Atherton City Council
November 16, 2022

AGENDA PACKET
Town of Atherton
City Council
NOVEMBER 16,2022
REGULAR MEETING
6:00 PM.

This meeting is being held virtually and in­person
Council Chambers
80 Fair Oaks Lane
Atherton, CA 94027
This meeting is being held via teleconference pursuant to Government Code section 54953(e) (1)(B) and in compliance with the Brown Act.  Section 54953(e)(1)(B) permits the Town to hold a meeting during a proclaimed state of emergency via teleconference in order to determine whether as a result of the emergency meeting in person would present an imminent risk to attendees' health or safety.   The meeting will be held by tele or video conferencing.

The public may participate via: Zoom Meeting.

For a live meeting broadcast you can watch the Council meeting on: Comcast Subscribers Channel 29 or via Midpen Media website here: https://midpenmedia.org/local­tv/watch­now/ Join Zoom Meeting:

One tap mobile: 1 6699006833,,506897786#
US (San Jose)
Dial by your location: 1 669 900 6833 US (San
Jose)
Meeting ID: 506 897 786
Weblink: https://zoom.us/j/506897786
Remote Public Comments:

Meeting participants are encouraged to submit
public comments in writing in advance of the
meeting. The following email will be monitored
during the meeting and public comments will be
documented for the record.

Email: [email protected]
This Agenda may not reflect the actual order of items.  The order of items is subject to change based on Council action.
6:00 P.M. REGULAR MEETING
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL – Polito, Hawkins­Manuelian, Lewis, Vice Mayor Widmer, Mayor DeGolia PUBLIC COMMENTS – Public Comments can be teleconferenced or emailed directly to the City Clerk, Anthony Suber at [email protected]
(This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the Council on any matter not on the Agenda that is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council. State law prohibits the Council from acting on items not listed on the Agenda except by special action of the City Council under specified circumstances. Speakers’ time is limited to three minutes. Additionally,

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL – Polito, Hawkins­Manuelian, Lewis, Vice Mayor Widmer, Mayor DeGolia PUBLIC COMMENTS – Public Comments can be teleconferenced or emailed directly to the City Clerk, Anthony Suber at [email protected]
(This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the Council on any matter not on the Agenda that is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council. State law prohibits the Council from acting on items not listed on the Agenda except by special action of the City Council under specified circumstances. Speakers’ time is limited to three minutes. Additionally, the public may address the Council on any subject listed on the Consent and Regular Agenda.

Each speaker may address the Council once for a limit of three minutes.)

PRESENTATIONS
Introduction of Rachael Londer, Management Analyst II
Swearing­In Sgt. Magami
Audio Demonstration
Atherton Library Annual Report
DEPARTMENTAL WRITTEN REPORTS
Discussion: The Departmental Reports include written reports from the Town’s various Departments.

Staff is present to answer any questions the Council may have on the various issues noted in the written Reports. The Council may ask questions and discuss any of the various items.

November 2022 Monthly Departmental Reports
CONSENT CALENDAR (Items 1 – 9)

1. BILLS AND CLAIMS REPORT FOR OCTOBER 2022
Report: ROBERT BARRON II, FINANCE DIRECTOR
Recommendation: Staff recommends a review of the monthly report.

Description: This is a routine report to review the bills and claims from October 2022.

2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM OCTOBER 19 AND NOVEMBER 2, 2022.

Report: ANTHONY SUBER, CITY CLERK
Recommendation: Approve minutes for October 19, 2022 and November 2, 2022.

Description: This is a routine item to approve meeting minutes from the City Council.

3. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER

15.19 OF THE ATHERTON MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADOPTING THE 2022 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING CODE AND AN EV CHARGING AND ALL ELECTRIFICATION REACH CODES, WITH EXCEPTIONS
Report:MIKEGREENLEECHIEFBUILDINGOFFICIAL

Description: This is a routine report to review the bills and claims from October 2022.

2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM OCTOBER 19 AND NOVEMBER 2, 2022.

Report: ANTHONY SUBER, CITY CLERK
Recommendation: Approve minutes for October 19, 2022 and November 2, 2022.

Description: This is a routine item to approve meeting minutes from the City Council.

3. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER

15.19 OF THE ATHERTON MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADOPTING THE 2022 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING CODE AND AN EV CHARGING AND ALL ELECTRIFICATION REACH CODES, WITH EXCEPTIONS
Report: MIKE GREENLEE, CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL
Recommendation: Adopt the ordinance amending Chapter 15.19 of the Atherton Municipal Code by adopting the 2022 California Green Building Code and an EV Charging and All Electrification Reach Codes with exceptions. Direct the Building Official to file the amendments with State of California as required by law.

Description: This is the second and final reading of the ordinance for adoption, it will go into effect after 30 days.

4. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND TITLE 15 OF THE ATHERTON MUNICIPAL CODE ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE 2022 CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS CODE, RETAINING EXISTING
MODIFICATIONS.

Report: MIKE GREENLEE, CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL
Recommendation: Adopt the ordinance amending Title 15 of the Atherton Municipal Code and direct the Building Official to file the amendments with State of California as required by law.

Description: This is the second reading and adoption of an Ordiance to amend the Town's Municipal Code related to Building Codes and Fire Codes by reference.

5. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION RATIFYING PROCLAMATION OF A STATE OF EMERGENCY IN THE TOWN AND AUTHORIZING TELECONFERENCE MEETINGS OF TOWN LEGISLATIVE BODIES PURSUANT TO THE BROWN ACT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54953(E)
Report: GEORGE RODERICKS, CITY MANAGER
Recommendation: It is recommended that the Town Council adopt the attached Resolution No. 22­XX, finding a proclamation of the state of emergency to apply within the Town, conditions of which pose an imminent threat to the health and safety to attendees of in­person public meetings, and authorizing teleconference meetings of Town legislative bodies pursuant to Government Code section 54953(e).

Description: The City Council will certify that the COVID­19 Emergency protocols are still required and the emergency continues.

6. ACCEPTANCE OF TREASURER’S REPORT FOR THE FIRST QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2022
Report: ROBERT BARRON III, FINANCE DIRECTOR
Recommendation: Accept the Treasurer’s Report for the fourth Quarter Ended September 30, 2022.

Description: This will be a Council review and discussion of the Treasurer’s Report which provides an update on the cash and investment position of the Town of Atherton.

7. ACCEPTANCE OF WORK AND AUTHORIZATION TO RECORD NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE HOLBROOK­PALMER TENNIS COURT OVERLAY PROJECT (COURTS 1 AND 2)

6. ACCEPTANCE OF TREASURER’S REPORT FOR THE FIRST QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2022
Report: ROBERT BARRON III, FINANCE DIRECTOR
Recommendation: Accept the Treasurer’s Report for the fourth Quarter Ended September 30, 2022.

Description: This will be a Council review and discussion of the Treasurer’s Report which provides an update on the cash and investment position of the Town of Atherton.

7. ACCEPTANCE OF WORK AND AUTHORIZATION TO RECORD NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE HOLBROOK­PALMER TENNIS COURT OVERLAY PROJECT (COURTS 1 AND 2)
Report: SALLY BENTZ­DALTON, TOWN ARBORIST/PARKS MANAGER Recommendation: It is recommended that the Council accept the work and authorize recording of a Notice of Completion for the Holbrook­Palmer Park Tennis Court Overlay (Courts 1 and 2) Project, Project Number 56108.

Description: This item is a review of the Tennis Court project that was completed.

8. APPROVAL OF A PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE AND SERVICES SUPPORT AGREEMENT FOR THE TOWN CENTER BUILDING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM; DIRECT THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE THE AGREEMENT AND
AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT ON
BEHALF OF THE TOWN
Report: ROBERT OVADIA, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
Recommendation: It is recommended that the Council approve an agreement with Syserco, Inc. for preventative maintenance and support services the Town Center Complex Building Management System; direct the City Attorney to prepare the agreement; and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement on behalf of the Town.

Description: This item is for Council consideration to approve for a maintenance and services agreement to support Town facilities.

9. APPROVAL OF A MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR THE TOWN CENTER SECURITY SYSTEMS; DIRECT THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE THE AGREEMENT AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE TOWN
Report: ROBERT OVADIA, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
Recommendation: It is recommended that the Council approve an agreement with Commercial Controls, Inc. for system support and preventative maintenance the Town Center Complex security system; direct the City Attorney to prepare the agreement; and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement on behalf of the Town.

Description: This item will be a discussion and consideration for approval for maintenance and services support for Town facilities.

REGULAR AGENDA (Items 10 – 11)

10. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ATHERTON AMENDING CHAPTER 8.16 (NOISE CONTROL) OF THE ATHERTON MUNICIPAL CODE.

Report: STEVEN D. MCCULLEY, POLICE CHIEF
Recommendation: Consider amendments to the Town’s Noise Control Ordinance, Chapter 8.16 and direct staff to return the Ordinance for Public Hearing and Introduction at the December 21 Council Meeting.

DitiThiitillbCildiitiddithT’

and services support for Town facilities.

REGULAR AGENDA (Items 10 – 11)

10. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ATHERTON AMENDING CHAPTER 8.16 (NOISE CONTROL) OF THE ATHERTON MUNICIPAL CODE.

Report: STEVEN D. MCCULLEY, POLICE CHIEF
Recommendation: Consider amendments to the Town’s Noise Control Ordinance, Chapter 8.16 and direct staff to return the Ordinance for Public Hearing and Introduction at the December 21 Council Meeting.

Description: This item will be a Council discussion to consider amending the Town’s Municipal Code Ordinance related to Noise.

11. RECOMMENDATION FROM THE TOWN’S AUDIT AND FINANCE COMMITTEE TO BEGIN PAYING THE RETIREE OPEB HEALTH BENEFITS FROM THE TOWN’S PARS TRUST ACCOUNT
Report: ROBERT BARRON III, FINANCE DIRECTOR
Recommendation: Approve recommendation from the Town’s Audit and Finance committee to begin paying the retiree OPEB health benefits from the Town’s PARS Trust account.

Description: This item will be a Council discussion to review and approve a recommendation from the Town’s Audit and Finance committee to begin paying the retiree OPEB health benefits from the Town’s PARS Trust account.

COUNCIL REPORTS/COMMENTS

ADJOURN

JPA Budget Presentation 2016-2017
San Mateo County Libraries
2021-22 Annual Report
1 Tomika J Price
Atherton Library Manager

Vision
San Mateo County Libraries ignite growth
through transformative experiences
Mission
San Mateo County Libraries strengthen our community
by creating an inclusive sense of place and environment for learning Page 11 of 364
Systemwide Year in Numbers
96%
Favorability
Rating

1.67M
Website
Visitors

4.1M
Wireless
Sessions
1st
In California
Star Library Ratings
3rd
In National
Star Library Ratings

Local Year in Numbers
2M
Items
Circulated
935,621
Library
Visitors

ITEMS CIRCULATED

LIBRARY VISITORS

Here for You

Impactful Service

Expanded Hours
2,348
Programs
and Events
29,749
Total Number of
Hours Open

Vital Support
10,000
Masks Distributed
25,000
Tests Distributed
32,356
Meals
Served

Student Support
The library has been the
most important part of
my kids' education and
well-being."
—Library Patron

Treasured Partner
“An excellent and valued
community resource that has
proved of even greater value
during these strained times
for me and my family. Thank
you."
—Library Patron

Growing Resources
40,000
New eLearning
Courses
700,444
Digital Downloads

Inspiring Summers
954
Students
Enrolled
149
Youth
Hired

Exploration and Growth

Open for Exploration
“The library has
evolved from a place
for books, music and
movies to a place of
learning in so many
forms.”
—Library Patron

Makerspace Leader
9,912
STEAM and Maker
Event Attendees
1,553
3D Printing Hours

Overview | Accomplishments | Performance | Recommended Budget "The libraries are light
and bright and wonderful
spaces for adults
and children!"
—Library Patron
Inspiring Spaces

Empowering Community

Why I Come to SMCL

Thank you!
Tomika J Price
Atherton Library Manager

2020 2021 2022
January $ 1,701,590 $ 3,047,204 $ 3,932,174
February $ 3,077,439 $ 2,965,501 $ 1,535,792
March $ 2,713,521 $ 2,730,084 $ 2,338,442
April $ 2,638,942 $ 3,330,434 $ 7,114,054
May $ 2,793,869 $ 3,953,961 $ 1,895,271
June $ 3,914,678 $ 3,812,881 $ 2,452,489
July $ 4,914,756 $ 5,455,268 $ 3,336,861
August $ 3,427,022 $ 2,741,619 $ 2,254,058
September $ 3,389,151 $ 3,269,368 $ 1,722,938
October $ 3,687,946 $ 2,278,127 $ 1,495,823
November $ 3,354,634 $ 2,752,017
December $ 2,821,639 $ 1,859,218
$ 38,435,187 $ 38,195,682 $ 28,077,902
Town of Atherton
3-Year Monthly Claims Table
January February March April May June July August September October November December 2020 $1,701,590 $3,077,439 $2,713,521 $2,638,942 $2,793,869 $3,914,678 $4,914,756 $3,427,022 $3,389,151 $3,687,946 $3,354,634 $2,821,639 2021 $3,047,204 $2,965,501 $2,730,084 $3,330,434 $3,953,961 $3,812,881 $5,455,268 $2,741,619 $3,269,368 $2,278,127 $2,752,017 $1,859,218 2022 $3,932,174 $1,535,792 $2,338,442 $7,114,054 $1,895,271 $2,452,489 $3,336,861 $2,254,058 $1,722,938 $1,495,823 $-
$1,000,000
$2,000,000
$3,000,000
$4,000,000
$5,000,000
$6,000,000
$7,000,000
$8,000,000

TOWN OF ATHERTON
3-YEAR MONTHLY CLAIMS CHART

ITEM NO. 9

TOWN OF ATHERTON
CLAIMS LIST OCTOBER 2022
Previous Yr.

October
2022
October
2021
A/P Checks (#31004-31149)
Payroll Checks (#599-599)
Direct Deposit - Payroll
Electronic Transfer - A/P & Payroll
Amount
$ 862,356
896
295,374
337,197
Amount
$1,637,753
835
302,641
336,898
OCTOBER 2022 Total $ 1,495,823 $2,278,127
I, George Rodericks, City Manager of the Town of Atherton, do hereby certify that the demand listed above, check numbers 599-599 (payroll), and 31004-31149 (accounts payable), and electronic transfers for employees direct deposits, federal payroll taxes and fees, inclusive, amount to $ 1,495,823 are true and correct based on the information provided to me and that there are sufficient funds for payment. _______________________________ George Rodericks
City Manager
The above claims, check numbers 599-599 (payroll), and 31004-31149 (accounts payable), and electronic transfers for employees direct deposits, federal payroll taxes and fees, inclusive, amount to $ 1,495,823 are true and correct and are authorized for payment. _______________________________
R. DeGolia
Mayor, Town of Atherton

SOURCE OF FUNDS
October 2022 October 2021
101 General Fund $ 1,231,096 $1,009,840
105 Tennis Fund 71,553 25
201 Special Tax 941 7,540
202 Measure A 1,466
203 Gas Tax 5,313 6,569
213 Library Fund 21,013
221 Refuse Rate Stabilization Fund 2,487
401 GF Projects (1,986) 40,955
403 Ath Channel Drainage Dt 1,736
406 Facilities Construction 81,454 1,159,256
610 Equipment Replacement 41,987 3,998
615 General Liability Fund 1,974
616 Employee Benefits Funds 42,986 43,747
TOTAL $ 1,495,823 $2,278,127 Page 30 of 364
Check# Vendor Name Check Date Invoice# Fund Dept Description Amount 31004 A DANISH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 10/6/2022 BP22-00762 General Fund Refund Plng Surcharge Fee -App Withdrawn BP22-00762, 273 Catalpa 3.65
31004 A DANISH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 10/6/2022 BP22-00762 General Fund Refund Tech Surcharge Fee -App Withdrawn BP22-00762, 273 Catalpa 4.72
31004 A DANISH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 10/6/2022 BP22-00762 General Fund Refund Permit Fee -App Withdrawn BP22-00762, 273 Catalpa 143.00 31004 Total 151.37
31005 AFLAC 10/6/2022 501-09-2022 General Fund PR Batch 00501.09.2022 Aflac Accident (Pre-Tax) 251.82 31005 AFLAC 10/6/2022 501-09-2022 General Fund PR Batch 00501.09.2022 Aflac Cancer Ins(Pre-Tax) 48.07 31005 AFLAC 10/6/2022 501-09-2022 General Fund PR Batch 00501.09.2022 Aflac Dental Plan (Pre-Tax) 28.02 31005 AFLAC 10/6/2022 501-09-2022 General Fund PR Batch 00501.09.2022 Aflac Hosp. Conf. Id (Pre-Tax) 103.38 31005 AFLAC 10/6/2022 501-09-2022 General Fund PR Batch 00501.09.2022 Aflac Hosp.Conf.Id (After-Tax) 19.26 31005 AFLAC 10/6/2022 501-09-2022 General Fund PR Batch 00501.09.2022 Aflac Life Emp (After -Tax) 38.40 31005 AFLAC 10/6/2022 501-09-2022 General Fund PR Batch 00501.09.2022 Aflac Speci Health (Pre-Tax) 29.10 31005 AFLAC 10/6/2022 501-09-2022 General Fund PR Batch 00501.09.2022 Aflac STD (After-Tax) 571.38 31005 AFLAC 10/6/2022 501-09-2022 General Fund PR Batch 00501.09.2022 Aflac Vision Plan(Pre-Tax) 16.99 31005 AFLAC 10/6/2022 502-09-2022 General Fund PR Batch 00502.09.2022 Aflac Accident (Pre-Tax) 251.82 31005 AFLAC 10/6/2022 502-09-2022 General Fund PR Batch 00502.09.2022 Aflac Cancer Ins(Pre-Tax) 48.07 31005 AFLAC 10/6/2022 502-09-2022 General Fund PR Batch 00502.09.2022 Aflac Dental Plan (Pre-Tax) 28.02 31005 AFLAC 10/6/2022 502-09-2022 General Fund PR Batch 00502.09.2022 Aflac Hosp. Conf. Id (Pre-Tax) 103.38 31005 AFLAC 10/6/2022 502-09-2022 General Fund PR Batch 00502.09.2022 Aflac Hosp.Conf.Id (After-Tax) 19.26 31005 AFLAC 10/6/2022 502-09-2022 General Fund PR Batch 00502.09.2022 Aflac Life Emp (After -Tax) 38.40 31005 AFLAC 10/6/2022 502-09-2022 General Fund PR Batch 00502.09.2022 Aflac Speci Health (Pre-Tax) 29.10 31005 AFLAC 10/6/2022 502-09-2022 General Fund PR Batch 00502.09.2022 Aflac STD (After-Tax) 571.38 31005 AFLAC 10/6/2022 502-09-2022 General Fund PR Batch 00502.09.2022 Aflac Vision Plan(Pre-Tax) 16.99 31005 Total 2,212.84
31006 ALHAMBRA 10/6/2022 21928698 092922 General Fund Police Drinking Water PD Sept 2022 110.32 31006 Total 110.32
31007 ASSOCIATION OF BAY AREA GOVERNMENT 10/6/2022 AR029742 General Fund DPW-Park Program 150 Watkins HP Activity Bldg Oct 2022 163.26 31007 ASSOCIATION OF BAY AREA GOVERNMENT 10/6/2022 AR029742 General Fund DPW-Park Maint. 160 Watkins (Gilmore House) Oct 2022 395.63 31007 ASSOCIATION OF BAY AREA GOVERNMENT 10/6/2022 AR029742 General Fund DPW-Street Maint. 99 Dinkenspiel/Corp Office Oct 2022 21.11 31007 Total 580.00
31008 AT&T CALNET 3 10/6/2022 18833328 General Fund Interdepartmental 0576 PRI T-1 Circuit 8/27/22 -9/26/22 167.08 31008 AT&T CALNET 3 10/6/2022 18833328 General Fund Interdepartmental 5301 PRI Svc 8/27/22 -9/26/22 474.33 31008 Total 641.41
31009 AXON ENTERPRISES INC. 10/6/2022 92022-4239-1741 General Fund Police (1) Axon Cert -Body Worn Camera & Taser N. Torres PD 874.00 31009 AXON ENTERPRISES INC. 10/6/2022 92022-4240-1742 General Fund Police (1) Axon Cert -Body Worn Camera & Taser V. Kumar PD 874.00 31009 Total 1,748.00
31010 BIANCHINI'S CATERING 10/6/2022 41983 General Fund Police Catering Svcs -(15) Breakfast for Staffs Briefing Room PD 9/27/22 259.77 31010 BIANCHINI'S CATERING 10/6/2022 41984 General Fund Police Catering Svcs -(19) Breakfast for Staffs Briefing Room PD 9/29/22 318.83 31010 BIANCHINI'S CATERING 10/6/2022 41986 General Fund Police Catering Svcs -(12) Lunch Box for Staffs Briefing Room PD 9/27/22 149.40 31010 BIANCHINI'S CATERING 10/6/2022 41987 General Fund Police Catering Svcs -(12) Lunch Box for Staffs Briefing Room PD 9/29/22 149.40 31010 BIANCHINI'S CATERING 10/6/2022 41989 General Fund Police Catering Svcs -(15) Breakfast for Staffs Briefing Room PD 10/4/22 263.87 Checks by Date - Detail by Check Number
For the Month of October 2022

Check# Vendor Name Check Date Invoice# Fund Dept Description Amount 31010 BIANCHINI'S CATERING 10/6/2022 42062 General Fund Administration Catering Svc -(12) Lunch Box for Meet & Greet Council Members & Staff Admin 10/6/22 259.10
31010 BIANCHINI'S CATERING 10/6/2022 42115 General Fund Administration Catering Svcs -(10) Lunch Box for Mgmt Analyst Interviews Admin 10/4/22 159.50
31010 Total 1,559.87
31011 CACEO 10/6/2022 200022553 General Fund Police
(1) CA Assoc of Code Enforcement Officers Certification Fee L.

Daley PD 200.00
31011 Total 200.00
31012 CALIFORNIA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 10/6/2022 501-10-2022NT General Fund PR Batch 00501.10.2022 Garnishment 177.69 31012 Total 177.69
31013 CALIFORNIA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 10/6/2022 501-10-2022FR General Fund PR Batch 00501.10.2022 Garnishment 323.07 31013 Total 323.07
31014 CITRIX SYSTEMS INC. 10/6/2022 440000376238 General Fund Building Addtl (5) Sharefiles Svc Unlimited Premium for a Total of (25) Plng 1,068.50 31014 Total 1,068.50
31015 CODE PUBLISHING COMPANY INC 10/6/2022 GC0008718 General Fund City Council (7) New Pages Municipal Code Web Update 192.75 31015 Total 192.75
31016 DELTA DENTAL OF CALIFORNIA 10/6/2022 501-09-2022 General Fund PR Batch 00501.09.2022 Dental Ins 4,465.59 31016 DELTA DENTAL OF CALIFORNIA 10/6/2022 BE005153018 General Fund Dental Cobra A. Kockler PD Oct 2022 192.17 31016 DELTA DENTAL OF CALIFORNIA 10/6/2022 BE005153018 General Fund Dental Cobra J. Wade PD Oct 2022 192.17 31016 Total 4,849.93
31017 DOUGLAS CHUNG KIM 10/6/2022 2516 General Fund Administration Contract Sustainability Coordinator Management Sept 2022 5,000.00 31017 Total 5,000.00
31018 D-PREP INC. 10/6/2022 ADVCPTED202211 General Fund Police Adv CPTED Trng Reg Fee J. Massagli & N. Torres PD 11/7/22 - 11/9/22 662.00
31018 Total 662.00
31019 DUTTA GINA 10/6/2022 Sept26-27 2022 General Fund Police Lunch Child Exploitation Trng G. Dutta PD 9/25/22 17.00 31019 DUTTA GINA 10/6/2022 Sept26-27 2022 General Fund Police Lunch Child Exploitation Trng G. Dutta PD 9/26/22 17.00 31019 Total 34.00
31020 DYNASTY CLEANERS 10/6/2022 Sep-22 General Fund Police Uniform Cleaning Services PD Sept 2022 777.09 31020 Total 777.09
31021 ELLIOTT DANA 10/6/2022 3701 General Fund Police IT Svcs ADAPT PD Sept 2022 25.00 31021 Total 25.00
31022 FAST RESPONSE ON-SITE TESTING INC. 10/6/2022 157127 General Fund Police Annual Gas Mask Fit Testing & N95 Mask Testing for All Personnel Cal-OSAH Mandate 9/27/22 PD 2,595.00
31022 FAST RESPONSE ON-SITE TESTING INC. 10/6/2022 157130 General Fund Police Annual Gas Mask Fit Testing & N95 Mask Testing for all Personnel Cal-OSAH Mandate 9/29/22 PD 2,699.00
31022 Total 5,294.00
31023 FASTSIGNS OF REDWOOD CITY 10/6/2022 395-45705 General Fund Police (4) Alarm Signs PD 153.83 31023 Total 153.83
31024 FRINK GENE D. 10/6/2022 1013403 General Fund Police (100) Atherton PD Centennial Coin 600.00 31024 Total 600.00
31025 GOVINVEST INC. 10/6/2022 2022-3543 General Fund Finance GASB 75 Full Valuation & OPEB Module Lic Fee FY 22/23 Fin 9,907.50 31025 Total 9,907.50
31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 0866/9-22-22JF General Fund Police (1) Treasured Memories LED Lantern for Dispatcher Allen Condolences PD 91.37
31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 0866/9-22-22JF General Fund Police (1) ca Paper, (2) Toner, (1) Address Labels for Code Enf PD 171.13 31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 0866/9-22-22JF General Fund Police (2) Mounting Strips K9 Art Photos PD 18.01

Check# Vendor Name Check Date Invoice# Fund Dept Description Amount 31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 0866/9-22-22JF General Fund Police (4) HP Toners Sgt Office PD 474.21 31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 0866/9-22-22JF General Fund Police (4) 2022 CA Vehicle Qwik Code Book for Traffic Unit PD 127.95 31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 0866/9-22-22JF General Fund Police (1) Dry Gas 108L/223PPM Tank Used w/All Intoximeters -Blood Alcohol Content PD 246.12
31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 0866/9-22-22JF General Fund Police Bridge Toll Follow Up Burg Case K. Patel PD 8/10/22 7.00 31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 0866/9-22-22JF General Fund Police CA Assoc of Hostage Negotiators Membership FY2022/23 K.

Pronske PD 41.00
31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 0866/9-22-22JF General Fund Police (1) Emotional Survival for Law Enforcement: A Guide for Officers Book Sgt Exam PD 60.16
31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 0866/9-22-22JF General Fund Police Airfare Women Leaders in Law Trng K. Pronske PD 9/11/22 - 9/14/22 141.00
31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 0866/9-22-22JF General Fund Police Lunches for (7) Staffs & CHP Officers Trng PD 9/14/22 230.40 31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 0866/9-22-22JF General Fund Police Snap Chat Investigations Trng Reg Fee D. Andruha PD 60.00 31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 0866/9-22-22JF General Fund Police Snap Chat Investigations Trng Reg Fee J. Taylor PD 60.00 31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 0866/9-22-22JF General Fund Police Backpacks to Atherton School (POA Reimburse to Town) PD 470.63 31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 0866/9-22-22JF General Fund Police (1) 2022 CA Vehicle Code Book PD 38.28 31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 3299/9-22-22EJ General Fund Police Apple Storage Plan E. Johnson PD 0.99 31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 3299/9-22-22EJ General Fund Police (2) pk 6x8 & (2) pk 9x12 Heat Sealed Evidence Bags PD 134.10 31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 3299/9-22-22EJ General Fund Police Lodging RIMS Conf E. Johnson PD 10/10/22 -10/14/22 314.69 31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 4525/9-22-22HL General Fund DPW-Park Maint. (2) Liquid Soap Dispenser HP Park 83.66 31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 4525/9-22-22HL General Fund DPW-Park Maint. (1) Deluxe Smoker's Pole, (1) Metal Smoker's Receptacle HP Park 617.54 31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 5279/9-22-22FR General Fund Administration (16) bx Snacks, Cookies & Chips, (24) ct LaCroix Sparkling Water, (35) ct Diet Coke Admin 295.01
31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 5279/9-22-22FR General Fund Administration (2) 7/32" Hex Dogging Key w/Full Loop for Push Bar Panic Exit Device Admin 19.66
31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 5279/9-22-22FR General Fund Administration (2) Joneaz Dogging Key 5/32 inch for Push Bar Panic Exit Device Admin 13.10
31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 5279/9-22-22FR General Fund Administration (5) $100 Target Gift Cards for Good City Co & Neal Martin Plng 500.00 31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 5762/9-22-22DL General Fund Police (2) Ground Coffee, (8) Paper Towels, (1) The Profession Sgt Exam Books PD 111.36
31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 5762/9-22-22DL General Fund Police (40) Wrenches Survival Tool ADAPT PD 217.60 31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 5762/9-22-22DL General Fund Police (1) Carbine Upper Receiver SWAT Rifle D. Romero PD 961.33 31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 5762/9-22-22DL General Fund Police (1) pk Paper Plates, (2) pk Compostable Forks,Spoons, Knives Comm Center PD 161.82
31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 5762/9-22-22DL General Fund Police (1) Emotional Survival for Law Enf A Guide for Officer Book Sgt Exam PD 30.83
31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 5762/9-22-22DL General Fund Police Investigating Tool Svc PD 169.30 31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 5762/9-22-22DL General Fund Police Lodging RIMS Conference K. Cisco PD 10/9/22 -10/14/22 373.86 31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 5762/9-22-22DL General Fund Police (1) Solar Fence Lights for Gate PD 43.74 31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 6914/9-22-22APD General Fund Police Lunch (7) Pizzas Drill Exercise ADAPT PD 9/10/22 251.17 31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 6914/9-22-22APD General Fund Police Breakfast Items Drill Exercise ADAPT PD 9/10/22 11.98 31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 6914/9-22-22APD General Fund Police Breakfast Items Drill Exercise ADAPT PD 9/10/22 62.51 31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 6914/9-22-22APD General Fund Police Coffee Drill Exercise ADAPT PD 9/10/22 40.00 31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 6914/9-22-22APD General Fund Police Coffee Purchased in Error (Pay Back to Town) PD 4.95 31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 6914/9-22-22APD General Fund Police Coffee Purchased in Error (Pay Back to Town) PD 4.95 31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 6914/9-22-22APD General Fund Police Coffee Purchased in Error (Pay Back to Town) PD 4.95 31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 7361/9-22-22GR General Fund Administration (8) Books "The Element of Style" 4th Edition Admin 47.68

Check# Vendor Name Check Date Invoice# Fund Dept Description Amount 31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 7361/9-22-22GR General Fund Administration Airfare Bag Fee ICMA Conference CM G. Rodericks 9/17/22 - 9/21/22 60.00
31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 7361/9-22-22GR General Fund City Council Dinner League of CA Cities Conference CM G. Rodericks 9/8/22 320.42 31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 7361/9-22-22GR General Fund Administration Lodging League of CA Cities Conference CM G. Rodericks 9/7/22 - 9/9/22 604.57
31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 7361/9-22-22GR General Fund Administration Parking Fee ICMA Conference CM G. Rodericks 9/17/22 -9/21/22 200.00 31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 7361/9-22-22GR General Fund Administration Parking Fee League of CA Cities CM G. Rodericks 9/7/22 -9/9/22 114.00 31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 7361/9-22-22GR General Fund Administration The Wall Street Journal CM G. Rodericks 38.99 31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 7361/9-22-22GR General Fund Administration Uber ICMA Conference CM G. Rodericks 9/17/22 49.34 31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 7361/9-22-22GR General Fund Administration Uber ICMA Conference CM G. Rodericks 9/21/22 58.76 31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 7361/9-22-22GR General Fund Administration Uber League of CA Cities Conference CM G. Rodericks 9/7/22 31.02 31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 7361/9-22-22GR General Fund Administration Uber League of CA Cities Conference CM G. Rodericks 9/9/22 94.27 31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 9369/9-22-22AS General Fund Interdepartmental Adobe Lic Annual Fee 288.83 31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 9369/9-22-22AS General Fund Interdepartmental Adobe Lic Annual Fee 179.88 31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 9369/9-22-22AS General Fund Administration Cake & Party Items for Good City Farewell 123.65 31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 9369/9-22-22AS General Fund Interdepartmental CANVA Software 12.99 31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 9369/9-22-22AS General Fund Administration Card Stock for Good City Plaques 5.35 31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 9369/9-22-22AS General Fund Interdepartmental Dropbox Business Membership 72.00 31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 9369/9-22-22AS General Fund Interdepartmental Dropbox Business Membership 54.00 31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 9369/9-22-22AS General Fund Interdepartmental IT Equipment 36.39 31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 9369/9-22-22AS General Fund Administration Linked in Annual Membership Recruiter Lite HR FY22/23 Admin 1,679.88 31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 9369/9-22-22AS General Fund City Council Lodging League of CA Cities Conference Council 277.44 31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 9369/9-22-22AS General Fund Interdepartmental Microsoft Fee 1.00 31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 9369/9-22-22AS General Fund Administration Prints for Good City Plaques 28.30 31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 9369/9-22-22AS General Fund City Council Refund League of CA Cities Conf Reg Fee Council (525.00) 31026 IMPAC. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 10/6/2022 9369/9-22-22AS General Fund Interdepartmental Zoom Large Meeting Capacity Membership Town 299.90 31026 Total 10,820.02
31027 INFINITY TECHNOLOGIES 10/6/2022 833 General Fund Interdepartmental (100) BlackBerry Guard Advanced Device Gov Advantage Support 10/7/22 -10/6/23 9,500.00
31027 INFINITY TECHNOLOGIES 10/6/2022 833 General Fund Planning (3) New Monitors for Planning Staffs Plng 1,976.88 31027 INFINITY TECHNOLOGIES 10/6/2022 833 General Fund Interdepartmental Contract IT Support Svcs Sept 2022 13,600.00 31027 INFINITY TECHNOLOGIES 10/6/2022 870 General Fund DPW-Engineering Contract General GIS Support PW Sept 2022 3,255.00 31027 Total 28,331.88
31028 KIM TURNER LLC 10/6/2022 INVOICE-1918 General Fund Police Active Shooter Situations Trng Reg Fee G. Abarca PD 12/19/22 149.00 31028 Total 149.00
31029 KRONICK MOSKOVITZ TIEDEMANN & GIRARD 10/6/2022 305372 General Fund City Attorney Town Attorney COVID-19 Emergency Aug 2022 489.00 31029 KRONICK MOSKOVITZ TIEDEMANN & GIRARD 10/6/2022 305372 General Fund City Attorney Town Attorney-Retainer Fees Aug 2022 16,552.63 31029 KRONICK MOSKOVITZ TIEDEMANN & GIRARD 10/6/2022 305377 General Fund City Attorney Town Attorney-CCAP Svcs Aug 2022 873.00 31029 KRONICK MOSKOVITZ TIEDEMANN & GIRARD 10/6/2022 305378 General Fund City Attorney Town Attorney-Monsanto Svcs Aug 2022 1,026.00

