18 E. Erosion Control
If a Heritage tree is adjacent to or in the immediate proximity to a grade slope of 8% (23 degrees) or more, then approved erosion control or silt barriers shall be installed outside the TPZ to prevent siltation and/or erosion within the TPZ.
F. Tunneling and Directional Drilling
If Trenching or pipe installation has been approved within the TPZ, then the trench shall be either cut by hand, air spade, or by mechanically boring the tunnel under the roots with a horizontal directional drill and hydraulic or pneumatic air excavation technology. In all cases where there is tunneling or directional drilling, installation of the utility pipe, immediate backfilling with soil and soaking the TPZ within the same day. If boring is set up outside the Dripline of a Heritage tree and not directly under trunk, the depth of hole should be a minimum of 3 feet, preferably 4 feet such that it goes under the root depth of the Heritage tree. The bore hole should be offset by a distance based on the Heritage trees diameter (table below), taken from Best Management Practices- Managing Trees During Construction.
Minimum distance requirements for boring or auguring underneath tree roots.
Tree Diameter (dbh)
(centered on trunk)
Minimum offset distance Minimum length of bore
hole
15 inches 12 feet 15 feet
20 inches 15 feet 20 feet
25 inches 18 feet 25 feet
G. Tree Pruning and Surgery
The most compelling reason to prune is to develop a strong, safe framework and tree structure and to reduce hazards. If the Project Arborist recommends that a Heritage tree be pruned, the standard Pruning shall adhere as defined by the ANZI A300 Pruning Guidelines.
1. Excessive Pruning
There shall be no Excessive Pruning in accordance with Section 1.9 above.
2. Tree Workers
Pruning, as defined in Section 1.22 above, shall not be attempted by construction or contractor personnel, but shall be performed by a qualified tree care specialist or certified tree worker licensed to work in the Town.
3. Root Pruning
All root Pruning should follow the most current ANSI A300 Root Management Standard - Part 8-2013 and Root Management Best Management Practices.
19 H.Tree Removal Procedure
When Heritage trees are proposed to be removed, tree removal practices shall adhere to the procedures as prescribed in Chapter 8.10 of the Atherton Municipal Code.
I. Post Tree Protection and Preservation Plan Implementation A mitigation program is required if, as determined by the Project Arborist required Monthly Quarterly Inspection Form and/or as determined by the Town Arborist, the approved development is expected to create drought stress, dust accumulation or Soil Compaction to Heritage trees that are to be protected and preserved. To help reduce Disturbance and/or Damage, one or more of the following mitigation measures shall be implemented and supervised by the Project Arborist.
1. Irrigation Program
Irrigate to wet the soil within the TPZ during the dry season as specified by the Project Arborist.
2. Dust Control Program
During periods of extended drought, or grading, spray trunk, limbs and foliage to remove accumulated construction dust.
3. Soil Compaction Damage
Compaction of the soil is significantly detrimental to the long-term viability of Heritage trees on construction sites due to suffocation of roots. If compaction to the upper 12-inch soil within the TPZ has occurred, then one or more of the following mitigation measures shall be implemented as recommended by the Project Arborist and/or the Town Arborist.
a. Type 1 Mitigation
If an approved paving, hardscape or other compromising material encroaches within the TPZ, an aeration system shall be designed by a Certified Arborist and used within this area.
b. Type 11 Mitigation
If inadvertent compaction of the soil has occurred within the TPZ, the soil shall be loosened by a method approved by the Town Arborist, such as Vertical Mulching or Soil Fracturing.
J. Disturbance and/or Damage to Heritage Trees
1. Reporting
20 Any Disturbance and/or Damage or Injury to Heritage trees, whether accidental or otherwise, as verified by the Town Arborist, shall be reported within 6-hours to the Project Arborist and Town Arborist so that mitigation can take place. An Arborist Report shall be required and shall include, but not be limited to, the Disturbance and/or Damage that occurred and identified mitigation. All Injury to branches, trunk or to roots over 2-inches in diameter shall be reported in the Monthly Quarterly Inspection Report. Any Trenching work 10x 8x the diameter of the Heritage tree is required to be reported in the monthly Quarterly arborist report.
2. Arborist Report and Appraised Value
An Arborist Report including the Appraised Value of the tree shall be submitted to the Town Arborist. If a Heritage tree is Damaged, a Certified Arborist shall determine the Appraised Value of the Heritage tree. The formula used should also be noted. Refer to Section 1.1.
3. Mitigation
Mitigation for Disturbance and/or Damage or Injury to Heritage trees will be directed and performed under the Project Arborist’s supervision.
Typical mitigation efforts for Disturbance and/or Damage may include, but not be limited to, the following:
a. Root injury
If trenches are cut and Heritage tree roots 2-inches or larger are encountered they shall be cleanly cut back to a sound wood lateral root under the supervision of the Project Arborist. The end of the severed root shall be sealed and kept moist. All exposed root areas within the TPZ shall be backfilled or covered within one hour. Exposed roots shall be kept from drying out by temporarily covering the roots and draping layered burlap or carpeting over the upper 3-feet of trench walls. The materials shall be kept wet until backfilled to reduce evaporation from the trench walls.
b. Bark or trunk wounding
Current bark tracing and treatment methods shall be performed by a qualified tree care specialist within two days.
c. Scaffold branch or leaf canopy injury
Remove broken or torn branches back to an appropriate branch capable of resuming terminal growth within five days. If leaves are heat scorched from equipment exhaust pipes, the Project Arborist shall be informed within 6 hours. d. Fertilization and watering
21 K. Inspection Schedule
The Project Arborist shall conduct the following required inspections of construction sites containing protected Heritage trees. Inspections shall verify implementation of the approved Tree Protection and Preservation Plan as defined in Section 1.28.
1. Pre -Construction Meeting
Prior to commencement of construction, the applicant or contractor shall conduct a pre-construction meeting to discuss Heritage tree protection and the tree preservation and protections standards and specifications of this document with the job site superintendent, grading equipment operators, Project Arborist, and Town Arborist.
2. Inspection of Protective Tree Fencing
Prior to issuance of a demolition, grading, or building permit, the Project Arborist shall provide the Town Arborist with a written statement verifying that the Project Arborist has conducted a field inspection of the Heritage trees and that the protective tree fencing, and signage is in place.
3. Inspection of Rough Grading
The Project Arborist shall perform an inspection during the course of rough grading adjacent to the TPZ to ensure Heritage trees will not be Injured by compaction, cut or fill, drainage and Trenching, and if required, inspect aeration systems, tree wells, drains and special paving. The contractor shall provide the Project Arborist at least 48 hours advance notice of such activity.
4. Monthly Inspections Quarterly Report
The Project Arborist shall perform monthly inspections to monitor changing conditions and Heritage tree health. A quarterly written report is required for fullsite developments and large remodels. The written reports should be submitted to the Town Arborist quarterly on February 15th, May 15th, August 15th, and November 15th during the full length of the project. and submit a written report to the Town Arborist, referring to this document by the 15th of every month on a form as prescribed by the Town Arborist. If the 15th falls on a weekend or holiday, the report shall form shall be submitted on the next working business day. For all applicants who start their project within 45 days of the quarterly date, or the first 45 days of a quarter, the first monthly report will be provided. After the 45th day of the quarter, a report will be provided on the quarterly dates, the 15th day of February, May, August, and November. Please note a Submission shall be report is required within one month of the beginning of the excavation of the site. Submission shall be uploaded to the Town’s Public Work’s portal. by email to the Town Arborist. The written report timeline begins at issuance of the demo permit or if there is no demo permit, then at issuance of the building permit.
22 The report shall include the three months of site visits and documentation of any disturbance to trees on the site during the past months. The report shall include photos and dates of visits and or disturbance. The report shall include any mitigation measures and any recommendations for the site to address.
If issues are found by the Private Arborist, the private arborist shall make the site aware and offer recommendations and mitigation. The Private Arborist shall also contact the Town Arborist with any issues that are not resolved after each site visit.
If reports are not submitted or if issues found on site are not reported in the quarterly report, then Staff can require the quarterly reports to go back to monthly reports until all issues with reporting and on site are resolved.
5. Landscape Phase
Heritage tree protection fencing is required to remain in place during the landscape phase of each project. No Trenching for irrigation or plantings shall occur within the TPZ of Heritage trees. No irrigation should be installed within the TPZ of a Heritage Oak tree.
6. Removal of Heritage Tree protection fencing
To request removal of the fencing, a report from the Project Arborist is required to be sent to the Town Arborist stating that all work is complete, and no additional use of equipment or Trenching will occur on site.
L. Violation – Penalties and remedies
1. Any Person causing a Heritage tree to be Disturbed and/or Damaged in violation of this chapter shall submit an amount equal to half (1/2) the Appraised Value of the Heritage tree as a civil penalty in addition to the penalties as outlined in Chapter
1.20. If a Heritage tree that has been Disturbed and/or Damaged dies within one (1) year of the date of the citation, it will be presumed that the Disturbance and/or Damage caused the death and the penalties set forth in subsection 2, immediately below, shall apply instead of those herein. Any Person causing a Heritage tree to be Removed in violation of this chapter shall submit an amount equal to two (2) times the Appraised Value of the Removed Heritage tree as a civil penalty in addition to the penalties as outlined in Chapter 1.20 of the Atherton Municipal Code. Pursuant to 1.20.020 of the Atherton Municipal Code, a civil action may be commenced to abate, enjoin, or otherwise compel the cessation of violation of any provision in this chapter. In a civil action brought pursuant to this chapter in which the Town prevails, the court may award to the Town all costs of investigation and preparation for trial, the costs of trial, reasonable expenses including overhead and administrative costs incurred in prosecuting the action, and reasonable attorney fees.
23 2. Where there has been a violation, the violator shall obtain a retroactive Heritage tree removal permit for the previously conducted unlawful activity, subject to the full range of requirements and conditions as specified in Section 8.10.040 of the Atherton Municipal Code.
3. All remedies provided in this section shall be cumulative and are not exclusive.
24 Appendix I
25 Appendix II
TOWN OF ATHERTON
Heritage Tree Preservation
Standards and Specifications
December 2019
Rev 2021
Rev 2023
1
2 TOWN OF ATHERTON
HERITAGE TREE PRESERVATION
STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS
SECTION 1.00 DEFINITIONS
For the purpose and interpretation of the standards and specifications, the following definitions shall apply:
1.1 Appraised Value - means the value of a heritage tree as determined by the Town Arborist using the most recent edition of the Guide for Plant Appraisal, published by the Council of Tree and Landscape Appraisers.
1.2 Building Official - means the Director of Building and Planning or the Director's designee.
1.3 Certified Arborist – means an individual possessing a current International Society of Arboriculture arborist certification.
1.4 Cutting means the detaching or separating from a protected tree any substantial limb, branch, or root.
1.5 Dead or Dangerous Tree - means dead or dying trees, dead parts of live trees, unstable live trees (due to structural defects or other factors) that are within striking distance of people or property, or constitutes a hazard or obstruction to public access or infrastructure, as determined by the Town Arborist.
1.6 Development Project - means any construction activity that requires a Demolition, Grading, Drainage, Building Permit or Landscape Permit.
1.7 Diameter at Breast Height – measurement of truck diameter taken at 4.5 feet (or 54 inches) above the Natural Grade. The diameter may be calculated by using the following formula: DBH = circumference at 4.5 feet ÷ 3.142.
1.8 Disfavored tree - means any of the following species:
1. Acacia baileyana—Bailey Acacia
2. Acacia decurrens—Green Wattle
3. Acacia melanoxylon—Black Acacia
4. Ailanthus altissima—Tree of Heaven
3 5. Albizia julibrissin – Mimosa
6. Any species of Eucalyptus
7. Pinus radiata—Monterey Pine
It is strongly recommended that these trees not be planted in the Town of Atherton.
1.9 Disturbance and/or Damage - refers to demolition, construction, sub terrain grading activities, landscaping improvements, other development activities and/or any other action, as determined by the Building Official or Town Arborist, which may cause damage to the health of a Heritage tree , including any Heritage Tree within 15 feet of the property line. Examples include, but are not limited to, Excessive Pruning, topping, Cutting, girdling, poisoning, over-watering, unauthorized relocation or transportation of a Heritage tree, Trenching, excavating, altering the grade, compaction or paving near the tree, and screwing anything into the Heritage tree (for example, but not limited to, installing tree houses, etc.).
1.10 Dripline - means the outermost circumference of the Heritage tree’s canopy, from which water drips to the ground. When depicted on a map, the Dripline will appear as an irregularly shaped circle that follows the contour of the Heritage tree’s branches as seen from overhead.
1.11 Excessive Pruning – is considered Disturbance and/or Damage to the Heritage tree and is prohibited unless approval is granted by the Town Arborist prior to initiating the work.
The percentage and distribution of foliage to be removed shall be adjusted according to the plant’s species, age, health, and site. Topping and lion’s tailing shall be considered prohibited pruning practices for Heritage trees. ANSI A300 (Part 1)-2017 is required to be followed.
1. Lion’s tailing - The removal of interior lateral branches that results in a concentration of growth at the branch ends shall be considered an unacceptable practice.
2. Topping- Is the reduction of tree size by cutting to stubs without regard for long-term tree health or structural integrity.
1.12 Heritage tree means:
1. A tree meeting any of the following conditions:
a. An oak tree (Quercus lobata, Quercus agrifolia or Quercus douglasii) located anywhere on a lot, that has a minimum trunk circumference of forty-eight (48) inches or diameter of fifteen and two-tenths (15.2) inches, as measured at fifty-four (54) inches above the Natural Grade.
4 b. A tree located outside the Main Buildable Area, that has a minimum trunk circumference of forty-eight (48) inches or diameter of fifteen and two-tenths (15.2) inches, as measured at fifty-four (54) inches above the Natural Grade. c. A split trunk or low-branching tree located outside the Main Buildable Area, that has a minimum trunk circumference of forty-eight (48) inches or diameter of fifteen and two-tenths (15.2) inches, as measured at fifty-four (54) inches above the Natural Grade. If the trunk branches or splits below this point, the smallest circumference or diameter below the lowest branch shall be measured.
d. A multi-stemmed tree located outside the Main Buildable Area, that has a total trunk circumference of forty-eight (48) inches or total diameter of fifteen and two-tenths (15.2) inches when calculated as follows: considering at all the branches at fifty-four (54) inches above Natural Grade, add the measurement of the largest branch to onehalf the measurement of each additional branch. Reference the Guide for Plant Appraisal authored by representatives to the Council of Tree and Landscape Appraisers.
5 2. A tree so designated by the City Council, based upon findings that the particular tree is unique and of importance to the public due to its unusual age, appearance, location or other factors.
3. A tree that has been removed without a permit that cannot be measured pursuant to subsection (1), above, will be presumed to have been a Heritage tree if it meets any of the following criteria:
a. the tree has a stump of at least seventeen and three-quarters inches (17 ¾”) in diameter as measured at the Natural Grade.
b. the tree is a native oak with a minimum of 75 years of age.
6 c. the tree is any other species of tree with a minimum of 45 years of age, unless otherwise specified in this Section.
d. the tree is a redwood with a minimum age of 30 years of age. e. In the absence of remaining physical evidence, photographs and other circumstantial evidence of characteristics, including but not limited to height, canopy dimensions, and similar trees in the immediate area may be used to create a presumption that the tree was a Heritage tree.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, anyone may rebut this presumption by providing substantial evidence to the contrary to the satisfaction of the Town Arborist.
4.Exemptions: The trees listed below shall not be classified as Heritage trees, regardless of their size or age, nor shall they be used for replacement plantings:
a. Acacia baileyana—Bailey Acacia
b. Acacia decurrens—Green Wattle
c. Acacia melanoxylon—Black Acacia
d. Ailanthus altissima—Tree of Heaven
e. Albizia julibrissin – Mimosa
f. Eucalyptus—any species
1.13 Injury - means bruising, scarring, tearing or breaking of roots, bark, trunk, branches or foliage, the application of herbicide or poisoning, natural issues such as weather, insects and animals, or any other action that is likely to cause the death of or Irreparable Damage to a Heritage tree.
1.14 Irreparable Damage - means any action undertaken by a Person, as defined by the Atherton Municipal Code, foreseeably leading to the death or permanent Injury of the tree, or which places the tree in a hazardous condition or an irreversible state of decline within one year from when action was taken. The includes, but is not limited to, Cutting, topping, girdling, poisoning, Trenching or excavating within the Tree Protection Zone (TPZ) zone, altering the grade, paving in excess of fifty percent (50%) of the Dripline, excessive watering of oak trees, and Excessive Pruning.
1.15 Main Buildable Area - is the area defined by applicable setbacks in which primary development is allowed under the Atherton Municipal Code.
7 1.16 Mechanical Injury - means a noninfectious Injury which often leads to poor growth, a damaged appearance or death to the Heritage tree. Common causes of Mechanical Injury are landscape maintenance equipment, staking damage, and vehicles.
1.17 Quarterly Inspection Report - means a Quarterly written report prepared by the Project Arborist as detailed in Section 2.2.
1.18 Natural Grade- is the grade, as determined by the Town Arborist, unaffected by construction techniques such as fill, landscaping, or a berm.
1.19 Person - means anyone having a property interest in a Heritage tree. Property owners are liable under this Chapter for all violations, whether they were done directly by the property owner or someone acting on their property with or without specific authorization, including but not limited to contractors, gardeners, and maintenance persons; provided, however, it shall not include Persons acting under a right of easement without the direction of the property owner (e.g., PG&E).
1.20 Project Arborist - means a private Certified Arborist retained by the property owner for the purpose of overseeing on-site activity involving the welfare of the Heritage trees to be retained.
1.21 Protective Heritage Tree Fencing - means a temporary enclosure erected around a Heritage tree to be protected at the boundary of the Tree Protection Zone as defined by Atherton Municipal Code and Section 1.31 of this document. The fence serves three primary functions: 1) to keep the foliage, crown, branch structure and trunk clear from direct contact and damage by equipment, materials or disturbances; 2) to preserve roots and soil in an intact and non-compacted state; and 3) to identify the Tree Protection Zone in which no soil disturbance is permitted and activities are restricted. (See detail, Appendix I).
1.22 Pruning – The selective removal of plant parts to meet the specific goals and objectives of ANSI A300 (Part 1).
1.23 Root Buffer - means a temporary layer of material to protect the soil texture and roots. The buffer shall consist of (i) a base course of tree chips spread over the root area, keeping one foot clear of the trunk clear, to a 4”- 6” depth, (ii) a base course of 3/4-inch quarry gravel which shall cover the tree chips and (iii) a ¾” plywood board covering the gravel and on the surface.
1.24 Soil Compaction - means the compression of soil particles that may result from the movement or parking of heavy machinery and trucks, storage of construction materials, structures, paving, etc. within the Tree Protection Zone (TPZ).
8 1.25 Soil Fracturing - means the loosening of hard or compacted soil around a Heritage tree by means of a pneumatic soil probe that allows sudden bursts of air to crack, loosen or expand the soil to improve the root growing environment.
1.26 Street Heritage Tree - means any Heritage tree growing within the street right-of-way, outside of private property and adjacent to the applicant’s property. Please note that most trees in the Right of Way are the adjacent property owner’s maintenance responsibility per Atherton Municipal Code Chapter 12.06.
1.27 Town Arborist – An arbor culturist, is a professional in the practice of arboriculture who works for the Town and is the person designated as such by the Building Official or Director of Public Works.
1.28 Tree Protection and Preservation Plan – Prepared by a Certified Arborist and required for all Development Projects, including any site improvements at grade or sub terrain, and shall include the following minimum information for Heritage trees; A. Site Plan
A set of drawings (e.g. preliminary drawings, grading, demolition, building, utilities, landscape, irrigation, tree survey, etc.) that show existing site conditions and proposed landscape improvements, including trees to be removed, relocated or to be retained. Site plans shall include the following minimum information that may impact Heritage trees:
1. The site plan shall be scaled at 1” = 10’ or 1” = 20’ as necessary to clearly detail Heritage tree protection requirements, depending on the scope and complexity of the project and include all existing and proposed buildings and structures.
2. Include the Tree Protection Zone (TPZ), as defined in Section 1.31, measurement on the plans, which identifies the area to protect the Heritage trees and roots from disturbance and mulch to be applied within the TPZ.
3. Surveyed location, species, size/trunk diameter, Dripline area of existing Heritage trees (including Heritage trees located on neighboring property that overhang the project site) and street Heritage trees within 30-feet of the project site within the public right-of-way. Show Heritage trees on neighboring properties that are within 15’ of the property line.
a. For any development site plan which includes Heritage trees on neighboring properties within 15 feet of the property line, the project applicant shall provide a courtesy notice via certified U.S. mail of the proposed development to the property owner as per the last known name and address of such owner(s) as shown upon the current tax assessor’s records and shall provide the verification of such notice to the Town as part of the required Tree Protection and Preservation Plan.
9 4. Paving, concrete, excavation, Trenching, irrigation lines and/or grade change located within the Tree Protection Zone (TPZ), as defined in Section 1.31.
5. All proposed and existing hardscape, including but not limited to, driveways, slabs, walkways, etc. Identify proposed materials, impervious and semi-impervious surfaces.
6. Existing and proposed utility pathways with detail on the location, depth and materials for all proposed underground utilities, including, but not limited to, sewer, water, electrical, water retention tanks, etc.
7. The location of any areas where hand digging is proposed. Significant root Cutting (over 2") will require a letter from the Project Arborist which will include mitigation measures. The Town Arborist shall review any and all proposed hand digging, significant root Cutting and mitigation measures within required tree protection areas and plan approval is required prior to starting such work.
8. Surface and subsurface drainage and aeration systems to be used.
9. Walls, tree wells, retaining walls and grade change barriers, both temporary and permanent. Landscaping, irrigation and lighting within the TPZ of all Heritage trees.
Show Landscape Screening in accordance with the Atherton Municipal Code, a minimum 3X away from all Heritage trees.
10. All of the final approved site plan sheets shall reference tree protection instructions.
11. OSHA Cuts (Occupational Safety and Health administration). OSHA Cut (means a method of protecting employees from cave-ins by excavating to form sides of an excavation that are inclined away from the excavation so as to prevent cave-ins. The angle of incline required to prevent a cave-in varies with differences in such factors as the soil type, environmental conditions of exposure, and application of surcharge loads).
B. Written Inventory
A written inventory is required for all Heritage trees on the site and within 15 feet of a property line, associated with the demolition, grading and drainage and building permits and at the Town Arborist’s or Building Official’s discretion.
A Project Arborist letter report shall include:
1. A written narrative from an ISA Certified Arborist report.
2. Arborist Name, Certification # and company letterhead.
The letter report shall include the following for each Heritage tree, including any Heritage trees on neighboring properties within 15 feet of the shared property line:
10 1. Species (common and scientific name).
2. Size (diameter, height and crown spread).
3. Tree Protection Zone (TPZ) zone.
4. Condition (foliage, vigor, structural integrity, fair, good, etc.)
5. Prognosis (dangerous, imminent hazard, property damage). The Hazard Evaluation Form may be used to rate a dangerous condition. Life expectancy Location diagram (and photograph, if desired).
C. Photo Inventory
Prior to any site demolition, the applicant shall provide colored photographs all of existing Heritage trees on-site, within the public right-of-way adjacent to the property and on adjacent property within fifteen feet of the property demolition. These photographs can be integrated into the written inventory.
D. Appraisal
See Sections 1.29 “Tree Appraisal” and 1.1 and “Appraised Value”.
E. Grading & Drainage submittal:
Arborist Report/ Heritage Tree Removals / Arborist Letter, shall include but not be limited to:
1. Showing any impact to Heritage trees as a result of either grading or the installation of the proposed drainage system.
2. Recommend Heritage tree protection and which drainage and utility lines require hand digging.
3. Submit a report by a Certified Arborist that the removal of the Heritage trees indicated on the Plans is in compliance with Town regulations. The Town’s Arborist will need to review the proposed removal of any Heritage tree.
4. At the beginning of the job, prior to permit issuance, provide a letter signed by the Project Arborist who produced the Arborist Report attesting that they have reviewed the plans and the project is designed in accordance with their recommendations and the project plans are designed in accordance with their recommendations and is accordance with the Town’s Heritage Tree Ordinance and Standards documents to protect Heritage trees.
1.29 Tree Appraisal - means a method of determining the monetary value of a Heritage tree (herein “Appraised Value”), using its pre-existing condition if it has been Removed or
11 Damaged. A Project Arborist shall determine the Appraised Value as part of the required Tree Protection and Preservation Plan.
1.30 Tree Preservation Area - means the area outside the Buildable Area of the lot.
1.31 Tree Protection Zone, (TPZ) - means, unless otherwise specified by a Project Arborist or Town Arborist, is the designated protection area sufficiently large enough to protect a Heritage tree and its roots from Disturbance and/or Damage as defined in Section
8.10.020(I) of the Atherton Municipal Code. The TPZ shall be determined and shall meet all provisions as described in Section 2.2.
1.32 Trenching - means any excavation to provide irrigation, install foundations, utility lines, services, pipe, drainage or other property improvements below grade.
1.33 Verification of Tree Protection - means the Project Arborist shall verify, in writing, that all pre-construction requirements have been met.
1.34 Vertical Mulching - means auguring, hydraulic or air excavation of vertical holes within a Heritage tree's root zone to loosen and aerate the soil, typically to mitigate Soil Compaction.
SECTION 2.00 PROTECTION OF HERITAGE TREES DURING
CONSTRUCTION
The objective of this section is to reduce the negative impacts of construction on Heritage trees.
The tree protection regulations are for each Development Project to ensure the appropriate practices will be implemented in the field to eliminate or mitigate undesirable consequences that may result from construction activities associated with a Development Project as defined in Section 1.6.
Typical negative impacts that occur during construction may include:
• Mechanical Injury to roots, trunk or branches.
• Compaction of soil, which degrades the functioning roots, inhibits the development of new roots and restricts drainage.
• Changes in existing grade which can cut or suffocate roots. • Alteration of the water table - either raising or lowering. • Sterile soil conditions associated with stripping off topsoil. • Trenching for utilities and irrigation.
SECTION 2.01 HERITAGE TREE PROTECTION AND PRESERVATION
PLAN
12 Prior to commencement of a Development Project, a property owner shall have prepared a Tree Protection and Preservation Plan as defined in Section 1.28 as part of the building permit submittal.
The Tree Protection and Preservation Plan shall be prepared by a Certified Arborist with detail as specified by the Tree Preservation Standards and Specifications.
2.1 Pre-Construction Requirements
The following five components shall be incorporated within the Tree Protection and Preservation Plan prior to grading, demolition or building permit issuance:
A. Site Plan
See Section 1.28 Tree Protection and Preservation Plan.
B. Tree Protection Disclosure Statement
A statement signed by the owner of the property and permit applicant, on a form provided by the Town, acknowledging the existence of Heritage trees on the property and that the approved Tree Protection and Preservation Plan shall be implemented and adhered through the finaling of the associated building permit.
C. Verification of Tree Protection
The Project Arborist shall verify, in writing, that all pre-construction requirements have been met as set forth in Section 2.1. Written verification must be submitted to and approved by the Town Arborist prior to demolition, grading or building permit issuance.
D. Pre -Construction Meeting
The demolition, grading and general contractors are required to meet with the Project Arborist and the Town at the site prior to beginning demolition, grading or new construction to review tree protection measures and to establish haul routes, staging areas, etc.
E. Protective Tree Fencing for Heritage Trees and Street Trees
1. Fenced enclosures
Fenced enclosures shall be erected around all Heritage trees at 8x the diameter of each Heritage tree to be protected to establish the TPZ in which no soil disturbance is permitted, and various activities are restricted.
2. Size and type of fence
All Heritage trees to be preserved shall be protected with 6-foot-high, minimum 12- gauge chain link fence. Fences are to be mounted on 2-inch diameter galvanized iron posts, driven into the ground to a depth of at least 2-feet at no more than 10-foot
13 spacing (See detail, Appendix I). This detail shall appear on grading, demolition and building permit plans.
