the development of retail establishments that conflict with the character of the City' s historic district, and that are out of scale in relation to the current pattern of development in such districts creates a threat to the public health, safety, and general welfare by threatening the character.
D. The proposed amendments to Title 16 of the Municipal Code are consistent with the purpose and intent otTitle 16, specifically, Sections 16. 36. 020( C), 16. 36. 020( 0) and
16.36. 020( J) pertaining to the VCD, VMU and Historic Overlay Districts.
E. The City has conducted environmental review for adoption of an ordinance amend Chapters 16. 04 and 16.36 of the Municipal Code, and has found that it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendments will have an effect on the environment and therefore this project is exempt from the provisions of CEQA, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15378, .15061 (b)( 3), 15183, 15305, and Public Resources Code section 21083.3( e) for the following reasons:
1. Under CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 (b)( 3), CEQA review is not required because there is no possibility that this Ordinance may have a significant effect upon the environment.
i
I
I
i
I
ORDINANCE NO.
PAGE 3
2. Under CEQA Guidelines Section 15378, the proposed amendments are not a project under CEQA because they will not cause a " direct physical change in the environment" and will not authorize any specific development activity.
3. Any potential indirect secondary impacts of the proposed amendments on the physical environment are speculative and are not reasonably foreseeable, and are, therefore, not subject to review under CEQA.
4. There is no substantial evidence that the proposed amendments will have the potential to cause a significant impact upon the environment.
5. There is no substantiated opinion or reasonable argument to determine that the proposed amendments will cause impacts that are subject to review under CEQA.
6. The proposed text amendments constitute a minor alteration in a land use limitation under CEQA Guidelines Section 15305, and such a land use limitation is a permissible exercise of the city' s zoning powers.
7. There are no unusual circumstances that would necessitate CEQA review.
8. Under CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 and Public Resources Code section 21083.3(e), the proposed regulations are consistent with the City of Arroyo Grande General Plan. The following General Plan policies support adoption of the ordinance:
Objective LU6- The Historic Village Core (VC) area shall be sustained, enhanced and expanded as the symbolic, functional and unique business center of the City, with diverse mixed uses emphasizing pedestrian- oriented activities and providing for the needs of residents and tourists.
Policy LU6- 1 - Designate the historic downtown area as Village Core (VC). The primary purpose of the area designated VC is to provide for the continuation and development of commercial, office, residential, recreational and community facility land use types that reflect and are compatible with the historic, small town nature of the original Arroyo Grande Village area.
Policy ED2-4 - Continue to balance economic goals with strong policies and programs that promote and maintain the community' s environment, quality of life, and rural character.
Policy ED4-4 - Maintain and enhance the Village Core as a focal point for civic and tourist activities
Implementation Policy ED4- 1. 5 - Work with the Village Improvement Association to preserve its historic function as the City' s commercial and cultural center.
Implementation Policy ED7- 1. 2 - Establish clear City standards and thresholds of acceptability for new developments.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande, as follows:
ORDINANCE NO.
PAGE 4
SECTION 1: The above recitals and findings are true and correct.
SECTION 2: Arroyo Grande Municipal Code Section 16.04 is hereby amended by adding the following definition to Section 16. 04.070( C):
FFormula business". Shall mean a business, limited to retail trade uses and restaurants, that is required by contractual or other arrangement to maintain standardized services and the same or similar name, tradename, or trademark which causes it to be substantially identical to six (6) or more other establishments, regardless of ownership or location, and which satisfies one of the following two criteria:
a. It has exterior design or architecture, signs, decor or similar features in a style which is distinctive to and standardized among the chain or group:
b. It is a fast food restaurant.
SECTION 3: Arroyo Grande Municipal Code Table 16.36.030(A), subsection G. Retail Trade is hereby added to include the following land use categories:
Table 16. 36.030(A)
D. RETAIL TRADE
Land Use IMU TMU VCO VMU GMU FOMU HMU OMU RC Specific
0-2. 11 02. 20) Use
HCO 0- 2.4) Standards
Formula Permit NP NP Permit reQuired as identified bv
business reQuired as For D - underlvinQ land use
identified 2.4
underlvina
land use
SECTION 4: If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, or clause of this Ordinance or any part thereof is for any reason held to be unlawful, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, or clause thereof, irrespective of the fact that anyone or more section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, or clause be declared unconstitutional.
SECTION 4: A summary of this Ordinance shall be published in a newspaper published and circulated in the City of Arroyo Grande at least five ( 5) days prior to the City Council meeting at which the proposed Ordinance is to be adopted. A certified copy of the full text of the proposed Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the Director of Administrative Services/City Clerk. Within fifteen ( 15) days after adoption of the Ordinance, the summary with the names of those City Council Members voting for and against the Ordinance shall be published again, and the Director of Administrative Services/City Clerk shall post a certified copy of the full text of such adopted Ordinance.
SECTION 5: This Ordinance shall take effect thirty ( 30) days after its adoption.
ORDINANCE NO.
PAGE 5
On motion by Council Member seconded by Council Member and by the following roll call vote to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
the foregoing Ordinance was adopted this day of
ORDINANCE NO.
PAGE 6
TONYFERRARA, MAYOR
ATTEST:
KELLY WETMORE, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
STEVEN ADAMS, CITY MANAGER
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
TIMOTHY J. CARMEL, CITY ATTORNEY