Check# Vendor Name Check Date Invoice# Fund Dept Description Amount 31029 KRONICK MOSKOVITZ TIEDEMANN & GIRARD 10/6/2022 305379 General Fund City Attorney Town Attorney-Belbrook Svcs Aug 2022 717.77 31029 Total 19,658.40
31030 LEBLANC ASSOCIATES INC. 10/6/2022 183925 General Fund Administration Shipping Fee for Back up Toner Admin 15.64 31030 Total 15.64
31031 MATAROZZI/PELSINGER BUILDERS INC. 10/6/2022 BP21-00053 General Fund Refund Recycling Dep BP21-00053, 351 Stockbridge 1,000.00 31031 Total 1,000.00
31032 MCCULLEY STEVE 10/6/2022 Sept 28 2022 General Fund Police SMC Chiefs Exec Group Breakfast Meeting Chief S. McCulley PD 9/28/22 75.38
31032 Total 75.38
31033 MORRISEY COMPTON EDUCATIONAL CTR 10/6/2022 Inv #284 General Fund Refund Park Event Dep Inv#284, 9/24/22 598.00 31033 Total 598.00
31034 PATRICK HAWKINS PRINTING INC. 10/6/2022 20078 General Fund Police (500) Business Cards L. Daley PD 96.25 31034 Total 96.25
31035 PG & E 10/6/2022 08963023620/Sept2022 General Fund DPW-Park Maint. 160 Watkins (GM House) 8/24/22 -9/22/22 354.90 31035 PG & E 10/6/2022 80296999248/Sept2022 General Fund DPW-Street Maint. Traffic Control/Beacon Light 8/19/22 -9/20/22 93.31 31035 PG & E 10/6/2022 86713555828/Sept 2022 General Fund DPW-Street Maint. Signal Middlefield/Encinal 8/25/22 -9/23/22 64.39 31035 PG & E 10/6/2022 92913025489/Sept2022 General Fund DPW-Street Maint. Corp office/Storage 8/23/22 -9/21/22 134.10 31035 Total 646.70
31036 PITNEY BOWES GLOBAL FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC 10/6/2022 3105712685 General Fund Interdepartmental Lease USPS Digital Mailing System Post Office 7/20/22 -10/19/22 1,060.65 31036 Total 1,060.65
31037 RIOS WENDY 10/6/2022 Inv #268 General Fund Refund Park Event Dep Inv#268, 10/1/22 598.00 31037 Total 598.00
31038 SAFE RESTRAINTS INC. 10/6/2022 TFATCA090722 General Fund Police (2) Protective Helmet PD 220.06 31038 Total 220.06
31039 SAN MATEO CNTY CHAPLAINCY 10/6/2022 July 20 2022 General Fund Police Call out for Chaplain's Svcs PD 07/20/22 250.00 31039 Total 250.00
31040 SAN MATEO CNTY FORENSIC LAB 10/6/2022 PS-INV104077 General Fund Police (3) DNA Analysis Svc PD Sept 2022 1,368.00 31040 SAN MATEO CNTY FORENSIC LAB 10/6/2022 PS-INV104077 General Fund Police (5) hrs Evidence Screen-Serology Svc PD Sept 2022 450.00 31040 SAN MATEO CNTY FORENSIC LAB 10/6/2022 PS-INV104077 General Fund Police (8) Phlebotomy Svc PD Sept 2022 1,040.00 31040 SAN MATEO CNTY FORENSIC LAB 10/6/2022 PS-INV104077 General Fund Police (1) Fingerprint Process Evidence Svc PD Sept 2022 422.00 31040 SAN MATEO CNTY FORENSIC LAB 10/6/2022 PS-INV104077 General Fund Police (1) Narcotic ID Svc PD Sept 2022 90.00 31040 SAN MATEO CNTY FORENSIC LAB 10/6/2022 PS-INV104077 General Fund Police (1) Serelogy Sexual Assault Kit Sept 2022 180.00 31040 Total 3,550.00
31041

SAN MATEO CNTY PUBLIC SAFETY
COMMUNICATIONS 10/6/2022 ATPD-MSS 23-01 General Fund Police Message Switch Fee PD Jul-Sept 2022 3,942.25 31041 Total 3,942.25
31042 SAVIANO COMPANY INC. 10/6/2022 8587-01 General Fund Install Overlay to Tennis Courts #1 & #2 Incl Asphalt Work Leveling, Header Board & (2) New Benches -5% Retention HP Park (3,300.00) 31042 SAVIANO COMPANY INC. 10/6/2022 8587-01 Tennis Fund Install Overlay to Tennis Courts #1 & #2 Incl Asphalt Work Leveling, Header Board & (2) New Benches HP Park 66,000.00 31042 Total 62,700.00
31043 SCOTT SAVAGE 10/6/2022 1768 General Fund Police
Modern Interview & Interrogation Trng Reg Fee V. Kumar PD 2/6/23 -2/8/23 520.00
31043 Total 520.00
31044 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP. 10/6/2022 B15907643 General Fund Interdepartmental (18) Windows -Office365PlanG1 Maint Svc 10/1/22 -9/30/23 1,531.26

Check# Vendor Name Check Date Invoice# Fund Dept Description Amount 31044 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP. 10/6/2022 B15907643 General Fund Interdepartmental (4) Windows -SQLSvrStdCore ALNG SA Maint Svc 10/1/22 -9/30/23 2,573.32 31044 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP. 10/6/2022 B15907643 General Fund Interdepartmental (79) Windows -O365GovE3 ShrdSvr Maint Svc 10/1/22 -9/30/23 18,538.93 31044 Total 22,643.51
31045 THERE WITH CARE 10/6/2022 Inv #258 General Fund Refund Park Event Dep Inv#258, 9/30/22 598.00 31045 THERE WITH CARE 10/6/2022 Inv #259 General Fund Refund Park Event Dep Inv#259, 10/1/22 598.00 31045 THERE WITH CARE 10/6/2022 Inv #302 General Fund Refund Park Event Dep Inv#302, 9/28/22 600.00 31045 Total 1,796.00
31046 THERE WITH CARE 10/6/2022 Inv #257 General Fund Refund Park Event Dep Inv#257, 9/29/22 598.00 31046 Total 598.00
31047 TOSHIBA FINANCIAL SERVICES 10/6/2022 32536929 General Fund Administration Lease Toshiba e-Studio 5516ACT Copier Admin Sept 2022 1,068.10 31047 Total 1,068.10
31048 TRIDENT K9 CONSULTING 10/6/2022 1419 General Fund Police Maint Trng K9 Jessie D. Romero PD 9/7, 9/14, 9/21 & 9/28/22 500.00 31048 Total 500.00
31049 TRIPEPI SMITH & ASSOCIATES INC. 10/6/2022 8771 General Fund Administration Content Development -Comm Support Svc Sept 2022 607.50 31049 Total 607.50
31050 VARSITY RESTAURANTS iNC. 10/6/2022 465767 General Fund Police Catering Svcs Town Wide Team Building Lunch PD 9/28/22 688.82 31050 Total 688.82
31051 VISION SERVICE PLAN 10/6/2022 816112894 General Fund Vision Cobra A. Kockler PD Oct 2022 32.46 31051 VISION SERVICE PLAN 10/6/2022 816112894 General Fund DPW-Engineering Vision D. Huynh (Will get Credit on Nov) PW Oct 2022 32.46 31051 VISION SERVICE PLAN 10/6/2022 816112894 General Fund Vision Cobra J. Wade PD Oct 2022 32.46 31051 VISION SERVICE PLAN 10/6/2022 501-09-2022 General Fund PR Batch 00501.09.2022 Vision Insurance 863.86 31051 Total 961.24
31052 WRNS STUDIO 10/6/2022 1500700102 Facilities Construction T & M Campus Pathway 34% Town Allocation Aug 2022 7,174.85 31052 WRNS STUDIO 10/6/2022 1500700102 Facilities Construction T & M Campus Pathway 66% Donation Allocation Aug 2022 13,927.65 31052 Total 21,102.50
31053 APPLIED CONCEPTS INC 10/13/2022 408324 Equipment Replacement Police (2) DSR 2X Radar w/Fast Lock Remote 2023 Tahoe & New Truck PD 7,109.38 31053 Total 7,109.38
31054 AT&T CALNET 3 10/13/2022 18860383 General Fund Police (2) Circuits 701 Laurel & 120 Reservoir PD Sept 2022 1,089.28 31054 AT&T CALNET 3 10/13/2022 18860550 General Fund Police (3) 911 BTNS Circuit PD Sept 2022 709.53 31054 Total 1,798.81
31055 BRINK'S INCORPORATED 10/13/2022 12079937 General Fund Finance Armored Car Services Fin Oct 2022 275.95 31055 Total 275.95
31056 CA BUILDING STANDARDS COMMISSION 10/13/2022 July-Sept 2022 General Fund CA Bldg Standards Commission Report -10% Local Gov Retainer JulSept 2022 (125.80) 31056 CA BUILDING STANDARDS COMMISSION 10/13/2022 July-Sept 2022 General Fund CA Bldg Standards Commission Report Fee Jul-Sept 2022 1,258.00 31056 Total 1,132.20
31057 CAL WATER SERVICE 10/13/2022 4726166666/Sept2022 General Fund DPW-Park Program 150 Watkins (Fire Protection) Sept 2022 37.11 31057 CAL WATER SERVICE 10/13/2022 4726166666/Sept2022 General Fund DPW-Park Program 150 Watkins (Little League/Drinking Fountain) 8/23/22 -9/22/22 136.57 31057 CAL WATER SERVICE 10/13/2022 4726166666/Sept2022 General Fund DPW-Park Program 150 Watkins 8/23/22 -9/22/22 674.80 31057 CAL WATER SERVICE 10/13/2022 4726166666/Sept2022 General Fund Administration 80 Fair Oaks Admin 8/2/22 -8/31/22 25.96 31057 CAL WATER SERVICE 10/13/2022 4726166666/Sept2022 General Fund Administration 80 Fair Oaks (2 METER) Admin 8/2/22 -8/31/22 21.91 31057 CAL WATER SERVICE 10/13/2022 4726166666/Sept2022 General Fund Building 80 Fair Oaks (2 METER) Bldg 8/2/22 -8/31/22 21.91 31057 CAL WATER SERVICE 10/13/2022 4726166666/Sept2022 General Fund Planning 80 Fair Oaks (2 METER) Bldg 8/2/22 -8/31/22 21.91 31057 CAL WATER SERVICE 10/13/2022 4726166666/Sept2022 General Fund DPW-Engineering 80 Fair Oaks (2 METER) PW 8/2/22 -8/31/22 21.91 31057 CAL WATER SERVICE 10/13/2022 4726166666/Sept2022 General Fund Police 80 Fair Oaks (2 METER) PD 8/2/22 -8/31/22 262.90

Check# Vendor Name Check Date Invoice# Fund Dept Description Amount 31057 CAL WATER SERVICE 10/13/2022 4726166666/Sept2022 General Fund Building 80 Fair Oaks Bldg 8/2/22 -8/31/22 25.96 31057 CAL WATER SERVICE 10/13/2022 4726166666/Sept2022 General Fund Planning 80 Fair Oaks Plng 8/2/22 -8/31/22 25.96 31057 CAL WATER SERVICE 10/13/2022 4726166666/Sept2022 General Fund DPW-Engineering 80 Fair Oaks PW 8/2/22 -8/31/22 25.96 31057 CAL WATER SERVICE 10/13/2022 4726166666/Sept2022 General Fund Police 80 Fair Oaks PD 8/2/22 -8/31/22 311.54 31057 CAL WATER SERVICE 10/13/2022 4726166666/Sept2022 General Fund DPW-Street Maint. Alameda/Atherton (M#62335098) 8/2/22 -8/31/22 264.07 31057 CAL WATER SERVICE 10/13/2022 4726166666/Sept2022 General Fund DPW-Street Maint. El Camino Real (M#62280052) 8/2/22 -8/31/22 264.07 31057 CAL WATER SERVICE 10/13/2022 4726166666/Sept2022 General Fund DPW-Street Maint. El Camino Real (M#62327517) 8/2/22 -8/31/22 264.07 31057 CAL WATER SERVICE 10/13/2022 4726166666/Sept2022 Library Fund Temp Library (Irrigation) 8/2/22 -8/31/22 2,784.70 31057 Total 5,191.31
31058 CHESLER CONSTRUCTION 10/13/2022 BP22-00487 General Fund Refund Recycling Dep BP22-00487, 71 Selby 11,501.63 31058 Total 11,501.63
31059 CINTAS CORPORATION 10/13/2022 4131855257 General Fund Police (1) 4X6 Active Scraper, (7) Traffic Mat PD Sept 2022 95.50 31059 CINTAS CORPORATION 10/13/2022 4133226368 General Fund Police (1) 4X6 Active Scraper, (7) Traffic Mat PD Oct 2022 95.50 31059 Total 191.00
31060 COMCAST 10/13/2022 0243773/Oct2022 General Fund Interdepartmental High Speed Internet Town 10/10/22 -11/9/22 221.72 31060 Total 221.72
31061 DEPT OF CONSERVATION 10/13/2022 July-Sept 2022 General Fund SMIP Report -5% Seismic Education Fee Bldg Jul-Sept 2022 (199.52) 31061 DEPT OF CONSERVATION 10/13/2022 July-Sept 2022 General Fund SMIP Report Fee Bldg Jul-Sept 2022 3,990.49 31061 Total 3,790.97
31062 EMBARCADERO MEDIA 10/13/2022 76924 General Fund Planning Legal Ad Housing Comm Meeting 10/11/22 Plng Sept 2022 826.00 31062 Total 826.00
31063

GREAT AMERICA FINANCIAL SERVICES
CORPORATION 10/13/2022 32536928 General Fund Building (1/3) Lease Toshiba E-Studio5015 AC Copier Bldg Sept 2022 294.84 31063

GREAT AMERICA FINANCIAL SERVICES
CORPORATION 10/13/2022 32536928 General Fund Planning (1/3) Lease Toshiba E-Studio5015 AC Copier Plng Sept 2022 294.84 31063

GREAT AMERICA FINANCIAL SERVICES
CORPORATION 10/13/2022 32536928 General Fund DPW-Engineering (1/3) Lease Toshiba E-Studio5015 AC Copier PW Sept 2022 294.84 31063 Total 884.52
31064 INTERSTATE TRAFFIC CONTROL PRODUCTS 10/13/2022 252676 Measure A (17) "Speed Limit 25" Sign PW 1,115.63 31064 INTERSTATE TRAFFIC CONTROL PRODUCTS 10/13/2022 253153 Measure A (4) 24X30 Speed Sign PW 350.00 31064 Total 1,465.63
31065 IRON MOUNTAIN INC 10/13/2022 GXJT863 General Fund Police Onsite Shredding Svcs PD 8/24/22 -9/27/22 405.06 31065 Total 405.06
31066 MCCULLEY STEVE 10/13/2022 Oct 12th 2022 General Fund DPW-Park Maint. (1) HP Compact Garbage Disposer, Power Cord Kit, Rubber Drain Stopper Gilmore House HP Park 231.19
31066 Total 231.19
31067 PATRICK HAWKINS PRINTING INC. 10/13/2022 20079 General Fund Planning (250) Business Cards S. Kwon, R. Hayagreev, C. Mendoza, M.

Matheou Plng 354.38
31067 Total 354.38
31068 PG & E 10/13/2022 08129690346/Sept2022 General Fund DPW-Park Maint. 150 Watkins Temp Trailers Park 8/19/22 -9/19/22 10.51 31068 PG & E 10/13/2022 11940786962/Sept2022 General Fund Administration Civic Center 80 Fair Oaks Admin & Council Chamber 8/19/22 - 9/19/22 652.07
31068 PG & E 10/13/2022 11940786962/Sept2022 General Fund Building Civic Center 80 Fair Oaks Bldg 8/19/22 -9/19/22 652.07 31068 PG & E 10/13/2022 11940786962/Sept2022 Library Fund Civic Center 80 Fair Oaks Library 8/19/22 -9/19/22 10,433.20 31068 PG & E 10/13/2022 11940786962/Sept2022 General Fund Police Civic Center 80 Fair Oaks PD 8/19/22 -9/19/22 13,041.49 31068 PG & E 10/13/2022 11940786962/Sept2022 General Fund Planning Civic Center 80 Fair Oaks Plng 8/19/22 -9/19/22 652.07 31068 PG & E 10/13/2022 11940786962/Sept2022 General Fund DPW-Engineering Civic Center 80 Fair Oaks PW 8/19/22 -9/19/22 652.07 31068 PG & E 10/13/2022 34579695882/Sept2022 General Fund DPW-Street Maint. Signal El Camino/Atherton 8/24/22 -9/22/22 116.95 31068 PG & E 10/13/2022 70862266965/Sept2022 General Fund DPW-Street Maint. Middlefield Smart Corridor 8/19/22 -9/19/22 40.57 31068 Total 26,251.00

Check# Vendor Name Check Date Invoice# Fund Dept Description Amount 31069 PRI MANAGEMENT GROUP 10/13/2022 18581 General Fund Police CA Public Record Act Seminar Reg Fee K. Cisco PD 11/17/22 259.00 31069 PRI MANAGEMENT GROUP 10/13/2022 18581 General Fund Police Webinar Redacting Records Reg Fee K. Cisco PD 1/12/23 159.00 31069 PRI MANAGEMENT GROUP 10/13/2022 18581 General Fund Police Webinar Sealing & Expunging Records Reg Fee K. Cisco PD 12/1/22 159.00 31069 Total 577.00
31070 S.J. AMOROSO CONSTRUCTION CO. LLC 10/13/2022 40 Facilities Construction CCAP CO No. 213 Demolish Old Chain Link Fence to Match the Gate & Fence ASI 21 per Town's Direction 17,689.00
31070 S.J. AMOROSO CONSTRUCTION CO. LLC 10/13/2022 40 Facilities Construction CCAP CO No. 214 Sand Prime, Tape & Paintholes from Marker Board & Tack Board Removal in PD per Town's Request 645.00 31070 S.J. AMOROSO CONSTRUCTION CO. LLC 10/13/2022 40 Facilities Construction CCAP CO No. 215 Remove & Store Fume Hood & Cut SS Counter per Town's Request 3,873.00
31070 S.J. AMOROSO CONSTRUCTION CO. LLC 10/13/2022 40 Facilities Construction CCAP CO No. 216 Rough-in Town's Furnish & Install WAPs-2EA & Relocate WAPs inside Library RFI 756 6,014.00
31070 Total 28,221.00
31071 SAN MATEO CNTY CONTROLLERS OFFICE 10/13/2022 Sep-22 General Fund Police Allocation of Parking Penalties PD Sept 2022 296.40 31071 Total 296.40
31072 SAN MATEO CNTY RECORDERS OFFICE 10/13/2022 49McCormick1 General Fund Planning Recorders Fee -Lot Line Adjustment 49 McCormick 44.00 31072 Total 44.00
31073 SAN MATEO CNTY RECORDERS OFFICE 10/13/2022 49McCormick2 General Fund Planning Recorders Fee -Lot Line Adjustment 49 McCormick (Void) 44.00 31073 Total 44.00
31074

SOUTH BAY REGIONAL PUBLIC SAFETY TRNG
CONSORTIUM 10/13/2022 149008 INV General Fund Police
Perishable Skills Program Trng Reg Fee D. Metzger PD 11/7/22 - 11/9/22 350.00
31074 Total 350.00
31075 THIRD DEGREE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 10/13/2022 11713 General Fund Police Officer Involved Incident Invest Trng G. Dutta PD 11/14/22 225.00 31075 Total 225.00
31076 TURBO DATA SYSTEMS INC 10/13/2022 38549 General Fund Police Citation Processing Fee PD Sept 2022 18.73 31076 TURBO DATA SYSTEMS INC 10/13/2022 38550 General Fund Police Lease (10) E-Cites PD Sept 2022 3,051.94 31076 Total 3,070.67
31077 US BANK VOYAGER FLEET SYSTEMS INC. 10/13/2022 8690164772239 General Fund Police Motorcycle Fuel Charges PD Sept 2022 215.57 31077 Total 215.57
31078 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC. 10/13/2022 190859 General Fund DPW-Street Maint. Tree Maint Svcs Streets PW 9/1/22 -9/15/22 5,600.00 31078 Total 5,600.00
31079 WEX BANK 10/13/2022 84204237 General Fund Police Vehicle Fuel Charges PD 9/7/22 -10/6/22 7,679.15 31079 Total 7,679.15
31080 WILLDAN ENGINEERING 10/13/2022 624087 Special Tax Eng Svcs Const Mgmt & Inspections 2022 Slurry Seal PW Aug 2022 941.00 31080 WILLDAN ENGINEERING 10/13/2022 624088 Gas Tax Eng Svcs Const Mgmt & Inspections 2022 Overlay PW Aug 2022 5,313.00 31080 Total 6,254.00
31081 A K CONSTRUCTION ENTERPRISES INC. 10/20/2022 APW22-00068 General Fund Refund Road Deposit APW22-00068, 163 Greenoaks 2,500.00 31081 Total 2,500.00
31082 A-A LOCK & ALARM INC 10/20/2022 304704 General Fund Police Service Call Extract Broken Key & Lubricate Padlock for Radar Trailer Corp Yard PD 320.00
31082 Total 320.00
31083 ALHAMBRA 10/20/2022 21903512 100522 General Fund Administration Drinking Water Admin Sept 2022 7.94 31083 Total 7.94
31084 APPLIED CONCEPTS INC 10/20/2022 408486 Equipment Replacement Police (1) MC 360 Message Trailer PD 20,671.88 31084 Total 20,671.88

Check# Vendor Name Check Date Invoice# Fund Dept Description Amount 31085 AT&T CALNET 3 10/20/2022 18888896 General Fund Police Miscellaneous Centrex Main line PD 9/10/22 -10/9/22 521.48 31085 Total 521.48
31086 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC. 10/20/2022 8093783 General Fund DPW-Park Maint. Contract Landscape Svcs & Maint HP Park Oct 2022 17,073.33 31086 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC. 10/20/2022 8093783 Tennis Fund Contract Landscape Svcs & Maint Tennis Court HP Park Oct 2022 776.33 31086 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC. 10/20/2022 8093783 General Fund DPW-Building Maint. Contract Landscape Svcs & Maint Town Oct 2022 473.59 31086 Total 18,323.25
31087 CALIFORNIA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 10/20/2022 502-10-2022NT General Fund PR Batch 00502.10.2022 Garnishment 177.69 31087 Total 177.69
31088 CALIFORNIA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 10/20/2022 502-10-2022FR General Fund PR Batch 00502.10.2022 Garnishment 323.07 31088 Total 323.07
31089 CISCO KRISTY 10/20/2022 Oct10-14 2022 General Fund Police Breakfast RIMS Trng K. Cisco PD 10/10/22 5.30 31089 CISCO KRISTY 10/20/2022 Oct10-14 2022 General Fund Police Breakfast RIMS Trng K. Cisco PD 10/13/22 14.19 31089 CISCO KRISTY 10/20/2022 Oct10-14 2022 General Fund Police Breakfast RIMS Trng K. Cisco PD 10/14/22 9.42 31089 CISCO KRISTY 10/20/2022 Oct10-14 2022 General Fund Police Dinner RIMS Trng K. Cisco PD 10/10/22 19.68 31089 CISCO KRISTY 10/20/2022 Oct10-14 2022 General Fund Police Dinner RIMS Trng K. Cisco PD 10/11/22 17.39 31089 CISCO KRISTY 10/20/2022 Oct10-14 2022 General Fund Police Dinner RIMS Trng K. Cisco PD 10/12/22 28.00 31089 CISCO KRISTY 10/20/2022 Oct10-14 2022 General Fund Police Lodging RIMS Trng K. Cisco PD 10/10/22 -10/14/22 315.12 31089 CISCO KRISTY 10/20/2022 Oct10-14 2022 General Fund Police Lunch RIMS Trng K. Cisco PD 10/10/22 17.00 31089 CISCO KRISTY 10/20/2022 Oct10-14 2022 General Fund Police Lunch RIMS Trng K. Cisco PD 10/11/22 17.00 31089 Total 443.10
31090 DIVISION OF THE STATE ARCHITECT 10/20/2022 July-Sept 2022 General Fund Disability Access & Education (Bus Lic) Report Fee Jul-Sept 2022 3,632.00 31090 DIVISION OF THE STATE ARCHITECT 10/20/2022 July-Sept 2022 GF Projects Disability Access & Education (Bus Lic) Report -Admin Fee Jul-Sept 2022 (3,268.80)
31090 Total 363.20
31091 FASTSIGNS OF REDWOOD CITY 10/20/2022 395-45983 General Fund Police (2) Alarm Signs, (2) Video Signs for Street Address #30 PD 153.83 31091 Total 153.83
31092 GARAVAGLIA ARCHITECTURE INC. 10/20/2022 20220252 GF Projects Town of Atherton Station Buiding Improvements Sept 2022 1,283.21 31092 Total 1,283.21
31093

GENERAL DYNMICS ORDINANCE & TACTICAL
SYSTEMS 10/20/2022 50001466 General Fund Police Simunition Trng Reg Fee K. MacDonald PD 1/24/22 -1/26/22 695.00 31093 Total 695.00
31094 GOOD CITY COMPANY 10/20/2022 2762 General Fund Housing Update Svcs Plng Jul 2022 12,032.63 31094 GOOD CITY COMPANY 10/20/2022 2762 General Fund Planning Contract Planning Svcs Jul 2022 25,427.50 31094 GOOD CITY COMPANY 10/20/2022 2790 General Fund Housing Update Svcs Plng Aug 2022 2,299.50 31094 GOOD CITY COMPANY 10/20/2022 2790 General Fund Planning Contract Planning Svcs Aug 2022 33,586.75 31094 GOOD CITY COMPANY 10/20/2022 2791 General Fund Storm Water Compliance Review PW Aug 2022 590.00 31094 GOOD CITY COMPANY 10/20/2022 2827 General Fund Housing Update Svcs Plng Sept 2022 4,362.50 31094 GOOD CITY COMPANY 10/20/2022 2827 General Fund Planning Contract Planning Svcs Sept 2022 1,845.00 31094 Total 80,143.88
31095 KBM OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC. 10/20/2022 110126 Facilities Construction CCAP Addtl Furniture for 2nd Floor 12,064.02 31095 Total 12,064.02
31096 KO ESTHER 10/20/2022 Inv #300 General Fund Refund Park Event Deposit Inv#300, 10/15/22 1,200.00 31096 Total 1,200.00
31097 KREFELD'S AWARDS INC 10/20/2022 32113 General Fund Police (1) Perpetual Plate Engraved Employee of 3rd Qtr G. Abarca PD 38.46 31097 Total 38.46

Check# Vendor Name Check Date Invoice# Fund Dept Description Amount 31098 LOS RIOS COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT 10/20/2022 23-105 General Fund Police Traffic Collision Invest Trng Reg Fee K. MacDonald PD 10/3/22 - 10/7/22 191.00
31098 Total 191.00
31099 MARINI MICHELLE 10/20/2022 Inv #309 General Fund Refund Park Event Deposit Inv#309, 10/16/22 1,200.00 31099 Total 1,200.00
31100 MCCULLEY STEVE 10/20/2022 Oct-22 General Fund DPW-Park Maint. Annual Fireplace Service & Diagnose Gilmore House HP Park 360.00 31100 MCCULLEY STEVE 10/20/2022 Oct-22 General Fund DPW-Park Maint. (38) Replace Window Screen White Small Clips in Spring Side Gilmore House HP Park 2,323.70
31100 Total 2,683.70
31101 MCE CORPORATION 10/20/2022 2209033 General Fund DPW-Building Maint. Contract Maint Svcs Facilities Sept 2022 1,443.45 31101 MCE CORPORATION 10/20/2022 2209033 General Fund DPW-Park Program Contract Maint Svcs Park Events Sept 2022 531.19 31101 MCE CORPORATION 10/20/2022 2209033 General Fund DPW-Park Maint. Contract Maint Svcs Park Sept 2022 8,850.59 31101 MCE CORPORATION 10/20/2022 2209033 General Fund DPW-Street Maint. Contract Maint Svcs Streets Sept 2022 14,626.32 31101 Total 25,451.55
31102 METROPOLITAN PLANNING GROUP 10/20/2022 2003451 General Fund Planning Contract Planning Svcs Aug 2022 26,417.50 31102 METROPOLITAN PLANNING GROUP 10/20/2022 2003451 General Fund Storm Water Compliance Review PW Aug 2022 1,560.00 31102 Total 27,977.50
31103 MUNISERVICES LLC 10/20/2022 INV06-015192 General Fund Finance Bus Lic Admin Processing Svcs Fin Apr 2022 260.00 31103 MUNISERVICES LLC 10/20/2022 INV06-015193 General Fund Finance Bus Lic Admin Processing Svcs Fin May 2022 400.00 31103 MUNISERVICES LLC 10/20/2022 INV06-015194 General Fund Finance Bus Lic Admin Processing Svcs Fin Jun 2022 540.00 31103 MUNISERVICES LLC 10/20/2022 INV06-015215 General Fund Finance Bus Lic Admin Processing Svcs Fin Jul 2022 2,675.00 31103 MUNISERVICES LLC 10/20/2022 INV06-015216 General Fund Finance Bus Lic Admin Processing Svcs Fin Aug 2022 12,425.00 31103 MUNISERVICES LLC 10/20/2022 INV06-015217 General Fund Finance Bus Lic Admin Processing Svcs Fin Sept 2022 7,775.00 31103 Total 24,075.00
31104 MYERS-STEVENS & TOOHEY CO. INC. 10/20/2022 1390744 General Fund Police Short-Term Insurance Premium PORAC Nov 2022 404.00 31104 MYERS-STEVENS & TOOHEY CO. INC. 10/20/2022 1390744 General Fund Police Long-Term Insurance Premium PORAC Nov 2022 404.00 31104 Total 808.00
31105 OCCASIONS ETC 10/20/2022 34151 General Fund City Council (3) Name Signs Plng Team for Council Meetings 81.90 31105 Total 81.90
31106 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LLC 10/20/2022 269527264001 General Fund Planning (1/3) ct Paper & Tissues, (1) Wall Mesh Org Plng 66.89 31106 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LLC 10/20/2022 269527264001 General Fund Building (1/3) ct Paper & Tissues Bldg 28.92 31106 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LLC 10/20/2022 269527264001 General Fund DPW-Engineering (1/3) ct Paper & Tissues PW 28.92 31106 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LLC 10/20/2022 269536056001 General Fund DPW-Engineering (1) ct 24x24 Liner PW 31.38 31106 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LLC 10/20/2022 269649100001 General Fund Police (2) Wrist Rest Foam E. Johnson PD 34.06 31106 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LLC 10/20/2022 269649832001 General Fund Police (2) Wrist Rest Foam PD 26.88 31106 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LLC 10/20/2022 271104165001 General Fund Police (4) ea Toner, (1) pk Post-It Dispatch PD 570.51 31106 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LLC 10/20/2022 271337952001 General Fund Administration (4) bx Lacroix Water, (5) ea 1" Binders, (4) ea 3" Binders Admin 74.44 31106 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LLC 10/20/2022 271849916001 General Fund DPW-Engineering (1/3) ct Wipes, (1/3) pk Sponge, (1/3) pk Lead PW 11.28 31106 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LLC 10/20/2022 271849916001 General Fund Building (1/3) ct Wipes, (1/3) pk Sponge, (1/3) pk Lead Bldg 8.46 31106 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LLC 10/20/2022 271849916001 General Fund Planning (1/3) ct Wipes, (1/3) pk Sponge, (1/3) pk Lead Plng 8.46 31106 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LLC 10/20/2022 271852253001 General Fund DPW-Engineering (1) Bx Gloves Pf PW 29.52 31106 Total 919.72
31107 PACIFIC PENINSULA CUSTOM GROUP 10/20/2022 BP20-00315 General Fund Refund Recycling Deposit BP20-00315, 95 Mesa 10,007.81 31107 PACIFIC PENINSULA CUSTOM GROUP 10/20/2022 BP20-00342 General Fund Refund 2nd Utility Deposit BP20-00342, 95 Mesa 5,000.00 31107 PACIFIC PENINSULA CUSTOM GROUP 10/20/2022 BP20-00342 General Fund Refund Recycling Deposit BP20-00342, 95 Mesa 1,000.00 31107 Total 16,007.81
31108 PENINSULA UNIFORMS & EQUIPMENT 10/20/2022 193756 General Fund Police Uniforms-(2) Polo w/Embroidered PD Logo & Name, (2) Pants Hem, Taper Leg & Sewing/Alterations J. Taylor PD 472.24

Check# Vendor Name Check Date Invoice# Fund Dept Description Amount 31108 PENINSULA UNIFORMS & EQUIPMENT 10/20/2022 194083 General Fund Police Uniforms-(1) Pants Rain, (1) Ear Mold & Tip J. Fong PD 129.78 31108 PENINSULA UNIFORMS & EQUIPMENT 10/20/2022 194248 General Fund Police Uniforms-(1) Badge & ID Holder L. Daley PD 25.22 31108 Total 627.24
31109 PG & E 10/20/2022 56788311910/Sept2022 General Fund DPW-Park Program Activity Bldg -150 Watkins 8/30/22 -9/28/22 193.05 31109 PG & E 10/20/2022 56788311910/Sept2022 General Fund DPW-Park Program Modular Bldg -150 Watkins 8/30/22 -9/28/22 522.92 31109 PG & E 10/20/2022 56788311910/Sept2022 General Fund DPW-Park Maint. Pump-150 Watkins 6/29/22 -7/28/22 1,136.75 31109 PG & E 10/20/2022 56788311910/Sept2022 General Fund DPW-Street Maint. Signal Marsh/Middlefield 8/25/22 -9/23/22 59.14 31109 PG & E 10/20/2022 56788311910/Sept2022 General Fund DPW-Street Maint. Signal Middlefield/Oak Grove 8/25/22 -9/23/22 74.41 31109 PG & E 10/20/2022 56788311910/Sept2022 General Fund DPW-Street Maint. Street Lights Sept 2022 4,516.58 31109 Total 6,502.85
31110 PLUMBING TECH REPIPE SPECIALISTS INC 10/20/2022 3020 General Fund DPW-Park Maint.