3. Duration
Heritage Tree fencing shall be erected before any demolition, grading or construction begins and remain in place until the Town Arborist approves its removal.
4. "Warning" Signs
Warning signs shall be prominently displayed on each fence side so that they are clearly visible. (See Appendix II). The signs are available at the Building Department.
5. Mulch
A 4”-6” layer of coarse mulch or woodchips shall be placed beneath the Dripline of the protected Heritage trees. Mulch is to be kept 12” from the trunk.
2.2 HERITAGE TREE PROTECTION ZONE (TPZ)
Each Heritage tree to be protected, including those within 15 of a property line on neighboring properties, shall have a designated TPZ identifying the area sufficiently large enough to protect the Heritage tree and roots from Disturbance and/or Damage as defined in Section 1.7. Within the TPZ, roots that are critical for tree survival are typically found in the upper three-foot soil horizon and may extend beyond the Dripline area. Protecting the roots in the TPZ is necessary to ensure the tree’s survival.
Diagram of roots of a typical tree
A. Tree Protection Zone (TPZ)
14 “Tree Protection Zone (TPZ)” is the designated protection area sufficiently large enough to protect a Heritage tree and its roots from Disturbance and/or Damage as defined in Section 8.10.020 F of the Atherton Municipal Code and as specified below. Unless otherwise specified below, the TPZ is a radius 10 times the diameter of a Heritage tree (expressed as 10x) measured at 4.5 feet above the Natural Grade.
The TPZ shall be determined the following way: the TPZ radius shall be 10 times the DBH (4.5’) of the trunk. For example: a 15” DBH = a 12.5-foot radius from the perimeter of the Heritage tree, or a 25-foot TPZ. Any deviation in determining the TPZ shall be in accordance with ANSI standards subject to approval by the Town Arborist.
1. R1-A Zoning District for lots of more than 10,000 square feet:
a. The TPZ is 10x away from all buildings and structures. b. The TPZ is 8x away from any new driveway.
2. R1-B Zoning District and lots in the R1-A Zoning District that are 10,000 square feet or less:
a. The TPZ is 6x away from all buildings, structures, and new driveways.
3. For all lots:
a. The TPZ is 6x away from all CMU walls and 5x away from all wood or metal fences that require a permit.
b. The TPZ is 3x from all landscaping, Landscape Screening trees and bushes. c. For replacement of existing driveways and/or new, proposed compacted surfaces, allow for replacement in the existing location, but in no cases less than 3 times (3x).
B. Town Arborist Exception From the TPZ.
A Town Arborist exception from the TPZ standards noted in Section 2.2 (A) can be considered under any of the following scenarios.
• A TPZ exception in the R1-A from 10x the diameter, down to a minimum of 8x the diameter, for all development types unless otherwise specified. • A TPZ exception in the R1-A from 6x the diameter, down to a minimum of 3x the diameter, for lots in the R1-B, or lots in the R1-A 10,000 square feet or less.
15 • A TPZ exception for all walls or fences from 6x the diameter, down to 3x the diameter.
1. An application and fee are required to be completed prior to a Town Arborist TPZ exception review. Submitting and paying for the application does not guarantee approval to reduce the TPZ. If the Town Arborist denies an application submitted for a Town Arborist exception to the TPZ, the application can be appealed to the Planning Commission in accordance with the Atherton Municipal Code.
The application for a Town Arborist TPZ exception shall be submitted to the Town of Atherton with a narrative stating why the exception is requested, what the impact to any Heritage trees would be and any identified mitigation. The following information shall accompany the application and application fee:
a. A plan showing location of the structure and the Heritage trees with size and species stated. Show TPZ zones from 5x to 10x on the plan. b. Project Arborist report – stating what the damage and mitigation would be. c. Any Trenching less than 10x the dbh is required to be hand dug including exploratory Trenching if approved to trench closer than 10x. d. The percentage of Heritage tree roots to be cut.
e. Any utility easements.
f. Any supporting letters from Menlo Fire, PG&E and/or other utility providers.
g. The Town Arborist can require a meeting at site or with all parties to discuss further.
2. Any application to be submitted shall be reviewed by the Town Arborist for demonstrated compliance with any the following criteria, to the satisfaction of the Town Arborist:
a. The utility location is required by a utility company and it cannot be moved.
A confirmation in writing from the utility is required. b. If the species is tolerant of construction based on species, health, size and age from Matheny and Clark tolerance chart.
c. There are no roots over 2” diameter that need to be cut.
16 d. Other criteria as may be required by the Town Arborist.
3. Appeal to the Planning Commission. Decisions of the Town Arborist may be appealed to the Planning Commission by filing the following:
a. A completed appeal form along with payment of the appeal fee deposit. b. A copy of the original application submitted to the Town Arborist. c. A copy of the decision made by the Town Arborist.
d. Any new information not considered by the Town Arborist.
The Planning Commission shall consider the criteria set forth above in Section 2.2 B in ruling on the outcome of any appeal of a decision of the Town Arborist.
4. Further Exceptions to the TPZ Requirements. An applicant may apply to the Planning Commission for an exception based on scenarios other than those set out in Section 2.2 B. by filing all required materials as set forth above in Section 2.2 B 1.
5. The Planning Commission may approve or reject such applications as submitted in Section 2.2 B 3 or Section 2. B 4, based on the following criteria:
a. The criteria as listed in 2.2.B.2.
b. The probability of failure which is a function of heritage tree and site conditions such as, but not limited to, structural defects, presence of disease, species history, age or remaining life span, and varying weather conditions. c. The probability of a public safety hazard, personal injury or significant property damage as a function of proximity to existing structures and objects of value and interference with utility services
d. The number, species, size and location of existing trees in the area and the effect of the requested EXCEPTION upon shade, noise buffers, protection from wind damage, air pollution, historic value, scenic beauty, health, safety and general welfare of the area and town as a whole.
e. The necessity to allow reasonable use or other enjoyment of the property when there is no demonstrated feasible alternative to the EXCEPTION while meeting other adopted goals and policies of the general plan to the greatest extent feasible.
C. Prohibited Activities
Activities prohibited within the TPZ:
1. Storage or parking vehicles, building materials, refuse, excavated spoils or dumping of poisonous materials, including but not limited to, paint, petroleum products, concrete, stucco mix, dirty water, swimming pool and/or spa water, trailer, container boxes, clean up areas, debris boxes, building materials,
17 Trenching, grade changes, tree houses, and Soil Compaction.
2. The use of tree trunks as a winch support, anchorage, as a temporary power pole, signposts or other similar function.
3. Cutting of tree roots by utility Trenching, foundation digging, placement of curbs and trenches and other miscellaneous excavation.
4. Landscaping and irrigation improvements, unless approved in accordance with Section 2.2.D below.
5. Soil disturbance, Soil Compaction or grade changes.
6. Drainage changes, including swimming pool, spa, and/or water features discharge.
7. Any other activities which cause Disturbance and/or Damage to Heritage trees as defined in Section 1.9 and or as specified in Atherton Municipal Code Section
8.10.020.
D. Permitted Activities
Activities permitted within the TPZ:
1. Mulching - During construction, it is recommended that wood chips or similar material be spread within the TPZ to a 4-to 6-inch depth, leaving the trunk clear of mulch.
2. Root Buffer - When areas within the TPZ cannot be fenced, a Root Buffer is required and shall cover the root zone in accordance with 1.23. A Root Buffer is a temporary layer of material to protect the soil texture and roots. The buffer shall consist of a base of mulch chips spread over the root area to minimum of 6 inches depth, capped by a base course of 3/4th inch quarry gravel to stabilize 3/4th inch plywood on top.
3. Irrigation, aeration, fertilizing or other beneficial practices that have been specifically approved for use by the Project Arborist within the TPZ.
18 E. Erosion Control
If a Heritage tree is adjacent to or in the immediate proximity to a grade slope of 8% (23 degrees) or more, then approved erosion control or silt barriers shall be installed outside the TPZ to prevent siltation and/or erosion within the TPZ.
F. Tunneling and Directional Drilling
If Trenching or pipe installation has been approved within the TPZ, then the trench shall be either cut by hand, air spade, or by mechanically boring the tunnel under the roots with a horizontal directional drill and hydraulic or pneumatic air excavation technology. In all cases where there is tunneling or directional drilling, installation of the utility pipe, immediate backfilling with soil and soaking the TPZ within the same day. If boring is set up outside the Dripline of a Heritage tree and not directly under trunk, the depth of hole should be a minimum of 3 feet, preferably 4 feet such that it goes under the root depth of the Heritage tree. The bore hole should be offset by a distance based on the Heritage trees diameter (table below), taken from Best Management Practices- Managing Trees During Construction.
Minimum distance requirements for boring or auguring underneath tree roots.
Tree Diameter (dbh)
(centered on trunk)
Minimum offset distance Minimum length of bore
hole
15 inches 12 feet 15 feet
20 inches 15 feet 20 feet
25 inches 18 feet 25 feet
G. Tree Pruning and Surgery
The most compelling reason to prune is to develop a strong, safe framework and tree structure and to reduce hazards. If the Project Arborist recommends that a Heritage tree be pruned, the standard Pruning shall adhere as defined by the ANZI A300 Pruning Guidelines.
1. Excessive Pruning
There shall be no Excessive Pruning in accordance with Section 1.9 above.
2. Tree Workers
Pruning, as defined in Section 1.22 above, shall not be attempted by construction or contractor personnel, but shall be performed by a qualified tree care specialist or certified tree worker licensed to work in the Town.
3. Root Pruning
All root Pruning should follow the most current ANSI A300 Root Management Standard - Part 8-2013 and Root Management Best Management Practices.
19 H.Tree Removal Procedure
When Heritage trees are proposed to be removed, tree removal practices shall adhere to the procedures as prescribed in Chapter 8.10 of the Atherton Municipal Code.
I. Post Tree Protection and Preservation Plan Implementation A mitigation program is required if, as determined by the Project Arborist required Quarterly Inspection Form and/or as determined by the Town Arborist, the approved development is expected to create drought stress, dust accumulation or Soil Compaction to Heritage trees that are to be protected and preserved. To help reduce Disturbance and/or Damage, one or more of the following mitigation measures shall be implemented and supervised by the Project Arborist.
1. Irrigation Program
Irrigate to wet the soil within the TPZ during the dry season as specified by the Project Arborist.
2. Dust Control Program
During periods of extended drought, or grading, spray trunk, limbs and foliage to remove accumulated construction dust.
3. Soil Compaction Damage
Compaction of the soil is significantly detrimental to the long-term viability of Heritage trees on construction sites due to suffocation of roots. If compaction to the upper 12-inch soil within the TPZ has occurred, then one or more of the following mitigation measures shall be implemented as recommended by the Project Arborist and/or the Town Arborist.
a. Type 1 Mitigation
If an approved paving, hardscape or other compromising material encroaches within the TPZ, an aeration system shall be designed by a Certified Arborist and used within this area.
b. Type 11 Mitigation
If inadvertent compaction of the soil has occurred within the TPZ, the soil shall be loosened by a method approved by the Town Arborist, such as Vertical Mulching or Soil Fracturing.
J. Disturbance and/or Damage to Heritage Trees
1. Reporting
20 Any Disturbance and/or Damage or Injury to Heritage trees, whether accidental or otherwise, as verified by the Town Arborist, shall be reported within 6-hours to the Project Arborist and Town Arborist so that mitigation can take place. An Arborist Report shall be required and shall include, but not be limited to, the Disturbance and/or Damage that occurred and identified mitigation. All Injury to branches, trunk or to roots over 2-inches in diameter shall be reported in the Quarterly Inspection Report. Any Trenching work 8x the diameter of the Heritage tree is required to be reported in the Quarterly arborist report.
2. Arborist Report and Appraised Value
An Arborist Report including the Appraised Value of the tree shall be submitted to the Town Arborist. If a Heritage tree is Damaged, a Certified Arborist shall determine the Appraised Value of the Heritage tree. The formula used should also be noted. Refer to Section 1.1.
3. Mitigation
Mitigation for Disturbance and/or Damage or Injury to Heritage trees will be directed and performed under the Project Arborist’s supervision.
Typical mitigation efforts for Disturbance and/or Damage may include, but not be limited to, the following:
a. Root injury
If trenches are cut and Heritage tree roots 2-inches or larger are encountered, they shall be cleanly cut back to a sound wood lateral root under the supervision of the Project Arborist. The end of the severed root shall be sealed and kept moist. All exposed root areas within the TPZ shall be backfilled or covered within one hour. Exposed roots shall be kept from drying out by temporarily covering the roots and draping layered burlap or carpeting over the upper 3-feet of trench walls. The materials shall be kept wet until backfilled to reduce evaporation from the trench walls.
b. Bark or trunk wounding
Current bark tracing and treatment methods shall be performed by a qualified tree care specialist within two days.
c. Scaffold branch or leaf canopy injury
Remove broken or torn branches back to an appropriate branch capable of resuming terminal growth within five days. If leaves are heat scorched from equipment exhaust pipes, the Project Arborist shall be informed within 6 hours. d. Fertilization and watering
21 K. Inspection Schedule
The Project Arborist shall conduct the following required inspections of construction sites containing protected Heritage trees. Inspections shall verify implementation of the approved Tree Protection and Preservation Plan as defined in Section 1.28.
1. Pre -Construction Meeting
Prior to commencement of construction, the applicant or contractor shall conduct a pre-construction meeting to discuss Heritage tree protection and the tree preservation and protections standards and specifications of this document with the job site superintendent, grading equipment operators, Project Arborist, and Town Arborist.
2. Inspection of Protective Tree Fencing
Prior to issuance of a demolition, grading, or building permit, the Project Arborist shall provide the Town Arborist with a written statement verifying that the Project Arborist has conducted a field inspection of the Heritage trees and that the protective tree fencing, and signage is in place.
3. Inspection of Rough Grading
The Project Arborist shall perform an inspection during the course of rough grading adjacent to the TPZ to ensure Heritage trees will not be Injured by compaction, cut or fill, drainage and Trenching, and if required, inspect aeration systems, tree wells, drains and special paving. The contractor shall provide the Project Arborist at least 48 hours advance notice of such activity.
4. Quarterly Report
The Project Arborist shall perform monthly inspections to monitor changing conditions and Heritage tree health. A quarterly written report is required for fullsite developments and large remodels. The written reports should be submitted to the Town Arborist quarterly on February 15th, May 15th, August 15th, and November 15th during the full length of the project. If the 15th falls on a weekend or holiday, the report shall be submitted on the next working business day. For all applicants who start their project within 45 days of the quarterly date, or the first 45 days of a quarter, the first monthly report will be provided. After the 45th day of the quarter, a report will be provided on the quarterly dates, the 15th day of February, May, August, and November. Please note a report is required within one month of the beginning of the excavation of the site. Submission shall be uploaded to the Town’s Public Work’s portal. The written report timeline begins at issuance of the demo permit or if there is no demo permit, then at issuance of the building permit.
22 The report shall include the three months of site visits and documentation of any disturbance to trees on the site during the past months. The report shall include photos and dates of visits and or disturbance. The report shall include any mitigation measures and any recommendations for the site to address.
If issues are found by the Private Arborist, the private arborist shall make the site aware and offer recommendations and mitigation. The Private Arborist shall also contact the Town Arborist with any issues that are not resolved after each site visit.
If reports are not submitted or if issues found on site are not reported in the quarterly report, then Staff can require the quarterly reports to go back to monthly reports until all issues with reporting and on site are resolved.
5. Landscape Phase
Heritage tree protection fencing is required to remain in place during the landscape phase of each project. No Trenching for irrigation or plantings shall occur within the TPZ of Heritage trees. No irrigation should be installed within the TPZ of a Heritage Oak tree.
6. Removal of Heritage Tree protection fencing
To request removal of the fencing, a report from the Project Arborist is required to be sent to the Town Arborist stating that all work is complete, and no additional use of equipment or Trenching will occur on site.
L. Violation – Penalties and remedies
1. Any Person causing a Heritage tree to be Disturbed and/or Damaged in violation of this chapter shall submit an amount equal to half (1/2) the Appraised Value of the Heritage tree as a civil penalty in addition to the penalties as outlined in Chapter
1.20. If a Heritage tree that has been Disturbed and/or Damaged dies within one (1) year of the date of the citation, it will be presumed that the Disturbance and/or Damage caused the death and the penalties set forth in subsection 2, immediately below, shall apply instead of those herein. Any Person causing a Heritage tree to be Removed in violation of this chapter shall submit an amount equal to two (2) times the Appraised Value of the Removed Heritage tree as a civil penalty in addition to the penalties as outlined in Chapter 1.20 of the Atherton Municipal Code. Pursuant to 1.20.020 of the Atherton Municipal Code, a civil action may be commenced to abate, enjoin, or otherwise compel the cessation of violation of any provision in this chapter. In a civil action brought pursuant to this chapter in which the Town prevails, the court may award to the Town all costs of investigation and preparation for trial, the costs of trial, reasonable expenses including overhead and administrative costs incurred in prosecuting the action, and reasonable attorney fees.
2. Where there has been a violation, the violator shall obtain a retroactive Heritage
23 tree removal permit for the previously conducted unlawful activity, subject to the full range of requirements and conditions as specified in Section 8.10.040 of the Atherton Municipal Code.
3. All remedies provided in this section shall be cumulative and are not exclusive.
24 Appendix I
25 Appendix II
Attachment 6 (Changes in Red)
Ordinance ______ Page 1 of 16 Date
DRAFT ORDINANCE _____
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ATHERTON TO REPEAL AND REPLACE CHAPTER 17.52 AND AMEND CHAPTERS 17.36 AND
17.60 OF THE ATHERTON MUNCIPAL CODE REGULATING ACCESSORY
DWELLING UNITS AND JUNIOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS
WHEREAS, the Town of Atherton has historically regulated the construction of accessory structures within zones designated for residential use in a manner that is consistent with the character of the Town and that values the privacy of the Town’s residents, and
WHEREAS, California has a shortage of housing and particularly affordable housing and the State Legislature has in recent years undertaken a number of measures to incentivize the construction of additional housing stock to address this shortage, and WHEREAS, the City Council supports the construction of additional housing stock throughout the state but strongly opposes the State Legislature’s approach to incentivizing such construction where that approach usurps local land use control, and WHEREAS, the City Council opposes the changes in state law that take away local land use control over the development of accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units, and makes conforming changes to the Atherton Municipal Code under protest.
The City Council of the Town of Atherton does hereby ordain as follows:
Section 1. TITLE
This Ordinance shall be known as the Town of Atherton ("Town") Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance. This Ordinance shall be applicable in the incorporated territory of the Town.
Section 2. PURPOSE & AUTHORITY
The purpose of this Ordinance is to adopt regulations governing the development of accessory dwelling units ("ADUs") and junior accessory dwelling units ("JADUs]") in accordance with the changes made to State ADU laws found at Government Code section 65852 et seq. by various Senate and Assembly Bills, including SB 13, AB 68, and AB 881.
Section 3. AMENDMENTS TO ATHERTON MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER
17.52 Chapter 17.52 is hereby deleted and re-enacted to read as follows:
Attachment 6 (Changes in Red)
Ordinance ______ Page 2 of 16 Date
Chapter 17.52
ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS
Sections:
17.52.010 Purpose.
17.52.020 Zones Allowed.
17.52.030 Definitions.
17.52.040 Development Standards and General Requirements.
17.52.050 Application Review.
17.52.010 Purpose.
The purpose of this chapter is to regulate accessory dwelling units in residential zoning districts and on residential property consistent with state law (California Government Code Section 65852 et seq.). Implementation of this chapter is intended to provide for additional housing opportunities by increasing the number of units available within existing neighborhoods while maintaining the character of the area. The City Council of the Town of Atherton adopts this chapter to comply with SB 13, AB 68, AB 881, AB 2221, and AB 2097 under protest, as it is the Council’s position that in enacting these laws, the legislature has improperly usurped local land use authority.
17.52.020 Zones Allowed.
Junior accessory dwelling units shall be allowed in all areas zoned to allow single-family residential and accessory dwelling units shall be allowed in all areas zoned to allow singlefamily residential and multifamily residential uses in compliance with the development standards set forth in section 17.52.040 (Development Standards and General Requirements) of this Chapter.
17.52.030 Definitions.
A. “Accessory dwelling unit” or “ADU” means a building or portion of a building designed for use and occupancy by people living independently of the occupants of the main residence building. The ADU shall be on the same lot as the main residence. An ADU can be an attached or a detached residential dwelling unit that provides complete independent living facilities for one or more persons and is located on a lot with a proposed or existing single-family or multifamily development. It shall include permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking, and sanitation. An accessory dwelling unit also includes the following:
1. An efficiency unit.
2. A manufactured home, as defined in Section 18007 of the Health and Safety Code.
Attachment 6 (Changes in Red)
Ordinance ______ Page 3 of 16 Date
B. “Attached accessory dwelling unit” means a newly constructed unit that is connected to the primary single-family home by at least one wall.
C. “Detached accessory dwelling unit” means an accessory dwelling unit that is not structurally attached to the main residence.
D. “Efficiency unit” means a living unit which includes all the following:
• Size of at least 150 square feet.
• For units that are not accessible or adaptable, a partial kitchen with a sink (minimum 18 inches wide), a permanently installed two or more burner cooktop and oven, hood vent, and refrigerator (minimum 10 cubic feet), each having a clear working space of not less than 30 inches in front of the counter. o Food preparation counter or counters that total at least 20 square feet. o Storage cabinets that total at least 30 cubic feet of shelf space o A separate closet.
• Compliance with light and ventilation requirements of the Atherton Building Code. • A separate bathroom containing a water closet (toilet), lavatory (bathroom sink) and bathtub and/or shower.
E. “Junior Accessory dwelling unit” or “JADU” means a unit that is no more than 500 square feet in size and contained entirely within a single-family residence. A junior accessory dwelling unit shall include an efficiency kitchen, which shall include all of the following: a cooking facility with appliances and a food preparation counter and storage cabinets that are of reasonable size in relation to the size of the junior accessory dwelling unit. A junior accessory dwelling unit may include separate sanitation facilities or may share sanitation facilities with the existing structure.
F. “Living area” for the purpose of this chapter, means the interior habitable area of a dwelling unit, including basements and attics, but does not include a garage or any accessory structure.
G. “Public transit” means a location, including, but not limited to, a bus stop or train station, where the public may access buses, trains, subways, and other forms of transportation that charge set fares, run on fixed routes, and are available to the public. Pursuant to Section 21155 of the Public Resources Code.
17.52.040 Development Standards and General Requirements.
Unless otherwise stated in Section 17.52.050 of this Ordinance, ADUs and JADUs are permitted, provided the following standards and requirements are incorporated and met.
A. Accessory Dwelling Use. All ADUs and JADUs shall be located on the same lot with an existing or proposed dwelling and considered an accessory residential use to the primary residence. ADUs and JADUs do not count towards the allowable density for the lot upon which it is located.
Attachment 6 (Changes in Red)
Ordinance ______ Page 4 of 16 Date
B. Maximum Number of ADUs and JADUs per lot.
1. One ADU and one JADU per lot with a proposed or existing single-family dwelling if all of the following apply:
a. The ADU or JADU is within the proposed space of a single-family dwelling, existing space of a single-family dwelling or in an accessory structure. The ADU may include an expansion of not more than 150 square feet beyond the same physical dimensions as an existing accessory structure. An expansion beyond the physical dimensions of an existing accessory structure shall be limited to accommodating ingress and egress. b. The space has exterior access separate from the proposed or existing single-family dwelling.
c. The side and rear setbacks are sufficient for fire and safety. d. The JADU complies with the requirements of Section 65852.22.
2. One detached, new construction, ADU that does not exceed 800 square-feet, complies with the height restrictions in this section, and provides a minimum of four-foot side and rear yard setbacks for a lot with a proposed or existing single-family dwelling. The accessory dwelling unit may be combined with a JADU.
3. On lots that allow single-family dwellings and are a minimum of two (2) acres, the property owner may have up to two (2) detached ADUs provided that one of the two units is deed restricted as low-income for a period of 15 years or more.
4. Lots that allow multifamily dwellings.
a. Multiple accessory dwelling units are allowed within the portions of existing multifamily dwelling structures that are not used as livable space, including, but not limited to, storage rooms, boiler rooms, passageways, attics, basements, or garages, if each unit complies with state building standards for dwellings.
b. At least one ADU is allowed within an existing multifamily dwelling. The total number of ADUs allowed is up to 25 percent of the existing multifamily dwelling units.
c. Not more than two ADUs that are located on a lot that has an existing or proposed multifamily dwelling, but are detached from that multifamily dwelling and are subject to applicable height limits and a four-foot rear and side setbacks.
i. If an existing multifamily dwelling has a rear or side setback of less than four feet, no modification of the existing multifamily dwelling is required as a condition of approving an ADU.
Attachment 6 (Changes in Red)
Ordinance ______ Page 5 of 16 Date
C. Floor Area Requirements.
1. No ADU or JADU may be smaller than the size required to allow an efficiency unit pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 17958.1, which is 150 square feet. The maximum size of an efficiency unit is 500 square feet.
2. The maximum size for a JADU is 500 square feet.
3. The maximum size for an ADU is 1,200 square feet.
4. The floor area of an attached ADU shall not exceed fifty percent of the existing floor area of the main residence, unless necessary to accommodate at least an 800 square foot ADU.
5. Garage and accessory structures ancillary to an ADU are not considered part of the ADU living area and are not included in the ADU floor area calculations.
D. Exemptions from Maximum Floor Area Limitations.
1. The first 800 square feet of floor area of each ADU, attached and detached, and up to five hundred square feet for each JADU shall be excluded from maximum floor area calculations.
2. Additional floor area for each ADU may be excluded from maximum floor area calculations where staff determines the following conditions are met:
a. If a detached ADU meets and/or exceeds the minimum side and rear setbacks of Chapter 17.40 Accessory Buildings and Structures, then the ADU will be allowed an additional floor area exemption beyond the first 800 square feet of floor area, up to a total of 1,200 square feet. b. If an attached ADU is located in the main buildable area and encroaches into the side and rear yard setbacks by not more than twenty percent (20%) of the required setback, then the ADU shall be allowed an additional floor area exemption beyond the first 800 square feet of floor area, up to a total of twelve 1,200 square feet.
3. No floor area limitation shall be required for any conversion of an existing legal non-conforming building to an ADU.
4. Interior stairs are exempt from floor area calculations if the stairs accommodate access to a new ADU located above an existing or proposed detached garage that complies with accessory structure setback requirements.
E. Basements.
1. Habitable basements are allowed under detached ADUs; however, these basements shall count toward the floor area of the ADU. An internal connection from the ADU to the habitable basement is required. No special structures permit is required for these basements.
Attachment 6 (Changes in Red)
Ordinance ______ Page 6 of 16 Date
2. Habitable basements are allowed under attached ADUs; however, these basements shall count toward the floor area of the ADU if located outside the main building area setback. An internal connection from the ADU to the habitable basement is required.
3. Habitable basements are allowed under a JADU; however, these basements will be considered as the basement for the main residence and will not count toward the square footage of the JADU. No internal connection from the JADU will be allowed into the basement. Basements accommodating JADUs must be within the main building area.
4. Non-habitable basements under ADUs are only allowed outside the accessory structure setback and are subject to the Heritage Tree Ordinance. Exterior access to the non-habitable basement shall be located outside the accessory structure setback.
5. The floor area of an attached ADU or JADU does not count toward the basement allowance under 17.44.030.A.
F. Setback Requirements. Except as specified below, all ADUs and JADUs shall comply with the setback requirements of the zone in which a unit is to be located.
1. JADUs shall have the same setbacks as required for the main residence.
2. A newly constructed detached or attached ADU that is 800 square feet or less must be located at least 4 feet from a side or rear property line. This type of ADU does not have a front yard setback.
a. No decks or mechanical equipment are allowed in the four-foot side and rear setback.
3. A newly constructed attached ADU that has a floor area greater than 800 square feet and no more than 1,200 square feet shall be located in the main building area. These ADUs may encroach into side and rear yard setbacks by not more than twenty percent (20%) of the required setback.
4. A newly constructed detached ADU that has a floor area greater than 800 square feet and no more than 1,200 square feet shall be located maintain the setbacks for accessory buildings.
5. A newly constructed detached ADU shall maintain the required separation distances between the proposed or existing main residence, accessory buildings and accessory structures as required in the accessory structures section of the zoning code, unless necessary to accommodate an ADU of 800 square feet ADU or less.
6. Existing Structure. No setback shall be required for an existing living area or accessory structure or a structure constructed in the same location and to the same dimensions as an existing structure that is converted to an ADU or to a portion of an ADU. A setback of at least four feet from the side and rear lot lines
Attachment 6 (Changes in Red)
Ordinance ______ Page 7 of 16 Date
is required for an accessory dwelling unit that is not converted from an existing structure or a new structure constructed in the same location and to the same dimensions as an existing structure.
7. For double frontage and corner lots, the front yard is the yard that is adjacent to the designated front property. The rear yard shall be the yard adjacent to the property line on the opposite side of the property from the designated front property line. The address for the ADU shall be on the street adjacent to the front yard.
G. Entrance Requirements. Any new attached ADU or JADU that is incorporated into a proposed or existing primary residence shall have a separate entrance facing the side or rear yard, where feasible. Any new detached ADU shall have a separate entrance facing towards the interior of the lot.
H. Height.
1. A maximum height of 16 feet is allowed for a detached ADU on a lot with an existing or proposed single-family or multifamily dwelling.
2. A maximum height of 18 feet is allowed for a detached accessory dwelling unit on a lot with an existing or proposed single-family or multifamily dwelling unit that is within one-half of one mile walking distance of a major transit stop or a high-quality transit corridor. An additional two feet in height to accommodate a roof pitch on the accessory dwelling unit that is aligned with the roof pitch of the primary dwelling unit is also allowed.
3. A maximum height of 18 feet for a detached accessory dwelling unit on a lot with an existing or proposed multifamily, multistory dwelling.
4. A maximum height of 25 feet or the allowed height of the zoning district, whichever is lower, is allowed for an accessory dwelling unit that is attached to a primary dwelling.
5. Accessory dwelling units are limited to 2 stories.
6. A maximum height of 25 feet is allowed for a detached ADU located above a garage, provided that:
a. The total height is inclusive of the garage,
b. The garage complies with the accessory structure setback requirements of the Zoning Code, and,
c. The ADU is accessed through a ground level entry vestibule and an interior stair.
d. The roofline shall be consistent with the style of the main residence. For example, a gabled roof form on the main residence shall require a gabled roof form on the ADU above garage.
Attachment 6 (Changes in Red)
Ordinance ______ Page 8 of 16 Date
e. If the second story floor area accommodating the ADU is less than the ground floor area, the residual roofing above the ground floor shall not accommodate a roof deck or balcony.
I. Heritage Tree Ordinance.
1. The Heritage Tree Ordinance does not apply to ADUs up to 800 square feet and JADUs up to 500 square feet. In all other cases, the Heritage Tree Ordinance applies. The main residence and all other accessory buildings/structures are subject to the Heritage Tree Ordinance.
2. Detached ADUs that are greater than 800 square feet may seek administrative exceptions to the Tree Protection Zone for a distance up to 6x in the R1-A zoning district. The Town Arborist will review such requests for ADUs, concurrently with review by Planning staff.
3. Any tree removal permitted by the Town in relation to the construction of an ADU must occur after the issuance of a related building permit. Such building permit must then adhere to time limits set forth in Atherton Municipal Code (AMC) Section 15.40.180. Penalties and remedies pursuant to AMC
8.10.070(B) may result in cases where trees are removed in relation to the approval of an ADU and the ADU is not constructed.
J. Privacy, Screening and Landscaping.
1. New ADUs constructed above the ground floor shall also be designed to reasonably preserve the privacy of adjacent property owners. Appropriate design techniques to preserve privacy include obscured glazing, the use of clerestory windows that are above eye level, screening treatments, locating windows toward the existing on-site residence, or providing no windows on facades facing adjacent properties.
2. Landscape screening for the ADU shall be installed to the greatest extent feasible.
3. A solid 8 foot high fence shall be provided along the entire front, side, or rear property line adjacent to where the ADU is located. Fences shall be at the property line.
4. No sidewall height limitations apply to ADUs.
K. Lighting Restrictions. Any lighting associated with an ADU or JADU shall be shielded or downlit and shall not shine onto adjoining properties, while meeting the minimum Building Code.
L. Parking Requirements.
1. No parking is required for a JADU.
Attachment 6 (Changes in Red)
Ordinance ______ Page 9 of 16 Date
2. Unless subject to one of the exceptions immediately below, each ADU shall have assigned to it one parking space per ADU. These spaces may be provided as tandem parking on an existing driveway.
3. No additional parking shall be required if one of the following conditions applies to the ADU:
a. The ADU is located within one-half mile walking distance of public transit. b. The ADU is located within an architecturally and historically significant district.
c. The ADU is part of a proposed or existing primary residence or an existing accessory structure.
d. On-street parking permits are required but not offered to the occupant of the ADU.
e. A car share vehicle is located within one block of the ADU. f. When a permit application for an ADU is submitted with a permit application to create a new single-family dwelling or a new multifamily dwelling on the same lot, provided that the ADU or the parcel satisfies any other criteria listed in this paragraph.
4. When a garage, carport, or covered parking structure is demolished in conjunction with the construction of an ADU or converted to an ADU, off-street parking spaces do not need to be replaced.
5. A demolition permit for a detached garage that is to be replaced with an ADU shall be reviewed with the application for the ADU and issued at the same time.
M. ADU Rental. An ADU or JADU may be rented separate from the primary residence but may not be sold or otherwise conveyed separate from the primary residence.
Rentals of any ADU or JADU must be for longer than thirty days.
N. Owner Occupancy. The owner occupancy requirements detailed in this section shall apply to all lawfully permitted ADUs and JADUs within the Town on a singlefamily lot:
1. ADUs and JADUs permitted before January 1, 2020. The owner-occupancy requirements applicable to the ADU or JADU at the time of its permitting shall apply.
2. For ADUs and JADUs permitted on or after January 1, 2020, no owneroccupancy requirements shall apply.
O. Passageways and Internal Connections.
1. No passageway, as defined in California Government Code Section 65852.2, that is unobstructed clear to the sky and extends from a street to one entrance
Attachment 6 (Changes in Red)
Ordinance ______ Page 10 of 16 Date
of the ADU, shall be required in conjunction with the construction of an ADU or JADU.
2. Internal connections are allowed for attached ADUs and JADUs.
3. Internal connections are not allowed for detached ADUs to other accessory buildings, unless the connection facilitates an interior stairwell that provides access to a detached ADU located above a garage.
P. Compliance with Applicable Requirements. ADUs and JADUs shall meet all applicable zoning and fire regulations and shall comply with local building codes.
Fire sprinklers shall not be required for the ADU if they are not required for the primary residence. The construction of an accessory dwelling unit shall not trigger a requirement for fire sprinklers to be installed in the existing primary dwelling.
Q. Nonconforming conditions. Nonconforming zoning conditions do not need to be corrected as part of an ADU or JADU approval. An ADU shall be approved regardless of nonconforming zoning conditions, building code violations, or unpermitted structures that do not present a threat to public health and safety and are not affected by the construction of the accessory dwelling unit.
R. Impact Fees. No impact fees will be charged on an ADU less than 750 square feet.
Any impact fees charged for an accessory dwelling unit of 750 square feet or more shall be charged proportionately in relation to the square footage of the primary dwelling unit.
S. Utility Connections. A new ADU where there is an existing main residence shall not be required to have separate utility connections. A new ADU combined with a new house shall have separate utility connections. The connection may be subject to a connection fee or capacity charge that shall be proportionate to the burden of the proposed accessory dwelling unit, based upon either its square feet or the number of its drainage fixture unit (DFU) values, as defined in the Uniform Plumbing Code adopted and published by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials, upon the water or sewer system. This fee or charge shall not exceed the reasonable cost of providing this service.
T. A certificate of occupancy for an accessory dwelling unit will only be issued after a certificate of occupancy is issued for the primary dwelling.
U. In enforcing building standards pursuant to Article 1 (commencing with Section 17960) of Chapter 5 of Part 1.5 of Division 13 of the Health and Safety Code for an accessory dwelling unit described in paragraph (1) or (2), the Town of Atherton upon request of an owner of an accessory dwelling unit for a delay in enforcement, shall delay enforcement of a building standard, subject to compliance with Section 17980.12 of the Health and Safety Code:
1. The accessory dwelling unit was built before January 1, 2020.
Attachment 6 (Changes in Red)
Ordinance ______ Page 11 of 16 Date
2. The accessory dwelling unit was built on or after January 1, 2020, in the Town of Atherton that, at the time the accessory dwelling unit was built, had a noncompliant accessory dwelling unit ordinance, but the ordinance is compliant at the time the request is made.
17.52.050 Application Review.
A completed application for an ADU or JADU that complies with the provisions of this chapter shall be considered ministerial, without discretionary review or a public hearing, within sixty days after receiving a complete application unless either:
A. The applicant requests a delay, in which case the 60-day time period is tolled for the period of the requested delay; or
B. If a permit application for an ADU or JADU is submitted along with a permit application to create a new primary residence, the Town may delay acting on the permit application for the ADU or JADU until the Town acts on the permit application to create the new primary residence. At such time the permit application for such ADU or JADU is considered, it will still be considered ministerially without discretionary review or a public hearing, regardless of its having been submitted along with an application for a new primary residence.
Section 4. AMENDMENTS TO ATHERTON MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 17.36 Chapter 17.36 is hereby amended to include Accessory Dwelling Units as a land use permitted by right as follows:
17.36.030 Allowed Uses and Permit Requirements.
Table 17.36.030-1 (Allowed Uses and Permit Requirements for PFS District) identifies the allowed uses in the PFS district subject to the development standards of this chapter and all other provisions of this title. Allowed use provisions are symbolized in the table as follows:
P = Land use permitted by right
CUP = Land use permitted with
approval of a conditional
use permit
L/ER = Land use permitted with
location and environmental
review
Attachment 6 (Changes in Red)
Ordinance ______ Page 12 of 16 Date
Table 17.36.030-1. Allowed Uses and Permit Requirements for PFS District Zoning
District
Land Use
PFS
Public library P
Public school P
Town corporation
yard
P
Town hall and
associated
community uses
P
Accessory Dwelling
Unit in conjunction
with multifamily
residential uses
P
Emergency shelters P4
Churches and places
of worship
CUP
Convents CUP
Country clubs CUP
Residential
associated with
primary
CUP
Attachment 6 (Changes in Red)
Ordinance ______ Page 13 of 16 Date
Zoning
District
Land Use
PFS
nonresidential use of
property on same
site1
Multiple-family
residential uses that
could accommodate
housing for very lowand low-income
households
associated with
primary
nonresidential use of
property on same site
L/ER5
Private schools CUP2, 3
Public utilities and
facilities, uses, and
structures
CUP
Transportation
terminal facilities
CUP
Notes:
1 Examples include dorms or teacher housing associated with school site, convent when associated with religious institutions, etc.
2 Where a master plan for a private school has been prepared and filed with the town for public record, any application for a conditional use permit shall be compared to the master plan for consistency with that document. All building and/or faculty changes, improvements, or new construction shall require a conditional use permit. To that end, all conditional use permit applications shall include the following:
a. Maps and diagrams showing the proposal in relation to the master plan layout; b. History of student and faculty growth and projections of future growth, including an analysis of that growth’s consistency with the master plan projections;
Attachment 6 (Changes in Red)
Ordinance ______ Page 14 of 16 Date
c. A traffic and parking analysis of the proposal and comparison to the master plan projections;
d. A circulation plan showing how the traffic and pedestrian circulation will function upon implementation of the proposals; and
e. Other information that might be required for specific proposals, such as noise analyses, lighting plans, landscape screening plans, heritage tree locations, and other similar information.
3 In addition to other conditions of approval, the planning commission shall require the following items where relevant:
a. Identification of the approved uses and hours of operation; and b. Clustering of high intensity or noise-intense structures and uses (such as gymnasiums, theaters, athletic facilities) away from neighboring residential uses, where possible.
4 Emergency shelters shall be permitted only when located within the Town Civic Center property; defined as Lots 1, 2, 24, 25 and 26, Watlinton Park RSM (Resubdivision Maps) 5/8.
5 Where a master plan for a private school has been prepared and filed with the town for public record that includes multifamily residential uses that could accommodate housing for very low- and low-income households, such multifamily residential uses shall be subject to planning commission public hearing and review of the location, size, proximity to heritage trees and environmental aspects of the project but shall not result in the denial of the use.
Section 5. AMENDMENTS TO ATHERTON MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER
17.60 Chapter 17.60 is hereby amended to the definition of "Kitchen" and add the definition of "Efficiency Kitchen,” as follows:
“Kitchen” means any room or area intended or designed to be used or maintained for the cooking, storing, and preparation of food and includes facilities for cleaning, preparation, and storage of food and cooking and eating utensils. A standard kitchen shall have the following:
1. A cooktop, oven, hood vent
2. A refrigerator that has the following minimum dimensions 28 inches wide and 61 inches tall
3. Sink 24 inches wide with at least a 1.5 inch drain
4. Dishwasher
5. Food preparation counter or counters that total at least 20 square feet
6. Storage cabinets that total at least 40 square feet of shelf space
7. Kitchen area of at least 80 square feet
Attachment 6 (Changes in Red)
Ordinance ______ Page 15 of 16 Date
“Efficiency Kitchen” means a kitchen that includes each of the following:
1. A cook top, oven, and hood vent
2. Sink that is at least 18 inches wide with at least a 1.5 inch drain
3. Food preparation counter or counters that total at least 10 square feet in area.
4. Storage cabinets that total at least 30 square feet of shelf space.
5. Kitchen area of at least 50 sq. ft.
Section 6. SEVERABILITY & REVIVAL OF PRIOR TOWN ADU ORDINANCE If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the Ordinance and the application of such provision to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby. To the extent that prior Town ordinances governed any portion of this Ordinance held invalid, such prior Town ordinances shall again become effective if any portion of this Ordinance is held invalid.
Section 7: EFFECTIVE DATE
This Ordinance shall be posted in at least three public places according to law and shall take effect and be in force from and after 30 days after its passage and adoption.
Town of Atherton, a municipal corporation
MAYOR: __________________________________
BILL WIDMER
ATTEST: __________________________________
ANTHONY SUBER, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM: __________________________________
ANDREAS BOOHER, CITY ATTORNEY
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN MATEO SS:
TOWN OF ATHERTON
Attachment 6 (Changes in Red)
Ordinance ______ Page 16 of 16 Date
I, Anthony Suber, City Clerk of the Town of Atherton, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance had its first reading and was introduced during the public meeting of the City Council on the __th day of _________, and had its second reading and was adopted and passed during the public meeting of the City Council on the ____st day of _______, 2023, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST: __________________________
ANTHONY SUBER
City Clerk
Item No. 9
Town of Atherton
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT – PUBLIC HEARINGS
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
GEORGE RODERICKS, CITY MANAGER
FROM: BRITTANY BENDIX, TOWN PLANNER
DATE: NOVEMBER 15, 2023
SUBJECT: INTRODUCE AN ORDINANCE TO REAPEAL AND REPLACE
ATHERTON MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 17.52 “ACCESSORY
DWELLING UNITS,” AND TO AMEND CHAPTER 17.36 “PUBLIC
FACILITIES AND SCHOOLS DISTRICT (PFS)” AND CHAPTER 17.60 “DEFINITIONS.”
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council conduct a public hearing to introduce an ordinance that repeals and replaces Chapter 17.52 “Accessory Dwelling Units” and amends Chapter 17.36 “Public Facilities and Schools District (PFS)” and Chapter 17.60 “Definitions.”
BACKGROUND
In January of this year the Town initiated an effort to update its Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Ordinance to align with recent changes in State law, as well as the Town’s adopted Housing Element for 2023-2031. Given the breadth of changes required to align with state law and a desire to apply local standards, the Town held a joint study session with the Planning Commission and City Council on May 10, 2023. The staff report and supplemental list of questions and answers that facilitated the study session are provided at Attachments 1 and 2. A link to the recording of the session is provided at Attachment 3.
The study session provided valuable direction on many items and on October 25, 2023, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider updates to the Accessory Dwelling Ordinance. The staff report for the October 25, 2023, Planning Commission meeting (Attachment 4) summarizes the discussion at the study session and highlighted the following five topic areas where staff sought special attention from the Commissioners:
1. Definitions*
2. Accessory Dwelling Use* Page 230 of 330
ADU Ordinance Update
November 15, 2023
3. Maximum Number of Units*
4. Exemptions from Maximum Floor Area Requirements*
5. Height*
6. Heritage Trees*
7. Privacy, Screening and Landscaping*
8. Owner Occupancy*
After discussion of these topics, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve the staff recommendation with amendments as follows:
▪ Review the appropriateness of the 15 years’ timeline requirement for the deed restriction in Section B(3) of the Ordinance,
▪ Add language relative to clerestory windows or no windows on walls facing adjacent properties for ADUs that are located above a detached garage; and ▪ Direction to staff to continue to work with the Town Arborist to modify the tree protection zone exception process in a manner that incentivizes applicants to comply with the Town’s setback standards. (Attachment 5)
The remainder of this report supplements the October 25, 2023, staff report by addressing the Planning Commission recommendations in the context of the Town’s goal to incentivize the production of ADUs that (1) provide a lower income housing typology and (2) that comply with the Town’s existing setback standards.
ANALYSIS
The following analysis considers the total number of ADUs or Junior ADUs (JADUs) allowed on a single-family property and how that may influence the Town’s pursuit of a Bonus ADU program, standards for ADUs located above detached garages, an administrative review process for large ADUs in tree protection zones, and a discussion on fencing requirements.
Number of Units Allowed, Bonus Units and Deed Restriction Program As discussed in the October 25, 2023, staff report, the total number of ADUs allowed by State law on a single-family zoned property is three units: one JADU, one ADU (internal to the main house or through conversion of a structure) and one detached ADU. This is a shift from what many jurisdictions previously perceived as two units and has become a common error flagged in ADU Ordinances flagged by the State’s Housing and Community Development Department (HCD).
Staff is highlighting this change because it is distinct from what the Planning Commission and City Council has previously understood and may influence the Town’s decision to facilitate a “bonus” ADU through Housing Element Program 3.812(F) which seeks to allow two ADUs to be constructed on properties that are two acres, or greater, in area. This topic was discussed by the Planning Commission, which recommended retaining the bonus program given that it would apply to lots that are two acres or greater.
Past discussions of the bonus ADU program have also included a potential deed restriction component that would require the bonus unit to be affordable to low-income households for a period of 15 years or more. This program is included in the Draft Ordinance (Attachments 6 and 7) as 17.52.040(B)(3):
ADU Ordinance Update
November 15, 2023
On lots that allow single-family dwellings and are a minimum of two (2) acres, the property owner may have up to two (2) detached ADUs provided that one of the two units is deed restricted as low-income for a period of 15 years or more.
The Planning Commission considered the deed restriction program and although they ultimately voted to recommend approval of the draft ordinance, the Commission added a recommendation that the Council review the appropriateness of the 15-year timeline requirement for the deed restriction.
To facilitate this discussion, staff has provided additional information on related deed-restricted programs below.
Deed-restrictions are requirements on a property that are communicated through that property’s deed. For land use planning purposes, jurisdictions may require a property to record a restriction on the deed that relates to conditions of approval that run with the property and not the owner. This is an effective tool to ensure that all future property owners are aware of conditions of approval, restrictions or requirements associated with land use entitlements, prior to purchasing the property.
The timeframe for a deed restriction varies based on the nature of the restriction. Many jurisdictions that require affordable housing units constructed in conjunction with an inclusionary housing program are maintained at certain affordability levels (very low, low, moderate, etc) for periods ranging from 30 to 55 years. However, this timeframe is characteristic of affordable housing built as part of multifamily developments including five or more primary residences, not ADUs.
Requiring deed-restricted affordable housing through ADUs is a new approach to capturing and documenting the lower income housing options that ADUs provide. This documentation is important because it helps demonstrate to the state that the Town’s strategy to provide lower income housing through ADUs is effective. However, because this approach is new, there is no standard for a timeframe. Staff is aware of one California jurisdiction that has fully enacted a deedrestricted ADU program. The City of San Diego enacted a program in 2020 that requires a 15-year commitment for moderate-income ADUs and a 10-year commitment for very low- or low-income ADUs.
ADUs Above Detached Garages
At the May 10, 2023, study session the Councilmembers and Planning Commissioners provided feedback to incentivize compliance with the Town’s setback standards by facilitating ADUs larger than 800 square feet and enabling ADUs above detached garages. Inclusion of ADUs above detached garages is also consistent with the adopted Housing Element. However, the Housing Element indicates that the maximum height for such structures as 18 feet. Based on discussion at the May 10, 2023 study session, staff drafted the ADU Ordinance to reference a height limit to no more than 25 feet based on the following:
▪ The Town desires an ADU program that incentivizes alignment with existing setback standards for main buildings and accessory structures. Existing garages comply with these standards with the exception of unique cases for garages that are legally noncomplying. ▪ Existing garages that are compliant with the Town’s zoning ordinance have a maximum height requirement of 15 feet or one story.
▪ A general standard for the height of one story is ten feet. ▪ The allowance of an ADU above a garage, with an 18-foot height limit may deter applicants by resulting in less favorable floor to ceiling heights, preventing a preferred roofline articulation, or resulting in the loss of attic/storage space within the existing garage.
ADU Ordinance Update
November 15, 2023
Additionally, in response to concerns raised at the May 10, 2023 study session regarding the scale of a potential 1,200 square foot above a larger multi-car garage characteristic to the Town, staff also recommended the following set of objective development standards for such a proposal:
▪ The total height is inclusive of the garage,
▪ The garage complies with the accessory structure setback requirements of the Zoning Code ▪ The ADU is accessed through a ground level entry vestibule and an interior stair. ▪ The roofline shall be consistent with the style of the main residence. For example, a gabled roof form on the main residence shall require a gabled roof form on the ADU above garage. ▪ If the second story floor area accommodating the ADU is less than the ground floor area, the residual roofing above the ground floor shall not accommodate a roof deck or balcony.
The Planning Commission discussed the 25-foot height limit, noting that an ADU attached to the primary residence and above a garage would also have a height limit of 25-feet, as required by state law. The Planning Commission also modified staff’s recommendation to add two design techniques intended to preserve privacy: the use of clerestory windows and the absence of any windows on facades facing adjacent properties. This language has been added to 17.52.040(J)(1):
New ADUs constructed above the ground floor shall also be designed to reasonably preserve the privacy of adjacent property owners. Appropriate design techniques to preserve privacy include obscured glazing, the use of clerestory windows that are above eye level, screening treatments, locating windows toward the existing on-site residence or providing no windows on facades facing adjacent properties.
The Planning Commission also discussed the implications of the fencing requirements in the draft ADU Ordinance, which requires the following per section 17.52.040(J)(3):
A solid 8-foot-high fence shall be provided along the entire front, side, or rear property line adjacent to where the ADU is located. Fences shall be at the property line.
Although the Planning Commission did not make changes to this language, staff is calling attention to the requirement for the Council’s consideration as the direction on this point was not solidified at the May 10, 2023 study session and it reflects a general change to fence height requirements in the Town where 6-feet, with some exceptions, is the requirement on side and rear property lines and where there is no requirement at the front property line. Further, one concern repeated at both the study session and the Planning Commission meeting is the actual benefit achieved for privacy or screening when State law facilitates a 16-foot tall detached ADU four feet from the side and rear property lines and zero feet from the front property line.
Heritage Trees
In response to the Town’s desire to incentivize ADUs that comply with the Town’s setback standards.
Planning staff and the Town Arborist recommended language to Planning Commission that enabled detached ADUs greater than 800 square feet to seek an administrative exception to the Tree Protection Zone (TPZ) requirements for a distance up to 8x in the R1-A zoning district. The Town Arborist would review such requests for ADUs concurrently with review by Planning staff. The Planning Commission supported this effort; however, they directed staff to modify the tree protection zone exception process in a manner that further incentivizes applicants to comply with the Town’s setback standards.
In response to the Planning Commission, staff has modified Section 17.52.040(I)(2) to facilitate administrative review of TPZ requests for a distance up to 6x. However, the Town Arborist would
ADU Ordinance Update
November 15, 2023
request specific information as part of an application submittal process to facilitate that review. The required information and terms of this process in the application would note the following:
1. An application and fee are required to be completed prior to a Town Arborist TPZ exception review. Submitting and paying for the application does not guarantee approval to reduce the TPZ. If the Town Arborist denies an application submitted for a Town Arborist exception to the TPZ, the application can be appealed to the Planning Commission in accordance with the Atherton Municipal Code. The application for a Town Arborist TPZ exception shall be submitted to the Town of Atherton with a narrative stating why the exception is requested, what the impact to any Heritage trees would be, why alternate locations do not work and any identified mitigation. The following information shall accompany the application and application fee:
a. A plan showing location of the structure and the Heritage trees with size and species stated. Show TPZ zones from 5x to 10x on the plan.
b. Project Arborist report – stating what the damage and mitigation would be. c. Any Trenching less than 10x the dbh is required to be hand dug including exploratory Trenching if approved to trench closer than 10x.
d. The percentage of Heritage tree roots to be cut.
e. Site plan showing alternative locations.
f. Any utility easements.
g. Any supporting letters from Menlo Fire, PG&E and/or other utility providers. h. The Town Arborist can require a meeting at site or with all parties to discuss further. i. The Town Arborist can request any further information as needed to review.
2. Any application to be submitted shall be reviewed by the Town Arborist for demonstrated compliance with any the following criteria, to the satisfaction of the Town Arborist:
a. If the species is tolerant of construction based on species, health, size and age from Matheny and Clark tolerance chart.
b. Health of the tree.
c. Are their alternative locations for an ADU on site.
d. There are no roots over 2” diameter that need to be cut. e. Percentage of the roots disturbed and foundation type. f. Other criteria as may be required by the Town Arborist.
3. Appeal to the Planning Commission. Decisions of the Town Arborist may be appealed to the Planning Commission by filing the following:
a. A completed appeal form along with payment of the appeal fee deposit. b. A copy of the original application submitted to the Town Arborist. c. A copy of the decision made by the Town Arborist.
d. Any new information not considered by the Town Arborist. e. The Planning Commission shall consider the criteria set forth above in Section 2.2 B in ruling on the outcome of any appeal of a decision of the Town Arborist.
FINDINGS:
ADU Ordinance Update
November 15, 2023
The proposed zoning text amendments are consistent with the General Plan goals, policies, and implementation programs. The proposed Zoning Ordinance amendments allow the Town to be compliant with recent changes in state law related to the development of Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units (JADUs). Amendments proposed address the following General Plan Goal, Objectives, and Policy:
Housing Element Goal 3.720 Use Accessory Dwelling Units to meet a substantial portion of the Town’s moderate to very low-income
housing need.
Housing Element Objective 3.721 A. Realize the construction of 280 new accessory dwelling units planned for occupancy by moderate to
extremely low-income households in Atherton from
2023-2031.
Housing Element Policy 3.722 A. Actively promote the Accessory Dwelling Unit provision of the Atherton Zoning Ordinance by
encouraging homeowners and developers to include
attached or detached Accessory Dwelling Units in
existing or new homes.
B. Comprehensively update the Town’s Accessory
Dwelling Unit (ADU) Ordinance to amend any identified
zoning development standards which may unduly
constrain development of ADUs.