Partial Copper Repipe New Main Shut Off Valve Gilmore House HP Park 500.00
31110 Total 500.00
31111 PRIORITY 1 PUBLIC SAFETY EQUIP. 10/20/2022 8977 Equipment Replacement Police (2) Emergency Equipment for NewToyota Camry PD 11,463.71 31111 PRIORITY 1 PUBLIC SAFETY EQUIP. 10/20/2022 8979 Equipment Replacement Police (2) Emergency Equipment for NewToyota Camry PD 2,742.21 31111 Total 14,205.92
31112 RENNE PUBLIC LAW GROUP LLP 10/20/2022 8568 General Fund Administration State Legislative Advisory Svcs RPPG/Atherton State Lobbying Sept 2022 2,083.00
31112 RENNE PUBLIC LAW GROUP LLP 10/20/2022 8569 General Fund Administration State Legislative Advisory Svcs RPPG/Grant Writing Sept 2022 6,000.00 31112 Total 8,083.00
31113 SAN MATEO CNTY INFO SERV DEPT 10/20/2022 1YAT12209 General Fund Police (2) Microwave Mux DSo PD Sept 2022 164.51 31113 Total 164.51
31114 SAND HILL BUILDERS INC. 10/20/2022 BP19-00691 General Fund Refund 2nd Utility Deposit BP19-00691, 49 Wilburn 5,000.00 31114 Total 5,000.00
31115 SAVIANO COMPANY INC. 10/20/2022 8587-03 Tennis Fund Tennis Court Reconditioning HP Park 4,000.00 31115 Total 4,000.00
31116 SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION 10/20/2022 77836573 General Fund Police Lease Sharp MX-4071 2nd copier PD Oct 2022 238.44 31116 Total 238.44
31117 STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 10/20/2022 608826 General Fund Police (1) Fingerprint Apps PD Sept 2022 32.00 31117 Total 32.00
31118 TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENGINEERING 10/20/2022 47873 General Fund Police Facilities Mgmt & Maint Public Safety Comm Center PD Oct 2022 2,491.00 31118 Total 2,491.00
31119 THIRD DEGREE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 10/20/2022 11714 General Fund Police Fraud & Financial Crime Invest Trng Reg Fee G. Dutta PD 3/13/22 - 3/14/22 425.00
31119 THIRD DEGREE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 10/20/2022 11720 General Fund Police Fraud & Financial Crime Invest Trng Reg Fee J. Taylor PD 12/5/22 - 12/6/22 375.00
31119 Total 800.00
31120 THOMAS SWAN SIGN COMPANY INC. 10/20/2022 44103-08 Facilities Construction CCAP-Manufacture & Install (1) Set of Cut Aluminum Letters "Public Notices" 2,133.75
31120 Total 2,133.75
31121 TIAA COMMERCIAL FINANCE INC. 10/20/2022 9179714 General Fund Police Lease Sharp MX-M3570 Copier PD Oct 2022 275.30 31121 Total 275.30
31122 TONY'S CLEAN TEAM LLC 10/20/2022 15-2848 General Fund DPW-Park Maint. Janitorial COVID-19 Electrostatic Spraying PD 9/12/22 -10/11/22 998.00 31122 TONY'S CLEAN TEAM LLC 10/20/2022 15-2848 Library Fund Janitorial Maint Svcs Library 9/12/22 -10/11/22 4,745.00 31122 TONY'S CLEAN TEAM LLC 10/20/2022 15-2848 General Fund DPW-Park Maint. Janitorial Maint Svcs Park 9/12/22 -10/11/22 2,083.34 31122 TONY'S CLEAN TEAM LLC 10/20/2022 15-2848 General Fund DPW-Building Maint. Janitorial Maint Svcs Town 9/12/22 -10/11/22 10,593.66

Check# Vendor Name Check Date Invoice# Fund Dept Description Amount 31122 Total 18,420.00
31123 TRIPEPI SMITH & ASSOCIATES INC. 10/20/2022 8873 General Fund Administration Comm Support Svcs -Strategy, Quarterly Newsletter Design & Website Content Maint Oct 2022 4,915.00
31123 Total 4,915.00
31124 VASQUEZ BERNABE 10/20/2022 Proposal General Fund DPW-Park Maint. Interior Painting (35% Deposit) Gilmore House HP Park 6,825.00 31124 Total 6,825.00
31125 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC. 10/20/2022 190964 General Fund DPW-Park Maint. Tree Maint Svcs HP Park 9/16/22 -9/30/22 2,400.00 31125 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC. 10/20/2022 190965 General Fund DPW-Street Maint. Tree Maint Svcs Street 9/16/22 -9/30/22 4,000.00 31125 Total 6,400.00
31126 A-A LOCK & ALARM INC 10/27/2022 304607 Library Fund Locksmith Svcs to Convert Handing & Create Cylinder Escutcheon Plate to Cover Existing Holes in the Door Library 550.26 31126 Total 550.26
31127 AT&T MOBILITY 10/27/2022 388102X10192022 General Fund Police Data Mobile Comm PD 9/12/22 -10/11/22 1,493.11 31127 Total 1,493.11
31128 BITTON ELLIE 10/27/2022 Inv #298 General Fund Refund Park Event Deposit Inv#298, 10/23/22 600.00 31128 Total 600.00
31129 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC. 10/27/2022 8000075 General Fund DPW-Park Maint. Contract Landscape Svcs & Maint HP Park Aug 2022 17,073.33 31129 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC. 10/27/2022 8000075 Tennis Fund Contract Landscape Svcs & Maint Tennis Court Aug 2022 776.33 31129 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC. 10/27/2022 8000075 General Fund DPW-Building Maint. Contract Landscape Svcs & Maint Town Aug 2022 473.59 31129 Total 18,323.25
31130 CITY OF REDWOOD CITY 10/27/2022 324002 General Fund DPW-Street Maint. Fuel Charges PW 8/16/22 -9/15/22 142.94 31130 Total 142.94
31131 CMS SOLUTIONS 10/27/2022 2208251-IN General Fund Interdepartmental (1) New Phone & Shoretel Connect Onsite Essent for Mgmt Analyst Admin 596.09
31131 Total 596.09
31132 DUTTA GINA 10/27/2022 Oct 18-19 2022 General Fund Police Lunch 3rd Annual Cyber Crime Trng G. Dutta PD 10/18/22 - 10/19/22 17.00
31132 Total 17.00
31133 FOLGER GRAPHICS INC 10/27/2022 133944 General Fund Planning (2650) Housing Element Letters & Mailing Svc Plng Oct 2022 3,603.59 31133 Total 3,603.59
31134 HDL COREN & CONE 10/27/2022 SIN022165 General Fund Finance Contract Svcs Property Tax Fin Oct-Dec 2022 1,125.00 31134 Total 1,125.00
31135 INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP INC 10/27/2022 82602 Library Fund 1st Year Warranty Phase Facility Mngmt & Monitoring Svcs Library Sept 2022 2,500.00
31135 INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP INC 10/27/2022 82602 General Fund DPW-Building Maint. 1st Year Warranty Phase Facility Mngmt & Monitoring Svcs Town Sept 2022 4,437.50
31135 INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP INC 10/27/2022 82602 Facilities Construction CCAP Const Documents & Bidding Phase PM 26% Library
Allocation Sept 2022 832.00
31135 INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP INC 10/27/2022 82602 Facilities Construction CCAP Const Documents & Bidding Phase PM 66% Donation
Allocation Sept 2022 2,112.00
31135 INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP INC 10/27/2022 82602 Facilities Construction CCAP Const Documents & Bidding Phase PM 8% Town Allocation Sept 2022 256.00
31135 INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP INC 10/27/2022 82602 Facilities Construction CCAP IT Move from Temp Facilities To New Civic Center 50% Library Allocation Sept 2022 920.00
31135 INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP INC 10/27/2022 82602 Facilities Construction CCAP IT Move from Temp Facilities To New Civic Center 50% Town Allocation Sept 2022 920.00
31135 INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP INC 10/27/2022 82602 General Fund DPW-Engineering PM Svcs HP Parking Lot Turnaround & Park Access Circulation Improvement Sept 2022 840.00

Check# Vendor Name Check Date Invoice# Fund Dept Description Amount 31135 INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP INC 10/27/2022 82602 General Fund Building Private Development Plan Review Sept 2022 1,330.00 31135 Total 14,147.50
31136 INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP INC 10/27/2022 82593 General Fund Building Contract Bldg & Safety Svcs -58% Rev Sept 2022 53,787.99 31136 INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP INC 10/27/2022 82593 General Fund Building Reimb Lease Dell Computer Bldg Sept 2022 (148.92) 31136 Total 53,639.07
31137 KRONICK MOSKOVITZ TIEDEMANN & GIRARD 10/27/2022 305563 General Fund City Attorney Town Attorney-Monsanto Svcs Sept 2022 573.00 31137 KRONICK MOSKOVITZ TIEDEMANN & GIRARD 10/27/2022 305564 General Fund City Attorney Town Attorney-Belbrook Svcs Sept 2022 307.77 31137 KRONICK MOSKOVITZ TIEDEMANN & GIRARD 10/27/2022 305569 General Fund City Attorney Town Attorney-Retainer Fees Sept 2022 17,021.64 31137 Total 17,902.41
31138 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 10/27/2022 226858 General Fund Administration Prof Law Svc Advice re Investigation of Dispatcher PD Sept 2022 637.50 31138 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 10/27/2022 226875 General Fund Administration Prof Law Svc Retirement Advice PD Sept 2022 49.00 31138 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 10/27/2022 227793 General Fund Administration Prof Law Svc Claim ERMA PD Sept 2022 21,676.50 31138 Total 22,363.00
31139 MACK 5 10/27/2022 5225 Facilities Construction CCAP Project Mgmt T&M 8% Town Allocation Aug 2022 145.20 31139 MACK 5 10/27/2022 5225 Facilities Construction CCAP Project Mgmt T&M 26% Library Allocation Aug 2022 471.90 31139 MACK 5 10/27/2022 5225 Facilities Construction CCAP Project Mgmt T&M 66% Donation Allocation Aug 2022 1,197.90 31139 Total 1,815.00
31140 MCCULLEY STEVE 10/27/2022 Oct 14-18 2022 General Fund Police Airfare IACP Conference Chief S. McCulley PD 10/14/22 -10/18/22 417.20 31140 MCCULLEY STEVE 10/27/2022 Oct 14-18 2022 General Fund Police Breakfast IACP Conference Chief S. McCulley PD 10/18/22 16.00 31140 MCCULLEY STEVE 10/27/2022 Oct 14-18 2022 General Fund Police Dinner IACP Conference Chief S. McCulley PD 10/15/22 28.00 31140 MCCULLEY STEVE 10/27/2022 Oct 14-18 2022 General Fund Police Lodging IACP Conference Chief S. McCulley PD 10/14/22 - 10/18/22 905.96
31140 MCCULLEY STEVE 10/27/2022 Oct 14-18 2022 General Fund Police Lunch IACP Conference Chief S. McCulley PD 10/16/22 17.00 31140 MCCULLEY STEVE 10/27/2022 Oct 14-18 2022 General Fund Police Lyft IACP Conference Chief S. McCulley PD 10/14/22 29.18 31140 MCCULLEY STEVE 10/27/2022 Oct 14-18 2022 General Fund Police Lyft IACP Conference Chief S. McCulley PD 10/14/22 42.24 31140 MCCULLEY STEVE 10/27/2022 Oct 14-18 2022 General Fund Police Lyft IACP Conference Chief S. McCulley PD 10/15/22 10.99 31140 MCCULLEY STEVE 10/27/2022 Oct 14-18 2022 General Fund Police Lyft IACP Conference Chief S. McCulley PD 10/16/22 11.66 31140 MCCULLEY STEVE 10/27/2022 Oct 14-18 2022 General Fund Police Lyft IACP Conference Chief S. McCulley PD 10/16/22 7.71 31140 MCCULLEY STEVE 10/27/2022 Oct 14-18 2022 General Fund Police Lyft IACP Conference Chief S. McCulley PD 10/18/22 21.84 31140 MCCULLEY STEVE 10/27/2022 Oct 14-18 2022 General Fund Police Lyft IACP Conference Chief S. McCulley PD 10/18/22 66.74 31140 Total 1,574.52
31141 METROPOLITAN PLANNING GROUP 10/27/2022 2003494 General Fund Planning Contract Planning Svcs Sept 2022 54,431.25 31141 METROPOLITAN PLANNING GROUP 10/27/2022 2003494 General Fund Storm Water Compliance Review PW Sept 2022 552.50 31141 Total 54,983.75
31142 MISTER SOFTEE NORCAL 10/27/2022 2497 General Fund Administration (2) Hrs of Svcs Ice Cream & Toppings for Halloween Event 10/28/22 833.85
31142 Total 833.85
31143 MORRISEY COMPTON EDUCATIONAL CTR 10/27/2022 Inv #256 General Fund Refund Park Event Deposit Inv#256, 10/20/22 1,195.00 31143 Total 1,195.00
31144 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LLC 10/27/2022 270721039001 General Fund Building (3) dz Markers, (2) dz Pen, (1) dz Pads, (1) Stapler, (2) pk Paper, (3) bx Stick, (1) pk Sign Here Tape, (2) bx Tea, (1) Copy Holder, (1) Pencil Cup, (2) pk Post-it Note Bldg 259.70
31144 Total 259.70
31145 PAWINGTON LLC 10/27/2022 55868142 General Fund Police (8) Lg K9 Boarding Suite K9 Jessie D. Romero PD 520.00

Check# Vendor Name Check Date Invoice# Fund Dept Description Amount 31145 Total 520.00
31146 PERSSON DENISE 10/27/2022 Inv #313 General Fund Refund Park Event Deposit Inv#313, 10/22/22 600.00 31146 Total 600.00
31147 REYES FRANCESCA M 10/27/2022 Oct 26 2022 General Fund Administration Fuel Notary Trng & Exam F. Reyes Admin 10/24/22 45.01 31147 Total 45.01
31148 TAYLOR JEFF 10/27/2022 Oct 13 2022 General Fund Police Lunch Snap Chat Investigatios Trng J. Taylor PD 10/13/22 17.00 31148 TAYLOR JEFF 10/27/2022 Oct 18-19 2022 General Fund Police Lunch 3rd Annual Cyber Crime Trng J. Taylor PD 10/18/22 - 10/19/22 17.00
31148 Total 34.00
31149 WRNS STUDIO 10/27/2022 1500700103 Facilities Construction T & M Campus Pathway 34% Town Allocation Sept 2022 3,766.35 31149 WRNS STUDIO 10/27/2022 1500700103 Facilities Construction T & M Campus Pathway 66% Donation Allocation Sept 2022 7,311.15 31149 Total 11,077.50
Grand Total 862,356.36

Town of Atherton City Council Meeting Minutes – October 19, 2022

MINUTES
Town of Atherton
City Council
OCTOBER 19,2022

REGULAR MEETING
Mayor DeGolia called the meeting to order at 6:00 P.M.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL – Polito, Hawkins-Manuelian, Lewis, Vice Mayor Widmer, Mayor DeGolia – Present
PUBLIC COMMENTS – None

DEPARTMENTAL WRITTEN REPORTS
City Manager Rodericks introduced the item and there were no Council questions.

CONSENT CALENDAR (Items 1 – 5)

1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 21, OCTOBER 5, AND OCTOBER 11, 2022

2. BILLS AND CLAIMS SEPTEMBER 2022

3. ADOPT A RESOLUTION 22-22 APPROVING AN UPDATE OF THE TOWN'S CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE AND APPENDIX “A” DESIGNATING

POSITIONS IN THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE
Adopted Resolution 2022-22

4. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION RATIFYING PROCLAMATION OF A

STATE OF EMERGENCY IN THE TOWN AND AUTHORIZING

TELECONFERENCE MEETINGS OF TOWN LEGISLATIVE BODIES
PURSUANT TO THE BROWN ACT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54953(E) Adopted Resolution No. 22-20

Town of Atherton City Council Meeting Minutes – October 19, 2022

5. REVIEW AND CONSIDERATION OF REVISIONS TO THE RESOLUTION GOVERNING TOWN COMMITTEES AND COMMISSIONS.

Adopted Resolution No. 22-24
PUBLIC HEARING (Items 6 – 7)

6. CONDUCT THE PUBLIC HEARING AND INTRODUCE FOR FIRST READING, BY TITLE ONLY, AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND TITLE 15 OF THE
ATHERTON MUNICIPAL CODE ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE 2022

CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS CODE, RETAINING EXISTING
MODIFICATIONS; AND RATIFY THE FIRE REGULATIONS, AS ADOPTED BY THE MENLO PARK FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT.

Building Official Greenlee introduced the item and the Council conducted the public hearing. Fire Marshal Johnson also presented the Menlo Park Fire Protection District.

Council had a few questions for Fire Marshal Johnston, discussed which jurisdictions are are governed by the adoption and discussed the need to include Section 8 and City Attorney Ebrahimi suggested a strike-out to avoid confusion considering other upcoming ordinance amendments related to green building codes.

MOTION by Polito, Second by Lewis to conduct the public hearing and introduce for First Reading, by title only, an Ordinance amending Title 15 of the Atherton Municipal Code adopting by Reference the 2022 California Building Standards Code, retaining existing modifications; and ratify the fire regulations, as adopted by the Menlo Park Fire Protection District, striking out Section 8 in its entirety.

AYES: Polito, Hawkins, Lewis, Widmer, DeGolia
NOES
ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

7. CONDUCT THE PUBLIC HEARING AND WAIVE THE FIRST READING AND INTRODUCE BY TITLE ONLY, ORDINANCE NO. 2022-XX AMENDING CHAPTER 15.19 OF THE ATHERTON MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADOPTING THE 2022 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING CODE AND AN EV CHARGING

AND ALL ELECTRIFICATION REACH CODES, WITH EXCEPTIONS
Building Official Greenlee introduced the item and Mayor DeGolia opened the public hearing.

Rafael Reyes, Peninsula Clean Energy and Farad Farham addressed the council and discussed a variety of specifics related to electric vehicle charges, fire places, cooking facilities and other appliances.

Town of Atherton City Council Meeting Minutes – October 19, 2022

Council sought clarification related to when the ordinance would apply to home remodels and/or new construction.

Public Comment:
• Mike Chen
• Stacy Miles Holland, EPC Chair
• Walter Robinson
• Mike Childs
MOTION by Lewis, Second by Polito to introduce by title only, the first reading of an Ordinance amending Chapter 15.19 of the Atherton Municipal Code by Adopting the 2022 California Green Building Code and an Electrification Reach Code and EV Charging Ordinance, with exceptions to be effective January 1, 2023.

AYES: Polito, Hawkins, Lewis, Widmer, DeGolia
NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

REGULAR AGENDA (Items 8 – 10)

8. CONSIDERATION OF AN APPOINTMENT TO THE PARK AND

RECREATION COMMITTEE
City Clerk Suber introduced the item and introduced the applicant, Bob Roeser for the Park and Recreation vacancy for a term expiring June 2026.

Bob Roeser addressed the City Council and spoke to his interest in serving.

MOTION by DeGolia, Second by Lewis to appoint Bob Roeser to the Park and Recreation Committee to a term expiring on June 30, 2026.

AYES: Polito, Hawkins, Lewis, Widmer, DeGolia
NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

9. PLAYER CAPITAL TENNIS RENT CREDIT FOR TENNIS COURT CLOSURES

ASSOCIATED WITH THE OVERLAY OF THE TENNIS COURTS AT

HOLBROOK-PALMER PARK
Public Works Director Ovadia introduced the item and provided background information for Council consideration.

Public Comments:
• Greg Conlon
• Bob Roeser

Town of Atherton City Council Meeting Minutes – October 19, 2022

Michael Jessup, Player Capital Tennis addressed the reason for the request and responded to Council inquiry.

MOTION by Lewis, Second by Widmer to approve 50% of the reimbursement request in rent reduction.

AYES: Polito, Hawkins, Lewis, Widmer, DeGolia
NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

10. ADOPT A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE EL CAMINO REAL COMPLETE

STREETS GAP CLOSURE PROJECT AND SUBMITTING A GRANT

APPLICATION TO THE SAN MATEO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

AUTHORITY FOR PROJECT PLANNING FUNDS
Public Works Director Ovadia introduced the item and provided background information for Council consideration.

Council discussed the item including a conversation regarding the Town’s level of influence in participating in the project, conceptual layout/designs of the El Camino Real corridor and requirements for Green Infrastructure or Improvements.

MOTION by Lewis, Second by Widmer to approve Resolution 2022-23 for local support for the El Camino Real Gap complete streets closure project grant application to the San Mateo County Transportation Authority for project planning funds.

AYES: Polito, Hawkins, Lewis, Widmer, DeGolia
NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

COUNCIL REPORTS/COMMENTS – None

ADJOURN
Mayor DeGolia adjourned the meeting at 8:25 p.m.
________________________
Anthony Suber
City Clerk

Town of Atherton City Council Study Session Minutes – November 2, 2022

Mayor DeGolia called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m.
4:00 P.M. REGULAR AGENDA
ROLL CALL - Hawkins-Manuelian, Polito, Lewis, Vice Mayor Widmer, Mayor DeGolia –Present PUBLIC COMMENTS – NONE

1. PROVIDE FEEDBACK AND DIRECTION REGARDIN THE DESIGN OF THE ATHERTON TRAIN STATION REMODEL PROJECT.

Public Works Director Ovadia introduced the item and Council discussed the details on the plan and proposed design.

Council discussed color scheme, layout of the interior and exterior, signage, heating and cooling and a potential timeline of completion.

City Council provided direction for the City Manager to work with the Ad Hoc Subcommittee to begin work on the displays and interior layout of the Train Museum.

2. HCD COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE.

City Manager Rodericks introduced the item and noted potential community meeting dates, proposed topics to be discussed at the meetings.

Housing Consultant Costa Sanders discussed the response letter the Town received from the HCD and the feedback and analysis that was provided. She reviewed the list of comments from HCD and the required responses from the Town in specific areas such as nongovernmental constraints, sites for new housing development, the project ADU development program, and the need for a multi-family housing zoning site.

Council discussed the apparent need to include a multi-family housing overlay within Town.

Council continued to clarify and address the specifics related to what the Town’s ADU Program would consist of and comparisons were drawn to a residential property with an ADU, JADU and Main House versus some version of Townhomes or on a similar sized lot.

MINUTES
Town of Atherton
City Council
November 2, 2022

STUDY SESSION

Town of Atherton City Council Study Session Minutes – November 2, 2022

Public Comments:
• Greg Conlon
• David Arata
Mayor DeGolia requested an additional Council session to review and discuss the Town’s responses across a few core areas including housing at school sites, single family residential housing / zoning, and zoning possibilities at publicly owned land sites i.e. Holbrook-Palmer Park or the Corporation Yard.

COUNCIL REPORTS/COMMENTS – None

ADJOURN
Mayor DeGolia adjourned the meeting at 6:03 p.m.
________________________
Anthony Suber
City Clerk

Item No. 3
Town of Atherton
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT – CONSENT AGENDA
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL

GEORGE RODERICKS, CITY MANAGER
FROM: MIKE GREENLEE, CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL
DATE: NOVEMBER 16, 2022
SUBJECT: ADOPTION AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 15.19 OF THE ATHERTON MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADOPTING THE 2022

CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING CODE AND AN EV CHARGING

AND ALL ELECTRIFICATION REACH CODES, WITH

EXCEPTIONS

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the ordinance amending Chapter 15.19 of the Atherton Municipal Code by adopting the 2022 California Green Building Code and an EV Charging and All Electrification Reach Codes with exceptions. Direct the Building Official to file the amendments with State of California as required by law.

BACKGROUND
On November 3, 2021 a Study Session was held with representatives from PCE and TRC to discuss the options of an all-electric reach codes and EV Charging ordinance. On February 16, 2022 at the Regular City Council Meeting, the Council discussed the different options that could be considered for adoption.

City Council gave direction to draft an ordinance for an All-Electric Reach Codes with exceptions and for EV Charging and return the Ordinance to the Council in October, to coincide with adoption of the 2022 Edition of the California Green Building Code.

ANALYSIS
Staff has worked closely with Peninsula Clean Energy and the Statewide Program’s team to establish new construction EV requirements which align with local EV adoption trends, while providing flexibility for the builder and keeping construction costs as low as possible. The proposed Electric Vehicle Reach Code ensures that new buildings can charge a greater number of electric vehicles beyond State Code requirements and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. For EV Charging it is recommended as follows.

2 nd Reading and Adoption of the California Green Code, Reach Codes and EV Code NOVEMBER 16, 2022

Residential
Single Family Dwelling: One dedicated EV Ready Level 1 circuit, and one dedicated EV Ready Level 2 circuit.

ADUs provided with off-street parking shall provide either: A Level 1 EV Ready Circuit, a Level 2 EV Ready Circuit, or an EVCS.

Non-Residential, Non-Office When 10 or more parking spaces are constructed. 10% of the parking spaces, Level 2 EVCS and 10% Level 2 EV Capable.

Option to substitute one 48 kVA DC fast chargers for every 5 Level 2 EVCS.

The 2022 Cost-effectiveness Study: Single Family Construction and Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Cost Analysis is attached for reference only. Not for adoption.

With respect to Reach Codes, based on Council direction, staff is recommending an All-Electric Reach Code with the following exceptions and requirements.

Residential Buildings may contain non-electric indoor and outdoor cooking appliances, fireplaces and outdoor firepits.

Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU’s), Guest Houses, and Pool Houses shall be all-electric.

Emergency Generators may utilize fuel gas.

The Council may accept or change the exceptions and requirements noted above. The Council may also consider other exceptions for use of natural gas, such as water heaters, dryers, FAUs (Forced Air Units), and pool heaters.

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
This ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15308 as "Actions by Regulatory Agencies for the Protection of the Environment."

FISCAL IMPACT
No significant fiscal impact at this time.

GOAL ALIGNMENT
This Report and its contents are in alignment with the following Council Policy Goals:
• Goal Area F – Be Forward-Thinking, Well-Managed, and Well-Planned

2 nd Reading and Adoption of the California Green Code, Reach Codes and EV Code NOVEMBER 16, 2022

POLICY FOCUS
The Council’s policy discussion should revolve around adoption of the Reach Codes as mandates and the level or number of exceptions to be provided, if any.

PUBLIC NOTICE
Public notification was achieved by posting the agenda, with this agenda item being listed, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting in print and electronically. Information about the project is also disseminated via the Town’s electronic News Flash and Atherton Online. There are approximately 1,200 subscribers to the Town’s electronic News Flash publications. Subscribers include residents as well as stakeholders –to include, but be not limited to, media outlets, school districts, Menlo Park Fire Protection District, service provides (water, power, and sewer), and regional elected officials.

COMMISSION/COMMITTEE FEEDBACK/REFERRAL
This item has been before the Environmental Programs Committee.

ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit A – Ordinance No. 2022-____Amending Chapter 15.19 of the Atherton Municipal Code Exhibit B - 2022 Cost-effectiveness Study: Single Family New Construction (reference only) Exhibit C - Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Cost Analysis (reference only)

2299195.1 14537.002
ORDINANCE ???

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ATHERTON AMENDING CHAPTER 15.19 OF THE ATHERTON MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADOPTING THE 2022

CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING CODE BY REFERENCE, AS AMENDED BY LOCAL

REACH STANDARDS WITH EXCEPTIONS
WHEREAS, the Town of Atherton ("Town") has adopted the 2019 California Green Building Code, and
WHEREAS, the California Building Standards Commission ("BSC") has updated the 2019 California Green Building Code, releasing the 2022 California Green Building Code, which takes effect on January 1, 2023; and
WHEREAS, the Town has an interest in protecting the environment by reducing fossil fuel use; and
WHEREAS, the Town wishes to reduce fossil fuel use by supporting Electric Vehicle ("EV") infrastructure; and
WHEREAS, the Town wishes to reduce fossil fuel use in residential and commercial new construction; and
WHEREAS, the Town reserves the authority to regulate building code within Town limits to provide for the welfare of its residents by reducing fossil fuel usage; and WHEREAS, On November 3, 2021 a Study Session was held with representatives from Peninsula Clean Energy ("PCE") and TRC to discuss the options of an all-electric reach codes and EV Charging ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to adopt All-Electric Reach Codes with exceptions, The City Council of the Town of Atherton does hereby ordain as follows:

Section 1. PURPOSE AND AUTHORITY
The purpose of this amendment is to expand the Town's Green Building Code (Chapter 15.19) to adopt the most recent 2022 California Green Building Code and incorporate local All-Electric Reach Standards with exceptions, and EV Charging standards.

Section 2. AMENDMENTS TO ATHERTON MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 15.19 Chapter 15.19 is amended to read:

15.19.010 Adoption of the California Green Building Code, 2022 Edition.

That certain document, one copy of which is on file in the office of the building official of the town, being marked and designated as the “2019 California Green Building Standards Code or CalGreen,” as published by the California Building Standards Commission and identified as California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 11, is adopted as the green building code for the town regulating improving public health, safety and general welfare by enhancing the design and construction of buildings through the use of building concepts having a reduced negative impact

2299195.1 14537.002
or positive environmental impact for all buildings and structures and each and all of the regulations, provisions, and penalties of such 2019 California Green Building Standards Code, are referred to, adopted and made a part of this chapter as if fully set out in this chapter, subject to the amendments, deletions and additions thereto, as provided in this chapter. Effective January 1, 2023, the 2022 Edition of the California Green Buildings Standards Code shall replace the 2019 version and be adopted unless amended, as set forth in this chapter. To the extent that language or standards in CALGreen are incongruent with the language in this chapter, the language in this chapter is controlling, to the extent permitted by California state law.

15.19.020 Permit fees.

Permit fees are established and amended by resolution of the city council.

15.19.030 All-Electric Reach Standards.

Part 11 – California Green Building Code (CALGreen)
CHAPTER 2 DEFINITIONS
ADDITION. An extension or increase in floor area of an existing building or structure.

ALL-ELECTRIC BUILDING. A building that contains no combustion equipment or plumbing for combustion equipment serving space heating (including fireplaces), water heating (including pools and spas), cooking appliances (including barbeques), and clothes drying, within the building or building property lines, and instead uses electric heating appliances for service.

ALTERATION OR ALTER. Any construction or renovation to an existing structure other than repair for the purpose of maintenance or addition.

COMBUSTION EQUIPMENT. Any equipment or appliance used for space heating, water heating, cooking, clothes drying and/or lighting that uses fuel gas.

ELECTRIC HEATING APPLIANCE. A device that produces heat energy to create a warm environment by the application of electric power to resistance elements, refrigerant compressors, or dissimilar material junctions, as defined in the California Mechanical Code.

FUEL GAS. A gas that is natural or manufactured, including liquefied petroleum, or a mixture thereof.

NEWLY CONSTRUCTED (or NEW CONSTRUCTION). A newly constructed building (or new construction) does not include additions, alterations, or repairs.

CHAPTER 4 – RESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES
Division 4.1 PLANNING AND DESIGN
SECTION 4.106

SITE DEVELOPMENT

4.106.5 All-electric buildings. New construction buildings shall comply with Section 4.106.5.1

2299195.1 14537.002
or 4.106.5.2 so that they do not use combustion equipment or are ready to accommodate installation of electric heating appliances.

4.106.5.1. New construction. All newly constructed buildings and Accessory Dwelling Units, Guest Houses and Pool Houses shall be all-electric buildings.

Tenant improvements shall not be considered new construction. The final determination whether a project meets the definition of substantial reconstruction/alteration shall be made by the local enforcing agency.

Exceptions:

1. Residential Buildings may contain non-electric indoor and outdoor cooking appliances, fireplaces, and outdoor firepits.

2. Exceptions shall not apply to Accessory Dwelling Units, Guest Houses and Pool Houses.

3. Emergency Generators may utilize fuel gas.

4. If the applicant establishes that there is not an all-electric prescriptive compliance pathway for the building system under the California Building Energy Efficiency Standards, and that the building is not able to achieve the performance compliance Standard applicable to the building under the Energy Efficiency Standards using Commercially available technology and an approved calculation method, then the local enforcing agency may grant a modification. The applicant shall comply with Section

4.106.5.2.

Inactive Fuel Gas Infrastructure may be extended to spaces that are anticipated to qualify for the exceptions contained in this chapter. The inactive Fuel Gas Infrastructure shall not be activated, have a meter installed, or otherwise used unless the exemptions specified in this chapter have been confirmed as part of the issuance of a building permit. If the Fuel Gas Infrastructure is no longer serving one of the exceptions contained in this chapter, it shall either be capped, otherwise terminated, or removed by the entity previously entitled to the exemption, in a manner pursuant to all applicable Codes.

Town of Atherton shall have the authority to approve alternative materials, design and methods of construction or equipment per California Building Code Section 104.

4.106.5.2 Requirements for combustion equipment.

Where combustion equipment is allowed per Exceptions under 4.106.5.1, the construction drawings shall indicate electrical infrastructure and physical space accommodating the future installation of an electrical heating appliance in the following ways, as certified by a registered design professional or licensed electrical contractor:

1. Branch circuit wiring, electrically isolated and designed to serve all electrical heating appliances in accordance with manufacturer requirements and the California Electrical Code, including the appropriate voltage, phase, minimum amperage, and an electrical receptacle or junction box within five feet of the appliance that is accessible with no obstructions. Appropriately sized conduit may be installed in lieu of conductors; and

2299195.1 14537.002

2. Labeling of both ends of the unused conductors or conduit shall be with “For Future Electrical Appliance”; and

3. Reserved circuit breakers in the electrical panel for each branch circuit, appropriately labeled (i.e., “Reserved for Future Electric Range”), and positioned on the opposite end of the panel supply conductor connection; and

4. Connected subpanels, panelboards, switchboards, busbars, and transformers shall be sized to serve the future electrical heating appliances. The electrical capacity requirements shall be adjusted for demand factors in accordance with the California Electric Code; and

5. Physical space for future electrical heating appliances, including equipment footprint, and if needed a pathway reserved for routing of ductwork to heat pump evaporator(s), shall be depicted on the construction drawings. The footprint necessary for future electrical heating appliances may overlap with non-structural partitions and with the location of currently designed combustion equipment.

CHAPTER 5 – NONRESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES
Division 5.1 PLANNING AND DESIGN
SECTION 5.106 - SITE DEVELOPMENT

5.106.13 All-electric buildings. New construction buildings shall comply with Section

5.106.13.1 or 5.106.13.2 so that they do not use combustion equipment or are ready to facilitate future electrification.

5.106.13.1. New construction. All newly constructed nonresidential buildings shall be allelectric buildings.

Tenant improvements shall not be considered new construction. The final determination whether a project meets the definition of substantial reconstruction/alteration shall be made by the local enforcing agency.

Exceptions:

1. Nonresidential buildings containing kitchens located in a place of public accommodation, as defined in the California Building Code Chapter 2, may apply to the local enforcing agency for a modification to install commercial food heat-processing equipment served by fuel gas. The local enforcing agency may grant the modification if they find:
a. The need cannot be achieved equivalently with an electric heating appliance; and b. The applicant has installed energy efficient equipment based on Energy Star or California Energy Wise qualifications, as available.

The applicant shall comply with Section 5.106.13.2.