Housing Element Policy 3.762 B. The Town shall continue to encourage the production and availability of more affordable housing through the development of new accessory dwelling units, and
private and public-school faculty and student housing.
CONCLUSION:
To respond to the current state housing crisis, the state passed a series of bills designed to encourage the production of both ADUs and JADUs. Cities are expected to update their local ordinances to comply with the state legislation. If the Town fails to conform its local ordinance, applicants would be permitted to develop under the state legislation. Since the Town currently has several ADU applications pending, adopting the local updates will allow the Town to process applications with more clarity and compliance. The attached ordinance is drafted to comply with the minimum, more permissive state regulations. Additionally, adoption of amendments to the ADU Ordinance to incorporate the more permissive state requirements, may further promote the development of ADUs in Town, which may in turn assist the Town fulfilling its Regional Housing Needs Allocations (RHNA) requirements for the adopted 6th Cycle Housing Element.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS
ADU Ordinance Update
November 15, 2023
The project is Categorically Exemption per Section 15305 of the CEQA Guidelines. Section 15305 relates to Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations, as the ordinance amendments would not result in any changes to land use or density.
FISCAL IMPACT
The cost associated with the preparation of the draft Ordinance amendments are included within the annual Planning Department budget. The cost to implement the Ordinance will be paid for the applicants of related development projects.
PUBLIC NOTICE
Public notification was achieved by posting the agenda, with this agenda item being listed, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting in print and electronically. Legal advertisement of this hearing was published in The Alamanac newspaper. Notice of this hearing was also mailed to all property owners within the Town. Information about the project is also disseminated via the Town’s electronic News Flash and Atherton Online. There are approximately 1,200 subscribers to the Town’s electronic News Flash publications. Subscribers include residents as well as stakeholders – to include, but be not limited to, media outlets, school districts, Menlo Park Fire District, service provides (water, power, and sewer), and regional elected officials.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Joint City Council & Planning Commission Study Session - May 10, 2023 Staff Report (Link)
2. Study Session Questions to Staff & Answers
3. Recording of May 10, 2023 Study Session (Link)
4. Planning Commission Meeting – October 23, 2023 Staff Report (Link)
5. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2023-01
6. Draft ADU Ordinance (Changes shown in red)
7. Draft ADU Ordinance (Tracked changes)
Attachment 2
1. What is the maximum size of an ADU that we should allow? Should we require 2 bedrooms if the ADU is over a certain size? Should we allow exemption for the full sq footage of an ADU, not just 800 sq ft?
65852.2. (a)(1)(D)(v) The total floor area for a detached accessory dwelling unit shall not exceed 1,200 square feet.
The Town cannot have bedroom requirements for an ADU 800 sq. ft. or less. The Town can have limited bedroom requirements; however, the Town cannot mandate the number of bedrooms. 65852.2. (c)(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), a local agency shall not establish by ordinance any of the following:
(A) A minimum square footage requirement for either an attached or detached accessory dwelling unit that prohibits an efficiency unit.
(B) A maximum square footage requirement for either an attached or detached accessory dwelling unit that is less than either of the following:
(i) 850 square feet.
(ii) 1,000 square feet for an accessory dwelling unit that provides more than one bedroom.
2. If we allow 2 ADUs on a 2+ acre parcel, should we require a deed restriction on the second, in addition to requiring compliance w Atherton setbacks.
The Town can allow for an additional ADU. Any deed restriction should be more than 8 years (recommend 16 years) otherwise the Town will have to deal with at-risk units during the next housing element cycle. The Town would have to replace every housing unit that falls off a deed restriction. Typically, affordable housing projects are deed restricted for 55 years.
Deed restrictions may be difficult to enforce because of the staff time required to monitor compliance and the changes in parties involved over the decades can lead to protracted disputes over compliance.
3. Should we require 8 ft fencing if the setback for any building is less than 10ft? The Town can require a fence for ADUs; however, it would have to be completely ministerial and be based on objective criteria. Imposing a different fence height requirement for ADUs than we generally require would also need to be based on some articulated reason to avoid claims that the extra obligation arbitrarily singles out ADUs (e.g., ADUs with a 4 ft. setback must have a 7 ft. fence to provide privacy screening because this amount of setback does not provide space for landscape screening)
4. Should we enable removal of non-oak heritage trees for any ADU, not just 800 sq ft? Can we do anything to protect oaks from removal for 800 sq ft ADU? Allowing the removal of non-oak heritage trees for any ADU is a policy call. There is no mechanism available that would allow the Town to protect oaks from removal for 800 sf or less ADUs.
65852.2(a)(7) No other local ordinance, policy, or regulation shall be the basis for the delay or denial of a building permit or a use permit under this Subdivision.
2 5. Should we eliminate the site heritage tree inventory for an ADU permit? Are there other tree related items that we can change to make the ADU process less expensive and less cumbersome?
The Council/Commission may wish to consider this. Because tree protection remains an important issue, the Town may wish to consider a radius approach for ADUs as opposed to a full-site inventory requirement.
6. Should we remove any arborist fee, as well as the planning fees, for ADU permits? Are there other fees that we can remove or reduce? Can we cap the total building fee for an ADU build (without a SFR) or conversion?
Staff suggests waiving Planning Fees only. The Council can approve a capped or reduced building permit. However, in staff’s experience, Town fees are not the hurdle to the construction of ADUs.
7. Can we remove reference to ovens in the kitchen definition? How can we simplify the definitions and give more discretion to property owners? Staff proposes to maintain efficiency kitchen definition based on State law. All others - State definition plus “for example”.
65852.22(a)(6) for JADUs and 65852.2(j) for ADUs.
8. Where should the ADU entrance be? How does that change if above a car facility? The Council/Commission may wish to consider requiring entrances to be located away from neighboring property owners, where feasible. The Council/Commission may wish to consider requiring entrances to be on the ground floor for ADUs above garage or carport to prevent second floor balconies overlooking adjacent properties.
9. Should we give planning discretion re: ADU sizing above a garage or carport? Staff recommends that ADUs be ministerial and based on objective code criteria.
10. Should we reduce the side setback from 35 ft (?) to 25 ft if a JADU takes up the space? JADUs must remain in the main building footprint. AMC allows for a 20% incursion into the side setback for attached ADUs. An attached 800 sq. ft. ADU can be 4 ft. from the site property line.
An ADU above 800 sq. ft. can encroach 20% into the side yard, per AMC. 65852.22(a)(4) Require a permitted junior accessory dwelling unit to be constructed within the walls of the proposed or existing single-family residence. For purposes of this paragraph, enclosed uses within the residence, such as attached garages, are considered a part of the proposed or existing single-family residence.
11. What TPZ changes make sense to encourage ADU development. Modify ordinance to eliminate different TPZ for R-1A vs R-1B.
3 TOWN Heritage Tree Preservation Standards and Specifications The TPZ shall be determined the following way: the TPZ radius shall be 10 times the DBH (4.5’) of the trunk. For example: a 15” DBH = a 12.5-foot radius from the perimeter of the Heritage tree, or a 25-foot TPZ. Any deviation in determining the TPZ shall be in accordance with ANSI standards subject to approval by the Town Arborist.
1. R1-A Zoning District for lots of more than 10,000 square feet:
a. The TPZ is 10x away from all buildings and structures. b. The TPZ is 8x away from any new driveway.
2. R1-B Zoning District and lots in the R1-A Zoning District that are 10,000 square feet or less:
a. The TPZ is 6x away from all buildings, structures, and new driveways.
3. For all lots:
a. The TPZ is 6x away from all CMU walls and 5x away from all wood or metal fences that require a permit.
b. The TPZ is 3x from all landscaping, Landscape Screening trees and bushes. c. For replacement of existing driveways and/or new, proposed compacted surfaces, allow for replacement in the existing location, but in no cases less than 3 times (3x) The Council can modify the preceding as deemed appropriate.
12. Eliminate requirement that plans be submitted in physical form as well as online.
Planning does not need physical plans except for Subdivisions. Most building permit submittals allow for online submittal, but some require physical plans. Building currently utilizes paper stamped copies at building permit issuance but is working to go completely digital.
13. Make the application process user friendly. Eliminate the monthly arborist report. It should be quarterly, and no filing required if there is no change.
This will have a field impact, reduced arborist review of properties. This is a policy call.
14. Can we create a list of specific criteria for over garage ADUs (external staircase rules, windows overlooking neighboring properties, etc
For ADUs under 800 sq. ft. our ability to provide regulations are limited. Staff is looking into ADUs over 800 sq. ft. Whatever criteria created, it will need to be objective and ministerial. See also, comment to Question 8 regarding ground floor entrances.
15. How big an over garage ADU will we allow? I think only 3 car garage. What about the 6-car garage? Allow any ADU over the existing garage grandfathered? The Council/Commission may want to limit of the size of the ADU (over the garage/carport) to be limited to the size of the garage/carport plus a ground floor entry, up to 1,200 sq. ft. The Council/Commission may want to discuss whether a 1,200 sq. ft. ADU above a garage/carport is too large (approximately 35 ft by 34 ft.)
If there is an ADU over a garage/carport, it must be allowed to continue.
4 65852.2. (d)(2) The local agency shall not deny an application for a permit to create an accessory dwelling unit due to the correction of nonconforming zoning conditions, building code violations, or unpermitted structures that do not present a threat to public health and safety and are not affected by the construction of the accessory dwelling unit.
16. Can we discuss fence height requirements in the 4‘ADU scenario. What is the highest? 8 Feet 10 feet? 12 feet? What is the highest that doesn't look bad? Any fence requirement should be ministerial. The Council/Commission may want to consider how tall a fence is appropriate. Per building code, any fence over 7 ft. requires engineering.
17. What screening plant requirements will we have for 4’ and 10’? Are they different? In 4 feet can you actually plant things? Is it too close to the foundation for tall trees? The 4-foot setback presents a challenge with egress for fire safety when landscaping is added.
There is more flexibility with egress and landscaping with a 10-foot setback. Future fire codes may discourage landscaping near structures.
18. Do we need a pool house exception for an ADU. Wouldn't it be the same as any other? Same.
19. New foundation technology allows us to plant trees closer. Can we ask an arborist about this? Is there some definitive criteria we can put so we don't have to have an arborist weigh in on every project?
Staff does not recommend outlining specific technology. This may become a discretionary process.
Staff recommends that there be an exception review permit process created to allow for review of proposed foundations.
20. A few people asked about tax costs and a blanket tax agreement. Is this possible or feasible?
The Town cannot do this.
21. Do we still have a dishwasher requirement or did that get taken out? Staff proposes to use State definitions, which do not outline a requirement for a dishwasher. 65852.22(a)(6) for JADUs. Government Code Section 65852.2(j) for ADUs.
22. What is the front setback for a greater than 800-foot ADU? 120 ft, or 30 ft behind from line of main structure (detached accessory structures)
5 23. Do we have rules for ADU hard scape? Are they allowed a porch, walkway? Is it calculated based on the existing hardscape? If maxed out on hardscape, can we allow just a minimum walkway?
We do not have specific hardscape rules for ADUs. We only have lot coverage limitations in POS and PFS. All parts of the ADU would need to meet setbacks.
24. Where did we end up on the rules around the entry to ADU? It originally said it has to face interior of the lot, we discussed allowing it to face the street and allowing it to be any side. Is it the same rules if it is 4’ or 10” between neighbor property? The Council/Commission may want to discuss this.
25. Do we call out any rules on prefab or is it the same? Prefab units would not have different regulations.
26. I was not clear where we ended up on subdividing the utilities.
Per Code and State law.
27. Where did we end up on the owner occupancy after 2025? Per State law.
28. Is there anything we can do about ADU on the front of the property if under 800? This looks so bad.
No.
29. Can the Town charge premium fees for ADU’s with four foot setbacks? No.
30. Where are we on gas for ADU’s now?
Electric ready only. Gas is ok.
31. There are areas of town zoned R1A that should be zoned R1B. I don’t know all the differences yet, but does that play into the ADU discussion? No. Land use and zoning designations are not solely lot-size based, they are part of the Town’s General Plan and dictate a long-term plan for Town development. This is a discussion better suited to a General Plan Review process.
6 32. Can we eliminate TPZ issues entirely when an ADU (or other structures too) is built on a slab?
Possibly. See above question.
33. What can we do to encourage architectural style and finish that match the rest of the property?
Nothing on 800 sf or less; but the Town does have discretion to address objective and ministerial criteria on larger ADUs.
34. Does the ADU require direct driveway access? Ie, can access and parking be located elsewhere on the property?
Direct driveway access is not required. Parking can be on the property.
35. Parking requirements ...can we require more available on-site parking for over 800 sq. ft. ADU's? Property-front parking standards (is it allowed/required for JDU/ADU combo's?)
65852.2. x)(I) Parking requirements for accessory dwelling units shall not exceed one parking space per accessory dwelling unit or per bedroom, whichever is less. These spaces may be provided as tandem parking on a driveway.
36. Drainage requirements ... preventing on-site and off-site rainwater drainage issues caused by additional roofs/hardscape.
Not a zoning issue per se.
37. Addressing Neighbor Privacy concerns... plant screening/ window placement standards (no windows on neighbor side of 4' setbacks units or garage-top/carport-top units?)
The Town has limited ability to regulate 800 sq. ft. ADUs up to 16 ft. high. The Town may be able have more regulations for ADUs over garages/carports (over 16 ft. high) 65852.2(c)(2)(D)…shall not establish by ordinance any of the following…any height limitation that does not allow at least the following…a height of 16 feet for a detached accessory dwelling unit on a lot with an existing or proposed single family or multifamily dwelling unit [or] a height of 18 feet for a detached accessory dwelling unit on a lot with an existing or proposed single family or multifamily dwelling unit that is within one-half of one mile walking distance of a major transit stop or a high-quality transit corridor as those terms are defined [or] a height of 25 feet or the height limitation in the local zoning ordinance that applies to the primary dwelling, whichever is lower, for an accessory dwelling unit that is attached to a primary dwelling.…
38. Determine fee standards... would a 2-year ADU/JDU fee waiver/fee reduction jumpstart unit production to help meet housing plan targets? The Council/Commission may want to discuss this. State compliance is not solely a matter of production.
7 39. Clarify access options (can a unit be faced on another street and address on that street?)
The Fire District would like ADU the address to be on the same street as the main residence.
40. Clarify kitchen standards for greater than 800 sq. ft. ADU's (if any).
Staff proposes to limit the kitchen definition to the State Requirements. 65852.22(a)(6) for JADUs. Government Code Section 65852.2(j) for ADUs.
41. Why no basement ADU's JDU's? seems as if that could reduce neighbor impact issues and access safety could be addressed.
Basements are already exempt from floor area.
42. Why wouldn't we be encouraging lot splits even more than ADU's... it seems as if that results in a more 'normal' 'neighborhood' design.
The Council/Commission may want to discuss this. The Town already encourages/supports SB9 Urban Lot Splits.
43. If we HAD to have multi-unit...where would we want it? This will be discussed as part of the Housing Element.
Attachment 5
1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2023-001
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF
ATHERTON TO RECOMMEND CHANGES TO THE ATHERTON MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTERS 17.52, 17.36 AND 17.60.
WHEREAS, the State of California passed AB 2221 and AB 2097 that necessitates updates to the Accessory Dwelling Unit regulations; and WHEREAS, the Town of Atherton seeks to remain in compliance with State Regulations; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Atherton encourages the development of accessory dwelling units to produce housing; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider revisions to Chapter 17.52 accessory dwelling units, Chapter
17.36 Public Facilities and Schools District (PFS) and Chapter 17.60 definitions of the Atherton Municipal Code at the regular October 25, 2023 meeting to conform to state requirements; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, received public comment, and discussed elements of the Accessory Dwelling Unit Regulations; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that revisions to Chapters 17.52,
17.36, and 17.60 are in conformance with the General Plan, particularly the following Goal, Objectives, and Policy:
Housing Element Goal 3.720 Use Accessory Dwelling Units to meet a substantial portion of the Town’s moderate to very
low-income housing need.
Housing Element Objective 3.721 A. Realize the construction of 280 new accessory dwelling units planned for occupancy by moderate
to extremely low-income households in Atherton
from 2023-2031.
Housing Element Policy 3.722 A. Actively promote the Accessory Dwelling Unit provision of the Atherton Zoning Ordinance by
encouraging homeowners and developers to
include attached or detached Accessory Dwelling
Units in existing or new homes.
B. Comprehensively update the Town’s Accessory
Dwelling Unit (ADU) Ordinance to amend any
identified zoning development standards which
may unduly constrain development of ADUs.
Attachment 5
2 Housing Element Policy 3.762 B. The Town shall continue to encourage the production and availability of more affordable
housing through the development of new
accessory dwelling units, and private and publicschool faculty and student housing.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of the City of Atherton in its independent judgment and based on substantial evidence in the record, hereby recommends to the City Council:
1. That the revisions to the ADU regulations are exempt from CEQA under Section 15305
2. To adopt revisions to the Chapters 17.52, 17.36, and 17.60 to conform to state regulations and with the following direction to staff:
a. review the appropriateness of the 15 years’ timeline requirement for the deed restriction in Section B(3) of the Ordinance;
b. add language relative to clerestory windows or no windows on walls facing adjacent properties for ADUs that are located above a detached garage; and,
c. continue to work with the Town Arborist to modify the tree protection zone exception process in a manner that incentivizes applicants to comply with the Town's setback standards.
********************
Passed and adopted as a Resolution of the Planning Commission of the Town of Atherton at a regular meeting thereof held on the October 25, 2023 by the following vote:
AYES, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Bryan, Lane Lerner, Polito, and Tonelli NOES, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None
CHAIR of the Planning Commission
ATTEST:
TOWN PLANNER of the Town of Atherton
Attachment 7
Ordinance ______ Page 1 of 16 Date
DRAFT ORDINANCE _____
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ATHERTON TO REPEAL AND REPLACE CHAPTER 17.52 AND AMEND CHAPTERS 17.36 AND
17.60 OF THE ATHERTON MUNCIPAL CODE REGULATING ACCESSORY
DWELLING UNITS AND JUNIOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS
WHEREAS, the Town of Atherton has historically regulated the construction of accessory structures within zones designated for residential use in a manner that is consistent with the character of the Town and that values the privacy of the Town’s residents, and
WHEREAS, California has a shortage of housing and particularly affordable housing and the State Legislature has in recent years undertaken a number of measures to incentivize the construction of additional housing stock to address this shortage, and WHEREAS, the City Council supports the construction of additional housing stock throughout the state but strongly opposes the State Legislature’s approach to incentivizing such construction where that approach usurps local land use control, and WHEREAS, the City Council opposes the changes in state law that take away local land use control over the development of accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units, and makes conforming changes to the Atherton Municipal Code under protest.
The City Council of the Town of Atherton does hereby ordain as follows:
Section 1. TITLE
This Ordinance shall be known as the Town of Atherton ("Town") Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance. This Ordinance shall be applicable in the incorporated territory of the Town.
Section 2. PURPOSE & AUTHORITY
The purpose of this Ordinance is to adopt regulations governing the development of accessory dwelling units ("ADUs") and junior accessory dwelling units ("JADUs]") in accordance with the changes made to State ADU laws found at Government Code section 65852 et seq. by various Senate and Assembly Bills, including SB 13, AB 68, and AB 881.
Section 3. AMENDMENTS TO ATHERTON MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER
17.52 Chapter 17.52 is hereby deleted and re-enacted to read as follows:
Attachment 7
Ordinance ______ Page 2 of 16 Date
Chapter 17.52
ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS
Sections:
17.52.010 Purpose.
17.52.020 Zones Allowed.
17.52.030 Definitions.
17.52.040 Development Standards and General Requirements.
17.52.050 Application Review.
17.52.010 Purpose.
The purpose of this chapter is to regulate accessory dwelling units in residential zoning districts and on residential property consistent with state law (California Government Code Section 65852 et seq.). Implementation of this chapter is intended to provide for additional housing opportunities by increasing the number of units available within existing neighborhoods while maintaining the character of the area. The City Council of the Town of Atherton adopts this chapter to comply with SB 13, AB 68, AB 881, AB 2221, and AB 2097 under protest, as it is the Council’s position that in enacting these laws, the legislature has improperly usurped local land use authority.
17.52.020 Zones Allowed.
Junior accessory dwelling units shall be allowed in all areas zoned to allow single-family residential and accessory dwelling units shall be allowed in all areas zoned to allow singlefamily residential and multifamily residential uses in compliance with the development standards set forth in section 17.52.040 (Development Standards and General Requirements) of this Chapter.
17.52.030 Definitions.
A. “Accessory dwelling unit” or “ADU” means a building or portion of a building designed for use and occupancy by people living independently of the occupants of the main residence building. The ADU shall be on the same lot as the main residence. An ADU can be an attached or a detached residential dwelling unit that provides complete independent living facilities for one or more persons and is located on a lot with a proposed or existing single-family or multifamily development. It shall include permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking, and sanitation. An accessory dwelling unit also includes the following:
1. An efficiency unit.
2. A manufactured home, as defined in Section 18007 of the Health and Safety Code.
Attachment 7
Ordinance ______ Page 3 of 16 Date
B. “Attached accessory dwelling unit” means a newly constructed unit that is connected to the primary single-family home by at least one wall.
C. “Detached accessory dwelling unit” means an accessory dwelling unit that is not structurally attached to the main residence.
D. “Efficiency unit” means a living unit which includes all the following:
• Size of at least 150 square feet.
• For units that are not accessible or adaptable, a partial kitchen with a sink (minimum 18 inches wide), a permanently installed two or more burner cooktop and oven, hood vent, and refrigerator (minimum 10 cubic feet), each having a clear working space of not less than 30 inches in front of the counter. o Food preparation counter or counters that total at least 20 square feet. o Storage cabinets that total at least 30 cubic feet of shelf space o A separate closet.
• Compliance with light and ventilation requirements of the Atherton Building Code. • A separate bathroom containing a water closet (toilet), lavatory (bathroom sink) and bathtub and/or shower.
E. “Junior Accessory dwelling unit” or “JADU” means a unit that is no more than 500 square feet in size and contained entirely within a single-family residence. A junior accessory dwelling unit shall include an efficiency kitchen, which shall include all of the following: a cooking facility with appliances and a food preparation counter and storage cabinets that are of reasonable size in relation to the size of the junior accessory dwelling unit. A junior accessory dwelling unit may include separate sanitation facilities or may share sanitation facilities with the existing structure.
F. “Living area” for the purpose of this chapter, means the interior habitable area of a dwelling unit, including basements and attics, but does not include a garage or any accessory structure.
G. “Public transit” means a location, including, but not limited to, a bus stop or train station, where the public may access buses, trains, subways, and other forms of transportation that charge set fares, run on fixed routes, and are available to the public. Pursuant to Section 21155 of the Public Resources Code
17.52.040 Development Standards and General Requirements.
Unless otherwise stated in Section 17.52.050 of this Ordinance, ADUs and JADUs are permitted, provided the following standards and requirements are incorporated and met.
A. Accessory Dwelling Use. All ADUs and JADUs shall be located on the same lot with an existing or proposed dwelling and considered an accessory residential use to the primary residence. ADUs and JADUs do not count towards the allowable density for the lot upon which it is located.
Attachment 7
Ordinance ______ Page 4 of 16 Date
B. Maximum Number of ADUs and JADUs per lot.
1. One ADU and one JADU per lot with a proposed or existing single-family dwelling if all of the following apply:
a. The ADU or JADU is within the proposed space of a single-family dwelling, existing space of a single-family dwelling or in an accessory structure. The ADU may include an expansion of not more than 150 square feet beyond the same physical dimensions as an existing accessory structure. An expansion beyond the physical dimensions of an existing accessory structure shall be limited to accommodating ingress and egress. b. The space has exterior access separate from the proposed or existing single-family dwelling.
c. The side and rear setbacks are sufficient for fire and safety. d. The JADU complies with the requirements of Section 65852.22.
2. One detached, new construction, ADU that does not exceed 800 square-feet, complies with the height restrictions in this section, and provides a minimum of four-foot side and rear yard setbacks for a lot with a proposed or existing single-family dwelling. The accessory dwelling unit may be combined with a JADU.
3. On lots that allow single-family dwellings and are a minimum of two (2) acres, the property owner may have up to two (2) detached ADUs provided that one of the two units is deed restricted as low-income for a period of 15 years or more.
4. Lots that allow multifamily dwellings.
a. Multiple accessory dwelling units are allowed within the portions of existing multifamily dwelling structures that are not used as livable space, including, but not limited to, storage rooms, boiler rooms, passageways, attics, basements, or garages, if each unit complies with state building standards for dwellings.
b. At least one ADU is allowed within an existing multifamily dwelling. The total number of ADUs allowed is up to 25 percent of the existing multifamily dwelling units.
c. Not more than two ADUs that are located on a lot that has an existing or proposed multifamily dwelling, but are detached from that multifamily dwelling and are subject to applicable height limits and a four-foot rear and side setbacks.
i. If an existing multifamily dwelling has a rear or side setback of less than four feet, no modification of the existing multifamily dwelling is required as a condition of approving an ADU.
Attachment 7
Ordinance ______ Page 5 of 16 Date
C. Floor Area Requirements.
1. No ADU or JADU may be smaller than the size required to allow an efficiency unit pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 17958.1, which is 150 square feet. The maximum size of an efficiency unit is 500 square feet.
2. The maximum size for a JADU is 500 square feet.
3. The maximum size for an ADU is 1,200 square feet.
4. The floor area of an attached ADU shall not exceed fifty percent of the existing floor area of the main residence, unless necessary to accommodate at least an 800 square foot ADU.
5. Garage and accessory structures ancillary to an ADU are not considered part of the ADU living area and are not included in the ADU floor area calculations.
D. Exemptions from Maximum Floor Area Limitations.
1. The first 800 square feet of floor area of each ADU, attached and detached, and up to five hundred square feet for each JADU shall be excluded from maximum floor area calculations.
2. Additional floor area for each ADU may be excluded from maximum floor area calculations where staff determines the following conditions are met:
a. If a detached ADU meets and/or exceeds the minimum side and rear setbacks of Chapter 17.40 Accessory Buildings and Structures, then the ADU will be allowed an additional floor area exemption beyond the first 800 square feet of floor area, up to a total of 1,200 square feet. b. If an attached ADU is located in the main buildable area and encroaches into the side and rear yard setbacks by not more than twenty percent (20%) of the required setback, then the ADU shall be allowed an additional floor area exemption beyond the first 800 square feet of floor area, up to a total of twelve 1,200 square feet.
3. No floor area limitation shall be required for any conversion of an existing legal non-conforming building to an ADU.
4. Interior stairs are exempt from floor area calculations if the stairs accommodate access to a new ADU located above an existing or proposed detached garage that complies with accessory structure setback requirements.
E. Basements.
1. Habitable basements are allowed under detached ADUs; however, these basements shall count toward the floor area of the ADU. An internal connection from the ADU to the habitable basement is required. No special structures permit is required for these basements.
Attachment 7
Ordinance ______ Page 6 of 16 Date
2. Habitable basements are allowed under attached ADUs; however, these basements shall count toward the floor area of the ADU if located outside the main building area setback. An internal connection from the ADU to the habitable basement is required.
3. Habitable basements are allowed under a JADU; however, these basements will be considered as the basement for the main residence and will not count toward the square footage of the JADU. No internal connection from the JADU will be allowed into the basement. Basements accommodating JADUs must be within the main building area.
4. Non-habitable basements under ADUs are only allowed outside the accessory structure setback and are subject to the Heritage Tree Ordinance. Exterior access to the non-habitable basement shall be located outside the accessory structure setback.
5. The floor area of an attached ADU or JADU does not count toward the basement allowance under 17.44.030.A.
F. Setback Requirements. Except as specified below, all ADUs and JADUs shall comply with the setback requirements of the zone in which a unit is to be located.
1. JADUs shall have the same setbacks as required for the main residence.
2. A newly constructed detached or attached ADU that is 800 square feet or less must be located at least 4 feet from a side or rear property line. This type of ADU does not have a front yard setback.
a. No decks or mechanical equipment are allowed in the four-foot side and rear setback.
3. A newly constructed attached ADU that has a floor area greater than 800 square feet and no more than 1,200 square feet shall be located in the main building area. These ADUs may encroach into side and rear yard setbacks by not more than twenty percent (20%) of the required setback.
4. A newly constructed detached ADU that has a floor area greater than 800 square feet and no more than 1,200 square feet shall be located maintain the setbacks for accessory buildings.
5. A newly constructed detached ADU shall maintain the required separation distances between the proposed or existing main residence, accessory buildings and accessory structures as required in the accessory structures section of the zoning code, unless necessary to accommodate an ADU of 800 square feet ADU or less.
6. Existing Structure. No setback shall be required for an existing living area or accessory structure or a structure constructed in the same location and to the same dimensions as an existing structure that is converted to an ADU or to a portion of an ADU. A setback of at least four feet from the side and rear lot lines
Attachment 7
Ordinance ______ Page 7 of 16 Date
is required for an accessory dwelling unit that is not converted from an existing structure or a new structure constructed in the same location and to the same dimensions as an existing structure.
7. For double frontage and corner lots, the front yard is the yard that is adjacent to the designated front property. The rear yard shall be the yard adjacent to the property line on the opposite side of the property from the designated front property line. The address for the ADU shall be on the street adjacent to the front yard.
G. Entrance Requirements. Any new attached ADU or JADU that is incorporated into a proposed or existing primary residence shall have a separate entrance facing the side or rear yard, where feasible. Any new detached ADU shall have a separate entrance facing towards the interior of the lot.
H. Height.
1. A maximum height of 16 feet is allowed for a detached ADU on a lot with an existing or proposed single-family or multifamily dwelling.
2. A maximum height of 18 feet is allowed for a detached accessory dwelling unit on a lot with an existing or proposed single-family or multifamily dwelling unit that is within one-half of one mile walking distance of a major transit stop or a high-quality transit corridor. An additional two feet in height to accommodate a roof pitch on the accessory dwelling unit that is aligned with the roof pitch of the primary dwelling unit is also allowed.
3. A maximum height of 18 feet for a detached accessory dwelling unit on a lot with an existing or proposed multifamily, multistory dwelling.
4. A maximum height of 25 feet or the allowed height of the zoning district, whichever is lower, is allowed for an accessory dwelling unit that is attached to a primary dwelling.
5. Accessory dwelling units are limited to 2 stories.
6. A maximum height of 25 feet is allowed for a detached ADU located above a garage, provided that:
a. The total height is inclusive of the garage,
b. The garage complies with the accessory structure setback requirements of the Zoning Code, and,
c. The ADU is accessed through a ground level entry vestibule and an interior stair.
d. The roofline shall be consistent with the style of the main residence. For example, a gabled roof form on the main residence shall require a gabled roof form on the ADU above garage.
Attachment 7
Ordinance ______ Page 8 of 16 Date
e. If the second story floor area accommodating the ADU is less than the ground floor area, the residual roofing above the ground floor shall not accommodate a roof deck or balcony.
I. Heritage Tree Ordinance.
1. The Heritage Tree Ordinance does not apply to ADUs up to 800 square feet and JADUs up to 500 square feet. In all other cases, the Heritage Tree Ordinance applies. The main residence and all other accessory buildings/structures are subject to the Heritage Tree Ordinance.
2. Detached ADUs that are greater than 800 square feet may seek administrative exceptions to the Tree Protection Zone for a distance up to 6x in the R1-A zoning district. The Town Arborist will review such requests for ADUs, concurrently with review by Planning staff.
3. Any tree removal permitted by the Town in relation to the construction of an ADU must occur after the issuance of a related building permit. Such building permit must then adhere to time limits set forth in Atherton Municipal Code (AMC) Section 15.40.180. Penalties and remedies pursuant to AMC
8.10.070(B) may result in cases where trees are removed in relation to the approval of an ADU and the ADU is not constructed.
J. Privacy, Screening and Landscaping.
1. New ADUs constructed above the ground floor shall also be designed to reasonably preserve the privacy of adjacent property owners. Appropriate design techniques to preserve privacy include obscured glazing, the use of clerestory windows that are above eye level, screening treatments, locating windows toward the existing on-site residence, or providing no windows on facades facing adjacent properties.
2. Landscape screening for the ADU shall be installed to the greatest extent feasible.
3. A solid 8 foot high fence shall be provided along the entire front, side, or rear property line adjacent to where the ADU is located. Fences shall be at the property line.
4. No sidewall height limitations apply to ADUs.
K. Lighting Restrictions. Any lighting associated with an ADU or JADU shall be shielded or downlit and shall not shine onto adjoining properties, while meeting the minimum Building Code.
L. Parking Requirements.
1. No parking is required for a JADU.
Attachment 7
Ordinance ______ Page 9 of 16 Date
2. Unless subject to one of the exceptions immediately below, each ADU shall have assigned to it one parking space per ADU. These spaces may be provided as tandem parking on an existing driveway.
3. No additional parking shall be required if one of the following conditions applies to the ADU:
a. The ADU is located within one-half mile walking distance of public transit. b. The ADU is located within an architecturally and historically significant district.
c. The ADU is part of a proposed or existing primary residence or an existing accessory structure.
d. On-street parking permits are required but not offered to the occupant of the ADU.
e. A car share vehicle is located within one block of the ADU. f. When a permit application for an ADU is submitted with a permit application to create a new single-family dwelling or a new multifamily dwelling on the same lot, provided that the ADU or the parcel satisfies any other criteria listed in this paragraph.
4. When a garage, carport, or covered parking structure is demolished in conjunction with the construction of an ADU or converted to an ADU, off-street parking spaces do not need to be replaced.
5. A demolition permit for a detached garage that is to be replaced with an ADU shall be reviewed with the application for the ADU and issued at the same time.
M. ADU Rental. An ADU or JADU may be rented separate from the primary residence but may not be sold or otherwise conveyed separate from the primary residence.
Rentals of any ADU or JADU must be for longer than thirty days.
N. Owner Occupancy. The owner occupancy requirements detailed in this section shall apply to all lawfully permitted ADUs and JADUs within the Town on a singlefamily lot:
1. ADUs and JADUs permitted before January 1, 2020. The owner-occupancy requirements applicable to the ADU or JADU at the time of its permitting shall apply.
2. For ADUs and JADUs permitted on or after January 1, 2020, no owneroccupancy requirements shall apply.
O. Passageways and Internal Connections.
1. No passageway, as defined in California Government Code Section 65852.2, that is unobstructed clear to the sky and extends from a street to one entrance
Attachment 7
Ordinance ______ Page 10 of 16 Date
of the ADU, shall be required in conjunction with the construction of an ADU or JADU.
2. Internal connections are allowed for attached ADUs and JADUs.
3. Internal connections are not allowed for detached ADUs to other accessory buildings, unless the connection facilitates an interior stairwell that provides access to a detached ADU located above a garage.
P. Compliance with Applicable Requirements. ADUs and JADUs shall meet all applicable zoning and fire regulations and shall comply with local building codes.
Fire sprinklers shall not be required for the ADU if they are not required for the primary residence. The construction of an accessory dwelling unit shall not trigger a requirement for fire sprinklers to be installed in the existing primary dwelling.
Q. Nonconforming conditions. Nonconforming zoning conditions do not need to be corrected as part of an ADU or JADU approval. An ADU shall be approved regardless of nonconforming zoning conditions, building code violations, or unpermitted structures that do not present a threat to public health and safety and are not affected by the construction of the accessory dwelling unit.
R. Impact Fees. No impact fees will be charged on an ADU less than 750 square feet.
Any impact fees charged for an accessory dwelling unit of 750 square feet or more shall be charged proportionately in relation to the square footage of the primary dwelling unit.
S. Utility Connections. A new ADU where there is an existing main residence shall not be required to have separate utility connections. A new ADU combined with a new house shall have separate utility connections. The connection may be subject to a connection fee or capacity charge that shall be proportionate to the burden of the proposed accessory dwelling unit, based upon either its square feet or the number of its drainage fixture unit (DFU) values, as defined in the Uniform Plumbing Code adopted and published by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials, upon the water or sewer system. This fee or charge shall not exceed the reasonable cost of providing this service.
T. A certificate of occupancy for an accessory dwelling unit will only be issued after a certificate of occupancy is issued for the primary dwelling.
U. In enforcing building standards pursuant to Article 1 (commencing with Section 17960) of Chapter 5 of Part 1.5 of Division 13 of the Health and Safety Code for an accessory dwelling unit described in paragraph (1) or (2), the Town of Atherton upon request of an owner of an accessory dwelling unit for a delay in enforcement, shall delay enforcement of a building standard, subject to compliance with Section 17980.12 of the Health and Safety Code:
1. The accessory dwelling unit was built before January 1, 2020.
Attachment 7
Ordinance ______ Page 11 of 16 Date
2. The accessory dwelling unit was built on or after January 1, 2020, in the Town of Atherton that, at the time the accessory dwelling unit was built, had a noncompliant accessory dwelling unit ordinance, but the ordinance is compliant at the time the request is made.
17.52.050 Application Review.
A completed application for an ADU or JADU that complies with the provisions of this chapter shall be considered ministerial, without discretionary review or a public hearing, within sixty days after receiving a complete application unless either:
A. The applicant requests a delay, in which case the 60-day time period is tolled for the period of the requested delay; or
B. If a permit application for an ADU or JADU is submitted along with a permit application to create a new primary residence, the Town may delay acting on the permit application for the ADU or JADU until the Town acts on the permit application to create the new primary residence. At such time the permit application for such ADU or JADU is considered, it will still be considered ministerially without discretionary review or a public hearing, regardless of its having been submitted along with an application for a new primary residence.
Section 4. AMENDMENTS TO ATHERTON MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 17.36 Chapter 17.36 is hereby amended to include Accessory Dwelling Units as a land use permitted by right as follows:
17.36.030 Allowed Uses and Permit Requirements.
Table 17.36.030-1 (Allowed Uses and Permit Requirements for PFS District) identifies the allowed uses in the PFS district subject to the development standards of this chapter and all other provisions of this title. Allowed use provisions are symbolized in the table as follows:
P = Land use permitted by right
CUP = Land use permitted with
approval of a conditional
use permit
L/ER = Land use permitted with
location and environmental
review
Attachment 7
Ordinance ______ Page 12 of 16 Date
Table 17.36.030-1. Allowed Uses and Permit Requirements for PFS District Zoning
District
Land Use
PFS
Public library P
Public school P
Town corporation
yard
P
Town hall and
associated
community uses
P
Accessory Dwelling
Unit in conjunction
with multifamily
residential uses
P
Emergency shelters P4
Churches and places
of worship
CUP
Convents CUP
Country clubs CUP
Residential
associated with
primary
CUP
Attachment 7
Ordinance ______ Page 13 of 16 Date
Zoning
District
Land Use
PFS
nonresidential use of
property on same
site1
Multiple-family
residential uses that
could accommodate
housing for very lowand low-income
households
associated with
primary
nonresidential use of
property on same site
L/ER5
Private schools CUP2, 3
Public utilities and
facilities, uses, and
structures
CUP
Transportation
terminal facilities
CUP
Notes:
1 Examples include dorms or teacher housing associated with school site, convent when associated with religious institutions, etc.
2 Where a master plan for a private school has been prepared and filed with the town for public record, any application for a conditional use permit shall be compared to the master plan for consistency with that document. All building and/or faculty changes, improvements, or new construction shall require a conditional use permit. To that end, all conditional use permit applications shall include the following:
a. Maps and diagrams showing the proposal in relation to the master plan layout; b. History of student and faculty growth and projections of future growth, including an analysis of that growth’s consistency with the master plan projections;
Attachment 7
Ordinance ______ Page 14 of 16 Date
c. A traffic and parking analysis of the proposal and comparison to the master plan projections;
d. A circulation plan showing how the traffic and pedestrian circulation will function upon implementation of the proposals; and
e. Other information that might be required for specific proposals, such as noise analyses, lighting plans, landscape screening plans, heritage tree locations, and other similar information.
3 In addition to other conditions of approval, the planning commission shall require the following items where relevant:
a. Identification of the approved uses and hours of operation; and b. Clustering of high intensity or noise-intense structures and uses (such as gymnasiums, theaters, athletic facilities) away from neighboring residential uses, where possible.
4 Emergency shelters shall be permitted only when located within the Town Civic Center property; defined as Lots 1, 2, 24, 25 and 26, Watlinton Park RSM (Resubdivision Maps) 5/8.
5 Where a master plan for a private school has been prepared and filed with the town for public record that includes multifamily residential uses that could accommodate housing for very low- and low-income households, such multifamily residential uses shall be subject to planning commission public hearing and review of the location, size, proximity to heritage trees and environmental aspects of the project but shall not result in the denial of the use.
Section 5. AMENDMENTS TO ATHERTON MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER
17.60 Chapter 17.60 is hereby amended to the definition of "Kitchen" and add the definition of "Efficiency Kitchen,” as follows:
“Kitchen” means any room or area intended or designed to be used or maintained for the cooking, storing, and preparation of food and includes facilities for cleaning, preparation, and storage of food and cooking and eating utensils. A standard kitchen shall have the following:
1. A cooktop, oven, hood vent
2. A refrigerator that has the following minimum dimensions 28 inches wide and 61 inches tall
3. Sink 24 inches wide with at least a 1.5 inch drain
4. Dishwasher
5. Food preparation counter or counters that total at least 20 square feet
6. Storage cabinets that total at least 40 square feet of shelf space
7. Kitchen area of at least 80 square feet
Attachment 7
Ordinance ______ Page 15 of 16 Date
“Efficiency Kitchen” means a kitchen that includes each of the following:
1. A cook top, oven, and hood vent
2. Sink that is at least 18 inches wide with at least a 1.5 inch drain
3. Food preparation counter or counters that total at least 10 square feet in area.
4. Storage cabinets that total at least 30 square feet of shelf space.
5. Kitchen area of at least 50 sq. ft.
Section 6. SEVERABILITY & REVIVAL OF PRIOR TOWN ADU ORDINANCE If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the Ordinance and the application of such provision to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby. To the extent that prior Town ordinances governed any portion of this Ordinance held invalid, such prior Town ordinances shall again become effective if any portion of this Ordinance is held invalid.
Section 7: EFFECTIVE DATE
This Ordinance shall be posted in at least three public places according to law and shall take effect and be in force from and after 30 days after its passage and adoption.
Town of Atherton, a municipal corporation
MAYOR: __________________________________
BILL WIDMER
ATTEST: __________________________________
ANTHONY SUBER, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM: __________________________________
ANDREAS BOOHER, CITY ATTORNEY
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN MATEO SS:
TOWN OF ATHERTON
Attachment 7
Ordinance ______ Page 16 of 16 Date
I, Anthony Suber, City Clerk of the Town of Atherton, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance had its first reading and was introduced during the public meeting of the City Council on the __th day of _________, and had its second reading and was adopted and passed during the public meeting of the City Council on the ____st day of _______, 2023, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST: __________________________
ANTHONY SUBER
City Clerk
Attachment 7
Ordinance ______ Page 1 of 16 Date
DRAFT ORDINANCE _____
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF ATHERTON TO REPEAL AND REPLACE CHAPTER 17.52 AND AMEND CHAPTERS 17.36 AND
17.60 OF THE ATHERTON MUNCIPAL CODE REGULATING ACCESSORY
DWELLING UNITS AND JUNIOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS
WHEREAS, the Town of Atherton has historically regulated the construction of accessory structures within zones designated for residential use in a manner that is consistent with the character of the Town and that values the privacy of the Town’s residents, and
WHEREAS, California has a shortage of housing and particularly affordable housing and the State Legislature has in recent years undertaken a number of measures to incentivize the construction of additional housing stock to address this shortage, and WHEREAS, the City Council supports the construction of additional housing stock throughout the state but strongly opposes the State Legislature’s approach to incentivizing such construction where that approach usurps local land use control, and WHEREAS, the City Council opposes the changes in state law that take away local land use control over the development of accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units, and makes conforming changes to the Atherton Municipal Code under protest.
The City Council of the Town of Atherton does hereby ordain as follows:
Section 1. TITLE
This Ordinance shall be known as the Town of Atherton ("Town") Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance. This Ordinance shall be applicable in the incorporated territory of the Town.
Section 2. PURPOSE & AUTHORITY
The purpose of this Ordinance is to adopt regulations governing the development of accessory dwelling units ("ADUs") and junior accessory dwelling units ("JADUs]") in accordance with the changes made to State ADU laws found at Government Code section 65852 et seq. by various Senate and Assembly Bills, including SB 13, AB 68, and AB 881.
Section 3. AMENDMENTS TO ATHERTON MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER
17.52 Chapter 17.52 is hereby deleted and re-enacted to read as follows:
Attachment 7
Ordinance ______ Page 2 of 16 Date
Chapter 17.52
ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS
Sections:
17.52.010 Purpose.
17.52.020 Zones Allowed.
17.52.030 Definitions.
17.52.040 Development Standards and General Requirements.
17.52.050 Application Review.
17.52.010 Purpose.
The purpose of this chapter is to regulate accessory dwelling units in residential zoning districts and on residential property consistent with state law (California Government Code Section 65852 et seq.). Implementation of this chapter is intended to provide for additional housing opportunities by increasing the number of units available within existing neighborhoods while maintaining the character of the area. The City Council of the Town of Atherton adopts this chapter to comply with SB 13, AB 68, AB 881, AB 2221, and AB 2097 under protest, as it is the Council’s position that in enacting these laws, the legislature has improperly usurped local land use authority.
17.52.020 Zones Allowed.
Junior accessory dwelling units shall be allowed in all areas zoned to allow single-family residential and accessory dwelling units shall be allowed in all areas zoned to allow singlefamily residential and multifamily residential uses in compliance with the development standards set forth in section 17.52.040 (Development Standards and General Requirements) of this Chapter.
17.52.030 Definitions.
A. “Accessory dwelling unit” or “ADU” means a building or portion of a building designed for use and occupancy by people living independently of the occupants of the main residence building. The ADU shall be on the same lot as the main residence. An ADU can be an attached or a detached residential dwelling unit that provides complete independent living facilities for one or more persons and is located on a lot with a proposed or existing single-family or multifamily development. It shall include permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking, and sanitation. An accessory dwelling unit also includes the following:
1. An efficiency unit.
2. A manufactured home, as defined in Section 18007 of the Health and Safety Code.
Attachment 7
Ordinance ______ Page 3 of 16 Date
B. “Attached accessory dwelling unit” means a newly constructed unit that is connected to the primary single-family home by at least one wall.
C. “Detached accessory dwelling unit” means an accessory dwelling unit that is not structurally attached to the main residence.
D. “Efficiency unit” means a living unit which includes all the following:
• Size of at least 150 square feet.
• For units that are not accessible or adaptable, a partial kitchen with a sink (minimum 18 inches wide), a permanently installed two or more burner cooktop and oven, hood vent, and refrigerator (minimum 10 cubic feet), each having a clear working space of not less than 30 inches in front of the counter. o Food preparation counter or counters that total at least 20 square feet. o Storage cabinets that total at least 30 cubic feet of shelf space o A separate closet.
• Compliance with light and ventilation requirements of the Atherton Building Code. • A separate bathroom containing a water closet (toilet), lavatory (bathroom sink) and bathtub and/or shower.
E. “Junior Accessory dwelling unit” or “JADU” means a unit that is no more than 500 square feet in size and contained entirely within a single-family residence. A junior accessory dwelling unit shall include an efficiency kitchen, which shall include all of the following: a cooking facility with appliances and a food preparation counter and storage cabinets that are of reasonable size in relation to the size of the junior accessory dwelling unit. A junior accessory dwelling unit may include separate sanitation facilities or may share sanitation facilities with the existing structure.
F. “Living area” for the purpose of this chapter, means the interior habitable area of a dwelling unit, including basements and attics, but does not include a garage or any accessory structure.
G. “Public transit” means a location, including, but not limited to, a bus stop or train station, where the public may access buses, trains, subways, and other forms of transportation that charge set fares, run on fixed routes, and are available to the public. Pursuant to Section 21155 of the Public Resources Code
17.52.040 Development Standards and General Requirements.
Unless otherwise stated in Section 17.52.050 of this Ordinance, ADUs and JADUs are permitted, provided the following standards and requirements are incorporated and met.
A. Accessory Dwelling Use. All ADUs and JADUs shall be located on the same lot with an existing or proposed dwelling and considered an accessory residential use to the primary residence. ADUs and JADUs do not count towards the allowable density for the lot upon which it is located.
Attachment 7
Ordinance ______ Page 4 of 16 Date
B. Maximum Number of ADUs and JADUs per lot.
1. One ADU and one JADU per lot with a proposed or existing single-family dwelling if all of the following apply:
a. The ADU or JADU is within the proposed space of a single-family dwelling, existing space of a single-family dwelling or in an accessory structure. The ADU may include an expansion of not more than 150 square feet beyond the same physical dimensions as an existing accessory structure. An expansion beyond the physical dimensions of an existing accessory structure shall be limited to accommodating ingress and egress. b. The space has exterior access separate from the proposed or existing single-family dwelling.
c. The side and rear setbacks are sufficient for fire and safety. d. The JADU complies with the requirements of Section 65852.22.
2. One detached, new construction, ADU that does not exceed 800 square-feet, complies with the height restrictions in this section, and provides a minimum of four-foot side and rear yard setbacks for a lot with a proposed or existing single-family dwelling. The accessory dwelling unit may be combined with a JADU.
3. On lots that allow single-family dwellings and are a minimum of two (2) acres, the property owner may have up to two (2) detached ADUs provided that one of the two units is deed restricted as low-income for a period of 15 years or more.
4. Lots that allow multifamily dwellings.
a. Multiple accessory dwelling units are allowed within the portions of existing multifamily dwelling structures that are not used as livable space, including, but not limited to, storage rooms, boiler rooms, passageways, attics, basements, or garages, if each unit complies with state building standards for dwellings.
b. At least one ADU is allowed within an existing multifamily dwelling. The total number of ADUs allowed is up to 25 percent of the existing multifamily dwelling units.
c. Not more than two ADUs that are located on a lot that has an existing or proposed multifamily dwelling, but are detached from that multifamily dwelling and are subject to applicable height limits and a four-foot rear and side setbacks.
i. If an existing multifamily dwelling has a rear or side setback of less than four feet, no modification of the existing multifamily dwelling is required as a condition of approving an ADU.
Attachment 7
Ordinance ______ Page 5 of 16 Date
C. Floor Area Requirements.
1. No ADU or JADU may be smaller than the size required to allow an efficiency unit pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 17958.1, which is 150 square feet. The maximum size of an efficiency unit is 500 square feet.
2. The maximum size for a JADU is 500 square feet.
3. The maximum size for an ADU is 1,200 square feet.
4. The floor area of an attached ADU shall not exceed fifty percent of the existing floor area of the main residence, unless necessary to accommodate at least an 800 square foot ADU.
5. Garage and accessory structures ancillary to an ADU are not considered part of the ADU living area and are not included in the ADU floor area calculations.
D. Exemptions from Maximum Floor Area Limitations.
1. The first 800 square feet of floor area of each ADU, attached and detached, and up to five hundred square feet for each JADU shall be excluded from maximum floor area calculations.
2. Additional floor area for each ADU may be excluded from maximum floor area calculations where staff determines the following conditions are met:
a. If a detached ADU meets and/or exceeds the minimum side and rear setbacks of Chapter 17.40 Accessory Buildings and Structures, then the ADU will be allowed an additional floor area exemption beyond the first 800 square feet of floor area, up to a total of 1,200 square feet. b. If an attached ADU is located in the main buildable area and encroaches into the side and rear yard setbacks by not more than twenty percent (20%) of the required setback, then the ADU shall be allowed an additional floor area exemption beyond the first 800 square feet of floor area, up to a total of twelve 1,200 square feet.
3. No floor area limitation shall be required for any conversion of an existing legal non-conforming building to an ADU.
4. Interior stairs are exempt from floor area calculations if the stairs accommodate access to a new ADU located above an existing or proposed detached garage that complies with accessory structure setback requirements.
E. Basements.
1. Habitable basements are allowed under detached ADUs; however, these basements shall count toward the floor area of the ADU. An internal connection from the ADU to the habitable basement is required. No special structures permit is required for these basements.
Attachment 7
Ordinance ______ Page 6 of 16 Date
2. Habitable basements are allowed under attached ADUs; however, these basements shall count toward the floor area of the ADU if located outside the main building area setback. An internal connection from the ADU to the habitable basement is required.
3. Habitable basements are allowed under a JADU; however, these basements will be considered as the basement for the main residence and will not count toward the square footage of the JADU. No internal connection from the JADU will be allowed into the basement. Basements accommodating JADUs must be within the main building area.
4. Non-habitable basements under ADUs are only allowed outside the accessory structure setback and are subject to the Heritage Tree Ordinance. Exterior access to the non-habitable basement shall be located outside the accessory structure setback.
5. The floor area of an attached ADU or JADU does not count toward the basement allowance under 17.44.030.A.
F. Setback Requirements. Except as specified below, all ADUs and JADUs shall comply with the setback requirements of the zone in which a unit is to be located.
1. JADUs shall have the same setbacks as required for the main residence.
2. A newly constructed detached or attached ADU that is 800 square feet or less must be located at least 4 feet from a side or rear property line. This type of ADU does not have a front yard setback.
a. No decks or mechanical equipment are allowed in the four-foot side and rear setback.
3. A newly constructed attached ADU that has a floor area greater than 800 square feet and no more than 1,200 square feet shall be located in the main building area. These ADUs may encroach into side and rear yard setbacks by not more than twenty percent (20%) of the required setback.
4. A newly constructed detached ADU that has a floor area greater than 800 square feet and no more than 1,200 square feet shall be located maintain the setbacks for accessory buildings.
5. A newly constructed detached ADU shall maintain the required separation distances between the proposed or existing main residence, accessory buildings and accessory structures as required in the accessory structures section of the zoning code, unless necessary to accommodate an ADU of 800 square feet ADU or less.
6. Existing Structure. No setback shall be required for an existing living area or accessory structure or a structure constructed in the same location and to the same dimensions as an existing structure that is converted to an ADU or to a portion of an ADU. A setback of at least four feet from the side and rear lot lines
Attachment 7
Ordinance ______ Page 7 of 16 Date
is required for an accessory dwelling unit that is not converted from an existing structure or a new structure constructed in the same location and to the same dimensions as an existing structure.
7. For double frontage and corner lots, the front yard is the yard that is adjacent to the designated front property. The rear yard shall be the yard adjacent to the property line on the opposite side of the property from the designated front property line. The address for the ADU shall be on the street adjacent to the front yard.
G. Entrance Requirements. Any new attached ADU or JADU that is incorporated into a proposed or existing primary residence shall have a separate entrance facing the side or rear yard, where feasible. Any new detached ADU shall have a separate entrance facing towards the interior of the lot.
H. Height.
1. A maximum height of 16 feet is allowed for a detached ADU on a lot with an existing or proposed single-family or multifamily dwelling.
2. A maximum height of 18 feet is allowed for a detached accessory dwelling unit on a lot with an existing or proposed single-family or multifamily dwelling unit that is within one-half of one mile walking distance of a major transit stop or a high-quality transit corridor. An additional two feet in height to accommodate a roof pitch on the accessory dwelling unit that is aligned with the roof pitch of the primary dwelling unit is also allowed.
3. A maximum height of 18 feet for a detached accessory dwelling unit on a lot with an existing or proposed multifamily, multistory dwelling.
4. A maximum height of 25 feet or the allowed height of the zoning district, whichever is lower, is allowed for an accessory dwelling unit that is attached to a primary dwelling.