2299195.1 14537.002

2. If the applicant establishes that there is not an all-electric prescriptive compliance pathway for the building system under the California Building Energy Efficiency Standards, and that the building is not able to achieve the performance compliance standard applicable to the building under the Energy Efficiency Standards using commercially available technology and an approved calculation method, then the local enforcing agency may grant a modification. The applicant shall comply with Section 5.106.13.2

5.106.13.2. Requirements for combustion equipment.

Where combustion equipment is allowed per exceptions under Section 5.106.13.1, the construction drawings shall indicate electrical infrastructure and physical space accommodating the future installation of an electrical heating appliance in the following ways, as certified by a registered design professional or licensed electrical contractor:

1. Branch circuit wiring, electrically isolated and designed to serve all electrical heating appliances in accordance with manufacturer requirements and the California Electrical Code, including the appropriate voltage, phase, minimum amperage, and an electrical receptacle or junction box within five feet of the appliance that is accessible with no obstructions. Appropriately sized conduit may be installed in lieu of conductors; and

2. Labeling of both ends of the unused conductors or conduit shall be with “For Future Electrical Appliance”; and

3. Reserved circuit breakers in the electrical panel for each branch circuit, appropriately labeled (i.e., “Reserved for Future Electric Range”), and positioned on the opposite end of the panel supply conductor connection; and

4. Connected subpanels, panelboards, switchboards, busbars, and transformers shall be sized to serve the future electrical heating appliances. The electrical capacity requirements shall be adjusted for demand factors in accordance with the California Electric Code; and

5. Physical space for future electrical heating appliances, including equipment footprint, and if needed a pathway reserved for routing of ductwork to heat pump evaporator(s), shall be depicted on the construction drawings. The footprint necessary for future electrical heating appliances may overlap with non-structural partitions and with the location of currently designed combustion equipment.

15.19.040 Electric Vehicle Standards.

Section 202 Definitions:

AFFORDABLE HOUSING. Residential buildings that entirely consist of units below market rate and whose rents or sales prices are governed by local agencies to be affordable based on area median income.

AUTOMATIC LOAD MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (ALMS). A control system designed to manage load across one or more electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE), circuits, panels and to share electrical capacity and/or automatically manage power at each connection point. ALMS systems shall be designed to deliver no less than 3.3 kVa (208/240 volt, 16-ampere) to each EV

2299195.1 14537.002
Capable, EV Ready or EVCS space served by the ALMS, and meet the requirements of California Electrical Code Article 625. The connected amperage to the building site for the EV charging infrastructure shall not be lower than the required connected amperage per California Green Building Standards Code, Title 24 Part 11.

DIRECT CURRENT FAST CHARGING (DCFC). A parking space provided with electrical infrastructure that meets the following conditions:
i. A minimum of 48 kVa (480 volt, 100-ampere) capacity wiring. ii. Electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE) located within three (3) feet of the parking space providing a minimum capacity of 80-ampere.

ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATION (EVCS). A parking space that includes installation of electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE) at an EV Ready space. An EVCS space may be used to satisfy EV Ready space requirements. EVSE shall be installed in accordance with the California Electrical Code, Article 625.

ELECTRIC VEHICLE SUPPLY EQUIPMENT (EVSE). The electric vehicle charging connectors, attachment plugs, and all other fittings, devices, power outlets, or apparatus installed specifically for the purpose of transferring energy between the premises wiring and the electric vehicle.

LEVEL 2 EV CAPABLE. A parking space provided with electrical infrastructure that meets the following requirements:
i. Conduit that links a listed electrical panel with sufficient capacity to a junction box or receptacle located within three (3) feet of the parking space. The conduit shall be designed to accommodate at least 8.3 kVa (208/240 volt, 40-ampere) per parking.

Conduit shall have a minimum nominal trade size of 1 inch inside diameter and may be sized for multiple circuits as allowed by the California Electrical Code. Conduits shall be installed at a minimum in spaces that will be inaccessible after construction, either trenched underground or where penetrations to walls, floors, or other partitions would otherwise be required for future installation of branch circuits, and such additional elements deemed necessary by the Building Official. Construction documents shall indicate future completion of conduit from the panel to the parking space, via the installed inaccessible conduit.
ii. The electrical panel shall reserve a space for a 40-ampere overcurrent protective device space(s) for EV charging, labeled in the panel directory as “EV CAPABLE.” iii. Electrical load calculations shall demonstrate that the electrical panel service capacity and electrical system, including any on-site distribution transformer(s), have sufficient capacity to simultaneously charge all EVs at all required EV spaces at a minimum of 40 amperes.
iv. The parking space shall contain signage with at least a 12” font adjacent to the parking space indicating the space is EV Capable.

LEVEL 1 EV READY. A parking space that is served by a complete electric circuit with the following requirements:
i. A minimum of 2.2 kVa (110/120 volt, 20-ampere) capacity wiring. ii. A receptacle labeled “Electric Vehicle Outlet” or electric vehicle supply equipment located within three (3) feet of the parking space. If EVSE is provided the minimum capacity of the EVSE shall be 16-ampere.
iii. Conduit oversized to accommodate future Level 2 EV Ready (208/240 volt, 40-ampere) at each parking space.

2299195.1 14537.002
LEVEL 2 EV READY. A parking space that is served by a complete electric circuit with the following requirements:
i. A minimum of 8.3 kVa (208/240 volt, 40-ampere) capacity wiring. A receptacle labeled “Electric Vehicle Outlet” or electric vehicle supply equipment located within three (3) feet of the parking space. If EVSE is provided the minimum capacity of the EVSE shall be 30-ampere.

LOW POWER LEVEL 2 EV READY. A parking space that is served by a complete electric circuit with the following requirements:
i. A minimum of 4.1 kVA (208/240 Volt, 20-ampere) capacity wiring. ii. A receptacle labeled “Electric Vehicle Outlet” or electric vehicle supply equipment located within three (3) feet of the parking space. If EVSE is provided the minimum capacity of the EVSE shall be 16-ampere.
iii. Conduit oversized to accommodate future Level 2 EV Ready (208/240 volt, 40-ampere) at each parking space.

OFF-STREET LOADING SPACES. An area, other than a public street, public way, or other property (and exclusive of off-street parking spaces), permanently reserved or set aside for the loading or unloading of motor vehicles, including ways of ingress and egress and maneuvering areas. Whenever the term "loading space" is used, it shall, unless the context clearly requires otherwise, be construed as meaning off-street loading space. This excludes designated passenger loading/unloading.

SECTION 301

GENERAL
301.1 Scope.
301.1.1 Additions and alterations. [HCD] The mandatory provisions of Chapter 4 shall be applied to additions or alterations of existing residential buildings where the addition or alteration increases the building’s conditioned area, volume, or size. The requirements shall apply only to and/or within the specific area of the addition or alteration. (No change to existing California amendment.)
The mandatory provisions of Section 4.106.4.2 may apply to additions or alterations of existing parking facilities or the addition of new parking facilities serving existing multifamily buildings.

The mandatory provisions of Section 5.106.5.3 may apply to additions or alterations of existing parking facilities or the addition of new parking facilities serving existing nonresidential buildings.

NOTE: Repairs including, but not limited to, resurfacing, restriping, and repairing or maintaining existing lighting fixtures are not considered alterations for the purpose of this section.

DIVISION 4.1, PLANNING AND DESIGN
SECTION 4.106

SITE DEVELOPMENT

2299195.1 14537.002

4.106.4 Electric vehicle (EV) charging. Residential construction shall comply with Section

4.106.4.1 or 4.106.4.2, and 4.106.4.3, to facilitate future installation and use of EV chargers.

Electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE) shall be installed in accordance with the California Electrical Code, Article 625. For EVCS signs, refer to Caltrans Traffic Operations Policy Directive 13-01 (Zero Emission Vehicle Signs and Pavement Markings) or its successor(s).

Exceptions:

1. On a case-by-case basis, where the local enforcing agency has determined EV charging and infrastructure are not feasible based upon one or more of the following conditions:

1.1. Where there is no local utility power supply, or the local utility is unable to supply adequate power.

1.2 Where there is evidence suitable to the local enforcing agency substantiating that additional local utility infrastructure design requirements, directly related to the implementation of Section 4.106.4, may increase construction cost by an average of $4,500 per parking space for market rate housing or $400 per parking space for affordable housing. EV infrastructure shall be provided up to the level that would not exceed this cost for utility service.

2. Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units (JADU) without additional parking facilities and without electrical panel upgrade or new panel installation. ADUs and JADUs without additional parking but with electrical panel upgrades or new panels must have reserved breakers and electrical capacity according to the requirements of 4.106.4.1.

4.106.4.1 One- and two-family dwellings and townhouses with attached private garages.

4.106.4.1.1 New Construction. One parking space provided shall be a Level 2 EV Ready space. If a second parking space is provided, it shall be provided with a Level 1 EV Ready space.

4.106.4.1.2. Existing Building. Parking additions or electrical panel upgrades must have reserved breaker spaces and electrical capacity according to the requirements of 4.106.4.1.1.

NONRESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES
SECTION 5.106

SITE DEVELOPMENT

5.106.5.3 Electric vehicle (EV) charging. Construction to provide electric vehicle infrastructure and facilitate electric vehicle charging shall comply with Section 5.106.5.3 and shall be provided in accordance with regulations in the California Building Code and the California Electrical Code. Accessible EVCS shall be provided in accordance with the California Building Code Chapter 11B Section 11B-228.3. For EVCS signs, refer to Caltrans Traffic Operations Policy Directive 13-01 (Zero Emission Vehicle Signs and Pavement Markings) or its successor(s).

2299195.1 14537.002
Calculation for spaces shall be rounded up to the nearest whole number.

Exceptions:

1. On a case-by-case basis where the local enforcing agency has determined compliance with this section is not feasible based upon one of the following conditions:
a. Where there is no local utility power supply.
b. Where the local utility is unable to supply adequate power. c. Where there is evidence suitable to the local enforcement agency substantiating that additional local utility infrastructure design requirements, directly related to the implementation of Section 5.106.5.3, may increase construction cost by an average of $4,500 per parking space. EV infrastructure shall be provided up to the level that would not exceed this cost for utility service.

2. Parking spaces accessible only by automated mechanical car parking systems are not required to comply with this code section.

5.106.5.3.1 Nonresidential Occupancy Class B Offices – Shared Parking Space.

5.106.5.3.1.1 New Construction. Twenty percent (20%) of parking spaces shall be EVCS with Level 2 EV Read. ALMS shall be permitted to reduce load when multiple vehicles are charging. Thirty percent (30%) of parking spaces provided shall be Level 2 EV Capable.

5.106.5.3.1.2 Existing Buildings. When new parking facilities are added, or electrical systems or lighting of existing parking facilities are added or altered and the work requires a building permit, ten percent (10%) of the total number of parking spaces added or altered shall be EVCS with Level 2 EV Ready. Any existing EV Capable spaces on the building property required by the locally adopted codes at the time of building permit shall be upgraded to a minimum of Level 1 EV Ready. Upgrades shall be required at currently designated vehicle parking spaces. Upgrades shall be required for remaining parking spaces after meeting the accessibility requirements of California Building Code Chapters 11A and 11B.

5.106.5.3.3 All Other Nonresidential Occupancies – Shared Parking Facilities.

5.106.5.3.3.1 New Construction. Ten percent (10%) of parking spaces provided shall be EVCS with Level 2 EV Ready. ALMS shall be permitted to reduce load when multiple vehicles are charging. Ten percent (10%) of parking spaces provided shall be Level 2 EV Capable.

5.106.5.3.3.2 Existing Buildings. When new parking facilities are added, or electrical systems or lighting of existing parking facilities are added or altered and the work requires a building permit, ten percent (10%) of the total number of parking spaces added or altered shall be EVCS with Level 2 EV Ready. Any existing EV Capable spaces on the building property required by the locally adopted codes at the time of building permit shall be upgraded to a minimum of Level 1 EV Ready. Upgrades shall be required at currently designated vehicle parking spaces. Upgrades shall be required for remaining parking spaces after meeting the accessibility requirements of California Building Code Chapters 11A and 11B.

5.106.5.3.4 Direct current fast charging stations. One DCFC may be substituted for up to five (5) EVCS to meet the requirements of 5.106.5.3.1, 5.106.5.3.2, and 5.106.5.3.3. Where ALMS

2299195.1 14537.002
serve DCFC stations, the power demand from the DCFC shall be prioritized above Level 1 and Level 2 spaces.

5.106.5.4 Electric vehicle charging readiness. Construction shall comply with Section

5.106.5.4.1 to facilitate future installation of electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE).

Construction for warehouses, grocery stores and retail stores with planned off-street loading spaces shall also comply with Section 5.106.5.4.1 for future installation of medium- and heavyduty EVSE. Accessible EVCS shall be provided in accordance with the California Building Code Chapter 11B Section 11B-228.3. For EVCS signs, refer to Caltrans Traffic Operations Policy Directive 13-01 (Zero Emission Vehicle Signs and Pavement Markings) or its successor(s).

Exceptions:

1. On a case-by-case basis where the local enforcing agency has determined compliance with this section is not feasible based upon one of the following conditions:
a. Where there is no local utility power supply.
b. Where the local utility is unable to supply adequate power. c. Where there is evidence suitable to the local enforcing agency substantiating that additional local utility infrastructure design requirements, directly related to the implementation of Section 5.106.5.3, may increase construction cost by an average of $4,500 per parking space. EV infrastructure shall be provided up to the level that would not exceed this cost for utility service.

Section 3. SEVERABILITY
If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the Ordinance and the application of such provision to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby. To the extent that prior Town ordinances governed any portion of this Ordinance held invalid, such prior Town ordinances shall again become effective if any portion of this Ordinance is held invalid.

Section 4: EFFECTIVE DATE
This Ordinance shall be posted in at least three public places according to law and shall take effect and be in force on January 1, 2023.

Introduced on the ___ day of ____________________, 2022.

Passed and adopted as an ordinance of the City Council of the Town of Atherton at a regular meeting thereof held on the ___ day of __________________, 2022 by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Abstentions:
______________________________

2299195.1 14537.002
Mayor Rick DeGolia
ATTEST:
______________________________
Anthony Suber, City Clerk/ACM

Prepared by:

Frontier Energy, Inc
Misti Bruceri & Associates, LLC
Prepared for:

Kelly Cunningham, Codes and Standards Program, Pacific Gas and Electric Last modified: 2022/09/12
Revision: 1.0
2022 Cost-Effectiveness Study:

Single Family New
Construction

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Legal Notice
This report was prepared by Pacific Gas and Electric Company and funded by the California utility customers under the auspices of the California Public Utilities Commission.

Copyright 2022, Pacific Gas and Electric Company. All rights reserved, except that this document may be used, copied, and distributed without modification.

Neither PG&E nor any of its employees makes any warranty, express or implied; or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any data, information, method, product, policy or process disclosed in this document; or represents that its use will not infringe any privatelyowned rights including, but not limited to, patents, trademarks or copyrights.

Acronym List
2023 PV$ – Present value costs in 2023
ACH50 – Air Changes per Hour at 50 pascals pressure
differential
ACM – Alternative Calculation Method
ADU – Accessory Dwelling Unit
AFUE – Annual Fuel Utilization Efficiency
B/C – Lifecycle Benefit-to-Cost Ratio
BEopt – Building Energy Optimization Tool
BSC – Building Standards Commission
CA IOUs – California Investor-Owned Utilities
CASE – Codes and Standards Enhancement
CBECC-Res – Computer program developed by the California Energy Commission for use in demonstrating
compliance with the California Residential Building
Energy Efficiency Standards
CFI – California Flexible Installation
CFM – Cubic Feet per Minute
CO2 – Carbon Dioxide
CPAU – City of Palo Alto Utilities
CPUC – California Public Utilities Commission
CZ – California Climate Zone
DHW – Domestic Hot Water
DOE – Department of Energy
DWHR – Drain Water Heat Recovery
EDR – Energy Design Rating
EER – Energy Efficiency Ratio
EF – Energy Factor

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction GHG – Greenhouse Gas
HERS Rater – Home Energy Rating System Rater
HPA – High Performance Attic
HPWH – Heat Pump Water Heater
HSPF – Heating Seasonal Performance Factor
HVAC – Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning
IECC – International Energy Conservation Code
IOU – Investor Owned Utility
kBtu – kilo-British thermal unit
kWh – Kilowatt Hour
LBNL – Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
LCC – Lifecycle Cost
LLAHU – Low Leakage Air Handler Unit
VLLDCS – Verified Low Leakage Ducts in Conditioned Space MF – Multifamily
NEEA – Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance
NEM – Net Energy Metering
NPV – Net Present Value
NREL – National Renewable Energy Laboratory
PG&E – Pacific Gas and Electric Company
POU – Publicly-Owned-Utilities
PV – Photovoltaic
SCE – Southern California Edison
SDG&E – San Diego Gas and Electric
SEER – Seasonal Energy Efficiency Ratio
SF – Single Family
SMUD – Sacramento Municipal Utility District
SoCalGas – Southern California Gas Company
TDV – Time Dependent Valuation
Therm – Unit for quantity of heat that equals 100,000 British thermal units Title 24 – Title 24, Part 6
TOU – Time-Of-Use
UEF – Uniform Energy Factor
ZNE – Zero-net Energy

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Summary of Revisions
Date Description Reference (page or section)
9/12/2022 Original Release N/A

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Summary..........................................................................................................................................................1 1 Introduction................................................................................................................................................................3 2 Methodology and Assumptions...............................................................................................................................4

2.1 Analysis for Reach Codes..................................................................................................................................................... 4

2.1.1 Modeling ....................................................................................................................................................................... 4

2.1.2 Cost-Effectiveness ........................................................................................................................................................ 4

2.1.3 Utility Rates................................................................................................................................................................... 6

2.2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions ................................................................................................................................................. 6

2.3 Energy Design Rating........................................................................................................................................................... 7 3 Prototypes, Measure Packages, and Costs............................................................................................................8

3.3 Measure Definitions and Costs ........................................................................................................................................... 10

3.3.1 Efficiency, Solar PV, and Batteries ............................................................................................................................. 10

3.3.2 All-Electric................................................................................................................................................................... 16

3.4 Measure Packages ............................................................................................................................................................. 22 4 Results......................................................................................................................................................................24

4.1 2022 Metrics and Compliance............................................................................................................................................. 24

4.2 All-Electric Code Minimum Results ..................................................................................................................................... 26

4.3 All-Electric Plus Efficiency, PV, and Battery Results........................................................................................................... 29

4.4 Mixed Fuel Results ............................................................................................................................................................. 31

4.5 CARE Rate Comparison..................................................................................................................................................... 34

4.6 Utility Infrastructure Cost Sensitivity.................................................................................................................................... 36

4.7 Greenhouse Gas Reductions.............................................................................................................................................. 38 5 Summary ..................................................................................................................................................................41 6 References ...............................................................................................................................................................44 7 Appendices ..............................................................................................................................................................46

7.1 Map of California Climate Zones......................................................................................................................................... 46

7.2 Utility Rate Schedules......................................................................................................................................................... 47

7.2.1 Pacific Gas & Electric.................................................................................................................................................. 47

7.2.2 Southern California Edison ......................................................................................................................................... 53

7.2.3 Southern California Gas.............................................................................................................................................. 57

7.2.4 San Diego Gas & Electric............................................................................................................................................ 60

7.2.5 City of Palo Alto Utilities.............................................................................................................................................. 65

7.2.6 Sacramento Municipal Utilities District (Electric Only)................................................................................................. 68

7.2.7 Fuel Escalation Assumptions...................................................................................................................................... 69

7.3 Summary of Measures by Package .................................................................................................................................... 70

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Utility Tariffs Used Based on Climate Zone ............................................................................................................................ 6 Table 2: Prototype Characteristics................................................................ Page 69 of 364........................................................................................ 8 Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Table 3: Base case Characteristics of the Prototypes .......................................................................................................................... 9 Table 4: Base Package PV Capacities (kW-DC) ................................................................................................................................ 10 Table 5: Incremental Cost Assumptions ............................................................................................................................................. 13 Table 6. Single Family IOU Natural Gas Main Distribution Line Extension Costs............................................................................... 17 Table 7. Residential IOU Gas Line Extension Appliance Allowances ................................................................................................. 17 Table 8. Single Family IOU Natural Gas Service Line Extension Costs ............................................................................................. 17 Table 9. Single Family IOU Other Natural Gas Infrastructure Costs................................................................................................... 17 Table 10. Single Family IOU Total Natural Gas Infrastructure Costs1 ................................................................................................ 18 Table 11. Single Family CPAU Total Natural Gas Infrastructure Costs .............................................................................................. 18 Table 12. ADU Utility Infrastructure Costs .......................................................................................................................................... 19 Table 13: Lifetime of Water Heating & Space Conditioning Equipment Measures ............................................................................. 19 Table 14. Single Family All-Electric Appliance Incremental Costs...................................................................................................... 21 Table 15. ADU All-Electric Appliance Incremental Costs.................................................................................................................... 22 Table 16. Single Family Cost-Effectiveness: All-Electric Code Minimum............................................................................................ 27 Table 17. ADU Cost-Effectiveness: All-Electric Code Minimum.......................................................................................................... 28 Table 18. Single Family Cost-Effectiveness: All-Electric Energy Efficiency + Additional PV + Battery ............................................... 29 Table 19. ADU Cost-Effectiveness: All-Electric Energy Efficiency + Additional PV + Battery ............................................................. 30 Table 20. Single Family Cost-Effectiveness: Mixed Fuel Efficiency + PV + Battery............................................................................ 31 Table 21. ADU Cost-Effectiveness: Mixed Fuel Efficiency + PV + Battery ......................................................................................... 32 Table 22. Single Family Cost-Effectiveness: Mixed Fuel Packages ................................................................................................... 33 Table 23. ADU Cost-Effectiveness: Mixed Fuel Packages ................................................................................................................. 34 Table 24. On-Bill Cost-Effectiveness with CARE Tariffs: All-Electric Code Minimum ......................................................................... 35 Table 25. On-Bill Cost-Effectiveness with CARE Tariffs: Mixed Fuel Efficiency+ PV+ Battery Package ............................................ 36 Table 26. Single Family Cost-Effectiveness Comparison with Range of Natural Gas Utility Infrastructure Costs: All-Electric Code Minimum ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 37 Table 27. Single Family Cost-Effectiveness On-Bill Impact of CPUC Proposed Design on Gas Line Extension Allowances: AllElectric Code Minimum....................................................................................................................................................................... 38 Table 28: Single Family Greenhouse Gas Reductions (metric tons) .................................................................................................. 39 Table 29 ADU Greenhouse Gas Savings (metric tons) ...................................................................................................................... 40 Table 30. Summary of All-Electric Efficiency EDR2 Margins and Cost-Effectiveness ........................................................................ 42 Table 31. Summary of Mixed Fuel Efficiency EDR2 Margins and Cost-Effectiveness........................................................................ 43 Table 32: PG&E Baseline Territory by Climate Zone.......................................................................................................................... 48 Table 33: PG&E Monthly Gas Rate ($/therm)................................ Page 70 of 364 ..................................................................................................... 48 Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Table 34: PG&E Monthly CARE (GL-1) Gas Rate ($/therm)............................................................................................................... 48 Table 35: SCE Baseline Territory by Climate Zone ............................................................................................................................ 54 Table 36: SoCalGas Baseline Territory by Climate Zone ................................................................................................................... 58 Table 37: SoCalGas Monthly Gas Rate ($/therm) .............................................................................................................................. 58 Table 38: SDG&E Baseline Territory by Climate Zone ....................................................................................................................... 60 Table 39: SDG&E Monthly Gas Rate ($/therm).................................................................................................................................. 60 Table 40: CPAU Monthly Gas Rate ($/therm)..................................................................................................................................... 66 Table 41: Real Utility Rate Escalation Rate Assumptions................................................................................................................... 69 Table 42: Single Family Efficiency Package Measures ...................................................................................................................... 70 Table 43: Single Family Mixed Fuel Efficiency + PV + Battery Package Measures............................................................................ 71 Table 44: ADU Efficiency Package Measures .................................................................................................................................... 71 Table 45: Single Family All-Electric Code Compliant Efficiency Measures......................................................................................... 72 Table 46: ADU All-Electric Code Compliant Efficiency Measures....................................................................................................... 72

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: Single Family All-Electric Home Compliance Impacts ......................................................................................................... 24 Figure 2: ADU All-Electric Home Compliance Impacts ....................................................................................................................... 25 Figure 3: Single Family Four Gas Appliance Home Compliance Impacts........................................................................................... 25 Figure 4. Map of California climate zones........................................................................................................................................... 46

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Executive Summary
1 localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 Executive Summary
The California Codes and Standards (C&S) Reach Codes program provides technical support to local governments considering adopting a local ordinance (reach code) intended to support meeting local and/or statewide energy efficiency and greenhouse gas reduction goals. The program facilitates adoption and implementation of the code when requested by local jurisdictions by providing resources such as cost-effectiveness studies, model language, sample findings, and other supporting documentation.

This report documents cost-effectiveness analysis results for traditional new detached single family and detached accessory dwelling unit (ADUs) building types. It evaluates mixed fuel and all-electric package options in all sixteen California climate zones (CZs). Packages include combinations of efficiency measures, on-site renewable energy, and battery energy storage.

The following summarizes key results from the study:
• All-electric packages have lower GHG emissions than mixed-fuel packages in all cases, due to the clean power sources currently available from California’s power providers. • The Reach Codes Team found all-electric new construction to be feasible and cost effective based on TDV in all cases. In many cases all-electric code minimum construction results in an increase in utility costs and is not cost-effective On-Bill. Some exceptions include the SMUD and CPAU territories where lower electricity rates relative to natural gas rates result in lower overall utility bills. • The 2022 Title 24 Code’s new source energy metric combined with the heat pump baseline encourage allelectric construction, providing an incentive that allows for some amount of prescriptively required building efficiency to be traded off. This compliance benefit for all-electric homes highlights a unique opportunity for jurisdictions to incorporate efficiency into all-electric reach codes. Efficiency and electrification have symbiotic benefits and are both critical for decarbonization of buildings. As demand on the electric grid is increased through electrification, efficiency can reduce the negative impacts of additional electricity demand on the grid, reducing the need for increased generation and storage capacity, as well as the need to upgrade upstream transmission and distribution equipment. The Reach Codes Team recommends that jurisdictions adopting an all-electric reach code for single family buildings also include an efficiency requirement with EDR2 margins consistent with the all-electric code minimum package.
• The code compliance margins for the ADU all-electric code minimum package are lower than for the single family prototype and code compliance can be more challenging for smaller dwelling units. As a result, the Reach Codes Team does not recommend an additional efficiency requirement for all-electric ADU ordinances. • Electrification combined with increased PV capacity results in utility cost savings and was found to be On-Bill cost effective in all cases. These results were based on today’s net energy metering rules and do not account for future changes to utility agreements, which are expected to decrease the value of PV to the consumer. • For jurisdictions interested in a reach code that allows for mixed fuel buildings, the mixed fuel efficiency, PV, and battery package was found to be cost effective based on TDV in all cases. Cost effectiveness was marginal because of the high cost of the battery system. EDR2 margins ranged from 7 to 30 for the costeffective packages. • Applying the CARE rates has the overall impact to increase utility cost savings for an all-electric building compared to a code compliant mixed fuel building, improving On-Bill cost-effectiveness.

This report presents measures or measure packages that local jurisdictions may consider adopting to achieve energy savings and emissions reductions beyond what will be accomplished by enforcing minimum state requirements, the 2022 Building Energy Efficiency Standards (Title 24, Part 6), effective January 1, 2023.

Local jurisdictions may also adopt ordinances that amend different Parts of the California Building Standards Code or may elect to amend other state or municipal codes. The decision regarding which code to amend will determine the specific requirements that must be followed for an ordinance to be legally enforceable. For example, jurisdictions that only want to require all-electric construction may amend Part 11 instead of Part 6 of the CA Building Code requiring Page 73 of 364 Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Executive Summary
2 localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 review and approval by the Building Standards Commission (BSC) but not the California Energy Commission (Energy Commission). Reach codes that amend Part 6 of the CA Building Code and require energy performance beyond state code minimums must demonstrate the proposed changes are cost-effective and obtain approval from the Energy Commission. Although a cost-effectiveness study is only required to amend Part 6 of the CA Building Code, this study provides valuable context for jurisdictions pursuing other ordinance paths to understand the economic impacts of any policy decision. This study documents the estimated costs, benefits, energy impacts and greenhouse gas emission reductions that may result from implementing an ordinance based on the results to help residents, local leadership, and other stakeholders make informed policy decisions.

Model ordinance language and other resources are posted on the C&S Reach Codes Program website at LocalEnergyCodes.com. Local jurisdictions that are considering adopting an ordinance may contact the program for further technical support at [email protected].

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Introduction
3 localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 1 Introduction
This report documents cost-effective combinations of measures that exceed the minimum state requirements, the 2022 Building Energy Efficiency Standards, effective January 1, 2023, for newly constructed single family buildings. This report was developed in coordination with the California Statewide Investor-Owned Utilities (CA IOUs) Codes and Standards Program, key consultants, and engaged cities—collectively known as the Reach Codes Team.

The analysis considers traditional detached single family and detached accessory dwelling unit (ADUs) building types and evaluates mixed fuel and all-electric package options in all sixteen California climate zones (CZs). 1 Packages include combinations of efficiency measures, on-site renewable energy, and battery energy storage.

The California Building Energy Efficiency Standards Title 24, Part 6 (Title 24) (California Energy Commission, 2021a) is maintained and updated every three years by two state agencies: the California Energy Commission (Energy Commission) and the Building Standards Commission (BSC). In addition to enforcing the code, local jurisdictions have the authority to adopt local energy efficiency ordinances—or reach codes—that exceed the minimum standards defined by Title 24 (as established by Public Resources Code Section 25402.1(h)2 and Section 10-106 of the Building Energy Efficiency Standards). Local jurisdictions must demonstrate that the requirements of the proposed ordinance are costeffective and do not result in buildings consuming more energy than is permitted by Title 24. In addition, the jurisdiction must obtain approval from the Energy Commission and file the ordinance with the BSC for the ordinance to be legally enforceable.

The Department of Energy (DOE) sets minimum efficiency standards for equipment and appliances that are federally regulated under the National Appliance Energy Conservation Act, including heating, cooling, and water heating equipment (E-CFR, 2020). Since state and local governments are prohibited from adopting higher minimum efficiencies than the federal standards require, the focus of this study is to identify and evaluate cost-effective packages that do not include high efficiency heating, cooling, and water heating equipment. High efficiency appliances are often the easiest and most affordable measures to increase energy performance. While federal preemption limits reach code mandatory requirements for covered appliances, in practice, builders may install any package of compliant measures to achieve the performance requirements.
1 See Appendix 7.1 Map of California Climate Zones for a graphical depiction of climate zone locations.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Methodology and Assumptions
4 localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 2 Methodology and Assumptions

2.1 Analysis for Reach Codes
This section describes the approach to calculating cost-effectiveness including benefits, costs, metrics, and utility rate selection.

2.1.1 Modeling
The Reach Codes Team performed energy simulations using software approved for 2022 Title 24 Code compliance analysis, CBECC-Res 2022.1.0.

The general approach applied in this analysis is to evaluate performance and determine cost effectiveness of various energy efficiency upgrade measures, individually and as packages, in single family buildings. Using the 2022 baseline as the starting point, prospective measures and packages were identified and modeled in each of the prototypes to determine the projected energy (therm and kWh) and compliance impacts. A large set of parametric runs were conducted to evaluate various options and develop packages of measures that met or exceeded minimum code performance. The analysis utilized a Python based parametric tool to automate and manage the generation of CBECCRes input files. This allowed for quick evaluation of various efficiency measures across multiple climate zones and prototypes and improved quality control. The batch process functionality of CBECC-Res was utilized to simulate large groups of input files at once.

2.1.2 Cost-Effectiveness

2.1.2.1 Benefits
This analysis used two different metrics to assess cost effectiveness of the proposed upgrades. Both methodologies require estimating and quantifying the incremental costs and energy savings associated with each energy efficiency measure. The main difference between the methodologies is the manner in which they value energy and thus the cost savings of reduced or avoided energy use:

Utility Bill Impacts (On-Bill): Customer-based lifecycle cost (LCC) approach that values energy based upon estimated site energy usage and customer utility bill savings using today’s electricity and natural gas utility tariffs. Total savings are estimated over a 30-year duration and include discounting of future costs and energy cost inflation.

Time Dependent Valuation (TDV): Energy Commission LCC methodology, which is intended to capture the total value or cost of energy use over 30 years. This method accounts for long-term projected costs, such as the cost of providing energy during peak periods of demand and other societal costs, such as projected costs for carbon emissions, as well as grid transmission and distribution impacts. This metric values energy use differently depending on the fuel source (natural gas, electricity, and propane), time of day, and season. For example, electricity used (or saved) during peak periods has a much higher value than electricity used (or saved) during off-peak periods due to the less inefficient energy generation sources providing peak electricity (Horii, Cutter, Kapur, Arent, & Conotyannis, 2014).

This is the methodology used by the Energy Commission in evaluating cost effectiveness for efficiency measures in Title 24, Part 6.

2.1.2.2 Costs
The Reach Codes Team assessed the incremental costs of the measures and packages over a 30-year lifecycle.

Incremental costs represent the equipment, installation, replacements, and maintenance costs of the proposed measure relative to the 2022 Title 24 Standards minimum requirements or standard industry practices. Present value of replacement cost is included for measures with lifetimes less than the evaluation period.

In calculating On-Bill cost effectiveness, incremental first costs were assumed to be financed into a mortgage or loan with a 30-year loan term and four percent interest rate. Financing was not applied to future replacement or maintenance costs. In calculating TDV cost effectiveness, incremental first costs were not assumed to be financed into a mortgage or loan.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Methodology and Assumptions
5 localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12

2.1.2.3 Metrics
Cost-effectiveness is presented using net present value (NPV) and benefit-to-cost (B/C) ratio metrics.

NPV Savings: The lifetime NPV savings is reported as a cost-effectiveness metric, Equation 1 demonstrates how this is calculated. If the net savings of a measure or package is positive, it is considered cost-effective. Negative savings represent net costs.

B/C Ratio: Ratio of the present value (PV) of all benefits to the present value of all costs over 30 years (PV benefits divided by PV costs). The criteria benchmark for cost effectiveness is a B/C ratio greater than one. A value of one indicates the NPV of the savings over the life of the measure is equivalent to the NPV of the lifetime incremental cost of that measure. A value greater than one represents a positive return on investment. The B/C ratio is calculated according to Equation 2.

Equation 1
𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁 𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 = 𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜 𝑙𝑙 𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙 𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙 𝑏𝑏 − 𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜 𝑙𝑙 𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙 𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙 𝑐𝑐 Equation 2
𝐵𝐵 − − 𝐶𝐶 𝑅𝑅 = 𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜 𝑙𝑙 𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙 𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙 𝑏𝑏
𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜 𝑙𝑙 𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙 𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙 𝑐𝑐
Improving the efficiency of a project often requires an initial incremental investment. In most cases the benefit is represented by annual On-Bill utility or TDV savings, and the cost is represented by incremental first cost and replacement costs. However, some packages result in initial construction cost savings (negative incremental cost), and either energy cost savings (positive benefits), or increased energy costs (negative benefits). In cases where both construction costs and energy-related savings are negative, the construction cost savings are treated as the ‘benefit’ while the increased energy costs are the ‘cost.’ In cases where a measure or package is cost-effective immediately (i.e., upfront construction cost savings and lifetime energy cost savings), B/C ratio cost effectiveness is represented by “>1”.