5. Accessory dwelling units are limited to 2 stories.
6. A maximum height of 25 feet is allowed for a detached ADU located above a garage, provided that:
a. The total height is inclusive of the garage,
b. The garage complies with the accessory structure setback requirements of the Zoning Code, and,
c. The ADU is accessed through a ground level entry vestibule and an interior stair.
d. The roofline shall be consistent with the style of the main residence. For example, a gabled roof form on the main residence shall require a gabled roof form on the ADU above garage.
Attachment 7
Ordinance ______ Page 8 of 16 Date
e. If the second story floor area accommodating the ADU is less than the ground floor area, the residual roofing above the ground floor shall not accommodate a roof deck or balcony.
I. Heritage Tree Ordinance.
1. The Heritage Tree Ordinance does not apply to ADUs up to 800 square feet and JADUs up to 500 square feet. In all other cases, the Heritage Tree Ordinance applies. The main residence and all other accessory buildings/structures are subject to the Heritage Tree Ordinance.
2. Detached ADUs that are greater than 800 square feet may seek administrative exceptions to the Tree Protection Zone for a distance up to 6x in the R1-A zoning district. The Town Arborist will review such requests for ADUs, concurrently with review by Planning staff.
3. Any tree removal permitted by the Town in relation to the construction of an ADU must occur after the issuance of a related building permit. Such building permit must then adhere to time limits set forth in Atherton Municipal Code (AMC) Section 15.40.180. Penalties and remedies pursuant to AMC
8.10.070(B) may result in cases where trees are removed in relation to the approval of an ADU and the ADU is not constructed.
J. Privacy, Screening and Landscaping.
1. New ADUs constructed above the ground floor shall also be designed to reasonably preserve the privacy of adjacent property owners. Appropriate design techniques to preserve privacy include obscured glazing, the use of clerestory windows that are above eye level, screening treatments, locating windows toward the existing on-site residence, or providing no windows on facades facing adjacent properties.
2. Landscape screening for the ADU shall be installed to the greatest extent feasible.
3. A solid 8 foot high fence shall be provided along the entire front, side, or rear property line adjacent to where the ADU is located. Fences shall be at the property line.
4. No sidewall height limitations apply to ADUs.
K. Lighting Restrictions. Any lighting associated with an ADU or JADU shall be shielded or downlit and shall not shine onto adjoining properties, while meeting the minimum Building Code.
L. Parking Requirements.
1. No parking is required for a JADU.
Attachment 7
Ordinance ______ Page 9 of 16 Date
2. Unless subject to one of the exceptions immediately below, each ADU shall have assigned to it one parking space per ADU. These spaces may be provided as tandem parking on an existing driveway.
3. No additional parking shall be required if one of the following conditions applies to the ADU:
a. The ADU is located within one-half mile walking distance of public transit. b. The ADU is located within an architecturally and historically significant district.
c. The ADU is part of a proposed or existing primary residence or an existing accessory structure.
d. On-street parking permits are required but not offered to the occupant of the ADU.
e. A car share vehicle is located within one block of the ADU. f. When a permit application for an ADU is submitted with a permit application to create a new single-family dwelling or a new multifamily dwelling on the same lot, provided that the ADU or the parcel satisfies any other criteria listed in this paragraph.
4. When a garage, carport, or covered parking structure is demolished in conjunction with the construction of an ADU or converted to an ADU, off-street parking spaces do not need to be replaced.
5. A demolition permit for a detached garage that is to be replaced with an ADU shall be reviewed with the application for the ADU and issued at the same time.
M. ADU Rental. An ADU or JADU may be rented separate from the primary residence but may not be sold or otherwise conveyed separate from the primary residence.
Rentals of any ADU or JADU must be for longer than thirty days.
N. Owner Occupancy. The owner occupancy requirements detailed in this section shall apply to all lawfully permitted ADUs and JADUs within the Town on a singlefamily lot:
1. ADUs and JADUs permitted before January 1, 2020. The owner-occupancy requirements applicable to the ADU or JADU at the time of its permitting shall apply.
2. For ADUs and JADUs permitted on or after January 1, 2020, no owneroccupancy requirements shall apply.
O. Passageways and Internal Connections.
1. No passageway, as defined in California Government Code Section 65852.2, that is unobstructed clear to the sky and extends from a street to one entrance
Attachment 7
Ordinance ______ Page 10 of 16 Date
of the ADU, shall be required in conjunction with the construction of an ADU or JADU.
2. Internal connections are allowed for attached ADUs and JADUs.
3. Internal connections are not allowed for detached ADUs to other accessory buildings, unless the connection facilitates an interior stairwell that provides access to a detached ADU located above a garage.
P. Compliance with Applicable Requirements. ADUs and JADUs shall meet all applicable zoning and fire regulations and shall comply with local building codes.
Fire sprinklers shall not be required for the ADU if they are not required for the primary residence. The construction of an accessory dwelling unit shall not trigger a requirement for fire sprinklers to be installed in the existing primary dwelling.
Q. Nonconforming conditions. Nonconforming zoning conditions do not need to be corrected as part of an ADU or JADU approval. An ADU shall be approved regardless of nonconforming zoning conditions, building code violations, or unpermitted structures that do not present a threat to public health and safety and are not affected by the construction of the accessory dwelling unit.
R. Impact Fees. No impact fees will be charged on an ADU less than 750 square feet.
Any impact fees charged for an accessory dwelling unit of 750 square feet or more shall be charged proportionately in relation to the square footage of the primary dwelling unit.
S. Utility Connections. A new ADU where there is an existing main residence shall not be required to have separate utility connections. A new ADU combined with a new house shall have separate utility connections. The connection may be subject to a connection fee or capacity charge that shall be proportionate to the burden of the proposed accessory dwelling unit, based upon either its square feet or the number of its drainage fixture unit (DFU) values, as defined in the Uniform Plumbing Code adopted and published by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials, upon the water or sewer system. This fee or charge shall not exceed the reasonable cost of providing this service.
T. A certificate of occupancy for an accessory dwelling unit will only be issued after a certificate of occupancy is issued for the primary dwelling.
U. In enforcing building standards pursuant to Article 1 (commencing with Section 17960) of Chapter 5 of Part 1.5 of Division 13 of the Health and Safety Code for an accessory dwelling unit described in paragraph (1) or (2), the Town of Atherton upon request of an owner of an accessory dwelling unit for a delay in enforcement, shall delay enforcement of a building standard, subject to compliance with Section 17980.12 of the Health and Safety Code:
1. The accessory dwelling unit was built before January 1, 2020.
Attachment 7
Ordinance ______ Page 11 of 16 Date
2. The accessory dwelling unit was built on or after January 1, 2020, in the Town of Atherton that, at the time the accessory dwelling unit was built, had a noncompliant accessory dwelling unit ordinance, but the ordinance is compliant at the time the request is made.
17.52.050 Application Review.
A completed application for an ADU or JADU that complies with the provisions of this chapter shall be considered ministerial, without discretionary review or a public hearing, within sixty days after receiving a complete application unless either:
A. The applicant requests a delay, in which case the 60-day time period is tolled for the period of the requested delay; or
B. If a permit application for an ADU or JADU is submitted along with a permit application to create a new primary residence, the Town may delay acting on the permit application for the ADU or JADU until the Town acts on the permit application to create the new primary residence. At such time the permit application for such ADU or JADU is considered, it will still be considered ministerially without discretionary review or a public hearing, regardless of its having been submitted along with an application for a new primary residence.
Section 4. AMENDMENTS TO ATHERTON MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 17.36 Chapter 17.36 is hereby amended to include Accessory Dwelling Units as a land use permitted by right as follows:
17.36.030 Allowed Uses and Permit Requirements.
Table 17.36.030-1 (Allowed Uses and Permit Requirements for PFS District) identifies the allowed uses in the PFS district subject to the development standards of this chapter and all other provisions of this title. Allowed use provisions are symbolized in the table as follows:
P = Land use permitted by right
CUP = Land use permitted with
approval of a conditional
use permit
L/ER = Land use permitted with
location and environmental
review
Attachment 7
Ordinance ______ Page 12 of 16 Date
Table 17.36.030-1. Allowed Uses and Permit Requirements for PFS District Zoning
District
Land Use
PFS
Public library P
Public school P
Town corporation
yard
P
Town hall and
associated
community uses
P
Accessory Dwelling
Unit in conjunction
with multifamily
residential uses
P
Emergency shelters P4
Churches and places
of worship
CUP
Convents CUP
Country clubs CUP
Residential
associated with
primary
CUP
Attachment 7
Ordinance ______ Page 13 of 16 Date
Zoning
District
Land Use
PFS
nonresidential use of
property on same
site1
Multiple-family
residential uses that
could accommodate
housing for very lowand low-income
households
associated with
primary
nonresidential use of
property on same site
L/ER5
Private schools CUP2, 3
Public utilities and
facilities, uses, and
structures
CUP
Transportation
terminal facilities
CUP
Notes:
1 Examples include dorms or teacher housing associated with school site, convent when associated with religious institutions, etc.
2 Where a master plan for a private school has been prepared and filed with the town for public record, any application for a conditional use permit shall be compared to the master plan for consistency with that document. All building and/or faculty changes, improvements, or new construction shall require a conditional use permit. To that end, all conditional use permit applications shall include the following:
a. Maps and diagrams showing the proposal in relation to the master plan layout; b. History of student and faculty growth and projections of future growth, including an analysis of that growth’s consistency with the master plan projections;
Attachment 7
Ordinance ______ Page 14 of 16 Date
c. A traffic and parking analysis of the proposal and comparison to the master plan projections;
d. A circulation plan showing how the traffic and pedestrian circulation will function upon implementation of the proposals; and
e. Other information that might be required for specific proposals, such as noise analyses, lighting plans, landscape screening plans, heritage tree locations, and other similar information.
3 In addition to other conditions of approval, the planning commission shall require the following items where relevant:
a. Identification of the approved uses and hours of operation; and b. Clustering of high intensity or noise-intense structures and uses (such as gymnasiums, theaters, athletic facilities) away from neighboring residential uses, where possible.
4 Emergency shelters shall be permitted only when located within the Town Civic Center property; defined as Lots 1, 2, 24, 25 and 26, Watlinton Park RSM (Resubdivision Maps) 5/8.
5 Where a master plan for a private school has been prepared and filed with the town for public record that includes multifamily residential uses that could accommodate housing for very low- and low-income households, such multifamily residential uses shall be subject to planning commission public hearing and review of the location, size, proximity to heritage trees and environmental aspects of the project but shall not result in the denial of the use.
Section 5. AMENDMENTS TO ATHERTON MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER
17.60 Chapter 17.60 is hereby amended to the definition of "Kitchen" and add the definition of "Efficiency Kitchen,” as follows:
“Kitchen” means any room or area intended or designed to be used or maintained for the cooking, storing, and preparation of food and includes facilities for cleaning, preparation, and storage of food and cooking and eating utensils. A standard kitchen shall have the following:
1. A cooktop, oven, hood vent
2. A refrigerator that has the following minimum dimensions 28 inches wide and 61 inches tall
3. Sink 24 inches wide with at least a 1.5 inch drain
4. Dishwasher
5. Food preparation counter or counters that total at least 20 square feet
6. Storage cabinets that total at least 40 square feet of shelf space
7. Kitchen area of at least 80 square feet
Attachment 7
Ordinance ______ Page 15 of 16 Date
“Efficiency Kitchen” means a kitchen that includes each of the following:
1. A cook top, oven, and hood vent
2. Sink that is at least 18 inches wide with at least a 1.5 inch drain
3. Food preparation counter or counters that total at least 10 square feet in area.
4. Storage cabinets that total at least 30 square feet of shelf space.
5. Kitchen area of at least 50 sq. ft.
Section 6. SEVERABILITY & REVIVAL OF PRIOR TOWN ADU ORDINANCE If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the Ordinance and the application of such provision to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby. To the extent that prior Town ordinances governed any portion of this Ordinance held invalid, such prior Town ordinances shall again become effective if any portion of this Ordinance is held invalid.
Section 7: EFFECTIVE DATE
This Ordinance shall be posted in at least three public places according to law and shall take effect and be in force from and after 30 days after its passage and adoption.
Town of Atherton, a municipal corporation
MAYOR: __________________________________
BILL WIDMER
ATTEST: __________________________________
ANTHONY SUBER, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM: __________________________________
ANDREAS BOOHER, CITY ATTORNEY
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN MATEO SS:
TOWN OF ATHERTON
Attachment 7
Ordinance ______ Page 16 of 16 Date
I, Anthony Suber, City Clerk of the Town of Atherton, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance had its first reading and was introduced during the public meeting of the City Council on the __th day of _________, and had its second reading and was adopted and passed during the public meeting of the City Council on the ____st day of _______, 2023, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST: __________________________
ANTHONY SUBER
City Clerk
Town of Atherton
ADU Ordinance Update
City Council
November 15, 2023
1
Recommendation
Staff recommends that City Council conduct a public
hearing to introduce an ordinance to:
• repeal and replace Chapter 17.52 “Accessory Dwelling
Units,” and
• amend Chapter 17.36 “Public Facilities and Schools
District (PFS)” and Chapter 17.60 “Definitions.”
2
Background
Major
overhaul
of ADU
legislation
by State
2019
Town
updates
ADU
Ordinance
2020
Ongoing
changes to
State law
2020 -
2023
Town
updates to
align with
State law
Now
3 6
th Cycle
Housing Element
Process
2022 -
Now
Areas of Change
4 • Definitions
• Accessory Dwelling Use
• Maximum Number of
Units
• Floor Area Requirements
• Exemptions from
Maximum Floor Area
Requirements
• Basements
• Setback Requirements
• Height
• Heritage Trees
• Privacy, Screening and
Landscaping
• Parking Requirements
• Owner Occupancy
• Passageways and Internal
Connections
• Compliance with Applicable
Requirements
• Impact Fees
• Utilities
• Certificate of Occupancies
• Code Enforcement
• Public Facilities and School
Districts (PFS) Zoning
Controls
• “Kitchen” and “Efficiency
Kitchen” Definitions
Areas of Change – Per State Law
5 • Definitions
• Accessory Dwelling Use
• Maximum Number of
Units
• Floor Area Requirements
• Exemptions from
Maximum Floor Area
Requirements
• Basements
• Setback Requirements
• Height
• Heritage Trees
• Privacy, Screening and
Landscaping
• Parking Requirements
• Owner Occupancy
• Passageways and Internal
Connections
• Compliance with Applicable
Requirements
• Impact Fees
• Utilities
• Certificate of Occupancies
• Code Enforcement
• Public Facilities and School
Districts (PFS) Zoning
Controls
• “Kitchen” and “Efficiency
Kitchen” Definitions
(Changes required by State law) Page 282 of 330
Inserting Town Influence
6 Bonus ADU
Program
Number of ADUs
Deed Restricted
Affordability
ADUs above
Garages
Height, Setbacks,
Floor Area
Roofline, Entry
Locations,
Window
Treatments
Heritage
Trees
Flexibility for
+800sf ADUs
Review Process
Town Objectives:
1) Incentivize compliance with Town’s standards
2) Incentivize ADU development to meet the Town’s RHNA objectives
Maximum Number of Units
7 (e) (1) Notwithstanding subdivisions (a) to (d), inclusive, a local agency shall ministerially approve an application for a building permit within a residential or mixed-use zone to create any of the following:
(A) One accessory dwelling unit or one junior accessory dwelling unit per lot with a proposed or existing single-family dwelling if all of the following apply… (B) One detached, new construction, accessory dwelling unit that does not exceed four-foot side and rear yard setbacks for a lot with a proposed or existing single-family dwelling. The accessory dwelling unit may be combined with a junior accessory dwelling unit described in subparagraph (A)… State Law (how it used to be):
1 ADU or 1 JADU (subject to conditions)
1 detached, new construction, ADU
2 units
+
=
Maximum Number of Units
8 (e) (1) Notwithstanding subdivisions (a) to (d), inclusive, a local agency shall ministerially approve an application for a building permit within a residential or mixed-use zone to create any of the following:
(A) One accessory dwelling unit and one junior accessory dwelling unit per lot with a proposed or existing single-family dwelling if all of the following apply… (B) One detached, new construction, accessory dwelling unit that does not exceed four-foot side and rear yard setbacks for a lot with a proposed or existing single-family dwelling. The accessory dwelling unit may be combined with a junior accessory dwelling unit described in subparagraph (A)… State Law (now):
1 ADU (subject to conditions)
1 JADU (subject to conditions)
1 detached, new construction, ADU
3 units
+
=
Bonus ADU Program
9 Allow the zoning code to allow two ADUs to be constructed on properties two acres or greater than area.
Housing Element Program 3.812(F):
1 ADU (subject to conditions)
1 JADU (subject to conditions)
1 detached, new construction, ADU
3 units
+
=
+
1 BONUS ADU
(+2 ACRE LOTS
ONLY)
• Timeframe:15 years
• Affordability level: “Low-Income”
Deed Restriction Component:
ADUs Above Garages
10 Height
• Maximum
height of
structure
(including
garage and
ADU)
• Roof form
Floor Area
Exemptions
• Ground level
entry
• Enclosed stairs
Privacy
• No
balconies/decks
• Window
standards
• 8 foot fencing
• Landscaping
Objective:
Incentivize compliance with Town’s setbacks by
allowing ADUs above existing or proposed detached garages
Heritage Trees
11 TPZ Exceptions
• Administrative up
to 6x in the R1-A
Review Process
• Reviewed during
Planning
consideration
• 6x would require
information at
submittal of
application
Good Faith
Removal
• Asserts timeline
requirements for
ADU construction
• Asserts potential
penalties
Objective:
Incentivize compliance with Town’s setbacks by providing greater flexibility with Heritage Tree Ordinance for larger, setback compliant ADUs
Next Steps
12 City
Council
• Consideration of Draft Ordinance
• Adopted Ordinance sent to State
for review
HCD
• Review of Ordinance, required
changes back to Planning Commission
and City Council for consideration.
Housing
Element
• HCD Certification of Ordinance
supports Town’s progress with
Housing Element programs
Recommendation
Staff recommends that City Council conduct a public
hearing to introduce an ordinance to:
• repeal and replace Chapter 17.52 “Accessory Dwelling
Units,” and
• amend Chapter 17.36 “Public Facilities and Schools
District (PFS)” and Chapter 17.60 “Definitions.”
13
Thank you
14
Item No. 10
Town of Atherton
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT – REGULAR AGENDA
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: GEORGE RODERICKS, CITY MANAGER
DATE: NOVEMBER 15, 2023
SUBJECT: Review of Charter for an Atherton Youth Advisory Group and Provide Direction to Staff
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Council review the draft Charter for an Atherton Youth Advisory Group and provide direction to staff to continue engage with the Group and incorporate the Group into relevant projects and activities.
BACKGROUND
Fiona Lempres, a student at Sacred Heart Schools, approached the Town with an idea to create a Youth Advisory Group to provide input and advice to the City Council, Town Committee and staff on issues and projects that may be of importance to the local youth community. Ms. Lempres met with the Mayor and received additional input regarding the potential role of a Youth Advisory Group, formation of a Charter, potential membership, and activities that might be of interest.
Following that meeting, Ms. Lempres created a draft Charter for consideration by the Town.
ANALYSIS
Attached to this Staff Report is a draft Atherton Youth Advisory Group Charter created by Ms.
Lempres. The goal of the Group would be to provide input and advice to the City Council, Town Committees, and staff on issues or projects that may be of importance to the local youth community. The Charter lays out the purpose of the Group to assist with Town events, provide input as requested, create a forum for discussions of teen issues, plan and implement at least one youth project a year making a unique contribution to the Town, and participating as guests at at least one Council meeting per year where an issue of interest is being discussed.
The Group would consist of at least 6 members with an intent to have at least two members from each of the three high schools in Town. The Group would meet on a periodic basis during the academic year, generally September 1 through April 30. At this time, Ms. Lempres has gathered a group of 5 Atherton teens and may have the commitment of one or two more. The Group has had one organizational meeting. Members of the Group may be present this evening and can be
Charter for Youth Advisory Council
NOVEMBER 15, 2023
introduced by Ms. Lempres.
The Youth Advisory Group would not be a formal Town Committee or Commission, nor would the Charter be formally approved by the City Council. Either of these actions would transform the Group into a formal Brown Act governed body. However, the Council can officially recognize the Group and direct staff to engage with the Group where and when appropriate. In addition, as the Council looks to make revisions to the Town’s Committee Resolution in January/February 2024, the Council can direct changes to the Charters of appropriate Committees to solicit ex-officio representation from a member of the Youth Advisory Group, when possible.
Ms. Lempres has advised that while the Group’s main focus is to learn and support the community in Town, there are some specific activities that the Group may focus upon for youth participation.
These include:
• Community Building Events, such as the Annual Easter Egg Hunt • Earth Day and Other Environmental Issues
• Voter Registration Drives aimed at young voters
• School-Route Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact.
GOAL ALIGNMENT
This Report and its contents are in alignment with the following Council Policy Goals:
• Goal Area E – Strengthen Community Engagement and Transparency
POLICY FOCUS
The Council’s Policy Focus on this issue revolves around the benefits of engaging the local youth community in decision-making and community activities and whether the proposed Youth Advisory Group is the proper forum.
PUBLIC NOTICE
Public notification was achieved by posting the agenda, with this agenda item being listed, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting in print and electronically. Information about the project is also disseminated via the Town’s electronic News Flash and Atherton Online. There are approximately 1,200 subscribers to the Town’s electronic News Flash publications. Subscribers include residents as well as stakeholders –to include, but be not limited to, media outlets, school districts, Menlo Park Fire Protection District, service provides (water, power, and sewer), and regional elected officials.
COMMISSION/COMMITTEE FEEDBACK/REFERRAL
This item has not been before a Town Committee or Commission
Charter for Youth Advisory Council
NOVEMBER 15, 2023
ATTACHMENTS
1. Draft Charter for the Youth Advisory Group created by Fiona Lempres
Atherton Youth Advisory Group
Atherton has nine schools in town
1 . The combined student population is over 7,000
students. This is approximately the same as the Town’s population. The Town has nearly as many high school students (4,500) as registered voters (5,000). The students have no targeted representation in the Town’s governance. The Town Council would benefit from hearing the students’ voice and perspective on issues affecting youth in the Town.
The Atherton Youth Advisory Group’s goal is to provide input and advice to the City Council, Committees, and Staff on issues and projects important to youth and to provide a higher level of civic involvement by youth in Atherton.
The Youth Advisory Group’s purpose is to:
● Assist at Town events in the role of student organizers and volunteers; ● Provide input as requested by the City Council, Committees or Staff; ● Create a forum for the discussion of teen issues;
● Plan and implement at least one youth project annually that makes a unique contribution to the Atherton community;
● Help improve Youth understanding of the role and responsibilities of local government by; and
● Participate as guests in at least one City Council meeting where an issue of interest to the Youth Advisory Group is discussed.
The Advisory Group will consist of at least 6 members. The intent to is have two members from each of the three high schools in Town
2 . The group would meet on a periodic basis during the academic year (generally September 1 – April 30).
2 Menlo-Atherton High School, Menlo School, and Sacred Heart Preparatory, Atherton 1 Sacred Heart Schools, Atherton operates three separate schools: an elementary; middle and high school.
Item No. 11
Town of Atherton
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT – REGULAR AGENDA
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
GEORGE RODERICKS, CITY MANAGER
FROM: MONA EBRAHIMI, CITY ATTORNEY
DATE: NOVEMBER 15, 2023
SUBJECT: Conflict Waiver Request from Burke Williams and Sorenson
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council consider the conflict waiver requested by the law firm of Burke, Williams & Sorenson, and decide whether to grant a conflict waiver.
BACKGROUND
The law firm of Burke, Williams and Sorenson (BWS) provides the Town of Atherton legal advice and representation in labor and employment matters by attorney Mark Wilson and other attorneys at his office. On October 27, 2023, the City Manager received the attached email from Mr. Wilson, explaining that his colleague, Eric Phillips, had been asked by David Arata to represent him in connection with the Town's housing element and related approvals. Mr. Arata owns the property in town located at 23 Oakwood Boulevard.
ANALYSIS
The California Rules of Professional Conduct explain that in order for BWS to represent a property owner that may have an adverse interest to another client in which it is representing, both parties must agree to the dual representation by signing conflict of interest waivers. BWS reasonably believes that it will be able to provide competent and diligent representation to Mr. Arata and to the Town in the separate matters. At this time, representation does not involve the assertion of a claim by one client against another client in the same litigation, but that could be a possibility in the future if, for example, Mr. Arata challenged the Town's housing element or related approvals.
If the conflict-of-interest waiver is granted, the City Council may delegate authority to the Mayor to execute said waiver. If the conflict-of-interest waiver is not granted, staff would communicate this decision to BWS. Under the latter scenario, BWS would continue serving the Town but would not represent Mr. Arata.
FISCAL IMPACT
Conflict Waiver
NOVEMBER 15, 2023
There is no identifiable fiscal impact to the Town.
GOAL ALIGNMENT
This Report and its contents are in alignment with the following Council Policy Goals:
• Goal Area A – Maintain Fiscal Responsibility
• Goal Area F – Be Forward-Thinking, Well-Managed, and Well-Planned
PUBLIC NOTICE
Public notification was achieved by posting the agenda, with this agenda item being listed, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting in print and electronically. Information about the project is also disseminated via the Town’s electronic News Flash and Atherton Online. There are approximately 1,200 subscribers to the Town’s electronic News Flash publications. Subscribers include residents as well as stakeholders –to include, but be not limited to, media outlets, school districts, Menlo Park Fire Protection District, service provides (water, power, and sewer), and regional elected officials.
COMMISSION/COMMITTEE FEEDBACK/REFERRAL
This item has not been before a Town Committee or Commission
ATTACHMENTS
1. October 27, 2023 Conflict Waiver
Los Angeles – Inland Empire – Marin County – Oakland – Orange County – Palm Desert – San Francisco – Silicon Valley – Ventura County
1999 Harrison Street - Suite 1650
Oakland, California 94612-3501
voice 510.273.8780 - fax 510.839.9104
www.bwslaw.com
Mobile No.: (202) 262-1961
[email protected]
October 27, 2023
Via Email
George Rodericks
City Manager
Town of Atherton
80 Fair Oaks Lane
Atherton, CA 94027
RE: Conflict of Interest Waiver – David Arata
Dear George:
As described in our email correspondence and phone discussion, David Arata has asked Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP (“BWS”), specifically Eric Phillips, to represent Mr. Arata in connection with the property located at 23 Oakwood Boulevard (the “Oakwood Property Matter”) in the Town of Atherton (“Town”).
The Oakwood Property Matter would involve reviewing and commenting on the Town’s draft housing element and objective development standards in an effort to facilitate the Town’s adoption of such documents in a manner that satisfies state requirements while preserving flexibility for future housing development on the property.
As you know, I and other BWS attorneys represent the Town in connection with unrelated labor and employment and general municipal law matters (collectively, the “Town Matters”).
In order for BWS to represent Mr. Arata in the Oakwood Property Matter, and at the same time represent the Town in the Town Matters and other potential, similar future matters, both Mr. Arata and the Town must waive any potential or existing conflicts of interest. Mr. Arata has agreed to execute a waiver regarding these matters.
The California Rules of Professional Conduct, which regulate the conduct of members of the State Bar, provide specific guidance as to actual and potential conflicts of interest. California Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.7 governs the conduct of
October 27, 2023
member of the California State Bar regarding conflicts of interest. Rule 1.7 prohibits attorneys “without informed written consent” to represent a client:
a. “if the representation is directly adverse to another client in the same or a separate matter” or
b. “if there is a significant risk the lawyer’s representation of the client will be materially limited by the lawyer’s responsibilities to or relationships with another client, a former client or a third person, or by the lawyer’s own interests.”