The lifetime costs or benefits are calculated according to Equation 3.

Equation 3
𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜 𝑙𝑙 𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙 𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙 𝑐𝑐 𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜 𝑏𝑏 = �(𝐴𝐴 𝐴𝐴 𝑐𝑐 𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜 𝑏𝑏 )𝑡𝑡
(1 + )𝑡𝑡
𝑛𝑛
𝑡𝑡=0
Where:
• n = analysis term in years
• r = discount rate
The following summarizes the assumptions applied in this analysis to both methodologies. • Analysis term of 30 years
• Real discount rate of three percent
TDV is a normalized monetary format and there is a unique procedure for calculating the present value benefit of TDV energy savings. The present value of the energy cost savings in dollars is calculated by multiplying the TDV savings (reported by the CBECC-Res simulation software) by a NPV factor developed by the Energy Commission (see (Energy + Environmental Economics, 2020)). The 30-year residential NPV factor is $0.173/kTDV kBtu for the 2022 code cycle.

Equation 4
𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇 𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜 𝑙𝑙 𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙 𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙 𝑏𝑏 = 𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇 𝑒𝑒 ∗ 𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Methodology and Assumptions
6 localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12

2.1.3 Utility Rates
In coordination with the CA IOU rate team (comprised of representatives from Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E), Southern California Edison (SCE) and San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E)) and two Publicly-Owned-Utilities (POUs) (Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) and City of Palo Alto Utilities (CPAU)), the Reach Codes Team determined appropriate utility rates for each climate zone in order to calculate utility costs and determine On-Bill cost effectiveness for the proposed measures and packages. The utility tariffs, summarized in Table 1, were determined based on the most prevalent active rate in each territory. Utility rates were applied to each climate zone based on the predominant IOU serving the population of each zone, with a few climate zones evaluated multiple times under different utility scenarios. Climate Zones 10 and 14 were evaluated with both SCE/SoCalGas and SDG&E tariffs since each utility has customers within these climate zones. Climate Zone 5 is evaluated under both PG&E and SoCalGas natural gas rates. Two POU or municipal utility rates were also evaluated: SMUD in Climate Zone 12 and CPAU in Climate Zone 4.

First-year utility costs were calculated using hourly electricity and natural gas output from CBECC-Res and applying the utility tariffs summarized in Table 1. Annual costs were also estimated for customers eligible for the CARE tariff discounts on both electricity and natural gas bills. Appendix 7.2 Utility Rate Schedules includes details of each utility tariff. For cases with PV generation, the approved NEM2 tariffs were applied along with minimum daily use billing and mandatory non-bypassable charges. Future changes to the NEM tariffs are likely and the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) has issued a proposed decision with suggested changes that is expected to be finalized in 2022. 2 The ADU was assumed to have separate electric and gas meters from the main house.

Table 1. Utility Tariffs Used Based on Climate Zone
Climate Zones Electric / Gas Utility Electricity Natural Gas IOUs
1-5,11-13,16 PG&E / PG&E E-TOU Option C G1
5 PG&E / SoCalGas E-TOU Option C GR
6, 8-10, 14, 15 SCE / SoCalGas TOU-D Option 4-9 GR
7, 10, 14 SDG&E / SDG&E TOU-DR-1 GR
POUs
4 CPAU / CPAU E-1 G-2
12 SMUD / PG&E R-TOD (RT02) G1
Utility rates are assumed to escalate over time according to the assumptions from the CPUC 2021 En Banc hearings on utility costs through 2030 (California Public Utilities Commission, 2021a). Escalation rates through the remainder of the 30-year evaluation period are based on the escalation rate assumptions within the 2022 TDV factors. See Appendix 7.2.7 Fuel Escalation Assumptions for details.

2.2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions
The analysis reports the greenhouse gas (GHG) emission estimates based on assumptions within CBECC-Res. There are 8,760 hourly multipliers accounting for time dependent energy use and carbon based on source emissions, including renewable portfolio standard projections. There are two strings of multipliers—one for Northern California 2 https://www.cpuc.ca.gov/nemrevisit

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Methodology and Assumptions
7 localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 climate zones, and another for Southern California climate zones. 3 GHG emissions are reported as average annual metric tons of CO2 equivalent over the 30-year building lifetime.

2.3 Energy Design Rating
The 2019 Title 24 Code introduced California’s Energy Design Rating (EDR) as the primary metric to demonstrate compliance with the energy code for single family buildings. This EDR was based on the hourly TDV energy use from a building that is compliant with the 2006 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) as the Reference Building. The Reference Building has an EDR score of 100 while a zero-net energy (ZNE) home has an EDR score of zero. While the Reference Building is used to set the scale for the rating, the Proposed Design is still compared to the Standard Design based on the Title 24 prescriptive baseline assumptions to determine compliance.

In the 2022 Title 24 Code a second new EDR metric was introduced based on hourly source energy. The two EDR metrics are described below:
• EDR1 is calculated based on source energy.
• EDR2 is calculated based on TDV energy.

Furthermore, EDR2 is composed of two components for compliance purposes. The Efficiency EDR2 which represents the energy efficiency features of a home. The PV/Flexibility EDR2 includes the effects of PV and battery storage systems. Total EDR2 combines both the Efficiency and PV/Flexibility impacts. While the Efficiency EDR2 does not include the full impact of a battery system, it can include a self-utilization credit for batteries if certain conditions are met.

For a new, single family building to comply with the 2022 Title 24 Code, three criteria are required:

1. The Proposed EDR1 must be equal to or less than the EDR1 of the Standard Design, and

2. The Proposed Efficiency EDR2 must be equal to or less than the Efficiency EDR2 of the Standard Design, and

3. The Proposed Total EDR2 must be equal to or less than the Total EDR2 of the Standard Design.

This concept, consistent with California’s “loading order” which prioritizes energy efficiency ahead of renewable generation, requires projects meet a minimum Efficiency EDR2 before PV is credited but allows for PV to be traded off with additional efficiency when meeting the Total EDR2. A project may improve on building efficiency beyond the minimum required and subsequently reduce the PV generation capacity necessary to achieve the required Total EDR2.

However, it may not increase the size of the PV system and trade this off with a reduction of efficiency measures.

Results from this analysis are presented as EDR Margin, a reduction in the EDR score relative to the Standard Design.

EDR Margin is a better metric to use than absolute EDR in the context of a reach code because absolute values vary based on the home design and characteristics such as size and orientation. Referencing the margin results in similar requirements across a variety of designs. This approach aligns with how compliance is reported for the 2019 and 2022 Title 24 Code. The EDR Margin is calculated according to Equation 5.

Equation 5
𝐸𝐸 𝑀𝑀 = 𝑆𝑆 𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 𝑆𝑆 𝐸𝐸 − 𝑃𝑃 𝐸𝐸
3 CBECC-Res multipliers are the same for CZs 1-5 and 11-13 (Northern California), while there is another set of multipliers for CZs 6-10 and 14-16 (Southern California).

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Prototypes, Measure Packages, and Costs
8 localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 3 Prototypes, Measure Packages, and Costs
This section describes the prototypes and the scope of analysis drawing from previous 2019 Reach Code research where necessary.

3.1 Prior Reach Code Research
In 2019, the Reach Codes Team analyzed the cost-effectiveness of residential single family new construction projects for mixed-fuel and all-electric packages (Statewide Reach Codes Team, 2019). Using this analysis, several cities and counties in California adopted local energy code amendments encouraging or requiring that low-rise residential new construction be all-electric. As there were few changes to the single family requirements, this analysis for the 2022 code cycle leveraged the work completed for the 2019 reports. Initial efficiency packages were based on the final packages from the 2019 research and were revised to reflect measure specifications and costs based on new data.

3.2 Prototype Characteristics
The Energy Commission defines building prototypes which it uses to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of proposed changes to Title 24 requirements. For the 2022 code cycle the Energy Commission used two single family prototypes, both of which were used in this analysis. Additional details on the prototypes can be found in the Alternative Calculation Method (ACM) Approval Manual (California Energy Commission, 2018).

Additionally, a detached new construction ADU prototype was developed to reflect recent trends in California construction related to the high cost of housing (TRC, 2021). ADUs are additional dwelling units typically built on the property of an existing single-family parcel. ADUs are defined as new construction in the energy code when they are ground-up developments, do not convert an existing space to livable space, and are not attached to the primary dwelling. The evaluated prototype is not representative of an attached ADU constructed as an addition to an existing home.

The Reach Codes Team leveraged prior research to define the detached ADU baseline and measure packages. The house size and number of bedrooms were based on data from a survey conducted by UC Berkeley’s Center for Community Innovation (UC Berkeley Center for Community Innovation, 2021). The survey found that the average square footage for new ADUs statewide is 615 square feet and that the majority (61 percent) of new ADUs have one bedroom.

Table 2 describes the basic characteristics of each prototype. The prototypes have equal geometry on all walls, windows and roof to be orientation neutral.

Table 2: Prototype Characteristics
Characteristic Single Family
One-Story
Single Family
Two-Story ADU
Conditioned Floor Area 2,100 ft2 2,700 ft2 625 ft2
Num. of Stories 1 2 1
Num. of Bedrooms 3 3 1
Window-to-Floor Area Ratio 20% 20% 20%
The Energy Commission’s protocol for the two single family prototypes is to weight the simulated energy impacts by a factor that represents the distribution of single-story and two-story homes being built statewide. This study assumed 50 percent single-story and 50 percent two-story. Simulation results in this study are characterized according to this ratio, which is approximately equivalent to a 2,400-square foot (ft2) house. 4 ADU results are presented separately. 42,400 ft2 = (50% x 2,100 ft2) + (50% x 2,700 ft2)

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Prototypes, Measure Packages, and Costs
9 localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 The methodology used in the analyses for each of the prototypical building types begins with a design that precisely meets the minimum 2022 prescriptive requirements (zero compliance margin). Table 150.1-A in the 2022 Standards (California Energy Commission, 2021a) lists the prescriptive measures that determine the baseline design in each climate zone. Other features are consistent with the Standard Design in the ACM Reference Manual (California Energy Commission, 2022), and are designed to meet, but not exceed, the minimum requirements. Each prototype building has the following features:
• Slab-on-grade foundation.
• Vented attic.
• High performance attic in climate zones where prescriptively required (CZ 4, 8-16) with insulation installed at the ceiling and below the roof deck per Option B. (Refer to Table 150.1-A in the 2022 Standards.) • Ductwork located in the attic.

Table 3 describes additional characteristics as they were applied to the base case energy model in this analysis. In a shift from the 2019 Standards, the 2022 Standards define a prescriptive fuel source for space heating and water heating establishing a heat pump baseline. In each climate zone one heat pump is prescriptively required. In most climate zones the prescriptive base case includes a heat pump water heater and a natural gas furnace for space heating. In Climate Zones 3, 4, 13, and 14 this is reversed, where the base case has a heat pump space heater and natural gas tankless water heater.

Table 3: Base case Characteristics of the Prototypes
Characteristic Single Family ADU
Space
Heating/Cooling1,2
CZs 1-2,5-12,15-16: Natural gas furnace, split
AC 80 AFUE, 14 SEER, 11.7 EER
CZs 3-4,13-14: Split heat pump – 8.2 HSPF,
14 SEER, 11.7 EER
Same as single family
Water Heater1,2
CZs 1-2,5-12,15-16: Heat pump water heater
(HPWH) UEF = 2.0 located in the garage
CZs 3-4,13-14: Natural gas tankless –
UEF = 0.81
Same equipment type as SF
except HPWH is located inside
the conditioned space with the
supply air ducted from outside3
Hot Water
Distribution
Code minimum, all hot water lines insulated
CZs 1,16: Basic compact distribution credit Same as single family Drain Water Heat
Recovery Efficiency CZ 16: 65%, equal flow to shower & water heater Same as single family Cooking Natural Gas Same as single family
Clothes Drying Natural Gas Same as single family
PV System
Sized to offset 100% of electricity use for space
cooling, ventilation, lighting, appliance, & other
miscellaneous electric loads. Size differs by
climate zone ranging from 2.64 kW to 5.33 kW,
see Table 4.

PV is not required when the PV
system size required based on the
prescriptive calculations is less
than 1.8 kW, as is the case in
Climate Zones 1-9, 12, 14, and

16. In the other climate zones the
PV size ranges from 1.74 kW to

2.56 kW, see Table 4.
4 1 Equipment efficiencies are equal to minimum federal appliance efficiency standards. 2 AFUE = annual fuel utilization efficiency. SEER = seasonal energy efficiency ratio. EER = energy efficiency ratio.

HSPF = heating seasonal performance factor. UEF = uniform energy factor. 3 This version of CBECC-Res used in this analysis did not have the capability to directly model ducted HPWHs even though this configuration is called out as the Standard Design in the 2022 ACM (California Energy Commission, 2022). This was modeled by indicating that the tank is located within the conditioned space with the compressor unit located outside. 4 Exception 2 to Section 150.1(c)14 states that “no PV system is required when the minimum PV system size specified by section 150.1(c)14 is less than 1.8 kWdc.” In this analysis this exception is applied based on the sizes calculated per Equation150.1-C of Section 150.1(c)14. The performance software sizes the PV system based on the estimated energy use, which differs slightly from the prescriptive sizing. As a result, the baseline PV capacity from the performance software for Climate Zone 10 is less than 1.8 kWdc. Page 81 of 364
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Prototypes, Measure Packages, and Costs
10 localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 Table 4 summarizes the PV capacities for the base case packages.

Table 4: Base Package PV Capacities (kW-DC)
Climate
Zone
Base Package
Single
Family ADU
CZ01 3.54 0
CZ02 2.99 0
CZ03 2.81 0
CZ04 2.90 0
CZ05 2.62 0
CZ06 2.64 0
CZ07 2.84 0
CZ08 3.13 0
CZ09 2.97 0
CZ10 3.19 1.74
CZ11 3.91 2.07
CZ12 3.12 0
CZ13 4.08 2.11
CZ14 3.16 0
CZ15 5.33 2.56
CZ16 2.90 0

3.3 Measure Definitions and Costs
Measures evaluated in this study fall into two categories: those associated with general efficiency, onsite generation, and demand flexibility and those associated with building electrification. The Reach Codes Team selected measures based on cost-effectiveness as well as decades of experience with residential architects, builders, and engineers along with general knowledge of the relative consumer acceptance of many measures.

The following sections describe the details and incremental cost assumptions for each of the measures. Incremental costs represent the equipment, installation, replacement, and maintenance costs of the proposed measures relative to the base case. 5 Replacement costs are applied for roofs, mechanical equipment, PV inverters and battery systems over the 30-year evaluation period. Maintenance costs are estimated for PV systems, but not any other measures.

Costs were estimated to reflect costs to the building owner. All costs are provided as present value in 2023 (2023 PV$).

The Reach Codes Team obtained measure costs from distributors, contractors, literature review, and online sources such as Home Depot and RS Means. Contractor markups are incorporated. These are the Reach Codes Team best estimate of average costs statewide. However, it's recognized that local costs may differ, and that inflation and supply chain issues may also impact costs.

3.3.1 Efficiency, Solar PV, and Batteries
Following are descriptions of each of the efficiency, PV, and battery measures evaluated under this analysis and applied in at least one of the packages presented in this report. Table 5 summarizes the incremental cost assumptions for each of these measures.
5 All first costs are assumed to be financed in a mortgage and interest costs due to financing are included in the incremental costs. See Section 2.1.2 for details.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Prototypes, Measure Packages, and Costs
11 localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 Reduced Infiltration (ACH50): Reduce infiltration in single family homes from the default infiltration assumption of five (5) air changes per hour at 50 Pascals (ACH50) 6 by 40 percent to 3 ACH50. HERS rater field verification and diagnostic testing of building air leakage according to the procedures outlined in the 2022 Reference Appendices RA3.8 (California Energy Commission, 2021b).

Lower U-Factor Fenestration: Reduce window U-factor to 0.24. The prescriptive U-factor is 0.30 in all climates.

Higher SHGC Fenestration: Increase solar heat gain coefficient (SHGC) to 0.50 in climate zones where heating loads dominate. The baseline solar heat gain coefficient (SHGC) applied in the Standard Design is 0.35 in Climate Zones 1, 3, 5, and 16.

Cool Roof: Install a roofing product that’s rated by the Cool Roof Rating Council to have an aged solar reflectance (ASR) equal to or greater than 0.25. Steep-sloped roofs were assumed in all cases. The 2022 Title 24 specifies a prescriptive ASR of 0.20 for Climate Zones 10 through 15.

Increased Ceiling Insulation: Increase ceiling level insulation in a vented attic to R-49 or R-60 insulation.

Slab Insulation: Install R-10 perimeter slab insulation at a depth of 16-inches. This measure doesn’t apply to Climate Zone 16 where slab insulation is required prescriptively.

Low Pressure Drop Ducts: Upgrade the duct distribution system to reduce external static pressure and meet a maximum fan efficacy of 0.35 Watts per cfm. This may involve upsizing ductwork, reducing the total effective length of ducts, and/or selecting low pressure drop components such as filters. Fan watt draw must be verified by a HERS rater according to the procedures outlined in the 2022 Reference Appendices RA3.3 (California Energy Commission, 2021b).

Buried Radial Duct Design: Bury all ductwork in ceiling insulation by laying the ducts across the ceiling joists or inbetween ceiling joists directly on the ceiling drywall. Duct design is based on a radial design where individual ducts are run to each supply register. This allows for smaller diameter ducts, reducing duct losses and more easily meeting fully or deeply buried conditions. 7 Duct burial and duct system design must be verified by a HERS rater according to the procedures outlined in the 2022 Reference Appendices RA3.1.4.1.5 and RA3.1.4.1.6 (California Energy Commission, 2021b). This applies to the single family prototypes only.

R-8 Duct Insulation: Increase duct insulation to R-8 in the climate zones where R-6 insulation is prescriptive.

Ductless Mini-Split Heat Pump: In the ADU prototype replace the ducted split system with a ductless mini-split heat pump with three indoor heads. The system is evaluated as meeting the criteria for the variable capacity heat pump (VCHP) credit, introduced in the 2019 code cycle, which must be verified by a HERS rater according to the procedures outlined in the 2022 Reference Appendices RA3.4.4.3 (California Energy Commission, 2021b). This credit requires verification of refrigerant charge, that all equipment is entirely within conditioned space, that airflow is directly supplied to all habitable space and that wall mounted thermostats serve any zones greater than 150 square feet.

Compact Hot Water Distribution: Design the hot water distribution system to meet minimum requirements for the basic compact hot water distribution credit according to the procedures outlined in the 2022 Reference Appendices RA4.4.6 (California Energy Commission, 2021b). In many single family homes this may require moving the water heater from an exterior to an interior garage wall. CBECC-Res software assumes a 30% reduction in distribution losses for the basic credit.

Solar PV: Installation of on-site PV is required in the 2022 residential code unless an exception is met. The PV sizing methodology in each package was developed to offset annual building electricity use and avoid oversizing which would 6 Whole house leakage tested at a pressure difference of 50 Pascals between indoors and outdoors. 7 The duct systems in the Central Valley Research Homes Project Final Project Report are illustrative of this approach (Proctor, Wilcox, & Chitwood, 2018).

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Prototypes, Measure Packages, and Costs
12 localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 violate net energy metering (NEM) rules. 8 In all cases, PV is evaluated in CBECC-Res according to the California Flexible Installation (CFI) assumptions.

The Reach Codes Team used two options within the CBECC-Res software for sizing the PV system, described below.

The first option, “Standard Design PV”, was applied in the base case simulations and packages where the PV system size was not changed from the minimum system size required. For the PV packages, the second option was used with a scaling of 100 percent. The Reach Codes Team evaluated an all-electric single family and ADU home with a PV system sized to offset 100 and 90 percent of the total calculated electricity use. Sizing to 100 percent proved to be more cost-effective based on customer utility bills in most cases. As a result, the PV packages were sized to offset 100 percent of electricity use.
• Standard Design PV – the same PV capacity as is required for the Standard Design case9 • Specify PV System Scaling – a PV system sized to offset a specified percentage of the estimated electricity use of the Proposed Design case
One exception to the PV requirement is when the minimum PV system size required is less than 1.8 kWh. This exception applies to the ADU models in Climate Zones 1-9, 12, 14, and 16. For these cases no PV system is required by code and no PV system was modeled in the base case simulations.

Battery Energy Storage: A battery system was evaluated in CBECC-Res with control type set to “Advanced Demand Response Control” and with default efficiencies of 95% for both charging and discharging. The “Advanced Demand Response Control” option assumes the battery system will charge or discharge depending on the needs of the grid. To qualify for the Advanced Demand Response Control the battery system must meet the requirements outlined in the 2022 Reference Appendices JA13.3.3.2 (California Energy Commission, 2021b). 8 NEM rules apply to the IOU territories only.
9 The Standard Design PV system is sized to offset the electricity use of the building loads which are typically electric in a mixed fuel home, which includes all loads except space heating, water heating, clothes drying, and cooking.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Prototypes, Measure Packages, and Costs
13 localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 Table 5: Incremental Cost Assumptions
Measure
Performance
Level
Incremental Cost
(2023 PV$)1
Source & Notes
Single
Family ADU
Non-Preempted Measures
Reduced
Infiltration

3.0 vs 5.0
ACH50 $591 $362 $0.115/ft2 based on NREL’s BEopt cost database plus $250 HERS rater verification.

Window U-factor 0.24 vs 0.30 $2,280 $285 $4.23/ft2 window area based on analysis conducted for the 2019 and 2022 Title 24 cycles (Statewide CASE Team, 2018).

Window SHGC 0.50 vs 0.35 $0 $0 Based on feedback from Statewide CASE Team that higher SHGC does not necessarily have any incremental cost (Statewide CASE Team, 2017).

Cool Roof

0.25 vs 0.20
aged solar
reflectance
$219 $53
$0.07per ft2 of roof area first incremental cost for asphalt shingle product based on the 2022 Nonresidential High Performance Envelope CASE Report (Statewide CASE Team, 2020a).

Total costs assume present value of replacement at year 20 and residual cost for remaining product life at end of 30-year analysis period. Higher reflectance values for lower cost are achievable for tile roof products
Attic Insulation
R-49 vs R-30 $872 n/a
Based on costs from the 2022 Residential Additions & Alterations CASE Report (Statewide CASE Team, 2020b).

R-60 vs R-30 $1,420 n/a
R-60 vs R-38 $1,096 n/a
Slab Edge
Insulation R-10 vs R-0 $651 $449 $4 per linear foot of slab perimeter based on internet research. Assumes 16in depth.

Low Pressure
Drop Ducts

0.35 vs 0.45
W/cfm $99 $49
Costs assume one-hour labor for single family and half-hour for the ADU. Labor rate of $88 per hour is from 2022 RS Means for sheet metal workers and includes a weighted average City Cost Index for labor for California.

Buried Ducts Buried, radial
design $281 n/a
No cost for laying ducts on attic floor versus suspending, in some cases there will be cost savings. Neutral cost for radiant design versus trunk and branch design. A $250 HERS Rater verification fee is included.

Duct Insulation R-8 vs R-6 $201 n/a Based on costs from the 2022 Residential Additions & Alterations CASE Report (Statewide CASE Team, 2020b).

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Prototypes, Measure Packages, and Costs
14 localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 Measure
Performance
Level
Incremental Cost
(2023 PV$)1
Source & Notes
Single
Family ADU
Ductless MiniSplit Heat Pump
Ductless system
meeting the
VCHP credit vs.
ducted split heat
pump
n/a $1,571
Costs were developed based on data from E3’s 2019 report Residential Building Electrification in California (Energy & Environmental Economics, 2019) and the 2022 AllElectric Multifamily CASE Report (Statewide CASE Team, 2020c). Equipment costs are from the CASE Report for the 10-story multifamily prototype assuming similar sized equipment between the multifamily dwelling unit and the ADU. Thermostat, wiring, electrical, and ducting costs are from the E3 study. A $250 HERS Rater verification fee is also included.

Where this measure is applied to the mixed fuel home with a gas furnace, this cost is in addition to the cost difference for a heat pump versus a gas furnace/split AC reported in Section 3.3.2.

Compact Hot
Water
Distribution
Basic credit –
homes with gas
tankless
$196 $0
For single family homes with a gas tankless water heater (mixed fuel homes in Climate Zones 3,4,13,14) assumes adding 20-feet venting at $14.69 per linear foot to locate water heater on interior garage wall, less 20-feet savings for PEX and pipe insulation at $5.98 per linear foot. Costs from online retailers. For single family homes with a HPWH there is an incremental cost savings from less pipe being required. For the ADU it is assumed the credit can be met without any changes to design and there is no cost impact.

Basic credit –
homes with
HPWH
$-134 $0
PV + Battery
PV System
First Cost $3.21/W $3.21/W
First costs from LBNL’s Tracking the Sun 2021 costs (Barbose, Darghouth, O'Shaughnessy, & Forrester, 2021) and represent median costs in California in 2020 of $3.90/WDC for residential systems. The first cost was reduced by the solar energy Investment Tax Credit of 30%.2 Costs are presented as the average of 2023, 2024, and 2025.

Inverter replacement cost of $0.14/WDC present value includes replacements at year 11 at $0.15/WDC (nominal) and at year 21 at $0.12/WDC (nominal) per the 2019 PV CASE Report (California Energy Commission, 2017).

System maintenance costs of $0.31/WDC present value assume $0.02/WDC (nominal) annually per the 2019 PV CASE Report (California Energy Commission, 2017).

Inverter
replacement $0.14/W $0.14/W
Maintenance $0.31/W $0.31/W

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Prototypes, Measure Packages, and Costs
15 localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 Measure
Performance
Level
Incremental Cost
(2023 PV$)1
Source & Notes
Single
Family ADU
Battery
First cost $617/kWh $617/kWh
Costs are based on research conducted for the 2021 Batteries in Single Family Homes reach code report (Statewide Reach Codes Team, 2021a). $1,000/kWh first cost in 2020 based on Self-Generation Incentive Program (SGIP) residential participant cost data. To estimate the first cost in future years this was reduced by 7% annually based on SDG&E’s Behind-theMeter Battery Market Study (E-Source companies, 2020). The first cost is reduced by the solar energy Investment Tax Credit of 30%.2 Costs are presented as the average of 2023, 2024, and 2025. No SGIP incentives are included.

Replacement cost at year 10 and 20 was calculated based on the 2023 cost reduced by 7% annually over the next 10 years for a future value cost of $389 (present value of $290 in year 10 and $216 in year 20).

Replacement
cost $505/kWh $505/kWh
1 All first costs are assumed to be financed in a mortgage and interest costs due to financing are included in the incremental costs. See Section 2.1.2 for details.

Interest costs were not included for calculating TDV cost-effectiveness. 2As part of the Inflation Reduction Act in August 2022 the Section 25D Investment Tax Credit was extended and raised to 30% through 2032 with a step-down beginning in 2033. https://www.seia.org/sites/default/files/2022-08/Inflation%20Reduction%20Act%20Summary%20PDF%20FINAL.pdf

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Prototypes, Measure Packages, and Costs
16 localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12

3.3.2 All-Electric
This analysis compared a code compliant mixed fuel prototype, which uses natural gas for three appliances (cooking, clothes drying and either space heating or water heating), with a code compliant all-electric prototype. In these cases, the relative costs between natural gas and electric appliances, differences between in-house electricity and natural gas infrastructure and the associated infrastructure costs for providing natural gas to the building were included.

To estimate costs the Reach Codes Team leveraged costs from the 2019 reach code cost-effectiveness studies for residential new construction (Statewide Reach Codes Team, 2019) and detached accessory dwelling units (Statewide Reach Codes Team, 2021b), 2022 RS Means, PG&E data, published utility schedules and rules, and online research.

Incremental costs for natural gas infrastructure to a single family building are presented in Table 6 through Table 11.

These costs are applied as cost savings for an all-electric home when compared to a mixed fuel home. This is the component with the highest degree of variability for all-electric homes. These costs are project dependent and may be significantly impacted by such factors as utility territory, site characteristics, distance to the nearest natural gas main and main location, joint trenching, whether work is conducted by the utility or a private contractor, and number of dwelling units per development. All gas utilities participating in this study were solicited for cost information. The CA IOU costs for single family homes presented are based primarily on cost data provided by PG&E.

Table 6 presents assumed gas main distribution line extension costs within gas CA IOU territory. Total distribution line extension costs are based on cost data provided by PG&E for new greenfield development. Total costs are reduced to account for deductions per the Utility Gas Main Extensions rules. 10 These rules categorize distribution line extensions as “refundable” costs, which are offset or subsidized by all other ratepayers. Refundable costs are first subsidized by appliance allowances, which are defined in Table 7. If there are additional costs in excess of the allowances, the developer has the option to either be refunded for the remaining amount over ten years or receive a 50 percent discount at time of application. The latter discount option is assumed in this analysis and is more commonly used by developers (California Public Utilities Commission, 2022). Two scenarios are presented in Table 6 since the appliance allowances differ by type of appliance. One is for the base case home with a prescriptive heat pump space heater which assumes a gas water heater, gas cooking, and gas clothes dryer (Climate Zones 3, 4, 13, and 14). The second is for the base case home with a prescriptive heat pump water heater which assumes a gas furnace, gas cooking, and gas clothes dryer. and a natural gas furnace for space heating (Climate Zones 1, 2, 5 through 12, 15, and 16).

The costs less the deductions were applied under the On-Bill cost-effectiveness methodology. The total costs before the deductions were applied under the TDV cost-effectiveness methodology to better reflect the full cost of gas main extensions since the deductions are subsidized by ratepayers and recovered via revenue from customers. This follows the analysis approach in the 2019 reach code study (Statewide Reach Codes Team, 2019) and was based on input received from the Energy Commission and agreement from the Reach Codes technical advisory team that the approach is appropriate. TDV cost savings impacts extend beyond the customer and account for societal impacts of energy use. Accounting for the full cost of the infrastructure upgrades was determined to be justified when evaluating under the TDV methodology.

The CPUC issued a Proposed Decision in August 2022 that recommends eliminating the subsidies effective July 1, 2023. At the time of publishing this report there had been no ruling on this decision and therefore this analysis assumes the existing rules will remain in place through the 2022 code cycle. A sensitivity analysis of how the results would change if the Proposed Decision were adopted is included in the results of this report. 10 PG&E Rule 15: https://www.pge.com/tariffs/assets/pdf/tariffbook/GAS_RULES_15.pdf.

SoCalGas Rule 20: https://www.socalgas.com/regulatory/tariffs/tm2/pdf/20.pdf.

SDG&E Rule 15: https://tariff.sdge.com/tm2/pdf/GAS_GAS-RULES_GRULE15.pdf.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Prototypes, Measure Packages, and Costs
17 localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 Table 6. Single Family IOU Natural Gas Main Distribution Line Extension Costs Total
Less Gas Extension Rule
Deductions1
PG&E SoCalGas SDG&E
Gas Water Heater Base $1,020 $0 $13 $0
Gas Space Heater Base $0 $0 $0
1After Utility Gas Main Extension Rule deductions.

Table 7. Residential IOU Gas Line Extension Appliance Allowances Appliance PG&E SoCalGas SDG&E
Water Heating $1,391 $682 $1,138
Space Heating $987 $818 $987
Oven/Range $84 $152 $201
Dryer Stub $24 $160 $289
Total - Gas Water Heater Base $1,499 $994 $1,628
Total – Gas Space Heater Base $1,095 $1,130 $1,477
Table 8 presents costs for the extension of service lines from a main distribution line to the home within gas CA IOU territory. These costs are based on data provided by PG&E excluding trenching. Costs are presented separately for a new subdivision in an undeveloped area as well as an infill development. The service extension is typically more costly in an infill scenario due to the disruption of existing roads, sidewalks, and other structures. For this analysis an average of the new subdivision and infill development costs was used, representing 80 percent of the new subdivision and 20 percent infill.

Table 8. Single Family IOU Natural Gas Service Line Extension Costs New
Subdivision
Infill
Development
Average
(80% New, 20% Infill)
$1,300 $6,750 $2,390
Table 9 presents other relative costs within gas CA IOU territory including gas meter installation and IOU plan review.

These costs are based on data provided by PG&E.

Table 9. Single Family IOU Other Natural Gas Infrastructure Costs Meter $300
Plan Review $850
Table 10 presents total costs including distribution and service line extensions, meter installation and plan review for the three gas CA IOUs for the two base case scenarios. Costs are based on the average service line extension costs from Table 8. For the single family analysis, based on the Reach Codes Team's conversations with the industry it is assumed that no upgrades to the electrical panel are required and that a 200 Amp panel is typically installed for both mixed fuel and all-electric homes.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Prototypes, Measure Packages, and Costs
18 localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 Table 10. Single Family IOU Total Natural Gas Infrastructure Costs1 Total Less Gas Extension Rule
Deductions2
PG&E SoCalGas SDG&E
Total - Gas Water Heater Base $4,560 $3,540 $3,553 $3,540 Total - Gas Space Heater Base $3,540 $3,540 $3,540
1Based on average service line extension costs from Table 8. 1After Utility Gas Main Extension Rule deductions.

CPAU provides gas service to its customers and therefore separate costs were evaluated based on CPAU gas service connection fees. 11 Table 11 presents the breakdown of gas infrastructure costs used in this analysis for CPAU. There is no main distribution line component since Palo Alto has little greenfield space remaining and most of the development is infill.

Table 11. Single Family CPAU Total Natural Gas Infrastructure Costs Item Cost
Service Extension $5,892
Meter $1,012
Plan Review Costs $924
Total $7,828
Table 12 presents incremental costs for natural gas infrastructure for the detached ADU. These costs are directly from the 2019 detached ADU reach code report (Statewide Reach Codes Team, 2021b) and were obtained from interviews and RS Means. For the ADU scenario it’s assumed that natural gas already exists on the lot and is being extended to the location of the ADU typically at the back of the lot. There are incremental cost savings for an all-electric ADU from not extending the natural gas service; however, there is also a small incremental cost for upgrading the electric service to accommodate the additional electrical load. The Reach Codes Team found that a new detached ADU would require that the building owner upgrade the service connection to the lot in both the mixed-fuel ADU design and the all-electric design. The most common size for this upgrade is to upsize the existing panel to 225A, which would not represent an incremental cost from the mixed-fuel project to the all-electric project. Feeder wiring to the ADU and the ADU subpanel will need to be slightly upgraded for the all-electric design. 11 CPAU Schedule G-5 effective 09-01-2019: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/utilities/utilitiesengineering/general-specifications/gas-service-connection-fees.pdf

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Prototypes, Measure Packages, and Costs
19 localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 Table 12. ADU Utility Infrastructure Costs
Mixed Fuel Measure Mixed Fuel
Cost All-Electric Measure All-Electric Cost
All-Electric
Incremental Cost
Site natural gas service
extension $1,998 No site natural gas service $0 ($1,998) Site electrical service
connection upgrade 225A $3,500
Site electrical service
connection upgrade 225A $3,500 $0
100A feeder to ADU with
breaker $933
125A feeder to ADU with
breaker $1,206 $273
100A ADU subpanel $733 125A ADU subpanel $946 $213
Totals $7,164 $5,652 ($1,512)
Equipment lifetimes applied in this analysis for the water heating and space conditioning measures are summarized in Table 13. The lifetime for the heat pump, furnace, and air conditioner are based on the Database for Energy Efficient Resources (DEER) (California Public Utilities Commission, 2021b). In DEER, heat pump and air conditioner measures are assigned an effective useful lifetime (EUL) of 15 years and a furnace an EUL of 20 years. The heating and cooling system components are typically replaced at the same time when one reaches the end of its life and the other is near it. Therefore, it is assumed that both the furnace and air conditioner are replaced at the same time at year 17.5, halfway between 15 and 20 years. For HVAC system costing, air-conditioning is included in all cases in both the base case and proposed models. Present value replacement costs are included in the total lifetime incremental costs.

Table 13: Lifetime of Water Heating & Space Conditioning Equipment Measures Measure Lifetime
Gas Furnace 17.5
Air Conditioner 17.5
Heat Pump 15
Gas Tankless Water Heater 20
Heat Pump Water Heater 15
Appliance incremental costs are shown in Table 14 and Table 15. Replacement costs are applied to HVAC and DHW equipment over the 30-year evaluation period. Costs were estimated to reflect costs to the building owner. All costs are provided as present value in 2023 (2023 PV$). Costs due to variations in furnace, air conditioner, and heat pump capacity by climate zone were not accounted for.

The Reach Codes Team determined that the typical first installed cost for electric appliances is similar to that for natural gas appliances. Cost differences include equipment cost and installation, costs for natural gas piping from the meter to the appliance, and costs for electrical wiring to service the appliances.

Space Heater: Typical HVAC incremental costs were based on material costs from the AC Wholesalers website and labor costs from 2022 RS Means. In most cases the Reach Codes Team found that the material costs were slightly higher for the heat pump, but the labor costs were slightly higher for the gas furnace/AC installation. Costs were calculated for capacities ranging from a 2-ton to a 5-ton and the incremental costs used in this study were based on a weighted average of the expected nominal capacities from CBECC-Res autosizing results for the 2,100 square foot prototype. Incremental replacement costs for the heat pump are based on a 17.5-year lifetime for the gas furnace and air conditioner and a 15-year lifetime for the heat pump. Residual value of the gas furnace/AC at the end of the 30-year analysis period was accounted for to represent the remaining life of the equipment. Page 91 of 364 Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Prototypes, Measure Packages, and Costs
20 localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 Water Heater: Various cost sources were reviewed and the Reach Codes Team determined that installed first costs for a garage installed tankless gas water heater and HPWH are very similar and no incremental cost was applied for the equipment and installation (see below for details on costs for gas piping and electrical wiring). This accounts for slightly higher equipment costs for the HPWH but lower installation labor due to the elimination of the combustion gas venting.

Incremental replacement costs account for a 15-year HPWH lifetime and a 20-year lifetime for the gas tankless water heater. Residual value of the gas tankless at the end of the 30-year analysis period was accounted for to represent the remaining life of the equipment. For the ADU analysis the water heater is evaluated within the conditioned space with the supply air ducted from the outside. An HVAC contractor provided a cost estimate for supply air ducting through the wall in an ADU where the water heater is in an interior room adjacent to an exterior wall. The estimated total cost for this was $652.

A high efficiency HPWH that meets the Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance (NEEA) 12 Tier 3 rating was also evaluated. HPWHs certified to meet NEEA Tier 3 or Tier 4 are the dominant product on the market today. According to NEEA all major HPWH manufacturers are represented in NEEA’s qualified product list 13 and there are only 11 listed products certified as Tier 1 or Tier 2. 14 While the Reach Codes Team evaluated a HPWH that just meets the federal minimum efficiency standards of close to 2.0 UEF to satisfy federal preemption requirements, the Reach Codes Team is not aware of any 2.0 UEF products that are available. The Reach Codes Team was unable to find any of the Tier 1 or Tier2 HPWHs for sale online and was unable to find any products for sale online that were not NEEA Tier 3 or Tier 4 certified. As a result, no incremental cost is assumed for a NEEA Tier 3 product versus a federal minimum efficiency product.

Clothes Dryer and Range: After review of various sources, the Reach Codes Team concluded that the cost difference between gas and electric resistance equipment for clothes dryers and stoves is negligible and that the lifetimes of the two technologies are also similar.

Electric Service Upgrade: The 2022 Title 24 Code requires electric readiness for gas appliances; as a result, the incremental costs to provide electrical service for electric appliances are minimal. The incremental costs accounted for in this study are calculated as the cost to install 220V service for the electric appliances less the cost for the electric ready requirements and for installing 110V service for the comparable gas appliance. Incremental costs are applied for the space heater, water heater, and cooking range. Based on builder surveys, it’s assumed that in a typical mixed fuel home both electric and gas service are provided to the dryer location and therefore no incremental costs for the dryer were applied. Costs assume 50A service for the range and 30A service for the space heater and water heater. Costs are assumed to be the same for the single family and ADU analyses.

In-House Natural Gas Infrastructure (from meter to appliances): Installation cost to run a natural gas line from the meter to the appliance location was estimated at $580 per appliance. These costs were based on material costs from Home Depot and labor costs from 2022 RS Means. The material costs were about 1/3 higher in RS Means than Home Depot, so the Reach Codes Team used the lower costs from Home Depot. The Reach Codes Team conducted a pipe sizing analysis for the two single family and one ADU prototype homes to estimate the length and diameter of gas piping required assuming the home included a gas furnace, gas tankless water heater, gas range, and gas dryer. Total estimated costs were very similar for each of the three prototypes and an average cost per appliance of $580 was determined. Costs are assumed to be the same for the single family and ADU analyses. 12 Based on operational challenges experienced in the past, NEEA established rating test criteria to ensure newly installed HPWHs perform adequately, especially in colder climates. The NEEA rating requires products comply with ENERGY STAR and includes requirements regarding noise and prioritizing heat pump use over supplemental electric resistance heating.
13 https://neea.org/success-stories/heat-pump-water-heaters 14 https://neea.org/img/documents/residential-unitary-HPWH-qualified-products-list.pdf

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Prototypes, Measure Packages, and Costs
21 localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 Table 14. Single Family All-Electric Appliance Incremental Costs Measure
Incremental Cost (2023 PV$)
First Cost Replacement
Cost
Total Lifetime
Financed
Heat Pump vs Gas Furnace/Split AC
Equipment & Installation ($151) $703 $533
Electric Service Upgrade $43 $0 $49
In-House Gas Piping ($580) $0 ($651)
Total ($688) $703 ($69)
Heat Pump Water Heater vs Gas Tankless
Equipment & Installation $0 $652 $652
Electric Service Upgrade $43 $0 $49
In-House Gas Piping ($580) $0 ($651)
Total ($537) $652 $49
NEEA Tier 3 HPWH vs Federal Minimum HPWH
Equipment $0 $0 $0
Total $0 $0 $0
Electric Resistance vs Gas Cooking
Equipment & Installation $0 $0 $0
Electric Service Upgrade $100 $0 $113
In-House Gas Piping ($580) $0 ($651)
Total ($480) $0 ($539)
Electric Resistance vs Gas Clothes Drying
Equipment & Installation $0 $0 $0
Electric Service Upgrade $0 $0 $0
In-House Gas Piping ($580) $0 ($651)
Total ($580) $0 ($651)

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Prototypes, Measure Packages, and Costs
22 localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 Table 15. ADU All-Electric Appliance Incremental Costs
Measure
Incremental Cost (2023 PV$)
First Cost Replacement
Cost
Total Lifetime
Financed
Heat Pump vs Gas Furnace/Split AC
Equipment & Installation ($151) $703 $533
Electric Service Upgrade $43 $0 $49
In-House Gas Piping ($580) $0 ($651)
Total ($688) $703 ($69)
Heat Pump Water Heater vs Gas Tankless
Equipment & Installation $652 $652 $1,384
Electric Service Upgrade $43 $0 $49
In-House Gas Piping ($580) $0 ($651)
Total $115 $652 $781
NEEA Tier 3 HPWH vs Federal Minimum HPWH
Equipment $0 $0 $0
Total $0 $0 $0
Electric Resistance vs Gas Cooking
Equipment & Installation $0 $0 $0
Electric Service Upgrade $100 $0 $113
In-House Gas Piping ($580) $0 ($651)
Total ($480) $0 ($539)
Electric Resistance vs Gas Clothes Drying
Equipment & Installation $0 $0 $0
Electric Service Upgrade $0 $0 $0
In-House Gas Piping ($580) $0 ($651)
Total ($580) $0 ($651)

3.4 Measure Packages
The Reach Codes Team evaluated three packages for mixed fuel homes and five packages for all-electric homes for each prototype and climate zone, as described below.

1. All-Electric Code Minimum: This package meets all the prescriptive requirements of the 2022 Title 24 Code. In some instances, the prescriptive minimum package did not comply with code and efficiency measures were added to meet minimum compliance requirements. The added efficiency measures can be found in Table 45 and Table 46.

2. Efficiency Only: This package uses only efficiency measures that don’t trigger federal preemption issues including envelope and water heating or duct distribution efficiency measures.

3. Efficiency + NEEA (Preempted): This package was evaluated for the all-electric homes only and shows an alternative design that applies water heating equipment that is more efficient than federal standards meeting the NEEA Tier 3 rating. The Reach Codes Team considers this more reflective of how builders meet above code requirements in practice.

4. Efficiency + PV: Using the Efficiency Package as a starting point, PV capacity was added to offset most of the estimated electricity use. Page 94 of 364
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Prototypes, Measure Packages, and Costs
23 localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12

5. Efficiency + PV + Battery: Using the Efficiency & PV Package as a starting point, a battery system was added.

For mixed-fuel homes the package of efficiency measures differed from the Efficiency Package in some climate zones to arrive at a cost effective solution.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Results
24 localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 4 Results

4.1 2022 Metrics and Compliance
The Reach Codes Team evaluated the compliance impacts of a prescriptive all-electric home as well as a traditional mixed fuel home with four gas appliances (space heating, water heating, cooking, clothes drying). Compliance is relative to the 2022 prescriptive base case home with three gas appliances. The impacts for the single family home and the ADU are presented in Figure 1 and Figure 2, respectively. The all-electric single family home prototype is code compliant with both EDR1 (source energy) and efficiency EDR2 (TDV energy) in all climate zones except Climate Zones 15 and 16. In addition to this climate zone, the all-electric ADU is also not compliant in Climate Zones 4 through 10 and 13 through 15. The four gas appliance single family home is presented in Figure 3. This case is not code compliant in any climate zone.

This analysis illustrates a couple of interesting points. One is that the new 2022 compliance metrics are important drivers encouraging electrification. The compliance penalties assessed the four gas appliance home scenarios are significant and will require deep efficiency measures to overcome. Another is that the 2022 Title 24 Code’s new source energy metric combined with the heat pump baseline encourage all-electric construction, providing a compliance benefit, at least in larger homes, that allows for some amount of prescriptively required building efficiency to be traded off and still comply when using the performance method.

Figure 1: Single Family All-Electric Home Compliance Impacts -5
0 5
10 15
20 25
CZ01 CZ02 CZ03 CZ04 CZ05 CZ06 CZ07 CZ08 CZ09 CZ10 CZ11 CZ12 CZ13 CZ14 CZ15 CZ16 EDR Margin
All-Electric Prescrip�ve
Source (EDR1) TDV (EDR2 Efficiency)

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Results
25 localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 Figure 2: ADU All-Electric Home Compliance Impacts
Figure 3: Single Family Four Gas Appliance Home Compliance Impacts -6
-4
-2
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 CZ01 CZ02 CZ03 CZ04 CZ05 CZ06 CZ07 CZ08 CZ09 CZ10 CZ11 CZ12 CZ13 CZ14 CZ15 CZ16 EDR Margin
All-Electric Prescrip�ve
Source (EDR1) TDV (EDR2 Efficiency)
-18
-16
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0 2
CZ01 CZ02 CZ03 CZ04 CZ05 CZ06 CZ07 CZ08 CZ09 CZ10 CZ11 CZ12 CZ13 CZ14 CZ15 CZ16 EDR Margin
Mixed Fuel Prescrip�ve, 4 Gas Appliances
Source (EDR1) TDV (EDR2 Efficiency)

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 26 Results
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12

4.2 All-Electric Code Minimum Results
Table 16 shows results for the single family all-electric code minimum case compared to the 2022 baseline. This package reflects the prescriptive minimum requirements except in Climate Zones 15 and 16, where efficiency measures were added to meet minimum code compliance. Utility cost savings are negative, indicating an increase in utility costs for the all-electric building, in all cases except in CPAU and SMUD territories. In all cases the incremental cost is negative, which reflects a cost savings for the all-electric building due to eliminating the gas infrastructure costs. The package is cost effective based on TDV in all cases; however, it’s only cost-effective On-Bill in Climate Zones 4 in CPAU territory, 6, 8, 9, 12 in SMUD territory, and 15.

Table 17 shows the all-electric code minimum case results for the ADU. This package reflects the prescriptive minimum requirements except in Climate Zones 4 through 10 and 13 through 16, where efficiency measures were added to meet minimum code compliance. The conclusions related to cost-effectiveness are similar for the ADU as for the single family analysis.

A summary of measures included in each package is provided in Appendix 7.3 Summary of Measures by Package. The efficiency measures added to the allelectric package to meet minimum code requirements are described in Table 45 and Table 46.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 27 Results
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 Table 16. Single Family Cost-Effectiveness: All-Electric Code Minimum Climate
Zone
Electric
/Gas Utility
Efficiency
EDR2
Margin
Annual
Elec
Savings
(kWh)
Annual
Gas
Savings
(therms)
Average
Annual GHG
Reductions
(metric tons)
Utility Cost Savings Incremental Cost On-Bill TDV
First
Year
Lifecycle
(2022$)
First
Year
Lifecycle
(2022$)
B/C
Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV
CZ01 PGE 8.3 -4,628 400 1.5 ($721) ($10,848) ($5,288) ($5,234) 0.5 ($5,614) >1 $5,566 CZ02 PGE 5.7 -3,170 247 0.8 ($581) ($10,060) ($5,288) ($5,234) 0.5 ($4,826) >1 $5,390 CZ03 PGE 4.7 -2,413 171 0.7 ($510) ($9,954) ($5,136) ($5,116) 0.5 ($4,838) 63.5 $4,414 CZ04 PGE 3.7 -2,233 163 0.7 ($455) ($8,756) ($5,136) ($5,116) 0.6 ($3,641) >1 $4,929 CZ04 CPAU 3.7 -2,233 163 0.7 $21 $3,274 ($9,424) ($9,931) >1 $13,205 >1 $9,217 CZ05 PGE 1.1 -2,123 133 0.4 ($452) ($8,930) ($5,288) ($5,234) 0.6 ($3,696) 2.5 $2,776 CZ05 PGE/SCG 1.1 -2,123 133 0.4 ($455) ($9,027) ($5,288) ($5,234) 0.6 ($3,793) 2.5 $2,776 CZ06 SCE/SCG 2.5 -1,481 84 0.3 ($269) ($5,120) ($5,288) ($5,234) 1.0 $115 3.2 $3,142 CZ07 SDGE 2.3 -1,328 69 0.2 ($456) ($10,904) ($5,288) ($5,234) 0.5 ($5,670) 3.1 $3,081 CZ08 SCE/SCG 0.6 -1,331 67 0.2 ($249) ($4,864) ($5,288) ($5,234) 1.1 $371 2.8 $2,951 CZ09 SCE 1.2 -1,513 85 0.3 ($269) ($5,109) ($5,288) ($5,234) 1.0 $126 3.3 $3,179 CZ10 SCE/SCG 1.1 -1,777 107 0.3 ($307) ($5,720) ($5,288) ($5,234) 0.9 ($486) 3.5 $3,285 CZ10 SDGE 1.1 -1,777 107 0.3 ($657) ($15,474) ($5,288) ($5,234) 0.3 ($10,239) 3.5 $3,285 CZ11 PGE 3.5 -2,934 227 0.7 ($444) ($7,106) ($5,288) ($5,234) 0.7 ($1,872) >1 $5,135 CZ12 PGE 4.0 -2,751 213 0.7 ($437) ($7,213) ($5,288) ($5,234) 0.7 ($1,979) >1 $5,002 CZ12 SMUD/PGE 4.0 -2,751 213 0.7 $58 $4,526 ($5,288) ($5,234) >1 $9,761 >1 $5,002 CZ13 PGE 2.1 -2,099 154 0.6 ($383) ($7,136) ($5,136) ($5,116) 0.7 ($2,021) >1 $4,904 CZ14 SCE/SCG 1.6 -2,301 159 0.6 ($411) ($7,590) ($5,136) ($5,116) 0.7 ($2,475) >1 $4,493 CZ14 SDGE 1.6 -2,301 159 0.6 ($914) ($21,350) ($5,149) ($5,130) 0.2 ($16,219) >1 $4,506 CZ15 SCE/SCG 1.6 -944 53 0.2 ($165) ($3,084) ($5,407) ($5,369) 1.7 $2,285 10.3 $4,247 CZ16 PG&E 6.0 -4,314 404 1.5 ($545) ($6,642) ($3,257) ($2,954) 0.4 ($3,687) >1 $3,139

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 28 Results
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 Table 17. ADU Cost-Effectiveness: All-Electric Code Minimum Climate
Zone
Electric
/Gas Utility
Efficiency
EDR2
Margin
Annual
Elec
Savings
(kWh)
Annual
Gas
Savings
(therms)
Average
Annual GHG
Reductions
(metric tons)
Utility Cost
Savings Incremental Cost On-Bill TDV
First
Year
Lifecycle
(2022$)
First
Year
Lifecycle
(2022$)
B/C
Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV
CZ01 PGE 0.0 -1,832 114 0.4 ($346) ($6,791) ($3,260) ($2,957) 0.4 ($3,834) 1.2 $489 CZ02 PGE 0.4 -1,380 75 0.2 ($353) ($7,539) ($3,260) ($2,957) 0.4 ($4,582) 1.2 $403 CZ03 PGE 0.0 -1,665 123 0.5 ($384) ($7,667) ($2,457) ($2,106) 0.3 ($5,560) 2.0 $888 CZ04 PGE 0.2 -1,591 118 0.5 ($351) ($6,970) ($3,260) ($2,957) 0.4 ($4,013) 15.9 $2,395 CZ04 CPAU 0.2 -1,591 118 0.5 $42 $3,285 ($3,260) ($2,957) >1 $6,242 15.9 $2,395 CZ05 PGE 0.4 -1,031 49 0.1 ($268) ($5,966) ($3,260) ($2,957) 0.5 ($3,009) 1.2 $460 CZ05 PGE/SCG 0.4 -1,031 49 0.1 ($226) ($4,656) ($3,260) ($2,957) 0.6 ($1,699) 1.2 $460 CZ06 SCE/SCG 0.2 -909 38 0.1 ($215) ($4,435) ($3,260) ($2,957) 0.7 ($1,478) 1.4 $666 CZ07 SDGE 0.4 -879 37 0.1 ($384) ($9,528) ($3,260) ($2,957) 0.3 ($6,571) 1.4 $771 CZ08 SCE/SCG 0.6 -864 36 0.1 ($212) ($4,397) ($3,216) ($2,908) 0.7 ($1,489) 1.5 $876 CZ09 SCE 0.6 -901 38 0.1 ($190) ($3,861) ($3,216) ($2,908) 0.8 ($953) 1.6 $896 CZ10 SCE/SCG 0.4 -962 43 0.1 ($184) ($3,663) ($3,216) ($2,908) 0.8 ($755) 1.7 $1,055 CZ10 SDGE 0.4 -962 43 0.1 ($404) ($9,951) ($3,216) ($2,908) 0.3 ($7,043) 1.7 $1,055 CZ11 PGE 0.2 -1,322 71 0.2 ($297) ($6,281) ($3,260) ($2,957) 0.5 ($3,324) 1.5 $843 CZ12 PGE 0.3 -1,283 69 0.2 ($298) ($6,354) ($3,260) ($2,957) 0.5 ($3,397) 1.4 $716 CZ12 SMUD/PGE 0.3 -1,283 69 0.2 ($75) ($1,053) ($3,260) ($2,957) 2.8 $1,904 1.4 $716 CZ13 PGE 0.1 -1,594 112 0.4 ($296) ($5,748) ($3,260) ($2,957) 0.5 ($2,791) 11.3 $2,330 CZ14 SCE/SCG 0.4 -1,658 115 0.4 ($282) ($5,107) ($3,216) ($2,908) 0.6 ($2,199) 12.6 $2,313 CZ14 SDGE 0.4 -1,658 115 0.4 ($455) ($10,294) ($3,216) ($2,908) 0.3 ($7,386) 12.6 $2,313 CZ15 SCE/SCG 1.3 -783 36 0.1 ($146) ($2,872) ($3,216) ($2,908) 1.0 $35 2.3 $1,408 CZ16 PG&E 0.1 -1,807 122 0.4 ($348) ($6,698) ($2,640) ($2,261) 0.3 ($4,437) 1.0 $22

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 29 Results
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12

4.3 All-Electric Plus Efficiency, PV, and Battery Results Table 18 and Table 19 compare cost-effectiveness results for the all-electric packages for the single family and ADU prototypes, respectively. In all cases the packages are cost effective based on TDV. On-Bill cost effectiveness generally improves with the addition of efficiency measures, improves significantly with an upsized PV system, and then declines again once batteries are added.

Table 18. Single Family Cost-Effectiveness: All-Electric Energy Efficiency + Additional PV + Battery Climate
Zone
Electric
/Gas Utility
All Electric Efficiency All Electric Efficiency + NEEA All Electric Efficiency + PV All Electric Efficiency + PV + Battery
On-Bill TDV On-Bill TDV On-Bill TDV On-Bill TDV
B/C
Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV CZ01 PGE 0.7 ($1,256) >1 $8,122 4.0 $2,407 >1 $10,497 2.8 $22,471 1.9 $9,517 1.5 $11,220 1.4 $9,062 CZ02 PGE 0.6 ($1,957) >1 $7,579 1.1 $236 >1 $8,957 3.5 $16,261 2.9 $10,678 1.3 $4,955 1.9 $13,716 CZ03 PGE 0.5 ($3,826) >1 $4,674 0.6 ($1,851) >1 $6,023 3.5 $10,584 2.9 $7,145 0.96 ($685) 1.6 $9,058 CZ04 PGE 0.5 ($3,085) >1 $5,328 0.7 ($1,599) >1 $6,220 3.7 $9,560 3.7 $8,348 0.9 ($1,607) 1.8 $10,519 CZ04 CPAU >1 $12,524 >1 $9,616 >1 $13,328 >1 $10,508 >1 $13,692 >1 $12,636 1.4 $3,815 2.6 $14,807 CZ05 PGE 0.6 ($2,601) 12.6 $3,140 1.1 $363 >1 $5,239 4.9 $11,566 3.3 $6,058 1.0 $583 1.6 $7,976 CZ05 PGE/SCG 0.6 ($2,698) 12.6 $3,140 1.1 $266 >1 $5,239 4.8 $11,469 3.3 $6,058 1.0 $486 1.6 $7,976 CZ06 SCE/SCG 0.9 ($500) 21.3 $2,785 1.2 $554 >1 $3,582 5.3 $6,705 4.9 $5,331 0.96 ($530) 1.6 $7,663 CZ07 SDGE 0.4 ($5,221) 6.1 $2,929 0.5 ($3,795) >1 $3,706 13.2 $11,129 7.2 $4,840 0.97 ($355) 1.5 $6,158 CZ08 SCE/SCG 1.0 $129 8.8 $3,006 1.4 $1,028 >1 $3,618 10.2 $6,404 10.7 $5,797 0.99 ($82) 1.8 $8,401 CZ09 SCE 0.996 ($14) 102.1 $3,357 1.3 $959 >1 $4,073 8.5 $7,052 8.7 $6,238 1.1 $626 1.9 $10,710 CZ10 SCE/SCG 0.9 ($403) >1 $3,475 1.2 $668 >1 $4,260 5.5 $7,389 5.5 $6,432 1.1 $1,597 1.7 $7,804 CZ10 SDGE 0.3 ($9,171) >1 $3,475 0.3 ($7,637) >1 $4,260 8.4 $12,063 5.5 $6,432 1.0 $514 1.7 $7,804 CZ11 PGE 1.1 $356 >1 $6,751 2.9 $1,988 >1 $7,863 3.9 $15,570 3.1 $9,509 1.3 $4,736 1.8 $12,035 CZ12 PGE 0.8 ($923) >1 $5,727 1.4 $840 >1 $6,925 3.8 $14,386 2.9 $8,684 1.2 $3,221 1.8 $11,629 CZ12 SMUD/PGE >1 $8,792 >1 $5,727 >1 $9,445 >1 $6,925 3.2 $11,636 2.9 $8,684 1.1 $1,351 1.8 $11,629 CZ13 PGE 1.0 ($134) >1 $6,391 1.7 $1,204 >1 $7,315 4.5 $12,333 3.9 $8,944 1.1 $1,808 1.9 $12,609 CZ14 SCE/SCG 0.96 ($226) >1 $6,168 2.6 $1,429 >1 $7,337 3.5 $11,205 3.8 $10,769 1.4 $6,530 1.9 $13,315 CZ14 SDGE 0.2 ($12,027) >1 $6,181 0.2 ($8,562) >1 $7,350 4.2 $14,424 3.8 $10,782 1.2 $2,882 1.9 $13,328 CZ15 SCE/SCG 3.2 $2,088 >1 $4,185 10.7 $2,739 >1 $4,639 >1 $5,871 >1 $5,572 1.2 $2,471 1.7 $7,367 CZ16 PG&E 0.3 ($2,843) >1 $3,675 0.5 ($1,291) >1 $4,277 3.1 $22,017 1.9 $8,576 1.5 $10,722 1.6 $11,922

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 30 Results
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 Table 19. ADU Cost-Effectiveness: All-Electric Energy Efficiency + Additional PV + Battery Climate
Zone
Electric
/Gas Utility
All Electric Efficiency Only All Electric Efficiency + NEEA All Electric Efficiency + PV All Electric Efficiency + PV + Battery On-Bill TDV On-Bill TDV On-Bill TDV On-Bill TDV
B/C
Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV CZ01 PGE 0.3 ($2,010) >1 $1,155 2.5 $610 >1 $3,162 2.2 $16,861 1.2 $2,976 1.2 $5,286 1.0 $168 CZ02 PGE 0.2 ($4,208) 3.3 $481 0.3 ($2,696) >1 $1,403 2.5 $15,218 1.5 $4,707 1.2 $3,791 1.3 $6,522 CZ03 PGE 0.1 ($6,115) 14.1 $325 0.1 ($4,828) >1 $1,206 2.3 $12,653 1.5 $4,249 1.1 $1,285 1.2 $4,720 CZ04 PGE 0.0 ($5,883) 20.7 $992 0.0 ($4,940) 34.2 $1,672 2.3 $13,081 1.7 $6,179 1.1 $1,797 1.4 $6,977 CZ04 CPAU >1 $3,951 20.7 $992 >1 $4,509 34.2 $1,672 1.7 $6,738 1.7 $6,179 0.8 ($4,973) 1.4 $6,977 CZ05 PGE 0.3 ($4,141) 0.6 ($698) 0.3 ($2,912) 1.3 $222 2.9 $15,238 1.5 $3,921 1.2 $3,903 1.2 $3,473 CZ05 PGE/SCG 0.3 ($2,831) 0.6 ($698) 0.5 ($1,602) 1.3 $222 3.1 $16,548 1.5 $3,921 1.3 $5,212 1.2 $3,473 CZ06 SCE/SCG 0.4 ($2,272) 0.996 ($5) 0.5 ($1,672) 1.7 $444 2.6 $11,941 1.8 $5,275 1.1 $2,134 1.3 $5,984 CZ07 SDGE 0.2 ($6,766) 1.0 $4 0.2 ($5,978) 1.7 $435 3.8 $22,595 1.6 $4,364 1.6 $11,005 1.2 $3,943 CZ08 SCE/SCG 0.4 ($2,380) 0.98 ($23) 0.4 ($1,832) 1.4 $334 2.5 $12,446 1.9 $6,579 1.2 $2,991 1.4 $7,829 CZ09 SCE 0.4 ($1,858) 1.1 $53 0.5 ($1,255) 1.5 $367 2.6 $12,699 1.9 $6,334 1.2 $3,232 1.5 $9,406 CZ10 SCE/SCG 0.5 ($1,556) 1.4 $280 0.6 ($800) 4.9 $828 2.7 $3,430 2.1 $2,156 0.6 ($5,734) 1.2 $2,118 CZ10 SDGE 0.2 ($7,442) 1.4 $280 0.2 ($6,395) 4.9 $828 3.1 $4,264 2.1 $2,156 0.5 ($7,385) 1.2 $2,118 CZ11 PGE 0.3 ($2,749) >1 $1,115 0.4 ($1,634) >1 $1,901 2.1 $3,811 1.8 $2,577 0.5 ($7,415) 1.3 $4,046 CZ12 PGE 0.2 ($3,692) 3.1 $430 0.3 ($2,597) >1 $1,320 2.6 $16,095 1.6 $5,047 1.2 $4,800 1.3 $6,745 CZ12 SMUD/PGE 3.1 $645 3.1 $430 >1 $1,076 >1 $1,320 1.4 $4,399 1.6 $5,047 0.7 ($6,294) 1.3 $6,745 CZ13 PGE 0.0 ($3,425) 17.9 $1,657 0.0 ($2,455) 25.7 $2,419 1.7 $2,505 1.9 $3,158 0.4 ($8,653) 1.4 $5,829 CZ14 SCE/SCG 0.0 ($3,402) 4.0 $1,280 0.0 ($2,270) 6.0 $2,097 2.4 $13,741 2.0 $8,807 1.2 $5,041 1.5 $10,045 CZ14 SDGE 0.0 ($7,519) 4.0 $1,280 0.0 ($5,884) 6.0 $2,097 3.8 $28,555 2.0 $8,807 1.8 $16,912 1.5 $10,045 CZ15 SCE/SCG 1.0 ($47) >1 $1,212 1.3 $204 >1 $1,264 3.5 $3,155 2.9 $2,387 0.6 ($5,030) 1.3 $3,480 CZ16 PG&E 0.3 ($3,414) 9.9 $748 0.3 ($2,658) >1 $1,580 2.8 $19,246 1.7 $6,200 1.4 $7,856 1.4 $7,321

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 31 Results
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12

4.4 Mixed Fuel Results
Table 20 and Table 21 show results for the Mixed Fuel Efficiency + PV + Battery package compared to the 2022 baseline for Single Family and ADU, respectively. This package is cost-effective based on TDV everywhere for the single family prototype. It’s TDV cost-effective in most cases for the ADU with the exception of Climate Zones 1 and 10. The package is cost-effective On-Bill for the single family home only in Climate Zone 1. For the ADU the package is costeffective On-Bill in Climate Zones 1, 2, 5, 7, 9, 12 in PG&E territory, 14, and 16. For the climate zones where there is no PV requirement in the base package, the addition of a new PV system substantially reduced utility costs and the high cost-effectiveness of the PV measure helped to offset the high cost of the battery system.

Table 20. Single Family Cost-Effectiveness: Mixed Fuel Efficiency + PV + Battery Climate
Zone
Electric
/Gas Utility
Efficiency
EDR2
Margin
Annual
Elec
Savings
(kWh)
Annual
Gas
Savings
(therms)
Average
Annual GHG
Reductions
(metric tons)
Utility Cost
Savings Incremental Cost On-Bill TDV
First
Year
Lifecycle
(2022$)
First
Year
Lifecycle
(2022$)
B/C
Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV
CZ01 PGE 30.0 1,577 118 1.1 $710 $18,829 $9,845 $17,192 1.1 $1,636 1.4 $5,664 CZ02 PGE 13.5 1,264 35 0.7 $419 $10,499 $8,951 $15,899 0.7 ($5,400) 1.4 $6,396 CZ03 PGE 11.2 1,073 7 0.6 $295 $7,072 $7,718 $14,333 0.5 ($7,261) 1.2 $2,956 CZ04 PGE 8.4 912 6 0.5 $244 $5,862 $8,056 $14,763 0.4 ($8,902) 1.2 $3,219 CZ04 CPAU 8.4 912 6 0.5 $159 $3,839 $8,056 $14,763 0.3 ($10,925) 1.2 $3,219 CZ05 PGE 16.8 1,186 43 0.8 $416 $10,571 $8,517 $15,361 0.7 ($4,790) 1.3 $4,171 CZ05 PGE/SCG 16.8 1,186 43 0.8 $394 $9,850 $8,517 $15,361 0.6 ($5,512) 1.3 $4,171 CZ06 SCE/SCG 9.2 894 6 0.5 $370 $8,721 $8,097 $14,780 0.6 ($6,059) 1.2 $3,134 CZ07 SDGE 8.3 841 4 0.5 $358 $9,129 $8,029 $14,709 0.6 ($5,579) 1.1 $1,612 CZ08 SCE/SCG 9.5 783 2 0.5 $381 $8,924 $7,494 $14,074 0.6 ($5,150) 1.3 $3,991 CZ09 SCE 8.6 839 3 0.5 $390 $9,148 $7,509 $14,094 0.6 ($4,946) 1.5 $5,914 CZ10 SCE/SCG 8.3 854 2 0.5 $416 $9,733 $7,139 $13,724 0.7 ($3,990) 1.2 $2,863 CZ10 SDGE 8.3 854 2 0.5 $314 $7,983 $7,139 $13,724 0.6 ($5,741) 1.2 $2,863 CZ11 PGE 11.0 1,034 27 0.7 $398 $9,903 $8,478 $15,286 0.6 ($5,383) 1.4 $5,505 CZ12 PGE 11.0 1,107 23 0.6 $364 $9,006 $8,733 $15,626 0.6 ($6,620) 1.4 $5,074 CZ12 SMUD/PGE 11.0 1,107 23 0.6 $252 $6,354 $8,733 $15,626 0.4 ($9,272) 1.4 $5,074 CZ13 PGE 9.6 1,168 5 0.6 $407 $9,736 $8,713 $15,536 0.6 ($5,801) 1.4 $5,562 CZ14 SCE/SCG 11.2 1,737 6 0.7 $663 $15,570 $9,664 $16,695 0.9 ($1,125) 1.4 $5,435 CZ14 SDGE 11.2 1,737 6 0.7 $403 $10,291 $9,664 $16,695 0.6 ($6,404) 1.4 $5,435 CZ15 SCE/SCG 8.5 532 2 0.5 $486 $11,372 $7,170 $13,536 0.8 ($2,164) 1.3 $3,451 CZ16 PG&E 22.6 1,235 115 1.2 $571 $15,439 $10,780 $18,007 0.9 ($2,568) 1.5 $8,024

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 32 Results
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12

Table 21. ADU Cost-Effectiveness: Mixed Fuel Efficiency + PV + Battery Climate
Zone
Electric
/Gas Utility
Efficiency
EDR2
Margin
Annual
Elec
Savings
(kWh)
Annual
Gas
Savings
(therms)
Average
Annual GHG
Reductions
(metric tons)
Utility Cost
Savings Incremental Cost On-Bill TDV
First
Year
Lifecycle
(2022$)
First
Year
Lifecycle
(2022$)
B/C
Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV
CZ01 PGE 24.3 3,642 79 0.8 $1,211 $29,946 $15,209 $25,617 1.2 $4,329 0.9 ($1,365) CZ02 PGE 14.5 3,451 40 0.6 $1,028 $25,019 $12,944 $22,587 1.1 $2,431 1.2 $4,938 CZ03 PGE 12.1 2,750 2 0.4 $715 $16,948 $11,077 $19,325 0.9 ($2,377) 1.1 $1,349 CZ04 PGE 12.2 2,860 2 0.4 $759 $17,992 $11,523 $19,837 0.9 ($1,845) 1.1 $2,417 CZ04 CPAU 12.2 2,860 2 0.4 $316 $7,490 $11,523 $19,837 0.4 ($12,347) 1.1 $2,417 CZ05 PGE 7.8 3,293 14 0.5 $959 $22,944 $11,409 $20,621 1.1 $2,324 1.1 $1,409 CZ05 PGE/SCG 7.8 3,293 14 0.5 $952 $22,711 $11,409 $20,621 1.1 $2,090 1.1 $1,409 CZ06 SCE/SCG 9.8 3,292 3 0.5 $815 $19,093 $11,028 $20,110 0.9 ($1,017) 1.2 $3,650 CZ07 SDGE 9.1 3,306 1 0.5 $1,172 $29,683 $11,381 $20,583 1.4 $9,100 1.1 $1,603 CZ08 SCE/SCG 10.1 3,527 1 0.5 $887 $20,746 $11,594 $20,867 0.99 ($121) 1.3 $4,990 CZ09 SCE 8.9 3,512 3 0.5 $883 $20,676 $11,361 $20,556 1.0 $120 1.4 $6,682 CZ10 SCE/SCG 9.0 729 7 0.4 $244 $5,806 $7,005 $14,720 0.4 ($8,914) 0.96 ($473) CZ10 SDGE 9.0 729 7 0.4 $206 $5,312 $7,005 $14,720 0.4 ($9,408) 0.96 ($473) CZ11 PGE 13.1 870 36 0.5 $277 $7,182 $8,022 $15,995 0.4 ($8,813) 1.1 $2,192 CZ12 PGE 12.6 3,589 33 0.6 $1,063 $25,738 $12,806 $22,393 1.1 $3,345 1.2 $4,771 CZ12 SMUD/PGE 12.6 3,589 33 0.6 $591 $14,577 $12,806 $22,393 0.7 ($7,816) 1.2 $4,771 CZ13 PGE 12.8 359 1 0.4 $77 $1,846 $7,009 $13,789 0.1 ($11,943) 1.2 $2,069 CZ14 SCE/SCG 14.2 3,624 2 0.5 $909 $21,262 $12,054 $20,466 1.0 $795 1.2 $4,545 CZ14 SDGE 14.2 3,624 2 0.5 $1,292 $32,729 $12,054 $20,466 1.6 $12,263 1.2 $4,545 CZ15 SCE/SCG 11.2 546 0 0.4 $252 $5,891 $6,588 $14,077 0.4 ($8,186) 1.1 $964 CZ16 PG&E 16.2 3,652 87 0.8 $1,178 $29,323 $13,234 $23,007 1.3 $6,316 1.2 $4,937

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 33 Results
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 Table 22 and Table 23 compare cost-effectiveness results across all the mixed fuel packages for the single family and ADU prototypes, respectively. The single family Efficiency Only package and Efficiency + PV package are cost effective based on On-Bill and TDV under most scenarios. The trends are similar for the ADU except the Efficiency Only package is not cost effective in many climate zones.

Table 22. Single Family Cost-Effectiveness: Mixed Fuel Packages Climate
Zone
Electric
/Gas Utility
Mixed Fuel Efficiency Only Mixed Fuel Efficiency + PV Mixed Fuel Efficiency + PV + Battery On-Bill TDV On-Bill TDV On-Bill TDV
B/C
Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV CZ01 PGE 2.8 $3,619 2.7 $3,160 2.4 $8,979 1.6 $3,526 1.1 $1,636 1.4 $5,664 CZ02 PGE 2.0 $1,940 2.5 $2,664 2.2 $5,608 1.8 $3,565 0.7 ($5,400) 1.4 $6,396 CZ03 PGE 1.1 $226 0.97 ($56) 1.6 $2,688 1.2 $602 0.5 ($7,261) 1.2 $2,956 CZ04 PGE 0.8 ($379) 1.1 $107 1.4 $1,493 1.2 $862 0.4 ($8,902) 1.2 $3,219 CZ04 CPAU 0.5 ($1,159) 1.1 $107 0.8 ($910) 1.2 $862 0.3 ($10,925) 1.2 $3,219 CZ05 PGE 1.4 $516 1.3 $300 2.1 $4,449 1.4 $1,359 0.7 ($4,790) 1.3 $4,171 CZ05 PGE/SCG 1.2 $303 1.3 $300 2.1 $4,235 1.4 $1,359 0.6 ($5,512) 1.3 $4,171 CZ06 SCE/SCG 0.6 ($696) 0.9 ($180) 1.5 $1,950 1.2 $757 0.6 ($6,059) 1.2 $3,134 CZ07 SDGE 1.3 $395 0.97 ($36) 2.9 $5,981 1.3 $697 0.6 ($5,579) 1.1 $1,612 CZ08 SCE/SCG 0.8 ($238) 1.1 $103 1.7 $2,013 1.4 $1,099 0.6 ($5,150) 1.3 $3,991 CZ09 SCE 0.9 ($148) 1.2 $250 1.8 $2,266 1.5 $1,229 0.6 ($4,946) 1.5 $5,914 CZ10 SCE/SCG 1.0 $5 1.2 $263 1.7 $2,323 1.4 $1,140 0.7 ($3,990) 1.2 $2,863 CZ10 SDGE 1.6 $960 1.2 $263 2.6 $5,010 1.4 $1,140 0.6 ($5,741) 1.2 $2,863 CZ11 PGE 2.0 $2,242 2.1 $2,187 2.2 $5,142 1.8 $2,824 0.6 ($5,383) 1.4 $5,505 CZ12 PGE 1.4 $949 1.6 $1,207 1.9 $4,150 1.5 $2,039 0.6 ($6,620) 1.4 $5,074 CZ12 SMUD/PGE 1.1 $131 1.6 $1,207 1.2 $933 1.5 $2,039 0.4 ($9,272) 1.4 $5,074 CZ13 PGE 1.5 $1,236 1.5 $1,160 2.0 $4,442 1.5 $1,821 0.6 ($5,801) 1.4 $5,562 CZ14 SCE/SCG 1.3 $981 1.5 $1,290 1.9 $4,917 1.6 $2,877 0.9 ($1,125) 1.4 $5,435 CZ14 SDGE 2.3 $4,109 1.5 $1,290 1.9 $4,753 1.6 $2,877 0.6 ($6,404) 1.4 $5,435 CZ15 SCE/SCG 1.7 $1,534 1.7 $1,444 1.7 $1,653 1.7 $1,465 0.8 ($2,164) 1.3 $3,451 CZ16 PG&E 1.8 $3,124 2.2 $4,123 2.2 $8,324 1.9 $5,419 0.9 ($2,568) 1.5 $8,024

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 34 Results
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 Table 23. ADU Cost-Effectiveness: Mixed Fuel Packages
Climate
Zone
Electric
/Gas Utility
Mixed Fuel Efficiency Mixed Fuel Efficiency + PV Mixed Fuel Efficiency + PV + Battery On-Bill TDV On-Bill TDV On-Bill TDV
B/C
Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV CZ01 PGE 1.6 $1,228 1.3 $616 2.1 $15,985 1.2 $2,051 1.2 $4,329 0.9 ($1,365) CZ02 PGE 0.7 ($634) 1.1 $148 2.3 $13,934 1.4 $3,499 1.1 $2,431 1.2 $4,938 CZ03 PGE 0.6 ($666) 0.7 ($475) 2.2 $9,045 1.3 $1,856 0.9 ($2,377) 1.1 $1,349 CZ04 PGE 0.5 ($941) 0.7 ($515) 2.1 $9,487 1.4 $2,679 0.9 ($1,845) 1.1 $2,417 CZ04 CPAU 0.3 ($1,507) 0.7 ($515) 0.99 ($115) 1.4 $2,679 0.4 ($12,347) 1.1 $2,417 CZ05 PGE 0.7 ($456) 0.2 ($1,141) 2.5 $13,761 1.3 $2,473 1.1 $2,324 1.1 $1,409 CZ05 PGE/SCG 0.5 ($689) 0.2 ($1,141) 2.5 $13,528 1.3 $2,473 1.1 $2,090 1.1 $1,409 CZ06 SCE/SCG 0.3 ($976) 0.6 ($638) 2.1 $9,282 1.5 $3,477 0.9 ($1,017) 1.2 $3,650 CZ07 SDGE 0.4 ($830) 0.5 ($717) 3.3 $20,716 1.3 $2,676 1.4 $9,100 1.1 $1,603 CZ08 SCE/SCG 0.3 ($1,069) 0.4 ($819) 2.1 $10,035 1.5 $4,415 0.99 ($121) 1.3 $4,990 CZ09 SCE 0.3 ($1,024) 0.5 ($780) 2.1 $10,242 1.5 $4,195 1.0 $120 1.4 $6,682 CZ10 SCE/SCG 0.4 ($1,004) 0.5 ($750) 1.4 $1,118 1.0 $71 0.4 ($8,914) 0.96 ($473) CZ10 SDGE 1.5 $721 0.5 ($750) 1.7 $2,230 1.0 $71 0.4 ($9,408) 0.96 ($473) CZ11 PGE 1.0 ($11) 1.2 $316 1.6 $2,473 1.3 $1,064 0.4 ($8,813) 1.1 $2,192 CZ12 PGE 0.6 ($761) 0.9 ($224) 2.4 $14,704 1.4 $3,458 1.1 $3,345 1.2 $4,771 CZ12 SMUD/PGE 1.0 ($70) 0.9 ($224) 1.3 $2,975 1.4 $3,458 0.7 ($7,816) 1.2 $4,771 CZ13 PGE 0.6 ($850) 1.1 $206 0.6 ($807) 1.1 $240 0.1 ($11,943) 1.2 $2,069 CZ14 SCE/SCG 1.0 $20 1.0 $107 2.2 $10,862 1.6 $4,977 1.0 $795 1.2 $4,545 CZ14 SDGE 1.5 $1,310 1.0 $107 3.7 $23,840 1.6 $4,977 1.6 $12,263 1.2 $4,545 CZ15 SCE/SCG 1.2 $411 1.1 $205 1.4 $916 1.2 $388 0.4 ($8,186) 1.1 $964 CZ16 PG&E 0.7 ($456) 1.0 $52 2.6 $17,779 1.4 $4,505 1.3 $6,316 1.2 $4,937

4.5 CARE Rate Comparison
Table 24 and Table 25 present a comparison of On-Bill cost-effectiveness results for CARE tariffs relative to standard tariffs. The all-electric code minimum package for the single family and ADU prototypes is shown in Table 24. Applying the CARE rates lowers both electric and gas utility bills for the consumer and the net impact is lower overall bills for an all-electric home and improved cost-effectiveness relative to the standard tariffs. The opposite trend occurs for the mixed fuel packages shown in Table 25 where the CARE rate lowers utility cost savings and the benefit-to-cost ratios decline.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 35 Results
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 Table 24. On-Bill Cost-Effectiveness with CARE Tariffs: All-Electric Code Minimum Climate
Zone
Electric
/Gas Utility
Single Family ADU
Standard CARE Standard CARE
B/C Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV CZ01 PGE 0.5 ($5,614) 0.8 ($997) 0.4 ($3,834) 0.7 ($1,505) CZ02 PGE 0.5 ($4,826) 0.8 ($1,281) 0.4 ($4,582) 0.6 ($2,146) CZ03 PGE 0.5 ($4,838) 0.8 ($924) 0.3 ($5,560) 0.4 ($2,733) CZ04 PGE 0.6 ($3,641) 0.96 ($215) 0.4 ($4,013) 0.7 ($1,465) CZ04 CPAU >1 $13,205 >1 $9,931 >1 $6,242 >1 $2,957
CZ05 PGE 0.6 ($3,696) 0.9 ($647) 0.5 ($3,009) 0.7 ($1,158) CZ05 PGE/SCG 0.6 ($3,793) 1.1 $444 0.6 ($1,699) 1.1 $243 CZ06 SCE/SCG 1.0 $115 1.6 $1,984 0.7 ($1,478) 0.97 ($98) CZ07 SDGE 0.5 ($5,670) 0.8 ($1,636) 0.3 ($6,571) 0.5 ($3,441) CZ08 SCE/SCG 1.1 $371 1.7 $2,073 0.7 ($1,489) 0.95 ($139) CZ09 SCE 1.0 $126 1.6 $2,001 0.8 ($953) 1.1 $261
CZ10 SCE/SCG 0.9 ($486) 1.5 $1,703 0.8 ($755) 1.2 $433
CZ10 SDGE 0.3 ($10,239) 0.5 ($4,330) 0.3 ($7,043) 0.4 ($3,645) CZ11 PGE 0.7 ($1,872) 1.1 $568 0.5 ($3,324) 0.7 ($1,344) CZ12 PGE 0.7 ($1,979) 1.1 $457 0.5 ($3,397) 0.7 ($1,395) CZ12 SMUD/PGE >1 $9,761 >1 $12,640 2.8 $1,904 >1 $4,281 CZ13 PGE 0.7 ($2,021) 1.2 $783 0.5 ($2,791) 0.7 ($991)
CZ14 SCE/SCG 0.7 ($2,475) 1.1 $505 0.6 ($2,199) 0.9 ($222) CZ14 SDGE 0.2 ($16,219) 0.4 ($7,861) 0.3 ($7,386) 0.5 ($3,249) CZ15 SCE/SCG 1.7 $2,285 2.6 $3,330 1.0 $35 1.5 $927
CZ16 PG&E 0.4 ($3,687) 0.8 ($825) 0.3 ($4,437) 0.5 ($2,157)

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 36 Results
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 Table 25. On-Bill Cost-Effectiveness with CARE Tariffs: Mixed Fuel Efficiency+ PV+ Battery Package Climate
Zone
Electric
/Gas Utility
Single Family ADU
Standard CARE Standard CARE
B/C Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV CZ01 PGE 1.1 $1,636 0.7 ($4,574) 1.2 $4,329 0.7 ($6,549) CZ02 PGE 0.7 ($5,400) 0.4 ($8,958) 1.1 $2,431 0.7 ($6,728) CZ03 PGE 0.5 ($7,261) 0.3 ($9,524) 0.9 ($2,377) 0.6 ($8,471) CZ04 PGE 0.4 ($8,902) 0.3 ($10,706) 0.9 ($1,845) 0.6 ($8,329) CZ04 CPAU 0.3 ($10,925) 0.0 ($14,763) 0.4 ($12,347) 0.0 ($19,837) CZ05 PGE 0.7 ($4,790) 0.5 ($8,377) 1.1 $2,324 0.7 ($6,030) CZ05 PGE/SCG 0.6 ($5,512) 0.4 ($8,540) 1.1 $2,090 0.7 ($6,067) CZ06 SCE/SCG 0.6 ($6,059) 0.3 ($9,638) 0.9 ($1,017) 0.6 ($8,203) CZ07 SDGE 0.6 ($5,579) 0.5 ($7,676) 1.4 $9,100 0.96 ($836) CZ08 SCE/SCG 0.6 ($5,150) 0.4 ($8,775) 0.99 ($121) 0.6 ($7,852) CZ09 SCE 0.6 ($4,946) 0.4 ($8,642) 1.0 $120 0.6 ($7,580) CZ10 SCE/SCG 0.7 ($3,990) 0.4 ($7,862) 0.4 ($8,914) 0.2 ($11,587) CZ10 SDGE 0.6 ($5,741) 0.5 ($7,396) 0.4 ($9,408) 0.3 ($10,388) CZ11 PGE 0.6 ($5,383) 0.4 ($8,671) 0.4 ($8,813) 0.3 ($11,145) CZ12 PGE 0.6 ($6,620) 0.4 ($9,617) 1.1 $3,345 0.7 ($6,094) CZ12 SMUD/PGE 0.4 ($9,272) 0.1 ($14,636) 0.7 ($7,816) 0.1 ($20,989) CZ13 PGE 0.6 ($5,801) 0.4 ($9,016) 0.1 ($11,943) 0.1 ($12,502) CZ14 SCE/SCG 0.9 ($1,125) 0.6 ($6,889) 1.0 $795 0.7 ($7,099) CZ14 SDGE 0.6 ($6,404) 0.5 ($8,940) 1.6 $12,263 1.1 $1,271 CZ15 SCE/SCG 0.8 ($2,164) 0.5 ($6,384) 0.4 ($8,186) 0.2 ($10,846) CZ16 PG&E 0.9 ($2,568) 0.6 ($7,747) 1.3 $6,316 0.8 ($4,356)

4.6 Utility Infrastructure Cost Sensitivity
Table 26 compares cost effectiveness results for the three natural gas service line extension cost scenarios presented in Table 8. The average cost scenario reflects the costs applied in the results presented in the prior sections (Table 16). The gas infrastructure cost savings are lower for the new subdivision case and higher for the infill development case. For the latter, the all-electric home is On-Bill cost-effective in all climate zones except Climate Zones 1, 2, 10 in SDG&E territory, and 14 in SDG&E territory. Table 27 presents the impact on On-Bill cost-effectiveness if the subsidies currently allowed under the utility gas main extension rules were removed per a recent CPUC Proposed Decision (see discussion in Section 3.3.2). If the subsidies were removed On-Bill cost-effectiveness improves but only enough to change the outcome in one case, Climate Zones 10 in SoCalGas territory.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 37 Results
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 Table 26. Single Family Cost-Effectiveness Comparison with Range of Natural Gas Utility Infrastructure Costs:

All-Electric Code Minimum
Climate
Zone
Electric
/Gas Utility
Average New Subdivision Infill Development
On-Bill TDV On-Bill TDV On-Bill TDV
B/C
Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV CZ01 PGE 0.5 ($5,614) >1 $5,566 0.4 ($6,838) >1 $4,476 0.9 ($718) >1 $9,926 CZ02 PGE 0.5 ($4,826) >1 $5,390 0.4 ($6,050) >1 $4,300 1.0 $70 >1 $9,750 CZ03 PGE 0.5 ($4,838) 63.5 $4,414 0.4 ($6,062) 48.1 $3,324 1.0 $57 125.3 $8,774 CZ04 PGE 0.6 ($3,641) >1 $4,929 0.4 ($4,865) >1 $3,839 1.1 $1,255 >1 $9,289 CZ04 CPAU >1 $13,205 >1 $9,217 >1 $13,205 >1 $9,217 >1 $13,205 >1 $9,217 CZ05 PGE 0.6 ($3,696) 2.5 $2,776 0.4 ($4,920) 1.9 $1,686 1.1 $1,200 4.9 $7,136 CZ05 PGE/SCG 0.6 ($3,793) 2.5 $2,776 0.4 ($5,017) 1.9 $1,686 1.1 $1,103 4.9 $7,136 CZ06 SCE/SCG 1.0 $115 3.2 $3,142 0.8 ($1,109) 2.4 $2,052 2.0 $5,011 6.2 $7,502 CZ07 SDGE 0.5 ($5,670) 3.1 $3,081 0.4 ($6,894) 2.3 $1,991 0.9 ($774) 6.0 $7,441 CZ08 SCE/SCG 1.1 $371 2.8 $2,951 0.8 ($853) 2.1 $1,861 2.1 $5,266 5.5 $7,311 CZ09 SCE 1.0 $126 3.3 $3,179 0.8 ($1,098) 2.5 $2,089 2.0 $5,022 6.4 $7,539 CZ10 SCE/SCG 0.9 ($486) 3.5 $3,285 0.7 ($1,710) 2.7 $2,195 1.8 $4,410 6.9 $7,645 CZ10 SDGE 0.3 ($10,239) 3.5 $3,285 0.3 ($11,463) 2.7 $2,195 0.7 ($5,344) 6.9 $7,645 CZ11 PGE 0.7 ($1,872) >1 $5,135 0.6 ($3,096) >1 $4,045 1.4 $3,024 >1 $9,495 CZ12 PGE 0.7 ($1,979) >1 $5,002 0.6 ($3,203) >1 $3,912 1.4 $2,917 >1 $9,362 CZ12 SMUD/PGE >1 $9,761 >1 $5,002 >1 $8,537 >1 $3,912 >1 $14,656 >1 $9,362 CZ13 PGE 0.7 ($2,021) >1 $4,904 0.5 ($3,245) >1 $3,814 1.4 $2,875 >1 $9,264 CZ14 SCE/SCG 0.7 ($2,475) >1 $4,493 0.5 ($3,699) >1 $3,403 1.3 $2,421 >1 $8,853 CZ14 SDGE 0.2 ($16,219) >1 $4,506 0.2 ($17,443) >1 $3,416 0.5 ($11,323) >1 $8,866 CZ15 SCE/SCG 1.7 $2,285 10.3 $4,247 1.3 $1,061 7.9 $3,157 3.3 $7,181 19.8 $8,607 CZ16 PG&E 0.4 ($3,687) >1 $3,139 0.3 ($4,911) >1 $2,049 1.2 $1,208 >1 $7,499

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 38 Results
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 Table 27. Single Family Cost-Effectiveness On-Bill Impact of CPUC Proposed Decision on Gas Line Extension Allowances:

All-Electric Code Minimum
Climate
Zone
Electric
/Gas Utility
No Allowances
With Allowance No Allowances
B/C
Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV
CZ01 PGE 0.5 ($5,614) 0.6 ($4,469)
CZ02 PGE 0.5 ($4,826) 0.6 ($3,681)
CZ03 PGE 0.5 ($4,838) 0.6 ($3,693)
CZ04 PGE 0.6 ($3,641) 0.7 ($2,495)
CZ04 CPAU >1 $13,205 >1 $13,205
CZ05 PGE 0.6 ($3,696) 0.7 ($2,551)
CZ05 PGE/SCG 0.6 ($3,793) 0.7 ($2,647)
CZ06 SCE/SCG 1.0 $115 1.2 $1,260
CZ07 SDGE 0.5 ($5,670) 0.6 ($4,524)
CZ08 SCE/SCG 1.1 $371 1.3 $1,516
CZ09 SCE 1.0 $126 1.2 $1,271
CZ10 SCE/SCG 0.9 ($486) 1.1 $660
CZ10 SDGE 0.3 ($10,239) 0.4 ($9,094)
CZ11 PGE 0.7 ($1,872) 0.9 ($726)
CZ12 PGE 0.7 ($1,979) 0.9 ($834)
CZ12 SMUD/PGE >1 $9,761 >1 $10,906
CZ13 PGE 0.7 ($2,021) 0.9 ($875)
CZ14 SCE/SCG 0.7 ($2,475) 0.8 ($1,329)
CZ14 SDGE 0.2 ($16,219) 0.3 ($15,088)
CZ15 SCE/SCG 1.7 $2,285 2.1 $3,430
CZ16 PG&E 0.4 ($3,687) 0.6 ($2,542)

4.7 Greenhouse Gas Reductions
Table 28 and Table 29 present greenhouse gas reductions for the single family and ADU prototypes, respectively. Savings represent average annual savings over the 30-year lifetime of the analysis. Greenhouse gas reductions are greatest for the all-electric Efficiency + PV + Battery package in all cases. For the single family homes, the all-electric code minimum case reduces greenhouse gas emissions as much or greater than the mixed fuel Efficiency + PV + Battery package in Climate Zones 1 through 4, 11, 12, 13, and 16. The trend differs for the ADU where the mixed fuel Efficiency + PV + Battery package results in more greenhouse gas savings than the all-electric code minimum in all climate zones except Climate Zones 3, 4, and 13.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 39 Results
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 Table 28: Single Family Greenhouse Gas Reductions (metric tons) Climate
Zone
Single Family All-Electric Single Family Mixed Fuel
Code
Minimum
Efficiency
Only
Efficiency
+ NEEA
Efficiency
+ PV
Efficiency
+ PV +
Battery
Efficiency
Only
Efficiency
+ PV
Efficiency
+ PV +
Battery
CZ01 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 2.2 0.4 0.5 1.1
CZ02 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.5 0.3 0.3 0.7
CZ03 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.9 1.3 0.1 0.1 0.6
CZ04 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 1.3 0.1 0.1 0.5
CZ05 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 1.1 0.1 0.1 0.8
CZ06 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.9 0.1 0.1 0.5
CZ07 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.8 0.0 0.1 0.5
CZ08 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.8 0.0 0.1 0.5
CZ09 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.9 0.0 0.1 0.5
CZ10 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.9 0.1 0.1 0.5
CZ11 0.7 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.4 0.2 0.2 0.7
CZ12 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.9 1.3 0.2 0.2 0.6
CZ13 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.8 1.3 0.1 0.1 0.6
CZ14 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.4 0.2 0.2 0.7
CZ15 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.7 0.1 0.1 0.5
CZ16 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.8 2.3 0.7 0.8 1.2

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 40 Results
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 Table 29 ADU Greenhouse Gas Savings (metric tons)
Climate
Zone
ADU All-Electric ADU Mixed Fuel
Code
Minimum
Efficiency
Only
Efficiency
+ NEEA
Efficiency
+ PV
Efficiency
+ PV +
Battery
Efficiency
Only
Efficiency
+ PV
Efficiency
+ PV +
Battery
CZ01 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.9 0.4 0.5 0.8
CZ02 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.8 0.2 0.3 0.6
CZ03 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.7 1.0 0.1 0.1 0.4
CZ04 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.7 1.0 0.0 0.1 0.4
CZ05 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.7 0.0 0.2 0.5
CZ06 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.6 0.0 0.2 0.5
CZ07 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.6 0.0 0.2 0.5
CZ08 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.7 0.0 0.2 0.5
CZ09 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.7 0.0 0.2 0.5
CZ10 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.6 0.0 0.1 0.4
CZ11 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.7 0.2 0.2 0.5
CZ12 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.7 0.1 0.3 0.6
CZ13 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.9 0.1 0.1 0.4
CZ14 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.7 1.1 0.1 0.2 0.5
CZ15 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.4
CZ16 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.7 1.0 0.4 0.5 0.8

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 41 Summary
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 5 Summary
The Reach Codes Team identified packages of energy efficiency measures as well as packages combining energy efficiency with solar PV generation and battery storage, simulated them in building modeling software, and gathered costs to determine the cost-effectiveness of multiple scenarios. The Reach Codes Team coordinated with multiple utilities, cities, and building community experts to develop a set of assumptions considered reasonable in the current market. Changing assumptions, such as the period of analysis, measure selection, cost assumptions, energy escalation rates, or utility tariffs are likely to change results.

Table 30 (all-electric) and Table 31 (mixed fuel) summarize results for each prototype and depicts the efficiency EDR2 compliance margins achieved for each climate zone and package. Because local reach codes must both exceed the Energy Commission performance budget (i.e., have a positive compliance margin) and be cost-effective, the Reach Codes Team highlighted cells meeting these two requirements to help clarify the upper boundary for potential reach code policies. All results presented in this study have a positive compliance margin. • Cells highlighted in green depict a positive compliance margin and cost-effective results using both On-Bill and TDV approaches.
• Cells highlighted in yellow depict a positive compliance and cost-effective results using either the On-Bill or TDV approach.
• Cells not highlighted depict a package that was not cost effective using either the On-Bill or TDV approach.

Following are key takeaways and recommendations from the analysis. • All-electric packages have lower GHG emissions than mixed-fuel packages in all cases, due to the clean power sources currently available from California’s power providers. • The Reach Codes Team found all-electric new construction to be feasible and cost effective based on TDV in all cases. In many cases all-electric code minimum construction results in an increase in utility costs and is not cost-effective On-Bill. Some exceptions include the SMUD and CPAU territories where lower electricity rates relative to gas rates result in lower overall utility bills. • The 2022 Title 24 Code’s new source energy metric combined with the heat pump baseline encourage allelectric construction, providing an incentive that allows for some amount of prescriptively required building efficiency to be traded off. This compliance benefit for all-electric homes highlights a unique opportunity for jurisdictions to incorporate efficiency into all-electric reach codes. Efficiency and electrification have symbiotic benefits and are both critical for decarbonization of buildings. As demand on the electric grid is increased through electrification, efficiency can reduce the negative impacts of additional electricity demand on the grid, reducing the need for increased generation and storage capacity, as well as the need to upgrade upstream transmission and distribution equipment. The Reach Codes Team recommends that jurisdictions adopting an all-electric reach code for single family buildings also include an efficiency requirement with EDR2 margins consistent with the all-electric code minimum package results in Table 30. • The code compliance margins for the ADU all-electric code minimum package are lower than for the single family prototype and code compliance can be more challenging for smaller dwelling units. As a result, the Reach Codes Team does not recommend an additional efficiency requirement for all-electric ADU ordinances. • Electrification combined with increased PV capacity results in utility cost savings and was found to be On-Bill cost effective in all cases. These results were based on today’s net energy metering rules and do not account for future changes to utility agreements, which are expected to decrease the value of PV to the consumer. • For jurisdictions interested in a reach code that allows for mixed fuel buildings the mixed fuel efficiency, PV, and battery package was found to be cost effective based on TDV in all cases. Cost effectiveness was marginal because of the high cost of the battery system. EDR2 margins ranged from 7 to 30 for the costeffective packages as is shown in Table 31. • Applying the CARE rates has the overall impact to increase utility cost savings for an all-electric building compared to a code compliant mixed fuel building, improving On-Bill cost-effectiveness.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 42 Summary
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 Local jurisdictions may also adopt ordinances that amend different Parts of the California Building Standards Code or may elect to amend other state or municipal codes. The decision regarding which code to amend will determine the specific requirements that must be followed for an ordinance to be legally enforceable. For example, jurisdictions that only want to require all-electric construction may amend Part 11 instead of Part 6 of the CA Building Code requiring review and approval by the BSC but not the Energy Commission. Reach codes that amend Part 6 of the CA Building Code and require energy performance beyond state code minimums must demonstrate the proposed changes are cost-effective and obtain approval from the Energy Commission.

Table 30. Summary of All-Electric Efficiency EDR2 Margins and Cost-Effectiveness Climate
Zone
Electric
/Gas Utility
Single Family ADU
Code Min EE EE+PV EE+PV/B Code Min EE EE+PV EE+PV/B
CZ01 PGE 8.3 18.8 18.8 29.6 0.0 15.1 15.1 24.6
CZ02 PGE 5.7 13.5 13.5 19.1 0.4 9.5 9.5 14.6
CZ03 PGE 4.7 10.5 10.5 15.8 0.0 5.7 5.7 10.5
CZ04 PGE 3.7 8.6 8.6 13.5 0.2 6.3 6.3 10.8
CZ04 CPAU 3.7 8.6 8.6 13.5 0.2 6.3 6.3 10.8
CZ05 PGE 1.1 6.1 6.1 14.3 0.4 2.4 2.4 7.9
CZ05 PGE/SCG 1.1 6.1 6.1 14.3 0.4 2.4 2.4 7.9
CZ06 SCE/SCG 2.5 7.8 7.8 11.6 0.2 6.2 6.2 9.8
CZ07 SDGE 2.3 7.0 7.0 9.9 0.4 6.3 6.3 9.1
CZ08 SCE/SCG 0.6 4.0 4.0 10.4 0.6 3.6 3.6 10.0
CZ09 SCE 1.2 4.6 4.6 9.9 0.6 3.7 3.7 8.8
CZ10 SCE/SCG 1.1 4.6 4.6 10.1 0.4 3.8 3.8 9.1
CZ10 SDGE 1.1 4.6 4.6 10.1 0.4 3.8 3.8 9.1
CZ11 PGE 3.5 8.4 8.4 14.1 0.2 7.7 7.7 13.2
CZ12 PGE 4.0 8.5 8.5 14.7 0.3 6.8 6.8 12.6
CZ12 SMUD/PGE 4.0 8.5 8.5 14.7 0.3 6.8 6.8 12.6
CZ13 PGE 2.1 6.8 6.8 12.0 0.1 6.8 6.8 11.9
CZ14 SCE/SCG 1.6 7.9 7.9 13.2 0.4 7.3 7.3 12.4
CZ14 SDGE 1.6 7.9 7.9 13.2 0.4 7.3 7.3 12.4
CZ15 SCE/SCG 1.6 4.2 4.2 8.6 1.3 6.5 6.5 11.1
CZ16 PG&E 6.0 9.7 9.7 18.1 0.1 8.8 8.8 16.4

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 43 Summary
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 Table 31. Summary of Mixed Fuel Efficiency EDR2 Margins and Cost-Effectiveness Climate
Zone
Electric
/Gas Utility
Single Family ADU
EE EE+PV EE+PV/B EE EE+PV EE+PV/B
CZ01 PGE 12.0 12.0 30.0 14.9 14.9 24.3
CZ02 PGE 8.8 8.8 13.5 9.4 9.4 14.5
CZ03 PGE 5.7 5.7 11.2 6.3 6.3 12.1
CZ04 PGE 4.8 4.8 8.4 6.7 6.7 12.2
CZ04 CPAU 4.8 4.8 8.4 6.7 6.7 12.2
CZ05 PGE 4.8 4.8 16.8 2.3 2.3 7.8
CZ05 PGE/SCG 4.8 4.8 16.8 2.3 2.3 7.8
CZ06 SCE/SCG 6.1 6.1 9.2 6.1 6.1 9.8
CZ07 SDGE 5.5 5.5 8.3 6.3 6.3 9.1
CZ08 SCE/SCG 3.5 3.5 9.5 3.6 3.6 10.1
CZ09 SCE 3.6 3.6 8.6 3.7 3.7 8.9
CZ10 SCE/SCG 3.7 3.7 8.3 3.8 3.8 9.0
CZ10 SDGE 3.7 3.7 8.3 3.8 3.8 9.0
CZ11 PGE 5.7 5.7 11.0 7.5 7.5 13.1
CZ12 PGE 5.3 5.3 11.0 6.8 6.8 12.6
CZ12 SMUD/PGE 5.3 5.3 11.0 6.8 6.8 12.6
CZ13 PGE 4.7 4.7 9.6 7.2 7.2 12.8
CZ14 SCE/SCG 6.2 6.2 11.2 8.5 8.5 14.2
CZ14 SDGE 6.2 6.2 11.2 8.5 8.5 14.2
CZ15 SCE/SCG 4.3 4.3 8.5 6.6 6.6 11.2
CZ16 PG&E 14.9 14.9 22.6 8.7 8.7 16.2

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 44 References
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 6 References
Barbose, G., Darghouth, N., O'Shaughnessy, E., & Forrester, S. (2021, October). Tracking the Sun. Pricing and Design Trends for Distributed Photovoltaic Systems in the United States 2021 Edition. Retrieved from https://emp.lbl.gov/tracking-the-sun
California Energy Commission. (2017). Rooftop Solar PV System. Measure number: 2019-Res-PV-D Prepared by Energy and Environmental Economics, Inc. Retrieved from https://efiling.energy.ca.gov/getdocument.aspx?tn=221366 California Energy Commission. (2018). 2019 Alternative Calculation Method Approval Manual for the 2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards. Retrieved from https://www.energy.ca.gov/publications/2018/2019-alternativecalculation-method-approval-manual-2019-building-energy California Energy Commission. (2021a). Express Terms for the Proposed Revisions to 2022 Title 24, Part 1 and Part 6.

Retrieved from https://efiling.energy.ca.gov/Lists/DocketLog.aspx?docketnumber=21-BSTD-01 California Energy Commission. (2021b). Final Express Terms for the Proposed Revisions to the 2022 Energy Code Reference Appendices. Retrieved from https://efiling.energy.ca.gov/Lists/DocketLog.aspx?docketnumber=21- BSTD-01
California Energy Commission. (2022, Feb). 2022 Single-Family Residential Alternative Calculation Method Reference Manual. Retrieved from https://www.energy.ca.gov/publications/2022/2022-single-family-residentialalternative-calculation-method-reference-manual California Public Utilities Commission. (2021a). Utility Costs and Affordability of the Grid of the Future: An Evaluation of Electric Costs, Rates, and Equity Issues Pursuant to P.U. Code Section 913.1. Retrieved from https://www.cpuc.ca.gov/-/media/cpuc-website/divisions/office-of-governmental-affairsdivision/reports/2021/senate-bill-695-report-2021-and-en-banc-whitepaper_final_04302021.pdf California Public Utilities Commission. (2021b). Database for Energy-Efficient resources (DEER2021 Update). Retrieved April 13, 2021, from http://www.deeresources.com/index.php/deer-versions/deer2021 California Public Utilities Commission. (2022). Proposed Decision of Commissioner Rechtschaffen: PHASE III DECISION

ELIMINATING GAS LINE EXTENSION ALLOWANCES, TEN-YEAR REFUNDABLE PAYMENT OPTION, AND FIFTY PERCENT DISCOUNT PAYMENT OPTION UNDER GAS LINE EXTENSION RULES.

E-CFR. (2020). https://www.ecfr.gov/cgibin/retrieveECFR?gp=&SID=8de751f141aaa1c1c9833b36156faf67&mc=true&n=pt10.3.431&r=PART&ty=HTM L#se10.3.431_197. Retrieved from Electronic Code of Federal Regulations: https://www.ecfr.gov/cgibin/retrieveECFR?gp=&SID=8de751f141aaa1c1c9833b36156faf67&mc=true&n=pt10.3.431&r=PART&ty=HTM L#se10.3.431_197
Energy & Environmental Economics. (2019). Residential Building Electrification in California. Retrieved from https://www.ethree.com/wpcontent/uploads/2019/04/E3_Residential_Building_Electrification_in_California_April_2019.pdf Energy + Environmental Economics. (2020). Time Dependent Valuation of Energy for Developing Building Efficiency Standards: 2022 Time Dependent Valuation (TDV) and Source Energy Metric Data Sources and Inputs.

E-Source companies. (2020). Behind-the-Meter Battery Market Study. Prepared for San Diego Gas & Electric.

Retrieved from https://www.etcc-ca.com/reports/behind-meter-battery-market-study?dl=1582149166 Horii, B., Cutter, E., Kapur, N., Arent, J., & Conotyannis, D. (2014). Time Dependent Valuation of Energy for Developing Building Energy Efficiency Standards.

Proctor, J., Wilcox, B., & Chitwood, R. (2018). Central Valley Research Homes Project. California Energy Commission.

Retrieved from
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342135376_Central_Valley_Research_Homes_Project_-- _Final_CEC_Report Page 116 of 364
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 45 References
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 Statewide CASE Team. (2017). Residential High Performance Windows & Doors Codes and Standards Enhancement (CASE) Initiative 2019 California Energy Code. Retrieved from http://title24stakeholders.com/wpcontent/uploads/2017/09/2019-T24-CASE-Report_Res-Windows-and-Doors_Final_September-2017.pdf Statewide CASE Team. (2018). Energy Savings Potential and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of High Efficiency Windows in California. Prepared by Frontier Energy. Retrieved from https://www.etcc-ca.com/reports/energy-savingspotential-and-cost-effectiveness-analysis-high-efficiency-windows-california Statewide CASE Team. (2020a). Nonresidential High Performance Envelope Codes and Standards Enhancement (CASE) Initiative 2022 California Energy Code. Prepared by Energy Solutions. Retrieved from https://title24stakeholders.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/2020-T24-NR-HP-Envelope-Final-CASEReport.pdf Statewide CASE Team. (2020b). Residential Energy Savings and Process Improvements for Additions and Alterations Codes and Standards Enhancement (CASE) Initiative 2022 California Energy Code. Prepared by Frontier Energy. Retrieved from https://title24stakeholders.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/SF-Additions-andAlterations_Final_-CASE-Report_Statewide-CASE-Team.pdf Statewide CASE Team. (2020c). Multifamily All-Electric Codes and Standards Enhancement (CASE) Initiative 2022 California Energy Code. Prepared by TRC.

Statewide Reach Codes Team. (2019, August). 2019 Cost-effectiveness Study: Low-Rise Residential New Construction.

Prepared for Pacific Gas and Electric Company. Prepared by Frontier Energy. Retrieved from https://localenergycodes.com/download/800/file_path/fieldList/2019%20Res%20NC%20Reach%20Codes Statewide Reach Codes Team. (2021a). Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Batteries in Single Family Homes. Prepared by Frontier Energy. Retrieved from
https://localenergycodes.com/download/930/file_path/fieldList/Single%20Family%20Battery%20Costeff%20Report.pdf Statewide Reach Codes Team. (2021b). 2020 Reach Code Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Detached Accessory Dwelling Units. Prepared by TRC. Retrieved from
https://localenergycodes.com/download/760/file_path/fieldList/2019%20New%20Detached%20ADUs%20Co st-effectiveness%20Report.pdf
TRC, P. E. (2021). 2020 Reach Code Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Detached Accessory Dwelling Units.

UC Berkeley Center for Community Innovation. (2021). Implementing the Backyard Revolution: Perspectives of California’s ADU Owners.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 46 Appendices
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 7 Appendices

7.1 Map of California Climate Zones
Climate zone geographical boundaries are depicted in Figure 4. The map in Figure 4 along with a zip-code search directory is available at: https://ww2.energy.ca.gov/maps/renewable/building_climate_zones.html Figure 4. Map of California climate zones.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 47 Appendices
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12

7.2 Utility Rate Schedules
The Reach Codes Team used the CA IOU and POU rate tariffs detailed below to determine the On-Bill savings for each package. The California Climate Credit was applied for both electricity and natural gas service for the IOUs using the 2022 credits shows below. 15 The credits were applied to reduce the total calculated annual bill, including any fixed fees or minimum bill amounts.

7.2.1 Pacific Gas & Electric
The following pages provide details on the PG&E electricity and natural gas tariffs applied in this study. Table 32 describes the baseline territories that were assumed for each climate zone. A net surplus compensation rate of $0.0362 / kWh was applied to any net annual electricity generation based on a one-year average of the rates between April 2021 and March 2022.
15 https://www.cpuc.ca.gov/industries-and-topics/natural-gas/greenhouse-gas-cap-and-trade-program/californiaclimate-credit

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 48 Appendices
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 Table 32: PG&E Baseline Territory by Climate Zone
Baseline
Territory
CZ01 V
CZ02 X
CZ03 T
CZ04 X
CZ05 T
CZ11 R
CZ12 S
CZ13 R
CZ16 Y
The PG&E monthly gas rate in $/therm was applied on a monthly basis for the 12-month period ending August 2021 according to the rates shown in Table 33. The corresponding CARE rates are shown in Table 34.

Table 33: PG&E Monthly Gas Rate ($/therm)
Month Procurement
Charge
Transportation Charge Total Charge
Baseline Excess Baseline Excess
Jan 2022 $0.76338 $1.33589 $1.79545 $2.09927 $2.55883
Feb 2022 $0.73412 $1.33589 $1.79545 $2.07001 $2.52957
Mar 2022 $0.61773 $1.33589 $1.79545 $1.95362 $2.41318
Apr 2021 $0.22304 $1.19868 $1.68034 $1.42172 $1.90338
May 2021 $0.21063 $1.19868 $1.68034 $1.40931 $1.89097
June 2021 $0.21778 $1.20019 $1.68243 $1.41797 $1.90021
July 2021 $0.19109 $1.20019 $1.68243 $1.39128 $1.87352
Aug 2021 $0.22551 $1.20019 $1.68243 $1.4257 $1.90794
Sept 2021 $0.44379 $1.20019 $1.68243 $1.64398 $2.12622
Oct 2021 $0.68120 $1.20019 $1.68243 $1.88139 $2.36363
Nov 2021 $0.81218 $1.20019 $1.68243 $2.01237 $2.49461
Dec 2021 $0.82555 $1.20019 $1.68243 $2.02574 $2.50798
Table 34: PG&E Monthly CARE (GL-1) Gas Rate ($/therm)
Month CARE Discount Total CARE Charge
Baseline Excess Baseline Excess
Jan 2022 ($0.41947) ($0.51139) $1.67790 $2.04554
Feb 2022 ($0.41362) ($0.50553) $1.65449 $2.02214
Mar 2022 ($0.39034) ($0.48226) $1.56138 $1.92902
Apr 2021 ($0.28372) ($0.38006) $1.13490 $1.52022
May 2021 ($0.28124) ($0.37757) $1.12497 $1.51030
June 2021 ($0.28297) ($0.37942) $1.13190 $1.51769
July 2021 ($0.27764) ($0.37408) $1.11054 $1.49634
Aug 2021 ($0.28452) ($0.38097) $1.13808 $1.52387
Sept 2021 ($0.32818) ($0.42462) $1.31270 $1.69850
Oct 2021 ($0.37566) ($0.47211) $1.50263 $1.88842
Nov 2021 ($0.40185) ($0.49830) $1.60742 $1.99321
Dec 2021 ($0.40453) ($0.50098) $1.61811 $2.00390

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 49 Appendices
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 50 Appendices
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 51 Appendices
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 52 Appendices
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 53 Appendices
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12

7.2.2 Southern California Edison
The following pages provide details on are the SCE electricity tariffs applied in this study. Table 35 describes the baseline territories that were assumed for each climate zone. A net surplus compensation rate of $0.03339 / kWh was

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 54 Appendices
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 applied to any net annual electricity generation based on a one-year average of the rates between April 2021 and March 2022.

Table 35: SCE Baseline Territory by Climate Zone
Baseline
Territory
CZ06 6
CZ08 8
CZ09 9
CZ10 10
CZ14 14
CZ15 15

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 55 Appendices
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 56 Appendices
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 57 Appendices
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12

7.2.3 Southern California Gas
Following are the SoCalGas natural gas tariffs applied in this study. Table 36 describes the baseline territories that were assumed for each climate zone.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 58 Appendices
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 Table 36: SoCalGas Baseline Territory by Climate Zone
Baseline
Territory
CZ05 2
`CZ06 1
CZ08 1
CZ09 1
CZ10 1
CZ14 2
CZ15 1
The SoCalGas monthly gas rate in $/therm was applied on a monthly basis for the 12-month period ending August 2021 according to the rates shown in Table 37. Historical natural gas rate data was only available for SoCalGas’ procurement charges. 16 To estimate total costs by month, the baseline and excess transmission charges were assumed to be relatively consistence and applied for the entire year based on January 2021 and April 2021 costs.

CARE rates reflect the 20 percent discount per the GR tariff.

Table 37: SoCalGas Monthly Gas Rate ($/therm)
Month Procurement
Charge
Transportation Charge Total Charge
Baseline Excess Baseline Excess
Jan 2022 $0.83569 $0.82487 $1.23877 $1.66056 $2.07446
Feb 2022 $0.60655 $0.82487 $1.23877 $1.43142 $1.84532
Mar 2022 $0.55921 $0.82487 $1.23877 $1.38408 $1.79798
Apr 2021 $0.31373 $0.80599 $1.20562 $1.11972 $1.51935
May 2021 $0.35684 $0.80599 $1.20562 $1.16283 $1.56246
June 2021 $0.39460 $0.80599 $1.20562 $1.20059 $1.60022
July 2021 $0.42622 $0.80599 $1.20562 $1.23221 $1.63184
Aug 2021 $0.44599 $0.80599 $1.20562 $1.25198 $1.65161
Sept 2021 $0.44425 $0.82487 $1.23877 $1.26912 $1.68302
Oct 2021 $0.57580 $0.82487 $1.23877 $1.40067 $1.81457
Nov 2021 $0.63799 $0.82487 $1.23877 $1.46286 $1.87676
Dec 2021 $0.65129 $0.82487 $1.23877 $1.47616 $1.89006
16 The SoCalGas procurement and transmission charges were obtained from the following site:
https://www.socalgas.com/for-your-business/energy-market-services/gas-prices

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 59 Appendices
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 60 Appendices
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12

7.2.4 San Diego Gas & Electric
Following are the SDG&E electricity and natural gas tariffs applied in this study. Table 38 describes the baseline territories that were assumed for each climate zone. A net surplus compensation rate of $0.04174 / kWh was applied to any net annual electricity generation based on a one-year average of the rates between April 2021 and March 2022.

Table 38: SDG&E Baseline Territory by Climate Zone
Baseline
Territory
CZ07 Coastal
CZ10 Inland
CZ14 Mountain
The SDG&E monthly gas rate in $/therm was applied on a monthly basis for the 12-month period ending August 2021 according to the rates shown in Table 39. CARE rates reflect the 20 percent discount per the G-CARE tariff.

Table 39: SDG&E Monthly Gas Rate ($/therm)
Month Procurement
Charge
Transportation Charge Total Charge
Baseline Excess Baseline Excess
Jan 2022 $0.83668 $1.43201 $1.70577 $2.26869 $2.54245
Feb 2022 $0.60727 $1.43201 $1.70577 $2.03928 $2.31304
Mar 2022 $0.55988 $1.43201 $1.70577 $1.99189 $2.26565
Apr 2021 $0.31401 $1.44464 $1.70732 $1.75865 $2.02133
May 2021 $0.35719 $1.44464 $1.70732 $1.80183 $2.06451
June 2021 $0.39498 $1.44464 $1.70732 $1.83962 $2.10230
July 2021 $0.42663 $1.44464 $1.70732 $1.87127 $2.13395
Aug 2021 $0.44642 $1.44464 $1.70732 $1.89106 $2.15374
Sept 2021 $0.44468 $1.44464 $1.70732 $1.88932 $2.15200
Oct 2021 $0.57637 $1.38238 $1.63573 $1.95875 $2.21210
Nov 2021 $0.63862 $1.38238 $1.63573 $2.02100 $2.27435
Dec 2021 $0.65194 $1.38238 $1.63573 $2.03432 $2.28767

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 61 Appendices
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 62 Appendices
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 63 Appendices
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 64 Appendices
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 65 Appendices
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12

7.2.5 City of Palo Alto Utilities
Following are the CPAU electricity and natural gas tariffs applied in this study. The CPAU monthly gas rate in $/therm was applied on a monthly basis for the 12-month period ending August 2021 according to the rates shown Page 137 of 364 Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 66 Appendices
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 in Table 40. The distribution charge was $0.4835/therm for Tier 1 and $1.0426/therm for Tier 2. The monthly service charge applied was $10.94 per month per the G-1 tariff in effect at the time of the analysis.

Table 40: CPAU Monthly Gas Rate ($/therm)
Effective
Date
Commodity
Rate
Cap and Trade
Compliance
Charge
Transportation
Charge
Carbon
Offset
Charge
G1 Tier 1
Volumetric
Totals
G1 Tier 2
Volumetric
Totals
Jan 2022 $0.77140 $0.04860 $0.15000 $0.04000 $1.53900 $1.83144 Feb 2022 $0.53600 $0.04860 $0.15000 $0.04000 $1.30360 $1.81874 Mar 2022 $0.53700 $0.04860 $0.15000 $0.04000 $1.30460 $1.8565 Apr 2022 $0.59750 $0.07680 $0.14404 $0.04000 $1.38734 $1.8363 May 2021 $0.39010 $0.04860 $0.12200 $0.04000 $1.10450 $1.8889 June 2021 $0.39820 $0.04860 $0.12214 $0.04000 $1.11274 $1.89714 July 2021 $0.48000 $0.04860 $0.12274 $0.04000 $1.22034 $2.04394 Aug 2021 $0.54920 $0.04860 $0.12274 $0.04000 $1.28954 $2.11314 Sept 2021 $0.52170 $0.04860 $0.12274 $0.04000 $1.26204 $1.78012 Oct 2021 $0.71750 $0.04860 $0.12274 $0.04000 $1.45784 $1.83222 Nov 2021 $0.75050 $0.04860 $0.12274 $0.04000 $1.49084 $1.83472 Dec 2021 $0.63210 $0.04860 $0.12274 $0.04000 $1.37244 $1.80442

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 67 Appendices
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 68 Appendices
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12

7.2.6 Sacramento Municipal Utilities District (Electric Only) Following are the SMUD electricity tariffs applied in this study.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 69 Appendices
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12

7.2.7 Fuel Escalation Assumptions
The average annual escalation rates in Table 41 were used in this study. These are based on assumptions from the CPUC 2021 En Banc hearings on utility costs through 2030 (California Public Utilities Commission, 2021a). Escalation rates through the remainder of the 30-year evaluation period are based on the escalation rate assumptions within the 2022 TDV factors. No data was available to estimate electricity escalation rates for CPAU and SMUD, therefore electricity escalation rates for PG&E and statewide natural gas escalation rates were applied.

Table 41: Real Utility Rate Escalation Rate Assumptions Statewide Natural
Gas Residential
Average Rate
(%/year, real)
Electric Residential Average Rate
(%/year, real)

PG&E SCE SDG&E
2023 4.6% 1.8% 1.6% 2.8%
2024 4.6% 1.8% 1.6% 2.8%
2025 4.6% 1.8% 1.6% 2.8%
2026 4.6% 1.8% 1.6% 2.8%
2027 4.6% 1.8% 1.6% 2.8%
2028 4.6% 1.8% 1.6% 2.8%
2029 4.6% 1.8% 1.6% 2.8%
2030 4.6% 1.8% 1.6% 2.8%
2031 2.0% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6%
2032 2.4% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6%
2033 2.1% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6%
2034 1.9% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6%
2035 1.9% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6%
2036 1.8% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6%
2037 1.7% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6%
2038 1.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6%
2039 2.1% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6%
2040 1.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6%
2041 2.2% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6%
2042 2.2% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6%
2043 2.3% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6%
2044 2.4% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6%
2045 2.5% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6%
2046 1.5% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6%
2047 1.3% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6%
2048 1.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6%
2049 1.3% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6%
2050 1.5% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6%
2051 1.8% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6%
2052 1.8% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6%

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 70 Appendices
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12

7.3 Summary of Measures by Package
Table 42 provides the details of the measures in each of the efficiency package by climate zone and case. Table 43 presents the measures for all the single family efficiency + PV + battery packages. Table 44 presents the measures for all the ADU efficiency packages.

Table 42: Single Family Efficiency Package Measures
Climate
Zone
3 ACH50
R-10
Slab Attic

0.25 Roof
Solar
Reflectance

0.24 U-Factor /

0.50 SHGC
Windows

0.35 W/cfm Buried Ducts
Basic
Compact Hot
Water Credit
1 X R-60 vs R-38 X
2 X R-60 vs R-38 X X X
3 R-60 vs R-30 X X X
4 X R-60 vs R-38 X X X
5 R-49 vs R-30 X X X
6 R-60 vs R-30 X X X
7 R-49 vs R-30 X X
8 R-60 vs R-38 X X X
9 R-60 vs R-38 X X X
10 R-60 vs R-38 X X X X
11 X R-60 vs R-38 X X X X
12 X R-60 vs R-38 X X X X
13 X R-60 vs R-38 X X X X
14 X X R-60 vs R-38 X X X X
15 X R-60 vs R-38 X X X X
16 R-60 vs R-38 X X X

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 71 Appendices
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 Table 43: Single Family Mixed Fuel Efficiency + PV + Battery Package Measures Climate
Zone
3 ACH50
R-10
Slab Attic

0.25 Roof
Solar
Reflectance

0.24 UFactor /

0.50 SHGC
Windows

0.30 UFactor /

0.50 SHGC
Windows

0.35 W/cfm
Buried
Ducts
Basic
Compact
Hot Water
Credit
1 X X X
2 X R- 49 vs R-38 X X X
3 R-38 vs R-30 X X X
4 X R-49 vs R-38 X X X
5 R-49 vs R-30 X X X
6 R- 49 vs R-30 X X X
7 R-49 vs R-30 X X
8 R- 49 vs R-38 X X X
9 R- 49 vs R-38 X X X
10 X X X X
11 X R-49 vs R-38 X X X X
12 X R- 49 vs R-38 X X X X
13 X R- 49 vs R-38 X X X X
14 X X R- 49 vs R-38 X X X X
15 X R- 49 vs R-38 X X X X
16 R- 49 vs R-38 X X X
Table 44: ADU Efficiency Package Measures
Climate
Zone
3 ACH50
R-10
Slab

0.25 Roof
Solar
Reflectance

0.24 U-Factor /

0.50 SHGC
Windows
Ductless
VCHP
Basic
Compact Hot
Water Credit
1 X X
2 X X X
3 X X
4 X X X
5 X X
6 X X
7 X X
8 X X
9 X X
10 X X X
11 X X X X
12 X X X X
13 X X X X
14 X X X X X
15 X X X X
16 X X

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 72 Appendices
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 The efficiency measures added to the All-Electric prescriptive package in Climate Zones that were not compliant are shown in Table 45 and
Table 46.

Table 45: Single Family All-Electric Code Compliant Efficiency Measures Climate
Zone

0.24 U-Factor / 0.50
SHGC Windows
Basic Compact Hot
Water Credit
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 X
16 X
Table 46: ADU All-Electric Code Compliant Efficiency Measures Climate
Zone
3 ACH50 R-49 vs R-38
Attic
Insulation

0.30 U-Factor /

0.50 SHGC
Windows

0.24 U-Factor /

0.50 SHGC
Windows
Improved HVAC
Fan Efficiency:

0.35 W/cfm
Basic Compact
Hot Water Credit
1 2
3 4 X
5 X X
6 X
7 X
8 X X
9 X X
10 X X
11 12
13 X
14 X X
15 X X
16 X X X X

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 73 Appendices
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 Get In Touch
The adoption of reach codes can differentiate jurisdictions as efficiency leaders and help accelerate the adoption of new equipment, technologies, code compliance, and energy savings strategies.

As part of the Statewide Codes & Standards Program, the Reach Codes Subprogram is a resource available to any local jurisdiction located throughout the state of California.

Our experts develop robust toolkits as well as provide specific technical assistance to local jurisdictions (cities and counties) considering adopting energy reach codes. These include cost-effectiveness research and analysis, model ordinance language and other code development and implementation tools, and specific technical assistance throughout the code adoption process.

If you are interested in finding out more about local energy reach codes, the Reach Codes Team stands ready to assist jurisdictions at any stage of a reach code project.

Visit LocalEnergyCodes.com to
access our resources and sign up
for newsletters
Contact [email protected]
for no-charge assistance from expert
Reach Code advisors
Follow us on Twitter

www.energy-solution.com
Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Cost Analysis
Report for Peninsula Clean Energy (PCE) &
Silicon Valley Clean Energy (SVCE)

1 Ed Pike contributed to this project while an employee at Energy Solutions.

To: Peninsula Clean Energy & Silicon Valley Clean Energy From: Tim Minezaki, Engineer II
Cassidee Kido, Project Manager
Ed Pike, Senior Engineer1
Energy Solutions
Date: November 20, 2019

Table of Contents

1. Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 1 EV Infrastructure: New Construction vs. Retrofit: Customer costs ................................................... 1 EV Infrastructure: Building size / Transformers ..................................................................................... 2 Reach Code Context..................................................................................................................................... 3

2. Background and Purpose ............................................................................................................................ 4 Purpose............................................................................................................................................................ 4 California’s EV Infrastructure Policy Goals .............................................................................................. 4 CALGreen and Beyond................................................................................................................................. 5

3. Cost Modeling................................................................................................................................................ 8 Scenarios ......................................................................................................................................................... 8 Buildings Types Descriptions ............................................................................................................ 8 Results............................................................................................................................................................10 Cost Savings Due to EVSE Installation in New Construction ............................................................14 EVSE Installation ................................................................................................................................14 Good Design Practices......................................................................................................................14 Methodology.......................................................................................................................................15

4. Distribution Transformer Study ..............................................................................................................17 Primary Transformers (utility-owned, often with customer costs)...................................................17 Secondary Transformers (customer-owned) .........................................................................................19 Transformer-sizing and other considerations .......................................................................................20 Appendix A: Cost Estimates by Type of Expense........................................................................................... 1 Appendix B: Permitting and Inspection Costs................................................................................................. 3 Appendix C: Methodology Details ..................................................................................................................... 4 General Assumptions.................................................................................................................................... 4 Data Sources................................................................................................................................................... 4 Soft Costs ........................................................................................................................................................ 5 Permit and Inspection Fees ............................................................................................................... 5 Construction Management................................................................................................................ 7 Raceways, Wire, and Termination Point .................................................................................................. 7 Demolition, Reconstruction, and Repaving ............................................................................................. 8 Contingencies................................................................................................................................................. 8 Transformers .................................................................................................................................................. 9 Task Descriptions ........................................................................................................................................10 Appendix D: EV Capable Installation Configurations .................................................................................... 1

1 1. Executive Summary
California and the Bay Area are on the verge of a massive transformation. Current estimates2 put electric vehicles (EVs) and plug-in hybrid vehicles (PHEVs) at a 5% market share but by 2030, that is expected to grow to 18-20%. Access to electric vehicles (EV) infrastructure is currently a major barrier for consumers’ willingness to purchase electric vehicles. Meanwhile, several studies show that installation of EV infrastructure has significant costs, most notably in a retrofit scenario which has multiple cost factors. This report investigates infrastructure costs associated with EV infrastructure reach codes by building an EV cost effectiveness model, which examined three common building types and applied different EV infrastructure penetration rates. The model also studied utility-side infrastructure, such as distribution transformers, that potentially yield additional costs and affect a building owner’s ability to comply with expanded EV infrastructure adoption, to understand the scale and frequency of those costs.

EV Infrastructure: New Construction vs. Retrofit: Customer costs The cost effectiveness model compared three building scenarios: (1) a medium 60-unit multi-unit dwelling (MUD) with 60 parking spaces, (2) a high-density 150-unit MUD with 150 parking spaces, and (3) a medium commercial office building with 60 parking spots. The model compares customer-side electrical infrastructure costs, such as wiring, switch gear, conduit, trenching, and secondary transformer. Primary transformer costs which are usually the responsibility of utilities, were considered separately in a later section3.The building models were then analyzed to compare the new construction requirements with the retrofit requirements.

Results from Table 1 below show that costs for new construction were significantly lower, at almost four times as much per spot compared to the retrofit scenario. This indicates that increasing code requirements for charging infrastructure could potentially save significant amounts of money to building owners in the new construction context rather than waiting for tenants to become interested in electric vehicles, at which point significant costs related to invasive demolition and electrical infrastructure replacement would be necessary.

Table 1. Estimated Cost of Installing EV Infrastructure (price per spot) Code Scenario:

Market Rate
25% Level 2
75% Level 1
Affordable Housing
10% Level 2
90% Level 1
Building Type
New
Construction Retrofit4 New Construction Retrofit
60-Unit MUD $1,410 $4,443 $1,049 +$3,982
150-Unit MUD $1,197 $4,101 $1,002 +$3,854
60-Space Office Building $1,166 $3,232 N/A N/A

2 http://businessportal.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/GoBIZ-EVCharging-Guidebook.pdf 3 Primary transformers are owned and operated by the utility and covered in a subsequent section but have cost components that can spill over to customer fees in multiple ways (PG&E Electric Rule 16). 4 “New Construction" and “Retrofit” costs are relative to a CALGreen 2019 mandatory baseline building

2 In a retrofit context, there are significant known costs, such as those documented in this infrastructure costing model, but there are a high level of unknown opaque costs that either are born by the utility or by the customer, which while infrequent, can cause significant burden on a small number of building owners and tenants that are not present in New Construction projects. In addition, retrofitting parking structures for Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliance can be a significant source of costs. Recent large-scale pilot studies conducted by the California utilities confirmed these cost burdens. For example, Pacific Gas & Electric’s (PG&E) EV Charge Ready program reported an “Average Cost per Port” costs for retrofit projects in their program to be almost $18,0005 with a range between $10,000 and $31,0006. The utility reports specifically call out ADA requirements and inconsistent requirements across jurisdictions, which required significant redesign costs for ADA compliance.

EV Infrastructure: Building size / Transformers
Distribution transformers are a key piece of EV infrastructure and their costs and magnitude are heavily influenced by building size. For most situations, small buildings utilize shared distribution transformers split between multiple electrical accounts; medium buildings feature a dedicated utility-owned transformer and large buildings may feature several transformers, some are utility-owned and some are customer-owned depending on the uses and electrical design of the building. The particular trigger points between building sizes are influenced by the utility rules on electrical infrastructure equipment specifications and are not comparative between utilities. The graph below illustrates when certain costs become important to assist policy makers:

Figure 1: Costs of Transformers vs. Transformer system size (PG&E service territory)7

5 Note that these costs include extensive design and re-design as well as utility side costs:

Pacific Gas and Electric Company EV Charge Network Quarterly Report (Q1-2019) 6 Q2 2019 Clean Transportation Program Advisory Council Meeting 7 This graph shows PG&E’s specific equipment sizing and is not comparable to other utilities. Calculations are based on estimates from the infrastructure cost model.
$0
$20,000
$40,000
$60,000
$80,000
$100,000
$120,000
$140,000
0 75 150 225 300 375 450 525 600 675 750 825 900 975
Transformer Cost(s) vs. Building Load (kVA)
Customer Owned (208V) Utility Owned (208V) Utility Owned (408V) 10/90 Reach Code
25/75 Reach Code
Building load CALGreen 2019 Mandatory (10%)
Utility Usually Pays
Customer Pays
UtilityUsually Pays
30 - 40 Unit MUD Page 149 of 364
3 Costs of distribution and/or service-line upgrades are partially split between customer and utility. Customers are responsible for excavation, conduits, and protective structures. Utilities are typically responsible for wiring, metering, and transformer(s) (where necessary), however, utility costs can spill over into customer costs anytime that the costs exceed the preset “allowance” for a customer, based on historical energy usage. 8 In addition, if new load, does not materialize, the utility is able to assess additional charges for the difference in expected revenue. Currently, costs are described by California Public Utilities Commission’s (CPUC) Electric Rules 2, 15, and 16 which lay out which party is responsible for these costs, however, these costs are complicated, opaque, and hard to predict. Luckily,the CPUC is tracking costs related to EV infrastructure and has found that utility-side infrastructure upgrades triggered by EV-only projects are rare. To date, for PG&E’s service territory found only 3% of projects required distribution or service-line upgrades to accommodate EV infrastructure. However those costs spanned a wide cost range from $14 to $338,274 (additional details on this study can be found in the Transformers section below).

Reach Code Context
This study investigated EV-infrastructure reach codes for communities in the jurisdiction of Silicon Valley Clean Energy (SVCE) and Peninsula Clean Energy (PCE), shown in Table 4 below. The study found that increasing the electric vehicle infrastructure requirements for new construction will save significant costs for all buildings when compared to a retrofitting. The study also found that transformer capacity limitations are not expected to occur very frequently and that even in the retrofit context most buildings should be able to meet the added load. For those that do not have significant capacity, utilizing lower power “Level 1” ports or load management may be a promising options.

Buildings near the boundary conditions highlighted above in Figure 1, in particular those that approach the 300 kVA capacity size9, face added risk of electrical infrastructure upgrade costs. For owners of those new buildings, the electrical systems would have to accommodate a second transformer and associated electrical infrastructure and the owner/developer would need to bear those costs estimated to be approximately $50,000 (or significantly more in a retrofit context).

8 Customers have an “allowance” based on their billing history to fund utility upgrades, but if allowance costs are exceeded, they are charged directly to the customer (PG&E Electric Rule 15 & Rule 16). This allowance is based on the net revenue of the customer account. In addition, if the expected load does not materialize to use the system upgrade, the utility is permitted to recover their costs from the customer. 9 For example, for a 30-40 unit MUD, this may be a consideration as shown in Figure 1.

4 2. Background and Purpose
Purpose
The purpose of this report is to provide cost analysis data on electric vehicle infrastructure and to support and inform potential adoption of reach codes for cities and municipalities in Santa Clara and San Mateo counties.

This report investigates potential reach codes that would 1) require “EV-ready” parking spaces, parking spaces which are already equipped with wiring and simply need an electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE) to provide charging, and 2) increase the EV charging space requirements for market-rate housing, affordable housing, and commercial-office buildings. The CALGreen nonresidential code currently requires only that “EV capable” parking spaces be provided, which requires conduit and electrical panel capacity for a 40 ampere, 208/240-volt circuit serving the space, but does not require wiring nor EVSE installation and associated expenses. The following table describes these EV equipment tiers:

EV Capable Includes conduit / raceways
EV Ready
(“Plug and play”)
Includes full circuit with a receptacle /
outlet
EV Installed Includes full charging capability with
EVSE
This cost report estimates the incremental costs associated with expanding EV infrastructure requirements beyond existing CALGreen 2019 mandatory requirements and compares the incremental construction costs from a new construction project with those of a retrofit project, utilizing an EV infrastructure cost model for three prototype buildings: (1) a 60-unit medium MUD, (2) a 150-unit large MUD, and (3) a medium-sized commercial office with 60 parking spaces. In all residential cases, we assumed one parking space per unit was assumed.

In addition, the report also investigates distribution current transformers, which will be increasingly important as electrical loads increase due to building and transportation electrification. Specifically, the utility rules and electrical load requirements were analyzed to determine boundary conditions where transformers would be required, the relative cost to incorporate them, and points at which multiple current transformers may be required, and the relative magnitude of those costs. The report also delineates specific situations for when transformers are utility owned and when they become a customer costs California’s EV Infrastructure Policy Goals
The increased proliferation of EV charging infrastructure supports many of California’s zero-emission vehicle adoption goals, including the objective to deploy 1.5 million zero-emission vehicles and 250,000 publicly