The Rule further provides:
c. “Even when a significant risk requiring a lawyer to comply with paragraph (b) is not present, a lawyer shall not represent a client without written disclosure of the relationship to the client and compliance with paragraph (d) where:
(1) “the lawyer has, or knows that another lawyer in the lawyer’s firm has, a legal, business, financial, professional, or personal relationship with or responsibility to a party or witness in the same matter” d. “Representation is permitted under this rule only if the lawyer complies with paragraphs (a), (b), and (c), and:
(1) “the lawyer reasonably believes that the lawyer will be able to provide competent and diligent representation to each affected client; (2) “the representation is not prohibited by law; and
(3) “the representation does not involve the assertion of a claim by one client against another client represented by the lawyer in the same litigation or other proceeding before a tribunal.”
Under Rule 1.7, representation is permitted if both clients provide informed written consent by executing a written conflict of interest waiver and: (1) the firm reasonably believes that it will be able to provide competent and diligent representation to each affected client; (2) the representation is not prohibited by law; and (3) the representation does not involve the assertion of a claim by one client against another client represented by the firm in the same litigation.
October 27, 2023
BWS reasonably believes (1) that it will be able to provide competent and diligent representation to Mr. Arata and to the Town in the separate matters; (2) the representation is not prohibited by law; and (3) the representation does not involve the assertion of a claim by one client against another client represented by BWS in the same litigation. Accordingly, if Mr. Arata and the Town execute written waivers, the representation of Mr. Arata in the Oakwood Property Matter is permissible.
In this type of potential conflict where we are representing two current clients on unrelated matters, we acknowledge that there may be a perception that client information might be shared among attorneys representing such clients, or that we may favor one client over another. We assure you that we adhere to our California statutory obligation to maintain inviolate the Town’s confidential information. In connection with the above, the Town should also know that information relating to our representation of any and all clients is protected as required by Business and Professions Code Section 6068(e). We also will make every effort to treat Mr. Arata and the Town equally without favoring either one over the other to any party’s disadvantage.
You may waive the conflict of interest arising from our firm’s representation of Mr.
Arata on the Oakwood Property Matter by signing this letter where indicated below and returning it to me via email. We request that the Town provide informed written consent of the following:
• The potential exists that the Town’s interests may become adverse to Mr. Arata’s interests in the Oakwood Property Matter, and, in the event of any litigation or arbitration proceedings between the Town and Mr. Arata, BWS would not represent either the Town or Mr. Arata in connection with such proceedings; and • The Town agrees that BWS may continue to represent Mr. Arata in connection with other unrelated matters in the event that any conflict develops between the Town and Mr. Arata in connection with the Oakwood Property Matter.
If the Town agrees to this conflict waiver request, please sign and return an electronic pdf copy of this letter to me at the email address above. Please note that this letter may be disclosed at the discretion of BWS in connection with any judicial, administrative, or regulatory matter in which the potential conflict becomes relevant.
October 27, 2023
If you have any questions or wish to discuss the contents of this letter further, please contact me at (202) 262-1961. We greatly value the firm’s relationship with the Town, and appreciate your consideration of this request. Thank you very much.
Sincerely,
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN, LLP
Mark Wilson
On behalf of the Town of Atherton, I am authorized and hereby waive the conflict arising from BWS’ representation of David Arata as described above.
The Town of Atherton
By:___________________________
Name:________________________
Title: _________________________
Date: ______________, 2023
Item No. 12
Town of Atherton
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT – REGULAR AGENDA
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
GEORGE RODERICKS, CITY MANAGER
FROM: BRITTANY BENDIX, TOWN PLANNER
DATE: NOVEMBER 15, 2023
SUBJECT: RECIEVE AN UPDATE ON THE STATUS OF THE TOWN OF ATHERTON’S 2023-2031 HOUSING ELEMENT AND A REPORT ON
NEXT STEPS TO RECEIVE CERTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATION
Receive an update on the status and next steps to complete and certify the Town of Atherton’s 2023-2031 Housing Element.
BACKGROUND
On January 31, 2023 the Town Council adopted Atherton’s 2023-31 Housing Element. Pursuant to state law, the Town then submitted a copy of the adopted housing element to the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) for review and certification. On April 4, 2023, the Town received a letter from HCD that found the adopted housing element addresses many statutory requirements; however, additional revisions are necessary to substantially comply with State Housing Element Law (Article 10.6 of the Government Code). Furthermore, because the Town did not adopt a compliant housing element within 120 days of the statutory deadline (January 31, 2023), any rezoning required to enact the element’s housing programs and achieve its regional housing needs allocation must be completed by January 31, 2024.
The following report provides an update on the status of the Housing Element revisions and the next steps required to complete the process and achieve certification.
DISCUSSION
There are three major tracts of updates happening concurrently that will inform the updated Housing Element for 2023-2031 that the Town submits for re-evaluation by HCD. The first process is environmental review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
The second process is the adoption of amendments to the Town’s Planning Code that are necessary to advance the programs in the adopted Housing Element. The third process includes text revisions to the adopted Housing Element that reflect any changes or refinements pursued by
Housing Element Update
November 15, 2023
the Town since January 31, 2023. The status of each process and next steps are discussed individually below.
Environmental Review
At City Council meetings in July and September of this year, staff received direction on the Project Description for use during the CEQA evaluation process. The purpose of the environmental analysis is to evaluate the potential impacts associated with the project, in this case, the Housing Element and related zoning code changes. The analysis begins with an “initial study” that informs the degree of potential impacts and whether or not a “Negative Declaration” or “Environmental Impact Report” (EIR) is required to identify and/or mitigate any impacts per CEQA. At this time, staff is working with consultants in special topic areas to complete the initial study. This component of the Housing Element update process is currently the most influential from a timeline standpoint. This is because the outcome of this analysis requires at least a 30-day public comment period, depending upon the type of documentation required to complete review, i.e. a Negative Declaration or an EIR.
As staff works with consultants to complete this process, efforts are simultaneously underway to update other areas of the zoning code that are either exempt from this CEQA process or can benefit from further public input. These efforts are described further below.
Updates to the Planning Code
There are three major amendments to the Planning Code currently in process to align the Town’s policies and programs with the adopted Housing Element. This includes updates to the Town’s Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Ordinance, the creation of multifamily design and development standards, and the consideration of an Inclusionary Housing Ordinance.
ADU Ordinance
Updates to the Town’s ADU Ordinance are currently under review. The Planning Commission adopted a resolution at their October 25, 2023, meeting that recommended revisions for consideration by the City Council at their meeting on November 15, 2023.
The purpose of the ADU Ordinance is two-fold, to align the Town’s regulations with state law and to incorporate programs identified in the Town’s adopted Housing Element.
Should the City Council approve an ordinance that is different from the adopted Housing Element, staff will revise the Housing Element accordingly and provide those revisions to the Planning Commission and City Council when they reconsider a comprehensive Housing Element update package.
However, the Council should be aware that state law requires the Town to send its ADU Ordinance to HCD for review and, therefore, subsequent revisions to the ordinance may be required. Please note that this review process is distinct from HCD’s review of Housing Elements and can also be iterative, especially with the regular passage of ADU-related state laws. Adoption of an ordinance with the intent to align with state law is a demonstration of good faith effort that is especially important given the Town’s focus on ADUs as a strategy for lower income housing units. This process is exempt from CEQA review.
Housing Element Update
November 15, 2023
Multifamily Design and Development Standards
The Town is currently in a community outreach and engagement process to receive input on standards that will apply to multifamily development. This commenced with a workshop on October 23, 2023, and has continued with a joint study session between the City Council and Planning Commissioners on November 1, 2023, as well as a second workshop on November 13, 2023. The discussion at the joint study session has not concluded and will also carry over to a second study session on November 27, 2023, at 3PM in Council Chambers.
The goal of these outreach efforts is to receive feedback that will facilitate an initial draft of standards. These standards will then require consideration by both the Planning Commission and City Council for adoption. Because these standards reflect the implementation of the addition of a zoning overlay, currently under evaluation in the CEQA process, adoption of the standards must occur at the completion of the CEQA process.
Inclusionary Housing Ordinance and Fee
The adopted Housing Element references two components of a program relating to the pursuit of an inclusionary housing ordinance and fee. The first component would require 20 percent of market rate units in a multifamily development project to be made available to households at lower-income levels. The second component would require a fee on single-family development and additions. This fee program would then provide an in-lieu option whereby a project could provide an affordable deed-restricted ADU or Junior ADU (JADU) on-site instead of paying the fee. Funds generated by this fee would be used to support affordable housing in Atherton, which could facilitate subsidies for housing needed in future housing element cycles.
The description above reflects the objectives of an inclusionary housing ordinance and fee program that is identified in the adopted housing element. It does not reflect an adopted program. Consultants for the Town are currently preparing a nexus study that evaluates the feasibility of this program. For example, the study would provide guidance as to the best proportion of multifamily housing that should be affordable, as well as what income levels are achievable given the Town’s development environment. The nexus study would also provide information to the Town on the appropriate impact fee amount that should apply to single-family development in order to facilitate affordable housing.
Housing Element Text Revisions
The major remaining effort to update the text of the Housing Element itself, is to align revisions with the decisions that are made based on the zoning code updates described above and to shift other programmatic deadlines to reflect the current state of the Housing Element. Text revisions will also include any clarifications HCD has previously requested.
NEXT STEPS
Staff anticipates receiving feedback and responses from consultants over the next four to six weeks. This information will continue to shape both the Planning Commission and City Council agendas. However, as described above, to not severely impact these calendars, staff has taken an
Housing Element Update
November 15, 2023
approach to move forward what decisions and discussions may be possible at this time. These actions include consideration and adoption of updates to the ADU Ordinance and providing constructive feedback towards the creation of design and development standards for multifamily housing.
FISCAL IMPACT
The overall fiscal impact to the General Fund would be $323,244 to complete the Housing Element and related CEQA review. Related work would be $159,553 to complete Objective Design Standards and $118,553 to complete Zoning Code modifications. Funds would be allocated from the Unallocated General Fund Balance.
PUBLIC NOTICE
Public notification was achieved by posting the agenda, with this agenda item being listed, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting in print and electronically. Information about the project is also disseminated via the Town’s electronic News Flash and Atherton Online. There are approximately 1,200 subscribers to the Town’s electronic News Flash publications. Subscribers include residents as well as stakeholders – to include, but be not limited to, media outlets, school districts, Menlo Park Fire District, service provides (water, power, and sewer), and regional elected officials.
CEQA
This item is statutorily exempt from CEQA under Section 15262, Feasibility and Planning Studies.
ATTACHMENT
None
November 11, 2023
Dear Mayor Widmer and Honorable Council Members and Commissioners:
My name is David Arata, and my family and I own the 23 Oakwood property located in the Town of Atherton. As you know, I submitted a letter to all of you on November 1, 2023, in preparation for the Joint Town Council / Planning Commission Study Session. In that letter, I thanked you for taking the necessary first steps towards achieving the Town’s housing goals. I also asked to be a part of the process with the Town, hoping to provide input into the development of the Town’s Objective Design Standards.
Specifically, I expressed concern that overly narrow or prescriptive development standards could render development infeasible, and I wish to ensure that any new standards both meet the Town’s objectives and can result in a marketable product. I look forward to your ongoing discussion of these issues at the public workshop and again ask that you provide formal direction to Staff to coordinate with me as it looks to finalize the development standards that will apply to my property.
In short, I am simply asking that the Town allow flexibility in product type in developing its Objective Design Standards. As noted in the Town’s Staff Report for the November 1, 2023, meeting, “greater flexibility from (adopted standards) may be required to facilitate future development”. To further that point, it was stated by Town Staff that the large house typology, the design focus of the meeting, is one that “used to be built pre- World War II. . .then kind of stopped”. This highlights the risk of only contemplating this one product type when developing the Objective Design Standards; if that one product type cannot feasibly be developed, then the Town is left with nothing. It is my understanding that to comply with the State Housing Element Law’s requirements, the Objective Design Standards must enhance the probability that construction of these homes actually takes place, and that they may not act as a “constraint”, or as noted by Town Staff at the last meeting, that the Objective Design Standards make the development of new homes “reasonably foreseeable” that can “actually be built”, etc.
Should the Town continue to go down this narrow focus on Design Standards, our family feels that we will have an unmarketable property that will not generate interest from developers, as this product is not one, as Staff points out, that is in the existing new home marketplace. Our understanding is that this result would be in direct conflict with the Town’s stated housing goals and the State Housing Element Law’s requirements.
It was apparent at the last meeting that two items in particular were giving the Council and Commission the largest amount of nervousness, that of 1) building height and 2) the potential for increasing the number of buildable homes via State Density Bonus law. Our family recognizes those concerns and wishes to work with the Town in developing standards that help alleviate those concerns.
It is our understanding that the Town can still meet State Fair Housing Laws by adopting zoning designations and Objective Design Standards that 1) allow for attached, multifamily construction in the production of the homes at a minimum density, and, 2) as long as the minimum density threshold is maintained (in this case, 10 homes per acre / 16 homes total) also allow detached homes that are consistent with this density threshold to be considered as an allowable product type.
Our family wishes to lessen uncertainty of what can be developed on the property and work with Town Staff on Objective Design Standards that contemplate both attached and detached housing types. This
dialogue should give the Town greater clarity and certainty on how its community will develop, while also meeting State housing goals.
Thank you again for your consideration and we look forward to working with the Town.
Sincerely,
David Arata
Item No. 13
Town of Atherton
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT – REGULAR AGENDA
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
GEORGE RODERICKS, CITY MANAGER
FROM: ANTHONY SUBER, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER/ CITY CLERK
DATE: NOVEMBER 15, 2023
SUBJECT: DISCUSSION OF THE CENTER FOR AGE-FRIENDLY
EXCELLENCE FOCUS GROUP AND TASK FORCE RESULTS
AND CONSIDERATION OF AARP APPLICATION PROCESS.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Council review and discuss the Center for Age-Friendly Excellence Standing Committee recommendations, focus group results and provide direction regarding the AARP application process.
BACKGROUND
San Mateo County arranged for the Center for Age-Friendly Excellence (CAFE) to work with select cities in the County providing technical assistance through December 2023. City Council ratified the Age-Friendly Standing Committee at the June 21, 2023, meeting committing to forming a local Age-Friendly Task Force to assist in building collaborative partnerships within the County by sharing resources and coordinating activities. Vice Mayor Hawkins-Manuelian and Councilmember Lewis were assigned as the liaisons.
The Standing Committee, Town staff and CAFE, Deputy Director Cynthia Nakayama developed outreach material to begin to recruit for resident volunteers to participate in one-time focus groups and a fixed term task force that would assist the Standing Committee in analyzing and prioritizing focus group results and recommendations.
The goal of the project was to identify the unmet needs of older adults and recommend programs or initiatives that can be implemented to assist older people in the Town. The focus groups were designed to help uncover the needs of the 55 + community and solicit resident input on potential solutions. A component of the Task Force and focus groups identified the evolving needs that develop for sub-groups within the older adult population. As an example, someone who is aged 55 – 64 will have different needs from an older adult that is 80+.
CAFE Report
NOVEMBER 15, 2023
Town Obligations
The Town is under no obligation to take any further action once certified through the World Health Organization (WHO) and AARP the United States affiliate of WHO. If Council move forward with an application to AARP. The commitment made at the June Council meeting was to convene the standing committee and should the Council opt not to move forward with an application to become a certified age-friendly city recognized by the World Health Organization (WHO) the Council has full authority to consider any recommendations of the standing committee and task force independent of an age-friendly application.
ANALYSIS
The Standing Committee and Task Force members reviewed the results from the focus groups held that were made up exclusively of residents of the Town’s 55+ community. Atherton Police Department staff and Menlo Park Fire Protection District staff provided commentary identifying needs related to health & safety and emergency preparedness. The focus group results identified 7 major categories within the WHO/AARP eight domains of livability. The focus group comments and outcomes were grouped within these categories. Below is a list of the categories identified and standing committee and task force proposed programs or initiatives that aimed at addressing varying unmet needs. For a complete review of the focus group summary refer to Attachment 1.
Transportation & Mobility
Potential Initiatives / Projects:
▪ Communicate to residents existing services for transportation, such as Ride PVI – www.1pvi.org. The service is available for medical and pharmacy appointments, grocery shopping, senior center visits, and religious centers.
Social Participation & Inclusion, Community Connectivity Potential Initiatives / Projects:
▪ Foster physical spaces where people can naturally gather. ▪ Potential collaboration with the library or local schools to provide programs to assist with online access/resources for seniors, including those with visual impairments and training workshops or programs.
▪ The Town has upgraded its current website to ensure that it is Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) compliant. This compliance applies to visual, auditory, speech, cognitive, language, and other disabilities.
General Communication & Information
Potential Initiatives / Projects:
▪ Incorporating localized communication channels such as the local newspapers to a greater degree.
▪ Develop a reoccurring section within the quarterly Athertonian newsletter to share news, information, and resources specifically for older adults. ▪ Develop resource center display at the Atherton Library
CAFE Report
NOVEMBER 15, 2023
o Peninsula Volunteers, Inc (Little House, Rosener House, Meals of Wheels, Ride PVI) | Sequioa Healthcare District – Sequoia Strong: Adults 50+ www.seqhd.org/sequoiastrong-adults-50 (Health Services, Community Support, Fitness & Sport, Social Engagement, and Independent Living)
▪ Develop a quarterly or bi-annual Senior day hosted at Town center to engage residents and connect them with service providers and programs specifically meeting their needs. ▪ Staff has enhanced our use of physical message boards located at Town Center and will increase that presence.
Housing
Current / Ongoing Projects:
▪ The 6th Cycle Housing Element Update process is underway and will include analysis and assessments across varying income levels and within the Housing Needs Data Report includes a section dedicated to assessing the needs of seniors. The Housing Element Update is a working document that is undergoing a variety of revisions. ▪ The Town has prepared a variety of resources related to Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU)and will be revising Town Ordinances related to these structures in late 2023. The Planning and Building Departments have FAQ’s available to discuss the process of planning and building ADU’s.
Infrastructure & Facilities
Current / Ongoing Projects:
There are several capital projects in the works related to pedestrian and bicycle safety including:
▪ Selby Lane Bicycle Lane Improvement Project Bike Lane ▪ Traffic Safety Improvement Project & Maintenance (street striping and signage installation)
▪ El Camino Real Complete Streets Gap Project
▪ Class III Pavement Markings
▪ Watkins Avenue Pedestrian Improvements/ Middlefield
Community Support | Health Services
Potential Initiatives / Projects:
▪ The Atheron Task Force discussed developing bi-annual or quarterly resource workshops hosted at Town Center. This would be a staff lead initiative inviting local service providers to educate the 55 + community and address needs across several categories including enhanced and alternative communication activities, increase in community gatherings, and education related to senior rights. Designing re-occurring events will address the unmet needs that address community-building.
▪ Focus Group results and assessments indicated that partnering with neighboring agencies to collaborate on existing services could aid in addressing needs beyond the Towns resources.
▪ The Task Force concurred with the 55+ community desire for health and wellness access that includes physical activity. The activity could be in individual or group settings furthering the community-building component and enhancing quality of life goals. Task
CAFE Report
NOVEMBER 15, 2023
Force members proposed exercise equipment specifically for seniors at Holbrook-Palmer Park.
▪ Task Force members suggested a resident led committee focused entirely on addressing unmet needs of the 55+ community and identifying the varying needs that exist within each sub age category, ages 55-64, 65-74, 75-79, and 80+.
Emergency Preparedness & Safety
Current / Ongoing Projects:
▪ ADAPT has begun the process of connecting with community members via parties / gatherings and will continue those efforts in the Summer of 2024. ADAPT has been active in connecting with residents during regular meetings and have polled participants on their interest in home checks in case of emergency. That information will be maintained at the assembly points for ADAPT members to conduct those home checks during emergencies.
Potential Initiatives / Projects:
▪ The Atherton Police Department prepares monthly reports related to criminal activity, calls for service, response times for low, medium and high priority calls and other police related activities. APD reports on home/vacation checks, Holbrook-Palmer Park patrols, and School incidents.
▪ MPFPD and APD have discussed collaborative initiatives to gather access to resident homes quickly, such as getting gate codes or access to lock boxes. ▪ The Police Department hosts community meetings to inform and educate residents on things related to car and home protection. The latest meeting took place on November 2, 2023. These community forums are also prime opportunities to educate and inform residents and best practices related to theft deterred measures, cyber-crime awareness, and collaborative conversations with A.D.A.P.T. related to emergency preparedness activities and efforts.
▪ To address the preparedness of older adults in an emergency distributing 72-hour emergency
Next Steps
The Council may consider directing staff to move forward with the WHO/AARP application for inclusion in the WHO Network of Age-friendly Cities or receive the report and recommendations for future discussions related to possible projects and initiatives without applying for certification.
If the Council opts to move forward with the application, the letter of intent prepared in May 2023 will be provided as supportive documentation. By establishing the Age-Friendly Community Task Force the Town committed to:
• Conducting a baseline community assessment on the needs of older adults, which was completed with the focus group results.
• Establish a three-year action plan to address the identified needs, which may be considered for completion following an application; and
• Develop tools to measure the progress of the action plan, which may be considered by the standing committee, task force and staff
CAFE Report
NOVEMBER 15, 2023
With the submission of the application, the Town will be committing to providing annual progress reports to AARP regarding implementation of the Action Plan. The Town will have the option to contract with an outside consultant to support staff in the efforts to develop an Action Plan or work to develop the plan in-house.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact as a result of this report, however if the Town moves forward with the AARP application there may be costs related to contracting with an outside consultant to develop the Action Plan and costs to implement any significant programs.
GOAL ALIGNMENT
This Report and its contents are in alignment with the following Council Policy Goals:
• Goal Area E – Strengthen Community Engagement and Transparency • Goal Area F – Be Forward-Thinking, Well-Managed, and Well-Planned
POLICY FOCUS
The creation of the age-friendly standing committee is part of developing a diverse and inclusive community. The information collected can contribute to a variety of priority projects for the Town within each of the Town’s service areas.
PUBLIC NOTICE
Public notification was achieved by posting the agenda, with this agenda item being listed, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting in print and electronically. Information about the project is also disseminated via the Town’s electronic News Flash and Atherton Online. There are approximately 1,200 subscribers to the Town’s electronic News Flash publications. Subscribers include residents as well as stakeholders –to include, but be not limited to, media outlets, school districts, Menlo Park Fire Protection District, service provides (water, power, and sewer), and regional elected officials.
COMMISSION/COMMITTEE FEEDBACK/REFERRAL
This item has been reviewed in part by the Age-Friendly Standing Committee
ATTACHMENTS
1. Focus Group Results
2. Standing Committee Recommendations
1 CAFE: The Center for Age-Friendly Excellence
Advancing Livable Communities for all Generations
Summary and Collated Notes
Focus Groups with Older Adult Residents (55+)
Standing Committee and Task Force
Regarding Unmet Needs of Atherton Older Adult Residents Dates of Zoom Focus Group Discussions: August 21 and 23, September 13, 2023 Total # In-Person Focus Group and 1:1 participants: 27 (17F / 10 M) CAFE Staff Facilitator: Cynthia Nakayama
Video- and Audio-recorded using Altis.io (rough draft summary) Report reviewed and finalized by Pauline DeLange Martinez, Senior Research Associate, CAFE Background
The goal of this project is to identify the unmet needs of older adults and recommend programs that may be implemented to assist older people in the Town of Atherton, California. Older adults often are overlooked during city planning and government programming. We intend to both understand their needs, and to design programs that will enable them to flourish. This will change and evolve depending on their age. For example someone who is age 55 or 65 will have different needs from an older adult who is 85 and older. The Town of Atherton will need to consider these differences at some point. We already know that older adults have different needs and limitations regarding housing, transportation, and the use of outside spaces and buildings. We know they may have different or more need for social interaction and respect. We don’t know how to best reach them, communicate with them, or promote their civic participation. We don’t know what additional community support, information, classes, programs or health services the Town should provide, and are looking to produce insights that will guide our decision making. We’re ultimately looking for ideas for how we might support our older adult residents through governmental programs or community projects.
2 Transportation & Mobility: Unmet Needs
Public Transportation
There is a clear need for a dedicated transportation service tailored to the unique needs of older adults, particularly for those who cannot drive and are not able to afford or access on-demand transportation using technology. Transportation is essential to access healthcare, shopping, social activities, and more.
Currently, Atherton residents rarely use mass transit. They may not be able to use technology such as Uber and have no family to drive them. People who live alone may be particularly isolated.
As people get older, there is a greater mistrust of strangers so there is a need for a trusted service they can call. There is Uber for kids (transportation to school) so parents are confident that it’s a safe driver; we need something similar for older adults.
Finally, there’s a need to communicate information regarding available accessible transportation for those who do not drive. Currently, there is no publicizing of transportation services although we probably have almost all the services we need.
Mobility, Walkability
Participants emphasized a need for sidewalks or protected walking lanes on the main thoroughfares in Atherton. The community has grown substantially, there are many bikers, and it does not feel safe.
Here are some participant quotes regarding traffic safety and walkability:
“It’s a death trap. I’m waiting for accidents to happen there; the sides of the road are very uneven for walking, biking, or stroller. You’re in the middle of the road.” “There are no sidewalks – this may be a need now.”
“Many walk in the middle of the street; one older person uses her walker and walks 5 miles per day. Sometimes she walks close to the middle (of the road).” “Although the walking paths in the park have been widened and people in wheelchairs can also use them, safe walking paths are needed in town.” Safer traffic conditions are necessary to ensure that older adults can comfortably navigate their town, whether it be on foot, by bicycle, or vehicle. Currently, participants noted many drivers go over the speed limit, do not use turn signals, or make complete stops. One participant shared, “I notice that younger people have a tendency to drive faster which increases the risk for walkers and bikers.” In addition, shrubbery and tree overgrowth obscures traffic signs in multiple locations. One participant shared, “I have had many near misses either riding my bike, walking the dog, or even in my car. Need these to be trimmed.”
Some especially unsafe roads are Walsh Road, Fair Oaks, and Park Drive. On Park Drive, the construction and large trucks make it difficult to maneuver.
Finally, participants expressed concern about kids on e-bikes who ride through the stop signs. “They don’t understand the danger.”
3 Transportation & Mobility: Potential Solutions
Public Transportation
It was suggested that an assessment be made to understand how many residents in Atherton can no longer drive and/or have unmet transit needs. These residents could possibly be identified through A.D.A.P.T. (Atherton Disaster and Preparedness Team) program efforts.
There needs to be better promotion of existing transportation options, including those offered by nearby cities that Atherton residents can benefit from. For example, Avenidas Door-to-Door provides transportation services to Atherton, Menlo Park’s shuttle offered through their Parks and Recreation, the Marguerite bus system, Redi-Wheels (SamTrans), and a Palo Alto transportation for seniors that takes them from point A to point B for $1.
To meet remaining needs, Atherson could offer our own dedicated senior-specific transportation service. Shared rides could be used where both people have the same destination. This could be offered in collaboration with nearby cities. For example, currently, Sam Trans is doing a pilot program – a specialty door-to-door service at a reasonable price with 3 cities (E. Palo Alto, City of Palo Alto, and one other). It would be great to see if this can be expanded to Atherton.
One final idea was to offer tech training for older adults to use Uber and Lyft.
Mobility, Walkability
The safety challenges around Fair Oaks are currently being addressed. Public Works has developed a project plan and funding has been approved. They will be adding school speed bumps, beautifying the intersection, and adding a walking trail at the corner.
Suggestions to improve mobility and walkability included: encouraging residents to report safety concerns to the Police Department; requiring trucks to make noises signifying their approach (similar to an ice cream truck or lunch truck); potentially adding sidewalks; and/or encouraging residents to walk in areas outside of Atherton, for example, organizing an intergenerational walk-a-thon event to get people out of the house and moving.
Social Participation: Unmet Needs
Participants expressed a significant need for more inclusive and regular community activities that cater to all age groups. Building a sense of community is important. As one participant said, “We need a way to get to know neighbors so we/they can count on them if there’s a problem or emergency.” Participants also noted that isolated older residents, especially those who cannot drive, may need extra community support.
Several contributors to social isolation were identified, including changing area dynamics, large distances between homes, empty homes (“ghost residents”), and working adults and families being too busy. Participants shared, “It is tough to meet people here and develop close relationships or create a neighborhood due to the dynamic we have here,” and, “(We should) look at how to change the cycle, structure, and challenge of meeting other people in this town so that the upcoming cohort does not have the same experience as us.”
It was noted that Atherton does not have a Parks and Rec department, which helps to organize social events in other cities. Additionally, Atherton lacks an official downtown and a Senior Center.
While there is a library, it was noted that many of their activities are geared towards children and youth.
4 Also, participants felt that community-wide events seem to be more catered towards families than older adults, such as Atherton’s National Night Out.
Social Participation: Potential Solutions
Participants brought up a variety of ideas to increase social participation among older Atherton residents. First, social connections can be fostered through physical places. Participants suggested to find ways to make the Town Center area feel more like a ‘downtown’ by offering activities and events that get residents to gather there. (One participant noted that Mademoiselle Collette will be opening a shop in front of the library soon and their intent is to somewhat replicate a downtown.) Other ideas were to install an outdoor chessboard or Bocce ball courts.
A variety of programs and events could be offered and advertised to older residents. They could be held at the Town Center, new library, Heritage Room, Holbrook Palmer Park facilities, Old House, Atherton Arts Foundation for art classes, or a variety of outdoor spaces. For example, we could offer:
• Yoga, stretching classes, exercise classes, dancing
• Tae Kwon Do
• Bingo
• Bridge groups (mentioned several times) or lessons
• Mahjong
• Photography classes
• Book reviews/ Book clubs at Library
• Educational classes on environmental and potential emergency issues (wildfires, emergency preparedness). Classes could highlight ways to volunteer or support relief efforts. • Speaker series (similar to Menlo Park) - topics include culture, travel, safety ▪ Movies or organize a film festival and invite renowned directors /speakers • Small local environmental program
• Music-related events or Concerts
• Monthly food truck event
• Small tours to a historical or other museums, or to hear speakers at places like Cantor Arts Several participants mentioned interest in Computer classes/clinics. A weekly ‘tech support’ day could be offered where residents could bring their devices to receive help. This could be offered at the Old Heritage Council Room. An IT support person could be funded a few hours per week. This also provides the opportunity for a social network and new friendships to form since people will talk together about their technology challenges.
Other participants mentioned tech support resources are in-the-works or already exist. Friends of the Library is planning to launch an initiative to provide tech help for older people, using excess funds from the Atherton library. AnewVista.org (or anvcs.org) is another tech program offered through Sacred Heart (Eric Gee is the instructor). This program is open to older adults; you can participate online or in person. Perhaps these could be better advertised.
The Town could consider organizing intergenerational activities and events. One participant shared, “The older I get, the more I enjoy being around younger people.” The library was noted as a great place to connect generations and Friends of the Library was noted as a resource to organize intergenerational programs.
One participant suggested cooking- and food-related events be organized. As residents age, they may have transitioned from cooking for a family, to only cooking for themselves. There is a need to
5 ensure meals are still nutritious and easily made. Eating is also a social activity – and older residents may enjoy cooking and eating together.
Another idea was to organize a local Farmer’s Market, for example, at the Town Center or Holbrook Palmer Park.
One person suggested we get the Atherton Dames back together. They were a great group that sponsored Easter and Christmas events and contributed a lot to all ages of the community.
We could partner with Palo Alto Medical Foundation to organize educational classes or a resource fair. They do outreach to seniors and provide classes and may know of topics of interest. They may also be interested in sponsoring an event and have a table with their logo.
Menlo Park has a pancake breakfast through the Fire Department – it is a community event; we can do the same, with pancakes, Belgium waffles or crepes; since we have the same Fire department, we can ask them.
Approximately seven to eight existing Town committees and groups have within their charter some activity that would help in social connection. These groups could help brainstorm opportunities to increase engagement among older residents. Many of these committees already include older members. A separate senior-focused committee could also be formed. They could help plan and manage a calendar of events and programs geared towards older residents.
To get a better understanding of what types of social engagement opportunities are of greatest interest to older Atherton residents, a survey could be collected.
We could also learn from what other communities are doing. For example, we could sit in on one or more meetings to hear ideas from the Los Altos and Los Altos Hills senior committee. The two cities formed a combined senior committee where they each share ideas on what their city’s/town’s older adult residents are doing. We could also look at small towns that are similar to ours, such as Hillsborough, to see what they offer to engage older residents.
Existing social opportunities should be better promoted. For example, A.D.A.P.T. meetings were noted as a good way to get to know neighbors. Also, morning Tai Chi is offered at the Town Center.
When advertising programs and events, promotion should be accessible for those with low vision or limited internet access. Ensure that programs and events are accessible and attractive to older residents, not just young families. As noted, currently, many community events feel as though they are more geared towards youth or young families. The Town could market events with photos and language that is more inclusive of older residents. To ensure events are accessible for all ages and abilities, there should be accessible parking, restrooms, shade, and seating.
Social opportunities from neighboring cities could also be better advertised to Atherton residents. For example, Menlo Park provides community programs and services that are used by Athertonians; their activities guide comes out quarterly and is mailed and available at the library.
Finally, for residents who are particularly isolated, it was noted that the A.D.A.P.T. team visits residents door-to-door. They check on people and describe services; this is a form of social connection.
The Scouts/ Boy Scouts can also visit older residents or provide volunteer assistance to those who need it. (Lee Kenna was noted as a key contact.) Scouts get merit badges for serving seniors. Scouts may be able to walk door to door for A.D.A.P.T. to gather data on isolated adults and also learn who needs help.
If someone arrives in a Scout uniform, a person is more likely to open their door. Finally, participants felt that High School students could be engaged in supporting isolated older residents.
6 Communication and Information: Unmet Needs
There is a need to improve and enhance communication methods to keep older Atherton residents informed about community events, resources, and services. Communications could highlight information about social activities, how to sign up for emergency alerts and local crime alerts (e.g., through San Mateo County or the Newsflash), key community contacts (e.g., who to contact if a tree goes down in your neighborhood, non-emergency policy number), healthcare resources, trusted and vetted resources for home maintenance and repairs / handymen, and resources related to technology and appliances. We could also communicate information about programs, activities, and resources from local communities such as Menlo Park and Redwood City.
It was recognized that communication channels exist, such as the Athertonian, Atherton Living, and the library. Additionally, the Town currently distributes quarterly newsletters to every resident mailbox, which is a valuable communication piece, though there is a desire to receive more regular communication about ongoing programs, activities, and events. Participants shared that there is no obvious focal point for communication; the town used to have bulletin boards in the neighborhoods that were helpful.
One participant described feeling overwhelmed with receiving too much communication via email and mail; they said it was challenging to prioritize and differentiate what’s important and worth their while.
Another barrier to accessing information is limited technology skills among some older residents. Some may need education and training on how to use their electronic devices.
One participant mentioned that he was becoming increasingly visually impaired and that he knew others who were the same. He expressed the need for ways to communicate to the visually and hearing impaired.
Finally, a challenge related to communication is scams and fraud. It is important that residents know who/what they can trust for information. At the same time, we can offer education on how to prevent scams, e.g., offer training and a document (to be posted on/near your front door) on steps to take if for example, someone comes to your door or calls and you don’t know what to do. Participants felt that most people won’t remember what to do unless they have an actual list of steps to take; they can keep copies on/near their door, phone, etc.
Communication and Information: Potential Solutions
Participants brought up a variety of existing communication resources in Atherton that could be better promoted. For example, we could increase resident awareness that they can enroll in Atherton online - a weekly email blast from the City Manager’s office that provides new and recurring topics, meetings, etc. (contact Anthony Suber with your email address to receive these).
Existing, local communication channels could incorporate a regular section geared towards older residents. For example, the Athertonian could highlight articles of interest to older residents and advertise trusted resources and services.
For residents with accessibility needs, we should communicate that the Town website and Atherton’s Agenda Management System are both ADA compliant. The information on the website can be accessed using a screen reader and it will read everything to you. There are free versions available.
Another resource that should be better advertised is the Simplicity app. Residents need to set up an account to receive information in the categories you select, and specific to your area (Atherton,
7 San Mateo County). It is one-way communication so there is no noise. One participant learned of the focus group this way and is happy with the app. Simplicity goes out and scrapes information from the town’s website; for example, a news flash about the burglaries that happened, or about an upcoming meeting.
Participants expressed the importance of communicating in a wide variety of ways and then let people know how we will continue to communicate. This can be achieved through traditional methods such as mailing, distributing flyers door to door (A.D.A.P.T. leaves handouts in residents’ mailboxes), large-print newsletters, or phone-based notifications about town events and activities.
Communication can also be shared electronically, for example, through a shared electronic or downloadable calendar, local alert systems, and a website or online platform that lists activities and events in and around Atherton. Participants liked the idea of an accessible living calendar that people can just tap into at any time, and it is continually evolving; we would just need to publicize the calendar itself. However, it’s important to keep in mind that some older adults are not comfortable navigating online apps and email. To bridge this need, we should offer technology classes that can help older adults stay connected, informed, and engaged with the community. Attendees could have questions answered such as, “How do we share events via our e-calendars,” “How do I get this email to work,” or, “How do I get rid of my landline?”
For any printed or digital communication geared towards older adults, an idea was to create/ use a logo designated specifically for ‘senior support’ so that older adult residents are more likely to pay attention to it as information they can use. This could address the challenge of ‘too much information’ and help older residents prioritize what is targeted specifically to them.
Another idea would be to communicate key information at an event, for example, a senior health fair, or a farmers’ market in Atherton; a booth could offer information geared towards older residents. We could also organize a booth at the Menlo Park farmers market to communicate about activities in Atherton.
San Mateo County created a Community Information Handbook about resources that our older adult residents might find helpful. This could be distributed to Atherton residents, e.g., via mail, dropping them off door-to-door, or distributing them at local events.
Finally, it is important to conduct extra outreach to older adult residents that are isolated. (A.D.A.P.T. is working on this.) In addition to communicating information, we may need to offer transportation to programs and events. A surprisingly large number of Atherton residents are housebound, living alone, and their family members only visit once or twice a week. Meals on Wheels is a resource that can be tapped into for this information.
Housing: Unmet Needs
The Atherton Housing Element provide a comprehensive overview of unmet needs and potential solutions related to local housing. We should ensure the Housing Element includes a focus on older residents, including availability of affordable and accessible housing, and support for residents to maintain their homes.
Participants noted community resistance to building more dense housing options. However, offering a variety of housing options can cater to those with different incomes and accessibility needs.
For example, a senior housing complex could include universal design elements and be located in
8 walking distance to healthcare, groceries, social activities, and services. ADUs were noted as a resource to allow family members or caregivers to live nearby older residents.
Some participants described meeting with Habitat for Humanity as they may be building housing in Atherton that is not older adult focused but 20% low income. Part of the conversation included discussing housing needs related to older adults.
Besides building new housing, there’s a need to help residents maintain and renovate their existing homes as they age. Participants expressed a need to communicate information about trusted, vetted, and affordable contractors and handymen.
Housing: Potential Solutions
The Town could provide leadership at a planning and policy level by reviewing the current Housing Element to ensure the needs of older adults are addressed and included.
Older adult residents could benefit from information about reliable services for home repair, maintenance, and other practical needs. Resources should be broadly shared (via communication strategies listed in the previous section), for example, Ace Hardware has tech people you can hire to do things in your home, and the Scouts offers minor home assistance (Scout hotline).
Participants also suggested offering a conference or educational session about accessory dwelling units (ADUs), or an issue of the Athertonian dedicated to ADUs along with resources and information. ADU builders could provide education about various ADU designs. Potential use cases could be presented, for example, various family scenarios, or the option to move out of the large home into the ADU, then rent the larger home to gain an income.
Respect and Social Inclusion: Unmet Needs
Atherton has a high percentage of older adults, at 24%, and overall, participants feel that older residents are respected. As described in the ‘social participation’ section, participants were interested in more intergenerational and age-inclusive programs, activities, and events. Bridging generations builds a sense of community and provides benefits to all.
Participants expressed concerns about safety. In particular, scams and fraud are a huge and growing issue. Neglect (including self-neglect) and isolation are challenges that are often invisible as they occur inside the home. Again, participants noted a high volume of Meals on Wheels clients in Atherton. Also, participants expressed concerns about recent robberies and fear of walking alone – whether it be daytime or nighttime. Older residents with mobility challenges may be particularly vulnerable to physical abuse or assault.
Respect and Social Inclusion: Potential Solutions
(see also Social Participation and Community Support and Health Services) Older adults would benefit from activities that offer intergenerational interaction and accessible transportation. Also, it’s important to offer activities that are not age specific but rather age inclusive.
Menlo Park’s community events were highlighted as a model, e.g., ‘Tour de Menlo.’ Several other potential solutions are described under the ‘Social Participation’ and ‘Transportation’ sections.
For those who need mobility assistance or are isolated, there is a need to provide education on how to maintain safety in a variety of environments. Elder rights education necessary and important for
9 all of us; for information and to avoid potential situations of elder abuse. A final idea in this section was to use Newsflash to alert residents on the latest scam that has occurred nearby.
Outdoor Spaces and Buildings: Unmet Needs
Holbrook Palmer Park was described as a 22-acre jewel. Anyone can go and walk, use the facilities, or attend dog training activities. However, some participants felt that public spaces like Holbrook Palmer Park need better maintenance and upgrades to facilitate community gatherings.
Specifically, the bathrooms and water fountains were described as ‘unusable,’ and need maintenance.
One participant also suggested increasing the landscaping around new venues such as the Town Center and Library. Finally, the lack of sidewalks in Atherton also suggests a potential need for infrastructure improvements for older adults, particularly those with mobility issues.
Outdoor Spaces and Buildings: Potential Solutions
Repair and upgrade of Holbrook Palmer Park is currently underway and will make it more welcoming, clean, and accessible. Now that the community center is done, the strategic plan is to focus on the park over the next few years and will include playground equipment, new bathrooms, and wayfinding signs.
Civic Participation and Employment: Unmet Needs
Participants felt there are plenty of volunteer opportunities for older adults in Atherton including 7 – 8 committees that are predominantly made up of older residents. New committees are often initiated by older adults when they see a need.
Civic Participation and Employment: Potential Solutions Existing volunteer opportunities could be better advertised to older residents. Also, residents should be encouraged to start their own age-related volunteer initiatives. They could receive mentorship/ camaraderie via an ‘Initiative Lab’ or ‘Entrepreneurial Lab.’ Participants shared, “There are a lot of great ideas in this town and there is definitely an opportunity to develop an age-related initiative at the end of this project.” “If you call it a lab, people will get the idea that it doesn’t need to be perfect.” Community Support/ Health Services: Unmet Needs
Participants noted that the term ‘older adult’ covers a range of abilities, ages, and needs. Some older adults are higher functioning, and their needs may range from a desire for more social engagement and/or support to maintain their own home, while less mobile older adults may need greater support with things like transportation.
One participant said, “There’s an endless list of tasks older adults can feel overwhelmed by.” Maybe they need:
• Home evaluation for safety: e.g. grab bars in the shower or a security system in their home • Caregiver services or help getting the Medicare services they’re entitled to • Landscaping services e.g. help cutting their lawn or getting their gutters cleaned • Assistance to clean things up or throw things out
• Meals on Wheels services
• Resources on who can help them; they have the money available to hire someone • Information on where they can move if they want to move
10 Community Support and Health Services: Potential Solutions The ‘hidden’ seniors (homebound) might benefit from outreach; personal visits from people who can determine if they’re eating well, having regular wellness checks, and getting the help they need with home repairs and home safety assessment, or maybe even medical care and assistance. We’re a small town that can identify the very elderly and possibly arrange visits with these people, maybe on a recurring basis to ensure their safety and even provide some companionship on an ongoing basis. Maybe the town can help these residents, or maybe the residents of Atherton would be happy to contribute their time and money to assist their neighbors with some minor repairs.
The Fire Department was highlighted as a resource with ‘lift assist’ for adults who fall, if a caregiver needs emergency support, or if smoke alarms need replacing.
Emergency Preparedness: Unmet Needs
More resources and education on emergency preparedness could enhance the safety, security, and resilience of older adults during emergencies. There’s a need for more education on what to do in an emergency, particularly for those who do not have family close by to support them. Where do they go for help with the internet, or for power, if their phone is dead? One participant said, “If there is an emergency, I need to know what to do if I’m here alone, or if my husband’s traveling.” Public safety is top priority in this town. However, with extreme climate events and electricity power outages, we need to ensure there’s a system of support. Some older residents may be reliant on power for life sustaining equipment. Others are reliant on electricity for communication.
Potential Solutions: Emergency Preparedness
A.D.A.P.T. offers many critical services related to emergency preparedness and response, but many are not aware of what they offer. One project could be to better advertise their services and also recruit more volunteers to participate. A.D.A.P.T. is recruiting more volunteers to help to knock on doors in neighborhoods. At some point would be nice to be able to ask, as was done in the past, “Do you know how to turn off your gas? Let me show you.”
A.D.A.P.T. is currently launching a new initiative to identify isolated seniors. A database is being developed to include their names, how to contact them, what to do, and what steps to be followed.
They are doing an outreach into neighborhoods and having parties in each of the areas. This way people meet each other, and also sign up at tables; if you are physically able to help others, you can sign up.
You can also sign up if you are an older person and will need help in an emergency - you can request a home check. These will be held at assembly points in each neighborhood and information will be shared with the Area Coordinator in charge.
We could periodically offer classes on how to prepare for electrical outages, including the cost and types of generators, or option to run in a natural gas line. The Town Center is a key resource in Town during power outages, as they have a generator. Another resource for emergency preparedness is the Police Department non-emergency line.
Atherton CAFE Outcomes
Town of Atherton
Center for Age-Friendly Excellence Standing Committee
Standing Committee & Task Force Recommendations
Focus Group Summary:
The following list is representative of the summary of major categories discussed during the Town of Atherton Task Force and Standing Committee related to the Center for Age-Friendly Excellence (CAFE) focus groups facilitated by Cynthia Nakayama, Deputy Director Center for Age-Friendly Excellence. The goal of the project was to identify the unmet needs of older adults within the Town and recommend programs or initiatives to assist them.
Major Topic Areas Included:
Below is a list of the major categories uncovered in the focus groups. Within each of these is a brief explanation of what the focus group discussed and reasonable projects or initiatives the Task Force identified for reccomendation to the City Council.
Transportation & Mobility
Results identified that transportation services for Seniors / Older Adults unable to drive themselves was a desire. These services enable elderly residents to attend community events, activities, and access essential services. Task Force Members identified a variety of existing ridesharing and community transportation services that are available for residents. The Town can consider including this information on a Town webpage designated for Senior / Older Adult and partner with the Atherton Library to install an information area for Senior / Older Adults. The Task Force also suggested that Town staff could consider hosting bi-annual or quarterly in-person information sessions hosted at Town Center with resources, programs, and service-providers related to Senior / Older Adults.
Potential Initiatives / Projects:
▪ Communicate to residents existing services for transportation, such as Ride PVI – www.1pvi.org. The service is available for medical and pharmacy appointments, grocery shopping, senior center visits, and religious centers.
Social Participation & Inclusion, Community Connectivity There is a need to develop programming and activities that cater to the interests and abilities for Senior / Older adults. In addition, developing programs and activities that are intergenerational is a desire to broaden the sense of community engagement. Additional outcomes from the focus groups suggested there is a need for technological assistance and resources as well as increased opportunities to meet and connect in person.
Atherton CAFE Outcomes
Potential Initiatives / Projects:
▪ Foster physical spaces where people can naturally gather. ▪ Potential collaboration with the library or local schools to provide programs to assist with online access/resources for seniors, including those with visual impairments and training workshops or programs.
▪ The Town has upgraded its current website to ensure that it is Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) compliant. This compliance applies to visual, auditory, speech, cognitive, language, and other disabilities.
General Communication & Information [Lead by the Town]
The Task Force noted that current communication methods used by the Town may miss a portion of Senior / Older Adult population that don’t utilize the current channels used by the Town. The Task Force expressed a need to incorporate communication methods that will accommodate intergeneration groups is essential.
Potential Initiatives / Projects:
▪ Incorporating localized communication channels such as the local newspapers to a greater degree.
▪ Develop a reoccurring section within the quarterly Athertonian newsletter to share news, information, and resources specifically for older adults. ▪ Develop resource center display at the Atherton Library ▪ Peninsula Volunteers, Inc (Little House, Rosener House, Meals of Wheels, Ride PVI) | Sequioa Healthcare District – Sequoia Strong: Adults 50+ www.seqhd.org/sequoiastrong-adults-50 (Health Services, Community Support, Fitness & Sport, Social Engagement, and Independent Living)
▪ Develop a quarterly or bi-annual Senior day hosted at Town center to engage residents and connect them with service providers and programs specifically meeting their needs. ▪ Staff has enhanced our use of physical message boards located at Town Center and will increase that presence.
Housing
Focus Group participants noted a community resistance to building more dense housing options.
Participants acknowledged that alternative housing options would allow for more accessibility and noted that the ongoing Housing Element Update process should include a focus on older residents, including availability of affordable and accessible housing, and support for residents to maintain their homes.
Current / Ongoing Projects:
▪ The 6th Cycle Housing Element Update process is underway and will include analysis and assessments across varying income levels and within the Housing Needs Data Report
Atherton CAFE Outcomes
includes a section dedicated to assessing the needs of seniors. The Housing Element Update is a working document that is undergoing a variety of revisions. ▪ The Town has prepared a variety of resources related to Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU)and will be revising Town Ordinances related to these structures in late 2023. The Planning and Building Departments have FAQ’s available to discuss the process of planning and building ADU’s.
▪ Infrastructure & Facilities
Outcomes of the focus group indicated a desire for improvements to social gathering locations including facilities at Holbrook-Palmer Park. There was commentary on a desire to see improvements for bicyclists and pedestrians. This would include sidewalk infrastructure, walking and biking pathways that are essential for senior/older adults to safely navigate through Town.
Potential Initiatives / Projects:
There are several capital projects in the works related to pedestrian and bicycle safety including; ▪ Selby Lane Bicycle Lane Improvement Project Bike Lane ▪ Traffic Safety Improvement Project & Maintenance (street striping and signage installation)
▪ El Camino Real Complete Streets Gap Project
▪ Class III Pavement Markings
▪ Watkins Avenue Pedestrian Improvements/ Middlefield
Community Support | Health Services
Focus groups identified unmet needs related to technical resources and training needs. These needs align with general information related to support programs available for the 55+ community. Focus groups results indicated a general concern for resources related to health and wellness.
Potential Initiatives / Projects:
▪ The Atheron Task Force discussed developing bi-annual or quarterly resource workshops hosted at Town Center. This would be a staff lead initiative invited local service providers to educate the 55 + community and address needs across several categories including enhanced and alternative communication activities, increase in community gatherings, and education related to senior rights. Designing re-occurring events will address the unmet needs that address community-building.
▪ Focus Group results and assessments indicated that partnering with neighboring agencies to collaborate on existing services could aid in addressing needs beyond the Towns resources.
▪ The Task Force concurred with the 55+ community desire for health and wellness access that includes physical activity. The activity could be in individual or group settings furthering the community-building component and enhancing quality of life goals. Task Force members proposed exercise equipment specifically for seniors at Holbrook-Palmer Park.
Atherton CAFE Outcomes
▪ Task Force members suggested a resident led committee focused entirely on addressing unmet needs of the 55+ community and identifying the varying needs that exist within each sub age category, ages 55-64, 65-74, 75-79, and 80+.
Emergency Preparedness & Safety
Outcomes of the focus group addressed concerns over burglaries within Town. Atheron Police Department (APD) personnel expressed concern for the physical safety and preparedness of the 55 + community and their susceptibility to being targets for cyber-crimes. The Menlo Park Fire Protection District (MPFPD) provided commentary noting first responders have three primary concerns facing Atherton residents. The first is gaining access to Atherton properties timely without causing damage to doors, windows etc. The next two concerns were for residents having available social support services and the proper support in the event of an emergency or natural disaster.
Current / Ongoing Projects:
▪ ADAPT has begun the process of connecting with community members via parties / gatherings and will continue those efforts in the Summer of 2024. ADAPT has been active in connecting with residents during regular meetings and have polled participants on their interest in home checks in case of emergency. That information will be maintained at the assembly points for ADAPT members to conduct those home checks during emergencies.
Potential Initiatives / Projects:
▪ The Atherton Police Department prepares monthly reports related to criminal activity, calls for service, response times for low, medium and high priority calls and other police related activities. APD reports on home/vacation checks, Holbrook-Palmer Park patrols, and School incidents.
▪ MPFPD and APD have discussed collaborative initiatives to gather access to resident homes quickly, such as getting gate codes or access to lock boxes. ▪ The Police Department hosts community meetings to inform and educate residents on things related to car and home protection. The latest meeting took place on November 2, 2023. These community forums are also prime opportunities to educate and inform residents and best practices related to theft deterred measures, cyber-crime awareness, and collaborative conversations with A.D.A.P.T. related to emergency preparedness activities and efforts.
▪ To address the preparedness of older adults in an emergency distributing 72-hour emergency
From: john haven
To: Council
Subject: Atherton Council Meeting 11/15 - Re: Playground Date: Wednesday, November 15, 2023 1:20:25 PM
[The e-mail below is from an external source. Please do not open attachments or click links from an unknown or suspicious origin.]
Good Afternoon,
My name is John Haven. I have been involved in the fitness industry for over 35 years. I've been training residents of Atherton full time since 1997. I currently work with over a dozen seniors that live in your town. They, as well as myself, can attest to the benefits of regular exercise. All told, I've trained hundreds of people of all ages and all walks of life. So, basically, I've seen that everyone's life is better with activity.
If you look at any region in the world, the people that live the longest, healthiest and happiest lives are the people that stay active mentally, physically and socially. That's the common denominator. I see it first hand on a daily basis. Now, not everyone can afford my services, so the more free options available, the better. One such group is seniors. They may not have the space or motivation at home. Also, unfortunately, people become more isolated as they age.
I'm excited to hear about the plans for a new playground. This dedicated space can easily serve both populations (old and young). This is a great opportunity to get more people outside and involved in the community. Thus, improving the quality of life for the greatest number.
Thanks for your time.
Kind regards,
John
From: Kenneth Frederick
To: Council
Subject: Comments on & Recommendations in Ref, to Item 13 on the 11/15/23 Town Council Agenda Date: Wednesday, November 15, 2023 4:52:35 PM
[The e-mail below is from an external source. Please do not open attachments or click links from an unknown or suspicious origin.]
Atherton Town Council: (Please note that I’m sending this via e-maIL to all of you because my return flight to SFO has been delayed & I may miss tonights’s meeting)
This note is in reference to your discussion tonight on Item 13: Discussion of the Center for Age-Friendly Excellence Focus Groups and Task Force.
This is my personal expression of what I believe to be the consensus of the Senior Residents that are involved in, or know of the process. Although I have been an active member of the Town’s Senior Task Force, I really can only assert that these are my personal views because the Task Force never drafted and voted on their “official” recommendations. If there is any confusion, suggest that the Task Force should meet again to create and approve their “official” recommendations.
In my numerous conversations in the Task Force, with Focus Group members and with many “Atherton Residents at Large”, I have found overwhelming support and appreciation for the leadership provided by the Town Council and the process run by CFAFE. Without such forward thinking, the Town may not have understood that the large group of Seniors in Atherton have somewhat unique needs that may not be met currently. Those needs are both different from the younger generations & also differ greatly within the Senior population. We all owe the Town Council our gratitude for launching this effort and CFAFE for running this initial process.
That said, my recommendations are: